HomeMy WebLinkAboutC. Edward Dilkes - Talanoff, Wallin, Kress and Dilkes - 1978-06-16TELANOFF, WALLIN, KRESS & DILKES
LAW OFFICES
RONALD M, TELANOFF 11340 WEST OLYMPIC BOULEVARD, SUITE. I4S 479-3787
SAMUEL BO LLI WSKY - LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90064 879-4520
PETER L. WALLIN -
C. EDWARD DILKES
ROBERT L. KRESS
STANTON J. PRICE June 13, 1978
Honorable Mayor and Members of the
City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
City Hall
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Re: Retainer Proposal for L. C. Smull v
City of Huntington Beach, et al.,
No 29-10-89
Honorable I7ayor ,and Members of the City Council:
This lette> is intended as a proposal pursuant to your
request of June 12, 1978. Our firm would be prepared to assume
responsibility for the above -entitled litigation on an emergency
basis, on the terns and conditions set forth below. We would
note at the outset that your own City Attorney, Gail Hutton, would,
under normal circumstances, be ably qualified to handle this
litigation. We understand that this proposal has been requested
only as a result of the current emergency circumstances in City
Hall stemming from the approval of Proposition 13, the pendency
of another piece of major litigation which will commence trial
this month, and the incomplete staffing which Ms. Hutton currently
must labor with. Under these circumstances, we would be pleased
_o assist the City in accordance with the terms of this proposal.
Our firm would assume responsibility for representation
of the City of Hun; ;ton Beach on n interim basis. We would
be compensated at an hourly rate o-�80--88 per hour for all `,pork
performed, including research, drafting, court appearances, pre-
paration, investigation, and the providing of advice and opinions
to City staff and members of the Council.
We understand „hat the Charter and Ordinances of the City
of Huntington Beach provide for such contracted services on an
emergency basis, but impose a limitation of $2500 upon the amount
of such contract. Accordingly, we are prepared to undertake the
representation outlined above up to and including the sum of $2500.
AMIL
TELANOFF, WALLIN, KRESSK DILKES
LAWOFFICES
Honorable Mayor and Members of the
City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
June 13, 1978
Page Two
At this point, we estimate that a demurrer, answer, and s:,-
mission of points and authorities,as outlined in the attached
confidential memorandum, and a hearing on the Petition will not
consume more than such amount in terms of our compensation.
However, even if we prevail at the hearing we could not expect
the case to end there. Petitioner would most likely seek leave
to amend to - 'ege additional facts and theories, and eventually
appeal, and in all likelihood the total expenses of defense
will far exceed $2500 before the City obtains a successful and
final resolution either through litigation or settlement.' Accord-
ingly, we request that the Council commence discussions concerning
its posture towards settlement and/or contracting the entire
defense through the City's bidding procedures.
For now, we would agree to commence the representation
within the proposed $2500 limitation, but wish that it be under-
stood at the outset that, should this limit-tion be exceeded, we
would be requesting additional compensation` from the Council.
We would further agree to cooperate fully with City
staff and with representatives of Ms. Hutton'-s office, and would
anticipate full cooperation from them to reduce the complexity
and cost of this litigation.
Finally, we would expect that all costs incurre" in the
course of this litigation be borne by the City of Huntington Beach,.
Obviously, thesr. are costs which would: be required whether_ we
represented: the City or the representation was obtained through
the existing offices of the City Attorney. Accordingly, such costs,
including fil:Lng fees, costs of deposition, preparation of exhibits
and costs of duplication, messengers, a.r;.d related expenses be
borne by the City outside the scope of our agreement. We would be
happy to advance such costs from our office, but would expect re-
imbursement upon transmittal of the bills to the City. Our own
services will be billed on the first day of each month, and will
cover all work performed during the preceding month. The bills
for our compensation will be transmitted as separate items from
the costs advanced.
We would ask that the Council place all bills, for costs
and for compensation, on the next succeeding claims and demands
and, upon ,approval, remit the sums then due to our offices at the
address set forth above.
i
TELAIJOFF, WALLIN., KRES & DILKES
LAW OFFICES.
Honorable Mayor and Members of the
City Council of the City of I3untington Beach
June 13, 1978
Page Three
For your convenience, we have prepared this proposal in
contract form, and when approved by the Council and executed by
the Mayor, it will constitute our retainer agreement.
Again, we are pleased to of assistance in this
situation, and will endeavo- to give this matter our very best
efforts. If there are any questions concerning this retainer
agreement or the litigation, .eel free to contact our offices.
Very truly yours,
TELANOFF, KRESS & D LK
I
BY: G. EDWARD DILKES
Approved:
t .1 s'
June 20 1978 fi y
DATE �
MAYOR, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
BY:
City Cle k
APPROVED AS TO FORM
GAIL C-IU±TON
City Attorney
t
4w.
Jj City of Huntington. Beach
P.O. BOX 990 CALIFORNIA 9264
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
June 27, 1978
Mr. C. Edward Di1kes
Talanoff, Wallin, Kress & Dilkes
11340 West Olympic �1vd., Suite 145
Los Angeles, CA, 90064
Dear Mr. Di 1 kes c
The City Council of the, City of Huntington Beach at its meeting
held June 16, 1978, approved your contract proposQl to represent
the City for $75 an hour up to but not exceeding $2,500 on a
non -continuing contract basis.
Enclosed is an Executed copy of the letter agreement for your
file
Sincerely,
Alic4'v M, Wentworth
City t1erk
AMW:bt
I Enclosure
IRMO
Page #2 - Council Minutes 6/16/78
AYES: MacAllister, Bailey, Mandic,, Shenkman
NOES:. Thomas, Siebert
ABSENT: Pattinson - 7
On motion by MacAllister, second Shenkman, Council authorized the City Attorney
to hire a Deputy Attorney III, Step "E", by the following roll call vote
AYES: MacAllister, Bailey, Mandic, Shenkman
NOES; Thomas, Siebert
ABSENT: Pattinson
RECESS - RECONVENED
Council recessed at noon and Councilman Thomas left the meeting at that time. The
meeting was reconvened at 1:00 P.M. by the Mayor.
HARBORS AND BEACHES PRESENTATION MOOR -HOUSE
Vincent Moorhouse presented the 78-79 FY proposed budget for the Department of Harbors
,d Beaches.
IERGENCY REQUEST - CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Gail Hutton interrupted the meeting to inform Council of�'the Warner-
Gol'denwest Redevelopment hearing being held in Superior Court Business Properties,
Inc. vs. City. Deputy City Attorney Mark Travis requested an immediate response to
a contract proposal by * Dukes to represent the City for,$80.00 an hour, up to
but not exceeding $2,500 Discussion was held by Council and it was agreed by Mrs.
Hutton that Mr. Dilkes would agree to $75.
On motion by MacAllister, second Bailey, Council approved the payment from the Con
tinge cy Fund of the amended amount of $75 an hour, up to but not exceeding $2,500
to 71,Led Dilkes, on ,a non -continuing contract basis. The motion passed by the follow-
ing roll call vote;
AYES: MacAllister, Bailey, Siebert, Shenkman
NOES: None
ABSENT': Thomas, Pattinson
HARBORS AND BEACHES - CONTINUED PRESENTATION
Mr. Moorhouse continued his presentation and gave several suggestions for upgrading
his operation in the future, including computerized cash registers in the conces-
sions, Parking Authority purchase of State surplus property at PCH and Highway 39,
two added pier restaurants and upgrading existing pier projects:
Considerable discussion was held, with Councilman MacAllister in support of the
Harbors and Beaches program, including the sandman patrol.
Discussion was held over Councilwoman Bailey's concern over the lifeguard service
at the State Beaches and the inherent problems.
Following discussion regarding stafting and rental equipment, the Harbors and Beaches
presentation and discussion concluded,