Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (OCTA) FUND EXCHANGE - 1997-05-05 CouncillAgency Meeting Held: 4' L- 9 7 Deferred/Continued to: 5- S V Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied City Clerk'sC&gnature Council Meeting Date- April 7, 1997 Department ID Number: AS 97-013 3/S 19 7 a--,P 7 o CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator _ PREPARED BY: RAY SILVER, Assistant City Administr for LES JONES, Public Works Directo ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administ to SUBJECT: EXCHANGE AGREEMENT - OCTA Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental S4Attachmnt(s) Statement of Issue: To consider an agreement with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) whereby up to $4.5 million per year of City General Fund revenue would be exchanged for an equal amount of OCTA Gas Tax revenue. Recommended Action: Approve the attached agreement between the Orange County Transportation Authority and the City of Huntington Beach for Fund Exchange and authorize the City Administrator to execute the agreement. Background: In February 1996, the City of Huntington Beach along with several other local jurisdictions, the County of Orange, and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) agreed to a consensus plan to finance the County of Orange's bankruptcy Plan of Adjustment. As a result, state legislation was adopted which provides for a shift of $38 million per year in sales tax revenues from the OCTA to the County of Orange for the next fifteen (15) years. The diverted sales tax revenues were previously utilized by OCTA to fund public bus service and represented 50 percent of OCTA's annual budget for this service. The shift of revenue was not intended to result in reduced transit services. Realizing residents in each City would be affected by a loss in public bus service, the Orange County Division of the League of Califomia Cities, the OCTA, and the County of Orange agreed to annually shift $23 million of County gas tax revenues to OCTA. However, the State Constitution limits the use of these funds, and they'+,c nnot be used for bus operations. I Faced with the potential loss of public bus service in Orange unty, a bankruptcy committee composed of City Managers from various Orange County`cities proposed an exchange of funds between OCTA and cities in the County. Under this proposal, cities in Orange County would give a portion of their General Fund revenues to OCTA in exchange for an equal amount of gas tax revenues. �1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: AS 97-013 The City staff from Public Works and Administration have been working together with OCTA to prepare an agreement setting the details of the proposed exchange of funds and outlining each agency's requirements under the agreement. A copy of the proposed agreement is attached. Analysis: Cities are required to allocate part of their General Fund revenues to fund street maintenance and improvements in order to remain eligible to receive Measure "M" funds (Maintenance of Effort or "MOE"). The City of Huntington Beach currently has an annual MOE requirement of $4.5 million. A portion of the City's MOE General Fund moneys are proposed to be exchanged for an equal amount of OCTA gas tax revenues. Under the proposed exchange of funds agreement, the annual amount of General Fund revenues to OCTA would be determined by the annual City budget, beginning October 1, 1997, with an upper limit equal to the City's MOE ($4.5 million). The proposed agreement requires OCTA to use the Cities' General Funds for public bus service operations and for the City to use the Gas Tax funds for our MOE requirement. The proposed agreement states that the estimated amount of Huntington Beach's General Fund revenues eligible for exchange with OCTA is subject to the availability of such revenues and limited by the appropriation of such funds by the City Council in the annual budget. The proposed agreement also provides for the termination of the agreement with a six month written notice by either party. The cities of Orange, Santa Ana, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, Costa Mesa, Laguna Beach and Anaheim, and the Southern California Regional Rail Association (Metrolink), have all approved the agreement for their respective agencies. The exchange of funds between OCTA and the cities is a major component of the County bankruptcy plan. Through this cooperative effort, the City of Huntington Beach and other participating cities will assist OCTA in avoiding a major reduction in public bus services to all Orange County residents. The fund exchange agreement may increase interest earnings to the City because OCTA's deposits will precede City payments to OCTA. OCTA has agreed to pay for any additional audit and reporting costs associated with the fund exchange agreement. The agreement would become effective in October of 1997. Funding Source: General Fund and OCTA gas tax funds. Fijcal lm act: As described. Alternative Action(,g): If the City decides not to approve the agreement, it may result in a financial hardship to OCTA if other agencies cannot be found to enter into the exchange program. OCTARCA.DOC -2- 03/24/97 12:11 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: April 7, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: AS 97-013 Environmental Status: Does not apply. City Clerk's Page Number 1. Summary - Proposed Gas Tax Exchange 2. Legal Opinion -OCTA Attorney 3. State Controller Approval Letter 4. Exchange Agreement OCTARCA.DOC -3- 03/24/97 12:11 PM 7 1 Page 10 - Council/Agency-Agenda -05/05/97 (10) E-9 (City Council) Orange Coast Marketing Coalition Agreement Between County Of Los Angeles, County Of Orange, State Of California & Various Cities -To Solicit Funding] Equipment Etc For Beach Maintenance, Parking & Lifeguard Operations (600.40) - Approve the Orange Coast Marketing Coalition Agreement between the City and Los Angeles County, Orange County, State of California and the cities of Newport Beach, Laguna Beach, and San Clemente and authorize execution by the Mayor and City Clerk. Submitted by the Community Services Director [Approved 7-0] E-10. (City Council) Deferred From April 21, 1997 -Agreement- Between City And Orange County Transportation Authority - For Fund Exchange (600.25) -Approve and authorize execution by the Mayo f[City Administrator lantl City Clerk of the Agreement between the City and Orange County Transportation Authority for Fund Exchange. Submitted by the Deputy City Administrator, Administrative Services. Public Works Director. and Assistant City Administrator [Approved 7-0] E-11. (Redevelopment Agency) "Approval As To Form" Of Office Space Lease Between Abdelmuti Development Company And Clearview Capital Corporation -Ocean View Promenade -101 Main Street (600.30) -Approve as to Form the Office Space Lease between Abdelmuti Development Company as Landlord and Clearview Capital Corporation as Tenant for office space within the Oceanview Promenade. Submitted by the Economic Development Director [Approved 6-1 -- (Sullivan -- NO)] E-12. (City Council) Approval Of Planning Staff Recommendation That Revised Conditional Use Permit No. 96-79 &Variance No. 96-27 Be Referred To The Planning Commission For Public Hearing -Three Story House - 18741 Jockey Circle -s/w Ellis Avenue & Saddleback Lane - In Connection With Appeal Of Planning Commission's Denial Of Said Permits (420.40) - Refer revised Conditional Use Permit No. 96-79 (C.U.P.) and Variance No. 96-27 to the Planning Commission for public hearing. Appellant: Gilda Keshavarzian & Mahavesh Keyvanazar; Applicant: Gilda Keshavarazian; Request: To refer a revised plan to the Planning Commission for their consideration. The revised plan is for an 8,587.square feet, two story, 35 foot high, single family dwelling with variances to permit an eight (8) foot setback in lieu of minimum 50 feet and to exceed the maximum two (2) foot cut and fill grading limitation. The revised plan eliminates the need for the original height variance. Location: 18741 Jockey Circle (at the terminus of Jockey Circle, southwest of Ellis Avenue and Saddleback Lane); and Environmental Status: Categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. The tentative Planning Commission hearing date is May 13, 1997. Submitted by the Community Development Director [Approved 7-0] (10) AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR FUND EXCHANGE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of �2� , 1997 by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and the Orange County Transportation Authority, a public corporation of the State of,California (hereinafter referred to as "AUTHORITY"). WHEREAS, the County of Orange and other local jurisdictions within the county, including CITY and AUTHORITY, entered into a Joint Agreement for Resolution of Claims Against the County of Orange ("JOINT AGREEMENT"); and The JOINT AGREEMENT includes provisions supporting legislation to provide funds to finance an acceptable plan of adjustment in the County of Orange bankruptcy case; and State legislation provided the shift of$38,000,000 per year of Bradley- Burns sales tax revenues, used by AUTHORITY to pay for public bus services, to the County of Orange commencing July 1, 1996 and ending June 30, 2011; and the shift of$23,000,000 per year of fuel tax revenues to AUTHORITY from the County of Orange commencing July 1, 1997 and ending June 30, 2013; and The $23,000,000 of fuel tax revenues shifted to AUTHORITY may not be used to pay for public bus service operations as defined by Article XIX of the State Constitution; and CITY annually appropriates general fund or other local revenues for Article XIX authorized transportation projects, and said local revenues may be used to pay for public bus services; and AUTHORITY and CITY jointly desire to sustain public bus service levels in Orange County through a cooperative effort; and 1 Agree/OCTA/r1s97-192/3/24/97 G�^��, ,��� �• / AUTHORITY AND CITY desire to exchange AUTHORITY fuel tax revenues for CITY local revenues beginning September 30, 1997 to sustain public bus service levels in Orange County: NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed by AUTHORITY and CITY as follows: 1. Prior to March 1 of each year AUTHORITY will provide CITY written notification requesting an exchange of AUTHORITY fuel tax revenues for CITY revenues that shall be available to pay for bus services (hereinafter referred to as "local revenues") for the fiscal year commencing the following October 1. 2. Prior to July 1 of each year CITY will provide AUTHORITY an estimate (hereinafter referred to as "ESTIMATE") of local revenues CITY anticipates spending for Article XIX authorized transportation projects during the following fiscal year. 3. Prior to August 1 of each year AUTHORITY and CITY will agree on an amount to be exchanged and AUTHORITY will provide a confirmation letter to CITY establishing the amount of fuel tax revenues to be exchanged for local revenues (hereinafter referred to as "EXCHANGE AMOUNT") during the following fiscal year. The EXCHANGE AMOUNT may be equal to or less than the amount of the ESTIMATE provided by CITY to AUTHORITY. 4. Beginning October 31, 1997, and on the last working day of each month thereafter, AUTHORITY shall deposit one-twelfth of the EXCHANGE AMOUNT in fuel tax revenues in a CITY account as directed by CITY. 5. Beginning December 31, 1997, and on the last working day of March, June, September and December, thereafter, CITY shall deposit 25 percent of the EXCHANGE AMOUNT in local revenues in an AUTHORITY account as directed by AUTHORITY. 6. The EXCHANGE AMOUNT may be adjusted upward or downward during the fiscal year as agreed to by both parties. Corresponding adjustments may be made to remaining or future quarterly and monthly deposits. 2 Ag ree/OCTAlrls97-192W6197 7. AUTHORITY agrees that the fuel tax revenues received by CITY and expected by CITY shall be used toward satisfying CITY's Measure M maintenance of effort requirement. 8. CITY and AUTHORITY mutually agree that the fuel tax revenues received from AUTHORITY shall only be used as authorized by Article XIX of the California Constitution, and applicable California law, and that the local revenues received by AUTHORITY shall be used to pay for public bus service operations. 9. AUTHORITY agrees to fund any reasonable costs CITY may incur due to additional audit requirements caused by this exchange of local revenues for fuel tax revenues. Any additional audit costs will be mutually agreed to by both parties, and corresponding adjustments will be made to monthly deposits by AUTHORITY to CITY to account for the additional audit costs. 10. Nothing in this AGREEMENT will limit the CITY's ability to request a review of its Maintenance of Effort level consistent with the Measure M Ordinance. 11. This AGREEMENT shall be effective on the date of full execution and continues each fiscal year thereafter unless either party provides the other party with no less than six months written notice of the effective termination date. This AGREEMENT shall terminate effective July 1, 2013. 12. AUTHORITY acknowledges that the estimate provided by CITY to AUTHORITY pursuant to Paragraph 2 of this AGREEMENT is merely an estimate by the staff of CITY. Any amounts to be exchanged by CITY pursuant to the AGREEMENT are subject to and limited by the appropriation of such amounts by the City Council in the annual budget of CITY which budget is not necessarily adopted by CITY until October 1 st of each calendar year or thereafter. 13. This AGREEMENT will be amended at the request of CITY should AUTHORITY approve or amend a gas tax exchange agreement with any other city to include provisions which CITY believes are more favorable than the terms of this AGREEMENT. 3 AgreefOCTAlrGs97-1 9 213124197 14. If as a result of(a) a final judgment with respect to this AGREEMENT (or any substantially identical agreement of AUTHORITY with another city), (b) Legislation or (c) any administrative regulation or order, it is determined that the exchange of revenues provided for herein is invalid for any reason whatsoever and that CITY must make restitution to AUTHORITY of any or all fuel tax revenues which it has received hereunder, AUTHORITY shall return to CITY simultaneously with any CITY restitution, the amount of funds which had been transferred by CITY to AUTHORITY pursuant to this AGREEMENT. In the event CITY's funds have been expended for bus service or any other expense of AUTHORITY, AUTHORITY shall reimburse CITY from any other available funds. Should CITY itself be the subject of any judicial, legislative or administrative challenges to the AGREEMENT, AUTHORITY shall upon demand by CITY indemnify and hold harmless CITY from any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs or expenses whatsoever which CITY may incur by reason of or in connection with this AGREEMENT. 15. Notification and mailing addresses: Any notices, requests and demands made between the parties pursuant o this AGREEMENT are to be directed as follows: If to AUTHORITY: 550 S. Main Street P.O. Box 14184 Orange, CA 92863-1584 If to CITY: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 4 Agree/0CTA/rts97-192l3127197 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed on the date first above written. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By- mi =ator� Dated:Mic ael Ub&uaga, City Ad APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dated: Gail Hutton, City Attorney'C 3-2-1-'1 7 Lt ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By: Dated: ' Stan Oftelie, Ch f Executive Officer APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Dated:JkP2L Ke nard R. Smart, G Hera Counsel 5 Agree/0 CTA/ds97-192/3/24/97 Proposed Exchange of Funds Background Due to the County of Orange bankruptcy, state legislation shifted $38 million a year of transit funds, used by the Orange County Transportation Authonty (OCTA) to operate public bus services, to the County of Orange. As a partial offset to this loss, $23 million per year of gas tax revenues will be transferred from the County to OCTA starting July 1, 1997. The OCTA loss of transit funds will expire in Fiscal Year 2011 (15 years). The$23 million of gas tax revenues shifted to OCTA from the County are not eligible for transit service operations as defined by the State Constitution_ The shift, however, was not intended to result in reduced transit services. OCTA is working with local cities in Orange County to exchange the gas tax revenues for local revenues to provide OCTA with bus operating funds. OCTA believes it is necessary to ask other agencies to participate in the fund exchange to ensure a stable source of bus funding for the next 15 years_ Proposal The OCTA Board has directed its staff to explore opportunities for exchanging some of the gas tax revenues with the City of Huntington Beach beginning October 1997 The gas tax revenues can be used for specified City General Fund activities such as Street maintenance. OCTA would use the City General Funds to sustain its bus operations OCTA proposes exchanging up to$4.5 million a year in gas tax revenues with the City of Huntington Beach_ Basic provisions in the proposal include- • CITY and OCTA would agree to the amount exchanged each year_ • The annual exchange would be on a dollar-for-dollar basis. The exchange amount would not impact the City's decisions about what to fund or how to fund specific activities_ • The annual exchange amount may be adjusted during the fiscal year if necessary_ • OCTA would make the gas tax revenue deposits to CITY monthly starting October 1997- CITY would make the local revenue deposits to OCTA quarterly starting December 1997- This exchange could provide up to$21,000 of additional interest earnings to CITY each year. • OCTA would fund the costs of additional audit and reporting requirements if necessary_ The overall proposal is win-win for both agencies. OCTA obtains an additional partner to avoid a potential reduction in bus operations, and the City could realize up to$21,000 in additional interest earnings. Exchange of Funds Approved Bankruptcy Plan Proposed Cities -OCTA Exchange :' S38 ' $38 6UIIfOn I - - - - — _ 1 Ne' t Transit ' New Funds Funding S23 S23 ---- Million h�ilfion Gen_ for Fund $23 Buses $23 $23 Moon Milion Mahon for - - Gas .4 - - - - - Gas Sleets Tax Tax Cities OCTA County • L•w Orricrs or AODRIJFF9 SPRADLIN & SMAR A PROFMIGNAL CO MRATION 7U1 SOUTH PARKER SPRP.c-T, SUITE70W ■ ORANGE, CA 9.)W-1720 + (714) 556.7D00 ■ FAX (714) 834-7V/ I DIRECT MAL(714)564-2608 DIRECT FAX(114)565.2508 September 5, 1996 Board of Directors Orange County Transportation Authority P.O. Box 14184 Orange, CA 92613-1584 Re: Transfer of Fuel Tax Revenues Dear Directors- Section 2128 was added to the California Streets and Highways Code as a part of the 1995 legislative actions addressing the County of Orange bankruptcy Section 2128 provides for the monthly payment of$1,916,667 00 of fuel tax revenues to the Orange County Transportation Authority (Authority) for 16 years, commencing July 1, 1997. You have asked whether the Authority may transfer a portion of the fuel tax revenues to a city if the city agrees to spend the funds in compliance with applicab!e law, including Section 1 of Article XIX of the California Constitution and Section 2106 of the Streets and Highways Code, which require fuel tax revenues to be used for specific purposes (i.e., street and highway projects) Our opinion is the answer is yes. Chapter 3 of Division 3 (commencing with Section 2000) of the Streets and Highways Code governs the apportionment and expenditure of fuel tax revenues. Section 2128 provides that a specific sum of fuel tax revenues that otherwise would be apportioned to the County of Orange shall be paid to the Authority. As the recipient of these funds that would otherwise be paid to the County of Orange, the Authority is subject to the same statutes governing these funds as the County of Orange. TERRY C.ANDRUS■MARY E SA74NG•WIS 30I1LAX+RMY C.SLT=•JOHN E CAVANAUCH•CRA]G G.FARRINGM.*4 RODELL R FICK a 10SFPH W.FOR6AT}I s tam L.)FFFFl:I"9 MAODALFTA L0NA-SYIA17■THOMAS F-Na'024 S IASON k-RESNICK ]OPEN R SHAW■KENNARD R SMART,JR.9 DANK I SPFNCE■DANIEL K SYRAD ZII ■A.AN R_WA:TS ft'=ImAs L wQQD?,I'FF rct;-cam"1_ i• U1_I H U 411 40/UtV. r . i-4 >Mu 7 f V-+ r.u7• i l OCTA Board of Directors September 5, 1996 i Page 2 Section 2106.5 authorizes a county and cities within a county to enter into agreements among themselves changing their respective statutory apportionments. and directs the State Controller to comply with the contractually agreed upon apportionments. There is no specific statutory authorization for a public entity receiving fuel tax revenues to transfer its fuel tax revenues to a city for expenditure by the city. However, Section 2106.3 clearly implies the Legislature's recognition of such an authorization. Section 2106.3 requires the County of Los Angeles to make allocations of part of its fue: tax revenues to each city within the county if the County of Los Angeles elects to allocate a portion of its share of fue; tax revenues to at least 70% of the cities within the county. Clearly Section 2106.3 assumes a county has the authority to allocate (transfer) fuel tax revenues to a city because it specifies what happens f such transfers occur and a specified number of cities are recipients of such funds. We also note that the California Legislature acknowledged the contractual transfer of fuel tax revenues between recipients of fuel tax revenues when it amended Section 2106 in 1967.' We understand the County of Orange administered a program entitled the Arterial Highway Financing Program (AHFP) for many years. AHFP was a program of transfers of fuel tax revenues from the County of Orange to cities for expenditure by the recipient city for local street and highway projects. 'Section 28 of Stats. 1967, c. 1621, p. 3882, provided: "It is recognized that there are presently in existence a great number of contracts between cities, counties, the state, and others, that contain obligations relating to the administration of Sections 186.1, 194 [renumbered §§ 2106, 2107 and amended] and 2107 [added by Stats. 1947, Ist Ex.Sess., c. 11, p. 3791, § 1 (now repealed)] of the Streets and Highways Code as those sections existed prior to the effective date of this act, together with other contractual obligations not necessarily related to the administration of such sections. It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this act that all such contracts remain in full force and effect until the parties thereto have an opportunity to review and amend such contracts so as to revise the contractual obligations relating to the administration of the above sections affected by this act and to retain or revise the other contractual obligations where appropriate." 4300.00001 3474$_1 U' Iri I Lk4IAIrAG-IEU. Ij 714 560 5Y"-4 P. IU- 1. OCTA Board of Directors September 5, 1996 Page 3 The voluntary transfer of fuel tax funds from one recipient entity to another to fund necessary street and highway projects is entirely consistent with the statutes governing the fuel tax revenues which specify the purpose for use of the funds, provide a means of determining how much each entity receives, but permits the recipient entities to decide how to best expend the funds. The Authority has no direct ownership or maintenance responsibility for local street or highway projects. Such projects are undertaken by cities and the County of Orange. It is reasonable to assume the Legislature was aware of these limitations and anticipated the Authority would transfer the funds to cities and/or the County of Orange for such projects as determined locally to be appropriate. Sincerely, WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART KENNARD R. SMART, . R. cc: Stan Oftelie a'so0-oar, 29263, 34748 t , r_ K A,TH'LEEN COL,NELL Controller of the State of California Post•it'Fax Note TO January 9, 1997 ee.+deac. / DhOn�Y7L��,sfr0� �Y� P++cn9@ 7I4 -7 y Z-3-fj�7� Mr. Jeff Clark, Section Manager Orange County Transportation authority — Financial Planning & Gram Administration Post Office Box 14194 Orange, California 92613-1584 , Dear Mr. Clark: This letter is in response to.your letter dated January 7, 1997 requesting written confirmation of approval from the State Controller's Office(SCO) tepardutg your exchange of gas-tax funds with local jurisdictions. The SCO legal eounsel,has reviewed your plan for the gas tax_eXchan a and concurs with your approach_ As long as the gas tax funds are spent according to the guidelines required by the state, there will be no additional reporting requirements. While the exchange is not expressly sanctioned in Chapter 747, it appears to be consistent with the agency's broad authority in the operation of its public transportation system. As you noted,the annual gas tax apportionment is intended to partially offset other funds diverted to Orange County to:mitigate the effects of the county's banlauplcy. In making the gas tax apportionment,.it must be assumed that the l egislature uxfended that the monthly payments would not oti�y assist the Transit Authority, but also'th$t the gas tax moneys would be.used fora constitutional purpose. The exchange being negotiated appears to be consistent with what tlitrugislature intended to be accomplished,:. The Transit Authority will be assisted iin.caming on its bus operations and the-gas taxes Uill be used for road purposes. Accordingly, the exchange agreement would not appear to be legally objectionable from the standpoint of the Controller's audit responsibilities. MA[LiNG ADDRESS P.O.Box 942950, Sacramento,CA 94250 SACRAMENTO 300 Capitol Mall,Suite 1850,Sa;.ramenro,CA 95814 (916)"S-2636 LOS ANG€LES 600 Corporate Pointe, Suite 1150,Culver City,CA 90230' (310)342-5678 TOTHL P. . . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK CITY CLERK LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL REGARDING ITEM APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPNIENT AGENCY APPROVED ITEM DATE: I TO: AATTENTION W-Z(-X 11a'Uj : D• �7/�'T DEPARTMENT: s t .3-/.5�' REGARDING: City,state,Vp See Attached Action Agenda Item Date of Approval 9 Enclosed For Your Records Is An Executed Copy Of The Above Referenced Item For Your Records. Connie Brockway City Clerk Attachments: Action Agenda Page /• Agreement V Bonds Insurance RCA Deed Other Remarks: CC: 1v' Department RCA Agreement Insu Other \a DeparLment RCA, Agrccm/Snt lns aceOthd/1/zz Nam. Department RCA Agreement In Other Risk Management Department Insurance Copy G:Fo11o%%vp.!agrmts'trans1tr Telephone:714.536-5227)