Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGHD, Inc. - 2018-05-21Dept. ID PW 18-018 Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: 5/21/2018 Af p V67) 5-0 .Z ( >ETM5W St e7� —MSMJ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR. CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 5/21/2018 SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Travis K. Hopkins, PE, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Approve and authorize execution of Professional Services Contracts for On Call Ocean and Engineering Services with Moffatt & Nichol, Anchor QEA, LLC., and GHD, Inc., each in an amount not to exceed $150,000 Statement of Issue: The Public Works Department requires on-call/as-needed ocean and other engineering services to support staff for design of capital improvement projects. Financial Impact: The City's FY 2017/18 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget totals $28 million (All Funds) for approved projects citywide. Each approved CIP project has a budget containing sufficient funding for design, environmental, engineering, construction, project management and other required costs. The three (3) recommended ocean and engineering service contracts have a maximum value of $450,000 over the next three years and will be funded on an as -needed basis within each project's individual CIP budget. As such, no additional funding is required by this action. Recommended Action: A) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute $150,000 "Professional Services Contract Between the City of Huntington Beach and Moffatt & Nichol for On Call Ocean and Engineering Services;" and, 4 5CF_5EPC <,A PILE B) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute $150,000 "Professional Services Contract Between the City of Huntington Beach and Anchor QEA, LLC. for On Call Ocean and Engineering Services;" and, + SEC SE��1j2FC(E }� T— C) Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute $150,000 "Professional Services Contract Between the City of Huntington Beach and GHD, Inc. for On Call Ocean and Engineering Services." Alternative Action(s): Do not authorize the contracts and direct staff with an alternate action. Budgeted Capital Projects could be delayed until new contracts are approved. Analysis: On November 28, 2017, the City advertised a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") for On -Call Engineering and Professional Consulting Services. Proposals were requested and submitted in compliance with Chapter 3.03 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. Four (4) proposals were received for ocean and engineering services. In accordance with a qualifications based selected Item 16. - 1 HB -474- Dept. ID PW 18-018 Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: 5/21/2018 procurement per the Federal "Brooks Act," State SB 419, and the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 3.03 "Professional Services" the Public Works Department established a review board. Proposals were evaluated and ranked by a three (3) member panel review team established by the Public Works Department. The reviewers were a Principal Civil Engineer, a Planning Manager, and a Senior Planner. After conducting the entire evaluation process, including negotiation for competitive rates, the top three (3) firms were selected to increase opportunity for competitive proposals for future projects from qualified on call consultants, and they are Moffatt & Nichol, Anchor QEA, LLC., and GHD, Inc. A summary of evaluation sheets for the top (3) firms, and the fourth (4th) firm not selected are shown in Attachment 4. The contracts recommended in this Request for Council Action (RCA) are to support staff for ocean and design engineering of capital improvement projects. These services have historically been utilized to supplement City staff to meet annual CIP goals, as an extension of staff and/or to provide required expertise for unique projects. It is anticipated that these services will be required based on past years. Each project is evaluated on a case by case basis to determine if these as -needed contract services are necessary. The City's Capital Improvement Program ("CIP") is approximately $24.6 million in Fiscal Year 2017/18, and exceeds $28 million with continuing funds for projects approved from previous years. In addition, the proposed Fiscal Year 2018/19 CIP totals $24.7 million in new projects. Typical design and construction support costs from use of consultants on a CIP project can vary between ten (10) to twenty (20) percent of total costs for a CIP project. Therefore, it is practical to conservatively estimate minimum annual consultant costs would be approximately $2 million to the City for total CIP projects or $6 million within the next three (3) years. Ocean and engineering services are typically required for ocean related CIP projects. Therefore, these consultants were selected to meet projected workload over the next three years with a total contract limit of $450,000. Public Works Commission Action: Not applicable. Environmental Status: Not applicable. Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance and maintain infrastructure. Attachment(s): 1. Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Moffatt & Nichol for On Call Ocean and Engineering Services 2. Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and Anchor QEA, LLC. for On Call Ocean and Engineering Services 3. Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and GHD, Inc. for On Call Ocean and Engineering Services 4. Professional Service Award Analysis for Moffatt & Nichol, Anchor QEA, LLC., GHD, Inc, and Vendor #4 HB -475- Item 16. - 2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND GHD, INC FOR ON CALL OCEAN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and GHD, INC, a California corporation hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to provide on call ocean and engineering services; and Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts have been complied with; and CONSULTANT has been selected to perform these services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT." CONSULTANT hereby designates Paul Hermann who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. agree/ surfnet/professional Svcs mayor 1 of 11 10/12 3. TERM; TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of CONSULTANT are to commence on May 21st , 20 18 (the "Commencement Date"). This Agreement shall automatically terminate three (3) years from the Commencement Date, unless extended or sooner terminated as provided herein. All tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than three (3) years from the Commencement Date. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be shown in Exhibit "A." This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed to in writing by CITY and CONSULTANT. In the event the Commencement Date precedes the Effective Date, CONSULTANT shall be bound by all terms and conditions as provided herein. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT on a time and materials basis at the rates specified in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference into this Agreement, a fee, including all costs and expenses, not to exceed One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000). 5. EXTRA WORK In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A" or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSULTANT will undertake such work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 6. METHOD OF PAYMENT CONSULTANT shall be paid pursuant to the terms of Exhibit "B." agree/ surfnet/professional svcs mayor 2 of 11 10/12 7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT agrees that title to all materials prepared hereunder, including, without limitation, all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, computer code, language, data or programs, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall belong to CITY, and CONSULTANT shall turn these materials over to CITY upon expiration or termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. These materials may be used by CITY as it sees fit. 8. HOLD HARMLESS CONSULTANT hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, expenses, judgments, demands and defense costs (including, without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature or liability of any kind or nature) arising out of or in connection with CONSULTANT's (or CONSULTANT's subcontractors, if any) negligent (or alleged negligent) performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement by CONSULTANT, its officers, agents or employees except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. CONSULTANT will conduct all defense at its sole cost and expense and CITY shall approve selection of CONSULTANT's counsel. This indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by CONSULTANT. 9. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. This policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT's professional liability in an amount not less than One Million Dollars agree/ surfnet/professional Svcs mayor 3 of 11 10/12 ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and in the aggregate. The above -mentioned insurance shall not contain a self -insured retention without the express written consent of CITY; however an insurance policy "deductible" of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) or less is permitted. A claims -made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the initiation of the scope of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. CONSULTANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following PROJECT completion. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULTANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of at least two (2) years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this Agreement. If CONSULTANT fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the CITY with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the CITY shall have the right, at the CITY's election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not effect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. CONSULTANT waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the CITY for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the CITY. 10. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverage as required by this Agreement; the certificate shall: agree/ surfnet/professional svcs mayor 4 of 11 10/12 A. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; B. state that the policy is currently in force; and C. shall promise that such policy shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice; however, ten (10) days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSULTANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverage in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverage shall not derogate from CONSULTANT's defense, hold harmless and indemnification obligations as set forth in this Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of the policy of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on the insurance hereinabove required. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor herein and not as an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its own cost and expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the PROJECT and/or the services to be performed hereunder. 12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not the PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall agree/ surfnet/professional Svcs mayor 5 of 11 10/12 be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as provided herein. In the event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, exhibits, report, and evidence shall, at the option of CITY, become its property and shall be promptly delivered to it by CONSULTANT. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND DELEGATION This Agreement is a personal service contract and the work hereunder shall not be assigned, delegated or subcontracted by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the prior express written consent of CITY. If an assignment, delegation or subcontract is approved, all approved assignees, delegates and subconsultants must satisfy the insurance requirements as set forth in Sections 9 and 10 hereinabove. 14. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement. 15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 16. NOTICES Any notices, certificates, or other communications hereunder shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, to the addresses specified below. CITY and CONSULTANT may designate different addresses to which subsequent notices, certificates or agree/ surfnet/professional Svcs mayor 6 of 11 10/12 other communications will be sent by notifying the other party via personal delivery, a reputable overnight carrier or U. S. certified mail -return receipt requested: TO CITY: City of Huntington Beach ATTN: Tom Herbel 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 17. CONSENT When CITY's TO CONSULTANT: GHD, INC Attn: Paul Hermann 175 Technology Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618 949-585-5217 consent/approval is required under this Agreement, its consent/approval for one transaction or event shall not be deemed to be a consent/approval to any subsequent occurrence of the same or any other transaction or event. 18. MODIFICATION No waiver or modification of any language in this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by both parties. 19. SECTION HEADINGS The titles, captions, section, paragraph and subject headings, and descriptive phrases at the beginning of the various sections in this Agreement are merely descriptive and are included solely for convenience of reference only and are not representative of matters included or excluded from such provisions, and do not interpret, define, limit or describe, or construe the intent of the parties or affect the construction or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. 20. INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT The language of all parts of this Agreement shall in all cases be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any of the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is held by an arbitrator or court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, void, illegal or invalid, such holding shall not invalidate or affect the remaining agree/ surfnet/professional svcs mayor 7 of 11 10/12 covenants and provisions of this Agreement. No covenant or provision shall be deemed dependent upon any other unless so expressly provided here. As used in this Agreement, the masculine or neuter gender and singular or plural number shall be deemed to include the other whenever the context so indicates or requires. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrary to which the parties have no right to contract, then the latter shall prevail, and the provision of this Agreement which is hereby affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law. 21. DUPLICATE ORIGINAL The original of this Agreement and one or more copies hereto have been prepared and signed in counterparts as duplicate originals, each of which so executed shall, irrespective of the date of its execution and delivery, be deemed an original. Each duplicate original shall be deemed an original instrument as against any party who has signed it. 22. IMMIGRATIO CONSULTANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. 23. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSULTANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSULTANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for agrcc/ surfnel/professional svcs mayor 8 of 11 10/12 CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 24. ATTORNEY' S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to construe, interpret and/or enforce the terms and/or provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees, such that the prevailing party shall not be entitled to recover its attorney's fees from the nonprevailing party. 25. SURVIVAL Terms and conditions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, shall so survive. 26. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 27. SIGNATORIES Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature hereinbelow has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify CITY fully for any injuries or damages to CITY in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. 28. ENTIRETY The parties acknowledge and agree that they are entering into this Agreement freely and voluntarily following extensive arm's length negotiation, and that each has had the opportunity to consult with legal counsel prior to executing this Agreement. The parties also acknowledge and agree that no representations, inducements, promises, agreements or warranties, oral or otherwise, have been made by that party or anyone acting on that party's behalf, which are not embodied in this agree/ surfnet/professional svcs mayor 9 of 11 10/12 Agreement, and that that party has not executed this Agreement in reliance on any representation, inducement, promise, agreement, warranty, fact or circumstance not expressly set forth in this Agreement. This Agreement, and the attached exhibits, contain the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersede all prior understandings and agreements whether oral or in writing between the parties respecting the subject matter hereof. 29. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be effective on the date of its approval by the City Council. This Agreement shall expire when terminated as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized officers. agree/ surfnet/professional Svcs mayor 10 of 11 10/12 CONSULTANT, GI-11), INC CONIPANY NAME California Corp ration 13 PAUL wc�,MA"(,j print nalfic ITS: (circle 017c) C"llairmall/111-csidelit I'll President AND print willic ITS: (circle one) <=)CAlicl, Fillillichil officer/Asst. Sccrcllry -. I I casurcr UTY Of, HUNTI-NGTON BFACH,la municipal corp(gation ofthe State of California . a IIA f%/tca'or City (--.Iei-k I N FITATT' 1,D AND APPROVI:D: - }hector co fr- AND APPROVI'l): t y - APPROVI'll- AST RM: ,v Cit<< Attorney pAV orllc� EXHIBIT "A" A. STATEMENT OF WORK: (Narrative of work to be performed) CONSULTANT shall provide consulting services on an 'as -needed' basis for projects to be determined during the tern of the agreement. During the term of the agreement, CITY may elect to solicit proposals from CONSULTANT. CITY shall issue task order for each project based upon the scope of services, work schedule, and fee proposal submitted to CITY for its review and approval. B. CONSULTANT'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: CONSULTANT'S duties and responsibilities shall be per CONSULTANT'S Statement of Qualification (Exhibit A), consistent with the City of Huntington Beach Request for Qualifications for On Call Ocean and Engineering Consulting Services. Upon award, and the contract period, if CONSULTANT chooses to assign different personnel to the project, CONSULTANT must submit the names and qualifications of these staff to CITY for approval before commencing work. C. CITY'S DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Furnish scope of work request for each project. 2. Furnish construction plans and specifications to the CONSULTANT. D. WORK PROGRAM/PROJECT SCHEDULE: A project schedule will be developed for each project assigned by CITY. Item 16. - 123 EXHIBIT A HB -596- r Statement of Qualifications for On -Call Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulting Services City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department January 11, 2018 Item 16. - 129 HB -602- • Na � z p HB -60.- Item 16. - 13 0 RON City of Huntington Beach �} Attn: Mr. Jim Slobojan, Fiscal Services Division 2000 Main Street Q Huntington Beach, CA 92648 z Re: Statement of Qualifications for On -Call Ocean Engineering and Professional Consulting Services Dear Mr. Slobojan: We appreciate the opportunity to work in partnership with the City of Huntington Beach to help maintain the quality of services n and facilities for City coastal and shoreline areas. We recognize that, more than ever, the City is being asked to "do more 0 with less" and we are ready to help you achieve its goals and protect and maintain these valuable resources. Because of the specialized nature of the anticipated work, we have assembled a comprehensive team to address all the elements that are m anticipated in this On -Call Coastal Engineering Request for Proposal. Qualifications include: • Positive client references and extensive experience serving in an on -call capacity m • Directly relevant waterfront, small craft harbor, and coastal zone project experience • Access to a global network of experience that can be applied to different types of projects as needed. • Discipline experts with specialized experience to perform as trusted advisors m • Staffing tools with local capacity to be responsive to the City's needs As a client -oriented firm, GHD views itself as an extension of the City's staff. Our experience working as an augmentation of staff for a number of Southern California municipalities means that we understand the technical and administrative aspects of Maintenance and Capital Improvement projects and the responsiveness that is expected from an on -call consultant. We also bring relevant experience in the waterfront and coastal environment which provides us with the ability to recognize the planning, permitting, implementation, and maintenance requirements of a waterfront project. Our approach is a reflection of our understanding for the need to work closely with City staff, while listening to the needs of the local community and stakeholders. Our in-house team includes experienced engineers, planners, scientists, surveyors, CAD technicians, and permitting and grant writing specialists, who can assist The City of Huntington Beach with the requested and other services, including: • Coastal Engineering Analysis • Marine Structural Inspection • Project Review and Plan Check Services • Permitting and Environmental Compliance • Preliminary and Final Design (PS&E) • Cost Estimating • Construction Management • Hydrology and Hydraulics • Project Funding and Financing • Stormwater Design • Traffic Engineering and Roadway Design • Civil/Structural Engineering • Asset and Facilities Management • Geotechnical/Geological Engineering • Feasibility and Economic Studies • Public Outreach Assistance • Bridge Inspection and Design • Emergency Response Teams We will also leverage our national and global experience when necessary to provide the City with solutions that have worked for similar waterfront and coastal project issues in other locations. Thank you for reviewing our qualifications and approach. We look forward to the opportunity to work with the City of Huntington Beach. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, GHD Paul Hermann, PE, Principal -In -Charge paul.hermann@ghd.com Robert Sherwood, PE, Project Manager robert.sherwood@ghd.com 175 Technology Drive, Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618 '- ---- 949 648 5299 www.ghd.com Item 16. - 131 GHD I City of Huntington Beac. H7 -604-.:all Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulting Services I i APPLICATION FORM HB -605- REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL VENDOR APPLICATION FORM TYPE OF APPLICANT: ❑ NEW ❑ CURRENT VENDOR Legal Contractual Name of Corporation: Contact Person for Agreement: Corporate Mailing Address: City, State and Zip Code: E-Mail Address: Phone: Contact Person for Proposals: Title: Business Telephone: Fax: E-Mail Address: Business Fax: Is your business: (check one) ❑ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ❑ FOR PROFIT CORPORATION Is your business: (check one) ❑ CORPORATION ❑ LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ❑ INDIVIDUAL ❑ SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP ❑ PARTNERSHIP ❑ UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION 1 of 2 tern 16 _ - 13 3 uR _tinti Names & Titles of Corporate Board Members (Also list Names & Titles of persons with written authorization/resolution to sign contracts) Names Federal Tax Identification Number: Title Phone City of Huntington Beach Business License Number: (If none, you must obtain a Huntington Beach Business License upon award of contract.) City of Huntington Beach Business License Expiration Date: 2 of 2 NR _An7 Ttem 16 _ - 11, EXHIBIT A: PRE -QUALIFICATION FORM ON -CALL OCEAN ENGINEERING & PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES SERVICE„ CATEGORY PROPOSING? Y/N rr (circle) A. Ocean Engineering Yes / No _ (Initial) Consultant is willing to execute the Agreement as drafted (See Appendix B). _ (Initial) Consultant is able to provide the insurance as required (See Appendix Q. Firm Name: Firm Address: J._ Signature: - Date: T Q _Af1Q Item 16 - 1 'll Ll Item 16. - 137 HB -610- z 0 Q U_ H J Q C0 G rr L.L W z 0 F_ 0 W W ABOUT GHD Established in 1928, GHD employs more than 8,500 people across five continents and serves clients in the global markets of water, energy and resources, environment, property and buildings, and transportation. Operating globally and delivering services locally, we are able to offer clients (like the City of Huntington Beach) the ability to develop a working relationship with our local staff while having access to our global experience base. GHD is wholly -owned by its people and is dedicated to understanding and helping our clients achieve their goals. We care for the well-being of our people, who are dedicated to assisting their communities and conducting business in an ethical and environmentally responsible manner. We offer our clients the confidence and peace of mind with GHD ranked 29th in the top 500 design firms by Engineering News -Record in 2017. As a firm, we are proud of our long tradition of repeat, local government clients. A full 90 percent of our clients are municipal agencies or government entities, and the majority of our work comes from repeat clients. We believe this illustrates not only our knowledge of specialized engineering disciplines, but also our willingness to listen and respond to individual client needs. Each of our project managers is an advocate for his or her client through the design, permitting, and construction process. Our goal, as a firm, is to tailor the best solution for a particular client and we are attentive to the fact that clients' needs and preferences vary. With one of our main offices in Irvine, we pride ourselves in serving the Orange County Community in the development of its public work projects. Having worked with both the County of Orange and OC Public Works we are confident that we are well qualified to serve City of Huntington Beach projects and we welcome the opportunity to do so through this On -Call Ocean Engineering Services proposal. GHD understands the requirements to deliver successful projects and we strive to: Provide exceptional services. That means building the expertise and technical capabilities of the firm to provide a full range of engineering and environmental solutions for our clients. It also means delivering services with integrity and personal attention, no matter how big or how small the project. We like it when our clients recognize us for delivering big -firm expertise with a small -firm style. Attract and motivate talented people. We never lose sight of the fact that all the services we offer and provide to our clients originate from people who choose to work at GHD. We provide exciting opportunities for individuals to thrive in a people and family -friendly environment. Our employees provide quality service because they are excited about the challenges and rewards of doing a great job. Add value to our communities. We believe in improving the quality of life in the communities in which we work and live. Whether it is sponsoring a charitable endeavors or encouraging our employees' participation in community organizations, we strive to make a difference. GHD staff of engineers, planners,. and environmental scientists is thoroughly versed in developing and analyzing alternatives and providing clients with cost-effective, practical design solutions in the following specialized areas: • Waterfront and Coastal Facility Planning and Design • Coastal Engineering and Marine Facility Renovation, Retrofit and Repair Design • Coastal and Waterfront Project Permitting, CEQA/ NEPA Compliance • Marina, Seawall and Bulkhead Inspection and Rehabilitation/Strengthen ing • Dredging and Hazardous Materials Management and Sediment Transport Modeling • Hydrographic/Topographic Survey and Mapping Sea Level Rise Studies and Mitigation • Construction Management and Inspection of Marine Structures • Waterfront Project Grant Writing Funding and Financing GHD I City of Huntington Beach I HB-611-11 Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulti Item 16. - 13 8 RELATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Bay View Bridge Inspection and Repairs, Upper Newport Back Bay Trail, Orange County, CA Owner: Orange County Parks Contact: Mr. Mansour Katany Phone: (949) 585-6428 Contract Amount: $56,500 Completion Date: November 2016 to September 2017 GHD conducted a scour analysis and structural assessment of an 84-foot-long pedestrian bridge on the Bayview Trail at the Upper Newport Bay Nature Reserve. The bridge is supported by two cast -in -place concrete abutments at the creek embankments. There was significant scour observed around the bridge abutments exposing some of the timber support piles, and compromising the capacity of the bridge. GHD produced a set of repair drawings to protect and maintain the stability of the abutments Relevant Project Tasks: Inspection/Structural Assessment; Repair of Abutment; Geotechnical Evaluation; Hydraulics and Scour Analysis; Plans, Specifications & Cost Estimates Relevant GHD Staff: Craig Lewis (PM), Robert Sherwood Municipal Pier at Aquatic Park, San Francisco, CA Owner: City/County of San Francisco Public Works & National Parks Service Contact: Steven Bosifevac, P.E., Regional Civil Engineer/ Regional Dam Safety Coordinator; Pacific West Regional Office - San Francisco, National Park Service Phone: (415) 623-2272 A/E Consultant Fee: $455,000 Start/Completion Date: 2016 GHD performed a structural condition assessment and provided repair design alternatives for the San Francisco Municipal Pier to facilitate repairs. Our team conducted an above- and below -water visual inspection of the pier structure and the results were used to generate conceptual repairs and an associated construction cost estimate. Inspections and assessments were in accordance with the MOTEMS and ASCE standards. Below -water inspections included Level I, II, and III efforts on the various portions of the pier piles and fixed breakwater. We developed conceptual damage repairs and performed a seismic assessment using linear elastic dynamic analysis and three-dimensional nonlinear static pushover methods, as well as reviewing strengthening alternatives. Relevant Project Tasks: Inspection and Structural Assessment; Public Access along Waterfront; Corrosion Mitigation Relevant GHD Staff: Craig Lewis (PM), Jeff Knauer m 0 i O z A O C 0 D O z Item 16. - 139 GHD I City of Huntington Beach HB-612-11 Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulting Services 13 0 z O Q U_ LL_ Q 0 75 LL n me F_ U W U) On -Call Waterfront Engineering Services Contract, Port of San Francisco, CA Owner: Port of San Francisco Contact: Mr. Joe Roger, Senior Project Manager Phone: (415) 272-2305 Project Cost: N/A A/E Consultant Fee: $1.2M Start/Completion Date: August 2006 - present From 2006 to present, GHD has been selected for three consecutive on -call contracts to provide waterfront engineering services to the Port of San Francisco. Efforts include engineering studies, and the design and rehabilitation of piers, docks, and other marine structures. Task orders have included: Dredging Inspection Services: GHD provided periodic inspections and observations of the dredging operations for the Berth 35 Area. Pier 431/2 Condition Assessment and Conceptual Repair Design: GHD performed condition surveys of the pier including all piles, bent caps, and stringers and decking. The structural condition report consisted of a detailed structural condition assessment and recommendations for repair. Pier 27 Cruise Ship Terminal: GHD provided technical advisory services for review of the cruise ship terminal project, specifically to analyze the effect of the new terminal building design on the existing pier substructure. GHD's marine structural engineers provided the Port of San Francisco input on the existing pier load capacities, present-day versus past building codes applicable to new and the past pier substructure retrofit construction, and present-day seismic code requirements with respect to deck level seismic design response spectra, present life -safety performance levels, and a seismic assessment of the existing pier. Relevant Project Tasks: Inspection and Structural Assessment; Public Access along Waterfront; Environmental; Plans, Specifications & Cost Estimates Relevant GHD Staff: Craig Lewis Repair of San Nicolas Island Pier, Naval Air Station Point Mugu, CA Owner: U.S. Navy Client/Contact: Reyes Construction, Scott Mothershed Phone: (909) 618-6461 Contract Amount: $35,000 Start/Completion Date: 2016 - In Construction GHD is providing engineering services in support of Reyes Construction for the inspection, structural calculations, and repair recommendations for the U.S. Navy supply pier on San Nicolas Island off the California coast. The 650-foot-long concrete pier is the only means for heavy equipment to be offloaded onto the island by sea and is located on an unsheltered stretch of beach exposed to significant wind and wave forces. Aspects of the repairs include improvements to the catwalks and access ladders, roll-on/roll-off ramp, barge fender system, and critical maintenance items such as the cleaning and painting of corroded steel elements exposed to the elements and replacement of worn pins, brackets, and fittings. Relevant Project Tasks: Inspection and Structural Assessment; Repair of Concrete in Marine Environment; Corrosion Mitigation; Plans, Specifications & Cost Estimates Relevant GHD Staff: Craig Lewis (PM), Robert Sherwood GHD I City of Huntington Beach HB -613- II Ocean Engineering & Professional Consult Item 16. - 140 Doolittle Drive Bay Trail Segment, East Bay Regional Parks, CA Owner: East Bay Regional Parks Contact: Mr. Toby Perry, Project Manager Phone: (510) 544-2302 Contract Amount: $600,000 Start /Completion Date: 2017/In Final Design GHD is providing survey mapping, geotechnical investigation, preliminary and final design, and CEQA/ NEPA and permitting services for implementation of this Bay Trail Segment project along the shoreline of the San Francisco Bay in San Leandro. In support of both design and permitting, a hydraulic/hydrology study is being prepared. As part of the study, GHD is researching and synthesizing current sea level rise projections to estimate the end -of -century sea level rise projection and expected water levels over the service life of the trail structure. Utilizing the existing FEMA coastal flood analysis and the projected subsidence from the geotechnical investigation, GHD is estimating the future coastal flood elevation. This will be important information for the design process, as it will define the top of walkway elevation, in preparation for sea level rise. In addition, the design of the trail structure will include appropriate materials (e.g. concrete, coated steel and timber, plastic) that require minimal maintenance and are suitable for the marine environment. Relevant Project Tasks: Public Access and Trails along Waterfront Promenade; Environmentally Sensitive Slope; Coastal Permitting; Marine Structural; Marine Recreation Elements Relevant GHD Staff: Craig Lewis (QA/QC), Brett King (Structural), Robert Sherwood (Waterfront/Civil) -- San Francisco West Harbor Marina Renovation, San Francisco, CA Owner: San Francisco Recreation and Public Works Department Contact: Ms. Mary Hobson, Capital Planning & Project Manager; County of Marin, Department of Public Works (Former Project Manager with San Francisco Recreation and Public Works Dept.) Phone: (415) 473-6519 Project Cost: $24.8M A/E Consultant Fee: $1.95M Start/Completion Date: March 2009 - January 2013 The San Francisco Marina Yacht Harbor, West Harbor Renovation Project consisted of the design of complete renovations for the 325-berth marina. The San Francisco Recreation and Public Works Department administers the marina and the project was funded by a loan from the California Department of Boating and Waterways. GHD prepared dredge design documents, permit applications, and a design -build criteria package consisting of plans and specifications for demolition of existing berths and construction of reconfigured berths in the West Harbor; upgrade of electrical and water dock utilities; installation of new barrier -free access gangways with security gates; construction of a new 300-foot-long concrete floating breakwater and an 185-foot-long cantilever sheet pile breakwater; repairs to the revetment; earthen mole removal; maintenance dredging; and improvement of the landside buildings. Relevant Project Tasks: Inspection and Structural Assessment; Public Access along Waterfront; Corrosion Mitigation; Plans, Specifications & Cost Estimates Relevant GHD Staff: Craig Lewis (PM), Jeff Knauer v -n 0 C 0 0 Z Item 16. - 141 GHD I City of Huntington Beach I HB-614-11 Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulting Services 15 z 0 Q U_ ILL Q 0 75 L.L n Z 0 V W U) Planning, Design, and Engineering Services at Pillar Point Harbor, San Mateo County, CA Owner: San Mateo County Harbor District Contact: Mr. John Moren, CMM, Director of Operations Phone: (650) 741-9163 Construction Cost: $3.5M (est.) Contract Amount: $780,000 Start Date: March 2007 Completion Date: December 2012 GHD provided the following key planning and preliminary design elements for the concept development of a promenade and seawall, 71 new small craft berths, maintenance, boat storage and haul -out facility, other improvements, and maintenance dredging at Pillar Point Harbor: • Berth Layout and Slip Distribution Study • Preliminary Design of Seawall and Promenade at Perched Beach • Dredging studies and preliminary engineering for new boat basin (to accommodate 71 new berths) and dredging the eastern breakwater area • Alternative Outer Harbor Dredging Scenarios for the outer harbor areas and outer harbor channels • Disposal/beach fill study for the Perched Beach area • Hydrographic Surveys • Storage, maintenance and boat haul -out feasibility study • Budgetary -level Cost Estimating, Project Scheduling • CEQA and Regulatory Agency Screening and Permitting Timeline GHD performed conceptual design of a new bulkhead for protection along the beach area, pedestrian promenade, dredging studies, and preliminary engineering for the new boat basin in the inner harbor to accommodate 71 new berths. The new berths will consist of concrete floating docks held in position by precast, pre -stressed concrete guide piles. The conceptual berth improvements included associated access gangways and utilities to accommodate commercial fishing and recreational boats. Maintenance dredging scenarios for the areas adjacent to the eastern outer breakwater at the Harbor and other areas were also developed. Dredged materials may be beneficially used to create uplands for parking and other amenities adjacent to the new boat basin, and as beach nourishment along an adjacent beach. The preliminary design and conceptual layout of the additional 71 berths and guest dock was an important aspect of the project. GHD worked closely with the District, Harbor staff and the California Coastal Commission to develop alternatives for the seawall and berth layouts that would be acceptable to both commercial and recreational boat owners. In addition, GHD has provided engineering and permitting to assist the Harbor District with dredging of sedimentation at the boat launch ramp and stabilization repairs to the shoreline and hillside adjacent to the coastal public access West Trail. Relevant Project Tasks: Site Planning; Public Access along Waterfront; Corrosion Mitigation; Plans, Specifications & Cost Estimates Relevant GHD Staff: Craig Lewis (PM) Pier 50 Structural Condition Assessment, Port of San Francisco, CA Owner: Port of San Francisco Contact: Mr. Joe Roger, Senior Project Manager Phone: (415) 272-2305 Contract Amount: $155,000 Start/Completion Date: 2012 GHD, under an as -needed engineering services task order with the Port of San Francisco, performed an above- and below -water structural condition survey of the Pier 50 substructure framing and piling. Additionally, GHD developed conceptual designs for structural repairs and potential seismic upgrades, and provided preliminary cost estimates for the conceptual work. As a part of the condition survey, the Pier 50 substructure framing and piling required above -water structural condition assessment from a boat under the pier. A topside visual survey of the deck was also included. As is typical, condition surveys were conducted in accordance with the MOTEMS standard (Chapter 31 F, California Building GHD I City of Huntington Beach j HB-615-11 Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulti Item 16. - 142 Code). GHD provided subsequent conceptual repair and potential seismic upgrade design along with cost estimates of the conceptual design repairs. A condition survey report was prepared with the results of the condition survey and material testing, and included the survey team's inspection report along with tables noting the location and extent of the damage observed on above -water portions of piles and deck substructure bent caps, as well as under -deck surfaces. Photos were included to document the damage observed during the survey. The report also featured recommendations for items observed that required immediate, short range, medium -range, and long-range attention by the Port. Relevant Project Tasks: Inspection and Structural assessment; Corrosion Mitigation Relevant GHD Staff: Craig Lewis (PM), Jeff Knauer NAVFAC-Apra Glass Breakwater Repair Design, Naval Base Apra Harbor Guam, Apra Harbor, Guam Owner: NAVFAC Marianas, Guam Contact: Glenn Camacho (Contract Specialist) Phone: (671) 333-2581 Project Cost: $4,650,000 A/E Consultant Fee: $165,000 Start/Completion Date: March 2011 - September 2012 GHD Inc., subcontracted to Overland — Black Construction Company, performed preliminary site investigations and generated design documents for a design -build repair of the Glass Breakwater located at Naval Base Apra Harbor, Guam. The breakwater repair site is approximately rectangular shaped, about 100 feet long along the breakwater extending up to 170 feet into the water measured from the centerline of the road on top of the breakwater. The repair consists of the installation of concrete cubes of two different sizes (4.8 feet and 6.0 feet), the heavier size cube to be located on the upper slope and a smaller size cube on the lower toe slope of the repair. GHD conducted a coastal engineering study to develop estimated return periods for various height waves at the repair location. This estimate was based on the local bathymetry developed during the design, and on assumptions for maximum wind speed, available fetch and other wave height limiting factors relative to the open -ocean wave approach angles. Modeling of the local topography above and below water was performed to identify local topography that may be impacting or amplifying the wave effects in the repair area. The results were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed repairs and to establish the risk of damage due to increased wave heights. Point Pinole Fishing Pier Structural Inspection, Richmond CA Owner: East Bay Regional Park District Contact: Mr. Nelson Lam, PE, QSD, Associate Civil Engineer, City of Berkeley, Dept. of Parks, Recreation, and Waterfront (formerly with East Bay Regional Parks District) Phone: (510) 981-6395 Contract Amount: $270,000 Start/Completion Date: 2016 East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) contracted with GHD to perform condition surveys of the Point Pinole Pier used primarily for recreational fishing. GHD provided structural evaluation and conceptual repair design for the fishing pier. The work consisted of a complete above - and below -water condition survey of the existing pier structure, a structural evaluation, and identification of pier components requiring structural repair to extend the usable service life of the structure. GHD performed an assessment of existing as -designed deck structure capacity to carry design basis loads. Conceptual repair alternatives were then developed to address structural deficiencies with respect to the demand produced by dead, live, and seismic loads and extend the usable service life of the recreational pier. Relevant Project Tasks: Inspection and Structural Assessment; Public Access and ADA Compliance; Plans, Specifications & Cost Estimates Relevant GHD Staff: Craig Lewis (PM) U) m 0 1 0 Z A _n 0 C \/ 0 Z Item 16. - 143 GHD I City of Huntington Beach HB-616-11 Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulting Services 17 (� REFERENCES Z GHD is proud of our reputation for providing quality 0 planning, design, and construction management Q expertise in all facets of project implementation. We encourage you to talk with our clients about our performance on recent similar projects. There is no H better proof of our work than direct testimonials. A J full 90 percent of our clients are municipal agencies Q or government entities, and approximately 75 percent of our work comes from repeat clients. This track 0 record illustrates our in-depth knowledge of specialized 75 engineering services and speaks to our clients' confidence in our ability to deliver a project from planning and implementation, through to completion. i Mansour Katany Orange County Parks 13042 Old Myford Road, Irvine, CA 92602 Z (949) 585-6428 OMan sour.Katany@ocparks.com Bay View Bridge Inspection and Repairs, Upper U Newport Back Bay Trail, CA (Nov 2016 - Sept W 2017): GHD conducted a scour analysis and structural U) assessment of an 84 foot long pedestrian bridge on the Bayview Trail at the Upper Newport Bay Nature Reserve The bridge is supported by two cast -in -place concrete abutments at the creek embankments with four timber piles. There was significant scour observed around the bridge abutments exposing some of the timber piles, and compromising the vertical and lateral capacity of the bridge. GHD produced a set of repair drawings to protect and maintain the stability of the abutments. Steven Bosiljevac, P.E., Regional Civil Engineer/Regional Dam Safety Coordinator; Pacific West Regional Office - San Francisco, National Park Service City/County of San Francisco Public Works & National Parks Service 2905 Hyde Street San Francisco, CA 94109 (415) 623-2272 steven_bosiljevac@nps.gov Municipal Pier at Aquatic Park, San Francisco, CA (2016): GHD performed a structural condition assessment and provided repair design alternatives for the San Francisco Municipal Pier to facilitate repairs. Our team conducted an above- and below -water visual inspection of the pier structure and the results were used to generate conceptual repairs and an associated construction cost estimate. Mr. Joe Roger, Senior Project Manager Port of San Francisco Pier One, San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 272-2305 joe.roger@sfport.com On -Call Waterfront Engineering Services Contract, Port of San Francisco, CA (Aug 2006 - Present): GHD has been selected for three consecutive on -call contracts to provide waterfront engineering services to the Port of San Francisco. Efforts include engineering studies, and the design and rehabilitation of piers, docks, and other marine structures. Task orders have included: Dredging Inspection Services; Pier 431/2 Condition Assessment and Conceptual Repair Design; Pier 27 Cruise Ship Terminal Scott Mothershed, Project Manager Reyes Construction 1383 S Signal Dr, Pomona, CA 91766 (909) 618-6461 smothershed@reyesconstruction.com Repair of San Nicolas Island Pier, Naval Air Station Point Mugu, CA (2016 - In Construction): Construction for the inspection, structural calculations, and repair recommendations for the U.S. Navy supply pier on San Nicolas Island off the California coast. The 650-foot-long concrete pier is the only means for heavy equipment to be offloaded onto the island by sea and is located on an unsheltered stretch of beach exposed to significant wind and wave forces. Aspects of the repairs include improvements to the catwalks and access ladders, roll-on/roll-off ramp, barge fender system, and critical maintenance items such as the cleaning and painting of corroded steel elements exposed to the elements and replacement of worn pins, brackets, and fittings. GHD I City of Huntington Beach I RFQ On -Call Ocean Enc HB -617- -ofessional Consulting Services 18 Item 16. - 144 GHD's project team has been assembled to be responsive to the City's needs, and to leverage the experience we've developed from a vast amount of similar projects. A key to the success of GHD is the fact that all of our principals are practicing project managers and project engineers. Each of these principals spends at least half their time designing projects for our clients. This ensures that all members of our team are contributing to the success of our clients and their projects. GHD's project team is also very cohesive, and the following section includes brief biographical sketches of each team member proposed. To complement our staffs qualifications, we are teaming with four (4) subconsultants for this contract. These firms include: VCS Environmental for environmental assessments, CEQA and NEPA documentation, permitting and agency coordination, and mitigation; Eurofins Calscience water chemistry and sediment testing; and Calvada Survey for hydrographic and topographic surveys; and AESCO for geotechnical investigation. Selection of these subconsultants was based on our past working relationship with each firm, and their ability to provide prompt, quality, responsive service. Below is an organizational chart that illustrates our team Bob Sherwood, PE Victor Tirado, PE Climate Change Brett King, SE Chris Trumbull, PE, GE Raymond Wong PHD, PE, Thomas Smith, PE LEED AP, SPESC Civil Engineer Site Stormwater/Hydrology Corrosion Engineer Development Larry Tortuga, PE Jeff Knauer, PE, ME Sarmad Farjo, PE Environmental Geotechnical Survey VCS Environmental AESCO CalVada Laboratory Testing Eurofins Calscience Grant Application Assistance Rebecca Crow m 0 i 0 Z e Item 16. - 145 GHD I City of Huntington Beach HB -618- 11 Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulting Services 19 0 _z LL LL Q n z O P: U W W KEY PERSONNEL Following are brief biographical sketches for our proposed key personnel as well as our support staff. Paul Hermann, RPEQ, Principal - in -Charge Mr. Hermann is a lead water/wastewater engineer in GHD's Irvine Water Division. He has extensive design experience in water and wastewater infrastructure, including large conveyance pipelines, pumping stations and treatment facilities. Paul is a seasoned leader and has served as Principal -in -Charge on multiple As -Needed contracts in Southern California, including the current on -call for San Diego Unified Port District, Port of Long Beach, City of San Diego, Orange County Sanitation District, City of Anaheim, among many others. Craig Lewis, PE, SE, QA/QC Manager Licenses: Structural Engineer, California S4765, Civil Engineer, California C58706 Mr. Lewis leads the project team as one of GHD's most experienced waterfront/coastal engineers and is very familiar with marina facilities, floating and fixed concrete, steel and timber marine structures, having over 20 years of experience designing for waterfront and offshore environments. Recently, Mr. Lewis successfully led a multi -discipline project team for the complete renovation of the 325-slip, San Francisco West Harbor Marina. This project included complete replacement of the floats, guide piles, gangways and ramps, utilities and two new breakwaters. He was also Project Manager, leading the design team for the new Brannan Street Wharf for the Port of San Francisco. Mr. Lewis is very familiar working with regulatory agencies for coastal and waterfront projects in California. Robert Sherwood, PE, Waterfront/ Coastal Engineering Lead License: Civil Engineer, California, C64351 Mr. Sherwood is a civil/waterfront engineer in the Irvine office with over 18 years of experience on a wide range of projects, including the design of harbors and marinas, waterfront promenades, bulkheads and shore protection, utilities and landside improvements, and harbor dredging projects. He has also been involved with the inspections of bridges, docks, and bulkheads. He has assisted clients with initial planning and feasibility studies and is typically involved with a project from the planning stages through design and to the end of construction. Recent Public Works experience includes: • Bay View Pedestrian Bridge (OC Parks) - Existing bridge inspection evaluation, repair drawings and construction support and observations • Marina Park (City of Newport Beach) - Marina basin,/ bulkhead, utility, dredging, beach nourishment, dock designfor new community sailing center • Alamitos Bay Marina (City of Long Beach) - Replaced over 2,000 boat slips, permit assistance, bulkhead rehabilitation, parking lot dredging and related landside utilities and other improvements • Dana Point Harbor Dredging and Boat Launch (County of Orange) - Engineer of record for maintenance dredging of harbor as well as the rehabilitation of the boat launch facility • Cabrillo Way Marina (Port of Los Angeles) - Perimeter bulkhead, marina, promenade, utility, and dredging drawings for the project, field inspections, value engineering, and construction support • Port of Hueneme Shore Protection and Waterfront Access (Oxnard Harbor District) - The reconstruction of over 3,000 feet of shore protection, as well as development of the adjacent land behind the slope for public access Victor Tirado, PE, Civil/Waterfront JJFM Engineer License: Civil Engineer, California, C78086 Mr. Tirado has over 17 years of experience in planning, engineering, and construction. His emphasis is in waterfront engineering, where he has successfully delivered complex transportation and multimodal infrastructure projects involving grade separations, bridge and roadway design, urban waterfront design and planning, recreational marina design, and site development, among other elements. GHD I City of Huntington Beach I RFQ On -Call Ocean En(HB -61 9—professional Consulting Services 110 Item 16. - 146 Raymond Wong, PhD, PE, LEED AP, CPESC, Coastal/Hydraulic/ Climate Change License: Civil Engineer, California, C67876 Raymond Wong has over 15 years of professional experience specializing in water resources, with technical emphasis on hydraulic and hydrology, flood management, urban wet utilities infrastructure planning and design, stream restoration, and Low Impact Development (LID). As a project manager who has proven to be very adept at guiding multi -discipline teams to deliver timely and high - quality services and deliverables to clients, Dr. Wong couples his varied and extensive technical background in urban flood management and restoration issues with his holistic leadership background to serve clients in all aspects of project development, managing the basis of and guiding study development. Brett King, SE, PE, Civil/ L-2 Structural Engineer Licenses: Structural Engineer, California S4867, Civil Engineer, California C64891 Mr. King has over 20 years of experience as a structural engineer in commercial, industrial, and marine structures. Mr. King is currently a member of the ASCE 61-19 Seismic Design of Piers and Wharves committee, developing modern seismic design criteria for marine piers and wharves. Christopher Trumbull, PE, GE, D. GE, Geotechnical Engineer Licenses: Geotechnical Engineer, California GE2492, Civil Engineer, California C53710 Mr. Trumbull has more than 28 years of experience with civil and geotechnical engineering. He is experienced in providing civil, geotechnical, and environmental consulting and project management services for a variety of clients throughout California. Mr. Trumbull also manages large and complex geotechnical projects, including transportation, public works, flood control, hydropower, essential facilities, military, correctional, power, industrial, ports, and other markets. Sarmad Farjo, PE, Civil Engineer/ Site Planning License: Civil Engineer, California C80769 Mr. Farjo has 25 years of extensive design and management experience with roadway design, roadway widening, intersection upgrade and widening projects, traffic control, traffic signals, signing and striping projects, major infrastructure projects for public utility companies/ agencies, and major land development projects for public and private clients. Mr. Farjo is also familiar with OCPW and local City standards as well as the latest Regional Water Quality Control Board Requirements. Larry Tortuya, PE, Hydrology/ Stormwater/Civil Engineer License: Civil Engineer, California, C71502 Larry has over 12 years of experience working within Riverside, Los Angeles, and Orange Counties on stormwater public improvement projects. Larry has managed multiple public projects requiring bio-filtration, bio-retention, harvest and reuse, and flood attenuation. Larry has experience in using the "Green Streets" approach to address LID and HCOC. Larry has worked on projects where innovative solutions such as bio-retention, stormwater harvest and re -use, and bio-filtration were implemented for stormwater design. Jeff Knauer, PE, ME, NACE CP Specialist, Corrosion Engineer Licenses: Civil Engineer, California, C68329; Mechanical Engineer, California, M31977 Mr. Knauer has extensive experience with corrosion risk assessment and mitigation design for various water related infrastructure and marine and offshore structures. Mr. Knauer has designed numerous cathodic protection systems and has been involved as the corrosion engineer and corrosion engineering design team leader for municipal and federal marine projects throughout the Western United States and the Pacific Islands. Mr. Knauer is licensed in civil engineering (CA, HI, WA), mechanical engineering (CA, WA) and is a NACE certified Cathodic Protection Specialist. Cn m 0 1 0 Z Aw 71 z G) Item 16. - 147 GHD I City of Huntington Beach I I HB -620- Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulting Services 111 Z O U W U) Rebecca Crow, PE, LEED AP, Grant Funding & Engineering License: Civil Engineer, California, C69664 Ms. Crow has over 18 years of experience in a broad range of environmental management and planning services: water and wastewater planning, water recycling, watershed and water quality modeling, regulatory compliance, funding assistance, and grant and contract management. She is adept at preparing applications for state and federal grant and loan programs and has secured over 40 million dollars in grant funds for communities in California. OUR SUBCONSULTANTS We have reviewed the upcoming needs of OCPW and carefully selected our subconsultants to provide specialized services in support of GHD's staff. We have worked extensively with each of the consultants listed below. VCS Environmental (VCS) VCS Environmental is a full service environmental consulting firm founded in 1996. VCS brings a diverse range of qualifications with decades of experience to provide expert solutions to each and every project — whether related to project entitlement, CEQA/ NEPA, wetlands restoration, biology, jurisdictional waters and wetlands regulations or cultural resources. Services offered include: Preparation of CEQA/NEPA Documents / Regulatory Permits and Wetlands/Waters Delineations • Prepare/process California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents and public presentations and technical translation of CEQA/NEPA documents to stakeholders • Coastal Zone Consistency Determinations and delineation of wetlands and waters of the U.S. and State • ACOE - Army Corps of Engineers, Section 404 permits • CDFW - California Department of Fish & Wildlife, Section 1602 agreements • RWQCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board, Section 401 certifications and Waste Discharge Requirements • EPA 404(b)(1) alternatives analyses • Coastal Development Permits (CDPs) Habitat Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting • Habitat Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Plans (HMMP) and mitigation site design • Biological monitoring during construction • HGM and CRAM analyses • Mitigation Banking Cultural Resources • Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and Historic Property Survey Report • Area of Potential Effect mapping and Historical Resources Evaluation Reports • Archaeological Survey Report and Native American coordination and cultural monitoring Biological Mapping, Endangered Species Surveys and Reports • Vegetation mapping and conservation easements • Focused surveys for endangered species • Biological technical reports and biological assessments and Endangered Species Act Section 7 consultations • Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, surveys, reports, and HANS process ;tieurofins I Eurofins Calscience has I Calscience been providing quality analytical services to consultants, private industry and government agencies since 1986. Eurofins Calscience is located in Garden Grove, California, but our clientele extends nationwide, and even overseas. Our facilities, instrumentation and staff have continued to expand over the years, adding capabilities and capacity to meet the demands of our clients and new regulatory drivers. We are a full -service environmental testing company, offering analysis of groundwater, sea water, sediment, storm water, soil, hazardous waste, tissue and vapor/ambient air. Eurofins Calscience maintains state- of-the-art instrumentation systems for all operations. Calvada's long-standing CAL VRDA standing philosophy has SURVEYING INC been to utilize the most advanced surveying GHD I City of Huntington Beach I RFQ On -Call Ocean EntHB -621-professional Consulting Services 112 Item 16. - 148 technology available to produce highly accurate results for its clients, and set the standard for excellence within the surveying industry. Because of this, Calvada has developed an outstanding reputation for providing timely, high quality service. Communication, Coordination and meeting Timelines are key elements when performing our land survey. Calvada's management team will communicate on a weekly basis the GHD's project managers to ensure that the survey tasks are met according to the proposed timeline and budget. Communicating the plan of action and relaying the information to Calvada's staff proved to be an efficient strategy to reduce cost and time in the field and the office effort. Calvada's managers will sit with GHD's project managers to discuss the final deliverables and to ensure that delivery of what was promised on the date that it was promised is accomplished. An example of the firm's clients includes CALTRANS, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, U.S. Navy at Port Hueneme, U.S. Navy at Seal Beach, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, and Federal Highway Administration. Calvada Surveying is a MBE, SBE, DBE, and DVBE certified company. Calvada Surveying has an excellent relationship with many local agencies and looks forward to work together on this and future projects. AESCO is a woman -owned corporation I (incorporated in California) and has been in operation since 1993. AESCO's laboratory AEsao is certified by DSA, Caltrans and City of Los Angeles. AESCO has been involved in a number of projects involving QA/ QC construction materials testing and inspection, environmental and geotechnical engineering for various clients including the Cities of Los Angeles, Costa Mesa, Inglewood, Long Beach, Diamond Bar, Lakewood, Lynwood, Riverside, Buena Park, Irvine, Santa Ana, the Los Angeles Unified School District, Alhambra School District, SANBAG, Caltrans, Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA), and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). For the past 15 years AESCO has been retained by the City of Huntington Beach to perform geotechnical and environmental engineering services and construction support for various roadway projects throughout the City. Illil#!i':311(If€€ 11( +1 .I31t% 11 1—1 ilF:.i;� —IE—' It l l!Ill' llfl Till i lill.:11M1:11!1 lilt Ii771Yt111fill] I lilt 1111 lit t IIf1:iila;= IE 111, IEE 111=­�111 illt W;Ills 1111 1111111 -011 IIII II1t11M, Its! ,ill �III:i11J1 III fi{ .iltlili 115F��lil hills ll!Itlll UNDERSTANDING & METHODOLOGY City staff has priority maintenance and capital improvements projects to get completed, often with limited budgets and schedule constraints. To help the City meet their goals, GHD has developed a comprehensive approach to coastal zone and waterfront projects that takes advantage of our multidiscipline staff. Through listening to our clients' needs and building on past projets, we are able to continually improve our project delivery system. The following approach would be customized for each project we undertake with the City of Huntington Beach. Key Issues and City Objectives Our approach was developed to address the key issues and City objectives related to the on -call contracting vehicle used on various waterfront and coastal zone projects, based on experience completing engineering projects for City/County Public Works Departments charged with the management of recreational and public facilities and the infrastructure that supports them. • Coastal and Waterfront Projects are often located in Residential or High Public Use Areas. Most City facilities are located in areas of high public use and repairs to these facilities need to be cost-effective and minimize restrictions for public use and impact to environmental resources. GHD's design solutions for these facilities will emphasize low impact construction methods and equipment that can be utilized to develop a balance between City and contractor needs, public use, property owner concerns and environmental protections. • No "Off -the -Shelf' Design Solutions. Coastal projects are unique and because we are a multidiscipline firm, our waterfront and coastal engineers and scientists have regular working contact with other disciplines and can anticipate site -specific issues (like environmental, corrosion, geotechnical or structural concerns). (I m 0 1 O Z u Item 16. - 149 GHD I City of Huntington Beach I I HB -622- Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulting Services 113 C� 0 J 0 0 W 06 z_ l� z Q U) rr W z n Z 0 W U) • Multiple Disciplines often Required to Complete Small Projects: Projects associated with waterfront sites may likely require coordination with multiple engineering disciplines. GHD's approach takes advantage of our depth and breadth of resources, which helps assure that we have both appropriate design details and can bring customized engineering solutions to the project when necessary. • True Project Delivery often Requires More than Design: Successful project delivery depends as much on communication as design skills. Projects often benefit from an early needs assessment with the client, where opportunities to maximize the project value can be discussed. Typical Project Approach For the purposes of this illustration, we have chosen to highlight how we approach a design project. We have divided our typical approach to a project into the following three major components: Project Initiation Project Execution wpo. Closeout Each of these project elements is discussed in the following sections. Project Initiation Project initiation is one of the most critical phases of a project. Although there can be a strong desire to "get working" and produce some results, it is absolutely essential that the effort be orchestrated from the outset for a successful outcome. Project initiation often includes the following steps: • Development of a detailed scope, budget, and timeline by GHD's Project Manager • Identification of project milestones and deliverables • Defining roles and responsibilities of team members and benchmarks for tracking success • Establishment of a communication pathway for proper distribution of information • Setting up the QA/QC plan for the project • Developing a design and construction budget to meet the needs of the City As part of our project initiation phase, we develop a detailed Project Memorandum that outlines in detail the overall plan for the execution of the project. A detailed GHD's project a prcac emphasizes practical, Proactive design, Pst'ructjon, and Itir ` t ate " _. scope, budget, and schedule are included with the Project Memorandum which is reviewed with the client so that there is mutual understanding of the undertaking and roles and responsibilities of the client and consultant. We also conduct a project kickoff meeting that includes the key team members and the client. where overall project objectives and constraints are reviewed, as well as the schedule and deliverables. Project Execution Project execution is a careful combination of production of work products; coordination of individuals and subconsultants; and management of resources, budget, and time. Some projects may be divided into several logical phases, such as the following: • Phase 1: Site Reconnaissance • Phase 2: Alternatives Evaluation and Preliminary Design • Phase 3: Final Design, Specifications, and Cost Estimating • Phase 4: Bid Support • Phase 5: Construction Support, Inspection and Management Depending on the nature of the project, we may not provide all of these phases, or we may provide some additional work. Our typical approach to each of these phases is described in the following sections as an example. Phase 1: Site Reconnaissance This is one of the most important phases of a project and is used to define the characteristics of the project and scope of work, with the following consideration: • Site constraints, construction equipment access or potential limitations • Availability of existing reports, records, plans and utility maps GHD I City of Huntington Beach I RFQ On -Call Ocean Enc HB -623- -ofessional Consulting Services 114 Item 16. - 150 • Potential for geologic or structural instability (unstable seawall, coastal embankment or slope revetment, shoreline protection, landslides, etc.) • Potential for hazardous materials contamination • Public access constraints or use restrictions • Condition of any existing facilities, structures, and supporting foundations We consult with local City staff when possible since their experience can provide a wealth of information. Reconnaissance -level investigations are used to identify issues and develop a detailed approach to of the project. A memorandum summarizing the findings and our opinion of the potential implications of the findings is prepared to help guide the project. Phase 2: Alternative Evaluation Very few projects have no alternatives, and there are often various ways of achieving the overall project objectives. Sometimes there may be several major alternatives for a project (vertical seawall or bulkhead versus rip rap rock revetment) while other times there may be many minor options that the client can make based on cost, timing, and preference. It is important that alternatives be developed in sufficient detail so that the client can make important choices. GHD will typically work with the client throughout this investigation phase and prepare a summary report outlining the costs and benefits of various project alternatives. From this evaluation, we work with the client to select the approach that best meets the project and community objectives. Phase 3: Final Design, Specifications, and Cost Estimating We will complete the final project design, specifications, and cost estimate in a phased approach. Typically, we provide 50% (permitting level), 90% (preliminary), and 100% (final) design submittals. At each phase, we will review the submittal with the client and can make corrections and adjustments to refine the design as it progresses to help avoid any surprises during the process. Phase 4: Bid Support Our services during bidding depend on the contracting procedure of the client, and we typically conduct a pre - bid conference, review contractor questions during the bid phase, issue addenda to provide clarifications, and assist the client in evaluating bids. Phase 5: Construction Support, Inspection and Management We provide a full range of construction inspection and management services that include: • Preconstruction conference • Constructing surveying and staking • Review of shop drawings, submittals, and contractor pay requests • Site inspections and soil/materials testing • Preparing change orders and daily logs • Final punch list walk through, testing, and final inspection We manage our projects using our detailed procedures manual, which provides a detailed accounting of the flow of documents, requests, and instructions to the contractor. GHD's procedures help the City and contractor proceed based on clear instructions meeting the intent of the plans and specifications and that there is a clear documentation of what transpired at every step of the construction project. Project Closeout Finishing a project correctly is just as important as starting a project correctly. GHD project closeout procedures include preparation of final Contract Record Documents that are a summarization of construction contractor records of changes made during construction that materially differ from what is shown on the plans. All electronic data in the form of documents, spreadsheets, data files for models, drawings, and survey data is compiled into a standardized filing system that can be retrieved from one source when needed. U) m 0 1 0 Z v i C z M DO W D z 0 z D PO K m 0 0 0 ^0 G) Item 16. - 151 GHD I City of Huntington Beach I IHB -624- Ocean Engineering & Professional Consulting Services 115 Hs -625- Item 16. - 152 0 Robert (Bob) Sherwood, PE Waterfront Engineer Qualified: Bachelors of Science in Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 1999; Old Dominion University, Coastal Engineering Certificate Program, Norfolk, VA, 2011; Registered Civil Engineer: CA #64351 Connected: Past Chairperson of ASCE Los Angeles, Harbors & Waterways Technical Group; Past President of UC Irvine Chapter of Chi Epsilon, Engineering Honors Society Professional Summary: Mr. Sherwood is a civil/waterfront engineer in the Irvine office with 18 years of experience on a wide range of projects, including the design of boat docks and marinas, boat launch ramp facilities, plazas and promenades, bulkheads and shore protection, utilities and landside improvements, and harbor dredging and lake restoration projects. He has also been involved with the inspections of bridges, docks, wharves, and bulkheads both above and below water. He has assisted clients with initial planning and feasibility studies including obtaining grants for waterfront facilities, and is typically involved with a project from the planning stages through design and to the end of construction. Project Manager/Engineer Sunset Aquatic Marina I Goldrich Kest Huntington Harbor, CA Mr. Sherwood was the project engineer in charge of layout, construction documents, permitting, and construction support services for a 240-slip marina in Huntington Harbor. Marina improvements included the reconfiguration of several docks to reflect the current trends in boating toward wider and larger boats, incorporating an ADA accessible gangway, and a vessel pumpout station. Project Engineer Doolittle Drive Bay Trail Segment I East Bay Regional Park District I Oakland, CA Responsible for design of the boat launch ramp and a portion of the adjacent Bay Trail. Currently in design, approximately 2,500 linear feet of the new trail will be a pile -supported concrete pedestrian walkway along the San Leandro Bay shoreline; the remaining 1,000 lineal feet will consist of the restoration/upgrade of existing trail including a new trail crossing through the existing Martin Luther King Shoreline boat ramp parking lot. This parking lot crossing will be located to facilitate passage of users and improve safety. Project Manager/Engineer Alamitos Bay Marina I City of Long Beach This design -build project involved various waterside and landside improvements in seven different yacht basins. Key elements of the project included the replacement of 1,625 boat docks, inspection and rehabilitation of the existing bulkheads, promenade and railing, basin dredging, gangways, utility upgrades, repaving of parking lots, landscaping, and renovation or replacement of 13 restrooms. Additionally, a new 10,500 square foot eelgrass planting area was constructed to mitigate for disturbing existing eelgrass beds during harbor dredging and keep the project in compliance with the requirements of the various permitting agencies. As the engineer of record, Bob's responsibilities included coordinating the drawings for all disciplines on the project, field inspections, value engineering, and permitting and construction support. Project Manager/Engineer Marina Park I City of Newport Beach, CA Mr. Sherwood was the engineer responsible for the waterfront aspects of the Marina Park project which encompassed a 10.5-acre site and involved the new construction of a public park; a 24,000-square-foot Community and Sailing Center building; a 23-slip marina; a reconstructed 19th Street restroom building; a freestanding playground lighthouse feature; themed playground; outdoor fitness circuit; parking lots; and frontage street improvements. Coordination with the landside elements of the project and placement of beach quality sand and dredge material in accordance with the agency permits was key to the success of this project. Project Manager/Engineer Dana Point Harbor Dredging I County of Orange, CA Mr. Sherwood was the engineer responsible for construction documents, permitting support, and cost estimates related to the dredging of Dana Point Harbor. The dredging project included the beneficial reuse of sandy material on adjacent beaches both inside and outside of the harbor. Approximately 80,000 cubic yards of dredge material were relocated during the project, which was completed on time and within the estimated budget. Item 16. - 153 HB -626- 0 Paul Hermann Principal -in -Charge Qualified: Bachelor of Engineering — Civil, Environmental, Queensland University of Technology, Australia Connected: Institution of Engineers, Australia Professional Summary: Mr. Hermann is the lead water/wastewater engineering and Principal for GHD's southern California operation. He has extensive design experience in water and wastewater infrastructure, including large conveyance pipelines, pumping stations and treatment facilities. Paul is a seasoned leader and has served as Principal -in -Charge on multiple As -Needed contracts in southern California, including the current on -call for San Diego Unified Port District, Port of Long Beach, City of San Diego, Orange County Sanitation District, City of Anaheim, among many others. Owner Engineer/Project Manager GRIP AWTF WRD I Lakewood, CA OE and Project Manager for WRD's Groundwater Reliability Improvement Program (GRIP) $100-million advanced water treatment facility (AWTF). The Progressive DB delivery of the project has very unique aspects including a collaborative process to select the DB Entity and establish a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). Lead the development of the project design criteria which communicated all technical requirements to the DB Entities in a creative format to facilitate submittals of proposals, the collaborative discussions, and the evaluations of the proposals. The selection of the DB Entity with a single GMP was completed in April 2016, and final contract is currently being prepared. The project is scheduled to be completed mid-2018. Project Director Desalination Plant, Poseidon Resources Carlsbad, CA Currently performing the owner's engineer role for the project, which comprises the engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) of both the 50 million gallons per day (MGD) seawater reverse osmosis desalination facility, in addition to approximately 10 miles of new 54-inch steel conveyance pipeline. He is the primary contact for the owner's team with respect to technical services and has and continues to provide general oversight and independent assessment of various aspects of the project. Some of the tasks completed to date include project and site coordination activities, scope book and specification reviews, drawing and design reviews, materials / durability / asset life reviews, consultation with local authorities and utilities, and providing general project management and technical assistance to the client. Works include the coordination and development of compliance documentation with the California Department of Public Health, and Pilot Plant development, compliance and oversight. Principal -in -Charge Strategic Infrastructure Management I Port of San Diego Principal overseeing the complete targeted data collection (new field data and currently held as-builts and condition survey reports), asset register development, risk -based preventative maintenance and renewals plan, long-term financial forecast and budget optimization strategy for all Port owned and maintained waterfront, parks, roads and building assets. Private Client, Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant in the Lanai, Hawaii. Currently performing the role of Project Manager for GHD on this project. The private client has engaged GHD as part of the project team for the design and construction of a seawater reverse osmosis desalination facility with the plant to be developed in 2.5 MGD stages, to an ultimate capacity of 10 MGD. • GHD's current role includes key components of the desalination project, including the following: • Pilot Plant design and construction guidance, and analysis; • Analysis of numerous contract vehicles, and the determination of the optimal option noting the key criteria of location, plant size, seasonal demand requirements and constraints, development / retail sale opportunities, etc. • Design of the treatment process, including the coordination with the Department of Health, and chemical usage considerations. • Cost benefit analysis of different processes, in terms of both upfront capital and ongoing long term operation & maintenance expenditure. • Power supply requirements, • GHD is the Designer of Record for the seawater reverse osmosis treatment process. xB -627- Item 16. - 154 0 Craig Lewis, PE, SE QA/QC Manager Qualified. B.S. Civil Engineering, UC Davis, 1991 Relevance to project. Craig Lewis has more than 23 years of experience with the design and analysis of structural and multidisciplinary engineering elements for infrastructure, coastal, and utility systems. He has served Ports and other coastal entities throughout the West Coast, from NAVFAC SW in San Diego to the Ports of San Francisco and Oakland, to Submarine Base Kitsap in Washington, providing rehabilitation of existing waterfront facilities and design of new marine structures. Craig also has direct experience with design details, both new construction and repair/retrofit, as well as with various design codes and standards including ASCE, ACi, CBC, MOTEMS, PIANC and API. Project Engineer As -Needed Architectural and Engineering Services Contract I Port of San Francisco, CA Marine structural engineer for several as -needed task orders including Structural Assessment of Port Mooring Bollards, Pier 50 Valley Substructure Repair and Pier 43.5 Promenade Conceptual Design. Project Manager San Nicolas Island Pier I San Nicolas Island, CA Project Engineer for the design of a new pier and off-loading facility at San Nicolas Island. Responsible for the design of a movable 280-foot steel bridge ramp. The purpose of the ramp is to be lowered into position so the Navy supply barge can conduct roll on -roll off operations from the fixed pier. Designed the ramp for towing in the open ocean to the job site from the fabrication plant. Also performed non -linear analyses and design of the breasting and mooring dolphin structures and concrete support piles. Project Manager Brannan Street Wharf Project I Port of San Francisco, CA As Project Manager, he led the structural assessment and visual condition surveys of existing Pier 36 and marginal wharf structures, along with conceptual engineering design of structural alternatives for new and retrofitted wharf and seawall. Led development of seismic design criteria for new structures and performance based seismic analysis and design of new wharf pile and deck structure. Project included structural analysis and conceptual design of wharf structure components for operational and code prescribed seismic loads, quantity take offs and cost estimates, and design drawings and specifications. Structural Engineer Wharf Improvements I NCBC Port Hueneme, CA Provided structural design for replacement of wood piling and fendering systems with plastic - composite systems made from recycled plastic. Performed a full berthing analysis for a range of vessels to determine the design of the fendering system to provide the Navy with a facility capable of supporting several classes of ships. Designed repairs for damaged load -bearing piles supporting the wharves, vessel mooring equipment and other wharf components. Structural Engineer Mission Bay Shoreline Protection for Bayfront Park I Coast & Harbor Engineering, Port of San Francisco, CA Mr. Lewis developed a shoreline protection design for the Mission Bay Bayfront Park Project for the Port of San Francisco. The project rebuilt approximately 1,500 linear feet of shoreline and slope with a stone revetment with foundation improvements to the seawall. Services included a structural site condition assessment, a hazardous materials assessment, assistance in the preparation of design Structural Engineer Ferry Plaza and Pier 27/29 1 Port of San Francisco, CA Responsible for seismic analysis and repair to two large piers; designed an innovative lateral -force - resisting repair system to avoid need for new pilings. Work included series of detailed non -linear time -history seismic analyses including non -linear hysteretic response of the soil and batter pile connection. Item 16. - 155 HB -628- Victor Tirado, PE Waterfront Engineer Qualified: San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, BS Applied Arts and Civil Engineering. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WN, Docks and Marinas Connected: San Diego Transportation Development Association (formerly San Diego Highway Development Association) Board Member, ASCE Transportation Sub -committee Past Chairman Professional Summary: Mr. Tirado has over 17 years of Construction and Consulting engineering experience focused on staff management, planning, engineering, and construction. His emphasis is in waterfront engineering, where he has successfully delivered complex marine and multimodal infrastructure projects involving port facilities, subsea infrastructure, dredging, and recreational marina design among other elements. Victor's General Contracting and international experience is an instrumental resource of knowledge in the development of projects. Victor is also a 6-year veteran of the U.S. Navy. Project Engineer Huntington Harbour Subsea Waterline, Huntington Beach, CA, USA Responsible for the engineering design, assistance with permitting and CEQA compliance and construction support services for the installation of 700 feet, 16-inch HDPE subsea potable water main across one of the busiest navigational channels of Huntington Harbour in the City of Huntington Beach. The installation of this water main was necessary to improve regional redundancy and reliability for the City of Huntington Beach potable water system. Mr. Tirado led the team that combined the installation of this water main together with the Huntington Harbour Maintenance Dredge project (a separate project lead by M&N for the County of Orange) realizing significant savings to both, the City and the County. Project Engineer Hueneme Beach Shore Protection, Port Hueneme, CA Obtained emergency permits and long-term regulatory permits for rock revetment shoreline protection. Supported development of CEQA document. Supported coastal engineering analyses (wave uprush study) and prepared the engineering bid package and provided engineering support during construction. Senior Civil Engineer Colorado Lagoon Restoration, Long Beach, CA, USA Senior Civil Engineer with oversight on the preparation of final construction documents for the Colorado Lagoon Restoration Project. The project included three major storm ocean outfalls and the cleaning of an 800' tidal culvert. Colorado Lagoon is surrounded by an urban neighborhood and serves as a watershed basin as well as a recreational and habitat area. It is connected to the Alamitos Bay and Pacific Ocean through an underground tidal culvert. There were several challenging issues to address, including contaminated sediment dredging within the lagoon, water quality problems, history of flooding in the area and, the potentially conflicting objectives of stormwater management, public recreation, and habitat restoration. The project included three marine outfalls, one 17,OOOcf wet well, two pump stations, three diversions systems and the cleaning of an 8001f culvert. Civil Project Manager Portside Pier, San Diego, CA Project Manager for all civil improvements for the Portside Pier Project. The project entails the replacement of an existing restaurant on an old 24,000 square foot pier composed of a timber deck with concrete pile. The project will replace the structure with a new concrete pier and new superstructure. The Brigantine's newest opportunity, Portside Pier, at San Diego's spectacular Embarcadero will renew the legendary waterfront dining experience and return the magical essence of water meeting land that innately draws people near to our stunning harbor. The restoration of the docks below which will once again provide a tranquil mode of passage leading directly to Portside Pier on the embarcadero. Civil Engineer Alamitos Bay Marina, Los Angeles, CA, USA Developed the design of Basin 4 and provided quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the overall reconstruction project, which involves the replacement of all docks and piling in Basins 1 through 7. Alamitos Bay Marina boasts 1,624 slip with full service, pump outs and secu rity. HB -629- Item 16. - 156 =` Raymond Wong, PhD, PE, LEED AP, CPESC QA/QC Qualified: Ph.D. Environmental Planning, University of California, Berkeley, 2014; M.S. Environmental Engineering — Environmental Fluid Mechanics and Hydrology, Stanford University, 2002; B.A.Sc Honor in Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Toronto, 2000 Connected: American Society of Civil Engineers San Jose Branch — Past President; Floodplain Management Association; American Geophysical Union; Licensed Civil Engineer: CA; USGBC LEED Accredited Professional; Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control Professional Summary: Raymond Wong has over 14 years of professional experience in the Bay Area, specializing in water resources engineering, with technical emphasis on hydraulic and hydrology, flood management, urban wet utilities infrastructure planning and design, stream restoration, and Low Impact Development (LID). As a project manager who has proven to be very adept at guiding multi -discipline teams to deliver timely and high -quality services and deliverables to clients, Dr. Wong couples his varied and extensive technical background in urban flood management and restoration issues with his holistic leadership background to serve clients in all aspects of project development, managing the basis of and guiding study development, for example, or overseeing efficient and clear deliverables. Dr. Wong has acted in several key roles for drainage plans, analyses, and studies. Hydraulic Engineer / Geomorphologist Doheny Desalination Project I South Coast Water District, CA This project site is located in a FEMA 100-year floodplain and is adjacent to the coast. As the project hydraulic engineer to assist the preliminary project design and planning, we synthetized available floodplain and coastal analysis data and findings to develop preliminary planning guidance and design concepts to manage onsite flooding and coastal impacts. In addition, in reference to the California Coastal Commission Coastal Development Permit guidance, we analyzed the project site and incorporated flood management planning for the projected sea level rise scenarios.. Hydraulic Engineer Grant Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation Project I City of Novato, CA Developed a HEC-RAS hydraulic model for the creek corridor at the vicinity of the bridge to evaluate creek water surface elevation under various design flow conditions. Also prepared a scouring analysis to evaluate potential scouring issue at the bridge and along the creek corridor, especially at the upstream of the bridge where the creek alignment made a sharp turn to the bridge. The scouring analysis provided information to develop creek bank erosion protection options, and define bridge foundation design based on projected creek bed and sediment mobilization trends. Lead Hydraulic Engineer Lower Berryessa Creek Improvement Project I Santa Clara Valley Water District Milpitas, CA This project is to evaluate improvement alternatives at the Lower Berryessa Creek, to protect the City of Milpitas from the 100-year storm event. As the lead hydraulic engineer, my team is responsible for the hydraulic analysis to evaluate the sensitivity of different improvement components within a wide range of alternative scenarios and creek alignment options. Based on the analysis results, a series of design criteria including the levee crest elevation, channel geometries, and railroad culvert sizing were recommended for the improvement design. The study results also revealed the need to improve downstream conveyance at the Lower Penitencia Creek in order to avoid backwater induced flooding at Lower Berryessa Creek. Hydraulic Engineer Mendocino County Courthouse Project County of Mendocino I Ukiah, CA Evaluated Gibson Creek flood stage in a 100-year storm event in the vicinity of the project area, and the potential impacts of the proposed roadway bridge crossing to upstream creek water surface elevation. We developed a HEC-RAS hydraulic model for the creek. The model included significant overbank floodplain for 100-year floodplain mapping. The project also included a bridge scouring analysis to establish the bridge foundation design criteria. Item 16. - 157 HB -630- Page 1 0 Brett King, PE, SE Marine Structural Engineer Qualified: B.S. Civil Engineering, Oregon State University, 1994. Connected: American Institute of Steel Construction; American Society of Civil Engineers. Professional Summary: Mr. King has over 20 years of experience as a structural engineer in commercial, industrial, and marine structures; work that has involved the use of non -linear, displacement based seismic design techniques. Mr. King is currently a member of the ASCE 61-19 Seismic Design of Piers and Wharves committee, developing modern seismic design criteria for marine piers and wharves. His structural experience encompasses the design of industrial boiler buildings, turbine generator foundations and enclosures, pulp and paper mill structures and foundations, liquid fuel storage tank foundations, chemical process industries structures, and marine dock structures. Senior Structural Engineer Marine Terminal Dock Design Millennium Bulk Terminals, Longview, WA Mr. King provided analysis and design for the marine bulk ship loading dock on the Columbia River. The 2000-ft-long pile -supported dock was designed to support up to two ship loaders that could load two Panamax sized bulk cargo vessels. Design requirements included the use of non- linear design methods. The dock was heavily influenced by lateral spreading of the river dike embankment. Professional Services: $350K Construction Value: $5MM Senior Structural Engineer WETA Richmond Ferry Terminal Conceptual Design I WETA I Richmond, CA Mr. King served as Senior Structural Engineer for the planning, layout, and preliminary design of a new passenger ferry terminal at Ford Point in Richmond, California. The new terminal will consist of a concrete float secured with steel pipe guide piles, large dolphin piles, and an ADA- compliant access ramp and movable gangway. The project includes electrical, water, data, and a security system for the new terminal. Senior Structural Engineer Water Storage Tanks I Guam Waterworks Authority, Guam Mr. King provided analysis and design for multiple cast -in -place concrete water storage tanks up to 1 million gallons each. Tanks were designed to meet AWWA D110 standard for prestressed concrete water tanks. Challenges included designing for extreme high seismic loading. Professional Services: $100k Construction Value: $3MM Senior Structural Engineer/Lead Portland Bulk Terminals I Canpotex, Ltd., Portland, OR Mr. King oversaw the structural design team for the expansion of Canpotex's potash ship loading terminal at the Port of Portland's Terminal 5. The project included replacement of the aging ship loader, which required seismic evaluation of the existing marine dock. The project also included the addition of a +100,000-square-foot bulk potash storage building, multiple conveyors, transfer towers, and bents. Professional Services: $4MM Construction Value: $75MM Senior Structural Engineer/Lead Reserve Center I Washington National Guard, Everett, WA The AFRC project consists of two buildings, a Training building and an Organizational Maintenance Shop totaling about 160,000 square feet of new construction. Specific role was to provide design and detailing for structural connections, review of project documents and consulting for the use of rammed aggregate piers used to resist foundation loads. Senior Structural Engineer Bulk Material Rail to Ship Terminal Millennium Bulk Terminals, Longview, WA Mr. King performed structural design for new rail to ship bulk shipping terminal. The project included a deep pit rail unloading structure, overland conveyors, transfer towers, and bulk surge bin structure. Design of structures accounted for significant liquefaction related settlements and lateral spreading. Integration of the onshore design with dock and trestle accounted for significant changes to lateral spreading displacements across the site. Professional Services: $2MM Construction Value: $50MM HB -6 31- Item 16. - 15 8 0 Project Engineer Thomas Smith, PE Project Engineer Qualified: M.S. Civil Engineering (SDSU) 2014; B.S. Structural Engineering (UCSD), 2009. Registered Professional Civil Engineer in the state of California #C84009; license issued: June, 2015; license expires: September, 2019. Connected: Active member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), San Diego Section. Professional Summary: Thomas Smith has 8 years of civil/structural engineering design, project management, and construction management experience with commercial public building projects, pipeline projects, building mechanical system projects and pump station projects. He has participated in both new construction projects as well as tenant improvement projects. He is familiar with various building codes and the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. Well #1 House I Huntington Beach, CA Dec. 2016-Oct. 2017 Structural designer for a new reinforced masonry building with a wood -frame roof. Also provided the design for reinforced concrete footings for the well head and various equipment placed inside the new building. Project Engineer Feeder #2 1 Huntington Beach, CA Aug. 2017-Sept. 2017 Provided structural design for new reinforced concrete thrust blocks and thrust walls to secure a replacement water pipeline. Design included sizing the pipe wrapper and ring plate and their connections to the new pipeline. Project Engineer Leachate Injection Well Improvements Pasco County, FL April 2017-Nov. 2017 Structural designer for three concrete slab -on -grade footings designed to support landfill leachate transfer pumps and treatment equipment. Provided a design for a free-standing steel canopy to be installed over one of the concrete slabs. Structural Design Reviewer WRD GRIP Advanced Water Treatment Facility I Pico Rivera, CA Oct. 2016-Present As the owner's engineer, reviewed and provided input on the design -builder's design of a new 45,000 square foot masonry treatment building, 12,000 square foot structural steel administration building, 23,000 square foot underground reinforced concrete equalization tank, and various reinforced concrete site improvements. Project Engineer Johns Manville Cooling Tower Stand Assessment I South Gate, CA July 2017-November 2017 Provided structural analysis and structural design recommendations for a new cooling tower support stand to be installed at the Johns Manville manufacturing facility in South Gate, CA. The analysis also included anchorage recommendations to secure the stand and a water tank to an existing concrete slab. Project Engineer Otay I" and 2nd Valve Building Modifications I San Diego, CA May 2017-Nov 2017 Performed a field structural assessment of an existing historic masonry building followed by preliminary structural calculations for the removal of an interior wall. Generated a preliminary design report for the owner to review the necessary actions required for the project to proceed with wall removal, as well as requirements imposed by the structure's Historic designation. Item 16. - 159 H B -6322- Christopher Trumbull, PE, GE, D.GE Technical Support Qualified: M.S. Civil Engineering (Geotechnical emphasis), San Jose State University, 1995; B.S. Civil Engineering, San Jose State University, 1989; CA Professional Geotechnical Engineer; CA Professional Engineer; NV Professional Eng; OR Professional Geotechnical Eng; HI Professional Eng (inactive); Academy of Geo-Professionals Diplomate of Geotechnical Eng. Connected: Member, Association of State Dam Safety Officials and American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE); Attended ASDSO Dam Safety Conference in San Diego, 2014 Professional Summary: Mr. Trumbull has more than 29 years of experience with civil and geotechnical engineering. He is experienced in providing civil, geotechnical, and environmental consulting and project management services for a variety of clients throughout California and the western US. Mr. Trumbull also manages large and complex geotechnical projects including flood control, transportation, public work, essential facilities, power, and other markets. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Creek Flood Control Project I USACE Los Angeles District Santa Paula, CA Sr Geotechnical Engineer responsible for leading the team conducting a variety of geotechnical tasks to support levee improvements. Work included excavating test pits in the channel to evaluate existing bed materials for scour analyses; subsurface exploration in difficult coarse - grained conditions for evaluation of the existing levee structure; and a Geotechnical Design Documentation Report summarizing recommendations for under seepage mitigation, slope stabilization, and floodwalls. Geotechnical evaluations included seepage, stability, liquefaction, seismic deformation, and floodwall stability. Lead Geotechnical Engineer Los Cerritos Stormwater Capture Facility I City of Signal Hill I Long Beach, CA Lead Geotechnical Engineer for this design -build project within the Long Beach Airport. The project included a 26- foot deep, 670' by 120' stormwater detention basin and other deep structures to provide additional stormwater capacity and removal through infiltration. Challenges included varying materials for infiltration, foundation support, and lateral earth pressures as well as detailed soil stress analysis for aircraft loading over the facility. Work included an access road to support 737 aircraft. Plans and specs were developed using FAA AC 150/5370-10G; subgrade and new flexible pavement section were designed using FAA AC 150/5320-6E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer/Project Manager Arden Parallel Force Main Geotechnical Investigation I SRCSD I Sacramento, CA Sr Geotechnical Engineer/Prof Manager responsible for geotechnical investigation for approximately 10,400' of 60- inch diameter sanitary sewer force main. Most of the alignment was installed through open cut techniques; however, the alignment crossed below a levee of the American R. requiring jack and bore techniques and crossed a reach of the river requiring microtunneling. Tunneling below the river, managing the regional and local groundwater, dense gravel and cobbles, and shafts on the order of 60' deep presented the largest challenges. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Arden Pump Station Geotechnical Investigation I SRCSD I Sacramento, CA Sr Geotechnical Eng. responsible for geotechnical investigation for a seismic upgrade of portions of a pump station and a new standby power bldg. Existing fill, equipment vibrations, and liquefactions were of concern. Work included presenting parameters for earthwork, shallow foundations, retaining walls, and pavements. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Flood Control District Princeton Basin Levee Certification I County of San Bernardino Ontario, CA Sr Geotechnical Engineer responsible for leading the team performing a geotechnical engineering study to support FEMA certification (Title 44 CFR 65.10) for this flood control basin. Work consisted of subsurface investigation; laboratory testing; geotechnical analyses to include slope stability, seepage, liquefaction, and settlement; and reporting. The evaluation and certification of levees is based on design criteria (freeboard, closures, embankment protection, embankment and foundation stability, settlement, and interior drainage), operation plans and criteria (for closures and interior drainage), maintenance plans and criteria, and the actual certification requirements (i.e. as-builts, forms, documentation, and data). Tasks included development of a criteria summary and project financial accountability. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Davenport Recycled Water Project I Davenport County Sanitation District I Davenport, CA Senior Geotechnical Engineer responsible for leading the Geotechnical team. The District needed to expand their existing facilities to included recycled water treatment, storage, and distribution facilities. The project included a new storage pond with embankments up to 12 feet above grade and up to 25 feet below grade, open trench pipeline and a trenchless crossing of SR1. Exploration included several borings at the proposed pond and pipeline area. Specific analysis included embankment seepage and slope stability under static and seismic conditions. HB -633_ Item 16. - 160 0 Sarmad Farjo, PE, CP, M.ASCE Transportation Qualified. BE in Civil Engineering. 1991 Connected. Harvard Business School - Leadership Program Certificate, Member of California Board of Professional Engineers, Member American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Member of American Public Works Association (APWA), Member American Society of Engineering Management (ASEM), Member of Institute of Sustainable Infrastructure (ISI), Member Institute of Professional Engineers New Zealand (MIPENZ) Relevance to project. Mr. Farjo has 25 years of extensive design and management experience with roadway design, roadway widening, intersection upgrade and widening projects, traffic control, traffic signals, signing and striping projects, major infrastructure projects for public utility companies/agencies, and major land development projects for public and private clients. Mr. Farjo is also familiar with the City's standards as well as the latest Regional Water Quality Control Board Requirements and has experience dealing with regulatory agencies and Caltrans for permits. Contract Manager On -Call Engineering Services I UC Irvine Medical Center Project Manager for the on -call multidisciplinary engineering services. Manage and direct the following projects/task orders: - Master Site Utility Plan ($1,300,000) - Chiller Plant Program ($240,000) - Energy Plant Program ($220,000) - Trash Compactor Area Relocation Design ($35,000) Total engineering value is $4,000,000 over 3 years Project Manager E. Broadway Improvements I City of Long Beach, CA Project manager for a 2 mile segment of East Broadway in the city of Long Beach to create a multi - modal street that will improve overall mobility and the quality of life for residents in the area. Project Manager Master Site Utility Plan University of California Irvine Medical Center I Orange, CA 2014, GHD Project manager and the Lead Civil Engineer for the master planning and design of a $800 million, 30- acre full service medical center campus. Responsible for the planning, execution and the design of all site, civil and infrastructure including grading, water, sewerage stormwater, gas, power, communication, chilled water, steam as well as the construction support for the project. Responsible for managing the preparation of two Design -Build programs for Central Chiller Plants (GHD's engineering fee of $4 million, project construction cost of $800 million). Project Manager Paramount Petroleum Refinery, Paramount, California, USA Manage and lead the civil design team in the series of Visioning Charrettes to gather the initial data and come up with a program and a conceptual design to resolve the site problems. The outcome was used as a basis to prepare a master plan for the refinery, which included additional buildings and parking lots to serve the facility. The site is approximately 60 acre site along Downey Ave in Paramount California with approximately 250 employees and a throughput of approximately 54,000 barrels of capacity a day which is one of the biggest in California as well as the Western states. Al Bahr Camp Site I Mt. Laguna, CA 2014, GHD Project director for the design of a 22- acre site development for the camp redevelopment after the fire in 2013. Responsible for coordinating with the client and the project manager to ensure all activities progress in time and within budget. (Civil engineering fee of $1.1 million, construction cost of $10 million). Item 16. - 161 HB -634- 0 Larry B. Tortuya, P.E. Storm Water Project Manager Qualified. B.S., 2004, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona A.S., 2000, Engineering, Long Beach City College Connected. Professional Engineer - Civil, California, 2007, 71502 Relevance to project. Mr. Tortuya has experience in the design of flood control systems, ecosystem and wetlands restoration, erosion control, LID and HCOC design for storm water quality compliance, hydrologic/hydraulic modeling, flood plain management, and storm drain site design. He has experience in the design of backbone storm drain infrastructure, water quality, and large scale drainage projects including reservoirs, dams, levees, and flood attenuation basin design. He is an expert in AutoDesk Civil 3D software. Project Manager Storm Water Quality Management Plan Review On -Call I City of Oceanside, CA Currently acting as Project Manager of Storm Water Quality Management Plans (SWQMPs) Review On -Call with the City of Oceanside Engineering Division for projects subject to the current San Diego Region NPDES MS4 Permit. Also developed, in conjunction with the GHD team, the City's BMP Design Manual and Storm Water Quality Management Plan templates to comply with the current permit. Additional responsibilities include City staff permit compliance training, consultation with CIP staff for evaluation of current/future projects. Project Manager MS4 NPDES Permit Compliance Support Services On -Call I City of Anaheim, CA The City of Anaheim is required to develop, implement, and refine programs identified in the Orange County's Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). Collectively these programs are referred to as Stormwater Permit Compliance Programs. As the permit evolves, the re -issuance often requires refinement to the permit requirements. This project includes providing the City of Anaheim with adequately trained and competent managers, administrative and data management staff to assist the City in interpreting the requirements and refinements in the NPDES Permit or permit compliance programs assist with data collection, and submittals to Orange County and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Tasks also include assisting the City with grant applications, and design of innovative approaches to water quality compliance, such as regional BMP implementation. Task Manger Hydrology and Hydraulics Report/Plan Review On -Call, City of Buena Park, CA Oversee reviews for the City of Buena Park of H&H plans, studies, and other exhibits submitted for entitlement application of new or re- development projects to conform to the Orange County Hydrology Manual and design standards. Technical Design Lead Barranca Channel Improvements City of Tustin/Irvine I Irvine, CA, USA Improvements to Barranca Channel were done as part of a street widening project for Barranca Parkway with the Tustin District development. This project included the removal of a rock lined channel along the edge of Barranca Parkway, and replacement with an underground RCB system. The project required the coordination with multiple municipalities, developers, and agency stakeholders to provide the approval and construction of the channel within a very aggressive schedule. Both the Cities of Irvine and Tustin were clients for this channel improvement project. Task Manager PA 39 - NTS Basin, Irvine Community Development Company I Irvine, CA, USA Responsible for the supervision of plan, specifications, and estimates for the PA-39 Natural Treatment System. Roles included support during construction, plan processing through the City of Irvine, and overseeing the design of the system, including the water quality. Consultant provided NTS and water quality treatment design, hydraulic modeling, and grading layout of the NTS basin. HB -635- Item 16. - 162 Jeff Knauer, PE, ME, NACE CP Specialist Corrosion/Cathodic Protection Qualified: M.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of California, San Diego; B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles Registrations CA Civil, C68329. CA Mechanical, M31977. HI Civil, 15589. WA Mechanical, 50938. WA Civil, 50938. NACE CP Specialist, Cert. No. 9181. Connected: Subject Matter Expert for Civil Engineering — California Board of Professional Engineers; Chapter Board of Directors (2008-2010) — Concrete Repair Institute, Northern California; NACE Institute International Certification Review Committee (2015-present); National Association of Corrosion Engineers; Bay Area Water Works Association; San Francisco Post Officer (2016-present) - Society of American Military Engineers. Professional Summary: Mr. Knauer has extensive experience with corrosion risk assessment and mitigation design for municipal, private and federal infrastructure. Mr. Knauer has served as the corrosion engineer for condition assessment and rehabilitation projects throughout the Western United States and the Pacific Islands. Mr. Knauer is licensed in civil engineering (CA, HI, WA), mechanical engineering (CA, WA) and is a NACE certified Cathodic Protection Specialist. Mr. Knauer has experience with design of corrosion control solutions in challenging environments and is an accomplished task leader for large scale corrosion assessment and rehabilitation projects and provides expert witness services. Corrosion Engineer/Assessor Port -Wide Corrosion Engineering Services Port of San Francisco I San Francisco, CA, USA Port -wide corrosion engineering and assessment services for corrosion control, cathodic protection and protective coating for ferry terminal floats, piles, piers, moorings and associated Port Infrastructure. Development a Port -wide corrosion operations and maintenance manual. Program Manager As -Needed Corrosion Engineering Services I San Francisco Public Utilities Commission I San Francisco, CA, USA Program Manager for a 3-year 1 M as -needed corrosion engineering contract encompassing services including field survey and cathodic protection design. Senior Corrosion Engineer Carlsbad Desalination Plant Shut Down Assessments I Poseidon Water I Carlsbad, CA, USA Senior Corrosion Engineer for the cathodic protection system assessments for systems installed on plant infrastructure as a part of the first annual plant shut down. Corrosion Control Design Team Leader P1-102 Plant 1 Upgrade Project I Orange County Sanitation District I .Fountain Valley, CA, USA Corrosion Control Design Team Leader for Orange County Sanitation District as part of 170M Secondary Activated Sludge Facility 2 at Plant No. 1 Project. Corrosion Engineer National Park Service Muni Pier at Aquatic Park I San Francisco, CA, USA Corrosion Engineer for the comprehensive assessment and development of rehabilitation concepts for Municipal Pier at Aquatic Park. Program Manager Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant City of San Jose I San Jose, CA, USA Program Manager for multi -year corrosion engineering services and design contract to assess, maintain and upgrade corrosion control infrastructure. Corrosion Engineer Mission Bay Force Main Relocation I San Francisco Public Utilities Commission San Francisco, CA, USA The project included galvanic cathodic protection design for both 66-inch dielectrically coated welded steel pipe and 66-inch reinforced concrete cylinder pipe portions of the relocated force main. Lead Corrosion Engineer Campus -Wide Utility Fitness for Service Evaluation Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA, USA Lead Corrosion Engineer for a campus wide -utility infrastructure Fitness for Service Evaluation to assess the risk of corrosion related failure and design of impressed current cathodic protection systems for corrosion control of utility piping. Item 16. - 163 HB -636- 0 Rebecca Crow, PE, LEED AP Grant Funding & Financing Qualified. B.S./Environmental Resources Engineering/Humboldt State University/1997 Registered. Professional Engineer: Civil CA #C69664 Relevance to project. Ms. Crow has over 18 years of experience in a broad range of environmental management and planning services including water and wastewater planning, water recycling, watershed and water quality modelling, regulatory compliance, funding assistance, and grant and contract management. Ms. Crow is adept at preparing of applications for numerous state and federal grant and loan programs and has secured over 40 million dollars in grant funds for communities in California. Ms. Crow will be in charge of grant funding and financing for community projects, providing as -needed assistance with grant applications and compliance so that critical improvements can be successfully completed. Funding Facilitator/Coordinator Rohner Creek Flood Control and Habitat Improvement Study I Rohner Creek The objective of the study was to analyze the Rohner Creek watershed and identify potential improvements to reduce the frequency of flooding events along the Rohner Creek channel. Flood reduction improvements analyzed included channel widening and terracing with habitat improvements, diversion pipelines, and detention basins. Facilitated $3.9 million in grants from two DWR grant programs. Project Manager Luffenholtz Creek Source Water Protection Project I City of Trinidad, CA Led this sediment reduction project from initial grant application submittal through project completion. The project was constructed on private property for the benefit of the City's water system. Project included construction of two new roads with extensive excavation, grading, and subgrade development, development of a quarry, installation of two pre -manufactured bridges, and installation of numerous erosion and sediment control BMPs. Facilitated $1.7 million in Proposition 50 grant funding through the SWRCB. Project Engineer Techite Pipeline Retrofit Project I Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District (HBMWD), Eureka, CA Developed a detailed cost benefit analysis to show the value of replacement of a poor quality techite waterline in support of a FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant. Attended a three-day FEMA workshop on performing cost benefit analyses under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. The District project was funded and completed in 2015. Project Manager / Funding Facilitator ASBS Stormwater Project I City of Trinidad, CA The project included six separate stormwater collection, treatment, and infiltration systems utilizing low impact development technologies. The objective of this project was to improve the water quality of the watersheds on the Trinidad plateau that ultimately drain into Trinidad Bay. Oversaw preparation of the successful grant application and provided ongoing grant management support. Responsible for planning (including an extensive geotechnical field study and groundwater model), CEQA oversight, preparation of final Plans and Specifications, bid period assistance, and construction support. Project Manager Caltrans District 1 Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment I HCAOG, CA Served as project manager for a district wide climate change vulnerability assessment and adaptation plan led by Caltrans and the Humboldt County Association of Governments (HCAOG). The project involved performing climate change vulnerability assessments at four prototype sites in Del Norte, Humboldt, Mendocino, and Lake Counties. The GHD team developed an adaptation planning tool and then used it to develop adaptation strategies to mitigate the effects of climate change impacts such as sea level rise, storm surges, and temperature change. Project funded in part by a $200,000 grant from the Federal Highway Administration. HB -637- Item 16. - 164 Director I CEQA/NEPA Services EDUCATION Master of Urban and Regional Planning, California Polytechnic University Pomona, 2014 Master of Arts in Geography, California State University, Fullerton, 2011 Bachelor of Arts in History, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2006 VCS TEAM MEMBER SINCE 2016 CERTIFICATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), since 2015 SPECIALIZED TRAINING Wetland Delineation, Wetland Training Institute; 2013 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association (APA), Member Since 2011 Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), Member Since 2012 Adjunct Professor at California Polytechnic University, Pomona and California State University, Fullerton in Urban Planning and Geography Departments A certifies DBE, SBE & WBE firm ABOUT VCS Environmental EXPERT SOLUTIONS CEQA-NEPA . Biology. Regulatory Sean Noonan joined VCS Environmental (VCS) in 2016, previously working as an environmental planning consultant with Parsons focusing on road, highway, and transit projects in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. As a Senior Project Manager with VCS, Sean leads the development of environmental documents and regulatory permits for a wide array of project types throughout Southern California, and currently leads environmental compliance for several projects during final design and construction. SELECT PROJECTS PALM SPRINGS SIGNALIZATION PROJECT I CALTRANS LOCAL ASSISTANCE I PALM SPRINGS, CA Prepared and processed the Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) form. Managed the development of environmental technical studies in support of a CE/CE. SR-91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT I RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA In support of the environmental compliance manager for this project, Sean drafted all regulatory permits, prepared several reevaluations/revalidations, tracked/ensured compliance with environmental commitments and permit conditions, drafted supporting technical studies, prepared supplemental jurisdictional delineations, developed an HMMP for coastal California gnatcatcher, drafted the Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Project (DBESP), developed a wildlife fencing plan, and conducted nesting bird surveys in support of this roadway project along SR-91 in Riverside County. SR-91/SR-71 INTERCHANGE PROJECT I RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA In support of the lead environmental planner on this project, Sean led the preparation of the project's 401, 404, and 1602 permits, met in the field with regulatory agency representatives, conducted supplemental jurisdictional delineations, peer reviewed all biological technical studies, assisted in the preparation of an EA/FONSI for geotechnical borings in support of the project, and prepared many of the GIS mapbooks used in the project's regulatory permits. CAJON PASS PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT I SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CA This project included the preparation of revalidations and supporting technical studies for a Design -Build pavement rehabilitation project in the Cajon Pass (San Bernardino County). For this project, Sean was the lead environmental planner, and was responsible for tracking and maintaining environmental compliance with MMRP and permit conditions, managing the project's environmental scope/budget/schedule, subconsultants, and internal staff. 1-15/RANCHERO ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT I HESPERIA, CA This project included the preparation of permits and ensuring environmental compliance for a new interchange project in Hesperia. For this project, Sean was the lead environmental planner, and was responsible for obtaining all permits, tracking and maintaining environmental compliance with the project's MMRP and permit conditions, managing the project's environmental scope/budget/schedule, subconsultants, and internal staff, and closing out permits at the end of construction. 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 949.489.2700 1 vcsenvironmental.com Item 16. - 165 HB _638_ AESCO Proposal No. P5604 Statement of Qualifications Adam Chamaa Engineering Manager, M.S.C.E., P.E., G.E. Registered civil and geotechnical engineer with over 25 years of experience as geotechnical engineer and quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) manager. Responsible for QC/QA engineering for new construction, foundations, sewer installations, roadway surfaces during and after installation, design of de -watering systems, pump stations, and assessment of soil -related environmental contamination. Provided geotechnical design recommendations for new construction for municipal, governmental and commercial projects throughout California. Specific Project Experience Beach Boulevard Water Main Extension Project -City of Huntington Beach and Caltrans Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for the extension of a water main on Eastbound Beach Boulevard between South Warner Avenue and Robidoux Drive and West Beach Boulevard to East Beach Boulevard at Holt. The testing and inspections included the placement of all structural fill and backfill, concrete testing and inspection, subgrade and base placement and compaction, asphalt paving construction (base and surface layers), and slurry backfill. l---------- - - - - -: ! fi ! Education: ! Al.5. Civil ' ! Engineering, ° Geotechnical and ° ! Highlvay Design; ' ° Louisiana Technical ! ! University, Ruston, LA, 1985. ° B.S., Civil ! Engineering, ' Louisiana Technical ° i ' University, Ruston, ! Louisiana, 1982 ' � Registrations: ! ° California A,o. C53992 E (Civil) ' ° California No. C2784 ! ° (Geotechnical) Nevada No. 022245 ' ° (Civil) ! ! l----- ° Pavement Design - Central Net Fire Training Facility, City of Huntington Beach Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for a geotechnical investigation to evaluate the existing pavement at the Central Net Fire Training Facility (Gothard Street Fire Station). Borings were performed and logged and laboratory testing was conducted to determine the condition of the subgrade and to provide recommendations for repair of the existing concrete pavement. Recommendations were provided for new pavement structural sections which would support the 73,000-pound, 60 foot long with a wheel base of 249 inches fire trucks. Yorktown and Ward Street Improvements — City of Huntington Beach Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for the geotechnical report for approximately two miles of roadway to evaluate the condition of existing pavement structural sections. Borings were performed and logged and laboratory testing was conducted to determine condition of the subgrade. Construction recommendations were provided for ten and twenty year life for new pavement structural sections and/or overlaying of the existing pavement. Roadway Improvements -Slater Avenue, Heil Avenue — City of Huntington Beach Engineering Manager: Mr. Chamaa was the Engineering Manager for the materials testing and inspection during the rehabilitation and pavement reconstruction of several roadways in the City of Huntington Beach. The testing and inspection serviced included a review of the concrete mix designs, concrete testing and inspection, rebar inspection, aggregate testing, subgrade testing and inspection, base material evaluation and testing, asphalt batch plant inspection, and asphaltic concrete testing. Construction Material Testing/ Inspection , Environmental and Geotechnical Engineering Services 0 I 1 age u i E d i u g rf osc e z i c a www.AescoTech.com HB -639- a ° `� e Item 16. - 166 Armando DuPont, PLS SURVEYING, INC. Expertise: Mr. Dupont started his career in the surveying industry in 1977. As President and founding member of CAL VADA, he is responsible for all business activities of the company including executive management of technical, field, engineering, design and land survey personnel. His project experience includes topographic mapping, boundary surveying and analysis, ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys, construction and control surveying, preparation of tract and parcel maps, earth work calculations and quantities, and targeting and control for photogrammetry observations. Mr. Dupont is fluent in managing commercial, industrial and governmental as well as private sector projects. He leads a team of professionals at CAL VADA providing insight and leadership based on his years of experience as a Party Chief, Project Surveyor and Project Manager on a wide array of projects. He has provided work for a number of industries, including providing services to the engineering, telecommunications, transportation, environmental and real estate industries. Relevant Experience: Cycle 7 Citywide Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Enhancements — Moreno Valley, CA February 2016 GHD — Sarmad Farjo, 949-585-5239 1 sarmad.farjo@GHD.com Mr. DuPont served as the lead surveyor for the detailed topographic survey of Perris Blvd., Alessandro Blvd. and Brodiaea Ave. (2,660 linear feet) for design purposes. This included detailed cross sections of the major streets surrounding the site. It also included topographic information of all the curbs, gutters, flow lines, sidewalks and all visible utilities. The topographic survey also included contours that were utilized by the design group to aid in the design. Project also included boundary analysis based on the provided title report, plotting existing easements and creating street dedication legal descriptions and exhibits. The scope also included the detailed survey of 36 Ramps spread out throughout the City of Moreno Valley. The topographic surveys included contours in Civil3D that were utilized by the design group to aid in the design of ADA compliant ramps. Topographic Survey of Public Right of Way — San Juan Capistrano, CA April 2017 GHD — Sarmad Farjo, 949-585-5239 1 sarmad.farjo@GHD.com Mr. DuPont served as the lead surveyor for the topographic survey for ADA engineering purposes. A detailed topographic survey of the 33 ramps for design purposes and 3 miles of public right-of-way was completed under the supervision of Mr. DuPont. The topographic map included an aerial survey of all the streets within the project site. It also included detailed topographic information of all the curbs, gutters, flow lines, sidewalks, buildings and all visible utilities. The topographic survey included contours in Civil3D that were utilized by the design group to aid in the design of ADA compliant ramps. Item 16. - 167 1113-640- Resume City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department 2000 Main Street Tel. (714) 960-8820 ADDENDUM NUMBER ONE For RFQs — Water, Plan Check, Ocean, Architectural, Transportation, Construction Management, Materials, Civil in the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH November 29, 2017 Notice To All: City of Huntington Beach has extended the due date from January 4t'', 4:00 pm 2018 to January 11t'', 4:00 pm 2018 for eight (8) Request For Qualifications (RFQ) for various professional services (Water, Plan Check, Ocean, Architectural, Transportation, Construction Management, Materials, Civil). This is to acknowledge receipt and review of Addendum Number One, dated November 29, 2017. Company Name By Date All bidders must acknowledge and include the receipt of this Addendum with your RFQ packages. CC1392, Addendum No. 1 Page 1 H B -64 1- Item 16. - 168 r 'tFB 17, 149B. P REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON -CALL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SERVICES ADDENDUM 2 Public Works Department CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Released on November 28, 2017 Compliant with Federal and State Grant Requirements Per LAPM, Chapter 10 Dated January 2017 and Exhibit 10-C, Dated August 2017 Addendum released on December 18, 2017 tern 16 _ - 16Q A. MATERIAL TESTING RFQ QUESTIONS & RESPOSNES Question 1 References to ASTNI shall be ignored Provide a qualified technician as necessary to conduct density tests as required. The tests will be performed with a nuclear densometer in ^eeer-d nee with ^ STM P2922 or sand cone-4" aeeer-danee with n ST-N4 r„ 556. Maximum density curves (^ ST 4 D155-7 will be performed on various material types as they are encountered. Question 2 No chances Per Item 4, the maximum density tests shall be performed in accordance with ASTM D1557 which is a laboratory test, while per Item 10; maximum density test shall be performed at jobsite. Please clarify if the test shall be performed in laboratory or at jobsite, and if at jobsite, what test method shall be used. WATER ENGINEERING RFQ QUESTIONS & RESPOSNES Question 1 Section 5E: Request is that "proposers shall concurrently submit a detailed cost proposal fbr all services and materials anticipated to complete the work"... Question: Detailed scope is unknown at this time so we really can't submit a detailed cost proposal. Does the next portion of the sentence clarify what you expect? The sentence that Jill referred to is incomplete, as the latter part of the sentence states "and/or professional service rate sheet in a separate envelope. " Question 2 Section 5E (continued from above):..."arid/or professional service rate sheet in a separate envelope. Costproposals shall include all personnel by classification, hours, and hourly billing rate." Question: This we can provide for 2018 work in the form of an hourly rate schedule for "all personnel by classification." We can also provide an escalator of some percentage for future 2019 and 2020 work. Will that be acceptable to meet the requirements of 5E? This section does not restrict the consultant to submit an escalator. Question 3 Briefly, what work has been done to date on design for Well 14? City will not be responding to this question, as this is an on -call contract, and this project already issued to an existing on -call consultant. Question 4 Briefly, what is the description of construction (and engineering) work for Well 9 and Peck Reservoir Dual Drive? u R _ra ; _ Ttem 16_ - 171 Question 5 Do you have an on -call hydrogeologist or a qualified list of hydrogeologists? City does not have a qualified list of hydrogeologists. We also don't specifically have an on -call hydrogeologist, however, we do have on-cousuitants that may have in-house expertise, or have subcontracted with a hydrogeologist. Question 6 Do you have an on -call geotechnical consultant or a qualified list of geotechnical consultants? City= does have several existing on -call geotechnical consultants, but this round of RF'Q is also soliciting for this discipline. Question 7 Do front cover, tabs/dividers, and/or back cover count in the page limits? These sheets do not count in the page limits. Question 8 Does an 1 1 x 17 page count as one page or two? 1 page. C. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING RFQ QUESTIONS & RESPOSNES uestionl Can the Contract be modified to conform the Professional Services indemnity provisions of Senate Bill 496 which modifies CA Code 2782.8 relating to indemnity and design professionals and is effective as of Jan 1, 2018? City is not currently familiar with Senate Bill 496, but will investigate to determine if City's existing contract complies with state law. Question 2 Will the City accept insurance policy deductibles of $25,000? This discussion will take place once a consultant is selected for final contract negotiation. There is no guarantee City will accept insurance policy deductibles of $25,000. if the consultant is inflexible in this requirement, it must he stated in the proposal. Question 3 Does the selected consultant need to provide potholing services, or will the City staff perform potholing services? Typical project scope of work may include a task order for potholing services. Consultant may at that time sub out that task order if it cannot be fulfilled in-house. City staff does not typically perform potholing services for a consultant. Question 4 Do the sub consultants need to complete Exhibit 10-H and Exhibit 10-Q? The DBE goal for this discipline is 2%. if sub consultants are identified in the proposal to achieve the 2% DBE goal, then the subs should also complete applicable forms. Item 16. - 171 H B -644- D. ON CALL CIVIL ENGINEERING RFQ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Question 1 The RFQ states that consultants are required to complete ALL attached Caltrans forms in Appendix D and include in the proposal. Can you please clarify which forms we should/should not include, if any? Also can you please confirm which forms must be completed by both Prime and Sub consultants: All forms as listed are required to be completed by the Prime. The DBE goal for this discipline is 21%. If sub consultants are identified in the proposal to achieve the 2% DBE goal, then the subs should also complete applicable forms. Exhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet Exhibit 10-H Sample Cost Proposal (Example 1) Actual cast -Plus - Fixed or Lump Sum (Firm Fixed Price. Contracts) Exhibit 10-II Sample Cost Proposal (Example 2) Specific Rate of Compensation (Use for Ors -Call or As -Needed Contracts) Exhibit 10-II Sample Cost Proposal (Example 3) Cost per Unit of Work Contracts Exhibit 1—K Consultant Certification of Contract Costs and Financial Management System Exhibit 10-01 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment Must DBE participants be certified Caltrans DBEs? Exhibit 10-02 Consultant Contract DBE Commitment. If this form is required, how do we address the distribution instructions? Exhibit 10-Q Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Exhibit 17-F Final Report -Utilization of Disadvantage Business Enterprises (DBE) and First -Tier Subcontractors E. OCEAN ENGINEERING RFQ QUESTIONS & RESPOSNES Question 1 Item 9.B under Professional Liability Insurance states that "Consultant shall notify City of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims." Does this requirement apply only to projects performed by the Consultant for the City, or does it apply to all projects performed by the Consultant for any client? Projects performed by the consultant for the City. HB -645- Item 16. - 172 Question 2 A professional liability insurance deductible that is higher than what is provided in the City's standard professional services agreement was accepted by the City in the recent past. Would a higher deductible be acceptable once again? This discussion will take place once a consultant is selected for final contract negotiation. There is no guarantee Cite will accept insurance policy deductibles of S25,000. If the consultant is inflexible in this requirement, it must be stated in the proposal. Question 3 A requirement to provide a list of sub consultants is not explicitly specified in the RFQ. However, reference to sub consultants is made in the Assigned Representatives paragraph under Section 8: General Requirements. Are we to provide a list of potential sub consultants (e.g., surveyor, diver, geotechnical drilling, utility potholing, etc.) as part of the SOQ, or is a complete list required only at the time of contract or project award? This is at the discretion of each consultant. At the time when an actual project is identified for out -sourcing, this will be specified at that time by the consultant. Question 4 Is the organization chart considered a chart (i.e., not counted towards page limit), or does it count towards the page limit? Under Section 5 of Proposal Format Guidelines, charts are not counted toward the page limit. Question 5 Based on the RFQ Firm Qualifications requirements, we understand that a summary of key staff and their qualifications will be included in the main proposal section (15 page limit), and detailed resumes of these personnel will be placed at end of the SOQ (separate 15 page limit). Is a table of key staff summary qualifications considered a table (i.e., not counted towards page limit), or does it count towards the page limit? Under Section 5 of Proposal Format Guidelines, tables are not counted toward the page limit. Question 6 Is a table of representative projects considered a table (i.e., not counted towards page limit), or does it count towards the page limit? Under Section 5 of Proposal Format Guidelines, tables are not counted toward the page limit. Question 7 Does the 1.5x line spacing requirement apply to resumes inserted at the end of the proposal, or is single spaced text acceptable for such resumes? Under Section 5 of Proposal Format Guidelines, 1.5x line spacing does not apply to resume, and only apply to the letter or proposal sections. Question 8 Are 1 lxl 7 sheets considered to be one page or two pages? Counts as a single page. Item 16. - 173 HB -646- Question 9 Do covers count towards the page limit? Under Section 5 of Proposal Format Guidelines, cover letter is 2 pages maximum, and not part of the page lirnit. Question 10 Do section dividers count towards the page limit? No. Question 11 Based on the RFQ Staffing requirements, does the City require copies of professional engineering licenses, PMP certificates, QSD certificates, and any other licenses or certificates listed for key personnel be included in the detailed resume section? This is at the discretion of each consultant. Question 12 Do these license/ certificate copies count towards the page limit for resumes? No If so, will exceeding the recommended page limit to provide the requested documentation negatively impact the proposer's elevation scoring? N/A Question 13 A cost proposal is now required. It is our understanding that this cost proposal will only provide our billing rate schedule for the key personnel listed as well as rates for support staff and all materials/ equipment we provide. Is this assumption correct? Yes. Does the City desire that we provide a 3-year billing rate schedule or simply state what the billing rate escalation will be per annum (e.g., X.Y% per year)? Both are acceptable. Question 14 Is it acceptable that billing rates for sub consultants be provided at the time of contract or project award? If a sub consultant is included in the proposal, then billing rates will need to be included. Question 15 Shall the electronic PDF proposal copy be submitted on a USB drive or CD/DVD as part of the hard copy submittal to the City Clerk's Office, or shall the PDF copy be submitted via Planet Bids? Refer- to Section 6.b, Submission of Qualifications Package. F. ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING RFQ QUESTIONS & RESPOSNES Question 1 Do proposals from Architects need to include an Engineering consultant(s)? If so, what engineering disciplines are required? This is at the discretion of each consultant. HB -647- Item 16. - 174 Question 2 How many firms/teams is the City looking to award the On -Call contract(s)? City will finalize exact number of consultant contracts at a later time. Currently City has 3 on -call contracts for architectural services. Question 3 Section LA — "For task orders greater than S30,000 City will typically solicit proposals from 3 or more consultant." Does this imply that proposals will be requested from firms already selected from this RFQ? Typically yes. There may be occasion whereby the City will request for proposals for a specific project, and not use our on -call consultants. If not, will selected On -Call Architects be allowed to submit proposals for those task orders? If City pursues a separate RFP for a specific project, existing on -call consultants can submit their proposals. Question 4 Do the five (5) written qualification packages need to include wet signatures on the required forms? No requirement specified for wet signatures. G. OTHER ON CALL RFQs Question 1 Section D, Service Category/Staffing: can you please verify the documentation you would like to see as far as certifications to accompany key personnel resumes; are you looking for California Professional Registration Certificates? The RFQ is not specific on what `pertinent certifications" the proposal needs to include, as it is up to the discretion of each consulting firm. Question 2 For On -Call services, will the prime need to include the following specialty Sub consultants or will the City use its own roster of consultants for these services: structural, traffic, architectural, survey, geotechnical, landscape, mechanical/electrical, corrosion? See response of Question 2 above regarding RFQ that needs to be compliant to federal requirements. For the purpose of this RFQ, professional services for other disciplines are being separate solicited. Question 3 By signing and initialing Exhibit A: Pre -Qualification Form, will this satisfy the requirement to provide a statement, as requested in Section 9. General Requirements, as to agreement with no exceptions to the standard form of agreement or should we include a separate statement in the cover letter to this effect? Completing Exhibit A will satisfy this requirement. Item 16. - 175 HB -648- Question 4 Will covers and divider tabs be excluded from the 15-page limit? Yes Question 5 Under the Firm Qualifications section; item 5 states inclusion of resumes in this section. However, Section 2 Staffing also includes resumes for key personnel. Are we to include resumes in both sections of the Response or can resumes be included in Section 2 only (behind the Organizational chart)? Under staffing, resumes are just included once. See the last sentence under paragraph 1 of Staff. "include resumes for all key individuals as indicated in section 5) above, along with copies of any pertinent certifications" Question 6 Section 2 Staffing also states that copies of any certifications be included as a part of the RFQ response- is this necessary at this stage? Or can copies can be provided upon request? This is at the discretion of each consultant to submit "pertinent certifications". Once a consultant is selected, when required, specific certifications may be necessary at th at time. Question 7 Please clarify the maximum dollar amount for each consultant contract City will finalize exact maximu€n contract amount at a later time. Current on -call contracts have the following maximum contract amount. CM - S1,000,000 Material Testing - S250,000 Water - S1,000,000 Plan Check - S400,000 Civil - S1,000,000 Transportation - S300,000 Ocean - S350,000 Architectural - S250,000 /"" A--w- O "Q _(1i0 TtPm 16 - 171 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR ON -CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADDENDUM 3 Public Works Department CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RFQ Released on November 28, 2017 Addendum 3 issued December 21, 2017 tem 1 6_ - 177 uR _�;n Question la Question regarding the required Caltrans forms. The City response to Question DI stated that Exhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet This is just the evaluation form. Question Ib Are Exhibit 17-F Final Report — Utilization of Disadvantage Business Enterprises (DBE) and First -Tier Subcontractor to be included in the submittal? Depending on DBE goals established for each RF'Q, if any, and if the consultant has DBE subs, fill this out. Question 2 Exhibit 10-B is for use by evaluators and Exhibit 17-F is to be submitted with invoices. In terms of the submittal, what is the City requesting that the consultant complete on these forms? Exhibit 10-B is the rating form, so no need to fill out but disclosed to each consultant. As for Exhibit 17-F, depending on DBE goals established for each RF'Q, if any, and if the consultant has DBE subs, you should fill this out. Question 3 Based on my review of the Caltrans forms and my past experience, it's my understanding that only certain forins are required to be provided by the proposer. Below is a breakdown of my understanding of the forms. Can you please confirm whether or not this is correct? Caltrans Understanding Form # 10-B For use by the proposal evaluation committee, not to be provided by the proposer Yes 10-H One of the three cost proposal examples, to be provided by the prime consultant and the subconsultant(s) #2 for the prime consultant, and #3 pertains to Geotechnieal and Material Testing 10-I For the agency to notify proposers of the DBE requirements, not to be provided by the proposer is an info sheet 10-K To be provided by the prime consultant and subconsultant(s) Yes 10-01 To be provided by the prime consultant, with information obtained from the subconsultant(s) Yes 10-02 To be provided by the prime consultant, with information obtained from the subconsultant(s) Yes ] 0-Q To be provided by the prime consultant and subconsultant(s) 1'es 17-F To be provided by the prime consultant & 1st tier subconsultants upon the completion of an assigned project Yes Question 4 In the Construction Management RFQ it asks for NAASCO Certified inspectors. Is this applicable to this solicitation since this was also in the last on -call RFQ that was more water focused? «Ve are requiring \NAACO Certified Inspectors like what the did last time, and this RFQ for inspection is not specialized for water. Question 5 Page 4 of the RFQ document states that Consultants are required to complete ALL attached Caltrans forms in Appendix D; However, the following forms are not applicable during the proposal stage since the first form deals with scoring and the two other forms deal with DBE subs AFTER the contract has been awarded. Please confirm that these Exhibits are to be excluded from the proposal submission Exhibit 10-13, (This is the evaluation form for City to use) Exhibit 10-02 (Both prime and sub to complete as much as available during proposal stage) and Exhibit 17-F (To be provided by the prime consultant & 1st tier subconsultants upon the completion of an assigned project) Question 6 Page 7 of the RFQ document lists four bullet points (Capability of Developing Innovative or Advanced Techniques, Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures, Financial Responsibility, and Demonstrate Technical Ability). Do these four bullet points fall under the "Understanding and Methodology Section' or are they each their own separate section within D. Service Category? At the discretion of each consultant. Question 7 Page 7 of the RFQ document lists "Financial Responsibility" as a bullet point. Please clarify what kind of financials the City is requesting as this is a vague requirement. This is taken from Exhibit 10-B of Caltrans evaluation form. See Caltrans Local Assistance Procedure Manual. Question 8 Page 7 of the RFQ document lists "Demonstrate Technical Ability" as a bullet point. Please clarify what the City is requesting Consultants to show as this is a vague requirement. This is taken from Exhibit 10-B of Caltrans evaluation form. See Caltrans Local Assistance Procedure Manual. Question 9 Could we be approved as a CM through this RFQ, but not do any of the Caltrans work? City has both types of projects, Caltrans work, or just City. -em 1 F_ - 179 "P _F; Question 10 Or is the Caltrans work required as part of this On -call? For CM, consultant is to be equipped to handle Caltrans work. Question 11 Will this On -call list be used for projects other than Caltrans? Yes Question 12 Does the city anticipate releasing an RFQ for other types of work, i.e. vertical projects, or might those be included with this one? 8 categories were released simultaneously for this round. Depending on other needs, City could pursue others in the future. TA IIIc2 TtPm 11i - 1 RI 175 Technology Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618 949 648 5200 Item 16. - 181 HB -654- EXHIBIT "B" Payment Schedule (Hourly Payment) A. Hourly Rate CONSULTANT'S fees for such services shall be based upon the following hourly rate and cost schedule: B. Travel Charges for time during travel are not reimbursable. C. Billing I . All billing shall be done monthly in fifteen (15) minute increments and matched to an appropriate breakdown of the time that was taken to perform that work and who performed it. 2. Each month's bill should include a total to date. That total should provide, at a glance, the total fees and costs incurred to date for the project. 3. A copy of memoranda, letters, reports, calculations and other docurnentation prepared by CONSULTANT may be required to be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. 4. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each monthly payment due. Such invoice shall: A) Reference this Agreement; B) Describe the services performed; C) Show the total amount of the payment due; D) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULTANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and E) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSULTANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT in writing of the reasons for non -approval and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" may at the option of CITY be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULTANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement has expired or is terminated as provided herein. 1 Exhibit B 5. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized in advance and in writing by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. 2 Exhibit B l� x" 1,€bit B Fee Schedule For services by GHD, Inc. Effective through June 30, 2018 Hourly Rates* Principal -In -Charge / QA/QC $205 - 245 Senior Project Manager $165 - 226 Project Manager $175 - 223 Senior Engineer $160 - 220 Project Engineer $150 - 180 Staff Engineer $115 - 155 CAD Designer $ 80 - 165 Drafter $ 75 - 120 Project Assistant $ 70 - 125 Employee time will be billed in accordance with the fees listed above. Standard computer and technology costs are incorporated into these hourly rates, as well as direct labor, overhead, and fringe benefits. These rates are subject to change on a semi-annual basis. Professional employees will not be charged out at premium charge rates for overtime work. Expenses and other similar project related costs are billed out at cost plus 15%. The cost of office consumables is billed on the basis of employee hours dedicated to the project at a rate of $6.00/hour. Mileage will be billed at $.535 per mile (or current IRS allowable rate) and parking expenses incurred by office employees are charged at cost. The services of outside consultants will be charged at cost plus 15%. (`) These rates do not apply to forensic -related services, or to work for which Prevailing Wage obligations exist. It is the responsibility of the client to notify GHD Inc, in writing if Prevailing Wage obligations are applicable, in which case the fees will be adjusted proportionate to the increase in labor costs. Page 1 of 1 A O® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MMIDDIYYYY) 03/26/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT NAME: _ PHONE FAX . 1-877-945-7378 A!C No: 1-888-467-2378 Willis of Massachusetts, Inc. c/o 26 Century Blvd P.O. Box 305191 EMAIL ADDRESS: certificates@Willis.com INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# Nashville, TN 372305191 USA INSURERA: Allied World Assurance Company U S Inc 19489 INSURED INSURER B: Zurich American Insurance Company 16535 GHD Inc. 4747 N. 22nd Street, Suite 200 INSURER C : Lexington Insurance Company 19437 INSURER D: Phoenix, AZ 85016 INSURER E : _ INSURER F : rnVGwer_Gs rFRTIIII IJIIMRFR• W5581550 RFVISION NIIIII THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICYNUMBER POLICY EFF MM/DD/YYYY POLICY EXP MM/DDIYYYY LIMITS X COMMERCIALGENERALLIABILITY EACHOCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS -MADE Fx_] OCCUR DAMAGE TO PREMISES EaEoccurrence _ $ 1,000,000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 25,000 A y 0310-4497 12/01/2017 12/01/2018 PERSONAL 8 ADV INJURY ^ 1,000,000 $ _ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 POLICY ] JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 $ OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY EOM�BINdEDtSINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ X ANY AUTO B OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BAP 3757423-02 07/01/2017 07/01/2018 BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ X HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY X AUTOS ONLY 500 Comp Ded: 250 X Coll Ded: X PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident _ $ Hired Physical Damag S 100000 UM13RELLALIAB HCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ s AGGREGATE $ EXCESS LIAB DED RETENTIONS S B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ANYPROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE o OFFICER/MEMBEREXCLUDED? No (Mandatory In NH) N/A WC 0380936-02 07/01/2017 07/01/2018 X STATUTE OER E.L.EACHACCIDENT S 11000,000 E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 E.L DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below I C Professional Liability 031710989 12/01/2017 12/01/2018 Each Claim $1,000,000 Aggregate $2,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, maybe attached if more space is required) On -Call Water Engineering & Professional Consulting Services Certificate holder(s) continued: The City of Huntington Beach, its officers, elected or appointed officials, employees, agents and volunteers are included as Additional Insureds as respects to Genelalp 4mp1 TghEQR*equired s by contract or agreement. By: _ ICHAEL E. Fq GERIIFIGALE HOLDER GANGtLLAIIUN City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE V r)rU9MV",a— ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD SR ID: 15853622 BATca: 646544 Bidder's List for Ocean & Engineering - 2018 !Company Name Phone 'Anchor QEA 949-347-2780 `GHD Inc i949-585-5218 Moffatt & Nichol 562-590-6500 Noble Consultants, Inc. ' 949-752-1530 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND GHD, INC FOR ON CALL OCEAN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES Table of Contents Scope of Services CityStaff Assistance................................................................................................2 Term; Time of Performance.....................................................................................2 Compensation..........................................................................................................2 ExtraWork...............................................................................................................2 Methodof Payment..................................................................................................3 Disposition of Plans, Estimates and Other Documents...........................................3 HoldHarmless.........................................................................................................3 Professional Liability Insurance.............................................................................4 Certificate of Insurance............................................................................................5 Independent Contractor............................................................................................6 Termination of Agreement.......................................................................................6 Assignment and Delegation......................................................................................6 Copyrights/Patents...................................................................................................7 City Employees and Officials..................................................................................7 Notices.........................................................................................7 Consent....................................................................................................................8 Modification.............................................................................................................8 SectionHeadings.....................................................................................................8 Interpretation of this Agreement..............................................................................8 DuplicateOriginal....................................................................................................9 Immigration...............................................................................................................9 Legal Services Subcontracting Prohibited................................................................9 Attorney's Fees..........................................................................................................10 Survival.....................................................................................................................10 GoverningLaw.........................................................................................................10 Signatories.................................................................................................................10 Entirety......................................................................................................................10 EffectiveDate.................................................................................II PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AWARD ANALYSIS SERVICE: On -Call Ocean & Engineering SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Engineering support for City's annual Capital Improvement Program projects. VENDOR: Moffatt& Nichol. OVERALL RANKING: lout of 4 SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS/RATERS: 1. Principal Civil Engineer 2. Planning Manager 3. Senior Planner I. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REVIEW • Written Proposal Score.- Avg. of 87.7 ,Moffatt & Nichol "1Minimum Qualifications Review 7,7 Total Wei_qhted Maximum Criteria Score Score Proposal Clarity 8.7 10 Qualifications and experience of Firm, key individuals and sub - consultants. 24.7 25 Staffing 24.7 25 Understanding & Methodology 14.7 15 References 10 10 Local Vendor Preference 5 5 Interview (Optional) - 15 Total F7777","! _r II. DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW Moffatt-'AN i h I Summary .......­J'f _.-gyipy 1,0 • Moffatt & Nichol has worked with the City in the past, and proposal is clear and concise Moffatt 8� " NicholPriding • Low end from $85/Hr for General Clerical • High end to $266/Hr for Principal Engineer Scientist HB -657- Item 16. - 184 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AWARD ANALYSIS SERVICE: On -Call Ocean & Engineering SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Engineering support for City's annual Capital Improvement Program projects. VENDOR: Anchor QEA. OVERALL RANKING: 2 out of 4 SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS/RATERS: 1. Principal Civil Engineer 2. Planning Manager 3. Senior Planner I. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REVIEW • Written Proposal Score: Avg. of 82 ichor QEA'­ Minimum Criteria Proposal Clarity Qualifications and experience of Firm, key individuals and sub - consultants. Staffing Understanding & Methodology References Local Vendor Preference Interview (Optional) Total alifications Review.'':''::; Total Weighted Maximum Score Score 9 10 II. DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW 23.3 25 23.7 25 14 15 7 10 5 5 - 15 Ancho"r QEA= Summary of Review • Anchor QEA proposal was clear and concise and their overall methodology was easy to understand Anch6r'QEA: Pricing. • Low end from' $106/Hr for Contract/Project Coordinator • High end to $270/Hr for Principal 2 Engineer /Planner/ Scientist Item 16. - 185 xB -658- PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AWARD ANALYSIS SERVICE: On -Call Ocean & Engineering SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Engineering support for City's annual Capital Improvement Program projects. VENDOR: GHD OVERALL RANKING: 3 out of 4 SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS/RATERS: 1. Principal Civil Engineer 2. Planning Manager 3. Senior Planner I. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REVIEW • Written Proposal Score: Avg. of 78 GHD — Minimum Qualifications Rdvie'w Total Weighted Maximum Criteria Score Score Proposal Clarity 8 10 Qualifications and experience of Firm, key individuals and sub - consultants. 21 25 Staffing 22.7 25 Understanding & Methodology 14.3 15 References 7 10 Local Vendor Preference 5 5 Interview (Optional) - 15 Total 78 105; II. DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW G.HD Summary'of Review • GHD had a clear and concise proposal and good project management experience GH13" Pricing' • Low end from $70/Hr for Project Assistant • High end to $245/Hr for Principal-In-Charge/QA/QC xB -659- Item 16. - 186 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AWARD ANALYSIS SERVICE: On -Call Ocean & Engineering SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Engineering support for City's annual Capital Improvement Program projects. VENDOR: Vendor #4. OVERALL RANKING: 4 out of 4 SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS/RATERS: 1. Principal Civil Engineer 2. Planning Manager 3. Senior Planner I. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS REVIEW • Written Proposal Score: Avg, of 71.7 Vendor #4 = Minimum Qualifications Review Total Weighted Maximum Criteria Score Score Proposal Clarity 7.3 10 Qualifications and experience of Firm, key individuals and sub - consultants. 24 25 Staffing 23 25 Understanding & Methodology 5.3 15 References 7 10 Local Vendor Preference 5 5 Interview (Optional) - 15 Total II. DUE DILIGENCE REVIEW NDOR#4 Summary of Review • Vendor #4's proposal lacked detail regarding methodolo y • Low end from $84/Hr for Word Processing / Clerical • High end to $310/Hr for Senior Principal Engineer Item 16. - 187 HB -660- City of Huntington Beach 200o Main Street ♦ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 ♦ www.huntingtonbeachca.gov _Office of the City Clerk Robin Estanislau, City Clerk May 24, 2018 GHD, Inc. LLC Attn: Paul Hermann 175 Technology Drive, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92618 Dear Mr. Hermann: Enclosed is a copy of the fully executed "Professional Services Contract between the City of Huntington Beach and GHD, INC. For On Call Ocean and Engineering Services." Sincerely, Robin Estanislau, CIVIC City Clerk RE:ds Enclosure Sister Cities. Anjo, Japan ♦ Waitakere, New Zealand