The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES - 2000-05-01 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK JOAN L. FLYNN CITY CLERK. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL OF ITEM APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL/ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE: ' D(lL-`-M6 1q, c)-oo LZ TO: ATTENTION: 6�z-zC- V N a7 `` U"��J ,�c��''� DEPARTMENT: Street Z4 i///J" Z2 GARDING: City, rate,zip ' See Attached Action Agenda Item .0 -/ Date of Approval Enclosed For Your Records Is An Executed Copy Of The Above Referenced Agenda Item. Remarks: City Clerk Attachments: Action.Agenda-Page' Agreemen. V. : Bonds Insurance.' RCA Deed . Other CC: / ✓ _� Na6w Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other f Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other e artment RCA Agreement Insurance. Other /2�atba—?,4 �✓ Name Department RCA Insurance (Telephone:714-536-5227) (22) November 15, 2004- Council/Agency Agenda- Page 22 E-14. (City Council) Approve Amendment No. 2 Extending Agreement between the City and RBF Consulting (Formerly Robert Bein, William Frost &Associates) for Consulting Services for Water Well No. 12 Pump and Facilities Installation; CCA 119 ( )— 1. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between the City of.Huntington`Beach:and RBF.Consulting (Formerly Robert Bein;. William Frost.&Associates)for consulting services for.Water.Well No. 12 pump and facilities installation (CC 1119) and 2. Authorize an exemption to Section 3.03.120 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code to allow extension of a professional services contract beyond the term of three years. Submitted by the Public Works Director. Funding Source: Funds in the amount of $82,476.00 are available from the Water Master Plan Fund, Well Improvements, Water Improvements, account number 50791011.82100. . Approved 7—0 E-15 (City Council) Approve Affordable Housing Agreement between the City and Mainstreet Townhomes, LLC for a 20-Unit Attached Townhome Project Located at the SM Corner of Main and Holly Streets (Holly Seacliff Specific Plan Area) ( . ) —Approve the Agreement Containing Coventants Affecting Real Property By and Between the City of Huntington Beach and Mainstreet Townhomes LLC, titled Declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions for Property(Resale Restrictions), and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and execute (Attachment No. 1). Submitted by the Planning Director. Funding Source: Not Applicable. Approved 7- 0 �► 1 Council/Agency Meeting Held: Deferred/Continued to: Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied er Sign t re Council Meeting Date: 11/15/2004 Departm Number: 04-092 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI MEMBERS SUBMITTED BY: ETH-GRAFT, CITY ADMINISTRATOR r PREPARED BY: ROBERT F. BEARDSLEY, PE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WOJS SUBJECT: Approve Amendment No. 2 to Agreement with RBF Consulting for Water Well No. 12 Pump and Facilities Installation (CC-1119) Statement of Issue,Funding Source, Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: It is necessary to amend the Water Well No. 12 engineering services agreement with RBF Consulting to include construction support services through completion of the project. Funding Source: Funds in the amount of $82,476 are available from the Water Master Plan Fund, Well Improvements, Water Improvements, account number 50791011.82100. Recommended Action: Motion to: 1. Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement between the City of Huntington Beach and RBF Consulting (Formerly Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates) for consulting services for Water Well No. 12 pump and facilities installation (CC 1119); and 2. Authorize an exemption to Section 3.03.120 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code to allow extension of a professional services contract beyond the term of three years. Alternative Action(s): Do not authorize the amendment and/or exemption and direct staff on how to proceed. o 2 o C L ©; 7 r- r O r,., 0 `- � n REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: 11/15/2004 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: 04-092 Analysis_: On May 1, 2000, the City Council approved a professional services contract with Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF Consulting) for engineering consulting services for Water Well No. 12 Pump and Facilities Installation in the amount of $223,307. On March 4, 2002, the City executed Amendment No.1 for an additional $24,128 for additional design services as a result of changes in the project layout and boundaries resulting from the revised Boeing Specific Plan. A construction contract was awarded to Caliagua, Inc. in May 2004. Due to the time delays, complexity and extent of the project, it is now necessary to execute a second contract amendment to continue the construction support services of RBF Consulting. Section 3.03.120 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code does not allow the extension of a professional services contract beyond the term of three years. Staff requests an exemption to this requirement since RBF, as the engineer of record, is uniquely qualified to provide these services. Construction support services typically include responses to requests for information, review of shop drawings for conformance to the specifications, and site visits to verify that the project construction is in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. Execution of Contract Amendment No. 2 will allow RBF to continue providing services to support this project for a period of two years from the date of execution of this amendment, if necessary. Construction completion is anticipated by July 2005. Public Works Commission Action: Not required. Environmental Status: Not applicable to the contract amendment. Attachment(s): NumberCity Clerk's Page . Description 1. Amendment No. 2 to Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and RBF Consulting for Consulting Services for Water Well No. 12 Pump and Facilities Installation. GAR C A\2004\04-092 Nov 15 RBF Consulting Contract Amendment.doc -2- 10/28/2004 2:30 PM ATTACHMENT # 1 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND RBF CONSULTING (FORMERLY, ROBERT BEIN,WILLIAM FROST&ASSOCIATES) FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12 PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION (CC 1119) THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 is made and entered into the / ay of JUo✓p4nhgje 2004, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and RBF CONSULTING (formerly known as ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST& ASSOCIATES), a California corporation,hereinafter referred to as"CONSULTANT." WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT are parties to that certain agreement, dated May 1, 2000, entitled "Professional Services Contract Between the City of Huntington Beach and Robert Bein, William Frost& Associates for Consulting Services which agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as the"Original Agreement," and In March 2002, CITY and CONSULTANT executed Amendment No. 1 to the Original Agreement; and CITY and CONSULTANT now wish to amend the Original Agreement with this Amendment No. 2 to reflect additional work to be performed by CONSULTANT and the additional compensation to be paid in consideration thereof by CITY. f; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: 1. ADDITIONAL WORK CONSULTANT shall'provide to CITY such additional services described in CONSULTANT's letter to CITY dated October 11, 2004, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit"A," and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 2. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION In consideration of the additional services to be performed hereunder as described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT as full payment for services rendered, an additional sum not to exceed Eighty-Two Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-Six Dollars ($82,476.00), bringing the total amount of the compensation to S334,911.00. 3. REAFFIRMATION Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 04agreeaFB amend 2/10/21/04 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized offices the day, month and year first above written. RBF CONSULTING, INC., CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California By: print name ITS: (circle one)Chairman/Presiden ce Presi en Maytr AND By: A'X4City Cler APP OVED AS TO FORM: print na=Finanial ITS: (circle one)Secreta Asst. Secretary-Treasurer dY1gY(J it Attorney -z0`\Y— 9�2z/ ITIA D AND A OVED: REVIEWED AND APPROVED: erector of Public Works City v Administrator 04agree/RFB amend 2/9/17/04 2 EXHIBIT A NOV-01-04 03:19PM FROM—WATER RESOURCES + T-536 P..02/08 F-171 me o CONSULTING October 11, 2004 JN 10-100606 Ms. Debbie DeBow PUBLIC WORKS D1-PARTMENT CITY OB HUNTINGTON UPEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject; Water Well No. 12 Pump & Facilities Installation - Revised Contract Addendum No.2 Dear Ms. DeBow_ As you know,RBF Consulting has been contracted by the Cityto prepare final plans,specifications, and estimates for the design of the Water Well No. 12 Pump and Facilities Installation. During the course of the work,requests for additional items and and requests for modifications to the design have resulted in RBF Consulting providing additional services beyond the original scope of work and fee estimate. The additional work provided by RBF includes revisions per the October 11,2002 letters from RBF and the October 15, 2002 letter from Tom Rulla, modifications and changes to the plans and specifications for the 18 months prior to the project bidding to comply with and/or satisfy plan checking comments, and additional construction services. These services also included additional coordination with the electrical utility,utility research,field reconnaissance,custom gate card reader design,and design of additional off-site electrical conduits. Tom Rulla authorised the invoicing of construction phase services to cover this work and indicated that a contract atnettdment to RBF would coincide with the award of the construction contract. The fee required for this work is $82,476. See the attached Addendum No. 2 for a breakdown of the fee. RBF also proposes to extend the duration of the contract to extend through the end of construction which is estimated to be 1 calendar year from the date indicated above. Work was also completed during the construction phase to redesign the perimeter wall and make revisions to the wall and fence along the access road. Please provide authorization to amend the contract by the amount indicated by signing below and returning a copy of this letter. We at RBF Consulting appreciate this opportunity to continue providing engineering services to the City of Huntington Beach. PLANNING 13 PESIGN 2 CQN5TRUFT10N 14726 Alton Parkwey.Irvrno.CA 92618-2027 a PO Box 57057.Irvrrle.CA 92619-7057 ■ 94P 472 3505 ■ Fax 949 472 B3i3 offrcas lomoo mrougnout Cahtorma.Arizona&Nnvacla 11 www.RBF.com pum5a on rvwi-g p4w NOV-01-04 03:19PM FROM-WATER RESOURCES + T-536 P.03/08 F-171 Ms.Debbie Ael3ow October U,2004 Page 2 if you have any questions,please call me at(949) 855-3646. Sincerel , Approved By: Steven R. Speakman,P.E. Project Manager City of Huntington Beach li:\pdata\101006061Admin\conuwt\Ad4endum2_3\Combined 2 and 3utr addendum2_3 fmal.WP4 PC: Accounting,file NOV-01-04 03:20PM FROM-WATER RESOURCES + T-536 P.04/06 F-171 CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH WATER WELL NO. 12 PUMP& FACILITIES INSTALLATION ADDENDUM NO.2 October 11,2004 ITEM#1 -DESIGN REVISIONS DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL WORK. This item includes revisions to the plans and specifications for revising Architectural drawings, additional electrical design, revisions to noise study, and revisions to public notifications. See letter dated October 11,2002 from RBF and letter dated October 15,2002 from the City of Huntington Beach from Tom Rulla. ESTIMATED BUDGET IMPACTS: $14,225 ITEM 02-REVISE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL WORK This item includes revisions to the plans and specifications do to changes, revisions from the original design as a result of plan check comments and includes meetings and coordination over the last IS months prior to project going to bid. ESTIMATED BUDGET IMPACTS: $10,365. ITEM#3-CiJSTOM GATE DESIGN DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL WORK Providing additional landscape architectural and electrical services to accommodate addition of and revision to card reader service at the entrance gate. ESTIMATED BUDGET IMPACTS: $2,975 ITEM#4-ELECTRICAL DESIGN DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL WORK Providing electrical design services for the extension of the utility paint of connection in Rancho Road. ESTIMATED BUDGET IMPACTS; $4,420 NOV-01-04 03:20PM FROM-WATER RESOURCES + T-536 P.05/08 F-171 ITEM#5-UTILITY RESEARCH DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL WORK Providing utility research and site visit for USA marking for extended electrical conduit design. ESTIMATED BUDGET IMPACTS: $2,640 ITEM#6-CONSTRUCTION MEF.TINGS DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL.WORK Providing additional 18 construction meetings and 11 field reviews. ESTIMATED BUDGET IMPACTS: $16,940 ITEM#7-SHOP DRAWINCS AND RFI'S DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL.WORK Providing up to an additional 30 shop drawing reviews and 5 responses to R. P& This is required due to the nature of the project and contractor. ESTIMATED BUDGET IMPACTS: $18,911 ITEM#8-MISCELLANEOUS S1E'RVICRS DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL WORK Providing additional services as requested by the City on a time and materials basis. ($3,650 of this allotment has been expended on redesign of the perimeter wall and fence along the access road.) NOT TO EXCEED1l): $10,000 [I I Without prior authorization. The estimated budget for all labor and materials described in this Additional Work Request is $80,476 and with a$2,000 dollar allotment for rei rtbursables,copies,milage and other expenses the total is $82,476, NOV-01-04 03:20PM FROM-WATER RESOURCES + T-636 P.06/08 F-171 REVISED ESTIMATED.HOURS AND FEE WATER WELL NO. 12,PUMP AN13 FACILITIES INSTALLATION(GASH CONTRACT NO.1119) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A roximate Person-Hours Total PrIncIPal Project Project Peslgnarl EStlm4164 Task Descri Won In Charnel Mana er Engineer Drafter Fee PHASE III: BID EVALUATION AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT 3.1 84 Evaluation 0 1 6 0 $709 2 Construction Setwces 3.2.1 Sut)mi=i Review 6o) eI 0 80 200 32 $31.712 3 2 2 RRs ono to RFIs(301141 0 30 ISO 0 $14,330 3 2 3 Evaluate Change Ortters(8) 4 10 50 0 $6,750 3.2.4 Field Reviews(13) 0 26 26 0 $5.6" 3.2.5 Construction Meetings(26) 0 55 114 0 $17.794 3 2 6 Fiala Tv%29.Start-up.Final Construction Review,8 Punch List 0 8 52 0 $7.044 3 2 7 Record DravAn9 Preparation a 4 12 62 $6.372 3.2.8 Miscenansous Services(T&M) 3 $10,000 SUBTOTAL PHASE 111: 4 202 W 32 $104,405 OTHER COSTS: Dirm CoswRe rogra hiasrCa wWMila i)eGeverles Ill $2.000 TOTAL PHASE 111: 4 202 546 32 $104.405 ORIGINAL PHASE III COSTS: $58,554 OST FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: $47,851 t7ST FOR DESIGN SERVICE PER OCTOBF.R 15,200]t.teTTER 5 $14,225 COST FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES: $20.400 TOTAL ADDENDUM NO,2: 82 476 [1)-See also the original contract [21-18 Agq,twnal meetings added I31-This tritim tasK was adgeO. 141-30 shop drivAnge and 5 RFI's were adaed. 151-See letters dated October 11,2002 from RRF ana Octapar 15 from Tom Row n:Xpdata110100606wdmin%=Wactladclendum2_3womt„nea 2 and Wee Oo 2_3 ftrlalxls 10/26/2004 MOV-01-04 03:20PM FROM-WATER RESOURCES + T-536 P.07/08 F-171 F EF 4 a a RMNIaU!.TINra October 11, 2004 TN 10-100606 Ms. Debbie DeBow Pusuc WORKS DrFARTMENT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Subject: Water WeU No. 12 Pump & Facilities Installation - Revised Scope of Work for Construction Services pear Ms. DeBow: At your request the following scope of work for construction services has been prepared to clarify the original proposal dated February 15,2000. RBF will provide the Construction Administration services requested in the RFP as described below. Task 3.1 Task Completed. Task 3.2 Construction Support. The following services will be provided during the construction phase of the work. Task 3.21. Submittal Review. Up to 60 submittals will be reviewed. This task includes review of up to 1 resubtriitual of necessary for these shop drawings. Effort required beyond the amount indicated on in the fee table will be on a time and material basis. Task 3.2.2 Requests for Information. RBF vnll provide clanficaiion for up to 30 RFI's. Effort required beyond this will be on a time and material basis. Task 3.2.3 Change Orders. RBF will provide evaluation and recotnrruendations for up to eight change orders. l;ffort required beyond this will be on a time and material basis. Task 3.2.4 Field Reviews. RBF will visit the site once per month during construction to review the progress of the work before or after the construction meetings. P{.ANNINCa I oEBIQN M r-nN5TRWr.TIQN 14725 Acton Norway,Irvine,CA 92618-2027 ■ Po.Box 67057,Irvine,CA 92619-7057 ■ 949.472.3506 a Fax 942 472 8373 oTficas wmeq vrouohoui Caidamta.Ar,zona&Nevaae 6 www RBFcom P'..W.u"aCVCW WPa. NOV-01-04 03:21PM FROM-WATER RESOURCES + T-536 P.08/08 F-171 Ms.Debbie DeBow October 11,2004 Pale 2 Task 3.2.5 Construction Meetings. RAF will conduct or attend two meeting each month during a 13 month construction period. in addition RBf will attend one pre construction meeting. Task 3.2.6 Field Testing, Start-up, Final Site Review,and Punch List- REF will provide up to 8 hours of field testing(witnessing operation of the facility prior to start-up)by two Engineers. R13F will provide two engineers to witness 8 hours of start-up procedures by the Contractor. RBF will provide 4 hours of site review by two Engineers after completion of start-up procedures and will develop a punch list of items the Contractor must complete prior to project acceptance by the City. Task 3.23 Record Drawing Preparation. RAF will prepare record drawings based upon redlined drawings provided by the Contractor and the City's Inspector. Task 3.2.8 Miscellaneous Services. RBF will provide other miscrllaneous services including attending meetings or site visits not otherwise indicated above, plan revisions (if necessary) or other tasks as requested by the City during the course of the work on a time and material basis. The fee for the work outlined above is indicated in the attached fee table. An allotment for direct costs and other expenses will be billed as indicated in the attached fee table and the original proposal dated February 15,2000. If you have any questions,please call me at(949) 855-3646. Sincere , Steven R. Speakman,P.A. Project Manager H.\p4ara\1010060"dmiu\coutract\Adderi4um2_3\Combmud 2 and 3utr wWcadurm2_3 SQW_f'imal.wpd pe: Accounting, file s INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION WAIVER MODIFICATION REQUEST 1. Requested by: Debbie DeBow, Public Works Department 2. Date: November 1, 2004 3. Name of contractor/permittee: RBF Consulting 4. Description of work to be performed: Engineering service to support separate existing Well No. 12 construction contract 5. Value and length of contract: Contract Amendment to total of$334,911; three (3) years 6. Waiver/modification request: $100,000 deductible/professional liability and cancellation 7. Reason for request and why it should be granted: Unable to comply with the city's zero deductible and cancellation clause wording requirements ? 8. Identify the risks to the City in approving this waiver/modification: None. Departm ead Signature Date: w APPROVALS,. z Approvalsmust'be obtained`in;the-order listed on,this form Two approvals are required 7.. for a request to be granted Approval from thethy Qdmm►strator's'Offiee is only Tequ.ired if Risk=Management and the,City�tto�ney s'0ffice,disagreeu 1. Risk Management/IA l� i " !� .Approved ❑ Denied C Signature Date 2. City Attorneys Office Approved ❑ Denied / L z Signature Date 3. City Administrator's Office ❑ Approved ❑ Den ied . Signature Date If approved the completed waiVer/modifcation.eequest is to be submitted#off he City Attorney's;Office along with the contract for approve( Once the contract has been approved, fhis form:is to°6e.filedwitti'the R sk:Management Divlsionnof Administrative'.Servicesi__J Insurance&Indemnification Waiver . 11/1/2004 3:25 PM suf ', INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION WAIVER £f MODIFICATION REQUEST 1. Requested by: Debbie DeBow, Public Works Department 2. Date: November 1, 2004 3. Name of contractor/permittee: RBF Consulting 4. Description of work to be performed: Engineering service to support separate existing Well No. 12 construction contract 5. Value and length of contract: Contract Amendment to total of$334,911; three (3) years 6. Waiver/modification request: $100,000 deductible/professional liability and cancellation 7. Reason for request and why it should be granted: Unable to comply with the city's zero deductible and cancellation clause wording requirements ? 8. Identify the risks to the City in approving this waiver/modification: None. ►Ilzlcm Departm ead Signature Date: ;APPROVALS Approvals must.be obtained in,the order listed on this foam_ Twoapprovels are required for a request to be.granted, Approval from the City Administrator s Office is only requ,i"red if Risk:Mana ement and the Cif torne s sag Office diree: 9 Y,�t. Y 1. Risk Management iApproved El Denied / y/`� / Signature Date 2. City Attorney's Office Approved ❑ Denied / L Signature Da e 3. City Administrator's Office ❑ Approved ❑ Denied Signature Date 3 If approved; the completed waiver/modifcation4equest is to be submitte( -to the City Attorney Office`along,with the contract fog appFoval Once the_contract-lias been approved 'this'form is to be.filed:with`the Risk Management;Divisior of Admirnstrative�Services Insurance& Indemnification Waiver 11/1/2004 3:25 PM . tmr y ' i CE D INDEM I 1 ATION WAIVER IN AN N MODIFICATION R UEST RECEIVED 1. Requested by: RBF Consulting cl,,� &�vwo S n" v'� JUN 10 2004 2. Date: May 28, 2004 ;ityoftlunnng[onBeach 3. Name of contractor/permittee: RBF Consulting CttyAttomey'sOffice 4. Description of work to be performed: Preparation of recirculated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Poseidon Desalination Plant 5. Value and length of contract: $136,865 (one year contract) 6. Waiver/modification request: Allow a $100,000 deductible 1 7. Reason for request and why it should be granted: RBF Consulting prepared the original EIR. The previous contract for the EIR did not have a "no deductible" requirement and now a new contract is needed to complete the proiect. 8. Identify the risks to the City.in approving this waiver/modification: RBF Consulting would have to cover the $100,000 deductible when a claim is made on the policy. IV L � Department Head Signature Date: APPROVALS Approvals must be obtained in the order listed on this form. Two approvals:are required . for:;a request to be granted.: Approval from the City Administrator's Office.is only required if Risk Management and the::City Attomey's Office:disagree. 1. Ri k Management Approved ❑ Denied G Signature Date 2. City Attorney's Office �pproved. ❑ Deniedjf:� Signature Date 3. City Administrator's Office ❑ Approved ❑ Denied Signature Date Ifapproved, the:completed waiver/modification request Is to be submitted to the_ CiW.Attorneys Office along with the contract for approval Once the contract has been approved, thls form Is to- filed With he Risk Management Division of Admlrnstrative Sennces Inriirnnra R IndAmnifinn inn WnivAr/Rarirr.FIP1 .ri/7R/7nnd 11 14 AM Client#:6255 RBFCONSUL ACO D,M CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 0512812004N"' PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Dealey,Renton&Associates �� ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE P.O.Box 10550 r_ p HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Santa Ana,CA 92711-0550 l'�• ~' 714 427-6810 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED a, 'T INSURER A. Travelers Property Cas Co of Amerl RBF Consulting lNA•�y INSURERS: Hartford Fire Ins.Co. PO Box 57057 ' INSURERC: Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. Irvine,CA 92619-7057 d U �� INsuRERD: Underwriters at Lloyd's Landon S6 INSURER I_ COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. NSR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION M LIMITS DATE IMMIDOPM DATE DDIM A GENERAL LIABILITY P63050OD409203 11/30/03 11/30/04 EACH OCCURRENCE $1 000 000 X COMMERCULLGENERALLIAMUTY FIRE DAMAGE(My on.S.) $1000000 CLAIMS MADE ❑X OCCUR INDP.CONTRACTORS MED EXP(Any one person) $5 000 X CONTRACTUAL INCLUDED. PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $1000000 X BFPD.XCU GENERAL AGO REGATE $2 000 000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIM IT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMPIOPAGG s2,000,000 POLICY X PRO- X LOC B auroMoalLE LIABILITY 57UENTL0126 11/30/03 11/30/04 COMBINED SINGLE LIMB $1 000 000 X ANY AUTO Me accident) r r ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) X HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY X NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGG $ C EXCESS LIABILITY XSM00097333165 11/30/03 11/30/04 EACH OCCURRENCE $10 000 000 X OCCUR CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $10 00O 000 PROFESSIONAL $ DEDUCTIBLE LIABILITY IS $ RETENTION $ EXCLUDED. $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC TATU OTH- _UMITSS EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYFEI$ E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMB 1$ D OTHER Professional P1039400 11/30/03 11/30/04 $1,000,000 Per Claim lability $2,000,000 Anni Aggr. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSIVEHICLESIEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS JENNI U WGRATH,Ck Amorney General Liability policy excludes claims arising out of the performance of professional services. This certificate rescinds and replaces the certificate Issued on 3/1/04 By Pau)D'Alwsandeo Re: All Operations as performed by Named Insured. Aesistant City Attorney (See Attached Descriptions) CERTIFICATE HOLDER ADDmONALINSURED:INSURERLETTER: CANCELLATION Tan DaX Notice for Non-Payment of Premium SHOULD ANY OF TH E AB OVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION City of Huntington Beach DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILLj0ffjeMQMW MAIL 30_DAYSWRITTEN Attn:Mr.Bankey,Planning Dept. N0710ETOTHE CERTIFICATE HOLDERNAMED TOTHE LEFT,B 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25-S(7197)1 of 2 #M81822 LL ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 f DESCRIPTIONS (Continued from.Page 1) City of Huntington Beach,Its agents,officers,and employees are Additional Insured as respects to General Liability.Primary and Non Contributing coverage applies to GL. Reduced Deductible:$10.9jOW. (AI/PR/Reduced Ded/X) AMS 25.3(07/97)2 of 2 #M81822 _ERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE OP ID DATI:,MIVII°°'YY RBFCO-1 07 07 04 I THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION boo D ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE .ited Captive Ins. Brokers HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR p-51 Newhope St. , Ste 211 (eel "1�19) ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW, untain Valley CA 92708 hone: 714-708-4370 Fax:714-708-2300 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED c _ I V� INSURER A: U.S. Fidelity and Guarani o. /li• 4��(Y/(` INSURER B: RBF Consulting INSURER C: 14725 Alton Parkway INSURER D: Irvine CA 92718 �- INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTRINBRE TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE MWDD/YY DATE MWDD/YY LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ "MACOMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY E PREMISES Ea occurence $ CLAIMS MADE OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $ PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG b POLICY 7 PRO LOC JECT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ ANY AUTO (Ea accident) ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) $ HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $ NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY - AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGG $ EXCESS/UMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S OCCUR CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND X I TORY LIMITS I I ER A EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY D123W00096 07/01/04 07/01/05 E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $1000000 ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $1000000 If yes,describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $1000000 OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS *10 days notice of cancellation for non-payment of premium. APPROVED AS TO FOi� ' JENNIFER McGRATH,City Attoe. By Paul D'Aleeaanclro Assistant City Attorney CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION C I TYH-1 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILL EMAIL *30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL City of Huntington Beach IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR 2000 Main Street REPRESENTATIVES. Huntington Beach CA 92648 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Mark Barrie ACORD 25(2001/08) 0 ACORD CORPORATION 1988 w POLICY NUMBER: P63050OD409203 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES or CONTRACTORS (FORM B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART J SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: City of Huntington Beach Attn: Mr. Bankey, Planning Dept . 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule,but only with respect to liability arising out of"your work"for that insured by or for you. Schedule Continued: its agents, officers, and employees PRIMARY INSURANCE: IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THIS INSURANCE IS PRIMARY AND ANY OTHER INSURANCE MAINTAINED BY THE ADDITIONAL INSURED SHALL BE EXCESS ONLY AND NOT CONTRIBUTING WITH THIS INSURANCE. CG 20 10 11 85 I RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS SUBJECT: Approve Amendment No. 2 to Agreement for Water Well No. 12 Pump and Facilities Installation COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 15, 2004 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached ❑ Not Applicable N Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached ❑ Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached ❑ Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) Attached (Signed in full by the City Attorne ) Not Applicable El Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. Attached ElNot Applicable N (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Certificates of Insurance (Approved b the CityAttorne Attached Ely y� Not Applicable ed ❑ Fiscal Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Attachch Applicable ❑ Bonds (If applicable) AttachedNot Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached ElNot Applicable N Commission, Board or Committee Re ort If applicable Attached El p ( pp � Not A licable Find in s/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached El g pp Not Applicable EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS REVIEWED RETURNED FORWARDED Administrative Staff ( ) ( ) Assistant City Administrator (Initial) ( ) City Administrator Initial ( ) City Clerk ( ) EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM: Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use RCA Author: D. De Bow H >�' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION pc�vt. rlvi aJ HUNTINGTON BEACH �— (jA ,City Clerk Office of the City Clerk Liz Ehring, Deputy City Clerk II To: Date: < < d Meeting Date: f� /S O - Agenda Item: Proposed City Council Agenda Items: The City Clerk's Office/City Administrator's Office must return your agenda item due to the following requirements that have not been met. When your Agenda Item is ready to resubmit,please return to: E} , Administration 1. Signature(s)Needed A On RCA B On Agreement C Other 2. Attachments A Missing B Not identified C Other 3. Exhibits A Missing B Not identified C Other 4. Insurance Certificate(Proof Of Insurance) A Not attached B Not approved by City Attorney's Office C Signed form notifying City Clerk that department will be responsible for obtaining insurance certificate on this item.(See form attached) 5.. Wording On Req est For Council Action(RCA)Unclear ef A Recommended Action on RCA not complete B Clarification needed on RCA C Other 6. City Attorney Approval Required 7. Agreement Needs To Be Changed A Page No. 8. Other G:agenda/miscJm_&orm J CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL OF ITEM APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL/ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE: March 8, 2002 TO: RBF Consulting ATTENTION: Douglas J. Frost Name 14725 Alton Parkway DEPARTMENT: Street Irvine, CA 92618-2027 REGARDING: Amendment No. 1 to City,State,Zip Agreement re: CC 1119 See Attached Action Agenda Item E-4 Date of Approval 3/4/02 Enclosed For Your Records Is An Executed Copy Of The Above Referenced Agenda Item. Remarks: Connie Brockway City Clerk Attachments: Action Agenda Page x Agreement x Bonds Insurance x RCA Deed Other CC: R. Beardsley DPW x x x Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other T Rulla npW X x x Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name_ Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other C. Mendoza Risk Mgmt x x Name Department RCA Insurance (Telephone:714-536-5227) ` CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH T,YNu VVJ MEETING DATE: March 4, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 02-022 Council/Agency Meeting Held: 43—d4�a2 Deferred/Continued to: A roved ❑ Conditi all Ap roved ❑ Denied gyp, City CI k s Signature 4h PI Council Meeting Date: March 4, 2002 Department ID Number: =PW 02-022 o -Z CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH n REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBEIRS x c,O BMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, City Administrator a?,SP >r— SUBJECT:PREPARED BY: Robert F. Beardsley, Director of Public Works Amend Agreement for Consulting Services on.Water Well No. 12 Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: It is necessary to amend the well design contract due to major changes in the project layout and boundaries resulting from the revised Boeing Specific Plan, which modifies the well site. Funding Source: Funds in the amount of $29,128 are budgeted in the Water Master Plan Fund, Conjunctive Use Wells, Professional Services Account No. 50791011.69365. Recommended Action: Motion to: 1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement betweeen the City of Huntington Beach and RBF Consulting for Consulting Services for Water Well No. 12 Pump and Facilities Installation (CC-1119); and 2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the amendment. Alternative Action(s): 1. Deny approval and direct staff accordingly. �4 G:\R C A\2002\02-22 March 4 Rulla (Amend RBF Agreement).doc -2- 2/19/021:00 PM REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: March 4, 2002 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 02-022 Analysis: kBF Consulting (RBF) was selected through a qualifications-based selection (QBS) process to design the permanent facilities for Water Well No. 12. Following the City's selection of RBF, Boeing approached the City to amend its McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11 located adjacent to the City's water well site. Because the major changes proposed by Boeing would dramatically affect access, pipeline alignments, grading and other issues related to development of the water well, staff directed RBF to stop well design work until various issues with Boeing were resolved. This agreed upon plan is mutually beneficial. The revised project location provides access to the well site from Rancho Road rather than from private Astronautics Drive or through private property easements. Well site boundaries will change allowing better,layout for operation and better access for maintenance, deliveries and emergency access. Also, Boeing will be required to complete various pipeline improvements sooner than previously planned. The various documents with Boeing, including the amended EIR, Specific Plan and Water Facilities Agreement, are being processed. Sufficient information is now available for RBF to resume the well design. The additional design costs are justified and offset by the benefits gained by the City for the well site modifications. To complete the design, RBF must make significant design changes and resubmit the entire Project Site Plan to the Planning Department for entitlement processing. RBF estimates it will require approximately eight months to complete the entire well design and have the construction project ready to advertise. Public Works Commission Review: Not required at this time. Environmental Status: Environmental analysis tasks are included within the RBF Agreement. Attachment(sl: NumberCity Clerk's Page Description1 Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with RBF Consulting 2 Vicinity Map RCA Author: T. Rullwirn C:\windows\TEMP\02-22 March 4 Rulla(Amend RBF Agreement).doc -3- 02/22/02 8:51 AM ATTACHMENT .# 1 AMENDMENT NO. I TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST &ASSOCIATES,NOW KNOWN AS "RBF CONSULTING" FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12 PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION(CC 1119) THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into the 4th day of March , 2002, by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and RBF CONSULTING (formerly known as ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST &ASSOCIATES), a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT. WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT are parties to that certain agreement, dated May 1, 2000, entitled"Professional Services Contract Between the City of Huntington Beach and Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates for Consulting Services which agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Original Agreement,"and Since the execution of the Original Agreement, CITY has requested additional work from CONSULTANT and CONSULTANT has agreed to perform such work; and CITY and CONSULTANT wish to amend the Original Agreement to reflect the additional work to be performed by CONSULTANT and the additional compensation to be paid in consideration thereof by CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: I. ADDITIONAL WORK CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY such additional services as required by CITY, including services as described in CONSULTANT's letter to CITY dated January 18, 2002, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit"A," and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 2. ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION In consideration of the additional services to be performed hereunder as described in Section 1 above, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT as full payment for services rendered, an additional sum not to exceed Twenty Nine Thousand One Hundred Twenty Eight Dollars ($29,128.00). 3. REAFFIRMATION Except as specifically modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 02agree/bein amend/2/7/02 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized offices the day, month and.year first above written. RBF CONSULTING, INC., CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California By: print name ITS: (circle one)Chainnan/Presiden Cic,President Mayor Pro Tem AND ATTEST- By: AamAeq1 G� qw, CiiyClerk e�a8-az print name ITS: (circle one)Secretary/Chief Financial Officer/Asst. Secretary-Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: v L Ci y Attorney REVIEWED AND APPROVED: l),• I INITIAT PROVED. City ministrator Director of P is Works L 02agree/bein amend/2/7/02 2 Exhibit A WF CONSULTING January 18, 2002 JN 10-100606 Mr. Tom Rulla, P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Water Well No. 12 Pump & Facilities Installation -Addendum No. 1. Dear Mr. Rulla: In December of 2000, the Boeing Plan for the area surrounding the subject project site was being modified and RBF put the project on hold while still providing support services during this process. On December 20,2001 it was indicated that the changes to the Boeing Plan are nearing completion and that it is time to start work on the project again and RBF was asked to prepare an addendum to the contract to make the necessary modifications to reflect the changes by Boeing. The following table outlines the tasks and associated fees required to complete this additional work. Task No. Task Description Fee 1 Revise Site Plan $4,059 2 Revise Grading Plan $4,202 3 Revise Sections and Details $3,546 4 Revise Planning Department Review Package $3,888 5 Planning Department Processing $2,048 6 Update Calculations, Layouts, &Preliminary Design $6,538 7 Additional Coordination and Meetings $3,648 8 Reprographics/Expenses $1,200 Total $29,128 PLANNING ■ DESIGN ■ CONSTRUCTION 14725 Alton Parkway, Irvine,CA 92618-2027 ■ P.O.Box 57057,Irvine,CA 92619-7057 ■ 949.472.3505 ■ Fax 949.472.8373 Offices located throughout California,Arizona&Nevada ■ www.RBF.com printed on recycled paper s r Mr.Tom Rulla Exhibit A January 18,2002 Page 2 We at RBF Consulting appreciate this opportunity to provide continuing engineering services to the City of Huntington Beach. Please sign below and return this letter so we can start up our work effort. If you have any questions,please call me at(949)855-3646,or Mr.Larry Gallery at(949)855-3615. Sincerely, Approved By: Steven R. Spe an, P.E. Assistant Project Manager City of Huntington Beach Enclosures PC: Accounting,LEG,file H:\pdata\10100606\office\wpwin\addendumt rev.wpd FEB-08-02 10:31AM FROM-RBF CONSULTING +949 T-359 P.03/04 F-954 AGLaMIJ. UCK i INUA i r- ur LIADILI i Y INbUKANILM 1 1—129/01 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Dealey, Renton & Associates ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE P. 0. 80x 10550 HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY ThE POLICIES BELOW. Santa Ana, CA 92711-05 0 714 4 2 7-6 810 Z INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE MURED �y yL uvsumAA. Travelers Indemnit Co. of "Illino RBF Consulting l l� ^f' tN&MERG. National Union Fire Ins Co of Pig PO Box 57057 VAUL R -- " Irvine, CA 92619-7057 INsuRERt: Underwriters at Lloyd's- London Bk �-117 uvsuRERo:....... .._. . _ . .. - i NSuRER E. COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ASOYE FOR TmE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITnSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTnER DOCUMENT wlTn RESPECT TO wnlCti TnIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. TnE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED r+EREIN IS SuB.IEC'r TO ALL TmS TERMS,EACLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SuCn POLICIES AGGREGATE Lim)TS SHOWN MAY nAvE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAMS sR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER PDA EFF v PT EYPRATION LIMITS A awout.uAwan P630500D409201 11/30/01 11/30/02 E!grOCCURRENCE. _ s1, 0 )0� Q00 zrx —PD. MERCwLGENERALLMILITY FIRE DAMAGE tAny an.t to s1, 000, 000 CNYMS MADE U Wr occuR IMP CONTRACTORS MEQ ExP Y ana paman) s5 000 NTRACTUAL IS INCLUDED. PERSONAL&AOv IwuRY sl 000 000 XCU, OCP GENERAL AGGREGATE S2 0 0 0 000 G 'L AGGREGATE LIN rf APPLIES PER PRODUCTS:COmP,Op AGG E 2, 0 0 0 F 0 0 0_ POLICY 91 IPVRr M LOC A AUTOMOBILE LIAMwTY P 810 5 0 O D 4 0 9 2 01 11/30/01 11/30/02 OOq&NEO SINGLE LIM+T X ANY AUTO lEa w.awlt) 11, 000, 00 0 ALL OWNED AUTO; 600114 IrQURr SCnEDuLEDAUTOS (P-pow) 5 X rpREDAUTOS BODILY INJURY .9 -- X NONGWNEOAUTOS tpwatx,adnj PROPERTY DAMAGE (Par i0r~t) GARA4EWANU41Y AUTOONLY-EAACCIDENT S ANY AUTO OTHER Trues EA ACC S--—_-- ANTO ONLY �Ga L B Excess uABIUTY B E 8 715 7 6 2 11/30/01 11/30/02 EAcm occwAgamce 51 , 0 0 0. 0 0_ X OCCUR CLAIMS MADE AC4REGATE b 10 O 00, 00C s oEQueYIeLE #4i 110 'A p 0.1�'✓T �QZ (;. RETENTION S OJT ® WORKERS COMPENSATtOh AND v: `�A�•.v" C ATV _ EMPLOYERS WABI WTY "``` E L EACh ACCIDENT S - '• .i 6� C 6 DISEA-ISE-E04 E LOYEE S E L DISEASE-POUCY LIMB I S C OTHER Professional P0043"160 11/30/01 11/30/02 $1. 000, 000 Per Claim Liability $2, 000, 000 Annl Aggr. DESCRIPTION OF OPEAAMONSILOCATIOKMEt%CLES)EsCLuSIONS AMID Br ENDORSENENT4PEgAL PROwSIONS Re: All Operations as performed by Named Insured. City of Huntington Beach, its agents, officers, and employees are Additional Insured as respects to General Liability. Primary and Non Contributing coverage applies to GL. (AI/PR/X) CERTIFICATE HOLDER ADDMM.ALNSuRED.wSuRERLETTER', CANCELLATIONUna-2ayMpnr S"OuLD ANVOF Th E ABOvE DESCRIBED POLICtES BE CANCELLED B EFORE Th E ExAUTION City of Huntington Beach DATE THEREOF.The ISSupNG DNSuAEA WILL Jyppgl XX0WAL 3.a- DAYS wRITTEN Attn: Mr. Bankey, Planning Dept. NOTICETOThECERTIRCATEhOLDERN/wEDTOThELEFT 3H4KX 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 AUThOR2ED REPRESENT YE ACORD 264(TJS7)1 of 1 #M6 8 5 51 K 0 ACORO CORPORATION 1988 FEB-08-02 10:31AM FROM-RBF CONSULTING +949 T-359 P.02/04 F-954 AC ORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MAPODMrI IFCO 1 07/16/01 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE PrideMark Insurance HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOSS NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR 1820 E. First St. , Ste #500 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Santa Ana CA 92705 Phone: 714-569-2700 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED INSURER Fidelity.and Guaranty.Ins. Co. C�j C ININSURER B. - - R 1fA1A� Ot aF Consulting r T 4uRERC 14725 Alton Parkway � [� INSURER Irvine CA 92718 �,�i -- - - - -- INSURER E COVERAGES TnE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW MAvE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOTwfMSTANDING ANY REQVIR6MENT.TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CON1RACf OR OTHER DOCuMENT wITH RESPECT TO WHICH Trn4 CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE InSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED MEREIn Id SuBACT TO ALL THE TERMS EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES AGCRECATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY rAvE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS _- (it�slt t�C?WFECTIOE POLiC�EXPIRA'[I�N --- LIMITS L R TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY nuMBER DATE MMID DATE M D GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S _ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY FIRE DAMAGE(Any ono fire) S CLAIMS MADE F7 OCCUR MED EXP(Any one pelsoru S PERSONAL u AOv INJURY_ E _ GENERAL AGGRECATE b ^^- GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPuES PER. PRODUCTS-COMP/OP ACG S POLICY P� f7 LDc -� AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT ANY AUTO (Ed ace'dem) E _ ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AuTOS IPer pemmlMIRED AUTOS AUTOS BODILY INjURr f rvON-OWNED AUYOS (Per accddnij PROPERTY DAMAGE S I1'eracg4or4) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY.EA ACCIDENT S ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ - C TO ORml; AUTO ONLY AGG $ EXCESSLA&LIri neT Vj�I EACH OCCURRENCE $ -3A]L y,-U T.1.. ay. OCCUR 17 CLAIM$MADE (' t a7 tar AGGREGATE S DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION s s WORKERS COMPENSATION AND X TORY LInMTS' ER. A EMPLOYERS'LABILITY 1)123W00006 07/01/01 07/01/02 EL EACMACCIDENT 151,000,000 EL DISEASE•EA EMPLOYE S 1 000 000 E I. DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT S 1,000,000 OTnER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS&OCATIONSNEMICLESiEXCLUS10N5 ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT#SPECIAL PROV1510nS Re: All operations CERTIFICATE HOLDER N 70MONALINsuRED.INsuRERLETTER:_ CANCELLATION • CITYH-1 SHOuLO ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES 8E CANCELLED BEFORE THE EAPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSuINGINSuRER vA6LAmEIEAYOR4O MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE I E8(fKaNctfR63O DG 503tV City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach CA 92648 �RcseI�TATfvEs. Mark Barrie ACORD 25-S(7197) OACORD CORPORATION 1988 FEB-08-02 10:31AM FROM-RBF CONSULTING +949 T-359 P.04/04 F-954 POLICY NUMBER: P630SOOD409201 COMMERCIAL.GENERAL LIABILITY THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - DINNERS, LESSEES or CONTRACTORS (FORM B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: Uj�1✓�MM COMMERCIAL_GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART Q� W SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization. City of Huntington Beach Attn: Mr. Bankey, Planning Dept . 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (If no entry appears aDove, information required to Complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement) WHO IS AN INSURED(Section II)is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule, nut only with respect to liability arising out of"your work"for that insured Dy or for you. Schedule Continued: its agents, officers, and employees PRIMARY INSURANCE: IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THIS INSURANCE IS PRIMARY AND ANY OTHER INSURANCE MAINTAINED BY THE ADDITIONAL INSURED SHALL BE EXCESS ONLY AND NOT CONTRIBUTING WITH THIS INSURANCE. nVFROVrD AS TO FORM: GALL T'JTTON, City Attorue:v i� DeP .R Ott-r",a aA Bv: � � . Z z0 CG20101185 ATTACHMENT #2 PROJECT: WA TER WELL NO. 12 PUMP AND FACILI TIES INS TALLA TION o® s9ti SOLSA A%S CIO Me FADDEN A 3 EDINCER AVE. o �^ _ re � o N I AVE. v 3 m WARNER AVE. .o SLATER AVE. 1 . � 405 p 90 TALBERT AVE. ELLIS AVE. CARFIEL AVE. fi RKT N AVE. 3 r ADAMS AVE. IND DLISf AVE. TLANTA AVE. q WMILTON •AVE . i �A. NIN ME M y CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH VICINITY M A P DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS wn�n.ow.en..w.e+ RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Public Works SUBJECT: Amend Agreement for Consulting Services Well No. 12 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: March 4, 2002 RCA ATTACH ME N TS STATU S Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attorney) Attached Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorne ) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement Unbudget, over$5,000 Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report If applicable) Not Applicable Commission, Board or Committee Report If applicable) Not Applicable Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Not Applicable EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS; REVIEWSD RETURNED FORWARDE Administrative Staff EKE Assistant City Administrator Initial City Administrator Initial City Clerk EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM. (Below • . • Only) RCA Author: T. Rulla Date/Time 02/24/2002 3:50:18 PM City of Huntington Beach Page 1 Office of the City Clerk Records Ref Category Subject Entered Status Document Expires Box ID Label p BE 600.10 05/04/2000 Active 15189 .A OFF BERT BEIN,WILLIAM FROST&ASSOCIATES- Professional Services Contract fW Consulting Services IiI& Water Well hkiw 12 Pump as Facilities Installation (CC-1119) 6/2002 6HO88 A: 1 31V102 Total Records Detailed: 1 I i r 1'DPy4 —V-A6100*A Council/Agency Meeting Held: 5 — 1 , 63 Deferred/Continued to: Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied . Ci y r 's Signature Council Meeting Date: May 1, 2000 Department ID Number: PW 00-31 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR ACTION =�- a SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL a r" ._.. = SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 20/ T PREPARED BY: ROBERT F. BEARDSLEY, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORK SUBJECT: EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOE3.lWAi -ER WELL NO. 12 PUMP AND FACILITIES DESIGN Statement of Issue, Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Should the City hire a professional civil engineering consultant to design the Water Well No. 12 pump and facilities installation? Funding Source: Funds are available in the Water Capital Improvements. Recommended Action: Motion to: 1. Approve the attached Professional Services Contract with Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) for detailed design and construction support for Water Well No. 12; and authorize execution by the Mayor and City Clerk; and 2. Approve recommendations from.the Insurance Settlement Committee to modify the hold harmless condition; and 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to expend up to $265,000 to cover contract costs of $223,307, an estimated contingency of $24,000, and supplemental expenditures of $17,693. Alternative Action(s): 1. Deny approval of the contract and direct staff accordingly. This action will delay development of this new water well. Analysis: Domestic Water Well No. 12 is located in the Boeing Specific Plan Area, near the intersection of Astronautics Avenue and Rancho Road (see Attachment 1). It was originally drilled in late 1995 as part of the City's participation with the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Conjunctive Use Well Program. As an incentive for the City to develop additional domestic water wells, thereby reducing its reliance on import water, the County advances funding and/or provides low interest loans to the City for its participation in this program. _ l Council/Agency Meeting Held: S Deferred/Continued to: Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied . Ci y r 's Signature Council Meeting Date: May 1, 2000 Department ID Number: PW 00-31 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR ACTION SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL - SUBMITTED BY: RAY SILVER, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 40V PREPARED BY: ROBERT F. BEARDSLEY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORK SUBJECT: EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FORIWATER WELL NO. 12 PUMP AND FACILITIES DESIGN Fs- of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Should the City hire a professional civil engineering consultant to design the Water Well No. 12 pump and facilities installation? Funding Source: Funds are available in the Water Capital Improvements. Recommended Action: Motion to: 1. Approve the attached Professional Services Contract with Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) for detailed design and construction support for Water Well No. 12; and authorize execution by the Mayor and City Clerk; and 2. Approve recommendations from.the Insurance Settlement Committee to modify the hold harmless condition; and 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to expend up to $265,000 to cover contract costs of $223,307, an estimated_ contingency of $24,000, and supplemental expenditures of $17,693. Alternative Action(s): 1. Deny approval of the contract and direct staff accordingly. This action will delay development of this new water well. Analysis: Domestic Water Well No. .12 is located in the Boeing Specific Plan Area, near the intersection of Astronautics Avenue and Rancho Road (see Attachment 1). It was originally drilled in late 1995 as part of the City's participation with the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Conjunctive Use Well Program. As an incentive for the City to develop additional domestic water wells, thereby reducing its reliance on import water, the County advances funding and/or provides low interest loans to the City for its participation in this program. �-J 1 REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: May 1, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 00-31 This new water well was extensively tested because of concerns regarding its water quality. It was concluded that the water meets all water quality standards, that the well design may now be completed and the water introduced directly into the City's water distribution system. The RFQ/RFP process began on November 29, 1999, by staff soliciting Requests for Qualifications (RFQs) to the following engineering consultants: AKM Consulting Engineers* Harris & Associates ASL HDR Engineering Black & Veatch John Carollo Engineers Boyle Engineering* Keith Companies, The* Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants* Cash & Associates Luhdorff& Scalmanini CGvL Parsons Engineering Science* CH2M Hill RMS Civiltec Engineering* RMS Daniel Boyle Engineering, Inc. Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates* David Evans & Assoc. SA Associates Fugro West, Inc. Sidawi & Associates Geomatrix Tetra Tech, Inc. Hall & Foreman, Inc.* Seven engineering firms (those denoted with an asterisk, above) submitted Statements of Qualifications (SOQs). The top three ranked firms (Boyle Engineering, RBF, Parsons) were invited to respond to a formal Request for Proposal (RFP). After careful consideration, it was determined that both Boyle and RBF were the best qualified, responsive and, capable of performing the work. Boyle was afforded the opportunity to clarify their proposal and RBF was asked to consider additional construction support services to balance the proposals. The evaluation concluded that RBF fully understood the scope of work and that their proposal was significantly more cost effective. Staff accepts and recommends the RBF proposal in the amount of $223,307 as a comprehensive proposal reasonable fee. This process is consistent with the City's policy of Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) for professional services. Public Works Commission Review: Not required at this time. When the design of this project is completed, it will be presented to both the Public Works Commission and City Council for review and approval, prior to bidding for construction. RCA Well No. 12.doc 04/19/00 1:21 PM REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: May 1, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 00-31 Environmental Status: Not applicable at this time. The tasks to be provided by RBF include an Environmental Analysis. Attachmentls): City Clerk's Page Number No. Description 1. Vicinity Map 2. Professional Services Contract 3. Approved Insurance Certificates and Endorsement 4. Settlement Committee Approval of Modified Hold Harmless Condition 5. Request for Proposals 64 -Qe in �-�ic,e 15 RCA Author: Tom Rulla:jm Ext.5528 G:ENG\RULLA\WELLS\WELL12 RCA RCA Well No. 12.doc 04/20/00 4:37 PM i, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL OF ITEM APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL/ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE: 05-19-00 TO: Robert. Bein,; William .Frost; �& Assoc. ATTENTION: T-awrence E. Gallery, P.E. Name 14725 Alton Parkway DEPARTMENT: V.P. Water Resources Street Irvine, CA 92618-2069 REGARDING: Consulting Services City,State,zip CC.No. 1119 See Attached Action Agenda Item Date of Approval Enclosed For Your Records Is An Executed Copy Of The Above Referenced Agenda Item: Remarks: Attached is Exhibit A to Contract, including requested fee schedule. Connie Brockway City Clerk Attachments: Action Agenda Page Agreement Bonds Insurance RCA Deed Other CC: Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Risk Management Dept Insurance GTollowup/Letters/cover]tr (Telephone:714-536-5227) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK CONNIE BROCKWAY CITY CLERK LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL OF ITEM APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL/ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE: TO: NIII&rp51¢� ATTENTION: Name �^ DEPARTMENT:�PP�i� �/). SpurGes Street REGARDING: City,State,Zip See Attached Action Agenda Item Date of Approval Enclosed For Your Records Is An Executed Copy Of The Above Referenced Agenda Item. Remarks: Connie Brockway City Clerk Attachments: Action Agenda Page Agreement ✓ Bonds Insurance RCA Deed Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Name Department RCA Agreement Insurance Other Risk Management Dept. Insurance G:Followup/L.etters/coverltr (Telephone:714-536.6227) ATTACHMENT # 1 PROJECT: WA TER WELL NO. 12 PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION 00� S , /1 BOLSA AVE. 00 Mc FAODEN AVE. 3 IEDINGER AVE. Q mG 4 Y U y W HaL AVE. m = u z =rn m u WARNERI AVE. N SLATER AVE. o1 405 C^ og TALBERT AVE. ELLIS AVE. v - 1 GARFIEL AVE. tA- yt RKT N AVE. ADAMS AVE.rA INO WAPOLIS--,.AVE. m r O N ATUWTA VE. 0 ,p HAMILTON AVE. Q� BANNING A l� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH VICINITY M A P DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS we�vdw�sv.sr.n� ATTACHMENT #2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12 PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION(CC 1119) THIS Agreement is made and entered into this 1st day of May 2000,by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & ASSOCIATES, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to provide consulting services for Water Well No. 12 Pump and Facilities installation(CC1119), and Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts have been complied with; and CONSULTANT has been selected to perform said services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in the Request for Proposal ("RFP"), and CONSULTANT's Proposal dated February 15, 2000 (both of which are hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A"), which are attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT." CONSULTANT hereby designates Lawrence E. Gallery, who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this Agreement. 1 7/k/OOagree/water well 12/4/5/00 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. 3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this Agreement. The services of CONSULTANT are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than two (2) years from the date of this Agreement. These times may be extended with the written permission of CITY. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be shown in the Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a fee not to exceed Two Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Three Hundred Seven dollars ($223,307). 5. PRIORITIES In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement, the CITY's RFP, or the CONSULTANT's Proposal, the following order of precedence shall govern: 1)Agreement, 2) the CONSULTANT's Proposal, and 3) the CITY's RFP. 6. EXTRA WORK In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A," or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSULTANT will undertake such 2 7/k/OOagree/water well 12/4/7/00 work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 7. METHOD OF PAYMENT A. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to progress payments toward the fixed fee set forth herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit "A." B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every memorandum, letter, report, calculation and other documentation prepared by CONSULTANT shall be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In.the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted. C. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall: 1) Reference this Agreement; 2) Describe the services performed; 3) Show the total amount of the payment due; 4) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULTANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; and 5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work n completed. 3 7/k/00agree/water well 12/4/5/00 C Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSULTANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement, CITY shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT in writing of the reasons for non-approval within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULTANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated as provided herein. D. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall.not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this Agreement. 8. DISPOSITION OF PLANS, ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT agrees that all materials prepared hereunder, including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall be turned over to CITY upon termination of this Agreement or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. In the event this Agreement is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY in the completion of the PROJECT or as it 4 7/1-JOOagree/water well 12/4/5/00 otherwise sees fit. Title to said materials shall pass to CITY upon payment of fees determined to be earned by CONSULTANT to the point of termination or completion of the PROJECT, whichever is applicable. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder. 9. HOLD HARMLESS CONSULTANT shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expenses, costs (including without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature) arising out of or in connection with negligent performance of this Agreement or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement except such loss or damage which-was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. 10. WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1861, CONSULTANT acknowledges awareness of Section 3700 et seq. of said Code, which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation; CONSULTANT covenants that it will comply with such provisions prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY from and against all claims, demands, payments, suit, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every nature and description, including attorney's fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against the CITY, for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall maintain workers' compensation insurance in an amount of not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000)bodily injury by accident, each 5 7/k/OOagree/water well 12/4/14/00 occurrence, One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000)bodily injury by disease, each employee, Two Hundred Fifty-Thousand Dollars ($250,000)bodily injury by disease, policy limit. CONSULTANT shall require all subcontractors to provide such workers' compensation insurance for all of the subcontractors' employees. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of waiver of subrogation under the terms of the workers' compensation insurance and CONSULTANT shall similarly require all.subcontractors to waive subrogation. 11. GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE In addition to the workers' compensation insurance and CONSULTANT's covenant to indemnify CITY, CONSULTANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY, a policy of general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage covering the PROJECT. The policy shall indemnify CONSULTANT, its officers, agents and employees, while acting within the scope of their duties, against any and all claims arising out of or in connection with the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not less than the following amount: combined single limit bodily injury and property damage, including products/completed operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of.$1,000,000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1,000,000 for this PROJECT. The policy shall name CITY, its agents, its officers, employees and volunteers as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage and that CONSULTANT's insurance shall be primary. Under no circumstances shall the above-mentioned insurance contain a self- insured retention, or a"deductible"or any other similar form of limitation on the required coverage. 6 7/k/00agree/water well 12/4/5/00 12. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall furnish a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. Said policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT's professional liability in an amount not less than 51,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate. A claims-made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the initiation of the scope of work (including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSULTANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following project completion, including the requirement of adding all additional insureds. C. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULTANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of at least two (2)years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this Agreement. D. The reporting of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. 13. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverages as required by this Agreement; the certificates shall: A. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; B. shall state that the policy is currently in force; and 7/k/00agree/water well 12/4/5/00 C. shall promise that such policies shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty(30) days prior written notice; however, ten (10) days prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSULTANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverages in force until the work under this Agreement is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement-for carrying the foregoing insurance coverages shall not derogate from the provisions for indemnification of CITY by CONSULTANT under the Agreement. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of all said policies of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on all insurance hereinabove required. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance,of this Agreement as an independent contractor herein and not as an employee of the CITY. CONSULTANT shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. 15. TERMINATION OF Agreement All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this Agreement by CITY shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as 8 7/k/00agree/water well 12/4/5/00 provided herein. In the event of termination, all finished and unfinished documents, exhibits, report, and evidence shall, at the option of the CITY, become its property and shall be delivered to it by CONSULTANT. .16. . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the express written consent of CITY. 17. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material produced as a result of this Agreement. 18. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this Agreement in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 19. NOTICES Any notice or special instructions required to be given in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY's Director of Public Works as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope,postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, addressed as follows: 9 7/k/OOagree/water well 12/4/5/00 TO CITY: TO CONSULTANT: Robert Beardsley Lawrence E. Gallery, P.E. Director of Public Works Vice President, Water Resources City of Huntington Beach Robert Bein, William Frost &Associates: 2000 Main Street 14725 Alton Parkway Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Irvine, CA 92618-2069 20. MODIFICATION No waiver or modification of any language in this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and duly executed by both parties. 21. IMMIGRATION CONSULTANT shall be responsible for-full compliance with the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. . 22. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSULTANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSULTANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 23. ATTORNEY'S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to enforce the terms and provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees. 10 7/k/00agree/water well 12/4/5/00 24. ENTIRETY The Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties respecting the subject matter of this Agreement and supercedes all prior understanding and agreements whether oral or in writing. The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth the entire Agreement between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through their authorized offices the day, month and year first above written. ROBERT BEIN, WILLIAM FROST & CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a ASSOCIATES municipal corporation of the State of Califo is B . Lawrence E. Gallery, Vice reside Mayor AND ATTEST: By: o� Doug l . Fr Chief Financial Officer City Clerk REVIEWED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Cit dministrator City Attorney f ' 3--00 �� INI APPROVED: rector of Public Works 11 7/k/00agree/water well 12/4/5/00 .:��\ :�� , ��` _ :- . «?©»� » . \ J ��y � - � \ \�� \ � \ � 2 . ( � � ��} :« �_ �� :. . . . :. . . �� : « . 2< _< �� Z 2\�\= - • ��2� �: ,�?» :t _ �« ^ a \ - - � > ®t : �� y �\ % .�� . \ _ _ \� \ < - \ � . �� - ��^� ` ��G�;� ^��-�«�� 1 ' M TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL, . .. . - CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL No. 12 PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION °* A••. ((ASH CONTRACT No. 1119) ' ,V6. . PREPARED FOR: `,'. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH --- : - , ROBERT BEIN, WILLum FROST & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS , PLANNERS & SURVEYORS February 15,2000 JN 10-100606 Thomas A. Rulla, P.E. Engineering Division, Public Works Department City of Huntington Beach City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Proposal for Professional Consulting Services Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation(Cash Contract No. 1119) Dear Mr. Rulla: Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) is pleased to submit this proposal to provide engineering services for the Water Well No. 12,Pump and Facilities Installation Project. Included in the proposal is our project approach which outlines key issues identified for the project and presents a work program to successfully complete each element of work. Some of the key items included in the approach are: ► A preliminary project layout which includes all components of the proposed well project and efficiently utilizes the available site area; ► A proposed conceptual architectural elevation which can be used for initial planning; and ► A discussion on the required plan processing and permits including identification of the required setback variances required. We appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal and should you have any questions,please do not hesitate to call me at(949) 855-3615. Very truly yours, Lawrence E. Gallery, P Vice President, Wat esources H:\GRP 13\pdata\10100606\Proposal\Letter.wpd Enclosure: Proposal (4 sets) Professional Service Since 1944 14725 ALTON PARKWAY, IRVINE,CA 92618-2069 • P.O. BOX 57057, IRVINE,CA 92619-7057•949.472.3505•FAX 949.472.8373 OFFICES LOCATED THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA,ARIZONA AND NEVADA•WEB SITE:www.RBF.com wmx T. rea raoa 1 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO. 11 19) Table of Contents f Section A: Project Approach and Work Plan . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 1. Project Understanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 2. Key Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 3. Scope of Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-4 Section B: Project Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 i Section C: Team Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 1. Key Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 2. Organizational Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-5 r Section D: Consultant's Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1 1. RBF Corporate Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1 2. Background and Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1 Appendix Insurance Information 1 I � i I _ I SECTION PROJECT APPROACH OR PLAN _1 �i PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT No.1119) i Section A Project Approach and Work Plan RBF has developed a methodology.for successfully completing:engineenng ` projects of this type on time or ahead of schedule, and within budget. This ' methodology is based on 55 years of engineering experience. We have found that _. the best formula for success is to team qualified and experienced individuals who have worked successfully together on other projects,and support them with our firm's multi-disciplinary staff and selected specialty subconsultants. I RBF team members have visited the project site in.order to more clearly understand the proposed project. A description of our project understanding and j project approach is provided below. Critical Issues are identified and a scope of work has been developed. 1. Project Understanding This project involves equipping of the new Huntington Beach Well No. 12,a conjunctive.use well which was drilled in 1995 and which recently successfully passed water quality testing procedures. Services are to I include the detailed design of a new vertical turbine deep well pump driven by a natural gas engine with a LPG back-up system. Chemical systems to be designed include 1)chloramination facilities consisting of 1 ton elemental chlorine containers and an ammonium hydroxide system and 2)fluoridation.facilities. 2. Key Issues A. Pump and Engine Design The City has provided specific hydraulic design parameters for the sizing of the pump which include the following: • Design Flow Rate No. 1: 3,000 gpm(at full speed) • Design Flow Rate No. 2: 1,500 gpm(at reduced speed) • Pump Bowl Elevation: 200 feet below ground surface • Pump Discharge Pressure: 75 psi at pump outlet These design parameters,along with others listed in the RFP,will be compared with information from the CDM Well Construction Report provided in the RFP,and with data collected and then verified by RBF Engineers. The RFP also indicated several components of the pump and engine system which the City has successfully utilized at other well sites within the City and which the City wishes to use on this project. During the pre-proposal meeting the City also indicated a preference to specific equipment. This equipment includes the following items. • Waukesha VHP Series Naturally Aspirated Gas Engine (Model F3521G) Murphy 5001550 Automatic Engine Controller and Central Controller • Amarillo Right Angle Pump Drive • Freeflow Products Inline Heat Exchanger • Ransome Gas Vaporizer/Mixer for LPG(Propane) Back-up System A-1 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO.1119) Other pump and motor options, such as the following,will be discussed with City staff: • Oil or water pump shaft pre lubrication • Enclosed or open shaft • Non reverse ratchet • Packing gland or mechanical seals • Acceptable pump manufacturers • Lube Oil Level Regulators with new and waste oil reservoirs • Emission Controller and Air Fuel Ratio Controller The pump and engine will be designed to normally operate 24 hours a day,7 days a week like other City wells. When the pump does need to shut-down for maintenance or other reason,the automatic shut-off valve on the pipeline connected.to the distribution system will slowly come to a completely closed position while the shut-off valve on the discharge to waste line will slowly open. Water will pump to waste for a given amount of time and then the pump and engine will shut down. The reverse process occurs when the pump starts up. Control will be both local and remote via the City's SCADA system. B. Site and Building Layout and Building Design The project is located within the McDonnell Centre Buisiness Park Specific Plan No. 11 which has 25 foot front setbacks and 10 foot rear and side setbacks. Exhibit 1 shows the space available on the site with these set backs. It is apparent that setback variances will need to be . .obtained in order to successfully implement this project. Since the wellhead position is fixed and the parcel is small and uniquely shaped it was a challenge to lay out a building which will serve all the required functions. RBF has completed a preliminary layout and building footprint with operation and maintenance in mind and that provides the following advantages al (See Exhibits 2 and 3): • Easy access to wellhead for pump removal via removable roof and wall Panels which are an integrated part of the building aesthetics; • The engine and equipment is accessible from Rancho Road through a rollup door; • Off- street access for 1-ton chlorine container and other chemical deliveries is provided; • Maximum sound attenuation is provided within the solid grouted masonry block building; and • A fence or wall may not be necessary around the entire site since all project components are in-doors. This provides ample landscaping zones, saves the large eucalyptus tree(s) and would allow for more architectural and landscaping options. The building will be designed of solid grouted masonry block or other materials for maximum sound attenuation. Additional sound absorbing paneling can be mounted inside the engine room if required to meet the noise criteria established during the environmental phase of the work. Noise escaping through the ventilation system will be reduced to acceptable levels through ducting with a specially designed configuration or through sound attenuating duct silencers. The engine will be internally cooled through utilization of an in-lineheat exchanger(Freeflow Products). The jacket coolant from the engine circulates through the heat exchanger which is in-line with the pump discharge piping. The heat transfers directly to the potable water as it flows through the heat exchanger into the distribution system. The ventilation system in the A-2 NOTE SETBACK VARIANCES WILL BE REQUIRED SOURCE McDONNELL CENTER BUSINESS PARK / SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 / I ,yd o I. Oo�`c. 3 JAG 1 A E paP o � N o I ID ;r C TO RANCH ROAD J N40a24'05'W r w rn _ 9 WELL SITE BOUNDARY 0 / o 0 (o , 0 0 0 ¢ r 0 d M CITY OF HUIMNGTON BEACH EXHIBIT d r1 Robert Bein,William Frost & Associates / ROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS.P!ANNERS k SURVEYORS SPECIFIC PLAN SETBACK REQUIRMENTS 1 P.op.9Ci 5)05) I-M LLiO,P4Arai•IR4➢F CALOU—9351¢7057 =" = AC PAVEMENT / PROPERTY LINE I' �.— LANDSCAPE AREA EXIST. EUCALYPTUS TREES a*114,., 000 .—�4- FLUCR10ATION Room m7 < rnl -? AMI®11I,A1j"#.'Q I E 9t /r MTpR130M zy onteu, eet 1� `• ��' f //� /�/�` '' `�' FLOW METER VAULT 20' ROAD AND SOT' WELL ROOM a- UTILITY EASEMENT ROM STATIC MIXER VAULT CHLORK ROOM I uj —/Z C"Io p o pe�9ieT / .$�'3• ��$ •rrti c m tp * Tx, / -Fw ENGINE ROOM �A,; ¢;�� ,— -- ————————————— ——————————————————— U EL TO RANCHO STREET aCr Zw �U o3u us o`3 30� a- EXISTING BLOCK WALL c� 3 RAIL ROAD EASEMENT a to 0 o RESIDENTIAL HOMES 0 i a r- CL a M CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXHIBIT Robert Bein,William Frost & Associates % PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS.PLANNERS&SURVEYORS WELL 12 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 2 P.O.90a 57057 14125 ALTO.PARK—•1-1E.CN.SORMIA 9209-7052 +: i (9w1•22-ssas i D SPLIT-FACE "FLUTED" CONCRETE MASONRY EXTERIOR WALLS -46 - - MONORAIL BEAM TO EXTEND THRU DOOR FOR LOADING OF v y CHLORINE CYLINDERS a a u n O c O N O p REMOVABLE WALL AND ROOF 0 OVER WELL HEAD In J VIEW FROM ASTRONAUTICS DR. 00 ` L7 3 0 to o 0 0 0 0 i a a 0 o_ M CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH EXHIBIT 2 B Robert Bein,William Frost & Associates WELL NO 12 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. PLANNERS&SURVEYORS PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION 3 T P.O.9o.STC5) 14M µTOM PMKW.T.i9NNE C/.uT A 92.19-1951 j 0.91.12_}5C5 CONCEPTUAL EXTERIOR STUDY PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO.1119) engine room will be specially designed todissipate the heat which is generated from the engine and the exhaust system. Air will be drawn from the engine room through a exhaust fan and out through a concrete or specially insulated chamber which will house the emission controller (catalytic converter)and engine muffler. ' C. Plan Processing and Permits It is anticipated that the plans will need to be processed through the following agencies. 1. Department of Health Services (DHS). The California Health and Safety Code, Section 4019 requires that an amended water supply permit be obtained from the DHS before developing a new well. RBF will assist the City in obtaining this amended permit. The permit package may include the following elements: • Completed application form • Well Logs • Well Construction Report • Plot Plan with Potential Contaminants Shown • Copy of Notice of Determination from CEQA documentation • Emergency Chlorination Plan It is anticipated that the Drinking Water Source Assessment Program will be completed by the Orange County Water District and is not within the scope of this proposal. The well will be designed in accordance with AWWA standards and in accordance with Bulletin 74-81 "Water Well Standards: State of California"and Bulletin 74-90"California Well Standards. 2. South Coast Air Quality Management District(AQMD). The AQMD requires an installation and operation permit. Elements of this permitting process include the completion of an application form (Form 400A and 400-E-13) and submission of a fee. Best Available Control Technology(BACT) is required for Internal Combustion Engines. Inspection by AQMD and performance tests may be required prior to issuing a Permit to Operate. BACT criteria which will be met includes 1) A three-way catalyst on the engine exhaust system 2)VOC of 0.15 g/bhp-hr 3)NOX of 0.15 g/bhp-hr and 4)CO of 0.60 g/bhp-hr 3. City of Huntington Beach Department of Building and Safety. The plans will be submitted to this City department for review in order to obtain a building permit. The building will be designed to the latest UBC and UFC and City codes. Other permits such as an Electrical Permit and a Mechanical Permit will be applied for if required. 4. City of Huntington Beach Planning Department. The plans will be submitted to this City . department for site plan review and approval only. Based upon a conversation with the Planning Department, a full design review board submittal will not be required. 5. City of Huntington Beach Fire Department. The project plans including the LPG and chemical systems will be submitted to this City department for their review and approval. Early coordination with the Fire Department plan checkers will identify the design criteria in order to facilitate plan review. A-3 i PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT No.1119) 6. City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department. The project plans will be submitted to this City department for review and approval by the Public Works Commission. D. Value En ineering. RBF's highly qualified and experienced technical staff will provide value engineering services ! by utilizing the following procedures. • Identifying the project budget as determined by City forces • Channeling the preliminary design effort to meet this budget • Preparing a preliminary cost estimate to submit with the preliminary design letter report i E. Power and Control System { 1. Power The power design on this project is relatively straightforward due to the low power requirements of the station. RBF will contact SCE early-in the design to notify them of she project and begin utility coordination. At a point in design where power requirements are firmly established and a basic site plan and single line are complete,applicable information will ibe transmitted to SCE for final utility coordination. 2. Controls i, The controls design requires a careful integration ofthe engine,pump and valves,chemical,and SCADA systems; all of which have unique characteristics. I RBF will meet with the City at the beginning of controls design to obtain information on the City's SCADA system and discuss control and SCADA philosophy. A general operations summary will be prepared which clarifies the important elements of the proposed station controls design which will be submitted to the City for approval. The control design will interface between the Murphy Engineer Controller,the pump control and waste valves,and the chemical treatment systems. The control and monitoring aspects of the SCADA system will be implemented based on the SCADA system capability and agreed functioning with the City. . The SCADA system for this project will include a RTU and radio to communicate with the City's master controller. The design will include a telephone service as back up for SCADA control. These key issues have been further developed into a scope of work in the following pages. 3. Scope of Work RBF proposes to complete this project in three phases. Phase I is thePreliminary Engineering and Planning Phase where all critical issues will be identified and addressed in a preliminary design letter report(PDLR) which will be prepared for approval by the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Once the PDLR is approved, Phase 11 of the project,designated the Final Design Phase will begin. During Phase I1, : final contract documents including plans, specifications and estimates of construction costs would be completed. Phase III is the Construction Phase during which RBF will provide Bid Evaluation services and other specific Construction Administration services. A-4 k PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT No.1119) i Phase I: Preliminary Engineering and Planning During this phase of work RBF, in partnership with the City's Engineering and Water Operations Staff,will complete the following tasks. Task 1.1 Data Collection. All existing data, surveys, reports, logs, water quality tests, and 1, analyses on the well will be gathered. Utility research will be completed and existing street plans and other available engineering plans will be obtained. r Task 1.2 Topographical Survey. The City has provided a survey in the RFP package. A more detailed survey of the site is needed,however,in order to design the interface between the proposed improvements and the existing edge of pavement in I Astronautics Drive. RBF surveyors will complete this effort in one day with a two person team. Task 1.3 Geotechnical Investigation. A soils investigation will be developed for the site which will include the following components. 1)Literature Review 2)Subsurface exploration including two borings to evaluate liquefaction potential 3)Laboratory Testing including in-situ moisture,expansion index,consolidation,R-Value,shear strength, and soil corrosivity 4) Preparation of report evaluating site suitability, geologic hazards, groundwater conditions, excavation characteristics of-on-site 1 material,compaction requirements,foundation design parameters,bearing capacity and settlement potential. 1 Task 1.4 Environmental Analysis Task 1.4.1 Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Form/Discussion of Environmental Evaluation The Initial Study will contain a description of the project, alternatives, the project location,and a description of the environmental setting of the proposed Project site. The main body of the document will consist of a Client-approved.environmental checklist and an accompanying environmental analysis including detailed explanations of all answers to the checklist questions. The potential environmental impact areas to be examined include construction-related impacts(including dust, noise and access/detour issues), geology and soils, air quality, noise, land use (compatibility issues with adjacent land uses, and consistency with the adopted Specific Plan),-traffic/access, public services, aesthetics, and public safety. RBF will utilize existing information and on-site reconnaissance reviews to assess Project impacts on the environment. RBF will prepare the environmental analysis based primarily upon the existing technical studies,design plans and otherrelevant documentation available,including engineering studies prepared under separate tasks. A quantitative noise and air quality assessment will be prepared as part of the checklist responses. The noise assessment will identify construction-related noise and potential noise impacts of project-related traffic on existing residences. Preliminary noise mitigation recommendations will be made (detailed modeling of sound attenuation A-5 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT No.1119) requirements,if necessary,could be provided under a separate scope of work). The air quality assessment will quantify construction-related emissions and operational emissions in accordance with SCAQMD methodology. Task 1.4.2 Draft and Final Negative Declaration i RBF will respond to one complete set of Client comments on the Screencheck IS/MND, and will resubmit the IS/MND for Client review/approval prior to distribution. RBF will prepare a reproducible original(hard copy and electronic) for Client use/distribution. Task 1.4.3 Meetinas l RBF environmental staff will attend one staff meeting. Additional meetings can be I provided on a time and materials basis. i . Task 1.5 Pump and Engine Design. Based upon the data provided by the City, information gathered,and our engineeringjudgmerytthe pump hydraulics and engine design will be completed. Pump and engine comp I ents that the City has successfully used on other wells will be incorporated into the design. ti Task 1.6 Chemical Systems. In this phase of work all the chemical equipment will be identified and sized. The type of chemical feed systems will be as outlined in the RFP which include the dual one ton elemental chlorine containers with TGO Chlortainers,Ammonium Hydroxide and Hydro Fluorosilicic.Acid storage and feed equipment. Task 1.7 Value Engineering. A value engineering team will review the preliminary design to develop the most feasible methods of meeting the City's objectives and expectations for this project and providing a design which fits within the City's budget. A preliminary construction cost analysis will be prepared. Task 1.8 Landscape and Irrigation. I Task 1.8.1 Landscape Concept Plan. RBF shall prepare one landscape concept plan for the project site at an appropriate scale. The project will be designed based on Client goals and objectives, site opportunities and constraints, the McDonnell Centre Business Park Specific Plan No. 11,and the requirements of the City of Huntington Beach.The plans shall include plans,sections and elevations as necessary to convey ( the landscape design concept.The plan and a preliminary estimate of construction l costs will be submitted to the Client and the site review committee for review, comment and approval. Task 1.9 Preliminary Design Letter Report. A report prepared in letter format will be compiled which will include: 1 Documentation of all design decisions made during preliminary design A-6 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO.1119) Pump, engine,and chemical system design parameters • Identification of all major equipment ( Architectural renderings, preliminary site plan and building floor plan Preliminary cost estimate • Development of the project general operations • Listing of inputs and outputs. Task 1.10 Coordination and Meetings. RBF will provide coordination with the City staff and other agencies as required to complete the project. RBF staff will attend up to three meetings during the preliminary design phase of the work. Phase II: Final Design After approval of the PDLR, RBF will prepare final bid ready Contract Documents. These documents will include plans,specifications and a final construction cost estimate. RBF will submit plans to the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department for two official plan checks at the 60%and 90% levels. Once the 90%plan check comments have been addressed,RBF will submit the final,bid ready, 100%plans and specifications to the City for signatures. A single submittal to each of the other agencies will be accomplished at the 90%complete level. I 1 Task 2.1 Project Drawings. It is anticipated that the following plan sheets are required for this project: 4 General G-1 Title Sheet G-2 General Notes,Vicinity Map, Legend,etc. Civil C-1 Site and Grading Plan and Details C-2 Piping Profile and Details C-3 Civil Details Mechanical M-1 Material List and Details M-2 Well Piping Plan and Details M-3 Well Section and Details M-4 Engine Plan, Sections and Details M-5 Chlorine Plan and Details M-6 Chemical Plan and Details M-7 Ventilation Plan and Details M-8 Fuel System and LPG Plan and Details I M-9 Mechanical and Chemical Details M-10 Mechanical and Chemical Details Architectural A-1 Architectural Floor Plan and Details A-2 Reflected Ceiling Plan and Details A-3 Architectural Roof Plan and Details { A-4 Exterior Elevations and Details A-5 Exterior Elevations and Details i i A-7 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT No.1119) I A-6 Door and Interior Finish Schedules A-7 Architectural Details Structural S-1 General Structural Notes and Typical Details S-2 Foundation Plan and Details S-3 Roof Framing Plan and Details S-4 Building Sections and Structural Details S-5 Structural Details S-6 Structural Details Landscape L-1 Planting Plan J L-2 Irrigation Plan L-3 Irrigation Details Electrical E-1 Index,Notes, Legends, Symbols,Abbreviations E-2 Single Line Diagrams and Details E-3 Site Plan i E-4 Power and Instrument Plan E-5 Lighting Plan E-6 Engine Control Interconnect Diagram E-7 SCADA Interconnect Diagram i E-8 Chemical Systems Connection Diagram Task 2.2 Contract Documents and Specifications. Contract documents will be prepared at the 90%and 100%level which includes the front end documents provided with the RFP and modified for this project and the technical portions of the specifications prepared in CSI format. The contract documents will be prepared in Word format. I Task 2.3 Construction Cost Estimate. The probable cost of construction will be determined for the 90%submittal and updated for the final 100% submittal. I Task 2.4 Plan Processing and Administration. Coordination will be provided during the early stages of the project development to determine all agency requirements. The plans will then be submitted to at least six separate departments and agencies at the 90% level to obtain the required approvals. Phase III: Construction RBF will provide the Bidding and Construction Administration services requested in the RFP as described below. Task 3.1 Bid Evaluation. RBF will provide an evaluation of the bids received by the City I which will entail an analysis ofthe bid documents,verification of license status,and contacting the low bidder's references. The results of the evaluation will be documented in a letter to the City and a recommendation for award made. V--Task 3.2 Construction Support. The following services will be provided during the construction phase of the work. A-8 j PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT No.1119) Task 3.21. Submittal Review. For a project of this magnitude it is anticipated that there will be up to 30 submittals to review. Effort required beyond the amount indicated on in the fee table will be on a time and material basis. Task.3.2.2 Requests for Information. RBF will provide clarification for up to four RFPs. Effort required beyond these four RFP.s will be on a time and material basis. - Task 3.2.3 Change Orders. RBF will provide evaluation and recommendations for up to two change orders. Effort required beyond this will be on a time and material basis. { Task 3.2.4 Field Reviews. RBF will visit the site twice during construction to review the progress of the work. RBF will also attend the final project inspection or"walk-through"and assist the City in preparing a`.`punch list." Additional Services i The additional services will be provided as requested in the RFP by taking the final plans and specifications for the Well 12 project and removing site specific information. i Tasks Excluded From Scope of Work 1 1. Environmental Noticing/Distribution. i 2. Preparation of Written Responses to Public Comments 3. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4. Traffic Control Plans 5. Permit Fees and Application Fees G. Bid Advertisement or Addendum Services 7. Attendance of Pre-Bid or Bid Opening Meetings 8. Attendance of Pre-Construction Meeting or Periodic Construction Meetings 9. Attendance of Project Testing and Start-up Procedures * Please note that these services can be provided by highly qualified personnel at a fee negotiated when the work is required. i A-9 i 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 [Oil SECTION B PROJECT SCHED water Well No. 12,Pump and Facilities Installation 1 02'00 03'00 1 04 02'01 Task I.IT&*Name Duration I start I r.iSh_ Mar'DO I Apr'00 I may UU I h,.'Do I Jul00 NOTICE TO PROCEED days 0&'21/00 oa,21/00 0321 PHASE 1: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 54 days 3F21/00 06/02/DO Meeting 0 days 0324/00 0324100 4 2 Data Collection 14 days 03.124.'00 04/12= 3 Top.91,111i0a)Sl"'Y 14 days 0S28`00 04114/00 4 Gectechnical Investigation 21 days 03128M 04/25= 5 Fltvbonrnterdat Anaysis 30 day. 04/04100 05/15= 6 Prehntctary Design 40 days =21= 05mrl)() Submit Pirelinin;riberugn Letter Report 0 days aslisiao 8 4 days 05/1N00 W021DO PHASE 11: FINAL DESIGN 79 days 66105100 09/2I/00 9 preparation of Final Construction Plans 30 days ow5"00 07f1 4/W 10 Subr-ft 609.CorratnCt—Plants 0 days 07/14= 07/14= 114 11 City R—hr.PWf-d 5 days 07/17100 07/21/130 12 City Rolm 60%Submittal to R5F --0 days 07121/01) 07/21MO 21 Revise Plats 07r2A= 081181DO 2-0days 13 submit 90%Construction Plans specifications a Cost Estimate 0 days 08118M 0am afDO 14-- '--- CayR-Twlo.;i- Scimys Oaji/W 0E251W _RBF 0 days =25= DEWS= --li---Revise—plammd—Specif—cations— 14days DW14/00 Ow2ilDE 17 Final submittal of 100%Plans&SPecklicattlom&Cost ESUrnatO 0 days 0921100 0921/00 *-Q1 121 PHASE III: BID EVALUATION/CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT 243 days 10111111010 D91117101 MV I 18 Beg.Advafisernent 0 days 10flim 110111100 19 6p-Bids 0 days 11109000 11/09100 11/09 20 Bid Evaluation 7 days 11/10W 11/20/00 I s—s1wN o I i—ce I o Proceed— 0 days- —1 W 7—= 1-12—7/0-0 11f27 22 Rwise,—Sub.Win,ls 90 days 11/28100 04/02,01 --i3-- Respond to FIF(I 210 days 11/28100 09/17/01 24 [-valuate&mm,o 0,cem 210 days 11/28w 09/17/01 IV Field Vd No 25 0 days 0112 6 01r29,01 07179-- 26 Field Visil No.2 0 days 04/23101 0423/01 0623 27 Final Field Construction Review 0 day. 0911CVDI 09/10101 OW10 Project:Water WOO No.12.Furnio arid Facildies Installation Task Milestone ♦ Phase Summary IPMMMMMW City Task F,.;Ki S—.-y Chant: City of Hurdirtgton,Beach (10%4 Schedulenipp Robert Bein,William Frost&Associates Page B-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ffi � SECTION C TEAM ORGANIZATION 1 1 1 1 1 I PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO. 11 19) Section C Team Organization 1. Key Personnel The team members selected for this project are specialized in the analysis and design of water wells. Our Project Team will provide the City of Huntington Beach with comprehensive services in all disciplines required for successful completion. The following descriptions briefly highlight key personnel,project roles, experience and qualifications. i Education: Michael P.Rudinica,P.E., Executive Vice President •M.S.Sanitary Engineering,Loyola Project Team Role: Principal-In-Charge Marymount University •B.S. Civil Engineering,Loyola Marymount University Michael Rudinica is a registered Civil Engineer with over 21 years of experience in all aspects of water resources engineering. Mr. Registration: Rudinica supervises the water and wastewater engineering • Civil Engineer(CA)No. 32135 planning, design and construction management services for the Professional Affiliations: Company. He has served as Principal-in-Charge or in a key • Water Pollution Control Association technical capacity on projects in the western United States and • American Water Works Association internationally. Services have included comprehensive master I • San Diego County Water Works Group planning and engineering design for complex water, sewer, and • Orange County Water Association• Water Environment Federation reclaimed water systems. In addition,Mr.Rudinica has been at the • Urban Land Institute forefront of leading-edge technology for water and wastewater treatment facilities. Mr. Rudinica has extensive experience in analysis and design of water wells; current projects include water well designs for the cities of Norwalk, Arcadia and Sierra Madre; and well remediation projects at CRC Norco. Education: Lawrence E. Gallery,P.E.,Vice President • B.S. Civil Engineering, California State Project Team Role: Project Manager University,Los Angeles Registration: Mr. Gallery is a Registered Civil Engineer with over 22 years of • Civil Engineer(CA),No. 2 78 70 experience in water resources engineering.He has been responsible for the preparation of several plans of work, engineering reports, Professional Affiliations:•American Society of Civil Engineers and designs, including preparation of plans and specifications and •American Water Works Association construction administration for major water and wastewater • Orange County Water Association projects. Mr. Gallery serves as Department Head of the Major • National Engineering Honor Fraternity Project Study and Design Division of the Water Resources of Chi Epsilon Department and has been integrally involved in the design of over 40 well and pump station facilities. Mr.Gallery is currently serving as Project Manager for all projects at CRC.Norco including well remediation. C-1 1 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO. 1 1 19) r Education: C.Stephen Bucknam,P.E. (Bucknam & Associates) •M.S.,Environmental Engineering, Project Team Role: Quality Control/Value Engineering Loyola University of Los Angeles • B.S., Civil Engineering,Loyola University of Los Angeles Mr.Bucknam is a Registered Civil Engineer with over 31 years of experience in water and wastewater and program management Registration: disciplines. Water and,wastewater experience includes planning, { • Civil Engineer(CA)No.20903 design and construction management of water and wastewater projects,including:hydraulic network modeling of water and sewer systems, program management, master planning, environmental studies, water and sewer system design, rate studies, emergency planning, facilities design, groundwater studies,wells, reservoirs, fsite studies, pump stations, lift stations, intergovernmental negotiations and agreements, hydrology, treatment facilities, building design, grants, regulatory permitting, system appraisals, R/W/ negotiations, acquisitions and documentation, production control,operations studies,capital improvement programming and budgeting,hydroelectric projects,underground utilities,assessment districts, surveying, mapping, legal testimony to public boards, commissions and councils, and direction of technical advisory committees to joint powers agencies and water districts. He is f currently providing engineering services to RBF on the U.S.Army f Corps of Engineers projects for the cities of Norwalk,Arcadia and Sierra Madre. f Education: Steven R. Speakman,P.E.,Senior Engineer,Water Resources • B.S. Civil Engineering, California Project Team Role: Alternate Project Manager/Engineer Polytechnic University,Pomona (Environmental Engineering Option) Steve Speakman has over 11 years of experience in water and Registration: wastewater engineering. He has expertise in water and sewer ' Civil Engineer(CA)No.51185 master planning,design of water and sewer pumping,distribution, Professional Affiliations: storage, and collection facilities. Mr. Speakman is a Senior • Member,American Water Works Engineer with the company and has served as Project Manager or Association Project Engineer on several municipal water pumping and storage • Member, California Water projects; he is currently serving as Project Manager on the U.S. Environmental Association Army Corps of Engineers project in Norwalk, which includes. design of a 2,000 gpm water well,a dual zone pump station and a 3.2 MG reservoir. Education: John Nagle,P.E.,Senior Engineer,Water Resources • M.S.Environmental Engineering, Project Team Role: Project Engineer Loyola Marymount University • B.S. Civil Engineering,Loyola Marymount University John Nagle is a registered Civil Engineer in the State of California with over 11 years of experience in the field of water and Registration: wastewater systems,engineering master planning,modeling,design • Civil Engineer(CA)No. 46972 and financing. Mr. Nagle has prepared numerous master plans, Professional Affiliations: plans of work, capital improvement programs, engineering •American Society of Civil Engineers feasibility studies, rate studies and bond issue allocation studies, C-2 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT No. 11 19) •American Water Works Association and has provided design engineering services for complex water • Orange County Water Association resources projects. Mr. Nagle is,currently serving as Project manager on the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers project in the cities of Arcadia and Sierra Madre which includes design of a 2,000 gpm ( water well. Education: Bruce D. Cooke,P.E.,Senior Electrical Engineer • B.S.Electrical Engineering, University Project Team Role: Electrical Engineer of California,Santa Barbara Registration: Mr. Cooke has over 25 years of electrical engineering experience. • Electrical Engineer(CA)No. 12993 He has been responsible for electrical design packages covering control systems(SCADA),telemetry,instrumentation,switchgear, Professional ElectAffilrical l a motor control centers, power generation; efficiency studies, and • Institute ojElectrical and Electronic Engineers other applicable studies. Mr. Cooke has extensive experience in providing electrical design for water resources projects; current projects include U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects for the cities of Norwalk,Arcadia and Sierra Madre; and projects at CRC. Norco. I Education: Paul R.Young,S.E.,Vice President,Structural Engineering l • M.S. Civil Engineering, California State Project Team Role: Structural Engineer University,Long Beach • B.S. Civil Engineering, California State University,Long Beach Mr.Young has over 19 years of professional structural engineering experience and a broad background in the analysis, design, and Registration: construction support for water and wastewater projects. Mr. • Civil Engineer(CA)No.35714 Young's experience in water resource and control facilities includes •Structural Engineer(CA)No. 3000 the design of pipeline and drainage structures, well and pump Professional Affiliations: station buildings, large pumping forebay reservoirs, buried •Structural Engineers Association of reservoirs, cooling water inlet structures, reinforced concrete Southern California channels,and gas turbine generator foundations for dynamic loads. •American Society of Civil Engineers I Education: Mike Miller,P.L.S.,Vice President,Survey • B.A. English Literature, California Project Team Role: Survey State University, Fullerton •Survey Studies Mike Miller is a registered Land Surveyor in the State of California Registration: with over 27 years of experience. At RBF,Mr.Miller manages the • Land Surveyor(CA)No. 5747 daily operations of survey field crews,prepares contract documents, oversees safety meetings,and office data processing services. He Professional Affiliations: is responsible for all operational elements of Survey Engineering, • Member, California Land Surveyors CADD Data Processing, client coordination, estimates, and Association proposal preparation. He maintains a working knowledge of field •Member, Cal fornia Council of Civil conditions,electronic office and field instrumentation,and survey Engineers and Land Surveyors crew operations. Mr. Miller has been responsible for hundreds of land surveying,construction staking,topographic,and aerial survey projects. C-3 �I PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CiTY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO. 1119) Education: Kevin Thomas,REA,CEI, Environmental Services Manager •B.A.Environmental Engineering, Project Team Role: Environmental University of California,Los Angeles Registration: Kevin Thomas is a Registered Environmental Assessor and Registered Environmental Assessor Certified Environmental Inspector with the State of California with (CA)No. 03634 over 15 years of experience. As Environmental Services Manager, • Certified Environmental Inspector(CA) he oversees and prepares Environmental and Planning studies for No. 12317 public and private sectors clients, under the California i Professional Affiliations: Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental •Association of Environmental Policy Act(NEPA). Mr Thomas'responsibilities also include staff Professionals training, public hearing presentations, and coordination of our •American Planning Association •National Association of Environmental extensive in-house team of experts as well as various Professionals for Impact Assessment subcontractors. Kevin draws on his broad background and • International Association for Impact understanding of environmental constraints to provide technical and Assessment CEQA compliance, review and environmental documentation, in addition to research, analysis,and writing. Education: Roy Herbold,AIA,Architect • B.S.Environmental Design, California Project Team Role: Architecture State Polytechnic University,Pomona Registration: Roy Herbold has over 20 years of experience in design of water • Registered Architect(CA) 1980 resources facilities structure. Mr. Herbold has acted as Project f Architect for numerous water.resources projects with RBF.He has f Professional Affiliations: experience preparing need assessments, space planning, •American Institute of Architects • Construction Specification Institute architectural design, preparation of contract documents, interior design, construction observations, client liaison, and computer modeling. One of the keys to Mr. Herbold's successful architectural designs is his ability to blend a building into its existing surroundings; his broad range of styles and diverse background allows him to maintain the architectural integrity of a project area. i Education: John Andrew,RLA,Landscape Architect • B.S.Landscape Architecture Project Team Role: Landscape Architect Registration: • Landscape Architect(CA)No. 3152 John Andrew is a Licensed Landscape Architect in the State of California with over ten years of experience. Mr. Andrew has extensive experience in landscape architectural projects involving landscape master planning, preparation of conceptual design and landscape plans, specifications, and estimates. He has served as staff Landscape Architect on numerous water resources projects that have included wells, pumping stations and reservoirs. C-4 I PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO. 1119) i Education: Daniel Chu,G.E. (Ninyo& Moore) • M.S., Geotechnical Engineering, Utah Project Team Role: Geotechnical Engineer I State University,Logan, Utah • B.S., Civil Engineering,National Central University, Chungli Taiwan Mr. Chu has over 20 years of experience in geotechnical engineering. As Chief Geotechnical Engineer at Ninyo&.Moore Registration: he conducts.geotechnical investigations and analysis;prepares and • Geotechnical Engineer(CA)No. 2096 reviews geotechnical reports; prepares and reviews project plans • Civil Engineer(CA)No.37991 and specifications; provides technical support to engineers, technicians, and construction personnel; reviews soil and foundation reports and provided third-party review for city j agencies; and coordination engineering research.and development activities. 2. Organizational Chart An organizational chart is included at the end ofthis section depicting key personnel.and role on the project. In addition to team members described in this Section,over 500 professionals are available to support the efforts of our Project Team. RBF's multi-disciplinary capabilities include expertise in over 90 specific fields. I I C-5 Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation City of Huntington Beach Organizational Chart 'Principal-in=ChatgJ Key StRff Michael Pr:Rudinica;:. Quality Controll: Value Engineering C.Stephen Bucknam,P.E.(1) Alternate Project Manager Project Manager Lawrence E.Gallery,P.E. Steve Speakman,P.E. Project Engineers/ Permitting Electrical Engineer Structural Engineer Survey Steve Speakman,P.E. Bruce D.Cooke,P.E. Paul Young,S.E. Mike Miller,P.L.S. John Nagle,P.E. Environmental Architect Landscape Architect Geotechnical Engineer Kevin Thomas,REA,CEI Roy Herbo/d,AIA . John Andrew;RLA Daniel.Chu,G.E.(2) Over 500 Technical and Suppoit'Staff Available:;::rZ. Subconsultants: (1) Bucknam&Associates ROBERT BEnv,WiuiAm FRosr&AssocuTEs (2) Ninyo&Moore PROF E 66!ONAL ENGINE ERB.PLANNERS 6 SURVEYORS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SECTION D 1 1 1 1 i 1 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO. 1119) 1 - Section D Consultant's Experience 1. RBF Corporate Overview Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) is a full service consulting firm providing planning, engineering, surveying, and related Ranked in the Top 100 professional services. Established in 1944, RBF has provided quality Engineering Firms in the consulting services for 55 years and is currently ranked in the top 100 Nation by ENR engineering firms in the nation by Engineering News Record(ENR). Our diverse range of professional consulting services includes all facets of civil and water resources engineering; structural engineering; environmental analysis; field surveying; aerial mapping and photogrammetry; global positioning satellite surveying; geographic information systems;computer services;and construction management to both public and private sector clients. With a multi-disciplined technical and support staff of over 500 employees,the RBF team has the experience,organizational resources,management capabilities and in-house computer resources to ensure ( that each project is cost-effective,meets the highest standard of quality,-and is completed on schedule. RBF is a leader in the field of water resources engineering and provides the full range of professional services from analysis concept through design, and construction support services. The firm has proven experience in developing practical and cost-effective solutions to water resources design challenges and provides technical excellence in the planning,financing, design,and construction of water supply, wastewater treatment, and water reclamation facilities. The Water Resources Department utilizes a multi-discipline team approach and Istate-of-the art computer technology to serve the firm's clients. 2. Background and Experience RBF has extensive experience in the design of domestic water wells and has proven ability in providing cost- effective, leading edge solutions to the challenges faced with these types of facilities. The company is currently providing engineering services to the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers for design of wells in the cities of Norwalk, Arcadia and Sierra Madre. We are also currently providing analysis and design engineering services to the State of California for remediation of wells serving the California Rehabilitation Center in Norco. Our comprehensive project experience includes all disciplines and ancillary services requested in the RFQ. Below is a list of representative experience that includes project name, year, client and contact information: Client: Water Well No.11,Downey CA City of Downey Design engineering services for a deep well ; 9252 Stewart&Gray Road pump and variable frequency drive motor, Downey,CA 90241 Mr.Greg Mayfield _ capable of supplying over 4,500 gpm of :•= =`' (562)904-7202 potable water to the City's water distribution system. The project is located in a highly -�- Year: 1995 visuai setting within the Civil Center and Team Members: M.Rudinica,L. directly adjacent to the police station. The y �" Gallery,B.Cooke,P.Young aesthetic appearance of the structure and well facility appurtenances was a major - consideration during planning and design of this project. The architecture was designed to match the theme of the Civic Center and police station. Also, during drilling of the well and construction of the facility,extensive noise mitigation D-1 i PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL No. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT No. 1119) measures were implemented in order to minimize disruptions to the City work i force. RBF also prepared the environmental documentation and landscape plans for the project. j Client: Roll Pump Station,San Diego,CA _ Otay Water District RBF is currently providing �m 2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard final design engineering for the Spring Valley,CA 91977 Mr.Mitch Young Roll Pump Station Project. Ny�` (619)670-2245 RBF also provided preliminary •`��-�� engineering for the facility which was designed for an ultimate capacity Year: 1999/2000(final Design) exceeding 31 cfs with a connected load of over 1,750 horsepower,and has the capability to boost flow from two different suction sources to any one of three Team Members: points of discharge. The facility design also includes recirculation and L.Gallery,B.Cooke,P.Young disinfection capabilities for the adjacent 35 million gallons of stored domestic water. The project required balancing hydraulic conditions in order to 1 maximize operation of the same pumps for each of the alternative pumping scenarios. Project Highlights: • Three Natural Gas Engine Driven Pumps • Two Electric Motor Driven Pumps • Three Horizontal Recirculation Pumps • Chlorination/Ammoniation System • 1,000 KW Standby Generator a Masonry Block Building i Client: Lakeside Pump Station,Orange County,CA Santa Margarita Water District Comprehensive design and construction 1 26111 Antonio Parkway management services for the Lakeside Pump ' Las Flores,CA 92788 Station. This facility was designed for an ultimate ~ Mr.Dan Ferons (949)459-6400 pumping capacity of 54 cubic feet per second j (3,250 horsepower) and also includes a 270,000 j Year: 1992 gallon reinforced concrete operating forebay. The initial installation included three natural gas Team Members: driven pumping units with an LPG standby L.Gallery,B.Cooke,P.Young energy source. Five additional pumps included electric motor driven units, providing dual power source capabilities for reliability. Fully automatic controls and telemetry were designed and housed within the masonry block building. Client: St.Joseph Well Site No.2,U.S.Army Corps of Engineers U.S.Army Corps of Engineers RBF is currently providing final design engineering for a 2,000 gpm water 911 Wilshire Boulevard well,as part of services (under contract with the USACOE)for the Cities of Los Angeles,CA 90017 Arcadia and Sierra Madre Water Infrastructure Restoration Projects. RBF also Mr.Jan Kwiecinski(213)452-3805 provided the initial study and preliminary design. Mr.Steve Bucknam(714)850-9310 '. Year: 1999/2000 Team'Members: M.Rudinica,L.Gallery,J. Nagle,B. Cooke,S.Bucknam D-2 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUhIP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO. 1119) Client: Norwalk Water System Improvements(including new well design), U.S.Army Corps of Engineers U.S.Army Corps of Engineers 911 Wilshire Boulevard RBF, under contract with the USACOE, is currently providing final design Los Angeles,CA 90017 engineering services for a new 2,000 gpm water well, including water Mr.Jan Kwiecinski(213)452-3805 Mr.Steve Buckram(714)850-9310 treatment(ammonia and chlorine)for the City of Norwalk. Year: 1999/2000 Team Members: M.Rudinica,L.Gallery,S. Speakman,B.Cooke,S.Bucknam Client: Nichols Well,Treatment and Chlorination Santa Margarita Water District Facilities,Orange County,CA 26111 Antonio Parkway RBF provided preliminary and final design Las Flores,CA 92688 engineering services for the well and `. Mr.Dan Ferons (949)459-6590 chlorination facilities. These facilities provide chlorination of domestic water supply systems Year: 1993 to meet State Department of Health Services ¢ Surface Water Treatment Regulations and _ _ -k4 ..,-. Team Members: Disinfection of treated effluent to be utilized as a Nichols Well,Treatment and L.Gallery,J.Nagle,B.Cooke source of landscape irrigation. These Chlorination Facilities, installations include leak detection,containment, Orange County,CA and treatment facilities utilizing state-of-the-art equipment. The chlorination facilities meet requirements of the Uniform Fire Code,California Code of Regulations,South Coast Air Quality Management District,and the State Department of Health r Services. Client: Rancho Wells,Riverside County,CA Rancho California Water District Design engineering and construction 42135 Winchester Road management for Well Nos. 132, 133, 138.and Temecula,CA 92590 139 ranging in capacity from 1,570 gpm to Mr. Bob Lemons (909)676-4101 2,250 gpm. Each of these facilities required j coordination with adjacent developers to. Year: 1993 integrate facilities and discharge pipeline into proposed developments. Pump to waste Team Members: discharge outlets were also a key design element of these projects. RBF M.Rudinica,L.Gallery coordinated with the hydrogeologist on the well casing designs and evaluation of the test pump data. Two projects required flood plain analysis. Each of the wells included chlorination facilities, complete instrumentation and control features,and integration of telemetry into existing system. CUent: Norma Marshall Pump Station,Temecula,CA Rancho California Water District Design engineering services including plans, 42135 Winchester Road a`= specifications, and estimates for this 12,500 gpm Temecula,CA 92590 pump station equipped with a natural gas Mr. Bob Lemons generator and LPG backup. The unique steel tube (909)676-4101 truss roof system allowed easy access for removal of Year: 1995 pumps for maintenance. Team Members: M.Rudinica,L.Gallery,P.Young D-3 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL No. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT NO. 1119) t Client: Well No.33,Santa Ana,CA City of Santa Ana RBF provided preliminary and final design 1 217 North Main Street engineering services to the City of Santa Ana for 1 Santa Ana CA 92701 Well No. 33 that consisted of plans and (714)647-S�100 specifications for a. 3,000 gpm well =facility; ( Year: 1990 electric motor, total connected load = 400 hp, A—iii l and chlorination equipment.telemetry. The well Team Members: is located within an existing residential tract, and ` ' M.Rudinica,B.Cooke,P.Young the buildings's architectural design as well as noise 1! mitigation were key features incorporated into the overall design. The building was designed to blend into the community as well as provide ease of maintenance and access to City crews. The well facility was well received by the residents and has proved to be easy to maintain by City Staff. I Client: -Engineering Services for California Rehabilitation Center,Norco State of California State of California,Dept.of General Services Project Management Branch RBF is currently providing engineering Sac services to the State of California, I R.Street,Suite Sacramento,CA 95814 14 Department of General Services for projects located at CRC Norco. As part of services provided for the Water Engineering Report and Master Plan,RBF Mr.Dennis Wehsels (916)445-3205 reviewed hydraulic performance, water quality, and operational history for ( Year: 1999 CRC Well Nos 1,2A,3A,4 and 5,and adjacent City of Norco Well Nos.2, 1 12,and 13,and is presently providing design for well remediation. Team Members: M.Rudinica,L.Gallery,B.Cooke, ( K.Thomas Client: Well Modification Projects,Redlands,CA City of Redlands Preliminary and final design engineering services including plans, 1, 35 Cajon Street,Suite 15A specifications, and estimates for modifications to five wells for the City of Redlands,CA 92373 Redlands. Services included: hydraulic analysis, replacement of pumps, Mr.Tom Fujiwara Mr.Tom Fuji 8 replacement of gas engines with electric motors,telemetry,emergency backup Igenerators,piping modifications,and replacement of 2300-V equipment with Year. 1999 480-V equipment. Team Members: M.Rudinica,L.Gallery,B.Cooke Client: Well No.78,Orange County,CA Irvine Ranch Water District Design engineering services including preparation of plans and 15600 Sand Canyon Avenue specifications for equipping this 2,270 gpm well facility with a submersible Irvine,CA 92718 pump and motor. Total connected load=300 HP. Mr. Steve Malloy (949)453-5570 Year: 1996 Team Members: M.Rudinica,L.Gallery,B.Cooke Client: On-Site Sodium Hypochlorite System,Yorba Linda Water District, Yorba Linda Water District Orange County,CA j 4622 Plumosa Drive Design engineering services for on-site sodium hypochlorite system for four Yorba Linda,CA Mr. Ken Vecchiarelli domestic water wells within the District. A disinfection feasibility study and (714)777-3748 disinfection system design for the four well was also provided. The design D-4 ,. PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH(CASH CONTRACT N0. 1119) Year: " 1999 included incorporation of emergency back-up generators. Mr.Speakman was responsible for the completion of a report examining the disinfection Team Members: alternatives available for the four domestic water wells within the District. L.Gallery,S.Speakman The focus of the study was on elemental chlorine, bulk liquid sodium hypochlorite,and on-site generation of dilute sodium hypochlorite. I Client: Antonio Pump Station,Orange County,CA Santa Margarita Water District RBF provided engineering services to the 26111 Antonio Parkway Santa Margarita Water District for design of Las Flores,CA 92688 Mr.Dan Ferons the Antonio Pump Station. The pumps are _•;=:;,.=__ :;�,° :, - i (949)459-6590 used for pumping domestic water from the ':?x:..; water delivery system and Zone II reservoir Year: 1999 storage system to the Santa Margarita Water _ District Zone III reservoirs. The pump station x Team Members: includes six electric motor-driven pumps that _ :��: _ <:.._ _ •, L.Gallery,S.Speakman,B.Cooke provide for a total operating capacity of 30.15 cfs with additional standby capacity. The ,1 standby diesel engine generator provides power for operating two of the largest pumps ,; i in the event of a power outage. The project was completed in two phases with installation of four pumps in Phase I and two additional pumps added in Phase II. Phase II also included facility modifications to operate and ( communicate with the District's SCADA system. IThe project includes an above-grade building with stucco exterior, wood trim, and file mansard roof that houses the pumps, motors, piping, valving, f electrical controls,instrumentation,and appurtenant facilities. This successful project addressed concerns for the project's visual and noise impact on the surrounding community by architecturally blending the style of the pump station building with that of the immediate area and incorporating sound attenuation features in the project's design. ! Client: Vandenberg Air Force Base Project-U.S.Army Corps of Engineers U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Preliminary and final design engineering,including preparation of plans and 1325'T'Street specifications for de-in to the state waterline,Vandenberg AFB. RBF utilized Sacramento, Yi 9as multiple facets of the firm's resources to assemble a design team qualified to (91 A557-is Yiaslas address the hydraulic,mechanical,electrical.and architectural features of the (916j557-6669 project. Year: 1993 Project Highlights: • Tie-in to state water line �. Team Members: M. Rudinica,L.Gallery,B.Cooke Chlorination and fluoridation facilities • 26 cfs booster pump station • 15,000 linear feet of pipeline • 600 linear feet of pipe designed to hang from a bridge at a river crossing D-5 REVISED ESTIMATED HOURS AND FEE WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION (CASH CONTRACT NO. 1119) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Approximate Person-Hours Total Principal Project Project Designer/ Estimated Task Description In Charge Manager Engineer Drafter Fee PHASE I: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND PLANNING 1.1 Data Collection 0 1 2 8 $925 1.2 To o ra hical Survey Lump Sum $1,500 1.3 Geotechnical investigation Lump Sum $7,986 1.4 Environmental Analysis 1.4.1 Initial Study 1 4 14 24 $3,840 1.4.2 Draft and Final Negative Declaration 1 2 4 10 $1,554 1.4.3 Meetings 2 2 1 $514 1.5 Pump and Engine Design 1 4 8 0 $1,428 1.6 Chemical Systems 1 4 8 0 $1,428 1.7 Value En ineerin 1 4 0 0 $644. 1.8 Landscape and Irrigation 1 6 12 20 $3,582 1.9 Preliminary Design Letter Report 8 16 32 48 $10,000 1.10 Coordination and Meetings 1 121 12 8 $3,396 SUBTOTAL PHASE I: 15 55 94 119 $36,797 PHASE II: FINAL DESIGN 2.1 Construction Plans General G-1 Title Sheet 0 0 0 8 $608 G-2 General Notes,Vicinity Map,Legend 1 1 41 8 $1,281 Civil $0 C-1 Site and Grading Plan and Details 1 4 8 32 $3,860 C-2 Piping Profile and Details 1 4 8 32 $3,860 C-3 Civil Details 1 4 8 24 $3,252 Mechanical M-1 Material List and Details 0 2 4 32 $3,066 M-2 Well Piping Plan,and Details 1 4 8 32 $3,860 M-3 Well Section and Details 1 4 8 32 $3,860 M-4 Engine Plan,Sections and Details 1 4 8 32 $3,860 M-5 Chlorine Plan and Details 1 4 8 32 $3,860 M-6 Chemical Plan and Details 1 4 8 32 $3,860 M-7 Ventilation Plan and Details 1 4 8 32 $3,860 M-8 Fuel System and LPG Plan and Details 1 4 81 32 $3,860 M-9 Mechanical and Chemical Details 1 4 8 24 $3,252 M-10 Mechanical and Chemical Details 1 4 8 24 $3,252 Architectural A-1 Architectural Floor Plan and Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 A-2 Reflected Ceiling Plan and Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 A-3 Architectrual Roof Plan and Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 A-4 Exterior Elevations and Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 A-5 Exterior Elevations and Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 A-6 Door and Interior Finish Schedules 1 3 8 16 $2,523 A-7 Architectural Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 Structural S-1 General Structrual Notes and Typical Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 S-2 General Structrual Notes and Typical Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 H:\GRP13\PDATA\10100606\Proposal\FEE_rev.WB2 Page 1 of 2 REVISED ESTIMATED HOURS AND FEE WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION (CASH CONTRACT NO. 1119) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Approximate Person-Hours Total Principal Project Project Designer/ Estimated Task Description In Charge Manager_ Engineer Drafter Fee S-3 General Structrual Notes and Typical Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 S-4 General Structrual Notes and Typical Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 S-5 General Structrual Notes and Typical Details 1 3 8 16 $2,523 S-6 General Structrual Notes and Typical Details 1 3 8 16 S2,523 Landscape L-1 Planting Plan 1 2 4 10 S1,554 L-2 Irrigation Plan 1 2 4 10 S1,554 L-3 Irrigation Details 1 2 4 8 S1,402 Electrical E-1 Index,Notes,Legends,Symbols 1 2 4 14 $1,858 E-2 Single Line Diagram and Details 1 2 4 19 S2,238 E-3 Electrical Site Plan 1 2 4 19 $2,238 E-4 Power and Instrumentation Plan 1 2 4 19 $2,238 E-5 Lighting Plan 1 2 4 19 $2,238 E-6 En ine Control Interconnect Diagram 1 2 4 19 $2,238 E-7 SCADA Interconnect Diagram 1 2 4 19 $2,238 E-8 Chemical Systems Connection Diagram 1 2 4 19 $2,238 Subtotal Task 2.1: 37 112 252 791 $104,284 2.2 Contract Documents and Specifications 4 16 48 12 $8,192 2.3 Construction Cost Estimate 1 4 8 8 $2,036 2.4 Plan Processing and Administration 4 12 24 0 $4,444 SUBTOTAL PHASE If: 46 144 332 811 $118,956 PHASE III: BID EVALUATION AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT 3.1 Bid Evaluation 0 1 6 0 $709 3.2 Construction Services 3.2.1 Submittal Review 30 0 40 100 16 $15,856 3.2.2 Respond to RFIs 25 0 25 125 0 $15,275 3.2.3 Evaluate Change Orders 8 4 10 50 0 $6,750 3.2.4 Construction Meetings 8 0 12 52 0 $6,548 3.2.5 Field Testing,Start-up,Final Construction Review,&Punch List 0 8 62 0 $7,044 3.2.6 Record Drawing Preparation 0 4 12 62 $6,372 SUBTOTAL PHASE 111: 4 88 333 16 $58,554 OTHER COSTS: Direct Costs/Re ro ra hics/Co ies/Mila a/Delieveries 1 $9,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS AND BUDGET: 65 287 759 946 $223,307 [1]-This is an estimate of expenses. Expenses beyond this amount will be billed at cost. H:\GRP13\PDATA\10100606\Proposat\FEE_rev.WB2 Page 2 of 2 ROBERT BEIN, WILLum FROST & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS , PLANNERS & SURVEYORS HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE Effective January, 2000 OFFICE PERSONNEL Principal . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . ...... .. .. . . ... .. .. . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . $160.00 Project Director . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. ... . . . . . ...... ... . . .. . .... . . . . .. . . . .... . . . . . . .. . . . . 140.00 Structural Engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. . . ... .. . . ....... . . . ... . .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . 127.00 Project Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . ... .. . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121.00 Senior Engineer/Planner . . . . .. . . . ... . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . ... . . . . ... ... . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . 110.04 Corrosion Engineer . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 98.00 Project Engineer. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98.00 • Senior Designer . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . ... . .. . . . ... .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . 94.00 Design Engineer/Designer/Mapper(CADD) ... . . . .. ... . . . . ... .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86.00 Environmental Manager . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. ... .. . .. .. . . . . . . . 84.00 Senior Drafter/Technician . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. ... . . .. . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . ... ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76.00 Designer/Planner/Assistant Engineer. .. . . .... . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... ...... . . . . . ... . . . . . 72.00 Drafter/Graphic Artist . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .... . . .. .. . . . . . ..... . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. 65.00 Environmental Analyst/Staff Planner . . . ..... .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . 63.60 Engineering/Planning Aide . . . . . . . .. .. . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 45.00 FIELD PERSONNEL 2-Person Survey Crew .. . . . . . . . .:. . . ...... :. . .. . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . $170.00 1-Person Survey Crew . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . .. . . . . .. . . ..... . . . .. . . . . .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . 120.00 Field Supervisor .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 108.00 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL Construction Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... . . . . $130.00 Field Superintendent . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... . . 104.00 Resident Engineer/Project Manager . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 103.00 Assistant Field Superintendent. . . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . ... . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83.00 Senior Construction Inspector . . . . .. ... . . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83.00 Construction Inspector . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ..... . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79.00 Field Office Engineer. . . . . . . .. . . . . ... . . . . .... . .. . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76.00 Construction Technician . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . ... . .. . . . . ..... .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60.00 COMPUTER&OTHER SERVICE FEES P.C.Work Station . . . . . . . . . .. . ...... . . . . ... . .... ... . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . $15.00 Clerical/Word Processing . . .. . . . ... . . . . ... .. .. .... . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 42.00 Consultation Relative to Legal Actions . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . .. .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250.00 Vehicle Mileage .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .... . ... .. ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .... . . . . . . . . . . . 0.35/Mile Note: Blueprinting,reproduction,messenger service and other direct expenses will be charged as an additional cost plus 15%.A Subconsultant Management Fee of fifteen-percent(15%)will be added to the direct cost of all subconsultant services to provide for the cost of administration,subconsultant consultation and insurance. sca Professional Service Since 1944 14725 ALTON PARKWAY, IRVINE,CA 92618-2069 •P.O. BOX 57057,IRVINE,CA 92619-7057 •949.472.3505 •FAX 949.472.8373 OFFICES LOCATED THROUGHOUT CALIFORNIA,ARIZONA AND NEVADA•WEB SITE:www.rbf.com Pb�. � i ATTACHMENT #3 � DATE MM/DD/YY12/02/99 l ACO D R �µµwwYY kE WNW: . .. .. ....... ................................ PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS -A MATTER OF INFORMATION Aon Risk Services, Inc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 611 Anton Blvd., Suite 1000 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED .BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY 714-957-6005 A United Pacific Ins. Co. INSURED COMPANY Robert Bein, William Frost B Reliance National Indemnit & Associates COMPANY P. O. Box 57057 C Irvine, CA 92619-7057 COMPANY D ..::::...............:::.:::::::::: ......::::........................ ......::::::::::.:::::::::::::::.::.::::::::::::::::::.::::.:...:.:........:::::.::::.:........,.......,,.....:::.:......,.......:.,.,.......,. :.: ................::..........._.............................................. ....... ..............:............................_..................................................... ..... :.-:.:.:,:.,::...::...::..::.::.> THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS LTR DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE IMM/DD/YY► GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2000000 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PQ8573175 11/30/99 11/30/00 PRODUCTS-COMP/OPAGG $ 2000000 CLAIMS MADE X❑OCCUR _ PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1000000 OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1000000 X Contractual FIRE DAMAGE(Any one fire) $ 650000 IXI Broad Form MED EXP IAny one person) $ 5000 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY A X ANY AUTO PQ8573175 11/30/99 11/30/00 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1000000 ALL OWNED AUTOS - BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS APPROVED As TO FORM:, (Per person) $ X HIRED AUTOS GAIL HUTTON, C•.tY Attorney 44 }� Cit Attorney BODILY INJURY S X NON-OWNED AUTOS &ly�. �e (per accident) 'p PROPERTY DAMAGE $ GARAGE LIABILITY J AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: <. - EACH ACCIDENT $ AGGREGATE $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5000000 A X UMBRELLA FORM QU8573175 11/30/99 11/30/00 AGGREGATE $ 5000000 OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND X WC STATU. OTH- YLIM B EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY NWA014771201 7/01/99 7/01/00 EL EACH ACCIDENT $ 1000000 THE PROPRIETOR/ INCL EL DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1000000 PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE: EXCL EL DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 1000000 OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS Re: All operations. Certificate holder is named as additional insured per attached CG 20 10. »» >>:>'.><':s>< >< >< ': 7ibt1E <>;> <>>< >>?>>»< >':>>>':<...... .C�iA1CI=Elkl. ::..:::::..:........................................................:.:.....:,....::::.::::::::::._:::::::.... .................................:............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .. .... SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE City of Huntington Beach EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL 2000 Main Street 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER N O THE LEFT, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 0 AUTHORIZED REPRESE&r 111820000 ::.::.: ........................:.::..::::::::::....................:::: ..:::.:................:........:.......................:..:::::::::.:::::.:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::.::.:::::::::1 ...-............. . ... .:.:: .... :::: . :....... . ..: CO.b:; ; : : »:.. :. : .:: :. :::::::.;::< ,::; ::>>::::::: COfiD:Ci3ftPOFLAn fN;'t9188: POLICY NUMBER: PQ8573175 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Form CG2010 1185 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY, PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS (FORM B) This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART. SCHEDULE Name of Person or Organization: City of Huntington Beach, its agents, officers, and employees (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declaration as applicable to this endorsement.) WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of"your work" for that insured by or for you. Primary Insurance: It is agreed that such insurance as afforded by this policy for the benefit of the additional insured shall be primary insurance as respects to any claim, loss or liability arising directly or indirectly from the insured's operations and any other insurance maintained by the additional insured shall be noncontributory with the insurance provided hereunder. CG 20 10 11 85 Client : 6255 ROBERBEIN M CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 4/14/00 PRODUCER FALTER CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Dealey, Renton & Associates Y AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE P. O: BOX 10550 DER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Santa Ana, CA 92711-0550 714 4 2 7--6 810- - INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED - INSURER A: Lloyds/Other London Ins . Robert Bein, William Frost INSURERS: and Associates INSURERC: 14725 `Alton Parkway LINSURERD: Irvine, CA 92618 I I INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS LTR I DATE MM/DD/YY DATE MM/DD/YY GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE Is �COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY FIRE DAMAGE(Any on.fire) $ CLAIMS MADE OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) Is PERSONAL a ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE ;S �EN'L AGGREIGAATTE LIM ITAPPLIES PER: PRODUCTS -COMP/OP AGG IS POLICY I j PRO- �LOC i AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ �� (Ea accident) ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS i BODILY INJURY $ SCHEDULED AUTOS OR (Per person) HIRED AUTOS A� TO Attor ney gpPROVED Clay BODILY INJURY NON-OWNED AUTOS I C�[L HUTTO1 Attorn, (Per accident) $ Vty cit. —� By PROPERTY DAMAGE I l (Per accident) S 1 GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT I$ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC -S i AUTO ONLY: AGG S I j EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S OCCUR CLAIMS MADE I AGGREGATE Is Is DEDUCTIBLE i$ RETENTION $ I$ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WC STATU- OTH- EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY _ I T RY LIMITS ER E.L.EACH ACCIDENT is E.L.DISEASE-EA EM_PL OYEE $ E.L.DISEASE-POLItx�IJMIT 1$ A OTHER professional ;879P00433099 11/30/99 11/30/00 $1, 000, OR Per Claim (Liability $1, 000, 0 An Aggr 'yam DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS Re : All Operations as performed by Named Insured. If cancelled for non-payment of premium, 10 days notice given. D � r'PI o r J CERTIFICATE HOLDER ADD ITIONAL INSURED;INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION SHOULD ANYOFTH E ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION City Of Huntington Beach DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL$[ gVIAIL30 DAYS WRITTEN Attn: Thomas A. Rulla, NOTICETOTHE CERTIFICATE HOLDERNAMEDTOTHELEFT KX Public Works Department �to > 0000a �¢>�oe� atv�>�ax;�s 2000 Main Street P.O. BOX 190 A RI ME T TIVE Huntin ton Beach CA 92648 ACORD 25-S(7/97)1 of 1 #S 3 4 7 9 6/M2 5 5 8 9 JLL 0 ACORD CORPORATION 1988 ATTACHMENT #4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPLICATION FOR INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS WAIVER OR MODIFICATION 1. Name/Title/Department of Requesting Staff Member Tom Rulla/Principal Civil Engineer/Public Works 2. Date of Request 3/28/00 3. Name of Contractoi/Permittee. Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates 4. . Description of work to be performed Professional consulting services for the design of Water Well No. 12 5. Value of Contract $250,000 6. Length of Contract 2 years (through construction) 7. Type of Insurance Waiver or Modification Requested: Hold harmless condition (see attached page) to include the word neg igPnt or d;rP performance of this agreement. (a)Limits: (b)Coverage 8. Have you contacted Risk Management to determine if professional liability coverage is available through SCOPE? 9. Reason for Request for Waiver or Reduction of Limits Consultant legal review considers existing wording to be non—specific. , 10. Identify the risks to the City if this request for waiver or modifications granted City must prove negligent or direct performance by consultant to enforce hold harmless protections for the city. 1/ Department Head Signature At (This section to be completed by Risk Manager) Recommendation: Approve Deny Risk Manager's Signature/Date (This section to be completed by City Attorney) Recommendation: Approve Deny City Attorney's Signature/Date Settlement Committee approv �[ �[Ifffi%fico required for this waiver. If Settlement Committee approval is required, submit this form to City Attorn be placed on the agenda. Recommendation: Approve Deny City-Council appr val [is is not] required for this waiver. If City Council approval is required, attach this form to th —RCA after considerate the Settlement Committee. This insurance waiver[is not] on City Council agenda. Reviewer's initials: j mp/mi s/inswaiver/3/14/00 ATTACHMENT #5 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS for Professional Consulting Services for Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation Cash Contract No. 1119 January 14, 2000 PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS: Responses to the Request for Proposal (Proposal) are to be submitted to: - -- ------ - -------- --- Thomas A. Rulla, P.E. Engineering Division Public Works Department City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 no later than 4:00 P. M. on February 15, 2000. Four copies of the Proposal shall be submitted in a sealed envelope and marked: "Proposal for Well No. 12 Pump and Facilities Installation." Proposals received after the specified time will not be accepted and will be returned unopened. Questions regarding this request may be directed to Thomas A. Rulla at 714/536-5524. A pre-proposal meeting will be held at the Water Operations conference room located at 19001 Huntington Street at 2:00 P.M. on January 28, 2000. INDEX SECTION PAGE 1. Introduction 2 n. Schedule of Events 2 III. Project Description 3 IV. Scope of Work 5 V. Project Schedule 7 vi. Proposal Requirements 7 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP INDEX (cont'd) SECTION PAGE vn. General Requirements 9 viu. Consultant Evaluation & Selection Process 10 ix. Proposal Instructions and Conditions 1 1 X. Attachments 12 I. INTRODUCTION The City of Huntington Beach (City) is requesting proposals from firms short- listed from the initial Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation. The Project site is located in the northwestern portion of the City at the intersection of Rancho Road and Astronautics Drive, adjacent to the Navy railroad tracks as shown on Attachment A. The Record of Survey 98-1017 of the site is provided Attachment B. Required services include providing detailed design for a natural gas engine driven line-shaft vertical turbine pump, piping, electrical controls and equipment, chemical treatment including fluoride and chlorine storage, feed systems, and secondary chlorine containment, equipment and chemical buildings, and other site improvements. As described in the RFQ, the project includes completion of permanent pumping and appurtenant facilities to previously drilled conjunctive use domestic water well. The well construction report prepared by Camp Dresser & McKee dated December 1995 is provided as Attachment C. Also refer back to the RFQ for additional information. II. SCHEDULE OF EVENTS January 14, 2000 Issuance of Request for Proposals January 28, 2000 Mandatory Pre-proposal Meeting (two weeks after issuance) February 15, 2000 Proposals due at City Hall by 4:00 P.M. February 23, 2000 Interviews March 20, 2000 City Council Approval of Consultant Contract (estimated date) Page 2 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION As indicated in the RFQ, construction of Well No. 12 began in September 1995 and included drilling the well and test pumping. The well was drilled to a depth of 807 feet, casing bottom was set to a depth of 760.5 feet and bottom casing screen openings were set at 740 feet. Bentonite seals were placed at the bottom of the borehole. Concerns related to possible color or odor resulted in test pumping. The water quality results of test pumping are included with the memorandum dated October 20, 1999 in Attachment D. Although not part of the scope of work for the well project, the City intends to connect the well directly to the domestic system by a new distribution pipeline constructed in Astronautics Drive. In the event the permanent pipeline is not available for start-up and operation of the well, the system shall include provisions to provide full start-up pumping to waste from the well discharge piping system to the storm drain standpipe as shown on attachment E. The basic design characteristics and parameters for the well project are as follows: • The recommendations from the CDM test report shall be followed. • The well shall be designed to deliver 3,000 gpm. • The well shall be a natural gas engine line-shaft vertical turbine pump. • The pump shall be set at 200 feet bgs to limit fine-grained materials from entering the borehole. • The natural gas engine shall be by Waukesha. Other makes of engines are not acceptable to keep spare parts low, reduce training for operation/calibration, and minimize repair costs. • LPG fuel back up shall be provided and include a Ransome gas vaporizer-mixer. • The engine pump combination shall be designed for full speed maximum capacity at a point on its performance curve that is to the right of the point of maximum efficiency, such that the operation of the unit will provide as much flow rangeability as possible. Efficiency in all cases shall be above 75 percent. • The engine minimum speed (minimum capacity) shall be at a point on the performance curve that is to the left of the point of maximum efficiency, such that the operation of the unit will provide as much flow rangeability as possible. The efficiency in all cases shall be above 75 Page 3 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP percent. The minimum capacity should be less than or equal to of the maximum capacity, or a 2:1 turn down. • Engine speeds shall match pump speed such that the engine is 75 percent loaded (75 percent of max horsepower at a given speed and 7 inches of mercury) at pump maximum design capacity. • Pump/engine combinations shall have at least 300-rpm separation between minimum and maximum pump flow capacities, including 5 percent gearhead/drive-line horsepower loss. • The Engine shall be designed for pre-lubrication before starting. • The pump/engine assembly shall be housed in a building with provisions for pulling the pump, ease of access for normal operation and major maintenance. No restroom is required. • Murphy 500 (or 550 if available) automatic engine controller shall be included and programmed for ModBus communications protocol. • Disinfection shall include one ton chlorine cylinders, feed system, and provision for backup to allow continuous operation. Secondary chlorine containment shall be provided by TGO® coffer vessels. • Provisions for aqua ammonia feed for future conversion to chloramination disinfection shall also be included. • Fluoridation shall be provided using hydro fluorosilicic acid. Separate chemical storage housing shall be included. • Start-up pump to waste and pressure relief shall be connected to the reinforced concrete standpipe within the 20-foot utility easement. • Permanent electric power is required for general-purpose power and lighting. Preferred primary power is three phase 220 volt. • Sand separators are not required. • Provisions for high attenuation sound control shall be included. • Engine cooling shall be provided by heat exchanger. • The building enclosure shall be designed to dissipate engine heat. • Pulsed DC magnetic flow meter shall be utilized together with Cla-Val type pressure regulator and relief valves. • Building structures and equipment shall be designed as essential facilities. By separate contract, the City is in the process of upgrading the SCADA system for the water system and storm drain lift stations. The proposed system will include a new system Master controller with PC file server workstations and spread spectrum redundant radio systems to interface with the SCADA master radio and at each RTU site. The system will include start/stop, open/close functions, execute control strategies and various supervisory application control. Design of the well project shall incorporate the SCADA control utilizing a new spread spectrum radio transmission system now under development Page 4 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP by the City but NOT PART OF THIS WORK. Telephone service shall be included in the well project in the event delays occur in upgrading the existing SCADA system and for operator use or back up for SCADA control. IV. SCOPE OF WORK Basic Services In general, the consultant shall perform all necessary functions required for the total design for the well project. The consultant shall identify those aspects of the project work proposed to be performed by subconsultants. The consultant shall provide all project design and engineering services including, but not limited to, geotechnical investigations, surveying, civil, structural, landscaping, mechanical, electrical, instrumentation and control system design services needed to construct the well project. Architectural design and site landscape development are also required. It is anticipated that a City building permit will be required for the pump building. It is also necessary to obtain approvals from the City Planning Department, Design Review Board, and the Public Works Commission. Clearance from the South Coast Air Quality Management District and California Environmental Quality Act are also required. It should be assumed that an initial study and negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration would be necessary. The consultant shall assist the City with amending its water supply permit and any modifications required for process safety management and Health and Safety Code requirements to incorporate the new well. The City will pay all application and permit fees. Design services will include the preparation of plans, full specifications in CSI format incorporating City provided Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Bidding Documents, Sample Contract, Special and General Conditions. The consultant shall prepare cost estimates, schedules, progress reports, meeting minutes, and other documents as needed. Services shall include preparation of presentation materials and speaking before the public,_ review boards, and commission hearings. Preliminary Activities and Design Phase It is desired that the consultant separate the work into defined stages including preliminary, 60, 90 percent, and final design. Page 5 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP Additional tasks that will be included during the course of the work include information gathering, interviews, field site work, and various other meetings. Bid Evaluation and Construction Support Phase The consultant shall include a separate phase of work in the proposal for bid evaluation and to provide construction support including review of submittals, responding to requests for information, evaluating proposed change orders, periodic and final field construction reviews to ensure the design intent is followed and as required for the Engineer of Record. The City of Huntington Beach will be responsible for survey control, advertising, and awarding of the construction contract. The City will also provide day-to-day construction management with assistance from the consultant as indicated above. Additional Services The consultant shall propose for a fixed fee, the preparation of standard plans and specifications for the construction of similar water wells. The proposal shall be based on the following performance guidelines: • Plans should assume the same general design criteria as Well No. 12. • Plans should include section views and details and/or "fill in the blank" type callouts for specified information. • Generic plans should allow for custom, site specific, building design and dimensions. • Plans should assume construction is adjacent to City streets. • Plans should be written such that all standardized materials and methods of construction are accounted for and unique information should be shown as "fill in the blank". • Specifications should be for the technical portions that will be attached to City boilerplate general sections and bid documents. These services are considered additional to, and independent of, the services required for the design and construction assistance for Well No. 12. The City will consider the scope of work and fee proposed by the successful proposer, and may either accept unchanged, negotiate changes in scope or fee, or reject unchanged these additional services. Page 6 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP V. PROJECT SCHEDULE It is requested that all design work be completed and ready for advertising construction within 180 days after Notice to Proceed is given by the City. Extensions of time due to unforeseen delays resulting from public reviews, hearings or permit or agency approvals will be granted. The City will then proceed with advertising and awarding the construction contract. VI. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Although no specific format is required by the City, this section is intended to provide guidelines to the consultant regarding features which the City will look for and expect to be included in the proposal. Content & Format --- ----- ------------------------------ -- The City requests that proposals submitted are organized and presented in a neat and logical format and relevant to this project. Consultant's proposals shall be clear, accurate, and comprehensive. Excessive or irrelevant material will not be favorably received. Proposals shall contain no more than 25 typed pages using a 12 point minimum font size, including transmittal letter and resumes of key people, but excluding Index/Table of Contents, tables, charts, graphic exhibits, and sample drawings. The purpose of these restrictions is to minimize the preparation cost and to ensure that the response to the proposal is fully relevant to the project. The proposal shall include the following: • Transmittal letter • Page numbering • Index/Table of Contents • Approach and Work Plan • Team Organization including an organization diagram • Project Schedule • Reference and Similar Project Listing • Separate Statement of Offer and Fee Proposal Approach A description of the firm's approach and work program shall be included in this section. It should explain the technical approach, methodology, and Page 7 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP specific tasks and activities that will be performed to address the specific issues and work items. Team Organization The purpose of this section is to describe the organization of the project team including subconsultants and key staff. A project manager and an alternate project manager shall be named who shall be the prime contact and be responsible for coordinating all activities with the City. The City reserves the right to review and approve/disapprove all key staff and subconsultant substitution or removal, and may consider such changes not approved to be a breach of contract. An organization diagram shall be submitted showing all key team members. Fee Proposal Requirements A Fee Proposal shall be submitted in a separate, sealed envelope and marked as "Fee Proposal" along with the name of the project. In preparing the fee proposal for this project, the consultant shall take into consideration the following: 1 . Compensation for services provided to complete the complete design, document preparation, approvals, meetings, for the preliminary and design phase of the project for a total fixed fee. Compensation for services provided for the bid evaluation and construction support phase for a total fixed fee. Compensation for the additional services to provide standard plans and specifications for a total fixed fee. 2. The City also requires a breakdown of the fee, based on labor classifications, non-labor, and subconsultant activities. 3. A work plan including a breakdown of labor hours by employee billing classification, together with the cost of non-labor and subconsultant services shall be included with the fee proposal. The labor breakdown shall be compiled based on project phases and tasks that correlates with the consultant's defined scope of work for the project proposal. This information will be used by City staff to evaluate the reasonableness of the fee proposal and will be used in negotiating the final fee amounts for the contract agreement. 4. The consultant's standard billing rates for all classifications of staff likely to be involved in the project shall be included with the fee proposal along with the mark-up rate for any non-labor expenses and subconsultants. Page 8 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP 5. Reimbursable expenses shall not be allowed unless negotiated prior to a contract. 6. Upon award of a contract, the consultant shall prepare progress billings reflective of the project schedule, project phases, and progress milestones. VII. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Insurance Requirements The consultant shall furnish with the proposal proof of the following minimum insurance coverage. These minimum levels of coverage are required to be maintained for the duration of the project: General Liability Coverage - $1 ,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Professional Liability Coverage - $1,000,000 per occurrence (note: A "claims made" policy is acceptable). Worker's Compensation Coverage : State statutory limits. Deductibles, Self-Insurance Retention, or Similar Forms of Coverage Limitations or Modifications must be declared to and approved by the City of Huntington Beach. A Sample Certificate is included as Attachment F. The consultant is encouraged to contact its insurance carriers during the proposal stage to ensure that the insurance requirements can be met if selected for negotiation of a contract agreement. Standard Form of Agreement The consultant will enter into an agreement with the City based upon the contents of the RFP and the consultant's proposal. The City's Sample Contract is included as Attachment G. The City may require the selected Page 9 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP consultant to participate in negotiations and to submit such technical, fee, or other revisions of their proposals as may result from negotiations. City Assigned Representatives The City will assign a responsible representative to administer the contract, and to assist the consultant in obtaining information. VIII. CONSULTANT EVALUATION & SELECTION PROCESS Firms will be evaluated on their knowledge, experience, and capability to provide detailed design of this type of project based on the following: • Capability to provide detailed design drawings, specifications for complete construction contract documents. • Experience with design of natural gas fueled engine driven vertical turbine well pumps. • Experience with building design for sound control and building heat dissipation and site aesthetics. • Use of value engineering, life cycle cost analysis and other cost control strategies. • Ability to obtain appropriate permits and regulatory approvals, including a list of those agencies the consultant would anticipate being involved. Experience with municipal government code compliance including, but not limited to, obtaining conditional use and design review board approvals. • Experience with preparation of documents and approval process for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Other factors that will be considered include organization and management, financial capacity, quality control, record of performance, and professional licensing. The City's consultant evaluation and selection process is based upon Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) for professional services. The City's selection team will interview the three highest top ranked written proposals. Page 10 i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP A 100 point evaluation system will be used based upon the weighting indicated below. Familiarity and prior experience of consultant team with detailed design of this type of project. (25 points) Qualifications and experience of the project manager and other key individuals. (30 points) Results of reference checks. (15 points) Clarity of proposal. (15 points) Compliance with proposal requirements. (15 points) IX. PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS AND CONDITIONS Pre-Contractual Expenses Pre-Contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by proposers in: • Preparing a proposal in response to the RFP • Submitting that proposal to the City of Huntington Beach (City) • Negotiating with the City in any matter related to this RFP, proposal, and/or contractual agreement • Any other expenses incurred by the proposer prior to the date of an executed contract. The City shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by any proposer. In addition, no proposer shall include any such expenses as a part of the price proposed to perform the requested services. Authority to Withdraw RFP and/or Not Award Contract The City reserves the right to withdraw the RFP at any time without prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any agreement will be awarded to any proposer responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserves the right to postpone the opening of proposals for its own convenience and to reject any and all proposals in response to this RFP without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s). Page 11 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Water Well No. 12, Pump and Facilities Installation RFP Right to Reject Proposal The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted. Any award made for this engagement will be made to the proposer which, in the opinion of the City, is best qualified to perform the services. Discrepancies in Bid Documents Should proposer find discrepancies in, or omissions from the RFP, or if the intent of the invitations are not clear, and if provisions of the specifications restrict proposer from proposing, they may request in writing that the deficiency(s) be modified. Such request must be received by the City five (5) days before due date. All proposers will be notified by addendum of any approved changes in RFP documents. Oral Statements The City is not responsible for oral statements made by any of their employees or agents concerning the RFP. If the proposer required specific information, proposer must request that the City supply it in writing. X. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A --- Location Map and Site Map Attachment B --- Record of Survey Attachment C --- CDM Well Construction Report Attachment D --- Test Pumping Record Sample Data Attachment E --- Storm Drain Connection Attachment F --- Sample Insurance Certificate Attachment G --- Sample City Contract Page 12 IX. ATTACHMENTS A - LOCATION MAP AND SITE MAP B - RECORD OF SURVEY C - CDM WELL CONSTRUCTION REPORT D - TEST PUMPING RECORD SAMPLE DATA E - STORM DRAIN CONNECTION F - SAMPLE INSURANCE CERTIFICATE G - SAMPLE CITY CONTRACT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES WATER WELL NO. 12, PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION CASH CONTRACT NO. 1119 JANUARY 14, 2000 Attachment A Location Map and Site Map PROJECT: i WA TER WELL NO. 12 PUMP AND FACILITIES INSTALLATION C' S 171% AVE. Ale FADDEN AVE. EDINGER AVE. Q Y S W HEIL AVE. m = U =N SJ F m u gn WARNER AVE. SLATER AVE. 4 o 405 TALBERT AVE. - l � ELLIS AVE. GARFIELD AVE. y, YORXTC NN AVE. 3 ADAMS AVE. o � � Y INOUWAPOLIS Fl AVE. 0 N = ATLANTA AVE. C p� HAMILTON AVE. CQ� NIN A r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH VICINITY M A P DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS wa�vae��os�wa.+ 138.95' MEAS FOUND PUNCHED SPIKE. FOUND NOTHING SET NOTHING NO REFERENCE ESTABLISHED BY HOLDING RECORD 015' NWLY OF UNE ^ CL RANCHO RO DISTANCE PER(R7) N49-34.06-E (2495.86' R2) (2495.60 R5) (249v 6.10'R6. R7) 2496.10• MEAS b 0 0 n CITY OF WESTMINSTER CITY LIMITS 50' o 'v r 20• a 1 Z 37.50' i . NVfLY UNE R.S.B. 60/13 - - FOUND NOTHING.SET N4934'06'E. 20.00' (R1) k MEAS— ENE D AND BRASS OF BR WALL TAGGED LS 7340 20.00' cn W W o In W 0 'yL yO '� n q N N Fn c n 1 172.00• 'a o z o SCALE 1 = 40' ZZ w 33 Z 3 f W O %n a O 1 Z 9s� 'AO,L h a 9G N zo.aD 0 tr Ilk A�qa N49'34'06'E. 20.00' (RI) do MEAS. Il k� Z N N49'34'06'E 116.55'(Rt) 116.75-MEAS < FOUND NOTHING. SET r o LEAD AND BRASS BRAD o N IN FOOTING OF BLOCK WALL 0 Io WELL No. 12 LOCATION a TAGGED LS 7340 W Uri Pa ---1-24.64* `�z 1� z� 1/f {{Zyy W U< 3 oK 8 h IA p 73' IA O <V. W z 7 O ` FOUND NOTHING.SET O LEAD AND BRASS BRAD "q W FOOTING OF BLOCK N wALL TA=O LS 7340 My 3730, N49.34'06'E, 16.60• LRl) 1. MEAS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SITE M A P C P i Attachment B Record of Survey ACCEPTED AND FILED AT THE SHEET 1 OF ' RECORD O F SURVEY 9 8 - 101 I --------------------------- Kock 1T--MODULE DArE _____________________ 5845 27 tiNE ---------rtc S_------ LOCATED IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH. COUNTY OF ORANGE, EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED INSTRUMENT 9------------- �/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING A SURVEY OF A PORTION OF FRACTIONAL PER GOVERNMENT CODE 6103 SEC 9, T5S, RIiW, SBM., AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 60, PAGE 13 9mK U)' OF RECORDS OF SURVEY, LOCATED IN RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY GARY L.GRANVILLE FG PM FUN09M SPa0.TA0001 DATE OF SURVEY MARCH 1998. JOSEPH G DERLETH. LS 7340 CU UNIY CLERK -RECORDER to 2221.POI tR>Q CL WCTORIA PL(EASfl .----_-_-------.-' m. AI ID PIAICao TK noD FERE.CE 9RT DETMITY d Pxb°�M� (NI974'06'E HELD PFR R6,R7)(NR0.7G R:,)34�0.92'AREAS ,�,p,q,a>n„n tr NINE.No rAG.xo IN7FRE/1U ( a>J t9a1.m'IIEAa POOO P1R100D SPIKE. Iaao nnRRts a,Ron9,P RS1ANIfND AOdlm�Rem ACCEPTED AS S9a0.AM TA0 PER(Ra) d ' IW.Or T49uDO 9r R. NRUN, osrARRM PR 907.52 (RA RO!WAS mad T IAE CL RANCHO R srARM ICE DDi 57.50 57.SO 1 — M) 1 (Ixi7r RA RQ I.RAr WAS 7M.99•(RI)!YEAS IRAAe nCl wanRlw mlmaA x.rH'oat(199G.or A4(24MA0' RD)(2Wnid Al.R7)259AId I<AS I -- I-0zt. mN '.O'N. AS A 1 1/r 1 1 xlrafm'E(9.SId RS)(fNnIf RI)9N.A7 YEAS ,MM,AAI w ml a fnaR Rxa ICE 9 1 1 R1A,D�on.o mMlap n a A RIL Noa90R MR RA!M m g I O I HAe 9M,ra aA N) �• -CITY OF NESTMINSIER CITY LIMITS• , t l 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY LIMITS �- -- -_ aCC 1 , -_ CITY OF WESTMINSTER_Q_TY LIMITS Er YI 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY OMITS Iq�m AOnxq AilO t I at No- -_ - 1 �----•• ------------------ - `IDfLTIK R.fB a0/y -------__------- 77.a0' I , IQxRI RNO[D YAM10.[ - �6 wM1MMSUM URN N/raa'a�xim pq!Rus tn�•m�°&'$�f4R1 I LOT 1 A �� limn u 7ao I 1 PARCEL MAP IFZA(.;I 4370 � BKI,PGS 3-5 ,� 13 COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT -1 MM 170/13 —14 g INS MAP HAS BEEN EXAMINED IN ACCORDANCE• .. I '� NTH SECTION 8756 OF THE LAND SURVEYOR'S ' `' at ACT INS DAY OF 1098. g + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . k a� i 1 3t I a � ,M CANES.COIUMTY SURVEYOR R.S.B. 60/13 f ? g q LOT 2 - 172.00' •F f >i 1!i xrlr wR TRA9T aa9 g , I'D 1•P 1A 1)IS 7O19 F a rt i IN mu or MOST SDUTHMT can irA1RACCIIAAJ R-t -1 AT NOUo96 RECORD MST PER IRS,NO Sl1RVEY0R'S STATEMENT A' I SAD •PPE WAS FOUND TO BE.51' !I ED PUNCHED RwmAD SPIKE Ar REST 3 t A1A71 n 01 SAID ESTABLISHED POINT AT R THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY , a ACCEPTED A aArtaD s mtxil7l OF LINE NO AS SPIKE PEE ROOD 1 (1 1 Q NO M TAG PER(Rq 1 iy EC110N IN NTH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAND SURVEYORS' OR AC 6 t ACT. —•— — — — — - -•- - - - 7.Of Diq A IN:AS , (11.117Ym�.txi7e'R;R9 ROTATED TO eAas AT THE REQUEST OF DOUGLAS KATO,PRINCIPAL ENCINEEA FOR THE CITY OF 1d t 9RO51 N9r]K51't.Ixi>!'NV[ASW raor t P01 TstAeusao Ar NRADOK aEc Drsr PEN 7o nRlMnn aAuroa ra E.or tEST HUNTDIOTON BEACH IN APPoL.1oD4 '. 7 Q T 1 (R]!Aa)ALO/O ELT AA M01T 6 11AY. A LINE.NO TAG.ICI RMEHEIHCE A 1 ro A1xTP7ED N[ir DORNOI Or TRACT ax9 O 9 1 ACCEPTED As SPI10:AND FAO PER(x5) .IOSEPIU C DER1ElH % NanrmL mad p91)a WIN Y 1 LS 73E0. EXPIRES 12/31/2001 / D STATEMENT OF PURPOSE �+ 1 LOT 1 11es su�M:T 1 PERrOR1OD 11 11,AND MOAMNT 6A95 a BEARINGS 2 Ion IIl'"l)11675wm �� K' ^i 3 THE CORNERS Or THE PARCEL DESOaIon N OR.19070371745 1v 1xY AND OR.19970311143 SINCE INS WAS A DUUED PARCEL !/ (( raoMRP'A'�ttm7■RL $t p A RECORD Cr SUR%y IS KIND SUBMITTED PER SECLON BASS O 1KAlalm IS 11497aO9T ��/� TIDE IGD 1OG71u1 Mn®R»o �:a ±i - - r a No](E)K THE L.SACf. PET IN COUNTY IRM ZCNfAL CONTROL PONT 51N y R S� AT 049A 09rA SW NO RANCHO RD AND UK PUNCHED MANDIE r 1 :7 wM AT aum"STR M0 name PU MR A%&9ona �-!._:..� a� T R A C T 4369 & .. j, PER nrED RECORDED 1 I . . AS 19970371745 Or O.R.. g I M M 1 70/1 1—1 2 ' REFERENCE; YOAlip1T NDi[S .� R I (III)REGARD PER OR 19970371745 ■ .SET T 1/Y CALYANZED PIPE TAMED IS 7340 t p ¢ (RI)RECORD PER TRACT 7504 DOOR Gd,Loam Oi1Q9lY 1Ol[D � 91TU15ECIKN DATA + t LOT 2 o M.IL S71na-n • .T01AD MOMAOC AS IIDIED DATA-A11`5"'(FAA7) ' ,• 1 /D 1•r TAmD IS W39 $I d �5)Y�1070/11-1 PE 12 .aa0. O OLLIb-m97r/1•WAS � I M Wal 937mus Nn MOST SCUINEALT + Iff (R.)RECORD PER lilAcr 97ra Cm o L MAC,aM9 er maw AEC Y.Y,t7O/13-1• R ——— a:,PER VR»sm.l PP9 lPIa rM.D . . . J+ m t.b AIMT ROM S/D[SraR»Rm .,7i. Lxs)RECORD PER LS T.&140-11 .. !f I ROST 9O,IIAAT CM O MIT 2 AT A (R9)P.M.B. PER PARCEL MAP E1ID N :ANNO Q s79'Toti CURVE DATA i (x7)R[C01D POt a.S.B.60/1] oRTA-rJtlr.L-LOW,R.159.Od MEAS ,� t DELTA-raft L-S.W. -ISLW Dtl) I I LOT 3. R ID PINOIED RAaROAo srIKC 1a TAa O7 OCI.W.971OC.L-IIII.9d.R-mG. TA OO (RI)!MEAs p a aAAool RA T RPERRDICE A[aP1m AS 5192 AEm O PER(RI) ,Av®M, ICE u a a rmm RR9pNq _ at Rwm Ta r RRR,P9 CL STARDUST DR i —nnr .rA n 9s/I;rluo IRD,IRo ii ROTA NNt>,xr,aAr Rai a Rw Attachment C CDM Well Construction Report McKeeCDM Carnp Dresser & WELL CONSTRUCTION REPORT ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL NO. 12 December 1995 CIO ----------------------------- -- 1 . WELL CONSTRUCTION REPORT ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL NO. 12 December 1995 r Prepared for: Orange County Water District Fountain Valley, California r Prepared by: Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Irvine, California CDM Project No. 9153-128-CS-REP2 1 RECEIVED DEPT. OF C'I�l !'unRKS ' DEC 1. 2 1995 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA Uontents . j s Contents Section 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 Section 2 Construction and Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Surface Casing Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Conductor Casing Installation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Pilot Hole Drilling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Geophysical Logging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 Aquifer Zone Isolation Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 Final Well Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-6 Reaming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-6 Final Well Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-6 Well Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-8 Well Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-9 Flowmeter Survey . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-10 Straightness Tests, Video Survey, and Chlorination . . . . . . . . . . . 2-12 Section 3 Conclusions and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 Appendix A Lithologic Logs Appendix B Sieve Analyses Appendix C Geophysical Logs, Caliper Logs, Flowmeter Logs Appendix D Water Quality Data Appendix E Test Pumping Data CDM Camp Dresser & McKee i3proj\9153.128\reports\wel lhb 121hb 12-rpt List of Tables Page Table No. 1 Zone Test Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-3 2 Zone Isolation Test Water Quality Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-5 3 Construction Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-7 4 Step Drawdown Test Results . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-9 5 Water Quality Results Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-11 6 Flowmeter Survey Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-12 List of Figures ,Figure Follows Page 1 Location of Huntington Beach Well No. 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 2 Graphic Geologic Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 3 Aquifer Zone Isolation Test Detail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2 4 Step Drawdown Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-9 5 Dynamic Flowmeter Survey Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-12 CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Mpro]W I53-128Meporte\wellhb 121hb 12.tp1 Section 1 Introduction On October 7, 1991, Orange County Water District (OCWD) retained Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) for design and construction services for Huntington Beach Well No. 12. As shown on Figure 1, Huntington Beach Well No. 12 is located east of the intersection of two branches of Rancho Road in the City of Huntington Beach. This report presents a summary of well design and construction monitoring efforts by CDM, and contains a summary of construction, development, and testing activities at the well site. The appendices to this report contain the various data collected during drilling and testing, including lithologic logs, geophysical logs, water quality analytical reports, sieve analyses, and test pumping data and analyses. OCWD prepared a draft contract document and construction specifications for construction of two new wells and rehabilitation of a third well in the City of Y._tntington Beach. The document was provided to CDM for review and comment. OCWD subsequently finalized the document which was released for bid in January 1994. Completed bids were received on January 24, 1994 by OCWD. Layne-Western Company, McCalla Division, of Chino, California (McCalla) was low bidder and was awarded the contract. The total bid price for construction of Well No. 12 was $305,284 Construction of Well No. 12 began on September 6, 1995 with the installation of the 52-inch diameter surface casing to a depth of 19 feet below ground surface (bgs). The 36-inch diameter conductor casing was installed to a depth of 192 feet bgs from September 13 to September 16. The pilot hole was drilled from September 18 to September 21, to a depth of 807 feet bgs. Additional construction and testing activities consisted of aquifer isolation zone testing from September 21 to September 26; reaming from September 27 to October 5; casing and screen installation from October 6 to October 7; gravel pack installation, consolidation and grouting from October 7 to October 8; mechanical development from October 8 to October 12, pump development and testing from October 18 to October 25; straightness test and disinfection on November 7, and the final videolog and plumbness test on November 10. In order to observe and document that the well was constructed in accordance with the contract documents, hydrogeologists were on-site during most phases of construction activities. Among the duties performed in the field were maintaining a daily log of construction activities, preparing daily construction reports, collecting lithologic samples, sieving selected lithologic .samples, preparing a lithologic log, collecting water quality samples during zone isolation testing and test pumping, assisting in the final well design, measuring and recording water levels during test pumping, and preparing a record drawing of the completed well. Observation was continuous during critical construction activities such as conductor hole and pilot hole drilling, installation of the casing, screen, gravel pack, and grout seal, and during test pumping. Observation was periodic during aquifer zone isolation tests, reaming, mechanical development and development with a test pump. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee I:tpr0PI0.128kepons%wellhb121hb12.rpt 1_1 I Q U s U Q J O m WESTMINSTER AVE S,q ti �-p WELL NO. N HB-12 C 0 O J � NFa SKYLAB WEST RD W c» H 07 MCDONNEL-DOUGLAS cno AEROSPACE p< BOLSA AVE W W �- �.� =Q> ca_.� = w � J Q U a v7 C Z O �Q Z Q d 3 N C° McFADDEN AVE w m x , ^= N v N SCALE 1 1/2' 0 1 MILE -i ti 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET 1 5 0 1 KILOMETER a ~ ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LOCATION OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ICDM WELL NO. 12 environmentol engineers, sclentlrts, Figure 1 planners, * management consultants Section 1 Introduction This report has been divided into three sections: Section 1 - Introduction, Section 2 - Construction and Testing, and Section 3 - Conclusions and Recommendations. Section 2 includes a discussion of each of the following twelve stages of well construction: ■ Surface casing installation ■ Conductor casing installation ■ Pilot hole drilling ■ Geophysical logging ■ Aquifer zone isolation testing ■ Final well design ■ Reaming ■ Final well construction ■ Well development ■ Well testing ■ Flowmeter survey ■ Straightness tests, video survey and chlorination Conclusions and recommendations are summarized in Section 3 of this report. CDM Cramp Dresser & McKee 1:1proj19153.12B4eports\wellhbiMb12.ro 1-2 Section 2 Construction and Testing Surface Casing Installation On September 6, 1995, an auger rig drilled a 60-inch diameter boring to a depth of approximately 23.5 feet below ground surface (bgs) for installation of a 52-inch outside diameter (OD) surface casing to a depth of 19 feet bgs. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 20 feet bgs. Conductor Casing Installation After the grout had set around the surface conductor casing, McCalla's Challenger 280 reverse circulation rotary rig was mobilized at the site to drill the conductor hole and the pilot hole. The drill rig has a total derrick height of about 52 feet. The rig uses 7-inch OD, 6-inch inside diameter (ID) tool joint pipe with an internal air line. Other equipment used during drilling operations included a portable mud tank with a total capacity of 9,500 gallons, and a 600 cubic feet per minute (CFM), 120 pounds per square inch (psi), Ingersoll Rand air compressor. Potable water obtained from a nearby fire hydrant was used as the drilling fluid. No drilling additives were used with the drilling fluid. The drilling fluid was circulated through a portable mud tank with internal baffles for settlement of the cuttings. During conductor hole drilling the drilling fluid was circulated through desander cones periodically to control the amount of solids in the drilling fluid. Because Well No. 12 is located adjacent to occupied residential dwellings, McCalla installed 16-foot-high sound-proof.blankets on the northern side of the drill site. McCalla commenced drilling the 17.5-inch diameter pilot hole for the conductor casing on September 13. The pilot hole was completed on September 13 at a depth of 206 feet. The borehole was subsequently reamed with 26-inch and 42-inch diameter bits during the period from September 14 to 15. On September 16, a 36-inch OD, 0.625-inch wall thickness conductor casing was installed to a depth of 192 feet bgs. On September 16, the annular space between the borehole wall and the casing was grouted through a temporary tremie pipe with a 10-sack sand-cement slurry to form the sanitary seal for the well, as required by the State of California. Pilot Hole Drilling On September 18, McCalla commenced drilling the pilot hole with a 17.5-inch diameter tricone mill-tooth bit. The pilot hole was completed on September 21, at a total depth of 807 feet bgs. Due to known aesthetic water quality problems (color and odor) associated with certain aquifer zones in the area, OCWD and the City of Huntington Beach decided that the pilot hole would not be drilled below approximately 800 feet bgs. During drilling of the conductor hole and pilot hole, CDM hydrogeologists collected lithologic samples every 10 feet, and at changes in formation. The samples were described, logged, and stored by CDM personnel in see-through plastic trays and plastic bags. Soil samples ranged from gravel to sand to silt to clay, with various combinations observed. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee isOMIV153.128kaport$XwellhbiMb12.tpt 2-1 Section 2 Construction and Testing Also, shell fragments were observed in samples from 168 to 186, 289 to 298, 407 to 427, 440 to 447, and 755 to 767 feet bgs. In addition, wood fragments were observed in the sample from 520 to 525 feet bgs. Appendix A contains the detailed lithologic log of materials penetrated during drilling. Figure 2 is a generalized graphic log of lithologic materials encountered during drilling. Selected intervals of lithologic samples were sieved and the results plotted on sieve analysis forms to be used later during the design phase. The sieve analyses are compiled in Appendix B. Throughout drilling operations, CDM and McCalla personnel monitored drilling fluid parameters including sand content, mud weight, and fluid viscosity. Drilling fluid additives were not used during any drilling activities. Deviation surveys were conducted by McCalla from 200 to 747 feet bgs in 100-foot intervals to determine the horizontal deviation of the pilot borehole from plumb. All surveys were within the specified limit of 0.5 degrees. Geophysical Logging After completion of the 17.5-inch pilot borehole and drift surveys, Welenco of Claremont, California was retained by McCalla to conduct geophysical logging of the borehole. The geophysical logs consisted of spontaneous potential, 16-inch and 64-inch normal resistivity, point resistivity, gamma ray, and guard resistivity (see Appendix Q. The geophysical logs were used to identify aquifer zones, and to aid in the final design of the well. Aquifer Zone Isolation Testing Aquifer zone isolation tests allow for the collection and analysis of water quality samples from discrete intervals within the borehole. This testing provides additional information necessary for the final design of the well in areas where the water quality is questionable. A total of three zones were selected for water quality sampling (Zone 1 - 691 to 712 feet bgs, Zone 2 - 529 to 550 feet bgs, and Zone 3 - 370 to 391 feet bgs). The main goal of the zone isolation testing was to determine the color, odor and general mineral content of water from each aquifer zone. Colored water ion fractionation testing was performed on the water samples from all three zones. Table 1 shows the location of the test intervals and seals for the zone isolation tests. Figure 3 shows generalized details for aquifer zone isolation testing. The following paragraphs describe the sampling procedure and the results of the water quality analyses. Upon completion of the 17.5-inch diameter pilot borehole, drift surveys, and geophysical logs, a temporary casing fabricated from a length of drill pipe with the lower 21 feet consisting of perforated casing, was.lowered into the pilot borehole so that the perforated section was located in the first zone test interval (zone 1, 691 to 712 feet bgs). A 50:50 ratio mix of gravel and granular bentonite seal was installed, using a tremie pipe, from 749 to 807 feet bgs. Gravel was introduced into the borehole, and placed a short distance below and above the perforated casing and completely around it. A bentonite seal was then placed in the borehole to form a five- to ten-foot upper seal. This completed the upper seal for the zone. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee I:Vmj'W1S3-12B1reponMweIIhb121hb12.rpt 2-2 0 300 600 ............. ............. 307 607 10 20 19 320 321 620 — — — 27 - _ —_ . 630 — 334 40 _= 340 342 640 — — 34T _ _ 647 — — 351 60 __ 360 — 660 =_- - - - 367 - - -_— — — — ......-..-. 676 80 — —= 380 680 ............. ::.:...:.:.. .............. ..... 84 ............. 94 100 400 — — 399 Too — — 407 SHELL FRAGMENTS PRESENT 416 120 420 720 ............. .............of 134 ::• SHELL FRAGMENTS PRESENT 730 140 440 T40 .. 740 — — 447 160 460 = 760 76T 472 176 478 776 180 480 — — — 780 186 487 N — — — 494 N 200 500 == ca 800- 206 __ L21807 m ' ' 211 TO . 807 m ` — WOOD FRAGMENTS PRESENT FT BGS 220 520 =_— 535 240 239 5406. .. 540 260 — — 258 560 55 565 67............. m -..-.. 272 x 280 580 SOME CLAY BALLS PRESENT 289 SILT i SHELL FRAGMENTS PRESENT C.) 300 298 600 . GRAVEL 8 SAND ............ v SAND i CD INTERBEDDED CLAY 8 SAND T[�] CLAY m i LITHOLOGIC LOG DATA COMPILED w FROM ELECTRIC LOG, GAMMA RAY 0 20 0 40 LOG AND FIELD DESCRIPTIONS. a ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL NO. 12 CDM GRAPHIC GEOLOGIC LOG environmental engineers, scientists. planners, 9 management consultants Figure 2 Al R I NLET Al R/WATER OUTLET 1-1/4" AIR INJECTION STRING SAMPLING STRING-MINIMUM 4" I.D. WITH PERFORATED PIPE SAMPLING TOOL 18"ls BOREHOLE STATIC WATER LEVEL BENTONITE SEAL FINE SAND o I GRAVEL EXTENDING APPROX. 5' ABOVE g — I-- SEPARATION BETWEEN AQUIFER AND AOUITARD J C ill ._ F- i O � e 21' OF 1/8" OR 0.125" MIL SLOT PERFORATIONS WITH OPEN AREA e e = APPROX. 5.5 SO. IN PER FT. o I e o ° ° N o 0 * o 0 0 o PEA GRAVEL e o o 0 0 0 Q e 1 1,11 0 o w z OOOOeo BENTONITE d Y 0000e U eoo0oo cQ = O eoe000 \ r N ooeoeo it 000000 � 0 � 000eoe O` w W N N LL w t- O a r 0 ui J oo0eoo N cot5'-10" oo°000 w a ° z Y Q H U_ > N _ coo 0 0 000eoe li.l H eeooeo O 0 Q Q Q U m N ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT al o CDI AOUIFER ZONE ISOLATION TEST DETAIL Cc environmental enoineers, scientists, 0- planners, 8 management consultants Figure 3 Section 2 Construction and Testing Table 1 Huntington Beach Well No. 12 Zone Test Details Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Perforated Interval 691 - 712 529 - 550 370 391 Lower Seal 749 - 807 598 - 606 395 - 400 Gravel Pack 672 - 749 520 - 598 353 - 395 Upper Seal 668 - 672 516 - 520 352 - 353 Minimum Purge 3,818 3,185 2,028 Volume (gallons) Volume Airlifted 86,000 21,000 102,000 :(gallons) 'Volume Pumped 3,900 5,150 35,055 (gallons) Water Level 68 60 50 (feet bgs) All intervals recorded in feet below ground surface Approximate zone volumes were determined according to the following calculation: Volume of interval between Volume of Volume of V,= bottom of sampling tool and + interval adjacent V2= wetted sampling top of lower seal to sampling tool tool V, = (0.3(nr,2 I,) + (0.3 (ur1 2 12 - nr22 12 )) (7.48) V2 = (nr3 2 13) (7.48) Minimum purge volume = 3V, +V2 V, = borehole volume in gallons V2 = volume at wetted sampling tool in gallons a = pi r, = borehole radius (9 inches or 0.75 feet) r2 = radius of sampling tool pipe (0.445 feet outer dimensions) r3 = radius of sampling tool pipe (0.425 feet inner dimensions) 11 = length of the gravel filled borehole below sampling tool 12 = length of gravel filled borehole adjacent to sampling tool 13 = length of wetted sampling tool pipe ,0.3 = 30% porosity of gravel material (estimated) 7.48 = 7.48 gallons per cubic foot CDM Camp Dresser & McKee t:lprop9153-128keponslwellhb121hb12.tpt 2-3 Section Construction and Testing After installing the temporary casing, gravel pack, and upper seals, the zone was then air-lift pumped until the specific conductance (electrical conductivity) of the discharge water stabilized and the discharge water was generally clear. After the discharge was generally clear and had been airlifted a minimum of six hours, a submersible pump was installed in the temporary casing. A minimum three to five borehole volumes and one wetted casing volume were pumped prior to sampling. A water quality sample was then collected and sent to the OCWD laboratory for general mineral and physical analysis with ion fractionation for colored water. After a sample was collected and pumping was stopped, a water level measurement was taken from inside the temporary casing and the casing was removed from the borehole. The results of the selected general mineral and physical water quality analyses are summarized in Table 2. No colored water was present in the three zone samples (unfiltered). All zones were below the 15-unit apparent color limit established by California Code of Regulations Title 22, Drinking Water Standards. The water quality analysis indicated good quality water in all zones. Laboratory water quality results are compiled in Appendix D. Final Well Design Upon completion of aquifer zone isolation testing, a final well design was prepared by CDM, OCWD, and the City of Huntington Beach. The final design was based upon evaluation of the lithologic log, geophysical logs, sieve analyses of the selected lithologic intervals, and results from the aquifer zone isolation tests. The final well design is shown in Table 3. Based upon an interpretation and comparison of lithologic logs and samples, geophysical logs and sieve analyses, Roscoe-Moss Ful-Flo shutter screen with a 0.055-inch slot size was selected as the screen material. A blend of 8 x 16 Colorado Silica sand was selected as the gravel pack material due to its grain size distribution. CDM performed several sieve analyses on the gravel pack material that was delivered to the site. Gravel pack material which was found to have a finer gradation than specified was used at the bottom of the borehole below the lowest screened section. Gravel pack which had a coarser gradation was used only in the bottoin of the borehole or adjacent to blank casing and was not placed adjacent to well screens. Sieve analyses are compiled in Appendix B. Rem Reaming operations began on September 27, after the geophysical logging and aquifer zone isolation testing of the borehole had been completed. The borehole was reamed to 34-inches from the bottom of the conductor casing (192 feet bgs) to a depth of approximately 243 feet, and 28-inches to a depth of approximately 784 feet. Upon completion of reaming operations on October 5, caliper logging of the reamed borehole (included in Appendix C) was conducted by Welenco. The caliper log was used to verify the reamed borehole diameters and calculate the amount of annular fill material needed. The caliper log revealed washouts at depths of 350, 395, and 750 feet bgs and the total borehole depth was measured at 762 feet bgs. As a result of this logging, the 28-inch diameter borehole was drilled deeper. The completed depth was 784 feet bgs. CDM Camp Dresser &McKee 1:1pro19153.1284epons%wellhb121hb12.ro 2_4 Table 2 Huntington Beach Well No. 12 Zone Isolation Test Water Quality Results Results Analysis Detection Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 California Constituent Name Method Limits Depth Depth Depth Drinking Water . 682-702 530-550 365-385 Standards Electrical Conductivity[umho/cm) 2510E 1 360 354 406 ••900/1,600 Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 1 226 184 224 '•500/1,000 pH[units) 4500H+B 8.2 8.1 8.2 6.5-8.5 Sodium A200.7 0.1 43.6 47.2 40.4 Potassium A200.7 0.1 2.0 2.4 2.3 Magnesium A200.7 0.1 1.8 2.5 7.0 Calcium A200.7 0.1 27.3 27.4 37.7 Iron[ug/Lj A200.7 1 230 390 310 '•300 tV?nganese[ug/L] A200.7 1 23 14 5 50 Total Alkalinity(as CaCO3) 2320E 1 128 123 162 Hydroxide(as CaCO3) 2320E 1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Carbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Bicarbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 1 128 123 162 Total Hardness(as CaCO3) A200.7 1 76.9 78.7 123.0 Chloride A300.0 0.5 10.9 14.5 10.6 '•250/500 Nitrite Nitrogen A300.0 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 1 Nitrate Nitrogen A300.0 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 •10 Phosphate Phosphorous A300.0 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 (orthophosphate) Sulfate A300.0 0.5 31.4 32.1 32.3 •'2501500 Sulfide 4500s2-D 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Total Organic Carbon A413.1 L 0.01 0.22 0.26 1 (unfiltered) Odor Range Low[TON] 2150E NA 0.0 0.0 Odor Range High[TON) 2150E NA 1.0 1.0 Threshold Odor Number[TON] 2150B NA 0.0 0.0 ••3 True Color(filtered) [units] 2120B 3 <3 <3 <3 ••15 Units are in milligrams per liter unless noted. umho/cm micromhos per centimeter ug/L micrograms per liter NA= Not analyzed MCL=Maximum Contaminanat Level =Nitrite+Nitrate(sum as nitrogen) ••Recommended maximum/upper limit 9153-128-sprdsht-hbl 2zon.xls Section 2 Construction and Testing Final Well Construction Final well construction began on October 6, with installation of the casing, screen, and tubing. The final well construction details are listed in Table 3. All screen and casing material was constructed from copper-bearing steel (not less than 0.2% copper). All well casing material was manufactured by the Roscoe Moss Company of Los Angeles, California. The 16-inch diameter screen furnished for this project was Ful Flo shutter-type screen with 0.055-inch by 3-inch slots, 12 slots per circle, 12 circles per foot. The final casing construction consisted of 230 feet of 24-inch diameter, 3/8-inch-thick blank casing; a 5-foot long, 24-inch x 16-inch diameter, 3/8-inch thick reducer; 390.5 feet of 16-inch diameter, 5/16-inch-thick blank casing; and 135 feet of 16-inch diameter, 5/16-inch-thick shutter screen. The total depth of the well is 760.5 feet below ground surface. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee I*1PmA9153.12BkePons\weIIhb121hbiZip 2_6 Section 2 Construction and Testing Table 3 Huntington Beach Well No. 12 Construction Details Borehole Diameters 0 - 23.5 feet 60-inch diameter 23.5 - 200 feet 42-inch diameter 200 - 250 feet 34-inch diameter 250 - 784 feet 28-inch diameter 784 - 807 feet 17.5-inch diameter Casing Wall Interval Length . Diameter Thickness Casing (ft.) (ft.) (in.) (in.) Type 0 - 192 192 36 0.625 Conductor 0 - 230 230 24 3/8 C.B. Blank 230 - 235 5 24 x 16 3/6 C.B. Reducer 235 - 265 30 16 5/16 C.B. Blank 265 - 305 40 16 5/16, 55-Slot C.B. Screen 305 - 365 60 16 5/16 C.B. Blank 365 - 395 30 16 5/16, 55-Slot C.B. Screen 395 - 530 135 16 5/16 C.B. Blank 530 - 545 15 16 5/16, 55-Slot C.B. Screen 545 - 690 145 16 5/16 C.B. Blank 690 - 740 50 16 5/16, 55-Slot C.B. Screen 740 - 760.5 20.5 16 5/16 C.B. Blank with shoe Sounding Tube: 0 - 235 feet 2-inch diameter Gravel Feed Tubes (2): 0 - 3 feet 4-inch diameter Air Vent Tube: 0 - 6 feet 2-inch diameter Gravel Pack: 0 - 755 feet Colorado Silica 8 x 16 Bottom Bentonite Seal 755-767 feet Bentonite Gravel Pack: 767-780 feet Bottom Bentonite Seal 780-782 feet Bentonite Bentonite Seal in 17.5-inch borehole 784-807 feet 1:1 Bentonite/gravel Nota: All screen is Roscoe-Moss Ful Flo Shutter Screen. C.B. = Copper bearing steel CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1AproJ\9153.12eveponskwe11nb1MbI2.ro 2-7 Section 2 Construction and Testing In addition, 235 feet of 2-inch-diameter mild steel sounding tube was attached to the outside of the pump house casing. A 2-inch-diameter mild steel air vent tube was also spliced to the pump house casing at a depth of six feet. Two 4-inch-diameter gravel feed tubes were installed to a depth of three feet. Six sets of centralizers were placed along the outside of the 16-inch casing, in order to ensure that the casing was centered in the borehole. At each set, three centralizers were spaced 120 degrees apart around the casing. Three sets of centralizers were installed on the 24-inch casing. The casing was installed to a depth of 760 feet bgs on October 7. After the casing had been installed, a 1:1 mix of granular bentonite and gravel pack was installed at the depths of 780 to 782 feet bgs and 755 to 767 feet bgs to form a bottom seal using a temporary construction tremie. Gravel pack was installed from 767 to 780 feet bgs to fill a void at the bottom of the hole, using the tremie. Above the bentonite seal, the gravel pack was installed in the annular space between the well casing and borehole wall via the temporary construction tremie. Colorado Silica 8 x 16 gravel pack was placed from the bottom of the borehole (755 feet bgs) to ground surface. Well Development Well development was completed in two phases - mechanical development and development pumping. Mechanical development with the drill rig began on October 8, and continued until October 12. The first section of the 16-inch-diameter screen was airlifted with a single swab in 10- to 20-foot increments to remove fine sediments from the gravel pack and formation, and provide for gravel pack consolidation. Following initial gravel pack consolidation, a double swab was used to further remove fine sediments from the gravel pack. The double swab consisted of an upper and lower rubber disc bracketing an 11.5-foot section of perforated pipe. Air lifting and swabbing continued within each section until the discharge was clear of sediment. When the air-lift discharge cleared, the assembly was moved to the next section of screen and the process repeated, working down the well and then up again. After the screen intervals were swabbed, the double swab was removed and a single swab was re-installed in the well. Approximately 8 feet of fill was airlifted from the bottom of the well with the single swab at the completion of mechanical development. The gravel consolidated approximately 6 feet during swabbing. The time required for mechanical development totaled 66 hours. In preparation for development pumping and well testing, the drill rig was demobilized from the well site. A variable speed, vertical shaft, turbine pump and engine were then brought to the site. The pump was installed in the well on October 16 with the pump bowl assembly set at 220 feet bgs. A discharge pipe was installed in a trench crossing the Rancho Road access to McDonnell Douglas Space Center. The trench was backfilled and covered with asphalt to allow normal auto traffic. The pump discharge was piped to a nearby storm drain. Prior to starting pump development, the static water level was measured at 47 feet bgs. On October 18, pumping began with a rate of 500 gallons per minute (gpm) and was increased to 1,000 gpm for approximately 4 hours until pumping was stopped. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee i-%= I53.12OVepons\wellhbl2\hbl2.rpt 2-8 Section 2 Construction and Testing Pump development resumed on October 19, starting with a flow rate of 800 gpm. As the water cleared, the engine was throttled down and the water in the pump column was allowed to flow back down the pump column and through the well screen (this process is referred to as surging). The well was surged repeatedly in approximate 15-minute cycles until the water remained clear, then the pump rate was increased and the process repeated. This stepwise pump and surge process continued through October 25, up to a discharge rate of 4,570 gpm with a drawdown of 54.2 feet and specific capacity of 82.7 gpm per foot of drawdown. During the final stages of development, the sand content of the discharge water measured 15 minutes after surging ranged from 0 to trace levels of sand. Pump development time totaled 40.5 hours. During pumping, water was discharged to the storm drain near the southeast corner of Bolsa Chica and Rancho Road, via surface pipe. The storm drain led to the Barber City flood control channel which parallels Rancho Road. Discharge water was observed periodically by CDM personnel for water which might have had excessive silt or solids. Well Testing After well development was complete, two aquifer tests were performed:-a step--drawdown test on October 26, and the constant rate discharge and recovery tests from October 30 to November 1. The step drawdown test lasted 8 hours. The well was pumped for two hours at each of four different designed flow rates or steps: 1,525, 2,212, 3,046, and 4,515 gpm. The resultant change in water level (drawdown) was measured using an electric water level indicator. Test results are illustrated graphically on Figure 4, with Table 4 summarizing the maximum drawdown and specific capacity recorded during each step. The raw data are compiled in Appendix E. Table 4 Huntington Beach Well No. 12 Step Drawdown Test Results Discharge Drawdown Specific Capacity (gpm) (feet) (gpm/ft) 1,525 15.28 99.8 2,212 23.81 92.9 3,046 34.46 88.4 40515 54.20 83.3 CDM Camp Dresser & McKee I:�pror9153 12BVepOrlS\wg11hb12V1D12.rp� 2-9 i so SC=83.3 50 / 40 / w Sc=88.4 0 30 / 3 / -, d / � Sc=92.9 20 / co 0' Sc=99.8 10 0 Ln m m N o 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 N rn DISCHARGE (GPM) o_ ti N Sc Specific Capacity 0 a U m N � r n ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT m CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL NO. 12 uj CDM STEP DRAWDOWN TEST RESULTS a= environmental engineers. scientists. Figure 4 a- 'planners. 9 management consultants 9 Section 2 Construction and Testing Specific capacity is a measure of well performance and is equal to the rate of discharge (gpm) divided by the corresponding drawdown (feet). Step drawdown tests are generally used to determine the optimum pumping rate of a well. Based on the test results, the well appeared to be capable of sustaining the preliminary design discharge rate of 3,000 gpm. Following the step drawdown test, a constant rate discharge test was conducted. The duration of the constant rate discharge test was extended from 24 hours to 48 hours. During the test, the flow rate was maintained at approximately 3,000 gpm. The primary purpose of this test was to verify the performance of the well at a discharge rate close to the recommended design discharge. Prior to beginning the constant rate test, the static water level was measured at 52.90 feet bgs. Water levels were measured manually with an electric water level indicator. Water level and discharge measurements are presented in Appendix E. After 48 hours of constant pumping, the maximum drawdown was 37.76 feet, yielding a well specific capacity of 79.08 gallons per minute per foot of drawdown (gpm/ft). After the pump was turned off, the water level in the well was measured during recovery. Drawdown and recovery water level data from Well No. 12 were analyzed using both the semi-log Cooper-Jacob method and the Theis method using a computer program (AQTESOLV), developed by Geraghty & Miller Modeling Group, 1989 (see Appendix E). The average aquifer transmissivity was calculated to be 211,000 gallons per day per foot (gal/day/ft), based on constant discharge test data. Analysis of recovery data by the Jacob method resulted in a transmissivity of 226,000 gal/day/ft. Water quality samples were collected at the end of each step of the step test and 47 hours into the constant discharge test and analyzed for selected general physical and mineral constituents, in addition to color and odor, by the OCWD laboratory. CDM personnel collected the composite sample from a spigot on the pump discharge line. A very slight hydrogen sulfide odor was noted by CDM personnel throughout the constant discharge test. As shown in Table 5 and in Appendix D, the overall water quality in Well No. 12 is good; general mineral analytes were well below State of California Title 22 Drinking Water Standards, where established. Flowmeter Survey A flowmeter "spinner" survey was conducted on November 3, two days after the constant discharge test. The well was pumped at the same rate as the constant discharge test for a period of three hours prior to initiating the spinner survey. Welenco was subcontracted by McCalla to perform the flowmeter survey. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee t:\pro�19153.12BVepons\weilhb121hb12.tpt 2_1 O Table 5 City of Huntington Beach Well No.12 Water Quality Results Summary Step Drawdown Test Constant Discharge Test Analysis Detection Pumping Pumping Pumping Pumping Composite Sample California Constiuent Name Method Limits Ra'e Rate Rate Rate Drinking Water 1500 gpm 2250 gpm 3000 gpm 4500 gpm Standards Electrical Conductivity[umho/cm] 2510E 1.0 511 512 510 507 494 "900/1,600 Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 1.0 270 288 280 276 306 "500/1,000 pH[units) 4500H+B 8.0 8.1 7.9 7.9 8.0 6.5-8.5 Sodium A200.7 0.1 35.7 34.7 35.2 35.5 34.0 Potassium A200.7 0.1 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.7 Magnesium A200.7 0.1 9.7 9.2 9.5 9.5 9.1 Calcium A200.7 0.1 58.5 55.6 55.6 55.6 54.5 Iron[ug/L) A200.7 1.0 59 41 52 130 40 "300 Manganese[ug/L) A200.7 1.0 12 12 12 17 12 50 Total Alkalinity(as CaCO3) 2320B 1.0 166 162 164 161 163 Hydroxide(as CaCO3) 2320E 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Carbonate(as CaCO3) 2320B 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Bicarbonate(as CaCO3) 2320B 1.0 166 162 164 161 163 Total Hardness(as CaCO3) A200.7 1.0 186 177 178 178 173 Chloride A300.0 0.5 29.9 30.3 30.6 29.8 33.6 "250/500 Nitrite Nitrogen A300.0 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 Nitrate Nitrogen A300.0 0.1 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.16 <0.1 10 Phosphate Phosphorous A300.0 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 (orthophosphate) Sulfate A300.0 0.5 42.9 43.6 43.8 43.8 41.9 "250/500 Sulfide 4500s2-D 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Total Organic Carbon A413.11- 0.0 0.35 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.42 (unfiltered) Odor Range Low[TON) 2150B 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Odor Range High[TON] 2150C 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Threshold Odor Number[TON] 2150E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 "3 True Color(filtered)[units) 2120B 3 <3 <3 <3 <3 - "15 Suspended Solids 2540D 1.0 1 1 <1.0 Units are in milligrams per liter unless noted. umho/cm micromhos per centimeter =Nitrite+.Nitrate(sum as nitrogen) ug/L micrograms per liter Recommended maximum/upper limit 9153-128-sprdsht-hb 12step.xis Section 2 Construction and Testing The survey tool was placed inside the well pump house casing. A pumping rate of approximately 3,000 gpm was maintained at Well No. 12 during the flowmeter survey. Both static and dynamic runs were made during the flowmeter survey. Results of the survey are compiled in Table 6 with the data graphically presented on Figure 5. As shown in Table 6, approximately 70 percent of the flow was coming from screened intervals above 400 feet bgs. Copies of the flowmeter survey logs are included in Appendix C. Table 6 Huntington Beach Well No. 12 Flowmeter Survey Test Results Screened Interval Amount of Screen Percent Flow (feet) (feet) 265 - 305 40 44.4 365 - 395 30 26.1 530 - 545 15 7.2 690 - 740 50 22.2 Pumping rate maintained at approximately 3,000 gpm. Straightness Tests, Video Survey, and Chlorination After test pumping activities were completed,.the well was checked for straightness on November 7, 1995. Straightness was evaluated by lowering a 40-foot long dummy pipe with three 15.5-inch-diameter rings through the length of the 16-inch casing, repeating the process using three 23.5-inch-diameter rings through the length of the 24-inch pump house casing. The dummy passed throughout the length of both the well casing and pump house casing. Following the straightness test, the well was chlorinated using approximately 7 bounds of PRO-CARE granular chlorine with 65% available chlorine. The chlorination tool was moved up and down the entire water-filled casing until all the chlorine had dissolved. On November 10, a color VHS-format videolog was performed in the well by McCalla. There were no visual defects observed in the installed well. Following the well video, an alignment test was conducted within the 24-inch pump house casing. The alignment test was conducted by lowering a wire cage down the pump house casing. The cage OD was 1/4-inch smaller than the ID of the 24-inch casing. Measurements were taken every 10 feet to determine the amount of drift from vertical. The results of the alignment test indicated the casing deflected less than 3.5 inches throughout the length of the pump house casing which is within the specified limit of six inches out of vertical for every 100 feet. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee 1:lpoP153-128VeP0 t5\wellhb1Mbl2.gX 2-12 Well Amount of Screened Percent Flow Cumulative Depth Screen Interval Percent Flow (Feet) (Feet) lFeet) 0 50 100 0 50 100 250 I I I I I I 265 40 44.4/ 100i 305 350 365 30 26.1% 55.6% 395 a E _a N 450 M U2 ti Mf O 530 15 ® 545 7.2% 29.4% 550 o c Q c v 0 in m LO 0 N 650 _N D: H J 690 50 22.2% 22.2% 0 740 . N 750 n ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT m CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL NO. 12 M DYNAMIC FLOWMETER SURVEY TEST RESULTS CD M. environmental engineers. scientists. Figure 5 °i planners. 9 management consultants 9 Section 3 Conclusions and Recommendations One groundwater production well was drilled, constructed, developed and tested as part of this project. Well No. 12 was not constructed as deep as originally specified. A total well depth of 1,000 feet was specified in the contract documents, however, due to the presence of colored water known to exist approximately 800 feet bgs, the well was only completed to a depth of 760.5 feet bgs. Also, 580 feet of screen was specified,however, only 135 feet of screen was installed, based on an evaluation of the lithologic and geophysical logs and sieve analyses. As shown in the lithologic log, an abundance of fine-grained materials (i.e., very fine sand, silts,clays, etc.) were present in the borehole. Fine-grained materials are typically not screened because of potential sanding problems and poor yield. The well was installed straight as evidenced by the straightness test in which a dummy pipe passed through the well casing. Well alignment testing resulted in a deflection from vertical of less than 3.5 inches in 230 feet. This deviation is within the specified limits of six inches - per each 100 feet of pump house casing. .- ------------ ------- --------------------- ----------- Results of the groundwater sampling and analyses which were conducted during aquifer zone isolation testing, step testing, and test pumping indicate that the water quality is good. The composite water quality sample collected during the constant discharge test resulted in less than 3 color units, well below the state drinking water standard of 15 units. The well was designed to have low color values based on an evaluation of historic water quality data from the OCWD multiport monitoring well SBM-1 and the Huntington Beach Well No. 4. Color is not anticipated to be a concern, however, a change in hydraulic conditions (i.e., water levels, gradients, etc.) in the area in the future may result in a change in water quality. Although a very slight hydrogen sulfide odor was noted throughout the constant discharge test, the resulting threshold odor number was 0,below the state drinking water standard of 3. Treatment does not appear to be necessary based on these results. However, if the apparent slight odor is higher than indicated in the sample results or increases over time, treatment may be necessary. Further research would have to be conducted to determine the best methods of treatment. Well performance was tested by conducting both a step test and a long-term pumping test. Results of the pump test analyses along with the recommended pump setting and rate are as follows: Transmissivity calculated to be between 211,000 and 226,000 gpd/ft Specific capacity = 79 gpm/ft (after 48 hours of pumping at 2,986 gpm) Recommended pumping rate = 3,000 gpm Recommended pump setting = 200 feet bgs within the 24 inch pump house casing CDM Camp Dresser &McKee I.VMP9153.1281repoft\wellhb121hb12.rM 3-1 Section 3 Conclusions and Recommendations A flowmeter survey was performed in the well. The results of the flowmeter survey indicated that 30 percent of the total flow was produced from the lowest screened intervals between 530-740 feet.. The remaining 70 percent of flow was produced from the two upper- most screened intervals between 265 and 395 feet. CDM Camp Dresser&McKee MprWIss-IaVepcft\v*IftI hbI2.rO 3-2 r a4� �1 y1 t F SS , xm APPENDIX A LITHOLOGIC LOGS BOREHOLE LOG HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL#12 Project: 9153-128-CS-REP2 Pagel of 9 Depth (feet) Lithology Description Comments 0 - 10 Sand - gray, fine to medium grain, gap No sample taken. graded, loose, damp, <5% silt, no gravel, 95% sand. 10 - 19 Sandy, Clayey Silt - strong brown, poorly No sample taken - wet at graded, fine, soft, moist (wet ® 15 ft), 20% 15 ft. sand, 80% silt/clay. 19 - 27 Silt - olive gray (SY 4/2); few sand, trace, gravel, low plasticity. 27 - 38 Clay - olive gray (5Y 4/2), high plasticity, sticky, cohesive . 38 - 40 Clay - olive gray (5Y 4/2), high plasticity, sticky, cohesive, soft. 40 - 45 Clay - olive brown (2.5Y 4/4), few sand (approx. 5%); moderate to high plasticity; clumpy consistency. 45 - 50 Clay - light olive brown (2.5Y 5/4) with brownish yellow splotches, few sand (approx. 5%), moderate to high plasticity, f sticky, cohesive. e 50 - 56 Clay and Gravel - light olive brown (2.5Y 5/4); approx. 60% clay, 40% gravel; sticky clay; gravel is cemented; 10% sand medium to large, angular. 56 -70 Clay - grayish brown (2.5Y 5/2),very high plasticity, few pebbles, sticky. 70 - 78 Sand - olive gray (5Y 4/2) with traces of clay; poorly graded. 78 - 85 Clay - olive gray (5Y 4/2) high plasticity with trace sand, sticky. 85 - 94 Sand - mottled color, poorly graded; traces of olive gray (5Y 5/2) clay. 94 - 102 Clay - dark gray (5Y 4/1); high plasticity, sticky; trace sand. 102 - 113 Sandy Silt - olive.gray (5Y 4/2); very wet. 11prOM 153.128\repons\wellhbl2\wellhbl2.lop BOREHOLE LOG HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL #12 Project: 9153-128-CS-REP2 Page 2 of 9 Depth (feet) Lithology Description Comments 113 - 123 Clay - dark gray (5Y 4/1); sticky; very moderate to high plasticity. 123 - 132 Clay - dark gray (5Y 4/1) dense, fat clay, very high plasticity; low water content. 132 - 134 Clay - dark gray (5Y 4/1), few fine sand and (Resume drilling) silt, sticky, cohesive, high plasticity, dense, 1935 hrs firm chunks. approx. 129 feet. 134 - 137 Sand - multi-colored grains, medium to coarse sand, trace of silt; predominantly coarse sand, well graded with pebbles, trace to no fines, subrounded to angular. <10% to medium pebble gravel angular to subround. 137 - 150 Sand - multi-colored grains, with olive gray Kelly down ® 146.35 fine sand, trace to no fines, subrounded to 1957 hrs rounded, well graded with pebbles medium to coarse grain. <10% to medium pebble gravel angular to subround. 150 - 160 Sand - multi-colored medium to coarse grain with pebbles, few fine grain sand, trace silt, subangular to rounded, well graded. <10% to medium pebble gravel angular to subround. 160 - 168 Sand - multi-colored, medium to coarse- Kelly down Q 166.2 grained (predominantly coarse), with olive- 2030 hrs. gray fine sand and silt, well graded, subangular to subrounded, trace very fine pebble gravel, trace shell fragment. 168 - 176 Sand - multicolored, medium to large grain, Shell fragments. few fine grains, with shells and pebbles, trace Took full 8 feet to collect silt, well graded, subangular to subrounded. small sample (possibly noncohesive clay or silt base). 176 - 186 Sand and Gravel - gray (2.5Y 5/1) pebbles Shell fragments. Took and coarse sand with shell pieces, clay balls full 10 feet to half fill intermittent, subangular to subrounded, well sample bag (possibly graded, pasty silt base. noncohesive clay or silt base). 1:1pMP 153.1 Wrepon Awellhb I Zwellhb 12.1op BOREHOLE LOG HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL #12 Project: 9153-128-CS-REP2 Page 3 of 9 Depth (feet) Lithology Description Comments 186 - 196 Silt with Gravel - dark gray (5Y 4/1), few Took full 10 feet for coarse grain sand and pebbles. Liquidy small sample (possibly (pasty), low cohesive. noncohesive clay or silt base). 196 - 206 Silt with Gravel - dark gray (5Y 4/1), trace coarse grain sand and gravel, pasty, low cohesion. 206 - 211 Silty Sand - dark gray (7.5 YR N/4), very fine to coarse sand, poorly graded, abundant mica. 211 - 221 Sand - interbedded by Clay - dark gray (7.5 YR N/4); very fine to fine sand, predomi- nately fine sand poorly graded, trace shell fragments, abundant mica; a lot of clay in shaker box but little to no clay in canister sampler, interbedded with clay, dark gray (7.5 YR N/4), dry, highly plastic, soft, trace root debris. 221 -231 Sand interbedded with Clay - as above. Mud test Vis = 30 sec/qt wt = 9.2 lbs/gal % sand = 2% 231 - 239 Sand interbedded with Clay - as above Sample retrieval device except no shell fragments. changed to collect more representative samples. 239 -248 Sand interbedded with Sandy Gravel -brown (7.5YR 5/2) with multicolored clasts; sand very fine to very coarse, predominantly medium-grained, poorly graded, angular, trace clay balls; sandy gravel - 40% sand, 60% gravel; gravel angular to subangular; low sphericity, trace rounded pebble, very fine pebble to coarse pebble, predominantly fine pebble. 248 - 258 Sand interbedded with Sandy Gravel - as above except coarse, not medium gravel. 258 - 272 Clay - very dark gray, (10YR 3/1), highly plastic, dry, large clay balls. MpronB I53.1281reporlslwellhb I2%wellhb I2.lop BOREHOLE LOG HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL #12 Project: 9153-128-CS-REP2 Page 4 of 9 Depth (feet) Lithology Description Comments 272 - 282 Sand interbedded with Sandy Gravel - brown (7.5 YR 5/2) with multicolored clasts; sand very fine to very coarse, predominantly medium-grained, poorly graded, angular, trace clay balls; sandy gravel - 40% sand, 60% gravel; gravel angular to subangular; low sphericity, trace rounded pebble, very fine pebble to coarse pebble, predominantly fine pebble. 282 - 289 Sand interbedded with Sandy Gravel, as above. 289 - 293 Clay with Gravel and Shell Fragments - olive Shell fragment. gray (5Y 5/1). 293 - 29S Clay with Gravel and Sand - olive gray (5Y Shell fragments. 5/1) with multicolored clasts; 40% clay, 40% coarse sand, 20% gravel; well graded, angular, large clay balls; gravel is angular to subangular with shell fragments. 298 - 304 Sand - grayish brown (2.5Y 5/2) with multicolored clasts; 90% sand 5% clay, 5% gravel. Sand is medium to coarse-grained, poorly graded, trace clay balls and shell fragments; some gravel, angular to subangular. 307 - 321 Clay - dark gray (2.5Y 4/1), plastic very sticky, stiff. 321 - 327 Interbedded Sand and Clay - dark gray, (5Y 4/1); 70% sand 30% clay; sand is fine to medium-grained, poorly-graded, multicolored; clay is sticky and plastic- 2 colors: gray and black. Clay is in balls, medium sized. 327 - 334 Silty Sand with some Clay - olive gray (5Y 4/2); 60% sand 40% silt; medium stiffness, non-plastic; sand is fine-grained, poorly- graded. Trace clay, gray and sticky, plastic. 334 - 342 Clay - dark gray (2.5Y 4/1), plastic, medium stiffness, sticky, no odor. t*o19153-12B4epons%wellhb 12%welthb 12.1op BOREHOLE LOG HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL #12 Project: 9153-128-CS-REP2 Page 5 of 9 Depth (feet) Lithology Description Comments 342 - 347 Clay and Sand - dark gray, (5Y 4/1); 50% sand, 50% clay; sand fine to medium-grained, poorly-graded, rounded with medium sphericity; clay is sticky and plastic, no odor. 347 - 351 Sand - olive gray (5Y 5/2); 95% sand/5% gravel; medium-grained, poorly-graded, multicolored clasts; trace gravel, angular to subangular, trace clay balls. 351 - 362 Clay - olive gray, (5Y 5/2), slightly sticky, very plastic, stiff, dry to damp. 362 - 367 Sandy Clay - very dark gray, (5Y 3/1); 80% clay, 20% sand; clay is sticky and dark, trace olive clay; sand is fine to medium-grained. 367 - 370 Sand - gray (2.5Y 5/1); poorly graded, fine sand with trace clay; rounded, medium sphericity, multicolored clasts. 370 - 375 Sand - olive gray (5Y 4/2); medium to coarse-grained sand, poorly- graded, multicolored clasts, rounded, medium sphericity. 375 - 387 Sand - as above with some trace gravels. 387 - 399 Sand - as above. 399 - 403 Sandy Clay - gray (2.5Y 5/1); 95% clay, 5% sand; plastic, sticky, firm, no odor. 403 - 407 Sandy Clay - same as above with increasing sand content; 85% clay, 15% sand. 407 - 416 Interbedded Clay and Sand with Shell Shell fragments. Fragments - gray (2.5Y 5/1); 60% sand, 40% clay; sand is fine-grained to medium, poorly- graded; clay is sticky and plastic, some clay balls are dense and firm; shell fragments. 416 - 427 Silty Sand with Shell Fragments - dark gray Shell fragments. (2.5Y 4/1); 70% sand, 30% silt; fine-grained sand, poorly graded; non-plastic, shell fragments. 1:1proA9153-1281reports%wel lhb 12\wel lhb 12.lop BOREHOLE LOG HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL #12 Project: 9153-128-CS-REP2 Page 6 of 9 Depth (feet) Lithology Description Comments 427 - 440 Sand with some Clay - gray (2.5Y 6/1); 8% fine sand, 15% clay/silt; poorly-graded, fine- grained, round, medium sphericity; clay is stiff and plastic and sticky. 440 - 447 Clayey Sand with Shell Fragments - gray Shell fragments (2.5Y 5/1); 70% sand, 30% clay; sand is fine to medium-grained, poorly-graded; clay is gray with some rust colored balls. Gray clay is stiff but brittle; rust clay is sticky and plastic, shell fragments. 447 - 453 Silty Clay - dark gray (5Y 4/1); 85% clay, 15% silt; plastic and stiff. 453 - 459 Silty Clay - as above with increasing silt content; 75% clay, 25% silt. 459 - 467 Silty Clay - as above with increasing silt content; 65% clay, 35% silt; some rust-colored clay chunks, some plastic and sticky and some stiff, dry and brittle. 467 - 472 Sandy Clay- dark gray (5Y 4/1); 60% clay, 40% sand; sand is fine-grained, poorly- graded; multicolored clasts; clay is massive and stiff, plastic, slightly sticky. 472 - 478 Clayey Sand - dark gray (5Y 4/1), 85% sand, 15% clay; sand is fine-grained, poorly graded, rounded with moderate sphericity; clay is plastic. 478 - 487 Silty Clay - dark gray (5Y 4/1); 80% clay, 20% silt; plastic, soft and slightly sticky. 487 -494 Sandy Silt- very dark gray (5Y 3/1), 80% silt, 20% sand; non-plastic, medium to fine sand, no odor. 494 - 500 Sandy Clay - very dark gray (5Y 3/1), 85% clay, 15% sand; no laminations, sand is medium-;grained and angular. 500 - 507 Sandy Silt - very dark gray (5Y 3/1), 80% silt, 20% sand; non-plastic, medium to fine sand, no odor. 1:\pto\81 S:i-12BVepOrts\wellhbl2\we11hb12.lOg BOREHOLE LOG HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL #12 Project: 9153-128-CS-REP2 Page 7 of 9 Depth (feet) Lithology Description Comments 507 - 517 Clay - mottled, very dark gray (5Y 3/1) and olive (5Y 5/4); plastic, gray portion is very sticky, olive portion is dry, friable, trace fine sand. 517 - 520 Clay - as above. 520 - 525 Clay and Wood - very dusky red (10R 2.5/2); Wood; has HZS odor - 50% clay, 50% wood; strong odor when large sharp color change. pieces are broken open, wood chips up to 1 inch diameter. 525 - 535 Silty Clay - dark gray (5Y 4/1), plastic, approximately 30% silt, stiff. 535 - 537 Interbedded Sand and Clay - dark gray (5Y 4/1); 50% sand, 50% clay, as above; sand is fine to medium grained, rounded, medium sphericity; poorly graded (0.5 mm), silty (approx 5%). 537 - 540 Clayey Sand - multicolored sand, clay is as above (interbedded approx. 10%) well-graded sand, silt to coarse sand, subround, moderate sphericity. 540 - 545 Silty Sand - olive (5Y 4/3); 70% sand, 30% silt; fine to medium sand well-graded, subangular, medium sphericity. 545 - 565 Sand - olive (5Y 4/3); poorly-graded fine sand, round, medium sphericity, trace clay stringers. 565 - 567 Clayey Sand - olive (5Y 4/3); 65% sand, 35% clay; sand is fine to medium-grained, poorly graded; clay is gray and rust colored, plastic and stiff; some silt. 567 - 587 Sand with large Clay balls; olive (5Y 4/4); fine-grained, poorly-graded sand, multicolored clasts; clay is massive balls, stiff and friable. 587 - 597 Sand with Clay - as above with smaller and fewer clay balls. 1:lOroMI.A3.128VeDorts%wellhbl2%wellhb/2.lo j BOREHOLE LOG HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL #12 Project: 9153-128-CS-REP2 Page 8 of 9 Depth (feet) Lithology Description Comments 597 - 607 Silty Sand - dark olive gray (5Y 3/2); 85% sand, 15% silt; plastic; sand is fine-grained, poorly-graded, rounded. �. 607 - 617 Silty Clay - olive gray (5Y 5/2); 85% clay, 15% silt; plastic; massive clay balls, gray, stiff and brittle. 617 - 630 Silty Clay - as above with increased silt content; 60% clay, 40% silt; plastic and sticky, small plastic clay balls, sticky. 630 - 647 Sand - olive gray (5Y 4/2); fine-grained, poorly graded, multicolored clasts, rounded, medium sphericity. 647 - 657 Silty Clay - olive gray (5Y 4/2); 80% clay, 20% silt; clay is mostly plastic with dark gray chunk of clay that is firm and brittle. 657 - 667 Silty and Clay; olive gray (5Y 4/2 ); 50% silt, 50% clay; very plastic and sticky. 667- 676 Sandy Clay; olive gray (5Y 4/2) 80% clay, 20% sand; clay is stiff, slightly plastic, moderately sticky; sand is fine to medium- grained, poorly graded. ' 676 - 687 Sand - olive (5Y 4/3); sand is fine to medium-grained, poorly graded, rounded, medium sphericity with multicolored clasts. 687 - 697 Sand - as above except more fine sands with less medium-grained sands. 697- 703 Sand - olive (5Y 5/4); medium to fine- grained sand, poorly graded with multicolored clasts, rounded with sphericity. 703 - 713 Sand - as above except medium to coarse- grained sand. 713 - 721 Sand - as above. 721 - 730 Sand - as above with some Gravels - 95% sand, 5% gravel; sand is medium to coarse sand; gravel is angular to subangular. I.VrOA9159-128VepbrtSNWOIlhbi 2\wellhbl2.log BOREHOLE LOG HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL #12 Project: 9153-128-CS-REP2 Page 9 of 9 Depth (feet) Lithology Description Comments 730 - 740 Sand with Gravel - olive gray (5Y 5/2); 80% sand, 15% gravel, 5% clay; clay balls massive, hard and brittle, gray; sand is medium to coarse-grained, well-graded, multicolored; gravel is subangular to angular, some cobbles, well graded. 740•- 747 Sand with Gravel - as above except no clay; 85% coarse to medium sand, 15% gravel. 747- 755 Sand with some Gravel - dark gray (2.5Y 5/1); fine-grained, poorly-graded, rounded, medium sphericity; gravels are large and sparse, angular to subangular. 755 - 767 Sand - dark gray (2.5Y 5/1); some shell Shell fragments. fragments; fine to medium-grained, poorly graded, rounded, dark colored clasts, trace clay balls. 767 - 776 Interbedded Sand and Clay - dark gray (2.5Y 5/1); 50% sand, 50% clay; fine-grained sand, poorly graded, dark colored clasts; clay medium plasticity, moderately stiff and sticky. 776 - 782 Sand - olive gray (SY 4/2); sand is fine to medium-grained, poorly-graded, multicolored clasts, rounded with medium sphericity. 782 - 787 Sand with Gravel - olive gray (5Y 4/2); 60% sand, 40% gravel; sand is medium to coarse- grained, well graded, multicolored clasts, gravels are cobbles to pebble sized, subangular to angular. 787 - 797 Sand with Gravel - as above. 797- 807 Sand - olive gray (5Y 4/2); medium to Total depth of drilling is coarse-grained sand, poorly sorted, 807 feet below ground multicolored clasts. surface. 1.\pml al53.12B4eports\wellhbl2\wellhb 12.lop i xm y yyNy25 a � U,Op. ........... a } , r i t t ','r 7 I•fear t�, �'7�,z��.w �.ire( "�f'� ah dd*'+;' ,.4.^ . '. r, w x r. ';s },;;•a•�S'F.�y, 14,�"',,��f,�ki a�'tie��,ryaa',�,:�1��"�v:� � � ``4iJ a ,> �•iy.�f�'s `r�! 'nfY.` �.+e,�r* �s:urf�� ............i c zs Y( } r at �k'� sF X �bY ad APPENDIX B SIEVE ANALYSES WELL NO. B JV- Z DATE Z7 INTERVALS 37C -37 A- LOCATION SLQXI. BY SAMPLE TYPE: DQ Formation 0 Gravel Pack OA/OC C3 Design Gravel Pack U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 209A00 70 50 40 30 20 16 14 12 10 8 6 901 80F . --- - i---- - _ - ;- -- - - - uj z 70 ui It _ z -60 _ U - - - — -- i-, ——j- - - -- -;- -- I-- -- a50 - --t- - -- -- - - -- — - -, 40 - L. -- _ _ _77 _ V __ — --- _ _ — -- -J i!— --,. 30-7 20 - - -- -, -- - - -7- _ -7-- • — _ i 1 _�_i_— I ��I I ----- _ i 1 —I i I I 1 I , 1_ -I 1_= _ _ _ _ _ _ i_ , _ _ _. 01 - r 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 IN. 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 MM. SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. sat opening "Ieheeval °iMrvd x INTERVAL: rC' 311 S Sieve Cum.Weight Cum.% Cum.Weight Cum. NO. IN. MM Retained t Relalned DRY START WEIGHT(g): �Z 6 0.132 3.36 • 1 8 0•094 2.38 DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET �3.Z 10 0.079 2.00 -S- G IQ SIEVE WITH NO.200 SIEVE (g): 12 0.066 1.s6 T' +0 e 14 0.055 1.40 T OP e INTERVAL: 6wQ 16 0.047 1.19 o�C•L DRY START WEIGHT(g): f 30 0.023 0.60 Z 40 0.016 0.42 DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET so 0.012 0.30 o A t SIEVE WITH NO. 200 SIEVE (g): 70 1 0.008 1 0.21 3 7 100 0.006 0.15 O COMMENTS: 200 0.003 0.08 t 00, (&0- CDM SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT environmental engineers,scientists, planners,6 management consultants WELL NO. a �2 DATE 5f Zz/45 INTERVALS CI LOCATION _ �1O `' Spt� � BY j�w1eS !9' E SAMPLE TYPE: 4114 Fomlation Gravel Pack QA/QC C3 Design Gravel Pack U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS ' 100 10o 70 50 40 30 20 16 14 12 10 8 6 I I I —i �_ --�- -•- ' — -- 1 ----- - --- 90 - 80 ' p i I - , -{ 1' 1 J . Z —• 70 a : ' w cc W _ - -- - - W - i_ .___ _�. _ -i i I- —_ _�—I-' ;iI- 1. CL 50 - 1 -- - - - r , 30 - 20 FF 11 �'- I ---i r — - 11�—••_--__' 10 1 1 , _ 1 I I •_- I I •— _ __ _ I I I I -77! -7-1 �- -- ---- 0 0 10 20 .30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 1 IN. 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 mm. SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. tM.ry.l U.S. sot Openinga 1mwVw X INTERVAL: 07 Q E—3r37 sieve Cum.wool Cum.% Cum.wool Cum.% No. IN. MM Retained Retalned DRY START WEIGHT(g): 6 0.132 3.36 8 0.094 2.38 0 0 DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET I 10 0.079 .00 �L 0 -0 SIEVE WITH NO.200 SIEVE (g): 2-0 1- 0.066 1.68 q O 0 l 14 0.05S 1.4 0 0 • INTERVAL: 3 — 33�� 16 0.047 1 1.19 0 0 0 C DRY START WEIGHT(g): D 30 0.023 0.60 Aq.0 40 0.015 0:42 DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET so 0.012 0.30 1 •l SIEVE WITH NO. 200 SIEVE (g): 70 1 0.008 0.21 q Z b 19, 6 1o0 0.006 0.15 tOl 0 315 COMMENTS: 200 0.003 0.08 I?�0 0 CDM SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT environmental engineers,scientists, planners,&management consultants WELL NO.. . Z- DATE �2-3 � INTERVALS3 — LOCATION '0�O r` BY ' 1 SAMPLE TYPE: I,�Formation C3 Gravi)l Pack OA/QC 0 Design Gravel Pack U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 .100 70 50 40 30 20 16 14 12 10 8 g 90 so - 7- - 70 z t30 - Lu - - ; a 50 1- - -_ i- _ — 77.i. _— - _i `i- "i-7 -o r- - Q — - — - --- --- - -- _- - .---- -- - --- —_�_- - 40. 30 - - - -- ; -- - -- ---- - i i--;;i- - . - - - 20 10 - -- - 1 - --- — - _ i -----I - 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 ?0 0 90 100 110 120 1 0 IN. i 1 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. . Slot opening "1i"""•1 a Imemw x INTERVAL: S14 S - 56S Steve Cum.Weight Cum.% Cum.Weight Cum.% No. IN. MM 1 Retained r Retained DRY START WEIGHT(g): 6 _ 6 0.132 3.36 0 a 0.094 2.38 0 0 o DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET 1s/ 10 0.079 .00 0 0 SIEVE WITH NO.200 SIEVE (g): 44 i 0.066 1.68 D 14 0,055 1.40 • 2 a INTERVAL: 16 0.047 1.19 L 4 L 30 0.023 0.60 ( DRY START WEIGHT(g): �0 40 0.016 0.42 L4 l a5,3 DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET so 0.012 0.30 0. 3 SIEVE WITH NO. 200 SIEVE (g): 17� 9 70 0.008 1 0.21 54-3 nL i I Y 100 0.006 0.15 ~ -]Z, /` — I 1 COMMENTS: 200 0.003 0.08 I CDM SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT envrronmentel engineBrs, scientists, planners,a management consultants WE:L'NO. �Q- DATE 4IL3I�5 x��t, - INTERVALS -o -y 7 z -L4�-1 T S LOCATION R-AfW RcStE BY -y SAMPLE TYPE: KForrnation 0 Gravel Pack QA/OC Design Gravel Pack U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 00 70 50 40 30 20 16 14 1 12 10 8 6 90 - 80 - - - w • ---n--L- 70�— ' z 60 LU —77 Uj CL 507-7-77 40 30 _ 20 17 — �--- -,-��. #E-f 10 EEF 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100- 110 120 13 IN. 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 MM. SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. Slot Opening : Interval e 1iewv•l x INTERVAL: q ` y Z7 Steve Cum.Weight Cum.% Cum.Weight Cum.% No. 1N• MM Retained Retained DRY START WEIGHT(g): J~� 6 0.132 3.36 q 6, 0 a 0.094 2.38 ID-13 1 o D DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET 10 0.079 2.00Is-lb 1 0 O SIEVE WITH NO.200 SIEVE (g): 13� 12 0.0% 1.68 , O O 14 0.055 1.40 •s rs INTERVAL: q 7z 7 16 0.047 1.19 Zb •O 20 1�0-o '3 4 DRY START WEIGHT(g): 113 t 30 0.023 0.60 1• 40 0.016 0.42 DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET b>q so 0.012 0.30 0 SIEVE WITH NO. 200 SIEVE (g): 70 0.008 0.21 7 L }(_ S !t 100 o.00s a1s 1, COMMENTS: 200 0.003 G.08 110 1 too-o CDM SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT environmental engineers,scientists, planners,6 management consultants .-... WELL NO. � DATE 2 �i�� INTERVALS LOCATION ; S " BY •u0�"u ICL`LL SAMPLE TYPE: XFormation O Gravel Pack QA/QC C3 Design Gravel Pack U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 200 100 70 50 40 30 20 16 14 12 10 8 6 1'00 _ 90 _ 80 .......... Z 70 - - _._ - - -- -- - —. I I _ W -. . .i _ i -- - z 60 50 _-- -_ � - .-- _1. _-- - � -- � --L-1-- -•�_.�`- ' 40 ;- - -- - --— — - 30 J-DTI I i i,=: 10 --- --- -.-= 0 0 t0-- _- 20 30 1 40 50=- 60 70 80 90 100 - 110 120� 130 IN. 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 MM. SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. Us, slot opening z Ito.aa' ° tM«r.1 x INTERVAL: 3(02L 3f-7 / Steve Cum.Weight Cum.% Cum.Weight Cum.% No IN. MM Retained t Retained DRY START WEIGHT(g): 11 6 0.132 3.36 16 1(, 1 .66 6 0.094 2.38 Cl i DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET 10 o:079 — 1 2A SIEVE WITH NO.200 SIEVE (g): let 12 0.066 1.68 2 •$ 14 0.055 1.40 )IS • INTERVAL: 3W7-310 16 0.047 1.19 1-19 2.9 41 S' DRY START WEIGHT(g): 30 0.023 0.60 •�{L 40 0.016 0.42 •!o DRY WEIGHT.AFTER WET 5o 0.012 0.30 17. 14q-3o SIEVE WITH NO. 200 SIEVE ) 70 0.008 0.21 L `S V Cl 5 6 2.03 x-114w:.• w CC- ru.Lf:w;.rc t .� too 0.006 0.15 i 1 COMMENTS: - ( raWt t.d 200 0.003 0.08 Q •'1 Ll I 3 CDM SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT :environmental engineers, scientists, planners,&management consultants WELL NO. DATE INTERVALS LOCATION BY SAMPLE TYPE:4n Formation 0 Gravel Pack OA/OC C3 Design Gravel Pack U.S.STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 200,100 70 50 40 30 20 16 14 12 10 8 6 I -77- 77- 7 90 .7 _7 80 r 7' i w z 70- w J I L z 60 --- w J- -7 7'. T- cc w 7 4 cL 50-1 F 7 w L --77-7- r L 1 7 7 7 7- ---r, T I L) r .30 F7r 7-1 Ifni I 20 1 7-tj -T 7' 7 1 : T 10 -L' 7 7 7 - 7 7-71 -F-, t 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 IN. 0! ' '5 10 15- 2.0 2!5 3!0 MM. SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. Slot Opening x Irdeftel a lntavw x INTERVAL: -2-28- 307 Sieve Cum.woof Cum.% Cum.woof cum.% No. IN. I MM Retained- --Retalned DRY START WEIGHT(g): 6 0.132 3.36 7 a 0.094 2.38 t L t 3. DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET .......... 10 0.079 2.00 ( 3-2 SIEVE WITH NO.200 SIEVE (g): 12 0.066 1.68 12.0 17 14 0.055 1.40 -2-Z- 1%.41 o INTERVAL: 16 0.047 1.19 20 22 0,033 0.84 7-q DRY START WEIGHT(g): 30 0.023 0.60 35.5 40 0.016 0.42 51 (A q DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET so 12 0.30 -71 4-5 SIEVE WITH NO. 200 SIEVE (g): 70 0.008 0.21 'R 2- 100 0.006 0.15 106 CA p COMMENTS: 200 0.003 0.08 1 100 CDM environmental engineers,scientists, SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT planners,6 management consultants �y �c 362^SL7 WELL NO. 5� y DATE 'S 5 INTERVALS -• LOCATION BY ) <�"� SAMPLE TYPE: P Formation C3 Gravel Pack OA/OC 0 Design Gravel Pack U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 200 100 70 50 40 30 20 16 14 12 10 8 6 -90 , - 1 J. 80 1 - f i . 1 ' ! 1 � � I 70 I _. .. 1 i_ i fL - Z 60 I I 1. I Cr - -- - - - I W - �- =-- - - — - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - d -50 -'--' , '-- i .••i-I -- � r i 1"-•1• 1 i.. , I I , -I _1-J_- �'_ 2- -!—I 1 I I I I_- I 40 30 - -- - -- -- - , I I .�! _.ice. ' ' ' ' -- I _ 1 fI-I-� _ 1 J__...! -' ' ' - •- - - - `-- I I i ! I !_ l i I i I T�I _�I I i_ _I-I I -- _ _ 20 T-L r I I I 1 I _- I 10 - ,; '--'I-- J ' _ •-1...'-._--_•-_---1- I_ I f __ - 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 - 90 100 - 110 — 120 130 IN. 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 MM. SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. -� U.S. Slot Opening :IMON&I o IMmv.l X INTERVAL: G Z- 0/7 '� L Sieve Cum.Weight Cum.% Cum.Weight Cum.% No. IN. MM Retained Retained DRY START WEIGHT(g): a5iev-k - 6 0.132 1 3.36 116t O O e 0.094 2.3e o DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET n 10 0.07s 00 Z z 2.5 SIEVE WITH NO,200 SIEVE (g): a 1 0.066 1.68 14 0.055 1.40 •z6 `� o INTERVAL: 16 0.047 1.19 7- 9 Is .5 / '3 $ 191 16 10 DRY START WEIGHT(g): 30 0.023 0.60 U 9 Z 40 0.016 0.42 40 60 16 30 DRY WEIGHT AFTER WET r 50 0.012 0.30 •72- 7- "7D SIEVE WITH NO, 200 SIEVE (g): 70 0.008 0.21 Z z Ck 8 G '� 100 0.006 0.15 8 2-o COMMENTS: 200 0.003 0.08 q2 I qf 1 IC46 1 100 CDM environmental engineers,scian6sts, SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT planners,&management consultants i Gravel Pack Design Gravel Pack QA/QC i SIEVE ANALYSIS JOB No. DATE LOCATION BY SAMPLE TYPE INTERVAL e U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 100 70 50 40 30 20 16 12 10 8 6 77-7 80 -- - — -- _ i ' `- -- --- ---- ui 70 IL .T. T I . I T' - - -- > 1 1 i_ i � I I J_- - I I I I -�i i -� I 1 1 � •-- _��-� , I 30 i ! 1 �I- j•T I 1 I 11 1 _1 1-77 1 i i , f TTI i I 1 20 - i - 1 ! !Ti 11 I _ I I 1 i ! I 1 I 10 I 1 : 1 If 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I , 1 I I I I 1 1 I - i 1 I 71 I • O 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 10 80 90 100 t10 120 130 IN. 1 1 I i 1 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 MM SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. SLOT OPENIN �x;a ETAINED COMMENTS SIEVE NO. IN. MM D d 6 0.132 3.36 — 8 0.094 2.38 10 0.079 2.00 1 -L -Z3 y6 12 0.066 1 1.68 y S S U I' U 11W 0.047 1.19 $ 9S l70 ( V I 2$ 0.033 0.84 D I 9,0� t V 1 19/6 30 0.023 10.60 40 0.016 0.42 50 0.012 0.30 70 0.008 0.21 100 0.006 0.15 200 0.003 0.08 SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT CAMP DRESSER & McKE SIEVE ANALYSIS JOB No. DATE LOCATION t&464Mk 2 BY _hj?!WALr,� SAMPLE TYPE INTERVAL U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 100 70 50 40 30 0 16 12 10 8 6 1 , , 90 —-- - -- 7 0 uj z 60 1 - T:' -r �-1-- 1 -` lilt I I - - - CL 50 40 30 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 20 1 1 I 1 , 1- 1 1 1 I ! • I _ - 10 1 t 1 1 _ 1 0 0 10 20 ' 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 IN. 0.5• 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 MM SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. SLOT OPENING RETAINED COMMENTS SIEVE NO. IN. I MM O 2 kkt 6 0.132 13.36 � 8 0.094 2.38 jLf 10 0.079 2.00 12 0.066 1.68 -1 t t,6 2 3 l �iG 0.047 1.19 IUJI - Um �-2 53 0.033 0.84 I 6 FS �p 0.023 0.60 20p Oa 4�, 40 0.016 0.42 Izo •p 50 0.012 0.30 70 0.008 0.21 100 0.006 0.15 200 jO.003 0.08 . SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT CAMP DRESSER & McKE SIEVE ANALYSIS JOB No. 11w'� DATE LOCATION �� ' -�l 12— BY SAMPLE TYPE ( INTERVAL t U.S.STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 100 70 50 40 30 20 16 I`� 12 10 8 6 90 80 t�i Ai �-- uj W70 IT -- - I - - �_ -I- - - �- -I ' - --. W C i CL ui C 40 177 77, 1 I I I + ' I T 1 1 I •-j-1 _ V 1 1 30 ' ' - 20 _!-i I 1 1l- 1 1 1 71 7 I I r l r - 10 • I _ I t I , 1 1 _ ; I 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 _I � ; 1 . 1 � , 1 1 _ 1 i l i l I I11 O 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I + 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 10 80 90 100 110 120 130 IN. 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 MM SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. SLOT OPENIN RETAINED COMMENT SIEVE tw%NO. IN. MM 3 W y Cw r 6 0.132 3.36 p J 8 0.094 2.38 TrZ Z-y 10 0.079 2.00 1 9 L 2( 5,0 z �O 12 0.066 1.68 1 CD 50 1 1 z 56 100- 0.047 1.19 170 35 I62ff 0.033 0.84 b 6 v -W36- 10.023 0.60 2pp 16b 2G0 /00 40 0.016 0.42 50 0.012 0.30 70 0.008 0.21 100 0.006 0.15 200 0.003 0.08 SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT CAMP DRESSER & McKE SIEVE ANALYSIS JOB No. DATE LOCATION 2"f� pr BY SAMPLE TYPE �ra 1 g-cl< INTERVAL U.S.STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 100 70 50 40 30 20 16 (l 12 10 8 6 I _ 1 80 17 O - -- - ]--- -,--- - - ; - - -- - uj a 70 — — -- —-� - — - --- Lilt cr 60 I- - T- ill i 1 i —-i ^ i� i , 1 , ' , I I 1 -'fit- I • I , ; '..� . . 1 1 1 1 j IT 1 1 1 I Wso177--- - _ 40 V 30IIIit ; 20 ; -- I 11 - I I 1 : I I 1��' _:i - 1 1 1 1 1 I I I t 'I-- t I 1 1 1 1 10 1 1 1 1 1 I ! 71 II I� 0 0 10 20 30 40 SO 601 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 IN. I 1 1 0.5 • 1.0 3.5 2.0 _ 2.1 5 3.0 MM SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. SLOT OPENING RETAINED COMMENTS SIEVE NO. IN. MM 12u h h, v.s S�( 6 0.132 3.36 O Q 8 10.094 2.38 t y L 10 0.079 2.00 $ 12 0.066 1.68 0 (jW 0.047 1.19 D 36 1 25 0.033 0.84 ' �� O TO 2p30' 0.023 0.60 q (Jr 40 0.016 0.42wv 50 . 0.0.12 0.30 70 0.008 0.21 100 0.006 0.15 200 10.003 0.08 SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT CAMP DRESSER & McKEII SIEVE ANALYSIS 9 JOB No. DATE y r LOCATION uct�li � �CT' '`; f Z, BY L1 I Grey-Q SAMPLE TYPE INTERVAL U.S.STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 100 70 50 40 30 20 16 1 12 10 8 6 90 7 sr 80 _ _ 1 ��I 1. —��1 — !L h_ i T1 1 i—.r=— —� — 'i,_l_ ----� _1-r_.-I• --'—.— 70 i Lu uj ' —'— — — — w LL ' — —— T — -+_—_ , :. — _I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 J0 — -_ 1 I 1 J 40 1 — — 1 1 I �— — i 1 1 I11 f . 1 U 1 I , T-I, 1 1 ! 1 1 1 ! a I I 1 1 1 1 —I 1 30 1 , 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I it I IC I 1 j I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 11 20 1 I 1 1 1 fill 1 1 1 _ 1 _ 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 t 1 11 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 10 i 1 1 _ 1 _ f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 —-- 1 1 1_ ( 1 fill I i i 1 I I I I I I I I ' 1 i 1 1 _� 1 1 1 I 11 1 1 11 : 1 I ;-1 _ —_ il 1 I 1 I I 1 1 i I I t 1 •�— 11 r' t 1 1 1 . 11 I 1 i —� 1 1 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 I 1 o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 a0 90 100 110 120 130 IN. 0.5• 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 MM SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. SLOT OPENIN RETAIN D COMMENTS SIEVE NO. IN. MM g` 6 0.132 3.36 p O c* ok 8 0.094 2.38 (Iv s `� 10 0.079 2.00 gp z s 12 10.066 1.68 D q S (q Vr 0.047 1.19 t g I IN (Led 0.033 0.84 5 9 203p' 10.023 0.60 oo /QQ 2,0 D &0 40 10.016 0.42 50 0.012 0.30 70 0.008 0.21 100 0.006 0.15 200 0.003 0.08 SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT CAMP DRESSER & McKE SIEVE ANALYSIS -- JOB No. DATE S C' LOCATION �� `�'� bLWl ) Z BY C(l 44-e� SAMPLE TYPE INTERVAL U.S.STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 100 70 50 40 30 20 16 12 10 8 6 -�-- - - -- -- --;--� 90 =�- ul 70 UJ 1-r- 1 • 60 'W -- U - -�-�- -� I T I I � _ . 1 I • 1 1 1 I 1 �...r,-y, 11 -.� M - _- T ��-1 , 1 T Imo- 1 I I I j �� I - i -� CL W 50 C 40 V I1 - '- -�' -' --+- ' 1;) I I I I I 1 -�� I I 1 1 1I 1 I �I 1 _1 - 1 1 ' ' 30 1 1 • 1 1 1 i t 1 1 : 1 . 1 _� • 1 _ 11 1 - 20 7 ! oil 1 1 ' I I 1 I � I I 1 1 T 1 I 1 1 1 1 f I10 I 1 11 I 1 11 I t 1 77 i I I 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 0 I I I • 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90 100 110 120 130 IN. 0.5• 1.0 3.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 61M SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. SLOT OPENIN 11 RETAINED COMME S - SIEVE NO. IN. MM ID 6 ' 6 0.132 3.36 0 8 0.094 2.38 10 0.079 2.00 40 '20 r4 LlZ-2— 16) d 12 0.066 1.68 1 1r V o 0 q5Z ty td 0.047 1.19 g 9 3. t D 8a 1620 0.033 0.84 7b38- 0.023 0.60 (�*D 40 0.016 0.42 50 0.012 0.30 70 0.008 0.21 100 0.006 10.15 200 0.003 10.08 SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT CAMP DRESSER & McKE SIEVE ANALYSIS �LL JOB No. j�B �1��(Z DATE O6- a7' 65s� LOCATION BY _—Rev k SAMPLE TYPE 4-14,Vd / Ac�L INTERVAL U.S.STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 100 70 50 40 30 ro 16 =� 12 10 8 6 90 -- -- -J_ - I •-- I I - 1 1 1 1 1 1 _ I 1 � - - -. - -- � I -I�� _� 1 - T: I1 + 1� - 1 I 80 --1 t• I -•- LU ..l- F 70 TJ_ _ _ __� _ ��_!_ �J-.. �._^-ice I 1 1 1 I �� I i ^ I 1_7- V L 7 W CIT- i 1_7 I-I - - uj - 1 �1�-. r-l., U 30 20 ' ' - 1 ' • ' ' 1 1i1, 1 I 1 � �+� , I .I , I I 1- I 1 1 1 I 1 1 7 _ 1 1 1 1 10 1 - 1 1 _i O -- I I 1 1 1 -1 + 1 i + 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 1 IN. i 1 0.1 5 1.0 3.5 2.0 2.1 5 3.0 MM SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. SLOT OPENIN RETAINED COMMENTS SIEVE NO. IN. MM D 16-0 IG 6 0.132 3.36 a D 8 0.094 2.38 10 0.079 2.00 12 10.066 1.68 1 b 0.047 1.19 '7 (, 26 0.033 0.84 0.023 0.60 2 0-0 LOD 40 0.016 0.42 50 0.012 0.30 70 0.008 0.21 100 0.006 0.15 200 0.003 0.08 SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT CAMP DRESSER & MCKE SIEVE ANALYSIS JOB No. DATE S-OCT-`TS LOCATION _T� �Z BY (` SAMPLE TYPE 1�jZAVai- INTERVAL U.S.STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 1�J 70 5000 30 rzo 16 I!+ 12 10 8 6 I I 1 1 I 1 -7-- --- - -f^-•- t�--�, _ _ 1 I --.a.. ?_--;ice. -;-{ I I- i—----_i-_ _�_ ----- 90 80 _- -+-- - -�;_,- II 1 1 I ; < 70 UJI cc _ I , I I 1 1 I i j I I UJI V _� _ __T __ i _ - I 1 IT 1 I 1 I TI --�•- ____ �.-_-.i-� i . I I �- I w 'I-1_ _- -T- ---- I i i I 1 1 T_ IT i 1 -I 1 1 _ 1 1 I I I I I 11 1 I I 77' - 1 I - - 1 1 I I_-1 �_-_ I 1 -_ •� ' '-- I _ ' _ _- 40 ilk1 I 1 I I I I 30 ' ' - --- - - -- �— - I 1 - I I I I t 20 I T 1 1 1 1 T I I i I sit - ; II 1 I I 1 I _t II 1 I 1 1 I 1 _ 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I - 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i - -7 I I I ! 1 I _- - 0 I I 1 1 1 I 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1`10 120 IV-IN. � a 1 � 1 i 0.5 1.0 9.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 him SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. SLOT OPENIN RETAINED C ENTS ' SIEVE _V NO. IN. MM 13 /� D Iq-a pOK 6 0.132 3.36 10 ID 8 0.094 2.38 12, 10. 0.079 2.00 Z 12 0.066 1.68 L 0.047 1.19 ITO 0.033 0.84 70.023 0.60 Y a tob 40 0.016 0.42 0V 50 0.012 0.30 70 8 0.21 100 0.006 0.15 200 110.003 0.08 SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT CAMP DRESSER & MCKE SIEVE ANALYSIS JOB No. DATE LOCATION BY ! SAMPLE TYPE QA-✓9P(- PA-5-1�- INTERVAL _Craves �a r- U.S.STANDARD SIEVE NUMBERS 100 100 70 50 30 20 16 11 12 10 B 6 '-- _- ' - --ate_ I 1 - -��i...� �_ --7 I-• -��-. 1 1 - -- 90 80 - Z L 77uj 70 cc („1 1 I - --T - - 1 I- - •' I 1 - I ^-� I - 1 I I I _-r.�-- .-•--'..-1 r_ -- . 7, w 1-- -- T 1 - --' - - - _ — — 50 w _ -- — - — ---'=-- -^ 40 U I -30 --_ � ' t1 I , 1 I I I I ! ! 1 I 11 `] i t 1 I I 1 I 1 • ! I 20 Nt 10 /� I 1 1 I I I 41. 1 0 1 I I -f . 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 50 90 100 110 120 IST IN. 0.5 . 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 mm SLOT OPENING AND GRAIN SIZE IN THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH AND MM. U.S. SLOT OPENING RETAINED COMMENTS SIEVE NO. IN. MM 11=X 12.0 96 in, RU.KAi#JQ Ftv%,t -'X-- 6 0.132 3.36 O O t D n, r 8 0.094 2.38 1 $ 4 b� T 10 0.079 2.00 a o2 0.6 12 0.066 1.s6 L014 $y 11,,6 3 jq je 0.047 1.19 L5y -1 1.3 b 26 0.033 0.84 Z (p s 1$ 0.023 0.60 40 0.016 0.42 2-00 ?-oa IOD 50 10.012 0.30 - --- 70 10.008 0.21 100 0.006 0.15 200 0.003 0.08 SIEVE ANALYSIS PLOT CAMP DRESSER & McKE �M` ,x. r� Y. �TW SLY 24Y1 All -it!at i.' 16 r4 C1 J� x APPENDIX C GEOPHYSICAL LOGS, CALIPER LOGS, FLOWMETER LOGS X r J{k F ,+ �`7�+i�az^��;*�•� i�*-{��Y F+�lt=� �� Si°hY'psy9�'J S` APPENDIX D WATER QUALITY DATA 4 Station Name: WELLDEV State Well No.: Station Type: SAMPLE STATION Well Owner: Sample Station Name: WELLDEV Well Name: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Sample Group ID: 95012829 Lab Sample No.: OCWD9522936 Sample ID: 95020512 Laboratory: OCWD Semple Date/Time: 09/23/1995 15:25:00 Receive Date/Time: 09/25/1995 09:25:00 End Sample Date/Time: Sample Received By: Li Sample Depth (Ft): - Analysis Requested: CONJUSE Sample Matrix: WATER No. of Bottles: 3 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. Field Preserved: Y Sampled By: JOHN HOLMES Field Cooled: Y Monitoring Program: Well Construction Sampling Comments: JIB-12/1 ZONE 1(682'-7021) Parameter Analysis Dates Result Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 2510E 09/28/1995 360 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 09/28/1995 226 mg/L 1 mg/L pH pH 4500H+B 09/23/1995 8.2 UNITS Na Sodium A200.7 10/04/1995 43.6 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium A200.7 10/04/1995 2.0 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium A200.7 10/04/1995 1.8 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium A200.7 10/04/1995 27.9 mg/L .1 mg/L Fe Iron A200.7 10/04/1995 230 ug/L 1 ug/L Mn Manganese A200.7 10/04/1995 23 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK. Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/02/1995 128 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/02/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/02/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/02/1995 128 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness (as CaCO3) A200.7 10/04/1995 76.9 mg/L 1 mg/L Cl Chloride A300.0 09/26/1995 10.9 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen A300.0 09/26/1995 <0.4 mg/L .4 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen A300.0 09/26/1995 c0.10 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus A300.0 09/26/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate A300.0 09/26/1995 31.4 mg/L .5 ma/L S2 Sulfide 4500S2-D 09/26/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon A415.11, 09/27/1995 0.22 mg/L .01 mg/L (Unfiltered) TRCOLR True Color (filtered) 2120E 09/26/1995 <3 UNITS 3 UNITS Approved: Y OCWD WRMS RPTH 1951 12/04/1995 13:49:32 Page#: 1 Data Access: INTERNAL Station Name: WELLDEV State Well No.: Station Type: SAMPLE STATION Well Owner: Sample Station Name: WELLDEV Well Name: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Sample Group ID: 95012828 Lab Sample No.: OCWD9522937 Sample ID: 95020876 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Date/Time: 09/24/1995 10:45:00 Receive Date/Time: 09/25/1995 09:25:00 End Sample Date/Time: Sample Received By: Li Sample Depth (Ft) : Analysis Requested: CONJUSE Sample Matrix: WATER No. of Bottles: 4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. Field Preserved: Y Sampled By: TED JOHNSON Field Cooled: Y Monitoring Program: Well Construction Sampling Comments: HB-12/1 ZONE 2 (530'-5501) Parameter Analysis Dates Result Detect Limits Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 2510B 09/28/1995 354 ___ um/cm 1._-______ _.--------- _---_ _um/cm_______-_ TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 09/28/1995 184 mg/L 1 mg/L pH pH 450014+B 09/24/1995 8.1 UNITS Na Sodium A200.7 10/04/1995 47.2 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium A200.7 10/04/1995 2.4 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium A200.7 10/04/1995 2.5 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium A200.7 10/04/1995 27.4 mg/L .1 mg/L Fe Iron A200.7 10/04/1995 390 ug/L 1 ug/L Mn Manganese A200.7 10/04/1995 14 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/02/1995 123 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/02/1995 cl.0 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/02/1995 cl.0 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/02/1995 123 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness (as CaCO3) A200.7 10/04/1995 78.7 mg/L 1 mg/L C1 Chloride A300.0 09/26/1995 14.5 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen A300.0 09/26/1995 <0.4 mg/L .4 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen A300.0 09/26/1995 <0.10 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus A300.0 09/26/1995 c0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate A300.0 09/26/1995 32.1 mg/L .5 mg/L S2 Sulfide 4500S2-D 09/26/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon A415.11, 09/27/1995 0.26 mg/L .01 mg/L (Unfiltered) ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150B 09/27/1995 0.0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150B 09/27/1995 1.0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number (Median) 2150E 09/27/1995 0.0 TON TRCOLR True Color (filtered) 2120E 09/26/199S <3 UNITS 3 UNITS Approved: Y OCWD WRMS RPT# 1951 12/04/1995 13:48:58 Page#: 1 Data Access: INTERNAL Station Name: WELLDEV State Well No.: Station Type: SAMPLE STATION Well Owner: Sample Station Name: WELLDEV Well Name: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Sample Group ID: 95013567 Lab Sample No.: OCWD9523113 Sample ID: 95020879 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Date/Time: 09/26/1995 23:00:00 Receive Date/Time: 09/27/1995 08:50:00 End Sample Date/Time: Sample Received By: LJ Sample Depth (Ft): - Analysis Requested: CONJUSE Sample Matrix: WATER No. of Bottles: 3 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. Field Preserved: N Sampled By: WILL GROVE Field Cooled: Y Monitoring Program: Well Construction Sampling Comments: HB-12/1 ZONE 3 (365'-3851) Parameter Analysis Dates Result Detect Limits Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 2510E 10/02/1995 406 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 09/28/1995 224 mg/L 1 mg/L pH pH 4500H+B 09/26/1995 8.2 UNITS Na Sodium A200.7 10/04/1995 40.4 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium A200.7 10/04/1995 2.3 mg/L 1 mg/L Mg Magnesium A200.7 10/04/1995 7.0 mg/L 1 mg/L Ca Calcium A200.7 10/04/1995 37.7 mg/L .1 mg/L Fe Iron A200.7 10/04/1996 310 ug/L 1 ug/L 'MA Manganese A200.7 10/04/1995 5 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/05/1995 162 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/05/1995 cl.0 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/05/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/05/1995 162 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness (as CaCO3) A200.7 10/04/1995 123 mg/L 1 mg/L C1 Chloride A300.0 09/28/1995 10.6 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen A300.0 09/28/1995 <0.4 mg/L .4 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen A300.0 09/28/1995 c0.10 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus A300.0 09/28/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L •(orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate A300.0 09/28/1995 32.3 mg/L .5 mg/L S2 Sulfide 4500S2-D 09/27/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon A415.11, 09/27/1995 1.00 mg/L .01 mg/L (Unfiltered) ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150E 09/27/1995 0.0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 21508 09/27/1995 1.0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number (Median) 2150E 09/27/1995 0.0 TON TRCOLR True Color (filtered) 2120E 09/28/1995 c3 UNITS 3 UNITS Approved: Y OCWD WRMS RPT# 1951 12/04/1995 13:51:52 Page#: 1 Data Access: INTERNAL Station Name: WELLDEV State Well No.: Station Type: SAMPLE STATION Well Owner: Sample Station Name: WELLDEV Well Name: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Sample Group ID: 95014069 Lab Sample No.: OCWD9524818 Sample ID: 95021717 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Date/Time: 10/26/1995 10:10:00 Receive Date/Time: 10/27/1995 10:50:00 End Sample Date/Time: Sample Received By: W " Sample Depth (Ft) : Analysis Requested: CONJUSE Sample Matrix: WATER No. of Bottles: 3 Sampling Method: SUBMERSIBLE PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. Field Preserved: Y Sampled By: WILLIAM F. GROVE Field Cooled: Y Monitoring Program: Well Construction Sampling Comments: PUMPING RATE: 1500 GPM.; HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL 12 SAMPLE TAKEN USING A TEMP. PUMP. Parameter Analysis Dates Result Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 2510E 11/01/1995 511 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 10/27/1995 270 mg/L 1 mg/L !PH pH 4500H+B 10/26/1995 8.0 UNITS Na Sodium A200.7 11/01/1995 35.7 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium A200.7 11/01/1995 2.8 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium A200.7 11/01/1995 9.7 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium A200.7 11/01/1995 58.5 mg/L .1 mg/L Fe Iron A200.7 11/01/1995 59 ug/L 1 ug/L Mn Manganese A200.7 11/01/1995 12 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/31/1995 166 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/31/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/31/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/31/1995 166 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness (as CaCO3) A200.7 11/01/1995 286 mg/L 1 mg/L C1 Chloride A300.0 10/27/1995 29.9 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen A300.0 10/27/1995 <0.4 mg/L .4 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen A300.0 10/27/1995 0.14 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus A300.0 10/27/2995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate A300.0 10/27/1995 42.9 mg/L .5 mg/L S2 Sulfide 4500S2-D 10/31/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon A415.11, 10/27/1995 0.35 mg/L .01 mg/L (Unfiltered) ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150E 10/27/1995 0.0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150E 10/27/1995 0.0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number (Median) 2150B 10/27/1995 0.0 TON TRCOLR True Color (filtered) 2120E 10/27/1995 <3 UNITS 3 U14ITS Approved: Y OCWD WRMS RPT# 1951 12/04/1995 14:16:57 Page#: 1 Data Access: INTERNP.T. Station Name: WELLDEV State Well No. : Station Type: SAMPLE STATION Well Owner: Sample`Station Name: WELLDEV Well Name: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS .Sample Group ID: 95014068 Lab Sample No.: OCWD9524817 Sample ID: 95022716 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Date/Time: 10/26/1995 12:10:00 Receive Date/Time: 10/27/1995 10:50:00 End Sample Date/Time: Sample Received By: LJ Sample Depth (Ft): Analysis Requested: CONJUSE Sample Matrix: WATER No. of Bottles: 3 Sampling Method: SUBMERSIBLE PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. Field Preserved: Y Sampled By: WILLIAM F. GROVE Field Cooled: Y Monitoring Program: Well Construction Sampling Comments: PUMPING RATE: 2250 GPM.; HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL 12 SAMPLED USING A TEMP. PUMP. Parameter Analysis Dates Result Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 2510E 11/01/1995 512 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 10/27/1995 288 mg/L 1 mg/L PH pH 4500H+B 10/26/1995 8.1 UNITS Na Sodium A200.7 11/01/199S 34.7 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium A200.7 11/01/1995 2.7 mg/L 1 mg/L Mg Magnesium A200.7 11/01/1995 9.2 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium A200.7 11/01/1995 55.6 mg/L .1 mg/L Fe Iron A200.7 11/01/199S 41 ug/L 1 ug/L Mn Manganese A200.7 11/01/1995 12 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/31/1995 162 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/31/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/31/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/31/1995 162 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness (as CaCO3) A200.7 11/01/1995 177 mg/L 1 mg/L Cl Chloride A300.0 10/27/1995 30.3 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen A300.0 10/27/1995 <0.4 mg/L .4 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen A300.0 10/27/1995 0.11 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus A300.0 10/27/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate A300.0 10/27/1995 43.6 mg/L .5 mg/L S2 Sulfide 4500S2-D 10/31/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon A415.11, 10/27/1995 0.29 mg/L .01 mg/L (Unfiltered) ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150B 10/27/1995 0.0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150E 10/27/1995 0.0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number (Median) 2150E 10/27/1995 0.0 TON TRCOLR True Color (filtered) 2120E 10/27/1995 <3 UNITS 3 UNITS Approved: Y OCWD WRMS RPT# 1951 12/04/1995 14:19:02 Page#: 1 Data Access: INTERNAL Station Name: WELLDEV State Well No.: Station Type: SAMPLE STATION Well Owner: Sample Station Name: WELLDEV Well Name: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Sample Group ID: 95014067 Lab Sample No.: OCWD9524816 Sample ID: 95021715 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Date/Time: 10/26/1995 14:10:00 Receive Date/Time: 10/27/1995 10:50:00 End Sample Date/Time: Sample Received By: Li Sample Depth (Ft): Analysis Requested: CONJUSE Sample Matrix: WATER No. of Bottles: 3 Sampling Method: SUBMERSIBLE PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: CAMP DRESSER 6 MCKEE, INC. Field Preserved: Y Sampled By: WILLIAM F. GROVE Field Cooled: Y Monitoring Program: Well Construction Sampling Comments: PUMPING RATE: 3000 GPM.; HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL 12 SAMPLED USING A TEMP. PUMP. Parameter Analysis Dates Result Detect Limits Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 25108 11/01/1995 510 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 254'OC 10/27/1995 280 mg/L 1 mg/L PH pH 4500H+B 10/26/1995 7.9 UNITS Na Sodium A200.7 11/01/1995 35.2 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium A200.7 11/01/1995 2.8 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium A200.7 11/01/1995 9.5 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium A200.7 11/01/1995 55.6 mg/L .1 mg/L Fe Iron A200.7 11/01/1995 52 ug/L 1 ug/L Mn Manganese A200.7 11/01/1995 12 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/31/1995 164 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/31/1995 e1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/31/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) 2320E 10/31/1995 164 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness (as CaCO3) A200.7 11/01/1995 178 mo/L 1 mg/L C1 Chloride A300.0 10/27/1995 30.6 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen A300.0 10/27/1995 <0.4 mg/L .4 rig/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen A300.0 10/27/1995 0.14 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus A300.0 10/27/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate A300.0 1O/27/1995 43.8 mg/L .5 mg/L S2 Sulfide 4500S2-D 10/31/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon A415.11, 10/27/1995 0.29 mg/L .01 mg/L (Unfiltered) ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150E 10/27/1995 0.0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150B 10/27/1995 0.0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number (Median) 2150B 10/27/1995 0.0 TON TRCOLR True Color (filtered) 2120B 10/27/1995 <3 UNITS 3 UNITS Approved: Y OCWD WRMS RPT# 1951 12/04/1995 14:20:54 Page#: 1 Data Access: INTERNAL Station Name: WELLDEV State Well No.: Station Type: SAMPLE STATION Well Owner: Sample Station Name: WELLDEV Well Name: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Sample Group ID: 95014066 Lab Sample No.: OCWD9524815 Sample ID: 95021714 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Date/Time: 10/26/1995 16:10:00 Receive Date/Time: 10/27/1995 10:50:00 End Sample Date/Time: Sample Received By: LJ Sample Depth (Ft) : Analysis Requested: CONJUSE Sample Matrix: WATER No. of Bottles: 3 Sampling Method: SUBMERSIBLE PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. Field Preserved: Y Sampled By: WILLIAM F. GROVE Field Cooled: Y Monitoring Program: Well Construction Sampling Comments: PUMPING RATE: 4500 GPM.; HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL 12 SAMPLED USING A TEMP. PUMP. Parameter Analysis Dates Result Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 2510B 11/01/1995 507 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 10/27/1995 276 mg/L 1 mg/L PH pH 4500H+B 10/26/1995 7.9 UNITS 'Na Sodium A200.7 11/01/1995 35.5 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium A200.7 11/01/1995 2.8 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium A200.7 11/01/1995 9.5 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium A200.7 11/01/1995 55.6 mg/L .1 mg/L Fe Iron A200.7 11/01/1995 130 ug/L 1 ug/L Mn Manganese A200.7 11/01/1995 17 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/31/1995 161 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/31/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/31/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) 2320B 10/31/1995 161 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness (as CaCO3) A200.7 11/01/1995 178 mg/L 1 mg/L C1 Chloride A300.0 10/27/1995 29.8 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen A300.0 10/27/1995 <0.4 mg/L .4 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen A300.0 10/27/1995 0.16 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus A300.0 10/27/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate A300.0 10/27/1995 43.8 mg/L .5 mg/L S2 Sulfide 4500S2-D 10/31/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon A415.11, 10/27/1995 0.30 mg/L .01 mg/L (Unfiltered) ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150E 10/27/1995 0.0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150E 10/27/1995 0.0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number (Median) 2150B 10/27/1995 0.0 TON TRCOLR True Color (filtered) 2120B 10/27/1995 <3 UNITS 3 UNITS Approved: Y OCWD WRMS RPTN 1951 12/04/1995 14:19:47 PageN: 1 Data Access: INTERNAL .Station Name: HB-12/1 State Well No.: OSS/11W-09F00 :Station -Type: WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Station Name: Well Name: HB-12 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS SampletGroup ID: 95014078 Lab Sample No.: OCWD9524966 Sample ID: 95021726 Laboratory: OCWD Sample.Date/Time: 11/01/1995 08:18:00 Receive Date/Time: 11/01/1995 11:45:00 End Sample:Date/Time: Sample Received By: VV Sample Depth (Ft): Analysis Requested: CONJUSE Sample Matrix: WATER No. of Bottles: 2 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. Field Preserved: N Sampled By: BRIAN KELLY Field Cooled: Y Monitoring Program: Conjunctive Use Comments: RUSH SAMPLE; DUE MONDAY 11-6-95. SAMPLE TAKEN WITH DEDICATED PUMP INSTALLED. Parameter Analysis Dates Result Detect Limits Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 2510E 11/03/1995 494 ----- um/cm------ ---- TES 'Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 11/01/1995 306 mg/L 1 mg/L 'PH pH 4500H+B 11/01/1995 8.0 UNITS Na Sodium A200.7 11/01/1995 34.0 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium A200.7 11/01/1995 2.7 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium A200.7 21/01/2995 9.1 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium A200.7 11/01/1995 54.5 mg/L .1 mg/L Fe Iron A200.7 11/01/1995 40 ug/L 1 ug/L Mn Manganese A200.7 11/01/1995 12 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) 2320B 11/03/1995 163 mg/L 1. mg/L OHCa Hydroxide (as CaCO3) 2320E 11/03/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate (as CaCO3) 2320B 11/03/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) 2320B 11/03/1995 163 mg/L 1 mg/L T07MM Total Hardness (as CaCO3) A200.7 11/01/1995 173 mg/L 1 mg/L C1 Chloride A300.0 11/03/1995 33.6 mg/L 5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen A300.0 11/03/1995 <0.4 mg/L .4 ma/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen A300.0 11/03/1995 <0.10 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus A300.0 11/03/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate A300.0 11/03/1995 41.9 mg/L .5 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon A415.11, 11/01/1995 0.42 mg/L .01 mg/L (Unfiltered) ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150E 11/01/1995 0.0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150E 11/01/1995 0.0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number (Median) 2150B 11/01/199S 0.0 TON Approved: Y OCWD WRMS RPT# 1951 12/04/1995 13:56:01 Page#: 1 Data Access: INTERNAL Station Name: NPDES State Well No.: Station Type: SAMPLE STATION Well Owner: Sample Station Name: NPDES Well Name: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Sample Group ID: 95013989 Lab Sample No.: OCWD9524967 Sample ID: 95021586 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Date/Time: 11/01/1995 08:11:00 Receive Date/Time: 11/01/1995 11:45:00 End Sample Date/Time: Sample Received By: VV Sample Depth (Ft): Analysis Requested: SUSSOL Sample Matrix: WATER No. of Bottles: 2 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: CAMP DRESSER 6 MCKEE, INC. Field Preserved: N Sampled By: BRIAN KELLY Field Cooled: Y Monitoring Program: Conjunctive Use Comments: HB-12/1. SAMPLE TAKEN USING A TEMP. PUMP. Parameter Analysis Dates Result Detect Limits Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units S2 Sulfide 4500S2-D 11/01/1995 <0.1 mg/L .1 mg/L SUSSOL Suspended Solids 2540D 11/01/1995 <1.0 mg/L 1 mg/L l Approved: Y OCWD WRMS RPT# 1951 12/04/1995 13:53:55 Page#: 1 Data Access: INTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION/CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM Sample Group Number: p 2 Station Name: �/�(, /,' ��/ — Sampling COMP GRAB WBTOOL Laboratory Name: OCWD Sampled By: �4�g Method: OEDPUMP UBPUMP AIRLIFT '- -- _-- Begin Sample Date/Time: aq 1,525 (circle ono) Other: Send Results To. WQ WF21 tA6 RESEARCH End Sample DateMme: `� , /ls"J - � (circle one) Other: . ` . Sample Deplh (feel): 6 a,:�. - }L->L Mat(k,W- ER OIL Other: Comments: AW ��Z �j . ��'f s S o Co.��[J•�tTi.i'L .. tJS Sampling Agency Abbr: Monitoring Program Abbr: (use rpproprlele codes) Sample Handling Turnaround Anal ses Requested Q as � '" s rti ev wF i �S' .S' ' W s . a .o ooa hh 4 a Laboratory # of �' o a " '� h "' F z b p in p N n h N h n N rrt a m Sample Number Bottles a IL ro F Q0 m Comments CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD FIELD PARAMETERS f1EIj0UISiiEDBY: slgneluro) RECEIVED lure DATE/LIME Lab Sample Number: ( U,ti'I! I' — nU. I I INOUISI j D : (signolure) RECEIVED FOR I AD BY Islgnelure) D E/TIME EC: .3�� 1lnlilo/Cm _ pH: 1 LOGGED IN BY: (sigrrnture) DAl E11IME I emperature: LD T,--f C Dissolved Oxygen: rng/L Diss. Oxygen Temp: C ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION/CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM sample GroupNumber: 95007252 Station Name: (�/�4& Sampling COMP GRAB WBTOOL Laboratory Name: OCWD Sampled By: n Izy� s --Method: Q gSMV SUBPUMP AIRLIFT Begin Sample Date/Time: _ c; ys (circle ono) Oilier: Send Results To:CVRIWF21 LAB RESEARCH E►Id Sample DateMme: 9 .2 y 91fi le: yS-- (circle one) Other: Sample Depth (feet): ?p Se Matrix: ATE SOIL Other: Comments: �d : �� , T�i,•S .r 5 Q CorfJ'vJrGT.�YC -LJfE Q/zc�GG. Sampling Agency Abbr: C Monitoring Program Abbr: 6645", l�oyL, (use appropriate codes) Sample Handling Turnaround Anal ses Requested s C14 co i �C S o c o eY'v e s 0 Laboratory ; # of p h p N N h rn h rn a a a a m Sample Number; Bottles M a = m 0p m n Comments /2 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD FIELD PARAMETERS 11E�IJyAF?tS O : ( lgneturo) RECEIVE D DATE/TIME Lab Sample Number: WtI I 7-- �7A e, 2— HELINQUISHE BY: (slgnoturel rGtZs RECEIVT- ture) D IEITIME EC: 3 r ttnrl�o/cm pH: LOGGED IN BY: (signature) DAIEITIME Temperature: 2 2-- , Sf' C Dissolved Oxygen: mg/L Diss. Oxygen Temp: �/ C u § A,e: F. A ALM, ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATIONICHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM Sample Group Number: 95007331 Station Name' w 5V Sampling P GRAB WBTOOL Laboratory Name: OCWD Sampled By- Method! DEDPUMP 4�UBPUM AIRLIFT -Begfi.Sainple Bale T+,m- (circle one) Other. Send Results To:<0 WF21 GEOLOGY End Sample DateMme: 231LOC> (circle one) LAB RESEARCH Sample Depth(feet): 365— 385 Matrix. WATE SOIL Other: Other: Comments: *f3-- 12 iS ISO,- ec (U(,"Cg^ t tssWeA Sampling Agency Abbr: 2ar-q. Mr-st - 3(2 5 f :J32 'J3 SS Monitoring Program Abbr. uld��-Y—\ (use appropriate codes) Sample Handling Turnaround Analyses Requested IK w ul In -j ED id F- » 111 0 of tn -i -j 0 0 0 qr CD f- torn I,- CO 0) C) N 8 0 0 C3 C) 0 C) — "1 to M F C-) Z Z Laboratory #of iz a. 0 Z to w to tn In M M in to U1 V) w to w C-) Sample Number Bottles Comments T.;�—I Qolof, Act- Ej CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD FIELD PARAMETERS R 7EL 1 1011311�SE Y i u e) RECEIVED BY:(signature) DATErtME Lob Sample Number: NOV H . 9Y fiLmulure) TErrMC RELI Is ED1 :(signalusel RECEIVED FOR LAB BY: E EH: umho/cm p : LOGGED IN BY:(signature) DATEITPAE Temperature: C Dissolved Oxygen: mg/L rl,*— rlvvR-n Tamn- r OR. ..-3E C _ _VTY . .. .TEF. _..1TR. SAMPLE INFORMATION/CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM Sample Group Number: I 9$008300 I Station Name: () L (_ � Sampling COMP GRAB WBTOOL Laboratory Name: OCWD Sampled By: (,C1 /J/a.;•t )=. Ca r-o•' Method: DEDPUMP-t�_ -AIRLIFT Begin Sample Daterrime: /c(sl t O- I o (chcla one) Other: _ Send Results;To:C WF21 GEOLOGY End Sample Date/Time: I S'� p j,�ly( (chore one) LAB RESEARCH Sample Depth(feet): I Ma ATE SOIL Other. Other. Comments: `�uw�n ;�n c,,. '• j OG �;� Sampling Agency Abbr. C Q M Monitoring Program Abbr. U LL C ,,Aj (use apptoprtale codes) Sample Handling Tumaround Analyses Rec uested o m ui 2 } F � O O O oocStnF ei � oDvv�irNi �\ QZZ Laboratory 0of rLaL) z wtDmmmmviNin � � NNcD m (7t7 Sample Number Bottles Comments CHAIN OF CUS ODY RECORD FIELD PARAMETERS RELIIJ".1 s ature)�� 7,��t`/� RECEIVED BY:(sta,alwa) VATUME Lab Sample Number. [— r RELINOUISHED' Y:(signature) RECEIVED FOR LAB B • not ) A�i E/TME EC: umho/cm Q pH: LOGGED IN BY:(signature) DATEMW Temperature: C Dissolved Oxygen: mglL 061271199E Dlss.Oxygen Temp: C ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 95008L99 SAMPLE INFORMATIONICHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM Sample Group Number: Station Name: w�� 1 ti� U Sampling COMP GRAB WBTOOL I Laboratory Name: OCWD _ Sampled By. (�� /f IA,r► f=- . Method: DEDPLIMP Begin Sample Datefflme: I U./Z6I 9'5l 1? ' r o (elrcleone) Other: ��5 Send Results Tw(W9i WF211 GEOLOGY End Sample Dale/Time: / 5 li t�<i«t P (ctrcte one) LAB RESEARCH Sample Depth(feet): Ma AT SOIL Other. Other. Comments: �,v��'' FI•uHfi�a f a.� ��zc�can (.c �IC 12_ Sampling Agency Abbr: MonRoring Program Abbr. L C LL L t/�►i (use approprtare codes) Sample HanCo Tumaround Anelyses Re uested C) it A l Q 5 wo as crT- I ntosccin r- 000 �' �Q Laboratory ool EaU Z � 90C 00mMnI X V oni14 .1 adZUr z ' Sample Number Bottles Comments a- LLH CHAIN OF ¢USTODY RECORD FIELD PARAMETERS R�LRJ!I; D (s nature) g 7eC �c5 RECEIVED BY:(.Ignatan) DATEITNE Lob Sample Number: RELIN BY:islpnalure) RECEIVED FOR LAB BY:(. afore) A D TEfTME EC:__——umho/cm z7rf; roSG pH: LOGGED IN BY:(signature) DATElTME Temperature: C Dissolved Oxygen: mg/L nice 0ywen Temn• C ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION/CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM Sample GroupNumber: g5��8ti98 Station Name: �/l?�'�_� P �` Sampling COMP GRAB WBTOOL Laboratory Name: OCWD _ Sampled By: flick-I.,k . !=, G -C, Method: DEDPUMP"I IRUFT Begin Sample DatelTlme: 1 p1-26/ y- 1 G (drcle am) Other. Send Results To:(WCI; WF21 GEOLOGY End Sample Date/Time: (aaeone) LAB RESEARCH Sample Depth(feet):_ Ma ATE SOIL Other. Other. Comments: Ag c,,e-'�% �' �:� �+�t.� I♦uHfir`a t3Z' ct cl.� Gc .�E I 'Z Sampling Agency Abbr. �b �� Monftorfng Program Abbr: l�� LL L cNr (use appropriate codes) Sample Handtln Tumaround alyses Rec uested wo 0 -j 0 to colorr.- eococ zz Laboratory #of I-io- t) z � gttoowwwwwo nGlu� t,,nr � N0 � c7 (9 Sample Number Bottles Comments CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD FIELD PARAMETERS RELMOUISHED Y:(. .lur.) -�(►t t_�`� RECEIVED air:(.Ignalute) DATEMM Lab Sample Number: i R LMOUIS ED BY:(slgnalure) RECEIVED FOR LAB BY:(s elu n TEJTME EC: _—^umho/cm a -6 pH: LOWED IN BY:(signahae) DIITUME Temperature: C Dissolved Oxygen: mg& nkQ r)yvnpn Tpmn• C, ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATIONICHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM Sample Group Number: 95008".99 Station Name: ()j CLLDEV Sampling COMP GRAB WBTOOL Laboratory Name: OCWD _ Sampled By (0)t//io,•vp k . )= . G cc Method: DEDPUMP• IRLIFT Begin Sample DaterTime: (()/z(,/cf51 I) I U (cwcte one) Other: Send Results To:(Wgi WF21 GEOLOGY End Sample DaterTlme: (clrcleone) LAB RESEARCH Sample Depth(feel): Ma ATE SOIL Other. Other. Comments: � 1J0-A,---.,'' { p rr,\ --- - jlk%j> Sampling Agency Abbr. C b I�� Monhtodng Program Abbr: LL L oNr (use appoprlale codes) Sample Handling Tumaround alyses Rec nested tu w r S > > Laborato #of N - atnm � aotnv- ~ c0000 QQJJ rY � aU 2 � Lntoininininugiv� ! uullu� 11% umiro (� ad (99Z Sample Number Bottles Comments CHAIN OF FUSTODY RECORD FIELD PARAMETERS RELNCRA BY(a It re) RECEIVED BY:(signafun) DATEMM Lab Semple Number. F— _ -� - 7 75 RELINOWSH D BY:(slgnalae) RECENED FOR LAB a (signalise 'Eimw EC: umho/cm LOGGED N BY:(signalure) DATErME Temperature: C Dissolved Oxygen: mg/L niSa Oxvoen Temn: C ORANGE CONTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION/CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM Sample Group Number: L95008424 Station Name: NPDES Sampling COMP GRAB WBTOOL Laboratory Name: OCWD Sampled By. ;,t k r? KZU tj C t4 Method: g5jQ AP SUBPUMP AIRLIFT Begin Sample Date/Time: 111,195' /Ow (circle one) Other. Send Results To: WF21 GEOLOG End Sample Date/Time: It /I�qs" I o*13 (eir¢b one) LAB RESEARCH Sample Depth(feet): Matrix WATE SOIL Other. Other. :omments: HB-1211 Discharge Sampling Agency Abbr. CDM Monitoring Program Abbr. CJUSE (use appropriate codes) Sample Handling Turnaround . Analyses Requested s� v 0 E 0 U 0 Z Laboratory #of Sample Number Bottles Comments NeD6 fig•iz , 2 X X X k CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD FIELD PARAMETERS RE UI �'(signature) RECEIVED BY:(signature) DATEMW Lab Sample Number. R NOUISHED 6 .(signature) RECENE R Y:(s' ature) %�VTEnW EC: umholcm ` /!' pH: LOGGED IN BY:(signature) DATEMAE Temperature: C 10J06J1"3 Dissolved Oxygen: mg/L Diss.Oxygen Temp: C RANGE COLVtY WATER DISTRICT '' 95008425 .. AMPLE INFORMATION/CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM Sam le Grou Number: Station Name: HB-12/1 Sampling COMP GRAB WBTOOL Laboratory Name: OCWD Sampled By �J K •{ CDM Method: DPUMI' SUBPUMP AIRLIFT Begin Sample DateTme: lI i/y /OW f, (circle one) Other. Send Results To: WF21 GEOLOG End Sample Daten-ime: /i///if 10kLI (ciroleone) LAB RESEARCH Sample Depth(feet): Matrix: WATE SOIL Other. Other. 3mments: Sampring Agency Abbr. CDM Monitoring Program Abbr. CJUSE (use approprkde codes) Sample Handling Turnaround Analyses Requested w rn v D d —, c) h, O aL Laboratory #of Sample Number Bottles Comments $-I r-- 2 X X X1 I I I I I I I I IR!1_fff � -s �tC .`t'uvof L Htm ::HAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD FIELD PARAMETERS M7E !"s HED ignature) RECEIVED BY:(signature) DATEMAE Lab Sample Number. LINQUISHED Bvt , nature) RECE J,DR LAB BY� ill-¢AT� � pH: umho/cm LOGGED IN BY:(signature) //DATEMME Temperature: C Io/M1993 Dissolved Oxygen: mg/L Diss.Oxygen Temp: C X a rl s ui 70 Ey 'gq ..................... -mm� A.M� A� mm!!� om!mwm NONNI" ' r� � Y '`� a �.�fr rf u�•'�X+t t�t�'. 4 ��y, �'J�7�!.i {•t� •.c� I:�'�1" N ��} mot••�:Y:, w•,s.♦ .0 Y. r r,1. APPENDIX E TEST PUMPING DATA HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL NO.12 STEP TEST OCTOBER 26,1995 Static W.L a 54.3 Total Step Water Time Time(min) Thne(min) Level Drawdown Comments 10/26/95 8:30 0 0 54.30 0.00 Begin Step I @ 8:30 10/26/95 8:30 0.5 0.5 67.20 12.90 Rate-1500 gpm 10/26/95 8:31 1 1 66.45 12.15 10/26/95 8:32 2 2 66.70 12:40 10/26/95 8:33 3 3 67.50 13.20 10/26/95 8:34 4 4 67.58 13.28 10/26/95 8:35 5 5 67.71 13.41 10/26/95 8:36 6 6 67.79 13.49 10/26/95 8:37 7 7 67.91 13.61 10/26/95 8:38 8 8 67.98 13.68 10/26/95 8:39 9 9 68.02 13.72 10/26/95 8:40 10 10 68.16 13.86 10/26/95 8:42 12 12 68.28 13.98 10/26/95 8:44 14 14 68.37 14.07 10/26/95 8:46 16 16 68.47 14.17 10/26/95 8:48 18 18 68.53 14.23 10/26/95 8:50 20 20 68.56 14.26 10/26/95 8:55 25 25 68.71 14.41 10/26/95 9:00 30 30 68.82 14.52 10/26/95 9:10 40 40 69.03 14.73 10/26/95 9:20 50 50 69.17 14.87 10/26/95 9:30 60 60 69.24 14.94 10/26/95 9:40 70 70 69.34 15.04 10/26/95 9:50 80 80 69.42 15.12 10/26/9510:00 90 90 69.50 15.20 10/26/95 10:10 100 100 69.57 15.27 :0/26/95 10:201 110 110 69.58 15.28 10/26/95 10:30 120 120 69.58 15.28 Begin Step 2 @ 10:31 10/26/95 10:31 121 1 75.80 21.50 Rate-2250 gpm I Ot26(95 10:32 122 2 76.33 22.03 10/26/9510:33 123 3 76.47 22.17 10/26/95 10:34 124 4 76.53 22.23 10/26/9510:35 125 5 76.65 22.35 30126/9510:36 126 6 76.71 22.41 10/2619510:37 127 7 76.77 22.47 10/26/9510:38 128 8 76.82 22.52 10/26/95 10:39 129 9 76.87 22.57 I Qt26/95 10:40 130 10 76.90 22.60 10126/9510:42 132 12 76.97 22.67 10126/9510:44 134 14 77.06 22.76 10/26/9510:46 136 16 77.11 22.81 10/26/95 10:48 138 18 77.15 22.85 10/26/9510:50 140 20 77.19 22.89 IGt2619510:55 145 25 77.30 23.00 1012619511:00 150 30 77.36 23.06 10/26/95 11:10 160 40 77.47 23.17 IM6/9511:20 170 50 77.58 23.28 10126/9511:30 180 60 77.66 23.36 10/26/9511:40 190 70 77.75 23.45 1012619511:50 200 80 77.85 23.55 10/26/95 12:00 210 90 77.93 23.63 10/26/95 12:10 220 100 78.01 23.71 10/2619512:20 230 110 1 78.05 23.75 1 of isk projects\9153-128\sprdshts\hbI2stha.xls HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL NO.12 STEP TEST OCTOBER 26,1995 Sudc W.L o 54.3 Total Step Water Time Time(min) Time(min) Level Drawdown Comments 10/26/95 12:30 240 120 78.11 23.81 Begin Step 3 @ 12:31 10/26/95 12:31 241 1 84.10 29.80 Rate-3000 gpm 10/2619512:32 242 2 85.85 31.55 10/26/9512:33 243 3 86.04 31.74 10/26/9512:34 244 4 86.20 31.90 10/26/9512:35 245 5 86.27 31.97 10/26/9512:36 246 6 86.35 32.05 10/26/9512:37 247 7 86.42 32.12 10/26/9512:38 248 8 86.48 32.18 1012619512:39 249 9 86.55 32.25 10/26/95 12:40 250 10 86.60 32.30 Adj.Q up 10126/9512:42 252 12 86.68 32.38 10/2619512:44 254 14 86.75 32.45 10/26/95 12:46 256 16 86.81 32.51 Adj.Q up 10/26(9512:48 258 18 86.87 32.57 10/26/9512:50 260 20 86.93 32.63 10/2619512:55 265 25 87.06 32.76 10/26/95 13:00 270 30 87.13 32.83 10/26/95 13:10 280 40 87.95 33.65 10/2619513:20 290 50 88.10 33.80 10/2619513:30 300 60 88.24 33.94 10/26✓95 13:40 310 70 88.33 34.03 • 10/26/9513:50 320 80 88.42 34.12 10/26t95 14:00 330 90 88.54 34.24 10/26/95 14:10 340 100 88.62 34.:2 10/26r9514:20 350 110 98.68 34.39 10/26/95 14:30 360 120 88.76 34.46 Begin Step 4 @ 14,31 10/26/95 14:31 361 1 103.60 49.30 Rate-4500 gpm 10/2619514:32 362 2 104.20 49.90 1012619514:33 363 3 104.70 50.40 10/26/95 14:34 364 4 104.92 50.62 10/26/95 14:35 365 5 105.14 50.84 10/2619514:36 366 6 105.22 50.92 10/26/95 14:37 367 7 105.33 51.03 10/26/95 14:38 368 8 105.45 51.15 10/26/95 14:39 369 9 105.52 51.22 10/2619514:40 370 10 105.60 51.30 10/26/9514:42 372 12 105.80 51.50 10/26/95 14:44 374 14 105.98 51.68 10/26/95 14:46 376 16 106.10 51.80 " 10/26/9514:48 378 18 106.18 51.88 10/26/9514:50 380 20 106.26 51.96 I Ot26/95 14:55 385 25 106.44 52.14 10/2619515:00 390 30 106.72 52.42 10/26/9515:10 400 40 107.04 52.74 10/26t95 15:20 410 50 167.22 52.92 10/26/95 15:30 420 60 107.53 53.23 10126/9515:40 430 70 107.68 53.38 10/26/9515:50 440 80 107.82 53.52 10126/9516:00 450 90 107.94 53.64 10/26/95 16:10 460 100 108.13 53.83 10/26/9516:20 470 110 108.36 54.06 10/26/9516:30 480 120 108.50 54.20 2 of 2 1:\projects\9153-128\sprdshts\hbI2stho.x1s i HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL NO.12 AQUIFER TEST-CONSTANT DISCHARGE OCTOBER 30-NOVEMBER 1,1995 STATIC W.L.- 52.9 Date/Hour Pumping Time Depth to Drawdown Comments Rate pH Ee Temp Water BMP S (minutes) (feet) (feet) (Rpm) (pmhos) (Deg.C) 10/30/95 9:00 0.0 52.90 0.00 10/30195 9:01 1.0 79.10 26.20 10(30/95 9:02 2.0 79.48 26.58 I IY30195 9:03 3.0 79.60 26.70 10(30195 9:04 4.0 80.01 27.11 10/30/95 9:05 5.0 80.23 27.33 Adj.Q up 2955 10/30/95 9:06 6.0 80.28 27.38 10/30/95 9:07 7.0 81.20 28.30 10/30/95 9:08 8.0 81.45 28.55 10/30/95 9:09 9.0 91.65 28.75 r 10/30/95 9:10 10.0 81.76 28.86 10/30/95 9:12 12.0 81.97 29.07 10/30M 9:14 14.0 82.22 29.32 10/30/95 9:16 16 82.37 29.47 10/30/95 9:18 18 82.60 29.70 2950 10/30/95 9:20 20 82.72 29.82 Adj.Q up 10/30/95 9:25 25 83.60 30.70 10/30/95 9:30 30 83.86 30.96 10/30/95 9:40 40 84.34 31.44 2992 10/30195 9:50 SU 84.68 31.78 10130/9510:00 60 84.95 32.05 1050195 10:10 70 85.15 32.25 2984 10/30/9510:20 80 85.33 32.43 2984 10/30/95 10:30 90 85.37 32.47 Adj.Q up 2972 10/30/95 10:40 100 85.50 32.60 10/30/95 10:50 111) 85.62 32.72 Adj.Q up 2956 I CV30/95 11:00 120 85.94 33.04 10/30/95 11:15 135 86.10 33.20 Adj.Q up 2976 10/30/95 11:30 150 86.60 33.70 3000 1013019512:00 180 86.89 33.99 2998 10/30/9512:30 210 87.12 34.22 3000 10/30/95 13:00 240 87.30 34.40 2997 10/30/95 13:30 270 87.48 34.59 2994 10/30/95 14:00 300 87.69 34.79 2996 IW30/9514:30 330 97.83 34.93 2990 10/30/95 15:00 360 87.94 35.04 2982 1(Y30/9516:00 420 88.13 35.23 2990 IEY30195 17:00 480 88.37 35.47 2991 10/30/95 18:00 540 98.53 35.63 2992 10130/9519:00 600 88.72 35.82 2087 10130/95 20:00 660 88.85 35.95 2986 1(1130/9521:00 720 89.02 36.12 2982 7.70 445 19.7 10/30/95 22:00 780 89.06 36.16 2986 10/30/95 23:00 840 89.20 36.30 2986 7.76 447 19.6 10/31/95 0:00 900 89.29 36.39 2979 IQt3l/951:00 1 960 1 89.35 1 36.45 1 1 2985 x r 1 of 2 1:\projects\9153 128\spreodsheets\HB12HD.REV HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL NO.12 AQUIFER TEST•CONSTANT DISCHARGE OCTOBER 30•NOVEMBER 1,1995 STATIC W.L.= 52.9 Date/Hour Pumping Time Depth to Drawdown Comments Rate pH Ec Temp Water BAIP S (minutes) (feet) (feet) (Rpm) (ymhos) (Deg.Q 1(Y31/95 2:00 1020 89.43 36.53 2981 7.75 448 19.7 ICY31195 3:00 1080 89.54 36.64 2978 I(Y31195 40) 1140 89.53 36.63 Adj.Q up 2981 10/31/95 5:00 1200 89.54 36.64 Adj.Q up 2980 7.76 445 19.6 10/31/95 6:00 1260 89.67 36.77 Adj.Q up 2976 10/31/95 7:00 1320 89.78 36.89 2987 1(4)/95 8:00 1380 89.B5 36.95 Adj.Q up 2979 7.62 450 19.9 10/31/95 9:00 1440 89.95 37.05 2986 10/31/959:50 1490 90.01 37.11 2987 10/31/95 11:00 1560 90.07 37.17 Adj.Q up 2984 7.70 450 20.1 10131/95 12:00 1620 90.15 37.25 Adj.Q up 2984 I(Y31/95 13:00 1680 90.19 37.29 2986 1(1031/95 14:00 1740 90.20 37.30 2988 7.89 450 20.3 10131/9515:00 1800 90.23 37.33 2988 10/31/95 16:00 1860 90.25 37.35 Adj.Q up 2983 I(Y31/9517:00 1920 90.30 37.40 2986 7.52 450 20.0 10/3119518:00 1980 90.34 37.44 1 2988 1013119519:00 2040 90.36 37.46 10/31/95 20:00 2100 90.45 37.55 Adj.Q up 2982 10✓3)/95 21:00 2160 90.47 37.57 3000 7.58 448 20.0 10/31/95 22:00 2220 90.50 37.60 2994 I CV31/95 23:30 2310 90.52 37.62 2993 11/I/95 0:00 2340 90.52 37.62 2996 7.61 446 20.0 I1/l/951:00 2400 90.52 37.62 2985 11/1/95 2:00 2460 90.53 37.63 2990 11/1/95 3:00 2520 90.50 37.60 2990 7.63 441 19.9 11/1195 4:00 2580 90.50 37.60 2988 11/1195 5:00 2640 90.51 37.61 2990 11/1/95 6:00 2700 90.55 37.65 2990 7.58 420 20.3 11/1/95 7:00 2760 90.60 37.70 2991 I I/l/95 8:00 2820 90.62 37.72 2989 11/I/95 8:50 2870 90.66 37.76 2991 2 Of 2 1:\projects\9153-128\spreodsheets\HB12HD.REV T. HUNTINGTON BEACH WELL NO. 12 CONSTANT TEST-RECOVERY Nov.1,1995 STATIC W.L=52.9 Date/llour Pumping Time Depth to Drawdown Water BMP S (minutes) (reef) (feet) I1/I/95 9:00 0.0 90.68 37.78 1111195 9:01 1.0 64.60 11.70 11/1/95 9:02 2.0 63.57 10.67 11/I/95 9:03 3.0 63.05 10.15 1 I/1/95 9:04 4.0 62.65 9.75 1111195 9:05 5.0 62.28 9.38 1111195 9:06 6.0 61.95 9.05 11/l/95 9:07 7.0 61.70 8.80 11/1/95 9:08 8.0 61.56 8.66 11/1/95 9:09 9.0 61.42 8.52 I l/1/95 9:10 10.0 61.26 8.36 1111195 9:12 12.0 61.00 8.10 11/1/95 9:14 14.0 60.77 7.87 11/1/95 S:16 16 60.55 7.65 11/l/95 9:18 18 60.40 7.50 1111195 9:20 20 60.22 7.32 1111195 9:25 25 59.87 6.97 11/l/95 9:30 30 59.59 6.69 11/l/95 9:40 40 59.16 6.26 11/I/95 9:50 50 58.81 5.91 11/1/95 10:00 60 58.55 5.65 11/1/95 10:10 70 58.30 5.40 11/l/95 10:20 80 58.10 5.20 11/1/95 10:30 90 57.96 5.06 11/l/95 10:40 100 57.78 4.88 11/1/95 10:50 110 57.65 4.75 1 i/l/95 11:00 120 57.49 4.59 11/1/95 11:15 135 57.32 4.42 11/1/95 11:30 150 57.19 4.29 11/I/95 12:30 210 56.68 3.78 11/1/95 13:00 240 56.43 3.53 I I/l/95 13:30 270 56.25 3.35 11/l/95 14:00 300 56.08 3.18 11/l/95 14:30 330 55.93 3.03 11/1/95 15:00 360 55.78 2.88 H/1/95 16:00 420 55.55 2.65 1111195 17:00 480 55.34 2.44 11/l/95 18:00 540 55.16 2.26 va Page 1 of 1 i:\projects\9153-128\spreadsheets\HBI2HREC.REV R<. Huntington. Beach # 12 Constant Discharge 404 T = 19 .64 ft2/min 3 I 9 } S' l J ir. 1 1� j u t� j-' ,_I ed t' C..J Y r 6 - a 1� 1 - 1 i 0 .: 100 .. 1000 . 100004 Time ( min) I Huntington Beach # 12 Constant Discharge 100 . T = 19 .64 ft2/rein 10 a 100 . i 1 a � ;. 1 0 0 4 1000 . 100004 i_ CDMCamp Dresser & McKee environmental services offices worldwide �� Attachment D Test Pumping Record Sample Data ' •J d IT AD CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION TO: Debbie De Bow, Civil Engineer Associate FROM: *Ward Johnson, Water Production Supervisor SUBJECT: WELL NO. 12 DISTRIBUTION MAIN LINE DATE: October 20, 1999 This memo is written as documentation of our conversation last Friday surrounding the subject mentioned project. The Water Division staff 's consensus is that the water quality of Well No. 12 is of high quality, and can be introduced into the distribution system without being blended with another source. As such, design of the permanent distribution system should be started as soon as possible. Attached to this cover, you will find the results of our extensive test pumping and the water quality analysis that took place from July through November, 1998. Thanks for your help. If you need further information, please call me. cc: Well No. 12 File Without attachments: Dave Webb, Deputy City Engineer Tom Rulla, Civil Engineer Principal i S/Admin/HJ/10-20-99Memo-Well-12 Well 12 Water Quality Analysis 400 ... ?.$.;,b r•.v:.bnyT..;w, x,Jv:,,,J•n":,r: .vt},. .Yx' •:.r. vk; {k{kr:;;, +:.•ryi+•, v:Y^ Y 'kT;' %r •^'s c , }Tkk��':`k:;`. ••rY:'•, :.rY•.rrr}:u,},y,::xr•.. .3 }{ '�, ,rtkkT;{J]:.:^: P•'ty,}• tfi.\,•:.{,it ,.•} r>.:. ..Y.. ..t• .} : r•::kk#k�:k::; ,,:.y,}.,rr+•:^..,:+,:,d,::,"{?,...,:. .,v:}.^.•;.;xb.:•.^,;• ,#o t:k: C:::. :' ., ".,t'•.,..:^•.,,.,:.,..•.•....w,.:.:�::::,....,:^+ :•::.:.:::::.:.c.»,r,.';kY:'.^:Y:k:kk%'t£:.,,•::..:•::.,.r...w.::t;S.,,,:..t.Y'•, „•;� Y{}.•' y ,{ ^4:`Y,'•`.G,:: ,,.,,•.,}>}]` ]::,::•J,4,Y{.,:,:•,•J•••,:.,..• ,..:{:,,..%{•>:Rk yf",fir,i•\5.., }'• .' ¢,,, }>`k :2k::,k}>^.'•:{{:n..yy 5�. 'irr]'•>'•:i'6l.'r•. .9 �>:l Y F: x '` ;•' ,••�,•sh'L.�k{,:.,Y\bJ,:t,','k`#;'r:^'•,:y}{'.�.{,{... ..],>..Y; k{{ `)~>#k%Y•k'{;?;�T...,:•;;SY�' :kk,' ,. � k.4 ' ..;�1'••tt t••y,ti�:Y :}3,.,{x )) .,\Lr3x,:•:?�.. .;y,.^y}•,^,s"> .�.• x ��;.'3.T r ,.`',j•.{ r�. `4wfi'xJ",;}:, ,v}ytitt.,vJ•.{.k;j}if'`''`Jix } N/t}{k:.+kniv,,:kS�rv:t `y>>:' 'r, ••::,7 ^,7i{,'�• �'i,»T^Tr}E./ �%TST. ,:Y.r`.Y%:,v:r'.;f .:u{..,��\,,•"::�.}:"b kk'k0.'�,•• , {kT'v.:]"",.'•{]`err i; :{f•'S i{'t >{ 4., T'y�}- k`»,>rZx +�y�k}?,:,.,;�{ .>r�"+t;Y:�`"+i?{`�kk;r':.R?J{''k^}<��{n%- � ,�?ii '.,Y'�'`;•;:.�.•,k•`•T,{)L,k,>Y. ':\`kT,.9t;~�,`>'w^.:C` �a,,T..Y•`7,.•, •ir:•:•]!S,\0,};^•w}y]]:.f,,r,��a.,• ,+,!;;,. SQ:::,k;,•, r .#k:'k •''>:i�'•4 u �� } CYS:'C.?`?:2}��;'•��b:n:c„ ,k $ T` k^T'`•k?:k:{:,`�: '2 ..Y:;r:y.i:•.'tkC:tn, •�''+ ` +] R' {r2�,',+} tTk#T,~ y .'],� f',',r�.S.Sc:�c•,• '•:t •{;J•fr r)55{k � n;\.• %,vA�`"J:k"%h,,.:-.^;: }# sky,.! vf..{',�,r• T.. :.k2�:��:.�f` ,^ .'t•• ,ktf 'S`}~A,}`. l' ''T}Y•tvw.••!}' {.;,ti' 'R',-`k 3. . �ct<:<'». ;.;�c,k+.` `s..` y� ~aa'�xY :�,;ti',C�}'•.y k§:�.,.'Ea;+k, ,,cT3iS�, ,• s 300 {.::fig{y � , }� '$"•':, \. ',: L, .n. 250 Rog c<'i zk%�~bz>r�` .#Y v; tTa;,•�' ':��y...' #Y„'v r':i#>.i >:y:::•:.�� { :::i•E}y J:�:;,,,••.C�•,}t:;`a, z .v:,��,';i:Y`:z,, tµ't.A}nx. {fT�.`,'�.{ z: ,a ,•:ro••S?T,Y"4y.` k ,v•^:~ ' .:}{..},•. 'k;;ts r{ kY2'• h*{ •].k'a`KkT�i.}`,4EkL'L' ,>gv.,:,s, 2` ,v:>;'.: :]•{.,,'.. {..l• :k:r•; .,{k�} 3k' 200 ^z.f.} tom}z' 3N;'k?••.. t,55k'a S Yy;r .a�s g, �k ``:.:}icr,• ,`'kvas, ^.;2`Y;: a ,ikir`:•>r�r'':.5•`0,.•t. :T+k�YC$£#k ': GPM X700 ;k;•�,.' •<k,Y{Tkk„{'. {•%��'�,•. .; ,], •.cx.�:.;,,:.'r. ,;k, ,;^]sz�z„\.r..'{}•" .. vk` <"�3%c�'.3r4.'k;^ t;:>:c•<zYYzT :�:y;#i; ,k�. `>{�`.�,X•.a ,k}{;t:\ .a•,:r%?s}�xts•: ;k:Y: :sz:<.zk#:ek•xc�>x#T f;`'• r z"• .,.##:###Y::;:f:"'�v.`;#2,{ry{ :o::•�•k}•••:.ry,w.•.+cke„„{„kk>,..,;\};},\:''� •:�;k{,`;J:fk;�:.•,•�^i••''� `3T '`'•:;uk,•r.:3.,:kr';2C;Y•,k.,:.)'{;.zt.,t]J.y tYr�2Y{;;r,;{r,.,,}r.•:),: ;.:L.Y�`. }>: ^;{},.��,,uk,;�'^r •.i•'`.;>i :]}.•.:,Yr.{:'f}':r:,;;;.,>:;;}::::.z,}.:t^, •::c,>b. r.}.:,+,•r{ h:"^,:`t'•^},'tr+�',.4?:>.#;.�;Stk{k�: •kb,>��r��c� '"{ 2't > :%„fib{•,{G"js<?w:;f<'<,''�,,��,,.kr•;i�:•{�k•:;'rt`.}•`:•'.`•`:','k:Y`$,"yY•?,3:akf..:;'•r::%cL;'�•,,,;:.ky^{,�••• r. Y�u�.••^ti•.'.{>{'�;{i+.z�•?r , 2`y� ` W:. .::#:•r „>b,:,:f,,,;•,t:l ,•:r,• r k�`:..{r r;'� \'"Y�x,Y:?`t{2}::kk:":?R ,. .o.., •'L :::5r,:#;:{{;stLYr>.:}:•• r.+.,iky.>t,"Trr�Si ]k;;Gr:;�ti'k:'i ,.c{,y f,�T .k�M,k;.k.:,{;v.];rCr,:,t,J:?�{?yy- 'k k �: .'J#:{•k>k`k?' :'i n�%,'i kr'xL:.•: a%�x^tC:k!`�'`•kt+,:+• .•:.Y:•4;:.;`�, k,}y,.?}kk.••+.rt v:•T�.:,{;kCY,�.k{ q} b}}Y.:.}•+.t•,rr. ,{ tb:.N ,�. + :r: Y. .{ y ;y{Ytb,:, }{ r. h:.`R,.]:J{.{:{:L:.r,k.:.J .:\kiv;{ .J;'b .� !,{r,5 ✓` •iR }t9{;f t.>�. 3•••a{f... G.• {•:::•:•:.•:t•'Y:.,•'••tr:.i'k.,.,v 7e..�r..,'Y`�.,f..•.,•ikT{ka.•Y•:•;k:,}tv �;` 2 C'.r.;'•,2�:.:.,,�';Y^L{kY{ {',., .,....,;,: r :.:. :. ~ .; >5 4.,^•:'•irr;kt `' ;y:;l•: •�f::.l�t� �}"~>t f. •:OKt{'J:' :'•�%`4'>S.' J.',W{r:T ..:,^.{ \i]`j:;n•CY::>xk:.' l:+ 150 ^v:•}::n,r^•.ii:":T r'\+;::;{k�:',•.J i�:{Y� , :. :i.•`:i ,\w" 100 {.:tk ..? .,r%z,.^<.::N.::.:. f^ ,. !<kr:4.::.sY:;r{b :Tz >>3e : zcf�zax"{ m Odor/Color tE::•'.•ifr:%Level V ft : ::?F ' � a,<•^zx}" <` ',';c:,�: %<, ;:..by:,•"f'•�}Y �Y��r;/:i��`^ ry+.#„ .k,`7k��}-L••�k:;,x yyr:o G.at'tk# :. .'•*2`:.:a{)r:^'>S<Y{rySS{• ::'? e :{ ��;S�C,��v,•!L `M1 �„�`%��1 G: .;�• •s.,.; ,,'•��+` .T�` :x�z+�.s• t.�:. •.b;��' Moderate 50 tb�.::;{:?:t+.>4�~`,•.y:i„':�x•2�:::.�•( ,5�.. .::YL.. :bf:",f'{'k'•.�;"'L:'n:�!r,, .{::,.. :?t•, nt ':�',^tTi:. •y:%:'„'Y'Y^`S�:S'':��,:i�Wi,}�` y'C,•2 , v> �k•lk�ti}w.�,}^'\ .\ �'�irt'' '~ v: }%'{:.{}y:l >ti; •:y"t k"v 3T• 'k>r�i`4, , +G ",/ {1,k• ✓. ,�>, >� i .:4C{'{10:C•i `S' % Y•i>, i]X•. '.'� ,t 'A'C" k 3,v, '{ T {; {'::F. ,�.::..k>}{.:�. w\k,z•: J.,} k^,. ;k..a {} Slight r'�FzjiT1'S.{•.,o •�J:,v;„ .:z`>2,'},:,�.•.kk�,,•�{': � y;•2::..h�.#L:;�?:r•: .:k.k�::,•:.,.: '�•'>:. ....:..:. . ....:..:.. ..:.....:. :....:. .:.,:,.,,•:.:......:::.:...•::.:.,:;:.,....,..:::' I None elected 7/16/98 7/17/98 7118198 9/4/98 11/6/98 City of Huntington Beach Water Division General Physical Analysis Well 12 Turbidity Color UV Analysis Date Time Temp°F pH Units Units Odor 264 408 7/17/98 8.45 am 60u 7.78 0.33 <3 ND .017 .005 1:35 pm 60 7.79 0.78 <3 Slight H2 S .020 :005 7121198 8:40 am 61u 7.67 0.09 <3 ND .015 .005 " 2:45 pm 62 7.82 0.09 <3 ND .015 .003 7122/98 7:40 am 60u 7.78 0.09 <3 ND .014 .004 " 2:30 pm 62 7.57 0.15 <3 Slight H2 S .019 .005 7/23/98 8:00 am 62u 7.78 0.08 <3 Slight 112S .016 .004 " 1:15 pm 62 7.88 0.07 <3 Slight H2 S .012 .004 7/24/98 8:30 am 62u 7.75 0.08 <3 ND .017 .004 12:30 pm 62 7.82 0.06 <3 ND .016 .004 7/27/98 7:45 am 62u 7.68 0.08 <3 ND .018 .004 " 12:35 pm 64 7.85 0.04 <3 Slight H2 S .015 .003 7128/98 8:45 am 63 7.77 0.06 <3 Slight H2 S .015 .003 " 12:50 pm 62u 7.80 0.04 <3 'Siight'HZ S - ---015 .003 7/29/98 10:30 am M62u 7.83 0.08 <3 Slight H2 S .014 .003 " 1:15 pm7.81 0.05 <3 Slight H2 S .012 .002 7/30/98 8:55 am7.79 0.05 .53 Slight H2 S .014 .003 " 12:50 pm7.81 0.05 <3 Slight H2 S .013 .002 7/31/98 7:45 am 7.80 0.05 <3 ND .014 .004 " 1:00 pm 62u 7.83 0.05 <3 ND .014 .004 8/4/98 8:45 am 62 7.75 0.04 <3 ND .014 .004 " 1:00 pm 63 7.81 0.04 <3 ND .014 .002 8/5/98 8:20 am 62 7.74 0.04 <3 Slight H2 S .016 .004 1:00 pm 63u 7.71 0.04 <3 Slight H2 S .011 .001 8/6/98 8:00 am 63 7.73 0.05 <3 Slight H2 S .015 .004 " 12:30 pm 63 7.78 0.04 <3 Slight H2 S .010 .004 817/98 8:30 am 63u 7.78 0.04 <3 Slight H2 S .015 .004 1:00 pm 62u 7.80 0.02 <3 Slight H2 S .017 .003 8/10/98 8:30 am 63 7.67 0.04 <3 ND .015 .004 8/11/98 8:15 am 63 7.77 0.03 <3 ND .016 .004 1:00 pm 63u 7.81 0.03 <3 ND .013 .003 8/12/98 7:45 am 63 7.79 0.03 <3 ND .012 .003 ". 2:45 pm 63u 7.76 -0.08 <3 Slight H S .014 .003 8/13/98 8:45 am 63 7.73 0.06 <3 Slight H2 S .016 .004 " 12:15 pm 64 7.82 0.10 <3 Slight H2 S .017 .005 8/14/98 7:45 am 63u 7.74 0.03 <3 Slight H2 S .014 .004 " 1:15 pm 63u 7.78 0.02 <3 Slight H2 S - .011 .001 8118198 8:20 am 62u 7.57 0.04 <3 Slight H2 S .012 .002 " 12:30 pm 62u 7.79 0.06 <3 Slight H2 S .013 .003 8/19/98 8:15 am 62 7.70 0.05 <3 Slight H2 S .012 .003 12:15 pm 63 7.73 0.05 <3 Slight H2 S .014 .004 8/20/98 7:45 am 62 7.76 0.04 <3 Slight H2 S .015 .004 12:15 pm P63;:::l 7.76 0.05 <3 Slight H2 S .015 .002 8/21/98 8:50 am7.74 0.06 <3 ND .012 .00.3 12:15 pm7.80 0.04 <3 1 Slight H2 S .016 .003 UV AnalysFs---'m .te Tim ' • • • • • • • 264 408 . 1 • � � 1 1• ® • � 11 ..- ® 11 c _ City of Huntington Beach Water Division General Physical Analysis Well 12 Turbidity Color UV Analysis Date Time Temp. °F pH Units Units Odor 254 408 9/1/98 10:15 am 63u 7.89 0.05 <3 Slight H2 S .014 1 .004 9/2/98 7:55 am 62u 7.77 0.05 <3 Moderate H2 S .014 .003 " 12:15 pm 63u 7.82 0.06 <3 Moderate H2 S .014 .003 9/3/98 8:30 am 63 U7.83 0.06 <3 Slight H2 S .014 .003 . " 12:15 pm 64u 7.84 0.06 <3 Slight H2 S .014 .003 9/4/98 8:20 am 63u 7.82 0.07 <3 Slight H2 S .014 .003 " 1:00 pm 63u 7.84 0.22 <3 Moderate H2 S .015 .004 9/8/98 9:10 am 63u 7.71 0.05 <3 Moderate H2 S .014 .003 " 12:25 pm 64u 7.89 0.07 <3 Slight H2 S .015 .004 9/9/98 8:20 am 63u 7.72 0.05 <3 Slight H2 S .015 .004 " 12:30 pm 63u 7.82 0.05 <3 Moderate`1-12*S' .014 .001 9/10/98 8:00 am 63u 7.86 0.08 <3 Slight H2 S .015 .003 " 12:20 pm 63u 7.77 0.07 <3 Slight H2 S .015 .004 9/15/98 8:30 am 62u 7.60 0.07 <3 Slight H2 S .016 .003 9/16/98 8:20 am 63 7.76 0.07 <3 Slight H2 S .016 .003 14 12:50 pm 63 7.79 0.07 <3 Slight H2 S .016 .003 9/17/98* - - - - - - - - 9/18/98 8:10 am 62u 7.70 0.06 <3 Moderate H2 S .016 .003 " 12:30 pm 64 7.82 0.05 <3 Moderate H2 S .016 .003 9/21/98 8:55 am 62u 7.60 0.06 <3 Moderate H2 S .017 .004 " 12:30 pm 63 7.70 0.05 <3 Moderate H2 S .017 .004 9122/98 8:15 am 62u 7.75 0.07 <3 Moderate H2 S . .015 .001 " 12:20 pm 63 7.83 0.06 <3 Moderate H2 S .017 .004 9123198 7:20 am 63u 7.76 0.06 <3 Moderate H2 S .016 .004 " 12:25 pm 63 7.76 0.07 <3 Moderate H2 S .017 .003 9/24/98 9:00 am 62u 7.81 0.07 <3 Moderate H2 S .016 .005 " 12:05 pm 62 7.81 0.07 <3 Moderate H2 S. .014 .002 9/25198 8:10 am 62 7.79 0.07 <3 Moderate H2 S .015 .003 9/29/98 11:00 am 63u 7.87 0.06 <3 Moderate H2 S .015 .002 9/29/98 2:40 am . 63u 7.93 0.08 <3 Slight H2 S .012 .002 9130/98 9:10 am 63u 7.87 0.06 <3 Moderate H2 S .019 .004 2:30 pm 63 U7.86 0.07 <3 Slight H2 S .016 .004 * No tests taken 9/17/98. Attended Job Harassment Seminar in the am and the well was down for service in the afternoon. City of Huntington Beach Water Division General Physical Analysis Well 12 Turbidity Color UV Analysis Date Time Temp°F pH Units Units Odor 254 408 10/1/98 8:40 am 63u 7.89 0.05 <3 Moderate .016 .004 12:25 pm 63 7.84 0.07 <3 Slight .015 .003 10/2/98 8:25 am 63 7.87 0.06 <3 Slight .013 .002 12:30 pm 63u 7.85 0.06 <3 Slight .014 .004 10/5/98 9:25 am 63 7.73 0.05 <3 Moderate .014 .003 2:35 pm 63u 7.92 0.09 1 <3 Moderate .012 .003 1016198 8:30 am 62 7.84 0.06 <3 Moderate .012 .002 " 12:20 pm 63 7.84 0.06 <3 Moderate .011 .002 1017/98 7:35 am 62u 7.85 0.10 <3 Moderate .018 .004 " 12:45 pm 63 7.84 1 0.09 <3 Moderate .014 .003 1018/98 9:25 am 63 7.95 0.09 <3 Moderate .015 .003 " 12:35 pm 64 7.87 0.05 <3 Moderate .014 .003 10/9/90� 7:35 am 62u 7.83 0.05 <3 Slight - -.013 .003 " 12:00 pm 63u 7.85 0.04 <3 Slight .012 .003 10/13/98 8:15 am 63 7.71 0.04 <3 Slight .016 .002 12:10 pm 63u 7.75 0.04 <3 Slight .015 .004 10/14/98 8:30 am 62 7.76 0.04 <3 Slight .015 .004 " 12:30 pm 62 7.83 0.03 <3 Moderate .014 .004 10/15/98 7:45 am 62m 7.78 0.05 <3 Slight .013 .002 12:15 pm* NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10/16/98 7:30 am Well Off Well Off Well Off Well Off Well Off Well Off Well Off " . 1:45 pm 62u 7.71 0.16 <3 Slight .015 .004 10/19/98 8:10 am 61 7.78 0.06 <3 Slight .015. .004 " 12:25 pm 62 7.83 0.06 <3 Slight .013 .003 10/20/98 8:45 am 62 7.77 0.06 <3 Moderate .013 .004 " 12:05 pm 63 7.78 0.05 <3 Slight .012 .003 10/21/98 7:15 am 62 7.76 0.05 <3 Slight .021 .004 " 12:00 pm Well Off Well Off Well Off Well Off Well Off Well Off Well Off 10/27/98 9:30 am 63 7.87 0.05 <3 Moderate .011 .002 " 12:35 pm - 64 7.82 0.03 <3 Slight .012 .003 10/28/98 9:30 am 63 7.78 0.03 <3 Slight .013 .004 12:25 pm 63 7.84 0.07 <3 Slight .013 .003 10/29/98 9:35 am 63 7.80 0.02 <3 Slight .013 .003 " 1:00 pm 63 7.82 0.04 <3 Slight .012 .002 10/30/98 8:30 am 63 7.75 0.04 <3 Moderate .011 .002 12:15 pm 63u 7.79 0.22 <3 Slight .012 .002 * On 10/15/98 the well had been off for a period of time and had just been turned back on prior to my arrival to collect a sample at 12:15 pm. The discharge was too dirty to sample. City of Huntington Beach Water Division General Physical Analysis Well 12 Turbidity Color UV Analysis Date Time Temp° F pH Units Units Odor 254 408 11/2/98 9:20 am 63 7.75 0.05 <3 Slight .012 .002 12:30 pm 63v 7.89- 0.05 <3 Slight .012 .002 11/3/98 8:35 am 63v 7.80 0.04 <3 Slight .014 .003 " - <3 Slight .012 .003 12:15 pm 63 7.80 0.03 1114/98 7:40 am 63 7.77 0.05 <3 Slight 011 .003 12:05 pm 63 7.78 0.10 <3 Slight .010 .002 11/5/98 9:00 am 63v 7.74 0.06 <3 Slight .011 .002 " 12:15 m 63 7.73 0.04 <3 Slight .010 .001 1116/98 7:55 am 63 7.77 0'14 <3 Slight .014 .002 12:15 pm 63 7.75 0.04 <3 Slight .010 .002 11/12/98 9:10 am 62 7.73 0.05 <3 Slight .011 .002 " 12:15 pm 63 7.82 0.04 <3 ... Slight ......011----- -----:002--- 11/13/98 8:45 am 63 7.70 0.05 <3 Slight 011 .000 12:15 pm 64 7.80 0.06 <3 Slight .011 .000 OCT-30-90 11 .01 FROM+ 'ID. PACE 3/3 ...............�u�• VVA I CK UIS I KICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: MISC Sample Station type:MISC SAMPLE SITE Old Station Name: MISC Sample Station Sub-Type:SPECIAL STUDY SAMPLE SITE Sample Group ID: 98024476 Lab Sample No.: 98100338-01 Sample ID: 28036307 Laboratory:OCWD Sample Odte/Time:.10/12/1998 08:05:00 Analysis Requested:LABUNK Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Datefflme: 10/12/1098 10:20:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottl". 1 Sampling Method:OEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered:N Sampling Agency;HUNTINGTON BEACH Field Preserved:N Sampled By:WARD MCREYNOLDS Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program: Unknown Water Ouality Program Comments:SAMPLE FOR HB-12:WELL DEVELOPMENT SAMPLE Parameter Analysis pates Results_ Detect UmRs _ Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Unftri Value Units SUSSOL Suspended Solids 25400 10/16/1998 ct m9/L 1 mg& OISSUL Dissolved Sulfide 4500S2-D 10123/1998 0 moil. .1 mg/L Approved: yes 10 WIS98 09.54 OCVM WRVS RPT#.1951 Page: 1 DAta Aecow..EX7>:RNAL t u rNt;t �i a OCT-30-80 . 1 1 .01 FROM, 4.Urury IT VVA I tK UIS IRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: MISC Sample Station Type: MISC SAMPLE SITE Old Station Name: MISC Sample Station Sub-Type: SPECIAL STUDY SAMPLE SITE Sample Group ID: 98024488 Lab Sample No.* 98100574-01 Sample 10: 98036350 Laboratory:OCWD Sample DateTrme: 10119/1998 08:10:00 Analysis Requested:LABUNK Sample Depth(Ft): Receive DaWTlmo: 10/20/1998 08:25:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of somes: 1 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered:N Sampling Agency: HUNTINGTON BEACH Field Preserved:N Sampled¢y:JIM CORBETT Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program: Unknown Water Quality Program Commer>ts: SAMPLE FOR HS-12.WELL DEVELOPMENT SAMPLE Parameter Analysis Oates .._Results_._ _DeteotLimlts — Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units SUSSOL Suspended Solids 25400 10/23/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L OISSUL Dissolved Sulfide 4500S2-D 10/23/1998 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L Approved: Yes 10/3011998 10.02 OCWb WRAMS RP7Yk 1931 Page: 1 Oats ACCeSS:EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name:HB-12/1 State Well Number: 05S/11W-09F02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Pert Interval(ft.):265-740 Well Name: Well No.12 Aquifer. UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID:g8015271 Lab Sample No.:98070562-02 Sample ID:98023210 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Date/Time:07/16/1998 09:20:00 Analysis Requested:GENLVLI Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Date/Time:07/16/1998 11:15:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency:O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved: N Sampled By: PAT TENNANT Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: FIRST START-UP IN A WHILE;iST SAMPLE OF A TESTSERIES TAKEN @ START-UP;SLIGHT DIRTY SMELL;NOH2S ODOR;SOME IRON FLAKES Parameter Analysis Dates -Results- -Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units Repotted Values EC Electrical Conductivity 2510E 07/19/1998 546 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 0720/1998 338 mg/L I mg/L PH pH 4500H+B 07/16/1998 8.1 UNITS i UNITS Na Sodium X200.7 07/17/1998 33.3 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium X200.7 07/17/1998 3.1 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium X200.7 07/17/1998 9.9 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium X200.7 07/17/1998 61.6 mg/L .1 mg►L Fe Iron X200.7 07/17/1998 2400 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity(as CaCO3) 23208 07/16/1998 180 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide(as CaCO3) 2320E 07/16/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 07/1611W8 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 07116/19M 180 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness(as CaCO3) X200.7 07/17/1998 195 mg/L 1 mg/L Cl Chloride XI.3W.0 07/16/1998 30.7 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen Xl-=.0 07/16/1998 <.4 mg/L .4 mg/L Br Bromide Xl-=.0 07/16/1998 <.2 mg/L .2 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen X113W.0 07/16/1998 0.25 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus X1-300.0 07/16/1998 c.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate XI-300.0 07/16/1998 58.8 mg/L .5 mg/L 82 Sulfide 4500S2-D 07121/1998 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L B Boron X200.7 07/17/1998 0.15 mg/L .1. mg/L TOO Total Organic Carbon(Unfiltered) 53100L 0720/1998 0.25 mg/L .01 mg/L ODORLO Odor Range Low 21508 07/17/1998 0.0 TON 0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150E 07/17/1998 32 TON 0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number(Median) 2150E 07/17/1998 2.0 TON 0 TON ALKPHE Alkalinity-Phenolphthalein 2320E 07/16/1998 <t mg/L 1 mglL DISSUL Dissolved Sulfide 4500S2-0 07/21/1996 0 mg/L .1 mg/L Approved: Y 08/18/1998 14:46 OCWD WRMS RPTM*2156 Page: 1 Data Access: EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-1211 State Well Number. 05S/11 W-09F02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(fL):265-740 Well Name:Well No.12 Aquifer. UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID:98015271 Lab Sample No:98070562-02 Sample ID:98023210 Laboratory:OCWD Sample DatelTime:07/16/1998 09:20:00 Analysis Requested:UNKNOWN Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Date/rime:07/16/1998 11:15:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method:DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered:N Sampling Agency:O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved: N Sampled By: PAT TENNANT Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Tdle 22 Comments: FIRST START-UP IN A WHILE;1ST SAMPLE OF A TESTSERIES TAKEN @ START-UP;SLIGHT DIRTY SMELL;NOH2S ODOR;SOME IRON FLAKES Parameter Analysis Dates —Results— —Detect Limits — Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units Computed Values HCO3 Bicarbonate(as HCO3) UNKWQAN 219.4 mg/L 1.2 mg/L NO3 Nitrate UNKWQAN 1.1 mg/L .4 mg/L NO3NO2-N Nitrate+Nitrite Nitrogen UNKWQAN 0.25 mg/L .1 mg/L NO2 Nitrite UNKWQAN ND mg/L 1.3 mg1L T22CAT Title 22 Total Cations UNKWQAN 5.417 meq/L I Approved: Y 0811811998 14.45 OCWD WRMS RPT#,2166 Page: 1 Data Access: EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-1211 State Well Number. 05S/11 W-WF02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(%):265-740 Well Name:Well No.12 Aquifer. UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH parnple Group ID:98015281 Lab Sample No:9W70600-02 Sample ID:98023220 Laboratory:OCWD Sample Date/Tirne:07/17/1998 11:15:00 Analysis Requested:GENLVLI Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Daten1me:071171INS 11:45:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered:N Sampling Agency:O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved:N Sampled By: STEVE REYNOLDS Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates --Results- -Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units Reported Values _.. EC Electrical Conductivity 2510B 07/2l/1998 529 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 07/20/1998 318 mg/L 1 mg/L PH pH 4500H+B 07/17/1998 7.9 UNITS 1 UNITS Na Sodium X200.7 0722/1998 35.2 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium X200.7 07=1998 3.0 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium X200.7 07=1998 10.2 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium • X200.7 07/22/1998 62.3 mg/L A mg/L Fe Iron X200.7 07=1998 420 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity(as CaCO3) 2320E 0TM19M 173 m91L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydro)dde(as CaCO3) 2320E 07/20/1998 <t mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate(as'CaCO3) 2320B 0720/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 0720119M 173 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness(as CaCO3). X200.7 0722/1W8 198 mg/L 1 mg/L Cl Chloride X1-300.0 0720/1998 33.5 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen X1-300.0 0720/1998 <.4 mg/L A mg/L Br Bromide X1-300.0 071=1998 <.2 mg/L .2 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen Xl-=.0 07IM1998 0.32 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus X1-300.0 071=1998 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate X1.3W.0 0720/1998 55.2 mg/L .5 mg/L S2 Sulfide 450OS2-D 0721/1998 'CA mg/L .1 mg/L B Boron X200.7 071=1998 0.11 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon(Unfiltered) 531ODL 07J=IM8 0.24 mg/L .01 mg/L ODORLO Odor Range tow 2150E 07/17/1998 0.0 TON 0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150E 07/17/1998 1.0 TON 0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number(Median) 2150E 07/17/1998 0.0 TON 0 TON APCOLR Apparent Color(unfiltered) 2120E 07/1711998 3 UNITS 3 UNITS TRCOLR True Color(filtered) 2120E 07/17/1998 <3 UNITS 3 UNITS ALKPHE Alkalinity-Phenolphthalein 23208 071=1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L DISSUL Dissolved Sulfide 450OS2-D 0721/1998 <A mg1L .1 mg/L I Approved: Y 0811811998 14:45 OCWD WRMS RPr#.2156 Page: 1 Dafa Access: EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-1211 State Well Number. 05S/11 W-09F02 'Station Type:WELL CASING Well Owner. HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf interval(ft.):265-740 Well Name: Well No.12 Aquifer..UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID:98015281 Lab Sample No.:98070600-02 Sample ID:98023220 Laboratory:OCWD Sample Date/Time:07/17/1998 11:15:00 Analysis Requested:UNKNOWN Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Date/Time:07/17/1gg8 11:45:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved:N Sampled By: STEVE REYNOLDS Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates —Results— —Detect Limits — Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units :Computed Values HCO3 Bicarbonate(as HCO3) UNKWQAN 210.9 mg/L 1.2 mg/L NO3 Nitrate UNKWQAN 1.4 mg/L .4 mg/L NO3NO2-N Nitrate+Nitrite Nitrogen UNKWQAN 0.32 mg/L .1 mg/L NO2 Nitrite UNKWQAN ND mg/L 1.3 mg/L T22CAT Title 22 Total Cations UNKWQAN 5.556 meq/L Approved. y OVJS11998 14.45 OCWD WRMS RPT#.2156 Page: 1 Data Access: EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND R=SULTS Station Name: HB-12/1 State Well Number: 05S/11W-09F02 Station Type: WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(ft.): 265-740 Well Name:Well No.12 Aquifer: UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID: 98016488 Lab Sample No.: 98070677-02 Sample ID: 98026033 Laboratory:OCWD Sample Date/Time: 07/20/1998 09:30:00 Analysis Requested:GENLVLI Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Date/Time:0720/1998 13:45:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved:N Sampled By: MIKE PHILLIPS Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program: Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates -Results_ _Detect Limits _ Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 2510B 07/21/1998 558 um/cm .. A ..._. um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 07/20/1998 334 mg/L 1 mg/L pH pH 4500H+B 07/20/1998 8.0 UNITS 1 UNITS Na Sodium X200.7 07/22/1998 35.1 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium X200.7 07/22/1998 2.9 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium X200.7 07/22/1998 10.5 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium X200.7 07/22/1998 66.5 mg/L .1 mg/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity(as CaCO3) 2320E 07/2011998 162 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide(as CaCO3) 2320E 0 7/2 011 9 9 8 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 07/20/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate(as CaCO3) 2320B 07/20/1998 162 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness(as CaCO3) X200.7 07/22/1998 209 mg/L 1 mg/L Cl Chloride X1-300.0 07/20/1998 48.6 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen X1-300.0 07/20/1998 <.4 mg/L .4 mg/L Br Bromide X1-300.0 0720/1998 <.2 mg/L .2 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen X1-300.0 07/20/1998 0.28 mg1L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus X1-300.0 07/20/1998 0 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate X1-300.0 0720/1998 46.0 mg/L .5 mg/L S2 Sulfide 4500S2-D 0721/1998 0 mg/L .1 mg/L B Boron X200.7 0722/1998 0 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon(Unfiltered) 531ODL 0729/1998 0.51 mg/L .01 mg/L ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150E 0721/1998 0.0 TON 0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150E 07/21/1998 1.0 TON 0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number(Median) 2150B 07/21/1998 0.0 TON 0 TON ALKPHE Alkalinity-Phenolphthalein 2320B 07/20/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L DISSUL Dissolved Sulfide 4500S2-D 0721/1998 0 mglL .1 mg/L I Approved. Yes 08/18/1998 14:42 OCWD WRMS RPT#.1951 Page: 1 Data Access:EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-12/1 State Well Number: 05S/11W-09F02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(ft.):265-740 Well Name: Well No.12 Aquifer: UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group 10:98016513 Lab Sample No.:98070949-02 Sample ID:98028835 Laboratory:OCWD Sample Date/Time:07/28/1998 10:00:00 Analysis Requested:GENLVU Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Date/Time:07/28/1998 13:00:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Baffles:4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved: N Sampled By: MIKE PHILLIPS Field Cooled:,Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates ---Results- -Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units Reported Values EC Electrical Conductivity 2510E 07/29/1998 605 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 07/31/1998 368 mg/L 1 mg/L PH pH 4500H+B 07/28/1998 7.8 UNITS 1 UNITS Na Sodium X200.7 07/28/1998 41.3 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium X200.7 07/28/1998 2.9 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium X200.7 07/28/1998 10.5 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium X200.7 07/28/1998 67.3 mg/L .1 mg/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity(as CaCO3) 2320B 07/28/1998 163 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide(as CaCO3) 2320E 07/28/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 07128/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 07/28/1998 163 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRO Total Hardness(as CaCO3) X200.7 0728/1998 211 mg/L 1 mg/L Cl Chloride X1300.0 07/28/1998 64.8 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen X1 300.0 072SI1998 <.4 mg/L .4 mg/L Br Bromide X1-300.0 07128/1998 0.22 mg/L .2 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen X1300.0 07/28/1998 <.1 mg/L A mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus X13W.0 07/28/1998 0.5 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate X13W.0 07/28/1998 45.7 mg/L .5 mg1L S2 Sulfde 4500S2-D 08/03/1998 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L B Boron X200.7 07/28/1996 0.10 moll. .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon(Unfiltered) 531ODL 07/31/1998 0.28 mg/L .01 mg/L ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150E 07Rg/1998 0.0 TON 0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150B 0729/1998 1.0 TON 0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number(Median) 2150E 0729/1998 0.0 TON 0 TON ALKPHE Alkalinity-Phenolphthalein 2320E 07/28/1998 <t mg/L 1 mg/L DISSUL Dissolved Sulfide 4500S2-D 08/03/1998 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L i Approved: Y an2fi996 07.47 OCWD WRMS RP7#.2166 Page: 1 Data Access: EXTERNAL I ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-12/1 State Well Number: 05S/11W-09F02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(ft.): 265-740 Well Name: Well No.12 Aquifer: UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID:98016513 Lab Sample No.:98070949-02 Sample ID:98028835 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Date/Time:07/28/1998 10:00:00 Analysis Requested: UNKNOWN Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Date/Time:07/28/1998 13:00:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency:O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved: N Sampled By:MIKE PHILLIPS Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates —Results-- —Detect Limits — Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units Computed Values HCO3 Bicarbonate(as HCO3) UNKWQAN 198.7 mg/L 1.2 mg/L NO3 Nitrate UNKWQAN NO mg/L .4 mg/L NO3NO2-N Nitrate+Nitrite Nitrogen UNKWQAN NO mg/L .4 mg/L NO2 Nitrite UNKWQAN NO mg/L 1.3 mg/L T22CAT Title 22 Total Cations UNKWQAN 6.093 meq/L Approved: Y 09/02/1998 07:47 OCWD WRMs RPr#:2156 Page: ! 'Data Access: EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-12/1 State Well Number: 05S/11W-09F02 Station Type: WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(ft.): 265-740 Well Name:Well No. 12 Aquifer: UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID: 98019946 Lab Sample No.: 98080982-02 Sample ID: 98033218 Laboratory:OCWD Sample Date/Time: 08/31/1998 10:25:00 Analysis Requested:GENLVLI Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Date/Time:08/31/1998 10:45:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered:N Sampling Agency: O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved: N Sampled By: PAT TENNANT Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program: Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates ___.Results_ ,Detect Limits _ Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 2510E 09/01!1 Q98_.642 _ um/cm 1._. um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 09/01/1998 424 mg/L 1 mg/L PH pH 4500H+B 08/31/1998 7.7 UNITS 1 UNITS Na Sodium X200.7 09/02/1998 39.9 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium X200.7 09/02/1998 2.8 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium X200.7 09/02/1998 11.5 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium X200.7 09/02/1998 69.8 mg/L .1 mg/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity(as CaCO3) 2320B 08/31/1998 158 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide(as CaCO3) 2320B 08/31/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate(as CaCO3) 2320B 08/31/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 08/3111998 158 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness(as CaCO3) X200.7 09/02/1998 222 mg/L 1 mg/L Cl Chloride X1-300.0 09/01/1998 76.3 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen XI-30D.0 09/01/1998 <.4 mg/L .4 mg/L Br Bromide X1-300.0 09/01/1998 0.28 mg/L .2 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen Xi-300.0 09/01/1998 0.30 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus X1-300.0 09/01/1998 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate X1-300.0 09/01/1998 48.2 mg/L .5 mg/L B Boron X200.7 09/02/1998 0.14 mglL .1 mglL TOC Total Organic Carbon(Unfiltered) 531ODL 09/04/1998 0.51 mg/L .01 mg/L ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150B 09/01/1998 0.0 TON 0 TON ODORHI Odor Range High 2150E 09/01/1998 2.0 TON 0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number(Median) 2150B 09/01/1998 2.0 TON 0 TON ALKPHE Alkalinity-Phenolphthalein 2320B 08/31/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L DISSUL Dissolved Sulfide 4500S2-D 09/04/1998 <A mg/L .1 mg/L Approved: Yes 10/07/1998 15:02 OCWD WRMS RPT#:1951 Page: 1 Data Access:EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-1211 State Well Number: 05S/11W-09F02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well Owner. HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(R):265-740 Well Name: Well No.12 Aquifer.UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID:98019946 Lab Sample No.:98DB0982-02 Sample ID:98=218 Laboratory:OCWD Sample Datelfime:08/31/1998 10:25:00 Analysis Requested:GENLVLI Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Date/Time:o8/3111998 10:45:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method:DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered:N Sampling Agency:O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved:N Sampled By:PAT TENNANT Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates --Results-- --Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units Reported Values EC Electrical Conductivity 25108 09/01A998 642 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 09/01A998 424 mg/L 1 mg/L PH pH 4500H+B 08/3l/1998 7.7 UNITS 1 UNITS Na Sodium X200.7 09/02/1998 39.9 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium X200.7 09/0211998 2.8 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium X200.7 09/02/1998 11.5 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium X200.7 09/02/1998 69.8 mg/L .1 mg/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity(as CaCO3) 23208 08/31/1998 158 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide(as CaCO3) 2320B 08/3111998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 08/31/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate(as CaCO3) 2320B OB131/1998 158 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness(as CaCO3) X200.7 09/02/1998 222 mg/L 1 mg/L CI Chloride X1-3W.0 09101/1998 76.3 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen X1-3W.0 09/01/1998 <.4 mg/L .4 mg/L Br Bromide X13W.0 09101119M 0.28 mg/L .2 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen Xl-=.0 09/01/1998 0.30 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus X1300.0 09/01/1998 <.i mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate X1-M.0 09101/190 48.2 mglL .5 mg/L B Boron X200.7 09107JI998 0.14 mg/L .1 mg/L TOO Total Organic Carbon(Unfiltered) 63100L 091CW1998 0.51 mg/L .01 mg/L ODORLO Odor Range Low 2150B 09/01/1998 0.0 TON 0 TON ODORHi Odor Range High 2150E 09/01/1998 2.0 TON 0 TON ODOR Threshold Odor Number(Median) 2150E 09/01/1148 2.0 TON 0 TON ALKPHE Alkalinity-Phenolphthalein 23208 08/31/1998 <1 mg/L i mg/L DISSUL Dissolved Sulfide 4500S2-0 09/04/1998 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L I i Approved. Y iOIOV1998 07:34 OCIND WRMS RPT#.2156 Page: i Data Access: EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-12/1 State Well Number. 05S/l 1 W-09F02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(fL): 265-740 Well Name: Well No.12 Aquifer. UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID:98019W Lab Sample No.:98080982-02 Sample ID:98033218 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Datefnme:08/31/1998 10:25:00 Analysis Requested: UNKNOWN Sample Depth(Ft): Recelve Daterr me:O8/31/1998 10:45:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency:O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved: N Sampled By: PAT TENNANT Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:'title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates —Resutts— —Detect Limits — Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units iComputed Values HCO3 Bicarbonate(as HCO3) UNKWQAN 192.6 mg/L 1.2 mg/L NO3 Nitrate UNKWQAN 1.3 mg/L .4 mg/L NO3NO2-N Nitrate+Nitrite Nitrogen UNKWQAN 0.30 mg/L .1 mg/L NO2 Nitrite UNKWQAN ND mg/L 1.3 mg/L T22CAT Title 22 Total Cations UNKWQAN 6.237 meq/L i Approved: Y 10/08/1998 07:34 OCWD WRMS RPT#.2166 Page: 1 Data Access: EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-1211 State Well Number: 05S/11W-091`02 Station Type: WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(fL): 265-740 Well Name: Well No.12 Aquifer: UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID: 98022014 Lab Sample No.: 98090375-02 Sample 1D: 98033799 Laboratory:OCWD Sample Date/Time: 09/14/1998 10:45:00 Analysis Requested:GENLVLI Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Date/Time:09/14/1998 13:00:00 Sample Matrix: WATER No.of Bottles:3 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved: N Sampled By: SAR Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates -Results_ -Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units EC Electrical Conductivity 2510E 091/611908 631 LIM' ., ? um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 09/14/1998 424 mg/L 1 mg/L pH pH 4500H+B 09/14/1998 8.2 UNITS 1 UNITS Na Sodium X200.7 09/17/1998 09/18/1998 42.8 mglL .1 mg/L K Potassium X200.7 09/17/1998 09/18/1998 3.0 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium X200.7 09/17/1998 09/1811998 12.0 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium X200.7 09/17/1998 09/18/1998 71.3 mg/L .1 mg/L Fe Iron X200.7 09/17/1998 09/18/1998 24 ug/L 1 ug/L Mn Manganese X200.7 09/17/1998 09/18/1998 12 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity(as CaCO3) 2320B 09/14/1998 158 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide(as CaCO3) 2320B 09/14/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L CO3Ca Carbonate(as CaCO3) 2320B 09/14/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate(as CaCO3) 2320B 09/14/1998 158 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness(as CaCO3) X200.7 09/17/1998 09/18/1998 227 mg/L. 1 mg/L Cl Chloride X1-300.0 09/15/1998 81.4 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen X1-300.0 09/15/1998 <.4 mg/L .4 mg/L Br Bromide X1-300.0 09115/1998 0.27 mg/L .2 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen X1-300.0 09/15/1998 0.28 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus X1-300.0 09/15/1998 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate X1-300.0 09/15/1998 50.8 mg/L .5 mg/L B Boron X200.7 09/17/1998 09/18/1998 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon(Unfiltered) 531ODL 09116/1998 0.40 mg/L .01 mg/L ALKPHE Alkalinity-Phenolphthalein 23208 09/14/1998 <1 mg/L 1 mg/L Approved. Yes 10/0711998 15:04 OCWD WRMS RPT#.1951 Page: Data Access:EXTERNAL I ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-1211 State Well Number: 05S/1 1W.09F02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well Owner: HUNTINGTON BEACH Pert Interval(ft.): 265-740 Well Name:Well No.12 Aquifer: UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID:9W22014 Lab Sample No.:98090375-02 Sample ID:9W33799 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Daterrime:09/14/1998 10:45:00 Analysis Requested: GENLVLI Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Daterrime:09/14/1M8 13:00:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:3 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency: O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved:N Sampled By: STEVE REYNOLDS Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates --Results- -Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units iReported Values �EC Electrical Conductivity 2510B 09/16/1998 631 um/cm 1 um/cm TDS Total Dissolved Solids 2540C 09114/1998 424 mg/L 1 mg/L PH pH 4500H+B 09/1411998 8.2 UNITS 1 UNITS Na Sodium X200.7 09/1711998 09/18/1998 42.8 mg/L .1 mg/L K Potassium X200.7 09/17/19W 09/18/1998 3.0 mg/L .1 mg/L Mg Magnesium X200.7 09/17/1998 09/18/1998 12.0 mg/L .1 mg/L Ca Calcium X200.7 09/17/19M 09/18/1998 71.3 mg/L .1 mg/L Fe Iron X200.7 09/17/1998 09/1811998 24 ug/L 1 ug/L Mn Manganese X200.7 09/17/190 09/18/1998 12 ug/L 1 ug/L TOTALK Total Alkalinity(as CaCO3) 23208 09/14/1998 158 mg/L 1 mg/L OHCa Hydroxide(as CaCO3) 23208 09/14/1998 <t mg/L 1 mg1L CO3Ca Carbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 09114119N <1 mg/L 1 mg/L HCO3Ca Bicarbonate(as CaCO3) 2320E 09/14/1998 158 mg/L 1 mg/L TOTHRD Total Hardness(as CaCO3) X200.7 09/17/1998 09/18119M 227 mg/L 1 mg/L Cl , Chloride X1-3W.0 09/15/1998 81.4 mg/L .5 mg/L NO2-N Nitrite Nitrogen X1-300.0 09/15/1998 <.4 mg/L .4 mg/L Br Bromide X1-300.0 09/15/1998 0.27 mg/L .2 mg/L NO3-N Nitrate Nitrogen XI-3W.0 09/15/1998 0.28 mg/L .1 mg/L PO4-P Phosphate Phosphorus X1-300.0 09/1511998 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L (orthophosphate) SO4 Sulfate XI-3W.0 09/15/1998 50.8 mg/L .5 mg/L 8 Boron X200.7 09/17/1998 09/18/190 <.1 mg/L .1 mg/L TOC Total Organic Carbon(Unfiltered) 531ODL 09/16/1998 0.40 mglL .01 mg/L ALKPHE Atkatinity-Phenolphthalein 23208 09/14/t998 <t mg/L 1 mg/L Approved: y 10/08/1998 07.34 OCWD WRMS RPT#.2156 Page: 1 Data Access: EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HBA2/1 State Well Number: 05S/11W-09F02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well owner. HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(it.): 265-740 Well Name: Well No.12 Aquifer. UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID:98022014 Lab Sample No.:98090375-02 Sample ID:9BO33799 Laboratory: OCWD Sample Date/Time:0g/1411998 10:45:00 Analysis Requested: UNKNOWN Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Dateffirne:09/14/1998 13:00:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:3 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered: N Sampling Agency:O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved: N Sampled By: STEVE REYNOLDS Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates —Results— —Detect Limits — Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units Computed Values HCO3 Bicarbonate(as HCO3) UNKWQAN 192.6 mg/L 1.2 mg/L NO3 Nitrate UNKWQAN 1.2 mg/L .4 mg/L NO3NO2-N Nitrate+Nitrite Nitrogen UNKWQAN 0.28 mg/L .1 mg/L NO2 Nitrite UNKWQAN ND mg/L 1.3 mg/L T22CAT Title 22 Total Cations UNKWQAN 6.464 meq/L Approved. Y 1010VI'998 07.34 oCWD WRMS RPr* 2i58 Page: 1 Data Access: EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-1211 State Well Number. 05SA 1 W-09F02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well Ovmer. HUNTINGTON BEACH Pert Interval(ft.):265-740 Well Name: Well No.12 Aquifer: UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID:g8022736 Lab Sample No.:98100034-02 Sample ID:98034039 Laboratory:OCWD Sample Date/rime: 10/01/19M 11:10:00 Analysis Requested:502 Sample Depth(Ft): Receive Date/Time:10/01/1g98 13:50:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered:N Sampling Agency:O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved:Y Sampled By: STEVE REYNOLDS Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates --Results- --Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units Reported Values TOTALX Total Xylenes(m,p,&o) 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L CH3Ci Chloromethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L CH3Br Bromomethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L VNYLCL Vinyl chloride 502.2 10/02JI998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L CIETHA Chloroethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L CH2Cl2 Methylene Chloride 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L 11DCE 1,1-Dichloroethene 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 u91L 11DCA 1,1-Dichloroethane 602.2 10/02/190 ND ug/L .5 ug/L CHCI3 Chloroform 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L CCI4 Carbon tetrachloride 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L 12DCP 1,2-Dichloropropane 502.2 10/024998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L TCE Tdchloroethene 502.2 10/0211998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L 112TCA 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO UA .5 ug/L CHBr2C Dibronmhloromethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L PCE Tetrachloroethene 502.2 10/02/1998 NO, ug/L .5 ug/L CLBENZ Chlorobenzene 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 uglL 12DCB 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L 13DCB 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L 14DCB 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 502.2 10/024M NO ug/L .5 ug/L CC13F Trichloroliuoromethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L t12DCE trans-1,2 Dichloroethene 502.2 10=1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L 12DCA 1,2-Dichloroethane 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L 111TCA 1,1,1 Trichloroethane 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L CHBrCI Bromodichloromethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L t13DCP trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 502.2 .10/0211998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L c13DCP cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 602.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L BENZ Benzene 502.2 10102/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L CHBr3 Bromofonn 502.2 10/0211M ND ug/L .5 ug/L 1122PC 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L TOLD Toluene 502.2 1OW1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L EtBENZ Ethylbenzene 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L C13F3E Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon 113) 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L MEK Methyl Ethyl Ketone(MEK) 502.2 10/02/1g98 ND ug/L 5 ug/L MIRK Methyl Isobutyi Ketone(MIRK) 502.2 10/0211998 ND ug/L 5 ug/L 82CLEE bls(2-chloroethyl)ether 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L 5 ug/L CC12F2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L j 22DCP 2,2-Dichloropropane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L c12DCE cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L i Approved: Y 10XII/1998 07.34 OCWD WRMS RPT#:2166 Page: 1 Data Access: EXTERNAL ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT SAMPLE INFORMATION AND RESULTS Station Name: HB-1211 State Well Number. 05S/11W-09F02 Station Type:WELL CASING Well Owner. HUNTINGTON BEACH Perf Interval(fL):265-740 Well Name:Well No.12 Aquifer: UNDEFINED City: HUNTINGTON BEACH Sample Group ID:98022736 Lab Sample No.:98100034-02 Sample ID:9W34039 Laboratory:OCWD Sample Daterrime: 10/O1Y1W8 11:10:00 Analysis Requested:502 Sample Depth(Ft): Receive DateMme:10/01/1998 13:50:00 Sample Matrix:WATER No.of Bottles:4 Sampling Method: DEDICATED PUMP Field Filtered:N Sampling Agency:O.C.WATER DISTRICT Field Preserved:Y Sampled By: STEVE REYNOLDS Field Cooled:Y Monitoring Program:Title 22 Comments: Parameter Analysis Dates -Results= -Detect Limits - Abbr Name Method Extract Analysis Value Units Value Units Reported Values CH2BrC Bromochloromethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L 11DCP 1,1-Dichloropropene 502.2 10/0211998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L CH2B2 Dibromomethane 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L 13DCP 1,3-Dichloropropane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L EDB 1,2-Dibromoethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L 1112PC 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L o-XYL o-Xylene 502.2 10/0211998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L STYR Styrene 502.2 10/0211998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L ISPBNZ Isopropylbenzene 502.2 10/0211998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L 123TCP 1,2,3-Trichioropropane 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L PRPBNZ Propylbenzene 502.2 10/021998 NO, ug/L .5 ug/L BRBENZ Bromobenzene 602.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L 135TMB 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 502.2 10/0211998 NO ug/L .5 u91L 2CLTOL 2-Chlorotoluene 502.2 10/02/1998 N0 . ug/L .5 ug/L 4CLTOL 4-Chlorotoluene 502.2 10/0211998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L tBBENZ tert-Butyibenzene 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L 124TMB 1,2,4-Tdmethylbenzene 502.2 10102119W ND ug1L .5 ug/L s8BENZ sec-Butylbenzene 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L 41PTOL 4-Isopropyttoluene 502.2 10/02N998 ND uglL .5 ug/L nBSENZ n-Butylbenzene 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L DBCP 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L 124TCB 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L HCIBut Hexachlorobutadiene 502.2 10/0211998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L NAP Naphthalene 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L 123TCB 1,2,3-Tdchlorobenzene 502.2 10/02/1998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L MP-XYL m,p-Xylene 502.2 10/02A998 NO ug/L .5 ug/L TTHMs Total THMs 502.2 10/024998 ND ug/L .5 ug/L MTBE Methyl tert-butyl ether 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L 1 ug/L ETBE Ethyl tert-butyl ether 502.2 10/0211998 NO ug/L 1 ug/L TAME Tert-Amyl-methyl ether 502.2 10107JI WS ND ug/L 1 ug/L DIPS Diisopropyl ether 502.2 10/02/1998 ND ug/L 1 ug/L Approved: Y 1010811998 07.34 OCWD WRMS RPT#:2156 Page: 2 Data Access: EXTERNAL _ TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE-TUSTIN,CALIFORNIA 92780-7008 PHONE(714)730-6239-FAX(714)730-6462 REPORT RECEIVED DEPT.Or PUBLIC WORKS City of Huntington Beach Date: 07/23/98 19001 Huntington St. J U L 3 01998 P.O. Box 190 Received: 07/20/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 WATER Attn: Jim Corbett HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA Lab No. 202156-2 Samples: Twelve Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 18th- Ed:,---1992 Method.:.922313 Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date: 07/20/98 Analysis Date/Time: 07/20/98 2 :30 PM Completion Date/Time: 07/21/98 3 :00 PM (Coliform Tests) 07/22/98 3 :00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 48 Hrs . @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 7:25 AM Well #12 Absent* 50 2. 7:35 AM OC-35 Absent <5 3 . 7:40 AM Well #7 Absent <1* 4. 7:45 AM Well #4 Absent <1* 5. 7:50 AM Well #1 Absent <1* 6. 8 :00 AM Well #6 Absent <1* 7. 8 :10 AM Well #10 Absent <1* 6. 8:15 AM OC-9 Absent <1* 9. 8:25 AM Well 9 Absent <1* 10. 8:30 AM Well 5 Absent <1* 11. 8:40 AM Dyke Well Absent 5 12. 8 :55 AM Overmeyer Res (S) Absent 5 *None detected. "Colony-forming units . Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,Investigated and is not necessarily Indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whorn it is addressed and upon the condition that it is not to be used,in whole or in part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE•TUSTIN,CALIFORNIA 92780-7008 PHONE(714)730-6239•FAX(714)730-6462 REPORT City of Huntington Beach Date: 07/3.1/98 19001 Huntington St . P.O. Box 190 Received: 07/27/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett Lab No. : 202180-2 Samples: Twelve Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the :ExFrnination of Water and Wastewater, 18th_ Ed. ,...1992 Method 922313 Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date: 07/27/98 Analysis Date/Time: 07/27/98 1 :30 PM Completion Date/Time : 07/28/98 2 :00 PM (Coliform Tests) 07/29/98 2 : 00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 48 Hrs. @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 8:10 AM Well #1 Absent* <1* 2. 6:50 AM Well #5 Absent <1* 3. 7:15 AM Well #6 Absent <1* 4. 8:00 AM Well #7 Absent <1* 5. 6 :40 AM Well #9 Absent <1* 6. 7:05 AM Well #10 Absent <1* 7. 7:45 AM Well #12 Absent <i* 8. 6:30 AM Dyke Well Absent 5 9. 6:55 AM OC 9 Absent <1* 10. 7:55 AM OC35 Absent <1* 11. 5:50 AM Overmeyer I Absent 15 12. 6:20 AM Overmeyer II Absent <1* *:None detected. ,**Colony-forming units. Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and is not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that it is not to be used,in whole or In part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these laboratories. TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE•TUSTIN,CALIFORNIA 92780-7008 PHONE(714)730-6239•FAX(714)730-6462 REPORT City of Huntington Beach Date: 08/07/98 19001 Huntington St. P.O. Box 190 Received: 08/03/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett Lab No. : 202213-2 Samples: Eleven Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, i8th Ed. , -1992--Meth-oa_9223B,-____ Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date: 08/03/98 Analysis Date/Time: 08/03/98 1:30 PM Completion Date/Time: 08/04/98 2:30 PM (Coliform Tests) 08/05/98 2:30 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 49 Hrs . @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 7:45 AM Well ##12 Absent* 10 2. 7:55 AM OC-35 Absent 5 3. 8:00 AM Well ##7 Absent <1* 4. 8:05 AM Well #4 Absent <1* S. 8:10 AM Well #1 Absent <1* 6. 8:15 AM Well #6 Absent <1* 7. 8:30 AM Well #10 Absent <1* 8. 8 :35 AM OC-9 Absent <1* 9. 8:40 AM Well 5 Absent <1* 10. 8 :45 AM Dyke Well Absent <1* 11. 9 :00 AM Overmeyer Res (N) Absent 25 *None detected. **Colony-forming units. Respectfully submitted, TRRUUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. v Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and is not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar Products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client fn when it is artrtrassed and upon the condition that it is not to be used,in whole or in part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE•TUSTIN,CALIFORNIA 92760.7008 PHONE(714)730-6239•FAX(714)730-6462 REPORT City of Huntington .Beach R E C E I V E D Date: 08 14 98 19001 Huntington St. DEPT.OF PU9 IC YaO IKS / / Huntington9Beach, 92648 AUG 2 1 1999 Received: 08/10/98 Attn: Jim Corbett Lab No. : 202246-2 �;dP7eR C'fViSiC,iv Samples: Thirteen Drinking Waters-Sourc*gyTiN`(3ION BEACH'CA Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223B Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date: 08/10/98 Analysis Date/Time: 08/10/98 3 :30 PM Completion Date/Time: 08/11/98 4 :00 PM (Coliform Tests) 08/12/98 3 :30 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 48 Hrs. @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 8 :00 AM Well #1 Absent* <5 2. 8:15 AM Well #4 Absent <1* 3 . 7:25 AM Well #5 Absent <1* 4. 7:50 AM Well #6 Absent <1* 5. 8:20 AM Well #7 Absent <1* 6. 7:45 AM Well #10 Absent <1* 7. 8 :30 AM Well #12 Absent <1* 8. 7:15 AM Dyke Well Absent 30 9. 7:35 AM OC9 Absent <1* 10. 8:08 AM OC35 Absent <1* 11. 9:00 AM OC44 Absent <1* 12. 6:48 AM Overmeyer I Absent 5 13. 6 :40 AM Overmeyer II Absent <1* *None detected. "Colony-forming units . Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, NC. �a Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and Is not necessarily Indicative of the quality or condition of apparently Identical or similar products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client '^"'`^^is "+A•^^^^4 �nH imon the condition that it is not to be used,in whole or in part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENv1RONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 14201 FRANKUN AVENUE•TUSTIN,CAUFORNIA 92780-7008 $A PHONE(714)730-6239•FAX(714)730.64ti2 REPORT City of Huntington Beach Date: 08/20/98 19001 Huntington St. P.O. Box 190 Received: 08/1.7/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett Lab No. : 202279-2 Samples: Twelve Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HE) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223B Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date: 08/17/98 Analysis Date/Time: 08/17/98 3 :30 PM Completion Date/Time: 08/18/98 4 :00 PM (Coliform Tests) 08/19/98 4 :00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 48 Hrs. @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 7:30 AM Well #12 Absent* <5 2. 7:45 AM OC-35 Absent 5 3. 7:48 AM Well #7 Absent <1* 4. 7:50 AM Well #4 Absent <1* 5. 7:55 AM Well #1 Absent <1* 6. 8:10 AM Well #6 Absent <1* 7. 8:15 AM Well #10 Absent <1* 8. 8:20 AM OC-9 Absent <1* 9. 8,:30 AM Well #9 Absent 25 10. 8:35 AM Well #5 Absent <1* 11. 8:45 AM Dyke Well Absent 15 12. 9:00 AM Overmeyer (S) Absent <1* *None detected. **Colony-forming units . Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. S Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist 1 This report applies only to the sample,or samples,Investigated and is not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar Products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that it is not to be used,in whole or in part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these faboratories. TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 14201 FRANWJN AVENUE-Tu N,CALIFORNIA 92780-7008 ,A PHONE(714)730.6239-FAX(714)7306462 REPORT RECEIVED City of Huntington Beach D E P Ti 0 F PLU B Ll 0 W 0FRIKS Date: 08/27/98 .19001 Huntington St. P.O. Box 190 SEP 0 41998 Received: 08/24/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim CorbettON Lab No. : 202308-2 `rY.. . H'01+r:0,'i Samples: Fourteen Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223B Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date: 08/24/98 Analysis Date/Time: 08/24/98 3 :00 PM Completion Date/Time : 08/25/98 4 :30 PM (Coliform Tests) 08/26/98 4 :30 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 48 Hrs. @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 8:45 AM Well #1 Absent* <1* 2. 8:35 AM Well #4 Absent 5 3. 7:30 AM Well #5 Absent 5 4. 7 :50 AM Well #6 Absent <1* 5. 8 :40 AM Well #7 Absent <1* 6. 7:23 AM Well #9 Absent <5 7. 7:45 AM Well #10 Absent <1* i 8. 8:10 AM Well #12 Absent 5 I 9. 7:10 AM Dyke Well Absent <1* 10. 7:35 AM OC-9 Absent <1* 11. 8:30 AM OC-35 Absent <1* 12 . 7:00 AM OC-44 Absent <1* 13 . 6 :45 AM Overmeyer I Absent <1* 14. 6 :40 AM Overmeyer II Absent <1* *None detected. "Colony-forming units. Respectfully submitted, TRUESDDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and is not necessarily Indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report Is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that it Is not to be used,In whole or in part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these laboratories. TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established f931 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE•TUSTIN.CALIFORNIA 92780-7008 REPORT PHONE(714)730-6239•FAX(714)730-6462 - R ►3CEIVED DEP I.OF PUBLIC WORKS City of Huntington Beach Date: 09/03/98 19001 Huntington St. S EP 0 41998 P.O. Box 190 Received: 08/31/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 w., E-2i IvISION Attn: Jim Corbett HUMIN',00(4 BEACH.CA Lab No. : 202334-2 Samples: Thirteen Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APRA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223B Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date: 08/31/98 Analysis Date/Time: 08/31/98 1:30 PM Compl.ettion Date/Time: 09/01/98 2 :30 PM (Coliform Tests) 09/02/98 5 :00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 51 Hrs. @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 7:30 AM Well #12 Absent* 5 2. 7:42 AM OC-35 Absent <5 3. 7:47 AM Well #7 Absent <5 4. 7:49 AM Well #4 Absent <1* S. 8:00 AM Well #1 Absent <1* 6. 8:10 AM Well #6 Absent <5 7. 8:18 AM Well #10 Absent <1* S. 8:25 AM OC-9 Absent <5 9. 8:30 AM Well 9 Absent 5 10. 8:40 AM Well 5 Absent <1* 11. 8:48 AM Dyke Well Absent <1* 12. 9 :05 AM OC-44 Absent <1* 13. 9 :20 AM Overmeyer Res. Absent <1* *None detected. "Colony-forming units. Respectfully submitted, TRUES,D^AIL LABORATORIES, Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and is not necessarily Indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that It is not to be used,in whole or in part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these laboratories. TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE.AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE•TUSTIN,CALIFORNIA 92780-7008 PHONE(714)730-6239•FAX(714)730-6462 REPORT City of Huntington Beach Date: 09/12/98 19001 Huntington St . P.O. Box 190 Received: 09/08/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett Lab No . : 202378-2 Samples : Twelve Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,_ 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223B Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date: 09/08/98 Analysis Date/Time : 09/08/98 2 :00 PM Completion Date/Time: 09/09/98 3 :00 PM (Coliform Tests) 09/10/98 4 :00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 50 Hrs . @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME& LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 9 :20 AM Well ##1 Absent* 5 2. 8 : 58 AM Well ##4 Absent 15 3 . 10 :10 AM Well #5 Absent 5 4. 9 :30 AM Well #6 Absent <1* 5. 9 :05 AM Well #7 Absent <1* 6. 10 : 00 AM Well #9 Absent <1* 7. 9 :50 AM Well #10 Absent <1* 8. 9 :10 AM Well #12 Absent 10 9. 10 :20 AM Dyke Well Absent 5 10. 8 :50 AM OC-5 Absent 5 11. 7 :05 AM OC-44 Absent <1* 12. 6 :50 AM Overmeyer II Absent <1* *None detected. **Colony-forming units. Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, ..INC. Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and is not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that it is not to be used,in whole or In part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these laboratories. f TRIJESDA9L LA63 E T(.)►s Vl� INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 v g:' 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE•TUSTIN.CALIFORNIA 92780-7008 PHONE(714)730-6239•FAX(714)730-6462 REPORT City of Huntington Beach Date: 09/18/98 19001 Huntington St . P.O. Box 190 Received: 09/14/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett Lab No. : 202407-2 Samples: Ten Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223B Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date: 09/14/98 Analysis Date/Time : 09/14/98 3 : 00 PM Completion Date/Time : 09/15/98 4 :00 PM (Coliform Tests) 09/16/98 3 :00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 48 Hrs . @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 7 :20 AM Well #12 Absent* 10 2 . 7:45 AM OC-35 Absent 5 3 . 7 :53 AM Well #7 Absent <1* 4. 7:55 AM Well #4 Absent <1* 5. 8 :00 AM Well #1 Absent <1* 6. 8 :10 AM Well #6 Absent <1* 7. 8:20 AM Well #7 Absent <1* 8. 8:30 AM OC-9 Absent <1* 9. 8 :40 P.M Well #9 Absent 5 10. 8:50 AM Dyke Well Absent <1* *None detected. "Colony-forming units . Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and is not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that it is not to be used,in whole or In part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these laboratories. TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE•TUSTIN.CALIFORNIA 92780-7008 ... .. PHONE(714)730 6239•FAX(714)730-6462 REPORT City of Huntington Beach Date : 10/01/98 19001 Huntington St . P.O. -Box 190 Received: 09/28/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett Lab No. : 202457-2 Samples: Eleven Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223B Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date : 09/21/98 Analysis Date/Time : 09/21/98 1 :30 PM Completion Date/Time : 09/22/98 3 : 00 PM (Coliform Tests) 09/23/98 3 : 00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 49 Hrs . @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME& LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 7:10 AM Overmeyer Absent* <1* 2. 7:50 AM Dyke Absent 5 3. 8 :05 AM Well #9 Absent 5 4. 8:15 AM Well #5 Absent <5 5. 8 :25 AM Well #10 Absent <1* 6. 8:35 AM Well #6 Absent <1* 7. 8:45 AM Well #7 Absent <5 S. 8:55 AM Well #4 Absent <5 9. ' 9:05 AM Well #12 Absent <5 10. 9:15 AM Well #1 Absent <1* 11. 9:30 AM OC-9 Absent <1* *None detected. **Colony-forming units . Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and is not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar iproducts. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that it is not to be used,in whole or in part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these laboratories. TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. d INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE•TUSTIN,CALIFORNIA 92780-7008 PHONE(714)730-6239•FAX(714)730-6462 REPORT : C V P_ D City of Huntington Beach 1)EFT.0FPL1Q1L1CW01K33 Date : 10/08/98 19001 Huntington St . OCT 2 3 1998 P.O. Box 190 Received: 10/05/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett '`'!� !dFACAC EEI Ca Lab No. . 202487-2 NJ:�lTI :: G:v Samples: Twelve Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223B Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date : 10/05/98 Analysis Date/Time: 10/05/98 1 :30 PM Completion Date/Time : 10/06/98 2 :30 PM (Coliform Tests) 10/07/98 3 :00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 49 Hrs . @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CPU**/ML 1. 9 :55 AM Well #1 Absent* <1* 2. 9 :40 AM Well #4 Absent 10 3 . 10 :35 AM Well #5 Absent <1* 4. 10:05 AM Well #6' Absent <1* 5. 9:45 AM Well #7 Absent <1* 6 . 10 :30 AM Well #9 Absent <5 7. 10:10 AM Well #10 Absent <1* 8. 9:25 AM Well #12 Absent 5 9. 10 :45 AM Dyke Well Absent 50 10. 8 :00 AM Overmeyer II Absent <1* 11. 10:20 AM OC-9 Absent <1* 12. 8 :15 AM OC-44 Absent <1* *None detected. "Colony-forming units . Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and is not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that it is not to be used.in whole or In part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these laboratories. v RUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 •;-;:';'�` 14201 FRANKLIN AVENUE•TUSTIN.CALIFORNIA 92780-7008 \% PHONE(714)730-6239•FAX(714)730-6462 REPORT IOF! City of Huntington Beach =T,OF PUBLIC WORKS- Date : 10/16/98 19001 Huntington St. 0 CT 2 21998 P.O. Box 190 Received: 10/12/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett �'!A!`.Fj�?I1�1SiL)t� Lab No. : 202516-2 !-iu,i li C��'�i�6Eh.CH,CA Samples: Eight Drinking Waters-Sources 'Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223B . Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count SM Method 9215B Collection Date: 10/12/98 Analysis Date/Time: 10/12/98 2 : 00 PM Completion Date/Time: 10/13/98 3 :00 PM (Coliform Tests) 10/14/98 3 : 00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 49 Hrs . @350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LOCATION PRESENCE/ABSENCE PER 100 ML CFU**/ML 1. 7:45 AM OC-35 Absent* <1* 2. 7:50 AM Well #7 Absent <1* 3. 7 :55 AM Well #4 Absent <1* 4. 8 : 05 AM Well #12 Absent <5 5. 8 :20 AM OC-9 Absent <1* 6. 8 :35 AM OC-44 Absent 5 7. 8 :50 AM Overmyer Res. (S) Absent <5 8. 10:40 AM Goldenwest & Summit Absent 5 *None detected. **Colony-forming units . Respectfully submitted, TRUEESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. Karl W. Schiller, M.S . Chief Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and is not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar products. As a mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that it is not to be used,in whole or In part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these laboratories. 11,1)/26/1996 01:11 714-730-6462 TRUESDAIL LABS PAGE 04 TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE.AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Established 1931 Ilk 14201 FRAWLIN AVENUE•TUSTIN.CALIFOANIA 92780-70M PHONE(714)730-6239 FAX(714)730-6482 REPORT City of Huntington Beach Date: 10/26/98 19001 Huntington St. P.O. Box 190 Received: 10/19/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett Lab No. : 202530-2 Samples: Seven Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation! Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APRA Standard Methods for the gxamination of Water and Wastewater. 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223E Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count 0 Method 9215B Collection Date : 10/19/98 Analysis Date/Time: 10/19/98 2 :30 PM Completion Date/Time: 10/20/98 3 :00 PM (Coliform Tests) 10/21/98 5 :30 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 51 Hrs. 0350C) REBULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LQM20N ,FRESENGE/ABSENCE_PER 100 ML CFU!*/DM, 1. 7:30 AM Well #6 Absent* 15 2. 8 :30 AM Well #7 Absent 5 3. 8 :10 AM Well #12 Absent 5 4. 7:15 AM OC-9 Absent 120 5 . 8:20 AM OC-35 Absent 5 6. 9:20 AM OC-44 Absent <5 7. 7:00 AM Overmyer II Absent <5 *None detected. **Colony-forming units. Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the sample,or samples,investigated and Is not neUCiarity Irdlcative of the quality ar condition of apparently identical or similar -products. As A mutual protection to clients,the public,and these laboratories,this report Is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom It Is addressed and upon the condition that It Is not to be used,In whole at In part,in any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these laboratories. ., r1 r -Ctio� IKUtSU11L LutsS PAGE 04 TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING.FORENSIC SCIENCE.AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES Estebllat*d 1931 14201 FRANKLRI AVENUE TUSTIN.CAuFORNIA 92780-7006 REPORTPHONE(714)730-8238•FAX(714)730.6462 City of Huntington Beach Date: 10/30/98 19001 Huntington St. P.O. Box 190 Received: 10/26/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett Lab No. : 202533-2 Samples: Five Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collectibn: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Teat APHA Standard Methods for -the Examination of Water and Wastewater., lath Ed. , 1992 Method 9223E Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count 0 Method 9215E Collection Date: 10/26/98 Analysis Date/Time: 10/26/98 3 :00 PM Completion Date/Time: 10/27/98 3 :00 PM (Coliform Tests) 10/28/98 4 :00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 49 Hrs. 0350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LO=IQN PRESENCEIABSERCE PER 100 HL CFO** NL 1. 8 :00 AM Well #12 Absent* 10 2. 8:15 AM OC-35 Absent <1* 3. 8 :20 AM OC-9 Absent <1* 4. 8 :45 AM OC-44 Absent 5 5. 9:00 AM Overmeyer Res. Absent 5 *None detected. **Colony-forming units. Respectfully submitted, TRUES``DAIL LABORATORIES, INC. sV Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This report applies only to the serriple,or samples.Invoil ipated and Is not necessarily indlcallve of the quality or oondldon of apparently Identical or similar products. As a mutus protection to eliente.the public,and these laboratories,this report Is submitted and accepted for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that It Is not to be used,in wholo or In pan.in any advenisinp or publleity matter without prior written authbrization Iron these laboratories. 1;J/26/1992 01:11 714-730-6462 TRUESDAIL LABS PAGE 04 TRUESDAIL LABORATORIESt INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING,FORENSIC SCIENCE,AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES EelebksheQ f 93 r 14201 FRANKtPHNEE AVENUE14)730-9239 FAAX(71IA 4)7330.64922 REPORT City of Huntington Beach Date: 10/26/98 19001 Huntington St. P.O. Box 190 Received: 10/19/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbett Lab No. : 202530-2 Samples: Seven Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APRA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223E Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count EM Method 9215B _ Collection Date: 10/19/98 --- --- - - - - -- Analysis Date/Time: 10/19/98 2 :30 PM Completion Date/Time: 10/20/98 3 :00 PM (Coliform Tests) 10/21/98 5:30 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 51 Hre. 0350C) RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORK BACTERIA PLATE COUNT TIME & LQ�T'T PRESENCE/ABSENCE-PER 100 ML CPU**/ML 1. 7:30 AM Well #6 Absent* 15 2. 8:30 AM Well #7 Absent 5 3. 8:10 AM Well #12 Absent 5 4. 7:15 AM OC-9 Absent 120 5. 8 :20 AM OC-35 Absent 5 6. 9:20 AM OC-44 Absent <5 7. 7:00 AM Overmyer II Absent <5 *None detected. **Colony-forming units. Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This taport applies only to the sample.or samples,Investlgatod and Is not necocearlly Inpolleative of the quality or condition of apparently identical or similar ent to whom ItAs a Is addresseal d and Upon the condition Pthati it and n of to belaboratories. used!In whole report In part, nbany ad ert s advertising or publiciityematter without houe prior w Of the ritten Authorization from these laboratories. 1ui30i199B 00:00 714-731)-h46' TRUESDAIL LABS PAGE 04 TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. INDEPENDENT TESTING.FORENSIC SCIENCE.AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES EefaWlet Pd 1Ij I 14201 FItANKLIN AVENUE TUSTIN,CAUFORN1A 02700-7008 PHONE(71A)730-M9•FAX(714)730.64.62 REPORT City of Huntington Reach Date: 10/30/98 19001 Huntington St. P.O. Box 190 Received: 10/26/98 Huntington Beach, 92648 Attn: Jim Corbott Lab No. : 202533-2 Samples: Five Drinking Waters-Sources Sample Collection: Jim Corbett (HB) P.O. #226710A Investigation: Chromogenic Substrate Coliform Test APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Ed. , 1992 Method 9223E Colilert; Heterotrophic Plate Count 0 Method 9215E Collection Date: 10/26/98 Analysis Date/Time: 10/26/98 3 :00 PM Completion Date/Time: 10/27/98 3 :00 PM (Coliform Teets) 10/28/98 4 :00 PM (Plate Counts, PCA, 49 Kra. 0350C) RE ULTS SAMPLE NUMBER COLIFORM BACTERIA PLAT$ COUNT ,rIMB & LQ=j PRESENCE/ABSE CA PER 100 ML CFV**/ML 1. 8:00 AM Well #12 Absent* 10 2. 8:15 AM OC-35 Absent <1* 3. 8:20 AM OC-9 Absent <1* 4. 8:45 AM OC-44 Absent 5 5. 9:00 AM Overmeyer Res. Absent 5 *None detected. **Colony-forming units. Respectfully submitted, TRUESDAIL LABORATORIES, INC. Sherron Leno Senior Microbiologist This repeK app:tea ont�to the Sample,or samples.InveStlgated and In not necessarily indicative of the quality or condition of apparently Identical or simllar products. AS a mutua protection to eliente,the public,and these laboratories.this report Is submitted and accepted for the exclusive ueo of the Client to whom it is addressed and upon the condition that It Is not to be used,in whole or in part.In any advertising or publicity matter without prior written authorization from these laboratories. Attachment E Storm Drain Connection 3 40.00' � NOTE: BEARINGS PER TRACT I I II MAP No. 4370 32.00' I i 20.00' N 40' 24' 39" W CENTER LINE U.S. NAVY 0�2 � •. 5° i i RAILROAD TRACKS = N 40' 25' 39" W i I PIPE DATA I D p ,,90' 00� 00" , N ! � N 0 o 0 s � r R = 40 N x I n at a � `; M LA = 62.83' T = 40.00 ID zn 2 ao' Z �j RAILROAD RAILROAD R/W z I'"''r_ ''�;�� R/W OWN Exiting 60" R.C.P. FL.=(10.27) _ _ _ N 40' 25' 39" W `' '^ ~!• Construct 59.90' � 6.00 W © w Construct of 18" R.C.P. I J.S. Type "E" Construct Stcndpipe ' o �� Per Pity Std. 314 A.C.= 21.73 42" R.C.P. or Nm �v C=5', 5=12.86 80.00, 48" Conc. M.H. Rings v� i Zv i 32.50' 30.00' 42.00' 8.00' ' U I �+ 12.00' 30.00' .7 w J I W Z 3 I Lti U Q ~ I ` W W Z I t— m Uj Z < w } Z Q Z Z J —i V W "v Q J ofz o_ ; LLJ� 0 LLJN z Of z >- a v C ! z U 3 z ~ 01 U U Z . Qi U < O = W W t p i Q \ j U Vertical Control: IH-141-82 m U Elevation.= 23.355 ® t WATER WELL N o . 12 I M P . I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STANDPIPE DETAIL GALVANIZED GRATE TOP OF STANDPIPE ELEV. = 24.00 DIA. = 42" or 48" R.C.P. w Q Z ' . • 0 LJ a �. • 4 M 0 m e Q STANDPIPE III I I S TTf�I>=1T I I II IT�I 11= GALVANIZED GRATE FL = 13.43 a• » 2Z SLOPE TO •.• 18 R. C.P. DRAIk ENTRANCE ° --mat.— RATE = 1% "�— ..° .. T 4" s WATER WELL No . 12 IMP . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Attachment F Sample Insurance Certificate Certificate of Insurance Agency Name and Address: THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUES AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW. Insured's Name and Address: Companies Affording Coverage COVERAGES: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OFANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS.EXCLUSIONS,AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICES. � p i o M °�eo`�uc' Poet ,c�„�For�cY -- . � =, �� -ti b«,xw' . +w ..�, - :3 + 'r=�;®ncc y, :'� �... w1-�".p,�''`.}"' 'st?•r'�',r- -tT _ i�lNSUE2aiNCE,��.IIU.MBER ;;EFEEC=DACE 1IMITS1 , � GENERAL LIABILITY General Aggregate — $ [ ] COmml,Gen.Liability Products-Com/Ops Agg. $ [ ] Claims Made Personal r3 Adv.Injury $ [ ] Occurrence Each Occurrence $ [ ] Owner's&Contractors Protective Fire Damage(any one fire) $ [ ] Contractual Liability Other $ AUTO LIABILITY Combined Single Limit $ [ j A'ny Automobile [ ] All owned autos Bodily Injury(per person) [ ] Scheduled autos g [ ] Hired autos Bodily Injury(per accident [ ] Non-owned autos $ [ ] Garage liability [ ] Property Damage $ EXCESS LIABILITY [ ] Umbrella Form Each Occurrence [ ] Other than Umbrella Form .Aggregate WORKERS' `Statutory Limits: COMPENSATION Each Accident $ AND EMPLOYERS' Disease-Policy Limit $ ` LIABILITY Disease-Each Employee $ OTHER: Description of Operations/LocationsNehicies/Restrictions/Special Items: Certificate Holder: CANCELLATION: SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICES BE CANCELED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. IL AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Date DOC.#248880 ATTACHED TO AND FORMING PART OF CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE NO.- CONS ERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY SECTION POLICY NO. It is hereby understood and agreed the City of_Huntington Beach, its agents, officers, and employees are added as an additional insured under this policy but only insofar as.their legal liability arises out of the operations of the Named Insured. DATED: Authorized Representative i i Attachment G Sample City Contract SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND FOR INSTALLATION OF WATER WELL NO. 12 PUMP AND FACILITIES (CC No. 1119) THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of 2000, by and between the City of Huntington Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and , a corporation,hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT." WHEREAS, CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to provide consulting services for Water Well No. 12 Pump and Facilities installation(CC 1119); and Pursuant to documentation on file in the office of the City Clerk, the provisions of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code, Chapter 3.03, relating to procurement of professional service contracts have been complied with; and CONSULTANT has been selected to perform said services, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: 1. WORK STATEMENT CONSULTANT shall provide all services as described in the Request for Proposal ("RFP"), and CONSULTANT's Proposal dated (both of which are hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A"), which are attached hereto and incorporated into this AGREEMENT by this reference. These services shall sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "PROJECT." 1 agree/fomVprofsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE CONSULTANT hereby designates who shall represent it and be its sole contact and agent in all consultations with CITY during the performance of this AGREEMENT. 2. CITY STAFF ASSISTANCE CITY shall assign a staff coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the performance of this AGREEMENT. 3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE Time is of the essence of this AGREEMENT. The services of CONSULTANT are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this AGREEMENT and all tasks specified in Exhibit "A" shall be completed no later than from the date of this AGREEMENT. These times may be extended with the written permission of CITY. The time for performance of the tasks identified in Exhibit "A" are generally to be shown in the Scope of Services on the Work Program/Project Schedule. This schedule may be amended to benefit the PROJECT if mutually agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT. 4. COMPENSATION In consideration of the performance of the services described herein, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a fee not to exceed dollars ($�. 5. PRIORITIES In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this AGREEMENT, the CITY's RFP, or the CONSULTANT's Proposal, the following order of precedence shall govern: 1) AGREEMENT, 2) the CONSULTANT's Proposal, and 3) the CITY's RFP. 2 agree/fomVprofsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE 6. EXTRA WORK In the event CITY requires additional services not included in Exhibit "A," or changes in the scope of services described in Exhibit "A," CONSULTANT will undertake such work only after receiving written authorization from CITY. Additional compensation for such extra work shall be allowed only if the prior written approval of CITY is obtained. 7. METHOD OF PAYMENT A. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to progress payments toward the fixed fee set forth herein in accordance with the progress and payment schedules set forth in Exhibit "A." B. Delivery of work product: A copy of every memorandum, letter, report, calculation and other documentation prepared by CONSULTANT shall be submitted to CITY to demonstrate progress toward completion of tasks. In the event CITY rejects or has comments on any such product, CITY shall identify specific requirements for satisfactory completion. Any such product which has not been formally accepted or rejected by CITY shall be deemed accepted. C. CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY an invoice for each progress payment due. Such invoice shall: 1) Reference this AGREEMENT; 2) Describe the services performed; 3) Show the total amount of the payment due; 4) Include a certification by a principal member of CONSULTANT's firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this AGREEMENT; and 3 agree/form/profsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE 5) For all payments include an estimate of the percentage of work completed. Upon submission of any such invoice, if CITY is satisfied that CONSULTANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this AGREEMENT, CITY shall promptly approve the invoice, in which event payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice by CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If CITY does not approve an invoice, CITY shall notify CONSULTANT in writing of the reasons for non-approval within seven(7) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be suspended until the parties agree that past performance by CONSULTANT is in, or has been brought into compliance, or until this AGREEMENT is terminated as provided herein. D. Any billings for extra work or additional services authorized by CITY shall be invoiced separately to CITY. Such invoice shall contain all of the information required above, and in addition shall list the hours expended and hourly rate charged for such time. Such invoices shall be approved by CITY if the work performed is in accordance with the extra work or additional services requested, and if CITY is satisfied that the statement of hours worked and costs incurred is accurate. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any dispute between the parties concerning payment of such an invoice shall be treated as separate and apart from the ongoing performance of the remainder of this AGREEMENT. 8. DISPOSITION OF PLANS. ESTIMATES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS CONSULTANT agrees that all materials prepared hereunder, including all original drawings, designs, reports, both field and office notices, calculations, maps, memoranda, letters and other documents, shall be turned over to CITY upon termination of this 4 agree/form/profsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE AGREEMENT or upon PROJECT completion, whichever shall occur first. In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated, said materials may be used by CITY in the completion of the PROJECT or as it otherwise sees fit. Title to said materials shall pass to CITY upon payment of fees determined to be earned by CONSULTANT to the point of termination or completion of the PROJECT,whichever is applicable. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder. 9. HOLD HARMLESS CONSULTANT shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expenses, costs (including without limitation, costs and fees of litigation of every nature) arising out of or in connection with performance of this AGREEMENT or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. 10. WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1861, CONSULTANT acknowledges awareness of Section 3700 et seq. of said Code, which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation; CONSULTANT covenants that it will comply with such provisions prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder. CONSULTANT shall maintain workers' compensation insurance in an amount of not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000)bodily injury by accident, each occurrence, One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000)bodily injury by disease, each employee, Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000)bodily injury by disease,policy limit. 5 agree/form/profsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE CONSULTANT shall require all subcontractors to provide such workers' compensation insurance for all of the subcontractors' employees. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of waiver of subrogation under the terms of the workers' compensation insurance and CONSULTANT shall similarly require all subcontractors to waive subrogation. 11. GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE In addition to the workers' compensation insurance and CONSULTANT's covenant to indemnify CITY, CONSULTANT shall obtain and furnish to CITY, a policy of general public liability insurance, including motor vehicle coverage covering the PROJECT. Said policy shall indemnify CONSULTANT, its officers, agents and employees, while acting within the scope of their duties, against any and all claims arising out of or in connection with the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not less than the following amount: combined single limit bodily injury and property damage, including products/completed operations liability and blanket contractual liability, of$1,000,000 per occurrence. If coverage is provided under a form which includes a designated general aggregate limit, the aggregate limit must be no less than $1,000,000 for this PROJECT. Said policy shall name CITY, its agents, its officers, employees and volunteers as Additional Insureds, and shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which may be applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage and that CONSULTANT's insurance shall be primary. Under no circumstances shall the above-mentioned insurance contain a self- insured retention, or a"deductible"or any other similar form of limitation on the required coverage. 6 agree/fomVprofsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE 12. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE CONSULTANT shall furnish a professional liability insurance policy covering the work performed by it hereunder. Said policy shall provide coverage for CONSULTANT's professional liability in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and in the aggregate. A claims-made policy shall be acceptable if the policy further provides that: A. The policy retroactive date coincides with or precedes the professional services contractor's start of work(including subsequent policies purchased as renewals or replacements). B. CONSULTANT will make every effort to maintain similar insurance during the required extended period of coverage following project completion, including the requirement of adding all additional insureds. C. If insurance is terminated for any reason, CONSULTANT agrees to purchase an extended reporting provision of at least two (2) years to report claims arising from work performed in connection with this AGREEMENT. D. The reporting of circumstances or incidents that might give rise to future claims. 13. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE Prior to commencing performance of the work hereunder, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY certificates of insurance subject to approval of the City Attorney evidencing the foregoing insurance coverages as required by this AGREEMENT; said certificates shall: A. provide the name and policy number of each carrier and policy; B. shall state that the policy is currently in force; and 7 agree/form/profsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE C. shall promise that such policies shall not be suspended, voided or canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty(30) days prior written notice; however, ten(10) days prior written notice in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. CONSULTANT shall maintain the foregoing insurance coverages in force until the work under this AGREEMENT is fully completed and accepted by CITY. The requirement for carrying the foregoing insurance coverages shall not derogate from the provisions for indemnification of CITY by CONSULTANT under the AGREEMENT. CITY or its representative shall at all times have the right to demand the original or a copy of all said policies of insurance. CONSULTANT shall pay, in a prompt and timely manner, the premiums on all insurance hereinabove required. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONSULTANT is, and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this AGREEMENT as an independent contractor. CONSULTANT shall secure at its expense, and be responsible for any and all payment of all taxes, social security, state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTANT and its officers, agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection with the services to be performed hereunder. 15. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. CITY may terminate CONSULTANT's services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully complete. Any termination of this AGREEMENT 8 agree/forr dprofsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE by CITY shall be made in writing, notice of which shall be delivered to CONSULTANT as provided herein. 16. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING This AGREEMENT is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the consent of CITY. 17. COPYRIGHTS/PATENTS CITY shall own all rights to any patent or copyright on any work, item or material produced as a result of this AGREEMENT. 18. CITY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this AGREEMENT. No officer or employee of CITY shall have any financial interest in this AGREEMENT in violation of the applicable provisions of the California Government Code. 19. NOTICES Any notice or special instructions required to be given in writing under this AGREEMENT shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT's agent (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to CITY's Director of as the situation shall warrant, or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope,postage prepaid, and depositing the same in the United States Postal Service, addressed as follows: TO CITY: TO CONSULTANT: Director of Public Works City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 9 agree/form/profsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE 20. IMMIGRATION CONSULTANT shall be responsible for full compliance with the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States and shall, in particular, comply with the provisions of the United States Code regarding employment verification. 21. LEGAL SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING PROHIBITED CONSULTANT and CITY agree that CITY is not liable for payment of any subcontractor work involving legal services, and that such legal services are expressly outside the scope of services contemplated hereunder. CONSULTANT understands that pursuant to Huntington Beach City Charter Section 309, the City Attorney is the exclusive legal counsel for CITY; and CITY shall not be liable for payment of any legal services expenses incurred by CONSULTANT. 22. ATTORNEY'S FEES In the event suit is brought by either party to enforce the terms and provisions of this AGREEMENT or to secure the performance hereof, each party shall bear its own attorney's fees. REST OF PAGE NOT USED 10 agree/form/profsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE . 23. ENTIRETY The foregoing, and Exhibit "A" attached hereto, set forth the entire AGREEMENT between the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed by and through their authorized offices the day,month and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation of the State of California By: print name ITS: (circle one)Chairman/President/Vice President Mayor AND ATTEST: By: print name City Clerk ITS: (circle one)Secretary/Chief Financial Officer/Asst. Secretary—Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: REVIEWED AND APPROVED: P Attorney City Administrator INITIATED AND APPROVED: Director of Public Works 11 agree/form/profsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND FOR INSTALLATION OF WATER WELL NO. 12 PUMP AND FACILITIES (CC No. 1119) Table of Contents 1 Work Statement .......................................................................................................1 2 City Staff Assistance................................................................................................2 3 Time of Performance...............................................................................................2 4 Compensation ..........................................................................................................2 5 Priorities........................................................................................2 6 Extra Work...............................................................................................................2 7 Method of Payment..................................................................................................3 8 Disposition of Plans, Estimates and Other Documents ...........................................4 9 Hold Harmless .........................................................................................................5 10 Workers'Compensation Insurance ..........................................................................5 11 General Liability Insurance......................................................................................6 12 Professional Liability Insurance..............................................................................6 13 Certificates of Insurance..........................................................................................7 14 Independent Contractor............................................................................................8 15 Termination of Agreement.......................................................................................8 16 Assignment and Subcontracting..............................................................................9 17 Copyrights/Patents...................................................................................................9 18 City Employees and Officials..................................................................................9 19 Notices.....................................................................................................................9 20 Immigration..............................................................................................................10 21 Legal Services Subcontracting Prohibited...............................................................10 22 Attorney's Fees.........................................................................................................10 23 Entirety.....................................................................................................................10 12 agree/form/profsery-12/8/99 SAMPLE �M 3 .03 REQUEST FOR ACTION MEETING DATE: May 1, 2000 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PW 00-31 This new water well was extensively tested because of concerns regarding its water quality. It was concluded that the water meets all water quality standards, that the well design may now be completed.and the water introduced directly into the City's water distribution system. The RFQ/RFP process began on November 29, 1999, by staff soliciting Requests for Qualifications (RFQs) to the following engineering consultants: AKM Consulting Engineers* Harris & Associates ASL HDR Engineering Black &Veatch John Carollo Engineers Boyle Engineering* . Keith Companies, The* Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. Kennedy/Jenks Consultants* Cash & Associates Luhdorff & Scalmanini CGvL Parsons Engineering Science* CH2M Hill RMS Civiltec Engineering* RMS Daniel Boyle Engineering, Inc. Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates* David Evans & Assoc. SA Associates Fugro West, Inc. Sidawi & Associates Geomatrix Tetra Tech, Inc. Hall & Foreman, Inc.* Seven engineering firms (those denoted with an asterisk, above) submitted Statements of Qualifications (SOQs). The top three ranked firms (Boyle Engineering, RBF, Parsons) were invited to respond to a formal Request for Proposal (RFP). After careful consideration, it was determined that both Boyle and RBF were the best qualified, responsive and capable of performing the work. Boyle was afforded the opportunity to clarify their proposal and RBF was asked to consider additional construction support services to balance the proposals. The evaluation concluded that RBF fully understood the scope of work and that their proposal was significantly more cost effective. Staff accepts and recommends the. RBF proposal in the amount of $223,307 as a comprehensive proposal reasonable fee. This process is consistent with the City's policy of Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) for professional services. Public Works Commission Review: Not required at this time. When the design of this project is completed, it will be presented to both the Public Works Commission and City Council for review and approval, prior to bidding for construction. RCA Well No. 12.doc 04/19/00 1:21 PM G�?GiiV,- RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Public Works SUBJECT: �EX�E-GIJTE PROFESSIONAL SERVIGES:CQNTRAC�T FO'R�WATER WE'LL NO:12 PUMP_AND FACILITIES —INSTALLATION (CG 1119r _,) COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ,May l- 2009 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attorney) . Attached Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Attached Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable \� Staff Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable— Find ings/Cond itions for Approval and/or Denial Attached EXPLANATfON FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS' REVIEWED RETURNED FORWARDED Administrative Staff Assistant City Administrator I itial) City Administrator (Initial) City Clerk ( ) EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM: ¢�Cc tea_ k Ly LY ! 1I SpaceOnly) RCA Author: TRulla:jm Ext. 5524