Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AESCO, Inc. - 2018-11-19
s - City of Huntington Beach F � yAv, File #: 18-447 MEETING DATE: 11/19/2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Travis K. Hopkins, PE, Director of Public Works Subject: Approve and authorize execution of Professional Services Contracts for On Call Material Testing and Engineering Services with AESCO, Inc., Twining, Inc., and Leighton Consulting, Inc., each in an amount not to exceed $250,000 Statement of Issue: The Public Works Department requires on call material testing and engineering services to support staff for the design and construction of capital improvement projects, which are identified in the annual capital improvement program. Financial Impact: The City's adopted FY 2018/19 Capital Improvement Programs (CIP) Budget totals $24.7 million for approved projects citywide. Each approved CIP project has a budget containing sufficient funding for design, environmental, engineering, construction, project management and other required costs. The three (3) recommended material testing and engineering service contracts have a maximum value of $750,000 over the next three years and will be funded on an as -needed basis within each project's individual CIP budget. As such, no additional funding is required by this action. Rec on: ATApprove and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a $250,000 "Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and AESCO, Inc. for On Call Material Testin�and Engineering Services;" and, #_B) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a $250,000 "Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Twining, Inc. for On Call Material Testing and Engineering Services;" and,,* Jze "rx;tZ7 (� *.C) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a $250,000 "Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Leighton Consulting, Inc. for On Call Material Testing and Engineering Services."* JU0ePar 41& Alternative Action(s): Do not authorize the contracts and direct staff with an alternate action. Budgeted Capital Projects City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 3 Printed on 11/15/2018 powered by Leoistzr-11 File #: 18-447 MEETING DATE: 11/19/2018 could be delayed until new contracts are approved. Analysis: On November 28, 2017, the City advertised a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") for On -Call Engineering and Professional Consulting Services. Proposals were requested and submitted in compliance with Chapter 3.03 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. Fourteen (14) proposals were received for material testing and engineering services. In accordance with qualifications -based selected procurement per the Federal "Brooks Act," State SB 419, and the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 3.03 "Professional Services", the Public Works Department established a review board. Proposals were evaluated and ranked by a three (3) member panel review team established by the Public Works Department. The reviewers were a Senior Traffic Engineer, and two (2) Public Works Contract Administrators. After conducting the entire evaluation process, including negotiation for competitive rates, the top three (3) firms were selected to increase the opportunity for competitive proposals for future projects from qualified on -call consultants. They are AESCO, Inc., Twining, Inc., and Leighton Consulting, Inc. A summary of the evaluation sheets for the top (3) firms, and the fourth (4) firm not selected, are shown in Attachment 4. The recommended contracts are to support staff for material testing and engineering services for various capital improvement projects. These services have historically been utilized to supplement City staff to meet annual CIP goals, as an extension of staff and/or to provide required expertise for unique projects. It is anticipated that these services will be required based on past years. Each project is evaluated on a case -by -case basis to determine if these as -needed services are necessary. The City's Capital Improvement Program ("CIP") Fiscal Year 2018/19 CIP totals $24.7 million in new projects. Typical design and construction support costs from use of consultants on a CIP project can vary between ten (10) to twenty (20) percent of total costs for a CIP project. Therefore, it is practical to conservatively estimate minimum annual consultant costs would be approximately $2.4 million to the City for total CIP projects or $6 million within the next three (3) years. Material testing and engineering services are typically required for all CIP projects, such as street improvements, traffic signal improvements, water improvements, sewer improvements, and other City infrastructure improvements. Therefore, these consultants were selected to meet the projected workload over the next three years with a total contract limit of $750,000. This agenda item does not require Public Works Commission Action, Environmental Status: Not applicable. Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance and maintain infrastructure Attachment(s): 1. Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and AESCO, Inc. for On City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 3 Printed on 11/15/2018 powered by LeojStarT"l File #: 18-447 MEETING DATE: 11/19/2018 Call Material Testing and Engineering Services. 2. Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Twining, Inc. for On Call Material Testing and Engineering Services. 3. Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Leighton Consulting, Inc. for On Call Material Testing and Engineering Services. 4. Professional Service Award Analysis for AESCO Inc., Twining, Inc., and Leighton Consulting, Inc., and Vendor #4 City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 3 Printed on 11/15/2018 powered by LeoistarTl PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND AESCO, INC. FOR ON CALL MATERIAL TESTING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and AESCO, a California corporation hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to provide on call material testing and engineering services; and Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts have been complied with; and CONSULTANT has been selected to perform these services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT." CONSULTANT hereby designates Kay Alabed who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. agree/ surfiiet/professional sves mayor I Of 11 10/12 3. TERM; TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of CONSULTANT are to commence on A1bVe C4- 20 /T (the "Commencement Date"). This Agreement shall automatically terminate three (3) years from the Commencement Date, unless extended or sooner terminated as provided herein. All tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than three (3) years from the Commencement Date. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be shown in Exhibit "A." This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed to in writing by CITY and CONSULTANT. In the event the Commencement Date precedes the Effective Date, CONSULTANT shall be bound by all terms and conditions as provided herein. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT on a time and materials basis at the rates specified in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference into this Agreement, a fee, including all costs and expenses, not to exceed Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000). 5. EXTRA WORK In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A" or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSULTANT will undertake such work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6. METHOD OF PAYMENT CONSULTANT shall be paid pursuant to the terms of Exhibit "B." agree/ surfnct/professional Svcs mayor 2 of 11 10/12 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT agrees that title to all materials prepared hereunder, including, without limitation, all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, computer code, language, data or programs, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall belong to CITY, and CONSULTANT shall turn these materials over to CITY upon expiration or termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. These materials may be used by CITY as it sees fit. 8. HOLD HARMLESS CONSULTANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature or liability of any kind or nature) arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT's (or CONSULTANT's subcontractors, if any) negligent (or alleged negligent) performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement by CONSULTANT, its officers, agents or employees except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. CONSULTANT will conduct all defense at its sole cost and expense and CITY shall approve selection of CONSULTANT's counsel. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONSULTANT. 9. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. This policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT's professional liability in an amount not less than One Million Dollars agree/ surfnet/professional svcs mayor 3 of 11 10/12 ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and in the aggregate. The above -mentioned insurance shall not contain a self -insured retention without the express written consent of CITY; however an insurance policy "deductible" of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) or less is permitted. A claims -made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the initiation of the scope of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. CONSULTANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following PROJECT completion. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULTANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of at least two (2) years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this Agreement. If CONSULTANT fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the CITY with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the CITY shall have the right, at the CITY's election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not effect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. CONSULTANT waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the CITY for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the CITY. 10. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage as required by this Agreement; the certificate shall: agree/ surfnet/professional sves mayor 4 of 11 10/12 A. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; B. state that the policy is currently in force; and C. shall promise that such policy shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice; however, ten (10) days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSULTANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverage in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverage shall not derogate from CONSULTANT's defense, hold harmless and indemnification obligations as set forth in this Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of the policy of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on the insurance hereinabove required. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor herein and not as an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its own cost and expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the PROJECT and/or the services to be performed hereunder. 12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not the PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall agree/ surfnet/professional Svcs mayor 5 of 11 10/12 be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as provided herein. In the event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, exhibits, report, and evidence shall, at the option of CITY, become its property and shall be promptly delivered to it by CONSULTANT. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION This Agreement is a personal service contract and the work hereunder shall not be assigned, delegated or subcontracted by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the prior express written consent of CITY. If an assignment, delegation or subcontract is approved, all approved assignees, delegates and subconsultants must satisfy the insurance requirements as set forth in Sections 9 and 10 hereinabove. 14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement. 15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 16. NOTICES Any notices, certificates, or other communications hereunder shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, to the addresses specified below. CITY and CONSULTANT may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices, certificates or agree/ surfnet/professional Svcs mayor 6 of 11 10/12 other communications will be sent by notifying the other party via personal delivery, a reputable overnight carrier or U. S. certified mail -return receipt requested: TO CITY: City of Huntington Beach ATTN: Joseph Dale 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 17. CONSENT TO CONSULTANT: AESCO, Inc ATTN: Kay Alabed 17782 Georgetown Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (714) 375-3830 When CITY's consent/approval is required under this Agreement, its consent/approval for one transaction or event shall not be deemed to be a consent/approval to any subsequent occurrence of the same or any other transaction or event. 18. MODIFICATION No waiver or modification of any language in this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by both parties. 19. SECTION HEADINGS The titles, captions, section, paragraph and subject headings, and descriptive phrases at the beginning of the various sections in this Agreement are merely descriptive and are included solely for convenience of reference only and are not representative of matters included or excluded from such provisions, and do not interpret, define, limit or describe, or construe the intent of the parties or affect the construction or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. 20. INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, void, illegal or invalid, such holding shall not invalidate or affect the remaining agree/ surtheUprofessional Svcs mayor 7 of 11 10/12 covenants and provisions of this Agreement. No covenant or provision shall be deemed dependent upon any other unless so expressly provided here. As used in this Agreement, the masculine or neuter gender and singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the other whenever the context so indicates or requires. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrary to which the parties have no right to contract, then the latter shall prevail, and the provision of this Agreement which is hereby affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law. 21. DUPLICATE ORIGINAL The original of this Agreement and one or more copies hereto have been prepared and signed in counterparts as duplicate originals, each of which so executed shall, irrespective of the date of its execution and delivery, be deemed an original. Each duplicate original shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. 22. IMMIGRATION CONSULTANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. 23. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSULTANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSULTANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for agree/ surfnet/professional sves mayor 8 of 11 10/12 CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 24. ATTORNEY' S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to construe, interpret and/or enforce the terms and/or provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, such that the prevailing party shall not be entitled to recover its attorney's fees from the nonprevailing party. 25. SURVIVAL Terms and conditions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, shall so survive. 26. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 27, SIGNATORIES Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify CITY fully for any injuries or damages to CITY in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. 28. ENTIRETY The parties acknowledge and agree that they are entering into this Agreement freely and voluntarily following extensive arm's length negotiation, and that each has had the opportunity to consult with legal counsel prior to executing this Agreement. The parties also acknowledge and agree that no representations, inducements, promises, agreements or warranties, oral or otherwise, have been made by that party or anyone acting on that party's behalf, which are not embodied in this agree/ surfiiet/professional sves mayor 9 of 11 10/12 Agreement, and that that party has not executed this Agreement in reliance on any representation, inducement, promise, agreement, warranty, fact or circumstance not expressly set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement, and the attached exhibits, contain the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersede all prior understandings and agreements whether oral or in writing between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 29. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be effective on the date of its approval by the City Council. This Agreement shall expire when terminated as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers. agree/ surfnet/professional svcs mayor 10 of 11 10/12 CONSULTANT, AESCO, Inc. COMPANY NAME A California Corporation By: - L Kay Alab d President print name ITS: (circle one) Chairman/President/Vice President CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corpolation of the State of California, - _ nA M or Q �' City Clerk Il /2SPS aS INITIATED AND APPROVED: AND By: A:� A irector of Public W rks print name ITS: (circle one) Secretary/Chief Financial Officer/Asst. Secretary - Treasurer REVIE D APPROVED: �rcityk4anager APPROVED AS Attorney agree/ surfnet/professional svcs mayor 11 of 11 10112 EXHIBIT "A" A. STATEMENT OF WORK: (Narrative of work to be performed) CONSULTANT shall provide consulting services on an'as-needed' basis for projects to be determined during the term of the agreement. During the term of the agreement, CITY may elect to solicit proposals from CONSULTANT. CITY shall issue task order for each project based upon the scope of services, work schedule, and fee proposal submitted to CITY for its review and approval. B. CONSULTANT'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: CONSULTANT'S duties and responsibilities shall be per CONSULTANT'S Statement of Qualification (Exhibit A), consistent with the City of Huntington Beach Request for Qualifications for On Call Material Testing and Engineering Services. Upon award, and the contract period, if CONSULTANT chooses to assign different personnel to the project, CONSULTANT must submit the names and qualifications of these staff to CITY for approval before commencing work. CONSULTANT shall comply with all Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), the Caltrans Construction Manual, the Federal Highway Administration requirements, and Caltrans A&E Sample Contract Language known as Exhibit 10-R, which includes, Caltrans Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment known as Exhibit 10-01 and/or 10-02, and Caltrans Disclosure of Lobbying Activities known as 10-Q (Exhibit C). C. CITY'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Furnish scope of work request for each project. 2. Furnish construction plans and specifications to the CONSULTANT. D. WORK PROGRAM/PROJECT SCHEDULE: A project schedule will be developed for each project assigned by CITY. EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT "B" Payment Schedule (Hourly Payment) A. Hourly Rate CONSULTANT'S fees for such services shall be based upon the following hourly rate and cost schedule: B. Travel Charges for time during travel are not reimbursable. C. Billinp, 1. All billing shall be done monthly in fifteen (15) minute increments and matched to an appropriate breakdown of the time that was taken to perform that work and who performed it. 2. Each month's bill should include a total to date. That total should provide, at a glance, the total fees and costs incurred to date for the project. 3. A copy of memoranda, letters, reports, calculations and other documentation prepared by CONSULTANT may be required to be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. VQ 4. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each monthly payment due. Such invoice shall: A) Reference this Agreement; B) Describe the services performed; C) Show the total amount of the payment due; D) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULTANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and E) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSULTANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT in writing of the reasons for non -approval and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" may at the option of CITY be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULTANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement has expired or is terminated as provided herein. 1 Exhibit 3 5. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized in advance and in writing by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. 2 Exhibit B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND AESCO, INC. FOR ON CALL MATERIAL TESTING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES Table of Contents Scope of Services CityStaff Assistance................................................................................................2 Term; "Time of Performance.....................................................................................2 Compensation..........................................................................................................2 ExtraWork...............................................................................................................2 Methodof Payment..................................................................................................3 Disposition of Plans, Estimates and Other Documents...........................................3 HoldHarmless.........................................................................................................3 Professional Liability Insurance.............................................................................4 Certificate of Insurance............................................................................................5 IndependentContractor............................................................................................6 Termination of Agreement.......................................................................................6 Assignment and Delegation......................................................................................6 Copyrights/Patents...................................................................................................7 City Employees and Officials..................................................................................7 Notices.........................................................................................7 Consent....................................................................................................................8 Modification.............................................................................................................8 SectionHeadings.....................................................................................................8 Interpretation of this Agreement..............................................................................8 DuplicateOriginal....................................................................................................9 Immigration...............................................................................................................9 Legal Services Subcontracting Prohibited................................................................9 Attorney's Fees..........................................................................................................10 Survival.....................................................................................................................10 GoverningLaw.........................................................................................................10 Signatories.................................................................................................................10 Entirety......................................................................................................................10 EffectiveDate................................................................................. I I ►� CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 4/25�2030DYYYY) THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the pollcy(les) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsements . PRODUCER LAURIE BRENNAN HAUCK 9114 Adams Ave ##182 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 OC98533 C ACT PHONE (702) 629-6704 a Ne.(702) 629-6701 EMAILAQQRE renoo ao . com INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAICN iNsLIFIF -Burlin ton Insurance Company INSURED Aesco, Inc. 17782 Georgetown Lane Huntington Beach, Ca 92647 (714) 375-3830 INSURERB: The Hartford INSURrRc, Houston Casualty Company INSURER D: The Hartford INSLIRER IN (RE F rco7(eir'A-rC 101 meRCA• RM/LRnN N( IkARFR- J THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CEi(riFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES OESCRIRFD HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND COND17IONSOF SUCH POLICIES LIMITS SHOWN MAN HAVE BEEN REDUCED BYPAID CLAIMS. ILTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INUL 1. BE L F M POLICY LICY XP MMlDCY Y LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL IJAHIUTY EACH OCCURRENCE L2 r. 0_00000, CLAIMS•MADE OCCUR -a orc a ca $ 100 , 000 . MED EXP An one erscn $ 5000 ,$2 A X 154BW40150 6/24/2017 /24/2010 PERSONAL RADV INJURY 000 00©. GF..N'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRO- POLICY � JECT1:1 LOC GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000. PRODUCTS-COMPIOPAGG s2,000,000. $ GTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED IN LIMIT wi $ , BODILY INJURY (Pei person) $ B X ANYAUTO ALL OWNED SCHEDULED — AUTOS AUTOS X 11R OA.U705 }{ NDN OWNED AUTOS X x 72UECTQ7770 7�7�2017 �7�201g BODILY INJURY (Per accidenq $ $ UMBRELLA LIAS OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ EXCESS UAB CLAIMS -MADE DE WORKERS COMPENSATION P' I • D AND EMPLOYERS'UABILITY ANY PROPRICTORIPARTNERIEXFCUTIVF YIN OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory 1. NH) If ea, dascdbe under D FPE N(A 72WECKTJ6780 4/11/201H /11/2019 E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE• EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,006,00 F r ( L .. 11000,000 C Professional Liab, THCC 17 22635 07Ic912017 2/09,+2018 $2,000,000. Claim/Aggre DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS 1 LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Addi4onaiRemarks Schedule, may be aiiaaad if more space is reeiLired) Certificate holder is named as an additional insured. APPROVED AS TO FORM By, r _, 4e, MICHAEL E. GATES CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF HUNTINGT•ON O PACI-I nAKI! C! 1 A VnXr City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works p BEDTI POLICIES HE CANCELLED BEFORE THE ABOVE THEREOF, THE EXPIRATK7N DATE THEREOF, NOTICE Vu1L1 BE OEUVEREO IN THE EXPIRATION 2000 Main Street ACCORDANCEWITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 0 1988-2013 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2013104) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD Orange County 17782 Georgetown Lane Huntington Beach, California 92647 AESCO Tele: (714)375-3830 Fax: (714)375-3831 Request for Qualifications FOR San Bernardino County 14163 Arrow Boulevard Fontana, California 92335 Tele: (909) 284-9200 Fax: (909)284-9201 On -Call Construction Materials Testing Services AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Public Works Department City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jim Slobojan, Fiscal Services Department AESCO 17782 Georgetown Lane Huntington Beach, California 92647 Tele: (714) 375-3830 Fax: (714) 375-3831 January 11, 2018 Construction Material Testing/Inspection ♦ Environmental ♦ Geotechnical Engineering Services Statement of Qualifications Table of Contents Section A Cover Letter AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Section B Vendor Application Form ............................................... Section C Prequalification Form ..................................................... Section D Service Category............................................................. Firm Qualifications Key Personnel Summary References and Projects AESCO's Unique Qualifications and Scope of Services Staffing and Organization Chart Appendix A Required Forms and Addendum Number One Appendix B Resumes Appendix C Sample Field and Test Reports Appendix D Certifications Appendix E Related Project Experience Appendix F Letters of Recommendation Construction Material Testing/ Inspection l Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com ................... I ...................3 FaldiKg 4werCea 57'row Ike 57sauKd V/1 11 AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Section A COVER LETTER January 11, 2018 Mr. Jim Slobojan City of Huntington Beach, Fiscal Services Division 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Request for Qualifications for On -Call Construction Material Testing Services Public Works Department City of Huntington Beach AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Dear Mr. Slobojan: AESCO is pleased to present this Statement of Qualifications to provide On -Call Construction Material Testing Services. Services will be provided for a minimum 3-year term. The scope of work may involve all phases of project development. AESCO is in acknowledgement of Addendums 1, 2 and 3. AESCO, a small business enterprise, has provided construction quality control and quality assurance services on both small and large municipal capital improvement and commercial projects in Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties over the past 25 years. AESCO has held, or is currently holding, the on -call contract for soils and materials testing and inspection services for the Cities of Huntington Beach, Santa Ana, Villa Park, Buena Park, Irvine, Lynwood, Lakewood, Riverside, and the Orange County Transportation Authority and the Los Angeles Unified School District. AESCO is a woman -owned corporation (incorporated in California) and has been in operation since 1993. AESCO is headquartered at 17782 Georgetown Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92647. Mr. Adam Chamaa, P.E., G.E., Engineering Manager, will be the point of contact during the period of the proposal evaluation. He can be reached at 17782 Georgetown Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92647, adam.chamaa@,aescotech.com, 714-375- 3830. AESCO does not anticipate the use of subcontractors for this project. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 1 Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com eaildiaq '4weeica ;720ws Ilse CFrdaad VA AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications AESCO's laboratory has been approved or certified by the Division of State Architect (DSA), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) under certification #1002, by the City of Los Angeles under certification #10191, by the CCRL, and by the AMRL. AESCO is also a current member of the Independent Assurance Program with Caltrans, CCRL, AMRL, Proficiency Sample Program, and ISO/IEC 17025. All testing will be performed in AESCO's laboratory and all work will be in compliance with applicable governing local, State and Federal agencies and laws including Caltrans. AESCO has 4 California Registered Engineers on staff. AESCO's personnel has provided construction quality control and quality assurance services and geotechnical engineering services on both large and small public works projects in Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties over the past 25 years. AESCO will respond within 24-hours upon request by the City. AESCO has reviewed the sample agreement and insurance requirements and is willing to execute the agreement as drafted and will be able to provide the required documentation following notice of award. If you need further assistance regarding this matter, please give feel free to call either myself or ebra Perez. We look forward to hearing from you. ery trul yours, AESCO, C. maa, P.E., Debra Perez CEn ' eering Manager Project Manager Kay Alabed President Construction Material Testing/ Inspection , Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services b u i C d i K y 4e z i c a www.AescoTech.com j1 z a m '74'e C z o u o d V p AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Section B VENDOR APPLICATION FORM REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL VENDOR APPLICATION FORM TYPE OF APPLICANT: ❑ NEW F CURRENT VENDOR Legal Contractual Name of Corporation: Contact Person for Agreement: Kay Alabed Corporate Mailing Address: 17782 Georgetown Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 City, State and Zip Code: 17782 Georgetown Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 E-Mail Address: Kay.Alabed@aescotech.com Phone: 714-375-3830 Fax: 714-375-3831 Contact Person for Proposals: Adam Chamaa, P.E., G.E. Title: Vice President E-Mail Address: Adam. ChamaaCRAescotech.com Business Telephone: 714-375-3830 AESCO Inc. Business Fax: 714-375-3831 Is your business: (check one) ❑ NONPROFIT CORPORATION FOR PROFIT CORPORATION Is your business: (check one) F CORPORATION ❑ LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP ❑ PARTNERSHIP ❑ UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION 1 of 2 Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 31 l' Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com va' ediK9 4wetiea ;7to,m %ke CftouKd WA ti AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Names & Titles of Corporate Board Members (Also list Names & Titles of persons with written authorization/resolution to sign contracts) Names Title Phone Kay Alabed President 7143753830 Adam Chamaa vice President 714375-3830 Federal Tax Identification Number: 72-1 253958 City of Huntington Beach Business License Number: A199958 (If none, you mast obtain a Huntington Beach Business License upon award of contract.) City of Huntington Beach Business License Expiration Date: 09-30-18 Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 4I P Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com 2of2 v"u edict9 o4merec4 7'r0M Ilse Czousd V/! ti AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Section C PRE -QUALIFICATION FORM EXHIBIT A: PRE -QUALIFICATION FORM ON -CALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES __ RVICE C A. Construction Material Testing ©/ No KA (Initial) Consultant is willing to execute the sample Agreement as drafted, including any other potentially more restrictive terms and conditions as outlined in Caltrans' LAPM. Exhibit 10-R (See Appendix B). Consultant is aware the actual Agreement "MAY" differ due to Caltrans requirement. K+ (Initial) Consultant is able to provide the insurance as required, including any other Mtentiallv more restrictive terms and conditions as outlined in Caltrans' LAPM Exhibit 10-R (See Appendix B&C). Firm Name: AESCO Firm Address: 17782 Georgetown Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Signature. Date: January 4 , 2018 Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 51 P a g c Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com buCedCdq "4mczeca 7,rcw 7 4 e Cfzou,rd Zfk M AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Section D SERVICE CATEGORY FIRM QUALIFICATIONS (i) AESCO is a woman -owned corporation (incorporated in California) and we currently have thirteen employees. AESCO has been providing services similar to those requested since 1993, a total of 25 years. AESCO has been retained as the geotechnical, construction material testing and inspection and environmental engineering firm for the City of Huntington Beach since 2001. Therefore, we are very familiar with working with the City, and in particular, the Department of Public Works. AESCO is known for responding to requests in a very timely manner and providing excellent service to the City. AESCO provides a budget to the City for each project prior to the start of work. AESCO is SBE, DBE/UDBE, WBE, and CBE certified. AESCO's laboratory is certified by DSA, Caltrans and City of Los Angeles. AESCO has been performing material testing services for various clients including the Cities of Los Angeles, Costa Mesa, Inglewood, Long Beach, Diamond Bar, Lakewood, Huntington Beach, Lynwood, Riverside, Buena Park, Irvine, Santa Ana; the Los Angeles Unified School District; Alhambra School District; SANBAG; Caltrans; Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA); and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). AESCO currently holds the on -call contract for testing and inspection services for the City of Huntington Beach. As a small firm AESCO has the ability to respond to requests immediately and can devote more attention to each project. Construction Materials 'resting and Inspection Services AESCO operates a construction materials engineering (CME) laboratory in Huntington Beach, California, and is capable of performing in-house or on -site testing and inspection services. AESCO also regularly tests and inspects brick, granite, stone masonry, mortar, reinforcing steel, and manufactured elements such as pre -stressed beams and pre -cast panels. Engineering consultation and inspection services are available for each phase of construction including: Aggregate Evaluation, Concrete Mixtures -Design, Inspection, and Testing, Bituminous Materials Testing, Refractory Testing, Roof Inspection and Testing, Soils Compaction and Stabilization Tests and Inspection, Structural Steel Fabrication and Erection Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 6 � i, Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com b"uitdiag 4wetdca 57TOW 7kc Cjtauad Zffi AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications AESCO Inspection, Qualification of Welders and Procedures, Welding Inspection, and Rebar Inspection. AESCO provides full grading inspection services during construction. To expedite site grading, AESCO can set up a portable laboratory on site, capable of performing most of the essential tests that may be required. Geotechnical Engineering Services AESCO's geotechnical investigations have included: foundation and pavement design, settlement problems, compaction monitoring and testing, shallow and deepened foundations, pressure injected footings, earth retaining structures, landslide analysis and control, expansive/collapsing soils, underpinning and special foundations, construction dewatering and drainage, pipelines and utilities, liquefaction analyses, and fault evaluation. Laboratory testing is performed using ASTM, AASHTO, and other applicable specifications and guidelines. Environmental Engineering AESCO can provide a full range of Environmental Engineering services that are vertically integrated to deliver a complete "turnkey" package including: Phase I -Initial Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), the Phase II -Investigation, Phase III-Remediation and Mitigation Design, and Final Close Out Report. In addition, AESCO provides a range of Regulatory Compliance services. While working on the City of Huntington Beach Projects, each team member is responsible to a registered Engineer who is available to assist inspection personnel on interpretation of test requirements, plans and specifications interpretation and Building Code matters of compliance. AESCO generates thousands of material testing reports for soils, concrete, steel and other building materials from our Huntington Beach laboratory. The Huntington Beach facility comprises of over 6000 square feet laboratory equipment with state of the art testing equipment. AESCO's testing equipment is fully computerized and connected to our main server. AESCO's reports are digitalized and maintained on AESCO's main frame server and Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 7 I I, a Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services �u i 8 d i Kg o1 rx e z i e a www.AescoTech.com 57z a w %k e Cf z a a K d Zf�tt I� AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications on the web for immediate access for our engineers and clients. AESCO has NEVER had any OSHA citations. AESCO has never had any outstanding or pending complaints through the Better Business Bureau, State of California Department of Consumer Affairs. KEY PERSONNEL SUMMARY (ii) AESCO has 4 registered engineers and employees that are experienced; we have the necessary resources and technical knowledge to guarantee that the services required for your projects are provided within your budget, timetable and quality expectations; and can accommodate your project's staffing needs. Name Years of Experience Education/Credentials Adam Chamaa 30+ B.S. Civil Engineering, Engineering M.S. Civil Engineering Manager Licensed California Engineer, P.E. C.E. No. C53992 Licensed California Geotechnical Engineer G.E. No. GE2784 Nuclear Density Machine Operator Russell L. Scharlin 30+ B.S. Civil Engineering Quality Control M.S. Civil Engineering Manager Licensed California Engineer. P.E. C.E. No. C25723 Licensed California Geotechnical Engineer G.E. No. 751 Amer Hazboon 20+ B.S. Civil Engineering Environmental M.B.A. Engineer Licensed California Civil Engineer. P.E. C.E. No. C64478 Certifications: 40-hour Health and Safety Training Registered Deputy Inspector for the City of Los Angeles, Methane Mitigation Systems ICC Certified California UST System Operator Certified Liquid Boot Inspector Certified Tremco Barrier Inspector Andrew Stone, C.G., 30+ B.S. Geology C.G.E. Certified Engineering Geologist (C.E.G.) Engineering Certification No. 1648 Geologist Debra Perez 30+ B.S. Renewable Natural Resources Pro'ect Mana er Nuclear Density Machine Operator David J. Ryan, P.E. 40 B.S. Civil Engineering Senior Engineer Licensed California Engineer, P.E. C.E. No. C49661 Construction Material Testing/ Inspection g I P a g C Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com Vaded[ag 4me teca 57saw 7 d e qtc" ad Vit I� AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Duane Wentworth 40 University of California, Berkeley Extension. Certificate for Senior Inspector Construction Inspection of Traffic Signals and Highway Lighting Systems. California State University, Long Beach. Major: Mechanical Engineering. Orange Coast College. A.A. Engineering Caltrans Resident Engineers Academy Asphalt Materials from the Asphalt Institute Kay Alabed, 25 B.S., Dental Medicine Project Coordinator Omar Chamaa 11 B.S., Civil Engineering Quality Control E.I.T. Certificate No. 135299 Engineer Hazardous Materials 40-hour Training ICC Certified Reinforced Concrete Caltrans Certificate of Proficiency for: Calculations Pertaining to Gradings & SpG, Sampling Highway Materials & Products, Soil & Aggregate Sample Preparation, Sieve Analysis of Fine & Coarse Aggregates, Sand Equivalent, Air Content, Freshly Mixed Concrete, Pressure, Density of Fresh Concrete, Flexural Strength of PCC, Ball Penetration in Fresh Portland Cement Concrete, Sampling Freshly Mixed Concrete, PCC Cylinder Fabrication, Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete -Volumetric Method, Slump of Fresh Portland Cement Concrete, Temperature of Freshly Mixed Portland Cement Concrete City of Newport Beach Deputy Inspector City of Garden Grove Deputy Inspector City of Long Beach Deputy Inspector City of Riverside Deputy Inspector Radiation Safety and Use of Nuclear Gage ACI Concrete Field Testing Technician TWIC Giovanni Mikhael 11 AWS Welding Inspector Inspector Caltrans Certificate of Proficiency for: Air Content, Freshly Mixed Concrete, Pressure, Density of Fresh Concrete, Flexural Strength of PCC (Fabrication only), Ball Penetration in Fresh Portland Cement Concrete, Sampling Freshly Mixed Concrete, PCC Cylinder Fabrication, Slump of Fresh Portland Cement Concrete, Temperature of Freshly Mixed Portland Cement Concrete County of Los Angeles Certified Inspector I ariq Abdullah 15 B.S., Geology Laboratory Manager Caltrans Certificate of Proficiency for: Calculations for Gradings & SpG, Soil & Aggregate Prep., Sieve Analysis of Fine & coarse Aggregates, Percentage of Crushed Particles, Specific Gravity & Absorption of Fine and coarse Aggregate Sand Equivalent, Moisture content, Cleanness of Coarse Aggregate, Durability Index, R- Value Soils and Bases, Preparation of Bituminous Mixtures for Testing, Bulk Secific Gravity & Denisty of Bituminous Mixtures, Theoretic Max Specific Gravity & Density of Bituminous Paving Mixtures, Stabilometer Value, Moisture Content using Microwave, Asphalt Content of Bituminous Mixes, Ignition Method Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services 9I Page E"u i l d 1 K g rQac e z l e a www.AescoTech.com AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications NICET Level II for: Asphalt, Concrete, Soil Radiation Safety and Use of Nuclear Gage Ruben Rocha 12 B.A., Business, Devry University, in progress Inspector Professional Certifications: County of Los Angeles Certified Deputy Inspector Masonry and Concrete ICC Structural Masonry and Concrete Certified Inspector ACI Certified, Concrete Field Testing Technician Certified Radiation Safety and Nuclear Gage Operator Caltrans Certificate of Proficiency for: Air Content, Freshly Mixed Concrete, Pressure, Density of Fresh Concrete, Flexural Strength of PCC (Fabrication only), Ball Penetration in Fresh Portland Cement Concrete, Sampling Freshly Mixed Concrete, PCC Cylinder Fabrication, Slump of Fresh Portland Cement Concrete, Temperature of Freshly Mixed Portland Cement Concrete TWIC Card Note: Certificates of AESCO's Registered Engineers are included within Appendix D. Inspector certificates are available upon request. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services S' u C f d C K g r1 ox e z l e a www.AescoTech.com 7 z o m 7 4 e 5 z o u a d VA AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications REFERENCES and PROJECTS (iii) Client Name: Orange County, Department of Public Works, September 2016 to Current Project Name: ADA Restroom Upgrade and Office Improvements and other on -call contracts Contact Name & Phone: Mr. Erik Nelson, Project Manager III (657) 247-1298 Email: Erik.Nelson n,ocpw.oc og v.com Scope of Work: Materials Testing and Inspections, Geotechnical Engineering AESCO Project Manager: Adam Chamaa, P.E., G.E. Key Personnel: Dave Ryan, P.E., Quality Control Manager, Giovanni Michael, Inspector. Client Name: City of Santa Ana, June 2010 to Current Project Name: First Street Bridge Replacement and Road Rehabilitation and other on -call contracts Contact Name & Phone: Mr. Gerardo Lechuga, Project Manager (714) 552-5336 Email: glechuga(&santa-ana.org Scope of Work: Materials Testing and Inspections AESCO Project Manager: Adam Chamaa, P.E., G.E. Key Personnel: Russell J. Scharlin, P.E., G.E., Quality Control Manager; Omar Chamaa, Field Engineer and Inspector; Giovanni Michael, Inspector. Client Name: City of Corona, September 2013 to December, 2015 Project Name: Geotechnical and Materials Testing for Auto Center Drive Grade Separation Contact Name & Phone: Ms. Linda Bazmi, Senior Engineer (951) 830-2132 Email: Linda. Bazmi(a,ci.corona.ca.us Scope of Work: Materials Testing and Inspections AESCO Project Manager: Russ Scharlin, P.E., G.E. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services 11 P a g c $' u C e d C K g f! e z[ e a www.AescoTech.com d Zf A M= AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Key Personnel: Adam Chamaa, P.E., G.E., Quality Control Manager; Omar Chamaa, Field Engineer and Inspector; Giovanni Michael, Inspector. Client Name: City of Villa Park, August 2012 to Current Project Name: Sewer Line Replacement Program Contact Name & Phone: Mr. Akram Hindiyeh, City Engineer (949) 547-0816 Email: ahindiyehia'�,villapark.org Scope of Work: Geotechnical Engineering and Materials Testing AESCO Project Manager: Adam Chamaa, P.E., G.E. Key Personnel: Russell J. Scharlin, P.E., G.E., Quality Control Manager; Omar Chamaa, Field Engineer and Inspector. Client Name: City of Huntington Beach, September 2017 to Present Project Name: Beach Boulevard Water Main Extension Contact Name & Phone: Mr. John Griffin, Contract Administrator (949) 375-5011 Email: j riffin surfcity hb.org Scope of Work: Construction Management, Materials Testing and Inspections AESCO Project Manager: Dwayne Wentworth Key Personnel: Adam Chamaa, P.E., G.E., Quality Control Manager, Dave Ryan, P.E., Construction Management, Testing and Inspections Client Name: County of Orange and Caltrans, October 2011 to January, 2014 Project Name: Seismic Remediation, John Wayne Airport Contact Name & Phone: Mr. Steve Chaky, Project Manager (949) 252-5275 Email: schakyLa)ocair.com Scope of Work: Materials Testing and Inspections AESCO Project Manager: Russell J. Scharlin, P.E., G.E. Key Personnel: Adam Chamaa, P.E., G.E., Quality Control Manager; Jess Lim, Inspector; Giovanni Michael, Inspector. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 2 I' , Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services $' u t E d i a g df ai e z i e a www.AescoTech.com z a w 7 k e Cf z a u a d V /.? al AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications AESCO's UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS and SCOPE OF SERVICES (iv) AESCO has been performing materials testing, construction inspection, geotechnical engineering, and environmental engineering for the City of Huntington Beach since 2001. We have performed geotechnical engineering, environmental engineering and construction materials testing and inspections for projects ranging from street rehabilitation to lift stations and new structures. AESCO's location within the City makes AESCO an ideal candidate to perform the required scope of services in a very timely manner. We have always provided immediate response to all requests and have worked around the clock on emergency projects, as needed. The project consists of performing on -call construction materials testing for various public works infrastructure projects for the next 3 years. The Scope of Services may include, but not be limited to, the following: all tests to be performed in accordance with the Caltrans Construction Manual, the Caltrans Standard Specifications and Project Special Provisions, the City's Quality Assurance Program (QAP), Department of Transportation, Construction Manual, Chapters 3 and 6; initial "Samples and Tests" on proposed materials and "Acceptance Tests" on materials placed, and other Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirements; testing to be conducted within our Caltrans Certified laboratory by Caltrans accredited personnel; density tests will be performed with a nuclear densometer or sand cone and maximum density curves will be performed on various materials in accordance with ASTM D1557; concrete cylinders and slump testing by ACI certified technician; compression strength testing per ASTM C39; maintain records of all samples and tests including failing tests and retests, provide test results with statement regarding pass or fail signed by authorized representative; maintain Testing Plan and Log submitted monthly with the Contract Quality Control Report; maintain a rework Items list of work which does not comply with the Contract; perform maximum density tests at job site; maintain records of samples and tests, including failing tests, in permanent job file; use economical mode of transportation; upon completion of project provide a Materials Certification noting all non- conforming materials; the materials certification memorandum to be signed by a California licensed engineer; all Non -Compliance results of materials to be reported to City Project Manager and Project Inspector within 24 hours. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services 131 1 www.AescoTech.com Faildw ovq �4wezte4 574/0N[ I e J%o am d %L/; AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications RESUMES (v) Resumes are included within the Appendix. STAFFING AESCO offers the City an integrated team comprised of engineers, geologists, engineering technicians and deputy inspectors experienced in all aspects of municipal development and construction testing. Staff will be available for the City of Huntington Beach projects at all times. No sub -consultants are anticipated for this project. Organization Chart M4111— iNGTON BIFS ACF-� Vice President/Geotechnical Engineer Adam Chamaa, P.E., G.E. Project Manager Quality Control Director/Geotechnical Engineer Russ Scharlin, P.E., G.E. Quality Control Manager Duane Wentworth Dave Ryan, P.E. Quality Control Laboratory Supervisor Taria Abdullah Quality Control Coordinator Omar Chamaa, E.I.T. Kay Alabed Materials Testing and Inspection Personnel Giovanni Michael Ruben Rocha 20+ Additional Inspectors As Needed Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services 14I Page 5 u i C d i u g ri crc e¢ C e a www.AescoTech.com z o rx I k e Cf ¢ o u K d Zl k AF'SCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications UNDERSTANDING and METHODOLOGY AESCO has been retained as the construction material testing and inspection, geotechnical and environmental engineering firm for the City of Huntington Beach for the past 17 years. Therefore, we are very familiar with working with the City and in particular the Department of Public Works. AESCO is known for responding to requests in a very timely manner and providing excellent service to the City. AESCO provides a budget to the City for each project prior to the start of work. Every project has its own unique scheduling and construction challenges; therefore, AESCO's methodology is intended to be flexible and allows input from the Owner to guarantee smooth completion of the project. AESCO's team is comprised of some of the most experienced professionals in the industry. The overall project team is always available for discussions regarding the project in order to craft solutions. Each inspector has multiple licenses that allow them to perform various inspection duties simultaneously, thus creating an efficient budget for the Owner. AESCO will provide qualified soil technicians and deputy inspectors with extensive public facility, utility and roadway site grading experience. AESCO's method of operation is the following: • Prior to the start of any project AESCO will become familiar with the contract documents, project plans, technical specification, etc. and existing site(s) and conditions, and other pertinent project documents and meet with the CITY to review staffing, project needs, coordinate inspections and testing, and will also attend the pre -construction meeting(s) if requested. • AESCO provides a 24-hour live answering service and one of our Project Engineers is always available to answer any technical or scheduling issues. Technicians shall be available upon 24-hour notice, or less, and for occasional night work. • AESCO digitally controls all assigned tasks to our technicians and each unit of service is closely watched by our project manager. AESCO does not exceed the assigned budget for its services prior to authorization by the CITY. • The inspector (or inspectors) then arrives at the site to perform the required testing and inspections. The technician will arrive at the site with the correct equipment, Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 15 � Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services I' b u i E ci i K 9 '4W e x C c a www.AescoTech.com 7.1 o W I k e C1 z o a c Zf AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications calibrated to existing standards with documentation. Equipment calibration shall be performed prior to the start of work and costs are included in the total hourly rate for field services. All samples will be transported from the project site to the laboratory for testing as required. • All breaks and other laboratory testing are scheduled through our electronic dispatch system where notification is automatically issued to the laboratory manager to perform specific tests, such as: breaks of concrete cylinders at a schedule of 7, 14 and 28-day breaks; beam, masonry, prism breaks; aggregate testing; etc. • Daily field reports and test results are created digitally in a standard report format and emailed within 24 hours of completion of the test or inspection to the CITY. Field testing/compaction results of subgrade or asphalt concrete shall be communicated to CITY personnel as soon as the tests have been completed, on same day of testing, with hard copy to follow. • Any test or inspection deficiencies, such as; failing compaction, concrete not reaching the required strength, concrete with high slump, cleanness of rebar, cleanness of footings, etc., will be discussed immediately with the CITY Inspector. Our professionals will provide practical solutions to critical issues encountered in the field, considering both cost and technical implications. • A draft report summarizing test results and raw data will be submitted for review following completion of construction which will summarize all failed and passing tests. The report will include the tests performed, testing dates and test standard used. After written approval, copies of the final certification report of all inspection services performed for specific projects will be completed within 10 working days. All laboratory reports and inspection reports are supervised, reviewed and signed by a California Licensed Professional Engineer/Geotechnical Engineer. • AESCO will comply with OSHA requirements Safety Standards. On occasion, technicians are required to enter confined spaces to perform work and will have completed confined space training and have proof of training upon arrival to do confined space work. • All inspectors are required to communicate on a daily basis with our Quality Control Manager who ensures that all work is being performed in accordance with the Quality Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 16 i P Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services S u i P d 1 K g ri ac a: t c a www.AescoTech.com z o �x % k e Cj z a u a d Zf !z AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Control Manual. AESCO has been successful in consistently completing its projects within the assigned budget and schedule. We thoroughly evaluate our task and scope of work, and build an efficient budget for our work. Therefore, we seldom exceed the budget or schedule. AESCO has a practice of obtaining advance approval from clients prior to initiating any work which will add costs to the originally approved budget. AESCO maintains a strict Quality Control Program (QAP). AESCO is a member of, and certified by several independent certification agencies, such as DSA, AMRL, CCRL, Caltrans, the City of Los Angeles, and the City of San Diego. AESCO is also part of the yearly reference sampling program for these agencies. These involvements ensure a rigorous training of AESCO's technicians and test method verifications. Test results and field reports are reviewed by AESCO's project manager and quality control engineer, each of whom has 30 years of experience. INNOVATIVE and FLEXIBLE APPROACHES AESCO has used various approaches to save clients time and money as shown below: • AESCO can provide immediate response to short notice requests • AESCO is available to work around the clock, when needed • AESCO has a Geotechnical Engineer/Project Engineer available at all times to respond to emergency needs • AESCO can provide a fully equipped concrete mobile laboratory to assist in immediate on -site testing • An example of our approach is the emergency response AESCO provided to the City of Huntington Beach when a large sinkhole developed in the middle of one of the major thoroughfares; Warner Avenue. AESCO personnel were on -site around the clock to assist in the repair and to devise a dewatering system to be used during construction. The project was completed approximately 20 percent earlier than was anticipated. • AESCO also provided emergency response to the Alhambra Unified School District when an excavation flooded at night due to broken water line at Garfield Elementary School. AESCO's Geotechnical Engineer was on -site at 7:00 A.M. on a Saturday to Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com 9 z o m % is e Ci z o u K d Zf,t AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications assist the District in mitigation of the problem and to stabilize the subgrade. • As part of AESCO's innovative approach to testing and inspection AESCO monitored the contractor's curing procedures and modified as necessary to protect the concrete from extreme hot and cold weather conditions during the construction of the Whitegates Reservoirs for the City of Riverside. Daily inspections were required to monitor the concrete temperature and humidity to prevent micro -cracking of the concrete due to shrinkage and expansion. AESCO also instructed the contractor to provide heat blankets to maintain the curing temperature of the concrete as concrete placement was performed during cold weather during the construction of the Brea- Olinda Landfill Gas -to Energy Facilities for the County of Orange. AESCO also provided special soil stabilization and subgrade enhancement recommendations to mitigate the wet, fine soil during construction of Northrup Elementary School for the City of Alhambra. AESCO also evaluated the effects of the existing trees on the new construction and provided recommendations to mitigate distress due to roots and landscaping. • AESCO has performed construction materials testing and inspection services on several Federally funded projects including several roadway rehabilitation projects for the City of Huntington Beach and Pomona and several grade separation and freeway widening projects for Caltrans which were all partially state and federally funded. • AESCO has a strong financial base, and has never experienced any bankruptcy, pending litigation, office closure, nor has any impending merger in the near future. AESCO is able to complete projects within the established schedule, and does not add on additional work without prior authorization. • AESCO's commitment to quality assurance extends to field and laboratory staff that is certified in various technical disciplines by multiple agencies such as Caltrans, ACI, NICET, and ICC. AESCO's accredited materials testing laboratory and collection of resourceful field and laboratory equipment enable our professionals to efficiently determine precise methods for qualifying construction materials. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services 18 P www.AescoTech.com building 4wezica 91ta"t Ile 1f%eaad 'dffd 0 AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications APPENDIX A REQUIRED FORMS and ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services I `` www.AescoTech.com Vau ediaq 4wesCe4 9,tow %!re GFzaaad IY/,! I 1 AESCO C( Environs AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-01 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment EXHIBIT 10-01 CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT 1. Local Agency: City of Huntington Beach 2. Contract DBE Goal 0% 3. Project Description: On -Call Material Testing and Inspection Services 4. Project Location: Huntington Beach, CA 5. Consultant's Name: AESCO 6 Prime Certified DBE: fid 7 Description of Work. Service, or Matenals Supplied 8. DBE Certification Number 9. DBE Contact Information a 10 DBE/o Materials testing and inspection services 35370 Kay Alabed 714-375-3830 100% Local Agency to Complete this Section 11. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION o 100 /o 17 Local Agency Contract Number 18. Federal -Aid Project Number: 19 Proposed Contract Execution Date: (NAME) IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on this form is complete and accurate. required 1 C% 1-4-18 20. Local Agency Representative's Signature 21. Date 12. Preparer's Signature 13. Date Kay Alabed 714-375-3830 22. Local Agency Representative's Name 23. Phone 14. Preparer's Name 15 Phone President 24. Local Agency Representative's Title 16. Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: Original — Included with consultant's proposal to local agency ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management 1120 N Street. MS-89, Sacramento. CA 95814, Page 1 of 2 .July 23, 2015 0 AESCO Local Assistance Procedures Manual AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Exhibit 10-02 Consultant Contract DBE Commitment EXHIBIT 10-02 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMCCMENT 1. Local Agency City of Huntiington Beach 2 Contract DBE Goal 0% 3 Project Description: On -Call Material Testing and Inspection Services 4 Project Location Huntington Beach, CA 5 Consultant's Name AESCO Inc 6. Prime Certified DBE: 4 7. Total Contract Award Amount: TBD 8. Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants: No Subconsultants 9 Total Number of ALL Subconsultants: 0 10. Description of Work, Service, or Materials Supplied 11. DBE Certification Number 12. DBE Contact Information 13. DBE Dollar Amount Material Testing and Inspection Services 35370 Kay Alabed 714-375-3830 TBD Local Agency to Complete this Section 14. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION $ TBD 20. Local Agency Contract ,mt er (NAME) 100 21. Federal -Aid Project Number: 22. Contract Execution nnt. Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, this form is complete and accurate. regardless of tier Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required. 1-8-18 23. Local Agency Representative's Signature 24. Date 15. Preparer's Signature 16. Date Kay Alabed 714-375-3830 25. Local Agency Representative's Name 26 Phone 17. Preparer's Name 18 Phone President 27. Local Agency Representative's Title 19 Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: 1 Original —Local Agency 2. Copy — Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract execution may result in de -obligation of federal funds on contract ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. Cc Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com Page 1 of 2 July 23, 2015 6'"lCddsr9 ,#mealea 7,10M 7,ic Claaund %(/-, AAESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q Disclosure of Lobbying Activities ExHiBrr 10-Q DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352 1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type: ❑✓ a contract ❑ a. bid/offer/application ❑ a. initial b grant b. initial award b. material change e cooperative agreement c. post -award d loan For Material Change Only: e loan guarantee year quarter f loan insurance date of last report _ 4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 Is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime: ❑ Prime ❑Subawardee Tier ifknown Congr",viontal District, if known 6. Federal Department/Agency: 8. Federal Action Number, if Mown: 10. Name and Address of Lobby Entity (If individual. last name, first name, MI) Congressional District, if known 7. Federal Program Name/Description: C FDA Number, if applicable 9. Award Amount, if (mown: 11. Individuals Performing Services (including address if different from No 10) (last name, first name, MI) (attach Continuation Sheevsl if necessary) 12. Amount of Payment (check a6 that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) S (CONSULTAN actual ❑ planned a. retainer b. ore -time fee 13. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission cash d contingent fee Ba. b in -kind; specify: nature a deferred Value _ . f. other, specify _...._ __. 15. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including olficer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 12: (attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary) 16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes ❑ No ❑ 17. information requested through this farm is authorized by Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. 'Ibis disclosure of lobbying reliance Signature: ' was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. Print Name: Kay Alabed 1352. This information will be reported to Congress --- - semiannuallyandwillbeavailableforpublicinspection. Any Title: president person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10.000 and not more than S100,000 for each such failure. Telephone No.: 714-375-3830 Date: 1-8-18 Federal Case Only: Distribution: Ong- Local Agency Project Files Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form - LLL Page 1 LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013 Construction Material Testing/ Inspection �{ at e z i c a l Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services .t �� C 3' u i C d C k 9 www.AescoTech.com 57,to w % ic e fl t o u e d VA AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Local assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 17-F Final Report -Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) and First -Tier Subcontractors E.l-HIBff 17-F FINAL REPORT -UTILIZATION OF DISADVANTAGED BCSISESS E\7ERPRISES (DBE) AND FIRST -TIER StBCONTRACTORS 1 Local Agency Contract Number 2 Federal -Aid Project Number 3. Local Agency City of Huntington Beach 4. Contract Completion Dale TBD 5. Contractor/Consultant 6 Business Address 7. Final Contract Amount TBD 8 Contract he Number 9 Description of Work. Service, or Materials Supplied t ppI 10 Company Name and Business Address 11 DBE Certification Number 12. Contract Payments 13 Date Work Completed 14. Dale of Final Payment Non -DBE DBE Materials testing and inspection services AESCO 17782 Georgetown Lane. Hunt. Beach, CA 92647 35370 15 ORIGINAL DBE COMMITMENT AMOUNT S TBD 16. TOTAL List al fast-Eer wlo—m ctcrV.1,,nw6nts rid DBEs regardless doer whether or not the fans were originally listed for god aedl- 9 actual DBE ukiation (or aeon of work) was different than that approved at the time of n .rlralinnalmti lia arn�al amninr nrA rn rnh onr4r Ifm a�MMnchachnhcmcueeda rare esadmtllecmtrxd indcatamdafam I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS COMKXTE AND CORRECT 17 ContractorlConsulant Representative's Signature 18. Contractor/Consultant Representatives Name Kay Ala bed 19 Phone 714-375-3830 20. Date 1/8118 I CERTIFY THAT THE CONTRACTING RECORDS AND ON -SITE PERFORMANCE OF THE DBE(S) HAS BEEN MONITORED 21. Local Agency Representative s Signature 22. Local Agency Representative's Name 23 Phone 24. Date DISTRIBUTION. Original - Local Agency,Copy- Celhans District Local Assistance Engineer InNude with Final Roped of Expealditum ADA NOTICE: For mdvidnh with sensory dsabilees, the decument is available in afternafe formats. Fa nkrmation, call (916) 4451233. Local Assistance Procedures Manual TTY 711. or write to Records and Forms Management. 1120 N Street, fASBB Sacramento. CA 95914 Page 1 of 2 3uh 23,2015 Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services e c a z C www.AescoTech.com z d cu % 4 e C z o u if AESCO AF,SCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department 2000 Main Street Tel. (714) 960-8820 ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE For RFQs — Water, Plan Check, Ocean, Architectural, 'Transportation, Construction Management, Materials, Civil in the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH November 29, 2017 Notice To All: City of Huntington Beach has extended the due date from January 41h, 4:00 pm 2018 to January 111h, 4:00 pm 2018 for eight (8) Request For Qualifications (RFQ) for various professional services (Water, Plan Check, Ocean, Architectural, Transportation, Construction Management, Materials, Civil). This is to acknowledge receipt and review of Addendum Number One, dated November 29, 2017 AESCO Company Name 01-04-18 Date By Kay Alabed All bidders must acknowledge and include the receipt of this Addendum with your RFQ packages. Cc Environs CC1392, Addendum No, 1 Page 1 AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications APPENDIX B RESUMES Construction Material Testing/ Inspection I' Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services �u i l d i K g rf Kc e x C c a www.AescoTech.com 7-tow % k e Cj x 0 u K d Zf,e AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Adam Chamaa Engineering Manager, M.S.C.E., P.E., G.E. ---------------- Registered civil and geotechnical engineer with over 30 years of Education: experience as geotechnical engineer and quality control/quality M.S. Civil assurance (QC/QA) manager. Responsible for QC/QA engineering for Engineering, new construction, foundations, sewer installations, roadway surfaces Geotechnical and during and after installation, design of de -watering systems, pump � Highway De. ign;Louisiana Technical ' stations, and assessment of soil -related environmental contamination. University, Ruston, LA, Provided geotechnical design recommendations for new construction 1985. for municipal, governmental and commercial projects throughout California. B.S., Civil ' ' Engineering, i Louisiana Technical Specific Project Experience ; University, Ruston, ' Louisiana, 1982 Widening of the 91 Freeway -Orange and Riverside Counties, CA Registrations: Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for materials i California No. C53992 testing and inspection during the widening of the 91 Freeway for Caltrans. (Civil) The widening project included the construction of new lanes on the east and California No. C2784 westbound sides, new retaining walls, bridges, slope stability of cuts, rock ; (Geotechnical) exploration, etc. The testing and inspection services included a review of the Nevada No. 022245 concrete mix designs, concrete testing and inspection, concrete batch plant (Civil) inspection, pile inspection and logging, rebar inspection, aggregate testing, '.. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 welding inspection, subgrade testing and inspection, base material evaluation and testing, compaction testing and inspection, and asphaltic concrete testing. On -Call Soils and Materials Testing and Inspection Services -Orange County Transportation Authority Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for the soil and material testing and inspection services on an on -call basis for any OCTA owned facilities. Various projects were performed at the five maintenance and operations facilities, various transportation centers and park -and -ride facilities owned by the OCTA. AESCO also provided all labor, materials, equipment, and facilities to perform soils and materials testing and inspection services during construction of the various projects. The services included performing required testing of soils, asphalt concrete, masonry, Portland cement concrete, reinforcing steel, and structural steel. In addition, special deputy inspection services for welding, reinforcing steel, masonry, concrete placement, and roofing installation inspection were also performed. 14-Inch Water Line Installation under Huntington Harbor Channel, City of Huntington Beach, CA Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for a geotechnical investigation for a new 14-inch diameter water line composed of High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipe for the City of Huntington Beach. The length of the new pipe ranged from 750 feet to 950 feet. The pipe was installed beneath the Huntington Harbor bottom which is at an approximate depth of 20 feet below high sea level. The water line connected to existing water systems on either side of the channel. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services H q ox e z (e a ,•f www.AescoTech.com AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Design/Build SR-22 Freeway Widening -Garden Grove, CA. Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for the inspection and mix design alternatives and recommendations for the Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) and Lean Concrete Base for the widening and overall improvement for Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) and Caltrans. Mr. Chamaa worked with the design team and the contractor to qualify aggregate testing and evaluation of the concrete and performed on -site mix design trials. Recommended the most appropriate mix design and additives based on California Test methods. Supervised the testing of concrete products during placement which included aggregate testing, concrete cylinders, LCB samples and flexural strength beam tests. Supervised the flexural strength of the concrete during the pavement construction. On -Ramp Widening, Eastbound SR-91 Freeway at Beach Boulevard, Buena Park, CA Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for the geotechnical investigation and materials testing and inspection services for the widening of the Eastbound SR-91 Freeway On - Ramp at Beach Boulevard for the City of Buena Park, a Caltrans oversight project. An environmental investigation and Aerially Deposited Lead study was also performed. Plant No. 1 Sludge Dewatering Project, Fountain Valley, CA Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for the construction materials testing and inspections for the sludge dewatering project at Plant 1 for Orange County Sanitation District. This project was to enhance the use of existing digesters, and replace the existing sludge handling facility. The new dewatering equipment will remove more water from the biosolids than existing facilities, which in turn will reduce the hauling cost to remote sites. Warner Avenue Sinkhole Emergency Response, Huntington Beach, CA. Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for an emergency response to assist the City of Huntington Beach and the County of Orange to investigate the cause of a sinkhole which formed in one of the main thoroughfares within the City of Huntington Beach. The sinkhole was approximately 17 feet by 14 feet and 20 feet in depth. The sinkhole destroyed the existing manhole, water main and multiple sewer line connections. AESCO provided on the spot geotechnical recommendations for the shoring system, dewatering program, and repair mitigation. Ranger Sewer Lift Station No. 16 — City of Huntington Beach Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for the geotechnical investigation and the materials testing and inspection for construction of Ranger Sewer Lift Station No. 16 in the City of Huntington Beach. The new lift station was 24 feet by 24 feet in plan dimension and was placed at a depth of 18 feet below the existing ground surface. Recommendations were made for a mat foundation, dewatering during construction, waterproofing, pipe bedding, lateral pressures, and shoring. Belmont Pool Rebuild -Revitalization -City of Long Beach Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for the geotechnical and Phase II environmental investigation for the new Belmont Pool for the City of Long Beach. The project generally consists of constructing an indoor pool which is approximately 85 feet by 190 feet in plan dimension housed inside an approximately 60, 000 square foot structure. An outdoor pool with a plan dimension of approximately 85 feet by 185 feet will be located just east of the structure. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services b" o f t' d i es g � x e z C c a r www.AescoTech.com z a Nc I k e Ci a 0 u a d Zl rr AESGO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Russell Scharlin Senior Geotechnicol Engineer/Quality Control Manager, P.E., G.E. - - - - - - Russell Scharlin is a senior geotechnical engineer with over 30 years Education: of experience in civil and geotechnical engineering. Primary M.S.. Civil Engineering responsibilities include performing all aspects of construction (Geolechnical), management, geotechnical engineering and environmental studies. University of Mr. Scharlin has provided design and construction management CalijorniaatDavis services related to pavements and foundations for numerous B.S., Civil structures, bridges, pump stations, freeways, tanks, communication Engineering, towers and other structures. University of California at Davis Specific Project Experience 40-hour Health and Safetv Training Seismic Remediation-Elevated Roadway -John Wayne Airport, Santa Ana Registrations: Quality Control Manager: Mr. Scharlin was the Quality Control Manager Geotechnic•al for the seismic retrofit of the bridge structure located at the John Wayne Engineer, State of Airport. The project was for the County of Orange and Caltrans. The California project consisted of installation of 64 steel column casings at select Civil Engineer, Slate of concrete column locations, enlargement of selected foundation pile caps, California installation of new expansion joints at terminal vehicle ramps and (Mr. Scharlin is alsoregistered in seversl walkways, detensioning and retensioning of slab tendons and other .states.) miscellaneous pavement and sidewalk improvements. Also prepared the Construction Quality Control Plan and the Welding Quality Control Plan. Algonquin Lift Station No. 10, Huntington Beach, CA. Quality Control Manager: Mr. Scharlin was the Quality Control Manager for the geotechnical investigation and construction materials testing and inspections for the demolition and replacement of an existing lift station and some of the associated piping with a new lift station located approximately 50 feet south of the existing station for the City of Huntington Beach. The new lift station consisted of a concrete vault with a footprint area of approximately 10 feet by 10 feet and about 30 feet to 35 feet in depth. Sand Canyon Grade Separation -Irvine, CA Quality Control Manager: Mr. Scharlin was the Quality Control Manager for the materials testing and inspections for the Sand Canyon Grade Separation project at the 5 Freeway in Irvine. The project includes the construction of a rail underpass, retaining walls, railroad relocation, storm drains, utility relocations, Sand Canyon Avenue relocation, and a new pump station. Third parties involved in the project include the City of Irvine, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Caltrans, and the Irvine Ranch Water District. Roadway Improvements -Nichols Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA Quality Control Manager: Mr. Scharlin was the Quality Control Manager for the geotechnical investigation for roadway improvements of Nichols Lane for the City of Huntington Beach. Pavement and subgrade recommendations for rehabilitation of the existing pavement were provided for an area which included heavy trash truck traffic. Traffic control plans and traffic control were also performed. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com Eufedeaq 4me4[ea 7'Z0M '7 rc I oCe fd vL ft AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Auto Center Drive/BNSF Railroad Grade Separation -Corona, CA Quality Control Manager: Mr. Scharlin was the Quality Control Manager for the geotechnical and materials testing and inspection services for the project which was for Riverside County Transportation Commission and the City of Corona. The project consists of constructing a four -lane overcrossing at Auto Center/BNSF railroad tracks. Construction required a bypass roadway, associated roadway improvements, retaining walls, storm drain, sewer line, utilities, and CIDH piling foundations. Olinda Landfill -Gas to Energy Facilities —City of Yorba Linda, CA Quality Control Manager: Mr. Scharlin was the Quality Control Manager for construction materials testing and inspection services during construction of the gas to energy facilities at the Brea-Olinda landfill for the City of Yorba Linda and the County of Orange. The facilities included the installation of gas turbines mounted on concrete slabs, a combustion turbine generator, chilled water systems, polishing systems, compressed air systems, a step-up transformer, switch gears, axillary transformers, a main building and control room, trenching and piping, and miscellaneous structures. New access roads were also constructed. Warner Avenue Gravity Sewer Lift Station C — City of Huntington Beach, CA Quality Control Manager: Mr. Scharlin was the Quality Control Manager for the construction materials testing and inspection and for the geotechnical and environmental Phase II investigations for a new lift station facility. The project consisted of the replacement of the existing Lift Stations B and C and the Sunset Beach Sanitary Lift Station with a new Lift Station C. The submersible lift station incorporated a 14 foot by 26 foot by 22 foot deep wet well. The bottom of the well foundation was approximately 26 to 27 feet below existing grade. The new lift station also included an 8-foot deep valve vault which was 15 feet by 10 feet in plan dimension, a 60 kW outdoor generator, and electrical panels. Ranger Sewer Lift Station No. 16 — City of Huntington Beach, CA Geotechnical Engineer: Mr. Scharlin was the Geotechnical Engineer for the geotechnical investigation and the materials testing and inspection for construction of Ranger Sewer Lift Station No. 16 in the City of Huntington Beach. The new lift station was 24 feet by 24 feet in plan dimension and was placed at a depth of 18 feet below the existing ground surface. State College Boulevard Grade Separation -Fullerton, CA Quality Control Manager: Mr. Scharlin is the Quality Control Manager for the replacement of the at - grade railroad crossing by construction an underpass for State College Boulevard beneath the existing BNSF railroad. The City of Fullerton and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) are constructing a vehicle undercrossing at the intersection of State College Boulevard and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway. The roadway will be lowered between Santa Fe Avenue to the north to approximately 500 feet south of Valencia Drive to the south. Construction consists of a temporary railroad shoo -fly, a railroad bridge, retaining walls, a pump station, pavement and utilities reconstruction. AESCO has performed QA inspection and testing for earthwork, foundation installation, concrete, reinforcing steel and pavement reconstruction. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com Fmiede/otq 4me¢eca 7Z�7 aM / 4 e �726 a Kd vLA AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Amer Hazboon Senior Engineer, P.E. Mr. Hazboon has 21 years of professional experience specializing in environmental remediation, feasibility testing and design. He has extensive experience in developing remedial programs for hazardous soil and groundwater, providing design -build services, providing necessary reporting for regulatory compliance, performed methane mitigation and inspection services, and California UST Operator Inspection services. Mr. Hazboon has also served as the Health and Safety officer on numerous projects. Mr. Hazboon's has experience with a wide range of water, wastewater, and storm water management projects, including water quality assessments; water resources development, treatment, and distribution; and wastewater collection, conveyance, treatment, and disposal/reuse including "grey water" system design and construction. Specific Project Experience Olinda Landfill -Gas to Energy Facilities-DCO Energy for County of Orange, Yorba Linda, CA Health and Safety Officer and Environmental Engineer: Mr. Habzoon was the Environmental Engineer for the monitoring of the excavations during grading operations during construction of the gas to energy facility at the Brea-Olinda landfill. Performed the QA/QC during installation of the methane barrier system during construction to maintain compliance with local regulations and design specifications. Observed the installation of the Liquid Boot methane system, the HDPE moisture barrier system, observed the membrane and barrier testing, and testing of the active subsurface methane gas mitigation system. Test results were documented on daily inspection logs and a Final Closeout Report was prepared. Education: ' M.B.A., University of Phoenix, Costa Mesa, CA B.S., Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic ' University, Pomona, CA 40-hour Health and Safety Training Registrations: Civil Engineer, State of California Certifications: ' Registered Deputy Inspector for the City of Los Angeles, Methane Mitigation Systems ' ICC Certified California UST System i Operator ' Certified Liquid Boot Inspector i Certified Tremco Barrier Inspector ' Hazardous Waste Operations and Belmont Pool Rebuild -Revitalization -City of Long Beach ; Emergency Response Environmental Engineer: Mr. Habzoon was the Environmental Engineer for (HAZWOPER) 40 HR ' the Phase II environmental investigation for the new Belmont Pool for the City Training of Long Beach. The project generally consists of constructing an 85 foot by ` - - - - - - 190 foot indoor pool housed inside an approximately 60, 000 square foot structure and an 85 foot by 185 foot outdoor pool. Soil and water samples were tested for hydrocarbons and soils were tested for heavy metals. A study of soil methane gas was also conducted. Van's Skate Park and Retail Structure -City of Huntington Beach Environmental Engineer: Mr. Habzoon was the Environmental Engineer for the Phase II environmental study for the Van's Skate Park and Retail Building in the City of Huntington Beach. Several borings were performed and nested gas probes were installed at depths of 5 feet and 10 feet below grade for methane gas testing. Pressure measurements of 02, CO2 and methane concentrations were recorded. Soil samples were tested for the presence of hydrocarbons, volatiles and heavy metals. Goodyear Tire Facility -Goodyear Tires Environmental Engineer: Mr. Habzoon was the Environmental Engineer for a Phase II environmental investigation at a closed Goodyear tire facility in the City of Anaheim. Soil samples were collected Construction Material Testing/ Inspection S u i E d i K g Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com 7-row % is e Cf s a u �r d V,6 M AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications *W and tested after the removal of eight existing hydraulic lifts. Confirmation sampling and testing was performed to identify if any total petroleum hydrocarbons concentrations exceeded action levels set by the Anaheim Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Section. Pachappa Railroad Bridge-SEMA Construction for Caltrans Environmental Engineer: Mr. Habzoon was the Environmental Engineer for the hazardous waste profiling of railroad ballast and subsurface soil for the Pachappa Bridge project in Cathedral City. Provided field sampling and prepared summary and recommendations report for hazardous waste assessment and management. Soil Berm Installations -Marine Corp Base, Camp Pendleton Environmental Engineer: Mr. Habzoon was the Environmental Engineer for the excavation, relocation, and grading of soil berms at the Maine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. Provided field oversight and reviews, including construction coordination and scheduling. Leaking Underground Storage Tank Remedial Action Plan -Orange County Sanitation Districts Environmental Engineer: Mr. Habzoon was the Environmental Engineer for a feasibility study, corrective action plan, and preparation of a remedial design for leaking UST's at the Auto Shop area of the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Plant No.1 using SVE and GWE for two phase remediation. East Side Redevelopment Zone -City of West Hollywood Environmental Engineer: Mr. Habzoon was the Environmental Engineer for multiple Phase 1 environmental site assessments (ESA's) and environmental compliance activities in support of the redevelopment of the City of West Hollywood's East Side Redevelopment Zone. Industrial uses in the area have included manufacturing, automotive repair, metal plating, gas and electric utilities and dry cleaning facilities, which may have resulted in the contamination of soil and groundwater at certain sites. Provided guidance and potential cleanup options and remedial costs. Watershed Sanitary Survey -Cucamonga Valley Water District Environmental Engineer: Mr. Habzoon was the Environmental Engineer for a Watershed Sanitary Survey (WSS) of local surface water watersheds as required by Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 17, Article 7, of the California Code of Regulations. Performed a comprehensive evaluation of the local surface water from the Day Canyon, East Etiwanda Canyon, and Cucamonga Canyon watersheds. This evaluation included extensive reviews and analyses of water pipelines, connections, storage systems, pump stations, treatment facilities, and other associated infrastructure. West Riverside Landfill -Riverside County Department of Waste Resource Environmental Engineer: Mr. Habzoon was the Environmental Engineer for the retrofit and the gas collection system at the West Riverside Landfill. The project involves the removal, relocation, and retrofitting of existing utilities, gas collection components, and associated underground infrastructure. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services I 'G u[ e d (a g it e z C e a www.AescoTech.com z o "c 7l e 57 z a u of W V rr I� AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Debra Perez Project Manager Debra Perez has been a project manager for various geotechnical and ------------------ environmental engineering projects for over 30 years. Ms. Perez has i Education: been project manager for a variety of projects including construction of i Civil Engineering, new above ground oil storage tanks for ARCO, City of Lynwood Senior , Graduate Studies , Center, new natural gas pipelines and steam generating facilities for ; Program, Southern California Edison, several freeway and road projects including California State University, Long , new embankment fills, new bridges, grade separations, pavement Beach, California design and survey of existing road conditions, and new telecommunications facilities throughout California. Ms. Perez' B. S, Renewable experience includes hazardous waste investigations, supervision of the Natural Resources, University of soils laboratory and preparing reports for compaction, preliminary soil California, Davis, 1978 investigation, distress investigation, and slope repair projects. Specific Project Experience Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B, Azusa to Montclair, Los Angeles County, CA Project Manager: Ms. Perez was the Project Manager for the geotechnical investigation for drainage and road crossings for the Gold Line Foothill Extension Azusa to Montclair project for the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The project follows the right-of-way (ROW) of the old Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway's Second Division through the Foothill Cities. Belmont Pool Rebuild -Revitalization, City of Long Beach, CA Project Manager: Ms. Perez was the Project Manager for a geotechnical and Phase II environmental investigation for the new Belmont Pool for the City of Long Beach. The project generally consists of constructing an indoor pool which is approximately 85 feet by 190 feet in plan dimension housed inside an approximately 60, 000 square foot structure. The structure will include a second -story banquet facility, locker rooms, restrooms, pool storage, offices and a basement level mechanical room. An outdoor pool with a plan dimension of approximately 85 feet by 185 feet will be located just east of the structure. There will also be a restaurant near the southwest side of the structure. Two small pools will also be constructed; a teaching pool just south of the indoor pool and an outdoor recreation pool just south of the outdoor pool. Soil samples were collected and tested for hydrocarbon, heavy metals, volatile organics, and BTEX. Water samples were collected and tested for the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons and motor oil. Geotechncial recommendations were provided for prestressed concrete piles and drilled pier foundations. Recommendations for shallow foundations were also provided. Recommendations were also provided for a basement structure including shoring and excavation. Sewer Lift Station Replacement Project -Algonquin Lift Station No. 10, Huntington Beach Project Manager: Ms. Perez was the Project Manager for the geotechnical investigation and construction materials testing and inspections for the demolition and replacement of an existing lift station and some of the associated piping with a new lift station located approximately 50 feet south of the existing station. The new lift station consisted of a concrete vault with a footprint area of approximately 10 feet by 10 feet and about 30 feet to 35 feet in depth. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services 5 u C e d i a y � x e x! e a , www.AescoTech.com AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Ranger Sewer Lift Station No. 16-City of Huntington Beach Project Manager: Ms. Perez was the Project Manager for the geotechnical investigation and the materials testing and inspection for construction of Ranger Sewer Lift Station No. 16 for the City of Huntington Beach. The new lift station was 24 feet by 24 feet in plan dimension and was placed at a depth of 18 feet below the existing ground surface. Recommendations were made for a mat foundation, dewatering during construction, waterproofing, pipe bedding, lateral pressures, and shoring. Auto Center Drive/BNSF Railroad Grade Separation, Corona, CA Project Manager: Ms. Perez was the Project Manager for the geotechnical and materials testing and inspections for the Auto Center Drive grade separation project for the City of Corona and Riverside County Transportation Commission. The project consisted of constructing a four -lane overcrossing at Auto Center/BNSF railroad tracks. Construction required a bypass roadway, other roadway improvements, retaining walls, utilities and CIDH piling foundations. On -Ramp Widening, Eastbound SR-91 Freeway at Beach Boulevard, Buena Park, CA Project Manager: Ms. Perez was the Project Manager for the geotechnical investigation and materials testing and inspection services for the widening of the Eastbound SR-91 Freeway On -Ramp at Beach Boulevard for the City of Buena Park, a Caltrans oversight project. An environmental investigation and Aerially Deposited Lead study was also performed. State College Boulevard Grade Separation, Fullerton, CA Project Manager: Ms. Perez was the Project Manager for the replacement of the at -grade railroad crossing by construction an underpass at State College Boulevard beneath the existing BNSF railroad for the City of Fullerton. Construction consists of a temporary railroad shoo -fly, a railroad bridge, retaining walls, a pump station, pavement and utilities reconstruction. Lambert Park — City of Huntington Beach, Department of Public Works Project Manager: Ms. Perez was the Project Manager for a geotechnical investigation for a repair of a failing slope at the existing park. The slope is 40 feet high and inclined at 1.5:1 (H:V). The investigation included logging and sampling of several borings, laboratory testing, slope stability analyses, and a seismic and geologic review. AESCO provided recommendations for slope repair including reconstructing the base of the slope in 10-foot wide sections. A buttressing wedge was placed at the toe of the slope using compacted crushed aggregate base and keyed 3 feet into the underlying native soils. Above the wedge, horizontal geotextile strips were placed at the surface of the existing slope to reinforce the surficial soils. AESCO monitored the construction activities during the slope repair. Warner Avenue Gravity Sewer Lift Station C, Huntington Beach, CA Project Manager: Ms. Perez was the Project Manager for the construction materials testing and inspection and the geotechnical and environmental Phase II investigations for a new lift station facility for the City of Huntington Beach. The project consisted of the replacement of the existing Lift Stations B and C and the Sunset Beach Sanitary Lift Station with a new Lift Station C. The submersible lift station incorporated a 14 foot by 26 foot by 22 foot deep wet well. The bottom of the well foundation was approximately 26 to 27 feet below existing grade. The new lift station also included an 8-foot deep valve vault which was 15 feet by 10 feet in plan dimension, a 60 kW outdoor generator, and electrical panels. The sewer installation was installed over a distance of 1 mile. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services u C f d c e g fI He e a l c a www.AescoTech.com AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Duane Wentworth Senior Inspector Mr. Duane Wentworth has over 40 years of experience in Public Works Education: Construction and has managed a variety of civil works projects, programs, Universitroj and contracts, which required organization and administrative skills as California, Berkelev well as professional and/or technical quality control knowledge. Mr. Extension. Certificate for Wentworth has overseen and coordinated Caltrans approved Quality Construction Assurance Programs (QAP) for numerous State and Federal Projects as a Inspection of Traffic Contract Administrator for the City of Huntington Beach. This involved Signals and scheduling, tracking and documenting all activities related to Highway Lighting Systems construction, progress payments and labor compliance. Mr. Wentworth has also conducted electrical inspections as part of his duties as a public California State works inspector for the City of Huntington Beach. University, Long Beach. Major: Mechanical Areas of expertise include evaluating bids, overseeing construction Engineering activities for the City and outside agency projects to ensure compliance with plans and specifications; this included monitoring schedules and Orange Coast College. A.A. budgets; preparing estimates and evaluating change orders, conducting Engineering negotiations, resolving problems, on -site inspections, approving progress payments and other disbursements, coordinating contract administration Professional Certifications: activities with consultants and various agencies, developing and Caltrans Resident maintaining a system for monitoring the progress of projects and EngineersAcademv. as assigned, evaluating consequences of changes and advise, Asphaltprograms from the Asphalt from AsphMateralt preparing written technical and statistical reports, prepares l,,,rltate reimbursement reports for various funding agencies, monitoring projects -------------' for adherence to Federal and State labor laws. Specific Project Experience Trinidad Lift Station -City of Huntington Beach Senior Inspector and Quality Control Supervisor: Mr. Wentworth was the Senior Inspector and Quality Control Supervisor for the quality assurance inspection and materials testing services for replacement of the existing Trinidad Lift Station No. 29 on Trinidad Lane, installation of a sewer force main on Trinidad Lane, north of Aquarius Drive, restoration of existing public and private improvements, and asphalt pavement removal and replacement for the City of Huntington Beach. Mr. Wentworth performed inspection of all phases of traffic signal construction including poles and foundations, duct work, electrical supply and metering, safety lighting, vehicle detection (loop detectors and video), conductors, and controller installation and testing. Orangethorpe Avenue Grade Separation Project- Stantec/OCTA Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manager: Mr. Wentworth was the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manager for the Orangethorpe Avenue Grade Separation Project located in Anaheim, California. This overcrossing project consisted of construction of a roadway bridge over Orangethorpe Avenue, while preserving the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) mainline tracks at existing grade. The project also included various roadway improvements, retaining walls, utilities, Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services y www.AescoTech.com 7 z o m '7 4 e Cj z o u a d V k AESCO AESW Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications and CIDH piling foundations as well as two additional structures for Chapman Avenue and Miller Street to connect to the elevated Orangethorpe Avenue. Responsibilities included scheduling quality assurance (CIA) inspections to achieve compliance with the contract documents, plans, and specifications on all phases of construction inspection of paving, structures, grading, drainage, sewer, water, utility relocation, electrical installation, sign installation, and landscaping items. Verified implementation and enforced the quality control (QC) inspection and material requirements in accordance with the contract documents and contractor quality control program (CQCP). Conducted oversight of CIA testing and inspection when performed by independent assurance testers, prepared daily status reports for the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Ranger Sewer Lift Station No. 16 — City of Huntington Beach Electrical Inspector: Mr. Wentworth was the Electrical Inspector during construction of Ranger Sewer Lift Station No. 16 in the City of Huntington Beach. The new lift station was 24 feet by 24 feet in plan dimension and was placed at a depth of 18 feet below the existing ground surface. Recommendations were made for a mat foundation, dewatering during construction, waterproofing, pipe bedding, lateral pressures, and shoring. Inspected all phases of construction for multiple sewer lift stations including excavation and shoring, gravity and force main construction, structural concrete, pumps and Inspected related electrical items, including the 240v 3-phase electrical supply and metering, transformers, proper grounding and bonding of all electrical systems, automated controls and sensors, telemetry, standby generator systems, and temporary pump and bypass systems. Warner Avenue Sinkhole Emergency Response -City of Huntington Beach and County of Orange Electrical Inspector: Mr. Wentworth was the Electrical Inspector for an emergency response to assist the City of Huntington Beach to investigate the cause of a sinkhole which formed in one of the main thoroughfares within the City. The sinkhole was approximately 17 feet by 14 feet and 20 feet in depth. The sinkhole destroyed the existing manhole, water main and multiple sewer line connections. AESCO provided on the spot geotechnical recommendations for the shoring system, dewatering program, and repair mitigation. Inspected all phases of construction for multiple sewer lift stations including excavation and shoring, gravity and force main construction, structural concrete, pumps Inspected related electrical items, including the temporary electrical supply and temporary pump and bypass systems. Beach Boulevard Water Main Extension Project -City of Huntington Beach and Caltrans Senior Inspector: Mr. Wentworth was the Senior Inspector for a 1500 foot extension of a water main on Eastbound Beach Boulevard between South Warner Avenue and Robidoux Drive and West Beach Boulevard to East Beach Boulevard at Holt in the Caltrans right-of-way. The testing and inspections included the placement of all structural fill and backfill, concrete testing and inspection, subgrade and aggregate base placement and compaction, asphalt paving construction (base and surface layers), rubber asphaltic concrete, slurry backfill, and inspection of ductile iron and pvc water lines, valves, fittings and the existing lines connections. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection E u i F d i a y 4w e -tic a Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com a 6 M *7 s e 5i a a u x d Zf AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications David J. Ryan Senior Engineer, P.E. Registered civil engineer with over 40 years of experience as materials iCivil Enngigi neering, � testing, special inspection services manager. Responsible for laboratory University of Illinois, and field testing services on materials such as concrete, soils, Champaign -Urbana, aggregates, reinforcing steel, structural steel, high strength bolting and 1973 welded structures. Registrations: California No. C49661 � Specific Project Experience (Civil) Beach Boulevard Water Main Extension Project -City of Huntington Beach and Caltrans --------------- Senior Inspector: Mr. Wentworth was the Senior Inspector for a 1500 foot extension of a water main on Eastbound Beach Boulevard between South Warner Avenue and Robidoux Drive and West Beach Boulevard to East Beach Boulevard at Holt in the Caltrans right-of- way. The testing and inspections included the placement of all structural fill and backfill, concrete testing and inspection, subgrade and aggregate base placement and compaction, asphalt paving construction (base and surface layers), rubber asphaltic concrete, slurry backfill, and inspection of ductile iron and pvc water lines, valves, fittings and the existing lines connections. Village at Westfield/Topanga Retail Mall, Canoga Park, CA Senior Engineer: Mr. Ryan was the Senior Engineer for materials testing and inspection during expansion of the existing mall for Westfield Property LLC. The project included a parking garage, a new Costco Retail store and a tri-level mall retail area. Testing and inspection included concrete batch plant, concrete piles and logging, rebar, structural steel, masonry, fireproofing high strength bolting, aggregate, welding, mass grading, utility excavations, footing inspections, subgrade, base material evaluation, compaction, and asphaltic concrete. Long Beach Main Pumping Plant, Los Angeles County Sanitation District, Long Beach, CA Senior Engineer: Mr. Ryan was the Senior Engineer for the quality control inspection and materials testing and geotechnical engineering services for the contractor for the Los Angeles County Sanitation District for the New Main Pumping Plant. The project involved a 50-foot wet well next to the existing plant along the 710 Freeway, adjacent to the Port of Long Beach. Forty separate structural concrete pours were performed below grade which required mass concrete -thermal control. Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement, Port of Long Beach, CA Laboratory Quality Control Manager: Mr. Ryan was the Laboratory Quality Control Manager for production testing of all reinforcing steel splices in accordance with Caltrans procedures for the replacement of the existing bridge. Sampling and testing were performed for rebar welded hoops, couplers, and reinforcing bars during construction of the foundations for the new bridge. Lakeview Avenue Grade Separation, Anaheim and Yorba Linda, CA Senior Engineer: Mr. Ryan was the Senior Engineer for preparation of the QC/QA manual and supervised materials testing and inspection during construction of a new railroad grade separation at the BNSF track. The project included railroad bridges, retaining walls, depressed roadways, utility relocations, roadway bridges, channel walls and drainage ditches. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services b u[ f d C K g ri e z C e a www.AescoTech.com z a % e Cl z o u a d ZC PAESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Design/Build Modernization for Terminal 1, Redevelopment Program for Terminal 7 and Modernization of Terminal 6, Los Angeles World Airport for the City of Los Angeles, CA Senior Engineer: Mr. Ryan was the Engineering Manager for the special inspection and testing for three design/build projects at terminals 1, 6 and 7 for Southwest and United Airlines and for Westfield Properties. The scope of work included testing of the subgrade, base and concrete pavement for aprons, and asphaltic concrete tests on the areas between taxiways and utility trenches on the operation areas of the airport. Inside the terminals, concrete, masonry, fireproofing, structural steel with high strength bolting and welding special inspections were provided on a 24/7 basis during construction to seismically upgrade the 45 year old structures. Supervised a work force of eight inspectors working 2 shifts per day which was required to complete the project while keeping the terminals open. Indian Springs Athletic Complex, San Bernardino County, CA Senior Engineer: Mr. Ryan supervised and reviewed the geotechnical recommendations for foundation design for the proposed stadium, running track, field and aquatics center structures and masonry side walls for the San Bernardino Unified School District. Mr. Ryan also supervised the caisson and footing installations, offsite fabrication of the stadium and construction of the pools. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services Fa C E d i n g ,+1 Hf e z C e a www.AescoTech.com 4 C Of 7 4 e C z a u'f d V k AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Andrew Stone Project Geologist, G G., C. E. G. Mr. Stone's experience spans over 27 years of engineering geology and --------------------- project management and covers a wide variety of engineering geology Education: projects. He has worked successfully for and with industrial, residential B.S., Geology, and commercial developers, master community planners, design California State engineers and governmental agencies. He has extensive experience in University, Los all aspects of engineering geology. ;Angeles, 1982 Specific Project Experience Post -Graduate Studies in Geology, California State University, Los Foothill Transport Corridor, Orange County, CA Angeles Project Geologist: Mr. Stone was the Project Geologist for alignment feasibility studies from San Clemente to Rancho Santa Margarita through Registrations: C'u/ifornia IVo. 5166 highly varied geologic structure and numerous large ancient landslides. (Geologist) California No. 1648 Antonio Parkway San Juan Creek, Orange County, CA (Engineering Project Geologist: Mr. Stone was the Project Geologist for a subsurface Geologist) investigation and geotechnical construction monitoring for driven -pile supported 800-foot span bridge crossing San Juan Creek in San Juan Capistrano. Student Housing, California State University, Los Angeles, CA Project Geologist: Mr. Stone was the Project Geologist for a subsurface investigation for renovation project of on -site student housing in complexly folded Monterey Formation. Muddy Canyon Dam, Orange County, CA Project Geologist: Mr. Stone was the Project Geologist for the sighting and foundation investigation for the proposed Muddy Canyon Dam adjacent Crystal Cove State Park. Cooperative effort with D.S.O.D. geotechnical staff was instrumental in gaining project approval. Santa Margarita Water District, Santa Margarita, CA Project Geologist: Mr. Stone was the Project Geologist for several sighting studies, geologic investigations and construction monitoring for SMWD tank sites, dams, lift stations and pipeline projects throughout the south Orange County area. Calico Solar Plant Access Bridge, Barstow, CA Project Geologist: Mr. Stone was the Project Geologist for the geotechnical investigation for foundation design for the Calico Solar Plant Access Bridge in the Barstow area of San Bernardino County. The project consisted of the bridge structure and retaining walls for the BNSF railroad. SurfCam Building Slope Stabilization, San Onofre, CA Project Geologist: Mr. Stone was the Project Geologist for the slope stabilization project in San Onofre, CA. Observed production drilling and installation of tieback anchors, verifying minimum target depths; recorded and plotted data generated during proof, performance and extended creep testing for each anchor tendon; prepared formal report summarizing drilling, installation and test results of the anchor stressing. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection l' Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services a g c u i C d 1 K g fI Nc e a C c a www.AescoTech.com e t AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Widening of the 91 Freeway, Orange and Riverside Counties, CA Project Geologist: Mr. Stone was the Project Geologist for the geologic assessment for retaining walls constructed as part of the freeway widening. The widening project included the construction of new lanes on the east and westbound sides, new retaining walls, bridges, etc. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection r�ac e a i c a Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com ¢ a w % 4 e C,r a a o d Zt k I� AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Omar Chamaa - - - - - -, Inspector and Field Engineer, E.I.T. Education: Mr. Omar Chamaa has over 11 years of experience in the field and in ; California State Gniversitp, Long laboratory testing and inspection of construction materials such as Beach. B.S. Civil concrete, steel, anchors, soils and grading. Mr. Chamaa, performed Engineering, 2009. ; construction materials testing and inspections for multiple Caltrans and OCTA projects, which included bridges, roadways, utilities, foundations, Professional j Certifications: , pipeline installations, lift stations and retaining wall construction. Mr. ; EIT Chamaa was responsible for construction material approval, such as: select ICC Certified fill, foundation excavation, slope cut, steel installation, and concrete mix Concrete Inspector design for various projects. He attended construction meetings to discuss Cal Trans � Certif sate of material approvals, deficiencies, modifications, as well as providing final Proficiency, observation reports to the client. ; Flexural Strength of PCC, Grading, Specific Project Experience Compressive , Strength, Concrete ' Curing, Making , Warner Avenue Gravity Sewer Lift Station C, Huntington Beach, CA Beams, Rapid Set Inspector: Mr. Chamaa was the Inspector for the construction materials testing ; Concrete, etc. and inspection and the geotechnical and environmental Phase II investigations for ; City of Newport a new lift station facility for the City of Huntington Beach. The project consisted Beach Registered of the replacement of the existing Lift Stations B and C and the Sunset Beach Deputy Building , Inspector Sanitary Lift Station with a new Lift Station C. The submersible lift station ; City of Garden incorporated a 14 foot by 26 foot by 22 foot deep wet well. The bottom of the Grove Registered well foundation was approximately 26 to 27 feet below existing grade. The new Deputy Building ; lift station also included an 8-foot deep valve vault which was 15 feet by 10 feet Inspector in plan dimension, a 60 kW outdoor generator, and electrical panels. The sewer ; ACI Certified, installation was installed over a distance of 1 mile. i Concrete Field ; Testing Technician ' ACI Certified, Sand Canyon Grade Separation, Irvine, CA Concrete Inspector: Mr. Chamaa was the Inspector for the materials testing and ; Laboratory Testing inspections for the Sand Canyon Grade Separation project at the 5 Freeway in ; Technician Irvine. The project includes the construction of a rail underpass, retaining walls, City of Long railroad relocation, storm drains, utility relocations, Sand Canyon Avenue Beach Registered , Deputy building ; relocation, and a new pump station. Third parties involved in the project include ; Inspector the City of Irvine, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Caltrans, and City of Riverside the Irvine Ranch Water District. Registered Deputy ; Inspector Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project, Riverside County, CA ; Certified Radiation Inspector: Mr. Chamaa was the Inspector for the quality control inspection and Safety and Nuclear Gage Operator materials testing services. The project involves a 24-mile extension of the existing - - - - - - - - - - - - 512-mile Metrolink commuter rail system. Testing and Inspection services are being provided for the track, grade crossings, structures, railroad stations (Riverside Hunter Park Station, Moreno Valley/March Field Station, Downtown Perris Station and South Perris Station) and the layover facility. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com AVAPS=o AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications First Street Bridge Replacement, City of Santa Ana, CA Inspector: Mr. Chamaa was the Inspector for the construction materials testing and inspections during the replacement of the bridge. Geotechnical services consisted of pile driving parameters evaluation and selection of fill materials. Testing and inspections were conducted on piles, welding, structural steel, precast concrete, concrete, asphalt, mix designs, etc. State College Boulevard Grade Separation, Fullerton, CA Inspector: Mr. Chamaa was the Inspector for the replacement of the at -grade railroad crossing by construction an underpass for State College Boulevard beneath the existing BNSF railroad. The City of Fullerton and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) are constructing a vehicle undercrossing at the intersection of State College Boulevard and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway. The roadway will be lowered between Santa Fe Avenue to the north to approximately 500 feet south of Valencia Drive to the south. Construction consists of a temporary railroad shoo -fly, a railroad bridge, retaining walls, a pump station, pavement and utilities reconstruction. AESCO has performed QA inspection and testing for earthwork, foundation installation, concrete, reinforcing steel and pavement reconstruction. Sewer Lift Station Replacement Project, Algonquin Lift Station No. 10, Huntington Beach, CA Inspector: Mr. Chamaa was the Inspector for the geotechnical investigation and construction materials testing and inspections for the demolition and replacement of an existing lift station and some of the associated piping with a new lift station located approximately 50 feet south of the existing station. The new lift station consisted of a concrete vault with a footprint area of approximately 10 feet by 10 feet and about 30 feet to 35 feet in depth. Ranger Sewer Lift Station No. 16, City of Huntington Beach, CA Inspector: Mr. Chamaa was the Inspector for the geotechnical investigation and the materials testing and inspection for construction of Ranger Sewer Lift Station No. 16 in the City of Huntington Beach. The new lift station was 24 feet by 24 feet in plan dimension and was placed at a depth of 18 feet below the existing ground surface. Broadcom Headquarters, Irvine, CA Inspector: Mr. Chamaa was the Inspector and Quality Control Manager for the two bridge structures during the first phase of construction. One bridge on the north side has two lanes, two sidewalks and planters and is for access to the new structures. This bridge is approximately 180 feet by 90 feet in plan dimension. The second bridge consists of a pedestrian plaza with a fire lane access and is approximately 450 feet by 150 feet in plan dimension. Marine Way will extend beneath the bridge allowing access to the Great Park in Irvine. Materials testing and inspections consisted of reinforcing steel and concrete for footings, columns, retaining walls, bridge deck, approach slabs, wing walls, Caltrans barrier rails, and Caltrans sidewalks. Pile caps, post -tensioning for the foundations and slabs were also inspected as well as the electrical layouts, falsework for the bridge deck and concrete forms. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services u C f d C Of y r� e x C c a www.AescoTech.com ¢ 0 H: %! AESCO Giovanni Mikhael Inspector Mr. Mikhael, has over 11 yea construction materials testing masonry, steel, anchors, soils, performing compaction testing, inspection and testing. Specific Project Experience AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement. of Qualifications rs of experience in the field and in and inspection services for concrete, and grading. He is experienced in foundation inspections and subgrade Widening of the 91 Freeway, Orange and Riverside Counties, CA Inspector: Mr. Mikhael was the Inspector for the materials testing and inspection during the widening of the 91 Freeway. The widening project includes the construction of new lanes on the east and westbound sides, new retaining walls, bridges, etc. The testing and inspection services included a review of the concrete mix designs, concrete testing and inspection, concrete batch plant inspection, pile inspection and logging, rebar inspection, aggregate testing, welding inspection, subgrade testing and inspection, base material evaluation and testing, compaction testing and inspection, retaining wall footings, rapid set concrete, masonry, MSE backfill, and asphaltic concrete testing. Sand Canyon Grade Separation, OCTA/Caltrans, CA Inspector: Mr. Mikhael was the Inspector for the Sand Canyon Grade Separation project at the 5 Freeway in Irvine. The project includes the construction of a rail underpass, retaining walls, railroad relocation, storm drains, utility relocations, Sand Canyon Avenue relocation, and a new pump station. Mr. Mikhael performed inspection and testing of the compaction, asphalt, subgrade, structural backfill, and foundation excavations. Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project-AMES Construction for Riverside County Transportation Commission Inspector: Mr. Mikhael was the Inspector for the quality control inspection and materials testing services for the Perris Valley Line Extension Rail Project in Riverside County, CA. The project involves a 22-mile extension of the existing 512-mile Metrolink commuter rail system. Testing and Inspection services including compaction, asphalt, structural backfill, concrete batch plant inspection are being provided for the track, grade crossings, structures, railroad stations (Riverside Hunter Park Station, Moreno Valley/March Field Station, Downtown Perris Station and South Perris Station) and the layover facility. Mr. Mikhael performed inspection and testing of compaction, asphalt, structural backfill, and concrete batch plant inspection. -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Education: B.A., Business, Devn, University, in progress Professional Certifications: County of Los Angeles Certified Deputy Inspector masonry County of Los Angeles Certified Deputy Inspector concrete ICC Structural Masonry Certified Inspector ICC Reinforced Concrete Certified Inspector ACl Certified, Concrete Field Testing Technician Certified Radiation Safety and Nuclear Gage Operator Caltrans Certificate of Proficiency for: Air Content, Freshly M&ed Concrete, Pressure, Density of Fresh Concrete, Flerural Strength of PCC (Fabrication only), Ball Penetration in Fresh Portland Cement Concrete, Sampling Freshly MLred Concrete, PCC Cylinder Fabrication, Slump of Fresh Portland Cement Concrete, Temperature of Freshly Mixed Portland Cement Concrete TWIG ford Newport Force Main Rehabilitation, Orange County Sanitation District, CA Inspector: Mr. Mikhael was the Inspector for the construction materials testing and inspections for the rehabilitation of the Newport Force Main located on West Coast Highway between Dover Drive to 61st Street in Newport Beach. There are two force mains on both sides of the street. Testing and Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services 5 u c e d C t y r{ He e¢ l e a www.AescoTech.com ¢ a cx % is e 57 x a u er d Zl �i AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications AESCO inspections included compaction and density testing of asphalt and subgrade and concrete testing and inspections. Inspections and testing of compaction and density testing of asphalt pavement, and subgrade and concrete testing and inspections were performed. Warner Avenue Sinkhole Emergency Response, City of Huntington Beach and County of Orange, CA Inspector: Mr. Mikhael was the Inspector for an emergency response to assist the City of Huntington Beach to investigate the cause of a sinkhole which formed in one of the main thoroughfares within the City. The sinkhole was approximately 17 feet by 14 feet and 20 feet in depth. The sinkhole destroyed the existing manhole, water main and multiple sewer line connections. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services u e f d 1 Of y ,*Fosr e z C c a www.AescoTech.com z c H 7 4 e C z c u I� AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Tariq Abdullah Laboratory Supervisor Mr. Tariq Abdullah has over 15 years of experience in the field and in Education: laboratory testing of construction materials such as concrete, steel, asphalt, Karachi Universin,, and soils. Tariq is experienced in conduction testing in accordance with Pakistan. B.S. ASTM, AASHTO and Caltrans. Mr. Abdullah is proficient in conducting sieve Geologic Science, analysis, testing of asphalt concrete using Marshall Max, specific gravity 1988. (Rice), ignition method for extraction/gradation, flow stability and moisture Professional content from microwave oven methods. He is adept in the use of Hveem Certifications. - method for stability and paraffin max density for specific gravity at 25 ACI degrees Celsius. Tariq has also tested and fabricated concrete cylinders, Caltrans mortars, prisms, masonry cores and grout samples to determine concrete NICET ---------- strength through use of the compressive strength machine; and is proficient in the laboratory testing of soil including moisture content, plasticity index, expansion, particle size analysis, R-Value, direct shear, consolidation, etc. Mr. Abdullah is also experienced in the testing and inspection of soil and asphalt during grading. Specific Project Experience Roadway Construction at Pacific Coast Highway and Alameda, Long Beach, CA Laboratory Supervisor: Mr. Abdullah performed laboratory testing including wet density tests in accordance with Caltrans 216 test for roadway construction at Pacific Coast Highway and Alameda in Long Beach. Widening of Taxiway D, Bob hope Airport, CA Laboratory Technician: Mr. Abdullah performed laboratory testing for the widening of Taxiway D at Bob Hope Airport, Burbank. Testing included asphalt flow and stability (Marshall and Hveem), maximum specific gravity (Rice), bitumen extraction, bulk specific gravity, percent air voids, core density, asphalt extraction, R-value. Street Rehabilitation, Anaheim, CA Laboratory Supervisor: Mr. Abdullah performed laboratory testing of asphalt, base and Portland cement concrete for City of Anaheim street projects in accordance with Caltrans procedures. Repavement of the 710 Freeway, Los Angeles County, CA Laboratory Supervisor: Mr. Abdullah performed laboratory testing of asphalt for the 1-710 repaving project in accordance with Caltrans procedures. Testing included asphalt flow and stability (Marshall and Hveem), maximum specific gravity (Rice), bitumen extraction, bulk specific gravity, percent air voids, core density, asphalt extraction, R-value. 1-5 Freeway Widening, Los Angeles County, CA Laboratory Supervisor: Mr. Abdullah performed laboratory testing of asphalt, concrete, and backfill for the 1-5 Freeway widening and relocation at Alondra for Caltrans. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services 'b u[ e d[ e z C c a K y rf www.AescoTech.com 7 z a W % fi e C! z o u a d Zf k AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Kay Alabed -------------- Program Manager Kay is the founder and president of AESCO Inc. She established the Education: company in 1994 in Baton Rouge, Louisiana as a drilling company, which B.S., Dental grew to a full-scale engineering firm. Kay serves as office manager and is Medicine, Damascus in charge of the company's daily operations such as marketing, proposal University, 1990. preparation, project scheduling, client relationships and accounting. She Professional has written numerous computer software programs for the organization Certifications: ; and operation of the firm. Kay also has a medical degree in Dentistry and Hazardous Waste Operations OsHA's her medical knowledge and experience enables her to serve as the standard Training company's health and safety officer. Kay prepared AESCO's Health and Certificate Safety Manual, Quality Assurance Program, and oversees the operating Radiation Safety officer and Nuclear procedures for AESCO's nuclear density gauges. She also schedules and Gauge Certified budgets many of AESCO's projects. She has been responsible for coordinating and scheduling a variety of projects such as: freeway, grade separations, commercial, dam sites, gasoline service stations, and solid waste sanitary landfill sites. Specific Project Experience Sand Canyon Grade Separation, Irvine, CA Project Coordinator: Ms. Alabed was the Project Coordinator for the Sand Canyon Grade Separation project in Irvine for the Orange County Transportation Authority/Caltrans. The project included a railroad shoo -fly and new railroad bridge and CIDH foundations, retaining walls, shoring, pavement, utility installation, a pump station and building construction. Perris Valley Line Commuter Rail Extension Project, Perris, CA Project Coordinator: Ms. Alabed was the Project Coordinator for the quality control inspection and materials testing services for the Perris Valley Line Extension Rail Project AMES Construction for the Riverside County Transportation Commission. The project involves a 22-mile extension of the existing 512-mile Metrolink commuter rail system and stations. Auto Center Drive/BNSF Railroad Grade Separation, Corona, CA Project Coordinator: Ms. Alabed was the Project Coordinator for the geotechnical and materials testing and inspections for the Auto Center Drive grade separation project for the City of Corona and the Riverside County Transportation Commission. The project consisted of constructing a four -lane overcrossing at Auto Center/BNSF railroad tracks. Construction required a bypass roadway, other roadway improvements, retaining walls, utilities and CIDH piling foundations. Soundwalls for the 210 Freeway, Los Angeles County, CA Project Coordinator: Ms. Alabed was the Project Coordinator for the geotechnical investigation for new soundwalls on the 210 Freeway for Caltrans. The project included logging and classification of soil borings, laboratory testing and foundation design recommendations for new bridge and retaining structures and soundwalls. A geologic seismic hazards screening was also performed. Research was conducted on existing geotechnical and geologic reports. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection b"u C e d C a 9 e Z[ 6 a Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com ¢ a W 74 e Cis 0 u a d V /z AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Professional Ruben Rocha Certifications: Inspector , ACI Concrete Field Mr. Ruben Rocha has over 12 years of experience in the field Testing Technician - Grade I ' performing testing and inspection of construction materials such as ACI Concrete concrete, steel, anchors, soils and grading. Mr. Rocha, performed Laboratory Testing construction materials testing and inspections for multiple Caltrans Technician- Gradel Hazardous Waste , and OCTA projects, which included bridges, roadways, utilities, Operation foundations, pipeline installations, lift stations and retaining wall Radiation Safety construction. ; and Use of Nuclear , Gage ' , Specific Project Experience Hazardous Materials 40-hour Training ' Trinidad Lift Station, City of Huntington Beach, CA Caltrans Certificate Inspector: Mr. Rocha was the Inspector for the inspection and materials ; 2fProfciencyfor: testing services for replacement of the existing Trinidad Lift Station No. 29 Calculations on Trinidad Lane, installation of a sewer force main on Trinidad Lane, north Pertaining to Gradings A SpG, of Aquarius Drive, restoration of existing public and private improvements, Sampling Highway and asphalt pavement removal and replacement. Materials A � Products, Soil A Pier G, Berths G230-G236 Terminal Redevelopment North Slip Backlands Aggregate Sample Development, Port of Long Beach, CA Preparation, Sieve Inspector: Mr. Rocha was the Inspector for the construction inspection and AnalysisCoarse Agggregagrega & � of ne tes, � materials testing for the redevelopment of Berths G230-G236 at Pier G, Sand Equivalent, Port of Long Beach. The new construction consists of a marine operations Air Content, ' building, substation housing, waterline and storm drain installations, reefer Freshly Mixed system installation, electrical/communication duct banks, substation Concrete, Pressure, installation, grading, paving, soil handling and disposal, and demolition of Density of Fresh existing structures. Inspection and testing included compaction of grading, Concrete, Flexural Strength of PCC , asphaltic concrete, subgrade, rebar, reinforcing steel, anchor bolts, torque (Fabrication Only), bolts, shear bolts, and epoxy anchor. Ball Penetration in Fresh Portland Various School Improvement Projects -Los Angeles Unified School District Cement Concrete, Inspector: Mr. Rocha was the Inspector for the construction materials Sampling Freshly testing and inspections for the improvements at various grade school, Mined Concrete, PCC Cylinder middle school and high school campuses throughout the LAUSD. Mr. Rocha Fabrication, Slump performed testing and inspections including lightweight concrete, rebar, of Fresh Portland ' anchor bolts, compaction, mechanical anchors, epoxy, grout, mortar, pull Cement Concrete, tests on existing anchors, and pachometer testing. Temperature of Freshly Mixed 1-5 Widening and Realignment Project, Santa Fe Springs, CA Portland Cement Concrete Inspector: Mr. Rocha was the Inspector for the materials testing and inspection during the widening and realignment of the 1-5 Freeway _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ between Valley View Avenue to just north of Marquardt Avenue in the City of Santa Fe Springs for Caltrans. The widening project includes the reconstruction of a new overcrossing and retaining walls. AESCO is performing the testing and inspection services for the lean concrete base (LCB) and jointed plane concrete for rapid set and regular concrete. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services S" ul c a [ f d C a q r� cx e z www.AescoTech.com z a cx T h e Ci z o u K d Zl rr QESC® AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications State College Boulevard Grade Separation, City of Fullerton, CA Inspector: Mr. Rocha was the Inspector for the replacement of the at -grade railroad crossing by construction of an underpass for State College Boulevard beneath the existing BNSF railroad. The City of Fullerton and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) constructed a vehicle undercrossing at the intersection of State College Boulevard and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway. The roadway was lowered between Santa Fe Avenue to the north to approximately 500 feet south of Valencia Drive. Construction included a temporary railroad shoo -fly, a railroad bridge, retaining walls, a pump station, pavement and utilities reconstruction. Mr. Rocha also performed shotcrete inspection. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection e u i 2 d e a g of M e 'teed Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com z a m e G z c a a d Zf AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications APPENDIX C SAMPLE FIELD AND TEST REPORTS Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 1, a ti F u i l d i K g Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services r�cu e tee a www.AescoTech.com '� a n w I k e - z 0 u K d Zl A AESCO r. 17M Georgetoxa Lau, Hndaetw Bach CA 92641 Ph:714-375-39M F.. 714-375-3931 14163 Arrant Baelenrd, Fasten CA 97335 Ph: QM-284-9200 Fa4: 909 ?84.9?01 A Gedeclowd- Ensimnmewl•MalmalsTwine•Insostion SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT hh q Balding Permu No. --_ - . Pmjea 40.: 20 is I M Repots 4o.: Job Identification, Address. CG-Rl Crf Y'� 01iiik(Tledt�bl.1 (i�AGj cc14b1 Shen of Con.Addm tmctDr s tYr POLL I3 Architect; .Addrm, -. —jTWVhY L4ri -�TAPN-------- Typeeflaspectiew .!RemfoladCoocette 1PsestaessedConcrec j Masons Fisepaoli oWeldnsg c Reber � Foundation n B�chh PL p �iMx�ptt o Batting c Gypsum c Asphalt �Oths p A-i1GN Inspection Type: G Continuous o PeaWic a Tw Iacaliom shm on nsa:hed map laspectiom made, iocluding Wrasidm: B fl I D(Al v E — Nt OA e 0 A I Ilcros IlnNinng I ) oolrtaim.2) IaRsliaD of Neaiaesh WW items. wA 3) previously limd unco secled ilrntn Chsggn 4aDsayed Des auMrited by ntRiaey aadomof rvsld: Additional WspowoD:. comma To dM hest of my kmwledge. work impmt[d was in rccm*= xiih the building dgmnmmt appmmd pFaos speeifntiom and applimbleWorkmanship pmsuiom of the 1BC extcpt as wW abom SAMPLES Sd (s) of _ Concrete / Mortar I Grout I Prisms / Sail/ Rebar 1 Asphalt, Bolts & Nuts J____ See AESCO's Report No. (s) for test rrsults or additional details HOURS Dote Taal Hams ran In Time DI11 Cade Initials 93D.I� _ Rao / Sigurd by Inspcet Projrd Engines _ ',�_ �V�A Received By cct uptsudrndenNnsl%'clor E ynm/AES e. e-AFSLO _ Ydlm._A�nq -._. _Rak Bie ... Cdd- ?DIS-57 Construction Material Testing/ Inspection , aEnvironmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services I www.AescoTech.com AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications 50M REPORT OF IN -PLACE DENSITY CLIENT: cm OP HONawroti BEACi 2000 MAIN S Tom HUNTIN TON BEAC, rk 92640 PROJECT: PROJECT No. CC1401 TRINIDAD LIFT STATION NO. 29 FORCE MAIM REPLACEMENT PROJECT APSCD 1T732 Georpo m L. Hundquot Berk Cog", 9244' Tdephoat: (714 J75-3M FAX: (714)37S•3131 PAGE 1 OF 1 ROJECTNOf 2015001873 REFORTMO: D8950 DATEOFSaavta 9/10/15 AUTHORIZATION: REPORTUATE 9/30/15 SERVICE& Perfo[m in -place density and wistnre content teats to detenine the degree of field caspactlon. PROJECT DATA CONTRACTOR: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GAUZY• 80C 3440 WETVWOFTEST: GAD®SWALMO: 22862 DENSITY: AM D2922 STANDARD COONI3 6/061VRE: ASM DJ017 (XST , MOISTURE-MRGT: Rfl70U5: DENIFTY-CUWMT: Pwwta: srE iWMDOL Direct 1'rausalssion DINSMi =TECH REPORT ROKD4N a MD07URL GEaBCH REPORT antaF.aT TAT OF aIATFAIAIS ND TIRE% 4F2 "d RUM [ VO Ti®CE BA MLL SILTY SAND GRAY M/MINOR CLAY 15.5 114.5 D9974 REPORT OF TESTS FFELD OFIWNI FlEIDDEPIS Y NAr7WN TM NOMTM AlMsTU" 84 DF76rTT' Man w No GTION 1%J_ r%JwET _ MY IRS f%o0 1. 5' EDISON LINE (15D, LONG) 3' RELOM THE TOP OF GRADE 16.2 15.5 121.5 199.7 114.5 96 2. 1' BKLON THE TOP OF OWE 14.7 I5.5 123.1 101.1 114.5 94 Tat results on this report see[ pmjea specifications ae rated above. Te[hNeiu: Report DlNrihudoa: Euaa Echo in, .'P.e., 9.8 9[. Geotechnlcal "[riser F0((diky 4wczica 7T11>n %Cie e'T c w ia' VCz AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications APPENDIX D CERTIFICATIONS Construction Material Testing/ Inspection , Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services <ti ` �u i 2 d i u g ref crs e z i c a www.AescoTech.com z a m I k e Cf z e u a AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications R e m o v e y o u r n e w P o c k e t C e r t i f i c a t e Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists 2535 Capitol Oaks Drive, Suite 300 from the receipt portion and carry Sacramento, CA 95833-2944 it with you at all times. 916 263- 2222 11/19/11, CUT HEnE I ll I6/11 BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, CUT HER •...••.•-...••.•LAND SURVEYORS, AND GEOLOGISTS uT HERE I M P O R T A N T 2535 CAPITOL DAei ORIYE, SUITE 3Oo SACRAYC4 956JJ-2944 SIG 2G12222 ase .�� 1 Pleinclude your Cerlifiealc Nunitler on any c rres this office to thoffice. 16 2. Notify the Board of any name or address change In writing. enc,T cArE so CIVIL ENGINEER EXPIRATION 3 Report any Im, of this Certificate Immediately uI writing to The Board. C 53992 12/31/19 ADAM CHAMAA 4. Please s9gn and carry the Pocket Certift— with you. 6661 A L A M I T O S C R s. Fit— laminate your Certificate In avoid detariontion. HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 ADAM CHAMAA CERTIFICATE NO EXPIRATION DATE RECEIPI NO. S9naWn RECEIPT NO. C 53992 Ili 31111 1111011/ 7319035A This is your receipt. Please save for your records. PPRC 0: -. Remove your new Pocket C e r t i f i c a t e Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists 2535 Capitol Oaks Drive, Suite 300 from the receipt portion and carry Sacramento, CA 95833-2944 it with you at all times. 916263-2222 11/ 16/ 17 CUT HERE 11/ 16/ 17 BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, ., et LAND SURVEYORS, AND GEOLOGISTS tu/ HERE — I M P 0 R T A N T Cut HEC 2535 CAPITOL OARS DRIVE, SUITE 300 O SACRAMENTO. CA 95833-2944 �,®. 1. Please include your Ceri;fine Number on any car cspoodcnce to this ofricn. 916 263.2222 �� 2, Notify the Board of any name or addta change in writing. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER CERTIFICATE No. EXPIRATION 3. Report any lost of this Cenifinte immediately is writing to the Board. GE 2784 12/31/19 ADAM S A L E H CHAMAA +- Pyre signand nrry the Pocket Certificate with you. 6661 ALAMITOS C I R s. Please laminate your ccrlifinte to avoid deleT;OraUOn. HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 AD" SALEM CHAMAA C 00053992 CERTIFICATE NO. EXPIRATION DATE RECEIPT NO. QUALIFIER NO. SyW'• GE 2784 12/31/19 73190353 ® RECEIPT ND. This is your receipt. Please save for your records. 73190757 PPRGE 04/22/11 Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com j/ z o c7r % l e Cj x a u a d ZI k AF,SC'0 Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications • HOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, I LAND SURVEYORS, AND GEOLOGISTS ��� 2575 CAPITOL OAKS 9583 SUITE 300 SACRAMENT O, CA 95833-2944 916 263-2222 CERTIFICATE NO CIVIL ENGINEER EXPIRATION C 25723 12/31/17 Renewed to RUSSELL JEROME SCHARLIN 12/31/19 17782 GEORGETOWN LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 RECEIPT N I Sign.m s 53160665 BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, I .......... LAND SURVEYORS, AND GEOLOGISTS ` `. 2535 CAPITOL OAKS DRIVE, SUITE 300 C SACRAMENTO, CA 95933-2944 ,,.,.,......�...� 916 263 2222 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER EXPIRATION CERTIFICATE NO. 12/31/17 GE 751 Renewed to RUSSELL J. SCHARLIN 12/31/19 17782 GEORGETOWN LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH A 92647 OUALIF IER NO. S�gn.1u.. f- 00025tkox.0 ECE IPT NO 53160025 C( Environs AESCO I BOARD FOR ENOMMSIONAL ENGINEERS. 1 LAND SURVEYORS. AND GBOLOGISTS �.ma�yy !^-� ZE]G CAPITOL OAKS 00.1VF, sU1TE 30U CJ ` � 9ACRAM[NI'O, CA 86B]]28Aa CIVIL ENGINEER E<Y,RAT,o„ C 49661 09/30/18 DAVID JON RYAN 7851 EAST RING ST LONG BEACH CA 90808 AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Construction Material Testing/ Inspection .4w e s i e a Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com 7 s a w'7k e GF t a u K d V /, ,4 AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, AND GEOLOGISTS PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER AMER SID HAZBOON is f C 6"78 25M CApdaj oaks on", Suln 300, SeaarrWft, CA VA33-2944 Tq*0wxw ?&~ 9s6-263-2227 dC ca * wwcoelWcaeov Construction Material Testing/ Inspection 1 ti Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com vau ldCK9 'owe tie worn %ke Cjaouad VA AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications APPENDIX E RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE A partial listing of related projects for the City of Huntington Beach is provided below. Lambert Park Slope Failure Beach Gun Range Huntington Beach City School District Solar Panel Installations Roadway Improvements (Heil, Nichols, Talbert, Main, Warner, Slater, Yorktown, Garfield, Gothard, Magnolia, Graham, Slater, Atlanta, Brookhurst, Edinger, Newland Street Bridge Central Net Fire Training Facility Pavement Design Warner Avenue Sinkhole Emergency Response Overmyer Reservoir Springdale Reservoir Utility Operations Yard Van's Skate Park and Retail Structure Lift Station 4 Lift Station D Trinidad Lift Station Ranger Lift Station Atlanta and Beach Lift Station Oceanhill Sewer Replacement Sewer Siphon Remediation, Brookhurst Street Lift Station #26 Beach Boulevard Water Main Extension Warner Avenue Gravity Sewer Lift Station C Algonquin Lift Station # 10 14-Inch Water Line Installation, Huntington Harbor Water Line Garfield Avenue Main Street Parking Garage Traffic Signal Modifications, Brookhurst and Yorktown, Newland and Atlanta, Magnolia and Atlanta Yorktown Transmission Rehab Downtown Water Main Replacement Bracing Sewer Pump Station # 1 Drainage Improvements Beacon, Heil and Trudy Brookhurst Bridge Renovation Feeder WOCWB Water Line #2 Realignment Well #9 GAC Filtration System Magnolia Street Bridge Preventive Maintenance Brookhurst Street Bridge Preventive Maintenance Edgewater Sewer Lift Station #6 Bolsa Chica Signal Modifications Main Promenada Parking Structure Improvements Construction Material Testing/ Inspection , Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services l a c b u C F d C a y 4 He e z l e a www.AescoTech.com 1 0 Talbert Lake Modifications Water Damage Main Street Parking Garage Sewerline Beach and Slater Structural Wall Repair Main Street Parking Garage Heil Fire Station Tenant Improvements Main Street Library ADA Restroom Upgrades Electrical Upgrades Peck Reservoir South Beach Phase II Storm Drain Seapoint and Garfield Storm Drain 7ch Street and Goldenwest Solar Panel Installation Central Park Solar Panel Installation Civic Center AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services S u i C d i n y �iac e a i c a www.AescoTech.com T a o as I k e C z o u a d Zl;� AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications APPENDIX F LETTERS OF RECOMMENDATION Construction Material Testing/ Inspection Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services 6 u i C d i K g e r i c a rf Kc www.AescoTech.com : o crc % k e Jr a a a d Zl AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Orange County San Bernardino County 17782 Ge Wmm lane 141G9 Arta• aoulm-Ard I lundngion Beach, CaWonua 926 17 Fontana. California 919.95 Tele: (71 1) 375<,W (1 'fete: (909) 281-9200 Fav (71.0 37.r9W41 Fau (909) 2849201 AESCO COMPANY SURVEY Client Name: L 14C) f} gAZMZ Company: C f 7? IF CrcQ 0n1A Date: l 2 ! ! ! S Strongly Somewhat Undecided Somewhat Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Does AESCO appear knowledgeable/qualified to perform the testing? Overall, AESCO handles all complaints / in a timely manner. l� Would you use AESCO 1� again? Would you recommend AESCO's services to other companies? Overall, you are pleased with the way AESCO handles obstacles at the sob AESCO submits reports in a timely manner AESCO's staff is readily available to provide support when needed Additional Comments: - _e 1. How can AESCO improve? Construction Material Testing/ Inspection ♦ Environmental • Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com Construction Material Testing/ Inspection P a b' u i 8 d E 9 4.x e t C c a Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com AESCO AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications Ormige Gorinty San $umarai lu Coatnty I': V ire, i$10 A-x-Ikmlasarei i(wringmBtc k C.i1Fr.FI11i!?bri7 Fonrul' QU4- na 9:17] Tdc" el141 Ai5151:+ Td.: �-e!.w d34.-ha1 ra, d 1 p 17,11511 F... Axi% 2441'131 Client Name-t%; f9/,c1 Cornpanr: 1�.[)ti c fi [�"k L- Date: :�i :i l -- Srrnl<<ly S.?me'.chat Clnilzcideil Sottewhar StronQlY 'a' a';L A To Disagree- Di3am'cce Does AESCO appear knoivlcdgcab ic;'qualificd to perfom Iht lesting' Ow.rall, AESCO handles Fill a:atmplaints in a timely rmuiner. 1 l i;rlluiil YOU uw ATSCII- a�Fairi? Would you reLa,mmend AESCO's Services lu other cup antis? Overall, yuu are pleased wide the nay AESCO handles &Ktacies at the job AF.'tiC:(1 snhmiu mpowc in a lidnely manner AESCV's staff is -- readily available to provide suplwt when — uccdcd Cotnmcnts: ;% How can AESW improw? ff ti Sigf4wre — Cowniction Matcrial Tcoi gr Inspection 4 Environmental R Greotechnical DigineeAug Sewices wLvw. Ae,sL'r,•f evI1xalm Construction Material Testing/ Inspection I Page bF a e E d i a g rf m e z e e a Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services www.AescoTech.com 7 z o M 74e Gj z o u a d Zl rz ��NTINGT yt �► of mF 9y� ou'`�toQ AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Statement of Qualifications City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street + PO Box 190 + CA 92648 Department of Public Works (714) 536-5431 To Whom it may concern: The City of Huntington Beach has utilized the services of AESCO, Inc for over 10 years on projects requiring geotechnical engineering, construction materials testing and site inspection. We have utilized Aesco on a wide variety of projects over the years. We have found them to be responsive and provide excellent services for building, structure, utility and roadway projects. They have always been an excellent resource which we have had the pleasure of employing. We highly recommend AESCO for both geotechnical services as well as construction materials testing and inspection. If I can provide further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 375- 8471 or dverone@surfcity-hb.org. Sincerely David Verone Contract Administrator C Environi 0 Orange County 17782 Georgetown Lane Huntington Beach, California 92647 AESCO Tele: (714) 375-3830 Fax: (714)375-3831 San Bernardino County 14163 Arrow Boulevard Fontana, California 92335 Tele: (909) 284-9200 Fax: (909)284-9201 Request for Qualifications FOR On -Call Construction Materials Testing Services AESCO Proposal No. P5597 Public Works Department City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Mr. Jim Slobojan, Fiscal Services Department AESCO 17782 Georgetown Lane Huntington Beach, California 92647 Tele: (714) 375-3830 Fax: (714)375-3831 January 11, 2018 Construction Material Testing/Inspection ♦ Environmental ♦ Geotechnical Engineering Services Local fir=_._ _ -edure Manual Al�[� Consultant or subconsultarlt- .Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON -CALL OR AS -NEEDED CONTRACTS) Construction Engineering and Inspection Contracts AESCO F um'ngton h1_1 on- Call 119, 2018 Contract No.: tienst. Mains! Tcstrna [late: EXHIBIT 10-H Cost Proposal Fringe Benefit% 0vcrhead% Georral Administration % Combined Indirect Cast Rate (ICR) AURhIAL 11.80% + 143 00n/ + 10 00% R 164.80°/ OVERTIME 11,80% + 143.00% + 10.00% - 164.W1 FEE % - 10.00% R114 1NCr i°NFORMATION CALCULATION INFORMATION NarneJob Title/Classification t Hourly lulling Rate 2 Straight OT(1.5 X) OT(2 X) Effective date ofiourly rate From To Actual or Avg- (sourly rate 3 % or $ Increase (Hourly range - for clas5iftcation only Adam Chamaa, P.E., G E. Sr. Project Manager Sr. Creotechrkal Engineer Exempt $203.90 NA NA 1/112018 12/31/2018 $70.00 Not Applicable $210.01 NA NA 1/1/2019 126112019 $72.10 3.00% $216-31 NA NA 1/1/2020 12/3112020 $71.26 3.00%n $222 80 NA NA I/l/2021 12/31I2021 $76 49 3.00% $22949 NA NA 1/112022 12/31/2022 $79 79 3.00% $236 37 NA NA 1d112023 12/31/2023 $81,15 3 00°/ Kay Alabcd Project coordinator PM Exempt $2t8.46 NA NA II1f2018 12131/20t8 E75.00 NiA Applicable $225.01 NA NA 111/2019 1231J2019 $77.25 3.009K $231 76 NA NA 1/1/2020 12/11/2020 $79.57 3.00% $238-72 NA NA 1/1/2021 12/3112021 $81.95 3 00% $245,88 NA NA 111/2022 12/31/2022 $84 41 3.00% 5253 26 NA NA 1/1/2023 12A I/2023 $96 95 3.00% Debra Perez Project Manager Phi Exempt S180.01 NA NA i1112018 1213IJ2018 $61.80 Not Applicabic $185 41 NA NA 11112019 12/31/2019 $63 65 3 00% S 190.97 NA NA 1/112020 12/31/2020 $65.56 3.00% $196.70 NA NA 111/2021 12/31i2021 $67 53 3.00% $202.60 NA NA 111/2022 12i3112022 $69.56 3 00% $208.68 NA NA lfl/2023 12/3U2023 $71.64 3.00% Russ Scharhn. RE, G.E. Sr, Geutechrucal Engineer Engineer Exempt $203.90 NA NA 1/1/2019 IV31/2018 $70 00 1soTAppIicablc $210.01 NA NA 11t12019 1213U2019 $72 10 3.00% $216.31 NA NA 111r020 12/3P2020 $74.26 3.00% $222-90 WA NA ]1]/2421 1213V2021 $7649 3-00% $229.49 NA NA 111/2022 1213112022 $79.79 3 W/o $236.37 NA NA 1/1/2023 12/31/2023 $81.15 3 00% David Ryan, P E. Ivlatertal Engineer Engineer Exempt $140.86 NA NA 1/112018 12/31/2019 $48.36 Not Applicable $145.09 NA NA 1/1/2019 12131/2019 $49.81 3.00 $149.44 NA NA 111)2020 12,13112020 $51 31 3.00% $153.92 NA NA 1/1/2021 12131)2021 1 $52,84 3.00% S15854 NA NA 1/1/2022 12/31/2022 $5443 3.00% $163.30 NA NA I/If2023 12/3L9023 $5606 300°/ LPP 13-01 June 20, 2013 Local As; edure Manual Exbibit .10-H Cost Proposal EXHIBIT 10-H SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPENSATION (USE FOR ON -CALF OR AS -NEEDED CONTRACTS) Cost Proposal Ixlmsc ] Construction Engineering and Inspection Contracts A J' aSCO H-Urwa" a-h 0.. Call 1/9/2018 Consultant or Subconsultant- Contract Nn.: Cann. MaterialTe uM Date: Fringe Beaefat% Overhead % General Administration % Combined Indirect Cast Rate (1CR) % NORMAL 11.80% + 143 001 - 10.00 % = 164.90% OVERTIME 11.80% + 14300% + 10 W% 164,90% FEE % = 16-D7% RIi .I .TRif7 TWORMATTON CALCULATION INFORMATION Name/.lob TilWClassification ` Hourly Billing Rate' Straight OT (1.5 X) OTt2 X) Effeclive date of curly rate From To Actual or Avg. hourly rate' % or S increase Hourly rauge - for classification only Amer Hazboon, P.E. Sr. Project Engineer Exempt S 160.79 NA NA 111/2018 12131/2019 $55 20 NotApplleable S165.61 NA NA 11112019 12/3112019 $56.86 3.00% $17058 NA NA 1/112020 12/3112020 $58.56 3.00% $175.70 NA NA 11tf2021 12/31/2021 $60.32 3.000/ $18097 NA NA 111f2022 12131/2022 $62.13 3.000/ $186 40 NA NA 111/2023 12131/2023 $63.99 3.00% Duane Wentworth QA/(CManager Exempt $120 88 NA NA 111120i 9 12131/2018 $41.50 Not Applicable S124.51 NA NA [11/2019 1213V2019 $4275 300°f $129.24 NA NA 1/112020 12/3112020 $44.03 3-00°! $132.09 NA NA 1/112021 12/3112021 $45,35 3.OD0f $136.05 NA NA 1/1/2022 ll13112022 $46.71 3.00% $140.13 NA NA 1/112023 12/31/2023 $48.11 3.W16 Steve Crumb Laboratory Manager $133.49 NA NA 1/1/2018 12131/2018 $45 83 Not Applicable $137.50 NA NA I/V2019 12/31/2019 $47.20 3.00% $141,62 NA NA 1/112020 1213112020 $48.62 3.00% $145.87 NA NA Ul/2021 12/31t202] $5008 300% $150.25 NA NA 1/1/2022 t2,13IO_022 $5158 3.00% $154.76 NA NA 1/1/2023 12/31/2023 $51.11 3.00% OmarChatnaa QC/QA Engineer Non -Exempt $135.62 158.90 182,18 1/112018 12/3112018 S46.56 Not Applicable $139.69 163,67 187.65 1/112019 12/3112019 $47.96 3 00% S143.88 168.58 193,27 1/112020 12/31/2020 $49 40 3.001/6 $148.20 173,63 199.07 IA/202t 12131/2021 $50.83 3.Wl; $152.64 178,84 205.05 1/112022 12/31C2022 $52.40 3.00% $157,22 18k21 211,20 PI/2023 12/31/2023 $53,98 3.00% LPP 13-01 dune 20, 2013 Loral As: edare Manual Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal SPECIFIC RATE OF CONTENS ATION (USE FOR ONN-CALL OR AS -NEEDED CONTRACTS) AlE�ScQ Construction Engineering and inspection Contracts AESCO Huntington Beach on- Ca11 1/912018 Consultant or $uhcorlsultanv Conlract l4v Canst. MaserWJ TeauU Date: EXHIBIT 10-H Cost Proposal Fringe Benefit%a Overhead% General Administration % Combined Indirect Cost Rate (1CR) % NORMAL 11.801fa + 143 00% 10 Goa/o = 164.800! QV@RTIN4C 11 801/a + 143.DO% + 1000% - 164.$0% FEE °/a = 10.00% R11 1 MC, iltirriRMATIOW CALCULATION INFORMATION tiamef3oh TitlelClassifieat on Hourly Billing Rate" Straight O F (1.5 X) r(2 X) Effective date ohouriv rate From To Actual or Avg. hourly rate 3 % or S InErrase Hourly range - for Classification only Data Processor Non -Exempt $72.82 85.32 97.82 Ul 2018 12/31/2018 $25,00 Ranges ($20 to S30) $7; 00 87.88 100.75 1 i I /2019 12/31/20,19 $25.75 3.00 % $77.25 90.52 103.78 1/1/22020 12/311L020 $26.52 3.00% $79.57 9123 106.89 11112021 12/3112021 $27.32 3.00% $9196 96.03 1110.10 1/1/2022 1213112022 $28.14 3.00% $84.42 98.91 113AD 1/1/2023 12/31/2023 $28.99 3,00% Materials inspector (4) Non -Exempt $136 90 160.40 183.90 1!122018 12/3112018 S47.00 ($45 to $50) S141,01 165.21 189,42 111r2019 12/31ii019 $48.41 3.00% 5145 24 170.17 195.10 1111.020 12/3112020 $49 86 3.00% $149,60 17528 200.95 1/1/2021 12,31 t'2021 $51 36 3.04'Ya $154.08 180.53 206.98 111(2022 1213112022 $52.90 300% S158.71 185.96 213.19 111/2023 12/31'f023 S5449 3.ctJFo Nacres and classifications of consultant (key staff) team members must be listed. Provide separate sheets for prime and all subconsultant firms 2. Stilling rate = actual hourly rate " (1+ ICR) . (]+ Fee) Agreed upon billing rates are not adjustable for the term of contract. 3 For darned enrployces enter the actual hourly rate. For classifications only, enter the average hnurlp rate for That classification. Note: • Denote all employees subject to prevailing wage with an asterisks {'"J • For "other Direct Cost" listing, see page 2 ofthis Exhibit LPP 13411 June 20, 2013 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-H Sample Cost Proposal E,KHIBIT 10-H SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL (EX kMPLE 02) Pagc 2 of2 SPECIFIC RATE OF COMPE14SA-110N (USE FOR ON -CALL OR AS -NEEDED CON 1'l2ACi'S) (CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION CON'17tACTS) Consultant or Subconsultant AESCO INC. Contract No, Civil E Date _ O 1lOW I S SCHEDULE OF OTHER DIRECT COST ITEMS PRIME CONSULTANT SUBCONSULTANT # 1 SUBCONSULTANT #2 DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS UNIT UMT COST TOTAL DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS LfNIT UNIT COST TOTAL DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL S 9.00 5 0.00 NONE _ $ 0.00 }T — 1-10 and $ 0 00 $ 0.00 n.nt: 1 1 $ 0.00 $ 0,00 t3trher servI. _es- . $0.00 SO.00 $4.00 $ 0.00 _ $ O.OD S o.00 S 0.00 $ 0.0D $ 0-00 S 0.00 $ 0.00 S 0.40 $ 0.00 $ ❑.00 SO -Do $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.04 $O.OD $O.Do S0.00 PRIME TOTAL. ODCs = $ 0.00 SUBCONSULTANT #1 ODCs = S o.00 SUBCONSULTANT #2 ODCs = $ 0.00 IMPORTANT NOTES: I. List direct cost items Arith estimated costs. `these costs should be competitive in their respective industries and supported with appropriate documentations. 2. Proposed items should be consistently billed directly to all clients (Commercial entities, Federal GovL, State Govt., and Local Govt. Agency), and not just when the client will pay for them as a direct cost. 3. Items when incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstance, should not be included in any indirect cost pool or in the overhead rate. 4. Items such as special tooling, will be reimbursed at actual cost with supporting documentation (invoice). 5. Items listed above that would be considered "tools ofthe trade" are not reimbursable as other direct cost. 6. Travel related casts should be pre -approved by the contracting agency. T if mileage is claimed, the rate should be properly supported by the consultant's calculation of their actual costs for company vehicles. In addition, the miles claimed should be supported by mileage logs. S. if a consultant proposes rental costs for a vehiele, the company must demonstrate that this is their standard procedure for all of their contracts and that they do not own any vehicles that could be used for the same purpose. Page 4 of 5 LPP 15-01 January 14, 2015 Schedule of Fees Effective January 1, 2017 AESCO Standard Fees Fabrication Shop Inspections Cost (per hour) T173 Structural Steel Inspector (ICC/CBO) ..................................................................... $ 95 T174 Structural Steel Inspector (AWS) ........................................................................... $ 95 T175 Batch Plant Quality Control Technician/Inspector................................................ $ 95 T176 Reinforced Concrete, Prestressed Inspector......................................................... $ 95 Field Inspector/Technician Hours No Work Performed (Work Cancelled) ............................................................................. Minimum 2-hour Charge All field services charge................................................................................Minimum 4 and 8-hour Charge Thereafter Regular Work Hours First 8 hours, Monday through Friday, between 5:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Direct Project expenses outside services will be charged at Cost + 15%. Time and One -Half Any increment past first 8 hours through 12 hours, Monday through Friday First 12 hours on Saturday Shift between 3:00 a.m, and 5:00 a.m. Double Time Any hours past 12 hours Monday through Saturday, all day Sunday and Federal Holidays Field Analysis Cost (per hour unless otherwise noted) G200 Soil Boring with Hollow Stem Auger Drilling......................................................... $ 260 G201 Backfill Boreholes with Betonite, per foot............................................................ $ 10 G202 Backfill Boreholes with Grout, per foot................................................................. $ 20 G203 Drumming and Disposal of Clean Cuttings............................................................ $ 350 Mix Design Review Cost D250 Review of Concrete Mix Design............................................................................. $ 150 D251 Review of Grout Mix Design................................................................................... $ 150 D252 Review of Mortar Mix Design................................................................................. $ 150 D253 Review of Asphalt Mix Design................................................................................ $ 180 Page 1 of 7 U303 Technician for Specimen pick up, minimum 2 hours, per hour ............................. $ 95 U304Vehicle, per trip...................................................................................................... $ 65 Field Equipment Charges Cost E350Brass Mold, each.................................................................................................... $ 20 E351 Concrete Air Meter, per day.................................................................................. $ 40 E352 Concrete Unit Weight (Scale, Bucket, Rod and Mallet), per day ........................... $ 10 E353 Field Vehicle Usage, per day.................................................................................. $ 65 E354 Concrete/Asphalt Coring Equipment rental per hr, min 4 hrs and 8 hrs therafter $ 190 E355 Fireproofing Adhesion/Cohesion, per test............................................................. $ 15 E356 Hand Auger Equipment, per day............................................................................ $ 125 E357 Level D Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), per person per day ....................... $ 40 E358 Liquid Penetrating Consumables, per day............................................................. $ 20 E359 Magnetic Particle Equipment and Consumables, per day ..................................... $ 30 E360 Ultrasonic Equipment and Consumables, per day ................................................. $ 55 E361 Nuclear Density Gauge Usage, per hour................................................................ $ 15 E362 Compaction Test, per location/per test................................................................ $ 18 E363 Portable Concrete Laboratory -not including Technicians, per day ........................ $ by quote E364 Pachometer (Rebar Locator), per day.................................................................... $ 50 E365PID Usage, per hour............................................................................................... $ 30 E366 Pull Test Equipment, per day................................................................................. $ 60 E367 Sand Cone Test Kit (Scale, Burner, Sand Cone Apparatus), per day ...................... $ 150 E369 Schmidt Hammer, per day..................................................................................... $ 40 E369 Torque Wrench, Small, per day.............................................................................. $ 15 E370 Torque Wrench, Large, per day............................................................................. $ 20 E371 Torque Multiplier (Skidmore), per day.................................................................. $ 75 E372 Miscellaneous Equipment Charge.......................................................................... $ by quote E373 Vapor Emission Kit, each... ..................................................................................... $ 45 Page 2 of 7 Concrete Tests Cost (per test) C400 6" x 12" Cylinder: Compression Strength (ASTM C39)........................................... $ 25 C401 6" x 6" x 18" Flexural Beams Not Exceeding Referenced Size (ASTM C78, C293, or CTM 523) .................................................... $ 80 C402 Cylinders: Splitting Tensile Strength (ASTM C496)................................................. $ 80 C403 Core Compression including Trimming (ASTM C39).............................................. $ 50 C404 Coring of Test Panels in Lab, each.......................................................................... $ 25 C405 Diamond Sawing of Cores or Cylinders (ASTM C642)............................................ $ 25 C406 Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete (ASTM C642).................... $ 300 C407 Modulus of Elasticity Static Test (ASTM C469)...................................................... $ 125 C408 Unit Weight Including Lightweight Concrete......................................................... $ 65 C409 Drying Shrinkage Up to 28 Days: Three 3" x 3" or 4" x 4" Bars, Five Readings up to 28 Dry Days (ASTM C157).................................................................................. $ 375 C410 Additional Reading, Per Set of Three Bars ............................................ $ 45 C411 Storage Over Ninety (90) Days, Per Set of Three Bars, Per Month ........ $ 35 Concrete Block, ASTM C140 Cost (per test) C412 Compression (3 Required Per ASTM), each........................................................... $ 50 C413 Absorption/Moisture Content/Oven Dry Density (3 Required per ASTM), each... $ 80 C414 Linear/Volumetric Shrinkage (ASTM C426)............................................................ $ 90 C415 Web and Face Shell Measurements....................................................................... $ 35 C416Tension Test........................................................................................................... $ 150 C417Core Compression.................................................................................................. $ 45 C418 Shear Test of Masonry Cores: 2 Faces................................................................... $ 70 C419 Efflorescence Test (3 Required), each.................................................................... $ 35 Laboratory Trial Batch• Cement Concrete, Grout and Mortar Cost (per test) L450 All trial batch for cement, concrete, grout, mortar, etc.... ....... ............. $ by quote Brick Masonry Tests Cost (per test) M500 Modulus of Rupture: Flexural (5 Required Per ASTM), each ................................. $ 40 M501 Compression Strength (3 Required Per ASTM), each ............................................. $ 40 M502 Absorption: 5 Hour or 24 Hour (5 Required), each ................................................ $ 40 M503 Absorption (Boil): 1, 2, or 5 Hours (5 Required), each ........................................... $ 70 M504 Initial Rate of Absorption (5 Required), each ......................................................... $ 30 M505 Efflorescence (5 Required), each........................................................................... $ 75 M506 Core: Compression, each....................................................................................... $ 50 M507 Shear Test on Brick Core: 2 Faces, each................................................................. $ 70 Page 3 of 7 Schedule of Fees Effective January 1, 2017 Masonry Prisms Cost (per test) M508 Compression Test: Composite Masonry Prisms Up To 8" x 16............................... $ 180 M509 Compression Test: Composite Masonry Prisms Larger Than 8" x 16.................... $ 240 M510 Masonry: Cutting of Cubes or Prisms..................................................................... $ 60 Mortar and Grout Cost (per test) M511 Compression: 2" x 4" Mortar Cylinders................................................................. $ 35 M512 Compression: 3" x 3" x 6" Grout Prisms, Includes Trimming ................................ $ 50 M513 Compression: 2" Cubes (ASTM C109).................................................................... $ 50 M514 Compression: Cores (ASTM C42)........................................................................... $ 50 M515 Mortar Expansion (ASTM C806)............................................................................. $ 275 Fireproofing Tests Cost (per test) F550Oven Dry Density.................................................................................................. $ 65 F551 Adhesion/Cohesions Testing, per hour, 4 hour minimum .................................... $ 100 Gunite and Shotcrete Tests Cost (per test) C420 Core Compression Including Trimming (ASTM C42)............................................ $ 50 C421 Compression 6" x 12" Cylinders........................................................................... $ 25 C422 Compression: Cubes............................................................................................. $ 30 Soils and Aggregate Tests Cost (per test) S600 Atterberg Limits/Plasticity Index (ASTM D4318).................................................... $ 120 S601 Chloride and Sulfate Content (CTM 417, CTM 422)............................................— $ 135 S602 Consolidation, Full Cycle (ASTM 2435, CTM 219).................................................. $ 245 S603 Cleanness Value: 1" x #4 (CTM 227)...................................................................... $ 175 S604 Cleanness Value: 2.5" x 1.5" or 1.5" x .75" (CTM 227)........................................... $ 275 S605 Corrosivity 5eries: Sulfate, Cl, pH, Resistivity (CTM 643, 417, and 422) ................ $ 190 5606 Resistivity.............................................................................................................. $ 100 S607 Direct Shear Test (ASTM D3080)............................................................................ $ 245 S608 Direct Shear Test, per point................................................................................... $ 95 S609 Direct Shear Test Sample Remolding (ASTM D3080)............................................. $ 35 5610 Durability Index Fine Aggregate............................................................................. $ 150 S611 Expansion Index (ASTM D4829, UBC 18-2)...... ... ... ..... ........... ...... I......................... $ 145 S612 Durability Index: Coarse Aggregate........................................................................ $ 150 S613 Maximum Density: Methods A/B/C (ASTM D1557 or D698, CTM 216)................. $ 175 S614 Maximum Density: Check Point abrasion (ASTM D1557)...................................... $ 65 S615 Maximum Density: AA5HTO C (Modified) (AASHTO T-180)................................... $ 190 S616 Moisture Density Rock Correction......................................................................... $ 150 5617 Moisture Content (ASTM D2216, CTM 226).......................................................... $ 20 S618 Density: Ring Sample (ASTM D2937)..................................................................... $ 25 S619 Density: Shelby Tube Sample (ASTM D2937)......................................................... $ 35 Page 4 of 7 Schedule of Fees Effective January 1, 2017 AESG® 5620 Organic Impurities (ASTM C40).............................................................................. $ 85 5621 Failing Head Permeability (ASTM D2434).............................. ..... —........................ $ 225 5622 R-Value; Soil (ASTM 2844)..................................................................................... $ 285 S623 R-Value: Aggregate Base (ASTM D2844)........................................I....................... $ 260 5624 Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419, CTM 217)............................................................. $ 110 5625 Soil Classification.................................................................................................... $ 25 S626 Sieve #200 Wash Only (ASTM D1140).................................................................... $ 85 5627 Sieve with Hydrometer: Sand to Clay (ASTM D422).............................................. $ 260 5628 Sieve Analysis including Wash (ASTM C136)............. ......",.................................... $ 150 5629 Sieve Analysis Without Wash................................................................................. $ 90 S630 Specific Gravity and Absorption: Coarse (ASTM C127, CTM 202).......................... $ 85 S631 Specific Gravity and Absorption: Flne(ASTM C128, CTM 207) $ 150 5632 Swell/Settlement Potential: One Dimensional (ASTM D4546) .......I ...................... $ 155 5633 Unit Weight Coarse Aggregate............................................................................... $ 70 S634 Unit Weight Fine Aggregate................................................................................... $ 70 5635 Voids in Aggregate (ASTM C29)............................................................................. $ 80 5636 Unconfined Compression (ASTM D2166, CTM 221)...........—................................ $ 90 5637 LA Rattler................................................................................................................ $ 185 5638 pH of soil................................................................................................................ $ 25 5639 Pocket Penetration Test........................................................................................ $ 10 Asphalt Concrete Tests Cost (per test) A650Asphalt Core Density............................................................................................. $ 40 A651 Extraction % AC by Ignition Oven (CTM 382)........................I............................11, $ 145 A652 Gradation on Extracted Asph (ASTM D6507 andD5444, CTM 202, and CTM 382) $ 100 A653 Moisture Content (CTM 370)..................................................................11.1........... $ 75 A654 Maximum Theoretical Specific Gravity (RICE) (ASTM D2041, CTM 309) ............... $ 160 A655 Specific Gravity and Absorption: Coarse (ASTM C127, CTM 206).......................... $ 90 A656 Specific Gravity and Absorption: Fine (ASTM C128, CTM 207)................ 11,........... $ 150 A657 Sieve Analysis (ASTM D5444 and C136)................................................................. $ 85 A658 Sieve Analysis with Wash (ASTM D5444)....................................I.......................... $ 130 A659 Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419)............................................................................. $ 125 A660 5 pt LTMD Bulk Specific Gravity (CTM 308, CTM 375).................. ... I..................... $ 275 A661 Flat and Elongated Particles (ASTM D4791)........................................................... $ 195 A662 Fine Aggregate Angularity (AASHTO T304 A) ......................................................... $ 185 A663 Maximum Density HVEEM (ASTM D1560)............................................................. $ 200 A664 Maximum Density Marshall (ASTM D1559 and D561)........................................... $ 200 A665Mix Stability (CTM 304)...................................................................................................$ 200 Reinforcing Steel R700 Bend Test: till or Smaller ............................ R701 Bend Test: Larger Than # 11 ........................ Cost (per test) ......... $ 55 $ 85 Page 5 of 7 Schedule of Fees Effective January 1, 2017 R702 Tensile Test: # 11 or Smaller................................................................................. $ 75 R703Tensile Test: # 14................................................................................................... $ 1o5 R704Tensile Test: # 18................................................................................................... $ 170 R705 Slippage Test In Addition to Tensile Test (Per Caltrans 52-1.08C) ......................... $ 180 R706 Tensile Test: Mechanical Splice # 11 and Smaller ................................................. $ 110 R707 Tensile Test: Mechanical Splice # 14..................................................................... $ 16o R708 Tensile Test: Mechanical Splice # 18..................................................................... $ 195 R709 Tensile Test: Welded # 11 and Smaller................................................................. $ 75 R710 Tensile Test: Welded # 14..................................................................................... $ 105 R711 Tensile Test: Welded # 18................................................................................... $ 170 R712 Sample Straightening for Bend or Tensile Test (if required) .................................. $ 50 R713 Testing Multi -Wire Steel Prestressing Strand......................................................... $ 270 Metal Testing Cost (per test) R714 Hardness Test (Rockwell) and Brinnel (ASTM E18)................................................ $ 65 R715Hardness Test of Nuts............................................................................................ $ 75 R716 Hardness Test of Bolts............................................................................................ $ 90 R717 Hardness Test of Washers...................................................................................... $ 75 Concrete Coring Services Cost (per test) C423 Equipment Concrete (4 and 8 hour minimum), per hour .................................... $ 190 Individual Core Prices (all prices are for a four core minimum job): C424 Slab on Grade Coring for 2",3" and 4" Diameter (first 6" depth) each. $ 60 C425 Slab on Grade Coring for 6" and 8" Diameter (first 6" depth) each ..... $ 65 C426 Slab on Grade Concrete Core (price per inch after 6" depth) ............... $ 5 C427 Wall Cores 2",3" and 4" (first 6" in depth) each ................................... $ 75 C428 Wall Concrete Core (price per inch after 6" in depth), per inch ........... $ 5 (Wall core pries based on Contractor supplying access to area to be cored) Miscellaneous Concrete Coring Prices: C429 Patching Slab on Grade Cored Holes with 2500 psi Concrete Patch, each....................................................................................................... $ 10 C430 Thickness Determination per ASTM C42, each ..................................... $ to C431 Compression Strength Determination.................................................. $ 55 Asphalt Concrete Coring Services Cost (per test) Alternate Individual Core Prices (all prices are for a four core minimum job): A661 Asphaltic Concrete Cores 2",3" and 4" Diameter (First 6" in depth), each....................................................................................................... $ 60 A662 Asphaltic Concrete Cores 6" and 8" Diameter (first 6" in depth), each....................................................................................................... $ 60 A663 Asphaltic Concrete Cores price per inch after 6" in depth, each.......... $ 5 Miscellaneous Asphaltic Coring Prices: A664 Patching of Core Drilled Holes Using Cold Patch Material, each .......... $ 25 Page 6of7 Schedule of Fees Effective January 1, 2017 A665 Thickness Determination per ASTM C42, each ..................................... $ 25 A666 Specific Gravity for Determination of Percent Compaction per ASTMD 2726, each.............................................................................. $ 35 A667 Specific Gravity for Determination of Percent Compaction by paraffin, each....................................................................................... $ 55 Page 7 of 7 I SIiIRIT 9.1) DBE Contract Goal Material Testing Consultant City of Huntington Beach Various Improvement Projects Item No. Quant.. Quant. Meas. Unit Item Description Unit Price Total Likely to be Performed by Subcontractor (Y=Yes)? Trucking or Supply of Material Involved Y-Yea 9 Work Category Code (enter a code it corresponding cell ") either Column G or H is "V") Number of Available OBEs DBE Work Factor (input a percentage only If the number of available DBEs > 9) DBE Work Dollar Amount Comment 1 1 LS Field Material Testing $ 180,000.00 $ 180,000.00 N N $0.00 2 1 LS Laboratory Material Testing $ 40 000.00 $ 40 000-00 N N $0,00 3 1 1 LS Protect Mana emenl and Data Review $ 26 000.00 $ 26 000.00 N N $0.00 4 1 LS Clerical $ 4 000.00 $ 4 000.00 N I N $0,00 TOTAL $250,000.00 Work Code Category TOTAL DBE $0.00 WORK AMOUNT DBE Goal 0% Net 2 of2 Deremeer 30, 2014 Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-01 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment 1. Local Agency: 3. Project Description: 4. Project Location: 5. Consultant's Name: EXHIBIT 10-01 CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT 2. Contract DBE Goal: 6. Prime Certified DBE: ❑ 7. Description of Work, Service, or Materials Supplied 8. DBE Certification Number 9. DBE Contact Information o 10. DBE /o Local Agency to Complete this Section 11. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION % 17. Local Agency Contract Number: 18. Federal -Aid Project Number: 19. Proposed Contract Execution Date: Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on this form is complete and accurate. 20. Local Agency Representative's Signature 21. Date 22. Local Agency Representative's Name 23. Phone 24. Local Agency Representative's Title IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required. 12. Preparer's Signature 13. Date 14. Preparer's Name 15. Phone 16. Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: Original — Included with consultant's proposal to local agency. ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in altemate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. Page 1 of 2 July 23, 2015 Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-01 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment INSTRUCTIONS — CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT CONSULTANT SECTION 1. Local Agency - Enter the name of the local or regional agency that is funding the contract. 2. Contract DBE Goal - Enter the contract DBE goal percentage as it appears on the project advertisement. 3. Project Description - Enter the project description as it appears on the project advertisement (Bridge Rehab, Seismic Rehab, Overlay, Widening, etc.). 4. Project Location - Enter the project location as it appears on the project advertisement. 5. Consultant's Name - Enter the consultant's firm name. 6. Prime Certified DBE - Check box if prime contractor is a certified DBE. 7. Description of Work, Services, or Materials Supplied - Enter description of work, services, or materials to be provided. Indicate all work to be performed by DBEs including work performed by the prime consultant's own forces, if the prime is a DBE. If 100% of the item is not to be performed or furnished by the DBE, describe the exact portion to be performed or furnished by the DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 to detennine how to count the participation of DBE firms. 8. DBE Certification Number - Enter the DBE's Certification Identification Number. All DBEs must be certified on the date bids are opened. 9. DBE Contact Information - Enter the name, address, and phone number of all DBE subcontracted consultants. Also, enter the prime consultant's name and phone number, if the prime is a DBE. 10. DBE % - Percent participation of work to be performed or service provided by a DBE. Include the prime consultant if the prime is a DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 for how to count full/partial participation. 11. Total Claimed DBE Participation % - Enter the total DBE participation claimed. If the total % claimed is less than item "Contract DBE Goal," an adequately documented Good Faith Effort (GFE) is required (see Exhibit 15-H DBE Information - Good Faith Efforts of the LAPM). 12. Preparer's Signature - The person completing the DBE commitment form on behalf of the consultant's firn must sign their name. 13. Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the consultant's preparer. 14. Preparer's Name - Enter the name of the person preparing and signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 15. Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 16. Preparer's Title - Enter the position/title of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. LOCAL AGENCY SECTION 17. Local Agency Contract Number - Enter the Local Agency contract number or identifier. 18. Federal -Aid Project Number - Enter the Federal -Aid Project Number. 19. Proposed Contract Execution Date - Enter the proposed contract execution date. 20. Local Agency Representative's Signature - The person completing this section of the forn for the Local Agency must sign their name to certify that the information in this and the Consultant Section of this form is complete and accurate. 21. Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the Local Agency Representative. 22. Local Agency Representative's Name - Enter the name of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant's DBE commitment form. 23. Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 24. Local Agency Representative Title - Enter the position/title of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant's DBE commitment form. Page 2 of 2 July 23, 2015 Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-02 Consultant Contract DBE Commitment EXHIBIT 10-02 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT 1. Local Agency: 2. Contract DBE Goal: 3. Project Description: 4. Project Location: 5. Consultant's Name: 8. Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants: 6. Prime Certified DBE: ❑ 7. Total Contract Award Amount: 9. Total Number of ALL Subconsultants: 10. Description of Work, Service, or Materials Supplied 11. DBE Certification Number 12. DBE Contact Information 13. DBE Dollar Amount _. Local Agency to Complete this Section', $ 20. Local Agency Contract Kh 14. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION 21. Federal -Aid Project Number: 22. Contract Execution % nata Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, this form is complete and accurate. regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required. 23 Local Agency Representative's Signature 24. Date 15. Preparer's Signature 16. Date 25. Local Agency Representative's Name 26. Phone 17. Preparer's Name 18. Phone 27. Local Agency Representative's Title 19_ Preparer's Title DISTRIBUTION: 1. Original — Local Agency 2. Copy — Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract execution may result in de -obligation of federal funds on contract. ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814. Page 1 of 2 July 23, 2015 Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-02 Consultant Contract DBE Commitment INSTRUCTIONS — CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT CONSULTANT SECTION 1. Local Agency - Enter the name of the local or regional agency that is funding the contract. 2. Contract DBE Goal - Enter the contract DBE goal percentage as it appears on the project advertisement. 3. Project Description - Enter the project description as it appears on the project advertisement (Bridge Rehab, Seismic Rehab, Overlay, Widening, etc). 4. Project Location - Enter the project location as it appears on the project advertisement. 5. Consultant's Name - Enter the consultant's firm name. 6. Prime Certified DBE - Check box if prime contractor is a certified DBE. 7. Total Contract Award Amount - Enter the total contract award dollar amount for the prime consultant. 8. Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants — Enter the total dollar amount for all subcontracted consultants. SUM = (DBEs + all Non -DBEs). Do not include the prime consultant information in this count. 9. Total number of ALL subconsultants — Enter the total number of all subcontracted consultants. SUM = (DBEs + all Non -DBEs). Do not include the prime consultant information in this count. 10. Description of Work, Services, or Materials Supplied - Enter description of work, services, or materials to be provided. Indicate all work to be performed by DBEs including work performed by the prime consultant's own forces, if the prime is a DBE. If l 00% of the item is not to be performed or furnished by the DBE, describe the exact portion to be performed or furnished by the DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 to determine how to count the participation of DBE firms. 11. DBE Certification Number - Enter the DBE's Certification Identification Number. All DBEs must be certified on the date bids are opened. 12. DBE Contact Information - Enter the name, address, and phone number of all DBE subcontracted consultants. Also, enter the prime consultant's name and phone number, if the prime is a DBE. 13. DBE Dollar Amount - Enter the subcontracted dollar amount of the work to be performed or service to be provided. Include the prime consultant if the prime is a DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 for how to count full/partial participation. 14. Total Claimed DBE Participation - $: Enter the total dollar amounts entered in the "DBE Dollar Amount" column. %: Enter the total DBE participation claimed ("Total Participation Dollars Claimed" divided by item "Total Contract Award Amount'). If the total % claimed is less than item "Contract DBE Goal," an adequately documented Good Faith Effort (GFE) is required (see Exhibit 15-H DBE Information - Good Faith Efforts of the LAPM). 15. Preparer's Signature - The person completing the DBE commitment form on behalf of the consultant's firm must sign their name. 16. Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the consultant's preparer. 17. Preparer's Name - Enter the name of the person preparing and signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 18. Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 19. Preparer's Title - Enter the position/title of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. LOCAL AGENCY SECTION 20. Local Agency Contract Number - Enter the Local Agency contract number or identifier. 21. Federal -Aid Project Number - Enter the Federal -Aid Project Number. 22. Contract Execution Date - Enter the date the contract was executed. 23. Local Agency Representative's Signature - The person completing this section of the form for the Local Agency must sign their name to certify that the information in this and the Consultant Section of this form is complete and accurate. 24. Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the Local Agency Representative. 25. Local Agency Representative's Name - Enter the name of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant's DBE commitment form. 26. Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant's DBE commitment form. 27. Local Agency Representative Title - Enter the position/title of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant's DBE commitment form. Page 2 of 2 July 23, 2015 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q Disclosure of Lobbying Activities EXHIBIT TO-Q DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT 1'O 31 U.S.C. 1352 1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type: ❑ a. contract ❑ a. bid/offer/application ❑ a. initial b. grant b. initial award b. material change c. cooperative agreement c. post -award d. loan e. loan guarantee f. loan insurance 4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity Prime �Subawardee Tier , if known Congressional District, if known 6. Federal Department/Agency: 8. Federal Action Number, if known: For Material Change Only: year quarter date of last report 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime: Congressional District, if known 7. Federal Program Name/Description: CFDA Number, if applicable 9. Award Amount, ifknown: 10, Name and Address of Lobby Entity 11. Individuals Performing Services (If individual, last name. first name, MI) (including address if different from No. 10) (last name, first name, MI) 12. 13. 15. (attach Continuation Sheets) if necessary) Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 44. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ actual ❑ planned a. retainer b. one-time fee Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission ®a. cash d. contingent fee b. in -kind; specify: nature e deferred Value f other, specify Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in item 12: (attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary) 16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes ❑ No ❑ 17. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title 31 U S C_ Section 1352 This disclosure of lobbying reliance Signature: was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U S C. Print Name: 1352 This information will be reported to Congress semiannually and will be available for public inspection Any person who fads to file the required disclosure shall be subject Title: to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure Telephone No.: Federal Use Only: LLL Rev Distribution: Ong- Local Agency Project Files Date: Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Fonn - LLL Page l LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q Disclosure of Lobbying Activities INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING EXHIBIT 10-Q DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYYNG ACTIVITIES This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether subawardee or prime federal recipient at the initiation or receipt of covered federal action or a material change to previous filing pursuant to title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. The filing of a form is required for such payment or agreement to make payment to lobbying entity for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress an officer or employee of Congress or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with a covered federal action. Attach a continuation sheet for additional information if the space on the form is inadequate. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and material change report. Refer to the implementing guidance published by the Office of Management and Budget for additional information. 1. Identify the type of covered federal action for which lobbying activity is or has been secured to influence, the outcome of a covered federal action. 2. Identify the status of the covered federal action. 3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a follow-up report caused by a material change to the information previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter the date of the last, previously submitted report by this reporting entity for this covered federal action. 4. Enter the full name, address, city, state, and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District if known. Check the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is or expects to be a prime or subaward recipient. Identity the tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the first tier. Subawards include but are not limited to: subcontracts, subgrants, and contract awards under grants. 5. If the organization filing the report in Item 4 checks "Subawadee" then enter the full name, address, city, state, and zip code of the prime federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known. 6. Enter the name of the federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one organization level below agency name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard. 7. Enter the federal program name or description for the covered federal action (item I). If known, enter the full Catalog offederal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans and loan commitments. 8. Enter the most appropriate federal identifying number available for the federal action identification in item I (e.g., Request for Proposal (RFP) number, Invitation for Bid (IFB) number, grant announcement number, the contract grant. or loan award number, the application/proposal control number assigned by the federal agency). Include prefixes, e.g., "RFP-DE-90-001." 9. For a covered federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the federal amount ofthe award/loan commitments for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5. 10. Enter the full name, address, city. state, and zip code of the lobbying entity engaged by the reporting entity identified in Item 4 to influence the covered federal action. 11. Enter the full names of the individual(s) performing services and include full address if different from 10 (a). Enter Last Name, First Name and Middle Initial (MI). 12. Enter the amount of compensation paid or reasonably expected to be paid by the reporting entity (Item 4) to the lobbying entity (item 10). Indicate whether the payment has been made (actual) or will be made (planned). Check all boxes that apply. If this is a material change report, enter the cumulative amount of payment made or planned to be made. 13. Check all boxes that apply. If payment is made through an in -kind contribution, specify the nature and value of the in -kind payment. 14. Cheek all boxes that apply. If other, specify nature. 15. Provide a specific and detailed description of the services that the lobbyist has performed or will be expected to perform and the dale(s) of any services rendered. Include all preparatory and related activity not just time spent in actual contact with federal officials. Identify the federal officer(s) or employee(s) contacted or the officer(s) employee(s) or Member(s) of Congress that were contacted. 16. Check whether or not a continuation sheet(s) is attached. 17. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, and print his/her name title and telephone number. Public reporting burden for this collection of infomation is estimated to average 30-minutes per response, including time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0046), Washington, D.C. 20503. SF - ELL -Instructions Rev.06-04 Page 2 LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language EXHIBIT 10-R A &E SAMPLE CONTRACT LANGUAGE (For Local Assistance Federal -aid Projects) NOTE TO LOCAL AGENCY- BE SURE THAT YOUR LEGAL STAFF REVIEWS AND APPROVES ALL CONSULTANT CONTRACTS BEFORE EXECUTION. THIS CONTRACT LANGUAGE IS ONLY SUGGESTED LANGUAGE. MODIFY AS RECOMMENDED BY YOUR OWN LEGAL STAFF AND TO FIT YOUR PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT. TABLE OF CONTENTS A&E SAMPLE CONTRACT LANGUAGE Article Subject Page ArticleI Introduction................................................................................................................................2 ArticlelI Statement of Work.....................................................................................................................2 Article III Consultant's Reports or Meetings..............................................................................................4 Mandatory Fiscal and Federal provisions (Verbatim) ArticleIV Performance Period....................................................................................................................4 Article V Allowable Costs and Payments..................................................................................................4 ArticleVI Termination................................................................................................................................8 Article VI I Cost Principles and Administrative Requirements....................................................................8 Article VI11 Retention of Records/Audit.......................................................................................................9 Article IX Audit Review Procedures..........................................................................................................9 ArticleX Subcontracting.........................................................................................................................10 Article XI Equipment Purchase................................................................................................................ l 1 Article XII State Prevailing Wage Rates....................................................................................................I I Article XIII Conflict of Interest...................................................................................................................12 Article XIV Rebates, Kickbacks or other Unlawful Consideration.............................................................12 Article XV Prohibition of Expending Local Agency State or Federal Funds for Lobbying ......................12 Article XVI Statement of Compliance.........................................................................................................13 Article XVII Debarment and Suspension Certification.................................................................................14 Miscellaneous provisions ArticleXVIII Funding Requirements.............................................................................................................14 ArticleXIX Change in Terms......................................................................................................................14 Article XX Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) Participation.......................................................15 ArticleXXI Contingent Fee.........................................................................................................................16 ArticleXXII Disputes...................................................................................................................................16 ArticleXX111 Inspection of Work..................................................................................................................16 ArticleXXIV Safety.......................................................................................................................................17 ArticleXXV Insurance..................................................................................................................................17 ArticleXXVI Ownership of Data...................................................................................................................18 Article XXVII Claims Filed by LOCAL AGENCY'S Construction Contractor.............................................18 Article XXV111 Confidentiality of Data............................................................................................................19 Article XXIX National Labor Relations Board Certification.........................................................................19 Article XXX Evaluation of Consultant.........................................................................................................19 Article XXXI Retention of Funds...................................................................................................................19 ArticleXXXII Notification..............................................................................................................................21 ArticleXXX111 Contract....................................................................................................................................21 ArticleXXXIV Signatures.................................................................................................................................21 Page l of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual ARTICLE I INTRODUCTION E,XIiIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language A. This contract is between the following named, hereinafter referred to as, CONSULTANT and the following named, hereinafter referred to as, LOCAL AGENCY: The name of the "CONSULTANT" is as follows: Incorporated in the State of (NAME OF STATE) The Project Manager for the "CONSULTANT" will be (NAME) The name of the "LOCAL AGENCY" is as follows: The Contract Administrator for LOCAL AGENCY will be (NAME) B. The work to be performed under this contract is described in Article II entitled Statement of Work and the approved CONSULTANT'S Cost Proposal dated (DATE). The approved CONSULTANT's Cost Proposal is attached hereto (Attaclunent I) and incorporated by reference. If there is any conflict between the approved Cost Proposal and this contract, this contract shall take precedence. C. CONSULTANT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless LOCAL AGENCY, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims, demands, costs, or liability arising from or connected with the services provided hereunder due to negligent acts, errors, or omissions of CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT will reimburse LOCAL AGENCY for any expenditure, including reasonable attorney fees, incurred by LOCAL AGENCY in defending against claims ultimately determined to be due to negligent acts, errors, or omissions of CONSULTANT. D. CONSULTANT and the agents and employees of CONSULTANT, in the performance of this contract, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of LOCAL AGENCY. E. Without the written consent of LOCAL AGENCY, this contract is not assignable by CONSULTANT either in whole or in part. F. No alteration or variation of the terms of this contract shall be valid, unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto; and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein, shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. G. The consideration to be paid to CONSULTANT as provided herein, shall be in compensation for all of CONSULTANT's expenses incurred in the performance hereof, including travel and per diem, unless otherwise expressly so provided. ARTICLE II STATEMENT OF WORK (INSERT APPROPRIATE STATEMENT OF WORK INCLUDING A DESCRIPTION OF THE DELIVERABLES) A. Consultant Services Detail based on the services to be furnished should be provided by CONSULTANT. Nature and extent should be verified in the negotiations to make precise statements to eliminate subsequent uncertainties and misunderstandings. Reference to the appropriate standards for design or other standards for work performance stipulated in consultant contract should be included. Describe acceptance criteria, and if the responsible consultant/engineer shall sign all Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E) and engineering data furnished under the contract including registration number. Page 2 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language Environmental documents are not considered complete until a Caltrans District Senior Environmental Planner signs the Categorical Exclusion, a Caltrans Deputy District Director signs the Finding of No Significant Impact, or the Caltrans District Director signs the Record of Decision [see Chapter 6, "Environmental Procedures" in the LAPM, and the Standard Environmental Reference]. B. Right of Way State whether Right of Way requirements are to be determined and shown by CONSULTANT, whether land surveys and computations with metes and bounds descriptions are to be made, and whether Right of Way plots are to be furnished. C. Surveys State whether or not the CONSULTANT has the responsibility for performing preliminary or construction surveys. D. Subsurface Investigations State specifically whether or not CONSULTANT has responsibility for making subsurface investigations. If borings or other specialized services are to be made by others under the supervision of CONSULTANT, appropriate provisions are to be incorporated. Archaeological testing and data recovery guidance can be found in the Standard Environmental Reference. E. Local Agency Obligations All data applicable to the project and in possession of LOCAL AGENCY or another agency, or government that are to be made available to CONSULTANT are referred to in the contract. Any other assistance or services to be furnished to CONSULTANT are to be stated clearly. F. Conferences, Visits to Site, Inspection of Work The contract provides for conferences as needed, visits to the site, and inspection of the work by representatives of the state, or FHWA. Costs incurred by CONSULTANT for meetings, subsequent to the initial meeting shall be included in the fee. G. Checking Shop Drawings For contracts requiring the preparation of construction drawings, make provision for checking shop drawings. Payment for checking shop drawings by CONSULTANT may be included in the contract fee, or provision may be made for separate payment. H. Consultant Services During Construction The extent, if any of CONSULTANT's services during the course of construction as material testing, construction surveys. etc., are specified in the contract together with the method of payment for such services. 1. Documentation and Schedules Contracts where appropriate, shall provide that CONSULTANT document the results of the work to the satisfaction of LOCAL AGENCY, and if applicable, the State and FHWA. This may include preparation of progress and final reports, plans, specifications and estimates, or similar evidence of attainment of the contract objectives. J. Deliverables and Number of Copies The number of copies of papers or documents to be furnished, such as reports, brochures, sets of plans, specifications, or Right of Way plots is specified. Provision may be made for payment for additional copies. Page 3 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language ARTICLE III CONSULTANT'S REPORTS OR MEETINGS (Choose either Option 1 or Option 2) (Option 1 - Use paragraphs A & B below for standard contracts) A. CONSULTANT shall submit progress reports at least once a month. The report should be sufficiently detailed for the Contract Administrator to determine, if CONSULTANT is performing to expectations, or is on schedule; to provide communication of interim findings, and to sufficiently address any difficulties or special problems encountered, so remedies can be developed. B. CONSULTANT's Project Manager shall meet with LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator, as needed, to discuss progress on the contract. (Option 2 - Use paragraphs A & B below for on -call contracts) A. CONSULTANT shall submit progress reports on each specific project in accordance with the Task Order. These reports shall be submitted at least once a month. The report should be sufficiently detailed for LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator or Project Coordinator to determine, if CONSULTANT is performing to expectations, or is on schedule; to provide communication of interim findings, and to sufficiently address any difficulties or special problems encountered, so remedies can be developed. B. CONSULTANT's Project Manager shall meet with LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator or Project Coordinator, as needed, to discuss progress on the project(s). ARTICLE IV PERFORMANCE PERIOD (Verbatim) (A time must be sel for beginning and ending the work under the contract. The time allolved.for pei,formii7g the work is specified,- it should be reasonable.for the kind and amount of services contemplated, and it is written into the contract. If it is desirable that Critical Path Method (CPM) networks, or other types ofschedules be prepared by CONSULTANT, they should be identified and incorporated into the contract. (Choose either Option I or Option 2) (Option I - Use paragraphs A & B below for standard and on -call contracts) A. This contract shall go into effect on (DATE), contingent upon approval by LOCAL AGENCY, and CONSULTANT shall commence work after notification to proceed by LOCAL AGENCY'S Contract Administrator. The contract shall end on (DATE), unless extended by contract amendment. B. CONSULTANT is advised that any recommendation for contract award is not binding on LOCAL AGENCY until the contract is fully executed and approved by LOCAL AGENCY. (Option 2 - Use paragraph C below in addition to paragraphs A & B above, for on -call contracts) C. The period of performance for each specific project shall be in accordance with the Task Order for that project. if work on a Task Order is in progress on the expiration date of this contract, the terms of the contract shall be extended by contract amendment. ARTICLE V ALLOWABLE COSTS AND PAYMENTS (Verbatim) (Choose either Option 1, 2, 3, or 4) (Option I - Use paragraphs A through J below for Actual Cost -Plus -Fixed Fee contracts. Use Exhibit 10-H, Example 91 for Cost Proposal Formal) Page 4 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language A. The method of payment for this contract will be based on actual cost plus a fixed fee. LOCAL AGENCY will reimburse CONSULTANT for actual costs (including labor costs, employee benefits, travel, equipment rental costs, overhead and other direct costs) incurred by CONSULTANT in performance of the work. CONSULTANT will not be reimbursed for actual costs that exceed the estimated wage rates, employee benefits, travel, equipment rental, overhead, and other estimated costs set forth in the approved CONSULTANT'S Cost Proposal, unless additional reimbursement is provided for by contract amendment. In no event, will CONSULTANT be reimbursed for overhead costs at a rate that exceeds LOCAL AGENCY's approved overhead rate set forth in the Cost Proposal. In the event, that LOCAL AGENCY determines that a change to the work from that specified in the Cost Proposal and contract is required, the contract time or actual costs reimbursable by LOCAL AGENCY shall be adjusted by contract amendment to accommodate the changed work. The maximum total cost as specified in Paragraph "H" shall not be exceeded, unless authorized by contract amendment. B. In addition to the allowable incurred costs, LOCAL AGENCY will pay CONSULTANT a fixed fee of $(AMOUNT). The fixed fee is nonadjustable for the term of the contract, except in the event of a significant change in the scope of work and such adjustment is made by contract amendment. C. Reimbursement for transportation and subsistence costs shall not exceed the rates specified in the approved Cost Proposal. D. When milestone cost estimates are included in the approved Cost Proposal, CONSULTANT shall obtain prior written approval for a revised milestone cost estimate from the Contract Administrator before exceeding such cost estimate. E. Progress payments will be made monthly in arrears based on services provided and allowable incurred costs. A pro rata portion of CONSULTANT's fixed fee will be included in the monthly progress payments. If CONSULTANT fails to submit the required deliverable items according to the schedule set forth in the Statement of Work, LOCAL AGENCY shall have the right to delay payment or terminate this Contract in accordance with the provisions of Article VI Termination. F. No payment will be made prior to approval of any work, nor for any work performed prior to approval of this contract. G. CONSULTANT will be reimbursed, as promptly as fiscal procedures will permit upon receipt by LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator of itemized invoices in triplicate. Invoices shall be submitted no later than 45 calendar days after the performance of work for which CONSULTANT is billing. Invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone and each project as applicable. Invoices shall follow the format stipulated for the approved Cost Proposal and shall reference this contract number and project title. Final invoice must contain the final cost and all credits due LOCAL AGENCY including any equipment purchased under the provisions of Article XI Equipment Purchase of this contract. The final invoice should be, submitted within 60 calendar days after completion of CONSULTANT's work. Invoices shall be mailed to LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator at the following address: (LOCAL AGENCY/NAME OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR) (ADDRESS) H. The total amount payable by LOCAL AGENCY including the fixed fee shall not exceed $(Amount). 1. Salary increases will be reimbursable if the new salary is within the salary range identified in the approved Cost Proposal and is approved by LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator. For personnel subject to prevailing wage rates as described in the California Labor Code, all salary increases, which are the direct result of changes in the prevailing wage rates are reimbursable. Page 5 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language (Option 2 - For Cost per Unit of Work contracts, replace paragraphs A & B of Option I with the following paragraphs A, B, and C and re -letter the remaining paragraphs. Adjust as necessary. for work specific to your project. Use Exhibit 10-H, Example 93 for Cost Proposal Format) A. The method of payment for the following items shall be at the rate specified for each item, as described in this Article. The specified rate shall include full compensation to CONSULTANT for the item as described, including but not limited to, any repairs, maintenance, or insurance, and no further compensation will be allowed therefore. B. The specified rate to be paid for vehicle expense for CONSULTANT's field personnel shall be $(Amount) per approved Cost Proposal. This rate shall be for a fully equipped vehicle, with radio and flashing yellow light (if needed), as specified in Article II of this contract. The specified rate to be paid for equipment shall be, as listed in Attachment (Insert Attachment Number). C. The method of payment for this contract, except those items to be paid for on a specified rate basis, will be based on cost per unit of work. LOCAL AGENCY will reimburse CONSULTANT for actual costs (including labor costs, employee benefits, travel, equipment -rental costs, overhead and other direct costs) incurred by CONSULTANT in performance of the work. CONSULTANT will not be reimbursed for actual costs that exceed the estimated wage rates, employee benefits, travel, equipment rental, overhead and other estimated costs set forth in the approved Cost Proposal, unless additional reimbursement is provided for, by contract amendment. In no event, will CONSULTANT be reimbursed for overhead costs at a rate that exceeds LOCAL AGENCY approved overhead rate set forth in the approved Cost Proposal. In the event, LOCAL AGENCY determines that changed work from that specified in the approved Cost Proposal and contract is required; the actual costs reimbursable by LOCAL AGENCY may be adjusted by contract amendment to accommodate the changed work. The maximum total cost as specified in Paragraph "I," shall not be exceeded unless authorized by contract amendment. (Option 3 - Use paragraphs A through P for Specific Rates of Compensation contracts [such as on -call contracts]. Use Exhibit I0-H, Example 42 for Cost Proposal Format) A. CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for hours worked at the hourly rates specified in CONSULTANTS Cost Proposal (Attachment Number). The specified hourly rates shall include direct salary costs, employee benefits, overhead, and fee. These rates are not adjustable for the performance period set forth in this Contract. B. In addition, CONSULTANT will be reimbursed for incurred (actual) direct costs other than salary costs that are in the cost proposal and identified in the cost proposal and in the executed Task Order. C. Specific projects will be assigned to CONSULTANT through issuance of Task Orders. D. After a project to be performed under this contract is identified by LOCAL AGENCY, LOCAL AGENCY will prepare a draft Task Order; less the cost estimate. A draft Task Order will identify the scope of services, expected results, project deliverables, period of performance, project schedule and will designate a LOCAL AGENCY Project Coordinator. The draft Task Order will be delivered to CONSULTANT for review. CONSULTANT shall return the draft Task Order within ten (10) calendar days along with a Cost Estimate, including a written estimate of the number of hours and hourly rates per staff person, any anticipated reimbursable expenses, overhead, fee if any, and total dollar amount. After agreement has been reached on the negotiable items and total cost; the finalized Task Order shall be signed by both LOCAL AGENCY and CONSULTANT. E. Task Orders may be negotiated for a lump sum (Firm Fixed Price) or for specific rates of compensation, both of which must be based on the labor and other rates set forth in CONSULTANT's Cost Proposal. F. Reimbursement for transportation and subsistence costs shall not exceed the rates as specified in the approved Cost Proposal. Page 6 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language G. When milestone cost estimates are included in the approved Cost Proposal, CONSULTANT shall obtain prior written approval for a revised milestone cost estimate from the Contract Administrator before exceeding such estimate. H. Progress payments for each Task Order will be made monthly in arrears based on services provided and actual costs incurred. I. CONSULTANT shall not commence performance of work or services until this contract has been approved by LOCAL AGENCY, and notification to proceed has been issued by LOCAL AGENCY'S Contract Administrator. No payment will be made prior to approval or for any work performed prior to approval of this contract. J. A Task Order is of no force or effect until returned to LOCAL AGENCY and signed by an authorized representative of LOCAL AGENCY. No expenditures are authorized on a project and work shall not commence until a Task Order for that project has been executed by LOCAL AGENCY. K. CONSULTANT will be reimbursed, as promptly as fiscal procedures will pen -nit upon receipt by LOCAL AGENCY'S Contract Administrator of itemized invoices in triplicate. Separate invoices itemizing all costs are required for all work performed under each Task Order. Invoices shall be submitted no later than 45 calendar days after the performance of work for which CONSULTANT is billing, or upon completion of the Task Order. Invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone, on each project as applicable. Invoices shall follow the format stipulated for the approved Cost Proposal and shall reference this contract number, project title and Task Order number. Credits due LOCAL AGENCY that include any equipment purchased under the provisions of Article XI Equipment Purchase of this contract, must be reimbursed by CONSULTANT prior to the expiration or termination of this contract. Invoices shall be mailed to LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator at the following address: (NAME OF LOCAL AGENCY/NAME OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR) (ADDRESS) L. The period of performance for Task Orders shall be in accordance with dates specified in the Task Order. No Task Order will be written which extends beyond the expiration date of this Contract. M. The total amount payable by LOCAL AGENCY for an individual Task Order shall not exceed the amount agreed to in the Task Order, unless authorized by contract amendment. N. if the Consultant fails to satisfactorily complete a deliverable according to the schedule set forth in a Task Order, no payment will be made until the deliverable has been satisfactorily completed. O. Task Orders may not be used to amend this Agreement and may not exceed the scope of work under this Agreement. P. The total amount payable by LOCAL AGENCY for all Task Orders resulting from this contract shall not exceed $ (Amount). It is understood and agreed that there is no guarantee, either expressed or implied that this dollar amount will be authorized under this contract through Task Orders. (Option 4 - Use paragraphs A through E below, for lump sum contracts. Use Exhibit 10-H, Example 41 for Cost Proposal Format) A. The method of payment for this contract will be based on lump sum. The total lump sum price paid to CONSULTANT will include compensation for all work and deliverables, including travel and equipment described in Article II Statement of Work of this contract. No additional compensation will be paid to CONSULTANT, unless there is a change in the scope of the work or the scope of the project. In the instance of a change in the scope of work or scope of the project, adjustment to the total lump sum compensation will be negotiated between CONSULTANT and LOCAL AGENCY. Adjustment in the total lump sum Page 7 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language compensation will not be effective until authorized by contract amendment and approved by LOCAL AGENCY. B. Progress payments may be made monthly in arrears based on the percentage of work completed by CONSULTANT. If CONSULTANT fails to submit the required deliverable items according to the schedule set forth in the Statement of Work, LOCAL AGENCY shall have the right to delay payment or terminate this Contract in accordance with the provisions of Article VI Termination. C. CONSULTANT shall not commence performance of work or services until this contract has been approved by LOCAL AGENCY and notification to proceed has been issued by LOCAL AGENCY'S Contract Administrator. No payment will be made prior to approval of any work, or for any work performed prior to approval of this contract. D. CONSULTANT will be reimbursed, as promptly as fiscal procedures will pen -nit, upon receipt by LOCAL AGENCY'S Contract Administrator of itemized invoices in triplicate. Invoices shall be submitted no later than 45 calendar days after the performance of work for which CONSULTANT is billing. Invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone, on each project as applicable. Invoices shall follow the format stipulated for the Cost Proposal and shall reference this contract number and project title. Final invoice must contain the final cost and all credits due LOCAL AGENCY that include any equipment purchased under the provisions of Article XI Equipment Purchase of this contract. The final invoice should be submitted within 60-calendar days after completion of CONSULTANT's work. Invoices shall be mailed to LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator at the following address: (LOCAL AGENCY/NAME OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR) (ADDRESS) E. The total amount payable by LOCAL AGENCY shall not exceed $(A►mount). ARTICLE VI TERMINATION (Verbatim) A. LOCAL AGENCY reserves the right to terminate this contract upon thirty (30) calendar days written notice to CONSULTANT with the reasons for termination stated in the notice. B. LOCAL AGENCY may terminate this contract with CONSULTANT should CONSULTANT fail to perform the covenants herein contained at the time and in the manner herein provided. In the event of such termination, LOCAL AGENCY may proceed with the work in any manner deemed proper by LOCAL AGENCY. If LOCAL AGENCY terminates this contract with CONSULTANT, LOCAL AGENCY shall pay CONSULTANT the sum due to CONSULTANT under this contract prior to termination, unless the cost of completion to LOCAL AGENCY exceeds the funds remaining in the contract. In which case the overage shall be deducted from any sum due CONSULTANT under this contract and the balance, if any, shall be paid to CONSULTANT upon demand. C. The maximum amount for which the LOCAL AGENCY shall be liable if this contract is terminated is dollars. ARTICLE VII COST PRINCIPLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS (Verbatim) A. CONSULTANT agrees that the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq., shall be used to determine the cost allowability of individual items. B. CONSULTANT also agrees to comply with federal procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Unifonm Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. Page 8 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language C. Any costs for which payment has been made to CONSULTANT that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 49 CFR, Part 18 and 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq., are subject to repayment by CONSULTANT to LOCAL AGENCY. ARTICLE VIII RETENTION OF RECORDS/AUDIT (Verbatim) For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code 10115, et seq. and Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable and other matters connected with the performance of the contract pursuant to Government Code 8546.7; CONSULTANT, subconsultants, and LOCAL AGENCY shall maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of the contract, including but not limited to, the costs of administering the contract. All parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three years from the date of final payment under the contract. The state, State Auditor, LOCAL AGENCY, FHWA, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal Government shall have access to any books, records, and documents of CONSULTANT and it's certified public accountants (CPA) work papers that are pertinent to the contract and indirect cost rates (ICR) for audit, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. ARTICLE IX AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES (Verbatim) A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this contract that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY'S Chief Financial Officer. B. Not later than 30 days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by LOCAL AGENCY'S Chief Financial Officer of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. C. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by LOCAL AGENCY will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this contract. (The, following A UDIT CLA USE must be inserted into all contracts of $150, 000 or greater) D. CONSULTANT and subconsultant contracts, including cost proposals and ICR, are subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, a contract audit, an incurred cost audit, an ICR Audit, or a CPA ICR audit work paper review. If selected for audit or review, the contract, cost proposal and ICR and related work papers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR audit work paper review it is CONSULTANT's responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA's work papers including making copies as necessary. The contract, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by LOCAL AGENCY contract manager to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by LOCAL AGENCY at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state or local governments have access to CPA work papers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the contract and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs. (The, following AUDIT CLA USE must be inserted into all contracts of $3, 500, 000 or greater). E. CONSULTANT Cost Proposal is subject to a CPA ICR Audit Work Paper Review by Caltrans' Audit and Investigation (Caltrans). Caltrans, at its sole discretion, may review and/or audit and approve the CPA ICR documentation. The Cost Proposal shall be adjusted by the CONSULTANT and approved by the LOCAL AGENCY Contract Administrator to conform to the Work Paper Review recommendations included in the Page 9 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language management letter or audit recommendations included in the audit report. Refusal by the CONSULTANT to incorporate the Work Paper Review recommendations included in the management letter or audit recommendations included in the audit report will be considered a breach of the contract terms and cause for termination of the contract and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs. 1. During a Caltrans' review of the ICR audit work papers created by the CONSULTANT's independent CPA, Caltrans will work with the CPA and/or CONSULTANT toward a resolution of issues that arise during the review. Each party agrees to use its best efforts to resolve any audit disputes in a timely manner. If Caltrans identifies significant issues during the review and is unable to issue a cognizant approval letter, LOCAL AGENCY will reimburse the CONSULTANT at a provisional ICR until a FAR compliant ICR {e.g. 48 CFR, part 31; GAGAS (Generally Accepted Auditing Standards); CAS (Cost Accounting Standards), if applicable; in accordance with procedures and guidelines of the American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials Audit Guide; and other applicable procedures and guidelines}is received and approved by A&1. Provisional rates will be as follows: a. if the proposed rate is less than 150% - the provisional rate reimbursed will be 90% of the proposed rate. b. If the proposed rate is between 150%.and 200% - the provisional rate will be 85% of the proposed rate. c. If the proposed rate is greater than 200% - the provisional rate will be 75% of the proposed rate. 2. if Caltrans is unable to issue a cognizant letter per paragraph E.1. above, Caltrans may require CONSULTANT to submit a revised independent CPA -audited ICR and audit report within three (3) months of the effective date of the management letter. Caltrans will then have up to six (6) months to review the CONSULTANT's and/or the independent CPA's revisions. 3. if the CONSULTANT fails to comply with the provisions of this Section E, or if Caltrans is still unable to issue a cognizant approval letter after the revised independent CPA -audited ICR is submitted, overhead cost reimbursement will be limited to the provisional ICR that was established upon initial rejection of the ICR and set forth in paragraph E.1. above for all rendered services. In this event, this provisional ICR will become the actual and final ICR for reirnbursement purposes under this contract. 4. CONSULTANT may submit to LOCAL AGENCY final invoice only when all of the following items have occurred: (1) Caltrans approves or rejects the original or revised independent CPA -audited ICR; (2) all work under this contract has been completed to the satisfaction of LOCAL GAENCY; and, (3) Caltrans has issued its final ICR review letter. The CONSULTANT MUST SUBMIT ITS FINAL INVOICETO local agency no later than 60 days after occurrence of the last of these items. The provisional ICR will apply to this contract and all other contracts executed between LOCAL AGENCY and the CONSULTANT, either as a prime or subconsultant, with the same fiscal period ICR. ARTICLE X SUBCONTRACTING (Verbatim) A. Nothing contained in this contract or otherwise, shall create any contractual relation between LOCAL AGENCY and any subconsultant(s), and no subcontract shall relieve CONSULTANT of its responsibilities and obligations hereunder. CONSULTANT agrees to be as fully responsible to LOCAL AGENCY for the acts and omissions of its subconsultant(s) and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by any of them as it is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT's obligation to pay its subconsultant(s) is an independent obligation from LOCAL AGENCY'S obligation to make payments to the CONSULTANT. B. CONSULTANT shall perform the work contemplated with resources available within its own organization and no portion of the work pertinent to this contract shall be subcontracted without written authorization by LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator, except that, which is expressly identified in the approved Cost Proposal. Page 10 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language C. CONSULTANT shall pay its subconsultants within ten (10) calendar days from receipt of each payment made to CONSULTANT by LOCAL AGENCY. D. All subcontracts entered into as a result of this contract shall contain all the provisions stipulated in this contract to be applicable to subconsultants. E. Any substitution of subconsultant(s) must be approved in writing by LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator prior to the start of work by the subconsultant(s). ARTICLE XI EQUIPMENT PURCHASE (Verbatim) A. Prior authorization in writing, by LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator shall be required before CONSULTANT enters into any unbudgeted purchase order, or subcontract exceeding $5,000 for supplies, equipment, or CONSULTANT services. CONSULTANT shall provide an evaluation of the necessity or desirability of incurring such costs. B. For purchase of any item, service or consulting work not covered in CONSULTANT's Cost Proposal and exceeding $5,000 prior authorization by LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator; three competitive quotations must be submitted with the request, or the absence of bidding must be adequately justified. C. Any equipment purchased as a result of this contract is subject to the following: "CONSULTANT shall maintain an inventory of all nonexpendable property. Nonexpendable property is defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more. If the purchased equipment needs replacement and is sold or traded in, LOCAL AGENCY shall receive a proper refund or credit at the conclusion of the contract, or if the contract is terminated, CONSULTANT may either keep the equipment and credit LOCAL AGENCY in an amount equal to its fair market value, or sell such equipment at the best price obtainable at a public or private sale, in accordance with established LOCAL AGENCY procedures; and credit LOCAL AGENCY in an amount equal to the sales price. if CONSULTANT elects to keep the equipment, fair market value shall be determined at CONSULTANT's expense, on the basis of a competent independent appraisal of such equipment. Appraisals shall be obtained from an appraiser mutually agreeable to by LOCAL AGENCY and CONSULTANT, if it is determined to sell the equipment, the terms and conditions of such sale must be approved in advance by LOCAL AGENCY. 49 CFR, Part 18 requires a credit to Federal funds when participating equipment with a fair market value greater than $5,000 is credited to the project. ARTICLE XII STATE PREVAILING WAGE RATES (Verbatim) (Choose either Option 1 or Option 2) (Option 1 -For contracts where a portion of the proposed work to be pel.formed are crafts affected by state labor laws, use paragraphs A and B) A. CONSULTANT shall comply with the State of California's General Prevailing Wage Rate requirements in accordance with California Labor Code, Section 1770, and all Federal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work. B. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract, if for more than $25,000 for public works construction or more than $15,000 for the alteration, demolition, repair, or maintenance of public works, shall contain all of the provisions of this Article, unless the awarding agency has an approved labor compliance program by the Director of Industrial Relations. C. When prevailing wages apply to the services described in the scope of work, transportation and subsistence costs shall be reimbursed at the minimum rates set by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) as outlined in the applicable Prevailing Wage Determination. See http://www.dir.ca.Qov. Page 11 of 21 August 2046 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language (Option 2 - Use only paragraph A below when all of the proposed work in the contract is performed by crafts not affected by state labor laws or are not contemplated,for use) A. The State of California's General Prevailing Wage Rates are not applicable to this contract. Note: The Federal "Payment of Predetermined Minimum Wage" applies only to federal -aid construction contracts. ARTICLE XIII CONFLICT OF INTEREST (Verbatim) A. CONSULTANT shall disclose any financial, business, or other relationship with LOCAL AGENCY that may have an impact upon the outcome of this contract, or any ensuing LOCAL AGENCY construction project. CONSULTANT shall also list current clients who may have a financial interest in the outcome of this contract, or any ensuing LOCAL AGENCY construction project, which will follow. B. CONSULTANT hereby certifies that it does not now have, nor shall it acquire any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of services under this contract. (Choose either Option I or Option 2 if appropriate) (Option I - Use paragraphs C & D below with paragraphs A & B above_for PS&E contracts only) C. CONSULTANT hereby certifies that neither CONSULTANT, nor any firm affiliated with CONSULTANT will bid on any construction contract, or on any contract to provide construction inspection for any construction project resulting from this contract. An affiliated finn is one, which is subject to the control of the same persons through joint -ownership, or otherwise. D. Except for subconsultants whose services are limited to providing surveying or materials testing information, no subconsultant who has provided design services in connection with this contract shall be eligible to bid on any construction contract, or on any contract to provide construction inspection for any construction project resulting from this contract. (Option 2 - Use paragraphs C, D & E below with paragraphs A & B above for Construction Contract Administration contracts only) C. CONSULTANT hereby certifies that neither CONSULTANT, its employees, nor any firm affiliated with CONSULTANT providing services on this project prepared the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate for any construction project included within this contract. An affiliated firm is one, which is subject to the control of the same persons through joint- ownership, or otherwise. D. CONSULTANT further certifies that neither CONSULTANT, nor any firm affiliated with CONSULTANT, will bid on any construction subcontracts included within the construction contract. Additionally, CONSULTANT certifies that no person working under this contract is also employed by the construction contractor for any project included within this contract. E. Except for subconsultants whose services are limited to materials testing, no subconsultant who is providing service on this contract shall have provided services on the design of any project included within this contract. ARTICLE XIV REBATES, KICKBACKS OR OTHER UNLAWFUL CONSIDERATION (Verbatim) CONSULTANT warrants that this contract was not obtained or secured through rebates kickbacks or other unlawful consideration, either promised or paid to any LOCAL AGENCY employee. For breach or violation of this warranty, LOCAL AGENCY shall have the right in its discretion; to terminate the contract without liability; to pay only for the value of the work actually performed; or to deduct from the contract price; or otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback or other unlawful consideration. Page 12 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language ARTICLE XV PROHIBITION OF EXPENDING LOCAL AGENCY STATE OR FEDERAL FUNDS FOR LOBBYING (Verbatim) (Include this article in all contracts where federal.funding will exceed $150,000. If less than $150,000 in federal funds will be expended on the contract,, delete this article and re -number the notification article which follows.) A. CONSULTANT certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that: No state, federal or local agency appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid by -or -on behalf of CONSULTANT to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any state or federal agency; a Member of the State Legislature or United States Congress; an officer or employee of the Legislature or Congress; or any employee of a Member of the Legislature or Congress, in connection with the awarding of any state or federal contract; the making of any state or federal grant; the making of any state or federal loan; the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any state or federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid, or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency; a Member of Congress; an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress; in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; CONSULTANT shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying", in accordance with its instructions. B. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. C. CONSULTANT also agrees by signing this document that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower -tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. ARTICLE XVI STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE A. CONSULTANT's signature affixed herein, and dated, shall constitute a certification under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that CONSULTANT has, unless exempt, complied with, the nondiscrimination prograrn requirernents of Government Code Section 12990 and Title 2, California Administrative Code, Section 8103. B. During the performance of this Contract, Consultant and its subconsultants shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (e.g., cancer), age (over 40), marital status, and denial of family care leave. Consultant and subconsultants shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. Consultant and subconsultants shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code § 12990 (a-t) et seq.) and the Sapplicable regulations promulgated there under (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 7285 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a-t), set forth in Chapter S of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations, are incorporated into this Contract by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Page 13 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language Consultant and its subconsultants shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other Agreement. (For contracts with Federal funding, add paragraphs C & D) C. The Consultant shall comply with regulations relative to Title VI (nondiscrimination in federally -assisted programs of the Department of Transportation — Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21 - Effectuation of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act). Title VI provides that the recipients of federal assistance will implement and maintain a policy of nondiscrimination in which no person in the state of California shall, on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, disability, be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or subject to discrimination under any program or activity by the recipients of federal assistance or their assignees and successors in interest. D. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it during the Agreement shall act in accordance with Title V1. Specifically, the Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, or disability in the selection and retention of Subconsultants, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The Consultant shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the U.S. DOT's Regulations, including employment practices when the Agreement covers a program whose goal is employment. ARTICLE XVII DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION A. CONSULTANT's signature affixed herein, shall constitute a certification under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that CONSULTANT has complied with Title 2 CFR, Part 180, "OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government wide Debarment and Suspension (nonprocurement)", which certifies that he/she or any person associated therewith in the capacity of owner, partner, director, officer, or manager, is not currently under suspension, debarment, voluntary exclusion, or determination of ineligibility by any federal agency; has not been suspended, debarred, voluntarily excluded, or determined ineligible by any federal agency within the past three (3) years; does not have a proposed debarment pending; and has not been indicted, convicted, or had a civil judgment rendered against it by a court of competent jurisdiction in any matter involving fraud or official misconduct within the past three (3) years. Any exceptions to this certification must be disclosed to LOCAL AGENCY. B. Exceptions will not necessarily result in denial of recommendation for award, but will be considered in determining CONSULTANT responsibility. Disclosures must indicate to whom exceptions apply, initiating agency, and dates of action. C. Exceptions to the Federal Government Excluded Parties List System maintained by the General Services Administration are to be determined by the Federal highway Administration. ARTICLE XVIII FUNDING REQUIREMENTS A. It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract may have been written before ascertaining the availability of funds or appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur if the contract were executed after that determination was made. B. This contract is valid and enforceable only, if sufficient funds are made available to LOCAL AGENCY for the purpose of this contract. In addition, this contract is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, conditions, or any statute enacted by the Congress, State Legislature, or LOCAL AGENCY governing board that may affect the provisions, terns, or funding of this contract in any manner. C. It is mutually agreed that if sufficient funds are not appropriated, this contract may be amended to reflect any reduction in funds. Page 14 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language D. LOCAL AGENCY has the option to void the contract under the 30-day termination clause pursuant to Article VI, or by mutual agreement to amend the contract to reflect any reduction of funds. ARTICLE XIX CHANGE IN TERMS A. This contract may be amended or modified only by mutual written agreement of the parties. B. CONSULTANT shall only commence work covered by an amendment after the amendment is executed and notification to proceed has been provided by LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator. C. There shall be no change in CONSULTANT's Project Manager or members of the project team, as listed in the approved Cost Proposal, which is a part of this contract without prior written approval by LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator. ARTICLE XX DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (DBE) PARTICIPATION A. This contract is subject to 49 CFR, Part 26 entitled "Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs". Consultants who obtain DBE participation on this contract will assist Caltrans in meeting its federally mandated statewide overall DBE goal. B. The goal for DBE participation for this contract is %. Participation by DBE consultant or subconsultants shall be in accordance with information contained in the Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment (Exhibit 10-01), or in the Consultant Contract DBE hnformation (Exhibit 10-02) attached hereto and incorporated as part of the Contract. If a DBE subconsultant is unable to perform, CONSULTANT must make a good faith effort to replace him/her with another DBE subconsultant, if the goal is not otherwise met. C. DBEs and other small businesses, as defined in 49 CFR, Part 26 are encouraged to participate in the performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with federal funds. CONSULTANT or subconsultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. CONSULTANT shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR, Part 26 in the award and administration of US DOT -assisted agreements. Failure by CONSULTANT to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as LOCAL AGENCY deems appropriate. D. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract shall contain all of the provisions of this section. E. A DBE firm may be terminated only with prior written approval from LOCAL AGENCY and only for the reasons specified in 49 CFR 26.53(f). Prior to requesting LOCAL AGENCY consent for the termination, CONSULTANT must meet the procedural requirements specified in 49 CFR 26.53(f). F. A DBE performs a Commercially Useful Function (CUF) when it is responsible for execution of the work of the contract and is carrying out its responsibilities by actually performing, managing, and supervising the work involved. To perform a CUF, the DBE must also be responsible with respect to materials and supplies used on the contract, for negotiating price, determining quality and quantity, ordering the material, and installing (where applicable) and paying for the material itself. To determine whether a DBE is performing a CUF, evaluate the amount of work subcontracted, industry practices, whether the amount the firm is to be paid under the, contract is commensurate with the work it is actually performing, and other relevant factors. G. A DBE does not perform a CUF if its role is limited to that of an extra participant in a transaction, contract, or project through which funds are passed in order to obtain the appearance of DBE participation. In determining whether a DBE is such an extra participant, examine similar transactions, particularly those in which DBEs do not participate. Page 15 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language H. If a DBE does not perform or exercise responsibility for at least thirty percent (30%) of the total cost of its contract with its own work force, or the DBE subcontracts a greater portion of the work of the contract than would be expected on the basis of normal industry practice for the type of work involved, it will be presumed that it is not performing a CUF. 1. CONSULTANT shall maintain records of materials purchased or supplied from all subcontracts entered into with certified DBEs. The records shall show the name and business address of each DBE or vendor and the total dollar amount actually paid each DBE or vendor, regardless of tier. The records shall show the date of payment and the total dollar figure paid to all firms. DBE prime consultants shall also show the date of work performed by their own forces along with the corresponding dollar value of the work. Upon completion of the Contract, a summary of these records shall be prepared and submitted on the form entitled, `'Final Report -Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), First -Tier Subconsultants" CEM-2402F [Exhibit 17-F, of the LAPM], certified correct by CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT's authorized representative and shall be furnished to the Contract Administrator with the final invoice. Failure to provide the summary of DBE payments with the final invoice will result in twenty-five percent (25%) of the dollar value of the invoice being withheld from payment until the form is submitted. The amount will be returned to CONSULTANT when a satisfactory "Final Report -Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), First -Tier Subconsultants" is submitted to the Contract Administrator. K. if a DBE subconsultant is decertified during the life of the contract, the decertified subconsultant shall notify CONSULTANT in writing with the date of decertification. If a subconsultant becomes a certified DBE during the life of the Contract, the subconsultant shall notify CONSULTANT in writing with the date of certification. Any changes should be reported to LOCAL AGENCY'S Contract Administrator within 30 days. ARTICLE XXI CONTINGENT FEE CONSULTANT warrants, by execution of this contract that no person or selling agency has been employed, or retained, to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding, for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees, or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by CONSULTANT for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty, LOCAL AGENCY has the right to annul this contract without liability; pay only for the value of the work actually performed, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. ARTICLE XXII DISPUTES (Choose either Option I or Option 2) (Option 1 - Use paragraphs A through C below for all contracts without PS&E submittal) A. Any dispute, other than audit, concerning a question of fact arising under this contract that is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by a committee consisting of LOCAL AGENCY's Contract Administrator and (Insert Department Head or Official), who may consider written or verbal information submitted by CONSULTANT. B. Not later than 30 days after completion of all work under the contract, CONSULTANT may request review by LOCAL AGENCY Governing Board of unresolved claims or disputes, other than audit. The request for review will be submitted in writing. C. Neither the pendency of a dispute, nor its consideration by the committee will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance in accordance with the terns of this contract. (Option 2 - Replace Paragraph B, above, with the following for contracts requiring the submission of PS&E) Page 16 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language B. Not later than 30 days after completion of all deliverables necessary to complete the plans, specifications and estimate, CONSULTANT may request review by LOCAL AGENCY Governing Board of unresolved claims or disputes, other than audit. The request for review will be submitted in writing. ARTICLE XXIII INSPECTION OF WORK CONSULTANT and any subconsultant shall pen -nit LOCAL AGENCY, the state, and the FHWA if federal participating funds are used in this contract; to review and inspect the project activities and files at all reasonable times during the performance period of this contract including review and inspection on a daily basis. ARTICLE XXIV SAFETY (Use on all contracts regardless of funding source) A. CONSULTANT shall comply with OSHA regulations applicable to CONSULTANT regarding necessary safety equipment or procedures. CONSULTANT shall comply with safety instructions issued by LOCAL AGENCY Safety Officer and other LOCAL AGENCY representatives. CONSULTANT personnel shall wear hard hats and safety vests at all times while working on the construction project site. B. Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 591 of the Vehicle Code, LOCAL AGENCY has determined that such areas are within the limits of the project and are open to public traffic. CONSULTANT shall comply with all of the requirements set forth in Divisions 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 of the Vehicle Code. CONSULTANT shall take all reasonably necessary precautions for safe operation of its vehicles and the protection of the traveling public from injury and damage from such vehicles. C. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract, shall contain all of the provisions of this Article. (Add to all contracts, which may require trenching offive feet or deeper) D. CONSULTANT must have a Division of Occupational Safety and Health (CAL -OSHA) permit(s), as outlined in California Labor Code Sections 6500 and 6705, prior to the initiation of any practices, work, method, operation, or process related to the construction or excavation of trenches which are five feet or deeper. ARTICLE XXV INSURANCE (Choose either Option I or Option 2) (Option I - for Contracts with a scope ofservices that may require the consultant or subconsullant to work within the operating state or Local Agency Highway Right of Way; where there would be exposure to public traj�c or construction operations) A. Prior to commencement of the work described herein, CONSULTANT shall furnish LOCAL AGENCY a Certificate of Insurance stating that there is general comprehensive liability insurance presently in effect for CONSULTANT with a combined single limit (CSL) of not less than one million dollars ($1.000,000) per occurrence. B. The Certificate of Insurance will provide: 1. That the insurer will not cancel the insured's coverage without 30 days prior written notice to LOCAL AGENCY. 2. That LOCAL AGENCY, its officers, agents, employees, and servants are included as additional insureds, but only insofar as the operations under this contract are concerned. Page 17 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language 3. That LOCAL AGENCY will not be responsible for any premiums or assessments on the policy. C. CONSULTANT agrees that the bodily injury liability insurance herein provided for, shall be in effect at all times during the term of this contract. In the event said insurance coverage expires at any time or times during the term of this contract, CONSULTANT agrees to provide at least thirty (30) days prior notice to said expiration date; and a new Certificate of Insurance evidencing insurance coverage as provided for herein, for not less than either the remainder of the term of the contract, or for a period of not less than one (1) year. New Certificates of Insurance are subject to the approval of LOCAL AGENCY. In the event CONSULTANT fails to keep in effect at all times insurance coverage as herein provided, LOCAL AGENCY may, in addition to any other remedies it may have, terminate this contract upon occurrence of such event. (Option 2 - For Contracts with a scope of services that will not require the Consultant or subconsultant to work within the operating State or LOCAL AGENCY Highway Right of Way where there would be exposure to public traff c or construction Consultant operations) CONSULTANT is not required to show evidence of general comprehensive liability insurance. ARTICLE XXVI OWNERSHIP OF DATA A. Upon completion of all work under this contract, ownership and title to all reports, documents, plans, specifications, and estimates produce as part of this contract will automatically be vested in LOCAL AGENCY; and no further agreement will be necessary to transfer ownership to LOCAL AGENCY. CONSULTANT shall furnish LOCAL AGENCY all necessary copies of data needed to complete the review and approval process. B. It is understood and agreed that all calculations, drawings and specifications, whether in hard copy or machine-readable form, are intended for one-time use in the construction of the project for which this contract has been entered into. C. CONSULTANT is not liable for claims, liabilities, or losses arising out of, or connected with the modification, or misuse by LOCAL AGENCY of the machine-readable information and data provided by CONSULTANT under this contract; further, CONSULTANT is not liable for claims, liabilities, or losses arising out of, or connected with any use by LOCAL AGENCY of the project documentation on other projects for additions to this project, or for the completion of this project by others, except only such use as many be authorized in writing by CONSULTANT. D. Applicable patent rights provisions regarding rights to inventions shall be included in the contracts as appropriate (48 CFR 27, Subpart 27.3 - Patent Rights under Government Contracts for federal -aid contracts). E. LOCAL AGENCY may permit copyrighting reports or other agreement products. If copyrights are permitted; the agreement shall provide that the FHWA shall have the royalty -free nonexclusive and irrevocable right to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use; and to authorize others to use, the work for government purposes. ARTICLE XXVII CLAIMS FILED BY LOCAL AGENCY's CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR A. If claims are filed by LOCAL AGENCY's construction contractor relating to work performed by CONSULTANT's personnel, and additional information or assistance from CONSULTANT's personnel is required in order to evaluate or defend against such claims; CONSULTANT agrees to make its personnel available for consultation with LOCAL AGENCY'S construction contract administration and legal staff and for testimony, if necessary, at depositions and at trial or arbitration proceedings. B. CONSULTANT's personnel that LOCAL AGENCY considers essential to assist in defending against construction contractor claims will be made available on reasonable notice from LOCAL AGENCY. Page 18 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language Consultation or testimony will be reimbursed at the same rates, including travel costs that are being paid for CONSULTANT's personnel services under this contract. C. Services of CONSULTANT's personnel in connection with LOCAL AGENCY's construction contractor claims will be performed pursuant to a written contract amendment, if necessary, extending the termination date of this contract in order to resolve the construction claims. ARTICLE XXVIII CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA A. All financial, statistical, personal, technical, or other data and information relative to LOCAL AGENCY's operations, which are designated confidential by LOCAL AGENCY and made available to CONSULTANT in order to carry out this contract, shall be protected by CONSULTANT from unauthorized use and disclosure. B. Permission to disclose information on one occasion, or public hearing held by LOCAL AGENCY relating to the contract, shall not authorize CONSULTANT to further disclose such information, or disseminate the same on any other occasion. C. CONSULTANT shall not comment publicly to the pressor any other media regarding the contract or LOCAL AGENCY's actions on the same, except to LOCAL AGENCY's staff, CONSULTANT's own personnel involved in the performance of this contract, at public hearings or in response to questions from a Legislative committee. D. CONSULTANT shall not issue any news release or public relations item of any nature, whatsoever, regarding work performed or to be performed under this contract without prior review of the contents thereof by LOCAL AGENCY, and receipt of LOCAL AGENCY'S written permission. E. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this contract shall contain all of the provisions of this Article. (For PS&E contracts add paragraph F, below, to paragraphs A through E, above) F. All information related to the construction estimate is confidential, and shall not be disclosed by CONSULTANT to any entity other than LOCAL AGENCY. ARTICLE XXIX NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CERTIFICATION In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 10296, CONSULTANT hereby states under penalty of perjury that no more than one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against CONSULTANT within the immediately preceding two-year period, because of CONSULTANT's failure to comply with an order of a federal court that orders CONSULTANT to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board. ARTICLE XXX EVALUATION OF CONSULTANT CONSULTANT's performance will be evaluated by LOCAL AGENCY. A copy of the evaluation will be sent to CONSULTANT for comments. The evaluation together with the comments shall be retained as part of the contract record. Page 19 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language ARTICLE XXXI RETENTION OF FUNDS A. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this Contract shall contain all of the provisions of this section. (Local agency to include either B, C, or D below; delete the other two) B. No retainage will be withheld by the Agency from progress payments due the prime consultant. Retainage by the prime consultant or subconsultants is prohibited, and no retainage will be held by the prime consultant from progress due subconsultants. Any violation of this provision shall subject the violating prime consultant or subconsultants to the penalties, sanctions, and other remedies specified in Section 7108.5 of the California Business and Professions Code. This requirement shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative, or judicial remedies, otherwise available to the prime consultant or subconsultant in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by the prime consultant or deficient subconsultant performance, or noncompliance by a subconsultant. This provision applies to both DBE and non -DBE prime consultants and subconsultants. C. No retainage will be held by the Agency from progress payments due the prime consultant. Any retainage held by the prime consultant or subconsultants from progress payments due subconsultants shall be promptly paid in full to subconsultants within 30 days after the subconsultant's work is satisfactorily completed. Federal law (49 CFR 26.29) requires that any delay or postponement of payment over the 30 days may take place only for good cause and with the Agency's prior written approval. Any violation of this provision shall subject the violating prime consultant or subconsultant to the penalties, sanctions and other remedies specified in Section 7108.5 of the Business and Professions Code. These requirements shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative, or judicial remedies, otherwise available to the prime consultant or subconsultant in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by the prime consultant, deficient subconsultant performance, or noncompliance by a subconsultant. This provision applies to both DBE and non -DBE prime consultant and subconsultants. D. The Agency shall hold retainage from the prime consultant and shall make prompt and regular incremental acceptances of portions, as detenuined by the Agency, of the contract work, and pay retainage to the prime consultant based on these acceptances. The prime consultant, or subconsultant, shall return all monies withheld in retention from a subconsultant within thirty (30) days after receiving payment for work satisfactorily completed and accepted including incremental acceptances of portions of the contract work by the agency. Federal law (49 CFR 26.29) requires that any delay or postponement of payment over thirty (30) days may take place only for good cause and with the agency's prior written approval. Any violation of this provision shall subject the violating prime consultant or subconsultant to the penalties, sanctions and other remedies specified in Section 7108.5 of the Business and Professions Code. These requirements shall not be construed to limit or impair any contractual, administrative, or judicial remedies, otherwise available to the prime consultant or subconsultant in the event of a dispute involving late payment or nonpayment by the prime Consultant, deficient subconsultant performance, or noncompliance by a subconsultant. This provision applies to both DBE and non -DBE prime consultant and subconsultants. Page 20 of 21 August 2016 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 10-R A&E Sample Contract Language ARTICLE XXXII NOTIFICATION All notices hereunder and communications regarding interpretation of the terms of this contract and changes thereto, shall be effected by the mailing thereof by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: CONSULTANT: LOCAL AGENCY: ARTICLE XXXIII CONTRACT (CONSULTANT) (NAME) (ADDRESS) (LOCAL AGENCY) (NAME) (ADDRESS) , Project Manager , Contract Administrator The two parties to this contract, who are the before named CONSULTANT and the before named LOCAL AGENCY, hereby agree that this contract constitutes the entire agreement which is made and concluded in duplicate between the two parties. Both of these parties for and in consideration of the payments to be made, conditions mentioned, and work to be performed; each agree to diligently perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of this contract as evidenced by the signatures below. ARTICLE XXXIV SIGNATURES (Name of CONSULTANT) (Signature) (Name of Signer) Date: (Name of LOCAL AGENCY) (Signature) (Name of Signer) Page 21 of 21 August 2016 ide C r's L Company Name AESCO, ITIC, Phone 714-3175-3830 An-,e" ',can Engineer'r g Laboratories 1:,c 562-697-4000 Converse Consu,,tants 626-930- L265 Geocon West, i-,c. 909-894-2175 ext, 603 GM Geotechnical, Inc, 949-888-6513 Harrington Geotechnicai Engineeriling, Inc, 7 1, 4- 6:17 -:10 9 3 lnterte.(-Ps= 714-484-8600 Kleinfelc er 949-727-4466 ext. 3139 Leighton Consudting, Inc, 949-250-1421 ext, 8771 Ninyo & Moore 949-753-7070 ext. 2262 RMA GrOUP 909-989-1751 Sniff t'-,-Frnery Laboratories 714-233-6133 ext. 209 T wining, 562-426-3355 Wilida-I E-igineerMg 71-4-978-8200 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AWARD ANALYSIS SERVICE: On -Call Material Testing & Engineering SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Engineering support for City's annual Capital Improvement Program projects. VENDOR: AESCO, Inc. OVERALL RANKING: 1 out of 14 SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS/RATERS: 1. Contract Administrator 2. Senior Traffic Engineer 3. Contract Administrator I. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REVIEW • Written Proposal Score: Avg. of 90 AESCO, Inc. — Minimum Qualifications Review Total Weighted Maximum Criteria Score Score Understanding of the Work to be Done 24 25 Experience with Similar Kinds of Work 17.3 20 Staffing 12 15 Capability of Developing Innovative or Advanced Techniques 8 10 Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures 9.3 10 Financial Responsibility 10 10 Demonstrated Technical Ability 9.3 10 Total II. DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW • Clients such as Orange County, City of Huntington Beach, City of Santa Ana, and City of Corona, to name a few AESCO, Inc. — Summary of Review • AESCO, Inc. has relevant and past experience with the city AESCO, Inc. — Pricing • Low end from $5 each for Asphaltic Concrete Cores per inch after 6 inch in depth • High end to $375fTest for Drying Shrinkage Up to 28 Days PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AWARD ANALYSIS SERVICE: On -Call Material Testing & Engineering SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Engineering support for City's annual Capital Improvement Program projects. VENDOR: Twining, Inc. OVERALL RANKING: 2 out of 14 SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS/RATERS: 1. Contract Administrator 2. Senior Traffic Engineer 3. Contract Administrator I. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REVIEW • Written Proposal Score: Avg. of 88.3 Twining, Inc. — Minimum Qualifications Review Total Weighted Maximum Criteria Score Score Understanding of the Work to be Done 23.3 25 Experience with Similar Kinds of Work 16 20 Staffing 13 15 Capability of Developing Innovative or Advanced Techniques 9 10 Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures 8 10 Financial Responsibility 10 10 Demonstrated Technical Ability 9 10 Total II. DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW • Clients such as City of Huntington Beach, City of Long Beach, and City of Santa Clarita, to name a few Twining, Inc. — Summary of Review • Twining, Inc. has experience with City of Huntington Beach in the past and has shown innovative and advanced material testing techniques. Twining, Inc. — Pricing • Low end from $10/Hr for Nuclear Gauge • High end to $6,572/Test for Superpave Mix Design, with Rubber (Excluding Aggregate Quality Tests) PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AWARD ANALYSIS SERVICE: On -Call Material Testing & Engineering SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Engineering support for City's annual Capital Improvement Program projects. VENDOR: Leighton Consulting, Inc. OVERALL RANKING: 3 out of 14 SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS/RATERS: 1. Contract Administrator 2. Senior Traffic Engineer 3. Contract Administrator I. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REVIEW • Written Proposal Score: Avg. of 81 Leighton Consulting, Inc. — Minimum Qualifications Review Total Weighted Maximum Criteria Score Score Understanding of the Work to be Done 22.7 25 Experience with Similar Kinds of Work 15 20 Staffing 13.7 15 Capability of Developing Innovative or Advanced Techniques 5.3 10 Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures 7.7 10 Financial Responsibility 10 10 Demonstrated Technical Ability 6.7 10 Total II. DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW • Clients such as City of Huntington Beach, Irvine Ranch Water District, and City of Newport Beach, to name a few Leighton Consulting, Inc. — Summary of Review • Leighton Consulting staff has relevant experience for city's needs Leighton Consulting, Inc. — Pricing • Low end from $0.35/ft for % inch Tubing (single) • High end to $2,100/Test for Compacted AC Resistance to Moist Damage (AASHTO T283) PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AWARD ANALYSIS SERVICE: On -Call Material Testing & Engineering SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Engineering support for City's annual Capital Improvement Program projects. VENDOR: Vendor #4 OVERALL RANKING: 4 out of 14 SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS/RATERS: 1. Contract Administrator 2. Senior Traffic Engineer 3. Contract Administrator I. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REVIEW • Written Proposal Score: Avg. of 76.3 Vendor #4 — Minimum Qualifications Review Total Weighted Maximum Criteria Score Score Understanding of the Work to be Done 22 25 Experience with Similar Kinds of Work 10.7 20 Staffing 12.7 15 Capability of Developing Innovative or Advanced Techniques 6 10 Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures 8.7 10 Financial Responsibility 10 10 Demonstrated Technical Ability 6.3 10 Total II. DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW • Clients such as Orange County Public Works, County of Los Angeles, and City of Long Beach Vendor #4 — Summary of Review • Vendor #4 has experienced staffing and has worked on many government -related projects Vendor #4 — Pricing • Low end from $10/Test for Sample Disposal • High end to $7,600fTest for Mix Design, Hveem Method W/RAP City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ♦ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 ♦ www.huntingtonbeachca.gov Office of the City Clerk Robin Estanislau, City Clerk November 28, 2018 AESCO, Inc. ATTN: Kay Alabed 17782 Georgetown Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is a copy of the fully executed "Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and AESCO, Inc. for On Call Material Testing and Engineering Services" approved by the Huntington Beach City Council on November 19, 2018. Sincerely, F WjPnr� M14 Robin Estanislau, CIVIC City Clerk RE:ds Enclosure Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan ♦ Waitakere, New Zealand