Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPBQ & D INC - 1978-07-17 TASK ld REFINE MODELLING PROGRAM APPROACH This task is divided into a series of four subtasks which comprise a set of tactical discussions and decisions necessary very early in the program so that subsequent technical tasks can be undertaken as rapidJ,y as possible. The timing of this task -s critical to the overall sequence of activities ih the -modelling program Subtask 1.1 Verify Study Objectives, Priorities, and Time- frames This first subtask will bring Consultant cnd, City staffs to- gether for a joint meeting to resolve initial que-6 dons that are key to they model development process, to the timely assembly of necessary travel data, and to the intended uses of the model. Speci- fic modell i,ng objectives will. be verified and refined, if nscessarp. The manner cif categorizing by trip purpose for modelling will be detLrmint d, and base yeax anad "horizon" year(s) will be stAeuted for pla~ping purposes. Consultamt will briefly document the refined modelling objectivez; this will, assist in guidingthe model- ling program. The trip purposes chosen for analysis, and the ra+-ionale for their selection, will: also be documented. Subta2k 1.2 - Establish Data Availabilit-i in Detail in this subtask, each of several types of land use/demographic data aiii. transportation facilities data required for model develop- ment will be examined in detail. The aim of the subtask is to clarify the 'exten,t of data on file at the City that is appropriate fox incorporation into the transportation demand model Land use data considered will include the location and extent of residen- tial, commercial, and industrial activity in the City. Traffic engineering da'ca currently on file at the City will also be evalu- ated for suitability as model input. After joint City-Consultant examination of the data sources, working decisions will be reached regarding the adequacy of the existing data base. This subtask leads directly to Subtask 1..3 where the most critical data short- ages are identified. Subtask 1. 3 - Identify Most Pressing Needs for Additional Data As a consequence of Subtask 1.2, key data deficiencies will be identified as the adequacy of data typically needed for trans- portation modelling is evaluated. Where city-level data are lacking and where the use of areawide averages or representative values would be clearly unsat-Isfactory or inappropriate, the data shortage will be noted and subsequently will be considered in Subtask 1.4. Data needs may relate to any phase of the full modelling program -- model development, calibration, validation, or application. The intent of this :subtask is to identify the most �!riticai data .needs and tc specify the nature and format of the additional data desired. Subtask 1.4 Establish Data Collection Program The focus of this subtask will be on the timely as>essment and planning, with City staff, of the areas where available City forces, traffic counting equipment, etc. , ,an best be deployed to meet as many of the principal data defic er_ '.zes as possible. This gffort will necessarily recognize that any data collection effort AWL IP must be scaled against staff availability and must be geared to the points in the p_ro3ect schedule where the data are required for modelling purposes. Specdal studies recommended for inclusion in the program may include supplemental traffic volume studies, trip generation studies, vehicle occupancy studies, license plate surveys, supplemertal speed studies, cordon and screenline checks, r or 'travel time and delay runs during peak and off-peak periods. The data collection studies themselves wili be performed by Clity staff, with monitoring assistance from the Consultant. TASK 2: ESTABLISH MODELLING FRAMEWORK This task covers three technical subtasks which lead dir- ectly -to the model development actitrity in Task 3. Subt>ask 2.1 accomplishes the delineation of the study area boundary. ,;ubtask 2.2 focuses on the aisaggregation of the study area into appropri- ately-sized transportation ap_-lysis- zones. In Subtask 2.3, .base year transportation networks are built an%: checked. Subtask 2.1 Define Study Area The initial step toward zonal system definition and network specification is the establishment of a study area 'boundary which will serve to co-;don off the allea of prir,,(ary planning interest to the City. The pTMecise definition of the study area boundary will be established in consultation with City staff. It is anticipated that the study boundary will conform fairly closely to the City's ovin jurisdiction&& boundary, providing that the boundary cuts the transportation network cleanly. Study area selectIct twill take appropriate cognizance of the zonal structure currently in use in the Orange County Multimodal Transportation Study, Subtask 2.2 - Define Inte nal Zonal System Consultant shall develop, with City staff input, a suitable zonal system for the study, based upon existing bases of land use data aggregation, zone systems, and traffic analysis zones. The most appropriate means of 'aggregating blocks and tracts -t vari ous types of land uses in Huntington Beach will be determined. Factors to be considered in fixing the internal zonal system will ki.- include the areal levels at which existing land uses are summar- ized, as well, as an appropriate balance in detail between the zone system and the network developed in S- -Cask .2.3. The product of this subtask will be a complete zonal system map for. the Huntington Beach study area, showing internal zones with their re- spective rentroids. Subtask 2.3 Define, Code Base Networks This subtask encompasses a wide range of activities leading to a fully described file of transportation network data upon which the model chain can operate. . Roadway system segments will be designated for inclusion in the highway,network, based on .a det- ermination of the level of detail warranted, justified, and feasible within time and cost limitations of the project. eentroid connect- ors will be ivastaulished to connect zone centroids to the highway network. A map of the links and nodes in the network will be drawn, and link data will be coded into 'computer,-readable UTPS format. Transit will also be considered; should a transit network be deemed appropriate in view of modelling objectives, timeframes, and model specificity, a base year transit network will be created based on the transit network already establisbBd for the Orange County Multi modal Transportation Study. Within the study boundary,, Consultant, with City staff assist- ance, shall develop and code a network-reflecting the level of detail mutually agrcGd as approp„iate for this modelling effort. it is expected that City staff will assist in the coding tasks f under the supervision and direction of Consultant. Timely coding of the network data for base year is contingent upon the develop- ment of required link data (speeds, capacities, link distances, etc. ) from sources identified during Task 1. Network coding by Consultant will include keypunching of the highway link records and initial processing of the link records through screening programs (such as UTFS program HR) .to isolate potential coding errors and inconsistencies. Time permitting, one or more selected minimum path 'trees will be prepared using UTPS program UROAD. � r) Ash TASK 3: DESIGN MODELLING KETHODOLOCY This task comprises the steps necessary to develop the trans- , pottation demand model for tTte City of Huntington Beach. The model will consist of integrated procedures for p edicting �z transportation fac,,,lity data. Model components ,,ill execute trip generation, trip (Aistributiom, and traffic assignment steps, with mode split treated in the most appropriate manner deemed feasible. The model components will be structured in UTPS software but will be specially designed to facilitate separate analysis of the trip purposes of interest to the City, to accommodate the available data, and to be appropriate for the level of detail of the network and zonal system Subtask 3.1 - Detail the Model Chain The model chain is a sequence of odel steps which, when com- pleted, serves as "the transportation demand model for the City. The structure of the models will follow- a sequential process, beginning with trip generation and ending with constrained network assignment. UTpS aoftwarr_ will be employed. The product resulting from this subtas%. will be a fully speci- fied sequence cat models together with the necessary software to accept input data, call the models in the correct sequence, and outyut the model results. Subtask 3.2 Allocate Existing Land Use to Zonal ystems This subtask will p�:ovide a data set describing existing land use and socioeoonomic conditions in terms of the variables required by the model and the. study zonal system. The land use data will be provided by City staff; Consultant shall assist City staff, as 'necessary, with the allocation of land use to the zonal system. Data for the areas outside the study boundary shall be drawn L.om available data generated for the Orange County Multimodal Transportation Study. These data will come into play in modelling for the outside areas, and may serve as control totals on internal data Once data are assembled in the appropriate format, they will be coded and kaypiznched for input into the appropriate UTPS program compcne S "Mask 3.3 Calibrate. Model Components Model calibration will eritail the estimation of model para- meters against available data describing existing travel. Calibra- tion of the transpcxtation demand model will be on an average daily traffic (ADT) basis. Cal.ibrati.or, will be accomplished using selected screenline checks, using checks of tripmaking against con- trol totals from the ,Orange County Multimodal Transportation Study, and checks against independent sources of data, as appropriate. Sub-task 3.4 - ,Perform Model Validation Including_ Sensitivity Testing Model validation, like calibrat"on, will be performed on an average daily traffic basis. This subtask will establish the model's ability not only to recreate existing travel patterns but also to generate noticeable effects on the network when a sufficiently major Land use or circulation system change is introduced. Validation activities will include, as appropriate, recon- ciliation of link demands with ground counts; compression of inter- zonal trips for comparison wi,,-;.:, available trip tables; select link analysis for testing the contributions to link demands, and test- ing senzitivity of the model to network linkadditions, deletions, changes in link capacities, or changes in land use intensity. Validation of the model chain will be conducted, where possible, on each separate component of the model as well as or the model as a whole. Consultant shall prepare a brief validation plan prior to conducting the evaluation itself and shall brieLl..y report the validation results in the interim documentation (see the subsequent subtask) and more fully in the fin&! documentation (Task 7) . Subtask 3.5 prepare 3nterip Documentation`of the Modc't Chain Once model development, cali'ai ation,, and validation are com-- plete, Consultant shall prepare a brief but concise summary of the model which will document the essentials of the model prior to the publication of the final documentation report. The interim docu- mentation will list the model equations, identify the required model inputs, briefly summarize how the model was validated, and indicate by means of an informal flaw chart how different trip pur- poses are handled in the model . TASK 4: GENERATE BASE YEAR TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS The product resul'Ung from this -task will be selected tables of base year tripmaking characteristics based on outputs of the •transportation demand model. Tabular data will, include interzonal trip interchanges by trip purpose an, trip frequency distributions by trip type. TASK 5: ASSESS FUTURE TRANSPORTATION DEMAND The applic�rr ion of the validated transportation demand model to a City--selected futul4e land use scenario is accomplished in this project flask. Four separate subtasks are identified; the first two assemble the necessaiy land use data and prepare the re- lated transportation networks; the third applies the model; and the fourth covers _the interpretation and; dhe-.king of model results which may be offered as evidence of capital improvement needs Subtask 5.1 Allocate Future Land Use to Zonal System Thies subtask vA1 follow the same procedure as in Subtask 3.2 for the existing land ur3e condition. The objective of Subtask 5.1 .s the proclu0tion of a set of coded land use data by zone in com- puter read.-,ble fn:,r corresponding to the set of future land use and development assumptions specified by City staff. This may be built incrementally from the existing land use data or may be deter- mined independently, ,according 'to the particulars of the selected scenario. ' r Subtask 5.2 - Develop, Code Future Transportation networks This subtask will include the process of specifying future transportation networks) (as selected by City staff' and coding and editing the networks fir anlaysis using the UTPS software em- ployed in Subtask 2.3. The network coding process will be essen- tially Para.:_1 ' to the base network coding and editing process conducted in Subta.A 2.3. Products resulting from this subtask will be a highway and (if appropriate) a transit- network in link file format, compatible with the UTPS software. Subtask 5.3 - Test Circulation Demands Using the Transporta- tion Model The future transportation/development scenario will be tested using the modelling methodology and processing procedures developed in Task 3. Testing of the scenario will involve trip generation and distribution, mode spl.-Lt, aad network assignment. This nat work test is intended to provide much of the information on circu- lation system needs for the City's capital improvement planning, and, as suol- he principal model .,, plication to be undertaken in this project. Subtask 5.4 Assist with Interpretation of Model Results The output from Subtask 5.3 will include trips by mode; pur- pose, and zone; trip talbes trip summaries; link volumes on the highway (and transit networks; vehicle travel' summaries; and (if applicable) transit ridership summaries by route and mode. In Su'otask 5. 4, Consultant will work with City st-_ff t/ draw reasonable observations from the model results obtained. This is envisioned as a cooperative effort directed specifically toward establishing confidence levels for the model results obtained anii verifying and crass-checkiyg the nzmer;ical measures likely to be significant_input to the City' s capital facilities planning effort. The produce resulting from this subtask will be a technical memo- randum prepared by Consultant, outlining the model results mutually deemed to be significant for that planning- program. TASK 6: GENERATE FUTURE YEAR TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS The intent of this task is to generate and assemble selected tables of future year travel characteristics based on outputs of the transportation demand model. The product will be tabular data including interzonal trip interchanges by trip purpose and trip frequency distributions by trip type. ax TASK_7: PREPARE FINAL DOCUMENTATION This narrative document will address the needs of City staff for documentation of transportation models 4ntended for their use. This task comprises the preparation, illustration, and pro- duction of the final documentation report, which, in its final form, will constitute the "Final Report" for the project, as called for; in the r.greement. The final model documentation will. be a single volume hard copy report, the contents of which will 'include, to the extent con- sidered appropriate, the following: . an introduction summarizing the modelling project basic rationale for model, selection documentation for software used (other than standard program package software) in model development and application, including program listings documentation of the functional model chain, including names of the programs used, flow charts of the final computer package, sample input setups,, sample outputs (the last two drawn from model runs made as a part of previous project tasks) control statements (if applicable) for accessing the program package through the computer facility on which it rur . annotated references to UMTA-provided UTPS documentation a flow diagram illustrating how the trip table: is split and handled through all phases of the model process • a listing of all major assumptions behind the model projections • summary sections on model calibration, model validation, and model application • sample problem(s) ' worked through the model chain from start to finish (drawing on model runs made earlier in the project) . a user' s manual, which will be used in the Task 8 training program as well as being incorporated into the Final Report • a surimary of 8:-)urces for land use/transportation input data. A draft of the final documentation report shall be provided to the City for review prior to preparation of final graphics and final production of the report. Said draft shall constitute the project' s Draft Final Report. Following review by City staff, com- ments will be considered and -incorporated as appropriate in the Final Report. TASK 8: PROVIDE TRAINING PROGRAM Near the conclusion of the project, and once a user's manual has been readied, Consultant will conduct a training program on site at the City. The training program will be oriented around a user manual which will contain, or reference, pertinent documenta- tion of interest to current or potential users of the program package. The training program will be conducted in a seminar type format using visual aids according to need. The purpose of the training program is to provide City staff with the familiarity necessary to be capably of _executing model runs essentially unassisted. The user's manual will explain the range of ways in which the model chain can be employed, and will (1) indicate where and how pro,- gram assumptions can be altered: - (2) indicate where and how input and output formats can be modified; (3) describe the means to input alternative land use scenarios (with examples) and (4) de scribe ways of changing highway or transit network links or link capacities TASK 9: INVEST'IGATE MODEL PACKAGE IMPLEMENTATION ON BURROUGHS 2771 This task is exclusive1v concerned with defining in specific terms the scope of effort required to effect implementation of the UTPS-based transportation d=uaand model on the City's Burroughs 2771 computer system. The scope of this task is specifically limited by mutual agreement between City and Consultant, and the actual imple- mentation, if deemed feasible and if ultimately desired by the City, would not be apart of this Scope of Work, but could be per- formed under a separate agreement or, if applicable, as extra work under the terms of this Agreement. Task 9 will result in a brief letter-style report frog Con- sultant to City which, within the time allotted to this task, will provide Consultant's List judgm--nt, based of investigations con- ducted at the CcnsultantIs discretion underthis task, and present findings related to the software conversion steps necessary to implement major UTPS program components on the Burroughs 2771, as configured by the City the best estimate of the dollar cost and the nature of the technical expertise necessary to effect such conversions, if any prominent institutional restrictions on such conversions, if any recommendation of the Consultant team as to the options open to the City considering the advantages to the City staff users of full or partial conversion, and considering realities of cost, timing of conversion efforts elsewhere, and other factors as pertinent. Such recommendations will be based on the technical capability' and services available through the Consultant team, and specifically the. Subcontractor, EDP Management, Inc. EXHIBIT B HUNTINGTON BEACH TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MODEL PROJECT PROJECT COSTS BY TASK Approximate Estimated Task Person-Days Cost 1. Refine Modelling Program Approach 13 $ 3,250 2. Establish Modelling Framework 28 6,000 3. Design Modelling Methodology 72 17,200 4. Generate Base Year Travel Characterasties 5 875 S. Assess Future Transportation Demand 24 4,200 6. Generate Future Year Travel Characteristics if 800 7. Prepare Final Documentation 7-2 4,400 P g. provide Training Program 9 2,250 9. Investigate Model Package Implementation on Burroughs 2771 7 1,960 TOTALS 184 $40,935 vow Return original and three eoples of 1 completed certificatote: CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE City of Huntington Beach TO Dept. CITY OP HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALi;7URNIA P.O,Box'19U Huntington Beath,California 92€49 A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION This is to certify that the policies of insurance as described below have been issued to the insured by the under signed and are.in force at this time.If these policies are cancelled cr changed ir-.such a manner that will affect this certificate,the insurance company agrees to give 30 days prier written no'ice,by mail,to City tr Huntington Beach,P.O.Box 190,Huntington Beach,California 9264a. Name of Insured PROD.T,u�b ;address of Insured 165 POST S F .m. SAN > SCO. (AT.T,FQPMTA - -- Location of Iniuried Opgralions Huntington Beach Transportation Demand Model Profess .oval Consult ag servxces pursuant; to Agreement , Description of Operations 12etween CITY OF 'H MU!JNfyM-N RFACH,;_ CAT.TPr)�,M rl PBQ&D, INC. "CONSULTANT" POLICIES IN FORCE POLICY 0 TV' LIMITS OF(.IklBlLfY!? NUMBER EFFtCTIVE EXPIRATION•" A. Workers Compensation WC Statutory, Employers'Liability $ SLtn :nnn A awn 4235907 1/1/78 1/1/79 � -,, —•-ate' �--- — _ RYA--B. Public Liability: j r$1,000,000 combined single Eodily_Injury: limit pdr occurrence. CCp Manufacturers and Contractors °45207 J i 1/78 1/1/73 $ 5001000 Each Person mprehensive General Q $ 500'000 Each Accident (Including products completed operations) Property Damage $ 3001000 Each Accident C. Automobile Liability: CCp Bodily Injury 3945212 1/1/78 1/1/79 $ non .Each Person $1.000,*000 Each Accident Property Damage $ 300A000 Each Accident Does policy cover: All owned automobiles I V)Yes ( )No Non-owned automobiles (V)Yes ( )No Hired automobiles (i/ )Yea' 1' )No D. Additional Insured Endorsement: The insurer agrees that the City of Huntington Beach City Council,and/or all City Council appointed groups,committees, commissions, boards and any other City Council appointed body, and/or elective end appointive officers, servants or ompio,ens of the City of Huntington Beach,when acting as such are additional assureds hereunderr as respects marisincr out of sere'c tgtle '�]p Zl�ove m(nti oneri�a4*rPaniPnt E. Hold Hornless Agreement: Dy Insured; PB(RssD. T�'�� rPfr-rrar3 tc as "CONSULTANT." The insuVe4AWPvWP1Y' r�tUeTct,defend,indemnify and save harmless the City of Huntington Beach 'l�Q,M age or expense by reason of any suits,claims,demands,j, dgements and causes of action caul d b��.�lin ad ill employees,agents or1W siabcontractooiising out of or in consequence of the performance of all qr any/ 7`3f� red by the certificate of insurance,and such insurance shall be primary to any insurance of the cityr F. Minimum Limits Required: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Combined Single Limit Bodily Injury and/ot Property Damage including Products Liability: � combined single limit per occurrence, City Attorney G. Remarks: By.1 ✓"� Deputy City Attorney Date A,� „_ a,, Ism _. REl?J3.ESENTATIME/BROKER INSURANCE COMPANY CNA/insurance BY Name Ahigndtur of Authqr((x�a! Roprgsentative/Agent exan°der & HiexanCter Address , 40-._.Broad Street Address 60 State Street, Boston. Mass. City Boston. Mass. 02109 Telephone 617-723-9100 a CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE FIRST STATE ! UR PACE COMPANY # 43 AN OPEN CIRCLE COMPANY This is to certify that the insurance policy specified below has been issued to the insured named herein and that,sub- ject to their provisions,exclusions and conditions;, such policies afford the coverages indicated insofar as such coverages apply to-ihe occupation or business of the Named Insured as stated: INSURED: PBQ&D,_Inc. ADDRESS; ITR ET. SAtJ FRANCTSCO CALIFQRNIA__..+.r_ BUSINESS- Genettltapre COVERAGE:._ Umbrella Excess Third Party Liability Yncsurance Policy Number Effective Dare Expiration Date Limit of Liability 9095 1/11 7s /1/79 $3,,000,000 F-k-,LESS OF COVERAGE UNDERLYING LIMITS A. Bodily iWury $ 500,000 . Each Parson Automobile $- h 99Et r099 Each Accident or Occurrence ,c B. Bodily injury $ Each Person _ ro Except Automobile $ 5n Each Accident or Occurrence Q $ Aggregate Products C. Property Damage $ q Autoomobile Each Accident or Occurrence 0 o •r�'1 N r-I D. Property Damage $ inn f,nnn Each Accident or Occurrence ' b Except Automobile $ 300,000 Aggregate Operations H $ 300,000 Aggregate Protective $_ 300,000 Aggregate Products U $ 300,000 Aggregate Contractual a a E, Cambined Single Limit Bodily Injun, Each Accident or Occurrence and/or Property $ N/A Damage F. Employers Liability,$ Coverage„B„ OR EXCESS OF $� 10,000 ,ultimate net loss In respect sr'each occt,,rrance not covered by underlying but applicable to umbrella liability only. This Certificate of insurance is Issuod as a matter of Information onlyto; NAME. army QE 14TINmrnrr,.�,nN nFArtt ADDRESS: P.O. Box 190 _HI NTTN ON_nr. Q1, CA 92648 .:Date at this---9-^.Day of ee.L-19 78 I i> lC-/ C•216 Authorized Signature '�OR CITY COUNCIL ,, I ION REQUEM Submitted by Edward D. Selich Department Planning Date.Prepared July 10, , 29 78 Backup Material Attached E Yes No Subject Consultant selection for development of computerized trans- Po tation demand model. City Administrator's Comments Approve as recommended , ? Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE Staff has reviewed the proposals submitted for the development of a computerized transportation demand model as previously authorized by the City Council. This projeot will provide input to the Circulation Element c1 the General Plan and will greatly assist in the development of the City's Capital Improvement Program. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the selection of PBQ & D, !rxc. to develop the transportation. demand model or the City for a maximum fee of $40,935 and authorize the execution of a professional services agreement. ANALYSIS At its March 20, 1978 meeting, the City Council authorized staff to solicit proposals from consultants for the Cavelopment of a computer ized transportation demand model which will enable City staff to d analyze the impacts of different land use alternatives on the circu- lation system. The project will provide much-needed input during the preparation of the Capital Improvement Program, The five firms which responded to the Fequest for Proposal are listed below, together with the estimated total cost. Estimated t•:aximam Cost PBQ & D, Inc./EDP Management, Inc. $40,935 2. COM,SIS Corp./Mohle, Perry & Assoc. $38,800 3. JHK & Associates $45,`000 4, Herman Kimmel & Assoc./ $40,000 t Herman Basmaciyan & Assoc-. 5. Alan M. Voorhees & Assoc. $39,800 Pf0 3/7s Page Two The five proposals were reviewed in detail by City Staff (including representatives from Planning, Public Works, and Data Processing) , and each of the respondents were interviewed. The selection p, ocess was based on the demonstrated qualifications and expertise of the project staff and the firm itself, the details of the proposed work program, and the reasonableness of the cost schedule, Based on these factors, it is recommended that PBQ &, D, Inc. be given the responsibility for this project. FUNDING SOURCE: The funding source for this project will be the City's Gas TaxFund (a current status report of the fund is attached) This project is included in the projects planned for FY 78-79 under "Miscellaneous Traffic =end Operational Improvements," but is not listed separately. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1,. Select another consultant to perform the work, 2. Hire additional City staff to undertake the project without consultant assistance. 3. Postpone or cancel the study. Each of these alternatives would involve delays which ?night jeopardize the time schedule for the Capital Improvement Program, Respectfully submitted, Edward D. Seli.ch Director EDS:BD:ge Attachments: 1. Status Report of Gas Tax Fund 2. Proposed Agreement and Statement of Work l i STATUS REPORT OF GAS TAX FUND as of June 1978 j Unencumbered Gas Tax Fund Balance $3,100,000 Anticipated revenue for 1978-79 FY 870, 000 Interest on investment 160,000 Available for Projects $4 ,130,000 Gas Tax Funded Portion of Projects Plan..ed for 78-79 FY 1. Yorktown Street widening Main to Beach $ 416,000 2. Talbert Street widening - Gothard to Newland 213,000 3. McFadden Street widening Gothard to San Diego Freeway 50,000 4. Saybrook Street improvement - Edinger to Santa Barbara 151,000 5. 'Springdale street widening - Bo•lsa to Glennwood 250,000 6. Frankfort reconstructior) & cul-de-sac restruction 82,000 7. Yorktown street widening 300' E/o to 500 ' E/o' Beach 150,000" 8. Newland sidewalk construction - Yorktown to ' Bridgeport 11,000 9. Trudy Woodstock Storm Drain 300, 000 10,. Michael Drive Storm Drain 175, 000 11. Old Town Storm Drain Phase III 380,000 12. Rogers, Herbert, 'Kern Storm Drain 50 ,000 13. Keniworth Storm Drain 50,000 14 Street Maintenance 500_,000 15. Edinger Avenue Traffic Signal Interconnect 105,000 16. Construct Traffic Signals at 4 locations 212,000 17. Miscellaneous Traffic and Operational Improvements 300,000 Subtotal $3, 395,000 Balance in Gas Tax Fund after 78-79 FY Projects ' $ 735,000 Anticipated Revenue for 1979-80 FY 900,000 Interest on Investment 120,000 Available for 1979-80 FY Projects $1,755, 000 Gas Tax Funded Portion of Projects Planned for 7`9-80 FY 1. Edinger Avenue Street Widening Bolsa Chica West City Limit $ 383,500 2. Ellis Avenue Railroad Underpass 262,000 3. Brookliurst Street Widening Hamilton to PCH 515,000 4. Slater Avenue Street Widening Gothard to Newland 250,000 5. Pacific Coast Highway Widening (FAU) 50,000 6. Construct Traffic Signals @-6 Locations 218,000 t Subtotal $1,678,500 Status Report of Gas Tax Fund Page 2 , Balance in Gas Tax Fund after 79-80 7Y Projects $ 76,500 Anticipated Revenue for 1980-8'1 FY 920,000 Interest on Investments 50,000 Available for 80-81. FY Projects $1,046,500 Gas Tax Funded Portion of Porjects Planned for the 80-81 FY 1. Main Gothard Connection $ 400,000 2. 'Main Lake Connection Phase_ I 200,000 3. Warner Street Widening Adjacent to Meadowlark Airport & Sea 'Aira Trailer Park 85, 000 4 Miscellaneous Traffic Operational Improvements 112,000 Subtotal . $ 797, 000 Balance in Gas Tax Fund after 1980-81 Projects $ 249,500 ,r GAS TAX FUND i Revenue 1402 Interest Income $ 16o,000 1403 State Tax - 2107 755,000 1404 State Tax 2107.5 10,000` 1405 State Tax 2106 870,000 Federal Government (FAU) 515,500 County of Orange (AHFP) 909,500 City of Westminster 16,200 General Fund 9,700 Developers 8,000 Total $ 3,253,900 Expenditures Transfer to General Fund $ 755,000 Yorktown Street Widening Main to Beach 742,000 Talbert Street Widening"- Gothard to Newland 426,000 + McFadden Street Widening Gothard to San Diego Frwy 139,000 Saybrook St. Improvements - Edinger to Santa Barbara 302,500 Springdale St. Widening Bolsa to Glenwood 380,300 Frankfort Reconstruction 82,000 Yorktown St. Widening 300' E/O to 500' E/O Beach 150,000 Newland Sidewalk Construction 11 ,000 Trudy Woodstock Storm Drain 300,000 Michal Drive Storm Drain 175,000 Old Twon Storm Drain Pahse 111 380,000 Rogers, Herbert, Kern Storm Drain 50,000 Kenilworth, Vineland Storm Drain 50,000 Street Maintenance ProgramProgram 506,000 Edinger Ave. Traffic Signal Interconnect 620,500 Construct 4 traffic signals 212,000 Misc. Traffic and Operational improvements 333,900 Total $ 5,608,900 Deficit to be funded from $3,094,065 in unappropriated fund balance $ 2,355,000 Recap Revenue $3,253,900 Unappropriated Fund Balance 2,355,000 Total $ 5,608,900 Expenditures $ 5,608,900 JA City of Huntington Beach P'O. Box ISO CALIFORNIA 92649 OFFICE OF TfIE CITY CLERIC 1 1 , August 18 1978 g P.Q.Q.. & D. 2323 N. Broadway, Suite }50 Santa Ana, California 9r108 Attn: Mike Schneider Dear Sir: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held July 17, 1978, approved an agreement between the City and your company t0 develop the transportation demand' model for the City for a maximum fee of $40,935. Enclosed is a copy of the executed agreement and a copy of the insurance. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AhW:bt Enclosures CC: Finance Department PBQ R D, Inc., A New Jersey Corporation, 165 Post Street, San Francisco