HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 3, 1980 - Special Municipal Election - Statewide Primar K — L
I
HUNTINGTON BEACH
I
Voters Pamphlet
I
PROPOSED MEASURES,
CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
AND ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST
o CITY MEASURES
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
CONSOLIDATED WITH THE
STATEWIDE PRIMARY ELECTION
TUESDAY,JUNE 3, 1980
I,
i
I
I
I
J ) PROPOSITION
ADVISORY PROPOSITION:
That the Governor and the Legislature YES
apportion the existing six cent sales tax so that two
cents rather than the one cent presently allocated,
may be used by local agencies for priority local
services rather than state distribution or state NO
reserves.
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY OF PROPOSITION K
The sales tax advisory proposition proposes that the governor and legislature
adopt legislation to apportion the existing 6% sales and use tax so that 2 cents
The following arguments for and against the city measures have been filed with rather than 11/4 cents presently allocated, be returned to local governments.
the City Clerk pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 5 (Sections 5010 to The effect of the adoption of such legislation would be for the state govern-
5016, inclusive) of the Elections Code of,the State of California. Arguments in
support or opposition of the proposed laws are the opinions of the authors. ment to incur a substantial reduction of its revenues and the local govern-
ments to reap a substantial increase in their revenues with the total amount
of the sales tax remaining the same.
Under requirements of the 1975 amendments to the Federal Voting Rights Act,the City has Currently the City of Huntington Beach receives 1 cent of the 11/4 cents with
arranged to provide translation of these ballot materials into the Spanish language. A transla- the County of Orange receiving the remainder.
tion of these ballot materials may be obtained in person at the City Clerk's office in the City
Hall or,if requested by letter or telephone,a translation•will be promptly,nailed. Adoption of the proposition would be advisory only and a reflection of the
Banjo los requisitos de los enmendamientos do 1975 al Acto Federal do Dereclios de Vota will of the electorate of this city.
cion, la Ciudad ha hecho arreglos Para proporcionar traduccion del texto do la balota al GAIL HUTTON
idionta Cspanol. Una traduccion del texto de la balota se puede obtener en persona en la
oficina del Secretario Municipal situada en la Alcaldia, o si es solicitada por carta o por City Attorney
telefono,una traduccion se enviara por correo prontamente.
ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, City Clerk
City Hall, 2000 Main Street
P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach,California 92648
Phone: 536-5227 i
I
ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSE, )N "K" PROPOSITIC
Want to send a message to Sacramento?Then vote YES on Proposition"K"1 (a) "Shall rental housing developments, as con-
Ask yourself, what public services are of the greatest importance to you? templated by Article 34 of the California Constitu-
Police protection? tion, for elderly, handicapped,low or moderate in-
Fire protection? come persons be developed, constructed, financed
Libraries? o or acquired in the unincorporated.area of the
County of Orange and in participating cities, sub-
Parks and Recreation? ject to the following conditions:
All these services are provided by local government and essential to a good No county or city general fund monies shall be ex-
quality of life. pended for such housing.
Certainly they are of far greater value than those championed by overstaffed No project shall be authorized by authority of this
state and federal bureaucracies which produce questionable benefits to the measure in the unincorporated area of the county YES
> p q unless notice of any such proposed project is first
public while unquestionably devouring your tax dollars. submitted to each member of the Board of Super-
Did you know that the state collects locally a 6% sales tax, yet returns only visors for approval and, at the same time, notice is
given to the public.
slightly more than 1%?The rest stays in Sacramento where a budget surplus
has proven to be an irresistible temptation for Sacramento politicians to Notice to the public shall e legal notice in the
underwrite their pet projects. newspaper having the greatest circulation within
the affected area where the property is located and
Yet, local government is faced with having to reduce or hold the line on these by posting the property in at least three (3) con-
most important public services. spicuous places.
Notice shall be submitted to each member of the
It simply does not make sense! Board and to the public before any funding ap-
Proposition"K" tells Sacramento it had better get the priorities straight, and plication to a non-County entity is made for project
approval or funding. After submittal to the Board
address our most critical needs without increasing the tax burden.' members,any Board member shall have thirty(30)
Proposition "K" proposes that some of that money that now goes to and is days to place the matter on the Board agenda for
spent in Sacramento be returned to local government so that city and county the purpose of initiating a public hearing on the
government does.not have to be concerned with providing you with the kind proposed project. If the matter the
project shall not be deemed approvv placed,ed until the
of police and fire protection or other critical services you need and deserve. Board, after such public hearing, approves, or con-
Remember that our spending limit and that proposed under the "Spirit of ditionally approves, the project..If no action is
13" initiative requires that any extra revenue would have to be returned to taken a a member of the Board during the thirty
(30) day period, the application, including the
you, or be used for much needed public improvements. project applied for, shall be considered approved.
To assure essential local services, to reduce that surplus in Sacramento, vote Any project proposed to be located in incorporated NO
for local control and for Proposition "K". areas of the County shall be submitted to the ap-
propriate City Council members for action in the
DON MACALLISTER ROBERT MANDIC, JR. same manner as hereinabove described.
Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Housing built or rehabilitated pursuant to this
City of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach measure shall not exceed 5% of the total dwelling
units within the unincorporated area of the County
of
ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPSITION "K" I city.Orange or, for participating cities, within the .
I
(None Filed) A city is a participating city if the city council
adopted a resolution requesting participation in
this measure and submitted it to the Registrar of
Voters on or before March 21, 1980."
The cities 'icipating in this measure are: Anaheim,fr `�na Park,
CITY A� )RNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS, OF I�►POSITION "L" Costa Mesa, Hun,.-gton Beach, La Habra, Los Alamitos, San C.._.iente, San
Before a low rent housing project can be developed, constructed, or Juan Capistrano and Tustin.
acquired by a state public body, such as the Orange County Housing GAIL HUTTON
Authority, within a county or city, Article 34.of the California Constitution City Attorney
requires approval by a majority of the voters of that county or city. The
Constitution defines such housing projects, in part, as "any development
composed of. . . living accommodations for persons of low income, financed
in whole or in part by the federal government or a state public body or to
which the federal government or a state public body extends assistance . . ."
Proposition "L" gives the voters of those cities within Orange County
which have chosen to participate in this election under Article 34, an
opportunity to decide whether such housing shall be provided, with certain
limitations as discussed below, for the elderly, handicapped, and other low
income persons of the county or participating city. The decision of the voters
of a participating city shall apply only within that city.
If approved, this proposition imposes several limitations on the
production of such housing. The limitations are:
1. No city general fund money can be used.
2. Notice of a specific, proposed project must be given to each member
of the City Council and to the public.
3. Notice to the public must be placed in an established.newspaper with
the greatest circulation within the area of the proposed housing project site
and must be posted in at least three conspicuous places on the proposed
site.
4. If application to a noncounty body for funding or approval of such I
housing is to be made, notice to the Council and to the public must be given
before such an application for approval or funding is made. `
5:The City Council must approve the proposed application and project.
6. Approval by the City Council can occur in one of two ways: (a) A 1
Council member,within thirty days of the notice,can place the matter before
the entire Council and, after a public hearing, the Council can approve or
conditionally approve the project, or'(b) if no Council member submits the
matter to the entire Council for a public hearing within thirty days of the
notice, the project is deemed approved.
7. The total number of units produced cannot exceed five percent (5%)
of the total number of dwelling units within the city limit area.
ry 4
",ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSIT-14 "L"
The rising cost of housing has made it very difficult for many families,
particularly senior citizens, to afford decent, safe housing without sacrificing
other essential items. Many are forced to spend a high percentage of their
incomes on 'housing which is substandard.
Approval of this measure will enable private developers to qualify for federal
and state housing funds to provide good quality new housing at rents which
these lower income persons can afford and to make older rental units livable
again.
The use of these programs requires no outlay of city or county funds and no
added cost to the taxpayer. In fact, the measure specifically prohibits use of
local general funds for this housing.
Approval of this measure does not mean the county must accept all housing
proposed. The housing must be designed to blend with the quality and style
of private housing in the neighborhood and it does not have to be in
apartment type projects. Notice of any housing proposed would be given,
and approval by the City Council at a public hearing may be required, if
public sentiment demands it. The amount of housing is limited to a small
portion (5%) in the city.
The taxpayers of Orange County are already paying for state and federal
housing programs, while the money and benefits from many of these housing
programs go to other areas. Each year the absence of Article XXXIV authority
continues, the county loses approximately two million dollars which
otherwise would be available for affordable housing. Passing of this ballot
measure would enable Huntington Beach to get their fair share of state and
federal housing dollars.
There is a pressing need for the housing this measure will provide. We
strongly recommend approval of this proposition.
RUTH BAILEY RUTH FINLEY
Mayor Mayor Pro Tern
City of Huntington Beach City of Huntington Beach
ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPOSITION "L"
(None Filed)
ELECTION SUPPLIERS
.Uartin. & Chapman Co.
2131 BIXBY ROAD
LAKEWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90712
Phone A26-2511
SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
CONSOLIDATED WITH THE
STATEWIDE PRIMARY ELECTION
TU ESDAY,J UN E 3, 1980
Feb. 4 Last day to adopt or amend regulations regarding Candidates' Statements.
Feb. 8 Suggested last day for City Council to adopt Resolution Calling Election and to adopt
Resolution Requesting Consolidation.(When offices are to be filled.)
Feb. 11 First day to issue nomination papers.
Mar. 6 First day to publish "Notice of Election" pursuant to Sections 22830 and 22831, Elections
Code. (When offices are to be filled.)
Mar. 7 Last day to file nomination papers.
Mar. 13 Secretary.of State to draw randomized alphabet.
Mar. 20 Last day to publish "Notice of Election."(When offices are to be filled.)
Mar. 21- Last day to submit resolutions Calling Election and Requesting Consolidation to Board of
Supervisors and to Registrar of Voters.
Mar. 28 Last day to file names of candidates with the Registrar of Voters.
Suggested last day to file arguments.
April 4 First day to publish Charter Amendments.
April 14 Last day to publish "Notice of Election" pursuant to Sections 2554 and 2653, Elections
Code. (When no offices are to be filled.)
City Clerk shall publish list of nominees and/or measures once a week for two successive
.weeks. (Can be combined with above publication.)
April 24 Last day to publish Charter Amendments.
April 30 Last day to file a campaign statement with a closing date of April 23, 1980 with the City
Clerk.
May 5 Registration and transferring closes.
First day voters may apply to Registrar of Voters for absent voter ballot.
May22 Last day to file a campaign statement with a closing date of May 19, 1980 with the City
Clerk.
May 27 Last day for write-in candidate to file declaration and nomination signatures with the City
Clerk. (Legal day, May 26, holiday).
Last day voter may apply to Registrar of Voters for absent voter ballot.
June 3 Election Day. (Polls open 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.)
Upon certification of results by the Registrar of Voters, the City Council shall meet to
declare the result of the election. Newly elected officials to be sworn in. New Mayor and
Council Members must file a."Statement of Economic Interest" within 30 days.
July 31 Last day to file a campaign statement with a closing date of June 30, 1980 with the City
Clerk.
CEF 'ICATE OF REGISTRAR OF VOTERS T 'ESULT
OF THt CANVASS OF THE PRIMARY ELECTION KETURNS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, A. E. Olson, Registrar of Voters of Orange County, do hereby
certify the following to be a full , true and correct Statement of the
Vote of the election listed below, consolidated with the Primary
Election held on June 3, 1980.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ELECTION
T;
MEASURE "K" - APPORTION SALES TAX (ADVISORY)
CA...'-•yam �9
YES: 34,912 E',o
NO: 7,944
oar ,
MEASURE "L" - LOW RENT HOUSING
YES: 25,011
NO: 16,809
TOTAL VOTES CAST: 51,795
I hereby certify that the number of votes cast for and against the
measure as is set forth above appears in the Certified Abstract of
Statement of the Vote entered in the Records of the Board of Supervisors
of the County of Orange.
WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this 27th day of September, 1980.
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
$� Orange County
Q
l 'IFICATE OF REGISTRAR OF VOTER; RESULT
OF THE CANVASS OF THE PRIMARY ELECTION RETURNS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) ss.
OUNTY OF ORANGE )
I A. E. Olson, Registrar of Voters of Orange County, do hereby
certify e following to be a full , true and correct Statement of e
Vote of th election listed below, . consolidated with the Primary
Election hel on June 3, 1980.
CITY OF HUNTI GTON BEACH ELECTION
MEASURE "K" - APP TION SALES TAX (ADVISORY)
YES: 4,726
NO: 899
MEASURE "L LOW RENT HOU NG
YES: 24,871
NO: 16,719
TOTAL VOTES CAST: 51 ,5.1
I hereby certify th the number of vote cast for and against the
measure as is set fort above appears in the Ce tified Abstract of
Statement of the Vot entered in the Records of t Board of Supervisors
of the County of ange.
WITNESS my ha and Official Seal this 15th day of July, 980.
0
0
.
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
Orange County
rn�am
T. R. EGAN
O U NTY O F RAN G E DIRECTOR
2 1
�- C:) BARBARA FOX
�53
GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
SPECIAL SERVICES
REGISTRATION & ELECTIONS DIVISION
A. E. OLSON, REGISTRAR OF VOTERS MAILING ADDRESS:
1 300 S. GRAND AVE. P.O.BOX 11298
SANTA ANA, CA 92705 SANTA ANA,CA 92711
(714) 834-2244
July 15, 1980
Alicia Wentworth, City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Dear Ms. Wentworth:
We are enclosing the certification of the -statement of the
vote and a copy of the abstract for the election held in
your city on June 3, 1980.
Very truly yours,
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
Orange County
BY �-� c —
Rosaly Lever, Deputy
ral
enc.
Huntington Beach Precinct 32-191:
NONPARTISAN OFFICES
Total Ballots Cast 279
Superior Court Judge, Superior Court Judge, Superior Court Judge,
Office No. 1 Office No. 8 Office No. 11
E. Charles Forde 74 Robert H. Kuehn 21 Sid Radus 31
Frank Briseno 141 Joe A. Dickerson 31 Robert D. Chatterton. 77
Ragnar R. Engebretsen 54 Julian Cimbaluk 14
Superior Court Judge, John F. Cronin 20 Robert R. Fitzgerald 81
Office No. 6 James L. "Jim" Smith 68
Alphonsus Novick 73 John F. F. Bovee 9 Superior Court Judge,
Leonard H. McBride 134 James R. Goff 8 Office No. 14
Sueanne Currie Lewis 44
Superior Court Judge, Spencer R. Alter 11
Office No. 9 James Wright Cook 89
Thomas W. "Tom" Privette 97 G. Godfrey Sandeen 11
Ronald H. Prenner 105 Robert M. Ball 24
Joseph L. Barilla 26
Superior Court Judge,
Office No. 10
Mark A. Soden 95
Richard Farnell 113
STATE AND LOCAL MEASURES
Prop 1 Prop 2 Prop 3 Prop 4 Prop 5 Prop 6
For Against For Against Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
112 143 156 100 138 117 96 161 194 65 119 113
Prop 7 Prop 8 Prop 9 Prop 10 Prop 11
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
209 51 123 125 134 138 120 145 113 154
County Measures City of Huntington Beach Measures
"All "B" "K11 "Ll'
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
168 67 166 60 186 45 140 90
iv
ADDENDUM
Huntington Beach Precinct 32-191 was inadvertently omitted from the listings and the totals in this
Statement of Votes Cast in the June 3, 1980, Primary Election. The totals for Precinct 32-191 are given below:
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLICAN AMERICAN INDEPENDENT
Total Ballots Cast 162 Total Ballots Cast 81 Total Ballots Cast 1
Presidential Preference Presidential Preference Presidential Preference
Jimmy Carter 49 Benjamin Fernandez - Sean Morton Downey, Jr. -
Edmund G. Brown Jr. 10 George Bush 5 John Rarick -
Edward M. Kennedy 68 John B. Anderson 7
Unpledged Delegation 18 Ronald Reagan 67 Delegates to Convention
Lyndon H. LaRouche 7 Phil Crane - No Preference -
(Wm. Shearer, Chairman)
United States Senator United States Senator
Frank L. Thomas 20 John G. Schmitz 31 United States Senator
David T. Rees 9 Paul Gann 25 James C. (Jim) Griffin -
Alan Cranston 99 Brian Hyndman -
Richard Morgan 19 Ray Hanzlik -
Sam Yorty 19
Representative in Congress James A. Ware 1 LIBERTARIAN
34th District Philip Schwartz 2
David Yachimowicz 31 Total Ballots Cast 5
Ivan E. Lynch 31 Representative in Congress
Jim McNab 29 34th District United States Senator
Simone 35 Dan Lungren 64 David Bergland 3
Member of the Assembly Member of the Assembly Central Committee
73rd District 73rd District 2nd Supervisorial District
Dennis Mangers 123 Nolan Frizzelle 62 Barbara B. Kamm -
Archie Kessell -
Central Committee Central Committee Charles E. "Chuck" Heiser -
73rd Assembly District 73rd Assembly District David W. James -
Sidney R. Kuperberg 44 Gary W. Jamison 42 Gerard Francis Charles -
Robert (Bob) Hanson 57 Richard P. Alexander 40 Dan Mahaffey 2
Joseph G. Pallo 43 Coanne Cubete 31 Wm. H. "Will" Marshall 1
Linda Moulton 47 Mary M. Ciddio 27 Benesta G. Marshall 1
Peggy L. Staggs 57 Daniel C. Montano 37 Devon Showley 2
Wilma Stevens 55 Evelyn P. Mayberry 35 David Woodrow Smith 1
Sharon Schroeder 74 Roger D. Slates 43 Earl Bell 2
Kathy Bode 73 Phyllis E. Batchelor 41
Dan Burcham 41
Pam Barbaro 61
Brian F. Garland 54
PEACE AND FREEDOM
No Ballots Cast
111
STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST—PRIMARY ELECTION—JUNE 3,1980
r --
ORANGECOUNTY LOCAL MEASURES
H J ._K — L M N 0 0-_.. .._ P 0 i
I
q N Vm m m °ELECTION ^ c
~ ° Ii c
E EPRECINCTS p
o' c Q L) Y U o
o= > > c 2 2= o= c ? c m q c
! I m cU c 2 T 0 I S c J c J c N X u fn d
« 3 ; - a «_ ; «_ 3 — — — «_ E J
U J U J I U Q Q U J U J U J U¢ LL LL U a U
27 MEASURES Yes No Yes No I Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No i Yes No Yes No j Yes No
17-208-1 (0405) - -- - !Ob 87
17-269-1 10576) 142 162
17-270-1 10502) 131 95
17-274-1 (06731 175 117
17-275-1 (06031 I 162 121 I I
17-27o-1 103581 112. 95
17-278-1 405491 I 152 131
17-279-1 (05461 144 113 I I
17-281-1 105961 19.2 141
L7-282-L (05L31 ! 127 47
0-283-1 (04621 I 11G 108 j
17-286-1 104841 122 65 j
17-287-1 (05521 I I 145 133
17-288-L 405101 161 97
17-190-1 103661 f 89 64
17-293-L (0337) 117 65
17-294-1 (04651 L57 96
17-335-1 104491 124 118
17-336-1 (03991 106 97
17-337-1 (06481 206 108
17-338-L 107121 154 121
17-339-1 10378► I 68 55 ,
17-340-1 I03621 96 82
17-344-1 104211 115 76 , i
17-345-1 (04671 124 65 `
17-348-1 (04501 j lt7 111
17-35C-1 (C4211 I 111 871
17-351-1 104271 129 781 ! i
17-352-1 404151 129 69
L7-353-L (05151 136 11B ( j
� 17-354-1 10410! ' 85 63
17-355-1 404881 152 b7 !
17-356-1 104871 133 122
j 32-145-1 (03561 170 29 98 94
31-146-L (05441 258 44 164 120 j
32-148-L 103641 142 26 91 72
32-149-1 104741 189 44 138 88
32-150-1 (04321 158 60 125 91
32-151-1 (1125) 276 54 213 112
32-151-2 I1125) 283 47 218 106
32-152-1 409451 245 62 195 105
32-153-1 (04911 187 55 124 114 I l
32-154-1 404691 174 40 114 97
32-155-1 (0597) 249 50 1b2 130
i 32-156-1 104191 202 28 118 103
32_157-1 40447) 233 33 149 104
32158-1 409071 333 67 229 168
j 32-L59-1 (04791 229 45 135 115
1 32-160-1 109721 103 33 85 46
32-160-2 409721 107 26 72 60 I j
32-161-1 104381 100 57 95 51 j
32-162-L (05651 241 62 179 104
32-L63-1 10604) 266 59 189 128 j
32-164-L (02831 133 33 104 56
j 32-165-1 (05711 217 50 L58 109
32-166-1 40638) 261 46 183 115
32-167-L 10539) 170 53 133 90
32-168-1 (06451 148 51 123 69
32-169-1 405801 164 42 127 73
32-170-1 105161 189 54 124 L06
32-171-L 104841 163 43 99 L02
32-172-1 (05531 142 46 108 80 j
32-173-1 IOb791 159 35 129 63 I 1
32-174-1 (07351 243 52 206 85
32-175-L 40675) 319 61 189 167
i 32-L76-1 (0560) 252 42 162 134
32-177-L (08321 216 46 164 85
32-178-1 106051 138 37 124 56 i
32-179-1 106171 273 62 175 142 i
32-180-L 405551 181 41 131 92
32-101-1 104081 L67 40 110 89
32-182-1 103701 144 37 99 81
32-183-1 (04901 L34 51 106 72
32-184-1 104661 143 49 97 92
32-185-1 (0634) 213 62 L48 122 I
32-186-1 104221 152 44 108 79
I 32-187-1 104261 1 1 204 28 134 � 97 l j
�:« - 346
STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST—PRIMARY ELECTION—JUNE 3.1980
LOCAL MEASURES
ORANGECOUNTY N J K L M N O O P
E
F E o
o _ u
m i
oAELECTION
c
c c r *PRECINCTS S C
o
ON C 2 22 a2 Gy o G G cq �2
VN !q�!q A
E o o y° 2 � J o J m y b
G¢ O O S O¢ O¢ = 7 > C c
n
UJ UJ UQ Q UJ UJ UJ U¢ ll w U Q 04J
27 MEASURES Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
32-188-1 (04701 172 47 131 92
32-L89-t 40592) 190 47 163 62
32-190-1 105741 192 52 131 108 i
32-192-1 405761 193 71 142 116
32-193-1 (05941 227 55 165 111
32-194-1 406311 190 44 152 76 I j
32-195-1 (07231 177 50 125 84
32-196-1 (0438) 162 30 108 69
32-197-1 406681 187 40 164 65
32-198-1 105771 277 49 122 40 186 98 139
64
32-199-L (04771
32-2100-1 411251 250 27 161 101 j
32-200-2 111251 176 58 28 146 30
32-201-1 403631 55
32-202-1 (06011 236 52 165 107
32-203-1 (0426) 156 51 107 91
32-204-1 (05271 197 43 129 104
32-205-L (04491 185 36 123 89
32-206-1 403631 151 36 126 63
32-207-1 (05131 129 40 105 64
32-232-1 40448) 140 33 107 59
32-247-1 (05451 231 49 156 120
32-265-1 (05851 177 47 L25 101
32-266-1 106091 256 55 152 144
32-267-1 105951 233 50 151 118
32-269-1 (06311 279 58 197 125
32-270-1 (04971 202 44 134 102
32-276-1 (03T71 117 43 106 51
32-278-1 406991 187 42 164 51
32-280-1 10576) 260 70 219 104
32-282-1 (0504) 192 41 121 105
32-263-1 (03621 162 40 106 94
32-284-L 104791 126 44 105 62
32-28 -L 106621 56 1 1 /
32-286 159-1 107551 1S9 SO 138 38 70 70
i 32-288-1 (06161 199 46 161 74
32-289-1 (05061 241 30 143 115
32-293-1 (05991 254 48 150 136
32-295-1 (05001 194 53 156 85
32-300-1 102811 115 29 68 43
32-301-1 404831 159 52 143 73
32-302-1 (0409) 169 30 126 73
32-303-L 404541 153 32 110 62
32-305-1 403841 196 45 99 95
32-306-1 (0538) 236 59 ISO 135
32-307-1 (04531 192 37 114 102
32-308-1 405221 257 44 162 123
32-309-1 (04311 169 41 99 110 j
32-312-1 (04911 190 42 163 96
32-317-1 (05541 256 34 1,81 107
32-319-1 (0384) 142 SO 112 72
32-320-1 (03891 144 53 117 73
32-321-1 (0552) 247 51 185 100
32-323-1 (0695) 206 46 157 94
32-324-1 404901 178 42 128 87
32-325-1 (0524) 213 61 142 L22
32-327-L 406431 277 74 198 198
32-328-1 404711 207 45 132 113
32-329-1 (0577) 274 50 L69 130
32-330-L 405211 162 59 137 86
32-331-1 405241 243 44 155 129
32-332-t 104691 229 46 156 119
32-333-1 (0523) 225 95 143 126
32-334-1 (03661 159 48 100 98
32-335-L (06851 152 30 116 57
32-338-1 405751 146 24 116 49
32-339-1 (05521 110 33 98 52 I j
32-340-1 403471 141 51 135 58
32-341-L 104361 120 27 97 52
32-342-L (0464) 168 43 125 71
32-343-1 (05031 195 47 116 116
32-344-1 1104811 L86 38 137 86
32-349-L 406241 231 59 156 119
32-346-1 (0589) 265 49 176 133
32-347-1 405811 241 41 174 100
32-348-1 (OS211 225 44 139 123
32-349-L (03391 162 20 100 73
347 -
STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST-PRIMARY ELECTION-JUNE 3,1980
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL MEASURES
H J K L M N O O P O
I � _
ELECTION ,Y A m ` m o c - n d c c'
PRECINCTS i i .q c o
c w O
1 m 'o I - o o Q o c c d a u y u
_ _
m C U C 1 2 I c J c J O u
> o c n C I• -_
o o o ° a o¢ o o¢ oo = o o o
U J V J U Q Q ( V J O J U J U¢ LL LL U Q U
27 MEASURES Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No I Yes No Yes No Yes No I Yes No
32-350-1 107261 189 42 15L 71
32-35L-1 (0,451 189 44 139 93
32-352-1 104821 j j 211 58 208 63 I I
32-353-1 106221 I j 197 50 160 90
32-354-1 (05851 247 35 160 107
32-355-1 406711 I 279 45 184 L46
32-356-1 1 0475 1
126 39 119 50 I j
32-357-1 105021 I j 222 27 13♦ 106
32-358-1 4 0519 1
1233 47 154 123
32-359-1 (0515) L56 i 56 138 72
32-3t0-1 (C486) 183 42 137 84
32-361-L 10830) 1195 74 165 104
32-362-1 101251 j j I 65 9 34 32
32-3t3-1 (04451 153 63 114 92
32-3t4-L 10512) 251 26 164 109
32-365-1 (0499) 205 38 135 105
32-3b6-1 105121 162 48 130 73
32-367-1 (0442) 144 29 L04 62
32-3tB-1 403351 127 42 97 66
32-3b9-L 40254) I 68 221 59 31 j
32-370-1 105091 i 87 28 � 76 37 I I
32-371 1 (05t31 175 641 L24 110
32-373-L 104691 I I I 149 45j IL8 71 !
32-374-1 10042) 239 � 53 ' 202 91
32-375-1 IC4451 I 202 32�. 139 91
32-37b-1 104251 70 11 60 22
32-377-L 1051L1 L39 29 117 51
32-378-L (05391 106 21 85 39
1
32-379-1 104761 � I 1157I 33 L26 � 60
32-380-L 10,07) 181I 41 111 ; 109
32-382-1 (0327) 1118 23 71 66 1
32-383-L 105841 L2l 28I 110 37
32-385-L IC607) 145 461 99 81
32-386-1 (0"71 124 44 129 47
32-387-1 (0565) 102 38 130 74
32-388-1 105231 204 51 141 111
32-390-1 104071 207 35 134 90
32-391-1 104021 145 32i 97 80
32-392-1 104461 183 40 126 92 i
32-393-1 105251 216 54 L64 111
32-395-L 108981 186 45 150 80 I j
32-398-L 105311 140 45 112 71
32-400-1 105131 105 38 87 57
32-401-1 105231 252 34 162 115
31-402-1 104181 209 30 132 100
32-4C3-1 103841 185 36 100 115
32-405-1 (03911 77 29 75 33
32-407-1 (052U 205 51 140 109
32-408-1 105491 I 125 42 98 65
32-409-1 104821 2C7 41 138 105 j
32-410-1 402121 109 21 90 43
32-411-1 (1149 1
282 34j 170 134
32-411-2 (11491 270 49 162 144 j
32-412-1 10899) 182 30 144 64
j 32-412-2 (08991 216 23 143 95
32-413-1 10748) 280 60 186 14h
32-414-1 10486) 204 38 116 117 i
32-415-L (04571 217 29 153 87
33-115-1 (0412) 95 66
` 33- 7- 10428) 1L4 118
33-118-1 (05001 138 75
33-119-1 10381) 89 77
33-120-1 (0417) 99 71
33-121-1 404151 97 91
33-122-1 104331 106 59
33-123-1 105411 185 137
j 33-L25-1 103191 87 80
33-128-L (05541 134 93
33-129-1 40521) 148 140
33-L30-L 10329) 92 72
33-134-1 1 0189 1
67 60
j 48-140-L (0568) 170 162 83 195 162 132 157 133
48-141-1 4 0496 1 135 115 54 153 126I 1LC 123 113
48-142-1 104991 133 139 5e 168 1321 116 104 140
48-143-1 405111 90 116 41 126 L13 75 119 73
j 48-145-L 40672 1207 1501 91 1204 2271 L14 201 139
3" -
STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST—PRIMARY ELECTION—JUNE 3,1980
ORANGE COUNTY LOCAL MEASURES I H J K L M N 0 0 P 0
I r E
o
ELECTION I c x
PRECINCTS u O c o Q u 9 I F c
c c w _ c o m o o n
I j= C= Q= C D C C c Y C =
m U c $ �. o S V J c J c N N o.
j j o ;6
U J U J U Q Q U J U J U J U¢ LL Ll U Q U J
127 MEASURES Yes No Yes Na I Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No I I Yes No Yes No I
52-182-1 404221 147 74
52-1183-1 105471 148 105
52-184-1 104991 116 76
52-185-1 103351 86 62
52-186-1 10521) 133 87
52-188-1 10727) 233 172
52-189-1 408251 248 132
52-19C-L 0381) I 109 64 !
52-L91-1 104141 1L3 69I
52-L92-1 105921 114 46 j
52-193-1 105411 11 155 . 96 �1
52-194-1 105171 89I 611
52-195-1 IOo061 L40 75
52-197-1 104131 1271 66 I I
52-198-L 104701 1461 134
52-199-1 104341 136 108 `
52-2CO-1 404311 112 77
52-201-1 103661 ll7 62 I I I
52-2C3-L 105111 150 124
52-209-1 103861 9L 53 I I
52-210-1 104371 j 76 431
52-212-L 405241 I 115 571
52-213-1 103781 82 53
52-214-1 404051 107 9C1
52-215-1 (03101 I 55 54i
52-217-1 405521 149 66
51-218-1 104261 I 105 72
52-219-1 10566) 72 34
52-221-1 103531 90i 59
52-222-1 104431 88 48
52-225-1 107031 1711 183
I � j
I
j I
i I I it I
I i 1
I I
j I i i I
II I II
I
i i I
I
I
it i ;I
I I I
I
ICOUNTY TOTAL 5329 b977 7757 16261 4467 1139 4552 51211 134081. '3513
7932 113L5 13703 24212 619b 1451 4003 1963 i45151 430t
I
(ABSENTEE TOTAL 96 237 142 458 105 37 142 L61 1115 1124
20l 317 1023 659 164 28 125 89 139i 1241 I
IGRAND TOTAL 5425 7214 4726 7899 6719 6360 4572 1479 1176 4128 469412052 5282 4b5413523 ♦43C �3637
8133 1b32 4871
e�. - 350 -
iN THE
Superior Court
OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In and for the County of Orange
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH+ PROOF OF PUBLICATION
CITY CLERK
.Special Election Proposition ffLff
i
-i .:CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PARTICIPATION IN SPECIAL ELECTION ON
JUNE'3,1980 CALLED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY
,TO APPROVE RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FOR ELDERLY,
HANDICAPPED,LOW-OR MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS
++ PROPOSITION"L"
ARGUMENTS IN FAVO OF ARTICLE XH%IV R REFERENDUM
State of California ) The rising cost of housing has made it very difficult for many families,particu-
County of Orange )ss laxly-senioi citizens,W afford decent,safe'housing without sacrificing other essential
,items.Many are forced to spend a high percentage of their,incomes on housing which
is substandard.
Approval of this'measure will ea`able'private'developers to qualify for federal and
state housing funds to provide.good•quality new housing at rents which these lower
Rita J. Richter income persons can afford and to make older rental units livable again.
That I am and at all times herein mentioned Was a citizen of - -The use of these:programs requires no outlay of city or county funds and no added
the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I �.:'cost to the,tecfiords for this housing."
the*measure specifically,prohibits use of local general
am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; Of. . Approval U this'measure does not mean the City'must accept• all housing
that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the d y-proposed.The housing.must be designed to blend with the quality and style of private
}rousing in the neighborhoodiand it does not have to be in apartment tyre profits '
'-Notice of any hbusirg,propased would be ggirven;and.approval by the Cit Council at a
Huntington Beach Independent Review i pubbc.hearing'may be required, if'pubGC sentiment demands it.The amount of
housing is'limited to a small portion(5%)in the City.'
a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of
The,aaa ayers.of Orange County are already paying for state and federal housing
p
programs,while the money and benefits from many of these housing programs go to
other areas.Each year'the absence of Article XXXiV autJiority continues,the county
Huntington Beach loses apppproximately,two�million:'dollaie which otherwise would he available for
affordable housing..Peaemngg this ballot measure would enable Huntington Beach to get
Count of Orange and which newspaper is published for the their fair share of etate andaederal housing dollars
Y gP There is a press gneed for the'housing this measure,wiG provide.We strongly
disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- recommend approval of this proposition.
ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had ,Dated:April 22;.1980:. =
and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, RUTH BAILEY,Mayor
p P Y g RUTH E.FINLEY,Mayor Pro Tempore
and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- City of Huntington Beach
lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for V l PROPOSITION"L"
G7TY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the OF THE ELECTION.UNDERARTICLE34OF
annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in an supplement Before a.low'rent housing project can be developed,constructed,or acquired by a
Y PP ;•state PPublic body,'such as the Orange County Housing Authority;within a county or .
thereof,on the following dates,to wit: city;-ATticle 34 of.the California Constitution requires approval by a majority of the ;
u Voters of that county or'city.The Constitution defines such housing projects,in part,
as"any,development composed of. . . accommodations for persons of low
May 49 1980 income,financed in whole or in part by the federal government or a state public body
or to which the federal government or a state public tiady eatenda assistance,.. ."' I
Piopositibn"L"gives the voters of those Cities within Orange County which have
chosen,to.participate,n this election.under Article 34, an opportunity to decide
' whether such housing dial be provided,with-certain limitations as discussed below,
for the elderl ,handicapped,and other low income psi ors of the county or pertici-
pstiug'city.The decision oCthe,votere.of a participating city shall apply only within
that city. .
]f approved,this proposition imposes seyerai limitations on the production,of
1 such housing.The limitations are:
i.No city general fund money can be used.
I certify(or declare) under penalty of perjury that the forego- 2.:Notice of a specific,proposed project must,be given toeach'member oftbe City
in is true and correct. Council and to the public
g 3.Notice to the public must be.placed in an establiehed'oewspaper with the
Garden Grove greatest circulation within the area of the proposed boos project Site and must be
Dated at................................................ posted in at least three conspicuous places on the'ropoeed te:.
t .,, 4.If application to a noncounty body for funding o_r approval of such housing is to
be made, notice:to the Council and to the publicmust'be given'before such an
Calif nia, his h !80 j application forapproval or funding is made.
&The City Council must approve the proposed application and roject.
6.Approval by the City cil can occur in of two ways(a)A Council
member,within thirty days-of the notice,can.place tb'e'matter before the entire
... ........... { „Council and,after a public hearing,the Council can approve or conditionally approve
the project,or(b)if no Council member submits the_matter'to the'entire.Coancil for a
i nature public hearing within-thirty days of the'notice,the project is deemed approved..'
g 7.The total number of units,produced c amot'exceed five pereent•(5%)of the
total number of dwelling units within the city limit area
The cities participating in this'measure are:Anaheim,Buena Park,Cosfa Mesa,
! HuntingtoriBeach,La Habra,Los Alamitos,San Clemente,San Juan Capistrano and
Tuiitiri.
I
:Dated:April A-IM.
iGAIL HUTTON,City Attorney City of Huntington Beach,California !
PARTICIPACION DE LA CIUDAD DE HUNTINGTON-BEACH-, .'
`EN LA ELECTION ESPECIi1L DEL 3 DE JUNTO DE lee,
`PEDIDA POR LA JUNTA SUPERVLSORA DEL OONDADO DE ORANGE
j 'PARA APROVAR UN'DESARROLLO DE VWIENDAS DE ALQUWM
PARA PERSONAS MAYORES,EMPEDIDAS,'
�. O CON ING P�BAJOS O MODERADOS
M .
ARGUMENTOS A FAVOR DEL-REFERENDUM DEL ARTiCULO XXXIV
--- — -- -- — —i EI costo escalante de diviendas to he hecho'mu .difrc7 'y parsLque couches families,
peiticularmenti los ciudadanos mayores,'pued m afrontar viviendas seguras Sin sat-
tificar otras cocas esencialm Muchos estan forzades a gastar un porcentage alto de sus
ngiesos'en VMendas cuales son de collided inferior.
La�rovacron de ester medida permitiris yue urbeniiadores-privados aiGfiquen
Pare fo ,os deviviendas del gobierno fedarefy del estado Para proporcinow-viviendas
s de�bueni cabdad con rentae yua estea personae de ingresos bejos puedan afiontar,y
c,pars hater unidades de viviendas ores vrej a viytblee otrs vez
u '0 use de estos programer ea requirre'el'gasw do fondos de la ciudad W del
' condado al of aanmonto.de theta:al emtrmayeate.Por cierto que',Is medida se-
e x'pecificamente prohibe el use de fondos locales generales pars estas viviendas
La'aprovacion de tste medidi'no quiere'decir qua Is Ciudad tiene que amptar
todas las viviendas,propuestas..Las viviendm-tienen que ester disenadea pars'mea-
elarse"con Is calided y estilo de viviendas privadas an Is vecindad,y so times que sex
proyectos an eatilo de-a artmentos.Aviso.de-las yiviendos propu etas tiepe qua ser
dado;y aprovacion del Concilio Municipal durante una audiences publics'puede ear
requiridi, si el sentimiento publico to demands-La cantidad Se.viviendas'esta
Gmitada a une ppooicioii pequena,(el 5%)'en lo Ciudad
Los cont on del C6ndsdo de Orange ya estan pagando pox,prCgramae.de
"viviendas federalea y del estad'o,tmientras qua el dinem'y lee benefieiae dda muchos de
ealbe'pprrooggrrsmas de viviendas van a otras'areas..,Cada ano qua la aueenda de Is
autoridad'del Aiticulo.XXXIV-continua,•el'condedo,pierde,aprorimadamente doe
million de dolares'cu ales de otra manera wtuvieran disponibles pare,viviendas
afrontables La aprovacion de.esta medida do hal6i ppeeinntrie,quae Huntington Beach
reciba•eu parte jusfa de dohares'para vivii.t federates y del estado.. ' ' ':',,:
Eiisie una necesidad urgente'.pare lee viviendas que'esta medida proporcionaiie.-
Fuerteinente recomendamos aprovacion de estaproposidon. r
Fechado:22 de abril de 1980.< ;
RUTH BAILEY,Alcaldese "
RUTH E.FINLEY.Akaldesa Interim'
Ciudad de Huntington Beach
PROPOSICION"L"
..ANALYSIS BOARCLiL DE LA ABOGADA MUMCWAL
DE LA ELECTION BAJO EL ARTICULO 34
DE LA CONSTTTUCION DE CALIFORNIA "
Antes que un proyecto de viviendas de rentas hsjas pueda ser deaerrollado,
construido,o adquirido por un cuerpo publico del estado,tail como Is Autoridad de
Viviendas del Condado de Orange,dentro de un condado o una Ciudad,el Articulo 34
de Is Constitucion.requiere aprovacion por Is mayoria de too votantesde ese condado o
aces ciiidad. Ls constitution.defna tales proyectos de viviendas,.an parts, Como
"cualquier urbanization compuesta de. . .acomodadon de viviendas pare personae
de ingreios bajos;financiado completamente.o an parte por el gobierno federal o un
cuerpo publico del estado o uno a coal el gobierbo federal o el cuerpo publico del
seta o Is extiende asistencia.
r -La'Propocision"L"Is des a lee votantes de seas ciudades dentro del Condado de
"'Orange cuales ban escogido'participar an sets election bajo at Articulo 34, una
bpohuhidad.de decir si tales viviendas wren proporcionadas,con ciertes limitations
^discuitdas mas abajo,pars los mayores de edad,empedides,y otras•personas con
ingresca bajos del'condado o Ciudad participants.La decision de Its votontes de una
Ciudad participants splicers solo dentro de esa Ciudad.
•Si es aprovada,esta proposrcioaimpone varias limitations sobre Is production de
tales viviendas.Las limitation son:
�+ ",t.Ningun•dinero del fondo general de Is Cudad puede ser usado.
r c'_o.2.'Aviso de..un proyecto espeCifico propueato se le tiene que Aar a cada
miembro del Concilio.Municipal y al publico. '
r
h 3.,EI,aviso al;publico se tiene que poner en un.penodico establecido con Is
r circulation mas grande dentro de Is area del Sitio del proyecto de viviendas
propuegio. .
:"4.Si nine aplicacion es becha con un cuIerpo cual no es del oondado,pare
u' tondos o aprovacion de tales viviendas,un aviso all Concilio Municipal y al
publico tiene que ser dodo antes que tal aplicscion Para aprovadon'o
fondos sea hecha: "
S..:EI�Con8ho Municipal tfece' ue a rover lo a Gcecioo el. ro ecto.:
Q p P Y P y /
propuesto.
&.La aprovacion del'Concilio Municipal puede ocuar.en una odor maneras:
(a)Un miembro del Concilio,dentro de treinta dine del.eviso,.puede poner.
el asunto frente todo el Concilio y,despues de una audencia publics,el
Concilio puede aproar o condicionalmente,aprovar el proyocto•o(b)Si
ningun'miembro del Concilio somete el asunto frente todo el Cone io Para
iudiencia public&dentro de treiwa dies despues del aviso,el proyecto se
considers estar aprovado.' '
r
IN THE
Superior Court
OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In and for the County of Orange
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH+ CITY CLERK
PROOF OF PUBLIT TION
Special Election Notice
` SPECIAL M UNICIPAL N OF THE CITY OF HONTINGTON BEACIR
TO BE HELD JUNE 3,1980 W MT HE STATE PRIMARY
OPOSITION'K'
State of California ) ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF ADVISORY SALES TAR PROPOSITION
County of Orange )ss' Want to send a message to Sacramento?Then vote YES on Proposition K!Ask
yourself,what public services are of the greatest importance to you?
Rita J. Richter Police protection
Fire protection?,
Libraries?
Parks and Recreation?
That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of All these services are provided by local government and essential to a good quality
the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I of life.
am not a art to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; Certainly they are of far greater value than those championed by overstaffed state
party and federal bureaucracies,which produce questionable benefits to the public while
that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the unquestionably devouring your tax dollar..,
Did you know that the state collects locally a 6%,sales tax,yet returns only
slightly more than I%?The rest stays'in Sacramento where a budget surplus has
Huntington Beach Independent Review proven to be an irresistible temptation for Sacramento politicians to underwrite their
pet projects.
a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of - Yet,local government isrfaced with having to reduce or hold the line on these
most important public services.
It'simply does not make senae!
Huntington Beach Proposition K.tells Sacramento it had better get'the priorities straight, and
'address our most critical needswithout increasing the tax burden., ,
County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the Sacramento be returned proposes some of that money that now goos to and is spent in
government so that city and county government does
disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- not have to be concerned with providing you with the kind of police and fire protection
ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had or other critical services you need and deserve.
and still`has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, Remember that our spending limit and that proposed under the"Spirit:of 13"
P P Y g initiative requires that any extra revenue would have to be returned to you,or be used
and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- for much needed public improvements.
lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a 'To assure essential local services,to reduce that surplus in Sacramento,vote for
local control and for Proposition K.'
period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the Dated:April I,1980.
annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular DON,MacALLISTER
and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement 'City of Huntington Beach Mayor
j
thereof,on the following dates,to wit: ROBERT MANDIC,JR.
Mayor Pro Tem
City of Huntington Beach
PROPOSITION K
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS SALES TAR ADVISORY PROPOSITION
May 1! 1980 The sales tax advisory proposition proposes that the goveroor'and legislature
,adopt legislation to apportion the existing 6%.sales and use ta:so that 2 cents rather
than 1'/i cents presently allocated;be returned to local goveramenta.
The effect of the adoption of Ruch legislation would be for.the state government to
incur a substantial reduction of its revenues and the local governments to reap a
substantial increase in their.revenues with the total amount of the sales tax remaining
tbe same.
Currently the City of Huntington Beach ie'ceives 1 cent of the I%eenta with the
County,of Orange receiving the remainder...
I certify(or declare) under penalty of perjury that the forego- Adoption of the proposition would be advisory only and a reflection of the will of
ing is true and correct. the electorate
his city.
Dated:April t18,1980. -
GAIL HUTTON
Dated at................Ga n•Gr•aV e............... pity Attorney
City of Huntington Beach
Cali or a, s 15 t ay of Y....$019........ ELLECCION MUNICIPAL ESPECIAL DE LA CIUDAD DE BUNTINGTON BEACH .
LA CUAL TENDRA LUGAR EL 3 DE JUNIO DE 1980
-
CON LA ELECCION PRNARIA DEL ESTADO
PROPOSITION`"K
... ARGUMENTO A FAVOR DE LA PROPOSICION "
CONSEJERA DE DNPUESTOS SOBRE YENTAS•
Signature Quiere,mandar un menage a Sacramento?Entonces vote SI sobre Ia Proposition
K Preguntese,cuales servicios publicos sonde man importancia para Ud..
Protection de Policia?
Protection dye Bomberos?
Bibliotecas?
Parquesy Recreo?
Todos estoe servicios son proporcionsdos por,el gobierno local y e'senciales pars
-Una buena calidad de vida
Seguramegte son de mucho mas valor que e8m apoyadce por las burocracias del
eetado y federal con demasiado personal, cuales,producen beneficios dddosos al
publico,mientras que sin duda devorau sus dolares de impuestos.
Sabia'Ud.qua el'estado recauda locelmente un impuesto sabre ventas del 6%,y
sin embargo solo regress un poao mas del 1%?El resto quads en Sacramento donde el
bulto del-presupuesto a provado ser una tentacion irresistible'para los politicos de
Sacramento pars subscribir sus proyeet6i favoritos.
Sin embargo,el gobierno local as enfrenta con tener qua reducir o mantener la o.CAF-6579
lines de estos seivicits publicos tan importantes.
-- - - - - Esto simplemento no tiene buen juicio! - --
La Proposition K Is dice a Sacramento qque eerie bueno que ponge'sus prioridades
en linen,y se dirija hacia nuestras necesidades mas critical sin aunmentar el peso de,
los impuestos.
La Proposition K propone que un poco de ese dinero cual ahora va a Sacramento
y es gastado alli'sea regres ido al gobierno local pars que'el gbbierno del condado-y do
Ia.ciudad no se tenga que preocupar pare proporcionarle a Ud. con las class de
protection de policia y de bomberos o otros servicios criticos cuaks Ud.uecesita y
mereoe.
Recuerde,que nueetro limite.de.gastos y ese propuesto bajo la initiativa del
"Espiritu de 13"requiere que cualquier ingreso extra tendria que ser regresado a Ud.;
o ser usado pare mejoras publican cualea son de gran necesidad.
'Para asegurar servicios locales esenciales,pars reducir ese exceso en Sacramento;
vote pare control local y pars la Proposition K.'
/ DON MacALLISTER
Alcalde
Ciudad de Huntington Beach
ROBERT MANDIC,JR.
Alcalde Interino
Ciudad de Huntington Beach
PROPOSICION"K"
ANALLSiS IMPARCIAL
PROPOSICION CONSEJERA DE WUESTOS SOBRE YENTAS
L'a•proposicion conaoera de impuestoe sabre ventas propone que el gobernador y
la legislatura adopten legislation para'repartir el 6%de impuestos sobre ventas y uRos
existente pare,que 2 centavos en hrgar del 1'ii-centavo actualmente aloce o sea
regresado a gobiernoe locales.
EI•efecto de la adoption,de tal Is islatura ser'ia que el,gobierno del estado
incurriria Una reduction substantial de sus ingresce,.y el gobierno lace]obtendria un
aunmento substantial en sus ingrews con la cantidad total de impuestos sobre ventas
quedando ingual. • .
Actualmente la Ciudad de Huntington Beach,recive 1 centavo del P/i centavo con
el Condado de Orange recibiendo el resto.
La adoption de.la proposition seria solo consejera y una refleccion.del electorado
de eats cudad.
�- GAIL HUTTON
Abogada Municipal
Ciudad de Huntington Beach
Pub.May 1,1980
\\ P,•:f R�_s,T",1 R� rttwoe ram '
IN THE
Superior Court
OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In and for the County of Orange
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CITY CLERK
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
Special Election Notice
CITY OF HUNTQVCTON BEACH PARTICIPATION IN SPECIAL ELECTION ON .
JUW,%1980 CALLED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY
State of California ) ij�,TO APPROVE RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FOR ELDERLY,
County of Orange )ss f HANDICAPPED,LOW=ORMODERAT&INCOME PERSONS
PROPGS070N"L"..
!�n ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF ARTHS.E'XXM REFERENDUM
Rita J. Richter Me tieing:coat of.housing.has made it very difficult for many families,pertica-
lad eeni4:citvens,to afford dacent,,eafe holism icing.other'eeeentialv .
iteas.;Many are forced to spend,a high percentege,of their incomes on housing which
That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of ! isstibstandard , - � •
;, proval 4 this measure will enable prnete developers to quah for feiters)and
the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I otete Housing funds w prohde gpod yuelity.cew;housin at rents which these lower
am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; income persons inn afford and to make older tental unite livable again.
that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the -The use of these programs requires no outlay of city of county funds and no added
case 96 the taxpayer.In fact,the measure speeifeally•prdhibits use.of local general
funs for this 4ousins..,
Huntington Beach Independent Review ;Approval of"this measure!does not mean•the.City must accept all'housing,
Ming
The housing must be designed to blend with the quality and style of private'
lausmg m the neighboihood and it does.9 heve'-to be in apartment type prop'"
a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of Notice of any housing lroposed would be n,sod"approval.by the City Council at a
Huntington Beach public hearing may l p required,if public sentiment demands it The amount of
housing is limited to a small portion(b%)in the City.
The tazpeyers of Orange County.are already paying for state and federel'houeing
pro�rems„while the mooey'end''becefite from many of these houeiub programs go to
County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the other areas.Eecliyear the absence.of Airticle XXXIV authority continues,the county'
disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- 'eppppro iroately two million,dollars which otherwise would be available for
ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had affotdable Housing:Pseeing this ballot measure would enable Huntington Beach to get
theii fair share of"state and federal'housing dollars.
and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, There is a pressing need for the housing this measure will provide.We strongly
and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- recommend approval of thus propoe'f°a
feted:April 22;i980_;...
lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange fora y. RUTH BAD EY
period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the "i ,Mayor
annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular aid R. "'E Pro
TilFINLEY
Mayor Pio Tempbre,
and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement ; City of Huntington Beach
.
thereof,on the following dates,to wit: 'PROP09IT10N"L"
.Sin CITY ATTORNEYS IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
ii g OF THE ELECTION UNDER ARTICLE 34 OF,
1 u n! ".�THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
April 24+ 1980 More low rent housing project can be developed,constructed,or acquired by a
etat ' iblic.body,such as the Orange County Housing Authority,within a county or
city;4iticle 34'of the California Constitution requires approval by a majority of the
voters pf diet county or city.The Constitution defines such.b projects,m part,
as".any development composed of. . .Hw�g aocommodetions for persons of,low
income;financed in whole or,in part by the federal goveramsot or a state publicbody
or tit wlikh'the federal government or a state public body extends assistance.. ."
f%position"L"gives the voters of those,cities within Orange County which have
choAWto participate in this electio$'under Article 34,an opportunity to decide
j wheel such housing shall be provided with'certain limitations as discussed below,
I certify for declare) under penalty of perjury that the forego- for the elderly,•handicapped,and other low,income persons of the,county or partici-;
F patins.city.The decision of the voters of a participating city&hall apply only within
ing is true and correct. that'city.
If approved,this proposition®poses aeveral limitations-on the production of
D4ateda ...... .....Ga r.d e n.G rn v E................ i sue housing.The limitations are: 1
�3.,No city general fund money can be used. ,
24t h A P r i 80 r 2.,Notice of a specific,proposed project must be'given to each member of the City
Council and to the ppublic. 4
Ct ....... of ....... ;3. Notice to the ubI muat'P placed in an.established newspaper with thel
�' PP h P posed project sitesleet cvculetion within the area of the and must be
posfed in at least three conspicuous laceson p. ... . ........... ...... ,4.If application to.a noncoun body for funding or approval of such ho - is tot
. .. .. using f
be invade, notice to the Council and to the public must be given before aVu an,
Signature apoication for approval orfunding is made. .: :: - -' *.
m. The City Council must approve the proposed application and project"
46:Approval by the'City Council.can occur,in one of two ways.(a)A Council.
me
mber;within thirty days of the"notice,can place the matter before the entire)
Council end,after a public hearing,the Council.can approve or conditionally approve
(' the project or(b)if no Council member submits the matter to the entire Council for a
public earing,within'tbirty days of the notice,the project is deemed approved.
7.The total number of,units piroduced,cannot exceed five percent(5%)of the
total number'ofdwelling units within the city limit area
The cities participating in this measure are:Anaheim,Buena Park,Costa Mesa,
Huntington Beach,La Habra,Los Alamitos,San Clemente,San Juan Capistrano and
Tustin.... .
Dated:April 23,1980.
GAIL HUTTON,City Attorney
City of Huntington Beach,California
1 Pub.Api..24,'980
Hunt Beach"Ind Rev'#10968 •AF-6579
IN THE
1`
Superior Court
OF THE.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA .
In and for the County of Orange
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY CLERK
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
Special Election Notice
State of California ) �— SPECIALMUNICIPALELECTION;Ur'THKUTYUFHVNTDYGTON'BEAC1I
.)' TORE FM D JUNE 3;1980 WITH THE STATE PRUAARY
County of Orange ,
9s. ; n PROPOSITION"H"
mARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF ADVISORY SALES TAR PROPOSITION
Want:to'send a message to Sacramento?Then vote YES on Proposition K!Ask
Rita J. Richter yourself;what public services are of the greatest importance to you?
po ' protection?
) protection?
That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of ) Dries?
the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that[ Pecks and Recreation?
AMhese services are provided by local government and essential to a good quality
am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; of life.-
that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the ClRainly they are of far greater value than those championed by overstaffed state
and feWit bureaucracies,which produce questionable benefits to the public while
unqu 6nably devouring your tax dollam
Huntington Beach Independent Review r D know that the state collects locally a.6% sales tax t returns only
slightlymore than 1%?The rest stays in Sacramento where a budget surplus has
a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of provenAn bean irresistible temptation for Sacramento politicians-to-underwrite their
pet protects;t
j Y ocel government is faced with having;to reduce.br hold the line on;these
Huntington Beach most; rientpublicservice& :. ;
It ply does not make sense!
P ition K tells Sacramento it had better.:get.tlie priorities straight,+and
County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the addresr'ipost critical needs without increasing tot talc b den.a
disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- 1 Proposition K propose, no""
g g P poses that come of that money that.now'goes�to and is spent.in
ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had S ,ye returned to local government so that city end cod. ygovernment does
not�be concerned with provid' you with thelkind of police and`fire•piotection
and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, orothif.tfitical services you need and eserve. `S
and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- I .Reiriember that our spending limit and that proposed under,the"Spirit of 13"
lished at regular intervals in the said Count of Orange for a initiative requires that any extra revenue would have to be returned to you,or be used
g y g for mudh-deeded public improvements
period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the To'assure essential local services,to reduce that surplus in Sacramento,vote for
annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular local control and for Proposition K.
and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement Dated:April 1,1980.
thereof,on the following dates,to wit: Mayor
DON
City of Huntington Beach
ROBERT MANDIC,JR.
Mayor Pro Tern
April 24 1980 City of Huntington Beach
PROPOSITION K
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS—SALES TAX ADVISORY PROPOSITION
The sales tax advisory proposition proposes that the,governor and legislature
adopt legislation to apportion the existing 6%sales and use tax so that 2 cents rather
Ulan 1 yi cents presently allocated,be returned to local governments-
The effect of the adoption of such legislation would be for the state government to
incur a substantial reduction of its revenues and the local governments to reap a
substaptial increase iri their revenues with the total amount of the sales tax remaining
the same. '
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the forego- Currently the City of Huntington Beach"receives'f Bent of the lb,cents with the
in is true and correct. Countyy of Orange receiving the remainder.
g Adooption of the piopeeition would be advisory,only and a reflection of the will of
the electorate of this city.
Dated at...............Gard en..Gro>ve...............
Dated{April 18,19M.
24t h P r iA 80 City tto-ey
7 �, •, City Attorney.,
California.C is .. .....d of ....... ` C tmgton Beach
City of Hun
Pub.Apr:24;1980 '
Hunt Beach,Ind Rev#10994
Signature
Form No.CAF-6579
• _i ,•
t r�
IN THE
Superior Curt
OF THE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In and for the County of Orange
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH9 CITY CLERK
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
Notice to Electors.
NOTICE TO ELECTORS OF DATE AFTER WHICH NO ARGUMENTS
FOR OR AGAINST A CITY MEASURE MAY BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
(NOTICIA A ELECTORES ACERCA DE LA FECHA DESPUES DE LA QUE
NINGUNOS ARGUMENTO6 PRO O CONTRA UN PROYECPO MUNICIPAL
State of California ) PUEDEN SER SOMETIDOS AL SECRETARIO MUNICIPAL)
County of Orange )ss.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the General Municipal Election is to be,held
in the City of Huntington Beach on June 3,1980,at which there will be submitted to
Rita J. Richter the qualified electors of said City the following measure:
Advisory Vote Only
That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of ADVISORY PROPOSITION;
the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I That ihe Governor and
am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; i Legislature apportion the
that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the existing six cent sales and YES
P P P i use tax so that two cents
- rather than the one cent
present)y allocated,may
Huntington Beach Independent Review fousedbyllocalsrvices
for priority local services
a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of rather than state distribu- NO
'lion or state reserves.
Huntington Beach
County of Orange and which newspaper is published for the
disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to Article 4,Chapter 3,Division 5
ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had of the Elections Code of the State of California,the legislative body of said City,or
i any member or members thereof authorized by such body,or any individual voter or
and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, bona fide association of citizens,or'any combination of such voters and associations,
and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub- may file a written argument,not to exceed 300 words in length,for or against said City
regular intervals in the said Count of Orange for a measure.
lished at re
K Y K NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that,based upon thettime reasonably necessary
period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the to prepare and print the arguments and sample ballots for said election,the City Clerk
annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular has fixed March 28,1980,as a reasonable date prior to such election after which no
arguments for or against said City measure maybe submitted to her for printing and
and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement distribution to the voters as provided in said Article 4.Arguments shall be submitted
thereof,on the following dates,to wit: to the City Clerk at the City Hall, P.O. Box 190, Huntington Beach, California.
Arguments may be changed or withdrawn until and including said date fixed by the i
City Clerk.
(NOTICIA SE DA ESTE MEDIC qque tendra lugar Is General Election Municipal
March 9 v 1980 en Is Ciudad de Huntington Beach el dial de Junio,1980,en la quo sera sometido a
los electores calificados de susodicha Ciudad el siguiente, proyeeto Municipal):
Voto Solo Consejero
PROPOSICION CONSEJERA:
Que el Gobernador Is
Legislatura repartan el t
impuesto existente sobre sl
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the forego- ventas y usos pare que.
in is true and correct. dos centavos en lugar
g Garden Grove de on centavo actualmente
alocado,pueda ser usado
Dated at........................ .... ................. por agencies locales para
servicios locales de prio-
ridad en lugar de distribu- NO
Ca'f nia h ..1Q.,. y o .d I' h .... ... le reserrva del estadlu era
... . .. .... ... .. ... ... . ...
(NOTICIA ADEMAS SE DA qua de acuerdo con el Articulo 4. Capitulo 3.
Division 5 del codigo de Elections del Estado de California,el cuerpo legislativo de
Signature I dicha Ciudad,o cualquier socio de socios de eso autorizados por dicho cuerpo, o
cuslquier votante individual o bona fide asociacion de ciudadanos,o cualquier combi-
nation de tales votantes y asmiaciones,puede registrar on argumento escrito,que'no
excedera 300 palabras de largura,pro o contra dicho proyecto Municipal.)
(NOTICIA ADEMAS SE DA que,basada sobre el tiempo razonablemeute nece.
sario para preparar a imprimir low argumentos y las balotas muestra pars dicha
election,el Secretario Municipal ha fi'ad tos o el dia 28 de Mario,1980,Como una fecha
razonable anterior a dicha election Tespues de Is que ningunos argumen pro o
contra dicho proyecto Municipal pueden ser sometidos a ells pare impresion y
distribution Ins votantes Como provisto en dicho Articulo 4.Argumentos deben ser
sometidos at Secretario Municipal en el Ayuntamiento,Caja Postal 190,Huntington
Beach,California.Los Argumentos peuden ser cambiados o retirados hasta y incluy-
endo dicha fecha fi'ada por el Secretario Municipal.)
ABOVE NOT CE GIVEN by me this 6 day of March,1980.
(LA YA MENCIONADA NOTICIA DADA por mi este die 6 de Mario.1980.)
Dated:March 6,1980
(Fecha:de 6 de Mario.1980) F-6579
STATEMENT OF AUTHOR OF ARGUMENT
All arguments concerning measures filed pursuant to Division 5,
Chapter 3 (beginning with Section 4000) of the Elections Code, shall
be accompanied by the following form statement, to be signed by each
author of the argument:
The undersigned authors of the primary argument in favor of
the ballot proposition relative to the "Sales Tax Advisory
Proposition" at the Special Municipal Election to be consolida-
ted with the State Primary Election in the County of Orange to
be held on June 3, 1980, hereby state that such argument is
true and correct to the best of their knowledge and belief.
Si ned Date
Do MacAllister
&a v�, -- L 3-
Robert P. Mandic, Jr.
PROPOSITION K
IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS '- SALES TAX ADVISORY PROPOSITION
The sales tax advisory proposition proposes that the governor and legislature
adopt legislation to apportion the existing 6% sales and use tax so that 2 cents
rather than 1-1/4 cents presently allocated, be returned to local governments.
The effect of the adoption of such legislation would be for the state government 1
to incur a substantial reduction of its revenues and the local governments to �I
reap a substantial increase in their revenues with the total amount of the sales j
tax remaining" the same.
Currently the City of Huntington Beach receives 1 cent of the 1-1/4 cents with
the County of Orange receiving the remainder.
Adoption of the proposition would be advisory only and a reflection of the will
of the electorate of this city.
Gail Hutton
City Attorney
City of Huntington Beach
� y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PARTICIF DN
IN SPECIAL ELECTION ON JUNE 3. 1980 CALLED
BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY
TO APPROVE RENTAL HOUSIXG DEVELOPMENT FOR ELDERLY,
HANDICAPPED. LOW-OR-MODERATE INCOME PERSONS
PROPOSITION "L"
ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF ARTICLE XXXIV REFERENDUM
The risibg -cost of housin has 'made it very difficult for
many families, particularly senior citizens, to afford
decent, safe housing without sacrificing other essential
items. Many are forced to spend a high percentage of their
incomes on housing which is substandard.
Approval of this measure will enable private developers to
qualify for federal and state housing funds to provide good'
quality new housing at rents which these lower income persons
can afford and to make older rental units livable again.
The use of these programs requires no outlay of city or
county funds and no added cost to tlie. taxpayer. In fact,
the measure specifically pro is use of local general
funds for this housing.
Approval of this .measure does not mean the City must accept
all housing proposed. The housing must be designed to blend
with the quality and style of private housing in the neighbor-
hood and it does not have to be in apartment type projects .
Notice of any housing proposed would be given, and approval
by the City Council at a public hearing may be required, if
public sentiment demands it. The amount of housing is'
.limited to .a . small portion (51) in the
G. y
'The taxpayers of Orange County are already paying for state
and federal housing .programs, while the money and benefits
from many .of these housing programs go to other areas . Each
year the absence of Article XXXIV authority continues , the
county loses approximately two million dollars which other
wise would be available for affordable housing. Passing this
ballot measure would enable Huntington Beach to get their fair
share of state and federal housing dollars .
There.. is a pressing need for the . housing this measure will
provide. We strongly recommend"approval of this proposition.
RUTH BAILEY
MAYOR
Dated: April 22, 1980 RUTH E. F.INLEY
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
4a .L NUYPP_f>P_;F_
PROPOSITION "L"
CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
OF THE ELECTION UNDER ARTICLE 34 OF
THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Before a low rent housing project can be developed,
constructed, or acquired by a state public body; such as the
Orange County Housing Authority, within a county or city,
Article 34 of the California Constitution requires approval
by a majority of . the voters of that county or city. The Con-
stitution defines such housing projects , in part , as "any
development composed of. . . living accommodations for persons
of low income, financed in whole or in part by the federal
government or a state public body or to which the federal
government or a state public body extends assistance . . . . "
Proposition "L" gives the voters of those cities within .
Orange County which have chosen to participate in this election
under Article 34 , an opportunity to decide whether such housing
shall be provided, with certain limitations as discussed below,
s
for the elderly, handicapped, and other low income persons of
the county or participating .city. The decision of the voters
of a participating city shall apply only within that city.
If approved, this proposition imposes several limitations
on the production of such housing. The limitations are :
1 . No- city general fund money can be used.
2. Notice of a specific , proposed project must be given
to each member of the City Council and to the public .
1.
3. Notice to the public must be placed in an established
newspaper with the greatest circulation within the area of the
proposed housing project site and must be posted in at least
three conspicuous places on the proposed site.
4 . If application to a noncounty body for funding or
approval of such housing is to be made, notice to the Council
and to the public must be given before such an application for
approval or funding is made.
5. The City Council must approve the proposed application
and project .
6. Approval by the City Council can occur in one of two
ways : (a) A Council member, within thirty days' of the notice,
can place the matter before the entire Council and, after a
public hearing, the Council can approve or conditionally ap-
prove the project , or (b) if no Council member submits the
matter to the entire Council for a public hearing within thirty
days ' of the notice, the project is deemed approved.
7. The total number of units produced cannot exceed five
percent (5ro) of the total number of dwelling units within the
city limit area.
The cities participating in this measure are : Anaheim,
Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach, La Habra, Los Alamitos,
San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano and Tustin.
GAIL HUTTON, City Attorney
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Dated: April 23, 1980
PARTICIPACION DE LA CIUDAD DE HUNTINGTON BEACH
EN LA ELECCION ESPECIAL DEL 3 DE JUNIO DE 1980
PEDIDA POR LA JUNTA SUPERVISORA DEL CONDADO DE ORANGE
PARA APROVAR UN DESARROLLO DE VIVIENDAS DE ALQUILER
PARA PERSONAS MAYORES , EMPEDIDAS ,
0 CON INGRESOS BAJOS 0 MODERADOS
PROPOSICION "L"
ARGUMENTOS A FAVOR DEL REFERENDUM DEL ARTICULO XXXIV
E1 costo escalante de viviendas to ha hecho muy dificil para
que muchas familias , particularmente los ciudadanos mayores ,
puedan afrontar viviendas seguras sin sacrificar otras cosas
esenciales . Muchos estan forzados a gastar un porcentage alto
de sus ingresos en viviendas cuales son de calidad inferior .
La aprovacion de esta medida permitiria que urbanizadores pri-
vados califiquen para fondos de viviendas del gobierno federal
y del estado para proporcionar viviendas de buena calidad con
rentas que estas personas de ingresos bajos puedan afrontar , y
para hacer unidades -de -viviendas ma's viejas vivibles otra vez .
E1 use de estos. programas no requiere el gasto de fondos de la
ciudad ni del condado ni el aunmento de costos al contribuyente .
Por cierto que la medida especificamente prohibe el use de fon-
dos locales generales para estas viviendas .
La aprovacion de esta medida no quiere decir que la Ciudad tiene
que aceptar todas las viviendas propuestas . Las viviendas tie-
nen que estar disenadas para mezclarse con la calidad y estilo
de viviendas privadas en la vecindad, y no tienen que ser pro-
yectos en estilo de apartamentos . Aviso de las viviendas pro-
puestas tiene que ser dado , y aprovacion del Concilio Municipal
durante una audiencia publica puede ser requirida, si el senti-
miento publico to demanda. La cantidad de viviendas esta limi-
tada a una porcion. pequena (el 50) en la ciuda.d.
Los contribuyentes del Condado de Orange ya estan pagando por
programas de viviendas federales y del estado , ,mientras que el
dinero y los beneficios de muchos de estos programas de vivien-
das van a otras areas . Cada aflo que- la ausencia - de la autoridad
del Articulo XXXIV continua, el condado pierde aproximadamente
dos millones de dolares cuales de otra manera estuvieran disponi-
bles nara viviendas afrontables . La aprovacion de esta medida de
balota permitiria que Huntington Beach reciba su parte justa de
dolares para viviendas federales y del estado .
Existe una necesidad urgente para las viviendas que esta medida
proporcionaria. Fuertemente recomendamos aprovacion de esta
proposicion.
RUTH. BAILEY
ALCALDESA
Fechado : 22 de abril de 1980 RUTH E. FINLEY
ALCALDESA INTERINA
Ciudad de Huntington Beach
PROPOSICION "L"
ANALISIS IMPARCIAL DE LA ABOGADA MUNICIPAL
DE LA ELECCION BAJO EL ARTICULO 34
DE LA CONSTITUCION DE CALIFORNIA
Antes que un proyecto de viviendas de rentas bajas pueda
ser desarrollado, construido , o adquirido por un cuerpo pGblico
del estado; tal como la Autoridad de Viviendas del Condado de
Orange , ,.dentro de un condado o una ciudad, el Articulo 34 de
la Constitucibn requiere aprovacion por la mayoria de los vo-
tantes de ese condado o esa ciudad. La constitucion defina
tales proyectos de viviendas , en parte , como "cualquier urba-
nizacion compuesta de acomodaciones de viviendas para
personas de ingresos bajos, financiado completamente o en par-
te por el. gobierno federal o un cuerpo pGblico del estado o
uno a cual el gobierno federal o el cuerpo pGblico del estado
le extiende. asistencia .
La Propo.sicion "L" l.e da a los votantes de esas ciudades
dentro del Condado de Orange cuales han escogido participar en
esta eleccibn bajo el Articulo 34 , una oportunidad de decir si
tales viviendas seran proporcionadas , con ciertas limitaciones
discuitdas mas abajo, para los mayores de edad, empedidos , y
otras personas con ingresos bajos del condado o ciudad parti-
cipante. La decision de los votantes de una ciudad partici-
pante aplicar$ solo dentro de esa ciudad.
Si es aprovada, esta proposicion impone varias limitacio-
nes sobre la produccibn de tales. viviendas . Las limitaciones
son:
1 . NingGn dinero del fondo general de la ciudad
puede ser usado.
2 . Aviso de un proyecto especifico propuesto se
le tiene que dat a cada miembro del Concilio
Municipal, y al pGblico .
3. E1 aviso al pGblico se tiene que poner en un
periodico establecido con la circulacion mas
grande de.ntro de la area del sitio del pro-
yecto de viviendas propuesto.
4. Si una aplicaci6n es hecha con un cuerpo cual
no es del condado para fondos o aprovaci6n
de tales viviendas , un aviso al Concilio Mu-
nicipal y al pfiblico tiene que ser dado antes
que tal aplicaci6n para aprovaci6n o fondos
sea hecha.
S. El Concilio Municipal tiene que aprovar la
aplic'aci6n y el proyecto propuesto.
.6. .: La aprovaci6n del Concilio Municipal puede
:;;ocu.rtir ,eh una o dos maneras (a) Un m
b iem-
ro del Concilio, dentro de treinta dias del
aviso, puede poner el asunto frente todo el
Concilio y, despu6s de una audiencia pfiblica,
el Concilio puede aprovar o condicionalmente
aprovar. el proyecto; o (b) ' Si ningun miembro.
del Concilio somete el asunto frente todo el
-Concilio para audiencia pfiblica dentro de
treinta dias despu6s del aviso , el ,proyecto
se considera estar .aprovado.
7. E1 nGmero total de unidades producidas no
puede e.xceder el cinco porciento (So) del
-nfimero total de unidades 'de viviendas dentro
de la-. ir' ea del ' lfmite de la ciudad.
Las ciudades, participando en esta medida son: Anaheim,
Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach, La Habra, Los Ala-
mitos , San Clemente , San Juan Capistrano y Tustin.
GAIL HUTTON
Abogada Municipal
ELECCION MUNICLPAL ESPECIAL OE LA CLUDAD DE HUNTINGTON BEACH
F �
c ° " LA'CUAL TENDRA L-UGAR EL .3 DE JUNIO ,jjE'1980
CON LA ELECCION PRIMARIA DEL ESTADO
PROPOSITION "K"
AKGUMENTO A FAVOR DE LA PROPOSICION
CONSE-JERA DE IMPUESTOS SOBRE YENTAS ,
,;alaaiere mandar un mensage a Sacramento? lEntonces vote SI sobre
I ca I'roposici6n _! Pregfintese, LcuAles servicios p6blicos son
ale m5s importancia Para Ud. ?
;.Protecci6n de Policfa?
41)rotecci6n de Bomberos?
LBibli_otecas?
zParques y Recreo?
'Vodos estos servicios son proporcionados por el gobierno local y
esenciales Para una buena calidad de vida.
Seguramente son de mucho nlis valor que esos apoyados por las buro-
cracias del estado y federal con demasiado personal , cuales produ-
cers beneficios dudosos al pfiblico, mientras que sin duda devoran
sus d6lares de impuestos .
LSabfa Ud. que el estado recauda localmente un impuesto sobre yen-
tas del 61 , y sin embargo solo regresa un 'poco ma's del li? E1 resto
queda en Sacramento donde el bulto del presupuesto a provado ser
una tentaci6n irresistible Para los politicos de Sacramento Para
subscribir sus proyectos favoritos.
5ia► embargo, el gobierno local se enfrenta con terser que reducir
o mantener la linea de estos servicios pOblicos tan importantes.
iUsto simplemente no tiene buen juicio!
La Proposici6n K le dice a Sacramento que serfa bueno que ponga
sus prioridades en linea, y se dirija hacia nuestras necesidades
m5s crfticas sin aunmentar el peso de los impuestos.
La Proposicift - _ propone que un poco a ese dinero cual ahora
va a Sacramento y es gastado allf sea regresado al gobierno local
Para que el gobierno del condado yy de la Ciudad no se tenga que
preocupar Para proporcionarle a Ud. con la clase de proteIcci6n
Lie policfa y de bomberos o otros servicios crfticos cuales Ud. . ne-
cesita y merece.
Recuerde que nuestro lfmite de gastos y ese propuesto bajo la ini
ciativa del "Espiritu de 13" requiere que cualquier ingreso extra .
tendrfa que ser regresado a Ud. , o 'Ser usado Para mejoras p6blicas
cuales son de gran necesidad.
Para asegurar• servicios locales esenciales , para reducir ese ex-
ceso en Sacramento, vote para control local y para la Propo.sicibn
DON MACALLISTER
Alcalde
Ciudad de Huntington Beach
ROBERT MANDIC, JP,.
Alcalde Interino
Ciudad de Huntington Beach
` PROPOSICION "V
ANA1J S.IS I MPARCIAL
PROPOSICION CONSEJNRA DE JMPUFSTOS SO13RE VENTAS
La proposicion consejera de impuestos sobre yentas pro-
pone que el gobernador y la• legislatura adopten legislacibn •
para repartir el 6 o. de impuestos sobre ventas y usos exi.s-
tente Para que 2 centavos en lugar del 1-1/4 centavo actual-
mente alocado sea regresado a gobiernos locales .
E1 efecto de la adopcion de tal legislatura seria que
el gobierno del estado incurri.ria una reduccion substancial
de sus ingresos , y el gobierno local obtendria un aunmento
substancial en sus ingresos con la cantidad total de impues-
tos sobre ventas quedando ingual .
Actualmente la Ciudad de Huntington Beach recive 1 cen-
tavo del 1- 1/4 centavo con el Condado de Orange recibiendo el
resto.
La adopcion de la proposicion seria solo consejera y una
refleccion del electorado de esta ciudad.
GAIL HUTTON
Abogada Municipal
".� ART-CRAFT BUSINESS FORMS—(714)535-79!
REQ.No. 141259 1 4 1 2 2 1 DEPARTMENT USE
A
e H O
�J 1 � I L . , . , I Ia , 1 I 1 I U
1 6 7 Acc't No. 12 M M D D Y Y M M D D Y Y 25 78 80
13 18 19 24
Date Required
HHNTINGTON 8EACH Alicia M. Wentworth
MATERIAL Requested by qApproval
REQUISITION Approved by _ z Contacted
PURCHASING For additional information call Evelyn Phone
PURCHASING Phone 5209
DATE E/11�80 VENDOR * P.O.#
E Dora 'Clark H
N )
D 3041 E:. R6th Place P
0
R Orange CA o
F.O.B. Destination Delivery within 7Confirm Plus Frt.-Prepay&Add: Terms:
days
Spanish translation of election material re June 3, 1980
election and .Resolution No. 4850 6 hrs @ $35 per hour $ 210
TOTAL $ 210
REQ.NO. AMOIUNT REQ.NO. AMOUNT REQ.NO. AMOUNT
a 3
s
DORA CLARK
OFFICIAL COURT INTERPRETER - LEGAL AND GENERAL SECRETARY
3041 E. RUTH PL. TELEPHONE
ORANGE, CA. 92669 May 21 , 1980 714-633-1 207
S T A T E M E N T
TO : Alicia M. Wentworth , City Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
P . 0 . Box 190
Huntington Beach , California 92648
Fee for professional services as follows :
Spanish translation of election material re
June 3 , 1980 election and Resolution No . 4850
6 hours at $35 . 00 per hour $210 . 00
AMOUNT .DUE : $ 210 . 00
• yp
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
June 2, 1980
Martin & Chapman Company
2131 Bixby Road
Lakewood, CA 90712
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $4,083 for costs of
Arguments and Impartial Analysis for Proposition K and L for the
June 3rd election.
Sincerely,
'ALICIA M. WENTWORTH
CITY CLERK
Evelyn Schubert
Election Clerk
Enclosure
T. R. EGAN
4 r' ' O U N'TV O F RAN G E DIRECTOR
2� BARBARA FOX
5 �3 GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
SPECIAL SERVICES
REGISTRATION & ELECTIONS DIVISION
A. E. OLSON, REGISTRAR OF VOTERS MAI LING ADDRESS:
1300 S. GRAND AVE. P.O.BOX 11298
SANTA ANA,CA 92705 SANTA ANA,CA 92711
(714) 834-2244
May 24, 1980
Dear City Clerk:
We are enclosing a copy of the polling place list for your
city. You can pick up a set of the up-to-date indexes for
your city (no charge) in our office anytime prior to the
election if you would like to have them. Please give Carmen
a call at 834-5082 the day before you plan to come in and
tell her you would like a set of indexes for your city.
While we do not expect you to answer calls from voters about
where to vote, we do want you to have the correct information
if you do want to help.
The "purge" for the primary election will be the same type
used in 1978. Sample ballots are mailed out with "Address'
Correction Requested" printed on the envelope. If we get
a sample ballot back from the post office indicating that
the voter has moved out of county or the mail is undeliver-
able as addressed AND the person did not vote, we will
cancel the registration after the election. If we receive
a new address within the county AND the person did not vote,
we will notify the person that we are correcting his regis-
tration to the new address provided by the post office.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
Shirley Deaton
Chief, Election Operations
�41e�enme fn
` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
OVERSIZED DOCUMENT
ON FILE WITH
CITY CLERK
....1T-CRAFT BUSINESS FORMS—(714)536-7957
• REQ.NO. 141255 DEPARTMENT USE/ A O i I I I LJ 1H 1 1 1
1 6 7 Aee`t No. 12 M ,M_O D Y Y M M D D Y Y 25 78 80
T;; 13Date Required 18 t9 24
NIINTINGTON BEACH Alicia M. WB>atMJC+Tt11
MATERIAL Requested av Approval
REQUISITION Approved by Contacted
For additional nto�inatign call � Evelvn Phone
PURCHASING
5209. r.
Phone i'
DATE +�f +s41lF'r r'' �i.�, ii? +;. �_ VEIVbg* .P.O.M
V
E County of Ora „, j a ra "n vim' r�-- H
n
N 1 0
yr.,y_ d , .�: �,- 7t:-- r. ,�.T. "i ,{•
R S nta Ana ,VA' O
F.O.B. Destination Oe jy'}. ;4!,. 'w,,�, Hfm,;,1a:", c�;F' ,P1,4sI,Rit:rPnW!iY&Add:' Terms:
d*y, "`.:
BNCCTMB�$ .Fl It-')P 1104ITTOW;k AND L FOR JUNE 3RD PRIMARY ELECTION
$ 9,200
is •�' " .. . ., '. -
TOTAL$_ _. 9,200
q[Q.NO. AMOUNT REQ.NO. AMOUNT
„ .
ART-CRAFT BUSINESS FORMS-(714 6 6-1
REQ.NO. 141254 DEPARTMENT USE
I I I I U JHIAIO
1 6 177Aec't No: -12 D D Y Y M M D D Y Y 26 78 80
• Date Required 18 19 24
1
HUNTINGTON SFACH
MATERIAL Re�,ested by Approval
REQUISITION Appra'ved by contacted
PURCHASING For additional information call E„el Un I Phone
Phone 5209
DATE ,.; Y��iDO�N. P.O.N
E ' Martin;$ Cha o COupaay'. . H •
4 21 RiY :Road:. P .
71
;i,.�. 4�• ;" O .
F.O.B. Destination Delivery"lilftin:? ,t,-!, + aC4AfM{n: ,us Fit.=Frey 6 Add:; Terms:
C0$ '''Of,,W ,ARGU1 . MENTS- AND IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
FOR', PROPO.SITION X and L.'- JUNE ELECTION $ 4,083.24
.i , ..0.s..,....a... . tea. .. .U:..0 ♦..Ia-t J
.I
$ 4.083_24
Please return check to:
- —Alicia M Wpntworth
City Clerk Dept.
TOTAL$ 4,083.24
"go.NO. RtH.NO. AM0;0NT Rt®.NO. AMOUNT
.^ti. J.
PROPOSITION "L"
CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS
OF THE ELECTION UNDER ARTICLE. 34 OF
THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Before a low rent housing project can be developed,
constructed, or acquired by a state public body, such as the
Orange County Housing Authority, within a county or city,
Article 34 of the California Constitution requires approval
by a majority of the voters of that county or city. The Con-
stitution defines such housing projects, in part , as "any
development composed of. . . living accommodations for persons
of low income, financed in whole or in part by the federal
government or a state public body or to which the federal
government or a state public body extends assistance . . . . "
Proposition "L" gives the voters of those cities within
Orange County which have chosen to participate in this election
under Article 34 , an opportunity to decide whether such housing
shall be provided, with certain limitations as discussed below,
for the elderly, handicapped, and other low income persons of
the county or participating city. The decision of the voters
of a participating city shall apply only within that city.
If approved , this proposition imposes several limitations
on the production of such housing. The limitations are :
1. No city general fund money can be used.
2. Notice of a specific , proposed project must be given
to each member of the City Council and to the public .
1 .
3. Notice to the public must be placed in an established
newspaper with the greatest circulation within the area of the
proposed housing project site and must be posted in at least
three colispicuous places on the proposed site .
4. If application to a noncounty body for funding or
approval of such housing is to be made , notice to the Council
and to the public must be given before such an application for
approval or funding is made .
5. The City Council must approve the proposed application
and project .
6. Approval by the City Council can occur in one of two
ways : (a) A Council member, within thirty days' of the notice ,
can place the matter before the entire Council and, after a
public hearing, the Council can approve or conditionally ap-
prove the project , or (b) if no Council member submits the
matter to the entire Council for a public hearing within thirty
days' of the notice, the project is deemed approved.
7. The total number of units produced cannot exceed five
percent (5%) of the total number of dwelling units within the
city limit area.
The cities participating in this measure are : Anaheim,
Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach, La Habra, Los Alamitos,
San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano and Tustin.
GAII, HUTTON, City Attorney
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH , CALIFORNIA
Dated: April 23, 1980
• CI OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PARTICIPAT
IN SPECIAL ELECTION ON_JUNE 3, 1980 CALLED
BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY
TO APPROVE RENTAL .HOUSING DEVELOPMENT_ FOR ELFDE L`:'
HANDICAPPED, LOW-OR-MODERATE INCOME PERS014S
PROPOSITION "L"
ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF ARTICLE XXXIV REFERENDUM
The rising cost of housing has made it very difficult for
many families , particularly senior citizens , to afford
decent, safe housing without sacrificing other essential
items . Many are forced to spend a high percentage of their
incomes on housing which is substandard.
Approval of this measure will enable private developers to
qualify for federal and state housing funds to provide good
quality new housing at rents which these lower income persons
can afford and to make older rental units livable again.
The use of these programs requires no outlay of city or
county funds and no added cost to tR—e taxpayer. In fact,
the measure specifically rohibits use of local general
funds for this housing.
Approval of this measure does not mean the City must accept
all housing proposed. The housing must be designed to blend
with the quality and style of private housing in the neighbor-
hood and it does not have to be in apartment type projects .
Notice of any housing proposed would be given, and approval
by the City Council at a public hearing may be required, if
public sentiment demands it . The amount of housing is
limited to a small portion (50) in the
�s
The taxpayers of Orange County are already paying for state
and federal housing programs , while the money and benefits
from many of these housing programs go to other areas . Each
year the absence of Article XXXIV authority continues , the
county loses approximately two million dollars which other-
wise would be available for affordable housing. Passing this
ballot measure would enable Huntington Beach to get their fair
share of state and federal housing dollars .
. There is a pressing need for the housing this measure will
provide. We strongly recommend approval of this proposition,
RUTH BAILEY
MAYOR
Dated: April 22, 1980 RUTH E. FINLEY
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
t }
PROPOSICION "L"
ANALISIS IMPARCIAL DE LA ABOGADA MUNICIPAL
DE LA ELECCION BAJO EL ARTICULO 34
DE LA CONSTITUCION DE CALIFORNIA
Antes que un proyecto de viviendas de rentas bajas pueda
ser desarrollado , construido , o adquirido por un cuerpo publico
del estado , tal como la Autoridad de Viviendas del Condado de
Orange , dentro de un condado o una ciudad, el Articulo 34 de
la Constitucion requiere aprovacion por la mayoria de los vo-
tantes de ese condado o esa ciudad. La constitucion defina
tales proyectos de viviendas , en parte , como "cualquier urba-
nizacion compuesta de . . . acomodaciones de viviendas para
personas de ingresos bajos , financiado completamente o en par-
te por el gobierno federal o un cuerpo publico del estado o
uno a cual el gobierno federal o el cuerpo publico del estado
le extiende asistencia . "
La Proposicion "L" le da a los votantes de esas ciudades
dentro del Condado de Orange cuales han escogido participar en
esta eleccion bajo el Articulo 34 , una oportunidad de decir si
tales viviendas seran proporcionadas , con ciertas limitaciones
discuitdas ma's abajo , Para los mayores de edad, empedidos , y
otras personas con ingresos bajos del condado o ciudad parti-
cipante . La decision de los votantes de una ciudad partici-
pante aplicara solo dentro de esa ciudad.
Si es aprovada, esta proposicion impone varias limitacio-
nes sobre la produccion de tales viviendas . Las limitaciones
son:
1 . Ningun dinero del fondo general de la ciudad
puede ser usado .
2 . Aviso de un proyecto especifico propuesto se
le tiene que dar a cada miembro del Concilio
Municipal y al publico .
3. E1 aviso al publico se tiene que poner en un
periodico establecido con la circulacion ma's
grande dentro de la area del sitio del pro-
yecto de viviendas propuesto.
t
4 . Si una aplicaci6n es hecha con un cuerpo cual
no es del condado Para fondos o aprovacio'n
de tales viviendas , un aviso al Concilio Mu-
nicipal y al publico tiene que ser dado antes
que tal aplicaci6n para aprovacion o fondos
sea hecha.
5 . El Concilio Municipal tiene que aprovar la
aplicaci6n y el proyecto propuesto .
6 . La aprovacion del Concilio Municipal puede
ocurrir en una o dos maneras : (a) Un miem-
bro del Concilio , dentro de treinta dias del
aviso , puede poner el asunto frente todo el
Concilio y, despues de una audiencia publica,
el Concilio puede aprovar o condicionalmente
aprovar el proyecto ; o (b) Si ningun miembro
del Concilio somete el asunto frente todo el
Concilio para audiencia publica dentro de
treinta dias despues del aviso , el proyecto
se considera estar aprovado .
7. El numero total de unidades producidas no
puede exceder el cinco porciento (50) del
numero total de unidades de viviendas dentro
de la area del limite de la ciudad.
Las ciudades participando en esta medida son: Anaheim,
Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach, La Habra, Los Ala-
mitos , San Clemente , San Juan Capistrano y Tustin.
GAIL HUTTON
Abogada Municipal
� 1
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
April 18, 1980
Mrs. Dora Clark
3041 E. Ruth Place
Orange, CA 92669
Dear Dora,
Enclosed is the City Attorney's Impartial Analysis of the Election
Under Article 34 of The California Constitution - Proposition "L",
which we would appreciate you translating.
The arguments for Proposition "L" will be forwarded to you as soon
as we receive them. Hopefully we will be able to send them to you
on Monday, April 21 , 1980.
We are sorry to be so late in providing you with this material .
Please call 536-5227 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, CITY CLERK
By:
Connie Broc way, Deputy
AMW:cb
enc.
City of Huntington Beach
c,^^YYy P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 62648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
April 21 , 1980
Mrs. Dora Clark
3041 E. Ruth Place
Orange, CA 92669
Dear Dora,
Enclosed is the arguement relative to Propos tti.on "L" on the
June 3rd Primary ballot which we would appreciate you translating.
Again, we are sorry to be so late in providing you with this
material . Please call 536-5227 if you have any questions.
ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, CITY CLERK
By:
Deputy
AMW:cb
enc.
COUNTY MEASURE C
PROPOSED ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF ARTICLE XXXIV REFERENDUM
March 28 , 1980
The rising cost of housing has made it very difficult for many
families, particularly senior citizens, to afford decent, safe
housing without sacrificing other essential items. Many are
forced to spend a high percentage of their incomes on housing
which is substandard.
Approval of this measure will enable private developers to
qualify for federal and state housing funds to provide good
quality new housing at rents which these lower income persons
can afford and to make older rental units livable again.
The use of these programs requires no outlay of city or county
funds and no added cost to the taxpayer. In fact, the measure
specifically prohibits use of local general funds for this
housing.
Approval of this measure does not mean the county must accept
all housing proposed. The housing must be designed to blend
with the quality and style of private housing in the neighbor-
hood and it does not have to be in apartment type projects.
Notice of any housing proposed would be given, and approval by
the Board of Supervisors at a public hearing may be required,
if public sentiment demands it. The amount of housing is limited
to a small portion (50) in the unincorporated county.
The taxpayers of Orange County are already paying for state and
federal housing programs , while the money and benefits from many
of these housing programs go to other areas. Each year the
absence of Article XXXIV authority continues , the county loses
approximately two million dollars which otherwise would be avail-
able for affordable housing. Passing of this ballot measure
would enable Orange County to get their fair share of state and
federal housing dollars.
There is a pressing need for the housing this measure will provide.
We strongly recommend approval of this proposition.
Lorella Koran, President, League of Women Voters of Orange County
Brenda Premo, Executive Director, Dayle McIntosh Center for the Disabled
Mary Lou Wheeler, Chairperson, Board of Commissioners , Orange County Housing Authority
Mary L. Yunt, Secretary-treasurer, Orange County Central Labor Council , AFL CIO
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION RCA #8 0-3 7
Submitted by Floyd G. Belsito Department Administration
Date Prepared April 18 , 19 8 0 Backup Material Attached Q Yes No
Subject Article 34 Referendum Ballot Measure Arguments
City Administrator's Comments
J�y11�
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions:
Statement of Issue
Arguments are needed for the low cost housing measure which will be on the
June ballot.
Recommendation
Direct that an argument in favor of the Article XXXIV Referendum be
prepared and authorize the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem to sign it .
Analysis
Council previously approved a resolution putting a measure regarding funds
for low cost housing on the June ballot . At that time it was thought that
no arguments needed to be prepared since the County would be publishing
arguments for the same measure .
We have now been advised that we should have an argument printed, and . it
must be to the printer by April 24 , 1980. Attached is the argument which
will be used by the County. The City could use the same argument .
Funding Source
Housing and Community Development Block Grant.
Alternative
Do not publish an argument.
Plo 3/78 /`
COUNTY MEASURE C
PROPOSED ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF ARTICLE XXXIV REFERENDUM
March 28 , 1980
The rising cost of housing has made it very difficult for many
families, particularly senior citizens, to afford decent, safe
housing without sacrificing other essential items . Many are
forced to spend a high percentage of their incomes on housing
which is substandard.
Approval of this measure will enable private developers to
qualify for federal and state housing funds to provide good
quality new housing at rents which these lower income persons
can afford and to make older rental units livable again.
The- use of these programs requires no outlay of city or county
funds and no added cost to the taxpayer. In fact, the measure
specifically prohibits use of local general funds for this
housing.
Approval of this measure does not mean the county must accept
all housing proposed. The housing must be designed to blend
with the quality and style of private housing in the neighbor-
hood and it does not have to be in apartment type projects.
Notice of any housing proposed would be given, and approval by
the Board of Supervisors at a public hearing may be required,
if public sentiment demands it. The amount of housing is limited
to a small portion (5%) in the G!/� .
The taxpayers of Orange County are already paying for state and
federal housing programs, while the money and benefits from many
of these housing programs go to other areas. Each year the
absence of Article XXXIV authority continues , the county loses
approximately two million dollars which otherwise would be avail-
able for affordable housing. Passing of this ballot measure
would enable Orange County to get their fair share of state and
federal housing dollars.
There is a pressing need for the housing this measure will provide.
We strongly recommend approval of this proposition.
Lorella Koran, President , League of Women Voters of Orange County
Brenda Premo, Executive Director, Dayle McIntosh Center for the Disabled
Mary Lou Wheeler, Chairperson, Board of Commissioners, Orange County Housing Authority
Mary L. Yunt, Secretary-treasurer, Orange County Central Labor Council , AFL CIO
in
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
t, I� INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTtNGTON BEACH • ��
To Bud Belsito, Administrator From Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk
Subject COUNTY CONSOLIDATION - Date April 17, 1980
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
The initial cost is 10� per registered voter - currently 91 ,296 are registered.
The County will purge following the Primary and General and that total will be
reduced depending on the extent of the purge.
The charge includes postage, printing, polling places and board members.
This service could cost between $8,000 and $10,000 and would save approximately
$5,000 and $7,000 in supplies and printing charges to an election supplier.
The pamphlet size would be reduced to 512 x 8-%2- to conform with the county mailing.
Nomination Papers and Statements of Qualifications may be processed by the County,
but additional costs would be imposed for checking signatures. However, the City
Clerk would still be responsible for Spanish translation of the Statements and
printing of the voter's pamphlet for the county. Printing is approximately $3,000,
with part refundable by the candidates paying for their portion, including printing,
translation and mailing. This deposit would be reduced as the mailing would be done
by the county.
Substantial savings would be effected by not using the City computer and all other
personnel required for the conduct of an election..
I would suggest that, if the electorate decides on this change as a cost saving and
larger voter turnout alternative, that the City Clerk retain the responsibility of
nomination papers, campaign statements, and any duties over the 10¢ per registered
voter charged by the county.
To date, the City of Irvine and most recently, the City of Newport Beach have chosen
to consolidate with the County of Orange for the June Primary.
The cost savings will be the major advantage. The disadvantage will be the slowness
of the County counting procedure, as the order of results is Federal , State, County,
Cities & Propositions. The County is still working on obtaining a new computer and
this would no doubt expedite the procedure.
The exact amount of cost saving is not available at this time, but I will furnish you
with the exact cost of the election when all • the bills are in.
AMW:bt
A
REGISTR
4 004 '�Q
COUNTY COUNSEL' S IMPARTIAL ,ANALYSIS
OF THE ELECTION UNDER ARTICLE 34 OF
THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Before a low rent housing project can be developed, construc
ted, or acquired by a State public body, such as the Orange County
Housing Authority, within a county or city, Article 34 of the
California Constitution requires approval by a majority of the
voters of that county or city. The Constitution defines such
housing projects , in part, as "any development composed of . .
living accommodations for persons of low income, financed in
whole or in part by the federal government or a state public body
or to which the federal government or a state public body extends
assistance "
` F'I-v o3ir�o�
C gives the voters of the unincorporated area of
Orange County and of those cities within Orange County which have
chosen td.. participate in this election under Article '34 an
opportunity to decide whether such housing shall be provided, with
certain limitations as discussed below, for the elderly, handi-
capped, and other low income persons of the county or participating
city: The decision of the voters of the unincorporated area shall ,
apply only 'within •the unincorporated county area and the decision
of the voters of a participating city shall apply only within that
city.
If approved, this proposition imposes several limitations
on the production of such housing. . The limitations are the same
for the unincorporated county as for participating cities .
Y ,
However, they shall be described as they apply .to the unincorporated
county. References to the incorporated county and Board of Super-
visors apply equally to participating cities and to the .city
councils of those cities. The limitations are:
1. No county general fund money can be used-.
2 . Notice of a specific, proposed project must be given
to each member of the County Board of Supervisors and to the public.
3.. Notice to the public must be placed in an established
newspaper with the greatest circulation within the area of the
proposed housing project site and must be posted in at least three
conspicuous places on the proposed site.
4. If application to. a non-county body for funding or
approval of. such housing is to be .made, notice to the Board members
.and to the public must be given before such an application for
approval or funding. is :made.
5,. The County Board of Supervisors must approve the
proposed application and project.
6. Approval by the Board of Supervisors. can occur in
one of two ways : (a) A Board member, within thirty days ' of the
notice, can place the matter before the entire Board and, after a
public hearing, the Board can approve or conditionally approve the,
project, or (b) If no Board member submits the matter to the
entire Board for a public hearing within thirty days ' of the notice,
the project is deemed approved.
7. The total number of. units produced cannot exceed five
percent of 'the total number of dwelling units within the unincor-
porated county area.
j
The cities participating in this measure are:. Anaheim, .
Buena Park, Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach, La Habra, Los Alamitos,
San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano, and Tustin.
t
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
April 15, 1980
Martin & Chapman Company
2131 Bixby Road
Lakewood, California 90712
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find Proposition K - Impartial Analysis - Sales Tax
Advisory Proposition which will appear on the June ballot.
Sincerely,
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
AMW:cs
I
a
i
IflCITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPA�TMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To City Clerk From City Attorney
Subject Impartial Analysis - Sales Date April 15, 1980
Tax Advisory Proposition ;
The sales . tax advisory proposition proposes that the governor and
legislature adopt legislation to apportion the existing 6% sales and
use tax so that 2 cents rather than 1-1/4 cents presently allocated,
be returned to local governments.
The effect of the adoption of �uch legislation would be for the state
government to incur a substantial reduction of its revenues and the
local governments to reap a substantial increase in their revenues
with the total amount of the sales tax remaining the same.
Currently the City of Huntington Beach receives 1 cent of the 1-1/4
cents with the County of Orange receiving the remainder.
Adoption of the proposition would be advisory only and a reflection
of the will of the electorate- of this city.
GAIL HUTTON
City Attorney
GH:*:bc
Research done by Ronald F. Faalevao, Law Clerk
i
`R •
City of Huntington Beach
' P.O. BOX 160 CALIFORNIA 62648
OFFICE OF T/CLE
March 18, 1980
Mr. Al E. Olson
Registrar of Voters
P. 0. Box 11298
Santa Ana, CA 92711
Attn: Shirley Deaton
Dear Mr. Olson:
Enclosed is, a certified copy of Resolution No. 4859 adopted by the City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach on March 17, 1980 requesting
participation in a Special Election called by the Board of Supervisors
of Orange County to approve rental housing development for elderly,
handicapped, low or moderate-income persons.
The City of Huntington Beach requests that the votes cast within this
city at said election be tabulated separately from the unincorporated
area and any other participating city.
Sincerely,
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
AMW:cd
cc: Board of Supervisors
P. 0. Box 687
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Enclosure
RESOLUTION NO . 4859
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUESTING PARTICIPATION IN A
SPECIAL ELECTION CALLED BY THE BOARD OF SUPER-
VISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY TO APPROVE RENTAL HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT FOR ELDERLY , HANDICAPPED, LOW- OR
MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange
adopted Resolution No . 80-311 on February 27, 1980 calling a
special election for the approval of rental housing developments
for low- and moderate-income, handicapped, and elderly persons;
and
The Federal Community Development Block Grant regulations
require the adoption and implementation of a Housing Assistance
Plan which identifies the housing needs of the low- and moderate-
income, handicapped and elderly households and which identifies
the steps to be taken to respond to those needs; and
The primary sources of funding identified in the adopted
Housing Assistance Plan are available through the California
Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) and the Federal Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) ; and
The use of CHFA funding and assistance for new construction
and substantial rehabilitation to meet the housing needs identi-
fied require that the majority of the qualified electors of the
county and its cooperating cities vote on and approve the de-
velopment, construction, and/or financing of rental housing
developments for low- and moderate-income, handicapped, and
elderly persons , pursuant to the provisions of Article XXXIV of
the California Constitution; and
The City of Huntington Beach may choose to participate in
the special election, called for this purpose by the Board of
/ahb
2/29/80 1.
Supervisors of Orange County by adopting this resolution; and
The entire costs of the election, including the cities
r
choosing to participate in the special election, will be paid
from the Community Development Block Grant,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Huntington Beach does hereby request to participate in
the special election called by the .Board of Supervisors of Orange
County to approve rental housing developments for elderly, handi-
capped, low- or moderate-income persons .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a certified copy of this resolu-
tion be transmitted to the Registrar of Voters of the County of
Orange on or before March 21 , 1980, and that the Registrar of
Voters. be notified of the request of the City of Huntington Beach
that the votes cast within this city be tabulated separately from
the unincorporated area and any other participating city.
PASSED' AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th
day of March, 1980 .
Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: rITIATED AND APPROVED:
City Admi trator /Tfrofc�tororDevelopment
Services
2.
Kee No. 4859
S'rxrE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
. I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day
of March , 19 80 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:
Pattinson, Thomas, Mandic, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
NOES: Councilmen:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
MacAllister
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
t
J� I' City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 82648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
March 8, 1980
Ms. Dora Clark
3041 East Ruth Place
Orange, California 92669
Dear Dora:
Enclosed please find the "Argument In Favor of Advisory Sales Tax
Proposition" for translation.
Please bill us separately for this translation and also for the
translation you did of the Resolution regarding the sales tax
proposition. Both of these items pertain to a proposition that
will appear on the June ballot and we wish to keep the June election
expenditures separate from the April election expenditures.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
ALICIA M. WENTWORTH
CITY CLERK
Evelyn Schubert
Election Clerk
AMa:ES:js
Enclosure
v
ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF ADVISORY SALES TAX PROPOSITION
Want to send a message to Sacramento? Then vote YES on Proposition !
Ask yourself, what public services are of the greatest importance to you?
Police protection?
Fire protection?
Libraries?
Parks and Recreation?
All these services are provided by local government and essential to a
good quality of life.
Certainly they are of far greater value than those championed by overstaffed
state and federal bureaucracies, which produce questionable benefits to the
public while unquestionably devouring your tax dollars.
Did you know that the state collects locally a 6% sales tax, yet returns only
slightly more than 17.? The rest stays in Sacramento where a budget surplus
has proven to be an irresistible temptation for Sacramento politicians to
underwrite their pet projects.
Yet, local government is faced with having to reduce or hold the line on
these most important public services.
It simply does not make sense!
Proposition tells Sacramento it had better get the priorities straight,
and address our most critical needs without increasing the tax burden.
Proposition proposes that some of that money that now goes to and is
spent in Sacramento be returned to local government so that city and county
government does not have to be concerned with providing you with the kind of
police and fire protection or other critical services you need and deserve.
Remember that our spending limit and that proposed under the "Spirit of 13"
initiative requires that any extra revenue would have to be returned to
you, or be used for much needed public improvements.
To assure essential local services, to reduce that surplus in Sacramento,
vote for local control and for Proposition
DON MACALLISTER
MAYOR
City of Huntington Beach
ROBERT MANDIC, JR.
Mayor Pro Tem
City of Huntington Beach
ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF ADVISORY SALES TAX PROPOSITION
Want to send a message to Sacramento? Then vote YES on Proposition '
Ask yourself , what public services are of the greatest importance to you?
Police protection?
Fire protection?
Libraries ?
Parks and Recreation?
All these services are provided by local government and essential to a
good quality of life.
Certainly they are of far greater value than those championed by over-
staffed state and federal bureaucracies , which produce questionable
benefits to the public while unquestionably devouring your tax dollars . + '
Did you know that the state collects locally a 6% sales tax , yet
returns only slightly more than 1 %? The rest stays in Sacramento
where a budget surplus has proven to be an irresistible
temptation for Sacramento politicians to underwrite their pet projects .
Yet , local government is faced with having to reduce or hold the line
on these most important public services .
It simply does not make sense !
Proposition tells Sacramento it had better get the priorities
straight , and address our most critical needs without increasing the
tax burden .
Proposition proposes that some of that money that now goes to and
is spent in Sacramento be returned to local government so that city and
county government does not have to be concerned with providing you with
the kind of police and fire protection or other critical services you
need and deserve .
Remember that our spending limit and that proposed under the ' Spirit
of 13 ' initiative requires that any extra revenue would have to be
returned to you , or be used for much needed public improvements .
To assure essential local services , to reduce that surplus in
Sacramento , vote for local control and for Proposition
DON MACALLISTER
Mayor
' City of Huntington Beach
ROBERT MANDIC , JR.
Mayor Pro Tem
City of Huntington Beach
t
ARGUMENTO A FAVOR DE LA PROPOSICION
CONSEJERA DE IMPUESTOS SOBRE VENTAS
j.Qu i.e rc mandar un mensage a Sacramento? i Entonces vote SI sobre
1a I'r-ohosici6n ! PregGntese , Lcuales servicios pfiblicos son
do ma's importancia para Ud. ?
1,1'rotccci6n de Poli.cia?
i,Py-otccci.6n de Bomberos?
LBibIiotecas?
LParques y Recreo?
Todos estos servicios son proporcionados por el gobierno local y
esenciales Para una buena calidad de vida.
Seguramente son de mucho mas valor que esos. apoyados por las buro-
cracias del estado y federal con demasiado personal , cuales produ-
cers beneficios dudosos al p6blico, mientras que sin duda devoran
sus d6lares de impuestos .
LSabfa Ud. que el estado recauda localmente un impuesto sobre ven-
tas del 6% , y sin embargo solo regresa un poco ma's del 1%? El resto
queda en Sacramento donde el bulto del presupuesto a provado ser
una tentaci6n irresistible para los politicos de Sacramento para
subscriber sus proyectos favoritos .
Sin embargo , el gobierno local se enfrenta con tener que reducir
o mantener la linea de estos servicios pGblicos tan importantes .
iEsto simpleme'nte no tiene buen juicio!
La Proposicion le dice a Sacramento que serfa bueno que ponga
sus prioridades en linea, y se dirija hacia nuestras necesidades
mas crfticas sin aunmentar el peso de los impuestos.
La Proposici6n propone que un poco ,de, ese dinero cual ahora
va a Sacramento y es gastado allf sea re'jresado al gobierno local
para que el gobierno del condado de la cgudad no se tenga que
preocupar para proporcionarle a 6d'.' con la clase de protecci6n
de policfa y de bomberos o otros servicios crfticos cuales Ud. ne-
cesita y merece .
Recuerde que nuestro limite de gastos y ese propuesto bajo la ini-
ciativa del "Espiritu de 13" requiere que cualquier ingreso extra
tendrfa que ser regresado a Ud. , o ser usado para mejoras pGblicas
cuales son de gran necesidad.
t'
i',ira asegurar servici.os locales - esenciales , para reducir ese ex-
ceso on Sacramento , vote para control local y para la Proposicion
DON MACALLISTER
Alcalde
Ciudad de Huntington Beach
ROBERT MANDIC , JR.
Alcalde Interino
Ciudad de Huntington Beach
r
'City of Huntington Beach
+ P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92640
`i
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
March 7, 1980
Registrar of Voters
1300 South Grand
Santa Ana, California 92711
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find for your information, a notice regarding a
City measure appearing on the June ballot.
Sincerely,
ALICIA M. WENTWORTH
CITY CLERK
Evelyn Schubert
Election Clerk
AMW:ES:js
Enclosure
J� I& City of Huntington Beach
•
P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 62648
n,.i.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
March 7, 1980
Martin & Chapman Company
2131 Bixby Road
Lakewood, California 90712
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find, for your information, a notice regarding a
City Measure appearing on the June ballot.
Sincerely,
ALICIA M. WENTWORTH
CITY CLERK
Evelyn Schubert
Election Clerk
AMW:ES:js
Enclosure
j + publish: March 9, 1980
Two Affidavit's required
NOTICE TO ELECTORS OF DATE AFTER WHICH NO ARGUMENTS
FOR OR AGAINST A CITY MEASURE MAY BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY CLERK
(NOTICIA A ELECTORES ACERCA DE LA FECHA DESPUES DE LA QUE
NINGUNOS ARGUMENTOS PRO 0 CONTRA UN PROYECTO MUNICIPAL
PUEDEN SER SOMETIDOS AL SECRETARIO MUNICIPAL)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the General Municipal Election is to be held in the
City of Huntington Beach on June 3, 1980, at which there will be submitted to the
qualified electors of said City the following measure:
Advisory Vote Only
'ADVISORY PROPOSITION:
' That the Govenor and '
'Legislature apportion the ' YES
'existing six cent sales and '
'use tax so that two cents '
'rather than the one cent
'presently allocated, may
'be used by local agencies '
'for priority local services
'rather than state distribu- ° NO '
'tion or state reserves.
1
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 5 of the
Elections Code of the State of Californa, the legislative body of said City, or any
member or members thereof authorized by such body, or any individual voter or bona fide
association of citizens, or any combination of such voters and associations, may file a
written argument, not to exceed 300 words in length, for or against said City measure.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, based upon the time reasonably necessary to prepare
and print the arguments and sample ballots for said election, the City Clerk has fixed
March 28, 1980, as a reasonable date prior to such election after which no arguments for
or against said City measure may be submitted to her for printing and distribution to the
voters as provided in said Article 4. Arguments shall be submitted to the City Clerk at
the City Hall , P. 0. Box 190, Huntington Beach, California. Arguments may be changed or
withdrawn until and including said date fixed by the City Clerk.
(NOTICIA SE DA ESTE MEDIO que tendrS lugar la General ElecciSn Municipal en la
Ciudad de Huntington Beach el dia 3 de Junio, 1980, en la que serg sometido a los
electores calificados de susodicha Ciudad el siguiente proyecto Municipal):
Voto Solo Consejero
'PROPOSICION CONSEJERA: '
'Que el Gobernador y la '
'Legislatura repartan el '
'impuesto existente sobre SI '
'ventas y usos para que '
'dos centavos en lugar
'de un centavo actuaimente '
Ialocado, pueda ser usado '
'por agencias locales para
'servicios locales de prio-
'ridad en lugar de distribu- ' NO
'cion por el estado o para
'la reserva del estado.
< <
(NOTICIA ADEMAS SE DA que de acuerdo con el Articulo 4, CapTtulo 3, Divisi6n 5
del Codigo de Elecciones del Estado de California, el cuerpo legislativo de dicha Ciudad,
o cualquier socio de socios de eso autori:zados, por dicho cuerpo, o cualquier votante
individual o bona fide asociaci6n de ciudadanos, o cualquier combinaci6n de tales votantes
y asociaciones, puede registrar un argumento escrito, que no excedera 300 palabras de
largura, pro o contra dicho proyecto Municipal . )
(NOTICIA ADEMAS SE DA que, basada sobre el tiempo razonablemente necesario para
preparar e imprimir los argumentos y las balotas muestra para dicha elecci6n, el
Secretario Municipal ha fijado el dia 28 de Marzo, 1980, como una fecha razonable anterior
a dicha elecci6n despues de la que ningunos argumentos pro o contra dicho proyecto
Municipal pueden ser sometidos a ella para impresi6n y distribuci6na los votantes como pro-
visto en dicho Articulo 4. Argumentos deben ser sometidos al Secretario Municipal en el
Ayuntamiento, Caja Postal 190, Huntington Beach, California. Los Argumentos pueden ser
cambiados o retirados hasta y incluyendo dicha fecha fijada por el Secretario Municipal . )
ABOVE NOTICE GIVEN by me this 6 day of March 1980
(LA YA MENCIONADA NOTICIA DADA por mT este 6 dia de Marzo 19 80 . )
r
City Clerk of the City o untington Beach, California
(Secretario Municipal de la Ciudad de Huntington Beach, California)
Dated: March 6, 1980
(Fecha: de 6 de Marzo, 1980)
0/'f
REQUEST FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION,
Submitted by Alicia M. Wentworth Department City Clerk
Date Prepared March 6 , 19 80 Backup Material Attached Yes No
Subject Sales Tax Advisory Proposition - 6/3/80
Executive Director's Comments
' APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
Approve as recommended �/Ja-ei
— 'Cl Y CLER
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Souce, Alternative Actions:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
The City Attorney may be directed by the City Council to submit an impartial
analysis to be published in the voter pamphlet preceding the proposition.
(S.5011 , Elections Code) .
RECOMMENDATION
Direct the City Attorney to prepare impartial analysis by 7Apri;1 21 , 1980.
ANALYSIS
The purpose of the impartial analysis is to show the effect of the measure on
the existing law and and the operation of the measure.
ALTERNATIVE
Determine that no impartial analysis be prepared.
FUNDING SOURCE
Elections Account
PIO 4/78
I .
I'
i;
'I
I I
Advisory Vote Only
' ADVISORY PROPOSITION:
' That the Oovernor and
'Legislature apportion the ' YES '
'existing six cent sales and
'use tax so that two cents
' rather than the one cent
'presently allocated, may -be-
'be used by local agencies
' for priority local services ' NO '
' rather than state distribu-
tion or state reserves .
. i
i
i
i
t'4 I
1 '
i
I r° .
ELECTION PROCEDURES REGARDING LOCAL ADVISORY
BALLOT PROPOSITION
the Elections Code (Section 5353) provides a mechanism for the public to voice their
opinion on substantive issues or to indicate to the local legislative body approval
or disapproval of the ballot proposal. The "advisory vote" means an indication of
general voter opinion and the results in no way are controlling on the legislative
body
Procedures for placing an advisory measure on the ballot are briefly summarized below.
Suggested Actual Elect. Code
Date Date Citation
3/10/80 2/19/80 S4017, 4018 Council to place measure on ballot
5010-16 &
22807
3/10/80 2/28/80 Determine & announce deadline for submission
of arguments - Publish
3/28/80 DEADLINE
4/21/80 S5011 City Attorney to prepare synopses and may be
requested to prepare impartial analysis
4/24/80 S 22833-22835 Public notice of measure and argument
*While not apparently required by law, ordering submission of the advisory measure
to the electors of the city at the Special Municipal Election should probably be
published to be cautious and avoid any allegations of lack of notice.
*Since there apprears to be no deadline for submission of advisory ballot measures,
the controlling factor is the time required locally to prepare the necessary sample
ballot materials.
*City Clerks usually prefer to publish any notice of deadlines for submittal of
ballot arguments at the same time as the Notice of Election (by 3/10/80) in order to
give notice of measures that will be on the ballot
*Regarding an impartial analysis of the measure, under Elections Code Section 5011
the governing body may request the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis
of the measure.
` �--- --- — - —_---- - -- ELECTIONS CODE
Article 4.Arguments Concerning City Measures ELECTIONS CODE 5015.,
5810. "City measure"definition. 5014. Argument not accepted without names.
As used in this article,"city measure"includes an A ballot argument shall not be accepted under this article unless accompanied
ro y Proposed city charter,an panted
proposed amendment to a city charter,an p� Y by the name or names of the person or persons submitting it,or,if submitted on
by the city,any advisory Y Proposition for the issuance of bonds behalf of an organization,the name of the organization and the name of at least
ry question,or any other question or proposition submitted to the voters of a city. one of its principal officers.
(Amended by Stats 1976, c. 916, §2.) No more than five signatures shall appear with any argument submitted under
this article. In case any argument is signed by more than five persons the
0-5011. City attorney to prepare impartial anal sis, signatures of the first five shall be printed.
Whenever any city measure qualifies for a place on the ballot,the governing (Added by Stats 1976, c. 248, §3.)
body may direct the city clerk to transmit a copy of the measure to the city 5014.1. Argument not accepted without consent from person included in
attorney,unless the organization or salaries of the office of the city attorney are text.
affected. The city attorney shall prepare an impartial analysis of the measure
showing the effect of the measure on the existing law and the operation of the A ballot argument or,if applicable,a rebuttal argument which includes In its
measure. If the measure affects the organization or salaries of the office of the text the name of a person, other than the author of the argument, who is
city attorney, the governing board may direct the city clerk to prepare the i represented as being for or against a measure,shall not be accepted unless the
impartial analysis.The analysis shall be printed preceding the arguments for and argument is accompanied by a signed consent of such person. The consent of a
against the measure. The analysts shall not exceed 500 words!n length. person, other than an individual, shall be signed by an officer or other duly
(Added by Stats. 1976, c. 248, §3.) authorized representative."Person"as used in this section means any individual,
501i It not otherwise could i partnership, corporation, association, committee, labor organization, and any'
Provided voters may submit arguments. other organization or group of persons.
If there is no other method provided by general law, or, in the case of a (Added by Stats. 1978, c. 172, §3)
chartered city,by the charter or by city ordinance,arguments for and against any t
city measure may be submitted to the qualified voters of the city pursuant to this 5014.5. Rebuttal arguments.
article. If a method is otherwise provided by general law, or, in the case of a ' (a)If any Person submits an argument against a city measure,and an argument
chartered city, by charter or city ordinance, for submitting arguments as to a has been filed in favor of the city measure, the clerk shall immediately send
Particular kind of city measure,that method shall control. copies of that argument to the persons filing the argument in favor of the city
(Added byStat� 1976, c. 248, §3) measure. The persons filing the argument in favor of the city measure may
5011 Written arguments, prepare and submit a rebuttal argument not exceeding 250 words.The clerk shall
he legislative body, or any member or members of the legislative body send copies of the argument in favor of the measure to the persons filing the
authorized by that body,or any Individual voter or bona fide assocation of citizens, argument against the city measure,who may prepare and submit a rebuttal to the
or any combination of voters and associations,may file a written argument in favor of the city measure not exceeding 250 words. The rebuttal
any city measure.No argument for or arguments shall be filed with the clerk not more than 10 days after the final date
clerk shall cause an argument forshall argument against words to length.The city for filing direct arguments. Rebuttal arguments shall be printed In the same
Printed along with the following statement onth frontver or 11 none, n fhe manner as the direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall immediately
heading of the firstfollow the direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
"Arguments ine' of the printed arguments. (b)The provisions of subdivision(a)shall only apply if,not later than the day
the authors." pport or opposition of the proposed laws are the opinions of on which the legislative body calls an election,the legislative body,by a majority
vote,adopts Its provisions; in which case, the provisions of subdivision (a) shall
The city clerk shall enclose a printed copy of both arguments with each sample
hallo[: provide,that only those aPP1Y at the next ensuing municipal election and at each municipal election
Printed and enclosed with the e b is fi he pursuant to this section shall be thereafter, unless later repealed by the legislative body in accord with the
matter' Rithin the meaning of those words used in Section penis�11official � Procedures of this subdivision.
Printed arguments submitted to voters in accordance with this section shall be (Added by Stag 1977, c. 701, §2.)
titled lane,"Argument In Favor Of Measure l 5415. City clerk to set date for receiving !3/�d
Measure,_, --_"or"Argument Against j g arguments. 3
letter ' numb fie anycwh ch desiggnattess the measureces . At ng filled
the discre on of the Based
ple ballots for at reasonablynecessary
essary to prepare and print the arguments
clerk.the word"Proposition"may be substituted for the word"Measure"in such ! and sample particular election, the city clerk shall fix and
titles '`°rd` used in the title shall not be counted when determining the length or against any cdetermine a ity measure nable tmay be e prior to
for pr the election ointing and distribution to the
of a.n.. rzumUse
:.once r.
bY Stats ,u__ c 29_ ;5 t voters as provided in this article. Arguments may be changed or withdrawn by
their proponents until and including the date fixed by the city clerk.
(Added by Stats. 1976, c. 248, §3.)
ELECTIONS r_ODE
5916. Clerk to select if more than one argument.
If more than one argument for or more than one argument against any city
measure is submitted to the city clerk within the time prescribed, the city clerk
shall select one of the arguments in favor and one of the arguments against the
measure for printing and distribution to the voters. In selecting the argument the
City clerk shall give preference and priority In the order named to the arguments
of the following-
(a) The legislative body, or member or members of the legislative body
authorized by that body.
(b)The individual voter or bona fide association of citizens,or combination of
voters end associations, who are the bona fide sponsors or proponents of the
(c) Bona fide associations of citizens.
(d) Individual voters.
(Added by Stet& 1978, C.248, §3.)
Article 5.Mailings
5026• One copy of official material per household.
Whenever the clerk is required to mail official matter,as provided in Sections
4015,4015.5,4018,5011,5012,5013,and 5014.5,only one copy of each such official
matter shall be mailed to a postal address where two or more registered have the same surname and the same postal address. voters
The provisions of this section shall only apply if the legislative body of the city
adopts the provisions of this section and the election official conducting the
election approves of the procedure.
(Added by Stat& 1978, c. 1279, §2.)
Chapter 4.District Elections
Article I.Initiative
515C Scope of article.
In addition to any other method provided by law,ordinances may be enac
by any district pursuant to this article, except that the led
provisions of this article
shall not apply to irrigation districts,to a district formed under a law which"does
not provide a procedure for elections,to a district formed under a law which does
not provide for action by ordinance, to a disMet governed by an election
Procedure which permits voters,in electing the district's directors or trustees,to
cast more than one vote per voter, or to a district in which the directors are
empowered to cast more than one vote per director when acting on any matter.
(Added by Stela 1978, c. 248, §3.)
5151. "District"definition.
For the purposes of initiative and referendum under this chapter,includes any regional agency which has the power to tax,to regulate la"district"
nd use,or i
to condemn and purchase land.
(Added by Stats. 1976, c. 248, §3.)
i
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Submitted by James W. Palin Department Development Services
Date Prepared March 6 , 19 80 Backup Material Attached ® Yes No
Subject ARTICLE XXXIV REFERENDUM MEASURE FOR JUNE 3, 1980 Ballot
City Administrator's Comments
- -
APPROVED BY CItTY ��
Approve as recommended . ?_i7 _ `�
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: �(,
t
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
On February 27, 1980, the Orange County Board of Supervisors adopted
a resolution calling a special consolidated election for June 3,
1980 for the purpose of presenting to the voters within unincorporated
areas an Article XXXIV Referendum. The resolution also provided that
cities within the County may have the referendum placed on local
ballots by the passage of a like resolution. On March 3, 1980, the
Council requested that such a resolution be prepared for the City
of Huntington Beach.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached Resolution, as prepared by the City Attorney,
calling a special election for June 3, 1980 for the purpose of pre-
senting to the voters of Huntington Beach the question of whether
low rent housing projects shall be authorized within the City.
ANALYSIS•
Article XXXIV of the California Constitution requires that before
a "State public body" (including cities) participates in the develop-
ment, construction, or acquisition of a "low rent housing project"
there must be approval by a majority of the eligible electorate of
the jurisdiction. While the City may not- wish to actually acquire
or construct housing, this Article has been interpreted by the
courts to more broadly limit actions available to the City.
Pio 3ne
Page Two
Specifically, the Article XXXIV authority will permit the City to
utilize assisted housing funds provided by HUD and the California
Housing Finance Agency for which the City may not now apply.
These funds can provide below market interest rate financing for
housing, direct subsidies for eligible tenants, or a variety of
other types of assistance.
The referendum is not a blanket authority but limits the City' s
participation to a number of units not to exceed five percent
of the total dwelling units in the City; and lastly, the refer-
endum forbids the commitment of General Fund Revenues for any
project developed under this approval.
These points are expanded upon in the attached memorandum provided
by the Orange County Housing Authority. Also attached is a letter
from the Authority' s Executive Director requesting the Council ' s
consideration of this matter.
FUNDING SOURCES:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; Housing and Com-
munity Development Program.
Respectfully submitted,
James W. Palin, Director
Development Services
JWP:SVK:gc
Attachments
®I%AI•ul_ COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
2043 North Broadway • Santa Ana, California 92706 • North Orange County No. (213) 694-1423
Central Orange County No. (714) 547-9133 • South Orange County No. (714) 768-0811 & (714) 768-0935
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson:Mary Lou Wheeler Vice-Chairperson:Harold Beck;Alflorence Crawford,Rav Mendoza,Paul Sepulveda,Ida Sternberg,Sandra Valdez
Executive Director: John L. Avitabile Counsel: H. Lawson Mead
March 3 , 1980 r 9 E (� E p y
E 0
MAR 5 198o
SPECIAL DELIVERY
C'Ty OF HUNTINNU-TO J SUCH
CITY COU"ICIL OFFICE
Honorable Donald MacAllister
Mayor of Huntington Beach
P. 0 . Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Re : Participation in Article XXXIV Referendum
Dear Mayor :
As you may already be aware , on February 27 , the Orange County
Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution, sponsored by the Hous-
ing Authority, which provides for an "Article XXXIV Referendum"
election within the unincorporated area of the county. A copy of
the resolution is an attachment to the enclosed memorandum which
describes the specifics of the referendum.
To summarize its contents briefly , passage of the referendum will
permit the county to receive state or federal funds for the con-
struction, development, or acquisition of rental housing for elderly,
handicapped and low- to moderate-income households within the
unincorporated area. Perhaps most significantly , it will also
enable the county to channel such financial assistance to the private
sector for the development of housing .
Of special interest: to cities within the county , is the provision
of the resolution which permits them to participate in the refer-
endum election upon passage of a resolution so electing . A city
participating in the election will have its vote tallied separately,
and if a majority of the voters within the city approve the refer-
endum, the city would be authorized to receive housing assistance
funds as described above .
uena Park Costa Mesa • Cypress • Fountain Valley • Fullerton • Huntington Beach • Irvine • Laguna Beach • La Habra • La Palma Los Alamitos • Newport Beach
Orange • Placentia • San Clemente • San Juan Capistrano • Seat Beach • Stanton • Tustin • Win Park • Westminster • Ynrba Lmda U rn_;n;,o.rr t Mea
March 3 , 1980
Page Two
The purpose of this letter is to advise you of this opportunity
for your city, and to urge you to consider , as soon as possible ,
whether you wish to participate in the election . Since the
measure will be placed on the ballot for the June 3 , 1980 primary
election, cities which wish to participate must file their resolu-
tion with the County Registrar on or before March 21 , 1980.
To aid your decision , I am enclosing a memorandum which provides
a more complete description of the rationale , purposes and impacts
of the referendum. Attached to it are copies of the County ' s
resolution and a proposed form of resolution electing to partici-
pate . If you wish additional information regarding the referendum
or forms of housing assistance which would become available upon
its passage , please do not hesitate to contact me . I would also
be glad to meet with city staff or to appear before your council ,
in order to provide such information to them.
Thank you for your attention in this matter .
Sincerely,
ORANGE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
John!% L.'-E��}tabile
E eeutive Director
JLA: rs
/Enclosures
cc w/enclosures : City Manager
Board of Supervisors
a•
MEMORANDUM CONCERNING
PROPOSED ARTICLE XXXIV REFERENDUM
BACKGROUND
As a recipient of the federal Community Development
Block Grant, Orange County and its cooperating cities are .
required to develop, adopt, and implement a "Housing
Assistance Plan" which identifies the housing needs of
low and moderate income households and identifies specific
steps that will be taken to try to meet those housing
needs. Over the past years, Orange County and. the cities
within the County, have been actively trying to meet the
identified housing needs by attracting developers and
assisting them in constructing and rehabilitating housing
for low and moderate income, elderly, and handicapped house-
holds.
Despite these efforts, the demand for affordable,
adequate housing has reached crisis proportions, due to
extremely low vacancy rates and inflation in the cost of
rental housing. Of the 662 ,000 households in Orange County,
127,709 , or 19 . 30 , pay more than 250 of their income for
housing, while making less than 80 of the median County
income.
Virtually all of the programs available to meet
these recognized needs are state or federally funded. Many .
of these programs involve direct agreements between HUD
and the developer, or landlord, such as the Section 8
program for new construction or existing units. Other
programs, however, involve funds which are made available
to local government for the construction, or financing of
construction, of housing.
Local governments may not, however, receive the
second category of funds (so-called "assisted housing"
funds) unless they have previously obtained the approval of
its citizens in an "Article XXXIV Referendum. " Article
XXXIV of the California Constitution requires referendum
approval before any "low rent housing project" is developed,
constructed, or acquired in any manner by any "state public
body. "
"Low rent housing project" is defined as any develop-
ment composed of urban or rural dwelling, apartments or
other living accommodations for low income persons , which
are financed in whole or part by the ?ederal Government
a
or a state public body. ;'State public body" is defined
1 he t as State, or an
as the t y city, city and county, county, district,
y, agency, or any other subdivision or public body.
IMPACTS OF LACK OF REr r,;ENDUM
�� AUlHORITY
At the present time, Orange County and most of the
cities within the County lack Article XXXIV authority. As
a result HUD and the California Housing Finance Agency
--J (CHFA) have not made "assisted housing" funds available to
Orange County, but only funds for
rent subsidies, which do not requireograms Articlesuch XXXIVSpaprSecovali 8
pro .
For the past two years, Orange Coun '
Section 8 funds, made by HUD, has been adjustedaveryation of
slightly upwards to compensate for the inability to receive
assisted housing funds. Assisted housing funds which
ordinarily would have been allocated to Orange County, were
instead allocated to those who had referendum authority.
L Beginning in fiscal year 1980 (ending September 30, 1980) ,
r:7 HUD will no longer adjust its allocations to reflect the
j absence of Article XXXIV authority. In other words , Orange
i County will henceforth receive an allocation composed of
both Section 8 rent subsidy funds and assisted housing funds
regardless of the County 's and cities ' present inability to
t utilize the latter.
Should Orange County continue to be unable to utilize
assisted housing funds, the funds would be transferred by
HUD to those local governments who could, i. e. , those local
governments having Article XXXIV authority. Orange County
would still have Section 8 rent subsidy funds, but they would
be proportionately smaller than in earlier years. As a
consequence, Orange County and the cities within it would be
destined to receive less than their "Fair Share' of federal
and state housing assistance funds in the overall sense.
To give an illustration, in fiscal year 1978 alone,
it was estimated by SCAG that approximate)
lion
assisted housing funds were not allocated to$Orange 2 . 2 lCountyfdue
to the absence of Article XXXIV authority. Extrapolated over
the 40 year life of the financing, this means a loss to the
cities within the County of federal funds in excess of
$80 million (not adjusted for inflation) . A similar loss would
occur each year the cities lacked referendum authority.
-2-
N a
s THE PROPOSED REFERENDUM
To address the potential problem, the Orange County
Housing Authority proposed to the Board of Supervisors on
February 19 that an Article XXXIV Referendum be placed on
the June 3 , 1980 general election ballot. After review by
the County' s Administrative Officer and further discussion
by the Board, the Board, on February 27 , adopted a resolution
' calling a special election for the referendum and consolidating
it with the general election. A copy is attached hereto as
Exhibit A. .
The language of the ballot measure is patterned after
two recent measures , which were utilized in successful
referenda in Riverside and San Bernardino County. Basically ,
the referendum provides authorization for utilization of
assisted housing funds for rental housing in the unincorporated
area of the County. Such housing would be available to the
elderly or . handicapped, as well as low and moderate income
persons.
The number of units built or rehabilitated pursuant
to the authority conferred would be limited to 50 of the
total dwelling units within the unincorporated area of
the County. Utilizing the most current statistics , this
would translate into approximately 4 , 400 total units for
the unincorporated county. Even with the additional funds
which would become available with referendum approval, only
a fraction of the total authorized units would be produced
in the foreseeable future.
The proposed ballot measure, as did the one utilized
in San Bernardino County, also provides for the participation
of cities within the County. Should a city wish to participate
in the election, it would be required to adopt a resolution
so requesting, and to file it with the Registrar before the
March 21 deadline. A form of resolution for such purpose,
prepared by the Housing Authority ' s special legal counsel,
Rutan & Tucker, is attached hereto as Exhibit B. In such
event, the County ' s resolution directs the Registrar to submit
separate election results for the unincorporated area and for
each "participating city" . The measure would only become
,. effective if a majority of the persons voting on the measure
in the participating city approve the measure.
Of special note to prospective participating cities ,
is the provision of the County 's resolution providing for
-3-
notice of hearing prior to application to HUD or CHFA for
funding of a specific project. This provision reassures the
citizenry and council of each participating city that they
retain ultimate approval of county 's housing under the
general authority conferred by the passage of the referendum.
Lastly, and perhaps most importantly in this :'Age
of max Rebellion" , the ballot measure provides that no
county or city general fund monies, as the case may be,
may be expended for such housing. This clause emphasizes
that the referendum is not a commitment of any local funds
or a bond issue. The cost of the election itself, approxi-
mately 10 cents per registered voter in participating cities ,
is an eligible Community Development Block Grant expenditure.
Ballot measures such as that proposed here , have
traditionally met with a favorable response from the
electorate .with approximately 810 of such referenda gaining
approval. In the two most recent referenda, those in
Riverside and San Bernardino Counties , measures very
similar to that proposed here received comfortable margins
of approval. For example, in San Bernardino County the
measure passed by nearly a two-to-one margin.
Having approved such a ballot measure , eligibility
. for assisted housing funds from HUD and CHFA seems
assured. The similar measures approved in San Bernardino
and Riverside Counties , have already received approval by
those agencies, and assisted housing funds have been
allocated as a result.
POSITIVE IMPACTS OF REFERENDUM AUTHORITY
A referendum under Article XXXIV will allow the
County and participating agencies to finance, develop or own
affordable rental housing units within their jurisdictions .
Equally important, it allows private developers to use
additional forms of CHFA financing for housing development,
and allows local government much greater flexibility in
assisting private developers to produce needed housing. The
referendum thereby makes available a substantial amount of
HUD and CHFA funds . It also would allow the County and
j participating cities a variety of ways in which to improve
the housing provided under programs already in use.
-4-
Y
No loss of tax revenue would result from the referendum,
since privately developed housing built under any of the
assisted housing programs pays full taxes , and publicly
owned or non-profit sponsered housing may make payments "in
lieu" of taxes to the city, county or special district in
which it is located. Additionally, because the referendum
makes more federal and state funds available, it would give
a boost to new construction and thereby increase local tax
revenues.
In the latter context, it must be ren.embered that
recent economic statistics show a downturn in economic
activity, particularly in construction of housing. While
Orange County will probably weather the "recession" in
better fashion than other parts of the state or nation,
approval of the Article XXXIV referendum will further
mitigate the recession' s effects by creating employment in
construction and related areas.
For all of the foregoing reasons , foremost of which
are the recognized need for low-rent housing and the
possible loss of funds for such housing, it is essential
that the ballot measure be presented to the voters at the
June general election. To permit this , a resolution
participating in the special election must be adopted, and
filed with the Registrar, at the earliest possible moment.
P
-5-
1 <
FECITY OF HUNTINCTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON!EACH
I y1
' To Gail Hutton From James W. Pal in, Director
City Attorney Development Services
Date February 2'7, . 1980
Subject p)+tOpOSED RESOLUTION; ARTICLE y
XNiCIV REFERENDUMz,' LOW INCOME
HOUSING . ,
'j' i,
The Orange County hoard of"Supervisors is tbnsiderihq the
passage of a resolution placing a referendum measure on the
June 180 ballot. The referendum is required by Article XXXIV
r; of the Califdrnia• Cbnstitution and if passed by the voters,
would permit broader public participation in the production
of low income rental housing.
N. Attached for your review is a copy of the proposed resolution
�.' considered by the Board of Supervisors. You will note that
it affords the City the opportunity to place the measure on
local ballots as well by City Council passage of a similar
resolution.
1 „would' like to 'r.equest that you prepare such a resolution
for consideration- by the City Council. The Council has been
appraised of the Supervisors' considerations and since a
resolution must'.be ,filed with the Registrar of Voters by
March 21, ;. 1980, I would like to request your cooperation at
t a time.,
f you should have any- questions, please contact Stephen V.
ler at .5542.
J SVK:gc ;
4
RECEIVED
• ' CRY OF HUNTIN�NEY
rON BEACH
AllFEB 27 .1980
;r; • 7iglgl�lUl�lxl�si4 PM
1i RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS i
2 '; OF"ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
3
4 On , 1980 on motion of .Su ervisor
5 , duly seconded and carried, the following
6 resolution was adopted:
: . 7 BE IT •BESOT:. p that the Board of Supervisors of the
s
8 County of Orange 'does hereby call an election pursuant to
9 Article 34 of the California Constitution for the purpose of
10 submitting to the voters the question whether low rent housing
11 projects shall be authorized within the unincorporated -areas of
12 the County of Orange and within participating cities.
13 BE IT ;FURTHER RESOLVED that said measure shall be
14 submitted to the voters of the unincorporated area of, the County
i
15 and any participating city at a special election to be helc'. and
16 conducted orw the 3rd day of June, 1980, and that the polls
17 shall, be open from the hour of 7:00 o'clock A.M. to 8 : 00 o'clock
18 P.M. on said election day. It is further ordered that said
19 election be; and it is, hereby consolidated with the General
20 Election .to: be held on said day and all precincts established,
21 and all election offieers •appointed, for said General Election
22 shall be the precincts And election officers for said General
23 Election, and said• election officers shall conduct said election
24 and . make return thereof. according to law.
` 25 BE IT' FURTHER RESOLVED that the Registrar of Voters is
26 instructed to place the measure on the ballot at said election in
27 the following form: .�
28
12/1.4/79
1I "Shdll� rental housing developments ,
f ;f.
ap -conte.mp � e by,' Aiticle 34 of the
3 California Constitution, for elderly,
4 handicapped, . low or moderate income
5 persons • be' 'tdeveloped, constructed,
g financed off:,acquired in the unincorporated
` 7 area. of the 'County of Orange and _
t: 8 in .participating..cities,. subject to the I
g following conditions:
10 'Housing built or rehabilitated
u suont to this measure shall not exceed.. I
11 P r � �
12 5% of the total dwelling units within the
13 unincorporated area of the County of
14 Orange or, for participating cities,
15 within the city..
16 "A city is a.` participating city if the
17 city ,council adopted a resolution requesting
18 parti,cipati'on in this measure and submitted
19 it to the Registrar of Voters on or before
20 Marc# 21, 1980.
21 � I"No county or city general fund
22 monias shall be expended for such housing. "
23
24 BE II FURTHER RESOLVED that this measure shall be submitted
25 to 'the vote*s of the unincorporated area of the County of Orange ,
an4 each n attici a'tin . cit , , and the Registrar of Voters is
26 p� p . ., g, y g.
27 directed' to conduct' the .election in said area and submit separates i
• _i, yid - ' .. . •,
28 election `re�ults.,I.®r said unincorporated area and' foe each
e
-2-
Z ) ity. This measure shall be effective in the
rarticipating c
21; unincorporat6d area of the County of Orange if a majority of the
3lpersons voting on the measure in said city approve the measure .
4 � BE _ITIFURTHER RESOLVED that notice be given that the
t �
5lfinal date fbr submission to the Registrar of voters of arguments,
• i
6 not to exceed 300 words in length, for or against this low
7- •rent housing; measure shall be 1980, and that suc:i '
8 arguments shall be submitted to the Registrar at the office of +
9 the Registralr, 1300 South Grand, Santa Ana, California, no later
10 than 5:00 o'lclock •P.M. on said day.
• 11
12 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the i
County. of Orange, California, by the following vote: i
13
AYES:
14 NOES:
ABSENT:
15
16 I,. Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors !of Orange County, California, hereby certify the
17 foregoing tq be a full true and correct copy of the record
of the acts n taken by said Board of Supervisors by vote of the
18 members presient as the same appears in the Official Minutes of
said Board of Supervisors at its meeting of -1980 .
19
20
21 Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors of
22 Orange County.
23
24
25
26
27
28
3-
. M �
J� City of Huntington Beach
P.O. Box 160 CALIFORNIA 92648 �I
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK j
I,
February 20, 1980
i
Orange,.County,Bo"ard of Supervisors
P.O. Box 687,
Santa Aha,.t,CA 92702
Attn: J11ne Alocander
Gentlemen: ,
The Board of.SNpervisors is hereby requested pursuant to
Section 23302 of the Elections Code to consent and agree
to the consolidation of the city's special municipal election
with the Statowi,de Primary Election on Tuesday, June 3, 1980.
The City, Council at its regular meeting held February 19, 1980,
adopted Resolution No. 4849. Enclosed are two certified copies.
Sincerely,
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
AMW:cb
enc.
. t
cc: Al Olson, Registrar of Voters
i
N �
i
City of Huntington Beach
+ r}, P.O. 13OX 190 CALIFORNIA 92649
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
February 20, 1980
I
Mr. A. E. Olson
Registrar of Voters
P.O. Box 11298
Santa Ana, CA 92711
Attn: Shirley Deaton
Dear Mr. Olson:
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular
meeting held February 19, 1980 adopted Resolution Nos. 4849 and
4850 pertaining to the city's Special Municipal Election to be
held June 3, 1980 with the Statewide Primary Election.
We have enclosed a certified copy of each resolution for your
information. Said Special Municipal Election will be held for
the purpose of submitting an advisory proposition to the voters
relative to the distribution of the state sales tax revenue.
Sincerely,
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
AMW:cb
enc.
i
i
1
j �!w City of Huntington Beach
"} P.O. BOX 160 CALIFORNIA 92640
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
f�
February 20, 1980
Martin & Chapman Co.
2131 Bixby Road
Lakewood, CA 90712
Dear Scott,
The City Council at its regular meeting held February 19, 1980
adopted Resolution Nos. 4849 and 4850 pertaining to the city's
Special Municipal Election to be held June 3, 1980 with the
Statewide Primary. Said election pertains to submitting to
the voters an advisory proposition on distribution of the state
sales tax revenue.
We have enclosed a copy of each resolution for your information.
Sincerely,
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
AMW:cb
enc.
i
i
t
I
I
i
I�
!i
1
r
City of Huntington Beach
�* P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92110 i
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
' II �
I
February 20, 1980
i
I
Mrs. Dora Clark
3401 E. Ruth Place
Orange, CA 92669
Dear Dora,
Enclosed is Resolution No. 4850, adopted by the City Council on
February 19, 1980, which authorizes certain council members to
file a written argument for a city measure.
We would appreciate it if you would translate the Advisory Proposition
portion (that portion outlined in red) and return it to our office
as soon as possible.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
AMW:cb
enc.
II
�i
IIi
A7k'
.S1
40
t
Advisory Vote Only
' ADVISORY PROPOSITION:
' That the Governor and
'Legislature apportion the ' YES '
'existing six cent sales and '
'use tax so that two cents
' rather than the one cent
' presently allocated, may -be-
'be used by local agencies
' for priority local services ' NO '
' rather than state distribu-
' tion or state reserves .
i 1 I
y
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Submitted by Alicia M. Wentworth Department City Clerk
Date Prepared February 11 , 1G80 Backup Material Attached a Yes No
Subject Resolution re: Special Municipal Election - 6/30/80 - To be held with the
Statewide Primary - Authorization for Certain Councilmembers to file a written argument
for City Measure
City Administrator's Comments
Approve as recommended.
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
Adoption of Resolution No. 4850 would authorize certain Council members to file a
written argument for the City Measure relating to the Advisory Proposition on dis-
tribution of State sales tax revenue, which is to be voted on at a Special Municipal
Election to be held 6/3/80 with the Statewide Primary.
RECOMMENDATION
Designdte•,personsFto write argument andsadopt:.Resolution"�No:.-4850,.if Council
desires to file a written argument.
ANALYSIS
Said resolution must be adopted if Council desires to file a written argument and to
comply with the Election Code of the State of California.
FUNDING SOURCE
Not applicable.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Do not authorize certain members to file a written argument.
W
Plo 3/78
!
I
1
RESOLUTION NO . 4850
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS
MEMBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT FOR A CITY
MEASURE !
I,
�!
WHEREAS , a special municipal election is to be held in the �
city of Huntington Beach on June 3, 1980 at which time there
will be submitted to the qualified electors of said city the
following city measure: i
'ADVISORY PROPOSITION:
' That the Governor and
'Legislature apportion the ' YES '
'existing six cent sales and
'use tax so that two cents
' rather than the one cent
'presently allocated, may
'be used by local agencies
' for priority local services ' NO '
' rather than state distribu-
' tion or state reserves .
I
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows:
That the City Council, being the legislative body of the
City of Huntington Beach, hereby authorizes :
Mayor Don MacAllister
I
Mayor Pro Tempore Bob Mandic
i
members of said body, to file a written argument for the city
measure set forth in the recital hereof in accordance with Article
4 , Chapter 3, Division 5 of the Elections Code of the State of
California and to change said argument until and including the
date fixed by the City Clerk after which no argument for or
-/ahb
2/8/80
i
--
I
against said city measure may be submitted to her.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th ,
day of February 1980.
j
I
Ma yo I'
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: (�
I
for II
City Clerk City Att ney
I
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: �I
•. I
iICikrj Administrator
I
t
• I
� • 1
2
P-q. No. 4850
" I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of f
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is 'seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative !;{{
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council 11
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day i
of February 1980 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:
Pattinson, Thomas, Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
i
NOES: Councilmen:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
i
i
1
I. '
Z� 17 E-2 P En
L
INTER-DF--FjAl-;'FMENT COMMUNICATION
RFALH
Tc City Administrator From City Attorney
Su!)icct lc-veloPment of Ar`,.,umeni Gs Date February 7, ! 980
for Ballot Proposition
The City Clerk' s office has requested us to prepare a resolution,
preparing the arguments and rebuttals to the advisory propos-j"_tion
regardinp, the state sales tax. It is the opinion of this office
that Administration is far better equipped to analyze the financial
and administrative arguments necessary to include in this -resolution .
P,,,.fsuar.t to our conversation, I am hereby requesting that a member of
your staf-f prepare such arguments and rebuttals in conjunction with-
this office , and we shall have Anne Brunson put them in resolution
form and then they will be reviewed for legal sufficiency. Please,
note that the Clerk has asked us for this to be ready for the agenda
d(-,Lldline of February 8 . 1980 for the February 19 , 1980 Council I-C.eet-
in,gl. ,Therefore , this matter should be expedited.
"T 1-1
City Attorney
GH: bc
cc : Ci-Gy Clerk
Special -Consolidated Election June 19830
Attachments
^3ENDA ROUTING SLIP
INITIATING DEPARTMENT City Cleric
SUBJECT Special Consolidated Election - June 80
AGENDA DEADLINE DATE 2/8/80
To Administration
MEETING DATE 2/19/80
ET LEGAL DEPARTMENT WITH EXHIBITS
[ ] INITIATING DEPARTMENT — REVIEW/APPROVAL By:
Yes No
[ 1 [ 1 Ordinance [ ) Exhibits
(y) [ ] Resolution ( ] Exhibits
[ ] [ ] Contract or Agreement [ ] Exhibits
[ J ( } Financial Impact Report — Unbudgeted items over $500
( 1 ( ) INSURANCE REQUIRED t' ��� ` •,
!'T`
( ) ( I BONDS REQUIRED
[ ] [ l RCA ;! t
( ] ADMINISTRATION '
fc,t�`�' `
[ 1 CITY CLERK FOR AGENDA
COMMENTS: Please prepare resolutions for Council. t)er attach. _.
PIO 12%�9
(0a CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
White City Attorney
REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES Canary City Clerk
f r Pink City Administrator
Goldenrod Departmental
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Date Request Made By reCity
partmont
1/31/80 Alicia M. Wentworth Clerk
INSTRUCTIONS: File request in the City Attorney's Office as soon as possible. Print or type facts necessary for City Attorney.Out-
line briefly reasons for the request. Attach all information and exhibits pertinent to the subject.
Type of Legal Service Requested:
[ ) Ordinance [ J Insurance ( ) Other
[XI Resolution [ ) Bonds
[ ) Contract/Agreement ( J Opinion
All exhibits must be attached,or this request will be returned to you.
( ) Exhibits Attached
Please prepare resolutions for Council regarding arguements and rebuttals, if
desired by Council, to the advisory proposition regarding State Sales Tax.
,I
r ca n
If for Council Action, If not for Council action,desired completion date Signature:
Agenda deadline /fi n cl/� /a
Council meeting 2/19/80
PIO 12/74
RESOLUTION NO. 4601
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE; CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS
MEMBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT FOR CITY
MEASURES
WHEREAS,, a regular general municipal election is to be
held in the city of Huntington Beach on June 6 , 1978, at which
time there will be submitted to the qualified electors of said
city the folloteing city measures :
MEASURES SUBMITTED TO VOTE OF VOTERS
PROPOSED CHARTER Al`lENDMENTS
P 4 t
j A Shall the existing charter,, with the
exception of the provisions mentioned ' YES
in Propositions B through F on this
ballot, of i,he City of Huntington Beach'
be repealed and in place thereof shall
the proposed charter provisions
approved by the City Council on ' NO
January 30o 1978, be adopted? P P
P P f
B Shall Section 500 of the existing ° YES
city charter be amended to provide
that no person shall be elected to the
Council for more than two consecutive ° NO
terms? P ,
- i %
d
NOW, THEREI ORI, , the City ( mines 1 ) I' t,Iw (' It „ 1' I'miI
{ }leach does hereby resolve , determine :iiid -rdor :1:- I'�' ! I . :..
That this City Council , 1,(, I tg tho lt,rl :• lrii Iv- Iwdv ., i'
City of Huntington Beach, hereby authors •ze :
Alvin M. Coen
Norma Brandel Gibbs;
Ron Shenkman
Ted W. Bartlett
members of said body, to file a written argument for the city
measures set forth in the recitals hereof in accordance with
Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 5 of the Elections Code of the
State of C,ali.fornia and to change said argument until and in-
cluding the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arp'JIUMtit,
for or against said city measures may be submitted to her.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at an adjourned regular meeting held on the 1 :t;h
day of March, 1978 .
Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTF?ST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Atto
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
City Administrator
i•.
3
STATE 0I CALIFORNIA )
COUM OF ORANCE
CITY OF HUAYTIR'CTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M. C-W7O'RTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of maid City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing recolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a m.3jority of all the members of said City Council
at ra regular �, ���� „ � snneting thereof held on the 13th day
Of � � ; 1978 by the following vote:
AYES: Counncil aa:
Bartlett, Coen Gibbs, Shenkman
DOES: Council n:
Siebert
ABSEAPi: Councilren:
Wieder, Pattinson
r
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk _
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Bench, California
LZ I nping irstr.smenf r,
c on filti In
01
«' o Clerk of tt�e C ty
r�. f�rt� and Ex-0„ici
C,.:;, f! �f the City ()I HUntington Beach, C 1
RESOLUTION NO. h6011
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY UP
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR THE
FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES
SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, Section 5014 . 5 of the Elections Cade of the
State of California (effective January 1 , 1978 ) authorize.,
the City Council , by majority vote , to adopt provisions to
provide for .the filing of rebuttal arguments for city measuves
submitted at municipal elections ;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Hunk inlrt"n
Beach, California, does hereby resolve , declare , determine and
order as follows :
SECTION 1 . That pursuant to Section 5014 . 5 of the Election,;
Code of the State of California , if any person submits an arnu-
meat against a city measure , and an argument has been Cited 5,
favor of the city measure , the City Clerk shall Immediate y sew(]
copies cf that argument to the persons filing the arF mckt. in
favor of the city measure . The persons Ciling the Lircuf uni i
favor of the city measure may prepare and submit a rebuts :: !
,argument not exceeding 250 words . The City Clark shi 1 :;uHd
copies of the argument in favor of the measure to the l,wr son:J
filing the argument against the city measure , who may pra; aro'
and submit a rebuttal argument to the argument In f Avop aC ,.I,c•
city measure not exceeding 250 words . The rabutthl wrCurm-hn:;
5hail be filed with the City Clerk not more than t,en ( 1 O ) day:;
after the final date for filing direct arFumynts . Hnbut cAl
arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the din a
arguments . Each rebuttal argument shill. .immud late ly ro l law tht
direct argument which it seeks to rebut .
a SECTION 2 . That the provisions of SeNt.i.on 1 shall oppl ,y
at the next ensuing municipal election ard n each municipal
be 1 .
election thereafter .
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a/�IdEdIV meeting thert.oC held on the
th day of March, 1976.
Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
'ty (: rW C ty A ey
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
F- C ty ministrator -
2.
STA E OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF O ANGE
CITY OF HUNTIN'GTON DE.ACH )
1 , ALICIA M. WENTJORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of. the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-offici.o Clerk of the
City Council of Dnid City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular ad ,ourned meating thereof held on the 13th day
Of MaKch , 192, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilman:
_ k�1.2, t. ( oP-a Gkbb, She nkman
NOES: Councilnen:
�_'bar. -
i
1
ABSENT: Councilmen:
Wieder, Pattinson i_ _____
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
The forefeing instrument is a correct Coo'•r og
the original on file in this office.
;Attes
City Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk Gf the City
�� Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Cal.
e1
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Submitted by Al i ri a M_ Wentworth Department City Clerk
Date Prepared February 4 , 19 80 Backup Material Attached FR Yes No
Subject Resolution re: Speci a l Municipal Fl er_ti on to be held 613/80 with ,the
Statpwidp Primary - Advisor,/ Proposition on distribution of State sales
tax revenue.
City Administrator's Comments
Approve as recommended Te,3 y
FAPPROVEID BY; CgOUNCII.
_ l 19 P
W C ERK
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE
June 3, 1980 is the date of the Statewide Primary Election. Resolution No. 4849
requests the Board of Supervisors to consolidate a Special Municipal Election of the
City of Huntington Beach with the Statewide Primary, pursuant to Elctions Code Section
23303 for the purpose of submitting to the electors of the City an advisory proposition
on the distribution of the State sales tax revenue.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. `�B`��
ANALYSIS
Said resolution must be adopted in order to comply with the Elec4&i,on Code of .the .St-0te
of California. The measure states inpart: "It is the will of the people of the City
of Huntington Beach that the Governor and Legislature apportion the existing six cents
sales and use tax so that two cents rather than the one cent presently allocated may
be used by cities, counties, and special districts for priority local services rather
than state distribution or reserves.
FUNDING SOURCE
General or Contingency Fund
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Do not hold said .election.
Pio ane
RESOLUTION NO . 4849
e
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUESTING THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO CON— I,
SOLIDATE A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF THE j4
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO BE HELD JUNE 3, i+
1980 WITH THE STATEWIDE PRIMARY ELECTION TO
BE HELD ON SAID DATE, PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS i
CODE SECTION 23302 I!
I�
WHEREAS , the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
has called a special municipal election in the city of Huntington !
Beach to be held on June 3 , 1980, for the purpose of submitting j
to the qualified voters of the city of Huntington Beach an I,
advisory proposition on distribution of the state sales tax
revenue, as set out hereinafter; and
It is desirable that said municipal election be consolidated
with the statewide primary election to be held on the same date
and that within the city of Huntington Beach the precincts ,
polling places and election officers of the two elections be the
same, and that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange
canvass the returns of the special municipal election and that i
said statewide primary election and special municipal election
be held in all respects as if there were only one election,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows:
SECTION 1 . That pursuant to the requirements of California
Elections Code Section 23302 , the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Orange be and it is hereby requested to consent and
agree to the consolidation of a special municipal election with
the statewide primary election on Tuesday, the 3rd day of June,
1980, for the purpose of submitting to the electors of the city j
of Huntington Beach an advisory proposition on distribution of
1
i
/ahb
1/30/80 1.
- I
!
I
4 the state sales tax revenue to appear on the ballot as follows:
' ADVISORY PROPOSITION:
' That the Governor and
'Legislature apportion the ' YES ' II
' existing six cent sales and
'use tax so that two cents
' rather than the one cent
I�
'presently allocated, may be
' be used by local agencies
' for priority local services ' NO '
' rather than state- distribu-
' tion or state reserves .
SECTION 2. Said Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized Ij
to canvass the returns of said special municipal election which
it is hereby requested to consolidate with said statewide primary
I'
election and said election shall be held in all respects as if ; I
there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall it
be used.
I
SECTION 3. Said Board of Supervisors is hereby requested to
issue instructions to the County Clerk to take any and all steps
necessary for the holding of said consolidated election.
SECTION 4. The City of Huntington Beach recognizes that
additional costs will be incurred by the county by reason of this
consolidation and agrees to reimburse the county for any such costs .
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk of the •City of Huntington
Beach is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolu-
tion with the County Clerk of the County- rrf Orange.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th
day of February, 1980.
i
' I
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
I i
City Clerk City Attorney
2
I
i
I
Ties. No. 4849
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day
of February 1980 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:
Pattinson, Thomas, MacAllister, Yoder, Finley
`i
NOES: Councilmen:
Mandic, Bailey i
i
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California !
t,,,te #7 - Council Minute- - 1/21/80
M .
. On motion by Pattinson, second MacAllister, Council adopted Resolution No. 4838
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Pattinson, Thomas, Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, ,Yoder, Finley
.NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RES NO 4833 - SO CALIFORNIA GAS CO; RES NO 4834 - SO CALIFORNIA EDISON CO REQUESTS D RATES - DEFERRED PENDING FURTHER INFOR TION
The City Clerk presented Resolution Nos. 4833 and 4834 for Council 's consideration.
Councilwoman Bailey stated that in her opinion, the resolutions do not give any
reason why the City is opposed to the proposed rate increases. Councilman Pattinson
requested that. these resolutions be deferred to the February 4, 1980 Council meeting,
pending an explanation from So. California Gas Co. and Southern California Edison
Co. for the proposed rate increases.
A motion was made by Pattinson, second Bailey, to defer resolution Nos. 4833 and
4834 to the February 4,� 1980 Council meeting. The motion carried unanimously.
MEADOWLARK AIRPORT BOARD RE UEST TO RE UIRE OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING - DENIED
MOTIONN FURTHER CONSTRUCTION - FAILED
The City Clerk presented a communication from the City Administrator regarding the
request of the Meadowlark Airport Board that the City require red obstruction lights
to be placed on buildings in the departure path of the airport runway, with instal-
lation and maintenance to be at the building owner's expense.
A motion was made by Pattinson, seconded by MacAllister, to direct staff to inform
the Meadowlark Airport Board that the City is legally unable to comply with their
request. The motion carried unanimously.
Discussion was held by Council as to whether the City was responsible for obstructive
lighting during the building process.
Following further discussion, a motion was made by Bailey, seconded by MacAllister,
to direct staff to ensure that any further construction in the path of the airport
runway have a condition for lights on structures over three stories in height.
Further discussion was held by Council on the merits of such direction, following`
which the motion failed by the following vote:
AYES: MacAllister, Bailey, Finley
NOES: Pattinson, Thomas, Mandic, Yoder
ABSENT: None
ADVISORY PROPOSITION ON SALES TAX - APPROVED - TIMETABLE AND RESOLUTION TO BE PREPARED
The City Administrator referred to his communication regarding the direction given
to staff at the December 17, 1979 meeting to investigate the recommendation of the
League of California Cities that an advisory proposition on distribution of State
sales tax revenues be placed on the City's local ballot. Considerable discussion
was held between Council on the matter.
~ Page #8 - Council nutes - 1121180
A motion was made by Pattinson, seconded by MacAllister, to place the advisory
measure on the June primary ballot, direct the City Clerk to prepare a detailed
timetable, and directed the City Attorney to prepare the proper resolution. The
motion carried as follows:
AYES: , Pattinson, Thomas, MacAllister, Yoder, Finley
NOES: Mandic, Bailey
ABSENT: None
AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXPEND CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS - APPROVED
The City Administrator referred to his transmittal recommending that he be permitted
the latitude to authorize purchase of capital items at $2,000 or less. He assured
Council that a monthly report would be prepared to insure that Council is aware of
all such purchases.
A motion was made by Pattinson, seconded by Yoder, to grant the City Administrator
latitude to authorize purchase of capital items at $2,000 or less.-
Discussion was held between Council and staff on the matter, following which a
roll call vote was taken on the motion, which carried as follows:
AYES: Pattinson, Thomas, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
NOES: Mandic
ABSENT: None
PROPOSED WETLANDS WORKSHOP - APPROVED - 2/4/80
The City Administrator referred to a communication from the Director of Development
Services requesting Council to set a Study Session on February 4, 1980 to discuss
a map and text, outlining those sites in the City determined by the State Department
of Fish and Game to be wetland areas.
A motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Finley, approving an adjourned meeting
of the City Council to be held on February 4, 1980 at 6:30 P.M. for the purpose of
conducting a Study Session to discuss sites in the City determined to be wetland
areas. The motion carried unanimously.
REQUEST FOR STUDY SESSION - HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM - PENDING
The City Administrator referred to a communication from the Senior Community Develop-
ment Specialist suggesting that Council set a Study Session in the near future in
order that he might arrange for speakers from the Los Angeles and Orange County
areas to meet with them.
Discussion was held by Council and it was determined that the matter would be
considered at a later date.
JOINT MEETING WITH ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD - TO BE DETERMINED
The City Administrator referred to a communication from the Chairman of the Environ-
mental Board, requesting Council to reschedule a joint meeting with the Environmental
Board some time after Janaury 24, 1980. Mayor MacAllister suggested that perhaps
March 3, or March 17, 1980 could be set aside for this purpose.
RECESS - RECONVENE
The Mayor called a recess of Council at 10:15 P.M. The meeting was reconvened
by the Mayor at 10:25 P.M.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT
Project Name Advisory Proposition on State Sales Tax
Description Place advisory measure on the June primary ballot to apportion 2
instead of I cent of the six cents sales tax to cities, counties and special districts.
1 . DIRECT PROJECT COSTS
1 . 1 One-Time Costs
Lana Furn. , ac -
Ac uisition Construction. ties, E ui ment. Other Total Cost
$ 5,000 $ 5,000
1 .2 Recurring Annual Costs
Additional Materials & utside
Pa roll Personnel Supplies Services Revenues Total Cos
1 .3 Replacement/Renewal Costs
None.
2. INDIRECT COSTS
None.
1 Financial Impact Rep%*
Page 2 - \
3. NON-DOLLAR COSTS
None.
4. BENEFITS TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROJECT
Possible doubling of sales tax revenue.
5. PROJECT USAGE
To obtain a "no strings" permanent source of funding for cities based on
redistribution of sales tax as opposed to increased taxes.
6. EXPENDITURE TIMING
Spring of 1980.
7. COST OF NOT IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT
Q
RESOLUTION NO . 4850
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS
MEMBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT FOR A CITY
MEASURE
WHEREAS , a special municipal election is to be held in the
city of Huntington Beach on June 3 , 1980 at which time there
will be submitted to the qualified electors of said city the
following city measure:
' ADVISORY PROPOSITION:
' That the Governor and '
'Legislature apportion the ' YES '
' existing six cent sales and '
' use tax so that two cents '
' rather than the one cent
' presently allocated, may be
' be used by local agencies
' for priority local services ' NO '
' rather than state distribu-
' tion or state reserves .
I
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows:
That the City Council , being the legislative body of the
City of Huntington Beach, hereby authorizes :
Mayor Don MacAllister
Mayor Pro Tempore Bob Mandic
members of said body, to file a written argument for the city
measure set forth in the recital hereof in accordance with Article
4 , Chapter 3 , Division 5 of the Elections Code of the State of
California and to change said argument until and including the
date fixed by the City Clerk after which no argument for or
/ahb
2/8/80 1 .
r
against said city measure may be submitted to her.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
4Ai Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th
day of February , 1980 .
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
' 7 for
City Clerk City Att ney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
71
Ci Administrator
171
2.
P No. 4850
OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
:J
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of
members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative
vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day
of February , 1980 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen:
Pattinson, Thomas, Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
NOES: Councilmen:
rM None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
The foregoing instrument is a correct copy
of the original on file in this office.
Attest ... 19t
City Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Cal.
..Deputy
•
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL !t-TION
Submitted by Floyd G. Belsito, Administrator Department Administration
Date Prepared January 9 119 80 Backup Material Attached Yes No
Subject ADVISORY PROPOSITION ON STATE SALES TAX
City Administrator's Comments
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
A p 11joa e as recommended.
CITY Lr
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: �('J
Statement of Issue: B
t the meeting of December 17, 1979, the City Council directed staff to investigate the
recommendation of the League of California Cities that an advisory proposition on distribution of
State sales tax revenue be placed on our local ballot.
Recommendation:
I. Place the advisory measure on the June primary ballot.
2. Direct the City Clerk to prepare a detailed timetable and the City Attorney to prepare the
proper resolution.
Analysis:
The measure states in part:
"It is the will of the people of the City of Huntington Beach that the Governor and
Legislature apportion the existing six cents sales and use tax so that two cents rather than
the present one cent be allocated to be used by cities and counties and special districts for
priority local services rather than by the State for state distribution or state reserves."
This measure is not binding, but is advisory only to the State Legislature. According to the
League, if the ballot measure is approved by the voters, it will be an important argument with the
Legislature that voters are extremely desirous of obtaining a "no strings" permanent funding
source for cities based on the redistribution of sales tax rather than increased taxes. Over 70
percent of the voters in the City of San Diego agreed with this position.
Other cities which have notified the League they will put this measure on their spring ballots
include Arcata, Azusa, Barstow, Bishop, Capitola, Chula Vista, Claremont, Colfax, Corning,
Coronado, Del Mar, El Centro, Fortuna, Glendale, Grand Terrace, Gridley, Livermore, Lomita,
Madera, Manteca, Marysville, Monrovia, Perris, Placentia, Placerville, Rocklin, San Gabriel, Santa
Barbara, Tustin, Upland, Wasco and Weed.
next page, please . . . . . . .
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION January 9, 1980
Advisory Proposition on State Sales Tax Page Two
The disadvantage of placing this measure on the June primary is that it may become a campaign
issue for candidates during our local elections culminating in April. In addition, if Jarvis II which
reduces state income should pass in June, it is unlikely that the State will divert any of its
remaining revenue sources to cities. However, one can never be certain of the outcome of
political dynamics.
In order to place this on the June ballot, a resolution calling a special election and requesting
consolidation with county services must be adopted at the April 7 City Council meeting. The City
Clerk estimates the expense to be a minimum of $5,000 for consolidating the advisory measure
with the County so that it may be on the June primary ballot.
Funding Source:
Contingency Fund. No funds are budgeted.
Alternative Actions:
I. Do not place on the June primary election.
2. Call a special election for another date (the City would have to bear the entire cost of the
election).
FGB:sh
Attachments: League of California Cities information packet
Financial Impact Report
/�� -t T. R. EGAN
�4 OUNTY OFC:> RANGE DIRECTOR
2._�, , 3 BARBARA FOX
5 "-, GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
SPECIAL SERVICES
REGISTRATION & ELECTIONS DIVISION
A. E. OLSON, REGISTRAR OF VOTERS MAILING ADDRESS:
1300 S. GRAND AVE. P.O.BOX 11298
SANTA ANA, CA 92705 SANTA ANA,CA 92711
(714) 834-2244
January 2, 1980
TO: ALL CITY CLERKS
FROM: REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
SUBJECT: ANNEXATIONS
It has been brought to our attention that annexations
completed on July 24, 1979 or later, will not become
effective until each county and city included in such
negotiation agrees, by resolution, to accept the nego-
tiated exchange of property tax revenues.
This office has already processed several annexations
after the above date by moving voters into the new pre-
cinct and changing the precinct boundary lines on our
precinct maps.
Since we are not aware of any agreements to finalize
annexations which were completed after July 23, we are
moving the voters back to their former precinct and
moving the precinct boundary lines back as they were
prior to the pending annexation.
We will not process any annexation by moving the voters
and precinct boundary lines until we receive written
notification from the city that the city and county
have agreed, by resolution, to accept the negotiated
exchange of property tax revenues, as required by AB8.
ro0_eltr
Shirley Deaton
Chief, Election Operations
®®® League of California Cities
California Cities
Work Togelhef Information Packet Relating to Local
Advisory Propositions on Distribution
of State Sales Tax Revenues
(1979 Annual Conference Resolution No. 62)
December 3, 1979
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
Page
Text of Annual Conference Resolution No. 62 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Text of Proposition C, on San Diego City Ballot
on September 18, 1979 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Election Procedures Regarding Local Advsiory
Ballot Propositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Ballot Arguments Utilized in San Diego Election . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7
- 1 -
1400 K STREET SACRAMENTO 95814 HOTEL CLAREMONT-BERKELEY 94705 900 WILSHIRE BLVD.SUITE 702 LOS ANGELES 90017
(916)444-5790 (415)843-3083 (213)624-4934
Text of Annual Conference Resolution No. 62 (Adopted at the 1979 Annual Conference,
San Francisco, September 25, 1979)
"RESOLUTION RELATING TO LOCAL ADVISORY PROPOSITIONS ON DISTRIBUTION OF STATE SALES
TAX REVENUE
"WHEREAS, local governments in California provide many essential public serv-
ices such as police protection, fire protection, and parks and recreation; and
"WHEREAS, of the 6% sales tax collected in California, only 1% is levied by
local agencies, the remainder being levied by the state for state distribution or
placement in state reserves; and
"WHEREAS, by adopting this resolution, the League of California Cities has no
intention of supporting a change in the distribution of the existing U local sales
tax; and
"WHEREAS, it is the position of the League of California Cities that of the
sales tax, 1j of the 4-3/4j retained by the state should be distributed to local
agencies; now, therefore, be it
"RESOLVED, by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities assembled
in Annual Conference in San Francisco, September 25, 1979, that the League encourage
all cities at an election prior to July 1, 1980, to include an advisory proposition
on the ballot requesting an expression of the public will, which advisory proposition
would read substantially as follows:
'Should the Governor and Legislature of the State of California
be advsied that:
'It is the will of the people of the City of that
the Governor and Legislature apportion the existing six cents sales
and use tax so that two cents rather than the present one cent be
allocated to be used by cities and counties and special districts
for priority local services rather than by the state for state dis-
tribution or state reserves.
'It is understood that if the Governor and Legislature so act, any
funds resulting therefrom which would cause the city to exceed a
spending limit imposed by a vote of the people of the City of
or the State of California shall, in accordance with
the provisions of the limitation, be returned to the people.
'Further, it is the will of the people that the Governor and Legis-
lature enact such allocation into law no later than July 1, 1980,
to avoid enactment of this proposal through the initiative process
to cure legislative default. "'
2 -
Text of Proposition C, as it appeared and was approved on the San Diego City
Ballot, September 18, 1979.
"PROPOSITION C
(THIS PROPOSITION WILL APPEAR ON THE BALLOT IN THE FOLLOWING FORM)
"PROPOSITION C. ADVISING THE GOVERNOR AND THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OF THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO TO HAVE ENACTED INTO LAW A RE-
ALLOCATION OF EXISTING SALES AND USE TAXES.
"Should the Governor and Legislature of the State of California be advised
that:
"It is the will of the people of the city of San Diego that the Governor
and the Legislature apportion the existing six cents state sales and use tax so
that two cents rather than the present one cent be allocated to be used by cities
and counties for priority local services rather than by the state for state services
or to the state surplus.
"It is understood that if the Governor and Legislature so act, any funds re-
sulting therefrom which would cause the city to exceed a spending limit imposed by
a vote of the people of the City of San Diego or the State of California shall, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 77 of the City Charter, be returned to
the people or expended for capital improvements.
"Further, it is the will of the people that the Governor and Legislature en-
act such allocation into law by no later than the first .of May 1980, to avoid the
unnecessary enactment by the people through the initiative process to cure legislative
default."
- 3 -
ELECTION PROCEDURES RHUARDING LOCAL ADVISORY
BALLOT PROPOSITIONS
The Elections Code (Section 5353) provides a mechanism for the public to voice
their opinion on substantive issues or to indicate to the local legislative body
approval or disapproval of the ballot proposal. The "advisory vote" means an
indication of general voter opinion and the results in no way are controlling
on the legislative body.
Procedures for placing an advisory measure on the ballot are briefly summarized
below. You should consult with your city clerk and city attorney regarding the
elections procedures to be followed.
Suggested Code
Date Citation
1. Council to place measure on ballot January 24) Elec. C.
2. Determine and announce deadline for ) §§4017, 4018, 5010-
submission of arguments January 24)
5016 and 22807
3. City attorney to prepare synopses and may
be requested to prepare impartial analysis February 13 Elec. C. §5011
4. Prepaid cards to order synopses February 18 Elec. C. §4018
5. Public notice of nominees and measures February 28 Elec. C. §§22833-
22835
6. 'Committees supporting/opposing measures
1st statement due February 28) Gov. C. §§84200-
2nd statement due March 27 ) 82205
3rd statement due June 12 )
Suggestions Regarding Advisory Election Procedures:
- While not apparently required by law, ordering submission of the advisory
measure to the electors of the city at the general municipal election should
probably be published to be cautious and avoid any allegations of lack of
notice.
- Since there appears to be no deadline for submission of advisory ballot mea-
sures, the controlling factor is the time required locally to prepare the
necessary sample ballot materials.
City clerks usually prefer to publish any notice of deadlines for submittal
of ballot arguments at the same time as the Notice of 'Election (i.e. required
between January 10 and January 24, 1980) in order to give notice of measures
that will be on the ballot.
- Regarding an impartial analysis of the measure, under Elections Code Section
5011 the governing body may request the city attorney to prepare an impartial
analysis of the measure.
- 4 -
- Campaign Disclosure. If groups form to support or oppose the advisory
ballot measure qualify as "committees" under the Political' Reform Act,
then campaign statements will have to be filed as required by law.
Statements are to be filed 40 days prior to the election, 12 days
prior, and 65 or less days after the election (February 28, March 27,
June 12) .
- Advisory Vote Outside City Boundaries. Section 5353(d) of the Elections
Code apparently permits the sponsoring legislative body to call for an
advisory vote outside the territory of the jurisdiction if the residents
of that territory are affected by the issue and if the advisory election
can be consolidated with the regular or special elections in such terri-
tory. However, there would be additional election costs involved.
K
- 5 -
Ballot Arguments Utilized in San Diego Election
"ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF PROPOSITION C
"Want to send a message to Sacramento? Then Vote Yes on Proposition C!
Ask yourself, what public services are of the greatest importance to you?
Police protection?
Fire protection?
Libraries?
Parks and recreation?
All these services are provided by local government and essential to a good quality
of life.
Certainly they are of far greater value than those championed by overstaffed state
and federal bureaucracies, which produce questionable benefits to the public while
unquestionably devouring your tax dollars.
Did you know that the state collects locally a 6% sales tax, yet returns only slightly
more than l%? The rest stays in Sacramento where a massive budget surplus has proven
to be an irresistible temptation for Sacramento politicians to underwrite their pet
projects.
Yet, local government is faced with having to reduce or hold the line on these most
important public services.
It simply does not make sense!
Proposition C tells Sacramento it had better get the priorities straight, and address
our most critical needs without increasing the tax burden.
Proposition C proposes that some of that money that now goes to and is spent in
Sacramento be returned to local government so that city and county government does
not have to be concerned with providing you with the kind of police and fire pro-
tection or other critical services you need and deserve.
Remember that our spending limit and that proposed under the 'Spirit of 13' initiative
requires that any extra revenue would have to be returned to you or be used for much
needed public improvements.
No wonder that Paul Gann, coauthor of Proposition 13 and the new spending limit, sup-
ports Proposition C.
San Diego Taxpayers Association supports Proposition C.
To assure essential local services, to reduce that massive surplus in
Sacramento, vote for local control and for Proposition C.
PETE WILSON CARLETON LICHTY
Mayor President
City of San Diego San Diego Chamber of Commerce
BILL LOWERY JACK PEARSON
Councilman President
City of San Diego San Diego Police Officers Association"
J. BRUCE HENDERSON
President
Association of Concerned Taxpayers
"ARGUMENT AGAINST PROPOSITION C
"Opposition to diversion of sales tax.
In passing Proposition G & J, 75% of the voters in San Diego voted to establish spend-
ing limits in the county and city respectively. Proposition 13 was overwhelmingly
passed by the voters in an effort to tell government to cut back their spending, not
increase it. Proposition C asks you the voters, whether or not you want to have the
f
Governor and state legislature allocate U of the state sales and use tax to local
governments rather than the current U. I believe that this is not the will of the
people. This proposal is in direct opposition to the philosophies set forth by
Propositions G, J, & 13, which preclude the need for any addi.tional revenues.
The real issue we need to address is not where our revenues will come from, and how
much, but is one which deals with the current inequities of our tax system. Proposi-
tion C does not address the issues of tax inequities. What is required is a major
overhaul of our present tax system based on evaluations of public services from a
regional perspective.
As a result of these propositions, local governments are cutting back unnecessary fat,
and effectively consolidating departments and programs. Asking for additional revenues
will put us right back where we started. I urge you to vote no on Proposition C.
JIM BATES
Supervisor Fourth District"
7 -