HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS - 1956-08-06i
RESOLD i —,.1
R12 10
'Recording Requested by
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS.
When Recorded Mail to
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Box 2304 'Terminal Annex.
Los Angeles, California 90054
RE[-6/g
302 i
aov 8649 PAG;L 882
Passed by C.H.C.
AN 2 6190
RECORD O AT iiLQUEST OF
INVIS14N OF NI"AYS
IN OFF1CIAl- FIZCORDS OF
ORANGE 00UNTY, CALIF.
9:05 AM JUL 3 1%8
J. WYLIE CARLYLE, County Recorder
RELINQUISHMENT OF HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY IN THE FREE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, ROAD 07—ORA-405-17.0
REQUEST NO. 618 C4
WHEREAS, by freeway agreement dated February 1, 1960,
and by City Council Resolution No. 1435 dated September 19, 1960,
% between the City of Huntington Beach and the State of California,
+ the City -agreed to accept title to a frontage road and relocated
and reconstructed city street, upon relinquishment thereof to said
City by the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the State of California has acquired right of
way for and has constructed the above mentioned collateral facilities
in the City of Huntington Beach at McFadden Avenue, road 07-Ora-405,
in accordance with said agreement and resolution; and
WHEREAS, this Commission has found and determined, and
does hereby find and determine, that it is desirable and in the
public interest that said collateral facilities be relinquished
to the City of Huntington Beach for use as city streets;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS VOTED by the California Highway
Commission that it relinquish, and it does hereby relinquish, to
the City of Huntington Beach, effective upon the recordation of a
sooK 8b49 PAGE 883
0
certified copy hereof with the Recorder of Orange County, all of
the State of California's right, title and interest in and to said
collateral facilities in said City, together with the right of way
and appurtenances thereof, described as follows:
All that portion of an altered city street and frontp,3e
road shown as Parcel 1 as delineated and shaded on maps recorded
on May 31, 1967 in State Highway Map Book No: 5, pages 38 and 39,
inclusive, Records of Orange County.
EXCEPTING and RESERVING to the State of California any
and all rights of ingress to and egress from the highway hereby
relinquished in and to the adjoining freeway, except at such points
as now axe or may be established by resolution of this Commission.
u
THIS IS To CERTIFY That the foregoing is a full and correct
copy of the original resolution duly passed by the California
Highway Commission at its meeting, rquiariy called and he!
,J u.::.
on the__ ____day of
in the City
Dated#us__.___....... .... day
of`_G1
ROBERT T. MARTIN
ASSISTANT SECRETARY Of THE
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY COMMISSION
99T. "S. 11012./00 4-41 !M O.F
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRANSPORTATION ATION AGENCY
EPAT?TttPNT inV VI TRY I(`' lUnDyc•
V� <.JLLtt.- ry Vl1,1% 3
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
RIGHT OF WAY MAPS OF
REL- 618
o+r v, F: 1
C LC !► fC�►
coo p dL!
k1C YA► b 3
,--ays
PC MAP .as
RRpr,r Rn,04.0 .-r.,
f/A�♦ 9 /41Cr
f
Recorded in the Office
of the County Recorder
ORANGE COUNTY
AS "LT sd! SCALE
_,. �..1 r
+ FATE OF CALIFORNIA—TRANSPORTATION AGENCY RONALD REAGAN, Governor
j DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS . F
DISTRICT 7. P.O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 90054
MA 0-3700
March 16, 1967
07-Ora-O-HntB
Supplemental Agreement
Number S-1
Project No. 126
Mr. James R. Wheeler
Director of Public Works
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California
Dear Sir:
Attached is the jointly executed duplicate copy
of Supplemental Agreement No. S-1 to the Master Agree-
ment covering expenditure of State -Allocated Section
2107 funds for the 1966-67 fiscal year for your City.
The Special Provisions provide for the widening
of Talbert Avenue, Slater Avenue, and Heil Avenue at
their intersections with Beach Boulevard, and traffic
signals and lighting with channelization of Beach Boule-
vard at the intersections of Yorktown Avenue, Garfield
Avenue, Talbert Avenue, Slater Avenue, and Heil Avenue,
Project No. 126.
Very truly yours,
A. C. BIRNIE
Deputy District Engineer
By
adJM_•Vb
A. A. SMITH
Assistant District
Attch
Engiswr
CITY OF
HUNTINGTON
• A�I�/%�1i1i' Ib
r.
cove wffN_ _
Ctic N v!r _
wt "^P was
mtr w.. PCs__
ws w« uo's
1 _
��/..�s.+W�..riwr�iwa r'iw/��a�AwM�s���.Nor/�•.�..r1�.�..Y.•✓.�.-V�y���4'.����a�M-•�.�-��..Y.w.��r��•.rr/.+f��.v r✓i War�R�i.r►A.�.F •-ti �e .s• • .. .. �
SO
s'-e % .:r« i4
7'-4'X. Apllr \\\,
BEACH
PARCEL]
`.�, .• sd► dr.
Afhe
�'.•. �..ri. '�. t . iJ 01 . Iy�•A/
'� .r�s-aroe w•.
� f .. .�i9e• _ �srsps.
JI!•A4;�d•E � 1fO�rp•. .�.. 1 Jd,S►',.$•ivE-
Sdi%
p /fpGTp
I ,,,oral
�lB4J�yBL
'ocerded in the office
f the County Recorder
ORANGE COUNTY
S.ti.M.s. No. s PQ. 39
May 3r, 1967
mmw
mm�m\k=,i
'
1
1
1 i
ti
INTERSTATE
SlAlf Of CALlrOliftlA
IWANSPORTAT10% aG/*C•
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION! OF HIGHWAYS
PROPOSED RELINQUISHMENT
AM& TO st 2111•ouls"to s.ow% T.lus r—�—
ACCESS PROWS1TM ituln nnul
a icrs ova
U
fir'
-,r e' 9
�f
v`r •t f f, c
CITY OF awlp SVrP- A Mr. 6-6h,
----------------- a------------------
CALIFORNIA
March 6, 1967
State of California
Division of Highways
District 7 - P.O. Box 2304
Los Angeles, California 90054
Attention: A. A. Smith
Assistant District Engineer
Re: 07-Ora-O-HntB
Supplemental
Agreement S-1
Project 126
Dear Sir:
We sre returning herewith. the copy of SupOemental
Agreement S-1. sent to us for our (ilea. Said
Agreement was not executed or dated on behalf of
the State, which is required in the case of our
file copy.
Please have same properly executed and return to
this office.
Sincerely yours,
Paul C. Jones
City Clerk
PCJ:aw
Enc.
ir
1' ITATE 6P CALIFORNIA-TRANSPORTATION AGENCY RONALD REAGAN, Governor
1 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DISTRICT 7, P.O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES M54
620-3?00
March 2, 1967
07-Ora-O-HntB
Supplemental
Agreement S-1
Project 126
Mr. James Wheeler
City Engineer
City of Huntington Beach
P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California
Dear Mr. Wheeler:
We are returning herewith one copy of Supplemental
Agreement No. S-1 to be regained in the City files.
Very truly yours,
A. C . BIRVIE
Deputy District Engineer
By
A. A. SM3TH
Assistant District Engineer
Enclosure
v
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Huntington Beach, California
February 7, 1967
Honorable Mayor
and City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Attention: Mr. Doyle Miller
City Administrator
Subject: Supplemental Agreement No. S-1
Beach Blvd. Traffic Signals
Gentlemen:
Enclosed is the Supplemental. Agreement No. S-1 which
covers special provisions for the contract to widen and
construct traffic signals on Beach Boulevard at Heil, Slater,
Talbert, Garfield, and Yorktown by the Division of Highways.
It is respectfully requested that your Honorable Body
approve the supplemental agreement and adopt the attached
resolution.
Please authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement
and resolution and direct the City -Clerk to return the fully
executed agreement to this office for transmittal'to the
State.
Very truly yours,
(—,,,,-"James R. Wheeler
Director of Public Works
JRW:PEC:ace
Encl.
In
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMEM NO. S-1
lg 66 _ 6T FISCAL YEAR
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT entered into by and between
the City of Hunting Beach hereinafter referred
to as the City, and the State Department of Public Works,
Division of Highways, hereinafter referred to as the Department,
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS a master agreement for the budgeting and the
expenditure of funds allocated from the State Highway Fund
to cities was executed
by the
City
February 23
, 1961,
and by the Department
March
T
, 19 61;
and,
WHEREAS the City and the Department now desire that said
agreement be supplemented to provide for the work described
In the City Is budget for the 19 66 -_§L fiscal year, as approved
by the Department'on October 2$0 1,066
NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the
City and the Department that said agreement be supplemented
as follows:
SPECIAL PROv 10Y.S FOR PROJECT '226
This project conBlats of widening 'Talbert Avenue, Slater
Avenue and Heil Avenue at their intersections with Beach Boule-
vard, Route 39, and installing traffic sign^1e and highway
lighting with channelization of Beach Boulevard at the inter-
sections of Yorktown Avenue, Oarfield Avenue, Talbert Avenue,
Slater Averrie and Heil Avenue,
In consideration of the benefits to be derived from this
improvement, the City and the Department do mutually agree to
cooperates and jointly participate in the improvement an follows,.
•1-
1. THE DEPARTMW AGREES%
A. To prepare the necessary plane and specifications
and administer the contract for the construction
of the aforementioned improvements.
B. To bear one-half (1/2) the cost of the traffic
signal and highway lighting systema on Beach
Boulevard at the intersections of Yorktown
Avenue, Garfield Avenue, Talbert Avenue, Slater
Avenue and Heil Avenue.
C. To bear the east of all roadway construction
within the projected right of -way of Beach
Boulevard except the construction of curb
returns at Talbert Avenue and Slater Avenue.
D. To coordinate all necessary utility relocations.
R. To hold the City, its officers, agents and
employees harmless from claims for damage or
liability resulting from the Departmentla
work accomplished or omitted under the terms
of this Agreement.
11, THE Cn"f AGRSSS t
A. To bear one -halt' {1/.) the cost of the traffic
signal and highway lighting systems. on Beach
Boulevard at the intersections of Yorktown
Avenue, Oarfield Avenue, Talbert Avenue and
Slater Avenue.
B. To bear one-fourth (1/4) the cost of the traffic
signal and highway lighting eyetem on Beach
Boulevard at Heil Avenue.
C. To bear the cost of all roadway construction
within the City which is outside the projected
right or way lines of Beach Boulevard,
D. To bear the cost of constructing necessary
curb returns at the intersection of Beach
Boulevard with Talbert Avenue and Slater
Avenue,
• B. Should any portion of the Cityle participating
share be ineligible for State -allocated Sunda,
the City will pay this portion from other City
funds.
-2-
ONN
F. To hold the Depar nts its offleeres agents
and employees harmless from claims for damage
due to the alteration of the previously ex-
isting drainage pattern resulting from the
above -mentioned construction and from claims
for damage as a result of City action or
omission in accordance with the tersms of this
Agreement.
G. To provide clear of improvementss all right of
►rap within the City outside the projected
right of gray lines of Beach Boulevard necessary
for the project.
III. IT IS MTUALLY UNDEMOOD AND AGREED:
A. The estimated
City share of
this project is
as follows:
Contract Items
Quantity
__.
Unit Cost
Amount
----
Removing Markers
7
ea.
$ 1.00
7.00
Removing Headwalls
1
ea.
100.00
100.00
Remove Painted Tr.Stripe -1399
L.F.
.15
209.65
Clearing and Orubbing
L.S.
350.00
Fern. & Apply Water
19)
Mal
3.00
570.00
Roadway Rx.
2260
C.Y.
J-50
7s9i0.00
Structure Lx.,
45
C.Y.
.00
20.00
Structure Backfill
27
C.Y.
9.00
243.00
Class 4 Agg. Subbase
VA9
Ton
3.00
5,5447.00
Class 2 Agg. Base
129�3
Ton
3.00
, .00
Agg. (Type B A.C.)
447.2
Ton
10.00
�A72,00
Paving Asphalt (A.C.)
24.2 Ton
10.00
242.00
Liquid Asphalt SC-250
2.8
Ton
85.00
238.00
(Prime Coat)
Class "A" Concrete
J;
C.Y.
300.00
1,200.00
(minor Structure)
29" x 18" CHP Arch
32
L.F.
10.00
32v.0o
(16 gauge)
4J" x 27" Clap Arch
50
L.F.
20.00
500.00
12 gauge)
Visa. Iron &nd Steel
503
lb.
.50
251.50
Class "C" FCC
5.9
C.Y.
35.00
206.50
(Pipe Reinforcement)
Class "B" FCC
44.8
C.Y.
35.00
1,568.00
( Curb & Gutter)
Markers
6
ea.
10.00
60.00
Install Tr.Sig. & Hwy.
L.S.
Ltg. Systems
i
_3
f
Contract Items
Quantity Unit Cost Amount
Location
A -
Yorktown Avenue -
122161.00
Location
B-
Garfield Avenue
12,134.00
Location
C -
Talbert Avenue
120112.00
Location
D -
Slater Avenue
12*085.00
Location
S -
Heil Avenue,
5,301.00
Sub -total Contract Items * 81,951.85
STATIC FURNISHED HATERIAL:3
Traffic Signal Lamps * 45.0o
Paint for Traffic Signal Equipment 45.00
Sub -total
Contingencies
Sub -total
Call
ENGIMRIM
Construction Engineering 10%
Total
Call
� 82,041.85
4,102.09
864143.94
86,250.00
* 8o62,5_00
94,875.00
94,500.00
B. The final cost to the City shall be the total final
cost of the herainbefore described City's share of
the work Computed on the basis of unit bid prices
In the Department's contract, and the final quan-
tities covering materials, equipment and labor for
all work including contingency items; to which a
flat 10 per cent charge will be added for con9truo-
tion engineering.
C. Contingency items shall include, but not be limited
to, construction sign depreciation, moving, erecting
and repairing signs, services rendered for the
Resident Engineer and his quarters, and work accom-
plished under extra work orders pertinent to the
construction of the City+s share of the work.
D. That in the construction of said .cork, the Department
will furnish a Resident Engineer to perform the usual
functions of a Resident Engineer, and the City may
also furnish a Resident Engineer if it so desires, aad
that the said two Resident Engineers will cooperate
and consult with each other, but the orders of the
State Resident Zngineer will be final.
-4-
M
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have affixed
their //signatures and official seals, the City on the date
d4e-O , 19 67 , and the Departnent on the /yl4 day
o f ��a�c-cam• , 39 67 .
Approval recommended:
t �
DkpurrDistri ngineer
ngineer o ity and
County Projects
Approved as to form
and procedure:
�at . . UJ�kj, xk�
ttorney, partment of
Public Works
0
CITY OF 11UNTIMT0:1 BrJ.CH
B
a,&7-
AYOR
City &Ierk --
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
B
Assistant State Highway
Engineer
-5-
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
RESOLUTION l:o. 2511
A R-SOLUTICPa OF TtIAZ CIi v CCsrI:CIL or .CIE
CITY OF 11UNTINGT03� BZ-AC:i SUPPLE-
Y.-ENT',L S - 1 FOR :.XF-7--.:DITU!1E OF
FUNDS LLLOCt.TZD FROM THED STATE HIGHWAY FUND
TO CITIE-Se
h'}iEREtL a surplcmertal to the mcster egreement execut-
ed Mvreh 7th, 19619 betlecon the :_tote Deprrtment of Iublic
VOeace, Division of 11lF;hwayc9 end the City of HuntinZton Beach
has been presented to the Council for consideration; end
the Council hes heard resd said egreenent
end la Scallicr with the "contents thereof;
NOW9 T11ZaEFC1iE, BE IT f:ESOLVED by the City Council
of the City, of Huntington Beach that said suj:plementel agree-
ment be end the same is hereby approvcd and the Hayor add
the City Clork ere directed to sign the vme on behalf of
said City, said Agreement to be binding upon the City upon
Its bxecuticn by the authorized officials of the Stetee
PA°:�SED AND ADOPT= by the City Counell of the City
Of Huntington Beach, Cel.ifornia, at a regular meeting there-
of held on the 20th dry of February _, 1967-
ATTF.ST s
Yaul C. Jones
city cler
Jakr,_X.Stewart .., ,....,_
l,,ayor
APF:39IED 1Z TO FORM s
N. DnLC HUSH
K. DALE BUSH
City Attorney
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Res. No. 2511
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss
CITY OF HUNTIi1GTON BEACH )
I, PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected, qualified and
actin- City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-
officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby
certify that the whole number of members of the City Council
of the City of Huntington reach is seven; that the foregoing
resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of
more than a majority of all the members of said City- Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th
day of February 1967 ! by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:
Coen, Bartlett, Gisler, Kaufman, Shipley, Green,
Stewart
NOES: Councilmen:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
The foregoing in-rument is a correct copy
of the original on fife in this office.
City Clerk acid Ex-ofi' Clerk of th City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach,CaL
7�
Paul C. Jones
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Heath, California
s'TAt[ OF CALIFORNIA '
DRPARTMENT Or PUBLIC WORK[ t 0 .. r
8. urr
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS OSAx4z.,...Los A.�aiu. u. CALIF.u►u
DISTRICT VI1 P,ar.e"A.,.o"a3020
MAlUP40 ADDAff.
SOX A304. T[RMINAL ANN[X
LOS ANGELES 54. CALIFORNIA
sLEAit R[Rl!
January 31, 1964 tO 1"Lt "..
ENGIVEERING
VII-Ora-HntB
Project E-5
Mr. James H. Wheeler
City Engineer
P 0 Box 190 -
Huntington Beach, Calif
Dear Sir!
Enclosed is an approval of Project E-5 of
the budget proposed -tor the 1963-64 fiscal year.
It is suggested that this -appro ad budget
proposal be attached to your Master Agree= t covering
the budgeting of engineering�urids-ands ectlon
5107.5 of the Streets and Highvays Code.
Very truly youurss
A. C. BIRNIE
District Engin5cr
By�� -
M. . BA c
District City and County
Projects Engineer
Enal
.1 s
5
STATE HIGHWAY ENGINEER
Sacramento, California
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
�1.19.63 — . Fiscal Tear
(TO BE TRANSMITTED THROUGH DISTRICT ENGINEER).
A. C. BTRNIE, DISTRICT ENGDIEER
Address - LOS ANGELES,_
BUDGET PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING FUNDS.
The City of Runtint;ton Beach ._ pursuant
to Section 2107.5 of the Streets and Highways Code providing for the allocation and expenditure
of State Highway Funds for engineering costs and administrative expenses in respect to city
streets does hereby submit this application as its budget proposal for the estimated expenditure
recommended to be made during the _ 1963%64 fiscal year. All work accomplished
by this budget shall be done under We —forms of the master a regiment covering the budgeting of
these funds as executed on rL'.'t'?`."29'�2 _MarcK _25r 1960
(date)
PROPOSED BUDGET
Project E— Work by City $ _18 00a Total $ 16 000
Work by Dept.
Eligible Items: as set forth In Article ll'of the master agreement.
FUNDS AVAILABLE
Savings -- project EL-3 26.Oo
Accrued and unallocated to June 30, 1963 -------------- 1200000 00
Allocation 196 -196 - fiscal year (Lstis ted-A �QPtIaIL';Etit) b'000. 00
Total --�`
,02 .00
Approval Recommended:
District ty ooperatrve
Projects Engineer
(District ngineer
Director of Public SbrIzz
Official title
Budget Approved: •_ -
- d to
A.r3 T,grneer of City wd Coopera.five Projocts
To be submitted in triplicate with copy of resolution approving proposed budget. PINM MC-17 (Rev. 3-60)
r
•
.0
BTAT[ OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DISTRICT V11
HAILING ADDRESS
BOX 2302. TERMINAL ANNEX
LOS ANGELES 54. CALIFORNIA.
July 26, 1963
To: City Clerk
r�
Iso a. anliK, ar�.er�
LO. AI.O.La. l.. CALII.
rKOKsI MA.ssom 0.S030
►LaA.a RAPER
TO /ILA No.
VII-Ora-HntB
Attached are tabulations showing the quarterly apportionment
and quarterly payment of 518X gas tax funds to incorporated cities
in District VII of the Division of Highways. These funds are made
available to the cities for expenditurres on major city streets under
provisions of Section 2107 of the Streets and Highways Code.
Quarterly -payments to each city frequently vary from the
apportionment for the same quarter as payments may be made to a
city only to the extent authorized in the city's approved budget
proposal. Payments may exceed the quarterly apportionments where
previously apportioned but unbudgeted funds have accumulated to the
credit of that city. Payments may be less than the quarterly
apportionments when the total of the approved budget is less than the
funds available or to become available, or when a segment of the
apportionment is to..be withheld for work by another agency on a
cooperative basis. I -
The funds provided in this quarterly payment are to be used for
the purposes included in your approved budget proposal. If you have
budgeted for both construction and maintenance, you may divide this
particular payment in any ratio you find convenient. You are reminded
that expenditures may not exceed the amounts budgeted.
Should you have questions with respect to either the quarterly
apportionment or the quarterly payment, please contact -this office.
R JL 3 013 AM i
T
�� �i,,?2..,,i Y
'JE
L
E
K
�r :•r t r^ C i.
14LB,dC
Mel
Very truly yours,
A. C. BIRNIE
District Engineer
?_n�l
. �6l
By
M. L. BAUDERS
District City'and County
Projects Engineer
JULY 1963 APPORTIONMSIl1' OF GAS TAX
FUNDS FOR EXPENDITURE ON CITY STREETS
DISTRICT VII (Continued)
Cit9
Population
Amount
Los Angeles County (ContTd)
Sierra Madre
10,850
$' 8Olg.4o
Signal Hill
4,62
3:419.89
South E1'Monte
5,204
3,846.36
South Oats
53,831
39*787.33
South Pasadena
19,706
14o565.01
Temple City
37,758
27,907.53
Torrance
114,300
84,480.92
Vernon
22
169.26
Walnut
93
690.33
West Covina
588olOO
42, 42.662
Whittier
_ 7 ,75O
Totals
5,420,221
$4,006,170.14
Orange County
Anaheim
"133,TOO
98,819.76
Brea
90880
7302.46
Buena Park
57,100
42:203.50
Costa Mesa
57,100
42*203.50
Cypress
6,350
4,693.39
Dairyland
622
459.73
' Fountain Valley
2,068
1,528.49
Fullerton.
64,100
47,37 1
'Garden Grove
107,600
79,52 4
Hunting,ton Beach.
42,300.
31,264.59 Y
Laguna Beac
10,600
78334.63
Le Habra
34,350
25:388.62
Los Alamitos
5,975
4,416.22.
Newport Beach
N,400
2 ,208.23
Orange
,100
3 ,073.23
Placentia
= 8,725
6,448.79
San Clements
10,500
7,760.72
San Juan Capistrano
1,848
1,365. 9
-3-
7/19/63
PAYMENTS OF GAS TAX ALLOCATION
TO CITIES FOR JULY 1963 QUARTER
FOR EXPENDITURES ON CITY STREETS
In accordance with Section 2107 of the Streets
and Highways Code
Treasurer,
City
of
Hermosa Beach
$ 17,932.00
Treasurer,
City
of
Huntington Beach
107,030.65"
Treasurer,
City
of
Huntington Park
23,399.16
Treasurer,
City
of
Industry
924.00
Treasurer,
City
of
Irwindale
17,061.81
Treasurer,
City
of
La Habra
29,548.08
Treasurer,
City
of
Lakewood
93,302.66
Treasurer,
City
of
La Mirada
20,627.45
Treasurer,
City
of
La Puente
24,758.69
Treasurer,
City
of
La Verne
5,182.27
Treasurer,
City
of
Long Beach
285,299.19
Treasurer,
City
of
Los Alamitos
18,216.76
Treasurer,
City
of
Los Angeles
3,690,313.51
Treasurer,
City
of
Lynwood
135,751.76
Treasurer,
City
of
Manhattan Beach
91,385.53
Treasurer,
City
of
Maywood
21,850.00
Treasurer,
City
of
Norwalk
32,000.00
Treasurer,
City
of
Ojai
4,709.82
Treasurer,
City
of
Orange
62,962.04
•TAT[ OF CALIFORNIA
O[PARTM[NT OF PIJRLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DISTRICT•VII
MAILING ADDII[.f
SOX 2304. T[RMIMILL ANNKX
LOS ANGELES 54. CALIFORNIA
April 26, 1963
To: City Clerk
1Z0 f. f►wrM ff.l[*
LOf ANGtL=f Ii. CALIF.
►Men.i IiAIDUMN e-Soso
PLSAff S[FRR
TO FIL; Ma.
VII--Ora-1 itB
Attached is a tabulation showing the quarterly apportionment
of 5/8� gas tax funds to incorporated cities in District VII of
the Division of Highways -for the quarter ending March 31, 1963
These funds are made available to the cities for expenditure on major
city streets under provisions of Section 2107 of the Streets and
Highways Code.'
The apportionmeant to the City of Huntington Beach for
this quarterly period is $ 25,214.81 based on the official popu-
lation of 34,143 The payment being made to the'City for the
same quarterly period is $
Quarterly paymnts to each city frequently vary from the apportion-
ment for the same quarter as payments may be made to a city only to the
extent authorized in the city's approved budget proposal. Payments
ray exceed the quarterly apportionment where previously apportioned
but unbudgeted funds have accumulated to the credit of that city.
Payments may be less than the quarterly apportionment when the total
of the approved'budget is less than the funds.available or to become
available, or when a segment of the apportionment is to be withheld
for work by another agency on a cooperative basis.
The funds provided in this quarterly payment are to be used for
the purposes included in your approved budget proposal. If you have
budgeted for both construction and maintenance, you may divide this
particular payment in any ratio you'find convenient. You are reminded,
however, that you may not spend more than 40% of the fiscal year'B
allocation for maintenance nor more than the amounts -budgeted; nor can
you spend'more.for construction than the amount included in the approved
budget proposal without prior approval of the Department of Public Works.
Should you have any questions with respect to either the quarterly
apportionment or the.quarterly payment, please contact this office.
DZM/dc
Encl
Very truly yours,
A. C. BIRNIE
District Engineer
bn
By s M. . UWERS
Mstrict City do County
Projects Engineer
(3)
APRIL 1963 APPORTIONMENT OF GAS TAX
FUNDS FOR EXPENDITURE ON CITY STREETS
DISTRICT VII (Continued)
City PoRulation Amount
Los Angeles County (Cont'd)
Sierra Madre
10,250
$ 7,569.69
Signal Hill
4,627
30417.07
South E1 Monte
4,865
3,592.83
South Gate
53,831
39,754.52
South Pasadena
19,7o6
14,553.00
Temple City
37,758
27,884.51
Torrance
114,300
84,411.24
Vernon
229
169.12
Walnut
934
689.76
West Covina
56,000
41,356.34
Whittier
78,735
58,146.27
Totals
5,322,452
$3,930,663.03
Orange County
Anaheim
133,700
98,738.26
Brea
9,880
7296.44
Buena Park
52,4o0
38:697.72
Costa Mesa
50,700
37,442.26
Cypress
6,350
4,689.51
Dairyland
622
459.35
Fountain Valley
2,068
1,527.23
Fullerton_
64,loo
47,338.24
Garden Grove
100,300
74,072.16
/Huntington Beach
34,143
25,214.81
Laguna Beach
10,600
7,828.16
.La Habra
31,900
23,558.34
Los Alamitos
5,975
4,412.57
Newport Beach
31,40o
23,189.o9
Orange
360493
26,950.30
Placentia
6,975
5,151.08
San Clemente
10,500
7,754.31
San Juan Capistrano
1,848
1,364.76
TA1lLE t
A HIGHWAY -USER TAX PROGRAM PRODUCING EQUIVALENT OF I CENT Of GASOLINE TAX
A. TAX RATES
Present
Proposed
Increase
Gasoline tax-----------------
6.0¢
6.70
.70
Heseltax -------------------
7.0�
7.90
.8x
Plate fee---------------------
$3
$9
$1
11'ekht fees------------------
S114267
$124302
13%
B. ADDITIONAL REVENUES (MILLIONS)
First
Mrst
effective
five
Annual
1961-62*
Year"
3•ears**
average
(gasoline tax_________________
-,39,410
*42,490
S229,950
$15,990
DieseIta---------------------
Plate fees___________________
2,6220
8,910
2,830
9,700
15,310
62,.W
3,062
10,500
Weight fees------------------
53330
5,850
31,G50
6,330
S5G,290
160,870
$329,410
:65,882
Totals------------------
• Baerd on aclunl dnta for I961-62.
•� Dased on a full year of revenue ccllectlon; grogram would start during 1962-64 flecaI year.
TABLE 2
ESTIMATED APPORTIONMENTS FOR COUNTY ROADS AND CITY STREETS -PRESENT AND PROPOSED
(Based on 1961-62 Data)
I
County
Present
Proposed
Gain
Alameda__________________________
$6 517 661
$9 732 902
$3 215 241
Alpine____________________________
77,071
81,135
4,064
Amador___________________________
222,760
270,811
48,051
Butte_____________________________
907,572
1,259,589
352,017
Calaveras__________________________
323,843
384,496
60,653
Colusa____________________________
393,202
471,063
77,861
Contra Costa _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
2,702,325
4,147,244
12444,919
Del Norte_________________________
196,963
246,798
49,835
El Dorado_________________________
548,640
697,133
148,493
Fresno____________________________
3,124,588
4,229,079
1,104,491
Glenn_____________________________
474,380
574,863
100,483
Humboldt_________________________
926,444
1,228,063
301,619
Imperial___________________________
1,375,386
1,672,314
296,928
Inyo______________________________
557,548
645,164
87,616
Kern______________________________
2,360,712
3,275,811
915,099
Kings_____________________________
649,331
847,222
197,891
Lake______________________________
308,451
389,665
81,214
Lassen____________________________
558,778
645,200
86,422
Los Angeles_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
44,441,777
67,551,395
23,109,618
Madera___________________________
765,700
940,920
175,220
Marin_____________________________
1,032,709
1,532,139
499,430
Mariposa__________________________
267,144
306,550
39,406
Mendocino_________________________
592,974
787,350
194,376
Merced____________________________
1,160,841
1,499,271
338,430
Modoc____________________________
457,202
521,262
64,060
Mono_____________________________
407,843
447,563
39,720
Monterey__________________________
1,358,439
1,828,712
470,273
Napa_____________________________
465,489
671,066
205,577
Nevada___________________________
347,148
437,316
90,168
Orange____________________________
5,720,315
8,470,181
2,749,866
Placer_____________________________
675,212
892,170
216,958
Plumas____________________________
395,457
457,491
62,034
Riverside__________________________
2,609,219
3,404,934
795,715
Sacramento_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3,226,586
5,249,929
2,023,343
San Benito________________________
277,069
344,360
67,291
San Bernardino _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4,132,485
5,428,115
1,295,630
San Diego_________________________
6,994,103
10,474,181
3,480,078
San Francisco______________________
5,075,155
7,314,307
2,239,152
San Joaquin_______________________
1,714,711
2,627,650
912,939
San Luis Obispo____________________
920,653
1,232,074
311,421
San Mateo _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
3,297,380
4,907,395
1,610,015
Santa Barbara _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1,314,758
1,995,950
681,192
Santa Clara_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
4,870,967
7,346,765
2,475,798
Santa Cruz________________________
725,864
1,082,755
356,891
Shasta____________________________
773,540
1,042,225
268,685
Sierra_____________________________
228,090
250,872
22,782
1 Siskiyou___________________________
830,459
1,004,361
173,902
Solano____________________________
957,721
1,393,270
435,549
Sonoma___________________________
1,317,794
1,690,161
372,367
Stanislaus _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1,399,787
1,870,088
470,301
Sutter_____________________________
497,084
643,635
146,551
Tehama___________________________
556,697
683,429
126,732
Trinity____________________________
406,060
462,070
56,010
Tulare____________________________
1,929,910
2,568,117
638,207
Tuolumne_________________________
269,521
340,101
70,580
Ventura___________________________
1,376,586
2,099,696
723,110
Yolo______________________________
638,021
868,245
230,224
Yuba ____________________________
367,118
487,153
120,035
Total _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
$127,021,243
$183,953,776
$56,932,533
} s
TABLE 3
ESTIMATED APPORTIONMENTS FOR CITY STREETS -PRESENT AND PROPOSED
(Based on 1961-62 Data For All Cries in Each County)
Cities in County
Present
Proposed
Gain
AILmeda--------------------------
$2,484,2G7
$5,220,450
S2,736,183
Alpine----------------------------
-----
Ariador---------------------------
19,$42
89
5 217,
Butte-----------------------------
85,525
167,065
81,&10
Cclavemg--------------------------
4,379
6,G90
2,311
Q,lusa----------------------------
16,734
31,344
7,610
Contra Costa______________________
762,815
1,3.19,181
5S(1,3G9
Del forte-------------------------
9,916
20,246
10,330
El Dorado-------------------------
13,3S0
26,408
12,02S
'resno____________________________
607,211
1,000,942
393,731
Glenn_____________________________
22,114
35,787
13,673
Humboldt-------------------------
131,936
26I,930
M,004
Imperial---------------------------
160,631
237,762
77,12S
Ingo------------------------------
9,G6G
16,626
G,9G0
K,--m ------------------------------
313,9.15
48S,698
17.1,753
Iiings_____________________________
60,63G
100,183
39,547
IAAe------------------------------
7,912
14,271
6,3`)9
L'Lsgen----------------------------
18,874
31,G51
12,777
Los Angeles________________________
15,865,463
34,4$0,011
15,611,5-15
"Madera. - - ------------------------
61,136
86,792
2;i,656
:tlarin-----------------------------
302,303
613,O=S
310,745
'Alsriposa--------------------------
------
------
------
111 endocino------------------------
G0,279
119,82:
59,�13
Alerced----------------------------
13.1,7a1
2-12,517
107,843
A1odoc----------------------------
9,497
14,2G6
4,769
11'lono----------------------------
------
------
------
Monterey--------------------------
323,139
593,514
271,405
Napa_____________________________
87,036
18.1,855
97,819
Nevada---------------------------
23,700
43,295
19,505
O.ange----------------------------
2,112,665
4,309,SS-1
2,197,219
Placer-----------------------------
84,339
145,554
G1,215
Plunms----------------------------
6,&19
7,039
1,290
II'verside--------------------------
537,25S
1,100,593
569,337
S:teramcnto------------------------
671,781
1,533,352
SG1,571
Sven Benito________________________
2.1,453
38,704
14,311
SAn Bernardino____________________
877,030
1,591,598
717,5GS
S:ln Diego-------------------------
2,55303
5,I1.1,273
2,5G1,190
S.,n Francisco______________________
2,251,528
2,251,528
-___--
S,Ln Joaquin_______________________
417,402
83G,816
419,414
San Luis Obispo____________________
129,371
233,451
10.1,OS0
S_in -'%Iateo-------------------------
1,215,12S
2,483,427
1,2GS,299
Santa Barbara_____________________
321,780
621,659
296,879
s,inta Clara________________________
1,662,017
3,577,733
1,914,8I6
S.Lnta Cruz________________________
133,315
292,58-1
159,269
Shasta----------------------------
56,012
110,626
54,5S4
Sierra-----------------------------
3,821
4,470
649
---------------------------
63,372
102,141
3S1769
2lano----------------------------
328,635
503,236
2(A,G01
S��no�n---------------------------
189,161
430,2SG
211,122
star_islaus-------------------------
205,343
417,409
212,066
Stitter-----------------------------
4S,087
87,096
29,009
1'ehama---------------------------
36,0115
63,163
27,115
1'rinity----------------------------
------
------
------
Tulare----------------------------
19G,4GG
360,023
1G3,557
Tuolumne_________________ ___ ___
9,9.16
19,101
9,158
Ventura---------------------------
332,632
523,210
190,578
Tolo------------------------------
81,115
145,207
6-1,092
Tuba-----------------------------
3-1,246
81,872
47.626
Total ------------------------- 1 $36,180,776 1 $72,517,50G 1 $36,330,739
ESTIMATED APPORTIONMENTS FOR COUNTY ROADS -PRESENT AND PROPOSED
WI*j on 1761 .6-1 Data) -
Proposed
Formula
New
County
Present
Revision
Funds
Total
Gain
Alsmcda----------------------
tl,033,394
S4,223,223
$289,229
$1,512,452
10-179,0513
Xpine------------------------
77,071
70,310
1,825
81,13.5
4,OG4
A-nador----------------------
202,918
208,01
37,031
243,722
42,SO4
B.itte------------------------
822,0-17
800,543
291,031
1,092,524
270,477
Calaveras---------------------
319,464
333,246
44,560
377,800
58,342
Colusti-----------------------
376,468
392,359
5-1,360
446,719
70,251
Contra Costa------------------
1,939,510
1,995,f)15
802,145
2,798,060
M,550
Del Norte--------------------
187,047
167,739
58,813
226,552
39,505
El Dorado--------------------
534,260
541,574
129,15I
G70,725
136,465
Fresno-----------------------
2,517,377
2,240,941
9S7,296
3,228,137
710,760
Glenn------------------------
452,266
469,073
70,003
539,076
SG,810
Humboldt____________________
791,509
699,076
267,057
966,133
171,625
Imperial----------------------
1,214,752
1,25S,136
176,416
1,43.1,552
219,800
Inyo-------------------------
517,882
578,309
50,229
628,538
80,656
Fern-------------------------
2,046,767
1,855,S36
931,277
2,787,113
740,316
Rings ------------------------
588,695
591,4r,8
155,361
747,039
158,341
]take-------------------------
300,509
30G,2S9
69,105
375,394
74,833
Lassen --------- -------------
539,90I
568,332
45,167
613,549
73,645
Los Angeles-------------------
23,576,314
30,03,9,712
3,012,672
33,071,38.1
4,495,070
Dladcra----------------------
701,5G1
727,313
126,785
85 ,123
149,561
Marin------------------------
730,406
730,4S7
188,604
fl19,09I
ISS,685
Pfariposa.---------------------
267,14-1
282,768
23,782
306,550
39,406
Mendocino--------------------
532,695
529,617
137,881
667,529
134,833
?.ferced-----------------------
1,026,137
1,03.1,778
220,9-IG
1,256,724
230,587
Modoe-----------------------
447,705
47.1,331
32,665
506,93G
59,291
Mono-----------------------
407,843
433,59G
13,067
4.17,563
39,720
?Monterey---------------------
1,033,300
889,2SO
339,988
1,229,169
195,868
Napa-------------------------
378,453
351,625
131,59G
4S6,211
107,753
Nevada-----------------------
323,353
32,307
70,714
30-1,021
70,6G3
Orange-----------------------
3,607,650
3,7aa,3I0
459,957
4,160?97
552,647
]'lacer------------------------
590,873
5S1,277
165,339
740,616
155,743
Plurnss_______________________
38,S,S03
400,070
49,482
449,552
60,744
]tiverside---------------------
2,071,061
1,715,405
582,931
2,298,339
226,378
Sacramento___________________
2,55-I,S05
2,606,911
110-19,633
3,716,577
1,161,772
San Benito--------------------
252,616
257,056
4S,5.10
303,596
52,9SO
Fan Bernardino----------------
3,255,455
2,760,299
1,073,218
3,933,517
578,062
Ban Die-o--------------------
4,411,020
4,610,744
740,164
5,359,908
918,358
San Tranciseo-----------------
2,823,627
2,930,502
2,112,277
5,062,779
2,239,152
San Joaquin-------------------
1,207,309
1,20.1,891
498,943
1,790,834
493,525
San Luis Obispo---------------
791,282
775,613
223,010
998,623
207,341
San Mateo--------------------
2,OS2,252
2,152,508
271,460
2,423,963
3.11,716
Santa Barbara-----------------
089,078
994,907
379,3E 1
1,374,291
384,313
Santa Clara-------------------
3,208,050
3,309,030
460,002
3,769,032
560,9S2
Santa Cruz-------------------
59'2,&19
5,%5,230
201,011
790,171
197,622
Shasta------------------------
717,498
709,109
2' 2',490
931,599
214,101
Sierra------------------------
224,269
236,796
9,606
2-16,402
22,133
Siskiyou----------------------
767,037
791,128
111,092
902,220
135,133
Solano------------------------
629,OS6
626,627
173,407
S00,034
170,948
Sonoma----------------------
1,128,00
901,489
358,3S6
1,259,875
131,245
Stanislaus---------------------
1,19.1,41.1
1,011,511
411,103
1,4222,679
228,235
Sutter------------------------
448,997
4.i1,2`'23
115,316
566,539
117,542
Tehama----------------------
520,652
537,281
82pD82
620,266
99,614
Trinity-----------------------
406,OGO
4V,593
3.1,477
462,070
56,010
Tulare------------------------
1,733,444
1,732,507
475,587
2,208,09-1
474,650
Tuolumne--------------------
259,575
202,963
58,031
320,997
61,422
Ventura----------------------
1,613,954
1,052,486
524,000
1,576,4SG
532,532
Yolo-------------------------
556,90G
511,397
20S,611
723,038
166,132
Yuba------------------------
332,872
311,017
93,364
405,281
72,409
Totals--------------------
$90,834,07
$91,475,000
S19,961,270
2111,436,270
$20,601,803
YABLI S
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF "NEW" MONEY FOR COUNTIES AND CITIES
(Based an 1961.62 Data)
County
Total
A.V.
(11000)
Outside
A.V.
(11000)
Outside
Percent
Base
Amount
County
Share
City
Share
Alameda-------------------
$1,495,255
$142,9G3
9.56
$3,025,412
$2S9,229
$2,736,153
Alpine_____________________
2,3G3
2,3G3
100.00
1,825
1,825
----
Amador------------------ --
45,267
39,619
87.59
42,273
37,031
5,247
Butte______________________
168,520
131,745
78.17
373,521
291,981
81,540
Calaveras---------- _-------
29,132
27,697
95.07
46,871
41,5GO
2,311
Colusa---------------------
50,204
44,037
87.72
61,070
54,360
7,610
Contra Costa---------------
918,308
530,543
67.77
1,388514
802145
5SG,369
Del torte__________________
28,771
24,473
8:5.06
69,143
59,813
10,330
El Dorado------------------
93,882
85,886
01.48
141,179
129,151
12,025
Fresno---------------------
818,69.1
585,262
71.49
1,3S1,027
9S7,20G
393,731
Glenn----------------------
56,231
47,0M
83.60
93,670
70,003
13,673
Humboldt__________________
172,882
116,2S9
67.2G
397,051
267,057
129,094
Imperial___________________
133,469
92,867
69.5S
253,54-1
176,416
77,128
Inyo_______________________
43,143
37,89.1
87.83
57,189
50,229
6,9GO
Kern______________________
74.1,919
627,239
84.20
1,106,030
031,277
174,753
I{ings______________________
133,05G
10G,037
79.71
19-1,008
155,361
39,547
Lake_______________________
39,863
36,518
91.61
75,434
69,105
6,3-9
Lassen_____________________
23,8-17
18,5S9
77.95
57,9-14
45,167
12,777
Los Angeles_ _ _ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
12,374,474
1,723,263
13.93
2I,627,220
3,012,672
18,614,548
.Madera --------------------
10s,G39
90,355
83.17
152,4-11
126,785
25,656
.Maria ------------- _-------
2G8,3G7
101,373
37.77
499,349
188,60.1
310,745
:Mariposa-------------------
13,G-19
13,G19
100.00
23,782
23,782
----
Afendocino----------------
87,78.1
61,310
69.84
107,424
137,881
59,513
AMerced____________________
161,675
108,653
67.20
328,789
220,91G
107,&13
AMocioc_____________________
26,879
23,45-1
87.26
37,434
32,665
4,769
Afono------- _--------------
25,OG6
25,066
100.00
13,967
13,967
__-_
Monterey__________________
384,9SO
213,018
55.33
614,293
339,858
274,40a
Napa----------------------
94,222
5-1,mt
57.01
232,405
131,586
97,819
Nevada____________________
44,232
3-1,660
78.38
90,219
70,714
19,505
Orange---------------------
1,466,944
253,9-12
17.31
2,637,176
459,957
2,197,219
Placer---------------------
131,209
95,755
72.98
226,554
165,339
61215
Plumas------------ --------
75,521
73,600
97.46
50,772
49,482
1?90
f:iverside___________________
652,770
330,205
50.59
1,152,271
582,93.1
569,337
Sacramento-----------------
83-1,889
458,490
54.92
1911 201
1010 633
861,571
San Benito_________________
47,755
30,893
77.23
62,851
4S,540
14,311
San Bernardino_____________
037,233
561,692
59.93
1,790,786
1,073,218
717,5GS
San Diego------------------
1,60,495
372,881
22.42
3,301,3.54
740,1G1
2,561,1J0
San Francisco---------------
1,482,218
- ._
_-__
2,112,277
2,112,277
-_
San Joaquin________________
451,591
2.15,3-1
54.33
918,337
498,943
419,414
San Luis Obispo-------------
171,249
116,768
68.18
327,090
223,010
la1,080
San Mateo-----------------
887,678
156,49.1
17.63
1,539,759
271,460
1,26S,299
Santa Barbara______________
390,493
219,073
56.10
676,2G3
379,384
296,879
Santa Clara________________
1,416,867
274,42-1
19.37
2,374,818
4G0,002
1,914,S1G
Santa Cruz_________________
171,482
96,500
5G.27
3G4,210
204,941
159,269
Shasta_____________________
148,359
119,13G
80.30
277,074
222,490
54,584
Sierra----------------------
6,&36
6,403
93.67
10,235
9,606
6.19
Siskiyou____________________
61,878
48,091
74.13
149,801
111,002
3817G9
Solano---------------------
184,001
72,888
39.59
438,OOS
173,407
2fr1,601
Sonoma--------------------
267,951
160,190
59.78
599,505
35S,386
241,122
Stanislaus__________________
246,973
155,448
62.9.1
653,174
411,108
242,066
Sutter_____________________
96,90,1
77,422
79.90
144,325
115,31G
29,009
Tehama---------- _---------
58,2GO
43,910
75.37
110,100
82,9S2
27,118
Trinity_____________________
14,711
14,711
100.00
34,477
34,477
----
Tulare ---------------------
336,541
250,406
74.41
639,14-1
475,587
163,557
Tuolumne__________________
40 24.1
3-1,759
8G.37
67,192
58,034
9,158
Ventura____________________
508,267
372,711
73.33
714,578
524,000
190,578
Yalo------- ----------------
142,410
103,9&1
76.50
272,733
208,6.11
6-1,092
Yuba----------------------
64,012
42,300
66.22
140,990
93,3&1
47,62G
Total------------------
$31,549,630
S9,945,962
__--
S56,292,000
S19,901,270
$36,330,730
TABLE 6
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF "OLD" MONEY AMONG COUNTIES -REVISED FORMULA
{Bawd an 1961-62 Data)
County
Eng.
Snow
and Storm
Basic
Grant
Equal.
Grant
Balance
Total
Alameda-------------------
520,004
$13,145
S3,687,2-12
_
1
$5022832
$1,223,223
Alpine---------------------
20,%11
1 8,009
2,22-1
$18,680
303
70,310
Ainador____________________
20,004
1,732
51,527
128,401
7,027
208,691
Butte______________________
20,004
9,331
455,231
253,897
62,080
800,543
Cz.laveras------------------
20,00-1
8,092
57,121
210,236
7,790
333,246
Colusa---------------------
20,004
1,695
75,527
284,833
10,300
392,359
Contra Cost<a_______________
20,004
52,875
1,692,261
____
230,775
1,995,915
Dcl Norte__________________
20,004
3,187
84,268
48,788
11,492
167,739
El Dorado__________________
20,00-1
35,434
172,OG3
290,G09
23,464
641,574
Fresno_____________________
20,001
11,091
1,683,130
297,OSO
229,530
2,240,841
Glenn----------------------
Humboldt------------------
20,004
20,004
6,=
35,497
101,980
483,903
320,92.1
93,67G
13,907
65,991
469,073
699,076
Imperial___________________
20,001
_.__
309,0(Y8
SS6,984
42,140
1,258,136
Inyo_______________________
20,004
12,040
69,699
467,061
9,505
578,309
KPM ----------------------
20,001
9,471
1,347,981
29.1,555
183,825
1,855,836
13ngs______________________
20,004
____
237,545
301,735
32,394
591,678
Lake_______________________
20,0G1
2,093
01,935
179,720
12,537
306,289
Lassen---------------------
20,004
37,2G8
70,619
430,861
9,G30
568,3S2
Us Angelcg________________
20,OG1
85,888
-26,358,318
____
3,594,502
30,058,712
Madera--------------------
20,001
5,131
185,788
491,084
25,336
727,343
Marin------------- _-------
20,00-1
18,005
G08,5S5
____
82,093
730,487
Alariposa-------------------
20,004
2,779
28,084
227,048
3,953
2S:,768
Alondocino_________________
20,00-1
12,142
2.10,612
224,076
32,813
529,617
Muced--- _----------------
20,0G1
____
400,714
560,414
54,646
1,035,778
Modoc_____________________
20,004
16,651
45,623
385,801
6,222
474,331
Mono______________________
20,00-1
49,903
17,022
344,34G
2,321
433,596
Monterey------------------
20,001
18,505
748,674
__--
102,097
SS9,280
Napa -------------- .-------
20,00-1
9,750
2S3,2-15
__--
38,62G
351,625
NEvada------------ _-------
20,9G4
44,372
109,955
133,981
14,995
323,307
Orange---------------------
20,001
255
3,238,451
____
441,630
3,700,340
FL: ecr_____________________
20,004
62,459
276,114
185,04G
37,65-1
581,277
Plum s____________________
20,004
94,932
61,878
214,818
8,438
400,070
Riverside -------------------
20,004
12,050
1,401,339
87,501
191,511
1,715,405
Sacramento-----------------
20,004
_---
2,329,293
----
317,647
2,666,944
San Benito_________________
20,004
5,350
76,600
144,656
10,446
257,056
San Bernardino_____________
20,004
67,813
2,182,533
192,315
297,634
2,760,299
San Diego------------------
20,004
27,499
4,023,547
----
548,694
4,619,744
8aui Francisco_______________
20,00.1
5,OSO
2,674,352
----
351,066
2,930,502
San Joaquin----------------
20,004
____
1,119,234
___-
152,633
1,291,691
San Luis Obispo -------------
20,00-1
28,010
398,644
273,602
5.1,30
775,613
San Mateo_________________
20,004
___-
1,876,592
_._.
255,912
2,152,508
Santa Barbara--------------
20,004
38,305
824,201
____
112,397
994,907
Santa Clara----------------
20,001
----
2,894,=
----
39.1,701
3,309,030
Santa Cruz-----------------
20,001
60,810
443,883
----
60,533
585,230
Sl ista---------------------
20,00-1
30,695
337,685
274,675
46,050
709,109
Sierra______________________
20,%1
29,616
12,498
172,974
1,704
236,796
Sis':iyou--------------------
20,004
59,265
182,645
%1,307
24,907
791,128
Solano_____________________
20,004
____
533,825
----
72,798
626,627
Sonoma____________________
20,OG4
5I,190
730,655
_ _
99,640
901,489
Stanislaus__________________
20,001
__..
796,060
86,948
108,559
1,011,571
Sutter---------------------
20,0G1
-___
175,897
231,335
23,987
451,223
Tehama--------------------
20,00.1
525
134,185
364,271
18,299
537,284
Trinity_____________________
20,00-1
40,995
42,019
318,845
5,730
427,593
Tulare_____________________
20,004
1,036
778,061
826,279
106,227
1,732,507
Tu3lumne------------------
20,00-1
17,501
81,991
132,309
11,168
262,963
Ventura____________________
20,004
42,820
870,897
____
118,765
1,052,486
Yo'.o-----------------------
20,004
____
332,395
116,669
45,329
514,397
Yuba----------------------
20,0G4
11,440
171,833
83,207
23,433
311,917
Totals-----------------
$1,160,232
1 $1,200,000
S68,60G,250
$11,152,637
$9,355,831
$91,475,000
TABU 7
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF STREET FUNDS AMONG CITIES -"OLD" AND "NEW" MONEY
County and City
"Old" Money
"New" Money
Total
Alameda:
Alameda------------------------
$199,977
$216,513
$116,490
Albany--------------------------
47,623
50,196
07,819
Berkeley________________________
3.15,39.1
377,276
72:,670
Emeryville----------------------
9,096
9,107
18,203
Tremont_________________________
166,026
105,301
361,330
Hayward ------------------------
226,639
2-16,5a1
473,143
Livermore- - -- --- ----------------
52,630
5.1,753
107,413
tenark-------------------------
40,52E
42,214
82,742
Oakland-------------------------
1,117,897
1,2-16,244
2,3GI,141
Piedmont________________________
36,510
37,694
74,204
Pleasanton_______________________
13,669
14,251
27,920
San Leandro_____________________
206,3`.J
223,657
4`NJ,936
Union City----------------------
21,949
22,440
44,3S9
Total _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ -_ _ _
$2,48-1,267
$2,736,183
$5,220,450
Alpine:----------------------------
------
------
------
Amador:
Amador------------------------
$1,609
$202
S1,811
lone -------------------------- --
4,677
1,542
6,219
Jackson_________________________
6,582
1,853
8,435
Plymouth-----------------------
2,474
489
2,963
Sutter Creek---------------------
4,500
1,161
5,661
Total-----------------------
$19,842
$5,217
S25,09
Butte:
Biggs___________________________
$3,505
$2,596
$6,101
Chico---------------------------
48,132
46,933
93,065
Gridley__________________________
11,077
10,443
21,520
Oroville_________________________
22,811
21,5GS
44,379
Total-----------------------
$85,525
$81,540
$167,065
Calaveras:
Angels--------------------------
S1,379
$2,311
$6,690
Colusa :
Colusz--------------------------
Williams------------------------
$11,60-1
5,130
$5,477
2,133
$17,0S1
7,263
Total-----------------------
$16,73-1
$7,610
$2-1,344
Contra Costa:
Antioch-------------------------
$56,653
$40,324
$96,077
Brentwood_______________________
7,5S9
4,999
12,58S
Concord_________________________
133,627
107,671
2.11,29S
Ll Cerrito-----------------------
82,675
5S,174
140,8-19
Hercules_________________________
1,03-1
709
2,G13
Martinez------------------------
30,949
21,9G1
52,913
Pinole---------------------------
22,591
16,180
38,771
Pittsburg------------------------
61,459
43,594
105,053
Pleasant Hill---------------------
45,514
60,212
105,726
Riclunond_______________________
224,089
164,328
3S8,417
San Pablo_______________________
63,342
45,024
108,366
Walnut Creek____________________
32,393
23,100
55,583
$762,815
W- 6,3G9
$1,349,184
Total_______________________
Del Norte:
Crescent City--------------------
19,916
$10,330
$20,246
El Dorado:
Placerville_______________________
$1-1,350
$12,028
$26,408
TABLE 7-Coatinved
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF STREET FUNDS AMONG CITIES -"OLD" AND "NEW" MONEY
County and City
"Old" Bfoney
"New" Money
Total
Fresno:
Clovis--------------------------
$25,332
$15,586
$40,918
Coalinga------------------------
19,980
11,993
31,973
Firebau,gh-----------------------
7,240
4,16"
11,402
Fowler--------------------------
6,703
3,804
10,507
Fresno--------------------------
425,497
2&1,475
709,972
Iiuron ---------------------------
4,825
2,551
7,376
Berman-------------------------
6,939
3,961
10,899
Kingsburg-----------------------
10,323
6,219
16,542
Mendota________________________
9,5&1
6,20-1
15,788
Orange Cove---------------------
9,694
5,600
15,496
ParIier--------------------------
5,118
2,746
7,864
Peedley_________________________
22,039
13,366
35,405
Sanger --------------------------
27,3S3
17,15G
44,542
San Joaquin---------------------
3419
1,767
5,416
Selma---------------------------
22,901
13,941
36,842
Total-----------------------
$607,211
S393,731
$1,000,942
Glenn:
Orland--------------------------
SS,G33
$5,192
$13,930
Willows-------------------------
13,476
8,481
21,937
Total-----------------------
522,111E
$13,673
$35,787
Humboldt:
Arcata-------------------------
$17,780
$17,103
$34,8S3
Blue Lake-----------------------
4,720
4,032
8,752
Eureka--------------------------
90,813
91,026
182,739
Ferndale------------------------
5,13.3
4,479
9,612
Fortuna -----------------------
11,619
11,510
23,129
Trinidad------------------------
1,871
044
2,815
Total-----------------------
$131,9303
$129,09.1
$261,930
Imperial:
Brawley-------------------------
$42,033
$21,310
S63,363
Calesico-------------------------
2G,090
12,384
38,474
Calipatria-----------------------
8,631
3,948
12,629
El Centro-----------------------
59,282
23,419
87,701
11oltville------------------------
10,28.1
4,772
15,056
Imperial-------------------------
9,012
4,119
13,131
Westmorland --------------------
5,23'-2
2,176
7,408
Total-----------------------
$160,63.1
$77,128
3237,762
Inyo:
Bishop--------------------------
$9,666
$6,060
$16,626
Kern:
-
Arvin---------------------------
$18,303
$9,719
S'28,117
Bakersfield----------------------
180,322
102,518
2S2,840
DeIano--------------------------
38,9W
21,28-1:
60,103
Maricopa------------------------
2,953
1,158
4,111
McFarland----------------------
12,111
6,585
18,696
Shafter__________________________
14,793
8,175
22,968
Taft__________________________--
12,521
6,829
19,350
Tehachapi-----------------------
10,528
5,647
16,175
Wasco__________________________
23,410
12,838
36,248
$313,913
$174,753
5.188,698
Tot.al-----------------------
Kings:
Corcoran------------------------
$17,270
$10,393
$27,663
Hanford-------------------------
34,645
23,9W
58,546
Lemoore-------------------------
8,720
5,25-1
13,974
Total----------------------
SG0,635
$39,547
$100,193
TABLE 7-Conl;nved
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF STREET FUNDS AMONG CITIES -"OLD" AND "NEW" MONEY
I
County and City
Lake:
Lakeport------------------------
Lassen:
Su.&-invflle -----------------------
Los Angeles: ---------------
(Detail--Tal,le 8)
Madera:
r ChowehiIla----------------------
Madera-------------------------
Total -----------------------
Marin:
Belvedere_ ---------------------
Corte Madera --------------------
Fairfax--------------------------
Larkspur------------------------
Mill Valley -------- --------------
Aovato--------------------------
Ross-------------- --------------
San Anselmo ---------------------
San Rafael -----------------------
Sausalito________________________
Total-----------------------
Mariposa:-------------------------
Mendocino:
Fort Bragg ----------------------
Point Arena ---------------------
Ukiah---------------------------
lvillits--------------------------
Total-----------------------
Merced :
Atwater -------------------------
Dos Palos_______________________
Gustine-------------------------
Livingston_______________________
I.os Banos -----------------------
Merced--------------------------
Total-----------------------
Modoc:
Alturas--------------------------
Mono:----------------------------
Monterey:
Carmel --------------------------
Del Rey Oaks --------------------
Gonzales------------------------
Greenfield-----------------------
King----------------------------
Monterey ------------------------
Pacific Grove --------------------
Salinas- ------------------------
Sand City-----------------------
Seaside --------------------------
Soledad-------------------------
"Old" ]Honey ' "New" Money
$7,942
$18,874
$15,865,4G3
S14,6-10
46,496
$61,136
$7,475
20,973
19,522
19,840
3.1,382
66,190
8,6S9
37,918
69,245
18,069
$302,303
$14,362
2,797
31,8-11
11,279
SG0,279
$21,059
7,113
7,033
8,194
19,897
67,508
$13-1,7&1
S9,497
$14,805
6,519
7,4-15
6,064
9,853
73,177
39,53E
93,285
2,567
62,33E
9,552
$G,329
*12,777
$18,614,548
$6,125
19,531
$25,656
$7,019
20,910
18,99"
21,481
3.1,014
66,322
8,334
37,84E
78,411
17,417
S-310,745
$14,393
I,935
32,143
1I,072
$39, 43
$19,143
5,305
6,017
G;109
16,16E
54,803
$107,843
$1, 769
$12,622
5,G16
5,892
4,630
8,09-1
62,332
33,403
79,801
1,433
53,343
7,818
Total
$14,271
$3I,651
$3-1,4S0,011
;20, 7 G5
GG,027
SS6, 7 92
$14,493
41,SS3
38,514
41,321
G8,39G
132,512
17,023
75,764
147,G36
35,486
$613,0 5
528,755
4,732
G3,984
22,351
SI19,822
$43,202
12,418
13,950
14,603
36,063
122,311
$242,547
S14,2GG
S27,427
11,565
13,337
10,69-1
17,947
135,509
72,939
173,086
4,000
115,670
17,370
Total-----------------------
t325,139
$274,405
S599,&I.1
TAKI 7-Continued
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF STREET FUNDS AMONG CITIES -"OLD" AND "NEW" MONEY
County and City
"Old" Monty
"New" 1lfoney
Total
Napa:
Calistoga-----------------------
$5,56-1
55,483
$11,047
Napa- --------------------------
72,267
82,479
154,746
St. Helena_______________________
9,205
9,857
19,062
Total-----------------------
S57,036
$97,819
$184,855
Nevada:
Grass Valley---------------------
$15,698
$13,156
$28,854
Nevada City---------------------
8,092
61349
14,441
Total-----------------------
$23,790
$191505
$13,295
Orange:
Anaheim ------------------------
$3&1,840
1391,533
$756,378
Brea_ --------------------
27,582
26,841
54,423
Buena Park______________________
145,866
146,751
292,617
Costa Mesa______________________
138,327
138,841
277,168
Cypress-------------------------
9,807
12,967
22,774
Dairyland-----------------------
2,875
1,967
4,842
Fountain Valley__________________
7,231
6,540
13,774
Fullerton------------------------
183,978
187,546
371,524
Garden Grove____________________
279,821
305,197
585,018
Huntington Beach________________
51,777
50,128
101,905
Laguna Beach___________________
31,065
31,627
62,692
I.a Habra------------------------
89,497
95,354
184,851
Los Alamitos---------------------
13,998
13,637
27,635
Newport Beach------------------
92,558
92,952
185,540
Orange--------------------------
100,347
98,991
199,338
Placentia________________________
20,843
20,273
41,116
San Clemente____________________
29,238
30,203
59,441
San Juan Capistrano--------------
6,570
5,845
12,415
Santa Ana-----------------------
345,307
360,227
705,534
Seal Beach_______________________
23,082
22,120
45,202
Stanton-------------------------
36,649
35,305
71,954
Tustin- -------------------------
7,372
6,686
14,058
Villa Park_______________________
1,994
4,327
6,321
Westminster_____________________
102,038
111,326
213,364
$2,112,665
$2,197,219
$4,309,884
Total-----------------------
Placer:
Auburn-------------------------
$18,838
$13,130
$31,M
Colfax--------------------------
3,758
2,151
5,909
Lincoln_________________________
10,637
7,515
18,152
R.ocklin-------------------------
5,50G
3,514
9,020
Roses Ale------------------------
45,600
34,905
80,505
Total-----------------------
$84,339
161,215
1145,554
Plumas:
Portola--------------------------
$6,649
$1,290
$7,039
Riverside:
Banning-------------------------
$35,554
$35,797
$71,351
Beaumont-----------------------
14,141
14,690
28,831
Blythe--------------------------
20,155
19,063
40,118
Cabazon------------------------
2,501
1,651
4,152
Coachella------------------------
15,631
16,089
31,720
Corona--------------------------
43,199
44,202
87,401
Elsinore-------------------------
8,331
8,061
16,392
Hemet_________________________
18,326
17,951
36,277
Indio---------------------------
33,595
33,G12
67,237
Palm Springs--------------------
43,597
44,610
88,237
Perris---------------------------
9,988
9,917
19,905
Riverside------------------------
283,544
314,272
597,816
San Jacinto______________________
8,696
8,462
17,158
Total ----------------------- I . 5537,258 1 $569,337 1 $1,106,595
TABU 7-Continued
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF STREET FUNDS AMONG CITIES"OLD" AND "NEW" MONEY
County and City
"Old" Aloney
"New" Money
Total
Sacramento:
Folsom --------------------------
$14,500
$19,301
$33,801
Galt----------------------------
6,G31
7,358
13,9S9
IsTeton__________________________
4,132
4,092
8,22-1
orth'Sacramento----------------
41,050
50,898
92,84E
Sacramento______________________
GO-1,568
779,922
1,38.1,490
Total_______________________
$G71,781
SSG1,571
$1,533,352
San Benito:
Hollister_________________________
$20,300
$12,20S
g2,508
San Juan Bautista________________
4,153
2,103
6,25G
Total-----------------------
:2-1,453
$14,311
4$48,764
San Bernardino:
Barstow_________________________
W 573
S31,828
571,401
Chino---------------------------
35,40G
29,008
G-I,414
Colton__________________________
G0,265
48,3�1.1
108,G09
Fontana-------------------------
47,69S
38,8A-
8G,548
Montelair_______________________
47,913
35,591
8G,5d-1
cedlcs_________________________
14,83G
11,88S
2G,721
Ontario--------------------------
147,327
121,G:"r1
26S,981
Redlands________________________
86,870
G9,486
156,356
Itialto___________________________
59,9G6
48,088
IOS,034
San Bernardino-------------------
285,105
23S,G0-1
523,799
Upland--------------------------
51,9S1
41,227
93,208
$S77,030
$717,568
$1,59-1,598
Total-----------------------
San Diego:
Carlsbad------------------------
$29,891
$28,505
e58,396
Chula Vista----------------------
13G,438
144,48.1
280,922
Coronado________________________
58,375
55,572
113,9-17
Del \far-------------------------
10,417
9,624
20,041
El Cajon________________________
119,3p
115,8S9
235,2S1
Escondido_ _________________
61,219
65,618
126,836
Imperial Beach___________________
57,5 33
54,753
112,326
La Afesa------------------------
99,440
95,49S
191,939
National City --------------------
105,3.12
101,530
206,872
Oceanside_______________________
81,388
77,01S
158,436
San Diego-----------------------
1,793,f&.1
1,812,669
3,60G,278
i
t Total-----------------------
$2,553,05.'1
$2,561,100
$5,11.1,273
San Francisco:--------------------
$2,251,528
------
$2,251,528
San Joaquin:
Escalon_________________________
S6,31i1
V),566
S11,SS0
Lodi_ _________________________
72,005
70,180
142,185
Manteca------------------------
27,619
29,519
57,168
Ripon___________________________
6,7(Y)
5,980
12,689
Stockton------------------------
267,G97
272,528
540,225
Tracy---------------------------
37,028
35,G•11
72,669
$117,4022
$419,41-1
>iS3G,$1G
Total-----------------------
San Luis Obispo:
Arroyo Grande-------------------
$10,9';'0
ss,616
S19,53G
El Paco de Robles________________
22,127
17,481
39,608
Grover City_____________________
19,10,3
14,857
33,9G3
Pismo Beach_____________________
6,311
4,613
10,924
San Luis Obispo__________________
70,907
58,513
129,420
Total-----------------------
$129,371
1 $10,1,080
$233,4:51
VA6lI 7-Coeiinved
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF STREET FUNDS AMONG CITIES --"OLD" AND "NEW" MONEY
County and City
"Old" Money
"New" Money
Total
San Mateo:
Atherton------------------------
$25,391
125,618
$51,009
Belmont-------------------------
52,217
52,713
101,930
Brisbane------------------------
7,718
14,750
22,468
Burlingame______________________
77,432
79,208
156,660
Colma--------------------------
2,507
1,648
4,I55
Daly City-----------------------
141,013
147,G05
2S8,618
Half Dioon Bay------------------
6,899
6,449
13,34E
Hillsborough---------------------
24,770
24,89.1
49,6G4
Menlo Park----------------------
87,952
89,59G
177,548
Millbrae_________________________
51,8-16
52,308
104,154
Pacifica-------------------------
71,5I9
76,2S9
I.17,808
Redwood City-------------------
145,532
152,5-I5
298,077
San Bruno-----------------------
93,60.1
05,775
189,379
San Carlos_______________________
71,562
75,135
1-16,697
San Mateo-----------------------
218,109
230,250
418,359
South San Francisco______________
124,817
129,899
254,716
Woodside.-----------------------
12,220
13,617
25,837
Total-----------------------
$1,215,128
S1,2G8,299
$2,433,427
Santa Barbara:
Guadalupe_______________________
$8,879
$7,370
$16,258
Lompoc-------------------------
51,219
46,575
97,79.1
Santa Barbara___________________
Santa Arma---------------------
190,572
71,110
17G,137
66,788
3G6,709
140,S98
$324,780
V29G,879
$621,659
Total -----------------------
Santa Clara:
Alviso_ _____________________
S-1,539
5-1,014
S3,553
Campbell________________________
40,679
42,739
83,418
Cupertino-----------------------
12,243
12,753
24,096
Gilroy___________________________
2.1,149
25,12.1
49,273
Los Altos ------------------------
63,370
67,343
130,713
Los Altos Hills-------------------
11,422
11,871
23,293
Los Gatos-----------------------
32,242
35,388
67,630
Milpitas-------------------------
28,462
34,36"
62,824
Monte Sereno--------------------
6,036
6,031
12,067
Morgan HiII_____________________
10,806
11,123
21,929
Mountain tiiew__________________
108,184
115,909
224,093
Palo Alto________________________
165,108
178,776
343,894
San Jose -------------------------
725,093
SS2,478
1,607,561
'Santa Clara----------------------
209,513
248,041
457,554
Saratoga------------------------
47,795
50,812
98,607
Sunnyvale_______________________
173,286
188,052
361,338
$1,662,917
$1,914,816
$3,577,733
Total-----------------------
Santa Cruz:
Capitola-------------------------
$7,002
$7,663
$14,960
Sants Cruz----------------------
93,154
90,649
182,803
Watson-dlle------------ ----------
43,069
51,752
0.1,821
$133,315
$159,269
M2,584
Total-----------------------
Shasta:
Anderson------------------------
$14,540
$14,202
W,742
Redding-------------------------
41,502
40,382
81,884
$56,0.12
S54,584
$110,626
Total-----------------------
Sierra:
Loyalton------------------------
$3,821
$649
$4,470
TABLE 7-Continued
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF STREET FUNDS AMONG CITIES -"OLD" AND "NEW" MONEY
County and City
Sisldyou :
Dorris---------------------------
Dunsmuir----------------------
Etna- -------------------------
Tort Jones ----------------------
Monta;ue------------- ----------'
Mt. Shasta -------------------
Tulelake-------------------------II
Weed--------------------------
Yreka---------------------------
Total-----------------------
. Solano:
Benecia-------------------------
Dixon---------------------------
Fairf---------------------------
1'airfield -------------------------
Rio Vista. ------------------------
Suisun--------------------------
`'acaville------------------------
`-allejo--------------------------
Total-----------------------
Sonc a:
Cloverdale -----------------------
Flealdsburg----------------------
Petaluma------------------------
Santa Rosa______________________
SebastopoI-----------------------
Sonoma-------------------------
Total-----------------------
Stanislaus :
Ceres- -------------------------
Modesto-------------------------
Newman------------------------
Oakdale-------------------------
Patterson------------------------
�. Riverbank-----------------------
Turlock-------------------------
Total-----------------------
Sutter:
Live Oak------------------------
Yuba City -----------------------
Total----------------------
Tehama:
Corning -------------------------
Red Bluff ------------------------
Tehama-------------------------
Total----------------------
Trinity: ---------------------_----
Tulare :
Dinuba--------------------------
Exeter_ ---------------------
Farmersville---------------------
Lindsay------------------------
Porterville-----------------------
"Old" Aloney ! "New""Money
'53,933
9,660
2,796
2,456
3,357
6,836
3,8G-1
15,125
15,3.45
$63,372
520,297
9,053
53,5S5
8,885
8,445
36,469
191,001
5328,635
:9,585
15,517
45,306
09,521
9,120
10,112
$189,16-1
$14,459
120,200
7,475
16,011
8,322
9,39E
29,478
5205,313
S7,SG1
40,226
,,48,OS7
$10,061
21,197
1,787
$3G,045
$20,581
13,853
10,170
18,2M
27,253
$2,091
6,175
1,281
1,03S
1,681
4,161
2,012
10,072
10,228
$3S,7G9
S 15,5G3
7,615
42,176
6,707
6,333
30,125
15G,082
S-2G4,G01
511,750
19,870
57,905
128,010
11,115
12,472
$2.11,122
:1 G,S9G
144,313
8,093
18,763
9,152
10,49S
34,3-19
$242,OG6
S4,2GG
2-1, 7 43
S29,009
S7,GGS
18,78.1
666
527,118
S1G,727
11,456
8,173
14,500
22,751
Total
$6,021
15,835
4,077
3,491
5,03S
10,997
51906
25,197
23,573
$10`',141
35,860
17,5GS
95,761
15,592
14,778
G6,5fm
3.17,033
$593,236
S21,333
35,3S7
103,211
227,53.1
20,235
22,5S4
S 130,^_S6
31,355
2G-1,513
15,5G8
31,776
17,474
19,896
63,827
S-117,409
$12,127
64,9G9
77,096
$17, 7 29
42,9S1
2,453
ea3,163
$37,308
25,309
1S,343
32,76E
50,001
TABLT r-Censieued
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF STREET FUNDS AMONG
CITIES -"OLD" AND "NEW" MONEY
County and City
"Old" Money
"Flew" Money
Total
Tulare:. -Continued
Tulare --- •----------------------
$45,176
$3S,035
:S3,211
Visalia--------------------------
52,259
44,863
97,127
Woodlake-----------------------
8,900
7,047
15,953
Total-----------------------
$196,466
$163,557
$360,023
Tuolumne:
Sonora--------------------------
59,946
S91158
$19,104
Ventura:
Fillmore-------------------------
Ojai- ------------------------
$15,493
14,549
2,770
8,205
S24,269
22,754
Oamsrd--------------------------
127,370
73,404
200,864
Port IIueneme-------------------
33,435
22,725
61,160
San Buenaventura----------------
93,758
53,141
146,690
Santa Paula---------------------
43,027
2-1,237
67,264
Tow -----------------------
$332,632
$190,578
f523,210
Yolo:
Davis---------------------------
no,086
$25,M
$56,014
Winters-------------------------
7,2G4
5,083
12,347
Woodland-----------------------
43,765
33,081
76,846
Total-----------------------
$81,115
564,092
$145,207
Yuba:
3farymille -----------------------
Wheatland-----------------------
$30,706
3,450
$43,891
3,735
$74,687
7,1SS
Total-----------------------
$34,2-16
$171626
$81,872
Total -All-------------------
$36,186,776
$36,330,730
$72,517,506
TABLE s
ESTIMATED DISTRIBUTION OF STREET FUNDS AMONG LOS ANGELES CITJES-"OLD" AND "NEW" MONEY
Los Angeles I "OId" Money I "New" Money I Total
Alhambra-------------------------
S172,704
$196,511
$369,235
Arcadia---------------------------
132,745
15.1,551
257,29G
Artesia----------------------------
32,122
33,831
67,95G
Avalon----------------------------
Azusa-----------------------------
5,630
68,890
5,508
11,13S
147,421
78,531
Baldwin Park______________________
110,518
132,49E
2-13,016
Bell-------------------------------
62,62S
69,745
132,373
Bell(tower-------------------------
144,3S3
10,62.1
309,007
Bell Gardens-----------------------
G4,750
99,150
1G3,900
Beverly Ilills_______________________
95,891
110,506
209,397
Bradbury-------------------------
2,80
2,216
5,079
Burbank--------------------------
279,253
323,2S5
602,538
Claremont_________________________
42,80G
49,306
fl2,112
Co:amerce-------------------------
30,S0`.3
31,263
65,065
Compton--------------------------
22.1,5Sf�
258,252
482,83E
Covina----------------------------
65,6G0
72,1G2
137,822
Cudahy---------------------------
36,76G
40,160
76,933
Culver City------------------------
IO2,0-I(.)
115,333
218 2S-3
Dairy VaIley-----------------------
11,57.E
12,579
2.1,153
Downey---------------------------
256,19-1
295,853
552,a17
Duarte____________________________
45,0S6
50,OGG
95,152
El Monte--------------------------
02,194
115,810
208,001
I:l Sehundo------------------------
45,SGO
50,OSS
06,8.1E
Gardena___________________________
114,313
128,SS7
2-13,230
Glendale__________________________
375,634
434,967
8I0,G01
Glendora--------------------------
72,822
80,02
153,50-1
Hawthorne------------------------
108,308
12-1,73I
233,039
Hermosa Beach--------------------
52,575
57,786
110,361
Hidden HiIls_______________________
3,481
5,927
9,40S
Huntington Park___________________
90,188
107,290
203,478
Industry ---------------------------
3,315
2,790
6,135
Inglewood-------------------------
235,3S0
271,093
506,473
Irwindale--------------------------
5,57{i
5,4-13
11,019
Lakewood-------------------------
209,S37
2-10,706
450,513
I.a Mirada________________________
72,GZkl
80,45E
153,13.1
La Puente_________________________
80,814
95,026
175,810
La Verne__________________________
21,611
23,36G
45,007
Lawnd:Ile--------- -----------------
70,531
77,957
14S,4SS
Long; Deach________________________
1,047,423
1,231,1.15
2,281,508
Los Angeles________________________
7,GG3,33!?
9,09.3,71G
16,756,035
Lynn-ood--------------------------
I01,29-1
113,3G-1
214,65S
Manhattan Beach__________________
10S,287
121,G83
2_'9,970
May.rood-------------------------
46,972
52,311;
99,283
Monro%ria--------------- -----____--
8� G.:1
', �
97,102
184,726
Montebello________________________
107,85.3
121,203
229,08G
Monterey Park_____________________
120,001
135,G22
255,626
Nonralk---------------------------
274,98.3
318,208
593,193
Palos Verdes Estates----------------
32,158
37,472
69,630
Paramount________________________
8S,13.3
97,712
185,84S
Pasadena--------------------------
360,88.3
417,422
778,301
Pico Rivera________________________
154,152
176,246
330,39S
Pomona---------------------------
209,931
240,917
450,7.8
Redondo Beach____________________
147,629
168,486
316,115
Rollin- Hills_______________________
6,016
5,967
11,9S3
Rolling Hills Estates________________
13,293
15,133
28,431
Rosemead-------------------------
50,£r19
55,493
106,144
San Dimas-------------------------
23,4S6
25,560
49,0IG
San Fernando ----------------------
52,509
57,703
110,217
San Gabriel________________________
73,005
80,901
153,906
San Marino________________________
4.1,169
48,97G
93,1.45
TABLE S-Continued
ESTIMATED DISTRIRUTION OF STREET FUNDS AMONG LOS ANGELES CITIES -"OLD" AND erNEW" MONEY
Los Angeles
"Old" Money
"New" Money
Total
Santa Fe Springs___________________
$53,2G0
158,600
$111,860
Santa Monica----------------------
258,437
298,521
556,05S
Fierra Madre-----------------------
32,113
30,755
68,SGS
Fignal Hill-------------------------
14,047
16,592
31,539
South El Monte--------------------
15,610
17,392
33,011
Routh Gate------------------------
169,7G2
193,032
3G2,794
South Pasadena____________________
63,400
70,60
134,063
Temple City-----------------------
119,813
135,306
255,200
Torrance--------------------------
32G,286
390,502
716,788
Vernon----------------------------
1,00
821
2,511
Walnut_ -----------------------
3,815
3,349
7,164
West Covina-----------------------
167,045
197,797
364,842
Whittier---------------------------
172,00
275,987
448,447
Total-----------------------
$15,865,463
118,614,548
$3.1,480,011
0
` 10d IN 6siti0RPIA ergs euwrttu &MCM
1r759-C 1-es im
1-11
V
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
S.
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS t110 SPRING
12QAL7
o.S AwaKL90E. n.CALIF.
DISTRICT VII Pmor1S� MA Pi.om 4-I518
MAILING ADDRESS
BOX 1304. TFRMIAAL ANNEX
LOS ANGELES 54. CALIFORNIA
PLEAS[ REPIEII
March 10, 1961 TO IILs No.
Mr.' -James Wheeler
City Engineer
P0Box 190
Huntington Beach, Calif
Dear Sir:
Enclosed is completely executed copy
of the master agreement covering the budgeting
and expenditure of funds (5/8�) allocated from
the State Highway Fund to Cities.
This executed copy of the agreement
Is for your files.
Very truly yours,
A. L. HIMELHOCH
District Engineer
By �t
M. ERS
Distric City and County
Projects Engineer
Enc
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
S. ;z (01
t
MASTER AGREEMENT
FOR THE BUDGETING AND EXPENDITURE
OF FUNDS
ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES
�..w
MASTER AGREEMENT
FOR THE BUDGETING AND EXPENDITURE
OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES
This agreement entered into by and between the City of
llunt�ton Beach , hereinafter referred to
as the city, and the State Department of Public Works,
Division of Highways, hereinafter referred to as the
department,
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Sections 194 and 2107 of.the Streets and
Highways Code provide for allocation and expenditure within
cities of.amounts transferred to -the State Highway Fund
from the Highway Users Tax Rand; and
WHEREAS.. Section 195 of the Streets and Highways Code
provides that at least three -fifths of the money allocated
under the provisions of Section 194 shall be expended for
the construction of streets included in the systen of
major city streets within each city, and the'balance for
maintenance; and
WHEREAS, in accordance vrith the requirements of Section
196 of the Streets and.Highways Code, the city has set up by
Ordinance No.'333
a Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund in which shall be
deposited all amounts allocated pursuant to Section 194 and
received by the city; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of
the several promises to be faithfully performed by each as.
hereinafter set forth, the city and the department do hereby
mutually agree as follows:
ARTICLE I. BUDGET PROVISIONS
A budget showing the estimated expenditure of funds, to
` be allocated'to the city by the State, shall be submitted
annually by tye.city for approval by' the department as pro-
vided for under Section 197 of this Code.
A budget approval by the department shall consist of an
acknowledgment of the submittal of a budget by the city, a
statement of the funds available for budgeted expenditures.,..
a statement of estimated expenditures by projects, and the
signature of the officer approving the budget for the
department.
The amount budgeted for a project may be revised, or
other projects added, by submission by the city of a supple-
nental budget for approval by the department.
The annual revenue and the amounts provided for the
projects listed in an approved budget are estimated amounts.
In the event that the actual revenue or the actual cost of
the projects differ from estimated amounts, the approved
budget may be amended only by a supplemental budget.
When a budget proposes expenditure of other funds for a
project in conjunction with the -expenditure of state allocated
funds, the project statement shall show the amounts and names
of the cooperative funds Including city funds, if any. It is
agreed that the cooperative agencies, including the city,
need not approve or budget -such cooperative funds before the
city submits.1ts budget for approval of the department.
When a project, included in a budget submitted by the
city and approved by the department, is proposed to be jointly
financed with State allocated funds, other cooperative funds,
If any, and with an allocation of State highway funds by the
California Highway Commission, it is agreed that the obligations
of both the city and the department under this agreement are
contingent upon the allocation of the necessary funds for the
project by the California Highway•Commisslon and upon the
budgeting of the necessary cooperative funds by the city or
by the other cooperative agencies.
In the event the cooperative funds are not allocated or
budgeted, the city may submit a supplemental.budaet to the
department for approval for.rebudgeting the state allocated
funds.
Upon approval by the department, the budget as submitted
by the legislative body of the city shall become a part of
- 2 -
this agreement and all work and expenditures of the allocated
funds are to be Trade in accordance with the terms of the
approved budgets, and of this agreement and any supplements
thereof.
ARTICLE II. DELEGATION OF EXPENDITURE
The department hereby delegates to the city the expend-
iture of funds.to defray the cost of the work described in
the approved budget, except for those projects noted in such
budget to be accomplished by the department in behalf of the
city.
ARTICLE III. MAINTENANCE
Unless otherwise authorized in writing by the.department,
all streets will be maintained by or under the direct super-
vision of the city. Maintenance shall be as defined in Section
27 of the Streets and Highways Code, as modified by Section
195 of the Code. Maintenance work shall be adequate to
preserve and keep the roadway, structures, and facilities
in the safe and usable condition to which they have been
improved or constructed.
ARTICLE IV. RIGHT OF WAY
Expenditures for rights of way may include the cost'of
the acquisition of land and interests therein for projects
included in an approved budget; removing, demolishing, moving,
resetting, and altering obstructing buildings, structures,
utility Installations and other improvements; the payment of
any and all damages to property arising by reason of the
project ; court costs; and all other expense necessary or
Incidental to providing aright of way clear and free of.all
obstructions or encumbrances.
The right of way will be acquired by either the city or
the department as -noted on the approved budget.
ARTICLE V. SURVEYS AND PLANS
The necessary surveys and plans for the work as'desig-
nated on the approved budget will be made by the city or
the department as noted on the approved budget.
- 3 -
t�
M
ARTICLE VI. CONSTRUCTION WORK BY CITY
Construction shall be as defined in Section 29 of the
Streets and Highways Code, as modified by Section 195 of
the Code.
The city will construct or cause to be constructed by
others, in accordance with approved plans, specifications
and estimates to be submitted therefor, the improvements
described in the approved budget.
Any significant changes made in the approved plans or
specifications will require department approval, either
prior to making such changes, or at the time the final
report is submitted in those cases where advance approval
cannot be obtained without costly delay to the work, or
where through inadvertence advance approval has not been
obtained. The department's approval, before or after changes
are made, will establish the eligibility of such -changes
for financing with allocated funds.
The construction work described in an approved budget
shall be performed by contract unless the performance thereof
by day labor is approved by the department.
The work shall be done to the satisfaction of the depart-
rient and is subject.at all times to inspection and approval
by the authorized representatives of the department.
ARTICLE-VII. CONSTRUCTION WORK BY DEPARTMENT
Construction shall be as defined in Section 29 of the
Streets and Highways Code, as modified by Section 195 of
the Code.
The department will construct or cause to be constructed
the improvements described in an approved budget as worst by
department in accordance with approved plans, specifications
and estimates therefor. '
Any minor changes in the approved plans and specifications
due to unforeseen contingencies or made desirable by conditions
developing during the progress of the work may be made by the
department.
The work will be performed by contract or by State forces
as may be, in the opinion of the department, for the best
Interests of the city and the department.
- 4 -
Indirect charges for engineering overhead will be
assessed in accordance with Division of Highways' standard
practises for any work done by State forces.
ARTICLE VIII. VEHICULAR PARKING
It is agreed that in accordance with the provisions
of Section 22502 of the Vehicle Code, the city will permit
parallel parking only, within the limits of each of the
construction projects described in an approved budget. It
Is agreed that the provisions of the Vehicle Code permitting
angle parking by ordinance are not applicable within the
limits of the aforementioned work. It is further agreed
that if a currently effective ordinance permits angle park-
ing within the limits of such work, the ordinance shall be
repealed and certified copies of this action shall be
transmitted with the final report.
ARTICLE IX. FUNDS
Funds to defray the cost of the work described in an
approved budget will be paid quarterly as revenues for
expenditure in cities are received in the State Highway Fund.
Payment of these funds to the city will be based upon
an approved annual budget. Such payment to the city will
be reduced by any amounts remaining unexpended in the cityts
Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund attributable to
completed projects covered by these funds, or for work to
be performed by the department, or for contingency projects
as shown on the approved budget.
The construction cost, including construction engineer-
ing, of the traffic signals and safety lighting to be installed
at an intersection of a major city street with a State highway
will be financed jointly by the city and the department in
the same ratio as the number of intersecting roads under each -
jurisdiction bears to the total number of roads entering the
Intersection. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the
agency designated in the approved budget to prepare the plans,
specifications and estimate will bear the entire cost of such
preparation.
All revenue received.from rentals or sales of real
property or equipment purchased with gas tax funds, and all
interest earned from investments of monies in the cityts
Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund shall be credited to
the city's Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund.
- 5 -
W"
The amount provided for the projects listed in an
approved budget must not be exceeded, and no monies may be
expended by the city from the Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund except for the projects listed in the budget
without submission and approval of a supplemental budget.
All funds allocated under the provisions of Section
2107 of the Streets and Highways Code in excess of -such.
funds budgeted for expenditure will accumulate for future
budgeting and expenditure.
ARTICLE X. P33TAL REPORTS
Within ninety days after expiration of each fiscal.
year, the city shall submit to the department an annual
report of all expenditures from the Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund for maintenance.
Within the time specified in Section 201 of the Streets
and Highways Cade, the city shall submit a final report of
expenditures made from the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement
Fund for acquisition of rights of way or for construction.
The department shall, within the time specified, submit a
final report to the city of expenditures made by the depart-
ment in behalf of the city.
Annual reports of maintenance expenditures, and final
reports of expenditures for rights of way and construction,
shall be made on forms as specified by the department.
ARTICLE XI. SUPPLEXEMS TO AGREEMIT
Supplements to this agreement may be executed to provide
for other matters not covered -herein.
ARTICLE XII. OTHER STATE HIGHWAY FUNDS ALLOCATED TO CITIES'
It is agreed that this master agreement covers the budget-
ing and expenditure of other funds for construction that may
be transferred to and allocated from the State Highway Fund to
cities, provided such funds are required by statutes to be
expended in accordance with the provisions -of Sections 194-to
202, inclusive, of the Streets and Highways Code.
- 6 -
`d
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have affixed
their signatures- � cial seals, the city on the
er day of r' � �;f� , 19. and the departrsent
on the day of r/, 19oe[,
Approval, recommended:M)
?ko 6� .
Engineer -of ty and
Cooperative -Projects
Approved as to form
and procedure:
torney, Department of
Public Works
—7—
CITY OF �'� y1;iiGTON Bi:ACH
VIM"
City Clerk -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
'2
B r
Assistant Sta a Highway
Enginee
r
REsowna vu. 1462
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY 'OF irm inaT-oM rr..AGH
APPROVING MASTER AGREEMENT FOR EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES
VaMREAS, a proposed agreement with the State Department
of Public Works, Division of Highways, for the budgeting and
expenditure of funds allocated from the State highway fund
to cities has been presented to the city council for con-
sideration; and
WHEREAS, the city council has heard read said agreement
and is familiar with the contents thereof;
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the city council of the City
of Huntir�;ton Beach that said agreement be and
the same is hereby approved and the mayor and the city clerk
, are directed to sign the same on behalf of said.City, said
agreement to be binding upon the City upon its execution by
the authorized officials of the State.
ADOPTED this loth day of Feb--mry , 19 61 .
r
Mayo r oft e City of
Huntington Beach
Attest:
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution;wae-dulyrand
regularly passed by the city counci o the City of-,'-. _ :r
at a regular meeting thereof held -- 11untilg;ton, Ycach
�d ej
Clerk of t e City f 'Hunt izi:-toil-Beach
PROJECT AGREEMENT-1959-60FISCAL YEAR
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT entered into by and between
the City of Ihnitiziaton Beach , hereinafter
referred to as the city, and the Department of Public
Works of the State of California, hereinafter referred
to as the department,
WITNESSETH, THAT, WHEREAS, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 194 and Section 2107 of the Streets
and Highways Code, a sum equal to five -eighths of one cent
per gallon tax under the Motor Vehicle Fuel License Tax
Law shall be transferred to the State Highway Fund for
expenditure in cities in the proportion that the total
population of each city bears to the total population of
all cities in this State; and
WHEREAS, Section 195 of the Streets and Highways Code
provides that two -fifths of the money allocated under the
provisions of Section 194 shall be expended for the
maintenance of the system of major city streets and of the
secondary city streets within such city; provided that,
with the approval of the department, a portion of such
money so allocated for maintenance may be expended for
construction of streets included within the system of major
city streets within such city; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section
196 of the Streets and Highways Code, the city has set up
by Ordinance No, 3S a Special Gas Tax
Street Improvement Fund inn which shall be deposited all
amounts allocated pursuant to Section 194 and received by
the city;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and
of the several promises to be faithfully performed by each
as hereinafter set forth, the city and the department do
hereby mutually agree as follows:
-I-
9
The projects and the estAmted expenditure thereror as listed
hereinafter constitute�t budget hi tofbre submitted by, the city,
which has bear.# _ and- in- hereby-w' rc ed- by the department:
Project mile's Desorktion JCL nt
14 main street From Tv*lath Stet l;;.O G . pave— and- dra a
to Spit Avenue facilities 13#000-00
15 Golden West Avenue frm Slater 1*0 O; j*- have and dminage
.venue to Falia Avenue structures `�Z22.
Total POMO.03,
902
I
ARTICLE II. SURVEYS AND PLANS
The city will make the necessary surveys and plans
for the work designated in Article I.
ARTICLE M. CONSTRUCTION
The city will construct or cause to be constructed by
or under its direct supervision, and in accordance with
the approved plans, specifications and estimates therefor,
the improvements described in Article I.
Plans, specifications and a detailed estimate of cost
shall be submitted to the department for approval before
the work is advertised for bids or in case of work approved
to be done by day labor before work is started; and no
changes may be made in the approved plans or specifications
without the prior approval of the department.
The construction work described in Article I shall be
performed by contract unless the performance thereof by
day labor shall be approved by the department.
The work shall be done to the satisfaction of the depart-
ment and shall be subject at all times to inspection and
approval by the authorized representatives of the department.
Any city -owned equipment used for the construction work
described in Article I may be charged for upon a rental
basis to cover depreciation and repairs in case rental rates
already have been established by the city; otherwise, allow-
ance for depreciation and repairs may be charged for as
approved by the department.
ARTICLE IV, PARKING RESTRICTIONS
The city will permit parallel parking only within the
limits of the construction work described in Article I.
The provisions of the Vehicle Code permitting angle parking
by ordinance are not applicable within the limits of this
work. If an ordinance exists permitting angle parking
within the limits of this work this ordinance shall be
repealed and certified copies of this action shall be trans-
mitted with the final report.
r 3
ARTICLE V. FUNDS
Funds to defray the cost of the work described in
Article I and payable from revenue accruing under the
provisions of Section 2107 of the Streets and Highways
Code are available as follows:
xccruesd and wibud,;eted to June 30, 1959 $51,660.03
£stunted to accrue during the fiscal
year ending Juno 30, 1960 2395".00
Total $80,250.03
The am
ountof$is budgeted to defray
the coat the work WWbrA in Article I
The annual revenue and the amount provided for the
project listed in Article I are estimated amounts. In
the every that the actual revenue or the.actual coat of
the project differs from estimated amounts, the approved
budget may4be amended only by supplemental agreement.
The department hereby delegates to the city the
expenditure of the funds provided herein to defray the
cost of the work described in Article I.
Quarterly, as funds become available, the department
will pay to the oity $ from funds allocated
under Section 2107 of t •MMUs and Highways Code. In
addition, there is a sum of $ available in
the cityts Special Gas Tax StrAMMDOProvement Fund. From
these funds the projects budgeted herein and delegated to
the city will be financed.
_4
All revenue received from rentals or sales of real
property purchased with gas tax funds for right of way
purposes, and all interest earned on gas tax funds in
possession of the city shall be credited to the Special
Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund.
The amount provided for the project listed in
Article I Must not be exceeded, and no moneys may be
expended by the city from the Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund except for the project listed in
Article I without amending the budget 4 supplemental
agreement. Such supplemental agreement shall be valid
only when executed by the city and the department.
All funds allocated under the provisions of Section
2107 of the Streets and Highways Code in excess of such
funds budgeted herein for expenditure will accumulate for
future budgeting and expenditure.
ARTICLE YID FIIdAL REPORTS
The city will submit such reports as required by law
In such detail as required by the department. The reports
shall show in full all expenditures from all other funds
as well as expenditures from the Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund.
Within ninety days after the close of the fiscal year
ending June 30, 19 , the city shall submit on forms
furnished by the department a statement of expenditures
made from the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund
during the preceding year for the maintenance of the streets
described in Article I.
Within sixty days after completion of any item of the
budget for surveys and plans, acquisition of right of way
or construction, the city will submit to the department a
final report of expenditures made for such Work.
The reports shall be in the following form:
RIGHT OF WAY: Expenditures shall be segregated by
parcels and payment for each parcel analyzed as follows:
Value of land taken.
Severance damages less benefits.
Moving improvements.
Damages by change of grade, etc.
If excess land is acquired, the proposed
disposition thereof shall be shown.
0-5 r
Where removing, restoring or altering improvements
Is not Included in the payment for the land, the expendi-
tures for such items shall be reported for each parcel or
ownership. The report shall also show expenditures for
salary of right of way agent and miscellaneous expenditures
such as title reports., automobile operation, etc.
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING: The report shall show the
work accomplished and the cost thereof.
CONSTRUCTION: The report shall show payments to the
contractor detailed by contract items showing quantity,
unit, item, unit price and amount; and the amount paid for
any materials, supplies, labor or equipment furnished by
the city for use on the contract. Expenditures for work
performed by day labor shall be detailed to show the
quantity for each item of work, the unit cost and amount.
-b-
ARTICLE yiI. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
No State officer or employee shall be liable for any-
thing done or omitted to be done by the city in the
performance of any work delegated to the city under this
agreement. The city shall, in the event any claim is made
against any State officer or employee by reason of such
work, indemnify and hold harmless such officer or employee
from any damage or liability by reason of any such dlaim.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have affixed
their signatures and official seals, the city on the
day of , 1959 , and the department on
the day or , 19 59 .
Approval recommended:
4st DIstrict MIneer
migineer of City an
Cooperative Projects
Approved as to form
and procedure:
CITY OF HUNiIN{-OF BEACH
. eyor
City CierZt
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Attorney, Department of By AssistantState way
Public forks Engineer
E03
i • r
RESOLUTION NO. 1383
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF fi 33?.-TOY BFJ.CH ADOPTING BUDGET AND APPROVING
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR EXPENDITURE OF
• 1 GAS TAX ALLOCATION FOR MAJOR CITY STREETS.
WHEREAS, a memorandum of agreement has been presented to be
entered into with the State of California in accordance with a
project statement submitted by the City of lrantington Beach
for expenditure of the gas tax allocation to cities for the
fiscal year 195940 s and
WHEREAS, the city council hau heard read said agreement in
full and is familiar with the contents thereof;
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the city council of the City of
Huntington Beach that said project statement be and
it is hereby adopted as the budget of proposed expenditures of
the gas tax allocation to cities, and said agreement be and the
same is hereby approved and the mayor and the city clerk are
directed to sign the same on behalf of said City, said agreement
to be binding upon the City upon its execution by the authorized
officials of the State.
ADOPTED this 20th day of July , 1959 .
Mayor of the y of liuntinaeon Beach:
Attest:-�.
c3.1;7 cie, r oi- tine ClEy or Umtington 11e0h
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution xas'duly and
regularly passed by the city council of the City of Hunt on Beach
at a regular meeting thereof held J 20th �� 590
M
Huntin„ton Beach
ENGINEERING PROJECT AGREEMEPIT - 1958-59 FISCAL YEAR
MEMORANDUM OF liu3�izgn e ch d into by and between
the City of hereinafter
referred to as the city, and the Department of Public
Works of the State of California, hereinafter referred to
as the department,
WITNESSETH, THAT, WHEREAS, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 2107.5 of the Streets and Highways
Code, certain sums shall be transferred to the State
Highway Fund for expenditure exclusively for engineering
costs and administrative expenses in respect to city
streets; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of
Section 196 of the Streets aild Highways Code, the city has
set up by Ordinance No. 386 ' a Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund in whicn shall be deposited all amounts
allocated pursuant to Section 194 and 2107.5 and received
by the city;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and
of the several promises to be faithfully performed by each
as hereinafter set forth, the city and the department do
hereby mutually agree as follows:
- 1 -
ARTICLE I. PROJECT
The project and the estimated expenditure therefor
as listed hereinafter constitute the budget heretofore
submitted by the city, which has been, and is hereby,
approved by the department;
Project No. E - 3
I Preliminary Engineering
(Surveys, plans, specifications
estimates of cost
II Construction Engineering
III Advance Planning
ia Traffic studies
b Planning surveys
c Estimating cost of
correcting deficiencies
(d) Materials, research and
testing
(e) Other
IV Curb and gutter grade surveys
V Miscellaneous
Institute of Transportation and
Traffic Engineering 120.00
Total $120.00
2 -
ARTICLE II. DELEGATION OF WORK
The city will perform the work herein described.
ARTICLE III. FUNDS
Funds to defray the cost of the work described in
Article I and payable from revenue accruing under the
provisions of Section 2107.5 of the Streets and Highways
Code are available as follows:
Unexpended under project S-1 1
(City) 897.11-
Unexpended under project 8-2 (City) 11
622.60•
Allocation for the fiscal year
ending June 30: 1959 ,.3,000.00 -
Total �5,519.71
The amount of 020.00 Is budgeted to defray the cost
of the work described in Article I.
The amount of 42,519.71 remains unexpended in the
city's Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and from
such funds the city will finance the work budgeted herein.
�3-
The amount provided for the project listed in
Article I must not be exceeded, and no moneys may be
expended by the city from the Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund except for the project listed in
Article I without amending the budget by supplemental
agreement. Such supplemental agreement shall be valid
only when executed by the city and the department.
All funds allocated under the provisions of Section
2107.5 of the Streets and High*gays Code in excess of
such funds budgeted herein for expenditure will accumulate
for future budgeting and expenditure.
ARTICLE IV. ANNUAL AND FINAL REPORTS
Within sixty days after completion of each project
the city shall submit to the department a final report.
If the work is not completed prior to the end of
the fiscal year, an annual progress report of expendi-
tures shall be submitted to the department by the city,
within sixty days after the end of the fiscal year.
The report shall show the work accomplished in
such detail as required by the department.
-4
. y
r
i
RESOLUTION No. 1339
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
' CITY OF iR KIW10K BEACH ADOPTING BUDGET AND APPROVING
` MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR EXPENDITURE OF
FUNDS ALLOCATED.UNDER SECTION 2107.5 OF THE STREETS
AND HIGHWAYS CODE
WHEREAS, a memorandum of agreement has been presented
to be entered into with the State of California in accordance
with a project statement submitted by the City of Huntington h
for expenditure of the engineering allocation to cities for
the fiscal year 1958-59, and
WHEREAS, the city council has heard read said agreement
in full and is familiar with the contents thereof;
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the city council of the
City of Huntington Beach that said project statement
be and it is hereby adopted as the budget of proposed
expenditures of the engineering allocation to cities, and
said agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the
mayor and the city clerk are directed to sign the same on
behalf of said city, said agreement to be binding upon the
city upon its execution by the authorized officials of the
State.
ADOPTED this 19th day of January 1959
Mayor of the city or Bunt t*.% Beach
- Attest: 4i>
y: e o eCity of liuntltk+'-tan Beach
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly
":.' and_ regularly passed by the city council of the City of
l:urtington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held
January 19, 19 59.
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach
ARTICLE V. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
No State officer or employee shall be liable for
anything done or omitted to be done by the city in the
performance of any work delegated to the city under this
agreement. The city shall, in the event any claim is
'\made against any State officer or employee by reason of
such work, indemnify and hold harmless such officer or
employee from any damage or liability by reason of any
such claim.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have affixed
their signatures and official seals, the city on the
day of , 19 59, and the department on
the day of , 19 59 .
Approval recommended:
District Enneer
Engineer or City an
Cooperative Projects
Approved as to form
and procedure:
CITY OF H=33;GTON BEACH
By
i,
Mayor
/f City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
Attoxmeys Department of AselstantState g way
Public Works Engineer
EGB
- 5 -
IT U XTINGTON BEAC
19.58
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
FOR EXPENDITURE OF GAS TAX
ALLOCATION FOR MAJOR CITY STREETS
PROJECT AGREEMENT - 1958 FISCAL YEAR
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT entered into by and between
the City of Huntington Beach , hereinafter
referred to as the city, and the Department of Public
Works of the State of California, hereinafter referred
to as the department,
WITNESSETH, THAT, WHEREAS, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 194 and Section 2107 of the Streets
and Highways Code, a sum equal to five -eighths of one cent
per gallon tax under the Motor Vehicle Fuel License Tax
Law shall be transferred to the State Highway Fund for
expenditure in cities in the proportion that the total
population of each city bears to the total population of
all cities in this State; and
WHEREAS, Section 195 of the Streets and Highways Code
provides that two -fifths of the money allocated under the
provisions of Section 194 shall be expended for the main-
tenance of the system of major city streets and of the sec-
ondary city streets within such city; provided that, with
the approval of the department, a portion of such money so
allocated for maintenance may be expended for construction
of streets included within the system of major city streets
within such city; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of Section
196 of the Streets and Highways Code, the city has set up
by Ordinance No, 86 a Special Gas Tax
Street Improvement Tund in which shall be deposited all
amounts allocated pursuant to Section 194 and received by
the city;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and
of the several promises to be faithfully performed by each
as hereinafter not forth, the city and the department do
hereby mutually agree as follows:
- 1 -
ARTICLE I. PROJECT
The project and the estimated expenditure therefor as listed
hereinafter constitute the budget heretofore submitted b7 the city
which has been, and is hereby, approved by the department:
Mnjor City
project Location Miles Description Street Funds City Funds
12 fiain Street fron Twelfth 1.00 Grade, pave, realign and
Street to Clay Street construct curb and gutter
and drainage structures
Construction
( additional amount) 425,000.00 $79725.01
i
ro
f
S
ARTICLE II. CONSTRUCTION
The city will construct or cause to be constructed by
or under its direct supervision, and in accordance with the
approved plans, specifications and estimates therefor, the
improvements described -in project 12.
Plans, specifications and a detailed estimate of
cost shall be submitted to the department for approval
before the work is advertised for bids or in case of
work approved to be done by day labor before work is
started; and no changes may be made in the approved plans
or specifications without the prior approval of the
department.
The construction work described in Article I shall
be performed by contract unless the performance thereof
by day labor shall be approved by the department.
The work shall be done to the satisfaction of the
department and shall be subject at all times to inspec-
tion and approval by the authorized representatives of
the department.
Any city -owned equipment used for the construction
work described in Article I may be charged for upon a
rental basis to cover depreciation and repairs in case
rental rates already have been octablished by the city;
otherwise, allowance for depreciation and repairs may be
charged for as approved by the department.
- 3 -
ARTICLE Ill. FUILIMS
Funds to defray the cost of the work described in
Article I and payable from revenue accruing under the
provisions of Section 2107 of the Streets and Highways
Code are available as follows:
Unexpended under project 13 (State)
Accrued and unbudgeted
to June 30, 1956
Accrued during the fiscal
year ending, June 30, 1957
Estimated to accrue during the
fiscal year ending June 30, 1958
Total
t 440.28
1*234.75
18,139.79
. 1?, 730.00,
(37#544•82
The amount of $ 25*000.00 is budgeted to defray
the cost of the work described in Article I. and in addition,
the amount of 07,725.01 is to bo contributed from City Funds.
The annual revenue and the amount ps ovided for the
project listed in Article I are estimated amounts. In
the event that the actual revenue or the actual cost of
the project differs from estimated amounts, the approved
bu:iget may be antendcd only by supplemental agreement.
The department hereby delegates to the city the
expenditure of the funds provide, herein to defray the
cost of the work described in Article I.
The department will pay quarterly to the city its
pro rats share of the money allocated under the provisions
of Section 2107 of the Streets and Highways Code until
k 25,000.00 budgeted herein and delegated to the
city for expenditure hRs been paid, in addition to the
Fmount of t o e remaining unexpended in
wl:e city':; special gas tax street improvement fund.
All revenue received from rentals or sales of real
property purchased with gas tax funds for riCht of way
purposes, and all interest earned on gas tax funds in
possession of the city shall be credited to the Special
Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund.
a 4 r
The amount provided for the project listed in Arti-
cle I must not be exceeded$ and no moneys may be expended
by the city from the special gas tax street improvement
fund except for the project listed in Article I without
amending the budget by supplemental agreement. Such sup-
plemental agreement shall be valid only when executed by
the city and the department.
All funds allocated under the provisions of Section
2107 of the Streets and Highways Code in excess of such
funds budgeted herein for expenditure will accumulate for
future budgeting and expenditure.
ARTICLE IV, FINAL REPORTS
The city will submit such reports as required by law
in such detail as required by the department. The reports
shall show in full all expenditures from all other funds
as well as expenditures from the special gas tax street
improvement fund.
Within sixty days after the close of the fiscal year
ending June 30, 1958, the city shall submit to the depart-
ment a statement of expenditures made from the special gas
tax street improvement fund during the preceding year for
the maintenance of the streets described in Article I.
Maintenance expenditures shall be analyzed by func-
tions and objects as follows:
Functions. -
Travelled way, including roadside and improved
shoulders.
Structures.
Safety devices, including stop signs, automatic
signals, traffic stripes and parking Stripes.
Street cleaning, including the removal of snow
or sand drift.
Objects:
Operating expense.
Salaries and wages.
Equipment.
40 s -
Within sixty days after completion of any item of
the budget for surveys and plans, acquisition of right
of Way or construction, the city will submit to the de-
partment a final report of expenditures made for such
work.
The reports shall be in the following form:
RIGHT OF WAY: Expenditures shall be segregated by
parcels and payment for each parcel analyzed as follows:
Value of land taken.
Severance damages less benefits.
Moving improvements.
Damages by change of grade, etc.
Where removing, restoring or altering improvements
is not included in the payment for the land, the expendi-
tures for such items shall be reported for each parcel or
ownership. The report shall also show expenditures for
salary of right of way agent and miscellaneous expendi-
tures such as title reports, agent's expense account, auto-
mobile operation, etc.; these expenditures being analyzed
by the three objects:
Operating expense.
Salaries and wages.
Equipment.
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING: The report shall show the
work accomplished and shall be analyzed by the three ob-
jects:
Operating expense.
Salaries and wages.
Equipment.
CONSTRUCTION: The report shall show payments to the
contractor detailed by contract items shoring quantity,
unit, item, unit price and amount; and the amount paid for
any materials, supplies, labor or equipment furnished by
the city for use on the contract. Expenditures for work
performed by day labor shall be detailed to shoo the quantity
for each item of work, the unit cost and amount.
-6-
r�w..r....r.,1— __ - - sw r
*tl
ARTICLE y� MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
No State officer or employee shall be liable for any-
thing done or omitted to be done by the city in the per-
formance of any Work delegated to the city under this
agreement. The city shall, in the event any claim is made
against any State officer or employee by reason of such
work, indemnify and hold harmless such officer or employee
from any damage or liability by reason of any such claim.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have affixed
their signatures and official seals, the city on the _ S "4
day of , 19 57, and the department on
the _ c g of -- , 19 5 P
Approval reco=ended:.eZry CITY OF HU2MITOT02y BEACH
i
wigineer of Vity ana
Cooperative Projects
Approved as to form
and procedure:
Mayo
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT GF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
y W
t z 14 le eJ
orney, Depart o ss atant ate Highway
i Public Works Engineer
IIHQ: a
-7-
RESOLUTION NO. 1315
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUNTII;GTON BEACH ADOPTING BUDGET AND APPROVING
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR EXPENDITURE OF
GAS TAX ALLOCATION FOR MAJOR CITY STREETS.
WHEREAS, a memorandum of agreement has been presented
to be entered into with the State of California in accord-
ance with a project statement submitted by the City of
Huntington Beach for expenditure of the gas tax allo-
cation to cities for the fiscal year 1958, and
WHEREAS, the city council has heard read said agree-
ment in full and is familiar with the contents thereof;
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the city council of the
City of Huntington Beach that said project statement
be and it is hereby adopted as the budget of proposed ex-
penditures of the gas tax allocation to cities, and said
agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the mayor
and.the city clerk are directed to sign the same on behalf
of said City, said agreement to be binding upon the City
upon its execution-by•the authorized officials of the State.
ADOPTED this 5t1L day of pit 1957.
Mayor'of the City of Hun n,;to n Beach
Attest: - -
City Cif3k of the City of Huntington Unch -1-.. '
I hereby certify that the foregoing revolution was -_
duly and regularly passed by the city council of the City
Of Hu.ntinEton Beach at a regular meeting thereof held =
August 5th , 19 57 .
MC-10
Clem bf the City of HuntinGton beach
HUA�,yvbA,mA
bl- w�
19,5 7
o� Aqat,,-nr-n+
fIDY ACC-LLv*hLllGkVtDfl GC'5-.fO-X
ANCO.Alo-A �ar (Noe C,+) 5+1 t+5
S
ACCUAULATION AGREMENi -1957 FISCAL YEAR
MEMDEAHUM OF AGREEHENT entered into by and between
• the City of HuntinSton Beach , hereinafter referred
to as the city, and the Department of Public Works of the
State of California, hereinafter referred to as the depart -
rent,
Z•.ITNESSLTh, THAT, Wh'EREAS, in accordance with the pro-
visions of Section 194 of the Streets and Highways Code,
the department shall e,.,pend or cause to be expended within
the cities of this State the amcunt transferred to the State
Highway Fund in accordance with Section 2107 for expendi-
ture upon najor city streets in the proportion that the total
population of each city bears to the total population of all
cities in this State; and
WrIE=.EASI-imder the provisions of Section 200 of the
Streets and Highways Code the city desires to authorize the
accumulation of funds accruing to said city during the fis-
cal year ending June 30, 19 r,;
NOW, TIEREFORE, it is nutually agreed that the depart-
ment 011 accumulate and hold for future expenditure within
the city, or until such time as the city submits a budget
in accordance with the provisions of Section 197 of the
-1-
F9
Streets and Highways Code, all funds accruing from the gas
tax allocation to cities during the fiscal year ending 3une
30, 19
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have,a.ffixed
their signatures and official seals, the citF.,onthe
A�;ust
day of _ _ �_ _ _ _ 195b and the department -on r
the day of 19r.
r
Approval recommended: CITY OF 11 TI 11OTO1i "B" iCH `
% By
District Engineer kiaym-
Engineer of City and
Cooperative Projects
Approved as to form
and procedure:
Attorney, Department o
Public Works
LEOiap
--2-•
City Clerk
STATE -OY CALIFORNIk
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF EIGHWAYS
Ey
Assistant State Highway
Engineer
.s
u
.
RESOLUTION N+O. 1283
' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or HL'IITIKOT0.3 BEACH
APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF AGREEKEPT FOR ACCUMULATION OF THHEE
GAS TAX ALLOCATION TO CITIES
WHEREAS, a memorandum of agreement has been presented
to be entered into with the State of California for accumu-
lation of the gas tax allocation to cities for the fiscal
yeor 19311 in
the
City
of Huntington Bench
; and
WHEREAS,
the
city
council has heard rend
said agree-
ment in full and is familiar with the contents thereof;
THEREFORE:, be it resolved by the City council of the
City of Huntington Beach that, under the provisions of
Section 200 of the Streets and highways Code, the gas tax
allocated for major city streets be accumulated for future
expenditure, and that said agreement be and the same is
hereby approved,
and
the mayor and the
city"
clerk
are
directed to sign
the
same on behalf of
said
city ,
said
agreement to be binding upon the city upon its execution
by the authorized officials of the State.
ADOPTED this bth day of AuM at , 1.9t
•
Vil"ITCR MR
Kayor of the City of Huntington die77-
h
A t t e ISM L. Henribkaen
Clerk of t e City of Iluntit,ton Bench
,- I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly
and regularly passed by the :It,;. council of the } y of
c
Huntington Beach at a reguler meeting thereof he a on
August 6,
JCHN L. IMMIC -E-IN
Cle k of the City of Funtington Leach
rF
rr xi r
THE CITY OF HUNTI'NGTON BEACH
Map on File
with City Clerk