HomeMy WebLinkAboutMobile Home Advisory Board - Ordinance 3332 establishing Boa (2) Gr-' 2000 Main Street,
o�pN? GTp v Huntington Beach,CA
92648
City of Huntington Beach ORD NOS. 4296,4295, 4298, 4299
9 ea;;: --174 APPROVED 4-3 (KALMICK, MOSER,
�CFCpU `�F�Q BOLTON — NO)
ORD NOS. 4297,4300,4301
APPROVED 5-2 (MOSER,BOLTON—NO)
File #: 23-758 MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Al Zelinka, City Manager
VIA: Travis K. Hopkins, Assistant City Manager
PREPARED BY: Travis K. Hopkins, Assistant City Manager
Grace Yoon-Taylor, Principal Management Analyst
Subject:
Adopt Ordinances to amend the Huntington Beach Municipal Code to streamline, consolidate,
and/or dissolve a select number of the City's Boards, Commissions, and Committees and
Council Committees
Ordinance Nos. 4296, 4295, 4298, 4299 approved for introduction September 5, 2023 - Vote: 4-3
(Kalmick, Moser, Bolton - No); Ordinance Nos. 4297, 4300, 4301 approved for introduction
September 5, 2023 - Vote: 5-2 (Moser, Bolton - No)
Statement of Issue:
On May 16, 2023, City Council approved the formation of an Ad Hoc Council Committee to review the
City's existing Boards, Commissions, and Committees (BCCs) and their roles and duties relevant to
City operations. As such, the BCC Review Ad Hoc Council Committee comprised of Mayor Tony
Strickland, Mayor Pro Tern Gracey Van Der Mark, and Councilmember Pat Burns met three times to
deliberate and have since proposed nine recommendations to streamline and restructure a select
number of BCCs.
On August 1, 2023, City Council approved the nine recommendations and directed staff to prepare
the appropriate Resolution(s) and Ordinances (attached) to effectuate them. On September 5, 2023,
City Council approved the introduction of Ordinance Nos. 4296, 4295, 4298, 4299, 4297, 4300, and
4301.
Financial Impact:
There are no fiscal impacts.
Recommended Action:
A) Adopt Ordinance No. 4296, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach repealing Ordinance
No. 4168 and delete Chapter 2.104 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code dissolving the Jet Noise
City of Huntington Beach Page 1 of 5 Printed on 9/27/2023
powered by Legistarr"
File #: 23-758 MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023
Commission;" and
B) Adopt Ordinance No. 4295, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach repealing Ordinance
No. 3332 and delete Chapter 2.112 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code dissolving the Mobile
Home Advisory Board;" and
C) Adopt Ordinance No. 4298, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach deleting Chapter
2.102 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and dissolving the Environmental and Sustainability
Board;" and
D) Adopt Ordinance No. 4299, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the
Huntington Beach Municipal Code by amending Chapter 2.111 thereof related to Citizen
Infrastructure Advisory Board/Public Works Commission"; and approve the official dissolution of the
Smart Cities and Technology Council Committee by minute action; and
E) Adopt Ordinance No. 4297, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach deleting Chapter
2.108 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and dissolving the Huntington Beach Youth Board;"
and
F) Adopt Ordinance No. 4300, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the
Huntington Beach Municipal Code by amending Chapter 2.106 thereof related to Fourth of July
Executive Board;" and
G) Adopt Ordinance No. 4301, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the
Huntington Beach Municipal Code by amending Chapter 13.54 thereof related to Specific Events."
Alternative Action(s):
Do not approve one or more recommendations, and direct staff accordingly.
Analysis:
On September 5, 2023, City staff, working with the City Attorney's Office, prepared and presented the
appropriate Resolution(s), Ordinance(s), and other reports necessary to effectuate the Council-
approved recommendations to streamline, consolidate, and/or dissolve a select number of Boards,
Commissions, Committees and Council Committees. The following recommendations A through K
were approved by the City Council on September 5, 2023.
As indicated below, if Ordinance Nos. 4296, 4295, 4298, 4299, 4297, 4300, and 4301 were adopted
tonight, the ordinance would go into effect 30 days thereafter. At that time, the City would also
update and publish the updated Council Liaison List, Maddy Act Appointment List, and other public
information accordingly.
• Recommendation A: City Council approved the official dissolution of the City Council Short-
Term Rentals Ad Hoc Committee, Housing/RHNA Ad Hoc Committee, and Cannabis
City of Huntington Beach Page 2 of 5 Printed on 9/27/2023
powered by Legistar'"
File #: 23-758 MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023
Regulation and Policy Ad Hoc Committee. -Approved via Council Minute Action - Vote: 4-3
(Bolton, Kalmick, Moser- No)
• Recommendation B: City Council approved to rename and broaden the scope of work ofthe
Urban Design Study Ad Hoc Council Committee to include the hotels and the numbered
streets beyond Main Street and PCH relinquishment and beautification, etc. The Community
Development Department will provide continued staff support. -Approved via Council Minute
Action Vote: 5-2 (Bolton, Moser- No)
• Recommendation C: Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-40 formally dissolved the Huntington
Beach Human Relations Committee (HBHRC) and retired its current members on September
5, 2023. - Approved via Resolution Adoption - Vote: 4-3 (Bolton, Kalmick, Moser- No)
• Recommendation D:Adoption of Ordinance No. 4296 (Attachment 1) will repeal HBMC
Chapter 2.104 Jet Noise Commission, formally dissolving the Commission and retiring its
current members. The first reading of the Ordinance was approved on September 5, 2023. If
the second reading is adopted tonight, it takes effect 30 days thereafter. Any outstanding
projects led by the Commission shall be diverted to City staff and/or the Intergovernmental
Relations Committee (I RC). -Approved for Introduction of the Ordinance No. 4296- Vote: 4-3
(Bolton, Kalmick, Moser- No)
• Recommendation E: Adoption of Ordinance No. 4295 (Attachment 2) will repeal HBMC
Chapter 2.112 Mobile Home Advisory Board, formally dissolving the Board and retiring its
current members. The first reading of the Ordinance was approved on September 5, 2023. If
the second reading is adopted tonight, it takes effect 30 days thereafter. - Approved for
Introduction of the Ordinance No. 4295- Vote: 4-3 (Bolton, Kalmick, Moser- No)
• Recommendation F& G: Adoption of Ordinance Nos. 4298 (Attachment 3) and 4299
(Attachment 4) will repeal HBMC Chapter 2.102 Environmental and Sustainability Board
(ESB) and update Chapter 2.111 Citizen Infrastructure Advisory Board/Public Works
Commission (CIAB/PW), respectively. The first reading of the Ordinance was approved on
September 5, 2023. If the second reading is adopted tonight, it takes effect 30 days thereafter.
- Approved for Introduction of the Ordinance Nos. 4298 and 4299 - Vote: 4-3 (Bolton, Kalmick,
Moser- No)
The Smart Cities and Technology Council Committee (SCTCC) was officially dissolved on
September 5, 2023 -Approved via Council Minute Action Vote: 4-3 (Bolton, Kalmick, Moser-
No)
The core duties and goals of the ESB and the SCTCC will be shifted to the CIAB/Public Works
Commission, as appropriate.
• Recommendation H: Adoption of Ordinance No. 4297 (Attachment 5) will repeal HBMC
Chapter 2.108 Huntington Beach Youth Board. The first reading of the Ordinance was
City of Huntington Beach Page 3 of 5 Printed on 9/27/2023
powered by Legistar1M
File #: 23-758 MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023
approved on September 5, 2023. If the second reading is adopted tonight, it takes effect 30
days thereafter. - Approved for Introduction of the Ordinance No. 4297- Vote: 5-2 (Bolton,
Moser- No)
In lieu of the Youth Board, the Community and Library Services Department plans to establish
an alternative non-Brown Act working group of select members of highly qualified, local high
school students, Youth Civic Leaders Collaborative (YCLC).
The YCLC will enable continued youth engagement with City affairs as its volunteer members
can help plan and coordinate the Annual Youth in Government Day, the Junior Citizens
Academy and other various projects requested by the City more effectively and efficiently. The
YCLC can have a similar member selection process as the Youth Board (but not as Council
appointees) and current Board members in good standing may continue their membership
with the newly created YCLC.
• Recommendation I: Adoption of Ordinance No. 4300 (Attachment 6) will rename the
Fourth of July Executive Board to Independence Day Board with more clear and defined roles.
Some proposed language changes in the Municipal Code also are to reflect current practices
and to consistent with HBMC Chapter 2.100 Operating Policies for Boards and Commissions.
The first reading of the Ordinance was approved on September 5, 2023. If the second reading
is adopted tonight, it takes effect 30 days thereafter. - Approved for Introduction of the
Ordinance No. 4300- Vote: 5-2 (Bolton, Moser- No)
Recommendation J: Adoption of Ordinance No. 4301 (Attachment 7) will update Chapter
13.54 Specific Events. This action will clarify roles of the Specific Events Committee, which is
an internal staff group to discuss the permitting and any logistical requirements for each
proposed event, and establish a separate Council standing committee to review and
recommend overall policy on large-scale specific events in the City, based on City Council's
priorities.
The Community and Library Service Department will serve as a staff liaison(s) to this Council
Committee. As City staff conducts a more in-depth review of the HBMC Chapter 13.54 and
citywide event permitting policy and procedure, City staff plans to bring back any
recommendations and subsequent code updates for the Council's consideration at a later
time.
The first reading of the Ordinance was approved on September 5, 2023. If the second reading
is adopted tonight, it takes effect 30 days thereafter. -Approved for Introduction of the
Ordinance No. 4301 - Vote: 5-2 (Bolton, Moser- No)
• Recommendation K: The Boards, Commissions, and Committees Review Ad Hoc Council
Committee was officially dissolved effectively September 5, 2023 -Approved via Council
Minute Action 4-3 (Bolton, Kalmick, Moser- No).
Environmental Status:
City of Huntington Beach Page 4 of 5 Printed on 9/27/2023
powered by LegistarTM
File #: 23-758 MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), administrative activities of governments that will
not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not constitute a project.
Strategic Plan Goal:
Community Engagement
Attachment(s):
1. Ordinance No. 4296, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach repealing Ordinance No.
4168 and deleting Chapter 2.104 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code dissolving the Jet
Noise Commission"
2. Ordinance No. 4295, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach repealing Ordinance No.
3332 and deleting Chapter 2.112 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code dissolving the
Mobile Home Advisory Board"
3. Ordinance No. 4298, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach deleting Chapter 2.102 of
the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and dissolving the Environmental and Sustainability
Board"
4. Ordinance No. 4299, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington
Beach Municipal Code by amending Chapter 2.111 thereof related to Citizen Infrastructure
Advisory Board/Public Works Commission"
5. Ordinance No. 4297, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach deleting Chapter 2.108 of
the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and dissolving the Huntington Beach Youth Board"
6. Ordinance No. 4300, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington
Beach Municipal Code by amending Chapter 2.106 thereof related to Fourth of July Executive
Board"
7. Ordinance No. 4301, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the Huntington
Beach Municipal Code by amending Chapter 13.54 thereof related to Specific Events"
City of Huntington Beach Page 5 of 5 Printed on 9/27/2023
powered by LegistarTM
ORDINANCE NO. 4295
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 3332 AND DELETE CHAPTER 2.112 OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
DISSOLVING THE MOBILE HOME ADVISORY BOARD
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2023,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
directed the City Attorney and the City Manager to collaborate to return to City council with the
necessary actions to delete Chapter 2.112 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, and
dissolve the Mobile Home Advisory Board.
NOW, THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 3332 of the City of Huntington Beach is hereby repealed in
its entirety.
SECTION 2. By virtue of the repeal of Ordinance No. 3332, Chapter 2.112 of the
Huntington Beach Municipal Code is deleted.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of October , 2023.
1'7 ,,,O&L"..D
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO ORM:
di 1 9,4714,..jand
City I City Attorney
VIEWED ` I • 'PROVED: TIATED AND APPROVED:
Naib
City Manage Assistant City anager
23-13325/317370
Ord. No. 4295
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ROBIN ESTANISLAU,the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do
hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven;that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at
a Regular meeting thereof held on September 5,2023, and was again read to said City
Council at a Regular meeting thereof held on October 3,2023,and was passed and
adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City
Council.
AYES: Van Der Mark, Strickland,McKeon, Bums
NOES: Kalmick,Moser, Bolton
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
I,Robin Estanislau,CITY CLERK of the City of Huntington
Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,do hereby
certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been published in
the Huntington Beach Wave on October 12,2023. 6: 01;141, €6k1414A4)
In accordance with the City Charter of said City.
Robin Estanislau,City Clerk City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
Senior Deputy City Clerk of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
LEGISLATIVE DRAFT
HBMC 2.112
There is hereby established a Mobile Home Advisory Board.(3332 7/96)
The purpose of the board shall be:
A T t 1 I l't, 1i f of ,bile ho r- .,d+., ..tte `.' 1.bile ,o
1 +1. Cit of H tingto Be c thr g7,health atio it . rk a „f„ture.l
B. To act in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters concerning the mobile home
community. (3332 7/96)
rT'1ae Mobil zidvisory Board all consist
v
:le
d er d nom a 1T��ho -or- no r esi •d ,
+; + 1 1, 1, ff 1' +:
or relationship with mobile home parks. (3332 7/96,3921 12/11)
J ^J J• ^Je �
C•s, C 1 + h 1,vote is take„ Any membe« 1, b nt.,h:.., or herself f.e„.,three
, r
ily�..,.,, +l,e Be «.l .,+., .+:.,.. • ..+..be .... �.+e.l
�uu
1 r +L v fre „hate a 1,:.-+1� M „it the a of+l,e lamity
Council, for the unexpired term of office. (3332 7/96)
No person shall serve more than two consecutive four year terms. (3332 7/96)
Tho Director of Economic ,
Y D eY Ye o^ a
other departments of the City. (3332 7/96)
+1.. bl .7 + t wi+1,+he a r of the Br mA t( u eetir.c...• l ,.) A rity oft e
i �'e
7
7
TL L '1 h 11 F + +1, rr
ti olicies for bo rds an.7 set forth.
Chapter 2.100 of this Codc with the exception of Section 2.100.050. (3332 7/96)
subject to prior submission to and approval by the City Council. (3332 7/96)
Tt� Ad bi H A.7 B 11 a est of+L.e Directo of Ec c De elo e„t t e atter..7ance
t i+ t: ay p .+� �f ff; l e a o f e y Cit t„ rt+t, b its delibe atio ad.
r �
t. b + h h 11 the a the uthority to ot r atter-b�u eingee e idd by the bo .i r
(3332 7/96)
City Council/ ACTION AGENDA October 3, 2023
Public Financing Authority
Recommended Action:
A) Approve and adept the Ci-ty Co c,+4/PUbGc Fib Authority regular meeting minutes of
August 1, 2023; and Withdrawn
B) Approve and adopt the City Council/Public Financing Authority regular meeting minutes of
September 5, 2023; and
C) Approve and adopt the City Council/Public Financing Authority regular meeting minutes of
September 19, 2023; and
D) Approve and adopt the City Council/Public Financing Authority special meeting minutes of
September 14, 2023.
Items B, C and D Approved 7-0
6. 23-825 September Update of Activities for Citizen Boards, Commissions,
Committees (BCCs) and Regional Agencies
Recommended Action:
Receive and File.
Approved 7-0
CITY MANAGER
7. 23-758 Adopted Ordinances to amend the Huntington Beach Municipal Code to
streamline, consolidate, and/or dissolve a select number of the City's
Boards, Commissions, and Committees and Council Committees
Ordinance Nos. 4296, 4295, 4298, 4299 approved for introduction
September 5, 2023 -Vote: 4-3 (Kalmick, Moser, Bolton - No);
Ordinance Nos. 4297, 4300, 4301 approved for introduction September 5,
2023 -Vote: 5-2 (Moser, Bolton - No)
Recommended Action:
A) Adopt Ordinance No. 4296, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach repealing
Ordinance No. 4168 and delete Chapter 2.104 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code
dissolving the Jet Noise Commission;" and
B) Adopt Ordinance No. 4295, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach repealing
Ordinance No. 3332 and delete Chapter 2.112 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code
dissolving the Mobile Home Advisory Board;" and
C) Adopt Ordinance No. 4298, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach deleting
Chapter 2.102 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and dissolving the Environmental and
Sustainability Board;" and
Page 4 of 7
City Council/ ACTION AGENDA October 3, 2023
Public Financing Authority
D) Adopt Ordinance No. 4299, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the
Huntington Beach Municipal Code by amending Chapter 2.111 thereof related to Citizen
Infrastructure Advisory Board/Public Works Commission"; and approve the official dissolution
of the Smart Cities and Technology Council Committee by minute action; and
E) Adopt Ordinance No. 4297, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach deleting
Chapter 2.108 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and dissolving the Huntington Beach
Youth Board;" and
F) Adopt Ordinance No. 4300, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the
Huntington Beach Municipal Code by amending Chapter 2.106 thereof related to Fourth of
July Executive Board;" and
G) Adopt Ordinance No. 4301, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach amending the
Huntington Beach Municipal Code by amending Chapter 13.54 thereof related to Specific
Events."
Ordinance Nos. 4296, 4295, 4298, 4299 Approved 4-3 (Kalmick, Moser, Bolton - No);
Ordinance Nos. 4297, 4300, 4301 Approved 5-2 (Moser, Bolton—No)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
8. 23-581 Denied adoption of Resolution No. 2023-39 authorizing the acceptance of
$325,000 in grant funds from the California Department of Cannabis Control
(DCC) to assist in the development of a cannabis retail access program
Recommended Action:
A) Adopt Resolution No. 2023-39, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach Authorizing the Acceptance of Funds from the Department of Cannabis Control (DCC)
from the Cannabis Local Jurisdiction Retail Access Grant" and appropriate the $325,000 grant
award; and
Failed 3-4 (Van Der Mark, Strickland, McKeon, Burns-No)
for the rd d to n r e am dmen4 nd extensions as needed• and
C) Formally dissolve the City Council Cannabis Ad-Hoc Committee.
Approved 4-3 (Kalmick, Moser, Bolton-No)
PUBLIC WORKS
9. 23-749 Approved Fifth Amendment to the West Orange County Water Board Joint
Powers Agreement allowing member agencies to designate up to two
alternate members to the Board of Directors
Recommended Action:
Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Fifth Amendment to the
WOCWB Joint Powers Agreement.
Approved 7-0
Page 5 of 7
BYLAWS ,
HUNTINGTON BEACH MOBILE HOME ADVISORY BOARD
ARTICLE I: MEETINGS
Section 1. Board Meetings
1. Regular meetings shall be held on the forth (4th)Monday of each month at [time] and [place].
2. Special Board meetings may be convened by the Chair or by written request by three (3) or
more of the members of the Board.
Section 2. Officers
The officers of the Mobile Home Advisory Board are the Chair and Chair Elect. The officers
shall be selected from the three independent members of the for a one year term. Once officers
are elected, after the first.year, the Chair Elect shall rotate to Chair, and a new Chair Elect shall be
elected
Section 3. Duties
1. Chair:
The Chair shall preside at all meeting and serve as the official spokesperson of the Board and
carry out the decisions of the Board.
2. Chair Elect:
The Chair Elect shall assume all duties of the Chair in any absence of the Chair or until any
vacancy in that office is filled.
3. Chair Pro-Tempore:
Chair Pro-Tempore shall be elected by ballot (for that meeting only), in the event of absence
of the Chair, Chair Elect, and the third independent member.
1
S Fps:FCD:Ordinance:Moblhome
6/7/96
RLS 96-312
Section 4. Annual Report
The Board shall prepare a report annually for the City Council for review. The report shall
include, but not be limited to the following information:
• Number of meetings held
• Board member attendance '
• Staff support and involvement
• Number of written complaints by citizens and/or request for Board assistance
• Action and activities
• Review expenses incurred and any recommended budget allocation request for the
following year.
Section 5. Meeting Procedures
1. Minutes (written and audio) shall be kept of all Board meetings by city staff and approved
by the Board.
2. Public comments shall be heard at the beginning of each Board meeting. Each public
comment shall be allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes.
Section 6. Representation
No Board member shall act in an official capacity as a representative of the Board unless directed
to do so by a majority vote of all member of the Board. Only authorized business cards shall be
issued to or used by Board members.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk Cl/�v Attorney
6 7 � G
2
'SF\s:PCD:Ordinance:Moblhome
6/7/96
RLS 96-312
Huntington Beach Municipal Code ` " 2.112.010-2.112.060
Chapter 2.112
MOBILE HOME ADVISORY BOARD
(3332-7/96)
Sections:
2.112.010 Board established
2.112.020 Purpose
2.112.030 Composition
2.112.040 Removal of members
2.112.050 Vacancies--Retirement
2.112.060 Service limitation
2.112.070 Secretary
2.112.080 Meetings/Quorum
2.112.090 Operating policies
2.112.100 Bylaws
2.112.110 Advisors
2.112.010 Board established. There is hereby established a Mobile Home Advisory Board.
(3332-7/96)
2.112.020 Purpose. The purpose of the Board shall be: (3332-7/96)
(a) To ensure the quality of life in mobile home parks and to review matters concerning mobile
home parks in the City of Huntington Beach through healthy communication with park
owners, manufactured home owners and the City Council. (3332-7/96)
(b) To act in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters concerning the mobile home
community. (3332-7/96)
2.112.030 Composition. The Mobile Home Advisory Board shall consist of nine (9) members.
Membership shall be comprised of three (3)Huntington Beach mobile home park owners (who
may or may not reside in Huntington Beach), three (3) Huntington Beach mobile home resident
owners, and three (3) Huntington Beach independent citizens-at-large who have no affiliation or
relationship with mobile home parks. All members shall be selected by the City Council from
applicants for such position. (3332-7/96)
2.112.040 Removal of members. Members of the Board shall serve until their respective
successors are appointed and qualified. The City Council shall have the power to fill any
vacancies. Unless otherwise specified, terms of members of the Board shall be four(4) years,
staggered so that the majority of terms shall end in odd-number years following the election of
three (3) council members. Any member of the Board may be removed by majority vote of the
City Council present when such vote is taken. Any member who absents himself from three (3)
consecutive, regular meetings or more without the permission of the Board chairperson shall be
deemed to have resigned from the Board and his office shall become vacant. Any vacancy shall be
filled by appointment for the unexpired term by a majority vote of the Council present and voting.
(3332-7/96)
2.112.050 Vacancies--retirement. Members shall be privileged to retire voluntarily from the
Board at any time; successors to be appointed in such case, or any other vacancy from whatever
cause, by the Mayor, with the approval of the City Council, for the unexpired term of office.
(3332-7/96)
2.112.060 Service limitation. No person shall serve more than two (2) consecutive four(4)
year terms. (3332-7/96)
6/96
2.112.070-2.112.110 Huntington Beach Municipal Code
2.112.070 Secretary. The Director of Economic Development, or his designee, shall serve as
secretary to the Board without the power to vote, and shall keep permanent minutes of the Board
meetings. Accurate and permanent records of the acts of the Board shall be kept, and such
records shall have the same status as records of other department of the city. (3332-7/96)
2.112.080 Meetings/Quorum. (3332-7/96)
(a) The Board shall meet at such time and place as it may fix by resolution. All meetings shall be
open to the public and consistent with the provision of the Brown Act (open meetings law). A
majority of the Board shall constitute a quorum for transaction of business. (3332-7/96)
(b) Upon demand of any member, the roll call shall be called for yeas and nays upon any questions
before the Board. Roberts' Rules of Order Revised shall govern the procedure of meetings of
the Board unless inconsistent with other provisions of this Chapter. (3332-7/96)
2.112.090 Operating policies. The Board shall conform to the operation policies for boards and
commissions as set forth in Chapter 2.100 of this Code with the exception of§ 2.100.050.
(3332-7/96)
2.112.100 Bylaws. The Mobile Home Advisory Board shall adopt such bylaws and rules as it
deems necessary to provide for its officers and their method of selection of time and place of
meetings and for such other matters relative to its work and administration of its duties which are
not otherwise provided for by statue or ordinance, subject to prior submission to and approval by
the City Council. (3332-7/96)
2.112.110 Advisors. The Mobile Home Advisory Board may request of the Director of
Economic Development the attendance at its meetings of any officer or employee of the City to
assist the Board in its deliberations in an advisory capacity but who shall not have the authority to
vote upon any matter being considered by the Board. (3332-7/96)
6/96
Council/Agency Meeting Held: c
D a&
Deferred/Continued to:l
®/Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied City Clerk's Signature
Council Meeting Date: March 2, 1998 Department ID Number: ED 98-07
6&9 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
�SU MITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, Acting City Administrator A)
PREPARED BY: DAVID C. BIGGS, Director of Economic Development
SUBJECT: Presentation of Mobile Home Survey
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue: On January 16, 1996, the City Council authorized a mobile home
survey be conducted within the mobile home community. The results of the survey were to
be reported to the City Council so that direction, if any, may be given to the Mobile Home
Advisory Board. Gary Lawrence. Ph.D., of Lawrence Research will make the presentation to
the City Council on the results of the survey.
Funding Source: None
Recommended Action: Direct the Mobile Home Advisory Board to review the information
received from the survey and develop a work program for future review by the City Council.
Alternative Action(s): Receive and File.
Analysis: On June 5, 1995, the City Council authorized the Mobile Home Advisory
Committee (MHAB) as a permanent committee and requested recommendations be made
regarding the Committee's role and responsibilities. To have better direction for the
committee to follow, the MHAB requested approval of the mobile home survey to determine
the concerns of the mobile home community.- At the City Council meeting of January 16,
1996, Lawrence Research was selected to perform the survey of the mobile home
community. The survey has been completed and the results are attached.
KEQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACIOJN
MEETING DATE: March 2, 1998 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 98-07
Environmental Status: N/A
Attachment(s):
DescriptionCity Clerk's
Page Number No
F2.
. A summary of Public Opinions Mobile Home Survey.
Tele hone Survey by Lawrence Research.
RCA Author: Bruening, 5901
MHSURVEY.DOC -2- 02/13/98 11:24 AM
ATTACHMENT # 1
LAWRENCE
VRESEARCH
PUBLIC AFFAIRS • MARKETING
A SUMMARY OF PUBLIC OPINIONS
FROM A TELEPHONE SURVEY OF MOBILE HOME PARK RESIDENTS
IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Prepared For The
City of Huntington Beach
October 1997
1450 North Tustin Ave.,Suite 150,Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714 / 558-3725 • Fax 714 / 558-0403
Methodology
Between October 16 and 21 , 1997, 400 mobile home park residents,
were interviewed in the city of Huntington Beach, California. All available
mobile home park residents' phone numbers were used, and numbers were
dialed up to three times to complete the study.
Respondents were asked 51 question items, which included 7 open-
ended questions, and the average interview lasted approximately 12
minutes.
Results from a study of this size have a margin of error (95 times out
of 100) of ± 5.0 percentage points from the result which would be obtained
if literally every individual in the population of interest were interviewed.
This margin of error applies to aggregate results in the range of 40%
to 60%. For results that are higher than 60% or lower than 40%, the margin
of error is proportionately smaller.
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Years in Mobile Home Parks
How long have you lived in your current mobile home park?
Out of your whole life, how many years have you lived in mobile home
parks in total?
Current Mobile Home Park Mobile Home Parks During Life
Less than 3 years 2 3 years to less than 5 6
3 years to less than 5 6 5 years to less than 10 29
5 years to less than 10 32 10 years to less than 15 17
10 years to less than 15 16 15 years to less than 25 26
15 years to less than 25 28 25 years to less than 40 19
More than 25 years 17 40 years or more 2
No Opinion/Refused No Opinion / Refused 1
Qs. 1 & 2
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Satisfaction With
Mobile Home Park Living
Generally speaking, how satisfied are you with mobile home park living ...
very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied or very
dissatisfied?
Very satisfied 67
Somewhat satisfied 25
Somewhat dissatisfied 6
Very dissatisfied 3
No Opinion 1
Q.3
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Like Most/Least
About Mobile Home Park Living
First of all, what are some of the things you like most about mobile home
park living?
And what are some of the things you like least about mobile home park
living?
Like Most Like Least
Nice Neighbors/People 36 Rent/Expense 24
Safe 24 Outside Space 8
Amenities/Services 20 Rules 8
No Upkeep 12 Management/Owners 6
Quiet 9 Neighbors/People 5
Location 8 Children Allowed 4
Private/Secluded 8 Land Ownership 4
Affordable/Low Rent 7 No Garages 3
Convenient 5 Condition/Quality of Home 3
Maintenance 3 Maintenance 2
Small Community 3 Parking 2
Community Atmosphere 3 New Developments 2
Quality of Home 2 Inside Space 2
Inside Space 2 Noisy 2
Outside Space 2 Pets Allowed 1
Home Ownership 2 Crime/Safety 1
Clean 2 Facilities/Amenities 1
For Seniors 2 Home Values 1
Management 2 Lack of Storage 1
For Families * Lack of Privacy 1
Miscellaneous 1 No Pets Allowed 1
Miscellaneous 2
General Positive 5
General Negative 1
Don't Know / No Opinion 5
General Positive 31
Don't Know / No Opinion 3
as. 4 & 5
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Acceptability of Various Activities
Think about your current mobile home park in Huntington Beach and please
tell me, for each item I read, whether you feel it is ... very acceptable,
somewhat acceptable, somewhat unacceptable or very unacceptable.
Vry Smw Smw Vry No
Acc Acc Unac Unac Opin
Park maintenance and repairs 65 26 5 4 1
The facilities and the amenities 65 31 2 1 1
The procedures for making rules for the park 41 32 8 7 13
The resolution of problems 42 32 10 6 11
The enforcement of rules and regulations 43 36 12 8 2
Qs. 6-10
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 11
PUBLIC AFFAIRS •MARKETING Page: 48
Q.11 You said that park maintenance and repairs are very unacceptable to you. Would
you elaborate on that? Any examples? (N=16)
Category: Misc
Too many cars parking in the street/Too much junk/Fire hazard.
No one has fixed the street/Chuck holes/Closed down the clubhouse/No lounge.
The road is unacceptable.
No comment.
Parking.
Road repairs/Club and pool facilities.
Things don't look as nice as when they first moved here/Problems aren't looked into/The
properties aren't kept up/Bad lighting.
No opinion.
Pool was broken and they fixed it as fast as they could.
I'm trying to sell my house/No one will buy it because my three neighbors don't take care of their
yard/There are weeds everywhere.
They used to pay for the water and the trash and then we got stuck with it.
I have security laser that got broken and it took them ten days to repair it.
If the plumbing goes they don't have anything to do with it AF your car port needs asphalting they
don't have anything to do with it/Pests/People in the streets.
Have not done repairs/Coach now run down.
The streets are never swept/Don't trim the trees over the street/Let kids run wild.
Park is going to be closed down/When there are potholes in the roads and because they are closing
the park they are not fixing these things.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
'RESEARCH Question: 12
PUBLIC AFFAIRS •MARKETING Page: 49
Q. 12 You said that the resolution of problems is very unacceptable to you. Would you
elaborate on that? Any examples? (N=24)
Category: Misc
I have no rights/I don't get listened to.
The management harasses a young couple in the park, and no one will do anything about it.
The resolution brought no answer.
The manager doesn't listen to problems.
They don't try to solve problems.
Animals.
Managers won't work with people.
Nothing is getting done about noisy neighbors.
No comment.
They don't enforce the rules.
Complaints aren't taken care of/People do whatever they want/There are not enough
consequences.
Rent is too high/I can't afford it.
My friend had a gas leak and the manger was mad because I called him to fix it and he was in the
shower.
Showing partiality.
Hard to change places and parks.
There isn't any resolution of problems,the manager decides.
I was the president of the homeowners association and it was hard to follow through.
Owners won't consider selling to us/I don't think that's really fair after living here for so long/They
ought to give us a break.
Owner was here and decided to close side walks except ours/When the kids were doing damage to
property.
Nothing gets done.
One of the owners told some ladies off, he can't be bothered/ he has other things to do.
Prices, and there is no response for problems.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
- RESEARCH question: 12
PUBLIC AFFAIRS • MARKETING Page: 50
Category: Misc
Can't seem to get cooperation with some of the maintenance people/The manager seems to think
that the problem is yours and not theirs.
Do not follow well.
Feelings of Safety
In terms of your own feelings of safety, do you feel your mobile home park
is ... very safe, somewhat safe, somewhat unsafe or very unsafe?
Very safe 70
Somewhat safe 26
Somewhat unsafe 3
Very unsafe 1
No Opinion
Q.13
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Fairness Issues
Vry Smw Smw Vry No
Fair Fair Unf Unf Opin
In general, is your rent ... 38 36 14 12 1
In comparison to the amenities provided by 37 38 12 10 4
your park, is your rent ...
In comparison to the cost of other housing 49 25 9 6 12
in Huntington Beach, is your rent ...
Are the costs of repairs that are passed 33 31 8 5 24
along to you ...
And are the park rules ... 52 36 8 3 2
Os. 14-18
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Owners and Management
If you had a problem concerning your home or your park, how helpful do
you feel the owners and management of your mobile home park would be
... very helpful, somewhat helpful or not very helpful?
Very helpful 50
Somewhat helpful 31
Not very helpful 15
No Opinion 4
If you had something you wanted to discuss with the owners or
management of your mobile home park, do you feel you could make an
appointment with them within a reasonable period of time, or not?
Yes 89
No 9
No Opinion 3
Qs. 19-20
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Partiality or Equal Consideration
Here are the opinions of two people, call them Smith and Jones. After I
read them, please tell me whether you are ... strongly like Smith, somewhat
like Smith, somewhat like Jones or strongly like Jones.
Smith feels that the owners and management of his park are giving
preferences or showing partiality to certain tenants that they aren't
giving to others.
Jones feels that the owners and management of his park are trying to
give equal consideration to all tenants and are not intentionally giving
preferences or showing partiality.
Strongly like Smith 9
Somewhat like Smith 11
Somewhat like Jones 24
Strongly like Jones 45
No Opinion 11
Q.21
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Partiality or Preferences
What partiality or preferences do you feel are being given in your park?
(N=82)
Rent / Lease Terms 13
Rules 12
Management / Owners 6
Parking 5
Repair / Upkeep 5
Pets 4
Communication 2
Families 2
Seniors 2
Non-Seniors 2
Racial Prejudice 2
Miscellaneous 2
General Negative 6
None 17
Don't Know / No Opinion 24
Q.22
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Lease Arrangement
If you were negotiating the terms of your lease again, would you prefer to
have a month-to-month lease, a one-year lease, or more than a one-year
lease?
Month-to-month lease 18
One-year lease 35
More than one-year 23
No Opinion 25
Q.23
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Reasons for Lease Preferences
And what are the main reasons for your preference for a month-to-month
lease? (N=70)
And what are the main reasons for your preference for this [one year or
more] type of lease? (N=230)
Month-to-Month One Year or More
Flexibility 30 No Increase Worries 20
Don't Like Leases 16 Security/Stability 17
Things Change 10 One Year Long Enough 10
Easier 7 Easier/Less Trouble 5
Rent Control 6 Steady Rent 3
It's All They Offer 6 Planning Ahead 3
Elderly 3 No Plans to Leave 3
Cheaper 3 Time to Negotiate 3
If Need To Sell 3 Flexible 3
Things Change 3
General Positive 9 Age/Elderly 2
More Fair 2
General Negative 1 In Case of Selling 2
Rules Change 1
Miscellaneous 3 Cost of Living
Park Conditions
No Reasons 3
General Positive 10
Don't Know / No Opinion 3
Miscellaneous 7
Don't Know / No Opinion 8
Qs. 24-25
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Subleasing
As you may know, subleasing is where you own your coach and rent it out
to someone else. In general, do you favor or oppose the subleasing of
mobile homes within your park?
Favor 31
Oppose 54
No Opinion 15
Q.26
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Value of Mobile Home
Do you feel your own mobile home is going up or going down in value?
Going up 18
Going down 62
[VOL:] Staying the same 15
No Opinion 6
Do you feel it is going up mainly because of your mobile home park ... or
the economy in general? (N=71)
Mobile home park 39
Economy in general 51
No Opinion 10
Do you feel it is going down mainly because of your mobile home park ...
or the economy in general? (N=248)
Mobile home park 19
Economy in general 69
No Opinion 11
Qs. 27-29
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Rental Assistance Programs
Have you ever heard or read anything about rental-assistance programs that
assist mobile home park tenants with their rent if they're having difficulty
paying? Are you receiving any such rental assistance?
Yes, aware / Yes, receiving 3
Yes, aware / No, not receiving 38
Yes, aware / No Opinion or Ref 4
No, unaware 56
Q.30
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Plans to Stay
Now think again of your own home. How long do you plan to stay in your
present residence?
Less than 3 years 11
3 years to less than 5 3
5 years to less than 10 2
10 years to less than 15 3
15 years to less than 25 2
25 years or more 1
Forever / no plans to move 69
No Opinion / Refused 10
Q.31
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Preference for Next Residence
If you were to move to another residence, which of these would be your
preference?
Mobile home 40
Single family detached home 25
Duplex or four-plex 2
Condo 10
Apartment 7
No Opinion 17
Q.32
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Ownership Status
Do you own your residence free and clear, are you paying a mortgage, or
are you renting?
Free and clear 70
Paying mortgage 27
Renting 2
Refused 2
When you financed your home, how easy or difficult was it to find financing
... very easy, somewhat easy, somewhat difficult or very difficult? (N=106)
Very easy 54
Somewhat easy 26
Somewhat difficult 14
Very difficult 4
No Opinion 2
Have you tried to refinance your home, say, within the last five years or so?
And were you able to find refinancing, or not?
Yes / Yes, could find 6
Yes / No, could not find 17
Yes / No Opinion 1
No 76
No Opinion 0
Qs. 33-35
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Primary or Secondary Residence
Is this home your primary or secondary residence?
Primary 98
Secondary 1
Refused 1
Q.36
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Park Preference
If you had your preference, would you rather live in a family park or a senior
park?
Family park 19
Senior park 76
No Opinion 6
Q.37
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Mobile Home Owners Association
Are you presently a member of a mobile home owners association?
Yes 47
No 51
Refused 2
Q.38
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Household Composition
Counting yourself, how many people live in your home?
One 44
Two 43
Three 8
Four 4
Five
Six or more
Refused 1
Are there any children under the age of 18 in your home?
Yes 9
Are any of them teenagers?
Yes 5
Are any of them 12 or under?
Yes 5
Qs. 39-42
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Age Distribution
What is your age, please?
18-24
25-34 3
35-44 6
45-54 8
55-64 13
65-74 26
75-84 28
85+ 10
Refused 6
Q.43
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Income Distribution
Counting all your sources of income, what is your total annual household
income before taxes?
Less than $15,000 14
$15,000 to $25,000 13
$25,000 to $35,000 9
$35,000 to $50,000 11
$50,000 to $75,000 8
Over $75,000 3
Refused 43
Q.44
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Type of Park
Is your park a family park or a senior park?
Family park 34
Senior park 64
Refused 2
Q.46
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
ATTACHMENT #2
t ecew e D 3�3 C.fY Usk
MOBILE HOME SURVEY
C-�atlav►n l coo, , i MtA2AW,
3" 2,-5 F) &4t-j t all" s"mid"e® by
54eve- C�"414r,
Parks excluded from the Survey:
Oceanview
Huntington Mobile Estates
Beachview
Parks that should have been excluded:
Cabrillo...Owned by Cal Trans....managed by the home owners assn in the
park. Is not preempted by Chapter 2.5 of the California Civil Code, Section
798. a.k.a., The Mobilehome Residency Law. Rent is extremely low, resales
extremely high, because of the low rent.
Driftwood....City owned land......park is closing.....homes are being
purchased by the City at highly inflated prices due to a contract with H.B.
Oceanview....Owned by the City.....This park is the "A" Group who were
moved to this space by the City and received new homes paid for by the City
of Hunt. Beach.
Questions # 4 and 5....What are some of the things you like most about mobile
home living? And what are some of the things you like least about mobile
home living?
There were 163 responses to Q.#4 and 119 responses to Q.#5. That is 42%
and 30% respectively. These percentages include the "no opinion" responses.
What happened to the remaining 118?
Question # 26...Do you favor or opposed subleasing?
There were 100 responses. The question is misleading. We are in agreement
we do not want subleasing on a general basis, because we do not want the
park owners to "double rent". The Ordinance that was enacted in H.B., was
for emergency reasons. The question may have had a different answer if it
had been phrased properly: "In general, do you favor or oppose emergency
subleasing of mobile homes within your park".
Question # 15....Compared to amenities in the park how fair is the rent?
36.8% responded very fair. The remaining categories, Somewhat fair, some
what unfair and very unfair should have been grouped together, because the
term somewhat fair indicates a problem. Therefore, the responses that were
d
page 2
other than "very fair" would have been 59%.
Question #16....Compared to cost of housing, is the rent fair?
What does that mean? Stick built? Condo's? Apartments? How can you get
a meaningful answer when you compare apples and oranges?
Under the heading of Verbatim Summary, Q.#4 was; What are some of the
things you like most about mobile home living?
Only 6.5% cited affordable rent.
Q. # 5 was; What are some of the things you like least about mobile home
living?
23.8% cited rent.
On the question of income, 42.5%refused to answer. Of the remaining 57.5%,( or
230), 46.5% (117) make less than $25,000 a year. 51% of those make less than
$15,000 a year. There is NO WAY these people can keep up with escalating rents.
Additionally, 63.3% of the respondents are female, indicating a lot of widows on
fixed incomes.
It is important to note that we all like mobile home living. The opposite of happy is
not unhappy. Just because we are not happy with every aspect of this lifestyle does
not mean we are unhappy as we have been portrayed by the park owners and their
trade organization. I feel safe......I feel "separate......but I constantly worry about
what is going to happen to me in the next three years. Hive on a fixed income of
disability....will I be homeless in the year 2000?
After a thorough review and analysis of the survey, I am convinced that it can be
made to look any way you want it to look. Therefore, it is lacking integrity.
Sandra Cole
Mobile Home Advisory Board
RANCHO DEL REY
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIA110N
INTER SURVEY 1996
Please answer.the,following questions,as'soon as'possible. By doing so you will assist your
Assoeiatiori in addressing the needs of the Homeowner Membership. �cJv,vc. � •"�
Mail or fold and drop off at#90 Bill Bernard. President.or any board member: G i,6 ahxs s�Lbr�rt '
Sullivan #155.�Hodges#340. Barber 0313, Davis#298. Robison #107,
Hetherington#307.,or Turner#347.
Additional copies of this surve_y'may be obtained from the above Board Members. '"'
1. Are you concerned about the yearly rent increase?.............:.............................:....Yes 95%Yo5%
2. Based on the fact that you own your home. do you consider your current rent too high? .
yes 84%No 16%
3. Based on'your current income. could you afford additional rent increases? .........Y"14% No 86%
4. Would you be in favor of a local rent control(protection)ordinance?...................Yes93% No 7%
5. Are you aware of the"excessive(32.50 per month) water connection fee(minimum charge)that
has been collected since Aug 1991?(See Park bulletin lAug91 & 29Dec95)...........Yes 70%No 30%
6. Are you aware of the existence of the Huntington Beach Mobile Home Owners Association?.....
Yes 9 S Wo 5%
7. Are you aware of the existence of the Huntington Beach Mobile Home Review Board?
Yes 67%N. O338
S. Do You know the difference between these two (2) organizations?........................Yes 441No 56%
9. Number of residents in this home _ ONE( 1 )RESIDENT 54%
TWO( 2)RESIDENTS 41%
ViREE(3)RESIDENTS 2e
Please comment on any of the preceding questions, or make further comment on any other topics
that are important to you.
A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF RESIDENTS ( 31%) REPLIED TO THIS SURVEY.
OF THE NUMBER THAT REPLIED, A FURTHER SIGNIFICANT PERCENTA0E(34%1 _
MADE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. SELECTED COMMENT EXAMPLES ARE AVAILABLE.
This survey is anonymous. There is no need to identify yourself,or to sign this form. Your
response is important to us. and will be confidential, therefore numbers only will be made to the
members of Rancho Del Rey Homeowners Association.
AS A RESULTS OF THIS SURVB-TWENTY(20)NEW HOUSEHODS JOINED RDRMA
------- --------- ---------- ................................
RANCHO DEL REY HOMEOWNERS ASSOC FOR AN INCREASE OF TWENTY—
Memba hip Dues-S3.00 per residenUS5.00 per household EIGHT (2 8) MEMBERS
NAME: SPACE No,
DUES:Amt __Year Dste Check_Cash Donatba Amt
Make checks out to:Rancho Del Rey Haaoowne:a Assoc.,AW give to Am Butm,Tmasurer.ST 13 (P..v I'm
BECOME A MEMBER-JOIN NOW
LAWRENCE
✓RESEARCH
PUBLIC AFFAIRS • MARKETING
A TELEPHONE SURVEY -OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH MOBILE HOME PARK RESIDENTS
Prepared for
The City of Huntington Beach
October, 1997
#6674
1450 North Tustin Ave.,Suite 150,Santa Ana, CA 92705 • 714/ 558-3725 • Fox 714 /558-0403
Methodology
Between October 16 and 21, 1997, 400 mobile home park residents were
interviewed by telephone in the city of Huntington Beach, California, using the
questionnaire which appears in the following section. Respondents were asked 51
question items, which included 7 open-ended questions, and the average interview
lasted approximately 12 minutes.
Results from a study of this size have a margin of error (95 times out of 100) of
t 5.0 percentage points from the result which would be obtained if literally every
individual in the population of interest were interviewed. This margin of error applies to
aggregate results in the range of 40% to 60%. For results that are higher than 60% or
lower than 40%, the margin of error is proportionately smaller.
Creative work for this survey was done by Gary C. Lawrence of Lawrence
Research.
We wish to thank the City of Huntington Beach for commissioning this research
with our firm. We stand ready to assist in the further interpretation or implementation of
the results.
Years in Mobile Home Parks
How long have you lived in your current mobile home park?
Out of your whole life, how many years have you lived in mobile home
parks in total?
Current Mobile Home Park Mobile Home Parks During Life
Less than 3 years 2 3 years to less than 5 6
'3 years to less than 5 6 5 years to less than 10 29
5 years to less than 10 32 10 years to less than 15 17
10 years to less than 15 16 15 years to less than 25 26
15 years to less than 25 28 25 years to less than 40 19
More than 25 years 17 40 years or more 2
No Opinion/Refused * No Opinion / Refused 1
Qs. 1 & 2
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
. - Satisfaction With
Mobile Home Park Living
Generally speaking, how satisfied are you with mobile home park living ...
very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied or very
dissatisfied?
Very satisfied 67
Somewhat satisfied 25
Somewhat dissatisfied 6
r
Very dissatisfied 3
No Opinion 1
0.3
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October T7/ #6674
t : - Like Most/Least
About Mobile Home Park Living
First of all, what are some of the things you like most about mobile home
park living?
And what are some of the things you like least about mobile home park
living?
Like Most Like Least
Nice Neighbors/People 36 Rent/Expense 24
Safe 24 Outside Space 8
Amenities/Services 20 Rules 8
No Upkeep 12 Management/Owners 6
Quiet 9 Neighbors/People 5
"Location 8 Children Allowed 4
Private/Secluded 8 Land Ownership 4
Affordable/Low Rent 7 No Garages 3
Convenient 5 Condition/Quality of Home 3
Maintenance 3 Maintenance 2
Small Community 3 Parking 2
Community Atmosphere 3 New Developments 2
Quality of Home 2 Inside Space 2
Inside Space 2 Noisy 2
Outside Space 2 Pets Allowed 1
Home Ownership 2 Crime/Safety 1
Clean 2 Facilities/Amenities 1
For Seniors 2 Home Values 1
Management 2 Lack of Storage 1
For Families Lack of Privacy 1
Miscellaneous 1 No Pets Allowed 1
Miscellaneous 2
General Positive 5
General Negative 1
Don't Know / No Opinion 5
General Positive 31
Don't Know / No Opinion 3
Qs. 4 & 5
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Acceptability of Various Activities
Think about your current mobile home park in Huntington Beach and please
tell me, for each item I read, whether you feel it is ... very acceptable,
somewhat acceptable, somewhat unacceptable or very unacceptable.
Vry Smw Smw Vry No
Acc Acc Unac Unac Odin
Park maintenance and repairs 65 26 5 4 1
The facilities and the amenities 65 31 2 1 1
The procedures for making rules for the park 41 32 8 7 13
The resolution of problems 42 32 10 6 11
The enforcement of rules and regulations 43 36 12 8 2
Qs. 6-10
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana /October '97/ #6674
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
i RESEARCH Question: 11
PU13LIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 48
0.11 You said that park maintenance and repairs are very unacceptable to you. Would
you elaborate on that? Any examples? (N=16)
Category: Misc
Too many cars parking in the street/Too much junk/Fire hazard.
No one has fixed the street/Chuck holes/Closed down the clubhouse/No lounge.
The road is unacceptable.
No comment.
Parking_
Road repairs/Club and pool facilities.
Things don't look as nice as when they first moved here/Problems aren't looked into/The
properties aren't kept up/Bad lighting.
No opinion.
Pool was broken and they fixed it as fast as they could.
I'm trying to sell my house/No one will buy it because my three neighbors don't take care of their
yard/There are weeds everywhere.
They used to pay for the water and the trash and then we got stuck with it.
1 have security laser that got broken and it took them ten days to repair it.
If the plumbing goes they don't have anything to do with it/iF your car port needs asphalting they
don't have anything to do with it/Pests/People in the streets.
Have not done repairs/Coach now run down.
The streets are never swept/Don't trim the trees over the street/Let kids run wild.
Park is going to be closed down/When there are potholes in the roads and because they are closing
the park they are not fixing these things.
_AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
;:I E S EAR CH Question: 12
PUULIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 49
Q.12 You said that the resolution of problems is very unacceptable to you. Would you
elaborate on that? Any examples?(N=24)
Category. Misc
I have no rights/I don't get listened to.
The management harasses a young couple in the park,and no one will do anything about it.
The resolution brought no answer.
The manager doesn't listen to problems.
They don't try to solve problems.
Animals.
Managers won't work with people.
Nothing is getting done about noisy neighbors.
No comment.
They don't enforce the rules.
Complaints aren't taken care of/People do whatever they want/There are not enough
consequences.
Rent is too high/I can't afford it.
My friend had a gas leak and the manger was mad because I called him to fix it and he was in the
shower.
Showing partiality.
Hard to change places and parks.
There isn't any resolution of problems,the manager decides.
1 was the president of the homeowners association and it was hard to follow through.
Owners won't consider selling to us/I don't think that's really fair after living here for so long/They
ought to give us a break.
Owner was here and decided to close side walks except ours/When the kids were doing damage to
property.
Nothing gets done.
One of the owners told some ladies off,he can't be bothered/ he has other things to do.
Prices, and there is no response for problems.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
IR E S EAR C H question: 2
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 50
Category: Misc
Can't seem to get cooperation with some of the maintenance people/The manager seems to think
that the problem is yours and not theirs.
Do not follow well.
. - - Feelings of Safety
In terms of your own feelings of safety, do you feel your mobile home park
is ... very safe, somewhat safe, somewhat unsafe or very unsafe?
Very safe 70
Somewhat safe 26
Somewhat unsafe 3
Very unsafe 1
No Opinion
Q.13
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana /October '97/ #6674
. - Fairness Issues
Vry Smw Smw Vry No
Fair Fair Unf Unf O in
In general, is your rent ... 38 36 14 12 1
In comparison to the amenities provided by 37 38 12 10 +
your park, is your rent ...
In comparison to the cost of other housing 49 25 9 6 12
in Huntington Beach, is your rent ...
Are the costs of repairs that are passed 33 31 8 5 24
h along to you ...
And are the park rules ... 52 36 8 3 2
Qs. 14-18
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana/ October '97/ #6674
-Owners and Management
If you had a problem concerning your home or your park, how helpful do
you feel the owners and management of your mobile home park would be
... very helpful, somewhat helpful or not very helpful?
Very helpful 50
Somewhat helpful 31
Not very helpful 15
No Opinion 4
h
If you had something you wanted to discuss with the owners or
management of your mobile home park, do you feel you could make an
appointment with them within a reasonable period of time, or not?
Yes 89
No 9
No Opinion 3
Qs. 19-20
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
{ Partiality or Equal Consideration
Here are the opinions of two people, call them Smith and Jones. After I
read them, please tell me whether you are ... strongly like Smith, somewhat
like Smith, somewhat like Jones or strongly like Jones.
Smith feels that the owners and management of his park are giving
preferences or showing partiality to certain tenants that they aren't
giving to others.
Jones feels that the owners and management of his park are trying to
give equal consideration to all tenants and are not intentionally giving
preferences or showing partiality.
Strongly like Smith 9
Somewhat like Smith 11
Somewhat like Jones 24
Strongly like Jones 45
No Opinion 11
0.21
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
- Partiality or Preferences
What partiality or preferences do you feel are being given in your park?
(N=82)
Rent / Lease Terms 13
Rules 12
Management / Owners 6
Parking 5
Repair / Upkeep 5
Pets 4
Communication 2
Families 2
Seniors 2
Non-Seniors 2
Racial Prejudice 2
Miscellaneous 2
General Negative 6
None 17
Don't Know / No Opinion 24
Q.22
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
i - Lease Arrangement
If you were negotiating the terms of your lease again, would you prefer to
have a month-to-month lease, a one-year lease, or more than a one-year
lease?
Month-to-month lease 18
One-year lease 35
More than one-year 23
No Opinion 25
r
0.23
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October T7/ #6674
Reasons for Lease Preferences
And what are the main reasons for your preference for a month-to-month
lease? (N=70)
And what are the main reasons for your preference for this [one year or
more] type of lease? (N=230)
- Month-to-Month One Year or More
Flexibility 30 No Increase Worries 20
Don't Like Leases 16 Security/Stability 17
Things Change 10 One Year Long Enough 10
Easier 7 Easier/Less Trouble 5
Rent Control 6 Steady Rent 3
It's All They Offer 6 Planning Ahead 3
Elderly 3 No Plans to Leave 3
Cheaper 3 Time to Negotiate 3
If Need To Sell 3 Flexible 3
Things Change 3
General Positive 9 Age/Elderly 2
More Fair 2
General Negative 1 In Case of Selling 2
Rules Change 1
Miscellaneous 3 Cost of Living
Park Conditions
No Reasons 3
General Positive 10
Don't Know / No Opinion 3
Miscellaneous 7
Don't Know / No Opinion 8
Qs. 24-25
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
. - Subleasing
As you may know, subleasing is where you own your coach and rent it out
to someone else. In general, do you favor or oppose the subleasing of
mobile homes within your park?
Favor 31
Oppose 54
No Opinion 15
Q.26
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
. - Value of Mobile dome
Do you feel your own mobile home is going up or going down in value?
Going up 18
Going down 62
[VOL:] Staying the same 15
No Opinion 6
Do you feel it is going up mainly because of your mobile home park ... or
the economy in general? (N=71)
Mobile home park 39
Economy in general 51
No Opinion 10
Do you feel it is going down mainly because of your mobile home park ...
or the economy in general? (N=248)
Mobile home park 19
Economy in general 69
No Opinion 11
Qs. 27-29
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Rental Assistance Programs
Have you ever heard or read anything about rental-assistance programs that
assist mobile home park tenants with their rent if they're having difficulty
paying? Are you receiving any such rental assistance?
Yes, aware / Yes, receiving 3
Yes, aware / No, not receiving 38
Yes, aware / No Opinion or Ref 4
No, unaware 56
Q.30
Lawrence Research /Santa Ma / October '97/ #6674
Plans to Stay
Now think again of your own home. How long do you plan to stay in your
present residence?
Less than 3 years 11
3 years to less than 5 3
5 years to less than 10 2
10 years to less than 15 3
15 years to less than 25 2
25 years or more 1
Forever / no plans to move 69
No Opinion / Refused 10
Q.31
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana /October '97/ #6674
Preference for Next Residence
If you were to move to another residence, which of these would be your
preference?
Mobile home 40
Single family detached home 25
Duplex or four-plex 2
Condo 10
Apartment 7
No Opinion 17
Q.32
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Ownership Status
Do you own your residence free and clear, are you paying a mortgage, or
are you renting?
Free and clear 70
Paying mortgage 27
Renting 2
Refused 2
When you financed your home, how easy or difficult was it to find financing
... very easy, somewhat easy, somewhat difficult or very difficult? (N=106)
Very easy 54
Somewhat easy 26
Somewhat difficult 14
Very difficult 4
No Opinion 2
Have you tried to refinance your home, say, within the last five years or so?
And were you able to find refinancing, or not?
Yes / Yes, could find 6
Yes / No, could not find 17
Yes / No Opinion 1
No 76
No Opinion 0
Qs. 33-35
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Primary or Secondary Residence -
Is this home your primary or secondary residence?
Primary 98
Secondary 1
Refused 1
Q.36
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
. - Park Preference
If you had your preference, would you rather live in a family park or a senior
park?
Family park 19
Senior park 76
No Opinion 6
Q.37
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Mobile Home Owners Association-
Are you presently a member of a mobile home owners association?
Yes 47
No 51
Refused 2
Q.38
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana/ October '97/ #6674
. - Household Composition
Counting yourself, how many people live in your home?
One 44
Two 43
Three 8
Four 4
_ Five
Six or more
Refused 1
Are there any children under the age of 18 in your home?
Yes 9
Are any of them teenagers?
Yes 5
Are any of them 12 or under?
Yes 5
Qs. 39-42
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana /October '97/ #6674
i - Age Distribution
What is your age, please?
18-24
25-34 3
35-44 6
45-54 8
55-64 13
65-74 26
75-84 28
85+ 10
Refused 6
Q.43
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
Income Distribution
Counting all your sources of income, what is your total annual household
income before taxes?
Less than $15,000 14
$15,000 to $25,000 13
$25,000 to $35,000 9
$35,000 to $50,000 11
$50,000 to $75,000 8
Over $75,000 3
Refused 43
Q.44
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
- Type of Park
Is your park a family park or a senior park?
Family park 34
Senior park 64
Refused 2
n
Q.46
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
PERSONAL/CONFIDENTIAL N = 400 Mobile Home Park Residents
Huntington Beach
LAWRENCE RESEARCH Project #6674
1450 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite 150 Time Started
Santa Ana, California 92701 Time Ended
Field: October 16-21, 1997
Hello, this is calling for [NAME FROM SAMPLING SHEET]. (WHEN CORRECT
PERSON IS ON THE LINE:) Hello, I'm of Lawrence Research, a national
research firm. We're conducting a survey of residents in Huntington Beach mobile home parks and
asking them questions about life in mobile home parks in Huntington Beach. May I have just a few
minutes of your time so I can include your opinions? (IF NEEDED: I am not selling anything. This
is a legitimate public opinion poll.)
1. How long have you lived in your current Less than 3 years . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
mobile park home? 3 years to less than 5 . . . . . . . . . . 6
5 years to less than 10 . . . . . . . . 32
10 years to less than 15 . .. . . . . 16
15 years to less than 25 . . . . . . . 28
More than 25 years . . . . . . . . . . 17
[NO OPIN / REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . *
2. Out of your whole life, how many years have Less than 3 years . . .... . . . . . . . . 1
you lived in mobile home parks in total? 3 years to less than 5 :`: . . . . . . . . 6
5 years to less than 10 . . . . . . . . 29
10 years to less than 15 . . . . . . . 17
15 years to less than 25 . . . . . . . 26
25 years to less than 40 . . . . . . . 19 r
40 years or more . . . . ... . . . . . . . 2
[NO OPIN / REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . 1
3. Generally speaking, how satisfied are you with mobile home park living ... very satisfied,
somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied or very dissatisfied?
Very satisfied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Somewhat satisfied . . . . . . . . . . 25
Somewhat dissatisfied . . . . . . . . . 6
Very dissatisfied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Now let's talk about what you like most and like least about mobile home park living.
4. First of all, what are some of the things you like most about mobile home park living?
(PROBE FOR MULTIPLE MENTIONS)
#6674 (2)
5. And what are some of the things you like least about mobile home park living? (PROBE FOR
MULTIPLE MENTIONS)
Think about your current mobile home park in Huntington Beach and please tell me, for each item
read, whether you feel it is ... very acceptable, somewhat acceptable, somewhat unacceptable or
very unacceptable. (READ IN RANDOM ORDER)
Vry Smw Smw Vry [NO
Acc Acc Unacc Unacc OPIN1
6. Park maintenance and repairs 65 26 5 4 1
7. The facilities and the amenities 65 31 2 1 1
8. The procedures for making rules for the park 41 32 8 7 13
9. The resolution of problems 42 32 10 6 11
10. The enforcement of rules and regulations 43 36 12 8 2
IF VERY UNACCEPTABLE IN Q 6, ASK: (N=16)
11. You said that park maintenance and repairs are very unacceptable to you. Would you
elaborate on that? Any examples? (PROBE)
r
IF VERY UNACCEPTABLE IN Q 9, ASK: (N=24)
12. You said that the resolution of problems is very unacceptable to yod. Would you
elaborate on that? Any examples? (PROBE)
13. In terms of your own feelings of safety, do you feel your mobile home park is ... very safe,
somewhat safe, somewhat unsafe or very unsafe?
Very safe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Somewhat safe . . . . . . . ... . . . . 26
Somewhat unsafe . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Very unsafe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *
#6674 (3)
14. In general, is your rent ... very fair, somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
Very fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Somewhat fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Somewhat unfair . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Very unfair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
15. In comparison to the amenities provided by your park, is your rent...very fair, somewhat fair,
somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
Very fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Somewhat fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Somewhat unfair . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Very unfair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
16. In comparison to the cost of other housing in Huntington Beach, is your rent ... very fair,
somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
Very fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Somewhat fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Somewhat unfair . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Very unfair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fi
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
17. Are the costs of repairs that are passed along to you ... very fair, somewhat fair, somewhat
unfair, or very unfair?
Very fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Somewhat fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Somewhat unfair . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Very unfair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . .... . . . . . . 24
18. And are the park rules ... very fair, somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
Very fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Somewhat fair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Somewhat unfair . . . . . . . . 8
Very unfair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
19. If you had a problem concerning your home or your park, how helpful do you feel the owners
and management of your mobile home park would be ... very helpful, somewhat helpful or
not very helpful?
Very helpful . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 50
Somewhat helpful . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Not very helpful . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
20. If you had something you wanted to discuss with the owners or management of your mobile
home park, do you feel you could make an appointment with them within a reasonable period
of time, or not?
Yes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
#6674 (4)
21. Here are the opinions of two people, call them Smith and Jones. After I read them, please
tell me whether you are ... strongly like Smith, somewhat like Smith, somewhat like Jones or
strongly like Jones.
Smith feels that the owners and management of his park are giving preferences or showing
partiality to certain tenants that they aren't giving to others.
Jones feels that the owners and management of his park are trying to give equal consider-
ation to all tenants and are not intentionally giving preferences or showing partiality.
Strongly like Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Somewhat like Smith . . . . . . . . . 11
Somewhat like Jones . . . . . . . . . 24
Strongly like Jones . . . . . . . . . . . 45
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
IF STRONGLY OR SOMEWHAT LIKE SMITH (CATEGORIES 1 OR 2), ASK: (N=82)
22. What partiality or preferences do you feel are being given in your park? (PROBE)
23. If you were negotiating the terms of your lease again, would you prefer to have a month-to-
month lease, a one-year lease, or more than a one-year lease?
Month-to-month lease . . . . . . . . . 18
One-year lease . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
More than one-year . . . . . . . . . . 23
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
IF MONTH-TO-MONTH, ASK: (N=70)
24. And what are the main reasons for your preference for a month-to�nonth lease?
(PROBE)
#6674 (5)
IF ONE YEAR OR MORE THAN ONE YEAR LEASE, ASK: (N=230)
25. And what are the main reasons for your preference for this type of lease? (PROBE)
26. As you may know,subleasing is where you own your coach and rent it out to someone else.
In general, do you favor or oppose the subleasing of mobile homes within your park?
Favor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Oppose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
27. Do you feel your own mobile home is going up or going down in value?
Going up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Going down . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
[VOL:] Staying the same . . . . . . . 1-5
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
IF GOING UP, ASK: (N=71)
28. Do you feel it is going up mainly because of(ROTATE) your mobile home park ... or
the economy in general?
Mobile home park . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Economy in general . . . . . . . . . . 51
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
IF GOING DOWN, ASK: (N=248)
29. Do you feel it is going down mainly because of(ROTATE) your mobile home park ...
or the economy in general?
Mobile home park . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Economy in general . . . . . . . . . . 69
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
30. Have you ever heard or read anything about rental-assistance programs that assist mobile
home park tenants with their rent if they're having difficulty paying? (IF YES,ASK:) Are you
receiving any such rental assistance?
Yes, aware /Yes, receiving . . . . . . 3
Yes, aware / No, not receiving . . 38
Yes, aware / [NO OPIN OR REF] . 4
No, unaware . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 56
#6674 (6)
31. Now think again of your own home. How long do you plan to stay in your present residence?
Less than 3 years . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3 years to less than 5 . . . . . . . . . . 3
5 years to less than 10 . . . . . . . . . 2
10 years to less than 15 . . . . . . . . 3
15 years to less than 25 . . . . . . . . 2
25 years or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Forever/ no plans to move . . . . . 69
[NO OPIN / REFUSED] . . . . . . . . 10
32. If you were to move to another residence, which of these would be your preference?
Mobile home . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Single family detached home . . . 25
Duplex or fourplex . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Condo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Apartment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
And a few questions for statistical purposes...
33. Do you own your residence free and Free and clear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
clear, are you paying a mortgage, or Paying mortgage . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
are you renting? Renting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
IF PAYING MORTGAGE, ASK: (N=106)
34. When you financed your home, how easy or difficult was it to find financing ... very
easy, somewhat easy, somewhat difficult or very difficult?
Very easy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Somewhat easy . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Somewhat difficult . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Very difficult . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
35. Have you tried to refinance your home,say, within the last five years or so? (IF YES,
ASK:) And were you able to find refinancing, or not?
Yes /Yes, could find . . . . . . . . . . 6
Yes / No, could not find . . . . . . . 17
Yes / [NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . 1
No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0
36. Is this home your primary or secondary Primary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
residence? Secondary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
37. ' If you had your preference, would you rather Family park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
live in a family park or a senior park? Senior park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
[NO OPINION] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
#6674 (7)
38. Are you presently a member of a mobile home Yes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
owners association? No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
39. Counting yourself, how many people live One . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
in your home? Two . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Three . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Four . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Five . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *
Six or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
IF MORE THAN ONE, ASK: (N=223)
40. Are there any children under the age of 18 in your home?
Yes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
IF YES, ASK: (N=34) _
41. Are any of them teenagers? Yes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
42. Are any of them 12 or under? Yes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
43. What is your age, please? 18-24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25-34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
35-44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
45-54 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
55-64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
65-74 . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 26
75-84 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
85+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
44. Counting all your sources of income, Less than $15,000 . . . . . . . . . . . 14
what is your total annual household $15,000 to $25,000 . . . . . . . . . . 13
income before taxes? (READ $25,000 to $35,000 . . . . . . . . . . . 9
CATEGORIES IF NECESSARY) $35,000 to $50,000 . . . . . . . . . . 11
$50,000 to $75,000 . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Over $75,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
45. And what is your zip code?
#6674 (8)
46. Is your park a family park or a Family park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
senior park? Senior park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
47. Has anyone told you that you might be Yes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
getting this interview call? No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
[REFUSED] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
48. POST CODE: SEX Male . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Female . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
49. POST CODE: SAMPLE SEGMENT
That completes our interview. May I have your first name in case my supervisor needs to verify that
this interview actually took place?
50. FIRST NAME:
51. PHONE: /
Thank you for talking with us today.
INTERVIEWER CERTIFICATION: I have re-read this completed questionnaire and certify that all
questions requiring answers have been appropriately filled in and that this interview has been
obtained from the individual designated.
INTERVIEWER DATE
NOTE: This interview is the property solely of Lawrence Research. Any attempt to duplicate or sell
the contents constitutes an illegal act and is subject to prosecution.
Lawrence Research Aggregate Results Page 1
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 1: How Long at Current Residence N %
1. Less Than 3 Years 6 1.5
2. 3 Years To Less Than 5 23 5.8
3. 5 Years To Less Than 10 129 32.3
4. 10 Years To Less Than 15 62 15.5
5. 15 Years To Less Than 25 113 28.3
6. More Than 25 Years 66 16.5
7. No Opinion / Refused 1 0.3
400
Q. 2: Total Time In Mobile Home Parks N
1. Less Than 3 Years 5 1.3
2. 3 Years To Less Than 5 23 5.8
3. 5 Years To Less Than 10 11.4 28.5
4. 10 Years To Less Than 15 66 16.5
5. 15 Years To Less Than 25 105 26.3
6. 25 Years To Less Than 40 76 19. 0
7. 40 Years Or More 8 2.0
8. No Opinion / Refused 3 0.8
400
Q. 3: Satisfaction With Mobile Home Park Living N
1. Very Satisfied 2,66 66.5
2. Somewhat Satisfied '98 24.5
3. Somewhat Dissatisfied 22 5.5
4. Very Dissatisfied 12 3 .0
5. No Opinion 2 0.5
400
Q. 4: Like Most About Mobile Home Park Living
(See Verbatim Responses)
Q. 5: Like Least About Mobile Home Park Living
(See Verbatim Responses)
Q. 6: Park Maintenance and Repairs N
1. Very Acceptable 258 64.5
2. Somewhat Acceptable 104 26.0
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 18 4.5
4. Very Unacceptable 16 4.0
5. No Opinion 4 1. 0
400
Lawrence Research Aggregate Results Page 2
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 7: Facilities and Amenities N
1. Very Acceptable 260 65. 0
2. Somewhat Acceptable 124 31. 0
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 7 1.8
4. Very Unacceptable 5 1. 3
5. No Opinion 4 1.0
400
Q. 8: Procedures For Making Rules For the Park N
1. Very Acceptable 162 40.5
2. Somewhat Acceptable 128 32 . 0
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 30 7. 5
4. Very Unacceptable 27 6.8
5. No Opinion 53 13 . 3
400
Q. 9: Resolution of Problems N
1. Very Acceptable .-166 41. 5
2. Somewhat Acceptable 128 32 . 0
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 38 9. 5
4. Very Unacceptable 24 6. 0
5. No Opinion 44 11. 9
400
Q. 10: Enforcement of Rules and Regulations N
1. Very Acceptable 171 42.8
2. Somewhat Acceptable 142 35. 5 .
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 47 11.8
4. Very Unacceptable 31 7 .8
5. No Opinion 9 2 .3
400
Q. 11: Why Are Park Maintenance And Repairs Unacceptable
(See Verbatim Responses)
Q. 12: Why Is Resolution of Problems Unacceptable
(See Verbatim Responses)
Lawrence Research Aggregate Results Page 3
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 13: How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Park N %
1. Very Safe 278 69.5
2. Somewhat Safe 104 26.0
3. Somewhat Unsafe 12 3 .0
4. Very Unsafe 5 1.3
5. No Opinion 1 0.3
400
Q. 14: How Fair Is Your Rent N %
1. Very Fair 151 37.8
2. Somewhat Fair 145 36.3
3. Somewhat Unfair 55 13 .8
4. Very Unfair 46 11.5
5. No Opinion -3 0.8
400
Q. 15: Compared to Amenities in Park How Fair Is Rent N
1. Very Fair •-147 36.8
2. Somewhat Fair 149 37.3
3. Somewhat Unfair 48 12.0
4. Very Unfair 39 9.8
5. No Opinion 17 4.,3
400
Q. 16: Compared To Cost Of Housing Is Rent Fair N
1. Very Fair 194 48.5
2. Somewhat Fair 100 25.0
3. Somewhat Unfair 35 8.8
4. Very Unfair 25 6.3
5. No Opinion 46 11.5
400
Q. 17: How Fair Are The Costs Of Repairs N %
1. Very Fair 132 33.0
2. Somewhat Fair 123 30-.8
3. Somewhat Unfair 31 7.8
4. Very Unfair 18 4. 5
5. No Opinion 96 24.0
400
Lawrence Research Aggregate Results Page 4
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 18: How Fair Are The Park Rules N %
1. Very Fair 206 51.5
2. Somewhat Fair 144 36.0
3. Somewhat Unfair 31 7.8
4. Very Unfair 13 3. 3
5. No Opinion 6 1.5
400
Q. 19: How Helpful Would Owners/Management Be With Problems
N %
1. Very Helpful 200 50. 0
2. Somewhat Helpful 125 31.3
3. Not Very Helpful 58 14 .5
4. No Opinion 17 4.3
400
Q. 20: Appointments Available in Reasonable Time Period N
1. Yes 355 88.8
2. No 34 8.5
3. No Opinion 11 2 .8
400
Q. 21: Smith Feels Partiality / Jones Feels Equality N
1. Strongly Like Smith 37 9.3
2. Somewhat Like Smith 45 11. 3
3. Somewhat Like Jones 95 23 .8
4. Strongly Like Jones -179 44. 8 _
5. No Opinion 44 11.0
400
Q. 22: What Partiality Or Preferences Are In Your Park
(See Verbatim Responses)
Q. 23: How Would You Renegotiate Your Lease N %
1. Month-To-Month Lease 70 17. 5
2. One-Year Lease 140 35.0
3. More Than One-Year 90 22. 5
4. No Opinion 100 25. 0
400
Lawrence Research Aggregate Results Page 5
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 24: Why Would You Prefer A Month-To-Month Lease
(See Verbatim Responses)
Q. 25: Why Prefer One-Year to More Than One-Year Lease
(See Verbatim Responses)
Q. 26: Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Your Park N
1. Favor 122 30.5
2. Oppose 217 54.3
3. No Opinion 61 15.3
400
Q. 27: Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Or Down In Value N $
1. Going Up 7-1 17.8
2. Going Down 248 62.0
3. Staying The Same 58 14.5
4. No Opinion 23 5.8
400
Q. 28: Is It Going Up Because Of Your Park Or The Economy N
1. Mobile Home Park 28 39.4
2. Economy In General 36 50.7
3. No Opinion 7 9.9
71
Q. 29: Going Down Because Of Your Park Or The Economy N 's
1. Mobile Home Park . 48 19.4
2. Economy In General 172 69.4
3. No Opinion 28 11.3
248
Q. 30: Heard Of/Receive Assistance Programs For MHP Tenants
N
1. Yes, Aware / Yes Receiving 10 2.5
2. Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 151 37.8
3. Yes, Aware / No Opinion Or Refused 14 3.5
4. No, Unaware 225 56.3
400
Lawrence Research Aggregate Results Page 6
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 31: How Long Do You Plan To Stay In Your Present Home N %
1. Less Than 3 Years 45 11.3
2. 3 Years To Less Than 5 11 2.8
3. 5 Years To Less Than 10 9 2.3
4. 10 Years To Less Than 15 11 2.8
5. 15 Years To Less Than 25 7 1.8
6. 25 Years Or More 3 0.8
7. Forever / No Plans To Move 275 68. 8
8. No Opinion / Refused 39 9.8
400
Q. 32: What Type Of Residence Would You Prefer N %
1. Mobile Home 159 39.8
2. Single Family Detached Home 10.1 25.3
3. Duplex Or Fourplex 7 1.8
4. Condo 38 9. 5
5. Apartment 28 7. 0
6. No Opinion 67 16. 8
-400
Q. 33: Rent, Own Free and Clear or Mortgage Residence N
1. Free and Clear 280 70. 0
2. Paying Mortgage 106 26.5
3. Renting - 8 2. 0
4. Refused 6 1.5
400
Q. 34: How Easy Or Difficult Was Financing Your Home _ N
1. Very Easy 57 53 .8
2. Somewhat Easy 28 26.4
3. Somewhat Difficult 15 14.2
4. Very Difficult 4 3. 8
5. No Opinion 2 1.9
106
Lawrence Research Aggregate Results Page 7
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 35: Found Refinancing in Last Five Years N %
1. Yes / Yes, Could Find 6 5.7
2. Yes / No, Could Not Find 18 17.0
3. Yes / No Opinion 1 0.9
4. No 81 76. 4
5. No Opinion 0 0.0
106
Q. 36: Primary or Secondary Residence N %
1. Primary 392 98.0
2. Secondary 5 1.3
3. Refused 3 0.8
400
Q. 37: Prefer to Live in Family or Senior Park N %
1. Family Park 76 19. 0
2. Senior Park 302 75.5
3. No Opinion 22 5.5
400
Q. 38: Member of a Mobile Home Owners Association N % y
1. Yes 189 47.3
2. No 204 51.0
3. Refused 7 1.8
400
Q. 39: How Many People Live In Your Home N %
1. One 177 44.3
2. Two 171 42.8
3. Three 33 8.3
4. Four 14 3 .5
5. Five 1 0.3
6. Six Or More 1 0.3
7. Refused 3 0.8
400
Lawrence Research Aggregate Results Page 8
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 40: Children Under Age 18 N %
1. Yes 34 15.2
2. No 187 83 .9
3. Refused 2 0.9
223
Q. 41: Teenagers N
1. Yes 18 52.9
2. No 15 44. 1
3. Refused 1 2 .9
34
Q. 42: Children 12 Or Under N
1. Yes 20 58 .8
2. No 13 38.2
3. Refused 1 2.9
34
Q. 43: Age N
1. 18-24 1 0.3
r
2. 25-34 10 2. 5
3. 35-44 24 6. 0
4. 45-54 31 7.8 "
5. 55-64 52 13. 0
6. 65-74 104 26.0
7. 75-84 112 28. 0
8. 85+ . 41 10. 3
9. Refused 25 6.3
400
Q. 44: Income N %
1. Less Than $15,000 54 13 .5
2. $15,000 To $25,000 53 13 . 3
3. $25,000 To $35,000 37 9.3
4. $35,000 To $50,000 42 10.5
5. $50,000 To $75,000 31 7. 8
6. Over $75,000 13 3 .3
7. Refused 170 42.5
400
Lawrence Research Aggregate Results Page 9
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 45: Zip Code
(Misc Data Response)
Q. 46: Current Residence: Family Park or Senior Park N
1. Family Park 135 33.8
2. Senior Park 257 64. 3
3. Refused 8 2.0
400
Q. 47: Has Anyone Told You You Might Be Interviewed N
1. Yes 7 1.8
2. No 387 96.8
3. Refused 6 1. 5
400
Q. 48: Gender N $
1. Male 147 36.8
2. Female .253 63. 3
400
Q. 49: Sample Segment
(Misc Data Response)
Q. 50: Phone
(Misc Data Response)
Q. 51: How Long at Current Residence / C Q. 1 N
1. Less Than 5 Years 29 7. 3
2. 5 Years to Less Than 10 129 32. 3
3. 10 Years to Less Than 15 62 15.5
4. 15 Years to Less Than 25 113 28. 3
5. More Than 25 Years 66 16.5
6. No Opinion / Refused 1 0.3
400
Lawrence Research Aggregate Results Page 10
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 52: Total Time in Mobile Home Parks / C Q.2 N
1. Less Than 5 Years 28 7. 0
2. 5 Years to Less Than 10 114 28.5
3 . 10 Years to Less Than 15 66 16.5
4. 15 Years to Less Than 25 105 26.3
5. 25 Years or More 84 21.0
6. No Opinion / Refused 3 0.8
400
Q. 53: How Many People Live in Home / C Q.39 N
1. One 177 44. 3
2. Two 171 42 .8
3 . Three or More 49 12 . 3
4. Refused 3 0.8
400
Q. 54: Age / C Q.43 N
1. 18-44 35 8.8
2. 45-54 31 7.8
3 . 55-64 52 13 . 0
4. 65-74 104 26. 0
5. 75-84 112 28. 0
6. 85+ 41 10.1
7. Refused 25 6.3
4.00
Q. 55: Income / C Q.44 N
1. Less Than $15,000 - 54 13 .5-
2. $15,000 to $25,000 53 13 . 3
3. $25,000 to $35,000 37 9. 3
4. $35,000 to $50,000 42 10.5
5. $50,000 or More 44 11. 0
6. Refused 170 42.5
400
GROSSTABS FORMAT EXPLANATION
The crosstabs for each question are shown on a single page. The actual question
wording used as well as the aggregate results are shown at the top of the page, as can
be seen in the example below:
0.9: Smith Job Approval
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Robert Smith is handling his job as U.S. Senator?
1. Strongly Approve 9
2. Somewhat Approve 37
3. Somewhat Disapprove 8
4. Strongly Disapprove 2
5. No Opinion 44
Format 1+2/3+4
Rank 1+2, 3+4
Approve Smith **- 0 Disapprove Smith 0**
Smith Favor 85- 4 Smith Unfavor 16-74
Capital City 71- 8 Slightly Liberal 37-18
Smith Voters 69- 4 Jones Unfavor 55-18
East Euphoria 65-11 Independent/Other 37-17
Central Lakes 63-11 Jones Voters 40-16
Farms and Rural 62-14 Jones Favor 60-16
Jones Favor 60-16 Farms and Rural 62-14
North Euphoria 58-10 Undecided Voters 31-12
Jones Unfavor 55-18 55-64 48-12
Slightly Consery 53-11 Men 48-12
Republicans 53-8 Voted in Special 52-12
Quite Consery 52-4 Lo Prob Voters 43-12
Quite Liberal 52-9 Democrats 42-11
Voted in Special 52-12 Central Lakes 63-11
35-44 51-10 Slightly Consery 53-11
Med Prob Voters 49-11 East Euphoria 65-11
The crosstabs are shown in one, two or three columns. The numbers are the same in
each column; they are simply rank ordered on different categories to highlight which
groups score highest and lowest on these different categories.
In the example on the previous page, there are two columns, or rank orderings.
Format indicates which category results are presented for each subgroup. In the
present present example, the numbers shown are categories 1 + 2 added together (the
first number) and categories 3 + 4 added together (the second number).
Rank indicates which crosstab number the groups are rank ordered on. The first
number is 1 + 2. This means that the rank ordering of the first column is based upon
how each group answered categories 1 + 2. They are rank ordered from a high of 85
to a low of 49 in the numbers shown. The second number is 3 + 4. This means that
the rank ordering of the second column is based upon how each group answered
categories 3 + 4. These are ranked by a high of 74 to a low of 11 in the numbers
shown.
When there are additions of two or more categories, the categories are added together
including tenths of a percent. Then the total is rounded. Sometimes two categories
might individually be 33.3 and 30.4 and be shown in the heading separately as 33 and
30, but be shown in the column of groups as 64.
Lawrence Research Column Groups And Cell Sizes Page 1
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
MC 1 Cell
Group Size Derived From
Q. 33: Rent, Own Free and Clear or Mortgage Residence
Free and Clear 280 1. Free and Clear
Paying Mortgage 106 2. Paying Mortgage
Q. 40: Children Under Age 18
Kids in HH 34 1. Yes
Q. 46: Current Residence: Family Park or Senior Park
Res: Family PK 135 1. Family Park
Res: Senior PK 257 2. Senior Park
Q. 48: Gender
Men 147 1. Male
Women 253 2. Female
Q. 51: How Long at Current Residence / C Q.1
* Res: < 5 Years 29 1. Less Than 5 Years
Res: 5 to < 10 129 2. 5 Years to Less Than 10
Res: 10 to < 15 62 3. 10 Years to Less Than 15
Res: 15 to < 25 113 4. 15 Years to Less Than 25
Res: 25+ Years 66 5. More Than 25 Years
Q. 52: Total Time in Mobile Home Parks / C Q.2
*MHP: < 5 Years 28 1. Less Than 5 Years
MHP: 5 to < 10 114 2. 5 Years to Less Than 10
MHP: 10 < 15 66 3. 10 Years to Less Than 15
MHP: 15 to < 25 105 4. 15 Years to Less Than 25
MHP: 25+ Years 84 5. 25 Years or More
Q. 53: How Many People Live in Home / C Q.39
No. In HH: One 177 1. One _
No. In HH: Two 171 2. Two
No. In HH: 3+ 49 3. Three or More
Q. 54: Age / C Q.43
18-44 35 1. 18-44
45-54 31 2. 45-54
55-64 52 3. 55-64
65-74 104 4. 65-74
75-84 112 5. 75-84
85+ 41 6. 85+
Q. 55: Income / C Q.44
Less Than $15K 54 1. Less Than $15,000
$15K to $25K 53 2. $15,000 to $25,000
$25K to $35K 37 3. $25,000 to $35,000
$35K to $50K 42 4. $35,000 to $50,000
$50K or More 44 5. $50,000 or More
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 1
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 3: Satisfaction With Mobile Home Park Living
Generally speaking, how satisfied are you with mobile home park living . . .
very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied or very
dissatisfied?
1. Very Satisfied 67 4. Very Dissatisfied 3
2. Somewhat Satisfied 25 5. No Opinion 1
3. Somewhat Dissatisfied 6
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
$15K to S25K 79-21- 0- 0 18-44 43-43-11- 3 Kids in HH 47-35-15- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 57-29- 4-11
S25K to S35K 78-16- 5- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 47-39-10- 4 MHP: 5 to < 10 54-30-12- 4 less Than S15K 52-33- 6- 9
85+ 76-17- 2- 5 Res: Family PK 50-37- 8- 4 18-44 43-43-11- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 59-31- 3- 7
MHP: 15 to < 25 75-22- 2- 1 45-54 58-35- 6- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 56-28-11- 4 85+ 76-17- 2- 5
Res: Senior PK 75-18- 4- 2 Kids in HH 47-35-15- 3 No. In HH: 3+ 47-39-10- 4 -S35K to S50K 52-33-10- 5
Res: 15 to < 25 74-23- 2- 1 S50K or More 55-34- 9- 2 $35K to $50K 52-33-10- 5 Paying Mortgage 55-32- 8- 5
MHP: 25+ Years 74-23- 1- 2 $35K to S50K 52-33-10- 5 S50K or More 55-34- 9- 2 Res: Family PK 50-37- 8- 4
Res: 25+ Years 73-23- 2- 3 Less Than S15K 52-33- 6- 9 Paying Mortgage 55-32- 8- 5 No. in HH: 3+ 47-39-10- 4
75-84 72-19- 4- 4 55-64 62-33- 2- 4 Res: Family PK 50-37- 8- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 56-28-11- 4
No. In HH: Two 71-22- 4- 2 Paying Mortgage 55-32- 8- 5 65-74 68-21- 7- 3 55-64 - 62-33- 2- 4
Res: 10 to < 15 71-19- 6- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 59-31- 3- 7 45-54 58-35- 6- 0 75-84 72-19- 4- 4
Free and Clear 70-22- 4- 3 MHP: 5 to < 10 54-30-12- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 71-19- 6- 3 Women 67-23- 6- 4
65-74 68-21- 7- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 57-29- 4-11 MHP: 10 < 15 68-21- 6- 3 MHP: 5 to < 10 54-30-12- 4
MHP: 10 < 15 68-21- 6- 3 Res: 5 to < 10 56-28-11- 4 Women 67-23- 6- 4 No. In HH: One 67-24- 6- 3
Women 67-23- 6- 4 Men 66-27- 5- 2 No. In HH: One 67-24- 6- 3 Res: 10 to < 15 71-19- 6- 3
No. In HH: One 67-24- 6- 3 Aggregate 67-25- 6- 3 Less Than S15K 52-33- 6- 9 MHP: 10 < 15 68-21- 6- 3
Aggregate 67-25- 6- 3 No. In HH: One 67-24- 6- 3 Aggregate 67-25- 6- 3 Res: 25+ Years 73-23- 2- 3
Men 66-27- 5- 2 Women 67-23- 6- 4 S25K to $35K 78-16- 5- 0 Aggregate 67-25- 6- 3
55-64 62-33- 2- 4 Res: 15 to < 25 74-23- 2- 1 Men 66-27- 5- 2 Kids in HH 47-35-15- 3
* Res: < 5 Years 59-31- 3- 7 Res: 25+ Years 73-23- 2- 3 75-84 72-19- 4- 4 65-74 68-21- 7- 3
45-54 58-35- 6- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 74-23- 1- 2 Free and Clear 70-22- 4- 3 18-44 43-43-11- 3
*MHP: < 5 Years 57-29- 4-11 Free and Clear 70-22- 4- 3 Res: Senior PK 75-18- 4- 2 Free and Clear 70-22- 4- 3
Res: 5 to < 10 56-28-11- 4 MHP: 15 to < 25 75-22- 2- 1 No. In HH: Two 71-22- 4- 2 MHP: 25+ Years 74-23- 1- 2
Paying Mortgage 55-32- 8- 5 No. In HH: Two 71-22- 4- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 57-29- 4-11 No. In HH: Two 71-22t 4- 2
S50K or More 55-34- 9- 2 MHP: 10 < 15 68-21- 6- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 59-31- 3- 7 Res: Senior PK 75-18- 4- 2
MHP: 5 to < 10 54-30-12- 4 65-74 68-21- 7- 3 85+ 76-17- 2- 5 S50K or More 55-34- 9- 2
S35K to $50K 52-33-10- 5 $15K to S25K 79-21- 0- 0 55-64 62-33- 2- 4 Men 66-27- 5= 2
Less Than $15K 52-33- 6- 9 Res: 10 to < 15 71-19- 6- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 75-22- 2- 1 MHP: 15 to < 25 75-22- 2- 1
Res: Family PK 50-37- 8- 4 75-84 72-19- 4- 4 Res: 15 to < 25 74-23- 2- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 74-23- 2- 1
Kids in HH 47-35-15- 3 Res: Senior PK 75-18- 4- 2 Res: 25+ Years 73-23- 2- 3 45-54 58-35- 6- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 47-39-10- 4 85+ 76-17- 2- 5 MHP: 25+ Years 74-23- 1- 2 S25K to S35K 78-16- 5- 0
18-44 43-43-11- 3 S25K to S35K 78-16- 5- 0 S15K to S25K 79-21- 0- 0 S15K to S25K 79-21- 0- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 2
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 6: Park Maintenance and Repairs
Think about your current mobile home park in Huntington Beach and please
tell me, for each item I read, whether you feel it is . . . very acceptable,
somewhat acceptable, somewhat unacceptable or very unacceptable.
Park maintenance and repairs
1. Very Acceptable 65 4. Very Unacceptable 4
2. Somewhat Acceptable 26 5. No opinion 1
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 5
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
« Res: < 5 Years 76-21- 3- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 53-41- 2- 4 S50K or More 57-32- 9- 2 45-54 55-32- 0-13
*MHP: < 5 Years 71-25- 4- 0 Kids in HH 53-38- 3- 6 18-44 51-37- 9- 3 S35K to $50K 50-33- 5-12
Res: Senior PK 71-22- 4- 1 18-44 51-37- 9- 3 85+ 66-24- 7- 2 Res: Family PK 52-33- 6-10
Res: 15 to < 25 68-21- 5- 4 $35K to S50K 50-33- 5-12 No. In HH: Two 66-22- 6- 5 $25K to $35K 65-22- 5- 8
SISK to $25K 68-26- 4- 0 Paying Mortgage 58-33- 4- 4 Res: 25+ Years 61-29- 6- 5 Res: 10 to < 15 68-21- 3- 6
Res: 10 to < 15 68-21- 3- 6 Res: Family PK 52-33- 6-10 Res: Family PK 52-33- 6-10 MHP: 10 < 15 65-23- 5- 6
55-64 67-25- 6- 2 Res: 5 to < 10 59-33- 4- 3 55-64 67-25- 6- 2 Kids in HH 53-38- 3- 6
Free and Clear 67-24- 4- 4 45-54 55-32- 0-13 MHP: 15 to < 25 64-24- 6- 5 65-74 64-27- 3- 5
75-84 67-22- 4- 4 S50K or More 57-32- 9- 2 Less Than SISK 63-26- 6- 4 MHP: 15 to < 25 64-24- 6- 5
No. In HH: One 66-26- 3- 3 MHP: 5 to < 10 62-30- 4- 4 S25K to S35K 65-22- 5- 8 No. In HH: Two 66-22- 6- 5
No. In HH: Two 66-22- 6- 5 Res: 25+ Years 61-29- 6- 5 Res: 15 to < 25 68-21- 5- 4 Res: 25+ Years 61-29- 6- 5
85+ 66-24- 7- 2 Men 63-28- 4- 4 $35K to $50K 50-33- 5-12 Res: 15 to < 25 68-21- 5- 4
Women 65-25- 5- 4 MHP: 25+ Years 64-27- 5- 4 MHP: 25+ Years 64-27- 5- 4 Free and Clear 67-24- 4- 4
MHP: 10 < 15 65-23- 5- 6 65-74 64-27- 3- 5 Women 65-25- 5- 4 Men 63-28- 4- 4
S25K to E35K 65-22- 5- 8 SISK to $25K 68-26- 4- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 65-23- 5- 6 No. In HH: 3+ 53-41- 2- 4
Aggregate 65-26- 5- 4 Aggregate 65-26- 5- 4 Aggregate 65-26- 5- 4 Aggregate 65-26- 5- 4
65-74 64-27- 3- 5 No. In HH: One 66-26- 3- 3 75-84 67-22- 4- 4 Women- 65-25- 5- 4.
YHP: 25+ Years 64-27- 5- 4 Less Than S15K 63-26- 6- 4 Free and Clear 67-24- 4- 4 Paying Mortgage 58-33- 4- 4
AHP: 15 to < 25 64-24- 6- 5 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-25- 4- 0 Men 63-28- 4- 4 less Than SISK 63-26- 6- 4
Men 63-28- 4- 4 55-64 67-25- 6- 2 Res: Senior PK 71-22- 4- 1 75-84 67-22- 4- 4
Less Than SISK 63-26- 6- 4 Women 65-25- 5- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 59-33- 4- 3 MHP: 25+ Years 64-27- 5- 4
MHP: 5 to < 10 62-30- 4- 4 85+ 66-24- 7- 2 Paying Mortgage 58-33- 4- 4 MHP: 5 to < 10 62-30- 4- 4
Res: 25+ .Years 61-29- 6- 5 MHP: 15 to < 25 64-24- 6- 5 SISK to $25K 68-26- 4- 0 No. In HH: One 66-26-i 3- 3
Res: 5 to < 10 59-33- 4- 3 Free and Clear 67-24- 4- 4 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-25- 4- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 59-33- 4- 3
Paying Mortgage 58-33- 4- 4 MHP: 10 < 15 65-23- 5- 6 MHP: 5 to < 10 62-30- 4- 4 18-44 51-37- 9- 3
S50K or More 57-32- 9- 2 75-84 67-22- 4- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 76-21- 3- 0 85+ 66-24- 7- 2
45-54 55-32- 0-13 Res: Senior PK 71-22- 4- 1 No. In HH: One 66-26- 3- 3 $50K or More 57-32- 9- 2
No. In HH: 3+ 53-41- 2- 4 No. In HH: Two 66-22- 6- 5 Res: 10 to < 15 68-21- 3- 6 55-64 67-25- 6- 2
Kids in HH 53-38- 3- 6 $25K to $35K 65-22- 5- 8 Kids in HH 53-38- 3- 6 Res: Senior PK 71-22- 4- 1
Res: Family PK 52-33- 6-10 Res: 15 to < 25 68-21- 5- 4 65-74 64-27- 3- 5 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-25- 4- 0
18-44 51-37- 9- 3 Res: 10 to < 15 68-21- 3- 6 No. In HH: 3+ 53-41- 2- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 76-21- 3- 0
S35K to S50K 50-33- 5-12 * Res: < 5 Years 76-21- 3- 0 45-54 55-32- 0-13 SISK tB S25K 68-26- _4- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 3
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 6: Park Maintenance and Repairs
Think about your current mobile home park in Huntington Beach and please
tell me, for each item I read, whether you feel it is . . . very acceptable,
somewhat acceptable, somewhat unacceptable or very unacceptable.
Park maintenance and repairs
1. Very Acceptable 65 4. Very Unacceptable 4
2. Somewhat Acceptable 26 5. No Opinion 1
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 5
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
* Res: < 5 Years 97- 3- 0 S35K to S50K 83-17- 0 75-84 89- 8- 3
*MHP: < 5 Years 96- 4- 0 Res: Family PK 84-16- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 88-10- 2
S15K to $25K 94- 4- 2 $25K to $35K 86-14- 0 Paying Mortgage 91- 8- 2
No. In HH: 3+ 94- 6- 0 45-54 87-13- 0 S15K to $25K 94- 4- 2
Res: Senior PK 93- 5- 2 18-44 89-11- 0 Less Than S15K 89- 9- 2
55-64 92- 8- 0 S50K or More 89-11- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 89-10- 2
MHP: 5 to < 10 92- 7- 1 No. In HH: Two 88-11- 1 Res: Senior PK 93- 5- 2
No. In HH: One 92- 7- 1 Res: 25+ Years 89-11- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 91- 7- 2
MHP: 25+ Years 92- 8- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 88-11- 2 MHP: 10 < 15 88-11- 2
Res: 5 to < 10 91- 7- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 88-10- 2 Women 90- 9- 1
65-74 91- 8- 1 85+ 90-10- 0 No. In HH: Two 88-11- 1
Kids in HH 91- 9- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 89-10- 1 No. In HH: One 92- 7- 1
Men 91- 8- 1 Res: 10 to < 15 89-10- 2 Aggregate 91- 9- 1
free and Clear 91- 9- 1 Less Than $15K 89- 9- 2 65-74 91- 8- 1
Paying Mortgage 91- 8- 2 Kids in HH 91- 9- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 89-10- 1
Aggregate 91- 9- 1 Women 90- 9- 1 MHP: 5 to < 10 92- 7- 1
85+ 90-10- 0 Free and Clear 91- 9- 1 Free and Clear 91- 9- 1
Women 90- 9- 1 Aggregate 91- 9- 1 Men 91- 8- 1
Res: 25+ Years 89-11- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 92- 8- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 97- 3- 0
Res: 15 to < 25 89-10- 1 Men 91- 8- 1 Res: Family PK 84-16- 0
75-84 89- 8- 3 75-84 89- 8- 3 No. In HH: 3+ 94- 6- 0
Less Than S15K 89- 9- 2 65-74 91- 8- 1 18-44 89-11- 0
Res: 10 to < 15 89-10- 2 55-64 92- 8- 0 45-54 87-13- 0 d
S50K or More 89-11- 0 Paying Mortgage 91- 8- 2 55-64 92- 8- 0
18-44 89-11- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 92- 7- 1 MHP: 25+ Years 92- 8- 0
MHP: 10 < 15 88-11- 2 Res: 5 to < 10 91- 7- 2 Kids in HH 91- 9- 0
No. In HH: Two 88-11- 1 No. In HH: One 92- 7- 1 85+ 90-10- 0
MHP: 15 to < 25 88-10- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 94- 6- 0 Res: 25+ Years 89-11- 0
45-54 87-13- 0 Res: Senior PK 93- 5- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 96- 4- 0
$25K to $35K 86-14- 0 S15K to S25K 94- 4- 2 $25K to $35K 86-14- 0
Res: Family PK 84-16- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 96- 4- 0 $35K to $50K 83-17- 0
S35K to S50K 83-17- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 97- 3- 0 S50K or More 89-11- 0 _
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 4
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 7: Facilities and Amenities
The facilities and the amenities
1. Very Acceptable 65 4. Very Unacceptable 1
2. Somewhat Acceptable 31 5. No opinion 1
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 2
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
Res: < 5 Years 83-17- 0- 0 Kids in HH 41-50- 3- 6 18-44 54-37- 6- 3 Kids in HH 41-50- 3- 6
*MHP: < 5 Years 82-18- 0- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 49-45- 2- 4 S15K to S25K 57-40- 4- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 68-26- 2- 5
$50K or More 77-18- 2- 2 Res: Family PK 47-44- 4- 3 Less Than $15K 61-31- 4- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 49-45- 2- 4
S25K to S35K 76-22- 0- 3 S15K to $25K 57-40- 4- 0 Res: Family PK 47-44- 4- 3 45-54 68-29- 0- 3
55-64 75-23- 2- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 58-37- 2- 2 Kids in HH 41-50- 3- 6 Res: 10 to < 15 73-23- 2- 3
Res: Senior PK 74-25- 0- 0 18-44 54-37- 6- 3 MHP: 5 to < 10 60-36- 3- 1 Res: Family PK 47-44- 4- 3
Res: 10 to < 15 73-23- 2- 3 65-74 60-37- 2- 1 85+ 61-34- 2- 0 18-44 54-37- 6- 3
No. In HH: one 68-28- 2- 1 MHP: 5 to < 10 60-36- 3- 1 $35K to S50K 62-36- 2- 0 S25K to $35K 76-22- 0- 3
MHP: 10 < 15 68-26- 2- 5 $35K to S50K 62-36- 2- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 67-30- 2- 0 S50K or More 77-18- 2- 2
Men 68-29- 1- 1 Res: 25+ Years 61-35- 2- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 58-37- 2- 2 Less Than S15K 61-31- 4- 2
45-54 68-29- 0- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 62-34- 1- 1 $50K or More 77-18- 2- 2 Women 63-32- 2- 2
75-84 67-30- 0- 1 85+ 61-34- 2- 0 Free and Clear 65-30- 2- 1 Res: 5 to-< 10 58-37- 2- 2
MHP: 25+ Years 67-30- 2- 0 Paying Mortgage 64-34- 1- 1 No. In HH: 3+ 49-45- 2- 4 Free and Clear 65-30- 2- 1
Res: 15 to < 25 66-30- 2- 1 Women 63-32- 2- 2 Women 63-32- 2- 2 Aggregate 65-31- 2- 1
No. In HH: Two 65-31- 2- 1 Less Than $15K 61-31- 4- 2 65-74 60-37- 2- 1 No. In HH: One 68-28- 2- 1
Free and Clear 65-30- 2- 1 Aggregate 65-31- 2- 1 55-64 75-23- 2- 0 65-74 60-37- 2- 1
Aggregate 65-31- 2- 1 No. in HH: Two 65-31- 2- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 66-30- 2- 1 MHP: 15 to < 25 62-34- 1- 1
Paying Mortgage 64-34- 1- 1 75-84 67-30- 0- 1 No. In HH: Two 65-31- 2- 1 Paying Mortgage 64-34- 1- 1
Women 63-32- 2- 2 Res: 15 to < 25 66-30- 2- 1 Aggregate 65-31- 2- 1 75-84 67-30- 0- 1
MHP: 15 to < 25 62-34- 1- 1 Free and Clear 65-30- 2- 1 No. in HH: One 68-28- 2- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 66-30- 2- 1
S35K to S50K 62-36- 2- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 67-30- 2- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 73-23- 2- 3 MHP: 5 to < 10 60-36- 3- 1
Less Than S15K 61-31- 4- 2 Men 68-29- 1- 1 Res: 25+ Years 61-35- 2- 0 Men 68-29- 1- 1
85+ 61-34- 2- 0 45-54 68-29- 0- 3 MHP: 10 < 15 68-26- 2- 5 No. In HH: Two 65-31- 2- 1
Res: 25+ Years 61-35- 2- 0 No. in HH: One 68-28- 2- 1 Men 68-29- 1- 1 Res: Senior PK 74-25- 0- 0
MHP: 5 to < 10 60-36- 3- 1 MHP: 10 < 15 68-26- 2- 5 MHP: 15 to < 25 62-34- 1- 1 *MHP: < 5 Years 82-18- 0- 0
65-74 60-37- 2- 1 Res: Senior PK 74-25- 0- 0 Paying Mortgage 64-34- 1- 1 55-64 75-23a 2- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 58-37- 2- 2 55-64 75-23- 2- 0 Res: Senior PK 74-25- 0- 0 85+ 61-34- 2- 0
S15K to S25K 57-40- 4- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 73-23- 2- 3 45-54 68-29- 0- 3 Res: 25+ Years 61-35- 2- 0
18-44 54-37- 6- 3 S25K to S35K 76-22- 0- 3 75-84 67-30- 0- 1 S15K to $25K 57-40- 4- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 49-45- 2- 4 $50K or More 77-18- 2- 2 S25K to S35K 76-22- 0- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 83-17- 0- 0
Res: Family PK 47-44- 4- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 82-18- 0- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 83-17- 0- 0 S35K to $50K 62-36- 2- 0
Kids in HH 41-50- 3- 6 * Res: < 5 Years 83-17- 0- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 82-18- 0- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 67-30- 2- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 5
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 7: Facilities and Amenities
The facilities and the amenities
1. Very Acceptable 65 4. Very Unacceptable 1
2. Somewhat Acceptable 31 5. No Opinion 1
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 2
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
*MHP: < 5 Years **- 0- 0 Kids in HH 91- 9- 0 Res: 25+ Years 95- 2- 3
* Res: < 5 Years **- 0- 0 18.44 91- 9- 0 85+ 95- 2- 2
Res: Senior PK 99- 1- 0 Res: Family PK 91- 7- 2 Res: Family PK 91- 7- 2
Paying Mortgage 98- 2- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 94- 6- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 96- 2- 2
55-64 98- 2- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 94- 6- 0 Less Than S15K 93- 6- 2
$35K to $50K 98- 2- 0 Less Than S15K 93- 6- 2 75-64 97- 1- 2
75-84 97- 1- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 95- 5- 0 Free and Clear 95- 4- 1
S25K to S35K 97- 3- 0 S50K or More 95- 5- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 96- 2- 1
Men 97- 2- 1 Res: 5 to < 10 95- 4- 1 Women 95- 4- 1
45-54 97- 3- 0 SISK to $25K 96- 4- 0 No. In HH: Two 96- 2- 1
No. In HH: Two 96- 2- 1 Free and Clear 95- 4- 1 No. In HH: One 96- 3- 1
Res: 15 to < 25 96- 3- 1 Women 95- 4- 1 Aggregate 96- 3- 1
MHP: 25+ Years 96- 2- 1 MHP: 5 to < 10 96- 4- 1 65-74 96- 3- 1
S15K to $25K 96- 4- 0 45-54 97- 3- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 96- 3- 1
MHP: 15 to < 25 96- 2- 2 Aggregate 96- 3- 1 MHP: 5 to < 10 96- 4- 1
65-74 96- 3- 1 65-74 96- 3- 1 Res: 5 to < 10 95- 4- 1
No. In HH: One 96- 3- 1 No. In HH: One 96- 3- 1 Men 97- 2- 1
Aggregate 96- 3- 1 S25K to $35K 97- 3- 0 Res: Senior PK 99- 1- 0
MHP: 5 to < 10 96- 4- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 96- 3- 1 MHP: 10 < 15 94- 6- 0
Res: 25+ Years 95- 2- 3 85+ 95- 2- 2 Kids in HH 91- 9- 0
S50K or More 95- 5- 0 E35K to S50K 98- 2- 0 * Res: < 5 Years **- 0- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 95- 4- 1 MHP: 25+ Years 96- 2- 1 18-44 91- 9- 0
Women 95- 4- 1 No. In HH: Two 96- 2- 1 45-54 97- 3- 0
Res: 10 to < 15 95- 5- 0 Men 97- 2- 1 *MHP: < 5 Years **- 0- 0
85+ 95- 2- 2 55-64 98- 2- 0 Paying Mortgage 98- 2- 0
Free and Clear 95- 4- 1 MHP: 15 to < 25 96- 2- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 95- 5- 0 v
MHP: 10 < 15 94- 6- 0 Paying Mortgage 98- 2- 0 55-64 98- 2- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 94- 6- 0 Res: 25+ Years 95- 2- 3 No. In HH: 3+ 94- 6- 0
Less Than S15K 93- 6- 2 75-84 97- 1- 2 S15K to $25K 96- 4- 0
18-44 91- 9- 0 Res: Senior PK 99- 1- 0 $25K to E35K 97- 3- 0
Kids in HH 91- 9- 0 * Res: < 5 Years **- 0- 0 E35K to S50K 98- 2- 0
Res: Family PK 91- 7- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years **• 0- 0 $50K or More 95- 5- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 6
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 8: Procedures For. Making Rules For the Park
The procedures for making rules for the park
1. Very Acceptable 41 4. Very Unacceptable 7
2. Somewhat Acceptable 32 5. No opinion 13
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 8
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
Res: Senior PK 49-30- 6- 4 S15K to $25K 36-49- 2- 4 18-44 17-43-14- 9 45-54 42-23- 3-19
85+ 49-29- 5- 2 Kids in NH 12-47- 6-15 Res: Family PK 25-36-11-13 Less Than $15K 35-30- 6-15
*MHP: < 5 Years 46-32- 4- 7 18-44 17-43-14- 9 Res: 5 to < 10 39-36-11- 7 Kids in HH 12-47- 6-15
MHP: 25+ Years 46-32- 4- 6 No. In HH: 3+ 20-41- 6-12 MHP: 5 to < 10 40-36-10- 7 S50K or More 45-25- 9-14
55-64 46-25- 8- 6 $35K to S50K 31-38-10-10 S35K to S50K 31-38-10-10 Res: Family PK 25-36-11-13
S50K or More 45-25- 9-14 Paying Mortgage 29-37- 7-11 MHP: 10 < 15 35-32- 9- 8 No. In HH: 3+ 20-41- 6-12
Res: 25+ Years 45-32- 3- 6 65-74 43-37- 7- 5 S50K or More 45-25- 9-14 Paying Mortgage 29-37- 7-11
* Res: < 5 Years 45-31- 3- 3 Res: Family PK 25-36-11-13 No. In HH: Two 43-30- 9- 7 Res: 10 to < 15 35-34- 6-10
Free and Clear 45-31- 8- 5 MHP: 5 to < 10 40-36-10- 7 MHP: 15 to < 25 36-29- 9- 7 S35K to S50K 31-38-10-10
Men 44-33- 6- 3 Res: 5 to < 10 39-36-11- 7 Women 39-31- 8- 9 Women 39-31- 8- 9
No. In HH: One 44-32- 7- 5 Res: 10 to < 15 35-34- 6-10 Res: 15 to < 25 41-27- 8- 6 18-44 17-43-14- 9
No. In HH: Two 43-30- 9- 7 Men 44-33- 6- 3 Free and Clear 45-31- 8- 5 75-84 39-30- 6- 8
65-74 43-37- 7- 5 *MHP: < 5 Years 46-32- 4- 7 55-64 46-25- 8- 6 MHP: 10 <-15 35-32- 9- 8
$25K to $35K 43-19- 5- 3 MHP: 25+ Years 46-32- 4- 6 Aggregate 41-32- 8- 7 *MHP: < 5 Years 46-32- 4- 7
45-54 42-23- 3-19 Aggregate 41-32- 8- 7 No. In HH: One 44-32- 7- 5 MHP: 5 to < 10 40-36-10- 7
Res: 15 to < 25 41-27- 8- 6 MHP: 10 < 15 35-32- 9- 8 65-74 43-37- 7- 5 No. In HH: Two 43-30- 9- 7
Aggregate 41-32- 8- 7 Res: 25+ Years 45-32- 3- 6 Paying Mortgage 29-37- 7-11 Res: 5 to < 10 39-36-11- 7
MHP: 5 to < 10 40-36-10- 7 No. in HH: One 44-32- 7- 5 Res: 10 to < 15 35-34- 6-10 Aggregate 41-32- 8- 7
75-84 39-30- 6- 8 Women 39-31- 8- 9 75-84 39-30- 6- 8 MHP: 15 to < 25 36-29- 9- 7
Res: 5 to < 10 39-36-11- 7 * Res: < 5 Years 45-31- 3- 3 Men 44-33- 6- 3 Res: 15 to < 25 41-27- 8- 6
Women 39-31- 8- 9 Free and Clear 45-31- 8- 5 No. In HH: 3+ 20-41- 6-12 Res: 25+ Years 45-32- 3- 6
AHP: 15 to < 25 36-29- 9- 7 75-84 39-30- 6- 8 Kids in HH 12-47- 6-15 MHP: 25+ Years 46-32- 4- 6
$15K to $25K 36-49- 2- 4 No. In HH: Two 43-30- 9- 7 Res: Senior PK 49-30- 6- 4 55-64 46-25- 8- 6
Res: 10 to < 15 35-34- 6-10 Less Than $15K 35-30- 6-15 Less Than S15K 35-30- 6-15 No. In HH: One 44-32- 7- 5
Less Than $15K 35-30- 6-15 Res: Senior PK 49-30- 6- 4 S25K to S35K 43-19- 5- 3 Free and Clear 45-31- 8- 5
MHP: 10 < 15 35-32- 9- 8 85+ 49-29- 5- 2 85+ 49-29- 5- 2 65-74 43-37* 7- 5
S35K to S50K 31-38-10-10 MHP: 15 to < 25 36-29- 9- 7 *MHP: < 5 Years 46-32- 4- 7 Res: Senior PK 49-30- 6- 4
Paying Mortgage 29-37- 7-11 Res: 15 to < 25 41-27- 8- 6 MHP: 25+ Years 46-32- 4- 6 $15K to $25K 36-49-. 2- 4
Res: Family PK 25-36-11-13 S50K or More 45-25- 9-14 * Res: < 5 Years 45-31- 3- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 45-31- 3 3
No. In HH: 3+ 20-41- 6-12 55-64 46-25- 8- 6 45-54 42-23- 3-19 Men 44-33- 6- 3
18-44 17-43-14- 9 45-54 42-23- 3-19 Res: 25+ Years 45-32- 3- 6 $25K to S35K 43-19- 5- 3
Kids in HH 12-47- 6-15 $25K to $35K 43-19- 5- 3 $15K to S25K 36-49- 2- 4 85+ 49-29- 5- 2
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 7
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 8: Procedures For Making Rules For the Park
The procedures for making rules for the park
1. Very Acceptable 41 4. Very Unacceptable 7
2. Somewhat Acceptable 32 5. No Opinion 13
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 8
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
$15K to $25K 85- 6- 9 Res: Family PK 61-24-15 $25K to $35K 62- 8-30
65-74 80-12- 9 18-44 60-23-17 Kids in HH 59-21-21
Res: Senior PK 79-10-12 S50K or More 70-23- 7 No. In HH: 3+ 61-18-20
*MHP: < 5 Years 79-11-11 45-54 65-23-13 MHP: 15 to < 25 65-15-20
MHP: 25+ Years 79-10-12 Kids in HH 59-21-21 Res: 15 to < 25 68-14-18
85+ 78- 7-15 Less Than $15K 65-20-15 * Res: < 5 Years 76- 7-17
Res: 25+ Years 77- 9-14 $35K to S50K 69-19-12 18-44 60-23-17
Men 77-10-14 No. In HH: 3+ 61-18-20 MHP: 10 < 15 67-17-17
MHP: 5 to < 10 76-17- 7 Paying Mortgage 66-18-16 75-84 70-14-16
* Res: < 5 Years 76- 7-17 Res: 5 to < 10 74-18- 8 Paying Mortgage 66-18-16
Free and Clear 75-13-12 Women 70-17-13 55-64 71-13-15
No. In HH: One 75-12-13 MHP: 5 to < 10 76-17- 7 Res: Family PK 61-24-15
Res: 5 to < 10 74-18- 8 MHP: 10 < 15 67-17-17 Less Than $15K 65-20-15 '
No. In HH: Two 73-16-11 Res: 10 to < 15 69-16-15 85+ 78- 7-15
Aggregate 73-14-13 No. In HH: Two 73-16-11 Res: 10 to < 15 69-16-15
55-64 71-13-15 MHP: 15 to < 25 65-15-20 Res: 25+ Years 77- 9-14
S50K or More 70-23- 7 75-84 70-14-16 Men 77-10-14
Women 70-17-13 Aggregate 73-14-13 Aggregate 73-14-13
75-84 70-14-16 Res: 15 to < 25 68-14-18 Women 70-17-13
Res: 10 to < 15 69-16-15 55-64 71-13-15 No. In HH: One 75-12-13
S35K to $50K 69-19-12 Free and Clear 75-13-12 45-54 65-23-13
Res: 15 to < 25 68-14-18 No. In HH: One 75-12-13 $35K to S50K 69-19-12
MHP: 10 < 15 67-17-17 65-74 80-12- 9 MHP: 25+ Years 79-10-12
Paying Mortgage 66-18-16 *MHP: < 5 Years 79-11-11 Free and Clear 75-13-12
Less Than $15K 65-20-15 Res: Senior PK 79-10-12 Res: Senior PK 79-10-12
MHP: 15 to < 25 65-15-20 Men 77-10-14 No. 1n HH: Two 73-16-11 a
45-54 65-23-13 MHP: 25+ Years 79-10-12 *MHP: < 5 Years 79-11-11
$25K to $35K 62- 8-30 Res: 25+ Years 77- 9-14 S15K to $25K 85- 6- 9
Res: Family PK 61-24-15 S25K to $35K 62- 8-30 65-74 80-12- 9
No. In HH: 3+ 61-18-20 85+ 78- 7-15 Res: 5 to < 10 74-18- 8
18-44 60-23-17 * Res: < 5 Years 76- 7-17 MHP: 5 to < 10 76-17- 7
Kids in HH 59-21-21 $15K to $25K 85- 6- 9 S50K or More 70-23- 7
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 8
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 9: Resolution of Problems
The resolution of problems
1. Very Acceptable 42 4. Very Unacceptable 6
2. Somewhat Acceptable 32 5. No Opinion 11
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 10
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
85+ 61-20- 5- 0 Kids in HH 24-47-18- 6 18-44 23-46-20- 6 45-54 42-32-13-13
*MHP: < 5 Years 54-25-11- 7 18-44 23-46-20- 6 E50K or More 41-27-18- 7 Less Than E15K 30-35- 6-11
* Res: < 5 Years 52-34-10- 3 No. In HH: 3+ 29-45-16- 6 Res: Family PK 28-34-18-10 Res: Family PK 28-34-18-10
MHP: 25+ Years 51-25- 6- 4 Paying Mortgage 38-42- 8- 8 Kids in NH 24-47-18- 6 Res: 10 to < 15 37-27-11-10
Res: 25+ Years 50-21- 6- 5 Res: 5 to < 10 35-39-14- 8 No. In HH: 3+ 29-45-16- 6 55-64 38-38-10-10
Res: Senior PK 49-30- 5- 4 55-64 38-38-10-10 MHP: 5 to < 10 37-38-14- 8 E35K to E50K 36-38-12-10
Men 44-35-10- 3 65-74 38-38- 7- 7 Res: 5 to < 10 35-39-14- 8 MHP: 10 < 15 35-30-14- 9
No. In HH: One 44-27- 7- 6 $35K to E50K 36-38-12-10 MHP: 10 < 15 35-30-14- 9 Paying Mortgage 38-42- 8- 8
Res: 15 to < 25 43-33- 5- 4 $15K to E25K 40-38- 9- 4 45-54 42-32-13-13 Women 40-30- 9- 8
No. In HH: Two 43-33-10- 6 MHP: 5 to < 10 37-38-14- 8 E35K to $50K 36-38-12-10 MHP: 5 to < 10 37-38-14- 8
S25K to $35K 43-30-11- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 38-35- 5- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 37-27-11-10 Res: 5 to < 10 35-39-14- 8
45-54 42-32-13-13 Less Than S15K 30-35- 6-11 $25K to S35K 43-30-11- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 54-25-11- 7
Free and Clear 42-29-10- 5 Men 44-35-10- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 54-25-11- 7 S50K or More 41-27-18- 7
Aggregate 42-32-10- 6 * Res: < 5 Years 52-34-10- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 52-34-10- 3 65-74 38-38- 7- 7
75-84 41-26-10- 4 Res: Family PK 28-34-18-10 Men 44-35-10- 3 No. In HH: Two 43-33-10- 6
E50K or More 41-27-18- 7 No. In HH: Two 43-33-10- 6 Free and Clear 42-29-10- 5 No. in HH: 3+ 29-45-16- 6
Women 40-30- 9- 8 Res: 15 to < 25 43-33- 5- 4 No. In HH: Two 43-33-10- 6 Aggregate 42-32-10- 6
S15K to E25K 40-38- 9- 4 45-54 42-32-13-13 75-84 41-26-10- 4 Kids in HH 24-47718- 6
55-64 38-38-10-10 Aggregate 42-32-10- 6 55-64 38-38-10-10 18-44 23-46-20- 6
65-74 38-38- 7- 7 Women 40-30- 9- 8 Aggregate 42-32-10- 6 No. In HH: One 44-27- 7- 6
MHP: 15 to < 25 38-35- 5- 4 MHP: 10 < 15 35-30-14- 9 E15K to E25K 40-38- 9- 4 Free and Clear 42-29-10- 5
laying Mortgage 38-42- 8- 8 Res: Senior PK 49-30- 5- 4 Women 40-30- 9- 8 Res: 25+ Years 50-21- 6- 5
Res: 10 to < 15 37-27-11-10 E25K to E35K 43-30-11- 3 Paying Mortgage 38-42- 8- 8 75-84 41-26-10- 4
MHP: 5 to < 10 37-38-14- 8 Free and Clear 42-29-10- 5 No. In HH: One 44-27- 7- 6 Res: Senior PK 49-30- 5- 4
E35K to E50K 36-38-12-10 Res: 10 to < 15 37-27-11-10 65-74 38-38- 7- 7 MHP: 15 to < 25 38-35- 5- 4
Res: 5 to < 10 35-39-14- 8 $50K or More 41-27-18- 7 Res: 25+ Years 50-21- 6- 5 $15K to E25K 40-38r 9- 4
MHP: 10 < 15 35-30-14- 9 No. In HH: One 44-27- 7- 6 MHP: 25+ Years 51-25- 6- 4 MHP: 25+ Years 51-25- 6- 4
Less Than S15K 30-35- 6-11 75-84 41-26-10- 4 Less Than S15K 30-35- 6-11 Res: 15 to < 25 43-33- 5- 4
No. In HH: 3+ 29-45-16- 6 *MHP: < 5 Years 54-25-11- 7 Res: Senior PK 49-30- 5- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 52-34-10- 3
Res: Family PK 28-34-18-10 MHP: 25+ Years 51-25- 6- 4 Res: 15 to < 25 43-33- 5- 4 Men 44-35-10- 3
Kids in HH 24-47-18- 6 Res: 25+ Years 50-21- 6- 5 85+ 61-20- 5- 0 E25K to E35K 43-30-11- 3
18-44 23-46-20- 6 85+ 61-20- 5- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 38-35- 5- 4 85+ 61-20- 5- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 9
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 9: Resolution of Problems
The resolution of problems
1. Very Acceptable 42 4. Very Unacceptable 6
2. Somewhat Acceptable 32 5. No Opinion 11
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 10
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
* Res: < 5 Years 86-14- 0 Res: Family PK 62-28-10 75-84 67-14-19
85+ 80- 5-15 45-54 74-26- 0 Less Than $15K 65-17-19
Paying Mortgage 79-16- 5 18-44 69-26- 6 Res: 25+ Years 71-11-18
Res: Senior PK 79- 9-12 S50K or More 68-25- 7 MHP: 15 to < 25 73- 9-18
Men 79-13- 8 Kids in HH 71-24- 6 No. In HH: One 71-13-16
*MHP: < 5 Years 79-18- 4 MHP: 10 < 15 65-23-12 Res: 15 to < 25 76- 9-15
S15K to S25K 77-13- 9 No. In HH: 3+ 73-22- 4 85+ 80- 5-15
65-74 77-13-10 MHP: 5 to < 10 75-22- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 65-21-15
55-64 77-19- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 74-22- 5 MHP: 25+ Years 76-10-14
MHP: 25+ Years 76-10-14 $35K to S50K 74-21- 5 Free and Clear 71-15-14
Res: 15 to < 25 76- 9-15 Res: 10 to < 15 65-21-15 $25K to S35K 73-14-14
No. In HH: Two 76-16- 8 55-64 77-19- 4 Women 70-17-13
MHP: 5 to < 10 75-22- 4 *MHP: < 5 Years 79-18- 4 MHP: 10 < 15 65-23-12
45-54 74-26- 0 Women 70-17-13 Res: Senior PK 79- 9-12
S35K to S50K 74-21- 5 Less Than $15K 65-17-19 Aggregate 74-16-11
Res: 5 to < 10 74-22- 5 No. In HH: Two 76-16- 8 Res: Family PK 62-28-10
Aggregate 74-16-11 Paying Mortgage 79-16- 5 65-74 77-13-10
No. In HH: 3+ 73-22- 4 Aggregate 74-16-11 S15K to S25K 77-13- 9
MHP: 15 to < 25 73- 9-18 Free and Clear 71-15-14 Men 79-13- 8
S25K to $35K 73-14-14 75-84 67-14-19 No. In HH: Two 76-16- 8
Res: 25+ Years 71-11-18 * Res: < 5 Years 86-14- 0 $50K or More 68-25- 7
No. In HH: One 71-13-16 S25K to $35K 73-14-14 Kids in HH 71-24- 6
Free and Clear 71-15-14 65-74 77-13-10 18-44 69-26- 6
Kids in HH 71-24- 6 $15K to $25K 77-13- 9 S35K to S50K 74-21- 5
Women 70-17-13 No. In HH: One 71-13-16 Paying Mortgage 79-16- 5
18-44 69-26- 6 Men 79-13- 8 Res: 5 to < 10 74-22- 5 a
S50K or More 68-25- 7 Res: 25+ Years 71-11-18 No. In HH: 3+ 73-22- 4
75-84 67-14-19 MHP: 25+ Years 76-10-14 55-64 77-19- 4
MHP: 10 < 15 65-23-12 Res: Senior PK 79- 9-12 *MHP: < 5 Years 79-18- 4
Less Than S15K 65-17-19 Res: 15 to < 25 76- 9-15 MHP: 5 to < 10 75-22- 4
Res: 10 to < 15 65-21-15 MHP: 15 to < 25 73- 9-18 45-54 74-26- 0
Res: Family PK 62-28-10 85+ 80- 5-15 * Res: < 5 Years 86-14- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 10
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 10: Enforcement of Rules and Regulations
The enforcement of rules and regulations
1. Very Acceptable 43 4. Very Unacceptable 8
2. Somewhat Acceptable 36 5. No Opinion 2
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 12
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
85+ 56-32- 2- 5 18-44 14-54-17-14 Kids in HH 12-50-21-18 45-54 32-42- 3-23
55-64 56-19-15- 8 Kids in HH 12-50-21-18 $15K to $25K 38-38-19- 4 No. In HH: 3+ 16-49-16-18
Res: Senior PK 54-29- 9- 5 No. In HH: 3+ 16-49-16-18 18-44 14-54-17-14 *MHP: < 5 Years 46-29- 7-18
Res: 10 to < 15 52-32- 8- 8 Res: Family PK 21-47-17-13 Res: Family PK 21-47-17-13 Kids in HH 12-50-21-18
Res: 25+ Years 52-27- 8- 6 65-74 37-45-12- 7 No. In HH: 3+ 16-49-16-18 * Res: < 5 Years 45-28-10-17
MHP: 10 < 15 50-30-14- 6 S50K or More 32-43-14-11 Res: 5 to < 10 31-42-16-10 $35K to S50K 29-43-12-17
Less Than S15K 50-31- 9- 6 S35K to S50K 29-43-12-17 55-64 56-19-15- 8 18-44 14-54-17-14
MHP: 25+ Years 49-31- 7- 5 45-54 32-42- 3-23 75-84 48-28-14- 4 Paying Mortgage 32-41-13-14
75-84 48-28-14- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 31-42-16-10 MHP: 5 to < 10 32-41-14-11 Res: Family PK 21-47-17-13
No. In HH: One 47-37-11- 3 MHP: 5 to < 10 32-41-14-11 MHP: 10 < 15 50-30-14- 6 MHP: 5 to < 10 32-41-14-11
*MHP: < 5 Years 46-29- 7-18 Paying Mortgage 32-41-13-14 $50K or More 32-43-14-11 S50K or More 32-43-14-11
No. In HH: Two 46-30-12-10 S25K to S35K 43-41- 8- 8 Men 43-36-14- 7 Res: 5 to < 10 31-42-16-10
Free and Clear 45-34-11- 6 MHP: 15 to < 25 44-38-13- 5 MHP: 15 to < 25 44-38-13- 5 No. In HH': Two 46-30-12-10
Res: 15 to < 25 45-37-12- 4 S15K to $25K 38-38-19- 4 Paying Mortgage 32-41-13-14 $25K to S35K 43-41- 8- 8
* Res: < 5 Years 45-28-10-17 Res: 15 to < 25 45-37-12- 4 Res: 15 to < 25 45-37-12- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 52-32- 8- 8
MHP: 15 to < 25 44-38-13- 5 No. In HH: One 47-37-11- 3 S35K to S50K 29-43-12-17 Women 43-35-11- 8
S25K to $35K 43-41- 8- 8 Men 43-36-14- 7 Aggregate 43-36-12- 8 Aggregate 43-36-12- 8
Men 43-36-14- 7 Aggregate 43-36-12- 8 No. In HH: Two 46-30-12-10 55-64 56-19-15- 8
Aggregate 43-36-12- 8 Women 43-35-11- 8 65-74 37-45-12- 7 Men 43-36-14- 7
Women 43-35-11- 8 Free and Clear 45-34-11- 6 Free and Clear 45-34-11- 6 65-74 37-45-12- 7
S15K to S25K 38-38-19- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 52-32- 8- 8 No. In HH: One 47-37-11- 3 MHP:AO < 15 50-30-14- 6
65-74 37-45-12- 7 85+ 56-32- 2- 5 Women 43-35-11- 8 Res: 25+ Years 52-27- 8- 6
45-54 32-42- 3-23 Less Than S15K 50-31- 9- 6 * Res: < 5 Years 45-28-10-17 Free and Clear 45-34-11- 6
Paying Mortgage 32-41-13-14 MHP: 25+ Years 49-31- 7- 5 Less Than S15K 50-31- 9- 6 Less Than $15K 50-31- 9- 6
S50K or More 32-43-14-11 No. In HH: Two 46-30-12-10 Res: Senior PK 54-29- 9- 5 Res: Senior PK 54-29- 9- 5
MHP: 5 to < 10 32-41-14-11 MHP: 10 < 15 50-30-14- 6 $25K to S35K 43-41- 8- 8 85+ 56-32y 2- 5
Res: 5 to < 10 31-42-16-10 Res: Senior PK 54-29- 9- 5 Res: 10 to < 15 52-32- 8- 8 MHP: 15 to < 25 44-38-13- 5
S35K to S50K 29-43-12-17 *MHP: < 5 Years 46-29- 7-18 Res: 25+ Years 52-27- 8- 6 MHP: 25+ Years 49-31- 7- 5
Res: family PK 21-47-17-13 75-84 48-28-14- 4 *MHP: < 5 Years 46-29- 7-18 75-84 48-28-14- 4
No. In HH: 3+ 16-49-16-18 * Res: < 5 Years 45-28-10-17 MHP: 25+ Years 49-31- 7- 5 S15K to $25K 38-38-19- 4
18-44 14-54-17-14 Res: 25+ Years 52-27- 8- 6 45-54 32-42- 3-23 Res: 15 to < 25 45-37-12- 4
Kids in HH 12-50-21-18 55-64 56-19-15- 8 85+ 56-32- 2- 5 No. In HH: One 47-37-11- 3
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 11
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 10: Enforcement of Rules and Regulations
The enforcement of rules and regulations
1. Very Acceptable 43 4. Very Unacceptable 8
2. Somewhat Acceptable 36 5. No Opinion 2
3. Somewhat Unacceptable 12
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
85+ 88- 7- 5 Kids in HH 62-38- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 80-12- 8
Res: 10 to < 15 84-16- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 65-35- 0 Res: 25+ Years 79-14- 8
$25K to $35K 84-16- 0 18-44 69-31- 0 75-84 76-19- 5
No. In HH: One 84-14- 3 Res: Family PK 69-30- 1 85+ 88- 7- 5
Res: Senior PK 83-14- 3 S35K to $50K 71-29- 0 Less Than $15K 81-15- 4
Res: 15 to < 25 82-16- 2 * Res: < 5 Years 72-28- 0 Women 78-19- 4
MHP: 15 to < 25 82-18- 0 Paying Mortgage 73-27- 0 Free and Clear 80-17- 3
65-74 82-18- 0 45-54 74-26- 0 Res: Senior PK 83-14- 3
Less Than $15K 81-15- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 73-26- 2 No. In HH: One 84-14- 3
MHP: 10 < 15 80-20- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 73-25- 2 No. In HH: Two 76-22- 2
MHP: 25+ Years 80-12- 8 *MHP: < 5 Years 75-25- 0 Aggregate 78-20- 2
Free and Clear 80-17- 3 S50K or More 75-25- 0 55-64 75-23- 2
Men 79-21- 0 55-64 75-23- 2 $15K to S25K 75-23- 2
Res: 25+ Years 79-14- 8 $15K to $25K 75-23- 2 Res: 15 to < 25 82-16- 2
Aggregate 78-20- 2 No. In HH: Two 76-22- 2 MHP: 5 to < 10 73-25- 2
Women 78-19- 4 Men 79-21- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 73-26- 2
No. In HH: Two 76-22- 2 MHP: 10 < 15 80-20- 0 Res: Family PK 69-30- 1
75-84 76-19- 5 Aggregate 78-20- 2 MHP: 10 < 15 80-20- 0
$15K to $25K 75-23- 2 75-84 76-19- 5 Kids in HH 62-38- 0
55-64 75-23- 2 Women 78-19- 4 MHP: 15 to < 25 82-18- 0
$50K or More 75-25- 0 65-74 82-18- 0 Paying Mortgage 73-27- 0
*MHP: < 5 Years 75-25- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 82-18- 0 18-44 69-31- 0
45-54 74-26- 0 Free and Clear 80-17- 3 45-54 74-26- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 73-26- 2 $25K to $35K 84-16- 0 Men 79-21- 0
MHP: 5 to < 10 73-25- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 84-16- 0 65-74 82-18- 0
Paying Mortgage 73-27- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 82-16- 2 Res: 10 to <.15 84-16- 0
* Res: < 5 Years 72-28- 0 Less Than $15K 81-15- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 72-28- 0
S35K to S50K 71-29- 0 Res: 25+ Years 79-14- 8 No. In HH: 3+ 65-35- 0
Res: Family PK 69-30- 1 Res: Senior PK 83-14- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 75-25- 0
18-44 69-31- 0 No. In HH: One 84-14- 3 S25K to $35K 84-16- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 65-35- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 80-12- 8 S35K to S50K 71-29- 0
Kids in HH 62-38- 0 85+ 88- 7- 5 S50K or More 75-25- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 12
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 13: How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Park
In terms of your own feelings of safety, do you feel your mobile home park
is . . . very safe, somewhat safe, somewhat unsafe or very unsafe?
1. Very Safe 70 4. Very Unsafe 1
2. Somewhat Safe 26 5. No Opinion 0
3. Somewhat Unsafe 3
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
* Res: < 5 Years 76-21- 3- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 64-33- 2- 2 Res: Family PK 59-30- 8- 3 Less Than S15K 63-31- 2- 4
Res: 25+ Years 76-21- 3- 0 Kids in HH 59-32- 6- 3 45-54 61-32- 6- 0 Res: Family PK 59-30- 8- 3
85+ 76-22- 2- 0 45-54 61-32- 6- 0 Kids in HH 59-32- 6- 3 Kids in HH 59-32- 6- 3
Res: Senior PK 75-24- 0- 0 Less Than S15K 63-31- 2- 4 18-44 63-29- 6- 3 18-44 63-29- 6- 3
S35K to S50K 74-19- 5- 2 55-64 67-31- 0- 2 S25K to $35K 70-22- 5- 0 $35K to $50K 74-19- 5- 2
No. In HH: One 73-24- 1- 2 MHP: 5 to < 10 66-31- 2- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 68-26- 5- 2 Res: 5 to < 10 64-33- 2- 2
MHP: 25+ Years 73-21- 4- 1 No. In HH: 3+ 63-31- 4- 2 S35K to $50K 74-19- 5- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 63-31- 4- 2
75-84 72-23- 4- 1 Res: Family PK 59-30- 8- 3 No. In HH: Two 67-27- 5- 1 65-74 66-28- 3- 2
Res: 15 to < 25 72-23- 4- 1 Paying Mortgage 66-29- 3- 2 MHP: 10 < 15 67-27- 5- 2 55-64 67-31- 0- 2
MHP: 15 to < 25 71-24- 4- 1 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-29- 0- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 63-31- 4- 2 S15K to $25K 70-26- 2- 2
*MHP: < 5 Years 71-29- 0- 0 18-44 63-29- 6- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 71-24- 4- 1 Paying Mortgage 66-29- 3- 2
$50K or More 70-27- 2- 0 65-74 66-28- 3- 2 75-84 72-23- 4- 1 MHP: 5 to < 10 66-31- 2- 2
$25K to $35K 70-22- 5- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 67-27- 5- 2 MHP: 25+ Years 73-21- 4- 1 No. In HH: One 73-24- 1- 2
Men 70-25- 3- 1 $50K or More 70-27- 2- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 72-23- 4- 1 Res: 10 to < 15 68-26- 5- 2
Free and Clear 70-26- 3- 1 No. In HH: Two 67-27- 5- 1 * Res: < 5 Years 76-21- 3- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 67-27- 5- 2
S15K to S25K 70-26- 2- 2 Women 69-26- 3- 1 Free and Clear 70-26- 3- 1 Men 70-25- 3- 1
Aggregate 70-26- 3- 1 $15K to $25K 70-26- 2- 2 Women 69-26- 3- 1 Aggregate 70-26- 3- 1
Women 69-26- 3- 1 Aggregate 70-26- 3- 1 Res: 25+ Years 76-21- 3- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 73-21- 4- 1
Res: 10 to < 15 68-26- 5- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 68-26- 5- 2 Aggregate 70-26- 3- 1 Women-= 69-26- 3- 1.
55-64 67-31- 0- 2 Free and Clear 70-26- 3- 1 65-74 66-28- 3- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 71-24- 4- 1
No. In HH: Two 67-27- 5- 1 Men 70-25- 3- 1 Paying Mortgage 66-29- 3- 2 75-84 72-23- 4- 1
MHP: 10 < 15 67-27- 5- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 71-24- 4- 1 Men 70-25- 3- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 72-23- 4- 1
65-74 66-28- 3- 2 Res: Senior PK 75-24- 0- 0 85+ 76-22- 2- 0 Free and Clear 70-26- 3- 1
Paying Mortgage 66-29- 3- 2 No. In HH: One 73-24- 1- 2 S50K or More 70-27- 2- 0 No. In HH: Two 67-27- 5- 1
MHP: 5 to < 10 66-31- 2- 2 75-84 72-23- 4- 1 $15K to $25K 70-26- 2- 2 Res: Senior PK 75-24K 0- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 64-33- 2- 2 Res: 15 to < 25 72-23- 4- 1 Less Than $15K 63-31- 2- 4 45-54 61-32- 6- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 63-31- 4- 2 85+ 76-22- 2- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 66-31- 2- 2 85+ 76-22- 2- 0
Less Than $15K 63-31- 2- 4 S25K to S35K 70-22- 5- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 64-33- 2- 2 Res: 25+ Years 76-21- 3= 0
18-44 63-29- 6- 3 MHP: 25+ Years 73-21- 4- 1 No. In HH: One 73-24- 1- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-29- 0- 0
45-54 61-32- 6- 0 Res: 25+ Years 76-21- 3- 0 Res: Senior PK 75-24- 0- 0 $25K to $35K 70-22- 5- 0
Kids in HH 59-32- 6- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 76-21- 3- 0 55-64 67-31- 0- 2 * Res: < 5 Years 76-21- 3- 0
Res: Family PK 59-30- 8- 3 $35K to S50K 74-19- 5- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-29- 0- 0 $50K or More 70-27- 2- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 13
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 13: How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Park
In terms of your own feelings of safety, do you feel your mobile home park
is ... very safe, somewhat safe, somewhat unsafe or very unsafe?
1. Very Safe 70 4. Very Unsafe 1
2. Somewhat Safe 26 5. No Opinion 0
3. Somewhat Unsafe 3
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
*MHP: < 5 Years **- 0- 0 Res: Family PK 89-11- 0 S25K to $35K 92- 5- 3
Res: Senior PK 99- 0- 0 Kids in HH 91- 9- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 94- 5- 1
55-64 98- 2- 0 18-44 91- 9- 0 65-74 94- 5- 1
S50K or More 98- 2- 0 S35K to $50K 93- 7- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 95- 4- 1
85+ 98- 2- 0 45-54 94- 6- 0 Men 95- 4- 1
No. In HH: One 97- 3- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 94- 6- 0 No. In HH: Two 94- 5- 1
Res: 25+ Years 97- 3- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 94- 6- 0 Res: Senior PK 99- 0- 0
* Res: < 5 Years 97- 3- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 94- 6- 0 Free and Clear 96- 4- 0
MHP: 5 to < 10 96- 4- 0 Less Than $15K 94- 6- 0 Aggregate 96- 4- 0
$15K to $25K 96- 4- 0 S25K to S35K 92- 5- 3 Kids in HH 91- 9- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 96- 4- 0 No. In HH: Two 94- 5- 1 Res: 10 to < 15 94- 6- 0
Free and Clear 96- 4- 0 65-74 94- 5- 1 * Res: < 5 Years 97- 3- 0
Women 96- 4- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 95- 5- 0 Res: 25+ Years 97- 3- 0
75-84 96- 4- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 94- 5- 1 *MHP: < 5 Years **- 0- 0
Aggregate 96- 4- 0 Paying Mortgage 95- 5- 0 Women 96- 4- 0
Paying Mortgage 95- 5- 0 75-84 96- 4- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 94- 6- 0
Men 95- 4- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 95- 4- 1 MHP: 15 to < 25 95- 5- 0
MHP: 15 to < 25 95- 5- 0 Women 96- 4- 0 Paying Mortgage 95- 5- 0
Res: 15 to < 25 95- 4- 1 Aggregate 96- 4- 0 No. In HH: One 97- 3- 0
Less Than $15K 94- 6- 0 Men 95- 4- 1 Res: Family PK 89-11- 0
65-74 94- 5- 1 Free and Clear 96- 4- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 94- 6- 0
No. In HH: Two 94- 5- 1 Res: 5 to < 10 96- 4- 0 18-44 91- 9- 0
MHP: 25+ Years 94- 5- 1 $15K to S25K 96- 4- 0 45-54 94- 6- 0
MHP: 10 < 15 94- 6- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 96- 4- 0 55-64 98- 2- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 94- 6- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 97- 3- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 96- 4- 0
45-54 94- 6- 0 Res: 25+ Years 97- 3- 0 75-84 96- 4- 0
Res: 10 to < 15 94- 6- 0 No. In HH: One 97- 3- 0 85+ 98- 2- 0
S35K to $50K 93- 7- 0 85+ 98- 2- 0 Less Than S15K 94- 6- 0
S25K to $35K 92- 5- 3 S50K or More 98- 2- 0 $15K to S25K 96- 4- 0
18-44 91- 9- 0 55-64 98- 2- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 96- 4- 0
Kids in HH 91- 9- 0 Res: Senior PK 99- 0- 0 $35K to $50K 93- 7- 0
Res: Family PK 89-11- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years **- 0- 0 $50K or More 98- 2- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 14
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 14: How Fair Is Your Rent
In general, is your rent ... very fair, somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or
very unfair?
1. Very Fair 38 4. Very Unfair 12
2. Somewhat Fair 36 5. No Opinion 1
3. Somewhat Unfair 14
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
Res: 25+ Years 56-32- 2-11 * Res: < 5 Years 24-55-10-10 18-44 17-26-29-26 18-44 17-26-29-26
MHP: 25+ Years 49-39- 2-10 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-46-14-14 Res: 10 to < 15 31-34-24- 8 Res: Family PK 36-21-16-25
85+ 49-37- 5-10 $25K to $35K 35-46-11- 8 MHP: 10 < 15 30-33-23-11 Kids in HH 21-32-21-24
S15K to S25K 42-42- 6-11 Res: Senior PK 39-44-12- 4 $35K to S50K 29-36-21-14 Res: 5 to < 10 33-32-16-19
75-84 41-32-13-13 55-64 33-42-13-12 Kids in HH 21-32-21-24 Less Than $15K 30-37-15-19
MHP: 15 to < 25 41-37-14- 7 $15K to S25K 42-42- 6-11 No. In HH: 3+ 27-39-18-14 S50K or More 27-34-18-18
No. In HH: One 41-34-15- 9 Men 37-41-10-12 $50K or More 27-34-18-18 MHP: 5 to < 10 33-32-17-18
65-74 40-40-13- 7 Res: 15 to < 25 39-41-13- 6 MHP: 5 to < 10 33-32-17-18 45-54 39-32-13-16
Free and Clear 40-35-14-10 65-74 40-40-13- 7 Res: Family PK 36-21-16-25 Paying Mortgage 28-40-16-15
Res: 15 to < 25 39-41-13- 6 Paying Mortgage 28-40-16-15 Res: 5 to < 10 33-32-16-19 $35K to $50K 29-36-21-14
Res: Senior PK 39-44-12- 4 MHP: 25+ Years 49-39- 2-10 Paying Mortgage 28-40-16-15 *MHP: < 5-Years 25-46-14-14
45-54 39-32-13-16 No. In HH: 3+ 27-39-18-14 Women 38-34-16-11 No. In HH: 3+ 27-39-18-14
No. In HH: Two 38-37-11-13 No. In HH: Two 38-37-11-13 Less Than S15K 30-37-15-19 No. In HH: Two 38-37-11-13
Women 38-34-16-11 MHP: 15 to < 25 41-37-14- 7 No. In HH: One 41-34-15- 9 75-84 41-32-13-13
Aggregate 38-36-14-12 Less Than S15K 30-37-15-19 MHP: 15 to < 25 41-37-14- 7 Men 37-41-10-12
Men 37-41-10-12 85+ 49-37- 5-10 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-46-14-14 55-64 33-42-13-12
Res: Family PK 36-21-16-25 Aggregate 38-36-14-12 Aggregate 38-36-14-12 Aggregate 38-36-14-12
S25K to $35K 35-46-11- 8 $35K to $50K 29-36-21-14 Free and Clear 40-35-14-10 Women 38-34-16-11
MHP: 5 to < 10 33-32-17-18 Free and Clear 40-35-14-10 55-64 33-42-13-12 $15K to S25K 42-42- 6-11.
es: 5 to -< 10 33-32-16-19 No. In HH: One 41-34-15- 9 75-84 41-32-13-13 Res: 25+ Years 56-32- 2-11
,5-64 33-42-13-12 $50K or More 27-34-18-18 Res: 15 to < 25 39-41-13- 6 MHP: 10 < 15 30-33-23-11
Res: 10 to < 15 31-34-24- 8 Res: 10 to < 15 31-34-24- 8 45-54 39-32-13-16 Free and Clear 40-35-14-10
MHP: 10 < 15 30-33-23-11 Women 38-34-16-11 65-74 40-40-13- 7 * Res: < 5 Years 24-55-10-10
Less Than $15K 30-37-15-19 MHP: 10 < 15 30-33-23-11 Res: Senior PK 39-44-12- 4 85+ 49-37- 5-10
$35K to $50K 29-36-21-14 MHP: 5 to < 10 33-32-17-18 No. In HH: Two 38-37-11-13 MHP: 25+ Years_ 49-394 2-10
Paying Mortgage 28-40-16-15 Kids in HH 21-32-21-24 $25K to $35K 35-46-11- 8 No. In HH: One 41-34-15- 9
S50K or More 27-34-18-18 45-54 39-32-13-16 * Res: < 5 Years 24-55-10-10 $25K to $35K 35-46-11- 8
No. In HH: 3+ 27-39-18-14 75-84 41-32-13-13 Men 37-41-10-12 Res: 10 to < 15 31-34-24= 8
*MHP: < 5 Years 25-46-14-14 Res: 25+ Years 56-32- 2-11 $15K to $25K 42-42- 6-11 65-74 40-40-13- 7
* Res: < 5 Years 24-55-10-10 Res: 5 to < 10 33-32-16-19 85+ 49-37- 5-10 MHP: 15 to < 25 41-37-14- 7
Kids in HH 21-32-21-24 18-44 17-26-29-26 MHP: 25+ Years 49-39- 2-10 Res: 15 to < 25 39-41-13- 6
18-44 17-26-29-26 Res: Family PK 36-21-16-25 Res: 25+ Years 56-32- 2-11 Res: Senior PK 39-44-12- 4
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 15
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 14: How Fair Is Your Rent
In general, is your rent ... very fair, somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or
very unfair?
1. Very Fair 38 4. Very Unfair 12
2. Somewhat Fair 36 5. No Opinion 1
3. Somewhat Unfair 14
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
MHP: 25+ Years 88-12- 0 18-" 43-54- 3 Res: 10 to < 15 65-32- 3
Res: 25+ Years 88-12- 0 Kids in HH 53-44- 3 MHP: 10 < 15 64-33- 3
85+ 85-15- 0 Res: Family PK 57-41- 1 Kids in HH 53-44- 3
S15K to $25K 83-17- 0 S50K or More 61-36- 2 18-44 43-54- 3
Res: Senior PK 83-17- 0 $35K to S50K 64-36- 0 S50K or More 61-36- 2
S25K to $35K 81-19- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 65-35- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 65-33- 2
65-74 81-19- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 66-34- 0 Res: Family PK 57-41- 1
Res: 15 to < 25 80-19- 1 Less Than $15K 67-33- 0 Women 72-27- 1
* Res: < 5 Years 79-21- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 64-33- 3 No. In HH: One 75-24- 1
Men 78-22- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 65-33- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 78-21- 1
MHP: 15 to < 25 78-21- 1 Res: 10 to < 15 65-32- 3 Paying Mortgage 68-31- 1
No. In HH: Two 75-25- 0 Paying Mortgage 68-31- 1 75-84 73-26- 1
Free and Clear 75-24- 1 45-54 71-29- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 80-19- 1
No. In HH: One 75-24- 1 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-29- 0 Aggregate 74-25- 1
55-64 75-25- 0 Women 72-27- 1 Free and Clear 75-24- 1
Aggregate 74-25- 1 75-84 73-26- 1 Res: Senior PK 83-17- 0
75-84 73-26- 1 Aggregate 74-25- 1 Res: 25+ Years 88-12- 0
Women 72-27- 1 55-64 75-25- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 66-34- 0
*MHP: < 5 Years 71-29- 0 No. In HH: Two 75-25- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 79-21- 0
45-54 71-29- 0 Free and Clear 75-24- 1 Res: 5 to < 10 65-35- 0
Paying Mortgage 68-31- 1 No. In HH: One 75-24- 1 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-29- 0
Less Than S15K 67-33- 0 Men 78-22- 0 Men 78-22- 0
MHP: 5 to < 10 66-34- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 78-21- 1 No. In HH: Two 75-25- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 65-33- 2 * Res: < 5 Years 79-21- 0 55-64 75-25- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 65-35- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 80-19- 1 MHP: 25+ Years 88-12- 0 a
Res: 10 to < 15 65-32- 3 65-74 81-19- 0 45-54 71-29- 0
$35K to S50K 64-36- 0 $25K to S35K 81-19- 0 85+ 85-15- 0
MHP: 10 < 15 64-33- 3 $15K to S25K 83-17- 0 Less Than $15K 67-33- 0
$50K or More 61-36- 2 Res: Senior PK 83-17- 0 $15K to S25K 83-17- 0
Res: Family PK 57-41- 1 85+ 85-15- 0 $25K to $35K 81-19- 0
Kids in HH 53-44- 3 Res: 25+ Years 88-12- 0 $35K to $50K 64-36- 0
18-44 43-54- 3 MHP: 25+ Years 88-12- 0 65-74 81-19- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 16
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 15: Compared to Amenities in Park How Fair Is Rent
In comparison to the amenities provided by your park, is your rent .. . very
fair, somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
1. Very Fair 37 4. Very Unfair 10
2. Somewhat Fair 37 5. No Opinion 4
3. Somewhat Unfair 12
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
Res: 25+ Years 50-30- 3- 9 S50K or More 20-55-14-11 $35K to S50K 29-36-29- 5 Res: Family PK 29-30-16-21
MHP: 25+ Years 44-36- 2-11 45-54 35-48- 6-10 18-44 11-43-26-17 Kids in HH 18-41-21-18
85+ 44-39- 0- 7 * Res: < 5 Years 31-48-14- 3 Kids in HH 18-41-21-18 18-44 11-43-26-17
65-74 42-33-16- 6 55-64 33-44-13- 8 Res: 10 to < 15 32-40-19- 6 Res: 5 to < 10 34-32-16-15
Res: Senior PK 41-41-10- 4 Paying Mortgage 30-43-14-11 MHP: 5 to < 10 33-32-18-13 MHP: 5 to < 10 33-32-18-13
$25K to $35K 41-43- 8- 8 $25K to $35K 41-43- 8- 8 No. In NH: 3+ 24-43-18-12 Less Than $15K 35-37-11-13
No. In HH: Two 40-37-12- 9 18-44 11-43-26-17 MHP: 10 < 15 32-41-17- 9 75-84 39-32-11-13
Men 39-37-12-10 *MHP: < 5 Years 32-43-14- 7 65-74 42-33-16- 6 No. In HH: 3+ 24-43-18-12
Free and Clear 39-34-12- 9 No. In HH: 3+ 24-43-18-12 Res: Family PK 29-30-16-21 S50K or More 20-55-14-11
75-84 39-32-11-13 Res: 15 to < 25 36-42- 8- 8 Res: 5 to < 10 34-32-16-15 Paying Mortgage 30-43-14-11
MHP: 15 to < 25 39-39-10- 7 Kids in HH 18-41-21-18 *MHP: < 5 Years 32-43-14- 7 MHP: 25+ Years 44-36- 2-11
S15K to S25K 38-34-11- 8 MHP: 10 < 15 32-41-17- 9 Paying Mortgage 30-43-14-11 No. In HH: One 37-36-10-10
No. In HH: One 37-36-10-10 Res: Senior PK 41-41-10- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 31-48-14- 3 Women 35-38-12-10
Aggregate 37-37-12-10 Res: 10 to < 15 32-40-19- 6 S50K or More 20-55-14-11 Aggregate 37-37-12-10
Res: 15 to < 25 36-42- 8- 8 MHP: 15 to < 25 39-39-10- 7 55-64 33-44-13- 8 45-54 35-48- 6-10
45-54 35-48- 6-10 85+ 44-39- 0- 7 No. In HH: Two 40-37-12- 9 Men 39-37-12-10
Less Than $15K 35-37-11-13 Women 35-38-12-10 Women 35-38-12-10 Free and Clear 39-34-12- 9
Women 35-38-12-10 No. In HH: Two 40-37-12- 9 Aggregate 37-37-12-10 Res: 25+ Years 50-30- 3- 9
Res: 5 to < 10 34-32-16-15 Aggregate 37-37-12-10 Free and Clear 39-34-12- 9 MHP: 10 < 15 32-41-17- 9.
MHP: 5 to < 10 33-32-18-13 Less Than $15K 35-37-11-13 Men 39-37-12-10 No. In HH: Two 40-37-12- 9
35-64 33-44-13- 8 Men 39-37-12-10 $15K to $25K 38-34-11- 8 $25K to S35K 41-43- 8- 8
Res: 10 to < 15 32-40-19- 6 MHP: 25+ Years 44-36- 2-11 less Than S15K 35-37-11-13 Res: 15 to < 25 36-42- 8- 8
*MHP: < 5 Years 32-43-14- 7 $35K to S50K 29-36-29- 5 75-84 39-32-11-13 55-64 33-44-13- 8
MHP: 10 < 15 32-41-17- 9 No. In HH: One 37-36-10-10 Res: Senior PK 41-41-10- 4 S15K to $25K 38-34-11- 8
* Res: < 5 Years 31-48-14- 3 Free and Clear 39-34-12- 9 No. In.HH: One 37-36-10-10 85+ 44-39* 0- 7
Paying Mortgage 30-43-14-11 $15K to $25K 38-34-11- 8 MHP: 15 to < 25 39-39-10- 7 *MHP: < 5 Years 32-43-14- 7
Res: Family PK 29-30-16-21 65-74 42-33-16- 6 S25K to $35K 41-43- 8- 8 MHP: 15 to < 25 39-39-10- 7
$35K to S50K 29-36-29- 5 MHP: 5 to < 10 33-32-18-13 Res: 15 to < 25 36-42- 8- 8 Res: 10 to < 15 32-40-19- 6
No. In HH: 3+ 24-43-18-12 75-84 39-32-11-13 45-54 35-48- 6-10 65-74 42-33-16- 6
S50K or More 20-55-14-11 Res: 5 to < 10 34-32-16-15 Res: 25+ Years 50-30- 3- 9 $35K to S50K 29-36-29- 5
Kids in HH 18-41-21-18 Res: Family PK 29-30-16-21 MHP: 25+ Years 44-36- 2-11 Res: Senior PK 41-41-10- 4
18-44 11-43-26-17 Res: 25+ Years 50-30- 3- 9 85+ 44-39- 0- 7 * Res: < 5 Years 31-48-14- 3
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 17
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 15: Compared to Amenities in Park How Fair Is Rent
In comparison to the amenities provided by your park, is your rent . . . very
fair, somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
1. Very Fair 37 4. Very Unfair 10
2. Somewhat Fair 37 5. No Opinion 4
3. Somewhat Unfair 12
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
45-54 84-16- 0 18-44 54-43- 3 85+ 83- 7-10
$25K to S35K 84-16- 0 Kids in HH 59-38- 3 $15K to $25K 72-19- 9
85+ 83- 7-10 Res: Family PK 59-38- 3 Res: 25+ Years 80-12- 8
Res: Senior PK 82-14- 5 $35K to S50K 64-33- 2 No. In HH: One 73-20- 7
Res: 25+ Years 80-12- 8 MHP: 5 to < 10 66-32- 3 MHP: 25+ Years 80-13- 7
MHP: 25+ Years 80-13- 7 Res: 5 to < 10 66-31- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 78-16- 6
* Res: < 5 Years 79-17- 3 No. In HH: 3+ 67-31- 2 Free and Clear 74-21- 5
Res: 15 to < 25 79-16- 5 Res: 10 to < 15 73-26- 2 75-84 71-23- 5
MHP: 15 to < 25 78-16- 6 MHP: 10 < 15 73-26- 2 Res: 15 to < 25 79-16- 5
No. In MR: Two 77-21- 2 Paying Mortgage 74-25- 1 Women 73-22- 5
55-64 77-21- 2 S50K or More 75-25- 0 Res: Senior PK 82-14- 5
Men 76-21- 3 Less Than S15K 72-24- 4 Aggregate 74-22- 4
*MHP: < 5 Years 75-21- 4 75-84 71-23- 5 Less Than $15K 72-24- 4
$50K or More 75-25- 0 Women 73-22- 5 *MHP: < 5 Years 75-21- 4
65-74 75-22- 3 65-74 75-22- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 79-17- 3
Aggregate 74-22- 4 Aggregate 74-22- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 66-31- 3
Paying Mortgage 74-25- 1 *MHP: < 5 Years 75-21- 4 Res: Family PK 59-38- 3
Free and Clear 74-21- 5 55-64 77-21- 2 Kids in HH 59-38- 3
No. In HH: One 73-20- 7 Men 76-21- 3 65-74 75-22- 3
MHP: 10 < 15 73-26- 2 Free and Clear 74-21- 5 18-44 54-43- 3
Women 73-22- 5 No. In HH: Two 77-21- 2 Men 76-21- 3
Res: 10 to < 15 73-26- 2 No. In HH: One 73-20- 7 MHP: 5 to < 10 66-32- 3
Less Than S15K 72-24- 4 $15K to $25K 72-19- 9 $35K to S50K 64-33- 2
$15K to $25K 72-19- 9 * Res: < 5 Years 79-17- 3 No. In HH: 3+ 67-31- 2
75-84 71-23- 5 $25K to $35K 84-16- 0 55-64 77-21- 2
No. In HH: 3+ 67-31- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 78-16- 6 No. In HH: Two 77-21- 2
Res: 5 to < 10 66-31- 3 45-54 84-16- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 73-26- 2
MHP: 5 to < 10 66-32- 3 Res: 15 to < 25 79-16- 5 MHP: 10 < 15 73-26- 2
$35K to S50K 64-33- 2 Res: Senior PK 82-14- 5 Paying Mortgage 74-25- 1
Res: Family PK 59-38- 3 MHP: 25+ Years 80-13- 7 45-54 84-16- 0
Kids in HH 59-38- 3 Res: 25+ Years 80-12- 8 $25K to $35K 84-16- 0
18-44 54-43- 3 85+ 83- 7-10 S50K or More 75-25- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 18
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 16: Compared To Cost Of Housing Is Rent Fair
In comparison to the cost of other housing in Huntington Beach, is your
rent .. . very fair, somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
1. Very Fair 49 4. Very Unfair 6
2. Somewhat Fair 25 5. No Opinion 12
3. Somewhat Unfair 9
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
85+ 61-22- 0- 5 18-44 20-51-11- 9 MNP: 10 < 15 50-24-18- 6 Kids in HH 29-38- 9-15
S15K to S25K 60-23- 8- 4 No. In HH: 3+ 29-49- 8- 8 Res: 10 to < 15 50-26-16- 5 Res: Family PK 38-27-13-13
MHP: 25+ Years 60-19- 4- 4 *MHP: < 5 Years 29-43-11-11 S50K or More 39-36-16- 5 Less Than S15K 48-19- 9-11
Res: 25+ Years 59-18- 5- 5 Kids in HH 29-38- 9-15 75-84 50-15-13- 6 *MHP: < 5 Years 29-43-11-11
S25K to S35K 57-16- 5- 5 * Res: < 5 Years 38-38-10- 7 45-54 52-29-13- 6 Paying Mortgage 40-32- 9- 9
Res: Senior PK 54-24- 7- 3 S50K or More 39-36-16- 5 Res: Family PK 38-27-13-13 Res: 5 to < 10 42-28- 9- 9
No. In HH: One 54-18- 7- 7 S35K to S50K 40-36-10- 5 18-44 20-51-11- 9 MHP: 5 to < 10 44-30- 8- 9
Res: 15 to < 25 52-21- 6- 4 Paying Mortgage 40-32- 9- 9 *MHP: < 5 Years 29-43-11-11 18-44 20-51-11- 9
65-74 52-29- 5- 6 MHP: 5 to < 10 44-30- 8- 9 * Res: < 5 Years 38-38-10- 7 No. In HH: 3+ 29-49- 8- 8
Free and Clear 52-23- 9- 5 45-54 52-29-13- 6 No. In HH: Two 49-26-10- 5 55-64 50-25-10- 8
Men 52-26- 9- 6 65-74 52-29- 5- 6 55-64 50-25-10- 8 * Res: < 5 Years 38-38-10- 7
45-54 52-29-13- 6 Res: 5 to < 10 42-28- 9- 9 $35K to S50K 40-36-10- 5 No. In HH: One 54-18- 7- 7
MHP: 15 to < 25 50-20- 8- 5 Res: Family PK 38-27-13-13 Paying Mortgage 40-32- 9- 9 45-54 52-29-13- 6
55-64 50-25-10- 8 Men 52-26- 9- 6 Res: 5 to < 10 42-28- 9- 9 Women 47-25- 9- 6
75-84 50-15-13- 6 Res: 10 to < 15 50-26-16- 5 Less Than $15K 48-19- 9-11 Aggregate 49-25- 9- 6
MHP: 10 < 15 50-24-18- 6 No. in HH: Two 49-26-10- 5 Free and Clear 52-23- 9- 5 75-84 50-15-13- 6
Res: 10 to < 15 50-26-16- 5 55-64 50-25-10- 8 Men 52-26- 9- 6 Men 52-26- 9- 6
No. In HH: Two 49-26-10- 5 Aggregate 49-25- 9- 6 Kids in HH 29-38- 9-15 MHP: 10 < 15 50-24-18- 6
Aggregate 49-25- 9- 6 Women 47-25- 9- 6 Aggregate 49-25- 9- 6 65-74- 52-29- 5- 6
Less Than S15K 48-19- 9-11 MHP: 10 < 15 50-24-18- 6 Women 47-25- 9- 6 S25K'to $35K 57-16- 5- 5
Women 47-25- 9- 6 Res: Senior PK 54-24- 7- 3 No. In HH: 3+ 29-49- 8- 8 No. In HH: Two 49-26-10- 5
MHP: 5 to < 10 44-30- 8- 9 $15K to $25K 60-23- 8- 4 MHP: 5 to < 10 44-30- 8- 9 Free and Clear 52-23- 9- 5
Res: 5 to < 10 42-28- 9- 9 Free and Clear 52-23- 9- 5 MHP: 15 to < 25 50-20- 8- 5 85+ 61-22- 0- 5
$35K to S50K 40-36-10- 5 85+ 61-22- 0- 5 S15K to $25K 60-23- 8- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 50-26-16- 5
Paying Mortgage 40-32- 9- 9 Res: 15 to < 25 52-21- 6- 4 No. In HH: One 54-18- 7- 7 MHP: 15 to < 25 50-209 8- 5
S50K or More 39-36-16- 5 MHP: 15 to < 25 50-20- 8- 5 Res: Senior PK 54-24- 7- 3 $35K to,S50K 40-36-10- 5
* Res: < 5 Years 38-38-10- 7 MHP: 25+ Years 60-19- 4- 4 Res: 15 to < 25 52-21- 6- 4 Res: 25+ Years 59-18- 5- 5
Res: Family PK 38-27-13-13 Less Than $15K 48-19- 9-11 $25K to $35K 57-16- 5- 5 S50K or More 39-36-16- 5
Kids in HH 29-38- 9-15 Res: 25+ Years 59-18- 5- 5 65-74 52-29- 5- 6 Res: 15 to < 25 52-21- 6- 4
*MHP: < 5 Years 29-43-11-11 No. In HH: One 54-18- 7- 7 Res: 25+ Years 59-18- 5- 5 $15K to S25K 60-23- 8- 4
No. In HH: 3+ 29-49- 8- 8 S25K to $35K 57-16- 5- 5 MHP: 25+ Years 60-19- 4- 4 MHP: 25+ Years 60-19- 4- 4
18-44 20-51-11- 9 75-84 50-15-13- 6 85+ 61-22- 0- 5 Res: Senior PK 54-24- 7- 3
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 19
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 16: Compared To Cost Of Housing Is Rent Fair
In comparison to the cost of other housing in Huntington Beach, is your
rent . . . very fair, somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
1. Very Fair 49 4. Very Unfair 6
2. Somewhat Fair 25 5. No Opinion 12
3. Somewhat Unfair 9
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
S15K to S25K 83-11- 6 Res: Family PK 64-25-10 MHP: 15 to < 25 70-12-17
85+ 83- 5-12 MHP: 10 < 15 74-24- 2 S25K to S35K 73-11-16
65-74 81-11- 9 Kids in HH 68-24- 9 Res: 15 to < 25 73-11-16
45-54 81-19- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-21- 7 75-84 65-20-15
MHP: 25+ Years 79- 7-14 Res: 10 to < 15 76-21- 3 MHP: 25+ Years 79- 7-14
Res: Senior PK 78-10-12 S50K or More 75-20- 5 No. In HH: One 72-14-14
Men 78-15- 7 Less Than $15K 67-20-13 Women 71-15-14
No. In HH: 3+ 78-16- 6 18-44 71-20- 9 Res: 25+ Years 77- 9-14
Res: 25+ Years 77- 9-14 75-84 65-20-15 Less Than $15K 67-20-13
S35K to S50K 76-14-10 45-54 81-19- 0 85+ 83- 5-12
* Res: < 5 Years 76-17- 7 Paying Mortgage 72-19- 9 Res: Senior PK 78-10-12
Res: 10 to < 15 76-21- 3 Res: 5 to < 10 70-19-12 Free and Clear 74-14-12
$50K or More 75-20- 5 55-64 75-17- 8 Res: 5 to < 10 70-19-12
55-64 75-17- 8 * Res: < 5 Years 76-17- 7 Aggregate 74-15-12
Free and Clear 74-14-12 MHP: 5 to < 10 74-17-10 No. In HH: Two 74-15-11
No. In HH: Two 74-15-11 No. In HH: 3+ 78-16- 6 Res: Family PK 64-25-10
MHP: 10 < 15 74-24- 2 No. In HH: Two 74-15-11 MHP: 5 to < 10 74-17-10
MHP: 5 to < 10 74-17-10 Women 71-15-14 $35K to $50K 76-14-10
Aggregate 74-15-12 Aggregate 74-15-12 Paying Mortgage 72-19- 9
Res: 15 to < 25 73-11-16 Men 78-15- 7 Kids in HH 68-24- 9
$25K to S35K 73-11-16 S35K to $50K 76-14-10 65-74 81-11- 9
No. In HH: One 72-14-14 No. In HH: One 72-14-14 18-44 71-20- 9
Paying Mortgage 72-19- 9 Free and Clear 74-14-12 55-64 75-17- 8
18-44 71-20- 9 MHP: 15 to < 25 70-12-17 Men 78-15- 7
*MHP: < 5 Years 71-21- 7 S15K to S25K 83-11- 6 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-21- 7
Women 71-15-14 $25K to $35K 73-11-16 * Res: < 5 Years 76-17- 7
MHP: 15 to < 25 70-12-17 Res: 15 to < 25 73-11-16 No. In HH: 3+ 78-16- 6
Res: 5 to < 10 70-19-12 65-74 81-11- 9 $15K to S25K 83-11- 6
Kids in HH 68-24- 9 Res: Senior PK 78-10-12 $50K or More 75-20- 5
Less Than S15K 67-20-13 Res: 25+ Years 77- 9-14 Res: 10 to < 15 76-21- 3
75-84 65-20-15 MHP: 25+ Years 79- 7-14 MHP: 10 < 15 74-24- 2
Res: Family PK 64-25-10 85+ 83- 5-12 45-54 81-19- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 20
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 17: How Fair Are The Costs Of Repairs
And the costs of repairs that are passed along to you ... very fair,
somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
1. Very Fair 33 4. Very Unfair 5
2. Somewhat Fair 31 5. No Opinion 24
3. Somewhat Unfair 8
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
45-54 48-23-10- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-43- 7- 0 75-84 37-25-11- 4 55-64 33-40- 2-10
$15K to S25K 42-25- 8- 8 55-64 33-40- 2-10 * Res: < 5 Years 28-34-10- 0 $15K to $25K 42-25- 8- 8
S35K to S50K 40-36-10- 5 18-44 31-40- 9- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 35-35-10- 2 Res: Family PK 30-30- 7- 7
Res: 10 to < 15 39-24-10- 6 S50K or More 36-36- 7- 5 45-54 48-23-10- 3 Res: 10 to < 15 39-24-10- 6
Kids in HH 38-32- 9- 3 $35K to S50K 40-36-10- 5 Res: 10 to < 15 39-24-10- 6 Res: 15 to < 25 31-34- 6- 6
Res: 25+ Years 38-24- 6- 0 65-74 28-36-10- 5 MHP: 5 to < 10 32-35-10- 6 MHP: 5 to < 10 32-35-10- 6
MHP: 10 < 15 38-24- 8- 5 MHP: 5 to < 10 32-35-10- 6 65-74 28-36-10- 5 MHP: 15 to < 25 30-30- 7- 6
MHP: 25+ Years 37-26- 7- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 35-35-10- 2 $35K to S50K 40-36-10- 5 Paying Mortgage 32-30- 9- 6
75-84 37-25-11- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 28-34-10- 0 Paying Mortgage 32-30- 9- 6 Less Than $15K 26-24- 9- 6
S50K or More 36-36- 7- 5 Res: 5 to < 10 30-34- 9- 5 Less Than $15K 26-24- 9- 6 Men 35-30- 7- 5
No. In HH: Two 36-29- 7- 5 Res: 15 to < 25 31-34- 6- 6 Kids in HH 38-32- 9- 3 Res: 5 to-< 10 30-34- 9- 5
Men 35-30- 7- 5 $25K to S35K 22-32- 8- 0 18-44 31-40- 9- 0 No. In HH: Two 36-29- 7- 5
Res: Senior PK 35-31- 9- 4 Kids in HH 38-32- 9- 3 Res: Senior PK 35-31- 9- 4 65-74 28-36-10- 5
No. In HH: 3+ 35-35-10- 2 No. In HH: One 29-32- 8- 5 Res: 5 to < 10 30-34- 9- 5 S35K to $50K 40-36-10- 5
Aggregate 33-31- 8- 5 Free and Clear 33-31- 8- 4 $25K to $35K 22-32- 8- 0 $50K or More 36-36- 7- 5
55-64 33-40- 2-10 Women 32-31- 8- 4 No. In HH: One 29-32- 8- 5 MHP: 10 < 15 38-24- 8- 5
Free and Clear 33-31- 8- 4 Aggregate 33-31- 8- 5 Women 32-31- 8- 4 No. In HH: One 29-32- 8- 5
Paying Mortgage 32-30- 9- 6 Res: Senior PK 35-31- 9- 4 Aggregate 33-31- 8- 5 Aggregate 33-31- 8- 5
Women 32-31- 8- 4 MHP: 15 to < 25 30-30- 7- 6 MHP: 10 < 15 38-24- 8- 5 75-84 37-25-11- 4
MHP: 5 to < 10 32-35-10- 6 Res: Family PK 30-30- 7- 7 $15K to S25K 42-25- 8- 8 Free and Clear 33-31- 8- 4
,8-44 31-40- 9- 0 Paying Mortgage 32-30- 9- 6 Free and Clear 33-31- 8- 4 Women 32-31- 8- 4
Res: 15 to < 25 31-34- 6- 6 Men 35-30- 7- 5 Men 35-30- 7- 5 Res: Senior PK 35-31- 9- 4
Res: 5 to < 10 30-34- 9- 5 No. In HH: Two 36-29- 7- 5 MHP: 25+ Years 37-26- 7- 2 45-54 48-23-10- 3
Res: Family PK 30-30- 7- 7 85+ 29-27- 2- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-43- 7- 0 Kids in HH 38-32- 9- 3
MHP: 15 to < 25 30-30- 7- 6 MHP: 25+ Years 37-26- 7- 2 No. In.HH: Two 36-29- 7- 5 85+ 29-27* 2- 2
85+ 29-27- 2- 2 75-84 37-25-11- 4 S50K or More 36-36- 7- 5 MHP: 25+ Years 37-26- 7- 2
No. In HH: One 29-32- 8- 5 S15K to $25K 42-25- 8- 8 Res: Family PK 30-30- 7- 7 No. In HH: 3+ 35-35-10- 2
65-74 28-36-10- 5 Res: 25+ Years 38-24- 6- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 30-30- 7- 6 18-44 31-40- 9- 0
* Res: < 5 Years 28-34-10- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 38-24- 8- 5 Res: 15 to < 25 31-34- 6- 6 Res: 25+ Years 38-24- 6- 0
Less Than $15K 26-24- 9- 6 Res: 10 to < 15 39-24-10- 6 Res: 25+ Years 38-24- 6- 0 $25K to S35K 22-32- 8- 0
*MHP: < 5 Years 25-43- 7- 0 Less Than $15K 26-24- 9- 6 85+ 29-27- 2- 2 * Res: < 5 Years 28-34-10- 0
$25K to $35K 22-32- 8- 0 45-54 48-23-10- 3 55-64 33-40- 2-10 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-43- 7- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 21
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 17: How Fair Are The Costs Of Repairs
And the costs of repairs that are passed along to you ... very fair,
somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
1. Very Fair 33 4. Very Unfair 5
2. Somewhat Fair 31 5. No Opinion 24
3. Somewhat Unfair 8
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
$35K to $50K 76-14-10 Res: 10 to < 15 63-16-21 85+ 56- 5-39
55-64 73-12-15 MHP: 5 to < 10 67-16-18 $25K to S35K 54- 8-38
S50K or More 73-11-16 75-84 62-15-23 Less Than $15K 50-15-35
18-44 71- 9-20 Paying Mortgage 62-15-23 Res: 25+ Years 62- 6-32
45-54 71-13-16 S15K to $25K 66-15-19 MHP: 15 to < 25 60-12-28
Kids in HH 71-12-18 Less Than $15K 50-15-35 * Res: < 5 Years 62-10-28
No. In HH: 3+ 69-12-18 65-74 63-14-22 MHP: 25+ Years 63-10-27
*MHP: < 5 Years 68- 7-25 $35K to $50K 76-14-10 No. In HH: One 60-12-27
MHP: 5 to < 10 67-16-18 Res: 5 to < 10 64-14-22 Res: Family PK 60-13-27
$15K to $25K 66-15-19 Res: Family PK 60-13-27 MHP: 10 < 15 62-12-26
Res: Senior PK 66-12-22 Men 65-13-22 Women 63-12-25
No. In HH: Two 65-12-22 45-54 71-13-16 *MHP: < 5 Years 68- 7-25
Men 65-13-22 No. In HH: One 60-12-27 Free and Clear 64-12-24
Res: 15 to < 25 65-12-23 Res: 15 to < 25 65-12-23 Aggregate 64-12-24
Res: 5 to < 10 64-14-22 MHP: 15 to < 25 60-12-28 75-84 62-15-23
Free and Clear 64-12-24 No. In HH: Two 65-12-22 Res: 15 to < 25 65-12-23
Aggregate 64-12-24 Aggregate 64-12-24 Paying Mortgage 62-15-23
65-74 63-14-22 No. In HH: 3+ 69-12-18 No. In HH: Two 65-12-22
MHP: 25+ Years 63-10-27 MHP: 10 < 15 62-12-26 Res: Senior PK 66-12-22
Res: 10 to < 15 63-16-21 Res: Senior PK 66-12-22 65-74 63-14-22
Women 63-12-25 Women 63-12-25 Men 65-13-22
Paying Mortgage 62-15-23 Free and Clear 64-12-24 Res: 5 to < 10 64-14-22
Res: 25+ Years 62- 6-32 Kids in HH 71-12-18 Res: 10 to < 15 63-16-21
MHP: 10 < 15 62-12-26 55-64 73-12-15 18-44 71- 9-20
* Res: < 5 Years 62-10-28 S50K or More 73-11-16 $15K to $25K. 66-15-19
75-84 62-15-23 * Res: < 5 Years 62-10-28 No. In HH: 3+ 69-12-18
No. In HH: One 60-12-27 MHP: 25+ Years 63-10-27 Kids in HH 71-12-18
Res: Family PK 60-13-27 18-44 71- 9-20 MHP: 5 to < 10 67-16-18
MHP: 15 to < 25 60-12-28 S25K to $35K 54- 8-38 45-54 71-13-16
85+ 56- 5-39 *MHP: < 5 Years 68- 7-25 $50K or More 73-11-16
$25K to $35K 54- 8-38 Res: 25+ Years 62- 6-32 55-64 73-12-15
Less Than S15K 50-15-35 85+ 56- 5-39 $35K to $50K 76-14-10
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 22
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 18: How Fair Are The Park Rules
And the park rules . . . very fair, somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very
unfair?
1. very Fair 52 4. Very Unfair 3
2. Somewhat Fair 36 S. No Opinion 2
3. Somewhat Unfair 8
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
85+ 66-29- 2- 2 18-44 20-60-20- 0 Kids in HH 26-50-24- 0 45-54 48-26-16-10
Res: 25+ Years 65-29- 2- 3 Kids in HH 26-50-24- 0 S50K or More 39-39-23- 0 Less Than S15K 50-30- 6- 9
S25K to S35K 62-35- 3- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 31-47-20- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 31-47-20- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 57-25- 7- 7
MHP: 25+ Years 62-33- 1- 2 Res: Family PK 37-44-13- 6 18-44 20-60-20- 0 Paying Mortgage 40-40-13- 7
75-84 61-29- 5- 3 Men 48-42- 6- 1 45-54 48-26-16-10 Res: Family PK 37-44-13- 6
Res: Senior PK 59-32- 5- 2 Res: 5 to < 10 39-42-15- 5 MHP: 5 to < 10 41-39-15- 4 55-64 52-37- 4- 6
* Res: < 5 Years 59-28- 7- 3 Paying Mortgage 40-40-13- 7 Res: 5 to < 10 39-42-15- 5 $35K to S50K 50-36-10- 5
S15K to $25K 58-34- 2- 4 MHP: 5 to < 10 41-39-15- 4 Paying Mortgage 40-40-13- 7 Res: 5 to < 10 39-42-15- 5
No. In HH: One 58-32- 6- 3 S50K or More 39-39-23- 0 Res: Family PK 37-44-13- 6 MHP: 5 to < 10 41-39-15- 4
*MHP: < 5 Years 57-25- 7- 7 Res: 15 to < 25 53-38- 4- 2 S35K to S50K 50-36-10- 5 Warren 53-32- 9- 4
Res: 10 to < 15 56-32- 6- 3 MHP: 10 < 15 52-38- 6- 3 Warren 53-32- 9- 4 No. In HH; Two 51-37- 6- 4
Free and Clear 56-35- 6- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 51-37- 7- 2 65-74 49-37- 9- 3 $15K to S25K 58-34- 2- 4
Women 53-32- 9- 4 No. In HH: Two 51-37- 6- 4 Aggregate 52-36- 8- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 59-28- 7- 3
Res: 15 to < 25 53-38- 4- 2 65-74 49-37- 9- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 57-25- 7- 7 Aggregate 52-36- 8- 3
55-64 52-37- 4- 6 55-64 52-37- 4- 6 * Res: < 5 Years 59-28- 7- 3 Res: 10 to < 15 56-32- 6- 3
MHP: 10 < 15 52-38- 6- 3 Aggregate 52-36- 8- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 51-37- 7- 2 Res: 25+ Years 65-29- 2- 3
Aggregate 52-36- 8- 3 S35K to S50K 50-36-10- 5 Res: 10 to < 15 56-32- 6- 3 MHP: 10 < 15 52-38- 6- 3
MHP: 15 to < 25 51-37- 7- 2 $25K to S35K 62-35- 3- 0 No. In HH: Two 51-37- 6- 4 65-74 49-37- 9- 3
No. In HH: Two 51-37- 6- 4 Free and Clear 56-35- 6- 2 Men 48-42- 6- 1 No. In HH: One 58-32- 6- 3
S35K to S50K 50-36-10- 5 $15K to S25K 58-34- 2- 4 MHP: 10 < 15 52-38- 6- 3 75-84 61-29- 5- 3
-ess Than S15K .50-30- 6- 9 MHP: 25+ Years 62-33- 1- 2 Free and Clear 56-35- 6- 2 85+ 66-29- 2- 2
65-74 49-37- 9- 3 Women 53-32- 9- 4 No. In HH: One 58-32- 6- 3 MHP: 25+ Years 62-33- 1- 2
45-54 48-26-16-10 Res: 10 to < 15 56-32- 6- 3 Less Than $15K 50-30- 6- 9 Free and Clear 56-35- 6- 2
Men 48-42- 6- 1 No. In HH: One 58-32- 6- 3 Res: Senior PK 59-32- 5- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 31-47-20- 2
MHP: 5 to < 10 41-39-15- 4 Res: Senior PK 59-32- 5- 2 75-84 61-29- 5- 3 Res: Senior PK 59-32s 5- 2
Paying Mortgage 40-40-13- 7 Less Than $15K 50-30- 6- 9 Res: 15 to < 25 53-38- 4- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 51-37- 7- 2
Res: 5 to < 10 39-42-15- 5 75-84 61-29- 5- 3 55-64 52-37- 4- 6 Res: 15 to < 25 53-38- 4- 2
S50K or More 39-39-23- 0 85+ 66-29- 2- 2 $25K to S35K 62-35- 3- 0 Men 48-42- 6- 1
Res: Family PK 37-44-13- 6 Res: 25+ Years 65-29- 2- 3 85+ 66-29- 2- 2 Kids in HH 26-50-24- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 31-47-20- 2 * Res: < 5 Years 59-28- 7- 3 S15K to S25K 58-34- 2- 4 18-44 20-60-20- 0
Kids in HH 26-50-24- 0 45-54 48-26-16-10 Res: 25+ Years 65-29- 2- 3 S25K to S35K 62-35- 3- 0
18-44 20-60-20- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 57-25- 7- 7 MHP: 25+ Years 62-33- 1- 2 S50K or More 39-39-23- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 23
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 18: How Fair Are The Park Rules
And the park rules .. . very fair, somewhat fair, somewhat unfair, or very
unfair?
1. Very Fair 52 4. Very Unfair 3
2. Somewhat Fair 36 5. No Opinion 2
3. Somewhat Unfair 8
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
S25K to S35K 97- 3- 0 45-54 74-26- 0 Less Than $15K 80-15- 6
MHP: 25+ Years 95- 4- 1 Kids in HH 76-24- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 82-14- 4
85+ 95- 5- 0 $50K or More 77-23- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 86-10- 3
Res: 25+ Years 94- 5- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 78-22- 0 65-74 86-12- 3
$15K to S25K 92- 6- 2 18-44 80-20- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 89- 9- 3
Res: 15 to < 25 91- 6- 3 Paying Mortgage 79-20- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 91- 6- 3
Res: Senior PK 91- 7- 2 Res: 5 to < 10 81-19- 0 Men 90- 7- 2
Men 90- 7- 2 MHP: 5 to < 10 81-19- 0 Res: Senior PK 91- 7- 2
Free and Clear 90- 8- 2 Res: Family PK 81-19- 1 55-64 88-10- 2
75-84 90- 8- 2 Less Than S15K 80-15- 6 S15K to $25K 92- 6- 2
No. In HH: One 90- 8- 2 S35K to $50K 86-14- 0 Free and Clear 90- 8- 2
MHP: 10 < 15 89- 9- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 82-14- 4 75-84 90- 8- 2
Res: 10 to < 15 89-10- 2 Women 86-13- 1 No. In HH: Two 88-11- 2
MHP: 15 to < 25 89- 9- 3 65-74 86-12- 3 No. In HH: One 90- 8- 2
55-64 88-10- 2 Aggregate 88-11- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 89-10- 2
No. In HH: Two 88-11- 2 No. In HH: Two 88-11- 2 Res: 25+ Years 94- 5- 2
Aggregate 88-11- 2 * Res: < 5 Years 86-10- 3 MHP: 10 < 15 89- 9- 2
* Res: < 5 Years 86-10- 3 Res: 10 to < 15 89-10- 2 Aggregate 88-11- 2
Women 86-13- 1 55-64 88-10- 2 MHP: 25+ Years 95- 4- 1
S35K to $50K 86-14- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 89- 9- 2 Women 86-13- 1
65-74 86-12- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 89- 9- 3 Paying Mortgage 79-20- 1
*MHP: < 5 Years 82-14- 4 No. In HH: One 90- 8- 2 Res: Family PK 81-19- 1
Res: family PK 81-19- 1 75-84 90- 8- 2 MHP: 5 to < 10 81-19- 0
MHP: 5 to < 10 81-19- 0 Free and Clear 90- 8- 2 45-54 74-26- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 81-19- 0 Men 90- 7- 2 Res: 5 to < 10 81-19- 0
18-44 80-20- 0 Res: Senior PK 91- 7- 2 Kids in HH 76-24- 0
Less Than $15K 80-15- 6 Res: 15 to < 25 91- 6- 3 85+ 95- 5- 0
Paying Mortgage 79-20- 1 $15K to S25K 92- 6- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 78-22- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 78-22- 0 85+ 95- 5- 0 18-44 80-20- 0
SSOK or More 77-23- 0 Res: 25+ Years 94- 5- 2 $25K to S35K 97- 3- 0
Kids in HH 76-24- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 95- 4- 1 $35K to S50K 86-14- 0
45-54 74-26- 0 $25K to $35K 97- 3- 0 $50K or More 77-23- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 24
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 19: How Helpful Would Owners/Management Be With Problems
If you had a problem concerning yoru home or your park, how helpful do you
feel the owners and management of your mobile home park would be . . . very
helpful, somewhat helpful or not very helpful?
1. Very Helpful 50 3. Not Very Helpful 15
2. Somewhat Helpful 31 4. No Opinion 4
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
85+ 63-22-10- 5 * Res: < 5 Years 38-52- 7- 3 Res: Family PK 31-39-25- 5 75-84 54-23-15- 8
Res: Senior PK 60-27- 9- 4 18-44 29-51-17- 3 $50K or More 41-36-23- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 36-46-11- 7
MHP: 25+ Years 58-27-12- 2 $35K to $50K 38-50-10- 2 45-54 35-35-23- 6 45-54 35-35-23- 6
Res: 25+ Years 56-29-14- 2 Kids in HH 32-47-21- 0 Kids in HH 32-47-21- 0 No. In HH: One 52-31-11- 6
65-74 55-28-16- 1 No. In HH: 3+ 37-47-16- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 44-30-19- 6 Res: 5 to < 10 44-30-19- 6
MHP: 10 < 15 55-24-18- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 36-46-11- 7 MHP: 5 to < 10 45-32-18- 4 MHP: 15 to < 25 49-34-11- 6
$25K to $35K 54-32-11- 3 55-64 42-46-10- 2 MHP: 10 < 15 55-24-18- 3 Free and Clear 53-27-15- 5
Res: 15 to < 25 54-31-11- 4 Paying Mortgage 42-42-13- 2 No. in HH: Two 51-27-18- 4 Res: Family PK 31-39-25- 5
75-84 54-23-15- 8 Res: Family PK 31-39-25- 5 18-44 29-51-17- 3 85+ 63-22-10- 5
Res: 10 to < 15 53-27-16- 3 $50K or More 41-36-23- 0 65-74 55-28-16- 1 Women 50-30-15- 5
Free and Clear 53-27-15- 5 45-54 35-35-23- 6 No. In HH: 3+ 37-47-16- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 54-31-11- 4
S15K to S25K 53-30-15- 2 Less Than S15K 46-35-15- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 53-27-16- 3 MHP: 5 to < 10 45-32-18- 4
No. In HH: One 52-31-11- 6 MHP: 15 to < 25 49-34-11- 6 Women 50-30-15- 5 Aggregate 50-31-15- 4
No. In HH: Two 51-27-18- 4 Men 50-34-13- 3 75-84 54-23-15- 8 Res: Senior PK 60-27- 9- 4
Women 50-30-15- 5 MHP: 5 to < 10 45-32-18- 4 $15K to S25K 53-30-15- 2 Less Than S15K 46-35-15- 4
Aggregate 50-31-15- 4 S25K to $35K 54-32-11- 3 Free and Clear 53-27-15- 5 No. In HH: Two 51-27-18- 4
Men 50-34-13- 3 Aggregate 50-31-15- 4 Less Than $15K 46-35-15- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 38-52- 7- 3
MHP: 15 to < 25 49-34-11- 6 Res: 15 to < 25 54-31-11- 4 Aggregate 50-31-15- 4 Men 50-34-13- 3
Less Than $15K 46-35-15- 4 No. In HH: One 52-31-11- 6 Res: 25+ Years 56-29-14- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 53-27-16- 3
MHP: 5 to < 10 45-32-18- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 44-30-19- 6 Paying Mortgage 42-42-13- 2 MHP: 10 < 15 55-24-18- 3
tes: 5 to < 10 44-30-19- 6 $15K to $25K 53-30-15- 2 Men 50-34-13- 3 18-44 29-51-17- 3
Paying Mortgage 42-42-13- 2 Women 50-30-15- 5 MHP: 25+ Years 58-27-12- 2 E25K to $35K 54-32-11- 3
55-64 42-46-10- 2 Res: 25+ Years 56-29-14- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 49-34-11- 6 MHP: 25+ Years 58-27-12- 2
$50K or More 41-36-23- 0 65-74 55-28-16- 1 No. In HH: One 52-31-11- 6 $35K to $50K 38-50-10- 2
S35K to S50K 38-50-10- 2 No. In HH: Two 51-27-18- 4 S25K to $35K 54-32-11- 3 55-64 42-46a10- 2
* Res: < 5 Years 38-52- 7- 3 Res: 10 to < 15 53-27-16- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 36-46-11- 7 S15K to $25K 53-30-15- 2
No. In HH: 3+ 37-47-16- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 58-27-12- 2 Res: 15 to < 25 54-31-11- 4 Paying Mortgage 42-42-13- 2
*MHP: < 5 Years 36-46-11- 7 Res: Senior PK 60-27- 9- 4 85+ 63-22-10- 5 Res: 25+ Years 56-29-14- 2
45-54 35-35-23- 6 Free and Clear 53-27-15- 5 55-64 42-46-10- 2 65-74 55-28-16- 1
Kids in HH 32-47-21- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 55-24-18- 3 $35K to $50K 38-50-10- 2 Kids in HH 32-47-21- 0
Res: Family PK 31-39-25- 5 75-84 54-23-15- 8 Res: Senior PK 60-27- 9- 4 No. In HH: 3+ 37-47-16- 0
18-44 29-51-17- 3 85+ 63-22-10- 5 * Res: < 5 Years 38-52- 7- 3 $50K or More 41-36-23- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 25
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 20: Appointments Available in Reasonable Time Period
If you had something you wanted to discuss with the owners or management of
your mobile home park, do you feel you could make an appointment with them
within a reasonable period of time or not?
1. Yes 89 3. No Opinion 3
2. No 9
Format 1/2/3 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3
*MHP: < 5 Years 96- 0- 4 45-54 74-23- 3 S25K to S35K 86- 8- 5
S15K to S25K 94- 4- 2 Res: Family PK 81-16- 3 75-84 89- 5- 5
Res: 25+ Years 94- 6- 0 S50K or More 84-16- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 82-13- 5
* Res: < 5 Years 93- 3- 3 Less Than S15K 81-15- 4 MHP: 15 to < 25 88- 8- 5
MHP: 25+ Years 93- 6- 1 Kids in HH 85-15- 0 No. In HH: One 89- 7- 4
Res: Senior PK 93- 5- 3 18-44 86-14- 0 Paying Mortgage 87- 9- 4
55-64 92- 6- 2 S35K to $50K 83-14- 2 Less Than $15K 81-15- 4
Men 92- 5- 3 Res: 10 to < 15 82-13- 5 *MHP: < 5 Years 96- 0- 4
65-74 91- 9- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 88-12- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 90- 6- 4
Res: 15 to < 25 90- 6- 4 MHP: 10 < 15 85-12- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 93- 3- 3
75-84 89- 5- 5 MHP: 5 to < 10 87-11- 2 45-54 74-23- 3
No. In HH: One 89- 7- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 87-11- 2 MHP: 10 < 15 85-12- 3
Free and Clear 89- 9- 3 Women 87-10- 3 Res: Family PK 81-16- 3
Aggregate 89- 9- 3 85+ 88-10- 2 Women 87-10- 3
No. In HH: Two 88- 9- 2 Paying Mortgage 87- 9- 4 Aggregate 89- 9- 3
85+ 88-10- 2 No. In HH: Two 88- 9- 2 Res: Senior PK 93- 5- 3
No. In HH: 3+ 88-12- 0 65-74 91- 9- 0 Men 92- 5- 3
MHP: 15 to < 25 88- 8- 5 Free and Clear 89- 9- 3 Free and Clear 89- 9- 3
Women 87-10- 3 Aggregate 89- 9- 3 85+ 88-10- 2
MHP: 5 to < 10 87-11- 2 S25K to S35K 86- 8- 5 S35K to S50K 83-14- 2
Res: 5 to < 10 87-11- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 88- 8- 5 No. In HH: Two 88- 9- 2
Paying Mortgage 87- 9- 4 No. In HH: One 89- 7- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 87-11- 2
$25K to $35K 86- 8- 5 Res: 15 to < 25 90- 6- 4 55-64 92- 6- 2
18-44 86-14- 0 Res: 25+ Years 94- 6- 0 S15K to S25K 94- 4- 2
Kids in HH 85-15- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 93- 6- 1 MHP: 5 to < 10 87-11- 2 y
MHP: 10 < 15 85-12- 3 55-64 92- 6- 2 MHP: 25+ Years 93- 6- 1
S50K or More 84-16- 0 Men 92- 5- 3 Kids in HH 85-15- 0
$35K to S50K 83-14- 2 75-84 89- 5- 5 65-74 91- 9- 0
Res: 10 to < 15 82-13- 5 Res: Senior PK 93- 5- 3 18-44 86-14- 0
Less Than $15K 81-15- 4 S15K to $25K 94- 4- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 88-12- 0
Res: Family PK 81-16- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 93- 3- 3 Res: 25+ Years 94- 6- 0
45-54 74-23- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 96- 0- 4 S50K or More 84-16- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 26
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 21: Smith Feels Partiality / Jones Feels Equality
Here are the opinions of two people, call them Smith and Jones. After I
read them, please tell me whether you are like Smith or like Jones.
Smith feels that the owners and management of his park are giving
preferences or showing partiality to certain tenants that they aren't
giving to others. Jones feels that the owners and management of his park
are trying to give equal consideration to all tenants and are not
intentionally giving preferences or showing partiality.
1. Strongly Like Smith 9 4. Strongly Like Jones 45
2.. Somewhat Like Smith 11 5. No Opinion 11
3. Somewhat Like Jones 24
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
No. In HH: 3+ 18-18-27-24 Kids in HH 18-24-26-18 Res: Family PK 13-14-36-29 85+ 2-10-12-66
Kids in HH 18-24-26-18 45-54 13-23-19-42 18-44 11-20-34-20 MHP: 25+ Years 6- 7-21-55
$50K or More 16-14-20-43 55-64 6-21-23-42 $35K to $50K 7-10-33-40 Res: Senior PK 7- 9-18-54
MHP: 5 to < 10 14-10-25-39 * Res: < 5 Years 3-21-17-48 Paying Mortgage 13-13-27-33 *MHP: < 5 Years 4-18-18-54
Res: 5 to < 10 14- 9-26-38 18-44 11-20-34-20 No. In HH: 3+ 18-18-27-24 Res: 25+ Years 8- 8-23-53
Paying Mortgage 13-13-27-33 No. In HH: 3+ 18-18-27-24 Kids in HH 18-24-26-18 Free and 0lear 7-10-23-50
45-54 13-23-19-42 *MHP: < 5 Years 4-18-18-54 No. In HH: Two 8-12-26-47 less Than $15K 11- 7-20-50
Res: Family PK 13-14-36-29 MHP: 10 < 15 8-17-26-44 65-74 12-10-26-45 No. In HH: One 7- 8-21-49
65-74 12-10-26-45 $15K to E25K 4-15-23-47 Res: 10 to < 15 10-13-26-44 * Res: < 5 Years 3-21-17-48
18-44 11-20-34-20 Res: Family PK 13-14-36-29 MHP: 10 < 15 8-17-26-44 75-84 8- 4-24-48
Less Than.S15K 11- 7-20-50 S50K or More 16-14-20-43 MHP: 15 to < 25 10-11-26-40 S15K to S25K 4-15-23-47
525K.to $35K 11-14-16-41 E25K to $35K 11-14-16-41 Res: 5 to < 10 14- 9-26-38 Res: 15 to < 25 6-12-23-47
Res: 10 to < 15 10-13-26-44 Paying Mortgage 13-13-27-33 Men 9-10-25-45 No. In HH: Two 8-12-26-47
MHP: 15 to < 25 10-11-26-40 Res: 10 to < 15 10-13-26-44 MHP: 5 to < 10 14-10-25-39 65-74.- 12-10-26-45.
Women 9-12-23-45 Res: 15 to < 25 6-12-23-47 75-84 8- 4-24-48 Men 9-10-25-45
Aggregate 9-11-24-45 Women 9-12-23-45 Aggregate 9-11-24-45 Aggregate 9-11-24-45
Men 9-10-25-45 No. In HH: Two 8-12-26-47 Free and Clear 7-10-23-50 Women 9-12-23-45
No. In HH: Two 8-12-26-47 MHP: 15 to < 25 10-11-26-40 55-64 6-21-23-42 MHP: 10 < 15 8-17-26-44
75-84 8- 4-24-48 Aggregate 9-11-24-45 Res: 15 to < 25 6-12-23-47 Res: 10 to < 15 10-13-26-44
Res: 25+ Years 8- 8-23-53 Men 9-10-25-45 Women. . 9-12-23-45 S50K or More 16-14i20-43
MHP: 10 < :15 8-17-26-44 Free and Clear 7-10-23-50 Res: 25+ Years 8- 8-23-53 55-64 6-21-23-42
No. In HH: One 7- 8-21-49 85+ 2-10-12-66 $15K to E25K 4-15-23-47 45-54 13-23-19-42
$35K to $50K 7-10-33-40 MHP: 5 to < 10 14-10-25-39 MHP: 25+ Years 6- 7-21-55 E25K to $35K 11-14-16=41
Free and Clear 7-10-23-50 65-74 12-10-26-45 No. In HH: One 7- 8-21-49 $35K to $50K 7-10-33-40
Res: Senior PK 7- 9-18-54 $35K to $50K 7-10-33-40 S50K or More 16-14-20-43 MHP: 15 to < 25 10-11-26-40
Res: 15 to < 25 6-12-23-47 Res: Senior PK 7- 9-18-54 Less Than $15K 11- 7-20-50 MHP: 5 to < 10 14-10-25-39
MHP: 25+ Years 6- 7-21-55 Res: 5 to < 10 14- 9-26-38 45-54 13-23-19-42 Res: 5 to < 10 14- 9-26-38
55-64 6-21-23-42 No. In HH: One 7- 8-21-49 *MHP: < 5 Years 4-18-18-54 Paying Mortgage 13-13-27-33
S15K to S25K 4-15-23-47 Res: 25+ Years 8- 8-23-53 Res: Senior PK 7- 9-18-54 Res: Family PK 13-14-36-29
*MHP:•< 5 Years 4-18-18-54 Less Than S15K 11- 7-20-50 * Res: < 5 Years 3-21-17-48 No. In HH: 3+ 18-18-27-24
* Res: < 5 Years 3-21-17-48 MHP: 25+ Years 6- 7-21-55 S25K to $35K 11-14-16-41 18-44 11-20-34-20
85+ 2-10-12-66 75-84 8- 4-24-48 85+ 2-10-12-66 Kids in HH 18-24-26-18
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 27
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 21: Smith Feels Partiality / Jones Feels Equality
Here are the opinions of two people, call them Smith and Jones. After I
read them, please tell me whether you are like Smith or like Jones.
Smith feels that the owners and management of his park are giving
preferences or showing partiality to certain tenants that they aren't
giving to others. Jones feels that the owners and management of his park
are trying to give equal consideration to all tenants and are not
intentionally giving preferences or showing partiality.
1. Strongly Like Smith 9 4. Strongly Like Jones 45
2. Somewhat Like Smith 11 5. No opinion 11
3. Somewhat Like Jones 24
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
Kids in HH 41-44-15 85+ 12-78-10 $25K to S35K 24-57-19
No. In HH: 3+ 37-51-12 MHP: 25+ Years 13-76-11 75-84 13-72-15
45-54 35-61- 3 Res: 25+ Years 15-76- 9 Kids in HH 41-44-15
18-44 31-54-14 $35K to S50K 17-74-10 18-44 31-54-14
$50K or More 30-64- 7 Free and Clear 17-74- 9 No. In HH: One 16-70-14
55-64 27-65- 8 No. In HH: Two 20-73- 7 MHP: 15 to < 25 21-66-13
Res: Family PK 27-64- 9 75-84 13-72-15 Paying Mortgage 26-60-13
Paying Mortgage 26-60-13 *MHP: < 5 Years 21-71- 7 Res: 5 to < 10 23-64-13
S25K to $35K 24-57-19 Res: Senior PK 16-71-12 MHP: 5 to < 10 24-63-13
MHP: 10 < 15 24-70- 6 65-74 21-71- 8 Res: Senior PK 16-71-12
t Res: < 5 Years 24-66-10 Less Than $15K 19-70-11 No. In HH: 3+ 37-51-12
MHP: 5 to < 10 24-63-13 Men 19-70-11 Res: 15 to < 25 19-70-12
Res: 5 to < 10 23-64-13 No. In HH: One 16-70-14 $15K to S25K 19-70-11
Res: 10 to < 15 23-69- 8 Res: 15 to < 25 19-70-12 Less Than $15K 19-70-11
*MHP: < 5 Years 21-71- 7 $15K to $25K 19-70-11 Women 21-68-11
Women 21-68-11 MHP: 10 < 15 24-70- 6 Aggregate 21-69-11
65-74 21-71- 8 Res: 10 to < 15 23-69- 8 Men 19-70-11
MHP: 15 to < 25 21-66-13 Aggregate 21-69-11 MHP: 25+ Years 13-76-11
Aggregate 21-69-11 Women 21-68-11 * Res: < 5 Years 24-66-10
No. In HH: Two 20-73- 7 MHP: 15 to < 25 21-66-13 85+ 12-78-10
Men 19-70-11 * Res: < 5 Years 24-66-10 $35K to S50K 17-74-10
S15K to $25K 19-70-11 55-64 27-65- 8 Free and Clear 17-74- 9
Res: 15 to < 25 19-70-12 Res: Family PK 27-64- 9 Res: 25+ Years 15-76- 9
Less Than $15K 19-70-11 S50K or More 30-64- 7 Res: Family PK 27-64- 9
Free and Clear 17-74- 9 Res: 5 to < 10 23-64-13 Res: 10 to < 15 23-69- 8
S35K to $50K 17-74-10 MHP: 5 to < 10 24-63-13 65-74 21-71- 8
Res: Senior PK 16-71-12 45-54 35-61- 3 55-64 27-65- 8
No. In HH: One 16-70-14 Paying Mortgage 26-60-13 *MHP: < 5 Years 21-71- 7
Res: 25+ Years 15-76- 9 $25K to $35K 24-57-19 No. In HH: Two 20-73- 7 —
14HP: ,25+ Years 13-76-11 18-44 31-54-14 S50K or More 30-64- 7
75-84 13-72-15 No. in HH: 3+ 37-51-12 MHP: 10 < 15 24-70- 6
85+ 12-78-10 Kids in HH 41-44-15 45-54 35-61- 3
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 28
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 23: How Would You Renegotiate Your Lease
If you were negotiating the terms of your lease again, would you prefer to
have a month—to—month lease, a one—year lease, or more than a one—year
lease?
1. Month—To—Month Lease 18 3. More Than One—Year 23
2. One—Year Lease 35 4. No Opinion 25
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
*MHP: < 5 Years 25-46-14-14 MHP: 25+ Years 12-49-15-24 45-54 10-29-42-19 85+ 15-34-10-41
55-64 23-38-21-17 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-46-14-14 S50K or More 18-34-39- 9 No. In HH: One 15-34-17-33
18-44 23-26-37-14 Res: 25+ Years 14-45-15-26 Kids in HH 12-38-38-12 Less Than $15K 22-30-15-33
Less Then $15K 22-30-15-33 * Res: < 5 Years 21-45-24-10 18-44 23-26-37-14 MHP: 15 to < 25 18-32-18-31
Res: 5 to < 10 22-27-26-25 $15K to $25K 19-42-17-23 Paying Mortgage 20-34-34-12 Women 17-31-21-30
MHP: 5 to < 10 21-30-29-20 Men 18-41-24-16 MHP: 10 < 15 15-27-32-26 Free and Clear 16-35-19-30
No. In HH: Two 21-36-26-18 S25K to $35K 11-41-24-24 Res: 10 to < 15 15-32-31-23 Res: 15 to < 25 16-37-18-29
* Res: < 5 Years 21-45-24-10 55-64 23-38-21-17 No. In HH: 3+ 14-35-31-20 Res: Senior PK 17-37-18-27
Paying Mortgage 20-34-34-12 Kids in HH 12-38-38-12 Res: Family PK 19-31-30-20 65-74 15-37-21-27
75=84 20-35-21-25 Res: Senior PK 17-37-18-27 MHP: 5 to < 10 21-30-29-20 MHP: 10 < 15 15-27-32-26
$35K to S50K 19-36-29-17 Res: 15 to < 25 16-37-18-29 $35K to S50K 19-36-29-17 Res: 25+ Years 14-45-15-26
S15K to S25K 19-42-17-23 65-74 15-37-21-27 Res: 5 to < 10 22-27-26-25 Aggregate 18-35-23-25
Res: family PK 19-31-30-20 S35K to S50K 19-36-29-17 No. In HH: Two 21-36-26-18 75-84 20-35-21-25
Men 18-41-24-16 No. In HH: Two 21-36-26-18 Men 18-41-24-16 Res: 5 to < 10 22-27-26-25
S50K or More 18-34-39- 9 Free and Clear 16-35-19-30 S25K to S35K 11-41-24-24 S25K to S35K 11-41-24-24
MHP: 15 to < 25 18-32-18-31 Aggregate 18-35-23-25 * Res: < 5 Years 21-45-24-10 MHP: 25+ Years 12-49-15-24
Aggregate 18-35-23-25 75-84 20-35-21-25 Aggregate 18-35-23-25 S15K to S25K 19-42-17-23
Res: Senior PK 17-37-18-27 No. In HH: 3+ 14-35-31-20 Women 17-31-21-30 Res: 10 to < 15 15-32-31-23
Women 17-31-21-30 No. In HH: One 15-34-17-33 65-74 15-37-21-27 No. In HH: 3+ 14-35-31-20,
`es: 15 to < 25 16-37-18-29 85+ 15-34-10-41 55-64 23-38-21-17 MHP: 5 to < 10 21-30-29-20
ree and Clear 16-35-19-30 S50K or More 18-34-39- 9 75-84 20-35-21-25 Res: Family PK 19-31-30-20
65-74 15-37-21-27 Paying Mortgage 20-34-34-12 Free and Clear 16-35-19-30 45-54 10-29-42-19
No. In NH: One 15-34-17-33 MHP: 15 to < 25 18-32-18-31 Res: Senior PK 17-37-18-27 No. In HH: Two 21-36-26-18
MHP: 10 < 15 15-27-32-26 Res: 10 to < 15 15-32-31-23 MHP: 15 to < 25 18-32-18-31 55-64 23-38-21-17
85+ 15-34-10-41 Women 17-31-21-30 Res: 15 to < 25 16-37-18-29 S35K to S50K 19-36i29-17
Res: 10 to < 15 15-32-31-23 Res: Family PK 19-31-30-20 $15K to'S25K 19-42-17-23 Men 18-41-24-16
No. In HH: 3+ 14-35-31-20 MHP: 5 to < 10 21-30-29-20 No. In HH: One 15-34-17-33 18-44 23-26-37-14
Res: 25+ Years 14-45-15-26 Less Than S15K 22-30-15-33 MHP: 25+ Years 12-49-15-24 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-46-14.14
MHP: 25+ Years 12-49-15-24 45-54 10-29-42-19 Res: 25+ Years 14-45-15-26 Paying Mortgage 20-34-34-12
Kids in HH 12-38-38-12 MHP: 10 < 15 15-27-32-26 Less Than $15K 22-30-15-33 Kids in HH 12-38-38-12
S25K to S35K 11-41-24-24 Res: 5 to < 10 22-27-26-25 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-46-14-14 * Res: < 5 Years 21-45-24-10
45-54 10-29-42-19 18-44 23-26-37-14 85+ 15-34-10-41 S50K or More 18-34-39- 9
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 29
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 26: Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Your Park
As you may know, subleasing is where you own your coach and rent it out to
someone else. In general, do you favor or oppose the subleasing of mobile
homes within your park?
1. Favor 31 3. No opinion 15
2. Oppose 54
Format 1/2/3 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3
Kids in HH 53-41- 6 Res: 25+ Years 11-74-15 75-84 30-46-24
18-44 51-43- 6 MHP: 25+ Years 13-71-15 Less Than S15K 31-48-20
No. In HH: 3+ 49-41-10 65-74 22-71- 7 85+ 20-61-20
45-54 42-48-10 $50K or More 34-61- 5 MHP: 15 to < 25 31-50-18
Paying Mortgage 40-49-11 85+ 20-61-20 No. In HH: One 24-58-18
MHP: 10 < 15 39-44-17 115K to $25K 28-60-11 *MHP: < 5 Years 36-46-18
* Res: < 5 Years 38-45-17 S25K to $35K 30-59-11 Res: 10 to < 15 37-45-18
Res: 10 to < 15 37-45-18 No. In HH: One 24-58-18 Res: 15 to < 25 33-50-18
55-64 37-54-10 Free and Clear 27-57-16 * Res: < 5 Years 38-45-17
MHP: 5 to < 10 36-54-11 S35K to $50K 36-57- 7 Res: Senior PK 27-56-17
*MHP: < 5 Years 36-46-18 Women 29-56-15 MHP: 10 < 15 39-44-17 -
S35K to $50K 36-57- 7 Res: Senior PK 27-56-17 Men 33-51-16
Res: Family PK 36-52-13 No. In HH: Two 32-56-13 Free and Clear 27-57-16
Res: 5 to < 10 34-54-12 Res: 5 to < 10 34-54-12 MHP: 25+ Years 13-71-15
S50K or More 34-61- 5 Aggregate 31-54-15 Aggregate 31-54-15
Res: 15 to < 25 33-50-18 55-64 37-54-10 Res: 25+ Years 11-74-15
Men 33-51-16 MHP: 5 to < 10 36-54-11 Women 29-56-15
No. In HH: Two 32-56-13 Res: Family PK 36-52-13 No. In HH: Two 32-56-13
Less Than $15K 31-48-20 Men 33-51-16 Res: Family PK 36-52-13
MHP: 15 to < 25 31-50-18 MHP: 15 to < 25 31-50-18 Res: 5 to < 10 34-54-12
Aggregate 31-54-15 Res: 15 to < 25 33-50-18 $15K to S25K 28-60-11
75-84 30-46-24 Paying Mortgage 40-49-11 Paying Mortgage 40-49-11
$25K to $35K 30-59-11 45-54 42-48-10 S25K to $35K 30-59-11
Women 29-56-15 Less Than S15K 31-48-20 MHP: 5 to < 10 36-54-11
$15K to $25K 28-60-11 *MHP: < 5 Years 36-46-18 No. In HH: 3+ 49-41-10 "
Res: Senior PK 27-56-17 75-84 30-46-24 45-54 42-48-10
Free and Clear 27-57-16 Res: 10 to < 15 37-45-18 55-64 37-54-10
No. In HH: One 24-58-18 * Res: < 5 Years 38-45-17 S35K to $50K 36-57- 7
65-74 22-71- 7 MHP: 10 < 15 39-44-17 65-74 22-71- 7
85+ 20-61-20 18-44 51-43- 6 Kids in HH 53-41- 6
MHP: 25+ Years 13-71-15 Kids in HH 53-41- 6 18-44 51-43- 6
Res: 25+ Years 11-74-15 No. In HH: 3+ 49-41-10 $50K or More 34-61- 5
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 30
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 27: Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Or Down In Value
Do you feel your own mobile home is going up or going down in value?
1. Going Up 18 3. Staying The Same 15
2. Going Down 62 4. No Opinion 6
Format 1/2/3/4 Mc 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
MHP: 25+ Years 29-44-18-10 SISK to $25K 9-74-13- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 10-55-24-10 *MHP: < 5 Years 11-57-18-14
Res: 25+ Years 24-52-15- 9 MHP: 10 < 15 12-73-12- 3 85+ 17-56-20- 7 * Res: < 5 Years 10-55-24-10
45-54 23-65-10- 3 Res: 10 to < 15 10-71-16- 3 55-64 6-69-19- 6 MHP: 25+ Years 29-44-18-10
Men 22-59-15- 4 Paying Mortgage 9-70-14- 7 $25K to $35K 11-62-19- 8 Res: 25+ Years 24-52-15- 9
Free and Clear 21-60-14- 5 Res: 5 to < 10 17-70- 9- 5 No. In HH: Two 19-59-18- 4 No. In HH: 3+ 18-65- 8- 8
Res: 15 to < 25 20-57-18- 5 55-64 6-69-19- 6 *MHP: < 5 Years 11-57-18-14 $25K to $35K 11-62-19- 8
65-74 20-63-13- 3 MHP: 5 to < 10 17-68-11- 4 MHP: 25+ Years 29-44-18-10 No. In HH: One 16-64-12- 7
18-" 20-63-11- 6 Kids in HH 15-68-12- 6 Res: 15 to < 25 20-57-18- 5 85+ 17-56-20- 7
75-84 20-61-14- 5 Less Than SISK 19-67-13- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 15-64-17- 4 Res: Senior PK 17-60-16- 7
No. In HH: Two 19-59-18- 4 Res: Family PK 19-66-11- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 10-71-16- 3 $50K or More 14-64-16- 7
Res: Family PK 19-66-11- 4 No. In HH: 3+ 18-65- 8- 8 Res: Senior PK 17-60-16- 7 Women 15-64-14- 7
Less Than SISK 19-67-13- 2 45-54 23-65-10- 3 S50K or More 14-64-16- 7 Paying Mortgage 9-70-14- 7
No. In HH: 3+ 18-65- 8- 8 No. In HH: One 16-64-12- 7 Res: 25+ Years 24-52-15- 9 Kids in HH 15-68-12- 6
Aggregate 18-62-15- 6 $35K to $50K 17-64-14- 5 Men 22-59-15- 4 55-64 6-69-19- 6
Res: Senior PK 17-60-16- 7 MHP: 15 to < 25 15-64-17- 4 Aggregate 18-62-15- 6 Aggregate 18-62-15- 6
85+ 17-56-20- 7 $50K or More 14-64-16- 7 S35K to $50K 17-64-14- 5 18-44 20-63-11- 6
Res: 5 to < 10 17-70- 9- 5 Women 15-64-14- 7 75-84 20-61-14- 5 Free and Clear 21-60-14- 5
MHP: 5 to < 10 17-68-11- 4 65-74 20-63-13- 3 Free and Clear 21-60-14- 5 75-84 20-61-14- 5
S35K to S50K 17-64-14- 5 18-44 20-63-11- 6 Women 15-64-14- 7 Res: 15 to < 25 20-57-18- 5
No. In HH: One 16-64-12- 7 $25K to $35K 11-62-19- 8 Paying Mortgage 9-70-14- 7 $35K to $50K 17-64-14- 5
Women 15-64-14- 7 Aggregate 18-62-15- 6 65-74 20-63-13- 3 Res: 5-to < 10 17-70- 9- 5.
1HP: 15 to < 25 15-64-17- 4 75-84 20-61-14- 5 SISK to $25K 9-74-13- 4 MHP: 5 to < 10 17-68-11- 4
.ids in HH 15-68-12- 6 Res: Senior PK 17-60-16- 7 Less Than SISK 19-67-13- 2 Men 22-59-15- 4
SSOK or More 14-64-16- 7 Free and Clear 21-60-14- 5 MHP: 10 < 15 12-73-12- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 15-64-17- 4
MHP: 10 < 15 12-73-12- 3 Men 22-59-15- 4 No. In HH: One 16-64-12- 7 SISK to S25K 9-74-13- 4
$25K to $35K 11-62-19- 8 No. In HH: Two 19-59-18- 4 Kids in HH 15-68-12- 6 Res: Family PK 19-66-11- 4
*MHP: < 5 Years 11-57-18-14 *MHP: < 5 Years 11-57-18-14 18-44 20-63-11- 6 No. In HH: Two 19-59118- 4
* Res: < 5 Years 10-55-24-10 Res: 15 to < 25 20-57-18- 5 Res: Family PK 19-66-11- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 10-71-16- 3
Res: 10 to < 15 10-71-16- 3 85+ 17-56-20- 7 MHP: 5 to < 10 17-68-11- 4 45-54 23-65-10- 3
SISK to $25K 9-74-13- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 10-55-24-10 45-54 23-65-10- 3 MHP: 10 < 15 12-73-12= 3
Paying Mortgage 9-70-14- 7 Res: 25+ Years 24-52-15- 9 Res: 5 to < 10 17-70- 9- 5 65-74 20-63-13- 3
55-64 6-69-19- 6 MHP: 25+ Years 29-44-18-10 No. In NH: 3+ 18-65- 8- 8 less Than SISK 19-67-13- 2
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 31
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 28: Is It Going Up Because Of Your Park Or The Economy
Do you feel it is going up mainly because of your mobile home park . . . or
the economy in general?
1. Mobile Home Park 39 3. No Opinion 10
2. Economy In General 51
Format 1/2/3 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3
85+ 57-29-14 $35K to S50K 0-**- 0 55-64 33-33-33
Res: 15 to < 25 57-35- 9 No. In HH: 3+ 0-**- 0 Res: 25+ Years 44-25-31
MHP: 15 to < 25 56-31-13 Kids in HH 0-**- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 46-33-21
E25K to $35K SO-SO- 0 18-44 0-**- 0 $15K to S25K 20-60-20
No. In HH: Two 48-42- 9 Paying Mortgage 10-90- 0 S50K or More 17-67-17
MHP: 25+ Years 46-33-21 MHP: 10 < 15 13-88- 0 Res: Family PK 31-54-15
Res: 25+ Years 44-25-31 Res: 10 to < 15 17-83- 0 85+ 57-29-14
Women 44-44-13 Res: 5 to < 10 27-73- 0 No. In HH: One 41-45-14
Res: Senior PK 43-50- 7 MHP: 5 to < 10 32-68- 0 75-84 36-50-14
Free and Clear 43-45-12 * Res: < 5 Years 33-67- 0 Women 44-44-13
45-54 43-57- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 33-67- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 56-31-13
65-74 43-48-10 S50K or More 17-67-17 Free and Clear 43-45-12
No. In HH: One 41-45-14 $15K to E25K 20-60-20 Less Than $15K 30-60-10
Aggregate 39-51-10 Less Than S15K 30-60-10 Aggregate 39-51-10
75-84 36-50-14 Men 34-59- 6 65-74 43-48-10
Men 34-59- 6 45-54 43-57- 0 No. In HH: Two 48-42- 9
* Res: < 5 Years 33-67- 0 Res: Family PK 31-54-15 Res: 15 to < 25 57-35- 9
55-64 33-33-33 Aggregate 39-51-10 Res: Senior PK 43-50- 7
*MHP: < 5 Years 33-67- 0 75-84 36-50-14 Men 34-59- 6
MHP: 5 to < 10 32-68- 0 Res: Senior PK 43-50- 7 MHP: 10 < 15 13-88- 0
Res: Family PK 31-54-15 E25K to $35K 50-50- 0 Kids in HH 0-**- 0
Less Than S15K 30-60-10 65-74 43-48-10 18-44 0-**- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 27-73- 0 No. In HH: One 41-45-14 45-54 43-57- 0
$15K to $25K 20-60-20 Free and Clear 43-45-12 MHP: 5 to < 10 32-68- 0
Res: 10 to < 15 17-83- 0 Women 44-44-13 Paying Mortgage 10-90- 0
S50K or More 17-67-17 No. In HH: Two 48-42- 9 Res: 10 to < 15 17-83- 0
MHP: 10 < 15 13-88- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 57-35- 9 * Res: < 5 Years 33-67- 0
Paying Mortgage 10-90- 0 MHPc 25+ Years 46-33-21 No. In HH: 3+ 0-**- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 0-**- 0 55-64 33-33-33 *MHP: < 5 Years 33-67- 0
Kids in HH 0-**- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 56-31-13 E25K to $35K 50-50- 0
S35K to S50K 0-**- 0 85+ 57-29-14 $35K to S50K 0-**- 0
18-44 0-**- 0 Res: 25+ Years 44-25-31 Res: 5 to < 10 27-73- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 32
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 29: Going Down Because Of Your Park Or The Economy
Do you feel it is going down mainly because of your mobile home park ... or
the economy in general?
1. Mobile Home Park 19 3. No Opinion 11
2. Economy In General 69
Format 1/2/3 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3
Res: Family PK 31-55-13 65-74 11-83- 6 * Res: < 5 Years 6-75-19
45-54 30-60-10 S15K to $25K 13-82- 5 MHP: 15 to < 25 12-70-18
Res: 10 to < 15 30-61- 9 S35K to S50K 11-78-11 75-84 24-59-18
S50K or More 29-61-11 Res: Senior PK 13-77-10 85+ 9-74-17
Less Than $15K 28-64- 8 * Res: < 5 Years 6-75-19 Kids in HH 9-74-17
MHP: 10 < 15 27-69- 4 *MHP: < 5 Years 13-75-13 MHP: 25+ Years 22-62-16
55-64 25-69- 6 No. In HH: 3+ 13-75-13 Men 17-68-15
Res: 25+ Years 24-62-15 Kids in HH 9-74-17 Res: 25+ Years 24-62-15
75-84 24-59-18 85+ 9-74-17 Res: 15 to < 25 14-72-14
MHP: 5 to < 10 22-71- 8 Res: 5 to < 10 19-73- 8 Res: Family PK 31-55-13
$25K to $35K 22-65-13 18-44 18-73- 9 $25K to $35K 22-65-13
MHP: 25+ Years 22-62-16 Res: 15 to < 25 14-72-14 *MHP: < 5 Years 13-75-13
No. In HH: One 21-68-11 MHP: 5 to < 10 22-71- 8 No. In HH: 3+ 13-75-13
Free and Clear 21-69-10 No. In HH: Two 19-70-11 Paying Mortgage 18-70-12
Women 20-70- 9 Paying Mortgage 18-70-12 No. In HH: One 21-68-11
Aggregate 19-69-11 Women 20-70- 9 Aggregate 19-69-11
Res: 5 to < 10 19-73- 8 MHP: 15 to < 25 12-70-18 $35K to S50K 11-78-11
No. In HH: Two 19-70-11 55-64 25-69- 6 No. In HH: Two 19-70-11
18-44 18-73- 9 Aggregate 19-69-11 S50K or More 29-61-11
Paying Mortgage 18-70-12 Free and Clear 21-69-10 Res: Senior PK 13-77-10
Men 17-68-15 MHP: 10 < 15 27-69- 4 Free and Clear 21-69-10
Res: 15 to < 25 14-72-14 Men 17-68-15 45-54 30-60-10
Res: Senior PK 13-77-10 No. In HH: One 21-68-11 Women 20-70- 9
$15K to $25K 13-82- 5 $25K to $35K 22-65-13 Res: 10 to < 15 30-61- 9
No. in HH: 3+ 13-75-13 Less Than $15K 28-64- 8 18-44 18-73- 9
*MHP: < 5 Years 13-75-13 MHP: 25+ Years 22-62-16 Less Than $15K 28-64- 8
MHP: 15 to < 25 12-70-18 Res: 25+ Years 24-62-15 Res: 5 to < 10 19-73- 8
$35K to S50K 11-78-11 Res: 10 to < 15 30-61- 9 MHP: 5 to < 10 22-71- 8
65-74 11-83- 6 S50K or More 29-61-11 65-74 11-83- 6
85+ 9-74-17 45-54 30-60-10 55-64 25-69- 6
Kids in HH 9-74-17 75-84 24-59-18 $15K to S25K 13-82- 5
* Res: < 5 Years 6-75-19 Res: Family PK 31-55-13 MHP: 10 < 15 27-69- 4
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 33
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 30: Heard Of/Receive Assistance Programs For MHP Tenants
Have you ever heard or read anything about rental—assistance programs that
assist mobile home park tenants with their rent if they're having
difficulty paying? Are you receiving any such rental assistance?
1. Yes, Aware / Yes Receivincj 3 3. Yes, Aware / No Opinion Or Ref 4
2. Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 38 4. No, Unaware 56
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
Res: 25+ Years 8-47- 2-44 $15K to S25K 4-57- 4-36 18-44 3- 9- 9-80 18-44 3- 9- 9-80
Less Than S15K 7-48- 0-44 MHP: 10 < 15 0-50- 3-47 Kids in HH 3-12- 6-79 Kids in HH 3-12- 6-79
MHP: 25+ Years 6-49- 5-40 MHP: 25+ Years 6-49- 5-40 55-64 0-42- 6-52 45-54 0-23- 0-77
85+ 5-32- 0-63 $25K to $35K 3-49- 5-43 $25K to S35K 3-49- 5-43 No. In HH: 3+ 2-18- 4-76
No. In HH: One 4-43- 3-50 Res: 10 to < 15 0-48- 2-50 MHP: 25+ Years 6-49- 5-40 $50K or More 0-27- 0-73
$15K to S25K 4-57- 4-36 75-84 4-48- 3-46 Res: 5 to < 10 2-34- 5-60 *MHP: < 5 Years 0-25- 4-71
75-84 4-48- 3-46 Less Than $15K 7-48- 0-44 Res: 15 to < 25 3-34- 4-59 S35K to S50K 0-29- 2-69
Kids in HH 3-12- 6-79 Res: 25+ Years 8-47- 2-44 No. In HH: Two 1-38- 4-57 * Res: < 5 Years 0-28- 3-69
MHP: 15 to < 25 3-31- 3-63 No. In HH: One 4-43- 3-50 Men 2-38- 4-56 Paying Mortgage 2-31- 3-64
18-44 3- 9- 9-80 55-64 0-42- 6-52 No. In HH: 3+ 2-18- 4-76 85+ 5-32- 0-63
Women 3-38- 3-57 Free and Clear 3-41- 3-53 65-74 2-41- 4-53 MHP: 5 to.< 10 1-32- 4-63
Res: Senior PK 3-40- 3-54 65-74 2-41- 4-53 $15K to $25K 4-57- 4-36 MHP: 15 to < 25 3-31- 3-63
$25K to $35K 3-49- 5-43 Res: Senior PK 3-40- 3-54 Res: Family PK 2-36- 4-59 Res: 5 to < 10 2-34- 5-60
Res: 15 to < 25 3-34- 4-59 Men 2-38- 4-56 *MHP: < 5 Years 0-25- 4-71 Res: 15 to < 25 3-34- 4-59
Free and Clear 3-41- 3-53 No. In HH: Two 1-38- 4-57 MHP: 5 to < 10 1-32- 4-63 Res: Family PK 2-36- 4-59
Aggregate 3-38- 4-56 Aggregate 3-38- 4-56 Aggregate 3-38- 4-56 No. In HH: Two 1-38- 4-57
Res: Family PK 2-36- 4-59 Women 3-38- 3-57 * Res: < 5 Years 0-28- 3-69 Women 3-38- 3-57
Men 2-38- 4-56 Res: Family PK 2-36- 4-59 Free and Clear 3-41- 3-53 Aggregate 3-38- 4-56
No. In HH: 3+ 2-18- 4-76 Res: 5 to < 10 2-34- 5-60 Women 3-38- 3-57 Men 2-38- 4-56
65-74 2-41- 4-53 Res: 15 to < 25 3-34- 4-59 Res: Senior PK 3-40- 3-54 Res: Senior PK 3-40- 3-51
Paying Mortgage 2-31- 3-64 MHP: 5 to < 10 1-32- 4-63 MHP: 10 < 15 0-50- 3-47 65-74 2-41- 4-51
Res: 5 to < 10 2-34- 5-60 85+ 5-32- 0-63 MHP: 15 to < 25 3-31- 3-63 Free and Clear 3-41- 3-53
No. In HH: Two 1-38- 4-57 MHP: 15 to < 25 3-31- 3-63 Paying Mortgage 2-31- 3-64 55-64 0-42- 6-52
MHP: 5 to < 10 1-32- 4-63 Paying Mortgage 2-31- 3-64 No. In HH: One 4-43- 3-50 No. In HH: One 4-43- 3-50
MHP: 10 < 15 0-50- 3-47 $35K to $50K 0-29- 2-69 75-84 4-48- 3-46 Res: 10 to < 15 0-48,L 2-50
Res: 10 to < 15 0-48- 2-50 * Res: < 5 Years 0-28- 3-69 S35K to $50K 0-29- 2-69 MHP: 10. < 15 0-50- 3-47
55-64 0-42- 6-52 $50K or More 0-27- 0-73 Res: 10 to < 15 0-48- 2-50 75-84 4-48- 3-46
* Res: < 5 Years 0-28- 3-69 *MHP: < 5 Years 0-25- 4-71 Res: 25+ Years 8-47- 2-44 Less Than $15K 7-48- 0=44
*MHP: < 5 Years 0-25- 4-71 45-54 0-23- 0-77 85+ 5-32- 0-63 Res: 25+ Years 8-47- 2-44
45-54 0-23- 0-77 No. In HH: 3+ 2-18- 4-76 45-54 0-23- 0-77 S25K to $35K 3-49- 5-43
$35K to S50K 0-29- 2-69 Kids in HH 3-12- 6-79 Less Than $15K 7-48- 0-44 MHP: 25+ Years 6-49- 5-40
$50K or More 0-27- 0-73 18-44 3- 9- 9-80 $50K or More 0-27- 0-73 $15K to S25K 4-57- 4-36
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 34
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 31: How Long Do You Plan To Stay In Your Present Home
Now think again of your own home. How long do you plan to stay in your
present residence?
1. Less Than 3 Years 11 5. 15 Years To Less Than 25 2
2. 3 Years To Less Than 5 3 6. 25 Years Or More 1
3. 5 Years To Less Than 10 2 7. Forever / No Plans To Move 69
4. 10 Years To Less Than 15 3 8. No Opinion / Refused 10
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
18-44 31-14- 6- 6 18-44 31-14- 6- 6 $35K to $50K 21-12- 7- 5 45-54 13- 3- 3-13
Kids in HH 29- 6- 6- 6 $35K to $50K 21-12- 7- 5 No. In NN: 3+ 27- 4- 6- 4 S50K or More 20- 7- 0- 9
No. In HH: 3+ 27- 4- 6- 4 S50K or More 20- 7- 0- 9 Kids in HH 29- 6- 6- 6 Paying Mortgage 20- 5- 2- 7
Res: Family PK 22- 6- 3- 4 Res: Family PK 22- 6- 3- 4 18-44 31-14- 6- 6 MHP: 5 to < 10 11- 3- 4- 6
S35K to S50K 21-12- 7- 5 Kids in HH 29- 6- 6- 6 Res: 5 to < 10 9- 5- 4- 5 Kids in HH 29- 6- 6- 6
55-64 21- 4- 4- 4 Paying Mortgage 20- 5- 2- 7 55-64 21- 4- 4- 4 18-44 31-14- 6- 6
* Res: < 5 Years 21- 0- 3- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 9- 5- 4- 5 S15K to S25K 4- 2- 4- 2 Res: 5 to < 10 9- 5- 4- 5
S50K or More 20- 7- 0- 9 MHP: 10 < 15 12- 5- 2- 5 *MHP: < 5 Years 18- 4- 4- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 15- 2- 0- 5
Paying Mortgage 20- 5- 2- 7 No. In HH: 3+ 27- 4- 6- 4 MHP: 5 to < 10 11- 3- 4- 6 S35K to $50K 21-12- 7- 5
*MHP: < 5 Years 18- 4- 4- 0 55-64 21- 4- 4- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 21- 0- 3- 0 Men - 14- 3- 3- 5
Res: 10 to < 15 15- 2- 0- 5 *MHP: < 5 Years 18- 4- 4- 0 45-54 13- 3- 3-13 MHP: 10 < 15 12- 5- 2- 5
Men 14- 3- 3- 5 Men 14- 3- 3- 5 Res: Family PK 22- 6- 3- 4 Res: Family PK 22- 6- 3- 4
45-54 13- 3- 3-13 45-54 13- 3- 3-13 Men 14- 3- 3- 5 No. In HH: Two 8- 3- 2- 4
MHP: 10 < 15 12- 5- 2- 5 No. In HH: Two 8- 3- 2- 4 $25K to $35K 11- 3- 3- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 27- 4- 6- 4
MHP: 5 to < 10 11- 3- 4- 6 65-74 8- 3- 1- 1 Free and Clear 8- 2- 3- 1 55-64 21- 4- 4- 4
Aggregate 11- 3- 2- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 10- 3- 2- 0 Aggregate 11- 3- 2- 3 Aggregate 11- 3- 2- 3
Less Than S15K 11- 2- 0- 2 Aggregate 11- 3- 2- 3 Women 10- 2- 2- 2 Res: Senior PK 6- 1- 2- 2
S25K to $35K 11- 3- 3- 0 $25K to $35K 11- 3- 3- 0 Res: Senior PK 6- 1- 2- 2 $15K to S25K 4- 2- 4- 2
Res: 25+ Years 11- 2- 2- 2 Res: 15 to < 25 10- 3- 2- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 10- 3- 2- 0 Less Than $15K 11- 2- 0- 2
MHP: 15 to < 25 10- 3- 2- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 11- 3- 4- 6 Paying Mortgage 20- 5- 2- 7 75-84 6- 0- 2- 2
Women 10- 2- 2- 2 Women 10- 2- 2- 2 75-84 6- 0- 2- 2 Women 10- 2- 2- 2
Res: 15 to < 25 10- 3- 2- 0 No. In HH: One 10- 2- 2- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 10- 3- 2- 0 Res: 25+ Years 11- 2- 2- 2
No. In HH: One 10- 2- 2- 1 Free and Clear 8- 2- 3- 1 No. In HH: Two 8- 3- 2- 4 MHP: 25+ Years 10- 1- 1- 1
MHP: 25+ Years 10- 1- 1- 1 S15K to $25K 4- 2- 4- 2 No. In HH: One 10- 2- 2- 1 No. In HH: One 10- 2� 2- 1
Res: 5 to < 10 9- 5- 4- 5 Less Than S15K 11- 2- 0- 2 MHP: 10 < 15 12- 5- 2- 5 Free and Clear 8- 2- 3- 1
No. In HH: Two 8- 3- 2- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 15- 2- 0- 5 Res: 25+ Years 11- 2- 2- 2 65-74 ' 8- 3- 1- 1
Free and Clear 8- 2- 3- 1 Res: 25+ Years 11- 2- 2- 2 MHP: 25+ Years 10- 1- 1- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 10- 3- 2= 0
65-74 8- 3- 1- 1 MHP: 25+ Years 10- 1- 1- 1 65-74 8- 3- 1- 1 85+ 5- 0- 0- 0
75-84 6- 0- 2- 2 Res: Senior PK 6- 1- 2- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 15- 2- 0- 5 *MHP: < 5 Years 18- 4- 4- 0
Res: Senior PK 6- 1- 2- 2 85+ 5- 0- 0- 0 85+ 5- 0- 0- 0 $25K to $35K 11- 3- 3- 0
85+ 5- 0- 0- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 21- 0- 3- 0 Less Than $15K 11- 2- 0- 2 * Res: < 5 Years 21- 0- 3- 0
$15K to S25K 4- 2- 4- 2 75-84 6- 0- 2- 2 S50K or More 20- 7- 0- 9 MHP: 15 to < 25 10- 3- 2- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 35
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 31: How Long Do You Plan To Stay In Your Present Home
Now think again of your own home. How long do you plan to stay in your
present residence?
1. Less Than 3 Years 11 5. 15 Years To Less Than 25 2
2. 3 Years To Less Than 5 3 6. 25 Years Or More 1
3. 5 Years To Less Than 10 2 7. Forever / No Plans To Move 69
4. 10 Years To Less Than 15 3 S. No Opinion / Refused 10
Format 5/6/7/8 MC 1
Rank 5, 6, 7, 8
$50K or More 9- 0-45- 9 18-44 6- 3-20-14 85+ 0- 0-88- 7 MHP: 5 to < 10 4- 1-57-15
Kids in HH 6- 0-35-12 $35K to S50K 2- 2-38-12 $15K to $25K 0- 0-83- 6 18-44 6- 3-20-14
18-44 6- 3-20-14 Res: Family PK 4- 2-47-11 75-84 1- 2-80- 7 Res: 5 to < 10 3- 1-60-13
Res: Family PK 4- 2-47-11 No. In NH: 3+ 4- 2-43-10 Res: Senior PK 0- 0-80- 9 Less Than S15K 2- 0-70-13
No. In HH: 3+ 4- 2-43-10 75-84 1- 2-80- 7 Res: 15 to < 25 1- 0-79- 6 45-54 3- 0-52-13
55-64 4- 0-54-10 Res: 10 to < 15 0- 2-69- 8 $25K to S35K 0- 0-78- 5 S35K to 850K 2- 2-38-12
Paying Mortgage 4- 1-52-10 MHP: 10 < 15 0- 2-68- 8 65-74 1- 0-T7-10 Kids in HH 6- 0-35-12
*MHP: < 5 Years 4- 0-64- 7 Res: 25+ Years 2- 2-71-11 MHP: 15 to < 25 1- 0-76- 8 Res: Family PK 4- 2-47-11
MHP: 5 to < 10 4- 1-57-15 MHP: 25+ Years 1- 1-76- 8 MHP: 25+ Years 1- 1-76- 8 Women 2- 1-70-11
* Res: < 5 Years 3- 0-62-10 Women 2- 1-70-11 Free and Clear 1- 1-76- 9 No. In HH: One 2- 1-72-11
45-54 3- 0-52-13 No. In HH: One 2- 1-72-11 No. In HH: Two 1- 0-74- 8 Res: 25+ Years 2- 2-71-11
Res: 5 to < 10 3- 1-60-13 Paying Mortgage 4- 1-52-10 No. In HH: One 2- 1-72-11 Paying Mortgage 4- 1-52-10
$35K to S50K 2- 2-38-12 MHP: 5 to < 10 4- 1-57-15 Res: 25+ Years 2- 2-71-11 * Res: < 5 Years 3- 0-62-10
Women 2- 1-70-11 Res: 5 to < 10 3- 1-60-13 Less Than $15K 2- 0-70-13 No. In HH: 3+ 4- 2-43-10
Less Than S15K 2- 0-70-13 Aggregate 2- 1-69-10 Women 2- 1-70-11 Aggregate 2- 1-69-10
Aggregate 2- 1-69-10 Free and Clear 1- 1-76- 9 Res: 10 to < 15 0- 2-69- 8 65-74 1- 0-77-10
No. In HH: One 2- 1-72-11 * Res: < 5 Years 3- 0-62-10 Aggregate 2- 1-69-10 55-64 4- 0-54-10
Res: 25+ Years 2- 2-71-11 *MHP: < 5 Years 4- 0-64- 7 MHP: 10 < 15 0- 2-68- 8 $50K or More 9- 0-45- 9.
MHP: 25+ Years 1- 1-76- 8 Res: 15 to < 25 1- 0-79- 6 Men 1- 0-67- 7 Free and Clear 1- 1-76- 9
No. In HH: Two 1- 0-74- 8 No. In HH: Two 1- 0-74- 8 *MHP: < 5 Years 4- 0-64- 7 Res: Senior PK 0- 0-80- S
Free and Clear 1- 1-76- 9 Res: Senior PK 0- 0-80- 9 * Res: < 5 Years 3- 0-62-10 MHP: 25+ Years 1- 1-76- 8
65-74 1- 0-77-10 Men 1- 0-67- 7 Res: 5 to < 10 3- 1-60-13 No. In HH: Two 1- 0-74- 8
MHP: 15 to < 25 1- 0-76- 8 45-54 3- 0-52-13 MHP: 5 to < 10 4- 1-57-15 Res: 10 to < 15 0- 2-69- 8
75-84 1- 2-80- 7 MHP: 15 to < 25 1- 0-76- 8 55-64 4- 0-54-10 MHP: 15 to < 25 1- 0"-76- 8
Res: 15 to < 25 1- 0-79- 6 65-74 1- 0-T7-10 Paying Mortgage 4- 1-52-10 MHP: 10 < 15 0- 2-68- 8
Men 1- 0-67- 7 Kids in HH 6- 0-35-12 45-54 3- 0-52-13 Men 1- 0-67- 7
Res: Senior PK 0- 0-80- 9 85+ 0- 0-88- 7 Res: Family PK 4- 2-47-11 85+ 0- 0-88= 7
85+ 0- 0-88- 7 Less Than $15K 2- 0-70-13 $50K or More 9- 0-45- 9 75-84 1- 2-80- 7
Res: 10 to < 15 0- 2-69- 8 S15K to S25K 0- 0-83- 6 No. In NH: 3+ 4- 2-43-10 *MHP: < 5 Years 4- 0-64- 7
S25K to S35K 0- 0-78- 5 $25K to S35K 0- 0-78- 5 $35K to $50K 2- 2-38-12 Res: 15 to < 25 1- 0-79- 6
MHP: 10 < 15 0- 2-68- 8 55-64 4- 0-54-10 Kids in HH 6- 0-35-12 S15K to $25K 0- 0-83- 6
$15K to S25K 0- 0-83- 6 $50K or More 9- 0-45- 9 18-44 6- 3-20-14 $25K to $35K 0- 0-78- 5
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 36
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 32: What Type of Residence Would You.Prefer
If you were to move to another residence, which of these would be your
preference?
1. Mobile Home 40 4. Condo 10
2. Single Family Detached Home 25 5. Apartment 7
3. Duplex Or Fourplex 2 6. No Opinion 17
Format 1/2/3 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3
MHP: 25+ Years 52-12- 2 18-44 6-71- 3 Res: 10 to < 15 34-29- 5
Res: 25+ Years 52-12- 2 Kids in HH 9-62- 3 MHP: 10 < 15 35-23- 5
$25K to E35K 51-22- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 16-55- 2 75-84 45-16- 4
85+ 51- 5- 0 S50K or More 18-52- 0 Res: Family PK 30-34- 3
65-74 50-22- 2 Paying Mortgage 24-45- 1 Kids in HH 9-62- 3
MHP: 15 to < 25 50-19- 1 45-54 19-45- 0 18-44 6-71- 3
Res: 15 to < 25 48-17- 2 MHP: 5 to < 10 28-40- 1 MHP: 25+ Years 52-12- 2
S15K to S25K 47-23- 2 Res: 5 to < 10 30-36- 1 E35K to S50K 29-33- 2
Less Than $15K 46-15- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-36- 0 No. In HH: One 42-16- 2
free and Clear 46-18- 2 Res: Family PK 30-34- 3 Free and Clear 46-18- 2
Res: Senior PK 45-21- 1 E35K to $50K 29-33- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 16-55- 2
75-84 45-16- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 34-31- 0 Women 40-23- 2
No. In HH: Two 44-26- 1 Men 40-29- 1 65-74 50-22- 2
No. In.HH: One 42-16- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 34-29- 5 $15K to $25K 47-23- 2
55-64 40-27- 0 55-64 40-27- 0 Less Than $15K 46-15- 2
Men 40-29- 1 No. In HH: Two 44-26- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 48-17- 2
Aggregate 40-25- 2 Aggregate 40-25- 2 Aggregate 40-25- 2
Women 40-23- 2 Women 40-23- 2 Res: 25+ Years 52-12- 2
MHP: 10 < 15 35-23- 5 MHP: 10 < 15 35-23- 5 Men 40-29- 1
t Res: < 5 Years 34-31- 0 $15K to S25K 47-23- 2 No. In HH: Two 44-26- 1
Aes: 10 to < 15 34-29- 5 65-74 50-22- 2 Res: Senior PK 45-21- 1
Res: 5 to < 10 30-36- 1 S25K to E35K 51-22- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 50-19- 1
Res: Family PK 30-34- 3 Res: Senior PK 45-21- 1 Paying Mortgage 24-45- 1
E35K to S50K 29-33- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 50-19- 1 MHP: 5 to < 10 28-40- 1
MHP: 5 to < 10 28-40- 1 Free and Clear 46-18- 2 Res: 5 to < 10 30-36- 1
*MHP: < 5 Years 25-36- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 48-17- 2 45-54 19-45- 0
Paying Mortgage 24-45- 1 No. In HH: One 42-16- 2 85+ 51- 5- 0
45-54 19-45- 0 75-84 45-16- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 34-31- 0
$50K or More 18-52- 0 Less Than S15K 46-15- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-36- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 16-55- 2 Res: 25+ Years 52-12- 2 $25K to E35K 51-22- 0
Kids in HH 9-62- 3 MHP: 25+ Years 52-12- 2 55-64 40-27- 0
18-44 6-71- 3 85+ 51- 5- 0 S50K or More 18-52- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 37
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 32: What Type Of Residence Would You Prefer
If you were to move to another residence, which of these would be your
preference?
1. Mobile Home 40 4. Condo 10
2. Single Family Detached Home 25 5. Apartment 7
3. Duplex Or Fourplex 2 6. No Opinion 17
Format 4/5/6 MC 1
Rank 4, 5, 6
45-54 19- 3-13 55-64 12-12-10 85+ 0- 7-37
S50K or More IS- 0-11 Less Than S15K 6-11-20 *MHP: < 5 Years 11- 4-25
Res: 5 to < 10 15- 8-10 No. In HH: One 8-11-20 MHP: 25+ Years 6- 6-21
MHP: 5 to < 10 13- 7-11 MHP: 10 < 15 9-11-18 Res: 25+ Years 6- 8-21
Men 12- 4-13 75-84 11-10-15 * Res: < 5 Years 10- 3-21
S35K to S50K 12- 7-17 Women 8- 9-19 Less Than S15K 6-11-20
55-64 12-12-10 Res: 10 to < 15 5- 8-19 No. In HH: One 8-11-20
Paying Mortgage 11- 7-12 Res: 5 to < 10 15- 8-10 Res: 15 to < 25 8- 6-19
Res: Family PK 11- 7-16 Res: 25+ Years 6- 8-21 Res: 10 to < 15 5- 8-19
75-84 11-10-15 $15K to $25K 6- 8-15 Women 8- 9-19
*MHP: < 5 Years 11- 4-25 Free and Clear 9- 8-18 $25K to $35K 3- 5-19
No. In HH: Two 11- 4-14 Res: Senior PK 9- 7-16 MHP: 10 < 15 9-11-18
* Res: < 5 Years 10- 3-21 85+ 0- 7-37 Kids in HH 6- 3-18
No. In HH: 3+ 10- 4-12 S35K to $50K 12- 7-17 Free and Clear 9- 8-18
65-74 10- 5-12 MHP: 5 to < 10 13- 7-11 Aggregate 10- 7-17
Aggregate 10- 7-17 Aggregate 10- 7-17 S35K to S50K 12- 7-17
Free and Clear 9- 8-18 Res: Family PK 11- 7-16 Res: Senior PK 9- 7-16
MHP: 10 < 15 9-11-18 Paying Mortgage 11- 7-12 MHP: 15 to < 25 9- 6-16
Res: Senior PK 9- 7-16 Res: 15 to < 25 8- 6-19 Res: Family PK 11- 7-16
MHP: 15 to < 25 9- 6-16 MHP: 25+ Years 6- 6-21 75-84 11-10-15
No. In HH: One 8-11-20 MHP: 15 to < 25 9- 6-16 S15K to S25K 6- 8-15
Res: 15 to < 25 8- 6-19 $25K to $35K 3- 5-19 No. In HH: Two 11- 4-14
Women 8- 9-19 65-74 10- 5-12 Men 12- 4-13
Res: 25+ Years 6- 8-21 No. In HH: Two 11- 4-14 45-54 19- 3-13
MHP: 25+ Years 6- 6-21 No. In HH: 3+ 10- 4-12 Paying Mortgage 11- 7-12
Kids in HH 6- 3-18 Men 12- 4-13 No. In HH: 3+ 10- 4-12
18-44 6- 3-11 *MHP: < 5 Years 11- 4-25 65-74 10- 5-12
S15K to $25K 6- 8-15 * Res: < 5 Years 10- 3-21 18-44 6- 3-11
Less Than $15K 6-11-20 45-54 19- 3-13 S50K or More 18- 0-11
Res: 10 to < 15 5- 8-19 Kids in HH 6- 3-18 MHP: 5 to < 10 13- 7-11
S25K to $35K 3- 5-19 18-44 6- 3-11 Res: 5 to < 10 15- 8-10
85+ 0- 7-37 S50K or More 18- 0-11 55-64 12-12-10
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 38
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 33: Rent, Own Free and Clear or Mortgage Residence
And a few questions for statistical purposes. . .
Do you own yor residence free and clear, are you paying a mortgage, or are
you renting?
1. Free and Clear 70 3. Renting 2
2. Paying Mortgage 27 4. Refused 2
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
Free and Clear **- 0- 0- 0 Paying Mortgage 0-**- 0- 0 Kids in HH 21-71- 6- 3 S25K to S35K 68-24- 3- 5
MHP: 25+ Years 93- 4- 4- 0 Kids in HH 21-71- 6- 3 18-44 23-69- 6- 3 No. In HH: 3+ 27-65- 4- 4
Res: 25+ Years 92- 5- 3- 0 18-44 23-69- 6- 3 85+ 90- 2- 5- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 80-14- 2- 4
85+ 90- 2- 5- 2 S50K or More 32-66- 2- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 27-65- 4- 4 Less Than $15K 85- 9- 2- 4
75-84 88-10- 2- 1 No. In HH: 3+ 27-65- 4- 4 *MHP: < 5 Years 46-50- 4- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 38-55- 3- 3
Res: 15 to,< 25 87- 9- 2- 3 45-54 35-65- 0- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 93- 4- 4- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 68-27- 2- 3
Less Than S15K 85- 9- 2- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 38-55- 3- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 38-55- 3- 3 MHP: 10 < 15 67-29- 2- 3
No. In HH: One 82-15- 2- 1 $35K to S50K 45-55- 0- 0 Res: 25+ Years 92- 5- 3- 0 Kids in HH 21-71- 6- 3
S15K to S25K 81-17- 0- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 46-50- 4- 0 Men 66-29- 3- 3 18-44 23-69- 6- 3
MHP: 15 to < 25 80-14- 2- 4 MHP: 5 to < 10 52-47- 1- 0 S25K to $35K 68-24- 3- 5 Men 66-29- 3- 3
65-74 78-20- 1- 1 Res: 5 to < 10 52-47- 2- 0 Res: Senior PK 77-20- 2- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 87- 9- 2- 3
Res: Senior PK 77-20- 2- 1 55-64 56-42- 0- 2 $50K or More 32-66- 2- 0 85+ 90- 2- 5- 2
Women 72-25- 2- 1 Res: Family PK 58-39- 1- 2 No. In HH: One 82-15- 2- 1 Res: Family PK 58-39- 1- 2
No. In HH: Two 70-27- 1- 1 MHP: 10 < 15 67-29- 2- 3 Aggregate 70-27- 2- 2 55-64 56-42- 0- 2
Aggregate 70-27- 2- 2 Men 66-29- 3- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 80-14- 2- 4 $15K to S25K 81-17- 0- 2
Res: 10 to < 15 68-27- 2- 3 No. In HH: Two 70-27- 1- 1 Less Than S15K 85- 9- 2- 4 Aggregate 70-27- 2- 2
S25K to E35K 68-24- 3- 5 Res: 10 to < 15 68-27- 2- 3 75-84 88-10- 2- 1 No. in HH: Two 70-27- 1- 1
MHP: 10 < 15 67-29- 2- 3 Aggregate 70-27- 2- 2 Res: 15 to < 25 87- 9- 2- 3 65-74 78-20- 1- 1
Men 66-29- 3- 3 Women 72-25- 2- 1 Res: 10 to < 15 68-27- 2- 3 75-84- 88-10- 2- 1
Res: Family PK 58-39- 1- 2 S25K to $35K 68-24- 3- 5 Women 72-25- 2- 1 Women 72-25- 2- 1
55-64 56-42- 0- 2 Res: Senior PK 77-20- 2- 1 Res: 5 to < 10 52-47- 2- 0 Res: Senior PK 77-20- 2- 1
Res: 5 to < 10 52-47- 2- 0 65-74 78-20- 1- 1 MHP: 10 < 15 67-29- 2- 3 No. In HH: One 82-15- 2- 1
MHP: 5 to < 10 52-47- 1- 0 S15K to $25K 81-17- 0- 2 Res: Family PK 58-39- 1- 2 Paying Mortgage 0-**- 0- 0
*MHP: < 5 Years 46-50- 4- 0 No. In HH: One 82-15- 2- 1 No. In HH: Two 70-27- 1- 1 MHP: 25+ Years 93- 4- 4- 0
S35K to S50K 45-55- 0- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 80-14- 2- 4 65-74 .. 78-20- 1- 1 Res: 5 to < 10 52-47-; 2- 0
* Res: < 5 Years 38-55- 3- 3 75-84 88-10- 2- 1 MHP: 5 to < 10 52-47- 1- 0 45-54 . 35-65- 0- 0
45-54 35-65- 0- 0 Less Than $15K 85- 9- 2- 4 55-64 56-42- 0- 2 Free and Clear **- 0- 0- 0
S50K or More 32-66- 2- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 87- 9- 2- 3 Paying Mortgage 0-**- 0- 0 Res: 25+ Years 92- 5- 3- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 27-65- 4- 4 Res: 25+ Years 92- 5- 3- 0 $15K to $25K 81-17- 0- 2 *MHP: < 5 Years 46-50- 4- 0
18-44 23-69- 6- 3 MHP: 25+ Years 93- 4- 4- 0 45-54 35-65- 0- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 52-47- 1- 0
Kids in HH 21-71- 6- 3 85+ 90- 2- 5- 2 S35K to $50K 45-55- 0- 0 $35K to $50K 45-55- 0- 0
Paying Mortgage 0-**- 0- 0 Free and Clear **- 0- 0- 0 Free and Clear **- 0- 0- 0 $50K or More 32-66- 2- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 39
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 34: How Easy Or Difficult Was Financing Your Home
When you financed your home, how easy or difficult was it to find financing
very easy, somewhat easy, somewhat difficult or very difficult?
1. Very Easy 54 4. Very Difficult 4
2. Somewhat Easy 26 5. No Opinion 2
3. Somewhat Difficult 14
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
85+ **- 0- 0- 0 65-74 48-38- 5- 5 Res: 10 to < 15 53-18-29- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 60-20-10-10
Less Than S15K 80-20- 0- 0 S25K to $35K 56-33-11- 0 18-44 38-25-29- 8 18-44 38-25-29- 8
75-84 73- 9-18- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 67-33- 0- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 53-21-26- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 60-20-13- 7
*MHP: < 5 Years 71-21- 7- 0 Res: 25+ Years 67-33- 0- 0 S35K to $50K 43-22-26- 4 No. In HH: 3+ 38-31-22- 6
* Res: < 5 Years 69-25- 6- 0 55-64 55-32-14- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 38-31-22- 6 Women 50-23-17- 6
MHP: 25+ Years 67-33- 0- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 46-31-13- 6 Kids in HH 42-29-21- 4 MHP: 5 to < 10 46-31-13- 6
$15K to $25K 67-22-11- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 38-31-22- 6 Res: Family PK 46-27-19- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 48-30-13- 5
No. In HH: One 67-15-11- 4 Men 60-31-10- 0 75-84 73- 9-18- 0 65-74 48-38- 5- 5
Res: 25+ Years 67-33- 0- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 48-30-13- 5 $50K or More 55-24-17- 3 $35K to S50K 43-22-26- 4
45-54 65-25-10- 0 No. In HH: Two 57-30-11- 2 Women 50-23-17- 6 Kids in HH 42-29-21- 4
MHP: 15 to < 25 60-20-13- 7 Kids in HH 42-29-21- 4 Paying Mortgage 54-26-14- 4 Res: Fami.ly PK 46-27-19- 4
Res: 15 to < 25 60-20-10-10 Res: Senior PK 60-27-10- 4 Aggregate 54-26-14- 4 Res: Senior PK 60-27-10- 4
Res: Senior PK 60-27-10- 4 Res: Family PK 46-27-19- 4 55-64 55-32-14- 0 Paying Mortgage 54-26-14- 4
Men 60-31-10- 0 Paying Mortgage 54-26-14- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 48-30-13- 5 Aggregate 54-26-14- 4
No. In HH: Two 57-30-11- 2 Aggregate 54-26-14- 4 MHP: 15 to < 25 60-20-13- 7 No. In HH: One 67-15-11- 4
S25K to S35K 56-33-11- 0 45-54 65-25-10- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 46-31-13- 6 $50K or More 55-24-17- 3
S50K or More 55-24-17- 3 18-44 38-25-29- 8 No. In HH: One 67-15-11- 4 No. In HH: Two 57-30-11- 2
55-64 55-32-14- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 69-25- 6- 0 S15K to $25K 67-22-11- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 53-18-29- 0
Aggregate 54-26-14- 4 $50K or More 55-24-17- 3 $25K to $35K 56-33-11- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 69-25- 6- 0
Paying Mortgage 54-26-14- 4 Women 50-23-17- 6 No. In HH: Two 57-30-11- 2 Res: 25+ Years 67-33- 0- 0
Res: 10 to < 15 53-18-29- 0 $15K to S25K 67-22-11- 0 45-54 65-25-10- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-21- 7- C
MHP: 10 < 15 53-21-26- 0 $35K to S50K 43-22-26- 4 Res: 15 to < 25 60-20-10-10 Men 60-31-10- 0
Women 50-23-17- 6 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-21- 7- 0 Res: Senior PK 60-27-10- 4 45-54 65-25-10- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 48-30-13- 5 MHP: 10 < 15 53-21-26- 0 Men 60-31-10- 0 55-64 55-32-14- 0
65-74 48-38- 5- 5 Less Than $15K 80-20- 0- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 71-21- 7- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 67-33= 0- 0
MHP: 5 to < 10 46-31-13- 6 MHP: 15 to < 25 60-20-13- 7 * Res: < 5 Years 69-25- 6- 0 75-84 73- 9-18- 0
Res: Family PK 46-27-19- 4 Res: 15 to < 25 60-20-10-10 65-74 48-38- 5- 5 85+ **- 0- 0- 0
$35K to $50K 43-22-26- 4 Res: 10 to < 15 53-18-29- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 67-33- 0- 0 Less Than $15K 80-20- 0- 0
Kids in HH 42-29-21- 4 No. In HH: One 67-15-11- 4 Res: 25+ Years 67-33- 0- 0 $15K to $25K 67-22-11- 0
18-44 38-25-29- 8 75-84 73- 9-18- 0 85+ **- 0- 0- 0 $25K to S35K 56-33-11- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 38-31-22- 6 85+ **- 0- 0- 0 Less Than $15K 80-20- 0- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 53-21-26- 0
Free and Clear 0- 0- 0- 0 Free and Clear 0- 0- 0- 0 Free and Clear 0- 0- 0- 0 Free and Clear 0- 0- 0- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 40
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 34: How Easy Or Difficult was Financing Your Home
When you financed your home, how easy or difficult was it to find financing
very easy, somewhat easy, somewhat difficult or very difficult?
1. Very Easy 54 4. Very Difficult 4
2. Somewhat Easy 26 5. No Opinion 2
3. Somewhat Difficult 14
Format 1+2/3+4/5 MC 1
Rank 1+2, 3+4, 5
Less Than $15K **- 0- 0 18-44 63-38- 0 65-74 86-10- 5
85+ **- 0- 0 $35K to $50K 65-30- 4 S35K to S50K 65-30- 4
MHP: 25+ Years **- 0- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 71-29- 0 Kids in HH 71-25- 4
Res: 25+ Years **- 0- 0 No. In HH: 3+ 69-28- 3 Res: Family PK 73-23- 4
* Res: < 5 Years 94- 6- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 74-26- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 78-19- 4
*MHP: < 5 Years 93- 7- 0 Kids in HH 71-25- 4 No. In HH: One 81-15- 4
Men 90-10- 0 Women 73-23- 3 Res: 5 to < 10 78-18- 3
45-54 90-10- 0 Res: Family PK 73-23- 4 No. In HH: 3+ 69-28- 3
S25K to $35K 89-11- 0 $50K or More 79-21- 0 Women 73-23- 3
$15K to S25K 89-11- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 80-20- 0 Paying Mortgage 80-18- 2
No. In HH: Two 87-13- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 80-20- 0 Aggregate 80-18- 2
Res: Senior PK 87-13- 0 MHP: 5 to < 10 78-19- 4 Men 90-10- 0
55-64 86-14- 0 Res: 5 to < 10 78-18- 3 Res: 25+ Years **- 0- 0
65-74 86-10- 5 75-84 82-18- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 93- 7- 0
75-84 82-18- 0 Paying Mortgage 80-18- 2 Free and Clear 0- 0- 0
No. In HH: One 81-15- 4 Aggregate 80-18- 2 * Res: < 5 Years 94- 6- 0
Aggregate 80-18- 2 No. In HH: One 81-15- 4 MHP: 15 to < 25 80-20- 0
Paying Mortgage 80-18- 2 55-64 86-14- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 71-29- 0
Res: 15 to < 25 80-20- 0 Res: Senior PK 87-13- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 80-20- 0
MHP: 15 to < 25 80-20- 0 No. In HH: Two 87-13- 0 No. In HH: Two 87-13- 0
S50K or More 79-21- 0 S15K to S25K 89-11- 0 Res: Senior PK 87-13- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 78-18- 3 S25K to $35K 89-11- 0 18-44 63-38- 0
MHP: 5 to < 10 78-19- 4 45-54 90-10- 0 45-54 90-10- 0
MHP: 10 < 15 74-26- 0 Men 90-10- 0 55-64 86-14- 0
Women 73-23- 3 65-74 86-10- 5 MHP: 25+ Years **- 0- 0 "
Res: Family PK 73-23- 4 *MHP: < 5 Years 93- 7- 0 75-84 82-18- 0
Kids in HH 71-25- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 94- 6- 0 85+ **- 0- 0
Res: 10 to < 15 71-29- 0 MHP: 25+ Years **- 0- 0 Less Than S15K **- 0- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 69-28- 3 Res: 25+ Years **- 0- 0 S15K to $25K 89-11- 0
S35K to $50K 65-30- 4 85+ **- 0- 0 S25K to S35K 89-11- 0
18-44 63-38- 0 Less Than S15K **- 0- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 74-26- 0
Free and Clear 0- 0- 0 Free and Clear 0- 0- 0 S50K or More 79-21- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 41
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 35: Found Refinancing in Last Five Years
Have you tried to refinance your home, say, within the last five years or
so? And were you able to find refinancing or not?
1. Yes / Yes, Could Find 6 4. No 76
2. Yes / No, Could Not Find 17 5. No Opinion 0
3. Yes / No Opinion 1
Format 1/2/3/4 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3, 4
S15K to S25K 22-11- 0-67 45-54 5-35- 0-60 Res: 15 to < 25 10-20-10-60 75-84 0- 0- 0-**
65-74 19-14- 0-67 MHP: 15 to < 25 7-27- 7-60 MHP: 15 to < 25 7-27- 7-60 85+ 0- 0- 0-**
No. In HH: One 15-15- 0-70 No. In HH: 3+ 0-25- 0-75 S35K to S50K 4-22- 4-70 MHP: 25+ Years 0- 0- 0-**
E25K to S35K 11-11- 0-78 Kids in HH 0-25- 0-75 18-44 0-21- 4-75 Res: 25+ Years 0- 0- 0-**
Res: 15 to < 25 10-20-10-60 Res: 10 to < 15 6-24- 0-71 No. In HH: Two 4-13- 2-81 55-64 5- 5- 0-91
Res: Senior PK 10-12- 0-79 Res: Family PK 2-23- 2-73 Res: Family PK 2-23- 2-73 *MHP: < 5 Years 0-14- 0-86
Men 10-12- 0-79 $35K to S50K 4-22- 4-70 Women 3-20- 2-75 MHP: 10 < 15 5-11- 0-84
MHP: 5 to < 10 7-19- 0-74 18-44 0-21- 4-75 Paying Mortgage 6-17- 1-76 S50K or More 0-17- 0-83
MHP: 15 to < 25 7-27- 7-60 Women 3-20- 2-75 Aggregate 6-17- 1-76 * Res: < 5 Years 0-19- 0-81
Res: 5 to < 10 7-15- 0-78 Res: 15 to < 25 10-20-10-60 Kids in HH 0-25- 0-75 No. In HH: Two 4-13- 2-81
Res: 10 to < 15 6-24- 0-71 Less Than $15K 0-20- 0-80 Res: 5 to < 10 7-15- 0-78 Less Than.S15K 0-20- 0-80
Paying Mortgage 6-17- 1-76 * Res: < 5 Years 0-19- 0-81 Res: 10 to < 15 6-24- 0-71 Res: Senior PK 10-12- 0-79
Aggregate 6-17- 1-76 MHP: 5 to < 10 7-19- 0-74 Res: Senior PK 10-12- 0-79 Men 10-12- 0-79
MHP: 10 < 15 5-11- 0-84 S50K or More 0-17- 0-83 *MHP: < 5 Years 0-14- 0-86 Res: 5 to < 10 7-15- 0-78
45-54 5-35- 0-60 Paying Mortgage 6-17- 1-76 MHP: 5 to < 10 7-19- 0-74 $25K to $35K 11-11- 0-78
55-64 5- 5- 0-91 Aggregate 6-17- 1-76 * Res: < 5 Years 0-19- 0-81 Aggregate 6-17- 1-76
$35K to S50K 4-22- 4-70 Res: 5 to < 10 7-15- 0-78 Free and Clear 0- 0- 0- 0 Paying Mortgage 6-17- 1-76
No. In HH: Two 4-13- 2-81 No. In HH: One 15-15- 0-70 MHP: 25+ Years 0- 0- 0-** Women 3-20- 2-75
Women 3-20- 2-75 65-74 19-14- 0-67 No. In HH: One 15-15- 0-70 18-44 0-21- 4-75
Res: family PK 2-23- 2-73 *MHP: < 5 Years 0-14- 0-86 Res: 25+ Years 0- 0- 0-** Kids in HH 0-25- 0-75
Kids in HH 0-25- 0-75 No. In HH: Two 4-13- 2-81 No. In HH: 3+ 0-25- 0-75 No. In HH: 3+ 0-25- 0-75
18-44 0-21- 4-75 Men 10-12- 0-79 Men 10-12- 0-79 MHP: 5 to < 10 7-19- 0-74
Res: 25+ Years 0- 0- 0-** Res: Senior PK 10-12- 0-79 45-54 5-35- 0-60 Res: Family PK 2-23- 2-73
No. In HH: 3+ 0-25- 0-75 $25K to $35K 11-11- 0-78 55-64 5- 5- 0-91 Res: 10 to < 15 6-24- 0-71
MHP: 25+ Years 0- 0- 0-** $15K to $25K 22-11- 0-67 65-74 19-14- 0-67 No. In HH: one 15-15Y 0-70
75-84 0- 0- 0-** MHP: 10 < 15 5-11- 0-84 75-84 0- 0- 0-** $35K to S50K 4-22- 4-70
Free and Clear 0- 0- 0- 0 55-64 5- 5- 0-91 85+ 0- 0- 0-** 65-74 19-14- 0-67
Less Than $15K 0-20- 0-80 MHP: 25+ Years 0- 0- 0-** Less Than S15K 0-20- 0-80 S15K to $25K 22-11- 0-67
*MHP: < 5 Years 0-14- 0-86 75-84 0- 0- 0-** $15K to $25K 22-11- 0-67 Res: 15 to < 25 10-20-10-60
85+ 0- 0- 0-** 85+ 0- 0- 0-** $25K to S35K 11-11- 0-78 45-54 5-35- 0-60
* Res: < 5 Years 0-19- 0-81 Res: 25+ Years 0- 0- 0-** MHP: 10 < 15 5-11- 0-84 MHP: 15 to < 25 7-27- 7-60
S50K or More 0-17- 0-83 Free and Clear 0- 0- 0- 0 S50K or More 0-17- 0-83 Free and Clear 0- 0- 0- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 42
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 36: Primary or Secondary Residence
Is this home your primary or secondary residence?
1. Primary 98 3. Refused 1
2. Secondary 1
Format 1/2/3 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3
S35K to S50K **- 0- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 93- 7- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 90- 7- 3
45-54 **- 0- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 90- 7- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 97- 0- 3
Res: 5 to < 10 **- 0- 0 55-64 96- 4- 0 S25K to S35K 97- 0- 3
18-44 **- 0- 0 Res: 25+ Years 95- 3- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 96- 2- 2
S15K to $25K **- 0- 0 Res: Family PK 96- 3- 1 75-84 98- 0- 2
Less Than S15K **- 0- 0 Kids in HH 97- 3- 0 Res: 25+ Years 95- 3- 2
MHP: 5 to < 10 **- 0- 0 85+ 98- 2- 0 Women 98- 1- 1
Res: Senior PK 99- 0- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 98- 2- 0 Paying Mortgage 98- 1- 1
Res: 15 to < 25 99- 0- 1 S50K or More 98- 2- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 99- 0- 1
No. In HH: One 99- 1- 1 No. In HH: 3+ 96- 2- 2 Aggregate 98- 1- 1
Men 99- 1- 0 65-74 98- 2- 0 Res: Family PK 96- 3- 1
MHP: 10 < 15 98- 2- 0 No. In HH: Two 98- 2- 1 No. In HH: Two 98- 2- 1
Res: 10 to < 15 98- 2- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 98- 2- 0 No. In HH: One 99- 1- 1
Free and Clear 98- 1- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 98- 2- 0 Res: Senior PK 99- 0- 0
75-84 98- 0- 2 Free and Clear 98- 1- 0 Free and Clear 98- 1- 0
Paying Mortgage 98- 1- 1 Men 99- 1- 0 MHP: 10 < 15 98- 2- 0
65-74 98- 2- 0 Aggregate 98- 1- 1 Men 99- 1- 0
Aggregate 98- 1- 1 Women 98- 1- 1 MHP: 25+ Years 98- 2- 0
S50K or More 98- 2- 0 Paying Mortgage 98- 1- 1 Kids in HH 97- 3- 0
No. In HH: Two 98- 2- 1 No. In HH: One 99- 1- 1 Res: 5 to < 10 **- 0- 0
Women 98- 1- 1 Res: Senior PK 99- 0- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 93- 7- 0
MHP: 25+ Years 98- 2- 0 18-44 **- 0- 0 18-44 **- 0- 0
85+ 98- 2- 0 45-54 **- 0- 0 45-54 **- 0- 0
$25K to $35K 97- 0- 3 MHP: 5 to < 10 **- 0- 0 55-64 96- 4- 0
MHP: 15 to < 25 97- 0- 3 Res: 5 to < 10 **- 0- 0 65-74 98- 2- 0
Kids in HH 97- 3- 0 75-84 98- 0- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 98- 2- 0
Res: Family PK 96- 3- 1 Res: 15 to < 25 99- 0- 1 85+ 98- 2- 0
55-64 96- 4- 0 Less Than S15K **- 0- 0 Less Than S15K **- 0- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 96- 2- 2 $15K to S25K **- 0- 0 S15K to S25K **- 0- 0
Res: 25+ Years 95- 3- 2 S25K to S35K 97- 0- 3 MHP: 5 to < 10 **- 0- 0
*MHP: < 5 Years 93- 7- 0 $35K to S50K **- 0- 0 S35K to S50K **- 0- 0
* Res: < 5 Years 90- 7- 3 MHP: 15 to < 25 97- 0- 3 S50K or More 98- 2- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 43
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 37: Prefer to Live in Family or Senior Park
If you had your preference, would you rather live in a family park or a
enior park?
1. Family Park 19 3. No Opinion 6
2. Senior Park 76
Format 1/2/3 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3
Kids in HH 91- 6- 3 Res: Senior PK 6-91- 4 65-74 10-81-10
18-44 77-20- 3 75-84 8-90- 2 Res: Family PK 44-47- 9
No. In HH: 3+ 65-31- 4 Less Than $15K 6-89- 6 MHP: 10 < 15 15-77- 8
Res: family PK 44-47- 9 Res: 25+ Years 11-83- 6 Men 22-70- 7
$35K to SSOK 43-52- 5 85+ 10-83- 7 85+ 10-83- 7
S50K or More 36-57- 7 No. In HH: One 11-82- 7 $50K or More 36-57- 7
Paying Mortgage 36-62- 2 MHP: 25+ Years 12-82- 6 No. In HH: One 11-82- 7
45-54 35-61- 3 Free and Clear 12-81- 6 Res: 10 to < 15 15-79- 6
MHP: 5 to < 10 28-66- 6 No. In HH: Two 14-81- 5 Free and Clear 12-81- 6
Res: 5 to < 10 28-66- 6 $15K to S25K 15-81- 4 Res: 5 to < 10 28-66- 6
S25K to $35K 27-68- 5 65-74 10-81-10 MHP: 5 to < 10 28-66- 6
*MHP: < 5 Years 25-75- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 15-80- 5 Res: 25+ Years 11-83- 6
* Res: < 5 Years 24-76- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 16-79- 5 MHP: 25+ Years 12-82- 6
Men 22-70- 7 Res: 10 to < 15 15-79- 6 Less Than $15K 6-89- 6
55-64 21-75- 4 Women 17-79- 4 Aggregate 19-76- 6
Aggregate 19-76- 6 MHP: 10 < 15 15-77- 8 $25K to S35K 27-68- 5
Women 17-79- 4 * Res: < 5 Years 24-76- 0 Res: 15 to < 25 15-80- 5
MHP: 15 to < 25 16-79- 5 Aggregate 19-76- 6 $35K to $50K 43-52- 5
MHP: 10 < 15 15-77- 8 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-75- 0 MHP: 15 to < 25 16-79- 5
S15K to $25K 15-81- 4 55-64 21-75- 4 No. In HH: Two 14-81- 5
Res: 15 to < 25 15-80- 5 Men 22-70- 7 Women 17-79- 4
Res: 10 to < 15 15-79- 6 $25K to $35K 27-68- 5 No. In HH: 3+ 65-31- 4
No. In HH: Two 14-81- 5 Res: 5 to < 10 28-66- 6 55-64 21-75- 4
Free and Clear 12-81- 6 MHP: 5 to < 10 28-66- 6 $15K to $25K 15-81- 4
MHP: 25+ Years 12-82- 6 Paying Mortgage 36-62- 2 Res: Senior PK 6-91- 4
No. In HH: One 11-82- 7 45-54 35-61- 3 45-54 35-61- 3
Res: 25+ Years 11-83- 6 S50K or More 36-57- 7 Kids in HH 91- 6- 3
85+ 10-83- 7 $35K to $50K 43-52- 5 18-44 77-20- 3
65-74 10-81-10 Res: Family PK 44-47- 9 Paying Mortgage 36-62- 2
75-84 8-90- 2 No. In HH: 3+ 65-31- 4 75-84 8-90- 2
Res: Senior PK 6-91- 4 18-44 77-20- 3 * Res: < 5 Years 24-76- 0
Less Than $15K 6-89- 6 Kids in HH 91- 6- 3 *MHP: < 5 Years 25-75- 0
Lawrence Research CROSSTABS Page 44
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Q. 38: Member of a Mobile Home Owners Association
Are you presently a member of a mobile home owners association?
1. Yes 47 3. Refused 2
2. No 51
Format 1/2/3 MC 1
Rank 1, 2, 3
75-84 59-39- 2 18-44 26-74- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 54-39- 7
Res: 25+ Years 58-42- 0 S50K or More 39-61- 0 * Res: < 5 Years 41-52- 7
MHP: 25+ Years 56-43- 1 No. In HH: 3+ 35-61- 4 No. In HH: 3+ 35-61- 4
*MHP: < 5 Years 54-39- 7 Res: 5 to < 10 38-60- 2 S25K to $35K 49-49- 3
Res: 15 to < 25 52-46- 2 Kids in HH 41-59- 0 85+ 46-51- 2
Free and Clear 51-48- 1 MHP: 5 to < 10 39-59- 2 Women 47-51- 2
No. In HH: One 50-48- 2 55-64 42-58- 0 Res: Senior PK 47-50- 2
Res: 10 to < 15 50-48- 2 Paying Mortgage 42-57- 1 65-74 46-52- 2
MHP: 15 to < 25 50-50- 1 45-54 45-55- 0 Less Than S15K 48-50- 2
$15K to $25K 49-51- 0 $35K to S50K 45-55- 0 75-84 59-39- 2
$25K to S35K 49-49- 3 MHP: 10 < 15 44-55- 2 Res: 15 to < 25 52-46- 2
No. In HH: Two 49-50- 1 65-74 46-52- 2 MHP: 5 to < 10 39-59- 2
Less Than S15K 48-50- 2 * Res: < 5 Years 41-52- 7 Aggregate 47-51- 2
Res: Family PK 48-51- 1 Men 48-52- 1 No. In HH: One 50-48- 2
Men 48-52- 1 85+ 46-51- 2 Res: 10 to < 15 50-48- 2
Res: Senior PK 47-50- 2 Res: Family PK 48-51- 1 Res: 5 to < 10 38-60- 2
Aggregate 47-51- 2 Aggregate 47-51- 2 MHP: 10 < 15 44-55- 2
Women 47-51- 2 $15K to $25K 49-51- 0 Free and Clear 51-48- 1
85+ 46-51- 2 Women 47-51- 2 MHP: 25+ Years 56-43- 1
65-74 46-52- 2 No. In HH: Two 49-50- 1 No. In HH: Two 49-50- 1
$35K to S50K 45-55- 0 Res: Senior PK 47-50- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 50-50- 1
45-54 45-55- 0 Less Than $15K 48-50- 2 Paying Mortgage 42-57- 1
MHP: 10 < 15 44-55- 2 MHP: 15 to < 25 50-50- 1 Res: Family PK 48-51- 1
Paying Mortgage 42-57- 1 $25K to $35K 49-49- 3 Men 48-52- 1
55-64 42-58- 0 Res: 10 to < 15 50-48- 2 18-44 26-74- 0
* Res: < 5 Years 41-52- 7 No. In HH: One 50-48- 2 Kids in HH 41-59- 0
Kids in HH 41-59- 0 Free and Clear 51-48- 1 55-64 42-58- 0
MHP: 5 to < 10 39-59- 2 Res: 15 to < 25 52-46- 2 Res: 25+ Years 58-42- 0
S50K or More 39-61- 0 MHP: 25+ Years 56-43- 1 $15K to $25K 49-51- 0
Res: 5 to < 10 38-60- 2 Res: 25+ Years 58-42- 0 45-54 45-55- 0
No. In HH: 3+ 35-61- 4 75-84 59-39- 2 $35K to S50K 45-55- 0
18-44 26-74- 0 *MHP: < 5 Years 54-39- 7 S50K or More 39-61- 0
LAWRENCE
MESEARCH
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
Verbatim Summary
Survey No: 6674
Huntington Beach MHP Residents
Q. 4 First of all,what are some of the things you like most about mobile home
park living?(N=400)
Categories Frequency Percent Total Sample Percent Eligible
Location 33 8.3% 8.3%
Convenient 19 4.8% 4.8%
Nice Neighbors/People 145 36.3% 36.3%
Community Atmosphere 10 2.5% 2.5%
Small Community 11 2.8% 2.8%
No Upkeep 49 12.3% 12.3%
Maintenance 13 3.3% 3.3%
Clean 7 1.8% 1.8%
Private/Secluded 30 7.5% 7.5%
Quiet 34 8.5% 8.5%
Safe 96 24.0% 24.0%
o +
Affordable/Low Rent 26 6.5% 6.5 /°
Management 6 1.5% 1.5%
Amenities/Services 81 20.3% 20.3%
Quality of Home 8 2.0% 2.0%
Inside Space 8 2.0% 2.0%
Outside Space 8 2.0% 2.0%
Home Ownership 8 2.0%
For Seniors 7 1.8% 1.8%
For Families 1 0.3% 0.3%
General Positive 19 4.8% 4.8%
Don't Know/No Opinion 18 4.5% 4.5%
0
Misc. 5 1.3% o
LAWR E N C E Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Summ
MESEARCH Page: 2
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
Q. 5 And what are some of the things you like least about mobile home park living'
(N=400)
Categories Frequency Percent Total Sample Percent Eligible
Management/Owners 22 5.5
0
Rules 30 7.5% 7.5%
Maintenance 9 2.3% 2.3%
Parking 8 2.0% 2.0%
Facilities/Amenities 3 0.8% • o
0
0
Crime/Safety 5 1.3% 1.3 0
0
New Developments 7 1.8% 1.8 0
Rent/Expense 95 23.8% 23.8%
Land Ownership 15 3.8% 3.80 0
Home Ownership 1 0.3%
0
0
Home Values 3 0.8% 0.8 /o
Condition/Quality of Home 11 2.8% 2.8%
Inside Space 7 1.8% 1.80 0
Lack of Storage 3 0.8% 0.8%
No Garages 12 3.0% 3•
0
0
Outside Space 33 8.3% 8.3 0
Neighbors/People 21 5.3
0
Lack of Privacy 3 0.8% 0.8%
0
Noisy 7 1.8% 1.8 0
Children Allowed 16 4.0% _
0
o
No Children Allowed 1 0.3% 0.3 /o
0
Pets Allowed 5 1.3% 1.3 /o
No Pets Allowed 3 0.8% 0. 0 o
0
Elderly 2 0.5% 0. o
People Dying 2 0.5% 0.50 0
General Negative 4 1.0% 1.0%
General Positive 124 31.0% 31.00 0
Don't Know/No Opinion 12 3.0% 3.0%
Misc.
8 2.0% 2.0%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Summary
(RESEARCH Page: 3
PU8UC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
Q. 22 What partiality or preferences do you feel are being given in your park?
(N=82)
Categories Frequency Percent Total Sample Percent Eligible
Management/Owners 5 1.3% 6.1 %
Rent/Lease Terms 11 2.8% 13.40 0
Rules 10 2.5% °
0
Parking 4 1.0% 4.9%
Repair/Upkeep 4 1.0% 4.9%
0
Communication 2 0.5% 2.4 /o
Families 2 0.5% - °
0
Seniors 2 0.5% 2.4%
Non-Seniors 2 0.5% 2.4%
Pets 3 0.8% °
0
0
Racial Prejudice 2 0.5% 2.4 /o
0
General Negative 5 1.3% °
0
General Positive 2 0.5% .4 /o
0
None/Nothing 14 3.5% . °
Don't Know/No Opinion 20 5.0% 24.4%
0
Misc. 2 0.5% .4 0
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Summary
ARESEARCH Page: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
Q. 24 And what are the main reasons for your preference for a month-to-month
lease?(N=70)
Categories Frequency Percent Total Sample Percent Eligible
0
Flexibility 21 5.3% 30.0 /o
Don't Like Leases 11 2.8% 1
0
Things Change 7 1.8
0
Elderly 2 0.5% • o
0
0
Cheaper 2 0.5% 2.9 0
0
Rent Control 4 1.0% 5.7 /o
Easier 5 1.3% • o
0
If Need To Sell 2 0.5% 2.9%
It's All They Offer 4 1.0
0
0
General Positive 6 1.5% 8.6 0
0
General Negative 1 0.3% 1.4 /o
No Reasons 2 0.5% 2.9%
Dont'Know/No Opinion 3 0.8% 4.3%
Misc. 3 0.8% 4.3%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Summary
ARES EARC H Page: 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS a MARKETING
Q. 25 And what are the main reasons for your preference for this type of lease?
(N=230)
Categories Frequency Percent Total Sample Percent Eligible
Security/Stability 40 10.0% 17.4%
Steady Rent 7 1.8% 3.0%
One Year Long Enough 24 6.0% 10.4%
No Increase Worries 46 11.5% 20.0%
Planning Ahead 7 1.8% 3.00 0
No Plans To Leave 7 1.8% 3.0%
Easier/Less Trouble 12 3.0% 5.2%
Time To Negotiate Terms 7 1.8% • °
0
Flexible 7 1.8% 3.0%
In Case Of Selling 4 1.0% 1.7%
Things Change 6 1.5% 2.6%
Rules Change 2 0.5% 0.9%
Age/Elderly 5 1.3% 2.2%
More Fair 5 1.3% 2• °
0
d
Cost Of Living 1 0,3% 0. 0 o
0
Park Conditions 1 0.3% 0.4 /o _
General Positive 23 5.8% 10.0%
Don't Know/No Opinion 18 4.5% 7.8%
0
Misc. 16 4,0% o
r
LAWRENCE
✓RESEARCH
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Verbatims
Survey:6674
Huntington Beach MHP
Residents
The following pages contain all of the answers to the open-ended questions as
follows:
First of all, what are some of the things you like most about
mobile home park living? (N=400)
And what are some of the things you like least about mobile
home park living? (N=400)
You said that park maintenance and repairs are very
unacceptable to you. Would you elaborate on that? Any
examples? (N=16)
You said that the resolution of problems is very unacceptable to
you. Would you elaborate on that? Any examples? (N=24)
What partiality or preferences do you feel are being given in your
park? (N=82)
And what are the main reasons for your preference for a month-
to-month lease? (N=70)
And what are the main reasons for your preference for this type
of lease? (N=230)
The answers are sorted according to key words and phrases. Following the verbatim
report is a summary tabulation of the responses. The last section contains crosstab
reports that tabulate each demographic characteristic to each category within each
question. The following tag codes identify which demographic characteristics were
included:
Mrtg = Mortgage Status
Park = Park Type
Sex = Sex
Age = Age
Inc = Income
LAWRENCE Page 2
ARESEARCH
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
Descriptor: Age
Abbreviation Choice Text
18-44 = 18-44
45-54 = 45-54
55-64 = 55-64
65-74 = 65-74
75-84 = 75-84
85+ = 85+
Descriptor: Income
Abbreviation Choice Text
<$15K = Less Than$15,000
$15-25K = $15,000 to $25,000
$25-35K = $25,000 to$35,000
$35-50K = $35,000 to$50,000
$50K+ _ $50,000 or More
Descriptor: Mortgage Status
Abbreviation Choice Text
Own = Free and Clear _
Paying = Paying Mortgage
Descriptor: Park Type
Abbreviation Choice Text
Family = Family Park
Senior = Senior Park
LAWRENCE Page 3
c(RESEARCH
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
Descriptor: Sex
Abbreviation Choice Text
Male = Male
Female = Female
d
LAWRENCE
''RESEARCH
PUBUC AFFAIRS• MARKETING Cross Tabulations
Survey No:6674
Huntington Beach MHP Residents
Q.4 First of all,what are some of the things you like most about mobile home park
living? (N=400)
Sex & Age
Categories
Male Female 18-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+_
Location 10% 8% 7% 6% 22%
Convenient 5% 4% 6% 5%
Nice Neighbors/People 34% 38% 40% 35% 27% 67%
Community Atmosphere 5% 1 % 4% 6%
Small Community 3% 3% 3% 4%
I Upkeep 15% 11 % 7% 18% 10%
Aaintenance 5% 2% 3% 4%
Clean 1 % 2% 1 % 2% 6%
Private/Secluded 8% 7% 7% 11 %
Quiet 7% 9% 6% 11 % 8%
Safe 22% 25% 27% 23% 20%
Affordable/Low Rent 6% 7% 4% 8% 10% 33%
Management 2% 3% 1 %
Amenities/Services 15% 23% 18% 22% 22%
Quality of Home 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% _
Inside. Space 2% 2% 2% 3%
Outside Space 1 % 3% 2% 2% 2%
Home Ownership 1 % 3% 3% 1 %
For Seniors 2% 2% 1 % 4%
For Families 0% 1 %
General Positive 6% 4% 5% 4% 6%
Don't Know/No Opinion 6% 4% 6% 4% 2%
Misc. 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 4%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Cross Tabulations
ARESEARCH Page 2
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
0.5 And what are some of the things you like least about mobile home park living?
(N=400)
Sex & Age
Categories
Male Female 18-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+
Management/Owners 5% 6% 2% 6% 16%
Rules 6% 8% 3% 9% 16% 33%
Maintenance 2% 2% 3% 2%
Parking 3% 2% 2% 1 % 4%
Facilities/Amenities 1 % 1 % 6 %
Crime/Safety 1 % 2% 2% 1 % 2%
New Developments 1 % 2% 2% 1 % 4%
Rent/Expense 22% 25% 27% 23% 18%
Land Ownership 4% 4% 5% 4% 2%
Home Ownership 0% 1 %
;ome Values 1 % 0% 1 % 2%
Condition/Quality of Home 5% 1 % 1 % 4% 4%
Inside Space 3% 1 % 1 % 2% 4%
Lack of Storage 2% 1 % 1 %
No Garages 3% 3% 1 % 5% 4%
Outside Space 7% 9% 7% 7% 18%
Neighbors/People 5% 5% 4% 5% 10%
Lack of Privacy 1 % 1 % 2%
Noisy 2% 2% 1 % 2% 6%
Children Allowed 2% 5% 4% 5%
No Children Allowed 0% 1 %
Pets Allowed 2% 1 % 2%
No Pets Allowed 1 % 1 % 1 %
Elderly 1 % 0% 1 % 2%
People Dying 1 % 1 % 1 %
General Negative 1 % 1 % 2%
General Positive 28% 33% 39% 28% 12% 33%
Don't Know/No Opinion 1 % 4% 4% 2% 33%
Misc. 1 % 3% 2% 2% 2%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents ICross Tabulations
gESEARCH Page
JSUC AFFAIRS• MARKETING
Q-22 What partiality or preferences do you feel are being given in your park?
(N=82)
Sex & Age
Categories
Male Female 18-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+
Management/Owners 11 % 4% 7% 17%
Rent/Lease Terms 11 % 15% 11 % 21 % 6%
Rules 14% 11 % 7% 6% 33%
Parking 7% 4% 6% 11 %
Repair/Upkeep 4% 6% 6% 6% 50%
Communication 4% 2% 6%
Families 4% 2% 4% 3%
Seniors 4% 11 %
Non-Seniors 4% 2% 6%
its 4% 4% 3% 11 %
racial Prejudice 4 % 4% 3%
General Negative 11 % 4% 7% 3% 11 %
General Positive 4% 2% 6% y
None/Nothing 21 % 15% 36% 12%
Don't Know/No Opinion 18% 28% 29% 26% 11 % 50%
Misc. 4% 3% 6%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Cross Tabulations
cfRESEARCH Page 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
0.24 And what are the main reasons for your preference for a month-to-month
lease? (N=70)
Sex & Age
Categories
Male Female 18-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+
Flexibility 37% 26% 33% 22% 57%
Don't Like Leases 11 % 19% 7% 22% 14%
Things Change 4 % 14% 7% 14%
Elderly 5% 7%
Cheaper 4% 2% 6%
Rent Control 11 % 2% 11 %
Easier 11 % 5% 19 %
If Need To Sell 4% 2% 4% 14%
It's All They Offer 4% 7% 7% 6%
General Positive 7% 9% 7% 11 %
3eneral Negative 2% 3%
No Reasons 5 % 3% 14%
Dont'Know 1 No Opinion 4% 5% 7% 3%
Misc. 7% 2% 4 % 6%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Cross Tabulations
°RESEARCH Page 5
JBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
Q.25 And what are the main reasons for your preference for this type of lease?
(N=230)
Sex & Age
Categories
Male Female 18-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+
Security/Stability 19% 17% 16% 20% 9% 50%
Steady Rent 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 50%
One Year Long Enough 11 % 10% 13% 10% 3%
No Increase Worries 19% 21 % 21 % 19% 22%
Planning Ahead 3% 3% 3% 4%
No Plans To Leave 2% 4% 2% 4% 3%
Easier/Less Trouble 9% 2% 4% 4% 13%
Time To Negotiate Terms 5% 2% 5% 2%
Flexible 3% 3% 5% 6%
Case Of Selling 1 % 2% 1 % 9%
hings Change 1 % 4% 2% 4%
Rules Change 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 %
Age/Elderly 3% 2% 3% 2%
More Fair 4% 1 % 5%
Cost Of Living 1 % 1 %
Park Conditions 1 % 1 %
General Positive 6% 13% 14% 9% 3%
Don't Know/No Opinion 5% 10% 4% 9% 16%
MISC. 8% 6% 10% 3% 13%
LAWRENCE
'RESEARCH
rU81IC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Cross Tabulations
Survey No:6674
Huntington Beach MHP Residents
Q.4 First of all,what are some of the things you like most about mobile home park
living? (N=400)
Mortgage Status & Park Type
Categories
Own Paying Family Senior
Location 6% 14% 21 % 1 %
Convenient 5% 3% 4% 5%
Nice Neighbors/People 40% 26% 30% 39%
Community Atmosphere 3% 3% 4% 2%
Small Community 3% 3% 3% 2%
I Upkeep 12% 13% 11 % 13%
.4aintenance 2% 6% 3% 4%
Clean 1 % 3% 1 % 2%
Private/Secluded 9 % 6% 5% 9% w
Quiet 7% 14% 7% 9%
Safe 24% 26% 17% 28%
Affordable/Low Rent 4% 12% 12% 4%
Management 1 % 2% 1 % 2%
Amenities/Services 20% 19% 12% 24%
Quality of Home 2% 3% 3% 2%
Inside, Space 3% 1 % 1 % 2%
Outside Space 3% 1 % 3% 2%
Home Ownership 2% 3% 1 % 3%
For Seniors 3% 1 % 2%
For Families 1 % 1 %
General Positive 4% 8% 4% 5%
Don't Know/No Opinion 5% 2% 6% 4%
Misc. 1 % 1 % 1 %
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Cross Tabulations
ARESEARCH Page 2
PUSUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
0.5 And what are some of the things you like least about mobile home park living?
(N=400)
Mortgage Status & Park Type
Categories
Own Paying Family Senior
Management/Owners 4% 9% 11 % 3%
Rules 6% 11 % 9% 7%
Maintenance 3% 1 % 3% 2%
Parking 3% 1 % 4% 0%
Facilities/Amenities 0% 1 % 2%
Crime/Safety 1 % 2% 4%
New Developments 2% 1 % 4% 0%
Rent/Expense 24% 24% 27% 22%
Land Ownership 4% 3% 2% 5%
Home Ownership 0% 0%
come Values 0% 2 % 1 % 1 %
Condition/Quality of Home 3% 2% 2% 3%
Inside Space 1 % 4 % 1 % 2%
Lack of Storage 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 %
No Garages 4% 2% 2% 4%
Outside Space 7 % 13% 14% 5%
Neighbors/People 6% 3% 4% 6%
Lack of Privacy 0% 2% 1 % 1 %
Noisy 1 % 4% 3% 0%
Children Allowed 4% 4% 11 %
No Children Allowed 0% 0%
Pets Allowed 1 % 1 % 2% 0%
No Pets Allowed 1 % 1 %
Elderly 1 % 1 % 0%
People Dying 1 % 1 %
General Negative 0% 3% 1 % 1 %
General Positive 34% 21 % 15% 39%
Don't Know/No Opinion 3% 4% 3% 3%
Misc. 2% 3% 2% 2%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents JCrossTabulations
-//RESEARCH Page 3
JBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
Q.22 What partiality or preferences do you feel are being given in your park?
(N=82)
Mortgage Status & Park Type
Categories
Own Paying Family Senior
Management/Owners 6% 7% 8% 5%
Rent/Lease Terms 15% 11 % 19% 7%
Rules 10% 18% 19% 7%
Parking 2% 11 % 6% 5%
Repair/Upkeep 8% 3% 7%
Communication 2% 4% 6%
Families 4% 6%
Seniors 7% 6%
Non-Seniors 2% 4% 5%
lets 2% 7% 7%
<acial Prejudice 4% 5%
General Negative 2% 4% 8% 5%
General Positive 2% 4% 3% 2%
None/Nothing 17% 14% 6% 24%
Don't Know/No Opinion 29% 21 % 14% 33%
Msc_ 2% 4% 6%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Cross Tabulations
ARESEARCH Page 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
0.24 And what are the main reasons for your preference for a month-to-month
lease? (N=70)
Mortgage Status & Park Type
Categories
Own Paying Family Senior
Flexibility 27% 38% 32% 30%
Don't Like Leases 16% 19% 12% 18%
Things Change 11 % 10% 8% 11 %
Elderly 5% 4% 2%
Cheaper 2% 5% 5%
Rent Control 5% 5% 8% 5%
Easier 9% 8% 7%
If Need To Sell 2% 5% 4% 2%
It's All They Offer 5% 5% 4% 7%
General Positive 9% 10% 8% 9%
3eneral Negative 2% 2%
No Reasons 2% 5% 4% 2%
Dont'Know/No Opinion 5 % 5% 4% 5%
r
Misc. 5% 4% 2%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents ICross Tabulations
ARESEARCH Page 5
J13UC AFFAIRS• MARKETING
Q.25 And what are the main reasons for your preference for this type of lease?
(N=230)
Mortgage Status & Park Type
Categories
Own Paying Family Senior
Security/Stability '17% 17% 19% 16%
Steady Rent 3% 4% 2% 3%
One Year Long Enough 11 % 8% 7% 13%
No Increase Worries 19% 24% 20% 20%
Planning Ahead 4% 1 % 2% 3%
No Plans To Leave 3% 4% 1 % 4%
Easier/Less Trouble 3% 8% 8% 3%
Time To Negotiate Terms 2% 6% 1 % 4%
Flexible 3% 1 % 5% 2%
i Case Of Selling 1 % 4% 4% 1 %
hings Change 3% 3% 1 % 3%
Rules Change 1 % 1 %
Age/Elderly 3% 4% 1 %
More Fair 3% 3%
Cost Of Living 1 % 1 %
Park Conditions 1 % 1 %
General Positive 13% 4% 6% 12%
Don't Know/No Opinion 5% 14% 10% 6%
Misc. 9% 3% 7% 7%
LAWRENCE
WRESEARCH
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Cross Tabulations
Survey No:6674
Huntington Beach MHP Residents
Q.4 First of all,what are some of the things you like most about mobile home park
living? (N=400)
Income
Categories
<$15K $15-25K $25-35K $35-50K $50K+
Location 20% 16% 8% 6% 6%
Convenient 6% 10% 3% 5%
Nice Neighbors/People 11 % 32% 33% 34% 45%
Community Atmosphere 6 % 6% 4% 1 % 1 %
Small Community 3% 3% 2% 3% 4%
No Upkeep 6% 26% 15% 14% 8%
Jlaintenance 3% 6% 4% 2% 4%
Clean 3% 3% 4% 1 % 2%
Private/Secluded 3% 6% 8% 10% 9%
d
Quiet 9% 10% 17% 7% 8%
Safe 23% 19% 31 % 30% 21 %
Affordable/Low Rent 14% 16% 12% 2% 5%
Management 6% 2% 1 %
Amenities/Services 29% 13% 19% 18% 19%
Quality of Home 3% 3% 2% 2%
Inside Space 6% 2% 2% 1 %
Outside Space 3% 3% 2% 2% 3%
Home Ownership 6% 2% 2% 2%
For Seniors 4% 3%
For Families 2%
General Positive 3% 3% 4% 9% 4%
Don't Know/No Opinion 6% 4% 8%
Misc. 2% 2%
_.LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents ICross Tabulations
-nRESEARCH Page 2
USUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
Q.5 And what are some of the things you like least about mobile home park living?
(N=400)
Income
Categories
<$15K $15-25K $25-35K $35-50K $50K+
Management/Owners 9% 16% 4% 6% 4%
Rules 9% 23% 8% 11 % 4%
Maintenance 6% 4%
Parking 6% 3% 2% 3%
Facilities/Amenities 9%
Crime/Safety 3% 2% 2%
New Developments 3% 3% 3%
Rent/Expense 23% 10% 23% 26% 30%
Land Ownership 9% 4% 4% 4%
'-tome Ownership 2%
tome Values 3% 2% 1 %
Condition/Quality of Home 3% 6% 3% 4%
.Inside Space 3% 4% 2% 1 %
Lack of Storage 3%
No Garages 6% 4% 4% 3%
Outside Space 26% 16% 8% 7% 4%
Neighbors/People 3% 6% 12% 5% 5%
Lack of Privacy 6% 1 %
Noisy 9% 3% 2% 2%
Children Allowed 3% 6% 4%No Children Allowed 1 %
Pets Allowed 2% 2% 1 %
No Pets Allowed 2% 1 %
Elderly 3%
People Dying 1 % 1 %
General Negative 2% 2%
General Positive 6% 19% 25% 28% 33%
Don't Know/No Opinion 3% 6% 4% 3%
Misc. 3% 6% 1 % 1 %
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Cross Tabulations
c✓(RESEARCH Page 3
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING
Q.22 What partiality or preferences do you feel are being given in your park?
(N=82)
Income
Categories
<$15K $15-25K $25-35K $35-50K $50K+
Management/Owners 18% 7% 5%
Rent/Lease Terms 27% 21 % 21 %
Rules 18% 27% 14% 9% 7%
Parking 9% 14% 5%
Repair/Upkeep 7% 14%
Communication 7% 7%
Families 9% 7%
Seniors 9% 9%
Non-Seniors 9%
Pets 14% 5%
facial Prejudice 7% 5%
General Negative 18% 5% 7%
General Positive 9 % 7%
None/Nothing 18% 14% 23% 21 %
Don't Know/No Opinion 9% 9% 7% 36% 36%
Misc. 9% 9%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Cross Tabulations
,✓ARESEARCH Page 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS• MARKETING
Q.24 And what are the main reasons for your preference for a month-to-month
lease?(N=70)
Income
Categories
<$15K $15-25K $25-35K $35-50K $50K+
Flexibility 50% 42% 44% 18%
Don't Like Leases 33% 17% 31 % 9%
Things Change 13% 17% 6% 14%
Elderly 9%
Cheaper 8% 5%
Rent Control 8% 14%
Easier 6% 9%
If Need To Sell 13% 5%
It's All They Offer 33% 8% 6% 5%
General Positive 6% 14%
General Negative 6%
No Reasons 25%
Dont' Know/No Opinion 8%
d
Misc. 33% 8%
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Cross Tabulations
eIRESEARCH Page 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS-MARKETING
Q.25 And what are the main reasons for your preference for this type of lease?
(N=230)
Income
Categories
<$15K $15-25K $25-35K $35-50K $50K+
Security/Stability 14% 18% 19% 20% 15%
Steady Rent 5% 6% 3%
One Year Long Enough 5% 9% 10% 12% 15%
No Increase Worries 27% 23% 19% 17% 23%
Planning Ahead 5% 3% 5% 2%
No Plans To Leave 9% 3% 6%
Easier/Less Trouble 9 % 9% 6% 8% 2%
Time To Negotiate Terms 6% 5% 2%
Flexible 5% 3% 5% 2%
In Case Of Selling 9% 5%
rhings Change 5% 3% 2% 5%
Rules Change 3%
Age/Elderly 3%
r
More Fair 2% 5%
Cost Of Living 2%
Park Conditions 5%
General Positive 5% 3% 12% 15%
Don't Know/No Opinion 9% 18% 10% 10% 2%
Misc. 14% 10% 3% 5%
' AWRENCE
RESEARCH
PUBUC AFMO•MARKETING
Verbatim Responses
Survey No 6674
Huntington Beach MHP Residents
Q.4 First of all,what are some of the things you like most about mobile home park
living? (N=400)
Category: Location
The neighbors are friendly/It feels like a family/I live one block from the highway and the beach.
No upkeep/Everything is done for you/Good location.
I live across the street from the ocean.
Friendly neighbors/Good location.
No yard work/Friendly neighbors/Great view.
The beach is close.
Across from the beach.
Location.
Affordable/Close to the beach/No walls/Community services.
Close to the beach.
It's well kept/Can handle the yard/Good location/Close to stores/The beach makes the property
value rise while the rent stays the same.
Location.
Neighbors/Location.
No yard work/Close to the ocean/Most people are friendly.
Live near ocean/No air pollution.
It's across the street from the beach.
The location neighbors.
Close to the beach.
It fit into my whole lifestyle including the location and my income.
Near the beach/Good air.
Beach is across the street.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
o
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 2
Category: Location
Being close to the beach/Neighbors are great.
Like the area we live/Can afford it here.
Location/Nice neighbors/Close to the beach/Price.
Ability to go away and not worry about maintenance/Location.
Location.
like it/Across the street from the ocean.
That I don't have to share walls/The location.
Safety/Especially when were not here/No pets or kids/Well located.
By beach/No gardening/Community within a community/Friendly people as neighbors.
Bigger home for the money/Leave for lengths of time and know its safe/Good location.
Neighbors/Beach.
Location.
Category: Convenient
Convenient/Self-contained unit/I like that it's small/Easier to maintain. v
It's well kept/Can handle the yard/Good location/Close to stores/The beach makes the property
value rise while the rent stays the same.
Good summer home/Close to my husband's work/Close to neighbors.
Close to shopping areas/Friendly people.
It's close to everything/People. _
A was convenient.
Simple/One floor/Convenient/Safe/Quiet.
Close to everything/Close to freeway/Secure.
Easy to take care of the property/You get to know the people better than you would otherwise/
Very convenient/Enjoy living here.
No yard work/Facilities/Conveniences/Little community.
It's convenient to get to work/Quiet/Not a lot of maintenance.
Pool/Stationary bicycle/Good breakfasts/Not far from shopping.
Neighbors/Closeness to town.
AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
IESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 3
Category: Convenient
Companionship/The fun/People/Friends/Conveniences of the shopping,stores,and library.
don't have to maintain the yard or home/Easy shopping/One level/Clean.
It's convenient/It's a structured area/People watch out for each other/I like the people too.
Its convenient/Everything is compact.
Everything is very convenient/Yard kept up and bills in a monthly rate.
I like the convenience and there's a lot of livable space.
Category. Nice NeighborsJPeople
Everyone minds their own business.
The neighbors are friendly/It feels like a family/I live one block from the highway and the beach.
Its friendly and a small community.
Friendly neighbors/Good location.
No yard work/Friendly neighbors/Great view.
Safety/Good neighbors.
Easy care/Close neighbors.
Community atmosphere/Everyone is friendly/Everyone watches out for the others.
People/How things are handled in the park.
The neighbors are friendly and close by.
Know everyone/Safety/Quiet/All ages.
Happy people. —
Uttle city of its own/Nice neighbors/Quiet atmosphere.
Neighbors/Community spirit.
Closeness with neighbors.
Close to shopping areas/Friendly people.
People/Activities.
You get to know your neighbors.
Neighbors/Amenities.
There's a lot to do in this park/Friendly neighbors.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 4
Category-. Nice Neighbors/People
Its close to everything/People.
Friendly neighbors.
1 have my own place/Neighbors.
Safe/Clubhouse with pool/You can meet people your own age.
Neighbors/Location.
No yard work/Close to the ocean/Most people are friendly.
I don't have the yard work/Nice people/I like the activities.
People/Security.
Friendly neighbors.
Neighbors.
Quiet/Friendly people/Swimming pool.
Close neighbors/Security.
Comfortable/Interaction with the neighbors.
Quiet/Good neighbors.
Good neighbors.
Nice group of people/Security. g
Friendly/Community activity/People looking out for each other.
Good neighbors.
Make friends easier/Nicer than an apartment.
We have our own home/We an fix it the way we want to/It's better than apartments/Good
neighbors/Good entertainment. —
'It's like a country club/You get to know the people/Swimming pool.
More activities/Take care of the land/People are willing to help.
Its like one big family/We all watch out for each other/We go places together.
Close neighbors.
Not a lot of yard work/Neighbors watch our home/Close to our neighbors.
A lot of friends/Safer.
You get to know a lot of people.
The location neighbors.
AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 5
Category: Nice Neighbors/People
It is a close community of people.
The upkeep/The managers keep it really neat and clean/I also like closeness of neighbors/We
have a good relationship with the managers/It's quiet/I like having a swimming pool.
Everyone knows each other.
Same privacy as a home and yet people around.
The friendships.
It's like a family/Everybody looks after one another its a quiet place/Its more secure.
feel more secure,friendly people.
It is quiet,and people are nice.
The people who live here/The activities and the way it's laid out.
Wonderful neighbors/Neighbors look out for one another.
The companionship and the closeness/The activities are nice/It's good for single women who have
lost their husbands/It gives them a social life/We have fun.
Like the neighbors/Quiet/A lot of activities.
I'm with a group of retired people with common interests who go on vacations together/We don't
have to depend on our children to look out for us and to entertain us.
The close proximity of friends/Easy maintenance.
People are friendly.
The association with people.
Feels like one big family/The security.
People that I can depend on.
Close to neighbors/I feel secure.
People/Friendship/Social clubs/Very pleasant/Exercising/Quiet/Secure.
Like the club house/Social activities/Nice people.
All the activities that we have for our entertainment and the advantage of good neighbors.
Friendly people/Neighbors will watch your house if you go on vacation or leave for a while so you
don't have to worry about it/Low upkeep also.
The people/Security/Activities.
Maintenance is cut down/Close neighbors/Lots of activities.
Group activities that we have and the socializing with each other/Neighbors are good to look in on
you and make sure you are all right.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 6
Category: Nice Neighbors/People
Friends.
Very limited yard work/The neighbors are friendly/You get to know a lot more people.
People I have met and the fun we have/The entertainment and dinners are great.
Easy to take care of the property/You get to know the people better than you would otherwise/
Very convenient/Enjoy living here.
Being close to the beach/Neighbors are great.
People are friendly/Safety.
Safety of the park/People are all the same age/We just have a good time.
The camaraderie.
Friendly people/A lot of facilities that most parks don't.
Friendship from all the people living here/Good facilities/ excellent entertainment.
Safe/Friendships.
Neighborliness/Everybody's pretty much in the same boat.
Condition of park/Neighbors.
Some very good friends/Fun.
Location/Nice neighbors/Close to the beach/Price.
Feel protected/Friendly.
Everybody knows and helps each other.
Seems like a little village in a city/Easy to clean/Lots of friendly people.
Privacy/There isn't a lot of outside work and upkeep/Neighborliness/Safety/Very nice for
entertaining, I like the way they use every bit of space.
Big family feeling/A lot of friends.
Feeling of protection,you have people watching over you and that makes me feel good.
Companionship/Many activities.
Security/Friendships.
People are very friendly and helpful/Managers are great/Feel very safe here.
Very comfortable/Nice people.
Companionship I have with the neighbors.
Comfortable/Nice neighbors.
More companionship.
AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 7
Category: Nice Neighbors/People
Neighbors/Closeness to town.
Companionship/The fun/People/Friends/Conveniences of the shopping,stores,and library.
All the people that are around.
Close neighbors/Social life/Utilities aren't too high.
Everyone is very friendly/They help each other out it's just like a little community.
Security/Help from neighbors/Less traffic.
Security/Neighbors.
The people are nice/They have good entertainment/I like having people close by.
Neighbors.
Neighborhood/Activities/People look out for each other/Great clubhouse.
First moved there enjoyed friends.
like being all to myself/I have lots of nice neighbors.
I.think probably its the feeling/There's not a lot of outside work/You can close it up and go away/
People seem to take care of one another/I just like it/I've enjoyed it.
It's convenient/Its a structured area/People watch out for each other/I like the people too.
The opportunities of companionship and activites.
Since I've been widowed there have been friends/pRotection/Privacy.
It's more like a family/We're a senior park and so we have people that are our own age/The rules
are made for people like us.
This is a senior park and we have a good friendship with neighbors.
By beach/No gardening/Community within a community/Friendly people as neighbors.
Closeness of the neighbors/Lots of social activities/Fairly safe place.
The people are really nice/We have a beautiful park/We have a lot of fun.
I'ts friendly and if you want a job,your job's in your own compound/It has its own pool.
Neighbors/Beach.
The neighbors are great.
It is very friendly and a lot of activities.
People care about each other.
Its safe/Neighbors watch your place/No problem with vandalism.
It's safe like having a large family.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 8
Category: Nice Neighbors✓People
Everybody's friendly.
Feel safe/A lot of friends here.
Closeness/Friendliness neighbor/Pool/Club house/Parties/Bus trips.
When I moved here the park was new and everyone was about the same age and we all
participated in programs.
Don't have to worry when on vacation/Neighbors look after each other.
Like my neighbors/Club house.
People who are very nice,caring, and congenial.
Close community/Neighbors/Interaction/Pool/Club/Socials.
Like my neighbors.
Knowing neighbors/Entertainment/Recreation/Security.
Closeness of the people/You have your own little community and things going on and
entertainment.
The people here and the environment/It's a safe place.
Everybody is very friendly.
I like the people in general.
d
Neighbors look after each other.
Category: Community Atmosphere
Community atmosphere/Everyone is friendly/Everyone watches out for the others.
Neighbors/Community spirit.
Community atmosphere/Amenities.
Sense of community.
Like a community.
Sense of community/Easy lifestyle/Easy maintenance/Lots of activities.
By beach/No gardening/Community within a community/Friendly people as neighbors.
Beautiful home and nice community.
Community atmosphere/Safety for kids can play and not be in the real streets so to speak.
The people here and the environment/Its a safe place.
AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents verbatim Responses
IESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 9
Category: Small Community
It's friendly and a small community.
Small community.
Small.
Little city of its own/Nice neighbors/Quiet atmosphere.
Small community/Pool.
Like having my own 4 walls compared to an apartment/Managers here make me feel safe/Content
with small home and yard.
A nice little community.
No yard work/Facilities/Conveniences/Little community.
Seems like a little village in a city/Easy to clean/Lots of friendly people.
Everyone is very friendly/They help each other out it's just like a little community.
Closeness of the people/You have your own little community and things going on and
entertainment.
Category: No Upkeep
No upkeep/Everything is done for you/Good location.
Twice as much living space/No yard work.
No yard work/Friendly neighbors/Great view.
Easy care/Close neighbors.
Not having to mow the lawn.
It's well kept/Can handle the yard/Good location/Close to stores/The beach makes the property
-value rise while the rent stays the same.
Easy maintenance.
No yard work/Close to the ocean/Most people are friendly.
I don't have the yard work/Nice people/I like the activities.
Low maintenance/No yard work.
Space/Little upkeep.
No maintenance/Good activities.
Easy care/Cost/Security/Fenced backyard.
QAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 10
Category: No Upkeep
No yard work.
Lower maintenance on the yard.
More activities/Take care of the land/People are willing to help.
Not a lot of yard work/Neighbors watch our home/Close to our neighbors.
The upkeep/The managers keep it really neat and clean/I also like closeness of neighbors/We
have a good relationship with the managers/It's quiet/I like having a swimming pool.
No yard work,and the feeling of security.
The close proximity of friends/Easy maintenance.
Low maintenance.
Friendly people/Neighbors will watch your house if you go on vacation or leave for a while so you
don't have to worry about it/Low upkeep also.
You can take off when you want and go on vacation/You don't have to worry about a yard.
Maintenance is cut down/Close neighbors/Lots of activities.
Very limited yard work/The neighbors are friendly/You get to know a lot more people.
An easy way of life/No big yard to take care of.
Easy to take care of the property/You get to know the people better than you would otherwise/
Very convenient/Enjoy living here.
No yard work/Facilities/Conveniences/Little community.
Upkeep/Privacy.
Lack of upkeep.
Not too much maintenance.
Lack of upkeep on the outside.
Easy to take care of.
Sense of community/Easy lifestyle/Easy maintenance/Lots of activities.
Seems like a little village in a city/Easy to clean/Lots of friendly people.
Privacy/There isn't a lot of outside work and upkeep/Neighborliness/Safety/Very nice for
entertaining, I like the way they use every bit of space.
Lack of responsibility for yard maintenance.
No maintenance.
Upkeep/Privacy/Compact.
Having a house without any care.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
IESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 11
Category: No Upkeep
Less yard work/Safer.
don't have to maintain the yard or home/Easy shopping/One level/Clean.
Maintenance is easier/Safer/Expense/Cozier.
Your own home/Not much maintenance/Yards and pool are kept up neatly.
I think probably its the feeling/There's not a lot of outside work/You can close it up and go away/
People seem to take care of one another/I just like it/I've enjoyed it.
By beach/No gardening/Community within a community/Friendly people as neighbors.
No yard.
No yard work.
No outside maintenance/No amenities/You don't have to worry about your house when you leave.
Category: Maintenance
Quiet/Good maintenance/Clubhouse/Fun activities/Pool area is clean/Game rooms.
Convenient/Self-contained unit/I like that it's small/Easier to maintain.
It's well kept/Can handle the yard/Good location[Close to stores/The beach makes the property
value rise while the rent stays the same.
Quiet/Clean/No bothering children/Kept up.
The upkeep/The managers keep it really neat and clean/I also like closeness of neighbors/We
have a good relationship with the managers/It's quiet/I like having a swimming pool.
They keep it up clean nice and activities for people.
It's convenient to get to work/Quiet/Not a lot of maintenance. —
Condition of park/Neighbors.
Ability to go away and not worry about maintenance/Location.
Your own home/Not much maintenance/Yards and pool are kept up neatly.
Park maintenance is kept up by management.
Everything is very convenient/Yard kept up and bills in a monthly rate.
A gated community/Well maintained/I have a very large space.
Verbatim R
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents esponses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 12
Category. Clean
Quiet/Clean.
Quiet/Clean.
Quiet/Clean/No bothering children/Kept up.
Activities for the elderly/Clean.
They keep it up clean nice and activities for people.
Nice clean parks/Lots of entertainment.
Very quiet/Beautiful park/Enough room between each mobile.
Category. Private/Secluded
Privacy/Inexpensive.
Privacy.
Privacy.
Safe/Private/No close neighbors.
It's a very secluded part of city/No solicitors/Quiet/Activities all the time/Pool/Sauna.
Privacy.
Same privacy as a home and yet people around.
Very private.
It's quiet and private.
Nobody bothers you.
Very Independent,secluded,and safe. _
The privacy/No children/No animals/Everything we want.
Price/Privacy/Amenities.
Upkeep/Privacy.
Privacy.
Quiet/Somewhat secluded/Not a lot of traffic.
Privacy.
Privacy/There isn't a lot of outside work and upkeep/Neighborliness/Safety/Very nice for
entertaining, I like the way they use every bit of space.
It is gated and we have privacy.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
I E S EAR C H Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 13
Category: Private/Secluded
People mind their own business.
Upkeep/Privacy/Compact.
Privacy.
That I don't have to share walls/The location.
Since I've been widowed there have been friends/pRotection/Privacy.
Like the seclusion of the park.
Surrounded by own fence/Have enough privacy.
The privacy and the comfort.
My own home/I have privacy when I want it/Not a big yard.
It's very private/There are not a lot of people bugging you.
Privacy.
,ategory: Quiet
Safe/Quiet/Inexpensive.
Quiet. y
Quiet.
Quiet 1 Clean.
Quiet/Good maintenance/Clubhouse/Fun activities/Pool area is clean/Game rooms.
Know everyone/Safety/Quiet/All ages.
Quiet —
Little city of its own/Nice neighbors/Quiet atmosphere.
Quiet/Clean.
Quiet.
It's a very secluded part of city/No solicitors/Quiet/Activities all the time/Pool/Sauna.
Quiet/Lots of activities.
Quiet/Friendly people/Swimming pool.
Quiet/Good neighbors.
Quiet.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 14
Category. Quief
Quiet/Clean/No bothering children/Kept up.
The upkeep/The managers keep it really neat and clean/I also like closeness of neighbors/We
have a good relationship with the managers/It's quiet/I like having a swimming pool.
It's like a family/Everybody looks after one another its a quiet place/Its more secure.
It is quiet,and people are nice.
Its quiet and private.
Like the neighbors/Quiet/A lot of activities.
It is quiet and you have land that you can do things with.
People/Friendship/Social clubs/Very pleasant/Exercising/Quiet/Secure.
Peace and quiet/Security.
Very quiet and relaxing.
Simple/One floor/Convenient/Safe/Quiet.
It's convenient to get to work/Quiet/Not a lot of maintenance.
Quiet/Age group is same.
Very quiet/Beautiful park/Enough room between each mobile.
Quiet/Somewhat secluded/Not a lot of traffic.
Quiet
Quiet.
Better than an apartment, it's quiet.
This park is nice/Quiet neighborhood.
Category. Safe
1 feel safe living alone.
Safety/Good neighbors.
Safe/Quiet/Inexpensive.
Know everyone/Safety/Quiet/All ages.
Security/Well-run management.
I feel very safe here.
Safe/Private/No close neighbors.
' AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
.RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 15
Category: Safe
Security.
Safe/Clubhouse with pool/You can meet people your own age.
People/Security.
Security.
The neighbor watches my house when I am gone.
Close neighbors/Security.
Security/Neighbors watch out for you and your home/Lots of activities.
Easy care/Cost/Security/Fenced backyard.
Safety/No strangers or thieves/Safe feeling of the environment.
Nice group of people/Security.
Friendly/Community activity/People looking out for each other.
Good security.
Good security.
Not a lot of yard work/Neighbors watch our home/Close to our neighbors.
A lot of friends/Safer.
Y
More secure/Activities.
Feel more secure here.
It is nice and safe and I like that.
People watch out for you.
Its like a family/Everybody looks after one another its a quiet place/Its more secure.
feel more secure,friendly people.
Safe.
Wonderful neighbors/Neighbors look out for one another.
I feel safe and secure.
Safety factor.
Very Independent,secluded,and safe.
Feel safer in a park.
No yard work,and the feeling of security.
Feels like one big family/The security.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
AUBUC AFFAMS•MARKEANG Page: 16
Category: Safe
Feel safer.
Security/Compatibility.
T is a very secure area.
Close to neighbors/I feel secure.
People/Friendship/Social clubs/Very pleasant/Exercising/Quiet/Secure.
Peace and quiet/Security.
Like having my own 4 walls compared to an apartment/Managers here make me feel safe/Content
with small home and yard.
Friendly people/Neighbors will watch your house if you go on vacation or leave for a while so you
don't have to worry about it/Low upkeep also.
The people/Security/Activities.
Security/Like the home.
Simple/One floor/Convenient/Safe/Quiet.
Close to everything/Close to freeway/Secure.
People are friendly/Safety.
Safety of the park/People are all the same age/We just have a good time.
Safe/Friendships.
Security.
Feeling very safe here.
Safe.
Security/All kinds of activities. _
;Feel protected/Friendly.
Security/ good facilities.
Safe place for kids.
Privacy/There isn't a lot of outside work and upkeep/Neighborliness/Safety/Very nice for
entertaining, I like the way they use every bit of space.
Safe place.
Security.
It is gated and we have privacy.
Feeling of protection,you have people watching over you and that makes me feel good.
' AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 17
Category: Safe
Security/Somewhat affordable.
Security/Friendships.
People are very friendly and helpful/Managers are great/Feel very safe here.
Security/Help from neighbors/Less traffic.
Less yard work/Safer.
Security/Neighbors.
Maintenance is easier/Safer/Expense/Cozier.
Security.
I think probably its the feeling/There's not a lot of outside work/You can close it up and go away/
People seem to take care of one another/I just like it/I've enjoyed it.
Secure community/Like the way homes are manufactured.
Its convenient/It's a structured area/People watch out for each other/I like the people too.
Safety/Especially when were not here/No pets or kids/Well located.
Since I've been widowed there have been friends/pRotection/Privacy.
Secure area because of the gate.
Safety.
Closeness of the neighbors/Lots of social activities/Fairly safe place.
Bigger home for the money/Leave for lengths of time and know it's safe/Good location.
We like the mobile home because of the safety.
Security.
It's safe/Neighbors watch your place/No problem with vandalism.We live in one that has security,and a locked gate,I like the club house.
It's safe like having a large family.
It's nice to feel safe and be able to walk in the evening.
Feel safe/A lot of friends here.
More secure here/I don't have to worry about my house if I go on vacation.
Don't have to worry when on vacation/Neighbors look after each other.
Security.
Community atmosphere/Safety for kids can play and not be in the real streets so to speak.
�AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
Pu9uc AFFAJRs•MARKETING Page: 18
Category: Safe
Knowing neighbors/Entertainment/Recreation/Security.
No outside maintenance/No amenities/You don't have to worry about your house when you leave.
The people here and the environment/It's a safe place.
The feeling of safety.
A gated community/Well maintained/I have a very large space.
Category. Affordable/Low Rent
Privacy/Inexpensive.
Safe/Quiet/Inexpensive.
The price is affordable.
Affordable/Close to the beach/No walls/Community services.
Cheap.
Better than an apartment/Cheaper than houses.
Easy care/Cost/Security/Fenced backyard.
Affordable.
Cheap rent.
Its affordable.
I like living alone and it's economical.
It fit into my whole lifestyle including the location and my income.
It is one that I can afford. —
Affordable.
Rent is low,almost like living in a home.
Not paying property taxes/Not a large investment.
Price/Privacy/Amenities.
Inexpensive.
Low rent.
Like the area we live/Can afford it here.
Location/Nice neighbors/Close to the beach/Price.
AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I verbatim Responses
-1 E S EARC H Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 19
Category: Affordable/Low Rent
Get nice home without a large property tax.
No big mortgage.
Security/Somewhat affordable.
Close neighbors/Social life/Utilities aren't too high.
Maintenance is easier/Safer/Expense/Cozier.
Category: Management
People/How things are handled in the park.
Security/Well-run management.
The upkeep/The managers keep it really neat and clean/I also like closeness of neighbors/We
have a good relationship with the managers/It's quiet/I like having a swimming pool.
like having my own 4 walls compared to an apartment/Managers here make me feel safe/Content
with small home and yard.
Availability/Activities/Owners are nice.
People are very friendly and helpful/Managers are great/Feel very safe here.
Category. Amenities/Services
Quiet/Good maintenance/Clubhouse/Fun activities/Pool area is clean/Game rooms.
Affordable/Close to the beach/No walls/Community services.
People/Activities. —
`Neighbors/Amenities.
There's a lot to do in this park/Friendly neighbors.
Safe/Clubhouse with pool/You can meet people your own age.
I don't have the yard work/Nice people/I like the activities.
It's a very secluded part of city/No solicitors/Quiet/Activities all the time/Pool/Sauna.
Quiet/Lots of activities.
Quiet/Friendly people/Swimming pool.
Pool.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
-ARESEARCH Question: a
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 20
Category: Amenities/services
Senior park/A lot of activities.
Security/Neighbors watch out for you and your home/Lots of activities.
No maintenance/Good activities.
Friendly/Community activity/People looking out for each other.
A lot of activities/Swimming pools.
We have our own home/We an fix it the way we want to/It's better than apartments/Good
neighbors/Good entertainment.
Its like a country club/You get to know the people/Swimming pool.
More activities/Take care of the land/People are willing to help.
Activities for the elderly/Clean.
Small community/Pool.
More secure/Activities.
The social part of it.
Community atmosphere/Amenities.
The upkeep/The managers keep it really neat and clean/I also like closeness of neighbors/We
have a good relationship with the managers/It's quiet/I like having a swimming pool.
The people who live here/The activities and the way it's laid out.
Have a pool.
The companionship and the closeness/The activities are nice/Its good for single women who have
lost their husbands/It gives them a social life/We have fun.
Like the neighbors/Quiet/A lot of activities.
They keep it up clean nice and activities for people.
There is all the activity you want.
People/Friendship/Social clubs/Very pleasant/Exercising/Quiet/Secure.
Like the club house/Social activities/Nice people.
All the activities that we have for our entertainment and the advantage of good neighbors.
The people/Security/Activities.
Maintenance is cut down/Close neighbors/Lots of activities.
Group activities that we have and the socializing with each other/Neighbors are good to look in on
you and make sure you are all right.
Plenty of activities,such as pool and jacuzzi.
AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents IVerbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 21
Category: Amenities/Services
Price/Privacy/Amenities.
People I have met and the fun we have/The entertainment and dinners are great.
No yard work/Facilities/Conveniences/Little community.
Friendly people/A lot of facilities that most parks don't.
Nice clean parks/Lots of entertainment.
Friendship from all the people living here/Good facilities/ excellent entertainment.
Some very good friends/Fun.
Security/All kinds of activities.
Availability/Activities/Owners are nice.
Sense of community/Easy lifestyle/Easy maintenance/Lots of activities.
Pool/Stationary bicycle/Good breakfasts/Not far from shopping.
Security/ good facilities.
Availability of the recreational areas.
Companionship/Many activities.
Community center.
Recreation part of it all. r
Availability of all the activities.
Entertainment here.
The people are nice/They have good entertainment/I like having people close by.
Your own home/Not much maintenance/Yards and pool are kept up neatly.
Neighborhood/Activities/People look out for each other/Great clubhouse.
Facilities are great.
The opportunities of companionship and activites.
It has a pool.
Lot of pools.
Closeness of the neighbors/Lots of social activities/Fairly safe place.
Its like a family recreation club.
I'ts friendly and if you want a job,your job's in your own compound/It has its own pool.
Playing bingo on friday evening/Live on the corner so no neighbors on sides.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 22
Category: Amenities/Services
It is very friendly and a lot of activities.
The social life like the club houses/You don't have to leave the park to do things.
We live in one that has security,and a locked gate,I like the club house.
The swimming pool/Some of the planned activities.
Closeness/Friendliness neighbor/Pool/Club house/Parties/Bus trips.
Lots of activites.
When I moved here the park was new and everyone was about the same age and we all
participated in programs.
Facilities to enjoy are right here.
Like my neighbors/Club house.
Close community/Neighbors/Interaction/Pool/Club/Socials.
Clubs and the different lessons/Card playing/Swimming pool.
Knowing neighbors/Entertainment/Recreation/Security.
Closeness of the people/You have your own little community and things going on and
entertainment.
The swimming.
Category: Quality of Home
Convenient/Self-contained unit/I like that it's small/Easier to maintain.
Well built.
Security/Like the home.
Simple/One floor/Convenient/Safe/Quiet.
It is a single unit and it does not attach to any other place.
Secure community/Like the way homes are manufactured.
Bigger home for the money/Leave for lengths of time and know it's safe/Good location.
Beautiful home and nice community.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 23
Category: Inside Space
Twice as much living space/No yard work.
Space/Little upkeep.
have a nice roomy place/My own furniture/Can do what I want with it.
like it being compact.
Upkeep/Privacy/Compact.
don't have to maintain the yard or home/Easy shopping/One level/Clean.
It's convenient/Everything is compact.
1 like the convenience and there's a lot of livable space.
Category: Outside Space
Safe/Private/No close neighbors.
Some space outside.
Not too close together.
It is quiet and you have land that you can do things with.
Very quiet/Beautiful park/Enough room between each mobile.
Playing bingo on friday evening/Live on the corner so no neighbors on sides.
My own home/I have privacy when I want it/Not a big yard.
A gated community/Well maintained/I have a very large space.
Category: Home Ownership
I have my own place/Neighbors.
My own.
I own my home.
We have our own home/We an fix it the way we want to/It's better than apartments/Good
neighbors/Good entertainment.
Feeling of being in own home.
Your own home/Not much maintenance/Yards and pool are kept up neatly.
My own home/I have privacy when I want it/Not a big yard.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 24
Category: Home Ownership
Independence of property owning.
Category: For Seniors
Senior park/A lot of activities.
Elderly who live there.
Quiet/Clean/No bothering children/Kept up.
The privacy/No children/No animals/Everything we want.
Safety/Especially when were not here/No pets or kids/Well located.
It's more like a family/We're a senior park and so we have people that are our own age/The rules
are made for people like us.
This is a senior park and we have a good friendship with neighbors.
%,ategory: For Families
Know everyone/Safety/Quiet/All ages.
Category: General Positive
Better than renting a house.
Better than an apartment/Cheaper than houses.
Freedom.
Make friends easier/Nicer than an apartment.
It's a good place for a weekend getaway.
It's like living in a mobile home.
Everything is really handy.
Good way of living/Peaceful and relaxed.
Better than an apartment/You don'have to worry about having someone above you, or underneath
you.
Independence of not living in an apartment.
Like the living.
AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents verbatim Responses
IESEARCH Question: 4
PUBUG AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 25
Category: General Positive
Comfortable and nice place to live.
Freedom that I do what I want to do in my own space.
Everything.
It is a place to live/Roof over your head.
It is the greatest.
Easy to go,no problems in or out.
Nice park and area.
1 like it.
Category. Don't Know/No Opinion
No comment.
I can't think of anything.
No comment.
No comment.
Nothing.
I don't know.
No comment.
1 don't know.
Nothing.
No idea. —
Uke nothing about it.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
I would not like to tell you that.
Don't know.
None.
No opinion.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 4
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 26
Category: Misc.
No common walls.
1 can't answer truthfully because I live here for pay/I am required to live here for my job.
Transport.
I like the weather here.
Have a golf course to space things out.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 27
Q.5 And what are some of the things you like least about mobile home park living?
(N=400)
Category: Management/Owners
Lack of control with management.
Noisy neighbors/The park management doesn't run the park like a business.
Too many children/Pets mess all over the place/Poor managers/People drive too fast.
Don't clean streets/Raising the rent/Everything needs repair/Children breaking into the storage
area/The management is unwilling to discuss matters/Teenagers running between the coaches.
Problems with managers/Prices are dropping/Can't afford to sell.
Greedy mobile home park owners/People forced out of their homes.
Nosy managers/Not enough yard/No garages.
Rent increases/Adding new bills to pay/Management/Its not a senior park anymore/Drugs in the
park/Kids robbing homes/It's not safe.
The lack of communication.
Manager's.
Conflicts with management and the home owners association.
They change the management all the time.
The management.
Restrictions/Management.
The management. _
Management,they don't keep rules or maintenance.
Paying space rent that keeps going up/Park owners are greedy/Don't maintain the grouds/Don't
enforce rules of contract/They can change the contract and you can't do anything about it.
Under constant security/Managers are picky.
Never know what the owners are going to do/Rent raised/Deteriorating homes/Changed from
senior park to family park/Afraid to walk around park.
Don't particularly like to be controlled as much as I am/Management requires too much of my
personal freedom I think I lost a lot of my personal rights when I moved in.
Management.
QAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 5
Pueuc AFFAIRS.MARKETING Page: 28
Category: Management/Owners
Owner lied about the home/ he told me that I would have a place for my coach and now they are
closing the park down.
Category: Rules
A lot of rules/Not much privacy.
The rules are not enforced enough.
Rules and regulations.
Strict rules.
Rules.
Rent increases/No warranties/They don't control people in the park/They don't enforce the rules/
It's now a family park, not a senior citizen park.
Too close/The rules apply to some and not to others.
Some of the rules.
Too many rules.
You can hear what is going on in some of the other coaches/Some of the rules are ridiculous.
Rent increases/A few of the rules concerning visitors.
Would be nice if the neighbors weren't quite so close/People don't follow the rules with their
animals.
Rules/Limitations/Gossiping.
The rules.
Don't like some of the rules.Some of the rules and regulations,like having certain things in a certain place/Parking is pretty bad.
People drive too fast in the park/Some of the restrictions.
Rules and regulations.
Lack of space/Some of the rules.
Restrictions/Management.
Management,they don't keep rules or maintenance.
Control/Restrictions.
Paying space rent that keeps going up/Park owners are greedy/Don't maintain the grouds/Don't
enforce rules of contract/They can change the contract and you can't do anything about it.
' AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
,RESEARCH Question: s
PUBUG AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 29
Category: Rules
Don't like the state inspection/Increase in rent every year/Some of the residents do not keep up
their yards.
Too many rules and regulations/Old folks want to think for you.
Rules for the pool and the clubhouse.
Rules and regulations.
Cannot restrict to just families or seniors.
Some of the rules are not that important.
Rules.
Category. Maintenance
Misbehaving children/Don't keep the streets cleaned/Could be kinder to the elderly/Rent is too
high.
Don't clean streets/Raising the rent/Everything needs repair/Children breaking into the storage
area/The management is unwilling to discuss matters/Teenagers running between the coaches.
They don't take care of the road.
Too close to neighbors/It's hard to park a car/They don't maintain garbage very well/Vehicles
speed through the park.
Poorly maintained fences between lots.
When the weeds get too big.
Some people don't take care of their places.
Management,they don't keep rules or maintenance. _
Paying space rent that keeps going up/Park owners are greedy/Don't maintain the grouds/Don't
enforce rules of contract/They can change the contract and you can't do anything about it.
Category: Parking
The parking lot is too small.
Limited parking spaces/Coaches too close.
Lousy parking.
Too close to neighbors/Its hard to park a car/They don't maintain garbage very well/Vehicles
speed through the park.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents verbatim Responses
N/RESEARCH Question: 5
PMUC AFFAUM•MARKETING Page: 30
Category- Parking
Parking/Noise from neighbors.
Some of the rules and regulations, like having certain things in a certain place/Parking is pretty bad.
Not enough parking.
Parking problems.
Category. Facilities/Amenities
No place for kids to play.
Don't like the laundry facilitates.
It could have more trees and places to play.
Category: Crime/Safety
Noise and confusion/Concerned about getting gangs/We need better security.
Don't clean streets/Raising the rent/Everything needs repair/Children breaking into the storage
area/The management is unwilling to discuss matters/Teenagers running between the coaches.
Rent increases/Adding new bills to pay/Management/It's not a senior park anymore/Drugs in the
park/Kids robbing homes/It's not safe.
Under constant security/Managers are picky.
Never know what the owners are going to do/Rent raised/Deteriorating homes/Changed from
senior park to family park/Afraid to walk around park.
Category: New Developments
They are tearing up the trailer park to build condominiums.
Greedy mobile home park owners/People forced out of their homes.
Developments forcing me to move.
They're trying to get rid of the older coaches and I live in one.
Uncertainty of whether the land will be sold out from under me.
Can raise rent anytime they want to/Break lease by telling people they have to leave because of
hotel being built.
1 _AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 31
Category: New Developments
Owner lied about the home/ he told me that I would have a place for my coach and now they are
closing the park down.
Category., Rent/Expense
Rent is a little high.
Too expensive.
Not knowing when rent is going to be raised.
Misbehaving children/Don't keep the streets cleaned/Could be kinder to the elderly/Rent is too
high.
High rent.
Rent increases.
High rent.
The rent goes up every year.
The rent is too high.
Rent.
Don't clean streets/Raising the rent/Everything needs repair/Children breaking into the storage
area/The management is unwilling to discuss matters/Teenagers running between the coaches.
Rent.
Rent increase.
I don't like the yearly rent increase.
Rent increase.
Increasing rent.
Rent.
Can't control rent.
Rent increases/No warranties/They don't control people in the park/They don't enforce the rules/
Its now a family park, not a senior citizen park.
High rent.
Rent increases/Adding new bills to pay/Management/It's not a senior park anymore/Drugs in the
park/Kids robbing homes/It's not safe.
Rent increases every year.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
°RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 32
Category: Rent/Expense
You can't buy the land/You have to pay rent.
Rent.
Rates are increasing.
The space rent.
The space rent.
The control the management has on the rent.
Rent increases.
Keep raising the rent.
The rent going up every year/You really don't own you own property/Hard with kids.
Rent
Paying the space rent.
Don't like paying the rent.
don't like the rent going up every year.
1 don't like the new generation moving in/It affects our income/Rent becomes more expensive.
The rent
The rent is too high. w
Rent keeps going up.
Rent increases/A few of the rules concerning visitors.
They raise the rent every year.
Cost
Raise in rent.
Rent keeps going up.
Main consideration is the rent.
Rent increases.
When the rent raises.
The rent
Space rent.
Rent keeps going up.
The rent.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: s
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 33
Category: Rent/Expense
Rents going up.
Excessive rent.
Rent.
High rent.
No garage/No air conditioning/TOo many people know your business/Could use rent control.
Rent goes up every single year.
I don't like the rent going up all the time.
Rent increases constantly.
Rent is to high.
Rent goes up.
Rent.
Paying rent.
Rent goes up constantly.
High rent.
High rent.
w
Rent.
Rent goes up/Not really ever owning your land/Paying rent for the space.
Rent is too high/The rent on the land is too high.
Uncertainty of rent increasing.
Rented/Not house in many aspects.
Paying space rent that keeps going up/Park owners are greedy/Don't maintain the grouds/Don't
enforce rules of contract/They can change the contract and you can't do anything about it.
Don't like the state inspection/Increase in rent every year/Some of the residents do not keep up
their yards.
Can raise rent anytime they want to/Break lease by telling people they have to leave because of
hotel being built.
The man that I live next door to/Its like living next to the city dump/They raise the rent every year/
The man that owns the park is not greedy he's entitled to a raise.
Rent.
Paying the rent.
High rent.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents verbatim Responses
//RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 34
Category: Rent/Expense
Rent to high.
The rent is too high.
The rent is to high to many animals.
Never know what the owners are going to do/Rent raised/Deteriorating homes/Changed from
senior park to family park/Afraid to walk around park.
Space renting is getting high.
The rent is being raised too high.
Pay a lot of rent.
Paying for upkeep.
The increase of rent/You can't own your property,you have to rent.
Our rent goes with the cost of living and that makes me unhappy living on a fixed income being
retired.
Rent going up every year.
No control over rent.
It isn't cheap living.
High rent.
Rent keeps coming up.
Annual increase of space rent.
Not owning the land/Payments go up every year.
Category: Land Ownership
I don't own property.
don't own my land.
Not owning my own property and home.
You can't buy the land/You have to pay rent.
The rent going up every year/You really don't own you own property/Hard with kids.
We have as much invested in our home as they do in the property and I don't like that.
Don't own the property under your home.
Don't own our own land.
' .AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 35
Category. Land Ownership
Don't own the property.
Rent goes up/Not really ever owning your land/Paying rent for the space.
Don't own the ground your home is on.
The increase of rent/You can't own your properly,you have to rent.
Don't own the land.
You don't own the property.
Not owning the land/Payments go up every year.
Category. Home Ownership
Not owning my own property and home.
category: Home Values
Homes don't increase in value.
Problems with managers/Prices are dropping/Can't afford to sell.
Market values of mobile homes not as high as houses.
Category: Condition/Quality of Home
Too flimsy in the wind/Leaks from earthquakes/Cold. _
Cheaply constructed.
The noise factor,its not well insulated.
No garage/No air conditioning/TOo many people know your business/Could use rent control.
In the winter,when it rains,you can barely hear your television.
Some of the structure itself is very limited/You can't get both of the comforts.
Rented/Not house in many aspects.
Climate control isn't same as in a home/Repairs difficult to get done.
Flimsy mobile homes/They would fall apart in a big wind.
The home itself/It's not as sturdy as a regular house.
LLAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 36
Category: Condition/Qualify of Home
Have trouble keeping my home level.
Category: Inside Space
There is not enough space in my mobile home/I would rather have a house that is planted on the
ground.
The amount of space.
Not enough space.
Sometimes you don't have enough room.
Not enough space.
The space for company and that sort of thing/Guests that stay overnight/As far as sleeping areas.
Space.
.category: Lack of Storage
Need more storage space.
Well stored space.
Lack of storage.
Category: No Garages
No garage for a workshop.No garage.
No garage.
Nosy managers/Not enough yard/No garages.
1 miss a garage,and a yard.
No garage.
No garage.
Miss having a larger yard and garage.
No garage/No air conditioning/TOo many people know your business/Could use rent control.
' AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
.IESEARCH Question: s
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 37
Category: No Garages
No garage.
No garage.
1 miss a garage.
Category: Outside Space
More space between coaches/Cliques in community.
Limited parking spaces/Coaches too close.
Too close to other neighbors.
Inconsideration from people who live here/Houses are too close.
The homes are too close together/Fire traps.
Closeness.
Nosy managers/Not enough yard/No garages.
Too close to neighbors/It's hard to park a car/They don't maintain garbage very well/Vehicles
speed through the park.
Too close/The rules apply to some and not to others.
The homes are too close together.
Trailers are real close together.
I miss a garage, and a yard.
I don't like the closeness because when you are talking sometimes you can be heard by the people
next door, news travels fast also so everyone knows when you say or do something.
Too close together.
The coaches are too close together.
Would be nice if the neighbors weren't quite so close/People don't follow the rules with their
animals.
Overcrowed.
Miss having a larger yard and garage.
Closeness of neighbors.
Very crowded/Noise.
Don't have a whole lot of land.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
o
RESEARCH Question: 5
AUBUG AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 36
Category: Outside Space
Lack of space/Some of the rules.
Living too close together.
Don't like the state inspection/Increase in rent every year/Some of the residents do not keep up
their yards.
No place to bring up children/Your front yard is a street.
You live to close to other people.
The amount of people in the same area.
Crowded.
The closeness of people.
Neighbors are a little too close.
To close to your neighbors.
How easy it is to be disturbed by the neighbors noise because of how close together they were.
Was used to more yard room before, but after you get so old,you don't need that.
Category: Neighbors/People
More space between coaches/Cliques in community.
Rule breakers.
Nosy people.
Too many children/Pets mess all over the place/Poor managers/People drive too fast.
Inconsideration from people who live here/Houses are too close. _
1 used to know everyone in the park, but not anymore.
Too close to neighbors/It's hard to park a car/They don't maintain garbage very well/Vehicles
speed through the park.
Neighbors don't mind their own business.
don't like the new generation moving in/It affects our income/Rent becomes more expensive.
People sure seem to be very opinionated and they try to force their opinions on you.
Rules/Limitations/Gossiping.
Congestion/Old women gossiping.
Some people that we don't like.
] _AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
,RESEARCH Question: 5
Pu9UC AFFAIRS•MARKETING - Page: 39
Category: Neighbors/People
Grouchy old people.
Neighbors.
People drive too fast in the park 1 Some of the restrictions.
No-garage/No.air conditioning 1 TOo many people know your business/Could use rent control.
I don't Eke the fact that people have their own groups.
The-Tnan that I live next door to/It's like living next to the city dump/They raise the rent every year/
The man that owns the park is not greedy he's entitled to a raise.
Someone is always watching you so you don't have the freedom/You would have in a single
detached home.
Some people are nosy.
Category. Lack cif-Privacy
A lot ofrWes[Not much privacy.
don't like the closeness because when you are talking sometimes you can be heard by the people
next door,news travels fast also so everyone knows when you say or do something.
You can hear what is going on in some of the other coaches/Some of the rules are ridiculous.
Category: Noisy
Too much noise/Too many kids.
Noisy neighbors 1 The park management doesn't run the park like a business. _
Noise and confusion/Concerned about getting gangs/We need better security.
Parking/Noise from neighbors.
When they fix-things it's very noisy.
Very crowded 1 Noise.
How easy it is to be disturbed by the neighbors noise because of how close together they were.
Category. Children Allowed
Misbehaving children/Don't keep the streets cleaned/Could be kinder to the elderly/Rent is too
high.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
✓IRESEARCH Question: s
PUSUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 40
Category: Children Allowed
Too much noise/Too many kids.
Too many children/Pets mess all over the place/Poor managers/People drive too fast.
Rowdy children.
Don't clean streets/Raising the rent/Everything needs repair/Children breaking into the storage
area/The management is unwilling to discuss matters/Teenagers running between the coaches.
It was a senior park/Now it's a family park.
Rent increases/No warranties/They don't control people in the park/They don't enforce the rules/
Its now a family park, not a senior citizen park.
It used to be a senior park/Young kids disturb the peace.
Rent increases/Adding new bills to pay/Management/It's not a senior park anymore/Drugs in the
park/Kids robbing homes/It's not safe.
Allowing disturbing children and animals in the park.
Change from senior to family living.
Turn into family park.
Children in the park.
The teenagers (vandalism).
Never know what the owners are going to do/Rent raised/Deteriorating homes/Changed from
senior park to family park/Afraid to walk around park.
First adult park now families present.
Category: No Children Allowed _
No children.
Category: Pets Allowed
Too many children/Pets mess all over the place/Poor managers/People drive too fast.
Animals.
Allowing disturbing children and animals in the park.
Would be nice if the neighbors weren't quite so close/People don't follow the rules with their
animals.
AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 41
Category: Pets Allowed
The rent is to high to many animals.
Category: No Pets Allowed
You can't have pets.
They're proposing a no pets rule.
No pets.
Category: Elderly
Misbehaving children/Don't keep the streets cleaned/Could be kinder to the elderly/Rent is too
high.
You can't have parties,because the elderly get angry.
Category. People Dying
Too many old people dying.
Sometimes it's depressing because it is a senior citizen park/iT's sad when people die.
Category: General Negative
I don't like living in mobile homes period they suck. —
Don't care much for a trailer.
Don't like looking at mobile homes.
Not a good investment.
Category: General Positive
Nothing.
No complaints.
Nothing.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
47RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 42
Category: General Positive
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
None.
Nothing.
Nothing.
None.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
a
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
None.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
No complaints.
Nothing.
can't think of anything.
Nothing.
Nothing.
I _AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: s
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 43
Category: General Positive
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nice and quiet here.
Nothing.
Don't have anything don't like.
Got everything we need right here.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
1 can't think of anything.
Nothing.
I can't think of anything.
v
No complaints.
Nothing really.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
No complaints.
There isn't anything about this park that I dislike.
Nothing.
None.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Don't have any complaints.
Nothing.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
-ARESEARCH Question: s
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 44
Category: General Positive
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
1 can't think of anything.
Nothing.
I can't think of anything right now.
Nothing.
Nothing.
can't think of anything.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Cant think of any.
Nothing. w
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing I don't like.
Nothing.
I don't know anything bad about it.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Don't have a problem with it.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 45
Category: General Positive
Nothing.
Nothing.
can't think of anything.
Nothing really/I just like it.
Nothing.
Can't think of anything off hand.
Nothing.
I don't have a problems.
Nothing.
I can't think of anything.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Most of the people are friendlier than what they would be in a regular housing development.
Nothing.
Nothing.
d
Nothing.
None.
Can't think of anything.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Nothing.
I can not think of anything.
1 don't know of any.
Nothing.
Nothing.
Don't have any dislikes.
No complaints.
don't see any.
I don't have any complaints.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
o
RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 46
Category: General Positive
Nothing.
1 can't think of anything.
Nothing.
1 can't think of anything that I like least about it.
Nothing.
Category: Don't Know/No Opinion
No opinion.
No opinion.
No comment.
No comment.
I've never thought about it.
don't know.
I don't know.
No opinion.
No comment.
Don't know.
Don't know.
No opinion.
Category. Misc.
The transportation of the home.
The outside of the buildings need to be improved.
You can't take home with you when you leave.
Very little control on it.
Can't get out unless somebody picks her up.
1 would like living on a boat better.
Limitations on what you can build.
_AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 5
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 47
Category: Misc.
I do not have any kicks about it.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents J Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 11
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 48
Q.11 You said that park maintenance and repairs are very unacceptable to you. Would
you elaborate on that? Any examples? (N=16)
Category: Misc
Too many cars parking in the street/Too much junk/Fire hazard.
No one has fixed the street/Chuck holes/Closed down the clubhouse/No lounge.
The road is unacceptable.
No comment.
Parking.
Road repairs/Club and pool facilities.
Things don't look as nice as when they first moved here/Problems aren't looked into/The
properties aren't kept up/Bad lighting.
No opinion.
Pool was broken and they fixed it as fast as they could.
I'm trying to sell my house/No one will buy it because my three neighbors don't take care of their
yard/There are weeds everywhere.
They used to pay for the water and the trash and then we got stuck with it.
have security laser that got broken and it took them ten days to repair it.
If the plumbing goes they don't have anything to do with it!F your car port needs asphalting they
don't have anything to do with it/Pests/People in the streets.
Have not done repairs/Coach now run down. _
The streets are never swept/Don't trim the trees over the street/Let kids run wild.
Park is going to be closed down/When there are potholes in the roads and because they are closing
the park they are not fixing these things.
I .A1lVRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 12
PUWC AFFAW•MARKMG Page: 49
0.12 You said that the resolution of problems is very unacceptable to you. Would you
- elaborate on that? Any examples?(N=24)
Category: Misc
I have no rights/I don't get listened to.
The management harasses a young couple in the park,and no one will do anything about it.
The resolution brought no answer.
The manager doesn't listen to problems.
They don't try to solve problems.
Animals.
.Managers won't work with people.
Nothing is getting done about noisy neighbors.
No comment.
They don't enforce the rules.
Complaints aren't taken care of/People do whatever they want/There are not enough
consequences.
Rent is too high/I can't afford it.
My friend had a gas leak and the manger was mad because I called him to fix it and he was in the
shower.
Showing partiality.
Hard to change places and parks. —
There isn't any resolution of problems,the manager decides.
I was the president of the homeowners association and it was hard to follow through.
Owners von't consklerselling to us/I don't think that's really fair after living here for so long/They
-ought to give us a break.
Owner was here and decided to close side walks except ours/When the kids were doing damage to
property.
Nothing gets done.
One of the owners told some ladies off,he can't be bothered/ he has other things to do.
Prices,and there is no response for problems.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
-fRESEARCH Question: 12
PUBUG AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 50
Category: Misc
Can't seem to get cooperation with some of the maintenance people/The manager seems to think
that the problem is yours and not theirs.
Do not follow well.
r
AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I verbatim Responses
I E S EAR C H Question: 22
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 51
Q.22 What partiality or preferences do you feel are being given in your park?(N=82)
Category: Management/owners
The management is partial to certain people.
The manager has moved his family members into the park.
Owners kids getting preferences.
Some get bawled out about animals but others don't/Manager is very partial.
I can do anything I want, because of my relationship with the management.
Category: Rent/Lease Terms
Guarantees of no rent increases for new people.
Different rates of pay and monthly charges/Rules are not the same.
Compensation.
Some get rent increases while others do not.
Some people get cheaper rent/The wealthy get more favors.
Rent breaks to new people coming in.
Terms of ground leases.
Rent advantages.
Let people move in at cheaper prices/Raise their rent in two years/Force people out oTthe parks
and get their homes when they leave/ Making a profit off other peoples losses. law.
They are letting in people for less rent.
Rent is not equal/The rent for the new people that are moving in is cheaper than for those that have
lived here for a while.
Category: Rules
Rules are not enforced for some and are inflicted upon others.
Rules are bent for some people and not others.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 22
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 52
Category: Rules
Rules are being bent.
Different rates of pay and monthly charges/Rules are not the same.
Parking problems/Some tenants are allowed to have pets while others are not/It's very selective in
whom the rules are enforced on.
What you can do depends on who you are/If you belong to the clique,you get your way/Otherwise,
you don't/Some people break the rules and get by with it/And others can't.
They put up one rule, but they allow some people to break it/They don't enforce the rules.
Bending of the rules for friends.
Some people they don't enforcer the rules to make them clean the outsides of their mobile homes
Not equally enforcing the rules with every body.
Category: Parking
A tenant had damage done to his roof after limbs fell on it/Management did not tell him in advance
what they were doing/Some get to park in visitor parking and others do not.
Parking problems/Some tenants are allowed to have pets while others are not/It's very selective in
whom the rules are enforced on.
w
Parked cars.
Parking/Speeding/Upkeep.
Category. Repair/Upkeep
Repair and respect.
Some places are not kept as well as others.
Some people they don't enforcer the rules to make them clean the outsides of their mobile homes
Parking/Speeding/Upkeep.
Category: Communication
A tenant had damage done to his roof after limbs fell on it/Management did not tell him in advance
what they were doing/Some get to park in visitor parking and others do not.
Some requests are ignored while others are not.
_AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 22
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 53
Category: Families
Some get better treatment/Families are getting better treatment.
Towards families with children.
Category. Seniors
They give to olderpeople more.
The seniors get to use the clubhouse more than the families do.
Category. Non-Seniors
There are people here that shouldn't be here/It's supposed to be a senior park for people over fifty
but there are some people here that are younger than that.
There are a lot of people that aren't seniors/They shouldn't have gotten into the park.
Category: Pets
Animals.
Parking problems/Some tenants are allowed to have pets while others are not/It's very selective in
whom the rules are enforced on.
Some get bawled out about animals but others don't/Manager is very partial.
Category.: Racial Prejudice
They are trying to keep minorities out of the park.
Very prejudice.
Category: General Negative
One side of the park is given better treatment than the other.
Running a business and living in the park.
Some people are getting added things that others are not.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
'fRESEARCH Question: 22
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 54
Category-. General Negative
Let certain people get away with things that they wouldn't let others get away with.
People with the nicer ones get preferential treatment.
Category: General Positive
None/Problems are dealt with as soon as they are reported/Opinions and recommendations are
listened to and accepted.
Ifs running well.
Category: None/Nothing
None.
None/Problems are dealt with as soon as they are reported/Opinions and recommendations are
listened to and accepted.
None.
Nothing.
None. a
None.
None.
None.
None.
Nothing.
None.
None.
None.
None.
Category: Don't Know/No Opinion
No opinion.
No opinion.
AlLAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
rn ESEARCH Question: 22
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 55
Category: Don't Know/No Opinion
No comment.
No comment.
No comment.
No comment.
No comment.
No comment.
No comment.
No comment.
Don't know.
I'm not sure.
No opinion.
No comment.
No opinion.
Refused.
No opinion.
v
No opinion.
No opinion.
That I can't answer.
Category: Misc.They read our meter wrong and when we complained they came back at us with a complaint of their
own.
They didn't press charges on property damage.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
9RESEARCH Question: 24
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 56
Q.24 And what are the main reasons for your preference for a month-to-month lease?
(N=70)
Category. Flexibility
I'm able to leave at any time.
Flexibility/Not locked into a lease.
I want to be able to leave at any time.
Flexibility.
Very flexible.
I'm able to leave at any time.
I can move at any time.
Able to move easier.
can leave if I need to.
I can move more quickly if I have to.
In case you want to move out with in a month or two,you can/If you had a year lease.
Move out at any time.
It's easier to get out of if you need to move or something.
You never know if you want to leave/You can have a change/If you have a year lease you have to
live there for a year and you cant leave.
You have more control.
Allows more freedom.
Availability to come and go as I like/Don't like to be held back just because of rent.
Never know if you want to stay or move.
Can leave at any time.
Can move whenever I want to with out having to worry about anything.
Get out.
1 .AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 24
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 57
Category: Don Like Leases
I don't like leases.
Flexibility/Not locked into a lease.
I don't want to be stuck with a long lease.
You have to stay for the amount of time on the lease.
Not tied to a lease.
No long term contracts.
Tied down for a whole year longer.
Availability to come and go as I like/Don't like to be held back just because of rent.
Five year lease is not fair/I don't trust it/I like the month to month.
Your not tied into the certain rent.
More fair for me.
category: Things Change
They could change the rules.
Never know what will come up. 5
Things change.
You never know if you want to leave/You can have a change/If you have a year lease you have to
live there for a year and you cant leave.
In case something happens.
Things could happen. _
Who's to say we are going to be here in a year.
Category: Elderly
Elderly.
Elderly can't plan on long term arrangements.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 24
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 58
Category: Cheaper
Don't pay as much.
Financial factor of the rent.
Category. Rent Control
hope a rent control ordinance will be adopted.
In case they get rent control,no advantage of the rent control.
Rent goes too high.
In case we have an increase in price.
Category. Easier
Its easier to pay every month.
Easy to pay.
Easier to work with.
It is easier to pay.
Keep the books out of the way and keep track of things.
Category: ff Need To Sell
If I don't like it I can sell out.
-Opportunity to sell came up.
Category: It's All They Offer
That's all they do here.
That's what they offer.
That is all they provide.
Because they pressure us to.
_AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 24
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 59
Category. General Positive
I like it that way.
Safe.
Always done it that way and I like it like that.
Very helpful for me.
Started that way should stay that way.
Just a good way to go.
Category. General Negative
Management is not trust worthy.
Category. No Reasons
No special reason.
No reason.
Category. Dont'Know/No Opinion
None.
None.
I do not know.
Category. Misc.
It is divided up with authority.
Does not have one.
Because 1 get social security.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 25
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 60
Q.25 And what are the main reasons for your preference for this type of lease?(N=230)
Category: Security/Stability
You always know what you'll be paying.
Living day by day/I like knowing I have a long stay here.
You never know what will happen in the future.
Security.
Security.
Security.
You can be sure you will always live there.
Stability.
Security.
Rent stabilization.
You know when and what you have to pay/You don't have to worry about the rate of financing going
up
It's a little safer.
I would presume your rent would be stable.
To know where I stand and how much rent I will pay.
I would be assured of my rental space.
Know what's happening year by year.
Security.
Know what the rent would be for the year.
Stability.
There is security at least for one year.
Would feel a little safer/You wouldn't have to worry about getting kicked out or something like that.
Security in knowing where I will be living.
know what I am doing for the year.
Lease is locked in for the year.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
gESEARCH Question: 25
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 61
Category-. security Stability
Security of future living.
Feel safe.
Like to know where I stand and if you sign up for a longer lease ,you loose out on rent control.
Stability.
More secure.
Paying rent a year ahead gives me security for the year to come/I know exactly where i'II be and
won't have to worry about it.
You feel settled.
You know you are going to pay the same rent for the whole year/They up it yearly/With a Ibnger
lease you pay more in the long-run.
To keep people from moving in and out.
Gives stability to everyone.
Like to have things settled and not always up in the air.
Might move at the end of the year/Don't want less than a year so I won't be forced to leave.
Guaranteed for both me and the owner.
To make sure I could stay here.
Have a big investment in my mobile home to not have any security
A set payment agreement.
Category. Steady Rent
Steady rent.
Steady rent.
Steady rent.
Steady rent.
Steady rent.
Steady rent.
To keep rent steady.
LLAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 25
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 62
Category: One Year Long Enough
More than a year is too binding.
don't like long leases.
Five years is too long/Month to month is too short.
We have a year to decide if we like it/If we don't,we can move.
Don't get trapped into a mobile home forever.
You're locked in a rental agreement otherwise.
I like the lease agreements for one year leases.
A one year lease can be beneficial.
I don't want to be tied down by a long lease.
A years time is enough.
One month is too short and there's no limitation on the lease for more than one year.
The one year lease would be most beneficial.
A one year lease is fine.
Not be tied down.
Sufficient enough to live in.
I've lived here so long I'm not on a month to month/You never know what will happen so 1 don't want
it more than a year.
Longer lease would keep you tied to the park.
Anything more is too much.
It gives me options/I'm not tied to anything.
Month-to-month/Just a rental agreement/Over a year is not necessary. —
'One year is the standard.
Not tie self down to more than a year.
Don't like long term arrangements.
One year sounds good.
Category: No Increase Worries
I don't have to worry about an increase.
Longer protection.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 25
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 63
Category. No Increase Worries
The rent doesn't increase.
You can't be protected in rental fees in a one year lease.
don't have to worry about rent for a year.
It's better to have a long lease with no increases.
Rent increases/Offers more freedom/Month-to-month would be out of control.
You know when and what you have to pay/You don't have to worry about the rate of financing going
up.
It controls the rent increase.
The one that we signed was a 5 year lease and rent raises 8 percent every year.
One year would be economically more feasible.
A longer lease would make you open to too many raises.
Rent is raised every year so if I put it for over a year then I won't be subjected to that.
Real good management here and the rent doesn't multiply.
Longer lease/Your space rent would be less.
Rent would be set for those years.
It's fair to me that I don't move out or get charged more/I don't want to be moving every month.
They don't seem to raise the monthly rent/You can still sell the lease.
Everytime your lease is renewed,the price goes up.
Don't have to worry about the lease.
Keep raising rent each year and if I was renting,I would want a six month lease/Nice thing about
owning you can do what you want. _
Don't have to worry about your rent being raised.
So rent doesn't go up.
Rent fluctuates in any other plan.
Price control range.
Because a lease changes the rent,and the rent goes up.
More rent control.
Only if the rent would stay the same.
Like to know where I stand and if you sign up for a longer lease ,you loose out on rent control.
Don't get the raises as often.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents I Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 25
PUBUC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 64
Category: No Increase Worries
Paying rent a year ahead gives me security for the year to come/I know exactly where i'II be and
won't have to worry about it.
I would not want the rates to go up each month.
You know you are going to pay the same rent for the whole year/They up it yearly/With a longer
lease you pay more in the long-run.
Month-to-month/Just a rental agreement/Over a year is not necessary.
With one year there isn't to much protection.
Less increases.
That way if they raise the rent during the year I can get out.
Wouldn't have to worry about it.
If you have an annual lease,they can't raise rent every few months like they can in month to month
leases.
Do not have as many raises in the pay.
It doesn't get raised as much as month to month does.
Rent control.
At least you know they are not going to raise rent.
We're trying to get a ceiling on rent.
Then they wouldn't be able to raise rent.
Basic rate control/They could raise it if you did month to month.
Category. Planning Ahead _
You can plan ahead easier.
Advanced notice.
You are able to plan ahead better.
Rent raises might be better planned and anticipated.
Financial planning.
It gives you a better idea of financing.
Financial planning.
I_AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
r-IE S EAR C H Question: 25
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 65
Category: No Plans To Leave
I plan to be here for a while.
I'm here to stay.
Plan on staying here for a long time because we like it here.
Plan to be here for a long time.
This is as long as I will live/I'm 80 years old and I have a 10 year lease.
Not going anywhere.
I'm at ease because I'm going to stay here longer.
Category: Easier/Less Trouble
It saves time in having to renew the lease every month.
Easier payments.
You don't have to pay every month.
It is easier to remember.
Its more convenient/There are no problems with a one year lease.
To get it out of the way. r
Don't have to go through the hassle and inconvenience.
You wouldn't have to run to the office every month,you could just pay once for the whole year.
They did a monthly,it was a hassle.
Having to redo the lease month after month.
Don't have to deal with it every month. —
Cuts all the stresses of going through the lease stuff.
Category: Time To Negotiate Terms
It gives you enough time to negotiate problems you run into.
Better chance to negotiate/Shorter lease time.
If any thing monumental comes up you have time to take care of home affairs.
1 don't have to negotiate every month.
It gives us a little warning on what to expect for the year and if there's anything we don't like we can
talk and compromise.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents i Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 25
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 66
Category: Time To Negotiate Terms
Gives me an opportunity to stop and reevaluate my situation.
So you can have time to decide.
Category: Flexible
Flexible.
I can change where I live after one year.
If I didn't like the home I would consider leaving.
With a 1 year lease,you aren't bound to a long term agreement/If I wanted to move, I would only
have to wait out the year instead of waiting out a longer lease.
More freedom.
You can get in and out quickly.
1 can get out if I want.
Category: In Case Of Selling
r'
If they wanted to sell to another owner,they would have to honor our lease instead of making us
move.
Just in case I want to sell.
Incase of selling it/Death in the family.
Mobiles are hard to sell/You can't get out what you have put in.
Category: Things Change
In one year finances can change.
I've lived here so long I'm not on a month to month/You never know what will happen so I don't want
it more than a year.
The owners dont own the land/I dont know how long we will be here.
I don't know how long I'm going to be living and things change.
Things change.
In case things change during the year/Can give notice ahead of time.
1 .AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
.::I E S EARC H Question: 25
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 67
Category: Rules Change
New rules come with new leases.
They put up rules every six months.
Category. Age/Elderly
Elderly.
Because of age.
Because of my age.
My age.
Its my age I'm not going to be around too long.
Category: More Fair
More fair.
More fair that way.
Its fair to me that I don't move out or get charged more/1 don't want to be moving every month.
Fair.
A year is far for both parties.
Category: Cost Of Living
Cost of living.
Category: Park Conditions
Conditions of park.
Category. General Positive
It's better to have five years.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents verbatim Responses
RESEARCH question: 25
PueUC AFFAJRs•MARKETING Page: 68
Category. General Positive
Good lease.
prefer it.
I'm completely satisfied with how a year lease works.
The way it has always been.
That's the way it has always been/I don't want to change it.
I don't have a preference.
It would be for the best.
I feel more comfortable.
It's just my preference.
Done it that way for a long time and there are no problems with it.
If you're going to decide to live here you would need to stay at least a month.
It's the easiest for me/I have always had it like that.
I've had it all the years I've been here and I am used to it.
Real good management here and the rent doesn't multiply.
The lease is always coming up/3-5 years would be more acceptable.
Would be satisfied for a year.
They just give it to us that way.
There wouldn't be so many different people moving in and out of here all the time.
It's just better that way.
Don't like the uncertainty of change.
Don't need to change things.
have no complaints/It's what I'm used to.
Category: Don't Know/No Opinion
No comment.
I don't know.
I'm not sure.
No comment.
AWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
RESEARCH Question: 25
PUBLIC AFFAIRS•MARKETING Page: 69
Category. Don't Know/No Opinion
No comment.
No comment.
No comment.
I don't know.
Don't know.
Refused.
would rather not tell you.
No opinion.
None.
None.
No reason.
Not sure.
I don't know.
I have no problems.
Category. Misc.
Other housing is expensive.
You can't move out with a lease.
Close to the beach.
Just because.It doesn't make any difference.
This is the best park/Everything is taken care of/It really clean.
Had a bigger home/Now I'm in a small place.
It sounds like a longer period of time.
Expect to live way longer.
The usual 12 month deal, and I have no problem with it.
In case I found a better deal.
No other choice.
LAWRENCE Huntington Beach MHP Residents Verbatim Responses
-ARESEARCH . Question: 25
PUBLIC AFFAMS•MARKETING Page: 70
Category: Misc.
Don't own the property under your home so they could kick you out whenever they wanted.
-Oven home.
You can do it one time and handle other business.
There is no guarantee.
GROUPTABS FORMAT EXPLANATION
Grouptabs are best understood in comparison with crosstabs:
A crosstab takes a question and shows you where the rg oups are.
A grouptab takes a group and shows you where the questions are.
In other words, grouptabs are the reverse of crosstabs. We focus on a subgroup of
the population (for example, senior citizens) and show you how they answered each
question.
All of the numbers shown in grouptabs can also be found in crosstabs. But instead of
having to look at every crosstab page to determine a particular group's patterns, we
organize it for you on one grouptab page. This is a significant help in forming coalitions
,and determining themes for specific target groups.
Each page of printout lists at the top the group which is being analyzed by the grouptab
(such as Men, Republicans, Under $15K Income, Smith Voters, etc.).
The printout itself is organized into five columns:
i
Question: The question in point.
Answer(s): The answer or combination of answers in point.
Grp: The percentage the group gave to that answer.
Agg: The percentage the total sample gave to that answer.
Diff: The difference (plus or minus) between the group's
percentage minus the total sample's percentage.
The questions and answers are rank ordered on the difference between the group and
the total sample. Answers which differ most on the high side from the average are found
at the top of the list. Answers which differ most on the low side from the average are
shown at the bottom of the list with negative numbers.
For example:
65+ (Senior Citizens)
Question Answer(, Grp Agg Diff
27 Foreign Aid Approve 69 58 11
2 Right Direction Right Direction 54 44 10
Nation
7 John Smith ID 1 + 2 63 54 9
44 Senate Vote Smith 51 44 7
This partial table indicates that:
69% of senior citizens (the subject of this table) answered "approve" to
Q.27 regarding foreign aid. This is 11 percentage points higher than the
average answer of 58% for the whole sample.
54%of them answered "right direction"to Q.2 regarding whether the nation
is going in the right direction or off on the wrong track. This is 10 points
higher than average.
63% of senior citizens gave either answer #1 or answer #2 to Q.7 the
John Smith ID question. Answer categories 1 and 2 are the favorable
answers about John Smith and this percentage places seniors 9 points
higher than average. (An upcoming improvement in the software will also
print a descriptive label as well as show you when one or more categories
are combined.)
Smith gets 51% of the senior citizen vote which is 7 points higher than the
average from the total sample.
When the reader scans down the rank-ordered questions and answers, a certain pattern
of answers usually becomes apparent. In the above example, senior citizens can be
seen to be optimists, pro-Republican and pro-foreign-aid in their orientation.
The answers which do not deviate from the average by more than plus-or-minus five
percentage points are not included in the printout. The suppression of mid-range values
values (those that don't differ that much from the average) helps you see the highs and
lows for each group more easily.
Any group can thus be studied by itself without having to flip back and forth in the
crosstabs.
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 1
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Free and Clear
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 100 70 30
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 46 40 6
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 81 76 6
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 50 45 6
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 30 25 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 0 6 -6
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 45 51 -6
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 12 19 -7
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 18 25 -7
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 0 14 -14
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 0 17 -17
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 0 26 -26
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 0 27 -27
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 'D 54 -54
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 0 76 -76
r
i
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 2
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Paying Mortgage
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 100 27 74
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 90 51 39
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 45 25 20
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 36 19 17
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 34 23 11
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Somewhat Helpful 42 31 11
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 42 32 10
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 40 31 9
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 20 11 9
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 64 56 8
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 70 62 8
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 32 25 8
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 32 25 7
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 33 26 7
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Unacceptable 1:4 8 6
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 43 37 6
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 57 51 6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 13 8 5
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 41 36 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 49 54 -5
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair 30 37 -7
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 31 38 -7
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 58 65 -7
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 42 50 t8
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Up 9 18 -8
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 40 49 -9
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 28 38 -9
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 32 43 -11
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 29 41 -11
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones _ 33 45 -12
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 55 67 -12
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 40 52 -12
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 12 25 -13
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 62 76 -13
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 24 40 -16
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 10 39 -29
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 0 70 -70
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 3
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Kids in HH
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 91 19 72
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 100 51 49
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 71 27 44
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 62 25 37
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 79 56 23
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 53 31 22
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 50 31 19
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 29 11 18
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Somewhat Helpful 47 31 16
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 24 8 16
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 38 23 16
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Acceptable 47 32 15
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 47 32 15
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 50 36 15
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 50 36 14
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 38 25 13
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Smith 24 11 12
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 38 26 12
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Unfair 24 12 12
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 35 25 11
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Unacceptable 18 8 10
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Dissatisfied 15 6 9
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Unacceptable 21 12 9
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Unfair 21 12 9
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Unfair 15 6 ,8
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Smith 18 9 8
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Unacceptable 18 10 8
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 25 17 8
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Unacceptable 15 7 8
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Unfair 18 10 8
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 59 51 8
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Unfair _ 21 14 7-
!34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 21 14 7
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Somewhat Safe 32 26 6
20 Appointments Available in Rea No 15 9 6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa No Opinion 17 11 6
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Not Very Helpful 21 15 6
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 68 62 6
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Fair 38 33 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 0 6 -6
23 How Would You Renegotiate You Month-To-Month Lease 12 18 -6
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 41 47 -6
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In No Opinion 6 15 -9
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 9 19 -11
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe _ 59 70 -11
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 53 65 -12
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 42 54 -12
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 41 54 -13
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 12 25 -13
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 4
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Cont: Kids in HH
Question Answer(B) Grp Agg Diff
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 21 38 -17
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 32 50 -18
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 24 42 -18
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 29 49 -19
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair 18 37 -19
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 47 67 -19
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 41 65 -24
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 26 52 -25
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 12 38 -26
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 18 45 -27
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 12 41 -29
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 9 40 -31
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 12 43 -31
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 0 39 -39
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 21 70 -49
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 6 76 -70
V
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 5
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Res: Family PK
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 44 19 25
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Unfair 25 12 14
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 44 31 13
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 37 25 13
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 31 19 12
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 39 27 12
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 47 36 12
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Jones 36 24 12
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Unfair 21 10 12
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 22 11 11
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Not Very Helpful 25 15 11
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 34 25 9
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Unacceptable 18 10 8
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 30 23 8
20 Appointments Available in Rea No 16 9 8
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 44 36 8
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Somewhat Helpful 39 31 7
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 33 26 7
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Unfair 13 6 6
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 23 17 6
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Unacceptable 13 7 6
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Unacceptable 10 4 6
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Unacceptable 13 8 6
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 15 10 6
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Unacceptable 17 12 45
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Somewhat Unsafe 8 3 5
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 19 14 5
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 36 31 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 30 37 -7
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 46 54 -8
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair _ 29 37 -8
20 Appointments Available in Rea Yes 81 89 -8
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 31 39 -9
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 30 40 -10
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 38 49 -11 .
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe 59 70 -11
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 58 70 -12
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 52 65 -13
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 28 42 -13
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 55 69 -14
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 37 52 -14
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Fair 21 36 -15
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 25 41 -15
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 29 45 -16
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 50 67 -16
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable _ 47 65 -18
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 31 50 -19
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 21 43 -21
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 47 76 -28
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 6
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Res: Senior PK
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 91 76 15
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 54 43 12
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 60 50 10
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 74 65 9
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 54 45 9
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 49 41 9
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 75 67 8
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Fair 44 36 8
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 49 42 8
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 77 69 7
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 59 52 7
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 71 65 7
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 77 70 7
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe 75 70 6
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 6b 54 6
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 54 49 6
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 45 40 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Not Very Helpful 9 15 -5
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 6 11 -5
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 12 17 -5
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Jones 18 24 -6
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Unfair 4 10 -6
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 20 27 -6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 13 19 -6
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 25 31 -6
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 18 25 -7
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 29 36 -7
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Unfair 4 12 -7
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 6 19 -13
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 7
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Men
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 59 51 9
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 41 35 6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 42 36 6
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 60 54 6
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 34 39 -5
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 12 17 -5
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 70 76 -5
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 16 25 -9
r
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 8
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Women
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 30 25 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 44 51 -7
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 9
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
* Res: < 5 Years
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 55 27 29
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Somewhat Helpful 52 31 20
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Fair 55 36 19
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 83 65 18
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 67 51 16
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 69 54 15
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 38 25 13
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 69 56 13
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 76 65 11
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 48 37 11
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 52 42 10
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 45 35 10
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Staying The Same 24 15 10
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Unacceptable 17 8 9
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 2'l 11 9
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Smith 21 11 9
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa No Opinion 19 11 7
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 38 31 7
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 59 52 7
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 31 25 7
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe 76 70 6
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 31 25 6
36 Primary or Secondary Residenc Secondary 7 1 6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 75 69 6
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Refused 7 2 -5
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 24 19 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included
20 Appointments Available in Rea No 3 9 -5
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 34 40 -5
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Somewhat Safe 21 26 -5
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 21 26 -5
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Fair _ 28 33 -5-
`37 Prefer to Live in Family or S No Opinion 0 6 -6
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 0 6 -6
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair 31 37 -6
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Smith 3 9 -6
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 41 47 -6
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 33 39 -6
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Unfair 3 10 -6
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Jones 17 24 -7
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 55 62 -7
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Up 10 18 -7
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Not Very Helpful 7 15 -8
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 59 67 -8
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 6 14 -8
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 28 36 -8
36 Primary or Secondary Residenc Primary _ 90 98 -8
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 28 36 -8
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 45 54 -9
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 28 38 -10
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 10
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Cont: * Res: < 5 Years
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 38 49 -11
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mama Very Helpful 38 50 -12
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 6 19 -13
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 24 38 -14
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 17 31 -14
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 10 25 -15
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 38 70 -32
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 11
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Res: 5 to < 10
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
28 Is It Going Up Because of You Economy In General 73 51 22
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 47 27 20
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 36 25 11
38 Member of a Mobile Home owner No 60 51 9
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 28 19 9
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 70 62 8
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Unfair 19 12 7
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 15 8 7
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 39 32 7
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 33 26 7
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Somewhat Safe 33 26 7
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 42 36 6
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 37 31 6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 42 36 6
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Dissatisfied lY 6 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 48 54 -5
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 32 37 -5
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 59 65 -6
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mans Very Helpful 44 50 -6
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe 64 70 -6
•27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Staying The Same 9 15 -6
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 35 42 -7
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 42 49 -7
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 38 45 -7
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 58 65 -7
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 27 35 -8
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 38 47 -9
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 30 40 -10
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 66 76 -10
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied _ 56 67 -11-
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 31 43 -12
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 27 39 -12
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 39 52 -13
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 52 70 -18
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 12
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Res: 10 to < 15
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 83 51 33
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 29 14 15
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 48 38 11
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Unfair 24 14 10
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 30 19 10
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 71 62 9
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 52 43 9
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 31 23 8
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 73 65 8
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Unfair 16 9 7
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Unfair 19 12 7
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 37 31 7
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 24 17 7
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Fair 39 33 6
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 35 41 -5
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 21 26 -5
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 19 25 -5
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 71 76 -6
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 34 40 -6
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 50 56 -6
20 Appointments Available in Rea Yes 82 89 -6
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair 24 31 -7
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 31 38 -7
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 61 69 -8
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Up 10 18 -8
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 23 31 -8
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 18 26 -9
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 45 54 -9
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 17 39 -23
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 13
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Res: 15 to < 25
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 57 39 17
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 87 70 17
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No Opinion 10 1 9
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 48 40 8
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 74 67 8
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Difficult 10 4 6
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 60 54 6
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 42 37 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 14 19 -5
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Unfair 6 12 -5
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 57 62 -5
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 20 26 -6
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 17 25 -8
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 35 51 -16
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 60 76 -16
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 9 27 -18
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 14
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Res: 25+ Years
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 100 76 24
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 92 70 22
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 31 10 21
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 74 54 20
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 56 38 18
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 65 52 14
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair 50 37 13
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 67 54 13
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 52 40 12
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 59 49 11
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 45 35 10
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 58 47 10
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 47 38 9
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 52 43 9
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 50 42 9
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 53 45 8
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 83 76 8
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 33 26 7
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Up 24 18 6
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe 76 70 6
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 73 67 6
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mans Very Helpful 56 50 6
20 Appointments Available in Rea Yes 94 89 5
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / Yes Receiving 8 3 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included ************
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 0 6 -6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 2 8 -6
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair 24 31 -7
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 18 25 -7
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 30 37 -7
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 29 36 -7
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year = 15 23 -7-
,29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 62 69 -8
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 27 36 -8
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 11 19 -8
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 42 51 -9
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Unfair 3 12 -9
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 52 62 -10
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 21 32 -11
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Unfair 2 14 -12
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 44 56 -12
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 12 25 -13
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 0 14 -14
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 0 17 -17
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 11 31 -20
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 5 27 -22
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General _ 25 51 -26
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 15
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
*MHP: < 5 Years
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 50 27 24
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 43 25 18
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 71 54 18
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 82 65 17
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 67 51 16
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Somewhat Helpful 46 31 15
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 71 56 15
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair 43 31 12
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 54 42 12
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 46 35 11
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 36 25 10
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Fair 46 36 10
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Unacceptable 18 8 10
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 86 76 9
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 34 45 9
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up No Opinion 14 6 9
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Dissatisfied it 3 8
20 Appointments Available in Rea Yes 96 89 8
23 How Would You Renegotiate You Month-To-Month Lease 25 18 8
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 71 65 7
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Smith 18 11 7
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 18 11 7
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 54 47 6
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 25 19 6
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 46 41 •6
36 Primary or Secondary Residenc Secondary 7 1 6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 75 69 6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 57 52 6
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 43 37 6
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Refused 7 2 5
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 36 31 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included =*************
36 Primary or Secondary Residenc Primary 93 98 -5
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S No Opinion 0 6 -6
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, could Find 0 6 -6
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Smith 4 9 -6
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Jones 18 24 -6
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 33 39 -6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 13 19 -7
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 29 36 -7
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 25 32 -7
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 7 14 -7
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Up 11 18 -7
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 46 54 -8
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Fair 25 33 -8
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 14 23 -8
20 Appointments Available in Rea No _ 0 9 -9
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 57 67 -9
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 14 25 -11
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 25 36 -11
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 16
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Cont: *MHP: < 5 Years
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 39 51 -12
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 25 38 -13
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 25 38 -13
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 18 31 -13
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 36 50 -14
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 25 40 -15
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 29 49 -20
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 46 70 -24
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 17
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
MHP: 5 to < 10
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 47 27 21
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 68 51 18
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 40 25 15
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 28 19 9
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 59 51 8
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 15 8 7
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 63 56 7
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Dissatisfied 12 6 7
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 29 23 6
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 68 62 6
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Unfair 18 12 6
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Unfair 18 12 6
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 41 36 6
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 38 32 6
26 Subleasing of Mobile Homes In Favor 35 31 5
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 30 25 5
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 31 26 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 30 35 -5
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 45 50 -5
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving . 32 38 -5
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 60 65 -5
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 39 45 -6
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 46 54 -7
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 39 47 -z8
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 32 39 -8
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 66 76 -10 .
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 41 52 -10
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 32 43 -11
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 28 40 -12
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied _ 54 67 -13_
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 52 70 -18
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 18
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
MHP: 10 < 15
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 88 51 37
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 50 38 12
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 26 14 12
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 73 62 11
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Unfair 18 9 9
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 32 23 9
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Unfair 23 14 9
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 39 31 9
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 84 76 8
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 27 19 8
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 50 43 7
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Smith 17 11 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 30 36 -5
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 2'6 31 -5
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 21 26 -5
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Up 12 18 -6
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 35 41 -6
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 11 17 -6
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair 24 31 -7
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 35 42 -7
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mans Somewhat Helpful 24 31 -7
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa No Opinion 4 11 -7
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 30 38 -7
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 27 35 i8
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 47 56 -9
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 44 54 -10
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 13 39 -27
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 19
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
MHP: 15 to < 25
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 56 39 17
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 80 70 10
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 50 40 10
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 27 17 10
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 75 67 9
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa No Opinion 18 it 7
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 63 56 7
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 31 25 6
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 60 54 6
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No Opinion 7 1 6
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 19 25 -6
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 31 38 -6
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 20 26 -6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 12 19 -7
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 14 27 -12
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 60 76 -16
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 31 51 -19
d
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 20
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
MHP: 25+ Years
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 100 76 24
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 93 70 23
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 71 54 17
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 49 35 14
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 67 54 13
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 52 40 13
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 49 38 it
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 49 38 11
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 60 49 it
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 21 10 11
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Up 29 18 11
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 62 52 10
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 55 45 10
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 51 42 10
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 86 47 9
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mans Very Helpful 58 50 8
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 74 67 7
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair 44 37 7
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 33 26 7
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 82 76 7
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 46 39 6
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 49 43 6
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 46 41 6
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Unfair 4 9 -5
23 How Would You Renegotiate You Month-To-Month Lease 12 18 -6
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 0 6 -6
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 19 25 -6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 1 8 -7
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 25 32 -7
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 15 23 -7
37 Prefer- to Live in Family or S Family Park _ 12 19 -7-
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 62 69 -7
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 43 51 -8
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Unfair 2 12 -10
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Unfair 2 14 -11
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 12 25 -13
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 0 14 -14
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 40 56 -16
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 0 17 -17
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 33 51 -17
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 13 31 -17
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 44 62 -18
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 4 27 -23
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 21
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
No. In HH: One
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 67 54 13
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 82 70 12
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 15 6 9
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 33 25 8
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 82 76 7
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 58 52 6
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 43 38 5
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 54 49 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 17 23 -6
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 45 51 -6
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 50 56 -6
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 70 76 -6
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 24 31 -6
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 18 25 -7
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 11 19 -8
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 16 25 -9
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 15 27 -11
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 15 26 -12
v
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 22
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
No. In HH: Two
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 48 39 9
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S senior Park 81 76 6
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 30 36 -5
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 18 25 -7
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 42 51 -8
a
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 23
Huntington Beach, M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
No. In HH: 3+
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 100 51 49
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 65 19 46
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 65 27 39
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 55 25 30
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 49 25 24
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 76 56 19
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 49 31 18
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Somewhat Helpful 47 31 16
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 27 11 15
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 41 26 15
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 39 25 14
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 45 31 14
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 49 36 13
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 45 32 13
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair n 8 13
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 47 36 11
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Unacceptable 18 8 11
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 61 51 10
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Smith 18 9 9
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Acceptable 41 32 9
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 31 23 8
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 25 17 8
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 22 14 8
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Smith 18 11 7
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Unacceptable 16 10 j
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Unfair .18 12 6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 75 69 6 .
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 43 37 6
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Unacceptable 12 7 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In No Opinion 10 15 -5
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find _ 0 6 -6-
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe 63 70 -6
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Staying The Same 8 15 -6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 13 19 -7
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 27 38 -11
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 53 65 -11
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair 24 37 -12
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 35 47 -13
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 29 42 -13
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 37 50 -13
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 41 54 -13
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 49 65 -16
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 38 54 -16
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 18 38 -19
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied _ 47 67 -20
16 -Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 29 49 -20
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 20 41 -20
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 24 45 -20
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 31 52 -21
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 24
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Cont: No. In HH: 3+
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 16 40 -23
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 16 43 -26
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 0 39 -39
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 27 70 -43
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 31 76 -45
r
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 25
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
18-44
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 77 19 58
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 100 51 49
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 71 25 46
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 69 27 42
16 compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 51 25 26
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 60 36 24
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 80 56 24
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 74 51 23
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 51 31 21
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mans Somewhat Helpful 51 31 20
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 31 11 20
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 54 36 19
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 43 25 18
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 29 14 15
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Unfair 29 14 15
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 37 23 15
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Unfair 26 12 14
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Unfair 26 12 14
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 46 32 14
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 20 8 12
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay 3 Years To Less Than 5 14 3 12
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 37 26 11
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Acceptable 43 32 11
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Jones 34 24 11
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Unacceptable 20 10 11
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair 40 31 9
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Smith 20 11 9
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Unfair 17 10 7
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Unacceptable 14 8 7
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Unacceptable 14 8 7
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 37 31 6
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Dissatisfied _ 11 6 6
,20 Appointments Available in Rea No 14 9 6
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 43 37 6
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Unacceptable 17 12 5
23 How Would You Renegotiate You Month-To-Month Lease 23 18 5 .
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No Opinion Or Ref 9 4 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 0 6 -6
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe 63 70 -7
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 26 35 -9
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In No Opinion 6 15 -10
28 Is It Going Up Because of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Fair 26 36 -11
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 54 65 -11
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 14 25 -11
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose _ 43 54 -11
6 - Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 51 65 -13
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 38 54 -16
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 23 42 -19
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 17 38 -21
J
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 26
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Cont: 18-44
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mama Very Helpful 29 50 -21
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 26 47 -22
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 17 41 -23
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 43 67 -24
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 20 45 -25
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair it 37 -25
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 14 43 -28
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 20 49 -29
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 9 38 -29
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 20 52 -32
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 6 40 -34
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 0 39 -39
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 23 70 -47
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 20 76 -56
r
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 27
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
45-54
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 65 27 38
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 77 56 21
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 45 25 20
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 42 23 19
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 35 17 18
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 35 19 16
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Fair 48 33 15
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Unacceptable 23 8 15
20 Appointments Available in Rea No 23 9 14
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Unacceptable 19 7 13
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 42 31 11
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Smith 23 11 11
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 65 54 11
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 48 37 11
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 35 25 it
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 30 19 11
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay 10 Years To Less Than 15 13 3 10
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Unacceptable 13 4 9
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 16 8 8
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Not Very Helpful 23 15 8
9 Resolution of Problems Very Unacceptable 13 6 7
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 57 51 6
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 42 36 6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Unfair 10 3 6
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 32 26 1/0
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Somewhat Safe 32 26 6
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Unfair 6 12 -6
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In No Opinion 10 15 -6
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 19 25 -6
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 48 54 -6
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease _ 29 35 -6-
,23 How Would You Renegotiate You Month-To-Month Lease 10 18 -8
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair 23 31 -8
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe 61 70 -8
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 58 67 -8
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Unacceptable 3 12 -9
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 60 69 -9
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Acceptable 23 32 -9
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 55 65 -10
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 26 36 -10
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 32 43 -10
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 61 76 -14
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 35 50 -15
20 Appointments Available in Rea Yes 74 89 -15
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving _ 23 38 -15
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 60 76 -16
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 19 40 -20
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 35 70 -35
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 28
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
55-64
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 33 10 23
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 42 27 16
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mans Somewhat Helpful 46 31 15
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 91 76 14
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 56 43 13
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 75 65 10
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 21 11 10
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Smith 21 11 10
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair 40 31 10
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 33 25 8
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 69 62 7
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 44 37 7
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 58 51 7
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 38 32 6
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Fair 4-2 36 6
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 37 31 6
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 46 41 6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 25 19 6
23 How Would You Renegotiate You Month-To-Month Lease 23 18 6
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 32 26 5
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Unfair 10 5 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 33 38 -5
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In No Opinion 10 15 -6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa No Opinion 6 11 -:6
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Unfair 2 8 -6
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 33 39 -6
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Acceptable 25 32 -7
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 17 25 -8
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 42 50 -8
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 23 31 -8
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Up _ 6 18 -12_
:35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 5 17 -12
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 56 70 -14
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 19 36 -16
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 33 51 -17
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 29
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
65-74
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 71 54 17
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 83 69 14
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 19 6 13
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 38 26 12
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 50 40 10
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 45 36 10
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 78 70 8
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 38 32 6
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair 42 37 6
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 37 31 6
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 81 76 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Fair 28 33 -5
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa No Opinion 6 11 -5
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 60 65 -5
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 48 54 -6
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 37 43 -6
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 20 27 -6
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 22 31 -8
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In No Opinion 7 15 -9
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 11 19 -9
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 10 19 -9
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 5 14 -9
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 67 76 -10
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 30
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
75-84
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 100 76 24
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 73 54 19
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 88 70 18
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 90 76 15
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 59 47 12
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 48 38 10
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 61 52 9
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In No Opinion 24 15 9
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa No Opinion 18 11 6
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 72 67 6
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 48 43 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 32 37 -5
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 0 6 -6
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair 2-5 31 -6
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 19 25 -6
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 26 32 -6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 29 36 -7
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Smith 4 11 -7
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 28 36 -8
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Somewhat Helpful 23 31 -8
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 46 54 -9
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 16 25 -9
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 15 25 -10
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 59 69 -LI
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 46 56 -11
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 8 19 -11
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 39 51 -12
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 10 27 -17
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 0 17 -17
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 9 26 -17
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 31
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
85+
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 100 54 46
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 100 76 24
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 66 45 21
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 90 70 20
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 61 42 19
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 57 39 18
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 41 25 16
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 66 52 14
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mans Very Helpful 63 50 13
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 56 43 13
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 61 49 12
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 51 40 11
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 49 38 11
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 76 67 9
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 4.9 41 8
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 83 76 7
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 63 56 7
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair 44 37 7
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 61 54 7
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe 76 70 6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa No Opinion 17 11 6
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Staying The Same 20 15 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 2 8 -5
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Unfair 2 8 5
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 0 6 -6
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 56 62 -6
9 Resolution of Problems Very Unacceptable 0 6 -6
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 32 38 -6
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 5 11 -6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 29 36 -7
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Smith _ 2 9 -7-
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 17 25 -7
16 ` Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Unfair 0 9 -9
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Unfair 5 14 -9
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 10 19 -9
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Somewhat Helpful 22 31 -9
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Unacceptable 2 12 -9
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 9 19 -11
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 20 31 -11
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Jones 12 24 -12
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Unfair 0 12 -12
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 20 32 -12
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 10 23 -13
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 0 14 -14
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 0 17 -17
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home _ 5 25 -20
28 -Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 29 51 -22
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 2 27 -24
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 0 26 -26
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 32
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
Less Than $15K
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 80 54 26
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 85 70 15
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 89 76 13
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 48 38 10
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 60 51 9
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 33 25 9
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 28 19 8
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 33 25 8
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Unacceptable 15 7 8
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 50 43 7
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Unfair 19 12 7
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 46 40 7
20 Appointments Available in Rea No 15 9 6
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Dissatisfied 9 3 6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Unfair -9 3 6
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Somewhat Safe 31 26 5
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Jones 50 45 5
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In No Opinion 20 15 5
9 Resolution of Problems Very Unacceptable 11 6 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 35 41 -5
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 30 35 -5
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 64 69 -5
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 0 6 -6
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 48 54 ,6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Fair 30 36 -6
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 20 26 -6
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 19 25 -6
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Very Safe 63 70 -7
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair 24 31 -7
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Fair 26 33 -7
20 Appointments Available in Rea Yes = 81 89 -7-
.,23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 15 23 -8
.14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 30 38 -8
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 30 39 -9
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 15 25 -10
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 44 56 -12
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 30 42 -12
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 6 19 -13
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 0 14 -14
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 52 67 -15
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 9 27 -17
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 33
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
$15K to $25K
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 57 38 19
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Acceptable 49 32 17
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 22 6 17
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 67 54 13
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 79 67 13
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 82 69 13
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 60 49 12
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Down 74 62 12
33 Rent, own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 81 70 it
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 20 10 10
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 60 51 9
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 40 31 9
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Fair 42 33 9
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 47 40 7
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Unacceptable 19 12 7
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 58 52 7
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 42 35 7
26 Subleasing of Mobile Homes In Oppose 60 54 6
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 38 32 6
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 81 76 6
20 Appointments Available in Rea Yes 94 89 6
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Fair 42 36 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 38 43 -5
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Smith 4 9 -5
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Dissatisfied 0 6 -6
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 17 23 -6
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Unacceptable 2 8 -6
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 2 8 -6
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 11 17 -6
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa No Opinion 5 11 -6
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair _ 25 31 -6_
,29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 13 19 -7
.31 ' How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 4 it -7
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Unfair 6 14 -8
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Up 9 18 -8
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 57 65 -8
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 17 27 -10
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 67 76 -10
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park. 20 39 -19
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 36 56 -20
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 34
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
$25K to $35K
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 78 67 12
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 51 40 12
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 49 38 11
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 76 65 11
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 62 52 11
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 50 39 11
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Fair 46 36 10
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 57 49 8
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 27 19 8
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Easy 33 26 7
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 43 37 6
23 How Would You Renegotiate You One-Year Lease 41 35 6
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find it 6 5
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 59 54 5
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 41 36 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 3 8 -5
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / No, Could Not Find 11 17 -6
23 How Would You Renegotiate You Month-To-Month Lease 11 18 -7
27 Is Your Mobile Home Going Up Going Up 11 18 -7
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Jones 16 24 -8
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 68 76 -8
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 16 25 -8
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 16 25 -9
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 22 31 79
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Fair 22 33 -11
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 43 56 -13
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Acceptable 19 32 -13
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 35
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
$35K to $50K
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 100 51 49
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 55 27 28
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 43 19 24
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Somewhat Helpful 50 31 19
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Unfair 29 12 17
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 69 56 13
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Somewhat Difficult 26 14 12
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 36 25 11
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 21 11 10
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Somewhat Like Jones 33 24 10
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay 3 Years To Less Than 5 12 3 9
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Unacceptable 17 8 9
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 33 25 9
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 78 69 8
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 33 25 8
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Unacceptable 12 4 8
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Somewhat Unfair 21 14 8
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Very Fair 40 33 7
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 43 36 7
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 33 26 7
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Acceptable 38 32 6
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Acceptable 38 32 6
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 29 23 6
20 Appointments Available in Rea No 14 9 6
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Favor 36 31 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
20 Appointments Available in Rea Yes 83 89 -5
9 Resolution of Problems Very Acceptable 36 42 -6
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 70 76 -7
13 How Safe Is Your Mobile Home Somewhat Safe 19 26 -7
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 40 49 -8
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In No Opinion _ 7 15 -8
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair 29 37 -8
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 11 19 -8
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 17 25 -8
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 29 38 -9
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 29 38 -9
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Acceptable 31 41 -10
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 0 10 -10
34 How Easy Or Difficult Was Fin Very Easy 43 54 -10
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home 29 40 -11
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 38 50 -12
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 52 67 -14
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 29 43 -14
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 50 65 -15
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 52 76 -23
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 45. 70 -25
28 -Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 0 39 -39
Lawrence Research GROUPTABS Page 36
Huntington Beach M.H.P. / Oct. 1997 6674
$50K or More
Question Answer(s) Grp Agg Diff
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Paying Mortgage 66 27 39
32 What Type Of Residence Would Single Family Detached Home 52 25 27
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Family Park 36 19 17
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Somewhat Fair 55 37 17
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P No, Unaware 73 56 16
23 How Would You Renegotiate You More Than One-Year 39 23 16
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Economy In General 67 51 16
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Somewhat Unfair 23 8 15
7 Facilities and Amenities Very Acceptable 77 65 12
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Fair 36 25 11
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner No 61 51 10
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Somewhat Satisfied 34 25 10
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Mobile Home Park 29 19 9
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay Less Than 3 Years 20 11 9
9 Resolution of Problems Somewhat Unacceptable 18 10 9
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Not Very Helpful 23 15 8
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Somewhat Acceptable 43 36 8
20 Appointments Available in Rea No 16 9 7
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Somewhat Unfair 16 9 7
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In Oppose 61 54 7
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Very Unacceptable 14 7 7
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You No Opinion 17 10 7
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Unfair 18 12 7
21 Smith Feels Partiality / Jone Strongly Like Smith 16 9 7
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv No 83 76 W6
31 How Long Do You Plan To Stay 10 Years To Less Than 15 9 3 6
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Somewhat Acceptable 32 26 6
17 How Fair Are The Costs Of Rep Somewhat Fair 36 31 6
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Somewhat Helpful 36 31 5
************* Range of 5 Points High to 5 Points Low not included *************
35 Found Refinancing in Last Fiv Yes / Yes, Could Find 0 6 -6
8 Procedures For Making Rules F Somewhat Acceptable _ 25 32 -7-
6 Park Maintenance and Repairs Very Acceptable 57 65 -8
38 Member of a Mobile Home Owner Yes 39 47 -9
29 Going Down Because Of Your Pa Economy In General 61 69 -9
19 How Helpful Would Owners/Mana Very Helpful 41 50 -9
16 Compared To Cost Of Housing I Very Fair 39 49 -10
30 Heard Of/Receive Assistance P Yes, Aware / No, Not Receiving 27 38 -10
14 How Fair Is Your Rent Very Fair 27 38 -10
26 Subleasing Of Mobile Homes In No Opinion 5 15 =11
10 Enforcement of Rules and Regu Very Acceptable 32 43 -11
3 Satisfaction With Mobile Home Very Satisfied 55 67 -12
7 Facilities and Amenities Somewhat Acceptable 18 31 -13
18 How Fair Are The Park Rules Very Fair 39 52 -13
23 How Would You Renegotiate You No Opinion 9 25 -16
15 Compared to Amenities in Park Very Fair 20 37 -16
37 Prefer to Live in Family or S Senior Park 57 76 -19
32 What Type Of Residence Would Mobile Home - 18 40 -22
28 Is It Going Up Because Of You Mobile Home Park 17 39 -23
33 Rent, Own Free and Clear or M Free and Clear 32 70 -38
MANUFACTUR D HOUSINu RECEIVED
EDUCATIQN L TRUST CITY CLERK
Orange, Riverside and San�Bernardino Count'�iG#I CITY OF
TiNGTON LEACH,CALIF,
BOARD OF I WS M "^" 09
VMCU.TW,; BOARD
Prtsidcnt . . .
II)yea Jones
N,t Prcridant
lm Iardct March 2, 1998
W r Praridant
ohn Davis
• Sccrsua:
Che a Travlesrya
Pat I gtwlck Honorable Mayor Shirley Dettloff
Clarke 1 airbrother Members of the City Council
Cr 1g Houser City of Huntington Beach
tan Magill 2000 Main Street
w Gee Miller Huntington Beach,CA 92648
hm Sccor RE. Mobile Home Owner Letters to City Council
BOARD I MANS US
Bc 5 Bcndctti Honorable Mayor Shirley Dettloff and Members of the City Council;
Hovral�13cigham
Ar,o Chauvel At the February 23, 1998 Mobile Home Review Board meeting six letters
r:ikc eirillo from Huntington Beach mobile home owners were included in the Agenda
Jack 1>uckworth Packet. It is our understanding that the Council has received additional letters
Strpl;,:I Esslingen over the past weeks.
Ja o'eening It is not surprising that these letters are now being sent to you, not by the
Dan Jacobs authors of the letters, but by HBMOA Officers forwarding them to you after
Jerr t Jacobson they spent over a year requesting mobile home owners write letters and
Jim Jones "cherry picking"the letters that best suit their current needs. Note that each of
Clint 1AU the letters you received (copies attached) are all dated in early 1997 and not
Job i Uttlewn addressed to the City Council. Also attached for your information is a
Tor, Matreyek February 12, 1997 article by HBTM0A urging that letters be written, Every
lawrenc;McAdoo letter received by the Council was written at the urging of HBMOA with the
Bi 1 Mechatn promise of lower rents. The fact that so few letters were written by mobile
B:tty Miter home owners, even after months of pleading by I•iBMOA (see meeting
Xck New notices attached) reflects the park residents' satisfaction and validates the
Bob ?lander II findings of the Lawrence Survey. According to Dan Bruenings' report to the
' Dcu i Panchcri Mobile Home Review Board on February 23, 1998, sixteen letters had been
Gene$ica received. those residents represent less than one half of one percent of all
mobile home spaces in the sixteen rental parks in the City!
.Z:'xecNti,e Direuor
V::kie Tallcy It is obvious that I•IBMOA is concerned that the incredibly positive outcome
Renal Anktance of the October 1997 mobile home owner surveyconducted for the City by
Ellen Mn dmno Lawrence Research will hurt their efforts to brin rent control to the City of
(714)035.1952 Huntington Beach. A quick look at the results shows that 74% - 75% of the
�600 ri.State Cc;lege I3lvc1 residents surveyed felt their rent is fair, especially when compared with the
IVite 1020 cost of other housing in Huntington Beach. It is obvious that the few
Orange,Calitor da 92668 selected letters don't represent the majority of Huntington Beach mobile home
Phoac (714)935-1900 owners.
FAX (714)935.1145
Mobile Hot to Hotline
(800)616•0064
Serving the Maq#factured Housin 12;4urtry Since 1982 � ,
MAR- 2-98 MON 11 :38 FAX NO, 123456789 P. 02
We encourage you to listen very carefully when Dr. Lawrence gives his report
tonight. He will tell you that the survey reflects an error margin of less than
5% on responses higher than 60%, An overwhelming majority of Huntington
Beach mobile hotrre park residents feel their rent is fair. This is the "silent
majority"of over 90% who responded that they like mobile home park living
and are very satisfied with their housing choice, There are probably few other
neighborhoods in the City that would be ranked as high.
Once you have reviewed the entire survey and hear Dr. Lawrence's report Y
think you will be pleased to realize, and confident, that Huntington Beach
mobile home owners feel that they are treated fairly and have nice
communities in which to live. We urge you to listen to the voice of the
majority as represented in the independent, objective survey you
commissioned for the purpose of assisting you in making informed decisions
about mobile home parks in the City.
Thank you and, as always, if,I or any mobile home community owner can be
of assistance in any way,please don't hesitate to give me a call.
Sincerely,
Vickie Talley
)executive Director
cc Huntington Beach Mobile Home Community Owners
Attachments: 1ebruary-12, 1997 News clip (send letters)
February 4, 1997 HBMOA Meeting Notice (do not send
letters to City Hall)
April 1, 1997 HBMOA Meeting Notice (send more letters)
Sample Letters All addressed to HBMOA,all dated 1997
M6R- 2-98 MON 11 :39 FAX NO, 1 PAW89 P. 03
. - .fairness Issues
J73
Smw Vry No
Ar>� Unf Unf pin
In c,Ieneral, is your rent ... ?4Z14 12 1
1n ;(;omparison to the amenities provided by 75% 12 1.0 4-
yoL r park, i ' '' ' ' r rent
ln ,t;o[npis4n to the cost of other housing `74-?0 49 25 S.
6 2
in t luntinQton Beach, is your rent ...
Are the,Gosts'of repairs that are passed �'ro 33 31 8 5 24
alai ig' tv you -
Ar!,0 are the park rules ,,. >o 52 36 8 3 2
Os. 14-1 B
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana/ Octobet '97/ #6674
r- MAR- 2-98 MON 11 : FAX NO 123 6789 P. 04
39 �t
NEW
1
<Clusivej,t for the N1,04 lehorne Qwner
February 1 2, 1997
2161 r., d rove, Cal,. 92641
" 1 ffuntwgfton ]beach
Mo' ' boe Nome Owners
Say "We've Had It"
3 by Steve ,QuNge, President Huntington Beach
t N,iobiile. liome Owner's Association
For the past three years, the cry for rent protection
,i has been heard 'i.n Huntington Beach. For this reason,
the Huntington Beach Mobile Home Owner's Associa- .
bon was're-ot nixed to answer the call for fair rents.
Bqt, we need proof to take to City Hall, that you need a
Rent Protection Ordinance, The Ordinance part is easy
(we already have that) the important part is proving to
City 14all that it is needed in Huntington Beach, That's
where ,all of -you come in. When you have finished '
madirig this paper, pick up your pen, or sit dmo n at
yqur typewrite.r,'and draft a letter stating your reasons
why you, the. Mobile Hone Owners of Huntington
Beach, need Rent �rotection. Your letters are of para-
mount import4nce in this effort to obtain "Fair Rents",
ryd will prose to our City Leaders that this is not Just a
lonely cry in the 'Wilderness, but a united effort to prove
the need'for Rent Protection in the City of Huntington
Beach Mobile Wme Community,
Address your letters to: Rent Protection,
K.B.M.O.,A., P.O, Box 7975, Huntington Beach, CA
92615.
o not send your letter to the City of Huntington
Beach;
This could be, the best thirty-two cents you e�-er ;
spent! '
MAR- 2-98 MON 11 -40 FAX NO. 12WW89 P. 05
: HBMOA
Working for,all Mobilehome Owners in the City
All Mobilehome Owners are welcome
Tuesday, February 4, 1997 at 7:00 PM
City Hall...LQwer Level...Room B6
AlUT '.NG AGENDA
• RENT CONTROL
• Dispute Resolution Policy
In April of 19•,03, a group of six mobilehome owners met for the purpose of re-activating the
Hunjl lgtoh Belch Mobilehome Owners Association. The mission of this"core group"was to.form a city wide
a,$4 jatldji, with members from all nineteen parks..,United,we could have a louder voice at City Hall.
Unit?f,wp Gould elect members to the CityCoupcil who would recognize our political power. We proved i1
Burin;l the Last two 'elaelion6, '
l The city council established what has become a permanent Mobile Home Advisory Board. We
wane d tG sit down with,Park Owners to eliminate intimidation and violation of the Mobilehome Residency
Law., tC01hbmIC justioo,Is ot,r'$oaI'theough'Resident Owned Parks QRR Rent Protection that would preserve
the of'ordability as well as our investment,while making sure that the park owners get a FAIR RETURN on .
th�elri 14s'tm4rit. Noy►is•thp time for action!!! Our Rent Protection Ordinance is completed, with
adn*istrative instructions end a plan 1q generate reyenue for the City of Huntington Beach.
V1 a cannot move,forWard tf you do not support this effort. We want to prove to the City that W ,.•. .
need' 'ent prot,eotion,to'preserve our homes. PLEASt COME TO THE MEETING NEXT TOESDAY and .
ans i Y the nail to;R06. We need`letters from every,mobilehome owner in the City telling us why you need
rent p ple�tion,. ;It"wiil only cost you 32 cents and less than an hour of your time. Do not send your letters to
City�all. Send hem to':
HBMOA
V'O. Box 7975
Huntington Beach, CA 92615
If you are not;a member,fill out the form below and send$5,00 per member with your letter. If you
haven t pald your annual dues, please sent it today, We need your support. Send your letter today whether
or noj yoU:a?e a niembet.
HUN;'INOTON BEACH .MQBIL�,HOM� OWNERS ASSOCIATION Office Use only
P. I, pX 7975' Phone: (714) 960-6050 FAX: (714) 536-2708 Member#1
HQNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615 Member#z_T_._.�_
. 11�lember hip Application (New.f�enewai..�.) Am[ Pd�,
NAME,:' • DATE: Cash
CO-AP kICANT'S NAME Check .-
PAHK;.�AME:
Checks •
ADDRESS: SP # NUM..�_j___
CITY:. STATE: ZIP_ NAM,—J j_ ;
F B> ;UA.RY„07 Membershl F e is $5.00 per MEMBER eer xear
.uu• VV uvn a a -ii lfl(I llvi 1LJ-tJV IVV ! . VV.
KintingtOn beach Mobilehome Owners Association
H B M 0 A
Tuesday, April 1, 197.at 7:00 PM
fit H II...Lower Level...Room B6
MEETING AGENDA
• s Rules and Regulations
$ WE STILL NEED MORE LETTERS . .
' ,The respbIlte has been good, but we need more participation from ALL of
you.f }ielp your 6ighbpt write a letter or short note on why rent protection is
need rd, We ark teddy to move forward and need your support now. We can only
Acc�,hplish this i6sk'with a total combined effort.
We"mu'st prove to the City that WE need rent protection to preserve OUR
- homes. Pl,�ASE 00ME TO THE METING NEXT TUESDAY and answer the call
to a ,We Ga'6't emphasize .enough how important your letters will be to this
effori send your, Ietters to:
HBMOA
P. O. Box 7975
.Huntington Beach, CA 92615
Foi your information, the pork Owners have already started lobbying City Hall.
i. If you ire not,a member,;fill out the form below and send $5.00 per applicant
to jQin' H$MQA,.''if you haven,'t paid your annual dues, please send them today!
We n red your,s00pprt. Send your letter whether or not you are a member.
HU ITING`�UN, BEACH M0,13UHOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION Off if,' use oni�r
P, , 8QX 7975 PhOne: (114) 96Q-5050 FAX: (714) 536.2708 Member#1
H'QNTINGTON BEACH, CA*92615 Member#2T�„,
E M mb Irshlp Appjica fOn ()Vew Renewal }
10
Check
NAM!:: .—DATE:GATE: Cash
CQ- PPLICANt8 NAME:
PAR : NAMI�,,
Check#�
NUM "!�—
.. sP #:
CITY' - - - ' J
...-.-STATE:�Z!P:_ NAM. _
f_
PHQ,r iE:
PR7��Membership Fee is $5.00 per MEM�FR per year LTR^...../.—
Win- c-00 I-lull 11 •41 rHA IYU. 1Lj4D010o r. U I
ir
' M .3' :ice +•��. i
tiff••' ,I 't: .4•• .., - - — r� -- 77 - ...
• '"•' ;( ;: .tiff.^ .::. --- � -- — - -----' -•r•--^�-_,:i�-,:.—r:.
�u.J. ,.r .��;fr:r t`.:�; • ''t•':?'-• •,t��' r•�, '3J %.•.2-'t.+ •.r^ •y'w%•::•• .?.. •�. `.•1};:�
.;y f.t '�° .�.T.,.• .i.,�%''' Wit: %� <J. �:" t.. .'
• ,'i� �' '3' :,j, - •,.µ. fS••• � _ •�"• •r.•• a _''��+ y � �•,.,"'i•�.
• `�, ,` ,f:r}•, •:,t •r•; ,•', .,t..,l :i.•. ..r t�•. '.t`_•"+�•:I�•�• •.•.:• ;`p Y:,1;:w•'"j.;y.'.:
. 'i,•� .i, •!••`:.i`n.•" ;+ .+' .••'• �1: +��,t 1 - ... ,.r ••i•. S,•�,.Y• 't•. .+•.e••`�%::i:�•,ti�•S,•,
:•.N•• •.�•••�r. �:�•'J.?'r..i•r 1� - r `•_+ .1'1•�. .'. .'1:••• iaiti •�c.','y ..1....::..�.•+.-'.; :�y.. ..�:%:1
'� ••1••..' •.I,: - •••' .T.- '.y'�p• fir:,,'•C��••' 1,6 _ %I, ,,.ia. ham_!,
••!•.1.,'. •?ri ••�., .i.Sr '.hy •� :\'Cl.i .. 'ar'!' ate.':c' :N�; '� -i.'+ t'.• �• 'y 1'i•'' �T:
-Ti a•: - .tie.,. .��;'..c' ;I,j,�
UJ-UZ-H 1U: 15AM MUM 111, TU 1;11Y ULL'Klt r U I
RECEIVED
City CLERK
CITY OF
HUNTINGTOH REACH-CALIF.
Mai �i QM '9$ V
February 28, 1998
David Sullivan
2000 Main St.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Council Member Sullivan:
It has been brought to my attention that City Council will be discussing the results of the
Lawrence Research Telephone Survey of Mobile Home Park Residents at the next city
council meeting. You need to know that there are gross errors in the sample population
for this survey;
1) The survey neglected to include residents of Huntington Mobile Estates and
Beachview Mobile Home Park. The exclusion of these two parks raises serious
doubts to the validity of the survey results. You may also be interested to know
that these two parks have frequently appeared as agenda items at the Mobile
Home Advisory Board due to poorly maintained park facilities and unresponsive
park management.
2) 41% of the total sample size and 45% of the responses were obtained from three
mobile home parks (Rancho Del Rey, Huntington by the Sea, & Los
Amigos/Rancho Huntington). These three parks just happen to be the same parks
whose owners are represented on the Huntington Beach Advisory Board.
3) 64% of the respondents were over the age of 65 and only 9% of the respondents
were under the age of 45. This indicates that the survey does a poor job of
evaluating family parks,
At first glance one would look at the survey results and conclude there are no serious
problems in the mobile home community within our city. I can honestly say that this
survey does not in any way represent the views and opinions of myself or the residents of
Huntington Mobile Estates. As a community volunteer and member of the Huntington
Beach Advisory Board, I am appalled and disgusted that this survey was performed in a
manner that does not reflect the true environment of Huntington Beach's mobile home
community,
Respectfully yours,
Thomas K. Sobek
cc; Mayor, Shirley Detloff
City Council Members
HBAB Members
HBMQA t
MANUFACTURED HOUSING
_y. EDUCATIONAL TRUST
Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
EXECUTIVE BOARD
President
Boyce Jones
Via President RECEIVED FROM
Jim Martin March 2, 1998 AND MADE A PART OF THE REC.gRD2 T
Via President COUNCIL MEETING OF
John Davis . OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CONNIE BROCKWAY,CITY CLERK
Secretary
Chelu Travieso
Treasurer Honorable Mayor Shirleyettloff
Paul Bostwick Y y
Clarke Fairbrother Members of the City Council
Craig Houser City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Stan Magill Huntington Beach, CA 92648
W.Lee Miller
Pam Secor RE: Mobile Home Owner Letters to City Council
BOARD MEMBERS
Bob Bendetti Honorable Mayor Shirley Dettloff and Members of the City Council:
Howard Brigharq
Arno Chauvel At the February 23, 1998 Mobile Home Review Board meeting six letters
Mike Grillo from Huntington Beach mobile home owners were included in the Agenda
Jack Duckworth Packet. It is our understanding that the Council has received additional letters
Stephen Essfinger over the past weeks.
Jay Greening
Dan Jacobs It is not surprising that these letters are now being sent to you, not by the
authors of the letters, but by HBMOA Officers forwarding them to you after
Jerry Jacobson they spent over a year requesting mobile home owners write letters and
Jim Jones '°cherry picking"the letters that best suit their current needs. Note that each of
Clint Lau the letters you received (copies attached) are all dated in early 1997 and not
John Littleton addressed to the City Council. Also attached for your information is a
Tom Matreyek February 12, 1997 article by HBMOA urging that letters be written. Every
Lawrence McAdoo letter received by the Council was written at the urging of HBMOA with the
Bill Mecham promise of lower rents. The fact that so few letters were written by mobile
Betty Miller home owners, even after months of pleading by HBMOA (see meeting
Dick Nerio notices attached) reflects the park residents' satisfaction and validates the
Bob Olander II findings of the Lawrence Survey. According to Dan Bruenings' report to the
Deann Panchen Mobile Home Review Board on February 23, 1998, sixteen letters had been
Gene Pica received. those residents represent less than one half of one percent of all
mobile home spaces in the sixteen rental parks in the City!
Executive Director
Vickie Talley It is obvious that HBMOA is concerned that the incredibly positive outcome
Ren
tal iniAssstra ce
or of the October 1997 mobile home owner survey conducted for the City by
Administrator
Ellen Friedmann Lawrence Research will hurt their efforts to bring rent control to the City of
(714)935-1952 Huntington Beach. A quick look at the results shows that 74% - 75% of the
500 N.State College Blvd. residents surveyed felt their rent is fair, especially when compared with the
Suite 1020 cost of other housing in Huntington Beach. It is obvious that the few
Orange,California 92668 selected letters don't represent the majority of Huntington Beach mobile home
Phone .(714)935-1900 owners.
FAX (714)935-1145
Mobile Home Hotline /
(800)616-0064
_ _ Serving the Manufactured Housing.In4ustry Since 1982 ¢
We encourage you to listen very carefully when Dr. Lawrence gives his report
tonight. He will tell you that the survey reflects an error margin of less than
5% on responses higher than 60%. An overwhelming majority of Huntington
Beach mobile home park residents feel their rent is fair. This is the "silent
majority" of over 90% who responded that they like mobile home park living
and are very satisfied with their housing choice. There are probably few other
neighborhoods in the City that would be ranked as high.
Once you have reviewed the entire survey and hear Dr. Lawrence's report I
think you will be pleased to realize, and confident, that Huntington Beach
mobile home owners feel that they are treated fairly and have nice
communities in which to live. We urge you to listen to the voice of the
majority as represented in the independent, objective survey you
commissioned for the purpose of assisting you in making informed decisions
about mobile home parks in the City.
Thank you and, as always, if I or any mobile home community owner can be
of assistance in any way,please don't hesitate to give me a call.
Sincerely,
Vickie Talley
Executive Director
cc Huntington Beach Mobile Home Community Owners
Attachments: February 12, 1997 News clip (send letters)
February 4, 1997 HBMOA Meeting Notice (do not send
letters to City Hall)
April 1, 1997 HBMOA Meeting Notice (send more letters)
Sample Letters All addressed to HBMOA, all dated 1997
7
- Fairness Issues
TO"t- Vry Smw Smw Vry No
FAfI- Fair Fair Unf Unf Opin
In general, is your rent ... -74?o 38 36 14 T2 1-
In comparison to the amenities provided by 757b 37 38 12 10 4-
your park, is�_your rent ...
1n comparison to the cost of other housing -7 f?a 49 25 9 6 2
_in Huntington Beach, is your rent ...
Are the costs of repairs that are passed 64�0 33 31 8 5 24
along to you ... �—
And are the park rules ... 6870 52 36 8 3 2
Qs. 14-18
Lawrence Research /Santa Ana / October '97/ #6674
p D
JI- Aim
r�
:elusively for the Mobilehome Owner
February 12, 1997
2161 Garden Grove, Cal. 92641
- Huntington Beach
i Mobile Horne Owners
Say "'we've Had It"
> by Steve Gullage, President Huntington Beach
t . Mobile Home Owner's Association
For the past three years, the cry for rent protection
i has been heard in Huntington Beach. For this reason,
the Huntington Beach Mobile Home Owner's Associa- .
don was re-organized to answer the call for fair rents.
But, we need proof to take to City Hall, that you need a
Rent Protection Ordinance. The Ordinance part is easy
(we already have that) the important part is proving to
City Hall that it is needed in Huntington Beach. That's
where all of you come in. When you have finished
reading this paper, pick up your pen, or sit down at
your typewriter, and draft a letter stating your reasons
why you, the Mobile Home Owners of Huntington
Beach, need Rent Protection. Your letters are of para-
mount importance in this effort to obtain "Fair Rents",
and will prove to our City Leaders that this is not just a
lonely cry in the wilderness, but a united effort to prove
the need for Rent Protection in the City of Huntington
Beach Mobile Home Community.
Address your letters to: Rent Protection,
H.B.M.O.A., P.O. Box 7975, Huntington Beach, CA
92615.
Do not send your letter to the City of Huntington
Beach.
This could be the best thirty-two cents you ever
spent!
t. F
HBMOA
Working for all Mobilehome Owners in the City
All Mobilehome Owners are welcome
Tuesday, February 4, 1997 at 7:00 PM
City Hall...Lower Level...Room 136 -
MEETING AGENDA
• RENT CONTROL
• Dispute Resolution Policy
In April of 1993, a group of six mobilehome owners met for the purpose of re-activating the
Huntington Beach Mobilehome Owners Association. The mission of this "core group" was to form a city wide
association, with members from all nineteen parks. United, we could have a louder voice at City Hall.
United,we could elect members to the City Council who would recognize our political power. We proved it
during the last two elections.
The City Council established what has become a permanent Mobile Home Advisory Board. We
wanted to sit down with Park Owners to eliminate intimidation and violation of the Mobilehome Residency
Law. Economic justice is our goal through Resident Owned Parks OR Rent Protection that would preserve . .
the affordability as well as our investment, while making sure that the park owners get a FAIR RETURN on
their investment. Now is-the time for action!!! Our Rent Protection Ordinance is completed, with
administrative instructions and a plan to generate revenue for the City of Huntington Beach.
We cannot move forward if you do not support this effort. We want to prove to the City that WE
need rent protection to preserve our homes. PLEASE COME TO THE MEETING NEXT TUESDAY and
answer the call to arms. We need letters from every mobilehome owner in the City telling us why you need
rent protection. It will only cost you 32 cents and less than an hour of your time. Do not send your letters to
City Hall. Send them to:
HBMOA
P. 0. Box 7975
Huntington Beach, CA 92615
If you are not a member, fill out the form below and send$5.00 per member with your letter. If you
haven't paid your annual dues, please send it today. We need your support. Send your letter today whether
or not you are a member.
HUNTINGTON BEACH MOBILEHOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION office use only
P. 0. BOX 7975 Phone (714) 960-5050 FAX: (714) 536-2708 Member#1
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615 Member#2
Membership Application (New Renewal ) Amt Pd
NAME: DATE: Cash
CO-APPLICANT'S NAME Check
PARK NAME: Check#
ADDRESS: SP # NUM /v
CITY: STATE: ZIP NAM /_
PHONE : PCF /_
FEBRUARY 97)-Membership Fee is $5.00 perMEMBER per year LTR i i
Y
Huntington Beach �/lobilehome Owners Association
HBMOA
Tuesday, April 1, 1997.at 7:00 PM
City Hall...Lower Level...Room B6
MEETING AGENDA
• Rules and Regulations
LETTERS . . . WE STILL NEED MORE LETTERS . . .
The response has been good, but we need more participation from ALL of
you. Help your neighbor write a letter.or short note on why rent protection is
needed. We are ready to move forward and need your support now. We can only
accomplish this task with a total combined effort.
We must prove to the City that WE need rent protection to preserve OUR
homes. PLEASE COME TO THE MEETING NEXT TUESDAY and answer the call
to arms. We can't emphasize enough how important your letters will be to this
effort. Send your letters to:
HBMOA
P. O. Box 7975
Huntington Beach, CA 92615
For your information, the park Owners have already started lobbying City Hall.
If you are not a member, fill out the form below and send $5.00 per applicant
to join HBMOA. If .you haven't paid your annual dues, please send them today!
We need your support. Send your letter whether or not you are a member.
HUNTINGTON BEACH MOBILEHOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION office use only
P. O. BOX 7975 Phone: (714) 960-5050 FAX: (714) 536-2708 Member#t
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615 Member#2
Membership Application (New Renewal ) Amt Pd
NAME: DATE: Cash
CO-APPLICANT'S NAME: Check
PARK NAME:4 Check#
ADDRESS: SP #: NUM
CITY: STATE: ZIP: NAM /_
PHONE: _ PCF
APRIL 97 Membershi Fee is $5.00 perMEMBER per ear LTR i i
f �
r
O
47
pv�l
222
r t., t v
f
I q FEf , 9
u� 1, n ,v J -
1
1
RE. REr�rt�Ro �=�
z',�
4 6 ty
4:4-
.March 18 , 1997
10 �
.�161
P. 0. Box 7975
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92615
Dear Mr . Gulledge :
I am a senior citizen who is living (or trying to live) on
Social Security.
I am living in a mobile home park that is constantly
raising the rents .
We definitely need your help in trying to establish
rent controls on mobile home parks .
Yours truly,
Illy
t c/7 91� .
(77
_L
to
S��✓F� 7'kAs� .
/ 00
Lqa, �5) a
T91
q 14 9 -L
(� (� to �� ,r,►1, -��-e .�,
VII
lit/ �� ,c,� �•�,-v—�—�'� � �� �v� 71l `'' " " �,�C ��,
6301 darner Ave. , Sp ,.459
Huntington...Beach, CA 92647
March 13, 1997
Membership 94050394
Huntington Beach Mobile Home Owner 's Assoc.
P .C. Box 7975
Huntington Beach, CA 92615
Dear Sirs :
I live in the Sea Aira Mobile Park and with the rents increasing
as they are, all Seniors like myself in the Park are finding it
more difficult each year to meet the increases for the land rental.
-le sincerely hope that something can be done.
Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
Mary R . Travis
is - 9 ;7
D E i
1 ` 1 ' f� �� �✓s��N /
C C�
l
G� �a �.✓��,�.�.Qom.
f� -
�Ltiu Gam' .��Zl� .S?/✓�-�%�- ��-�-� �2-��,.[�,�,�
lJ
t j
r
y �
/l'I a-Z3 /L h'orN�
f l�i� P_v P�� f�� S 7
l/e
q�ar 71- k,�"P/1�
?"D Cc {'�D�i� �'�D�� ��r�- LIP✓'e l"'CPi✓7�L�' �'� 7
/O C u 7 e r�'�/ �"w v �cl cJ �►��r� %n �X �S�A Cx�- /
-Fee.
re
�0.01z-. tom �9�1t
/Y) R E C E V ED
I A
8
igton Beach
cil Office
i. Cz i1 .ti
- //,, '' • - •' C,u��(` .��.�.��.�'.v.��/� �;/./.ten.L
(/
1� 411�
�x Ll1v �f.C�✓�� tZ
rs
ot
Pw
�, u�•i� CUr� ��vy����
t
a e t /�
------- ------ ------ ---- c --- - - -=—
_
-kt-� 7- A C-zc-
ht
AL.c
0-u-Ec-
r -
)�p 4-
rA
�f
I
Qom. Q 7��7S
�`� •c-�.cl�Jv �-z�� .Gi-�-z�se> �' � ll��--�'1-' cti-�"`"�a..� ��-� ti-�c �-.�.d��
�/Z[:�,�c.�...�f. �/�-�Y�-'�-�-_ `-� B.•`c� �`L,�• ' . O - c'-e.GU ..�.�-e''.c. c�-.�clC.
(YL �C_C1� G— > /�►-t��/c 2��� / =—CC .,/
CR-�hl c.-
Ir
de
-
�'�
E , EIVED
J AN 16 1998
�r Huntington Beach
Council Office
tax-,, -
J A N 16 1998
City of Huntingz n 80-ach
City Council Office
_ a 057
lyo �-
go. (dfl-, 797.5
U
,tom'
JA N 16 1998
City of Huntington Beach
Ci `
ty Council Offill
May 6, 1997
HBMOA
PO Box 7975
Huntington Beach, CA 92615
To Whom It May Concern:
I live in a mobile home park in Huntington Beach and if rents continue to rise I will be
forced to move and go back to renting an apartment. I am a single mother with limited
income, but my dream was to own a home of my own. I shared a one bedroom condo.
with my daughter for years until I was able to buy a 2 bedroom mobile home. I would
never been able to buy a house that was out of my reach. It's a struggle at times to pay
the space rent and a mortgage but I am proud to have my own litttle property. If the
landlords are allowed to continue to raise rents then my dreams will be shattered, this is
why rent protection is so very important. I can only imagine what it is like for the elderly.
Please help people like myself to continue to live in these parks.
Thank you,
le�Z - &zz
Chris Sheehan
6301 Warner Ave #25
H.B. , Ca 92647
Lynda Muir
6241 Warner Ave. Space 135
Huntington Beach,Ca.92647
February 14, 1997
H.B.M.O.A.
P.O.BOX 7975
HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIF.92615
To Whom It Concerns,
I am writing this letter in regards to the high space rent that is charged at Sea Aira Mobile Home Estates in
Huntington Beach,where I reside.
I find it puzzling that space rent is so varied from park to park.Quite frankly,when I was looking at mobile
homes to possibly buy I almost didn't buy in this park because the space rent charged is so much higher than other
parks in the area.Two of my family members also live in mobile home parks,locally,and they pay quite a bit lower
in rent than I do. My mother lives in a park right next to Huntington Harbor and she i,charged less than Sea Aira
MH Estates.I questioned the real estate woman about this and she said that because my mother lives in a senior
park(55 and older)the rent was lower and that was the same for other parks in the area.I have a real problem with
this.
I agree that elderly people are on a fixed income but so are famillies like mine.I am a single parent of a
twelve year old daughter living on a very tight income.Unfortunately, I have only received three child support
checks over an eight year period.That is also a typical story of single parents who have a continual battle dealing
with the failure of the district attorney's office enforcing child support orders.I must say that as my daughter gets
older and her needs grow and change,my pay check seems to shrink.Thank God I have a good job but it is almost
not enough.
It seems as though just because children are involved the price goes up.Why??Don't get me wrong,the
park is nice,clean,basically quiet,but nothing spectacular.Again,why is the rent higher than all others around??
Another thing I have noticed is that the elderly people who have been living here for quite a while pay a basically
smaller rent. I wonder if their rent is raised the same as the new residents.The space rent is frozen for the first two
years upon moving in, but I have heard that it is raised immediately after your two year anniversary.Again,Why
???In addition to the high rent there is also a charge for trash of$10.55 per month.My brother's park charges a
similar fee, but their trash is picked up weekly by the trash truck right in front of their home.At Sea Aira the
residents have to transport their own trash to one of the several dumpsters located throughout the park.That is a
definite inconvienence,especially when the dumpsters typically become overloaded the closer it gets to trash day.
Of coarse this is all bearable but an extra charge on top of the high rent for trash removal,which is not convienent
boggles the mind.
1 1
Bill & Eileen Gregory
6241 Warner Ave . Space #169
Huntington Beach, Calif. -
92647
February 13, 1997
Huntington Beach Mobile Home Owners Association
P.O. Box 7975
Huntington Beach, Calif. 92615
Greetings :
We are writing this letter in the hopes that you can
help with the excessively high rental rates in Mobile Home
Parks in particular the Sea Aria Mobile Home Park.
We have only been in this park for a little over two
years . Our monthly rate is about $600. 00 per month, our new
yearly increase starts in March of this year (about a 4%)
which will bring it to around $625.00. At this rate of
yearly increase in ten years our rent will be over $1000. 00.
per month, just for a 50" by 70' piece of land.
It is approaching the time in our lives when we will be
on a fixed income and believe it will be a hardship to pay
any where near that monthly rate.
We would like to see some form of rent control and a
roll back of the base rate by $140. 00 to $ 160. 00 so as to
be in line with other parks in Southern California.
For elderly people already on a fixed income it has to
be a heavy burden on them and we see our time coming
soon.
f
f
Bill & Eileen Gregory
7
-
w j i
- d
v
SubJect : RENT PROTECTION.
TO: HBMOA;
My wife, and ._ I moved into SEA AIRA Mobile Home Park
8-20-84. Our rent at that time was 195.00 per month, -including
water and trash . We had annual increases of 15.00 per month, by,
July 1986 our rent 225.00 per month, including water and trash .
In 1987 new owners took over the park and the following
rent increases ensued as follows:
DATE INCREASE PERCENT CPI
7-1-87 65.00 24% 4.4%
1-1-88 35.00
7-1-88 35.00 20% 4.0%
7-1-89 35.00 9.3% 4.8%
7-1-90 30 .00 8.0% 5.4%
7-1-91 32.00 8,0% 3. 1%
7-1-92 34.56 8.0% 3.2%
7-1-93 27.99 5. 1% 2.7%
7-1-94 19.78 4.0% 2.6%
7-1-95 20 .57 4.0% 3. 1%
7-1-96 21 .39 4.0% 2.6%
In addition to the above Increases, our water costs went
from zero to a minimum 8.80 per month and our trash bills 'went
from zero to 10 .55 per month .These trash costs are for
dumpsters,which entails fairly long walks for some of the
elderly ladies to dispose of their trash .
The new owners unilaterly changed the park from seniors
only to all ages. Which changed our way of life from very good
to almost intolerable .
All these rent increases have caused my home to go from
60 ,000 to a possibile 20 ,000 , as soon as anew buyer finds out
w - the rent will be over six hundred a month , its goodbye buyer .
I ,� ✓ IlOrr �
MAYOR
0 itECb,EO Dave Sullivan
1 Y CLciiA
t City of Huaztingt9 �� acki
'� ' MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
Y — P. O. BOX 190 • 2000 MAIN STREET CLIF 1 9Z Ralph Bauer
Jul
COUNCILMEMBERS
Shirley Dettloff
David P. Garofalo
Peter Green
Tom Harman
Victor Leipzig
To: Mayor & City Council
Fr: Dave Garofalo
Re: Council Meeting - June 3 , 1996
In anticipation of not being present at some portion of the
City Council meeting, I did want to enter some thoughts into the
record.
I will assume, that D-1 will be deferred. I have some very
positive and new thoughts to add to this concept that could
significantly benefit all parties involved.
1 . E-2, Public Facilities Corp. While I do not have any
particular problem with the recommended action, I am the Liaison to
this group and I have not seen the applications prior to tonight' s
agenda. Were there any other applications, is there term limits for
this group; what is pleasure of council? I would like to review
status of PFC and report back to council .
2 . �F=1, I will be supporting the creation of official status
�d of this new group. Moving immediately from Advisory Committee to a
COMMISSION seems several leaps and bounds more that practical in
it ' s beginning stages . When I attempted to create our newest
economic develop group there was significant council dialogue on
making it a Board, which I capitulated to. I would suggest that we
M� approve this item establishing a Mobile Home Advisory Board and
hold off on the Commission status until it actually begins' to meet
with some results and open dialogue .
Also, the only area of disagreement . I can find speaks to
the issue of the 3 members from the park ownership side . It would
seem obvious that most of the owners are absentee. Have we
considered a compromise that would appear to make sense. One (1)
member of the owners group to be required to live in town, and two
(2) at large. That would seem fair. While all (3) should not be
required to live here, some compromising is needed if we are to
lead.
TELEPHONE (714) 536-5553
FAX(714)536-5233
ORDINANCE NO. 3332
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ADDING CHAPTER 2.112 TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
ESTABLISHING THE MOBILE HOME ADVISORY BOARD
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 2.112 entitled "Mobile Home Advisory Board" is added to
the Huntington Beach Municipal Code to read as follows:
"2.112.010 Board Established. There is hereby established the Mobile Home
Advisory Board.
2.112.020 Purpose. The purpose of the Board shall be:
(a) To ensure the quality of life in mobile home parks and to review matters
concerning mobile home parks in the City of Huntington Beach through
healthy communication with park owners, manufactured home owners and
the City Council.
(b) To act in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters
concerning the mobile home community.
2.112.030 Composition. The Mobile Home Advisory Board shall consist of nine
(9) members. Membership shall be comprised of three (3) Huntington Beach
mobile home park owners (who may or may not reside in Huntington Beach),
three (3) Huntington Beach mobile home resident owners, and three (3)
Huntington Beach independent citizens-at-large who have no affiliation or
relationship with mobile home parks. All members shall be selected by the City
Council from applicants for such position.
2.112.040 Removal of Members. Members of the Board shall serve until their
respective successors are appointed and qualified. The City Council shall have the
power to fill any vacancies. Unless otherwise specified, terms of members of the
Board shall be four (4) years, staggered so that the majority of terms shall end in
odd-numbered years following the election of four (4) council members and the
remainder of the terms shall end in odd-number years following the election of
three (3) council members. Any member of the Board may be removed by
majority vote of the City Council present when such vote is taken. Any member
who absents himself from three (3) consecutive, regular meetings or more without
the permission of the Board chairperson shall be deemed to have resigned from the
Board and his office shall become vacant. Any vacancy shall be filled by
appointment for the unexpired term by a majority vote of the Council present and
voting.
-
JM-s:PCD:Ordinance:Moblhome i I
6/7/96 ,
RLS 96-312-a
2.112.050 Vacancies--Retirement. Members shall be privileged to retire
voluntarily from the Board at any time; successors to be appointed in such case, or
any other vacancy from whatever cause, by the Mayor, with the approval of the
City Council, for the unexpired term of office.
2.112.060 Service limitation. No person shall serve more than two (2)
consecutive four-year terms.
2.112.070 Secretary. The Director of Economic Development, or his designee,
shall serve as secretary to the Board without the power to vote, and shall keep
permanent minutes of the Board meetings. Accurate and permanent records of the
acts of the Board shall be kept, and such records shall have the same status as
records of other departments of the city.
2.112.080 Meetings/Quorum.
(a) The Board shall meet at such time and place as it may fix by
resolution. All meetings shall be open to the public and consistent with the
provision of the Brown Act (open meetings law). A majority of the Board
shall constitute a quorum for transaction of business.
(b) Upon demand of any member, the roll call shall be called for yeas
and nays upon any questions before the Board. Roberts' Rules of Order
Revised shall govern the procedure of meetings of the Board unless
inconsistent with other provisions of this Chapter.
2.112.090 Operating Policies. The Board shall conform to the operating
policies for boards and commissions as set forth in Chapter 2.100 of this Code
with the exception of Section 2.100.050.
2,112.100 Bylaws. The Mobile Home Advisory Board shall adopt such bylaws
and rules as it deems necessary to provide for its officers and their method of
selection of time and place of meetings and for such other matters relative to its
work and administration of its duties which are not otherwise provided for by
statute or ordinance, subject to prior submission to and approval by the City
Council.
2
JM-s:PCD:Ordinance:Mobihome
6/7/96
RLS 96-312-a
A �
2.112.OtO- Advisors. The Mobile Home Advisory Board may request of the
Director of Economic Development the attendance at its meetings of any officer or
employee of the City to assist the Board in its deliberations in an advisory capacity
but who shall not have the authority to vote upon any matter being considered by
the Board."
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty days after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of June , 1996.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City.Attorney
&41-6- 7- L_ ),
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City Administrator DiVector of Economic Development
3
J%I-s:PCD:Ordinance:Moblhome
6/7/96
RLS 96-312-a
Ord. No. 3332
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do
hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd of June,1996, and was again read to said
City Council at a re ular meeting thereof held on the 17th of June, 1996, and was
passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of
said City Council.
AYES: Councilmembers:
Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green, Garofalo
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
L Connie Brockway CITY CLERK of the City of
Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council,
do hereb}•certify that a synopsis of this ordinance has been
published in the Independent on
U.V\2 Z1 194q(0
In accordance with the City Charter of said City City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
/bonnie BrockN\7av City Clerk of the City Council of the City
Deputy City Clerk of Huntington Beach, California
G/ordinanc/ordbkpg
7/2/96
BYLAWS
HUNTINGTON BEACH MOBILE HOME ADVISORY BOARD
ARTICLE I: MEETINGS
Section 1. Board Meetings
1. Regular meetings shall be held on the forth (4th) Monday of each month at [time] and [place].
2. Special Board meetings may be convened by the Chair or by written request by three (3) or
more of the members of the Board.
Section 2. Officers
The officers of the Mobile Home Advisory Board are the Chair and Chair Elect. The officers
shall be selected from the three independent members of the for a one year term. Once officers
are elected, after the first year, the Chair Elect shall rotate to Chair, and a new Chair Elect shall be
elected
Section 3. Duties
1. Chair:
The Chair shall preside at all meeting and serve as the official spokesperson of the Board and
carry out the decisions of the Board.
2. Chair Elect:
The Chair Elect shall assume all duties of the Chair in any absence of the Chair or until any
vacancy in that office is filled.
3. Chair Pro-Tempore:
Chair Pro-Tempore shall be elected by ballot (for that meeting only), in the event of absence
of the Chair, Chair Elect, and the third independent member.
1
SF\s:PCD:Ordinance:Moblhome
6/7/96
RLS 96-312
Section 4. Annual Report
The Board shall prepare a report annually for the City Council for review. The report shall
include, but not be limited to the following information:
• Number of meetings held
• Board member attendance
• Staff support and involvement
• Number of written complaints by citizens and/or request for Board assistance
• Action and activities
• Review expenses incurred and any recommended budget allocation request for the
following year.
Section 5. Meeting Procedures
1. Minutes (written and audio) shall be kept of all Board meetings by city staff and approved
by the Board.
2. Public comments shall be heard at the beginning of each Board meeting. Each public
comment shall be allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes.
Section 6. Representation
No Board member shall act in an official capacity as a representative of the Board unless directed
to do so by a majority vote of all member of the Board. Only authorized business cards shall be
issued to or used by Board members.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City/Atttorney
afil
i ( -7_1j6
2
S Fls:PCD:Ordinance:Moblhome
6/7/96
RLS 96-312
B. INDEPENDENT
PUBLISH DATE: 6/27/96
LEGAL NOTICE
ORDINANCE NO 3332
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADDING CHAPTER 2.112 OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING THE MOBILE HOME ADVISORY BOARD
SYNOPSIS
Ordinance No. 3332 of the Huntington Beach iuntington
Beach Municipal Code and establishes the Mi board is to
ensure the quality of life in mobile home park., r LAO parks in
the City of Huntington Beach through healthy ` \&4 come
owners and the City Council. The board is to �-- t matters
concerning the mobile home community.
Membership shall consist of nine members. M leach
mobile home park owners, (who may or may ni �.e Beach
mobile home resident owners and three Huntin; ve no
affiliation or relationship with mobile home park,.
This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting held Monday,
June 17, 1996, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green,
Garofalo
E
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
G/synopsis
6/21/96
B. INDEPENDENT
PUBLISH DATE: 6/27/96
LEGAL NOTICE
ORDINANCE NO 3332
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADDING CHAPTER 2.112 OF THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING THE MOBILE HOME ADVISORY BOARD
SYNOPSIS
Ordinance No. 3332 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code adds new Chapter 2.112 to the Huntington
Beach Municipal Code and establishes the Mobile Home Advisory Board. The purpose of the board is to
ensure the quality of life in mobile home parks and to review matters concerning mobile home parks in
the City of Huntington Beach through healthy communication with park owners, manufactured home
owners and the City Council. The board is to act in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters ..
concerning the mobile home community.
Membership shall consist of nine members. Members shall be comprised of three Huntington Beach
mobile home park owners, (who may or may not reside in Huntington Beach),I`hree Huntington Beach
mobile home resident owners and three Huntington Beach independent citizens-at-large who have no
affiliation or relationship with mobile home parks.
This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
THE FULL TEXT OF THE ORDINANCE IS AVAILABLE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting held Monday,
June 17, 1996, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Harman, Leipzig, Bauer, Sullivan, Dettloff, Green,
Garofalo
' NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CONNIE BROCKWAY .�.,..
CITY CLERK
G/synopsis
6/21/96
LiTY OF HUNTIN TO N BEACH \HUNTING TON
MEETING DATE: June 3, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 96-36
Council/Agency Meeting Held: /M/
De rred/C tinue to:
proved ditionally Approved ❑ Denied City Clerk's Signatur
Council deeting Date: June 3, 1996 Department ID Number: ED 96-36
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH L.�= rn
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION '�` - �
—.— c" rn
-- r• <
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS r
SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Admi at !
PREPARED BY: DAVID C. BIGGS, Director of Economic Development
SUBJECT: Mobile Home Review Commission Enabling Ordinance and By-
Laws � , 333� -� 1 3-96
6 —/7-9[
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) 11
Statement of Issue: At the June 5, 1995 meeting of the City Council agreed to
continue the Mobile Home Review Committee as a permanent committee. The Committee
was to bring back recommendations to the City Council, within a period of one year, as to
its role and responsibilities. The committee has meet numerous times to discuss the by-
laws and enabling ordinance. Provisional approval of the proposed enabling ordinance
and by-laws, with the exception of composition in the enabling ordinance and Article I,
Section 3 (Composition) in the proposed by-laws, was made at the April 22, 1996 MHRC
meeting. The following is the committee's and staffs recommendations for Article I,
Section 3 (Composition):
Mobile home park owners'preference: Membership shall be comprised of three (3)
members representing mobile home park owners who shall not be subject to
Section 2.100.050 City residency requirement, but must own a mobile home park in
the City of Huntington Beach), three (3) members representing mobile home
owners, and three (3) independent citizens-at-large who has no affiliation or
relationship with mobile home parks selected by the City Council from applicants for
such position.
As approved October 25, 1993 by City Council and the preference of the mobile
home residents: To include three (3) mobile home park owners or their managers
(with preference to Huntington Beach residents, three (3) Huntington Beach mobile/ /
MHRCORD.DOC -2- 05/24/96 10:23 AM
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIOiv
MEETING DATE: June 3, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 96-36
home residents, and three (3) residents of the city without ties to, or financial
interests in, mobile homes.
Staff recommendation: Membership shall be comprised of three (3) Huntington
Beach mobile home park owners (or mobile home management representatives for
Huntington Beach mobile home parks who reside in Huntington Beach), three (3)
Huntington Beach mobile home resident owners, three (3) Huntington Beach
independent citizens-at-large who have no affiliation or relationship with mobile
home parks. All members shall be selected by the City Council from applicants for
such position.
Fundinq Source: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Housing Set aside
funds currently pay for staff salaries, benefits, materials and supplies for the committee.
Recommended Action: Motion to:
1. Approve the enabling ordinance to establish the Mobile Home Review Commission.
2. Approve the proposed by-laws for the Mobile Home Review Commission.
Alternative Action(s): Motion to:
Disband the Mobile Home Review Committee.
Analysis: At the City Council meeting of October 25, 1993, the City Council, through
minute action, established the Mobile Home Review Committee for a period of 18 months.
When the City Council formed the Mobile Home Review Committee, a mission was
established as follows: "This committee has been created to investigate the various issues
concerning mobile home park ownership and residency. The committee will make
recommendations to the City Council in an attempt to seek resolve to disputes in a fair and
equitable manner to all parties involved."
At the City Council meeting of June 5, 1995, Council approved the MHRC as a permanent
committee with the stipulation that the committee bring back to the Council within one year
an enabling ordinance and by-laws. At the February 26, 1996 meeting of the MHRC, the
enabling ordinance and by-laws were approved for submittal to the City Council for your
approval except for the composition of the committee.
MHRCORD.DOC -3- 05/24/96 10:26 AM
RCQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIuA
MEETING DATE: June 3, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 96-36
On April 22, 1996, the MHRC met with the Council liaisons Mayor Sullivan and Council
member Dettloff, to see if they would recommend what should be the composition of the
commission. After meeting with the committee, the Council liaisons requested the committee
try to come to a compromise on the composition issue. After lengthy discussion at the April
22nd MHRC meeting, no compromise could be reached. A motion was made to submit to
the City Council the by-laws and the enabling ordinance, with an explanation on provisional
approval with the exception of Article I, Section 3 (Composition) in both.
Also, staff would like to make Council aware of the fact that the MHRC believes that it should
have bommission" status, as opposed to being a board or committee. The proposed
enabling ordinance designates the body as a commission. Chapter 2.100 of the Huntington
Beach Municipal Code provides the following definitions:
Board: `b body of members appointed pursuant to Huntington Beach
Charter section 405 to serve in a continuing advisory capacity to
the City Council , except for such boards which have decision
making authority pursuant to the particular establishing ordinance
creating such Board;"
Commission: `b body of members appointed pursuant to Huntington Beach
Charter section 405 which may have decision making authority in
those activities delegated to them by the City Council;"
Committee: `b body of members appointed pursuant to Huntington Beach
Charter section 405 on an ad hoc basis to advise the City
Council on particular matters."
Staff believes that the Council should be made aware of the distinctions in terminology and
function. The City Attorney can discuss the basic differences at the direction of Council.
Environmental Status: N/A
Attachment(s):
City Clerk's
Page Number
.........
.......................... ..................
............................. ..............
............................. ...........
......................... . . .......... .
1. Enabling Ordinance 333.
2. By
3. MHRC minutes for February 26,
1996
.
4. MHRC minutes for April 22 1996
P
5. Counci
l I action
ti n of June 5 199 J 5
MHRCORD.DOC - -4- 05/28/96 5:12 PM
Enabling Ordinance
ATTACHMENT # 1
ORDINANCE NO. 3 3-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ADDING CHAPTER 2.112 TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE
ESTABLISHING THE MOBILE HOME ADVISORY COMMISSION
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 2.112 entitled"Mobile Home Advisory Commission" is
added to the Huntington Beach Municipal Code to read as follows:.
"2.112.010 Commission Established.There is hereby established the Mobile Home
Advisory Commission.
2.112.020 Purpose. The purpose of the Commission shall be:
(a) To ensure the quality of life in mobile home parks and to review matters
concerning mobile home parks in the City of Huntington Beach through
healthy communication with park owners, manufactured home owners and
the City Council.
(b) To act in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters
concerning.the mobile home community.
2.112.030 Composition. The Mobile Home Advisory Commission shall consist
of nine (9)members. Membership shall be comprised of three (3) Huntington
Beach mobile home park owners (or mobile home management representatives for
Huntington Beach mobile home parks who reside in Huntington Beach), three (3)
Huntington Beach mobile home resident owners, and three (3) Huntington Beach
independent citizens-at-large who have no affiliation or relationship with mobile
home parks. All members shall be selected by the City Council from applicants for
such position.
2.112.040 Removal of Members. Members of the Commission shall serve until
their respective successors are appointed and qualified. The City Council shall
have the power to fill any vacancies. Unless otherwise specified, terms of
members of the Commission shall be four(4)years, staggered so that the majority
of terms shall end in odd-numbered years following the election of four (4) council
members and the remainder of the terms shall end in odd-number years following
the election of three (3) council members. Any member of the Commission may be
removed by majority vote of the City Council present when such vote is taken.
Any member who absents himself from three(3) consecutive, regular meetings or
more without the permission of the commission chairperson shall be deemed to
have resigned from the Commission and his office shall become vacant. Any
1
SFIs:PCD:Ordinance:Moblhome
5/22/96
RLS 96-312
vacancy shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired term by a majority vote of
the Council present and voting.
2.112.050 Vacancies--Retirement. Members shall be privileged to retire
voluntarily from the Commission at any time; successors to be appointed in such
case, or any other vacancy from whatever cause, by the Mayor, with the approval
of the City Council, for the unexpired term of office.
2.112.060 Service limitation. No person shall serve more than two (2)
consecutive four-year terms.
2.112.070 Secretary. The Director of Economic Development, or his designee,
shall serve as secretary to the Commission without the power to vote, and shall
keep permanent minutes of the Commission meetings. Accurate and permanent
records of the acts of the Commission shall be kept, and such records shall have
the same status as records of other departments of the city.
2.112.080 Meetings/Quorum.
(a) The Commission shall meet at such time and place as it may fix by
resolution. All meetings shall be open to the public and consistent with the
provision of the Brown Act (open meetings law). A majority of the
Commission shall constitute a quorum for transaction of business.
(b) Upon demand of any member, the roll call shall be called for yeas
and nays upon any questions before the Commission. Roberts' Rules of
Order Revised shall govern the procedure of meetings of the Commission
unless inconsistent with other provisions of this Chapter.
2.112.090 Operating Policies. The Commission shall conform to the
operating policies for boards and commissions as set forth in Chapter 2.100 of this
Code with the exception of Section 2.100.050.
2.112.100 Bylaws. The Mobile Home Advisory Commission shall adopt such
bylaws and rules as it deems necessary to provide for its officers and their method
of selection of time and place of meetings and for such other matters relative to its
work and administration of its duties which are not otherwise provided for by
statute or ordinance, subject to prior submission to and approval by the City
Council.
SFs:PCD:ordinance:Moblhome 2
5/22/96
RLS 96-312
2.112.010 Advisors. The Mobile Home Advisory Commission may request of the
Director of Economic Development the attendance at its meetings of any officer or
employee of the City to assist the Commission in its deliberations in an advisory
capacity but who shall not have the authority to vote upon any matter being
considered by the Commission."
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty days after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
at a xegular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1996.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CityClerk City Attorney
`-�
�� Y Y
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
City Administrator Director of Economic Development
3 SF\s:PCD:Ordinance:Moblhome /
5/22/96 l
RLS 96-312
By-Laws
ATTACHIVIENxT #2
By-Laws
.....................................ATTACHMENT #2
BYLAWS
DRAFT FEBRUARY 26, 1996
[To be adopted by Commission]
HUNTINGTON BEACH MOBILE HOME ADVISORY _ ON
ARTICLE I: MEETINGS
Section 1. Commission Meetings
1. Regular meetings shall be held on the forth (4th)Monday of each month at [time] and [place].
2. Special Commission meetings may be convened by the Chair or by written request by three (3)
or more of the members of the Commission.
Section 2. Officers
The officers of the Mobile Home Advisory Commission are the Chair and Chair Elect. The
officers shall be selected from the three independent members of the Commission for a one year
term. Once officers are elected, after the first year, the Chair Elect shall rotate to Chair, and a
new Chair Elect shall be elected
Section 3. Duties
1. Chair:
The Chair shall preside at all meeting and serve as the official spokesperson of the
Commission and carry out the decisions of the Commission.
2. Chair Elect:
The Chair Elect shall assume all duties of the Chair in any absence of the Chair or until any
vacancy in that office is filled.
3. Chair Pro-Tempore:
Chair Pro-Tempore shall be elected by ballot(for that meeting only), in the event of absence
of the Chair, Chair Elect, and the third independent member.
1
SF\s:G:SF-Misc:Mblbylaw
5/22/96
Rr.S 96-312
Section 4. Annual Report
The Commission shall prepare a report annually for the City Council for review. The report shall
include, but not be limited to the following information:
• Number of meetings held
• Commission member attendance
• Staff support and involvement
• Number of written complaints by citizens and/or request for Commission assistance
• Action and activities
• Review expenses incurred and any recommended budget allocation request for the
following year.
Section 5. Meeting Procedures
l. Minutes (written and audio) shall be kept of all Commission meetings by city staff and
approved by the Commission.
2. Public comments shall be heard at the beginning of each Commission meeting. Each
public comment shall be allotted a maximum of five(5) minutes.
Section 6. Representation
No commission member shall act in an official capacity as a representative of the Commission
unless directed to do so by a majority vote of all member of the Commission. Only authorized
business cards shall be issued to or used by Commission members.
Chairman
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Agency Clerk �„i Agency Counsel (�
2
SF1s:G:SF-Misc:Mbibylaw
5/22/96
RIS 96-312
MHRC minutes for February 26, 1996
. ................. . ........ .....
.... ...... .. . ............... ............._.
. ..... ...... ................ ... ............ ......... .......
........ ....... ....... .......... ...............
. .............. . ..... ..... . ......
... . ............ ... .......... ..............
............... .. ........... .............
. ... .................. ............... ............. .
MINUTES
MOBILE HOME REVIEW COMMITTEE
February 26, 1996
6:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sandra Cole, Don Caldwell, Eugene Pica, Steven Kato,
Steve Novarro, Ken Pollock, Mark Porter, Pauline Robison
and Jan Shomaker. Cole arrived at 6:40 p.m.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
CITY REPRESENTATIVES: Dan Bruening
Chair Porter called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. and called the roll.
Chair Porter called for any amendments to the minutes of the January 22, 1996 meeting. Motion
was made by Shomaker to approve the minutes which was seconded by Pollock. All ayes.
Minutes approved.
Public Comments
Steve Gullage President of HBMOA; read a letter prepared by Ann Nelson, resident of
Rancho Del Rey concerning the lease and park rules and regulations,
including the 90 day rent increase notification. She also addressed the hold
harmless clause, binding arbitration, pass thru cost and said that this will be
effective in six (6) months.
Vickie Talley Executive Director of Mobile Home Education Trust (NMET); spoke
about the lease addressed in the letter from Ann Nelson. She defined
clauses in leases with rules and regulations, and also said that no laws were
broken. She also volunteered to bring facts to the table.
Proposed By-Laws
Chair Porter opened discussion on the by-laws. Pollock commented on section 2 that the way it is
written is confusing. Pollock motioned to change Section 2 (Purpose)by adding"(a) and (b)" as
follows: "This Commission has been a) created to ensure the quality of life in mobile home parks
and b anal ze matters concerning mobile home parks in the City of Huntington Beach through
healthy communication with park owners, manufactured home owners, and the City Council."
Motion was seconded by Porter. Discussion followed. Motion and second withdrawn.
Pollock motioned to reconsider the previous action on Section 2 by changing wording to reflect
the following: "This Commission has been a) created to ensure the quality of life in mobile home
parks and b) to review matters concerning mobile home parks in the City of Huntington Beach
through healthy communication with park owners, manufactured home owners, and the City
Council." Call for the question. 6 ayes, 3 noes (Kato, Pica, Novarro). Motion passed.
G:Bruening\MobrevMnfeb.doc - 1 - 5/15/96
G( \
Motion by Cole to reconsider Section 3 (Duties) as follows: Membership shall be comprised of
two 2 members representing mobile home park owners, three (3) members representing mobile
home owners, and two 2 independent citizens at large who have no affiliation or relationship
with mobile home parks selected by the City Council from applicants for such position." The
motion was seconded by Caldwell. Discussion Followed. The question was called: 4 ayes, 5
noes (Kato, Pica, Novarro, Pollock, Shomaker). Motion failed.
Article H
Motion by Pollock to remove"and majority vote" from Section 3 (Voting), and to change
number 3 to read as follows: "All items for consideration by the Commission shall require a
motion and a second." Motion seconded by Shomaker, Discussion followed. Call for the
question. All ayes. Motion Passed.
Article III
Motion by Pollock to change"Officer" to "Officers" and in Section 1, "Vice Chair" to "Chair
Elect" to read as follows: "Article III, Officers and Duties: The Officers of the Mobile Home
Review Commission are the Chair and Chair Elect." Motion seconded by Cole. Discussion
followed. Call for the question. All ayes. Motion passed.
Motion by Pollock to change Section 3 to read as follows: "The Chair shall preside at all
meetings and serve as the official spokesperson of the Commission and carry out the decisions of
the Commission." Motion seconded by Caldwell. Discussion followed. Call for the question.
All ayes. Motion passed.
Motion by Caldwell to add Section 3 to read as follows: "3. Chair Pro-Tempore. Chair Pro-
Tempore shall be elected by ballot (for that meeting only), in the event of the absence of the
Chair, Chair Elect, and the third independent member." Motion seconded by Pollock. Discussion
followed. Call for the question. All ayes. Motion passed.
Article IV
Motion by Cole to accept Article IV Vacancies as follows: "Should a member of the
Commission resign his/her position on the Commission, such vacancy shall be filled by the City
Council at their next possible meeting." The motion was seconded by Shomaker. Discussion
followed. A call for the question was made. All ayes. Motion passed.
Article V
A motion by Novarro to approve Grounds for Removal to read as follows: ((1. A member of the
Commission may be removed from the Commission for just cause -- including failure to attend
more than two (2) consecutive regular monthly meetings of the Commission without excuse. An
excused absence shall be submitted to the Staff Liaison or Chair prior to the meeting.
2. Procedure for Removal - Upon the direction of the Commission Chair, staff shall notify the
member, by registered mail, that he/she has been considered to have relinquished his/her position
G:Bruening\N4obrev\Minfeb.doc -2- 5/15/96
on the Commission pursuant to Subsection 1. of this article." The motion was seconded by Pica.
Discussion followed. Call for the question. All ayes. Motion passed.
Article VI
A motion by Caldwell to approve the annual report as follows: "The Commission shall prepare a
report annually for the City Council for review. The report shall include, but not be limited to the
following information:
• Number of meetings held
• Commission member attendance
• Staff support and involvement
• Number of written complaints by citizens and/or request for Commission assistance
• Action and activities
• Review expenses incurred and any recommended budget allocation request for the
following year."
The motion was seconded by Robison. Discussion followed. Call for the question was made. All
ayes. Motion passed.
Article VII
A motion by Robison to approve procedure with the addition of an"s" in the word "procedure."
The motion was seconded by Pollock. Discussion followed. Motion and second with drawn.
Motion by Novarro to approve Article VII to read as follows:
ARTICLE VII: PROCEDURES
Section 1. Minutes (written and audio) shall be kept of all Commission
meetings by city staff and approved by the Commission.
Section 2. Any member may recommend an item for the agenda of the
following meeting.
Section 3. All Commission meetings shall be held in accordance with the
current provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act.
Section 4. Public comments shall be heard at the beginning of each
Commission meeting. Each public commentary shall be allotted a
maximum of five(5) minutes.
Section 5. These by-laws shall govern the organization, operation, and
function of the Mobile Home Review Commission.
Section 6. The latest edition of"Robert's Rules of Order" shall govern for all
matters not covered by these by-laws.
G:Bruening\Mobrev\N4infeb.doc -3 - 5/15/96
Section 7. These by-laws may be amended by two-thirds of the members
voting at a regular or special meeting of the Commission.
Section 8. No commission member or officer shall act in an official capacity as
a representative of the Commission unless directed to do so by a
majority vote of all member of the Commission.
The motion was seconded by Shomaker. Discussion followed. Call for the question. All Ayes.
Motion passed
Motion by Novarro to remove Section 9. The motion was seconded by Pica. Discussion
followed. A call for the question. 4 ayes, 5 noes (Pollock, Porter, Robison, Caldwell, Cole).
Motion failed.
Motion by Caldwell to leave Section 9 to read as follows: "Only authorized business cards shall
be issued to or used by Commission members." Motion seconded by Robison. Discussion
followed. Call for the question. 5 ayes, 4 noes (Kato, Pica, Novarro, Shomaker). Motion
passed.
Chair requested any additional items that are needed in the by-laws. No comments. Chair Porter
requested this item to be agendized at the next regular meeting for adoption.
Chair Porter open comments for the committee on the proposed ordinance.
A motion by Cole to reconsider Article I, Section 3 Members to change the commission make-up
to "3 mobile home residents, 2 park owners and 2 members at large. Motion was seconded by
Caldwell. Discussion followed. Call for the question. 4 ayes. 4 noes (Kato, Pica, Novarro,
Shomaker) 1 abstained. (Pollock). Motion failed.
A motion to approve the second and third paragraphs under composition to read as follows:
"The term of office of the commission members shall be four years. Members shall hold no paid
office or employment in the city government while serving on such commission. If the City
Council determines that a member be retired, it may so order and appoint a successor for the un-
expired term of office of such retired member. Further, members shall be privileged to retire
voluntarily from the Commission at any time, successors to be appointed by the City Council in
such cases for the un-expired terms of office, and in the event of other occurring vacancies from
whatever cause, by the City Council by a majority of votes.
A member of the Commission may be removed from the Commission for just cause -- including
failure to attend more than two (2) consecutive regular monthly meetings of the Commission
without excuse. An excused absence shall be submitted to the staff liaison or Chair prior to the
meeting." The motion was seconded by Caldwell. Call for the question. 8 ayes, 1 abstained
(Cole). Motion passed.
Motion by Pollock to approve the section called Secretary to read as follows: "Secretary. The
Director of Economic Development, or his designee, shall serve as secretary to the Commission
without the power to vote, and shall keep permanent minutes of the Commission meetings.
Robert's' Rules of Order(current edition) shall govern the procedure of the meetings of the
G:Bruening\A4obrevWnfeb.doc -4- 5/15/96
Commission unless inconsistent with other provisions of this chapter." Motion seconded by
Caldwell. Discussion followed. Call for the question. All ayes. Motion passed.
A motion by Novarro to approve section named Authority and Responsibilities to read as follows:
"Authority and Responsibilities. The Commission shall act in advisory capacity to the City
Council in matters pertaining to the mobile home community." The motion was seconded by
Pica. Discussion followed. Call for the question. All ayes. Motion passed.
Motion by Shomaker to approve the sections, Meeting - Quorum, Operating Policies and By-
Laws to read as follows: "Meetings --Quorum. The Commission shall meet at such time and
place as it may fix by resolution. All meetings shall be open to the public and consistent with the
provision of the Brown Act (open meetings law). A majority of the Commission shall constitute a
quorum for transaction of business.
Operating Policies. The Commission shall conform to the operating policies for boards and
commissions as set forth in Chapter 2.100 of this code with the exception of Section 2.100.050.
By-Laws. The commission may establish by-laws, and amendments thereto, subject to prior
submission to and approval by the City Council." The motion was seconded by Pollock.
Discussion followed. Call for the question. All ayes. Motion passed.
A motion by Caldwell to approve the enabling ordinance section Established and Purpose to read
as follows: "Established. There is hereby established the Mobile Home Review Commission.
Purpose. The purpose of the Commission shall be:
(a) This Commission has been created to ensure the quality of life in mobile home parks and to
review matters concerning mobile home parks in the City of Huntington Beach through healthy
communication with park owners, manufactured home owners and the City Council..
(b) The Commission will act in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters concerning the
Mobile Home community."
The motion was seconded by Robison. Discussion followed. Call for the question. 8 ayes, 1 no
(Novarro). Motion passed.
Chair Porter called for a break at 8:20 p.m.
Chair Porter reconvened the meeting at 8:35 p.m.
City Clerk Presentation
Chair Porter introduced Connie Brockway, City Clerk to the Committee members and the
audience. Brockway explained to the Committee the function of the City Clerk's office. She
handed out information packets. In the packet is information on the type of records that the
Clerk's office keeps, and Brockway explained how to request information on a council meeting.
She also explained about the computerized bulletin board and how a person can access
information about a meeting, the minutes of a meeting, and so forth. Brockway presented the
G:Bruening\Mobrev\N4infeb.doc -5 - 5/15/96
oldest hand written book on City Council minutes that had been rebound. Brockway also spoke
concerning the history of Huntington Beach and the historical information that is available at the
Clerk's office. Chair Porter thanked Brockway for taking the time to inform the Committee of
her duties and the City Clerk's Office functions. Every one in attendance thanked her with a
round of applause.
Privacy Act Requirements
Chair Porter explained that this item was tabled at the last meeting and was to be continued until
this evening. Staff gave an overview of the privacy act and said that it only pertains to
government action and does not have any jurisdiction on non-government access to financial
information. Discussion followed. Chair Porter requested staff contact the City Attorney's Office
to see if there is any jurisdiction concerning non governmental access to financial records. This
item to be agendized for the next meeting.
Anti-Crime Coalition Update
Chair Porter stated that this item was continued from the January 22, 1996 meeting. Staff
reported that at the November 27, 1995 meeting, Pollock raised the issue that was reported in the
Anti-Crime Coalition Newsletter from the Police Department. Staff reported that they spoke to
Officer Kelly of the PD and reported that the changes that were made were to affect existing
ordinances by adding verbiage concerning public nuisance. Officer Kelly said that in certain cases
is was easier to enforce regulations on public nuisance than it is on criminal activities. Discussion
followed.
Up Date On the Mobile Home Survey
Steven Kato updated the Committee on the meeting with Lawrence Research. Kato spoke on the
concerns that the City Council review the questions to make sure that they are proper to be asked
of the residents of the City. He also said that Mr. Lawrence asked to have the Committee form
into 3 segments of 3 members each, made up of resident members, park owner members, and at-
large members. Each segment will form 12 to 15 concerns, opinions , and other items that the
Committee thinks would be important to the City. Discussion followed. Chair Porter requested
that all segments get together to form these concerns so that they can be forwarded to Lawrence
Research as soon as possible.
Committee Member Comments
Sandra Cole had questions concerning the new water rates. Some bills state $3.50 meter rate,
$3.00 Capitol facilities charge and some have a $5.30 meter charge. She questioned the correct
charge. Staff stated that the water rate issue is scheduled for the March 4, 1996 meeting of the
City Council.
Steve Novarro spoke about having park representatives sit on the Committee. He stated that the
park owner's age would be a consideration in choosing a representative.
Don Caldwell addressed the letter from Ann Nelson of Rancho Del Rey that binding arbitration is
not legal. Sandra Cole stated her concerns about the lease. Chair Porter requested that this item
G:Bruening\Mobrev\Minfeb.doc -6- 5/15/96
be agendized for the next meeting. He also requested that information from all parties be made
available in the packet for the Committee members.
Next Agenda:
1. Proposed By-Laws
2. Up Date on Mobile Home Survey
3. Privacy Act Requirements for Non Government
4. Up Date on Water Meter Rate issue
5. Letter from Ann Nelson
ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Shomaker and seconded by Pollock to adjourn the meeting to March, 25
1996, at 6:30 p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
G:Bruening\Mobrev\Minfeb.doc -7- 5/15/96
MHRC minutes for April 22, 1996
ATTACHMENT #.4
MINUTES
MOBILE HOME REVIEW COMMITTEE
April 22, 1996
6:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Caldwell, Sandra Cole, Eugene Pica, Steve Novarro,
Ken Pollock, Mark Porter, Pauline Robison and Jan
Shomaker.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Steven Kato
CITY REPRESENTATIVES: Dan Bruening
Vice Chair Porter called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and called the roll.
Chair Porter called for any amendments to the minutes of the March 25, 1996 meeting. Motion
was made by Pollock to approve the minutes as amended (correction of date of March meeting;
spelling corrections: Craig, next, and beginning). Seconded by Shomaker. 6 ayes 2 abstained
(Porter, Caldwell). Minutes approved.
Public Comments
No Public Comments.
Proposed By-Laws
Chair Porter informed the audience present the action that had taken place at the 4:00 PM
meeting today with the Council Liaisons concerning the composition of the commission that they
hoped this would be resolved this evening. Porter opened the discussion to the committee. A
lengthy discussion was held concerning who would be eligible to represent the park owners. A
motion was made by Caldwell to send the section on composition of the proposed by-laws to the
City Council to break the deadlock, and then bring them back to the committee to review them.
Motion was seconded by Robison. Discussion followed. Motion withdrawn.
A motion was made by Cole to submit the by-laws to the City Council with an explanation on
provisional approval with the exception to Article I, Section 3 (Composition). Included in the
motion was the enabling ordinance with the same exception. The motion was seconded by
Caldwell. Discussion followed. Call for the question. 6 Ayes, 2 Abstained (Novarro, Pica).
Motion passed.
Discussion was held requesting staff to contact the Council Liaisons to see if they would
recommend what the composition of the commission should be. If recommendation is made, a
special meeting of the MHRC would be held to ratify this recommendation.
G:Bruening\MobrevMnapri1.doc - 1 - 5/16/96
Update On the Mobile Home Survey
Chair Porter reported that this item was also discussed with the Council Liaisons today. The
outcome of that discussion was that the sub-committee of the MHRC and the Economic
Development Committee (EDC) should review the questions prepared by Lawrence Research
prior to the survey being conducted. A motion was made by Cole to have the sub-committee of
the MHRC review the questions prior to the EDC review. The motion was seconded by
Shomaker. Call for the question. All ayes. Motion passed.
Ralph M. Brown Act
Staff reported to the committee that at the last meeting of the MHRC, questions were raised
about the public comment section on the meeting that citizens follow certain procedures prior to
speaking to the committee. Staff directed the committee to page 27, Section 54954.0, ". . .
Every agenda for regular meetings shall provide an opportunity for members of the public to
directly address the legislative body on any item of interest to the public." Discussion followed.
Dispute Resolution Policy
Chair Porter opened up this item for discussion by the committee. Novarro passed out the
dispute resolution policy that was presented to the committee at an earlier date. Discussion
followed. A motion was made by Cole to use the existing forms and have the person fill them out
prior to having an item agendized. The motion was seconded by Caldwell. 6 ayes 2 no's
(Novarro, Pica).
Water Meter Rate Issue
Staff reported that the City Council at the March 4, 1996 meeting requested a legal opinion
concerning passing through sub meter rate fees and capital facilities charges to parks that do not
have sub meters. Discussion followed. Staff reported that the legal opinion will be forwarded to
the MHRC as soon as it is received.
Committee Members' Comments
Caldwell discussed three items: 1) the close vote on proposition 199; 2) comments on last
month's meeting: what he heard about the conduct (even though he was not in attendance); 3)
comments on the soiree to which the council was invited.
Novarro commented that he did not think last month's meeting got out of hand, and also that the
soiree would be a good way of introducing council to management.
Cole stated that she thought Novarro attacked Ann Nelson and others at the last meeting. She
then discussed her thoughts on the conduct of last month's meeting. Novarro stated that he did
not intend to insult Ann Nelson, that if he had, he gives her his apologies.
G:BrueningWlobrevlMinapril.doc -2- 5/16/96
Next Agenda:
1. Proposed By-Laws
2. Up Date on Mobile Home Survey
3. Up Date on Water Meter Rate issue
ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Shomaker and seconded by Caldwell to adjourn the meeting to May 20,
1996, at 6:30 p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 8:27 p.m.
G:BrueningNobrevMnapril.doc -3 - 5/16/96
Council Action of June 5, 1995
ATTACHMENT #�5
Elc�
*,ITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAL.
MEETING DATE: JUNE 5, 1995 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 95-16
Council/Agency Meeting Held: -T
Deferred/Continued to:
*15�pprovedA ❑ C n 'ti Hall Approved ❑ Denied City Clerk's Signature
"_
Council Meeting Date: JUNE 5, 1995 Department ID Number: ED 95-16
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator L
PREPARED BY: Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator/Acting Director of Economic
Development afla
SUBJECT: Continuation of Mobile Home Review Committee
Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action,Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue: On October 25, 1993, the City Council approved the formation of the
Mobile Home Review .Committee for a limited term that expires July 1, 1995. The
committee's mission is to explore the concerns of the mobile home community and report the
findings to the City Council. The committee, at its meeting on May 22, determined that more
time is required to complete a comprehensive study prior to its final report to the City
Council.
Fundinq Source: General Revenue and Housing Set aside funds currently pay for staff
salaries, benefits, materials and supplies for the committee.
Recommended Action: Motion to:
1. Continue the Mobile Home Reviev►�CommitteeAin i..._its_al form fr,r norinrl of cix
w4k he committee bring back recommendations to the City Council as
to the role and responsibilities of the committee,'
Alternative Action(s): Motion to: '
Disband the Mobile home Review Committee.
MHRCEXT.DOC -2- 05/25/95 3:53 PM
1
REt,,tvEST FOR CITY COUNCIL A,., dON
MEETING DATE: JUNE 5, 1995 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: ED 95-16
Analysis: At the City Council meeting of October 25, 1993, the City Council, through
minute action, established the Mobile Home Review Committee for a period of 18 months.
When the City Council formed the Mobile Home Review Committee, a mission was
established as follows: "This committee has been created to investigate the various issues
concerning mobile home park ownership and residency. The committee will make
recommendations to the City Council in an attempt to seek resolve to disputes in a fair and
equitable manner to all parties involved."
The City Council has received quarterly committee progress reports in this avenue towards
its stated mission. The committee has started a line of communication between park
owners, management, and residents. At the committee's meeting of May 22, 1995, it was
determined that the committee needs the month of June to finalize its recommendation
report to the City Council. Therefore, staff recommends an extension of the Mobile Home
Committee from July 1, 1995, for an additional six months.
Environmental Status: N/A
Attachment(s):
City Clerk's
Page Number
..................................................
.................................................
1 RCA October 25 1993 (Formation of Mobile Home Review
Committee
2. Copy Committee
of Minute action to form ommittee
3 Letter from James Barker
Dave
4 Letter from r D ve Hennessy,
M . H ss President M L
Y,
i GS O
5 Two Letters from Johnisk S er
6 Letter from Ann Nelson, GSM L Chapt
er 5 e O Cat0Presi President
7 Letter from Sebastian Lopez, Huntington BY the Sea Home Owner
s
Association
8. Letter from GraY
ce Davis, President rancho Del Ray Homeowners
s io As ociat n
9 Letter from Alice Shaw, President, GSMO L Chapter
ter Huntington
0 Estates
Ho me Mobile ile E t Harbour
10 Letter from Barbara Laramie, President GS OL Chapter 03 2 9
andZielinski
11 Letter from Rich Zielin
12 Letter from Marilyn and Don
Allen
13 Letter from St
eve Gulla e President H.B. M bileho a Owners As
sn.
etter from John Jankowski
14 L
MHRCEXT.DOC -3- 05/25/95 12:38 PM
Page 13 -CounciUAgency Minutes- 10/25/93
(City Council) RESOLUTION NO. 6535-COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM
GUIDELINES -WEST SIDE OF BEACH BOULEVARD BETWEEN WARNER AVENUE AND
INDIANAPOLIS AVENUE-REFERRED TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
CITIZEN'S ADVISORY BOARD FOR REVIEW-CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 6, 1993 (600.15)
The City Clerk presented Resolution No.6535 for Council adoption-"A RESOLUTION OF THE
=--'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING EXECUTION BY THE
DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION AGREEMENTS
FUNDED THROUGH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM."
James Lamb, Economic Development Project Manager presented a staff report.
Following discussion a motion was made by Winchell, seconded by Sullivan,to refer the Commercial
Rehabilitation Program Guidelines to the CDBG Citizens'Advisory Board with a copy of the discussion
held by Council for their review of Council's concerns and requested a report be prepared for the
December 6, 1993 meeting. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Robitaille, Moulton-Patterson,Winchell, Silva, Sullivan, Leipzig
NOES: None
ABSENT: Bauer
(City Council) LEASE-RUBY'S DINER. INCORPORATED-HUNTINGTON BEACH PIER
RESTAURANT-COFFEE SHOP -BAITITACKLE/SNACK SHOP-RETAIL-APPROVED (600.35)
The City Clerk presented a communication from the City Administrator regarding Ruby's Pier
Concession Lease. -
Robert Franz, Deputy City Administrator, Administrative Services, presented a staff report.
Following discussion by Council a motion was made by Silva, seconded by Moulton-Patterson, to
approve the lease between the city and Ruby's Diner, Incorporated for the lease of three buildings to
be constructed by the city on the Municipal Pier for the purpose of operating three concessions,
including a combination sit-down, casual food service restaurant, a snack shop, a bait/tackle/snack
shop and related retail operations and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute same. The
motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Moulton-Patterson, Winchell, Silva, Sullivan, Leipzig
NOES: Robitaille
ABSENT: Bauer
/ �LCity Council) FORMATION OF MOBILE HOME REVIEW COMMITTEE 430.80)
V
The City Clerk presented a communication from the Assistant City Administrator.and the Director of
Special Projects regarding formation of a Mobile Home Review Committee.
The.Director of Special Projects presented a staff report.
Discussion was held by Council and staff regarding composition of the proposed board, application
process and length of term.
Page 14-Council/Agency Minutes- 10/25/93
Liaison Appointments °
The Mayor appointed Councilmembers Bauer, Silva and Sullivan to serve as liaison the Mobile Home
Review Committee
A motion was made by Sullivan, seconded by Leipzig, to establish a nine member Mobile Home
Review Committee for the period January, 1994 to July 1, 1995, to include three mobile home park
owners or their managers (with preference to Huntington Beach residents), three Huntington Beach
mobile home residents, and three residents of the city without ties to or financial interests in mobile
homes; Council liaison committee to review applications and make recommendations rega. ling
appointments to the full council, and directed that the Mobile Home Review Committee report on a
quarterly basis to Council with the first quarter report to recommend their goals and objectives to be
ratified by Council. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES::: Moulton-Patterson,Wnchell, Silva, Sullivan, Leipzig
NOES: Robitaille.
ABSENT: Bauer
ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION
(City Council) ORDINANCE NO. 3212-ADOPTED -GRAFFITI VANDALISM (640.10)
" = The City Clerk presented Ordinance No.3212 for Counci_I adoption-"AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 17.10. OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO GRAFFITI VANDALISM." (Includes a reward and ensures
prompt removal of graffiti.) -
A motion was made by Leipzig, seconded by Moulton-Patterson, to adopt Ordinance No.3212. The
motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Moulton Patterson,Wnchell, Sullivan, Leipzig
- NOES: Robitaille, Silva
- ABSENT: Bauer
(City Council) ORDINANCE NO. 3213 -ADOPTED -RESTAURANT,AMUSEMENT AND
ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS (640.10)
The City Clerk presented Ordinance No.3213 for Council adoption-"AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY
AMENDING CHAPTER 5.44, PERTAINING TO RESTAURANT, AMUSEMENT AND
ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS." (Ensures constitutionality and to better withstand legal challenges.)
The City Attorney corrected a typographical error in the ordinance in the section pertaining to 5.44.025
night club patron age restrictions as it is governed by federal law.
2;g -
W'
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.
19
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AC ION .,
crrr LRx
Date October 25, 1993
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator \ c A
Prepared by: Ray Silver, Assistant City Administrator
Mike Adams, Director of Special Project
Subject: Formation of a Mobile Home Review Board
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
On September 27, 1993, the City Council conducted a workshop on mobile home issues. At the
conclusion of the meeting, Council directed staff to schedule for discussion the formation of a
Mobile Home Review Board.
RECOMMENDATION
Create a limited term Mobile Home Review Board as outlined in the report.
ANALYSIS
There are presently 19 mobile home parks in the city of Huntington Beach. These parks
accommodate 3,094 mobile home spaces with a total population in excess of 4,500. Mobile home
parks provide affordable housing for many of the city's senior citizen population and entry level
home ownership opportunities for many young people.
The concerns of the mobile home community have always been a high priority in this community.
Therefore, any role the city can play in facilitating meaningful resolve to conflicting issues of
concern should be fully explored. The establishment of a Mobile Home Review Board may
provide all parties with a means to discover solutions to the numerous problems associated with
mobile home parks.
RCA
Mobile Home Review Board
Page -2-
The purpose of a Mobile Home Review Board could be very broad or focused. In order to
address the immediate concerns in the city of Huntington Beach, staff recommends that the Board
explore the following issues.
• Park Acquisition
• Rent Stabilization
• Zoning Code Amendments (Article 927)
• Financial Assistance
• Park Improvements
Staff recommends that by focusing on a limited number of issues, the board can concentrate on
the major issues. Other state and local organizations have been formed for many of the individual
tenant and owner concerns. Also, due to the city's fiscal condition, limited staffing and materials
can be devoted to this effort. Staff recommends that the board be established for one-year
commencing on January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1994. The board should be comprised of
seven representatives appointed by the City Council. The make-up of the board should be two
representatives from the mobile home park owners, three residents of mobile homes, and two
residents of the city with no ties or interest in mobile homes. In addition, Council should appoint
two Council members as liaisons and one staff member.
This Mobile Home Review Board should not serve as an arbitrator in tenant/landlord disputes,
nor investigate complaints by either party. They may however recommend that such an
arbitration body be created, but the city should maintain an "arms length" relationship in such
matters.
The Board should report to Council on a quarterly basis with a final recommendation report
submitted at the end of 1994.
Staff will be prepared to discuss this or other concepts with Council at the October 25, 1993
meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Letter from the Huntington Beach Mobile Homeowner Association dated
October 11, 1993.
' I
Huntington Beach Mobilehome Owners Association
P.O. Box 7975
Huntington Beach, CA 92615
(714) 960-6100
ode D
0
Mike Adams October 11,1993
City Hall G\ON'5 G
2000 Main St. N�N�\N OFF\CE
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 OF
Dear Mr. Adams,
In the ongoing efforts of the Huntington Beach Mobilehome Owners
Association to provide a stable living environment for residents of
mobile home parks in the city, we offer our views on the make-up and
duties of the Mobile Home Review Board.
1 . The nine member Board would be selected by the City Council,
three mobile home park owners, three residents of mobile homes
and three at-large members who have no ties to or interests in
mobile homes or mobile home parks. All members would be residents
of Huntington Beach for no less than two years and would be
selected from lists containing the names of five nominees from
each group, park owners and residents. The at-large members would
be selected by the City Council in a manner determined by City
Council
2. The Board would investigate properly filed complaint forms by
park owners or mobile home owners to determine if an existing
state, county or city code, law or ordinance has been violated.
If an affirmative determination is reached, the Board would
notify the City Council, in writing, as to its findings and
recommendation for resolution.
3 . The Board would make recommendations to the City Council for the
establishment of city ordinances when state, county or city laws
are silent or non-existent and there is an obvious need for such
an ordinance.
4 . The Board would act as arbitrator in conflicts between park
management/owner and residents in which a specific law has not
been violated or does not exist.
5. Assist other city commissions, departments, committees or staff
in the exercise of their duties when those duties are involved in
mobile homes or mobile home parks.
Except for item 5, all actions taken by the Board would require a
majority vote of the members of the Board.
The Huntington Beach Mobilehome Owners Association sincerely
hopes that this information will be of some assistance to you.
sincerely,
Ron Laramie
President,
HBMOA
cc: Mayor Winchell
Members of the City Council
City Administrator
MISSION STATEMENT
This committee has been created to investigate the various issues
concerning mobile home park ownership and residency. The
committee will make recommendations to Council in an attempt to
seek resolve to disputes in a fair and equitable manner to all parties
involved.
Y l
MR. & MRS. JAMES P. BARKER
Los Amigos Mobile Home Park
18601 Newland Street, Space 22
Huntington Beach, CA 92646-1872
May 19, 1995
Mayor Victor Leipzig
City Hall
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Honorable Leipzig:
My wife and I want to thank you and the City Council for the Mobile Home Review Committee
and hope you will see your way clear to elevate it to a permanent status. During their short
tenure, the Committee has brought about changes that have produced results for both sides, not
just the mobile home owners. .
We look forward to further improvements in the Park Owner/Mobile Home Owner battle.
Yours very truly,
James P. Barker
cc: Ralph Bauer
Shirley Dettloff
Dave Garofalo
Peter Green
Tom-Hari-non
Jim Silva
Dave Sullivan, Mayor tempore
Mike Uberuaga, City Administrator
Gail Hutton, City Attorney
LA`I../�"
GOLDEN STAif MOBILhOME OWNERS LEAGUE, INC.
G11021 MAGNOLIA BOULEVARD,GARDEN GROVE,CAUFORNIA
P.O.BOX 876,GARDEN GROVE,CALIFORNIA 92642
M (714)826-4071 1-800-888-1727
"A Homeowners Association"
April 18, 1995
Mayor Victor Leipzig
Huntington Beach City Hall
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mayor:
The Huntington Beach Mobilehome Review Committee has served your community well.
It has not only performed its mandated duties with professionalism, compassion and astute
deliberation, it has served as an educational forum for Homeowners and Park Owners alike.
This panel has become a model to the neighboring cities of Huntington Beach. The City
of Stanton has plans underway, at this time, to put into place an advisory Committee patterned
after the Huntington Beach Mobilehome Review Committee.
It is my understanding that the Committee is approaching it's Sunset. I strongly urge you
and the City to continue the existence of this vital entity for the expression and resolution of
differences with the Mobilehome Community and the preservation of justice and dignity.
Sincerely,
/&�av ennessy
President GSMOL
cc: Members of the City Council
Y-L-
April 14, 1995 -
Re: Mobile Home Review Committee/Board
Honorable Mayor/City Council Members
Huntington Beach City Hall
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mr. Mayor& City Council Members:
I would like to see the Mobile Home Review Committee continued and changed to the status of
a continuing Board. As the original author of this concept, that was actually my intent, and now
more than even, is almost a necessity for the protection of the mobile home lifestyle within
Huntington Beach plus its contribution as affordable housing.
Many of you already know me personally from my previous involvement with not only the
mobile home issues, but as Transportation Commissioner as well. Other may only know of my
name and from the fact I was the first appointee to this Mobile Home Review Committee until
was forced to resign because of an unexpected career change.
The need does indeed exist however to have this tool within City Hall for the benefit of all
concerned. Park owners and residents alike are to benefit from this wiliness to sit down and to
listen to all sides on an issue. Plus, finally have the avenues to resolve any problems or
concerns that may arise. Prior to the Mobile Home Review Committee, differences were
handled with an iron hand, an attitude that the mobile home owner has no rights and even less
money to fight it. So some unscrupulous park owners simply did whatever they wanted. And
today, we're still paying for that attitude, and surly will again, perhaps as a retaliation, if the
Review Committee does not exist.
Therefore, please consider my advice, understand the consequences that may take place if not
allowed to continue and make the Huntington Beach Mobile Home Committee a permanent
Board.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
John Sisker
80 Huntington Street RECEIVED
Number 266
Huntington Beach APR- 2 01995
CA 92648
(714) 536-3850 DEPARTMENT OF
/ _ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
i/ cc: Mobile Home Review Committee
April 14, 1995
Huntington Beach Mobile Home Review Board
Go 2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
To Whom It May Concern:
As the original author or the Mobile Home Review Board, I wish to add input to the intended priorities
you may wish to pursue in the future. This is in no way intended to tell you how to conduct your
business, or even your internal procedures, it is simply a suggested guideline based on my expense in
the mobile home area.
As many of you know, I am a 37 year resident of Pacific Mobile Home Park. But furthermore, I have
been involved in both the public and private sector in urban planning for over 22 years. After a degree
from the University of California at Irvine, I have been associated with such groups as the Irvine
Company, Missions Viejo Company, Walt Disney Company and the City and County of Orange. And
this was in addition to my appointment to the Huntington Beach Transportation Commission in
addition to a number of the Orange County Transportation Authority Fixed Guideway Agency and
Urban Rail Working Group.
I respectfully would like to assign priorities if the Review Board is to function priorities in light in today's
pending areas of concern.
One, is to make the Huntington Beach Mobile Home Review Committee into a permanent and
continuing Board. Secondly, is to emphasize the internal working of a resident park purchase board.
Perhaps the City could look into the feasibility of first-right of refusal which contrary to popular belief
no one currently have the right to.
And thirdly, look into the City/Mobilehome Review Board involvement into leases. Enclosed is an
article and rebuttal that emphases the need for such City involvement. I feel in all fairness and legal
ethics, perhaps the Review Board can come up with an equitable lease.
l
Naturally, I will be available formally if so desired. I suggest you take me up on my offer or once again
we will just continue to be undermined by these political money hunger groups.
Sincerely.
RE
Lv' �GL
k ohn Sisker C E I V E D
80 Huntington Street APR 20
Space 266 1995
Huntington Beach DEPARTMENT OF
CA 92648 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
(714) 536-3850
1
to
0
zjn �-
0-9
May 18, 1995 rr--1 W
g�
rn
Z
Mr: Dan Bruening
Staff Liasion
Mobile Home Review Committee
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648
Gentlemen: Subject: Mobile Home Review Committee
I am writing this letter as GSMOL Chapter 150 President (Rancho Del Rey
Mobile Home Estates) and also as a Homeowner in the same park.
I believe the Mobile Home Review Committee has been.an enlighting factor
for both Home Owners and Park Owners. As a direct result of .the Committee
the residents of Rancho Del Rey probably saved expense for legal fees
regarding an adjustment of sewer/trash fee increase along with a rent
increase. The problem was brought before the committee and was quickly
resolved. I am also aware of other items that have been accomplished -
communication has probably been the biggest.
In view of the number of residents in mobile home parks within the City
of Huntington Beach, I feel the cost ratio to the City is small compared
to the achievements - and I am aware the City funds have been affected by
the County bankruptcy.
I appreciate all the time everyone has spent in attending meetings and I
thank the Council for authorizing same and hope they can see the posti.ive
side and continue it as a permanent committee.
Cordially,.�L�
Ann Nelson
GSMOL Chapter 150 President
Rancho Del Rey Mobile Home Estates
16222 Monterey Lane # 68
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649
Phone (714) 840 8917 - Home
Phone (714) 547 7695 - Work
AN/h
RECEIVED
Huntington By The Sea MAY 1995
Mobilehome Owners Association
21851 Newland• Huntington Beach,CA 92646 1)^1"«�'RT+�`E OF
Telephone:(714)536-3623 ECON01MIC DEVELOPMENT
May 18, 1995
Mr. Dan Bruening
Staff Liaison
Mobile Home Review Committee
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach CA, 92648
Dear Mr. Bruening,
I am writing on behalf of the Home Owners Association and the residents of Huntington
By The Sea Mobile Home Park.
We want to thank the Review Committee for their work since its inception. We can assure
you that there have been noticeable improvements in communications with management,
and with the general upkeep of the park. management has been more receptive to
compromises on issues that arise from time to time, and we find in some cases, we can and
do work as a team.
With this in mind, we ask that the Review Committee become a permanent Board of the .
city, using the existing members of the committee. The experience and background
knowledge of present members should not be wasted.
We thank you in advance for your efforts on our behalf.
SincFy,
Sebez
President
16222 Monterey Lane #298
Huntington Beach, CA, 92649 RECEIVED
May 18, 1995 MAY 1995
DEPARTMENT OF
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Dan Bruening
Staff Liaison
Mobile Home Review Committee
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mr. Bruening:
I want to repeat what I said at a recent City Council meeting-in
regard to the Mobile Home Review Committee. In the 17 months
during which this Committee has existed, much good has been done
for various parks, mine included. Much more needs to be done. and
I think the committee has a good idea now of what needs to be done.
I urge the City Council to continue this committee. We mobile
home owners need your help! .
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Grayce TD Xvi�
President
Rancho Del Rey
Homeowners Association
May 18 , 1995
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
The City of Huntington Beach
FROM : Alice L . Shaw , President , GSMOL Chapter
Huntington Harbour Mobile Estates
16400 Saybrook: Lane , #1
Huntington Beach , CA 92649
RE : Mobile Home Review Committee
o This letter is to request the continuance of the Mobile
Home Review Committee as a permanent committee . (Our
Huntington Harbour GSMOL and HBMOA members requested me to
make the foregoing statement .)
o Allow the present members of the Committee to remain ,
if they wish to do so , for a designated period of time while
the Committee is restructured .
o Change the "3-3-3" - composition of the Committee . 3
mobile home owners representing thousands seems an unfair
representation gvh.en contrasted with 3 park: owners
representing 'a very few. Also , the 3 citizens-at-large seem
to have an enormous lack of. k:nowledge concerning mobile home
living ! Future citizens-at-large must have some
understanding about this unique living arrangement .
o Committee members should be appointed on a rotating
basis--serve �-3 years , while new members are
appointed/elected to learn and serve , etc . Perhaps 7 - 8
Committee members total , with 4 mobile home owners , park:
owners , 2 to 3 citizens-at-large .
o Frequency of meetings might be cut to 6 times per year ,
with provision for calling a meeting when deemed necessary .
o Limit pubic speakers to 3 - 5 minutes AND HOLD TO
THIS! Also , speakers' must be Huntington Beach
residents/landowners , NOT hired spokespersons for a select
group ! (Vicki Talley , the Park: Owners' hired
representative , is often allowed to spec-k for as long as 13
minutes , voicing MISinformation , which cannot be disputed
until mobile home owners have time to research her
misinformation .)
Although I have owned a mobile home in Huntington Harbour for only a months, I have
attended Mobile Home Review Committee meetings, and many City Council meetings. I
applaud the City Council for your patience (and wisdom) in scheduling public speakers first
at Council meetings, and for your sense of fairness in the establishment of the Mobile
Home Review Committee. Both actions are conducive to preventive activity rather than
curative.
A
Mobile Home Review Comm.
A. Shaw
Page 27, of 2 pages
The thousands of mobile home owners in Huntington Beach (and elsewhere, of course) are
at a disadvantage unless they have a voice and someone at government levels to listen.
Their "mobile homes" are NOT MOBILE, but they are their HOMES: The handful of park
owners are wealthy. They consider the parks business ventures (rightly, so, naturally!)
And, like the feudal lords of old, they have almost complete control over the thousands of
"subjects" in their domain. These "subjects" own their homes, in which they have invested
considerable financial, emotional and physical interest. Almost all mobile home owners
have chosen their way of living because of financial necessity, yet the park owners
continue to raise rents, usually above the CPI, even in a static or recessive economy. The
amount of intimidation park owners have exercised over mobile home owners is excessive.
The tears of losing the "space" upon which their home sits is considerable. Imagine
wondering whether the home you have made for almost 30 years might be taken from you at
the whim of an investment entrepreuner, or the heir of a park owner, who now wants to sell
the property. Or, think about senior citizens living in a park that changed from "senior" to
"family", with all the obvious changes that seniors hoped to escape when they first
contracted to live in that park.
Whether or not the City Council is empowered to act upon problems that face mobile home
dwellers, these thousands of citizens deserve and need a viable committee to hear the
problems that arise. One year of such a committee does not solve all problems, as we all
must be aware. Please remember your wisdom in establishing the Mobile Home Review
Committee and the example that has been set for other cities to follow. We need this
Committee as a valuable resource and appreciate your vote for its continuance.
1
May 18, 1995
Mr. Dan Bruening
Community Development
Huntington Beach City Hall
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Mr. Bruening:
The members of our Home Owners Association asked me to express our appreciation of..
the work being done by the Huntington Beach Mobile Home Review Committee. As home
owners we have at last received recognition of the problems facing us and feel the future is
hopeful. Many of us chose this lifestyle as the most affordable manner to five out our fives. In
too many instances this is no longer true.
There have been many positive changes of attitude on the part of Park owners due to the
existence of this Committee. We all hope this will continue and have this effect throughout the
City.
Therefore, we urge the City Council to make the Review Committee permanent.. To
protect the many elderly, who have lived in their homes for up to 30 years, we need this
Committee to save them from financiat ruin.
Sincerely,
Barbara Laramie
President
Pacific Park GSMOL Chapter 0329 RECEIVED
80 Huntington Street, Space 461
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 MAY 191995
DEPARTMENT OF
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Richard Zielinski May 17, 1995
7850 Slater Ave. #80
Huntington Beach, Calif 92647
(714) 842-5050
Mr. Dan Bruening - Staff Liason
Humtington Beach Mobilehome Review Committee
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA. 92648
Dear Mr. Bruening:
This letter is in regards to the Mobilehome Review Committee.
I am a resident in a mobilehome park and feel that the Mobilehome Review Committee is
a very positive entity. The existence of this committee is beneficial to both the residents and
the park owners. In addition, this forum allows the city to be active with an intrical part
of its residents - the mobilehome resident.
Please continue the Mobilehome Review Committee.
Thank you for your time.
Regards,
chard ski
RECEIVED
MAY 191995
DEPARTMENT OF
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
DAN BRUNING
MOBILE HOME REVIEW COMMITTEE
2000 MAIN STREET
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92646
Mr. Dan Bruning:
We are writing to you because we understand that you are the liason officer for the
continuation of the Mobile Home Review Committee meetings.
We have found that these meetings have been extremely helpful to us in the past and
do not envision life in a mobile home park, especially this one, without the support of
the committee. Who will we go to???? THE MILITIA//Somebody or something has to
overseer the problems with management and Mobile Home Owner. We will see that
we have our rights one way or the other.
My family has had numerous problems with Mr. Hexburg and his managers, but since
he knows that we are going to the meeetings, he has not given us any trouble.
If the Review Committee is not in force, then we are at the mercy of these managers
because we have no one to help us. Before we started going to the meetings, I was
sitting at home with the camcorder and tape-player on, waiting for them to make their
inspections, spying on us and harrassing us until we.thought that we would have to
start a LAW SUIT to get some piece of mind.
If you have a SAY SO in whether this committee stays intact, we would hope that you
will let them continue, for all our piece of minds.5/17/95
YOURS SINCERELY,
MARILYN AND DON ALLEN
9850 Garfield, Sp. 73
BROOKFIELD MANOR
Huntington Beach,CA.92646
RECEIVED
MAY 191995
DEPARTMENT OF
ECONONINC DEVELOPMENT
ZH
HBMOA- HUNTINGTON BEACH MOBILEHOME OWNERS ASSN.
May 16, 1995
Victor Leipzig, Mayor
City Hall-Huntington Beach Re: Mobile Home Review
2000 Main Street Committee
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Honorable Mayor Leipzig:
As President of the Huntington Beach Mobilehome Owners Association
(HBMOA) , it is my pleasure, on behalf of myself and the many thousands
of mobilehome owners in our wonderful City, to extend to you our
heartfelt thanks for recognizing the problems that do exist in the
mobilehome community, by forming the Mobile Home Review Committee.
Much has been accomplished in the past sixteen months and the results
have been gratifying, especially in one or two of the parks where,
before the Review Committee, the only line of communication between the
home owner and the park owner was the annual notice that the rent was
going to be increased substantially. Today, because of the MHRC,
changes in attitude on both sides have made noticeable improvements in
lifestyle for the home owners in these parks.
There is still much to be done, with many park owners still to be
reached. We, (the HBMOA) , feel a permanent Review Board, with authority
to act on issues and complaints, will be the catalyst to getting this
accomplished. We urge you to vote on June 5th to establish a permanent
Board or Commission, with the same nine members as appointees.
Once again, thank you for' hearing- our pleas and thank you for
understanding. We truly respect your judgement, and above all, admire
your patience.
Sincerely,
BEAOI N�ILEf�� OW EFTS ASSN.
Steve Gul loge RECEIVED .'
President
MAY 191995
cc: Dave Sullivan, Mayor Tempore
Council Members DEPARTMENT OF
Michael Uberuaga, City Administrator FOONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Gail Hutton,- City Attorney
Dan Bruening Staff Liaison
P.O. BOX 7975 HUNTINGTON EACH, CA 92615 PH: (714) 960-5342 FAX: (714) 960-5050
I
( q3s0 WARD 57. �# 9g
1-{ v Al T/A/G To ry c l�� C f�
MR. 3)A Al B R vEIVIAIG
2 000 M191AI ST.
R 1-fR, )-9R of IV AlG
a&
r
tke-
•• B M 0A-
HUNTINGTON BEACH MOSILEHOMPI OWNERS: ASSN.
--1
C.T1 G'f �y
TO: Victor Leipzig, Mayot- DATE: June 5, 1955 o o::;
(Java Su 1l iven, Mayor Pro-Tom M
Counai lmembero; Flo: MH Review Committeeo n T rn m
Ralph Bauer E--14 Consent Calend _ "
Shirley Oattloff Counoil Agenda: 6/5;
Peter Orman LLD
Dave Garafalo
Tom Herman
FRMs HBMDA y
:;::�:;r#1k*y�'.'(`Tyl.''JT"1`�:;�Cl�f 7�G'1`M•1`:;t���,r�,����*#�k�k�;yF��k����+�k�kkkko;��,cs��;c�,c�c��+�����'Ic�k��k���k��',c�%��'I��
Om behalf of the members of the Huntington Basch Mobilshome Owners Assn,
we would like to thank the Council for supporting the mobile home ownara
in our attempt to improve relationships with the Park Owners in
Huntington beaoh.
Your dooision to orhosts the MHRC in 1993, woo the vehiolm that brought
the home owmaro end park ownero to the soma table. The reoults have
lbman trememdoucly positive, but much is yet to be dons.
We ask that thin Council move forward with a wnonimaus vote tonight., to
make the MHI=iC a parmanent Board, as opposed to continuation for a period
of six months as raoommended in E-14 by the oirector• of Community
Oesvdldptllent.
Again, thank you for your support, past and present. Please finalize
whet you began in 1993. . . . .empoworing the mobile home owners to have a
measure of. control of our liFeatyle.
8inaeroly,•
HMnMnM
BEACH M1 nhCW 002MABC ATION
Steve Gulleag Sandra Colo
4�4� . z7x��'�ixs1L
Norms L. Brownell Mon Laramie
, 1
P.Q. BOX 7976 HUNYINQTON BEACH, GA 02615 • PH: (714)0604342 FAX: (714) 960,6060
i
RECEIVED
May 18, 1995 I"iqY J i995
Mr. Scott Foster EM'NO�tt,PDEVE OPMENT
7850 Slater Ave. Space#54
Huntington Beach, CA. 92647
Mr. Dan Bruening - Staff Liaison
Mobilehome Review Committee
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main St.
Huntington Beach, CA. 92648
Dear Mr. Bruening:
This letter is in support for the Mobilehome Review.Committee.
I believe this committee is very valuable and should be continued.
Sincerely,
Scott Foster
V
i
'EcE "'
MAY
ECONOM'
ol
i �2• ��iZ� r✓/LGc.tr•
ace-
&oo,
of
'Yew
�� � GU?e� G��s�a�•� ��
4-PIP2.U
>:�
j
/�/(p}'+{(}�
CoJ C ..�-� -"'
�� p..� �� �i i�y�
�� `�-'
��� �� a�
�"
G� '
� . ,.
���c��,
;�� �.
� - i
-J t�`.
1 1
�.;.
9
(i¢yinia -2. df Ltzman R i
6241 (Wamet c4vs., ::fVo. 151
cqunttnyton Bzacfi, 6al1 f ozrua;S? 647 ;�. ,, .•
t
17
-cac-
tie, r
X
cJC�Ls� ,
V
s -
�')
/,[�
_ �� � �
,� ' � ,� ��
cc�� �
U�
� 2�
HBMOA-
HUNTINGTON BEACH MOBILEHOME OWNERS ASSN.
May 16, 1995
Victor Leipzig, Mayor
City Hall-Huntington Beach Re: Mobile Home Review
2000 Main Street Committee
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Honorable Mayor Leipzig:
As President of the Huntington Beach Mobilehome Owners Association
(HBMOA) , it is my pleasure, on behalf of myself and the many.thousands
of ,mobilehome owners in our wonderful City, to extend to you our
heartfelt thanks for recognizing the problems that do exist in the
mobilehome community, by forming the Mobile Home Review Committee.
Much has been accomplished in the past sixteen months and the results
have been gratifying, especially in one or two of the parks where,
before the Review Committee, the only line of communication between the
home owner and the park owner was the annual notice that the rent was
going to be increased substantially: Today, because of the MHRC,
changes in attitude on both sides have made noticeable improvements in
lifestyle for the home owners in these parks.
There is still much to be done, with many park owners still to be
reached. We,(the HBMOA), feel a permanent Review Board, with authority
to act on issues and complaints, will be the catalyst to getting this
accomplished. We urge you to vote on June 5th to establish a permanent
Board or Commission, with the same nine members as appointees.
Once again, thank you for hearing our pleas and thank you for
understanding. We truly respect your judgement, and above all, admire
your patience.
Sincerely,
BEACH MOBIL EHO04E Oii 433S ASSN.
Steve Gullage
President
cc: Dave Sullivan, Mayor Tempore
Council Members
Michael Uberuaga, City Administrator
Gail Hutton, City Attorney C•:'. 1 1995
Dan Bruening, Staff Liaison
G. XACI-
/1
P.O. BOX 7975 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92615 PH: (714)960-5342 FAX: (714)960-5050
May 18 , 1995
+- J ..
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
The City of Huntington Beach
FROM : Alice L. Shaw, President , GSMOL Chapter I,
Huntington Harbour Mobile Estates .
16400� Saybrook: Lane , #1
Huntington Beach , CA 92649
RE : Mobile Home Review Committee
o This letter is to request the continuance of the Mobile
Home Review Committee as a permanent committee . (Our
Huntington Harbour GSMOL and HBMOA members requested me to
make the foregoing statement .)
o Allow the present members of the Committee to remain ,
if they wish to do so, for a designated period of time while
the Committee is restructured .
o Change the "3-3-3" composition of the Committee . 3
mobile home owners representing thousands seems an unfair
representation when contrasted with 3 park: owners
representing a very few . Also, the 3 citizens-at-large seem
to have an enormous lack of knowledge concerning mobile home
living ! Future citizens-at-large must have some
understanding about this unique living arrangement .
o Committee members should be appointed on a rotating
basis--serve 2-3 years, while new members are
appointed/elected to learn and serve , etc . Perhaps 7 - S
Committee members total , with 4 mobile home owners, 2 park:
owners , 2 to 3 citizens-at-large .
o Frequency of meetings might be cut to 6 times per year ,
with provision for calling a meeting when deemed necessary.
o Limit public speakers to 3 - 5 minutes AND HOLD TO
THIS! Also , speakers must be Huntington Beach
residents/landowners , NOT hired spokespersons for a select
group ! (Vicki Talley , the Park: Owners' hired
representative , is often allowed to speak for as long as 23
minutes , voicing MISinformation , which cannot be disputed
until mobile home owners have time to research her
misinformation .)
Although I have owned a mobile home in Huntington Harbour for only a months, I have
attended Mobile Home Review Committee meetings, and many City Council meetings. I
applaud the City Council for your patience (and wisdom) in scheduling public speakers first
at Council meetings, and for your sense of fairness in the establishment of the Mobile
Home Review Committee. Both actions are conducive to preventive activity rather than
curative.
Mobile Home Review Comm.
A. Shaw
Page 2 of 2 pages
The thousands of mobile home owners in Huntington Beach (and elsewhere, of course) are
at a disadvantage unless they have a voice and someone at government levels to listen.
Their "mobile homes" are NOT MOBILE, but they are their HOMES! The handful of park
owners are wealthy. They consider the parks business ventures (rightly, so,naturally!)
And, like the feudal lords of old, they have almost complete control over the thousands of
"subjects" in their domain. These "subjects" own their homes, in which they have invested
considerable financial, emotional and.physical interest. Almost all mobile home owners
have chosen their way of living because of financial necessity, yet the park owners
continue to raise rents, usually above the CPI, even in a static or recessive economy. The
amount of intimidation park owners have exercised over mobile home owners is excessive.
The fears of losing the "space" upon which their home sits is considerable. Imagine
wondering whether the home you have made for almost 30 years might be taken from you at
the whim of an investment entrepreuner, or the heir of a park owner, who now wants to sell
the property. Or, think about senior citizens living in a park that changed from "senior" to
"family", with all the obvious changes that seniors hoped to escape when they first
contracted to live in that park.
Whether or not the City Council is empowered to act upon problems that face mobile home
dwellers, these thousands of citizens deserve and need a viable committee to hear the
problems that arise. One year of such a committee does not solve all problems, as we all
must be aware. Please remember your wisdom in establishing the Mobile Home Review
Committee and the example that has been set for other cities to follow. We need this
Committee as a valuable resource and appreciate your vote for its continuance.
May 17, 1995
Mayor Vic Leipzig
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mayor Leipzig and City Council Members
We, the undersigned residents of Sea Aira Mobile Home Estates,
respectfully request that you and the Council give serious
consideration to the continuation of the Mobile Home Review
Board on a permanent basis.
When the City Council approved the creation of this Board
. it finally gave mobilehome residents a forum to air problems
and concerns, and in many cases a solution to these issues.
Thank you for considering our request.
Yours truly,
Sea Aira Residents
ITT ALI
.stir
� � .�.1t'rlJ ��� �/1/'����/�ci�/Ii�Q.' /`.�5� �7• G�v'CSCi jZ•l,
-1
May 17, 1995
2;.
Mayor Vic Leipzig ,
City of Huntington Beach ems'
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mayor Leipzig and City Council Members
We, the undersigned residents of Sea Aira Mobile Home Estates,
respectfully request that you and the Council give serious
consideration to the continuation of the Mobile Home Review
Board on a permanent basis.
When the City Council approved the creation of this Board
it finally gave mobilehome residents a forum to air problems
and concerns, and in many cases a solution to these issues.
Thank you for considering our request.
Yours truly,
Sea Aira Residents
U
May 1'.6'- 1995
Mayor Vic Leipzig
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mayor Leipzig and City Council Members
We, the undersigned residents of Sea Aira Mobile Home Estates,
respectfully request that you and the Council give serious
consideration to the continuation of the Mobile Home Review
Board on a permanent basis.
When the City Council approved the creation of this Board
it finally gave mobilehome residents a forum to air problems
and concerns, and in many cases a solution to these issues.
Thank you for considering our request.
Yours truly,
Sea Aira Residents
9 A�
1
W / " U"//
Huntington Beach Mobilehome Owners Association
P.O. Box 7975
Huntington Beach, CA 92615
(714) 960-6100
� 4
so 'Es
D
Mike Adams October 11,1993
1219°s3
City Hall2000 Main 0G�
NG��N 6�ON
St.Huntington Beach, CA 92648
CAI
Dear Mr. Adams,
In the ongoing efforts of the Huntington Beach Mobilehome Owners
Association to provide a stable living environment for residents of
mobile home parks in the city, we offer our views on the make-up and
duties of the Mobile Home Review Board.
1. The nine member Board would be selected by the City Council,
three mobile home park owners, three residents of mobile homes
and three at-large members who have no ties to or . interests in
mobile homes or mobile home parks. All members would be residents
of Huntington Beach for no less than two years and would be
selected from lists containing the names of five nominees from
each group, . park owners and residents. The at-large members would
be selected by the City Council in a manner determined by City
Council
2. The Board would investigate properly filed complaint forms by
park owners or mobile home owners to determine if an existing
state, county or city code, law or ordinance has been violated.
If an affirmative determination is reached, the Board would
notify the City Council, in writing, as to its findings and
recommendation for resolution.
3 . The Board would make recommendations to the City Council for the
, establishment of city ordinances when state, county or city laws
are silent or non-existent and there is an obvious need for such
an ordinance.
4. The Board would act as arbitrator in conflicts between park
management/owner and residents in which a specific law has not
been violated or does not exist.
5. Assist other city commissions, departments,- committees or staff
in the exercise of their duties when those duties are involved in
mobile homes or mobile home parks.
Except for item 5, all actions taken by the Board would require a
majority vote of the members of the Board.
The Huntington Beach Mobilehome Owners Association sincerely
hopes that this information will be of some assistance to you.
Sincerely,
Ron Laramie
President,
HBMOA
cc: Mayor Winchell
Members of the City Council
City Administrator
y
... ...... �.
COVER PAGE
REQUEST FOR LATE SUBMITTAL
(To accompany RCA)
Department: Economic Development [Subject: Mobile Home Review tee,
Council Meeting Date: June 3, 1996 Date of This Request: May 24, 1996
REASON (Why is this RCA being submitted late?):
Changes and clarifications suggested by the City Attorney and Administration were added
to the staff report after it was submitted.
EXPLANATION (Why is this RCA necessary to this agenda?):
The City Council gave previous direction to the Mobile Home Review Committee (MHRC) to
return with an enabling ordinance and by-laws by June 5, 1996. The MHRC wants to meet
this deadline.
CONSEQUENCES (How shall delay of this RCA adversely impact the City?):
There is no direct financial or administrative impact to the City. The MHRC is responding
to a Council directive to return prior to June 5, 1996.
..... .....
Si nature: O Approved O Denied O Approved O Denied
Initials
Required
Department Head . Asst. City Administrator City Administrator
REQLATE.DOC 07/14/94