Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVAN DELL & ASSOCIATES, INC - 1986-07-21AD ITT - to J"A. ICP/"T ll rrni 0 2000 MAIN" STREET, r� `�� �1 CALIFORNIA.926:� OFFICE OF,,THE CITY CLERK-_ >/ e August 6', 1986. Assoc 1 178111' tartwHd't,t, RQa( =� ?� vine 4al'ifornia92714 a` " UThe City Council of the City of Hunfii�gton 'Beac�z � ' ')ts regular' eeting held Ju,1y 21; 1,986, `approved ,a'r,' eng7'neer6ri -consultant " agrdement between the City and your_-f_i_r_m to preparL an,- assess ment',feasi'%'j"litystudy for propased down u.;n parking structures ` � t in the Hurtington Beach. v �Entlosed As an executq(.1coopof the agreement, fornaur' files. � r ; Al �,,c a M. Mentworth f t City_ Cl" k, f i ' AMW:Cl3:bt �k � Enclosures` n x t J iuj G �Lor"134buI y Y'il�#r`�i^rf ksc 21.3� " G ji r ' 1 fTafaphonFi227} }I f 11 1986 - ®ate .�_ APP VED BY CITY CUUN.CXL^ c J Submitted to: Honorable Mayor afid City Cc a z& 1 ✓/ %� t �,7 q__ / t�bt ittod by:, � Charles W. lharpson, City Adcr�i r strat- `" o c= n S Pr ied b1�: Eaul E., Cook; Director at Public i�Tork: c.T� ca.kxr , o Feasibillity Study for Assessment District Financing of Proposed Downto•wri S�ab�t: P;irking Structure ' Consistent witfn Council €policy? [ � fifes { [ � Now Policy or'E xiseption' " Stafemiht of 1AUO, R' ei nii me'ndation; Analysis, Funding Source, $ ' r r4 %lternat'ive Acti�rns, Att�cltiments: Statement of Iss�ie t e The'City=desires-to study the possibility of furding future Cowntown parking - structures thr('ugh an:assessment c'- '.s'tricty Recom-exidat on: - a ^ Au liori-e. e Mayor aar , the City Clerk to execute the Consultant Agreement vith Van Dell. and 10soc�iates"for a. fee, not to exceed $9, 533.00 'A. Analysis. p On' June 1, 1985. the: city .Council- approved bond financing for the first downtown parking structure. The Downtown Paxking Study reviewed by the Ciitr; Council in �. , Ap-gust, 1985 identified a need for, additional stiucI uses ,and suggesthe F ossz bility of funding, by, assessme�nt district. Proposals to investigate'"the possibiiitty .of utilizing assessment district financing for the design and coristruction fad. Jj utarking stnlctt es have been received. B u}din LSource : A ,loanfrom the unappropriated ' general funa balance to the Redevelopment Agency f per iffiei pxoyisions of the stancii�zg operative agreement between the City and the ( Agency. Attachments: Agreement u -� �znstarance Form J C117,P13C:LE:1w = �l „ t, 0 - °N 'UNTINGTON BEACH) INTER -DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ° WMINGTON BEACH J r , w , °o CHA,9 'ES W.'-THOMPSON From ROBERT'J. FRANZ, Chief' ° "City Administrator Administrative Services .Sub ect APZROPRIEi,'ITION,FOR CITY LOAN ;?ate_ ?-,DULY 15,=1986 TO REDS-,VELOPNIENT AGENCY F'CR _ PROI EwSIONAL SERVICES - F.LS. 86-32_ _ � As ,requested sunder the authority of Resolution 483�2, a Fiscal Impact Report has been`-, prepared and submittp relati*P to the. proposed loan by the City to,.the Redevelopment ,^ Y Agency for' purposes. of_, siudyiing , the possibility --of future�'doWntown --parking .financing 4 stauctures througWan assessment d;stricto -Anticipations by the requesting entity are that--inappropriation of $9'533 Would be adequate for this project. ' ; ; Ern affirma-3v a resp f��e �,��;n `City Council will reduce the bQlance of the Uty's unaudited,, unappropriated General Fund to 0.1,873,.795. o' NZ. , Chief Administrativ ervYees Depart nt t . KJFsskd J l\i • , s Or r `fir - r "- 61 e ENGINEERING SERVICES '- AOBr�i�11NT BETWEEN 2 THE CITY` OF HUNTINGTON &&ACH AND VAN ,DELL AND` ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR A FEASIBILITY STUDY THIS AGREEMENT made acid e,tered into this 11th •. day of 1 P/ July ��$IS,' by and between the CITY OF HUN,TINGTgN BEACH, a mi-it1ci'pai corporation of the State of California, hereinafter, ref 4�d to . as, CITY, a and VAN DELL AND ASSOCIATES, INC'' a i California corporation,, hereinafter referred tq s WCONTRACT(�R." � WMEREASib CITY desires to 'engage -the services of- an engineer-- 1 %ng conj�ltant to prepare an asses�,;men't feasibi]ity'study for - s proposell downtown parking s,`a r'uctures in "the City. of Huntington U kaach; and 1 CONTRACTOR has ,been se1?ct�_...-�to il j perform said services , NOW, THERRFORT.itis ag!)eed by O 'ITX and CONTRACTOR as .`.olio,: tt a .Ga WORK STATEMENT CONTRACTOR shall provide all en4',,eera3g services ,as- " r described: in CITY Request for Proposal and Stateme:'"�f and Contractor's proposal dater3=Ma 7 =� �Qqalifa ions (he einaftl c referred to as Exhibit 'Aq), wfi'ch .', ' a s at ached hereto` and�,',.'ncorporated into this Agreement by. tti a G r fererc Said services shall. ometime-s hereiriaftek be'r r-ferrsd'ts ,as, PROJECT �a ' c CONTI�ACTOR' izexeb ".designates`: My. Robert ,Lewi`s, wY'p shaxZ - \1 repro sent it and be its s 1c contact =and�� end in al,l constiita- :.off t or te^Withi C 1 T Y ducting the pierformance o`f this _Agreement" u CITY STAFF AS�,kSTArICE' - CITY s11,ras;ign a, staff cutixdinator to work directly wifh =iV'FtACTO lin' t;ie _prosecu7"»i on of :tl�y �Ar�reemenrt , , ^ SI, ♦ k9 j Qj {r, " If " • r 'q G i A 441 fl G3'. �; _ `mom- -. cl.. � o ,, � Y/" ,^"^^ • J . ; METHCD -.OE' ` PAYMENT A. �ZONTRACTghall be ;entitled to progress payments 'accordance stow. ardjthe fixed fee setiforth in Section 4 herein in wits` the progress Jpayment schedule`, set forth ira _ Exhibit° "A. _and Delivery', of work product: A copy of every techni-: cal me%o,,,"and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to h'1.;„ }f. CITY to„demonstra.te progress toward completion,6f,tasks..; In'the event CITY°rejec}s or has comments `on any such product, CITY °t shall identify`"specific requirements for satisfactory completion. L. Any such product whichv pis not been formally �'accepte � or ,'-; "rejeate''%bv CITY shall be deemed accepted. (' ,The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY any invoice > 1 C r r each„prog easypayment due. "Such invoice shall: ,I ;•� ,, s(I) `Refexen.e this Agreement; (2) Descriae the services performed,• ='c ( 3) ,Show the total amount of the pa yment due; < ' ,(4) =Include a certification,.by a prir-ipal membfr of the CONTRACTOR'S firm that the work,=has 'performed ' �with V bye"en in accordance "`the6 pro-, (r vis'ions= of this Agreement; and cv' s _ (�) Fpi all payments include an,' estimate of,the ' p�er,cEntage of -work completed-'_ � •a ,}, Upon irbmissiop bf athy such invoice, if '"CITY is `9ati,s fled. th CONTRACTOR i sat'isfact?rl= pragessrr t.owa d com- \\making og � asK-s 'in ,accorQanne with tnis Ac3 )_-&ient,h�CITY�) sha1 z, e, > L , Fror;pcly approve the invoice, ill iahich,; event paymeiit shall be , r c G _ 1 7 n 3. Jt , rl tf oo. ,a a "M. m e' wit hin- t h i r t �„ (30) days of receipt of. the invoice by CITY. 9p approval shall nobe,- unreasrak le withheld. If the-., " CITE' doapprove: all .i nvaic'e, r CITY shall notify CANI'RACTOR t in. wratiq af; the reasJns for non-approvaj, within seven t.7) , oaleradar days, .rAceipt,of the,.invoice, and the schedule of .. perf,arz ance set forth a i n .,Exhibit: "A." . shall be suspended until - n the p xt es agreev that past,, performance by Oi TRACTOR i's: in, or n ; = has, been ,bt-oraOt into, compl artce�y ,.or until th s-Agreement is„ teminti.e.� pursuant .ta $ect1:0.>12 hereof: Any billings for, extra work or additional services a4thori d by. th`e CITX nhall be, ihvoiced separately `to the_ CITY.' . � 'i Such'invoice shall d main All of„the information required.under C paragraph 6C.s and in addition shall last the hours :expended and a r � -hOuV1y: rate charged for such time. Sac , ' inaroices shall b'e ' aproed; by CITY,,.if the 'work . pOfformed is in accordance with the ext 'a cork ar additional.. sett ces requested, and,if CITY is sat�f� d that the" statement of hours worked.,and costs incurred is a6 At6. Such approval.; shall not be° unreasonably withheld. Any''idi4ute betwesn Ozhe Far -ties :concerning payment of such an sinvoide sl,sl,l bet eated'as, separate and apart°from the ongoing pert mance of tns�. rema:inde, of thi:'s Agr�omenta DCSPbs'lAN €' P'A�NSC .:Es`-TMATES AN]) OTHER. DOCUMENTS' ' CijT� aC' no leisg2s 'thrt CON7 RAGTOR, S plans and specif'i 1 G f X., c bans, ate in4truments {of:' pkof,essional6ls-ervil;4e., (i�e-v e r thiAess wOAiR&G'fi�.R, agrees that all. materials ,prepared hereunder, rcludin al, on inal ,drawin „des ns re orts both €iel.d 0� J n g e g r reports-, r an'd, offibe notes,r.ca.f,qulat oRs, maps; and,,other documents 'shall '"�1771 P_Ag- rj i c( .'� i i4�'� � p Ot � h` t t, { w(A'4r ��.—'fQ ,r�,•' r l� ,� 'd'. • n e"Iturned over •ta CITY and °sh&31 become its prop rty upon ". PROJECT cccimp�.Etion• or ' earlier termina�;ion of this Aareement. 'j In ,,the ,evehtf this: Agreementa,,,,s termina teb,' stead -materials may "be used bXG.I`TY,. in they compietior,� of PRGJECT however, CITY agrees ta, hcsia;' hari3tl.ess � indemnify "and defend CONTRACTOR against all damages, dlaims ap 'a. losses,- i�66,1,►tding, defense,cos'ts, . ar is+n"g ,out c7f CIT3!t "te--us of CONTRACTOR`S Sans ails specifica'tiIns_, ex0ept . in. the co�blet-iron of ; the PRO�E_CT in the �case.�=of termiraa-' � r n tl.on h06b,f., without CONTRA:CTOP.° prior written authorizatiolz,. � 8. uNDEN'NI'FTCA'I.ION, D FEN -E,. HOLD` HARMi•;E,SS �LDNTRACTGR hereby agr es tc ��efenc7, indemn fyt�tarid o�i' d r' bar ttte'ss�C1,TY, ,a is 0fficexs ,and., emplo.yeds, ifromPand against any. s r, d �s�-a"As , t,l, nsesi, however ca"usedr -arising from CONT ACTOR'S egli;geride=}©r. willful ; t Misconduct i tli ne�-zrmance of:'thig Agreement. Any concurrent negligence or willful misconductcof" CITY,) is offieer"s and employees shall, in ncfway diminish COMPRACmOR°S obligations( hereundei.i�.✓�-, 9. "" AMPENSATI(SN r ; COIs.�J. shall comply C�ith: all of_ the nrovi lens of ., .: g tha�'�doxt� rs e' ,, r t�zhnIYipur �noe and Safe-zy Acts ,o ` the State'" of= ,Cali.fornN �, u s '4" and of r �� `�"� r PP Ica, Ile �grovfsiQns cf Division hemCal. if� Rrr Code andvall amendments thp-retn; and all &-? s�.milar stftr federal; acts ok)aa�_ appli4�bl'e� and shall � demnify, defend and Y bld -harm? Ess CI "from and against ,all Y claims® dsoardse' p,ayTrents, ,suits, acciQne, Proceedings and r " Judgments" o�every nature„and- descry.pion,'(Ctncl:uding'"attnrney'ls i a c 1 c>• IN ees:.za� "costs,4 resented brows ht or xeco�rexed against CITY,,,for o p' Ps g g p° or on, aco® f1iab*iLy"�uridf said acts woich mt ary. a 7Ci Mcurret by reason' of. any: `c ox to be performed by CONTRACTOR 17 urider�'thins Agreement. `� o JO INSURANCE . 'zn "addition to tree U7orkers' Cotepensation 1-nsuranee and r fY{ CONI°i3ACT3R° uvennt to �i2demnif yCITY, > CONTRACTOR .wall obtain and IUrnish ,to CITY- ,:Y4e €gl1oW,ing '!,,nsu:rance policies covering PRQJECT'. , , ��'` ti�� ✓6��-.fir � A. eneral Liability I444 ance. A,%policy of general. public liabi�;,i y insurance, including motor' vehicle.,coverage in a combined single limit bodily ° iniury or ''property damage° of $1,000,000"per 1 t,, = occur;r,ence. Said' policy:: shale+l�Fname' CiTX, *tO h r.x --officers and employees as Ada` ti<onal In reds, andJ 8)ia11 specifically provide that any other. n, ,inqu'tance ,coverage which; may be applicable to the PRO•JECT�.:�holl;be deemed excess coverage and that - t CgNT1R i�TOOS insurance "shall ire primary,,. + ,y Pr ofes.:a`ct+r al Liability Insurance. CANTRALTOR r. T' Aal,l acgua r,e profe'ssi vial liabiw��}y nsin _aAc . %icy coverifg the' work''pexf'ermed by it here under; an amount of not>1es t'h3n '250, Q00. 7 �Cek't' f icates off, Insurance, for 'said poly cies'' ohall be , 34ppr.oved in wr• tvkg 'by the City At tuxney .prior to tUe commence ment`<of- any°wa�k hereunder; All"Certificates of Insv=mane (and+ the polidies of ,iiT6uiance o'r ;endorsements t:heregf) shall prov ce 65 Q .� v, r J t ,A���fi that'Any 'such•Certiticates-and policies shall., not be cancelled or reduced li,n ,coIVerage or limits,other than= .payments of claims �w'ithout t�airty, (30) days' prior written notice_ to CITY. ll. •INDEPENDENT,. CONTRACTOR . i COA\ RACmOR.. is,` fend shall be, acting 'at 'all times ir. the q performance of tfif� 'Xgreemen as an indepe dent contra`ctar.,, 1% 'i 60NTRACTOR shall,•: secdre• at its pen'se's and be . responsible for V v° `any `a71 paymexits, of all Fait - `social se�cur ty, Mate dis ` abiIii�y6insuraftce•compensation, unemployment -,compensation and. other g-ay.i, 11,''deductions: for 'Ct/NTRAC'rOR atad its, officers;, age. is t and�'employ06 .'and; all business licenses,,,if anys in connection " with�be services to be performed hereunder. TERM?N-4TION OF AGREEMENT a p All ' Work required' hereunder •shall be Performed in fr a'ccordanee with the ,standards of the vrofess}iun for similar ,�, t� . gi nals porfcrmAng services in this area at "this time �i �.. u l r: CITY oway •terminate ' CONTRACTOR I S services hereunder at {'.any with or without cause,°and whether or not -PROJECT is fully compleite. Any' termination of this Agreemen�,,by CITY <'shall be I( media 2n•. �ariting�'through.<_the City ` Engineer, ,tice of which shall , be-Aeliverod to C NTRACTOR'as provided";An Section-16 Herein. ti f� 13e 1 `iSSI�NMEIvT; AND<•SUF�CGIvTRACT.IIVG This Agreement,. As a vez�onal:-- serQxL :e contract and the supervislory worEchereunder r" ~`l not be delegated by CONTRACTOFc 1 ' to any other per +,'a vi �ms�tzaa`y without the -'eonscp;t of �CIIIIy, 1. J 6, A .. 7. Vt i ,y d N t - ,1 0 14. COPYRI'OHTS/PATENTS CONTRACTOR shall not apply for a patent or copyright on ; <any":item, or tmateri&l produced as�a result of this Agreement, as _i " set forth in, 41n CFR 1-9.1.1 v i 15�t CITY. EMPLOI-DES". AND :,OrFICIALS &I v, n c a CONTRACTOR shall. employ, no CITY official nor apy .regular CITY .;erizplt�yee� in the work per'formed'pursuaa�t to."this nab Agregpwl . fl No. officer,_,or employee of CITY shall hav , any" financial xntere8t in this Agreement —in "violation of California Go vdrnmefit .Code' . . 1090, et sect. a `16.NOTICB , An notices o special instructions required to be f = given in ,.-iiting.;undOr this Ag?-eemez t shall .be~given either "by personal d'e1il�ery t`o CONTRACTOR'S agent (as `dp ignated in Section 1. hexteinabU e) or to CITY'S Director of =Public Works;,_ a8 ' - the situati.of� hall Warrant, or; by enclosing the same"in a sealed 'envel'ope,!; postage p:repasd,and� depaaiting the same in the _ IIt�ted States'' Postal 5+arvice.t` addressed as follows: TO ;CITY t '� _ TO CONSULTANT: � 'Pa l Cook ,; Jan Dell , and AssociatC4s, Inc.' R: Director of Publ` o Works„ 178�,91 Cartwright Road City of2Runtington Beach Irvine, CA 92714, 2000,Ma n Sttoe`t o. Huntington Beach, CA 92648` IL- rr`. r l I '777 VZi rN • ( ] f 0' • o. ar. o !4 5 C) 61 t� kj' ' ' I • A ., 2000 MAIN at'REE'P c IC )ANIA 92646 Paul E.°Cooky. Pubic `epartment �Directeir April 10, 1986 - %14 ' 36 j oO ° ASL CansUltirxj'Engineers f c l2cl Eas?i Warner, Avenue 1 Santa Ants; ,CA' 32-105'' - �s s Sublet~ ; Assessment istrict, Feasibility Study The City of Huntington Beach is in the process o a "significant downtown „'revitalization -program. DeXaioprnent agreements for the construction of a,pierside, c , °village retail area and'a hotel on Paciflc'`Coast: Highway neF% fAaakh;Street-hove •beep s r approved by the,,Q ty 06LAcil. The City is presentiy,�pursu►r;g design of a 1,000 to 1,200 s, ace parking structure to:,serve these developments.- ' In addition�tio the parking structure now in preliminary;;design, the City hasYidentif ed � need for up to�threc additicnalZ,parking stnietures:in the down town araa ,qhicy� would s� accomriiiidate 400 to 600 vehicles. The City would like to investigate the passibility of ietilizing assessmert district financing for the desigrk and coristr�ac4rion the three futurenl p-arki!ng sir cture ' ;. WPe are presently, soliciting proposals for t te:.study of tine, assetsment district financ ng method fon:khe future parking structures. �71'he ar cipatdd study should4nclude, as a minimums ` i. A,survey of the -uswof assessment district financing for the puroose of financing parking,cnstrisctures in tuations similar to:the Huntington beech Downtown, Reddi4elopent area. The surveyshoulri' include, an a+aalysis of the success or failure �o of}�eassassrhent districts. ° 2 Arp�limi any naly� s of zone of benefit and assa§sment spread withlnfkl•ie zone tba"d on the proposed tiire and location of<:the pa'r►king structures an&the uses permitted by, the Dqwntown Specif16 plan. 3. Prepar'tign and>prese rat�oit;,of the analysis described abovQ to affected prierty �r7. awn rs and interested Citizens. ... ,.. 'tom - /fU ��� _`• a i U o Assessma,,ht DiAricto , 4.11 An valuiitlon of the,practicality 0 financing Ithe proposed arkin structures b p �° � p Po P 9 y �s`s o sssessinent distici: flnancI! V. ,•r x 5.° 'tMethods fjr making the`lassessment filstiict method of financing more feasible. Proposals for this feasibility study are to be submitted to my attention by May%7, gS6 with the rootation "A8sessmen t Feasibility ,tudy" on the envelope. Each proposal should , 'inefluden as aAeoowing tems h ` A statement of'the cansuRant's understanding ofthe scope of work.- a � � 2 The mtjth6dolo6y the consultant proposes to fulfill the study requirements. 3a `iise ex�eerieeice"of the firm, and the individual preparing the,study,'in the preparation' of sievilar.,assessmenC districts. This statement should include a brief description of tt� project, the client agency, a contact person,,at the client agency, and the success _. or. faii' a ,of the distiictz '° 4• An "tinnate: of time required to prepare the study. 5. Thy .estima6d fee to complete the'study based on a time and materials billing, with a Q net exet�ed total fee• J 6 ,4n instirae�ce accord forni'listir`! I Genera! Liability, Professional Liability (Errors s& O'nission) and Workers Compensation coverage. After the receipt'of proposals, a03 idahts will be screened relevant to: ;1. Expertise' 'and W perieesce. • 2. The-e athodology tp'be used as outlined in'th -,proposal. h s `4,3. ` l�biiiiy tab comple ct�e project in a time ly and onsist � "QP r� .46- k Fees. ` 5. ,, Abillty'ito proYade General Liability, Professional Liability and Workers Compensation coverage. = ' J C� Q5 N i ., (4. }y11 t1� � a r . C�� zn _r-', c �.� to t1 P`1gm6ment Drstrlct r F ity 5Wdy Certain cro�*sultar�ts maybe interviewed pn; t icoIhe final selection. Enclosed for ikn)lquestionsor t your lr&rmeiloi ise,sample..:egtractforthis;stody�t,oShould you have `f:rsis a� ,.' 'c€�er s regarding etody plegae telephoner �r�'.;?(71�)5:36 543p. ``� - Very Truly YGurs, rd � 7 Les G. Evans V ! ,?` City Engineer _ lam! - Encl. °Sample Cantiact u _ 4 ✓�„ ac Sieve Kohler, Senior Comsr unity•,Developtrient Specialist . a Petal Coale, D metcir of,Public Works a r t t 0592g k,y } , } O OL (rviri't CalJoAc 92714 t 714/474-1400 �E}:HIM-1T, 117A ay I4Yr o:Des,. G, Evans City Engineer'" - ` City of Huntington Beach 4 2flOQ ,Main Strut Huntington Beach; California ' 92648 tASSESSMENT DIS=._ 1 FF.ASIBILITY STUDY" c ' Dear Mr. Evans 2 Vari&D411 and Associates, Inc. (VA) is pleased to present this f(proposal to,pe,rtorm a parking structure Assessment District' ' Eeas 3ai Pity study. %We have reviewed the City` s''REP and visited the potential sues and surrounding area. We believe we know %chat' `the City needs for this study and feel *we can best provide ' for' thoC.needs. We have assembledfa team of -experts in assessment district foraiulataon and assessment sgread;ing for _this project. Not only. � :do these individuals- have the necessary technical 'backgrour:d, but �+ they are "also faa iliac with the City of Huntington BeachDo Specific PlanTzind the Downtown Parking, Transit, and Financing Study. As sdr _-h; they are sensiti vie to future benefits which ;t could be de, ivied fro: they parking structure (s) ,, as well as the 1` F �iitical Ological.'and financial issueslinvolved. - • - VA has an: established reputation ;for highuali.ty work with the City of Huntington Beach. We'planned and designed improvements .for Koled Lane, 1984 redevelopment<-roj'ect. We encourage you o' conaG!t our assessment district -,related reference for further confirmation o `\u reliability. �i ; We thank 'you fa i the opportun Lty` to propose on this project and trust that the at��ache ' nformat .on is complete.--,- Should you have any c zest ons or needi,, further information, please feel free to contact us Very truly yours,- J VAN. DELL -AND A SQCIATES, INC. \{ n J. Van Dell, P.E. ;r .Resident r JEV rMLM :a►a � J - y 4 oil 0 p . BTIvD Tl 1I9II�TG, QE PROJECT °- n �7e11 and,) Associates, Inc. understands that the C 1'V of Huntingtoni Beach desires to, construct three parking structures •to serve the coaercial "Core" area along Main Street. _These structures -will be r-v- 3dition to a px,;oposed,,'parking structure near the pier to serve. the ret,ail/hotel complex proposed. 61 v� Seasonal beach. Parking"" is to be provided by parking lots east of ` ,., ., the pier .and through ;Ilshattle service, from outlying parking areas _ Vinancing' method. available -to the City to construct these facilities} include; among<'qther sources, the creation of an assess n ent "district . G The purpose o f7 the proposed `Feasibility, Stuidy is to .evaliiate this method of financing by developing 4assessment concepts and estimated*�costs for each i pa n the District. -. r.The.proposed sLoae of work to��c?�mplete the .,turfy has been , preseAed yin the following .seAlon of our proposal, , Methodology\ i a ' „ ,✓ 0 - tJ P i i _ 1r t E l� i oar .\.✓+ r���J ' c meL �d 4a ., i+ )- v �3 o . ;r t Our, ethod&16 is presented in detail in the followring section: They following outlines this scope: and includeslr a detailed, i-sting. of proposed roork -tasks, methodology, and comments; l (c�iry x�st%% As ey: en Distizict Fj 1ia Linn 4 ... ,This task will canvas Cities by telephone within the- general ' Southern -"C'alifor"nie. area to; de:termine.. if an Assessment District has been used or attempted to construct parking struictures' s*nilar `to those proposed in,.Huntington"Beach. " If so, a gyaestionnaire unde' r City "of Huntington Beach 1etterh6ad will beNsent :regr±esti.ng such information as type " r of .Assessment District,/Bonding"Act used, date or, 3.str::tt formation or public hearing, basis of assessment zones and c�`S s ° spread, Y ty�✓ .cal project costs , and.,,assessments., and forms and number of""rotest and con^.Cairns K.nowiedgable„indiyiduals GI e identified far future reference. Incomplete or J miss %xg nfo .,,nation wi,I.l b i followed up by telephone or if r convenient by yisiti. o se`proposed Feasibility Study will tabulate the information !1 received and identify any conclusions available. ; 2. Analysis of A_ ment Acts,ts. Ben2. egit one s and _ � s._ x ' Several alternat,' assessment proceedings are available to F: finance the proppsed facilities, including the Improvement Act of 19ll- Municipal Improvement .Act of;-1.913,: the Vehicle i Parking;Distriet Law of 1943, and the Mello -Roos Community Pa6ilities Act of `1982. , 'Though the details of the 1, c"proceedings differ, the Districts 61.1 ident"fy parcels of land 'benefiting from the facilities and establish - assessments based on the level of benefit received. p 4� C11 The first task into ideni1r those parcel s which will F �7 9benefit fro*``the pr-6posed improvements.. These parcels will &)fine the, tentative boundaries of flip proposed Assessment" _ District The '"Technical-No, 1-: Parking Facility r Locations" ��y rarso�nsrinckerhof wade andi', Douglas i c. , . Revised August, 1985 has identified the usage of the ' structures as "mainly ssrving office and commercial uses . " of ; ,-. ; E' (p13) "from the commercial land uses along Main Street" t (p14) These„ parcels' will form the nucleus of the District. ` an& they perceived'need of additional parking for these a �. parcels will determine the success of theproject. `0nce'� -he boii� dary of the District has been tentatively ' : mining ail parcels benefiting fron the idenced af contas improveme:ztla, tthe relative benefit. -of each parcel must, be ` determined. No specific, guideline's, other than "equitable, = benefit",: are� Available to essist in the development of 01 o these assessments.". This allows the` Dstrict`to be `tailored tp the needs and. perceived benefitst o�f the individual`, District. klthoug4 detail's District' opeed`angs of other p and., 'or benefit' spandreed formulas will be of interest andlend creel bil' ty 'to ,.this project, the final" decision one ---the project frill b� determ.ined by :the willingness of the parcel _ 1 o : ownek^*� to accept the benefit sprE:ad concepts cif this ySeveral particular Di Strict. details which might be ! considered in developing the assessment spread are: c 'a) differences or, similarities in, -the proposed, parking { structures, i cluding size, access, co dt , land } acquisitio,{%`special construction features, etc. E b) differences or similarities in the,parcels of ?-and benefiting from'the facilities, including existing land ' use, proposed land use., size, location, building limits Yr or restr-..ictioxns, etc... ; c) differences or,similarities in the relationship 'of' the lane„to the parking facilities, including distance, ` ° visib ll3ty, et�8 „ ;.NM IIE S-4,:0 E') C7. , i•� ir' a.r X-1� 0 fThe benefits received by any parcel is a comb nation of the ,- --above above and other factors ''�Conceivably�=there are as many, Qti assessment subzones as there are parcels. However, every effort needs `to bel made to standardize ,the assessment, concepts to the most important an�3 to discount minor r' differenccFs of each parcel and rch assessment. An understandable and rationale basis for the assessmen-L-s will rontnibute greatly to the success of the District �.y The Feasibility Study proposed ,will discuss the varioW;V � assessment proceedings availattle with a recummend'altion for prceedure based ,on . discussion 'aFi thi C_i.ty star and a �revie:w j' a r of-Ee Task 3 Survey. The study will establish a sched'ale of-ke `p" yoints inthe Assessment District proceedings, i= !?. - - - identify the recommended zones of benefit, and list all ,j sa parcels within '�fie.District with proposed assessment amoulnts . The assessments, will be brz,sed on plan.; ng estimates -of improvement costs anal estimates of incidental expenses. Alternative assessment _concepts grill be discussed with a}narrat?ve`"o'f'the impacts anticipated on the parcel assessments:.,o a 3 3. Jpr-p ent3ti on 4f the gib; ? S dy s q t, The Feasibility Study wil�l be presented to City staff for v review and comment. The City, with, assistance by the Consultant, will then present they?study, in an open informat;bnal workshop forum. Letters indicating the nature of the M�.,stri.ct and advising of the. informational workshops ,j will be sent, to eacli property owner.. Address labels or :. o 'window inserts for each property owner, including the parcel J nuihber'' and estimated assessment, -Kill be provided to the City assist in the mailings. Comments will.be'solicited at the workshop and reviewed to make the District`.-eflect an equita'ale,benefit to. all parcels. The final'eeasibility Study will be •available for, a formal presentation to the City Council. _ 11 S"1 a r iff t e 1 ^ ` '• District Finm=jng, .. � 12 The, outcome of" the .workshop and the ,presentation of the final Feasibility, Study will indicate the practicality of continuing with the formation.,.of an Assessment District. l i, One positive indication would be a petition to the City Council by the parcels in the proposed District requesting - that the District be formed. Additionally, if 607 of the area so petitions the. Council, the 1931."Debt Limit".;Act' - proceedings could be waived.�� Van. Dell and Associates, Inc: is 'highly qualified tv� cons6inue with the assessment engineering required to form thel assessment district, however, no�;'uch worn effort has r been.huded in this proposal. • ram. t� 5. M <fi i �fi : �aaib t l i i'tr Several methods could make the District more feasible, , ` 'J:t n uding reductions in construction; costs and, � D "Sportionately in, assessments; 'reducing incidental costs ? j . ., r (ch` as land acquisition, bond reserve fLinds , etc.; `aa�di;ng- the parcels benefiting from the -District resulting r' -r `In ,lower costs per parcel; or decreasing the cost to) 7lassessment by contributions from the City. These concepts vri.11 be detailed and the impact on the proposed assessments in°the final Feasibility Report. lf r ., -h ILI MOM rk an "�,"'� t U • - r . - ffi �e�• �01 � g • � A; � 1 7� by 8 �d Project: HBQH.PJ ^7� <„ —86 Jul Jul Jul,,Aug Aug " Aug tT5 i 20 27 03 i Q 17 r( , sm \J o� �hf a SS G VAN DELL AND ASSOQIATES, (NC. " _ c 77 A i �h 61 V w Uto `Val <.Z?ell aid `.Aspo'ciates proposes perfor*,'the ieasibl Z ty and saucy' ,.fox^ a'total of $9,533.00, br�icera. ., dawn as fo]lows: ' Study Ir*est1gati6n and-'Analysi-� $2,078 00 e Assessment ' , t Spreading A3ytei=natives: $2854;>0`Q Final` � Report and presentation-: !3. 735 60 . ;: tubtotal:: $8,'667.00 "! 10% Contingency 866.00 } 'XOTAL $ 9, 533 , 0 0 ' 1 r. rr r U U _ j ,r y y ` u t� .. aN n t o ' � - 1. n �+ r � � � , � ..o� � ` ['_� a °•,-^-„ 0 a Dprfdcate of insuram, TrII CERTIFICATE I:t)SSIt�D A$ -A MATTER OF 10%1MATION ONLY AC40 CONFERS No R.("TS UPON THE CEFTI�i¢ r tfITtLLER z.' # Tf11ERTIFICA�,E ODES NOT AMEND, EXTEND GJA AL j ER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BYriFtE POS.ICIES LISTED [sd%1.,'AfinY 6fifnFGS [YK Af+'.FN[ >•. . J ' �, - � / ,� - l Jf /I fl � [� - _ _ n U 1, ASSUCVMON 7D -01 i�I5T� Al"0 S, �: GOARP:AMC$ AFFQ DJNG COVAIAGES $y('�I"" �—�, r P ,C[1Rta UL TANT�S, INC - 1 ' try� �; t'�❑'% CDOX.,"S J! Q` - LETTER 0� c ,. IAlE CA 9u.713 F•� C01 PAY n LETTER � ..FG�✓'�3". .`,i A���-» - --- cngwEAN tDtEPw{7P INSyRCu y �s_ uC� coMVArvY t tEtTER' CETT �Vti2 DELL AND ASSOCIATES, , 78'01,�' CA�RTl�rU HT' -HE H�tRTIFORD ti �.)a� �" o �''.'f -9714 I' Cbh1PANy -- _ �, LE[ �ER �ibi5ls'! 5er�ifjrthattplictesofinsu[ancellstedbetcw have been issue[±f!othe insured �%Medabo%k`Pr the Fdi[;ylSzriodlndtopted.Notwithstanding any requirement, talnorcond0ionoftiny -eLn.UFbit72sdQr;Urnsntwith respect towhich ttlac6titicaternayb-,bsuedomayPortain, the insurance afforded by -the poligiesdeccnbedher mt Isrubiecttoall the trrm3,.extlurlch%ba,l ' - _raRlidtf.oicors.:chPottctt yCbMPl YY LETTER ( TYPEO0AIBU INCE. }+ '� , i, �, �� POLICY NUMBER' ,S - .�� '. — _ a. - PO'IDY �, +>=7(p13ATICtiAYS .'. " . Litnifs� !tabu" W InThosizan s( t EACH ^OCCORRENCE Au1.iRE0ATE n A fsEt1a itAL)1IAS[GlTaa* ry t. 1;. t q tlgnrar a.auav $ 3 eP 'CpM1'REHEH514-E FORK s ` pFlF,f�il 'S-C1REiiAYlON5+-,� �" �EXPLO5IUN.4N0 -'! q t � Pmdd ERYYDAMAGt= b X � �.. �DLi,4PSr,5 _ C UNDERGROUND.HazAe' ' PR�}OCYS/GQMJ'LETED O,P ATION5 HAZARD r f GQ 1`RAL"1$AL INSLRX.NC6,, ao17LY INJURY ArJD ,PRO EIUYOAMA%.F -ck!r 6ROAO f08MPFf0P1R7Y DAMAGE COMBlWftl ' INDEPENDENTCONTRACionS ,0 {{ (i U PERSDNA'C INJURY ! :.Pt0VALRY UADILITY q, BODILY INJURY,:$ - " O�AUTOMOBILE SAMPREtiENSN'�"r`bRM v _ IEACel PER$DNI - 8001LY INdI!H Y ` i0'1[NE13 .` '� (EACH OCCURRENCEI _4 HtRCp - PHUPENTY BODILY INJ,iY AA ID PRO Pf: fITYVAMA E L, %MON:GWNED '� d 61 EXCESS LIA1316TY _ UIde11ELLA ORM �1 _ ._ DODR.Y INJURY ANR,� LOTHO THAN UMBRELLA } '} PROPER" t A PALL CUMUINLO ' FORM, [j- wORK9a!SC0MPENSATl6- 72WJ4029Q5W and 9f01 i87 rA7u�dRv . ..>�; Ti�ceF�i a an date 9/01f/86: EMPLOYEWS LIABILITY S ° 1. O'00Q (EACHti CUMENrt nn _. QESCRIpriON#;;P PkERATJOHB/tOCAT10NSrVGHICLEG� �' � °ALL ENGINEERING. lI � `� 00ERATIOi4[S 13 riTy 0cancellation: Shand an, of the above d0cribed �olicfes be .anlat l* before the expirafiop elate thereof, the issi ing Gomp4n _ will, eaa tes.#a mail - days written notice to 1ho belownamed�&Iificate holder, . suzdilelt im as 10 Of L`Sld up tile COtnOany, itI agents or rej3re;> taty5' RAMS AND ADOflE Ok,CERT#-lCATE HOCDER °�' CITY Y OF-BEACH na c f,ic. /y! 14 0n - m..,..-«.�-..r y, - TE' 4U: i.f f� -HUNTINGTON 4 ATTN DON NOBLE CONTR ADMINIST 200 M41N `S,Y =PUBLIC ,WORKS DEFT 1 bIUAtTTN`��TOW BEACH CA 92648 ,LINDAo BURTON fu4�r[;�+z Ars Hrr mop tZ13i 029.3555 11', , -° 0'i f a1 b t t-rye _ 1 V ' •-a ,0 " 4 c '�,Y /PK,i;�. t. fir• • h it{S'k•. 0 d e'HE= HARTFORD Maned, Insured' °Van Dell and' Associates Inc Pol 72WJgO2995W ,,,.,Jht� . e6dcrsement for,%s - a part of the policy as numbered abover issued by THE HARTFORD/) INSUR^,N`Cf� GROUP company-, desiSn.a•ted� thereina and ,takes.effect as of\,the, effective date of s..=,id Policy ph'iess°another effective `sate is stated herein. °Effective date: `9/01/86 "-Effective hour is, -the same as enS144te'd ' :n 'ihe Declarations of the p6 iey. 410DITIONAL INSUPD EMPLOYER ENDORSEMENT nA , ,I�T fS �AG.RUD THAT SUC.H� INSURANCE AS IS AFFORDED BY - THE POLICY LND.eR INSURING AGREEMENT f ALSO _APPLIES `ro. CITY 011 ,-HUNTINGTON. BEACH► ITS .�OFFTCERS AND EMPLOYEES 200 iai Sr€�et Huntington eachy Cal iforrio 9269•9 I. R49CE IS PRIM"pRY \ cA$ AN ADDITIONAL (INSURED EM LOYER BUT ONLY AS RESPE,CT9j,EMPLOYEE8 HIRED 'BY AND CARRIED ON THE PAYROLL OF THE EMPLOYER NAMED IN: ITEH I OF THE DECLARATION OF THIS POLICY. , 7 a AAC jmd ISSUE: 8/27/86` G. Autho-rized Agent Nothing herein contained shall be held to vary_. waiver .alter or extend any of the terms► conditions► agreements or ,declarations n of ;the policy other[, than as herein stated." n. This endorsement shall,: not be binding unless countersigned by a,, duly authorised agent of the company+ provided 'that' if this _. endorsement takes effect as of the effective date of said policy and_► a't' issue= of ,;said policy► forms a part thereofa; countersignature on the dec-larations Page of said Policy.,by a' dUly' autfoorized went of the company shall constitute valid counter signatjare, oft this' endorsement � Form 9-22,40-38 rKZ1ay41,41� PV- uwrn...iuwr.r...�r.riwotn •,`:••:•••,•,••.•.•- due'1z re.'ti"rs".sxaa�...:.—_.Y,- xre+.v�d.K=ra.i.+.e.I.a,:,ew;,a.mduNEtbsxaNxrzi,.dint-iww_41y...:Y`::`:�;7Pt:�`ui:_, %.1��4•. .,tM�.i�P cw >NAME AND. ADDRESS OF AGrWCY ' ASSOCIATION AMASMA7CRS COMPANIES A�O�NG COVERAGES J 2900®C naCA sUk,!NlSuiTE 5®0 COMPANY A = COMMERCIAL UNION :, TIMw 04'9 8334673" _ _LIFT eR" B HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY NAIRE AND AODR.SS OF INSURED- : °E;,EANY �s`'' CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY VAN °DELL -AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 17801 CartWrlgP'rt Road "N,)!�� LETTER"Y'� Irvine; California 92714`` -- �� COMPANY - LETTER < ! Thisistocertifythatpoliriesofinsurance)Ws ti below have been issued to theinsured named abo'te and are IrMorce atthis time. Notwithstandingg'anyrequirement, term or condition ? of airy cmdract or other document withiespect to which this certificate maybe issued or may pertain, the i4surance afforded by the policies described herein 13 sut:ject to all th3 teaats. exclusions and conditions of such policies. caMPANY ~ oucv 1innits of Liability in Thousand (�) t.ETTFR „ ;, TYPEOF INSURANCE ,�. POLICY NUMBER FJ(PIRAYION DATE EACH AGGREGATE _ OCCURRENCE GENERAL LIABILITY I FOOILY'INJURY �:. $ $ cn COMPREHENSIVE FORM �RP�1P�lal of NA97�740Z0� - 4/1/87 IY @1PREMISES—OPERAT1,64S i.;I - _ PROPERTY DAMAGE S b ' _EXPLOSION AND COLC�PSE,` '• HAZARD UNDERGROUND 4AZARD { - PRODUCTS/COMPLETED CONTRNJU.Fnr AND ACTUAL If•' URANCE' - RATIONS HAZARD// list Cy�y �� -rlc•r FRO EBODILYRTY DAMAGE -: 1;S t �, to.. 500 s 500 FiOOM .PE OPERTY ;� �gO TO�, �y I� ' COMBINED INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORSA� I 'De4 PERSONAL INJURY' _ •g�, PERSONAL,INJURS, S - 500 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BODILY'INJURY ., U CA ,(EACHPERSON) 5 A COMPREHENSIVE FORM a.CAE0364B23 5/4/8/ BODILY INJURY s, f OWNLD' (EACH ACCIDENT) j 1 PROPERTY DAMAGE_ Su HIRED BUiALY INJURY A(JD NON -OWNED ' .PROPERTY DAMAGE $o 500 COMBINED EXCESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FORK t✓✓ BODILY INJURY'AND N A� Rene °al of f A0309048' 5/4/87 PROPERTY DAMAGE c $ 15000 b 1,000 OTH&THAN UMBRELLA t COMBIN D„ FORM ;a WORKERS' COMPENSATION srATuroeY B and 72WJ402995; 9/l /86 EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY 1c,000 (UCH ACCIDENT) OTHER " FROFESSIONL AAE301.5203 5/18/87 $1$00 7imi'tf liability_�,er C, LIABLLITY claim and in aggregate SGRIPTION OF OPERATIONS(taCATIONSNEHICLES� J1 C: Cancellation: Should any of the above dascribed policies be cancelled befora the expiration date ;hereof, the issuing com- pany will xxot xX'Xix mail; _ days written notice to the below named certificate holder, btXlXM)4M)b x' �WChZ;Xrlib(3Q7��4�(9(7Q)WthQ6tD9i0R�tB(4(�kDt�tDOX4XX)t�kC�jODC4d�CP14i(lXpG3l��fJ2iCi4k3�7620�C. NAN5A.ND ADDRESS OFCERTIFICATE HOLDERk1 � DATE ISSUED! 5 21/86 b CITY OF HUNTYNGTON BEACH 1 ' _4 o Att D'on NobTe, Contract Administrato.=-�� 07 'Public Works Depalrtmen 200 Main Street AUTHORIZEO.NEPRESENTATIVE 6� �" Hu,tfn ton'Beach California 92648 ♦ DDRD 2.5 (1.79) c p 1 SSG �fAsi � t =.D y1IlVisr ► c�ixS & COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGES C-0,NsUITANTsr Nc. f 1q0 '.,0,M4 i'i.°.�f iUR AIM, SUR 500 COMPANY A COWERCIAL. UNION .. IMANIE, iA 9271 ,. . ". 9L- I�14,833-067 COMPANY HARTFORD ACCIDENT & gt�DEi�ll'i`Y: LETTER . NAME AND ADDRESS OFINSURED co"NY C CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY VM DELL -AND ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTFR �pgi y j :. �1 a 801 Cae.bw' / ght. Roads Irvine, tali.fornia 92714 . LETTERNY r r COMPANY �.. . LETTER TNs isto certify that policies of Insurance listed below have been issued to the insured named above and are in force at this time. Notwithstanding anyreeqquirement,term orcond&mn 4any contract or other document with respect to which this certificate may he issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the policies descrltied herein is subiect to afl the teens :ezclusfons and conditions of such policies. '- Limits of Liability In Thousands j coluPANy° LETTER - TYPE OFINSURANCE _ POLICY NUMBER POLICY -EXPIRATION DATE EACH OCCURPENCE , AGGREGATE y GENERAL LIABILITY fA L AI Q COMPFiEHENSNF.� ORM �tglft-79p 1 Renewal of NA9 1`P020 .psi 'T�1�IP.� BODILY INJURY $ $ Cam, PREMISES -OPERATIONS PROPERTYDAMAGE E '$ 1, EXPLOSION AND :COLLAPSE T�I HAZARD l.J UNDERGROUND HAZARD 1 PRODUCTS/COMPLMED f �� \� OPERATIONS HAZARD CONTRACTUAL INSURANCE La < A,•` . 80DILY INJURY AND DAMAGE O PROPERTY 50O . .: BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE A'PR 1�IS .., ".` COMBINED - - INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS (Xa+ 1< PERSONAL INJURY _. �.•- PERSONAL INJURY $ 500 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 30DILYINJURY $ J _ (EACH: PERSON) A COMPREHEIj'�,.JE FORM- CAE0364323 5/4/8.I BODILY INJURY $ _OWNED ✓ - `.. (EACH ACCIDENT) PROPERDAMAGE TY $ . HIRED - -. _BODILY INJU"'� "� PROPERTY DAMAGE $'".:500 ., C . NON -OWNED .. COMBINED EXCESS LIABILITY .. ,'J �% "Renewal � BODILY fNJURYAND ' UMBi�_';A FORM y r� q_ of CAD309048 C pq 5/4/8 PRDPERT'I DAMAGE ry- p $ 11000 q q" �a1 s003i OTHERTHANUMBrrELLA COMBINED FORM WORKERS' COMPIENSATIOId STATUTORY R and `' 72WJ402995L. 9/1/'06 EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY $ 1 OOO j (I:ACN'J1CLiDE141'), OTHER PROFESSIONAL AAE301,520.3 5/18/87 $1,000 limit of liability per LIABILITY claim and in aggregate DESCRIPTION OF GPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES Cancellation: Shc�ild 2ny of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date theraof, the issuing com- pany will email _30-- days written notice to the below named certificate hold' , bW)6ft" fix• DATE ISSUr,D:_ - 5.121186 11� C/ AUTHORIZEO'.REPn^ESCNTAT14E. .,n ., Wr G.d`- c• n �� '�0 41 pallry,) a At' blos clause need be campiettonly when this erdorsemert Is Issued subsequent to pre aration of the p y I `"M 20 09 (Ed. 01 73) L 9452 G116 (Ed.]-73) - : IJO G111i ADDITIONAL INSURED Owners or .Contyactots U ?his endorsement madiffey;such insurance as is afforded by the provisions of the policy relating, to the following: ! ' a COtdFAENENSIYE GENERAL VABIEITY ICSURANCE MANUBkCTURERSAND CONTRACTORS' LIABILITY, INSURANC► Q This endorsement, effective 5/4/85 , forms apart of policy, No. NA F 43`r00 77 „1 (12=ot A. r6., standard tone) Issued to 'ran D!�14, and: Assoc'�ates, Inc. by " The' Northern Assurance Company of A a It _ uthorim Representative Schedule �, l Name of pliton eraflrcanizatlon r _ t (Addiliond Insured) location of Covered Operations CITY' OF'flUNTINGTOR BEACH, It's elected and 'appointed boards, officers, agents "and employees. S PRIMARY INSURANCE' I v Premium Basis, Rates Advance Premium ` Bodily Injury Liability Cost' $100 of cost S 35.00 PiopertylVanage Liability Cost $100 of cost $ incl ' Total Advance Premium $ 35.00 ., t is, agroad th ' aJ _ d. The "Persons Insured" provision, is amended to include as an insured the person or organization named above (hereinafter called "additional insured"), ) but only with respect tl' 9iabilily arising out of (1) operations performed for the additional insured by the named Insured at„the location designated above or (2) acts or omissious'of the addhWal insured in connection with his general supervision of such operations. 2, None of the exclusions of the policy, exc pt exclusions (a), (c), W. (g), (i), (j) and (m), apply to this insurance. -. 3. Additionii!'Exclusions This insurance does not apply; f ) (a) to bodily Injury or property damage occurring after (1) all walk on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured at the site of the i covered operations has been completed or (2) that portion of the named Insured's work out of which theSnjury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization I olher than another contractor or. -subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project, " (b) to bodily injury or property damage arising out of any act or omission of the additional insured or any of his employees, other than general supervision of work performed for the additional insured by the named insured; (c) to property damage to �� ; (1) property owned or,pccupied by or traced to the additional insured, 1 (2) properly used by the additional insured, (3) property in the care, custody or control of the additional insured or as to which the additional insured is for any purpose exercising physical control, or, ; b workpe&tmed for the additional insured ti' `the game insured. ! 4. Additional Definillon When used in reference to this,insu►ance, "work" includes materials, parts and equipment furnished in connection therewith: � •� A�7HEt�,TfC� c� v !; � ss.s-awe.xrx.r..yiK�n v.�t.�".�wEmX.tb4:a�vdr F3�' •s..e"X,,, k:Nn` tint. �-!�: .. � _. Y a 5%4/'86 CAE 0364323 p, I This endorsemcnt,effcctcve , forms part of Policy N--, -VAN DELL AND ASS,PCIATES, INN issuefLAO-o z �by the insurance company indicated below by"an "X". - CLIk}MtatCIAl. UNION „� .. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'1'' THE EMPLOYERS" FIRE - IISt RtANCE COMPANY +; ❑ INSURANCE COMPANY ❑ INSUPANCE-COMPANY .THE NORTHERN ASSURANCE ❑ COMPANY OF AMERICA \ "J ADDITIONAL INSbRED IT IS° AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD THAT THE FOLLOWING IS NAMED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED.WITH RESPECT TO THEIR INTEREST IN THE OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED• 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH It's elected and appointed boards, officers, agents and employees Insurance is°Primaryjmd : AJALC <> .ISSUE: 7/10/86. n ' C : a 1'0 , Fcri 1 .... _. • . ''. tisMdw»F'BaaS,Fi�mN�1.4frsltibiws'dW+C'4.� .. .. .• •," ,4tc+5'1 „