HomeMy WebLinkAboutRICHARD BRADY & ASSOCIATES - 2001-06-18 a r
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
LETTER OF TRANS.N-IITTAL OF ITEM APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL/
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTItiGTOti BEACH
DATE: June 22, 2001
TO: Richard Brady & Associates ATTEITTION: Richard D. Brady, Pres.
Name
4909 Murphy Canyon Rd. , Suite 220 DEPARTMENT:
Street _
San Diego, CA 92123 REGARDING: Professional Services
City,State,Zip
Contract - CC-1104
See Attached Action Agenda Item E-6 Date of Approval 6/18/01
Enclosed For Your Records is An Executed Cope Of The Above Referenced Agenda Item.
Remarks:
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
Attachments: Action Agenda Page x Agreement x Bonds Insurance s
RCA Deed Other
CC: R. Beardsley DPW x x x
Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance other
D. DeBow DPW x x x
name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other
Name Department RCA Ag:eemert Insurance Other
Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other
C. Mendoza Risk Mgmt. x x
Narrie Department RCA Insurance
(Telephone:714-53"227)
%ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEA D- mow, DrW
MEETING DATE: June 18, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBS :PW 01-080
Council/Agency Meeting Held: Ob- -41
Deferred/Continued to: r
pproved J Conditionally Approved Denied A �-_ Cl! Signature r
&until Meeting Date: June 18, 2001 Department ID Number: PW 01-080
N �
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR ACTION
co
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
x
SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 6FAd
PREPARED BY: ROBERT F. BEARDSLEY, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WOR
SUBJECT: APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FO
OVERMYER RESERVOIRS REHABILITATION ENGINEERING DESIGN,
CC-1104
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue: Rehabilitation of the Overmyer Reservoirs is an approved Water
Master Plan Project. A professional civil engineering consultant is required to design the
project.
Funding Source: Funds in the amount of$1,000,000 are budgeted in the Water Master
Plan Fund, Overmyer Reservoir, Account No. 50791007.82100.
Recommended Action: Motion to:
1. Approve the attached Professionals Services Contract with Richard Brady and Associates
(RBA) for detailed engineering design services for the Overmyer Reservoirs
Rehabilitation; and
2. Authorize the Director of Public Works to expend up to $767,000 to cover contract costs
of$592,658 an estimated contingency of$115,000 and supplemental expenditures of
$59,342.
Alternative Action(s):
1. Deny approval of the contract and direct staff accordingly. This action will delay needed
repairs for this critical reservoir facility, and compromise reserve storage capacity.
01-080 June 18 DeBow (Overmyer Reservoir Design) -3- 618101 11:33 AM G
,5,
• REQUEST FOR ACTION•
MEETING DATE: June 18, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:PW 01-080
Analysis:
The City of Huntington Beach owns and operates Overmyer Reservoirs No. 1, 2, and 3.
They are located at the southwest corner of Garfield Avenue and Huntington Street, within
the Public Works Water Division Yard. (Attachment 1). Overmyer Nos. 1 and 2 have a
combined capacity of 2.7 million gallons (MG). Overmyer No. 3 has a capacity of 21.5 MG.
These reservoirs provide critical operating and reserve storage of potable water for the City.
Overrmyer No. 1 and 2 were built in 1960 and 1963 respectively. Overmyer No. 3 and the
associated booster pumping station were constructed in 1971.
In July 1999, the City contracted with Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers (CGvL) to
develop rehabilitation alternatives for the Overmyer Reservoirs facility. In May 2000, CGvL
completed the Overmyer Reservoirs and Booster Pumping Station Rehabilitation Alternatives
Study. In summary, the recommended improvements include rebuilding and re-equipping
the Overmyer Booster Pumping Station, and replacing the roofs on Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2.
Additionally, the study recommends rebuilding Reservoir No. 3 roof and columns, and
repairing the reinforced concrete walls and floor. The recommendation was to rehabilitate
the Reservoir No. 3 structure, rather than to demolish and reconstruct it. The rehabilitation
approach is estimated to save the City in excess of$11 million dollars.
On March 19, 2001, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was sent to the following engineering
consultants:
1. R. W. Beck 5. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan (PBS&J)
2. Carollo Engineers 6. S.A. Associates
3. CH2MHill 7. Richard Brady and Associates (RBA)
4. Cathcart Garcia von Langen Engineers
Although five of the above firms indicated strong interest in the project prior to issuance of
the RFP, proposals were only received from CGvL and RBA. A three-member team
evaluated each proposal within the parameters of a fixed rating system identified in the RFP.
Each proposal team was brought in for a personal interview, and extensive reference checks
were completed. Both teams were fully capable of performing the work. In the final
analysis, it was determined that RBA was the better choice. RBA offered an innovative
approach to the project, and they have extensive experience in very similar projects.
The sealed fee proposals, opened after the qualifications analysis, were within 4% of one
another. Staff accepts and recommends the RBA proposal in the amount of$592,658 as a
comprehensive proposal and reasonable fee. This process is consistent with the City's
policy of Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) for professional services.
01-080 June 18 DeBow (Overmyer Reservoir Design) -4- 6I8101 1:52 PM
• REQUEST FOR ACTION
MEETING DATE: June 18, 2001 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:PW 01-080
Because the nature of the project, including the potential for excessive deterioration of the
reservoir structure, staff is requesting that 20 percent be reserved to cover change orders
instead of the normal ten percent limit. This request is in accordance with Resolution No.
4896.
Although the Director has authorization to expend the maximum amount approved for the
project, the contract is based on an hourly rate with a not-to-exceed limit. Hour and cost
estimates have been provided for each task, and submitted invoices are verified against the
proposal. Additional work, or change orders, are reviewed and authorized by the project
manager. Examples of change orders for reservoir design would be changes of scope
resulting from geotechnical unknowns or extraordinary deterioration.
The project manager and purchasing manager authorize supplemental expenses. Typically,
these are specialized tasks that cannot be performed by the design engineer. Examples
include geotechnical studies, concrete testing or ultrasonic testing. Costs may be negotiated
on per task or on a time and materials basis, depending upon the type of work.
Public Works Commission Review: Not required at this time, per Municipal Code Chapter
2.111.
Environmental Status: Not applicable at this time. Environmental entitlement will be
provided by RBA pursuant to the scope of services.
A_ttach_ment(s):
ity Clerk's
age Number 0. escription
1. Vicinity Map
2. Professional Services Contract with Richard Brady and Associates
RCA Author: Debbie De Bow.jm, Ext. 5528
G:ENGIDE130W\?RCA01-080
01-080 Jane 18 DeBow (Overmyer Reservoir Design) - 618101 3:42 PM
ATTACHMENT # 1
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
OVERMYER RESERVOIR REHABILITATION
VICINITY MAP
z
0 LIJ
PROPOSED z
PROJECT SITE z
+:
c�jl� �j��ll�l �� ��1 �J i
Li
GARFIELD
J
ETTI
F-4-
C LAY
r TT
-------------
rL-1
Mid.
'F 4
:r
ATTACHMENT #2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF HU: TINGTON BEACH AND
RICHARD BRADY AND ASSOCIATES
FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
FOR THE OVERMYER RESERVOIR REHABILITATION
Table of Contents
1 Work Statement ........................................................................................................1.
2 City Staff Assistance.................................................................................................2
3 Time of Performance ................................................................................................2
4 Compensation .............................................................. ..........................................2
5 Priorities....................................................................................................................2
6 Extra Work................................................................................................................2
7 Method of Payment...................................................................................................3
8 Disposition of Plans, Estimates and Other Documents ............................................4
9 Hold Harmless ..........................................................................................................5
10 Workers' Compensation...........................................................................................5
11 Professional Liability Insurance.................... ...5
........................................................
12 General Liability Insurance ......................................................................................6
13 Certificates of Insurance ..........................................................................................7
14 Independent Contractor............................................................................................8
15 Termination of Agreement.......................................................................................8
16 Assignment and Subcontracting...............................................................................8
17 Copyrights/Patents...................................................................................................8
18 City Employees and Officials ..................................................................................8
19 Notices ....................................................................... .......9
.......................................
20 Immigration..............................................................................................................9
21 Section Headings.............................................................................9
22 Interpretation of this Agreement............................................................10
23 Duplicate Original...........................................................................10
24 Legal Services Subcontracting Prohibited............:..................................................10
25 Attorney Fees....................................................................................:......................11
26 Entirety................................................................. ..................... ...II
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND
RICHARD BRADY AND ASSOCIATES
FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
FOR THE OVERMYER RESERVOIR REHABILITATION
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 18th day of ,Tune , 2001,
by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California,
hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and RICHARD BRADY AND ASSOCIATES, a California
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT."
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant for engineering design
services for the Overmyer Reservoir rehabilitation in the City of Huntington Beach; and
Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of
HBMC Chapter 3.03 relating to procurement of professional service contracts has been complied
with; and
CONSULTANT has been selected to perform said services,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows:
1. WORK STATEMENT
CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in the CONSULTANT's
proposal dated April 20, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A"), which is attached hereto
and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Said services shall sometimes
hereinafter be referred to as "PROJECT."
CONSULTANT hereby designates Richard D. Brady, who shall represent it and be its
sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement.
2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE
CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the
performance of this Agreement.
0l agree Brady.G Gr0 1 1
•
3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of the CONSULTANT
are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement and all tasks
specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than eight (8) years from the date of this
Agreement. These times may be extended with the written permission of the CITY. The time
for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be shown in the Scope of
Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This schedule may be amended to benefit the
PROJECT if mutually agreed by the CITY and CONSULTANT.
4. COMPENSATION
In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees
to pay CONSULTANT a fee not to exceed Five Hundred Ninety Two Thousand Six Hundred
Fifty Eight Hundred Dollars ($592,658.00).
5. PRIORITIES
In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this
AGREEMENT, the CITY's RFP, or the CONSULTANT's Proposal,the following order of
precedence shall govern: 1) AGREEMENT, 2) the CONSULTANT's Proposal, and 3) the
CITY's RFP.
6. EXTRA WORK
In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A," or
changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSULTANT will undertake such
work after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra
work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained.
O l agree;Grady:G 6 O l 2
• i
7. METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to progress payments toward the fixed
fee set forth herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedules set forth in
Exhibit "A".
B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every technical memo and report
prepared by CONSULTANT shall be submitted to the CITY to demonstrate progress toward
completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY
shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any such product which has not
been formally accepted or rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted.
C. The CONSULTANT shall submit to the CITY an invoice for each
progress payment due. Such invoice shall:
1) Reference this Agreement;
2) Describe the services performed;
3) Show the total amount of the payment due;
4) Include a certification by a principal member of the
CONSULTANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the
provisions of this Agreement; and
5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work
completed, or a task-by-task basis.
Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that
CONSULTANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with
this Agreement, CITY shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made
within thirty(30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld. If the CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify
01 agree--bi ady.G:`G o 1 3
•
CONSULTANT in writing of the reasons for non-approval, within seven (7) calendar days of
receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be
suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULTANT is in, or has been
brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated as provided herein.
D. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by CITY
shall be invoiced separately to the CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information
required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such
time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the
extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours
worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any
dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate
and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement.
S. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
CONSULTANT agrees that all materials prepared hereunder, including all
original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, maps and other
documents, shall be turned over to CITY upon termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT
completion, whichever shall occur first. In the event this Agreement is terminated, said materials
may be used by CITY in the completion of PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit. Title to said
materials shall pass to the CITY upon payment of fees determined to be earned by
CONSULTANT to the point of termination or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is
applicable. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to retain-copies of all data prepared hereunder.
9. HOLD HARMLESS
CONSULTANT shall protect, defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless CITY,
its officers, officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, damage,
D 1 agree:hradp:Yr GiU] 4
i •
expenses, costs (including without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature) arising
out of or in connection with CONSULTANT's performance of this Agreement or its failure to
comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement by CONSULTANT, its officers,
agents or employees except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or
willful misconduct of CITY. CITY shall be reimbursed by CONSULTANT for all costs and
attorney's fees incurred by CITY in enforcing this obligation.
10. WORKERS COMPENSATION
CONSULTANT shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers'
Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of
Division 4 and 5 of the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar state
or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY from and
against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature
and description, including attorneys' fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against
CITY, for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason
of any work to be performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement.
11. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
CONSULTANT shall furnish a professional liability insurance policy covering
the work performed by it hereunder. Said policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT'S
professional liability in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate.
A claims made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that:
1. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the professional services
contractor's start of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or
replacements).
01 agree.."brad v:'6,'6:01 5
2. CONSULTANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the
required extended period of coverage following project completion, including the
requirement of adding all additional insureds.
3. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULTANT agrees to purchase an
extended reporting provision of at least two (2) years to report claims arising from
work performed in connection with this Agreement.
4. The reporting of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims.
Under no circumstances shall this insurance contain a self-insured retention, or a
"deductible"or any other similar form of limitation on the required coverage in
excess of$50,000.00. The Settlement Committee approved this amount on April
20, 1999.
12. GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
In addition to the workers' compensation insurance and CONSULTANT's
covenant to indemnify CITY, CONSULTANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY, a policy of
general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage covering the PROJECT.
Said policy shall indemnify CONSULTANT, its officers, agents and employees, while acting
within the scope of their duties, against any and all claims arising out of or in connection with
the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not less than the following amount: combined
single limit bodily injury and property damage, including products/completed operations liability
and blanket contractual liability, of$1,000,000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a
form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less
than $1,000,000 for this PROJECT. Said policy shall name CITY, its agents, its officers,
employees and volunteers as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other
01 agree/brad p16.6M 1 6
insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage
and that CONSULTAl`T's insurance shall be primary.
Under no circumstances shall the above-mentioned insurance contain a self-
insured retention, or a "deductible" or any other similar form of limitation on the required
coverage.
13. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE
Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULTANT shall
furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the
foregoing insurance coverages as required by this Agreement; said certificates shall:
a. Provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy;
b. shall state that the policy is currently in force; and
C. shall promise to provide that such policies shall not be suspended, voided
or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty days prior written
notice; however, ten days prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of
premium.
CONSULTANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverages in force until
the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY.
The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverages shall not derogate
_ from the provisions for indemnification of CITY by CONSULTANT under the Agreement.
CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of all
said policies of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the
premiums on all insurance hereinabove required.
01 agrecibbrady:6 6 01 7
14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this
Agreement as an independent contractor. CONSULTANT shall secure at its expense, and be
responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance
compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT
and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the
services to be performed hereunder.
15. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike
manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder at any time with or without
cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete. CONSULTANT may terminate this
Agreement upon thirty(30) days prior notice to CITY. Any termination of this Agreement by
CITY or CONSULTANT shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CITY or
CONSULTANT as provided herein.
16. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder
shall not be delegated by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the consent of
CITY.
17. COPYRIGHTSIPATENTS
CONSULTANT shall retain all rights to any patent or copyright on any work,
item or material owned by CONSULTANT and used in the performance of this Agreement.
18. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS
CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee
in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have
0l agree brady:'G!6/01 8
any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California
Government Code.
19. NOTICES
Any notice or special instructions required to be given in writing under this
Agreement shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated
in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY's Director of Public Works as the situation shall warrant, or
by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the
United States Postal Service, addressed as follows:
TO CITY: TO CONSULTANT:
City of Huntington Beach Richard D. Brady, President
Director of Public Works Richard Brady& Associates
2000 Main Street 4909 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 220
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 San Diego, CA 92123
20. IMMIGRATION
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration
and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions
of the Lnited States Corte regarding employment verification.
21. SECTION HEADINGS
The titles, captions, section, paragraph, subject headings and descriptive phrases
at the beginning of the various sections in this Agreement are merely descriptive and are
included solely for convenience of reference only and are not representative of maters included
or excluded from such provisions, and do not interpret, define, limit or describe, or construe the
intent of the parties or affect the construction or interpretation of any provision of this
Agreement.
01 agree/brady/6.16/01 9
22. NTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT
The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a
whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties. If any
provision of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or court of competent jurisdiction to be
unenforceable, void, illegal or invalid, such holding shall not invalidate or affect the remaining
covenants and provisions of this Agreement. No covenant or provision shall be deemed
dependent upon any other unless so expressly provided here. As used in this Agreement, the
masculine or neuter gender and singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the other
whenever the context so indicates or requires. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as
to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between
any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation
contrary to which the parties have no right to contract, then the latter shall prevail, and the
provision of this Agreement which is hereby affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the
extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law.
23. DUPLICATE ORIGINAL
The original of this Agreement and one or more copies hereto have been prepared
and signed in counterparts as duplicate originals, each of which so executed shall, irrespective of
the date of its execution and delivery, be deemed an original. Each of the parties hereto shall
retain an originally signed copy hereof. Each duplicate original shall be deemed an original
instrument as against any party who has signed it.
24. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED
CONSULTANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any
subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside
the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSULTANT understands that pursuant to
01agrec!rrady/6I6!01 10
• i
Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for
CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by
CONSULTANT.
25. ATTORNEY'S FEES
In the event suit is brought by either party to enforce the terms and provisions of
this agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees.
26. ENTIRETY
The foregoing, and Exhibit "A": attached hereto, set forth the entire Agreement
between the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
by and through their authorized offices the day, month and year first above written.
RICHARD BRADY & ASSOCIATES, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, A
a California corporation municipal corporation of the State of
California
By: k!
Richard Brady, President
Al\TD Mayor
By. ATTEST-
Sandra Brady, as rer `
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: City Clerk 06-22—
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City,Kdministrator
City Attorney
b�� ��
I - T AND APPR�WED:
Director of Public Works
01 agrceibrady 6�6 0] I I
EXHIBIT A
e�//�i��.���e✓.%�r.!!�Ii,...S.,X1._.t_.:_. :l/..�[tI./Iarl�
1
' April 20, 2001
' Ms. Deborah DeBow, P.E.
Associate Civil Engineer
' Engineering Division
Department of Public Works
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
' Subject: Proposal for Engineering Services
Overmyer Reservoirs Rehabilitation Design
Dear Ms. DeBow,
' Thank you for the opportunity to resent our proposal to provide professional engineering
Y PP Y P P P P
' services for the above-referenced project.
The enclosed submittal highlights our experience in performing similar reservoir and pump
' station design services for other municipal clients, and offers an approach and methodology to
address the specific issues and work items identified in the Request for Proposals and other
suggestions that we believe will be beneficial to the City of Huntington Beach.
' We appreciate your consideration of Richard Brady & Associates for this important project. If
you have any questions regarding our submittal, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
1
' tchajrdD. Brady, P.E., DEE
President
' c\wkb.ld B.J a..��.p.,po,.e.;e�,ya e��.e��,�BexhNO—y Rexrwu•R•bab\--Ie"e V0C
49G9✓ll..��y �{/rcat ��.! uile,�,�G • �� ��� ���fckaa .9,�1,P�
' ����/ 4160.�G0 • � �5P/ 99�G5G5
1
Table of Contents
1
' 1. Executive Summary
• References
1
II. Project Approach
1
III. Project Team
' Designated Project Manager/Alternate er/Alternate Project Manager
' g J g � B
' 0 Organizational Chart
' IV. Technical Qualifications
' • 17.1 MG Los Coches Reservoir for Padre Dam MWD
■ 20 MG 520-3 Zone Reservoir for Otay Water District
t • Alvarado Regulating Reservoirs and Pipelines for the City of San Diego
• Existing Earl Thomas Reservoir Evaluation for the City of San Diego
• New 35 MG Earl Thomas Reservoir for the City of San Diego
• 10 MG Sweetwater Reservoir Rehabilitation for Padre Dam MWD
• Del Cerro Highlands Pump Plant for the City of San Diego
' V. Project Schedule
' VI. Statement of Offer& Signature
' Appendices
■ Resumes
■ Insurance Certification
1
P,4,a M,u* d. /w
1
� • i
I. Executive Summary
' Richard Brady & Associates appreciates the opportunity to be considered by the City
of Huntington Beach to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Overmyer
' Reservoirs Rehabilitation Design project. We believe that our proposed Project
Manager, Rick Brady, has both the technical abilities and professional skills
necessary to successfully complete this project on time and within budget.
' Our Proposal demonstrates that:
' ➢ Our firm has unmatched experience in the design, construction, startup,
and operation of drinking water storage and pumping projects. Rick
Brady has served as the design engineer and construction manager on
twelve (12) reservoir nroiect larger than 10 MG in- size in southern
Cali ornia over the past 21 years.
' ➢ We understand the issues, challenges, and operational concerns of water
storage reservoir rehabilitation design. We have performed similar
investigations, evaluations, and designs for numerous projects of similar
' size and complexity.
➢ We know what the most current and recommended "best practices" are
' for meeting local and state guidelines for reservoir design.
➢ We are knowledgeable and familiar with design features that address the
' need to assure and protect water quality.
Our firm is excited about the prospect of working with the City of Huntington Beach
' on this project, if selected, we are prepared to begin work immediately.
References:
Mr. Norm Pierce, City of San Diego
5540 Kiowa Drive
La Mesa, CA 91942-1306
(619)465-7520
' Mr. Karl Kemp (General Manager), Mesa Consolidated Water District
1965 Placentia) Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92628-5008
' (949) 631-206.
Mr. Brian Smith, Vista Irrigation District
' 202 W. Connecticut Avenue
Vista, CA 92083
' (760) 806-3113
1
1 • •
1
II. Project Approach
' Our basic approach assumes the recommendations from the Cathcart Garcia von Langen (CGvL)
Engineers report dated May 2000 will be adhered to as proposed, but these recommendations are
1 -considered.a-niiiiimuml vel-oPimprov�mettt. An our review of the report, we have identified a
kelto-explo number of areas that we would lire further to primarily address improvements related
to constructability/scheduling of the work, maintenance of plant operations (MOPO) during
1 construction of the work, water quality, and Contractor/City staff safety/accessibility. These
_suggestions pertain primarily to the reservoir work. We see the booster pump station assignment
as a fairly straightforward implementation of the predesign report recommendations.
' Constructability/Scheduling of the Work/MOPO
1 A major issue we envision is developing a plan for the Contractor that allows the work to
proceed logically and efficiently, while maintaining sufficient reservoir storage for the City's
operational needs for the entire duration of the construction contract. To facilitate the
1 Contractor's operations (and to lower the overall cost of his/her work) and to ensure the City's
water delivery commitments can be reliably met for the full 18 months of construction activity,
we suggest a dividing wall be considered for the 21.5 MG Reservoir No. 3. A preliminary
1 suggested layout for the dividing wall is illustrated on Figure 1. The dividing wall will split the
current 21.5 MG volume into two separate compartments of approximately 6.5 and 15 MG each.
A new inlet/outiet manifold can also be installed as shown on Figure 2. Together, these two
' improvements will provide several major short and long-term benefits to the City, in addition to
other water quality benefits described under"Water Quality"below. These benefits include;
' 1. By first constructing the dividing wall, the Contractor will be able to stage the work
without having the full reservoir volume out of service for the entire duration of the
work. The work should proceed more smoothly for the Contractor without having the
1 burden to complete the entire construction project before the reservoir can be returned
to service. The potential for a construction delay occurring in work of this nature is
significant. The presence of the dividing wall will eliminate this concern.
1 2. Once the dividing wall is complete, the City will always have a minimum of more
than 9 MG of storage in service at any given time, for the entire construction
duration.
1 3. Long-term, the City will have a compartmentalized reservoir that will allow improved
flexibility for operations and maintenance.
4. A compartmentalized reservoir will provide a additional security from possibly
1 "floating" if either side is taken out of service for extended maintenance. Reservoirs
are typically removed from service during periods of low demands (i.e., winter).
These low demand periods generally fall within the months of heaviest rainfall, which
1 correspond to the highest groundwater conditions. Always having one compartment
full of water will provide additional security from "floating", which is potentially
possible if the entire reservoir were drained as a unit.
' 5. The baffles shown on Figure 1 and discussed below under "Water Quality" will
provide the additional benefit of dampening any surge wave that can occur during an
earthquake.
2
INLET OUTLET
' MANIF10LD, SEE
FIGURE 2
r i
co
1 i
i
' HYPALON CURTAINS
SEE FIGURE 3 92
FLOW PATH
1 I
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Figure
OVERMYER RESERVOIR 1
UNIT N0. 3
' SCALE: _ �G'
i
4 � l
g 1
p4
x
INI�T�a�1-�i�7
5TANL-SIDS 5TOML �LO'N
a
4
� Xng�Ttr�r�-Y trra ,. �.a,�c��
46"P7 (TYP.)
VIA
5CµEpULr= 10 ,1141:S'SS
p 57r--k--L IIPC
O
a
r c = INIwT
� Zm z
-I CO � Z
0CUw
Z
o = COV
r— 30o �aP
p GA7a (TYP) Nor/ fZEh�TZ.�IOIiZ
NEr/CoN�C�E7E vY�- µ P L-S
Ul .
C7
fTI
Z CD
Water Qualify
' Though a single inlet/outlet pipeline does not necessarily mean that a water quality problem
exists, current best design practice and California Department of Health Services preference is to
' provide some means of baffling or flow distribution piping to assure adequate mining and
circulation within a reservoir. For systems using free chlorine for secondary disinfection, a loss
of residual within a reservoir due to poor circulation and/or long residence times (i.e., "age of the
' water"), is a concern as discussed below.
There is no AWWA or industry standard for reservoir design. The closest document that comes
' to providing reservoir design guidance is the California Waterworks Standards. The California
Waterworks Standards do not specifically require separate inlet and outlet pipelines. There is no
authoritative design standard or code that requires separate inlet and outlet pipelines. However,
current industry standards and good design practice would dictate the separation of these
pipelines in any reservoir design, regardless of size, shape, or depth. Each reservoir design is
specific to the storage needs and criteria of the owner, the constraints of the site, the preference
' of building materials (steel vs. concrete), local design codes (seismic), and aesthetic concerns.
Very little in the way of research or design standards has been published in this area. Research
that we have relied up in our recent reservoir projects include-
BISHOP, MARK M. The CT Concept and Modifications to Improve
Detention Times. AWWA 1993 Annual Conference.
CARPENTER, C.H. Constructing and Maintaining Distribution Storage
' Structures. Journal AWWA(November 1982).
DUNN, HOWARD J. et al. A Hydraulic Investigation of Flow Patterns
' and Disinfection Requirements for a Circular Clearwell. AWWA 1991
Annual Conference.
' GRAYMAN, W.M. et al. The Effects of Operation, Design, and Location
of Storage Tanks on the Water Quality in a Distribution System. 1991
AWWARF/USEPA Conference in Distribution Systems, Cincinnati, Ohio.
' KENNEDY, MARK S. et al. Assessing the Effects of Storage Tank
Design on Water Quality. Journal AWWA(July 1993).
' Summarizing key statements from these documents:
' • Flow patterns, even with separate.inlet and outlet pipelines, indicate that considerable
short circuiting occurs in all reservoirs.
' • Bea in or prow&n separate eeds and multi le withdrawals reduces short.circuitin
considerably, and increase retention times,
• Maximizing the jWg action of the inlet and outlet pipelines is desirarble Goad
circulation perliAmance can be achieved by dischgaiLng above the high water level
and withdrawing at the bottom.
1
��,V4 d Jd�foa� 3
1
i
1
• The inlet and outlet arrangement can have a significant effect on circulation.
' • Although some studies have been conducted demonstrating storage reservoirs can affect
water quality, effects on water quality have generally not been addressed in tank design.
' • From the moment water has been disinfected, its age increases and its quality changes as
a result of time-dependent chemical and biochemical reactions. Storage reservoirs can
' contribute to substantial increases in water age depending on factors such as tank
geometry, operation, and location.
' • Residence time is directly affected by the frequency of fill-drain cycles and volumetric
change during each cycle, which in turn is related to the reservoir size relative to system
demand.
' Tank geometry appears to have little or no effect on the overall mixing behavior of a
' g rY Pp g
reservoir. The inlet-outlet location may be more important than geometric shape in
' determining mixing characteristics.
' d Tanks with a common inlet/outlet located at the bottom show mixinz is not occurring,
leading to a behavior characterized as "first in,_last out': The first incremental volume
of water to enter the tank is the last to leave. The oldest water would reside in the upper
' levels.
• Storage reservoirs should be designed to ensure maximum volumetric change.
t • Residence time or turnover rate has a profound effect on the average age of the water that
is leaving a tank.
' Figures 1 and 2 illustrate a proposed scheme to improve water circulation within the reservoir.
Figure 1 shows a baffle layout that should significantly improve the Tlo time (detention time at
' which 90% of the water passing through the reservoir is retained within the reservoir). Figure 2
shows a proposed manifold layout that allows water to enter the reservoir through either inlet,
but when water is withdrawn, the inlet flap gate will close, and all water will enter the booster
pump station through the outlet pipe. In this mode of operation, all water will be forced to travel
from the inlet side to the outlet side of the reservoir. A sample hypalon curtain baffling system is
shown-on Figure 3-
Though the City currently employs free chlorine for secondary disinfection, a future switch to
chloramines is not out of the question. Reservoirs storing large volumes of chloraminated water
' must consider the possibly of nitrification. If nitrification occurs, the total chlorine residual and
ammonia concentration is depleted. Nitrite, nitrate, and heterotrophic plate counts (HPQ are
likely to increase dramatically. Studies have shown that the residence time of water in storage
facilities is the primary factor that affects the extent of nitrification, further justifying the need to
consider the water quality enhancements described herein.
' Safety/Accessibility
Interior and exterior stairs should be considered to improve Contractor and City staff safety. Our
experience has shown that the interior and exterior stairs are invaluable during the construction
�iady c .Sd�s�rRara.�ia 4 WW
1
- 2-C•MAX -on CF ANGLS
-0 3E LE'VE-
`L3/B•O BO-T ASS'Y
---F
AS M.L---ON
' MEMBRANE
FLOOR SLAB
' MEMBRANE SUSP SION ASSEMBLY DETAILS1
/z"ss OOP wsEar
—�1
s ue •SO -IISK SS
.s/,6•r
' \ SPACER M 1/16"*HOLE
`1/2•SS EYE DOLT
/a•A wRE ROPE.
3/B'R POLYPRCP"LENE 'N uBLE EYE ONE END AND
r 4-O'x E%T'A MATERIAL. R^iPE hEM,FACTCR" SWAGE ONTO EYE BOL-.
I BAFF� -0 RAVE;RWME-S AT INSTALLED 1/2-13 SrJD 0-HER END
1 12'OC ON Bel•SICES CF
!/94 PL-L—QO—L'-Ilo NOTE EXTRA MATERIAL-GA'-FR EXTRA
IEM_=AZ;`O?Y INS-AIE� MATERIAL A^19 9=x'F S- 2-/2'.'/6'=CH RLBBFR
,`� W,P= - CJSH ON STRiP E%PVC I/i c x 2 x!/'6 55
PAS'ENDS OF AI GL.ES-ONE T^GE'HER B"3/B'-SS
' f I S'A'?-%N EArH SOE OF ... BO-T'w/N..?AtiC wAS�ER A-
�� h$DE FACE BAFFLE i OC uA%
2': I/i SS FB J I� 6"x O' COaEwA�
7/?"a.i SS ANCXOR , r Off'
BOLT, . OC MAX ALL}N'„�E IRON AND COMPRESSION
SLEEVE AND ALL HARDWARE AND
CA13LE TO BE SS 316
SdSRENSO4 ASSE-BLY
'_EE B 12•t E%fit} 1"'a LOOP FOR'tC=SE .A
MATE 1I 1/2 Mlh FACTOR"SEAN,AFTEi
TYPICAL MEMBRANE SEAV N�LOOP.CCL5L-v BA,K AND
- FACTORY$EAM AS SH,',AN-2.
M V
TO CONCRETE CON N B CLEAR BE-A[EV SEAM$
♦o POC PIKE F1UED
_ ,MTH CEME4T GROLI-.SEABED
_ - AT BOTH ENDS,SEE B
FLOOR SLAB -
SECTION A
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Figure
OVERMYER RESERVOIR
UNIT NO. 3 3
SAMPLE BAFFLE DETAIL
SCALE: NONE
phase, and will "pay for themselves" during this phase alone. A built set of stairs to the lowest
' area of the reservoirs should be considered. Railing around the entire length of width of the
reservoir sump should be considered. Additional access hatches for both people and equipment
(boats, ventilation equipment, etc.), with safe access over the reservoir roof, should be
' considered. Sumps with permanent sump pumps and fixed discharge piping, along with a
interior potable water washdown system, should also be considered. All of these items are fairly
inexpensive relative to the cost of the project. One accident avoided by implementing any or all
' of these suggestions will be worth the cost.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
' Our proposed scope of services is summarized in an outline format below. The scope of services
is separated into four phases.
Phase A— Services During Design
Phase B — Services During Bidding
Phase C— Services During Construction
tPhase D — Services During Project Startup and Closeout
Phase A— Services During Design
1.0 Coordination with City Project Management
2.0 Coordination with Governmental Agencies
' 3.0 Investigations
4.0 Design
5.0 Design Submittals
' 6.0 Reviews and Approvals
7.0 Construction Cost Estimate and Schedule
Phase B— Services During Bidding
1.0 Submittal List
' 2.0 Addenda
3.0 Pre-Bid Conference
4.0 Bid Opening
5.0 Conformed Contract Documents
Phase C—Services During Construction
' 1.0 Construction Documents
Request for Information (RFI's) and Substitutions
' Shop Drawings
Change Orders
Record Keeping
' 2.0 Coordination
3.0 Meetings
' Phase D—Services During Project Startup and Closeout
1.0 Start-Up and Testing
2.0 Project Closeout
1
1 � •
1 .
III. Project Team
1
1 - Richard Brady& Associates
Richard Brady & Associates is a civil engineering and construction management firm
specializing in the planning, design and construction management of drinking water
reservoir storage projects. The firm has the necessary capabilities, experience and
expertise to provide quality engineering design and construction assistance services as the
1 Designer for the City's Overmyer Reservoirs Project.
Of note, Richard Brady & Associates (RBA) was recently selected to provide planning,
' design, and construction support services over a 5-year period to the City of San Diego's
Water Department for improvements- and seismic upgrades to the concrete dams and
outlets towers at four City owned reservoirs. The project, with an approximate
1 construction value of $8 million, has similar elements to the Overmyer Reservoirs
Rehabilitation Project. Additionally, Richard Brady & Associates recently completed the
design of a 35 MG prestressed concrete water storage reservoir for the City of San Diego.
1 Once constructed, the reservoir will be the largest prestressed concrete reservoir in service
in the United States.
1 Kleinfelder
Kleinfelder is one of the largest privately owned engineering firms in the U.S. and an
1 Engineering News-Record "Top 100 Design Firm." Headquartered in San Diego,
California and with offices in Irvine, Long Beach and Diamond Bar, Kleinfelder has a staff
of approximately 180 engineers, geologists, laboratory technicians and field technicians in
1 the southern California area.
' KEY PERSONNEL
The key personnel that make up the RBA team were carefully selected based on their
1 experience in the planning, design, construction and start-up of water storage projects
similar to the Overmyer Reservoirs Project. The organization chart on the following page
presents the RBA Design Team"
1 PROJECT MANAGER
rRick Brady, P.E., DEE, our proposed Project Manager for the Overmyer Reservoirs
Project, has the experience necessary to successfully lead the RBA Design Team. Mr.
' Brady is the President of RBA having 21 years of experience in water resources, with an
emphasis in the planning, design and construction management of water supply, treatment,
storage, and pumping facilities. For the past 12 years he has served as project manager for
' the design and construction of the Alvarado Treatment Plant expansion for the City of San
1
' Diego. When completed, the project will increase the plant capacity from 120 MGD to
g P P J P P Y
200 MGD. As part of the Alvarado project, Mr. Brady managed the design-build delivery
' method of two 21 MG pre-stressed concrete regulating reservoirs that serve as clearwells
to the treatment plant. In addition, Mr. Brady has been the project manager for several
water reservoir design-bid-build projects including the 17.1 MG Los Coches Reservoir.
' Mr. Brady is currently the Project Manager for the design of a 35 MG prestressed concrete
reservoir. Because of Mr. Brady's recognized expertise in water storage retention design
' he is frequently called upon to provide forensic engineering to owners investigating
design/construction defects. Mr. Brady recently concluded forensic engineering analysis
of excessive leakage on a 20 MG conventionally reinforced concrete reservoir. He also
' was retained by Mesa Consolidated Water District in 1995 to investigate water quality and
design problems with their newly (at the time) constructed 18 MG buried prestressed
concrete reservoir.
' Mr. Brady's responsibilities as Project Manager during the design encompass several
areas, including but not limited to development of design alternatives that will give the
' City increased operational capabilities and enhance water quality beyond those outlined in
the rehabilitation alternatives study.
' ALTERNATE PROJECT MANAGER/
DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES MANAGER
Mike Herrmann P.E. will act as Alternate Project Manager - Mr. Herrmann has 14
years of experience as a Project Manager/Project Engineer for numerous water system
' capital improvement .projects including_large concreter•-reservoirs, pipelines and pump
stations for various municipalities, agencies, and special districts. Mr. Herrmann is the
Project Engineer for the on-going design of the City of San Diego's 35 MG Earl Thomas
' Reservoir project. Mr. Herrmann was also Project Engineer for the evaluation of the
existing -Earl Thomas Reservoir, which, after the evaluation was completed, led to the
recommendation by RBA that the existing reservoir be replaced.
' Mr. Herrmann will be lead design engineer during the all phases of the design providing
direction and coordination with geotechnical, environmental, surveying, and structural
engineering. In addition Mr. Herrmann will be coordinate OA/QC procedures with Tim
Pflum, RBA's QA/QC Manager. Mr. Pflum will use established procedures from RBA's
QA/QC program. Mr. Herrmann will also coordinate a constructability review with senior
' RBA staff not directly involved with the project.
' STRUCTURAL
Lee Biggers, S.E. will provide the Structural Engineering for the project. Mr. Biggers
' provides a significant depth of experience and participation in the structural and seismic
design of reservoir rehabilitation projects. He has practiced in the field of structural
engineering for 32 years and has been a California licensed structural engineer for 28
1
years. The spectrum of his expertise covers the categories of institutional, commercial,
industrial, single and multi-story residential, schools, waterfront, bridges, water and
wastewater treatment, airfield structures, special structures, forensic investigations;
rehabilitation, seismic studies, and expert witness litigation services.
Recently he completed the structural engineering for the rehabilitation design of four
conventionally reinforced, partially buried reservoirs at Marine Corps Base Camp
Pendleton. The project involved seismic upgrades and replacement of both concrete and
timber roof structures. He has participated as a value engineering review team member for
numerous water and wastewater treatment districts.
GEQTECHNICAL
Liz Smith P.E., G.E. will be the Lead Geotechnicat Engineer. Ms. Smith has 15 year of
experience conducting geotechnical engineering evaluations for water storage,
transmission,treatment, and distribution systems.
Ms. Smith conducted the geotechnical design recommendations for the foundations of the
twin 21 MG Alvarado Regulating Reservoirs and the 35 MG Earl Thomas Reservoir for
the City of San Diego. Ms. Smith has highly specialized experience in the geological
requirements for seismic design of darns, reservoirs and transportation structures.
. ic�zae� e¢d�r d_WA ✓r.4 8 :�°ch�.:�
i •
IV. Technical Qualifications
1
Staff members that make up the RBA team possess a;tr==d arnotifitwo- expe"n`enc `
' €:with—cariventionally reinforced concrete and- prestressed- concrete--water- retention
I'structures_ We understand the City's desire to contract with a designer possessing broad
experience in planning, design, and construction of water retention structures. The RBA
1 team relies-on significant_in-house resources insuring_the availability of-the--necessary-w
services•for the overall success of the Overmyer Reservoirs Rehabilitation Design Project
(ORRD). The following projects are a combination of RBA staff and corporate
1 experience. These projects were selected based on similarities to the ORRD Project. Key
RBA team members have significant roles in each project listed. We pride ourselves on
the quality of our work and invite you to contact any of the references listed in the
proposal.
The following table alone illustrates Rick Brady's experience with similar drinking water
1 reservoir storage projects:
' 7,19(97)6 ,1
3 5 MG Prestressed Concrete City of San Diego Predesign, Design
(Earl Thomas) (on-going)
1 18 MG Prestressed Concrete, Mesa Consolidated Study of Existing
Buried MWD Reservoir Design
1994 2 0,21 MG Prestressed Concrete City of San Diego Predesign,Design, CA
1 1993 1 @ 30.3 MG Conventional Concrete, Miramar Seismic Evaluation,
Gunite Bottom WTP Dive Inspection
1992 1 @ 52 MG Conventional Concrete Sydney Water Predesign,
1 w/Float Cover Board Design
1989 1 @ 20 MG Conventional Concrete, Alvarado Seismic Evaluation,
Gunite Bottom WTP Dive Inspection
1 1989 1 @ 35 MG Conventional Concrete, Alvarado Seismic
Gunite Bottom WTP Evaluation
1987 1 @ 10 MG Concrete with Steel Sweetwater Rehabilitation of
Roof Authority WTP Existing Reservoir
1983 1 @ 17 MG Conventional Concrete, Padre Dam Predesign, Design,
Buried MWD CA, CM
1983 1 @ 18 MG Conventional Concrete, Sweetwater Predesign
Buried Authority WTP
1 1982 1 @ 6 MG Floating Cover Roof City of Predesign,
Replacement Oceanside Design, CM
1 •
' 17.1 MG Los Coches Reservoir
' The 17.1 MG Los Coches Reservoir is a 216'x 456'x 25' deep conventionally reinforced
concrete reservoir constructed by Padre Dam Municipal Water District between 1983-
1985. The reservoir is completely buried and covered with 18" of soil. 220-20" diameter
' columns support the reservoir roof. The reservoir is separated into two cells by a center-
dividing wall. The inlet and outlet piping is 36" diameter. The reservoir construction
involved the placement of over 8,000 cubic yards of concrete and more than 20,000 linear
' feet of waterstop and joint sealant. The reservoir was constructed at a cost of$3,051,000.
There were no change orders.
' Team: Richard Brady Services: Preliminary& Final Design,
Design Engineer Construction Management
Construction Manager
t Client: Padre Dam MWD—Pat Rymer
Cost: $3.0 Million (619) 448-3111
10887 Woodside Ave. Santee, CA
t SK£LTION I
E-r
e-
' IFS/ _ c"•,.•
E _� rarmor ru
lui if:
I I
' , BFE6NfN.OETNLL I I E��EXI r 6/101/NO SL PEE15 STEE EP
ryarrlMW prfr awxu MAN !IMN)TO I VENT
•[.![ •YO /.r
' 20 MG 520-3 Zone Reservoir for Otav Water District
The 20 MG 520-3 Zone Reservoir is a 275'x 428'x 24' deep conventionally reinforced
' concrete reservoir constructed by Otay Water
District between 1989-1991. The reservoir is
completely buried and covered with 24" of soil.
260-24" diameter columns support the reservoir
roof. The reservoir is separated into two cells by
a center-dividing wall. The inlet and outlet
' piping is 36" diameter. The reservoir
construction involved the placement of over
0,000 cubic yards of concrete and more than
' 23,800 linear feet of waterstop and joint sealant.
The reservoir was constructed at a cost of
approximately $5,000,000.
1
df-Vm>w& 10 w W." '- .AK..y.,4
1
' The project is currently in litigation. Richard Brady & Associates was hired to provide
wip" wiuwas..sesvices regarding the reservoir design and construction, with particular
' emphasis on the roles and duties of the construction manager. Current allegations include
poor quality of concrete work, inadequate placement and support of rebar, and inadequate
placement of waterstop and joint sealant that has lead to visible corrosion of reinforcing
' steel and excessive leakage into the underdrain system.
Team: Richard Brady - Expert Witness Client: Colleen Lowe, 619-692-0800
' Grace Brandon Hollis, LLP
3555 Fifth Avenue Suite 100
Completion: December, 2000 Fee: $25,000 San Diego, CA 92103
1
' Alvarado Reaulatine Reservoin & Pipelines
As overall Project Manager for the Alvarado Treatment Plant Expansion and
' Rehabilitation Project,RBA staff performed site analysis, preliminary design, managed the
final design and construction inspection of two circular, 21 MG, pre-stressed concrete,
partially buried reservoirs that serve as clearwells to the treatment plant and the pipelines
' connections into and out of the twin reservoirs. Piping ranged in size from 12-inch to 96-
inch diameter, including tape-wrapped mortar lined and
' coated steel piping. The piping pass through a partially
buried valve vault with one 42 —inch and six 72-inch
butterfly valves.
' Team: Richard Brady—Project Manager
Liz Smith — Geotechnical Engineer
' Services: Siting Analysis, Preliminary Design,
Project Management, Construction Inspection
' Completion: 1996 Cost: $40 Million Client: Javier Saunders, (619) 686-6246
(c/o The Port of San Diego)
' Existina Earl Thomas Reservoir Evaluation
' Located at the City of San Diego's Alvarado Water
Treatment Facility, Earl Thomas Reservoir was
' constructed in 1957. The existing 35 MG
earthen/concrete reservoir falls under the ever-
increasing scrutiny of the State of California
' Department of Safety of Dams. The reservoir is
experiencing severe deterioration. The City of San
Diego contracted with Malcolm Pirnie/Richard Brady
' & Associates to perform an assessment of the condition
of the reservoir that acts as a clearwell for the plant. Upon completion of the study it was
•
' determined that replacement was needed but the timeframe was unclear. RBA was then
asked to prepare alternatives evaluations and cost/benefit analysis for each alternative.
' Team: Rick Brady—Project Manager
Mike Herrmann—Project Engineer
Liz Smith -Geotechnical Engineer
' Completion: 2000
' Services: Conditions Assessmeat,Alternatives Cost/Benefit Analysis
Client: Norm Pierce, (619)465-7520
' City of San Diego
600 B Street Suite 700
San Diego, CA 92121
t
' New 35 MG Earl Thomas Reservoir
As part of the Alvarado Treatment Plant rehabilitation the City of San Diego Water
Department contracted with Richard Brady & Associates to Design and Manage the
replacement of a conventional 35 MG earthen/concrete reservoir with an acceptable
alternative. Richard Brady & Associates was asked to
evaluate alternative reservoirs designs. The site has
ample room and excellent geological conditions so a
pre-stressed concrete design was chosen as the best
' alternative. The preliminary design was just
completed. The circular tank will have an inside
' diameter of 406 feet and an interior height of 39 ft. (C,
Richard Brady & Associates will also provide p
construction management when the project goes into t
construction in the last quarter of 2001.
' •r.Mr _
Team: Rick Brady—Project Manager
Mike Herrmann -Project Engineer
' Liz Smith - Geotechnical Engineer
' Completion: 2002 Estimate of Probable Cost: $30 Million
Services: Siting Analysis, Preliminary Design, Project Management, and
' Construction Management.
Client: Norm Pierce, (619)465-7520
' City of San Diego
600 B Street Suite 700
San Diego, CA 92121
1
' gPinlwd cF,_�/iueaarlae 12 °�"�"°
' 10 MG Sweetwater Reservoir Rehabilitation r "`
The Sweetwater Reservoir is a conventionally reinforced, partially
' buried concrete reservoir that acts as a clearwell for the Sweetwater 6m=ZWE'
Water Treatment Plant. Rehabilitation design services were
required when, during a routine inspection by Sweetwater
' Authority personnel, it was discovered that a portion of the roof was deteriorating from
exposure to chlorine. The design included replacement of the entire roof structure, a new
ventilation system, and modification of inlet and outlet structures to improve circulation.
1 Team: Rick Brady—Project Engineer
' Completion: 1989 Services: Preliminary and Final Design, Construction
Support Services
t Client: Roland Rossmiller, C/O Padre Dam Municipal Water District
(619) 448-3111
' The following table illustrates our firm's experience with Pump Station projects:
' Lake MurrayPump Station 85 nr•d San Diego 17 Pump Station 60 m d
College Ranch Pump Station 11.5 m d Miramar Ranch North Booster P.S. 6.5 m d
Bayview Pump Station 3.9 m d Shelter Island Wastewater Improvements 350 gpm
Del Cerro Kghlands Pump Station 7.0 m d Val Vista WTP Raw Water 140 m d
' International Business Center 500 gpm Vista Verde Pump Station 3 m d
Del Cerro Hi¢hlands Pump Plant
' Provided preliminary and detailed design services for improvements to the City of San
Diego's San Carlos Water Pump Station. The modifications included expansion of the
' underground pump station structure, installation of new vertical turbine pumps, an
emergency generator, new pump suction and discharge piping, and
demolition of an existing hydro-pneumatic tank.
' The improvements will increase the station's pumping capacity
from 4,300 m to 5,700 m improve pumping reliability with the
> gP gP P P P g Y
' replacement of old and deteriorated equipment, and improve access
to pumping equipment for maintenance personnel by providing
more working space within the station.
' Team: Rick Brady—Project Manager
Mike Herrmann - Project Engineer
' Services: Preliminary and Detailed Design Services
' Client: Mike Conner, (619) 533-7484
City of San Diego, Water Department
' J�Pkrfa�..�iady �.sd/waMa(v 13 W..e&0�..1&"AmA .-0 .y..�
V. Project Schedule
' Our proposed schedule is included on the following page. We have adjusted two
apparent errors in the dates listed in the Request for Proposals. On Page 9, the
' Design Complete date should ready February 11, 2002 (not 2001). On Page 10, the
Begin Construction date should ready May 2002 (not 2003). We concur with the
approximate 18 month construction schedule duration indicated in the Request for
' Proposal. However, we suggest that the City plan for an additional b months of
construction time due to the nature of the work. From our experience on similar
construction efforts, we believe planning for a construction duration of 24 months is
' more appropriate.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
14
1
OVERMYER RESERVOIRS REHABILITATION DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
b TaA131s1� _ p�aton $tat F# J J A S T O N 6 J F NI A 3d J J A D N p J F M�A Y J J A S O N p J F ll A V J J A 5 D N p J F M jA M J J A S O N O J
7 Otrf]itNM RESERYOM RE71ARWAMN 1£SA 795d 11i01' 7,7110s
.. ..
_ _� i70d, "I': y17A3 � '
3 Nmm to Proceed 0d: Mum ..W IA31 t 4
4 104 Beers 01 Oesy1 Repmd(BOOR) 60d d11101'. galml
i OAAPOC Review 14d owl' 42107
0 .C117b Revs. .. - 14d. DMOM1 .t 3kl II}
7 Review vvft� 3d: tO-Itg1: 70H5A1
0 Pemd Aylrizilm ..... . 3d' IOH001:��10f11101
>< ErrY�nsr�i panmelhl>4a(tLN.py 3d 10R9107+ 1wzm
t0 WS pa>+Ga P71ese 6W *2t*l: tTrMWI
25d' 1Y2fAi1; 10t2401 .
72 .. QMX R.A. - ._.. ... 7d. WRAgt i glrRm .
t7 G078 Review 21d 11;26 127A7 r.
U Renew lNaAdtfiop... .. - 3d 12RWM. 12'12A7
t3 30'1L Oesr�11}heer i2d t7J3101 ..ty40V '
10d 12J301 i2nlom
17 .. OAAX Review 5d lit17N1' 1771A1
t0 city Fin ... 14d lzwrl: 1ri0gn
is Renew Wallymp 3d IN116' 7tiiW
is 7dn11or~rt�nprtem a4d' t7' afio:
i7 padpl 5d II903 1n5w
>� QAJOC Fierlew 3d Ira@' IY M
22 Ceyd Review ._ 7d 1/65 : 2502 .
L RaysrVfttdwp
. .. 74 7/B+D2- 7/607 i .
i3 1=pv>fe Rwv wr Commend 3d: 2i7 i 2'11M
is ,+hmnYl Su d My— 0d 2ri 1A2' 2n 11@ 7 .
37 Ca4111sl6l Ph, .... ..469d 2112A2 IV30M
is Petr.A.'Fndlenmw"Ranter 12W 212R4 Tram
b Advertise .. ... .. 20d 3r4W 3r%w
i0 Bid Phase 20d 40102 56M
31 . . AwsJ .. .. 40d SAW'. drAW .
1t? .Carmomarl ..... 3Wd: 711502 14r30t13
33 3124HplAs8gllssndTr8b 1p ... W2 121IA3; Z2004
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Task �: �=-���= Milestone# Summery�W
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
4 M --- ----
VI. Statement of Offer &
1
Signature
1 Richard Brady & Associates has carefully reviewed the Standard Form of Agreement
with. the City of Huntington Beach, with particular regard to the indemnity and
1 insurance provisions, and has NO exceptions to the standard contract.
Richard Brady & Associates authorizes this proposal including costs and rates
1 contained herein, is valid for a period of 90 days from this date, April 23, 2001.
1Ifichard D. Brady, P.E., DEE
President
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
�ea�arrl d 15wove X.
1
' RICHARD D. BRADY
' EDUCATION Water Filtration Plant. Responsibilities include
preparation of plan and profile, and detailed design
B.S., Civil Engineering drawings. The facility will pump filtered water from
t San Diego State University, 1980 the Alvarado Water Treatment Plant into the
Authority's Aqueduct (Pipeline 4) at a pumping rate
of 10 to 100 cubic feet per second, for delivery to
' REGISTRATION the City's mid-city distribution service area. The 60
mgd pumping plant will feature 6 vertical turbine
Civil Engineer in Califomia, No. 36175 pumps, flow control valves and state of the art
instrumentation and controls.
' Diplomate,American Academy of Environmental Two Partially Buried 21 MG Prestressed
Engineers
Concrete Reservoirs (Client: City of San Diego,
California). Project Manager for the construction of
Mr. Brady has 21 years of experience in water the reservoirs. These are the largest prestressed
resources planning and in the design, management, concrete reservoirs in California. A portion of the
and construction administration of drinking water roof of one of the reservoirs became a Native Plant
' supply projects. His fields of specialization include Demonstration Garden featuring plants indigenous
predesign, design, value engineering, construction to San Diego. From this garden, the nature study
management, and start-up services for many large area of the canyon below and areas surrounding the
' drinking water treatment plants, pump stations, and plant are interpreted. The design not only provided
reservoir projects. the City with storage facilities that meet their
present and future needs, but concurrently benefits
a greater public understanding of water issues.
' EXPERIENCE Del Cerro Highlands Pump Station
Rehabilitation Project (Client: City of San Diego,
' 200 mgd Alvarado Water Treatment Plant Water Utilities Department). Project Manager for
Expansion and Rehabilitation Project (Client: the design of the project. The existing pump station
Malcolm Pimie/City of San Diego). Project will be replaced by a new 3900 gpm, 210 hp facility,
Manager for the completion of the detailed design including a 140 kW natural gas driven generator.
' phase of the project. The Phase II design includes
rehabilitation of the existing flocculation and Point Loma Water Tank and Pipeline Project
sedimentation basins, and filters; new flocculation (Client: City of San Diego, Metropolitan Wastewater
' and sedimentation basin; and a renovation of the Department). Project Manager for the design of a
existing Operations Building. completely buried 650,000-gallon prestressed
concrete reservoir.
Alvarado Water Treatment Plant Filter Backwash
t System Rehabilitation (Client: Malcolm Pirnie/City 40 mgd Lower Otay Filtration Plant Expansion
of San Diego). Project Manager for design and Project City of San Diego, California. The work
construction assistance for 1.1 million gallon included the complete rehabilitation of the existing
' prestressed concrete circular washwater tank and plant and the construction of a new 75 mgd (1050
associated piping, pumping and flow control HP) raw water pump station, rapid mixing, two two-
equipment to replace the existing filter backwash stage flocculation and sedimentation basins, and
system for eight 120 mgd filter modules. eight new filters. Other new facilities included
' chemical feed and storage, chlorine feed and
storage, a 3100 square foot expansion of the
San Diego 17 Flow Control / Pumping Facility existing Operations Building, and a 600 KW
(Client: City of San Diego / San Diego County emergency system. Services provided included
Water Authority). Project Manager for the project predesign and design.
which began with a siting study and progressed
through final design. The project includes a flow
' control and pumping facility at the City's Alvarado
Richard D. Brady
' Page 2
3.3 MG Shadowridge (Lupine Hills) Reservoir,
' Vista 1mgarhon District, Vista California.
Services provided included predesign, design and
construction management of a partially buried
' prestressed concrete reservoir.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Public Works Association
American Water Works Association
' San Diego County Water Works Group
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
Brady, R. D., "Activated Carbon Processes," in
Water Treatment Plant Design, American Water
' Works Association, American Society of Civil
Engineers, McGraw-Hill, 1997.
' Brady, R. D., and Millar, R. M., "Art and the
Engineer: The Alvarado Water Treatment Plant
Expansion and Rehabilitation," 1993 AWWA
Engineering and Construction Conference,
Cincinnati, OH, March 1994.
Brady, R. D., "Alvarado Water Treatment
' Expansion and Rehabilitation," Proceedings, 1992
AWWA Annual Conference, Vancouver, B.C., June
1992.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
MICHAEL A. HERRMANN
EDUCATION Rainbow MWD respectively. The project requires a
surge and hydraulic analysis. Results of the
B.S., Civil Engineering analysis will be used to specify flow control
' San Diego State University, 1988 equipment likely to include sleeve valves and
venturi meters. Age and severe cavitation problems
REGISTRATION dictated that this facility be replaced with a state-of-
the-art flow control facility capable of handling the
' Civil Engineer in California, No. 50198 high pressures from the Authority's aqueduct and
the varying demands from the adjacent water
districts.
' Mr. Herrmann has 12 years of experience in civil SDCWA Interim Filtered Pipeline(Client: Malcolm
engineering, with an emphasis in the planning, Pimie / City of San Diego). Project Engineer for the
design and construction of public works projects, construction of 720 feet of 30-inch steel pipeline
including water transmission and distribution and an aboveground metering and pressure
systems, water and sewer main replacement reducing station. The pipeline transfers treated
projects, and large diameter sewer interceptors. water from the San Diego County Water Authority's
Pipeline 4 Aqueduct, a 108-inch treated water
pipeline in Lake Murray Boulevard. A combination
EXPERIENCE pressure reducing and metering station is included
as part of the design. The pressure
Eastlake Greens 30 MG Reservoir (Client: Otay reducing/metering station consists of parallel
Water District). Project Engineer during the design. above-ground 24-inch Cla-Val pressure reducing
Responsibilities included preparation of legal valves, followed by twin 24-inch venturi meters with
' descriptions for property and easement acquisition, integral modulating flow control valves.
computer modeling of the water supply network,
hydrologic analysis of the site, coordination of Various Water Main Replacements in the Cities
survey and geotechnical investigations and design of National City and Chula Vista (Client:
' of 5,200 ft. of 48-in. and 2,800 ft. of 20-in. steel pipe. Sweetwater Authority). Project Manager for the
design of 15,800 feet of new PVC and steel water
Point Loma Water Tank and Pipeline (Client: City mains, from 8- to 36-inches in diameter.
' of San Diego, Metropolitan Wastewater Dept.). Responsibilities included utility and property line
Project Engineer for the design of a 650,000-gallon research, and plan and profile design.
prestressed concrete reservoir and 1,000 feet of 12
inch diameter steel pipeline to serve industrial and Otay Second Pipeline Alternative Alignment
' fireflow requirements at the Point Loma Wastewater Evaluation (Client: City of San Diego). Project
Treatment Plant. Engineer for an alignment evaluation to construct
26,000 feet of 54-inch steel pipe that will convey
' Earl Thomas Reservoir Evaluation (Client: treated water from the City of San Diego's Lower
Malcolm Pimie / City of San Diego). Project Otay Filtration Plant to the City's southern service
Engineer for the evaluation of an existing 35 MG area. The evaluation included an environmental
conventionally reinforced, partially buried concrete investigation using the appropriate CEQA criteria,
' reservoir. Responsibilities coordination of structural which considered land use, and biological and
and geotechnical analysis, DSOD interface and the cultural constraints.
completion of a comprehensive report with
' recommendations. Otay Second Pipeline Alternative Alignment
Evaluation (Client: City of San Diego). Project
Fallbrook 3 / Rainbow t Flow Control Facility Engineer for an alignment evaluation to construct
(Client: San Diego County Water Authority). Project 26,000 feet of 54-inch steel pipe that will convey
' Engineer for design of a replacement facility for the treated water from the City of San Diego's Lower
existing Fallbrook 3/Rainbow 1 Flow Control Otay Reservoir to the City's southern service area.
Facility. The new facility will have a 30 cfs/22 cfs The evaluation included an environmental
' capacity for flow to the Fallbrook MWD and investigation using the appropriate CEQA.
1
' A.7!tilJrlOC. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURA C5R LW DATEIMWDD;r�,
Y_3 03/09 01
rRODUC6A TFII TIFICATIE IS 16SWAS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
tONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGFIT9 UPON THE CERTIFICATE
Cavignac & Associates HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR
1230 Columbia St., Suite 850 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Ban biego CA 92101-3547 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
' Pbone: 619-234-6848 Fax:619.234-8601
INSURED~- INsuRERA; St. Paul Fire&a Marino Ins. C
E4$L'JRER0; American Motorists Ins. Co_ichard 9 adyy & ASSOc. Yn RErac, apIC Companies
' 909 Murp yy C ayyon Road, 1116 0 INsaRI'R D: --- ----- ,.,
Son Diego CA 2123
INsl1RER E:
COVFRAGES
' 7116 POLICIES of INSUMANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE B6FJq ISSUED TO TWE!NSURAD NAMED ABOVL FOR THE POLICY PERIOO INDICATED,NOTW.TI ISTAND:Nc
ANY REQUIREME NT,TERM OR COMDITION OP ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER ooCUHENT WITH RESPECT TO WIlCNI THIS CERTiF ICATF MAY OE ILGUCD OR
MAY PERTAIN,THE M311PANCG AFFORDED BV THE POLICIES OESCRIKO HEREIN IS SUMECT TO ALL T115 TIRMS.EXCLUSIONS AND CONDrTION3 Or SUCH
POLICIES.AGGREGATt LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE iMN RIDUreO BY PAID CLAIMS, p�if
L K TYPI wI?jjURANQE POLXIVINUUM •� olTeC m r r$T1L TI(fNi LI111T9
MERALLIAINLITY o1 EACHOCCURRGNCU t 11000,000 -
A X GOMMRRCIALOM14CULLIASILMY RP05657574 05/12/00 05/12/01 ►-RE DAMAGE(AnyOn t xNCTAMED
CLAMS MADE QX OCCUR I MEo ET(Am a+a,Tara—) 65,000
}[ $r4eC{ 3F0217I PERSONAL LADYINJURY 11210001000
Dlkt Contractual t-R. oriwer.>!Li AP=mr GENERALAC,GRfiGATE S 2 r_00d N a00
OCN•LAGOREOATELIM.IT,APPLIESPF.R, PRODUCTS-OOMPIOPAtO 42,000,000
' AUTOMOSR.HLIADILITY COIAKNED511401.6VMrt -�
ANYALRC (Gsawder9 i1,000,000
ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
3CHGDULeDAUT05 (Putpe,,.u") _ S
' A X HIREDALITOS RP06657574 05/12/-00 05/12/01 p[,�ypILYUUURY
Jt:
NON-OVOIRD AUTau ` '� 4wo) 1
PROPE.RTYDAMADQ j
(Tyr sa[6U'Lll
' GARADEUAOiUTY I AUTO ONLY.EAACGIDSNT j' -
ANYAUTO Oir+eRTH/�1V CNIACC S
AUTDON: AGO 6
' I MEG*LIADILII(Y UCN1 OGCURREhC6 j -
OCCUR CLAWS M9% AGC,RCOATE 1
i
DEDUCTIBLE
RETENTION 1 -_
WORXERSCOMPIN3ATIONAND X
R9' I R
GMPLOYE LIAb1Ury
8 17Cw3J7SS801 05/12/00 05J3.z/Gx E.L.eACHACGIDEHT t�Q00L 0n0-
9L.10ISEA5E-EAEMPL S 1,000, 000
E.L-DISEASE-POLICY WWI S 1,000,000
OTNER
C p&OBreszouAI, LtAB ARE0300964 C5/12/00 05/12/01 LIMITS 110001COG
vs�vc, �,00a:
' DE1GRI1TION OF Ofi6RATI0NW=ATI0NN3lverrlCLESNEXrLUNIGM4 ADOED VY SNOORBUMENYMPECIAL PROV1310PO i
*Professional Liability.Claims Made Fora►, Aggregate LLMit POIICy. 334COnSIG �
Costs Included within Limit of Liability.
CERTII!ICATEHOLDER IN I A000MALIM9UREo;µSURE4LETIEIL CANCELLATION
' SA1lPIr$1 OHOULa ANY of THL'ABOVE DESCRIP00 POLICIEA BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION
DATETHER@OF,THE HUNG INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL DAYS WRITTKN
µOTICI TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMEC TO TH[LEFT,OJT►AILUAE TO 00 30 SHALL
i* SAMPLE CERTIFICATE IMPOST HO DBUGATIOH OR LJABILRY OF ANY KENO UPON TK INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR
' FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY t?RRESl1•aTATIYE 1,
]AUTHORIZCD REPKe3ENTATIYE
DorothyAmundson
ACOIip 25-3(7197) OACORD CORPORATION 1988
I"
1 I
�vi� i�ro and irc�►a � u
April 20, 2001
Ms. Deborah DeBow, P.E.
Associate Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Department of Public Works
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Subject: Fee Proposal for Engineering Services
Overmyer Reservoirs Rehabilitation Design
Dear Ms. DeBow,
Thank you for the opportunity to present our fee proposal to provide professional engineering
sexvices for the above-referenced project. We have utilized a Scope of Services outline and fee
template similar to other projects that we have in progress at the current time. We have
reviewed the costs for each phase of the work to confirm the appropriateness of the engineering
fee compared to the cost of construction. Overall, the percentages fall within acceptable
historical ranges for this type of work.
Thank you for considering Richard Brady & Associates for this important project. I personally
commit the highest level of service to the City of Huntington Beach. Please call me if you have
any questions regarding our fee proposal.
S* cerely,
�.�� �
Richard D. Brady, P.E.. DEE
President
\\Rxk%mJ,mbuk\0w=vrr pmp w)\r vm IvLtvr.DOC
4JrG,9✓llr�� �gait �orlrl, mil,�,�G • .�r Lr fn, r �ariirif .9,�1,?�
I�ri:P/496 O�GO • ��' I�'a�/ 4GG G505
' Overmyerfeeestlmate
•
SUMMARY TABLE
TASKS Task Description Fee
City of Huntington Beach Overmyer Reservoirs Project
Phase A Services During Design
1.0 Coordination with City Project Management $49,480
2.0 Coordination with Governmental Agencies $2,196
3.OInvestigations $94,243
4.0 Design Development-General $9,540
5.0 Design Submittals $392,419
6.0 Reviews and Approvals $30,576
7.0 Construction Cost Estimate and Schedule $14,204
Subtotal $592,658
Phase B Services During Bidding
1.0 Submittal List $2,736
2.0 Addenda $12,204
3.0 Pre-Bid Conference $3,296
4.0 Bid Opening $2,016
5.0 Conformed Contract Documents $18,812
Subtotal $39,064
Phase C Services During Construction
1.0 Construction Documents $240,830
2.0 Coordination $61,200
3.0 Meetings $25,284
Subtotal $327,314
Phase D Services During Project Startup and Closeout
1.0 Startup and Testing $19,000
2.0 Project Closeout $16,584
gubtotall $36,684
Totall $994,620
a '
4/20/01
l�/rrt�l, ra�� curl� 1 Overmyerfeeestimate
Overmyerfeeesdmale
Ric Brady Mike rrmam Ti. m eme a ea er a er
TASKS Task Dascrlptbn Pro ct Mare er Asst.Pro'ut Mane r _V_ Project Engineer Assistart En' er Designer CADD out port Oiraet Cost Total
5150 102 10 $60 5 93 $70 45
Hous Fee Horns Fee Hous Fee Hours Fee hours Fee 1-1-8 Fee Hour Fee Hours Fee
PHASE A City of Huntlnyton Beach Ovamuyar Rnsrvoira Project
1.1 Pro ess Reports 20 $3 000 40 1 800 800
1.2 Pro ess Meetirg, 60 $9 000 60 $6,1201 40 $ 200 60 $2.7001 $21 020
1.3 Schedule morhormy 15 $2 250 40 $4 0 1 40 $3 200 $9 530
1.4 Records Management 15 F2 250 40 080 30 $2 400 120 $S 4 $14,130
Subtotal of Task 1 110 $18 500 140 $11 2 Ila $8 800 220 $9 900 $49 480
2.1 Meetkt9s 8 $1 200 8 18 4 $180. $2,W6
Subtotal of Task 2 8 $1 200 8 $816 4 180 $2 106
3.1 lydial Investigations 12 $1 800 16 $1 632 24 $1 920 40 $2 600 16 $1 488 $9 440
3.2 Surveying 8 $818 $20,000 20816
3.3 Property Acqulsdi n(NONE ANTICIPATED)
3.4 Easemerte(NONE ANTICIPATED)
3.5 Title Reports 6 Right of Way(NONE ANTICIPATED)
3.6 Erwkonmertal and Permt Support 12 $i 800 40 $4,080 12 1 116 16 $1 120 8 $300 $31,735 $40.2111
3.7 Geotedrkal Invest ation 4 $600 B 816 10 $800 24 $1,560 $20,000 $23,776
Subtotal of Task 3 28 $4 200 72 $7 344 34 $2 720 64 $4 160 28 $2,804 16 $1,120 8 $380 $71,735 $94 243
4A Co fiance NO FEE
4.2 CityGuideknee NO FEE
4,3 10 Perceol DesignReport Review B 1 200 24 2. 20 61 860 5 508
4A Utility Relocation(NOPE ANTICIPATED)
4.51mestlgation and Shutdown Requkemerts 16 $2 400 16 $t 032 032
Subtotal of Task 4 24 $3 600 40 $4 080 1 1 20 $1 860 1 S9 540
i atd, �taryr yd�r�it/ed 4120/01
1 owmsedee<ssmsro
Ownryerfeees6mate
Pick Asst.rPero'crtr mMamne r im Mike a Jerry er
Project TASKS Task Description AIOC r Desi
S 7 Adrm, 5 rt
D1f0Cl CI Total$150 107 0 93
Fours Fee Fours Fee Foae Fee Hw. Fee hour. Fee Fous Fee lour. Fee Hours Fee
5A Submittals NO FEE
5.1.1 BODR 12 Stew 24 3 600 8 $1,2DO fi0 A000 16 $2 400 Is $2,400 16 $2.400 $22,N2
5.1.2 60 Percent Desl n Submittals r
1 General 57,110 $7110
2 Demolition $11 376 $11 375
3 Structural $32,706 $32 706
4 Mechanical $36 972 $38,972
5 Cathodic Protection
5 Electrical $17,064 $17,064
7 lrretnrnentabon $15,642 $15642
5A.3 90 Percent Desian Submittal
1 General 1 $12,443 12"
2 Demolition $19,908 $19908
3 Sruttural 545,789 $45,789
4 Mechanical 1 1 $51,761 $51 701
5 Cathodic Protection
6 Electrical $27,565 $27 565
7 Instnmentation $25,266 5 268
5.1.4 100 Percent Design SubmiHal
1 General $4,4791 $4479
2 DemoBion $7 167 37A67
3 Structural $15.00 $15,850
4 Mechanicai 917,917 $17,917
5 Cathodic Protection
6 Electrical
510,750 $10,750
7 Instnmeraation
$8,654 $9,854
Subtotal of Task 5 12 $1,800 24 $3,600 8 St 200 fi0 E9,000 16 2400 16 2400 16 E2,400 f369,619 5392,419
�iafaed lrud� tdarralev 2 4/2oro1
o.
6 6.ONeviewsand Approvals
_• � ��llCisJ��__��l`I[i'1'J�IIIL"L'1_�__��_�
7 7.00onstruction Cost Eshnrateand Schedule
--
1 1.0 Submdtal Lisl
2 2.0 Addenda
9 O.OPrr-Sd Conference
J d.OBid Opening
5 5.0Conformed Contract Documents
�r��__��11C5!.iJ��z7l'.L'1����Zll'W"�lSlfA'•J-
1 1.0 Construction Documents
• •.• . �''�®"�ll'.Ri1J__� rt��Z14.'J____�1:1t']':9-�ZrJb:'.�J
IARec
' -
®''
2 2.00oordinalion
___________-____�-
• - ��ZkL:!®"ITd:IGiJ�'��.' r��'�Z1L•:!.'l��®�__-�
O.—yerfeeestimele
a Mike rrmem I Tim Randy Me— Mike ea erry a er
TASKS Task Description Pro'ct Mena er Asst.Project Manager QA/QC Project Erdineer Assistant Engineer Des D ort Admin. ort Direct Cost Total
150 102 107 $65 S93 S70 5
Hours I Fee Hour. Fee 1... Fee Hers Fee Hour I Fee Moue Fee Hours Fee Hours I Fee
3.1 Preconstuction Conference B $1 200 16 $1,632 4 180 $3,012
3.2 Construction Progress Meet', 40 $8 000 120 $12 240 18 240
3.3 Partnering Meetings 16 $2 400 16 $1,632 $4 032
Subtotal of Task 64 $e 600 152 $15 504 4 1B0 $25,2a4
PHASE 0 Services Dud DudM Project Startup and Closeout
1.1 Start-Up Review 16 52400 20 $2,040 $4,"0
1.2 Factory and Shop Tests 40 $4.080 40 3 200 $7,280
1.3EgLipmerg Field Tests 24 2 448 24 1 920 $4.388
1.4 System Functional and Performance Test I i6 $1.632 16 $t 280 $2 912
Subtotal of Task 1 16 $2 400 100 $10 200 80 $6 400 $19 ODO
Z2.2
l Impaction and Contractor Pu chlist 8 $1 2D0 16 1 632 2 832
Built Drawwgs 16 $1.632 40 $3,720 120 $B 400 $13,762
Subtotal of Task 4 8 $f 200 32 $3 284 40 $3,720. 120 Se 400 $16,504
982 $102.3001 2184 5227 880 100 t1111,0441 924 $78120 724 $M 484 232 $22,4881 240 S7 B 080 1182 $64,8701 W11,364 JM620
is itrl, taa�! S3,ieto�ia�eA 4 4/20t01
oem,.Aoearam.or
glad 30 01 03: 27p Richard Oradd (8581496-0505 p. 2
AC-ORD - CERTIFI TE OF LIABILITY INS NCFs.OP ID Z DATB;MMODIYY)
x 3 05/29/01
PRODUCER /' [ THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
g �� ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
Cavi nac & Associates 5 HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR
1230 Columbia St., Suite 850 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
San Diego CA 92101-3547 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
Phone: 619-234-6848 Fax:619-234-8601
INSURED INSURERA. UnitedStatevFidelit &&Gu>aranC
INSURERS: American Motorists Ins. Co.
Richard Brady & Assoc. Inc. INSURERC: Securit Ins. Co, of Hartford
4909 Murphy Ca�y23 ROa$, #220 INSURERI
San Diego �A 1
INSURER E:
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING
ANY REOUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT To WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PEA T AIN,Tr4E 114SURANCE AFFORDFD IW THE POUDES DESCRIBED HEREIN 15 SUBJECT TO ALL T'IE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONOITiONS OF SUCH
POLICES.AGGREGATE LIMITS S-IDWM MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED ev PAID CLAIMS.
INSR PGLICYEFTYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER LIMITS
LTA DATE M1F GATE MECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION
GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S 1,0 00,0 0 0
A X COMMEACIA.GENERAL LAB LITY B K 0 0 8 5 7 3 4 3 05/12/01 05/12/02 FIRE DAMAGE(Any on@ fie) S300,000
CLAIMS MADE I x I OCCUR NED EXP(Any ono puran) .S 10,0 0 D
x Broad Form PERSONAL BADVIN,URY S 1,000,000
X 81kt Contractual $.a- 113=17 11Lx APPLIES GENERAL AGGREGATE 32,000,000
GE.YL AGGREGATE L MIT APPL'£S PER: PRODUCTS-COMPIOP AGG $3,0 0 0,0 0 0
POLICY X 1 JECT LOC
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINDLE LIMIT 3 1,O D D,0 D 0
ANY AUTO (Ea errlaenq
ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
SCHEDULED nu705
(Fe,parson) 3
A X HIRED AUTOS BK00857343 I 05/12/011 05/12/02 BODILYINJLRY 3
X NON-OWNED AUTOS - (Per accident)
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
(Per Deddenll
GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT S
ANY ALTO OTHER THAN EA ACC S
AUTO ONLY: AGG S
EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S
OCCUR CLAIMS MACE 1 "F T$;%!r I� AS 71O F,OU a AGGREGATE S
i
.I 110I,:, City At orney
�RETi 8v: DrIPULY City' ,Attu � 3
RETENTION
S 3
WOR9ER5 CGMPEISAT;011 Ah3 }C TORY L MIT5 ER
B ;EMPLOYERS'LIABILIT/ 7CW33755502 05/12/01 05/12/02 E.L EACH ACCIDENT 51,000,000
E.L-DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE 3 1,000,000
E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT S1,000,000
OTHER
C ` Professional AEE03021319 05/12/01 05/12/02 Limits 1,000,000
Ded. 5,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIOND/LOCATIOMBNENICLEVF-xCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS
Professional Liability-Claims Made Foram, Aggregate Limit Policy. Defense
Costs Included within Limit of Liability. Re: Overmyer Resevoire _
Rehabilitation Deeign. The City, its agenta, officers, and employees and the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach are Additional insured
per attached. 210 days NOC for non-payment.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER y ADDITIGNALINSURED,tNSUkERLMFR,. A CANCELLATION
HUNTI-1 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVP DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE F.XPIRATIO-
DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILL QN9eW1 @W"MAIL _*3 0-DAYS WRITTEN
CITY OF HUN'TINGTON BEACH NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, L
ATTN: DEBORAH DP BOW OR
CHRISTI MENDOZA
2 0 DO MAIN STREET -----------lTP. 7
Or 01
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92640 ADTHORIZEDREPRES T
Dorothy Amundaoa
ACORD 25-S(7197) CACORD CORPORATION i988
Ma y 30 01 03: 2?p Richard Brady (858) 486-0505 P. 3
Policy No. BKO0857343
Owners, lessees Or CouNictors (farm Q
AROHTHONAL INSIIRE9
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POUCY. PLEASE REAR 1T CAREFULLY.
This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following:
LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
Schedule
Name of Person or Organization:
The City of Huntington Beach, its agents, officers, and employees, and
The Redeveloo:nent Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
RE: Overmyer Resevoirs Rehabilitation Design
1. SECTION II - WHO IS AN INSURED is amended to valid and collectible 'other insurance' is provided
include as an insured the person or organization shown by a person or organization who is not shown in
in the Schedule,but only with respect to liability arising the schedule. Then we will share with that valid
out of'your work'for that insured by or for you. and collectible 'other insurance* by the method
described below.
Z. With respect to 1. above the following additional
provision applies: If all of the valid and collectible 'other insurance'
permits contribution by equal shares, we will
SECTION IV. S. Other Insurance is replaced by the follow this method also. Under this approach,each
tollowing: insurer contributes equal amounts until it has paid
S. Other Insurance, its applicable limit of insurance or none of the loss
remains,whichever comes first.
The insurance allorded by this Coverage Part is If any of the valid'and collectible'other insurance'
primary insurance and we will not seek does not permit contribution by equal shares, we
contribution from any valid and collectible "other
insurance" available to the insured unless the will contribute by limits. Under this method, each
Insurer's share is based on the ratio of its
applicable limit of insurance to the total applicable
limits of insurance of all insurers.
CUBF 22 a5 09 99 Includes coovrighted material of Insurvice a servim, Office.Inc..with its permission. Pape t of t
s;apys,gt sed.Insurance:ervn.es Lffite.Int..IS94
RCA ROUTING ?HEET
INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Public Works
SUBJECT: APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
FOR OVERMYER RESERVOIRS REHABILTATION
ENGINEERING DESIGN, CC-1104
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 18, 2001
RCAATTACHMEN.TS ;STATUS '
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached
Contract/Agreement (wlexhibits if applicable)
(Signed in full by the City Attome Attached
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc.
(Ap
proved as to form by City Attome Not Applicable
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attome ) Attached
Financial Impact Statement Unbud et, over $5,000) Not Applicable
Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable
Staff Report (if applicable) Not Applicable
Commission, Board or Committee Report If applicable) Not Applicable
Find in s/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable
EXPLANATION FOR, MISSING:ATTACHMENTS
REVIEWED RETURNED :;' .' FORWARDED
Administrative Staff
Assistant City Administrator (Initial)
City Administrator (Initial)
City Clerk
EXPLANATION 'FOR'RETURN OF ITEM . . .
.
Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use
d T I i F `- o)
RCA Author: DeBow:jm Ext. 5528
6118101
Public Comments summary for
Speaker Norm Westwell
RECErMFFOU
Speakers position on selected agenda items: CE
oow +cw�Y.an►a.e c
D-1 In Favor
D-2 Against — Unnecessary expansion of governmental powers.
D-3 Against — The public NEVER benefits in a no-bid contract Recommend this contract go
to bid.
E-6 Against -- The city is currently paying a Director of Water Operations, an interim
Director of Water Operations, in addition to full time staff. A very substantial sum of
money. These paid employees, and consultant should be performing this type of work. If
they cannot perform the necessary work of the city for normal water projects, either
eliminate the city positions or the consultants. Paying both is absurd.
E-8 Against—New "trial" programs should not be undertaken while the city is in our current
budgetary shortfall.
E-9 Against— $45,000 for change orders! Let's get the project correct from the begining.
An anticipated $45,000 in change orders identifies a project which has not been carefully
planned. Recommend using Grant money more efficiently by eliminating change orders.
E=.10 Against— A 1.2 million dollar expenditure should not be a Consent Calendar Item '.
This is not a routine expenditure. The city has spent a half a million dollars on a police
vehicle locator system that was to last 10 years minimum. The police abandoned it in
less than 5. The city has yet to remove the old system transmitters spread through out
the city.
E-20 Against — If the people cannot enjoy the freedom to celebrate at home; on private
property with safe and sane fireworks, the city should not be permitted to expend
taxpayer money to engage in a monopoly enterprise, collecting money as a result of the
restrictive ordinances it has established. Recommend re-legalizing limited safe and-sane
fireworks within the city limits and creating an ordinance prohibiting the unsafe use of
safe and sane fireworks. Alternate action — Relocate future public fireworks displays
back to the city pier, our cities landmark.
F-1 In Favor — This is a fine example of a much needed and long overdue public project.
H-3a. Against — NYMBY ! This is a feel good politically motivated ordinance that will
serve no useful purpose. The state can't get people to wear seat belts! HB can force
people to purchase "ne kind" of alarm equipment, buoe:can't make them use it. So
what's the point. People must be responsible for their own actions. When the
government removes all responsibilities from the people, the people are no longer
responsible. The government is not here to protect children from drowning. If it were, it
would be providing free swimming lessons. The government IS here to protect the
liberties of individuals.
Addendum — See U.S. Constitution
Speakers oral comments:
Speaker feels 4`h of July fireworks signs are ambiguous and cause confusion.
(Speaker provided sign examples to council)
Speaker against further funding of the D.A.R.E program. Reason: D.A.R.E. has been shown
over and over to be an ineffective waste of money.
Speaker presented council with a 10 year follow up study by the Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology with findings supporting the position that the program is a ineffective
waste of money.
This study may be found on the internet at:
http://www.apa.org/j ournals/ccp/cep674590.html
Presented council with additional background information by Jodi Upton and Kim Kozlowski
of the Detroit News. This information may be found on the internet at:
http:;i`www.detnews.com/specialreports/2000/dare/skeptics/skeptics.htm
Speaker against increasing fees for liability insurance for the rental of park facilities such as
fire pits and barbecues. The city already has liability insurance for public property. We don't
need insurance on top of insurance. These are public facilities intended to be used by the
public. The public must not be charged over and over again to use it's own facilities.
Speaker would like clarification of the reaffirmation of HB3-TV public policy for upcoming
consideration. The cities current position is this is a "government" channel intended to
showcase the cities position on issues and highlight city functions in a positive light for the
public. The policy goes as far as to exclude the public because as a "government channel" the
public has no right to access. I would like to remind my elected officials. this is representative
government OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND FOR THE PEOPLE. Our
government is the people themselves. The city has put itself into a position of "us against
them" mentality . Instead of working with the community, it now works to oppose, oppress and
censor the community. The public does not intend to continue paying for city sponsored
propaganda.
Recommend action: Direc*aff to update HB-3TV policies a� rocedures for reaffirmation.
. p p P
These policies and procedures should show intent and use of the facilities and must show it will
operate in the best interests, benefit and necessity of the community and allow for public input
and interaction.
Alternate action: Eliminate HB3-TV because it only benefits public officials does not benefit
the community at large.