Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMcDONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY COMPANY - 1996-07-01(11j 10/06/97 - Council/Agency Agenda - Page 11 E-9. (City Council) Approval of Amendment No. 1 To Agreement The Contract With Engineering Resources, Inc. To Perform Public Works Engineering, Development Processing And Inspection Services - (600.10) 1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and Engineering Resources Inc. for Plan Checking and Development Processing to provide an additional $865,000 for development processing, engineering project delivery facilitation, environmental document review and construction inspection services for proposed private and public facilities on a time and material basis. The new compensation cap will not exceed $1,514,500; and 2. Continue to accept the current and approved Insurance and Letter of Credit (covering the deductible) that accompanies the current contract; and 3. Instruct the Finance Division to open another Purchase Order for $865,000 to fund the Engineering Resources Contract ($650,000 from account E-AA-PW-411-3-90-00 and $215,000 from Account No. E-EW- PW-921-3-90-00). Submitted by the Public Works Director [Approved 7-0] E-10. (City Council) Aonrove The Substitution Of Bonds And Subdivision Aareement - Tract No. 14980 - From PLC Land Company To Annandale Associates L.P. - (Holly-Seacliff Development Agreement Area) elo Goldenwest Street - slo Ellis - nlo Ernest Avenue - (420.60) 1. Release PLC Land Company Subdivision Agreement And Bond Nos. 3SM89012400 and 3SM88987900, the securities furnished for Faithful Performance, Labor & Material, and Monuments respectively; 2. Accept Annandale Associates, L.P. Subdivision Agreement and Bond Nos. 1558120, 1558121, (Insurance Company of the West) the securities furnished for Faithful Performance, Labor & Materials, and Monuments respectively, and approve and authorize execution by the Mayor and City Clerk of the Subdivision Agreement and file the bonds with the City Treasurer; and instruct the City Clerk to notify the previous developer, PLC Land Company of this action, and the City Treasurer to notify the bonding company of this action. Submitted by the Communitv Development Director [Approved 7-0] E-11. (City Council) Amendment No. 3 To The Contract With EDAW, Inc. And Amendment No. 3 To The Reimbursement Agreement With McDonnell Doing las Realty Company For Preparation Of The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan And Environmental Im act Report - (ED 600.10 & MC 600.10) 1. Approve & authorize execution by the Mayor and City Clerk of Amendment No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and EDAW, Inc. for Planning Consulting Services for the Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Parr Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report, for a total contract fee not to exceed $303,099; and 2. Approve and authorize execution by the Mayor and City Clerk of Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan and Environmental Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and McDonnell Douglas Realty Company. Submitted by the Community Development Director [Approved 7-0] CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK CITY CLERK LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL REGARDING ITEM APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVED ITEM DATE: a2�h, k ---R 1, / q 9 -7 - TO: N,�=I� /''IZ)if e C�D/7?P",V ATTENTION: Name Din Z.0 WDGill &VA. 6"'5'/AQi0EPARTMENT: Street ,Zpyg QU( REGARDING. � F4 t�l/T 13 City, state, zip /QEI/I7$1,1 5rY7?C/Vr f}GRk'G-177AW7- See Attached Action Agenda Item _1- d _ M c0aVAI,e4 . 00,0r.«S /Pt,#.47Y tliV_, Date of Approval 1 D 1CaZ 9 -7 Enclosed For Your Records Is An Executed Copy Of The Above Referenced Item For Your Records. &tf2.(.C,& 47 Connie Brockwav City Clerk / Attachments: Action Agenda Page ✓ Agreement Bonds Insurance RCA Deed Other Remarks: ACT-1 DA/ CC: Z9UaA/ eaen. AffV. ✓ �� _� h`aEi]v R _ Name tffA /7 a0 -.# 1 Department 0 RCA 1 Agreemi Insuranf V Other ✓ Dame Department RCA ,agreement Insurance Other / f' eI?A/Z `, d4Min/.►suev ✓� _ _ eZ Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other / Risk Management Department Insurance Copy v G: Followup,'agrmts transltr ( Telephone: 714.536.52271 1 Council/Agency Meeting Held: i z t oo' s Q t_7b Deferred/Continued to: booa o me 0 Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved 0 Denied City CI k's Signature Council Meeting Date: October 6, 1997 Department ID Number: CD 97-48 1-- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administ a ��r�G,_ PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Community Development Directo�'h�y SUBJECT: Amendment No. 3 to the Contract with EDAW, Inc. and Amendment No. 3 to the Reimbursement Agreement with McDonnell Douglas Realty Company for Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and EIR Statement of Issue, Funding Source, Recommended Action, Alternative Action(s), Analysis, Environmental Status, Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is a request for a third amendment to the existing contract between the City of Huntington Beach and EDAW, Inc. and the reimbursement agreement between the City and McDonnell Douglas Realty Company (MDRC) for preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Staff, with the assistance of EDAW, and the agreement of McDonnell Douglas Realty Company (the applicant) have expanded the original scope of work to allow for EDAW and it's sub -consultants to take on a greater portion of the Specific Plan preparation which was originally to be completed by the applicant. This amendment is to cover services which were mistakenly overlooked in preparation of the last contract amendment. Staff has worked with EDAW and the applicant in establishing an appropriate scope of work for preparation of the Specific Plan and EIR and is submitting the contract amendments, reflecting the additional work and associated costs, for City Council approval. The amendment is for additional services in an amount not to exceed $25,650 which when added to the previously amended total contract cost of $277,449, brings the total contract amount to $303,099. Funding Source: Consulting costs are to be borne by MDRC through approval of the amendment to the reimbursement agreement. Therefore, there will be no effect on the City's budget. • REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER:, CD 97-48 Motion to: 1. "Approve Amendment No. 3 to the professional services agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and EDAW, Inc. for additional services in the amount of $25,650 to prepare the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report, for a total contract fee not to exceed $303,099. 2. "Approve Amendment No. 3 to the reimbursement agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and McDonnell Douglas Realty Company for additional consulting services in the amount of $25,650 to prepare the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report, for a total agreement fee not to exceed $303,099." Alternative cio s• The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. Deny the request and direct staff accordingly. Analysis: The McDonnell Douglas Realty Company (MDRC) submitted an application for approval of a specific plan and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the McDonnell Centre Business Park. The proposed specific plan area consists of the entire 307 acre area bounded by Rancho Road and the US Navy railroad right of way on the north, Springdale Street on the east, Solsa Avenue on the south, and Bolsa Chica Street on the west. The objectives of the specific plan are (1) to prevent further piecemeal development of the area; (2) allow for development of a mix of industrial, commercial/retail, and office uses that is compatible with the existing area; (3) create a distinguishable character for the McDonnell Centre Business Park area through the creation and implementation of design guidelines; and (4) facilitate future development of the specific plan area by allowing subsequent projects, that are consistent with the specific plan, to be processed without additional entitlement. On .July 1, 1996, the City Council approved the contract between the City and EDAW, Inc., and the reimbursement agreement between the City and MDRC for preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and EIR. The original contract and reimbursement agreement covered environmental consulting services, review of a draft specific plan (to be provided by McDonnell Douglas Realty Company), and preparation of design guidelines for the specific plan area. C1397-48.130C -2- 08/29I97 9:01 AM 0 • REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE. October 6, 1997 _ DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 97-48 On September 2, 1997, the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the EDAW contract and MDRC reimbursement agreement to cover additional unanticipated revisions, supplemental traffic analyses and staff coordination meetings required for completion of the draft EIR and Specific Plan as well as graphics and presentation displays which were not anticipated in the original contract. Development of the McDonnell Business Park Specific Plan and EIR has been a long complicated process which has required more revisions, supplemental analysis, and staff/project coordination meetings than originally anticipated. After preparation of the last augment, it was determined that a previous service amendment was overlooked and not included in the last amendment request. Since the last augment, EDAW and its subconsultants have prepared the final EIR and the project has gone before the Planning Commission for a recommendation. This amendment has been prepared by EDAW, under the guidance of staff, and consists of a supplemental scope of work to address the additional work needed to complete the project. A breakdown of the additional services and associated costs is provided as Exhibit A of the amendments to the service agreements (Attachments No. 1 and 2). EDAW's project manager and sub -consultant team have an understanding of the City's issues and are responsive to staffs concerns. They have consistently provided a quality product on schedule and work well as an extension of staff. Staff has worked with EDAW in establishing the revised scope of work and recommends that the City Council approve the contract amendment reflecting the additional work and associated cost in the amount of $25,650, as well as the amendment to the reimbursement agreement with MDRC to cover the additional costs. _r •rrr-r The selection of a consultant to prepare planning documents does not constitute a project under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and therefore is not subject to CEQA. However, the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan will be subject to CEQA and will require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The EIR is in the process of being prepared in conjunction with the specific plan and will comply with the provisions of CEQA. C1397-48.130C -3- 09126197 1:49 PM 0 0 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: October 6, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 97-48 Amendment No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and EDAW, Inc. for Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and EIR. 2. Amendment No. 3 to the Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and McDonnell Douglas Realty Company for Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and EIR. 3. Insurance Certificates CD97-48.DOC -4- 09126/97 1:51 PM ATTACHMENT 1 AMENDMENT NO.3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND EDAW, INC. FOR PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT THIS AMENDMENT No. 3 is made and entered into the cn- day of 1997, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the City," and EDAW, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor." WHEREAS, the City and Contractor are parties to that certain agreement, dated July 1, 1996, entitled "PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND EDAW, INC. FOR PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT," as amended, which agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as "the Original Agreement," and therein, The parties wish to further amend the Original Agreement to provide for certain changes NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by the City and Contractor as follows: Section 1 of the Original Agreement, entitled "Work Statement," is hereby amended to read as follows: "CONTRACTOR shall provide all services as described in the Scope of Work proposals as Tasks, one (1.0) through four (4.0) including optional tasks, dated April 25, 1996, and all tasks identified in the letter from Jayna Morgan to Herb Fauland dated January 8, 1997, and all tasks identified in the letter from Jayna Morgan to Herb Fauland dated July 28, 1997, and all tasks identified in the letter from Jayna Morgan to Herb Fauland dated May 14, 1997, hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit "A' which Exhibit "A" is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Said services shall sometimes be referred to as "PROJECT." 1 16E2E MX,e- 7- 11V GA97agree:amdedaw3 I D 6 Q a ! O RLS 97-692 _ "CONTRACTOR hereby designates layna Morgan, who shall represent it and be its sole agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement." Section 4 of the Original Agreement, entitled "Compensation," is hereby amended to read as follows: "In consideration of the performance of the consulting services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a fee not to exceed Three Hundred Three Thousand Ninety-nine Dollars ($303,099.00) based upon the fees as stated in Exhibit B." Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the original agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their authorized officers on the date first above written. CONTRACTOR: EDAW, INC. a C lifornia corppo�or�Aattion By: �V` it (print name) Its: (circle one) Chairman/Presiden ice P By: /e (print name) Its: (circle one) Secre Chief Financial Officer Assi. Secretary -Treasurer REVIE D APPROVED: City Administrator 2 0:4:97 agree: amdedau-3 RLS 97-692 9/ 16/97 CITY: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation ATTEST: City Clerk /a a i q APPROVE AS TO FORM: r' ity ttorney ys �7 INITIATED AND APPROVED: -Y xzz, - Director of Community Development 05/14/97 14:02 FAX A60 1046 EDAW INC. 16001/0( L EXHIBIT A EDN May 14, 1997 Landscape Archiucti Mr. Herb Fauland Planning 1,Irban Design City of Runti.ngtan Beach Environmental.";ily 2000 Main Street Site Engineering Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Graphic Design RE: McDONNELL CENTRE BUSIINTSS PARR SPECIFIC PLA.N/EIR - BUDGET AUGMENT Dear Herb: EDAW, Inc.17875 Von Karman A Suicc 400 As a follow up to our meeting last week and our conversation on Monday, I am Irvine, CA 92614 714 660-8044 forwarding this budget augment request for City and MDRC approval This FAX 714 660-1046 request serves as an update to the April 18, 1997 "Draft" request and incorporates additional services performed/to be performed by Adams Associates, WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. (WPA), and EDAW. As you are aware, we are nearing completion of the Specific Plan for the McDonnell Centre Business Park. Mike Adams forwarded an augment request to you, dated April 14, 1997, to cover the costs through completion of the Final Specific Plan. I am formally transmitting this request for $12,500 under this letter. As we discussed, I have also attended bi-monthly project meetings since December of last year, as requested by Melanie Fallon. In a letter dated December 10, 1996 sent to Melanie, I indicated that a budget augment would be necessary to cover the fallowing: 1) my attendance at a total of 12 meetings; 2) preparation of meeting agendas; 3) preparation of meeting minutes; and 4) follow-up coordination with City staff and consultants to ensure action items identified in meetings are implemented. The first project meeting was held an December 13, 1996 and to date, I have attended a total of 10 project meetings. According to the most recent project schedule, we can safely assume that the project will continue at least through to September 1997. Therefore, I am San rmncisco requesting a budget augment for attendance at a total of 10 subsequent bimonthly Alexandria project meetings. The labor cost estimate for 10 additional meetings is $6,250. Adana Denver Fort Collins Huntsville Irvine Orlando Sacramento Seatde London Glasgow Colmar Sophia Andpolis Sydney , Sriabrtnc ;• . Gold Coa s t P:M,nIaol%coafsrwnULAND ooc Melbourne Hone Kan¢ I05/14/97 14:03 F.J�X 71 arl 1046 EDAW INC. _ 21002/003 EDANA Mr. Herb Fauland May 14, 1997 Page 2 . . Additionally, the extended projext schedule and coordination/attendance at bi-monthly project meetings has resulted in the depletion of a substantial portion of EDAW's original expense and word processing budget. As of our April 17, 1997 invoice, 74.73% and 48.94% of EDAW's expense and word processing budgets have been expended. EDAW expenses include such items as phone, fax, mileage, xerox, etc. and are billed to the client direct with no mark-up. Based upon the expected project completion date and additional meetings, EDAW requests $1,900,00 for expenses and $1,000.00 for word processing be added to our remaining budgets. Lastly, on May 6, 1997, WPA submitted an add service request to their existing contract (see page 2 of their attached request). They indicated that the primary factor that was not anticipated in their existing contract/addendum was added analyses caused by the results of the HCM analyses. The addendum cited performance of the HCM analyses, which were initially completed; however, the outcome of the initial findings required a significant amount of added work. The HCM analyses were anticipated to yield less conservative results than the existing ICU analyses, which would have resulted in the scope described in the addendum. The results of The HCM for many location-. and conditions, however, actually were more conservative than the ICU analyses. This caused the need to initiate an iteration process of the HCM analyses in order to attempt to determine if the Level of Service could be improved through changed signal timing. When this process was exhausted, then changes in the mitigation measures were required to address the HCM findings. Added changes in the analyses/report that resulted form the mitigation changes wore also undertaken in the completion of the final report. This added work utilized the remaining budget that was reserved for atmndaneo at hearings and response to EIR comments and, in fact, exceeded the total by approximately S 1,000. They have requested that the $1,000 overage, response to EIR comments, and hearings be addressed through an addendum. Since the amount of work related to meeting attendance and EIR comments is speculative at this time, they may be hest addressed on a time and materials bases with some initial "not to exceed" Free. EDAW believes a $3,000 not to exceed fee: should be adequate to complete the traffic response to comments and attend necessary future meetings/hearings. The above -described work efforts result in a grand total of $9,150 for EDAW, $4,000 for WPA, and $12,500 for Adams Associates. R` N1I60I\COR£iPWAL1.tN'021VJC f05/14/97 14:04 FAX 710 10416 EDAW INC. - IM003/003 EDAY Mr. Herb Fauland May 14, 1997 Page 3 Since thie augment does require Council approval, FDAW needs to receive a leiter from the City or MDRC indicating that the casts for these add services will be covered, If you have any questions or require additional information, please give me or Sally a caU. Thank you for your assistance in processing this request_ Sincerely, t ayna Morgan Senior Associate cc: Melanie Fallon Howard ?elefsky Julie 4sug11 Dick Harlow Mike Adams Steve Sasaki Steve Barker Kim Stra.chan • 1�'6NO-601=ti PkCAU"NOIDOC. MICHAEL C. ADAMS' ASSOCIATES April 14, 1997 Mr. Herb Fauland, Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ' Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 RE: McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Dear Herb: This letter is a follow-up to our conversation on the need to augment the consulting contract, with EDAW, for the Specific Plan. As we discussed the original proposal did not budget for the number of special meetings which have been conducted.' These meetings have now resulted in an extensive list of modifications to the text, maps and graphics of the Specific Plan. I have prepared an augmentation budget to address these additional services along with an itemization of reimbursable expenses to date and included a contingency amount sufficient to cover any additional reimbursable expenses through the completion of the draft Specific Plan. I have discussed the need for this augmentation with 3ayna. She suggested that in order to expedite the request, it should be directed to you for City and McDonnell Douglas review by the April 16th meeting. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me. Sincerely Mike s cc: 3ayna Morgan, EDAW 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 -- f- MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES Adams Associates Proposes to provide the outlined services on a time and materials basis with fees not to exceed the following: Estimated Budget: Text & Graphics Modifications Total:. $4,100 Non Budgeted Meetings Total: $5,400 Reimbursables Total: $1,500 Contingency (For additional Graphic Materials) Total:' $1,500 Total Budget:$12,500 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES Meetings to Date 12-12-96 MDRC 3 hrs. 1-13-97 City Staff 2 hrs. 1-22-97 Dick Harlow 1 hr. 1-22-97 Herb Fauland 1 hr. 2-27-97 Team Meeting 3 hrs. 3-3-97 Dick Harlow/ 2 hrs. Herb Fauland 3-3-97 MDRC 2 hrs. 3-5-97 Team Meeting 2 firs. 3-13-97 City (Landscaping) 2 hrs. 3-13-97 City (Planning) 2 hrs. 3-14-97 Dick Harlow/ 2 hrs. Herb Fauland 3-18-97 City (Circulation) 2 hrs. 3-19-97 Team Meeting 2 hrs. 3-21-97 City (Public Works) 2 hrs. 3-25-97 Dick Harlow/ 2 hrs. Herb Fauland 4-8-97 Ping. Commission 2 hrs. 4-11-97 Dick Harlow/ 3 hrs. Herb Fauland 446-97 Team Meeting 2 hrs. ' TOTAL 37 hrs. Anticipated future meetings 6 hrs. GRAND TOTAL 43 hrs. TOTAL COST: 43 hrs. as $125 - $5,375 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES Reimburseables to Date Facsimile Transmissions 7-19-96 S 1.80 12-10-96 3.60 12-10-96 3.15 12-12-96 3.60 12-12-96 3.60 12-12-96 .45 Subtotal $16.20 Delivery 1-15-97 S 14.00 Subtotal S14.00 Reproductions, Printing & Formatting 12-5-96 City of H.B. (Aerial Photos) $ 120.00 1-22-97 Kinkos 38.36 1-31-97 Banana BIue 80.78 ` 2-5-97 . Banana Blue 8.08 2-6-97 Banana Blue 8.08 2-15-97 Peter Brandow 696.48 3-15-97 Peter Brandow 314.71 Subtotal $1,266.49 TOTAL $1,296.69 x (1.1) TOTAL COST: $1.426.36 1401 Quail Sheet, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 ATTACHMENT 2 0 0 AMENDMENT NO.3 TO SPECIFIC PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND MCDONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY COMPANY THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into the ( M day of De-4 b C Y , 1997, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the City," and MCDONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY CORPORATION, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "MDRC." WHEREAS, the City and MDRC are parties to that certain agreement, dated July 1, 1996, entitled "Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report Reimbursement Agreement," as amended, which agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as "the Original Agreement," and The parties wish to further amend the Original Agreement to provide for certain changes therein, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by the City and MDRC as follows: Section 2 of the Original Agreement, entitled "Reimbursement of Consulting Costs," is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 2. Reimbursgment of Consulting Costs. City shall be entitled to reimbursement of all costs associated with the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report for the Business Park, regardless of whether the Planning Commission and City Council approve, conditionally approve, or deny the Specific Plan or Environmental Impact Report. The reimbursement shall be consistent with the project schedule budget attached hereto as Exhibit B, and shall not exceed $303,099.00, absent a change order. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Consultant's contract with the City, City shall pay all invoices of the Consultant. The City will then invoice MDRC for the amount paid to the Consultant, which amount MDRC shall pay to the City within 30 days of receipt of the invoice." Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the j4/s:PCD:Agree:Amdspcc3 RI S 97-692 911b/97 original agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their authorized officers on the date first above written. MDRC: MCDONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY COMPANY, INC. a California corporation By: Z�4 STEPHEN J. BARKER DIRECIORAI ISINESS OPERATIAWQ (print name) Its: (circle one) Chairman/President/Vice President Lin (print name) Its: (circle one) Secretary/Chief Financia Asst. Secretary -Treasurer REVIEWED -AND APPROVED: Dr 4y i Administrator F4 j4/s:PCD:Agrcc:Amdspec3 R1S 97-692 9116/97 CITY: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation ATTEST: City Clerk /b p i1q7 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ad:- Cify Attorne61q,"I INITIATED AND APPROVED: Director of Com nity Development • CERTIFIED COPY OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOL UTION 7'he undersigned,- Michael C . Dra,,in, as Secretary of McDonnell Douglas'Realry Company (the "Corporation "), hereby certiftes that the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation by unanintous written consent dated January 10, 1995, and that such resolutions have not been amended, modified or rescinded and remain in full force and effectas of the date hereof: M, OLVED, that Stephen J. Rarker, Philip W. gburt and Thomas A. Overturf be and they hereby are each authorized and empowered to execute and deliver, in the none and on behalf of the Corporation, any and all kgreements, contracts, instrwnents, records, papers and other documents and writings, with the power- to redelegate such authorization {without the power of further redeiegationj by a specific wnitten delegation of authority to any einployee assigned to a departrnenr or group which reports, directly or indirectly, to such delegating officer. Dated rhisA� ` day of , 1996 Michael C. Draffin, Secrefary FORM.131 Post -It- brand tax transmittal memo 761 s or page■ r lbw From Dept. V Pnone Fax/ .3 U/-I5ya Fax ,3ro-GZ7-.3� 05/14/97 14:02 FAX 4 a.60 1046 EDAW INC. 11oa1/o EXHIBIT B May 14, 1997 Mr. Herb Fauland City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLANIOR - BUDGET AUGMENT EDA: Landscape Architccc Planning [Urban Dcsign Environmental Anal, Site Engineering Graphic Design Dear Herb: EDAW, Inc.17875 Von Karman F Suite 400 As a follow up u1 our meeting last week and our conversation on Monday, I am Irvine, CA 92614 714 660-8044 forwarding this- budget augment request for City and MDRC approval- This FAX 714 660-1046 request serves as an update to the April 18, 1997 "Draft" request and incorporates additional services performed/to be performed by Adams Associates, WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. (WPA), and EDAW. As you are. aware, we are nearing completion of '.the Specific Plan for the McDonnell Centre Business Park. Mike Adams forwarded an augment request to you, dated April 14, 1997, to cover the costs through completion of the Final Specific Plan. I am formally transmitting this request for $12,500 under this letter. As we discussed, I have also attended bi-monthly project meetings since December of last year, as requested by Melanie Fallon. In a letter dated December 10, 1996 sent to Melanie, I indicated that a budget augment would be necessary to cover the following: 1) my attendance at a total of 12 meetings; 2) preparation of meeting agendas; 3) preparation of meeting minutes; and 4) follow-up coordination with City staff and consultants to ensure action items identified in meetings are implemented. The first project meeting was held on December 13, 1996 and to date, I have attended a total of 10 project meetings. According to the most recent project schedule, we can safely assume that the project will continue at least through to September 1997. Therefore, I am San Francisco requesting a budget augment for attendance at a total of 10 subsequent bimonthly A1exandria project meetings. The labor cost estimate for 10 additional meetings is $6,250. Arlanta Denver Fort Collins Huntsville Irvine C3slanda Sacrarnenco scaale London Glasgow Calmar Sophia Antipolis Sydney Brisbunc Gold Coast PMN11601NCOMr1%FAt ANE)1WC Melbournc Flon¢ Kona 05/14/97 14:03 FAX P".R 1046 Mr. Herb Fauland May 14, 1997 Page 2 EDAM INC. 121002/OC EDA" Additionally, the extended project schedule and coo rdination/attendance at bi-monthly project meetings has resulted in the depiction of a substantial portion of EDAW's original expense and word processing budget. As of our April 17, 1997 invoice, 74.73% and 48.94% of EDAW's expense and word processing budgets have been expended. EDAW expenses include such items as phone, fax, mileage, xarox, etc. and are billed to the client direct with no mark-up. Based upon the expected project completion date and additional meetings, EDAW requests $1,900.00 for expenses and $1,000,00 for word processing be added to our remaining budgets. Lastly, on May G, 1997, WPA submitted an add service request to their existing contract (see page 2 of their attached request). They indicated that the primary factor that was not anticipated in their existing contract/addendum was added analyses caused by the results of the HCM analyses. The addendum cited performance of the HCM analyses, which were initially completed; however, the outcome of the initial findings required a significant amount of added work. The HCM analyses were anticipated to yield less conservative results than the existing ICU analyses, which would have resulted in the scope described in the addendum. The results of the HCM for many location and conditions, -however, actually were more conservative than the ICU analyses. This caused the need to initiate an iteration process of the HCM analyses in ardor to attempt to determine if the Level of Service could he improved through changed signal timing. When this process was exhausted, then changes in the mitigation measures were required to address the HCM findings. Added changes in the analyseslrepart that resulted form the mitigation changes wore also undertaken in the completion of the final report. This added work utilized the remaining budget that was reserved for attendance at hearings and response to EIR comments and, in fact, exceeded the total by approximately $1,000. They have i requested that the $1,000 average, response to EIR comments, and hearings be addressed through an addendum. Since the amount of work related to meeting attendance and. EIR comments is speculative at this time, they maybe best addressed on a time and materials bases with some initial "not to exceed" fee. EDAW believes a $3,000 not to exceed feu should be adequate to complete the traffic response to comments and attend necessary future meetings/hearings. The above -described work efforts result in a grand total of $9,150 for EDAW, $4,000 for WPA, and $12,500 for Adams Associates. P"dN 11601NCO Ra"ALL&.''DLWC 05/14/97 14:04 F 4.P40 1040 EDAW INC. Q003/0C ... L Mr. Herb Fauland May 14, 1997 Page, 3 EDA-1 Since this augment does require Council approval,-EDAW needs to receive a letter -from the City or MDRC indicating that the costs for these acid services will be covered. If you have any questions or require additional information, please give me or Sally a call. Thank you for your assistance in processing this request. Sincerely, ayaa Morgan Senior Associate cc: Melanie Fallon Howard Zelefsky Julie 4sugi Dick Harlow Mike Adams Steve Sasaki Steve Barker Kim Strachan r P AM 16d 1 TO RM Pu'n ULANM DO C 0 April 14, 1997 MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES Mr. Herb Fauland, Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ' Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 RE: McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Dear Herb: This letter is a follow-up to our conversation on the need to augment the consulting contract, with EDAW, for the Specific Plan. As we discussed the original proposal did not budget for the number of special meetings which have been conducted. These meetings have now resulted in an -extensive list of modifications to the text, maps and graphics of the Specific Plan. I have prepared an augmentation budget to address these additional services along with an itemization of reimbursable expenses to date and included a contingency amount sufficient to cover any additional reimbursable expenses through the completion of the draft Specific Plan. I have discussed the need for this augmentation with Jayna. She suggested that in order to expedite the request, it should be directed to you for City and McDonnell Douglas review by the April 16th meeting. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me. Sincerely Mike s cc: Jayna Morgan, EDAW 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 I MICHAEL C. ADAMS" ASSOCIATES Adams Associates Proposes to provide the outlined services on a time and materials basis with fees not to exceed the following: Estimated Budget: Text & Graphics Modifications Total: $4,100 Non Budgeted Meetings Total: $5;400 Reimbursables Total: $1,500 Contingency (For additional Graphic Materials) Total: $1,500 Total Budget:$12,500 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 • -- L MICHAEL C. ADAMS" ASSOCIATES Meetings.to Date 12-12-96 MDRC 3 hrs. 1-13-97 City Staff 2 hrs. 1-22-97 Dick Harlow 1 hr. 1-22-97 Herb Fauland I hr. 2-27-97 Team. Meeting 3 hrs. 3-3-97 Dick Harlow/ 2 hrs. Herb Fauland 3-3-97 MDRC 2 hrs. 3-5-97 " " Team Meeting 2 hrs. 3-13-97 City (Landscaping) 2 hrs. 3-13-97 City (Planning) 2 hrs. 3-14-97 Dick Harlow/ 2 hrs. Herb Fauland 3-18-97 City (Circulation) 2 hrs. 3-19-97 Team Meeting 2 hrs. 3-21-97 City (Public Works) 2 hrs. 3-25-97 Dick Harlow/ 2 hrs. Herb Fauland 4-8-97 Ping. Commission 2 hrs. 4-11-97 Dick Harlow/ 3 hrs. Herb Fauland 4-16-97 Team Meeting 2 hrs. `TOTAL 37 hrs. Anticipated future meetings 6 hrs. GRAND TOTAL 43 hrs. TOTAL COST: 43 hrs. @ $125 = $5,375 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 • r- MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES Reimburseables to Date Facsimile Transmissions 7-19-96 12-10-96 12-10-96 12-12-96 12-12-96 12-12-96 Subtotal Delivery 1-15-97 Subtotal Reproductions, Printing & Formatting $ 1.80 3.60 3.15 3.60 3.60 .45 $16.20 $ 14.00 $14.00 12-5-96 City of H.B. (Aerial Photos) $ 120.00 1-22-97 . Kinkos 3 8.3 6 1-31-97 Banana Blue 80.78 ' 2-5-97 . Banana Blue 8.08 2-6-97 Banana Blue 8.08 2-15-97 Peter Brandow 696.48 3-15-97 Peter Brandow 314.71 Subtotal $1,266.49 TOTAL $1,296.69 z (1.1) TOTAL COST: $1.426.36 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 ATTACHMENT 3 i Certificate of lnsurancs Agency Name and Address: THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE INSURANCE BROKERS, INC. 10 CALIFORNIA STREET INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE REDWOOD CITY CA 94063-1513 AFFORDED THE: POLICIES LISTED BELOW. (415) 389.59M Faic (415) W&1455 Insureds Name and Address: Companies Affording Policies: EDAW INC. I40F1/5 753 DAVIS STREET #�' 600.10 A: AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS B: AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS c: SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111 600. 10 In D: AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE CO. - KSA E: CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY 1o7 F: COVERAGES: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT PdjLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD IND:CATI=D. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONOmON OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WmH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED F.ERMN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDmONS OF SUCH POLICIES. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER EFF. DATE EXP. DATE GENERAL LIABILITY © Commercial General Liability 7KO409001-00 7/1197 711198 ❑ Claims Made A Occurrence ❑ Owner's and Contractors Protective 13 AUTO LIABILITY ❑ Any Automobile 7KO409001-00 711197 7/1/98 ❑ All Owned Autos ❑ Scheduled Autos B Hired Autos J Non -awned Autos G:"- ❑ Garage Liability CTC=. EXCESS LIABILITY ��- 'a =• ` C ❑ Umbrella Form 01 Other than Umbrella Form D WORKERS' COMPENSATION 7GVV2855340Tn ` TT91N W D AND EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY E PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY' AEN8234087 3124197 3/24198 F POLICY LIMITS General Aggregate: $2,000,000 Products-Com/Ops Aggregate: $2.000.000 Personal and Adv. Injury: $1.000,000 Each Occurrence: $1,000,000 Fire Dmg. (any one fire): $500,000 Combined Single Limit: $1,000,000 Bodily Injury/person: $0 Bodily Injury/accident: $0 Property Damage: Each Occurrence: Aggregate: Statutory Limits Each Accident: $1,000,000 Disease/PolicyLimit: $1,000,000 Disease/Employee: $1,000,000 Aggregate $1.000,000 Description of Operat ions/Location s/Vehicles/Restdctjons/Special Items: All operations of the Named Insured. General Liability only: The City of Huntington Beach, its officers and employees are named as additional Insureds but only as respects liability arising out of the Named Insureds' operations in the Preparation of McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan & EIR, project # BN116.01; such coverage Is primary as respects any insurance carried by the additional Insured with respect to work performed by the Named Insured. -Written at aq-gregaie limits OT uaDnity not less Ulan amount snOWn. Certificate Holder: THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 3RD FLOOR 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 ATTN: MS. JULIE SAKAGUCHI THE AGGREGATE LIMIT IS THE TOTAL INSURANCE AVAILABLE FOR CLAIMS PRESENTED WITHIN THE POLICY FOR ALL OPERATIONS OF THE INSURED - CANCELLATION: SHOULO ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL 30 DAYS WRrTTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. Authorized Repr enla! / 8114197 MH cc: 0 AMERICAN MANUFACTURER elm 0704r Fizz_6 cao,�o Yr1c'J ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 600, r o G a PROGRAM ENDORSEMENT 7 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following BUSINESSOWNERS POLICY for: Insured: EDAW, INC. Policy: 7KQ409001-00 Effective: 7/1/97-7/1/98 A. Primary Coverage With respect to claims arising out of the operations of the Named Insured, such insurance as afforded by this policy is primary and is not additional to or contributing with any other insurance carried by or for the benefit of the Additional Insureds. B. Cross Liability Clause The naming of more than one person, firm or corporation as insureds under this policy shall not, for that reason alone, extinguish any rights of the insured against another, but this endorsemerit, and the naming of multiple insureds, shall not increase the total liability of the Company under this policy. C. Notice of Cancellation 1. If we cancel this policy for any reason other than non-payment of premium, we will mail written notice at least 30 days before the effective date of cancellation to the Additional Insureds on file with the Company. 2. If we cancel this policy for non-payment of premium, we will mail written notice at least 10 days before the effective date of cancellation to the Additional Insureds on file with the Company. ADDITIONAL INSURED The City of Huntington Beach, its officers and employees TYPE OF OPERATION Preparation of Mc Donnell Centre Buisness Park Specific Plan & EIR, Project # 6N116.01 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Augustl4,1997 0 a Council/Agency Meeting Held: !fy 7 Deferred/Continued to: Approved ❑ Cond'ti�a`Ily Approved ❑ Denied Council Meeting Date: September 2, 1997 600.10 ,04ptyt City Cle 's Signature Department ID Number: CD 97-44 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administr / PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Community Development Director ,.ram SUBJECT: Amendment No. 2 to the Contract with EDAW, In . and Amendment No. 2 to the Reimbursement Agreement with McDonnell Douglas Realty Company for Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and EIR Statement of Issue, Funding Source, Recommended Action, Alternative Action(s), Analysis, Environmental Status, Attachment(s) .. FIN1111. =31 lnej!�M Transmitted for your consideration is a request for a second amendment to the existing contract between the City of Huntington Beach and EDAW, Inc. and the reimbursement agreement between the City and McDonnell Douglas Realty Company (MDRC) for preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Staff, with the assistance of EDAW, and the agreement of McDonnell Douglas Realty Company (the applicant) have expanded the original scope of work to allow for EDAW and it's sub -consultants to take on a greater portion of the Specific Plan preparation which was originally to be completed by the applicant. Staff has worked with EDAW and the applicant in establishing an appropriate scope of work for preparation of the Specific Plan and EIR and is submitting the contract amendments, reflecting the additional work and associated costs, for City Council approval. The amendment to the contract is for additional services in an amount not to exceed $38,975 which when added to the previously amended total contract cost of $238,474, brings the total contract amount to $277,449. Consulting costs are to be borne by MDRC through approval of the amendment to the reimbursement agreement. Therefore, there will be no effect on the City's budget. L la R16UEST FOR COUNCIL ACTS MEETING DATE: September 2, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 97-44 Motion to: 1. "Approve Amendment No. 2 to the professional services agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and EDAW, Inc. for additional services in the amount of $38,975 to prepare the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report, for a total contract fee not to exceed $277,449. 2. "Approve Amendment No. 2 to the reimbursement agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and McDonnell Douglas Realty Company for additional consulting services in the amount of $38,975 to prepare the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report, for a total agreement fee not to exceed $277,449." The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. Deny the request and direct staff accordingly. The McDonnell Douglas Realty Company (MDRC) submitted an application for approval of a specific plan and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the McDonnell Centre Business Park. The proposed specific plan area consists of the entire 307 acre area bounded by Rancho Road and the US Navy railroad right of way on the north, Springdale Street on the east, Bolsa Avenue on the south, and Bolsa Chica Street on the west. The objectives of the specific plan are (1) to prevent further piecemeal development of the area; (2) allow for development of a mix of industrial, commercial/retail, and office uses that is compatible with the existing area; (3) create a distinguishable character for the McDonnell Centre Business Park area through the creation and implementation of design guidelines; and (4) facilitate future development of the specific plan area by allowing subsequent projects, that are consistent with the specific plan, to be processed without additional entitlement. On July 1, 1997, the City Council approved the contract between the City and EDAW, Inc., and the reimbursement agreement between the City and MDRC for preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and EIR. The original contract and reimbursement agreement covered environmental consulting services, review of a draft specific plan (to be provided by McDonnell Douglas Realty Company), and preparation of design guidelines for the specific plan area. CD97-44.DOC -2- 08/25/97 8:59 AM R16UEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIA MEETING DATE: September 2, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 97-44 On April 7, 1997, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to the EDAW contract and MDRC reimbursement agreement to cover MDRC's request that preparation of the draft specific plan be included in the Professional Services contract with EDAW, Inc. and to cover additional monthly McDonnell Douglas Specific Plan meetings to assure that City staff and MDRC processing decisions are consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act and state provisions regarding the preparation of specific plans. These meetings were not considered in the original scope of work. Development of the McDonnell Business Park Specific Plan and EIR has been a long complicated process which has requires more revisions, supplemental analysis, and staff/project coordination meetings than originally anticipated. Since the last augment, EDAW and its subconsultants have completed the draft EIR and Specific Plan. Completion of these documents required additional unanticipated revisions, supplemental traffic analyses and staff coordination meetings. In addition, EDAW has prepared graphics and presentation displays which were not anticipated in the original contract. EDAW, under the guidance of staff, has prepared a supplemental scope of work to address these items. A breakdown of the additional services and associated costs is provided as Exhibit A of the amendments to the service agreements (Attachments No. 1 and 2). EDAW's project manager and sub -consultant team have an understanding of the City's issues and are responsive to staffs concerns. They have consistently provided a quality product on schedule and work well as an extension of staff. Staff has worked with EDAW in establishing the revised scope of work and recommends that the City Council approve the contract amendment reflecting the additional work and associated cost in the amount of $38,975, as well as the amendment to the reimbursement agreement with MDRC to cover the additional costs. The selection of a consultant to prepare planning documents does not constitute a project under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and therefore is not subject to CEQA. However, the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan will be subject to CEQA and will require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The EIR is in the process of being prepared in conjunction with the specific plan and will comply with the provisions of CEQA. CD97-44.DOC -3- 08/25/97 8:59 AM RAUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIN MEETING DATE: September 2, 1997 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD 97-44 Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and EDAW, Inc. for Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and EIR. 2• Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and EDAW, Inc. for Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and EIR. 3. Insurance Certificates - CD97.44.DOC -4- 08/25/97 8:59 AM (7) 09/02/97 - Counciltncy Agenda - Page 7 E-10. (City Council) Transfer Of Deeds -Future Linear Park Prooertv Located Along Bolsa Chica Bluff - To County Of Orange - slw Garfield Avenue - Seapoint Street and w/o Edwards Street/Ellis Avenue - Approve the transfers by deed of Parcel No. 2 - APN 110-015-76 located on the southwest corner of Garfield Avenue and Seapoint Street and Parcel No. 3 - APN 110-015-78 located west of Edwards Street at Ellis Avenue, from the City of Huntington Beach to the County of Orange, authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the deeds and record with the County Recorder. _Submitted by the Deputy City Administrator -Administrative Services [Approved 6-0-1 (Green: Absent)] E-11. (City Council) Downtown Hardscape Sidewalk High Pressure Water Cleanin (320.45) - Approve appropriation of $4,195.00 from the unencumbered general fund balance to account No. E-AA-PW-541-3-90-00, contractual services to clean and seal certain downtown hardscape area. Submitted by the Public Works Director [Approved 4-2-1 (Sullivan & Garofalo: NO; Green: Absent)] E-12. Amendment No. 2 To The Contract With EDAW Inc. And Amendment No. 2 To The Reimbursement Agreement With McDonnell Douglas Realty Company For Preparation Of The McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan And Environmental Impact Report (600.10) - 1. Approve Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and EDAW, Inc., for Planning Consulting Services for the Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report. (Additional Services $38,975 - total agreement fee not to exceed $277,449); and 2. Approve Amendment No. 2 to Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and McDonnell Douglas Realty Company. (Additional consulting services in the amount of $38,975 - total agreement fee not to exceed $277,449) Submitted by the Community Development Director ['Approved 6-0-1 (Green: Absent)] (7) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK CALIFORNIA 92648 CITY CLERK LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL REGARDING ITEM( APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMEtiT AGENCY APPROVED ITEM TO: LO A- W. r/VC Name Street liv„vim . City, State, zip See Attached Action Agenda Item 'E-1Z ATTENTION: DEPARTMENT: Se lo& REGARDING: /)) �202nez� 1i9X& C, Date of Approval q/,;g A77- ___ Enclosed For Your Records Is An Executed Copy Of The Above Referenced Item For Your Records. �7� & 4,UT Connie Brockwav City Clerk Attachments: Action Agenda Page � Agreement ✓ Bonds Insurance RCA Deed Other Remarks: ,4C' Ti U�+% CC: 1A�LJ/1r �L� ✓ ��.�d Name Department RC: �ereem^ t Irsuran z O her Name D.rar'ment RCA Areer nem Insurance 01!1er Kam t Risk Management Department Insurance Cope / RCA Agreement Insurance Other i;;Fo;:oul:p aggr :s transhr { Tel ephona: 714.536.5227 ) AMENDMENT NO.2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND EDAW, INC. FOR PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT THIS AMENDMENT No. 2 is made and entered into the day of 1997, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the City," and EDAW, INC., a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor." WHEREAS, the City and Contractor are parties to that certain agreement, dated July 1, 1996, entitled "PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND EDAW, INC. FOR PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT," as amended, which agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as "the Original Agreement," and The parties wish to further amend the Original Agreement to provide for certain changes therein, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by the City and Contractor as follows: Section 1 of the Original Agreement, entitled "Work Statement," is hereby amended to read as follows: "CONTRACTOR shall provide all services as described in the Scope of Work proposals as Tasks, one (1.0) through four (4.0) including optional tasks, dated April 25, 1996, and all tasks identified in the letter from Jayna Morgan to Herb Fauland dated January 8, 1997, and all.tasks identified in the letter from Jayna Morgan to Herb Fauland dated July 28, 1997, hereinafter collectively referred to as Exhibit "A" which Exhibit "A" is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. Said services shall sometimes be referred to as "PROJECT." "CONTRACTOR hereby designates Jayna Morgan, who shall represent it and be its sole agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement." G:4:97agree:amdedaw2 RLS 97-647 8/ 19/97 _(� Section 4 of the Original Agreement, entitled "Compensation," is hereby amended to read as follows: "In consideration of the performance of the consulting services described in Section l above, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR a fee not to exceed Two Hundred Seventy-seven Thousand Four Hundred Forty-nine Dollars ($277,444.00) based upon the fees as stated in Exhibit A,_" r r • Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the original agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their authorized officers on the date first above written. CONTRACTOR: EDAW, INC. a California corporation By: 1 i (print name) Its: (circle one) Chairtnan/Preside Vice i'resident By. (print name) [is: (circle one) Secretary/Chief Financial Officer/ Asst. Secretary -Treasurer REVIEWED AND APPROVED: *ityvAdministrator 2 Q4-_97asree:aMdedaa2 RI-9 97-647 8119/97 CITY: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation ATTEST: IA= _,, - City CIerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: C' y 11torney �s_5,- INI ED AND.APPROVED: of Co6Tfnunity Deve • • EXHIBIT A July 28, 1997 Mr. Herb Fauland City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 EDAW ju 29 IV gEPARTN4ENT OFF CO%9:1uNITY GE LOP,Jl�N7 RE: MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLANiEIR - BUDGET AUGMENT Dear Herb: As a follow up to our meeting and our conversation on Wednesday, July 2, 1997, I am forwarding this final budget augment request for City and MDRC approval. This request represents additional services performed/to be performed by Adams Associates, WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. (WPA), and EDAW. As you are aware, we are nearing completion of the Specific Plan for the McDonnell Centre Business Park. Mike Adams forwarded augment requests to EDAW, dated June 24, 1997 and July 23, 1997, to cover the costs through completion and adoption of the Final Specific Plan. I am formally transmitting this Mike Adams request for $15,000.00 under this letter. This augment covers text and graphics modifications and presentation displays, past and future non -budgeted meetings, and additional revisions and rewrites (see Attachment A). EDAW has also incurred labor expenses related to the Specific Plan for which we are requesting additional funds. EDAW staff also assisted in incorporating revisions to the Specific Plan and revised the Appendices to the Specific Plan (Consistency with the General Plan i.e. Specific Plan Section numbers changed and thus the references to these numbers were verified and revised as necessary), based on the final changes made within the Specific Plan. EDAW is requesting $2,000.00 for this' effort, which includes $900.00 for future changes to be made in the Specific Plan Appendices, which could occur through the public hearing process. Secondly, on July 14, 1997, WPA submitted an add service request to their, existing contract in the amount of $9,044.00. Since the time of our budget augment letter submitted to you on May 14, 1997 (which included a budget augment request from WPA), WPA has indicated that they have provided a significant amount of additional work as requested. by EDAW and/or the City of Huntington Beach. These additional work efforts total $9,044.00 and are provided in. detail in WPA's July 14, 1997 letter (see Attachment B). Additionally, WPA still needs to accomplish tasks such as response to comments received on the draft EIR (including a signal warrant analysis at Rancho Road and Suffolk), and attendance at team meetings and public hearings. Thirdly, as we have discussed, EDAW has performed tasks related to this project, neither covered by our original contract, nor by our subsequent budget augments. Per our conversations, EDAW is preparing the staff reports and resolutions for both Planning Commission and City P:199616N 116011Coresp\Augment3 Council hearings. This task was not covered under our original contract. EDAW will complete the draft staff report and resolutions for the Planning Commission hearing and will submit this' draft on disk to the City of Huntington Beach, so that the City is able to make any necessary revisions prior to the Planning Commission hearing. After the Planning Commission hearing, EDAW will make any revisions as necessary to use as the base for creating the City Council staff report. EDAW will also complete the draft staff report and resolutions for the City Council hearing and will also submit this draft on disk to the City for revisions prior to the hearing. After the City Council hearing, EDAW will make any revisions as necessary. EDAW has also attended additional meetings with City staff beyond the original three (3), which were budgeted for in our June 1996 contract. These staff meetings differ from the "bi-monthly" meetings identified in our previous budget augments. In the last two months, EDAW attended two (2) meetings to discuss traffic findings with the City of Westminster, one (1) meeting to discuss and outline staff report and other hearing deadlines for the project, and two (2) "Red Team" meetings on 6/24/97 to discuss the permit process and potential environmental issues for the EELV. The initial EELV meeting attended by EDAW on April 29`h and the EDAW proposal response time was allocated to a separate EDAW proposal and is not part of this add service request. The total cost for completion of the staff reports and resolutions and attendance at additional staff meetings (5 total), is $10,500.00. As we discussed during our interview for this project, EDAW would be able to prepare the staff reports and resolutions within the original labor contingency budget of $12,594.00. However, this labor contingency budget was subsequently reduced by $6,525.00 to cover the WPA augment, dated July 26, 1996. The remaining labor contingency budget of $6,069.00 will be used for EDAW to accomplish this staff report/resolutions task; however, EDAW would require an additional $4,431.00. Additionally, the extended project schedule, coordination of the bi-monthly meetings and preparation of large scale presentation graphics has resulted in the depletion of a substantial portion of EDAW's original expense and word processing budget. EDAW has incurred several additional expenses that also were not covered under our original contract. These expenses were related to printing of the large scale Specific Plan boards (9 total), printing of review drafts of the Specific Plan, faxing bi-monthly meeting agendas and minutes to the project team, and the fact that the original EIR printing budget was exceeded due to the length of and inclusion of the oversized graphics included in the technical appendices. Based upon these additional tasks, we request an additional $3,000.00 to cover expenses and word processing costs through project completion. Lastly, EDAW has printed and submitted additional copies of the EIR Volumes I -and II 'and Specific Plan Volumes I and II for MDRC, Hewitt -McGuire, and Hunsaker & Associates. These additional copies resulted in costs of $500.00. EDAW is also requesting a contingency budget in the amount of $5,000.00 for preparing responses and EIR revisions to potential comments on the EELV that may be submitted during the 45-day public review period ending on August 7, 1997. EDAW has spent staff time and coordination outside of our original scope of work in trying to determine how the EELV could be P;199616N 116011CoresplAugmenO incorporated into the Specific Plan and addressed within the EIR and to date this time has been charged to an EDAW proposal number; however, since the draft EIR added discussions regarding the EELV in the project description, there is a potential that we could receive some comments requesting further analysis and clarification. Since the EELV was not assumed to be part of the project description when EDAW prepared our scope of work, responding to such comments are outside our scope of work. We believe the contingency budget could adequately cover additional response efforts and will only be utilized if EELV comments are received. The above -described work efforts result in a grand total budget augment request (including the 5,000 contingency budget) is $38,975.00 plus the remaining contingency funds of $6,069.00. WPA has provided a proposal to address access issues related to the EELV (refer to Attachment A). If it is determined at a later date that we will need to revise the EIR document to reflect implementation of the EELV, EDAW will submit a subsequent add service for WPA's effort. Sincerely, Jayna organ Senior Associate cc: Melanie Fallon Howard Zelefsl Julie Sakaguchi Dick Harlow Mike Adams Steve Sasaki Steve Barker Kim Strachan 7I P:199616N 116011Coresp�AugmenO W* : 0 0 R P % '. # % P �.. -.� ` n &b g �WPA Traffic En ineenh Inc. 1997 0 A -A t EDAW, ��� 15 INC, IRVINi s TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER l July 14, 1997 Ms. Jayna Morgan EDAW, Inc. 17875 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 400 Irvine, CA 92614 Dear Ms. Morgan: Please find this request for an addendum to our present "not to exceed" budget, which is described in your letter to the City of Huntington Beach, dated May 14, 1997. Since the time of the budget augment (an added $3,000.00), we have provided a significant amount of work as requested by you and/or the City of Huntington Beach. These efforts have included: 4• Attendance at six (6) meetings, including one prior to meeting with Westminster Staff, meeting with Westminster Staff, attendance at team meetings, and public comment input. -r �+ Reviewed plans and field checked comments raised by City of Westminster Staff. 4- WPA Staff visited the Westminster / Rancho intersection and prepared a detailed cost estimate for potential improvement. "Fair share" percentages were also examined as a part of this process. �• Provided input on the description of the traffic impacts / mitigations for the EIR. �;• Responded to questions raised as the draft documents were prepared. 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 • Laguna Mills, CA 92653 • (714) 460-0110 • FAX: 1714) 460-0113 s The work effort expended in order to complete these tasks presently totals $5,244.00, which exceeds the present budget of $3,000.-00. Some of the items which still need to be addressed are: �* Response to comments received on the DEIR from citizens, the City of Westminster, other agencies, etc. I. Attendance at some team meetings, prior to the public hearings. Although it is not possible to know the actual scope of work that would be required, since the public comment period is still active, we are providing an estimate of the added scope of services. This could change, if comments are received which require added analyses, added meetings are attended, etc. O Field Check / Count and Analyses (Based on Citizen Comments) O Response to Comments (12 Hours) O Team Meetings (3 @ 4 Hours) O Hearings (4 @ 7 Hours) O Miscellaneous (8 Hours) Subtotal PROPOSED "NOT TO EXCEED" ADDENDUM Cl Previously Completed Work Call $ 500.00 - $1,140.00 $1,140.00 $2,660.00 -s- 2a00 $6,200.00 $6,820.00 $6,800.00 . $2,244^00 0 4 4 -2- I WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. Request for a Contrad Addendum Job 4950403 McDonnell Centre Project - Huntington Beach -3- In addition, we were requested to provide a proposal for work related to incorporating the EELV project in the EIR. Based on our current understanding of the work -effort required, a fee of $8,150.00 is proposed. Please find that proposal attached to this letter. We appreciate the opportunity to continue working with you on this great project. Please Iet us know if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully submitted, "A TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC Steven S. Sasaki, P.E. (CL0-) Senior Engineer SSS:cc APPROVED BY: TITLE: DATE: WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc Request for a ContradAddendum Job MOM McDonnell CentreProjed -Huntington Beach w*p • • � r6� A WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. N TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING July 14, 1997 Ms. Jayna Morgan EDAW, Inc. 17875 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 400 Irvine, CA 92614 Dear Ms. Morgan: R This letter has been prepared in response to your request for added work related to the proposed expansion of the McDonnell Douglas operations, known as the EELV project. It is our understanding that the primary work effort would involve the examination of the access and on -site circulation related to the proposed facility, as well as addressing the movement of oversized trucks from the site to a specified delivery location. It is assumed, as a part of this proposal, that the project would fall within the "interim" trip budget presently established. There may need to be some justification of this assumption through some trip generation analyses; however, it is assumed that no added or changed off -site analyses are required at this time. This budget is a preliminary estimate, which may be modified based on a more specific scope of work and/or input from City Staff. This should provide a reasonable estimate of the work that may be required in order to include this project as a part of the current EIR. We are pleased to have the opportunity to provide a fee estimate for the added work. A fee of $8,150.00 is proposed for the work related to the EEL project. Our schedule for the new work is anticipated to require approximately three (3) to four (4) weeks to complete. N 23421 South Pointe Drive + Suite 190 0 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 • (714) 460.0110 0 FAX: (714) 460-0113 -2- This letter can serve as a memorandum of agreement and our authorization to proceed. Please sign one copy and return it to us for our files. We are looking forward to serving you on this most interesting project. Respectfully submitted, WPA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC Steven S. Sasaki, P.E. �eLc� Senior Engineer SSS:cc CONTRACT APPR APPROVED BY: TITLE: DATE: WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. PROPOSAL forAdded Work Mating to EELVProject Job #9Sa403 McDonnell Centre Projed - Huntington Beach • :7 M912 5 Meetings - 3 @ 4 Hours Each $1,250.00 Access and On -Site Circulation $2,900.00 Trip Generation Comparison $1,200.00 Route Analvses $2.800.00 4 WPA Traff u Engineering, Inc. PROPOSAL foiAdded Work Relating to EEL VProjed Job #950403 McDonnell Centre Project - Huntington Beach �� A Traffic WPA Trac Engineering, Inc. TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Effective January 1, 1995 MFESSIONAL SIAFF Firm Principal Senior Engineer Associate Engineer Assistant Engineer PPORT STAF $110.00 $ 95.00 $ 70.00 $ 65.00 Engineering Draftsperson $ 65.00 Draftsperson $ 45.00 Secretary $ 25.00 Clerical, Field Enumerator $ 30.00 0"M:7� r 1) Hourly rates apply to travel in addition to work time. 2) Invoices shall be submitted monthly for work in progress or upon completion of the work, at our option, and payable within 30 days after submission. After 60 days, unpaid invoices shall have a 1.5 percent, per month, service charge added. We shall have the option of halting work on your project when invoices are unpaid and overdue, unless mutual agreement is achieved. In the event that it is necessary for either party to incur legal expenses in connection with the performance of this contract, the prevailing party agrees to pay all court costs and attorney fees. 3) Compensation for services performed wih be contingent upon the necessity of the client to receive payment from other parties. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association and judgement upon the award rendered by the arbitration may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 4) These rates are based upon procedures and methods outlined in the American Society of Civil Engineer's, Manual on Engineering Practice, Number 45. 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 0 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 • (714) 460-0110 • FAX: (714) 460.0113 MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES June 24, 1997 Ms. Jayna Morgan, Senior Associate EDAW, Inc. _. 17875 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 400 Irvine, CA. 92714 Re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Dear Jayna: This letter is a follow-up to our conversation on the need to augment the Specific Plar. consulting contract. As we discussed, the original proposal did not anticipate the comments to trigger all the special meetings and rewrites which have been conducted. This extensive list of modifications to the text, maps and graphics of the Specific Plan has now been completed. I I am requesting wi augmentation amount to address these additional scrviccs rcquircd fair completion of the draft Specific Plan. If you have any questions or require additional information, plcasc contact me. Sincerely, i Mike Adams I j 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES Adams Associates proposes to provide the outlined services oa a time and materials basis with fees not to exceed the following: Estimated Budgct; Text & Graphics Modifications and Presentation Displays Total: S2,000 Non Budgeted Meetings (6 - 2/hr. meetings = 12 hrc, @ S 125 Total: S1,500 A.dditinnal Revisions and Rewrites (40 hrs. @. S 125) Total: $5,000 Total Budget:S8}500 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100. Newport peach, CA. 92660.2725 E 1) MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES July 23, 1997 Ms. Jayna Morgan, Senior Associate EDAW, Inc. 17875 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 400 f Irvine, CA. 92714 PT McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Dear Jayna: This letter is a follow-up to our conversation on the need to augment the Specific Plan consulting contract in anticipation of the Planning Commission and City Council meetings and any subsequent changes to the document. The original proposal did not anticipate the need for all the special meetings and rewrites which may occur as a result of the City review process. Any modifications to the text, maps and graphics of the Specific Plan will need to be completed concurrent with or subsequent to the Public Hearing process. I have prepared an augmentation budget to address these additional services which may be required for completion of the Specific Plan. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me. Sincerely Mike I 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA, 92660-2725 9 MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES Adams Associates proposes to provide the outlined services on a time and materials basis with fees not to exceed the following: Estimated Budget: t Text & Graphics Modifications and Presentation Displays Total $2,000.00 Additional Meetings (8 - 2/hr. meetings = 16 hrs. @ $125) Total: $2,000.00 Revisions and Rewrites (20 hrs. @ $125) Total $2,500.00 Total Budget: $6,500.00 1 401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA.� 92660-2725 • • T.TACHMENT 2.- AMENDMENT NO.2 TO SPECIFIC PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND MCDONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY COMPANY THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into theoUb day of SEEMMAFK, 1997, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the City," and MCDONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY CORPORATION, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "MDRC." WHEREAS, the City and MDRC are parties to that certain agreement, dated July 1, 1996, entitled "Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report Reimbursement Agreement," as amended, which agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as "the Original Agreement," and therein, The parties wish to furhter amend the Original Agreement to provide for certain changes NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by the City and MDRC as follows: Section 2 of the Original Agreement, entitled "Reimbursement of Consulting Costs," is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 2. Reimbursement Qf Consulting Costs. City shall be entitled to reimbursement of all costs associated with the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report for the Business Park, regardless of whether the Planning Commission and City Council approve, conditionally approve, or deny the Specific Plan or Environmental Impact Report. The reimbursement shall be consistent with the project schedule budget attached hereto as Exhibit A, and shall not exceed $277,449.00, absent a change order. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Consultant's contract with the City, City shall pay all invoices of the Consultant. The City will then invoice MDRC for the amount paid to the Consultant, which amount MDRC shall pay to the City within 30 days of receipt of the invoice." N111111KIRENINUIVAS ME Oa 61 Except as specifically modified herein. all other terms and conditions of the J41s:PCD:AJree:Amdspec2 RLS 97-647 8/l9/97 original agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their authorized officers on the date first above written. MDRC: MCDONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY COMPANY, INC. a California corporation (print name) Its: (circle one) Chairman/President-'Vice President (print name) Its: (circle one) Secretary/Chief Financial Officer/ Asst. Secretary -Treasurer REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ity Administrator 2 J 4.1s: PM Agree: Amdspec2 RLS 97-647 8119197 CITY: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation P�J.� L- Z ATTEST: 4vt4i� .. City Clerk go23/J7 APPROVE AS TO FORM: CityAtforney �,SZ- s1,,R �q-7 I INITIATED AND APPROVED. of itomnl?nity Development CERTIFIED COPY OF B OARD OF DIRECTORS RESOL UTION The undersigned, Michael C. Draffin, as Secretary+ of McDonnell Douglas'Realty Company (the "Corporation "), hereby certifies that the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation by unanimous written consent dated January 10, I995, and that such resolutions have not been amended, modified or rescinded and rentain in full force and effect as of the date hereof.• RESOLVED, that Stephen J. Barker, Philip W. Cj Burt and Thomas A. Overturf be and they hereby are each authorized and empowered to execute and deliver, in the name and on behalf of the Corporation, any and all kgreements, contracts, instruments, records, papers and other documents and writings, with the power- to redelegate such authorization (without the power of further redelegation) by a speck written delegation of authority to any employee asrigtted to a department or group which reports, directly or indirectly, to such delegating officer. _, ?"- Dated rhisa, `" day of Michael C. Drafin, Secr ary FORM.13l Post -Et- brand fax transmittal memo 7671 0 or psoe■ r / O. +..� N C41. • - r PhOnM V 0 -t ;IL 10. Dept. Fear 1'(w-'3 IF" �.]ID'&Z7-,3! EXHIBIT A EDAW July 28, 1997 CE� Mr. Herb Faulatid M 2 4 City of Huntington Beach OEPAR ����'T O�: 2000 Main Street CO�,�q,,UNITY OFvLOP'.,tNT Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN/EIR - BUDGET AUGMENT Dear Herb: As a follow up to our meeting and our conversation on Wednesday, July 2, 1997, I am forwarding this final budget augment request for City and MDRC approval. This request represents additional services performed/to be performed by Adams Associates, WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. (WPA), and EDAW. As you are aware, we are nearing completion of the Specific PIan for the McDonnell Centre Business Park. Mike Adams forwarded augment requests to EDAW, dated. June. 24, 1997 and July 23, 1997, to cover the costs through completion and adoption of the Final Specific Plan. I am formally transmitting this Mike Adams request for $15,000.00 under this letter. This augment covers text and graphics modifications and presentation displays, past and future non -budgeted meetings, and additional revisions and rewrites (see Attachment A). EDAW has also incurred labor expenses related to the Specific Plan for which we are requesting additional funds. EDAW staff also assisted in incorporating revisions to the Specific Plan and revised the Appendices to the Specific Plan (Consistency with the General Plan i.e. Specific Plan Section numbers changed and thus the references to these numbers were verified and revised as necessary), based'on the final changes made within the Specific Plan. EDAW is requesting $2,000.00 for this effort, which includes $900.00 for future changes to be made in the Specific Plan Appendices, which could occur through the public hearing process. Secondly, on July 14, 1997, WPA submitted an add service request to their. existing contract in the amount of $9,044.00. Since the time of our budget augment letter submitted to you on May 14, 1997 (which included a budget augment request from WPA), WPA has indicated that they have provided a significant amount of additional work as requested by EDAW and/or the City of Huntington Beach. These additional work efforts total $9,044.00 and are provided in detail in WPA's July 14, 1997 letter (see Attachment B). Additionally, WPA still needs to accomplish tasks such as response to comments received on the draft EIR (including a signal warrant analysis at Rancho Road and Suffolk), and attendance at team meetings and public hearings. Thirdly, as we have discussed, EDAW has performed tasks related to this project, neither covered by our original contract, nor by our subsequent budget augments. Per our conversations, EDAW is preparing the staff reports and resolutions for both Planning Commission and City P:199616Nt16011Coresp\Attgment3 p 4`%'f�' _ Council hearings. This task was not covered under our original contract. EDAW will complete the draft staff report and resolutions for the Planning Commission hearing and will submit this draft on disk to the City of Huntington Beach, so that the City is able to make any necessary revisions prior to the Planning Commission hearing. After the Planning Commission hearing, EDAW will make any revisions as necessary to use as the base for creating the City Council staff report. EDAW will also complete the draft staff report and resolutions for the City Council hearing and will also submit this draft on disk to the City for revisions prior to the hearing. After the City Council hearing, EDAW will make any revisions as necessary. EDAW has also attended additional meetings with City staff beyond the original three (3), which were budgeted for in our June 1996 contract. These staff meetings differ from the "bi-monthly" meetings identified in our previous budget augments. In the last two months, EDAW attended two (2) meetings to discuss traffic findings with the City of Westminster, one (1) meeting to discuss and outline staff report and other hearing deadlines for the project, and two (2) "Red Team" meetings on 6/24/97 to discuss the permit process and potential environmental issues for the EELV. The initial EELV meeting attended by EDAW on April 29' and the EDAW proposal response time was allocated to a separate EDAW proposal and is not part of this add service roquest. The total cost for completion of the staff reports and resolutions and attendance at additional staff meetings (5 total), is $10,500.00. As we discussed during our interview for this project,.EDAW would be able to prepare the staff reports and resolutions within the original.labor contingency budget of $12,594.00. However, this labor contingency budget was subsequently reduced by $6,525.00 to cover the WPA augment, dated July 26, 1996. The remaining labor contingency budget of $6,069.00 will be used for EDAW to accomplish this staff report/resolutions task; however, EDAW would require an additional $4,431.00. Additionally, the extended project schedule, coordination of the bi-monthly meetings and preparation of large scale presentation graphics has resulted in the depletion of a substantial portion of EDAW's original expense and word processing budget. EDAW has incurred several additional expenses that also were not covered under our original contract. These expenses were related to printing of the large scale Specific Plan boards (9 total), printing of review drafts of the Specific Plan, faxing bi-monthly meeting agendas and minutes to the project team, and the fact that the original EIR printing budget was exceeded due to the length of and inclusion of the oversized graphics included in the technical appendices. Based upon these additional tasks, we request an additional $3,000.00 to cover expenses and word processing costs through project completion. Lastly, EDAW has printed and submitted additional copies of the EIR Volumes I ,and IFand Specific Plan Volumes I and II for MDRC, Hewitt -McGuire, and Hunsaker & Associates. These additional copies resulted in costs of $500.00. EDAW is also requesting a contingency budget in the amount of $5,000.00 for preparing responses and EIR revisions to potential comments on the EELV that may be submitted during the 45-day public review period ending on August 7, 1997. EDAW has spent staff time and coordination outside of our original scope of work in trying to determine how the EELV could be P;199616N 116011Coresp\Augment3 incorporated into the Specific Plan and addressed within the EIR and to date this time has been charged to an EDAW proposal number; however, since the draft EIR added discussions regarding the EELV in the project description, there is a potential that we could receive some comments requesting further analysis and clarification. Since the EELV was not assumed to be part of the project description when EDAW prepared our scope of work, responding to such comments are outside our scope of work. We believe the contingency budget could adequately cover additional response efforts and will only be utilized if EELV comments are received. The above -described work efforts result in a grand total budget augment request (including the 5,000 contingency budget) is $38,975.00 plus the remaining contingency funds of $6,069.00. WPA has provided a proposal to address access issues related to the EELV (refer to Attachment A). If it is determined at a later date that we will need to revise the EIR document to reflect implementation of the EELV, EDAW will submit a subsequent add service for WPA's effort. Sincerely, Jayna organ Senior Associate cc: Melanie Fallon Howard Zelefsky Julie Sakaguchi Dick Harlow Mike Adams Steve Sasaki Steve Barker Kim Strachan _7< to P;199616N 11601Toresp\Augmend 0 WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc, JuL x 51997 Eoaw NC, ftltvi= r TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION July 14, 1997 Ms. Jayna Morgan EDAW, Inc. 17875 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 400 Irvine, CA 92614 Dear Ms. Morgan: 'A Please find this request for an addendum to our present "not to exceed' budget, which is described in your letter to the City of Huntington Beach, dated May 14, 1997. Since the time of the budget augment (an added $3,000.00), we have provided a significant amount of work as requested by you and/or the City of Huntington Beach. These efforts have included: 41 Attendance at six (6) meetings, including one prior to meeting with Westminster Staff, meeting with Westminster Staff, attendance at team meetings, and public comment input. w Reviewed plans and field checked comments raised by City of Westminster Staff. 4- WPA Staff visited the Westminster / Rancho intersection and prepared a detailed cost estimate for potential improvement. "Fair share" percentages were also examined as a part of this process. 4* Provided input on the description of the traffic impacts / mitigations for the EIR. 4• Responded to questions raised as the draft documents were prepared. N 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 0 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 * (714) 460.0110 9 FAX: t7141 460-0123 • • -2- 9 The work effort expended in order to complete these tasks presently totals $5,244.00, which exceeds the present budget of $3,000:00. Some of the items which still need to be addressed are:. Response to comments received on the DEIR from citizens, the City of Westminster, other agencies, etc. $• Attendance at some team meetings, prior to the public hearings. Although it is not possible to know the actual scope of work that would be required, since the public comment period is still active, we are providing an estimate of the added scope of services. This could change, if corrtments are received which require added analyses, added meetings are attended, etc. d Field Check / Count and Analyses (Based on Citizen Comments) $ 500.00 0 Response to Comments (12 Hours) $1,140.00 Q Team Meetings (3 @ 4 Hours) $1,140.00 p Hearings (4 @ 7 Hours) $2,660.00 Miscellaneous (8 Hours) 260.00 Subtotal $6,200.00 $6,820.00 PROPOSED "NOT TO EXCEED" ADDENDUM Call $60800.00 _ p Previously Completed Work $2,244,QQ TornL $9.044.00 WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc Request for a ContractAddendum Job 0950403 McDonnell Centre Project - Huntington Beach -3- In addition, we were requested to provide a proposal for work related to incorporating the F.ELV project in the EIR. • Based on our current understanding of the work -effort required, a fee of $8,150.00 is proposed. Please find that proposal attached to this letter. We appreciate the opportunity to continue working with you on this great project. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully submitted, WPA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC Steven S. Sasaki, P.E. �CLC) Senior Engineer SSS:cc eI APPROVED BY: TITLE: DATE: WPA Trirffw Engineering, Inc. I Requestfor a ContractAddendum Job #950403 McDonnell Centre Project - Huntington Beach o �n ° ` �-A WPA Traffic En ineenng, Inc . N TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING July 14, 1997 Ms. Jayna Morgan EDAW, Inc. 17875 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 400 Irvine, CA 92614 Dear Ms. Morgan: This letter has been prepared in response to your request for added work related to the proposed expansion of the McDonnell Douglas operations, known as the EEL project. It is our understanding that the primary work effort would involve the examination of the access and on -site circulation related to the proposed facility, as well as addressing the movement of oversized trucks from the site to a specified delivery location. It is assumed, as a part of this proposal, that the project would fall within the "interim" trip budget presently established. There may need to be some justification of this assumption through some trip generation analyses; however, it is assumed that no added or changed off -site analyses are required at this time. This budget is a preliminary estimate, which may be modified based on a more specific scope of work and/or input from City Staff. This should provide a reasonable estimate of the work that may be required in order to include this project as a part of the current EIR- We are pleased to have the opportunity to provide a fee estimate for the added work. A fee of $8,150.00 is proposed for the work related to the EEL project. Our schedule for the new work is anticipated to require approximately three (3) to four (4) weeks to complete. 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 0 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 * (714) 460-0110 • FAX: (714) 460.0113 • • -2- This letter can serve as a memorandum of agreement and our authorization to proceed. Please sign one copy and return it to us for our files. We are looking forward to serving you on this most interesting project. . Respectfully submitted, "A TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC Steven S. Sasaki, P.E. Senior Engineer SSS:cc APPROVED BY: TITLE: DATE: WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. PROPOSAL forAdded Work Relating to EEL VProject Job #950403 McDonnell Centre Project - Huntington Beach • • —3— -<....:..;:.. "W..:ORIC...::::ELYI'RDJEGT:: }' ... ::,....... ' <. }....:. .. Meetings - 3 @ 4 Hours Each $1,250.00 Access and On -Site Circulation $2,900.00 Trip Generation Comparison $1,200.00 Route Analyses $2,800.00 51I.00: a WPA Traffic Engineering, Ina PROPOSAL forAdded Work Relating to EEL VProjed Job #950403 McDomneU Centre Project - Huntington Beach P ft WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. 014-JA TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING f_1 Effective January I, 1995 MEES$IONAL STAFF Firm Principal Senior Engineer Associate Engineer Assistant Engineer T STA $110.00 $ 95.00 $ 70.00 $ 65.00 Engineering Draftsperson $ 65.00 Draftsperson $ 45.00 Secretary $ 25.00 Clerical, Field Enumerator $ 30.00 1) Hourly rates apply to travel in addition to work time. 2) Invoices shall be submitted monthly for work in progress or upon completion of the work, at our option, and payable within 30 days after submission. After 60 days, unpaid invoices shall have a 1.5 percent, per month, service charge added. We shall have the option of halting work on your project when invoices are unpaid and overdue, unless mutual agreement is achieved. In the event that it is necessary for either party to incur legal expenses in connection with the performance of this contract, the prevailing party agrees to pay all court costs and attorney fees. 3) Compensation for services performed will not be contingent upon the necessity of the client to receive payment from other parties. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association and judgement upon the award rendered by the arbitration may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. 4) These rates are based upon procedures and methods outlined in the American Society of Civil Engineer's, Manual on Engineering Practice, Number 45. 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 • Laguna Mills, CA 92653 • (714) 46 )-0110 • FAX: 714) 460.0.13_ MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES June 24, 1997 Ms. Jayna Morgan, Senior Associate EDAW, Inc. 17875 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 400 Irvine, CA. 92714 Re: McDonnell Centre Business Parr Specific Plan Pear Jayna: i This letter is a follow-up to our conversation on the need m augment the Specific PI consulting contract. i As we discussed, the original proposal did not anticipate the comments to trigger all th� special meetings and rewrites which have been conducted. This extensive list O modifications to the text, maps and graphics of the Specific Plan has now bee completed. i I am requesting an. augmentation amount to address these additional scrviccs required fei completion of the draft Specific Plan. 11 If you have any questions or require additional information, pleasc contact me. Sincerely, Mike Adams 1 401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92860-2725 MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES Adams Asaooiatcs proposes to provide the outlined services on a time and materials basis with fees not to exceed the following: Mtimated Budget: Text & Graphics Modifications and Presentation Displays - Total: 52,000 'A Non Budgeted Meetings {6 - 21hr. meetings - 12 hrc, [a) S 125 Total: S1,500 A.dditinnaf Revisions and Rewrftes (40 hrs. @. S125) Total: $5,000 Total Budget:58.500 1401 Quail Street, Sulto 100. Newport Beach, CA. 92660.2725 MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES July 23, 1997 Ms. Jayna Morgan, Senior Associate EDAW, Inc. 17875 Von Kaman Avenue, Suite 400 Irvine, CA. 92714 Rf: McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan Dear Jayna: This letter is a follow-up to our conversation on the need to augment the Specific Plan consulting contract in anticipation of the Planning Commission and City Council meetings and any subsequent changes to the document. The original proposal did not anticipate the need for all the special meetings and rewrites which may occur as a result of the City review process. Any modifications to the text, maps and graphics of the Specific Plan will need to be completed concurrent with or subsequent to the Public Hearing process. I have prepared an augmentation budget to address these additional services which may be required for completion of the Specific Plan. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me. 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 • MICHAEL C. ADAMS ASSOCIATES Adams Associates proposes to provide the outlined services on a time and materials basis with fees not to exceed the following: Estimated Budget: Text & Graphics Modifications and Presentation Displays Total $2,000.00 Additional Meetings (8 - 2/hr. meetings = 16 hrs. @ $125) Total: $2,000.00 Revisions and Rewrites (20 hrs. @ $125) Total $2,500.00 a Total Budget: $6,500.00 1401 Quail Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA. 92660-2725 ATTACHMENT 3 lb Certificate of insurance • Agency Name and Address: THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE INSURANCE BROKERS, INC. 10 CALIFORNIA STREET INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE REDWOOD CITY CA 94063-1513 AFFORDED THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW. (415) 369-5900 Fax: (415) 386.1455 Insureds Name and Address: Companies Affording Policies: EDAW INC. llyj l �� �D D 753 DAVIS STREET �� SAN FRANCISCQ CA 94111 A: AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS a: AMERICAN MANUFACTURERS c D AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE CO. - KSA E: CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY F: COVERAGES: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INO.CATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY RZQUIREMQNT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WIT)+ RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS- EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDITIONS OF S;.CH POLICIES. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER EFF. DATE EXP. DATE GENERAL LIABILITY Commercial General Liability 7KQ409MI-00 711197 711198 Claims Made A Occurrence C Owner's and Contractors Protective 17 AUTO LIABILITY _ .J Any Automobile 7KQ409001-00 711197 711198 All Owned Autos Scheduled Autos B - Hired Autos r - L Non -owned Autos G== L Garage Liability C - _ EXCESS LIABILITY D� h ' C Umbrella Form _J J Other than Umbrella I:orm D WORKERS' COMPENSATION Anir` W2s5534t]r^ AND EMPLOYER'$ LIABILITY E PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY` AEN8234067 3124/97 3124198 F POLICY LIMITS General Aggregate: $2,000,000 Products-Com/Ops Aggregate: $2,000,000 Personal and Adv. Injury: $1,000,000 Each Occurrence: $1,000,000 Fire Dmg. (any one fire): S500,000 Combined Single Limit: $1,000,000 Bodily Injury/person: SO Bodily Injury/accident: $0 Property Damage: Each Occurrence: Aggregate: Statutory Limits Each Accident: $1,000,000 DiseaselPolicy Limit: $1,000,000 Disease/Employee: $1,000,000 Aggregate $1,000,000 Description of Operations/Locations/Vehicles/Restrictions/Special Items: All operations of the Named Insured. General Liability only: The City of Huntington Beach, its officers and employees are named as additional insureds but only as respects liability arising aut of the Named Insureds' operations in the Preparation of McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 81 EIR, project # 6N 116.01; such coverage is primary as respects any insurance carried by the additional insured with respect to work performed by the Named Insured. -written at aggregate limits of liability not less than amount shown. Certificate Holder: THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 3RD FLOOR 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92M ATTN: MS. JULIE SAKAGUCHI THE AGGREGATE LIW-T IS THE TOTAL INSURANCE AVA,LABLE FOR CLAIMS PRESENTED WITHIN THE POLICY FOR ALL OPERATIONS OF THE INSURED - CANCELLATION: SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT - Authorized Repr entat' 8114197 MH cc: 4 4LERICAN MANUFACTURERS ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 9�a-I9 7 PROGRAM ENDORSEMENT THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following BUSINESSOWNERS POLICY for: Insured: EDAW, INC. Policy: 7KQ409001-00 Effective: 7/1/97-7/1/98 A. Primary Coverage With respect to claims arising out of the operations of the Named Insured, such insurance as afforded by this policy is priman, and is not additional to or contributing with any other insurance carried by or for the benefit of the Additional Insureds. B. Cross Liability Clause The naming of more than one person, firm or corporation as insureds under this policy shall not, for that reason alone, extinguish any rights of the insured against another, but this endorsement, and the naming of multiple insureds, shall not increase the total liability of the Company under this policy. C. Notice of Cancellation 1. If we cancel this policy for any reason other than non-payment of premium, we will mail written notice at least 30 days before the effective date of cancellation to the Additional Insureds on file with the Company. 2. If we cancel this policy for non-payment of premium, we will mail written notice at least 10 days before the effective date of cancellation to the Additional Insureds on file with the Company. ADDITIONAL INSURED The City of Huntington Beach, its officers and employees TYPE OF OPERATION Preparation of Mc Donnell Centre Buisness Park Specific Plan & EIR, Project m 6N 116.01 A� AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE August 14, 1997 Department: l',►-,►��,� - COVER PAGE REQUEST FOR LATE SUBMITTAL (To accompany RCA) ,eoom � Subject n, rnerx�rr+en+5 � , ins. Council Meeting Date: 9 •z • 9-7 i.::. Date of This Request: •y7 REASON (Why is this RCA being submitted late?): clej, &A IA- C'-r+14 A,+6,v .,4'5 I EXPLANATION- - .."I inrppm- - M-2- Zra, �J— r - CONSEQUENCE5 How shall delay of this RCA adversely impact the City \. 0003982.01 07114/94 11, CITY OF HUNTINGTOP BEACH �.l ` 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK November 21, 1996 McDonnell MDRC Company 4060 Lakewood Boulevard, 6th Floor Long Beach, CA 90808 Attn: Thomas A. Overturf Dear Mr. Overturf: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at the regular meeting held July 1, 1996, approved execution of the enclosed Reimbursement Agreement between the city and McDonnell MDRC Company. Enclosed is a duly executed copy of the agreement for your records. Sincerely, Connie Brockway City Clerk Enclosure: Agreement G : fol Io«vup : agrrlttl tr/S i mp le. j c (Telephone; 714-5 36-5227 ) 0 ?hlp GQC4 c-stA TwV 4)1.� �yI - AdA4.zl jaltr, Council/Agency Meeting Held: 711114, Deferred/Continued to:' ❑ Approved R"Cond0-1 itionally proved ❑ Denied City Clerk's na ure Council Meeting Date: July 1, 1996 Department ID Number: Cg9696-32= CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION n: m r- { SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS r_ SUBMITTED BY: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Adminis rator , _7 PREPARED BY: MELANIE S. FALLON, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: co Re" bursement Agreement with McDonnell Douglas Realty Company anontract with EDAW, Inc. for Planning Consulting Services for Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report Statement of Issue, Funding Source, Recommended Action, Alternative Action(s), Analysis, Environmental Status, Attachments} Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is a request to enter into an agreement with McDonnell Douglas Realty Company to cover the planning consulting costs for the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approval of the contract with EDAW, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $157,974.00, for Planning Consulting services for preparation of Specific Plan and EIR. Funding Source: The consulting costs are to be borne by McDonnell Douglas Realty Company through approval of the reimbursement agreement. Therefore, there will be no effect on the City's budget. Recommended Action: Motion to: A. "Approve the reimbursement agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and McDonnell Douglas Realty Company for consulting costs associated with preparation of the McDonnell Business Centre Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report, not to exceed $157,974.00; and L 1 B. Approve the professional services agreement with the firm of EDAW, Inc. for preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report, at a fee not to exceed $157,974.00." Alternative Actions : 1. Deny the request and direct staff to recirculate the Request for Proposal. • *QUEST FOR CIPLINCIL ACT& MEETING DATE: July 1, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD96-32 Analysis: Specific Plan The McDonnell Douglas Realty Company has submitted an application for preparation of a specific plan and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the McDonnell Centre Business Park. The project site conists of the entire 307 acre area bounded on the north by Rancho Road and the US Navy railroad right-of-way, on the east by Springdale Street, on the south by Bolsa Avenue and on the west by Bolsa Chica Street. Aproximately 173.40 acres of the 307 acres are developed or entitled to be developed; these areas include the existing McDonnell Douglas Aerospace and Cambro facilities and approved Sharp Electronics facility. (A more detailed breakdown of the site has been provided as Attachment No. 6.) The main intent of the specific plan is to achieve the following: (1) Prevent further piecemeal development of the area; (2) Allow for development of a mix of Industrial, Commercial/Retail/ Office Uses on the 307 acre site and in the project vicinity; (3) Create a distinguishable character for the McDonnell Business Park area through creation and implementation of design guidelines;and (4) Facilitate future development of the site by allowing subsequent projects, that are consistent with the Specific Plan, to be processed without additional entitlement. Due to the current workloads and staffing constraints and the applicant's desire to expedite processing of the project, the applicant has agreed to reimburse the city for the costs of having the Specific Plan and EIR prepared by a consulting firm. The consulting firm is to function as an extension of staff. The selection process is described below. Consultant Selection Process In order to prepare the specific plan and associated environmental documents, the City of Huntington Beach sent out a Request for Proposal (RFP) to find a consultant team that has demonstrated experience in the preparation of environmental impact reports, and specific plans that address a mix of industrial, commercial and residential development and emphasizes urban design principles. Staff distributed a Request for Proposal to six (6) qualified planning consulting firms. The following two (2) firms responded to the request by submitting packages detailing their experience, expertise, fee structure and scope of work for the project. Copies of the proposals by EDAW and Planning Consultants Research and Planning Company Associates (PCRIPCA) have been provided as Attachments 4 and 5, respectively. CD96-32.DOC -2- 06/20/96 11:01 AM 9 @QUEST FOR CIPLINCIL ACT MEETING DATE: July 1, 1996 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CD96-32 Firm 1. EDAW, Inc. 2. Planning Consultants Research Cost $157, 974 $209, 520 To evaluate the proposals, the Community Development Department staff and a representative of McDonnell Douglas reviewed the submittals and interviewed the firms' proposal teams. After careful consideration, the staff and the applicant agree that the firm of EDAW, Inc. offers the best combination of experience, expertise, project approach, accessibility, and price. EDAW's project manager and sub -consultant team have prepared earlier environmental documents on portions of the site and are familiar with the City's issues. Staff has met with the project team and believes that they have a clear understanding of both the applicant's and the City's goals for the project and have proposed a scope of work that best addresses these needs. The firm has demostrated extensive experience in Specific Plan preparation and has a strong background in design. Environmental Status: The selection of a consultant to prepare planning documents does not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and therefore is not subject to the provisions of CEQA. However, the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan will be subject to CEQA and will require preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The EIR shall be prepared and processed in conjunction with the Specific Plan and will comply with the provisions of CEQA. Attachments : C D96-32. DOC 1 Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and McDonnell Douglas Realty Company, Inc. for Reimbursement of Consulting Costs Associated with the Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report 2 Contract Between the City of Huntington Beach and EDAW, Inc. for Preparation of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report. 3 Insurance Certificates 4 Proposal by EDAW, Inc., Dated April 25, 1996 5 Proposal by PCRIPCA, Dated April 25, 1996 6 Break Down of Existing and Vacant Property in the McDonnell Business Park Specific Plan Area -3- 06/20/96 11:01 AM • SPECIFIC PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL EMPACT REPORT REAVIBURSEMENT AGREEMENT This Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report Reimbursement Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of 1996, by and between McDONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY COMPANY, IKC.,a California corporation ("MDRC"), and the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation and charter city of the State of California ("City"), with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A. On 1996, MDRC applied to the City for approval of a Specific Plan and Environmental Impact4keport for the McDonnell Centre Business Park on the Property depicted on Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the "Business Park"). B. The City desires to engage the services of a Consultant to provide Planning Consulting Services for preparation of the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report for the Business Park, subject to reimbursement from MDRC. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements contained herein and other valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties hereto, the parties covenant and agree as follows: - Section 1. Pre aration of the Specific Plan and Environmental Im act Report. City shall contract with EDAW to prepare a Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report for the Business Park. Section 2. Reimbursement of Consulting. City shall be entitled to reimbursement of all costs associated with the preparation of the Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report for the Business Park, regardless of whether the Planning Commission and City Council approve, conditionally approve or deny the Specific Plan or Environmental Impact Report. The reimbursement shall be consistent with the project schedule budget attached hereto as Exhibit B, and shall not exceed $157,974.00, absent a change order. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Consultant's contract with the City, City shall pay all invoices of the Consultant. The City will then invoice MDRC for the amount paid to the Consultant, which amount MDRC shall pay the City within 30 days of receipt of the invoice. 3 Section 3. Change Orders. MDRC shall pay all invoices in connection with reasonable change orders. Under no condition shall City approve any change orders without first consulting with and obtaining the approval of MDRC.;z t SFIs: PCD:Agree: Specific 6121196 -03 8/15/96 Section 4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, undertakings or agreements relating thereto. Section 5. Authority. Each signatory hereto warrants to the other party its authority to sign on behalf of the party for whom it purports to sign. Section 6. No Oral Modification. It is mutually understood and agreed that no alteration or variation of this Agreement shall be valid or binding unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto. Section 7. Notices. Any notices shall be in writing and shall be sent postage prepaid, by a nationally recognized overnight courier service or by first-class or registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or by facsimile, addressed as follows: To City: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attn: Melanie Fallon To MDRC: c/o McDonnell MDRC Company 4060 Lakewood Boulevard 6th Floor Long Beach, California 90808 Attn: Thomas A. Overturf or to such other address as City or MDRC may from time to time designate by written notice to the other. Notice shall be deemed given upon,delivery or refusal to accept delivery as indicated by return receipt or, in the case of a nationally recognized overnight courier service, by such similar document, or in the case of delivery by facsimile, upon confirmation of receipt by the stated addressee. Section 8. Successors and _Assign s. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns, including, without limitation, subsequent owners. Section 9. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which when executed shall constitute one and the same instrument. Section 10. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California. 2 SFATCD: agree: Specific 6121/96 - #2 8%1396 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto as of the date first written above. ATTEST: } City Clerk ,9CIFINtl CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH a mM,,_poratio By: Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 16 INITIATED AND APPROVED: Director of Community Development SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 3 Sr/s: PCD: Agree:Specific 6121196.42 9115i96 "MDRC" MCDONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY COMPANY, INC. a California corvora6em- By: - (print name) ` ItS: (circle one) Chairman/Presiden tce President By: (print name) ItS: (circle one) Secretary/Chief Financial Officer/ Asst. Secretary -Treasurer 4 SFi s:PCD:Agree: Specific 6%21I96 - V2 811 ]i96 . EDIT A S PLANNING McDonnell Centre Business Park Property la SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 9-5—II CITY OF LEGEND: HUNTINGTON BELCH ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USE OF PROPERTY MAP WESTMINSTER 90LSA n w N AVE I I EXHIBIT B. VI. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND BUDGET A PROJECT SCHEDULE i EDAW is prepared to start this project immediately upon authorisation by the City. We will submit all wok in accordance with the graphic project schedule outlined at the end of this section. This schedule will be defined in more detail as discussed in Task 1.0 of our Work Program. We anticipate that all work described herein related to the Specific Plan and EIR can be accomplished within 10 months. This timeframe may be shortened following discussions with City staff regarding necessary reviews. BUDGET EDAW will complete the Scope of Services for a not -to -exceed budget of $138,910.00 not including the optional tasks and contingency. MAW prefers to bill monthly on a time and materials basis with each invoice containing a detailed description of services performed during the billing period and proof of work completed will be provided upon request of the City. The following provides an overall budget summary by task and a breakdown of printing and expense costs. The budget also includes a 10% labor contingency per the City's direction. EDAW TASK 1.0 PROJECT INTTUMN TASK 20 DEVELOPMENT OF SPECITC PLAN DOCUMLNNT TASK 3.0 PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS TASK 4.0 PROJECT MEE INGSAEARINGS SUBTOTAL ALL TASKS (without optional tasks) SUBTOTAL ALL TASKS (with optional Tasks 3.1 and 3.2 and distribution of the Draft and lr tnal EiRs) 0:16NI IWWROPOSALDM $3.440.00 $8,500.00 $72,000.00 • $8,800.00 $92,740.00 $979740.00 Exhibit B Page 1 of 2 '. � i SUBCONSULTANTS Weston Pringle Associates' Langdon Wilson or architect selected by City and applicant Gordon Bricken & Associates (including optional noise measurements) 2 Subtotal All Subeonsultants (including optional noise measurements) Subtotal All Tasks and Subconsultants (without optional) Labor Contingency of 10% EXPENSES Mileage and Travel, Delivery, Postage, Miscellaneous Supplies, In -House xerox, fax, Blueprinting, and Photo Reproduction services $28,200.00 $5,000.00 $950.00 $34,150.00 $125,940.00 $12,594.00 err �i Printing' $6,970.00 Optiorad Initial Sasdy/NOP - 65 copies (S8.00 per copy/S520.00) "(without initial study) ADE1R and DER - 73 copies (S50.00 per copy/S3.650.00) $7,490.00 Draft Fund EIR and Final Elm - 41 copies (S80.00 per oapy/33,280 00) (with initial Study) Findings and Oveniders - 5 copies ($8.00 per copy/540.00) Subtotal without optional initial study Subtotal with optional initial study TOTAL ALL TASKS INCLUDING OPTIONAL TASKS (without contingency) TOTAL ALL TASKS WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS (Tasks 3.1 and 32, distribution of Drab and Final EMs and optional ambient noise measurements at 5 locations) TOTAL ALL TASKS INCLUDING OPTIONAL TASKS (Tasks 3.1 and 3.2, distribution of Draft and Final EIRs and optional ambient noise measurements at 5 locations) and including 10% contingency $129970.00 $139490.00 $145,380.00 $1389910.00 $157,974.00 1 Wesson Pringle budget includes a $4,000.00 fee to obtain Clry model rues from rite City trafi9c model Consultant 2 Gondon Sdd= tit Associates optional ambient noise measmemaus $450.00 fast location and $125.00 per location (assume 5 loatiows 3 Printing cam are based on the above breakdown by deliverables. copies of draft and final docume= have bees aunbincd into total numbers. , 4 Assumes DER Teduncal Appendicesp is not r:tnred with FuW EIIt. 0:16N 11600ftOAOSAI MM Exhibit B Page 2 of 2 0 0 CERTIFIED COPY k OF f BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION The undersigned, Michael C. Dra,,in, as Secretary of McDonnell Douglas Realty Company (the "Corporation "), hereby certifies that the following resolutions were duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation by unanimous written consent dated January 10, 1995, and that such resolutions have not been amended, modified or rescinded and remain in full force and effect as of the dare hereof. - RESOLVED, that Stephen J. Barker, Philip W. C} burl and Thomas A. Overturf be and they hereby are each authorized and empowered to execute and deliver, in the name and on behalf of the Corporation, any and all agreements, contracts, instruments, records, papers and other documents and writings, with the power to redelegate such authorization (without the power of further redelegation) by a specific written delegation of authority to any employee assigned to a department or group which reports, directly or indirectly, to such delegating officer. Dated thlsA? � day of , 1996 Michael C. Dram, Secr ary FORM.131 F08t-V brand tax transmittal memo 7671 rat its r r! From y�� Dapt. V P11an• d 41.2 7 Few It JL-1 - J Fax # 10 -&Z 7 —21 lam- Certificate of Insurance 600• �a �,�.� �__7 � j Agency Name and Address, THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A,MATTER OF I INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON Professional Practice Insurance Brokers, Inc. I I THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES 10 California Street I NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE Redwood City CA 94063-1513 I AFFORDED THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW. (415) 389-5800 Fax (415) 368-1455 Insureds Name and Address: Companies Affording Policies: I A' ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY EDAW, INC. B ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY 753 Davis Street D AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE CO. San Francisco CA 94111 E: CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY F: I COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WH:CH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS. AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES TYPEOF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER EFF. DATE EXP. DATE GENERAL LIABILITY I IQ Commercial General Liability ❑ Claims Made A' ❑X Occurrence CP05181149-08_>_"r-{ 71,1.St35 U&1196 X❑ Owners and Contractors ( ;T1, L C., Protective isTY ATf'OP- AUTO LIABILITY 1 ❑ Any Automobile D9 3' i ty A torney 1 ❑ All Owned Autos I 1 ❑ Scheduled Autos B 10 Hired Autos CP05181149-08 7!1195 711196 i © Non -owned Autos I . ❑ Garage Liability I ❑ Al D1. jiLC! I r, r i EXCESS LIABILITY I, 1 C ' ❑ Umbrella Form ❑ Other than Umbrella Form WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' 3CW235534 05 911195 LIABILITY I PROFESSIONAL I E 1 LIABILITY* ;F�l I I� I AEN8234067 ENT AT;- I 41WI :: 3/24/96 I 3/24197 I I POLICY LIMITS General Aggregate: $2.000,000 i I Products-ComlOps : Aggregate: $2,000,000 ; Personal and AdV. Injury: $1,000,000 I ; Each Occurrence: $1,000,000 i Fire Dmg. (any one fire): $1,000.000 I ; Combined Single Limit: $1,000,000 Bodily Injurylperson: Bodily Injurylaccident: I, Property Damage: I i i I II I� Each Occurrence: I I d�egate: I I II I Statutory Limits I j Each Accident: $1,000,000 I I Disease/Policy Limit: $1,000.000 I IDiseasefEmployee: $1,000,000 1 AAggregate �I $1.000,000 , I I II Description of Operations/LocationsNehicles/Restrictions/Special Items: All operations of the Named Insured. General Liability only: The City of Huntington Beach, its offices and employees are named as additional insureds but only as respects liability arising out of the Named Insureds' operations In the Preparation of McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan 8 EIR, project # 6N116.01; such coverage is primary as respects any insurance carried by the additional insured with respect to work performed by the Named Insured. *Written at aggregate limits of liability not less than amount shown. Certificate Holder THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 3RD FLOOR 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92M ATTN: JULIE OSUGI THE AGGREGATE LIMIT is THE TOTAL INSURANCE AVAILABLE FOR CLAIMS PRESENTED WIT> 4 Tr:E POLICY FOR ALL OPERATIONS OF THE INSURED. CANCELLATION: SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR - REPRESENTATIVES WILL MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, EXCEPT IN THE EVENT OF CANCELLATION FOR NON. PAYMENT OF PREMIUM IN WHICH CASE 10 DAYS NOTICE WILL BE GIVEN- I 1 I A ed Representative: 6/13196 kh I cc - ` * ZURICH-AMERICAN ljJRANCE GROUP TOPII COMMERCIAL INSURANCE PACKAGE POLICY _ COVERAGE CHANGE ENDORSEMENT Insurance for this coverage part provided by: ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY EDAW, INC. CP05181149-08 EFFECTIVE 7/1/95-7/1/96 ADDITIONAL INSURED PRIMARY COVERAGE THIS ENDORSEMENT MODIFIES INSURANCE PROVIDED UNDER THE FOLLOWING: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART IT IS AGREED THAT ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION DESCRIBED BELOW IS AN ADDITIONAL IN5URED, BUT ONLY WITH RESPECT TO LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OPERATIONS PERFORMED FOR THE ADDITIONAL INSURED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE NAMED INSURED. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED TO SUCH ADDITIONAL INSURED IS PRIMARY AND SHALL NOT CONTRIBUTE IN ANY WAX WITH ANY OTHER INSURANCE WHICH SUCH ADDITIONAL INSURED MAY HAVE. ALL OTHER ENDORSEMENTS, PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS, AND EXCLUSIONS OF THIS INSURANCE SHALL REMAIN UNCHANGED AND APPLY TO THE ADDITIONAL INSURED DESCRIBED BELOW. ADDITIONAL INSURED TYPE OF'OPERATION PROJECT LOCATION THE CITY OF HUN'TINGTON BEACH PREPARATION OF MCDONNELL ITS OFFICERS NED EMPLOYEES CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN & EIR PROJECT #6N116.01 01 T11.100-A (01 /93) Page 1 Last page HUNTINGTON BEACH TOMORROW, INC. P.O. Box 865 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-4183 July 1, 1996 Mayor and City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RECEIVED fiCTY -LERN V! Y L-` HUNTING T ON ;_-;7 !i. LALIr. � 8 09 All 196 /- Re: Preparation of McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report/Agenda Item E-8 Dear Mayor Sullivan and Members of the City Council, We have taken notice that this specific plan calls for an optional residental development element. The residents of this community as well as our organization, vigorously oppose any residental elements that would erode our industrial land base. We can not stress this enough! We feel that the language suggesting that any residental element, whether optional or not, be struck from this agreement. As you are aware, residental development does not fully support its impact on the entire community concerning the general fund. Therefore, we must take a stand at the beginning of these agreements to keep these residential "pockets" from forming. Further, we believe that if the language were to be allowed, you will setting a precedent which will effect this city in future years. Again, we urge you to strike the language allowing any residential development on our industrial and commercial property and uphold the General Plan. Thank you. Sincerely, wodo!�� Bob Biddle president COPIES A VAILA BLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ATTACHMENT 4 ROLM AvEhlJI' I SITE PLAN Proposal to Prepare a Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report for 7he oWcOonnell)Wnftre BUSINESS PARK prepared for., The City of Huntington Beach prepared [n: E. L).-11t I n . APRIL 25, 1996 A PF,, 2 5 1996 PROPOSAL FOR McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK Master Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan and Related Services Prepared for: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2000 MAIN STREET HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 CONTACT: MR. HOWARD ZELEFSKY PLANNING DIRECTOR (714) 536-5271 Prepared by: EDAW, INC. 1920 MAIN STREET, SUITE 450 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714 (714) 660-8044 APRIL 1996 r TABLE OF CONTENTS Z. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1 IL PROJECT UNDERSTANDING/CONTRACT RESPONSIBILITIES ........................... 3 III, SCOPE OF WORK........................................................................................................... Iv. PROJECT PERSONNEL.................................................................................................. 6 48 V. QUALIFICATIONS.......................................................................................................... 51 VI. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND BUDGET......................................................................... 56 VILREFERENCES................................................................................................................... 60 VM. AUTHORIZATION............................................................................................................ 62 APPENDICES APPENDIX A - FEE SCHEDULE, SCHEDULE OF INSURANCE, AND EDAW RESUMES APPENDIX B - LANGDON WILSON ARCHITECTURAL PLANNERS APPENDIX C - WESTON PRINGLE ASSOCIATES APPENDIX D - GORDON BRICKEN ASSOCIATES 0A 6N l 16005PROPOSAL.DOC �� 1 f It 1 Ll I 1 1' 1 11 11 fl 0:16N] 16001PROPOSA]_DOC I. INTRODUCTION t I. INTRODUCTION EDAW, Inc. (EDAW) is pleased to submit this proposal for preparation of the McDonnell Centre ' Business Park Specific Plan and Master Environment Impact Report (EIR). Completion of the work program outlined in this proposal will provide the City of Huntington Beach with a comprehensive planning and environmental program that will meet and exceed the needs and objectives of the community. The products of this planning process will provide the elected and appointed officials of Huntington Beach with meaningful solutions to the actual and perceived problems. The analysis and presentation of information will be through, objective and legally defensible. p g� objective, g Y EDAW is a multi -disciplinary firm, with more than half a century of experience in the fields of environmental planning, urban planning and design, and landscape architecture. We have a strong track record in providing planning documents for communities throughout California. rEDAW's consulting services include: • Environmental Impact Analysis • Landscape Architecture • Land Planning • Urban Design • Site Engineering • Graphic Design EDAW is well suited to prepare the comprehensive planning and environmental services program It required by the City of Huntington Beach for several reasons. First, the EDAW team has extensive knowledge of the major environmental, planning, legal, community, and political issues which the City of Huntington Beach may encounter as they formulate and implement the environmental program for this project. Formerly of STA Planning, Inc., our environmental staff has prepared numerous projects for the City of Huntington Beach, including EIR 91-2 which analyzed 52 acres of the proposed project site. Our senior planner has also completed work in the City of Huntington Beach. Second, EDAW staff has experience with projects of similar nature and scope. Mr. Don Smith will serve as Principal -in -Charge for the project. Ms. ]ayna Morgan will serve as Project Manager. Mr. Ron Krater will serve as Project Planner. They will be assisted by various support staff. We assure the City that these individuals will have continued "hands-on" involvement in the project. Third, EDAW is knowledgeable of all recent changes in current court rulings pertaining to the interpretation of the State Planning, Zoning and Development Laws, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the State CEQA Guidelines. These changes are incorporated into the preparation and processing of EDAW's planning and environmental documents. We prepare legally defensible documents of the highest quality that address objectively all major issues. Fourth, EDAW has assembled a project team that includes the traffic engineering firm Weston Pringle Associates, and the firm Gordon Bricken Associates. Both of these firms completed technical studies for the previous McDonnell Douglas Project EIR 91-2. EDAW and its subconsultants have a well established working relationship. Our subconsultants are familiar with development issues in Huntington Beach. The EDAW team is reared to conduct the work program addressed in this proposal in a cost- effective P � P P effective and time -efficient manner. 0:16N11&KQR0posALDoc 2 ! i t 4" ,l I I .1 I..' H. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING/CONTRACT RESPONSIBILITIES 0A 6N I i6o(APROPOSAL.DOC 3 1 • • tII. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING/CONTRACT RESPONSIBILITIES PROJECT DESCRIPTION Per our review of the March 1 and April 17, 1996 Request for Proposals and through our discussions with City staff and the applicant, we understand that the McDonnell Centre Business Park project consists of approximately 307 acres, of which 173.40 acres are developed or entitled for development. The site is bounded on the north by Rancho Road and the U.S. navy railroad right-of-way, on the east by Springdale Street, on the south by Bolsa Avenue and on the west by Bolsa Chica Street. The land use summary for the site is as follows: McDonnell Douglas Aerospace (Aerospace Operations) .......................... McDonnell Centre Business Park.............................................................. 120 acres 93 acres Cambro................................................................................. 11.9 acres Sharp.................................................................................... Phase I 23.4 acres $.0 acres (vacant) Phase H................................................................................. 14.5 acres (vacant) Phase III ................................................................................ 35.3 acres (vacant) Mixed Use Office Complex........................................................................ 18 acres Vacant Perimeter......................................................................................... 58 acres Street, Roads, etc....................................................................................... 18 acres Total'. Area.................................................................................................. 307 acres Of the 133.60 acres of vacant land, Phase III (Planning Areas 3 and 4 - 93.3 acres) have not been analyzed previously in a site -specific environmental document. Planning Area 2, which includes Phase I (eight acres) and Phase II (14.5 acres) was the area covered by EIR No. 91-2. Although this previous EIR analyzed the impacts of a different "preferred" project (i.e., 1,307 multi -family residential units and 109,000 square feet of general retail uses), the baseline environmental analysis of Planning Area 2 is contained in this previous EIR. EDAW will utilize pertinent information from this EIR and the more recent negative declarations No. 95-6 and No. 93-24 for the Sharp Electronics and Cambro Manufacturing (also within Planning Area 2) in drafting the Master EIR for the proposed project. Since our team and project manager have a first-hand understanding of the previous work done for the site, there will not be a duplication of previous work efforts. EDAW also understands that the City is close to adopting their Updated General Plan. The updated elements along with their respective technical reports will also be utilized by our team in drafting the Master EIR. I I : 0A 6N 116WROPOSALtM 1. 4 As discussed in more detail in Section III of this proposal, EDAW understands that we will be responsible for reviewing a draft Specific Plan prepared by the applicant which includes zoning standards to support the proposed uses for Phases I, H and III of Research and Design, Distribution, Office, and Manufacturing as outlined in the RFP supplement. We also understand that the Specific Plan and Master EIR should be drafted to analyze a variety of land uses for the vacant acres. These alternative land uses may include development of a small power center, hotel, restaurants, and theater. The Specific Plan/Master EIR will also consider a residential component on 12 acres of the site at densities ranging from 12 to 15 units per acre. Through our past work efforts with the City, we understand our role in this project will be an extension of City staff. The EDAW team will function in the following capacity as: • Provider of technical information • Provider of unbiased recommendations • Public educator • Solicitor of public input • Organizer • Consensus builder • Provider of creative design solutions to potential land use conflicts In addition to the issues discussed above, EDAW believes that projects of this magnitude have important functional and organizational issues. These key issues that EDAW intends to address through our work program include: • The need for an integrated approach to the planning, design, environmental, and circulation/safety issues involved in the comprehensive study. • The need to prepare all work products consistent with the objectives of the project and the expectations of the project team. • The need to maintain the adopted schedule and budget. • The need to balance jurisdictional, property owner, and community goals in order to develop a viable Specific Plan. DATA NEEDS FROM APPLICANT AND CITY STAFF r ` { Per page seven of the March 1, 1995 Request for Proposal, we foresee the following as key data needs required for the Specific Plan/EIR Program. They have been broken down by the members responsible for each item. As stated previously, EDAW's work program will avoid duplication of work efforts provided by others. 0A 6N 116001PROPOSAL.DOC t5 1 • . 1 Applicant Requested: 1. Draft Specific Plan 2_ Aerial Photo 3. Base Map 4. All Technical Studies done for the site (i.e., Preliminary Soils/Geology Report(s) or Phase I assessments) 5. Title Report 1 City Requested: 1. Negative Declaration No. 95-6 2. Negative Declaration No. 93-24 3. EIR No. 91-2 (EDAW has on file - prepared by EDAW staff) 4. EIR No. 80-2 5. Updated General Plan and technical studies 6. Adopted City format for CEQA documents (if available) 7. Current listing of utility purveyor contacts (if available) 8. Listing of discretionary actions to be covered by the Master EIR 9. Statement of project objectives required by Section 15124 of the California Environmental Quality Act (EDAW can provide City with a draft) 10. A listing of current related projects (including statistics) to be utilized in the cumulative impact analysis. This listing should include recently approved or proposed projects. EDAW will need to update listing on pages 25 - 27 of EIR 91-2. Ideally, EDAW would obtain the majority of data needs at our initial kick-off meeting. The timing for items not obtained at the kick-off meeting will be discussed during the kick-off meeting. See Task 1.0 of our Scope of Work. CHANGES IN SCOPE OF WORK The following section, "McDonnell Centre Business Park Scope of Work," outlines the scope and depth of analysis proposed by EDAW for completion of the Specific Plan and Master EIR. Any changes in the project description or unanticipated changes in the Scope of Work will constitute grounds for contract renegotiation. Per conversations with Ms. Julie Osugi, the project budget contained in Section IV of this proposal does contain a 10% contingency. INSURANCE COVERAGE EDAW carries one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate general liability and performance completion insurance with Zurich Insurance Company, full liability automobile coverage with Zurich Insurance Company, and Workers Compensation insurance with the American Motorist Insurance Company. A detailed Schedule of Insurance is provided in Appendix A. 0A 6N 116001PROPOSALDOC 1 6 iM. McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SCOPE OF WORK 1 1 4 G 1 OA 6N] 16DO%PROPOSALDOC 1 lii. McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SCOPE OF WORK h State law authorizes cities and counties to adopt Specific Plans for implementing their General Plans in designated areas. The Specific Plan is a useful bridge between the General PIan and individual development proposals. Government Code Section 65451 defines a Specific Plan to include "all detailed regulations, conditions, programs, and proposed legislation that shall be necessary or convenient for the systematic implementation" of each of the seven required elements in the General Plan. The section goes on to require that a Specific Plan include 'regulations, conditions, programs, and proposed legislation" with regards to: • The location of and standards for land uses and facilities; • The location of and standards for streets, roads, and other transportation facilities • Standards for population density and building intensity and provisions for supporting rservices; • Standards for the conservation, development, and use of natural resources; • Other appropriate measures. The Specific Plan must, at a minimum, contain measures to implement the policies required in a ' General Plan that pertain to the area. A Specific Plan can be used to update the general plan for the area and provide all relevant development standards. The Specific Plan should be prepared based upon existing environmental constraints. This will minimize required environmental documentation. We understand that it is of the utmost importance to prepare an environmental document and support materials which: • Meet all requirements and recent court interpretations of CE A • Identify and analyze all important issues in a comprehensive manner • Recommend a comprehensive package of mitigation measures that will resolve controversial issues • Reflect policies and goals Our team is prepared to assign staff and resources required to implement the scope of services from contract authorization to plan approval. We have sufficient staffing and production capabilities for all work tasks. The tasks for the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and Master EIR are listed on the following pages and discussed in detail in this section. t 0A 6N l 16"ROPOSALDW 1 8 1 0 & McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK ■ SPECIFIC PLAN AND MASTER EIR SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1.0 PROJECT INITIATION 1.1 Collect and Analyze Data 1.2 Project Schedule 1.3 Preliminary Staff/Project Strategy Meeting ITASK 2.0 DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC PLAN DOCUMENT 2.1 Administrative Draft Specific Plan (Review and provide comments) 2.2 Final Draft Specific Plan (Review and provide comments) 2.3 Final Specific PIan TASK 3.0 PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS 3.1 Initial Study/Notice of Preparation (NOP) (Optional) 3.2 Distribution of NOP (Optional) � 3.3 Evaluate NOP Responses and Refine Scope of Work 3.4 Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 3.5 Preparation and Distribution of the Draft EIR and Notice of Completion (NOC) �. 3.6 Response to Comments/Final EIR 3.7 Preparation and Distribution of Final EIR 3.8 Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program 3.9 Statement of Findings and Facts and Overriding Considerations 3.10 Preparation of Notice of Determination (NOD) TASK 4.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MEETINGS/HEARINGS 4.1 Project Kick-Off/Strategy Meeting - one (1) 4.2 City Staff/Project Team Meetings - three (3) 4.3 Workshop Meetings - two (2) 4.4 Planning Commission Hearings - three (3) 4.5 City Council Hearings - two (2) t 0A 6N] I MPROPOSAL.DOC 1 9 1 • • TASK 1.0 PROJECT INITIATION SUBTASK 1.1 COLLECT AND ANALYZE DATA The purpose of this subtask is to collect the existing database for the proposed project. All existing data to be provided by the applicant, and the City staff will be used in preparing the various work products outlined in this proposal. Concurrent with the collection of data, EDAW will work with the project team to clearly define their objectives and expectations of the process. To complete this subtask, EDAW will accomplish the following: 1. EDAW will meet with City staff and the applicant to obtain data requests outlined in this proposal and determine any additional data needs. 2. EDAW will review and analyze all existing data provided by the applicant and the City. 3. If necessary, EDAW will prepare and submit to City staff and the applicant a list of required additional information. 4. Upon receipt of all data, EDAW will prepare a comprehensive list of references to be used by the project team. Work Products: • Attendance at meeting with City staff and team members. • List of data needs. • Comprehensive list of references to be utilized. SUBTASK 1.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE The purpose of this task is to refine, adopt, and maintain the proposed schedule discussed in Section VI of this proposal. The project schedule will be reviewed and approved by the City. Any necessary changes to the project schedule will be made with concurrence by City staff, the applicant, and EDAW. A record of these changes will be made in writing and noted in the appropriate report or memorandum. To complete this subtask, we will accomplish the following: 1. The EDAW Project Manager will meet with the City staff and the applicant (see subtask 1.3). 2. Utilizing the schedule within this proposal as a base, a more definitive project schedule will be established with milestone dates for all work products. �r 0:151r 116"ROPOSALDOC 10 1 3. Ranges of dates for the meetings and public hearings will be outlined. 4. An on -going project schedule will be maintained. S. Copies of any changes to the project schedule will be provided to City staff, project team members, and the applicant. 6. Reasons for all changes in the schedule will be provided to City staff, project team members, and the applicant. Work Product: • Refined Project Schedule. SUBTASK 1.3 PROJECT HICK-OFF/STRATEGY MEETING The intent and purpose of this subtask is to discuss the parameters of the Specific Plan and provide a strategy to accomplish the City's and the applicants overall goals for the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan planning area. EDAW will work with the City staff, the applicant, and other interested parties to conduct all work efforts in an open environment that encourages and facilitates involvement and participation. Concurrent with the collection of information, the consultant team will work with City staff and the applicant to clearly define the objectives and expectations of the Specific Plan. Public participation and creation of "the vision" are important components of the process. The public workshops are discussed in Task 4.0 of this work program. This strategy meeting will also be oriented toward further defining the types of uses that meet the future needs and goals of the City and applicant. We should discuss the major opportunities on -site and any "fatal flaws" that can actually preclude or severely limit certain types of development. This philosophical exchange of ideas will result in a clear direction for the consultant team and an assurance that both the City and the applicant will get an effective and implementable Specific Plan. The project schedule Subtask 1.3 will also be discussed at the Project Strategy meeting. The following will be accomplished for this subtask: 1. The EDAW Project Manager will meet with City staff and the applicant. 2. A project strategy memorandum defining the City and applicant goals and objectives for the Specific Plan. Work Products: • Attendance at project strategy meeting. • Project Strategy Memorandum outlining City/applicant goals and objectives. 0A 6N116001PROPOSALDOC 11 1 • • TASK 2,0 DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC PLAN DOCUMENT SUBTASK 2.1 ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT SPECIFIC PLAN (Review and Comment) The Specific Plan document must be prepared to a detailed level of planning and design that will be appropriate for the Specific Plan process and subsequent approval. The Specific Plan document should describe in text and graphic format the character, Iocation, intensity and type of development and infrastructure improvements, and utility programs for the Specific Plan area. The project team will propose design solutions to assure the City of Huntington Beach that only projects of the highest quality will be built over the life of the Specific Plan. As part of our review, we will identify variations from the City's existing zoning code. The design guidelines will play an important role in creating a cohesiveness within the planning area that is also compatible with adjacent areas. ' As indicated in the April 17, 1996 RFP, the applicant has prepared an Administrative Draft Specific Plan (ADSP) document for review by the consultant. The EDAW team will provide written comments and direction on the ADSP to assure that the document includes criteria and standards to allow the greatest flexibility of future development options. Our team is prepared to redraft standards and criteria where necessary. The following is a general outline of items that our team will ensure are included in the Specific Plan document. SPECIFIC PLAN I. Summary The ADSP should include a condensed statement of the purpose, scope, and main ideas of !I the specific plan. II. Backgrournd/Introduction 1. The ADSP should describe overall purpose and function of the specific plan. 2. The ADSP should explain the planning process involved in developing the specific plan. 3. The ADSP should describe the general planning context of the area. 4. The ADSP should explain the existing conditions of the study area (e.g., ownership, land use history, potential for change, and environmental constraints and opportunities). I 0A 6N! 16l1D1PROP05ALDGC 1 12 1 0 0 1 III. Goals and Objectives 1. The ADSP should identify appropriate goals and objectives for the specific plan. 2. The ADSP should explain how these goals and objectives are consistent with the General Plan and how the specific plan implements the General Plan. IV. Development Plan and Standards Through our review and comment of the applicant's licant's document EDAW will revise and rewrite g where necessary the development standards and criteria in the Specific Plan. The standards will be drafted to allow for the flexibility of future market demands. The EDAW team will: 1. Determine the appropriate types, intensities, amounts, and locations of R&D uses, office uses, commercial uses, and hotel and/or residential. 2. Identify permitted land uses and zoning regulations tailored to those uses if different ' from City Zoning Code. 3. Modify or develop a set of land use diagrams, maps and/or figures necessary to illustrate the proposed standards and criteria. V. Transportation/Circulation Plan EDAW in conjunction with Weston Pringle will review and discuss the transportation/circulation plan identified in the ADSP that will be prepared by the applicant. The plan should: 1. Identify an internal circulation system that will support the future land uses. 2. Identify necessary ryROW requirements. 3. Identify the necessary transportation improvements inside and outside the specific plan area that will provide the traffic capacity for the proposed uses. 4. Identify linkages with existing and planned transit facilities. ' 5. Identify multi -use trails and pathways. VI. Infrastructure Plan Through our review and comment of the applicant's document, EDAW, in conjunction with the City's engineering department, will revise and redraft where necessary an infrastructure plan for inclusion in the Specific Plan. The plan should: 0.16N116WTROPOSA -DOC 13 1. Identify the sewer, water and storm drainage improvements necessary to support future uses. ' 2. Determine which facilities are required to serve the future development. 3. Locate and size these infrastructure facilities on an infrastructure diagram. VII. Community Facilities Plan Through our review and comment of the applicant's document, EDAW will revise and redraft a community facilities plan for inclusion in the Specific Plan. The EDAW team will assure the plan includes: I. The identification of school, park, police service, fire service, and other relevant community service needs I 2. A discussion of the community service facilities (if any) needed to be located within the specific plan area. VM. Design Guidelines Through our review and comment of the applicant's document, EDAW, in conjunction with Langdon Wilson (or an architectural firm mutually acceptable to the City and applicant), will revise and rewrite wherenecessary the design guidelines included in the ADSP prepared by the applicant. Our team will assure the document includes the following: 1 1. Overall urban design parameters for each land use. �. 0 Preliminary plan(s) sections and or elevations that illustrate the approved design intent. • Wall and fencing concept plan at an appropriate scale (elevation and material callouts of walls and fences). 2. Guidelines to ensure compatibility between land uses (e.g., between residential and commercial uses). • Written text and illustrations of grading techniques, landscape techniques, architectural theme(s), signage, walls, and other buffering techniques. • Plans, sections, or elevations to illustrate design concepts. 0A 6N I I6WROPOSAL.DOC 14 • I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 3. Transit, bikeway, and pedestrian trail guidelines, as appropriate. • Plans to illustrate the design intent with dimensions and landscape treatments as needed. • Sections and elevations that illustrate the approved intent i.e.: fencing, trail or bikeway construction specifications. • Text, as needed, to accompany illustrations to describe the approved design intent. 4. Design guidelines for public facilities as necessary, i.e. typical street lights, stop signs, landscape furniture, and fire hydrants. 5. Overall landscaping requirements including lists of recommended species, streetscape recommendations, entry treatments, etc. • Plant species lists. • Slope planting, streetscape, and open space planting concepts. • Plant list shall be native and drought -tolerant species that are compatible with the local climate and soils. DC. Implementation Measures Through our review and comment of the applicant's document, EDAW will revise and redraft where necessary the implementation measures included in the ADSP prepared by the applicant. Our team will assure the document includes the following: 1. Capital Improvement Program (EDAW budget assumes the applicant provides basic framework. No cost estimates will be prepared by EDAW staff.) 1. Cost estimates for the construction and maintenance of the proposed infrastructure and public facilities. 2. Phasing of these improvements. 3. Identification of funding sources. 4. Identification of the party responsible for completing improvements. 0:16N 116DUTROPOSAL DOC 15 2. Financing Strategy (EDAW budget assumes the applicant provides basic framework.) 1. A series of methods to finance project required infrastructure and any required community facilities. 2. A program for enacting financing methods. 3. Phasing Program (EDAW budget assumes the applicant provides basic framework.) 1. A preferred phasing schedule to implement the specific plan. 2. Identification of the level of infrastructure and other public improvements that should be provided in conjunction with each phase of development to avoid fiscal and environmental impacts to the City. X. Specific Plan Administration Through our review and comment of the applicant's document, EDAW will revise and redraft where necessary the administration discussion included in the document. We will ensure that this chapter includes: 1. A discussion of the process for future development (e.g., General Plan amendments, zoning, permits, etc.). 2. A discussion of any other actions that are necessary in order to implement the Plan effectively. 3. A discussion of the Specific Plan amendment and enforcement procedures. XI. Appendices IAt a minimum, the EDAW team will assure the ADSP appendices include the following: 1. The property's Legal Description. 2. The required General Plan Consistency Analysis. SUBTASK 2.2 FINAL DRAYr SPECIFIC PLAN Following the applicant's incorporation of comments from our team and appropriate City staff members, EDAW will complete a detailed review of the Final Draft Specific Plan to assure all comments were properly incorporated. If so desired by the City, the Final Draft Specific Plan will be distributed to the public with the Draft EIR as specified in Subtask 3.5. I OA 6NI 16WROPOSAL.DOC 1 16 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTASK 2.3 FINAL SPECIFIC PLAN Provided the applicant gives EDAW a computer copy of the Final Draft Specific Plan, EDAW will prepare a Final Specific Plan based upon direction from the Planning Commission and City Council. Work Products: • Redline copy of the Administrative Draft Specific Plan with a technical memorandum which provides further discussion and the reasoning for our proposed revisions. • Redline copy of the Draft Specific Plan identifying any proposed revisions which were not incorporated into the ADSP properly. • One (1) unbound reproducible original of the Final Specific Plan following the public hearing(s). • A computer disk copy of the Final Specific Plan on Microsoft Word (the City's present software). 0A 6N 11600TROPOSAL.DOC 1 17 TASK 3.0 PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS SUBTASK 3.1 INITIAL STUDY/NOTICE OF PREPARATION OP (Optional) (NOP) ( !P ) Although not specifically identified in the RFP, EDAW will prepare a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Initial Study to evaluate the environmental effects of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan project, if requested by City staff. The NOP/Initial Study will be prepared in accordance with City and State CEQA procedures. The NOP/Initial Study will be comprised of a Environmental Analysis Checklist and Explanations/ Discussion of the Environmental Analysis Checklist. The results of the NOP/Initial Study will be reviewed with staff. Comments will be incorporated and a Final NOP/Initial Study will be prepared. ' EDAW will use the following approach in preparing the NOP and Initial Study: 1. EDAW will prepare an Initial Study, according to CEQA requirements, the State CEQA Guidelines (Section 15063), and procedures of the City. The Initial Study will be prepared in accordance with the content requirements of recent case law, specifically Citizens Association for Sensible Development of Bishop Area vs. County of Inyo (1985) and Sundstrom vs. County of Mendocino (1988). A checklist of impacts and reasoned explanations of the findings of the study will be provided. 2. The Initial Study will be based upon published information, including but not limited to, EIR #91-2, Negative Declarations 95-6 and 93-24, the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Update EIR, technical reports completed and submitted by the applicant to the City, and the minutes of the public scoping meeting (see Task 4.3). 3. Issues for which no significant impacts will occur (therefore needing no additional consideration) will be identified along with topics that will require further evaluation in the EIR. The scope of the study for each topic to be included in the EIR will be reviewed. 4. A draft Initial Study will be prepared for review by the City of Huntington Beach. Following receipt of comments on the draft Initial Study, the final Initial Study will be ' revised for distribution by EDAW (if so desired by the City) with the Notice of Preparation and State Clearinghouse Notice of Completion form. IOptional Work Products: • Five (5) copies of the draft Initial Study. • One (1) reproducible copy of the final Notice of Preparation and Initial Study. 0 One (1) State Clearinghouse form. I 0A 6N 116MXPROPOSAL.DOC 18 1 • • ISUBTASK 4.2 DISTRIBUTION OF NOP (Optional) 1 1 1 I 1 Although not specifically identified in the RFP, EDAW will prepare the NOP and distribute it to the mailing list approved by the City of Huntington Beach. The Initial Study will be sent with the NOR As required by Section 15082 of the CEQA Guidelines, the NOP shall be sent by certified mail to all Federal, Responsible, and Trustee agencies that will be involved in approval of the project. A draft of the NOP will be provided for review and approval by City staff prior to distribution. Optional Work Products: • Fifty (50) copies of the Notice of Preparation/Initial Study, mailed to local, Federal, Responsible, and Trustee agencies, and other interested agencies/individuals. • Ten (10) copies of the Notice of Preparation mailed to State and Regional Clearinghouses. SUBTASK 4.3 EVALUATE NOP RESPONSES AND REFINE SCOPE OF WORK After receipt of Notice of Preparation responses, EDAW will identify issues for which no significant impacts will occur (to be described as effects found not to be significant in the EIR) and identify potentially significant impact topics, discussed during the scoping process, that will require further evaluation in the EIR. A memorandum will be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach summarizing issues identified in the scoping process, and suggestions to the project scope if deemed necessary. It is not anticipated that the scope of work and budget proposed in this document would require augmentation beyond the contingency. Work Product: • Five (5) copies of a memorandum suggesting refinements, if needed, to the scope of work, the schedule, and the budget for the EIR, based upon the results of the scoping process, subject to approval by the City of Huntington Beach. As stated above, the level of required environmental documentation associated with the Specific Plan will not be known until potential impacts are identified during the planning and EIR scoping process. It is the intent of our project team to have a specific plan developed that mitigates potential identified impacts through its overall design and specific development standards. Those areas of impact that cannot be mitigated through actual Specific Plan design concepts will be addressed in detail within the EIR. EDAW will utilize knowledge of the site -specific environmental issues gained through our preparation of EIR 91-2 and past experience in preparing Initial Studies to focus the scope of the EIR. 015N116WR0P0SALD0C 1 19 0 SUBTASK 4.4 ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) Because it the desire of the City and the property owner to have a Specific Plan which allows for the development of several alternative land use scenarios, our environmental documentation will analyze the "worst case" development plan scenario which could be realized by the Specific Plan development standards and criteria. As required by CEQA, the "worst case" development scenario will be analyzed throughout the initial Study and Environmental Impact Report, however, the EIR will also evaluate several alternative land use scenarios. EDAW will prepare an Administrative Draft EIR for City staff review. Upon staff review, EDAW will incorporate all City staff comments into the Draft EIR. Once the Draft EIR is complete, EDAW will prepare the Notice of Completion (NOC) for distribution to the State Clearinghouse, public, and Responsible/Trustee Agencies. The EIR will address the full range of environmental topics required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The document will be prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended, State Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended. The following pages include brief descriptions of each section of the EIR discussing the general contents, the key issues that will be addressed and at what level of detail, and the methodology and assumptions to be used in our analyses. INTRODUCTION ' This section will describe briefly the location and general characteristics of the project, the purpose of the EIR, and the format and content of the EIR. ' SUMMARIES We will provide three (3) summaries at the beginning of the EIR. These summaries are the Executive Summary, Project Summary, and Alternatives Summary. Each summary is described below. Executive Summary EDAW will provide an Executive Summary of the EIR in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. The Executive Summary will afford the casual reader of the EIR an opportunity to understand the project and its implications. The Executive Summary will include: • Project Description (with illustrations) • Applicant, Lead Agency, Responsible Agency Data 1 0.16N 11600\PROPOSALDOC I 20 � • i • Narrative Summary Impacts, Mitigation, and Levels of Significance • Narrative Summary of Alternatives Project Summary of Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Level of Significance The second summarywill provide a tabular summary of all potential impacts of the project, P azY P P P J recommended mitigation measures, and the resulting level of significance. This summary will list the cumulative impacts of this project as well as specific project related impacts. These impacts will be called out separately so that the reader may understand the effects of both the project and other development that is occurring in surrounding areas. ' • Summary impact • Summary of Mitigation • Level of Significance Summoa of A ernatives to the Pro sed Project The third summary will provide a comparison of the impacts of all alternatives to the proposed project. The summary of alternatives will be of critical importance to the proposed project. It is intended that this alternatives summary provide decision -makers with a ready reference to the project and its alternatives. This summary in tabular format will provide the following data: • Alternative Descriptions (General) • Whether Alternative is Under Consideration ' • Whether Alternative is Superior to the Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION This section will describe the location and the characteristics of the existing, approved and proposed future development including planned urban land uses, circulation system, infrastructure improvements, phasing, and other important components of the Specific Plan. It will also identify key contacts, define the objectives of the project as proposed by the City, and list the required discretionary actions. Histo of Pro'ec ' The section will also provide a history of the approval process for the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan project. It will discuss past planning activities as they relate to the Specific Plan. This will be prepared with text, maps, charts, and graphs. Additionally, the -section will provide the 1 proper citations for past environmental documents related to the project site (i.e., EIR 91-2 and the General Plan Update EIR) and their incorporation by reference into the EIR. 0A 6N11600%PPOPOSAL.DOC 1 21 i 0� The incorporation by reference of environmental documents will be accomplished in accordance with Section 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The incorporation will include where the information is available for public review and inspection, a summary of data incorporated, and the relationship of the information to the project. It is intended that this section provide the reader with a complete knowledge of the planning content of the project. The section will also serve as a base for future analysis of the project. We will use the following procedures: 1. EDAW will discuss past planning activities as they relate to the proposed Specific Plan. ' 2. The section will provide the proper citations for past environmental documents related to the project site and their incorporation by reference into the EIR based upon information received from the City and in Subtask 1.3. 3. The incorporation by reference of environmental documents will be accomplished in accordance with Section 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The incorporation will include, where the information is available for public review and inspection, a summary of data incorporated, and the relationship of the information to the project. 4. The section will provide the reader with a complete knowledge of the planning content of the project. The section will also serve as a base for future staff analysis ' of the project. DESCRIPTION OF CITYWIDE AND REGIONAL LAND USES RELATING TO THE PROJECT Citywide - City of Huntington Beach The section will list and illustrate the location of approved and proposed projects within the City of Huntington Beach. This section will focus on the recently approved or proposed projects of a similar scale and character. Overall, the section will provide the basis for the analysis of cumulative impacts of the project in conjunction with recently approved and proposed projects. It is intended that the section provide the reader with the information necessary to understand the position of each component of the development request within its local environment. At the same time, this section will provide data necessary to understand their importance in the subregional and regional perspective. 0A 6N 116"ROPOSALDOC 1 22 i • • Regional - Orange County and Cif of Westminster The section will list and illustrate the location of approved and proposed projects within the regional area including the County of Orange and adjacent City of Westminster. This section will also focus on the past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects of a similar scale and ' character. Overall, the section will provide a further basis for the analysis of cumulative impacts of the project in conjunction with approved and proposed projects. It is intended that the section provide the reader with the information necessary to understand the position of each component of the development request within its regional environment. At the same time, this section will provide data necessary to understand their importance in the regional perspective. 1. EDAW staff will coordinate with the City to obtain a list of current projects in the City. 2. EDAW will also contact in writing the County of Orange and City of Westminster to obtain a list of projects for which applications have been filed. 3. EDAW will review the master list of projects with City staff. 4. The correspondence with the County and adjacent City will be carefully documented and included in Appendix A to the Draft EIR. This Appendix will document all public participation and review of the Draft EIR. S. The section and master list of projects will provide a further basis for the analysis of cumulative impacts of the project in conjunction with approved and proposed projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, NUTIGATION MEASURES, AND LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE ' This section (that is considered the main body of the EIR) will describe the existing environmental setting for the study area. The section will also analyze all potential impacts and recommended mitigation measures related to the project. Each impact section will discuss project -specific impacts, cumulatively significant impacts, and secondary or growth -related impacts (where applicable). EDAW will use the state CEQA Guidelines and/or local policies to establish thresholds of significance in each impact area. A full range of mitigation measures will be discussed and evaluated for feasibility and effectiveness. Following the discussion of impacts and mitigation measures, the resulting level of significance will be stated. r� I 0A 6NI I6MWROPOSAL.DOC 23 1 n 1 1 1 L] 1 1 1 P, 1 C I As identified previously in Subtasks 3.1 and 3.3, preparation of the NOP/Initial Study will determine the scope of analysis for the EIR. The following environmental topics have the potential for being addressed by the EIR unless some issues are focused out through the NOP/Initial Study or by Specific Plan development guidelines. We feel that development under a "worst -case" condition will necessitate analyzing this list of topics. These will be discussed to the level of detail necessary in the EIR. • Earth Conditions • Air Quality • Drainage and Hydrology • Natural Resources/Energy • Agriculture • Noise • Light and Glare • Land Use • Socio-economic • Transportation/Circulation • Public Services and Utilities • Aesthetics/Urban Design As stated above, each environmental topic will be addressed in the following manner: SETTING IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE Significant/Insignificant Project Cumulative Earth Conditions Issue: Although there are no active faults located on the project site and it is not within the earthquake hazard special study zone, the proposed project may have an impact on geology and soils. EDAW will utilize the existing technical report(s) to evaluate this impact. These existing reports include the 1974 Leighton Yen & Associates Citywide Geotechnical Study, the March, 1991 Camp Dresser & McKee Phase I assessment, updated soil studies completed by the applicant and as part of the City's General Plan Update. EDAW will summarize the existing report(s) and indicate whether the proposed Specific Plan will expose people or structures to geological hazards, and/or seismic hazards. EDAW has assumed that the existing reports will address major geological hazards: subsidence, expansive soils, and other potential hazards associated with geologic and soil 0A 6N 116001PROPOSAL.DOC 24 conditions such as the potential for wind or water erosion. We have assumed the existing report(s) will address major seismic hazards: fault rupture, ground shaking, liquefaction potential, and other seismic activity hazards. Since portions of the site have been farmed in the past or are currently being farmed, EDAW will summarize all Phase I assessments and evaluate the soil contamination potential associated with on -site storage of hazardous materials and use of pesticides. We will ' accomplish the following: I. Based upon the existing report(s) discussed above, EDAW will define all potential project specific and/or cumulative soils/geology impacts. 2. Specific PIan policies and requirements related to the defined soils/geology impacts will be stated. I 3. Mitigation measures proposed by the Specific Plan for the soils/geology impacts will be indicated. 4. Based upon existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements and consultant proposed mitigation measures, EDAW will define the level of significance for each project -specific and cumulative impact. Air Quality I Issue: The proposed project will have the potential to impact air quality. EDAW will conduct an air quality analysis addressing the impact of the proposed Specific Plan on ambient air quality and the exposure of people to pollutants. The study will be based upon the traffic volumes provided in the traffic study (prepared by Weston Pringle Associates) and Ievels of proposed development. The air quality study will contain both an analysis of mobile and stationary source emissions on air quality attainment planning within the air basin. The assessment will be consistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Air Quality Handbook for Preparing Environmental Impact Reports. Air quality impacts from land use may occur at two levels: regionally and locally. We will discuss if increased traffic will create area -wide vehicular emissions not currently anticipated within the regional air quality planning process. We will take the following steps: i . EDAW will conduct an air quality analysis estimating area -wide smog precursor emissions hydrocarbons and oxides and nitrogen) for the project and the alternatives. This analysis will be prepared in conformance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Air Ouality Handbook for Preparing Environmental Impact Reports. The air pollutant of most concern in Orange County is ozone. Accordingly, the analysis will place particular emphasis on emissions of reactive organic compounds (ROC) & oxides of nitrogen (NOX). 0A 6N116001PROPOSA1. DC)C ' 25 2. The local atmospheric setting will be characterized based upon available climatic data and on South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) air quality ' monitoring summaries. 3. Air emissions associated with use of the completed proposed project will be assessed using California Air Resources Board (CARB)-approved models including the Air Resources Board Model Urbemis 5 or the MAAQI model. Regional air quality impacts of the proposed project will be compared to the air standard attainment status of the individual pollutants to determine the significance of the impact of the project. 4. Stationary source emissions associated with project natural gas and electrical consumption will be estimated based upon available information provided by the ' EPA or local utility providers. These emissions will be compared to SCAQMD daily thresholds. Mitigation measures will be identified to increase the energy efficiency of the project. i5. Temporary construction impacts, including to fugitive dust emissions from roadway construction and from cut and fill operations will be evaluated. Construction emissions resulting from construction equipment, grading operations and other related aspects of the construction process will be examined. Construction equipment emissions of ROC and NOX will be quantified on a pounds -per -day and tons -per -quarter basis. Construction related emissions of ROC and NOX are not counted towards significance thresholds because the emissions are temporary. However, mitigation measures to reduce emissions of fugitive dust, ROC, and NOX will be recommended. 6. Conformity with the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMP) will be assessed as required by the Guidelines based upon the relationship of the project to countywide population projections. Discussion will be held with the SCAQMD, to determine AQMP conformity requirements to be built into the proposed project. ' 7. Along with existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements, EDAW will develop additional mitigation measures for air quality impacts. We will consult with the SCAQMD to formulate a reasonable and feasible mitigation program for the project. 8. Based upon existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements and consultant proposed mitigation measures, EDAM will define the level of significance for each project -specific and cumulative air quality impact. 1 I 0:16N116W"OPOSALDOC 1 26 Drainage and Hydrology ' Issue: The proposed project may have an affect on on -site and off -site drainage patterns. Drainage may also affect downstream water quality. This section will analyze increases in peak run-off, groundwater contamination, stormwater management and flood control improvements required to ' service the stages of development in the specific plan area based upon technical information provided by the applicant's engineer and other available sources. This section of the EIR will be prepared in consultation with the City Engineer and the County Public Works Agency to assure that the proposed on -site improvements (if necessary) will be feasible and acceptable. We will accomplish the following: 1. EDAW will describe (utilizing existing published reports) the existing on -site hydrological conditions and storm drain system. Major drainage areas, system components, discharge points, and disposal areas will be discussed. ' 2. An initial meeting will be held with the City Engineer to gain input on the preliminary drainage improvements outlined in the Specific Plan. 3. EDAW, in association with the City Engineer and the applicant's engineer, will define all potential project -specific and/or cumulative hydrological impacts including changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns and amount of surface runoff. The impact assessment will also include: modifications to surface water quantity and quality resulting from future uses, net increases in impermeable surfaces, flooding potential and downstream effects, erosion, siltation and changes to downstream water bodies, and effects related to regulation of reclaimed water ' use. 4. EDAW will state all existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements related to the defined hydrological impacts. S. EDAW, in association with the City Engineer and applicant's engineer, will develop ' additional mitigation measures for drainage/flooding impacts. 5. Based upon existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements, EDAW will define the level of significance for each project -specific and cumulative drainage impact. I OA6N1160ONPROPOSA DOC 1 27 Noise Issue: The proposed project will be impacted by vehicular noise and will add to existing noise. EDAW ' will perform an acoustical engineering analysis of the proposed project. The study will identify, describe, and evaluate noise sources and potential noise conflicts on noise -sensitive uses resulting from implementation. of the proposed Specific Plan. The potential noise impacts of the project will be divided into short-term construction noise, long-term traffic noise, impacts on surrounding land uses, and on -site land use compatibility. The Highway Noise Prediction Computer Program will be used by EDAW to perform this analysis. The model is designed to predict Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEQ noise levels generated by constant speed highway traffic. The program is based primarily on the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model. Like the FHWA model, the computer program predicts noise levels through a ' series of adjustments to a reference energy mean emission level. Such adjustments include traffic flow (speed and volume), distance, and shielding. EDAW will complete the following steps: 1. EDAW will divide the potential noise impacts of the project into short-term construction noise, long-term traffic noise, impacts on surrounding land uses, and on -site land use compatibility. 2. EDAW will use the FHWA highway noise model ("FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model," FHWARD-77-108) to describe existing noise levels in the project vicinity. Community noise standards relevant to this project are contained in the City of Huntington Beach Noise Element of the General Plan. The standards will be summarized and their relevance to the project discussed. ' 3. EDAW will determine the increase in noise levels that are caused by the project by utilizing the FHWA highway noise model in conjunction with the future project and cumulative traffic volumes from the WPA traffic study. Areas that will experience a significant noise increase will be identified and the resulting land use/noise compatibility will be discussed according to City of Huntington Beach criteria. 4. If requested by City staff, sample measurements of ambient noise will be taken by Gordon Bricken and Associates. Noise levels will be recorded at locations along roadways in the adjacent residential neighborhoods. EDAW will preliminarily identify the locations that would be most impacted by increases in roadway noise using the WPA traffic analysis. These locations will be submitted to the Community ' Development Director for review and approval. Costs associated with the measurements are provided in Section VI. 5. Along with existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies, EDAW will develop mitigation measures for noise impacts. The mitigation program will be directed towards short-term construction noise and long-term noise levels resulting from increases in traffic volumes. I OA 6N 11600\pROPOSAL.DOC 28 6. Based upon existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements, EDAW will define the level of significance for each project -specific and cumulative ' noise impact. Light and Glare ' Issue: ' The proposed project will have a potential light and glare impact. A visual analysis (including light and glare) of the proposed project will be prepared for both on and off -site surrounding areas. Light and Glare impacts of the project as they relate to Land Use will be analyzed. EDAW will accomplish the following: 1. The existing conditions of the project site and relationship to future land uses will be evaluated. 2. Nighttime lighting and glare impacts to the adjacent residential areas. 3. The proposed project will be evaluated for compliance with the goals, policies, and objectives of the City of Huntington Beach. 4. EDAW will define all potential project -specific and/or cumulative light and glare impacts. 5. Specific Plan policies and requirements related to the defined light and glare impacts will be stated. 6. Along with Specific Plan policies and requirements, EDAW will develop additional ' mitigation measures for light and glare impacts. 7. Based upon existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements and consultant proposed mitigation measures, EDAW will define the level of significance for each project -specific and cumulative light and glare impact. Natural Resources/EneM ' Issue: It is anticipated that buildout of the Specific Plan will have an impact on natural resources and energy. The future development will increase the rate of use of energy and non-renewable natural ' resources. EDAW will prepare an impact assessment related to the increased use and/or loss of natural resources. EDAW will accomplish the following: I OA W116"ROPOSALDOC 1 29 1. EDAW will describe the existing on -site non-renewable natural resources (i.e., prime farmland). Statewide statistics for construction -related minerals and ' consumption of forest products will be provided. 2. EDAW will define all potential project -specific and/or cumulative natural resource/energy impacts resulting from the buildout of the proposed project. 3. Specific Plan policies and requirements related to the defined natural resource ' impacts will be stated. 4. Along with Specific Plan policies and requirements, EDAW will develop additional mitigation measures for natural resource impacts. 5. Based upon existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements and consultant proposed mitigation measures, EDAW will define the level of significance for each project -specific and cumulative natural resource impact. ' Agriculture Issue: It is anticipated that buildout of the proposed Specific Plan will have an impact on existing on -site ' agricultural uses. EDAW will evaluate the characteristics of the existing agricultural uses on -site and prepare an impact assessment which considers the potential loss of these uses with implementation of the project. The analysis will also consider compatibility impacts which may occur during the phasing of the future development. The following will be accomplished by EDAW: 1. EDAW will collect information to describe the nature of the existing agriculture resource. The updated State Important Farmland Maps will be reviewed. Soil characteristics and suitability for agricultural use based on soil types will be described based on the USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS) for Orange County. The SCS representative for the County will be contacted to collect any needed information. 2. The historical and current agricultural use of the property will be described along with the production characteristics of the agricultural areas. This site specific information will be compared to County -wide characteristics. ' 3. The companies involved with the agricultural operations will be contacted to collect site -specific information. In addition, contact will be made with the County Agricultural Commissioner and UC Agricultural Cooperative representative for the County to collect general information on County agricultural activities. I OA GN11 WWROPOSAL DOC 1 30 ' 4. EDAW will define all potential project -specific and/or cumulative agricultural resource impacts. 5. Specific Plan policies and requirements related to the defined agricultural resource P q � impacts will be stated. 6. Along with Specific Plan policies and requirements, EDAW will develop additional ' mitigation measures for agricultural resource impacts. 7. Based upon existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements and ' consultant proposed mitigation measures, EDAW will define the level of significance for each project -specific and cumulative agricultural resource impact. tLand Use Issue: It is anticipated that the project will have a significant impact on land use. The Land Use Section will address General Plan consistency, land use compatibility including any potential land use ' conflicts with agricultural operations, and will recommend mitigation measures where appropriate. The affect of the proposed development on other land uses in the area will need to be addressed. The following steps will be taken: ' 1. EDAW will discuss the relationshipand consistency of the proposed project to all P P 1 applicable City Plans and Policies. As part of the General Plan consistency analysis, ' EDAW will prepare exhibits showing the revisions needed to the maps in the Huntington Beach General Plan. Based upon present information, the project will be analyzed for consistency with the following documents: City General Plan and City Zoning and the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan. 2. The land use section will contain a summary of a more detailed examination of consistency with the City's housing element, also to be addressed in the Socio- economic section. 3. We will include a discussion of the general land use patterns adjacent to the Specific Plan area. An existing land use map will be presented in the EIR. The existing and ' planned land rises including information from the General Plan will be described as well as development trends. Existing, approved, and proposed developments will be referenced from the "Citywide and Regional Land uses Related to the Project" ' section. The cumulative effects of existing uses, approved projects, major buildings under construction, planned projects with formal application, known projects and the proposed project will be evaluated. I OA 6W116ftpROPOSALDoc 1 31 4. We will address the Land Use Compatibility affect of the proposed development on other land uses in the area. The overall affect of the proposed project on the general ' character of the area will be evaluated. The change in land use patterns and potential impacts associated with the proposed specific plan land uses will be assessed. ' 5. EDAW will define all potential project -specific and cumulative land use impacts. b. Existing City policies and requirements related to the defined land use impacts will be stated. ' 7. Mitigation measures proposed in the Specific Plan for any land use impacts will be indicated. 8. In addition to existing City policies and requirements, and those proposed in the Specific Plan, EDAW will work with the City staff to develop additional mitigation measures for land use impacts where necessary. 9. EDAW will define the level of significance after mitigation for each project -specific and cumulative land use impact. 1 Socio-economic 1 Issue: EDAW will evaluate the potential project specific and cumulative impacts on socio-economics. A ' summary of existing and projected population, employment, and housing figures will be presented, based upon available data including 1990 census data and information available from the City's General Plan Update. The existing socio-economic attributes of the planning area will be addressed including population characteristics, housing characteristics, and the jobs/housing ratio. This information will be presented concisely in text, tables, and graphics. The impact analysis will assess direct and indirect impacts of the project population on employment conditions, population levels, ' and on the housing stock within the City. The following steps will be taken: 1. The EIR will describe the anticipated direct and secondary population, employment, and housing effects that would result from buildout of the specific plan. These projections will be evaluated for consistency with census data and the General Plan ' Update Projections and SCAG Regional Statistical Areas. 2. SCAG has job/housing balance targets for each of the planning subregions defined by SCAG. The impact of the project on meeting the job/housing target ratio for the subregion will be discussed. 3. Consistency with the goals and programs in the City's housing element will be addressed. OA 6N 116WROPOSAJ-DOC 1 32 1 • • ' 4. EDAW will define all potential project specific and/or cumulative socio-economic impacts. ' 5. Existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements related to the defined impacts will be stated. 6. EDAW will developadditional mitigation measures for identified impacts where g P ' necessary. 7. Based upon existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements, EDAW will define the Ievel of significance for each project specific and cumulative ' impact identified through the above steps. ' T3ransnortation/Circulation Lssue: ' EDAW will summarize the comprehensive transportation/circulation study prepared for the project by Weston Pringle Associates (WPA). The traffic analysis will address roadway and intersection ' impacts, internal circulation, primary and secondary access, traffic safety, etc. WPA will follow the City's Traffic Impact Assessment Preparation Guidelines and assure their study meets the Congestion Management Program (CMP) guidelines. A complete scope of their services is ' contained in Appendix C. The traffic impact analysis will consist of preparing a report that accomplishes the following: I. WPA will utilize A.M. and P.M. peak -hour counts from the Sharp Electronics traffic study as a base. WPA will conduct peak -hour counts at (5) five additional locations. WPA will obtain City of Huntington Beach Traffic Model data for ' inclusion in the study. The data would be obtained from City staff or the model traffic consultants. r� J 1 1 2. WPA will identify daily and peak -hour trips to be generated by the project. These estimates would be based upon Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates or other acceptable methodologies, given the existing McDonnell Douglas use and the potential need for specialized rates. 3. WPA will develop a geographic trip distribution pattern for the site. This pattern would based upon past studies on the site, City model information, regional land use, and circulation data. Estimated project traffic would be assigned to the street system in conformance with the distribution pattern and would also serve to meet CMP requirements. These data would be submitted to City Staff for initial comment and review. OA 6N] 16001PROPOSALDOC 33 1 ' 4. WPA will combine the project trip generation with existing volumes to simulate conditions with the project. Other area projects and traffic growth rates would be ' included as appropriate for the "project buildout" analyses. It is assumed that the analyses would be conducted in two project phases, to allow greater flexibility in development options and would provide the City with added analyses and mitigation information. ' 5. WPA will utilize Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analyses to evaluate the ability of the street system to accommodate projected demands. The required "City buildout" analyses would also be completed, which would need to consder the ' traffic issues related to the existing McDonnell Douglas site/operations/past operations. 6. WPA will review the local circulation system. Site access and on -site circulation ' would be reviewed with respect to traffic operations and safety. ' 7. The WPA analyses would include a section to address the CMP requirements. S. EDAW will state all existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and ' requirements related to traffic impacts. 9. EDAW, in conjunction with WPA, will develop mitigation measures. ' 10. Based upon existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements, and mitigation measures, EDAW will define the level of significance for each project ' specific and cumulative impact. Public Services and Utilities Issue: 1 The proposed project has the potential to have a significant impact on existing and proposed public services and utilities. EDAW will contact, in writing and over the telephone, all utility and public service agencies providing service to the proposed project. Answers will be requested, as appropriate, to document existing and planned facilities' current and planned usages, and excess capacities. The additional capacity required to meet projected needs will be described. The specific methods used to determine available capacity, calculate projected needs, and determine impacts ' will also be described in the EIR. Special attention will be paid to the ability of each utility to serve the project. EDAW will, at a minimum, contact the service/utility purveyors provided below. Once the definitive land use scenarios are known, certain service/utility purveyors may become obsolete. 1 1 0AW116WROPOSALDOC 1 34 1 • Fire Protection • Police • Schools t • Library • Parks and Recreation • Natural Gas • Electricity • Sewer/Wastewater • Water ' • Solid Waste Disposal • Medical ' • Telephone and Cable T.V. 1. Each public service will be analyzed individually for existing conditions. 1 2. The location of existing facilities and their capacity to serve the proposed project will be discussed. ' 3. Where applicable, generation factors, and resulting calculations will be provided. ' 4. EDAW will define all potential project specific and/or cumulative impacts for each service or utility. 5. Existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies related to the defined impacts will be stated. 6. Along with existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements, EDAW will develop additional. mitigation measures for public services and utilities ' impacts. 7. Based upon existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements and consultant -proposed mitigation measures, EDAW will define the level of ' significance for each project -specific and cumulative public service and utility impact. 1 Aesthetics/Urban Design Issues; The proposed project will have an impact on aesthetics and will alter the urban design character of the site. A visual analysis of the proposed project will be prepared for both on- and off -site surrounding areas. A line -of -sight analysis utilizing site photos and cross sections will also be prepared to clarify the impact discussion. The existing conditions and relationship to future land ' uses will be evaluated. Specific Plan land use densities and intensities will be utilized to determine form and mass to the maximum extent possible. OA 6N116DMPROPOSAL.DOC ' 35 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 fl 1 A visual analysis of existing conditions will be developed. A visual sensitivity diagram will be made from a photographic inventory of any significant visual corridors. The existing setting and potential impacts resulting from the buildout of the Specific Plan will be developed. This will include a discussion of the potential for visual intrusion into private yard areas of adjacent residential developments. 2. A series of photos of the sites and adjacent land uses will be provided and analyzed. Photographic perspectives will include selected key locations. Impacts will be assessed in terms of visibility of the project, alteration of the visual setting, and sensitivity of viewpoints. The change in landform, vegetative cover, and other visual characteristics will be described based upon photo's and cross sections from key viewpoints. 3. Aesthetic and urban design impacts will be assessed by EDAW. 4. The proposed project will be evaluated for compliance with the goals, policies and objectives of the City of Huntington Beach. 5. EDAW will define all potential project -specific and/or cumulative aesthetic impacts. 6. Specific Plan policies and requirements related to the defined aesthetic/urban design impacts will be stated. 7. Along with Specific Plan policies and requirements, EDAW will develop additional mitigation measures for aesthetic/urban design impacts. Specifically, the mitigation measures will address height, bulk, setback, building materials/color, and landscaping of specific planing areas. 8. Based on existing City and proposed Specific Plan policies and requirements and consultant -proposed mitigation measures, EDAW will define the level of significance for each project -specific and cumulative aesthetic impact. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT The alternative section will be prepared to meet the objectives of the CEQA Guidelines by addressing a reasonable range of alternatives to the project as proposed. The section will also be consistent with recent CEQA litigation on this topic. The Summary of Alternatives presented at the beginning of the EIR will provide a comparative analysis of each alternative in a tabular format. This summary will present the defined alternatives and their respective impacts. The Alternatives section will describe each alternative and discuss whether it has been rejected from further consideration. EDAW will evaluate alternatives that may eliminate or reduce to a level of insignificance, any significant adverse impacts associated with the project. The analysis of alternatives to the proposed project will include: two (2) No Project Alternatives (L NO Project - O:A 6N11600TROPOSAL,DOC I 36 1 9 0 fNO Development and 2. Development based on the existing zoning standards), Alternative Location Alternative, and up to three (3) other land use alternatives as determined by City staff, the applicant and the EDAW team. Each alternative will be evaluated with respect to each key impact category reviewed for the proposed project. As required by the State CEQA Guidelines, the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative and the reasons for rejecting or recommending it will be provided. The environmentally -superior alternative will be identified. If the environmentally -superior alternative is the no -project alternative, the EIR will also identify an environmentally -superior alternative among the other alternatives. During the course of environmental analysis and project review, additional land use alternatives may become apparent and warrant evaluation; these variations will be evaluated and documented, subject to receipt of written authorization from the City and at additional cost. LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT This section will analyze: Significant Irreversible Changes That Would be Involved in the Proposed Action Should It Be Implemented; and the Growth- Inducing Impacts of the Proposed Action. Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes That Would Be Involved In the Proposed Action Should It Be Implemented 41 Buildout of the Specific Plan will irreversibly commit the site to urban uses. EDAW will evaluate the impact of the project and indicate any actions that represent significant irreversible environmental changes. This will be discussed within this section of the EIR. Growth -Inducing Impacts of the Proposed Action W. A critical discussion will be that of the Growth -Inducing Impacts of the proposed action. Buildout of the Specific Plan represents a change in land use. The implementation of the project will signal the need for additional governmental services and other facilities in the community. This section will indicate the overall and site -specific, growth -inducing impacts of the project. We will discuss other vacant parcels in the vicinity of the project. The growth -inducing impacts of this project, in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects will be discussed. Potential sources of growth inducement that will be considered include substantial long- term employment opportunities, ancillary growth resulting from increased population, extensions of infrastructure, removal of impediments to growth on surrounding or nearby open space and agricultural lands, and secondary economic growth. 11 0A 6N116WROPOSAL npc �. 37 J • • 'I ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARIES EDAW will provide a series of environmental summaries in the EIR. There are several purposes of these summaries in this location. It is intended that they accomplish the following: 1. Provide an accurate transition from the Initial Study to certification documents related to the project. 2. Establish an exact cross-check related to each conclusion made in the environmental process. 3. Provide the City staff with a ready reference for environmental policies and requirements. 4. Ensure that all appropriate mitigation measures are listed in one location so they can be referenced easily as conditions of any project approval. 5. Provide a single location to prepare CEQA Findings and Facts. EDAW will provide the following listed Environmental Summaries: Summary of Applicable Standard Policies and Requirements EDAW will provide a summary of all applicable standard City policies and requirements in the EIR. These will be based upon our review of previous documents and discussions with the PIanning staff. Summary of Applicable Mitigation Measures In addition to the discussion of recommended mitigation measures within each topical section, we will provide a summary list of all proposed mitigation measures. Summary of Unavoidable Adverse Impacts of the Proposed Project EDAW will prepare a summary of all unavoidable adverse impacts of the proposed project. This summary will serve as the basis of the preparation of the Statement of Facts and Findings. 5 The inventory of unavoidable adverse impacts will include a summary of the findings of previous EIRs that are incorporated by reference. This will allow decision -makers to determine the relative impact of the project in concert with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. This concept is consistent with the most recent interpretations of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. OAN116"ROpO5AL.DOC 38 Summary of Impact Found Not to be Significant Based upon the information contained in the Initial Study and EIR, we will prepare a summary of those impacts that were determined to be insignificant or were reduced to a level of insignificance through standard City policies and requirements and/or mitigation measures. REPORT PREPARATION RESOURCES Organizations and Persons Consulted This section will be provided in accordance with the requirements of the City and State law and will ilist all individuals and agencies that were contacted using the preparation of the EIR. Preparers of and Contributors to the Report This section will also be provided in accordance with the requirements of the City and State law. It will list those individuals from EDAW, and the City of Huntington Beach, as well as technical subconsultants, who were involved in the preparation of the EIR. References This section will provide a listing of all reference material used during preparation of the EIR. All references used in the preparation of the report will be made available to the City during the official review period for the EIR. The references will be held in the office of EDAW and will be delivered to the City within twenty-four hours of request. APPENDICES The EIR will contain the following appendices bound as Volume II: Appendix A - Public Participation and Review Appendix B - Weston Pringle Associates Traffic Study Appendix C - Gordon Bricken Associates Noise Measurements (if necessary) Appendix D - EDAW Noise Modeling Appendix E - EDAW Air Modeling Work Products: • Six (6) copies of the initial administrative draft EIR for review by City staff. I 1 0A 6N] 16001PROPOSALDOC I OU SUBTASK 3.5 PREPARATION AND OPTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE DRAFT EIR AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION (NOC) EDAW will revise the draft in response to continents from the City. The scope also allows for minor revisions after a final review by the community development staff prior to printing (no new comments will be provided with this review). EDAW will complete the Notice of Completion form and deliver ten (10) copies of the EIR to the State Clearinghouse and three (3) copies to the regional clearinghouse (SCAG). If requested by City staff, EDAW will also distribute copies by certified mail to each federal, responsible, and trustee agency. If requested by City staff, copies will be mailed by EDAW to all other parties on the City -approved distribution list. Work Products: • Two (2) copies of the draft EIR revised in response to comments from City staff for review prior to printing. • Sixty-five (65) copies of the complete draft EIR. As an option, EDAW will also distribute the documents as described above. • Notice of Completion. ' • One (1) unbound reproducible original of the draft EIR. • One (1) computer copy of the draft EIR in Microsoft Word. SUBTASK 3.6 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS/FINAL EIR We will prepare Response to Comments on the draft EIR as required b the City staff. It is P P P �1 Y tY anticipated that these responses will be prepared immediately preceding the final Hearings on the project. Responses will be coordinated with the planning staff and provided in a timely manner so as to be useful to the decision -making process. Responses to comments will take two (2) forms. Responses to written comments made during the "official" 45-day public review period and responses to comments made at public hearings on the project and EIR. Based upon the comments received during the public review period, at the meetings during the review period, we will prepare revisions to the Draft EIR that will constitute the Final EIR. The following approach will be taken: U I 0A 6N 1 ] 6WROPOSAL E10C 1 40 1. EDAW will prepare a final EIR for the project in conformance with the requirements of Section 15132 of the CEQA Guidelines. The final EIR will consist of: a. Revisions to the draft EIR. b. Comment letters on the draft EIR and summaries of the comments made on the draft EIR at public hearings. C. A list of the persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the draft EIR. d. Responses to the comments. i e. Mitigation Monitoring Program. E 2. EDAW will review all written comments received on the draft EIR during the public review period and all oral comments made at public hearings with City staff to develop the general ' framework for the responses and prepare a draft of the responses to comments and final EIR for review by City staff. EDAW will prepare summaries of the comments made at the public hearings on the draft EIR. 3. Revisions will be made to the text of the draft E1R as required to make corrections and additions in response to comments. These additions and corrections will be identified through the use of bold or italicized type or other method to be approved by the Community Development Department. 4. The comment letters and responses to comments will be provided in an appendix to the Final EIR. Each continent letter will be followed by the response to that letter. The letters and responses will be grouped for ease of reference into the following categories: Federal Agencies, State Agencies, Regional Agencies, Local Agencies, Private Organizations, and Individuals. The public hearing summaries and responses will also be grouped together. 5. Responses that are within the scope of work and budget provided for consist of explanations, elaborations, or clarifications of the data contained in the draft EIR. Provisions of new analysis on issues, alternatives, or substantial project changes are not provided for in this scope and budget. Work Products: • Six (6) copies of the screencheck final EIR. 0A 6w,116=PROPOSAL.DOC 't 41 1 • • ISUBTASK 3.7 PREPARATION AND OPTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF FINAL EIR EDAW will revise the Final EIR in response to comments from City staff. If requested by City staff, EDAW will distribute the final EIR to all public agencies commenting on the EIR. One revision in response to comments is provided for in the scope of work and budget. Private organizations and individuals that commented on the Draft EIR will receive a copy of the response to their comment(s). Work Products: • Thirty-five (35) copies of the final EIR, consisting of the revised draft EIR text with an appendix containing the response to comments. If requested by the City, EDAW will distribute the Final EIR by regular mail to agencies commenting on the draft EIR and distribute response letters to private organizations and individuals commenting on the draft EIR. r • One (1) unbound reproducible copy of the final EIR. • One (1) computer copy of the final EIR in Microsoft Word. SUBTASK 3.8 MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM As requested by City staff, the EDAW Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program will be a separate stand-alone document. The Mitigation Monitoring program was developed in response to Assembly Bill (AB) 3i$o (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code), effective January 1, 1989. The Bill is one of the most significant changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) since 1972. Its purpose is to ensure that proposed mitigation measures included in environmental documentation will extend beyond the pages of the document, and are implemented to reduce or eliminate significant detrimental project -related impacts to the environment. A mnnitoring program will be specifically tailored to the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan and EIR. In general, this program will guide the project through the monitoring process through the following steps: • Determination of Roles and Responsibilities • Timing of Monitoring/Reporting Plan and Program • Identification Monitoring/Reporting Actions and Development of checklist • Assignment of Enforcement Responsibility • Designation and Assignment of Penalties OA 116WROPOSALDOC 42 The following approach roach will be taken: 1. EDAW will prepare a draft MMP concurrently with the preparation of the Final EIR and attached as an appendix to the Final EIR. The MMP will be designed to ensure compliance with adopted mitigation requirements during project implementation. In coordination with City of Huntington Beach staff, EDAW will prepare the MMP for mitigation measures that address significant impacts or are adopted as conditions of approval. 2. The program will be designed to fit into the City of Huntington Beach's existing entitlement and project review process. The MMP is proposed to include the following components: Introduction and Purpose of the Program, Roles and Responsibilities, Monitoring and Reporting Procedures, and Master Mitigation Matrix. EDAW will coordinate with City of Huntington Beach staff to refine MMP content and format, prior to preparing the draft MMP. 3_ The draft MMP will be revised to incorporate staff continents. A final MMP will be prepared after approval of the project by City Council to reflect any changes to mitigation measures made by the council. Work Products: • Draft MMP, distributed with the administrative Final EIR. • Revised Draft MMP, distributed with the final EIR. • Final MMP, prepared after approval of the project by the City Council. • One (1) reproducible copy of the final MMP. • One computer copy of the final MMP in Microsoft Word. SUBTASK 39 STATEMENT OF FINDINGS AND FACTS AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Based upon the contents of the Draft EIR and the actions of the decision -making body, EDAW will prepare a Draft Statement of Findings and Facts pursuant to Section 15091 and 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines for review by City staff. The statement will detail: Effects Determined to be Insignificant in the Initial Study and the EIR; Impacts Mitigated to a Level of Insignificance; Unavoidable Adverse Impacts; and Rejection of Alternatives. Subsequent to staff review of the Draft, EDAW will prepare a Statement of Findings and Facts for consideration by the decision - making body. As required by the State CEQA Guidelines, one of three findings must be made for each significant effect and must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The EDAW project manager will consult with the Community Development Department to review the draft findings and to finalize them. The Community Development Department may submit the findings for review by the City Attorney and transmit the City Attorney's comments to EDAW. I 0A 6NI 16WR0P0SALD0C 1 43 1 • • Section 15093 of CEQA requires the decision -maker to balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If a public agency approves a project that will have an adverse environmental effect, the agency must make a statement that lists the factors and public benefits that were considered in the decision making process. A Draft Statement of Overriding Considerations will prepared by EDAW for review by the City staff. Subsequent to staff review, a Statement of Overriding Considerations will be prepared for consideration by the decision -makers. Work Products: • Five (5) copies of the draft Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. • e 1 finalized reproducible co of the Findings and Statement of Overriding � (} P PY g g Considerations. • One computer copy of the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations in Microsoft Word. SUBTASK 3.10 PREPARATION OF NOTICE OF DETERNUNATION EDAW will prepare the Notice of Determination (NOD for the project within one day of approval of the project by the City of Huntington Beach consistent with Section 21108(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. The NOD will be submitted to the City for filing. Work Product: • One (1) copy of the NOD. I F I OA W116001PROPOSALDOC 44 TASK 4.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT/MEETINGS/HEARINGS SUBTASK 4.1 PROJECT KICK-OFF MEETING Mr. Don Smith, Ms. Jayna Morgan, and Mr. Ron Krater will attend the Project Kick-off Meeting with City staff. The purpose of this meeting is discussed in Task 1.0 of this Work Program. SUBTASK 4.2 CITY STAFF/PROJECT TEAM MEETINGS (4) Ms. Jayna Morgan and/or Mr. Ron Krater will attend three (3) staff meetings in addition to the kick-off meeting as specified in the April 17, 1996 RFP. EDAW will prepare meeting agendas and supplemental materials which include the status of work efforts and issues to be resolved. EDAW will ensure that all tasks are completed on time. EDAW will communicate between all parties including, but not limited to City staff, the applicant, and all subconsultants involved in the preparation of the Specific Plan and EIR. SUBTASK 4.3 PUBLIC WORKSHOPS (2) Ms. Jayna Morgan and Mr. Ron Krater will attend two (2) Public Workshop, as requested by the April 17, 1996 RFP. The first public workshop will occur when the NOP/Initial Study is ready to be released for public review. This meeting will function as an EIR scoping meeting. The second workshop function as a community information meeting and could occur during the draft EIR review. EDAW will provide the City's Director of Community Development two weeks' advance notice of the arranged scoping and community information meeting/workshops to allow the opportunity for attendance by City staff. All meetings will be held at the Huntington Beach City Hall unless agreed to by the City. Agendas and speakers/comment cards will be prepared for each meeting and tailored to the issues to be addressed. The project description and Initial Study will be provided and explained at the EIR scoping meeting in order to solicit input. Minutes will be prepared for each meeting and distributed to the City of Huntington Beach. SUBTASK 4.4 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS (3) Mr. Don Smith or Mr. Ron Krater will attend three (3) and Ms. Jayna Morgan will attend three (3) Planning Commission Hearings. EDAW will be prepared to make all necessary presentations to the Commission. 0A 6N11600TROPO$ALDOC 45 SUBTASK 4.5 CITY COUNCIL HEARNINGS (2) Mr. Don Smith or Mr. Ron Krater will attend two (2) and Ms. Jayna Morgan will attend two (2) City Council Hearings, EDAW will be prepared to make all necessary presentations to the City Council. Work Product: • The work products for Task 4.0 are shown in the EDAW meeting summary table. 1 l I i 0:1 bN 115001PROPOSAL.DOC 1 46 EDAW MEETING SUMMARY DON JAYNA RON SMITH MORGAN KRATER Project Kick -Off Meeting 1 1 1 Staff Meetings 3 3 Public Workshops 2 2 Planning Hearings 3 3 3 Commission City Council Hearings 2 2 2 Notes: 1) Refer to Appendix C for meeting attendance by WPA. 2) In accordance with the April 17, 1996 meeting, EDAW has budgeted to attend a maximum of five (5) Public Hearings. 3) Jayna Morgan and Ron Krater will both attend City Staff Meetings and Public Workshops if schedules permit. We have budgeted attendance at these meetings by one (1) senior staff member. 4) As indicated under Subtask 4.4 and 4.5, either Don Smith or Ron Krater will attend the required Planning Commission and City Council Hearings. 1 1 1 I 0;% 6N116t WR0P03ALD0C 47 I I 1 P 1 11 n 1 1 0A 6N 11600TROPOSALDOC IV. PROJECT PERSONNEL I 48 IIV. PROJECT PERSONNEL EDAW will assign the following senior personnel to complete the Scope of Work for the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan/EIR project. Resumes of EDAW staff are included in Appendix A. Principal -in -Charge Mr. Don Smith Project Manager Ms. Jayna Morgan Project Planner Mr. Ron Krater A brief description of EDAW personnel's background is provided below. Resumes for all EDAW staff participating on the project are included in Appendix A. Mr. Don Smith, Vice President/Principal, will serve as Principal -in -Charge. He has a broad range of experience in master planning new residential and nixed -use communities throughout Southern California, Arizona, Texas, and Europe. With more than 25 years as a planner, Mr. Smith has extensive knowledge in the various city processes related to new development. He advocates working closely with City staff to create plans that are responsive to clients, accepted by the cities, and beneficial to the surrounding community. A summary of relevant projects includes: • Rancho Santa Margarita, Rancho Santa Margarita Co. • Parts of the 80,000-acre Irvine Ranch, the Irvine Co. • Playa Vista Recreation Feasibility Study, Maguire Thomas Partners • Coto de Caza • Valencia, Newhall Land and Farming Co. • West Wing Ranch, Tally Realty Group • The Woodlands, the Woodlands Corp. Ms. Jayna Morgan, Senior Associate, will serve as the Project Manager. Ms. Morgan has over 12 years experience in environmental and land planning. Ms. Morgan has managed the preparation of over 75 CEQA and NEPA documents for a variety of projects throughout the state. Prior to joining EDAW, she was a director with the firm of STA. In this capacity, she served as project manager on numerous environmental and policy planning projects coordinating complex multi -disciplinary project teams. I 0A 6N116WROPOSAL.DOC 1 49 t • • Ms. Morgan's current responsibilities include the day-to-day management involved in the preparation of Environmental Assessments, general plans, environmental impact reports, specific plans, and land use studies. Ms. Morgan will coordinate the subconsultant team, in-house staff, and will be responsible for the management and overall preparation of the EIR and Specific Plan. Her recent representative project experience includes: • Santa Barbara Airport Industrial/Commercial Specific Plan, City of Santa Barbara � 1� ty • Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan, LEGO and City of Carlsbad a Moorpark Specific Plan #2 and EIR, City of Moorpark a Maricopa Specific Area Plan/EIR, City of Ojai • Dana Point Headlands Specific Plan EIR, City of Dana Point a Southside and Westside Specific Plan MBAs, City of Santa Paula a Deutsch Specific Plan EIR, City of Banning a Antelope Valley Landfill Expansion EIR, County of Los Angeles a McDonnell Douglas EIR 91-2, City of Huntington Beach Mr. Ron Krater, Senior Associate, will serve as the primary planner and designer for the project. f Mr. Krater has a broad range of experience in community design specific plan preparation, residential and non-residential site design, landscape architecture, and grading of sensitive sites locally, nationally, and intemationally. His recent representative project experience includes: a Hidden Creek Ranch Draft Specific Plan, Master Planning, Landscape Concept Design, and Community Themeing, City of Ventura a Newport Coast Master Plan, City of Newport Beach • Disney's Vacation Club at Newport Coast, City of Newport Beach a Desert Mountain Master Plan, City of Phoenix a Port Blakely Master Plan, Bainbridge Island, Washington. a Rancho Madera Specification and Site Design, City of Rancho Madera a Rancho Pacifica Specific Plan and Community Design, City of Rancho Pacifica a Valencia Master Plan and Site Design, City of Valencia SUBCONSULTANTS/PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS We have assembled a group of supporting technical subconsultants who have also worked on many projects of a similar nature and/or involving similar issues. Their association with EDAW has been a long and successful one. We believe that the team assembled will be able to work in a cohesive and supportive manner providing their technical analyses within budget and on time. The following is the list of subconsultants who will provide various analyses for the Specific Plan, the EIR, and related documents. The descriptions, resumes, and scopes of work are located in the appendices of this document. Langdon Wilson Architectural Planners or an architect selected by the City and applicant - Assistance with Specific Plan review and rewrite Weston Pringle Associates - Comprehensive Traffic Study Gordon Bricken & Associates - Ambient Noise Measurements (if necessary) 0A 6N116WROPOSAL.AOC 50 i 0:16N116"ROP IIAL.DOC 51 V. QUALIFICATIONS EDAW, INC. The followingprovides descriptions of related projects that EDAW has completed. References for P P P P these projects are provided in section VIE[ of this proposal.- Legal references are also provided in Section VII. Santa Barbara Airport Specific Plan City of Santa Barbara. EDAW is preparing a Specific Plan to provide the City of Santa Barbara with a comprehensive set of guidelines, development standards, and implementation programs to guide the orderly development and redevelopment of the 250-acre Specific Plan area. Although the plan area is within the City limits, it is surrounded by Goleta, the largest unincorporated community in Santa Barbara. The property and buildings within the plan area are owned and operated by the Airport. Major issues include the design of a land use plan that will retain the existing tenants where possible, allow for the reduction of non -aviation tenants from the south side of a major arterial that divides the plan area to the north side and provide for long-term economic self sufficiency for the Airport's operation, maintenance, and capital improvements. Moorpark Specific Plan #?/Environmental Impact Report and Related -Services, Citv of Moorpark. Project Manager for the preparation of a Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report for a 445-acre parcel with the City. EDAW is also responsible for the development of an opportunity and constraints analysis, alternative concept plans, and a preferred concept plan which the Specific Plan will ultimately incorporate. Major issues included circulation (i.e., future freeway alignment), site topography, and compliance with the City's Hillside Grading Ordinance, geology, hydrology, biology, and cultural resources. LEGOLAND Family Park Specific Plan Amendmen City of Carlsbad. Concept Plan and - - vt! v _- C p Specific Plan Amendment documents for a passive 128-acre family park. The overall concept for LEGOLAND Carlsbad may be described as a "park within a park." Establishing the child as the focal point, themed areas correspond to LEGO brands within attractive landscape settings. Dana Point Headlands Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report. City of Dana Point. The Environmental Impact Report analyzes the potential impacts of the development of a 121.3-acre mixed -use site within the City of Dana Point. The proposed project includes a mix of residential uses varying in density from 3.5 to 14.0 dwelling units per -acre for a maximum of 522 dwelling units on 53.5 acres of the project site, 12.8 acres of visitor/recreation commercial uses, and 55 acres of open space. Major project issues include land use, air quality, noise, traffic and circulation, aesthetics, geology, hydrology, biology, socio-economic, and cultural resources. Site constraints include development within the coastal zone on bluffs that overlook the Pacific Ocean. 0A 6NI 1600TROPOSAL.DOC 1 52 McDonnell Dougl—a§ Environmental Impact Report 91-2 City of Huntington Beach. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the potential impacts of a General Plan and Zone Change on a 62-acre site in the northern portion of the City of Huntington Beach. The site was the last major undeveloped Area in that section of Huntington Beach and was proposed to be zoned for a combination of residential and commercial uses. Buildout of the project would allow a maximum of 1,307 multi -family residential units and 109,000 square feet of general retail to be constructed. Project specific impacts include land use, earth resources, drainage, light and glare, aesthetics, noise, air quality, population/housing, transportation/circulation, natural resources, agriculture, and public services and utilities. Santa Anita Entertainment Center Specific Plan City of Arcadia. As part of a larger team, EDAW prepared a Specific Plan for the proposed 1,500,000 entertainment project. Designed to create a new exciting "town center" for Arcadia, the project linked the city's two commercial areas by using the underutilized parking of the Santa Anita Racetrack. Maricova Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report. City of_Oisi. The Specific Plan was prepared to provide the City of Ojai with a comprehensive set of guidelines, development standards, and implementation programs to guide the orderly development of the 1,100-acre Maricopa area. The project is located in the western Ojai Valley. It encompasses the western portion of the City of Ojai and the unincorporated land of Ventura County directly west of the city within the City's Sphere of Influence. Major concerns included developing a land use plan that would carry out the goals, objectives, and policies of the City of Ojai and the County of Ventura and implement changes to the City's land use, circulation, recreation, conservation, and open space elements and zoning code. An accompanying Environmental Impact Report analyzed potential impacts due to buildout of the Specific Plan. Deutsch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report City of Banning. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the potential impacts of the development of a 1,552-acre site within the City of Banning. Project characteristics included the construction of 1,684 single family units on 421 acres, 3,672 patio homes on 612 acres, 900 condominium and apartment units on 60 acres, and ' 340 senior housing/life care units on 17 acres. Additionally, 442 acres were proposed to be developed for non-residential uses to include 16 acres of institutional uses, 87 acres for parks and trails, 113 acres of road easements, 35 acres of neighborhood commercial, 21 acres of office/commercial/ industrial, and 170 acres for a golf course. Major project issues included land use, traffic and circulation, housing/population, hydrology, noise, air quality, biology, public services and utilities, and geology. East Tustin _Specific Plan, City of Tustin. EDAW prepared a land use plan and urban design guidelines for 2,000 acres of land owned by The Irvine Company and located within the City of Tustin. The land is adjacent to Interstate 5 and west of the Eastern Transportation Corridor. The land use plan envisioned 9,000 residential units, 40 acres of commercial use, an auto center, 120 acres of high intensity mixed use, schools, parks, and an 18-hole golf course. I OA 6N116"ROPOSAL.DOC 1 53 1 0 0 Disnev Vacation Ownershin Newport Coast Resort. City of Newport Beach. Overall design, vision statement and imagery for a hillside resort development that includes a 200-room inn, 450 guest villas, themed gardens, recreational amenities, grand canal, and restaurants. The project draws characteristics from an Italian Hilltown as the overall design theme. Process included developing on -site amenity package and "memory makers" tied to the architectural and landscape framework. Disney Vacation Ownership at Lake Buena Vista, Florida. Conceptual design and master plan for the 450-unit resort project incorporating an existing golf course with clubhouse, sales facilities, and recreation amenities into a Key West theme. South and West Side Specific Plan Opportunities and Constraints Documents City of Santa Paula. These documents were prepared to serve as an inventory of environmental conditions in the South and West Side Specific Plan areas. They described the existing conditions of resources in the region, then focused on the study area both narratively and graphically. The South Side Specific Plan was proposed to incorporate approximately 800 acres including the Santa Paula Airport. Major issues included transportation/circulation, biological resources, soils/agriculture, air quality, noise, light and glare, health and safety, archaeological resources, population, housing, and employment. The West Side Specific Plan was proposed to incorporate approximately 500 acres of existing agricultural land. Major issues including drainage, traffic, and land use compatibility. Antelope Valley Public Landfill Expansion Environmental Impact Repo County of Los Angeles. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the expansion of the Antelope Valley Public Landfill. The project site is located in the northeastern portion of Los Angeles County in the Antelope Valley area. The applicant requested a Conditional Use Permit that would allow for the expansion of a Class III Municipal Solid Waste disposal facility from the existing 57 acres to 132 acres. Responsibilities included data collection and analysis, environmental documentation, and the development of a Mitigation Monitoring Program. Major project issues included biology, hydrology, traffic and circulation, seismicity, air quality, noise, light and glare, land use, population, housing, public services and utilities, human health, aesthetics, recreation, and cultural resources. Centrage New Town -In -Town EIR, City of Sacramento. The Centrage New Town -In -Town EIR analyzed the development of a major mixed -use development on a 48-acre site in the City of Sacramento. The project included approximately 994,00 square feet of office space, 382,500 square feet of retail space, 900 residential units, 45,500 square feet of restaurant, 12,700 square feet of day care, a 350-room hotel, and parking for approximately 5,995 cars. Major project issues included: land use, zoning and adopted plans, housing, transportation/circulation, air quality, noise, public service and utilities, wildlife and vegetation, human health, microclimates, aesthetics, soil/geology, cultural resources, and fiscal impact. Green Valley_ Master Plan. City of Henderson. Prepared a community master plan and entitlements for 1,500 acres in Henderson, Nevada. The plan includes retail, office, industrial and residential land uses, structured around an extensive system of open space amenities. The plan addresses land use distribution and phasing, product mix and density, the new beltway alignment, golf and equestrian amenities and architectural controls. I 0A 6N11600TROPOSALDOC 1 54 1 • • 1 TECHNICAL SUBCONSULTANTS 1 1 1 1 L I 1 Related project experience for the technical subconsultants is provided as Appendices B, C and D of this proposal. O16N116"ROPOSAE.POC 1 55 1 0 0 1 IVI. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND BUDGET P 1 1 �l 1 1 r, LJ 1 1 11 1 0:16N116001PROP05AL.DOG 56 1 SUBCONSULTANTS Weston Pringle Associates' $28,200.00 Langdon Wilson or architect selected by City and applicant $5,000.00 Gordon Bricken & Associates (including optional noise measurements) a $950.00 ' Subtotal All Subconsultants (including optional noise measurements) $34,150.00 ' Subtotal All Tasks and Subconsultants (without optional) $125,940.00 Labor Contingency of 10% $12,594.00 EXPENSES Wordprocessing $3,000.00 Mileage and Travel, Delivery, Postage, Miscellaneous Supplies, In -House xerox, fax, Blueprinting, and Photo Reproduction services $3,000.00 Printing' $6,970.00 Optional Initial Study/NOP - 65 copies (S8.00 per copy/$520.00) (without initial study) ADEIR and DER - 73 copies ($50.00 per copyl$3,650.00) $7,490.00 Draft Final EIR and Final EIIt` - 41 copies ($80.00 per copy/$3,280.00) (with initial study) Findings and Overriders - 5 copies ($8.00 per copyt$40.00) Subtotal without optional initial study $12,970.00 Subtotal with optional initial study $13,490.00 TOTAL ALL TASKS INCLUDING OPTIONAL TASKS (without contingency) $145,380.00 TOTAL ALL TASKS WITHOUT OPTIONAL TASKS (Tasks 3.1 and 3.2, distribution of Draft and Final EIRs and optional ambient noise measurements at 5 locations) $138,910.00 TOTAL ALL TASKS INCLUDING OPTIONAL TASKS (Tasks 3.1 and 3.2, distribution of Draft and Final EMs and optional ambient noise measurements at 5 locations) ' and including 10% contingency $157,974.00 1 Weston Pringle budget includes a $4,000.00 fee to obtain City model runs from the City traffic model consultant. 2 Gordon Bricken & Associates optional ambient noise measurements $450.00 first location and $IZ5.00 per location (assume 5 locations). 3 Printing costs are based on the above breakdown by deliverables. Copies of draft and final documents have been combined into total numbers. 4 Assumes DEIR Technical Appendices is not reprinted with Final EIR. 0A 6N116001PROPOSALDOC 58 1 1 F, 1 J I' u �l 1 C VI. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND BUDGET PROJECT SCHEDULE EDAW is prepared to start this project immediately upon authorization by the City. We will submit all wok in accordance with the graphic project schedule outlined at the end of this section. This schedule will be defined in more detail as discussed in Task 1.0 of our Work Program. We anticipate that all work described herein related to the Specific Plan and EIR can be accomplished within 10 months. This timeframe may be shortened following discussions with City staff regarding necessary reviews. BUDGET EDAW will complete the Scope of Services for a not -to -exceed budget of $138,910.00 not including the optional tasks and contingency. EDAW prefers to bill monthly on a time and materials basis with each invoice containing a detailed description of services performed during the billing period and proof of work completed will be provided upon request of the City. The following provides an overall budget summary by task and a breakdown of printing and expense costs. The budget also includes a 10% labor contingency per the City's direction. EDAW TASK 1.0 PROJECT INITIATION TASK 2.0 DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC PLAN DOCUMENT TASK 3.0 PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS TASK 4.0 PROJECT MEETINGS/HEARINGS SUBTOTAL ALL TASKS (without optional tasks) SUBTOTAL ALL TASKS (with optional Tasks 3.1 and 3.2 and distribution of the Draft and Final EM) 0A 6N116DOTROPOSAL.00C $3,440.00 $8,500.00 $72,000.00 $8,800.00 $92,740.00 $97,740.00 1 57 11110 M � � = = M i" M M M= M Im M M M M Preliminary Project Schedule for McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan & EIR Task 1996 1997 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1.0 Project Initialization 1.1 Collect & Analyze Data 1.2 Project Schedule 1.3 Preliminary Staff/Project Strategy Meeting 2.0 Development of Specific Plan Document 2.1 Administrative Draft Specific Plan (Review & Comment) 2.2 Final Draft Specific Plan (Review & Comment) .� 2.3 Final Specific Plan 3.0 Preparation of Envrionmental Documents 3.1, 3.2 & 3.3 Initial Study/NOP 3.4 Administrative Draft EIR b b b f Y., h Ik•].n 3.5 Draft EIR/NOC r* 3.6, 3.7 & 3.11 Response to Comments/Final EIR/NOD > 3.8 Mitigation Monitoring Program 3.9 Findings & Facts/overriding Considerations 4.0 Project Management/Meetings/Hearings 4.1 Project Kick -Off Meeting � 4.2 City Staff/Project Team Meetings 41 4.3 Public Workshop 4.4 Planning Commission Hearings 4 City Council Hearings Working * Submittal Date b City Review 4 Public Review 49 Staff Meetings 0 Public Meetings/}iearings 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 OA 6N11600TROPOSALDOC • VII. REFERENCES 0. • 1 r_� 1 LJ I 1 iJ 1 H VII. REFERENCES We believe your conversations with people we have worked with will give you valuable insight into our professional capabilities. We encourage you to contact the individuals listed below. EDAW, INC. Private Companies Mr. John Jakobsen LEGO Project Manager LEGO, Inc - (619) 438-5570 Reference Project: LEGO/Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Mr. Michael Greynald Morrison Homes (818) 880-8193 Reference Project: Moorpark Specific Plan No. 2 and EIR Public Agencies Ms. Joan Kus Planning Director (and former Planning Director of the City of Ojai) City of Santa Paula (805)933-4214 Reference Projects: City of Santa Paula South and Westside Specific Plan MEA's Mr. Bill Prince Planning Director City of Ojai (805) 646-5581 Reference Projects: Maricopa Specific Plan/EIR City of Ojai MEA/General Plan Program Montgomery Oaks/Affordable Housing Project EIR 0A 6N116001PROP05AL.AOC Legal Reference Mr. Monte Widders Myers, Widders, and Gibson Legal Counsel for City of Ojai (805) 644-7188 Reference Projects: City of Ojai Projects Listed Above Mr. Ken D. Rosel Burke, Williams and Sorensen Legal Counsel for City of Dana Point (213) 236-0600 Reference Project: Dana Point Headlands EIR Mr. John Sherwood Economic Development Manager City of Dana Point (714) 248-3522 Reference Projects: Dana Point Headlands Specific Plan EIR Ritz Point Specific Plan and Expanded Initial Study Ms. Julie Osugi Associated Planner City of Huntington Beach (714) 536-5271 Reference Project: McDonnell Douglas EIR 9I-2 1 61 0 0 n 1 1 1 11 Li 1 1 OAM 116OMPROPOSALDOC VIII. AUTHORIZATION 62 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 VHL AUTHORIZATION This proposal shall constitute our firm offer to perform the work described herein under the terms and conditions described herein. This offer will remain valid for a period of 90 days. The individual in the firm of EDAW authorized to enter into this contract and negotiate amendments to this contract is: EDAW, INC. By: 1�)Vx !��M �� Don Smith, Vice President/Principal 0APROPOSAW 996MPROPAOC 63 • r. C 11 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 FEESCHEDULE EDAW's Standard Hourly Rate Schedule Effective January 1, 1996 SCHEDULE OF FEES for Professional Services Time Charges Hourly Rate Range Principals $100.00 - $175.00 Senior Associates $75.00 - $125.00 Associates $50.00 - $95.00 Professional, Administrative & Word Processing Staff $35.00 - $75.00 EDAW's hourly rate schedule is subject to adjustment in January and July of each year. Reimbursable Expenses Consultants: Cost plus 10%. Travel: Private vehicles @ $0.30 per mile. Computer: Computer -Aided Design/Drafting @ $25.00 - $35.00 per hour, depending upon the complexity of software and required peripheral equipment. Microcomputers used for CAD/D will be billed at $25.00 - $35.00 per hour based on the actual application. Microcomputers other than for CAD/D applications @ $10.00 per hour. Taxes: Any tax and/or fees imposed by a taxing authority based upon gross revenues or sales shall be reimbursable in addition to the fee stated in this contract. Other project expenses: Cost plus 10%. Such as: Printing, graphics, photography and reproduction, rental or purchase of special equipment and materials, long distance telephone, fax, special shipping or delivery, and lodging. 0.%%N 11600TR OPOS AL DOC rov, EDAW, INC. SCHEDULE OF INSURANCE Broker: Professional Practice Insurance Brokers, Inc. (415) 369-5900 ' WORKERS' COMPENSATION - CALIFORNIA Insurance Co.: American Motorists Insurance Company ' Policy Number Policy Dates Liabiliy Limits 3CW235534-04 9/l/95-9/l/96 $1,000,000 each accident $1,000,000 disease policy limit $1,000,000 disease each employee ' WORKERS' COMPENSATION - ALL OTHER STATES Insurance Co.: American Motorists Insurance Company Policy Number Policy Dates Liabili _ Limits _ 3CQ265819-02 5/l/95-5/l/96 $1,000,000 each accident $1,000,000 disease policy limit $1,000,000 disease each employee ' GENERAL LIABILITY Insurance Co.: Zurich Insurance Company ' Policy Number_ Policy Dates Liability Limits _ ' CP05181149-06 7/l/95-7/1/96 CSL $1,000,000 per occurrence CSL $2,000,000 aggregate Pers. Inj. $1,000,000 per occ. ' HIRED & NON OWNED AUTOMOBILE Insurance Co.: Zurich Insurance Company ' Policy Number Policy Dates Liabili Limits ' CP05181149-06 7/l/95-7/I/96 CSL $1,000,000 EXCESS LIABILITY (UMBRELLA FORM) ' Insurance Co.: Zurich Insurance Company Policy Number Policy Dates Liability Limits ' CU5181150-06 7/l/95-7/l/96 Single $3,000,000 occurrence Single $3,000,000 aggregate LWASTERSINSRANCE.DOC 1 PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY Insurance Co: Continental Casualty Company ' Policy Number Policy Dates Liability Limits Deductible AAE823-40-67 3/24/96-3/24/97 $1,000,000 each claim $150,000 ' $1,000,000 aggregate FOREIGN GENERAL LIABILITY ' Insurance Co: Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company Policy Number Policy Dates Liability Limits QD800051-02 7/l/95-7/1/96 CSL $1,000,000 per occurrence CSL $1,000,000 aggregate ' Pars Inj. $1,000,000 per occ. FOREIGN HIRED & NON OWNED AUTOMOBILE Insurance Co: Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company Policy Number Policy Dates Liabilily Limits ' QD800051-02 7/l/95-7/l/96 CSL $1,000,000 ' The aggregate limit is the total insurance available for claims presented within the policy for all operations. ' CSL stands for "Combined Single Limit." A 30-day notice of cancellation to the certificate holder is a standard contractual request. There ' is no additional charge for this request. However, the certificate cancellation clause must include a 10-day notice for non-payment of premium. 1 1 1 Naming the client as additional insured on the policy is also fairly standard; however there is a $50 charge per request. These are billed to the office and in turn should be billed to the client. Amending EDAW's coverage so it becomes primary for the client creates an additional $150 charge. The client can never be named as an additional insured on the professional liability policy. LAMASTERS\]NSRANCE.DOC 1 1 0 0 EDAW 1 Don Smith PrincipaVVice President Mr. Don Smith has twenty-five years experience in the Master Planning and implementation of new towns, resorts, and recreation complexes. Typically, the projects Mr. Smith is involved in are complex and progress over several years from inception to full development. This has provided him the opportunity to see several of his projects emerge from conception to realization. Some of his significant projects in Southern California include Rancho Santa Margarita, Euro, Monarch Beach, Ritz Carlton Resort, The Woodlands, Coto de Caza, and several of the Irvine Villages. Experience • Principal -in Charge for Rancho Santa Margarita, Orange County, California. Rancho ' Santa Margarita, a 5,000-acre Master Planned Community, is part of the historic Rancho Mission Viejo. The objective in planning this community was creating an efficient, cohesive, self-contained urban village within regionally significant open space. Rancho Santa Margarita has received national acclaim for innovative planning and design proven by the positive and vast public response. • Principal -in -Charge for Playa Vista, Los Angeles, California. Playa Vista is the recently selected location for "Dreamworks," the newly formed studios for Steven Speilberg. EDAW is preparing concept plans for an urban entertainment complex to complement this highly urban movie studios and residential neighborhood setting. The concept calls for creative leisure time activities for local residents as well as the region. • Principal -in -Charge of Coto de Caza, Orange County, California. Coto de Caza is a 4,000- acre guard -gated, residential, recreation community designed to function as a resort. The prime focus of the community is recreation, with two golf courses, a recreation center, The Vic Braden tennis complex, and the olympic equestrian facility. The land plan places home sites sensitively along the valley edges while reserving the valley floor and the ridgelines for open space. • Principal -in -Charge for Rancho Mission Viejo, Orange County, California. Rancho Mission Viejo is a 42,000-acre ranch located in South Orange County, California. The assignment was to define development opportunities and to consider the extension of infrastructure to capitalize on the emerging market. It was determined that Rancho Santa Margarita, Talega Valley, and Las Flores, after extensive evaluation, would be the first communities to be developed from the Rancho Mission Viejo. • Principal -in -Charge for The Irvine Ranch, Newport Beach, California. Over the past 15 years, Mr. Smith has provided planning and design services for the Irvine Company. Projects include: The Irvine Coast, Spectrum, Woodbridge Village, East Orange, Peter's Canyon, North East Irvine, Village 12, and the Irvine Business Complex. In addition to these focused areas, he conducted studios on growth controls, open space strategies, and General Plan implementation techniques. I0iPROPOSAM6Y116M M1TH.DOC ' Don Smith • Principal -in -Charge for Valencia, Santa Clarita, California. The new town of Valencia initiated development in the mid-1460s and grew strongly for approximately fifteen years. In the past fifteen years, the Newhall Land and Farming Company, developers of Valencia, have watched a dramatic decline in their market share of the Los Angeles region. Recently, Mr. Smith worked with Valencia to help them evaluate the marketplace and to re -position their development strategy in a manner that increases their market share from 1 % to 10% of the Los Angeles region. The product has been a ten-year development strategy in the form of a Master Plan for the remaining un-developed, 7,000 acres of Valencia land. Principal -in -Charge for Dou hert Valle San Ramon California. Dougherty Valle is a 'Dougherty Y> g Y Y 6,000-acre site comprised of two ranches owned by Shapell Industries and the other by Windemere Partners. The Master Plan for this property was created under the guidance of Contra Costa County as a Specific Plan. Special care was taken to assure that both the interests of the county as well as the two property owners were balanced in the preparation of the Master Plan, resulting in an excellent example of public -private collaboration. • Principal -in -Charge of The Woodlands, Houston, Texas. The Woodlands, a 25,000-acre new town, is one of the most successful new towns in the United States. Over the past fifteen years, detailed master plans for three residential villages totaling 7,000 acres have been prepared; Lake Woodlands, a 200-acre recreation lake and the Metro Center, a five million square foot mixed -use complex of retail, office, entertainment and residential. • Principal -in -Charge of Southport, West Sacramento, California. The Master Plan for this 7,000-acre area was originally developed as an outgrowth of a design competition. The framework plan developed as a result of the consensus building process that occurred ' between land developers, the City, and active residential groups. The plan creates a community structured around distinct villages and a pedestrian oriented community trail and bikeway system. • Project Manager for Monarch Beach Resort Laguna Beach California.� g g ia. This 600 acre beach front resort has at its center a Ritz Carlton Hotel and Robert Trent Jones Jr. golf course. • Principal -in -Charge for West Wing Ranch, Phoenix, AZ. EDAW is providing master planning services for this 1,310-acre project. West Wing is envisioned to be a premier community that will embody the characteristics and lifestyle of the Sonoran Desert. Conservation, stewardship, and sustainability are the fundamental principles which comprise the "vision" of West Wing. The community design will emphasize open space, regional connectivity, multi -use trails, a Village Center (general store, community recreation facility, shops, executive offices, quasi -public facilities, and an elementary school and park), resource management, destination resort, 1 S-hole golf course, and a variety of housing types and densities I 0APROPOSAL4ti6N116WSMITKDOC 1 Don Smith • Project Manager for Ventana Canyon, Tucson, Arizona. This 1,000-acre desert resort focused on a Lowes five-star hotel and two Tom Fazio designed golf courses. The spectacular setting along with the hotel and golf courses has resulted in a premier golf resort in the Western United States. • Principal -in -Charge for Euro Disneyland, Marne La Vallee, France. Euro Disneyland is a unique resort -oriented new town located 20 miles east of Paris, France. The concept Master Plan for this 4,000-acre site focuses on a resort complex highlighted by the Magic Kingdom Theme Park. Radiating from the Magic Kingdom is an intricate mix of hotels, entertainment, retail and restaurants. Surrounding the entertainment core is a complex of golf courses, residential neighborhoods, commerce park, regional shopping, and an urban mixed -use center. Education California Polytechnic Pomona, 1972 - Bachelor of Science, City Planning Fullerton Community College, 1967 - Associate Arts, Landscape Architecture 1 t I IO.IPROPOSALWN] 16.0MMITH.DOC 1 0 0 EDAW 1 I ,Jayna L. Morgan Senior Associate Ms. Jayna Morgan is an urban and environmental planner with a broad scope of experience and skills. She has been involved in public and private sector projects including commercial, and mixed -use developments, and planned communities. Her project experience includes environmental documentation, entitle processing, specific plans, and general plans. She has an expertise in and working knowledge of the planning and zoning laws and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). She is experienced in managing multi -disciplinary teams on complex projects. IExperience F1 k I 1 • Project Director for the McDonnell Douglas Environmental Impact Report 91-2, City of Huntington Beach. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the potential impacts of a General Plan and Zone Change on a 62-acre site in the northern portion of the City of Huntington Beach. The site was the last major undeveloped area in that section of Huntington Beach and was proposed to be zoned for a combination of residential and commercial uses. Buildout of the project would allow a maximum of 1,307 multi -family residential units and 109,000 square feet of general retail to be constructed. Project specific impacts include land use, earth resources, drainage, light and glare, aesthetics, noise, air quality, population/housing, transportation/circulation, natural resources, agriculture, and public services and utilities. • Project Director for the Main Pier Phase II Environmental Impact Report, City of Huntington Beach. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the development of a 6.31-acre site in downtown Huntington Beach including 140,000 square feet of commercial, retail and office uses, 320 parking spaces, and 103 residential units. In order to accomplish this development, a majority of onsite structures were proposed to be demolished. Major issues included land use compatibility/aesthetics, earth resources, historic resources, light and glare, and parking. Project Director for the Rehabilitation Block Environmental Impact Report, City of Huntington Beach. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the development of 70,726 square feet of mixed -use development on approximately three acres. The project allowed for either rehabilitation of existing structures with opportunity to add additional square footage or demolition of existing structures and rebuilding to maximum square footage allowed. Specific impacts associated with this project included land use, earth resources, light and glare, and parking. Project Director for the Main Street 100 Block EIR, City of Huntington Beach. This project involved the mixed use development of 30,525 square feet on .5 acres. The major issues included historic resources and parking. Project Director for the Parking Structure EIR-City of Huntington Beach. This project involved the preparation of an EIR for the downtown area in the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed project included a five level parking structure with 838 parking spaces and 32,073 square feet of commercial and office uses. The purpose of the parking structure was to accommodate the parking demand for retail offices for the Main Pier Phase I project and the downtown area. The key issues were the following: earth, OAPROPOSAL%N 1 { 6-001MORGANDOC 1 • L 1 1 1 11 L C r i 1 1 1 71 J 1 ,Iayna Morgan housing, historic resources, air quality, and noise. Our work efforts also include assistance in permit processing of Coastal Development Permits since these downtown projects are located within the Coastal Zone. • Director for the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan Review, City of Huntington Beach. Responsibilities included serving as an extension of City staff to review and analyze the proposed Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan. The Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan area consisted of 785 acres located in the central portion of the City. Standards proposed in the Specific Plan were more lenient than existing zoning. Specific tasks conducted included preparation of a project schedule and thorough review and analysis of the Specific Plan. • Director for the Ocean View School District/Huntington Beach City School District Boundary Realignment Study. This project involved the preparation of a school district boundary realignment study for the Ocean View and Huntington Beach City School Districts in the City of Huntington Beach. This document was prepared in response to the current School District boundary that was created prior to the planning of proposed residential developments within the Bolsa Chica Specific Plan area. The boundary was not situated logically for the future planning purposes of the proposed Bolsa Chica Specific Plan area. The purpose of the study was to propose a realignment of the Ocean View School District/Huntington Beach City School District boundary to follow a more sensible pattern within and adjacent to the future Bolsa Chica development while still distributing equitably the number of students between Districts. • Project Manager for the Santa Barbara Airport Specific Plan, City of Santa Barbara. EDAW is preparing a Specific Plan to provide the City of Santa Barbara with a comprehensive set of guidelines, development standards, and implementation programs to guide the orderly development and redevelopment of the 250-acre Specific Plan area. Although the plan area is within the City limits, it is surrounded by Goleta, the largest unincorporated community in Santa Barbara. The property and buildings within,the plan area are owned and operated by the Airport. Major issues include the design of a land use plan that will retain the existing tenants where possible; allow for the reduction of non - aviation tenants from the south side of a major arterial that divides the plan area to the north side; and provide for long-term economic self-sufficiency for the Airport's operation, maintenance, and capital improvements. • Project Manager for the Moorpark Specific Plan #2/Environmental Impact Report and Related Services, City of Moorpark. Project Manager for the preparation of a Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report for a 445-acre parcel with the City. EDAW is also responsible for the development of an opportunity and constraints analysis, alternative concept plans, and a preferred concept plan which the Specific Plan will ultimately incorporate. Major issues included circulation (i.e., future freeway alignment), site topography, and compliance with the City's Hillside Grading Ordinance, geology, hydrology, biology, and cultural resources. 0.IPROPOSAD6N l 16.00NORGANDOC IJayna Morgan • Project Director for the Dana Point Headlands Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, City of Dana Point. The Environmental Impact Report analyzes the potential impacts of the development of a 121.3-acre mixed -use site within the City of Dana Point. The proposed project includes a mix of residential uses varying in density from 3.5 to 14.0 dwelling units per -acre for a maximum of 522 dwelling units on 53.5 acres of the project site, 12.8 acres of visitor/recreation commercial uses, and 55 acres of open space. Major project issues include land use, air quality, noise, traffic and circulation, aesthetics, geology, hydrology, biology, socioeconomics, and cultural resources. Site constraints include development within the coastal zone on bluffs that overlook the Pacific Ocean. • Project Director for the Ritz Pointe Specific Plan/Environmental Assessment, City of Dana Point. Project Director for the preparation of a Specific Plan/Environmental Assessment which addressed a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Vesting Tentative Map, Site Development Permit, and Coastal Development Permit for the 152 unit residential project in the City of Dana Point. Major work efforts included interagency coordination on visual/aesthetics, recreation, and affordable housing issues. Coastal Act consistency was also addressed through the Specific Plan Permit process. • Project Manager for the LEGOLAND Family Park Specific Plan Amendment, City of Carlsbad. The LEGO Park Planning Group. Concept Plan and Specific Plan Amendment documents for a passive 128-acre family park. The overall concept for LEGOLAND Carlsbad may be described as a "park within a park." Establishing the child as the focal point, themed areas correspond to LEGO brands within attractive landscape settings. • Project Manager for the LEGOLAND Family Park EIR Review, City of Carlsbad. The LEGO Park Planning Group. This project involved a detailed review of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was prepared for the LEGOLAND Family Park Specific Plan Amendment. EDAW's review focused on the legal adequacy of the EIR with emphasis on the fairness or justification for proposed mitigation measures. The comment(s) prepared by r EDAW were subsequently incorporated into the EIR by the City's consultant. • Director for the Deutsch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, City of Beaumont. The Environmental Impact Report, which was prepared for the Deutsch Corporation, analyzed the potential effects of the development of residential and non- residential land uses on a 1,162-acre site in the City of Beaumont. Specific development on the project site included 1,968 single family units on 492 acres, 2,208 patio homes on 368 acres, and 675 condominium/apartment units on 45 acres. • Director for the Maricopa Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report, City of Ojai. The Specific Plan was prepared to provide the City of Ojai with a comprehensive set of guidelines, development standards, and implementation programs to guide the orderly development of the 1,100-acre Maricopa area. The project encompasses the western portion 1 0 TROPOSAD6N 116 00N1ORGP. DOC 1 1 1 r 1 Jayna Morgan of the City of Ojai and the unincorporated land of Ventura County directly west of the city within the City's Sphere of Influence. • Director for the Rancho Lucerne Development Plan Environmental Impact Report, County of San Bernardino. The Environmental Impact Report for the County of San Bernardino analyzes the potential impacts of the development of a 1,362-acre site in the Lucerne Valley area of San Bernardino County. The proposed project consists of the development of 4,495 dwelling units, a 30-acre mixed -use center, a 27-hole golf course with clubhouse facilities, parks and trails. Major project issues include land use, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, cultural resources, biological resources, water quality, and hydrology. • Director for the Deutsch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, City of Banning. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the potential impacts of the development of a 1,552-acre site within the City of Banning. IEducation B.A. Social Ecology/Environmental Analysis and Planning, University of California, Irvine 1985, magna cum laude. While attending University of California, Irvine, Ms. Morgan was selected to perform research at Irvine's Environmental Simulation Laboratory (ESL). Her responsibilities included running the experimental sessions of ESL, behavioral observation and monitoring of subjects, and data coding of subject's responses to various office environments. 1 IO.TROPOSAUbti 116 00NORGAN. DOC � 9 EDAW 1 'J 11 [l 1� 1 Ronald D. Krater Senior Associate Mr. Ronald Krater is a master planner/landscape architect with a wide range of experience as a project manager and designer on a wide variety of developments. Mr. Krater's experience includes master planning, community design, site planning, grading studies, urban design, design guidelines and specific plans for resort and recreational developments, residential, golf course, mixed -use and commercial projects. Experience • Project Manager and Senior Designer for West Wing Ranch, Phoenix, AZ. EDAW is providing master planning services for this 1,310-acre project. West Wing is envisioned to be a premier community that will embody the characteristics and lifestyle of the Sonoran Desert. The site is dominated by two dramatic mountain ranges which frame the development. These natural features, as well as other significant environmental resources, will be incorporated into the community plan. Conservation, stewardship, and sustainability are the fundamental principles which comprise the "vision" of West Wing. The community design will emphasize open space, regional connectivity, multi -use trails, a Village Center (general store, community recreation facility, shops, executive offices, quasi -public facilities, and an elementary school and park), resource management, destination resort, 18- hole golf course, and a variety of housing types and densities • Project Manager and Planning for Hidden Creek Ranch, a 4,300-acre master plan for a hillside residential community located in the Ventura County, CA. Process included working closely with City of Moorpark and community groups to identify issues and concerns related to the project and formulating a conceptual master plan. Proposed uses include an 18-hole championship golf course, village centers, a mixed -use community center, equestrian facilities, and a variety of housing types ranging from estate custom homes to affordable housing. Significant open space and community features also complement this development. • Project Manager for master planning and site design of all future parcels at Desert Mountain, an exclusive 8,000-acre residential/mixed-use community in Scottsdale, Arizona. The project features three Jack Nicholas golf courses along with an award winning clubhouse and eleven single-family neighborhoods. EDAW's assignment is to facilitate the development strategy for the remainder of the project, which is to include 2 additional golf courses and a variety of housing types and densities. Primary emphasis is to preserve the sensitive Sonoran Desert habitat while maximizing product value and view orientation. • Master Planning, Urban Design and Architectural studies for Shantou World Trade Centre, Shantou, China. Key elements of this high intensity multi -use project were high- rise residential, commercial, retail, office, and a world -class hotel complex focusing on a dramatic urban open space element. Approximately 20,000 housing units, support uses, and a world trade center complex create a dynamic and energetic mixed -use community. 0:IPROPOSALI6N 116.00\KRATER.DOC IRonald Krater • Master Planning, Community Design, Urban Design, Zoning Implementation and Landscape Studies for the Guangzou Race Track Centre, Guangzou, China. A high - density, mixed -use project focusing on a commercial/office complex which ties directly to a world class horse racing facility. High and medium -rise residential, recreation, community facilities, schools, and retail/commercial comprise the specific land uses. • Project Manager, Site Planner and Designer for Disney Vacation Ownership Newport Coast Resort in Orange County, California. Overall design, vision statement and imagery for a hillside resort development which includes a 200-room inn, 450 guest villas, themed gardens, recreational amenities, grand canal and restaurants. The project draws characteristics from an Italian Hilltown as the overall design theme. Process included developing on -site amenity package and memory makers tied to the architectural and landscape framework. • Project Manager and Designer for the Newport Coast Master Plan, located along the California Coastline. This 7,500-acre community includes 2 championship golf courses, recreational amenities, and a variety of housing types and densities in a hillside -oriented development. • Master Planning and Site Design for the Golf Creek and High School Villages of Valencia, Santa Clarita, California. As new portions of the community come on line, an important goal is to create definable, distinctive villages. Establishing a unique character for these 2 villages which comprise approximately 1,200 acres and includes a 27-hole championship golf course and a variety of housing types and densities. Extensive trail and open space systems are also an important part of the master plan. • Master Planningand Community Design for the DC Ranch development in Scottsdale, Y � P Arizona, an 8,300-acre residential project located in the foothills. The project includes an extensive mixed -use town centre, two 18-hole championship golf courses, luxury resort, educational and medical facilities as well as an environmentally responsive open space system. Key elements of the process were to develop a strong community theme focusing on the natural beauty and lifestyle of the Sonoran Desert. • Project Management, Master Planning, Site Planning and Design Guidelines for Port Blakely, an 1,800-acre residential community proposed on Bainbridge Island, Washington. Challenges included environmentally sensitive areas, topography, existing trees and maintaining the existing rural fabric of the island. Education B.S.D., Arizona State University 1 IOAPROPOSAU6V 116.00XKRATER.DOC n LJ z w a a d 0 m m m r m m m m m m m m m m== r oow 1 0 0 LANGDON ' WILSON ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G N T E R 1 o R S Since its founding in 1951, Lan don Wilson has been responsible for a diverse portfolio of award i include master winning projects with a construction value in excess of S10 billion. The f rms assignments nc ude planning and urban design, educational and high-tech facilities, conference centers, libraries, museums, hospitals, hotels, office buildings, sports complexes, health clubs and governmental facilities. We are now ' working on numerous assignments in the United States, Mexico, China, Thailand, Korea, Spain, France, Germany and the Middle East. Our professional talents encompass requirements programming, space planning and building evaluation, design development, graphic arts, furniture and systems selection, complete working drawings, project management and construction administration. Our architectural and interior design services are focused to meet the full range of a client's needs, with particular emphasis on budget constraints and schedule deadlines. By developing personalized business relationships, we design and deliver creative environments which fulfill these needs in today's facilities. IPartners of Langdon Wilson I ,- PA' t iN A- I v ALAI: Ni. K W' +I 0 'A[.. C. S-0 -ROEDER 1 1 1 PHILOSOPIN 0 n 1 1 1 n n We strive to understand. confirm, quantify and commit to your goals from to beginning Managing the design. technica!, bLdget and scheduling aspects of you- goals is easier simply necause we share them. We place g•eat value o our forty year nistory of siccess with clients on a great var e-y n{ projects: arge and small, at home and abroad. Every past problem solved bet,er prepares us 'or the special cna !enges and ooportuni:ies of your project. Our time tested design process succeeds because it respects your responsibilities to yoLr orca-iization for creating a-i outstanding investment. We produce alter -native solutions, evaluate their long an.c shot terr^ imp°icatio-is, their effect on cost and senedule, and make professional recommends -,fors so :hat you know you are making the rignt decision for your project Design Awards from our peers and setting new performance standards for our profession assures you of oir continued abilities to meet your special challerge. It positions our firm to cost nue to arract ne best professionals to meet your project goals. Our firm celebrates the diversity of its services, our people, our cl-orts and projects. We continue to expand our rractice on rev: and challenging projects because our sgarec know!edge and experience. and our commitment to change keeps is fresh and ingovat.ve. Langdon Wilson professionals are project leaders. We deliver siccessful projects through a comp ex process tmat includes governmental a^provals, financing sera:egies and iggovative :ecision making. We don't just meet budgets and schedules -we manage them. We understard the value of every project dollar invested, now and for tomorrow. 1 L A N E 1 O N N I_ S 0 N A R-_ h E^_ T U:1 E P L A N N N C 11 T C R C F. S I EXRERf A 0 1 1 11 h, n P 1 I 1 Koll Intema:iorai Cypress Doveloomen: of Ca iforr'a Americar Cortinepta Hyatt Interraticnal Baldwin Properties Schumacher P•incess Development International .estle Pines Land Co'mpan•. The Te'on Rancn '_or-K)eed C::rporation The Koll Company GUTSA The Koll Cornpary/Columba Savings The I,';ne Company Tie Tamitzer Comraiy Davis Develocr'ent Company The Wolfssvirkel Group, Inc. Hughes Aircra;: Com^a•i-y Becforc Properties Shel' Oil Company Prudential Insurance Company of America Amcor Igvestment Corporation Mission Viejo Comcany The S'cke s Gaup Larcas:e• Ecvncmic Ceve.can en: Corcora:ior Signal Land —ark P,wer;ies• ic. Car ran, Browne & :, many Sterling De-;elopmert Company Kline Development Company The fthaenner Cn-many Fo-d A�respace & Communicatons Co,pora-ior A.me,ican\levaca Co•po•a:ior Fist C ty Butsr, Jnc. Sun Be" Hzldires, Iic. Ca Mat Company Disney The Ybrra-her Corporation Alhuquerque Jnurnal Publishing Company Deca V Company Limited BKK Cetporaton A J. V-Vest. inc Cnevnn Land and Dev'e oc'men- Co-npary ape eting Enginee , Pensior Trus: Lang Ranch Company Baker West Properties American Cortinental Corporation SDC Development Rancor Realty Funds KI.A Mc:crs Co•rporeton Hughes A reraft Co`po•a-ic•n First In:erstm Bank Albuquerque Journal Pub ishing Cemc;any The McGreg3r Company American International Group CSC Health Se v ces New Englard Life frsurance Company Santa h',o-iica Mc-d cal Asscciaton Oov+,ney savires & Loar AsSocia:io'n Soutneas: Nnora Bank of Orfarno State Moutual Savings & Loan Association Westem Grove-s Associat:on Wicks Co,po•a:ion Emkay Development & Realty Mo-r'son-Knupsen Company Kaiser Steele S c-d o4v. Inc. Retail Clerk's Uninrll-oca' 770 Toe Charles Dunn Company The Nett:eship Compary Guer;n, Jchns:one & Gace. Inc. I-.re-ia Banc A-ver Label Cnristcpher's Wire C:ub Fi •st National Bark o= Nevaea Cal`omia Firs: BanK Wel s Fargo Bank F -st National Bark o' Arizona Sec.crty Pacifc Nat onal Bank Glendale Sav ngs & Loan Association Arizona Arizona Department of Admir'strat on Greerbrier Sr-uthwest Co•po•a_ior State M Jtual Savings & Loan .Association City of Yorba Lirda. CA City of Norwalk, CA City of On�a•io, CA C:tv of Sarta .Ana City of Hunting:oi Beach, CA City of Long Beacn, CA 1 LA'N =CON .. L S G % '.F.C-1 T.,RE FLA -J"IK _ 'N 7 =S EXPERIES • 1 17 LJ 1 1 1 The Aoki Corporation American T,adiro Real Estate Albuquerque Journal Publishing Co Ayrshire Corporation Creative Artists A•gercy Bancao Investment Group T,ie Culler StL.-iCS BCE Develcpmeq- Dis,iey Developmert Compary Bedfo,d Propert es Forc Aerospace & Comrnugication Corp. Cal 'or-iia Pacif c Properties Kia Moor Company Carlton Brawn & Compa-ly Hdg-qes Aircraft Company Cate!ILs Develcpment Company Lockheed Corporation Citicorp Asset Management Mitsuoishi Real Estate Dav"s Partners Nissho Del E. Webb Corporatio9 NL vc• Corporation Charles Dunn Company Obayashi Amm-r ca Co•pora-ior Emkay Developmert Company Pru•dert:al Real Estate Go drich & Kes' Pub is Ccunsel Gran.- Sun•ise, Inc - Shel; 0.1 Company Halferty Development Company Sony Pictures Ewerainment Hassen Development Compary S7imizu The Irvire Compary U.S. lyres- Jaco^S Developmert Compary Kim arc Lee City of Glercale, AZ Tie 01 Company City of Done, CA Ka I International City of Norwalk. CA Harry Macklowe Real Estate Co_, Inc City of Ontario, CA The McGregor Company City of Ph-en�x, AZ Magui-e Thomas Partners City of Yorba Linda, CA Metropolitan S--jctures, I9c. The J. PaL Getty Trust Missio-i Viej: Rusir•ess PmGer-ies Jun or Acgievement o= Soutierq CaJfc•rn a NexLs Development Los Angeles Coin;y The P.atkovirh Company Midnign: M-ss:o-i Reliance Development Company Newport Harbor Air Museum C.J. Segerstrom & Sons Phoenix Museum of History Shel' Western L & P, Inc Richard Nixcn ?residential Archives Sival Landmark Operating Ergine-ers Trust Funds The Street Company State cf Ar zor.a Tceley & Company Trammel Crow TSA Development Company Tutor Saliba Properties Two Trees 99 Group, Inc n :.ANG]CN 4v I L S 0 N ARChITEC'u;iE aLAN111NC I N ' E R 0AS I EXPERiES 0 jI 1 1] r� LJ Ll I� 1-J rl II 1 A'huquerque Journal Publishing Co. California Institute of Technology Compute.- Sciences Corporation Digita Equipment Corporation First Interstate Bank Operations Ford Aerospace & Commur cations Hughes A rc-aft Compary Hughes Electrc-0o:ical Systems Hughes Rader Systems Jet Propuls-on Laboratory Harry G. Steel Laboratory Keck Lahoratory Alvarado Community Hospital Greater Bake-sfielc Memorial Hospital Century West Development. Inc Richard lamer Medical Center Estelle Doheny Eye Foundation Downey Community Hospital High Dese-t Medical Center Martin Luther King Jr_ Hospital Kaiser Foundatioq Hea :n Plan Los Angeles C--unty;"USC Medical Center National Meo'cal Enterprises Dllve V e -v Ur —LA Modica, Center Henry Mayo Nevvhall Memorial Riversice Medical Coster Samaritan Health Services Sierra View Hospital Woodland H I s Medical Center Western Medical Center Veterans Administration J. Paul Getry The Hemmeter Group Hyatt International. Irc. Pripcess Hotels Interr•ational, Irc. Palmilla Assocates f rudential/Eauity Development Ramada Inrs, Inc Sheraton Corporafon California Institute of Technology Liberty School District Los Angeles Unified School District University of Southern California Deca V Ccmpany Limited Magnum S.A Palmi la Spa Assoc ates The Spots C ub Ccmaany Talla Development Company Westerg Athletic Clues Bank of America Coast Federal Savings California Canadian Bank Downey Savings & Loan Far West Financial Corporation First Interstate Bank Giendale Federal Savings & Loan Imperial Bank Mitsui Mand`acturers Bank Samura Bank Sumitomo Bank Union Bank Western Bank Wells Fargo Aetna Life Insurance Company A,Istate Insurance Company Chubb Pacif'c Indernity Group Continental Assufance Company Occidental Life Insurance Prudential Insurance Company State Compensation Insurance Fund Transamerica United Services Automobile Association L A N 3 E 0 V a I- S 0 N A=-- F I T F C"°J r F a- A N V: V 3 1 ti T E R 0 R S 1 1-1 L, 1 LJ RESUME LANGDON WILSON ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G I N T E R I O R S JACK CAMP DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL PROJECTS Jack Camp has more than 25 years of experience in city and regional planning, urban design, master planning, redevelopment, social policy planning and new town design. His specialization includes large-scale master planning and on site -specific planning and design analyses. His methods address the functional and economic criteria to deliver recommendations that are realistic and implementable. EDUCATION Califomia Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, Califomia Bachelor of Science, City and Regional Planning 1971 SELECTED PROJECTS Irvine Spectrum Irvine, Califomia • 1,200 acre master plan • 15,000,000 S.F. of office, commercial, and research and development uses Palmilla Baja California Sur, Mexico • 900 acre master planned destination seaside resort • 27-hole Jack Nicklaus signature golf course • 1,300 residential units . Tennis, spa and village commercial center Tejon Ranch Kem & Los Angeles, Califomia • 274,000 acre master plan for three potential communities City of Yorba Linda Towne Center Yorba Linda, California • Inventory of existing conditions • Master plan for the historic center redevelopment Jamboree Center Irvine, Califomia • 38 acre master plan • 2,000,000 S.F. of office and commercial uses • 500 room hotel EXPERIENCE Langdon Wilson 1977-Present Center for Planning & Research 1976-1977 Berkus Group 1974-1976 Environmental Systems, Int. 1973-1974 Neste, Brudin & Stone, Inc. 1972-1973 ORGANIZATIONS Urban Land Institute • Orange County District Council Chair • International Council Guest Lecturer University of Southern California's Lusk Center for Real Estate (USC) University of Califamia/Irvine (UCI) School of Social Ecology 1 RESUME LANGDON WILSON ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G ' INTERIOR S JACK CAMP DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL PROJECTS OTHER PROJECTS Koll Center Irvine North Irvine, California • 47 acre mixed -use master plan ' • 3,000,000 S.F. of office and commercial uses • Two 16-story office towers, three 12-story office towers • Two 4-story office buildings and health club Fox Field Industrial Corridor Lancaster, California • 8,000 acre Specific Plan including Fox Field Airport Shell Oil Properties Brea and Yorba Linda, California • 2,320 acre master planned community Otay Ranch San Diego, California ' • 23,000 acre master plan for a new community • Town centers, civic buildings, urban housing, rural estate development and a public recreational park ' Lockheed B-6 Site Burbank, California . 120-acre, multi -use business park master plan. . 1,940,000 S.F. of office uses; 360,000 S.F. of industrial uses; 650 room hotel, and 100,000 S.F. of commercial uses • Burbank Airport terminal expansion Santa Teresa Southwestern U.S. and Mexico ' • Master Plan straddling seven miles of the intemational Mexico/ U.S. border near El Paso, Texas • Industrial, manufacturing, Research and Development, ' automated assembly, warehouse and distribution uses City of Long Beach Long Beach, California • 10 block redevelopment area with historic significance • Retail marketing plan and downtown urban development conceptual plan Cap Ouest Toulouse, France • 1,000 acre mixed -use master plan • Office, commercial and industrial development for France's international high tech and aerospace community ' Pacific Park Center Aliso Viejo, California . 600 acre master plan for the central business district . Office, Research and Development, civic buildings and two neighborhood shopping centers ' RESUME LANGDON I L S 0 N 'W ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G ' I N T E R f O R 5 JACK CAMP DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL. PROJECTS 1 ' OTHER PROJECTS The City of Goodyear Goodyear, Arizona • 9,000 acre master plan • 1,000-acre mixed -use R & D complex . 8,000,000 S.F. of residential, commercial, industrial areas, schools, and health care facilities Potrero Creek Riverside, California • 9,200 acne master planned community Plhuket Island Marina Phuket, Thailand • 1,200-acre mixed -use landfill master plan for local and resort uses • Two marinas, hotels, 6,000 residential units, tourist commercial, support commercial and government offices. Ontario Civic Center Ontario, California • 11 acre master plan for downtown Civic Center . Assessment and inventory of the existing City Hall, Fire Department, Police Department and library complex City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California • New master plan for the Main Street redevelopment City of Long Beach long Beach, California . 10 block redevelopment area with historic significance Retail marketing plan and downtown urban ' development conceptual plan Koll Center Dusseldorf Dusseldorf, Germany • 39-acre site mixed -use master plan • Residential, corporate office, support retail, conference and communications center with mass transit ' Nanshan Central Business District Shenzhen, China • 300 acre high -density mixed -use master plan • Central Business district and residential developments ' Ymyco Mixed -Use Project Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam . 42 acre mixed -use master plan • Office, retail and hotel uses ' Santa Ana Zoo Santa Ana, California • Master plan for expansion of an urban zoo 1 'QUALIFICATIONS LANGDON WILSON ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G 1 INTERIORS Phoenix City Hall and Plaza Phoenix, Arizona Client: City of Phoenix A municipal office building demonstrating an understanding of design for ' public use, both in the vaulted arcade and in the outdoor plaza and gardens. Langdon Wilson provided the full spectrum of services from program review and validation through construction and move -in assistance. The process involved extensive public input and influence with a design that derived its contextual design influence from the old city hall's 1928 pueblo deco architecture. ' Ontario Civic Center Master Plan Ontario, California Client: City of Ontario Langdon Wilson's assignment for this project included the programming and planning for the redevelopment, expansion and enhancement of the Ontario's existing civic center campus. The programming was provided by a sub -consultant to the firm. The program requirements provided the criteria for an intense study of alternatives including utilization of existing building versus replacement/new construction, pedestrian and automobile circulation, and enhancement of the overall site continuity and sense of place. ' Cabrillo Marine Aquarium San Pedro, California ' Client: Department of Recreation and Parks City of Los Angeles In collaboration with the Portico Group, Langdon Wilson has recently completed a maser plan for a phased expansion to the existing facilities designed by Frank Gehry. The expansion will transform he museum to aquarium status. The firm's participation in the project included master planning, architectural concepts, community workshops and presentations. Extensive analysis of the surrounding vehicular, pedestrian and water oriented uses were included in the planing analysis. Lake Havasu City Center Lake Havasu City, Arizona ' Client: Lake Havasu City Located on a 13 acre site, this master plan developed by Langdon Wilson creates a strong identifiable municipal center. The plan is comprised of a community park, 5,000 s.f. museum, 10,000 s.f. conference center, and 928,000 s.f. city hall. The large civic plaza is designed to facilitate public QUALIFICATIONS LANGDON WILSON ARCHITECTURE 'P L A N N I N G I N T E R I O R S ' events such as art fares, municipal gatherings, and community events. In addition to the master plan, the firm's services included implementation of the transition park. Orange County Fire Department Headquarters Orange County, California Client: Orange County Fire Authority Langdon Wilson was the lead consultant for the programming, planning and master plan for the consolidation and relocation of 144,000 s.f. including administrative offices, communication center, automotive center, service center and training center. Upon completion of the programming phase, the firm is continuing to test the program through master planning studies and ' analysis for various potential sites. City of Santa Ana Community Facilitation t Santa Ana, California Client: Santa Ana Redevelopment Department Langdon Wilson has been retained to assist the City of Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency with community outreach and facilitation for community workshops involving commercial, office and residential development input to the city center/arts district. Note: Additional relevant fir and project experience Information, including detailed resumes, is included in this qualifications package under the Langdon ' Wilson tab. LANGDON WICSON REFERENCES: ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY Karen R. Peters, Facilities Manager (714) 744-0544 CITY OF PHOENIX Shery L. Sculley, Assistant City Manager (602) 262-7915 1 1 1 • � QUALIFICATIONS LANGDON WILSON ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G 1 I N T E R 1 0 R S • CITY OF RIVERSIDE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Ralph J. Megna, ' Director City of Riverside, Redevelopment Agency (909) 715-3500 Don Gee, Project Manager ' (909) 715-3512 • CITY OF LONG BEACH 1 Susan Shick, Director of Community Development (310) 570-6570 1 . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Melanie Fallon, Community Development Director (714) 536-5271 • CITY OF SANTA ANA Cindy Nelson, Director of Redevelopment (714) 647-54001 • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Ken Delino, Assistant City Manager (714) 644-3002 • CITY OF ONTARIO Byron Ely, Development Director (909) 391-2510 1 n 0 LANGDON W(LSON ARCHfTECTURE P L A N N I N G INTERIORS 1 r. 1 1 1 REDEVELOPMENT & MASTER PLANNING Selected Projects PALMILLA Los Cabos, Mexico 1000-acre Resort with Hotel, Condominiums, Golf Course, and Single Residences Client: The Koll Company CARO DEL SOL Los Cabos, Mexico 1800-acre Resort with 4 Hotels, Condominiums, Golf Courses, and Single Residences Client: The Koll Company SANTA ANA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION CENTER AREA STUDY Santa Ana, California 500-acre Redevelopment Concept Plan Client: The Koll Company RANCHO SAN CLEMENTE TOWNE CENTER Rancho San Clemente, California 140-acre Concept Plan and Design Guidelines for the Planned Town Center Client: The Tarnutzer Company MEXICAN RESORTS SAN GABRIEL VALLEY East & West Coast, Mexico CORPORATE CENTER Master plans for 7 ocean front destination West Covina, California and got( resort developments totaling 5,5W 25Q-acre Business Park MwAer Pian and acres. Design Guidelines Client: Koff International Client. Davis Development Company IRVINE SPECTRUM Irvine, California 900 acre master planned business park Client: The Irvine Company TEJON RANCH Lebec, California 165,000-acre Master Land Use Plan Client: The Tejon Ranch Company ONTARIO CIVIC CENTER Ontario, California 30-acre Civic Center Master Plan for Rehabilitation and New Construction Client: City of Ontario YORBA LINDA TOWNE CENTER Yorba Linda, California 80-acre Redevelopment Master Plan Client: City of Yorba Linda EXCELSIOR HIGH SCHOOL SITE REDEVELOPMENT Norwalk, California 40-acre Redevelopment of defunct High School Building and Site Client: City of Norwalk CORPORATE LAKES Tempe, Arizona 133-acre Multi -use Business Park Client: The Wolfswinkel Group, Inc. JAMBOREE CENTER Irvine, California 38-acre Professional Business Park Client: The Irvine Company KOLL CENTER IRVINE NORTH Irvine, California 47-acre Multi -use Business Park Client: The Koli CoJColumbia Savings KOLL CENTER SIERRA POINT Brisbane/South San Francisco, California 130-acre Professional Office Park/600 Boat Marina Client: The Koll Company POTRERO CREEK Riverside County, California 9,200-acre Master Planned Community Client: Lockheed Corporation r • • AWARDS LANGDON WILSON ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G I N T E R 1 o R S ' CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECREATION SOCIETYAWARD OF EXCELLENCE IN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE PARKS DESIGN PARK PLANNING AWARDS Pershing Square Phoenix Plaza kos Angeles, California Phoenix, Arizona CITY OF GLENDORA COMMERCIAL Phoenix City Hall DEVELOPMENT AWARD Phoenix, Arizona Glendora Courtyard Office & Industrial Patio NAIOP/ORANGE COUNTY CHAPTER ' Clendota, California PLANNING MERIT AWARD Koll Center Irvine North CITY OF PHOENIX ACCESSIBILITY AWARD Irvine, California Ironwood Library Phoenix, Arizona NAIOP/ORANGE COUNTY CHAPTER DESIGN AWARD DEVELOPMENT AWARD Koll Center Irvine North It Glendora Courtyard Office & Industrial Park Irvine, California Clendora, California L.A. BEAUTIFUL 25TH ANNIVERSARY PASADENA BEAUTIFUL DESIGN AWARDS 200 South Los Robles Building AWARDS Pasadena, California City of Hope/Lipman Graf Building Duarte, California The Commons Commercial Center Pasadena, California Downey Savings - Loan Main Branch California Operating Engineers HQ tDowney, Pasadena, California L.A. BEAUTIFUL BUSINESS & INDUSTRY AWARDS SAN JOSE FINE ARTS COMMISSION ' DESIGN AWARD Jamboree Center Irvine, California Koff Center San Jose Business Park San Jose, California ' The J. Paul Getty Museum Malibu, California TECHNOLOGY CORRIDOR ASSOC. Koll Center Newport Office Park LANDMARK BUILDING DESIGN AWARD Newport Beach, California Kaiser Medical Center Murdock Plaza Woodland Hills, California West Los Angeles, California ' UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION MODEL COLONY - BEST COMMERCIAL OUTSTANDING TENNIS FACILITY AWARD Centrelake/Centrepoint Paseo Racquet Center ' City of Ontario, California Glendale, Arizona Kline Center, Building 1 VALLEY FORWARD CRESCORDIA AWARD City of Ontario, California Phoenix City Hall Phoenix, Arizona d American -European Industrial Park A Joint Venlure of Tmnjin Economic Development Area (TEDA) and Roll China Real Estate Company ' .a ;SIN 4VENVE _ a r -' it = o \ 'r1I LANGDON WILSON ARCHITECTURE V r AN NI RG IN I ER 10 AA 1 -71;-117�--,;,I�w I ®� EK� 'IS,� E ���t' � I f4�r M�� `� ��1 7� .1. �•l,�f J.I�i; }�f ! �-._: . _ ry .�lE, Vp l N. ;l3iill�r - 3 k u�� Y x I Kc i P,iC� , •i�—'�? . a -r '�..W� �% �jh}�t �L� y ��1 _ �jt�4 •+( i,l{ �� +s) �...•,..I�Ir�M�7 j{M�]{rJ��r.�`• 1 rl�, ! ` •.�r � +' ,-.!�1{"�.J' f •��.�21� 4 _ .'il�lr h+�'� IIL W �I+}I1II �=^�'�� Lai .1'L- I l:t•n--.vrsr.�'s�u>_ I 'J f�a ti 'f + f' r —0 S5y �i}�;��'irr { I �:��,.,,,.,.� z, �, � r �r'�'4 _ � ,.r'rf ��� I � �:y{ 7 �`+ fy b � '� Y t ► - � ' . 1 1� '3 , ',.�.f�f i�iy`-�, �d �•i.iV�.Y ,I%♦ .. E: !.T-,; � \ ` X.,14'.•e � '' (1 !?r. ... N �` i � f, •- 5. �. � � r 1 I! • 1 f L• r 'rr t� y ✓ -+y /� Ht Y ,�.- - r' h � , F i _ � --tA x t � ,y� y 1{ �:.., �� ;, i ��.+ra i• �{ t1�, � � t$kctT�' � � �I 'il � `• 1 !d �: i 14��i t rl.lf F '�� ;rY� �;'�,S :Y+� lN`k #2} l� fh ��st r; EiR, 1 pu i'qf47d1 Si 'I' ,~-4`;, 1 ,,ErGG!..�...�N '�� f+Ij"�� y1:1�����4�� .'; ~. Y�.�; A; �•�t _ �* ;1`t'-�.t�i'. �i. / �i i� ( �� I � I+ !„ • � ! � I i � r. l ��i j ' V + I, • >" -t��_• ri rs * i .�. II s? i' r �� �`. � . +. '�ii''?,',' � ' 71 _ •�•... r" Fu.,'i �! .�'. I � �� 4I ��IP � }. I� ,*�.f vii�:r ' .��, ��t�� 't i� '„��.•�,•-'`--S �''•7''--•,�r'ttiJ j /"�•.. y'Ff' - '.+ y�}'' f i'�`It �•. � i I.+H I`,I '� '- � tr,.�""^'n'�iA• sr 1 � � ! , yy',L,y+q'.a y��s. a J `t � fH ! ii 4 ,:rr t(,-3:� �:(N+i ii ' —'3'�� �,,�� _•+t''' IJism 14 }}���J�,�1. Y M � (• * i ��•r � f� i! �� �`aF r •e�"` }3: 7 if::�'P,s.c 7 -E, R. Y`r'{ - k � � Et ,� ryN t i-- f•`i Y.. ! FAa A',+.J[[ �. {. _`YI• - n;,� r 1 i �w}•r•a' - •• ' rt � ••" `• r r �"�`•-2}r%Jt7j'f�'t� 1+� �'y'��jf1- r. r/; � -,k. Lti 11: -�'' •L 5`�,y�j 1� � P' ��y��' �~r I - r r3� �, � '}-f�"�.� i{y �*r'��+��j'� �'�]{ % F ' '-:,i •:--' �t ;�i V. *�i''s k�• .� L r a ,rf � 1- ill 4.., � r,l t � •ZS - i z � s. i. •.*<'i•..,�,.Y+_j. �.`'�`aa i{c ;�, ,t t { f , ° ra h}�I �.i'�..� ,{1.,gn iY �� ry,T""Ti•:: _r s•.'<, _. 3y �; 7F r n.r•4+•rtt _. + !' i� :+e3a'1 �-7i t'"'J ... x i�`a�' ru ;.s_t E if}''My: 7rti}•.��YF i1`e'� �i�� �.ar4.fz 1> t.'fd .k td uk y*~ 4- , • 0 m S E A Campus Dr. KOLL CENTER NEWPORT NEWPORT BEACH, CAUFORNIA LANGDON WILSON ■ ARCHITECTURE PLANNING • 1 4.. KOLL CENTER IRVINE NORTH MASTER PLAN IRVINE, CALIFORNIA Koll Center Irvine North (KC1N) is part of the 93-acre Koll Center Irvine complex. The master plan for the 47-acre KC1N places a hotel site at each of the three corners of the site and restaurant pads at each of the three project entries. Seven 12-story office buildings will supplement the existing four- and five -story office buildings. The development also incorporates a health club, theater complex and suppport ground floor commercial space. Adequate parking is provided onsite by three parking structures. The entire complex is linked through a series of plazas and fountain courts, which facilitates pedestrian activity both during the day and throughout the evening. LANGDON WILSON ■ ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ■ LOS ANGELES ■ NEWPORT BEACH ■ PHOENIX I 1 I 1 I [J 1 1 1 1 I CENTRELAKE ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA Centrelake is designed as a multi -use business environment for the CentreMark Investment Group. The plan is comprised of offices buildings, hotels, theaters and retaurants. The site borders the San Bernardino Freeway and is adjacent to Ontario International Airport. The 70-acre master plan establishes a main focus of mid -rise office buildings centered around a hotel. The hotel anchors a group of five restaurant sites --the Restaurant Quarter --that share a series of open-air eating courts and pedestrian walkways, which culminate in a landscaped plaza that serves as a public forecourt for the hotel. All vehicular roads lead to the Restaurant Quarter, which enjoys excellent freeway exposure. Other major sites for hotels and office buildings complete the master plan, punctuated by a series of landscaped drives, fountain courts and entry plazas. iLANGDON WILSON 0 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING a LOS ANGELES 0 NEWPORT BEACH 0 PHOENIX I I 1 F 1 1 1 1 A I i I I 1 ARDENWOOD CORPORATE COMMONS FREMONT, CALIFORNIA This 184-acre master -planned project offers a high -quality, multi -use business environment. A total of 2.6-million square feet of corporate office space, high technology facilities, and support commercial and light industrial uses are planned for the site. The design guidelines organize the building gro0p5 around a network of pedestrian walkways --the "Campus Walk", which connects all entry courts with pleasant landscaping. Plans for Phase I cover the eastern portion of the site and feature corporate office, high-tech R&D, and multi -tenant "incubator" buildings. The central portion of the site is afforded excellent freeway visibility. A 1 4-acre commercial hub containing support commercial, restaurants and financial institutions is highlighted by its adjacency to a prominent earth sculpture proposed for the Pasco Padre Parkway entry to the project. I_ANGDON wII SON ■ AKC111TI.CTUKf. PI ANNING % I05 ANGE4 ES ■ NEWPORT REACIt ■ PticifWX m ma. ■r IM M tM M*m M�� :ate, '.m gala gam rr i 071 or 9 n lir x •r.,.r n...-. r..i �%mil �� �I I�� � J.�-�..'�� �� - Q� .. � � +� w.. _.:. �o �! P� 0004 �n°�1~� o _ I ME z _- �.�U tt tt fYR'RY.fi Rom/low- Yi f/! M ilia 1Y1 •r Q Liq 3 .. x nu... a...,. Pali w .r— ■r... P.. FOX FIELD INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR LANCASTER. CALIFORNIA v ItF i f — f ,:•. 'IEEE. •:. '•'s, -� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i AppraXlMto IGCeIIm el pa 11-le eefemenl. Exact locellen of p—rune to be verlflad ane bulle.np plecemen[a to be adlaalon accOrClnply for the final all. plan celce.— prolacl 0-24 Mfry CAP O JEST 1 ILANGDON W l LSON ARCH ; T E C 1 URF FLAN NI N G I N'' E R: C F S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 wM&= UIKOUN WRSON MUMPER �i ---------------- i GOODYEAR CITY CENTER AND VICINITY CONCEPTUAL ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN R LANGDON•WFtWr4 -.MUMPE)i rl 1**� O ' i fr ©� P WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. -� A TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING April 23, 1996 Ms. Jayna Morgan EDAW, Inc. 1920 Main Street, Suite 450 Irvine, CA 92714 IDear Ms. Morgan: ' We are pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional traffic engineering services for the proposed Specific Plan (S.P.) review and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the McDonnell Centre Business Park project in the City of Huntington Beach. This proposal is based upon information provided by you, contact with City Staff, past work at the site, and our understanding of the needs of the study. We have previously met with the City Traffic Engineer to address the scope required to address the traffic issues related to the overall site. A general approach was discussed and some of the pertinent issues identified. It is anticipated that, at least, one added meeting would be required to confirm the details of the study. Our continued involvement with this site (including past traffic studies of the site for the mixed use office, the previous EII, and review of the Sharps study on behalf of McDonnell ' Douglas) should provide a desirable background for evaluating the potential traffic impacts of the current project. The "Traffic Impact Assessment Preparation Guidelines" and input from City Traffic Engineering Staff would provide the basis for the preparation of the study. The resulting study would provide technical traffic analyses, which would be incorporated into the proposed S.P. and Master EIR. The traffic evaluations would be prepared in a manner to allow the property owner the greatest flexibility of development options, as well as addressing the needs of the City of Huntington Beach. 1 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 • Laguna Hills, CA 92653 + (714) 460-0110 • FAX: (714) 460-0113 -2- In the work would include anal of traffic factors related to the planned development general, a uld a an analysis p p and also evaluation to meet Congestion Management Program (CMP) guidelines. Existing conditions would be quantified to provide a basis for the study. Estimates would be made of trips to be generated by the project and the ability of the street system to accommodate these trips evaluated on both a "project buildout" and "City buildout" basis. Consideration would also be given to other approved projects in the study area, site access, and on -site circulation provisions. The analyses would be based on the City Traffic Model data, which would be obtained from City Staff or the model consultant, depending on availability. Potential problem areas would be identified and mitigation measures recommended as may be required. A report would be prepared summarizing our findings and recommendations. We would envision the following specific tasks to be required for this study. We would assemble all available data pertinent to the study. This would include development plans, previous studies, any other area projects, street improvement plans, standard references, and similar information. Contact would be made with City Staff to obtain data and specific concerns. It is anticipated that AM and PM peak hour traffic counts from the Sharps traffic study could be utilized as a base. Additional peak hour counts at a maximum of five (5) added locations are included in this scope. City ofHuntington Beach Traffic Model data would need to be obtained for inclusion in the study. These data would be acquired from City Staff or the model traffic ' consultant. We previously obtained a proposal from the consultant (Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc.) to provide background modeling data. The details of the scope may need to be revised, but for purposes of this proposal, the approximate S4,000.00 fee for the model runs is included in this proposal. If the City can now WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Engineering Services for the S.P. Review arndEIR PROPOSAL for the McDonnell Cen&e Business Park Projed in Huntington Beach -3- Provide the needed information, may be a more desirable alternative. The Y modeling needs would depend on the final specific study requirements to be determined in conjunction with City StafE The fee would be a direct cost and the City would only be charged the amount required to obtain the model data. TASK 2 - TRIP GENERATION AND ASSIGNMENT Estimates would be made of daily and peak hour trips to be generated by the project. These estimates would be based upon Ins=ft of Transportation Engineers M) trip generation rates or other acceptable methodologies, given the existing McDonnell Douglas use and the potential need for specialized rates. Trip generation Icounts/analyses previously collected by WPA would also be referenced. jA geographic trip distribution pattern would be developed for the site. This pattern would be based upon past studies of the site, City model information, regional land use, and circulation data. Estimated project traffic would be assigned to the street system in conformance with the distribution pattern and would also serve to meet CMP requirements. These data would be submitted to City Staff for initial comment and review. TASK 3 ANAUSIS The product of Task 2 would be combined with existing volumes to simulate jconditions with the project. Other area projects and traffic growth rates would be included as appropriate for the "project buildouf' analyses. For purposes of this proposal, it is assumed that the analyses would be conducted in two project phases. This would serve to allow greater flexibility in development options as desired and would provide the City with added analyses and mitigation information. "A Traffic Engineering, Inc. Traffic Engineering Services far the &P. Review and EIR PROPOSAL for the McDonnell CoWe Bu sm= Park Projed is Xunbngton Beach Intersection Capacity Utilization C analyses would be utilized to evaluate the �P t5► (I U) y ability of the street system to accommodate projected demands. The required "City buildouV analyses would also be completed, which would need to consider the traffic issues related to the existing McDonnell Douglas siteloperations/past operations. Site access and on -site circulation would be reviewed with respect to traffic operations and safety. Potential problem areas would be identified and mitigation measures recommended as may be required. The analyses would include a section to address the CUT requirements. P� A report would be prepared summarizing our findings and recommendations. The report would contain the required supportive data and be suitable for submittal to the City of Huntington Beach. This proposal also assumes eight (8) hours of Senior Engineering time to respond to comments related to the EIR. 1 Based upon the Request for Proposal supplement, our past meetings with City Traffic for following Engineering StA and the anticipated need participation, the meetings i are included as a part of this proposal. The assumed hours required to attend the meetings include travel time. Meetings: O Meetings with City Staff - Two (2) at 3 Hours each = 6 Hours O Workshops with the Public - Two (2) at 4 Hours each = 8 Hours O Public Hearings/Study Sessions with Planning Commission - Three (3) at 4 Hours each = 12 Hours C3 City Council - Two (2) at 5 Hours each = 10 Hours TOTAL = 36 Hours O Response to Comments (EM) + 8 Hours WPA Traffic Enngineering, Ina Traffic Engineering Services for the.&P. Review and EIR PROPOSAL for the McDonnell C *e Business Park Projed in Huntington Beach -5- We would be prepared to begin work on this stud upon receipt of authorization. It is anticipated mP Y Po P that approximately five (5) to seven (7) weeks would be required to complete this study. Our fee for the work outlined in this proposal shall be based upon personnel charges plus direct expenses as indicated in our Standard Rate Schedule, a copy of which is attached and made a part hereto. In no case would the total fees exceed the maximums listed below, without prior approval from you or your representative. NOT-M EXCEED FEES: 0 Analyses / Report $19,600.00 0 Direct Modeling Costs (Others) $ 4,000.00 0 Meetings S 4.600.00 ITOTAL $28,200.00 Since it is not possible at this time to estimate the time required for additional meetings and/or presentations concerning this project, not mentioned in this proposal, our staff would be available with the fees based upon our Rate Schedule, in addition to the previously stated maximum. The additional work shall be conducted when requested by you or your representative. Invoices shall be submitted monthly for work in progress or upon completion of the work, at our option, and payable within 30 days after submission. After 60 days, unpaid invoices shall have a 1.5 percent, per month, service charge added. We shall have the option of halting work on your project when invoices are unpaid and overdue, unless mutual agreement is achieved. In the event that it is necessary for either party to incur legal expenses in connection with the performance of this contract, the prevailing party agrees to pay all court costs and attorney fees. The client agrees to limit WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc.'s liability to the client and to all contractors and subcontractors on the project, due to proven professional negligent acts, errors or omissions on WPA Trafj'ic Eng&eering, Ina TraffxEnghwering Se mkwfor the IP. Review and EIR PROPOSAL for the McDonnell Centre Business Park Plrojed in Hun ingfon Beach 1 • • -6- the part of WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc., to the aggregate sum of $25,000.00, or WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc.'s fee, whichever is greater. This proposal may be considered as effective for six months from the date of this letter. If the project is not completed within six months after the scheduled completion date (due to no fault of WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc.), additional reimbursement may be required due to increased costs. If required, such additional reimbursement would be the subject of negotiation and mutual agreement between both parties. This letter can serve as a memorandum of agreement and our authorization to proceed. Please sign one copy and return it to us for our files. We are looking forward to serving you on this most interesting project. Respectfully submitted, WPA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. aStv enS. P. . a -Sala, Senior Engineer SSS:ca IAPPROVED BY: TITLE: FIRM: DATE. WPA Traft Engb Baring, Inc. Traffic Engineering Services far the S.P. Review and EIR PROPOSAL for the McDonnell Centre Business Puck Projed in Huntington Beach WIRA 1 • • v1pift . � WP Traffic Engineering, Inc. ®i TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING 1 Effective January 1, 1995 PR FE SIONAL STAFF Firm Principal $110.00 Senior Engineer $ 95.00 Associate Engineer $ 70.00 Assistant Engineer $ 65.00 SUPPORT STAFF Engineering Draftsperson $ 65.00 Draftsperson $ 45.00 Secretary $ 25.00 ' Clerical, Field Enumerator $ 30.00 GENERAL 1) Hourly rates apply to travel in addition to work time. 2) Invoices shall be submitted monthly for work in progress or upon completion of the work, at our option, and payable within 30 days after submission. After 60 days, unpaid invoices shall have a 1.5 percent, per month, service charge added. We shall have the option of halting work on your project when invoices are unpaid and overdue, unless mutual agreement is achieved. In the event that it is necessary for either party to incur legal expenses in connection with the performance of this contract, the prevailing party agrees to pay all court costs and attorney fees. 3) Compensation for services performed wil be contingent upon the necessity of the client to receive payment from other parties. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association and judgement upon the award rendered by the arbitration may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof I 4) These rates are based upon procedures and methods outlined in the American Society of Civil Engineer's, Manual on Engineering Practice, Number 45. 1I 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 a Laguna Hills, CA 92653 & (714) 460-0110 9 FAX: (714) 460-0113 IWAI I• • ®i P ft VVPA 1 A Traffic Engineering, Inc. TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. is a consulting firm providing traffic and transportation engineering services. The firm has served both public and rprivate clients in traffic and transportation planning, operations, safety, and design. A partial listing of assignments completed by the firm is contained in the attached information. Our experience includes evaluation of traffic impacts of development; planning circulation systems for development and redevelopment; Circulation Elements of General Plans; traffic signal, striping, signing, lighting, and construction traffic control plans and specifications; accident ranalyses; parking studies; and similar assignments. Mr. Weston S. Pringle, P.E. is the Firm Principal. He has over 30 years of experience in traffic engineering and has been responsible for numerous projects. Mr. James J. Sommers is a Senior Engineer and has extensive experience in traffic operations and project management. Mr. Steven S. Sasaki is a Senior Engineer with a wide range of experience in transportation planning and project management. Resumes of their experience and background are enclosed for further information. I 1 1 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 • Laguna Hills, CA 9265 • 714 460.0110 • FAX: 714 460.0113 g 3 ( } ( ) W! • • o' P ;cam . i WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. I TM A TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING F hindpal Registered Professional Engineer, State of California, Civil and 73afIFc Engineering. ' Fellow, Institute of Transportation Engineers and Member, American Society of Civil Engineers. I7stitute. of Transportation Engineers Activities: International Director, President District 6; President Southern 'California Section; Delegate, Program Development Conference; Member, Special Publications Committee, Member, International Admissions and Transfers Committee, Senior Editor, 'Technical Notes", Member, Parking Facilities for Industrial Plants Committee; Member, Traffic Improvement Data Collection Guidelines Committee; Member, Traffic Characteristics and Considerations for Tomorrow'r Airports Committee; Member, Impact Analysis of Proposed New 'Development Committee; Member, Employment Center Parking Facilities Committee; and Member, Guidelines for Transportation ImpactAssessment ofProposed New Development Committee. Mr. Pringle has been listed in "Who's Who in Engineering"and "Who's Who in the West" Mr. Pringle has had a varied experience in both the planningand operational fields of trafflc engineering. Some of the projects with which he has been involved include: TRANSPORTATION PLANMNC - Circulation and 7}ansportation Elements of General Plans for cities; freeway location & impactstudies; access, circulation, and parkingsystems forindusbialplants, airports, centralbusiness districts, colleges, shopping centers, and other developments; traffic impact analyses for Environmental Impact Reports TRA F OPERAT N - TOPICS area wide plan studies for eleven cities, tratfc signal and traffic signal system designs; parking studies; street and parkinglotlightingdesigns; school safety programs; access, circulation, and parkingstudies for commercial, residential, and public developments Mr. Pringle has also provided traffic engFneedngservices related to litigation forhoth plaintiffand defense. This involvement has included both deposition and court testimony. Mr. Pringle has served as a Suhject Matter Expert for the California Board of Regismtion for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors in the held oftraffrc engineering. This has included the preparation and review of test questions and the evaluation of test materials. EDUCAMML QUALIFICATIONS: California State University -Fresno, Bachelor ofScience in Civil Engineering 1960; 'Certificate, Municipal Public WorksAdminishatron; Guest Lecturerm Tiansportatronand Traffic Engineering California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. From 1960, Mr. Pringle has peen Civil Engineering Assistant City of West Covina; Assistant Traffic Engineer, Traffic Engineer, and Associate Civil Engineer, City of Downey; Principal Engineer, Wilbur Smith and Associates, Consulting Engineers, Los Angeles; Tice President Lampman and Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, Pomona; Vice President Crommelln-Pringle and Associates, Inc., Placentia; and owner of Weston Pringle &Associates since 1976. 1 R GE ISTRAE N• Registered Civil Engineer No. CE 16828 IRegistered Traffic Engineer No. TR 565 1— -- - 23421 South Pointe Drive * Suite 190 • Laguna Hills, CA 92653 • (714) 460.0110 • FAX: (714) 460-0113 W*ig • • e P �ft WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. G:jL;, A. TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING STEEVEEN So SAME Senior Engineer ExPERrENCE- r. Sasakijained WPA TiaflSc Engineering InG rrr 1986as a Projectl+lanager. He has conducted and participated in numerous c impactanalyses, parldngrmpactanalyses, and tra�c safety studies Prior to joining WPA Traffic Engineering Inc, Mr. Sasaki ad appmmately free years experience as a F5•ojectManagerll'ransportalron Engineer with other Perms He has teen responsible for the preparatlorr of over 200 traffic impact/parkingstudies for projects rangingin size from large Master Plan developments to single gas station. These studies were included in EIRs, Specific Plans, General Plan Amendments, or were submitted as separate ocuments His experience also includes on -site Circulation review/design, access evaluation, public agency consulting preparation of striping plans, and utilization of computers for traflc engineering analyses Mr. Sasaki has also served as a Staff Traffic Engineering Consultant for se veraljurisdictions L Parking MCDonnell Douglas Plaza, Irvine, CA - 816, 000 SF office, retail, and residential project with a monorail to the airport Chevron Land Development; La Habra, CA -1, 065 dwelling unit residential project - Paramount Pictures, Los Angeles, CA - 500, 000 SF oBrce, movie theater, and studio tour. Pacific Drive In, Various Sites - Conversion of drive -Ins to retail centers General Plan, ElMonte, CA - Citywide circulation analyses for the updated General Plan. - Commerce Civic Center, Commerce, CA - Expansion of the existing Civic Center. - L.A. Community College Dlsb*4 Los Angeles, CA - 94, 000 SF office and parking structure 'Bailard Landfill, Ventura County, CA - Potential expansion ofeadstrng operations and CUP extension. Zone Studies, Carlsbad, CA - The City was separated into Crowth Management Zones andstudies completed for each Zone. Anaheim, CA - Numerous parking demand studies for commercial, restauran4 and retail development 'FHP, Fountain Valley, CA - Parkingsupply/demand study regardingadditronal on -site facilities NBC Studios, Burbank CA - Main access study and layout design. - Various Fast Food Studies - Trah7r, access, and panbizgewduadons for various clients, includingMcDonald's and In N Out Burger. City of La Habra, CA - Congestion ManagementPropram (CMP)/Growth Management Program (GMP) compliance assistance, traffic fee program develop=4 and general traffic engineeringservices. City of Cypress, CA - Developed a Citywide Traffic Fee through coordination with staff, majorlandowners, and City Council. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, CA - Acting City Traffic Engineer. County of Orange, CA - Annual contract consultingservices, including access and sight distance evaluations - Capistrano Unified School District CA - Retained to evaluate ten school sites on an 'as needed"basis. Watson Land Company, Los Angeles County, CA - Review of the Alameda Corridor EIR on behalf of Watson Land Company. Shawlnvesbnents, Irvine, CA - Review of the Irvine IBC EIR to evaluate the proposed fees and impacts on small business owners. - Instructor at California State University, Long Beach, CA - Traffic engineering, registra&on review class WDUCA achelor ofScience in Civil Engineering (Transportation), Iowa State University rm Ntitute of Transportation Engineers - Section Vice Presidenterican Society of Civil Engineers Orange County Traffic Engineering Council - Past Chairperson Registered Traffic Engineer (TR 1462) egistered Civil Engineer (02768) 23421 South Pointe Drive 0 Suite 190 • Laguna Hills, CA 92653 * (714) 460-0110 • FAX: (714) 460.0113 P A WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING JCS J. SOMMERS Senior ]Engineer 1 II& Sommersjotned WPA TrrtlrcEngineering Ina m 1986brmgkng with hfm a strongbac&:O ound rn &J&c signal and signal systems design experience. In addition, Mr. Sommers has managed several studies type projects He has conducted bafflc impact analyses for major developments and managed several bwvc safety studies ' From 1963 to 1970, Mr. Sommers was an EngineeringAssistant with the City of Santa Ana where he was responsible for traffic signal designs and routine balEc engineering operations. During this period, Mr. Sommers served two years in the United States Army, which included 13 months in the Republic of Viet Nam. In Yet Nam, he supervised an engineering ' design team while assigned to the 84th Consbucdon EngineenngBattalion. In 1970, Mr. Sommers entered the private engineering consultant held. Since then he has worked for several Southern ICalifornia firms, while specializing in bafc engineering. During this time, he was involved in TOPICS programs for nearly 30 agencies, in excess of 1, 000 traffic signal designs and several signal systems. He has also been in responsible charge of various OTS studies, traffic impact studies, plan checking and presentations ' TRAFFIC SIGNAL & HGAIAL MTEMDESIGN- PARTIAL BACKCMAD. Glly_ofRivcside: Areawide arterial and downtown grid systems study and plan preparation. Plans for nearly 60 signalized intersections and specifications for a central computer master were prepared. City afAnaheim: Prepared signalmodificadonplans for over200separate intersectrons, plan checking and project planning services rBancho Santa Margarita: Prepared various stages of b-a c signal improvements and area wide interconnect for the new community, involvingnearly 40 intersections. IL 1 n • Managed the Telegraph RoadRCTBktmvnnecth77provementprojec4 involving over 40 intersections i i • SR 91ILa Palma Avenue Motorist Information System. Prepared plans for fiber-optic communications, closed circuit television surveillance, and special signing for freeway bypass routing. '9FFlCAND TRANSPORTATIONSTUDIES EXPERIENCE.• Recent projects managed by Mr. Sommers are the Ifatella Avenue and Lincoln Avenue Corridor Studies, funded by the Orrice of TraSc Safetyand administered by the County of Orange Environmental ManagementAgency. The two projects evaluated nearly 30 miles ofarterial roadway and involved nine agencies. Generally, the corridor projects reviewed signing striping signals, accident history, and roadway capacity. 1EDON Pachelor ofArts Degree in Geography with a concentration on Urban and Tnwsportation Planning California State University, Fullertoir, Transportation Systems Management Certificate, University of California, Irvine. �1 1 1aI��Xl�Ca a a Institute of Transportation Engineers Orange County Traffic Engineering Council - (Chairman 1989-1990) Riverside - San Bernardino Traffic EngineenvA.ssociabon 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 9 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 a (714) 460-0110 • FAX: (714) 460-0113 0 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROJECT ENGINEER Design James J. Sommers ASSISTANT ENGINEERS Peter Keresztes Randy McFlhattan ORGANIZATION CHART WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. PROJECT MANAGER Weston S. Pringle, P.E. PROJECT ENGINEER Planning Steve S. Sasaki, P.E. TRANSPORTATION PLANNERS Heather Nix 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 0 MINO�t. ITY UTILIZATION TABLE WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. Administrative 2 Draftspersons 2 Planners - Urban 1 Transportation Engineers 1 * 3 ** TOTALS 1 0 5 3 TOTALS 1 S * 1 - Registered Civil & Traffic Engineer (California) ** 2 - Registered Civil & Traffic Engineers (California) �A WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING TRAFFIC STUDIES * ANAHEIM HILLS FESTIVAL SHOPPING CENTER, Anaheim ' * * BRINDERSON RESIDENTIAL, Orange County CAHUILLA COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES, Riverside County * CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Various Sites, Orange County * CARL'S JR., La Mirada * CATALINA PLACE, Redondo Beach * COMMUTER RAIL STATION, Covina * DIAMOND PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER, Los Angeles County * HOTEL CIRCLE, Anaheim * INDIAN RIDGE, Palm Desert ' * IN-N-OUT BURGER, Los Angeles, Placentia, Rancho Cucamonga, Ventura, Visalia, Westminster, Whittier West Covina, * L.A. COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, Los Angeles ' * LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLANS, Zones 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20 and 23, Carlsbad * MC DONALD'S, AdeIanto, Carlsbad, Monterey Park, West Covina, Yorba Linda * MC DONNELL DOUGLAS, Huntington Beach and Irvine ' * MUNSON INDUSTRIAL, Los Angeles County * ROCKWELL SITE, Newport Beach ' * SMITH'S FOOD KING CENTER, La Habra * TACO BELL, Glendora, Rancho Cucamonga * * THE ONTARIO CENTER, Ontario TRIANGLE SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER, Costa Mesa * VARIOUS ZONE STUDIES, Carlsbad * WARING PLAZA, Palm Desert * WATSON CORPORATE CENTER, Carson * WORLD RECOVERY, Recycling/Transfer Station, Montebello 1 1 23421 South Pointe Drive 9 Suite 190 • Laguna Hills, CA 92653 • 714 460.0110 • FAX: 714 460-0113 IWAI g 0 • �A 'PA Traffic Engineering, Inc. ' TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGDJEE MG ENV1RQNM.ENM IMPACT REMUS zff-EAEFO ' "O", * AREA Residential Laguna Niguel * ARROYO LA COSTA, Residential, Carlsbad * BAILARD LANDFILL, Landfill, Ventura County * CHINO CORPORATE CENTER, Office/Industrial, Chino * COMMERCE CIVIC CENTER, Civic Center Expansion, Commerce ' * CVEZA, Enterprise Zone, Coachella Valley * DAILY ROCK QUARRY, San Diego County ' * DOCTOR'S HOSPITAL, Hospital, Lakewood * HOME DEPOT, Commerce ' * NCRRA RESOURCE RECOVERY, Solid Waste Recycling, San Marcos * OLEN POINTE II, Office, Brea ' * PARAMOUNT STUDIO, Office, Los Angeles * PARKSIDE TOWNHOMES, Residential, El Segundo ' * * PICKWICK SHOPPING CENTER, Burbank RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD, Carlsbad * . * ROSSMOOR BUSINESS PARK, Commercial, Orange County SOUTHPARK, Industrial Park, Fountain Valley ' * * STADIUM BUSINESS PARK, Office/Commercial, Anaheim SUNTERRA, HoteVConvention, Indian Wells ' * * SYCAMORE CROSSING, Residential, Orange VESTAR DEVELOPMENT, Shopping Center, Paramount * VILLAGE CONCEPT, Residential, Anaheim NOTE: Recent studies have required compliance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and the Growdi Management Program (CMP - Orange County). WA Traffic Engineering, Inc. participated in the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings, which served to develop implementation guidelines for these programs in Orange County. 1 23421 South Pointe Drive a Suite 190 • Laguna Hills, CA 92653 * (714) 460-0110 9 FAX: (714) 460.0113 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W G�, 0 . 0 e P jft WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. 6 *I A TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING Rj MeTIA - - * ANAHEIM HILLS FESTIVAL SHOPPING CENTER, Anaheim * BRYAN INDUSTRIAL, Anaheim * CHARLEY BROWN'S RESTAURANT, Anaheim * EAST ANAHEIM SHOPPING CENTER, Anaheim * FHP, Fountain Valley * GOLDEN VALLEY CENTER, Alhambra * HOLIDAY INN, La Verne * HYATT HOTEL, Newport Beach * LA ENTRADA OFFICE/RESTAURANT, Escondido * MC DONNELL DOUGLAS, Lakewood * MERVYN'S, Orange County * SENIORS' RESIDENTIAL, Norwalk * SHERATON HOTEL, Newport Beach * SHERWOOD APARTMENTS, Bellflower * SMITH'S FOOD KING, Glendora * TARGET SHOPPING .CENTER, San Gabriel * THE NEST RESTAURANT, Indian Wells * VARIOUS CHURCHES, Anaheim, La Habra, Newport Beach * VARIOUS MOTELS, Anaheim 1 23421 South Pointe Drive * Suite 190 * Laguna Hills, CA 92653 * (714) 460.0110 * FAX: (714) 460-0113 W 4*! j 0 0 1� � A WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 7-7 1 - �_ �► MCI * Alhambra * Baldwin Park * Bell Gardens * Coachella * Commerce * Cypress * Downey * El Monte " Garden Grove * Indian Wells * La Quinta * La Verne * Rolling Hills * Rosemead * San Jacinto * Simi Valley * Yucaipa MASTER PLANS * CALTECH, Pasadena * CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, West Covina * CHEVRON, La Habra Hills * DOWNTOWN BREA, Brea * ESCONDIDO CIVIC CENTER, Escondido * HARBORGATE INDUSTRIAL PARK, Long Beach TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING * Azusa * Brea * Cudahy * La Habra * Placentia " HIGHWAY 60 SPECIFIC PLAN, Moreno Valley * JESS RANCH, San Bernardino County * RANCHO CARRILLO, Carlsbad * SINGH PROPERTY, Oceanside * STEVENSON RANCH, Los Angeles County 23421 South Pointe Drive 9 Suite 190 * Laguna Hills, CA 92653 9 (714) 460-0110 9 FAX: (714) 460.0113 1W A!V Plft 0 • • A WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENG1100U VG UNMRSITIES, COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS + BIOLA UNIVERSITY, La Mirada * CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Orange County * EMEK HEBREW ACADEMY, Los Angeles * LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL, La Quinta * LOS ANGELES CITY COLLEGE, Los Angeles * LOS ANGELES COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTICS, La Mirada * MIRA COSTA COLLEGE, Oceanside * WEST LOS ANGELES COLLEGE, Culver City HOSPITALS * ANAHEIM GENERAL HOSPITAL, Anaheim * ANAHEIM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Anaheim * FOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPITAL, Fountain Valley * HI DESERT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, San Bernardino County * KAISER HOSPITAL, Garden Grove * QUEEN OF THE VALLEY HOSPITAL, West Covina * SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Upland * SCRIPPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Encinitas, San Diego REYIEW OF TMFFIC IMPACTSTL!DIES ALAMEDA CORRIDOR EIR, for Watson Land Company * * DISNEYLAND EIR, for the City of Garden Grove GOLDEN EAGLE STUDY, for the City of Carson * IRVINE IBC EIR, for the IBC Small Business Owners * UNDER CONTRACT, for the County of Los Angeles * VARIOUS STUDIES, for the City of La Habra j 1 23421 South Pointe Drive * Suite 190 • Laguna Hills CA 92653 • 714 460-0110 * FAX: 714 460-0113 JWIAA. . r f WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. provides an extensive background in traffic signal and signal systems design. The combined experience of Weston S. Pringle and James J. Sommers exceeds 50 years and 2,000 individual signal improvement projects. Intersection designs range from simple pre -timed to multi -phase full actuated operation. r� Many of the design projects required interconnect and a few required systems master central units. Presently, WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. is involved with projects in Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, and Ventura Counties. We are providing contract design and plan checking services for the City of Anaheim and contract design services for the County of Orange, the County of Riverside, and the Port of Long Beach. I_ The following is a brief list of recent clients: 1) City of Anaheim Prepared traffic signal designs for over 150 intersections, including many modifications. Contact: Mr. Jim Paral (714) 254-5183. 2) City of Anaheim Prepared plans for traffic signal fiberoptic communications trunk line i, interconnect between the City's master and various major arterials; closed circuit television surveillance at several intersections; and route diversion signing for La Palma Avenue/S.R. 91 Freeway. Contact: Mr, Jim Paral (714) 254-5183. 1 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 • Laguna Hills, CA 92653 • 714 460-0110 9 FAX: 714 460-0113 f • • -2- 3) City Prepared several traffic signal improvement plans along El Camino Real and the airport and industrial areas. Cowl: Mr. Bob Johnson (619) 438-1I61. 4) Prepared several traffic signal, striping, and interconnect designs in the southeast portion of Orange County for the Rancho Santa Margarita Company and the Mission Viejo Company. Ste: Mr. Ignacio Ochoa (714) 834-3484. 5) Counly gf Los Prepared traffic signal improvement designs and system timing for Telegraph Road, involving over 40 intersections. Ste: Mr. John Hill (818) 458-5905. We presently employ Autocad Version 11 software to prepare plans. Our Assistant Engineers and their support staff are very capable and produce the highest quality plans. Preliminary designs are produced in draft format using pencil plotting techniques. Final plans are ink plottings on mylar for highest quality. Duplicate drawing files are furnished, on request, to the appropriate agency. Those concerned are encouraged to contact WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. and any of the references listed above. We would be pleased to answer questions regarding our design capabilities and to provide a sample plan, if desired. 1 1 jW1 44, g • `' WTraffic PA TraEngineering, , c Inc. TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINTEERING iWPA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, INC. PUBLIC AGENCY SERVICES CITY OF ANAHEIM - Contact: Mr. Jaynes Paral Traffic engineering services on an annual contract basis have been provided to the City of Anaheim for six years. Services have included traffic signal, �. striping, and signing designs and plan checks. In addition, plans for the installation of signs, cables, video cameras, and other equipment for IVHS projects have been prepared. PORT OF LONG BEACH - Contact: Mr. Ernest Flores An annual contract for traffic engineering services has been maintained for five years. Traffic signal, striping, and signing designs including plans, specifications, and estimates have been provided. CITY OF LA HAB Con c : Mr. Nelson Wong MTraffic engineering services to assist in the preparation of a Congestion Management Plan and a developer fee program have been provided. In addition, review of traffic and parking studies for proposed development and traffic signal design and plan check services have been provided. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DEPARTMENT QF PUBLIC WORKS - Contact: Mr. John Hill Traffic signal intersection and system plans, specifications, and estimates have been provided. WPATrafTic Engincering, Inc. currently has an on -call contract for traffic design services and for traffic impact analyses. i 1 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 • Laguna Hill CA 9265 714 4 -01 • FAX g s, 3 ( } 60 10 . {714} 460-0113 X&M OF O r I 1 I 1 I � IiF P id�b WPA Traffic Engineering, In c. to t 1 1 1 1 I 1-1 1 i 'N 1) Mr. John Lower Traffic Engineering City of Anaheim P.O. Box 3222 Anaheim, CA 92803 (714) 254-5183 2) Mr. Richard Edmonston Traffic Engineering City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92659 (714) 644-3344 3) Ms. Pat Temple Environmental Coordinator City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92659 (714) 644-3225 4) Mr. Nelson Wong Traffic Engineer City of La Habra P.O. Box 337 La Habra, CA 90633-0337 (310) 905-9722 5) Mr. Art Rangel Director of Community Dev. City of Downey 11111 Brookshire Avenue Downey, CA 90241-0607 (310) 869-7331 TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGWERING Proiects JACIUdWe Circulation Plan for Anaheim Hills; traffic signal designs; and various traffic impact analyses. jncludedt Traffic impact studies, including analyses of future traffic needs and development of circulation improvement recommendations; and traffic signal designs. • Traffic impact analyses for Environmental Impact Reports. • Traffic impact analyses; signal designs; CMP/GMP assistance; and City traffic engineering assistance. • Traffic impact analyses and Circulation Element preparation. 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 9 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 • (714 460-0110 • FAX: 14) 460-0113 g } (7 i 1> 1 1 1* 0 REFERENCES Recent Proiects WATSON CORPORATE CENTER Carson - Watson Land Company References: Jerry Weeks, Vice President (310) 952-6429. 2) McDONNELL CENTRE, Huntington Beach - McDonnell Douglas Realty References: Merle Pautsch, Client (310) 627-3082. Bruce Gilmer, City Traffic Engineer (714) 536-5525. 3) RANCHO LAS FLORES Hesperia - Rancho Las Flores Limited Partnership References: Cliff Hood, Client (714) 248-2300. . 4) PACIFIC THEATRES DEVELOPMENTS Various Locations - Pacific Theatres Refe ences: Terry Dickens, Client (310) 855-8473. I 9 0 I 1 1 1 1 i 1 I t 'd CPS Santa Margarita Company McDorinell Douglas Realty Co. McDoriald's Corporation Magteec Investment Company Diversified Shopping Centers The Taubman Company, Inc. Elfend & Associates Dale Poe Development Corp. Carver Management Corp. Moss & Company Catellus Uniornivide, Inc. Morse Consulting Group The William Lyon Company Olen Properties J.L. Webb Planning, Inc. Howard F. Thompson Associates Willdati Associates The Planning Center Crossroads Development Cypress Homes Marketplace Properties Ultrasystems Mid -State Engineers Project Design Consultants Randolph Hlubik Associates Sudberry Properties, Inc. Ladwig Design Grou ,Inc. Burnett-Ehline Development S & S Construction Company City of Alhambra City of Anaheim City of Baldwin Park City of Bell Gardens City of Commerce City of Cypress City of Downey City of El Monte Los Angeles County Orange County _ r, The Ontario Center Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc. Sanborn Webb, Inc. DSL Service Company Dickerson & Associates Hughes Investments R.J. Development Williamson & Schmid Pacific Theaters Greer Engineering In-N-Out Burgers George M. Raymond Company Williams-Kuebelbeck & Assoc. Rick Engineering The Irvine Company Mission Viejo Company Grbavac & Prkacin Concordia Homes Fluor Daniel, Inc. M.J. Brock & Sons, Inc. SHEA Homes D&D Development OTT Engineering, Inc. The Decurion Corporation Century West Development Pardee Construction Company McBride Development Co., Inc. Murphy Architects Hughes Supermarkets Friedman Homes The Fieldstone Company C'ITIES/COUNTIES City of Garden Grove City of Indian Wells City of Laguna Hills City of La Habra City of La Puente City of La Quinta City of La Verne City of Newport Beach Riverside County Ventura County Environmental Perspectives Lincoln Property Co., Inc. Fieldstone-LaCosuLkwodates Dalcin Cummins Associates Watson Land Company Kaufman Development Co. David Evans & Associates PresieyofSouthern California P & D Technologies Maza Stone Ranchos, Inc. JHK & Associates The KTGY Group, Inc. JHH Consultants Urban Communities Castaneda & Associates Culbertson, Adams & Assoc. CDC Engineering Tait & Associates 'Varner Engineering RKA Kaufman & Broad Munson Properties Edwards & Kelcey, Inc. The Klein Group Hillman Properties West Hunsaker & Associates Chevron Oil Field Research Chevron Land & Develop. Co. J.P. Kapp & Associates Tomislav Gabric & Associates Pfeifer & Associates City of Oceanside City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Redondo Beach City of Rosemead City of San Jacinto City of Simi Valley City of Ventura City of Yucaipa Port of Long Beach iI 0 1 1 1 L 96/190 GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS April 23, 1996 MS. JAYNA MORGAN EDAW 1920 Main Street, Suite 450 Irvine, California 92714 SUBJECT: PRQPOSAL FOR AQQUSTICAi ENGINEERING SERVICES MCDONNELL DO GLAS EIR CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Dear Ms. Morgan: We are pleased to submit the attached proposal for acoustical engineering services. Thank you, and we look forward to the opportunity of working with you. Prepared by: Christop er Jean Staff Engineer /mmb Attachment: Proposal 96/190 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K - Santa Ana, .California 92705.8518 Phone (714) $35-0249 a FAX (714) 835-1957 1 96/190 GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS P R O P O S A L A C O U S T I C A L E N G I N E E R I N G S E R V I C E S 2 4 H O U R N O I S E M E A S U R E M E N T M c D 0 N N E L L D OU G L A S E I R C x T Y O F H U N T I N G T O N B E A C H 1.0 SCOPE-OF-WQRK 1.1 Visit the site and identify a 24 hour measurement position. 1.2 Commence the automatic 24 hour measurement process. 1.3 Return to the site and retrieve the measurement equipment. 1.4 Print out the data base and compare the results to the project and the City's parameters. 1.5 Prepare a written report. 2.0 CLIENT PLIED ITEMS The client will supply a site plan, grading plans, and any other materials pertinent to the project. 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K Santa Ana, California 92705-8518 ?hone (714) 835-0249 FAX (714) 835-1957 %l 96J190 P� 3.0 MEETINGS No meetings are included in the Scope -of -Work as in projects of this type, no meetings are deemed necessary. Meetings are invoiced at our hourly rate of $145.00 should the occasion arise. However, in projects- of this type, meetings do not normally occur. 4.0 FEE The fee for the Tasks outlined in the Scope -of -Work will be a not -to -exceed figure of $450. Tasks outside the Scope are invoiced at $145.00 per hour, unless the subject of a separate fixed quotation. The fee is due and payable on a net 30 day basis. Payments after 30 days are subject to a 1t per month interest fee on the remaining balance. Four additional 24 hour measurement positions may be added to the Scope of work at a fee of $125 per position. Extra measurement positions beyond the first five will require another site visit. Thus, the fee schedule would repeat starting at $450 for the sixth position plus $125 for each additional position up to the tenth position. 5.0 SCHEDULE The schedule will be that required by the client. Normal production time is seven to ten working days. Thank you. Prepared by: Christopher Jean Staff Engineer 1 11 9- 0 U I 1 a 1 [l 1 1 1 1 1 1 96/190 GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES 1. PROJECT This agreement is between EDAW and Gordon Bricken and Associates, Inc., for the project known as MCDONNELL DOUGLAS EIR -- 24 HOUR MEASUREMENT -- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH. 2. SERVICE Gordon Bricken and Associates, Inc. will provide the services outlined in Proposal 96/190. 3. COMPENSATION The fee will be $450 for one measurement position. Up to four additional measurement positions may be added at $125 each. Starting with the sixth measurement position, the fee schedule repeats. 4. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Any charges for special delivery or insurance vouchers. 5. INSja,NCE The firm carries Workman's Compensation as required by law and conventional liability. Additional insurance or insurance vouchers will be invoiced to the client. 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K - Santa Ana, California 92705-8518 Phone (714) M-0249 - FAX (714) 835-1957 I 4 a 1 I 1 1 1 7, 1 1 1 9. 7. 961190 FINAL PRODUCT Two copies of the report shall be made available to the Client. NO additional SerViN Of r6ports is included. Delivery is by standard U.S. Mail. Special mailing services such as UPS, Federal Express, Priority Mail, etc., are not included. Payment is due and payable on a net 30 day basis. Interest at one percent (it) per month will accrue on unpaid balance starting on the 30th day after delivery. The party signing the agreement agrees to be the responsible payee. If an agent is operating on behalf of a third party, and said party is the responsible payee, that party will sign this contract. Payment delays caused by failure of a third party to pay the payee are not considered grounds for failure to pay unless prior arrangements are made. The above is mutually agreed upon on Client Name (Print) ITelephone 1 Title . 1996. Authorization Signature er jean, stazz r;ngineer for Gordon Brieken and Associates Inc. 1 5 E 93/477 Q GORDON BRICKEN & ASSOCIATES ■ CONSULTING ACOUSTICAL and ENERGY ENGINEERS GORDON L. BRICKEN Principal Engineer EDUCATION BACKGROUND Loyola University, Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering; University of California at Los Angeles, Master of Science, Electrical Engineering; University of California at Irvine, Certificate in Urban Planning MEMBERSHIPS National Council of Acoustical Consultants Acoustical Society of America Institute of Noise Control Engineering Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) American Institute of Planners (AIP) International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) American Society of Planning.Officials (ASPO) National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) Building Industry Association (BIA) BACKGROUND Twenty-five years experience with major companies involving acoustical and vibration system analyses and experimentation. Principal investigator on numerous projects. concerned -with the development of sound generation, measurement, and microphone calibration procedures and equipment. Extensive studies involving environmental noise assessment. 1621 East Seventeenth Street, Suite K � Santa Ana,.California 9Z701 � .. Phone (7i4j 835=4Z49 FAX (714) 835-1957 1 1 1 REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE ...Studies of airport/community noise exposure from flight opera- tions --- development of. procedures for analysis and field monitoring of optimal flight profiles for minimal community noise exposure. ...Development of industrial noise measurement and engineering control procedures. ...Studies on motorsport'noise exposure including Drag Races,. CART Indianapolis tars, Formula I cars, Go-Karts,.Drag Boats, and a large variety of one -of -a -kind racing -vehicles. ...Studies on building noise reduction requirements, including schools, industrial buildings, and residential units. ...Specialized projects on airport noise monitoring systems and techniques. ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE Publications covering various aspects of the acoustical sciences and related engineering applications, court appearances as an expert witness, presentations before.numerous public bodies (i.e. Board of Supervisors, City Councils, Planning Commissions, Coastal Commission, etc.). In addition, served on public bodies including the Planning Commission, and the City Council. This experience included the �. Chairmanship of the Planning Commission and Mayor of -the City. ` CAPABILITIES[EXPERIENCE. GORDON BRICKEN has performed over ten thousand ..(10,000) noise assessment and community noise studies for a variety of residential and commercial developments and municipalities. Noise Element Studies have been prepared for the following communities: City of Santa Ana City of Santa Clara City of Cypress City of Santa Fe Springs City of Costa Mesa. City of. Arcadia City.of Oxnard City of Westminster City of San Jose City of Los -Alamitos City of Stanton City of Garden Grove City of Gardena City of Brea City of Claremont - City of Pomona• City of Santa Monica City of La Quinta City of San Diego County of Orange FREEWAY AND RAILROAD STUDIES Freeway and railroad noise barrier'studies have been prepared for the Cities -'of Seal Beach, Brea, San Jose, Norwalk, La Quinta, Philadelphia, and Arcadia, AIRPORT AND RELATED AIRCRAFT STUDIES Airport and related aircraft noise'studies have been prepared in - connection with the following: John Wayne Airport/Santa Ana Southwest International Airport/Puerto Rico Ontario International Airport/Ontario Seattle/Tacoma International Airport/Seattle Fresno Municipal Airport/Fresno Houston International Airport/Houston Palmdale International Airport/Palmdale .Hobby Airport/Houston Keahole Airport/Hawaii Los Angeles International Airport/Los Angeles Sacramento Metropolitan Airport/Sacramento Sacramento International-Airport/Sacramento Hawthorne Municipal Airport/Hawthorne Compton Airport/Compton General Fox Field/Lancaster Plant 42 Field/Palmdale San Fernando Airport/San-Fernando Hollywood Burbank Airport/Burbank Long Beach Municipal Airport/Long Beach Oxnard Municipal Airport/Oxnard Torrance Municipal Airport/Torrance HELIPORT/HELICOPTER ASSESSMENTS Heliport/helicopter"noise assessments have been prepared in connection.with the following facilities: Heliport Operations/Kaiser Permanente Hospital, Fontana Heliport Operations/Sherman baks'Burn Center, Sherman Oaks Heliport Operations/Mission Viejo Community Hospital, Mission Viejo MOTORSPORT NOISE ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN Motorsport noise assessment and design studies have been prepared in connection with. -the following facilities (Bricken'and Associates, Inc.., has -the largest inventory of motorsport case data in the United States): Los Angeles County Raceway/Los Angeles (Road Racing and Drag :Racing), 1984,'1985., and 1987 National. HotRod Association's world Drag..Racing Events/Pomona (Drag Racing) Ontario Motor Speedway/Ontario(CART Racing) Long Beach Grand Prix/Long Beach (Formula I and CART Cars) LaVerne Grand Prix/Laverne (Go -Karts) Del Mar Grand Prix/Del Mar (IMSA Cars) Riverside'International Raceway/Riverside (Stock Cars, IMSA Cars,: and CART) Texas Motor Speedway/Dallas (Drag Racing) Baylands Raceway/Foster City (Drag Racing) Spokane International Raceway/Spokane (Drag Racing) Ora.nge County International Raceway/Irvine (Drag Racing) Rose Bowl/Pasadena (Off -Road Racing and Motocross) Orange County Fairgrounds/Costa'-Mesa-(Motorcycles.) Anaheim Stadium/Anaheim (Motocross) TRUCK CENTER DESIGN'AND ASSESSMENT Truck Center design and assessment includes the following: .Milne Truck .Center Evaluation/Los Angeles Consolidated Beverage Di-stribution.Center/Buena Park I i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 I SCHOOL FACILITY NOISE ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN School facility noise assessment and -design projects include the following: Santa Ana Unified School. District/Santa Ana (8 locations) Brea-Olinda Friends Church School/Brea La Mirada Baptist Church School/La Mirada La Habra'Community Church School/La Habra Rancho Santiago College new campus/Orange Calvary Baptist School/Gardena Brea-Olinda School District/Brea Long Beach Unified School District/Long Beach Mater Dei High School/Santa.Ana First -Christian School/Lancaster Mormon Church/LaCanada Flintridge COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT STUDIES Community Redevelopment studies have been prepared for: City of San Diego City of Pomona City of Orange City of Riverside City of Santa Ana City of'Pasadena TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS Transportation projects have been prepared for: Los Angeles Department of Airports Orange County Transportation District City of Seal Beach City of. Santa Ana i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City of Orange California Department of Transportation City of Riverside Pennsylvania Department of Transportation SPECIALIZED STUDIES. Specialized noise measurement studies include: Enniss Sand Extraction/San Diego County Lakeside Pumping Station/San Diego County Power Substation/Disneyland hotel/Anaheim Pacific Amphitheatre Community Monitoring/Costa Mesa Bullet.Train Evaluation Project/Santa Ana San Bernardino Spirit Baseball Team/San Bernardino Drier Facility Measurement-Project/Loma Linda Foods Trash Transfer Facility/County of• Orange Mobil Coach Product Development/Fleetwood Industries Landfill Operations/K-Y Corporation Food Processing Facility/City of Padadena Generator Set Measurements/Pacific Telephone Wind Machine Noise/Mind Machine Corporation Twenty-second Agricultural District Fair/Del Mar MILITARY PROJECTS Military projects include the following: Base -Housing Testing/Fort Polk, Louisiana (Army) Base Housing Design/El Toro MCAS (Marine Corps) Officers Quarters Design/El Toro MCAS (Marine Corps) Education Facility Design/Tustin, MCAS (Marine Corps). 1 Communications Center Design/USAF (Air Force) Cantonment Area Design/Diego Garcia (Air Force) REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS GORDON BRICKEN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. performs noise assessment studies which include noise measurements and analysis to establish the future environment, preparation of noise contours, assessment of -impact_, and development of mitigation measures consistent with the project's objectives. IGENERAL AND SPECIFIC PLAN NOISE STUDIES 1 I 1 1 General and specific plan noise studies have been prepared for a .number of major residential developments in California. A partial list follows: Payne Ranch/Chino Nellie Gail Ranch/Laguna hills Victor/Rancho Cucamonga Terra Vista/Rancho Cucamonga Valencia Ranch/Valencia Northwoods/Irvine . Moreno Valley Ranch/Moreno Valley Sunny Ranch/Moreno Valley East highlands Ranch/San Bernardino RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS A partial list of residential unit developments include: A-&, C. Properties, Inc./Irvine Ahmanson Developments, Inc./Covina Arciero and Sons, Inc./Anaheim Arnel Development/Santa Ana AVCO Development/Orange County Bixby Land Company/Long Beach Broadmoor Homes/Irvine Century Hill Company/Los Angeles Citation Builders/Tustin Covington Brothers/Fullerton Emblem Development/Fullerton Fieldstone Company/Brea "Forecast Corporation/Rancho Cucamonga The Irvine Company/Newport Beach .-The M. D. Janes Company/Costa Mesa Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. Kennedy and Hause/Orange Laing Homes/Irvine Lewis Homes of California/Upland William Lyon Company/Newport Beach Markborough California, Inc./Newport Beach Mission Viejo Company/Mission Viejo Neil Stanton Palmer, Architect/Irvine Orange County Community Housing/Santa Ana Pelican Properties, Inc./Santa Ana The Pennhill Company/Tustin The Planning Center/Newport Beach Frank Politeo and Associates/San Pedro i Presley of Southern California/Irvine S & S Corporation/Los Angeles Santiago Corporation/Santa Ana The Warmington Company/Moreno Valley Watt Industries -- P-H-S/Santa Monica Zember Construction Co., Inc./Los Alamitos HOTEL/MOTEL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS Assessments of hotel/motel and commercial developments requiring noise control in the planning and design phases have been prepared for'the following clients: VTN/Santa Ana Robert Warmington Company/Costa Mesa Super 8 Hotels/Newport Beach Wendy's/Fountain Valley Carl Karcher, Inc./Anaheim Del Taco Corporation/Newport Beach. Northrop Corporation/Los Angeles Quality Inns of America/various locations Sixpence Inns of America/various locations Irvine Company/Irvine COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL Commercial/Industrial acoustical noise studies and noise control design for Commercial/Industrial Development and Facility Noise Control include the following: VTN/Santa Ana Northrop Corporation/Los Angeles Hughes Aircraft Corporation/Fullerton Red Onion Restaurants/Huntington Beach Milne Truck Lines/Los.Angeles Balboa Inn/Balboa Chrysler Corporation/Ontario La Habra Chevrolet/La Habra rI 1 Pico Rivera Water District/Pico Rivera City of Upland/Upland San Diego Gas and Electric/San Diego Western Empire/Oceanside PAPERS AND LECTURES Gordon Bricken routinely lectures and writes in the field of Acoustics and related subjects. A representative sampling i-s listed below. "THE RESULTS OF AN AREAWIDE MONITORING SYSTEM",, Acoustical Society of America, 83rd Convention, April, 1972. "INDUSTRIAL NOISE CONTROL", Environmental Seminar, California Society for Professional Engineers, November, 1972, Pierce College, Los Angeles. "ENFORCEMENT OF LOCAL NOISE ORDINANCES", Southern California Association of Governments, Noise Seminar, June, 1974 "SIMPLIFIED METHOD OF TESTING PARTY WALLS", Acoustical Society of America, September, 1976. ' "COMMUNITY IMPACTS FROM MOTOR SPORTS EVENTS", National Hot Rod Association, February, 1987. 1 C. 1 1 1 1 ATTACHMENT 6 0 Attachment No. 6 Break Down of Existing and Vacant Property in the McDonnell Business Park Specific Plan Area The McDonnell Business Park Specific Plan area consists of a total of approximately 307 acres. The project site is bounded on the north by Rancho Road and the US Navy railroad right-of-way, on the east by Springdale Street, on the south by Bolsa Avenue and on the west by Bolsa Chica Street. As indicated below, approximately 173.40 acres of the 307 acres are developed or entitled to be developed. More specifically the site is developed and is anticipated to be developed as follows McDonnell Douglas Aerospace (Aerospace Operations)................................120 Acres McDonnell Centre Business Park....................93 Acres Cambro.......... 11.9 Acres Sharp.............23.4 Acres Phase I.............8.0 Acres (vacant) Phase II .......... 14.5 Acres (vacant) Phase III ......... 35.3 Acres (vacant) Mixed Use Office Complex ............................18 Acres Vacant Perimeter...........................................58 Acres Street Roads etc..........................................18 Acres TOTAL AREA............................................307 Acres COPIES A VAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ATTACHMENT 5 RECEIVED CITY CLERK WM HUNTINCTOh JUN 21 5 U �-�-c 4� 5 APR 2 5 1996 • RECEIYED CITY CLERK i 11v l� HUNTINCTr 1, 1 r% 'iIF. iosal to Submitted by: Planning Consultants Research and: Planning Company Associates In association with: Patricia Smith, ASLA RKJK & Associates, Inc. 1 • • 1 PCR PLANNING CONSULTANTS RESEARCH 1 April 25,1996 .9r. Floward Zelefsky Director of Planning; ' CITY OF I-IUN-1-1`GI-O` BEACH 2000 tilain Street Huntington Beach, California 92748 1 RE: SUPPLEMENTAL PROPOSAL TO PREPARE A SPECIFIC PLAN AND MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK Dear .%W. Zelefsky: Pursuant to the Ciry's Supplement to the Request for Proposal for the McDonnell Center Specific Plan ' and )Master Environmental Impact Reportdated April 17, 1996, Planning;Consultants Research (PCR) and Plan- ning Company Associates (PCA) arc: pleased to provide the attached Supplement to our previously submitted Pro- posal dated .'larch 28, 1996. The information contained iti rhis Supplement is intended to complement the previ- ous submission and provide specific modifications to address issues raised by tile. City. Except as modified by this Supplement, the PCR/PCA -1cam proposal of [March 28 remains valid. 1 The modifications presented in this Supplement include: • Revisions to the Scope of Work and Budget to align our proposed work program with the City's revised expectations and to rake advantage of work already accomplished by ,ik1cDonnell Dou-glas. This process is designed to achieve a comprehensive land use Elan for the iklcDonnell Centre Business Park with integral flexibility to respond to changing marker conditions over time within a coherent urban design context. 1 • Introduction of Parricia Smith, ASLA, in place of The SWA Group to provide urban design re- view of the proposed Specific Plan. %Is. Smith is a registered landscape architect and has exten- sivecxpericnce in the preparation of Specific Plans, Master Piansand Urban Design Plans through- out ia and New York. Ms. Smiths participation will allow the PCR-ream to achieve greater pricing efficiency for the project. 1 We continue to look forward to working with the City on this challenging; project. Please feel free to con- tact either ofus ar our Laguna Beach office for any addirional information you require. 1 Sincerely, PLANNING CONSUI_TA1TS RESEARCH (5�_ I-JJ &,W Gregory_J. Broughton,(Gregorti fall President Vice President 233 Wilshire Bouievard, Suite 13o, Santa Monica, CA 90401 939 Glennevre Street, Suite B. Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Tel) 310 • 451 • 4488 / Fax) 310 • 451 • 5279 Tel) 714 • 497 • 0144 / Fax) 714 • 497 • 0158 1 E-Mail) per@chelsea.ios.com E-Mail) coneco@aol.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I. REVISED APPROACH .................................. 1 11. REVISED BUDGET .................................... 23 III. REVISED SCHEDULE .................................. 26 City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page i April 25, 1996 I. Revised Approach Proposal for MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK ,SPECIFIC PLAN AND MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 1 I. REVISED APPROACH The PCR/PCA Team has updated our approach to this project from the presentation in the March 28, 1996 Proposal in order to reflect the revised expectations of the City and to take ' advantage of work already accomplished by the current property owner/applicant (McDonnell Douglas Realty Company). The revised approach focuses on reviewing a draft Specific Plan to be provided by the project applicant and working with the City and the applicant to bring the Specific Plan to final form. Once the Specific Plan is completed to the satisfaction of all parties, the PCR/PCA Team will prepare the environmental analysis and documentation required by CEQA for the development scenario which would be allowed under the provisions of the Specific Plan. Potential alternative land use plans would be examined in the alternatives analysis provided in the MEIR document. Under this revised approach, we have modified the PCR/PCA Team to include the participation of Patricia Smith, ASLA, in place of The SWA Group to provide urban design review of the proposed Specific Plan. Ms. Smith is a registered landscape architect and a former Vice President with the USC Real Estate Development Corporation and Gruen Associates, with extensive experience in the preparation of Specific Plans, Master Plans and Urban Design Plans throughout California and New York. She has worked with both local ' jurisdictions and private developers to prepare plans that achieve community objectives and, at the same time, maximize flexibility for development projects in meeting those objectives. A sampling of her project experience includes: • Mission Street and Blue Line Station Specific Plan and EIR South Pasadena. The Mission Street Specific Plan and Blue Line Station Concept Design, currently being prepared by Ms. Smith, will guide development and land use in the vicinity of the future light rail station and along Mission Street, South Pasadena's historic "Main Street". The Plan, prepared under the guidance of a 25-member task force representing property owners, business owners and residents will identify market niche and economic development strategies, compatible mix and intensity of land uses, development standards and design guidelines and implementation programs. • Transit -Served Community Development_ Standards, Sterling Forest, New York. Ms. Smith formulated a series of development standards to implement a new community that will accommodate 35,000 residents on 25% of a 17,500 acre City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re. McDonnell Centre Business Park Page I April 25, 1996 I. Revised Approach site. A single set of standards was designed to interface with the existing standards of the three towns in which the community was located. The standards addressed permanent open space, roadway design, housing design, commercial development design and utilities. • Urban Design and Development Concepts for Targeted Growth Areas, Los Angeles. Ms. Smith prepared a series of urban design investigations and corresponding development standards and design guidelines for areas that will be designated by the City of Los Angeles' General Plan Framework to accommodate the majority of all future development (95 % of all new commercial development and 75 % of all new housing). • Streetscapg Improvement Program, Beverly Hills Triangle. Ms. Smith managed the conceptual design and planning phase of the City of Beverly Hills streetscape improvement program for the central commercial district. The program included not only physical improvements, but a coordinated program of focused activities, management initiatives and land use approaches. A revised PCR/PCA Team organization chart is included in this section of the Supplemental Proposal. A complete Statement of Qualifications for Ms. Smith's firm is included in Appendix A to this Supplement. The remainder of this Supplemental Proposal consists of the following three components: (1) Revised Scope of Work, which comprises the remainder of this section; (2) Revised Budget; and (3) Revised Schedule, which are contained in the two following sections, respectively. Revised Scope of Work In response to changes in the scope of services identified in the Supplement to the RFP, the PCR/PCA Team has updated the previously provided work program to meet the revised project specifications. This revised work program is targeted to the stated objectives of the City and consists of four major tasks, which include: ' Task Description 1.0 REVIEW OF DRAFT SPECIFIC PLAN 2.0 SPECIFIC PLAN REVISIONS (OPTIONAL) 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND DOCUMENTATION 4.0 MEETINGS/HEARINGS City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re, McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 2 April 25, 1996 LANDOWNER(S) MCDONNELL DOUGLAS REALTY COMPANY SPECIFIC PLAN PCA Jc: miianc Name Shannon Smith Mclanic Traatc, The City of Huntington Beach �.ITI OI HUNTINGTON BLAC'li DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Melanie Fallon Howard Zelefsky IIROGRAM MANAGEMENT Gregory-J. Broughton DaviJ Grannis P,inripal-in-Charge Phngrint Manayct URBAN DESIGN Patricia Smith, ASLA McDonnell Centre Business Park ENPIRONAIENTAL PCR 6.Cg Veil Craig Falnnr Laura K:mlman Gilhc,t Ruiz Geo,gc Pollock Arc Powc, Ashley Rogers COMMUNITY BUSINESS INTERESTS RESIDENT INTERESTS TRANSPORTATION RKJK & Asiociatc Rohc,T Kahn Lil,n Kain I 1 1. Revised Approach TASK 1.0 REVIEW OF DRAFT SPECIFIC PLAN The PCR/PCA Team would propose to commence preparation of the Specific Plan and Master Environmental Impact Report for the McDonnell Centre Business Park at an initial coordination meeting attended by the City and the PCR/PCA Team. The focus of this meeting will be: (1) clarifying the scope of work and identifying the key issues, from the City's perspective, associated with the proposed Specific Plan; (2) receiving the draft Specific Plan from the City and refining the schedule for review; and (3) receiving and reviewing other information and documents which are deemed appropriate by the City. The PCR/PCA Team will also identify any additional information requirements which may be necessary for successful completion of this task, beyond those articulated below. The RFP requests a complete list of data and information required by the consultant team from the developer and/or the City with a time frame indicated for receipt of the data. The PCR/PCA Team recommends that this list be fully fleshed out as part of Task 1.0. Preliminarily, the following partial list is suggestive of the kinds of information that we would Iike to have available at the outset of work. • Relevant General Plan policies and elements. • Site -specific topographic map at suitable scale and resolution for planning and illustrative purposes. • Previous relevant planning documents and FIRS for the property, inclusive of infrastructure data, existing uses, etc. • Existing proposals/plans for future use of the property. • Real estate market and economic forecasts, if any, prepared by the land owner. • Property ownership boundaries and lists of site and immediate environs. • Existing traffic and circulation system data. • Known natural and man-made constraints on the property (e.g., flood hazard, hazardous materials, etc.) • Mapped encumbrances, including utility and other easements. Linder the revised approach, the PCR/PCA Team proposes to evaluate the draft Specific Plan provided by the Applicant using similar criteria as articulated in the original Proposal, including examining proposed land uses and densities, the flexibility incorporated in the Plan City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 3 April 25. 1996 1 1. Revised Approach to modify the placement of land uses within the Specific Plan areal, urban and landscape design guidelines, parking, infrastructure, public services, building envelopes, setbacks, massing by land use type and compatibility, intra-land uses relationship, noise, light and glare, landscape concept design, etc. These guidelines should be supported by clearly illustrated plans, diagrams, cross -sections and other graphics. As noted in the original Proposal, a well - articulated urban vision for the property is fundamental to the success of the project. Implementation mechanisms and development standards should provide the regulatory and procedural language that can be adopted and codified as ordinance in the Zoning sections of the City's Municipal Code. The regulations will set forth the means and the procedures to implement the design guidelines. This section may contain the following or equivalent sub- sections: a. Purpose and application b. Definitions c. General Provisions d. Permit requirements and procedures e. Development regulations State law and common practice requires that a General Plan consistency analysis be part of a statutory specific plan. The consistency analysis process will. involve review of all general plan elements and their constituent policies and programs and will determine in summary/tabular form the following: (1) Whether the General Plan policy is relevant; (2) Whether the General Plan policy is a city-wide policy applicable to all planning areas; and (3) How specific plan policies, programs and regulations specifically conform or respond to the General Plan. At the conclusion of the review of the draft Specific Plan, the PCR/PCA Team will prepare a brief letter summary of the findings of the review and recommendations for potential revisions for consideration by the City and, if appropriate, the project applicant. The recommendations would be focused on improving the utility of the Specific Plan for both the City and the applicant. 1 It is likely that the applicant's proposed Specific Plan will not provide comparable flexibility with respect to including a variety of types and intensities of land uses within the Specific Plan area as would the equivalency concept articulated in the PCR/PCA Team's original proposal. Nevertheless, it will likely be possible to build a degree of flexibility into the Specific Plan which allows the intensity and distribution of land uses within the Specific Plan area to vary in a manner which can serve the potential interests of both the City and the Applicant. This premise will guide the review of the draft Specific Plan with respect to this issue. City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 4 April 25, 1996 0 • r 1 r_ 1 f� 1 I n 1 I. Revised Approach Task 1.0 Products: 1. Letter report providing results of review of draft Specific Plan and recommendations for possible revisions. TASK 2.0 SPECIFIC PLAN REVISIONS (OPTIONAL) Based upon the City's own review of the draft Specific Plan and the PCR/PCA Team's letter report developed in Task 1.0, as well as any additional input provided by the applicant, if appropriate, it will be possible to determine if modifications to the draft Specific Plan are warranted. Since the extent of such potential changes cannot be determined at this time, the PCR/PCA Team proposes to approach this task with the greatest degree of flexibility in order to allow the City to closely direct the process. As soon as possible following submission of the Task 1.0 letter report, the PCR/PCA Team would propose to meet with City staff to identify a strategy, scope of work, assignment of responsibilities and schedule for finalizing the Specific Plan. If the City deems that no changes in the draft Specific Plan are necessary, this optional task would not be exercised and the project could proceed directly to environmental review. However, since the scope of this task is presently unknown, an allowance of seven weeks and $45,000 has been provided within this Supplemental Proposal (discussed in greater detail in the following sections). Regardless of the magnitude of required changes to the proposed Specific Plan, the goal of this approach is to complete the Specific Plan in the most expeditious and equitable manner for all parties, in order to allow preparation of the environmental documentation to commence. Background data collection for the MEIR will be undertaken simultaneously with preparation of revisions to the draft Specific Plan in order to minimize preparation time for the MEIR (see Task 3.2) Task 2.0 Products: 1. Finalized Specific Plan TASK 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND DOCUMENTATION The PCR/PCA Team has developed a work program for environmental analysis and documentation which meets the following requirements in support of the McDonnell Centre Business Park Project: City or Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 5 April 25, 1996 I. Revised Approach • Prepares all environmental documents for the project required by the City. • Supports processing of these documents through the various levels of public input, public review and City decision -making. This task consists of the six sub -tasks described below. 3.1 Initial Study, Notice of Preparation, Public Scoping 3.2 Preparation of Administrative Draft MEIR 3.3 Draft MEIR 3.4 Mitigation Monitoring Plan 3.5 Preparation of Responses to Comments/Draft Final MEIR 3.6 Final MEIR 3.1 Initial Study, Notice of Preparation, Public Scoping The process of preparing environmental documentation for the proposed McDonnell Centre Business Park Project is proposed to be initiated at the completion of the proposed Specific Plan, at a coordination meeting attended by the City and the PCR/PCA Team. The focus of this meeting will be: (1) clarifying the scope of work and reviewing the approach to the issues to be included in the Draft MEIR; (2) refining the schedule for the environmental review process; (3) reviewing the approach to alternatives; and (4) receiving and reviewing other information and documents which are deemed appropriate by the City. PCR will also identify any additional information requirements which may be necessary for successful completion of Task 3.1. PCR will prepare a draft Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the entitlement program allowed under the project's Specific Plan. This document will focus and clarify the potential range of actions, and potentially significant effects to be analyzed in the MEIR based on the final determination of the characteristics of the proposed Specific Plan (e.g., land uses/densities, design features, etc.) It will also provide a factual basis for excluding any issues which clearly do not have potential for significant effect, controversy, or to influence the outcome of the planning process. The Initial Study/NOP will provided to the City for review prior to circulation. City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants ResearchlPlanning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 6 April 25, 1996 -` — I. Revised Approach The EIR scoping meeting will be held during the 30-day Notice of Preparation (NOP) ' review period and will provide an opportunity for the 'community to ask questions about the process and voice specific environmental concerns. We will work closely with staff to identify the organizations and groups that would have a stake in the outcome of the project so that we ' can involve them in the process. 3.2 Preparation of Administrative Draft MEIR Preparation of the Administrative Draft MEIR will formally commence upon completion of the Initial Study and will absorb the data collection products undertaken during the incorporation of revisions to the proposed Specific Plan (Task 2.0). We will provide the City with a list of any additional information which may be required from the City to complete the MEIR. The PCR/PCA Team will review relevant City plans, regulations, policies, and related environmental documentation. ' In addition to responsible City departments, the Team will consult with SCAG, the South Coast Air Quality Management District, and any State, regional, and local responsible agencies, trustee agencies and agencies having jurisdiction by law, as appropriate. Ongoing consultation, as appropriate, will be maintained with these departments and agencies throughout the environmental review process. The Administrative Draft MEIR will include all CEQA and City -required sections in a City -approved format with high quality graphics which meet the legal requirements of a complete, adequate and objective disclosure of the potential environmental consequences of the project. Although the precise scope of the Draft MEIR cannot be completely known until the completion of the Initial Study/NOP, the following environmental issues outlined in the RFP are expected to be identified for inclusion in the MEIR: 1. Earth 2. Air Quality 3. Drainage 4. Water/Natural Resources/Energy Impacts 5. Agriculture b_ Noise 7. Light & Glare 8. Land Use Compatibility 9. Population, Housing and Employment 10. Traffic/Circulation 11. Public Services 12. Utilities 13. Urban Design City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 7 April 25, 1996 1. Revised Approach The PCR/PCA Team's analytic approach and scope for each technical environmental issue listed above is presented in subsection 3.7 following the overview of the environmental work program. PCR will submit ten (10) copies of the Administrative Draft MEIR to the City for review. 3.3 Draft MEIR Subsequent to the City's review of the Administrative Draft MEIR, PCR will prepare one additional Administrative Draft for the City, which incorporates changes identified by the City's review. In addition, a final camera-ready version of the Draft MEIR will be provided to the City for final approval prior to printing and public distribution. PCR has established an allowance of 120 hours of staff time to complete changes to the Draft MEIR following submission of the Draft MEIR and to publish the Draft MEIR. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that PCR will provide ten (10) copies of the subsequent Administrative Draft and 65 copies and one (1) reproducible copy of the Draft MEIR to the City. The Draft MEIR will be circulated by the City for public comment for a minimum of 45 days. 3.4 Mitigation Monitoring Program PCR will work with City staff to submit the Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) to the City with the 2nd Administrative Draft MEIR, after the initial set of mitigation . measures have been subjected to City review and comment. The MMP will contain a compilation of mitigation measures presented in the MEIR, listed by impact category, with agency responsibility and monitoring phase identified for each measure. These mitigation measures and the established monitoring program will be fully consistent with City policies and programs. The Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program will be included in the 2nd Administrative Draft and in the Draft MEIR as a Technical Appendix. 3.5 Preparation of Responses to Comments/Draft Final MEIR At the conclusion of the public review period, the City shall forward all comments received on the Draft MEIR to the Team. After consultation with City staff, the PCR/PCA Team will prepare draft responses to comments and an Administrative Final MEIR containing corrections and additions to the Draft MEIR identified from review comments. This document will respond to all written comments received from the general public, responsible agencies and other interested parties during the public hearing and during the public review period. The Final MEIR will include all correspondence with a double cross reference system whereby every comment is responded to and corrections are made in the body of the Draft MEIR in redline/ City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re. McDonnell Centre Business Park Page $ April 25, 1996 I. Revised Approach strikeout format. Simultaneously with preparation of the 1st Administrative Final MEIR, we will prepare a Final Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) reflecting changes in mitigation measures as a result of comments received on the Draft MEIR. Ten (10) copies of the draft Responses to Comments/Draft Final MEIR will be submitted to the City for review. It is difficult to predict the public reaction to the Draft MEIR at this time. Depending ' upon the political situation in the City at the time the Draft MEIR is circulated, general economic and social conditions in the area, the reaction of surrounding neighbors to the project ' and other factors which are wholly unpredictable and beyond the control of either the City or the Team at this juncture, public reaction to the Draft MEIR could range widely. For purposes of this proposal, it is assumed that public reaction to the document will be moderate. t Accordingly, we have allocated 100 staff hours of staff time for preparation of the Responses to Comments and Ist Administrative Final MEIR documents, which constitutes an estimated amount for this task. In the event that the public comments on the Draft MEIR fall below this ' estimate, only the actual time required to respond to the comments received and create the redline/strikeout revisions to the Draft MEIR will be billed. However, in the event that the ' public response to the Draft MEIR is greater than expected, the Team will expect to meet with the City at the earliest possible time to develop adjustments to the work program as necessary. 3.6 Final MEIR The review process for this project includes submission of a 2nd Administrative Final ' MEIR after City comments are received on the 1st Administrative Final MEIR as well as City staff review/approval of the camera-ready Final MEIR prior to its publication. We have ' allocated 60 staff hours to complete all changes resulting from City staff review of the Administrative Final MEIR and to publish the document. The Team will provide ten (10) copies of the 2nd Final MEIR and 35 copies and one (1) reproducible copy of the Final MEIR, t including Responses to Comments and Corrections and Additions, for distribution by the City, once the document has received final approval. Each report will be physically constructed in sectional, tabular form with a medium -hard cover separating each section according to the task ' categories. PCR will work with the City to provide sufficient copies of the Final MEIR for distribution to commenting agencies at least ten (10) days prior to certification of the Final ' MEIR. 3.7 Technical Scope for Draft MEIR ' From the PCR/PCA Team's review of the materials provided by the City, subsequent discussions and site visit, the following outline presents the suggested organization of the Draft 1 ' city or Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 9 April 25, 1996 I. Revised Approach MEIR. The cost estimate provided in this proposal is based on this proposed Draft MEIR outline. McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK PROJECT DRAFT MEIR OUTLINE I. Executive Summary II. Project Description III. Environmental Setting IV. Environmental Impact Analysis A. Earth B. Air Quality C. Drainage D. Water/Natural Resources/Energy Impacts E. Agriculture F. Noise G. Light & Glare H. Land Use Compatibility I. Population, Housing and Employment J. Traffic/Circulation K. Public Services L. Utilities M. Urban Design V. Significant Environmental Effects which Cannot be Mitigated VI. AIternatives VIL Relationship between Local Short -Term Uses and Long -Term Productivity VIII. Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes IX. Growth -Inducing Impacts X. Persons and Organizations Consulted XI. Bibliography Appendices to the Draft MEIR will include the Traffic Study, other technical materials, as appropriate, the Initial Study and public comments on the Notice of Preparation, Mitigation Monitoring Program and other studies or documentation as determined to be relevant by the City. City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 10 April 25. 1996 I. Revised Approach A brief discussion of the technical work program to be undertaken in each of the key areas shown in the outline is provided in the following sections. Executive Summary The Executive Summary is intended to encapsulate the entire MEIR in order to provide a quick understanding of the project's predicted impacts. It will identify, in an overview fashion, the proposed project under consideration and its objectives including any design features of the project which will be implemented. The Executive Summary will identify and briefly discuss the environmental impacts associated with project implementation (whether beneficial or adverse, significant as well as nonsignificant), and will contain a summary analysis of the alternatives to the proposed plan. The Executive: Summary will also include a table identifying all of the issues evaluated, along with conclusions regarding project impacts, the recommended mitigation measures, and a statement of the level of significance after mitigation. Project Description The Project Description will be composed of three subsections: Location and Boundaries, Statement of Objectives, and Program Characteristics. (1) Location and Boundaries The Location and Boundaries subsection will provide a description of the size, location, and boundaries of the proposed project site. The site's location within the southern California region relative to the City of Huntington Beach, .the City's commercial and industrial areas, residential districts, communities and surrounding cities will be described and illustrated. This subsection will also contain a description and illustration of general plan land uses and designated zoning. This description will utilize maps and other graphics, including regional and neighborhood location maps. (2) Statement of Objectives A Statement of Project Objectives regarding the manner in which the plan area is proposed to be developed in coordination with City staff. These objectives will generally be planning -oriented, environmental and socioeconomic. Given the experiences of similar projects and court decisions regarding alternatives, the Statement of Project Objectives is important to the MEIR process. This discussion will set the framework for the selection of the range of alternatives to be evaluated within the MEIR. City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants ResearchiPlanning Company Associates supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 11 April 25, 1996 0 1. Revised Approach (3) Program Characteristics This subsection will commence with an overview of the CEQA project components. The ' general information contained within the overview will be presented and illustrated in computer generated graphics where appropriate. Information presented will include: the amount of developed space (in square feet of floor area) included within the development program allowed ' under the project's Specific Plan, design criteria and programs, and circulation elements, infrastructure improvements, special facilities, proposed street configuration, anticipated project schedule and list of required government actions. The Program Characteristics subsection will also include a discussion of project construction and scheduling. Environmental Settinl? This section will provide an overview of the environmental setting in which the project site is located. An analysis of the major environmental characteristics of the project area will be presented, along with a discussion of the land uses and activities in the neighborhoods surrounding the area. Environmental Lnpact _Anal For each issue identified in the Initial Study, this section will include Environmental Setting, Impacts, Mitigation Measures, Cumulative Impacts, and Unavoidable Adverse Effects2. The assessment of environmental impacts will be consistent with other City environmental documentation and CEQA requirements. The following is an overview of the approach to each technical environmental issue identified in the projected Draft MEIR outline above. These issues reflect those areas where implementation of the project could potentially result in impacts to the environment. (1) Earth PCR will base this assessment on a review of existing soils information (USGS/USDA) and locations of known faults (USGS and State Division of Mines and Geology maps). The analysis will include a review of the plan area's soil associations, as well as the soil's potential for erosion and expansion. The environmental analysis will also study the major faults in the area and determine the proximity of the plan area to fault zones of local and regional Z In a minor departure from the City's EIR outline, the PCR Team would propose to address cumulative impacts on an issue -by -issue basis, rather than in a single section. City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park page 12 April 25. 1996 1. Revised Approach ' importance such as the Newport -Inglewood Fault. Alquist-Priolo special study zones within or near the project site will also be noted. Significant constraints and mitigations, if any, will be identified as needed. Any soils studies available from the applicant will be incorporated if ' appropriate (e.g., Cambro, Sharp projects, etc.) The proposed McDonnell Centre Business Park is located in an area of the City which has previously been graded -and developed. The project is therefore not expected to pose serious issues with regard to earth resources. However, future development within the plan ' area could require grading in some areas. Any sensitive areas for future grading operations within the plan area will be identified. Issues of subsidence and stability during construction, based upon information obtained from the City's Department of Building and Safety (e.g., t retaining walls, etc.) will receive particular attention. The limitations, if any, which these conditions place on future development of the plan area will then be noted. Other mitigation measures will be proposed to incorporate the recommendations of the appropriate Agency ' departments and other City departments as required. (2) Air Quality Air quality may rival the issues of transportation and traffic congestion in terms of ' regional environmental sensitivity. The Team is currently working very closely with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) staff members to develop an understanding and to define ' expectations for the reduction of pollutant emissions. We will prepare an air quality analysis for three land use scenarios consisting of the following components: • &egulatory Setting, which will discuss all pertinent air quality statutes and regulations, including national Ambient Air Quality Standards and the Regional Air ' Quality Management Plan (AQMP); • _ xisting Air Quality Conditions, including regional meteorology and local conditions as measured at the SCAQMD North Coast Orange County location, Source Receptor Area 18 (previously Costa Mesa). • Construction Emissions, including emissions from construction equipment, carthmoving operations, construction worker and delivery trips and the application of architectural coatings and building materials which release volatile organic compounds (VOCs). All emissions will be calculated on a daily and quarterly basis. • Regional Mobile Source Emissions, including quantification of emissions from project -generated traffic, using regional travel characteristic data obtained from SCAG and the SCAQMD and the EMFAC7F1.1 emission factor model. City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnett Centre Business Park Page 13 April 25. 1996 Revised Approach • Regional Stationa Source Emissions, consisting of quantification of emissions from electricity production and natural gas consumption. • Local Mobile Source Emissions, consisting of analysis of traffic impact on localized ' carbon monoxide concentrations in terms of exceeding Federal and State ambient one -hour and eight -hour carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations at three (3) receptor locations, with and without the impact of project development, utilizing the CALINE ' 4 model. Additional locations may be optionally modeled, for a time and materials fee. • Conformityith the Regional Air Quality Management, Plan (AOMP), conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth by SCAG. All quantitative analyses will be conducted in accordance to procedures set forth by the California Air Resources Board and the SCAQMD and compared to the significance thresholds established by SCAQMD or, in the case of CO, the 1-hour and 8-hour ambient air quality ' standards. Mitigation measures will be proposed in response to conclusions of significant project impacts. Mitigation measures for air quality and traffic impacts are closely related. PCR will coordinate mitigation programs with existing and anticipated City policies with respect to trip reduction techniques and guidelines and with other mitigation programs in effect near the project site, as applicable. (3) Drainage ' The McDonnell Centre Business Park site has previously been graded and developed. However, future development associated with the buildout of the plan area to the projected ' buildout could affect drainage patterns within the plan area by changing the existing topography through grading and by increasing the amount of impervious surface on a development site. ' PCR will review previous studies of the area, as well as the Flood Control Plan of the County Flood Control District to determine the existing and proposed status of the storm drainage system. The existing City -operated storm drain system will also be analyzed. Flood ' Hazard Maps from the National Flood Insurance Program will be reviewed to establish the Flood Hazard Zone designations within the plan area. Areas of potential flooding will be ' identified. PCR will work with the County Flood Control District and the City of Huntington Beach Department of Public Works to identify the appropriate mitigation programs which need to apply to future development within the plan area. Such programs will likely include the ' requirement for site -specific hydrology and drainage studies for projects located within any designated flood hazard areas. ' City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park page 14 April 25, 1996 1. Revised Approach (4) Water/Natural Resources/Energy Impacts PCR will also review existing information regarding the nature of groundwater supplies ' and water quality. This information will be analyzed to the determine the effect, if any, implementation of the proposed entitlement program would have on the groundwater system, including the proposed City well included within the north central portion of the plan area. ' Criteria will be developed to determine the areas, if any, where future development could potentially affect underground aquifers and/or the proposed City well. Mitigation requirements, ' most likely in the form of requirements for future hydrologic studies on sites located in sensitive areas for any groundwater resources identified from the analysis discussed above, will be developed. (5) Agriculture ' The proposed Specific Plan area appears to have previously been utilized for agriculture. We will identify and map any areas under cultivation on the property or in the surrounding ' areas per a literature review, inquiries and an air photo exam. This review will incorporate existing information regarding any existing farmland and/or soil types potentially valuable for agriculture on the Specific Plan site including the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) ' Important Farmland Inventory (IFI) and the U.S. Soil Conservation Service. Further, PCR will determine whether any local plans call for the preservation of agriculture associated with the Specific Plan property or, through inquiries to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, whether any ' farmland on the Specific Plan property is protected under the Williamson Act. (6) Noise PCR will analyze the potential ambient noise impacts associated with the proposed ' project by calculating the anticipated noise levels to be encountered both within the Specific Plan area and in the surrounding area. These impacts will be compared to the existing ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Specific Plan area site to determine the impacts of construction ' and traffic. In order to establish a baseline for noise analyses, PCR will undertake a noise monitoring program at three (3) locations in the vicinity of the proposed Specific Plan area. ' Existing important noise sources in the Specific Plan area include background noise from such bordering roadways as Rancho Road, Bolsa Avenue, Bolsa Chica Street, and Springdale Street, as well as the nearby rail lines. ' Temporary noise impacts from construction to buildout condition will be discussed in terms of information on generalized construction schedules and equipment utilization. Potential 1 ' City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 15 April 25. 1996 I CJ 0 1 1 I. Revised Approach construction noise sources will be identified and distance -based attenuation estimates used to project impacts to the surrounding uses. Noise impacts will be evaluated relative to the past -construction occupancy and operation of the program, as well as the noise impacts associated with project related incremental increases in vehicular traffic. PCR will model noise impacts using the appropriate models, which incorporate Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) noise modeling measures and criteria, customized to reflect local conditions. The impacts of noise generated by the proposed program on ambient noise levels and on three (3) sensitive receptors in the surrounding area will then be evaluated, for both construction and operational phases, in consideration of applicable noise standards. Appropriate mitigation measures will be proposed for any significant noise impacts of the project. (7) Light & Glare We will review the existing conditions in the immediate project vicinity with regard to reflective light and nighttime illumination. While the specific building parameters -associated with the projected future buildout are not known at this time, the broad nature of the light and glare impacts of buildout can be determined from the land use controls which will be established to govern development within the Specific Plan area. In addition, any local areas of particular sensitivity to light and glare will be identified. If standards can be established by the City through the entitlement program and MEIR process, imposition of standards on an ad hoc, project -by -project basis will be avoided in the future, thereby guiding and facilitating future development. A general description of potential light and glare impacts at key locations within the plan area which could result from the projected buildout will also be provided. Mitigation measures, if required, will be consistent with City policies. (S) Land Use The PCRIPCA Team will provide the analysis for issues related to land use. The McDonnell Centre Business Park project site, located within the City of Huntington Beach, is currently developed at a relatively low intensity. Implementation of the proposed entitlement program for the area may increase land use intensity on the project site. The growth implications of the projected buildout will be evaluated in order to determine whether they are compatible with the goals, objectives and policies of the City of Huntington Beach General Plan and the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide to determine consistency with land use designations and policies. Overall, the assessment of the planning and land use issues will consist of three major components: (1) the relationship with the existing land use regulations, City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park page 16 April 25. 1996 ' I. Revised Approach (2) compatibility of existing land uses within the plan area and (3) compatibility of the proposed land uses within the plan area with existing and projected land uses in surrounding areas. The impact of development strategies in improving circulation and linkages, the economic climate and quality of life perceptions of the study area will be important components of this analysis. Development of area -wide mitigation programs, if appropriate, will be included in this evaluation. Population, (9) Housing and Employment ' Analyses of population, housing and employment impacts for the proposed McDonnell Centre Business Park entitlement program will be provided. When built out to the projected level based upon the allowed land uses and densities, the plan area may contain a range of land uses, potentially including residential, commercial and industrial. This anticipated growth may result in increases in population, housing units and employment within the plan area. ' Background data will be collected from numerous sources, including the 1990 U.S. Census, SCAG forecasts (as contained in the Growth Management Element of the Regional Comprehensive Plan), U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, California Departments of Finance and Employment Development, DAMAR Inc. (housing sales) and growth estimates prepared by others (including the Center for the Continuing Study of the California Economy and Urban Decision Systems). If the development program allowed under the project's Specific Plan includes residential ' land uses, the anticipated increase in population and the expected characteristics of this population will be calculated based on the projections of household size within the plan area and buildout of the proposed development program. This will be done both in gross terms and net of existing population so that both the gross and marginal effects of buildout can be assessed. These estimates of population growth and growth rates will be compared against SCAG's forecasts of population growth within the subregion in which the plan area is located. The forecast year used in the analysis will be a function of the timing of anticipated development within the study area. Buildout of the project site may also impact the amount and type of housing located within the boundaries of the study area. PCR will describe housing stock and housing trends, including numbers of housing units by type, tenure, vacancy rates, housing costs and housing condition. The relationship between proposed and existing housing stock within the study area will also be analyzed. Projected housing growth will be compared against SCAG forecasts and housing needs assessments for the subregion. The extent to which development of the plan area ' helps to meet the City's housing need goals will be highlighted. Mitigation programs which City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 17 April 25, 1996 1 I. Revised Approach establish area -wide standards with regard to affordable housing will be recommended. The applicable City policies with regard to affordable housing will be reflected in the recommended programs. ' PCR will also quantify the total employment and types of jobs to be generated within the plan area at buildout, based upon standard square footage per employee factors. These estimates will be compared against regional forecasts of employment growth within the SCAG subregion in which the plan area is located. The employment impacts of future development ' will also be discussed in terms of City economic development objectives. (10) Traffic RKJK will prepare the traffic study for the project which will include analysis and evaluation of 19 intersections in the vicinity of the Specific Plan area which are most likely to ' be affected by project -related growth. This will involve field review of existing conditions within the study area, including land configurations and traffic controls, obtaining A.M./P.M. ' peak hour traffic counts and calculating existing levels of service using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. Trip generation and distribution to surrounding roadways will be determined in conjunction with the City's traffic engineer, as will the assumed background traffic growth rate (estimated to be 2%-3% based upon preliminary discussions with the City). The traffic analysis will then evaluate projected traffic impacts for the future without project (5 years of cumulative background growth plus approved projects) and future with project (cumulative plus project) conditions for three land use scenarios at the 19 study intersections. Evaluation of significant impacts will be in accordance with the City's criteria. Traffic ' improvements necessary to meet minimum City level of service standards will be identified to address the significant impacts of the project and the projected effects of such improvements on the level of service of impacted intersections. RKJK will also determine traffic projections ' with and without the project at the 19 study area intersections using the RKJK Tranplan Model and identify buildout traffic improvements required, including additional lanes, access control, traffic control measures and other features as necessary. The results of the traffic study will be included in a traffic report which will be provided to the City for review and in the Draft MEIR as a Technical Appendix when approved by the City. (11) Public Services The project site is Iocated within an urbanized setting with developed networks of public services. PCR will identify the service providers for the Specific Plan area and, in coordination ' with these service providers, will provide an inventory of existing public facilities and services. ' City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park April 25. 1996 Page 18 1 9 1 i 1� 1.1 I. Revised Approach An assessment of proposed entitlement program impacts upon the delivery of fire, police, park, school and library services in this area of the City of Huntington Beach will be presented. This inventory of existing public facilities and services will include an assessment of existing demand, level of service, and the quantity, adequacy and location of facilities serving the proposed project site. Assessments of the adequacy of facilities and levels of service will be based upon the judgment of the service provider. Mitigation measures will be developed as required consistent with the policies and programs of the City and other public service providers. Mitigation programs could include development of mechanisms to identify future service needs resulting from future growth within the Specific Plan area as well as programs to ensure that these needs are adequately financed. (12) Utilities The Study Area is located within an urbanized setting with developed infrastructure systems. Utility providers in the area will be identified and through coordination with them, we will provide an inventory of existing utility services. An assessment of both proposed project and cumulative growth impacts upon the water, wastewater, solid waste, electrical and natural gas infrastructure in this area of the City will be presented. This inventory of existing infrastructure will include an assessment of existing demand, and the quantity, adequacy and location of facilities serving the proposed project site. Assessments of the adequacy of existing infrastructure will reflect the judgments of the service providers. PCR will estimate the projected demand for these services and evaluate, in conjunction with the utility providers, the capacity of existing infrastructure to accommodate future growth within the specific plan area. The need for additional infrastructure will be established, if any. Incorporation of conservation technologies and/or use restrictions will be discussed. City and other service providers policies and programs will be reviewed and mitigation measures consistent with these programs recommended, if appropriate. (13) Urban Design Urban design is a composite issue that cuts across a wide array of environmental topics including land use compatibility, traffic/circulation, light and glare, etc. Accordingly, aspects of urban design will be addressed within those issue areas and will not be duplicated in this section. However, this sub -section will permit certain issues to be addressed which may not get attention in other sections, such as the aesthetic and visual issues, the character and role of the public realm, and transitions in scale between uses and properties. City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park page 19 April 25, 1996 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 h 1 Alternatives I. Revised Approach CEQA requires the consideration of alternatives to proposed projects. The PCR/PCA Team proposes to utilize the alternatives analysis process mandated by CEQA in a creative manner to support the flexible implementation of the development allowed under the project's Specific Plan. Previously, the PCR/PCA Team had proposed to fully evaluate three land use scenarios in the project EIR in order to test the equivalency envelope for the project. This approach has been modified in this Supplemental Proposal to provide for evaluation of alternative land use strategies for the proposed Specific Plan within the Alternatives section of the EIR. Because of the existing pattern of land uses in this area of the City, it may be appropriate to include consideration of residential uses in the Specific Plan in this section of the EIR rather than as part of the development program allowed under the Specific Plan. The Team will evaluate up to three (3) alternatives to the proposed project plus the mandatory no - project alternative will also be considered in this section of the EIR. The fee indicated in this proposal is based on an analysis of a total of four alternatives. Consideration of any further alternatives which may be required will require modifications to the project budget. General Impacts We will prepare the following CEQA-required sections within this chapter of the MEIR: (1) Relationship between Local Short -Term Uses and Long -Term Productivity; (2) Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes; and (3) Growth -Inducing Impacts. Task 3 Products: 1. Preliminary Draft MEIR 2. Public Draft MEIR 3. Preliminary Final MEIR/Response to Comments 4. Public/Final MEIR/Response to Comments 5. Mitigation Monitoring Program 6. Technical Studies TASK 4.0. STAFF AND PUBLIC MEETINGS, WORKSHOPS AND HEARINGS We anticipate the Specific Plan/EIR process to include the following meetings during the approximately 9-month project period: City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: hic0onnell Centre Business Park page 20 April 25. 1996 0 I. Revised Approach 4.1 MEIR Scoping Meeting (1) 4.2 Community Meetings (1) 4.3 Workshops/Meeting at Planning Commission (1) 4.4 Workshops/Meeting at City Council (1) 4.5 Staff/Team Meetings (6) 4.6 Ongoing staff/team liaison and coordination 4.1 MEIR Scoping Meeting (1) As also noted in Task I.1, prior to initiation of MEIR preparation, the PCR/PCA Team, working closely with City staff, will conduct a scoping meeting to hear community perspectives on which issues need to be addressed in the entitlement program and the MEIR. This meeting will be facilitated by senior PCR/PCA Team and City staff in a format to be developed in Task 3 activities and should be held in conjunction with the Notice of Preparation public circulation process. The meeting could be tape recorded and transcribed. Costs of transcription are not included in this proposal and are assumed to be borne by the City. The Team will produce a scoping report for staff review and inclusion in the Draft MEIR with the Initial Study. 4.2 Community Meetings (1) Community outreach is important to assure success of a project of this magnitude and ' importance to Huntington Beach. A community meeting, possibly held during the public review period for the MEIR, to be coordinated in an organized yet informal format is budgeted. We ' will work closely with staff to identify the most appropriate and useful timing, location and strategies for this meeting. 4.3 Workshop/Meeting at Planning Commission (1) ' Once the MEIR is completed, the public review process will begin. While it is difficult to predict the time frame requirements for public review, we have budgeted participation in one workshop/public hearing with the Planning Commission. The workshop will introduce Commissioners to the Specific Plan and MEIR and their key features. The study session could be a joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting if staff and decision -makers so recommend. Alternatively, a public hearing, either during and after the mandated CEQA ' review period could be held prior to Commission recommendation to the City Council. We assume that staff will lead these efforts, with the PCR/PCA Team playing a support role. 1 City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park page 21 April 25. 1996 I 1. Revised Approach 4.4 Workshop/Meetings at City Council (1) A similar process to that described above in 4.3 is proposed for the City Council. One workshop and/or public hearing is budgeted. Should the City elect to have a joint Planning Commission/Council workshop, the Council stand alone workshop could either be eliminated or provide the opportunity for two workshop sessions or a stand alone public hearing. 4.5 Staff/Team Meetings (6) Meetings between City staff, team management and technical staff (as required) are proposed to facilitate ongoing communications and expedite the process. Six (6) meetings are budgeted, spaced throughout the project accelerated schedule. 4.6 Ongoing staff/team liaison and coordination The PCR/PCA Team is committed to close coordination with City staff through regular informal communication and the use of the Team's three Orange County offices. In addition, our extensive electronic communications internal and external network (high speed modems, Internet addresses, etc.) allows for rapid and easy communication of voice and data. This capability will assist the PCR/PCA Team to fulfill the desired adjunct staff role with the City. In addition, past experience of PCR principal Greg Vail and other team members in working with Huntington Beach and surrounding jurisdictions staff should add a special level of comfort and ease to this important project component. Task 4 Products; 1. MEIR Scoping Meeting (1) 2. Community Meetings (1) 3. Workshop/Meeting at Planning Commission (1) 4. Workshop/Meeting at City Council (1) 5. Staff/Team Meetings (6) City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 22 April 25, 1996 ll. Revised Budget Proposal for MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AND MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT • n II. REVISED BUDGET The estimated cost to complete the revised scope of work outlined in Section I of this Supplemental Proposal is $209,520, including labor and direct costs. A summary of the estimated cost by task is shown in Table 1 on page 24. PCR will be the entity with whom the City would contract for services connected with this project. PCR will administer the sub- contracts of each of the other participating firms. The RFP indicates that the City desires to contract for a fixed fee amount for review and finalization of the proposed Specific Plan of the entitlement program and preparation of the Master Environmental Impact Report. While PCR is prepared to work with the City to this end, the City should be aware that substantial uncertainties may exist, with respect to both ' Specific Plan preparation and the EIR process. The outcome of this process can be expected to be dependent upon factors which are beyond the control of either the City or the PCR/PCA Team and will ultimately determine the requirements which the Team will be called upon to support. With respect to the revised approach contained within this Supplemental Proposal, required revisions to the proposed Specific Plan (if any) will be dependent not only upon the results of the review of the draft Specific Plan by the City and the PCR/PCA Team, but also upon the willingness of the property owner to accept potential revisions. An ongoing process may be required before final resolution of issues raised during the City/Team review process can be effected. For budgeting purposes, the PCR/PCA Team has established an allowance of $45,000 for Task 2.0 (Specific Plan Revisions). This amount could be allocated to PCR/PCA Team firms, in whole or in part, depending upon the required revisions to the Specific Plan identified by the City. In the event the cost to revise the Specific Plan is less than this allowance amount, only the actual costs incurred will be billed. If the cost exceeds the allowance, the PCR/PCA Team would propose to meet expeditiously with the City to identify equitable solutions for all parties. The magnitude of the cost associated with potential revisions will be clarified to a greater extent after the City has completed its review of the draft Specific Plan (completion of Task 1.0). In addition, as discussed in the revised work scope, the preparation of the Draft and Final MORS and Responses to Comments are subject to such variables as level of public City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 23 April 25, 1996 0 0 IL Revised Budget Table 1 McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK - HUNTINGTON BEACH REVISED ESTIMATED COST 1.0. Review Draft Specific Plan 2.0: Specific Plan Revisions (optional) 3.0. Environmental Impact Report 4.0: Meetings and Hearings TOTAL: $2,850 I $15,000 $4,000 $21,850 - $45,000* $101,320 $22.800 $124,120 $10,550 $5,000 I $1,000 1 $2,000 $18,550 $114,720 1 $20,00 07$510 00 $24,800 $209,820 I Note: Because the scope of work for this task will not be known until the completion of Task 1.0, an allowance of $45,000 has been established which could be available to allocate 10 Team firms, in whole or in part, depending upon the required revisions to the Specific Plan identified by the City. City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 24 April 25, 1996 II. Revised Budget scrutiny of the project, reactions of the surrounding neighborhoods and general economic and ' social conditions in the City and surrounding communities and thus have been budgeted with allowances of staff time reflective of the expected response. Similarly, printing budgets are in large part a function of document length, which cannot be accurately predicted at this time. Accordingly, the proposed budgets include printing allowances of $4,000 for all Draft MEIR iterations, and $5,000 for all Final MEIR iterations. Actual printing costs may be higher or lower. PCR will confer with City staff regarding printing costs as the magnitude is becoming cleat' and will only charge actual costs. As an equitable alternative to a pure fixed price ' approach, to both the City and the PCR/PCA Team, PCR would propose that, should any task for which allowances have been made require less than the allowance, PCR will not bill the balances. Similarly, should they require more than the budgeted amount, the balances will be t billed, with the advance concurrence of the City, on a time and materials basis. Alternatively, through the anticipated close coordination between PCR and the City, revised budget amounts can be agreed upon in advance, should the scope of work need to change substantially as a ' result of City or public input and review. Mutually agreed -upon modifications can be made at the time of contract award, should they be required. ' We believe the costs presented in this Supplemental Proposal accurately reflect the level of effort which will be required to address the known technical issues which are discussed in ' the proposal. We do, however, believe that an ongoing process with City staff and the project development team may be appropriate to refine expectations and associated scope, products, schedule and cost throughout the environmental review process. If we can establish a scope of work that is clear with respect to required effort and staff time, the PCR/PCA Team is prepared to agree to a fixed fee. 1 Proposal Validity Period ' This Supplemental Proposal, as well as the PCR/PCA Team's original Proposal, shall remain valid until June 1, 1996. ' City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 25 April 25, 1996 III. Revised Schedule Proposa I for McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AN❑ MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 7 III. REVISED SCHEDULE The City has requested an accelerated schedule of work. The PCRIPCA Team proposes to complete the revised scope of work in keeping with this goal by preparing the environmental documentation expeditiously following completion of the Specific Plan. Assuming a reasonably expedited review process on the part of the City, we believe that the revised work program can be accomplished in approximately 9.5 months. The allocation of tasks over the project time frame is illustrated in the revised schedule on the following page. The revised schedule allows approximately 2.5 months for review and revision of the draft Specific Plan and approximately 7 months for preparation and completion of the environmental documentation. Preparation of the Draft MEIR is proposed to be initiated immediately upon completion of the Specific Plan. In the event the process of finalizing the Specific Plan requires less than the indicated allocation, the overall process can be completed in correspondingly less time. City of Huntington Beach Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 26 April 25, 1996 111. Revised Schedule McDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK - HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROXIMATE SCHEDULE FOR ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM AND MEIR Mnnth-; Finnsed SPS/REOIRED AION A Task 1: Review of Draft Specific Plan IS Task 2: Specific Plan Revisions (Optional) I i I# Task 3: Ma'' 1 0 ster Environmenta Impact Rep rt Data Collection .... ......... Notice of Preparation -0u_6[W_Sco.p.6n_g. Workshop 7' 1 1-1— V rI i J I 4� 'i 1 Impact_ A@i- � ; � � � 1 _j Draft MfEIR' • Dra_ftRespo­n'se to _Comrne_nt5 Mitigation Ki-on Ftorr�n6 Program '_' Final VOR M, Task 4: Meetings, Hearings & Public Review Periods NOP Public Review W1 S VE I R Public Rev i c w City of Hunfinglon Beach Supplemental Proposal re: McDonnell Centre Business Park Page 27 LEGEND: PCR I Pr -A Team Staff Mertinal­s! City Review Workshop; Nblir Comment llefiod= Planning Consultants Research/Planning Company Associates April 25, 1996 nI Appendix A: Patricia Smith, ASLA %j Proposal for MCDONNELL CENTRE BUSINESS PARK SPECIFIC PLAN AND MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Patra Smith, ASLA Plan -rung ■ Urban Design • Landscape Architecture FIRM QUALIFICATIONS • 3919 C1aylon Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 ■ Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 ' 0 Pat0 ricia Smith, ASLA Planning .Urban Design . Landscape ArchitectureSummary of Services Patricia Smith, ASLA provides a wide range of services in the areas of planning, urban design and landscape architecture, as well as development planning and construction management. Pat Smith is a licensed landscape architect in the State of California and has 20 years experience in planning and development management for private and public sector clients. Services provided by the firm include the following. ' City and Town Planning • Specific Plans • General Plans * Master Plans • Streetscape and Urban Design ' Environmental Planning • Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) for CEQA compliance • Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) for NEPA compliance * Land suitability analyses for "best -fit" land planning Land Planning • Coordination and management of site planning and development approval processes Asset Management • Working with an economic consultant, evaluation of the optimum use of land or building resources and formulation of a corresponding development strategy Development Planning and Construction Management • Entitlements - general plan consistency, zoning, subdivision approval and building permit coordination • Master planning and development strategies, e.g., phasing • Architect/engineer selection and coordination • Coordination of legal requirements - CC&Rs, State subdivision approvals, long-term financing options • Bid, negotiation and contractor selection • Owner's representative during construction ' Residential Garden Design Design and optional installation/construction of: i • Plant materials • Irrigation, including drip irrigation • Hardscape - patios, walkways, etc. ' Garden structures - decks, arbors, fences, stairs, etc. ' 3919 Clavton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning - Urban Design - Landscape Architecture Specific Plans, Master Plans and Urban Design Plans Pat Smith has worked with both local jurisdictions and private developers to prepare plans that achieve community objectives and, at the same time, maximize flexibility for development projects that must meet those objectives.. Over the years she has prepared specific plans, general plans and master in a variety of ' formats that respond to the particular requirements of the local jurisdictions and that often include implementation mechanisms, such as zoning ordinances and CC&Rs . Plans prepared by Pat Smith are designed for ease of use by both developers and review agencies; they are focused, succinct, and rely on a balance of text and graphic illustrations to convey their intent. Most of the plans include streetscape and urban design components that are integral to the overall planning effort. Mission Street and Blue Line Station Specific Plan and EIR, South Pasadena. The Mission Street Specific Plan and Blue Line Station Concept Design, currently being prepared by Pat Smith, will guide development and land use in the vicinity of the future light rail station and along Mission Street, South Pasadena's historic "Main Street." The light rail station, scheduled for construction in the next few years, will be located in the heart of the city's historic downtown district along the Blue Line that will run from Long Beach to Pasadena via downtown Los Angeles. The plan's intent is to take advantage of both transit access as a catalyst for economic development and the small-town, pedestrian -oriented character of the Historic District as the focus for that development. The plan, prepared under the guidance of a 25- member task force representing property owners, business owners and residents, will define: • A market niche and economic development strategy. • A mix and intensity of land uses that is compatible with transit service and with the historic, small- town character of the district; uses to be considered include vertical mixed use (residential and office above retail), cottage industry in existing small-scale warehouse facilities, as well as convenience and specialty retail and services and office space. • A parking and access plan/program that accommodates demand generated by transit and takes advantage of shared parking opportunities without undermining the pedestrian character of the area. • Public improvements needed to support the economic development, land use and parking strategies; 1 • Development standards and design guidelines for historic preservation, new construction and public improvements, including streetscape and parking facilities. • Short- and long-term implementation programs. Transit -Served Community Development Standards, Sterling Forest, New York. As a consultant to Sedway Cooke Associates, Pat Smith formulated a series of development standards to implement a new community that will accommodate 35,000 residents on 25% of a 17,500-acre site. The remaining 75% will ' be preserved as open space. Residential development will be clustered in a series of hamlets, each with a commercial and community center within walking distance of most homes in the hamlet. Office, R & D, and light industrial development will be concentrated along a scenic corridor in which such uses have already been established. A jobs -housing balance will be achieve through the development of housing at ' prices that are matched to the salary levels of projected jobs. A mixed -use center, including a pedestrian - oriented "Main Street", will serve as the commercial and social focus of the community. The community will be served by a local jitney system that links hamlets and commercial areas to one another and to the ' nearby commuter rail station that connects to New York City. A single set of standards was designed to interface with the existing standards of the three towns in which the community is located. The standards address permanent open space, roadway design, housing design, commercial development design, and utilities. Urban Design and Development Concepts for Transit -Served "Targeted Growth Areas", Los Angeles. With Sedway Cooke Associates, Pat Smith prepared a series of urban design investigations and ' corresponding development standards and design guidelines for transit -served areas that will be designated by the City's new General Plan Framework to accommodate the majority of all future development (95% of all new commercial development and 75% of all new housing). The purpose of the new standards and guidelines is to 1) create financial incentives to attract developers to TGAs and 2) produce a physical and social context that will attract residents and businesses to them. I- 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 - Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 _ Pat is Smith, ASLA Planning . Urban Design . Landscape Architecture Specific Plans, Master Plans and Urban Design Plans Page 2 As a basis for formulating standards and guidelines appropriate to the physical, social and cultural characteristics, economic realities and regulatory framework of the city, a series of "investigations" of Targeted Growth Areas was prepared: • Building and site characteristics, providing the basis for financial incentives and zoning code revisions; • Area -wide characteristics, identifying critical public improvements and urban design elements; ' Design characteristics, identifying critical building and site design elements that should be incorporated into new development projects. Urban Form/Transit System Evaluation, Los Angeles. LWith Sedway Cooke Associates, Pat Smith evaluated the relationship of LACMTA's long-range fixed rail transit plan to the city's existing and planned development and activity pattern. The study evaluated the ' relationship of the proposed transit system to the following factors: • Major existing and proposed employment centers • Existing concentrations of multi -family housing • Existing commercial and cultural activity centers • Designated centers, redevelopment areas and enterprise zones. ' The evaluation addressed the effectiveness of the proposed transit system (including alternative routes on some corridors) to serve existing and proposed concentrations of activity, to connect jobs and housing, and to provide mobility to transit -dependent neighborhoods. Hollywood Community Plan, Los Angeles. The Hollywood Community Plan (prepared by Pat Smith in 1987 while at Gruen Associates and adopted in 1988), an element of the City's General Plan, revised the original plan that was adopted in 1973. The primary objectives of the plan are as follows: • Accommodate projected population for the year 2010; • Provide an appropriate mix of conveniently located retail and service uses to support that population; • Identify transportation and other public facility improvements needed to accommodate that population and to support permitted non-residential development and regional through traffic; • Establish the foundation for concentrating future development around fixed rail transit stations at established community centers (station locations had not been established at the time). ' The intent of the plan is to provide the foundation for balancing transportation and public facility improvements with land development on an incremental basis through a subsequent Transportation Specific Plan and the city's capital improvement program. In addition, the plan will preserve and enhance existing neighborhoods, focus future development around pedestrian -oriented neighborhood centers and facilitate use of public transportation. The Hollywood Community Plan was prepared in close cooperation with the City Council Office and members of the community. Numerous focus groups ' were held with representatives of homeowners associations, major property owners and business people. Large-scale day -long and evening workshops were held throughout the community at key points in the planning process, each attracting hundreds of residents. The plan was widely supported and was adopted by City Council less than a year after its completion, with virtually no revisions. ' Westwood Village Specific Plan, Los Angeles. The City of Los Angeles' Westwood Village Specific Plan, prepared in 1985 by Pat Smith while she was at Gruen Associates and adopted in 1988, replaces the plan prepared by Gruen Associates in the early 1970's. Westwood Village is a concentrated, pedestrian - oriented retail and shopping district adjacent to both high density housing and high-rise office development. It will be served by the MTA Red Line (subway) in the future. The plan revision attempted ' 3919 Clavion Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 Patricia Smith ASLA Planning . Urban Design a Landscape Architecture ' Specific Plans, Master Plans and Urban Design Plans Page 3 to resolve conflicts among commercial property owners and tenants, adjacent residential neighborhoods, the University of California at Los Angeles, and the City of Los Angeles over land use and development intensity. Extensive community involvement was essential to the adoption of the balance. The new ' Specific Plan addresses not only new concerns regarding land use and intensity, but the entire spectrum of issues that faced Westwood Village in the mid- 1980's, "including the need for economic development efforts to attract new businesses to counteract the area's decline. In addition to refining the existing plan's land use ,controls, the revised plan addresses cultural resource preservation, building height, retail use ' mix provision of . validated centralized parking, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, streetscape improvements, and design/signage guidelines. In addition to the regulatory plan requested by the City, the Westwood Village Specific Plan goes on to sets forth an implementation and economic development ' strategy which includes a public parking structure, streetscape improvements and a management entity to provide coordinated advertising, leasing, events, transportation demand management, and validated parking. The management entity was established by Westwood Village in the early 1990s. ' Urban Design Component of the Community Plan Revision Program, Los Angeles. In association with Gruen Associates, Pat Smith is working with the Department of Planning's Urban Design staff to develop Citywide and community -specific development standards and design guidelines. The underlying goal of the Urban Design Element of the General Plan is to improve the quality of the built environment in Los Angeles. It will identify basic design requirements for public improvements, site planning and building design. A key objective is to develop design standards which, in conjunction with transportation improvements, will permit higher density housing where appropriate in the city. Five Community Plan areas were addressed in the first three years. Streetscape Improvement Program, Beverly Hills Triangle. While at Gruen Associates, Pat Smith managed the conceptual design and planning phase of the City of Beverly Hill's streetscape improvement program for its central commercial district, including Rodeo Drive. The design concept developed under her direction was for a simple, elegant set of design elements which tie the area together and serve as a backdrop for shops and shoppers. The design concept avoided the common pitfall of over -designed ' streetscape elements which overwhelm their surroundings and are too expensive to be supported by property and business owners. It included not just physical improvements but activities, management and land -use concerns. The recommended program consisted of three components: short-term enhancements including directories and signage, planters, flower boxes and baskets, pedestrian -scale lighting, tree grates, street furniture and limited use of special paving (with optional enhancements by individual developers); longer -term improvements including redesign of streets to increase pedestrian spaces, pedestrian connections across Wilshire Boulevard, municipal parking structures with restaurant courtyards, focal elements (fountains and sculpture), and gateway treatments; and management concerns including coordinated promotion, maintaining a balanced mix of uses, introduction of anchor uses, maintenance, and special events. Sterling Homes Specific Plan and EIR, Oceanside. This Specific Plan, prepared by Pat Smith while at Gruen Associates, establishes the physical planning and development framework for replacing 647 substandard Marine Corps housing units with 650 to 700 market -rate housing units and a neighborhood shopping center on a 58-acre site near downtown Oceanside. The Specific Plan defined key development parameters including: land use mix and density, vehicular access and the primary circulation pattern, the open space concept, and the distribution of responsibility for infrastructure improvements between the public and private sectors, as well as site planning and design guidelines. The plan included a density bonus program that allowed additional housing units in exchange for optional recreational amenities and landscape improvements. An Environmental Impact Report, in conformance with CEQA guidelines, was prepared to accompany the Specific Plan. The plan was implemented within a few years of its adoption. 1 , • 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 • Phone 213 665 194C Fax 213 665 6790 I 0 Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning - Urban Design - Landscape Architecture Streetscape Improvements The following projects prepared by Pat Smith and described contain significant streetscape improvement components: • Mission Street Specific Plan, South Pasadena • Sterling Forest Development Standards, New York • Beverly Hills Triangle Streetscape Improvement Program • Westwood Village Specific Plan, Los Angeles In addition, the following projects were directed primarily at the design of streetscape improvements: Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative (LAND Demonstration Projects. As a member of the LANI Collaborative, rat Smith provides technical assistance to the commercial districts selected for funding of transit -related streetscape improvements and other economic development programs through the Mayor's office. Through community -based planning in each selected district, LANI will initially support streetscape improvements such as bus shelters, street lighting and trees, and other street furniture to support transit use, improve the appearance and assist in the economic revitalization of the eight demonstration areas, located primarily in central Los Angeles. Subsequent efforts will be more comprehensive in nature. Whittier Boulevard Development Plan, Montebello. This plan, prepared in part by Pat Smith while at Gruen Associates, was undertaken in association with Economics Research Associates. It defines a strategy for enhancing the two-mile linear redevelopment area. The plan, identifies development strategies and public improvements, including expanded centralized parking, streetscape improvements and activity nodes to enhance the boulevard's potential as a shopping street. ■ 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 - Phone 213 665 1940 F'ax 213 665 6790 'I NA i M IAO- 17-1 ,„I m • Patricia Smith ASLA Planning a Urban Design . Landscape Architecture ' Environmental Planning P and Impact Assessments Wilshire Center/Koreatown Recovery Area Alternatives and EIR, Los Angeles. For Gruen Associates, Pat Smith prepared a land use survey and formulated a series of alternatives to be evaluated by the Wilshire Center/Koreatown Recovery Area EIR. The EIRs are being prepared prior to the formulation of land use plans and development strategies and, therefore, will assist the Community Redevelopment Agency and local community in selecting appropriate development strategies and land use plans. The alternatives reflect variations in: ' • The total amount of development; The mix and intensity of land uses by sub -areas (traffic analysis zones) and in, in some cases, by parcels; • The location of development, particularly in relation to subway stations that are currently under ' construction; • Urban forth, including a comparison between pedestrian -oriented retail with housing above (mixed use) and strip mall. rThe proposed alternatives were developed with input from the Community Advisory Committee (CAC). The alternatives were presented to the CAC and discussed at one meeting and were approved at the following meeting. Westlake Recovery Area EIR Land Use Survey and Alternatives, Los Angeles. Pat Smith prepared a detailed laud use survey and formulated a series of alternatives to be evaluated by the Wilshire ' Center/Koreatown Recovery Area EIR. The land use survey documents existing building area by land use by city block as a basis for developing the alternatives and evaluating their impacts. In particular, the analysis will provide additional insight into the over -crowding issue. The alternatives reflect variations in the total amount of development; the mix and intensity of land uses by sub -areas (traffic analysis zones) ' and in, in some cases, by parcels; and the location of development, particularly in relation to subway stations that are currently under construction. ' Sterling Forest Community Environmental Impact Statement, New York. With Sedway Cooke Associates, Pat Smith coordinated the preparation of the program EIS for the Sterling Forest Community. She established a format to be used by all members of the consultant team which substantially reduced the need for rewrites and permitted the Draft EIS for the 35,000-resident community on a 17,500 acre site ' to be prepared in nine months. In addition to the land use, community character and community facilities analyses, she prepared a detailed visual analysis which relied on computer modeling and computer/photo montages to evaluate the impact of development on views from the Appalachian Trail ' and other regional trails and highways that pass through the project site. Northwest Relief Route, Santa Fe, New Mexico. At Gruen Associates Pat Smith managed the preparation of the Environmental Document for this transportation corridor designed to relieve traffic congestion in central Santa Fe and to facilitate development permitted by the City's land -use plan in the undeveloped northern portions of the city. In addition to managing the project, coordinating with local jurisdictions, and making public presentations, she prepared key analyses including noise, air quality, biological resource, land use and compatibility with local plans. Route 71, San Bernardino, Riverside and Los Angeles Counties. At Gruen Associates, Pat Smith completed the preparation of a Draft EIS for this freeway project. She was also responsible for noise, air quality, land use and planning analyses, coordination with Caltrans. ' Metro Rail Environmental Impact Statement/Report, Southern California Rapid Transit District. At Sedway Cooke Associates, Pat Smith coordinated the preparation of the EIS/EIR on Southern California's first subway. In addition, she prepared detailed land use and economic development analysis of the ' potential station areas, coordinating with the City and County of Los Angeles. 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 ■ Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 ' Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning . Urban Designs Landscape Architecnue 1 Environmental Planning and Impact Assessments Page 2 Long Beach --Los Angeles Light Rail Environmental Impact Report, Los Angeles County Transportation Commission. Pat Smith managed Sedway Cooke Associates share of a joint effort with Myra L Frank & Associates to prepare the EIR for the first contemporary light rail line constructed in Los ' Angeles. In particular, she prepared the land use, socio-economic and visual impact portions of the EIR. In addition Pat Smith has prepared or managed the preparation of EIRs and environmental assessments in conjunction with many specific plans, community plans and urban design plans, including the following: • Mission Street Specific Plan, South Pasadena • Sterling Homes Specific Plan, Oceanside • Hollywood Commuity Plan, Los Angeles • Westwood Village Specific Plan, Los Angeles 1 1 1 0 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 . Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 ' • Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning a Urban Design a Landscape Archirecture Development and Construction Management Pat Smith was responsible, as Vice President of the USC Real Estate Development Corporation, for all aspects of the University's historic renovation projects and faculty/staff housing development in the ' historic North University Park neighborhood of Los Angeles, as well as planning and entitlements for all off -campus development. Pat Smith was responsible for development planning, entitlements and construction management of the following specific projects. Forthmann House. This Italianate Victorian home, built in 1880 in what is now the downtown area of Los Angeles and designated Cultural Monument 106, was slated for demolition, to be replaced by a parking lot. USC REDC moved the house to its current location three blocks north of the campus in the historic North University Park, restored it, and converted it to office space, including conversion of the attic to a third floor. Extensive coordination with the City of Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety, based on the California State Historic Building Code, was required. The Forthmann House ' currently is occupied by USC Security and a realtor of historic homes in the West Adams community. 2630 Severance Street. This former fraternity house, on the city's historic register, was purchased because of its severely dilapidated condition, which provided the opportunity for improving the neighborhood and adding housing. The original single family home was converted into four student apartments; an addition consisting of two four -bedroom apartments was constructed. Both the rehabilitation and addition maintain the historic character of the building which is transitional between Victorian and Craftsman architecture. McCulloch Townhomes. The McCulloch Townhomes consist of 27 for -sale townhomes and apartments ' over a partially subterranean parking structure on a one -acre site two blocks from USC. The development is located on land owned by the University and leased to the individual homeowners for 99 years, which permits the University to restrict sales to USC faculty and staff. The project is designed as contemporary Craftsman architecture to fit into the eclectic architectural style of the historic North University Park ' neighborhood in which it is located. The McCulloch Townhomes were completed December 1, 1990. All unit had been sold as of September 1, 1991. As project manager Pat Smith directed the planning and design effort; obtained entitlements from the city and state; supervised construction; directed ' development of legal documents including the ground lease, CC&R, and other Homeowners Association documents; and developed the model units and assisted with the marketing program. Courtyards. Located across the street from the McCulloch Townhomes, the Courtyards was designed as 114 for -sale townhomes and apartments and 12 affordable rental apartments. It would be located on land leased to the University from Hebrew Union College, which in turn would be leased to the homebuyers. This project is outside the historic district and more proximate to the University; its architectural style is aligned with that of the early campus, incorporating classical European style with tile roofs, arcades, smooth stucco walls and brick pavers. The Courtyards are scheduled to start construction in June, 1992 and to be built in three or four phases, depending on the absorption rate experienced initially. As project manager Pat Smith was responsible for planning and design, entitlements, and legal aspects of the project, as well as bidding and construction contraction negotiation. jewel Manor. As part of the Courtyards development, USC REDC was required to provide low an and ' moderate income housing for the community. To this end, an existing, deteriorated 21-unit student apartment has been renovated and converted to low-income housing. USC Plaza. For this proposed mixed use (office, hotel, retail and possibly housing) project adjacent to ' the USC campus, Pat Smith coordinated the effort to increase the development capacity of the site from an FAR of 1.5 to 4.5 and directed the master planning effort. I+ 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 • Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m = m = 0 1 1 Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning . Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Residential Gardens Pat Smith's residential garden design practice is, first and foremost, responsive to the needs and objectives of the individual homeowner. Recently she has focused on the use of contemporary drought - tolerant plant materials to create gardens that are compatible with historical buildings. The Forthmann House. The Forthmann House is an Itanianate Victorian house built in the late 1880's, designated as Cultural Monument #113 in the City of Los Angeles, and converted to office use. The adjacent lot to the rear of the house was acquired and converted to a parking lot. While the garden is reminiscent of a residential Victorian garden, many of the plant materials are drought tolerant or California natives. A drip irrigation system was used to minimize water consumption. 6101 Scenic Avenue. This 1920's Mediterranean duplex in the Hollywood Hills, is located on granite with minimal top soil. A semi -wild front garden with a profusion of flowering shrubs and shrub roses provides a burst of color each spring. Top soil was added and drip irrigation was installed to permit penetration of water into the granite soil and to minimize runoff. 2630 Severance Street.. This turn -of -the -Century Craftsman transitional residence was purchased by the USC Real Estate Development Corporation after it has been severely damaged from years of use as a fraternity house. It was converted into apartments. The garden is a simple, low maintenance design. A portion of the front yard is retained as lawn to be compatible with the adjacent residents. Low - maintenance, drought tolerant flowering shrubs and groundcover are used behind the lawn. 875 Shevlin Drive. Located in the hills north of Berkeley, this small, formerly Victorian, nowshingled house, is located on a large lot with a panoramic view of the San Francisco Bay. A carport with deck above was added on the downslope view side of the house to take advantage of the view and connect the house to the garden below. An old garage was removed from the front yard and replaced with a Rhododendron, Azalea and fern garden. Fast-growing trees and shrubs were planted to screen an adjacent, oversized house. Hayes Residence. This 1920's Mediterranean home on a large lot in View Park was recently remodeled. The garden design creates a series of terraces, each with a different character and function and which become less formal as they step down from the house. The first terrace consists of a large courtyard connected to the house. The second includes a lawn and an informal garden focused around a fountain. The lower terraces are primarily for viewing and contain low -maintenance Ganz Residence. In conjunction with the repair and renovation of this Paul Williams homes in Sherman Oaks, the garden is being renovated as well. A raised terrace along the back of the house has been added to connect the house to the garden. The same stone as was used for the chimney has been used as battered walls for the terrace and for its surface as a means of visually connecting the house to the garden. The garden has the feel of an English country garden, with a dense, multi -plant hedgerow along the street and property line, framing the central "greensward." The pool is backed by a layered rose garden. 1 • 3919 Clacton Avenue Los Angeles California 90'.27 - Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 „ � �..'�,i� � r� � �',. ',mow �-,�J^.V� •`* {' .. '.:• �1.•. .�;�� [. 7k �tw.. .� ° •.” �'r •+t. r �� ' t4 �•� z r - „• � ti���•-� = .�"� r�y1 Y ' ''` .• � Q { g •' - . f .+ lr_-.ir.+r. i rd�c�.._..T„- .."' Q",f.• r "~. � t � f ', � T.� � 1� A 1 � r �` _ . .. * • w _ ' ! , tit � t • � w. r 7 T � y . �✓r _ y � 1. 'Mr.e�.J"!. �K' Z�y�'i•-r-"���*-.11\. ^,"�.� •4L—,v ii4•.�e ►r• i. __y. �j. • 'r ,�•� �F Gh';_ r'yA _ .•�`,�.. •� �' sJr . '• "`6 } f �•'x i' '�!r r• •."�` �ily 'J�� ' f rr L t r._ Y _ 3' r' _ •f r E . •. _ y ��11 �,= �.�Y1 r,� i t .p A�l r' 'j `1 �,,,� � S K �� � .�i - , h . +. y' � i � � { ^ _ •• '� r � . T � �,. � \ •� .L V 'r`I 4 T .'� ' �, ♦,j1 . � i5 r �r ,� j'� J 1.+�. - i'�� �'•• }- l-.�l ` +4. \, �r.I �' {ry . ••• i�..l.. �� AO.— ,� `, •�' .4 ;, ���fa♦'; ..y f { �tiy_. 'Al ,•tti tyl. •l+ �(!*r, �4! t�L r Y i� ~ ' _o i �a.r� '� �-•� ,�- 9 '(^Y 5!Kfl^n�A. t;^,.a."'<<. "' tr G r�r�"' +n.{ ,} 1 '�!;r �, � �i:. rf r, •_ti �y r ,. �'r � l� r ���. � i •'�✓��,��,. - ' •1. t� a�4 � �•..r _ �C.e. {�"'G l '�� ' . �; r r '� r ~ r °- "« r• _ = 4 � �•�j r1 iF t ]' �11r., �_ 1� r..yi Si -Sri^ "� `r �- � �' � •! 'L' • � � r r � r p . � �.'• ._yl. tk ":•y' -, ', _ - r1 i, a�� 'ti.,�. .•., ti,t y r } � tiN t f .,. ; r - 1- r , 5 ,. L.. •! ; { r ti _ k r 44 t ; i c ••'t :� _ w ' •f y� e. : "� 1. ` j �� 'ti � '1 ti �r- It��d +.1S C �p , ! f , i� ,dr C, �rMf �r��' °"'1'�� r 1 �': •i"�* t.. ,�„'�M11,•»;•, y� :.7 ` �i �'' •. �r �:�• Y � �k �^t�� ��iae-�•. • , � f J 1•r�rl, � � 7.� a'4� '_.�s- ~ .�='!! ����'�� �:v - � C�.:;�-i •+`S'• , .+%_ &, �� �� �i� �,,s. „1'S� i t. .: a•lf J'1! .{r.. ti ; - -_ mr� .L _ � At +,.'1 �•. - '-,r? , .i')•r�'�''I�F'j�R.- .ti'F,-�'.t _ 'r r i d �,r_ - .-�a�,:1�• �i:���^ - '�',4•�F.` '_ y_ i '` �+t '�"Yi.4i" '�.� } _; r' rat-w�,t \},.�: ;.k,�]i o:�,-';r •{ --y = ��' :;ri �'••`i,. ��4,�^«,� w � f' rr b�' ai�i�,_; 7�i��� _�:: ,�'�.:.��'�'..�,•r •w �-'��4Y{�'y►-?��' ����~ "ant �� �,� �, m 4; �. S, ,, a �tt t 3 � t -' � .. * •i ; �h s � • + � ��Y y� :.r ,�+ti4 �y� y�4la^.,a:r4''�iµ• s j ',yam r� 1 •gyp �•�.r=r 2 ..: ,,�. �S.i�. y ----ccri e.,—•�"�� ............ cwr' �. r - l - `S,�'{ ` •ti U f1�,y�``�� tom. , ,` `r _S r .-'- ���-:`'ry. •.i f" 1{iLs' "' '' br .� 9Y.�: {774jM .1� ���•.��.�. rc-�• , .�:- - - r' �c-�f QyiT��r�'._;�•rp�„��.�r,.s �: �rF;.� 4y'17j',,A� ,M •qr -a. ,'� ' - ---._ � .. F - _ it ir'•. h. -..•r i�.: 'r.2 ..r. 1 1 • Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Land Planning and Asset Management Pat Smith has provided land and development planning services to both private and public sector clients for a wide variety of land holdings. Representative projects include the following. She has extensive experience in obtaining entitlements. Having worked with both public and private sector clients, she is able to develop and obtain approvals for plans that are economically. feasible and responsive to the planning goals of the communities in which they are located. Sterling Forest Community, New York, Sterling Forest Corporation. As a consultant to Sedway Cooke Associates, Pat Smith prepared the development standards and design guidelines for this 17,500-acre new community located about 50 miles north of Manhattan, required as part of the development approval applications required by the three towns in which the community is located. She also coordinated the preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement for the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Asset Management and Development Planning, Loma Linda University. At Gruen Associates, Pat Smith prepared a comprehensive evaluation of a series of properties owned by Loma Linda University and located throughout San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. In identifying a recommended land use or uses for each site, a variety of factors, including "highest and best use"(i.e., maximum economic return for the University), market demand and likelihood of approval by governing agencies. The phasing of development over time, financial arrangements (including long-term ground leases versus fee simple sales), and planning documents and approvals required to obtain development entitlements were also evaluated. Illustrative plans were prepared as a basis for seeking development approvals. Subsequently, Gruen Associates has prepared Specific Plans for those properties that are ready to be developed.. Other projects include the following: Development planning for property in the vicninty of the University of Southern California Sterling Homes Specific Plan/EIR, City of Oceanside Land use/development plan for 1,400-acre site in the Silicon Valley, City of Santa Clara Development plan/feasibility study for 77-acre publicly owned hillside site, City of Palo Alto 1 0 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 @ Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design . Landscape Architecture Campus Planning • Planning for campus and vicinity, University of Southern California • Master flan, Claremont College • La Sierra Campus, Loma Linda University • Matthew's Campus, UC San Diego • West Campus Plan, a land-use/development plan for the western portion of the campus and University -owned land in downtown Berkeley, University of California at Berkeley • 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 ■ Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture RESUME 0 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California K027 w Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 ' Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning .Urban Design . Landscape ArchitecturePatricia L. Smith, Principal Education Master of Landscape Architecture (Design and Planning), UC Berkeley,1979 (Regents, ASLA and Beatrix Farrand Fellowships and ASLA Merit Award),1979. Bachelors of Arts in Environmental Studies and Sociology, UC Santa Barbara (Highest Honors and Phi Beta Kappa),1974. Registration ' Licensed Landscape Architect, State of California Professional Affiliations American Planning Association American Society of Landscape Architects Experience 20 years as project manager for environmental impact assessments, land -use and transportation planning, housing development, and other planning and development projects. Managed numerous multi- disciplinary teams and directed major citizen participation programs for large-scale planning projects for ' private and public sector clients. Extensively involved in pre -development planning and construction management for private projects, including coordination with local agencies, interest groups and community members. ' Principal, Patricia Smith, ASLA 1992 - Present + Mission Street Specific Plan, Light Rail Station Design and EIR, City of South Pasadena + Development Standards and Design Guidelines for Sterling Forest, a 17,500-acre community in New York, Sterling Forest Corporation and the Towns of Tuxedo, Warwick and Monroe 0 Streetscape Improvements, technical assistance to community groups, Los Angeles Neighborhood . Initiative (LANI), Mayor's Office, City of Los Angeles Land use survey and alternatives for Westlake -Pico Union and Wilshire Center/Koreatown Recovery Area EIRs, City of Los Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency ' Senior Associate, Sedway Cooke Associates 1993-94 • Environmental Impact Statement for Sterling Forest, a 17,500-acre, 35,000-resident new community, Sterling Forest Corporation and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Urban Design Element of General Plan Framework, City of Los Angeles Transit -Served "Targeted Growth Area" Studies, City of Los Angeles General Plan Framework Urban Form/Transit System Evaluation, City of Los Angeles General Plan Framework Implementation Program, City of Los Angeles Vice President, USC Real Estate Development Corporation 1988 - 1992 Managed all aspects of for -sale and rental housing for faculty and staff at the University of Southern California, including land planning, architecture and engineering, local and state entitlements including environmental clearances, legal requirements, bid negotiations, construction, marketing and sales Developed transit station area plan and obtained entitlements for proposed light rail extension Managed design and renovation of historic buildings in the North University Park neighborhood, including the Forthmann House (L.A. Cultural Monument) conversion to professional office, Severance House conversion from fraternity house to apartments and, addition; Cockins House conversion from rooming house to bed and breakfast/restaurant (not yet constructed) 1 1 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 ■ Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 ' Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Patricia L. Smith, Principal Page 2 ' • Responsible for planning, environmental clearance and design services for historic building renovation, large-scale commercial development, parking facilities and public improvements [J 11 L 1 Vice President, Gruen Associates 1983-1988 Project manager/responsible for the following as well as other projects: • Westwood Village Specific Plan, Transportation Study and EIR, City of Los Angeles • Hollywood Community Plan Revision and EIR, City Of Los Angeles • Streetscape Improvement Program for the Beverly Hills Triangle, City of Beverly Hills • Development planning for major land holdings in San Bernardino and Riverside counties, Loma Linda University • Sterling Homes Specific Plan and EIR, City of Oceanside • Master Plan, Claremont College • Development and transportation planning, the University of Southern California • Route 71 EIS, Caltrans • Northwest Relief Route Environmental Document, City of Santa Fe/New Mexico State Highway Department Associate, Sedway Cooke Associates 1979-1983 Project manager/responsible for or participated in the following: • West Campus Plan, a land-use/development plan for the western portion of the campus and University -owned land in downtown Berkeley, University of California at Berkeley • Land use/development plan for 1,400-acre site in the Silicon Valley, City of Santa • Development plan/feasibility study for 77-acre publicly owned hillside site, City of Palo Alto • Pleasant Hill BART Station Specific Plan and EIR, City of Pleasant Hill and Contra Costa County • Land use and development sections/project coordination for Los Angeles Metro Rail EIS/EIR, Southern California Rapid Transit Authority • Land use, urban design, and socioeconomic impact assessment for Long Beach -Los Angeles Rail Transit Project EIR, Los Angeles County Transit Commission • Guidelines for energy -efficient urban, site and building design, City of Vacaville • General plan elements for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the counties of Marin, Shasta and Tehema Planner, UC Berkeley Institute for Urban and Regional DevelopmentlLawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1976-1979 • Developed and managed study of the effects of solar energy use on land -use patterns and urban form in case -study locations throughout the United States for the U.S. Department of Energy • Researched land -use impacts of renewable energy use in California, developed a methodology for evaluating the solar potential of housing patterns and design and planning criteria for solar heating Environmental Specialist, Los Angeles City Attorney's Office 1974-1976 • Responsible for advising and assisting City agencies on CEQA, NEPA and other environmental compliance ■ 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 9C0027 • Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 • Patri0a Smith, ASLA Planning • Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture PROJECT SHEETS ■ 3919 Clayton Avenue Los Angeles California 90027 ■ Phone 213 665 1940 Fax 213 665 6790 • Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design • Landscape Architecture Mission Street and Blue Line Station Specific Plan and EIR South Pasadena, California The Mission Street and Blue Line Station Specific Plan will guide development and land use in the vicinity of the future light rail station and along Mission Street, South Pasadena's historic "Main Street." The light rail station, scheduled to be operational by the year 2000, will be located in the heart of the city's historic downtown district along the Blue Line that will run from Long Beach to Pasadena via downtown Los Angeles. The plan's intent is to take advantage of both transit access as a catalyst for economic development and the small-town, pedestrian -oriented character of the Historic District as the focus for that development. The plan, being prepared under the guidance of a 25-member task force, representing property owners, businesses and residents, will define: • A market niche and economic development strategy. A mix and intensity of land uses that is compatible with transit service and with the historic, small-town character of the district including vertical mixed use (residential and office above retail), cottage industry in existing small-scale warehouse facilities, as well as convenience and specialty retail and services and office space. • A parking and access plan/program that accommodates demand generated by transit and takes advantage of shared parking opportunities without undermining the pedestrian character of the area. • Public improvements needed to support the economic development, land use and parking strategies, including streetscape elements, including street trees and pedestrian - scale street lights; • Development standards and design guidelines for historic preservation, new construction and public improvements, including streetscape and parking facilities. • Short- and Iong-term implementation programs. The Station Concept Design will establish the character and design elements to be incorporated into the transit station and its immediate vicinity. Client: City of South Pasadena Date: 1994-1995 1 1 1 1 Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative Bus Stop Design Demonstration Project Los Angeles, California As a member of the Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative (LANI) Design Collaborative, Pat Smith provided technical assistance to communities selected for funding of bus stop -related improvements. Each of the eight demonstration communities established a board comprised of local property owners, merchants and residents. Through a community -based planning effort, the boards, with assistance from the Design Collaborative, identified an initial package of streetscape improvements at key bus stops totaling about $1.3 million and including bus shelters, street lighting, street trees and paving. Bus stop improvements are designed to help define the identity of each community and to support both bus ridership and economic development of adjacent properties. Public involvement efforts included a series of public meetings at which slide shows illustrating design possibilities for each community were presented, followed by open discussions of the communities' concerns and preferences. Based on this input, each board selected a package of improvements tailored to its community's specific needs and established priority locations for the installation of those improvements. Client: Mayor's Office, City of Los Angeles Date: 1994 I I �J Pa• cia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Transit -Served Community Development Standards, Sterling Forest, New York As a consultant to Sedway Cooke Associates, Pat Smith formulated a series of development standards to implement a new community that will accommodate 35,000 residents on 25% of a 17,500-acre site. The remaining 75% will be preserved as open space. Residential development will be clustered in a series of hamlets, each with a commercial and community center within walking distance of most homes in the hamlet. Office, R & D, and light industrial development will be concentrated along a scenic corridor in which such uses have already been established. A jobs -housing balance will be achieve through the development of housing at prices that are matched to the salary levels of projected jobs. A mixed -use center, including a pedestrian -oriented "Main Street", will serve as the commercial and social focus of the community. The community will be served by a local jitney system that links hamlets and commercial areas to one another and to the nearby commuter rail station that connects to New York City. A single set of standards was designed to interface with the existing standards of three towns in which the community will be located. The standards address permanent open space, roadway design, housing design, commercial development design, and utilities. Client: Sterling Forest Corporation Date: 1992 -1993 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i • Housing Standards by Lot Type and Garage Location G A Y A Q E L O C A T I O N Rear of House Rear of Side of House Side of Houle Front of House MOIIftM01Yl'E Detached Attocned•Stde Entry Attached -Front Entry Detocned Summon sanlnlln wt n.ath t m unto f Small Lot• Conventional \ MYirun Of .\ math 90 SmW Lot• / wldersmIlow rarrn<.n Im / a.pfn �l• Roadway Standards -- Collectors .. A. Diadonal Parking/Buudmgs on Both Sides 6^ � 14• tJ' iJ' F IV ' 16' B' ROW Varies - 80' mn. B. DNlded %Mtn CIM SIaDe Collector In Hartret Center Porallal Porking/No Arcade Collector in Hamel Center Diagonal Parkrng/No Buildings - One Skla dm 1 1 I 1 1-1 • Pa0 tricia Smith, ASLA Planning • Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Urban Design Concepts and Development Standards for Transit - Served 'Targeted Growth Areas" Los Angeles, California With Sedway Cooke Associates, Pat Smith prepared a series of urban design investigations and corresponding development standards and public improvement recommendations for transit - served areas that will be designated by the City's new General Plan Framework to accommodate the majority of all future development (95% of all new commercial development and 75% of all new housing). The purpose of the area -wide urban design concepts and the development standards is to 1) create financial incentives to attract developers to TGAs and 2) produce a physical and social context that will attract residents and businesses to them. As a basis for formulating standards and guidelines appropriate to the physical, social and cultural characteristics, economic realities and regulatory framework of the city, a series of "investigations" of Targeted Growth Areas was prepared: 1. building and site characteristics, providing the basis for financial incentives and revisions to the zoning code; 2. Area -wide characteristics, identifying critical public improvements and urban design elements; 3. Design characteristics, identifying critical building and site design elements that should be incorporated into new development projects. Client: City of Los Angeles Date: 1993 -1994 0 ClL � m = = m m = = m = m m = m = m m m = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Urban Form/Transit System Evaluation City of Los Angeles Los Angeles, California With Sedway Cooke Associates, Pat Smith evaluated the relationship of LACMTA's long-range fixed rail transit plan to the city's existing and planned development and activity pattern. The study evaluated the relationship of the proposed transit system to the following factors: • Major existing and proposed employment centers • Existing concentrations of multi -family housing • Existing commercial and cultural activity centers • Designated centers, redevelopment areas and enterprise zones. The evaluation addressed the effectiveness of the proposed transit system (including alternative routes on some corridors) to serve existing and proposed concentrations of activity, to connect jobs and housing, and to provide mobility to transit -dependent neighborhoods. It suggested changes to the adopted MTA plan, including support for the proposed Crenshaw Boulevard route. Client: City of Los Angeles Date: 1992 -1993 I F K. e,ii,-� r A I ~ +9 I... 9 �`� �Y\ 7.5 ZZ — .I i CITYO F LOS ANGELES GENERAL PLAN j- FRAMEWORK Los Angeles City Boundary 7A!. +9 P-J-1w Adliitloml Offlc* Empioyms by 2010 (000's)* FxMft Emplaym (OWs) 9 9 47.3 Now: Psolectotl additional retzil and mdustrid employees am not shown; they dismbution will M among 9-va opt—. .7$ sourcam is LM U.S. Ccom TU N&WISM cognpany Sahway Cwks Aimciatu V MY Z 1993 EXISTING & PROJECTED MAJOR EMPLOYMENT CENTERS rLi LOS ANGEIB DEPARffTMENT CrTY PLAWNG 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LJI Palroicia Smith, ASLA Planning • Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Westwood Village Specific Plan City of Los Angeles Los Angeles, California The City of Los Angeles' Westwood Village Specific Plan, adopted in 1988, was prepared by Pat Smith while she was Vice President at Gruen Associates and replaced the plan prepared by Gruen Associates in the early 1970's. Westwood Village is a concentrated, pedestrian -oriented retail and shopping district adjacent to both high density housing and high-rise office development. It will be served by the MTA Red Line (subway) in the future. The plan revision largely resolved conflicts among commercial property owners and tenants, adjacent residential neighborhoods, the University of California at Los Angeles, and the City of Los Angeles over land use and development intensity. Extensive community involvement, including a multitude of focus group meetings, workshops and one-on-one meetings with property owners, merchants, homeowners' association representatives and UCLA, was essential to the adoption of the balance. The new Specific Plan addresses not only new concerns regarding land use and intensity, but the entire spectrum of issues in Westwood Village in the mid-1980's. In addition to refining the existing plan's land use controls, the revised plan addresses cultural resource preservation, building height, retail use mix provision of validated centralized parking, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, streetscape improvements, and design/signage guidelines. The plan sets forth an implementation strategy which includes parking structure and streetscape improvement financing and a management entity to private coordinated advertising, leasing, events, transportation demand management, and validated parking. Client: City of Los Angeles Date: 1985 -1986 1 1 I] 1 1 1 I 1 Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning • Urban Design ■ landscape Architecture Streetscape Improvement Program, Beverly Hills Triangle Beverly Hills, California While at Gruen Associates, Pat Smith managed the conceptual design and planning phase of the City of Beverly Hill's streetscape improvement program for its central commercial district, including Rodeo Drive. The design concept developed under her direction was for a simple, elegant set of design elements which tie the area together and serve as a backdrop for shops and shoppers. The design concept avoided the common pitfall of over -designed streetscape elements which overwhelm their surroundings and generally prove to costly to gain property and business owners' support. It included not just physical improvements but activities, management and land -use concerns. The recommended program consisted of three components: short- term enhancements including directories and signage, planters, flower boxes and baskets, pedestrian -scale lighting, tree grates, street furniture and limited use of special paving (with enhancements at the option of individual developers); longer -term improvements including redesign of streets to increase pedestrian spaces, pedestrian connections across Wilshire Boulevard, municipal parking structures with restaurant courtyards, focal elements (fountains and sculpture), and gateway treatments; and management concerns including coordinated promotion, maintaining a balanced mix of uses, introduction of anchor uses, maintenance, and special events. Client: City of Beverly Hills Date: 1988 -1989 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 I. Typical street in Business Triangle or on South Beverly Drive. III. Roden Drive and Wilshire Boulevard intersection. E li. Improvements to the streetscape are achieved through shaped trees to allow more visibility to storelronts, repaving and enhancing sidewalks, addition of attrac- tive trash receptacles, hanging and ground Invel Slower planters. awnings and eet- door cafes. IV. Recommended treatment for Rodeo Drive and Wilsniro Boulevard intersection includes upgrading of pedestrian crosswalks to allow easy access to the Business Triangle and department stores, improvements to landscaped medians and a plaza with information kiosk and street vendors. V. Brighton Way and Wilshire Boulevard intersection. VI. Recommended treatment for Brighton Way and Wilshire Boulevard intersec- tion includes enhanced crosswalk treatment, plaza with directory signage, street vendors and cafe. Proposed improvements in pictures IV and VI illustrate the concept of treating Wilshire Boulevard as the gateway to the City's shopping and business district. 1 Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design ■ Landscape Archiiecture Hollywood Community Plan Los Angeles, California Prepared by Pat Smith while at Gruen Associates, this plan (adopted in 1988) revised the original plan which was adopted in 1973. The primary objectives of this plan revision are to: _ Accommodate projected population for the year 2010; _ Establish the foundation for the concentration of development around fixed rail transit stations (the MTA Red Line subway). Provide for an adequate mix and amount of conveniently located retail and service uses to support that population; _ Identify transportation and other public facility improvements needed to accommodate that population and to support permitted non-residential development and regional through traffic. The intent of the plan is to provide the foundation for balancing transportation and public facility improvements with land development on an incremental basis through a subsequent Transportation Specific Plan and the city's capital improvement program. In addition, the plan preserved and enhanced existing neighborhoods, focused around pedestrian -oriented neighborhood centers and will facilitate use of public transportation. The Hollywood Community Plan has served as a model for the citywide General Plan Framework. The Hollywood Community Plan was prepared in close cooperation with the City Council Office and members of the community. Numerous focus groups were held with representatives of homeowners associations, major property owners and business people. Large-scale day -long and evening workshops were held throughout the community at key points in the planning process, each attracting hundreds of residents. The plan was widely supported and was adopted by City Council less than a year after its completion, with virtually no revisions. Client: City of Los Angeles Date: 1987 - 1988 1 w M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M F P..'Rft2 71 f N, -31 Vo j Ic jt N'N. OR A. A' A, A Ili•on - P-1 Off -1 Jzr EMM IYI — —j ME p i 1' -1 , '116 1tea ;T A. HOUSEDal 1047 LAND L1rW- V PLANNED LAND USE w DO MD &MAS =MM vs I TH I LLAIVOOD 110 limp elflu ENIMBEIR11111111B r. 1111MM61111ini. RZI COMINILINFIT IN PL-kN RMSIO�R€fir{[ ,�`�xfk���l� F ri{��i�il�l ; � �..' i � � .�� • , i • ' T i t' � t ' � . ,,.w.r .w..._,• `_ ��= NIL= IM Ll;, f GRUEN NORTH ASSOCIATES 10 1 1 Palroicia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Sterling Forest Community Environmental Impact Statement Hudson River Valley, New York With Sedway Cooke Associates, Pat Smith coordinated the preparation of the program EIS for the Sterling Forest Community. She established a format to be used by all members of the consultant team which substantially reduced the need for rewrites and permitted the Draft EIS for the 35,000-resident community on a 17,500 acre site to be prepared and submitted to the State Department of Environmental Quality (the lead agency) in nine months. In addition to the land use, community character and community facilities analyses, she prepared a detailed visual analysis which relied on computer modeling and computer/photo montages to evaluate the impact of development on views from the Appalachian Trail and other regional trails and highways that pass through the project site. Client: Sterling Forest Corporation Date: 1993 -1994 STERLING CROSSING W(Wble Forr#y Housing 6 ' Office / Research and - p�..� , Y r ns�•. £ �Y� Development I e j sr 'SuPer' drug f vaneN store C.� r Park Corpragote Core \ G t �-Alp .. MOln Street Shopping Area 3Y CROSSM1Cs 2 ' Porkhg Garages t k N, TWO LANE COLLECTOR ROAD+ AND JITNEY ROUTE y,. u FPO Y JITNEY STOPS HAMLET CENTER -SCHOOLS, p t •i SHOPS, PARKS , x 71xyv'; INTERMIX CLUSTERS OF t �r SUBURBAN, SMALL -LOT HOMES, TowwoMES AND wkn-mwy ` UNITS TO ACHIEVE AN AVERAGE GROSS DENSITY OF 5 TO 7.5 UNITS PER ACRE LINEAR FORM OF HAMLET ALLOWS A MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS TO LIVE WITHIN 1500 OF JITNEY STOPS 1, t 1 n C� Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning . Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Wilshire CenterlKareatown Recovery Area Alternatives and OR Community Redevelopment Agency Los Angeles, California The City's Community Redevelopment Agency is formulating development strategies and land use plans for areas of the City affected by the 1992 civil disturbance. The Agency has hired consultants to prepare EIRs to evaluate and provide environmental clearance for the resulting development. The EIRs are being prepared prior to the formulation of the plans and, therefore, assist the Agency and communities in selecting appropriate development strategies and land use plans. For Gruen Associates, Pat Smith prepared a land use survey and formulated a series of alternatives to be evaluated by the Wilshire Center/Koreatown Recovery Area EiR. Those alternatives reflect variations in the following: • The total amount of development; • The TMA and intensity of land uses by sub --Yeas (traffic anahssis zones) and in, in some cases, by parcels • The location of development, particularly in relation to subway stations that are currently under construction; • Urban form, including a comparison between pedestrian - oriented retail with housing above (mixed use) and strip mall development. The proposed alternatives were developed with input from the Community Advisory Committee (CAC). The alternatives were presented to the CAC and discussed at one meeting and were approved at the following meeting. Client: City of Los Angeles Community Development Agency Date: 1995 u 1 1 1 Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning • Urban Design • Landscape Architecture Westlake Recovery Area EIR Alternatives and Land Use Survey Community Redevelopment Agency Los Angeles, California The City's Community Redevelopment Agency is formulating development strategies and land use plans for areas of the City affected by the 1992 civil disturbance. The Agency has hired consultants to prepare EIRs to evaluate and provide environmental - clearance for the resulting development. The EIRs are being prepared prior to the formulation of the plans and, therefore, assist the Agency and communities in selecting appropriate development strategies and land use plans. Pat Smith prepared a detailed land use survey and formulated a series of alternatives to be evaluated by the Westlake Recovery Area EIR. The land use survey documents existing building area by land use by city block as a basis for developing the alternatives and evaluating their impacts. In particular, the analysis will provide additional insight into the over -crowding issue. The alternatives reflect variations in the following: • The total amount of development; • The mix and intensity of land uses by sub -areas (traffic analysis zones) and in, in some cases, by parcels • The location of development, particularly in relation to existing MacArthur Park MetroRail station. The proposed alternatives were developed with input from two Community Advisory Committee (CAC). Client: City of Los Angeles Community Development Agency Date: 1995 1 C u 1 • Patricia Smith, ASLA Planning w Urban Design • Landscape Architecture Historic Building Renovations Los Angeles, California Pat Smith was responsible, as Vice President of Housing for the USC Real Estate Development Corporation, for all aspects of the University's historic renovation projects and faculty/staff housing development in the historic North University Park neighborhood of South Central Los Angeles, as well as planning and entitlements for all off -campus development. Forthmann House. This Italianate Victorian home, built in 1880 in what is now the downtown area of Los Angeles and designated City Cultural Monument 106, was slated for demolition, to be replaced by a parking lot. USC REDC moved the house to its current location three blocks north of the campus in the historic North University Park, restored it, and converted it to office space, including conversion of the attic to a third floor. It currently houses the offices of USC Security and a realtor of historic homes in the West Adapts community. 2630 Severance Street. This former fraternity house, on the LA CRA's historic register, was purchased because of its severely dilapidated condition, which provided the opportunity for improving the neighborhood and adding housing. The original single family home was converted into four student apartments; an addition consisting of two four -bedroom apartments was constructed. Both the rehabilitation and addition maintain the historic character of the building which is transitional between Victorian and Craftsman architecture. Client: University of Southern California Date: 1989 -1990 " !-W-L -—IM-N,\� ti 1 NQ •�. :`7' �'. ", ''• - 11�hf. ��� .'��, ., a 'i •11 .. �.. �t� �.'�r�-i•'rJY.�'.)�1�:� -•� �«,:"i�' ._�,•E+•� ^. � y�:�`L�i:. i�l�::ir��` r�i•, _ •w„� 'r:...�:`a'•.;.j;l• _,`'2�:!_.:` -- .�.!" -,.' [.,;� r -'S�'� ���C.�L� i :tom -� I y,_....Ir;, ..s l • • .'f'!(rc�.,,: �. _. �: ' ^� .� -• �-'•' '.• �K�r, r; e�w.. �er� ' � i,' '----�„'�'�� � ', s.• I �I •� '� i{tir'. r A� rti� �^ IP`#�, ' • i pY,3 a•�b:'�r �,�t:: i�',,5 ��";1:11 �r1 ref � '?;a�1� .I�.Yr. .4 `+', f ��• �1 tiry t j.. ��_' ,l:yai'�-+. '`pg�! � l•Itx�'�. ��A. �II`' f; 1 �i • _ V _ y. 1• 3t L.i �i•� '. I�4fJ � '.R•x"f�. ;,�1,�.+-'j .' � y� .�r,i, .�: � jai. 'I 'T;• ' 1 i• w ,1 � �tr 11 �•d �i ti � •�: n t t • a :'-I e s 1 t;. •�,'yl�' � � y��:� 4' ^`�yl •1,'�� s.' i .,�'. � :,5.� � � 4 ��,�.•.11.5�.��' ��•� vras t + �"t r3 .I 5• L'n' tsip �'�,• _� :1 �y�Tdr;•ti ��C= t5�/'� h h. �), yr I �;,, t A4 -i�'�'.III :1�, K�ir�;,t�r(��A.��ti- '• ... A,"t (. � i`�tiC i., li.l� tYfY•"�'�F1 ��JyVaiL% �{, .��-YF- `. - .r i T�•l :� � •i;'r'�r >S�a .�, �,1�':� l�"'IJ�,\�•r_��.�d;ll. :�T•` �ti. � � '^t 1r< ' • Patcia Smith, ASLA Planning ■ Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture 1 Urban For -Sale Housing: The McCulloch Townhomes Los Angeles, California The McCulloch Townhomes consist of 27 for -sale twnhomes and ' apartments over a partially subterranean parking structure on a one -acre site two blocks from USC. The development is located on land owned by the University and leased to the individual ' homeowners for 99 years, which permits the University to restrict sales to USC faculty and staff. The project is designed as contemporary Craftsman architecture to fit into the eclectic architectural styleof the historic North University Park neighborhood in which it is located. The McCulloch Townhomes were completed December 1, 1990. All unit had been sold as of September 1,1991. As project manager Pat Smith directed the planning and design effort; obtained entitlements from the city and state; supervised ' construction; directed development of legal documents including the ground lease, CC&R, and other Homeowners Association documents; developed the model units; and assisted with the ' marketing program. ' Client: University of Southern California ' Date: 1990 -1992 1 _ L.� # _ 1. ."Will, ."r 9� r.ow aw 89 rr , low AL � � -_� i /� r •� ;<, '•dry �{, �y�:, ..} r:-;: sal , -. «...-�...6��A �' ��•• � r � 9 ..d! • ,':': i � � "'"` `' -:.al�.'\;�� ��-' ';� � •mow :. 'I -'s� ..,....-� r' ,. j" 'E.....i,_.._.�...;,f 1 I 1 n 1 1 1 • Pa•cia Smith, ASLA Planning • Urban Design ■ Landscape Architecture Urban For -Sale Housing: The Courtyards Los Angeles, California Located across the street from the McCulloch Townhomes, the Courtyards was designed as 114 for -sale townhomes and apartments and 12 rental apartments. It would be located on land leased to the University from Hebrew Union College, which in turn would be leased to the homebuyers. This project is outside the historic district and more proximate to the University; its architectural style is aligned with that of the early campus, incorporating classical European style with tile roofs, columned arcades, smooth stucco walls and brick pavers. The Courtyards was designed to be built in three to four phases, depending on the absorption rate experienced initially. As project manager Pat Smith was responsible for planning and design, entitlements, and legal aspects of the project, as well as bidding and construction contraction negotiation Client: University of Southern California Date: 1991 -1992 233 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 130, Santa Monica, CA 90401 939 Glenneyre Street, Suite B, Layuna Beach, CA 92651 Tel> 310 • 451 • 4488 / Fax> 310 - 451 • 5279 tei> 714 , 497 , 0144 / Fax> 714 • 497 , 0158 E-Mail> per@chelsea.ios.com E-Mail> coneco(a,,aol.com