HomeMy WebLinkAboutUnbudgeted Expenditures Approved by City Council for 1992 �fS
�
LAW OFFICE OF J
RICHARD J. SILBER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2134 MAIN STREET. SUITE 130
SEACLIFF OFFICE PARK
fV HUNT;NG70N BEACH. CA'LIFORNIA 92648
�
(714) 960-7646
L a` - FACSIMILE(714)960-7640 CIOU
LJ 3 Z
U L7 7�'3
--- February .14, 1992
Honorable Mayor Silva and
Members of the City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Post Office Box 2740
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92647
Re: George Eddy, Payment of Court Judgment
Dear Mayor Silva and Council Members:
This letter with attachments addresses E-11 on the Council
Agenda for 2/18/92. The City Attorney has recommended the Council
approve the payment of the Superior Court Judgment granting
Peremptory Writ of Mandate dated 9/23/91 awarding George Eddy "full
back pay and all entitled benefits from March 28, 1986 until April
18, 1990, " "reasonable attorney fees, " and "costs" as follows:
-Back pay and benefits $89,730.31
-Costs $ 271.70
-Reasonable Attorney $
-Fee per Government Code $ 7,500.00
Section 800
TOTAL: $97, 142. 01
Copies of the Statement of Decision, Writ of Mandate, and
Judgement Granting Peremptory Writ of Mandate in this matter are
attached as Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 respectively. It is Petitioners'
George Eddy and HBMEA's position that the recommended payment does
not satisfy the Subject Judgment.
"Fullback Pay And All Entitled Benefits
By letter dated December 6, 1991, William Osness, Personnel
Director, City of Huntington Beach, forwarded the City's
calculation of these wages and Benefits. (copy attached as
Exhibit 4) . By letter dated December 16, 1991 the City was
�a
s �
Honorable Mayor Silva and
Members of the City Council
Re: George Eddy, Payment of Court Judgment
February 14, 1992
Page Two
notified that our calculations (using their data) of "full back pay
and all entitled benefits" totalled $123,066. 31 (copy attached as
Exhibit 5) . By letter dated January 21, 1992 the City notified
that they would be taking a credit for Vocational Rehabilitation
maintenance benefits of $33 , 696. (copy of letter attached as
Exhibit 6) . Thus, the City's intention and recommendation to the
Council is to pay $89, 370. 31 as ($123 , 066. 31 - $33 , 696) "full back
pay and entitled benefits" . In our opinion, there is no legal
basis for this offset. By letter dated February 6, 1992 we
requested the legal authority on which this recommendation/decision
was based, but, as yet, that has not been forthcoming/provided.
(copy attached as Exhibit 7) . It will be our position that this
"offset" has no legal basis, and that the City has not complied
with the Judgment. Thus, we will seek an Order to show cause as
to why the City should not be held in contempt of Court for failure
to comply with the Peremptory Writ of Mandate ordering "full back
pay and all entitled benefits. "
It is unfortunate that this matter, which has been ongoing
since March, 1986 cannot be finally concluded without further
litigation. Although it is, and has been, our strong desire to
resolve this matter without further litigation, the current City
position precludes that. Again, if there is any legal
basis/authority for the City contention that an offset is
consistent with the Judgment, we would appreciate being informed
of such as requested in our February 6, 1992 letter, which provided
our local basis for the fees submitted. (See Exhibit 7) .
"Reasonable Attorney Fees"
Petitioner George Eddy requested that Court award attorney
fees under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021.5 (see
copy of Petition, page 18 Exhibit 7) . Based on this Petition,
Petitioner George Eddy received a Judgement whereby the Court
awarded "reasonable attorney fees" . (See Judgment - Exhibit 3) .
By letter dated January 9, 1992 the City was informed of the Court
costs and provided with an itemized statement of Attorney fees for
the Administrative and Court proceedings (copy attached as Exhibit
8) . The fees totalled $61, 200, and the computation was consistent
with the interpretation of California Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1021.5 and awards of attorney fees in similar matters.
Copies of relevant cases were forwarded to the City with our
February 6, 1992 letter outlining our position on this matter.
(Exhibit 7) .
i
Honorable Mayor Silva and
Members of the City Council
Re: George Eddy, Payment of Court Judgment
February 14, 1992
Page Three
We also agreed in our January 9, 1992 letter (Exhibit 9) to
compromise that sum total of Attorney fees and accept $45, 000 as
full payment of "reasonable attorney fees" if the issue could be
settled amicably by Stipulation, rather than the necessity of
further litigation (i.e. Motion for Attorney Fees) . However, the
City by its action/decision, as initially related to us in their
letter of January 21, 1992, to contend that Attorney fees are
governed by Government Code Section 8.00, which caps attorney fees
at $7,500, and requires us to further litigate the issues of
Attorney fees. The City Council should be aware that if we prevail
additional Attorney fees will be awarded for that time and effort;
and our Motion for Attorney fees will request and support the
entire sum of $61,500 for the litigation "effort" .
Again, we would prefer to amicably resolve this issue rather
than proceed with further litigation, but the City's current
position, which is without legal basis is preventing this.
Conclusion
This matter can be finally resolved by the City Council, by
approving payment of "full back pay and all entitled benefits" to
George Eddy in the sum of $123,066.31 which would satisfy the
Judgment. An alternative was offered to the City whereby the City
could "offset" any Workers' Compensation benefits (i.e. $33,696)
against Mr. Eddy's Permanent Disability Award, but the City has
chosen to disregard that acceptable alternative.
As for "reasonable attorney fees", $45, 000 is considered more
than reasonable for the time and effort expedited over the las 5
1/2 years in order to ultimately prevail in this action. Legal and
factual issues were exhaustively researched and over 100 pages of
legal documents were prepared. There were seven (7) days of
hearing- before the Court proceedings were even commenced. There
was an extensive amount of time and effort expended on this matter.
(see detailed statement - Exhibit 9) .
r `
Honorable Mayor Silva and
Members of the City Council
Re: George Eddy, Payment of Court Judgment
February 14, 1992
Page Four
Thus, finalization of this litigation can occur by the City
Council approving payment of the Judgment as follows by February
25, 1992:
"Full back pay and all entitled benefits" $123 , 066.31
"Reasonable Attorney Fees" (CCP 1021.5) $ 45, 000.00
"Costs" $ 271.70
TOTAL: $168, 338.01
We respectfully request your serious consideration of this
proposal.
Very truly yours,
}
RI D J. ER
RJS/jd
cc: George Eddy
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
William Osness, Personnel Director
Michael Uberaga, City Administrator
Attachments
Re: George Eddy v. City Of Huntington Beach
Case No. : 516078
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT 1 - STATEMENT OF DECISION
EXHIBIT 2 - WRIT OF MANDATE
EXHIBIT 3 - JUDGEMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE
EXHIBIT 4 - W. OSNESS 12/6/91 LETTER
EXHIBIT 5 - R.J. SILBER 12/16/91 LETTER RE: BACK PAY AND
BENEFIT CALCULATIONS
EXHIBIT 6 - J. BARRON 1/21/92 LETTER RE: CITY POSITION
EXHIBIT 7 - R.J. SILBER 2/6/92 LETTER RE: G. EDDY POSITION
EXHIBIT 8 - R.J. SILBER 1/9/92 LETTER RE: ATTORNEY FEES
(ITEMIZED STATEMENT)
I
j
1 LF. D
I
21
3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIIWIVAt;yilLE.Curly
4 ��pt!iY
_ '1 _--- ..'J U 1•i:_ v r ORANGE +:/
51
�4
+j =C.GE =DD_, and �:EA,i CASE NO. 516078
71� zn =.. Iolee Organization, }
STATEMENT OF DECIS-LON
=etir_�ners • : : ,. ,,.P. -�632)
nl
i)
10 1 Z OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) �
and its Personnel Commission, ) DEPT: 24
11 Respondent .
121
131
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
I
231
241
25
26
27 - 1 -
28
I
I
1 T '
2 COURT RULING/DEC_ION OF 6/26/. 1
3
Pursuant to the Writ of Mandate filed on September 21,
d 1990 , and with loving and opposing papers filed by Petitioners
51 and Respondent City of Huntington Beach, the matter was duly
it as :161_ . i -ter :oral argument
7i1 :resented on behaii of toth parties, the Court issued its
_:.^erS Writ cf
n=` .Tandat R, ind nwar^._::Q _rnrnny c _ecc =nd costs to
10i Petitioners . The Court determined that Petitioner Eddy was
i
11I =erminated on March 28 , 1986 , without being accorded his
121 procedural due process rights . Therefore, Petitioner is to be
13 reinstated to his employment with Respondent City with full
14 back pay and benefits from March 28, 1986 until April 18, 1990 .
15 Upon request of Respondent, the Court issues this Statement
i
16 of Decision, which has been appropriately reviewed and
17 commented upon by the parties , through their respective
I
18 attorneys .
19
20 II
21 STATEMENT OF DECISION
22 A. PETITIONERS' WORK HISTORY - WORK RELATED INJURY
231
1 Petitioner was employed by Respondent City of
241 Huntington Beach from March 1, 1982 until March 28 , 1986 I
25
termination. Petitioner was employed as a Maintenance Mechanic
26 "Water Systems Technician" . He incurred an industrial injury
27 to his left knee on June 22, 1982. Petitioner was placed on
28 full salary until he returned to light duty on June 29 , 1982.
- 2 -
i
i
1 From June 29 , 1982 until his termination on March 29 , 1986 , !'
2
Petitioner performed assigned work duties consistent with work i
3 limitations imposed by his treating physician, Dr. Robert A.
4 Cassidy, M.D. Petitioner was also disabled and off work on
511 various intermittent occasions because of his left knee and on `
c�r_ocs of disability,,
-
Pet t_o:+er -.,;asplaced ^n full salary and following each per
isah.__- oc_=_ed ::ut_r. -In September
nil _:au . :etizioner inaer.;ens ..nee surgery and was off work irn,n
10 Auust 30 , 1984 until December 19 , 1984, when he returned to
i1 modified duty. Except for one week, Petitioner worked i
121 continuously until March 28 , 1986 , when the city imposed a
13
medical disability termination.
14 2. Pursuant to medical evaluation requested by Respondent
15 City, on November 18 , 1985, Dr. Benjamin S. Rubin, M.D. , issued
16 a medical report that stated that the Petitioner is able to
17 perform most of his duties, with the exception of ,climbing
18 stairs and heavy lifting and that he felt Mr. Eddy should find
19 another line of work which precludes heavy lifting, squatting,
20 repeated stair climbing or ladder climbing, walking or uneven
21 ground or climbing hills .
22 3 . On February 5 , 1986, City Personel Director William
23 Osness scheduled a conference with Petitioner and his attorney,
241 apparently without informing him in advance as to its purpose.
25 During the meeting Mr. Osness advised: (1) That based upon
26 Dr. Rubin' s medical report, Petitioner was unable to perform
27 his full duties as a Maintenance Mechanic, and his condition
23 was permanent and stationary; (2) That the City Water
- 3 -
i
i
1 � Department needed a full time employee to perform the assigned ,
f i
21 work duties, so Petitioner could not continue employment, as �
assigned to his more limited duties; (3) That unless another
3 f
4 position within Petitioner ' s physical limitations is available,
51Petitioner 's employment would be severed within five weeks;
4
,; r4) _ a.- -as -1- - bl� for full salary becauz_31 -
7E ccrdit_;,r. .,as :ermanent and stationary; (5) That the City
III :as�:s� __ _�sume =~a ca__ ,~ai ?.ehabi:�_ation process ; and
arot ar zosition within
10 Petitioner ' s physical capabilities, but no available position
I
11 has been found; and (7) That Petitioner can be re-evaluated 'c_-
i
12! Dr. Cassidy, but a termination decision would be based upon Dr .
I
13 Rubin' s November 18, 1985 medical report.
14
15
B. PARTICIPATION BY PETITIONER IN VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION i
i
16 1. The Petitioner participated in Vocational
17 Rehabilitation, which was suspended because of Petitioner' s
i
18 pending knee injury.
I
19 2 . Petitioner ' s attorney requested that the City, in view
20 of Dr. Rubin' s recommendation seek alternative City employment
21
for Petitioner. City advised Vocational Rehabilitation }
22 counselor that no positions were available and he was informed
23 that Petitioner had five more weeks of employment. On
24 March 11, 1986 and March 17, 1986 , Mr. Osness informed {
i
25 Vocational Rehabilitation counselor VES that Petitioner' s last '
26 day of work would be March 28, 1986 . VES unsuccessfully sought
27 alternative City employment for Petitioner.
28
4 -
i
i
1 C. TERMINATION OF PETITIONER, EFFECTIVE WITHOUT ACCORDING
21 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS
3 1. Immediately after the February 5 , 1986 meeting, an
4 "Open Competitive Examination" was posted for. the "Water
Systems Tech I" position with a "Final Filing Date: March 7,
511
7j� 2 �n iiarc 1 , :936 , ?etitioner ' s attorney wrote Mr. i
' '
_ 30' meeting, alleging that
aeizher =at_zioner nor , s aoc;;rney had 'teen informed of its
10 Purpose; that Petitioner ' s termination violated City Personnel `
I1
Rules ; that Petitioner could only be terminated for cause; that
12 Petitioner was entitled to full salary accident leave and
13 Petitioner was entitled to complete Vocational Rehabilitation
14 before he was terminated.
15 3 . Petitioner was terminated on March 28, 1986 pursuant to
16 a draft letter dated March 4 , 1986 but not given Petitioner
17 until March 27, 1986. The action was preceded by a February 5,
18 1986 meeting with Petitioner ' s resumption of Vocational `
19 Rehabilitation on the same date. Petitioner was not accorded
20 procedural due process before his termination since Petitioner
21 did not receive in advance a notice of the proposed termination
22 action with supporting material and an opportunity to respond.
23 Petitioner then filed a grievance and the case worked its way
241 through the grievance procedure as set forth in the City of
25
Huntington Beach Personnel Rules .
26 4 . The grievance was appealed to the City Personnel
27 Commission and a hearing officer heard the appeal on behalf of
28 the City Personnel Commission. The case was bifurcated with
5 -
1I certain procedural issues, i .e. , procedural due process, to be
fI �
21 decided first .
3 5 . The matter was submitted on October 30, 1989 . On Marc! !
4 19, 1990, the Hearing Officer issued Findings and !
51 Recommendations relating to procedural due process; that the
et- - ^nr as �::r_r:�d _� ^__oed•µral -cue crocess safeguar�
71 before his 1--larch 23 , 1986 termination, but that Petitioner ' s
:-an :ar;r __ _136 and I*:e _ebruary 5 1966
nii "eetina r:Qnsrittite Aaarnnriai:e norice a ri _n opportunity- to
!
10 heard as due process requires .
11
6 . On April 18, 1990 the Personnel Commission adopted the �
121 Hearing Officer ' s report findings that Petitioner' s due process
13
` rights were not violated during the termination procedure. i
14 7• On June 26, 1990, Respondent City advised Petitioner of
15 its decision and the right to seek judicial review_ pursuant to
16 C.C.P. §1094 . 6 and this Petition for Writ of Mandate was timely
17 filed on September 21, 1990 .
18
8 . The discipline discharge imposed without according
19 procedural due process is invalid and the employee is entitled
to damages in the form of back pay until due process provided
20 1
21 from the time until the discipline is imposed until the
22 administrator review process is completed and discipline has
23
become final . Since Petitioner' s termination was held invalid
24 and a constitutional infirmity was not corrected until the
25 Personnel Commission adopted the Hearing Officer' s findings on
26 April 19 , 1990, the Petitioner is entitled to awarded back pay
27 from the date of his termination until the Personnel Commission
28 filed its decision on April 18 , 1990.
6 -
1 � 0. T_SSUANCE OF WRIT OF MANDATE AND AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES
21 COSTS.
3 1. The Court has concluded that Petitioner was not t
4 accorded his procedural due process safeguards before his
5 termination, since he did not receive in advance, notice of the +
respond and the
71I nsti::stional in`=,it1 was not corrected until the Personnel
311 _:,.•. :���_�:z =_'_ad _ :=_cision on April 13 , 1-990 . Therefore,
nil will, _ssue a :eremar.ory Writ of Mandate ordering
10l Respondent to set aside the decision of the Personnel
11 Commission and Findings and Recommendations of the Hearing i
12 Officer which determine that: (a) the Respondent City did not
13
violate the procedural due process rights of Petitioner during
14 the termination process; (b) determine if Petitioner was
15 terminated from his employment without according him procedural
16 due process safeguards; (c) direct Respondent City to reinstate
17 Petitioner to his employment with Respondent City as a
18 Maintenance Mechanic Water Systems Tech with full back pay and
19 all benefits from March 28, 1986 until April 18, 1990 . The
20 Court, in this case, while not specifically finding that the
21 Skell doctrine applies to non-disciplinary terminations does
22 find that the spirit of Skelly. and basic procedural due process
23 were not followed in this case. The Court will award the
I
24 Petitioner reasonable attorney' s fees .
25
26
27
28
7 -
I
1 The Petitioner will file an appropriate motion or
i
2 stipulation of the parties as of the basis and amount of
3 requested fees and finally, the Petitioner will recover his !
4 costs in this suit. l
5 GnEEF N- 7.7;;C;3D
.'A T_r 1. : REFFRFF
;r
judge Greer H. Stroud
711
.3 I
all
10
I
11
i
12
i
13 j
r
14
i
15
I
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 — a -
28
1 FILED
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFO I
2 ..�1 ,�7 1991
3 FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE /� .
CAtt� r. 1r:YN���{V�M.J4L.•it
4 By DEPUTY
5
6 GF.ORGE EODY, and HBMEA, ; CASE NO. 516078
an Employee Organization, ) j
71 ) WRIT OF MANDATE
Petitioners , ) (C.C.P. §632)
i �s .
9 ) ;
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
10 and its Personnel Commission, ) DEPT: 24
11 Respondent. )
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 1. Petitioner was not accorded his procedural due process
2 rights before his termination, since Petitioner did not receive
3 in advance a notice of the proposed termination action, with
4 supporting material, with an opportunity to respond, and the
5 constitutional infirmity was not corrected until the City
6 Personnel Commission filed its Decision on April 18, 1990 .
7 Therefore, the Court issues a Peremptory Writ of Mandate under
8 seal of this Court ordering Respondent City of Huntington Beach j
I
9 and its Personnel Commission upon receipt of this Writ:
10 a . To set aside the decision of the Personnel
11 Commission and findings/recommendations of the Hearing officer
12 which determined that Respondent City did not violate the
13 Procedural due process rights of Petitioner during the
14 termination process.
15 b. To determine that Petitioner was terminated from
16 his employment on March 28, 1986, without according him his
17 procedural due process rights .
18 C. To direct Respondent City to reinstate Petitioner
19 to his employment with Respondent City as a "Maintenance
20 Mechanic/Water Systems Technician" with full back pay and all
21 entitled benefit from March 28 , 1986 until April 18, 1990 .
22 2 . The Court awards Petitioners reasonable attorney
23 fees . Petitioner is to file an appropriate motion or
24 stipulation of the parties as to the basis and amount of
25 requested fees .
26
27
28 //// - 2 -
1 3 . Petitioners to recover their costs in this suit.
s
2 4 . It i requested that this Honorable Court issue a I
3 judgment which is consistent with the Statement of Decision and
4 writ of Mandate submitted by Respondent City.
5
6 SEP i 7 1991 !-A H. STROUD
DATED:
i
Judge Greer H. Stroud
81 !
9'
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1?
18
19
20
21
22
I
231
24
25
26
27 - 3 `
28
1
F I L E D
S F P 2 3 tit
CARY L.CR;��NVILE.l;cwry C!erk
By CUM
1..
SUPERIOR COURT OF "'FiE STATE OF CAIIFORNIA
an =mn_cvee Oraanizat,zn
_ JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY
etitioners. ;r—tel+ OF MANDATE
:0 )
VS. )
CITY OF h'UNTINGTON BEACH )
12 : and its Personnel )
Commission } DEPT: 24
3 : Respondent. )
4 :
1?
_8
=0
411 ..
1
LO '
G
I 1. Petitioner was not accorded his "procedural due
2 . process safeguards" before his termination, since Petitioner did:
3 not receive in advance a notice of the proposed termination action,
.i.• with supporting material, :.ith an opportunity to respond: and the
constitutional infi=ity was not corrected until the City Personnel.
_==issic:. _:arefore, the Cz, _
ill _ssue a Peremmtory r__ =f :.andate under seal of this Court
?eac: and _-s :ersonne_
:Q a. To set aside the decision of the Personnel Commission and.
.I findings/recommendations of the nearing officer which determined!
.7 . that Respondent City did not 7ioiate the procedural due process
13 -: rights of Petitioner during the termination process.
4 • b. To determine that Petitioner was terminated from his;
employment on 3/28/86 wit.hcut according him his procedural due!
i6 process safeguards.
i7 ' C. To direct Respondent City to reinstate Petition to his:
13". employment with Respondent City as a "Maintenance Mechanic/Water-
Systems technician" with full back pay and all entitled benefits.
from Marc!i 28 , 1986 until April 18, 1990.
2. The Court awards Petitioners reasonable attorney fees.
22': . Petitioners are to file an appropriate motion or stipulation of the!
_3 parties as to the basis and amount of requested fees.
24 Psti.tioners to recover their costs in this -suit.
�c
ADATED: c / GREER H. STROUD
c? " Judge Gr troud
23
2
r�
•,, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT
536-5492
December 6, 1991
Richard J. Silber, Esq. , Attorney
2134 Main Street Suite 130
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE: GEORGE EDDY
Dear Mr. Silber:
1 . Wages: $113,468.00 (see attached)
2. Vacation Pay: $8,193.37
5.2308 x 137 1/2 - 551 x $14.87
3. Health Insurance: Health Net - family
1986 $240.22
1987 240.22
1988 272.51
'1989 277.34
1990 349.41
4. Sick Leave:
a. Zero hours as of 3/28/86
c. 389.4 hours
S. PERS: 7% of salary
Sincerely,
William H. Osness
Personnel Director
WHO:bpo
Attachments
WPPERSP:277
ri d
LAW OFFICE OF
RICHARD J. SILBER
a MoRlsgft".COMOw�7fON
2134 MAIN STREET. SUITE 130
SEACLIFF OFFICE PARK
NUNTINGTON BEACH.CAUFORNIA 92648
(714) 960-76"
FACSIMILE(714)960-7640
December 16, 1991
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX 2740, 2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92647
William H. Osness, Personnel Director
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX 2740, 2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92647
Re: George Eddy v. City of Huntington Beach
Case No. : 516078
PAYMENT OF BACK PAY BENEFITS (3/28/86-4/18/90)
Gentlepersons:
Thank you for your letter dated 12/6/91. Pursuant to the Writ of
Mandate/Court Judgment, issued 9/17/91 (not appealed) , and
consistent with the Court Judgment/Writ of Mandate of reinstatement
as a "Maintenance Mechanic/Water Systems Technician" with full back
pay and all. entitled benefits from March 28, 1986 until April 18,
1990, it is requested that the City immediately issue payment to
satisfy such Court Judgment as follows:
DESCRIPTION � +
A. Full Back Pay
1. Wages $113 ,468.00
2. PERS Contribution:
(a) Employer contribution Full amount
(b) Employee PERS contribution 7% of salary
to be paid by the City
3 . Vacation Pay $8,193.37
5.2308 hrs. x 26 pay periods
per year x 4 years (plus 7 hrs)
551 total hours x $14 .87
TOTAL: $121,661.37
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
William H. Osness, Personnel Director
Re: George Eddy v. City of Huntington Beach
December 16, 1991
Paqe Two
4. Interim less earnings during period
period of reinstatement
1989 -
Eddy Industrial
$11, 430,00
Newport Landing
$4,463.00
Total (1989) $15,893.00
1990
Newport Landing (1990) $4,266.00
$20,159.00
TOTAL NET WAGES PLUS EMPLOYER
AND EMPLOYEE 7% PERS CONTRIBUTION: $101,502.37
($121,661.37 - $20, 159.00)
B. BENEFITS
1. HEALTH INSURANCE: HEALTH NET - FAMILY
YEAR MONTHLY PREMIUM AMOUNT
1986 $240.22 X 9: $2,161.98
1987 $240.22 X 12: $2,882.64
1988 $272. 51 X 12: $3,270.12
1989 $277 .34 X 12: $3 ,328.08
1990 $349. 41 X 4: $1,397. 64
$13 ,040.46
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
William H. Osness, Personnel Director
Re: George Eddy v. City of Huntinaton Beach
December 16, 1991
Page Three
Mr. Eddy either maintained Health-Net insurance through the City
to 11/1/89, or through wife/Carol Eddy at Fountain Valley Hospital.
Therefore the full amount must be reimbursed to him.
2. Sick Leave Benefits
a. Accrued benefits as of 3/28/86: 183.8 hrs.
(See attached 4/4/86 termination check)
b. Accrued hours for period of termination 389.4 hrs.
TOTAL: 573.2 hrs.
$8,523.48
573.2 x $14.87:
Pursuant to the MEA MOU, Art. 5 Sec. F the City Personnel
Rules, Sec. 18-8/9/90, and State Law [Gov. Code. Sec. 21025.2;
Mahler v. City of Buena Park, Cal. App. 3d , 91 D.A.R. 15001
(12/6/91) , Mr. Eddy has an absolute right to utilize all of his
sick leave benefits before any retirement becomes effective.
Therefore, the City must provide 573.2 hrs. of sick leave x $14.87,
effective 4/19/90. The entire amount was due and payable 5/14/90.
Total Benefits: $21,563.94
($13 , 040. 46 + $8, 523.48)
Total Wages and Benefits:
$101,502.37/wages plus $21,563.94/benefits) $123 ,066.31
On behalf of our client Mr. George Eddy it is requested that
the City issue its check to our client, in the following manner no
later than 12/20/91 (Please note that the COURT JUDGMENT was
enforceable 12/2/91) :
a. That the City not take any tax deductions from wages
payments to Mr. Eddy, but issue him a 1099 for sums that are deemed
to be taxable (does not include health insurance reimbursement) ;
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
William H. Osness, Personnel Director
Re: Georae Eddy v. City of Huntington Beach
December 16, 1991
Page four
b. That the City -pay Employer/Employee PERS contributions,
and cause Mr. Eddy to be reinstated in PERS.
C. That pursuant to the attached authorization, Mr. Eddy's
check be hand-delivered to me for payment to Mr. Eddy.
Thank you for your anticipated immediate attention and
cooperation.
Sincerely,
I.IG/1 I�l
RICHARD J. ILBER
RJS/j d
cc: HBMEA
George Eddy
Enclosures: (1) W-2 and Wage statements
(1989 and 1990)
(2) Personnel Rule
18-8/9/10
(3) Eddy 'f inal pay check
(18.38 sick leave hrs.)
(Griev. Exh. 36)
(4) R. Silber 10/29/91 letter
(5) W. Osness 12/6/91 letter
(6) Mahler v. Buena Park Decision
91 D.A.R. 15001 (12/6/91)
vRIV C. f
;..- P.O.EOX V40
2000 UNU STREET
NUWnmGTON BEACH
CAUFORN1A 62447
GAIL NUMN TEL.EtHONE
City I►tta�+Ntr (71416364M
FM 7W 3 .No
January 21, 1992
Richard J. Silber, Esq.
2134 Main Street, Suite 130
Seacliff Office Park
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Re: Georce Eddy v. City of Huntington Reach
OCSC Case No. 516078
Payment of Hack Payments
(March 28, 1986 to April 18, 1990)
Dear Rich:
Sorry it has taken so long to get back to you. The position of
the City is that vocational rehabilitation maintenance benefits
are a set-of f against back pay. VRPT benefits would not have
been paid concurrently with U v full -salary. We, therefore,
are entitled to a credit in the amount of $33,696.00 from his
award.
The City also maintains that attorneys fees are governed by
Government Code Section 800 in view of the case result,
regardless of how they were pled in the petition.
Very truly yours,
1
J EPH C. BARRON
D uty City Attorney
- Petition Wilkerson
Page 18 Iijab 9'l
a.r�
LAW OFFICE OF
RICHARD j. SiL SER
I a C-ESS:ONi ,=*-004T.ON
2!?4 MAIN STREET. SJITE'30
4UNT*NG70'. 3E.AC: =-�.FORNiA 92648
:7141 960-7646
FACSIMILE(714)960-7640
February 6 , 1992
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
City of Huntington Beach
P.O.' BOX 2740, 2000 Main' Street
Huntington Beach, California 92647
William H. Osness, Personnel Director
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX 2740, 2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92647
Re: - Georae Eddy v. City of Huntington Beach
Case No. : 516078
PAYMENT OF BACK PAY AND BENEFITS (3/28/86-4/18/90)
Gentlepersons:
In response to the City Attorney's office letter dated January 21,
1992 (received on January 29, 1992) , please be advised as follows:
1. As we discussed on January 29, 1992 , our office had
intended to move Ex Parte on Friday, January 31, 1992 for an Order
to Show Cause re Contempt under CCP Section 1097 (Failure to Comply
with Peremptory Writ) . However, based upon our discussions and Mr.
Barron's assurance that on February 18, 1992 the City Council will
adopt a Resolution to provide "back pay and benefits" to comply
with the Writ of Mandate/Judgment in this matter; and that payment
would be forthcoming within 7 days (i.e. by February 25, 1992) , we
did not proceed on that action.
2 . We are however dismayed that the City without the benefit
of a Court Order or Judicial precedent will set-off Workers '
Compensation VRTD Benefits against the Judgment/Writ of Mandate to
provide Mr. Eddy "with full back' pay and all entitled benefits".
3 . We also do not understand the City's contention that
Attorney's fees are to be governed by Gov. Code Sec. 800, rather
than CCP 1021. 5, "substantial benefit concept" and "Private
Attorney General Doctrine" , as alleged in . the Petition and
determined by the Court.
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
William H. Osness, Personnel Director
Re: George Eddy v. City of Huntington Beach
February 6, 1992
Page Two
4. In view of these unfounded assertions by the City, it will
unfortunately be necessary to pursue further litigation on these
issues, to compel the City to fully comply with the Court
Order/Writ of Mandate, to provide "full back pay and benefits", and
"reasonable attorney fees" under CCP 1021.5.
Therefore, please be advised that our position on these issues is
as follows:
A. Reinstatement With "Full Back Pay and Benefits - No Offset Of
VRTD Benefits" .
The Statement of Decision, writ of Mandate and Judgment refer to
"full bagk pay and all entitled benefits from March 28 . 1986 until
April 18 . 1990. " There is ,no reference to any offset/credit.
Respondent City prepared these documents for the Court's approval.
Thus, any ambiguities, of which we do not think there are any,
would be resolved in favor of Petitioners. The Petition and the
entire Administrative/Court record are clear that Petitioner was
pursuing Vocational Rehabilitation and receiving Workers'
Compensation benefits during this time. There was never anv
argument that Petitioner should have those benefits off-set, should
he prevail. We have offered alternatives to the City, including
converting the VRTD benefits payments- to Permanent Disability
advances. However, the City must provide "full back pay and
benefits" as determined by the Court in the Judgment/Writ of
Mandate, and Statement of Decision.
While Judicial Doctrine does provide for an offset for "interim
earnings" , we are not aware of any legal authority to "offset"
Workers' Compensation benefits. These benefits/issues are
determined by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, which has
"exclusive jurisdiction" to determine all issues concerning
Workers' Compensation Benefits, including Temporary Disability
Benefits and VRTD Benefits under Labor Code Section 139.5. If the
City believes that it is pursuing this "Off-Set Action" pursuant
to legal authority, it is requested that our office be immediately
advised accordingly.
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
William H. Osness, Personnel Director
Re: GeorcTe Eddy v. City of Huntinciton Beach
February 6, 1992
Page Three
B. Award Of Attorney Fees Pursuant To C.C.P. Section 1021.5
"Substantial Benefits Conceot" and "Private Attorney General
Doctrine" .
Petitioners ' Pleadings and Prayer sought Attorney' s fees under
California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021. 5 . (see attached
pages 18 , 19) . The Judgment and Writ awarded Petitioners ' Attorney
Fees based on the Petition, and under that theory. Although
Respondent in its Opposition papers asserted that Attorney Fees
should be denied to Petitioners, Respondent City did not prevail
Furthermore, Respondent City did not plead in the alternative that
if Petitioners prevailed on the "Attorney Fees" issue, and was
awarded fees, Petitioners should be awarded such fees in accordance
with Government Code Section 800. Respondent City reserved the
right to assert additional defenses in its Answer of February 12,
1991. However, no additional defenses were asserted. Therefore
it is submitted that Respondent City is acting without any basis
and in "very bad faith" to raise this contention at this time,
following the issuance of the Court's Writ of Mandate/Judgment
(which was prepared by Respondent City) . Moreover, if the City
has any legal authority for asserting this position (Post-
Judgment) , it is requested that our office be advised accordingly.
In support of Petitioners position that CCP Section 1021.5 is
applicable (as determined by the Court pursuant to Petitioners'
Petition) we attach the Court Decisions of Wilkerson v. City of
Placentia, 118 Cal.App.3d 435 (4/7/81) and Jabole v. Pasadena
Development Agency, 125 Cal .App.3d 931 (2/10/82) . (See also
Burkholder v. Kizer, decision concerning CCP 1021.5 factors, and
administrative hearing fees) .
C. CONCLUSION
As we have always indicated, we desire to conclude this matter at
this time without the need of further litigation. If that is not
Possible, in view of the Cit ' s position concerning the payment of
"back pay and benefits" to Petitioner George Eddy as well as
Attorneys Fees, we assume that the City Council on February 18,
1992 will take appropriate action, so that Petitioner and our
office will immediately receive all funds that are not in dispute
at this time. Following the City Council action, our office will
then proceed with appropriate Court action to seek full compliance
with the Court Judgment/Writ of Mandate regarding "back pay and
benefits, " and "Attorney fees" issues unresolved.
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
William H. Osness, Personnel Director
Re: George Eddy v. City of Huntington Beach
February 6, 1992
Page Four
Thank you for your continuing courtesy and cooperation in this
matter.
Sincerely,
&HARD J. :3ILBER
r
RJS/jd
cc: HBMEA
George Eddy
Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
"FricE or
CITY ATTORNEY
v
P.O.SOX 2740
2000 MAIN STREET
HUNTINGTON BEACH
CALIFORNIA E2647
GAIL BUTTON TELErMONE
City Attorney (7141 63iA666
January 21, 1992
Richard J. Silber, Esq.
2134 Main Street, Suite 130
Seacliff Office Park
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Re: George Eddy v. City of Huntington Beach
OCSC Case No. 516078
Payment of Back Payments ,
(March 28, 1986 to April 18, 1990)
Dear Rich:
Sorry it has taken so long to get back to you. The position of
the City is that vocational rehabilitation maintenance benefits
are a set-off against back pay. VRDT benefits would not have
been paid concurrently with his full salary. We, therefore,
are entitled to a credit in the amount of $33,696 .00 from his
award.
The City also maintains that attorneys fees are governed by
Government Code Section 800 in view of the case result,
regardless of how they were pled in the petition.
Very truly yours,
I
JO EPH C. BARRON
D uty City Attorney
i
1 authority initially imposing discipline (Skelly v. State
2 Personnel Board (1975, 15 Cal. 3d 311, 124 Cal Rptr. 475)
3 30. Petitioner has exhausted the available remedies
4� required to be pursued by him; Petitioner does not have a plain,
51 speedy, and adequate remedy in the course of law.
61 31. a. As a result of Respondent's acts referred to above,
7..; Petitioner has been required to employ legal counsel. The full
81 amount of said attorney fees is not known to Petitioner, and
91 Petitioner will state such amounts when the same becomes know to
10i him and will submit proof thereof.
111 b. Petitioner should be awarded attorney fees under
121 California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021.5 under y
�m 131 "substantial benefit concepts" and "Private Attorney General
14i Doctrine", since a favorable decision will clarify and expand
s� 15i existing law and will have an impact on virtually all employees
S2 16
� in the public sector. [Serrano vs. Priest, 120 Cal 3d 25 (1977) ;
17f Wilkerson vs. City of Placentia, 118 Cal.App. 3d 435 (7/7/80) ] .
181 WHEREFORE, PETITIONER PRAYS THAT:
19l 1. A Peremptory Writ of Mandate be issued ordering
I
201 Respondent:
i
21 ! a. To set aside the decision of the Personnel
22!� Commission and findings recommendations of the Hearing Officer
23
which determined that Respondent City did not violate the
i
24i procedural due process rights of Petitioner during the
25 ! termination process. 1
11
261 b. To determine that Petitioner was terminated from
I
27 :
28111 18
i
(
1 ; his employment on 3/28/86 without according him his Skelly
I
2 "Procedural Due Process Safeguards"
3, c. To direct Respondent City to reinstate Petition to
41 his employment with Respondent City as a "Maintenance
6 ' Mechanic/Water Systems Technician" with full back pay and all
I
61 entitled benefit from 3/28/86 until 4/18/90.
71 1. Petitioner be awarded attorney fees pursuant to
8; California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1021.5 under
i
9! "substantial benefit concepts" and "Private Attorney General
10I Doctrine".
11 2. Petitioner recover his costs in this suit.
12 3. Petitioner be granted such other relive as the Court mayj
m
deem appropriate.
13
,.j
�5 14
DATED: September 21, 1990 LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD J. SILBER
;< 15 A Professional Corporation
U 16 .
RE
17 RlpfAAD JOr
ILBER
Attorney IPetitioner,
18 George Eddy and HBMEA
191
201
i
211
22!
231
2C
25 !
i
I
27 ' I
19 I
28 Il
!� i
LAW OFFICE OF
RICHARD J. SILBER
a.�reSSlOhK CG�Mw.nON
?RAIN S"Err.
__4CL:Fr09'CE PARK
evVr\GrON 3EACr --A::FORNIA 92648
'7t41 960.7646
==CSIMILE(7141 960.7640
January 9, 1992
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX 2740, 2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92647
William H. Osness, Personnel Director
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX 2740, 2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92647
Re: George Eddy v. City of Huntington Beach
Case No. : 516078
AWARD OF COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES
Gentlepersons:
A. JUDGEMENT - BACK-PAY AWARD
The Writ of Mandate/Court Judgment was issued on 9/17/91, so
the City was obligated to comply with the Judgment and provide full
back pay and benefits to George Eddy, no later than 11/17/91 (60
days after Judgment) . Pursuant to letter dated 10/29/91 I
requested a computation of Mr. Eddy's back pay and benefits for the
period of 3/28/86 until 4/18/90 (letter received 12/6/91) ; and on
12/16/91, I submitted an itemized Back Pay and Benefits Statement
in the amount of $123 , 066.37 to the City for prompt payment. Even
though there has been an outstanding Court judgment since 9/17/91,
I have been informed that the City council must approve payment of
this Judgment/Writ of Mandate. Therefore, immediate action by the
Council and payment by the City is requested. Please note that
interest (at 10%) has been accruing since 9/17/91.
B. JUDGMINT-COURT COST AND ATTORNEY FEES
1 . The Court awarded Court Costs to Petitioners. An itemized
statement of such costs is attached in the amount of $271.70.
Immediate action and payment is requested.
Joe Barron, Deputy City Attorney
William H. Osness, Personnel Director
Re: George Eddy v City of Huntington Beach
January 9, 1992
Page Two
2. The Court awarded Petitioners ' "reasonable attorney fees",
the amount of such fees is to be determined pursuant to appropriate
motion or stipulation of the parties.
I enclose an Itemized Statement of Attorney Fees for the
administrative and Court proceedings. No fees have been.paid; and
all fees can be substantiated by time slips. The total fees at a
. $200/hour rate is equal to $61, 200 (no "lode star adjustment") .
If the City will agree to immediate approval and payment, I will
accept the sum of $45, 000 as "reasonable attorney fees". If it is
necessary that I file a Motion with the Court, I will seek payment
of the full amount of $61,200, plus fees for processing the Motion.
Please immediately advise - if approval and payment will be
forthcoming.
Thank you for your anticipated immediate attention and
cooperation.
Sincerely
P,
RICHARD 0'� SILBER
RJS/jd
cc: George Eddy
Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
Enclosures:
_AW OFFICE 09
RICHARD J. SILBER
aaCarSS'CNAL CCOm004 ON
_ '1 ?dAIN STREr. D�:ITC�30
S3ACr. O=L.FORNIA 92648
:7141 960-76 46
FACSIMILE(71s)960-7640
January 9, 1992
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
POST OFFICE BOX 2740, 2000 MAIN STREET
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92647
RE: HBMEA, GEORGE EDDY V. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CASE NO. : 516078
STATEMENT
PREVIOUS BALANCE: $-0-
COST AND EXPENSES (attached) : $271.70
FEE FOR LEGAL SERVICES (attached) : $61,200.00
PAYMENTS RECEIVED: $-0-
TOTAL DUE:, $45.000*
TRUST ACCOUNT
PREVIOUS BALANCE: $
DEPOSITS: $
DISBURSEMENTS: $
CURRENT BALANCE IN TRUST 'ACCOUNT: $
*As "Special" "Reasonable Attorney Fee" if amount is immediately
paid and approved, without the necessity of filing a court motion.
HBMEA/GEORGE EDDY V. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CASE NO. 516078
January 8, 1992
Page one
STATEMENT OF LEGAL SERVICES
DATE DESCRIPTION _TIM
I . TERMINATION OF GRIEVANT; DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS
2/5/86 Meeting with Pers. Director 2 .5
- Notice of Proposed Termination
(no "due process")
3/4/86 Letter to City 1.5
3/27/86 Review of 3/4/86 "Draft" 1.5
- Termination letter; discussion
with Grievant (no "due process")
3/27/86 Letter to City re: Termination 1.0
of Eddy
4/4/86 Preparation of Grievance .5
5/14/86 Letter to City Attorney .5
Re: Response to 4/23/86
letter
5/14/86 Letter to City Re: Payment .5
of R-18-16 Leave
6/11/-6/12/86 Assemblage of documents 3 .0
for 4th step Grievance Hrg.
I. TOTAL 11.0
DATE DESCRIPTION TIME'
II. Administrative Hearings - City Personnel Board
6/13/86 4th Step Grievance Hearing - 6.5
R. Bernard, Asst. City
Admin./Hearing Officer
5TH Steo Hearing = Indep. Hrcr.
Officer - L. Zicman, Esa.
1/16/87 Hearing I 7.5
3/4/87 Hearing II 7 .5
HBMEA/GEORGE EDDY V. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CASE NO. 516078
January 8, 1992
Page two
DATE DESCRIPTION
5/15/87 Hearing III 7.5
5/27/87 Hearing IV 7.5
5/28/87 Hearing V 7. 5
5/29/87 Hearing VI 7.5
6/19/87 Hearing VII 7 .5
1/10/87 - Preparation time for 49.0
6/18/87 Hearings, including legal
(various) research;
Preparation of Jt. 6.0
Exhibits - (work. comp, voc.
rehab. , medical files)
II. TOTAL: 107.50
III. POST - HEARING BRIEFS - ADMIN. HRGS.
12/9/88 Post Hearing Brief, (93pp) 45.0
incl. legal research
7/03/89 Reply Brief, 16 pp. , incl. '25.0
legal research
9/16/89 Suppl . Post-Termination. Hrg. 12.0
Brief, 10 pp, incl. legal research
(McGraw v. City of H. Beach,
and related cases)
III. TOTAL: 82 .0
Total: 200.50
(I . Termination, II. Admin.
Hearings and III. Briefs)
HBXEA/GEORGE EDDY V. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CASE NO. 516078
January 8, 1992
Page three
DATE DESCRIPTION TIME
IV. Writ of Mandate Proceedings
PREPARATION OF COURT DOCUMENTS ; COURT-HEARING
PETITIONER S DOCUMENTS
9/21/90 Petition for Writ of Mandate, . 20. 0
Appendix 1 (19pp)
1/7/91 Notice of Hearing of Application 1. 0
for Peremptory Writ of Mandate
5/21/91
1/7/91 Points and Authorities in support 38 .0
of Petition for Writ of Mandate
1/7/91 Stipulation Re: Filing of Amended/ .5
Operative Pleadings
6/18/91 Reply Points and Authorities in 20.0
Support of Petition for Writ of
Mandate
6/18/91 Lodging of Administrative Record 2.5
Re: "Due Process" Issue -
Personnel Commission
6/18/91 Meet & Confer Rule Local 504 .5
6/26/91 Court Hearing 3 .5
6/24-6/25/91 Preparation for Hearing 4.0
90.0
RESPONDENT'S DOCUMENTS (REVIEW)
2/12/91 Answer to Petition for Writ 1.0
of Mandamus
2/12/91 Points and Authorities 4.5
in Opposition to Petition
5 .5
HBMEA/GEORGE EDDY V. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CASE NO. 516078
January 8, 1992
Page four
DATE DESCRIPTION TIME
POST HEARING DOCUMENTS (PREPARATION)
Petitioners ' Documents (Preparation)
8/26/91 Notice of Intent to file . 5
documents
8/26/91 Proposed Statement of Decision 3 . 0
8/26/91 Proposed Judgment granting Writ 2 .5
of Mandate
8/26/91 Proposed Writ of Mandate .5
REVIEW OF RESPONDENTS RESPONDENTS' DOCUMENTS
8/29/91 Proposed Statement of Decision 1. 0
8/29/91 Writ of Mandate
Proposed Judgment Respondent
Request that Judgment
conform to Writ of Mandate
that is issued
10/29/91 Letter to City Re: Back pay & 1.5
wage computation
12/16/91 Letter to City Re: payment of 1.5
back pay & benefits
10.0 hrs.
TOTAL: (WRIT OF MANDATE PROCEEDINGS) : 105.50hrs.
TOTAL: ADMINISTRATIVE AND COURT PROCEEDINGS 306.Ohrs.
306 hrs. X $200/hr = $61,200.00
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date December 21, 1992
Submitted to: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY CrECTIONS
APPROVED BY CITY C0UW,l..
Submitted by: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrat .-- �
Prepared by: RONALD E. LOWENBERG, Chief of Police47aT�..
_ CI�Y CIS1sRK
Subject: TRANSFER OF STANDARDS AND TRAINING FSTC) FUNDS
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments we,.?
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The police department is requesting the transfer of California State STC Grant funds
in order to meet state-mandated training for detention officers.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize, in consultation with and approval of the City Administrator, the transfer
of the 1992-1993 STC Grant funds ($8,288) from the General Fund to the Jail Training
Account (E-AA-PD-334-540-00) .
ANALYSIS
Based upon training plans submitted to and approved by the California State Board of
Corrections, each fiscal year the City of Huntington Beach receives into the General
Fund STC Grant funds. The purpose of these funds is to financially assist the city in
providing state-mandated training for detention officers.
FUNDING SOURCE
Funds received from the State of California pursuant to California Penal Code Section
6040 (Standards and Training for Corrections Program).
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Disapprove transfer and lose state funds for training of detention officers.
ATTACHMENTS
1. 1992-1993 STC Approved Training Plan
2. City Ordinance No. 2689
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PETE WILSON, GOVERNOR HUNTINGTON BEACKPOLICE
DE COg9� OFF-1cr V THE CHIEF
h
M
A
O
T RONALD E. LOWENBERG July 13, 1992
v CHIEF OF POLICE
2000 MAIN STREET
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648
a
Annual Training Plan Approval: Huntington Beach Police Department
a
Pursuant to Title 15, Division 1, Chapter 1, Subchapter 1, Article 7,
a Section 297 , California Code of Regulations , your department's Annual
a Training Plan for Fiscal Year 1992-1993 is approved.
U
o The plan approval authorizes expenditures for training effective
z July 1, 1992. The total allotment based on 19 positions , which
W
a includes 1 entry-level staff , is $8,288.00.
U
In accordance with the regulations, if the number of eligible positions
m or the actual staff trained in the core category are less than
> projected in your Annual Training Plan, funds allotted to those
c positions are to be returned to the Corrections Training Fund at the
end of the fiscal year.
U
m In accordance with your request , funds will be disbursed for deposit
8 in the City's designated account for the Standards and Training for
`0 Corrections (STC) Program as follows:
N Approved
ZO 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total
U $2,125.00 $2,125.00 $2,338.00 $1,700.00 $8,288.00
W
VThe State Controller has been notified regarding the approval for
U. disbursement of funds. The funds are to be sent to:
O
DAN VILLELLA
Q DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
m 2000 MAIN STREET
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648
a
z
0 Should you have any questions , please feel free to contact your
Qassigned Field Representative, Ron C. Jenkins.
V
Sincerely,
erson
D puty Director
cc: DAN VILLELLA
soc 109
Revised 7/01/92
Standards and Training for Corrections Program
H
Annual Training Plan Application
FACE SHEET
1. County: 59 Orange
2. Department: 182 Police Department
3. Person Preparing Report: 4. Financial Officer:
GARY MEZA ROBERT SEDLAK
TRAINING SERGEANT PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT
(714) 5365629 (714) 5365907
. 2000 MAIN STREET 2000 MAIN STREET
HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH 92648
5. Fiscal Year: 1993
6. Total Number of Eligible Budgeted Positions: 19
7. Estimated Number of Training Hours Scheduled by Quarter:
1st 120 2nd 120 3rd 216 4th 96
8. Total Estimated Number of Training Hours Scheduled: 552
9. Estimated Costs per Quarter:
1st $ 2125.00 2nd $ 2125.00 3rd $ 2338.00 4th $ 1700.00
10. Total Estimated Cost of Training Plan $ 8288.00
Signed By: RONALD E. LOWENBERG
Title: CHIEF OF POLICE Signed on : 42392
12. Disbursement of Training Funds:
County of: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
C/o Name: DAN VILLELLA
Title: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Address: 2000 MAIN STREET
City: HUNTINGTON BEACH ZIP: 92648
Phone: (714) 5365225
! y
Annual Training Plan Application
D200B
DEPARTMENT: 182 Police Department YEAR: 1993
ELIGIBLE BUDGETED
POSITIONS 19
NUMBER OF QUARTER REPLACE- TRAVEL PER TUITION TOTALS
TRAINING MENT COSTS DIEM COSTS
HOURS COSTS COSTS
120 1ST .00 500.00 625.00 1000.00 2125.00
120 2ND .00 500.00 625.00 1000.00 2125.00
216 3RD .00 500.00 838.00 1000.00 2338.00
96 4TH .00 400.00 500.00 800.00 1700.00
552 TOTALS .00 1900.00 2588.00 3800.00 8288.00
Annual Training Plan Application
Worksheet C
DEPARTMENT: 182 Police Department YEAR: 1993
JOB CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY 1 ELIGIBLE BUDGETED
POSITIONS IN CATEGORY 1
NUMBER OF QUARTER REPLACE— TRAVEL PER TUITION TOTALS
TRAINING MENT COSTS DIEM COSTS
HOURS COSTS COSTS
24 1ST .00 100.00 125.00 200.00 425.00
0 2ND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
0 3RD .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
0 4TH .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
24 TOTALS .0 100.00 125.00 200.00 425.00
Annual Training Plan Application
Works hee t C
DEPARTMENT: 182 Police Department YEAR: 1993
JOB CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY 2 ELIGIBLE BUDGETED
POSITIONS IN CATEGORY 1
maxxxaassax ossas xxmxsxsxasxsxssex=s x=xs xxxxxs x=xsxxs3x=saxoxmsaxxxx=xxxsxx
NUMBER OF QUARTER REPLACE- TRAVEL PER TUITION TOTALS
TRAINING MENT COSTS DIEM COSTS
HOURS COSTS COSTS
24 1ST .00 100.00 125.00 200.00 425.00
0 2ND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
0 3RD .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
0 4TH .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
24 TOTALS .0 100.00 125.00 200.00 425.00
Annual Training Plan Application
• Worksheet C
DEPARTMENT: 182 Police Depaetment YEAR: 1993
JOB CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY 11 ELIGIBLE BUDGETED
POSITIONS IN CATEGORY 5
NUMBER OF QUARTER REPLACE- TRAVEL PER TUITION TOTALS
TRAINING MENT COSTS DIEM COSTS
HOURS COSTS COSTS
24 1ST .00 100.00 125.00 200.00 425.00
24 2ND .00 100.00 125.00 200.00 425.00
48 3RD .00 200.00 250.00 400.00 850.00
24 4TH .00 100.00 125.00 200.00 425.00
120 TOTALS .0 500.00 625.00 1000.00 2125.00
Annual Training Plan Application
Worksheet C
DEPARTMENT: 182 Police Department YEAR: 1993
JOB CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY 22 ELIGIBLE BUDGETED
POSITIONS IN CATEGORY 11
as aaaaas3aa3aaaaa aaaaa aaa3aaaaaaaaaaaa=aaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaemaaaa.a==
NUMBER OF QUARTER REPLACE- TRAVEL PER TUITION TOTALS
TRAINING MENT COSTS DIEM COSTS
HOURS COSTS COSTS
48 1ST .00 200.00 250.00 400.00 850.00
96 2ND .00 400.00 500.00 800.00 1700.00
48 3RD .00 200.00 250.00 400.00 850.00
72 4TH .00 300.00 375.00 600.00 1275.00
264 TOTALS .0 1100.00 1375.00 2200.00 4675.00
Annual Training Plan Application
Worksheet C
DEPARTMENT: 182 Police Department YEAR: 1993
JOB CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY 24 ELIGIBLE BUDGETED
POSITIONS IN CATEGORY 1
"1`3�J�33'S 3S3395-i��S'3�3�Ji3�i J33�S-J���"J 33��S53�3S33�J�3�33633��Ji�3-J�aSJ33-�
NUMBER OF QUARTER REPLACE- TRAVEL PER TUITION TOTALS
TRAINING MENT COSTS DIEM COSTS
HOURS COSTS COSTS
0 1ST .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
0 2ND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
120 3RD .00 100.00 338.00 200.00 638.00
0 4TH .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
120 TOTALS .0 100.00 338.00 200.00 638.00
- s
1
ORDINANCE NO. 2689
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF CORRECTIONS TO RECEIVE FUNDS TO. PAR-
TICIPATE IN THE STANDARDS AND TRAINING FOR
CORRECTIONS PROGRAM (STC)
WHEREAS, California Penal Code Title 7 , Chapter 5 ,
Articles 2 and 3 (commencing with section 6035 ) , provides that
a city may receive state aid in order to train custodial per-
sonnel. in a local detention facility; and
The Huntington Beach Police Department wishes to avail
itself of such training,
NOW,. THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does ordain as follows :
SECTION 1 . While receiving any state aid , the Huntington
Beach Police Department will adhere to the standards for selec-
tion and training, established by the California Board of
Corrections , as required under California Penal Code sec-
tion 6041 .
SECTION 2 . This ordinance shall take effect thirty days
after its adoption .
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th
day of June 1984 .
ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FORYI:
City Clerk City Attorney
ahb •
J/12/84
1.
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
' i
City Administrato Chief Police
NL '
2 .
•' Ord. No. 2689
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May
19 84 , and was again read to said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 4th day of June 19 84 , and
was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of
all the members of said City Council.
AYES: Councilmen:
MacAllister, Thomas, Kelly, Finley, Bailey, Mandic .
NOES : Councilmen:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
Pattinson
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council ,of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
L /WGia M. IMw worth CITY CLERK of the Ctty at
The foregoing instrument is a correct liuntiWon Beach and ex•off3cb Clerk of the City
copy of the original on file in this office. Council, do hereby certity that a synopsis of this
Attest N — i of —
ordinance has been published In the Huntington
19�
ALICIA M. V►ENTWOR7'H 3cach Independent on
p.
....................................................... .` .�....
1 ....
City Clerk and Ex•officio Clerk of the City In azcordaiice w1th trK city charter of said Cfty.
Council.of the City of Huntington Beach, 2t:ielA M. vtr>:NTwoRTh
.... California. _ - � ......................_._........._....._.._....._..... .._.._...cam clergy
L Deputy r'-
.............._.............
By _. .._. .. _.....___
1B•
�� 4' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: ROBERT FRANZ FROM: R. E. LOWENBERG
Deputy City Administrator Chief of Police
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR F. I.S. DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1992
Attached to this memo is a copy of an RCA which is being submitted
for the December 21st Council meeting. It is requesting the
transfer of 1992-1993 STC Grant Funds ($8, 288) from the General
Fund to the Jail Training Account (E-AA-PD-334-540-00) .
Would you please check the account and determine if this money is
available for use, and prepare the required F.I.S. in time for the
listed council meeting.
REL/grs
Encl
H ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUESTED TRANSFER OF JAIL TRAINING GRANT FUNDS, FIS 93-30
DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1992
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared for
the proposed application of 1992/93 Jail Training Grant Funds, in the amount of
$8,288, to be used as a supplement to the Police Department's budgeted Jail
Training Account (E-AA-PD-334-540-00).
Upon approval of the City Council , the balance of the unaudited, undesignated
Jail Training Grant would be reduced to $1 ,474.
ROBERT J. FRAN
Deputy City Adm -ni strat
RJF:skd
WPADSERT:1202
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date December 21 , 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPROVED BY CITY COuNc-TT
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrat
Prepared by: Ron Hayden, Director, Library Services
Subject: FAMILIES FOR LITERACY STATE GRANT FOR LIBRARY LITERACY
PROGRAM, JAN. 1, 1993 - JUNE 30, 1993
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ) Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
........................_.............._.......................__..........I._._._._............1........
The California State Library has notified the City of a grant approved in
the amount of $7537 for funding a Families For Literacy ( FFL) program
through the Library Literacy Center during the period of January 1 , 1993,
through June 30, 1993 .
RECOMMENDATION:
......................_........................._......._._........__._..,..
Approve an amendment to the current year budget by appropriating $7537 from
the unappropriated fund balance of the general fund #GAA 30101 for
implementation of family literacy project. These funds will be transferred
to expenditure accounts to cover costs for personnel , books, and supplies.
ANALYSIS:
This state grant provides funding for a special adult literacy project,
focusing on teaching parents to read to their children five years and
under. A special target group of the program will be families in the Oak
View Elementary School area. It will fund the salary of a half-time
project coordinator and storyteller, children' s books to give to
participants, and office supplies. The general fund will be used only
temporarily and will be reimbursed by the State by February, 1993.
FUNDING SOURCE:
California State Library.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Reject the grant funds.
ATTACHMENTS:
................_.........................................
Grant application
Grant award notification letter
Appropriation revision form
P10 5/85
FAMILIES FOR LITERACY GRANT PROPOSAL
PLAN OF SERVICE
RATIONALE
Research in the fields of education, sociology, anthropology
and linguistics has repeatedly borne out the common sense notion
that literacy--or illiteracy--begins in the home, at a very early
age. In a desire to more effectively address the intergenerational
nature of illiteracy, the Huntington Beach Library is greatly
interested in establishing a Families for Literacy program as a
part of its on-going adult literacy services . The purpose for
this program is to focus on the interaction between children and
low-level reading parents , and to forge a strong link between the
library, reading, and families . Since the family unit is the major
determining factor of the literacy level of the next generation, we
believe that this focus should be a required component of any
complete adult literacy program.
The Families for Literacy project is designed to help adult
learners and their families develop and enhance an appreciation of
the value of reading; become aware of the importance of sharing
literacy experiences of all types , especially story reading, with
children; and to acquaint family members with all the services of
the library, to the world of children ' s literature, and to ideas on
parenting, health and other subjects of vital interest to them.
Out of a current enrollment of 140 adult basic reading
learners , our literacy program is serving approximately 25 learners
with children age 5 and under. Families for Literacy will target
these learners and their families in particular, and others as they
enter the adult literacy program, to adopt reading as a family
activity.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The overall goal of the program is the development of a home
environment for these families that will be more conducive to
developing the pre-reading and reading abilities of the children,
in addition to those of the parent learners . This goal entails the
accomplishment of several specific objectives :
1 . Enhancing parent awareness of their own importance in helping
children to develop pre-reading skills and a high value for
reading.
2 . Providing parent learners with books and materials that they
can use with their children at home .
3 . Increasing awareness by parent participants of the full range
of library services , resulting in increased use of those services .
PROGRAM SERVICES
Tutor Training: We recognize the crucial role that tutors play in
a family literacy program by providing the learners with ongoing
learning experiences to introduce, reinforce and enhance concepts
and skills covered in the group sessions . The training of all new
tutors will include a component which teaches them techniques for
modeling reading to children and for parent-child interaction, in
addition to concepts about children ' s language development . By the
end of the tutor training, they will have the opportunity to
volunteer as a family tutor. Tutors already in our program who
wish to participate in the Family Project will attend a separate
in-service with the same content. This component will be designed
using a variety of resources , some of which are already in our
collection from previous experience with a two-year family literacy
project which we conducted on site in a disadvantaged neighborhood
of the City several years ago. The experience gained in that
project will stand us in good stead in carrying out the herein
proposed FFL project.
The tutors will be expected to play a very active and
important role in the Project in their on-going one-on-one work
with parent learners . They will meet for an orientation before
each four-week series of family activity sessions and will work
with learners on specific children ' s books that will be featured
and distributed at each storytime .
Learner Recruitment: Parent learners who are already in the adult
literacy program will be targeted initially. Others who are
specifically recruited for participation in the FFL Project will be
matched with program tutors .
A Huntington Beach City program called Project Self-
Sufficiency will provide a source of some of the externally
recruited learners . PS-S is a program which provides support for
single parents and their children while the parents further their
education to the point of "self-sufficiency. " Many of these single
parents have limited literacy skills and need a heightened
awareness of their own importance in their children ' s reading
development. Another major source of learner recruitment will be
the Huntington Beach Adult School ' s Teen Mom program, whose
director, Cathy Richey, has asked us to speak to her classes . The
children ' s librarian has already received requests for family
literacy activities . We have a minimum participation goal of 20
families for the Project.
Family activities : A team composed of the FFL coordinator, the
adult literacy coordinator, a children ' s librarian, the children ' s
services storytime presenter, and a library administrator will meet
monthly to coordinate, plan and evaluate the family literacy
program activities .
The core of the program will be a four-week series of weekly
sessions for families with children up to age 5 . This four-week
series will be offered four times during the grant year: in
October, December, March and May. Each session of the series will
be offered twice during the week, one weekday evening and Saturday
afternoon, in order to ensure access to as many participants as
possible. Each series will include the following content for
parent learners :
1 . Orientation to library and its services, with a tour of
the facility; a library card will be issued to all learners .
2 . How to use books , puppets, nursery rhymes and other
activities with children.
3 . Familiarization with children ' s literature, how to choose
books and read them at home with children.
4 . Information and discussion about any parallel subjects
such as child language development, parenting, child care, health
issues, etc . , that participants wish to explore.
Each weekly session of approximately 60 minutes will consist
of the following components :
1 . Children' s storytime of about forty minutes will be
conducted by either the library storytime presenter or a children ' s
librarian. Older children in the family will be invited to
participate in the storytime as well .
2 . Concurrently with thirty minutes of the children ' s
storytime, the adults will meet in a separate area learning about
the subjects ennumerated above, and/or any others they choose to
explore, with the assistance of the FFL coordinator and children ' s
librarian, and outside speakers as they are appropriate to the
subject of discussion.
3 . During the last ten minutes of the children' s storytime,
parents will join them to observe and participate in the children ' s
activities . The materials to be used in each storytime will be
made available in advance to tutors and learners for preview and
practice . Copies of the books will be given to the parents to use
during the storytime and to add to their home library. Other
children ' s books will also be available for selection by parents at
that time, with the assistance of the children ' s librarian and FFL
coordinator. Graded booklists will be provided for the use of
older children.
4 . The final fifteen to twenty minutes of each session will
allow time for informal interaction of all participants while they
partake of refreshments . This time is important to the
establishment of a cohesive, mutually supportive group that can
help individual participants overcome feelings of isolation, fear,
etc . , that might otherwise prevent their staying in the program.
The books to be used in the Project and distributed to
families will be selected under the direction of the children ' s
librarian. They will reflect a variety of types , reading levels
and subject matter, be appropriate reading for the diversity of
ethnic groups we expect to participate (primarily Hispanics , Asians
and whites) , and represent a high quality of children ' s literature.
PROMOTION
The family project will be promoted through the literacy
program' s bi-monthly newsletter; at tutor and learner meetings,
including at the upcoming Tutor and Learner Recognition event in
June; in the city' s quarterly activities bulletin, The Sands , which
is sent to every household in the city; and in the city manager ' s
weekly communication to all departments of the city. Tutors of
eligible parents will be especially important as recruiters . The
HBTV Cable Channel, under the direction of the City Public
Information Officer, will continue .as it has in the past to be very
supportive in promoting the activities of the literacy program.
All agencies which currently refer learners to our program will be
made aware of the FFL Project, and particularly close interaction
will be maintained with the programs mentioned above as primary
sources of participants .
EVALUATION
The program will be evaluated by both quantitative and
qualitative methods in order to determine how successful it has
been in achieving our objectives .
1 . The amount of time each family spends reading will be
monitored, as reported on a Reading Calendar they will be asked to
keep. Their attendance at program sessions will also be noted.
2 . Monthly Progress Reports submitted by tutors will help to
monitor the number of times a family uses the library outside of
the time spent in tutoring and FFL sessions . They will also record
any changes in parent attitudes about reading, in their reading and
writing habits, in their skills and interests .
3 . Learneks will be asked to complete a final evaluation
questionnaire after each four-week series . The questionnaire will
also solicit their suggestions about how to improve the program.
PROGRAM CONTINUANCE
The Huntington Beach Library Director is committed to the
success of the adult literacy program and the addition of the
family literacy component . The Children ' s Services Director, Nancy
Williams, is extremely enthusiastic about adding this component to
the library's services because she has frequently observed the need
and demand for it among library patrons . She and other Children ' s
staff will participate in the FFL project as part of their regular
duties .
The City administration is strongly supportive of all the
literacy program' s work, in that it provides most of our printing
needs as well as publicity through the cable channel and
publications . City Council members regularly lend their presence
at our recognition and fundraising events, and many city employees
are reading tutors .
A number of service clubs and businesses have contributed in-
kind and monetarily to the literacy program and have indicated a
willingness to contribute to the success of the FFL project .
TIMELINE
Summer Information about the family project will be distributed
to all agencies that refer learners to the literacy
program. Literacy coordinator will meet with staff
members of the Adult School, Project Self-Sufficiency and
Head Start.
The family literacy component will be incorporated into
the next tutor training workshop. The component will be
offered as an in-service to already trained tutors, who
will begin encouraging their learners , if eligible, to
think about enrolling in the family program.
Fall Hire coordinator
Purchase materials
Orient Library staff to the program and how they will be
expected to contribute.
VISA PROGRAM BUDGET REQUEST FOR FAMILIES FOR LITERACY PROGRAMS
Fiscal Year 199Z93 REVISED BUDGET
October 16 , 1992
Huntington Beach Library
Na o f Libra
May 20 , 1992 Library Director SOwAlre Date
(a) (b) (c) Approved CLSA Budget
Budget CLSA Families Other Budget Total Estimated (Completed by ct.sA)
Categories Budget Request Yearly Budget
(a + b)
Gary E. Strong
1. Personnel 6300 6300
2. Library
Materials
3, Operations 1237 1600 2 R 3 7
3a. Contract
Services
3b, Travel
incl . food
3c. Office 237 200 437
Supplies
in-kind
3d, Printing 500 500
3e. Instructional 500 500
Resources
3f. Children's 1000 1000
Book
Resources
communication 400
3g. Other 400
4, Equipment
S. Indirect
6. TOTAL 7537 1600 9137
CLSA FFL Fom-62
BUDGET ATTACHMENTS
Personnel
Family literacy coordinator/Children's storytime presenter:
500 hours total @$12 . 15/hour (temporary recurrent status,
FICA, etc. )
Responsible for coordinating all aspects of the project; plan
and present adult programs; conduct storytimes for children;
order all materials, conduct recruitment and outreach efforts .
Children' s librarian (no salary from this grant) : Will assist in
group activities, children's activities, book selection
Adult literacy program director (no salary from this grant) :
Act as liaison between library administration, staff, tutors,
and learners, and serve as consultant in planning and
implementation of program.
Literacy Assistant (no salary from this grant) :
Will assist with mail and telephone communications and record
keeping.
R�
° ThE�, California Library Services Board
V 4
W
UBRARY-COURTS BUILDING (916) 322-8476
-, P.O. BOX 942837 ATSS 492-8476
+tiroaN`� SACRAMENTO, CA 94237-0001
November 24, 1992
Ronald Hayden, Library Director
Huntington Beach Public Library
7111 Talbet Avenue
Huntington Beach, CA 92648-1296
Dear Mr. Hayden:
I am pleased to announce that the application of Huntington Beach Public Library for funding a
Families For Literacy (FFL) program has been approved in the amount of $ 7,537. The grant is
effective immediately and you are encouraged to begin as soon as possible.
Funds will be sent to you in two checks. The first should arrive within six to eight weeks, and the
second in February 1993. Reporting procedures will be mailed to you later. I enclose the approved
FFL Budget page that supports your library's Families for Literacy proposal. Also enclosed is a
master (for duplicating) of the Budget Change Request form to be used if changes in the approved
FFL budget should become necessary.
It is expected that you will continue to participate fully in the California Literacy Campaign.
Our Family Literacy Specialist, Dr. Carole Talan, will be working with you on this grant. You may
contact her at (916) 322-0362.
I look forward to your continued development of creative activity that would help define new ways
to break the cycle of illiteracy.
Sincerely,
Z4 r jz�
Gary E. Strong, Chief Executive Officer
California Library Services Board
Enclosures
GES:CST:ct
FUND9293.GES
[S
I:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
APPROPRIATION REVISION
DATE REQUESTED I / 1 1 — 101 1 — ILI�
FUNDS TRANSFERRED FROM AMOUNT
iI - f ICI - ICI - 1161 1 - f_I - I_1_1 - I_I_f $f_f_I•I_I_1_LI.f�I I.L1•I 0 1-1
I_I - I_l_I - I_I_I - I_l_i_! - I_! - I_I—! - I_I_I $1_I_I�I_I_l_i.l_i_I_I•I_1rl
TOTAL $I_I_I.I_I_171.1 ICI�I•I�I 0I
FUNDS TRANSFERRED TO AMOUNT
IL! - I�1u,! - !�!�! - ICI-�!`%! - I!I - !?�-!v! - I°I°! $1_I_!-!_I_I�zl•l�I ��I�!•!�?!�?I
f `�! - I G I �! - i � 151 - ! ��I 1 I i I - !�I - !�I�I - i of°I $I_I_I,I_I_I_I,I_LLI�1•!��!
Ei I?f•I`DELI
I—�J (1(I 1 $1_I_1 o!_4_1 t l.10 0 l 01•I°
TOTAL $I_i_I.I_I_I I.I I?I i•I �!
JUSTIFICATION FOR TRANSFER
Fund accounts need to be established for Families for Literacy State
Grant for Library Literacy Trogram, January 1 , 1993 — June 30 , 1993
grant period . Accounts are for temporary salaries , FICA , supplies ,
and children ' s books .
AUTHORIZATIONS
0�
1. D 19 P A R TartNT EA-D' DATE
✓� 2. FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE
3. CITY ADMINISTRATOR DATE
All dmnges to aapdtal c &3W bests M4AM awl Of 1 UMIrb 3.
Ctrrrps to the total Yatset ct any c9 Ea Im, I cr brd requires the anxuml of City Oouril and 1 tb=ugh 3.
Please attach anzmml of qp"Ved C xrjc:il Minbas if gplicahle.
amtrfts wathhn apwdy-txms Cabs=iesWanaal swAces and Ong amass ) of sane depezthhM arI fund
reguixe allPnoVaIS cf 1 and 2.
dn
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUESTED APPROPRIATION FOR ADVANCE FUNDING OF FAMILY LITERACY GRANT
PROGRAM, FIS 93-32
DATE: DECEMBER 10, 1992
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared for
the proposed appropriation of $7,537 to fund personnel and operating costs for
the Families For Literacy (FFL) Grant Program for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
Upon approval of the City Council , the balance of the unaudited, undesignated
General Fund would be reduced to $3,407,000, plus an additional $6,738,000 which
is reserved from the AB 702 (PERS) credits, prior to the antici ed
reimbursement of these monies to the City from a Siva .
RO RT J. FRAN
Deputy City Adm' istrator
RJF:skd
WPADSERT:1202
REQUEST FORE CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date Octoher 5F 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor & City Council ��..,�
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administratorw�
Prepared by: Patricia A. Dapkus, Management Assistants
Subject: COVERAGE OF EXPENSES FOR WASHINGTON TRIP
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
AV - 's 19
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Excep 'on
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Act' , ktta hmen_s ----- ---
STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Reimbursement of expenses for Councilman
Green for a trip to Washington, D.C. to receive the Theodore
Roosevelt Conservation Award.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the reimbursement for the cost of Councilman Green's
round trip airfare, two days per diem, and ground transportation
expenses for a trip to Washington, D.C. September 30 - October 2 .
ANALYSIS:
Councilman Green is to be honored in a special ceremony, hosted
by the President of the United States in which he will receive
the prestigious Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Award for his
contributions as an environmentalist and a conservationist.
As a founding member and former president of the Amigas de Bolsa
Chica, as a City Council member and former Mayor for the City of
Huntington Beach, and throughout his years of community
involvement in Huntington Beach, Peter has served our Citizens
by taking a leadership role in preserving and enhancing the
natural beauty and unique qualities of the Huntington Beach
coastal area.
The Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Award is presented each year
to only a very select group of people. In receiving this award,
Peter honors not only himself and his family but all of
Huntington Beach as well. And, having one of our leading
citizens so honored contributes to the growing recognition of
Huntington Beach as one of the diminishing, unique wetlands areas
in the United States.
r
LP
P10 5/85
a
Because of his countless hours of service to the City and
Citizens of Huntington Beach, it seems only fitting that we
provide financial support to Peter in this journey to honor.
FUNDING SOURCE:
City Council out of area conference account.
ALTERNATE ACTION:
1. Deny reimbursement of travel expenses.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Letter to Congressman Rohrabacher notifying him of the award
and scheduling the ceremony.
PD/pad _
..Jt I- L V JL V• 1 L
DANA ROHRARACHER co :
42N0 DISTRICT,CALIFORNIA
SCIENCE,SPACE,,AND
COMMITTEES:
TECHNOLOGY
SUBCOMMITTEE ON TECHNOLOGY
AND COMPETfINENESS
WASHINGTON OFFICE:
SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPADE
1039 LONOWOPTN HOV$f OFFICE.BUILDING
WASHMCION,DC 20575-0542 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
(202)225-2415 FAX;(202)22$-0745 �Congrtmq of `b` Ottitle y, *tatitt REPUBLICAN CHAIRMAN,AND
HEALTH
MITTFE
1V7 MP.fiAAIFF 1 4Yr f`1 ill ON FISCAL AFFAIRS ANO HEALTH
DISTRICT OFFICE: SUBCOMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
16162 BEACH BOULEVARD,SUITE 304 Ouse of Reprrorntaftbeo AND EDUCATION
HUNTIN6TON BFACN,CA 2284 7-2 8 1 3 REPUBLICAN RESEARCH COMMITTEE
(714)847-2483 (310)325-0668 CO.CHAIAMAN,TASK FORCE ON THE
FAX:1714)947-5153 STRATEGIC DEFENSE INITIATIVE
CO-CHAIRMAN,TASK FORCE ON TERRORISM
AND UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE
TO; COUNCILMAN PETER GREEN FAX NO. �L�'--
FROM: KATHLEEN HOLLINGSWORTH FAX NO. 714-847-5153
Office of Congressman Dana Rohrabacher
RE: ROOSEVRLT CONSERVATION AWARD CEREMONIES
Number of Pages (Not including poveir)
1. Award Ceremony is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. on Thursday,
October 1 in the' Indian Treaty Roan, Old Executive office
Building.
2. Indian Treaty Room can accomodate 100 people; member (of
Congress) and honoree will attend/participate in the award
ceremony.
3_ No press at the actual event although there will be a
press opportunity following the ceremony. A photographer
will be present at the ceremony to record individual awards.
4_ spouses are invited to a post-ceremony lunch hosted by
Congressman Duncan Hunter for the honorees.
5. Dana would like to take Mrs. Green, your good self, and
other family members to lunch at the Members Dining Room
on either September 30 or October 2.
6. Please note on the aa '.ompanying letter that you are referred
to as a winner. We concur: :
SEP 28 ' 92 8: 13
PORTER GOSS. FLORIDA
CHAIRMAN 1622 LONOWORTH HOa
(202)2mmy
PROJECT 102 .,V
HOUSE REPUBLICAN RESEARCH COMMITTEE
U.S. HOUSE OF REPAE$ENTATIVES
WASHINGTON. 04. 20s78
September 16, 1992
Tile .�,. . ..-
1039 Longworth HOB
ATTN: Stephen Ratsurinis
Washington, DC 20515-0542
Dear Dana:
We have just received word from the White House that your nominee
for the 1992 Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Award has been
approved. We are delighted that there are 56 members participating
in this second bi-annual event.
The final planning is now underway for a White House award
ceremony, scheduled for 9:30 AM on Thursday, October 1 1992 in the
Indian Treaty Room of the Old Executive Office Building. All
participating members are invited to present certificates to their
award winners at this event. Members and their nominees should plan
to arrive at the Pennsylvania Avenue entrance to the OEOB between
9:0 and 9:10 AM' on the 1st.
Given the uncertainty of the President's schedule, we cannot
confirm his attendance. , However, award certificates will be signed
by the President (along with members) . In addition, Mike Deland,
chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) will assist
in conferring the award certificates and we also hope Bill Reilly,
administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , will
participate, schedule permitting.
The Republican Research Committee is in the process of printing
the award certificates, which we will soon bring to you for
signature. There will be no press permitted at the actual award
ceremony, however we will arrange to have a photographer present
during the award preaentations. Any travel coots related to
winners' attendance of the event are the responsibility of the
winner.
we do need to know whether members and their nominees will be
yam`;�•�.a�"� �F�� $oic��s���s±Ra:,r�r�"io��l--.��iES7'1 to a V �A tZ'l�it! 8�
09-22-92 03! 36PM P02
9EP -,8 ' 92 e: 13 PAGE . 003
Page 2
We encourage you to make public announcements in your district
about award winners and their accomplishments. If you need ideas or
additional information for press releases, radio actualities, or
weekly columns, please call Joe with Rep. Goss @ (5-2536) or Ron
with GOP Research (5-0871) .
Kindest regards,
Porter Goss Duncan Hunter
Chairman, Project 102 Chairman, GOP Research
PP.
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date: October 5, 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administr %APPROVED
Prepared by: Ronald E. Lowenberg, Chief of Police BY CITY COUNCIL
Subject: Funding for Career Criminal Apprehension Pro(C-Cap) Grant --
CITY'CLLt
Consistent with Council Policy [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: �Q&z'
Statement of Issue:
On November 4, 1991, City Council approved Resolution No. 6328, allowing the City to
participate in a joint application with six other cities for grant funds to establish a multi-
jurisdictional Crime Analysis Unit. The grant has been approved and funds are now
needed so that accounts can be established to purchase equipment and supplies and to
pay personnel costs for the first year. The funds will be reimbursed by the grant and by
the participating jurisdictions as they are spent. There is some urgency to this request
as steps toward implementation of the program must begin within 90 days of approval.
Recommended Council Action:
Approve the use of money from the General Fund reserve account in the amount of
$215,953 to fund the first year of operation which will end on July 1, 1993.
Analysis:
The City of Huntington Beach has joined with the cities of Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley,
Irvine, Newport Beach, Seal Beach, Westminster and the County of Orange in requesting
grant funds through the Office of Criminal Justice Planning (OCJP) to establish the Career
Criminal Apprehension Program (CCAP). The program is designed to provide crime trend
information to help identify, apprehend and prosecute persons committing the greatest
numbers of serious crimes in those jurisdictions.
i
FUNDING FOR CAREER CRIMINAL APPREHENSION PROGRAM - con't.
Page two
Grant funds for the personnel, equipment and supplies will be disbursed in the form of
reimbursement after the expenditures are made. Because there was no assurance of
grant approval and because the money will only be used temporarily until reimbursement
is received, the necessary funds were not included in the 1992/1993 budget requests.
Matching funds from the participating jurisdictions totals $21,596, with the Huntington
Beach share totaling $6,304.06. The participating cities and the county will be billed for
their shares.
Funding Source:
It is requested that the General Fund Reserve Account be used as a temporary funding
source. No funds were budgeted in the 1992/1993 budget since there was no assurance
of grant approval and if approved, the grant will pay 90 percent of the costs.
Alternative Actions:
1. Deny use of General Fund monies.
2. Use an alternate source of funding.
Attachments:
Copy of the original "Request for City Council Action" dated November 4, 1991.
2
S T^ CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date November 4, 1991
'91 NOV -6 15 :05
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Michael Uberuaga City Administrator P BY CITY CouNc
19
Prepared by: Ronald E . Lowenberg , Chief of Police
Subject: Office of Criminal Justice Planning Grant
19J
Proposal (Career Criminal Apprehension Pro r-&a
Consistent with Council Policy? Yes New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
Statement of Issue :
Representatives from the police departments for the cities of Irvine , Costa
Mesa, Newport Beach, Fountain Valley, Seal Beach and Westminster have met
with Huntington Beach police representatives and agreed to submit a joint
grant proposal , if approved by the governing board of each city. The grant
funds will provide for a Multi-Jurisdictional Crime Analysis Unit .
The Crime Analysis Unit (CAU) would be responsible for providing crime
trend information - on those criminals effecting multiple jurisdictions . This
information would aid police operational personnel in making tactical
decisions, focusing on specific problems and increase the likelihood of
effective prosecution of career criminal offenders .
Recommendations :
Respectfully request the City Council approve the attached resolution
outlining the City ' s commitment for the following funds c:-. er a four year
period starting July 1992 .
July, 1992 : $ 15 , 947
July, 1993 : $ 19 , 677
July, 1994 : $ 48 , 182
July, 1995 : $ 72 , 381
Total Huntington Beach commitment over four years : $ 156 , 187
Analysis : .
The Career Criminal Apprehension Program (C-CAP ) is made up of four one
year grants . The program is designed to identify, apprehend, and
successfully prosecute those criminals who tend to commit the greatest
number of more serious crimes . The grant money comes from the State of
California and is distributed through the office of Criminal Justice
Planning (OCJP) . This program has been in existence for approximately
thirteen years and has proven instrumental in apprehending criminals and
helping law enforcement focus on local crime problems . The total grant
funds to be requested from OCJP is $ 1 , 856 , 660 over the . four year period .
-2-
In a highly mobile society, career criminals often strike multiple
jurisdictions . At this time there is no formal method of collecting
crime trend data from neighboring jurisdictions to determine if several
jurisdictions are being victimized by the same criminal . This problem is
aggravated by the increase in gang activity and serial criminals that
victimize multiple jurisdictions . There are several recent examples . One
is the "Envelope Bandit" , who committed thirty five armed robberies in
fourteen neighboring communities over a five month period . Another
example is the criminal known as the "Puppy Dog" rapist because he asks
victims to help him look for his puppies that ran into the bushes . The
Puppy Dog Rapist has not been captured, and he has struck more then one
jurisdiction .
The purpose of the C-CAP program is to provide for immediate
communications of criminal activity to all jurisdictions and aid the
police in identifying the criminal . The C-CAP Grant funds would be used
to hire the personnel and develop the systems necessary to operate a
dedicated CAU . With improved data collection and dissemination
capabilities directed toward crime trend analysis , the problem-solving
and decision-making skills of all police personnel will be improved . The
C-CAP program also lends itself to other joint operations that would
improve the performance of all participating police agencies .
Funding Source :
Appropriate from unappropriated fund balance of the Narcotic Awarded
Forfeiture Fund (Acct . #RSN 6-33-00 ) , as well as the OCJP grant funds .
Alternatives :
1 . Approve this resolution and seek the Office Of Criminal
Justice Planning grant funds .
2 . Do not approve the resolution.
Attachments
RESOLUTION # 6328
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO JOIN THE
CAREER CRIMINAL APPREHENSION PROGRAM
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
desires to undertake a certain project designated as the Career
Criminal Apprehension Program, administered by the Office of
Criminal Justice Planning (hereinafter referred to as OCJP) .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT -RESOLVED that Ronald Lowenberg , Chief
of Police of the City of Huntington Beach, is authorized on its
behalf to submit the attached proposal to OCJP and is
authorized to execute on behalf of the City Council the
attached Grant Award Agreement including any extensions or
amendments thereof .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant agrees to provide
all matching funds required for said project (including any
amendments thereof) under the Program and the funding terms and
conditions of OCJP and that the cash match will be appropriated
as required.
IT IS AGREED that any liability arising out of the
performance of this Grant Award Agreement, including civil
court actions for damages , shall be the responsibility of the
grant recipient and the authorizing agency. The State of
California and OCJP disclaim responsibility for any such
liability.
- 1 -
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder
shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by this
body.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on
the 4th day of November 1991 .
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPRO D:
r � '
i t y Admini rator ief of Police
2 -
Res . No. 6328
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I , CONNIE BROCKWAY, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day
Of November 19 91 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
Mar-AllictPr. Winchell. Silva, Green, Kelly, Robitaille
NOES: Councilmembers:
None
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
Moulton—Patterson
City Clerk and ex-or lclo Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
a CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To: Robert Franz, Deputy City Administrator
From: Ronald E . Lowenberg, Chief of Police
Subject: Request for Financial Impact Statement ' -
Date: September 21, 1992
Attached to this memorandum is a copy of an RCA which is
being submitted for the October 5, 1992 council meeting. It
is requesting the use of $215, 953 from the General Fund
Reserve Account to fund personnel costs and equipment for
the Career Criminal Apprehension Program Grant for fiscal
year 1992/1993 . The money will be re-imbursed by the grant
as well as the participating cities and the county.
Would you please check the account and determine if this
money is available for use and prepare the required FIS for
the listed council meeting. There is some urgency to the
request as we have 90 days from the date of approval to
began implementation of the program.
REL/mrs
Encl
H
1�4' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUESTED FUNDING FOR THE CAREER CRIMINAL APPRREHENSION PROGRAM,
FIS 93-21
DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 1992
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared for
the proposed appropriation of $215,953 to fund personnel costs and equipment for
the Career Criminal Apprehension Program Grant for Fiscal Year 1992/93.
Upon approval of the City Council , the balance of the unaudited, undesignated
General Fund would be reduced to $3,722,000, plus an additional $6,738.000 which
is reserved from the AB 702 (PERS) credits, prior to the anticipated
reimbursement of these monies to the City by the tate.
-ROBER Z
Deputy City A ministrator
RJF:skd
WPADSERT:1122
RCA - ROUTING SHEET/CHECKLIST
TPITIATING DEPARTMENT POLICE DATE 9/22/92
SUBJECT FUNDING FOR CAREER CRIMINAL APPREHENSION PRS IRAM
AGENDA DATE 10/5/92 AGENDA DEADLINE
(TO ADMINISTRATION)
YES NO
PUBLIC HEARING [ ] [ xx] PUBLICATION DATE
(Most FEES require a Public Hearing. Seek the City Attorney's advice on fees. )
DATE TO CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney
(With Exhibits) (Initial when complete)
INITIATING DEPARTMENT REVIEW/CHECKLIST
REQUIRED BACKUP YES NO CHECK BELOW IF ATTACHED
ordinance [ ] I [ ]
Resolution [ ] ( x] ( ]
Signed Contract/Agreement ( ] I M [ ]
Negative Dec./EIR [ ] [ yj [ ]
Insurance ( ] [ x] ( ]
Bond/s ( ] [ x] ( ]
Map/s [ ] ( x] [ ]
Financial Impact Statement (x] [ ] ( ]
(Unbudgeted Items over $10,000)
RCA - City Council [ x] ( ] [ x]
RCA - Redevelopment Agency [ ] I ]
REVIEWED BY INITIATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA COORDINATOR:(
. E. NBERG, Chief o Police
ADMINISTRATION REVIEW [ ]
COMMENTS:
PUBLIC HEARING Public Hearings are required on many
development issues and most fees. If
you need clarification on the need for
a Public Hearing include a request for
advice in your Request for Legal
Serivice (RLS) .
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION To add to or amend the City Code,
departments must submit a RLS
describing the desired revision so that
it can be put in proper ordinance or
resolution form and reviewed for any
legal concerns.
An ordinance or resolution is also
needed to establish a new fee or revise
an existing fee. An RLS should be
submitted to the City Attorney for
these as well.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT All contracts/agreements must be
submitted to the City Attorney Office
for review and approval. With few
exceptions, the City Attorney requires
two signature by the contractor before
final approval can be given.
NEGATIVE DEC. /EIR All projects within the City require
either a Negative Declaration or an
Environmental Impact Report(EIR) .
Community Development staff should be
consulted as to which is needed.
INSURANCE Proof of insurance is usually required
of contractors with the city as well as
companies doing work in a city right-
of-way. Seek advice via your RLS if
you are unsure.
BONDS Are required of contractors with the
City and developers. Again, as part
of your RLS you can seek advice on the
need for bonds.
MAPS Maps should be attached to identify the
location of all projects or tracts.
/— 9,L v ta'e� K&(,s e'a
Gu a�.r✓ Lee-
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
ED 92-43
Date September 21, 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Submitted by: �-----
Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrato l
Prepared by: —
Barbara A. Kaiser, Deputy City Administrator/Economic Development
Subject: APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCY FUNDING
19f
Consistent with Council Policy? N Yes [ ] New Policy or Exceptio
I
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
On three occasions the City council has taken actions approving contributions to Public
Service sub-grantees totaling $218,850 or equivalent to 15% of the CDBG grant. In
order to donate that amount up to $96,000 would have to come from the General Fund.
The General Fund contribution was approved but not appropriated. The purpose of this
RCA is to appropriate the previously approved $96,000.
RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Appropriate $96,000 of General Fund money on a one time only basis to be used to
Y Y
make grants to Public Service Agencies serving Huntington Beach under the CDBG a'
program.
ry
ANALYSIS:
This year, in order to compensate for previous years over expenditures in the Public
Service category HUD is requiring the City to reduce expenditures in the category of
Public Services. The maximum amount of the reduction is $96,000. Rather than
penalize the various Public Services or residents dependent on services the City Council
voted to maintain spending on Public Services at a level equivalent to what the grant
would have been if the City were not required to reduce expenditures. On March 2,
1992 the City Council voted to set Public Service spending for 1992/93 at $218,850.
The 1992/93 CDBG grant is to fund $122,850 and the General Fund is to provide
$96,000. On May 18, 1992 the City Council approved the entire CDBG Budget that
showed funding for 16 Public Service Agencies split between CDBG and General
Fund. On July 6, 1992 the City Council approved the sixteen individual contracts with
the designated sub-grantees. None of these documents discussed the need for General
Fund money and sought approval to appropriate $96,000. Therefore, staff is
requesting this action.
Plo 5/85
r
Without this appropriation, the City will not be able to execute the previously approved
contracts with:
Legal Aid Society;
Interval House;
Orange County Consolidated Transportation;
Girls & Boys Club of HB/FY;
Hotline of Southern California;
Orange Coast Interfaith; and
Casa Youth Shelter.
FUNDING SOURCE:
General Fund
ALTERNATE ACTION:
Cancel the contracts for grant aid to the above listed agencies.
ATTACHMENTS:
FIS No. 93-15
g
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUESTED APPROPRIATION TO FACILITATE FULL PUBLIC SERVICE FUNDING
FOR FY 1992/93, FIS 93-15
DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1992
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared for
the proposed appropriation of $96,000 to allow for the City to fully fund all of
the Public Service sub-grantee projects for fiscal year 1992/93.
Upon approval of the City Council , the balance of the unaudited, undesignated
General Fund would be reduced to $3,927,000, plus an additional $6,738,000 which
is reserved from the AB 702 (PERS) credits.
6
ROBERT J. FR NZ
Deputy City ministrato
RJF:skd
WPADSERT:1086
n /—Gvet "'eC )
Lem
�i�NCf ar
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
t Date September 8, 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council AePROVED BY CITY COUNCI-1.
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator � - 19fA
Prepared by: Louis F. Sandoval, Director of Public Works ' '
CI Y CLi, K
Subject: SUPPLEMENTAL EXPENDITURES FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS
Consistent with Council Policy? [ X Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE..
Supplemental expenditure budgets for several Public Works projects currently under
construction must be carried over from FY 1991/92 to FY 1992/93.
RE NDA N•
Appropriate funds for supplemental expenditures for certain Public Works projects carried
over from FY 1991/92 to FY 1992/93.
ANALYSES:
Construction budgets for most Public Works projects include an supplemental expenditure
budget. This budget covers the cost of essential services outside the scope of the
agreement with the contractor. Examples of such services include Southern California
Edison costs to provide a building or park meter pedestal with electricity; Southern
California Gas fees to install a gas meter at a new city building; and soil
testing/laboratory costs for checking suitability of soil for development and/or planting of
landscape improvements. These are services that the Contractor cannot provide, and the
true scope of most of them and even the provider cannot be anticipated at the time of the
contract award.
Council approves an appropriation of funds for supplemental expenditures when a
construction contract is awarded; however, the funds are not encumbered until an
appropriate supplemental expenditure occurs. Unencumbered project supplemental funds
are not carried over from the fiscal year to the next. However, some projects take more
than one fiscal year to complete or, the project may start midway through one year and
not be completed until the following midyear. Therefore, supplemental funds, for some
Public Works projects, must be carried over from one fiscal year to the next. This
requires reappropriation of funds.
The Director of Public Works request that Council authorize the Director of Finance to
carry over of supplemental funds for the following projects:
Project Description Carry Over Amount
Main Street Scapes $21,474.24
Central Library Expansion 15,000.00
Blufftop Landscape V 2,000.00 �
Mc Callen Park II 3,155.36
$41,629.60
PI O 5/85
n
a
RCA-Incidental Exp. for PW Proj.
September 8, 1992
Page 2
FUNDING SOURCE•
Council approved the appropriation of supplemental expenditures for each of the following
projects from these fiscal accounts:
Project Description Fund
Main Street Scapes Undesigned Gas Tax
Central Library Expansion Undesigned Library Service Fund
Blufftop Landscape V Park Acquisition & Development Fund
Mc Callen Park II Park Acquisition & Development Fund
Funds are currently available in the unappropriated fund balance of each respective fund.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION•
Deny approval of carry over request and forego essential supplemental services or
payment of invoices now on receipt.
ATTACHMENTS
FIS
MTU:LFS:DRN:dw
3309g/8&9
-eLj�T& CITY OF HUNTINMON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUESTED REAPPROPRIATION FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS, FIS 93-10
DATE: AUGUST 5, 1992
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared for
the proposed appropriation totalling $41 ,629 for purposes of carrying forward to
the current Fiscal Year incidental funds required to closeout several major
on-going Public Works projects from FY 191/92.
Upon approval of the City Council , the balance of the unaudited, undesignated
Gas Tax Fund would be reduced by $21 ,474 to $912,000 while that of the Parks,
Acquisition and Development Fund would be reduced by $5,155 to $466,000. The
final requested reappropriation of $15,000 would reduce a balance of the
unaudited, undesignated Library Services Fun -$77 0.
ROB UK-J—. F RAIN
Deputy Cit . Adm nistr (Or
RJF:skd
WPADSERT:1044
' REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
•J� APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
x+,wcrorv.ua+ 9 if — I?a, ls__
Date: September 8, 1992
czm"r r,Lr t;
Submitted to: Honorable ty C
Mayor and Ciouncil T
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
Prepared by: Michael P. Dolder, Fire Chief
Subject: HUNTINGTON BEACH EMEN'S ASSOCIATION CLAIM FOR
FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT REIMBURSEMENT FOR
MANDATORY TRAINING
Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:LQ
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
The Huntington Beach Firemen's Association (HBFA) has submitted a claim for reimbursement of
mandatory training under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The City's analysis of this claim
identifies unpaid training time totaling 1,913 hours at a cost of $35,181.
RECOMMENDATION:
MOTION TO: Authorize additional funds for reimbursing mandatory off-duty training as required by
the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by appropriating $35,181 from the unencumbered General Fund
reserve.
ANALYSIS:
The HBFA has submitted a claim for FLSA reimbursement of mandatory training hours for the
following employee classes and work periods:
Firefighters - January 23, 1989 through January 23, 1991
Fire Controllers - May 13, 1989 through May 13, 1991
The Fire Department required the identified employee classes to complete 1,913 hours of mandatory
training in their off-duty time. However, none of the employees were compensated for the mandatory
training time as required by the FLSA regulations. Since the City did not willingly violate the FLSA
requirements, the City is only liable for a two (2) year retroactive period from the date of notice. Had
the City willingly violated the FLSA requirements, the City would be obligated for a three (3) year
retroactive period plus penalties.
Subsequent to receiving notice of the FLSA violation, the Fire Department's training requirements were
reviewed and appropriately changed to eliminate future unfunded FLSA liabilities. The total training
hours and reimbursement amount of$35,181 includes time for written assignments as well as mandatory
training time. The HBFA's claim also included a compensation request for outside study time of two
Request for City Council Action
HBFD Claim for FLSA for Mandatory Training
September 8, 1992
(2) hours for every hour of classroom time. The basis for the Association's request is a verbal
Department of Labor (DOL) interpretation of "Homework" and a written decision for postal workers.
However, a Department of Labor Wage Hours Opinion letter defining "Homework" as hours worked
has not been issued. FLSA interpretive (written) guidelines found in Thompson Guide, Paragraph 651,
dated March 1989 states that only in-class time is considered time worked and is eligible for
compensation; "Homework" is not considered time worked. The City Attorney's Office also reviewed
the issue of "Homework" and concurs with the Thompson Guide interpretation.
FISCAL BIPACT:
Staff has reviewed the individual hours and employees affected. The associated hours and costs are
summarized in Tables 1 and 2 of the attached spreadsheets, including time for written assignments.
However, the total reimbursement request of$35,181 does not include "Homework" Study Time. The
funding source for reimbursement is from the General Fund reserve.
CONCURRENCE:
The Personnel Director, City Attorney, and Chief of Administrative Services have reviewed the claim
and concur with the recommended action.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Do not fund the retroactive FLSA mandatory training costs. Not funding the FLSA claims willingly
violates the law and subjects the City to a three (3) year liability and penalties.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Table 1 - Firefighter Retroactive FLSA Costs.
2. Table 2 - Fire Controller Retroactive FLSA Costs.
3. Financial Impact Statement.
MTU/MPD/SP/cgs
B:FLSARCA.MFD
TABLE 1
FLSA
TRAINING REPORT
PERSONNEL & CLASSES
JANIIIARY n.IOU TO JAWJMY n. I M
START END MASS Hotms WRITTEN HFURATE CLAW TOTAL
'EMPLOYEE CLASS DATE DATE Hotnts ASSENT TAKEN jaii&ei-- PREM. EXPENSES COST COST
BASS BRIAN Pcm iffim illwol 34 34 0 $18.99 $0-W W428
MA 9117190 90190 40 40 10 $16.99 $0.00 "".50
FP19 lo1ww icvizw 40 40 a $16.89 $o.W $72027 $2.146.08
BRIGGS ARON PC892 l/W lilw 34 84 0 $16.01 $37.60 $581.84 $581.94
COME DON PC882 Wel- 1119191 34 34 0 $16.01 $0.00 $644.34 SS44.84
CHRISTEN STEVE FPlC 4MM 4110MG 40 40 6 $18.79 $105.76 $961.30 $961.80
DALTON TONY 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
DELESKE KEN MA 9/17190 8m190 40 40 10 $16.42 $0.00 $821.00
FP18 lolm 1 Oil Woo 40 1CLASS 32 3 $18.42 $0.00 $674.70 $I.89S.70
DUMAN GARY PC832 imel illeml 34 34 0 $16.01 $37.50 $581.94 $591.94
DUTTON ROBERT FPIA 9117190 90190 40 1CLASS 32 10 $19J)4 $75.16 $074.94
FP18 1 omm 10112f90 40 40 a $19.04 $78.06 $907.3e $1,772.22
ENGDEFtG ERIC FPIC 1211/90 12114190 40 40 0 $21.74 $82.W $961.80 $961.90
FOFtSTER DAN FPIC Wo allow 40 40 0 $16.75 $76.96 $706.96 $708.95
FtJNDEFRW8URK GREG FPIA 9117190 em/w 40 40 10 $1828 $8e.W $1,000.50
FPlB low 1011490 40 40 3 $1820 $W.W $876.04 $I.=."
GAMBOA BRIAN FPIA 8/2m 9/1180 40 40 10 $16.07 $16.40 $818.90
FP18 W em 8122,189 40 40 3 $16.07 $15.40 $706.41 $11.6m.31
GERARDI BRIAN FP18 1011/90 10111/90 40 40 a -----$I$.Ol $66.W $743.43
PC932 imol illow 94 84 0 $18.01 $37.60 $681.84 $1.=%.27
GLENN ROB MA UNK. 21M 40 40----10 $16.68 $0.00 $781.60
FP18 UNK. WN 40 40 3 $16.75 $0.00 s6n.25
FPIC 112ZW iram 40 40 0 $ism Y^ $0.00 $66120 $2.119.96
GRUBER ---.CFF#S MA ---wam 9/1189 40 40 10 $1623 $66.25 $827.76
FP18 9/180 9mm 40 MASSES 24 4-3 $16.07 $63.16 $497.04
FPlC 1122190 ir2m 40 40 0 $16.63 $64.50 $726.70 $2.060.49
KORSIAK ROGER PC892 1m91 1119m1 34 34 -0 $16.01 $o.W $644.34 $544.84 t"
LIGHT KENT FPIA W"l all"i 40 40 -.10 $16.011 $126.28 M.78
FP18 4091 6121i91 40 40 a $16.011 $128.28, $814.711 $1.741.49
FLSATRN3XLS 81M
f
START END CLASS HOURS WRnTEN MITE OTHER CLASS TOTAL
EMPLOYEE CLASS DATE DATE HOURS ABSENT TAKEN ASSNUINTS PREY. E>a3ENSE3 COST COST
MOSES SAM FP1A 8/2m 911189 40 _ 40 10 $16.48 $0.00 $824.00
FP19 9140 912W 40 40 8 $16.46 $0.00 $709.04
FP1C 1122M 1120M 40 40 0 $1720 $0.00 $716.80 $2.240.24
NELSON MARK PC882 115191 111IIr91 34 34 0 $18.00 $87.50 $811.76
FP1A 112a191 8118191 40 40 10 $lam $102.52 $947.02
FP18 418191 S1P2191 40 40 8 $1620 $107-62 $828.79 $2.WY.57
PERRY MICE PC882 115191 1119191 84 84 0 $16.01 $37.50 $501.94 SM."
REARDON BILL FP1A 9117190 9121190 40 40 10 $20.09 $5200 $1.058.60
FP18 1018192 10►12192 40 40 8 $20A9 $6Z00 $916.87 $1.972.87
SHEAN LEON 0 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
SMITH TOW PC882 115191 1119191 84 34 0 $18A1 $0.00 $U4.34
FP1A 1130191 8120191 40 40 10 $18.01 $0.00 $800.60 $1.844."
STOCKING RON 0 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
THOMPSON RON FP1A 9117180 9121190 40 40 10 $1820 $62-00 $886.60
F918 10191w 10►12190 40 40 8 $16.89 $61.00 $777.27 _$1.M.77
VOSS RENE FPiC 1rzm 1129190 40 40 0 $18b3 $0.00 $W.20 S867.20
TOTALS:
EMPLOYEES 26
TOTAL HOURS (INCLUDING WRITTEN ASSIGNMENTS) 1.768
TOTAL COST $31.684.04
N
1
v
FLSATRN3.XLS 8092
TABLE 2
R FLSA TRAINING REPORT
FIRE CONTROLLERS
May 13, 1989 through May 23, 1991
START END CLASS AEG. UNPAID I WRTN HRARATE OTHER VAC.
EMPLOYEE CLASS DATE DATE HOURS SCHED. HOURS ASSNMNTS PREM. EXPENSE* LEAVE SX SPB COST
HATHAWAY Doug EWrl-Al 6flOW1 Qt4W 12 0 12 0 $20.07 $188.19 $429.07
SHOUP KdwEMT 1-A __1,j22�9t __5t28j81-- 168 __ 20 188 _--°_-- --____-- 888.77 $8,087.02
PAY RATS 1I 86 18-- -72-- ;20.01
�PAY RATE 2 �__ 4 81 521.11
TOTAL
EMPLOYEES 2 *Includes lab coats,books,registmtion,milage,etc.
TOTAL HOME 146
UNCUMM WRITTEN A". GWAENTSj
TOTAL COST $3,496.89
H
N
I
r
N
8092-313flsa.xls
ATTACHMENT 3
0��"fe CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUESTED FUNDING FOR CITY REIMBURSEMENT OF OFF—DUTY MANDATORY
TRAINING, FIS 93-13
DATE: AUGUST 19, 1992
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared for
the proposed appropriation of $35,181 to reimburse the Huntington Beach
Firemen' s Association for mandatory off—duty training, as required under the
Fair Labor Standards Act.
Upon approval of the City Council , the balance of the unaudited, undesignated
General Fund would be reduced to $3,865,000.
IFRI_ NZ '
Deputy City ministrato
WPADSERT:1063
RCA - ROUTING SHEET/CHECKLIST
INITIATING DEPARTMENT FIRE DATE August 26, 1992
SUBJECT HUNTINGTTON BEACH FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION CLAIM FOR FAIR LABOR STANDARDS
AGENDA DATE September 8, 1992 AGENDA DEADLINE August 26, 1992
(TO ADMINISTRATION)
YES NO
PUBLIC HEARING [ ] [ XX] PUBLICATION DATE
(Most FEES require a Public Hearing. .Seek the City Attorneys advice on fees.)
DATE TO CITY ATTORNEY not::apblicable City Attorney
(with Exhibits) (Initial when complete)
INITIATING DEPARTMENT REVIEW/CHECKLIST
REQUIRED BACKUP YES NO CHECK BELOW IF ATTACHED
ordinance ( ] >Q [ ]
Resolution ( ] P< [ l
signed Contract/Agreement [ ] [Xj [ ]
Negative Dec./EIR
Insurance
Bond/s
Map/s
Financial Impact statement 9q ( ] (X]
(Unbudgeted Items Over $10,000)
RCA - City Council
RCA - Redevelopment Agency [ ] [}Q [ ]
REVIEWED BY INITIATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA COORDINATOR: fJCw/L
ADMINISTRATION REVIEW [ ]
COMMENTS:
PUBLIC HEARING Public Hearings are required on many
development issues and most fees. If
you need clarification on the need for
a Public Hearing include a request for
advice in your Request for Legal
Serivice (RLS) .
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION To add to or amend the City Code,
departments must submit a RLS
describing the desired revision so that
it can be put in proper ordinance or
resolution form and reviewed for any
legal concerns.
An ordinance or resolution is also
needed to establish a new fee or revise
an existing fee. An RLS should be
submitted to the City Attorney for
these as well.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT All contracts/agreements must be
submitted to the City Attorney Office
for review and approval. With few
exceptions, the City Attorney requires
two signature by the contractor before
final approval can be given.
NEGATIVE DEC./EIR All projects within the City require
either a Negative Declaration or an
Environmental Impact Report(EIR) .
Community Development staff should be
consulted as to which is needed.
INSURANCE Proof of insurance is usually required
of contractors with the city as well as
companies doing work in a city right-
of-way. Seek advice via your RLS if
you are unsure.
BONDS Are required of contractors with the
City and developers. Again, as part
of your RLS you can seek advice on the
need for bonds.
MAPS Maps should be attached to identify the
location of all projects or tracts.
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION row. s�•�..
Date August 17 , 1992
Submitted to: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by:
Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator -
Prepared by: Ron Hagan, Director, Community Services
Subject: REPLACEMENT FOR DEMOLISHED PICK UP #5274
APPROVED BY CITY COT.14C,L1-
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exceptio
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative A en
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
There is a need to replace a pick up truck used by the beach parking
operation that was recently involved in an accident.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve an allocation of $14, 500 from the Equipment Replacement Fund
to replace pick up #5274.
ANALYSIS
On July 27, 1992 , the police were in pursuit of an underaged
individual on a joy ride in a borrowed car. The individual lost
control of the vehicle on Pacific Coast Highway, slammed through the
fence at Vincent G. Moorhouse Lifeguard Headquarters, and landed on
two vehicles (employee's private car and city pick up #5274) ,
demolishing both. The pick up has been examined by the automotive
section of Public Works and it is deemed to be totaled or beyond
repair at a reasonable cost (see attached memo) .
The city is endeavoring to extract reimbursement from the owner of the
vehicle for the truck and twenty-five feet of damaged fence ($1, 200
plus labor) . The fence has been repaired by Beach Maintenance with
existing operating funds. However, the truck is needed on a daily
basis by the Beach Division of the Community Services Department. The
possibility of a temporary replacement pick up was explored through
this department and Public Works, but no loaner is available;
therefore, an allocation of $14,500 from the Equipment Replacement
Fund is requested.
-a�
P10 5/85
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION PAGE TWO
FUNDING SOURCE
Equipment Replacement Fund
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Designate an alternative funding source such as the General Fund
Unappropriated Fund Balance.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Public Works Report regarding Vehicle #5274.
RH:JBE:am
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To JIM ENGLE From DEL GRAY
SUPERINTENDENT SUPV VECH MNT
Subject VEHICLE #5274 Date AUGUST 5, 1992
The above subject vehicle, which was towed to the vehicle
maintenance body shop for evaluation of collision damage has
been determined to be a total loss.
The estimated cost of repairs, $9000, exceeds the blue book
value of the vehicle, $8050. Therefore it is economically
unfeasible to repair the unit.
The recommended action in this situation is:
1. Do not repair the vehicle.
2 . File a legal claim against the second party involved in
the collision for recovery of the value of the city
vehicle.
3 . Initiate an RCA requesting funding for a replacement
vehicle.
DG:bu
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUESTED FUNDING FOR REPLACEMENT OF DEMOLISHED PICKUP TRUCK,
FIS 93-12
DATE: AUGUST 6, 1992
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared for
the proposed appropriation of $14,500 for purposes of replacing a pickup truck
used by the Beach Parking Operation that was recently involved in an accident.
Upon approval of the City Council , the cash bala of th unau ited,
undesignated Equipment Replacement Fund will b red ced $3, 29,
ROBERT . Z
Deputy City Mministrat
RJF:skd
WPADSERT:1044
RCA - ROUTING SHEET/CHECKLIST
INITIATING DEPARTMENT DATE
SUBJECT
A&�A,—"— '97
AGENDA DATE AGENDA�Gl AGENDA DEADLINE
(TO MI ISTRATION)
YES NO
PUBLIC HEARING [ ] [ ] PUBLICATION DATE
(Most FEES require a Public Hearing. Seek the City Attorneys advice on fees.)
DATE TO CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney
(With Exhibits) (Initial when complete)
INITIATING DEPARTMENT REVIEW/CHECKLIST
REQUIRED BACKUP YES NO CHECK BELOW IF ATTACHED
ordinance
Resolution j ] [✓] [ ]
Signed Contract/Agreement [ ] lv [ ]
Negative Dec./EIR [ ] 1V4 [ ]
Insurance [ ] lv� [ ]
Bond/s [ ] (✓] [ 7
Map/s [ ] [✓ J/ [ ]
Financial Impact Statement [ ] (✓l ( ]
(Unbudgeted Items over $10,000)
RCA - City Council (/] ( ]
RCA - Redevelopment Agency j ] [/ [ ]
REVIEWED BY INITIATING DEPARTMENT AGENDA COORDINATOR:
ADMINISTRATION REVIEW [ ]
C0N4=S:
PUBLIC HEARING Public Hearings are required on many
development issues and most fees. If
you need clarification on the need for
a Public Hearing include a request for
advice in your Request for Legal
Serivice (RLS) -
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION To add to or amend the City Code,
departments must submit a RLS
describing the desired revision so that
it can be put in proper ordinance or
resolution form and reviewed for any
legal concerns.
An ordinance or resolution is also
needed to establish a new fee or revise
an existing fee. An RLS should be
submitted to the City Attorney for
these as well.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT All contracts/agreements must be
submitted to the City Attorney Office
for review and approval. With few
exceptions, the City Attorney requires
two signature$by the contractor before
final approval can be given.
NEGATIVE DEC./EIR All projects within the City require
either a Negative Declaration or an
Environmental Impact Report(EIR) .
Community Development staff should be
consulted as to which is needed.
INSURANCE Proof of insurance is usually required
of contractors with the city as well as
companies doing work in a city right-
of-way. Seek advice via your RLS if
you are unsure.
BONDS Are required of contractors with the
City and developers. Again, as part
of your RLS you can seek advice on the
need for bonds.
MAPS Maps should be attached to identify the
location of all projects or tracts.
s a 7/ /
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date 7/6/92
Submitted to: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL
Submitted by: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Admi ni strator6w,
COUNCIL '
Prepared by: RONALD E. LOWENBERG, Chief of Police APPROVED BY CITY
Subject: EXPANSION OF POLICE PARKING LOT 7� 19.�e?-
_ GITY CLE� ;
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The police building and parking area are nearing 20 years of use. During that period,
the police fleet has outgrown the existing parking area. Additionally, the construction
of the residences at the south end of the Civic Center has caused security problems for
police vehicles due to gate and fencing realignments.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the expansion of the police parking lot, which will add 26 parking spaces on
the west side of the existing lot with no loss of existing trees, per attached drawing.
2. Approve appropriation of $48,527 from the fund balance, Capital Improvements Project
Fund.
ANALYSIS
For the last several years, to obtain sufficient parking for police vehicles, the police
department has taken spots in the upper parking lot that used to be available for the
general public. When construction began on the residential area on the south side of the
Civic Center, the police security gate was removed and never replaced. The security
fence was re-configured, and there has been no security for police vehicles for several
years. The approval of this project will add 26 parking spaces and allow us to secure
the lower lot. A meeting with a representative of the residents south of the Civic
Center has resulted in a plan that is acceptable to all parties, does not require any
tree removal , and meets the conditions set out in the Planning Commission's approval of
this project. See attached map for details.
FUNDING SOURCE
Fund balance, Capital Improvements Project Funds.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Deny the request. The result would be a continuing lack of security and lack of space
for police vehicles and public parking.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Cost breakdown.
2. Map
.... .. ,.. ._,.___�.a.;........�__..,.. ::..t-.,......._....,.,..c. _.,._.J..,......,.......,...._.._.....,..W_....n..,.. .,,.....E.:�^.s.3a:,s::.G.::ar:.....4_.... _.s a', '.:;:.x,...::v<s:�s..iszw;:ss.::i'aK`•"�:»�mx ��_r"'xt,„..� ,,r,;,'. _ ...'.er.s.:it.`tit;.mY
I
f .
ESTIMATE FOR PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION
AREA 66 ' X 3_50 ' = 9, 900 SQ. FEET
1 . Excavation/Grading 9 , 900 x $22 . 50 $ 6 , 218 . 18
2 . Asphalt Concrete ( 9 , 900x . 25x144 ) $42 . 50 7 , 727 . 72
000
3 . Aggregate Base ( 9 , 900x . 50x144 ) $15 . 50 5 , 636 . 36
2 , 000
4 .. Curb and Gutter 256 feet $15 . 00 3 , 840 . 00
5 . Striping 1 , 000 . 00
6 . Block Wall 36 ' x 3 ' 900 . 00
7 . Fence Chain Link 6 , 970 . 00
Take Down Reuse Existing Fence
City to remove vines from existing fence
8 . Fence Chain Link East side of dri�-e�vay 3 , 835 . 00
Sub total 36 , 127 . 26
9 . Gate Control Wire and intercom to gate $1. , 200 - 6 ,.400 . 00
TOTAL $42 , 527 . 26
Not included wheelstops and landscaping or removal of existing
trees or excess dirt and concrete .
Street lights to be relocated along the driveway which runs in the
north/south direction .
VSE y c c
26 cp4 /4Z I
r-e--S RECEIVED
N 0 LOSS of
MAR 11 1992
Dept. of Comm. Development
t r-j
ti goc
d
z .s, -
q
r H
' CITY,-OV HUN t'INGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To : George Abbond, P.D. From Doug Kato
General &srvices Officer Prircipal Engineer/Design
Subject • POLICE DEPAF'E1= Date : August 28, 1991
PARKING EXPANS-LO N
After walking the site and meeting with you on Aucrust 26, 1991, I have
the scope of the project as follows: Construction of a 9,900 s.f. parking
lot, construction of block wall and chain link fence, and extension of
gate control and intercom wiring.
You have asked if Public works can do the design, or do we recommend that
a consultant do the design. At the presert time, we do not have the man-
power to do the design; also, based on Item #21, on Page 548 of the 1991/
92 Prelimnary Budget, the pro,ect h«s not been funded
If funding becoires availabJe, I estimate that the engineering can be ac-
complished for $6,000.
DK ik
Fei,
j CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHINTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
MN BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FUNDING TO ACCQM40DATE THE EXPANSION OF THE POLICE
PARKING LOT, FIS 92-17
DATE: JUNE 23, 1992
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared for
the proposed appropriation of $48,527 to accommodate the expansion of the Police
Parking Lot.
Upon approval of the City Council , the balan of t e un ignated, unresery
Capital Improvement Fund would be reduced 1 ,26 ,
R T J. Z
Deputy C y A mi istrator
RJF:sd
WPADSERT:977
RCA - ROUTING SHEET/CHECKLIST
INITIATING DEPARTMENT POLICE DATE 6/18192
SUBJECT EXPANSION OF POLICE PARKING LOT
AGENDA DATE 7/6/92 AGENDA DEADLINE 6/24/92
(TO ADMINISTRATION)
YES NO
PUBLIC HEARING [ ] [ X ] PUBLICATION DATE
(Most FEES require a Public Hearing. Seek the City Attorneys advice on fees.)
DATE TO CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney
(with Exhibits) (Initial when complete)
INITIATING DEPARTMENT REVIEW/CHECKLIST
REQUIRED BACKUP YES NO CHECK BELOW IF ATTACHED
ordinance [ ] [v� [ ]
Resolution
Signed Contract/Agreement
Negative Dec./EIR
Insurance
Bond/s
Map/s
Financial Impact Statement
(Unbudgeted Items over $10,000) j
RCA - City Council [✓]/ [ ] [
RCA - Redevelopment Agency
REVIEWED BY INITIATING DE TMENT AGENDA COORDINATOR:
. Police
ADMINISTRATION REVIEW ]
COMMENTS:
PUBLIC HEARING Public Hearings are required on many
development issues and most fees. If
you need clarification on the need for
a Public Hearing include a request for
advice in your Request for Legal
Serivice (RLS) .
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION To add to or amend the City Code,
departments must submit a RLS
describing the desired revision so that
it can be put in proper ordinance or
resolution form and reviewed for any
legal concerns.
An ordinance or resolution is also
needed to establish a new fee or revise
an existing fee. An RLS should be
submitted to the City Attorney for
these as well.
CONTRACT/AGREEMENT All contracts/agreements must be
submitted to the City Attorney Office
for review and approval. With few
exceptions, the City Attorney requires
two signature by the contractor before
final approval can be given.
NEGATIVE DEC./EIR All projects within the City require
either a Negative Declaration or an
Environmental Impact Report(EIR) .
Community Development staff should be
consulted as to which is needed.
INSURANCE Proof of insurance is usually required
of contractors with the city as well as
companies doing work in a city right-
of-way. Seek advice via your RLS if
you are unsure.
BONDS Are required of contractors with the
City and developers. Again, as part
of your RLS you can seek advice on the
need for bonds.
MAPS Maps should be attached to identify the
location of all projects or tracts.
•
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
VIM
1MJN7M110N"'�' Date: June 1. 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
Prepared by: Michael P. Dolder, Fire Chief 6
Subject: FUNDING REQUEST FOR OIL WELL REPAIR ' C4' —
Consistent with Council Policy? [x] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception CITY
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
The City of Huntington Beach currently owns and operates three oil wells on Civic Center property. Civic
Center oil well #2 required emergency repairs costing $6,900 which were completed May 5, 1992.
RECOMMENDATION:
Appropriate $6,900 for emergency repairs to Civic Center oil well #2.
ANALYSIS:
The City of Huntington Beach averages approximately $7,000 a month in revenue from oil well #2. This
contributes to the City's total yearly average gross oil income of$225,000; estimate at current oil prices. Since
a non-producing well produces no revenues, the Fire Department authorized an emergency repair of oil well
#2 which was completed on May 5, 1992. During the interim, well repairs were charged to another Fire
Department account. The Fire Department is requesting that a General Fund appropriation be made into
account #E-AA-FR-309-4-43-00 where the funds were dispersed from.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Unappropriated funds from the General Fund account in the amount of $6,900.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Do not appropriate the funds.
ATTACHMENTS:
Financial Impact Statement
MTU/MPD/RG/sr
b:oilwell.rca
Hej
' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION FOR OIL WELL REPAIRS, FIS 92-14
DATE: MAY 20, 1992
As required under the authority of Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement
has been prepared and submitted relative to oil well repairs. Anticipations
are that an appropriation of $6,900 would be adequate for t purpose.
Upon approval of the City Council , the balance the un s Hated , unreserved
General Fund would be reduced to $4,066,000 '
kORPTY J F NZ
Deputy City Administrator
RJF:skd
WPADSERT:918
RCA - ROUTING SHEET/CHECKLIST
WHITE - REMAINS WITH RCA
GREEN - ADMINISTRATION COPY
CANARY - CITY ATTORNEY'S COPY
PINK - CITY CLERK'S COPY
GOLD - DEPARTMENT COPY
INITIATING DEPARTMENT FIRE DATE 5/20/92
SUBJECT FUNDING REQUEST FOR OIL WELL REPAIR
MEETING DATE 6/l/92 AGENDA DEADLINE 5/20/92
(TO ADMINISTRATION)
YES NO
PUBLIC NOTICE [ ] [x] PUBLICATION DATE
LEGAL DEPARTMENT(With Exhibits)
Date In Date Out
INITIATING DEPARTMENT REVIEW/CHECKLIST:
YES NO N/A
[ ] [ ] [X] Ordinance [ ] Exhibit 1
[ ] [ ] [X] Resolution [ ] Exhibit 2
[ ] [X] [ ] signed Contract [ ] Exhibit 3
[ ] [X] [ ] signed Agreement [ ] Exhibit 4
[ ] [X] [ ] Neg. Dec/EIR
[ ] [X] [ ] Insurance Required Additional [ ]
Exhibits Nbr.
[ ] [X] [ ] Bonds Required
IX] [ ] [ ] Financial Impact Statement
(Unbudgeted Items over $1,000)
[X] [ ] [ ] RCA - City Council
[ ] [X] [ ] RCA - Redevelopment Agency
INITIATING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL BY:j j1Ge4tZ----
[ ] ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
[ ] CITY CLERK FOR AGENDA
COMMENTS:
a
- REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date
Submitted to Honorable Mayor and City Council //,��
Submitted by Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administra / "�
Prepared by Richard Barnard, Deputy City Administrator"�F
Subject APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR HBTV CHANNEL 3
APPILOVED BY CITY COUNC
.sue l8 i9� I
Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exce tion jj
I
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternat ve Act ns.Attachmexn c
Statement of Issue:
The Video Unit Temporary Salaries Account is depleted and additional funds are needed to
take us to June 30, 1992, the end of the 1991/92 fiscal year
Recommendation:
Authorize the appropriation of $15,000 from the Cable Fund Unappropriated Fund balance
into the Video Unit Temporary Salaries Account.
Analysis:
The 1991/92 budget for the city's Video Unit is derived from 2 percent of the 5 percent
franchise fee that is collected from Paragon Cable Company The staff recommended and
the Council approved an appropriation in the 1991/92 budget of $25,000 for temporary
salaries, while at the same time budgeting 8 part-time camera operators. In July 1991,
the Video Unit undertook an ambitious production schedule which included the addition of
two new HBTV-3 weekly programs, the Community Services Report (CSR) and the
Huntington Beach News. While both programs have been very successful toward informing
the citizens of a variety of activities in the city, the budget that was presented at the
beginning of 1991/92 fiscal year was woefully inadequate to fund the increase production
schedule.
The city's Cable Fund is a separate city fund and is not part of the city's General Fund
The 2 percent of the revenues derived from the 5 percent cable franchise fee is designated
specifically for the HBTV-3 government access channel. There are currently funds
available in the Cable Unappropriated Fund balance. Staff is requesting that $15,000 from
the Unappropriated Fund balance be appropriated for the remainder of this fiscal year
1991/92 which will allow HBTV-3 production to continue. The city has an unusually busy
schedule of community events planned during the months of June and July It is important
that HBTV-3 be in production not only to cover the scheduled events but also to promote
the upcoming events to the citizens within our viewing area. Upcoming events include the
4th of July Parade, OP Surf Contest, Battle of the Surf Bands, Pierfest 92, and the grand
opening of the Huntington Beach Pier. Approval of the requested appropriation will insure
that these and other community events are covered on HBTV-3.
Pio 5/85
HBTV Channel 3 RCA
May 7, 1992
Page -2-
The 1992/93 Budget document will provide for adequate funds for the next year to insure
that a similar shortfall does not occur
Funding Source:
The Cable Television unappropriated Fund Balance
Alternatives:
1. Provide an amount less than the requested $15,000 and direct that the Video Unit
significantly reduce its productions.
2. Not approve the request for an additional appropriation of funds and direct that no new
productions be undertaken between now and the end of the fiscal year.
Attachment:
1. Fiscal Impact Statement.
MTU:RB:paj
1
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, DEPUTY CITY ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION TO COVER ANTICIPATED CASH
SHORTFALL IN VIDEO UNIT BUDGET F.I.S. 92-12
DATE: MAY 8, 1992
As required by Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement has been prepared for
the proposed appropriation of $15,000 to accommodate Video Unit Temporary
Salaries through the remainder of the current Fiscal Year.
Upon approval of the City Council , the balance of the undesignated, unreserved
Public Communications Fund would be reduced to $$3363,000.
ROBERT J. FRANZ
Deputy City Administrator
RJF:bpo
PADSERT:901
f
F IT COUNCILACTION
REQUEST OR CITY COU C
Date Aril 20, 1992
Submitted to The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Submitted by Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administr
Prepared by Ron Hagan, Director, Community icesge
Ron Lowenberg, Chief of Police
Subject CITY FUNDING OF PRODUCTION "A TE AGER "
'Rb�ED BY CITY COUNCIL
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative A hments
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
S.P.S. Theatrical Productions is requesting $7, 400 to produce and
present "A Teenager Is at city locations again this summer.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the expenditure and transfer of $7, 400 from the Asset
Forfeiture Fund ($3, 700) and the Summer Recreation Playground Programs
( $3,700) into Account 381 593 to produce and present "A Teenager
Is . . . " to the community at city locations this summer.
ANAL
Last summer, the city funded the production of "A Teenager Is . "
at three locations, the lawn area adjacent to the Main Street Branch
Library, Central Park amphitheater, and Murdy Community Park. It was a
very successful program that drew well over 5, 000 teenagers and
adults. "A Teenager Is . . . " is a play that was written by a local
Huntington Beach teenager and it has a strong anti-drug, positive
self-esteem message for teens and parents alike. Each scene speaks to
topics of today and the relationships between teenagers, parents and
their community.
The play is produced by Steven Schwartz , Huntington Beach resident and
Arts Administrator for the Huntington Beach Union High School
District. Mr. Schwartz is requesting funding to do the play again
this summer from June 17 through August 5 . Performances would be held
on Wednesdays beginning at 6 : 00 p.m. at locations to be selected by
the city. Attached is Mr. Schwartz ' proposal and information about "A
Teenager Is "
FUNDING_—EURCE.
Asset Forfeiture Fund
Summer Recreation Playground Programs
PI O 5/85
r
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION April 20, 1992
Page two
ALTERNATIVES
Do not fund the play "A Teenager Is and do not offer this
activity to the community this summer.
ATTACHMENTS
Proposal
RH:cs
.,,.f Fes_
r �v
T4eenager
lip-
„�I I
4
1 .
A TEENAGER IS...
PRESENTED BY
S. P. S. THEATRICAL PRODUCTIONS
STEVEN PAUL SCHWARTZ, PRODUCER
7206 HAVENROCK DR.
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648
(714) 969-2712
BUD_
Administration costs
Secretary (part time) $ 400
Phone $ 100
Reprographics $ 75
Audit fee $ 300
Postage $ 75
Office supplies $ 100
Sub Total _N_$1,050.00
Production Costs
Fees
Producer $1,600
Director $1,400
Production Stage Manager $ 700
8 ACTORS($2 00/actor) $1 ,600
Sub Total $5,300.00
Props $ 100
Rehearsal Hall Rental $ 125
Transportation $ 50
Royalities($50/) $ 200
Make up $ 50
scripts $ 75
Sub Total $ 600.00
Total Ext)enditure $ 6,950.00
2. Last year's performances in the amphitheatre at Central Park where
highly successful. Each performance the audience grew. Performing in
one location will assit in building an audience.
One site location performances could be on Sunday's .
Suggested performances begining on June 21, 28, July 5 (4th of July
Weekend) or12, and 12 or 19. Total of 4 Sundays with two performances:
1 p.m. and 2:30p.m.
An advanced advertising program with posters and flyers placed in
community centers and in merchants windows; use of HBTV-3 soapbox and
message board, newspaper releases and feature articles will assist in
informing an audience of the free performances.
PROPOSAL FOR SUMMER PROGRAM
TEENAGER IS...
A Teenager Is... a play written by local Huntington Beach teenagers in
1989, has a strong anti- drug, positive self- esteem message for
teens and parents a like. Each scene speaks to current concerns of
teenagers, parents and community leaders. The style and structure of the
program allows for flexibility in staging, and length. Since the first
performance of A Teenager is..., we have performed for well over
5,000 teenagers and adults. The program has been aired on Paragon
Cable. This program has been endorsed by Project NODS (No On Drugs
in Schools), the California State Department of Criminal Justice
Planning, The National Organization of Parents for a Drug Free
Youth, and the Orange County Department of Education.
We are now interested in communicating these important messages more
directly to parents and teens in Huntington Beach. We propose to do eight
performances for the city of Huntington Beach.
This program was presented in three locations in Huntington Beach during
the summer of 1991. Funding was provided by "Drug Confiscation money"
and the Department of Community Services. The city has received many
requests from the community for the program to be repeated.
Performance Options
1 . The performances would be located in a different site each week. The
showmobile ( a large portable stage) will be located in a park or school
area in the City of Huntington Beach. Performances would be held on
Wednesday evenings. Length of performance approximately one hour.
Recommended starting time 6:30 p.m.
Suggested performance dates: June 17, 1992 through August 5 1992.
I
� l i -
� 77
lot
AT
\ yy 1
q
,R
ANOTHER CHANCE TO
SEE " A TEENAGER IS"
by Debbie Grant
��.�
Preforming "A teenager Is" (from I_ to R) Penelope Pauley,
Jill Marx, Nicole Kelly, Ted Apodaca and Kymberly Nicole Walton
(Center stage)Jennifer Satler and Dune Pauley
If you mused "A Teenager Is" Then there is the City of Hunt-
last weekend, they ate giving you ington Beach-Community Services
another chance this weekend and Police Departments, and
Both Saturday and Sunday the Micheal Mudd, Cultural Affairs
play will be presented at 1 00 and ,Manager who brought the City
again 3 00 p in in the Central Park Thanks to the owners of OCEAN
Amphitheatre North Library PACIFIC MARKET, located at
All the performances are free, 301 17th Street in Huntington
i however it isn't recommended for Beach and also to ZACK'S on the
younger audiences beach (Beach Blvd and PCH) the
The play is actually scenes and cast and stage hands have been
monologues depicting several treated to some excellent food be-
aqpects of a teen's life It shows fore the performances
some of the things they must deal Then of course there is the cast,
with in today's society such as Ted Apodaca, Nicole Kelly, Greg
hone life,drugs, peed pressure and Marrero, Jill Marx, Margaret
how a teenager copes with those McGurr, Dune Pauley, Penelope
pressures Paulcy, Jennifer Satler, and Kym-
However, this isn't Just a play, it berly Nicole Walton
represents what can be "A Teenager Is" is the beginning
accomplished when members of a of what hopes to be an annual event
community get together in Huntington Beach, thanks to the
Steven Schwartz, the pro- efforts of many people who care in
ducer/director of the piny has pulled our city
all the efforts togcthu See Opinions...page 3
f
s 3 E
cj y; s
�y
4+44, rvecne a4ay,May 24-rhuraday,"2S,1969 The orange County Flegmllw3
Manna production confronts issues
sy Ann Pqnm Pa o� dees of the abortion issue
um
�1e ' ii It often stakes home to am presented But the boy taalsts
HUNTINGTON BEACH — The them The counselors are he wants to marry h1s gulnend
word-of-mouth popularity of a there if the students want and cares enough to do anything to
straight-talking play wntten by 20 to talk Of convince her
area high-selml stutaents has Steve "Enough to give up this?" she
Schv"wtmoroLght it before adui:crefererces Manna High School theater teacher asks,
him back the vial of
and student assemblies Cirnugrout cocaine
Southern Caliiornta over the past "There is no prescbmg,"
1b manths for the freeform play last year Schwartz said "Some of the sto-
The Marina H.Lgh :.,hool ad l e whilooking for away m eticour- nes even include humor The stu-
vanced theater class's "A Teen- age theater students to en as dents wrote it and it speaks dwect-
agrr Is " deals with !+e tough well as act To start un young ly LO their � I think that's the
sub)ects of growing up n the late real secre of its sio=iiii
playwrights off be askrd them to t
1980s—drug abuse, AIDS, paren- fiiush tbur sentences "When I'm Students seeing the play often
• tal alcotiolism relationships, lane- l , I will open up for the f4t'st time About
alone I , Sometimes I fee
liness — whatever the student wish I could > and es feel
is annular issues that are part of their
playwrights have on their minds own lives, Schwartz said
"Every tame we perform the H,.s students took the idea and The 90-minute play has been per-
play we get more requests to per- wrote with it As the play evolved, formed before the State Crimmal
form
are ti At this point we've got the students decuW that thole Jul Planemg C�rtsee�encr
F m regnests than we can accom- serttenees would with doe and do natimal r[par-
modate, said Steve Schwartz,the mood and warn. wildentsods Me a Dn6 Ftes'Yaath,bout m
students' teacher performing the role EveotuaIIy, Costa Mom It also tins bem per-
The play's honesty and frank the a elm formed a kind of formed befam rational ooatbe�
handluig of difficult, emotional cnorus between scenes such as one ences on low-ap alcohol and drug
subjects account for much of its where a girl tells her boyfriend she abuse in Santa Batbam sad nu-
popularity, Schwartz said Cam- wants to speak with him Mer nhi��-tCbooi gat mings
selors are always present when the The boy jumps to the ci:iinclusian Rooeea Gbie SyA9ms, the area
play is performed before young that his gwWriead wants to break cabiWIT slR+mi. videotaped it
• people, be sad up Instead,she ooralraeu him wM and his shown it several time.
"It often stakes home to them," his cocaine use-He says it is no ft AN11119 nerd screeamgs of "A
he said "The counselors are there deal Tben she reveals she is prow Teenaearls. "wM be SatmUay at
If the students want to talk " nant He im 10 pm-. Wednesday at " p m
= Schwartz came up with the idea marriage, but she refuses and and June 3 and 12 at 10 p m
1
A '
• STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKME,JIAN,Governor
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING
1130 K STREET,SUITE 300 -.
SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 95814
March 3, 1989
Marina High School Theatre Troupe
c/o: Mr. Steve Schwartz t
Huntington Beach Unified High School District
10251 Yorktown Avenue
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
Dear Mr. Schwartz:
Please thank all of the members of the Marina High School Theatre Troupe for
presenting " A Teenager Is. . ." at our combined Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency and Drug Suppression in the Schools Training Conference at the
Westin South Coast Plaza Hotel in Costa Mesa, February 22nd and 23rd:
A vast majority of the attendees indicated that they found the troupe's
performance entertaining, meaningful and very professionally presented. The
troupe is composed of a very talented group of individuals. We wish' each one-
of them a future full of successi
Your participation was a major contribution to the success of our training
conference. I am looking forward to our next opportunity to work together.
Sincerely,
CHERIE L. McKONE, Chief WILLIAM T. DEGUCHI, Chief
Crime Prevention Branch Juvenile Justice ,Bran6h
3
L
•
x
s
S
k
Fj
March of Dimes
Birth Defects Foundation
Orange County Chapter
661 Hamilton Street #650
P 0 Box 3980
Costa Mesa California 92628 3980
714 631 8700
March 7, 1989
Steven Schwartz
"A Teenager Is. . ."
10251 Yorktown Avenue
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
Dear Steve:
We on the Chain Reaction Leadership Council want to thank you for
a superb performance!
While your students were on stage you could have heard a pin drop.
The stories that unfolded were ones that our audience could truly
relate to, and did!
You have a fantastic crew of actors and we wish you the best with
your continued endeavor.
Thank you again for your support and participation in our "Power of
Choice" youth health conference.
Since'pely,
Shannon Wolff Sandi Ames
Community Services Assistant Special Events Coordinator
Sophmore, Mater Dei High School
SW/SA:jc
HUNTINGTON
Youth Shelter
17011 Beach Blvd Charter Centre•Suite 837
Huntington Beach•California 92647
(714)843.4417
Nov. 3, 1989
Mr. Steve Schwartz
Drama Dept.
Marina High School
Springdale Ave
Huntington Beach, CA
Dear Mr. Schwartz,
On behalf of our Board of Directors and friends of the Huntington
Youth Shelter, I would like to thank you and your students for the
wonderful, special presentation of "A Teenager Is".
As I am sure you could tell from the very positive response, the
audience was extremely pleased and captivated by the production. You
have certainly provided your students with a much needed forum for their
expression.
Since our goals of helping children are similar, I am sure we shall
all have the opportunity to meet again.
Thank you again for providing the Huntington Youth Shelter Board with
this opportunity.
Very truly yours,
4:�
rol Kanode
President
,� •Eu•iR�' hF S
W NEWSLETTER
• J p
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING
�*'�IIFONN Providing Support to Criminal Justice Agencies,Victim
Service Organizations and Crime Prevention Programs
Volume 4,Number 2 Summer 1"9
' Highlight from OCJP
I This Issue
. Teen Advisors Help At-Risk Teenagers Act Out -Hard Hitting Issues
Peers
• California Dru&Cmg Programs
to be Nation-wide Models
• Ontario Police Department
Becomes Movie Stars z
• Gang Violence Programs Expand
to More California Counties
,Additional Federal Grants i
Welcomed to Anti-Drug Fight
CODAP Program improves Case -
�:_Fwcessing _
C-CAP Program Changes PD
Drastically
AFP Sdwbk&Meetings
;+bC?P Canbnues 3teorganizatiaQt �; - . ,�-
. -
IDC.IP FMpioy+ee cf dw.QuaQter
` .Albeit Hsimstein,Jr.
. :.�'2Esecttdve Director
gamma Clan The Marina High School drama class takes a breather from a hectic schedule of
f D�patj�Ti)ir�tar ; performing the role modeling play entitled"A Teenager Is. . . "
u DifftIN
;. Entertainment by students from a These vignettes focus on high-risk
+!'
�•y Jr. _ . Southern California high school is hitting issues such as alcohol and drug abuse,
Administration hard issues. suicide,teen pregnancy,AIDS and sexual
'~ '= '''" ` Marina High School students have abuse. Scenes include:
f�4lriiilrrYr+t>�inaie� written and act in a role playing perform- • A teenager confronting his parents
6a64 go*j" '���,n± -` ance entitled"A Teenager Is. ..'which is who use cocaine
r:ttns)3iHtM r,~?i ::f .' being presented around the state. • A boy whose brother committed ..
In 1987 Marina High School drama suicide
<j [,
` Ire tlt.!1l. s�, mired director Steven Schwartz assigned his • Teens recovering from drug abuse
• � students to complete the sentence"A and the difficulty in returning to
_16;6dioiatOW..,bcbwe Teenager Is ..:' school
Andcha'i i mdoie .". 0'lartq�non. Ott From this start Schwartz's class A 1 telling her dru usin boy
.�arrides,�ie,nbjeeri,.�tid,a�,je,u. "_ - girl 8 g- 8 Y
Aqewli,rl+hp Ott'Datsgloowioa> developed story lines,wrote scenes and friend that she is pregnant
as yt " monologues on issues that affected them,
their parents and friends. Continued on Back Page
Office of Bulk Rate
Criminal Justice Planning U.S•p Postage
1130 K Street, Suite 300 Permit No. 1766
Sacramento, California Sacramento, CA
95814
t
Ms . Linda Paire
. ¢ Prevention Coordinator
County of Oren e
�4L,FoaN�� DeoartRent of gental Health
P. 0. Box 355
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Improved Victim
Services Targeted Teenagers From Page 1
at Workshops - A teenager dealing with an alcoholic County Department of Education Pre-
parent vention '88 Conference.
Exchanging information to improve Interspersed throughout the play are The performance has been refined
victim services was the goal of the Victim readings of"A Teenager Is. . .",which and incorporated into a two-hour pro-
Service Workshops hosted by the San are comical to lighten up the perform- duction filmed and shown on Cable
Bernardino County District Attorney's ance. The play uses no scenery,instead TV in Orange County.
office Victim Witness Assistance the actors are surrounded by the other 'This theater program receives
Program. players. limited financial support from Project
Held on April 12, 1989,the workshops Working on the play allows the NODS(No to Drugs in School),a
provided the opportunity to meet the students to express how they think their school and community-based preven-
Victim Witness Assistance Program staff parents and other adults react to and • tion and intervention program to
and to participate in discussions to better view the world. educate youth and adults about the
protect the rights of crime victims. The intent of the performance is to risks of drug use and involve the
Participants attended workshops raise the awareness level about these community in a well-coordinated
entitled Victims of Crime Claims,Coping high-risk issues and offer support and assault on chemical abuse.
with Homicide,Crime Victimization: It referral to those in pain. The Advisory Board of Project
Does Effect Everyone and Networking. During high school performances, NODS is representative of schools,
Several individuals and organizations adult and peer counselors are available parents,health providers,businesses,
accepted awards for outstanding achieve- after the performances to talk with community organizations,law en-
ment in Victim Services at the luncheon teens who may have-been greatly forcement and local government.
including Upland Foothill Kiwanis— affected by the play. State Senator Marian Bergeson,
Community Service Organization;Bill In addition to high schools,the 23- Supervisor Harriett Wieder,and
Breer,LCSW—Community Service member group has performed for com- Huntington Beach City Council
Providers;Parents of Murdered Children munity groups and conferences, Persons,Tom Mays and Grace
—Victim Service Agency;Cliff Harris, including the February joint training Winchell all serve on this committee.
Sheriff's Office—Law Enforcement conference of the Juvenile Justice NODS is funded by a grant from
Officer;The Honorable Ellen Brodie— Delinquency Prevention and Drug OCJP.
Judicial;Kay Neshat,Deputy District At- Suppression in Schools Programs held For more information regarding the
torney—Prosecutor,Shannon Boone— in Costa Mesa. play or Project NODS contact Diane
Special Victim Award. The play has also been performed at Weider,coordinator of Project NODS,
The workshop was held during the Californian's for Drug Free Youth at(714)964-6855.
Victims'Rights Week. The week salutes National Conference and the Orange
the survivors of crime and focuses
attention on the need for fair treatment of e9,=,
all victims in the aftermath of criminal
activity.
REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
y I_ 0— __-- y,
Date April 20, 1992
Submitted to: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Submitted by: IL HUTTON, CITY ATTORNEY APpjtOVED BY CITY COUNC
Prepared by: GAIL HUTTON, CITY ATTORNEY" f L � �
Subject: POPPIN & SHIER LEGAL SERVICES FINAL PAYMENT
Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception ci cz, tK
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: -M4
Statement of Issue:
The law firm of Poppin & Shier has performed services in
connection with the Waterfront Hilton Hotel pursuant to the
attached authority up to $10,000. The final invoice is in the
additional sum of $1,364 .93. The agency is hereby requested to
authorize the additional payment.
Recommendation:
Authorize payment of the additional sum of $1,364 .93 and
appropriate the same from the account reflected below.
Analysis:
The legal services rendered were in connection with funding of
the Waterfront Hilton Bond issue presently being processed and
fees were reasonable given the large number of documents which
required review.
Funding Source:
Redevelopment Agency account E-TM-ED-810-4-05-00.
Alternative Actions:
Direct the city attorney to negotiate a reduced fee.
Attachments:
1) Statement
2) Original material requisition
3) Original authorization .pursuant to Section 3 .03 . 100
� 0
r.
t� POPPIN & SHIER
LU ►ii t ' L 7 06`Sansome street
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 398-6700
STATEMENT
AS OF JANUARY 31, 1992
Page: 1
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 01/31/92
C/O GAIL HUTTON, CITY ATTORNEY 2516-OOM
PO BOX 2740
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92647
OUR FILE: HUNTINGTON HILTON HOTEL
YOUR P. O. NUMBER 206908
HOURS
01/03/92
JP Telephone conference with G. Hutton regarding
research on trust question and segregation of
funds. .30
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED .30 75.00
RECAPITULATION
--------------
TIMEKEEPER HOURS HOURLY RATE TOTAL
---------- ----- ----------- -----
JOHN POPPIN 0.30 $250.00 $75.00
01/31/92 Long distance Telephone Charges 7.91
TOTAL COSTS 7.91
PREVIOUS BALANCE 11282.02
TOTAL CURRENT WORK 82.91
BALANCE DUE $11,364.93
C1�'Y ryS1 J:•.,i:� .Y'S p�'$I'Ca =_-
jAPPi:ORED I'OR PAY
t j✓� '-"j
,Yr y' nS• era^xc � i`k„a�
4
City O
^``,�4�my+-,$'`'�`*+�" "'C'x,°�,�'�.. �� 'F°"`w`�: Z"-la��:� ylcis'e'ay,'�_z'{ •� r�3�: '�� :
_ 2 —SrTREE ,
HUNTING'�C3 � tf.`� AEtC�RN�A92 {
53(r522-f- 41
Billing/nqufries:(714j536444 -
02/07/92 445317534 206
DATE
POPPIN & SHIER s
706 SANSOME ST
' SAN FHANCISCU CA 94111-0000 — 00000-00,
• • ° ATT: ECON. DEV/ATTORnY "
F RMS
0 DAYS NO NO
O B DESTINATION DELIVERY WITHIN CONFIRM PLUS FRT PREPAY&ADD TE
Y1S
QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE •
UNT
RE: WATERFRONT HILTON HOTEL MATTER
FOR LLGAL SERVICES
NOT TO EXCEED: 10000.00
r
I '
1
a
r W ***10000r0 m'a
TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON REVERSE
FORM A PART OF THIS ORDER
ry
I Amadnt Pu as Manager—City o6 Huntm on act% ;
HB/PO No 113 Rev 7191 -- - -
f
•
1,
REO NBR- AMOUNT REO NBR AMOUNT REO NBR AMOUNT
30141/6
-TH-ED810-40500/ 10000.00
I
i
CONFIDENTIAL
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
7pN BEACH
Michael T. Uberuaga From Gail Hutton
City Administrator City Attorney
t •ect Waterfront Hilton Hotel Date November 6, 1991
Matter
Pursuant to Section 3 . 03 . 100 of the City' s Municipal Code, please
authorize the engagement of the law firm of Poppin & Shier to
assist with bankruptcy issues related to the above matter.
The initial engagement shall not exceed the sum of $10, 000 as
mandated by the above cited code section; 'however, the funds
should be transferred from Barbara Kaise.r ' s account for
professional services to the City Attorney' account immediately,
to insure timely payment of professional services rendered.
GAIL HUTTON
City Attorney
To: Gail Hutton From: Michael Uberuaga
Your request is hereby authorized as above.
G� Michael Uberuaga
cc: Barbara Kaiser, Director of Economic Development
Robert Franz, Director of Administrative Services
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date: March 16, 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator —�
Prepared by: Ronald E. Lowenberg, Chief of Police APPROVED By CITY COUNCIL
Subject: Request for Funding Assistance for Senior
Class Non-Alcohol and Drug Free Grad-Night 1
Celebration Festivities at Local High School _ Crmr
Consistent with Council Policy [ X ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:W<_J
Statement of Issue:
The Senior Class Grad-Night celebrations at our local high schools is an annual program
that exemplifies and reinforces a commitment to non-alcohol and drug-free activities.
Each year the city receives requests from the high school Grad-Night Committees to
provide financial assistance for the graduation night celebrations which are held annually
at each of the four high schools in the community.
Recommendation:
Authorize $4,000 in financial assistance from the Police Narcotic Asset Forfeiture Fund
and direct the Chief of Police to provide four checks in the amount of $1,000 which will
be presented by Mayor Silva to each of the four city high schools - - Huntington Beach,
Edison, Marina and Ocean View High School.
Analysis:
Each year the parents of the senior graduating class from each of the four high schools
within the city organize a graduation night celebration, to be held at each campus for the
graduating senior class. The parents hold fund-raising activities throughout the year and
seek sponsorships and financial donations from private businesses, organizations, and
individuals to help pay for the cost of holding the gala grad-night celebration for an entire
evening, beginning at 7:00 P.M. and lasting until 7:00 A.M. the next morning. Each
campus is transformed into a fascinating variety of theme events and activities in which
the senior graduating class partakes.
SENIOR CLASS GRAD-NIGHT CELEBRATION - con't.
For the past two years the city council has authorized $4,000 from the Police Narcotic
Asset Forfeiture Fund to be provided for these events. One thousand dollars was
distributed to each of the high schools within the City of Huntington Beach. These
schools are Huntington Beach, Edison, Marina and Ocean View High Schools. Mayor
Silva has requested that funding be provided again this year. City staff is requesting
approval for $4,000 from the Police Narcotic Asset Forfeiture Fund to support this non-
alcohol and drug-free event.
Funding Source:
$4,000 to be paid from the Law Enforcement Narcotic Asset Forfeiture Fund.
Alternative Actions:
Do not authorize the expenditure of funds to support the Grad-Night celebrations at the
local high schools.
2
RCA - ROUTING SHEET/CHECKLIST
WHITE - REMAINS WITH RCA
GREEN - ADMINISTRATION COPY
CANARY - CITY ATTORNEY'S COPY
PINK - CITY CLERK'S COPY
GOLD - DEPARTMENT COPY
INITIATING DEPARTMENT Police DATE 2/13/92
Request for Funding Assistance for Senior Class Non-Alcohol
SUBJECT
High Scfiools
MEETING DATE 3/16/92 AGENDA DEADLINE 3/4/92
(TO ADMINISTRATION)
YES NO
PUBLIC NOTICE [ ] [ ] PUBLICATION DATE
LEGAL DEPARTMENT(with Exhibits)
Date In Date Out
INITIATING DEPARTMENT REVIEW/CHECKLIST:
YES NO N/A
[ ] [ ] ordinance [ ] Exhibit 1
Resolution [ ] Exhibit 2
Signed Contract [ ] Exhibit 3
Signed Agreement [ ] Exhibit 4
[ ] [ ] [ ] Neg. Dec/EIR
Insurance Required Additional [ ]
Exhibits Nbr.
Bonds Required
Financial Impact Statement
(Unbudgeted Items Over $1,000)
[ ] [ ] RCA - City Council
[ ] [X [ ] RCA - Redevelopwcy
INITIATING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL BY:
R BERG, Chief of olice
[ ] ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
[ ] CITY CLERK FOR AGENDA
COMMENTS:
•HUNTINGTON BEACH @ FOUNTAIN VALLEY
Independent
THE NEWPORT BEACH •COSTA MESA PILOT
To: Mike Uberuaga - City Administrator
Fr: Dave Garofalo - Grad Nite Committee
Re: GRAD NITE - Annual Contribution from Drug Seizure Funds for
Huntington Beach High Schools - REQUEST
CC: Ron Lowenberg - Chief of Police
Richard Barnard - Deputy City Administrator
With the arrival of warm weather comes the planning for the
city wide (Huntington Beach Union High School District) Grad Nite
planing process. Since the establishment of this event in our
community there has not been a high school graduation death in our
community. We are doing everything we can to continue this trend
through the hugh community effort known as Grad Nite.
Through the cooperation of the police department for the past
several years, we have been able to benefit from a $1, 000 donation
to each of the local high schools including Edison, Huntington
Beach, Ocean View and Marina High Schools. We sincerely and
respectfully request consideration for the 1992 Grad Nits Program.
Thank you in advance for your help. Over 2, 500 seniors
participate in the event and throughout our community certainly
over 200 sets of parents contribute time and resources.
Car
Si cerel ,
avid P. Garofalo
the Grad Nite Effort
February 24, 1992
D
1992
CITY OF HUNTINCTON BEACH
ADMIMSTRATIVE ®FFIC.E
18682 Beach Boulevard, Suite 160 q
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 l
(714) 965-3030
(714) 965-7174 FAX }�
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date: March 16, 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers AppRO`rED BY CITY COUNCIL
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator ,3_-L�-- 199p
Prepared by: Ronald E. Lowenberg, Chief of Police
CI Y CL K
•
Subject: UPGRADE OF JAIL SECURITY, SURVEILLAN AND ALARM SYSTEMS
Consistent with Council Policy [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:o,cll
Statement of Issue:
The Huntington Beach jail security, surveillance and alarm systems are outdated. Some
do not work at all because they were connected to the old CADS system, which has been
replaced. The original software company which did the system is no longer in business,
so modifications to the system cannot be done. Video and audio capabilities are a
necessity for security and fire safety. Additional cameras are required, too, to have total
surveillance capability.
Recommendation:
Appropriate $5,000 from the General Fund's Unappropriated Fund Balance to Account
#339433.
Analysis:
The Communications Bureau security system is currently being upgraded. There will be
considerable savings if the jail security system can be upgraded in conjunction with the
Communications upgrade. The systems are meant to work in unison, and the upgrade
of the jail security system will be done much faster and at less cost if this transfer of
funds is approved.
Funding Source:
General Fund.
UPGRADE OF JAIL SECURITY - con't.
Alternative Actions:
1. Do not approve the transfer. This will result in a continued security and fire-alarm
deficiency.
2. Fund at a later time. This will cost more and require a greater length of time to
complete.
2
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date: March 16, 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
Prepared by: Ronald E. Lowenberg, Chief of Police
Subject: UPGRADE OF JAIL SECURITY, SURVEIL LA fE ND ALARM SYSTEMS
Consistent with Council Policy [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:���/
Statement of Issue:
The Huntington Beach jail security, surveillance and alarm systems are outdated. Some
do not work at all because they were connected to the old CADS system, which has been
replaced. The original software company which did the system is no longer in business,
so modifications to the system cannot be done. Video and audio capabilities are a
necessity for security and fire safety. Additional cameras are required, too, to have total
surveillance capability.
Recommendation:
f $5,000 from the General Fund to Account #339433.
Analysis:
The Communications Bureau security system is currently being upgraded. There will be
considerable savings if the jail security system can be upgraded in conjunction with the
Communications upgrade. The systems are meant to work in unison, and the upgrade
of the jail security system will be done much faster and at less cost if this transfer of
funds is approved.
Funding Source:
General Fund.
' " E CORPORATE OFFICE
GREATER �LAR��M 7461 1_orge Circle
Huntington Beach,CA 92647
C O M�TA (800)877-0776
I.ic. , LA 007.082= Ctr.Lic. /1469046 PROPOSAL
DATE: 12-19-91
SUBMITTED TO: JOB INFO:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 714 960-8805 HUNTINGTON BEACH POLICE DISPATCH CENTER
NAME PHONE NAME PHONE
2000 MAIN ST SAME
ADDRESS ADDRESS
HUNTINGTON BEACH,_ CA 92648
CITY,STATE AND ZIP CITY,STATE AND ZIP
—TYPE— SYSTEM ACCOUNT STATUS
�• RESIDENTIAL DIMMER AL ❑ O LOCAL 0 NEW
FI EURITY ❑ MUSIC/INTERCOM ❑NTROL 0 AUTOMATION SYS. XO MONTHLY SERVICE ❑ RESIGN
CCTV ❑ CENTRAL VACUUM ❑ TAKEOVER
The Greater Alarm Company, Inc. is pleased to recommend the following:
JAVELIN REPLACEMENT UPGRADE
THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT IS REQUIRED FOR UPGRADE FROM EXISTING JAVELIN 2000 SYSTEM TO THE 1500 SYSTEM:
REGULAR PRICE DISCOUNTED PR)CE
1 J01500 MASTER CONTROL SYSTEM WITH A CPU RACK MOUNTED CRT $ 5850 $ 2000C�M.'s
WITH ALL SOTWARE FOR STANDARD OPERATION,
1 J03318CP OPERATOR CONTROL PANEL 2500 N/C
1 J030SAVP VIDEO PANEL FOR CONNECTION TO THE J01500 SYSTEM 2950 2500
AND THE EXISTING JAIL SYSTEM,
2 J0205AVP VIDEO PA'1EL FOR EXPANDING TH EXISTING JAIL SYSTEM. ($600 EA) 1200 1100
LABOR TO INSTALL THE ABOVE EQUIPMENT - 20 HOURS ($15 PER HOUR) 1500 1000
TOTAL $14,000 $ 6600
THE EQUIPMENT PROPOSED IS TO REPLACE EXISTING JAVELIN 2000 SYSTEM WHICH IS NOT SERVICEABLE DUE TO SOFTWARE AND HARD DRIVE
COMPANY OUT OF BUSINESS.
JAVELIN AND GREATER ALARM WILL PROVIDE A ONE YEAR WARRANTY FOR THE ABOVE EQUIPMENT,
THE ABOVE EQUIPMENT AND DESIGN LAYOUT HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY MR, RAY PAYNE, V,P, OF ENGINEERING FOR JAVELIN.
UPGRADE FOR COMMUNICATION LINK BETWEEN RADIONICS AND JAVELIN MASTER CONTROLS SHALL BE EXTRA.
STATE TAX IS NOT INCLUDED (CHARGED ON EQUIPMENT ONLY),
PURCHASF LEASE
TOTAL $ ;6,600 INSTALLATION FEE $
TOTAL INVESTMENT $ TOTAL $
LESS DEPOSIT $ LESS DEPOSIT $
BALANCE $ BALANCE $
MONTHLY SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE MAINTENANCE INCLUDED(Y/N) —
❑ NON-SUPERVISED MONITORING $ ❑ LEASE OF EQUIPMENT $
❑ SUPERVISED MONITORING $_ _ ❑ NON-SUPERVISED MONITORING $ _
❑ FIRE TIMER TEST $ _ _ ❑ SUPERVISED MONITORING $ _
— $_ ❑ FIRE TIMFR TES I
TOTAL PER MONTH S_ _ ❑ $
BILLED QUARTERLY IN ADVANCE —'—
ITnTnl.Prn MfINT4
BILLED OLIARTERLY IN ADVANCE
TERMS: 90% UPON DELIVERY, NET UPON COMPLETION,
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The abcvc pr•ic.?s,specificat;nns and conrliitinnc are satisfactory and are hereby,iccepred.You are authorized to do the
work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.This Proposal may be withdrawn by Creator-Alarm if net accepted within forty-live(ab)days
from the above dat
COMPANY SUBSCRIBER
BY GEO �E DEMARCO ACOInjnt/ BY —Si9rrr uru — — Date
APPROVED
Authorized Olhcer/I rr.No Print Nan" Title
THIS PROPOSAL SHALL:NOT BE BINDING UPON COMPANY UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY AN OFFICER OF COMPANY IN THE EVENT OF NON-APPROVAL,
THE SOLE LIABILITY OF COMPANY SHALL BE TO REFUND TO SUBSCRIBER THE AMOUNT THAT HAS BEEN PAID TO Cl1MPANY BY SUBSCRIBER UPON THE
SIGNING OF THIS PROPOSAL..THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PROPOSAL ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN
AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
P-5 I/91 WHITE—FILE YELLOW--SUBSCRIBER PINK—CONSULTANT
RCA - ROUTING SHEET/CHECKLIST
WHITE - REMAINS WITH RCA
GREEN - ADMINISTRATION COPY
CANARY - CITY ATTORNEY'S COPY
PINK - CITY CLERK'S COPY
GOLD - DEPARTMENT COPY
INITIATING DEPARTMENT POLICE DATE_ 2/19/92
Upgrade of Jail Security, Surveillance and
SUBJECT Alarm Systems
MEETING DATE 3/16/92 AGENDA DEADLINE. 3/,9/92
(TO ADMINISTRATION)
YES NO
PUBLIC NOTICE [ ] [ ] PUBLICATION DATE
LEGAL DEPARTMENT(with Exhibits)
Date In Date Out
INITIATING DEPARTMENT REVIEW/CHECKLIST:
YES NO N/A
[ ] [ ] [>( ordinance ( ] Exhibit 1
[ ] [ ] 041",Resolution [ ] Exhibit 2
[ ] [ ) [x signed Contract [ ] Exhibit 3
[ ] [ ] [ Signed Agreement [ ] Exhibit 4
[ ] [ ] [ Neg. Dec/EIR
[ ] [ ] nsurance Required Additional [ ]
Exhibits Nbr.
[ ] [ ] onds Required
[ ] [ ] ] Financial Impact Statement
(Unbudgeted Items over $1,000)
] [ ] [ ] RCA - City Council
( ] [ ] [ ] RCA - Redevelopment Agency
INITIATING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL BY:
. E. ERG, Chief of P ice
[ ] ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
[ ] CITY CLERK FOR AGENDA
COMMENTS:
HeJ
! CITY OF HUNTINOTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUN"NG"/EACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, DEPUTY CITY ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION FOR UPGRADE OF JAIL SECURITY
F.I.S. 92-05
DATE: MARCH 5, 1992
As required under the authority of Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement
has been prepared and submitted relative to the proposed funding for the
upgrading of jail security, surveillance and the alarm system, as coordinated
with the current upgrading of the Communications Bureau. An appropriation of
$5,000 would be adequate for this project.
Upon approval of the City Council , the balance of the designa unreserved
General Fund would be reduced to $4,273,000.
ROBERT RAN
Deputy Cit Ad inistr or
RJF:pdc
WPADSERT:802
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date: March 16, 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administrator
Prepared by: Ronald E. Lowenberg, Chief of Police APPROVED BY%CI fY COUNCi .
Subject: Appropriation for Consulting Services for 3.flfo,[91. -------
the Feasibility Study of Law Enforcement
Regional Air Support Conceptawl 71
�,,�CIT1f I
Consistent with Council Policy [ X ] Yes [ ] New Policy or ExcelAlon
Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachmi7nifs: QQ*:J
Statement of Issue:
For 22 years the Huntington Beach Aero Unit has been an integral part of the Police
Department and the community it serves. The Aero Units primary mission is to support
police patrol services with a secondary mission of narcotic surveillance work and a
number of public safety assignments (i.e., disasters, rescues, etc.).
In a continuing effort to control costs and improve helicopter services, the cities of
Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa and the County of Orange are involved in a project to
examine airborne law enforcement programs and to do a feasibility study for a regional
air support unit.
Recommendation:
Respectfully request City Council approve an appropriation in the sum of$9,000 from the
Narcotic Forfeiture Fund to the Allan Consulting Group. This cost is one-third of the total
overall cost of $27,000 of which the other two-thirds has been paid by the City of Costa
Mesa and the County of Orange.
Analysis:
This study will determine if the regionalization of airborne law enforcement services is the
most financially and operationally sound method of delivering public safety helicopter
services.
Funding Source: ]
0 to be id from the Law Enforcement Narcotic Asset Forfeiture Fund. ✓
$9, 00 pa �,
. y
LAW ENFORCEMENT REGIONAL AIR SUPPORT - con't.
Alternative Actions:
Do not approve the appropriation in the sum of$9,000 from the Narcotic Forfeiture Fund
to the Allan Consulting Group.
2
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK
CITY OF
HUNTIN•^,TON FE"CH,CALIF.
g�
REQUEST FOR C� 'CO & ACTION
Date: March 2, 1992
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Submitted by: Michael T. Uberuaga, City Administra
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
Prepared by: Ronald E. Lowenberg, Chief of Police �.�
—19
Subject: Jail Food Account
CIT c �
Consistent with Council Policy [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue.Recommendation,Analysis,Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
Statement of Issue:
When this fiscal year's budget was in the adoption stage, the City's contract with the
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) was only in the very early negotiation stage.
The contract was not formalized and signed until near the second quarter of the 91/92
budget. The contract has impacted the jail's Kitchen Supply Account.
Recommendation:
Transfer $25,000 from the General Fund to the Jail Ktchen Supplies Account, #334244.
Analysis:
The late signing and implementation of the INS contract did not allow for proper budget
preparation in the area of kitchen supplies for the jail. Additionally, the population intake
from INS has been greater than anticipated. As an example, in August of 1991, the
month prior to implementation of the INS contract, we served 1,576 meals in the jail. In
January, 1992, we served 3,130 meals in the jail. We have nearly doubled our kitchen
supplies output. The positive side of this factor is that since our population count has
increased, our revenue has increased. If the daily INS population count maintains its
current level, we will receive over $150,000 revenue in excess of our original estimate of
$450,000. We cannot accept these prisoners, however, if we do not have the kitchen
supplies to handle them. We therefore request the transfer of funds to accommodate this
revenue-generating contract.
Funding Source:
General Fund.
JAIL FOOD ACCOUNT - con't.
Page two
Alternative Actions:
Refuse INS prisoners, which would result in a significant reduction in revenue.
2
Fi
�
N3BEACHfe CITY OF HUNTINGTON
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUK"NGTON BEACH
TO: MICHAEL T. UBERUAGA, City Administrator
FROM: ROBERT J. FRANZ, Deputy City Administrator
SUBJECT: REQUESTED ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR CITY'S JAIL KITCHEN SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT, FIS 93-03
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1992
As required under the authority of Resolution 4832, a Fiscal Impact Statement
has been prepared and submitted relative to the proposed additional funding
necessary to sustain the jail 's kitchen supply inventory through the duration of
the fiscal year. An appropriation of $25,000 would be adequate for this purpose.
Upon approval of the City Council , the balance of the un nated, unreserved
General Fund would be reduced to $4,318,000.
ROBERT F ANZ
Deputy City Administrator
RJF:AR:skd
WPADSERT:796 p