The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWILLDAN ASSOCIATES - 1982-02-16*Ut R D'CRO�EU INSDD��NCBAGG-N'CY 3151 Airway Avenue B3 p�� rr�R�.v�, k`/�� Costa Mesa, Cau"u,n.aU2526 (714)557'5234 Design professional Insurance Company B ' WILLBAN ASSOCIATES 290 S. Ana�,ei-i Blvd,. =IOO Anaheim, CA 92806 '1,000, A X �l,OUO, � PL 62Q4§4-�l 11-9'86 !I-�-S7 `l"OD0, �l1OUV" ` "Certificate mz7der is naried as additl"IB}nal . " -1 insured as resopcts [omnfrc`a7 6enera# ^ — - Liabi�it� on�v ^ ` T�e ag�regate lt,,s of l�abil�ty s�`wr nn 1.1iis certificate are p�,bject to rc�dv_-tion by pay -:en'- fmr lwss m' reiatec to ntner clai!ro, 4f any, node ~' tl)n same nolicy � period. —', A Prn,"essional PL 620494-ril 11-9-87 Sl."',00, each claim and in Liabi\ity t�ie ag�regate - ^ ^ "For Professional Liability coverage, the aggrcg7.ce is tne t3tal of insurance avaYluble for claims presented within the policy period for all operations rP the insured'" �.i.L `.�+.+.t•...."r ct�. �.G... f�' Zk,+r.�.`':, ,,�r '..>•�a�..�� {{;k`r,... 1i w•i;t.:a..> d� r .,�' -Oilug s v�a °s :. �` .a.X �.♦. `ter �`wa...� id' " v`ry.�se_ � i �. _ ., Ey �.�' _ CERTIFICATE l5 ISSUED A AS A M^ER pp INC�tA T13*, ONLY A\7D JDNIEPS R t T r.� i^ pt' ^ t' ' p' NO RIGH'S UPON THE CERTIFICATE H:)_DEF'. 'Hi5 ..Eer'"�IP1vA''E DOES r1D' AMEN.: y SLnA,` E Ate:,;CY .tC EXTEN,^, 7R A.TER THE COVERAGE A=ORDEC EF THE �0_1CIES BE.OW 'itiEiiTTIE ., CA?n5�'F3 c-_�•-��il� CCMPANIES AFFORDING COVER G B_HUNTINGIN v_UAPAN` C DEVELODYENT �rtt,ES hI& IS TO CERTIFR• > :T POJCIES OF INSJRANCE -IS'EC BE�O\A KAYE BEEN iSSJEO TC THE INSJPE NAME: AB: JA FDR THE PO_ „" "tRtO tNDtC.6'ED - NO'H^,?H.arTAHJ:Hu A ' REO:)IREMEN•T IERW OR C3NO"/Dh O- AN+" CONTRAC' OR O'HER 6O'UMEN W", RESI'EC' Tc WHIZ''-H!SAT BE )SSJEC OF MAY PERTA)N THE iNSJRAN7_E AF«ORDEL Ek' THE POJCIES DES3RIBEC HEREIN IS S SJEC' A__-wE'ERVS Exc_JSdONS. LN: COND+ 'iOKS LK SUCH Pa._)COES GENERAL JABI..;TY a .:• ._.„_.,,"fir,'. ._..,.,.,. .. ._....,�-..__.. ....... .. _ .. -. ... -... .. .. ., _ EX: ESS . ABi2. , WJRwEhS COMPENSATi:7-- AND EVa_OYERS ABI_7Y F r " ALL EPERA7 EONS OF THE "4-P_E- ltISL ANCE € SBEFI TS OFFICE PerF SHDU:C A.NY� OG TctE AES O!'E DES-R;Br PO..I: IES BE CAN^E,....EC BEFORE THE EX CITY AT70P.NEv 'S OFFICE PiRk T!"..?'.. DIL—E T\4t REOr 'NE 'SSLING Ni.: NttXXW4;A)tXt+ .y r\ y pr+A T MAI: ",} DAYS "'—Eh N:'I;E ' 'HE :EP'lc a;,L�E'-(D.OEF ItAMu TD 'HE C.+ l h S s .EFiA C4l'9EX X ��4KYk�it 'nx P 0 BOX, '"o :=a HIJN7: GTON SEA P , C A 912 EGE A, 5 :.. TfA.. Nov. 20, 1985 ii, ;: A i —'P' 'IF .11 ,a.;I i ".A' F R D. CROWELL INSURANCE AUENCY 3151 A,!vv:iv A�e%e 63 Costa Mesa Cal,;Ic—a 92626 —OMPAMES AFFOkOING CC' VERAGE t71A) 557-5234 T �r, i-�-,fessi,naliz Willian A;zio,. iates 'APB Anahem-,, Ca !9% X X X X A X X X In:luj, X Sz . ..... A Professional L'at'llitV t, i 'n a I ry, Rh; LiR f,- F,—-, trnzr n Ccnrral Park L\panswn "For Professional %—abtltiv coverjg", ftt' wj2rek: Itt- lwrit :.-; ft,,- Loral insuran, t' availatle for Jairns presented it irbin tl,e poli,:v period fcrr 'I'll "lleration, ;f '110 msure l.- Citv of Huntington Iloach P.0 Box 711 PAME� c 'VIE XXX& Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ATTN: Rislt Manag-?r 1A Richard D. Crolwell -w- 11 DESIGN POFESSIONALS INSURAVE t0k1l"ANY z P 0. DRAV&H DPFC NAG N' I E Y. CA 9 19,12 408; 649 5r,22 CERTIFICATE OF, INSURANCE THIS CERTIFICATE'S ISSUED AT THE REQUEST OF CIT,( OF HUNTI"iGTOI'i BEA&i P.0, BOX 711 hU%Ti'xGTC;*l BEACH, CA 92612, DATE ISSUED: 1983 ATRISK P,i� T S THE _POLICY ,INDICATED BELOW BY POLICY NUMEX& POLICY PERIOD A,.iD LIMITS OF LIABILITY HAS BEEN ISSU;O TO lk$SLlFtEO*S NAME AND ADDRESS WiI.-DAN ASSOCIATES 290 S. T ',1 5 S CA 92Z#c T YPE OF INSURANCE DATE POLICY NUMBER GSIONA141ABILITY 713 4 "4WPREHERSJVE GENEPAL LIABtl.ITY ... LXCLUDWG XUTOMOBILES) LIMITS OF LIABILITY DEDUCTIBI. L E A *::f P h -.,f .-,I. riSAk-f EACR 'R k 80 3 4 EA QAfh A A, A'f O! SCRJPT16.14OFOPERAMNS AND LOCATION TOWHICH "Ei"rIPICATE APPLIES NOTICE CAN FLLATICN .:ruin XXXXXXXXX- NO f"! :ao I'l:" SPECIAL PROVISIONS S 7 SP E 'T TC' 'Q!lt, Lii- I'SiVE I "i C, F 4 1 ,,, �t. Y._ I , t H�.'JT GENERAL L. I T;,B I' I & L T: Tr,.s 4,cale 0 isi;,44rce Is trett'% Il 1"Ill the co—pany Nvhing cor!atroci nore- s`Fv operalp 1, alf"! COSTA MLSA, CU PROS: LICER MD. CRLe'4ELL V;b[iRA4'X_E AGPICY t*,_;". IN, IIH:i NSURANCE COMPANY 151 A, T�,,4,jy AVV,'UE 8-3 LOCAIION St,',N0URF 01 AaT,4LAlEDREPPESENTAT,%f E0A(PRf.S0'AT:VE 0 0 CITE' OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 20O0 MAIN STREET OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK April 28, 1982 Willdan Associates 290 S. Anaheim Blvd., Suite 100 Anaheim, CA. 92805 CALIFORNIA 92648 The City Council at a regular meeting held Fehruary 16, 1932 approved an agreement with your firm for the preparation of an environmental impact report assessing the proposed master plan for Huntington Center Park. Enclosed is a duly executed copy of said agreement together with a copy of your insurance certificate. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:bt CC: Jim Paling Dev. Serv. Dir. Judy John, Finance Carolyn Strook, Rec, & Parks Rick Ainadri l , Purchasing (Talophw.e. 734.6X-62 I REQUES10FOR CITY COUNCIACTION Date February.15, 1982 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator(1,W// L V'ED B Prepared by. James W. Palin, Director of DevelcipmI eR:r6vVe iF_c e s .. ....... Subject, HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PARK E.I.R. . ....... ly Statement of Issus, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Soume, Alternative Actions, Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Pursuant to the `_"itv Counrills direction, a professional servicps contract has been prepared by the City P,ttorrney for execution tween `be environn,ental rc%,sult, nc, fir:, of Wildan and Assoc;.z 3 and the City of Hun,,,inq,on Beacn fn_r preparatior of an enviro an ta 1 impact report assessin,:; the pronosea raster -!an for Hurtinat Central Park. RECOMMENDAT ION: Approve attached contraf7tua1 fc�r execution between Wildar. and Associates and the 7.,ty of Funtin=-,tnn Beach. ANALYSIS: on Decerber 21, V?*31, the "ity 'ouncil arproved the expenditure of up to $22,9jG frorT the Central 1",irk At-quisittion, Fund, to engage the environmental canskilti_n" f1r: of for, nreparation of an environmental ipact reptrt on the F-"ntinrton Ventral Park master Plan. The City Attorney'.i office has p.,_,rareJ1 t1he attached pro- fessional services exo�-uti',r. betweer. the -i-ty and Wildan and Associates. FUNr,'NG SOURCE: Central Park Acquisition and Dove I Fund (A -count ALTERNAT.-VE ACTION: Not to approve execution of the coriract - this would delay imple- mentation of the park master plan and would expose the City to possible legal challenges for not meetinq the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. ATTACHMENTS: Professional Services Contract JWP:JRB:jlm PIO 4/V WILL®AN ASSOCI ES, 0 ENGINEERS, APCH11PTS &, PLANNERS AnCiFv�lm. �"cxrd�5 4snr,Yct '. •mt "];'a. � ]r upresry.N.� r:•,*� ",fir • �•Y; 7 �. ,.., April 6, 1982 Mr. James R. Barnes Associate Planner City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beech, California 92648 Dear Mr. Barnes: I am enclosing herewith a copy of the Certificate of Insurance, the original of which was mailed directly to the City Clerk under separate cover. Also enclosed is our first invoice requesting 35% payment (of the fixed fee) as provided by our contract. I would appreciate your efforts in transmitting this invoice with your approval for paymert to the appropriate department. The Administrative Draft will be delivered to your office on Friday as we previously arranged. Sincerely, WILL N ASSOCIATES,. , RY WcRN r�b`a7 P1 nni Services Director GW:kk E-401 P�144 Ar NG � CH Ar�� EPA- C Hurt;. 0. Ro Lion X 290 1745 ORANGEWOOD AVENUE 9 SUITE 2;) • ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92668 9 (714) 978-6185 • (213) 924, I ACREE:ME! 'C 1`o 11RE- ARE: AN ENY IRONMENIAL IMI'A(J R1:11ORT-- 111;N INlilt)^! CF1N1P,AL PARK EXPANSION THIS A6REEMFNT, made and entered into this 1!,..._...__-__ day of 1952 by and between the CITY OF HUNTIN6TON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter reterred to as CITY, and WILLDAN ASSO- CIATES, a California corporations, hereinaftet reterred to as CONSULTANT, R E C I T A L S: 1. The City Council of CVA is authorized to engage the services of a professional consultant fi-m for preparation of an initial study, draft, and final Environmental Impact Report on CITY's proposed expansion of the Huntington Central Park; and 2. It is necessary and desirable that professional services be per- formed for CI1"i as more specifically described in CONSULTANT's proposal, hereinafter referred to as PROPOSAL; 3. _he parties hereto desire to set forth their rights, duties, and liabilities in ounr '"6 the services to be performed under this agreement, NOW, THEREF)RF, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: SECTION 1. CITY EMPLOYMENT OF CONSULTANT'S SERVICES: CITY hereby employs CONSULTANT to t form the services as de.cribnd in CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL, attaci.ed '7ereto as Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" and incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Exhibit "A" is the PROPOSAL. Exhibit "B" is the. Payment Schedule. Exhibit "C" is the Addendum to the PROPOSAL. c ;TION 2. CONSULTANT'S PERFORMANCE: CO?t`SiILTANT agrrt:s to perform all proft-,sional services 3s!: ,crated with the areparati.rn (." an initial study, draft, and final FIR as mote specifically described in CONS1L'rANT'S PROPOSAL. SECTION 3. GENERAI. DESCRIPTION OF CORK TO dE DONE: A. CONSULTANT ehall prepare thtt draft acid Kinal EIR's in accordance with the California Pnblie Resources Code, Sect ons 21UJO to 21176, B. CONSULTANT s aall prepare an initial study in conjunction with CITY's staff to bz included its an appendix to the EIR. � �. .`",:" 1. 1.`.'.'rt Si-;a11 (srt3:'l.ti' <3 �lt't .il INI _.! at t';i:� fit gat tta• ese'tiCC 3}>I 1°. , o+ Ll'e proy Ct I:a acc,rdance with the CaIitor+aia Stcitt Ch'A t"eliJe- lines, C aiit ,rnia Administrative Code, TitIt• 14, 1 v, hot, 15141 t'a), th), ,and ",e). 1). C0NS113'AN'Ishal l provide a detai led statement settint; forth a thor•aut•,L description of tt,t- environmental setting of the project in ,accordance with Section I5142 of said Guidelines. E. Ci)NSVLTANT shall provide a detailed statement of the environmental impact of the proje,t In accordance with Section 15143 of said Guide— lines. F. CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed statement of the effects found not to be significant in accordance with Section 15143.5 of said Guidelines. G. CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed statement of the water quality aspects ro the project in conformance with Section 15145 of said Guidelines. H. Des riptioa of worn to be done is morn specifically described in CONS"LIANT` S PROPOSAL. SECTION 4. CITY'S OBLXATIONS: A. CI"1'`i shall provide CONSI=:.TANT with copies of relevant FIR's con— ducted to date. B. CITY shall pay a fixed fee? tep CC:NSUI.TANT in the s;um of S16,400 Sor professional. servie es rendered by CoNS17IJANT uneer thib agreement as set fora: in the Fee 5cht,dule In Exhibit "A" and payable in increments set forth in Exhibit "B 1, phis the: S•applemental Fee as se' forth in Exhlbtr "C" (Addeatdutr to 1°kt)P11SAI.). SECTION `a. CoNSI'1.17A.'iI''t uBLIGAr1;Q6: A. The 0S:1LTA,1T shall keep all intorm<ati:n as',d data slating to or connected with the t^,a,lttaAA doc•urwntq and the wark confidential in all respects and %lull not, without the prior written consent o f CITY, distributer or puhl'ofze any iaaf:trmation tv third persons. All data collected or special studies geperated as the result of this contract shall rEmain the property of CITY. B. CONSULTANT shall commence work on the Draft EIR at the signing of rhis Ontr ct- C CITY may extend tilt' tt.ae of completJ(m and!•'r any of tlhe doe d.atirs specified herein upon written matice to CONSULTANT. Without such written noLice, no extension of time Is vdlld. 1). CONSULTANT warrants accuracy of statements made in its reports, that its reports shall be bated upon data believed to be accurate and correct, and that its reports shall be prepared in a professional and expert manner. E. CONSULTANT shall submit monthly progress reports to CITY during the first week of each month. Included in each progress report shall be a summary of the work accomplished during the preceding month, an account of any significant problems encountered, and an esti- mated percent of work completion by task. P. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY invoices for payment in accordance with the Payment Schedule contained in Exhibit "B". CONSULTANT shall specify on said invoice the work completad in the time period. covered by said invoice, as reported by CONSULTANT in previously submitced progress reports for the same period. Upon invoice receipt and approval, but in x,v c�e!tt later tha--. forty- five (45) days after invoice receipt, CITY shall mrke payment thereon to -CONSULTANT. SECTION 6. NO FINANCIAL INTEREST: 5o offieial or employF}e of CITY has a fina-ieial interest in the subject matter of this af;reemeit contemplated within the provisions of California Government lode Sections 1090-1092; and SECTION 7. LABOR WDE: CuSSMANT waxr.ints that it shall pertorm the services herein contem- plated in c:orapiiance with the California law,, related to minimv..m hours and wages (California Labor Code 5e,ctisin .lil et. seq.), occupational health and safety (119 U.S.C. b51 et. seq. dnd the California Labor Code Section Fa"I(".j et. seq. ), and fair employment practices (29 t�.S•�. Section 2ul o-t seq. ,and California Lab4ir Code Section 1410 et. sec.) to the extent same are applicable heri!l n; and EIIS,t RI MINA"fltrT;: C0.N,S'I,TAkT agrees that in tt,t, portrrrm:rnce ut the terrns tit this Igre•t,- men t, it will not eny,,iige in, rl'.,C permit its anent,, to engapc- in, dis'" crtminartioer in employment of persons tiveauvt• of rave, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medle.l conditiun, marital staters, or sex of such persons, except as provided is Section 1420 of the California tabor Code. Violation of this provision may result in the imposition of penalties referred to in Di,rition 2, Part 7, Chapter I of the California Labor Co-,e. SECTION 9. iNDEMNIFECATION, DEFENSE, HOLD HARMLESS: CONSULTANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and save harm- less CITY, its officers, agents, and employees against loss, damage, or expense by reason of any suits, claims, demands, judgments and causes t.+f action caused by CONSULTANT, his employees, agents, or any subcon- tractor, arising out of, or in consequence of, CONSULTANT'S performance of this agreement; except where such loss, damage, or expense is caused solely by the wrongful acts of CITY, its agents, officers, or employees in connection, with the gerr-ral sulturvision or direction of the works to be performed under this agreement. SECTION 10. WORKEPS' Corm,'\. s,,.nON: CONSULTANT shall comply with all of the provisions of the Woikers' Com- pensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 a:t.a 5 of the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar States or Federal acts or laws applicably; and shill indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CITY from and against ali claims, dem;inds, p.ryrrvnts, suits, aa:tions, pro- ceedings, and judgments of every mature a;ad description, including attar-. ney's, fees and oasts, presented, brotegja or recovered against CITY, for or on account of any liability under arty of said acts which may be in- curred by reason of any work to be performed by CONSULTA':T under this agreement. SECTIUN 11. INSURANCE: CONSULTANT egrees to furnfi. to CITY and mrintain in force until ter- mination of this Agreement a general liability in -rrarrce policy in which u, CITY i5 named as an additional inr pared. 'i..e policy shall it<snre (ATY, its officers and employees, while acting within the scrape of tlwir dutie!, against all claims arisitig out of or in ;onection with the CONSULTANT'S negligent arts, err�.)rs, or oiissions pursuaot to this Agreement. The policy shall provide for not less than the following amounts: Combined single limit bodily injury andror property d.<mage of $300,000 per occur— rence. Such policy of insurance shall specif`_-.t lv provide that any other insura,nc led by CITY which may be applicable shall be deemed excess and CONSi. 'a insurance primary despite any conflicting provi— sions in CONSULV .t L policy to the contrary. SECTION 12� INDEPENDENT uONTRACTOP,: It is further understood and agreed �Iiat CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times as an Independent contractor herein and not as an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of income tax, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation, and , other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and employees, and all business licenses, if any, In connedion with the services, to be performed hereunder. SECTION 13. EXTRA WORK: A. In the event of authorization, in writing by CITY, of changes from the work as indicated in this Aireement or for other written permis— sfon authr)rizir,g addition. 1 work not contemplated herein, addltional compensation shall be allowed for su:h extra work but extra compen- satton shall not exceed It, percent of the total contract, as spect— f: ed abtsve, without apJ;10l, I of CITY. B. CoNSULTANT shall submit invoices which specify the ar:ra where work vas completed and the associated time for completion to CITY for approval. Work performt-J, at the regovst of CITY, n••tside the limit spec{fled in this agreement is to be designated as "EXTRA WORK" on invoices. Woik perfatmed in 4onnectlon with an authorizrI written caange order will be so designated on said i,ne ;. te. SECTION 14. SUBCONIRACTORS: This agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be dr egated to any l.erson or entity without the written consent of CITY. Sh,'TIi34 1 `,. TETNINAI`106 O zat;xl:F:PrF: T: CITY rest*rves the right to terminate, tierviL—s hereondar at aziv ti .,e wit' or without cause, and whether I not PROPOSAL has }aeeu fully rompleted by 3ii days written no ice to CONSitt.Tt..N1'. iipoii terminaation, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to compensation in proportion to the services per- formed to date of termination. Upon request, CONSULTANT" shall -ake a,ailable and turn over to CITY's possession all work done to date of termination relating to the proposal. SECTIr- 16. NOTICES: AA notices between the parties La this Agreement shall be in writing. f / IN I.iTNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto havc> caused this agreement to be executed by and through theft authorized ofticers the day, month, and year first above written. Willdan Associates, Inc. 1745 Orangewood Avenue, Suite 210 Orange, CA 92668 "CONSULTANT" WILI.DAN ASSOCIATES, INC. By f r. By Charles W. Roberts Vice President CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH s municipal corporation B �! t. l-11 fall Y Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 4 -L/-A City Clerk 700 7 2", _. City At r ey ; lr REVIEWED AND APPROVED: J INITIATED � D APPROVED: CS IX City Administr tom , o Planning Director J WILLDAN ASSOCIA# 4 I] 11 PROPOSAL to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report - Central Park Expansion City of Huntington Beach n November 1981 I fln U U' BtrttaING DEPT. ENVISTA, a division of Willdan Associates 17115 Orangewood Avenue Suite 210 Orange, California 8288 El E November 19, 1981 Department of Development Services City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box. 190 y Huntington Beach, California 92648 A 0!VG'GN OF Attention: Mr. Howard Zelefsky, Assistant Planner FiANNERS • E :" AERS • ARCW'EVS Subject: EIR 81 -5, Central Park Expansion Dear Mr. Zelefsky: It is with pleasure that Envista, a division of Willdan Associates, submits this pr-)posal for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report to assess the proposed expansion of Huntington Beach Central Park. We propose to prepare an initial study which will identify the specific issues of :oncern and the Envir- onmental Impact Repo.-t pursuant to the h. )visions of the California Environ- mental f ality Act. As a result of your staff's additional input and ciarification of the project, we will be investigating the following areas which are considered to be of signifi- cant concern to the City: 1) Population and Social Values --local citizens' groups may very likely react negatively to the proposed park expansion thereby constituting potential public controversy. 2) Lard Use and Planning. 3) Traffic ano Circulation. 4) HealLh, Safeh,r, and Noise. 5) Public Services ai-! Utilities. 6) Soils and Geolrgy. . 7) Hydrology. 8) Air Quality, 1745 ORANGEWOOD Alv'ENU SL.?E 210 ORANGE, CAUFG'�ti}A 92668 (714) 978.6185 Mr. Howar,a Zelefs,ky City of Huntington Beach November 19, 1981 Page 2 9) Biology. 10) Cost/Revenue. 11) Aesthetics. 12) Energy Considerations. ID 13) Project Alternatives. 1'1) Growth Inducement. The proposal contained in the following pages includes. 1) A brief summary of the project. 2) A description of the scope of work to be perfc 3) A work schedule identifying anticipated project ok ns. 9) A brief background of our firm including a listing of �4ilr clientele and select, client references. 5) A resume of the project principal and the staff members who will be responsible for preparing the specific sections of this document. G) A listing of associated consultants and resumes of those most likely to be utilized on this assignment. 7) A sunaration of our previous projects indicating our experience in the field. Our firm has an extensive background in the field of environmental studies, hav- ing previously prepared numerous environmental documents for clients engaged in both the public and private sectors, Willdan Associates is a member of the Orange County community with its headgtiarters located in Anaheim and this en- vironmental division of the company operating from offices in Oranne, California. im Mr. Howard Zelefsky City of Huntington Beach November 19, 1981 Page 3 As evidenced by the summary of our project list contained herein, Willdan Associates has the in-house planning and environmental cap8bilities to provide the City with comprehensive and balanced professional services enabling us to respond to the many issues involved in the preparation of the Environmental lmpac Report on the proposed project. You will note that we are combining urban planning and environmental planning disciplines in our proposal to provide the C ty with the best possible project which will allow for both high quality design and feasible application. The combined efforts of Willdan Associates and our subconsultants, William Kunzman Associates (Traffic) , th.• Endo Company (Air Quality) , Van Houten and Associates (Noise) , and Archaeological Resource Management Corporation (Archaeology) , will result in a product which we are centain will allow the City to attain its land use objectives. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to work- ing with the City on this project. fS Respectfully submitted, E,4VISTA, a division of Willdan Associates Gary 1161anring Urban Services Director GW: jl EP-540 PROPOSED PROJECT a. T`,P proposed project consists of the consultant's preparation of an initial study and an Environmental Impact Report on the City's proposed expansion of the Huntington Beach Central Park by adding 56+ acres of park area to be developed with an equestrian center, shooting range and gun shop, a sports field complex, YMCA facility, and fast food concessions. Initial City staff comments indicate the project may be subject to public contro- versy due the expansion and may require analysis in the following areas - a Population and sociai values; o Land use and piannk _, o Traffic and circulation; o Health, safety, and noise; o Public services and utilities; o Soils and geology; o Hydrology; o Air quality; ul 0 Biology; o Cost/revenue; o Aesthetics; and o Energy. With the effort of this consultant, envirorirnental issues of primary concern will be identified and assessed to determine the potential significance of such and other impacts upon the environment as well as the identification of miti,lation measures and project alternatives to minimize the project's impact upon the en- vironment and yet allow the achievement of the City's objective to provide addi- tional recreational opportunities. I,r SCOPE Of WORK 0 PHASE i - INITiAL STUDY Purpose: The purpose of this Phase is to identify the objectives sought by the City in expanding Huntington Beach Central Park, describe the technical com- ponents of the proposed expansion, use and maintenance of.the park expansion project, and identify potential significant impacts which may arise from the im- plementation of the project. Tho initial study will distinguish between potential significant impacts and impacts found to be clearly insignificant which may then be dismissed from further consideration in the Draft EIR. End Product: This Phase will culminate in the City's adopticn of an initial study prepared pursuant to CEQA requirements and used as a basis to prepare the En- vir•onmentat impact Report. The initial study will ultimawly appear in the Appendix to the Draft EIR. 14ft Task I - City StaffiConsultant Meeiing The consultant will meet with key City staff metnba.rs to discuss the various com- ponents of tire project and identify environments, thresholds for determining degrees of potential significant impacts. City staff ,;sill bcs instr'umentai in iden- tifying issues and areas of known public controversy. P Task 2 - Notice of Preparation The Consultant will prepare a "Notice to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report" for publication by the City in a newspaper of gen«�,•_I circulation published and distributed in the City as well as to agencies, groups, and persons whc have jurisdiction by law, and expertise or interest to on U,t! prOt`f'i5ed project. The notice will establish a comment-responst- period (2 weeks) rectuvsting writ- ten comment in areas related to the project wi;icir represent potential significant impacts. Task 3 - Preparation of Initial Stuff Subsequent to input received from City staff, re:,punses to th�r "'notice of Prep- aration," and the consultant's investigation, th;r consultant will pi-epare in initial study for review and adoption by the Envii-omnontai Rt-view Carmnimoe and the City. The consultant will incorporate rut imm: nd4d cilarnt es to the ini tial study and submit it for final adoption. t)nc.v i-dupted tht- initial study will provide a basis for preparation of tho I.nvir-onmentai Impa,-A, Report winch may be focused, depending upon the findiruls dorived in th's Phase. PHASE 11 - ENVIRONMENTAL I"."?ACT' REPORT �. Purpose: The purpose of this Phase is to assess the significance of impacts associated with the project"s construction, operation, and maintenance. This will be done in the manner and Form prescribed by the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines for Preparation of E1R's. The EIR will discuss environmental effects in proportion to their severity and probability of occurrence with primary emphasis placed upon the potential significant effects identified in the initial study. End Product: This Phase of the project .will result in the submission of sixty (60) copies of the Draft EIR, fifty (50) copies of the Final EIR, and attendance by the project manager at three (3) public hearings. Task It - intr-cduc:tion The introduction to the EIR will consist of the identification of person, involved in the preparation of the EIR, the approach, format, and opportunities fir public input provided in the development of the EIR. In addition, the project will be dF:scribcd as to: its general and slwcifi, IUcation within the City of Huntington Beach arrd the- surrour.-lin,l development and neigh- borhood; th=, boundaries of the project; the objectives of the proj.yct; and the general characteristics of the project. A description of the components of the proj<,ct will be= along with a discussion of project phasing, project theme, and other des'-riptive information provided by the City. Toe proposed project will be illustrated with appropriate exhibits as provided by the proposed Master Plan for Central Park. The project site will be located on both regional and local vicinity reaps. Task 5 Pro ect Summer The project details, findings, impacts, and mitiq ition me-a,.,u-•es will k.;,! summarized as an aid to those reading thl: document. The suinniory will identify the salient findings discussed in greater detail in the body of the EIR ti�xt. Task 6 - Environrn,�!nLai Setting A brief summary of the vxistrnq e>nrironaai-ontal ,erttina wirl tact written to introduce the reader to thy! prcjoct area. This stmvaatrry veill in�cludO brief statelnetlts rOr Jlyd- ing the gW-orraorphology of the site, the surrouodinu land users, archaeoto<ly, water duality, biota, geology, population, and circulation. 'this task is designed to pro- vide an initial understanJing of the existing environmental conditions. Wherever possible information on !,he regional and local setting will by incorporated by ref- erence to other recently prepared documents. i Task 7 - Existing Environmenta` donditions, Impacts, and Mitigation A.leasures In performing this Phase of the work task, our firm will conduct data collection and literature research sufficient to establisO the existing environmental condi- tions and to nermit assessment of the impact of the project on the envk > ment. Field surveys, measurements, and/or reconnaissance will be conducte%-' in those areas where the dataris necessary to the analysis of thet proposed project. The environmental impacts associrted with the proposed project will be identified and, to the e -tent possible, quantification of these impacts will be made. Evaiva- [ tions and tests will be made to establish the effect of the proposed action on the existing environment. Consideration will be given to beneficial as well as adverse impacts and conclusions will be drawn as to the overall impact of the project. While the following work task outline defines what we believe to be the maximum effort necessary to adequately address all potential areas of concern, the initial study (Phase 1) will be utilized by the consultant to narrow the scope of issues to only those directly pertinent to the project. Based upon the initial study, the issue areas listed below will be discussed. Task 7.1 - Soils and Geological Stjdies A discussion of the pertinent cievlogical characteristics of the project r site will be presented. We will utilize existing information from available data sources (Cardoza) as tha basis for our• discussion. This report should also discuss all potential geologic hazards and constraints on the site. Task 7.2 - Hydrological/Water Quality The hydrological site chal..Aeristics will be considered utilizing existing information and reports (Cardoza) . In addition, the effects of the proposed project upon the water qualit/ of the area will be assessed for potential impact. TasK 7.3 Biological Considerations The site's existing plant and animal life will be described as well as the impact of the project on the productivity, diversity, stability, and s.rtili;y of the ecosystems of the immediate area and region, information of exist- ing resources will be compiled by a site survey as well as researching existing literature. C, Task 7.4 - Land Use and Planninc, Considerations • The existing and proposed land uses of the study area will be describA I and evaluated as to project -related impacts. Particular emphasis will "e given to the General Plen designations for the project sites and the applica- ble zoning restrictions. Compatibility with surrounding land uses will also be addressed. Task 7.5 - Archaeological and Historical Resource Considerations ' f determined a potential significant concern in the initial study, a compre- hensive data search will be conducted to provide background ii.formation on site characteristics. A short narrative history which discusses the historical uses of the project property will be prepared. The firm of Ar- chaeological Resource Management Corporation will be retained tt erform an ar; haeological and historical record search and site observation in an attempt to evaluate site characteristics. Task 7.6 - Energy Considerations As required by the State Guidelines, ►'ie impact of the project on the energy resources of the area will be discussed. The energy conservation measures incorporated into the project will be presented. Task 7.7 _. Climate and Air�Quality Existing local and regional climatology, wind dispersion patterns, and air- quality informa ;':ir, will be assessed in the report. An estimate will be ,t made, on the basis of available data, of the changes in air duality r-esultinq from these projects. The air quality will ae compat ed to the State and i ed- eral Air Quality Standards, the 208 Plan and the AQ Y1P for consistency. The Endo Company, Air- Quality Consultants, %•.ill be retained to perform an Air Quality,Climatology Analysis. Moreozer, this analysis rill con- sider the air cluality impacts of the nearby landfill. Task 7.8 -• Environmental lit"alth and Nuisance Implications The safety featurE•s which are inct�rporateci into the project will be de- scribed. This will include an analysis of impacts related to the land-riO lncated next to the project site. The anise cha,.,,ct,.r,!,tic:s or me project Sittig will taco .as�ta;;yeti. t_-x siine') noise level$ will he discussed and tht- ittlf>ZIct rrf ttltir,t>>te trtaffic on adjacent and proposed roadways v.ill he addressed. An amilysis wit: he conducted which discerns the level of the noise exposure as it i*viotes to cor,.,nuoity standards. The acoustical firm of J.J. 'fan ftouten Associates will be a-e- tained to perform the necessary analysis on the subject property and its env;runs. Task 7.9 - Public Services and Utilities e. The following utilities and public services will be contacted to determine their current status and the impact of the project on their ability to pro- vide service: (1) Electricity (6) Solid Waste Disposal (2) Gas (7) Schools (3) Telephone (8) Police (4) Water (9) Fire (5) Sewage r1W Task 7.10 - Visual and Aesthetic Resource Considerations The exi!-tang visual characteristics of the project site will be illustrated with photographs and/or plan diagrams. The impacts of the project on the visual character of the area wilt be discussed. I'h Task 7.11 - Traffic and Circulation A cimplete description of the sh-epts which will provide access to the pro- ject will be provided. The circulation plan will be assessed based upon the proje,_ted rapacity and level of service of the major stret•ts as well as their present traffic loads. Access and internal circulation routes will be reviewed for adequacy. The amount of traffic generated by the proposed pro oct %vili be estir:iated as well as the total vehicle miles per day and averae;e number of trips per day. Any existing or potential hazards associated v.ith the streets impacted Mr by the project wilt be identified. The traffic study will be conducted by the firm of 1','illiam Kunzman Associates which is familiar with the study area and the inherent traffic related issues. Task 8 - Topical Issues Task 8, 1 - Cumulative Iraataaets We will provide a discussion of the' cumulative impacts of they t�woposed pro, ject and the continued growth of the t11-0jc>ct arc .a. Pus:ihle mitigation awas- ures to reduce adverse impacts will he explored. Task 8.2 - Short -'Term vs. Lon:l 1'orrn t'fft-,As The short. and longterm effects of the prolaesed project which adversely affect the state of the environment .will be descr rt>>d. Att#,>ntion will be given to impacts which narrow the rancle of beneficial uses of the environment or pose long-term risks to health or safety. Task 8.3 - Unavoidable Environmental Impacts •. The EIR will identify impacts which are unavoidable in light of alterna- tives cr- mitigation measures which may be instituted by the project proponent. The significance of such unavoidable impacts will be iden- tified. `r"ask 8.4 - Gr-wth Inducement The ways in which the proposed project could foster industrial, residen- tial, or other growth, either directly or indirectly in the surrounding environment, will be discussed. Task 8.5 - Mitigation Measures Potential significant impacts identified in the EIR will be summarized along with measures which may he implemented for the purpose of miti- gating significant impacts to more tolerable levels or entirely eliminating the significance of potential acr-verse affects. Task 8.6 -- Alternatives to the Proposed f'raiect The alternatives that will be investigated in this task will be determined through discussions with the City. Each alternative v ill be discussed according to its salient impacts, mitigation potential, and re,ati�'e merit to the City of Huntington Beach. Task 9 - Report Preparation Task 9.1 - Administrative Draft LIR Five (5) copies of an Administrative Draft E:1R will he prepared and sub- mitted for City review and comment. The consultant will meet with staff and make such changes agreed to for inclusion in the Draft EM. Task 9.2 - Draft t_IR Once the City has reviewed and commented on the \dministrative Draft EIR, the formal Draft EIR will he submitted to tlrr, City in a form which is suitable for circulation through the State Clearingh-use and all affected agencies. Sixty (60) copies of the Draft EIR will be submitted. Task 9.3 - Final EIR Comments from State, local, and other affected agenc:ivs will be combined with appropriate responses and assembled with the Dratt EIR to produce a document which is adequate for certification and approval by the City Council. The Final EIR will be in complete compliance with CEQA, State EIR Guidelines, and City standards. Fifty (50) copies of the Final EIR will be submitted to the City. The Final EIR will be delivered within two (2) weeks after all comments are received during the review and comment period. Tne document will include any revisions required and responses to all comments which were submitted during the review and comment period. Task 10 - P.;eetings The Project Manager (Mr. Gary H. Werner) will be available to present the docu- ment and to answer questions regarding content and adequacy at three (3) public hearings and at any appeal hearings based upon the inadequacy of the report. Associated consultants will also be available for attendance. The project manager and associated consultants will be available for attendance at additional meetings. However attendance at such additional meetings will be considered beyond the fees quoted herein and will be subject to additional reimbursement at the consultant's standard rate schedule. Arrangements for attendance require a minimum notice of three (3) working days. E� r7 r FEE SCHEDULE Our firm proposes to conduct the necessary studies and to prepare the initial study and Environmental Impact Report in accordance with the scope of work herein described for a fixed fee of $16, 400.00, The stated price includes the following services: 1. Preparation of an initial study; 2. Preparation and submission of five (5) screen -check copies of the Administrative Draft EIR; 3. Preparation and submission of sixty (60) copies of the Draft EIR; 4. Preparation and submission of fifty (50, copies of the Final EIR; S. Attendance by the project manager at up to three (3) public hearings; and 6. Technical support at all hearings as specifier' herein. The fee was determined on the following basis: 1. Task completion (150 hours q $45,'hr.) - $ 6,750.00 2. Document preparation (24 hours 0 $20, hr.) 43 0.00 3. Document typing (60 hours ($24'hr.) 1,440.00 4. Graphic production (25 hours r' $35,Ihr.) 875.00 5. Transportation Consultant (William Kunzman = 1,725.00 Associates) 6. Air Quality Consultant (The Endo C*ornpany) 920.00 7. Eloise Consultant (Vat) fluuten & Associates) - 2,070.00 8. Archeologist (A.R.M.C.) 250.00 9. Public hearings (12 hours :' $45,hr.) 540.tt0 10. Reproduction (115 copies C., $10 copy) 1,150.00 11. Travel and deliveries - 200.00 TOTAL $16, 400.00 The fee quoted herein is negotiable based upon the City's determination to focus the EIR to issues of primary significance thereby allowing thi`; consultant O Zo adjust the scope of services accordingly. 1- 1• 1* PROJECT SCHEDULING The completion of work tasks resulting in the submission of various reports will be accomplished within the following time Frame subsequent to the City's authorization of a professional se. vices cur tra -t: t. Submission of Initial Study 2 weeks 2. Submission of Screen -Check Draft EIR 6 weeks 3. Submission of Draft EIR. 3 weeks 4. Submission of Final EIR 2 weeks This time schedule takes into account the corisultant's performance of tasks as described in the scope of services. This schedule does riot account for public review periods and staff comments which will extend the time frame of the project. i p,--t :7 f 7, I i-- ral": 41 4 t ;�: 7 - �' i . BEACH OEPT: h r, ti, d 3A 100 Hurt!Won Beact;, ct. December 3, 1981 Department of Development Services City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attn: Mr. Howard Zelefsky, Assistant Planner Subject: EIR 81-5, Central Park Expansion Dear Mr-. Zelefsky: ,^ A DIV 'ICN CK P,,ANNERS + ENGINEERS + ARCHITECTS This letter shall serve as additional clarification to our proposal of November 19, 1981 to prepare an environmental impact report on the Central Park Expansion Project. Subsequent to the submission of our proposal, we have had additional discussions with several City staff members and the City's landscape architect (Cardoxa-Dillalo Assoc.), relative to the scope of the project, and found several additional areas of concern which must be addressed in our proposal. Therefore, we respectfully request our proposal of November 19, 1981 be supplemented with the additional informat on contained herein. In summary, we propose to supplement our November 19, 1981 proposal as fol I.ows: l+ Task 7.2 (optional addendum to be added if deemed necessary by the City) - Time and materials up to $2,000. Cost breakdown - engineering services, 40 hours at $50 per hour 2. Add public input task (meetings with community groups) $1, 800. Cost breakdown - planning services, 40 hours at $45 per hour 3. Contingency reserve - Time and materials up to $2,700. Cost breakdown - planning services, 60 hours at $45 per hour These additional services and other points of clarification follow: 1745 ORANGEWOOD AVENUE SUITE 210, ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92668 (7 W) 978•6185 EXHIBIT "C" 1. Cost Breakdown (hours and fees) by Tasks - Attached you will find a cost breakdown of the professional services as described in the November 19, 1981 proposal. This cost breakdown identifies the projected number and cost of staff hours necessary to accomplish the project as originally proposed. Availability of Data - In our prelir„inary discussions. with City staff we were informed that soils, geologic, and hydrologic (and wa --r quality) data was available from Cardoza-Dillalo Associates. Subsequent discus- sions with that firm have identified that such data was not currently avail- aole. However, the landscape architect will be securing the services of a soils engineer. Provided our firm can coordinate the preparation of the MR with the development of soils data and the City would accept supplemental geologic data as reported by Envista in EIR 77-12, no futher costs would be generated. However, with regard to the hydrologic and water quality assessment (Task 7.2), it is our understanding that the landscape architect will not be in a position to provide data necessary for an adequate water quality assessment. In the event the City feels water quality will be a significant environmental issue and additional engineering analysis is deemed ncessary to adequately respond to such issues, we recommend a supplment to our proposal amounting to $2, 000. This fee would provide up to 40 staff hours ($50 per hour) to per- form such an assessment to be billed on a time and materials basis. 3. Public Controversy_ - As you are aware, an initial study identifying the potential environmental effects and their relative significance was not pre- pared by the City. Given that and the many unknown variables in terms of actual land uses proposed in the park plan, we are unable to accura°ely judge the actual cost of preparing are EIR which adLqL•itely responds to the potentially significant issues which may ultimately surface. Therefore, we propose to supplement our November 19, 1981 proposal with two additional tasks as follows: A. Public_ Input - To provide adequate opportunity to the public in identifying their concerns, we propose an additional 40 hours at $45 per hour (S1, 800) to be used for additional public meetings and for the documentation of such meetings. B. Continency Reserve -• In ordet --upplement the EIR reldtive to significant issues which may be under estimated due to the absence of an initial study or a tack of available data, a contingency reserve equal to 60 hours at $45 per hour ($2, 800) is proposed. The contin- gency reserve would not be used unless necessary. However, if utilized, the contingency reserve will be billed on a time and materials basis. q, Fiscal Analysis - In our proposal (Task 7.9 - Public Services and Utilities), we will perform a fiscal analysis (cost/revenge) utilizing the City's ---cent economic assessment of the park plan. That analysis (and the entire EIR) will also include an assessment of the area designated "Planning Mode" provided the City identifies the preferred use of that area. Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to identify soMe concerns and a pro- posed alternative which I feel should be given consideration by the City. The Cent -al Park Expansion Project represents a rather extensive change in the local environment and has been the subjzct of considerable controversy. While I agree with the City's position that the project does merit the preparation of an EIR, perhaps the timing for requesting proposals on an EIR is premature. In talking with Cardoza- Dillalo Associates, it appears that several of the long-range land use options for the nark plan are undecided. Furthermore, while the City is aware: of the public controversy associated with the project we, as .the potential EIR consul em, have not had the benefit of sharing input, concerns, and ideas with the various parties involved with the project (the community, the City, and the park designer) . Therefore, as an alternative to the proposal offered by our firm on November 19, 1981 to prepare an initial study and EIR, we respectfully offer to prepare a master environmental assessment and initial study. The master environmental assessment would clearly document the environmental setting of the site and establish threshold standards. This master asce:.Zment would provide an acceptable measure (acceptable levels of impact) which can provide assurances to the local neighborhood and be used by the City and park designer in determining the best mixture and distribution of land use from a physical and environmental viewpoint. Once the roaster environmental assessment is prepared, an initial study can be develop .,d identifying the potential significant impacts associated with the project. Most importantly, the initial study would distinguish between significant and insignificant impacts thereby requiring any subsequent ER's to address only the significant impacts. We see this approach as a viably, option that would allow all parties involved to work together in order to achieve the primary objectives of the City while accommodating local neighborhood concerns. If the City is interested in this concept, we will be happy to provide a detailed proposal. We appreciate your cooperation in allowing us to supplement our November 19, 1981 proposal and look forward to talking to you further on this matter. Sinc rely, Kjtlo�� G y ur? Jr PIInni -ig Services DirectorEP-544 DATA AND INFORMATION REQUIRED The completion of the EIR is subject to the consultant's receipt of pertinent data which sl )uld be made av :!able by the City. The data required includes: 1. All technic. I reports, general plan studies, development information, adopted plans, znd other E1R's pertinent to the Central Park project. 2. Existing Zoning Map, Existing Land Use Ivlap, and proposed General Plan Map for the project site, vicinity, and area of impact. 3. Existing traffic studies, noise studies, and archaeological summaries. 4. Documented letters of support or opposition to the project. S. Park plans (existing and proposed) and alternatives considered. This information is requested of the City and should be made available to the consultant within one (1/ week of content authorization. Return Original and Copy completed cerUficaw to CV),oiP-K City of Huntington Beach Dept. Res c M_ anayement P.O. Box 711 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE TO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Approved ds to Form: Gail Hutton, CI it rnev CBy a This is to certify that the policies of insurance as described below have been issued to the insured by the undersigned and are in force at this time. If thesa policies are cancelled or charged in such a manner that will affect this certificate, the insurance company agrees to give 10 days prior written notice, by mail, to City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 711, Huntington Beach, Calift nia 92648. ALL ITEMS MUST BE COMPLETED, ANY DELETION OR CHANGE IN THIS FORM SHALL 9E SIGNED AND DATED BY AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSURANCE COMPANY A14D MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. Name of Insured _ WILLDAN ASSOCIATES Address of Insured 290 S. ANAHEIM BLVD SUITE 100, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92805 Location of Work or Operations to be performed _ Description, ofWovk or Operations FIR FOR HUNTINGTON CEiJ P.AL PARK EXPANSION. POLICY DATES LIMITS OF LIABILITY NAME OF COMPANY' Effective Expiration POLICIES Ili FORCE POLICY NO. In Thousands (000) (INS.) GENERAL LIABILITY [XI COMPREHENSIVE FORM 800080B 10/26/81 10/26/82 s 1.000. CSL DESIGN PROFESSION. Le, h Occurance [ f PREMISES - OPERATIONS INSURANCE COMPANY [ j EXPLOSION AND COLLAPSE HAZARD I) UNDERGROUND HAZARD [ ) PRODUCTS COMPLETED OPERATIONS HAZARD tXI CONTRACTUAL INSURANCE [XI BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE [ I INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS [ 1 PERSONAL INJURY AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY [ I COMPREHENSIVE. FORM [ 1 OWNED S CSL Each Occurance [ 1 `TIRED [ i MON•OWNED [ EXCESS LIABILITY ( J UMBRELLA FORM [ J OTHER THAN $ UMBRELLA FORM WORKERS' COMPENSATION and EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY l Additional Insured Endorsement: The insurer agrees that the City of Huntington Br •ch and its City Council. and,'or all City Council appointed groups, committees, commissions, boards and any other City Council appointed body, and/or electi%;:c and appointive officers, servants or employees of the City of Huntington Beach, when acting as such are additional insureds hereunder, for the acts of the insured, and such insurance shall be primary to any insurance of the City of Huntington Beach, as their interest m"ppear. Date 4/2182 2t D TIVE OINS K NC COMPANY IN3URANCE COMPANY DESIGN PROFESSIONALS IN t MICE CO'.' NLme r) 11 r I.It cc 7-4154Rtt�f . �'E!uT---- , ''R's't—` Addrtas Address "AMM CA[+lEUS—IME, SUITE 105 714 557-234 City NEWPORT BEACH.. CALIFORNIA 92660 Telephone 5 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT (to be executed by insured) The insured " agrees to protect, defend, indemnif/, save, and hold harmless the of Huntington Beach its .officers, agents, and employees a .' many liability, loss, damage, cost, or expense by reason ny and all liability, suits, claims, demands, judgments and causes of action by insured, his employees, agents or. a ,contractor or by any third party arising out of or in consequence of the performance of a ny operations or activi tr which this certificate of insurance is furnished.. • (1) Sole Propriotor,-..ip 12) Partnership (3) Corporation 14) Oth eta! HOLD HARMLESS SIGNED: By Insured: - 9=:� �� —� Title (All names shall be printed or typed FT Wow atch signature.) ALS If Corporation.. TWO ers muse sign, or present evidence of authorization to bind Corpnsation.