Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOffice of Traffic Safety - 1983-04-18., 4 S�, _ CJ •r1. ... REQUE* FOR CITY C N OU C* ACTION Date April 11, 1983 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator t � GtTY COTJGT vt;�Y It. lurxon Prepared by: Earle W. Robitaille, Chief of Police iSubject: .... ..,�; Office of Traffic Safety Project Agreement; Detocticn i _ , -r Accident Investigation and Reconstruction (PDAIR)_ Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: Statement of Issue Authorization to enable the Huntingtoni Beach Police Department to enter into a traffic safety agreement with California Off'*.ce of Traffic Safety directed towards reducing the effects of traffic collisions on both of the state highways within the boundaries of Huntington Beach. Reconuiendation Approve the police department's request to enter into the agreement. Analysis Traffic collisions and enforcenent continue to be a major problem for the City of Huntington Beach. This problem is even more apparent of the 16 miles of state highways that are in the city. These state highways comprise only 4 percent of the city's roadways, but account for 22 percent of the fatalities and 23 percent of C-.a injury collisions. During the past year, 1-139 collisions were reported on t-he two state highways. "hich resulted in 4 deaths and 295 injuries. These statisti7s require a concentrated effort be directed toward their reduction. Over the past three years, calls for service have increased, thus reducing tLaff'- enforcement efforts. The primary objective of this project will be to bring about a reduction in the deaths, injuries and proppsty damage due to traffic collisions on Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway by selectively enforcing traffic in the areas that have been statistically detesrtun(.d to be the most hazardous to both resident and transient motorists alike. It will also include the investigat;.on and reconstruction of accidents, with special mphasis on the detection of the drinking driver. Reconstruc- tion will be accomplished with the use of a personal rnicro-computer which is to be purchased with grant monies. The project will create a special traffic enforcement team which will work together to observe and apprehend violators and investigate accidents. The team will consist of two motor officers and two traffic officers who will work on an overtime basis for a period :)f 12 months. The City's contribution would amount to .an estimated $75,965.R2 in in -kind personnel costs for Traffic Bureau personnel to administer the program. A portion of the specialized items of equipment necessary for this project are already a part of the police n A10 41191 1 �j F3QUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL INSON fe. Su ini.tted to: Honorable Mayor and Council Members Submitted by: Charles W. Thampson, City Administrator Prepared try: Earle W. Robitaille, Chief of Police Subject: PARKING CITATION PHDGRAM Office of Traffic Safety Project Agreement; Alcoi-,ol Detec}_ion Accident Investigation and Reconstruction (ADAIR) Page 71 o Analysis (Continued) department's inventory and would be made available. All other costs, including the purchase of a micro--Gcrnputer, will be covered by project grant monies. Potential benefits to the community are expected to take the form of a 10 percent reduction in the nuTber of accidents along Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway and a concomitant reduction in the number of deaths, injuries and property loss resulting from same. rar4l ng Source California Office of Traffic Safety, Grant Program. h1ternative Action Deny the police Oepartment's request. Attachment Copy of the project application. EWR:JR:gsd ...�.� -- State of California W SAFETY OFFICE USE ONLY Business and Transportation .Agency ProlecE Number er OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT AGREEMEJIT Revision Number (Under Section 2907; California Vehicle CAIIrORN/A Code, and Section 4U2(C) of Public Law Date OFFICE O/ IRAUIC SAFETY 89-564 as amended by Public Law 91-605) .J Project Budget Estimate Fiscal. Yr. . Amount 83/84 $ 37$ 892.00 PART 1 -- To be Completed try Applicant Agency �----- -- 1 . Project Title ADAIR ALCOHOL DL•"TF.MUN IN ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION RECONSTRUCTION ��-------- TOTAL, 378,892.00 2. Name of Applicant Agency Humtington Beach Police Department • Project Period Month - Day - Year From: 10 O1 83 3. Agency Unit to Handle Project 'Traffic Bureau To: : 09 50 84 5. Project Description (Summarize the proposed project plan covering the objectives, metho-` of procedure, evaluRtion and end product in approximately 100 word: This project will create a team of officers whose primary function will be the detection and arrest of the drinking driver through enforcement, accident investigation, and reconstruction. The team will patrol during peak hours with special empha,;is directed towards the 16 miles of state highways within our city, and will also include enforcement of the 55 NIP11 speed limit on SRd. The overall objective of the project is to reduce the number of persons injured or killed by 10 percent during the project period. LYtra enforcement and accident investigation will be implemented by the utili- zation of a four -man strike force comprised of two radio cars and tAo motor officers. • Federai. Funds Allocated Under this Agreement Shall Not Exceed $ 7. ACGEFTANCE OF CONDITIONS - The provisions on the Reverse Side hereof Constitute a Fart of this agreement. A Pro ect Director B. Authorizing Official of ARplicantMeng,.- Name l-arlc W. Robitaille Phone 714/536-5902 Name Charles Thanpson Phone 714-536--5575 Address P. 0. Box 70 Address 2000 Main Street lhmtington Beac;1, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Signature Signa4' e'00 r *t .i _ -. Li Title t-}lief of Police Title City s a or C. Fiscal or Accounting Official D. Office Authorized to Receive Payments Name llama Title Address Phone 8. ATTACHMENTS Project Description Schedule A F'rcject Task & Cost Category Sinnmary schedule t i Priority and Contributions Scheudle A-1 Traffic Data Summary Schedule Detailed Budget Schedule B Non -Duplication Certificate Time and Cost Estimate Schedule C hatch Act and E.O.A. Forms 0:S-F-I (Rev. 6/76) SCHEDULE A PROJECT 1)2SCRIPTI1ON PART 1 - Item 6 „;*. 1. BACKGROUND A. General Characteristics The City of 'liuntington Beach is situated 'on the coast between the cities cf Long Beach and Newport Beach. It is crr.Wised of 31.4 square miles of land area encompassing recreational, commercial, industrial send. residential land uses. Within the incorporated city limits are eight miles of recreational beach, a large recreational and residential harbor, a 250-acre regional park, as well as one of the larger comm- tmity colleges in the Southern California area. The city, at this time, is approximately 90% developed, with several high -dens -.ty, populated areas separated by open land. Population patterns and densities as related to vehicle flow and volume varies on a seasonal basis. During four months of the year wd suffer heavy traffic congestion on major arterial highways, which comprise approx- imately 36% of the roadway miles within the city limits. The area is subject to moe,rate rains and dense fogs. The resident population of the city is approximately 179,000 with seasonal influxes raising the figure to in excess of a quarter of a million. B. Streets and Hishways The total public. roadway mileage within the City of Kmtington Reach is 362 miles. Encompassed within the jurisdiction of the city are two state highways and one interstate £Yaeway. State High;. -ay 1 Pacific Coast Highway 10 miles State Highway 39 Beach Boulevard 5.8 miles The City's major streets serve ay commuter connectors from the south coast area to the Long Beach and %ietropol itan Los Angeles areas. Miring the four month summer season every vehicle which travels to the two state owned and operated beaches travels on orn or both of the state highways that are within our city. This tench traffic is far in excess of the normal vehicular traffic during the remainder of the year 2. PROBIT-N IDFNTTTY Traffic collisions and enforcement continue to of Iltmtington Beach. In 1982 there were 4,098 which include 1,261 injury collisions in which There were 18 fatal collisions with Li deaths. be a major problem for the City traffic collisions in the city 1,706 persons were injured. elft. s SCHEDULE A PROJECT P,:SCRIPTION PART I - Item G Compared to 1981, these figures show a slight downward trend, but this is most likely a result of Pacific. Coast highway being closed for almost two months due to severe flooding and the erosion of Bolsa Chica State Beach. The sand from. the beach has buri.-1 Pacific Coast Highway most of the fall and winter months, making it impassable. Another possible reason for the slight reduction is the fact that gasoline became cheaper and the people started traveling again out of the I.os Angeles basin. This, in effect, reduces the vehicular traffic in cur area. This trend will reverse as prices will eventually continue their upward trend. The state highways comprise about 4 percent of the total roadways in the City of Huntington Beach. As in past years, these state highways account for a disproportionate amount of collisions when compared with the non -state highl,,ays in the city. For example, in 1981, 42 percent of the fatal collisions occurred on the two state highways. In 1982, the figure was 22 percent of the fatalities and 23 percent of the injury collisions. This is an alarming figure, considering these highways only make up 4 percent of the total highways withiA the city. Beach Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway also show a higher percentage of collisions where the driver was intoxicated. Eleven percent of the collisions involved an intoxicated driver, compared to 9 percent for the rest of the city. This problem is very clear. These state highways, which provide access to the state beaches, comprise only 4 percent of our total roadway miles, vet account for 22 percent of our fatalities, 23 percent of our injuries, and have a higher percentage of alcohol involvement. This clearly shows that special enforcement is urgently needed along these highways. ACCIDENT RECAP - ALL R(]MVAYS IN I-RWINGTON BEACH T/C 1980 1981 1982 M IMS 13 26 18 INJURIES 1179 1346 1261 PROPERTY MG 5111 2899 2819 TOTAL 43^3 4271 4098 PCF/DUI 339 = 8% 368 = 9% 379 = 9% of total of total of total PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY - SR1 BEACH RIND. - SR39 1980 1981 1982 FATALS 4=310 of total T/C INJURY 346=29% total T/C PROPERTY DIG 768=25% total T/C PCF/DUI 108=10% total T/C 11=421, of total T/C 4=22% of total T/C 375=28% total T/C 295=23% total T/C 661=23% total T/C 640=23% total T/C 132=13% total T/C 99=11% total T/C OTs-r-1 (Rev. 6/71) fei..fs�.:Sit7ii'?f�it7•i?.-t�.��t�`.:.\='•ta�."'Ti;'.vryi;:, ,.e:...,:z��:.:Yr:."_ca .. ... .... �.c�_, :t^.- a� -'_�_ ._ �,__�._..—�--- — -- PART I - I tem is 3. SCHEDULE A PROJECT MZSCRIPTIO;J Mother problem that we are experiencing is in record keeping within the 'Traffic Bureau. Both computer systems that we arc currently using to input collision reports are not user-friendly or user -defined. It is true that there is an extreme amount of data in these systems, but getting that data out quickly, at the user level, is almost impossible. it seems that the systems were set up for someone other than the user. It's a one-way street; all in and very little out Yor the user. Currently, we are still relying on the antiquated method of posting, by hand, log books to record the collisions. This is the only way the needed infonnition can be kept at hand and "quickly" available to the user. To search for any collision, one must hand -search the log book, page by page, which is very time- consuming. To do any statistical research requires hours of hand -searching or clays waiting for SWIMS. A personal computer that is user -defined and user- friendly could fill this gap for the required in-house use that we don't enjoy with the existing mass storage systems. The personal computer could also be used for accident reconstruction where it becomes necessary to establish "gross negligence" on the part of the drinking drivel- to obtain successful prosecution for manslaughter. Also, since the courts have started filing second degree murder against drinking drivers who have also shown malice, coupled with "gross negligence," accident reconstruction becomes even more important. There are approximately 20 to 30 formulas avail- able to the reconstructionist. The use of the formulas is necessary to establish pre -collision speeds and therefore necessary to establish 1L bility and gross negligence. For successful prosecution of the drinking driver in severe collisions, it is absolutely necessary to establish gross negligence and malice beyond a reasonable doubt. With the use of existing software, recon- struction can be done in a few hours instead of days. The problem is again clear. What is needed is a small, inexpensive, user- definAd, user-friendly personal computer to fill the gap between the current systems. It is also needed for the successful prosecution of the drinking driver in the severe cases where reconstruction is necessary. ATM IPTS TO SOLVE ME PROBLEM A. In February, 1973, in cooperation with the Orange County Alcohol Traffic Safety Project (OCATS), the Ikmtington Beach Police Department entered into an agreement to function as a contract city for the purpose of identification and apprehension of alcohol -related driving offenses. The thmtington Beach Police Department agreed to increase its table of organization by two sworn officers and apply the increased manpower exclusively to the apprehension of drinking drivers. Accident times were placed into increments to determine when the highest percentage of accidents was occurring. Upon averaging all DUI accidents for 1972, it was ascertained that the time period when 76 percent of *Urinki.ng driver accidents occurred was 1700-0300 hours. oTs-r-1 (Fpv. . 6/71) E_ V] PART 1 - Stem 6 Average 1973, 74, 75, 76 • SCHEDULE A PROJECT n.:SCRIPTioti 1976/1977 GOALS RESULTS � Traffic Accidents 834 1,1.44 -S% +37% Issiumce of Cites 7,361 7,491 +10% +18% DUI Arrests 572 740 +SO% +29% In summary, the two previous attempts to solve the problem (Project ASAP and Project STEP) both succeeded to the degree that the productivity statistics were high; however, they failed to meet the quantitative goals of the projects because of imcentrollable circtrnstances such as in_reased population, roadway miles, vehicle registration and traffic flow patterns. C. n October, 1977, the city r•:!ceived a grant from OTS for the implementa- tion of a Selective Enforcement Team. This team consisted of three motor officers, two car officers and one supervisor. They were deployed in the most efficient manner, based on prior accident expedience. The overall objective of the Project was to reduce the number of accidents and injuries. The Traffic Bureau personnel were increased by five persons so as not to affect other operations within the bureau. At the conclusion, the added personnel were retained within the bureau, per the conditions of the grant. The goals of this project were to reduce the collisions by 10 percent and increase the i-,- ::nce of citations by 10 percent and to increase the DUI arrests by 21 percent. The results of the latest- project fell short of the goals by about 12 percent with regard to the reduction of collisions. This was because of uncontrollable circumstances such as increased population, roach%nay miles, vehicle registration, traffic flow patterns and an above normal rainfall (27"/ 32") . 4. PROJECT OBJECTIVL-S The primary objective of this project will be to bring about a reduction in the deaths, injuries, and property damage due to traffic accidents along the 16 miles of state highways within hu:ntington Beach. This will be done by selectively enforcing the traffic laws, including the enforcement of the 55 W11 speed limit, accident investigation and accident reconstruction with the use of a personal computer. Special emphasis will be placed on the detection and arrest of the drinking driver. The officers assigned will work c,:.ly on the two state highways for the duration of the grant. 'rho team will consist of two accident investigation officers in radio cars and two motor officers. M 1 officers will be assigned on a volunta n• overtime basis. The team will work 10-hour shifts, four days a week. The �- hours of deployment will be flexible and will be determined by prior A;iccident experience. Grant monies will be used to purchase two equipped vehicles, four radar units, and a personal computer system, including softu-,irc- CTS - r- l , • l .•' 1 • 0 E -1 SCHEDULE A PROJECT 7 SCRIPTION PAV 1 - Item 6 After analysis of existing information, a decision was reached to utilize.• saturation patrol. 'Ihe agreement called for additional officers (2), which represented 80 min -hours per week. 'Ihis 80 hours was utilized to deploy two officers on Wednesdays and 'Ibursdays between the hours of 2200 and 0300, a total of 60 hours per week. Basically, three motor officers and three officers utilizing patrol units were assigned to ASAP duty so as to facilitate rmax inaun mobility and transportation ability. 'I11c officers selected to work ASAP were given additional training in the area of alcohol and its physical and psychological effects and alcohol -related offenses. 'Training in report wr-ting, courtroom testimony and breathalyzer were also provided. County, city and state agencies having expertise in related areas were utilized for instniction purposes. This method of operation proved to be very effective and was utilized throughout the entire ASAP Program, with the turnover of personnel the only change. B. In December of 1976, the Huntington Beach Police Department entered into an agreement with OTS to function as a contract city for the purpose of a special traffic enforcement patrol during peak times with special emphasis directed toward high accident -producing areas and the detection of and arrest of the drinking driver. The overall object of the project was to reduce the number of accidents and the number of persons injured or killed during the project timatable. The Huntington Beach Police Department implemented extra traffic enforcement b%' the utilization of four special two -man teams comprised of one traffic motor officer and one patrol officer. Manpower was provided on an overtime basis with allotted personr.A . No additional personnel were added by this project.. The teams were equipped with radar units and were deployed in a manner in line with traffic accident data. The project ran -from December 10, 1976, to March 31, 1977, and compiled the following statistics: I (OURS WORKED 2,757 MILES DRIVSN PRIMARY COLLISION VIOLATIONS DUI 30 , 20►1 1,491 The objectives and quantitative goals of this project were to: 248 1. Reduce by 5 percent the number of accidents within the jurisdiction of the City of Huntington Beach. Z. To increase by 10 percent the issuance of primary collision violations. 3. To increase by 50 percent the arrests of drinking drivers over the corresponding period of the preceding three-year average. 0T_-F-I (!ie . 6/7J) SCHEDULE A PRDJECT PSCRIPTION PART I - Item G PHASE IV - With grant monies, purchase two HR-8 handheld radars and two IiR-12 moving radar units. The vehicles and necessary equipment will be purchased through the normal procedures by the cities purchasing depart- ment. The microcomputer and software will be first, approved by the Data Processing Steering Committee and squired through the purchasing depart- ment. PHASE V - Traffic enforcement will he implem^rrted during late evening nurse, four days a week. PHASE VI - Concurrent with IV & V will be the utilization of an accident review officer for the purpose of providing office support. This officer will be a qualified expert in accident reconstruction and will use the personal computer for record keeping as well as reconstruction. f PHASE VII - Evaluation of the project will be done at the end of the project. The evaluation will be based upon the data collected throughout the project implementation. The evaluation will include a discussion of thosc areas of the Project which were both successful and unsuccessful and recommendations as to the changes which might imProve further implementation of this type of project by this or other agencies. 0. TIM'. REQUIRED - The proposed time period for the project is 12 months. 7. STAT3-TENT OF INTINT - It is the intent of the Iltmtington Beach Police I)cpartment to continue the program as part of an ongoing operational activity to the extent permitted by local budgetary constraints. I S. PROJECT' PERsoNwr:L - For the purposes of this grant, the project director shall be the Mief of Police. The project coordinator will be the Traffic Bureau Commander, Lieutenant Reinholtz. All the personnel will be regularly employed by the Rtntington Beach Police Department. 11 PAT I - Item G S. SCHEDULE A Pr3JECT i+,.; Ci1PTICN' The objective and quantitative goals of this project are to reduce by 5 percent the number of accidents along those portions of Beach Boulevard _Uld Pacific Coast Highway that are within the jurisdiction of the City of Huntington Beach; to increase by 10 percent the issuance of citations; and to increase by 10 percent the arrests of drinking drivers over t..0 corresponding period of the preceding three-year average. The duration of the project is 12 months, at which time these goals should he achieved. NERIOD OF PROCEDURE In order to meet the objectives and goals of this project, the Hhmtington Beach Police Department will fol.low the below listed steps or phases: PHASE I Analyze existing automated traffic record reports to assess t oTi'se areas along the state highways where selective enforcement may best be utilized. Primary assessment will occur just prior to October, 1983. Reassessment will be an ongoing process which will include the use o. the new personal computer system that will have a user-friendly data base and storage. This process will continue throughout the entire timetable. P11A.SC II Primary publicity will be handled by the Department's Public Relations Bureau. Publicity will. be an ongoing process throughout the project. The program shall be publicized to the community by making public presentations to service clubs, community organizations, home- owners' groups, the city's Neighborhood Watch organization, and through the news media. a. Develop safe driving slide presentations for in-house library. 2. Prepare safe driving literature in the form of bulletins, newsletters, posters and other miscellaneous handouts. 3. Provid for an alcohol workshop to be given at various service organizations. This workshop will include a Practical demonstration of the breathalyzer test. 4. Safe driving literature distributed and posted at popular gathArings. S. Presentation and design of commtmity information literature will be coordinated through the Cormnm item Relations Unit in conjunction with the Neighborhood Watch Program. P11ASE III Personnel will be generated by an overtime list posted M the 'rairic BureaL. In the event of insufficient bureau personnel, the list will be open to all personnel. SCHEDULE A-1 Priority Statement - Explain what type of priority this project has in your ,jurisdiction. Traffic safety has always been a high priority for the city council, city administrator and the City of Huntington Beach. Programs directed towards saving lives and improving the safety of our s~:-eets for the citizens is of the utmost importance. 77his project will he a top priority for the City of Huntington Beach. I Aqency Contribution - Explain what services or funds are bei►ig contributed by your 4aency in support of this project. i 'llie citi, of Ihtntington Beach will con'_rihute all neces!�:-ry administrativc services of tenth the f i n7nce and police department . .. .., l 1 ptut,.: aL, .,li i . inc.iuding a sergeant to the I team. ` 2. The city will provide an accident review officer who will also be a j qualified expert in accident reconstruction. f 3. All specialized items of equipment necessary for this project, not to f Tic, purchased with the grant monies, will lie stipplied by the city. 4. Office space and office equipment will he si:pplied. The city will utilize its existing Court I.iaison Clerk for the follow through of the complaint procedure. 6. the city will utilize, its present office personnel to :administer the clerical I` duties of tho project. DT33-'F"1. (p-v . 6/71) PersonnelA. • POSITIONS , • , SALARIES Officers Al2.13 hr x 2080•f 2 Motor Officers '1 hours x 2 9812S9.20 n 1902320.00 Bmployce Benefits 5i �4 w Court` :1 11,770.40 19809.60 31 rEMPLOYEE . r r To ai Personnel •_ Costs e 7_ 13. Travel Expense Total Travel, Expense Ir • r .r4 Si.�•C. 4 � ' y r ♦ �� `r ; r -� ~ ••* • • - �� • ,fir �i i •, ��'� . "•w '�� � .,K N � ', 1 ' . - i,w � :' .Y '` � i• ` _ _ T - - * , µ. # '1.. 4. ,�► ,� / r ` f ', - ,.h ,, rIl j+ :fit fit r - •. _ +. '+i _ .' t u,• f1► � ♦ i� • » may,. � -tr, ' __...t.l�. i • ! -� nL�.�, ,7+1- -l.. ,74 Y• --�4,,. a� .� Jry,y�' , • 4•J. ��T S1 y .��}�-Y _ t. iT'r'rr�,�'• CMIEDUU, B RUdgeL f-sti.inato W.D.A.T.R. ART I - Item 7 BudRQt Detail Cost Category 1" stim�. Z-al Total Co- I'le 2 t'y 1-y- To Pro jer D. Non ExpenMe 1i:;6Ter-t-�f 2 1983 Cliev Impala 4 111r S11V $201000.00 Black fi hlhite 2 11otorola Two-way Radios 5,400.00 2 Mohile Data Terminals 8,000.00 2 Light Bar.,; 1,450.00 2 Siren Assemblies 600.00 2 1-fR-R fLadars 3,I52.92 2 M- 12 Radars 4,911.94 I MiC I-OCOTITPLI ter, 16 b-it,128K 5,298.94 RANi,8" Disk (1.25Nib), WCRT 1 Printer, w/graphic and 2,114.70 letter quality mode Total lion Expendable $50,927.96 9 27. 0 OtherDirestCosts XT-.11TCLE EXPENSES Motorcycles 33,20 miles at $.20 mile 6)6S6.00 Automobiles .3i,280 miles at 5.24 mile 7,987.20 Total Other Direct Costs $14,64.3). 20 ],1, 6 F. Indirect Costs Sta 1 Yndirec, Co,t,,; TOTAL BUDGET rSTTHATE All CategorieF, MW j fj "'w 14 711 -P U. f 1, A SCHEDULE B-1. Budget Narrative A. PERSONWEL COSTS Ihe Alcohol netecti.on in Accident Investigation and Reconstruction Team will consist of four members: two accident investigators and two motor officers. The team will work a four -day, 10-hours-per-day week during the project. llic accident investigators and motor officers will be assigned on a voltmtary overtime basis. Per the existing contract, these officers will be paid at the overtime rate of time and one-half. The salary rate for a senior motor officer is $15.75 per hour or $23.62 per hour at the overtime ra to . The salary rate for a senior police officer is $14.75 per hour or $22.13 per hour at the overtime rate. Employee benefits are based on an average cost as follows: PERS picked up by the City 70 Retirement 16.6% Holiday Pay 4% Medical Insurance 7% Dental Insurance 1.7% L.T.D. 1.70 Va=.:�iion Pay 7 0 Un, iorm Pay 10 Wo-J mcn' s Comp 6 % Wucat ion Pay 8 % 13. COURT APPEARANCE C. 'Ilse amount of court time will be limited to those cases where violators chose to plead not guilty to citations and to which the officer is subpoenaed to appear. Ilie cost of court time is figured on an overtime basis. The policy of the lhintington Beach Police Department is that luny amount of time under four hours spent in court, or on call for court, is paid for a full four hours minimum on an overtime basis. I -or time in excess of four hours, the actual hours worked will be compensated on an overtime basis. 'Ihe total hours for court was estimated at 160 hours. Of this time, 80 hours was allotted to motor officers and 80 hours to the traffic officers. OTiIER DIRECTED COSTS In order to maintain the vehicles used under this project, the city will need to keep the vehicles supplied with gas, oil, tires, and regular maintenance checks. In fiscal fear 82/83, the cost per mile for patrol cars was calculated at 24 cents por male. The cost per mile for motorcycles was calculated at 20 cents per mile. The estinmted mileage for the vehicles is 16,640 miles each. A,l C� - \1PC� OTS-r-1 (:r-' I "I) . 5cH1JnuL1 $-1 Budget Narrative NON -RAIDED COSTS The following is an estimate of the cost of the services to be borne by the city. Salaries listed include estimated employce benefits of 620. TRAFFIC i.IFUTENANT/PROJECTED COORDINATOR - 6 man days 0 $352.00/diy = t2l]2.02 TRAFFIC SFRCF;ANT/PROJECT SUPERVISOR - I00 man days 0 $328.53/day = $32,853.6 9 ACCIDENT REVIEW OFFICER/RFCONSTRUCTTaNTST - 150 man days 0 $225.10/day=,33.765.00 POLKE CLERK/CI,F'.RICAI. DITTTFS - 24 nan days @ $93.12/clay = $2235.11 Other costs to be ftmded by the city include basic office supplies; computer tables, computer maintenance, and computer paper. These costs are estimated to be approximately $5,000.00 Total estimated non-ftmded costs: $75,965.82 • f OTS-F-1 (Roo - r 7, ) SCHEDULE C Project Time a;i\-i £xoenditure Schedule 4-J '^'c o .a s, c, 0.,_Tonal 1 V) ri b H N Project Cost By Task r C � 312 ,.320. 84 66,571.16 ----- 378,892.00 IT+v-`:-L Z 3 4 I II III IV V VI VI I Vill Salarie Court Time Vehicle Taint. Purchas _ Q.21 - 7$.'080.21 $ 0$0,.2.1 _ 55,588.76 3,660.80 3,660.80 3,660.80 - --. Quarterly Costs 133,668.97 81,741.01 81,741.01 81,741.01 214,409.98 296,150.99 377,892.00 378,892.00 �ir�� Cumulative Quarterly Costs 133,608.97 I I otch©dule E - 1hi1IAL r.VA1,vh4'10?, Dn.i: A.1).A.I .1\1. 15a (Police Traffic Services) Agency:_ lKmt ington Beach 3 Years Ago: 19 2 Years AE. 19 last Year 19____, Brie Year Start Date: Jan 1 Apr 3 Jul 1 Oct 1 Jan 1 Apr 1 Jul 1 Oct 1 Jan l Apr 1 Jul 1 Oct I Jan 1 Apr 1 Jul 1 G:t 3 Com lotion Date: Ma.r31 Jun3O Sep30 9re31 P.a.r3a. Jurr30 Se 3J Dec31 Mar31 Jun30 Se 30 Dcc3 M r31 Jun30 Se 30 Doc33 Fatal (total) 4 1 2 4 1 3 6 1 2 1 5 1 13 2 4 1 17 1 5 4 12.0 ( 5.3 1 7 A bicyclist 0 1 0( 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 j 0 0 0 1 (► 1 0 0 1 0 I 0 I 0 C pedestrian 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 I 0 1 2, 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 .66 .6611.66 1 0 x motorcyclist 2 1 0( 0 { 0 2 ' O j 2 2 0 1 0 1 i 1 1.3.), 0 I l I 1 E Injury (total) 288 1344 i 22 3 i 324 300 ` 396 364 1 286 264 ' 316 ' 369 1 312 284 352 1317 1 307 N bicyclist -9 I 40 1 49 22 33 1 44 I 29 1 26 36 45 1 60 i 45 33 43 1 46 1 " T pedestrian 14 ( 20 1 22 28 8 i 20 18 17 i 11 1 7 8 35 55 I 39 I S motorcyclist 1 1 I 1 , 1 1 1 I Property Damage Only 7O7 I 784 844 1776 ," I 12 'figg 68.) 761 ,779 721 DWI (PCF 23101 & 2310 84 1 1 1 ] 02 j 83 93 ; 91 1122 78 78 ; 108 1 83 ; 110 85 99 1102 1 90 E Agcy Total Citations 7466 I j ( 7911 { 77 35 8178 , 0157 1 1 9a?2 �7189 7511 I I 1 1 9027 8051 i7342 1 718 j I 94G5; 8428 I 7422 N 19210 1 1 1 I F Agcy Haz. Citations 4970 I 1 1 437, 5387 5682 1 i 6434 1 � 5988 15565 5730 1 1 7079 I 5718115659 1 5461 1 63431,5361 I1 I SS37 0 15516 1 � R -Agcy 23101 & 23102 1 E l Arrests 639 637 527 i 475 496 j 502 395 400 382 397 3011 371 506 5121 431 415 I M ( 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 E Agey Speed Citations T 18 18 15 1 AGENCY EPIFC MIENT INDEX 17 1 16 1 14 1 1 / 17 1 16 16 16 21 2 2 15 i 18 -- POPULATION 170,500 172,2813 178,000 MILES OF PATROLLED ROADWAY 353 362 362 Pop. Acci. Rate 0 I14 (TTS k;-15a (revised 3/78) INSTRUCTIONS ON RMER iF • 0 SCHEDULE D Project Task and Cast Category SL=ar For Rr,ant Year o: 83/84 • C 0 S T C A T E G O R Y OTS Project AWP STD/ Personnel Tavel Contractual Non Expend- ether Direct Tndirect Total Casts :-�:ase SEP E TASK Costs Expense Services able = ' Costs Costs By T&3R z II III 312,320.84 312,320.84 IV 51,927.96 14,643.20 66,571.16 V V VI VII VIII `OTC 312,3Z0.84 511927.96 1•1,64.i.2U 378,892.00 a 0 State of California Business and Transportation Agency OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY CERTIFICATION OF NON -DUPLICATION OF GRANT FUND EXPE14DITURE This is to certify that the 5�66-04-At7-94;-gy/c7.Vy/4al4g-r-�uz.rxnUcx, ez;c. has no ongoing or completed projects under agreement with TOPICS, CCC.T (LEAA), HEW, or other federal fund sources, which duplicate or overlap any work contemplated or described in this Traffic Safety Project titled,_ (AD� ALCOHOL DETECTION IN ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION & RECONSTRUCTION It is further agreed that any pending or proposed request for ether federal grant funds which would duplicate or overlap work under this Traffic Safety Project, will be revised to exclude any such duplication of grant fund expenditures. It is understood that any such duplication of federal fund expenditures subsequently determined by audit will be subject to recovery by the Office of Traffic Safety. CERTIFIED llf r /P7�- agna L Ur arl es Thompson CITY ADMINISTRATOR Type NaiFe and -Title 4/20/83 Date OTS-F-37 Rev, 11/76 California Traffic Safety Program Equal Opportunity Assurance with Regard to the Highway Safety Program Pursuant to the requirements of Title VI provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the S•tat-e- -Age�y/City/C-o*Rt�u of HUNT1 GTON BEACH acting through its chief administrative officer, desiring to avail itself of the benefits of Chapter 1, Title 23, United States Code, and as a condition to obtaining the approval of the Secretary of Transportation and Governor of California of any highway safety projects as provided for in Title 23, United States Code, Section 105(a), hereby gives its assurance that all provisions of Equal Opportunity Assurance with regard to the Highway Safety Program stated in Exhibit G of the California Traffic Safety Program Grant Program Manual Volume II will be complied with fully. SIGNATURE ;ly14 ► 1: City/c � H 1NT.� ING1"ON BEACH OTS-F-24 Rev. 11/76 s California Traffic Safety Program Application of the Hatch Act to State and Local Agencies Receiving Funds Under the Highway Safety Act of 1966 This is to certify that all employees of this agency whdse principal employment is in connection with any Highway Safety Project financed in whole or in part by loans or grants under the Highway Safety Act of 1966 has been made aware of the pro- visions of Section 1%(a) of the -itch Act (5.U.S.C. 118k(a)). SIGNATURE: - • Project Director fkmtington Beach Police Department Agency OTS-F-23