HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) - 2017-02-06 a .
Dept.ID PW 17-003 Page 1 of 2
Meeting Date:2/6/2017
Vul A)
1L lO�ile,-Z 6 D —
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
; REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 2/6/2017
SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Travis K. Hopkins, PE, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Approve and authorize execution of Orange County Transportation Authority's
Utility Agreements No. UK041241 and UK041106 for the relocation of two (2)
City of Huntington Beach Water Pipelines for the 405 Widening Project
Statement of Issue:
The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), in cooperation with California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans), is proposing to improve Interstate 405 between State Route 73 and
Interstate 605. As a part of this project, OCTA will need to relocate two (2) existing City of
Huntington Beach Water Pipelines. Each pipeline has a separate Utility Agreement (UA). These
UAs acknowledge that the City has prior rights for each these pipelines, which obligates OCTA to
pay for the relocation. These UAs also provides OCTA with a mechanism to reimburse the City for
actual engineering reviews, inspections, staff time, and other expenses incurred during
construction.
Financial Impact:
The UAs allows OCTA to reimburse the City for all actual engineering review, inspection, staff time,
and other expenses incurred during the construction of these pipelines. Staff has estimated the
total cost toward the relocations to the City of Huntington Beach at $118,060. Funds for these
activities are included in Water Fund business unit 50685801. These costs will be reimbursed by
OCTA on a time and material basis as invoiced by City Staff at the time the services are provided.
The UAs also require the City to provide a credit to OCTA for the depreciation of each pipeline.
The depreciation credit for both pipelines combined is $60,479. Each UA subtracts the depreciation
credit from the estimate of expenses that will be incurred by the City to obtain a total cost to OCTA.
Recommended Action:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Orange County Transportation (OCTA) Utility
Agreements UK041241 and UK041106, and return all signed original agreements to OCTA for their
final approval.
Alternative Action(s):
Reject Utility Agreements and provide direction to staff.
Analysis:
The Interstate 405 (1-405) freeway improvement project has been developed by OCTA in
cooperation with Caltrans and local agencies to improve capacity and facility operations between
State Route 73 and Interstate 605. The project is primarily funded by Renewed Measure M (M-2)
and has been approved for a design-build approach. As a part of this project, three (3) existing
potable water pipelines will require relocations and/or modifications. These potable water pipelines
Item 11. - 1 HB -330-
Dept.ID PW 17-003 Page 2 of 2
Meeting Date:2/6/2017
are located at Newland Street and the 1-405, Edinger Avenue and the 1-405, and at Sugar Avenue
(McFadden Avenue) and the 1-405. OCTA has prepared UAs for two of the three City-owned
pipelines, of which the City has established prior rights, and they are located in Edinger Avenue and
Newland Street. A third UA for the pipeline located in Sugar Avenue will be presented to Council at
a later date.
City's prior rights were established in documents from the California Division of Highways (Caltrans
processor agency), which relocated these pipelines when the 1-405 freeway was initially
constructed. The prior rights obligate OCTA to provide for the relocation of these City-owned
facilities at OCTA's expense. OCTA has estimated that the relocation of the pipeline in Newland
Street will cost $3,200,000, and $1,800,000 for the pipeline in Edinger Avenue. The final
engineering design plans will be provided by OCTA's Design-Build contractor.
The following table summarizes the calculation of reimbursements to the City.
Description OCTA Utility Estimated Depreciation Credit Net Estimated
Agreement City's Calculated per Costs to OCTA
No. Engineering Chapter 13 of the = A _ B
/ City Inspection, and State High Way
Project CC# Water Utility Manual S&H Code 705
Cost Credit to OCTA
(Reimbursable)
"A" (Cost to City) "B"
22-inch Pipe by UK041106 $59,430 $44,277 $15,153
Newland & 1-405 /CC1520
12-inch Pipe by UK041241 $58,630 $16,202 $42,428
Edinger& 1-405 /CC1521
Total $118,060 $60,479 $57,581
Public Works Commission Action:
Not applicable for the project is being funded and constructed through OCTA.
Environmental Status:
Not applicable
Strategic Plan Goal:
Enhance and maintain infrastructure
Attachment(s):
1. Location Maps
2. Two (2) sets of Orange County Transportation Authority Utility Agreement No. UK 0401106.
3. Two (2) sets of Orange County Transportation Authority Utility Agreement No. UK 0401241.
4. Depreciation Credit for the Edinger Pipeline, UK 041241.
5. Depreciation Credit for the Newland Pipeline UK 041106.
6. City of Huntington Beach Estimate of Cost to Relocate the Newland Pipeline.
7. City of Huntington Beach Estimate of Cost to Relocate the Edinger Pipeline.
HB -3 3 i- Item 11 . - 2
ATTACHMENT # 1
Dint COUNTY I ROUTE POST MILES 5%T OTAL
TOtAL PROJECO. SHEETS
12 Oro 22,405 R0"5�2.1R3.9�1T N.0
• .I(h'yi(Py8(OyVE[tA[8trt'aqI°CD a `�'a','-�
P37VJ3.9,.,.3 �'��0 y' REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER DATE o
�1
�, OCTA ��/���✓° PLANS APPROVAL DATE
• \i j�, \ \, \ �., �, Y\' ,(.�y+ !AY 5!I!F GY Gt/f[WN/I Ov/!5 LIrF/CF.vS •p ,-I V I L N➢
\�.Ncr/'i�vze'r a`v�°awf! ss a�uo •O'F,r�.. �
^Y Cp^/FS LV!x/5 P[IM SxFfl.
w {, / q\ ✓. `a •+„ +•L4$ ,x/\� Iff
ORANGE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHgi1TY
'+t \,% <;,\ •'✓'\/\/ 550 SOUTH WIN STREET
ORANGE,CA 92863
� w
w �
14, J. y
i\ l vt
LL
BA
d
a \\ \ / f
�'� \ �C \`` ,as BARRY PI TIMOTHYj'l l
m E f c� i
__ ... W
w
r
w ' LM
W^ Y4o \ \�\ EC 5 ROUTE 405 In
N "A"LINE
F \
E 7 _8._ -_ B 83- .. - t _ \ 2 3 4 835 6 7 8 .. 9 , ..1 s. 2.. 3 .. 4 845 ,. ...6 7 8 9 850 i 2
W m \ \ \ \ NB ROUTE 405
fJ _'.
..
E _ 3
.._ ..... + �a ) \. / \4\E i...�Sm EO/NCEl7 CHANNEL.
= 1 .
�\ C,
\ S i E f
I \ 4Oi \ ,y \'i' �r �,, -r JQCT fI n� r^ "7 ( !
\`Y 4
G i\
< \ '.. �'� Ps-, `C\.�✓J\ \ ,/ , \ '�, °`vQ ,r \\ \ S''f"�'" r I \� ' S"SFF•`:�'�'
o .�: '.�\`',,'j .l�,4.I'-,'
jlrGsoF
lz
o a
Cl � wE ►ad \\ UTILITY
\ �o
SCALE: t"=100' o
BORDER LAST REVISED 7/2/2010 uSERHANE->•uSER RELATIVE..ROER SCALE ° 1 3 UNIT 2994 PROJECT NUMBER &PHASE 00000000001
OGN EILE•>MEOUESi IS IN INCHES I I !
DI°Y COUNTY I ROUTE POST MILES SHEET TOTAL
TOTAL PROJECT No. SHEETS
12 OrO 22,405 RO.fiA0.1,RO.7A1.0
12.1
IER�tjp�ft{814ftA6MTP
x ' t�ROJEC \,\�� // afl 'T6 \ '�?� \ _ 'ti REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER DATE
4 P'
OCTA �A/fJ7ClIL°
{ .p`i".,��0P0,$EB /11l PLANS APPROVAL DATE\ 31p'
& • `S )NE SIAIE LY CA[/F[NN/A C!9/15 CYf/CCFS W Ems.
'''111 JM A b j CM AGENTS L/A[[Atl!BE AESPGWS/6[E!Ox r C I V 1
/✓ `,, \� e �� )NE 1-11[iP CgYYEEfAE55 Cf 5<AA°EO CSAN a nLM1�2
+
gtANGE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
550 SOUTH MAIN STREET
,♦p� „� \L'R ,c`�Qj' a tz '' .`, \ ��a ORANGE.CA 92863
- �n�, q F �1V e `i'-�•—fir-� a � ., � ,�;
e.
\ �„�� 4., � DLO'•\:\ /%/. � � '� v ��\ ,�\
\ y� � �✓ ✓ HUNYINGTON BEACH > r
.,.,3;� ,� \�3 j/ \`�\ ,'�.\�"'� -'\\ \c .✓ /!i.%A :�R8 OOSEQ
if CI OF E ef11STER "C
� � E
��� ��w.h-�-,Y:",� ���,,.,:>• `l\.> � i•� �` �f ��y
'` + :✓ a ir��.""/ ^�,y-. Ave
w
w '
! . l
;' \ .. U 4'. ....ii^' .; i' 11 `e. '1 1 a, •-�'�Z >.-.a a__ '- F
Ww
C1 .. ..:a. Y E _...-......... _
SB ROUTE 405
m it
F 855 8 8 9 r/ j 1,�n 2 3 4 865 @ 7 8 9 870 1 2 �4 8T1A:k 6 7 8 9//880' 1 2
J
m NB ROUTE 405 / j/ N /
...................................... / ........................... _
a
.. ..W,.mx:::.m•..._y,'^.::.^e_:::::en':.t:T:.::-::.c:crvXy "l Y"4A ...
• %/ n j"C 4
4,rrlcoMm low
11
I TO
BIE
/ 00,
a�� 'tic �
s S49r a la
s �( \ "� /� ,�� �m\�✓/`� Nil'
e.
NO,'��
\K .E/ \J/S��i�'•✓` `r ` \ .F , ' 3 ``� �, 2/ .. s°a MT. ,4/ ':C
• t--+ ! <4,ry \ `� \ %J ti i / e h N' Sip UTILITY
-12
t` �p��a SCALE: 1"=100' o
.o
0
USER NAME-)WSER RELATIVE fiOROER SCALE 0
BORDER LAST REVISED 1/2/2010 DGN FILE•)MREOUEST 15 Iry I.C.,, I 1 i UNIT 2994 PROJECT NUMBER 1 11111 00000000001
ATTACHMENT #2
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
UTILITY AGREEMENT
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE POST MILE EA PROJECT ID
12 Oran-e 1-405 9.3-24.2 12-OH1000 1200000180
FEDERAL AID NUMBER OWNER'S PLAN NUMBER
HPLULN-6071(043) N/A
FEDERAL PARTICIPATION
On the project ® YES ❑ NO On the Utilities ❑ YES ® NO
UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. UK041106 DATE M H I
The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in cooperation with the California Department of
Transportation ("Caltrans") is proposing to improve Interstate 405 between State Route 73 and Interstate 605
(Project). OCTA and Caltrans have entered into Cooperative Agreement No. 12-697 relating to the Project
under which Caltrans will provide Project oversight and upon completion of the Project, Caltrans will
continue to own and maintain the Interstate 405.
City of Huntington Beach
Hereinafter referred to as "OWNER", owns and maintains the following (the "Utility Facilities")
• 20-inch PVC in 30-inch steel in 36-inch steel casing (connects to 24-inch over channel, 22-inch
in Newland Street) along Newland Street crossing I-405
within the limits of the OCTA Project which requires
relocation
to accommodate the OCTA Project.
It is hereby mutually agreed between OCTA and OWNER as follows:
I. .WORK TO BE PERFORMED
In accordance with Notice to Owner No's UK041106 dated 12/6/2016, OCTA shall relocate
OWNER's Utilities Facilities as shown on OCTA's contract plans for the improvement of
Interstate 405, EA 12-OH1000 which by this reference are made a part hereof. OWNER hereby
acknowledges review of OCTA's plans for work and agrees to the construction in the manner
proposed. Deviations from the plan described above initiated by either OCTA or the OWNER,
shall be agreed upon by both parties hereto under a Revised Notice to Owner. Such Revised
Notices to Owner, approved by OCTA and agreed to/acknowledged by the OWNER, will
constitute an approved revision of the plan described above and are hereby made a part hereof.
No work under said deviation shall commence prior to written execution by the OWNER of the
Revised Notice to Owner. Changes in the scope of the work will require an amendment to this
Agreement in addition to the revised Notice to Owner. OWNER shall have the right to inspect
the work during construction. Upon completion of the work by OCTA, OWNER agrees to
accept ownership and maintenance of the constructed facilities and relinquishes to OCTA
ownership of the replaced facilities, except in the case of liability determined pursuant to Water
Code 7034 or 7035.
04-25-2016
UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) Page of 5
UTILITY AGREEMENT NO.
UK041106
II. LIABILITY FOR WORK
Existing facilities are located in their present position pursuant to rights superior to those of
STATE and will be relocated at OCTA expense.
III. PERFORMANCE OF WORK
OWNER shall have access to all phases of the relocation work to be performed by OCTA, as
described in Section I above, for the purpose of inspection to ensure that the work is in
accordance with the specifications contained in the OCTA Contract; however, all questions
regarding the work being performed will be directed to OCTA's Resident Engineer for their
evaluation and final disposition.
Use of out-of-state personnel (or personnel requiring lodging and meal "per diem" expenses)
will not be allowed without prior written authorization by OCTA's representative. Requests for
such authorization must be contained in OWNER's estimate of actual and necessary relocation
costs. Accounting Form FA-1301 is to be completed and submitted for all non-State personnel
travel per diem. OWNER shall include an explanation why local employee or contract labor is
not considered adequate for the relocation work proposed. Per diem expenses shall not exceed
the per diem expense amounts allowed under the State's California Department of Human
Resources (CaIHR)travel expense guidelines.
Work performed directly by OWNER's employees shall comply with Labor Code Section
1771. OWNER shall verify compliance with this requirement in the administration of its
contracts referenced above.
IV. PAYMENT FOR WORK
OCTA shall pay its share of the actual and necessary cost of the herein described work within
45 days after receipt of OWNER's itemized bill, signed by a responsible official of
OWNER's organization and prepared on OWNER.'s letterhead, compiled on the basis of the
actual and necessary cost and expense incurred and charged or allocated to said work in
accordance with the uniform system of accounts prescribed for OWNER by the California
Public Utilities Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or Federal
Communications Commission,whichever is applicable.
It is understood and agreed that OCTA will not pay for any betterment or increase in capacity
of OWNER's facilities in the new location and.that OWNER shall give credit to OCTA
for the accrued depreciation of the replaced facilities and for the salvage value of any material
or parts salvaged and retained or sold by OWNER.
Not more frequently than once a month, but at least quarterly, OWNER will prepare and
submit progress bills itemized for costs incurred not to exceed OWNER's recorded costs as
04-25-20]6
UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) Page 3 of 5
UTILITY AGREEMENT NO.
U K041106
of the billing dateless estimated credits applicable to completed work. Payment of progress
bills not to exceed the amount of this Agreement may be made under the terms of this
Agreement. Payment of progress bills which exceed the amount of this Agreement may be
made after receipt and approval by OCTA of documentation supporting the cost increase and
after an amendment to this Agreement has been executed by the parties to this Agreement.
The OWNER shall submit a final bill to OCTA within 360 days after the completion of the
work described in Section I above. If OCTA has not received a final bill within 360 days after
notification of completion of OWNER's work described in Section I of this Agreement, and
OCTA has delivered to OWNER fully executed Director's Deeds, Consents to Common Use
or Joint Use Agreements for OWNER's facilities (if required), OCTA will provide written
notification to OWNER of its intent to close its file within 30 days. OWNER hereby
acknowledges, to the extent allowed by law, that all remaining costs will be deemed to have
been abandoned. If OCTA processes a final bill for payment more than 360 days after
notification of completion of OWNER's work, payment of the late bill may be subject to
allocation and/or approval by the OCTA.
The final billing shall be in the form of an itemized statement of the total costs charged to the
project, less the credits provided for in this Agreement, and less any amounts covered by
progress billings. However, OCTA shall not pay final bills which exceed the estimated cost
of this Agreement without documentation of the reason for the increase of said cost from the
OWNER and approval of documentation by OCTA. Except, if the final bill exceeds the
OWNER's estimated costs solely as the result of a revised Notice to Owner as provided for
in Section I, a copy of said revised Notice to Owner shall suffice as documentation. In either
case, payment of the amount over the estimated cost of this Agreement may be subject to
allocation and/or approval by OCTA.
In any event if the final bill exceeds 125% of the estimated cost of this Agreement, an
Amended Agreement shall be executed by the parties to this Agreement prior to the payment
of the OWNER's final bill. Any and all increases in costs that are the direct result of
deviations from the work described in Section I of this Agreement shall have the prior
concurrence of OCTA.
Detailed records from which the billing is compiled shall be retained by owner for a period
of three years from the date of final payment and will be available for audit by State and/or
Federal auditors. In performing work under this Agreement, OWNER agrees to comply with
the Uniform System of Accounts for Public Utilities found at 18 CFR Part 101, 201, et al.,
and, to the extent they are applicable to owner doing work on the project that is the subject of
this agreement, the contract cost principles and procedures as set forth in 48 CFR, Chapter 1,
Part 31, et seq., 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645, and 2 CFR Part 200 et al. If a subsequent State
and/or Federal audit determines payments to be unallowable, OWNER agrees to reimburse
OCTA upon receipt of OCTA billing. If OWNER is subject to repayment due to failure by
OCTA to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and ordinances then OCTA will ensure
that OWNER is compensated for actual cost in performing work under this agreement.
04-25-2016
UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) Page 4 of 5
UTILITY AGREEMENT NO.
UK041106
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
All costs accrued by OWNER as a result of OCTA's request of March 10, 2015 to review,
study and/or prepare relocation plans and estimates for the project associated with this
Agreement may be billed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
If OCTA's Project which precipitated this Agreement is canceled or modified so as to
eliminate the necessity of work by OWNER, OCTA will notify OWNER in writing and
OCTA reserves the right to terminate this Agreement by amendment. The amendment shall
provide mutually acceptable terms and conditions for terminating the Agreement.
OWNER shall submit a Notice of Completion to OCTA within 30 days of the completion of
the work described herein.
It is understood that said highway is a Federal aid highway and accordingly, 23 CFR,
Chapter 1, Part 645 is hereby incorporated into this Agreement.
In addition, the provisions of 23 CFR 635.410, Buy America, are also incorporated into this
Agreement. The Buy America requirements are further specified in Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21), section 1518; 23 CFR 635.410 requires that all
manufacturing processes have occurred in the United States for steel and iron products
(including the application of coatings) installed on a project receiving funding from the
FHWA.
If, in connection with OWNER's performance of the Work hereunder, OCTA provides to
OWNER any materials that are subject to the Buy America Rule, OCTA acknowledges and
agrees that OCTA shall be solely responsible for satisfying any and all requirements relative
to the Buy America Rule concerning the materials thus provided (including, but not limited
to, ensuring and certifying that said materials comply with the requirements of the Buy
America Rule).
OWNER will provide a no fee encroachment permit to OCTA's Design-Builder prior to
commencing construction of Project. Provided all conditions of such permit have been
fulfilled, the permits shall authorize Design-Builder to commence work within OWNER right
of way, and areas which affect OWNER facilities.
OWNER will review and/or the submitted Project plans within a period of four(4) weeks.
The terms of this Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefits of the Parties hereto.
THE ESTIMATED COSTS TO OCTA FOR ITS SHARE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
WORK IS $15,153.
Signatures on Following Page
04-25-2016
UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) Page s of s
UTILITY AGREEMENT NO.
UK041106
SIGNATURE PAGE
TO
UTILITY AGREEMENT NO.
UK041106
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this Agreement on the dates below.
Owner:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ORANGE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY,
a public entity
APPROVED
By: By:
Mayor Jim Beil
Executive Director,
6 1 apital PrograZ17
Date: ,dam. 2,017 Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO F RM:
By: By:
'chael Gates ames M. Donich
City Attorney General Counsel
AAn/
Date: Date:
By:
Robin Estanislau
City Clerk
Date: 2aEBd U,44Y 21. 20/
04-25-2016
IMPRRVEMENT
PROJECT
Transmittal No: TRN-000052 Date: 12/15/2016
PROJECT: 1-405 Improvement Project
To: City of Huntington Beach
ATTN: Mr.Andrew Ferrigno
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach,CA 92648
From: HNTB
Subject: Notice to Owner and Preliminary Engineering
Agreements for Signature
#of Copies Attached: 1
Description
One copy of each Notice to Owner(NTO)and two copies of each Utility Agreement(UA)covering
conflicts 1106 and 1241 attached for you signature.
Enclosed:
❑ Letter ❑ Plans ❑ Specifications
❑ Change Order ® Other— PEA, NTO
Submitted For:
❑ Approval ❑ As Requested ❑ Your Use
❑ Review and Comment ® Other—UA Signature
Signed By: Vice President Sent Date: 12/15/2016
in e) (title)
' OCTA
ATTACHMENT #3
ATTACHMENT #4
City of Huntington Beach Estimate of Pipeline Depreciation Cost for OCTA Project
Depreciation Calculated in accordance with Caltrans R/W Manual Table 13.04-5
CN1241,12-inch Edinger Pipeline
OCTA 100%liable for relocation costs
Pipeline Relocation Cost $29,600 Department of Highways Utility Agreement No.7Ut-3023,November 18,1965
Estimate of Facility Life 95 years
2011 AWWA"Buried No Longer:Confronting American's Water Infrastructure
Challenge,Figure 5,Estimated Service Lives by Pipe Material
Age of Facility 52 years As built date January 20,1964
Percentage of pipe life used 55%
Depreciation credit to OCTA $16,202
Item 11. - 15 HB -344-
Table 13.04-5(Continued)
S&H CODE SECTION 705-ALLOWABLE CREDITS(Section 13.04.05.06)
Type Explanation
Salvage When relocation is required,the State shall be given credit for the value of any materials from the old
Credit facility that the Owner removes and/or retains from the construction project. Generally,such material is
either reconditioned and returned to stock or sold as scrap. Under PUC accounting regulations,Utility
Owners shall provide a credit based on the original cost.
The State is entitled to a credit for each item of material returned to stock at its current inventory price less
depreciation and less cost of reconditioning. The State is also entitled to a credit in the amount of the sales
price or,if not sold at the time of billing,the estimated value for materials sold or to be sold as scrap or
junk.
The amount of credit the State is entitled to is directly related to the percentage of liability the State pays on
the Utility Agreement. (i.e.,If the liability percentage is 100%State,State will receive full salvage credit.
If the liability percentage is 50%State,State will receive 50%of the salvage credit.)
The Owner must be made aware that the State will not participate in the cost of removing a facility where
the cost is greater than its salvage value unless it has to be removed for safety or aesthetic reasons. See
Section 13.04.07.09 for additional discussions of removal of hazardous material.
Accrued The State shall receive credit for accrued depreciation on the old facilities whenever the relocation of a
Depreciation facility is required. Where there are no replacement facilities,such as for abandoned facilities,credit for
Credit depreciation shall not be taken.
Accrued depreciation credit is an allowance for the value of expired service life. Expired service life is that
portion of a facility's useful life for which the Owner has received a return on their investment or benefit of
service. The credit given shall be based on straight line depreciation computed on original installed cost,
age of facility and normal expected life as reflected in the Owner's books or calculated by industry
standards. For example:
Credit= Age of Facility (Original Cost)
Normal Expected Life
The amount of credit the State is entitled to is directly related to the percentage of liability the State pays on
the Utility Agreement. (i.e..If the liability percentage is 100%State,State will receive full accrued
depreciation credit. if the liability,percentage is 50%State,State will receive 50%of the accrued
depreciation credit.)
Following are special conditions for handling accrued depreciation credits for publicly owned sewers and
private oil company facilities:
l. Publicly owned sewers-The State is not entitled to receive a credit for accrued depreciation on
relocations of publicly owned sewers.
?. Private oil companies-The State is to receive a credit for depreciation on noncommon carrier
(nonpublic utility)longitudinal facilities owned by oil companies. The State has historically calculated
accrued depreciation credit on the following basis:
• Straight-line depreciation,as with other Utility Owners,except the normal expected life will
always be 40 years,as previously agreed to by the State and the oil companies. In other words,
only for the purpose of calculating accrued depreciation credits,the subject oil facility will always
have a normal expected life of 40 years.
• Credit is not to exceed 70 percent of the original installation cost.
• When no accrued depreciation credit is provided,or the credit supplied is zero,the Owner must
supply proof of the remaining service life of the facility and a written certificate from the Owner's
comptroller or chief accountant stating that no part of the replacement facility will be capitalized
or depreciated. (See Section 13.07.06.02.)
13.04- 14(REV 9/2014)
.H -345- Item 11. - 16
INTERSTATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA rnn. r<. Bra. sac s'o.aAtr< S _
DEPARTMu'T f;P PUBLIC WOAAs
DwisION DF HIGHWAYS 07 OrL. i 405 j 17.4 03I 1;h t3 a>n"
Notice Fo- 7-4154 111 I-405-2(11)93
UTTLMES AGREEDfENT NO...ZIIt"302 .....
Relocate rater pipeline and appurtenances in the construction area
of the San Diego Freevay, ,Road 07-Ora-405 14.2/17.4 on Edinger Street
between a we �� of r
Beach Boulevard.
Date.. '3_:..1� ...........4..r ;. .•
FIRST PARTY: State of California.acting by and mrough its Deptrtrnmr of Public Works, Division of HiFhnays,
hereinafter cdccl STATE.
SECOND :ARTs:............._.CITY OF HOTINnTON BEACH WATER DEPARTHENT
_.._......_.._............_. ........................................................._...._.......... ............................
................_..I........ . ..... ........_.I...............
heminaher cillnf OWNER.
Relocation is required of certain utility facilitin of OWNER.car of which is to be bome by STATE becausc. Section
703 of the Streets and Highways Code. Publicly owned utility
used solely to supply water that is lawfully maintained in a city
street and instLI led prior to its becoming a state highway.
I. Description of Relocation,
A. Install
1. 1846 feet 12" I.D. CN/CN. W.S. water pipeline on the
north side of Edinger Street within the Freeway
construction area.
2. 695 feet of 20" I.D. x 1/4" steel pipe casing.
3. 2-12" ML. gate valves.
4. 1-.l" A-V/A-R valve.
5. 1-6" Blow-off.
B. Relocate
One. existing A-V/A-R valve assembly.
C. Abandon
1800 feet + of 12" I.C. cement mortar lined and coated,
welded steel pipe and appurtenances.
s+�
Item 11. - 17 HB _34 _
11, Plans and Estimates '
A11 work shall be performed substantially in accordance with
Oanur's dru ing aunherod Sheet 1-B, and estimate dated
February 21, 1963, (in file in the District 07 Office of the
Division of Highways, 120 South Spring Street, Los Angeles,
California.
4�r
III. Relocation and Reimbursement Procedure
A. All relocation work shall be done by contractur on a p ''
competitive bid basis.
B. State shall reimburse Owner upon receipt of six (6) copies
of itemized bills of cost of the work in accordance w;th
Owner's regularly established accounting practice, with the
State receiving credit for accrued depreciation.
IP. It is understood than said highway '.s a Federal-Aid Uig�aKay
and accordinglyy Bureau of Public Roads Policy ana Procedure
Eemorandum 30-t+ as amended is hereby incorporated into this
Agreement with the understanding that provisions governing
reimbursement procedures are applicable to tho relationship
between the State and the United State;l.
V. In order to comply with Title YI of the United States Civil
Rights Act of 1964, Appendix A is attached to and made a
part of this Agreement, excepting therefrom any and all work
perforne,i by Owner's o-,-i forces.
i
i
i
� I
I
G
1
-2
{f+i
I
i
HB -347- Item ll. - 18
I
1 l
�IlI'
i
E�
Estimatnl Gust ro STATE $ 29,.600..00 .
OWNER acmes to perform and STATE agrees to pay for the alone desrribed work in ac.ord:nce with-
..............
...... .......... _
-............. . .._ ............
IN WIT T S WHEREOF.the pities have eaccutrd this agreement the dap and}car first ahive written.
CITY OF iTI NTZGTOH IZACH
H .. LPGRT��i�T...... Via.._....... . ..
A AL RrrG►oar. nElt: / _..`.. _ ..................._...
t !
... .... .._.. .. ............ ._. BY..............................__.............................._......._...-.-.._...
.. ee1...r..... ! �K•q d(
STA71!Of CALIFORNIA
1)EPARTSIENT OF PUBLlc WORMS
APPROVR.'1: �\7 1 OF HIG}rT
11Cr.Itt.wr�rrr
fJ�................. ........-.. B� _�....1rC.....
Arin~Cbirf Rick.f P.r ntwr
Deputy District Engineer
M5 +
CXB f ti
Item 11. - 19 HB -348-
i
APPENDIX A
During the performance of thi% enntrart, the contractor, for itself, its
assignees and saeee%sur%in ieter•st thereinafter referred to as the "contrac.
for"),agrees Rs fUllewS: [ .
u
(I) Compliance with Regtdations: The contractor will comply with the
Regulation%of the Department of Connner•e relative to nonlis,-rimina.
tinn in federallymssWed program% of the Department of ommerce
(Tithe V.('ode of Federal It,•cnlation%. Part h,hereinafter referred to
as the Regulation%), which are her-in incorporated by reference and ties
made a part of thi%contrm•t !'
.L
(2) Nondiseriminatlan: The;nnirai ter with regard to the work performed ..
by it after award tied prior to entup:etinn of the contract work, will
not di%criminate on th,•ground of race,color,rr national origin in the s
Releetion anti r.•tention of %nb:ontrxctors, iaehuding procurements of
materials and b•a%es of equipment. The contractor will not participate
either direeth•or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section
6.4 of the Regulations. including employment prgqcticrs when the con-
tract covers a progrntn se: forth `n Appendix A. I of the Regulations. , •,
(3) Boliaitations for Subcontracts,Including Procuremenu of Idatertals and
Equipment: In all%n!i6tation%either by competitive bidding or negoti.
ation made by th.•cr:ntrnetor for work to be performed under a sub.
contracr, including prm•uremrnt% of materials or equipment, each
potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor
of the cm:tramo:%obligations under this contract and the Regulations
relative to nondiscrimination oa the ground of rare,color or national
origin.
(4) Idormatior.and Reports: The contractor will provide all information
and reports required by the Re•eulation%, or nrlers and instructions
issued pursuant thereto, and will permit nceres to its books, records,
accountA, other sourer,, of information, and its facilities as may be
determined by the State flichway Drpanmem or the Bureau of Public
Roads to be pertinent to x%rrrtnin compliance kith .nub Regulations,
orders and instructions.Where one,information required or a contractor
Is In the exclusive po%session of another who fails ter refusr%to furnish
this information,the contractor shall so n•rrifh• to the State Highway
Department,nr the Bureau of Public Roads:t% appropriate, and shall
set forth what elfntts it It"made no obtain the information.
(5) Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the contractor's noncam.
relianc2 with the nondiscrimination provi%inns of this contract,the State
Highway Department shell umpe%c such oe:ntract satielivnx ea it or the
Dur•au of Public Roads may determine to be appropriate, including,
but not limited to,
(a) withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until
the contractor complies.%nd or
(b) canoellatinn, t:rminntion or sue,twnsion of the contract, in whole
or in part.
(6) Inwspomtiol of Provisions: The contractor will include the provisions
of paragraph 0)through (6, in evrr. subrontract,including procure.
meets of:aatcriak and(rases of equipment,unlrs@ exempt by the Regu.
lations,o-der,or instructions imurd pur.uant tbere_o. The contractor
'ill take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement
as the State highway Department or the Bureau of Public Roads may
direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for
noncompliance:Provided,hmvevrr.that, in the event a contractor be.
comes involved in,or i%iLrentened with,litigation:with a subcontractor
or svpplirr a%a result of such direction,the contractor may request the
State to enter into such litigation to pro ect the interests of the State,
and,in addition,the contractor may request the Gaited States to enter
into such litigation to protect the interests o;the United States.
HB -349- Item I - 20
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Huntington Beach,Culifornia r.
NT*f
November 8, 1965
A11-1),Uy 1,1"y L:OUICIL
PROVE
NOV 151965 -.19
lionorable Ma.-or
and City Council
City Of Huntington Beach
Attention: Mr. Doyle Miller
City AdminiEtralcr
Subject: Relocation of WIUL_L,-ne on
EdinFPr Ave. at _11L DiL-Q Freeway
Gentlemen:
In recponre to a billing of the Division of highways
for the cost of engineering and constriction of the reloca-
tion of a waterline in Edinger Avenue for the San Diego
Freeway, we have been r"Nested to execute Utilities
Agreement No. 71Lrr_.1,0_,',.
It is requected tk,nt the Director of Public Works
be authorized to execute the agreement.
Very tr-uly yours,
James R. Wheeler
Director of Public Works
BY
11. E. Hartge
Deputy Director of Public Works
JRW:IMI:az
Item 11. - 21 HB -350-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND O.BRUN}l,Gn
DEPARTAlEN:OF PUBLIC WORKS (�
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ;
DISTRICT VII
P.O.BOX 2304.LOS ANGELES 14 +
rr
December 15, 1365 �'.
07-Ora-405 14.2/17.4
Agt. No. 7Ut-3023
07413 - o31649
City of Huntington Beach,
Water Department
P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California
Gentlemen:
Attached is fully executed copy of Utilities Agree-
ment No. 7Ut-3023 coverinF relocation of water facilities
on the San Diego Freeway, Road 07-Ora-405 14.2/17.4,
between 0.2 mile west of Brcokhuret Avenue to 0.2 mile
northwest of Beach Bout vard.
Very truly yours.
C. M. BROWN
Aset. R/H Clearance Agent
CM:dtk
Attach.
HB -35 1- Item 11. - 22
projections of demographic trends allowed the development
of infrastructure need profiles for growth through 2050 in
each of the regions and utility size categories(for the latter
fora purpose,city size was used as a proxy for utility size).
The study generally assumes that utilities continue efforts
to manage the number of main breaks that occur per mile
of pipe rather than absorb increases in pipe failures.That
.�- is,the study assumes utilities will strive to maintain current
levels of service rather than allow increasing water service
outages.We assume that each utility's objective is to make
these investments at the optimal time for maintaining current
service levels and to avoid replacing pipes while the repairs
are still cost-effective. Ideally, pipe replacement occurs at
the end of a pipe's"useful life";that is,the point in time
when replacement or rehabilitation becomes
less expensive in going forward than the costs of
numerous unscheduled breaks and associated
emergency repairs.
With this data in hand and using the assumptions
Nb
above,we projected the"typical" useful service
\ i life of the pipes in our inventory using the
"Nessie Model"TM.The model embodies pipe
� .' failure probability distributions based on
many utilities'current operating experiences,
coupled with insights from extensive research
and professional experiences with typical pipe
conditions at different ages and sizes,according to pipe material.The analysis
used seven different types of pipe in three diameters and addressed pipe
inventories dating back to 1870. Estimated typical service lives of pipes are
Figure 5:Average Estimated Service Lives by Pipe Materials(average years of service)
»lortheast Large 130 120 100 110 " 50'
$0
Midwest Large 125 120 85 110 50 100 85 55 80 105
uth Large :, 110 100 100 105 55' 100
West Large 115 100 75 110 60 105 75 70 95 75
North6ai4 MeciltI &Small' 115 120 100 110 5-5, 100 85 100 100 1
Midwest Medium&Small 125 120 85 110 50 70 70 55 80 105
South Meidiurr3, maii 105 100 100 105 55' 100 80 55 70 105
West Medium&Small 105 100 75 110 60 105 75 70 95 75
Northea t Uel rn lk 115 120' 100 120 60' 100 85 100 100 100
Midwest Very Small 135 120 85 110 60 80 75 55 80 105
South Very 5rrilt 18i3 110' 100 105 55 100 80 55 70 105
West Very Small 130 100 75 110 60 105 165 1 70 195 75
LSL indicates a relatively long service life for the material resulting from some combination of benign ground conditions and
evolved laying practices etc.
SSL indicates a relatively short service life for the material resulting from some combination of harsh ground conditions and
early laying practices,etc.
8 BURIED NO LONGER:CONFRONTING AMERICA'S WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHALLENGE
Item 11. - 23 HB _;5'1-'_
ATTACHMENT #5
City of Huntington Beach Estimate of Pipeline Depreciation Cost for OCTA Project
Depreciation Calculated in accordance with Caltrans R/W Manual Table 13.04-5
CN1106 22-inch OC-9 Pipeline
OCTA 100%liable for relocation costs
Pipeline Relocation Cost $79,365 Department of Highways Utility Agreement No.7Ut-3021,October 11,1967
Estimate of Facility Life 95 years
2011 AWWA"Buried No Longer:Confronting American's Water Infrastructure
Challenge,Figure 5,Estimated Service Lives by Pipe Material
Age of Facility 53 years As built date September 23,1963
Percentage of pipe life used 56%
Depreciation credit to OCTA $44,277
HB -353- Item 11. - 24
Table 13.04-5(Continued)
S&H CODE SECTION 705-ALLOWABLE CREDITS(Section 13.04.05.06)
Type Explanation
Salvage When relocation is required,the State shall be given credit for the value of any materials from the old
Credit facility that the Owner removes and/or retains from the construction project. Generally,such material is
either reconditioned and returned to stock or sold as scrap. Under PUC accounting regulations,Utility
Owners shall provide a credit based on the original cost.
The State is entitled to a credit for each item of material returned to stock at its current inventory price less
depreciation and less cost of reconditioning. The State is also entitled to a credit in the amount of the sales
price or,if not sold at the time of billing,the estimated value for materials sold or to be sold as scrap or
junk.
The amount of credit the State is entitled to is directly related to the percentage of liability the State pays on
the Utility Agreement. (i.e.,If the liability percentage is 1001/a State,State will receive full salvage credit.
If the liability percentage is 50%State,State will receive 50%of the salvage credit.)
The Owner must be made aware that the State will not participate in the cost of removing a facility where
the cost is greater than its salvage value unless it has to be removed for safety or aesthetic reasons. See
Section 13.04.07.09 for additional discussions of removal of hazardous material.
Accrued The State shall receive credit for accrued depreciation on the old facilities whenever the relocation of a
Depreciation facility is required. Where there are no replacement facilities,such as for abandoned facilities,credit for
Credit depreciation shall not be taken.
Accrued depreciation credit is an allowance for the value of expired service life. Expired service life is that
portion of a facility's useful life for which the Owner has received a return on their investment or benefit of
service. The credit given shall be based on straight line depreciation computed on original installed cost,
age of facility and normal expected life as reflected in the Owner's books or calculated by industry
standards. For example:
Credit= Age of Facility (Original Cost)
Normal Expected Life
The amount of credit the State is entitled to is directly related to the percentage of liability the State pays on
the Utility Agreement. (i.e.,If the liability percentage is 100%State,State will receive full accrued
depreciation credit. If the liability percentage is 50%State,State will receive 50%of the accrued
depreciation credit.)
Following are special conditions for handling accrued depreciation credits for publicly owned sewers and
private oil company facilities:
1. Publicly owned sewers-The State is not entitled to receive a credit for accrued depreciation on
relocations of publicly owned sewers.
2. Private oil companies-The State is to receive a credit for depreciation on noncommon carrier
(nonpublic utility)longitudinal facilities owned by oil companies. The State has historically calculated
accrued depreciation credit on the following basis:
• Straight-line depreciation,as with other Utility Owners,except the normal expected life will
always be 40 years,as previously agreed to by the State and the oil companies. In other words,
only for the purpose of calculating accrued depreciation credits,the subject oil facility will always
have a normal expected life of 40 years.
• Credit is not to exceed 70 percent of the original installation cost.
• When no accrued depreciation credit is provided,or the credit supplied is zero,the Owner must
supply proof of the remaining service life of the facility and a written certificate from the Owner's
comptroller or chief accountant stating that no part of the replacement facility will be capitalized
or depreciated. (See Section 13.07.06.02.)
13.04- 14(REV 9/2014)
Item 11 . - 25 xB -354-
RONALD .REAGAN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY E "Rq-x@A§n Governor
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS -.
DISTRICT 7
P. O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 90034
r
November 15, 1967
07-Ora-405 14.4/17.4
Agt. No. 7Ut-3021
City of Huntington Beach
City Hall
Post Office Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92464
Attention: Mr. E. R. Stang
Water Superintendent
Gentlemen:
Attached for your file is a fully executed copy of
Utilities Agreement No. 7Ut-3021 coveitig relocation and
encasement of a 22-inch water line crossing the San Diego
Freeway, Road 07-Ora-405 14.4/17.4, in Newland Street.
Very truly yours,
r
R. A. F SHER
Assistant Utilities
Relocation .Engineer
RR1':j b
Attachment
HB -355- Item 11. - 26
STATE OF CA11FORNIA—TRANSPORTATION AGENCY -------------
Rfl ►t , rA� orRrnor
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
DISTR?CT 7,P.O. BOX 2304,LOS ANGELES "054
November 15, 1967
07-Ora-405 14.4/17.4
Agt. No. TUt-3021
City of Huntington Beach
City Hall
Post Office Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92464
Attentions Mr. E. R. Stang
Water Superintendent
Gentlemen:
Attached for your file is a fully executed copy of
Utilities Agreement No. 7Ut-3021 coved relocation and
encasement of a 22-inch water line crossing the San Diego
Freeway, Road 07-Ora-405 14-4/17.4, in Newland Street.
Very truly yours,
R. R. FISHER
Assistant Utilities
Relocation Engineer
RRF:jb
Attachment
Item 11. - 27 HEM -3156-
INTERSTATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Dar. Co. Rn: Sic: WORZ AVT21Q l 41nQM
DEPAMCENT OF PUBLIC WORKS � 1 •� 3 '
DnKSION OF HIGHWAYS 07 Ora :�05 t l4 4 0 16 �+
Notice No. 7-4152 (Rev. ),� - --� Construction: I-405-2 96 107
Right of-:lay: I-405-2M 93
UTILITIES. AGREEMENT NO-.7.ut..-3021.....
Relocation and encasement, of a 22-inch water lino crossing the San Diego
Freeway in Newland Street. (Brookhurst Rd. to 0:2 mi.—H.E.—or of Beac}I Blvd. )
FIRST PARTY: State of California, acting by and through its Delanment of Public Works, Division of Highways,
hereinafter called STATE.' �.
SECOND PARTY:----CITY_OF HUNTINGTON BEACH._ WATER-DEPARTMENT
hereinafter called OWNER-
Relocation is i
required
of certain utility facilities of OWI M cost of which is to be borne by STATE because:
Section 703 f the Streets and Highways Code: Publicly owned
water facilities installed in freeway prior to its becoming a
State Highway.
I. Description of Work
In accordance with Notice to Relocate No. 7-4152 (Revised),
dated August 10, 1967:
A. State Highway Contractor shall install 20000 feet of
22-inch Crater line with 270 feet of 36-inch encasement
crossing the San Diego Freeway at Newland Street.
B. 0;rner shall furnish all necessary engineering plans
and specifications related to the relocation of the
22-inch water line, as set out in Item I-A above,
together with such supplemental inspection as required
to assist. State's inspection.
II. Plans and Estimates
Said work shall be pe.forned substantially in accordance with
State Highway plans as indicated below:
Plan Title Date No. of Sheets
Ora-158-Wtm,B San Diego
Freeway Newland Street
Overcrossing 7-30-62 2
and Highway Engineer's estimate dated November 22, 1963.,
and amer's estimates dated February 14, 1963 and March 27,
1967. Copies of plans and estimates are on file in the
District 07 office of the Division of Highways, 120 South
H -357- Item 11 . - 28
Spring Street, Los Angeles, 90012. Minor deviations From
{ the above-described work may be made and incidental work
relative thereto performed by the Ouner, when mutually
acceptable to both parties and upon approval by the State.
III. Relocation and Reimbursement Procedure
A. State Highway Contractor will perform all work set out
in Item I-A above. Omer agrees to perform the work
set out in Item I-B above with its ovm forces and by
t Ormer's consulting engineer.
B. The State shall pay its share of the actual cost of work
performed by a-mer and, set out In Item I-B above, after
receipt of six (6) copies of itemized bill, signed by a
responsible official of O.iner's organization, compiled
on the basis of the actual cost and expense incurred and
charged or allocated to said work, in accordance with
O.mer's regularly established accounting system; provided
the cost and expense properly attributable to work covered
by this agreement can be identified.
C. It is understood and agreed that the State will not pay
for any betterment or Increase in capacity of OSrner's
facilities in the new location and that O.•mer shall give
credit-to the State for all accrued depreciation on the
replaced facilities and the salvage value of materials
or parts salvaged and retained or sold by O:•mer.
IV. Performance of Work
It is hereby understood and agreed between the parties that
all relocation work set fcrth in Section I-A above ,and
indicated on plans designated in Section II above shall be
performed by the State under iiighrtay Contract.
V. „Acceptance by a-rner
Oemer agrees to accept the operation, use, and maintenance
of the vrater lines as constructed.
` VI. It is understood that said highway is a Federal-aid highway
t and accordingly., Bureau of Public Roads policy and Procedure
Wmorandam 30-4 is hereby incorporated into this Agreement
with the understanding that provisions governing reimburse-
ment procedures are applicable to the relationship between
the State and the United States.
VII. In order to comply with Title VI of the United States Civil
Rights Act of 1964, Appendix A is attached to and ride a part
of this Agreement,• excepting therefrom any and all front performed
by Wner's own forces.
i
I
Item 11. - 29 HB _3 8_
APPENDIX A
During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its
assignees and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contrac-
tor"), agrees as follows:
11) Compliance with Regulations: The contractor will comply with the
Regulations of the Department of Commerce relative to nondiscrimina-
tion in federally-assisted programs of the Department of Commerce
(Title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 8, hereinafter referred to
as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and
made a part of thin contract.
(2) Nondiscrimination: The eontractor, with regard to the work performed
by it after a«•ard and prior to completion of the contract trork, vrill
not discriminate on the ground of race, color, or national origin in the
selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of
materials and leases of equipment. The contractor will not'participate
either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section
8.4 of the Regulations, including employment prgctiees when the con-
tract covers a program set forth in Appendix A-II of the Regulations.
(3) Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including procurements of Materials and
Equipment: In all xolicitations either by competitive bidding or negoti-
ation made by the contractor for work to be performed under a sub-
contract, including procurements of materials or equipment, each
potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor
of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Regulations
relative to nondiscrimination on the ground of race, color or national
origin.
(4) Information and Reports: The contractor will provide all information
and reports required by the Regulations, or orders and instructions
issued pursuant thereto, and will permit access to its books, records,
accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be
determined by the State Ilighway Department or the Bureau of Public
Roads to be pertinent to ascertair_ compliance with such Regulations,
orders and instructions.Where any information required-of a contractor
is In the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish
this information, the contractor shall so.certify to the State Highway
Department, or the Bureau of Public Roads as appropriate, and shall
set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information,
(5) Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the contractor's noncom-
plianca with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract,the State
Highway Department shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the
Bureau of Public Roads may determine to be appropriate, including,
but not limited to,
(a) withholding of payments to Oe contractor under the contract until
the contractor complies, and/or
(b) cancellation, termination or suspension of the contract, in whole
or in part.
(8) Incorporation of Provisions: The contractor will include the provisions
of paragraph (1) through (6) in every subcontract, including procure-
ments of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regu•
lations, order, or instructions issued pursuant thereto. The contractor
will take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement
as the State Highway Department or the Bureau of Public Roads may
direct as a means of enforcing suck provisions including sanctions for
noncompliance: Provided, however, that, in the event a contractor be-
comes involved in,or is threatened with,litigation with a subcontractor
or supplier as a result of such direction,the contractor may request the
State to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the State,
and, in addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter
into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States,
1113 -3 9_ Item 11. - 30
�r�ltrrrrs•wai+ra�rr�+b /� K'+'�'��r"w�7�'r'��� _ NwM
Cost to State of work to be done by
State t to Highway Contractor 67,715.00
Cost to State of work to be done by Nner 11,650.00
Estimated Cast to STATE #..T.9.r365,00..
work described in Item I-B
OWNER agrees to perform and STATE agrees to pay for thythM e_ "Uk in accordance with.._.................._._..._..
...tp.zn:....a .this..A �emnt.._.STATE..agrees.. a..per�nr ..and.ta...�ay..fox_..and.....
(7,,= agrees to accept and maintain the work described in Item I-A
abQxe..�..._..............._.._...._ �-...:__ ...___ ...._.._.._.�..___..._.._._...._....._. ..._...... _.. _......_........
IN FITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this agreement the day and year first above written.
CITY OF IrUNTINOTON BEACIi
DEPART..._.
MM
4PIPALRPCOMME� ....
ED: ..._...... ....J.$?I!e. ._Rye. eeleX.. ...............�. ......_...
Director of Pub3.ic Works
_ i Kg Right o!Si'ry Ag �....._... $ .....».. _.»..............__...__. �_.—_.._...__..._. ... _....
Right of Irdy Ck rmce agent Owner....
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
APPROVED' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC VJKS'I 10 OFklC.6. MACDONALD
i --r--�
c6wf Rig :G W07 Agent Deputy District Engineer
NOV 9 1367
RRF:ib
Item 11. - 31 1 -360-
�° Sr
projections of demographic trends allowed the development
of infrastructure need profiles for growth through 2050 in
- each of the regions and utility size categories(for the latter
purpose,city size was used as a proxy for utility size).
x' The study generally assumes that utilities continue efforts
to manage the number of main breaks that occur per mile
of pipe rather than absorb increases in pipe failures.That
is,the study assumes utilities will strive to maintain current
M levels of service rather than allow increasing water service
outages.We assume that each utility's objective is to make
.., these investments at the optimal time for maintaining current
service levels and to avoid replacing pipes while the repairs
are still cost-effective. Ideally, pipe replacement occurs at
the end of a pipe's"useful life';that is,the point in time
when replacement or rehabilitation becomes
less expensive in going forward than the costs of
numerous unscheduled breaks and associated
emergency repairs.
With this data in hand and using the assumptions
above,we projected the"typical" useful service
3` life of the pipes in our inventory using the
"Nessie Model"TM The model embodies pipe
"n
failure probability distributions based on
many utilities'current operating experiences,
coupled with insights from extensive research
- and professional experiences with typical pipe
conditions at different ages and sizes, according to pipe material.The analysis
used seven different types of pipe in three diameters and addressed pipe
inventories dating back to 1870. Estimated typical service lives of pipes are
Figure 5:Average Estimated Service Lives by Pipe Materials(average years of service)
Northeast Large 130 120 100 110 50 80 90 100 100 100
Midwest Large 125 120 85 110 50 100 85 55 80 105
South Large 110 100 100 105 55 100 80 55 70 105
West Large 115 100 75 110 60 105 75 70 95 75
Northeast Medium&Small 115 120 100 110 55 100 85 100 100 100
Midwest Medium&Small 125 120 85 110 50 70 70 55 80 105
South Medium&Small 105 100 100 105 55 100 80 55 70 105
West Medium&Small 105 100 75 110 60 105 75 70 95 75
Northeast Very Small 115 120 100 120 60 100 85 100 100 100
Midwest Very Small 135 120 85 110 60 80 75 55 80 105
South Very Small 130 110 100 105 55 100 80 55 70 105
West Very Small 130 100 75 110 60 105 65 70 95 75
LSL indicates a relatively long service life for the material resulting from some combination of benign ground conditions and
evolved laying practices etc.
SSL indicates a relatively short service life for the material resulting from some combination of harsh ground conditions and
early laying practices,etc.
8 BURIED NO LONGER:CONFRONTING AMERICA'S WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHALLENGE
xB -361- Item 11. - 32
j6jkGnMLN I ' ifo
j
r♦
CD
CC 1520,22-INCH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RELOCATION,OCTA CN1106.
W Estimate of costs for plan check of OCfA Design Build Contractor.Assume 3-each Submittals.
Assume 6-each Monthly Coordination Meetings
Assume 6-each Design Coordination Meetings
Estimate of costs for Operations and Maintenance Labor for OCTA Relocation of pipeline.Cost Include pipeline Isolation,pipeline flushing,and Pipeline Testing.
Estimate of cost for Construction Inspection of 22-Inch pipeline
Estimate of cost for water for pipeline flushing.
WATER WATER WATER WATER MAINT
UTILITY PRINCIPAL SENIOR ASSISTANT ENGINEERING PRODUCTION DISTRIBUTION WATER CREW QUALITY WATER DIST SERVICE MET WATER TOTAL COST
MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER INTERN SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR INSPECTOR LEADER SUPERVISOR LEADWORKER SERVICE ACRE FOOT
Task TASK DESCRIPTION WORKER
1 Submittals 9 24 24 6 6 12 12 12 6
2 Monthly Coordination Meetings 9 9 9 9
3 Construction Design Meeting 9 9 9 9
4 Construction Inspection 80 6
5 O&M Labor 12 100 100
6 Project Approval 2 2 4 4 4
Total Hours 11 44 46 6 6 34 34 80 24 12 100 100
7 Water VOLUME 1.03
Cost $ 1,757.36 $6,856.52 $6,049.46 $ 633.54 $ 70.92 $ 3,948.42 $ 3,948A2 j 5 8,362.40 $2,281.92 $ 1,393.56 j$ 8,607.00 $6,740.00 j $1,028.10 j$51,677.62
Imo. Contingency 15% $ 7,751.64
Total Cost $55,42927.
Hourly Rotes/Unit Cost $ 159.76 $ 155.83 1$ 131.51 $ 105.59 1$ 11.82 $ 116.13 $ 116.13 $ 104.53 $ 95.08 $ 116.13 $ 86.07 1$ 67.40 $ 1,000.00
CT
N
I
WATER ESTIMATE
LENGTH OF PIPE ISOLATED 1700 LF PRV @ EDINGER TO HEIL
PIPE DIAMETER 22-INCH
CROSS SECTION AREA 2.64 SO FT
VOLUME PIPE 4487.7 CU FT
TURN WATER X-TIMES 10 PIPE VOULMES
FLUSH VOLUME 44876.7
FLUSH VOLUME 1.03 AC FT
ATTACHMENT #7
CC iS21,12-INCH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RELOCATION,OCTA CN1241
Estimate of costs for plan check of OCTA Design Build Contractor.Assume 3-each Submittals.
Assume 6-each Monthly Coordination Meetings
Assume 6-each Design Coordination Meetings
Estimate of costs for Operations and Maintenance Labor for OCTA Relocation of pipeline.Cost include pipeline isolation,pipeline flushing,and Pipeline Testing.
Estimate of cost for Construction Inspection of 12-inch pipeline
Estimate of cost for water for pipeline flushing.
WATER WATER WATER WATER MAINT MET
UTILITY PRINCIPAL SENIOR ASSISTANT ENGINEERING WATER WATER DIST SERVICE
MANAGER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER INTERN PRODUCTION DISTRIBUTION INSPECTOR CREW QUALITY LEADWORKER SERVICE WATER TOTAL COST
Task TASK DESCRIPTION SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR LEADER SUPERVISOR WORKER ACRE FOOT
1 Submittals 9 24 24 6 6 12 12 12 6
2 Monthly Coordination Meetings 9 9 9 9
3 Construction Design Meeting 9 9 9 9
4 Construction Inspection 80 6
S O&M Labor 12 100 100
6 Project Approval 2 2 4 4 4
Total Hours 11 44 46 6 6 34 34 80 24 12 100 100
7 Water VOLUME 0.33
Cost $ 1,757.36 $6,856.52 $6,049.46 $ 633.54 $ 70.92 $ 3,948.42 $ 3,948.42 $8,362.40 $2,281.92 $ 1,393.56 $ 8,607.00 $6,740.00 $332.87 $50,982.39
Contingency 15% $ 7,64736
Total Cost $58,629,75'i
67wf Hourly Rates/Unit Cost $ 159.76 $ 155.83 $ 131.51 $ 105.59 1$ 11.8215 116.13 15 116.131$ 104.53 15 95.08 $ 116.13 $ 86.07 IS 67AO 15 1,000.00
°r3
r
WATER ESTIMATE
LENGTH OF PIPE ISOLATED 1850 LF
PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) 12 in
CROSS SECTION AREA 0.79 SQ FT
VOLUME PIPE 1453.0 CU FT
TURN WATER X-TIMES 10 PIPE VOULMES
FLUSH VOLUME 14529.9
FLUSH VOLUME 0.33 AC FT
H
t"r
I�
' City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street ♦ Huntington Beach, CA 92648
(714) 536-5227 ♦ www.huntingtonbeachea.gov
pfB.-^17 1999 PO. �
Office of the City Clerk
Robin Estanislau, City Clerk
February 22, 2017
Kendall Zirkel, Senior Project Manager
Orange County Transportation Authority
550 South Main Street
P. O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863-1584
Dear Ms. Zirkel:
Enclosed are two originals each of the "Orange County Transportation Authority Utility
Agreement" Nos. UK041106 and UK 041241.
Upon complete execution, please return a fully executed original of each Utility Agreement
to us. Please mail the document to:
Robin Estanislau
City Clerk
2000 Main Street, 2�d Floor
Huntington Beach CA 92648
Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
4q4U ��4444,40
Robin Estanislau, CIVIC
City Clerk
RE:pe
Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan ♦ Waitakere, New Zealand