Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHIRTIETH STREET ARCHITECTS, INC - 1985-10-21 ,�. .� ,�,4� 3��,,r�•,.c. Pew REQU f~t,JR 'CITY CC7UNdIPIL uTiON Date October 19, 1987 Submitted to: Honorable hiayor and City Council " t.A Paul E. Cook, Inter{m City Administrator `� _ ,� f'� -:` u�L Submitted liy. f` �v t x >plzGti 1� pouglas La Belle, Depuc; 'ity Administrator .Prepared by: Subject: HISTORICAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT err Consistent with Council Policy? Yes ( ) New Policy or Exception Statement,of issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: SI TEMENT OF ISSUE: Staff requested.City Council approve of the Historic Resources Survey and authorize the transmittal of the Survey a;d accompanying individual documentation to the depository at the State Historic Preservation Office in Sacramento. RECOMME DA iON: 1 Staff hRc mmends that the City CotwcJ receive the Historic RNources Survey zmd direct the His torlo:-Re ources Board to clarifly,,heir ideas regarding imple'txentation of the recommendations-proposed in the Survey. Specifically, staff recomme`rds that the r' Historic Resources 136as-d1ZEepare an analysis regarding how the survey wi a used as planning tool for the City, ani?rwhat the implications f accepting the Su AN.ALMI The Historic Resources Board is requesting the Counct; to approve the Survey and send it and accompanying documents to the depository of the State Office of Historic Preservation. The Board reached this decision after analyzing the Survey and in response to guidance from Council liaison Peter Green vlbo suggested the above request. The Council approved and funded the Survey which was completed a year ago (September 1986). The Board views the Councils official approval of the Survey as the first step in the attainment of goals .and policies regarding historic resources in the City. The Board is currently in the process of reviewing the recommendations included In the Survey and will come back to Council with a prioritized list regarding the implementation of all or some`of those recommendations. Among the recommendations that the Board is considering are the following: Approve the Historic Resources Survey and transmit it and accompanying documentation (Sin-vey,sheets identifying each structure ranked in the Survey) for deposition at the State Office of Historic Preservation. Also, direct. the Historical Resources Board to provide the Council with a prioritized list of concerns regarding historic issues and how the al Council may choose to implement the Boards recommendation. Ylo Nils : 1 CITY :, OF HrJNTINGT614cBEACH CA 87-140 COUNCIL • ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION "UWW. M" u.cn To From Honorable Mayor and Paul E. Cook, Acttn;\ City Council Members City Administrator Subject Date HLSTORICA.L RESOURCES October 22. 1987 SURVEY REPORT ..The Historic Resources Board is requ#:sting the City Council to approve the Historic Resources Survey and authorize transmittal of the Survey and accompanying individual documentat�nt: to the depository at the State Historic Preservation Office in Sacramento. The Survey was requested by Council in the spring of 19Q5 in order to identify the historic resources of the City's downtown area. The Survey was completed in September of 1986 and formally transmitted to Council in February of 1987. The Council then formed the Historic Resources Board which held its first meeting in June of 1987. A priority task for the Board has been a review of the Survey and the subsequent request before you. The Historic Resources Board is making this following discussions with Council liaison Peter Green. The Board views the Councils official approval of the Surv;:y as the first , step in the attainment of goals and policies regarding historic resources in the City. The Board is currently in the process of reviewing the recommendations inc;uded in the Survey and will come back to Council with a prioritized list regarding the implementation of all or some of those recommendations. Among the recommendations that the Board is considering are the following: 1) Re-evaluating the structures ranked "A" and "B" in the survey. The consultant ranked the structures according to their architectural value. but not cultural/social-historic value, such as who was the original occupant of a particular house ;end what role did they play in the establishment of the City and/or County. 2) :augment the survey to include other areas. in the city. 3) Consider an ordinance that would establish policies, goals and programs regarding protecting and enhancing the city's heritage. 4) Consider the establishment of historic districts and their implications regarding land use and zoning. 5) Consider the addition of a Historic Resources Element to the city's General Plan. ��T221987 1. Reevaluating the st `•ures''iihked "A" and;"B" in the Surv1•1... The consultant ranked'the struct° .according to their architectural w riut not cultural/sneial�-hilt tc value, such as who was the origin occupant of a particular house and role"did'they play in the establishment of the City and/or County. 2. Augment the Survey to include other a re as`in'the`CI+,y. 3. Consider an'ordinance'that would establish'policies, goals and programs regarding protecting and Enhancing the City's heritage. 4. Consider the establishment of histo -ic'districts and their implications regarding land use and zoning. 5. Consider the addition of a Historic Resources Element to the City's General Plan. Rather than approving the survey at this time, staff is recommending that the Historic Resources Board analyze the Historic Resources Survuy and its recommendations as a planning tool, identifying for Council how the Survey's recommendations can be used to implement policy and procedure regarding a Huntington Beach Historic Resources Program. with further direction from the Historic Resources Board, the Survey could be augmented with an appendix that identifies City goals regarding historic resources and states how the Survey relates, in importance and perspective, to historic goals and programs. EL114D11YC Not applicable. ALTERNATIYE ,, CIJON: Approve the Historic Resources Survey and transmit it and accompanying documentation (Survey sheets identifying each structure ranked in the Survey) for deposition at the State Office of Historic Preservation. Also, direct the Historical Resources Board to provide the Council with a prioritized list of concerns regarding historic issues and how the Council may choose to i._.plement the Boards recommendation. AMCHMEM: 1. Histnrical Resources Survey memo dated 10/22/87. 2. Letter from Historic Resources Board 3. Historical Resource Survey (Fre:viously :r.3nnn,.tted) DLB:DTB:gbm RCA'-- 10/19/87 ..y_ (9311d) a+ 1. Yr Rather than approanalyzeving ihe,survey a,t'this time; staff is recommerd ng that the Historic . Resources Board the Historic Resources S.:,-'vey and�its recoc-+menda tions as a planning tool, identifying for:.Council hou: the sunreys:recommendations can be.used `to implement policy an procedure regarding a. Huntington Beach,Historic Resources Program. With further direction Trom"the 111storic Resources Board,-`the survey could be augmented`M rh an appendix that identifies city goals regarding historic resources and 'states how the survey relates, in importance and perspective, to historic goals and progra ms. Respectfully submitted, • Paul E. Cook, Acting City Administrator PEC/DLB:lp Attachments: Letter from Historic Resources Board Historical Resource Survey 291la �z HistrYric: �es`o;arce`s Board CITY C,F HUNTINGTON BEACH ,a„T,,,Gro,, ,euH Post Otrice Box 190 Hi--itington `Beach, California 92648 October S, 1987 SUBJECT: HISTORICAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT, DATED SEPTE�t13ER, 1986 Members of Council: In the spring of 1985. the Council unanimously approved and funded a historical resources sur-vey in one section of the original city of Huntington Beach. This study was conducted by community volunteers under the guidance of 30th Street :architects, a private consultant. It was completed in September, 1986, and submitted to Council for adoption on February 20, 1987. At that time, Council directed that a citizens board be formed to review the surrey and matte rerommendations on it and other matters related to historic preservation. Ti:e Historic Resources Beard was formed in June. 1987. It reviewed the document throughout the summer and met with Councilman Green on September 30. 195 ', regarding i:s dis-position. The Board, with the concurrence of Dr. Green. unanimously a;eed to approve the document and request that Council :ake the following ac:ion: 1. That it approve the survey: and. ?. That it authorize transmittal of :he survey results and the accompanying individual documentation on each structure to the depository at the State Historic Preservation Office in Sacramento. This action will complete the first step toward recognizing the: significance of historic structures in the City and :maintaining an integrity and quality of life for Huntington Beach residents and visitors. Sincerely, ! . Barbara Stilkovich, Chairman Historic Resources Board %IB:DTB:gbm (9228d) HISTORICAL'RESOD ROES BGaR�A Special Meeting ?y Session September 30, 1987 Members present: Bill Dow, Guy Guzzardo, Cheryl Hagood, Barbara Milkovich (chairman), Jerry Person, Maureen Rivers, Judy Walker (p:rivcd late), Nancy Whitney--Desautels. Members absent: Janet Downs, Jeff Lamb, Sheldon (Teny)Thorne. Councilmen present: Dr. Peter Greets Public: Arline Howard Excerpt from minutes: Motion by Whitney Desautels, seconded by Person: The Historic Resources Board requests that the City Councii formally accept the Historic Resources Survey Report, dated September, 1986. Vote: In savor: Dow. Guzzardo, Hagood. Person. Rivers, Whiney-De�sauteis. Opposed: none ;Motion b;: Guzzardo, seconded bny Whitne,:-Desautels: The Historic Resources Boa:-d requests that the City Council ti ansmit the Historic Resources Survey Report and all accompany survey inventory sheets to the State Historic Preservation oft:ce in S;,crarnento as final disposition. Vote: in favor: Dow,Guzzardo, Hagocd, Person, Rivers, Whitney-Desautels. Opposed: none Maureen Rivers Secretary (9228d) r �_' �. .p:,.t, � �[, � r �, ''Y a Yirf r' ., � �•� y .. �rnrs r: °`7 t�r La:y�+>, '�• �.�.�'kie,.X`1t�1� '���.. � 't � .: ry+.,y.+i.a� ,tL Y.'�'y,, �y,., a r�..a.vr �. r» areas c v . , � � le woj a/�Iwffl"A ON e9e9)6&0Wq, 1986 CITY OF, 1-1'UFiTI l+irT�l�l BEACH 4 COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION rn�n•.c;tcn q ac n /� 7 E' To Honorable Mayor and From Charles W. Thompson, .� City Council Membcrs City Administrator Subject HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY pate May 1.., 1986 5 ' I have attac.hee, a copy of the preliminary finding on the: historic survey of downtown buildings. This study was conducted by Thirtieth Street Architects at the direction of Counci 1. Staff reconirre:nds that you review the report and direct .staf f to incorporate the study's finding to the!' greatest extent feasible and include a section of the downtown master plan as a designated historic area. Staff further recommends that this area be inland of Walnut Street, thus not adversely affecting either the Main-Pier Phase 1 or Phase 11 redevelopment projects. RespS51WII.qr submitted. __70 c_.hacles %'. Thompson, City :administrator Cu'T/s,\%A:lp Attachment 2434h . d Cr"...r OF BtUM N P1 +CH INZON A. Purpose of the Study In 06tober 1985, the City of 11intinatcn Beach authorized the preparation of ar. historic/resources surrey. The survey area includes all areas within the City ' s Downtown and adjacent areas closely related to the history or development of the City. The survey covers structures, sites and artifacts related to the area's history from the origins of the community to and including 1946. Of the structures built during this period , the City estimates that 500 structures remain and these will be documented by the field survey and research. The City's purpose in requesting the work, is to provide documentation of historic and cultural resources so that City policies and regulations can be established to protect and preserve these resources winile allowing for new oevelopamt, where aEpropriate. In order to provide data on the Dc%wntown coc;mrical core in a timely :ashion, this area was given priority over residential areas. This report summarizes the findings of the survey for the commercial core and provides recomendations for actions by the City. r. y: .r. IT B. Summary of the Study Process The. survey involves the coordinated effort of a consultant team consisting of Diann Marsh (preservation consultant, responsible for survey work ) and Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. (responsible for coordination of the survey and review of survey work on commercial structures) . The three documents "described above are products of a six-month study effort, generally divided into four phases, as follows: P.baSe 1.: ResSW '.o Jd2n .fiiQgticn Wt� 2rggr, M J2rgV1ration The purpose of this phase is to acquaint the consultant team mcnbers with the City's historic resources and the specific interests and requirements of the City staff, the Historical Society and the Historic Survey Ca=. ittee. An important task of this phase is a thorough windshield survey of the entire study area to provide an overview of potential resources. Phaso. 2: 1_%g2� `city. Racrlj=ir.=t and Tra,aiDa of_ '' unteeu The purpose of this phase is to gather and organize the survey resources -- including volunteers as well as training materials and survey materials. A major task of this phase is the "Survey Blitz" training day for volunteers. Rhas? ; 5, jrvgv PP.*eUcb md EyaluatiQn This phase is the core of the study process and has as its objective the compilation of information as needed to complete- the Historic Resources Inventory Form to be acceptable to the State Office of Historic Preservation. Tasks involved in this phase include field work, library and records research and mapping} of inventoried structures. PbMe 4:, FreparatiM Q Inygntory D2z=nts The purpose of this prase is to refine and coordinate documents prepared during the study process to a cohesive final product and to prepare related documents or materials for public information. The tasks of this phase include preparing reomme-ndat ionsand conclusions drawn from the survey work for inclusion in the Survey Report. Due to the need to coordinate these findings with the City's redevelopment activities, recommendations for the- commercizl core are presented in this report. Recommendations for the residential areas will be prepared later and will be included in the final report. Preparation of a public relations booklet for public distribution is also part of this phase. s� C. Ghal.s ct the Study With the review of the Historic Survey Committee, a series of goals for the Historic/Cultural Resources Survey have been defined and are listed below: - To identify the historic and cultural resources in the City of Huntington Beach to provide a basis of information for future planning; - To identify structures within the commercial core of the City which should be preserved or protected in conjunction with the City's efforts a4 redeveloprient; - To develop recom-wndations for City policy and regulations &signed to preserve sufficient historic resources to evoke the distinctive character and the inportant stages in the history of 11intington Beach; and - To promote community awareness of local history and historic architectural styles. I I. SURVEY t;Y A. Overview of Survey' Arproach The methodology 'developed . for the survey of historic/cultural resources has these objectives: 1) to maximize the research effort on those structures or sites found to be of historic importance; 2) to provide a co ),.ehensive data base on all resources; and 3) to provide a basis for evaluating the hisvoric structures and rmxxTmnding programs for preservation. In order to aoco;nplish the objectives, the survey effort was carefully organized prior to the initiation of any survey work. The four primary aspects of the survey methodology are briefly summarized below: - A complete windshield survey of resources was casxb&,.ed to identify potential resources and to categorize these in terms of possible significance; Based on the initial windshield survey, basic architectural styles found in Hnt:.ngtcn Beach were identified and categorized; - Survey procedures were established identifying r.ethods of recordi.rrg i.nfonration and methods to tier research efforts; and - Mapping approaches were identified to serve as a tool in evaluating the survey findings. G.r 8 B. Inventory Prating System An initial effort of the consultant team was to conduct a thorough "windshield surrey", of the City, which involves driving the City methodically and recording locations and architectural styles of buildings. The purposes of this survey were to identify the ner and location of potential resources and to categorizeumb these resources in terms of possible significance. The secondary purposes of the survey were to acquaint the consultant staff with the City as a whom and to familiarize them with the range and types of architectural styles found in the City. In conducting the windshield survey for the Doti.mtown, the field research staff walked the entire study area on a street--by-street basis. Specific notes were made on the locations and architectural styles of buildings which were observed that are likely to have been built prior to 1946. Eased on this initial review of architectural style, building condition and age, each structure (or 'group of related structures) was assigned to one of four categories (0 through 3) , as described below: Ring - This category includes buildings which are obviaus examples of historically simificant or notable struures indicated by distinctive architectural characteristics or age. occasionally, the structure 's relationship to patterns of local history is evident and would be included. These buildings are potential candidates for individual lilting on the National Register of Historic Places. Rating - This category includes buildings which are som-what less unusual or -distinctive in terms of age or architecture. In general , howv,rer, these arc well designed buildings which research may F:ove to have a relationship to important events or persons in history. Many of these buildings may have local or statewide significance . These buildings contribute to the historical a.bianre of a possible district, but are not likely to be National Register candidates on their own rerit. Rating - This category includ_s pre-1946 buildings which have been altered over the years so that their original design is obscured. These buildings could contribute to the character' of an historic district if the Wilding r.ere rehabilitated. Plating - This category includes pre-1946 buildings which have been substantially altered from the original style such that rehabilitatioij is difficult o: Impossible. Also included in this rating are structures never than the 1946 cut-off date. - Designation - An "R" is added to other ratings to indicate a residential structure . Since the downtown is a commerical area, residential structures would not contribute to a historic district, even where these may be architecturally significant. These ratings were reviewed after research had been conducted on each structure's historic significance. where research indicated the structure was related to important persons or events in local history, the rating was adjusted, as appropriate. Thus, the ratings-shown on the attached. chart reflect both the architectural character and the historic significance of buildings within the Downtown study area. DOWNTOWN HISTORIC iNYEVTORY- PREPARED 3/5/96 HISTORICAL RATING 0 -.NO HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 1 1- POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR If REMODEL.REYERSED 2 - POSSIBLE CONTRiBUTOR 13 - POSSIBLE NATIONAL REGISTER LISTING R •'RESIDENTIAL 1 `1 - REQUIRES SEISMIC UPGRADE STREET R0. STREET STYLE FST.CO>NSTItU'CT.+_H1ST.RATiNGiS"UCT.RATING 115 13RD STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL i 1920 1 2 i ?21 '3RD STREIrT COLONIAL R 2 REVIVAL ' 1905 ! ..1 - - 03 �,iRD STREET ;SPANISH REVIVAL ( 1925 4 3 121 'STH STREET ;20'S COMMERCIAL 1922 1 ' 122 +STii STREET 1301 COMMERCIAL _ ' 1935 204 15,ni STREET !CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW. 1905 3-R _ 206 sni S R 7 EE2'A ANNE COTTAGE ! 1900 2•R 210 _ STH STREET `20'S COMMERCIAL 2145TN STREET 120-5 COMMERCIAL 1925 ? I 225 5TH STREET tSTREAMLINE MODERNE _ 1930 I 101 •STH STREET I:0"S BRICK COMMERCIAL. :920 I 311 '5111 STREET !ZIG-ZAG MODERNE 1930 1 313 °:5TH STREET ICRAFTSMAN HOUSE 1915 0-R 5TH STREET aCRAFTSMAN HOUSE �� 1910 2-R 321 ,5T4 STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL 1905 2•R 32s ISTH STREET ISPANISH COLONIAL 1925 _;� F-R 2I8-220 'STIR STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1940 �3 i 115 MAIN STRUT 20*5 COMMERCIAL 1916 I 117 :MAIN STREET 20'S f.OMMERCiAL _ 1920 I i (1.0 Mal!. STREET iBRIC1; COMMERCIAL 1915 0 — 122 MAIN STREET !EARLY COMMERCIAL 1905 123 MAIN STREET 'EARLY COMMERCIAL 1921 124_ 'MAIN STREET ,ManERNE ��-. -'-- 1910 2 1.12� .� . _ . MAIN STREET ZIGZAG MODERN!: ._ ._...._.1.935 12, 'MAIN STREET -MODERNE 1930 i 202 ;MAIN STREET "NCW 1970 0 205 'MAIN STREET !ZIGZAG MODERNE - 1430 207_ _ r^ I MA Its STREET~ !EARLY THEATRE _ � �1910 206 MAIN STREET 20 S COMMERCIAL 1915 ;� 0 I 209 _ :MAIL: MEETF -20'S COMMERCiAL 1930� 2� i MAIN MEET '305 COMMERCIAL �1930 212 _ MAIN STREET__ 20'S COMMERCIAL_ . - _ _1915 F;214 13 ;_MAIN STREET 20'5 COMMERCIAL 1930 2 MAIN STREET ;20 5 COMMERCIAL 1920 I I MAiN STREET _ !20'S COMMERCIAL_ 1920 217 MAIN STREET ;w'E�TERh FALST.FRO`T�� 1910 216 -MAIN STREET '20 S COMMERCIAL - 1920 0 ! ►RAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIALu�-~ 1920 221 —���—MAIN MEET• +i20 S COMMERCIAL 223 =MAIN STREET 120'S COMMERCIAL 1920 224 iMAIN STREET — 20'S COMMERCIAL 1925 226 � __AMAIN STREET _ 0~5 BRICK COMMERCIAL! 1520 1 2 I 1 223 AMAIN STREET 120"S BRICK COMMERCIAL' 1920 3 1 301 `MAIN MEET '201 GAS STATION 1920 1 PAGE DO'NNTO* AlISTORIC'INVENTORT•• PREPARED 3/5/96 HISTORICAL RATING 0 - NO HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 1 1- POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR IF REMODEL REVERSED R 2 - POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR ���r �'3 - POSSIBLE NATIONAL REGISTER LISTING R - RESIDENTIAL i I - REQUIRES -SEISMIC UPGRADE 305 ;MAIN STREET 30'5 COMMERCIAL_ 1 1930 2 # i 307 MAIN STREET lEARLY COMMERCIAL __ w1906 0 # 1 309 _ IMA1N STREET_ !30'S COMMERCIAL_ _1 1930 ► 0 I 1 410 _TMA1N STREET _120'S COMMERCIAL 1920 I 0 1 1 424 ;MAIN STREET '20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 i 1 11 423 IMAIN STREET 30-S COMMERCIAL t 1930 # 101. 109 1/2 MAIN STREET !20'S COMMERCIAL 1915 111-113_ ;MAIN STREET {20'S COMMERCIAL 1925 ! i ' I 116- 11b I/2 _ 'MAIN STREET :BRICK COMMERCIAL ~I 1915 I # I 119- 1,1611 tMt._A1N STREET _ '20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 20 1-2 03 ,MAIN STREET i20'�COMMERCIAL 1920 0 I 210-210 1t2 ;M»IN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1915 i 1 1 222-222 I1 NAIh' STREET 120'S COMMERCI»L 1920 31f*-322 !MAIN STREET t30'S COMMERCIAL 1"35 i 0 I ,116 STREET #MODERNE 1935 r 3 1 ;04 'PACIFIC COAST 'SPANISH COLONIAL REV.' 1930 3 306 PACIFIC COAST ISPANISH COLONIAL RED'; 19:9 3 1 319 'PACIFIC COAST NODERNE 1930 2 406 PACIFIC COAj, '201 COMMERCIAL 1 92 0 40S .PACIFIC COAST �20'S COMMERCIAL 1930 1 1 410 _ PACIFIC COAST G20'S COMMERCIAL 1920__ 1.1--t16 _ PACIFIC COAST 20 S COMMERCIAL 1910 I I CORNERSTONE ,PACIFIC COAST $NONE 1914 2 PIER SHOPS 'PACIFIC COAST 'ZIGZAG MODEF.NE 1930 2 BAIT SHOP PIER _ ZIGZAG MODERNE 1930 2 311_�._._.. 'WALNUT .......___.`O�S COMMERCIAL �-.- M i4�o � .._.. ._ ._�_. . ._ . 411 'WALNUT 'MODERNE 1930 2 {412-414 &LNUT 20*S COMMERCIAL 1425 2 1 ti t PAGE 2 III. FINDINHS CF THE SLEM The . inventory evaluated 72 buildings within an area generally including the pier and Pacific Coast Highway to the south, both sides of 5th Street to-the east and bounded by orange Avenue and 3rd Street on the north and west. These buildings wre rated as follows: ,Ratio r1bta,l 0 9 12.5 1 27 37.5 2 22 30.5 3 7 9.7 R 7 _2.7 72 99.9 The figures indicate that less than 10% of the buildings in the Downtown area are National Register quality ("3" Rating) . it&se buildings in:lude the following: 1 . 303 Olive Street 2. 218-220 5th Street (Old City Hall) 3. 126 Main Street 4. 228 Main Street 5. 316 Olive Street (Post office) 6.. 304 Pacific Coast Highway 7. 306 Pacific Coast Higlivoy (Golden Bear) The figures also indicate that the Downtown area has had a relatively small amount of intrusions by new buildings or buildings lost b}• remodelings ("0" Rating - 12. 5%) ► If the 10 parking areas are a1sc counted as intrusions to the Downtown, approximately 20% of the old Downtown has been lost try demolition, new construction or remodeling. These findings are further detailed on the attached chart and map. This chart also includes the architectural style, estimated construction date and a structural rating. The latter is based on the City's evaluation of unreinfotced masonry buildings requiring seismic upgrades. IV. RE COMMENMTIONS A. Introduction The ; City of Huntington. Beach has a good resource in its historic buildings within the Downtown commercial core. Since many of these buildings have been modified over the years and so.� have been lost, the value of. this historic resource may not be immediately apparent to the casual observer . However , a program to preserve these historic structures can have many benefits to the ccmwnity, including: Identification and preservation of historic buildings provides local residents with a sense of continuity with the past and their place in history; - Tax incentive programs can be used to encourage rehabilitation of historic structures, particularly revitalization of the Downtown comaercial areas; and - Historic buildings interest pile arr3 can attract visitors to the City as a wool e. B. Landwrks The City's preservation program should, at the very least, pie serve those buildings which are cktermined to be eligible for the National Register. These buildings should be preserved on their original sites since that is an important criteria for National Register eligibility. The survey identified seven buildings in the Downtown core which &e potentially eligible due to their architectural character and/'or their association with historical events, as listed in Section III above. Of the seven structures , the Golden Bear , for example , is both architecturally and historically significant. The structure is a rare exmple of Spanish and folk art architecture, particularly with regard to its cast terra cotta embellishments. Historically, the structure served as an important dinner meeting site with customers including Errol. Flynn and Lionel Barrymore. more recently, the Golden Bear has become- fa:rcus as a showcase for young talent. On the other hand, the importance of 216-220 5th Street is 'not immediately apparent since it is very modest in design. However , research has shcrvm it to be the original City Hall and jail, which has obvious importance in the history of the City. 'Protection to these potential Kitional Register buildings can be provided through a variety of mechanism.,.-, at the City's discretion. The best protection would be the adoption of a local ordinance establishing historic landmarks in the City. Wder the ordinance, modifications to local landmarks would require special review by a Historical Commission or Board, appointed by the City Council. The ordinance also can delay demolition, if such is proposed, while alternative solutions are sought. In `order to provide econa�ic assistance to upgrade and maintain these landmark structures, the City may wish to provide grants or low interest loans from rede•.•clopment funds. Additionally, owners of landmark structures can grant facade easements to non-profit agencies and receive tax benefits where existing zoning permits a more intensive use than the historic structures. Further information on implementation programs will be provi6ed in the Survey Report at the conclusion of the Study. C. Historic District Because the historic commercial core is largely intact, the ert:ire area may be eligible to be preserti�-d as a historic district. The boundaries we recom,-Dend for this historic district are shown cn the attached map. ___—The boundaries .include 49 structures and 6 parking areas, The ratings for the structures within the potential historic district is as follows: p.r__ 4_inQ DZOLMj of Ibtal 0 5 lot 1 20 41% 2 18 37% 3 6 12% Therefore , 49% of the potential district includes possible National Register buildings o:- contributing buildings which are rated as "2" or Mar Since the State's criteria for historic districts is that 65% of the district must retain the historic character, this district would not be eligible for National Register consideration as it stands. IkNcver , many of the "1» rated buildings require only minimal. rehabilitation in order to contribute to the district. Minor rehabs such as painting or ream iog inappropriate signs can be acccuplished quickly and at a low cost. The State's 65% criteria would be met if only 8 of the 20 buildings with a "1» rating wire rehabbed. Rehabbing 12 of the 20 "1" buildings rated "?» may be necessary. to meet the 65% criteria if both buildings and parking lots are considered. Preservation of an historic district within the City's eonrr-:rcial core can 'provide a strong focal point for the co=unity. Preservation of a district, rather than individual structures, also allows owners, who would not otherwise be eligible, to take advantage of federal tax credits. These tar, benefits provide a credit of 20% of the rehab costs on ,certified rehab work for contributing buildings within an historic district. . These owners could also take advantage ,of facade easement programor other local assistance program. Since the proposed historic 'district is within the. City ' s Redevelopment area, :programs . of lent interest loans or grants may be feasible to encourage owners to upgrade their buildings. To inplenent the historic district, . the City caald designate the district and establish a historical Commission or resign Review Board by adoption of an 'ordinance, as `described above. If a district is adapted, it is strongly recomrended that design standar"s or craidelines be established. These guidelines would set the standards for review of proposed alterations or infill by the Commission or Board. Since upgrades aLe needed on many structures and since there is potential for infill on the parking lot sites, these changes must be acccmplished carefully and in a i historically sensitive manner for the district to beCY71'e eligible for national recognition. y ..r V. CONC'i.CSIONS This brief report presents the findings of the historic survey cork on 72 structures within the Downtowm commercial core. The commerical core includes seven structures which are potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Preservation. These sever► structures are Worthy of the City's highest priority in preservation. In addition, the commercial core contains a 'caoncentration of 49 structures within a 2-1/2 block area that may possibly be eligible for the %tional Register as a district. Since rehabilitation of 8 to 12 structures will be needed before the area can be considered as a district, the City should carefully consider the merits of a historic district before further intrusions into the area are permitted. CITY OF HIJNT1NGTIL7N BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK April 24 , 1986 Thirtieth Street architects , Inc. 2821 Newport Beach Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92662 Attn: Jim Wilson The City Council of the City of iiuntinaton Beach at their regular meeting held October 21 , 1985 approved an agreement between your firm and the City to supervise and administer and conduct a historic, surrey. Enclosed is an executed copy of said agreerr.ent and the insurance which you provided. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:b t Enclosures CC: M.ike Adams , Redevelopnent Wa3 yip Lee, Finance : . :. (Tehphms: 714430-SMI REOUE FOR CITY COUNC12 IRA fill 85-56 Date October 1. 1985 Submitted to: honorable ;Mayor and City Council Members Submitted by: Charles 1`'. 'flsornpson, City administrator Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Rede,-^lopme�i ' � � 19 Subject: RECOMMENDATION OF AN HISTORIC I1MOURCES SURV - r r CONSULTANT � .•� ` ,t, i; Consistent with Council Policy? pQ Yes ( New Policy or Exception 3•' 1 Statement of Issue, Recommendaiion, Analysis, Fundinq Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: ;? STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for the City Council's consideration is it recommendation from the Historical Resources Survey committee for the selection of it consultant to conduct the survey. RECOMMENDATION: Stuff and the aplxAnted representatives frorn the Huntington Beach Heritage. Committee of the historical Societ v recommends that the firm of Ibirtieth Street Architects be retained to conduct the Historic Resources Survey. ANALYSIS: At its regular meeting of Jul}' 15, 1985, the C'Ity Council nuthori:e•d the. funding; to conduct a historic resources survey for the city (in an ainount not to exceed '115,000, as appropriate), with special eiiiphas►s on the downto,,wn area. `ills:: action came at the request of the Huntington Beach historical Social} rind _Antiquities C'oinniission. Following the Council's action, the City .administrator created it special staff committee tc word: with representatives of the llut,tington Beach historical Society to solicit and select a consultirn; firm to conduct the s!irvvy. On :August 26, 1985, it Request for Qualifications was distributed to twelve firms and or individuals experienced in this field. By the September ` 0th deadline. five proposals ,were received and the selection committee inet with representatives from the various firms, checked on references, and on September 30th interviewed three of the firms. The following list represents the selection committees' ranking of the submitted proposals: 1. Thirtieth Street architects, inc. 2. heritage Orange County, lac. 3. Sanchez Talarico associates 4. The Planning Consortium 5.. Johnson lieumann Research associates PIO�/84 y . R H 85-56 October 1, 1985 Page Two The recommendation of the Thirtieth Street Architects was a very dif ficult decision and one based an much debate. If for any reason Thirtieth Street Architects are not able to conduct this survey, the committee recommends the: contract be given to Heritage Orange County, Inc. The consensus of the: selection committee was that an) of the five firms could provide the city with the quality and scope: of survey requested. FUwDING SOURCE: Community Development Block Grant Funds. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Select onr of the other firms listed or reject all proposals and solicit neH proposals. This alternative, however, would delay the impli!mentation of the study and could possibly delay actions on downtown redevelopment. ATTACHMENTS: 1. City council meeting minutes of July 15, 19-S5. 2. Request for Chtalitications. 3. Summary of the! five proposals. 4. Selection analysis. 5. Selection committee. 6. .'+greement between the City and Thirtieth `itret-t Atc_htte cts, ln�... CW T/DLB/MA:1p 1434h �., (.. ATTACHMF 14T. No. 1 Page 9 Council Mine - 7/15/85 ANENDME.N7. TO ' THE )M*RANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE ONTINGTON BEACH HAN- AGEKENT EKFIAMMS a ORCUILATIOU." f; PARCLFL 1lA1' 84-r589 - ' DANIEL R1!WADA -- Approved final parcel map and accepted offer of dedication pursuant to the mandatory findings set forth by the Board of Zoning Adjustments on property lorate.•d on the east side of Delaware Street, north of Garfield Avenue, and authorized the City Clerk to execute same and to . release to the County for processing. PARCEL MAP 84-1.205 - STELLRECHT COMPANY - Approved map pursuant to mandatory findings set forth by the Planning Commission on property located on the south aide of Glencoe Avenue, went of Beach Boulevard, and instructed the City Clerk e to execute same and to release to the County for processing. MUNICIPAL PIER -RESTROOM REPLACEMENT PROJECT - DEFERRED - CC-569 - CONSULTANT AGREEKENT - RAMELO RIEiLSSON INC The Deputy City Cleric presented a communication i room the Director of Public Works regarding the municipal pier restrour, replacement project . On motion by Handic, second Kelly, Council unanimously deferred consideration of the municipal pier restroom replacement project . PROPOSED REGIONAL HAZARDOUS WASTE. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT MEETING - 7/18/85 - COUNCILVOW FINLEY TO ATTEND The Deputy City Clerk presented a communication from the City Administrator transmitting the letest draft of a proposed Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for Hazardous Waste Management. The City Administrator presented a staff report . On motion by MacAllister, second Handic , Cour;:il authorized City participation In subgroup of cities and designated Councilwornnn Finley to attend the July 18. 1985 meeting at the Saddleback Inn, Santa Ana. The motion carried by the following roll call vote : jtYES : Kelly, MacAllinter. Handic , Bailey, Finley, Green ?DOES: None APSENT: Thomas RESOURCES SilRM OF DOWNTLVN AILU -`APPROVED TSe City. Administrator presented a cocuaunication f rorn the Deputy City Adminis- traror/Redevelopment regarding the proposed preparation of a historic resources sut-vey. Following discussion, a motion was made by Kelly, seconded by Handic, to authorize staff . to prepare a request for proposals and to co=it staff time � and funding from redevelopment funds as appropriate, not to exceed t15,000, to conduct a historic resources survey for the City of Huntington Beach, with r page 10 Council Minutes - 7/15/85 Special emphasis on the downtown area, ae a cooperstive effort with :the oasis tance of the "Huntington Beach .Heritage Cocmmittee" of the Hlstoricel Society. The motion carried by the following roll call vote : AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Mandic, Bailey, Finley, Green NOES : None ABSENT: Thomas ORD..NO 2780., INTRODUCED AS AMENDED - CODE AMENDMENT 85-2 - OLDTOWN/TOWNLOT/ DO�JNTOfiN SPECIFIC PLAN DISTRICT 2 The Deputy City Clerk presented a canmun;ration from the Director of Develop- ment Services transmitting an amendment to the district regulations :or the Oldtown, To'wnlot and Downtown Specific Plan District No. 2 areas of the City to include changes in the parking requirements, floor area limitations , open space, upper story setbacks and single-unit design standards. The public hearing was held 6/17/85 Council denied Code Amendment No. 85-2 on 6/24185. A motion to reconsider denial was approved 7/1/85 with Council direction that Code Amendment and Ord. No. 2780, is amended, be considered on 7/15/85. The Deputy, City Clerk ,,presented 'Ordinance No. .2780, as amended - "AN ORDI- NANCE 07 THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINCTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY REPEALING SECTIONS 9152 THROUGH 915.8 OF ARTICLE 915 AND 9352 THROUGH 935.8 OF ARTICLE., 935; AMENDING SECTIONS 9150, 9350, 976U.2, 9700.4, 9700.15, 9700.11 A}TD 9700.21 ; AND ADDING NEW ARTICLE 913 AND SECTIONS 97,00. 11 AND 9791.12.7 RELATING TO OLDTOWN AND TOWP.'LOT DISTRICTS AND RESIDENTIAL OFF-STREET PARKING." A motion was made by Mandic, seconded by Green, to approve introduction of Ordinance No. 2780, as amended , with language recommended by Development Services Director per memorandum dated July 11 , 1985, and wi!h the deletion of reference to deed restriction. After reading by title , the motion carried by the following roll . call vote : AiES: MacAllister, Mandic , Bailey, Finley, Green NOES : Kelly ABSENT: Thomas Councilwonan Finley- left the roan. ORDINANCE NO 2784 - INTRODUCTION APPROVED - LICENSE FEE - AUCTIONEERS - AUC- TION COMPANIES The Deputy City Clerk presented Ordinance No. 2784 for Council consideration "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING . SECTION 5.16.080 RELATING TO THE LICENSE FEE FOR LOCAL AUCTIONEERS AND AUCTION COMPANIES. " On motion by Mandic, second Green, Council approved introduction of Ordinance No. 2784, after reading by title, by the following roll call vote : AYES: Kelly, MacAllister, Mandic, Bailey, Green NOES: None ABSENT: Th amas, Finley (out of the room) �-T+ ATTACHMEUT NO. 2 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/PROPOSALS HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY The city of Huntington ©each is soliciting Statement of Qualifications and Proposals from consulting firms interested'in the preparation of a Historic Resources Survey for the city, wi;h spc��ial emphasis on the`downtov,n redevelopment area. The city seeks a qualified consultant who has the ability to analyze the local, regional, and state-wide significance of existing structures and to determine the economic viability of preserving, enhancing, and/or `relocating building within the community. The selected consultant must work cooperatively with the city staff and the local historical society in the development of this study. 1 PHASE I: RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION AND PROGRAM PREPARATION The initial step of the survey will be the selection of the areas and sites within the city to be surveyed. The Downtown residential neighborhoods, the city's commercial core, and a number of at-IRrge sites have been identified by the city staff as appropriate candidates for survey documentation. During this planning period, the consultant will develop definitions of historical and cultural resources to be surveyed and establish evaluation criteria based on State Office of Historical Preservation guidelines. In this proposal, "sites" are defined as buildings, objects, districts, and community design features with historical, architectural, or environmental significance. The consultants' recommendations will be submitted to the city's Historical Committee for approval. The consultants will identify potential architectural and historical resources to the study areas. A resulting list describing the basic characteristics of each site, will be submitted / to the committee for review. Upon completion of the volunteer workshops, volunteers will be given inventory assignments from this preliminary survey list. Slides t!iken during the preliminary survey will be used for presentations to the committee. The consultants, in conjunction with city staff and other experts such as the Ileritage Committee of the Huntington Beach historical Society, will locate sources of primary and secondary historical information pertaining to the built environment of the city. PHASE Q: PUBLICITY, RECRUITMENT, AND TRAINING OF VOLUNT: ERS A publicity campaign will solicit knowledge from long-time residents of the city and interested members of the public. The publicity will help recruit volunteers for participation in the project, and increase public awareness of the survey, its objectives and anticipated results. in addition, the consultants wail prepare a presentation for the City Council on the objectives of the survey. Volunteer participation can lead to a broader awareness of the city's cultural resources. Experience has demonstrated, however, that a full-scale, cost effective volunteer program requires a. greater budget and time Allowance than is available for the current project. Therefore, volunteer participation in the current project .will be directed specifically towards assistance in the descriptive, research, mapping, photographic, and clerical phases of the Inventory. Emphasis will be put -on involving local residents and members of. the academic and preservation communities who have prior knowledge of historic preservation, architectural history, local history, and documentary photography. One or more workshops and appropriate field sessions will he given by the consultants. The workshops will review architectural development in Southern California and discuss the format for writing architectural descriptions. The workshol will also address research techniques. Field sessions will include consultant led tours, as well its provide on-site instruction in techniques for description writers and photographers. in addition, it is anticipated that the consultants will continue their teaching function on a one-to-one basis throughout the course of the volunteer participation phase of the survey. Volunteers will be supplied with a survey manual consisting of the research guide, tin architectural style guide, copies of requisite survey forins, and an outline of survey rules and etiquette. PHASE III: SURVEY, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION Under the supervision of the consultants, volunteers will write architectural descriptions, conduct research, take photographs, and prepare significant statements. It is recognized that, depending on the number of preliminary sites identified and the number and abilities of the volunteers, that the volunteers may be unable to inventory every site. In such cases, the consultants will prepare the appropriate documentation. The Committee will meet periodically throughout survey period. For most resources, significance is it question of architectural quality and integrity, historical or cultural role or association, environmental importance or prominence, or social value, as well as economic considerations. Using these criteria, the consulteint and the committee members will categorize the survey sites as to level of significance. PHASE IV: PREPARATION OF INVENTORY DOCUMENTS The consultants will prepares a final report suitable for submittal to the State Office of Historic Preservation. It will include a background of the protect, it summary of the methodology used, suggestions for implementation of the survey, and copies of all forms and documents developed for the survey, including the r:: .earch manual. The final inventory listing and mapping will also be part of the report. Fifteen copies of the find! report will be required. 2. 4 One of the most effective methods to gain'broad public appreciation for a city and its architectural and historical resources has been demonstrated .to be widely 'available brochures or booklets. The consultants will prepare a text for such a brochure or booklet, highlighting the survey findings In the context of the architectural development of Huntington ©each. A rough layout and suggestions for Illustrations will be provided. Final editing, camera-ready It yout; and publication shall be the responsibility of the city. PROPOSAL CONTENTREgUIREtiIENTS: The prospective consultant is required to submit a written proposal (three copies) which addresses each of the following topics. The city reserves the right to request additional information if the committee determines such information is necessary. Each consultant who responits to the R FQ is required to provide the following. In order to facilitate review by the city, please submit materials in keeping with this format identifying each item by number and letter. A. _ 2proach to Task 1. General dese.iption about how the Proposer will undertake the required services. 2. A detailed statement of approach to the tasks including anticipated use of staff, inforinntion gathering and methods of analysis to be used, project management and liaison with the city, public presentation techniques and project's schedule. B. Description of Proposer's 2ualifications I. Firm name, address and telephone number. 2. Firm size, composition by skills, ethnicity of employees and any other relevant factors. 3. Services offered and areas of special expertise. 4. Name(s) of principal(s) and professional qualifications. 5. Professional history of firm. 6. Particular qualifications for this project. 7. Statement of current workload and estimated workload over nourse of this project, including availability and capacity to handle the workload requirements of this project. S. Thorough description of who will manage and staff each component of the project. 9. Name and experience of Project Manager/Director for this project who will act as principal contact between Proposer and the city. 3. C. xRerience Proposer is to provide sufficient information about firm's experience In the following areas: 1. Experience with projects of similar scope and ehnracter involving historic surveys and inventories. 2. Experience with projects of equivalent or similar complexity, including those'involving a high degrees of public scrutiny. 3. The names, titles, and telephone numbers of tat least five recent clients of your firm on projects of a similar nature. D. Fee Proposals anust include a per task fee structure And detailed breakdown of fees requirea (e.g. person-hours, consultants, reimbursed expenses, etc.), not to exceed 315,000. E. Selection criteria In reviewing and evaluating proposals and qualifications submitted, the Selection Committee will consider the following: I. Experience in preparing Historic Resources Inventories which have been effective; ` ?. Proposed approach, tasks and methodology to be used in providing the required services; 3. :Appropriate distribution of responsibilities within the project team in the event of a project team; �. Qualifications, experience and availability of key personnel: 5. Record of successful relationship with other publie clients; 6. Ability to meet project schedule; 7. Reasenableness of proposed fee and fee structure in relation to proposed work plan; 8. Demonstrated ability to present architectural and planning issues to public boards, commissions and citizen groups; 9. Demonstrated commitment to nffirmfative action in employee hiring and consultant sub-contracts; The above selection criteria are provided to assist Proposers and are not meant to limit other consideration which may become apparent during the course of the proposal review and selection process. a. n .ill responses to the Etc�gi�est for Qualifications tare to be submitted, in the number of copies indicated, to: Mir. hike Adams The Huntington Beach Redevelopment Office 2000 :`lain StreetAth Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 to be received no later than 5:00 P.M., September 20, 1985. Should you require any further information, please contact .-Mr. Mike Adams at (714) 536-5582. We look forward to receiving your response to our request. Sin erely, ell `o!, Do a N. La Belle. Dep City Administrator/Redevelopment ol:8slp Enclosure 038011 5. ' • I � { � � ��• fir.y • •1 �9 q f d .: t •, • +. '1 ( I ( • f� / 1 ( (•• /' 1 l ,_',,�y �,'�1��''��• i 1'-1 r )/.j� •,• � � r•7�� i Va to [ • _ III _.� `�':i 1 ►+ ,.. � t �r I r' ' �� � � •�{� 1 f + � \ � `•t iri '•�A •'�•``y..r.. .w tr /•�1f..' J` , • /S}..�,• � ` i i1 . . • •� , �.t+ �) �•_ '�i r� r � /ttt{ + ,.t � 1 'I•Y1•• �lu { •,ia. • • _ ' w ... !! -� ��• r�'! Ird.we f .0A �� =�ii�J -y�LJ_•�•` Jrrt� a / • • !{ ... Lam. •fie i" .'.' 1 i �'i.' lt�•1•" *weft . 1��.r. RR...o .,••.+µ�._ '�: ! ,. . �t • �!� � ••�., 7 ,� � .• , f , lilt „ •'p• r,+ • • . ' �+ \ ' 4�`�,. ` ' ', •�\�/ ♦fry ` 1 , ( . a•KAt .Lee �. ) •, � ,r •. ! ). __LL � �. . •�. l �' t f 'tea .. • f' 1, ►% i t l• 1 ;'j f'1 .tr•f �• li •� - 'w r 1 •fr i• �f ` `� ,`�•�-f- ' .,� i,r 1• III y 14 �1 .t.+lt•s �.,/ /� \r} ` r•1 * 1 j Y. •\11C. ii—.e '•' .J ..p �r 1{i �' All, I it at � �.' /J� '� '— � . «fir,. •,� It 0. 1'!u u�tie:tl !=isttit' Ic:al is-'••. w � �' ; ii ,� itil l l+l 1 ii+= :it Ut= F.r 1:.1 '+: ,'- ..:.;7 •c•• ' t,.DO 1 � • .`~ •�� lei �'1.fw tl4t � � �w " ° ♦ . {11 Iti 1 7,' r ' � b4 ` LTTACIIIIENT NO. . ' HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY CONSULTANT SELECTION ANALYSIS PROJECT TEAM PROPOSED PRODUCTS COSTAIOURS' REMARKS Thirtieth Street Jill Sterrett,' . Survey Mitp 365 flours . Well-Rounded Team Architects, Inc. Urban Planner . Inventory Ileport $15,000 . No Public Jim Nilson, . Booklet Layout Presentation Architect . Slide Show Use of Local Diann Marsh, . I Workshop 6 - S Months Paid Volunteers Preservation Conslt. Project Manager will take a tnedicnl leave around 1/l/96 heritage Orange Maggie Latimer- . Survey Map I60 flours . Good firm History County, Inc. Starrett' . Inventory Report $15.000 . Principal in area, Enren Turnbull' . Final Report only 2 weeks per . Booklet Layout month Kathy Les, . 3 Presentations . Architect based Preservation I'Innner . f ti:carkshop in San Diego h'ayne [Donaldson, -f - 6 Months Architect Sanchez Talarico i-red 'rainrico* . Survey flap Time & Materials . Good Understanding Associates Principal . Inventory Iteport Not to exceed of city concerns IDana Privatt . Final Report $15,000 . Good knowledge of Assistant Planner . Booklet Layout Governmctzt process . Limited use of Roger llatheway . 3 Presentations 4 - 5 Months Volunteers Architectural . 4 Workshops No Architect on Preservation Consit. team HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY CONSULTANT SELECTION ANALYSIS PROJECT TEAM PROPOSED P11ODUCTS COST/110U11S REMARKS PP1Pr�nin� John Bitterly* Su;Survey Map 328 Hours . Use of in-house Consortium Principal . Workbook .$14,982 survey team Dean Brown . Inventory Iteport . No cirm history w/ Principai . Final Iteport 4 Months similar projects . Booklet Layout . No architect on . 1 Presentation team Johnson Iieumenn Leslie lleumnnn* . Inventory Report 550 (lours Los Angeles based Research Assoc. Principal . Final 'lap $15,000 firm. Christy ?11c Avoy . Booklet Layout . 11clivt! use of Principal . 2 Workshops 6 Months volunteers Dawn Jacobson . No public pre- Research Consultant sentations [fill Doggett . Ho architect on Photographer team 'i'roject Manager 1443h -- Ak rTACHMENT NO. S HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY SELECTION COMMITTEE Arline Howard H.B. Historical Society Heritage Committee: Susan Lucio " Jerry Person " Guy Guzcardo " ,Maureen {fivers " Barbara Milkovich " Bill fowler Community Services Department, City of Huntington Beach ,like Adams Redevelopment Office, City of Huntington Beach 1434h t���r ..+'i�,�..,,,,�y"y,�.,.xl=__ ';~�;��.�?;;° ���.�,.�y+� ��� ., ��;��,try����4�+a1� ��,'�,',��� (}' �� ,, � ,� ,�� �'�\► .�", ��'�.+4tr/�s+�:'"yr�"'�}fti��x 1�i ,N'S•S ► �,+•' � � �'� •''�yY ;i tW ► � , ` �'; •r�s'"` j'"�('�'`} ''tii'1 .f' 1����!•s '�+ '�r !. 'p�.lr.1 1"h.S/C.b: ��•�'�^e • ►1.'fr +.( t r r� iyy r(' � '► ` r ►" / a Y�,�r •t j (J:.. ` 5?.e:K f;r. •T'1�•.••. r � r. -••�M rr�•1+3•'R� � xti i � 'A,4/iR• F ((}}'}k ��F� rf�+•"• 1(a t"4}!�1•!M{'/� •�i+1 �TJ� �.7.1 T•i .4 N:( �•,[�I..JF{ C�1 a o f4S.1 t + 'Y ;�;�•�P4� "'( 17,A '.IilY/,!�i���'7:ir,� �ir� r � ���/ yjj{ �rt �S••i �t�t .P'!�_ t-I•J, 1' s/. • .iii+�y��4• � j Y•TO Y*�'k', '�9�'t�.1.���i.�fr; 1111 F .+. 1w•. c y' +�Ar4. 'j�i•�a 4' ,4 ?"{♦'�a JR 31�r If•.4i•-•1�yf<S )y , �1'Tr'�,t�ip,.�xt...i fi,.,f%.r�.(..{"�./•wj•+"a r,$I -i�•w'"• '+I+Y��•ia�.�•-r.lr•Y�.,,.:,'�\'�4�t k..'�y}t t�,'4''►sl�1ti'i�-Lyrr.Y�'t.R d n�.{+.�lfj.r�y',t`\!.+•I.S}Ss"$wf'i ty+:V}}ir jayI w:;+'-'.1,:��+••YF�sj,•}S•.�;'P.f�'),�'#3..M+`a.'rrr�.•rIw,1''.•4•..,^:y'•e,+• +i•�.�...S,.f:a'7Ei'.�ry•�r.'•.2r l.fY�+,�`�••L}`'�\�',•)i.Ly.(..t,►N'(a54l4�y•„(:•3S.,�.«fy4+tr.v tv-y�t•-,".'t•':r.1 3F�...(�rt-Vi t`p.i•'!r.,:y�•,:U 04 T41; ":;: •`' � a't''1.r.R./a'!.7}L•••r•�..V`r ?-.`.�-•.�fi...{r��,7.'�.,•i�t�F:�1(fI;:.v".t:`�;:;i4►..(lI.Ti f•:: :r.•' ,st(ti l��+�i'r+•'.;-�, ,ss rti -,k1 r £'4 { �.;>i -'�`,l.• f' �•. r°j ,i�,@;v41:,•.:T+ ; t t�'.'.+..yr µ•'�' .n"• -s �.f { I �. b � «,r f � a +, 1 • �`.�A it l+•`'.1 •5 '.(.. 4 vr' +•>l '►• ' A PROPOSAL. T*,O PREPARE AN' �HISTORICAL - 00- URVIEY - ,- .--". - -. - . . . . . r r City of Huntington Beach i P 1 , fa °S r i w- h 4 � f '+ �t�eet a chitebt� i�.e thirtieth s 7 t` .. 1 M �d vr'. •1. , 7 ++ i.-•(.`i^''�t�v y �..} i r*�"f.�!�•{` �� 7 �. '�y � a •` ...4 .\ 1, x C. -. =,d'�"� .t. '` ., ,�P�. �5 itF i °rr r ►yrs,,, + . ,, R• t +. I c�a'i�! iw,..(1.! "t i,y •. t 7.►a ;tom; lj�,: r• yy� i 3. Phase 1; Biro Idantificatim OLPmram ag=sltion The se of this phase purpose , ph is to provide the consultant team u�nd�ers with No sufficient knowledge of available resources to be able to develop a detailed methodology to be used in subsequent research._ By clearly defining the methodology at an early stage and reviewing this approach with the staff, both the City and the consultants can be assured that the study process is s acceptable to the City and one in which they can participate. 1. 1 The Project consultants will meet with City -staff to review the overall project purpose, City concerns and available data. 1.2 Data resources identified by the consultants, along with any other source noted by local librarians or the Hsntington Beach Historical Society will be investigated and evaluated as to their usefulness in future research. 1 . 3 A windshield survey of the City will be conducted on a meet-by-street basis. Each of the structures or sites to be inventoried will be reviewed briefly. The purpose of the windshield survey is to develop a specific docL=ntation of all pre-1946 structures in terms of address and building style and to evaluate these building for further research potential. 1.4 A detailed statement of proposed methodology including sources and resources, survey form, and architectural terminology to be used will be prepared. This material will serve as a basis for the training materials to be distributed to volLnteers. 1.5 The project consultants will meet with the City staff to review the proposed methodology and to discuss the recamende-d inventory list. t Products of this phase include: 1. A detailed statement of proposed methodology. rt . 2. A complete imyentory list of all pre-1946 structures in the designated survey areas, listed by address, and including a rating and architectural style identification. b. Phase 2; —Publicity., R= u.J=xm � a, Training of Volunteer;: The purpose of this phase is to gather and organize the survey resources -- including voluszteers, training materials and survey materials. 2.1. Thirtieth Street staff and our subconsultants will organize Volunteer Training Materials including style guides, sample completed State Inventory Porms and oCier informational resources. r r 1'g r 2.2 Thirtieth Street staff will organize Field Research Materials including field checklist forms, State Inventory pForms and muips for each areas to be surveyed. If volunteers are available through the Historical Soclety, they will begin to photograph structures cn the inventory List. 2.3 Thirtieth Street staff will organize the content of training sessions to include slides and disctmsions to attract the interest of volunteers and generate excitement about preservation. 2. 4 Slides taken during Phase I will be included and a presentation prepared and given for the City Council on the 'objectives of the survey. 2.5 Project staf f will conduct a training session as part of the "Su:vLy Etz" day designed to provide an intensive introduction to architectural styles as well as familiarize volunteers with survey procedures. Later training sessions will emphasize records research methods, mapping, or other aspects of volunteer work. Products of this phase include: 1. Training Materials for each volunteer. 2. Field Research packets for each property or area to be surveyed. 3. Presentation matca;ials for training sessions and for the City Council. c• Ptt� 3-. --` uayey Rem arch and EyAluaLj= This phase is the core of the study process and has as its objective the compilation of information as needed to complete the Historic Resources Inventory Forms to be acceptable to the State Office of 13i.storic Preservation. Wle propose to initiate the field work portion of the survey with a massive all-out effort - a "Survey Blitz* day - using teems cf: volunteers per block and staff advisors. We feel that this concentrated approach can provide a sense of community among the volunteers and generate enthusiasm and a network of support for their efforts. Review of the forms completed would be conducted by the project staff and could be followed up (if needed) by individual volunteer work as time permits. 3.1 Field work will be completed by the volunteers cn each structure to include photographing L'he structure preparing a sketch map, completing a field inventory form describing the architectural desigi and details of the building and talking to neighbors to learn about the history of the house or building its cx+ners and the area. Where possible photographs will be taken prior to the "Survey Blitz" day and will be included in the Field Rp-search packet for each structure. 3.2 Project staff will review all field survey cork and revise this work as necessary to insure -,=leteness and accuracy. :r J" �44 Z ; r • f V 3.3. Research will be completed on each identified structure to include a review of Sanborn Maps, local public records and city histories. The research will be directed at ascertaining the year of construction, major modifications to the home and current and farmer owners. 3.4 General research will .'be conducted to identify sites of historic ` happenings, major events in the City's history, the 'role played by the City in regional or state history and, buildings, sites or objects which bear local historical significance because of their connection to significant events or persons. This research can be part of an on-going process of historical research to be conducted by Qeubers of the Historical Society, study volunteers or students of the City's history. 3 .5 The project consultants will meet with the City staff and the Historical Committee to review the results of the inventory and general � research work periodically throughout the project as these are eomleted. 3.6 Each Inventory Form for 'A" and "©" Rated structures will be completed including a UTM and tbtional Register designation number, assessor parcel numbers , use of glacene envelopes for photos, sketch maps , and other requirermxtz in accordance with SHPO requirements. 3.7 Final review of the inventory materials and napping will be conducted with the City staff and the Evaluation Committee to evaluate the consultants recommendations on which structures are remanded as local landmarks, which structures may qualify for listing on the National Register of Historic; Places and areas which may to considered as potential historic districts. The products of this phase include: 1. Completed State Historic Resources Inventory Forms on each of the "A" and 'B" Rated structures on the recommended inventory list, plus Inventory Forms including relevant information for the local or district designation of C-Rated structures. 2. Dr.:umented general research on the City's history and role in regional or State development. d. pbase .4: Precaratign of inyent.ggy Dxu 11ts The purpose of this phase is to ref ine and coordinate documents prepared during the study process to cohesive final product and to prepare related documents or materials for public information. . 4.1 An Historical Resource Inventory Report will be prepared which: 1) DocxmDents the nature and purpose of the study; 2) Describes the methodology used to conduct the survey, including both blank and sample omplete3 forms; r� t y r 3) Slmmarisres the volunteer involvement and .training prooessy 4) Includes copies of-forms and lists resources used; 5) Dis'caes the significant findirM of both the specific and general Irea es .rch efforts; 6) Identifies significant structures; and 7) Includes recc=endations derived from the study to form a basis for the reservation programme And future studies. 4.2 Maps will be prepared which do6went the location of surveyed structures and which identify any clusters of structures suitable as historic districts. 4.3 Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. will prepare the text and layout for a public relations brochure or booklet describing the 'develonent of the City and highlighting the important survey findings. We recosmnend that our staff prepare illustrations for the documnt and have shcnm an estimated optional cost for doing so. Vk are also capable of completing the final editing and layout, if requested to do so. 4.4 Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. will review the products of the study with staff and Historical Comnittee. Minor changes will be code as needed for clarity or to respond to local concerns. 4.5 The project manager will attend Planning Commission or City Council public hearings on the documents prepared, as requested to present the findings of the study. These two meetings hare not been budgeted since they were not requested in the City's RE?. However, if requested to attend, the meetings would be billed based on our standard hourly rates. The products of this phase include: 1. Completed Historical Resource Inventory Report. 2. Mapping of survey results. 3. A public relations booklet text and layout. 4. 35 arm slide show for presentation of the study findings to the Planting Ccn nission and City Council (optional) . • r J 4 '4 • r , it � r; 16 W. Fourth1 • Sant2 Am, Caliromi- 1 r J L • r y 1yJ • ' f r / ' 4 , '9 p 11 ` e P w 1 V � • 1 1 � � Y PHASE I - RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH 3. .Determine Buildings to be . Sistyeyed Utilizing our knowledge of architectural history and local historical development trends, the survey boundaries and loca- tions of pre-1942 structures will be established through vi- sual observation. 2. Con Preliminary Windshield Survey to Determine Prevalent Styles Based on known architectural styles and vernacular adaptions, a Windshield survey Will be conducted to obtain an overview of existing architectural history in the survey area. Informa- tion obtained will be used for volunteer community orientation materials and education. 3. Phot22raeh Buildingn in Survey Area To meet photographic documentation requirements, each building and home will be individually photographed to provide avail- ability of photographs curing rr:mainder of survey. All re- cords will be kept on photo logs administered by us. 4. Initial Contact with . Huntington Beach Historical Groups to Publicize Survey and Begin Recruitment of Volunteers An open meeting to rear:h those interested in participating and volunteering in the historic survey will be held. 5.. City Council Prenentat.ion A preliminary presentation will be made to City Council to introduce them to the methodology and obJectives of the His- toric Survey. 6., si;ablish Administ_ative System for Cataloging, Documenting, and Record Kee2inq with Regard to Bu1la3:nc3s In coordination with existing planning maps and with required documentation proceduures, an administration system will be developed to break down survey into individual geographic increments. Included will be development of appropriates field survey form. 70 Prepare Publicity Pier Utilizing expertise in public relations, graphic communica- tions and architectural historyr appropriate flyers will be 'developed to introduce survey and to solicit historic informa- .tion from members of the community. 3 1 8. Conduct •Initi,al" Research to Detecmine Resource Materials i.e., Ma sRecords*Books) Available to Assist in Survey Based on knowledge of maps and legal records historically used in city and county planning, investigation will be performed to determine what resources are available with regard to the historic development of Huntington Beach. Primary emphasis will be county records that can assist in dating. buildings. Other primary resource materials will be sought Which can provide historic information on pre-1942 buildings. 9. Establish Research Methodolo Based on Available Materials Utilizing knowledge of documentary criteria required by the State, an expedient and thorough research methodology will be established in accordance with availablle research materials. 10. Recruit and Establish Historic Survey Advisory Board An Advisory Board will be established to include a cross- section of qualified and interested citizens and City staff to monitor and review the activities of the historic survey. This board will become the citizen core of the Historic Sur- vey. They will act as the primary volunteers and will meet regularly to review progress of the survey and to provide input into the formulation of the Final Inventory. Board to be established by City staff or City Council. . PHASE II _ FIELD SURVEY AND RESEARCH 1. Set a and Stage Workshop for Volunteer Training/Community Awareness Utilizing education and training skills, one workshop will be planned, publicized and conducted in order to best orient local citizens interested in the Historic Survei and local community history. Emphasis will be on volunteer recruitment, but members of the community at large will be welcome to attend. The primary purpose of the workshop will be to train would-be volunteers in how to assist with historic research. 2. Conduct Sidewalk -Survey in BoundaEX Area Incorporating groundwork laid in Phase I and experience in previous field surveys, the field survey will be conducted to determine local architectural trends, individually important buildings, and styling techniques germaine to the area. 4 3. In . Coordinatinn with Volunteers, Ree�arch Date of Ori in and Basic Historical Backriroun o eux xn�s an& Hoics Utilizing established research methodology and previous exper- ience in historical research of architecture, pertinent infor- mation as to age and, where possible, original owner, archi- tect, builder and other historical associations will be ob- tained. 4„ Compile Survey Results on State Inventory (locks Utilizing previous experience in compilation of State Inven- tory forms, field survey and research will be transferred into itemized and textuual information so as to be transferable to State Inventory farms. PHASE III - DEVELOPMENT OF WORK PRODUCTS 1. Nap Survey Results Using known mapping approaches and graphic mapping skills, the survey results will be mapped as to age, architectural styles and historic significance. 2. Determine Properties Eligible for the National Register In accordance with State and Federal Requirements and utiliz- ing knowledge of National Register criteria, properties eli- gible for the National Register will be determined and will be so iteruized. 3. Identify Locally Significant Historic Districts and Neighbor- hoods If cohesive locally-significant districts exist based on arch- itectural and historic importance, they will be identified and presented as such on the State Inventtory Forms. 4. Finalization of Required Documentation Final Write-ups, sketch maps and technical information will be compiled for the City using prior experience with State re- quirements for forms. 5. Pceaenta tion to City Council A presentation will be made to City Council outlining the findings of the Historic Survey and the preservation recommen- dations * 5 .6. Community Presentation A presentation to the community at large will be held to highlight the findings of the Historic Survey including a slide presentation on prevalent architectural styles and a collective overview of the history of buildings documented in the Historic Survey. 7. Final Reports and Preservation Feasibility Recoacmendationa A final report will be prepared summarizing the methodology and findings of the Historic Survey. Preservation recommenda- tions as to the location of possible historic districts and recommendations as to the economic and architectural feasibil- ity of preservation of significant buildings will be made. 8. Text for Booklet A draft text for a future booklet on historic buildings and areas within Huntington Beach will be prepared. The booklet will cover major historic architectural styles and the history of the City as a whole and the individually significant build- ings. It is hoped that the text can be written concurrently with graphic planning of the booklet. Such will be possible if additional funds can be allocated for graphic design., reproduction and printing. PROPOSED TASK RESPONSIBILITIES Ms. Les will be the Project Director consultant in charge of all components of the Historic Survey and accompanying work pro- ducts. She and Heritage Orange County will have responsibility for: - All survey organization and management preparation of all farms, flyers, Final Inventory and Final Report. - Training and management of volunteers . - All architectural identification and final documentation on State Survey forms. -- Development of research methodology and execution in tandum with interested volunteers. Task responsibilities of volunteers will, be : Historic Rnsearch Participation on Historic Survey Advisory Board Contributions by City of Huntington Beach will include : Staff Liaison in all phases of project. 6 r7 f R�; i e � a��•aslslfti� r s ! wi rj• • •�• wit-33ss s_SS � j 1 4 b III. SCOPE OF SERVICES INTRODUCTION Our scope of services is based on the City of Huntington Beach' s Request far Qualifications ( RFQ) dated August 26 , 1985, discussions with Mr. Hike Adams , and visits to the proposed study area . In order to facilitate review by the City staff , we have identified each item by number and letter as provided on pages 3 and 4 of the RFQ. As noted in the Request for Qualifications , there are four primary tasks . These tasks are as follows: Indentification of historic resources survey area. ' Education of interested membern of the public to the City' s cultural resources . ' Preparation of historic resources survey. ' Analysis of preservation and redevelopment opportunities in the City. It is the intent of Sanchez Talarico Associates to analyze the local , regional , and statewide significance of the existing hisrorical resources within the community. These resources will be identified and reasonable programs for preserving , enhancing , relocating , or combinations of these and other strategies will be developed . We believe that the overall goal of the study should be to: "Preserve the historic nature and importance of the area while providing for economically viable redevelopment." The following discussion explains our understanding of the major work tasks av requested in items A-1 and A-2 of the City' s Request for Qualifications . PHASE I: RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION AND PROGRAM PREPARATION Task 1 . 1 Citywide Survey The City of Huntington Beach has identified a preliminary study area for survey documentation of historic resources . The three City defined areas are the downtown commercial core , the downtown residential community, and several scattered sites . The first task of the historic resources survey will be to conduct a windshield survey of the City. The purpose of this Citywide survey will be to precisely define the boundaries of the study area. 7 The Citywide survey will indicate if additional structures and/or areas should be included in the survey at this time . A generalized overview program for the investigation of cultural resources will be reviewed and approved by the staff . Task 1 .2 Major Areas of Investigation Sanchez Talarico Associates , after defining the overall study area , will survey the historic resources to include : specific buildings , objects , and design features . A preliminary written report and visual presentation describing the proposed study area and targeted resources will be presented r to the City of Huntington Beach Historical Committee . ` During the presenta:ion to the Committee , we will also discuss our proposed survey methodology and suggestions for volunteer involvement in the 1 project . After consultation with and approval by staff, we will present the objectives of the historic: resources survey and our initial findings to the Huntington Beach City Council . Task 1 .3 Historic Resources Survey After the approval of the major areas of investigation by staff and review of the historic resource study objectives by the City Council , Sanchez Talarico Associateg will prepare the historic resources survey. All structures , objects , and design fentureg identified in the preliminary survey will be subject to detailed analysis and evaluation . Site specific data will be entered on a State of California Resources Agency Department of Parks and Recreation -Historic Resources inventory" form (DPR 523) or an equivalent form . Photographs will be taken of each identified resource and Trapped in relationship to immediately adjacent uses . Task 1 .4 Alternative Strategies Sanchez Talarico Associates will prepare an evaluation of the slgn'_ficance of each historic resource identified in Task 1 . 3. After the statement of significance has been prepared , it will be presented to staff and the Committee for their review and consideration . Working with the City Staff , we will then develop a series of alternative strategies for the historic resources impacted by eminent redevelopment activities . Each alternative will be presented in such a manner so as to gives the staff and decisior;makers an understanding of their full implications . Task 1 .5 Inventory Document(s) In conjunction with the staff and Historical Committee , Sanchez Talarico Associates will prepare a Inventory of Historic Resources and a Summary Guide to Historic Resources . The detailed Inventory of Historic Resources vi11 first be prepared in draft form for review by staff , the Co=ittee , Planning Commission , and City Council . The Inventory of Historic Resources will contain an executive summary, historical review of the City of Huntington Beach with emphasis placed on the , study area , methodology, survey forms , maps , inventory list , and suggestions for implementation of survey findings . The report will be presented in a format acceptable to the State. Historic Preservation Office . A final report will be prepared after direction by the City Council. The final report will be presented camera ready to the City for distribution to interested parties and the State. In addition to the major work effort a Summary Guide to Historic Resources will be prepared . This document will be prepared as a brochure , booklet , or foldout map with text . The summary will highlight the findings of the survey in the context of overall development within the community. A rough layout and illustrations will be provided to the City. After review and approval by the City Staff , a final camera ready copy will be provided . PHASE II: EDUCATION AND MEETINGS Task 2. 1 Workshop Meetings t Sanchez Talarico Associates will conduct four community workshops during the preparation of the historic resources survey. The primary purpose of these workshops is to expand awareness of cultural resources found within the City of Huntington Beach. They will serve to involve the Historical Commission and the local community In the process . The natural outcome of generating local interest in the subject is the involvement of the co=unity in cultural resources . The workshops will be presented as a series and take place Viroughout the preparation of the work effort giving Interested individuals the opportunity to follow the steps involved in the preparation of a historical resources survey. The First Workshop we will present an overview of the objectives of the survey, explain how the study area was defined , and explain how the survey will be prepared . I 9 The Second Workshop will take participants into the study area to provide them a better view and understanding of the cultural resources . The field visit will be proceeded by a visual presentation. This workshop will not only present the project area resources , but it will also solicit information from the public. The second workshop will explain step-by-step how a survey is conducted. Architectural styles and design features will be defined using as many examples as possible from the study area and the City of Huntington Beach. Selected structures from the study area will be reviewed. The -ard Workshop will take place subsequent to the preparation of the survey forms . The workshop will serve to present the findings of the survey. While the workshops will be presented as a series , all pertinent data will be reviewed at each session. The third workshop will provide the Committee with the actual forms used in the survey by the Sanchez Talarico Associates team. The Committee will be asked to comment and generally review the information. It is anticipated that the Committee will be able to help at this time in the final documentation of this phase of the work effort . The Fourth Workshop will be the final workshop. At the final workshop the findings and recommendations of the work effort will be presented to the Committee. Alternatives for historic resources will be explained and reviewed with the Committee and the rationale for each team recommendation will be presented . The draft Inventory of Historic Resources and Summary of Historic Resources will be presented to the Committee . Recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council related to the draft reports from the Committee will be summarized and presented to staff for inclusion in the public record relate to the work effort . Task 2.2 Planning Commission ?Meeting The Sanchez Talarico Associates team will make one presentation to the Planning Commission . The presentation to the Commission will summarize the findings of the work effort . Special emphasis will be given to providing the Commission with a background that will enable them to provide the City Council with sound recommendations related to historic resources . Changes to the draft documents requested by the Planning Commission will be properly noted for inclusion in reports to the City Council . A record of the Planning Commission actions related to the documents will be incorporated into the final document . a 10 Task 2.3 City Council Meeting The Sanchez Talarico Associates team will make one final presentation to the City Council . This presentation will build on the recommendations of the Planning Commission. Ai with the Commission , special emphasis will be given to providing the decisionmakers with the information necessary for informed decisions related to historic resources in the community. Subsequent to the presentation to the City Council and action by the Council Sanchez Talarico Associates will compile the final documents . '� ;� t ��y' ! f- P8'a( .�''' ••'.., :�'`"�i'�">' TR TrI 1 ti♦ 1rA;-:7,{�• r r i ¢ ify.�r.S•. tr pia'J ' j, wbGlK, rS•rrt / ir�"l+b:= �..• } t '✓ sc 1 }� t y t 3'� a' a�, 1-.+.•. .�" tr.>»,,,� � jyylM.:j,, q� �1,4. a• +�1. -,�� pp,�¢/ -� ,..�,C .. !'•'llt qt •aia j,�wai'9i!. b;'�..u.�wj � .rt�T'�` ,�r' 114+r b•<�' {' y. a .„. '.,w �,ti ifi. '• �t•T •'sr li•~a iT1 l.fr:V•.:fyk". '+'4 L!•:. A',iij'"'-f ir7t tr/�►r"V�-.fA�` ;. " , 't r1Ar Xr:t'-,i y, I' i ►;•'t Il.t ��'✓+.. wS.�rF' r.,' _ „•,(�� }�. .t M7y� j ! .t i•'t �.q+r -0-0lP _."1 F r ,�(, i' hr1 .�:Y t :v..,r•. , '+" r -y ✓ Poo �+`!17, ``r t f�I `a,.sry#'7C `Y,'��,�'�y��► ?• M�` � 'i�f,(.'"i�f,�d a;�\���►�err� { v.:•`� : , . a =t. ��r' I��$g��`tl,� i rlf +r:. �.{.!''t�,' /♦ ••.) �'t+y..♦.�4a /g/ R�,''✓.�-, !` y6�,.�11'`� I��;�,r;�iM Sr�.k,'�•• 'ti,'•i�+ •4 fy, 1 :.tip t�. '' l�y.: r.:_ ♦ � *•!Fr,.. i :� } ry!. R ( .`�. ..,,��++ .w. *. . r.,. !f� l,- •`. • ' +•r .l �`a" r.!�� ,r. A TT'' 1�;. ti^itY iEt' .;=Y •'�.•PC'• '(' .! ..�•,f�r1-�'�, tl:�+„ tt�- `j'���.':,ats�'t txl?-w.qs�•M+k.Z i A^^�v�..r S'a:.l:.>+ .J.y,'c'-s+";,,�.i:::'ti+ �' il:�i,. cfs�1,�4 r+•:�t;M, `'� by"r�t 4.rti Pr.y•l.fa p,,+r•-t' .�.'i, ; r'•�• .t. t. a 's.4� .f r '1 • .•+ 7 �. A.S.~' _ r •>" _,•'. > , i Miry"�gIr,.ii�4ai°:••}i'tr+_, t t:�t�,rrr! •+„{ti.•! : yt�!.iS".i''P'=•7.i. Lam . �►�,+ Jsl,',aryt �:f .R„q ��•�.t1 •.,1' .1 a 't' f ^t • .e, �7. . ,"�. •. ;S+i<rSf '�.�s _'`: :.t t :�'.�',4„•-•t�l'. t,„q _71f�.�,.«; _+rc IITi,:.K. �,.•t :� I ,41 r . •a„r.�• t, t•«,x.r '.�.w, a:.lC•7.3tte ;�`• ,,,.A` .� „rr�.xy„t •. r�+•'f 1 �,+.•. f',;tifwit Z4 " ! r...:swj 1�. '"' r+1e •�y+y.. ,• r".,i , 4" �i x t •. !it +i r"1� t'.Fi♦1 i.4 r , ' ,,n2�.t,�:,•: ixS :.;"'7� »t�+, .# 'l.t:�r:rZ;le? ►L�'4aaT^,.l rj.�T i •x.� �'ai� .,t.•�i. 1-•, i a .. r •. •S �y^tt.'tf a4�;.•� yi,;ar �•'L4,=7 �!`...� �t ,;,� � �(•1. �::'*.L•.• -.rY• 'y��.'' ' ;y t-r - •'••+"t+ � 4 i " ar►'�r!'r•I`~ y 4.•.t' �`�-•R'a�` :i•y Via, ' '{:..�•f`Y1, f +i i•1 Wr -•i 7,;�,,5.•�r•(� '. •.^• `f w�.,. 1 r .. •i - + . , , •`�tf��k''f';N:'1» i` i. .e: {gtKt-.:� 1.1 ♦•n,r r` •1 +„ ••: ,il,`�•��•!l.' t•, .^•:;+f•(',i� L S ' r `•4F� :�:•*ti y.i • .r-=R. .. .rr T + q • r � llj%1'a T�"i .wila" .= +' ,. - .. ,, ` . . ,, �:� fir ,_ `PRQPQS�L= .Ta'• PREPARE ±A 100111111 r y i 1 dr.. �N`?I,- ^ , FAR „'THE ,CI1*Y , ,0F . . .HUNTIN(GTONA BEACH NI so rl r i k,.•4 3 + t /S. y- .L q _ + + ' {MN R/wwtl•pN'III.1d{"All STUMS :,.uE t. w1' .T4�'� s t..t•. ;y � r + ^r> t. 'i• ,1 , �+ p ti -t"q `s5 ,� r. �'b' •a �:4r•'a � .• •r a.r y ti f .. .. ,r l��o.�.5" t ~•! q _ .. fA a,T PROPOSAL.. :Tbl. PREPAEA COMPREHENSIVE HISTURIC RESOURCES SURVEY .i FOR THE . CITY OF MkINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA GENERAL APPROACH As described in the request for qualifications/proposals , the City of Huntington..Beach is in need of a Historic Resources Survey. We understand. that the survey is needed to identify all potentially significant historical and/or cultural structures and other resources within the City. The primary focus of our work effort will be upon the older downtown area bounded by Goldenwest Street, Clay Avenue, Lake Street and Pacific Coast Highway. However, we anticipate including a number of at-large sites located throughout the rest of the City. The Planning Consortium proposes to prepare a comprehensive Historic Resources Survey and inventory report which accomplishes the follow- ing basic work tasks and objectives : 1 ) Involve the local Historic Society and other concerned citizens in the effort to identify and document the historical and cultural resources of the City. 2) Identify evaluation criteria of historical and cultural resources to be surveyed based upon State Office of Historic Preservation guidelines. ' 3) Research and document all buildings , objects , districts and • comunity design features with historical , architectural or environmental significance. r 4) 'Mork closely with the Historic Society's Core Committee and the City to ultimately determine the level of significance of all historic and cultural resources identified in the survey. After careful review of the City' s proposal , discussions with City staff and representatives of the Heritage Committee 'of the Huntington Beach Historic Society and a reconnaissance of the downtown district, The Planning Consortium feels it has a clear Understanding of the scope of work necessary to complete the Historic Resources Survey. 4 w Our. proposed work tasks are grouped into four basic phases which ..Correspond to those outlined in the City's Request for Qualifications/ Proposals. This Work effort is summarized as follows: PHASE I PROGRAM PREPARATION AND RESOURCE. IDENTIFICATION I .A. Initial coordination with Historical Core Committee and City staff. I .B. Identify and formalize specific survey areas and at-large sites, prepare base maps. I .C. Windshield survey and photographs (slides) of Downtown study area and other portions of the City. I .D. Review research guidelines and criteria outlined in the survey workbook for the education and training of volunteers. I .E. Research and locate sources of historical information relevant to the survey. PHASE II PUBLICITY, TRAINING OF VOLUNTEERS AND COUNCIL PRESENTATION II .A. Generate publicity to solicite direct involvement and historic knowledge from area residents and to increase public awareness of the survey efforts. II .B. Coordinate with and train Core Committee volunteers for survey work. II .C. Prepare presentation and slide show for the City Council on the objectives of the survey. PHASE III SURVEY, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION III .A. Undertake comprehensive historic inventory and survey, with photographs (black and white) of all buildings and other historic resources included in the survey. III .B. Periodic meetings and workshops with the Committee and the public for review of the survey information and to obtain additional historical knowledge of each specific site. III .C. Undertake research as necessary to help determine levels of historic significance for important entries. III .D. Refine survey results and help the Historic Committee determine the level of significance of each entry. -2- 1 x • 1 PHASE IY FIRAL REPORT AND 'BROCHURE IY.A. Prepare final report suitable for subruittal to the State Office of Historic Preservation. IY.B. Prepare text and ro=ag'h layout for historic brochure or booklet. We view the volunteer role'`of the Historic Core Committee as the key component of "the survey., Their combined knowledge aind collective interest in the City.'s `historical resources makes them the logical choice for overseeing, and participating in the comprehensive survey. We.. anticipate over 100 hours of .volunteer field survey work in addition to attendance, at a.s many as eight to-. ten meetings ,and work- shops in a relatively short :period of time. This' committment reduces our costs substantially and provides us with valuable insights into the required research and in% estigation of specific sites. r_,r.This volunteer group. should also be . responsible for ultimately determining the level of significance of all survey entries, and for formulating historic policies and programs for the City Council ' s consideration. We anticipate the role of City staff throughout this process will primarily be 1 ) to provide information available within the City to the Historic Committee, the consultant and the volunteers, 2) to act as a liaison between the general communit and ourselves, 3) to review draft documents and other work, and 4 to participate in public workshops (le: setting dates and locations , advertising, P P 9 9 oversee and participate in workshop meetings) . The following Scope of Work provides a detailed breakdown of work tasks by phase and includes our proposed hours and budget for each task. A list of products and the time necessary to complete each phase is also included. 1 N � -3- r , n r ./A JOHNSON HEUMANN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES + 1 M . ' J ti i i. M i f . '4 f y , Y f; Fr AL WORK PROGRAM Phase I. Resource Identification and Programs Preparation. Task 1.1: Define survey criteria. In consultation with City staff, the consultants will develop defini- tions of historical and architectural resources and establish evalua- tion criteria predicated on State Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines. In this proposal, "sites" are defined as buildings, ob- jects, districts, and community design features which contributes to the historical and architectural character of Huntington Beach. Parti- cular emphasis will be placed on those residential, commercial , or institutional sites which are associated with the City' s early identi- fication with the tourist and oil industries. A building construction cut--off date of 1940 is proposed. Task 1 .2: Select Advisory Committee. The advisory Committee plays an important dual role in the survey. At the beginning of the project, the committee will be asked to make recommendations on sites and neighborhoods to be surveyed and to share their knowledge of the history of the area and its research resources. During the second half of the stud;, the Advisory Committee will review each site documented by the consultants (see Task 3.3) . In addition, the involvement of the Advisory Committee will constitute a portion of a community outreach and information program. Early appointment of the Advisory Committee will enable members to gain a thorough familiarity with the purposes of the survey and the evalua- tion criteria. The committee should include representatives of the City, the historical society, and other appropriate community boards and organizations. Expertise in the disciplines of architectural his- tory, architecture, landscape architecture, city planning, land deve- lopment , and construction are desired. Final selections for they Committee will be :wade with City approval. A %iximum of seven persons is recommended. 'Their knowledge of Huntington Beach's architecture and history will supplement that of the consul- tants, guaranteeing a more accurate, thorough survey. Approximately four Committee meetings are anticipated. Task 1.3: Develop research procedure. The consultants, in conjunction with City staff and the Advisory Committee, will locate sources of primary and secondary historical information pertinent to the built environment of Huntington Beach. The availability, dates, and methods of use of documents and collec- tions such as the following will be ascertained: Fire insurance maps. I t - Base maps. Tax assessor's maps and assessment rolls. - Subdivision plats. . - Land use plans and surveys. - Building permit records. - City directories. Local written and oral histories. Periodicals such as trade journals and local newspapers. Historic pamphlets and promotional materials. Existing architectural surveys. Local library and historical society holdings. Using the results of this investigation, the consultants will prepare a research manual. keyed to a research form, for systematic recording of research information. Task 1.4: Conduct preliminary survey. The consultants will identify potential architectural and historical resources in the Proposed historical Building Study Area delineated by the City in the RFQ. The preliminary survey will be accomplished in two stages: a first windshield survey and a second, walking survey during which sites will be photographed on slides. Organized by street, the resulting list of addresses will describe the basic charac- teristics of each site and will be submitted to City staff and to the Advisory Committee for review. Slides will be used for presentations to the public (Phase II) , and to the Advisory Co=ittee (Phase IIT). Phase II. Public Awareness and Volunteer Program. Task 2. 1: Publicity. At th+ inception of the survey, a publicity campaign will be coordi- nated by -,nqultants in conjunction with city staff. Promotional Mate- rials will. :alert the coarounity to the survey, focus the goals and objectives of the survey, solicit knowledge from long-time residents, and recruit volunteers for participation in the project. Press re- leases, subject to city approvil , will be prepared and distributed to local newspapers, community organizations, universities, and affinity groups which have a potential interest in the project. Consultants will make a short presentation to the City Council , clarifying the aims of the survey and its anticipated results. Although publicity efforts will be concentrated at the beginning and end of the survey, press releases can continue throughout the project, with the cooperation of the City. These can highlight discoveries as they are made and reinforce public interest in the project. Task 2.2: Volunteer recruitment. A successful volunteer program is one which is cost and time efficient, demands and achiQves a high quality of results, has a positive effect on the community's perception of itself, and most importantly, makes the volunteer feel involved and valued. Experience has demonstrated, however, that a full-scale, cost-effective volunteer program requires a greater budget and time allowance than is available for the current project. Therefore, volunteer participation in the current project will be directed specifically towards assistance in the research, mapping, and photographic phases of the inventory. Emphasis -will be placed on involving local residents and members of the academic and preservation communities who have prior knowledge in historic preserva- tion, architectural history, local history , and documentary photogra- phy. Volunteer commitments of at least five hours per week are desired. Recruitment will focus on these} segments of the community most 1!"ely to yield qualified volunteers and will form part of the publicity activities described in 2. 1 . The faculty of local universities will be alerted to the opportunity of using the survey as an independent study for appropriate students. Advertisements for volunteers will be sub- mitted to the newsletters of Heritage Orange County, the Huntington Beach Historical Society , and the Society of Architectural Historians Southern California Chapter. Prospective volunteers will be screened by the consultants. Tame 2.3: Public workshops and volunteer training. Interested -members of the community and potential % ' ,inteers will be invited to attend a consultant-led public workshop w'. 'i will address the goals and methods of the survey , review local histor , ind architec- tural development, and provide a forum for sharing of hilt . � rnl infor- mation and reminiscences. Special interest field session:, will be arranged as needed to train prospective research and photograph) volun- teers. These may include consultant-led tours through the re. -rh facilities in Huntington Bench City Hall , the Huntington Beach Puy Library , and County Tax Assessor facilities, as well as provide on-sit instruction in techniques for photographers. In addition, it is anti- cipated that the consultants will continue their teaching function on a one-to-one basis throughout the course of the volunteer participation phase of the survey. Volunteers will be supplied with a :purvey manual , consisting of the research guide, an architectural style guide, a brief history of Huntington Beach, copies of requisite survey forms, and an outline of survey rules and etiquette. h'hile principally intended for use by the volunteers, the survey training materials can be of assistance to further survey efforts beyond the scope of the current project. The City will be asked to participate in the volunteer training activi- ties in several ways. First , assistance in locating and ohtrlining permission to use a meeting room for the workshops is requested. Se- cond, access to City building permits and any other pertinent records, on a limited basis and subject to department approval, is necessary for the success of the training and the documentary phase which follows it. An official letter of introduction for each volunteer will enable the volunteer to identify him or herself when so asked. Phase III. Survey, Y(esearch, and Evaluation. Task 3. 1: Volwiteer assignments. �s Under the supervision of the coc-,sultants, volunteers will conduct course-specific research, take photographs, az.ke sketch caps, and de- termine UTM coordinates. Specific assignments Will be available at the public workshop and thereafter to enable vol.untLer to begin participa- ting immediately. Deadlines will also be announced so tha-, volunteers s can manage their time most effectively. b The consultants will be available to the volunteers for guidance as required , and will review volunteers' work for accuracy and quality. Thus, regular contact with volunteer is an necessity in this project. Occasionally, it may be necessary for consultants to have a phone and desk space in City Ball. It is also critical that a procedure for receipt of messages and assignments be worked out with staff or the city's designated liaison well in advance of volunteer involvement. It is suggested that a representative of the redevelopment office be responsible for this coordination. Task 3.2: Research and documentation. Using the preliminary survey list, consultants will write architectural descriptions, pursue site-specific research, coordinate black and white photography, and assemble required geographic data aimed towards com- pleting survey forms for identified sites. Research will attempt to establish dates of construction, the names of the architect or builder, original owner, and subsequent owners or tenants, and other biographical and historical information. To a large extent , retrieving this information will lepend on the nature of the + city's building permit holdings, and the: ,iunty's tax ussessment re- cords. Other sources of information on new building construction include the local newspitper and the Southwes* Builder and Contractor, which began publication in the 1890s. Utilization of these resources can be exceedingly time-consuming, and m.ay depend, to a large extent, on volunteer cornmi tment to the project. Task 3.3: Review of findings. The Advisory Committee will be asked to review each site on the preli- minary survey and to evaluate each, using the criteria agreed upon during Phase I of the survey. ConsulLants will c.)ordinate all meetings of the committee, provide the agenda, and appropriate visual material to assist in the evaluation process. All sites will be categorized at one of seven levels of significance, as specified by SOE1P. These categories are: 1. Individually listed on the National Register of gistoric Places. 1D. Listed on the !iational Register as part of a district. fi 5 r 2. Determined individually eligible to the Register �by the U.S. Department -of the Interior. 2D. Determined eligible only ag part of a district. 3. Appears eligible for individual listing. 3D. Appears eligible for listing only as a contributor to a potential National Register district. 4. May become eligible for listing when: a) more historic or architectural research i_s performed. b) the property is restored to an earlier appearance. c) more significant examples of the property' s architectural style are demolished. d) the property becomes old enough to meet the Register's 54-- year requirement. 4D. May be come eligible (as above) only as a contributor to a district. 5. Is listed or is eligible for listing under a local preservation or landmark ordinance. 5D. Is listed or is eligible for listing as a contributor to a locally designated historic district or preservation area. o. Norge of the above. Phase IV. Preparation of Final Documents. Task 4. 1 : Deteriainatinn of Eligibility Report. A Determination of Eligibility Report , written according to an accepted format, will be prepared to enable the City to accurately assess the architectural and historical resources in the project area and to make informed decisions about future goals and projects. The report will include a summary of survey purposes and methodology, a brief history and review of architectural development of Huntington Beach , highlights of the survey results and characterizations cf significant neighbor-- hoods, and recommendations for cultural resource ,management. All pro pert-'es accepter: for inclusion in the final inventory will be listed by address and by National Register Category. Cop; :!s of all form,.., and documents developed for the survey will be attached. Task 4.2: Final inventory. For all addresses rated 5 or higher, up to a total of 100 properties, 'California Historic Resources Inventory forms (DPR 523) will be pre- pared. In some cases, such doci=entat+on will consist of a single form for an identified street 'or neighborhood , with continuation sheets for each of the contributing pro pert ted ies. If the total number of documen sites exceeds 100, consultants will write forms for the most important neighborhood clusters and for sites potentially eligible for individual designation as local landmarks as determined by the Advisory Committee. The .rewaining sites will "be .recorded *on abbreviated survey forms which itemize the name, address, style, notable features, basis for signifi- cance, date of construction, and include a black and white photograph. 1 Task 4.3: Map of findings. Sites Hill be dapped in form dependent on the map resources discovered as part of Task 1.3. The map will indicate the location, address, and evaluation of each site included in the final inventory. Task 4.4: Brochure. A vital component of the public awareness aspect of the survey project is a brochure. Brochures translate technical information into a form which is understood and appreciated, thereby stimulating community self-awareness and pride. A text for such a brochure will be drafted and may include sections outlining broad patterns of Huntington Beach's historic development, capsule biographies of prominent citizens or builders, a brief architectural style guide, and/or highlights of survey findings. As specified in the RFQ, the consultants will suggest appropriate layout and illustrations, while the City will be respon- sible for editing, camera-ready layout, and publication. •� r I • 1,,, ,� Itrn Illtirr CI Y Ur 146NTINGTON BEACH, CALirORNIA 1• +: 1t• . I'X) _ Bv; 11++ntlu;tlrrl 111 a•h, (:A6i 8 "A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION . 1)2 This is to certify that tthq policies of In at described below have been inued'to the intuted by the undersignvid and acre in farce at this'lime: II these policies @re cancelled.or'changed in such p a`naiin`rr that will effect this casrtNicAlo. the insurance camp*ny preen to qir• 30 diyt prior writt4n notice. by mi111"to'City of Huntington Br ch,r. O: Qox 711. lWistington peech,'CRlilo�nia 9?fi4$. ALL ITEMS' MUST BE COMPLETED, ANY DELETION OR' CfiANGE IN THIS FORM SHALL. BE SIGNED AND DATED.`BY AN AUTNOHIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE INSURANCE COMPANY AND MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING'RV THE CITY ATTORNEY. Name of Insured T111RIL-TH �THEET ARCH I`I'I:i TS a 111C . _ Address of Insured -ZU1 11mort ©OuleyaI'd , tlelr� oi,G Beach , C 11I'ar I�i.�i 2fiG; Loc lion of Work or Opentiorts to be performwd Iltrrl t;l'�gL o11 Beach , CU1 i foi'n11� t?escrtption Of WtXk of Operations COi1dUet Or II I.131,0111C 11080111•ceS SUI'Vey for CI ty LIMITS OF LIABILITY NAME OF COMPANY POLICIES IN FORCE POLICY NO. E"wive ExplretIon In Thtw•ands 10001 (INS.) GENERAL LIABILITY ( ) COMPfi:.it FORM t CSL ( 1 PREMISES—!OPERATIONS Each Otxurer" 1 1 EXPLOSION AND COLLAPSE HAZARD ( ) UNDERWOUND KA*RO 1 i PRODUCTS COMPLETED OPERATIONS HAZARD II CONTRACTUAL INSURANCE l I BROAD..FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE f I INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS J PERSONAL INJURY AUTOM081LQ LIABILITY " i 1 COMPREHENSIVE FORM 1 I OWNED S n CSL Each Ocau.sc• 1 I "[RED I I NON•01NNE0 EXCEn LIABILITY ( 1 UMBRELLA FORM = I 1 OTHER THIN UMBRELLA FORM WORKERL'COWENZATION and 72WJT87152W 9/ I/85 9/1/86 Statutory Hartford incident $ EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Inds,mni ty Company Additional Incd Endorsarment• Not appl icaU a tU ,or :ersmpensa lanT"' a L 'd 1i d sut • Tif'� The insurer agrte•t that the City of Huntington Beach and its City Council, and/or all City Council appointed groups, committees, comnutsions. boirdi and any other City Council appointed body, and/or elective and appointive officers, servants or employees of the City of Huntington'Beach. when acting at such are additional insureds hereunder, for the acts of the insured,and such insurance shall I* primary to any insurance of its City of Huntington Brach, as their interest may appear. pale tlt+rpmhQr 17. I985 AVTHORIQ R PRESENTATIVE OF I7�URANCE COPAPAVY INSURANCECOWANY HartfordOttlt- Nome _ Add.. Assoc . Adinini5trat ors & Cotisultant5 Atic:.w �L30 S. State College Blvd. _ • c -)• 1 �.) c,tr _Brea , CA ntY 1 : : _ Pit Talabhor►• HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT Ito be executed by Insured) The insured • .agrees to protect. defend, indemnify, save, and hold harmless the City of Huntington Eleach its officers, agents. and employees'against any liability. lots. damage, ccitt. or expense by reason of any and ill liability, suits. claims. c4 mends, ludgrt»nts erw causes of notion caused b ins.rred, his em loyees, a nts or any subcontractor or by any third party arising out of or in consequenaa of the perfarmance of ny ct' s or art Ity fat which this certificate of insurance is furnished. '(1) Sole Proprietorship (2) Partner / ilxs (4) Oth ,,s``tate) ►►OLD HARMLESS SIGNED: . ee Inr Tltti (An rsew"I be printed or typed —� "wow•eth"natws.l nr I Titw ..,. 11 Cowpo►rtion,Two Otfken ine rt$*.or evi o/tutkai:rOon to bind Cotpor•tion. r + 1 �:,��'�..'" n� ' � . •� *py�sr•a, a ♦r✓!�.�ar41•j1. •♦• t�'�� 1 -+'=i��,i �%�fjr• "� � . s: # +\..:,�� )iKw 3. •,1R rRiF' �♦' m y, •e ��:'t, ^, •4a,•x•;"f t�.t•'� j, ,T:ti. q�!"c {�ssr.l; t�'� t e'f /Jt,�"•'j•pi}��.*•' +� t y{�,• , 4.7l. tf;'lr� .�t r�<4^Xa '.ti.jj!`; 1.�.r t" �3+.•jai F�1�}'�1.•..S ti+rrz.�L+•♦' S.S1 �Z' � 1 f�! a i t. ,.vt ,�.�" t' 1�.•S�1♦�}•�t I l ♦., tS•r ��/.,��'�Ay�a� _ ".;lr.,. ,� yy { 4 .Lt`A. ,1 A ♦t•' l'1 J �.,3 +• J c . . .t rf" a• r y{ i1RY °faR*,,',})1+f' + ]it�je �*v! •� Yr, w. .j j ( d` + � t`+ti ',?L+1 1"!*°r .•} � l,r,♦�r5 \4t.r.,.i[tl. A�f►TS � � 1 r .F �''it4..!_ :r Lt. tl ��,- i �..�yx»�i.�Sf+rf��iil,''�f•. r.s.-�t.,r...,,iy^�.4t��,,.�f t�'SS`7' j�,t�''� � r'i ,Rt• ���� �� 11 Q � 4T' A 111\YYY + `+ R�"r,..>.r.ji ,, y tjiw�I, j�t• t .»' :`��!:r , 1' r `�� i#•j +t< , t� ♦ !. lrsyY,,frlr�z:,i? si,esfs! +r1i?•ri�'• 3r.tifCv.}it ♦:1�rsF,s�a ,+t«LC..F"t.!y:wfY$ th � e . DAVCO INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. NO MGM tS UPON T fit CERT IF ICAI E HOLDER. TH'S CLATInCATr DOES NOT AMEND, ' rLy. 92631 ti ir11s COMPANIES ► « 1�_ {t j 2821 NLWPORI BLVD. 'Xi ri.T<�r NEWPORI BEACH, • • !� #l+ n., ovAl LL1i•�y . '`��' y� �i�._t"sti' •j..w 7t +L�t! '�'f �3"}1 G )' i v7•.Y d U,'w1 �.{ ���,�y� e•'�7i,tg}� ' y�e� a •tr +a]• r( ,ir^ ir'o►y . � t$f •' xS S•��` i��.�`••r"!'y2 pk ^. .x7e��� ♦,'.�i/V, t,'alY.:3t1.:ti�.rT•. ii+i+..'�'. SRNs r-:1<'tZ:�7..�'r.tS�.a•:ii'c1:�C4kh�.'Z,�,..5•�t.«vtP .tawU�'Itr�.4�a�,.ii ,t'�..��,F,y�♦�x!v�"iTtl�'!J r��+.a�j�c..i'�.�Hl.y�'.Jfirt:t'.��•+..►.,..�'?.t4'�}tr=lt,.".,.�,�.fr �4� rx • �»::. it •+ - I.Al _ ,�. . ,•r<tt+ 514� • � 1, ti•-r r' �.• .1• j .� . Yy� tC(+ '4.r, yR r • �{ ti. 7:a+• +•r•it is `' )r .t �i "CAN r' �'1+f�•1 r� ifiVsail 3 r�:1x�j!7� ti fi Jl}r i' w 7�?�yff�+ k 4� ".+ry ! ",t i 6J ».L+�3; }! S '. �l Yea 1 Y �': 3.; ..S�Hl.lty�.�::,«3.,1•'.. �;, •.?�'is•� i:4 ,, ► .d., n t SYe. }."�ti�. 111 MAIN S.REll • • • . :itrx t , BEACH, • ,• XL,:F;, Dt:PARTMLNI nL { ,�.jj �}n �)�j '•ta.ir�:�iiJe t�":},"' rfi�':�w•'_:.a.y•t j'' a�'3rf 1L. ♦.;`•b i (4Y�c,,.f' Zr�'A{p�'Y '{'Tr t''r.•r�•'-4 f'.,'•'. c`3 •7;i� f '�j,: i''y„ *.•�'j V•tiM 1�/�/�_ -T!, '!•'! �r'`�«..• .; of•}'1.:..a.'"♦3 na ��.r�, 1. ,« •L ff'i"j/r �rl jai Sil:�•'"' L` ;�:r:t:� ;Il.+�['w�jS •i �'�t•,�'x•` i71R/^v� ^ ..� i �•;►•. C •i ;.r[. a yi.. ,;�r .. t+L.'• •� 4a�+t.M ii. ;,.j'. R x ' i r•'dt. .. .� •s,• •! ♦aft •it ''• r 'ht' � f"i .� it. Y. ft` L:;r ''::y r<:: � ., ': .A:` >;i:.ttf'' M1'•' ..r, A �,,., ,� r .,�, sfy.' �; rf � '�. � .t +•r•i 4 {. ♦. ♦.. t �.•�. •J 1r ♦ , ■L�' •r:,•••f•t j ,; rr.1-"�. v. f .�`,:: .v,Sa'rY ':rr� :�;=L�•��+`.�f-3j�., +F.a-.i� ♦ a"�a�� r��.� � jt:b y�3 Yt.. "4:t'w..��.•»a�y`'.t3� !f!i i•.; ja �'%►.q' "R a:4 t. �; ► .��<, ,L. ,:p :"'t�, _ `i'r'••'j -.f;,+ ��. ,�; '#' Ct . ).a�.r�..-. t,r, ,,r }.tp �„1•,' �; )'i �'•" ?u`�•�,•("'-'i -s.� �=' y;'a•�,,, �,�y.'. ,�J .- \ � ' � ••�',: rf•i w\.. ' 1 i�i �� ♦�� .� 5f 14 .f.ij ll. .Ar ti,•.�}� �7 T r•.( a 1. L• y)!♦ ♦ }� �' � 't'. .•.�. ,1• r. ,.+„ :_`� T,�,., ti: 4hr' M i3 ,T'J'f . T 4 �-.. r1�: f•,�.f ,,f:. •` a ..f 3'•t .J +. r. ''iw �,'�' Y � b �'r� �,i,.1t•j •. w' ..��'1., L �' r:,r� �i,( yf, ./ S.♦.�, r f•1,t.+, r ♦ � w '1' p,..r� .i�•�y, 1•,!'.al."ar fT� K.�i t.. • 4 .♦. t.a,- 1. i,..t {• �-) a2 y^'S�j C f 4�;"Y�.t1." ..e'Rz i, 'f'33 .�"^s Y'i ^'.�, ,i. ..: .i r . ••4� i r • ,.s- rr� :, . .w.. s•• r, y• y 3" '�'- � �' t � 9,, r,x .r 7r. R�, 1^9,�'•Iiif�G•++yy��a"Y ii ti �•r � t...*.. `s ! .ti"i r.�.a •,j :r�r . iwz ..a; •;.�'7..^,.. j 1,,=.:.jt :J� .:rat y,�s� �-.,,�,•? "�!,':'.!,`..i.s1LL..:rF:tta��1,ea'liL:u:..wLt:»,ff:N,S:.r arz,.wk s,%ki�r-F.•.�.t+_>� t:.:\�".•j.��_ - ..k•e e�'. ©� r r • ISSUE DATE f AwA'M'f'6 * 4/11/86 F+ E'ER THIS CF•RTIFI64TE IS ISSUED AS MATTER Of INFORMATION ONLY AND CrAFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE NOES NOT AMEND, MCI]ANIEL—FOL3TS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. EXTEND OR %LTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED 81 THE POLICIES BELOV,. P.Q. PDX 836 TUSTIN, ULIFORNIA. 92661 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE CC♦yiP L .'.,A 1LE^ER IS:TEGPITY IN SRAM--E CG'.!PANY i�PA•�y I�tS�+%QED ` --•'-"----•� LE"IEF 8 f c o". A•:. .. NATIOtiAL CO'J2:CI L O;' Al—r040LI S'?, 0 KA'GZ C COUNTY, DWs OCEAN -D � 110 E. FIRST STREET, STE 1-2 __•EH SA!►A;, ANA, CALIFORNIA 92705 „ 1111 Ell «• r�: THM IS TO CEP:Irt THAT P'0X:JES Of INSURANCE LISTED SELOrr HAVE BEEN ISSUEDTO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOr THE POLIC► PERID01404CATED. N7TWTTH5T4NOJ41., AN1 REGUiREME►:T, TERW OR CO47TiO% Or A►'f CONTRACT OR OTHFR D?CUUEN' WIT- RESPEC' TC W-41C» 'Ht$ CERTIFICATE MAI BE ISSUED OF MAI PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED EV THE PDOMS DESCRIBEC HEREIN IS SUBJECT TL A_L THE TERVE EICLUS►DNS ANn COND+• I*NS OF SUCH POLCt£S COI w .'t:._�' �.___...--..-.ty_�.':M _ tN THOUSANDS �R - ~,p£ 1••j.•i•;:+�i,�_.G ✓',)-.•.. •..:►!J`.F' .J•s yV•.C.•,. _ • ' NV'r•.ti �."'r^" ;ham•"_' t, GENERAi LIABILITY F. A 1 .l •.M.I.+L.l."•C 1V '�v l.]1+t5`t r + t r . . ► ...�, pc•�i•3 AVM f—X S1'.oi^t': iY✓ J'?:�.` i`.'.:'t i. w I .«�. I�I Li J.f+1 f.� .' F.J..J� ._L L YiiT2 • _ .- A. EICESS LIABt:JTt ' wORKERS C:>upENSATID•y ..__� ..C__...._._.._..ti. «y ,w,,• AND EMPL01IrFra WAB4 'r #OTHER �S.Q,�`�1]�• ..t[i fiv£�sL,....♦E�S,. •30 DAYS . O':ICE OF CAI; ELLATI WILL.L t. BE GIVE!;, ENCZE'r". C,F :'P%'•,IE".,WHEREIN 10 DAY NOTICE WILL BE GIVE,': SH0%rLD ANY OF THE ABD%l DESCRIBED PO.KIES BE CANCELLED WORE THE EX- CITY OF HUNTINGTON' BEACH, PIIIATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANI WILL ENDEAVOR TO 2000 MAIN STREET MAIL • DAYS Wg"Eh 140TICE TO THE CEPTIVI.A1E IHDLDER NAMED TO THE LEF1,BUT f AZURE TO UA.L SU h NOTr►::E SKALL wtt`DSE IGATgh OR lU.i1ILM HU2tTINGTON BEACH, CALIFOF;:IA 26�6 Of AN1 KIND Uvlc* THE COMPANY GENTS 0 SENIATIVES. 0 1 I. �'• •• •./ 1 • :Tie • y • e it r., tur• �i�J..,41sn•�. r"Tyh N?'!• if. ►y �C: !. Xrl aC?�/'1['ti.'�, ,'" t%F � f�'•`� 'r ,.#• f:,'Fj4{5:." f.r�i,, `" dr ri� iZ+• i- 3�'r1 :■ti �if•i kr}. ►- 1,! (� i;: z 4� ..I ,'�,��• y. ! r� �_tJ y� +k. +F►k T j-A�.Tr i !s �I,ii" f •' } rt..YY t •.�1 f " t; �3' 1, 1•fjY i'}'./s� r, ► ;ti ) F' r 3 - i t I ?a f' ►�. c r 1'�. I`. 1 v t^ r . Y+��j 7}. •iljti�ffa?1'Jt`ur#+t�'vt�<.1' t "{a' i� ¢i� yt' 1f.�1� f r{i•�-,�' 'S.�:.r}! .'4FF✓i d� :a p7tbi; .k .�" $' ./ r rfS`, —23 °y�r't•r.0 41r. J1+. ti•��'ts;ttri� y�' r�" Xix�[Jl.� � i!''� r • • • iSi •rXTEND Oil �.✓ �f f Jt ' y ' , • �I arr 4'�ti1 r1007 E. CHAPMAN AVENUL A631 rULLERION, CA 1;j . towwl1...,s� fix j•„L • f•G ti -10"0111 BLVD. u .k} A I r ' ��s��t �•r v i w r. 4 f r��s5� .ir�1'.'�a• r a)•t,1l•■ry tt• �y' y'Aa r tfr; Wit, •_.`:fin ,a ..a ' 'ri %if-tIr rib•} i' h '�!. _ "" ,.y i.,�.i yi"�:+�" 'n+►�Y3i,• .ti'�#�y{ixi�•' � �. }y ';1�71G H �•J ��• '�s v+��tiili'c'#�'�:'�t'l�'`�;�4" _ +'�:'�• .�'?' �'�L, A-._. �.�'�. t�`�r. �j.hN�,`y1C.r [Ki C'Yi�-Y:•c�'f: `��;'ia�.k'Lrrt..tM�� �irf•� .^:'Y�R. .+.. _ i• iCITY • .,. • • • • iit�. • 1 ({' a r,. 12000 MAIN SfRILI �. THE i. • f, t '11-ILWINGTOrl BEACH, CA 92648 `•jAPAII sop • ,.x• ' �. 4 list r tRIMINI _ +t��yr�' ,j�"'�•; v t r.'?r•..y,+., y'F c•+Y.;: �}�a�f yy;;r�1��i, ' r•.`�. .•*„•-.i'•i`.ii r")*� '•)":r;`3i' s}f^:�1 +C:.�}t j ►y' i-wyiy, .1+' 'fry74� r•'�j1 r *.✓ , ik+ �.�, �.�;ry 1 '"�-trY v fy 1;, . c JhF�,.+a•• +?r��+1i/ y .r.•r, S t !' S•4.Yt�t •'�`L+�'�'� ��{ ''F7T ,'1t'• 1.?�.i �'I1:�*�'1.. .^' .�f.�''s 1COF1A.��t . .t�� g ,• _( ! +`;� ,.'} J)+ ,�._•tj�,+x}� 1!;'t�l'A.�f .3;�( i,j�ii?i:.�:fi �f +..�' .,t •� f !Y� r w a •t �' `4Z C+riK` t_ k .Y ♦!. 7• °� -'4 l;i '..''TM'y.�4 �- 4 �' i,4 k('F' j 1 !i t• .tom-; ti m'x � �'kk�ta.ir •4:' l,�t�� kv�-.,¢ i,.Y t��'t�• x;t t� +t',�7• ���� }, •�.._. �:.y ,-,�t�•-.�,�.�,,;' ..�: �/J. S J f�t�J �;. q,..d� iw f"+,t r �{�;� #�'i�� �„� �tk:q.!•!:':.,t.�1"��lr?'Si4a''��tL�..I;.z�i�•.:us,ul�.�1��1.��21�. ��'.�i��{+>�+`�v-r1'1+tii.•�'+�tL.�i.t�t.�.t=.�.:7 3+'t�+•�'•� 11 �� • - .f 1 I. ..I" .- l.! 4..„•�.i'���r.�. .�r1.is Y i f }T. ... {�ly"�i +viw4h.�.+�+1�:,.'�"Y - �� ATTI,CHKENT NO. 5 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT �BETA EEN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THIRTIETH STREET ARCHITECTS , INC. CONSULTANTS FOR CONDUCTING A HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this =QZ sue+ day of 19 =�.� by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , hereinafter referred to as "CITY , " and THIRTIETH STREET ARCHITECTS , INC. , a California corporation , hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT. " WHEREAS , THE CITY desires to engage the services of a consultant to su ervise and ad .iiiister and conduct a historic resources survey for the City of Hunti;.gton Beach ; and CONSULTANT has been selected to perform said services , NQq , THEREFORE, it is agreed by CITY and CONSULTANT as follows : 1 . WORK STATEMENT CONSULTANT agrees to supervise and administer the program set forth herein by the City for conducting a historic resources survey for the City and shall act as the representative of the City in connection with the research . The Consultant shall perform such work as identified in Exhibit A of this Agreement . CONSULTANT hereby designates Jill Sterrett , who shall represent it and be its primary contact and agent in all consultations with the CITY during the, performance of. this Agreement. 2. AGENCY STAFF ASSISTANCE THE CITY shall assign a st -f coordinator to work directly with CONSULTANT in the prosecution of this Agreement . 3 . TIME OF PERFORMANCE. Time is of the essence of this Agreement . The services of the CONSULTANT are to commence as soon as practicable after the execution of this Agreement and all tasks shall be completed in six months from the date of this Agreement , unless agreed otherwise by the parties . These times may be extended with the written permission of the CITY . Consultant shall perform all services to be performed in a timely manner as directed by the CITY ' S staff coordinator . 4 . COMPENSATION. In consideration of the performance of the services described in Section 1 above , the r.:ITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a fee FOR TIME AND MATERIALS AS STATED IN EXHIBIT "B" , provided that the total compensation to be Daid for the work hereunder agreed upon shall in no case exceed the amount of Fifteen Thousand Dollars (515, 000. 00) . 5. METHOD OF PAYMENT. The CONSULTANT shall submit to the AGENCY an invoice for each payment due . Such invoice shall : 2. 1 ) Reference this Agreement ; 2 ) Describe the services performed ; 3 ) Show the total amount of the payment due ; 4 ) Include a certification by a principal member of the CONSULTANT' S firm that the work has been performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. . Upon submission of any such invoice , if the CITY is satisfied that CONSULTANT is making satisfactory progress toward completion of tasks in accordance with this Agreement , the CITY shall promptly approve the invoice , in which event payment shall be made within thirty ( 30 ) days of receipt of the invoice by the CITY. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld . If the CITY does not appr��•.� an invoice , the CITE` shall notify CONSULTANT in writing of the reasons for nor. -approval , within seven ( 7 ) calendar clays of receipt of the invoice , and the schedule of performance set forth in Exhibit "II" shall. be suspended until the: parties agree that past performance by CONSULTANT is in , or has been brought into compliance, or until this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 12 hereof . 6. DISPOSITION CGF DOCUMENTS . CONSULTMT agrees that all materials prepared hereunder , including all reports , both field and office notes , calculations , and other documents , shall be turned over to the 3 . CITY upon termination of this Agreement or upon completion of services , whichever shall occur first.. In the event this Agreement is terminated , said materials may be used by CITY as it sees fit. Title to said materials shall pass to the CITY upon payment of fees determined to be earned by CONSULTANT to the point of termination or completion of. the PROJECT, whichever is applicable . CONSULTANT shall be entitled to retain copies of all data prepared hereunder . 7. INDEMNIFICATION, DEFENSE, HOLD HARMLESS . CONSULTANT hereby agrees to defend , indemnify and hold harmless the CITY, its officers , agents and employees , from and against any and all liability , damages , costs , losses , claims and expenses , however caused , resulting directly or indirectly from or connnected with CONSULTANT' S performance of this Agreement ( including , but not limited to such liability , costs , damage , loss, claim, or expense arising from the death or injury to an agent or employee of CONSULTANT, subcontractor , if any , or CITY, or the property of any agent or employee of CONSULTANT, subcontractor , if any or CITY) , regardless of the passive or active negligence of CITY , except where such liablility , damages , costs , losses , claims or expenses are caused by the solo negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY or any of its agents or employees including negligent omissions or commissions of the CITY its agents or employees , in connection with 4 . r the general supervision or direction of the work to be performed hereunder . 8. 'WORKER' S COMPENSATION . CONSULTANT shall comply with all. the provisions of the Workers ' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California , the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto ; and all similar state or federal acts or law applicable ; and shall indemnify , defend and hold harmless the CITY from and against all claims , demand , payments , suits , actions , proceedings and judgments of every nature and description , including attorney' s fees and costs presented , brought or recovered against the CITY , for or on account of any liablity under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement . 9 . ItJSURANCE. IN addition to the *Workers ' Compensation Insurance and CONSULTANT' S convenant to indemnify the CITY , CONSULTANT shall obtain and furnish to the CITY the following insurance policies covering the activities pursuant to this Agreement : A. General Liability insurance. A policy of general public liability insurance , including motor vehicle coverage. Said policy shall indemnify CONSULTANT, its officers , agents and employees , while acting within the 5. scope of their duties , against any and all claims of arising out of or in connection with the PROJECT, and shall provide coverage in not less than the following amount : combined single limit bodily injury or property damage of ,$500, 000 per occurrence. Said policy shall specifically provide that any other insurance coverage which maybe applicable to the PROJECT shall be deemed excess coverage and that CONSULTANT' S insurance shall be primary. Certificates of insurance for said policies shall be approved in writing by the City Attorney prior to the commencement of any work hereunder . All Certificates of Insurance (and the policies of insurance or endorsements thereof) snall provide that any such Certificates and polir- *4.es shall not be cancelled or modified without thirty ( 30) days ' prior written notice to the CITY. 11 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CONSULTANT is , and shall be, acting at all times in the performance of this Agreement as an independent contractor . CONSULTANT shall secure eit its expense, and be responsible for any and all payments of all taxes , social security , state disability insurance compensation, unemployment compensation and other payroll deductions for CONSULTMT and its officers , agents and employees and all business licenses, if any, in connection 6. with the services to be performed hereunder. 12 . TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. All work required hereunder shall be performed in a good -workmanlike manner . The CITY may terminate CONSULTANT' S services hereunder at any time with or without cause, and whether or not PROJECT is fully completed . Any termination of this Agreement by the CITY shall be made in writing through the City Administrator , notice of which shall '.)e delivered to CONSULTANT as ;provided in Section 16 herein . 13 . ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING. This Agreement is a personal service contract and the supervisory work hereunder shall not be delegated by CONSULTANT to any other person or entity without the consent of the CITY . 14 . COPYRIGHTS/PAVINT'S . CONSULTANT shall not apply for a patent or copyright on any item or material produced as a result of this Agreement , as set forth in 41 CFR 1-9-41. . 15 . AGENCY EMPLOYEES AND OFFICIALS . CONSULTANT shall employ no CITY official nor any regular CITY employee in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement . In accordance with California Government Code Sections 1090 et seq. , but subject to the exceptions therein set forth , no CITY official or employee shall be financially interested in nor derive any financial benefit , either directly or Indirectly , 7. from this Agreement. 16. NOTICES. Any notices or special. instructions required to he given in writing under this Agreement shall be given either by personal delivery to CONSULTANT' S Principal (as designated in Section 1 hereinabove) or to the CITY' S staff coordinator , as the situation shall warrant , or by enclosing the same in a sealed envelope , postage prepaid , and depositing the same in the United State , Postal Services , addressed as follows : TO CITY: TO CONSULTANT: Mr . Mike Adams Mr . Jim 4 ilson Principal Redevelopment Plannner 30th Street Architects , Inc . 2000 Main Street 2821 Newport Boulevard Huntington Beach , CA 92648 t:ewport leach , CA 92662 17 . ENTIRETY. The foregoing , and Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto , set forth the entire Agreement between, the parties . IN W ITNESS 'WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by and through thei r authorized officers the day , month and year first above written. CONSULTANT: CITY OF HUNTING`I'ON BEACH n me/title ' �YF w .1jr1iyar. 1•I �GgJ'� ., ATTEST- .. na a/ti 1 p City Clerk 4 s OR REVIFAED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM : • ' f / T • • • city Attbefiey ♦ w , APPROVE v ZLO y � _ Dedul-y ity Administrator •. Vedevelopment MA: lp ' ` , i i • r If � r A • 4 ' I • f . r r t r r • + , i t ■ EXHIBIT A a. Rhase 1_-- -R,esgurgg ldgRti fiotic�i . nd P ac w RK!aVaratign The purpose of this phase is to provide the consultant team members with sufficient knowledge of. available resources to be able to develop a detailed methodology. to be used in subsequent research. By clearly defining the methodology at an early stage and reviewing this approach with the staff, both the City and the consultant acceptable s can be assured that the study process is eptable to the City and am in which they can participate. 1 . 1 . The .Pro;ect consultants till meet with City staff to review the overall project purpose, City concerns and available data. 1.2 Data resources identified by the consultants, along with any other source noted by local librarians or the Huntington Beach Historical Society will be investigated and evaluated as to their usefulness in future research. 1 . 3 A windshield survey of the City will be conducted on a street-by--street basis. E,,,b of the structures or sites to be inventoried will be reviewed briefly. The purpose of the windshield survey is to develop a specific documentation of all pre-1946 structures in terms of address and building style and to evaluate these buildings for further research potential. 1.4 A detailed statement of proposed methodology including sources and resources, survey forms, and architectural terminology to be used will be prepared. This material will serve as a 'basis for the training materials to be distributed to volunteers. 1.5 :'he project consultants will meet with tt,e City staff to review the proposed methodology and to discuss the recommended inventory list. Prcd.,cts of this phase include: 1. ' A detailed statement of proposed methodology. 2. A complete inventory list of all pre-1946 structures in the designated survey areas, listed by address, and including a rating and architectural style identification. b. 'Phase 2:,b,licitv- Recruitment and Twains of Volunteers The purpose of ;his phase is to gather and organize the survey resources - including volunteers, training materials and survey materials. 2.1 Thirtieth Street staff and our subconsultants will organize Wlunteer Tr,-dning Materials including style guides, sample completed State Inventory Forms and other .info;mational resources. EXHIBIT A 2.2 Thirtieth 'Street staff will "organize Field Research Materials including field checklist forms, State Inventory Forms and maps for each areas to be surveyed. If volunteers are available through the Historical Society, they will begin to photograph structures on the inventory list. 2.3 Thirtieth Street staff will organize the content of training sessions to include slides and discussions to attract the interest of volunteers and generate excitement about preservation. 2.4 Slides taken during Phase I will be made available to staff for their presentation to be given to the City Council on the objectives of the survey. 2.5 Project staff will conduct a training session as part of the "Survey Blitz" day designed to provide art intensive introduction to architectural styles as well. as familiarize volunteers with survey procedures. Later training sessions will emphasize records research methods, mapping, or other aspects of volunteer work. Products of this phase include: 1. Trvning Materials for each volunteer. 2. Field Research packets for each property or area to be surveyed. 3. Presentation materials for training sessiome and for the City Council. c. Fhs 3ivey_� h .. r�talation This `phase is the core of the study process and has as its objective the compilation of information as needed to complete the Historic Resources Inventory Forme to'be acceptable to the State Office of Historic preservation. We proporve to initiate the field work portion of the survey with a massive all-out effort - a "Survey Blitz" day -- using teams of volunteers per block and staff advisors. isle feel that this concentrated Approach can provide a sense of ccminity among the volunteers and generate enthusiasm and a network of support for their efforts. Review of the forms completed would be conducted by the project staff and could be followed up (if needed) by individual volunteer work as time permits, 3.1 Field work will be completes; by the volunteers an each structure to include photographhig the structure preparing a sketch map, completing a field inventory form describing the architectural design and details of the building and talking to neighbors to learn about the history of the house or building its owners and the area. Where possible photographs will be taken prior to the "Survey Blitz" day and will be included in the Field Research packet for each structure. 3.2 Project staff will review all field survey work and revise this work as necessary to insure ecoplet:eness and accuracy. EXHIBIT 'A 3.3 Research will be completed on each identified structure to include a review -of Sanborn Maps, local public records and city histories. The research will be -directed at ascertaining the year 'of construction, major modifications to the home and current and former owners. 3.4 General research will be conducted to identify sites of historic happenings, major events in the City's history, the role played by the City in regional or state history and, buildings, sites or objects which bear local historical significance' because of their connection to significant events or persons. This research can be part of an on--going process of historical research to be conducted by mcinbers of the Historical Society, study volunteers or stuciA..nts of the City's history. 3.5 The project consultants will meet with the City staff and the Historical Committee to review the results of the inventory and general research work periodically throughout the project as these are completed. 3.6 Each Inventory Form for "A" and "e" Rated structures will be completed including a UrM and Natiorvil Register designation number, assessor parcel numbers , use of glacene envelopes for photos, sketch maps, and other requirements in accordance with SHPO requirements. 3.7 Final review of the inventory materials and mapping will be conducted with the City staff and the Evaluation Committee to evaluate the consultants recommendations on which structures are recaszvnded as local landmarks, which structures may qualify for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and areas which may be considered as potential historic districts. The products of this phase include: 1. Completed State Historic Resources Inventory Fonns on each of the "A" and "e" Fated structures on the reconwnded inventory list , plus Inventory Forms including relevant information for the local or district designation of C-T ted structures. 2. Documented general research on the City's history and role in regional or State developim-nt. d. Phase 4: _PlX�tS?iL 111Y11ory r? �,r,a�+ts The purpose of this phase is to refine and coordinate documents prepared `during the study process to cohesive final product and to. prepare related documents or materials for public information. 4.1 An Historical Resource Inventory Report will be prepared which:. 1) Documents the nature and purpose of the study; 2) Describes the methodology used to conduct the survey, including both blank and'sample completed forms; If. EXHIBIT A } 3) Sumnarizes the volunteer involvenent and training 'process; 4) Includes copies of form and lists resources used; 5) Discusses the significant findings 'of both the specifiZ and general .. research of forts; 6) Identifies significant structures; and 7) Includes recommendations derived from 'the study to form a basis for the .rzeservation programs and future studies. These reommendations will include consideration of which key downtown buildings should be retained in place and which may be moved or partially retained. 4.2 Maps will be prepared which docent the location of surveyed structures and which identify any clusters of structures suitable as historic districts. .4.3 Thirtieth Street Architects Inc. will prepare the text and layout for a public relation:; brochure or booklet &!scribing the developrent of the City and highlighting the important survey findings. We recommend that our staff prepare illustrations for the document and have shown an estimated optional. cost for doing so. We are also -::apa•`:"e of completing the final editing and layout, if requested to do so. 4.4 Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. will review the products of the study with staff and Historical Committee. Minor chancel will be made as needed for clarity or to respond to loccal concerns. 4.5 The project manager will attend Planning Commission or City Council public hearings on the documents prepared, as requested to present the findings of the study. Two meetings or hearings are included in the project scope and fee. Additional meetings would be billed based on our standard hourly rates or subject to negotiations to adjust the overall scope of work to provide compensation. The products of this pease include: 1. Completed Historical Resource Inventory Report. 2. Mapping of survey results. 3. A public relations booklet text and layout. 44. 35 mn slide show for presentation of the study findings to the Planning Uwaission and City Council (optional) . a • ...wwa+.wskav EXHIBIT, B ' . ._ •�+' 'YP4'{fir +.: . e�. \ EMSTMO& SURM l/ ,�� `/.fir j� QEp" Product Estimated Pee four Services Delivery Dates and Costs' (months after start dmte) ' .1. %*th&logy mid 1 $105000100 Training Report 2. WindW.eld Survey 2 $2,000.00 Report `3. Inventory Status 4 $2,000.00 Report 4. Inventory Ccmpletion '.6 $3,000.00. '5. Inventory Report $3,000.00 6, Public Relations Bocklet .52,000.00 7. Project Completion $11r500.00 (10% of Fee) ZC7,`1�L: $151,000.00 Based on City's schedule of hearings.