HomeMy WebLinkAboutPARSON, BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE & DOUGLAS, INC - 1986-05-05 REQUE , FOR CITY COUNCI' ACTION
vim+.
Date April 25, 1986
Submitted to: Honor�.ble Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Charles Thompson, City Administrat r
Prepared by: Paul E. Cook, Director of Public Works\�'�� �`� G
Subject: Approval of Consultant Agreement; Edwards re Stiafl C.C. 504
Consistent with Cuuncil Policy? Yes [ ] New Policy or Excention
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
The computer analysis of Edwards Street and the circulation system in
the Ellis-Goldenwest Study Area needs to be performed as part �f the
planning study activities.
RECOi iMENDAT I ON:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached Engineering
Services Agreement with Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc.
for a cost not to exceed $7300.00.
ANALYSIS:
As part of the analysis of alternatives to be considered in planning
the developement of the Ellis-Golderwest area, the future of the road
system generally and a portion of Edwards Street in particular was
identified as requiring analysis by the Huntington Beach Transportation
Demand Model (HBTDM) . The model was originally developed for this
purpose :;nd has been updated with the current planned developementc of
the Bolsa Chica area. The cost of this contract will cover additional
updates to the model, analysis of the results of "exercising," the
model, and analysis of specific road clignments defined in the agree-
ment.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Funds for this project are availabl_ in the Gas Tax Fund in Account
No. 745040.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Do not approve the Engineering Services Agreement.
I
ATTACHMENTS:
Engineering Services Agreement
I
r
PIO 4/84
r
DD I Per"ns 2323 North Broadway
Brinr-&erhoN Suite 200
Quade& Santa Ana Financial Center
Douglas,Inc. Santa Ana,CA 92706
714-973-4880
Engineers
Architects
Planners
i.
A pril 24, 1966
Mr. Paul Cook
Director of Public Works
City of HunLLngton Beach
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mr. Cook-
AttacLed iv the exccuted Agreement for the Edwards Street Study. In accordance
with Article 10, Parsons Brinckerhoff has insurance as specified. We have requested
our insurance carrier to issue a Certificate of Insurance naming the City of
Huntington Beach as an additional insured. Such certificate will be forwarded to
you upon receipt.
Sir,�-erely,,
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QUADE & DOUGLAS, INC.
i4icha� I. Schneider
Senior Vice President
attach m ent
if
A Century of
,Engineering Exceftence
t
CITY OF HUNTINGTON
2000I4�HIN STREET CALIFORNIA -i2648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
May 6, 1986
Darius S. Irani
Manager, Transportation and Environmental Services
Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Ouade & Douglas, Inc.
2323 N. Broadway ;200
Santa Ana, CA 92706
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach approved an
engineering services agreement with your firm for the Edwards
Street Study - ProJect CC-504, on May 5, 1986.
Uoon receipt of your Certificate of Insurance, a duly executed
copy will be forwarded to you.
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
AMW:C,B:bt
CC: Don Noble, Public Works
,
i
9
(Tslsphano;714-536-5227)
0• i - ISSUE DATE(MAiIDD/YY)
E
O 11/17/86
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
ALEXANDER & ALEXANDER INC.
11.85 AVENUE OF ''HE AMERICAS COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036
COMPANY A
254 LETTERCONTINENTAL S ALTY COMPANY
COMPANY
;NSURED LETTER IS
qPORTATTON INSURANCE COMPANY
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QUADE & DOUGLAS I&C COMPANYLETTER c
ONE PENN PLAZA
250 WEST 34TH S`TRELT i COMPANV O %�lLETTER
NEW YORK, NE,l YORK 101_-9 t INS
COMPANYr
i LETTER , r' AMENDED
0
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR TuE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY T.
BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS.EXCLUSIONS,AND CONOI•
TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
CO PCCCf EFFEC-N x E iLCY EXPIRATION LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
LTR) TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUM9cR I DA'E MM,DOIYY, JATE MWDONY, EACH
_ ')CCURRENCE AGGREGATE
GENERAL LIABILITY —�
BODILY
A X COMPREHENSIVE FORM CCP001704870 11/1/86 I 11/l/87 INJURY $ $
X PREMISLIOPERATIONS (INCLUDES TEXAS AUTO) i PROPERn
JNUERGROUND DAMAGE $ $
X CX0LOSION S COLLAPSE HAZARO
og000CTSICOMPLETED OPERATIONS
I X CONTRACTUAL COMB NED }•
X NDEPENOENT CONTRAC.ORS 1, 00 1 OOO
X I'BROAD FORM P-FJPERTY DAMAGE 1,000
i PERSONAL INJURY I I PERSONAL INJURY $
LAUTOMOGILE LIABILITY
A' X I ANY AUTO BUA 001704874 11/1/86 11/1/8 7 j z Rx— ,$
i ALL OWNED AUTOS WRIV PASS, (EXCLUDES TEXAS AUTO) 101.'
~�AL,OWNED AUTOS(OTHER SSN ! ��IXI+r I$A � I
TIRED AUTOS I
'PROPERTY
NON-OWNED AUTOS i DAMAGE $ !
71 GARAGE UASIL'TY �T
CO
!a�aM P B ION $ 1 000
EXCESS LIABILITY
JMBRELL ORM P
C d D
COMatNED $ $
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA CORM i
I STATUTORY
WORKERS'COMPENSATION
B� WC 001704862 11/1/55 11/1/87 $ +EACHACCIDENTI
AND
$ ron IOISEA.SE POLICY LIMIT)
EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY
I $ rnn I DISEASE EACH EMPLOYEE)
OTHER —�—�
t
t
I '
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
RE: HUNTINGTON BEACH PARKING AN-D TRANSIT STUDY PB JOB 3878. (SEE BACK)
o • .a• s
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVL DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CA.`--'CELLED BEFORE THE EX-
DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILLx6hPMX6SD=
MAIL
am
WRITTEN NOTII:E TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERMiQQ�[j{M,
MR. JAbiES PALIN DIR. DEVEL. SERV. qft�. �y}�y¢p � � ptp�DGt
P.O. BOX 190 x
AUTHOR ZE PRESENTATIVE
fi'NPINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 7 (_b1_l- _ ol
a
ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND
PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE & DOUGLAS, IZTC.
FOR EDWARDS STPEF,T STUDY
ThIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day
of 19,Colf by and betv=.een the CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEA H, a municipal corporattlan of the State of
California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY, " and Parsons,
Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc. , a New York corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of an engineer-
ing cons -ltant to provide an alignment-classification study of
Edwards Street in the City of Huntington Beach; and
CONTRACTOR has been selected to perform said services,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONTRACTOR as
follows:
1. WORK STATEMENT
CONTRACTOR shall provide all enginee-ing services as
described in the Request for Pi3posal and Statement of
Qualifications (hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A") , which
is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this
reference. Said services shall sometimes hereinafter be
referred to as "PROJECT. " S
CONTRACTOR hereby designates Darivs S. Iran-' , who shall
represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all
co. •iltations with CITY during the rerformance of this Agreement.
CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE
CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly
with CONTRACTOR in the prosecution of this Agreement.
�4
a
3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services
of the CONTRACTOR are to commence as soon as practicable after
the execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in
Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than six (6) weeks from
the date of this Agreement. These times may be extended with
the written permission of 0' : CITY. The time 2or performance of
the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be aa. shown
in the Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Sct_edule.
This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mut4ally
agreed by the CITY and CONTRACTOR.
4. COMPENSATION
In consideration of the performance of the engineerinc
services described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay
CONTRACTOR a fee of Seven-Thousand, Three-Hundred Dollars
($7,300.00) .
5. EXTRA WORK
In the event of authorization, in writing by the CITY,
of changes from the work described in Exhibit "A", or for other
written permission authorizing additional work not contemplated
herein, additional compensation shall be allowed for such Extra
Work, so long as the prior written approval of CITY is obtained.
6. METHOD OF PAYMENT
A. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to progress payments
toward the fixed fee set forth in Section 4 herein in accordance
with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit A" .
B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every techni-
cal memo and report prepared by CONTRACTOR shall be submitted to
the CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In
the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY
shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory comple-
,f
(2)
tion. Any such product which has not been formally accepted or
rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted.
C. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to the CITY an invoice
for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall:
1) Reference this Agreement;
2) Describe the services performed;
3; Show the total amount of the payment due;
4) Include a certification by a principal member
of the CONTRACTOR'S firm that the work has
been performed in accordance with the provi-
sions of this Agreement; and
5) For all payments include an estimate of the
percentage of work completed.
Upon submission of any such invoice, tf CITY is
satisfied that CONTRACTOR is ma}.ing satisfactory progress toward
completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY
shall promptly approve the invoice, in. which event pa-%7ment shall
be made within thirty (30) days' of receipt of the invoice by
CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If the
CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONTRACTOR
in writing of the reasons for non--approval, wit?l.in sever_ (7)
calendar d4ys of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of
performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until
the parties agree that past performance by CONTRACTOR is in, or
has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is
terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof.
9
Y
D. Any billings for extra work or =,dditional
services authorized by the CITY sha.Li be invoiced separately to
the CITY. Such invoice shall con' ,in all of the information
required under paragraph 6C, and in addition shall list the
hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such
invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in
accordance with the extra work or additional services requested,
and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and
(3) k
costs -.ncurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unrea-
sonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning
payment of s)?ch an invoice shall be treated as _separate and
apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this
Agreement.
7. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
CITY acknowledges that CONTRACTOR'S plans and
specifications are Instruments of professional service;
nevertheless CONTRACTOR agrees that all materials prepared
hereunder, including all original drawings, designs, reports,
both field and office notes, calculations, traps and other
documents shall be turned over to CITY anO shall become its
property upon PROJECT completion or earlier termination of this
Agreement. In the event this Agreement is terminated, said
materials may be used by CITY in completion of the PROJECT;
however, CITY agrees to hold harmless, indemnify and defend
CONTRACTOR against all damages, claims and losses, including
defense costs, arising out of CTTY' S re-use of CONTRACTOR'S
plans and specifications, except in the completion of the
PROJECT in the case of termination hereof, without CONTRACTOR'S
prior written authorizatiun.
8. INDEMNIFICATION, DEFENSE, HOLD HARMLESS
CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold
harmless CITY, its officers and employees from and against any
and all liability, damages, costs, losses, claims and expenses,
however caused, arising from CONTRACTOR'S negligence or willful
misconduct in the performance of this Agreement. Any concurrent
negligence or willful misconduct of CITY, its officers and
employee— shall in no way diminish CONTRACTOR'S obligations
hereunder .
9. WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the pro-:.Lsions of
the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State
of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of
the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all
(4)
b
similar state or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all
claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and
judgments of every nature and description, including attorney' s
fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against CITY, for
or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may
be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONTRACTOR
under this Agreement.
10. INSURANCE
In addition to the Workers' Compensation Insurance and
CONTRACTOR' S covenant to indemnify CITY, CONTRACTOR shall obtain
and furnish to CITY the following insurance policies covering
the PROJECT:
General Liability Insurance. A policy of general
public liability insurance, including motor vehicle
coverage. Said policy shall indemnify CONTRACTOR, its
officers, agents and employees, while acting within the
scope of their duties, against any and all claims of
arising out of or in connection with the PROJECT, and
shall provide coverage in not less than the following
amount: combined single limit bodily injury or
property damage of $1,000,000 per occurrence. Said
policy shall name CITY, its officers and employees as
Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide
that any other insurance coverage which may be
applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed exce:=s
coverage and that CONTRACTOR'S insurance shall be
primary.
Professional Liability Insurance.
WAIVED
Certificates of Insurance for said policies shall be
approved in writing by the City Attorney prior to the commence-
(5)
ment of any work hereunder. Prior to commencement of work
hereunder, CONTRACTOR shall provide CITY its written
certification that it has no claim currently pending under said
policies. All Certificates of Insurance (and the policies of
insurance or endorsements thereof) shall provide that any such
Certificates and policies shall not be cancelled or reduced in
coverage or limits other than payments of claims without: thirty
(30) days ' prior written notice to CITY. CONTRACTOR shall
notify CITY immediately if and when any of said policies is
reduced in coverage or limits due to payment of a claim by its
insurance carrier.
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTOR is, and shall be, acting at all times in the
performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor.
CONTRACTOR shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for
any and all payments of all taxes, social security, state
disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and
other payroll deductions for CONTRACTOR and its officers, agents
and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection
with the services to be performed hereunder.
12. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
All work required hereunder shall be performed in
accordance with the standards of the profession for similar
professionals performing services in this area at this time.
CITY may terminate CONTRACTOR'S services hereunder at any time
with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully
complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be
made in writing through the City Engineer, notice of which shall t
be delivered to CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 16 her—ein.
13. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING
This Agreement is a personal service contract and the AI
supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONTRACTOR
to any other person or entity without the consent of CITY.
i
a
(6)
14. COPYRIGHTS,/PATENTS
CONTRACTOR shall not apply for a patent or copyright on
any item or material produced as a result of this Agreement, as
set forth in 41 CFR 1-9.1.
15. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS
CONTRACTOR shall employ no CITY official nor any
regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this
Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any
financial interest in this Agreement in violation of California
Government Code Sections 1090 et seq.
16. NOTICES
Any notices or special instructions required to be
given in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by
personal c?elivery to CONTRACTOR'S agent (as designated in
Secti,n 1 hereinabove) or to CITY'S Director of Public Works, as
the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a
sealed envelope, postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the
United States Postal Services, addressed as follows:
TO CITY: TO CONTRACTOR:
Mr. Paul Cook Darivs S. Irani
Director of Public Works Mgr. , Transportation and
City of Huntington Beach Environmental Services
2000 Main Street Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade &
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Douglas, Inc.
2323 N. Broadway, Suite 200
Santa Ana, CA 92706
fi
--REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK--
f'
i
(7)
1.7. ENTIRETY
The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set
forth the entire Agreement between the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized
officers the day, month and year first above written.
CONTRACTOR: PARSONS, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,
BRINCKERHOFF, QUADE & DOUGLAS A municipal corporation
INC, of the State of California
------------------------------
a New York rpora�tion
r
Schnee er -'-
Sr. Vice Pre ident Mayor
Lee Fox- Z47 "i
i
ATTEST: APP OVFD AS Tq FOR
Cif=?�n�G�✓�1!/' �i�
City Clerk a�GG Clt& Attorney
9 D
REVIEW AND APPROVED: INZZIATED AND APPROVED:
City Admina.str or Director of Public Works
f
z
(8)
REQUEST FOR QUOTATION- EDWARDS AVENUE STUDY
I ntro du tion
The City of Huntington Beach is engaged in a planning process which involves the
alignment and classification of arterial highways within the study area. The study area is
bounded on the east by Delaware Street on the west by Springdale Street, -n the north by
Slater Avenue, and on the south by Yorktown Avenue, Palm Avenue, and Pacific Coast
Highway. Exnibit No. 1 shows the study area.
Land use decisions and the alignment of most of the roadwk-. have been considered, and
tentative agreement reached at staff level on the majority of these matters. Exhibit#I
also shows these conditions and alignments.
Tasks to be Performed
The consulting firm performing the work on this project will be required to present
definitive responses to the following questions:
1. Is Edwards Street between Garfield Avenue and Talbert Avenue a required element of
the traffic circulation system, i.e. if deleted, can the remainder of the system (as
presently constituted and/or cla-sified) adequately handle the resulting travel
patterns?
2. Assuming Edwards to continue to connect to Garfield Avenue, if the intersection of
Edwards Street at Garfield Avenue and Seaview Street at Garfield Avenue were
offset by 200 to 500 feet, what effect could be anticipated relative to driver behavior
in using the available north-south routes parallel to Edwarder Street, i.e. would drivers
choose to use Goldenwest, Springdale, or other north-south streets, once forced to
turn onto Garfield Avenue?
The tasks to be accomplished to answer these questions may include, but are not limits
to, the following:
A. Consider the existing travel demand model(s)developed for the area in question and
the City of Huntington Beach generally.
s
B. Adjust and revise the model(s) to reflect the l-nd uses and road alignments shown on
Exhibit No. 1. i
i
C. Adjust and revise the model(s)to reflect the current applicable planning within the
area known as the Bolse Chica, including land use and road alignments.
D. Consult with the Community Development, Community Services, and Public Works t
Departments to determine if any other changes to community land uses, recreation
f:i ilities,or road alignments will require additional adjustments to the madels(s).
e
c
EXHIBIT
�. Oil, za
E. With all revisions and adjustments completed, exercise the model(s)for each
configuration to be considered. The target year for the project is 2005.
F. Describe the results of each"run" of the model(s) in term of Level of Service, both at
major intersections and within segments of the road system in the study area. Also
nonsider and compare the adopted road classifications with the predicted traffic
volumes generated by each model run.
G. Considering the results obtained in Tasks A thru F, and others performed but not
mentioned herein, formulate answers for questions t and 2 posed previously.
Proposal Requirements and Due Date
Consultant submittal shall be in letter format, with attachments as deemed appropriate to
explain/clarify proposal. For the purpose of this project, consultant is not expected to
prepare extensive material ("boilerplate") relating to the qualifications or experience of
the firm or its associates.
"he proposal shall contain the method of approach to I--e used by the consultant, the
personnel who will perform the analysis, the minimum time in which the project could be
completed, and the cost to perform expressed as a "not-to-exceed"cost.
Proposals are due at the Public Works Department no later than 5:30 p.m. on Friday, April
11, 1986. Questions regarding the project should b3 directed to Bruce Gilmer at
536-5431. if mailed, proposals should be addressed to:
Traffic Division - Attn: Bruce Gilmer
Public Works Department
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach CA 92648
The envelop- should also be marked "Edwards Avenue Study" for clarity.
Attachments: Ex.N bit No. 1 -Study Area Map
Flow Map - 1985
t
rS
3
Y
iy
0486g
j
.: -2
Parsons 2323 North Broadway
arlackerholf Suite 200
� W�lZl 100 Quads-3 Santa Ana Financial Center
YEARS Douglas,Inc. Santa Ana,CA 92706
714-973-4680
Engineers
Architects
Planners
April 17, 1986
Mr. Bruce Gilmer
Traffic Engineer
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Subject: Edwards Street Study
Dear Mr. Gilmer:
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Request for Quotation on the Edwards
Avenue Study. We have assembled a team of professionals who have the expertise and
breadth of experience necessary to competently perform the technical analysis, while
being sensitive to local conditions in the study area. These individuals are available to
conduct this study immediately, in accordance with the requirements for timeliness
noted in your letter.
We have included in this letter, responsive to your request, a description of our
proposed scope of services, a brief introduction to the personnel selected to conduct
this study, a discussion of the required schedule, and an estimate of cost to complete
the study. Included with this letter are complete resumes for the key personnel
assigned to the project, plus a brief description of the related experience which
particularly qualifies Parsons Brinckerhoff to undertake this assignment. We have
directed our scope of cervices to accomplish the required work in the minimum amount
of time. For some items in the scope, we have also listed optional approaches which
would be more time consuming, but which also may provide the City with more
detailed information. We feel, however, that the proposed scope of services will
provide vary satisfactory answers to the City's questions about Edwards Street, in the
minimum amount of time.
As you are aware, Parsons Brinckerhoff was responsible for development of the City of
Huntington Beach Transportation Demand Model (HBTDM), as well as the traffic
model analysis of alternatives fur the Bolsa Chica, which utilized the HBTDM. We
possess the documentation used in setting up the HBTDM, as well as the
docdmentation of alternative circulation schemes tested for the Bolsa Chica; also the
data from the most recent Bolsa Chica model runs are available on our computer
tapes.
A Century of
£ngineering lEacelience
EXHIBIT 1"Al;°
CiDlli�ll�
100
YEARS
Mr. Bruce Gilmer
April 17, 1985
Page 2
PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES
Traffic Demand Model
For conducting the traffic forecasts for the study area, we propose utilizing the City
of Huntington Beach Transpo^tation Demand Model. We feel that the City's adopted
model is the most appropriate tool for use in this study for several reasons:
a The model is structure includes a finer zone system and more specific
street network structure in the study area than other models such as the
county-wide OCTAM traffic model.
e Modifications to the model which reflect proposed land use and circulation
system improvements in the Bolsa Chica area have already been coded and
tested with the .Huntington Beach model.
a The HBTDM is specifically designed for analysis of Huntington Beach
traffic, and includes a data base which has been successfidly used to
project future transportation needs in Huntington Beach.
An optional feature which could be included in this study would be to disaggregate
some of the traffic zones within the study area to provide a more refined traffic
assignment. This option, however, would require significant input from City staff in
breaking down the land use within existing zones, and would not necessarily improve
the sensitivity of the model's traffic volume assignments in the study area.
Prior to running the traffic model, ne"work revisions :would be made to reflect the
alternative circulation proposals within the study area, as-well as adopted circulation
improvements for thi: Bolsa Chica area, and any other network modifications which
could affect the results of this analysis. The coded network modifications for the
Bolsa Chica area are already available on computer tape from our firm's earlier
involvement in the Bolsa Chica analysis; that network may need to be modified
somewhat to reflect the adopted circulation element of the Bolsa Chica Local Coastal
Program (December, 1985). Additionally, we would meet with City staff (Community
Development, Community Services, and Public Works Departments) to ascertain the
need for any other network modifications.
The target year for our analysis will be 2005. Since the most recent model runs of the
HBTDM utilize a horizon year of 1995, adjustments wi-'_ he necessary in order to
project Year 2005 traffic volumes. City staff has indicated that, with a few
exceptions, land use is not expected to change significantly by the ]`ear 2005.
Therefore, tine will use the coded 1995 land use as the basis for the model runs. If the g
most recent Bolsa Chica model runs do not reflect the land use in the adopted LCP,
necessary updates to the land use base will be made. During our initial meetings with
City staff, we will collect revised land use data for those areas where significant
changes are anticipated.
A Century of
Engineering Excellence
"t; ;'+i°tr:3+iy,sr.> _v±+w"rEa•• .,,,.� ..._. Y,�: .._: ..., c. .uM,':=+.:
9�RS
Mr. Bruce Gilmer
April 17, 1986
Page 3
The traffic model will be tested with either two or three alternative networks in the
study area; in the analysis phase of the study, the model results will be adjusted as
necessary to produce traffic assignments for all of the potential circulation system
alternatives in the study area. For several reasons, it does not seem necessary (or a
wise use of time and money) to run the computer model for each possible network
alternative:
1. The model produces an all-or-nothing assignment of total daily traffic.
Therefore, the model outputs will have to be adjusted to reflect a
reasonable allocation of traffic to individual arterial streets in the study
area.
2. When the model was developed, it may not have been calibrated for the
individual streets in this study area. This is another reason why the raw
model outputs may need to be adjusted to reflect a reasonable allocation of
traffic to individual streets.
t
3. Since the model performs an all-or-nothing assignment, coding a slight jog
in the alignment of Edwards Street and Seaview Street will probabl-. not
divert traffic to other routes in the model. The effects of this alignment
should be analyzed outside the constraints of the model, so there is no
sense in using computer time to test this alternative.
In summary, the overall traffic projections required to adequately test all of the
available options can be obtained from two or three carefully-selected model runs, so
we propose to limit the computer analysis to that number.
Anglysis
The alternative street alignments being considered for the study area will be combined
into a number of consistent circulat:,*)n system network alternat#ves for the purpose of
analysis. For each alternative network, a projection of 2005 traffic volumes within
the study area will be prepared, adjusting the raw traffic assignments from the model
runs as necessary to produce a reasonable allocation of traffic on individual streets in
the study area. For each alternative, the Year 2005 level of service for each road
segment within the study area will be calculated, as well as the level of service at
major intersections. The level of service computation will be based on the traffic
capacity associated with each street's adopted classification.
From the analysis of Year 2005 traffic volumes and level of service, the need for
Edwards Street between Garfield Avenue and Talbert Avenue will be determined. If 1
the arterial streets within the study area have sufficient traffic capacity to
accommodate their projected traffic without Edwards Street, it would not be an f
essential element of the traffic circulation system. If the other arteria'_ streets do not
have sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic diverted by the elimination of
Edwards Street, a discussion of necessary modifications to the circulation system will E
be provided.
A Century of
Engineering Excelicnce
9®YEARS
Mr. Bruce Gilmer
April 17, 1986
Page 4
The second part of the analysis, assuming that Edwards Street is connected to Garfield
Avenue, will consider the effect of offsetting the intersections of Edwards Street and
Seaview Street at Garfield Avenue. As noted above, a model run which includes the
offset intersection would probably not show any traffic being diverted to the alternate
parallel arterials. Therefore, this analysis will be based on travel desire projections
from the model data, combined with considerations of driver tendencies and our
observations in similar situations elsewhere.
Report
The methodology and findings of this analysis will be documented in a draft report.
After review and comment by the City, a final report will be prepared which
incorporates and addresses the comments.
PERSONNEL
To conduct this study, we have assembled a team of exr,erts with the necessary
technical expertise, familiarity with conditions in Huntington Beach, and near-term
availability to undertake the work. Complete resumes are include with this proposal
We ;have designated Mr. James Douglas to serve as the Project Manager on this study.
Mr. Douglas has a broad understanding of the requirements of circulation planning, as
well as an understanding of conditions in Huntington Beach and a background in traffic
modeling. His modeling background includes experience with the Huntington Beach
Transportation Demand Model, the Orange County Multimodal traffic model, and a
large number of microcomputer based traffic models. His work in Huntington Beach
includes primary roles in the Beach Boulevard Super Streets Demonstration Project;
the Downtown Huntington Beach Parking, Transit, and Financing Study; and the
Huntington Center Traffic Impact Study. He is also familiar with the current
circulation plans for the Bolsa Chica area.
Mr. Darius S. Irani will be available as necessary to provide policy input and
coordination with pu1buc agencies. As the project manager of the Beach Boulevard
Super Streets Demonstration Project, Mr. Irani has become very familiar with
circulation objectives and policy within the City of Huntington Beach.
To conduct the traffic modeling work, we have included on our team Mr. Dale Iwai of
.DHI,A.ssociates. Mr. Iwai has an extensive background in computer traffic modeling,
including primary roles developing the Huntington Beach Transportation Demand
Model, the Orange County Multimodal traffic model, and a number of other mainframe
transportation demand models. He is very familiar with UTPS modeling procedures, as
well as the inputs and procedures used in the HBTDM.
A Century o/
Englneering Excellence
VFAHS
Mr. Bruce Gilmer
April17, 1.986
Page 5
SCHEDULE
Assuming that we received notice to proceed on April 21, we estimate the earliest
possible date for delivery of a draft report to the City to be May 16, 1986.
COST
Based on the proposed scope of services, the estimated cost is $7,300.00.
If the City desires to disaggregate the traffic zones within the study area, $300.00
would be added to the estimated cost (and City staff would need to disaggregate the
land use forecasts into the Pew zone format).
If more than three computer model runs are desired for testing the alternatives, the
cost would be approximately $450.00 per run.
t
CONCLUSION
We are very excited about the opportunity to work again with the City of Huntington
Beach, and particularly to provide this important analysis for the City's circulation
system. We have assembled a team of experts which is familiar with Huntington
Beath and the City traffic model, and can provide the services required in the timely
fashion which is needed for this study. We feel that our previous work has
demonstrated our ability to provide a high level of quality and professional responsibil-
ity in similar assignments locally and nationwide. We would welcome the opportunity
to provide such services to the City of Huntington Beach. Please feel free to call J.D.
Douglas or me at(714) 973-4880 should any questions arise regarding this proposal
Very truly yours,
PARSONS,BRINCKERHOFF QUADE & DOUGLAS, INC.
I
Darius S. Irani
Manager, Transportation and Environmental Services
x
Enclosures:
DSI:tp
A Century of
(Engineering Excellence
RELATED EXPERIENCE
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QUADS & DOUGLAS, INC.
RELATED EXPERIENCE
SUPER STREETS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT BEACH BOULE�.l 1D CORRIDOR -
ORANGE COUNT', CALIFORNIA
Parsons Brinckerhoff is providing professional services to the Orange County Trans-
portation Commission in connection with the Super Streets Demonstration Project for
1.9.5 miles of Beach Boulevard (State Route 39). The corridor passes through ten local
jurisdictions including Huntington Beach, Westminster, St,inton, Garden Grove, Buena
Park, Fullerton, Anaheim, La Mirada, La Habra and the Cou;lty of Orange.
The Firm is responsible for the preparation of conceptual engineering plans, environ-
mental documentation., economic analysis, and a financing plan for ultimate imple-
mentation of the high-flow arterial concept including "flyover" bridge construction 'rat
several intersections along Beach Boulevard. The principal elements of the work
program are to:
0 Prepare conceptual design plans for high-flow arterial improvements on
Beach Boulevard between Pacific Coast Highway'and Imperial Highway
based on existing and future travel demand;
a Develop cost estimates, project phasing, and financing options for the
recommended improvements;
® Prepare appropriate documentation addressing the environmental impacts
of the recommended improvements;
0 Anal�Nze the economic impacts of the recommended improvements to
Beach Boulevard;
a Evaluate the findings and recommendations of this study for applicability
to futui e super street projects; and
® Develop and document an effective and complete community information
dissemination and consensus building process.
The Super Streets concept involves the coordinated application of various traffic float '
improvements to a major arterial street. Components of the concept include traffic
signal coordination, bus turnouts, parking restrictions/removals, access limitations,
intersection/roadway widening and arterial interchanges. Benefits of the Super Street
concept are improved travel times and fuel economy with subsequent reductions in the
number of stops and vehicle emissions and economic benefits to property/business
owners. The Super Street concept is cost effective because these improvements can
typically be made within the existing highway right-of-way. This demonstration
g g
project could eventually be applicable to highways in California and nationwide.
Beach Boulevard was selected for this demonstration based on existing traffic demand,
the need to improve north/south mobility in Orange County, and the support of local
agencies along Beach Boulevard.
II
II .
7 i
HUNTINGTON BEACH TRANSPORTATION DEMAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA
Under contract to the City of Huntington Beach, Parsons Brinckerhoff developed a
traffic model to predict travel patterns and arterial street volumes, as a function of
the City's land use and circulation system. The modeling approach deliberately
employed direct and consistent interface with the Orange County Multimodal Trans-
portation model. The Huntington Beach model was designed for several practical
applications, such as testing the compatibility of the City's land use and circulations
plans, the impacts of adding new major facilities to the City's circulation system, and
the impacts on the City's arterials from major changes in the circulation systems or
land development in surrounding cities. Parsons Brinckerhoff's technical activities on
the project, included a detailed zonal system for the City, fully compatible with the
Multimodal Study's zone system; definition of a detailed base year highway network;
assembly of highway network data for coding; guidance io the City in the conduct of
trip generation studies as input to the model; basic model structuring and interfacing
with the countywide model; and detailed model assembly and testing. The model has
been used frequently since it was developed to forecast traffic loads for various land
use scenarios and circulation system variations.
HUNTINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN PARKING, TRANSIT, AND FINANCING
STUDY -HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Parsons Brinckerhoff was under contract to the City of Huntington Beach to develop
recommendations to implement the parking and transit elements of the City's
Downtown Specific Plan. The Firm's role was to establish the size and location of
parking structures required to adequately service future land uses, to examine the
need for downtown shuttle transit, and/or pedestrian grade separations, and to analyze
alternate means of financing the necessary improvements. In carrying out the scope
of work, Parsons Brinckerhoff established parking supply/demand relationships,
identifying candidate sites for parking facilities, and recommending sites based on an
overall staging plan. Bicycle and pedestrian movements was examined. Shuttle transit
demand and financing options was also evaluated as part of an overall system of
downtown access from the parking structures.
HUNTING'TON CENTER COMMERCIAL DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT EIR -
HUNTINGTON BI?ACH, CALIFORNIA
Parsons Rrinckerhoff was retained as part of a consultant team to prepare an
environu,ental impact report for the proposed 'Huntington Center Commercial District
Redevelopment project The project, sponsored by the City of Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Agency, added 535,000 sq. ft. of retail, 207,000 sq. ft. of office, and a
224 room hotel, and a parking structure to the project area, which is located in the
vicinity of the San Diego Freeway (I-405) and Beach Boulevard in the City of
Huntington Beach. In addition to the new development, the existing commercial
structures were to be rehabilitated, utilities placed underground, on-site landscaping
improved, and improvements made to the circulation and traffic system. Parsons
Brinckerhoff's role in the EIR was to analyze the potential traffic impacts of the
redevelopment project, and recommend mitigation measures for the area.
Baseline data for the project area were collected, including roadway and intersection
lane configurations, traffic volume data, and existing intersection level of service.
The impact of the project added traffic was estimated by calculating trip generation
for the additional uses, and assigning the additional traffic to the arterial streets and
freeway ramps in the project vicinity, using trip distribution factors obtained from a
recent study within the project area. Intersection level of service analyses were
conducted for key street intersections adjacent to the project area with project traffic
added to existing traffic volumes.
Potential mitigation measures were identified for each of the significant negative
project traffic impacts. The potential mitigation measures included intersection spot-
widening, traffic signalization improvements, street access modifications, a potential
arterial street extension, and freeway ramp improvement. Additionally, improvements
to the bicycle trail system were recommended.
BOLBA CHICA AREA TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION PLAN-HUNTINGTON BEACH,
CALIFORNIA
Parsons Brinckerhoff was retained by Signal Landmark Properties, Inc., the land
development unit of the Signal Companies, as project traffic engineer to assist in
planning the ultimate development of 1200 acres of prime coastal property i Orange
County.
Working closely with land use planners, our staff served 'as transportation and
circulation planners in the design of arterial street circulation systems to complement
alternative project development concepts. Land uses ranged from residential to
office/commercial, resort hotels, marina/tourist commercial complexes, beaches and
community retail centers.
Parsons Brinckerhoff tested future traffic loadings and provided design advice on more
than twenty different land use scenarios at varying levels of refinement. Our staff
utilized the Huntington Beach Transportation Demand Model, which it had previously
developed, to systematically estimate the trip generation, trip distribution and traffic
assignment for each alternative scenario.
The model's application has provided insight into traffic impacts of the development
on the surrounding street system and the sizing of arterial roadways internal to the
project area. The model runs provide continuing available documentation supporting
the basis for the traffic forecasts and ensure credibility with concerned public sector
officials.
Parsons Brinckerhoff had complete responsibility for all aspects of the transportation
analysis for the General Plan Amendment relating to the project and was tailed upon
to provide detailed analyses of major proposals including:
a Rerouting of Pacific Coast Highway inland around the Bolsa Chica area.
® Widening of Pacific Coast Highway through sensitive coastal-areas.
• Determination of "development thresholds" above which development
intensities would produce unacceptable traffic impacts.
® Addition of a second parallel route to Pacific Coast Highway to offset
coastal traffic impacts. 7.
The Firm has coordinated directly with all local public agencies involved and has
responded to comments from a number of State agencies including California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the California Coastal Commission.
9
PARSONS BRINCKERROxF
DARIUS S. IRANI
Manager, Transportation and Environmental Services
EDUCATION: . M.B.A., Finance, Loyola University of
Chicago, 1974
M.S., Transportation Engineering, Iowa
State University, 1969
B.S., Civil Engineering, Karachi
University, Pakistan, 1966
PROFESSIONAL American Road and Transportation Builders Association,
AFFILIATIONS: Transportation Planning Committee
American Society of Civil Engineers
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Mr. Irani is responsible for the conduct of transportation system planning and design,
transportation improvement programs and policy development, and management
studies. He is involved in numerous transportation projects in the Southern California
region including:
* Super Streets Demonstration Project-Beach Boulevard Corridor, Orar,,,e
County, California - Project manager for the 19.5 mile corridor �+udy
providing conceptual engineering plans, environmental documentation,
economic impacts, and a financing plan for ultimate implementation of the
high-flow arterial concept, including "flyover" bridge construction at up to
seven intersections.
Route 30 Corridor Study, San Bernardino, California - As project engineer
for this 28-mile corridor study, Mr. Irani provided conceptual design for
highway alternatives, anG liaison for project design with the Caltrans
deputy district director in charge of the project and local public r:orks
directors and elected officials.
Long Beach-Los Angeles Light Rail Project, Los Angeles, California - As
manager of transp»rtation and environmental studies in relation to the
development of rare and bus alternatives, Mr. Irani has been responsible for
the development of alternative alignments, review of patronage
forecasting, anaiysis of transportation impacts during operations and
construction, coordination with affected agencies, and participation in the
preparation of the environmental impact report.
® North University City Transit Study, San Diego, California - Project
manager for the public transit study focusing on the feasibility, financing,
and implementation of an intracommunity transit shuttle serving the North
University City area.
1
j
11 MONISM
DARIUS S. IRANI
a San Clemente Comprehensive Plan, California - Project Manager
responsible for the traffic circulation and transit element of the San
Clemente Downtown Year 2000 Development Plan.
In addition to his work in Southern California, Mr. Irani is participating in the
development and analysis of highway and transit alternatives for the 115/State Street
Corridor Study in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Prior to this work with Parsons Brinckerhoff, Mr. Irani served as Vice President and
Director of the transportation division with a major rnidwest consulting firm. At this
firm, Mr. Irani's responsibilities included: management and supervision of transporta-
tion systems operations, planning and design work, and corridor studies. His prior
professional experience included the following selected assignments:
* Edens Expressway (FAI-94), Cook County, Illinois - Project Manager for
design study and preparation of environmental impact and 4(f) statements
for eight interchange modifications.
e Four Mile Sauk Trail (FA Rte. 1532), Cook County, Illinois - Project
Manager responsible for the provision of complete professional engineering
services for a combined location and design study and environmental
impact and 4(f) statements.
* Chicago Crosstown Expressway (FAI 494), Chicago, Illinois - Participated
in comprehensive planning of the 22-mile urban corridor which included
transportation planning and design, traffic engineering, location and design,
economic feasibility, and environmental impact studies.
® Ten Mile East-West Crosstown Expressway and Fifteen Mile Anthony Boul-
evard Corridor, Fort Wayne, Indiana - Participated in preparation of
highway feasibility, traffic engineering, and corridor studies.
® North-South Freeway, between Baton Rouge and Shreveport, Louisiana -
Assisted in the corridor study and EIS for 300 mile highway.
0 FAP-,432/420 and FAP-420, Lake and McHenry Counties, Illinois -Develop-
ment of environmental impact statements for these corridor studies
covering 40 miles.
b San Diego Light Rail Project, Metropolitan Transit Development Board,
San Diego, California - Project Manager for providing operations and
administrative assistance including preparation of operating and engi-
neering/maintenance-of-way rule books, standard operating procedures,
maintenance manuals, and development of procedures for accounting,
contracts, and training of personnel.
DARIUS S. IRANI
® Phase II Study of the St. Louis Railroad Gateway Terminal Restructuring
Project, St. Louis, Missouri - Participated in the direction of the study
involving major yard consolidation and expansion studies. The goals of the
Study were to improve the efficiency of railroad operations, reduce
rail/community conflicts, and improve opportunities for economic and
community development.
* Chicago Central Area Transit.Project, Chicago, Illinois - Directed trans-
portation planning/managem ant and economic feasibility studies. Prepared
system comparative analysis documents for presentation to the Office of
Budget and Managermert. As a member of the Chicago Urban Transpor-
tation District Task Force, was involved in the development and selection
of alternative routes for the Franklin and Monroe subway lines.
Professional "Edens Expressway-FAI-94, Interchange Modifications",
Paper: presented at the ASCE technical session.
Faculty
Appointment: Lecturer, Traffic Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology.
PARSONS BRINCKERROFF
JAMES G. DOUGLAS
Senior Tranportation Planner
EDUCATION: M.A., Urban and Regional Planning;School of
Architecture and Urban Planning, University
of California at Los Angeles
B.A., Geography and Political Science,
University of California at Los Angeles
PROFESSIONAL Institute of Transportation Engineers
AFFILIATION:
Mr. Douglas specializes in urban and regional transportation planning and local circula-
tion system analysis. He has managed and participated significantly in transportation
planning, traffic engineering, parking, traffic management, and traffic design projects,
combining aspects of alternatives analysis and long-range planning with practical
traffic operation and engineering considerations.
His recent project management experience includes:
The North Beach Planning/Tiaffic Study for the City of Carlsbad,
California. This study includes analysis of future circulation needs in the
northwest portion of the City, plus detailed land use parking analysis within
a special treatment area near the coast.
The Central and Leeward Oahu Transportation Study, a regional
transportation study on the Island of Oahu, Hawaii. The project included
creation of a regional traffic forecasting • model, and analyzed the
transportation impacts of various regional growth strategies, TSM
programs, and transit improvements.
® Circulation and infrastructure planning for the Grossmont Specific Plan in
La Mesa, including traffic and transit analysis, intersection operation and
signal coordination, computer traffic model forecasting, bicycle and
pedestrian circulation, and analysis of flood control, water, and sewer
facilities.
The Big Bear bake Transportation Study, a comprehensive transportation
plan for a major mountain resort in Southern California. The study was a
multi-modal circulation analysis, and recommended short- and long-range
improvement strategies for traffic, parking, transit, bicycle and pedezitrian
facilities.
Circulation and infrastructure planning for the Upper Peters Canyon
Specific Plan for the City of Orange, California. 3
i
The Fletcher Pm:z:t ay Traffic Analysis, a study for the City of L€ Mesa
which analyzed Year 2005 traffic demands using a microcomputer traffic a
F ,
DAMES G. DOUGLAS
model and recommended intersection lane geometry, storage lengths,
signal locations and coordination, and bicycle treatment,
® Traffic impact analysis for the University City Village retirement
community in San Diego, including research into the traffic generation
characteristics of senior citizen residential communities.
a Circulation analysis for the Stadium Area Study in Anaheim, California.
This traffic study used a microcomputer traffic model to project the
traffic demands generated by alternative development scenarios, and
recommended improvements needed to accommodate each development
scenario.
® Circulation and infrastructure elements of redevelopment E1Rs in the
cities of Huntington Beach, Carson, and Fontana.
His recent experience also includes several project assignments as the lead
transportation planner:
® Parking and shuttle service analysis for the Huntington Beach Downtown
Parking, Transit, and Financing Study.
Ontario Center Transportation Planning and Arterial Street Design.
Responsibilities have included traffic modelling, transit planning, parking
management, capacity analysis, and preliminary street design.
® Transit system modelling and patronage projections for the North
University City Transit Study in San Diego.
o Analysis of existing and future capacity- deficiencies, analysis of
alternatives, and selection of final recommendations for the Arterials
Element of Orange County's Santa Ana Transportation Corridor Study.
® UCSD Traffic, Access, and Parking Study. Responsibilities included traffic
modelling and circulation system alternatives analysis.
® Analysis of existing and projected traffic conditions, analysis of
alternatives, and recommendation of improvements for the Beach
f Boulevard Super Streets Demonstration Project in Orange County.
Prior to joining Parsons Brinckerhoff, Mr. Douglas served as Assistant Administrative
Analyst for the UCLA Transportation Services Administration. In that capacity, he
conducted the UCLA Circulation System Study, which included the following responsi-
bilities:
® Conducting a campus-wide origin-destination survey.
0 Analysis of campus travel patterns.
0 Analysis of circulation system alternatives.
Selection of preferred alternative.
DHI ASSOCIATES
DALE H. IWAI
Traffic Modeling
EDUCATION: B.S., Computer Science, west Cost University
A.A., Engineering, East Los Angeles Junior
College
Mr. Iwai is a transportation planner who has brought specialized experience in
computer systems applications to a wide variety of projects. His background includes
several current and previous engagements inolving transportation demand model
devlopment and application within Orange County. His skills range from the
application of judgment and experience in transportation modeling decisions, to the
actual setup, operation, and documentation of computerized transportation models.
Mr. Iwai is well-versed in the UTPS (Urban Transportation Planning System) battery of
programs, as well as others such as the Federal Highway Administration's PLANPAC.
He has, in the course of his work, often demonstrated the uge of the programs and
related network coding procedures to other individuals.
For the Orange County Multimodal Transportation Study, Mr. Iwai assumed lead
responsibility for developing and coding the study's base year countywide
freeway/arterial highway network, and for integrating that network with the
regionwide LARTS network. He also was responsible for developing the coded base
year transit network, integrated with the highway network. He has helped to
familiarze County staff with UTPS procedures. In addition to network development,
his involvement with the Multimodal study has included model validation activities,
organization and display of input data, and a decision making role in setting model
parameters. He has also been responsible for defining and detailing selected future
highway system alternatives in collaboration with Orange County Tansportation
Commission and County of Orange staff.
Mr. Iwai was a principal participant in the Huntington Beach Transportation Demand
Model, a subarea model utilizing the Orange County multimodai model with detailed
"windowing in" to a finer level of zone and network detail within the City of
Huntington Beach. Mr. Iwai is intimately involved in the actual details of model
structure and trip table ipterface for this modeling project. His role includes direct
involvement in, and application of techniques for, local area trip generation,
distribution, mode split, and assignment.
For' Parsons Brinckerhoff (PBQ&D), Mr. Iwai has also recently been responsible for
development of computerized recreation resource inventory systems and analysis of
recreational survey data in Orange County, as well as the development of
computerized recreation participation forecasts using the MAVEN recreation model
recently developed under contract to the County. Previously, he was responsible for
management and analysis of survey and interview data for PBQ&D recreation and
visitor use studies, including the Greater Yellowstone Regional Recreation Use Project r
and the Utah National Parks Visitor Use Study. Mr. Iwai has also served as Deputy
LW ma Jill RIMNIMIE
r.
i
DALE IL I6WAI
Project Manager for the Recreation Travel Impacts Project for the U.S. Department
P 7 P
of Transportation, responsible for developing data on statewide recreation travel
planning Tannin activities.
While with Alan M. Voorhees & Associates, Mr. haai was responsible for computer
programming and computer applications of transportation planning program packages
and special traffic operations analysis programs. He was responsible for data
collection and analysis on several major transit planning studes, inluding the Bay Area
Rapid Transit/AC Transit Coordination Study and the Southern California Rapid
Transit District Low Capitai Alternatives Study. Mr. Iwai has directed network coding
and patronage analyses in early transit studies in Orange County, California, and Sao
Paulo, Brazil. He was a major contributor to the development of a modal split model
in the Fresno Transportation Study, and hs was responsible for- the development of
highway networks and demand modeling procedures for the Southeast Orange County
Circulation Study (SEOCCS).
Mr. Iwai has performed computer analyses and graphic preparations on a variety of
planning and operations studies, including a feasibility study of reserved lanes for
buses and carpools, a Los Angeles Central Business District planning study, and several
area-wide TOPICS planning studies. He was also a major contributor to programming
of the volume predictor model for second-generation software under Federal Highway
Administration's Urban Traffic Control System Program.
4.. Y .- :' �
f�ro'5�r
Y "A ^K Y 3f ': %^ 4t'{' ek+� .X' Y�T �t Y' •I
C,�r ,.WF±n- � rf`'.�-L:.�[:✓ ,A ✓' �' t�" +ap�.+k.:. 'y� � Y ,� �t,., ��� '�i'•<"X�4' cs�I � ', .r-r R^H
Npffi`y 4
pA�7®�•
i5S`•�15
r b. ' k r 'arzza�rtia» yf ' r'r.'" 5is 1.
�.w�,,,., �' .+�"�`�x...,.eu.t"T�.urtru,.w�..rsv `_. E...,.:ws"td....�`—,k L,� "i �n.�.u'al:.•�,� __.__._.--__—.._
ari0pi.)CER •
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS y
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc.
1185 avenue of the Americas ICOMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
New York, N.Y. 10036
t MNY
f�ETFR Continental Casualty Company
COMPANY Transportation Insurance Compar.7
$ INsuREI) LCTTFR B
Parsons Brinckerhoff 9uade & Douglas, �n :UMPANv
I` One Penn Plaza LETTER
New York, N.Y. 1.0119 G�MPANY
i LFTTER
COMPANY E
LETTER '�^
.ss i `'Y"�C"T'itr"' "'�,1 :.r'.': "a''" t a 4'..�� yam" +[-•m-'i r-r sr ✓ �qS"4.� ".^'�f Y [
. 4&r'`�-3v�r w��.s'�e,.v�.?c`:il..: �el'�:o...,�s..i^.,:fir+—`.e.•.,..G:.uks_r:�.�.�`..t�1:�,..�..s w.^..�u:�:t,n.3�.•a...:.:�r. r "�.-�i�.:C.i:;:,�„w�;..Ar:?wva.:� c - `,`^
r.
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY
�??B BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDI-
TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
R iT T T
GO TYPE OF INSURANCE PC_L+Gv NUMEDEH ` ✓i '': x tic I LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOiJSANDS
LTRI. GENEAAI.LIABILITY '.'.\.�_- _ t .fyREvE_ AGGREGATE a
6OpiL'v
X� OMPf4HFNS1VE FORM I nu`[R.
f x i F 1004S OPERAPONS nRGPERT r i
7 Ur IE4GRGUND
x Elul OS'ON u O7LLAPSE yA 1ARD
A v f CCPOO1703103* ll/l/85 ll/l/86 !
RODLCTSFCUMPLETE9 Ot eAATIONS
)NIRAI T,AI 1 d a Pr,
Ii.Qf BaLJ $ 1,000 �$ 1,000
�i �D P�NDEvT cuNTRA^ nR•� ,--- ---____ ___
9R)A,FORM PROPERTY DAMA6E I
t-"J
vFh,ONA. INJURY PERSONAL INJURY $ 1,000
I AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
4 A I x A i,AUTO j BUA 001702107* ll/l/85 i
ll/l/86 a" " $_.__—
L! OWIiFID AUTOS(PP.IJ PASS) l ! 1
�-
�� I,AIL OWNED AUTOS`OTHER THAN)/ I $_._-_—_
PRIV FAS5
[,AIRED AUTOS Ii
f- PPROVED AS T� 1+URIL, PacIPERry -
NON OWNED AUTOS AMAGE $
GARAGE LIABILITY I
I y � icoMPLI
Bl F 1,000
i EXCESS LIABILITY Y�tam�,,,
yym B�RFD
f UMBRELLA FORM I ' "" COMBINED $ $
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM f
STATUTORY
WORKERS'COMPENSATION j $1 000(fACH ACCIDENT)
B AND WC 001703099 ll/l/85 ll/l/86 $1 0O00SEASE POLICY LIMIT)
EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY $ 00)DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE)
OTHER '
Professional i 1,000 per claim
A Liability AAE 823 27 70 t ll/l/85 ll/l/86 1,000 Aqgregate
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSNEHICLESISPECIAL ITEMS RE: Alignment - Classification study of Edwards St.
g
JOB NUMBER: 2148
*Certificate Holder i$ included s n ad itio al i sured with reference to
this project
.0 --i �i,� •Cr P ik,, �._,„,j ���1{ ,�,Jxp{.-�` JC. �[• � I 1r�F £_ f iil :'@, i..
City of Huntington Beach
Mr.. Paul Cook SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX.
r PIRAT196 DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL tMOZAVOR-TC'
Director of Public Works MAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAnF=6-TQ-T4JS
City of Huntington Beach �`)` r>zxrl usT�rnA7"t_rr�°rtcL^�rraizr�P=zcT1_°� �rc •' ' '>tas
�'fF�iF���b'�P(T.H.ftl:S.i2MFILl.NdY..tL�Ct_IYLS_Gft__RE-F�R_E�'1'��rYJ£'3,
2000 Main Street, Huntington, Ca 92648 AUTHPAIZp R SE 'E -�
B ! �S' :(� 'v �[Y;' M1. ..`.'T[.:•t�•Y1?36 "`Tt �'e,�.,}y;�
,,. 3"`'-� 4 [� I 3 e# on �� 1 �'�•:
`�•< a � .. �$ F7�+ .�ik;,f P ,i�T r Y.�` 7 �'IrYF 1� u t ,r� �h ^' �'" '
i `�� �•f � ���+ i.t:. #i.�='f ��il m tY � �'L , s�t�al-ay�4 rc' �,{$} .S�.'� � �-�,`i�5;'��[,Ji�4 U t 7 ;.�e$t`{,-