Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Barr & Clark Environmental, Inc - 2001-10-31 (2)
DEPARTMENTAL CHECKLIST FOR TRANSMITTING- $20,000 :& °UNDER .AGREEMENTS TO THE CITY CLERK FOROFFICIAL. FILING November 16. 2001 Yes No j NIA Barr & Clark ■ Are all blanks filled in on agreement? ■ Has contractor signed agreement? ■ Are all other signatures (e.g., City Attorney Approval As To Form) on agreement? ■ Does agreement have Exhibits and/or Attachments? If Yes, ■ Are Exhibits/Attachments marked? ■ Are Exhibits/Attachments attached? Yes No NIA ■ 1 Is Insurance required? If Yes, ■ Is Insurance attached? ■ is Insurance Approved As To Form by City Attorney ■ If waived, is Settlement Committee approval attached? 7 ■ If waived, has agreement been initialed by contractor or revised to remove j insurance requirement from text of agreement? Yes ; No NIA If this agreement requires documentation to be on file regarding Requests *■ for RFPs, have you attached this documentation (see Page 1 of agreement to determine if this requirement applies)? Please complete the section below so the City Clerk's Office can enter your agreement on the computer so that it is retrievable by keyword search (termination date is required for Clerk's computer program to flag for microfilming/destruction purposes). 1 Description of Agreement (Purpose - such as Perform Soil Analysis Waterfront Hilton/PCH/Atlanta): Provide lead based paint consultant services. (oC7p -/ID 'The following firms submitted proposals: ��R C ���`� GI►Utl"Dn�r,�n`x,l LNG • Ambient Environmental, Inc. • American Environmental Specialists, Co. / • Health Science AssociatesV 10-34-C>2�- • KR Environmental Services, 1nc. • NATEC International, Inc. � gel � c g o/Ain �r 4�.. - NO . col�.- Termination Date: October 31, 2002 g-_\bobbiV%zon1rzr3derk by.doc Su ity CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 5, INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION 'moo To: Connie Brockway, City Clerk From: Peter Grant, Prinicipal Administrative Analys 97—� Date: November 27, 2001 Subject: Professional Service Contract The City Administrator's office has reviewed the attached contract and confirmed that it complies with the new professional service contract process. Please process the agreement as necessary. r PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND BARR & CLARK ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FOR LEAD BASED PAINT CONSULTANT SERVICES EFFECTIVE October 31, 2001 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HLTNTI\TGTON BEACH AND BARR & CLARK EINTvjIRONMENTAL, INC. FOR LEAD BASED PAINT CONSULTANT SERVICES Table of Contents Scopeof Services.....................................................................................................1 CityStaff Assistance................................................................................................2 Timeof Performance...............................................................................................2 Compensation......................................................................................................... .2 Priorities..................................................................................................................2 ExtraWork...............................................................................................................2 Methodof Payment..................................................................................................3 Disposition of Plans, Estimates and Other Documents...........................................4 HoldHarmless.........................................................................................................5 Workers' Compensation Insurance..........................................................................5 General Liability Insurance......................................................................................6 Professional Liability Insurance ......................... —........... ............. --- ....... ........... 6 Certificates of Insurance...........................................................................................7 Independent Contractor............................................................................................8 Termination of Agreement.......................................................................................8 Assignment and Subcontracting.................................................. 9 Copyrights/Patents...................................................................................................9 City Employees and Officials...............................•-----..........-----...........----...............9 Notices.....................................................................................................................9 Modification.............................................................................................................10 Captions...................... . .... ........................................................................................10 SectionHeadings............................................................................... ..10 Interpretation of this Agreement..............................................................................10 DuplicateOriginal....................................................................................................11 Immigration......................................................................----............---.....................I I Legal Services Subcontracting Prohibited............................................................... I 1 Attorney's Fees.........................................................................................................12 Entirety............................................................................................................. ..12 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND BARR &: CLARK ENVIRONMENTAL, INTC. FOR LEAD BASED PAINT CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS Agreement is made and entered into this 31st day of October 2001, by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and BARR & CL_ARK ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTAN°T." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to provide lead based paint consultant services; and Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts have been complied with; and CONSULTANT has been selected to perform said services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: I. SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in the Request for Proposal ("RFP"), and CONSULTANT'S Proposal dated April S, 2001, (both of which are hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A"), which are attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT." CONSULTANT hereby designates Matt Crochet who shall represent CONSULTANT and shall be CONSULTANT's primary contract person with CITY. 01 agrer-%arri81`15..01 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTAI`CE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. 3. THE OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of CONSULTANT are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than one year from the date of this Agreement. These times maybe extended with the written permission of CITY. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be shown in the Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT. This Agreement shall terminate one year from the date of Agreement is approved by the City Council of CITY. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT on a time and materials basis, at the rates described in Exhibit "A," a fee not to exceed Twenty Thousand Dollars and no!100 (S20,000.00). 5. PRIORITIES In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, the CITY's RFP, or the CONSULTAN"T's Proposal, the follovOng order of precedence shall govern: (1) Agreement, (2) the CONISULTANT's Proposal, and (3) the CITY's RFP. 6. EXTRA WORK In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A." or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSULTANT will undertake such 01 agreefbarr18l15M 2 work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 7. METHOD OF PAYMENT A. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to progress payments toward the fixed fee set forth herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit "A." B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every memorandum, letter, report, calculation and other documentation prepared by CONSULTANT shall be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted. C. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall: 1) Reference this Agreement; 2) Describe the services performed; 3) Show the total amount of the payinent due; 4) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULTANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and 5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSULTANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If CITY does 01 agree'6arr/8.115/01 3 not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT in writing of the reasons for non - approval within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULTANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated as provided herein. D. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. DISPOSITION OF PLANS. ESTLMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT agrees that all materials prepared hereunder, including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall be turned over to CITY upon termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. In the event this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY in the completion of the PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit. Title to said materials shall pass to CITY upon payment of fees determined to be earned by CONSULTANT to the point of termination or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is applicable. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder. 01agree/barr/8/15r01 4 9. HOLD HARMLESS CONSULTANT shall protect, defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expenses, costs (including without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature) arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT's performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement by CONSULTANT, its officers, agents or employees except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. CITY shall be reimbursed by CONSULTANT for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by CITY in enforcing this obligation. 10. WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1861, CONSULTANT acknowledges awareness of Section 3700 et seq. of said Code, which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation; CONSULTANT covenants that it will comply with such provisions prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all claims, demands, payments, suit, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every nature and description, including attorneys fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against the CITY, for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall maintain workers' compensation insurance in an amount of not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars (S 100,000) bodily injury by accident, each occurrence, One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) bodily injury by disease, each employee, Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars (S250,000) bodily injury by disease, policy limit. O 1 affrmbarr:8115101 5 CONSULTANT shall require all subcontractors to provide such workers' compensation insurance for all of the subcontractors' employees. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of waiver of subrogation under the terms of the workers' compensation insurance and CONSULTANT shall similarly require all subcontractors to waive subrogation. 11. GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE In addition to the workers' compensation insurance and CONSULTANT's covenant to indemnify CITY, CONSULTANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY, a policy of general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage covering the PROJECT. The policy shall indemnify CONSULTANT, its officers, agents and employees, while acting within the scope of 1. their duties, against any and all claims arising out of or in connection with the PROJECT, and shall Provide coverage in not less than the following amount: combined single limit bodily injury and property damage, including products/completed operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of $1,000,000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than S1,000,000 for this PROJECT The policy shall name CITY, its agents, its officers, employees and volunteers as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage and that CONSULTANT's insurance shall be primary. Under no circumstances shall the above -mentioned insurance contain a self -insured retention, or a "deductible" or any other similar form of limitation on the required coverage. 12. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall furnish a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. Said policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT's professional liability in an amount not less than S1,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate. 01 agreeibarrI& 15101 6 A claims -made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the initiation of the scope of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY of the reporting of any circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. CONSULTANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following project completion, including the requirement of adding all additional insureds. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULTANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of at least two (2) years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this Agreement. 13. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULTA_INTT shall furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverages as required by this Agreement; the certificates shall: A. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; B. shall state that the policy is currently in force; and C. shall promise that such policies shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice; however, ten (10) days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSULTANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverages in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. O 1 ag eefbarv'8/ 1 Sio 1 7 The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverages shall not derogate from the provisions for indemnification of CITY by CONSULTANT under the Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or.a copy of all said policies of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on all insurance hereinabove required. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor herein and not as an employee of the CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. 15. TER-NMNATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as provided herein. In the event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, exhibits, report, and evidence shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property and shall be delivered to it by CONSULTANT. 16. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the express written consent of CITY. 0l agreerbarri&'15/01 8 17. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work,item or material produced as a result of this Agreement. 18. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICLALS CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 19. NOTICES Any notice or special instructions required to be given in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section I hereinabove) or to CITY's Director of Economic Development as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, addressed as follows: TO CITY: Director of Economic Development City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 20, MODIFICATION TO CONSULTANT: Matthew Crochet, Vice President Barr & Clark Environmental, Inc. 22850 Crenshaw Boulevard, Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90505 Phone (310) 517-0805 No waiver or modification of any language in this Agreement shall -be valid unless in writing and duly executed by both parties. 21. SECTION HEADINGS The titles, captions, section, paragraph, subject headings and descriptive phrases at the beginning of the various sections in this Agreement are merely descriptive and are included 01 agreeibarr.`8/ 15; 01 9 solely for convenience of reference only and are not representative of maters included or excluded from such provisions, and do not interpret, define, limit or describe, or construe the intent of the parties or affect the construction,or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. 22. I_NTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, void, illegal or invalid or affect the remaining covenants and provisions of this Agreement. No covenant or provision shall be deemed dependent upon any other unless so expressly provided here. As used in this Agreement, the masculine or neuter gender and singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the other whenever the context so indicates or requires. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrary to which the parties have no right to contract, then the latter shall prevail, and the provision of this Agreement which is hereby affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law. 23. DUPLICATE ORIGINAL The original of this Agreement and one or more copies hereto have been prepared and signed in counterparts as duplicate originals, each of which so executed shall, irrespective of the date of its execution and delivery, be deemed an original. Each of the parties hereto shall retain an originally signed copy hereof. Each duplicate original shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. 0l agre0barr/8/ i 5/Ol 10 24. IMMIGRATION CONSULTANT shall be responsible for full compliance Nvith the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. 25. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSULTANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSULTANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 26. ATTORNEY'S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to enforce the terms and provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees. REST OF PAGE NOT USED 01 aueelbarr/8:15?01 11 27. ENTIRETY The Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement and supercedes all prior understanding and agreements whether oral or in writing. The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth the entire Agreement between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized offices the day, month and year first above written. BARR & CLARK ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., a California corporation X, By: print name ITS: (circle one) Chairman;Presiden ' ice-Plust AND By: in (;� print name ITS: (circle one) Secretar Lief Financi r/Asst. Secretary — Treasurer 01 agree;barr.18/ 15/01 12 CITY OF HUN TINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California xvt� C. &V Director of Eco omic Development Pursuant to HBMC §3.03.100 APPROVED AS TO FORM: -�- 14511f,bl City Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: v Citinistrator REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS, REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE LEAD -BASED PAINT CONSULTANT SERVICES TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND - BARR & CLARK PROPOSAL FOR LEAD BASED PAINT CONSULTING SERVICES EXHIBIT A The City of Huntington Beach is seeking qualifications and proposals from interested consulting companies to provide services related to residential lead -based paint for City housing programs. Due to recent regulatory changes dealing with lead -based paint that affect federally funded housing programs, it has become necessary for the City to identify qualified consultants to provide the following services: • Inspection/Risk Assessment • Project Design • Project Monitoring • Clearance Testing The particular requirements for each of the above services are described in detail in the Scope of Work section of this request. Of particular interest to the City in evaluating the qualifications of each interested consultant will be the consultant's certification by the California Department of Health Services and the consultant's capacity to fully support the projected needs of the City's various housing programs. Among the housing programs that the City administers are the Single Family Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program, Multifamily Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program, Redevelopment Agency multifamily housing acquisition and rehabilitation projects, and City Block Grant housing projects. These programs are described in detail in the Huntington Beach Housing Programs section of this request. The City intends to implement a system -wide lead -based paint inspection and abatement program that satisfies the requirements of the Residential Lead -Based Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992. The new regulation can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations at Title 24, Part 35 (24 CFR 35). The City of Huntington Beach is soliciting qualifications and proposals from interested consultants to provide lead -based paint services as described below. It is intended that applicants will consider each component individually when describing their qualifications and proposals, specifically for the purpose of determining fees. Upon selection of a firm, the City Council may elect to include all or a portion of the scope of work. INSPECTOR/RISK ASSESSOR The inspector/risk assessor will provide lead -based paint inspections and/or risk assessments for single family and/or multifamily residential properties as requested by the City of Huntington Beach. All subject properties will be located within the City of Huntington Beach and will require lead hazard evaluation as part of home improvement rehabilitation activities. Lead -based paint inspections and risk assessments must be performed so as to satisfy requirements of Title X of the Community and Development Act of 1992 and must be conducted in compliance with all relevant federal, state, and local laws. Prior to an inspection or risk assessment, the consultant will be given a scope of work for general home improvement rehabilitation activities. The consultant will be responsible for insuring that areas most likely to be impacted by the proposed activities are included in the inspection/risk assessment. The City prefers that inspectors use X-ray florescence (XRF) instruments in conducting inspections and will require that all equipment be calibrated and operated in compliance with the instrument's performance characteristic sheet and with applicable laws. As a final option to resolve inconclusive XRF test results, the consultant may use paint chip samples. In such a scenario, samples will be collected and evaluated in compliance with federal and state requirements. Whenever possible, samples will be collected from deteriorated paint in discrete locations. The consultant must be available to respond to lead -based paint inspection and risk assessment requests within 24 hours. The inspector will be given the name and telephone number of the responsible party; it will be the responsibility of the consultant to arrange a mutually convenient time for the inspection. The consultant will be expected to provide all instruments, tools, and supplies to complete the assignment and to submit to the City within seven business days of an inspection a report that contains the following: • Date of inspection/risk assessment. • Inspector's name and California DHS certification number. • Property description and accompanying floor plan. • Testing/assessment protocol used and a brief explanation of any variance from standard practices. • Summary of positive test results with a reference to the floor plan. • Any observations relative to positive test results that may affect the home improvement rehabilitation scope of work. • Field data for all test results showing relative location to the floor plan, the component, substrate, paint condition, and test result. PROJECT DESIGNER The project designer will review lead -based paint inspection report(s) and/or risk assessment report(s) to determine a lead hazard reduction or abatement strategy. The consultant will design a contractor scope of work addressing all affected building components and conforming to the City's determination of the proper threshold of lead hazard reduction or abatement. Written specifications shall be submitted by the consultant to the City for review within 14 calendar days after a completed inspection. The specifications will contain the following information: • Requirements for hazard containment. 4 • Requirements for resident and worker protection. • Contractor scope of work addressing each identified lead hazard component. • Lead hazard control methods to be used. • Clean-up methods and requirements. • Waste disposal requirements. • Unit clearance examination requirements. The project designer will review and approve abatement contractor proposals and attend pre - construction meetings. The consultant will be expected to notify the City of any potential regulatory or specification violations by the selected contractor that become evident prior to the commencement of lead hazard reduction activities. For this reason, the consultant must be familiar with and abide by all applicable federal, state, and local laws, including the Residential Lead -Based Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992. PROJECT MONITOR The project monitor will conduct site visits before, during, and after lead -based paint abatement activities as directed by the City in order to ensure compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. The consultant will monitor contractor work quality and evaluate the completeness of abatement activities. The project monitor will be responsible for periodically surveying the regulated area from inside and outside the isolation barriers and immediately notifying the contractor of indications of breaches in containment. The consultant will additionally be responsible for monitoring storage and supervising disposal of hazardous waste. The City will expect to be notified by the consultant of any potential regulatory or specification violations that become evident through such monitoring activities. The consultant will maintain a dedicated site -specific field log for all project activities. Entries will be made for every day that monitoring activities take place and should contain sufficient notes to enable the City to understand conversations, instructions, and other activities that took place at the work site. The project monitor will submit to the City a close-out report certifying that the project complied with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. The closeout report shall, at a minimum, include the following: • Summary of construction activities completed. • Project -related paperwork (logs, air/wipe sample data, laboratory reports, hazardous waste manifests, and correspondence). • Conclusions and recommendations. • Certification that the project complied with federal, state, and local lead -based paint requirements. 3 CLEARANCE TESTER Clearance sampling will occur in two phases: visual examination and environmental sampling (dust wipe clearance sampling). Upon completion of lead abatement activities, the clearance tester will require a one -hour settling period to allow any airborne lead -contaminated particles to settle. If dust is observed during the course of the visual inspection, the contractor will be required to repeat the cleaning process. An inspection will be performed in each room. Once each area has been visually inspected, the clearance tester will collect dust samples. Dust samples will be obtained from areas where lead abatement was performed. Either single surface sampling or composite sampling may be utilized at the discretion of the clearance tester based on the professional judgment of the inspector and the type of abatement activity that was performed. If exterior lead abatement reduction has been performed, the clearance tester will collect soil samples around the foundation of the property where activities occurred. In addition, any nearby play areas for children should also be tested. All dust and soil samples collected will be evaluated for lead hazards as set forth by federal and state law. Clearance samples must be analyzed by an accredited laboratory as selected by the consultant, and sample results should be made available to the City within 24 hours of submission to the laboratory for analysis. The clearance tester must be familiar with and abide by all applicable federal, state, and local laws including the Residential Lead -Based Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992. Huntington Beach is more than the coastal jewel of Southern California. The City is a great place in which to live, work, and play. Incorporated in 1909, with a population of 915, Huntington Beach remained a sleepy seaside town until the oil boom in the 1920's. Discovery of an oil field in Bolsa Chica brought this industry to the forefront of the local economy for decades. During the 1960's, Huntington Beach became identified as Surf City when the popular Jan and Dan song "Surf City" climbed the musical charts, bringing the fantasy of the beach life- style to national attention. Today, with the City hosting the International Surfing Museum, professional surfing contests, and some of the best year-round recreational surfing, it continues to hold the title of Surf City, U.S.A. While the City is famous for its beautiful, wide beaches and the longest concrete municipal pier in the United States, the beauty of Huntington Beach is not limited to its beaches. It also has several fine expansive parks, equestrian trails, and recreational facilities. A variety of 4 cultural opportunities exist within Huntington Beach, including the Art Center and the School District's School of Performing Arts. Boasting the nation's second largest children's library and designated bike routes on 75% of the major City streets, Huntington Beach was recently ranked as the top city for children in Southern California. The City has other noteworthy accomplishments such as ranking among the safest in the nation with populations over 100,000, it has one of the lowest unemployment rates, and has been honored as the State's best big city in which to do business. The City has grown quite a bit since its beginnings in 1909. Yet today, with a population approaching 200,000, and a growing commercial and industrial base, Huntington Beach still maintains itself as a great city in which to live, work, and play. At this time, the City intends to use lead -based paint consultant services for -the housing programs described below. The information provided herein about these programs is intended to assist applicants better understand the City's particular needs and to assist with developing fee schedules. The information is not necessarily guaranteed, as number of loan applicants to the City and numbers related to other housing programs are driven by market conditions and are not controlled by the City. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM The City contemplates providing home improvement loans to at least 40 homeowners per year. This program is available to eligible owners of single family homes, mobile homes, condos, and townhomes, and all of these are covered by the new lead -based paint regulation. Loans are typically between $5,000 and $25,000 and may be used for general home improvement projects. Should lead paint hazards be found in a property assisted by the City, remediation activities will be required as specified by law. MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM The City offers a multifamily housing rehabilitation loan program similar to its single family program. Owners of apartment properties in Huntington Beach, which are occupied by low- income tenants, may be eligible to borrow funds for general property rehabilitation projects. The City anticipates administering up to five such loans per year for apartment properties ranging in size from four to twelve units. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING ACQUISITION AND REHABILITATION PROJECTS The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach administers various types of housing projects in partnership with nonprofit and for -profit housing developers whereby apartment properties are purchased and substantially rehabilitated. The Redevelopment Agency anticipates initiating at least six projects per year for properties ranging in size from four to over 100 units. 5 CITY BLOCK GRANT HOUSING PROJECTS From time to time the City's Block Grant program funds rehabilitation or other services related to housing. Such assistance is typically provided for single family homes, group homes, or multifamily properties. Depending on the particular program and the level of funding, lead - based paint activities may be required. Because the Block Grant program funds projects through applications submitted to the City, the number and type of future projects has not been estimated. Each prospective consultant shall submit three (3) copies of all the following requested information. Additional information may be requested upon review of submittals. Consultant Information Identification of the Consultant entity with whom the City would contract for services Evidence of California Department of Health Services Lead Certification Address and ZIP Code Phone and FAX Numbers Name of Contact Person Consultant Team Identify and describe the role of key individuals in the consultant team who would be involved in implementing the various components of the proposal (i.e. Inspection/Risk Assessment, Project Design, Project Monitoring, and Clearance Testing), including their relevant experience, and describe the organizational and functional relationships between the team members. Identify the party who will be responsible and has the authority to make decisions for the consultant team. Qualifications Provide a summary of the Consultant's previous relevant experience for projects of this type, preferably including single family and multifamily housing properties. Describe at a minimum three projects including the date, type of property, services provided, and results. Include information regarding experience working with public agencies. References Provide business references, including city references. For each reference, list the name of a specific contact person, address, telephone number, and nature of the association. Proposal The proposal must include a narrative description of the services proposed for each item described within the Scope of Work section of this request. The narrative should discuss any special requirements necessary to undertake the proposal. In addition, the proposal must contain the following: • A not -to -exceed fee quote to conduct each individual component of the Scope of Work • The date available to start work 0 • A statement that the consultant can provide insurance in the type and amounts required by the City (see enclosed requirements) The consultant selected by the City of Huntington Beach will be required to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City the experience and resources necessary to provide lead -based paint services. Of significant importance in the selection of the consultant is the overall quality of the consultant team as evidenced by previous work, experience working with public agencies, experience with single family and multifamily housing, responsiveness to this request, and price competitiveness. The City of Huntington Beach is committed to providing equal opportunity in the award of contracts, purchasing of services and commodities, and other categories of procurement. It is committed to providing business, loan, and employment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner. In addition, the City is committed to providing opportunities for Huntington Beach firms. The City of Huntington Beach reserves the right to include additional evaluation criteria when reviewing proposals. The City of Huntington Beach intends to review and evaluate the submissions within 14 days of the submission deadline based on the evaluation criteria enumerated above. Leading candidates may be invited to make a presentation to a consultant selection committee. The selected consultant will be asked to enter into an agreement with the City of Huntington Beach. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals. All proposals must be received by 5 pm, April 5, 2001. Submit all copies to: Steve Holtz Economic Development Department City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 5t' Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 If you have any questions regarding this proposal, contact Steve Holtz at (714) 536-5901. 7 BARR & CLARK Independent Environmental Testing ASBESTOS • LEAD • PHASE I August 2, 2001 Lead -Based Paint Inspection/Risk Assessment Procedure The inspection request form is filled out as complete as possible and faxed to Barr & Clark at 310-517-0822. Please fax any additional information such as a scope of work, additional contact numbers, or any other pertinent information. 2. Barr & Clark will schedule the inspection/risk assessment as soon as possible with the homeowner or tenant (usually within 1-3 days ofyour request). Occasionally the inspection may be delayed due to access problems. If we have trouble reaching the homeowner or tenant, our contact at the City of Huntington Beach will be notified. Please do not have the homeowner/tenant or any real estate agents contact us for scheduling. 3. Barr & Clark will proceed with the inspection/risk assessment at the scheduled date and time. We give all of our clients an exact time (not a range of times) and every effort will be made to arrive exactly on schedule. If an unforeseen delay occurs, the homeowner/tenant will be notified as soon as possible. 4. Once the field,%,ork is completed, the information will be processed at our office. Any laboratory samples will be delivered as soon as possible. The. final written report will be ready in approximately 4-5 working days after the completion of the fieldwork. Verbal results may be available sooner (if needed). All reports are shipped out of our office via Priority U.S. Mail to the City of Huntington Beach (not to the homeowner/tenant). One original and one copy of the report will be provided. 5. After the lead abatement (if necessary) is completed and cleaned up, Barr & Clark should be notified by the City of Huntington Beach or the abatement contractor. A final clearance inspection will be performed to ensure that the work was completed as stated in the scope of work and proper cleanup procedures were followed. A copy of the abatement contractor's scope of work should be faxed to Barr & Clark. The homeowner/tenant or real estate agent should not schedule the clearance inspection. 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., a Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 (310) 517-0805 -, Fax: (310) 517-0822 BARR & CLARK Independent Environmental Testing ASBESTOS . LEAD - PHASE l April 5, 2001 Steve Holtz City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Phone: (714) 536-5901 Fax: (714) 375-5087 Re: Proposal For Lead -Based Paint Consulting Services Dear Mr. Holtz: RECEIVED APR 0 5 2001 DEPARTNIENT OF 'f'ONOMIC DRIELOPMEIN- As the impact of the recent changes to the HUD requirements are becoming apparent to municipalities and community based organizations all across the country, we have carefully studied the relevant sections of 24 CFR, section 35 (Title X) to better serve our clients. It is important to be in compliance with the regulations and to reduce complications to an already burdened project. Our knowledge and experience can help to minimize the impact of lead -related considerations affecting your programs. Barr & CIark is pleased bid on the ongoing LBP consulting work for the City of Huntington Beach. The following has been provided per your submission requirements: Consultant Information Barr & Clark Environmental, Inc. 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90505 Phone: (310) 517-0805 Fax: (310)-517-0822 Contact Person: Matt Crochet California DHS Certifications are located in Appendix 1. Consultant Team Robert Clark - President Eleven years experience in environmental assessments and eight years experience in lead -based paint and asbestos related fields. He is an instructor in California and Arizona for the certification of inspectors, contractors and workers. He has participated in a wide range of projects from single family residences and apartments to commercial and industrial structures. His primary efforts are now in the areas of project analysis and abatement design. Certifications include: California Registered Envirorunental Assessor (#06167) State of California Certified Asbestos Consultant (#90-2754) State of California Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor (I 8) State of California Certified Lead Project Designer (D 8) 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 + Torrance, California 90505 (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 Lead Based Paint Consulting Services Proposal for Services — City of Huntington Beach April 5, 2001 Matthew Crochet - Vice President & Project Director, Lead Operations Eight years experience in lead -based paint held inspections, project designs, operations and maintenance plans, and clearance testing. Range of properties dealt with include single family residences, multi -family dwellings (apartments), commercial, industrial, and government owned facilities (military bases, post offices, prisons). Mr. Crochet is a member of the National Lead Abatement Council and the California Association of Certified Lead Professionals (Board Member). Certifications include: State of California Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor (I 12) State of California Certified Lead Abatement Project Monitor (M 12) See Appendix 2 (Statement of Qualifications) for additional key employees. Qualifications Community Development Commission • Type of Projects: Lead Inspections, Design of Abatement Specifications, Risk Assessments, and Clearance Testing for single family residences. • Project Name/Location: Various projects throughout the greater Los Angeles area. • Contact: Bill Pro — CDC — Housing Rehabilitation Loan Programs (323) 890-7240 • Personnel who worked on job: Matt Crochet and Robert Clark • Date completed: Have completed numerous projects throughout 2000 and currently working on several new projects. • Name of Regulatory Oversight Agencies: CDC, DHS, HUD, and CALOSHA. • Description: Services include limited lead inspections, risk assessments, comprehensive lead inspections, abatement specifications, and clearance testing. All services comply with EPA and HUD guidelines. Barr & Clark is currently under contract to perform lead -related services for CDC's Single Family Grant Program, Housing Rehabilitation Loan Programs, and Home Ownership/Home Buyer Program. Park View Apartments • Type of Project: Lead Inspection of 196 Unit Apartment Complex + Retail Shops. Design of Abatement Specifications. • Project Name/Location: Park View Apartments — 622 — 628 S. Alvarado Street, Los Angeles • Contact: Tony Cruz Los Angeles Housing Department -Main Office (213) 367-9085 Page 2 of 7 BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0827 Lead Based Paint Consulting Services Proposal for Services — City of Huntington Beach April 5, 2001 • Management personnel who worked on job: Matt Crochet and Robert Clark • Date completed: 12/ 13/00 • Name of Regulatory Oversight Agencies: DHS, HL-D, and LAHD • Description: A comprehensive lead survey (HUD 1997 Guidelines) was performed at this property. To comply with EPA and HUD guidelines, painted and varnished surfaces in 51 individual units, the exterior of the complex, and common areas were sampled for the presence of LBP. A detailed Lead Based Paint Inspection Report was generated. The report covers the methodology of testing, protocol followed, property description, summary of lead components found, and recommendations. Additionally, a detailed Lead Abatement Specification was developed for this project. The Abatement Specification was developed in a format that may be given to contractors for bidding purposes. Ocean View Accessible Housing • Type of Project: Lead and Asbestos Inspections. Design of Abatement Specifications. • Project Name/Location: Ocean View Accessible Housing — 1525 Euclid, Santa Monica • Contact: Gary Flora — City of Santa Monica/MERL Program (310) 458-2232 • Management personnel who worked on job: Matt Crochet and Robert Clark • Date completed: 01/10/01 • Name of Regulatory Oversight Agencies: DHS, HUD, Office of Historic Preservation, and the City of Santa Monica • Description: A comprehensive lead and asbestos survey was performed at this property. To comply with EPA and HUD guidelines, painted and varnished surfaces in every interior room, the exterior of the building, and common areas were sampled for the presence of LBP. A detailed Lead Based Paint Inspection Report was generated. The report covers the methodology of testing, protocol followed, property description, summary of lead components found, and recommendations. The detailed Asbestos Survey covered the methodology of testing, protocol followed, property description, summary of asbestos containing materials found, and recommendations. Detailed Lead and Asbestos Abatement Specifications were developed for this project. The Abatement Specifications were developed in a format that may be given to contractors for bidding purposes. Additionally, the project's abatement procedure was monitored (for lead and asbestos) until completion and closeout. Page 3 of 7 RARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance. California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 Lead Based Paint Consulting Services Proposal for Services — City of Huntington Beach April S, 2001 Wyvernwood Garden Apartments • Type of Project: Lead and Asbestos Inspections of 1,200 unit apartment complex. Design of Abatement Specifications. • Project Name/Location: Wyvernwood Garden Apartments -- 2901 E. Olympic, Los Angeles • Contact: Tony Austin — Westdale Asset Management (212) 515-7010 • Management personnel who worked on job: Matt Crochet and Robert Clark • Date completed: 12/29/00 • Name of Regulatory Oversight Agencies: DHS, HUD, Office of Historic Preservation, CALOSHA, LA City Attorney's Office, District Attorney's Office, EPA, and the Department of Justice • Description: This project was the result of a complicated legal proceeding and oversight was provided by several regulatory agencies. Comprehensive lead and asbestos surveys were performed at this property. To comply with EPA and HUD guidelines, painted and varnished surfaces in thousands of interior rooms, the exterior of the buildings, and common areas were sampled for the presence of LBP. A detailed Lead Based Paint Inspection Report was generated. The report covers the methodology of testing, protocol followed, property description, summary of lead components found, and recommendations. The detailed Asbestos Survey covered the methodology of testing, protocol followed, property description, summary of asbestos containing materials found, and recommendations. Detailed Lead and Asbestos Abatement Specifications were also developed for this project. The Abatement Specifications were developed in a format that may be given to contractors for bidding purposes. Additionally, the project's abatement procedure was monitored (for lead and asbestos) until completion and closeout. Page 4 of 7 BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Blvd.. • Suite 200 • Torrance. California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-082' Lead Based Paint Consulting Services Proposal for Services — City of Huntington Beach April 5, 2001 References Tony Cruz (213) 367-9085 City of Los Angeles — Housing Department 111 N. Hope Street, 7`' Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Ben Phillips (714) 550-5063 Mercy Charities Housing (1NIon-Profit Organization) 500 S. Main Street, Suite 100 Orange, CA 92868 Gary Flora (310) 458-2232 City of Santa Monica 2121 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 100 Santa Monica, CA 90404 Bill Pro - (323) 890-7248 County of Los Angeles — Community Development Commission 2 Coral Circle Monterey Park, CA 91755 Leo Harris (323) 674-3756x107 NeighborWorks HomeOwnership Center (Non -Profit Organization) 335 Manchester Blvd. Inglewood, CA 90301 Mark Lazzaretto (714) 562-3538 City of Buena Park 6650 Beach Boulevard Buena Park, CA 90622-5009 Additional references are available upon request. Page 5 of 7 BARR & CLARK - 21-850 Crenshaw Bled.. - Suite 200 - Torrance, California 90505 - (310) 517-0805 - Fax: (310) 517-08?? Lead Based Paint Consulting Services Proposal for Services — City of Huntington Beach April S, 2001 Proposal All of the following items are not -to -exceed fee quotes. The date to start work is immediate. All insurance requirements, binders, etc. will be provided. A copy of our Errors and Omissions Insurance (52, 000, 000 aggregate) may be found in Appendix 1. Lead -Based Paint Inspection and Risk Assessment in compliance with 24 CFR 35.930 (d) (Title X) and the relevant chapters of the current version of the HUD Guidelines. Paint testing to be performed using XRF methodology. Homes up to 2,000 square feet Homes greater than 2,000 square feet Apartment units (minimum of 4 units) S 375.00 S 400.00 S 100.00/unit 2. Abatement Specifications (if necessary)— Based upon the results of the lead hazard evaluation and the scope of work for any general rehabilitation. Specifications to be in compliance with 24 CFR 35.930 (d) (Title X) and the relevant chapters of the current version of the HUD Guidelines. • Per structure S 275.00 3. Project rllonitoring (if necessary) —Managing the remediation process (including contractor selection), site visits before, during, and after abatement activities. Closeout package to be prepared at the completion of all lead abatement activities. • Per Project S 55.00/hour (4 hour minimum) 4. Clearance — Conduct clearance inspection and issue abatement certification in compliance with 24 CFR 35.930 (d) (Title X) and the relevant chapters of the current version of the HUD Guidelines. • Per job site visit S 150.00 • Laboratory samples for dust wipe or soil $ 15.00 each 5. Payment - To maintain this pricing level, we have assumed prompt payment for services. All invoices are payable within 30 days of presentation. Additional Information Provided • California DHS Certifications — see Appendix 1 • Insurance Certificate (52,000,000 aggregate) = see Appendix 1 • Statement of Qualifications — see Appendix 2 • Sample Reports. Clearance Inspection — see Appendixr 3 Risk Assessment —.see Appendix 4 Lead Inspection — see Appendix S Page 6 of 7 BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite -200 • Torrance, California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 Lead Based Paint Consulting Services Proposal for Services — City of Huntington Beach April 5, 2001 Barr & Clark is proud of our past accomplishments and we are confident that we can provide timely and cost efficient services to the City of Huntington Beach. If you have any questions or need more information, please call me. Sincerely, Matt Crochet Vice -President ��Okj OF ke4C,,j, 1�14If2 aNk Df2 WU12 \f 'C A . eta/fi rr — Page 7 of 7 BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance. California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 STATE OF CALIFORNLA—NL►LTR AND nr?fAN SERVICES AGENCY CRT PA�'[�. COrY:l+nr DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION BRANCH 15I5 CLAY STREET, SUITE 1801 yr OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510)622-5000 august 8, 2000 Mr. Robert C. Clark Barr & Clark 22850 Crenshaw Boulevard, = 200 Torrance, California 90505 Dear Mr. Clark: Your California Department of Health Services (DHS) Lead Ceril:cate(s) has been renelved. Please note that Four expiration date(s) chan4zed. From this point forward it will be your date of birth. Tyre of Certificate Certificate ID Expiration Date Inspector/Assessor I-8 01/03/2002 Project Designer D-8 01!03/2002 The enclosed cenifcate card/sticker serves as your proofof full certification rene%val by the Deparment. (If you received a sticker, please place it on the a ont left side of Four certificate 1D card, over your name and the old cerifcate information. Donor cover )our photo with the sticker.) Please note that altera.ion of any inforrnat'ton or ftaudulent use of your card./sticker nny result Ln revocation of your certificate. If your card is lost. stolen or inaccurate please notif� DHS immediately. Do not cut up or destroy your card %vhcn your ceritcwe expires. To ensure that. our cenir"cite is renewed before it expires, please submit your next renewal application to the Deparment at least 120 days before the expiration dzte(s) above. Cal! the Lead Related Construction Information Line at I-S00-597-5323 for renewal forms and instructions. (From outside California, tail (5 10) 622-50 72.) If you change your home or mailing address, please notify the Department within 30 days by calling 1-800-597-5323 or by I firing to us at 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1801, Box C, in Oakland, California, 94612. If you fail to notify us of changes in your address, we will be unable to send your certification materials in the future. Thank you for your cooperation and continued efforts in helping to Prevent childhood lead poisoning, $In,*d CWornm Sincerely, Dp�rfmrnr d F'pR1 Sa` s Lead -Related Construction Certificate Robert C. Clark Larrie L. Lance, Dr.P.H., R.E.A., Chief Inspector/assessor. _ Lead Hazard Reduction Section 1-9 (Exp.01103103) is Yr Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch Project Designer �' ' •.. 7 D-3 (Exp. 01/03/02) � �Jt i STATE OF CAUFOILMA—AF.ULTB AND AL-4A4 SER"CES A GL icy GRAY DA VIS, GOvernal, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES _ "Ti1LDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION BRANCH 15 CLAY STREET, SUITE 1801 OAKLAND, CA 94612 (510)622-5000 August 22, 2000 Mr. Matthew P. Crochet Barr &: Clark 22850 Crenshaw Boulevard, K 200 Torrance, California 90505 Dear Mr. Crochet: Your California Department of Health Services (DHS) Lead Certificate(s) has been renewed. Please note that your expiration date(s) changed. From this point forward it will be your date of birth. In addition, since we received your renewal application after the original ex iration date. Your new expiration will reflect less than one year because we cannot provide additional time to those who submit Iate application, Type of Certificate Certificate ID m Expiration Date Inspector/Assessor 1-12 06/13/2001 Project Monitor M-12 06/13/2001 The enclosed certificate card/sticker serves as your proof offull certification renewal by the Department. (If you received a sticker, please place it on the front left side of your certificate ID card, over your name and the old certificate information. Do not cover your photo with the sticker.) Please note that alteration of any information or fraudulent use of your card/sticker my result in revocation of your certificate. If your card is lost, stolen or inaccurate please notify DHS immediately. Do not cut up or destroy your card when your certificate expires. To ensure that your certificate is renewed before it expires, please submit your next renewal application to the Department at least 120 days before the expiration date(s) above. Call the Lead Related Construction Information Line at 1-800-597-5323 for renewal forms and instructions. (From outside_ California, call (510) 622-5072.) If you change your home or mailing address, please notify the Department within 30 days by calling 1-800-597-5323 or by writing to us at 1515 CIay Street, Suite 1801, Box C, in Oakland, California, 94612. If you fail to notify us of changes in your address, we will be unable to send your certification materials in the future. Thank you for your cooperation and continued efforts in helping to prevent childhood lead poisoning. sto. a c.".r,in ow.nm.r. a H..lh s.r.;e.. Lead -Related Construction Certificate Matthew P. Crochet Inspector/Assessor- . '__ I-12 (EX p.flG13101) Project Monitor - - M-12 (Exp. 06/13/01) 4 • - . Sincerely, / 1 Larrie L. Lance, Dr.P.H., R.E.A., Chief Lead Hazard Reduction Section Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch frATe of C-ALMM lA-4a aLTIN AND NUMA19 723rVVEW4 AG J4CY CMAN- DAB 6~rM /V ]DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION BRANCH 1515 CLAY STRTE$T, SLIM 1801 0AKLA.�, CA 94612 (S10} f2LS000 - May 8, 2000 Mr. Jeffrey T. Howard 1440 Princeton Street, #4 Santa Monica, Califxunia 90404 Dear W. Howard: Congratulations! You have satisfied the California Departmrat of Health Services (DHS) lead certification exam requirement (as defied by Tide 17, California Code of Regulations, Section 35001 ct seq.) and have been granted tall certification status for the fallowing certificatc(s): Type of Certificate Inspector/A.tienor Certif car M 1/ I-7602 Expiration Date MWZOD1 Tbc: enclosed sticker/card saves as your proof offull certituation by the Department (If you received a stinker, please place it on the front left side of your certificate ID card over your name and the old certificate inf motion . Do not cover your photo %ith the sticker.) Please we that alteraticm of any infbnuation cr fraudulent use of yaws card/sticker may result in revocation of your certificam. if your lard is lost stolen or inaccurate please notify DHS immediately. E�= cut up or destroy your card when your certificate expires. Please note that your certificate ID =--nber has not changed But your expiration date(&) has changed. To ensure that each full certificate iz remewed before it expires, please subrtit your renewal application to :he Department at least 120 days before the expiration date(s) above. Call the Lead•Relarcd Construction Inforrnation Line at 1-M-597-5323 for renewal forms aad instructions. (From outside California, call (510) 622-5072_) You do not have to take the certification exam again to renew your certificatc(s). If you change your home or mailing address, please notify the Department within 30 days by calling 1-800-597-5323 or by writing to us at 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1801, Box C in Oakland, California, 94612. If you fail to notify us of cht ages in your address, we will be unable to Bead your cerrification materials is the future. 'Thank you fvr your cooperation and continued efforts in helping to prevent childhood lend poisoning. Jeffrey T. Howard State M Cadama Cf�Rrr*a d N•Nh s,rrkes Lead -Related Construction Cartiftcate tM' 1 Sincerely, Larrie L. Lance, Dr.P.H., R.E.A., Chief Lead Hazard Reduction Section Cl iidhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Busch Evanston Insurance Company CWWERML GENERAL LIABILITY DECLARATIONS This policy may contain claims -made sections — please read the entire form carefully POLICY N- MMER: OOPKGO0008 REN'EIVAL. OF: LNSL"RED'S NA.'*4E & ADDRESS: Barr & CIark 23505 Crenshaw Blvd. Torrance, CA 90=05 POLICY PERIOD: FROM: 03/09100 TO: 003/09/02 At 12:00 A.M. Standard Time at) our mailing address sno am above PRODUCER'S N'AAE & ADDRESS Environmental Insurance Services, Inc. 7 77011 200 Cahaba Park South, Ste. 200 Birmingham, AL 35242 tp LN RETURIN FOR THE PAYMENT OF PRE Hi1I, A\1D SLBJECT TO ALL THE TERIIS OF THIS POLICY, WE AGREE NNITH YOU TO PRONTDE THE LNSUR INCE AS STATED LN THIS POLICY. LUMITS OF INSURANCE Environmental Commercial General Liability GENERAL AGGREGATE LIMIT (Ot'ver ;'Ian Products -Completed Oaera;ioas): 'RODUCTS-COMPLETED OPERATIONS AGGREGATE LIMIT: PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY LIMIT: EACH OCCUPUZENCE LIMIT: FIRE DAMAGE LIMIT MEDICAL EXPENSE LIMIT: CONTRACTOR'S POLLUTION LIABILITY EACH POLLUTION CONDITION LIMIT: PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY EACH CLAIM LIMIT: SITE SPECIFIC THRID PARTY POLLUTION LIABILITY EACH CLAIM LIMIT; ADVANCE AN'D DEPOSIT PREVII1-73\14: '�INII+4L''+4 ANNUAL PRE;lIL�l: Retroactive Date for Professional Liability only: 03/09/94 Business Description: Environmental Consultant S 2,000,000. S 1,000,000. S 1,000,000. S 1,000,000- 5 50,000. Ary Ore Fire S 5,000. Ary Ore Person S 1,000,000 S 1,000,000 S N/A FOR11S AND ENDORSEMENTS ATTACHED TO THIS POLICY: C-LOOOI0899 EEIC-06-0100 EEIC-43-0100 1E-0001-0200 IE-0004-0200 IE-000 -0200 IE-4006-0200 IE-0007-0200 IE-0035-0200 IE-0036-0300 IE-0037-0=00 IE-0043-0-00 ILOO17IISS Countersignature (if applicable) A o ,onzed Representative & BARR & CLARK Independent Environmental Testing AS13ESTOS•LEAD • PHASE I STA TEVIENT OF Q UALIFICA TIONS PREPARED FOR Steve Holtz Of City of Huntington Beach 2000 Hain Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., - Suite 200 - Torrance, California 90505 (310) 517-0805 - Fax: (310) 517-0822 The Company Barr & Clark Environmental was founded in 1992 on one basic premise: provide P quality environmental consulting services at a fair and reasonable price. Today's property owners and managers are impacted with an ever-increasing number of environmental regulatory requirements in the day-to-day management of their assets. Barr & Clark offers affordable and practical alternatives to comply with these regulations and requirements. Barr and Clark is recognized by its peers as a leader in performing Lead -Based Paint Inspections, Asbestos Containing Materials Surveys, and Phase I Reports. If your project requires an abatement specification, project design, monitoring, clearance testing, or overall project management, our qualified staff is prepared to meet any of your environmental needs. Clients from over 5,000 projects have included airport facilities, military bases, financial institutions, health departments, housing authorities, correctional facilities, manufacturing plants, renovation/abatement contractors, large apartment complexes, property management companies, and private homeowners. Barr & Clark offers its clients comprehensive and integrated environmental consulting services. Barr & Clark specializes in providing these services in an integrated manner when construction or other events are in progress. It is recognized that the environmental project is often just one of many priorities for the building owner. Whether the other priorities are construction, a loan, or government - assisted funding, the environmental project will always be catered to meet the needs of the client. Over the past nine years, Barr & Clark has gained extensive experience in working with numerous governmental agencies and their respective regulations. These agencies include CAL✓OSHA (DOSH), EPA, CAL/EPA, HUD, DTSC, SQAMD, and DHS. These regulatory agencies each have their own perspective, priorities, and requirements (in some cases, several agencies' requirements may be in conflict with each other). Every environmentally impacted project will involve at least one or more of these agencies. Barr & Clark is known by the key personnel in these agencies and has maintained a positive relationship based on past experiences and mutual cooperation. Knowing the regulations and. the regulators can avoid unanticipated delays and expenses on a project. Barr & Clark's consulting services are designed to facilitate decision -making. Our client's time factors, budget constraints, and overall plan for the property will be considered. Barr & Clark is proud of its ."on time and no surprises" completion of projects. Strict quality control procedures and responsive customer service have earned the devotion of a broad base of clients. When the need for environmental testing or consulting arises, property owners know that Barr & Clark will provide them with a P' quality, integrated, and cost effective strategy. BARR & CLARK - 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., - Suite 200 - Torrance, California 90505 - (310) 517-0805 - Fax: (310) 517-0822 -in Kev Employees Robert Clark - President Eleven years experience in environmental assessments and eight years experience in lead -based paint and asbestos related fields. He is an instructor in California and Arizona for the certification of inspectors, contractors and workers. He has participated in a wide range of projects from single family residences and apartments to commercial and industrial structures. His primary efforts are now in the areas of project analysis and abatement design. Certifications include: California Registered Environmental Assessor (#06167) State of California Certified Asbestos Consultant (#90-2754) State of California Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor (18) State of California Certified Lead Project Designer (D 8) Matthew Crochet - Vice President & Project Director, Lead Operations Eight years experience in lead -based paint field inspections, project designs, operations and maintenance plans, and clearance testing. Range of properties dealt with include single family residences, multi -family dwellings (apartments), commercial, industrial, and government owned facilities (military bases, post offices, prisons). Mr. Crochet is a member of the National Lead Abatement Council and the California Association of Certified Lead Professionals (Board Member). Certifications include: State of California Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor (I 12) State of California Certified Lead Abatement Project Monitor (M 12) Jeffrey Howard - Project Director, Asbestos Operations Six years experience in asbestos consulting, field inspections, and project designs for single family residences, apartment complexes, commercial structures, industrial sites, and school facilities. Mr. Howard is a member of the Environmental Information Association. Certifications include: California Registered Environmental Assessor (#07415) DOSH Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC# 95-1856) NIOSH 582 Equivalent AHERA Certification (All Disciplines) Kristen Williamson - Project Director, Environmental Assessments Six years experience in Phase I environmental assessments and underground tank evaluation. Types of properties involved with these assessments include multi -family housing, commercial, and industrial sites. Ms. Williamson is a member of the Association of Engineering Geologists. Certifications include: California Registered Environmental Assessor (#06451) California Registered Geologist (#6144) BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Bled., • Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 9 (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 IN Insurance Insurance Company: United Capitol Insurance Coverage: Commercial General Liability S 1, 000, 000.00 each occurrence S ?, 000.000.00 aggregate Expiration Date: March 9, 2002 Professional Liability 51,000,000.00 Claims Made Basis (Copies of insurance binders may be obtained upon request.) Website Our web address is www.bctestin2.com. BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite'_00 • Torrance. California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 Re feren CeS HOUSING AUTHORITIES Tony Cruz Los Angeles Housing Department - Main Office 400 S. Main Street, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90013 (213) 367-9085 Steve Cundiff LAHD - East Side Neighborhood Preservation Project 4837 N Huntington Drive, Suite 1 Los Angeles, CA 90042 (323) 225-8687 NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS & PROPERTY DEVELOPERS Sharon Sumpter Lou Bernardi Corridor Economic Development Corp. 600 Corporate Point, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90230 (310) 377-3155 Jose Torres East LA Community Corp. 530 South Boyle Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90033 (323) 269-4214 HEALTH DEPARTMENTS Eleanor Long L. A. County Department of Health Services 510 South Vermont Ave., Room 207 Los Angeles Housing Partnership, Inc. 515 S. Figueroa St., Suite 940 Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 629-9172 Jim Perley Western America Properties 111 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 330 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 (310) 374-4381 Janet Comey Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention 510 South Vermont Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90020 Los Angeles, CA (213) 351-1908 (213) 738-2245 BARR & CLARK • '12850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance. California 90505 • (110) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 BARR & CLARK Independent Environniental Testing ASBESTOS • LEAD • PHASE I April 3, 2001 Mr. Client Community Development Commission 2 Coral Circle Monterey Park, CA 91755 Property Address: 10932 Any Street Barr & Clark Environmental recently visited the property at the above listed address. The purpose was to conduct a Lead Based Paint clearance inspection after the completion of ALL lead -related construction activities. Specialized was the abatement contractor for this job. On November 6, 2000, Robert Clark visually inspected the work and collected two dust wipe samples from the exterior of the residence (window well and threshold). All samples were submitted to the Long Beach Department of Health and Human Services - Laboratory Division, an NVLAP accredited laboratory, to be analyzed for lead content. All work appeared to be completed and no visible dust or paint chips were present at the property. The results from the wipe samples indicated that any residual lead dust that was present after abatement and clean up were below the accepted HTJD/DHS clearance levels (400ml-fil for window wells and exterior surfaces). I have included a copy of the laboratory manifest and results for your files. If you have any further questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, •. 1vo'T°F 4ry„ IIAEW 112 012 Matt Crochet x * q kO M12 i State of California ��'ll �•" -`'# ' Certified Project Monitor (M12) NOTE. This is a SAMPLE "CLEARANCE INSPECTION" prepared especially for the City of Huntington Beach, Department of Economic Development The report was derived from an actual clearance inspection eer the completion and cleanup of all lead -related activities at the subject property. 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 o Torrance, California 90505 (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 ony ocac:ii ueparcn-lerlc of neaan ana human services- L_atDoral:ory uIvlslon -- 525 Grand Avenue Long Beach, Ca 99815 552-570-4077 ANA accreditation # 102620 M I (Nanic) Harr fi Clark Srreer_??,350 Crensh* 131%-t1. Ste.'_00 , Cit-y Tnrrance Zip 90505 Fax:3I01517-03'--'- Ication o(ColleCtiont tvante) Sin,le Family Residence _ Sircei: 10932 _ _ Ckv; S. £1 Monte Zip: Client: Community Development Commission Project 'No.'-01031 .f Material: [XI Dusr Wipe Dam Collected: Date Received: I IIS:00 sr Reatre+red: JXl Lead Content Rclinquished By: Robert Clark Time Collected: Time Received: 11:=0 am ethod of Analysis: [7] EPA 74?0 [x]AST.11 1613(QC) Reporting Unit: S tsg/nioe mple Preparation Method: [x] EPA 30;1(1fic-ot ate) [ RL - less than :eponing li-r-it ,red & Repo,-edh John Luley 11/9/00 Re:;,—Xed Ly � � 11/9/00 Analyir Data Mae,V;.c :ao, QC'iQrl Manager or D: re Bruce pr;iik r ems, Q.-I :,farager --- -ll-ab Report I - AB. NO._ I Sample ID or No. _ __ Dimensions -I Resultslunits edillei[_Colements in inches ug/sq.ft. l 70 1 Q31 DS I Sot side El 1 — win w well 15 US x 17 I 32 Front door threshoW- exterior 3 518 x 24 1 70 ,IAD TEST REQUEST roRINI Page 1/1 omi 051100 DATE MAILED: DATE/TIME FAKED BARB & CLARK ENVIRONMENTAL Project No. 201031 Project Name: Sinale Fancily Residence Client: Community Development Commission Address: 10932 S. El Monte, Date: 10/17100 - 10/17/00 Inspectors: Robert Clark, Mart Crochet, REQUEST FOR LABORATORY SERVICES - DUST SAMPLES No. of Samples Collected r` No. of Samples Submitted Submitted By: Analysis Type: AAS - Report all samples in .Wa 1 ft2 Turn Around: (Circle One) Normal - 24 hr. RUSH - 8 hr. Composite Sample Room: Size of Surface Type: Lab Result (CC) or Number Subsample Floor (pg / ft2) Single Window Sill Surface (inches x Window Well (SS) flO& inches) Exterior C4 PSd2 201031 X r•� x DS 1 x �3 201031 DS 2 _ I _ X _ i x I I r. x I 201031 X DS 3 X x X 201031 X DS 4 X x X 201031 —X- IDS 5 X x x Relinquished By: Name: , I Signature: - Date: Protocol: HUD 97 Reviewed By: Inspector (KRF) or Received By: Name: _ 1-o - Signature: - Date: 1114, Inspector (Scribe) Input By: B ARR & CL ARK Independent Environmental Testing ASBESTOS - LEAD • PHASE l LEAD -BASED PAINT RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT OF - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 10932 ANY STREET S. EL MONTE, CA PROJECT NO. 201031 APRIL 3, 2001 NOTE: This is a SAMPLE "RIS1K'ASSESSMENT" REPORT prepared especially for the City of Huntington Beach, Department of Economic Development. The report was derived from an actual survey of typical housing that was reasonably well maintained Prepared For: Community Development Commission 2 Coral Circle Monterey Park, CA 91755 ,�OFHftrp Prepared By: Matt Crochet State of California Certified Lead Inspector / Risk Assessor Reviewed By: Robert Clark State of California Certified Lead Inspector / Risk Assessor 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., - Suite 200 - Torrance, California 90505 (310) 517-0805 - Fax: (310) 517-0822 IOU TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK........................................................................•-.----...................--•---. 3 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 4.0 INSPECTOR'S QUALIFICATIONS.............................................................................3 5.0 TESTING PROTOCOL..................................................................................................4 6.0 METHOD OF TESTI`TG......................... 7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS..................................................................•--...................._.5 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ 5 9.0 TITLE X REQUIREMENTS...................•--...............---.................................................. 6 10.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS ..................................................................... ... 7 .............. APPENDICES APPENDIX A. XRF TESTING RESULTS APPENDIX B LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS (DUST AND SOIL) APPENDIX C HUD FORMS APPENDIX D INSPECTOR'S CERTIFICATE(S) INSURANCE CERTIFICATE DHS 8552 Project No. 201031 Page 2 of 7 BARR & CLARK 9 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., * Suite 200 • Torrance. California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 Lead Based Paint Risk Assessment Report Single Family Residence 10932 Any Street LEAD -BASED PAINT .RISK ASSESSMENT REPOR T 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of Barr & Clark Environmental's lead -based paint (LBP) risk assessment of the Single Family Residence located at 10932 Any Street, S. El Monte, California (Subject Property). This document is prepared for the sole use of Community Development Commission, and any regulatory agencies that are directly involved in this project. No other party should rely on the information contained herein without prior written consent of Community Development Commission. The scope of services, inspection methodology, and results are presented below. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of this risk assessment is to identify and assess potential lead -based paint (LBP) hazards currently present at the subject property. On 10/17/00, Barr & Clark performed a risk assessment for Iead-based paint at the subject property in S. El Monte, California. Deteriorated paint surfaces, visible dust accumulation, and bare soil were sampled for the presence of lead -based paint (LBP) or Iead dust. The intent was to identify any potential lead - based paint (LBP) hazards currently present at the subject property. If lead -based paint (LBP) hazards were found, the risk assessment would identify individual architectural components or areas of the structure that contribute to the risk. The results can then be used to minimize potential exposure to occupants and manage the risks over time. 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The subject property is a single family residence that was built circa 1945. It is a one-story building that is constructed over a raised foundation: The exterior walls are covered with stucco and the windows are a combination of double -hung sash, fixed, and aluminum -framed types. The home consists of three bedrooms, one bathrooms and a detached garage. At the time of this limited inspection, most of the painted surfaces were in fair condition. 4.0 INSPECTOR'S QUALIFICATIONS Robert Clark and Matt Crochet of Barr & Clark performed the limited inspection at the site using an RMD LPA-1 XRF spectrum analyzer instrument. Both have attended the radiation safety course for handling the instrument, and completed an EPA approved curriculum in Lead in Construction Inspector / Risk Assessor Training.. Page 3 of 7 101031 BARR & CLARK - 22850 Crenshaw Bled., - Suite 200 - Torrance. California 90305 - (310) 517-0805 - Fax: (310) 517-0822 Lead Based Paint Risk Assessment Report .Single Family Residence 10932 Any Street At the time of this report, the California Department of Health Services, Childhood Lead Poisoning Branch, has implemented a State Certification. Model Accreditation Plan adopted from the EPA. Robert Clark and Matt Crochet have received certification. Personnel certificate(s) have been provided in Appendix D. 5.0 TESTING PROTOCOL Regulatory Compliance: Several public (government) agencies have a published "regulatory action level" to classify LBP. To further complicate matters, some of the established "levels" are quantified in different units of measurement. Listed below are the current regulatory agencies that have defined LBP, along with the respective action level: Aizericv HUD/EPA L.A. County OSHA / CAL OSHA Ordinance # 24 CFR 35.86 & 40 CFR 745.103 Title 11. 11.28.010 29 CFR 1926.62 & Title 8, 1532.1 Action level lme / cm' 1.0mg/cm' 0.7mg/cm' Not Specified Action level fnnm) 5,000 ppm 600 ppm" 600 ppm; XRF Testing: Testing of the selected painted surfaces was patterned after the inspection protocol in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing. Testing is in compliance with Federal Regulations 24CFR Part 35, Subpart J for rehabilitation activities. In recognition of the various action levels the testing results are classified as follows for this report: • Painted surfaces with readings at or above 0.7 mg / cm2 are considered - Positive • Painted surfaces with readings at or below 0.6 mg / cm' are considered - Negative The individual readings have been provided on all field data sheets. Any future change in action levels by one of the regulating agencies may affect the classification of results. Dust Wipe Sampling: The HUD action level for lead dust is 40 µg/ft1 forJloors, 250µg/ft? for window sills, 400 µg If?for window wells, and 400 pg /ft1 for exterior surfaces. Soil Sampling: The California DHS action level for le -ad in soil is 400 parts per million (ppm) for bare soil and 1000 ppm for soil covered with vegetation (ground cover, grass, etc.). 6.0 METHOD OF TESTING Paint Testing: The method employed was X-ray fluorescence (XRF) using a Radiation Monitoring Device Lead Paint Analyzer (RMD LPA-1). The instrument was operated in "Quick Mode," where the duration for each test result is determined by a combination of: • the actual reading relative to the designated action level; Page 4 of 7 201031 BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Bled., • Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 Lead Based Paint Risk Assessment Report x Single Family Residence 10932 Any Street • the age of the radioactive source; and • the substrate on which the test was taken. The instrument's calibration was verified according to the manufacturer's specifications in compliance with the Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) developed for this instrument. Laboratory Sample Analysis: Soil and dust samples were collected from this property and analyzed for lead content by the Long Beach Health Department — Laboratory Division, which is accredited by the American Industrial Association (AIHA), the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NVL.AP) and the California Department of Health Services (FLAP). The samples were analyzed as follows: • Dust Wipe Sampling - The method of analysis was Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (OSHA ID-121, Flame AA) performed on samples collected from measured areas. • Soil Samplint; - The method of analysis was Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (SW-486, flame AA) performed on samples collected from the top VY' of bare soil areas (drip line. etc.). 7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Paint Sampling: Throughout the subject property, the test results indicated the presence of lead -based paint (LBP) related hazards. The following summary lists the locations of these hazards: Exterior • Door frame and threshold to the living room • Wooden window components on the west side of the home The XRF field data and results for paint sampling may be found in Appendix A. Dust/Soil Sampling: None of the laboratory samples were above the respective action levels. The dust wipe and soil sampling results may be found in Appendix B. Sampling for this risk assessment was based on the condition of the individual building components at the time of this inspection. 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The greatest potential for lead exposure from lead painted architectural components occurs when: • the paint has become defective; or • when the paint is applied to a friction / impact component where the paint is continually disturbed; or • when the paint is disturbed through routine maintenance or renovation activities. Page 5 of 7 101031 BARR & CLARK * 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 5I7-0822 Lead Based Paint Risk Assessment Report Single Family Residence 10932 Any Street With this in mind, the following are our recommendations for this property: • The results from this limited inspection should be provided to any individuals that may disturb the painted surfaces. It is encoura ed to utilize professionals that have experience working with LBP. • If renovation is scheduled in the near future (less than three months), all lead painted components that have been previously targeted for replacement should be replaced utilizing "lead safe" containment and work practices. • ALL components that have been identified with defective lead paint should have the paint repaired as soon as possible. Any paint repair should be done utilizing "lead safe" containment, work practices, and clean-up techniques. • All components with lead painted friction 1 impact surfaces should be treated to minimize the friction or impact as necessary. • Lead painted components that have not been targeted for replacement should either be considered for abatement (replacement, enclosure, encapsulation, etc.) or included in an Operations & Management (O & M) Plan that will help to minimize exposures to lead hazards. • All lead painted surfaces that are not expected to be impacted in the near future (less than three months) should also be included the O & M plan. • In addition, the tenants or occupants of the dwelling should be notified of the test results and instructed in actions that they may perform to keep the living areas "lead safe." Reevaluation: Standard Reevaluation Schedule 3 contained in the HUD Guidelines applies to this property, since several exterior components had XRF lead levels greater than the standard. Therefore, the dwelling should be reevaluated in October 2001 (12 months from now). If no lead -based paint hazards are identified at that time, another reevaluation should be conducted in October 2002 (2 years later). If no lead -based paint hazards are identified at that time, no further reevaluations are needed. However, since lead -based paint may be present in the dwelling, the owner should monitor the condition of all painted surfaces at least annually or whenever other information indicates a potential problem. 9.0 TITLE X REQUIREMENTS A copy (or summary) of this report must be provided to new lessees (tenants) and purchasers of this property under Federal law (24 CFR part 35 and 40 CFR part 745) before they become obligated under a lease or sales contract. The complete report must also be provided to new purchasers and it must be made available to new tenants. Landlords (lessors) and sellers are also required to distribute an educational pamphlet approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and include standard warming language in their leases or sales contracts to ensure that parents have the information they need to protect their children from lead -based paint hazards. This report should be maintained and updated as a permanent maintenance record for this property. Page 6 of 7 201031 BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Bl%-d., • Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 Lead Based Paint Risk Assessment Report Single Family Residence 10932 Any Street 10.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS This limited inspection / risk assessment was planned, developed, and implemented based on Barr & Clark's previous experience in performing lead -based paint risk assessments. This risk assessment was patterned after Chapter 5 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing (1997 Revision). Barr & Clark utilized state -of -the -art -practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards while performing this limited inspection. Barr & Clark's evaluation of the relative risk of exposure to lead identified during this limited inspection is based on conditions observed at the time of the limited inspection. Barr & Clark cannot be responsible for changing conditions that may alter the relative exposure risk or for future changes in accepted methodology. It is important to note that other lead based paint surfaces may exist in this structure but were not identified and sampled. Enclosed are the actual test results and all relevant certifications/licenses. i Parts per million ii Applies to sale and application of LSP. iii Applies to construction related activities 1997 Revision Page 7 of 7 201031 BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Far: (310) 517-0822 SUMMARY OF INTERIOR Project Name: Single Family Residence Project Number: 201031 Address: 10932 Any Street S.- FI Monte, CA Component Number Number Number Percent Tested Positive Percent Positive Negative Negative Plaster Ceiling 3 3 100.00% Plaster Wall 10 10 100.006% Wood Cabinet Door 2 2 100.000". Wood Cabinet Frame 2 2 100.006". Wood Cabinet Shelf 2 2 1do. 00°0 Wood Closet Door Frame 1 1 100.000"" Wood Door 3 3 100.003% Wood Door Frame 4 4 100.00%, Wood Window Frame 3 3 10D.00 Wood Window Sash 3 3 100.00°70 Wood Window Sill 2 2 100.00°/, Totals: 35 0 35 Testing done in compliance with current L.A. County DNS guidelines for XRF. Barr & Clark Environmental (310) 517-0605 1 3/8/2001 9:50:31AM SUMMARY OF EXTERIOR Project Name: Single Family Residence Project Number: 201031 Address: 10932 Any Street S. El Monte, CA Component Number Number Number Percent Vested Positive Percent Positive Negative Negative Metal Downspout 1 1 100.00% Metal Electrical Panel 1 1 100.00% Metal Gutter 1 1 100.00°/a Stucco Wall 6 6 100.00 io Wood Column 1 1 100.00% Wood Door 2 2 100.00% Wood Door Frame 2 1 50.00% 1 50.00% Wood Garage Door Frame 1 1 1MY00% Wood Roof Trim 10 10 100.00% Wood Threshhold 1 1 100.00% Wood Window Frame 4 2 50.00%. 2 50.00% Wood Window Sash 4 2 50.00% 2 50.00% Wood Window Well 5 2' 40.00% 3 60.00% Totals: 39 8 31 Testing done in compliance with current L.A. County DHS guidelines for XRF. Barr & Clark Environmental (310) 517-0805 2 3/8/2001 9:50:31AM CONTAIIvIING COMPONENTS LIST Exterior Lead Containing Components List Project Name: Single Family Residence Project ID: 201031 Address: 10932 Any Street S. El Monte, CA Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 2 Wood Door Frame ::.: = . ..: : Living Room.,.- 1.0 -POSITIVE ;`. ' DAMAGED 3 .Wood Thrdshholcf .:: .,: , : Living Room : :: .: :.` -,.:1.2 POSITIVE °..: DAMAGED: :: = 59 D1 Wood Window Frame Perimeter West Side 1.3 POSITIVE ..DAMAGED Double Hung. 62 D2 Wood Window Frame Perimeter West Side . 1.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung' . 58 �~D1 Wood Window Sash Perimeter West Side 1.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung 61 D2 Wood Window Sash Perimeter West Side 1.0 POSITIVE : DAMAGED Double Hung 57 D1 Wood Window Well Perimeter West Side 1.3 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung 60 D2 Wood Window Well Perimeter West Side 1.3 POSITIVE. DAMAGED Double Hung L.A. County OHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 nig/cm2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mg/cm2. Barr & Clark Environmental (310) 517-0805 1 of 1. 3/8/2001 9.50:38AM FIELD DATA FIELD DATA REPORT Project Name: Single Family Residence Address: 10932 Any Street S. El Monte, CA Project Number: 201031 Protocol: L4 County Sample Unit ID r Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 1 Exterior Living Room Door Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negative - 2 Door Frame Wood DAMAGED.: . 1.0 ' POSITIVE 3 Threshhold-: -. Wood DAMAGED ' . 1.2 POSITIVE 4 Interior Living Room D Door Wood DAMAGED 0.3 Negative 5 D Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 6 A Window Silt Wood DAMAGED 0.0 Negative Double Hung 7 A Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negalive Double Hung 8 - A Window Frame - Wood DAMAGED 0.3 Negative Double Hung 9 0 Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 10 Interior Hall B Cabinet Frame Wood DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 11 3 Cabinet Door Wood DAMAGED 0.0 - Negative 12 a Cabinet Shelf Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 13 - A Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 14 R Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.3 Negative _ 15 C Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.0 Negalive 16 _ D Wall Piaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 17 - Ceiling Plaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 18 Interior Bedroom 1 C Door Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 19 - 20 21 C A C Door Frame Wall Wall Wood Plaster Plaster DAMAGED DAMAGED DAMAGED 0.1 0.2 0.2 Negative Negative Negative - 22 0 Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 23 _ a Plaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negatfve R 24 Interior Bedroom 2 D _Ceiling Door Wood DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 25 D Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 0.6 Negative 26 - Interior Bedroom 3 A Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 0.1 Negative Door Missing 27 B Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 0.3 Negative Double Hung 28 - - �D Window Frame Wood DAMAGED 0.1 Negative Double Hung 29 _ D Closet Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 30 BJ-Wall Plaster DAMAGED 10 Negative 31 C Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negative _ 32 Interior Bathroom Ceiling Plaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 33 Interior Kitchen _ D Window Sill Wood DAMAGED 0.1 Double Hung 34 T _ ❑ Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 0.1J _Negative Negative Double Hung L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mglcm2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mglcm2. r,...... o -i-r want f;e-r non 1 of 1 31P12.nni 9750'40AA.4 FIELD DATA REPORT Project Name: Single Family Residence Address: 10932 Any Street S. El Monte, CA Project Number: 201031 Protocol: LA County Sample Unit ID 1 Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 35 Interior Kitchen D Window Frame Wood DAMAGED -0.2 Negative Double Hung 36 C Cabinet Frame Wood DAMAGED 0.2 NegaGve _ 37 C Cabinet Door - Wood-- DAMAGED 0.0 Negative -_38 C Cabinet Shelf Wood DAMAGED 0.3 Negative 39 Perimeter Exterior North Side -�A�-Window __ Well _ Wood_ DAMAGED 0.2 Negative Fixed _ 40 A Wall Stucco_ DAMAGED 0.2 Negative - -- -- 41 _---.__--_---_------ A Roof Trim--- Wood DAMAGED 0.3 Negative--- --- 42 -- _____--~--•._-- A Roof Trim Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negative A 43 A Column Wood DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 44 Exterior East Side B2 Window Well Wood DAMAGED 0.1 Negative Double Hung 45 - 82 Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 0.4 Negative Double Hung 46 - --�� B2 Window Frame Wood -DAMAGED 0.1 Negative Double Hung 47 B--VVaI! Stucco DAMAGED 0.3 Negative 48 B Roof Trim Wood DAMAGED 0.2 - Negative _ ------ 49 --- ---- - -B Roof Trim ----Wood -__-•-DAMAGED- 0.1 Negative - ----- __ 50 -^- Exterior South Side - C Window Well - Wood --wood DAMAGED 0.3 Negative Double Hung 51 C window sash DAMAGED 0.2 Negative Double Hung Y C Window Frame Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negative Double Hung _5_2 _ _ _ 53 - - - - .......... ~C~ Wall --�� Stucco DAMAGED 0.1 Negative - _--- 54 ---,- - -� -� C Roof Trim-- Wood DAMAGED 0.3 Negative _T 55 _ _ - - _ -- C Roof Trim - Wood - DAMAGED 0.0 Negative _ -- 56 C Electrical Panel Metal - DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 57-- Exterior West Side D1- YWindow Well Wood DAMAGED 1.3 POSITIVE Double Hung 58 - - - ---- -59 - - --� ------ - -- D1 Window Sash -Wood---- DAMAGED 1.2 POSITIVE Hung 01 Window Frame - -- -Wood DAMAGED 1.3 POSITIVE- _Double Double Hung - -- 60 02 Window Well Wood DAMAGED 1.3 POSITIVE Double Hun !_- 61 -62 -- - -� _ --- -�.- 02 _- Window Sash - Wood DAMAGED 1.0 POSITIVE . Double Hung _ D2 Window Frame -Wood- DAMAGED 1.0 POSITIVE _ Double Hung --- 63 - ------ _- _ D Wall_ _ _-- Stucco- DAMAGED 0.3 64 --- -65 _ - D Roof Trim -- Wood DAMAGED 0.1 _Negative Negative -- -_ -_ Garage - - ~-- Exterior Perimeter ---- - - - A _-- TDoor Door - -^ - Wood- - - DAMAGED 0.1 Negative - - 66 - ---_-__--•--_- A Frame Wood DAMAGED Negative -- -- 67 ^---- --_- A Wall -- _ Sl:,cco ----DAMAGED _0.3 0.2 Negative - .�._.68 ----- _ _---- - --- -------------B.-- Wall ^ Stucco .-- DAMAGED 0.2- Negative --- - L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mg/cm2. Positive is defined as XRF Sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mg/cm2. Rarr R. rint-k Fnvirnrtrt,r.nfal 0101 .517-0805 2 of ;i - 3/812001 9::i0A0Af,1 FIELD DATA REPORT Project Name: Single Family Residence Address: 10932 Any Street S. El Monte, CA Project Number: 201031 Protocol: LA County Sampie Unit ID / Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 69 Garage Exterior Perimeter A Roof Trim Wood DAMAGED -0.1 Negative _ 70 BTRoof Trim Wood DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 71 C Roof Trim Wood DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 72 A Garage Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 73 A Gutter_ Metal DAMAGED 0.3 Negative 74 A Downspout Metal Intact 0.1 Negative L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mg/cm2. Positive is defined as XRf= sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mg/cni2. ...,i /'l4n1 r,w-7 nonr, q of'1 3/8/2001 9:50:40Aft4 BARR & CLA.RK ENVIRONMENTAL Project No. 201031 Client: Community Development Commission Date: 10/1WOO - 10/17/00 Project Name : Single Family Residence Address: 10932 S. El Monte, Inspectors: Robert Clark, Matt Crochet, REQUEST FOR LABORATORY SERVICES - DUST SAMPLES No. of Samples Collected No. of Samples Submitted Submitted By: Analysis Type: AAS - Report all samples in fag / ft2 Turn Around: (Circle One) Normal - 24 hr. RUSH - 8 hr. Composite Sample Room: Size of Surface Typee Lab Result (CC) or Number Subsample Floor (pg ft2) Single Window Sill Surface (inches x Window Well (SS) inches) Exterior 201031 C �v-r�� X DS1 snl rj'?e'&XSC! X .�r•i ° x 201031 X 2/+ `DS Z x ,. _ ?q X 201031 X i D S 3- X ,- �= X x 201031 DS 4 _-� x n x X { X r 201031 x IDS 5 x T� x - Relinquished By: Name: AP 'f L,d^'rc Signature: - f 'k- ("�'/ Date: /I r/) `0-!" Received By: Name: Signature: Date: Protocol: SFR Screen Reviewed By: Inspector (YRF) Inspector (Scribe) Input By: BARR & CEAR K ENVIRONMENTAL Pralect No. 2DID31 Psy'ert Name: Single Family Rcsldence Ctisn� Co==iairyDevc1opmvu Cmnjrsssioa Adk-ccs: 10932 S. El Monte, FFlEre; I047M - 10117/00 Inspcctars; Robot Cluk. Matt Crochc% REQUEST FOR LABORATORY SERVICES - GUST SAMPLES No. of Samples Collected No, of Samples Submitted t Submitted By:a�- Analysis Type: - Reporf all _sam�ks in u� 1 f� Tum Around: (Circle one) Nda _24 rRUSH - 0 hr, COmpoSRS Sample R!20m: Size of SurfaCe Type Lab Result .(CC) or Numb r Subsample Floor ..Single Mindow Sill -Surface (inches x Window Well .(SS) Inches) Exterior 201031 DS S f'�rs (- s/C.' x 3 x a.7 SJ `�` ✓J t f � =� .� �o �v 6 la x 201031------ x r DS 7 x x MOM x DS 8 x �x x 201031 x DS 9 x x x 201031 .- - _ x Oslo x x Relinquished By: f Slgn titre: � •�" I ',�.f Data: h -0 pratocDI:SERScreen R-4•icwrd1<y: Insrector(XRF) 3 Recelved By: Name: Signature: Date: I%`?ccwr (SCric%') anpi t By. L-Ul its LJOGJt.11 L -GVLi1 6113%.186 vI 1 rti+... 2525 Grand Avenue long Beach, Ca 90815 562-570-4077 ANA accreditation # 102620 R 'EM MJ : (il ulhcr (Numr) n2rr a Clark Fnvirenmeneml Sheer. 23505 Crenthaw_Blvd, ClrrTarranec Zip 71350 FIX: 310. 5) 7.0 V2 1-+Ref,.n nf!`nlirrline: {]1nmC) Simple F2mily Reildence - Street: 14932 _ , ,_,-,�Ciip: S. F1binntr _ zip Clf, mr. Community Devettirpmem Commission Project No. 201031 J= or m. ttmiai: 1X1 Ault Wipe Date CoUecltd: 10117M Dote Received: 10/17l00 Ttst Retraen d: 1XI Lead Content Coilcctcd Sy: R Clark Time CoUeMd: '[ ime Rm1ved: 1:37 pm Method of AnaMis: E--] EPA 7410 [xJAT%U 1613 (Q1 Reporting Limit: 3 ug/wiyc Sample Prepimdoe Method: [x) EPA 30Ji f WCrm -x) <r.1. - leu [ rtpa:cirg ^7i{ ©I rnred&ReP0?-rdi? J52kn -nl 10/1$/00 -- - ---12c�irariiy z� f•:L•nLu:<y,orelfximSboemeker.Ara5-st Dire ,u_a.-.Vkjido,QOVAKanarh r or Dc:e Ervice rxpj6r-w. QA ,1,t,. agff LAB. NO. J Sample ID or No. _ (Dimensions l Results/units Sgrrfmrn Cowrtr.LS _ in Inch S 00 i o 1 00 P]33479 1 201031 DS 2 BR fl 1_- flolr1 12 x 12 f <RL _.._ OD PIi3480 201031 DS I RR *1 — sill -„ I 4 x 74 1 <RL 00 PB3481 1201031 DS 4 BR i12 - flatir I 12 x 12 I <RT.,_, 60 M482 1 201031 DS S RR # 2 - sil1 _ 1 4 x24_-_- I _ „<RL On i I 201011 J)S West e' -- w' w I 'A X29 ! t 89 LEAD TEST REQUEST Page i/1 Form 04100(f I ��t��[�: COf � r�tErtt�,EF:r.�� ! 1L1�1i TOTAL_ A.01 BARB & CLARK ENVIRONMENTAL Project No. 201031 Project Nam-, : Sin-0le Family Residence 10i Client: Community Development Comnussion Address: 10932 S. El Monte, )ate: 10/17100 - 10/17/00 Inspectors: Robert Clark, Matt C.-ocliet, REQUEST FOR LABORATORY SERVICES - SOIL SAMPLES No. of Samples Collected No. of Samples Submitted Submitted By: Analysis Type: AAS - Report all samples ppm Turn Around: (Circle One) Normal - 24 hr.. RUSH - 8 hr. Composite (CC) or Single Surface (SS) Sample Number Area: Number of Subsamples Surface Type: Bare Soil Drip Line Play Area Lab Result (ppm) or (mg 1 kg) 201031 SS SG 2011031 SS 201031 SS 201031 SS 201031 SS5 Relinquished By: Name: Signature: )ate: Received By: Name: Signature: Date: Protocol: SFR Screen Reviewed By: 1zispecror(XRF)_ Inspector (Scribe} Input By: Department of Health and Human Services- Laboratory Division — 2525 Grand Avenue Long Beach, Ca 90815 ANA (ELLAP) accreditation no. 102620 562-.,-Q..;o;; 'l" hill F.R: (Nattte) Barr lark m-i onm n a Street.. 2_ 505 Crenshgw [3h'd Cirt•: Torrance Zip 40505 Fax 3i0.s17.022 .ncation of COcrtinn: (,Vane) SinsS, Family Residence _Sfreer: Cirr: Zip Client: Communiry Development Commission Project No. N1031 _ . fir Vaterill: I\l Soil Date Collecled: 10i1;;00 Date Received: 14/k7;00 reef RMUCSted: I\I Lead Content Collected 9v: Robert Carl• Timr Collected: Time Received: 1:37 P)l rtethod of Analysis: W EPA 7420 (xIAST.1f 1613 (QQ Reporting Limit: 60 ppm ample Prtparation Mahod: (x} EPA M51 <RL < less than Reporting Limit efred & Reported h Johnr 1 v 10/1 /00 Rear-ed iry Analyst Date diae'\ika:do, QC/QA .r;.merger or Dare 8rt1Ce Frtjt,F=-d, Q.-I Mt -?'.Trier -- -- —————— ——— — -- — —— ——— — — —€Gab Report _AB. NO. I Sam tp e ID or No. I Dirrenslons I Results/units ,rt•: [it€let[ Cal€rk€se€ktS_ P133434 1201031 - North . i ei cuinpositubsamples ! dri lire I <R LEAD TEST REQUEST FORINI Pa,e 1/ 1 Forth 040300 DATE MAILED: �G// _ _ ©ATUTIME FAX[a n U 1�p Chapter 5: Risk Assessment 4�+' Form 5.1 Building Condition Form Condition Yes No Roof missing parts of surfaces (tiles, boards, shakes, etc.) Roof has holes or large cracks Gutters or downspouts broken Chimney masonry cracked, bricks loose or missing, obviously out of plumb Exterior or inferior walls have obvious large cracks or holes, requiring more than routine pointing (if masonry) or paining Exterior siding has missing boards or shingles Water stains on interior walls or ceilings k Flaster %galls or ceilings deteriorated i wo or more windows or doors broken, missina, or boarded up Porch or steps have major elements broken, missing, or boarded up Foundation has major cracks, missing materiel, structure leans, or visibly unsound Total number If the "Yes' column has tutu or more checks, the dY.eilina is usualfy considered to be in poor cond:tion for the rurposes of a rs{ assessment. However, specific conditions and extenUc:ing circumstances sh,culd be considered ~before de"erm"ning the final condition of the dr:e!ling and the appropria!er.ass of a lead hazard screen. Notes: 5-4 4 cDO �n,1 ego Chapter 5: Risk Assessment Form 5.2 Paint Conditions on Selected Surfaces (Single -Family, Owner -Occupied) Building component Location Notes Paint condition (intact, fair, poor, or not present) to be completed by risk assessor Deterioration due to friction or impact? Deterioration due to moisture? Location: of painted component with visible bite marks j Building siding Exterior trim Exterior windows I rQ r /Z1 c� lt'fl Exterior doors Railings Porch floors Other porch surfaces Interior doors Ceilings /L Walls � • ��'� jv) Interiorwindo��rs r ,/ 1 ) /D ,'vo Interior floors I I I Interior trim stain'eays Radiator (or radiator cover) Kitchen cabinets / l) Bathroom cabinets % -( %L AA0 AAD y Other surfaces: I - I li the overall ccnciiticn of a cerinpocera is sirilar throuchout a dv;el:ino, that condaicrl should be rEccrded. If a component in a couple of locations is in poor ccnd:;ion, but the overall ccndition is good or 'air, the specific saes of the badly defEriofaled paint shd ou,be ncled. The specific locations cf any component v;iith bile marks shLuld be rEccrded. 5-Y s (�vl0_�/ Sia:e of Caldoma.Hea:ih and We::are Agency DepprMeni or He?"ih Sernces LEAD HAZARD EVALUATION REPORT section 1-Date of Lead Hazard Evaluation 10/17/00 Section 2-Type of Lead Hazard Evaluation (Check one box only) Lead inspection 2 Risk assessment ❑ Clearance inspection Section 3-Structure Where Lead Hazard Evaluation Was Conducted Address (number, street, apartment (if applicable) City County 10932 1 S. El Monte ❑ Other (specify) ZIP ccde Construction date (year) of Type of structure (check one box only) structure Unknown p Single family dwelling 0 Multi -unit building O Child -occupied facility O Other (specify) Section 4-Owner of Structure fif business/aaencv, list contact oerson) Name Telephone number Community Development Commission 3238907240 Address (number, street, apartment (if applicable) City State Z`IP code 2 Coral Circle Monterey Park CA 91755 Section 5-Results of Lead hazard evaluation (UneCK one qox only) ❑ No lead -based paint detected. A lead inspection was conducted following the procedures outlined in Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 8. No lead -based paint was detected during this lead inspection. This structure is found to be lead -based paint free. ❑ No lead hazards detected. Lead hazard evaluation was conducted following the procedures outlined in Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 8. No lead hazards were detected. IXI Lead -based paint and/or lead hazards detected. Lead hazard evaluation was conducted following the procedures outlines in Title 17, California Code of Regulations. Division 1, Chapter 8. Lead -based paint and/or lead hazards were detected. Section 6-Individual Conducting Lead Hazard Evaluation Name Telephone number Robert Clark 310-517-0505 Address (number, street, apartment (if applicable) City State ZIP code 22850 Crenshaw Blvd. Suite 200 Torrance CA 90505 Brand name and serial number of any portable x-ray fluorescence (XRF) instrument used (if applicable) RMD DHS certification number Signature Date Section 7-Attachments A. A foundation diagram or sketch of the structure indicating the specific locations of each lead hazard or presence of lead -based paint: B. Each testing method, device, and sampling procedure used; C. All data collected, including quality control data, laboratory results, including laboratory name, address, and phone number. First copy and attachments retained by inspector Second copy and attachments retained by owner Third copy only (no attachments) mailed to: OHS 0552 (12197) Department of Health Services Chi!dhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch Reports 1515 Clay Street. No. 1801 Oakland, CA 94612 STATE OF CALIFOR*,IA-1[EALn1 AND [It MAN 5ERV1CUC AGENCY f.H�l" n��'[S. Gm•irnar DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION BRANCH 1515 CLAY STREET, SUITE ISOI OAKL.A\D, CA 94612 (510)622-5000 ,august 5, 2000 Mr. Robert C. Clark Barr R Clark 22850 Crenshaw Boulevard, = 200 Torrance, California 90505 Dear Mr. Clark: Your California Department of Health Services (DHS) Lead Certificate(s) has been retie,, ed. Please note that Your expiration date(s) changed. From this point forward it will be your date of birth. Type of Certificate Ceni icate ID a Expiration Date Inspector/Assessor I-8 OI/03/2003 Project Designer D-8 OI:'03/2002 The enclosed certificate card'stic er sen'es as "our proof of full certification renewal by the Department. (If you received a sticker, please place it on the font left side of}our certificate ID card, over your name and the old certificate information. Do not cover your phoro with the sticker.) Please rote that alteration of any information or fraudulent use of your car d lsticker my result in revocarion of your certificate. If your card is lost, stolen or kiaccurate please notify DHS i:ninediatel.y. Do not cut up or destroy Four card when your certificate expires. - To ensure that your certificate is renewed before it expires. please submit vour Pest rene%val application to the Department at least 120 days before the expiration date(s) above. Cail the Lead Related Construction Information Line at 1-500-597-5323 for renewal forms and instructions. {From outside California, call (510) 622-5072.) If you change your home or mailing address, please notify the Department within 30 days by calllna 1-800-597-5323 or by writing to us at 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1801, Box C, in Oakland, California, 94612. 1f you fail to notify us of changes in your address, we will be unable to send your certification materials in the future. Thank you for your cooperation and continued efforts in helping to prevent childhood lead poisoning. SWO GF CA—"C'Mi. Sincereiv, Dewl'nWn d H..th selic.. Lead Related Construction Certificate Robert C. Clark Larrie L. Lance, Dr.P.H., R.E.A., Chief InspectorfAssessor. Lead Hazard Reduction Section I-8 (Exp. 01/03/02) Childhood Lead Poison;ng Pre%ention Branch Project Designer D-8 (Exp. 01/03/02) ' STATE OF CALIFOP-NIA—HEALTH AND HUMAN SMICES AGENCY GRAY DA%IS. GOVernor DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES _ "!-ULDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION BRANCH AS CLAY STREET, SUITE 1801 }' . OAKI.AND, CA 94612 (510)622-5000 August 22, 2000 Mr. Matthew P. Crochet Barr & Clark 22850 Crenshaw Boulevard, M 200 Torrance, California 90505 Dear Mr. Crochet: Your California Department of Health Services (DHS) Lead Certificate(s) has been renewed. Please note that your expiration dates chart ed. From this Point forward it will be your date of birth. In addition, since we received vour renewal application after the original expiration date, vour new expiration will reflect less than one vear because we cannot Rravide additional time to those who submit late application. Type of Certificate Certificate ID 4 Expiration Date Inspector/Assessor I-12 06/13/2001 Project Monitor M-12 06/13/2001 The enclosed certificate card/sticker serves as your proof offull certification renewal by the Department, (If you received a sticker, please place it on the front left side of your certificate ID card, over your name and the old certificate information. Do not cover your photo with the sticker.) Please note that alteration of any information or fraudulent use of your card/sticker my result in revocation of your certificate. If your card is lost, stolen or inaccurate please notify DHS immediately. Do not cut up or destroy your card when your certificate expires. To ensure that your certificate is renewed before it expires, please submit your next renewal application to the Department at Ieast 120 days before the expiration date(s) above. Call the Lead Related Construction Information Line at 1-800-597-5323 for renewal forms and instructions. (From outside. California, call (510) 622-5072.) If you change your home or mailing address, please notify the Department within 30 days by calling 1-800-597-5323 or by writing to us at 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1801, Box C, in Oakland, California, 94612. If you fail to notify us of changes in your address, we will be unable to send your certification materials in the future. Thank you for your cooperation and continued efforts in helping to prevent childhood lead poisoning. see. d c.aw M NPu4+N d Hwth S. Lead -Related Construction Certifteate Matthew P. Crochet Inspector/Assessor. I-12 (Exp. 06113101) ` Project Monitor -- NI-12 (Exp: 06/13101) Sincerely, Larrie L. Lance, Dr.P.H., R.E.A., Chief Lead Hazard Reduction Section Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch WESTERN REGIONAL LEm) TRAINING CENTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CAU FORMA, SAN DIEGO 15MAYONZ-2 0F5C=�,=• SAX D•=o, CA 92128. 1•SD4572•L.E!,1U This is io vcrify Thor A0BE-RT CUM hru srccemfully ecmNleicti 24 hours of b Vr:luton i,i LEAD INSPECTOR TRAINING rrI �, 1992 1+' • t 6 119G2 EPA DdC--;c; ri;CUOr Ctnifica.m No. UN1VER,cv-*-').iT'4' Ole' CALIFORNIA UNIVERSTTY EXTENSION, DAVIS Western Regional Lead Training Center IN RECOGNZTZON THAT Matt Crochet: HAS .ATTENDED TRC- FOLLOWING PROGRAM F--,i.nA-Sp onsored Lead lnspectors Training March 14 - 7.62 1994 Passed final. exam Certificate Number 1078 Lead Abatement fro cam Niana er 11 -X t!r �r%h'r" w�rjVIP N, "j, Ak 01 :M42, M�M'�.AAAW.PX WFdMMM �� ML..WZM -M.Mk 7Z on the 28th day ot RfflUary Y-1410 SUccessFully completed the factory training for RMD's LPA- I Lead Pali -it Inspection System 11 Aling, but not finlited to, thc topics o-Madiallon Saflety and the Proper Use of. "the Instrument. AL -44 Paster, Vice President, RMD [it St., Watertown, Massachusetts . ............ ill ZN . T Evanston Insurance Company CO'.NMERCIAL GENER.L LIABILITY DECLARATIONS This policy may contain clai=-made sections — please read the entire forth carefully POLICY ;LUMBER: OOFKGO0008 RENEWAL OF: L-SUREVS NAA'lE & ADDRESS: Barr & Clark 23505 Crenshaw Blvd. Torrance, CA 90505 POLICY PERIOD: FROGS: 03/09/00 TO: 003/09102 At 12.00 A M. Standard Time at your mailing address sho Am above PRODUCER'S tiAAtE & ADDRESS Environmental Insurance Senices, Inc. 4 770I1 200 Cahaba Park South, Ste. 200 Birmingbam, AL 35242 P4 RETURN FOR THE PAYlIENT OF PRENffUNI, A\-D SLB.IECT TO ALL THE TER-NIS OF THIS POLICY, N E AGREE WITH YOU TO PROVIDE THE D�SURXNCE AS STATED Lam!` THIS POLICY. LIMITS OF INSURANCE Environmental Commercial General Liability GENERAL AGGREGATE LIMIT (Other th n Products-Compie:ed Operations): PRODUCTS -COMPLETED OPERATIONS AGGREGATE LEMIT: PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY LI.MiT: EACH OCCLIPRENCE LIMIT: FIRE DAMAGE LIMIT MEDICAL EXPENSE LIMIT: CONTRACTOR'S POLLUTION LIABILITY EACH POLLUTION CONDITION LIMIT: PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY EACH CLAIM LIMIT: SITE SPECIFIC THRID PARTY POLLUTION LIABILITY EACH CLAIM LIMIT: ADVANCE ANT DEPOSIT PREMIUM: MrNINlUM ANNUAL PREMIUM: Retroactive Date for Professional Liability only: 03/09/94 Business Description: Environmental Consultant S 2,000,000. S 1,000,000. S 1,000,000. S 1,000,000. S 50,000..Any One Fire S 5,000. Any One Person S 1,000,000 S 1,000,000 S N/A FORAIS :AND ENDORSE;-,IFNTS ATTACHED TO THIS POLICY: GLOOOI0999 EFIC-06-0100 EEIC-43-0100 IE-0001-0200 IE-0004-0200 IE-0005-0200 IE-0006-0200 IE-0007-0200 IE-00S5-0?00 IE-003-6-0300 IE-0037-0-00 IE-0043-0=00 IL00171185 Coun:ersigrature of applicable) By: d Representative Prepared By: Matt Crochet .State of California Certified Lead Inspector 1 Risk .Assessor BARR & CLARK Independent Environmental Testing ASBESTOS • LEAD • PHASE l LEAD -BASED PAINT INSPECTION REPORT OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 1321 ANY STREET LOS ANGELES, CA PROJECT NO. 201055 APRIL 3, 2001 NOTE. This is a SAMPLE "LEAD -BASED PAINT INSPECTION" REPORT prepared especially for the City of Huntington Beach, Department of Economic Development The comprehensive report was derived from an actual report of typical housing that was in verxyoor condition. Prepared For: Community Development Commission 2 Coral Circle Monterey Park, CA 91755 �4�� N►H: Nk 01,2 #q,kWY12 Reviewed By: Robert Clark State of California Certified Lead Inspector 1 Risk Assessor 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 ro TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 3 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK.........................................................................................................3 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION......................................................................................... 3 4.0 INSPECTOR'S QUALIFICATIONS.............................................................................3 5.0 TESTING PROTOCOL........................................................................................ ..... 4 6.0 METHOD OF TESTNG............................. 7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS........................................................................................... 5 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ 6 9.0 TITLE X REQUIREMENTS.......................................................................................... 7 10.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS...................................................................................... 7 APPENDICES APPENDIX A SUMMARIES LEAD CONTAINING COMPONENTS LIST APPENDIX B XRF FIELD DATA - APPENDIX C HUD FORMS INSPECTOR'S CERTIFICATE(S) EQUIPMENT TRAINING CERTIFICATE(S) INSURANCE CERTIFICATE DHS 8552 APPENDIX D MAP(S) APPENDIX E - LABORATORY MANIFEST AND RESULT(S) Project No. 10I055 Page 2 of 7 SARR $ CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Bird., • Suite 100 • Torrance, California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 s Lead Based Paint Inspection Report Single Family Residence 1321 Any Street LEAD -BASED PAINT INSPECTION REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of Barr & Clark Environmental's lead -based paint (LBP) inspection of the Single Family Residence located at 1321 Any Street, Los Angeles, California (Subject Property), This document is prepared for the sole use of Community Development Commission, and any regulatory agencies that are directly involved in this project. No other party should rely on the information contained herein without prior written consent of Community Development Commission. The scope of services, inspection methodology, and results are presented below. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of this inspection is to identify and assess the Lead -Based Paint (LBP) present on painted components at the subject property. On November 27, 2000, Barr & Clark performed an inspection for lead -based paint at the subject property in Los Angeles, California. To comply with EPA and HUD guidelines, painted and varnished surfaces in every accessible "room equivalent" were sampled for the presence of LBP. The intent was to ascertain the presence of lead -based paint above the federal action level. If LBP was found, the inspection would identify individual architectural components and their respective concentrations of lead in such a manner that this report would be used to characterize the presence of LBP at this property. 3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The subject property is a single family residence that was built circa 1925. It is a one-story building that is constructed over a raised foundation. The exterior walls are covered with wood siding and the windows are a combination of double -hung sash and casement types. The home consists of three bedrooms, one bathroom, and a detached garage. At the time of this inspection, all of the painted surfaces were in vvr poor condition. 4.0 INSPECTOR'S QUALIFICATIONS Matt Crochet of Barr & Clark performed the inspection at the site using an RMD LPA-1 XRF spectrum analyzer instrument. He has attended the radiation safety course for handling the instrument, and completed an EPA approved curriculum in Lead in Construction Inspector / Risk Assessor Training. At the time of this report, the California Department of Health Services, Childhood Lead Poisoning Branch, has implemented a State Certification Model Accreditation Plan adopted from the EPA. Matt Crochet has received certification. Page 3 of 7 201055 BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 s Lead Based Paint Inspection Report Single Family Residence 1321 Any Street Personnel certificate(s) have been provided in Appendix C. 5.0 TESTING PROTOCOL XRF Testing: Testing of the painted surfaces was patterned after the inspection protocol in Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing'. In every "room equivalent" within the tested property, one representative surface of each "testing combination" was tested. Multiple readings were collected to resolve inconsistencies in the test results. Regulatory Compliance: Several public (government) agencies have a published "regulatory action level" to classify LBP. To further complicate matters, some of the established `'levels" are quantified in different units of measurement. Listed below are the current regulatory agencies that have defined LBP, along with the respective action level: Agency HUD IEPA L.A. County OSHA / CAL OSHA Ordinance # 24 CFR 35.86 & 40 CFR 745.103 Title 11, 11.28.010 29 CFR 1926.62 & Title 8, 1532.1 Action level (mg / cm-) 1.0mg/cm' 0.7mg/cm'' Not Specified Action level (ppm" 5,000 ppm 600 ppm"' 600 ppm" HUD / EPA have recently issued the following_ guidance regarding units of measurement for paint samples: "Report lead paint amounts in mg/cm' because this unit of measurement does not depend on the number of layers of non -lead - based paint and can usually be obtained without damaging the painted surface. All measurements of lead in paint should be in mg/cm2, unless the surface area cannot be measured or if all paint cannot be removed from the measured surface area. In such cases, concentrations may be reported in weight percent (%) or parts per million by weight (ppm)."" Furthermore. EPA has Rreviously issued guidance on lead content classification as follows: ... The rule, at 24 CFR 35.86 and 40 CFR 745.103 states that a lead -based paint free finding must demonstrate that the building is free of `paint or other surface coatings that contain lead in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter (1.0 mg i cm) or 0.5 percent by weight (5000 ppm).' The State standards are not applicable, whether more or less strinizent, since a - . _ . _ _. _._ � r_I____ I ______________ "Vi In recognition of the various action levels the testing results are classified as follows for this report: • Painted surfaces with readings at or above 0.7 mg / cm are considered - Positive • Painted surfaces with readings at or below 0.6 mg / cm are considered - Negative The individual readings have been provided on all field data sheets. Any future change in action levels by one of the regulating agencies may affect the classification of results. Dust Wipe SamMinl?: The California DHS/HUD action level for lead dust is 40 µg/ft2 for floors, 250 µg / R2 for window sills, 400 µg / ft2 for window wells, and 400 µg / ft2 for exterior surfaces. Soil Sampline: The California DHS/HUD action level for lead in soil is 400 parts per million (ppm) for bare soil and 1000 ppm for soil covered with vegetation (ground cover, grass, etc.). Page 4 of 7 201 oss BARR & CLARK 9 2 8850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance. California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 Lead Based Paint Inspection Report Single Family Residence 1321 Any Street 6.0 METHOD OF TESTING Paint Testing: The method employed was X-ray fluorescence (XRF) using a Radiation Monitoring Device Lead Paint Analyzer (RMD LPA-1). The instrument was operated in "Quick Mode." where the duration for each test result is determined by a combination of • the actual reading relative to the designated action level; • the age of the radioactive source; and • the substrate on which the test was taken. The instrument's calibration was verified according to the manufacturer's specifications in compliance with the Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) developed for this instrument. The readings from this instrument produce a 95% confidence level that the "lead" reading accurately reflects the actual level of lead in the tested surfaces, relative to the federal action Ievel. All information regarding the specific instrument used may be found in Appendix C. Laboratory Sam le Analysis: Soil and dust samples were collected from this property and analyzed for lead content by the Long Beach Health Department — Laboratory Division which is accredited by the American Industrial Association (AIHA), the National Institute for Standards and Technology (AIVLAP) and the California Department of Health Services (ELAP). The samples were analyzed as follows: • Dust Wipe Spmpling - The method of analysis was Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (OSHA ID- 121, Flame AA) performed on samples collected from measured areas. • Soil Sampling - The method of analysis was Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (SW-486, flame AA) performed on samples collected from the top '/z" of bare soil areas (drip line, etc.). 7.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS Paint Sampling: Throughout the subject property, several of the painted components indicated the presence of lead -based paint (LBP) at or above the federal action level. The following summary lists the specific components that tested above the action level and their respective locations: Interior • Living Room — door components, window components, crown moldings, and baseboards • Kitchen — all painted components • Laundry Room - door components, window components, and baseboards • Bedroom 1 — door components and window components • Bedroom 2 — door components, window components, closet components, and baseboards • Bathroom — all painted components (except cabinet) • Bedroom 3 - door components, window components, closet components, and baseboards Page 5 of 7 201055 BARR & CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 9 (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 317-0822 Lead Based Paint Inspection Report Single Family Residence 1321 Any Street • Some of the tiles in the kitchen also tested positive for lead. These surfaces were not painted and the lead is most likely in the glazing or the matrix of the tile itself. Exterior • All painted wooden components Sampling for this inspection was representative and any components that were not tested but similar to those components that tested positive for LBP should be considered and treated as lead laden. The field data and results for paint sampling may be found in Appendices A - B. Dust and Soil Sampling: All of the tested items indicated a level of lead above the specified regulatory limit. Both of the dust wipes samples indicated elevated levels of lead, but the sample adjacent to the front door was significantly above the action level. The soil sample from the perimeter of the house was exceptionally high in lead content. A copy of the laboratory manifest and results may be found in Appendix E. 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ,The greatest potential for lead exposure from lead painted architectural components occurs when: the paint has become defective; or when the paint is applied to a friction / impact component where the paint is continually disturbed; or when the paint is disturbed through routine maintenance or renovation activities. With this in mind, the following are our recommendations for this property: • The results from this inspection should be provided to any individuals that may disturb the painted surfaces. It is encouraged to utilize professionals that have experience working with LBP^ • Further testing of the soil should be completed prior to any abatement or renovation. It is important to determine the surface area and the depth of the soil contamination and integrate these findings with any abatement strategy. • If renovation is scheduled in the near future (less than three months), all lead painted components that have been previously targeted for replacement should be replaced utilizing `'lead safe" containment and work practices. • ALL components that have been identified with defective lead paint should have the paint repaired as soon as possible. Any paint repair should be done utilizing "lead safe" containment, work practices, and clean-up techniques. • All components with lead painted friction / impact surfaces should be treated to minimize the friction or impact as necessary. Page 6 of 7 201055 BARR S CLARK • 22850 Crenshaw Blvd., • Suite 200 • Torrance, California 90505 9 (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 Lead Based Paint Inspection Report Single Family Residence 1321 Any Street • Lead painted components that have not been targeted for replacement should either be considered for abatement (replacement, enclosure, encapsulation, etc.) or included in an Operations & Management (O & M) Plan that will help to minimize exposures to lead hazards. • All lead painted surfaces that are not expected to be impacted in the near future (less than three months) should also be included the O & M plan. • In addition, the tenants or occupants of the dwelling should be notified of the test results and instructed in actions that they may perform to keep the living areas "lead safe." • The tile surfaces are not a likely source of lead dust contamination as long as they remain intact. If future renovation or repair activities require that the tile be removed, or the surfaces disturbed, it should be done in a manner that does not break the tiles. If this is not feasible, this task should be assigned to a lead certified contractor. 9.0 TITLE X REQUIREMENTS A copy (or summary) of this report must be provided to new lessees (tenants) and purchasers of this property under Federal law (24 CFR part 35 and 40 CFR part 745) before they become obligated under a lease or sales contract. The complete report must also be provided to new purchasers and it must be made available to new tenants. Landlords (lessors) and sellers are also required to distribute an educational pamphlet approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and include standard warning language in their leases or sales contracts to ensure that parents have the information they need to protect their children from lead -based paint hazards. This report should be maintained and updated as a permanent maintenance record for this property. 10.0 INSPECTION LIMITATIONS This inspection was planned, developed, and implemented based on Barr & Clark's previous experience in performing lead -based paint inspections. This inspection was patterned after Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing (1997 Revision). Barr & Clark utilized state -of -the -art -practices and techniques in accordance with regulatory standards while performing this inspection. Barr & Clark's evaluation of the relative risk of exposure to lead identified during this inspection is based on conditions observed at the time of the inspection. Barr & Clark cannot be responsible for changing conditions that may alter the relative exposure risk or for future changes in accepted methodology. Enclosed are the diagram(s), actual test results, and all relevant certifications and licenses. 1997 Revision ii Parts per million iii Applies to sale and application of LHP. iv Applies to construction related activities v Chapter 7 of the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing (1997 Revision). vi Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, (August 20, 1996) Page 7 of 7 201055 BARR & CLARK 9 22850 Crenshaw Bled., • Suite 200 9 Torrance, California 90505 • (310) 517-0805 • Fax: (310) 517-0822 SUMMARY OF INTERIOR Project Name: Single. Family Residence Project Number: 201055 Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Component Number Number Percent Positive Number Percent Tested Positive Negative Negative Plaster Ceiling 4 1 25.00% 3 75.00% Plaster Wall 20 4 20.00% 16 80.00% Plaster Window Frame 1 1 100.00% Plaster Window Sash 1 1 100.00% Plaster Window Sill 1 1 100.00% Tile Counter Top 1 1 100.00% Wood Baseboard 6 6 100.00% Wood Cabinet Door 2 2 100. 5%°!0 Wood Cabinet Frame 2 1 50.00% 1 50.00% Wood Cabinet Shelf 2 1 50.00% 1 50.00% Wood Ceiling 2 1 50.00% 1 50.00% Wood Closet Door 3 2 66.67% 1 33.33% . Wood Closet Door Frame 3 2 66.67% 1 33.33% Wood Crown Molding 1 1 100.00% Wood Door 10 10 100.00% Wood Door Frame 10 9 90.00% 1 10.00°0 Wood Floor 4 4 100.00% Wood Wall 8 4 50.00% 4 50.00% Wood Window Frame 6 6 100.00% Wood Window Sash 6 6 100.00% Wood Window Sill 6 66 100.00% Totals: 99 64 35 Testing done in compliance with current L.A. County DHS guidelines for XRF. Barr & Clark Environmental (310) 517-0805 1 3/8/2001 9:37:02AM SUMMARY OF EXTERIOR Project Name: Single Family Residence Project Humber: 201055 Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Component Number Number Percent Positive Number Percent Tested Positive Negative Negative Concrete Deck 2 2 100,00% Concrete Tread 1 1 150.00% Wood Access Panel 2 2 100.00% Wood Ceiling 1 1 100.00% Wood Column 1 1 100.00% Wood Door 2 2 100.00% Wood Door Frame 2 2 100.00% Wood Garage Door 1 1 100.00% Wood Garage Door Frame 1 1 100.00% Wood Railing 1 1 100.00% Wood Roof Trim 6 6 100.00% Wood Threshhold 1 1 100.00% Wood Wall 8 8 100.00% Wood Window Frame 5 5 100.00% Wood Window Sash 5 5 100.00% Wood Window Well 5 5 100.00% Totals: 44 38 6 Testing done in compliance with current L.A. County DHS guidelines for XRF. Barr & Clark Environmental (310) 5174805 2 3/8/2001 9:37:02M.-i CONTAINING CO..VIPONENTS LIST .Interior Lead Containing Components List Project Name: Single Family Residence Project ID: 201055 Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 88 Plaster Ceiling Bathroom 1.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED 83 A Plaster Wall Bathroom 1.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED 84 B Plaster Wall Bathroom 1.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED 85 C Plaster Wall Bathroom 1.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED 86 D Plaster Wall Bathroom - --- ----- -- 1.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED 38 B Plaster Window Frame Laundry Room 6.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED 37 B Plaster Window Sash Laundry Room T 6.3 POSITIVE DAMAGED 36 6 Plaster Window Sill Laundry Room 3.5 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement 25 B Tile Counter Top Kitchen 2.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED 87 D Wood Baseboard Bathroom 2.7 POSITIVE DAMAGED 70 C Wood Baseboard Bedroom 2 5.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED 102 C Wood Baseboard Bedroom 3 2.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED 30 C Wood Baseboard Kitchen 2.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED 43 A Wood Baseboard Laundry Room 1.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED 13 B Wood Baseboard Living Room 1.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED 22 B Wood Cabinet Frame Kitchen 4,6 POSITIVE DAMAGED 24 a B Wood Cabinet Shelf Kitchen 1.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED 31 Wood Ceiling Kitchen 2.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED 64 A Wood Closet Door Bedroom 2 6.9 POSITIVE Intact 96 C - -------- -- Wood Closet Door Bedroom 3 3.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED 65 A Wood Close( Door Frame Bedroom 2 3.7 POSITIVE Intact L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mg/cm2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling Y/ith levels at or above 0.7 nig/cm2. Barr.& Clark En vironm en tat (310) 517-0805 1 of 6 318/2001 9:37:07AM . interior Lead Containing Components List Project Name: Single Family Residence Project 10: 201055 Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 97 C Wood Closet Door Frame Bedroom 3 2.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED 16 ^ B Wood Crown Molding Living Room � 1.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED 89 A Wood Door Bathroom 1.7 — POSITIVE DAMAGED 75 _ C-Wood Door Bathroom 6.3 POSITIVE DAMAGED -- 46 ---B-------Wood Door-----.----T-- Bedroom 1 -�— � 1.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED -� 73 B Wood Door --•...-....... -- ............ ------ Bedroom 2 ..- ..... 5.6 POSITIVE ---- DAMAGED 59 C Wood Door Bedroom 2 1.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED 91 B Wood Door Bedroom 3 1.6 POSITIVE Intact 17 A Wood Door Kitchen 12.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED 44 - A _ Wood Door -� -� - T�- Laundry Room _ 4.6 POSITIVE DAMAGED 34 C Wood Door Laundry Room 3.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED r 4 -A Wood Door w Living Room 6.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED -- � 90 �.-- Ar--- Wood Door Frame-r------ f3alllroom---..`- ~-� --�- 2.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED � - • 76 C - Wood Door Frame _ Bathroom ---~ - - ~- 6.1 ~ - POSITIVE- DAMAGED 74 B Wood Door Frame Bedroom 2 5.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED 60 C Wood Door Frame Bedroom 2 6.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED 92 B ---- - ••-.__._.......__.. _.._.._.. ..__ Wood Door Frame ....__... _..... _.... ............_.... Bedroom 3 -------------- - - - ... 2.1 - - - POSITIVE . ...... ._.._.. _ - - --- ----- -- -- — -- Intact _ 18 - A — Wood Door Frame — Kitchen + -- —� 7.5 POSITIVE DAMAGED 45 A +—C�Wood ~Wood Door Frame -~--- Laundry Room — 3.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED 35 Door Frame Laundry Room 2.4 POSITIVE DAMAGED 5 A Wood Door Frame Living Roorn 6.4 POSITIVE DAMAGED L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mglcrn2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above 0.7 m11cm2. Barr & Clark Envirorrnientaf (310) 517-0505 2 of 6 302001 9;37;07AM . interior Lead Containing Components List Project Name: Single Family Residence Project ID: 201055 Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 26 A Wood Wall Kitchen 2.6 POSITIVE DAMAGED 27 B Wood Wall Kitchen - 4.3 POSITIVE DAMAGED 28 C Wood Wall -- Kitchen 4.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED - 29 D Wood Wall -- Kitchen 3.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED 79 D� Wood Window Frame Bathroom T - 2.7 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement - - -- 50 -- - C - -- - ----- �__ .. --- Wood Window Frame •— __—........ — ........ -- - --- -... Bedroom 1 --- - ._� .- 1.2 -- --- POSITIVE - DAMAGED Double Hung 63 _ D Wood Window Frame Bedroom 2 2.7 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung 95 D Wood Window Frame Bedroom 3 2.3 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung 21 B Wood Window Frame Kitchen 4.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double I -lung 8 --- ---_B Wood Window Frame ---� Living Room ---------- --- . -6.9 � POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement---_--- 78 D Wood Window Sash Bathroom - 6.3 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement — 49 C Wood Window Sash Bedroom 1 1.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung �- 62 D _-D Wood Window Sash J- Bedroom 2 _ - - 4� 3.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung 94 - Wood Window Sash Bedroom 3 3.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung 20 B Wood Window Sash _ Kitchen 2.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung 7 B Wood Window Sash .... .-........ --- - - - -- --- Livinr3Room -- --- ---- - - _..�- 7.2 ---- ---�_ POSITIVE — _. _�.r DAMAGED Casement 77 D Wood Window Sill Bathroom 9.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement 48 C Wood Window Sill Bedroom 1 W— 1.3 POSITIVE � DAMAGED Double Hung 61 ^^ D Wood Window Sill - Bedroom 2 _ 1.6 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung 93 D Wood Window Sill Bedroom 3 1.6 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung T 19 B Wood Window Sill- Kitchen - T- 2.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED Double Hung L.A. County DFIS action level for lead paint is 0.7 niglciz)2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling wish levels at or above 0.7 rncglcm2. Darr & Clark Envrrnnn;enfal (310) 517-O805 3 of 6 1!8/.2001 9:37:07AI-A .Interior Lead Containing Components List Project Name: Single Family Residence Project ID: 201055 Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles. CA Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 6 8 Wood Window Sill Living Room 3.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mg/cni2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mg/cm2. Barr & Clark Envirminienfal (310) 517-0805 1 of 6 3/8/2001 9:37:07AfA Exterior Lead Containing Components List Project Name: Single Family Residence Project ID: 201055 Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 110 Wood Ceiling Perimeter South Side 4.5 POSITIVE DAMAGED 111 A Wood Column Perimeter South Side 14.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED 32 - - Wood Door Laundry Room - 2.6 POSITIVE DAMAGED 1 Wood Door T -�^ Living Room- 6.7 POSITIVE DAMAGED 33 Wood Door Frame Laundry Room 3.1 J POSITIVE DAMAGED 2 Wood Door Frame Living Room ------ ------- 9.2 -- - --_ POSITIVE -... -- - -- - - --- DAMAGED - 142 A- Wood Garage Door Garage Perimeter - - 1.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED 143 A Wood Garage Door Frame Garage Perimeter 1.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED 112 A Wood Railing Perimeter South Side 1.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED 141 _ A Wood Roof Trim-~-�- - Garage Perimeter - 2.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED ~J 140 B Wood Roof Trim -- ~Garage Perimeter -- 2.3 — POSITIVE DAMAGED 134 D WoodRoofTrim - Perimeter East Side - 1.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED _ 125 -- C- Wood Roof Trim ---- Perimeter North Side _ -- --- 2.7 POSITIVE DAMAGED ~-~- r 109 A Wood Roof Trim - Perimeter South Side T - w- 2.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED 119 - B Wood Roof Trim Perimeter West Side -- -4 1.7 POSITIVE DAMAGED - - --- -- 136 - ._..._- A - - - - --- - - -- - --- -- -- Wood Wall - - - --- - --- - - - - -- - --...- .......... Garage Perimeter -- - ---- - - 1.7 --- - - ---- - POSITIVE - __- _ -_---- _..-_.—__ DAMAGED 137 B - Wood Wall - -- Garage Perimeter 6.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED 138 ~ C Wood Wall - +- Garage Perimeter 3.1 POSITIVE- DAMAGED 139 D Wood Wall Garage Perimeter 2.3 - POSITIVE DAMAGED 133 D Wood Wall - Perimeter East Side 3.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED - 124 C Wood Wall Perimeter North Side 4.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mg/cm2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mglcm2. Barr & Clerk Envir-onnientat(310) 517-0305 5 of 0 3/8/2001 9:37:07AM . Exterior Lead Containing Components List Project Name: Single Family Residence Project 1D: 201055 Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Sample Side Testing Combination Room Equivalent Lead Results Condition Comments 10$ A Wood Wall Perimeter South Side 9.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED 11$ B Wood Wall �- Perimeter West Side 4.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED 129 D Wood Window Frame Perimeter East Side 1.3 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement 132 D Wood Window Frame Perimeter East Side T 2.7 —2.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement 123 C Wood Window Frame T Perimeter North Side POSITIVE DAMAGED 107 A Wood Window Frame Perimeter South Side 6.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement 117 B Wood Window Frame Perimeter West Side ^- 2.7 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement 131 D J Wood Window Sash T Perimeter East Side 6.1 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement 12a D Wood Window Sas Perimeter East Side 1.9 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement 122 C Wood Window Sash �- Perimeter North Side -~~- 1.7 — POSITIVE DAMAGED 106 A Wood Window Sash Perimeter South Side -~ 6.3 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement 11G —B Wood Window Sash Perimeter West Side 3.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement - 12- D Wood Window Well- Perimeter East Side 4 2.6 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement 130 D Wood Window Well - Perimeter East Side - 2.3 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement -� 121 C Wood Window Well Perimeter North Side -- - 3.2 POSITIVE DAMAGED - 10S A Wood Window Well Perimeter South Side 11.0 POSITIVE DAMAGED Casement --- ... - M ..--....-..__.. B - ... ..-._.-...-... - - - - - Wood Window Well - - ... - _. _.............. - ...-...... Perimeter West Side - ..--...-....._ _ ...... - 1.6 --.... -. .._.--..-- - POSITIVE - - _ - ------ ...- -- - DAMAGED Casement L.A. County DI -IS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mg/cm2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mglcm2. Barr & Clark Envrr•onrnenfal (310) 517-0505 6 of 6 3/8/2001 9.37:07AIA Project Name: Single Family Residence Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Sample Unit 10 1 Location 1 2 _ 3 4 6 �..- 7 -- - - --- B----- --------- - iD 11 12 13 ---� 14 15 -.~ 16 17 ---- - 19 ---_.- _ 20 30 31 32 33 FIELD DATA REPORT Room Equivalent Side Component Exterior Living Room Door Door Frame Threshhold Inlerior Living Room A Door A Door Frame B Window Sill - -- T-T- B Window Sash - B Window Frame A Wall B Wall ~ C Wall - l3 Wall ---- B Baseboard -•---- ---__ ...-_-. Ceiling Floor------- ~- B Crown Molding Interidr Kitchen A Docr - --- - _ -- -- - - A -13 - B Door Frame Winslow Sili Window Sash - -Window B Frame B Cabinet frame B B Cabinet Door Cabinet Shelf B Counter Top T A Wall -• -- _ B Wall '------- -� C Wall - -- -D Wall _ Exterior Laundry Room C_ Baseboard Ceiling _Door Door Frame 34 Interior Laundry Rocm C Door L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mglcm2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mglcm2. Project Number, 201055 Protocol: LA County substrate Y Condition Lead Results Comments Wood DAMAGED 6.7 POSITIVE Wood DAMAGED 9.2 POSITIVE Wood DAMAGED 0.3 Negative Wood_ DAMAGED 6.9 POSITIVE_ Wood DAMAGED 6.4 POSITIVE -~ DAMAGED 3.9 POSITIVE _ Casement _Wood Wood DAMAGED 7.2 POSITIVE Casement Wood DAMAGED -6.9 POSITIVE Casement Wood _ DAMAGED 0.3 Negalive T Wood DAMAGED 0.0 Negative Wood DAMAGED 0.3 Negalive Wood DAMAGED 0.3 Negative Wood DAMAGED 1.1 POSITIVE Wood Wood WoodDAMAGED DAMAGED DAMAGED - 0.1 o.2 1.0 Negative Negative POSITIVE T Wood Wood Wood Wood Wood- DAMAGED - DAMAGED DAMAGED DAMAGED DAMAGED_ 12.0 7.5 2.1 -2.9 4.0 POSITIVE POSITIVE POSITIVE - POSITIVE POSITIVE _ �- Double Hung Double Hung Double Hung Wood - DAR4AGED 4.6 POSITIVE --~- Wood _ Wood -� Tile Wood DAMAGED DAMAGED DAMAGED - DAMAGED 03 i.D 2.9 �2.6 Negative - POSITIVE POSITIVE - POSITIVE- _ _ Wood - DAMAGED - 4.3 - POSITIVE �- Wood- DAMAGED 4.0 POSITIVE Wood DAMAGED 3.9 POSITIVE - Wood DAMAGED 2.1 POSITIVE Wood - - -~ - DAMAGED - 2.9 POSITIVE-~ Wood -wood DAMAGED 2.6 POSITIVE -- -- Wood - DAMAGED DAMAGED 3.1 3.9 -T POSITIVE --POSITIVE - - , r. n n r 1 r,1 5 3,P,r2001 9:37:13At,1 FIELD DATA REPORT Project Name: Single Family Residence Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Project Number: 201055 Protocol: LA County Sample Unit ID r Location Roam Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 35 Interior Laundry Room C Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 2.4 POSITIVE 36 -� - -� - 8 Window Sill - Plaster __--DAMAGED 3.5 POSITIVE Casement 8 Window Sash Plaster DAMAGED 6.3- POSITIVE _37 38 - ---� _ B _ Window Frame - -Plaster DAMAGED 6.1 POSITIVE 39 A Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 40 B W311 Plaster DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 41 C Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 42 D Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 43 A Baseboard Wood DAMAGED 1.2 POSITIVE 44 A Door Wood DAMAGED 4.6 POSITIVE 45 A Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 3.9 POSITIVE 46 ._..._.... _.._- Interior Bedroom 1 B Door Wood DAMAGED 1.9 POSITIVE 47 B Door Frame Wood DAMAGED -0.1 Negative 48 C Window Sill Wood DAMAGED 1.3 POSITIVE Double Hung 49 C Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 1.2 POSITIVE Double Hung 50 C Window frame Wood DAMAGED 1.2 POSITIVE Double Hung 51 B Closet Door Wood DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 52 B Closet Door Frame Wood DAMAGED -0.2 Negative 53 A Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.3 Negative 54 B Wall Plater DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 55 C Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 56 D Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 57 Ceiling Plaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 58 Floor Wood DAMAGED -0.1 Negative 59 Interior Bedroom 2 C Door Wood DAMAGED 1.2 POSITIVE 60 C Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 6.1 POSITIVE 61 D Window Sill Wood DAMAGED 1.6 POSITIVE Double Hung 62 D Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 3.9 POSITIVE Double Flung 63 D Window Frame Wood DAMAGED 2.7 POSITIVE Double Hung 64 A Closet Door Wood Intact 6.9 POSITIVE 65 A Closet Door Frame Wood Intact 3.7 POSITIVE 66 A Wall Plaster DAMI,AGED 0.3 Negative 67 B Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 63 C Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negative L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mg1cm2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mglcm2. Rnrr X r/ark F-rvvirnrioiPrrlrfl o1n) 517-OA05 2 of 5 101i.MO 1 9:37: l."A 1 FIELD DATA REPORT Project Name: Single Family Residence Project Number. 201055 Address: 1321 Any Street Protocol: LA County Los Angeles, CA Sample Unit ID I Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Conditlon Lead Results Comments 69 Interior Bedroom 2 D Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 70 C Baseboard Wood DAMAGED 5.9 POSITIVE 71 Ceiling Plaster DAMAGED -0.1 Negative 72 Floor Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 73 B Door Wood DAMAGED 5.6 POSITIVE 74 B Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 5.2 POSITIVE 75 ---- - - - ---------- Interior Bathroom C Door . Wood ...... DAMAGED 6.3 POSITIVE ........... . 76 C Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 6.1 POSITIVE 77 D Window Sill Wood DAMAGED 9.1 POSITIVE Casement 78 D Window Sash Wood DAF14AGED r.3 POSITIVE Casement 79 D Window Frame Wood DAMAGED 2.7 POSITIVE Casement 80 D Cabinet Frame Wood DAMAGED 0.1 Negative 81 D Cabinet Door Wood DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 82 D Cabinet Shelf Wood DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 83 A Wall Plaster DAMAGED 1.0 POSITIVE 84 13 Wall P)052cr DAMAGED I'l POSITIVE 85 C Wall Plaster DAMAGED 1.2 POSITIVE 66 D Wall Plaster DAMAGED 1.1 POSITIVE 87 D Baseboard Wood DAMAGED 2.7 POSITIVE 88 . ................. .. . .......... ..... Ceiling . Plaster DAMAGED 1.2 POSITIVE 89 A Door Wood DAMAGED 1.7 POSITIVE 90 - ---------- ---------- A --------- Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 2.9 POSITIVE 91 Interior Bedroom 3 B Door - ----------- - Wood Intact 1.6 POSITIVE 92 -------- ---- B . .. . ............. Door Frame Wood Inlact 2,1 POSITIVE 03 D Windoiv Sill Wood DAMAGED 1.6 POSITIVE Double Hung 94 D Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 3.1 POSITIVE Double Hung 95 D Window Frame Wood DAMAGED 2.3 POSITIVE Double Hung 96 C Closet Door Wood ........... DAMAGED 3.9 POSITIVE 97 C Closet Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 2.1 POSITIVE 98 A Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.3 Negative 99 6 Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 100 C Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 101 D Wall Plaster DAMAGED 0.3 Negative 102 C Baseboard Wood DAMIAGED 2.1 POSITIVE L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mg/cm2. Positive is defined as XF%F sampling vith levels at or above 0.7 m91'crn2- n-.,... P ri-f- (q-ini r.97_nRn!-) 'i of 5 3/8/2001 9:37:13AM FIELD DATA REPORT Project Name: Single Family Residence Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Project Number: 201055 Protocol: LA County Sample Unit ID I Location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 103 Interior Bedroom 3 Ceiling Plaster DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 104 Floor Wood DAMAGED 0.0 Negative 105 Perimeter Exterior South Side A Window Well Wood DAMAGED 11.0 POSITIVE Casement 106 A Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 6.3 POSITIVE Casement 107 A Window Frame Wood DAMAGED 6.9 POSITIVE Casement 106 A Wall Wood DAMAGED 9.2 POSITIVE 109 A Roof Trim Wood DAMAGED 2.9 POSITIVE 110 Ceiling Wood DAMAGED 4.5 POSITIVE 111 A Column - - Wood --------- DAMAGED 14.0 POSITIVE 112 A Railing Wood DAMAGED 1.0 POSITIVE 113 A Deck Concrete DAMAGED 0.2 Negative - --------- 114 A Tread Concrete DAMAGED 0.3 Negative 115 Exterior West Side 0 Window Well Wood DAMAGED 1.6 POSITIVE Casement 176 B Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 3.2 POSITIVE Casement 117 B Window Frame Wood DAMAGED 2.7 POSITIVE Casement 118 B Wall Wood DAMAGED 4.2 POSITIVE 119 B Roof Trim Wood DAMAGED 1.7 POSITIVE 120 B Access Panel Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 121 Exterior North Side C Window Well Wood DAMAGED 3.2 POSITIVE 122 ......... . C window Sash Wood DAMAGED 1.7 POSITIVE 123 C Window Frame Wood DAMAGED 2.9 POSITIVE 124 C Wall Wood DAMAGED 4.9 POSITIVE 125 C Roof Trim Wood DAMAGED 2.7 POSITIVE 126 C Deck Concrete DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 127 Exterior East Side D Window Well Wood DAMAGED 2.6 POSITIVE Casement 128 D Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 1.9 POSITIVE Casement 129 D Window Frame Wood DAMAGED 1.3 POSITIVE Casement 130 D Window Well - ----- ---------- Wood DAMAGED 2.3 POSITIVE Casement 131 D Window Sash Wood DAMAGED 6.1 POSITIVE Casement POSITIVE Casement 133 D Wall Wood DAMAGED 3.9 POSITIVE 134 D Roof Trim Wood DAMAGED 1.2 POSITIVE 135 D Access Panel Wood DAMAGED 0.2 Negative 136 Garage Exterior Perimeter . .. ......... ...... A Wall Wood DAMAGED 1.7 POSITIVE L.A. County DHS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mq/cm2. Positive is defined as XRF sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mg/cm2. A I r q:'17:13AM FIELD DATA REPORT Project Name: Single Family Residence Address: 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Project Number: 201055 Protocol: LA County Sample Unit ID I location Room Equivalent Side Component Substrate Condition Lead Results Comments 137 Garage Exterior Perimeter B Wall Wood DAMAGED 6.1 POSITIVE 13$ —�+ -- C Waal — ~ Wood DAMAGED 3.1 POSITIVE J+ 139 D Wall �— Wood DAMAGED 2.3 POSITIVE 140 B Roof Trim Wood DAMAGED 2.3 POSITIVE ----•--- 141 ---•------ •— A�- Roof Trim - - - Wood -�.• DAMAGED 2.9 POSITIVE --�� 142 A Garage Door Wood DAMAGED 1.0 POSITIVE 143 A Garage Door Frame Wood DAMAGED 1.1 POSITIVE L.A. County DMS action level for lead paint is 0.7 mg/cm2. Positive is defines! as XRF sampling with levels at or above 0.7 mglcm2. 111M r,,17_0nn , '5 of 5 3/8/2001 9:37:13Ahl Chapter S: Risk Assessment 40�11 Form 5.0 Resident Questionnaire (To by completed by risk assessor via ir,tenfiew with resident.) Children/Children's Habits 1- (a) Do you have any children that live in your home? Yes No (If no children, skip to Question 5.) (b) If yes, how many? Ages? (c) Record blood lead levels, if kno vn. (d) Are there women of child-bearing age present? Yes No 2. Location of the rooms/areas %.here each child sleeps, eats, and plays. Name of child Location of bedroom Location of a!I rooms %.'here child eats Primary location %:here child plays indoors Primary location v:here child plays outdoors lI� f � k� 3. Where are toys stcredi,fa t? 4. Is :here any visible evaderice of cheV.'cd Cr peeiii g paint on a-.e %voodl':c;k, furniture, or'.Qys? Yes No Family Use Patterns 5. Which entrances are used most frecuen;ly? 6.. Which windows are opened most frequently? =-!- 7. Do you use window air conditioners? If yes, where? A/ (Condensation often causes paint deferiort;cn) B. (a) Do any household members Carden? Yes No .� (b) Location of garden. (c) Are you planning any landscaping activities teat ,':ill remove grass or ground cever.rg? - Yes No 9. (a) 1-:ow often is the household cleaned? /),4f _i/r.t� t (b) What cleaning melhods do you use? 10. (a) Did you recently ccrr,ple,e any building rercraticns? Yes No (b) If yes, where? (c) Was building debris s`c:ed in the yaid? if yes, 11. Are you plannng any bui:d;:ig renc:'at:crs? It y-es, .:here? 12. (a) Co any household rr.Lrbers %%,crk in a !ea d-related incuStry? Yes No (b) If yes, where are did,y k.,ork clothes placed and cleaned? 5-43 ono Chapter S: Risk Assessment o¢o Form S. i Building Condition Form Condition Yes Ho Roof missing parts of surfaces (tiles, boards, shakes, etc.) Roof has holes or large cracks Gutters or downspouts broken Chimney masonry cracked, bricks loose or missing, obviously out of plumb Exterior or interior walls have obvious large cracks or hola-s, requiring more than routine pointing (if masonry) or painting Exterior siding has missing boards or shino;es jC Water stains on interior walls or ceilings Plaster walls or ceilings deteriorated i o or more windows or doors brc en, missing, or boarded Porch or steps have major elements broken, missin,a, or boarded up Foundation has major cracks, missing rnatericl, structure Ieans, or visibly unsound ` Total number lithe "Yes' column has two or more checrs, tl?a dvr el:ira is usuaily co, steered to be in poor concision fart^a p--,rposEs of a risk assessment. However, specific condiitons and cXten 2ii iC ci:curnsiances should be consiC?red before determining the'irlal condition of the dwelling and the appropriateness of a fee hazard screen. NOFcS: - r�t 4 1-- #Vt b 14�Lz�, 7 C) /") /��' 11 Vt�71Z-y `o%o , c n ;tJa / 77707L) , S— 4 oho Chapter 5: Risk Assessment V Forst} 5.2 Paint Conditions on Selected Surfaces (Single -Family, Ovrner-Occuoied) Building component Location dotes Paint condition (intact, fair, poor, or not present) to be completed by risk assessor Deterioration due to friction or impact? Deterioration due to moisture? Location of painted component with visible bite marks Building siding Exterior trim Exterior windotivs exterior doors Railings I I Porch floors I I I ) I Other porch surfaces Interior doors Ceilings I f I I 1 Walls Interior ►vindo% s Interior floors I I Interior trim Stairways I Radiator (or radiator cover) Kitchen cabinets � { -Bathroom cabinets I I 1 I } Other surfaces: \i I i✓ f f I I If the overall cerGition of a component is similar throughout a dwelling, that condition should be recorded. If a component in a couple of locations is in poor condition, but the overall condition is good or fair, the spec:'.ic sites of the badly deteriorated paint should be noted. The specific locations of any component wish bdz marks should be recorded. 5—,, 5 STATE OF CALIFOMIA—H ALTH AND WMA\ SMICES AC>;ticY GRAY D.ANIS. Gorernor DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 'HILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION BRANCH AS CLAY STREET, SUITE 1801 '• OAK AND, CA 94612 (5I0)622-5000 August 22, 2000 Mr. Matthew P. Crochet Barr & Clark 22850 Crenshaw Boulevard, # 200 Torrance, California 90505 Dear Mr. Crochet: Your California Department of Health Services (DHS) Lead Certificate(s) has been renewed. Please note that your expiration date(s)canged. From this point forward it will be your date of birth. In addition. since we received your renewal application after the original expiration date, your new expiration will reflect less than one Year because we cannot provide additional time to those who submit late application. Type of Certificate Certificate ID Y Expiration Date Inspector/Assessor I-12 06/13/2001 Project Monitor M-12 06/13/2001 The enclosed certificate card/sticker serves as your proof of full certification renewal by the Department. (If you received a sticker, please place it on the front left side of your certificate 1D card, over your name and the old certificate information. Do not cover your photo with the sticker.) Please note that alteration of any information or fraudulent use of your card/sticker my result in revocation of your certificate. If your card is lost, stolen or inaccurate please notify DHS immediately. Do not cut up or destroy your card when your certificate expires. To ensure that your certificate is renewed before it expires, please submit your next renewal application to the Department at least 120 days before the expiration date(s) above. Call the Lead Related Construction Information Line at 1-800-597-5323 for renewal forms and instructions. (From outside_ California, call (510) 622-5072.) If you change your home or mailing address, please notify the Department within 30 days by calling 1-800-597-5323 or by writing to us at 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1801, Box C, in Oakland, California, 94612. If you fail to notify us of changes in your address, we will be unable to send your certification materials in the future. Thank you for your cooperation and continued efforts in helping to prevent childhood lead poisoning. �- "---" — 9LhdcsftFin Sincerely, DmparYnM d HWh S� Lead -Related Construction Certificate Matthew P. Crochet. Inspector/Assessor.- f-12 (Exp. 06/13l01)' Project Monitor- - - M-12 (Exp. 06/13101) . ��� Larrie L. Lance, Dr.P.H., R.E.A., Chief Lead Hazard Reduction Section Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY EXTENSION, DAVIS Western Regional Lead Training Center IN RECOGNITION THAT Matt Crochet HAS ATTENDED THE FOLLOWING PROGRAM EPA -Sponsored Lead Inspectors Training March 14 - 162 1994 Passed final exam Certificate Number 1078 I • you °Avis Lead Abatement rogram Manager 1 Kr ]1}' °'� yti�Ii lt�{yti, Y ;�•r,t' L,YA- 1 Leaci raint inspection --)yYstem ed to, the topics of* Radiation Saflety and the Proper Use of the'llistniment. AD 7:4 �Ilusctts N NA". Evanston Insurance Company CO'.NE►fERCLkL GENERAL LIABILITY DECLARATIONS This policy may contain claims -made sections — please read the entire form carefully POLICY INUAfBER: 00PKG00008 RENEWAL OF: INSLTR.ED'S NAME & ADDRESS: Barr & Clark 23505 Crenshaw Blvd. Torrance, CA 90505 POLICY PERIOD: FIRO)x: 03/09/00 TO: 003/09/02 At 12:00 A.M. Standard Time at your mailing address shown above PRODUCER'S NAME & ADDRESS Environmental Insurance Senzces, Inc. R 7 011 200 Cahaba Park South, Ste. 200 Birmingham, AL 35242 IN RETURN FOR THE PAYMENT OF PRE\ITL:lf, AXD SUBJECT TO ALL THE TER-NIS OF THIS POLICY, NVE AGREE NN ITH YOU TO PROVIDE THE rSURANCE AS STATED IN THIS POLICY. LI MITS OF INSUR-AI CE Environmental Commercial General Liabiliry GENERAL AGGREGATE LIMIT (Other tha-i Produc:s-Completed Operations): ?RODLCTS-COMPLETED OPERATIONS AGGREGATE LIMIT: PERSO�'AL & ADVERTISING INJURY LIMIT: EACH OCCURRENCE LIMIT: FIRE DAMAGE LIMIT MEDICAL E'XPENSE LIMIT: CONTRACTOR'S POLLUTION LIABILITY EACH POLLUTION CONDITION LIMIT: PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY EACH CLAIM LPAIT: SITE SPECIFIC THRID PARTY POLLUTION LIABILITY EACH CLAIM LIMIT. ADVANCE AN-D DEPOSIT PREMIL;4I: NIT IMUN AN'Ni9AL P tE'+7iL^�4: - Retroactive Date for Professional Liability only: 03/09/94 Business Description: Environmental Consultant 5 2,000,000. S 1,000,000. S 1,000,000. S 1,000,000. S 50,000. Any One Fire S 5,000. Any One Person S 1,000,000 S 1,000,000 S NIA FOP—NIS AND ENDORSE'\IENTS ATTACHED TO THIS POLICY: GL00010899 EEIC-06-0100 EEIC-43-0100 IE-0001-04"00 IE-0004-0200 IE-0005-0200 IE-0006-0200 IE-0007.0200 IE-0035-0300 1E-0036-0300 IE-0037-0300 IE-0043-0300 IL00171135 —� By: Countersignature (if applicable) A�Z,iorized Representative Stale of CaVomia•Heallh and Wellare Agency Deparenent of Health Services LEAD HAZARD EVALUATION REPORT ection 1-Date of Lead Hazard Evaluation 11/27100 Section 2-Type of Lead Hazard Evaluation (Check one box only) tI Lead inspection ❑ Risk assessment ❑ Clearance inspection Section 3-Structure Where Lead Hazard Evaluation Was Conducted Address (number, street, apartment (if applicable) City County 1329 1 Los Angeles ❑ Other (specify) ZIP code Construction date (year) of Type of structure (check one box only) structure Unknown p Single family dwelling ❑ Niulti-unit building O Child -occupied facility O Other (specify) Section 4-Owner of Structure (If business/agency, list contact person) Name Telephone number Community Development Commission 3238907240 Address (number, street, apartment (if applicable) City State ZIP code 2 Coral Circle Monterey Park CA 91755 Section 5-results of Lead Hazard LvaJuation (unecx one box only) ❑ No lead -based paint detected. A lead inspection was conducted following the procedures outlined in Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 8, No lead -based paint was detected during this lead inspection. This structure is found to be lead -based paint free. 7 No lead hazards detected. Lead hazard evaluation was conducted following the procedures outlined in Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 8. No lead hazards were detected. I@ Lead -based paint andlor lead hazards detected. Lead hazard evaluation was conducted following the procedures outlines in Title 17, California Code of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 8. Lead -based paint and/or lead hazards were detected. Section 6-Individual Conducting lead Hazard Evaluation Name Telephone number Matt Crochet 310-517-0805 Address (number, street, apartment (if applicable) City State ZIP code 22850 Crenshaw Blvd. Suite 200 Torrance CA 90505 Brand name and serial number of any portable x-ray fluorescence (XRF) instrument used (if applicable) RMD OHS certification number Signature Date -Attachments A. A foundation diagram or sketch of the structure indicating the specific locations of each lead hazard or presence of lead -based paint: B. Each testing method, device, and sampling procedure used; C. All data collected, including quality control data, laboratory results, including laboratory name, address, and phone number. First copy and attachments retained by inspector Second copy and a<iachmenls retained by owner Third copy only (no attachments) mailed to. Department of Health Services Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Brno. Reports 1515 Clay Street, No. 1801 Oakland, CA 94612 OHS e552 (12197) !] A C�iill BEDROOM 3 CS CH CH DH cH i i GARAGE E Cs Cs BEDROOM 2 CS �J KITCHEN BEDROOMI LAUNDRY� ;j es ROOM CS CS CS Single Family Residence 1321 Any Street Los Angeles, CA Pro;ect K 201055 LEGE'Z: CS= CFvG: E*fr DH0 DOIM E FUHG B LOrlg neaen uepartmenc OT meaan ana rtuman Jervices- Laaoratory Ulvision — 2525 Grand Avenue Long Beach, Ca 90815 562-570-144077 A1HA accreditation # 102620- �l'Ii�I1TTFR: ( (Narne) Barr - Onrlt Street. 22850 Crenshaw Blvd. Ste, 200 On, Torrance Zip 90505 Fax: 3101517-022 1 ncarjon or Collection; (;\rune) Single Family Residence Street: 1321 Cigc Client: Project No. HUD Zip: -ne of Material: (Xl Dust NNipe Date Collected: 11/100 Date Received: I U29l00 "t Reauected: (X] Lead Content Relinquished By: Matt Crochet Time Collected: Time Received: 3:59 pm A4cthod of Analysis: W EPA 7420 (x].4STt11613 (QQ Reporting Limit: S ug/n•ipe Sample Preparation Method: (x] EPA 3051 l^ficro=Jcr) � <vRL?- less than reporting limit v 11/ 30/00 �/ 7 �C•✓ i C 11 /30/00 Tested fr Reported by Lu e _ 12r•:ewelly � Analyst Date Afae,\?;i6ido, QC/Q4 Man.:ger or Date Bruce Fuj.6-xa, QA Afanager ------'----------------------------------------------------- - -ILab Reaort LAB. NO. I Sample ID or 'No. IDimensions• I Resultslunits nechurit 0unncltfs in inches ug/sq.ft. 00 PB4264 I Living roorn/entEv — floor 1 12 x 12 1 2431 00 PB4265 I Kitchen -floor 112 x 12 1 255 LEAD TEST REQUEST FOR\1 DATE Page 1/1 Fonn 051100 1llILEO: DATE/F[ /l/� GSEE&};EO /� i� ��� Ba: r &- Clark.cnvironmenfal 23505 Crenshaw Blvd, Suite 201 Torrancy Cal Jorrla 90303 (310) 31 i-0S03 Fax (310) 51 i-0822 Raguest For Laboratory Services Project None: Project Address ' 1 Submi ved By: `� T Nuriber of Samples: Analysis Type: AAS Lead reported in c. >: me/=2 ' u�/fr�.. ppm Protocol: HUD Turn Around (dd�.): 24HRS / Normal Samole.A7amber DescripdotvEocaeion y+1 I si•" xiR.jR/Y ivat' i I!;.{r1 J � � rt ,Iry tti �� i ;r�'-'..� ,- y—,� "t�•�\�li.W..�.f .. G�I�3� s• E?!.4 'I+?P C+. '.I. •, ���f,�� }..�..4. .F�t t' giJ*r Lri �; t ax•+,.•x•�.••r.a:• 1C• yam• `�^.rt'�*.S;�k `�A_ t� Yt-'��e %x..... � � 1�-:.711 �-„ 2„'i' rA��� e.� �`•.CJ! A►''.S 4 j s .•.•b� � rm�1c yip ii•• GU 1: �,� /1'•-iiNY���-�+... {�,M,�J,,� � �T � Ilf., .n� firi`4L�..:'���6i�Jrr"sxr•'��ta.�"t..rC,� �3'��".ie�% t�'+Y: �r lei�� -— r���, nLY ,. •:. M'• a e.-.i.w uw �^�, «.✓li.'S }�_ isR.n.-`` , ' x y .�r,,. �t'.',E yy-e ��y�t,."[}�7t' ..4�{•,��..�L���.l. Yf-w�'�t �a ...1:�Zl��i%�:J3.7.-. �:• ^'p�F.,�����.0"S'.��i4...x JR T:S� 5: •:Y�,V'j `Vf.� � y. . WPSR4 tli r rr ri'Y,r`'�..'z•-��a +;ran..:.,:' „�•...'�L"-' Relinquished By: I'Tazne: .. ' . - Signature: Date: Received By: Name:y ("I wid Si_znature: d& (►c., Date: w!_ ueparrrnent or rleaun ana rluman )er` i6ei zs-"LauorziW y uiv siult — 2525 Grand Avenue Long Beach, Ca 90815 AIHA (ELLAP) accreditation no. 102620 562-570.c0-; C1'13NIMER: (.Name) jiarr S: Clark Environmental Srrccr—Mi0� Crenshaw Bly Cirp: Torrance Zip 90505 Fax 310.51 J.022 I oration nrCollectinn: (Naiuc1 C.F.R. Street: 1321 Ciq• Zip Clienr. Project. o.: HUD e of Material: (\1 Soil Dace Collected: 11/100 Date Received: I1116100 r ReQvestcd: IXI Lead Content Relinquished By: Man Crochet Time Collected: Time Received: 3:25 pm Method of Analysis: W EPA 7420 (x)ASTM 1613 (QC) Reporting Limit: 60 ppm Sample Preparation Method: (x) EPA 3C31(,4ficrot.atx) <RL = less than Reporting Limit Tested &Reported by_Tohn Lulev 11/30/00 Rei wed ly Reporting � 11/,0/00 Analyst Date Mae. ikaido, QC/QA Manager or Date Brace Fujikawa, QA Manager , =ILab Report I= LAB. NO. I Sample ID or No. I Dimensions I Results/units SNecihlnr Cr�unlrelltr 00 PB4266 I Soil. perimeter - 4 subsamples I dripline 1 65,30 ppm LEAD TEST REQUEST F'OR.i1 Pace 1/1 Fonn 040,100 DATE WILED: 1l/� DATEIT ME FAXED G' -� x I Project Name: Barr & Clark Environmental 23505 Cremhaw Blvd, Suite 201 Torrance, California 90505 (310)517-0805 Fax (310) 517-0822 Request For Laboratory Services Project -r'r': Address: Tumber of Samples: Submitted By: I\ Analysis Type: AAS Lead reported in (drdo,.): rng/=2 ug/ft2,J pp Protocol: HUD Turn Around (d,.dr ): 24BRS Sample Number DescripdonlLocation 0<1 -I Relinquished By: Signature:. 4 <:� Received By: Name: Signature: e%,- 64-V 5ira- Date: — Date: V 0Id Il II - %M OALL tp-.7 MAO? enal # LEGENDS ENVIRONMENTAL INS.SVCS,LLC -DATE (MIND 10109l2001PRODUCER ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 1305 GENE AUTRY WAY ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. ANAHEIM, CA 92805 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE — LICENSE 0OC79876 (714) 634-2683 (714) 634-3704 COMPAANY EVANSTON INSURANCE CO. INSURED - COMPANY BARR & CLARK, INC. B 22850 CRENSHAW BLVD. # 200 COMPANY TORRANCE, CA 90505 C COMPANY I D 1S IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSU CE LISTED 6ELOW HAVE a EN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR E POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIRIl, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUW� NT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICASE MAY err ED' ISSUOR'MAv.-FIERTAIN, THE INSURANCE -AFFORDED BTTHE POLICIES DESCRIBED —1 IN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES, LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO —�— _ POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ( POLICY NUMBER DATE (MMIDDMI) DATE (Mill LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY OOPKG00008 3/9/00 3/9/02 GENERAL AGGREGATE S , PRODUCTS - COMPIOP AGG S 1,000,0�— A COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE ® OCCUR PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,0 OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT # EACH OCCURRENCE S 1,000,0 CONTRACTORS POLL FIRE DAMAGE (Any one Ilre) S -50.000 MED EXP (Anyone pereon) f 5,000 AUTOMOBILE LUWIUff ANY AUTO E C E I E D COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT S ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULEDAUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS OCT 2 2001 DEPARTMENT OF ; i3ODIP Y IIN 1 RY -! S Y °Len S ONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY DAMAGE S -- GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACGOENT S ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: EACH ACCIDENT S AGGREGATE S EXCESS - H'S LIAB LITY UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM - __._. _ g • s± Q:D {n d, _ .: .. .t ' � C i t At t I ;Si �1GS OCCURRENCE S GREGATE �_ — S WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND I TORY u n NER EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY r EL EACH ACCIDENT S THE PROPRIETOR/ INCL PARTNEFLVMCUTIVE OFFICERSARE: EXCL O EL DISEASE - POLI IMIT $ 'pIgjXi%W WPLOYEE IS A POT, ER LIABILITY OOPKG00008 / R E. / !02 1,000,000 CLAIMS MAKE 0' U1:56N.111ION OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH; AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND VOLUNTEERS ARE INCLUDED AS ADDITIONAL INSUREDS ON GENERAL LIABILITY PER ATTACHED ENDORSEMENT. RE: LEAD BASED PAINT TESTING AND CONSULTING *EXCEPT 10 DAY NOTICE FOR NONPAY OF PREMIUM 'REVISED CERTIFICATE SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ATTN: STEVE HOLTZ e}t>y EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL 9*W-U MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMIl THE LEFT, 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 — ' ' .,M ^'":.5,'!!4I7WTi.'. '`�t�l' 'neTrp hW •� r - I{�` :O C7WMrRLAUF=KTPRDs. Web BARB CLARK, INC. POLICY # OOFKG00008 ENDORSEMENT This endorsement issued by Evanston Insurance Company forms part of the policy to which it is attached. This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: ENVMONMENTAL BRAIRMENT LIABILITY COVERAGE PART �.._ .. :_...:..: . _ .- . CO OL•i UTION JGY UZrY 'COVBRAGE PART - PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART - COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART PRODUCTSICOMPLETED OPERATIONS LIABILITY COVERAGE PART OWNERS AND CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: CITY OF HMINGTOH BEACH; AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF BEACH, ITS AGENTS, OFFICERS, ElSPLGMS AND VOLUNTEERS. Blanket — Where required by written contract (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of "your Work" for i al insured by df for ybu. _.......... _ ... _. nPPRO-VED AS TO FOttM;. ;,AIL �IUTTOii, MY Attorney BY- Dep�,tWC7 Atto�rne�C CL i STATE COMPENSATION I N S U R A N C E FUND AUGUST 27 :=.!2i r CITY OF HUNT ATTN STEVE P.O. BOX 420807, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94142-0807 .CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION,INSURANCE.: ': . ..POUCY:NIinileFR: ?, 3 .2 — 01 �CJ=R7JFlCA7EEXPIRES:. IVIZ Z' TIt OM I C D VEl Nov MAIN sTatE 14UNTINGTON BEACW , 9264E L This is to certify that we have issued a valid Workers' Compensation insurance policy in a form approved by the California Insurance Commissioner to the employer named below for the policy period Indicated. This policy is not subject to cancellation by the Fund except upon days' advance written notice to the employer. We will also give you- iN days' advance notice should this policy be cancelled prior to its normal expiration. This certificate of insurance is not an insurance policy and does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed herein. Notwithstanding any requirement, term, or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which.,tWs :certificate of: Osu.Fance may.:b`e.issued:or, may pertaiAt-the 1nsuranc#_`affofded;by the policies >, described hereirr�is stiegt to all the`tefms;. exclusions'Siid conditions, of such poicies `3... €.. /III��� .J'6. �.W/�... :;FYI' .'^,. "?k`. .' ,.nyA• `r'i+�. AUTHORIZED REPIiESETIT 171yi` `.t `w< %z '' `' si H"' PRi=1SIDE'NT !'I�r'LOYER'S L1'APIL`t> t.Ii9IT IfJGLUDTi0i. t- it. COSTS:`'$iloo OLEO.`-PE.12' fit C'URRtNCE. ENDORSEMENT !!0035 ENTITLED ADDITIONAL I14SLIRLD EMPLOYER EFFECTIVE 08/27/01 IS ATTACHED TO AND FORMS A PART OF THIS POLICY. NAME OF ADDITIONAL INSURED: CITY OF HUMV INCTON BEACH ENDORSEME14T 02065 ENTITLED CErRTIFICATE HOLDERS' RS' NOTICE EFFECTIVE 07/01/01 iS 'A'ITAtl4t i-'T0 AfJD FORPiS' A PAFcT 'OF THIS PCLICY.�-- - _• - .. YI,. ..,H�.:.�' f•.�'•'`'.4 •.iY.'' .R :.}.+.. k�` ..f��'i.•4., f:• EMPLOYE ::.::<:.�> .•i:':`:<' BARR & CLARK ;�r::. :.�: . �.':' 22850 CRENSHAW BUID�STE 200 TORRANCE CA 90505 L THIS DOCUMENT HAS A BLUE PATTERNED BACKGROUND POLICYHOLDER'S C