Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBeach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project - Appeal filed by Mayor Do City ®f Huntington Beach 200o Main Street ♦ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 ♦ www.huntingtonbeachca.gov Office of the City Clerk ` Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk NOTICE OF ACTION February 9, 2012 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach CA 92648 SUBJECT: Appeal of the Planning Commission's Failure to Certify Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 10-004 (Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project) APPLICANT: City of Huntington, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LOCATION: 2.74 acre site at the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue DATE OF ACTION: February 6, 2012 On Monday, February 9, 2012, the Huntington Beach City Council held a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by Mayor Don Hansen of the Planning Commission's failure to certify EIR No. 10-004 (Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project). The City Council voted to certify EIR No. 10-004 by adopting Resolution No. 2012-05 certifying the final Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2011091-22) for the Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project. If you have any questions, please contact Rosemary Medel, Associate Planner at (714) 374- 1684, or the Planning Department Zoning Counter at (714) 536-5271. S erely a Jo L. Flynn, CIVIC City Clerk JF:rI c: Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building Rosemary Medel, Associate Planner Morrie Golcheh, Progressive Property Management, 10537 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 350, Los Angeles, CA 90025 Attachments: Copy of Resolution No. 2012-05 Pages 5-6 of the February 6, 2012 City Council Action Agenda Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan ♦ Waitakere, New Zealand changes made to the California Health and Safety Code Approved for introduction January 17, 2012 Recommended Action: Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3931, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Chapter 8.04 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code Relating to Food Handling Establishments." Approved 7-0 8. Adopt Ordinance No. 3932 adding Municipal Code Chapter 5.90 regarding Safe and Sane Fireworks sale and discharge Approved for introduction January 17, 2012 Recommended Action: Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3932, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Adding Chapter 5.90 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code Relating to Fireworks." Approved 5-2 (Shaw, Boardman no) PUBLIC HEARING 9. Conduct a public hearing, approve and accept expenditure of the County of Orange Supplemental Law Enforcement Services (SLESF) Grant in the amount of$200,000 for Fiscal Year 2011-2012 Recommended Action: A) Conduct a public hearing; and, B) Approve the acceptance of SLESF grant for funding fiscal year 2011-12; and, C) Authorize the Chief of Police to expend $200,000, plus any accrued interest; and, D) Appropriate $200,000 plus any accrued interest to purchase the new laser scanning system and new Motorola radios; and, E) Approve the change proposal for the FY2010-11 SLESF funding to purchase the new laser scanning system. Approved 7-0 10. Approve Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 10-004 (Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project) by adopting Resolution No. 2012-05 Recommended Action: Certify EIR No. 10-004 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements by approving Resolution No. 2012-05, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Certifying the Final Environmental -5- City Council/PFA Meeting February 6, 2012 Impact Report (SCH#2011091022) for the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project." 10 Speakers Approved 5-2 (Shaw, Boardman no) 11. Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 09-002 (Wireless Communication Facilities) amending Section 230.96 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO) by approving for introduction either Ordinance No. 3933 or 3934 Planning Commission Rersemmended AGtien! A) ApPFOve Zoning Text Amendment 'ww i re a CUP to the Zommne Admi Zoning fret--all +-�yrM alesr GemmuniGataGn faGilitiec. 9 evi.l�+e� "na G le roc. and r od"fi leGated within 11 200 fee$ of G7iTi.fFg7T1'CfTV-Y'0�Lit7TTJ riG CBb1"f��V6Y�CC��TC1'1'177���VT rec irler4i.�1 .�.�iA vr�wr�rA n n ■+iw maul rere+oMl�A �T�T�.,--�e��.dthe—Go loGatfeT,--req er eH mounted faG"lities to a 2.500 fOOt Fadaus,with findings fGF appFOval; and, Huntington Rennh Amending Section 230.96 of the Huntington RennhZoning " Staff Recommended Action: A) Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 09-002 and require a CUP to the Zoning Administrator for new ground and utility mounted (freestanding) wireless communication facilities only with findings for approval; and, B) Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3934, "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending Section 230.96 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance Relating to Wireless Communication Facilities," as amended to revise language on Page 5, #4, "any"to "all." 6 Speakers;Approved 4-3 (Shaw, Harper, Boardman no) COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS (Not Agendized) Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr, Boardman reported. ADJOURNMENT- 10:06 PM The next regularly scheduled meeting is Tuesday, February 21, 2012, at 4:00 PM in Room B- 8, Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. INTERNET ACCESS TO CITY COUNCIL/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA AND STAFF REPORT MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT http://Www.huntin-qtonbeachca.gov -6- City Council/PFA Meeting February 6, 2012 Council/Agency Meeting Held: ;LA0ZAq -& Deferred/Continued to: Ap roved Ll Conctitionally A proved ❑�e e City CI rk's ignatu AS Council Meeting Date: February 6, 2012 Department ID Number: PL 12-004 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Building SUBJECT: Approve Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 10-004 (Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project) by adopting Resolution No. 2012-05 Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal of the Planning Commission's action on Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004. The EIR analyzes a mixed use development proposal at the southeast corner of Beach and Ellis. Mayor Don Hansen filed an appeal to allow the City Council an opportunity to review the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project EIR on the merits of its analysis. The Planning Commission failed to certify or deny EIR No. 10-004 on December 13, 2011 due to a 3-3-1 vote. Staff is recommending that the City Council approve and certify the EIR because it adequately analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project, identifies project alternatives, provides mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) Program EIR and General Plan policies, and has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Financial Impact: Not applicable ' Recommended Action: Motion to: Certify EIR No. 10-004 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements by approving Resolution No. 2012-05, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2011091022) for the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project" (Attachment No.1). Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. Continue EIR No. 10-004 and direct staff accordingly. 2. Deny EIR No. 10-004 with findings for denial. HB -173- Item 10. - 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/6/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-004 Analysis: , . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . > ., . . , A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Property Owner: Morrie Golcheh, Progressive Property Management, 10537 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 350, Los Angeles, CA 90025 Location: The proposed project is located on a 2.74 acre site at the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue EIR No. 10-004 represents a request to analyze the potential development of up to 105 residential units, 37,000 square feet of retail space, 483 parking spaces (220 retail and 263 residential parking spaces), 1,850 square feet of public open space, and 10,500 square feet of private open space on 2.74 acres located at the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue. The proposed project improvements include the development of a six-story mixed use project with an internal parking structure allowing for retail along Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue at both the ground and second level with residential units above. Level three accommodates 263 residential parking spaces with levels four through six accommodating the residential units and the residential open space. The ground-level public open space is provided at the corner of Beach Blvd and Ellis Ave. Under the proposed project the existing service station, restaurant and retail uses would be demolished. The environmental impact report discusses potential adverse impacts in the areas of aesthetics, biological resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, air quality, cultural resources, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, utilities and service systems, hazards and hazardous materials, and climate change. The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the proposed project are addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives. The EIR consists of three volumes. Volumes I and II are the Draft EIR and Appendices that were circulated for a minimum 45-day public review period. Volume III is the Final EIR, which includes the comments received during the public review period, responses to those comments and text changes to the Draft EIR to clarify or correct information in response to comments or as identified as necessary by staff. These volumes are referenced as Attachment No. 3. This EIR is an informational document and does not represent the approval of a project for development. If the EIR is certified, then the next step is for a development application with detailed plans to be submitted for review and approval by separate action. B. BACKGROUND: The proposed project is located within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP), adopted in March 2010. Development of the project site was included in the Notice of Preparation for the BECSP EIR and analyzed as part of the larger scope of Item 10. - 2 xB -1 74- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ,ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/6/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-004 development contemplated for the BECSP EIR (Program EIR No. 08-008), which anticipated approximately 120 dwelling units, 71,000 square feet of retail commercial area and a two- level health club on the project site. As such, the analysis in Draft EIR No. 10-004 is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR where appropriate. The project site area includes two parcels. One consists of an existing gas station (Shell) and a building with two service bays totaling 1,678 square feet. The other consists of an existing one and two story building with 22,080 square feet of retail and restaurant uses and 4,026 square feet of office space. C. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the EIR on December 13, 2011. There was one speaker, who is a property owner in the area, that voiced concerns related to traffic, building height and affordable housing stating that the project will make an already predominantly rental area worse as tenants are not as concerned as owners. Issues discussed by the Planning Commission included hazardous remediation and final building occupancy, traffic impacts, and traffic methodology. Additionally, the Planning Commission stated their concern with not having the ability to evaluate the EIR against an actual project. Both a motion to certify and a motion to deny the EIR failed. Planning Commission Action on December 13, 2011 The motion made by Bixby, seconded by Farley to deny the certification of EIR No. 10-004 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements failed by the following vote: AYES: Bixby, Farley NOES: Sheir-Burnett, Peterson, Delgleize, Ryan ABSENT: Mantini ABSTAIN: None MOTION FAILED The motion made by Ryan seconded by Sheir-Burnett to certify EIR No. 10-004 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements by approving Resolution No. 1657 failed by the following vote: AYES: Sheir-Burnett, Delgleize, Ryan NOES: Farley, Bixby, Peterson ABSENT: Mantini ABSTAIN: None MOTION FAILED HB -175- Item 10. - 3 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/6/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-004 D. APPEAL: An appeal was filed by Mayor Don Hansen on December 16, 2011 (Attachment No. 2) in order to allow the opportunity for the City Council to discuss the adequacy of the EIR in general. E. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: A complete project analysis, overview and conclusions of EIR No. 10-004 are provided in the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment No. 4). The analysis below focuses on the appeal filed by Mayor Don Hansen. Based on the Planning Commission's discussion and failed motions, the analysis also briefly discusses two issues raised during the December 13, 2011 Planning Commission public hearing. EIR Overview The EIR provides a detailed analysis of potential impacts associated with the proposed project. It is intended to serve as an informational document for decision makers. This EIR identifies significant or potentially significant environmental effects, as well as ways in which those impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels, whether through the imposition of code requirements (CR's), mitigation measures (MM's), or through the implementation of alternatives to the project. In practice EIR's function as a technique for fact-finding, allowing future applicants, concerned citizens, and staff an opportunity to collectively review and evaluate baseline conditions and project impacts through a process of full disclosure. The Planning Commission staff report dated December 13, 2011, provides a detailed discussion regarding the Scope of EIR Analysis related to 15 issue areas. Through the use of appropriate mitigation measures identified in the EIR, the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be mitigated to a less-than- significant level. However, there are one project-specific and three cumulative significant adverse environmental impacts anticipated from the proposed project that cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures. The significant adverse environmental impacts are as follows: Air Quality > Project Specific and Cumulative—Construction of the proposed project would violate an air quality standard as it would result in emissions that exceed the SCAQMD threshold of significance for VOCs. Transportation/Traffic > Cumulative—Under 2030 conditions, operation of the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to an unacceptable Level of Service at two City intersections. > Cumulative—Under 2030 conditions, operation of proposed project would cumulatively contribute to an increase in delay at two Caltrans intersections and would increase traffic to the I-405 northbound loop ramp, which is currently deficient. Item 10. - 4 HB -1 76- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/6/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-004 Air Quality The EIR analysis focuses on the nature and magnitude of the change in the air quality environment due to the implementation of the proposed project. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project would result from construction activities, operation of uses allowed under the proposed Specific Plan, and project-related traffic volumes. Air quality modeling was completed consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) recommendations. A detailed discussion of the air quality impacts can be found beginning on page 4.2-1 of the EIR. Transportation/Traffic The traffic study was conducted by Austin-Foust Associates and analyzed potential adverse traffic impacts on the immediate area surrounding the project site and the intersections of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue, Main Street and Ellis Avenue, and Beach Blvd and Talbert Avenue as well as the BECSP study area. Intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service with implementation of the BECSP mitigation measures including those within the immediate vicinity of the project site. However, the project will contribute to the cumulative impacts identified within the BECSP Program EIR. Traffic At the Planning Commission meeting there were concerns raised about the amount of traffic at the project intersection and potential impacts to traffic flow. There was discussion about traffic analysis methodology and how the project's circulation and vehicular egress would affect traffic on Ellis in particular. Data used to prepare the Transportation and Traffic analysis in the Beach and Ellis EIR were taken from the City's General Plan Circulation Element, Beach-Edinger Specific Plan Traffic Study dated August 2009 and Traffic Analysis for Beach and Ellis Project dated July 21, 2011 (Appendix D of Volume II- Beach and Ellis EIR). The analysis provides an assessment of existing conditions in and around the project study area. As part of the environmental analysis of the BECSP, intersection capacity utilization (ICU) analysis was performed at intersections throughout the overall BECSP area. ICU values are used to determine levels of service at study area intersection locations and provide a means to quantitatively estimate incremental traffic impacts. The traffic related to the proposed project has been calculated by determining the average daily trips (ADT) and Peak Hour trips generated from the project site based on land use characteristics and quantities. Traffic is analyzed at the project specific level based on trip generation and trip distribution. The proposed project would result in a 30 percent decrease in the AM peak hours, 37 percent decrease in the PM peak hours, and an overall 43 percent trip reduction for ADT compared to the land uses approved under the BECSP, which can be contributed to the reduced commercial square footage. Compared to existing conditions, the project would result in an increase in the AM and PM peak hours but it would be a less than significant increase in ADT overall. BECSP Mitigation Measures MM4.13-1 through MM4.13-18 require mitigation of the project's contribution to intersections and freeway ramp determined to be significantly impacted as a result of implementation of the BECSP through payment of fees that would provide the project's fair share toward improving those intersections. HB -177- Item 10. - 5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/6/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-004 In regards to project access and impacts on Ellis Avenue, assessing operational impacts associated with the proposed project and project alternatives immediately adjacent to the site was considered as part of the EIR. All of the proposed project scenarios result in the consolidation of driveways and moving the main access points further from the main intersection of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue. Each of the new development scenarios considered in the EIR would result in more new trips on the local street system than the current uses generate. However, the vehicle activity level or "driveway trips" associated with the uses is more critical to consider in assessing street operations immediately adjacent to the site. The existing gas station is a significant source of driveway activity at the current site. While many of those trips are not "new" trips on the street system and therefore not reflected in the trip generation comparisons, they substantially affect traffic operations near the intersection of Beach and Ellis. The driveways are very close to the intersection and are very active throughout the day. Eliminating these trips and relocating the access points farther from the intersection provide improved access to the site while minimizing the effects on through traffic on both Beach and Ellis. The increases in new trips on the street system for the proposed project compared to the existing condition are nominal, and would easily be offset by the elimination of the gas station vehicle activity and improved driveway location. The two alternative projects would generate substantially more traffic than the proposed project and the existing uses, though similar to the land uses assumed in the BECSP Program EIR. Overall, the street layout and anticipated driveway locations provide reasonable opportunities for ingress and egress to the site while minimizing impacts to the through traffic movements. Review of the conceptual access plans for the proposed project and alternatives did not reveal any potentially significant operational issues. More detailed reviews of the access will be performed during the review of more detailed site plans as they are developed and submitted for approval. Hazardous Remediation The second issue raised by the Planning Commission related to on-site Hazardous remediation. The EIR analyzes the existing physical setting of the project site as it relates to hazards and hazardous materials and its potential impact on human health resulting from implementation of the proposed project. The EIR documents that in January 2007 the existing gas station and dry cleaning facility were identified to be of potential environmental concern. The EIR discusses that the active gas station is a Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) site with on-going remediation of soil and quarterly groundwater monitoring under the oversight of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) and Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). Various work plans have been submitted to and approved by OCHCA to remediate any existing conditions. Due to the type of contamination resulting from the LUST, remediation efforts remain active at the project site and will be ongoing with implementation of the proposed project. The dry cleaner's facility remediation was completed in 2010. The EIR concludes that with implementation of existing code requirements and Mitigation Measures MM4.6-1 through MM4.64 all impacts would be less than significant. Item 10. - 6 HB -178- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/6/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-004 The Commission expressed confusion regarding the contamination issues and how grading could occur if there is a contaminated site. Staff explained that the precise grading plan is under the oversight of the OCHCA and that there are various methods used under the work plan that can be considered and ultimately approved by OCHCA on a per site basis. For example, minor soil gas impacts will be addressed as part of the property redevelopment, as excavation for the building is anticipated to remove any residual impacts beneath the dry cleaners site. Similarly, although excavation beneath the Shell site is unlikely to result in a complete removal of impacted soil (as contamination extends deeper than the projected depth of excavation), site redevelopment activities are likely to significantly reduce the extent of soil contamination. In addition, after the removal of the Shell station's LUST systems, Shell is anticipated to perform over-excavation of any impacted soil, which is likely to be encountered beneath the tanks and dispensers. Due to the location of the property in the City of Huntington Beach Methane Overlay District, the project is anticipated to include a building protection system (or, a methane mitigation system). The building protection system will effectively isolate the development from any remaining subsurface impacts, and as such, eliminate the human health risks associated with the current use of the Shell site. The current remediation efforts at the Shell site are likely to continue for the foreseeable future. Therefore, the proposed project will include provisions to allow for these efforts to continue unhampered, such as lowering and/or relocation of groundwater monitoring and/or remediation wells and/or equipment. It should be noted that the garage traffic during typical working hours is likely to be less than that of a busy corner gas station, thereby minimizing both the on-site time of Shell's/contractor personnel and public exposure to any sampling, maintenance or other activities at the wells. Based on the foregoing it is expected that occupancy would be approved with the ongoing remediation as a concurrent project. F. SUMMARY Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004 serves as an informational document with the sole purpose of identifying potential environmental impacts associated with the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project, alternatives that minimize those impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures. Staff recommends that the City Council certify EIR No. 10-004 because: ■ The EIR has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act; ® The EIR adequately addresses the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project; and • The EIR identifies project alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with the BECSP Program EIR and General Plan policies. Environmental Status: Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 10-004 analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the project. The EIR also provides an analysis of potential alternatives pursuant to CEQA. Staff supports the EIR as adequate and comprehensive in the analysis of the project and the potential environmental impacts. Based HB -179- Item 10. - 7 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 2/6/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL 12-004 on the certified Program EIR for the Beach and Edinger Corridor Specific Plan (SP14), the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the SP 14 and the project specific analysis and Final EIR staff is recommending certification of EIR No. 10-004 as adequate and complete. Strategic Plan Goal: Maintain financial viability and our reserves Attachment(s): 1. City Council Resolution No. 2012-05, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2011091022) for the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project." 2. Appeal Letter From Mayor Don Hansen 3. Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004 — Not Attached (Available at City Hall-3 Id Floor Planning and Building Department) 4. Planning Commission Staff Report Dated December 13, 2011 5. Power Point Presentation Item 10. - 8 HB -180- ATTACHMENT # 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH#2011091022) FOR THE BEACH AND ELLIS MIXED USE PROJECT WHEREAS, Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004, State Clearinghouse #2011091022 ("EIR") was prepared by the City of Huntington Beach ("City") to address the environmental implications of the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project(the"Project"); and On July 31, 2009, a Notice of Preparation/Initial Study for the Project was prepared in conjunction with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (`BECSP") Program EIR and distributed to the State Clearinghouse, other responsible agencies, trustee agencies and interested parties; and After obtaining comments received in response to the Notice of Preparation, and comments received at the public scoping meeting held on August 21, 2009, the City completed preparation of the BECSP Program EIR, which was adopted on December 8, 2009; and As development on the project site was included in the Notice of Preparation for the BECSP EIR and analyzed as part of the larger scope of development contemplated in the BECSP EIR (Program EIR No. 08-008), which anticipated approximately 120 dwelling units and 71,000 square feet of commercial area on the project site, Draft EIR No. 10-004 is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR; and The City filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse on September 2, 2011, and the Draft EIR was circulated for public review and comment from September 9, 2011 to October 24, 2011, and was available for review at several locations including City Hall Planning and Building Department, City Clerk's Office, Central Library and the City's website; and Public comments have been received on the Draft EIR, and responses to those comments have been prepared and provided to the City Council as a section within a separately bound document entitled `Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project Environmental Impact Report Final EIR" (the "Responses to Comments"), dated November 2011; and Public Resources Code 21092.5(a) requires that the City of Huntington Beach provide a written proposed response to any public agency that commented on the Environmental Impact Report, and the Response to Comments included in the Final Environmental Impact Report satisfies this provision; and The City Council held a public meeting on the EIR on February 6, 2012 and received and considered public testimony. 12-3168/74987 1 Resolution No. 2012-05 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15132, the Final EIR for the Project is comprised of the Draft EIR and Appendices, the comments received on the Draft EIR, the Responses to Comments (including a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR), the Text Changes to the Draft EIR (bound together with the Responses to Comments) and all Planning and Building Department Staff Reports to the City Council, including all minutes, transcripts, attachments and references. All of the above information has been and will be on file with the City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Building, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. SECTION 2. The City Council finds and certifies that the Final EIR is complete and adequate in that it has identified all significant environmental effects of the Project and that there are no known potential environmental impacts not addressed in the Final EIR. SECTION 3. The City Council finds that all significant effects of the Project are set forth in the Final EIR. SECTION 4. The City Council finds that although the Final EIR identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the Project is approved, all significant effects which can feasibly be mitigated or avoided have been mitigated or avoided by the incorporation of standard conditions and requirements, and by the imposition of mitigation measures on the approved Project. All mitigation measures are included in the "Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist" (also referred to as the "Mitigation Monitoring Program") attached as Exhibit"A"to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 5. The City Council finds that the Final EIR has described reasonable alternatives to the Project that could feasibly obtain the basic objectives of the Project (including the "No Project" Alternative), even when these alternatives might impede the attainment of Project objectives. Further, the City Council finds that a good faith effort was made to incorporate alternatives in the preparation of the Draft EIR and that a reasonable range of alternatives was considered in the review process of the Final EIR and ultimate decisions on the Project. SECTION 6. The City Council finds that no "substantial evidence" (as that term is defined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15384) has been presented that would call to question the facts and conclusions in the EIR. SECTION 7. The City Council finds that no "significant new information" (as that term is defined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5) has been added to the Final EIR after circulation of the Draft EIR. The City Council finds that the refinements that have been made in the Project as a result of clarifications in the mitigation measures and EIR text do not amount to significant new information concerning the Project, nor has any significant new information concerning the Project become known to the City Council through the public hearings held on the Project, or through the comments on the Draft EIR and Responses to Comments. 12-3168/74987 2 Resolution No. 2012-05 SECTION 8. The City Council finds that the Mitigation Monitoring Program establishes a mechanism and procedures for implementing and verifying the mitigations pursuant to Public Resources Code 2108.6 and hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program. The mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the Project prior to or concurrent with Project implementation as defined in each mitigation measure. SECTION 9. The City Council finds that the Final EIR reflects the independent review and judgment of the City of Huntington Beach City Council, that the Final EIR was presented to the City Council, and that the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR prior to approving a project located on the subject properly. SECTION 10. The City Council finds that the Final EIR serves as adequate and appropriate environmental documentation for the Project. The City Council certifies that the Final EIR prepared for the Project is complete, and that it has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and CEQA Guidelines. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6t.h day of February , 2012. Mayor REVIE APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City A in st tor Attor�'ie i Y ;��'v' i�!b_ i Z IITIA D AND OVED:N Director of Planning and Building 12-3168/74987 3 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-05 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-05 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BEACH AND ELLIS . . ,-M,1-XED = USE - PROJECT Environmental Impact Report EIR No. 10-004 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Prepared for City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department 2000 Main Street, Third Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 Prepared by Atkins 12301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 430 Los Angeles, California 90025 February 2012 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-05 Affigattlon, Monitoring and Reporting Froaram INTRODUCTION The Final Environmental Impact Report for Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project (State Clearinghouse # 2011091022) identified mitigation measures to reduce the adverse effects of the project in the areas of: . aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and.water quality, noise, public services, transportation/traffic, utilities and service systems, and greenhouse gases. s The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that agencies adopting environmental impact reports ascertain .that 'feasible mitigation measures are implemented, subsequent to, project approval. Specifically, the lead or responsible;agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring program for mitigation measures incorporated into a project or imposed as conditions of approval. The program must be designed to ensure compliance during applicable project,timing, e.g. design, construction, or operation (Public Resource Code Section 21081.6);C6del,,Requirements (CRs) that were identified in the Draft EIR are required tobe implemented as a result of existing City code and are not considered mitigation measures: Therefore, CRs would be implemented for the Beach and Ellis Mixed-'Use Project but these do not require monitoring activity, and are not included in this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). i The MMRP shall be used by City of Huntington Beach staff responsible for ensuring compliance with mitigation measures associated with the Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project. Monitoring shall consist of review of appropriate documentation, such as plans or reports prepared, by the .party responsible for implementation or by field observation of the mitigation measure during implementation. The following table identifies the mitigation measures by resource area. The table also provides the specific mitigation monitoring requirements, including implementation documentation, monitoring activity, timing and responsible monitoring party. Verification of compliance with each measure is to be indicated by signature of the mitigation monitor, together with date of verification. The Project Applicant and the Applicant's Contractor shall be responsible for implementation of all mitigation measures,unless otherwise noted in the table. City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR Miti o e • • o s o • -e• a q9raryi - Mitig atio n.Monitoring qpd eporting Prognarn, _; . . Compliance- implementation =;_ r, Responsible, VermcdHon Mitigations Measure Documentation `.Monitorin"Activity Timing Mon#or signature :Date ON"I f7 a$`.t ..��'� _ m 3..� "mb e s».N. ..o#' i sy BECSP MM4.1.2 Proposed new structures shall be designed to maximize Building plans Review and. Plan check prior to Planning the use of non-reflective facade treatments, such as matte paint or glass approve building issuance of coatings. Prior to issuance of building permits for the proposed project,the plans for inclusion building permit Applicant shall indicate provision of these materials on the building plans. .'ma*<:�� a'e .�',. ,.•:»' : ` :..s. " �v'".ui3` `�� s" ,+�d�4. a.'LY fin 'd BECSP MM4.2-1 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that all diesel-powered equipment used will be retrofitted with after- notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a. treatment products(e.g.,engine catalysts).Contract specifications shall be specifications and grading permit included in project construction documents,which shall be reviewed by the grading plans for City of Huntington Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. inclusion BECSP MM4.2-2 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that all heavy-duty diesel-powered equipment operating and refueling at notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a the project site use low-NOx diesel fuel to the extent that it is readily specifications and grading permit available and cost effective(up to 125 percent of the cost of California Air grading plans for Resources Board diesel)in the South Coast Air Basin (this does not apply inclusion 6 to diesel-powered trucks traveling to and from the project site). Contract �~ specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which Y shall be reviewed by the City of Huntington Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. BECSP MM4.2-3 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning ° that construction equipment engines be maintained in good condition and notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a 0 in proper tune per manufacturer's specification for the duration of specifications and grading permit construction. Contract specifications shall be included in project grading plans for o construction documents,which shall be reviewed by the City of Huntington inclusion o Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. N i BECSP MM4.2-4 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that construction operations rely on the electricity infrastructure notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a surrounding the construction site rather than electrical generators powered specifications and . grading permit by internal combustion engines.Contract specifications shall be included in grading plans for project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of inclusion Huntington Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. 2 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 'Mitile at o Monitoring • • - •o o •o e MitigatfonMonitoring • • Reporting Program �. , Compliance. _ Implementafion Responsible .Ve►ncafion Mitigation Measure Documentation:: . ".MonitoringActivily,= Tuning.. Monitor Signature Date BECSP MM4.2-5 As required by South Coast Air Quality Management Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning District Rule 403—Fugitive Dust,all construction activities that are capable, notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a of generating fugitive dust are required to implement dust control measures specifications and grading permit during each phase of project development to reduce the amount of grading plans for particulate matter entrained,in the ambient air.These measures include the inclusion following: ■ Application of soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas ■ Quick replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas ■ Watering of exposed surfaces three times daily ■ Watering of all unpaved haul roads three times daily ■ Covering all stock piles with tarp n Reduction of vehicle speed on unpaved roads - - n Post signs on-site limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less �y ■ Sweep streets adjacent to the project site at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent roads �* ■ Cover or have water applied to the exposed surface of all trucks hauling dirt,sand,soil,or other loose materials prior to leaving the site ' to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas 0 ■ Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads to wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip z 0 BECSP MM4.2-6 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning o that construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in and construction plans specifications and grading permit No use for more than 30 minutes. Diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles grading plans and with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds shall be construction plans turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes.Contract specifications for inclusion .shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 3 •e • • • • • • Reppirting Prbgra • • s • • • • • Reporting • • • -- - t Compliance. Implementation Responsible, Verification '. Mitigation Measure Documentation:=;r. '�MonitoringActioif Timing_ -Monftor ,. Signature Date BECSP MM4.2.7 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that construction parking be configured to minimize traffic interference notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a during`the construction period and, therefore, reduce idling of traffic. and construction plans specifications and grading permit Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project grading plans and construction documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington construction plans Beach. for inclusion BECSP MM4.2-8 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications- "Contract language and Review and Plan:check prior to Planning that temporary traffic controls are provided_, such as a flag person, during notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a all phases of construction to facilitate smooth traffic flow. Contract and construction plans specifications and grading permit specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction grading plans and documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. construction plans for inclusion _ BECSP MM4.2-9 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning :. -- that construction activities:that:would affect traffic flow on-the-arterial notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a system be scheduled to off-peak hours (10:00 aM to 4:00 PM). Contract and construction plans specifications and grading permit specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction grading plans and r - documents,'which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. construction plans R' for inclusion BECSP MM4.2.10 Project applicants shall require by contract Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning specifications.that dedicated on-site and off-site left-turn lanes on truck notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a hauling routes be utilized for movement of construction trucks and and construction plans specifications and grading permitCD equipment on site and off site to the extent feasible during construction grading plans and o activities. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction plans construction documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington for inclusion Beach. Z 0 N O N O c.n 4 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 'VAINgOtlion,Whitorflig • e Reporting Program Mitigation Monitoring • • Reporting Program Compliance- Implementation w. _ Responsible, Venr►cadion ..,. Mitigation Measure �, Document A`. _ o`nitddh4Activily Timing Monitor°: Signature Date BECSP- MM4.2-11 Upon issuance of-building or grading permits, Mail to owners and Obtain confirmation Plan check prior to Planning _whichever is issued earlier, notification shall be mailed to.owners.and. . occupants within 300 that mailing to issuance of a occupants of all developed land uses within 300 feet of a project site within feet of project site a owners and grading or building the Specific Plan providing a schedule for major construction activities that notice regarding major occupants took permits,which will occur through the duration of the construction period. In addition, the construction activities place occur earlier notification_ will include the identification and contact number for, a . community liaison and designated.construction manager that would be available on site to monitor construction activities. The construction manager shall be responsible for complying with all project requirements related to PM10 generation.The construction manager will be located at the on-site construction office during construction hours for the duration of all construction activities. Contract information for the community liaison and construction manager will be located at the construction office, City Hall, the police department,and a sign on site. BECSP MM4.2.12 Project applicants shall require by contract Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning specifications that the architectural coating (paint and primer) products notes on construction approve contract issuance of a used would have a VOC rating of 125 grams per liter or less. Contract plans specifications and building permit specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction construction plans Cr documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of for inclusion Huntington Beach. Y BECSP MM4.2-13 Project applicants shall require by contract Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning specifications that materials that do not require painting be used during notes on construction approve contract issuance of a o construction to the extent feasible.Contract specifications shall be included plans specifications'and building permit in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed construction plans o and approved by the City of Huntington Beach. for inclusion z BECSP MM4.2-14 Project applicants shall require by contract Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning N specifications that pre-painted construction materials be used to the extent notes on construction approve contract issuance of a feasible. Contract.specifications shall be.included in the.proposed project. plans -.. -- . . specifications and building permit construction documents,which shall be reviewed and approved by the City construction plans of Huntington Beach. for inclusion City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 5 Mitig9tion Monitoringgind Reporting qqgrarin Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program! Cor►ipfiance lmplementgfion" Responsible, Verfcafion Mitigation Measure Documentation;, ' Mon#6 g'Activity ;:Tiriiwg ."monlix Signature Date Project MM4.2-15 ..Project -applicants -shall -require - by contract Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning specifications that all paving be completed as soon as possible to reduce_ notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a fugitive dust emissions. and construction plans specifications and grading permit grading plans and - construction plans for inclusion 'r015 am. i. c= Ear"'` `a, aw r% .. . <„ 4. BI«L ,GIC,aL'RE CE$ _ .: ny ,' a ;. ' -.a: r- a"' .., � BECSP MM4.3.1 Nesting avian species protected by the MBTA: Developer shall submit Review grading, Plan check prior to Planning a. Prior to any construction or vegetation removal between February 15 construction schedule plans for inclusion issuance of a and August 31,a nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified (including grading grading permit biologist of all habitats within 250 feet of the construction area. activities)as evidence _ of construction overlap Surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days prior to commencement of construction activities and surveys with breeding season. will be conducted in accordance with CDFG protocol as applicable.If If construction occurs Review field survey, During Planning no active nests are identified on or within 250 feet of the construction during relevant if necessary construction site,no further mitigation is necessary.A copy of the pre-construction breeding,developer survey shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach.If an active shall present a survey As necessary a' nest of a MBTA protected species is identified on site(per established report(prepared by a pursuant to field thresholds)a 100-foot no-work buffer shall be maintained between the consultant approved survey,review and Y nest and construction activity.This buffer can be reduced in by the City)to the City approve consultation with CDFG and/or USFWS.Completion of the nesting prior to issuance of a recommendations C cycle shall be determined by qualified ornithologist or biologist. grading permit.If and any other o b. Completion of the nesting cycle shall be determined by qualified nests are found, relevant document o ornithologist or biologist. developer shall submit per this mitigation plans identifying nest o locations and limits of N construction activities.. N , O 6 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR Mitigation • • • • • ReportirIg Program Mitigation • e • • •, Reporting Program Compronce- Implementation _ Responsible; r VerificaHon z z,x,:;�,•.� MitigaFion Measure Documentafiorr6 Monitodng,Acti*, -_77rriing. Monitor�_`� Signature Date URAU_RESOURCE$ :. _.. �• _�.� � � '� , .",.&,•��":a;�i,�.�� a.: ��.' ��.. u.�; rk��, r�wr M�.� ter° s �� w" ; =� :a�°a�? ,���7, 4z go-' �, BECSP MM4.4-1 Prior to development activities-that would demolish or Proof of retention of Verify retention of Plan check prior to Planning otherwise physically affect buildings or structures 45 years old or older or an historical resource qualified historical issuance of affect their historic setting, the project applicant shall retain a cultural professional to resource demolition or resource professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior's determine potential professional grading permit, Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History to determine significance of whichever occurs if the project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance structure 45 years old earlier of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the CEQA or older Guidelines. The investigation shall include, as determined appropriate by the cultural resource professional and the City of Huntington Beach, the Preparation of a Review and appropriate archival research, including, if necessary, an updated records technical report or approve technical search of the•South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the memorandum report or California Historical Resources Information System and a pedestrian documenting the result memorandum. survey of the proposed development area to determine if any significant of historical resources historic-period' resources would be-adversely`affected by"the proposed If determined development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a investigation. necessary,verify x technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any historical that project �.. resources within the development area and includes recommendations and applicant has Cr methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources. The implemented technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City of methods identified Y Huntington Beach for approval. As determined necessary by the City, in the technical environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for report or future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the memorandum for o findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. reducing impacts on . The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for historical resources 0 eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources identified in the z technical report or memorandum. N O N O City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 7 mitigatiqh monif6ring and'Reporting •• e Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting'Program �Compliance " a►rnplementauon Re"sponsibie �46ift6tion Mitigation Measure Documeritufion_,--,d MonitoringActivity Urn ing. Monitor . -Signature :Date BECSP MM4.4-2(b) If evidence of an archaeological-site-or other Proof of retention of Verify retention of Throughout Planning suspected .historical .-resource- as defined- by CEQA Guidelines- archaeological qualified ground disturbing Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past-human activity professional to . archaeological activities ("midden"), that could conceal material remains (e.g., worked stone, fired determine if a professional,if clay vessels,faunal bone, hearths,storage pits,or burials)are discovered substantial adverse necessary,and during any project-related earth-disturbing activities(including projects that change would occur to complete would not encounter undisturbed soils), all earth-disturbing activity within an archaeological documentation 100 feet of the find shall be halted and the City of Huntington-Beach-shall resource be notified. The-project applicant shall retain an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for Archaeology to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall. be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through data'recovery or other methods determined adequate by the archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards-for Archaeological Documentation. Any identified cultural resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-L) form and filed with the appropriate Information Center. BECSP MM4.4-3(b)Should paleontological resources(i.e.,fossil remains) Proof of retention of Verify retention of Throughout Planning be identified at a particular site during project construction,the construction paleontological qualified ground disturbing foreman shall cease construction within 100 feet of the find until a qualified professional to paleontological activities professional can provide an evaluation.Mitigation of resource impacts shall determine if a professional,if be implemented and funded by the project applicant and shall be substantial adverse necessary conducted as follows: change would occur to 0 1. Identify and evaluate paleontological resources by intense field survey an paleontological o• where impacts are considered high resource Z 2. Assess effects on identified sites ° N 3. Consult with the institutional/academic paleontologists conducting research investigations within the geological formations that are slated No to be impacted 4. Obtain comments from the researchers 5. Comply with researchers'recommendations to address any significant adverse effects where_determined by the City to be feasible In considering any suggested mitigation proposed by the consulting —paleontologist,the City of Huntington Beach staff shall determine whether 8 _ City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR - - Mitiqption Monitoring arfd Reporting Progirwil Mitir• • aMonitoring • • R"!eporting Program .' Compliance 4. Implementation - .. Responsible` Veffcafion Mitigation Measure "µ Documentafion -. Monitoring Acliviiy ^Timing. . - --.. -Monitor Signature Date avoidance is necessary and feasible in light of factors such as the nature ofthe find, project design, costs, applicable policies and land use -assumptions, and other considerations: If avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) shall be instituted. Work,.may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources is carried out. wZN- - �a . " BECSP MM4.5-1 Future development in the Beach Boulevard and Edinger Soils and geotechnical Review and Plan check prior to Public Works Avenue Corridors Specific Plan area shall prepare a'grading plan to analysis and notes on approve grading issuance of a Building and contain the recommendations of the final soils and geotechnical report. grading plan and and building plans grading permit Safety These recommendations shall be implemented in the design of the project, building plans for inclusion of final. including but not limited to measures associated with site preparation, fill soils and placement, temporary shoring and permanent dewatering, groundwater-. geotechnical seismic design_ features,excavation stability,foundations, soil stabilization, recommendations establishment of deep foundations,concrete slabs and pavements,surface drainage, cement type and corrosion measures, erosion control, shoring k -and internal bracing,and plan review. Y C 0 o' z 0 N O r N O City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 9 Mitigation • • e e nd -•• e •• • Mitigation • e • e • Reporting Program .. .Compliance �Impler►ientation"� �� ...` . Responsible VenTication '. Mitigation Measure Documentation:1 -Montoring Activity Timing Monitor Signahne ;Date � BECSP MM4.6-1 Prior_to the issuance of grading permits-on any project Preparation of Review technical Plan check prior to Fire site,the site developers)shall: technical documentations, issuance of ■. Investigate the project site to determine whether it or immediately documentation to and,as necessary, demolition or adjacent areas have a record of hazardous material contamination via address site specific review and approve grading permits, - the preparation of a preliminary environmental site assessment(ESA), hazards;Risk closure reports whichever occurs which shall be submitted to the City for review.If contamination is Management Plan and earlier found the report shall characterize the site according to the nature and Site Health and Safety extent of contamination that is present before development activities Plan precede at that site. ■ If contamination is determined to be on site,the City,in accordance with appropriate regulatory agencies,shall determine the need for further investigation and/or remediation of the soils conditions on the contaminated site. If further investigation or remediation is required,it shall be the responsibility of the site developer(s)to complete such ry investigation and/or remediation prior to construction of the project. ■ If remediation is required as identified by the local oversight agency,it shall be accomplished in a manner that reduces risk to below y applicable standards and shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy permits.Approval of a Human Health Risk Assessment performed by the project proponent may be required to ensure o occupancy could occur safely. ■ Closure reports or other reports acceptable to the Huntington Beach Fire Department that document the successful completion of required Z 0 remediation activities,or an approved active on site remediation system that has been approved by Orange County Environmental Health Care Agency,for contaminated soils,in accordance with City Specification 431-92,.shall be submitted and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to the issuance of grading permits for site development.No construction shall occur in the affected area until reports have been accepted by the City. 10 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use-Project EIR •• • • • • • e -•e • e• • Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Compliance Implementation Responsible 'Verification x MHigaHonMeasure Documentation Monttoring�Activity'r Timing. Moriiior Signature Date BECSP MM4.6-2 In the event that previously unknown or unidentified soil Risk Management Review and Plan check prior to Fire and/or_groundwater contamination that could present a threat to human Plan approve any issuance of any health or the environment is encountered during construction of the and grading plans for grading permit and proposed project, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the Site Health and Safety inclusion during contamination shall cease immediately. If contamination is encountered, a Plan construction Risk Management _Plan shall -be prepared and implemented that (1).identifies the contaminants of concern and the potential. risk._each .. contaminant would pose to human health and the environment'during - construction- and.post-development and (2)describes measures to be taken to protect workers, and the public from exposure to potential site hazards. Such measures could include a range of options, including, but not limited to, physical site controls during construction, remediation, long- term monitoring, post-development maintenance or access limitations, or some combination thereof. Depending on the nature of contamination, if any,.appropriate agencies shall be notified (e.g., City of Huntington Beach Fire Department). If needed, a Site Health and Safety Plan that meets Occupational .Safety and Health Administration requirements shall be . prepared and in place prior to commencement of work in any contaminated area. BECSP MM4.6-3 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, future Methane Testing Plan Review and Prior to Fire y development in the Specific Plan shall comply with HBFD City approval of testing commencement of Specification No. 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. A plan sampling plan for the testing of soils for the presence of methane gas shall be CD prepared and submitted by the Applicant to the HBFD for review and Notes on building and Review and Prior to issuance Fire methane plans approve building of any grading approval, prior to the commencement of sampling. If significant levels of o' methane gas are discovered in the soil on the future development project and methane gas permit and during site, the Applicant's grading, building and methane plans shall reference plans for construction z 0 that a sub-slab methane barrier and vent system will be installed at the appropriate o project site per City Specification No. 429, prior to plan. approval. If documentation N required by the HBFD, additional methane mitigation measures to reduce o the level of methane gas to acceptable levels shall be implemented. City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR e o • e • • o o - o e a e e e ' • • • • s • • • - • e • o • • V en :on � Responsible Ven7ication MRi anon Measure. _ =Documentation; 'Monifori►i i4ctiv Tim►n Monitor Si nature Date 9 9 ►h! ,r 9:r J BECSP MM4.6-4 To ensure adequate access for emergency-vehicles_-,Prepare construction Plan check prior to Prior to approval Fire,Police when construction activities would result in temporary lane or.roadway roadway plans grading or building of grading or closures, the developer shall consult with the'City of Huntington Beach permits,whichever building permits, Police and Fire Departments.to disclose temporary lane or roadway occurs earlier whichever occurs closures and alternative travel routes. The developer shall be required to earlier - keep q minimum.of_one lane,in.each direction free from encumbrances at all times on perimeter.streets accessing the project site.At any time`only a - single lane is available, the developer shall provide a temporary traffic -- signal,signal carriers(i.e.,flagpersons),or other appropriate traffic controls to allow travel in both directions. .If construction activities require the complete closure of a roadway segment, the developer shall coordinate with the City of Huntington Beach Police,and Fire Departments to designate proper detour routes and signage indicating alternative routes. 5 v� BECSP MM4.7-1 City of Huntington Beach shall require Applicants for new Water Quality Review and Prior to receiving a Public Works development and significant redevelopment projects within the Specific Management Plan approve WQMP precise grading rn Plan area, including the proposed project, to prepare a project Water permit Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with the DAMP requirements and measures described below and with all current adopted y permits. The WQMP shall be prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer and submitted for review and acceptance prior to issuance of a Precise `°Grading or Building permit. 0 BMPs in.the WQMP shall be designed in accordance with the Municipal NPDES Permit, Model WQMP, Technical Guidance Documents, DAMP, and City of-Huntington Beach LIP. As noted in the Specific Plan, all o development projects shall include site design and source control BMPs in the project .WQMP. Additionally, new development br significant N 0 redevelopment projects and priority projects shall include LID principles to 0 reduce.runoff-to a level.consistent with the maximum extent practicable and treatment control BMPs in the WQMP. If permanent dewatering is required and allowed by the City,the developer shall submit an application to RWQCB and follow the procedures as stated in Order No R8-2009-0003.The Applicant shall include a description of the dewatering technique, discharge location, discharge quantities, chemical characteristics of discharged water,operations and maintenance plan, and 12 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR •s • • o o • e -•• • Prodram Mitigotion,Monitoring • • Reporting, PrograM Compfiance - _ Implementation' _.._ Responsible Verfication MiHgallonMeasure .rx <.:.'_ _" Documeritation : MonitoringActivily Timing Monitor"'° ;Signature Date WDID number for proof of coverage under the De Minimis.Threat General Permit or.copy.of the,individual WDR in the WQMP. Additionally, the WQMP shall incorporate any additional BMPs as required by the City Public Works Department. The WQMP shall include the following additional requirements: Project and Site Characterization Requirements ■- Entitlement Application numbers and site address shall be.included on the title sheet of the WQMP ■ " In the project description section,explain whether proposed use includes.on-site food preparation,eating areas(if not please state), outdoor activities to be expected,vehicle maintenance,service, washing cleaning(if prohibited on site,please state) All potential"pollutants of concern for the proposed project land use type as per Table 7.11-1 of the Orange County Model Water Quality Management Plan shall be identified ■ A narrative describing how all potential pollutants of concern will be addressed through the implementation of BMPs and describing how site design BMP concepts will be considered and incorporated into the project design shall be included CD 'C ■ Existing soil types and estimated percentages of perviousness for o existing and proposed conditions shall be identified o. ■ In Section I of the WQMP,state verbatim the Development Requirements from the Planning Department's letter to the Applicant o ■ A site plan showing the location of the selected treatment control BMPs and drainage areas shall be included in the WQMP N _ o ■_ A Geotechnical Report shall-be submitted to address site conditions for determination of infiltration limitations and other pertinent characteristics. Project-Based Treatment Control BMPs ■ Infiltration-type BMPs shall not be used unless the Geotechnical Report states otherwise.Depth to seasonal high groundwater is City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 13 AM 0 0 •• o • o • - o• o o s o O O O O O • O • O • • O • O '-,f' Compliance ` x ►mplementahon q g*Responsible .Verification tttQ, Mingation`Measure '; �� �• , '�,. Docu#m tation^�~ ring Activity Tming. � �x,M Signature Dat., en Monrto i onitor, e _ determined to provide at"least"a-10-foot.clearance between the bottom of the.BMP and top of the water table. ■ Wet swales and grassed channels shall not be used because of the slow infiltration rates of project site soils,the potentially shallow depth to groundwater,and water conservation needs ® .If-proprietary Structural Treatment Control devices are used,they shall be.sited and"designed in-compliance with the manufacturers design criteria . ■ Surface exposed treatment control BMPs shall be selected such that standing water drains or evaporates within 24 hours or as required by the County's vector control . ■ Excess stormwater runoff shall bypass the treatment control BMPs " unless they are designed to handle the flow rate or volume from;a-100 ' year storm event without reducing"effectiveness:Effectiveness of any treatment control BMP for removing the pollutants of concern shall be m" documented via analytical models or existing studies on effectiveness. ■ . The project WQMP shall incorporate water efficient landscaping using . drought tolerant,native plants in accordance with Landscape and y Irrigation Plans as set"forth by the Applicant(see below) ■ Pet waste stations(stations that provide waste pick up bags and a convenient.disposal container protected from precipitation)shall be o provided and.maintained o ■ . Building materials shall minimize exposure of bare metals to z stormwater.Copper or Zinc roofing materials,including downspouts, shall be prohibited.Bare metal surfaces shall be painted with non-lead- CD containing paint _" o The following-BMPs shall'not-be used because they have not been shown to be effective in many situations. Therefore, unless.sufficient objective" studies and review are available and supplied"with the WQMP to correctly" size devices and to,document expected pollutant removal rates the WQMP shall not include: " 14 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR - " ' •m e • m e e • -oo 0 0• e MiI a • • • 0 O • • 0 0 O • • O Y lmplementafion, � ;Responsible r Ve►►ficat�on u . =rm►n y Mingat(or►Measure, �°., Kph ...�% � � .Documeniahona�: Mon►tonng Achyily m" g.� - ��Moniior .; �,;_ Sign Hydrodynamic separator type devices as a BMP for removing any pollutant except trash and gross particulates ® Oil and Grit separators Any Applicant proposing development in the Specific Plan Area is encouraged to consider the following BMPs: Sand filters or other filters(including media filters)for rooftop runoff ®- Dry swales.A dry swale treatment system could be used if sufficient area,slope gradient,and length of swale could be incorporated into: the project design.Dry swales could remove substantial amounts of nutrients,suspended solids,metals,and petroleum hydrocarbons ® Other proprietary treatment devices(if supporting documentation is provided) Nonstructural BMPs The WOMP shall include the following operations and maintenance BMPs under the management of an applicant or property manager, where applicable. The Applicant shall fund and implement an operational and maintenance program that includes the following: ® The Applicant shall dictate minimum landscape maintenance . standards and tree trimming requirements.for the total project site. . Landscape maintenance shall be performed by a qualified landscape maintenance company or individual in accordance with a Chemical o. Management Plan detailing chemical application.methods,chemical handling procedures,and worker training. Pesticide application shall, o be performed by a certified applicator.No chemicals shall be stored oN on-site unless in a covered and contained area.and in accordance with an approved Materials Management Plan.Application rates shall not o ezceed"labeled rates for pesticides,and shall not exceed soil test rates for nutrients.Slow release fertilizers shall be used to prevent excessive nutrients in stormwater or irrigation runoff. ® The Applicant or property manager shall have the power and duty to , establish,oversee,guide,and require proper maintenance and tree. trimming procedures per the ANSI A-300 Standards as established b City of Huntington Beach,Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project FIR 15 0 o e • o o a o -e o o •• o • • • • •dIng • • Reporfing • O • 44, -• ;n-. .,a.y '. >- s M1 y"* ' z,- 'rj s>e x�= '` ', COmpllance v Implementation s Responsible � Venficaton 41 � .r Mingatior►Measure .a Documentation:F MonitoringAcfrvrly. Timing y Monifor °Signature v Date n' y, the International Society of Arborist.The Applicant or property . manager shall require that all trees be trimmed by or under the direct observation/direction of a licensed/certified Arborist for the entire area. The Applicant shall establish minimum standards for maintenance for the total community,and establish enforcement thereof for the total community.The property manager shall rectify problems arising from incorrect tree trimming,-chemical applications;and other maintenance - within.the total community.- ■ Landscape irrigation shall be performed in accordance with an Irrigation Management Plan to minimize excess irrigation contributing to dry-and wet-weather runoff.Automated sprinklers shall be used and be inspected at least quarterly and adjusted yearly to minimize: potential excess irrigation flows.Landscape irrigation maintenance shall be performed in accordance with the approved irrigation plans, the City Water Ordinance and per the City Arboricultural and . Landscape Standards and Specifications.. a Proprietary stormwater treatment systems maintenance shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.If a nonproprietary treatment system is used,maintenance shall be in accordance with standard practices as identified in the current CASOA (2003)handbooks,operations and maintenance procedures outlined in the approved WQMP,City BMP guidelines,or other City-accepted guidance. o a Signage,enforcement of pet waste controls,and public education o would improve use and compliance,and therefore,effectiveness of the program,and reduce.the potential for hazardous materials and other o pollution in stormwater runoff.The Applicant shall prepare and install o appropriate signage,disseminate information to residents.and retail businesses,and include pet waste controls,(e.g.,requirements for pet o waste-cleanup,pet activity area restrictions,pet waste disposal ' restrictions)in the any agreement,tenant lease(regarding rental property)or Conditions,Covenants,and Restrictions(regarding for-- sale property). ® Street sweeping shall be.performed at an adequate frequency to prevent build up of pollutants see 16- Qity of Huntingt_on_B_each,_Bedch_and_Ellis Mixed-Use-Project EIR •o • -Monitoring'o • Reporting Program Mitigation • s • s • Reporting Program Compliance u... Implementation Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation.;.,F; .NlonfioringAcfi�ily. Timing. . Mon�or . "-Signature 'Date http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/uItraurb/uubmp3p7.htm/for street sweeping effectiveness). n The Applicant shall develop a maintenance plan for BMPs and facilities identifying responsible parties and maintenance schedules and appropriate BMPs to minimize discharges of contaminants to storm drain systems during maintenance operations. " Reporting requirements:the Applicant or property manager shall prepare an annual report and submit-the annual report to the City of Huntington Beach documenting the BMPs operations and maintenance conducted that year.The annual report shall also address the.potential system deficiencies and corrective actions taken or planned. Site Design BMPs Any Applicant proposing development in the Specific Plan Area is required to incorporate LID principles as defined in the Municipal NPDES Permit m and is encouraged to consider the following BMPs, if allowed in accordance with the Geotechnical Report and limitations on infiltration BMPs: Y ■ Use of porous concrete or asphalt(if acceptable to the Geotechnical Engineer and where infiltration will not adversely affect groundwater) or other pervious pavement for driveways,paths,sidewalks,and o. courtyards/open space areas,to the maximum extent practicable, would reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff as well as provide some detention within the material void'space. If porous paver blocks are z used,they shall be adequately maintained to provide continued ° porosity(effectiveness) o ■ Incorporation of rain gardens or cisterns to reuse runoff for landscape o irrigation `^ ■ Green roofs to reduce runoff and treat roof pollutants ® Site design and landscape planning to group water use requirements for efficient irrigation 'Void space is the empty space between individual particles. City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR _ 17 —-- - e efibn Me e o 0 0 -o o a o o e e • o h t Mohlt'001e o nd Repodihgl Frow,o ----- ;,� Compliance ....,xa Implementafion, ., > - .., axsts. ?, p en1icahon .. c' Res onsible 1/ `. M►hgation Measured � ;" Documentat►on Ailonitoring Activity 1im►ng q M646r, Sigriahire Date.., BECSP MM4.7-2 The City-of Huntington Beach shall require that any Groundwater Review and Prior to issuance Public Works Applicant prepare a Groundwater Hydrology Study to determine the lateral Hydrology Study approve of a precise transmissivity of area soils and a safe pumping yield such that dewatering Groundwater grading permit - activities do not interfere with nearby water supplies. The Groundwater Hydrology Study Hydrology Study shall make recommendations on-whether permanent groundwater dewatering is feasible within the constraints of a safe pumping level. The Applicant's engineer of record shall incorporate the Hydrology Study designs and recommendations into project plans. If groundwater dewatering is determined allowable by-the City,-the Applicant - shall submit an application to the RWQCB for dewatering purposes, per the De Minimis Permit Number R8-2009-0003. If safe groundwater dewatering is determined to not be feasible, permanent groundwater - - - dewatering shall not be implemented. The City Director of Public Works, OCWD, and other regulatory agencies shall approve or disapprove any permanent groundwater dewatering based on the Groundwater Hydrology Study and qualified Engineers'recommendations. F CD 7D 0 o z 0 N O_ N O 18 _ _ City_of Huntington Beach-Beach_and_Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR •atipirms s e • a - s o o e s -_ o m - s o 0 o a o• • • • • • �,� �`� '_ •. x., �" � Compliance,.";�� - - ImplementafionRe ponsiblemVenficption w' Mitigation Measure Documentations°:MonitoriiigyActivity ,Timing Monitor Signature Dater BECSP MM4.7-3 The City of Huntington Beach shall require that the Hydrology and Review and Prior to issuance Public Works _ Applicant's Licensed Civil Engineer for each site-specific development Hydraulics Study approve study of a precise prepare a Hydrology and Hydraulic Study to identify the effects of potential grading permit stormwater runoff from the specific development on the existing storm drain flows for the 10-, 25-, and 100-year design storm events. The precise final grading Inspect project site; Following grading, Public Works drainage improvements shall be designed and constructed as required by and street verify that drainage excavation,and the Department of Public Works to mitigate impact of increased runoff due improvement plans is in accordance installation of to development,or deficient,downstream systems. Design of all necessary and studies with approved plans utilities drainage improvements shall provide mitigation for all rainfall event and that required frequencies up to a 100-year frequency The Applicant shall design site detention/storm drainage and document that the proposed development would not increase drain system peak storm event flows over pre-1986 Qs, which must be established by improvements have the hydrology study. If the analyses shows that the City's current drainage been implemented. system cannot meet the volume needs of the project runoff, the applicant - shall be required to attenuate site runoff to an amount not to exceed the 25-year storm as determined using pre-1986 criteria. As an option, the - applicant may choose to explore low-flow design alternatives, downstream attenuation or detention, or upgrade the-City's stormwater system to accommodate the impacts of the new development, at no cost to the City. The Hydrology and Hydraulic Study shall also incorporate all current adopted Municipal NPDES Permit and City requirements for stormwater flow calculations and retention/detention features in effect at the time of ' review. 0 BECSP MM4.7-4 The City of Huntington Beach shall require that adequate Hydrology and Review and Prior to issuance Public Works capacity in the storm drain system is demonstrated from the specific Hydraulics Study approve study of a precise 0' development site discharge location to the nearest main channel to grading permit Z accommodate discharges from the specific development. If capacity is ° demonstrated as adequate, no upgrades will be required. If capacity is not o adequate, the City of Huntington Beach shall identify corrective action(s) N required by the specific development Applicant to ensure adequate Y -b capacity.Corrective action could include,but is not limited to: = - ® Construction of new storm drains,as identified in the MPD or based on the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study,if the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study identifies greater impacts than the MPD City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 19 •e o o e e o o -o o a o o e MM o • s • • • • • - e • o Fr• • •tin ,:. ? Compliance ImplementationW # Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure w :. .. d Dumentation ,r, Monitoring Activity` , Timing xxMoniior Signature Date ® Improvement of existing storm drains,as identified in the MPD or - based on the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study,if the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study identifies greater impacts than the MPD ® In-lieu feesvto implement systemwide storm.drain infrastructure improvements m:- Other mechanisms as determined by the City Department of Public -Works e For nonresidential areas,if redevelopment would result in an impervious fraction of less than 0.9 and does not increase the directly connected impervious area compared to existing conditions,runoff is - expected.to remain the same or less than as assessed in the MPD and only MPD improvements would be required Because='some -storm drain system constraints may be located far downgradient from the actual development site, several properties may serve to contribute to system capacity constraints. Therefore, the City Department of Public Works shall assess each site development and system characteristics to identify the best method for achieving adequate capacity in the storm drain system. Drainage assessment fees/districts to y improve/implement storm drains at downstream locations or where contributing areas are large are enforced through Municipal Code (Section 14.20). CD 0 The City Department of Public Works shall review the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study and determine required corrective action(s) or if a waiver of corrective action is applicable. The site-specific development Applicant o shall incorporate required corrective actions into their project design and/or N plan. Prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy or final inspection, the o City Department of Public Works shall ensure that required corrective o action has been implemented. At 8. AW None — — — — — — 20 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR .,itAlfi19atioh Monitoring e • -•• • •e • Mitigation • • - • • • Pro gram v ; Compliance Implementation Responsible Vemcation � s • - _ - MitigaiionMeasure Documentation'' MonitoringAcfivity � Tirriing Monitor Signature Date R�­ '4 �. �f§ �'<: b ., ve�, ca.,,.e„ '"ram.-astir' Ta. °,`• .a: `a'4 BECSP MlVl4.9-1 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that the following construction best management practices (BMPs) be notes on grading and approve contract issuance of a implemented by contractors to reduce construction noise levels: building plans specifications, grading permit ■ Two weeks prior to the commencement of construction,notification grading and building must'be provided to surrounding land uses within 300 feet of.a project plans for inclusion site disclosing the construction schedule,including the various types of activities that would be occurring throughout the duration of the Periodic field check During Planning construction period construction ® Ensure that construction equipment is properly muffled according to - industry standards and be in good working condition ® Place noise-generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses,where feasible ® Schedule high-noise-producing activities between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM to minimize disruption on sensitive uses,Monday through Saturday;schedule pile-driving activities between the hours of 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM on Mondays through Fridays only Y ■ Implement noise attenuation measures,which may include,but are not limited to,temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationary CD construction noise sources 0 ® Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel ~• 0 equipment,where feasible z ■ Construction-related equipment,including heavy-duty equipment, ° motor vehicles,and portable equipment,shall be turned off when not in o use for more than 10 minutes N 0 Construction hours,allowable workdays,and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job superintendent;if the City or the job superintendent receives a complaint,the superintendent shall investigate,take appropriate corrective action,and report the action taken to the reporting party Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 21 e a e o e e o • - s e a e• e Mit!4,dfibbi Monif• 0 • • ReIk O 0 • • • O , ,. Impt eihentahon �' �:�'. Responsible Ven icahon MiFigationMeasure >r 6o6mentation:.:.us MoriiForingAcfivtlj' Timing :Monitor Signature- Date construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. BECSP MM4.9-2 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Prior to issuance Planning that construction staging areas along with the operation of earthmoving notes on grading plans approve grading of a grading permit equipment within the project area would be located as far away from and building plans plans and building vibration and noise sensitive sites as possible.Contract specifications shall plans for inclusion be included in the proposed projectconstruction documents,which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. BECSP MM4.9-3 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Prior to issuance Building and that heavily loaded trucks used during construction would be routed away notes on grading and approve grading of a grading permit Safety from residential streets. Contract specifications shall be included in the building plans and building plans proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the for inclusion City prior to issuance of a grading permit. BECSP MM4.9-4 Project applicants shall provide proper shielding for all Contract language and Review and Prior to issuance Planning new HVAC systems used by the proposed residential and mixed-use notes on building approve building of a building buildings to achieve a noise attenuation of 15 dBA at 50 feet from the plans plans for inclusion permit equipment. BECSP MM4.9-5 Prior to issuance of building permits, project applicants Acoustical Study Review and Prior to issuance Planning shall submit an acoustical study for each development, prepared by a approval of study of building permits certified acoustical engineer. Should the results of the acoustical study and building plans indicate that that exterior (e.g., patios and balconies) and interior noise for inclusion any levels would exceed the standards set forth in the City of Huntington Beach special design Municipal Code Sections 8.40.050 through 8.40.070, the project applicant measures �. shall include design measures that may include acoustical paneling or walls to ensure that noise levels do not exceed City standards. Final o project design shall incorporate special design measures in the construction of the residential units,if necessary. N UL TI o None — — — — — 22 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR •e o :Mqnitc�r,LA t3fid - e• s •• • MitigqtIon,MOfiitb.ring and ,Relpo.rting, o • • r M, 12 Implementation _ Respor►sible :Verific"anon A ign rti ahor►Mepsure >;,M'g ,' Documentation „„;Moriitoririg ctiyily tt:Timmg x µ;' Ma►►1or Sature _.�_am.t l�,t. ES _ �: BECSP MM4.11-1 Subject to the City's annual-budgetary process, which Budget sufficiently to Review at annual Prior to issuance Planning considers available funding and the staffing levels needed to provide maintain standard budgetary of building permits acceptable response time for fire and police services,the City shall provide level of fire and police discussions; Review sufficient funding to maintain the City's standard, average level of service protection currently standard through the use of General Fund monies. levels None — — — — — — 3 T fo BECSP MM4.13-1 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a separate westbound right turn lane to the intersection of occupancy Beach Boulevard at Warner Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans approval. BECSP MM4.13-2 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works 6' area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of dual northbound and southbound left turn lanes to the occupancy intersection of Beach Boulevard at Garfield Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans approval. 0 BECSP MM4.13-3 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a fourth northbound through lane to the intersection of occupancy z Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. ° N BECSP MM4.13-4 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of o addition of a separate northbound right turn lane to the intersection of occupancy Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. BECSP MM4.13-5 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a fourth southbound through lane to the intersection of occupancy Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 23 Mitigatioh Monitoring-and Reportin• P rogram Compliance Implementation tir n-_brim Responsible . ,Vedlicalion a �._ ;" AiliiigationMeasure _>' Documentafionz oniorinOjt Timing a`-Monitor . Signature Date BECSP MM4.13-6 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a fourth eastbound through lane to the intersection of occupancy Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. BECSP MM4.13-7 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition- of- a -fourth -westbound through lane to the intersection of occupancy. Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. BECSP MM4.13-8 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area,the project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution to allow a payment of certificate of right turn overlap for a westbound right turn at the intersection of occupancy Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. BECSP MM4.13.9 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share - Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area,the project applicant(s)shall make a fair share contribution to allow a payment of certificate of right turn overlap for a northbound right turn at the intersection of occupancy Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. BECSP MM4.13-10 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of y addition of a fourth northbound through lane to the intersection of Beach occupancy Boulevard at Edinger Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would CD require Caltrans approval. 0 BECSP MM4.13.11 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a third westbound through lane to the intersection of Beach occupancy o Boulevard at Edinger Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans approval. N BECSP MM4.13-12 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works o area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair-share contribution-for the payment-- - - of certificate of addition of a separate southbound right-turn lane to the intersection of occupancy Beach Boulevard at Bolsa Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans approval. 24 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR "Mitigation 0 • • • • Reporting,Program, Mitigation • • • • • Reporting-Program- Compliance Implementation Responsible. Verification 4;;r MrtigalionMeasure.' nt',f.: Documentation n, � Monto&4-Acm* -Umin4 onilor Signature Date BECSP MM4.13-13 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan -Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works _ area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a second westbound left-turn lane to the intersection of Beach occupancy Boulevard at Talbert Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans approval. BECSP MM4.13-14 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a de facto westbound right-turn lane to the intersection of Beach occupancy Boulevard at Talbert Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans approval. BECSP MM4.13-15 For future projects that occur within the Specific'Plan - Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of conversion of a separate westbound right-turn lane to a de facto right-turn occupancy lane at the intersection of Newland Street at.Warner Avenue. BECSP MM4.13-16 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a third westbound through lane to the intersection of Newland occupancy Cr Street at Warner Avenue. Y BECSP MM4.13-17 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a separate southbound right-turn lane to the intersection of occupancy o Beach Boulevard at McFadden Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans and City of Westminster approvals. o BECSP MM4.13-18 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works o area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of N addition of a separate northbound right-turn lane to the intersection of occupancy Beach Boulevard at McFadden Avenue. Implementation of this o -improvement would require Caltrans and City of Westminster approvals. City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 25 o s o o • o o a - o• o s o 0 Mifi•citfo onfforfhg s s 'Re'PQr#n'gjPpV• e .,;w` ',�� ���� _ � �'�r;, ��� ��,• � ,. w � �Compliarice r „* � Implementation G Responsible Ver►cation ' :._ `° Mfigafion AAeasure:a -a „ ;v.4 Documentation t :,MJ nitoringAcfrvrly Timing AAonitor, Signaiuie' Dcrie a FM BECSP MM4.14-1 The components of future projects in the Specific Plan Notes on construction Review construction Prior to issuance Public Works area shall incorporate the following measures to ensure that conservation plans and conditions, plans prior to of building permits; and efficient water use practices are implemented per project. Project covenants and issuance of building Prior to final proponents,as applicable,shall: restrictions(CC&Rs), permits;Review inspection -® Require employees to,report leaks and water losses immediately and as applicable CC&Rs prior to final shall provide information and training as required to allow for efficient inspection reporting and follow up ® Educate employees about the importance and benefits of water conservation e Create water conservation suggestion boxes,and place them in prominent areas,.- ® Install signs in restrooms and cafeterias that encourage water conservation �y ■ Assign an employee to evaluate water conservation opportunities and effectiveness ® Develop and implement a water management plan for its facilities that includes methods for reducing overall water use ' o Conduct a water use survey to update current water use needs o (processes and equipment are constantly upgrading,thus changing the need for water in some areas) ® Repair leaks;check the water supply system for leaks and turn off o unnecessary flows 0 s Utilize water-efficient irrigation systems and drought tolerant plant N - palette and insure1hat sprinklers are directing water to landscape areas,and not to parking lots,sidewalks or other paved areas ■ Adjust the irrigation schedule for seasonal changes ® Install low-flow or waterless fixtures in public and employee restrooms ® Instruct cleaning crews to use water efficiently for mopping 26 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR Mitigation • • • e • Reportifig Program Mitig,ation,Monitoring • • Reporting Program .� Complionce •� <-r >. Implementation Responsible Veri icaBon Mitigation Measure Documentation:. _ MonitoringActivily, Timing ", _ -Monitor Signature Date o Use brooms,squeegees,and wet/dry vacuums to clean surfaces before washing with.water;do not use hoses as brooms;sweep or blow paved areas to clean,rather than hosing off(applies outside,not inside) ® Avoid washing building exteriors or other outside structures " ■ . Sweep and vacuum parking lots/sidewalks/window surfaces rather than washing with water ® Switch from"wet"carpet cleaning methods,such as steam,to"dry," powder methods;change window-cleaning schedule from"periodic"to "as required" ■ Set automatic optic sensors on icemakers to minimum fill levels to provide lowest possible daily requirement;ensure units are air-cooled and not water-cooled ■ Control the flow of water to the garbage disposal ■ Install and maintain spray rinsers for pot washing and reduce flow of spray rinsers for prewash ■ Turn off dishwashers when not in use—wash only full loads Y e Scrape rather than rinse dishes before washing 7y CD En ® Operate steam tables to minimize excess water use o E' ■ Discontinue use of water softening systems where possible o' ■ Ensure water pressure and flows to dishwashers are set a minimum o required setting 0 ® Install electric eye sensors for conveyer dishwashers N 0 Install flushometer(tankless)toilets with water-saving diaphragms and `^ coordinate automatic systems with work hours so that they don't run continuously ® Use a shut-off nozzle on all hoses that can be adjusted down to a fine spray so that water flows only when needed n Install automatic rain shutoff device on sprinkler systems City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 27 ILa e s e a e s a -e e o •o a -miti0 0 • o • • • o - s eft* • ragrarn, su. ., x f' Implementafior :> : Responsible Verif►cation ;, "M MitigationMeasure w s_ Docu entafion u MoniForing.Acfivifjr Tim►ng Monitor S6 'w9A. Date JI BECSP MM4.15-1 The City shall require by contract specifications that all Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning diesel-powered equipment used would be retrofitted with after-treatment notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a products (e.g., engine catalysts and other technologies available at the and construction plans specifications and grading permit time construction commences)to the extent that they are readily available grading plans and and cost effective when construction .activities commence. Contract construction plans ._specifications shall be 'included,in the proposed project construction for inclusion documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. BECSP MM4.15-2 The City shall require by contract specifications that Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning alternative fuel construction equipment(i.e.,compressed natural gas,liquid notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) would be utilized to the extent and construction plans specifications and grading permit feasible at the time construction activities commence. Contract grading plans and specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction construction plans documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. for inclusion BECSP MM4.15-3 The City shall require that developers within the project Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning site use locally available building materials, such as concrete, stucco, and notes on construction approve contract issuance of a - interior finishes, for construction of the project and associated plans specifications and building permit infrastructure. construction plans for inclusion Y BECSP MM4.15-4 The City shall require developers within the project site Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning to establish a construction management plan with Rainbow Disposal to notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a o divert a target of 50 percent of construction, demolition, and site clearing and construction plans specifications and grading or building waste. grading plans and permit,which o' construction plans occurs earlier Z for inclusion N BECSP MM4.15-5 The City shall require by contract specifications that Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning construction equipment engines will be maintained in good condition and in notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a o proper tune per manufacturer's specification for the duration of and construction plans specifications and grading permit construction. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed grading plans and project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of construction plans Huntington Beach. for inclusion 28 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR kti0 0 0 • e • e • - e• • •• e Mitigation s • • • •i Re-portling Program, . - Compliance Implementation =s" Responsible Vertiication Mffigallon Measure .. DocumentaFion "r Monitoring Activity .:Timing Monitor Signature Date" BECSP MM4.15-6 The City shall require by contract specifications that Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for and construction plans specifications and grading permit more than five minutes. Diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles with grading plans and gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds shall be construction plans turned off when not in use for more than five minutes. Contract for inclusion specifications. shall be included.in the proposed project construction documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. BECSP MM4.15.7 The City shall require that any new development within Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning the Specific Plan area provide signs within loading dock areas clearly notes on construction approve contract issuance of a visible to truck drivers. These signs shall state that trucks cannot idle in plans specifications and building permit excess of five minutes per trip. construction plans for inclusion BECSP MM4.15.8 The City shall require by contract specifications that Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning electrical outlets are included in the building design of future loading docks notes on construction approve contract issuance of a to allow use by refrigerated delivery trucks. Future project-specific plans specifications and building permit Applicants shall require that all delivery trucks do not idle for more than five construction plans minutes. If loading and/or unloading of perishable goods would occur for for inclusion more than five minutes, and continual refrigeration is required, all y refrigerated delivery trucks shall use the electrical outlets to continue powering the truck refrigeration units when the delivery truck engine is turned off. `D 0 BECSP MM4.15-9 The City shall require that any new development within Contract language and Review construction Plan check prior to Planning the project site provide a bulletin board or kiosk in the lobby of each notes on construction plans for inclusion issuance of proposed structure that identifies the locations and schedules of nearby plans certificate of o transit opportunities. occupancy o_ N O City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 29 Res. No. 2012-05 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE j ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH j I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on February 6, 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr NOES: Shaw, Boardman ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None N' CiIWClerk and ex-officioglerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTAC H M E N T #2 City of Huntington Beach r 2000 Main Street * Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 ® www.huntingtonbeachea.gov a r office of the City Clerk Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk NOTICE OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL Appeal of Planning Commission Decision, Public Works Commission Decision or Police Department Decision/Action Date: 12/16/11 To: Planning Department City Attorney City Council Office Administration Public Works Department Police Department(only if Police related item) Filed by: Mayor Don Hansen Re: Planning Commission Denial of EIR No.10-004(Beach and Warner Mixed-Use Project) Date for Public Hearin, TBD Copy of appeal letter attached: Yes Fee collected: n/a Completed by: Rebecca Ross,Senior Deputy City Clerk b/f. ,�� LEGAL NOTICE AND MAILING LABELS MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 15 DAYS PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING DATE Sister Cities: Anjo,Japan + Waitakere,New Zealand Item 10. - 46 HB -21 s- °Lj� CITY F UNTI TO BEACH City Council Interof ce Communication TO: Joan L. Flynn, City Cleric FROM: Don Hansen, Mayo DATE: December 14, 2 1 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL. OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-004 (BEACH AND EL.LIS MIXED USE PROJECT) I hereby appeal the Planning Commission's denial of the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project EIR No. 10-004. On December 13, 2011, the Planning Commission failed to certify the EIR with a 3- 3-1 vote. The primary reason for my appeal is to allow the City Council an opportunity to review the EIR on the merits of its analysis. Pursuant to Section 248.18 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, the City Council shall hear an appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission. Ii SH:MBB:rm `' , . rn cc: City Council Members v Chair and Planning Commission Fred A.Vllilson, City Manager Bob Hall, Deputy City Manager -s Scott{-less, Director of Planning and Building Travis Hopkins,Director of Public Works Herb Fauland, Planning Manager [Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager Robin Lugar, Deputy City Clerk Rosemary Medel,Associate Planner Kim De Colte,Administrative Assistant i g:admn1tr120111020411tn1 1413 -219- Item 10. - 47 ATTACHMENT #3 Item 10. - 18 Hii -.za- BEACH AND ELLI MIXED USE FINAL EIR NO. 10-004 Document Not Attached Available for review at: City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department, 3rd fir., 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA And http:L/www.huntinglonbeachca.gov/­government departmentslPlanning1major /BeachEliisxfrn HB -221- Item 10. - 49 ATTAC H M E N T #4L] City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building 1)epartauent_ STAFF REPORT- TO- Planning Commission FROM: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planm* g and Building BY: Rosemary Medel, Associate Planner DATE: December 13,2011 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-004 (Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project) APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, CA 92648 PROPERTY OWNER: Morrie Golcheh, Progressive Property Management, 10537 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste. 350, Los Angeles, CA 90025 LOCATION: The project site is 2.74-acres, located at the southeast comer of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue. STATEMENT OF ISSUE: o Environmental Impact Report(EIR)No. 10-004: -Analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the development of the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project, which consists of 105 dwelling units, 37,000 square feet of commercial area, 1,850 square feet of public open space including 10,500 square feet of residential open space area on the 2.74 acre project site; -Documents potential impacts to aesthetics, biological resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, air quality, cultural resources, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, utilities and service systems, hazards and hazardous materials, and climate change; -Evaluates three alternatives to the proposed project; and -Concludes that potential impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels for the project with the exception of impacts to air quality (project specific) and transportation/traffic, which would remain significant and unavoidable. o Staff Recommendation: -Certify EIR No. 10-004 because it adequately analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project, identifies project alternatives, provides mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP) Program EIR and General Plan policies, and has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Certify EIR No. 10-004 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements by approving Resolution No. 1657 (Attachment No. 1)." HB -223- #,6I`em 10. - 51 -- 1 � - Trask A Uas1�_4va- a�lert: �, 7it_ ` s CL' amr _1 -. Hai d.Sd_. Ad Vlfestmirsr�i1 '_- F -! i r _ _.}� e1fi➢115 sal - _. �PaPk _ -�_-I -�� .� �;i �L^.':�{ -�=t� ---�'il' ?r...m I_I i its.� -.;-,-3 �`F j I-?-...� 'TR:._•�� _ _ -".i_WI{3Vlrlf71��^.YC -� L_� i--'i ��4^_'S��- i_T•�_11-'•`C:-15� l.._� j - -rrs - -LEanc1 p -z San 1s Pl_ en - kjT t a CEa7EY nV}r �_____ - L ,C = .O- _ '- ELI$lrt- YaLLZ or_ 1•__ 7];W �� _ 4 h4312& vnrE? C2t�t��iii# AweL � -.... - �i—�is� iyy 1�1 �1re 1 ReionaPk21f A1+€ t � rf41;�; f Olam IF .- TM ���?1�+ , -- •µ —_ , t ^e_�3` �k _� LU sin eERNAm&o L. winto brii lI@eC_AYC__.a�aibert`Awe--=--:r_- site - __ fi W:vF.wdi's:tz3UriY g Peet '°" tti¢uuuE Geis y T3_. i dk" jr I { 4 _..-_--.....__, ._ -.c._•'M+il�_i� .--.- _,°:!�- _.- - ads W ,--r-----.- - -- Orange County > r: 2 2•5 x�RrH w Scum 14--rasoft,3tr__­s and-ri{_:asarmz•.Za1a ktkins 201 C. rxcL ML- Figure 3-1 Project Vioinity and Regional Locatlon Map ATKINS Item 10. - 521ort-12/13/11 HB-224- (11sr57 EIR 10-004) ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A. "Continue certification of EIR No. 10-004 and direct staff accordingly." B. "Deny certification of EIR No. 10-004 with findings for denial." PROJECT PROPOSAL: EIR No. 10-004 analyzes development of up to 105 residential units, 37,000 square feet of retail space, 483 parking spaces including 1,850 square feet of public open space, and 10,500 square feet of private open space on 2.74 acres located at the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue. The project improvements include the development of a six-story mixed use project with an internal parking structure allowing for retail along Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue at both the ground and second level with residential units above. bevels four through six accommodate the residential units and the residential open space. The ground-level public open space is provided at the corner of Beach Blvd and Ellis Ave. Under the proposed project the existing service station, restaurant and retail uses would be demolished. The environmental impact report discusses potential adverse impacts in the areas of aesthetics, biological resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, air quality, cultural resources, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, utilities and service systems, hazards and hazardous materials, and climate change. The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the proposed project are addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives. The EIR consists of three volumes. Volumes I and II are the Draft EIR and Appendices that were circulated for a minimum 45-day public review period. Volume III is the Final EIR, which includes the comments received during the public review period, responses to those comments and text changes to the Draft EIR to clarify or correct information in response to comments or as identified as necessary by staff. These volumes are referenced as Attachment No. 2. Backzround: The proposed project is located within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan(BECSP), adopted in March 2010. Development of the project site was included in the Notice of Preparation for the BECSP EIR and analyzed as part of the larger scope of development contemplated for the BECSP EIR (Program EIR No. 08-008), which anticipated approximately 120 dwelling units, 71,000 square feet of retail commercial area and a two-level health club on the project site. As such, the analysis in Draft EIR No. 10-004 is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR where appropriate. PC staff Report-12/13/11 HB -225- (11sr57Item 10. - 53 ISSUES: Subiect Property Land Use, Zoning, and General Plan Desienations: LQCATI®N GENEIUX .PLAIN_ - ZONING:;. Z.1 NO IIS� Subject Property: M-sp-d(Mixed Use—Specific SP—14 (Beach and Edinger General Commercial Uses Plan Overlay—Design Corridors Specific Plan/Town Overlay) Center Neighborhood District) North of Subject M-sp-d,General Commercial, SP-14(BECSP),Residential General Commercial Uses, Property Residential Medium High Medium Density(RM) Vacant Land,Multiple (across Ellis): Density Family Residential East of Subject Property Commercial General Commercial General(CG) Single Room Occupancy (SRO) South of Subject M-sp-d SP— 14 General Commercial Uses Property West of Subject M-sp-d SP—14 General Commercial Uses Property (across Beach): The project site consists of approximately 2.74 acres located on the southeast corner of Beach Blvd. and Ellis Avenue. The project site consists of two parcels. One is developed with a gas station and a building with two service bays totaling 1,678 square feet. The other is developed with 22,080 square feet of retail and restaurant uses and 4,026 square feet of office space, which includes a two story building. General Plan Conformance: The EIR is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the City's General Plan as follows: A.Air QuahLt Element Goal AQ 1: Improve regional air quality by a) decreasing reliance on single occupancy vehicular trips, b) increasing efficiency of transit, c) shortening vehicle trips through a more efficient jobs- housing balance and amore efficient land use pattern, and d)increasing energy efficiency. Policy AQ 1.8.1: Continue to enforce construction site guidelines that require truck operators to minimize particulate emission. Policy AQ 1.8.2: Require installation-of temporary construction facilities (such as wheel washers) and implementation of construction practices that minimize dirt and soil transfer onto public roadways. Policy AQ 1.9: Minimize sensitive uses (residential, hospitals, schools, etc) exposure to toxic emissions. Policv AQ 1.10.1: Continue to require the utilization and installation of energy conservation features in all new construction. Item 10. - 54?ort—12/13/11 HB -226- (11sr57 EIR 10-004) The EIR analysis focuses on the nature and magnitude of the change in the air quality environment due to implementation of the proposed project. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project would result from construction activities, operation of the commercial and residential uses and project-related traffic volumes. Mitigation Measures MM4.2-1 though MM4.2-15 would be implemented to reduce these emissions and minimize impacts to sensitive uses surrounding the project site, such as existing residential and quasi-residential developments to the east and north to the extent feasible. The EIR discusses requirements for all projects to comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, which would also reduce short-term/construction emissions. The analysis in the climate change section of the EIR proposes mitigation measures that are consistent with strategies recommended by the California Climate Action Team and California Air Pollution Control Officers Association for reducing climate change emissions. The EIR also notes that the BECSP requires use of sustainable practices to increase the proposed project's energy efficiency. C. Circulation Element Goal CE 2: Provide a circulation system which supports existing, approved and planned land uses throughout the City while maintaining a desired level of service on all streets and at all intersections. Policy CE 2.1.1: Maintain a city-wide level of service (LOS)not to exceed LOS "D"for intersections during the peak hours. Goal CE 2.3.4: Require new development mitigate its impact on City streets, including but not limited to,pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular conflicts,to maintain adequate levels of service. Obiective CE 2.3: Ensure that the location, intensity and timing of new development is consistent with the provision of adequate transportation infrastructure and standards as defined in the Land Use Element. Policy CE 2.3.1: Require development projects to mitigate off-site traffic impacts and pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular conflicts to the maximum extent feasible. The EIR analyzes the potential for adverse impacts on existing transportation and traffic conditions resulting from implementation of the proposed project. A traffic study was conducted by Austin-Foust Associates and analyzed potential adverse traffic impacts on the intersections surrounding the project site including Beach Blvd and Ellis Avenue, Main Street and Ellis Avenue, and Beach Blvd and Talbert Avenue as well as the BECSP study area. The EIR documents that the project would not result in significant impacts to the level of service at the two closest intersections. Mitigation Measures MM4.13-1 through MM4.13-15 require mitigation of the project's contribution to the intersections and freeway ramp determined to be significantly impacted as a result of implementation of the BECSP through payment of fees that would provide the project's fair share toward improving the roadway system. The EIR also analyzes the project's potential to create adverse impacts from inadequate parking capacity, alternative transportation policies, pedestrian and bicyclist safety and emergency access. with implementation of existing code requirements, mitigation measures adopted for the BECSP and proposed project-specific mitigation measures, impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level. PC Staff Report—12/13/11 5 (l lsr57-- HB -227- Item 10. - 55 D. Environmental Hazards Element Goal EH 1: Ensure that the number of deaths and injuries, levels of property damage, levels of economic and social disruption and interruption of vital services resulting from seismic activity and geologic hazards shall be within acceptable levels of risk. Obiective EH 1.1: Ensure that land use planning in the City accounts for seismic and geologic risk, including groundshaking, liquefaction, subsidence, soil and slope stability and water table levels. Obiective EH 1.2: Ensure that new structures are designed to minimize damage resulting from seismic hazards, ensure that existing unsafe structures are retrofitted to reduce hazards and mitigate other existing unsafe conditions. Policy EH 1.2.1: Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand groundshaking and liquefaction such as stated in the Uniform Building Code. Goal EH 3: Ensure the safety of the City's businesses and residents from methane hazards. Obiective EH 3.2: Minimize methane hazards in the identified Methane Overlay District, and other areas outside the Methane Overlay Districts as may later be defined, through the regulation of construction and adherence to the City's Methane Hazard Mitigation Plan. Policy EH 3.2.2: Establish, enforce, and periodically update testing requirements for sites proposed for new construction within the identified Methane Overlay District. The E1R analyzes the existing physical setting of the project site as it relates to hazards and hazardous materials and its potential impact on human health resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Mitigation.Measures MM4.6-1 through MM4.6-4 ensure that all impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials would be less than significant. To ensure that the proposed project is designed to minimize damage resulting from seismic hazards and that new structures are engineered to withstand groundshaking and liquefaction, Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 would be implemented requiring a final soils and geotechnical report, which would recommend design measures to be implemented in the final project design. E. Environmental Resources/Conservation Element Policy ERC 2.1.10: Conduct construction activities to minimize adverse impacts on existing wildlife resources. Mitigation Measure 4.3-1 requires that prior to construction or any vegetation removal that appropriate surveys shall be conducted to ensure that no nesting habitats are disturbed, including impact-avoidance measures. F. Growth Management Element Goal GM 1: Provide adequate police services to meet the needs of the City's population.. Item 10. - 56,ort-12n3/11 HB -228- (1tsr57 Elk 10-004) Goal GM 1.1.3: Continue to provide a 5-minute response time for Priority 1 calls for service at least 85% of the time. Calls are considered Priority 1 where there is a threat to life or property. Policy GM 1.1.7: Ensure that new development site design incorporates measures to maximize policing safety and security. Goal GM 2: Provide adequate fire and paramedic services to meet the needs of the City's population. Policy GM2.1.2: Provide a 5-minute response time for emergency fire services at least 80 percent of the time. Policy GM 2.1.3: Provide a 5-minute response time for paramedic services at least 80 percent of the time. The EIR evaluates the effects of the proposed project on public services by identifying anticipated demands on existing and planned service availability. The analysis concludes that the proposed project would not require new or physically altered fire or police facilities to maintain adequate response times and staffing. However, in order to ensure that an adequate level of service is provided through the build- out of the specific plan, a mitigation measure is recommended, which would ensure that funding is available to maintain acceptable response times and staffing levels for Police and Fire. Policy GM 1.1.7: Ensure that new development site design incorporates measures to maximize policing safety and security. Policy GM2.1.4: Ensure that new development site design incorporates measures to maximize fire safety and prevention. The provisions of the BECSP require Fire Department review and approval of the proposed project to ensure that adequate circulation is provided to enable emergency access to the site and meet Fire code standards for circulation aisle widths. Mitigation Measure 4.6-4 would require adequate access for emergency vehicles during project construction. G.Hazardous Materials Element Goal HM 1: Reduce, to the greatest degree possible, the potential for harm to life, property, and the environment from hazardous materials and hazardous waste. Obiective HM 1.1: Promote the proper handling, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and hazardous waste. Mitigation Measures 4.6-1 through 4.6-3 ensure remediation of contaminated soils containing hazardous materials prior to development of the proposed project and by providing supplemental procedures in the event of unanticipated discoveries of contaminants during construction. As described in the EIR some site remediation has already occurred and is ongoing with regulatory protocols in place. If unknown contamination is encountered, a Risk Management Plan shall be prepared and implemented that identifies the contaminants of concern and the potential risk posed to human health. H.Historic and Cultural Resources Element PC Staff Report—12/13/11 7 (11sr57FEZ 10-004) HB -229- Item 10. - 57 Obiective HCR 1.1: Ensure that all of the City's historically and archaeologically significant resources are identified and protected. The impact analysis for cultural resources is based on the findings of the cultural records search and site survey conducted for the proposed project.. No evidence of previously undiscovered archeological resources on the project site was encountered during the survey and record search. Although no cultural resources have been recorded on the project site, Mitigation Measures MM4.4-2 (b) and MM4.4-3 (b) would ensure that impacts from the discovery of resources during project construction would be less than significant. Due to the age of the strictures on the site, MM4.4-1 would also be required to further evaluate the structures prior to demolition. I. HousiM Element Goal H 2: Provide adequate housing sites to accommodate regional housing needs. The EIR includes an analysis of the project's impacts on population and housing and is based on the BECSP Program EIR, which included analysis of the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) fixture housing need as determined by SCAG population projections. The BECSP anticipates 4,500 residential units during the life of the Plan, which would provide needed housing for the City and the region, contributing to the City's progress towards meeting its RHNA numbers. The allocated housing is divided between the two corridors permitting a maximum of 2,755 units on Beach Blvd and 1,745 units on Edinger Ave. The proposed project represents approximately 2.3 percent of the total dwelling units approved under the BECSP. J. Land Use Element Goal LU2 Ensure that development is adequately served by transportation infrastructure, utility infrastructure, and public services. Policy LU2.1.2Require that the type, amount, and location of development be correlated with the provision of adequate supporting infrastructure and services (as defined in the Circulation and Public Utilities and Services Elements of the General Plan). Policy L U 2.1.3 Limit the type, location, and/or timing of development where there is inadequate public infrastructure and/or services to support land use development. Policy LU 7.1.5Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that maintain the City's fiscal viability and integrity of environmental resources. The EIR mitigation measures require that infrastructure is provided or upgraded during project construction to adequately provide service for the project commensurate with the project's demand for services and impacts on existing infrastructure. In addition:,the EIR describes the existing site conditions and the characteristics of the proposed mixed use project and identifies the BECSP district that governs the project site. The EIR discusses that the project was designed to respond to issues facing the Beach Boulevard Corridor as well as achieve the stated community objectives of the project that are identified in the EIR. Through conformance to the BECSP Development Code, the EIR states that the project Item 10. - 58)ort— 12/13/11 HB -230- (11sr57 EIR 10-004) would provide a mix of uses that support the City's image and enhance the quality of life and the environment and meet the objectives of the Specific Plan to revitalize the Corridors. K. Noise Element Goal N 1: Ensure that all necessary and appropriate actions are taken to protect Huntington. Beach residents, employees,visitors, and noise sensitive uses from the adverse impacts created by excessive noise levels from stationary and ambient sources. Objective N 1.2: Prevent and mitigate the adverse impacts of excessive noise exposure on the residents, employees,visitors, and noise sensitive uses of Huntington Beach. Policy N 1.2.1: Require, in areas where noise levels exceed an exterior Ld. of 60 dB(A) and an interior Ldn of 45 dB(A), that all new development of"noise sensitive" land uses, such as housing, health care facilities, schools, libraries, and religious facilities, include appropriate buffering and/or construction mitigation measures that will reduce noise exposure to levels within acceptable limits. Polig N 1.2.3: Require development, in all areas where the ambient noise level exceeds an LdI of 60 dB(A), to conduct an acoustical analysis and incorporate special design measures in their construction,thereby,reducing interior noise levels to the 45 dB(A) Ld,level. The EIR includes a noise analysis consistent with CEQA requirements. The EIR mitigation measures require an acoustical analysis before issuance of building permits to ensure that interior noise levels for new residential units would not exceed established standards of the City's Noise Ordinance. Mitigation Measures MM4.9-4 and MM4.9-5 would be required to attenuate noise from HVAC systems and implement design measures to ensure that noise levels in new residential units do not exceed the standards set forth in Section 8.40.070 and Section 8.40.080 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. Objective N 1.6: Minimize the impacts of construction noise on adjacent uses. Policy N 1.6.1- Ensure that construction activities be regulated to establish hours of operation, to prevent and/or mitigate the generation of excessive or adverse noise impacts through the implementation of the existing Noise Ordinance and/or any future revisions to the Noise Ordinance. Under the City's Municipal Code, construction activities can only occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM from Monday through Saturday. Mitigation Measures MM4.9-1 through 4.9-3 would farther restrict construction hours for the highest noise producing activities and ensure that impacts associated with construction activities are minimized to the maximum extent feasible. As such, impacts would be less than significant. L. Public Facilities and Services Element Objective PF 1.1: Provide adequate police facilities and personnel to correspond with population and service demands, and provide protection for the community from illicit activities and crime. Polio PF 1.3.2: Ensure that new development and land use proposals are analyzed to determine the impact on their operators, occupants,visitors, or customers may have on the safety and welfare of the community. PC staff Report-12/13/11 HB -231- (11sr5'Item 10. - 59 Goal PF 2: Ensure adequate protection from fire and medical emergencies for Huntington Beach residents and property owners. Polite PF 2.3.1: Continue to require all structures to follow all State and nationally recognized fire codas. The EIR includes an analysis of impacts to police and fire facilities and services. Implementation of the proposed project would not significantly impact the level of service delivery for the project area and would not require any new or physically altered police and fire facilities to maintain adequate response times and staffing. However,to further ensure the safety of residents of the proposed project as build-out of the specific plan area occurs, Mitigation Measure MM 4.11-1 is recommending that the City provide sufficient funding to maintain the City's standard and average level of service through the use of General Fund monies. Additionally, the EIR analyzes the public services emergency response needs in relationship to adding population resulting from the built environment. Compliance with the regulations of the California Fire Code pertaining to fire protection systems and equipment, general safety precautions, and many tither general and specialized fire-safety requirements for new and existing structures reduce potential impacts. Policy PF 4.2.3: Ensure that development shall not occur without providing for adequate school facilities, The EIR includes an analysis of potential impacts to schools. The EIR documents that direct population growth resulting from the proposed project would not have an adverse impact on the capacity of schools within the school districts serving the project site. With the implementation of Code Requirements 4.11-1 and 4.11-3, fees collected would offset any additional increase in educational demand at the elementary school,middle school, and high school levels serving the proposed project. Objective PF 5,1: Provide adequate library service that responds to the needs of the community. The EIR includes an analysis of potential impacts to library services. The existing library facilities are adequate to accommodate the increase in users from the proposed project. However, implementation of Code Requirement 4.11-4, payment of library and community enrichment impact fees, would ensure that the additional residents as a result of the proposed project would not significantly affect library services. M. Recreation and Community Services Element Policy RCS 2.1.1: Maintain the current park per capita ratio of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons, which includes the beach in the calculation. The EIR documents that project effects are not found to be significant with respect to recreation. The EIR analysis evaluates that the increased use of existing parks is determined based on the ability for the project to provide parkland onsite at a ratio of 5 acres per 1,000 new residents, or equivalent payment of park fees. The project would be consistent with the BECSP Development Standards for the Town Center Neighborhood designation. BECSP Section 2.6.1 requires the provision of public open spaces that are accessible to the public and include seating, lighting and landscaping, at rate of 50 sf for every 1,000 sf of retail (including restaurant) use and 50 sf per residential dwelling unit. Based on the proposed square footage of uses, the project is required to provide a minimum of 7,100 square feet of public open space Item 10. - 60)ort-12/13/11 HB -232- (11sr57 EIR 10-004) and designed in one of the public open space types as required to satisfy the requirements of the BECSP Section 2.6.1 (Provision of Public Open Space). Under the site plan review process, the proposed development plan will be evaluated for compliance with the standards for public and private open space pursuant to BECSP development standards. Additionally, the City's General Plan park and population ratio would not be significantly affect by the project. N. Urban Design Element Goal UD 1: Enhance the visual image of the City of Huntington Beach. Objective UD 1.3: Strengthen the visual character of the City's street hierarchy in order to clarify the City's structure and improve Citywide identity. Policy UD 1.1.3: Require a consistent design theme and/or landscape design character along the community's corridors that reflects the unique qualities of each district. Ensure that streetscape standards for the major commercial corridors, the residential corridors, and primary and secondary image corridors provide each corridor with its own identity while promoting visual continuity throughout the City. The EIR provides a description of the existing site conditions and analyzes the extent to which the visual character of the project site would change and additional sources of light and glare as a result of the proposed project would occur. Consistent with the BECSP Program. EIR, a mitigation measure is recommended to require that the project maximize use of non-reflective facade treatments. In addition, a shade and shadow analysis was conducted, as required by the BECSP Program EIR, to examine the effects of shade and shadow on light dependent uses. The EIR states that the project's adherence to the standards and guidelines of the BECSP would reflect the design and landscape themes that were adopted for the project area. The EIR states that the site plan/conditional use permit review process would ensure conformance to the standards and references the required findings for approval. O. Utilities Element Objective U 1.2: Ensure that existing and new development does not degrade the City's surface waters and groundwater basins. Policy U 1.2.1: Require that existing and new developments contain safeguards and mitigation measures preventing degradation. The EIR includes an analysis of the proj ect's impacts on hydrology and water quality. The analysis is based on the analysis included in the BECSP Program EIR and site-specific conditions. The recommended mitigation measures require compliance with the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements in place at the time of construction and include site design BMPs incorporating Low Impact Development (LID) principles as defined in the Municipal NPDES Permit such as porous concrete and green roofs. The recommended mitigation measures also require that a final hydrology and hydraulic study as well as a groundwater hydrology study be prepared to ensure that the specific hydrologic conditions of the project site are reflected in project design. Implementation of modified measures BECSP MM4.7-3 and BECSP MM4.7-4 is required to assess the contribution of a project to potential system capacity constraints and provide for construction of necessary upgrades to PC Staff Report—12/13/11 11 (11 sr57` HB -233- Item 10. - 61 storm drain system capacities to mitigate hydrology and water quality impacts to a less than significant level. Objective U 1.3: Minimize water consumption rates through site design, use of efficient systems, and other techniques. Policy U 1.1.1: Monitor the demands on the water system, manage the development to mitigate impacts and/or facilitate improvements to the water supply and distribution system, and maintain and expand water supply and distribution facilities. Policy U 1.3.2: Continue to require the incorporation of water conservation features in the design of all new and existing uses such as the use of native plants, low flow toilets and water efficient appliances. Objective U 1.4 Ensure the costs of improvements to the water supply, transmission, distribution, storage and treatment systems are borne by those who benefit. Policy U 1.4.1: Require the cost of improvements to the existing water supply and distribution facilities necessitated by the new development be borne by the new development benefiting from the improvements, either through the payment of fees, or the actual construction of the improvements in accordance with State Nexus Legislation. The EIR states that the City has demonstrated significant water conservation over the last 10 years. The EIR concludes that the City's consistent conservation program and existing code requirements for water efficient landscaping in conjunction with Mitigation Measure MM4.14-1 requiring additional water conservation practices would ensure that the project's impact on water supplies would be less than significant. In addition, Project Code Requirement CR4.14-5 provides that all applicable impact fees for wastewater and utilities be paid by the developer to provide for the project's fair share toward the cost of planned future utilities. Policy U 1.2.2: Require new developments to connect to the sewer system. Policy U 2.1.5: Maintain, upgrade, and expand existing wastewater collection and treatment facilities. Policy U 2.1.6: Require that sewer capacity is available before building permits are issued for new development. Objective U.2.2: Ensure the costs of wastewater infrastructure improvements are borne by those that benefit. Policy U.2.2.1: Require the costs of improvements to the existing wastewater collection facilities, which are necessitated by new development, to be borne by the new development benefiting from the improvements; either through the payment of fees, or by the actual construction of the improvements in accordance with State Nexus Legislation. The EIR discloses that implementation of the proposed project could require new sewer connections and that the project would be required to pay a fee for connection to the Orange County Sanitation District, Item 10. - 62)ort-12/13/11 HB -234- (11sr57 EIR 10-004) based on the increase in anticipated use of the sewage system. The fee ensures that the project would pay its share of any necessary expansion of the system, including expansion of wastewater treatment facilities. Implementation of CR4.14-3 and CR4.144 would ensure that capacity constraints at the time of development are accurately identified through a required sewer study, which would specify necessary upgrades required for the project. Project Code Requirement CR4.14-5 provides that all applicable impact fees for wastewater and utilities be paid by the developer to provide for the project's fair share toward the cost of planned fixture utilities. Objective U 3.3: Ensure that storm drain facilities (channels and outputs) do not generate significant adverse impacts on the environment in which the facilities traverse or empty. The EIR concludes that Mitigation Measures 4.7-1 through 4.7-4 would ensure that an adequate stormwater conveyance system would be implemented for the proposed project through implementation of existing codes and regulations. Mitigation Measure 4.7-1 would ensure a reduction in potential pollutant loads and ensure that appropriate construction and operation of stormwater treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) are used. The EIR concludes that conformance to existing regulatory requirements in conjunction with the proposed mitigation measures would ensure that construction of stormwater drainage facilities would not result in substantial environmental effects and potential impacts would be less than significant. Obiective U 5.1: Ensure that adequate natural gas, telecommunication, and electrical systems are provided. An adequate supply of electricity is anticipated to be available to serve the proposed project. Development of the proposed project would comply with the provisions of Title 24 and the Cal Green Building Code. The EIR analysis demonstrates that both electricity and natural gas will experience a less than significant impact as a result of the project. Zoning Compliance: Not applicable. Urban Design Guidelines Conformance: Not applicable. Environmental,Status: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), EIR No. 10-004 was prepared by Atkins to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project as well as identify appropriate mitigations measures. The proposed project is located within the BECSP, adopted in March 2010. Development on this project site was included in the Notice of Preparation for the BECSP EIR(Program EIR No. 2008-008), which anticipated a total of 120 residential units and 7 1,000 square feet of retail commercial and a two-level health club for the subject property. The 45-day review of EIR No. 10-004 began on Friday, September 9, 2011 and closed on Monday, October 24, 2011. The Final Draft EIR, including the Responses to Comments and any text changes as a result of the public comment period,was distributed to the Planning Commission and posted on the City's website November. The required CEQA procedure that was followed is outlined below: PC Staff Report-12/13/11 HB -235- Ulsr5 i Item 10. - 63 July 2009 Staff conducted an initial study and determined that an EIR would be required July 31, 2009 A Notice of Preparation was filed with the State Clearinghouse to notify public of intent to prepare an EIR. July 31, 2009 to Initial Study/Notice of Preparation available for 30 day public review August 31, 2009 and comment period. August 21, 2009 A Public Scoping Meeting was held to solicit comments and issue areas to be studied in the EIR, September 2, 2011 Notice of Completion was filed with the State Clearinghouse. September 9, 2011 to Draft EIR available for public review and comment for forty-five October 24, 2011 days. October 6, 2011 A Public Comment Meeting was held to solicit comments on the adequacy of the Draft EIR. December 13, 2011 Public hearing is scheduled before the Planning Commission to Certify Final EIR No. 10-004 Tbrough the use of appropriate mitigation measures identified in the EIR, the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. However, there are one project-specific and three cumulative significant adverse environmental impacts anticipated from the proposed project that cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures. The significant adverse environmental impacts are as follows: Air Quality > Project Specific and Cumulative—Construction of the proposed project would violate an air quality standard as it would result in emissions that exceed the SCAQMD threshold of significance for VOCs. Transportation/Traffic > Cumulative—Under 2030 conditions, operation of the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to an unacceptable Level of Service at two City intersections. > Cumulative—Under 2030 conditions, operation of proposed project would cumulatively contribute to an increase in delay at two Caltrans intersections and would increase traffic to the I- 405 northbound loop ramp, which is currently deficient. Environmental Board: The City's Environmental Board reviewed the EIR and provided a comment letter during the DER process. The Environmental Board comments refer mainly to open space design, mobility and traffic levels of service. As discussed in the DEIR,there are mitigation measures and code requirements already Item 10. - 64port-12/13/11 HB -236- (11sr57 EIR 10-004) in place to regulate development as well as the development code requirements of the Specific Plan_ The Environmental Board comment letter and responses to the letter are provided in Attachment No. 3. Coastal Status:Not applicable. Redevelopment Status: Not applicable. Desiim Review Board: Not applicable Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Other Departments Concerns and Requirements: The ETR was circulated to other Departments for review and comment. All Department comments and recommendations are incorporated into the EIR and its mitigation measures. Compliance with mitigation measures will be enforced through the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Refer to Attachment No. 1, Exhibit A). Public Notification: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach Independent on Thursday, December 1, 2001, and notices were sent to property owners of record and occupants within a 1,000 ft. radius of the project site, interested parties, and individuals/organizations that commented on the environmental document. As of December 6, 2011, no communications on the draft EIR, other than letters included in the Final EMIResponse to Comments and additional Errata,have been received. Application Processinz Dates: DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S): Draft EIR: May 25, 2011 Within 1 year of complete application May 25, 2012 ANALYSIS: The analysis provides an overview of the EIR and its conclusions, a review of the project alternatives, and a summary of the response to comments. EIR Overview The EIR provides a detailed analysis of potential impacts associated with the proposed project. It is intended to serve as an informational document for decision makers. This EIR identifies significant or potentially significant environmental effects, as well as ways in which those impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels, whether through the imposition of code requirements (CRs), mitigation measures (MMs), or through the implementation of alternatives to the project. In a practical sense, EIRs function as a technique for fact-finding, allowing future applicants, concerned citizens, and staff an opportunity to collectively review and evaluate baseline conditions and project impacts through a process of full disclosure. PC Staff Report—12/13/11 xB-237- (11sr57 Item 10. - 65 o Scope of EIR Analysis As the analysis in EIR No. 10-004 is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR, the environmental impacts for certain issue areas of the project are substantially consistent with the analysis in the BECSP Program EIR and did not require substantial additional analysis. Based on a preliminary environmental analysis and a review of the BECSP Program EIR, the following issue areas did not require substantial additional analysis in EIR No. 10-004: ■ Biological Resources ■ Cultural Resources ■ Geology and Soils ■ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ■ Hydrology and Water Quality ■ Land Use and Planning ■ Population and Housing ■ Climate Change The following issue areas were determined to require additional project-specific analysis, based on the particulars of the project or changes in the recommended air quality model since the Program EIR was certified: ■ AestheticsNisual Quality ■ Air Quality ■ Noise ■ Public Services ■ Recreation ■ Transportation/Traffic ■ Utilities and Service Systems No impacts to Agricultural Resources and Mineral Resources were determined; as such, no analysis is provided in the draft EIR. A complete listing of the recommended mitigation measures is provided in the Mitigation Monitoring Program provided in Attachment No. 1. e Aesthetics Implementation of the project will change the visual character of the project and add new sources of light and glare. However, the EIR acknowledges that the project is proposed in an existing urban environment in which building glare and a significant amount of ambient nighttime lighting already exists. Development standards relating to the visual quality and character of proposed development include regulations for building scale; frontage and building placement; streets; open space; architecture; and signage_ The proposed project would be designed in compliance with the standards of the BECSP. Permitted heights in this segment are allowed from two to six stories. Substantial deviations from the development regulations in the BECSP would require approval of a discretionary permit. The EIR also documents that there would not be significant impacts with respect to shade and shadows. Based on the analysis, impacts would be less than significant. Air Quality The EIR analysis focuses on the nature and magnitude of the change in the air quality environment due to the implementation of the proposed project. Air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project would result from construction activities, operation of uses allowed under the proposed Specific Plan, and project-related traffic volumes. Air quality modeling was completed consistent with South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)recommendations. Item 10. - 66.)ort-12n3/11 HB -238- (11sr57 EIR 10-004) Construction Emissions-Short Term Impacts: Construction activities conducted as part of implementation of the proposed project would exceed SCAQMD significance thresholds for VOCs during architectural coating associated with Phase 1 and 2 of project construction_ Mitigation measures MM 4.2- 1 through MM 4.2-15 would be implemented to reduce emissions. However, they may not reduce construction emissions for VOCs to levels below the SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, short-term air quality impacts would be significant and unavoidable during project construction. Operational Emissions-Long Term Impacts: Operational emissions generated by both stationary and mobile sources would result from normal day-to-day operations upon development and completion of project construction. Although the proposed project would reduce vehicle trips in comparison to vehicle trips estimated in the existing General Plan for the BECSP Program EIR, the proposed project would increase vehicle trips in the area above existing conditions. The analysis of the daily operational emissions from the proposed project was prepared utilizing the computer model recommended by the SCAQMD. The proposed project would not generate emissions that exceed the thresholds of significance recommended by the SCAQMD; therefore,the impacts would be less than significant. The EIR examined if localized CO concentrations at nearby intersections would be increased beyond state and national standards as a result of increased vehicle traffic. The EIR analysis determined that the proposed project will not cause localized CO concentrations at nearby intersections to exceed national or state ambient air quality standards. Therefore, "hot spots" are not anticipated to occur at local intersections as a result of project implementation. a Biological Resources The EIR evaluates the potential for implementation of the Specific Plan to have substantial adverse impacts on biological resources. The project is predominantly developed and consists of office, retail and restaurant uses and on grade parking and is approximately 95 percent covered with buildings and paved surfaces. Urban landscape is intermixed with the developed uses on the project site. The EIR includes a standard mitigation measure to ensure that the project would not result in impacts to sensitive or protected migratory avian species during construction. The EIR concluded that the project would have no impacts on federally protected wetlands, habitat conservation plans or special.status species. Therefore, the EIR analysis concluded that impacts will be less than significant. o Cultural and Paleontological Resources The project site is almost entirely paved and existing buildings on the site were constructed in the mid- 1965. According to the historic resources study prepared for the BECSP area, of which this project is a part,there are no recorded historic resources on this project site or in the immediate vicinity, however, the BECSP mitigation measure that requires a qualified professional to conduct a site-specific historical survey and record search when a structure is at least 45 years old is applicable at this project site. The impact analysis for cultural resources is based on the findings of a cultural records search and site survey conducted for the proposed project. Although, based on surrounding development and existing development, it is not thought that archeological resources exist in the immediate area, mitigation pleasure BECSP MM4.4-2(b) would be required to prevent significant adverse impacts to archeological resources, if any, and incorporation of this mitigation measure reduces impacts to less than. significant. PC Staff Report-12/13/11 HB -239- Glsrs7Item 10. - 67 o Geology and Soils The EIR includes an analysis of potential adverse impacts on existing geologic and soils conditions on the project site from the BECSP Program EIR and a site-specific geotechnical investigation. The EIR analyzed geologic hazards and potential seismic hazards in the project area giving consideration to the geologic constraints such as fault rupture, groundshaking and liquefaction. The E1R concludes that code requirements and Mitigation Measure MM4.5-1 would be required to ensure a less than significant impact. o Hazards and Hazardous Materials The EIR analyzes the existing physical setting of the project site as it relates to hazards and hazardous materials and its potential impact on human health resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Local as well as state agencies have the authority to implement site remediation of any hazardous materials and regulate the transportation of any hazardous materials removed from sites. The EIR documents that in January 2007, the gas station and dry cleaning facility were identified to be of potential environmental concern for the proposed project site. The EIR discusses that the active gas station is a Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) site with on-going remediation of soil and quarterly groundwater monitoring under the oversight of the Santa Arta Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) and Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA). Various work plans have been submitted to and were approved by OCHCA to remediate any existing conditions. Therefore, remediation efforts remain active at the project site and will be ongoing with implementation of the proposed project. The dry cleaner's facility remediation was completed in 2010. The EIR concludes that with implementation of existing code requirements and Mitigation Measures MM4.6-1 through MM4.64 all impacts would be less than significant. At the November 22, 2011 Planning Commission Study Session, Commissioner Bixby asked if staff knew of any residential projects that had been built with on-going remediation and if the wording of the mitigation measures was problematic in terms of occupancy being granted if remediation is on-going. The Fire Department is not aware of any such residential projects. To provide clarification, additional wording has been provided to MM4.6-1 in the Errata. Hydrology and Water Quality Pursuant to mitigation measures, the project is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and complete a hydrology study prior to the issuance of Precise Grading or Building permits to identify measures to reduce runoff to a level consistent with the maximum extent practicable and treatment control BMPs. The entire project site is located within an urbanized area and would ultimately discharge to Sully Miller Lake. Preliminary studies indicate on-site attenuation and detention and implementation of BMPS will minimize impacts_ Mitigation measures also require compliance with the current National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements in place at the time of construction. Other mitigation measures include site design B.MPs incorporating LID principals as defined in the Municipal NPDES Permit. The EIR concludes that impacts to hydrology and water quality would be less than significant. Item 10. - 6 WOrt— 12/13/11 HB1-240- (I 1 sr57 Fsx 10-404) o Land Use and Planning The proposed project its subject to the Town Center-Neighborhood development standards of the adopted BECSP. The general uses proposed and analyzed in the ER are permitted uses for this district_ Compliance with the development standards, regulations and guidelines of the BECSP would be reviewed through the project approval process. Within this district, development is permitted to a height of six stories. Aspects of the project design do not frilly comply with the height restrictions, which would necessitate a possible variance or redesign. The EIR concludes impacts to land use and planning would be less than significant. In response to a question from Commissioner Bixby at the Study Session, the attached Errata includes a correction to page 4.8-4. Commissioner Bixby also inquired about the residential parking in terms of spaces per unit for the proposed project and increased residential Alternative 3. The proposed project is conceptual and estimates building 105 units. Staff analyzed the parking demand for 2 bedroom units. Therefore, a total of 158 parking stalls is required including 21 stalls for guest parking. The project proposes 263 stalls allocated for the residential component of the project. Alternative 3 includes 274 units: 25 studio units, 117 one-bedroom units, 125 two-bedroom units and 7 live-work units. Total required parking is 365 stalls; 463 spaces are provided. Commissioner Farley requested the square footage for the residential portion of the conceptual proposal. A total of 235,000 square feet is allocated to the residential portion, which anticipates units of approximately 1,200 square feet and the remainder of the square footage divided between unit access areas,private and common open space. o Noise Potential noise impacts related to short-term construction activities and long-term changes in ambient conditions primarily related to increases in traffic were analyzed in the EIR. Analysis was based on noise measurements conducted as part of the BECSP Program EIR. Ambient noise level measurements at locations near the project site and roadway noise levels were calculated using data from the traffic study. Construction-related groundborne noise and vibration may result in human annoyance and/or potentially damage the foundations and exteriors of other structures. Implementation of mitigation measures MM4.9-1 through MM4.9-3 would help to reduce this impact to less than significant levels. Long term noise generated by implementation of the proposed project would include new stationary sources such as rooftop heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems for the residential and commercial uses, which is addressed by MM4.9-4. The proposed project would also introduce new activity and noise to the area as residences are included and people are attracted to the new mix of uses that would develop as part of the proposed project. The noise monitoring studies show that existing noise levels at various points in the Specific Plan area currently exceed the City noise standards for residential uses, especially along Beach Boulevard. Development of new residences in areas where existing noise levels currently exceed the City standard would constitute a significant impact. Mitigation measure MM4.9-5 shall be implemented for all residential development within the Specific Plan area where the existing noise levels exceed the City standards as set forth in Section 8.40.070 and Section 8.40.080 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. The EIR concludes that long term impacts would be less than significant. At the Planning Commission Study Session, Commissioner Bixby asked three questions related to the noise analysis. In response to the question regarding a loading dock area for Alternative 3, none is required nor proposed. A question was asked about how mixed use development is treated for regulation by the Noise Ordinance, which lists residential, commercial and office as discreet uses. The City has PC Staff Report-12/13/11 HB -241- (11sr5'Item 10. - 69 required the residential component of mixed use projects to meet the requirements of the residential noise zone standards. The Noise Ordinance allows temporary spikes in noise; thus, increases in noise due to commercial operations, e.g. deliveries, can be accommodated within the allowable standards. At the project approval stage, the City would recommend conditions of approval that have been used on other mixed use projects in the City to address noise transmission between the residential and commercial components of the development. Finally, a question was asked regarding potential impacts of idling diesel trucks on the SRO. The SRO is considered a commercial use per the Noise Ordinance because it is supposed to be for transient use (monthly tenancies only per the ZSO). At the SRO location potential noise associated with idling would be approximately 66-68 dbA, comparable with what it is today with existing truck deliveries. a Population and Housing This section of the EIR analyzes the potential for the project to induce population and employment growth beyond current growth projections and as analyzed and adopted in the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan and Program.EIR. This project represents approximately 2.3 percent of the permitted units in the BECSP and is within the maximum amount of new development (MA,ND) specified within the BECSP. Residential development on the project site was accounted for in the overall population growth analysis performed in the BECSP EIR, which assumed a maximum residential build out of 4,500 new dwelling units in the BECSP. The City's Zoning Code and the BECSP Section 2.2.3 (Affordable Housing Requirements) will regulate construction of affordable units within the development project to meet the needs of the community, consistent with Policies 2.2 and 3.1 of the City's General Plan Housing Element. The proposed project would not conflict with any of the applicable General Plan polices and is consistent with the BECSP EIR; therefore,the project related impacts are considered less than significant. The proposed project would not displace any housing or residents as the entire site is developed with commercial uses. Therefore, the impacts related to population and housing would be less than significant. s Public Services The EIR evaluates the effects of the proposed project on public services (fire, police, schools and libraries) by identifying anticipated demands on existing and planned service availability. The analysis concludes that the proposed project would not require new or physically altered fire or police facilities to maintain adequate response times and service ratios. The Growth Management Element of the General Plan establishes the population to service ratios. The addition of the proposed project is not expected to notably affect service responses. The EIR also identifies standard code requirements, which require payment of development impact fees to address a project's impact on public services and facilities such as schools and libraries, and concludes that impacts will be less than significant. In response to questions at the Planning Commission Study Session, the additional Errata to the EIR (Attachment No. 3) includes updated library staffing information. In addition, Commissioner Bixby inquired about enrollment trends at Dwyer Middle School. Data available from the California Department of Education indicate the school's enrollment has been increasing. Finally, there was a question regarding Fire Department response times and the related mitigation measure. As far back as 2007 the Fire Department response time has been within approximately 5 minutes 59% of the time. Methods to reduce response time continue to be utilized such as automatic aid with surrounding fire agencies (closest unit, responds regardless of city boundaries), efficient computed aided dispatch, and traffic signal preempted (Opticoms). Other dispatch methods to reduce response time are also being Item 10. - 70PO'12;13i11 HB^-242- (1 1 sr57 EIR 10-004) explored such as automotive vehicle locator (AVL) and move up module software (NIUIV1), which strategically positions response units closer to emergency calls. The mitigation measure reflects the fact that the City continues to evaluate how best to provide fire service on an annual basis subject to the budgetary process, which is deemed adequate because there were no significant project specific impacts identified. o- Recreation The EIR analyzes the potential for adverse impacts on existing recreational facilities and opportunities and the expansion of recreational facilities resulting from implementation of the proposed project. The City's parkland ratio could be affected by increased demands for recreational areas due to the increase in residential development. The impact to the ratio of parkland to population of 5 acres per 1,000 persons is considered to be less than significant with payment of required park fees pursuant to Project CR4.1 2-l. • Transportation/Traffic The EIR analyzes the potential for adverse impacts on existing transportation and traffic conditions resulting from implementation of the proposed project. The traffic study was conducted by Austin-Foust Associates and analyzed potential adverse traffic impacts on the immediate area surrounding the project site and the intersections of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue, Main Street and Ellis Avenue, and Beach Blvd and Talbert Avenue as well as the BECSP study area. Intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service with implementation of the BECSP mitigation measures including those within the immediate vicinity of the project site. However, the project will contribute to the cumulative impacts identified within the BECSP Program EIR. Due to the nature of transportation and traffic issues, the project study area as it relates to this EIR section is larger than the project site. As part of the environmental analysis of the BECSP, intersection capacity utilization(ICU) analysis was performed at intersections throughout the overall BECSP area. ICU values are used to determine levels of service at study area intersection locations and provide a means to quantitatively estimate incremental traffic impacts. The proposed project would result in a 30 percent decrease in the AM peak hours, 37 percent decrease in the PM peak hours, and an overall 43 percent trip reduction for average daily trips (ADT) compared to the land uses approved under the BECSP, which can be contributed to the reduced commercial square footage. Compared to existing conditions, the project would result in a less than significant increase in ADT. Mitigation Measures MM4.13-1 through MM4.13-18 require mitigation of the project's contribution to intersections and freeway ramp determined to be significantly impacted as a result of implementation of the BECSP through payment of fees that would provide the project's fair share toward improving those intersections. Although traffic impacts as a result of the proposed project would be less than significant, cumulative impacts would be significant and unavoidable for two BECSP study area intersections, including Caltrans intersections and one I-405 freeway ramp. The proposed project may contribute traffic to these intersections, the effects of which would result in a cumulatively significant impact when combined with development anticipated within the BECSP and surrounding areas. However, the proposed project's impacts on those intersections and freeway ramp determined to be deficient can be minimized through payment of fees that would contribute the project's fair share to improving those intersections. The EIR also analyzes the project's potential to create adverse impacts from inadequate parking capacity, alternative transportation policies and emergency access and determined these impacts to be less than significant. PC Staff Report— 12/13111 21 (l l sr5"rT., HB -243- Item 10. - 71 a Utilities The EIR analyzes potential impacts to water,wastewater, solid waste and other utility systems. The water lines associated with future development permitted under the proposed project are required to be sized appropriately for the anticipated design average day demand and appropriate peaking factors. It is anticipated that the increase in water demand would not result in necessary upgrades to the water treatment plants. The Water Supply Assessment concluded that under the worst case scenario to meet demand from projected population growth up to the year 2030, aggressive water conservation of up to 13.4 percent could balance supply and demand. Although the City has demonstrated significant water conservation over the last 10 years at approximately 8.6 percent, MM4.14-1 requires that projects include water conservation practices, until such time that additional savings from water conservation can be demonstrated or the water supply situation improves. The proposed project would have less than significant impacts. Implementation of the proposed project would require new sewer connections and construction of new or expanded wastewater conveyance systems pursuant to MM4.14-2. Construction or expansion of wastewater treatment facilities is not anticipated to be necessary to serve the proposed project's needs. The OCSD has adequate treatment capacity available over the long term to serve the proposed BECSP, including the proposed project. ARer natives to the Proposed Project CEQA guidelines require that an EIR describe a range of reasonable Alternatives to the project or the location of the project that could meet the objectives of the project and potentially reduce significant impacts of the project. Of note is that every conceivable Alternative scenario is not required but rather a range of feasible Alternatives must be included in the EIR so that the project can be adequately evaluated. An EIR need not consider an alternative whose effects could not be reasonably identified, and whose implementation is remote or speculative. The Alternatives are evaluated to see how well they can achieve the project objectives. Three Alternatives were evaluated in the Draft EIR and described below: Alternative 1: No Project/No Development Alternative - This alternative would serve as the "no development" alternative with the site remaining in its existing condition. Under this alternative all existing development and uses would remain. Alternative 2: All Commercial Alternative — Alternative 2 assumes that the site would be developed with 77,300 sf of commercial uses and a three-story parking structure. Commercial development would front Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue. Development would include a one- story, 22,500 sf market at the corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue, as well as a one-story, 5,000 sf restaurant on Beach Boulevard in the location of the existing restaurant. Two,three-story buildings consisting of approximately 16,600 sf of ground-floor retail uses and 33,200 sf of office uses on the upper two levels would be constructed along Ellis Avenue. A total of 7,700 sf of public open space would be provided on site in the form of an internal plaza area. Parking would be provided in a three-story, four-level (one level below grade, one level at grade, and two levels above grade), 240-space parking structure and a 48-space surface parking lot located along the southern boundary of the site. A total of 288 parking spaces would be provided on the site. Alternative 3 Increased Residential Mixed Use Alternative: Alternative 3 includes development of a mixed use project consisting of two building comprised of 274 apartment Item 10. - 72port-12/13/11 HB -244- (11sr57 EIR 10-004) dwelling units and 8,500 sf of commercial uses, as well as a 463-space, parking garage. Development along Beach Boulevard would be four stories in height, the remainder of the site would have development six stories in height. Residential development would include 7 live- work units, accessed directly from Ellis ,Avenue, as well as 25 studio units, 117 one-bedroom units, and 125 two bedroom units located on the upper levels of the development and accessed from the interior of the proposed building. Most of the residential dwelling units would be oriented around a courtyard located on the podium level(Level Two). Commercial uses would be located on the ground floor fronting Beach Boulevard. Parking would be provided in a 463-space parking garage located on the ground floor and on one subterranean level. Alternative 3 would include 16,000 sf of public open space in the form of an internal plaza area associated with the commercial uses, a courtyard on the podium level, and 16,020 sf of private open space, including dwelling unit balconies and patios. Other alternatives such as alternative locations and an all commercial development alternative were considered but rejected as infeasible because they would not achieve the project objectives and/or would not lessen significant impacts identified for the proposed project. Alternative Projects Impacts Overall, the No Project Alternative would result in the fewest number of impacts, and would eliminate significant and unavoidable impacts identified for the proposed project, but would not achieve any of the project objectives. Alternative 2 results in a significant and unavoidable impact for greenhouse gas emissions and doesn't meet objectives for a mixed use project. Because Alternative 3 would result in the development of an additional 169 residential units compared to the proposed project, increased demands associated with the increased residential population, including demands for public services, recreation as well as utilities would occur. These impacts would remain less than significant,but would be greater than the proposed project. Alternative 3 would not exceed anticipated daily traffic volumes identified for the BECSP under 2030 conditions but would generate a greater number of vehicle trips than the proposed project. Overall, the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions are greater for Alternative 3 than the proposed project, but on a per service population basis, the impacts to GHG emissions are less than the proposed project. Based on the analysis,the environmentally superior alternative would be Alternative 3. At the Study Session, Conu issioner Bixby asked how Alternative 3 could be the environmentally superior alternative when all the impacts except Greenhouse Gas are greater than or equal to the proposed project. Alternative 3 was selected because it achieves the project objectives, does not result in any new significant impacts, and on a per service population basis, GHG emissions would be less than the proposed project. While Alternative 2 would have reduced less than significant impacts for many issue areas, it would not eliminate the significant and unavoidable impacts identified for the proposed project, would not serve to achieve the City's vision for the site and results in a new significant and unavoidable impact for GHG. Certification of Final EIR The role of the Planning Commission is to certify the adequacy of the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project Environmental Impact Report. A development project is not before the Planning Commission for consideration at this time, but once submitted, the project will be evaluated against the certified EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines. PC staff Report— 12/13/11 HB -245- ("'rs'Item 10. - 73 ^ Public Comments on the Draft EIR and Errata Changes The City of Huntington Beach received a total of eight comment letters: four from state agencies, one from a private organization, two from individuals and one from the City's Environmental Board. Five verbal comments were received at the public meeting held during the comment period. In response to the comments received, the Final EIR and additional Errata includes text changes for the purpose of clarification or correction and additional analyses. The Errata do not change the overall conclusions of the FIR analysis. All of the other comments are adequately addressed in the Response to Comments. The Final EIR was distributed to the commenting agencies more than 10 days prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Any written communication received subsequent to the preparation of this staff report will be forwarded to the Planning Commission under separate cover. SUMMARY: Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004 serves as an informational document with the sole purpose of identifying potential environmental impacts associated with the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project, consider alternatives that minimize those impacts, and provide the appropriate mitigation measures. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission certify EIR No. 10-004 because: The EIR has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act; The EIR adequately addresses the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project; and s The EIR identifies project alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with the BECSP Program EIR and General Plan policies. AY I'ACI-IMENTS: XT Y1ing--C�er---3rd *10H 3. Additional Errata to the final EIR No. 10-004 SH:MBB:rm Item 10. - 74°r—12/13/11 HB -246- (11 sr57 EIR 10-004) ITY OF HUNTI ,BEACH AND ELLIS MIXED = USE PROJECT Errata to the Environmental Impact Report EIR No. 10-004 Prepared for City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department 2000 Main Street,Third Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 Prepared by Atkins 12301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 430 Los Angeles, California 90025 December 2011 xB -247- - ° ? " ...Item 10. - 75 ---- - s 0 The Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project was circulated for review and comment by the public, agencies, and organizations for a 45-day public review period that began on September 9, 2011, and concluded on October 24, 2011. A public information meeting to receive comments on the adequacy of the DEIR was held on October 6, 2011. In addition to five verbal comments from individuals that were received at the public meeting, seven comment letters were received during the review period from four state departments, one private organization, and two individuals. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines, a Final EIR was prepared for the proposed project, responding to each, of the comments received on the Draft EIR(DEIR). This was provided to staff and the City Planning Commission. On November 22, 2011, a Planning Conarnission Study Session was held to discuss the EIR (both Draft and Final). At that time, comments were received from the Planning Commission on the DEIR. Additionally, shortly after this meeting, it was noted that a comment letter from the City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board had been omitted accidentally. This Errata document has been prepared to address necessary changes to the DEIR as a result of the Planning Commission's comments, to correct typographical errors, and to include response to the Environmental Board's comment letter submitted on the DEIR No new significant impacts were identified during preparation of this Errata as a result of the additional information and comment letter. of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 1 Item 10. - 76 HB -248- INTRODUCTION Text changes are intended to clarify or correct information in the DEIR in response to comments received on the document, or as initiated by Lead Agency,staff. Revisions are shown in Section 8.2 (Text Changes) below as excerpts from the DEIR text,with a lifte 4htough deleted text and a double underline beneath inserted text. In order to indicate the location in the DEIR where text has been changed, the reader is referred to the page number of the DEIR. RESPONSES AND/OR TEXT CHANGES This section includes responses to requests for additional inforrnation or clarification and/or revisions to text that were initiated as a response to comments received by the Planning Commission. Page 2-11,Table 2-1 (Summary of Environmental Effects and Code Requirements/Mitigation Measures) Per the request for additional information and clarification on page 4.6-8, the following text change has been made to mitigation MM4.6-1 to clarify. ® © - - s ' Leve!of - - sig�cance 5rgnihcarace krrppd(s} Pforfa4gation m fgalionMeaswe(s)aiidloecodeRegurreamenfs' `;4flerM rgafro» Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact 4.6 Implementation of the LTS BECSP MM4.6-1 Prior to the issuance of grading LTS proposed project could create a potential permits on any project site, the site developer(s) significant hazard to the public or the shall: environment through reasonably ■ Investigate the project site to determine foreseeable upset and accident conditions whether it or immediately adjacent areas have involving the release of hazardous a record of hazardous material contamination materials into the environment However, via the preparation of a preliminary with implementation of mitigation,this environmental site assessment(ESA),which impact is considered less than significant. shall be submitted to the City for review.If contamination is found the report shall characterize the site according to the nature and extent of contamination that is present before development activities precede at that site. a if contamination is determined to be on site,the City,in accordance with appropriate regulatory agencies,shall determine the need for further investigation and/or remediation of the soils City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Proiect EIR ' HB -249- Item 10. - 77 • f - • • • - • • O O • - • - ts/Mitl• • r f .5ign�'cance S gr7icarmce lmpact(s) Prior io Mitigafion Mdigafian Measure(sj and/a Code Regbirernents': ei'H_I�igafion conditions on the contaminated site. If further investigation or remediation is required,it shall be the responsibility of the site developer(s)to complete such investigation and/or remediation prior to construction of the project. ■ If remediation is required as identified by the local oversight agency,it shall be accomplished in a manner that reduces risk to below applicable standards and shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy permits. Approval of a Human Health Rlsic Assessment pe t imed by the oroOct proponent may be required to ensure occupancy could occur Itely— ■ Closure reports or other reports acceptable to the Huntington Beach Fire Department that document the successful completion of required remediation acWties,ifarmy,or an approved active on site remediation system that has been approved by Orange�ourrtv Environmental Health Care Aaencv.for contaminated soils,in accordance with City Specification 431-92,shall be submitted and approved by the Huntington Bach Fire Department prior to the issuance of grading permits for site development.No construction shall occur in the affected area until reports have been accepted by the City. Page 2-22,Table 2-1 (Summary of Environmental Effects and Code Requirements/Mitigation Measures) e r - • a e - • r • r e - • • • e WIN - Level of Sigp Co 75ign�rcance trnpact(s) Prior to M17igc fop MWigafion Measure(s)and/or Code Req ents �4fie Mr7a'gahon Public Services Impact 4.11-3 Implementation of LTS BECSP CR4.11-1 The project Applicant shall pay all LTS the proposed project would not applicable development impact fees in effect at the time of require new or physically altered building permit issuance to the Ocean View School District to facilities to accommodate cover additional school services required by the new additional students and would be development These fees are currently$1.37 per square foot less than signr6cant (sf) of accessible interior space for any new residential unit and $0.22 per sf of covered floor space for new City of Huntington reach,Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR Item 10. - 78 xB -250- s � - ® o • a e a o o - o - - s • o - o - sign&ance 5gn cbr�ce fmpacf(s) Prforfo Moigaffon Mhigafion Mewwe(s)andAw Code 9e4uiremenis?' Atte[°Mfigalinii:' commerciallretail development. BECSP CR4.11-23 The Applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance to the Huntington Beach Union High School District to cover additional school services required by the new development.These fees are currently$2.97 per square foot (4 of accessible interior space for any new residential unit and $0.47 per sf of covered floor space for new commercialfretail development Page 4.6-12, mitigation measure BECSP MM4.6-1 The foliowing additional language has been added to mitigation measure MM4.6-1 to clarify. BECSP MM4.6-1 Prior to the issuance ofgrading permits on any project site, the site developers)shah ■ Investigate the project site to determine whether it or immediately adjacent areas have a record of ha..Zardous material contamination via the preparation of a preliminary 6mironmental site assessment(ESA), which shall be submitted to the City for review. If contamination is found the report shall characteri.Ze the site according to the nature and extent of contamination that is present before development activities precede at that site. s If contamination is determined to be on site, the City, in accordance with appropriate regulatory agencies, shall determine the need for further investigation and/or remediation o.f' the soils conditions on the contaminated site. If further investigation or remediation is required, it shall be the responsibility of the site *veloper(s)to complete such investigation and/or remediation prior to construction of the project. • If rernediation is required as identified by the local oversight agency, it shall be accomplished in a manner that reduces risk to below applicable standards and shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy permits A rnval of a Hurraan Health Risk A ssessrrzent erforrrzed the ect t rotwnent may be reauired to ensure oxoana could occur safe. • Closure reports or other reports acceptable to the Huntington Beach Firs Department that document the successful completion of required remediation activities, ;ar androved active on site remediation rMtem that has been airhroved by Oragge County Fnvirongnental Health Care Affenev, for contaminated soils, in accordance with City Specification 431-92, shall be submitted and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to the issuance of grading permits for site development No construction shall occur in the affected area until reports have been accepted by the City. City of Huntington Beach,Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Proiect E1R ` HB -251- Item 10. - 79 Page 4.8.4, "Building Height" section,third paragraph Although inconsistencies between the height of buildings and the BECSP Development Code have been identified, during the site plan review process revisions to the design of the proposed project would likely be required in an effort to achieve consistency with the BECSP, as is the case for all development occurring in the BECSP area. As such, site plan review approval would ensure that the proposed project would not conflict with the BECSP. Pages 4.11-18 and 4.11-14, last paragraph The Huntington Beach Public Library system currently has a full-time staff of 3726 Lwitl�potential to fill up t_tb ee exiting vaca_nciesl and approximately 100 part-time staff members (volunteers).83 The City does not have a library service ratio standard and uses the state's standard to determine the level of service for libraries. According to the State of California, there should be an average service ratio of approximately 0.00036 full-time employees per resident" This equates to {s�73 full-time library staff members in the Huntington Beach T'ubl c Library system based on resident p pulation}.84 As part-time staff members work on a volunteer basis, there is no full-time employee equivalent to their hours spent, and the approximate, 100 part-time staff members axe not considered when determining the need for full-time library staff members.Therefore,to currently meet the state standard of 73 full-time library staff members, the City of Huntington Beach would need to hire an additional 3642 full-time employees to serve the current population of 203,484. Implementation of the proposed project wau4d-e could result ia-280 additional residents to the City increasing the population to 203,764. This would not change the employee to staff ratio or the current need to hire additional 364Z full-time employees to meet the state standards. 13 .Steeyh?nie BQ=Ffe written-communication from Library Services DirPrtnr yanuary 31 011 . 83a Califomia Libraries Based on aveim9m service ratios of ten cities in Califarz�a 84 ratios of-tea eifies ift Galifb±iiia.Full firrte employees tequiT-�� .AMA d on 2010 1rfamia D artment of Fin_ ancepulation esti+�ate of 2fl3 484 for the City of Huntington}3each Full-time emtilovees requited fox total population: 0,00036 fa-time s aff/resident -203 484 residents = 73 fell-time st f rea i-ted Page 4.11-20, first paragraph following Impact 4.11-4 The closest library to the project site is the Oak View Branch Library approximately 1.25 miles northwest from the site. The Central Library and Cultural Center is located 1.5 miles northwest of the project site. The two libraries have an extensive collection which can meet the demands of future residents of the proposed project. Additionally, the project site,like all areas of the City,is served by all five branches of the Huntington Beach Public Library system. Combined, these libraries have a collection of 431,304 items. According to California Library Statistics, there should be an average service ratio of about 0.00036 full--time employees per resident. The Huntington Beach Public Library currently has a staff of 472,6 which does not meet this ratio. Based on the City's etttr -t--20.10 population of 203,484 residents, an additional 3642.full-time staff members would need to be hired in order to meet to this standard.The City of Huntinaton Beach,Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR Item 10. - 80 HB -252- p., - s m e - a •s - a proposed project would increase the population of Huntington Beach by a Of proximatelU 280 residents. This increase in population would not result in any additional need for the current need for 3641 fiAl-time staff members. Page 4.13-17,first paragraph The amount of parking provided on the project site would be designed to comply with the Parking Regulations established in BECSP Section 2.1.4 for the Town Center Neighborhood designation. This re ement includes 1 ar p e er 1 bedroom uni 1 5 parkin s aces er -be room unit o greater)- 2 est parking maces der 10 dwe lines units and a maximpn o 5 arking s acee/1 000 sf Qf commercial uses. All parking is proposed in a parking structure internal to the site, accessible from driveways on Beach Boulevard, der-EL5_Avenue and the existing private alleyway, as described above. Based on the y= sec ed project breakdown (54 1-bedroom units 36 2-bedroom uni s_ 15 3- b�,- ro m Units. and 37,000 sf of retaillcommercial uses), the proposed project would be_mQuited to ptovi e 152 residential parking spaces and 185 commercial space fo a total of 337 Harkin sp ces evel one would provide 109 retail parking spaces, Level two would provide 111 retail parking spaces, and Level three would provide 263 residential parking spaces for a total of 483 parking spaces.Pedestrian and vehicular circulation would be provided throughout the parking structure to the retail and residential uses. Page 6-41, before the last paragraph of the Transportation analysis As is the case for the proposed project, Alternative 3 would not substantially increase hazards due to design features or incompatible uses nor would Alternative 3 result in inadequate emergency access. .-. As such, impacts related to design hazards and emergency access have been determined to be less than significant-with compliance of existing regulations, consistent with the proposed project. The amount of arkin provided on the project site would be design d to comply with the Parkins Regulations es ablished in BECSP Section 21 4 fo the Town Center Neighborhood designation This requir to nt includes 1 parldng space per live work unit 1 parking s_�nace per studio unit 1 patlrina space per I bedroom unit 1.5 2 bedroom unit 2 guest pakitag space per 10 dwelli�, g unit parking a 1 0 mm Based .a e f n wo units unit 1-bedroom-units, -bedt000f retail f s r11te tiv3 smul d to deAAAarkin s would include a 463 �ace internal harking naraae which would meet thing requirements established by the BECSP. As Alternative 3 would be located on the same site as the proposed project which is located in close proximity to public transportation,is easily walkable to the Five Points shopping center,and is subject to the same design requirements included in the BECSP, Alternative 3 would promote and allows for the use of alternative transportation modes. Accordingly, Alternative 3 is compatible with adopted policies, plans and programs regarding alternative transportation; and this impact would be less than significan similar to the ptoposed project City of Huntington Beach,Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EiR -T HB -253- Item 10. - 81- COMMENTS ON THE DEIR City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board (EB), October 25, 2011 EB CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Ft B� ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD October 24,2011 Rosemary Made),Associate Planner City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Building 2000 Main St Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Subject Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Draft EIR No_10-004 Dear Ms.Medel; At the October 6,2011 Environmental Board meeting,the members reviewed the draft EIR No_ 10-0004.The Board offers the following comments for your consideration. General: We are pleased to see the City reposition this disinvested corridor property to capture value in the marketplace.The proposed project in conjunction with the other proposed projects contained in the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Pian(BECSP),will begin the transformation of Beach Boulevard into an iconic gateway to and from the beach;it is sorely EB-1 needed. The primary challenge for this particular project is transportation and mobility_ We agree that this property is in need of redevelopment,however,without site-specific transportation and mobility mitigations the City may be faced with a situation similar to Triangle Square in Costa Mesa Our specific comments on these and other challenges are found below. Additionally,we took notice that one of the Applicant's objecfroes is to incorporate Green Building practices into the project While we applaud that ot;jective,the subject document provides no detaft as to what specific practices will be included in the project. We would like to EB-2 see the Applicant list and describe what particular Green Building measures will be incorporated into the project design. Recreation: According to BECSP Section 2.6.1(Provision of Open Space),the proposed project is to provide a minimum of 7,100 square feet(sfj of public open space onsite.Public open space is defined as outdoor spaces that are accessdble to the public and include seating,lighting,and landscaping. The proposed project sets aside only 1,850 sf of public open space that is located on the comer of Beach and Ellis- The remaining 5250 sf must be satisfied by the Applicant £S_3 buying land off site or paying an in-lieu payment of the cost to construct the required amount of open space off site, The proposed public open space has several issues-its location and proposed mitigations. The 1,850 sf of public open space is situated directly on the comer of Beach and F lis-a City of Huntington Beach,Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 9 Item 10. - 82 Hs -254- r location that is near a 5-point intersection subject to high noise levels and vehicle emissions. Et1 -3 The location will not induce the public to utilize that open space and is therefore not suitable as Cont. a partial mitigation.Perhaps the public open space area could instead be public art rather than consider it public open space. Traffic: Mitigations-Under Year 2030 conditions,implementation of the proposed project could conflict with the City's acceptable level of service standard of D or-better. The EIR states that with the Applicant's fair share contributions toward future improvements in the area's roads,this would �� reduce project impacts to less than significant The reality is that the fair share contributions will mitigate traffic intersections other than Beach and Ellis. To be effective,mitigations should be constructed at or very near the proposed project and not somewhere else. We saw no discussions of improvements to the Beach and Ellis intersection in the document. As stated in the beginning of the letter,we do not want to see this project fail due to illusory and misdirected traffic mitigations. Ingress and Egress—It appears from the EIR's plans and specifications that Ingress northbound BB-5 from Beach into the parking area will create more traffic. One cannot see the angle at which a vehicle will tam and how wide It the ingress will be_Where will fire vehicles enter? Mobility-The proposed project location is situated very close to numerous senior living facilities in the Five Points area. These facilities provide transportation for seniors to the nearby shopping center and will likely take them to the proposed pro*ct's upscale market_Looking at EB-6 the plans and specifications,we do not see any ioadinglunloading curb cut-outs for those facility vehicles to pull in and drop-off the seniors.This could lead to back-ups at the Beach and Ellis intersection which Is already impacted by increased traffic. We appreciate the opportunity of reviewing this project. Please contact us with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Susan Gordon,Chair Huntington Beach Err ironmental Board k 30 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Projec` HB -255- _ Item 10. - 83 Q moll RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE DEIR 11 City of Huntington Beach Environmental Board (EB), October 25, 2011 EB-1 The comment expresses that the project and transformation of Beach Boulevard is needed and that the primary challenge of the proposed project is transportation and mobility, stating that site-specific transportation and mobility mitigations are necessary. Please refer to responses to specific comments and recommendations below. No further response is required. EB-2 This comment requests that a list and description of green building practices to be incorporated into project design be provided in the DEIR. The proposed project would be subject to BECSP Section 2.8.2-3 (Sustainability Requirements), which requires that all proposed new structures and/or site improvements incorporate sustainable building practices. In addition to these requirements, application of "Green Building" techniques such as those found in, but not limited to, the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System, the National Association of Homebuilders Model Green Home Building Guidelines and future "green building' ordinances and guidelines may be used. Specific green building practices that would be incorporated into project design are unknown at this time but will be established during the project's site plan review process undertaken by the City when compliance with the BECSP is ensured. As such, a list and description of green building practices has not been provided. Further, no reduction in project impacts was analyzed based on some level of green building technique provided. Finally, the request for this additional information is not a CEQA-specific issue, not is it a comment on the adequacy of the analysis provided in the DEIR.No further response is required. EB-3 The comment states that the location of the proposed 1,850 square feet(sf) of public open space located at the corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue would not induce the public to utilize the open space due to high noise levels and vehicle emissions associated with that intersection. The commenter concludes that the provision of on-site public open space is not suitable as partial mitigation to satisfy the open space requirements established by BECSP Section 2.6.1 and requests that the open space provided be public art instead. As stated on DEIR page 4.12-8: BECSP Section 2.6.1 (Provision of Public Open Space) requires the proposed project to provide public open space, deed as outdoor spaces that are accessible to the public and include seating, lighting and landscaping, at a rate of 50 sf for every 1,000 sf of retail use and for each residential dwelling unit—Based on the proposed square footage of retail use and the number of dwelling units, the proposed project is required to provide a minimum of 7,100 sf of public open space on site. The proposed project includes 1,850 sf of public open space located at the comer of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue.As such,an additional5,250 sf of public open space would be required to satisfy the requirements of BECSP of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 11 Item 10. - 84 HB -256- • • • F.T.M. s a - Section 2.6.1. The remaining public open space may be provided off-site, as permitted by BECSP Section 2.6.1(2)(v) or satisfied tbrough an in-lieu payment of the cost to construct the required amount of open space off site,as permitted by BECSP Section 2.6.1(2)(1v). Proposed public open space would be designed in conformance with BECSP Section 2.6.4 (Public Open Space Types), which identifies guidelines for design of the various types of public open space. BECSP Section 2.6.4 alloys for various types of public open space within the Town Center Neighborhood district, including a plaza. BECSP Section 2.6.4(4) defines a plaza as a public open space that is open to a public street on at least one side and should be located at the intersection of primary pedestrian routes. As such, public open space as proposed meets the definition of a plaza and is a suitable type of public open space on the project site. Addition y, the location of the proposed public open space would achieve the City's project objective to provide catalysts to the development of a network of pedestrian-oriented streets, promenades, and other public open spaces that encourage walking and ultimately, walking in combination with the transit ridership. As such, public open space provided on the project site as proposed is suitable to partially satisfy the BECSP requirement for public open space. The remaining 5,250 sf of public open space required would be provided off- site, as permitted by BECSP Section 2.6.1(2)(v) or satisfied through an in-lieu payment of the cost to construct the required amount of open space off site, as permitted by BECSP Section 2.6.1(2)(k). Therefore, no additional mitigation is necessary to meet BECSP public open space requirements for the project site and public art would not be provided at this time in-lieu of open space. No further response is required. EB-4 The comment states that the project applicant's fair share contribution toward future traffic improvements would not mitigate traffic impacts at Beach and Ellis and for mitigation to be effective, traffic improvements should be constructed at or near the proposed project,not somewhere else. As discussed on DEIR page 4.13-6, at build-out of the BECSP in 2030 the intersections of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue and Main Street and Ellis Avenue would operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS). Because the proposed project would result in a reduction of vehicle trips compared to land uses contemplated for the project site under the BECSP, the proposed project would not make worse intersection impacts identified in the BECSP EIR and traffic study, as explained beginning on DEIR page 4.13-10. Accordingly, no mitigation requiring improvements to the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue has been provided in this DEIR because this intersection and other nearby intersections are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS under Future (Year 2030) with project conditions without mitigation. EB-5 The comment expresses concerns that proposed ingress from northbound Beach Boulevard will create more traffic and questions where fire vehicles will access the project site. 12 Citt of H,infinriton Beach,Beach and Ellis Moved-Use Projei ' -'- HB -257- _ _ Item 10. - 85 Proposed access to the project site is shown in DEIR Figure 4.13-2. With implementation of the proposed project, access to the project site would be consolidated to one driveway on Beach Boulevard, one driveway on Ellis Avenue, and the existing private alleyway, all leading directly into the proposed internal parking structure.Although the number of access points to the project site would be reduced, as stated on DEIR page 4.13-16, "turning movements form Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue would remain substantially the same." As part of the proposed project, the private -alleyway (referred to in this comment) located along the east side of the project site would be improved to serve as a shared access driveway/fire lane. These improvements would ensure that fire vehicles would be able to maneuver safely.Additionally,design of the access points and the alley will be formally approved during the site plan review process undertaken by the City to ensure that unsafe conditions would not occut. EB-6 The comment states that the project plans and specifications do not identify loading/unloading curb cut-outs to accommodate pick-up and drop-off for seniors. The absence of these curb cuts could lead to backups at the intersection of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue which is already impacted by traffic. A loading area that could accommodate seniors and individuals with handicaps would be provided on the project site within the proposed parking structure, consistent with BECSP Section 2.7.3(1)(a) which requires access to parking facilities and loading areas to be provided from alleys or adjacent parking lots wherever possible. Loading areas would not be provided on adjacent streets.As such,backups at the Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue intersection would not occur as a result of loading and unloading areas on adjacent roadways. Design of this loading area will be formally approved during the site plan review process undertaken by the City to ensure that unsafe conditions would not occur. of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 13 Item 10. - 86 xB -258- '' ATTACHMENT #5 xfl -259- Item Ifl. - ft] 1/24/2012 EACH AND ELLIS MIXED USE PROJECT Environmental Impact Report No. I0-004 City Council meeting of - - February&, 2012 _u t Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Appellant: Mayor, Don Hansen REQUEST: EIR ® EIR No.10-004:Reviews and analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the `~ mG� mmm�m � mm Er is proposed Beach and EllisIwo _ J_ Mixed Use Project: --- O 105 Residential Units _ • 000 sf of on Mr. �7, an son On ccmmm ®�mm maam®mm Commercial Uses 9 1,85o sf Public Open Space - m 10,500 sf Residential Open Space 2.74 acre site 1 Item 10. - 88 HB -260- 1/24/2012 ROJECT SITE • The Beach and Ellis Mixed UseK � Project is located within the BECSP,SP i4,Town CenterON Neighborhood Segment. _,.,}a-u.:; ;ENtfi. �x • Features the City s widest r range of contemporary housing types. • Permits a wide mixture of � " uses. , • Emphasizes the pedestrian �� experience providing public . spaces and connectivity within walldng distance of the Five Points,Town Centex Core. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION o The Planning Commission failed to certify the EIR at the public hearing held on December 13, zoil due to a 3-3-1 vote. O There was only one speaker (property owner): • Traffic • Building Height • Affordable housing,will make a predominantly rental area worse as tenants are not as concerned as owners. H -261- Item 10. - 89 1/24/2012 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION • One appeal was filed: Mayor, Don Hansen • Reason_forAppeal To allow the City Council an opportunity to review and discuss the merits and adequacy of the EIR based on CEQA guidelines and goals of the City. EIR OVERVIEW • Beach and Ellis EIR is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR: • BECSP analyzed the development of izo units and 71,000 square feet of commercial for this site. • EIR provides a detailed analysis of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. • EIR determined that implementation of the proposed project would result in significant, unavoidable impacts in the following issue areas; Air Quality(construction related) • Transportation(cumulative only) • EIR serves as an information document,does not represent an approval of a project for development,and if certified the next step is submittal of a development application for review and approval under a separate action. 3 Item 10. - 90 HB -262- 1/24/2012 PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION ISSUES ® The Planning Commission discussed two primary issues, Traffic Impacts and Hazardous Remediation. • Theproposed project results in a 3o%decrease in AMpeak hours, 37%decrease in the PMpeak hours, and an overall 43 %trip reduction forADTcompared to land uses approved under the BECSP but would result in increases compared with the existing conditions. • In response to access and impacts on Ellis Avenue, all proposed development scenarios result in the consolidation of driveways and moving the main access points furtherfrom the main intersection of Beach BIvd. and Ellis Avenue. • Eliminating the gas station trips and relocating the access points farther from the intersection provide improved access,while minimizing the effects on through traffic on both Beach Blvd. and Ellis Ave. LANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION ISSUES (c®nt'd) • Issue related to on-site Hazardous remediation,grading a known contaminated site and eventual occupancy. • The EIR documents that in January zoo?the existing gas station and dry cleaning facility were identified to be ofpotential environmental concern.Dry cleaner's facility remediation was completed in zoio. • Site excavation beneath the gas station and cleaners sites will result in at least a partial removal of impacted soil, thus site development activities are likely to significantly reduce the extent of soil contamination. • Project would comply with HB Methane Overlay District requirements,which will effectively isolate the development from any remaining subsurface impacts to eliminate human health risks. • The current remediation efforts at the gas station are likely to continue for the foreseeable future; it is expected that building occupancy would be approved with the ongoing remediation. a HB -263- Item 10. - 91 1/24/2012 RECOMMENDATION o Certify Environmental Impact Report No. zo-ooq: based on the following: EIR has been prepared in accordance with CEQA EIR adequately addresses environmental impacts associated with the project • EIR identifies project alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen the projecfs impacts EN 5 Item 10. - 92 HB -264- COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED REGARDING AGENDA ITEM: Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 10-004 Reach and Ellis Mixed Use Project xB -265- Item 10. - 93 Friends -and Neighbors Please read read the attached "Notice of Public Hearing". THIS WILL IMPACT YOU! ® Increased Rents • No Paring No onshore breeze ® Major traffic congestions HOW? The owners of the property just south of us want to maximize their profit at our expense. They want to put a SIX story building on Ellis Ave across (south) from Patterson Lane. If you think traffic or parking are bad now the worst is yet to come! Do YOU enjoy that summer on-shore breeze? Just imagine what a SIX story wind block will do to it! They want to change the zoning from commercial to mixed! Lets keep the zoning what it is! YOUR SHOW OF SUPPORT Is NEEDED! Monday February 6' at 6:00 P.M. (please be there early say 5:45 P.M.) City Hall at 2000 Main St, by the HB Police Department in the bottom of the tower. I spoke up at the 12/13/11 meeting and they were marginally defeated in a vote of 3 yes' and 3 no's! A tie, they loose! THEY, � (the owners) are appealing The Planning Commission's decision. With ith YOUR Voice and Support, "WE", can put this monstrosity to rest! As a final note, they want to build on top of an environmental hazard, the SDELL Gas station holding tanks leave/are leaking into the surrounding soil. Can we afford the liability should the City of HD (deep pockets) later be held liable for allowing this building to move forward? This cost could be passed on by the City to the Landlords and then to the tenants through higher rents. TENNANTS DONT LET THIS HAPPEN! Please show up, and better yet sign up, at the meeting to voice your concerns and show support against this project! Any Questions: Steve Knight(714)313-8302 (PS: Sorry about the flier,I don't like them either!) Item 10. - 94 HB -266- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 6, 2012, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning Items: V1, APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO 10-004 (BEACH AND ELLIS MIXED USE PROJECT). Appellant: Mayor Don Hansen. Applicant: City of Huntington Beach. Property Owner: Morrie Golcheh, Progressive Property Management. Reguest: To review the environmental impacts associated with the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project to permit the development of 105 residential units, 37,000 square feet of retail space, and 483 parking spaces on 2.74 acres. The project improvements include the development of a six-story mixed use project with an internal parking structure allowing for retail along Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue at both the ground and second level with residential units above. Levels four through six accommodate the residential units and provide 10,500 square feet of residential open space. Additionally, 1,850 square feet of ground- level public open space is provided at the corner of Beach Blvd and Ellis Ave. The existing service station, restaurant and retail uses would be demolished as a result of this project. The project is located within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP), adopted in March 2010. Development on the project site was included in the Notice of Preparation for the BECSP EIR and analyzed as part of the larger scope of development contemplated in the BECSP EIR (Program EIR No. 08-008), which anticipated 120 residential units and 71,000 square feet of retail commercial including a two level health club for the subject property. As such, the analysis in Draft EIR No. 10-004 is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR where appropriate. Location: 18502-18552 Beach Blvd, 2.74-acre site located at the southeast comer of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue. Project Planner: Rosemary Medel ® 2. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO 09-002 (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Property owner: Not Applicable Reguest: To amend Section 230.96 (Wireless Communication Facilities) of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by revising the citywide permitting and entitlement process for wireless communication facilities (e.g. cell phone antennas and towers) as well as other provisions of the current ordinance. Location: Citywide Project Planner: Ricky Ramos NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection by contacting the Department, or telephoning (714) 536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item#2 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item#2 will require a Local Coastal Program Amendment certified by the California Coastal Commission. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, February 2, 2012. 020612 Appeal EIR No 10-004(Beach Ellis Mixed Use Project)ZTA 09-002(Wireless Ord) HB -267- Item 10. - 95 ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at(714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 httv://hunting onbeachea.gov/BBPublicComments/ b.tt ://www.huntingtonb eachca.Gov/ 020612 Appeal EIR No 10-004(Beach Elvis Mixed Use Project)ZTA 09-002(Wireless Ord) Item 10. - 96 xB -268- City Of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ♦ Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 ® www.huntingtonbeachca.gov �g.tz,,eoe,a� � Office of the City Clerk ` .Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk NOTICE OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL Appeal of Planning Commission Decision, Public Works Commission Decision or Police Department Decision/Action Date: 12/16/11 To: Planning Department City Attorney City Council Office Administration Public Works Department Police Department(only if Police related item) Filed by: Mayor Don Hansen Re: Planning Commission Denial of EIR No. 10-004(Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project) Date for Public Hearing: TBD Copy of appeal letter attached: Yes Fee collected: n/a Completed by: Rebecca Ross, Senior Deputy City Clerk15� I A\ V LEGAL NOTICE AND MAILING LABELS MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 15 DAYS PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING DATE Sister Cities: Anjo,Japan ♦ Waitakere, New Zealand 0 s " CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH City Council Interoffice Communication TO: Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk FROM: Don Hansen, Mayo DATE: December 14, 2 1 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-004 (BEACH AND .ELLIS MIXED USE PROJECT) I hereby appeal the Planning Commission's denial of the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project EIR No. 10-004. On December 13, 2011, the Planning Commission failed to certify the EIR with a 3- 3-1 vote. The primary reason for my appeal is to allow the City Council an opportunity to review the EIR on the merits of its analysis. Pursuant to Section 248.18 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, the City Council shall hear an appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission. SH:MBB:rm , cc: City Council Members Chair and Planning Commission ., Fred A.Wilson, City Manager Bob Hall, Deputy City Manager Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building Travis Hopkins, Director of Public Works Herb Fauland, Planning Manager Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager Robin Lugar, Deputy City Clerk Rosemary Medel,Associate Planner Kim De Coite,Administrative Assistant g:admn1M2011\020411 to 1 COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED REGARDING AGENDA ITEM: Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 10-004 Reach and Ellis Mixed Use Project r Friends and Neighbors PA//.�­ Please read the attached "Notice of Public Dearing". THIS WILL IMPACT YOU! • Increased Rents = • No Parking • No on-shore breeze • Major traffic congestion HOW? The owners of the property just south of us want to maximize their profit at our expense. They want to put a SIX story building on Ellis Ave across (south) from Patterson Lane. If you think traffic or parking are bad now the worst is yet to come! Do YOU enjoy that summer on-shore breeze? Just imagine what a SIX story wind block will do to it! They want to change the zoning from commercial to mixed! Lets keep the zoning what it is! YOUR SHOW OF SUPPORT IS NEEDED! Monday February 6' at 6:00 P.M. ( please be there early say 5:45 P.M.) City Hall at 2000 Main St, by the HE Police Department in the bottom of the tower. I spoke up at the 12/13/11 meeting and they were marginally defeated in a vote of 3 yes' and 3 no's! A tie, they loose! THEY, (the owners) are appealing The Planning Commission's decision. With YOUR Voice and Support, "WE", can put this monstrosity to rest! As a final note, they want to build on top of an environmental hazard, the SHELL Gas station.holding tanks havelare leaking into the surrounding soil. Can we afford the liability should the City of BB (deep pockets) later be held liable for allowing this building to move forward? This cost could be passed on by the City to the Landlords and then to the tenants through higher rents. TENNANTS DONT LET THIS HAPPEN! Please show up, and better yet sign up, at the meeting to voice your concerns and show support against this project! Any Questions: Steve .Knight (714) 313-8302 (PS: Sorry about the flier, I don't like them either!) 44 / d NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 6, 2012, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-004 (BEACH AND ELLIS MIXED USE PROJECT). Appellant: Mayor Don Hansen. Applicant: City of Huntington Beach. Property Owner: Morrie Golcheh, Progressive Property Management. Request: To review the environmental impacts associated with the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project to permit the development of 105 residential units, 37,000 square feet of retail space, and 483 parking spaces on 2.74 acres. The project improvements include the development of a six-story mixed use project with an internal parking structure allowing for retail along Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue at both the ground and second level with residential units above. Levels four through six accommodate the residential units and provide 10,500 square feet of residential open space. Additionally, 1,850 square feet of ground- level public open space is provided at the corner of Beach Blvd and Ellis Ave. The existing service station, restaurant and retail uses would be demolished as a result of this project. The project is located within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP), adopted in March 2010. Development on the project site was included in the Notice of Preparation for the BECSP EIR and analyzed as part of the larger scope of development contemplated in the BECSP EIR (Program EIR No. 08-008), which anticipated 120 residential units and 71,000 square feet of retail commercial including a two level health club for the subject property. As such, the analysis in Draft EIR No. 10-004 is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR where appropriate. Location: 18502-18552 Beach Blvd, 2.74-acre site located at the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue. Project Planner: Rosemary Medel ® 2. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 09-002 (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Property Owner: Not Applicable Request: To amend Section 230.96 (Wireless Communication Facilities) of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by revising the citywide permitting and entitlement process for wireless communication facilities (e.g. cell phone antennas and towers) as well as other provisions of the current ordinance. Location: Citywide Project Planner: Ricky Ramos NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection by contacting the Department, or telephoning (714) 536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item#2 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #2 will require a Local Coastal Program Amendment certified by the California Coastal Commission. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, February 2, 2012. 020612 Appeal EIR No 10-004(Beach Ellis Mixed Use Project)ZTA 09-002(Wireless Ord) ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/IIBPublicComments/ hitP://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/ 020612 Appeal EIR No 10-004(Beach Ellis Mixed Use Project)ZTA 09-002(Wireless Ord) CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: N MEETING DATE: CONTACT: 1 yl c- � PHONE: fig `-t N/A YES NO Is the notice attached? ( ) O Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council(and/or Redevelopment Agency)hearing? Are the date,day and time of the public hearing correct? ( ) ( ) If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice? If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language? Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? ( ) ( ) ( Is a map attached for publication? ( ) ( ) ( 41`�Is a larger ad required? Size Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? ( ) ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) (4,�e the appelant's name and address part of the mailing labels? If Coastal Development Permit,is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? If Coastal Development Permit,are the Resident labels attached? ( ) ( ) Is the33343 report attached? (Economic Development Dept. items only) Please complete the following: 1. Minimum days from publication to hearing date J d 2. Number of times to be published 3. Number of days between publications --� — Printed by:OM Patricia Gamino Jan 19,2012,11.48 am goo duQcuS' 1 Phone: '- Ad#34800349 P Oti13#'K,(714)536-52, 7 Stott abet 01-26-12 �2 x 99.410 1. 'r t�atFle.: City Of Huntington Beach(Parent) ev 01-26-12 illedstze 10.00 TCN Inch Address PO Box 784 111 settionst, 1 lGaywor+d - Huntington Beac,CA 92648-0784 :AW 6,Wi0&Legal Huntington Beach (' 11dType Multi-Column Liner �a c: ,- a Xakenby:0602 Patricia Gamuto . J3fcCt#'�CUW07IX79 ClilSS 13000-Legal Notices ��— K, (31pSS $160.00 ? TCN HBI ``i Cl18nt:t City of Huntington Beach-Planning f - may, $160 00 Attltl3tae� $160 00 L Patty Esparza ti tlo �'AmoufQu Fex f! (714)374-1657 i ctrangs dud m i Gnt� �n =l t Ad Copy: NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCd,OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 6, 2012, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-004 (BEACH AND ELLIS MIXED USE PROJECT). Appellant: Mayor Don Hansen. Applicant: City of Huntington Beach. Property Owner: Morrie Golcheh, Progressive Property Management.Request:To review the environmental impacts associated with the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project to permit the development of 105 residential units,37,000 square feet of retail space, and 483 parking spaces on 2.74 acres.The project improvements include the development of a six- story mixed use project with an internal parking structure allowing for retail along Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue at both the ground and second level with residential units above. Levels four through six accommodate the residential units and provide 10,500 square feet of residential open space. Additionally, 1,850 square feet of ground- level public open space is provided at the corner of Beach Blvd and Ellis Ave. The existing service station, restaurant and retail uses would be demolished as a result of this project.The project is located within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP), adopted in March 2010. Development on the project site was included in the Notice of Preparation for the BECSP EIR and analyzed as part of the larger scope of development contemplated in the BECSP EIR (Program EIR No. 08-0D8), which anticipated 120 residential units and 71,000 square feet of retail commercial including a two level health club for the subject property. As such, the analysis in Draft EIR No. 10-004 is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR where appropriate. Location: 18502-18552 Beach Blvd,2.74-acre site located at the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue. Protect Planner.Rosemary Medel ❑ 22ONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 09-002 (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Property Owner:Not Applicable Request:To amend Section 230.96(Wireless Communication Facilities) of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by revising the citywide permitting and entitlement process for wireless communication facilities(e.g. cell phone antennas aad t6w'ers)'as weft as athar provisions of the current ordinance. Location: Citywide Project Planner:Ricky Ramos NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004 is on file at the City of Hontinelon Beach Planning and Building — ad proof pg.1 --- `ziwfie lie Printed by:0602 Patricia Gamin Ja - - an 19.2012,11;48 am ) QC11Mw 5awesperson: 11 gash Phone: Ad 8 34NO345 — Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available - ` for ptiblic'inspection by contacting the Department, or telephoning(714)536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #2 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item#2 will require a local Coastal grogram Amendment certified by the California Coastal Commission. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 20M Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, February 2, 2012. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Joan L.Flynn,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 20DO Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Reach,California 92648 (714)536.5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPublicComments/ hftp://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/ Published Huntington Beach Independent January 26,2012 --- ad proof pg,2 - NOTICE OF.PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 6, 2012, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-004 (BEACH AND ELLIS MIXED USE PROJECT). Appellant: Mayor Don Hansen. Applicant: City of Huntington Beach. Property Owner: Morrie Golcheh, Progressive Property Management. Request: To review the environmental impacts associated with the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project to permit the development of 105 residential units, 37,000 square feet of retail space, and 483 parking spaces on 2.74 acres. The project improvements include the development of a six-story mixed use project with an internal parking structure allowing for retail along Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue at both the ground and second level with residential units above. Levels four through six accommodate the residential units and provide 10,500 square feet of residential open space. Additionally, 1,850 square feet of ground- level public open space is provided at the corner of Beach Blvd and Ellis Ave. The existing service station, restaurant and retail uses would be demolished as a result of this project. The project is located within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan (BECSP), adopted in March 2010. Development on the project site was included in the Notice of Preparation for the BECSP EIR and analyzed as part of the larger scope of development contemplated in' the BECSP EIR (Program EIR No. 08-008), which anticipated 120 residential units and 71,000 square feet of retail commercial including a two level health club for the subject property. As such, the analysis in Draft EIR No. 10-004 is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR where appropriate. Location: 18502-18552 Beach Blvd, 2.74-acre site located at the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue. Proiect Planner: Rosemary Medel ® 2. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 09-002 (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES) Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Property Owner: Not Applicable Request: To amend Section 230.96 (Wireless Communication Facilities) of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance by revising the citywide permitting and entitlement process for wireless communication facilities (e.g. cell phone antennas and towers) as well as other provisions of the current ordinance. Location: Citywide Proiect Planner: Ricky Ramos NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection by contacting the Department, or telephoning (714) 536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #2 is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #2 will require a Local Coastal Program Amendment certified by the California Coastal Commission. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, February 2, 2012. 020612 Appeal EIR No 10-004(Beach Ellis Mixed Use Project)ZTA 09-002(Wireless Ord) ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 hgp:Hhuntingtonbeachca.g6v/HBPublicComments/ http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/ 020612 Appeal EIR No 10-004(Beach Ellis Mixed Use Project)ZTA 09-002(Wireless Ord) NOME OF PUBIK HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ®®� ®� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY. GIVEN that on Monday, �'�AT I®N I February 6, 20 at St PM in the City Council Ir"UBChambers, 20000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑l.APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S AP- PROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-004 (BEACH AND ELLIS MIXED USE CALIFORNIA) PROJECT), Appellant: Mayor Don Hansen. Ap- plicant:OF CR owner: City of Huntington Beach. Property Owner: Morrie Golcheh,. Progressive Property Management. Request:To review the environmen- tal impacts associated with the Beach and Ellis Se Mixed Use Project to permit the development of COUNTY ®� ®RANGE ) spa residential units, g spaces square feet acres.-The space, and 483 parking spaces on 2.74 acres.The project improvements include the development of a six-story mixed use project with an internal parking,structure allowing for retail along Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue at both the ground am a citizen of the United States and a and second,level with residential units above. Levels four through six accommodate the residen- resident of the County of Los Angeles; I tial units and provide 10,500 square feet of residential open space. Additionally, 1,850 square am over the age of eighteen years, and feet of ground-level public open space is provided at the corner of Beach Blvd and Ellis Ave. The not a party to or interested in the notice existing service station, restaurant and retail uses would be demolished as a result of,this project. published. I am a principal clerk of the The project is located within the Beach and Edinger Corridors Specific Plan(BECSP),adopted in March HUNTINGTON BEACH 2O10. Development on the project, site was included in the Notice of Preparation for the- INDEPENDENT; °which was adjudged a BECSP EIR and analyzed as part of the larger scope of development contemplated in the BECSP newspaper of general circulation on EIR (Program EIR No. 08-008), which anticipated 120 residential units and 71,000 square feet of September 29, 1961, case A6214, and retail commercial including,a two level health club for the subject property. As such, the analysis in June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the Draft EIR No: 10-004 is tiered from the BECSP Program EIR where appropriate. Location: 18502- Clty of Huntington Beach, County of 18552 Beach Blvd, 2.74-acre site located at the southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Orange, and the State of California. Avenue.Project Planner:Rosemary Medel ' g ❑ 22ONING TEXT AMENDMENT N0. 09-002 Attached to this Affidavit Is a true and (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES) Ap- Mant:.City of Huntington Beach Property Own- complete copy, as was printed and er: Not Applicable Request:To amend Section 230.96 (Wireless Communication Facilities) of the published on the following date(s): Huntington Beach.Zoning and Subdivision Ordi- nance by revising the citywide permitting and entitlement process for wireless communication facilities (e.g. cell phone antennas and towers) as Thursday, January 26, 2012 12 well as other provisions of the current ordinance. Location:Citywide Project Planner:Ricky,Ramos NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach.Planning and Building Depart= ment,2000 Main Street,and is available for public certify (or declare) under penalty inspection by contacting the Department, or telephoning(714)536-5271. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #2 is of perjury that the foregoing is true categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. and Correct. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item#2 will require a Local Coastal Program Amendment certified by the California Coastal Commission. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main iStreet, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff Executed on February 9, 2012 report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, February 2, at Los Angeles, California 2012. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said .hearing and express opinions or submit: evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you.challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in. this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at orf prior to, the public hearing. If there are any-further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the Signature above items. Direct"your written communications to the City Clerk ' loan L.Flynn,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach. 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPubiicComments/ http://www.huntingtonbeachc4.gov/ Published Huntington Beach Independent January 26 2012 ; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. P R O O F O F NOTICE IS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, February 6, 2012, at 6:00 PM in the City Council 0 U 1 LI INTI O N Chambers,Council Main Street, Huntington Beach, , 1� the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑1.APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S AP- PROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-004 (BEACH AND ELLIS MIXED USE PROJECT). Appellant: Mayor Don Hansen. ,Ap- /�e ® p Ap- plicant: City of )iuntington Beach. Property STATE O� CALIFORNIA) Owner: Morrie Golcheh, Progressive Property Management.,Request:To review the environrn tal impacts associated with the Beach .and Ellis SSa Mixed Use Project,to permit the development of I COUNTY �/ p� C 105 residential units, 37,000,square feet of retail COUNT I OF ORANGE NGE ) space, and rov parking spaces he development acres.The Pl/�! 'project improvements include the development of a six-story mixed'use project with an internal parking structure allowing for retail along Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue at.both the ground and second level with residential units above. am a citizen of the United States and a Levels four through six accommodate the residen- tial units and provide 10,500 square feet of resident of the County of Los Angeles; I residential open space. Additionally, 1,850 square II feet of ground-level public open space is provided , am over the age of eighteen years, and at the corner of Beach Blvd and Ellis Ave. The , existing service station, restaurant and retail uses not a party to or interested in the notice would be demolished as a result of this project. The project is located within the Beach and Edinger published. I am a principal clerk of the Corridors Specific Plan(BECSP),adopted in March 2010. Development on the project site was HUNTINGTON BEACH included in the Notice of Preparation for the BECSP EIR and analyied as part of the larger INDEPENDENT;: which was,adju ge a scope of development contemplated in the BECSP EIR (Program EIR No. 08-008), which,anticipated. newspaper of general circulation on 120 residential units and.71,000 square feet o retail commercial including a two level health club September 29, 1961, case A6214, and for the subject property. As such, the analysis in Draft EIR No. 10-004 is tiered from the BECSP i June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the Program EIR where appropriate`. Location: 18502- 18552 Beach Blvd, 2.74-a6re site located at the City of Huntington Beach, County of . southeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis- Avenue:Project Planner:Rosemary'Medel Orange; and the State of California. ❑ 22ONING TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 09-002 (WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES) Ap- Attached to this Affidavit is a true and I plicant: City.of Huntington Beach Property Own- ;or: Not Applicable Request: To amend'Section i complete. copy as was printed and 230.96 (wireless Communication Facilities) of the Huntington .Beach Zoning and.Subdivision Ordi- published on the following date(s): nance by revising the citywide permitting and entitlement process for wireless communication facilities (e.g. cell phone antennas and towers)as Thursday January 26 2012 well as other provisions of the current ordinance. 9 9 Location:Citywide Project Planner:Ricky Ramos NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Depart- ment,2000 Main Street,andis available for public inspection by contacting' the Department, or certify (or declare) under penalty telephoning(714)536-5271. o NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item #2 is f perjury that the foregoing is true categorically exempt from the provisions of.the California Environmental Quality Act. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item#2`will require and correct. a Local Coastal Program Amendment certified by the California Coastal Commission. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington.Beach, California 92648, j for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available*to interested parties at Executed on February 9, 2012 the City Clerks office on Thursday, February 2, 2012. at Los Angeles, California ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express' opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be.limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written /1 correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior. `J{ to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department.at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the Signatureabove items. Direct your-written communications to the City Clerk Joan L.Flynn,City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648.. (714)536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPub IicComments/ http://www.huntingtonbeachca.g6v/ Published'Huntington Beach Independent January 26,2012 091-8/09 LS®Aaany oaAe algljedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z jewjoj ap a;anblj3 091-8/09 LSo laany qj!M @Igljedwoo„9/9 Z x,,L azls lagel 932-880-11 932-880-10 932-880-09 Otto Sharon R Trust&Murray Ellen L Occupant Ball Pamela 18713 Applewood Cir 18721 Applewood Cir 18723 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1856 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1855 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1855 932-880-08 932-880-07 932-880-06 Juy Juan Alberto Nadolski Charles Holtzman Luke 18731 Applewood Cir 18733 Applewood Cir 18741 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1855 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1855 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1855 932-880-05 159-031-01 157-352-05 Pannell Rodney Occupant Occupant 18743 Applewood Cir 18255 Beach Blvd 18302 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92646-1855 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1351 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 157-352-05 157-352-05 157-352-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18310 Beach Blvd 18312 Beach Blvd 18314 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 157-352-05 157-352-05 157-352-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18316 Beach Blvd 18318 Beach Blvd 18320 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 157-352-05 157-352-05 157-341-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18322 Beach Blvd 18330 Beach Blvd 18344 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 157-341-01 157-341-01 157-341-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18346 Beach Blvd 18348 Beach Blvd 18350 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18351 Beach Blvd Unit A 18351 Beach Blvd Unit B 18351 Beach Blvd Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92648-1346 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1346 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1346 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18351 Beach Blvd Unit D 18351 Beach Blvd Unit E 18351 Beach Blvd'Unit F Huntington Beach CA 92648-1346 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1347 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1347 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18351 Beach Blvd Unit G 18351 Beach Blvd Unit H 18351 Beach Blvd Unit I Huntington Beach CA 92648-1347 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1347 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1348 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 /i�/� Etiouette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09l-8/09 i9®Aaany oaAe algi}edwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z juwjo}ap ajqanblt3 09 f e/09190laaAV Ujinn aigijedwoo„g/g Z x<<L azis lag-el 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18351 Beach Blvd Unit J 18351 Beach Blvd Unit K 18351 Beach Blvd Unit L Huntington Beach CA 92648-1348 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1348 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1348 157-341-01 157-341-01 157-341-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18352 Beach Blvd 18354 Beach Blvd 18356 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 157-341-01 157-341-01 159-031-22 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18358 Beach Blvd 18360 Beach Blvd 18361 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1310 157-341-01 157-341-02 930-034-35 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18362 Beach Blvd 18364 Beach Blvd 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 100 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 930-034-36 930-034-37 930-034-38 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 102 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 103 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 104 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 930-034-39 930-034-40 930-034-41 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 105 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 106 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 108 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 930-034-42 930-034-43 930-034-44 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 208 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 209 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 210 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 930-034-45 930-034-46 930-034-47 Occupant Occupant Thomas Keith 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 211 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 212 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 214 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 930-034-48 930-034-49 930-034-50 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 215 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 216 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 219 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1349 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 930-034-51 930-034-52 930-034-53 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 220 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 222 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 322 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 �6�/� kiouette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09 G8/09150 Aaany MAE algljedwoo ww Lg x ww 53}ewaol ap 91janbp] ° 4 0918/091-5®[umV U�IAA algl}edwoo„8/g Z x,,l azis lagel 930-034-54 930-034-55 930-034-56 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 323 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 324 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 325 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 930-034-57 930-034-58 930-034-59 Van Dyke Adam Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 326 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 327 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 328 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 930-034-60 930-034-61 930-034-62 Occupant Occupant Viefhaus&Schneider Llp/Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 329 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 330 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 331 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1350 Huntington Beach CA 92648-5694 930-034-63 157-341-03 157-341-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18377 Beach Blvd Unit 333 18382 Beach Blvd 18400 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-5694 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1311 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1312 159-031-08 159-031-08 159-031-08 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18421 Beach Blvd 18423 Beach Blvd 18423 Beach Blvd Unit 1/2 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1329 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1329 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1329 159-031-08 159-031-08 159-031-17 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18425 Beach Blvd 18429 Beach Blvd 18455 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-1329 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1329 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1329 157-341-06 159-031-10 159-102-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18462 Beach Blvd 18477 Beach Blvd 18501 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-1312 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1329 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2053 157-471-05 157-471-05 157-471-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18502 Beach Blvd 18502 Beach Blvd Unit 101 18510 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-2017 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 157-471-04 157-471-04 157-471-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18512 Beach Blvd 18514 Beach Blvd 18516 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 157-471-04 157-471-04 157-471-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18518 Beach Blvd 18520 Beach Blvd 18522 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 /i /i I— Ftinnatte dp.fnrmat 25 mm x 67 mm comoatible avec Avery 215160/8160 091.8/09150 Aaany oane algljedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z Iewaol ap a.�anbn3 0918/09 G5®faany qj!m algijedwoo<,9/9 Z x j azls lagel 157-471-04 157-471-04 157-471-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18524 Beach Blvd 18526 Beach Blvd 18528 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 157-471-04 157-471-04 157-471-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18530 Beach Blvd Unit 204 18530 Beach Blvd Unit 205 18530 Beach Blvd Unit 206 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 157-471-04 157-471-04 157-471-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18530 Beach Blvd Unit 207 18530 Beach Blvd Unit 208 18530 Beach Blvd Unit 209 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 157-471-04 157-471-04 157-471-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18532 Beach Blvd 18534 Beach Blvd 18536 Beach Blvd` Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 157-471-04 157-471-04 159-102-43 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18538 Beach Blvd 18540 Beach Blvd 18541 Beach Blvd Unit 101 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-8002 159-102-43 157-471-04 157-471-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18541 Beach Blvd Unit 102 18542 Beach Blvd 18544 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-8002 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 157-471-04 157-471-04 157-471-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18546 Beach Blvd 18548 Beach Blvd 18552 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2018 159-102-43 159-102-43 159-102-43 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Beach Blvd 18575 Beach Blvd 18581 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 1 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 10 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 11 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2029 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2029 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2071 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 12 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 121 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 13 Huntington Beach CA 926481-2083 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2029 C(Z label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 (��j� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0918/09l•go faany oaAa elgl}edwoo ww ig x ww gZ jewaoj ap 9janbl13 0918/09 G5o AaaAV qj!m aigi}edwoo„9/9 Z x,j azis lapel 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 14 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 15 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 16 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 17 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 18 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 19 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 1A 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 1B 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2029 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2029 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2029 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 20 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 201 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 202 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 203 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 204 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 205 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2081 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2081 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2081 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 206 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 207 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 208 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2081 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2081 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2081 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 209 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 21 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 210 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2081 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2043 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 211 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 212 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 213 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2043 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2043 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2043 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 215 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 216 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 218 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2043 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2082 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2082 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 22 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 223 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 224 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2082 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2082 020 -R / —00`� label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 1 ' // //z biouette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09 G2/09 t So,AIGAV Dane alglIedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ iewaoj ap ail9nbiI3 a. 0918/09L9®tiaAy u}Inn aigljedwoo«8/9 z x«L azls lapel 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 225 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 226 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 229 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2093 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2093 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2063 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 23 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 230 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 231 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2063 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2063 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 232 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 233 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 235 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2063 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2063 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2063 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 236 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 239 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 23B Huntington Beach CA 92648-2063 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2063 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 240 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 26 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2063 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2029 157-471-06 157-471-06 157-471-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 8A 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 8B 18582 Beach Blvd Unit 9 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2029 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2029 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2029 159-102-43 159-102-43 159-102-43 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18583 Beach Blvd 18585 Beach Blvd 18595 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 159-102-43 159-102-43 157-471-31 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18607 Beach Blvd 18631 Beach Blvd 18632 Beach Blvd Unit 100 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2047 157-471-31 157-471-31 157-471-31 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18632 Beach Blvd Unit 115 18632 Beach Blvd Unit 205 18632 Beach Blvd Unit 210 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2047 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2046 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2046 157-471-31 157-471-31 157-471-31 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18632 Beach Blvd Unit 215 18632 Beach Blvd Unit 220 18632 Beach Blvd Unit 225 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2046 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2046 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2046 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with 4ery°5160/8160 bimiatte de format 25 mm x 67 mm comoatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09 i8/09 1-5o�aany NAe algljedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z jewaoi ap ajqanblt3 0 09[2/0919e AaaAV qj!m algitedwoo„g/5 Z x<<l azls lagel 157-471-31 157-471-31 157-471-31 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18632 Beach Blvd Unit 230 18632 Beach Blvd Unit 235 18632 Beach Blvd Unit 240 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2047 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2047 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2047 159-102-43 159-102-43 159-102-43 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18635 Beach Blvd 18637 Beach Blvd 18639 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 159-102-43 159-102-06 159-102-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18645 Beach Blvd 18649 Beach Blvd 18665 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92648-2054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2003 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2003 157-452-34 157-471-31 157-471-31 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 100 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 110 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 130 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2049 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2049 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2004 157-471-31 157-471-31 157-471-31 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 140 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 150 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 160 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2050 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2050 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2077 157-471-31 157-471-31 157-471-31 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 165 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 200 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 205 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2076 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2051 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2051 157-471-31 157-471-31 157-471-31 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 210 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 215 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 225 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2051 Huntington.Beach CA 92648-2051 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2079 157-471-31 157-471-31 157-471-31 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 230 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 235 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 250 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2078 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2052 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2052 157-471-31 157-471-30 157-471-30 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18682 Beach Blvd Unit 255 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 110 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 115 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2052 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2091 Huntington Beach CA 92648-8006 157-471-30 157-471-30 157-471-30 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 120 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 130 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 140 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2089 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2089 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2089 /D label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 • //- /i 2 biouette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery/55160/8160 09 L8/0919®faany Dane algpedwoo ww Lg x ww 9z lewao}op 9;;9nbl13 09 G2/09 L9®fiaany q}Inn algp3dwoo„9/g Z x«L azls lapel 157-471-30 157-471-30 157-471-30 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 150 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 160 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 200 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2089 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2073 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2090 157-471-30 157-471-30 157-471-30 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 201 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 205 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 215 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2090 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2090 Huntington Beach CA 92648-8007 157-471-30 157-471-30 157-471-30 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 220 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 225 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 230 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2090 Huntington Beach CA 92648-8008 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2072 157-471-30 157-471-30 157-471-30 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 240 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 250 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 255 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2006 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2074 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2084 157-471-30 159-102-08 157-451-09 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Beach Blvd Unit 260 18711 Beach Blvd 18742 Beach Blvd Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92648-2075 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2005 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2064 157-451-09 157-451-09 157-451-09 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18742 Beach Blvd Unit B 18742 Beach Blvd Unit C 18742 Beach Blvd Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92648-2064 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2064 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2064 157-451-01 157-451-01 157-451-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18742 Beach Blvd Unit E 18742 Beach Blvd Unit F 18742 Beach Blvd Unit G Huntington Beach CA 92648-2064 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2064 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2064. 157-451-01 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18742 Beach Blvd Unit H 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 1 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2064 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1492 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1492 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 3 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 4 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 5 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1469 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1469 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1469 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 6 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 7 7872 Beachpoint Cir Bldg C Unit 8 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1469 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1469 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1491 /0—OOT label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09 L8/09 Lg©/aany Dane algijedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ iewaoj ap a1anbi13 09 L8/09 Lgo AAAV Minn alggedwoo,,8/g Z x«L azis lagei 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 1 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 10 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 11 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1470 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1472 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1472 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 12 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 14 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 15 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1473 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1473 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1473 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 16 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 17 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 18 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1474 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1474 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1474 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 19 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 2 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 20 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1474 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1470 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1474 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7981 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 21 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 3 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1474 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1470 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1471 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 5 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 6 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 7 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1471 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1471 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1471 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 8 7881 Beachpoint Cir Bldg D Unit 9 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1472 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1472 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1345 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 10 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 11 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 12 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1481 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1482 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1482 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 14 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 15 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 16 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1482 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1482 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1467 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 17 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 18 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 19 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1467 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1467 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1467 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 90 1-0; /i lip Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery°5160/8160 0918/09 L90 Aaany oane olq!Iedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ}ewiol ap a;j9nb'T3 09 G8/09 LS®Aaany qj!m algljedwoo„g/g Z x„l ozis pgel 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 2 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 20 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 21 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1480 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1468 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1468 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 3 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 4 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 5 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1480 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1480 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1480 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 6 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 7 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 8 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1480 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1481 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1481 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7882 Beachpoint Cir Bldg B Unit 9 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 1 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 10 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1481 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1475 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1477 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 11 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 12 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 14 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1477 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1477 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1477 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 15 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 16 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 17 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1478 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1478 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1478 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 18 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 19 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1478 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1479 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1475 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 20 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 3 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1479 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1475 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1475 159-031-24 159-031-24 159-031-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 5 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 6 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 7 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1476 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1476 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1476 159-031-24 159-031-24 157-503-04 Occupant Occupant Mcallise J J &J L Family Trust/Occupant 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 8 7912 Beachpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 9 18717 Chapel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92648-1476 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1477 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1808 —00 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ���j� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0918/09190 Aaany oanu algqudwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z}uuaaoj ap 9jqanb113 " 0918/09 L90 Aaany q;!m 9lg1iudwoo<,9/5 Z x,,[azls laqul 157-503-05 157-503-06 157-503-07 Kanellis Janice Ziegler Barbara A Gesswein Eric 18731 Chapel Ln 18733 Chapel Ln 18735 Chapel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1808 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1808 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1808 157-503-08 157-503-09 157-503-10 Occupant Harake David F&Jill M Malsed Chris 18737 Chapel Ln 18739 Chapel Ln 18741 Chapel Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1808 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1808 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1808 157-331-12 157-331-11 157-331-13 Jarrett Jay H & Biere-jarrett Sandra Kay Ostergaard Ronald O & Maura A Cartwright Stephen,Allen 8251 Delfino Cir 8252 Delfino Cir 8261 Delfino Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1605 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1605 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1605 157-331-10 157-331-14 157-331-09 Occupant Occupant Schilke Sarah 8262 Delfino Cir 8271 Delfino Cir 8272 Delfino Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1605 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1605 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1605 157-331-15 157-502-03 157-502-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8281 Delfino Cir 18531 Demion Ln Unit A 18531 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-1605 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8824 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8824 157-502-03 157-502-03 157-501-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18531 Demion Ln Unit C 18531 Demion Ln Unit D 18532 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8824 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8824 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8822 157-501-07 157-501-07 157-502-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18532 Demion Ln Unit C 18532 Demion Ln Unit D 18541 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-8822 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8822 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8826 157-502-04 157-502-04 157-502-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18541 Demion Ln Unit B 18541 Demion Ln Unit C 18541 Demion Ln Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-8826 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8826 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8826 157-501-08 157-501-08 157-501-08 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18542 Demion Ln Unit A 18542 Demion Ln Unit B 18542 Demion Ln Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-8820 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8820 Huntington Beach CA 92646-9820 157-501-08 157-502-05 157-502-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18542 Demion Ln Unit D 18551 Demion Ln Unit A 18551 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8820 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8828 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8828 00 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 biouette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery°5160/8160 09 L2/09 L5o�J9AV oane alggedwoo ww Lq x ww SZ jewao}ap al4anbIT3 09 L2/09 L5o�J9AV qj!m alq udwoo„2/5 Z x«L azls lagel 157-502-05 157-502-05 157-501-09 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18551 Demion Ln Unit C 18551 Demion Ln Unit D 18552 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-8828 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8828 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8818 157-501-09 157-501-09 157-501-09 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18552 Demion Ln Unit B 18552 Demion Ln Unit C 18552 Demion Ln.Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-8818 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8818 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8818 157-502-06 157-502-06 157-502-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18571 Demion Ln Unit A 18571 Demion Ln Unit B 18571 Demion Ln Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-8830 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8830 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8830 157-502-06 157-501-10 157-501-10 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18571 Demion Ln Unit D 18572 Demion Ln Unit A 18572 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8830 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8816 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8816 157-501-10 157-501-10 157-502-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18572 Demion Ln Unit C 18572 Demion Ln Unit D 18581 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-8816 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8816 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8800 157-502-07 157-502-07 157-502-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18581 Demion Ln Unit B 18581 Demion Ln Unit C 18581 Demion Ln Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-8800 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8800 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8800 157-501-11 157-501-11 157-501-11 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Demion Ln Unit A 18582 Demion Ln Unit B 18582 Demion Ln Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-8814 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8814 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8814 157-501-11 157-502-08 157-502-08 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18582 Demion Ln Unit D 18601 Demion Ln Unit A 18601 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8814 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8802 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8802 157-502-08 157-502-08 157-501-12 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18601 Demion Ln Unit C 18601 Demion Ln Unit D 18602 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-8802 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8802 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8812 157-501-12 157-501-12 157-501-12 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18602 Demion Ln Unit B 18602 Demion Ln Unit C 18602 Demion Ln Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-8812 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8812 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8812 L//11� /D ---DD,�Z label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 / Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0918/09190�aany oaAe alggedwoo ww�q x ww 5Z teuwaoi ap allanbli3 0918/0919@ fuany yjim algitedwoo<<8/9 Z x,j azls lagel 157-502-09 157-502-09 157-502-09 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18611 Demion Ln Unit A 18611 Demion Ln Unit B 18611 Demion Ln Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-8804 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8804 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8804 157-502-09 157-501-13 157-501-13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18611 Demion Ln Unit D 18612 Demion Ln Unit A 18612 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8804 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8810 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8810 157-501-13 157-501-13 157-502-10 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18612 Demion Ln Unit C 18612 Demion Ln Unit D 18621 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-8810 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8810 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8806 157-502-10 157-502-10 157-502-10 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18621 Demion Ln Unit B 18621 Demion Ln Unit C 18621 Demion Ln Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-8806 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8806 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8806 157-501-14 157-501-14 157-501-14 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18622 Demion Ln Unit A 18622 Demion Ln Unit B 18622 Demion Ln Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-8808 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8808 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8808 157-501-14 157-502-11 157-502-11 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18622 Demion Ln Unit D 18631 Demion Ln Unit A 18631 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8808 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8842 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8842 157-502-11 157-502-11 157-501-15 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18631 Demion Ln Unit C 18631 Demion Ln Unit D 18632 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-8842 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8842 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8840 157-501-15 157-501-15 157-501-15 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18632 Demion Ln Unit B 18632 Demion Ln Unit C 18632 Demion Ln Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-8840 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8840 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8840 157-502-12 157-502-12 157-502-12 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18641 Demion Ln Unit A 18641 Demion Ln Unit B 18641 Demion Ln Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-8844 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8844 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8844 157-502-12 157-501-16 157-501-16 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18641 Demion Ln Unit D 18642 Demion Ln Unit A 18642 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8844 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8838 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8838 /D—�� label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 /l//-�— Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery 05160/8160 0918/09I-5o Many oaAe a{gl1edwoo into Lq x ww 5Z lewaoi op ogGnbii3 ° 0919/09L50 AJGAy qj;m 9lgljedwoo„2/9 Z x<<L azis l9gel 157-501-16 157-501-16 157-502-13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18642 Demion Ln Unit C 18642 Demion Ln Unit D 18651 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-8838 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8838 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8846 157-502-13 157-502-13 157-502-13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18651 Demion Ln Unit B 18651 Demion Ln Unit C 18651 Demion Ln Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-8846 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8846 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8846 157-501-17 157-501-17 157-501-17 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18652 Demion Ln Unit A 18652 Demion Ln Unit B 18652 Demion Ln Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-8836 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8836 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8836 157-501-17 157-502-14 157-502-14 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18652 Demion Ln Unit D 18671 Demion Ln Unit A 18671 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8836 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8848 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8848 157-502-14 157-502-14 157-501-18 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18671 Demion Ln Unit C 18671 Demion Ln Unit D 18672 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8848 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8848 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8834 157-501-18 157-501-18 157-502-15 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18672 Demion Ln Unit C 18672 Demion Ln Unit D 18691 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-8834 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8834 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8850 157-502-15 157-502-15 157-502-15 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18691 Demion Ln Unit B 18691 Demion Ln Unit C 18691 Demion Ln Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-8850 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8850 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8850 157-501-19 157-501-19 157-501-19 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18692 Demion Ln Unit A 18692 Demion Ln Unit B 18692 Demion Ln Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-8832 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8832 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8832 157-501-19 157-502-16 157-502-16 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18692 Demion Ln Unit D 18701 Demion Ln Unit A 18701 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8832 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1717 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1717 157-502-16 157-502-16 157-501-20 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18701 Demion Ln Unit C 18701 Demion Ln Unit D 18702 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-1717 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1717 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8866 &71�' /0 -100 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ° _ /. /. �+inniatto Aa fnrm�t 9F mm v F7 mm cmm�atihla avar.Avary®51 R(1/R16F1 0918/091go Aaany oaAo algl>edwoo ww Lq x ww 9Z jewaoi ap aj;anbi13 an 0918/09 G5o(aany qj!m algl}edwoo,,S/9 Z x j azls lagel 157-501-20 157-501-20 157-501-20 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18702 Demion Ln Unit B 18702 Demion Ln Unit C 18702 Demion Ln Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-8866 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8866 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8866 157-502-17 157-502-17 157-502-17 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18711 Demion Ln Unit A 18711 Demion Ln Unit B 18711 Demion Ln Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-8854 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8854 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8854 157-502-17 157-501-21 157-501-21 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18711 Demion Ln Unit D 18712 Demion Ln Unit A 18712 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-8854 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8864 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8864 157-501-21 157-501-21 157-502-18 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18712 Demion Ln Unit C 18712 Demion Ln Unit D 18721 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-8864 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8864 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8856 157-502-18 157-502-18 157-501-22 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18721 Demion Ln Unit C 18721 Demion Ln Unit D 18722 Demion Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-8856 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8856 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8862 157-501-22 157-501-22 157-501-22 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18722 Demion Ln Unit B 18722 Demion Ln Unit C 18722 Demion Ln Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-8862 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8862 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8862 157-502-19 157-502-19 157-502-19 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18741 Demion Ln Unit A 18741 Demion Ln Unit B 18741 Demion Ln Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-1717 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1717 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1717 157-502-19 157-501-23 157-501-23 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18741 Demion Ln Unit D 18742 Demion Ln Unit A 18742 Demion Ln Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-1717 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8859 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8859 157-501-23 157-501-23 159-042-15 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18742 Demion Ln Unit C 18742 Demion Ln Unit D 7811 Ellis Ave Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8859 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8859 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1658 159-042-15 159-042-15 159-042-15 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7811 Ellis Ave Unit 2 7811 Ellis Ave Unit 3 7811 Ellis Ave Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1658 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1658 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1658 �� /D -Do label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 `® _ ' /. /,, FtinnAttp rip fnrmat 95 mm x F7 mm nmmnatihla aver.Avery®5160/8160 0919/0915®Aa9ny oaAs algl1edwoo ww L9 x ww gZ jBwjo;ap 91janbq p 0918/091g®A]9AV ullM alq!12dwoo„g/g Z x,j azis pgsl 159-042-16 159-042-16 159-042-16 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7821 Ellis Ave Unit 1 7821 Ellis Ave Unit 2 7821 Ellis Ave Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1659 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1659 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1659 159-042-16 159-042-17 159-042-17 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7821 Ellis Ave Unit 4 7831 Ellis Ave Unit 1 7831 Ellis Ave Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1659 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1660 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1660 159-042-17 159-042-17 159-042-18 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7831 Ellis Ave Unit 3 7831 Ellis Ave Unit 4 7841 Ellis Ave Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1660 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1660 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1661 159-042-18 159-042-18 159-042-18 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7841 Ellis Ave Unit 2 7841 Ellis Ave Unit 3 7841 Ellis Ave Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1661 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1661 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1661 159-032-03 159-032-03 159-032-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7861 Ellis Ave Unit 1 7861 Ellis Ave Unit 2 7861 Ellis Ave Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1662 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1662 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1662 159-032-03 159-032-02 159-032-02 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7861 Ellis Ave Unit 4 7871 Ellis Ave Unit 1 7871 Ellis Ave Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1662 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1663 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1663 159-032-02 159-032-02 159-031-13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7871 Ellis Ave Unit 3 7871 Ellis Ave Unit 4 7891 Ellis Ave Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1663 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1663 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1664 159-031-13 159-031-13 159-031-13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7891 Ellis Ave Unit 2 7891 Ellis Ave Unit 3 7891 Ellis Ave Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1664 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1664 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1664 159-031-12 159-031-12 159-031-12 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7901 Ellis Ave Unit 1 7901 Ellis Ave Unit 2 7901 Ellis Ave Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1665 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1665 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1665 157-341-07 157-341-08 157-343-20 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8031 Ellis Ave 8041 Ellis Ave 8071 Ellis Ave Huntington Beach CA 92646-1719 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1719 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1767 &-7,ol� j0 --C—X)�Z label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ~ -j/4�i� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09 L8/09 LS®faany oane algl;.edwoo ww L9 x ww gZ iewiol ap 9jg9nbl13 Ogle/0919®faany ql!m algl}edwoo,,9/9 Z x,j azls lapel 157-343-20 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8071 Ellis Ave Unit 1/2 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 101 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 102 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1767 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8869 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8869 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 103 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 104 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 105 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8869 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8869 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8869 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 106 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 107 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 108 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8869 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8869 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8869 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 109 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 110 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 111 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8869 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8883 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8883 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 112 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 113 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 114 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8883 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8883 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8883 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 115 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 116 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 117 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8867 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8870 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8871 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 118 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 119 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 120 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8871 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8871 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8871 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 121 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 122 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 128 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8871 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8871 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8871 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 129 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 130 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 131 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8871 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8872 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8872 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 132 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 133 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 134 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8872 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8872 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8872 j� /0 —CMG�Z label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 • _ /��,� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery 05160/8160 09L8/09 Lgo Aaany 09AL algq dwoo ww 1g x ww gZ jzwaoi ap alIanbli3 09 L8/09 Lg®AaaAV qj!m algljedwoo„8/g Z x,,L azls lagel ' 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 135 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 136 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 137 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8872 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8872 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8872 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 138 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 201 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 202 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8873 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8873 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8873 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 203 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 204 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 205 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8873 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8873 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8873 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 206 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 207 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 208 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8873 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8873 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8874 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 209 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 210 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 211 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8874 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8874 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8884 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 212 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 213 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 214 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8884 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8884 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8884 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 215 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 216 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 217 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8884 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8875 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8875 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 218 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 219 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 220 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8875 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8875 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8875 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 221 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 222 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 223 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8875 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8875 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8875 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 224 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 225 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 226 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8876 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8876 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8885 gum label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 - / Ftinnatte HP fnrmat 9,mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery 05160/8160 0918/09190 faany oaAe alglIedwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z Iewaoj ap ajjanbl33 0910/091-9®faany qm algljedwoo„g/9 Z x<<l ezls laqui 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 227 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 228 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 229 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8885 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8885 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8885 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 236 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 237 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 238 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8885 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8885 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8877 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit.239 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 240 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 241 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8877 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8877 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8877 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 242 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 243 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 301 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8877 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8877 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8877 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 302 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 303 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 304 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8877 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8878 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8878 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 305 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 306 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 307 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8878 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8878 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8878 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 308 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 309 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 310 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8878 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8878 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8878 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 311 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 312 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 313 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8879 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8879 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8879 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 314 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 315 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 316 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8879 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8879 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8879 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 317 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 318 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 319 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8879 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8879 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8880 /6 —daY—, label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ���� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0918/09150 Aaany oane algltctlwoo ww L9 x ww gZ}ewaof op aItanbl13 0918/09190 AAAV gtlnn aigljedwoo„2/9 Z x„G ezls lagel 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 320 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 321 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 322 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8880 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8880 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8880 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 323 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 324 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 325 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8880 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8880 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8890 157-471-32 157-471-32 157 471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 326 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 327 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 328 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8886 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8881 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8881 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 329 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 336 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 337 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8881 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8881 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8881 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 338 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 339 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 340 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8881 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8882 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8882 157-471-32 157-471-32 157-471-32 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 341 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 342 8102 Ellis Ave Unit 343 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8882 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8882 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8882 157-502-02 157-502-02 157-502-02 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8132 Ellis Ave Unit A 8132 Ellis Ave Unit B 8132 Ellis Ave Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-1710 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1710 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1710 157-502-02 157-502-01 157-502-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8132 Ellis Ave Unit D 8142 Ellis Ave Unit A 8142 Ellis Ave Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-1710 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1711 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1711 157-502-01 157-502-01 157-343-16 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8142 Ellis Ave Unit C 8142 Ellis Ave Unit D 8161 Ellis Ave Huntington Beach CA 92646-1711 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1711 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1721 157-501-06 157-501-06 157-501-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8172 Ellis Ave Unit A 8172 Ellis Ave Unit B 8172 Ellis Ave Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-1750 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1750 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1750 label size 1"x 2 5/8' compatible with Avery 12)5160/8160 Frimintte de format 25 mm x 67 mm comoatible avec Avery 05160/8160 091-8/0q l.q@�aany oaAa elggedwoo ww 19 x ww gZ}ewaoi ap a149nbilg 091-8/091-g®[uaAV qj!m algliadwoo„g/g Z x j ezls lagel 157-501-06 157-501-05 157-501-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8172 Ellis Ave Unit D 8182 Ellis Ave Unit A 8182 Ellis Ave Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-1750 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1766 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1766 157-501-05 157-501-05 157-501-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8182 Ellis Ave Unit C 8182 Ellis Ave Unit D 8200 Ellis Ave Unit 70 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1766 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1766 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1839 157-501-01 157-501-01 157-501-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8200 Ellis Ave Unit 71 8200 Ellis Ave Unit 72 8200 Ellis Ave Unit 73 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1839 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1839 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1839 157-501-01 159-441-06 159-441-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8200 Ellis Ave Unit 74 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 1 Unit A 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 1 Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-1839 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1806 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1806 159-441-06 159-441-06 159-441-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 1 Unit C 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 1 Unit D 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 2 Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-1806 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1806 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1805 159-441-06 159-441-06 159-441-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 2 Unit B 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 2 Unit C 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 2 Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-1805 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1805 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1805 159-441-06 159-441-06 159-441-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 3 Unit A 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 3 Unit B 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 3 Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-1804 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1804 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1804 159-441-06 159-441-06 159-441-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 3 Unit D 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 4 Unit A 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 4 Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-1804 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1803 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1803 159-441-06 159-441-06 159-441-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 4 Unit C 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 4 Unit D 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 5 Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-1803 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1803 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1802 159-441-06 159-441-06 159-441-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 5 Unit B 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 5 Unit C 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 5 Unit D Huntington Beach CA 92646-1802 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1802 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1802 L-7,q —00 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ��, /� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09 12/09 1 50 Aaany oaAe olgIIedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ Iewaoi ap 91janbq 09t8/09190 Aaany UIIM algl}edwoo„g/g Z x„L ozls lagel ° 159-441-06 159-441-06 159-441-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 6 Unit A 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 6 Unit B 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 6 Unit C Huntington Beach CA 92646-1801 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1801 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1801 159-441-06 159-441-06 159-441-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 6 Unit D 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 7 Unit A 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 7 Unit B Huntington Beach CA 92646-1801 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1877 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1877 159-441-06 159-441-06 932-980-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 7 Unit C 8231 Ellis Ave Bldg 7 Unit D 18731 Elmwood Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1877 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1877 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1811 932-880-62 932-880-02 932-880-61 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18732 Elmwood Ln 18733 Elmwood Ln 18734 Elmwood Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1812 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1811 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1812 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 1001 18561 Florida St Unit 1002 18561 Florida St Unit 1003 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6037 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6037 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6037 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 1004 18561 Florida St Unit 1005 18561 Florida St Unit 1006 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6037 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6037 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6037 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 1007 18561 Florida St Unit 1008 18561 Florida St Unit 1009 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6037 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6038 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6038 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 1010 18561 Florida St Unit 1011 18561 Florida St Unit 1012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6038 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6038 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6038 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 1013 18561 Florida St Unit 1014 18561 Florida St Unit 1015 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6038 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6038 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6039 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 1016 18561 Florida St Unit 1017 18561 Florida St Unit 1018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6039 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6039 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6039 /0 —00�z label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 /i /� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0q l8/0q l50 Aaany oaA,e algqudwoo ww lg x ww 53}cwao�op 9;lanbi13 0q l8%Og l5®/dany yjlM algl}edwoo,,g/5 3 x,:t azis lagel 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2001 18561 Florida St Unit 2002 18561 Florida St Unit 2003 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6039 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6039 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6039 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2004 18561 Florida St Unit 2005 18561 Florida St Unit 2006 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6040 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6040 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6040 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2007 18561 Florida St Unit 2008 18561 Florida St Unit 2009 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6040 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6040 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6040 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2010 18561 Florida St Unit 2011 18561 Florida St Unit 2012 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6040 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6041 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6041 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2013 18561 Florida St Unit 2014 18561 Florida St Unit 2015 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6041 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6041 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6041 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2016 18561 Florida St Unit 2017 18561 Florida St Unit 2018 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6041 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6041 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6042 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2019 18561 Florida St Unit 2020 18561 Florida St Unit 2021 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6042 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6042 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6042 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2022 18561 Florida St Unit 2023 18561 Florida St Unit 2024 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6042 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6042 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6042 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2025 18561 Florida St Unit 2026 18561 Florida St Unit 2027 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6043 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6043 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6043 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2028 18561 Florida St Unit 2029 18561 Florida St Unit 2030 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6043 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6043 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6043 ��6� /d — � label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery @5160/8160 0918/0915®Aaany oane alggedwoo ww Lg x ww 53 jewioi op allanbl13 0918/0915©Aa9AV qj!m algi}edwoo„8/5 3 x,,[azls lagel . M 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2031 18561 Florida St Unit 2032 18561 Florida St Unit 2033 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6043 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6044 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6044 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2034 18561 Florida St Unit 2035 18561 Florida St Unit 2036 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6044 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6044 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6044 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2037 18561 Florida St Unit 2038 18561 Florida St Unit 2039 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6044 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6044 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6045 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant " Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2040 18561 Florida St Unit 2041 18561 Florida St Unit 2042 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6045 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6045 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6045 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2043 18561 Florida St Unit 2044 18561 Florida St Unit 2045 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6045 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6045 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6045 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2046 18561 Florida St Unit 2047 18561 Florida St Unit 2048 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6046 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6046 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6046 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 2049 18561 Florida St Unit 2050 18561 Florida St Unit 3001 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6046 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6046 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6046 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3002 18561 Florida St Unit 3003 18561 Florida St Unit 3004 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6046 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6047 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6047 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3005 18561 Florida St Unit 3006 18561 Florida St Unit 3007 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6047 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6047 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6047 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3008 18561 Florida St Unit 3009 18561 Florida St Unit 3010 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6047 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6047 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6048 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery°5160/8160 09 G8/091g®Aaany Dane alggedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ Iewaof ap aj;anblj3 09 G9/09 Lg®Aaany qj!M algijedwoo<<8/g Z x,j azls lagel so 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3011 18561 Florida St Unit 3012 18561 Florida St Unit 3013 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6048 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6048 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6048 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3014 18561 Florida St Unit 3015 18561 Florida St Unit 3016 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6048 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6048 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6048 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3017 18561 Florida St Unit 3018 18561 Florida St Unit 3019 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6049 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6049 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6049 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3020 18561 Florida St Unit 3021 18561 Florida St Unit 3022 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6049 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6049 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6049 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3023 18561 Florida St Unit 3024 18561 Florida St Unit 3025 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6049 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6050 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6050 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3026 18561 Florida St Unit 3027 18561 Florida St Unit 3028 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6050 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6050 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6050 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3029 18561 Florida St Unit 3030 18561 Florida St Unit 3031 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6050 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6050 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6051 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3032 18561 Florida St Unit 3033 18561 Florida St Unit 3034 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6051 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6051 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6051 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3035 18561 Florida St Unit 3036 18561 Florida St Unit 3037 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6051 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6051 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6051 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3038 18561 Florida St Unit 3039 18561 Florida St Unit 3040 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6052 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6052 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6052 j!!M ��� /O —Gb� label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 `$ binuette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0918/09 G5®zany oaAe algljedwoo aqua L9 x aqua 5Z Ieuaaoj 9p a;janbu3 0 9 1-8/0 9 1 50 zany q;!m alggedwoo„2/5 Z x,j ozls lagel am 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3041 18561 Florida St Unit 3042 18561 Florida St Unit 3043 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6052 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6052 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6052 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3044 18561 Florida St Unit 3045 18561 Florida St Unit 3046 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6052 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6053 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6053 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3047 18561 Florida St Unit 3048 18561 Florida St Unit 3049 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6053 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6053 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6053 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 3050 18561 Florida St Unit 4001 18561 Florida St Unit 4002 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6053 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6053 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6054 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4003 18561 Florida St Unit 4004 18561 Florida St Unit 4005 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6054 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4006 18561 Florida St Unit 4007 18561 Florida St Unit 4008 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6054 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6054 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4009 18561 Florida St Unit 4010 18561 Florida St Unit 4011 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6055 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6055 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6055 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4012 18561 Florida St Unit 4013 18561 Florida St Unit 4014 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6055 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6055 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6055 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4015 18561 Florida St Unit 4016 185614--lorida St Unit 4017 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6055 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6056 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6056 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4018 18561 Florida St Unit 4019 18561 Florida St Unit 4020 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6056 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6056 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6056 REMEJ� /d —LYs label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 /I- /.I Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible aver Avery 05160/8160 09 GS/09 G5o Aaany caA'e algpedwoo ww Lq x ww gZ jewaoi ep allanbl13 09 L2/09 L5c Aaany qj!m algIjedwoo„9/9 Z x«L azls lagel 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4021 18561 Florida St Unit 4022 18561 Florida St Unit 4023 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6056 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6056 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6057 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4024 18561 Florida St Unit 4025 18561 Florida St Unit 4026 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6057 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6057 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6057 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4027 18561 Florida St Unit 4028 18561 Florida St Unit 4029 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6057 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6057 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6057 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4030 18561 Florida St Unit 4031 18561 Florida St Unit 4032 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6058 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6058 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6058 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4033 18561 Florida St Unit 4034 18561 Florida St Unit 4035 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6058 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6058 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6058 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4036 18561 Florida St Unit 4037 18561 Florida St Unit 4038 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6058 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6059 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6059 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4039 18561 Florida St Unit 4040 18561 Florida St Unit 4041 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6059 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6059 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6059 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4042 18561 Florida St Unit 4043 18561 Florida St Unit 4044 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6059 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6059 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6060 159-092-07 159-092-07 159-092-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4045 18561 Florida St Unit 4046 18561 Florida St Unit 4047 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6060 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6060 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6060 159-092-07 159-102-36 159-102-36 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18561 Florida St Unit 4048 18652 Florida St Unit 105 18652 Florida St Unit 150 Huntington Beach CA 92648-606,0/ Huntington Beach CA 92648-6005 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6089 E//� �L� ��T label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 �� /„ kirniette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0918/09L5®faany oane algliedwoo ww�q x ww 5Z jBwjo}ap al4anbij3 0918/0915®faany qj!m algljedwoo„g/5 Z x«L azls lagel so 159-102-36 159-102-36 159-102-36 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18652 Florida St Unit 200 18652 Florida St Unit 222 18652 Florida St Unit 225 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6000 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6006 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6007 159-102-36 159-102-36 159-102-36 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18652 Florida St Unit 226 18652 Florida St Unit 245 18652 Florida St Unit 300 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6007 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6006 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6069 159-102-36 159-102-36 159-102-36 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18652 Florida St Unit 330 18652 Florida St Unit 335 18652 Florida St Unit 345 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6075 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6095 Huntington Beach CA 92648-7900 159-102-36 159-102-36 159-102-14 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18652 Florida St Unit 355 18652 Florida St Unit 360 18662 Florida St Huntington Beach CA 92648-7901 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6096 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1917 159-102-46 159-102-46 159-102-46 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18672 Florida St Unit 100 18672 Florida St Unit 101A 18672 Florida St Unit 101B Huntington Beach CA 92648-1925 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1925 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1925 159-102-46 159-102-46 159-102-46 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18672 Florida St Unit 102A 18672 Florida St Unit 201 18672 Florida St Unit 201A Huntington Beach CA 92648-1925 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1925 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6088 159-102-46 159-102-46 159-102-46 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18672 Florida St Unit 201B 18672 Florida St Unit 202A 18672 Florida St Unit 202E Huntington Beach CA 92648-6088 Huntington Beach CA 92648-7601 Huntington Beach CA 92648-6088 159-102-46 159-102-46 159-102-46 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18672 Florida St Unit 301 18672 Florida St Unit 302A 18672 Florida St Unit 302B Huntington Beach CA 92648-1925 Huntington Beach CA 92648-7602 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1992 159-102-46 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18672 Florida St Unit 302D 18700 Florida St Unit 100 18700 Florida St Unit 101 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1925 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 102 18700 Florida St Unit 103 18700 Florida St Unit 104 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 �, Ftimiatta dp.fnrmat 95 mm x 67 mm rmmnatihle aver.Avery 05160/8160 0918/0915©Aaany oaAe algliedwoo ww Lg x ww 5Z jewaoi a ailanblj3 0918/09150 Aaany qm algi}edwoo ,2/9 Z x„i azls lapel so 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 105 18700 Florida St Unit 106 18700 Florida St Unit 107 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 108 18700 Florida St Unit 109 18700 Florida St Unit 110 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 111 18700 Florida St Unit 112 18700 Florida St Unit 113 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 115 18700 Florida St Unit 200 18700 Florida St Unit 201 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1961 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 202 18700 Florida St Unit 203 18700 Florida St Unit 204 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 205 18700 Florida St Unit 206 18700 Florida St Unit 207 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 208 18700 Florida St Unit 209 18700 Florida St Unit 210 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 211 18700 Florida St Unit 212 18700 Florida St Unit 213 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 214 18700 Florida St Unit 215 18700 Florida St Unit 217 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 219 18700 Florida St Unit 221 18700 Florida St Unit 223 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1962 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Won .: _�o� label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery85160/8160 /i_ /IJ _ Ftimmtte HP.fnrmat 7..,mm x R7 mm nmmnatihle aver,Avery©5160/8160 09L8/0915®Aaany Dane algljeduwoo uuuu L9 x uuuu 5Z jeuwaoj ap a;.anbr3 0918/0915®AaaAV ujlM algljetluwoo„g/5 Z x«L ozls lagel 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 225 18700 Florida St Unit 227 18700 Florida St Unit 229 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 231 18700 Florida St Unit 300 18700 Florida St Unit 301 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 302 18700 Florida St Unit 303 18700 Florida St Unit 304 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 305 18700 Florida St Unit 306 18700 Florida St Unit 307 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 308 18700 Florida St Unit 309 18700 Florida St Unit 310 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 311 18700 Florida St Unit 312 18700 Florida St Unit 313 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1963 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 314 18700 Florida St Unit 315 18700 Florida St Unit 317 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 319 18700 Florida St Unit 321 18700 Florida St Unit 323 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 159-102-45 . 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 325 18700 Florida St Unit 400 18700 Florida St Unit 401 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 402 18700 Florida St Unit 403 18700 Florida St Unit 404 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 00 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160i8160 �� �� Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery°5160/8160 0919/0915®Aaany pane algijedwoo ww jq x ww 5Z jewjoi ap allanbi13 No 0919/0915®AaaAV U1inn alq!jedwoo,,9/5 Z x<<1 azis lagel 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 405 . 18700 Florida St Unit 406 18700 Florida St Unit 407 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1964 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 408 18700 Florida St Unit 409 18700 Florida St Unit 410 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 411 18700 Florida St Unit 412 18700 Florida St Unit 413 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102 45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 414 18700 Florida St Unit 415 18700 Florida St Unit 417 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 159-102-45 159-102-45 159-102-45 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 419 18700 Florida St Unit 421 18700 Florida St Unit 423 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 159-102-45 157-342-03 157-342-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18700 Florida St Unit 425 8091 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8091 Forelle Dr Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1965 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7714 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7714 157-342-03 157-343-03 157-343-03 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8091 Forelle Dr Unit 4 8092 Forelle Dr Unit 1 8092 Forelle Dr Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7714 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7715 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7715 157-343-03 157-343-03 157-342-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8092 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8092 Forelle Dr Unit 4 8101 Forelle Dr Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7715 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7715 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7712 157-342-04 157-342-04 157-342-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8101 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8101 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8101 Forelle Dr Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7712 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7712 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7712: 157-343-04 157-343-04 157-343-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Forelle Dr Unit 1 8102 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8102 Forelle Dr Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7717 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7717 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7717 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 09 G9109190(aany oane aIgliedwoo ww 19 x ww 9Z Iewaoj a 949nbii3 Lu 0918/09 L9�wand U�inn algiietlwoo„8/9 Z x,:l azis lagei so 157-343-04 157-342-05 157-342-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8102 Forelle Dr Unit 4 8111 Forelle Dr Unit 1 8111 Forelle Dr Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7717 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7710 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7710 157-342-05 157-342-05 157-343-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8111 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8111 Forelle Dr Unit 4 8112 Forelle Dr Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7710 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7710 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7719 157-343-05 157-343-05 157-343-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8112 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8112 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8112 Forelle Dr Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7719 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7719 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7719 157-342-06 157-342-06 157-342-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8131 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8131 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8131 Forelle Dr Unit 1 ngton Beach CA 92646-7708 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7708 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7708 Hunti 157-342-06 157-343-06 157-343-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8132 Forelle Dr Unit 1 8132 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8131 Forelle Dr Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1698 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7708 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1698 g 157-343-06 157-342-07 157-343-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8132 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8132 Forelle Dr Unit 4 8141 Forelle Dr Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1698 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1698 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7706 157-342-07 157-342-07 157-342-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8141 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8141 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8141 Forelle Dr Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7706 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7706 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7706 157-343-07 157-343-07 157-343-07 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8142 Forelle Dr Unit 2 8142 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8142 Forelle Dr Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7700 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7700 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7700 ! 157-343-07 157-342-08 157-342-08 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8142 Forelle Dr Unit 4 8151 Forelle Dr Unit 1 8151 Forelle Dr Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7700 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7704 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7704 157-342-08 932-880-96 157-342-08 Rosenblum Jesse H Occupant Occupant 8151 Forelle Dr Unit 3 8151 Forelle Dr Unit 4 8161 Forelle Dr Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-7704 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7704 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7702 /0 — label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 _....(a)ci cnioi cn 09 2/091go/aany pane aiggedwoo ww Lq x ww 5Z jewaoi ap aTjanb'T3 09 2/091go/aany ujim alq.ijedwoo„9/5 Z x,j azls lagel so 932-880-97 932-880-98 932-880-99 Occupant Occupant Occupant Occu Occu Forelle Dr Unit B 8161 Forelle Dr Unit C 8161 Forelle Dr Unit D 8161 gton Beach CA 92646-7702 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7702 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7702 Huntin 157-345-15 159-032-04 157-345-02 Occupant Merrick Elizabeth J Trust Olson Judy A p Olson Forelle Dr 8212 Forelle Dr 7862 Fox Cir Unit 1 8202 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1649 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1649 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1457 159-032-04 159-032-04 159-032-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7862 Fox Cir Unit 2 7862 Fox Cir Unit 3 7862 Fox Cir Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1457 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1457 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1457 159-032-01 159-032-01 159-032-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7872 Fox Cir Unit 2 7872 Fox Cir Unit 3 7872 Fox Cir Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1456 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1456 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1456 g 159-042-04 159-042-02 159-032-01 Summers Family Trust Occupant Occupant 7872 Fox Cir Unit 4 7812 Franklin Dr 7832 Franklin Dr Huntington Beach CA 92648-1420 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1420 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1456 157-343-09 157-345-04 159-042-01 Garcia Johnnie Occupant Occupant Occupant Franklin Dr 18381 Goodwin Ln 18382 Goodwin Ln 7842 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1650 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1651 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1420 157-345-05 157-343-11 157-343-10 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18391 Goodwin Ln 18392 Goodwin Ln 18401 Goodwin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1650 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1651 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1652 157-343-12 157-345-07 157-345-06 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18402 Goodwin Ln 18421 Goodwin Ln 18422 Goodwin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1653 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1652 Huntington Beach CA 92646-165 157-345-08 157-343-14 157-343-13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18432 Goodwin Ln 18441 Goodwin Ln 18431 Goodwin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1652 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1652 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1653 g 157-345-10 157-343-15 157-345-09 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18452 Goodwin Ln 18461 Goodwin Ln 18442 Goodwin Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1653 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1653 Huntington Beach CA 92646-165 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery05160/8160 09�2/09G90 Aaany Dane alglietlwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z wwaoi ap alanbiI3 0918/09190 AaaAV qm algl>etlwoo,,8/9 i x„L ozls lagel " 157-345-13 157-345-14 157-471-10 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18482 Goodwin Ln 19492 Goodwin Ln 8071 Graziadio Dr Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1653 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1653 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1749 157-471-10 157-471-10 157-471-10 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8071 Graziadio Dr Unit 2 8071 Graziadio Dr Unit 3 8071 Graziadio Dr Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1749 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1749 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1749 157-47 1-29 157-47 1-29 157-47 1-29 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8072 Graziadio Dr Unit 1 8072 Graziadio Dr Unit 2 8072 Graziadio Dr Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1729 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1729 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1729 157-471-29 157-471-09 157-471-09 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8072 Graziadio Dr Unit 4 8091 Graziadio Dr Unit 1 8091 Graziadio Dr Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1729 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1748 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1748 157-471-09 157-471-09 157-471-28 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8091 Graziadio Dr Unit 3 8091 Graziadio Dr Unit 4 8092 Graziadio Dr Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1748 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1748 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1730 157-471-28 157-471-28 157-471-28 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8092 Graziadio Dr Unit 2 8092 Graziadio Dr Unit 3 8092 Graziadio Dr Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1730 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1730 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1730 157-343-21 157-343-27 157-343-22 Occupant Andrada Stephen Gallardo Gustavo & Blanca 8072 La Palma Dr 8081 La Palma Dr 8092 La Palma Dr Huntington Beach CA 92646-1664 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1655 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1655 157-343-26 157-343-23 157-343-25 Schroeder Walter D Perez Celestino &Patricia Occupant 8101 La Palma Dr 8102 La Palma Dr 8121 La Palma Dr Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-1655 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1655 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1632 157-343-25 157-343-25 157-343-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8121 La Palma Dr Unit B 8121 La Palma Dr Unit C 8131 La Palma Dr Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-1632 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1632 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1630 157-343-24 157-343-24 157-471-14 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8131 La Palma Dr Unit B 8131 La Palma Dr Unit C 18641 Libra Cir Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1630 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1630 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1744 _ U label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 09 G9/09 G90 Aa9Ay Dane 9lggedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z}ewioi 9p 9:49nbi13 0918/0919®Aa9Ay ql!m 9lgijedwoo„g/g Z x„�9zls loges so 157-471-14 157-471-14 157-471-14 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18641 Libra Cir Unit 2 18641 Libra Cir Unit 3 18641 Libra Cir Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1744 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1744 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1744 157-471-15 157-471-15 157-471-15 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18642 Libra Cir Unit 1 18642 Libra Cir Unit 2 18642 Libra Cir Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1743 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1743 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1743 157-471-15 157-471-13 157-471-13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18651 Libra Cir Unit 2 18642 Libra Cir Unit 4 18651 Libra Cir Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1743 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1745 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1745 157-471-13 157-471-17 157-471-13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18651 Libra Cir Unit 4 18662 Libra Cir Unit 1 18651 Libra Cir Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1741 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1745 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1745 157-471-17 157-471-17 157-471-17 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18662 Libra Cir Unit 2 18662 Libra Cir Unit 3 18662 Libra Cir Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1741 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1741 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1741 157-471-11 157-471-11 157-471-11 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18671 Libra Cir Unit 1 18671 Libra Cir Unit 2 18671 Libra Cir Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1747 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1747 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1747 157-471-18 157-471-18 157-471-11 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18672 Libra Cir Unit 1 18672 Libra Cir Unit 2 18671 Libra Cir Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1740 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1747 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1740 157-471-18 157-471-19 157-471-18 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18672 Libra Cir Unit 3 18672 Libra Cir Unit 4 18682 Libra Cir Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1740 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1740 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1739 157-471-19 157-471-19 157-471-19 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18682 Libra Cir Unit 3 18682 Libra Cir Unit 4 18682 Libra Cir Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1739 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1739 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1739 b't 157-471-20 157-471-20 157-471-20 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18702 Libra Cir Unit 2 18702 Libra Cir Unit 3 18702 Libra Cir Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1738 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1738 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1738 label size 1°x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 09 G2/09 G5®AaaAV oaAe alggedwoo ww Lg x ww 53 juwjo�op allanbl13 09)_8/09 G9@ AaaAV qj!m algljedwoo„2/9 3 x«G ozls lagei 157-471-20 157-471-21 157-471-21 Occupant' Occupant Occupant 18702 Libra Cir Unit 4 18712 Libra Cir Unit 1 18712 Libra Cir Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1738 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1737 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1737 157-471-21 157-471-21 157-471-22 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18712 Libra Cir Unit 3 18712 Libra Cir Unit 4 18722 Libra Cir Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1737 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1737 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1736 157-471-22 157-471-22 157-471-22 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18722 Libra Cir Unit 2 18722 Libra Cir Unit 3 18722 Libra Cir Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1736 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1736 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1736 157-471-27 157-471-27 157-471-27 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18741 Libra Cir Unit 1 18741 Libra Cir Unit 2 18741 Libra Cir Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1731 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1731 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1731 157-471-27 157-471-24 157-471-24 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18741 Libra Cir Unit 4 18742 Libra Cir Unit 1 18742 Libra Cir Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1731 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1734 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1734 157-471-24 157-471-24 157-471-26 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18742 Libra Cir Unit 3 18742 Libra Cir Unit 4 18751 Libra Cir Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1734 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1734 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1732 157-471-26 157-471-26 157-471-26 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18751 Libra Cir Unit 2 18751 Libra Cir Unit 3 18751 Libra Cir Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1732 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1732 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1732 157-471-25 157-471-25 157-471-25 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18752 Libra Cir Unit 1 18752 Libra Cir Unit 2 18752 Libra Cir Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1733 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1733 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1733 157-471-25 157-342-10 157-342-11 Occupant Koldus Cary Vicari Family Trust/Occupant 18752 Libra Cir Unit 4 18331 Lisa Ln 18351 Lisa Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1733 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1566 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1566 159-101-03 159-091-04 159-091-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18501 Main St 18543 Main St 18545 Main St Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 0918/0g l-50 kGAV cane algltedwoo ww Lg x ww gZ jewio;ap aRanbgj so 09 G8/0g&�aaAV qj!m algijedwoo«8/5 Z x j azls lapel 159-091-04 159-091-04 159-091-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18551 Main St 18557 Main St 18563 Main St Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 159-091-04 159-091-04 159-091-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18567 Main St 18569 Main St 18573 Main St Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 159-091-04 159-091-04 159-091-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18575 Main St 18577 Main St 18579 Main St Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 159-091-04 159-102-44 159-091-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18581 Main St 18582 Main St 18583 Main St gton Beach CA 92648-1701 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntin 159-102-44 159-091-04 159-102-30 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18584 Main St 18585 Main St 18586 Main St Huntington Beach CA 92648-1701 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1701 159-091-04 159-091-04 159-091-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18587 Main St 18589 Main St 18591 Main St Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 159-102-29 159-091-04 159-102-35 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18592 Main St 18595 Main St 18600 Main St Unit 100 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1701 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1709 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1729 159-102-35 159-102-35 159-102-35 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18600 Main St Unit 110 18600 Main St Unit 120 18600 Main St Unit 140 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1715 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1715 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1715 159-102-35 159-102-35 159-102-35 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18600 Main St Unit 150 18600 Main St Unit 160 18600 Main St Unit 180 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1730 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1716 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1716 159-102-35 159-102-35 159-102-35 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18600 Main St Unit 200 18600 Main St Unit 210 18600 Main St Unit 215 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1716 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1716 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1716 ,=7A /Zj --COX label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 12,5160/8160 09 t8/09[So Aaany NAB alq!j�dwoo ww Zq x ww 5Z 1ewaoi ap a11anbii3 09 G8/09[So Aaany q}Inn algljetlwoo„2/5 Z x ,G azis lagel 159-102-35 159-102-35 159-102-35 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18600 Main St Unit 220 18600 Main St Unit 230 18600 Main St Unit 250 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1716 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1726 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1724 159-102-35 159-102-35 159-102-35 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18600 Main St Unit 260 18600 Main St Unit 270 18600 Main St Unit 275 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1731 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1724 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1711 159-102-35 159-102-35 159-102-35 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18600 Main St Unit 280 18600 Main St Unit 285 18600 Main St Unit 290 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1724 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1732 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1716 159-102-35 159-091-04 159-091-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18600 Main St Unit 295 18603 Main St 18641 Main St Huntington Beach CA 92648-1728 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1710 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1710 159-091-05 159-091-05 159-091-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18661 Main St 18681 Main St Unit 101 18681 Main St Unit 102 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1710 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1722 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1722 159-091-05 159-091-05 159-091-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18681 Main St Unit 103 18685 Main St Unit 101 18685 Main St Unit 102 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1722 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1719 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1721 159-091-05 159-091-05 159-091-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18685 Main St Unit 103 18685 Main St Unit 104 18685 Main St Unit 105 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1721 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1721 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1721 159-091-05 159-091-05 159-091-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18685 Main St Unit 106 18685 Main St Unit 107 18685 Main St Unit 108 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1721 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1721 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1733 159-091-05 159-091-05 159-091-05 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18687 Main St Unit 101 18687 Main St Unit 102 18687 Main St Unit Huntington Beach CA 92648-1727 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1727 Huntington Beach CAA 92648-1727 159-091-05 157-331-24 157-331-23 Occupant Occupant Josephson Marvin J & Deborah Wood 18691 Main St 8252 Manifesto Cir 8262 Manifesto Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648-1710 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1619 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1619 -cad 5 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160^ ^^ 09 G9/09 L9®AaaAV oarte alq!lBdwoo ww Lq x ww 9Z IewaoI ap ajanblj3 09 L8/09 L9@ AjaAV ql!m alggedwoo ,9/9 Z x«L azls lagel so 157-331-22 932-880-36 932-880-37 Hansen Scot&Sandra Budwig Bonnie Jean Comagon Josephine 8272 Manifesto Cir 18631 Maplewood Cir 18632 Maplewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1820 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1819 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1619 932-880-35 932-880-38 932-880-34 Malody Michelle Occupant Mc Ginnis Shon C 18634 Maplewood Cir 18641 Maplewood Cir 18633 Maplewood Cir p Huntington Beach CA 92646-1820 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1819 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1820 932-880-39 932-880-33 932-880-40 Vander Molen Milton J Eldridge Richard J &Jan H Occupant 18642 Maplewood Cir 18643 Maplewood Cir 18644 Maplewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1819 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1820 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1819 932-880-32 932-880-78 932-880-44 Owens Carol Anne Pocheptsov Leonid P & Kanevsky Raisa Vannoy Linda K 18661 Maplewood Cir 18662 Maplewood Cir 18647 Maplewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1818 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1820 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1815 ! 932-880-79 932-880-43 932-880-80 Hisa Alexandre&Linda Schmid Danielle B Occupant 18664 Maplewood Cir 18671 Maplewood Cir 18663 Maplewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1815 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1818 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1815 932-880-42 932-880-81 932-880-41 Occupant Emerson Alan Perez Andrew D 18673 Maplewood Cir 18674 Maplewood Cir 18672 Maplewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1818 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1818 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1815 g 932-880-83 932-880-45 932-880-92 Missouri Linda A Yoshida Elvin S Meconis Kevin 18681 Maplewood Cir 18682 Maplewood Cir 18675 Maplewood Cir Huntin on Beach CA 92646-1817 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1815 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1816 ! 932-880-46 932-880-85 932-880-84 Swierszczek Jerzy Carroll Lorraine A Ranieri Sharon A 18684 Maplewood Cir 18691 Maplewood Cir 18683 Maplewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1816 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1816 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1817 ! 932-880-47 932-880-86 932-880-48 Trujillo Charles Peterson Patricia Joan Godel Erick 18693 Maplewood Cir 18694 Maplewood Cir 18692 Maplewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1817 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1816 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1817 932-880-87 932-880-52 932-880-51 Treen Lisa Carole Bird Barbara A Trust Kim Sung Mee 18702 Maplewood Cir 18704 Maplewood Cir 18695 Maplewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1816 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1824 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1824 �7R /D —v v cIZ" label size 1°x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 __..nr_annioicn 09 1.8/09 1.90 AAAV oane alggedwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z jewaoi ap a1janbiI3 09G2/09 G9®faany qj!m algqedwoo„g/5 Z x«G azls legel 932-880-50 932-880-49 932-880-53 Kel man Stephen M & Diane L Andersen Evans Marta A Occupant Michelle 18714 Maplewood Cir 18722 Maplewood Cir 18712 Maplewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1824 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1823 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1824 932-880-54 932-880-55 932-880-56 Sisson Barbara A Occupant Moreland Virginia 18724 Maplewood Cir 18732 Maplewood Cir 18734 Maplewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1823 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1823 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1823 932-880-57 932-880-58 159-041-11 Rausa Anthony Parris Tucker A Herst Louise J 18742 Maplewood Cir 18744 Maplewood Cir 18372 Pammy Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1823 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1823 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1434 159-041-12 159-041-13 159-041-14 Gangemi Linda J Occupant De Leon Lamberto A& Elvirita R 18382 Pammy Ln 18392 Pammy Ln 18402 Pammy Ln Huntington Beach CA 92648-1434 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1434 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1436 159-041-15 157-352-03 157-352-03 Brown Dan S Occupant Occupant 18412 Pammy Ln 18301 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18301 Patterson Ln Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1436 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1688 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1688 157-352-03 157-352-03 157-352-02 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18301 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18301 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18302 Patterson Ln Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1688 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1688 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1686 157-352-02 157-352-02 157-352-02 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18302 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18302 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18302 Patterson Ln Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1686 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1686 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1686 157-352-04 157-352-04 157-352-04 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18311 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18311 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18311 Patterson Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1690 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1690 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1690 157-352-04 157-352-01 157-352-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18311 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18312 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18312 Patterson Ln Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1690 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1684 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1684 157-352-01 157-352-01 157-341-20 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18312 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18312 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18331 Patterson Ln Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1684 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1684 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1692 :�A to —Oc�p—, label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 09�2/09�9®(aany oane algl}odwoo ww�q x ww 9Z jowaol ap aj4anbli3 on 0919/0919®Aaany u1lM algl}odwoo„g/g Z x«i azls lagel 157-341-20 157-341-20 157-341-20 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18331 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18331 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18331 Patterson Ln Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1692 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1692 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1692 157-342-01 157-342-01 157-342-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18332 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18332 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18332 Patterson Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1682 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1682 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1682 157-342-01 157-342-02 157-342-02 Occupant Knight Stephen R Occupant 18332 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18342 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18342 Patterson Ln Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1682 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1680 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1680 157-342-02 157-342-02 157-341-19 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18342 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18342 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18351 Patterson Ln Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1680 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1680 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1694 157-341-19 157-341-19 157-341-19 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18351 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18351 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18351 Patterson Ln Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1694 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1694 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1694 157-341-18 157-341-18 157-341-18 Occupant Occupant Occupant Occup 18361 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18361 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18361 Patterson Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1696 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1696 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1696 157-341-18 157-341-17 157-341-17 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18361 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18371 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18371 Patterson Ln Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1696 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1672 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1672 157-341-17 157-343-02 157-341-17 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18371 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18371 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18372 Patterson Ln Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1672 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1672 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1670 157-343-02 157-343-02 157-343-02 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18372 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18372 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18372 Patterson Ln Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1670 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1670 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1670 157-341-16 157-341-16 157-341-16 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18381 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18381 Patterson Ln Unit 2 18381 Patterson Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1674 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1674 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1674 �� /v C�J label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery/55160/8160 f-fe` 09 L8/09 LSO faany oane alggedwoo ww 19 x ww gd 1ewao}ap a1anbl}3 09L8/09L9®43aAy ql!m olg!Iedwoo„g/5 Z x«L ozls lagel 157-341-16 157-343-01 157-343-01 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18381 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18382 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18382 Patterson Ln Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1674 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1668 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1668 157-343-01 157-343-01 157-341-15 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18382 Patterson Ln Unit 3 18382 Patterson Ln Unit 4 18391 Patterson Ln Unit 101 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1668 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1668 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1600 157-341-15 157-341-14 157-341-14 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18391 Patterson Ln Unit 102 18401 Patterson Ln Unit 1 18401 Patterson Ln Unit 2 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1600 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1662 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1662 157-341-13 157-341-13 157-341-13 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18409 Patterson Ln Unit A 18409 Patterson Ln Unit B 18411 Patterson Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1676 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1676 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1660 157-343-28 157-343-28 157-341-12 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18412 Patterson Ln Unit A 18412 Patterson Ln Unit B 18421 Patterson Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1666 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1666 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1660 157-343-28 157-343-28 157-341-12 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18422 Patterson Ln Unit A 18422 Patterson Ln Unit B 18425 Patterson Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1657 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1657 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1660 157-341-12 157-343-21 157-341-11 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18431 Patterson Ln 18432 Patterson Ln 18441 Patterson Ln Unit A Huntington Beach CA 92646-1660 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1664 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1678 157-341-11 157-341-11 157-343-21 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18441 Patterson Ln Unit B 18441 Patterson Ln Unit C 19442 Patterson Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1678 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1678 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1664 159-102-21 157-341-22 157-341-22 Gemini Five Llc/Occupant Occupant Occupant 18451 Patterson Ln Unit 101 18451 Patterson Ln Unit 102 7901 Professional Cir g Huntington Beach CA Huntington Beach CA Huntington Beach CA 92648-1901 159-102-20 159-102-19 159-102-18 Mc Kinley Peter W Pieratt Anita R Sharp Quinten 7911 Professional Cir 7921 Professional Cir 7931 Professional Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648-1901 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1901 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1901 /d label size 1°x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 - -- � 0918/09 G5®fa9ny oaAe 9lgl}edwco ww L9 x ww 9Z jewaoj op 9j9nbij3 e 09 2/0915®fa9Ay q}Inn 91gljedwoo„g/9 Z x j ozls 19gel 157-352-27 157-352-28 159-031-15 Uriarte Timothy John Stearns Vern &Susan E Occupant 18321 Roberta Cir 18322 Roberta Cir 18432 Steep Ln Unit 1 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1534 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1534 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1458 159-031-15 159-031-15 159-031-15 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18432 Steep Ln Unit 2 18432 Steep Ln Unit 3 18432 Steep Ln Unit 4 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1458 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1458 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1458 159-031-14 159-031-14 159-031-14 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18442 Steep Ln Unit 1 18442 Steep Ln Unit 2 19442 Steep Ln Unit 3 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1459 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1459 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1459 159-031-14 157-352-15 157-352-16 Occupant Dagostino Daniel A Occupant 18442 Steep Ln Unit 4 18301 Thomas Cir 18311 Thomas Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648-1459 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1552 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1552 157-352-19 157-352-17 157-352-18 Javaras Harry Mike & Maria Elena Whitaker Michael Hendrix Chris Jeffry 18312 Thomas Cir 18321 Thomas Cir 18322 Thomas Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1552 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1552 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1552 157-362-34 157-362-35 157-362-36 Ritter Janice Mari- Metivier Michel;�-_' Acosta James A-�� 18624 Valla r 18626 Valla:r-ta Dr 18628 Vaa{ai to Dr Huntin 'Beach CA 92646-1854 Huntin.`gton Beach CA 92646-1854 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1854 157-362-37 157-362-38 159-031-24 Van Doren Wayn� Adams Kathleen-Marie Occupant 18630 Val jrta-Dr 186332 Valiarta Dr 791�ea'chpoint Cir Bldg A Unit 21 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1854 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1854 Huntington Beach CA 92648 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery @15160/8160 09 i9/09 G9®A19AV oaAe alggedwoo ww Zg x ww gd 1ewao�op 9119nbij3 09 G9/091.9®band qj!m ajggedwoo«9/9 Z x j oz!s label so 159-031-18 157-341-04 932-890-26 Five Point Plaza Lic Reincke Lisa Marie Durgerian Michael S 2006 Trust 10537 Santa Monica Blvd#300 Po Box 34056 1670 Elevado Ave. Los Angeles CA 90025-4999 Las Vegas NV 89133-4056 Arcadia CA 91006-1820 932-880-19 932-880-74 932-880-73 Jost 1 William De Gelas Frank B Bruce Robert J Po Box 6157 3622 Venture Dr 5901 Broken Sound Pkwy Nw#300 Huntington Beach CA 92615-6157 Huntington Beach CA 92649-2538 Boca Raton FL 33487-2732 932-980-72 932-980-10 159-031-01 Duross Terry L Chisholm Heather Abel Howard L 19361 Maidstone Ln 1330 Santa Luisa Dr 5 Rue Fontaine Huntington Beach CA 92648-5505 Solana Beach CA 92075-1618 Newport Beach CA 92660-5204 157-352-05 157-341-01 159-031-24 Scott Center L P Vanags Maris E Trident Properties 3835 Birch St 1510 N State College Blvd 461 S Glassell St Newport Beach CA 92660-2616 Anaheim CA 92806-1207 Orange CA 92866-1905 157-341-01 159-031-22 930-034-35 a ris E Nicholson Leslie &Audrey Huntington Monterey 157,1eirn St Blvd 419 El Modena Ave 25871 Paseo Real CA 92806-12 Newport Beach CA 92663-5112 Monterey CA 93940-6644 930-034-36 930-034-45 930-034-47 Boodman Philip Hb Office Llc Thomas Keith 7284 Ainsley Dr 13924 Seal Beach Blvd#c 9834 Oscar Cir Huntington Beach CA 92648-6870 Seal Beach CA 90740-5376 Fountain Valley CA 92708-4616 157-341-03 157-341-05 159-031-08 Cole Cecelia P A Poon&Son Inc Turner Joseph A 5292 Duke Dr 2950 Harbor Blvd 18427 Beach Blvd La Palma CA 90623-1774 Costa Mesa CA 92626-3936 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1329 159-031-17 159-102-01 157-471-05 Beard Ronald P&Sunny Investments G &M Oil Co Lic Main Beach Llc Lic 16868 A Ln 10537 Santa Monica Blvd#350 15 Corporate Plaza Dr#240 Huntington Beach CA 92647-4831 Los Angeles CA 90025-3982 Newport Beach CA 92660-1300 159-102-43 157-471-06 157-471-31 Beach Center Partners Llc Jgtw Umc Llc 2301 Dupont Dr#100 Po Box 5697 18700 Beach Blvd#200 Irvine CA 92612-7503 Sherman Oaks CA 91413-5697 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2090 159-102-06 159-102-07 157-452-34 Bristow T W& K S Family Trust Golden Arch Ltd Partnership P A Poon &Son Inc 18651 Beach Blvd Po Box 3209 18822 Beach Blvd#103 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2003 Seal Beach CA 90740-2209 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2055 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 09 G9/09G5o(aany 09ne alggedwoo ww Lg x ww 5Z lewao}ap a4anbg3 " , 09 00915®�aanV ql!m algijedwoa,,8/9 Z x<<1.azls lapel 159-102-08 157-451-09 159-031-24 Mckenna Huntington Beach Advisor Llc Sr Trident Properties 10900 Firestone Blvd 9192 Anson River Cir 461 S Glassell St Norwalk CA 90650-2241 Fountain Valley CA 92708-4428 Orange CA 92866-1905 157-501-24 157-503-08 157-331-10 Bishop Of The Protestant Kowertz William Hall li Zulka Louis 18631 Chapel Ln 20592 Egret Ln 16862 Bolero Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1831 Huntington Beach CA 92646-5502 Huntington Beach CA 92649-3028 157-331-14 157-331-15 157-501-07 Payne Grover L Ohara Charles P& Mariko E Tams Spiro &Susan 18685 Main St#a-173 18830 Quince Cir 18532 Demion Ln#a Huntington Beach CA 92648-1723 Fountain Valley CA 92708-7242 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8822 157-502-04 157-501-08 157-502-05 Dady Properties Llc Long Gerald Kuo Donald T&Christina S Po Box 24187 3536 Sunglow Dr 12337 Palm St Los Angeles CA 90024-0187 Redding CA 96001-6143 Cerritos CA 90703-1818 157-501-09 157-502-06 157-501-10 Hodge Rowland Stanley Jr Boethling Kevin M Sugiyama Timothy Takeshi 17032 Lowell Cir 1931 S Robert Ln 307 N Torrens St Huntington Beach CA 92649-4212 Anaheim CA 92802-3318 Anaheim CA 92807-2956 157-502-07 157-501-11 157-502-08 Demion Re Holdings Llc Kawai Katsuji Yhrp Dev Llc 20322 Lighthouse Ln 9687 La Granada Ave 30136 Avenida De Calma Huntington Beach CA 92646-4416 Fountain Valley CA 92708-3526 Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275-4503 157-502-09 157-501-13 157-502-10 Surti Prafull J & Nalini P Zanetta Donald R Jenkins Donald L& Roberta Gail 8853 Mockingbird Cir 25 Thunder Trl 16563 Redwood Cir Fountain Valley CA 92708-5622 Irvine CA 92614-7419 Fountain Valley CA 92708-2320 157-501-14 157-502-11 157-501-15 Freeman Family Living Trust Loma Family Lp Bds &Partners Llc 119 Loma Ave 19182 Hamden Ln 1209 Manhattan Ave#130 Huntington Beach CA 92648-2700 Huntington Beach CA 92646-2135 Manhattan Beach CA 90266-4721 157-501-16 157-502-13 7-501-17 Kent Frederick P lii Mescher Doris L Vyse 18642 Demion Ln#a 2006 Nautilus Ln 1509 P ora Av Huntington Beach CA 92646-8838 Newport Beach CA 92660-3823 ngeles CA 90024-61 157-502-14 157-501-18 157-502-15 Oconnell Donna G Green Judith Cook Holman D& Marcia Dea 18141 Beach Blvd #380 18672 Demion Ln#a 13102 Lariat Ln Huntington Beach CA 92648-5698 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8834 Santa Ana CA 92705-2244 —00 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 091.8/09 G90/aany Dane elggedwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z jewiol ep a14anbl13 ® , ' 0918/091go faany q;!m alq.ijedwoo ,2/9 Z x«L azls label 157-501-19 157-502-16 157-501-20 Ganter Joan M Wang Joy Gan Long Butler Robert S 24022 Crossbill Cir 7400 Center Ave#108 911 W Bay Ave Laguna Niguel CA 92677-1734 Huntington Beach CA 92647-3039 Newport Beach CA 92661-1012 157-502-17 157-501-21 157-502-18 Aldama Joseph Butler Robert S Figueroa Wendy R Trust 9901 Solejar Dr 911 W Bay Ave 18721 Demion Ln#b Whittier CA 90603-1753 Newport Beach CA 92661-1012 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8856 157-501-22 157-502-19 157-501-23 Lee John J Liu Chun-yee &Su-hsing Witty Ann 8839 Eastheimer St 17515 Rio Ct 2918 Waverly Dr Houston TX 77064-3121 Rowland Heights CA 91748-4134 Los Angeles CA 90039-4104 159-042-15 159-042-16 159-042-17 Guirgis Family Trust Ursino Arlene B Lee William W 9132 Santiago Dr 1621 Quail Run 20402 Graystone Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-6341 Santa Ana CA 92705-7513 Huntington Beach CA 92646-5332 159-042-18 159-032-02 159-031-13 Lin Frank Thsai-ten Argandona Toby Patel Dilip& Ranjan 6821 Scenic Bay Dr 3302 Bounty Cir 1459 Forestview Dr Huntington Beach CA 92648-2619 Huntington Beach CA 92649-2806 Brea CA 92821-2043 159-031-12 157-341-08 157-471-32 Eckhouse David M Reincke Lisa Marie Huntington Beach Housing Associates 7901 Ellis Ave#4 Po Box 34056 8102 Ellis Ave Huntington Beach CA 92648-1665 Las Vegas NV 89133-4056 Huntington Beach CA 92646-8868 157-502-02 157-502-01 157-343-16 Richonne Marc Dorian &Judy F Fierro J Anthony Teraoka Tom T 1744 Paloma Dr Po Box 11283 17171 Marina View PI Newport Beach CA 92660-3741 Newport Beach CA 92658-5024 Huntington Beach CA 92649-4365 157-501-05 157-501-01 159-441-06 Richonne Judy C Church Faith Lutheran Of Huntington Kovacs Laszlo 4226 Maryland St Beach 572 18th St San Diego CA 92103-2332 8200 Ellis Ave Hermosa Beach CA 90254-2916 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1839 932-880-01 932-880-60 932-880-62 Chavez Jaime C&Cynthia D Hunter Kathryn I Strausburg Carol A 303 Napa Ct 18742 Elmwood Ln. 20857 N Circle Rd Fullerton CA 92833-3263 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1812 Rathdrum ID 83858-7857 932-880-61 159-092-07 159-102-46 Miller Dianne E Five Points Seniors L P Lin Albert 1102 Brewley Ln 2 Miranova PI 31 Half Moon Bay Dr Vista CA 92081-9026 Columbus OH 43215-5078 Corona Del Mar CA 92625-1039 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery/55160/8160 • / ._._ _ -- c_ .,C7 R.mrvOFlg=lRA 0918/09190 AaaAV oane olglledwoo ww ig x ww 9Z jewao�a a1anbl13 0918/09 G50 A]9AV qm agIedwoo ,8/9 Z x„G ozls iagel 159-102-45 157-342-03 157-343-03 Procter Trust Abdelfattah Fawzi& Rebheih Johnson T Elaine 11961 Kensington Rd 8091 Forelle Dr#1 939 W Bay Ave Rossmoor CA 90720-4420 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7714 Newport Beach CA 92661-1012 157-342-04 157-343-04 157-342-05 Tashiro Gerald Kan & Marsha I Houchen Marilyn O Jones Lorin S 9751 La Esperanza Ave 10366 Powderhorn River Ct 5723 Elaine Ct Fountain Valley CA 92708-3556 Fountain Valley CA 92708-5943 Plymouth CA 95669-9721 157-343-05 157-343-06 157-343-07 Miller John A Burris Stephen Durr Malilay Cavileyta B 22452 Melida 18141 Beach Blvd#380 27826 Holly Oak Ln Mission Viejo CA 92691-1708 Huntington Beach CA 92648-5698 Mission Viejo CA 92691-6636 157-342-08 932-880-97 932-880-98 Burris Stephen Durr Lind Sandra C Martin Steve &Brissa 18141 Beach Blvd#380 8161 Forelle Dr#2 8161 Forelle Dr#3 Huntington Beach CA 92648-5698 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7702 Huntington Beach CA 92646-7702 932-880-99 159-032-04 159-032-01 Alderman Kelly) Dean Mohammed & Bobbie Schindler Richard Jr&Janice 2024 Goldeneye PI 18 Lewis 17791 Santa Gertrudes Cir Costa Mesa CA 92626-4725 Irvine CA 92620-3362 Fountain Valley CA 92708-5022 159-042-04 159-042-03 159-042-02 Bewley Pension Paln Vitale Mark R Summers Family Trust 13215 Penn St#510 7822 Franklin Dr 7181 Carlton Ave Whittier CA 90602-1776 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1420 Westminster CA 92683-6101 157-343-08 157-345-03 157-343-10 Walker Margaret S Reade Craig A& Kelly K Borgstedt Trudy 18371 Goodwin Ln 18372 Goodwin Ln 17121 Kampen Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646-1650 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1651 Huntington Beach CA 92647-6015 157-345-05 157-471-10 157-471-29 Vu Hung T Gross Family Trust& Pauline M Li Ben 23e rwood Dr 8091 Graziadio Dr 19362 Baywater Ln Land TX 77479-8900 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1748 Huntington Beach CA 92646-2609 157-471-09 157-471-28 932-880-67 Kidd Everett Jackson Jr Kager Roswitha Kager C-exempti Bains Erin C 17842 Cardiff Cir 27 Santa Comba 8293 Laurelwood Dr#67 Huntington Beach CA 92649-4807 Irvine CA 92606-8899 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1814 932-880-66 932-880-65 932-880-64 Luquin R Maggie Rojas Mauzey Joshua & Nicole M Reid Merle L& Mary J 8295 Laurelwood Dr#66 19322 Waterbury Ln 8303 Laurelwood Dr#64 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1814 Huntington Beach CA 92646-2739 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1814 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 '_ ' -. /, � _ C+imia++o rlo forma+9F mm v F7 mm rmm�atihl❑avAr 01IPrV©�,iRl1/A1R(1 091.8/091-5®faany oane algl}edwoo ww Lg x ww gZ Iewaoi ap aj}anbij3 a Y 0918/0919®faany ql!m alglIedwoo„2/9 Z x<<G azis lagel 932-880-63 932-880-92 932-880-91 H Roach Daniel J Hill Irene Ramirez Adalberto 8325 Laurelwood Dr#91 8305 Laurelwood Dr#63 8323 Laurelwood Dr#92 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1814 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1813 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1813 932-880-89 932-880-88 932-880-90 Kuzniar Kristin M Barbour Peter G Pham Brandon Tan 8331 Laurelwood Dr#90 Po Box 2405 8335 Laurelwood Dr#88 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1813 Huntington Beach CA 92647-0405 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1813 157-471-15 157-471-13 157-471-14 Nguyen Hue Khanh Thi Seto Masayoshi G Cronk Robert F 38 Tidal Surf 18312 Hartlund Ln 11391 Bluebell Ave Newport Coast CA 92657-1905 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1563 Fountain Valley CA 92708-1707 157-471-12 157-471-17 157-471-16 Harshe Steven T&Lourdes J Jitsuan Llc Sanchez Nadine 18652 Libra Cir 18661 Libra Cir 5276 Chadwick Dr Huntington Beach CA 92646-1742 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1746 Huntington Beach CA 92649-3693 157-471-18 157-471-19 157-471-11 Wenzel Jack L Hrycenko Joseph M & Laura H Engel Terry C Po Box 130683 101 Windswept Way 13132 Buckingham Cir Big Bear Lake CA 92315-8974 Westminster CA 92683-1714 Mission Viejo CA 92692-5998 g 157-471-21 157-471-22 157-471-20 Bch Properties Llc Hafner Trust Floyd William Leonard Po Box 1674 16701 Greenview Ln 15352 Seine Cir g Whittier CA 90609-1674 Huntington Beach CA 92649-3710 Irvine CA 92604-3141 157-471-27 157-471-26 157-471-23 Yeh Roger Y T Last Sharon R Kao Edward Tsu-teh 2996 Ceylon Dr 9411 Darrow Dr 18732 Libra Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-7231 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1735 Costa Mesa CA 92626-3600' g 159-101-03 159-102-44 157-471-25 Graham Richard Alan Lee Patrick C Sarm Five Points Plaza Llc 225-1O8th Ave Ne#520 Po Box 206 11 San Garin Sunset Beach CA 90742-0206 Irvine CA 92606-8942 Bellevue WA 98004 159-102-30 159-102-35 159-091-04 Lim Becky S A Sarm Five Points Plaza Llc Whitehead Darrel R 218 9th St 1580 Brightwood St 225-1O8th Ave Ne#520 Montere Park CA 91754-5102 Bellevue WA 98004 Huntington Beach CA 92648-5024 Y 2-880-38 t 80-33 157-331-76 ohn E&SuBrace Anita J Maa eryl L9131 A ook St8251 Manifesto Cir n Grove CA -2608 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1619 ngton Beac C 92646-6320 v� /d --00 � label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 _ A-_,;(e)ci Qf)104n-n 09 G9/091g®A19AV oaAe algijedwoo ww Lg x ww gZ lewaoj ap 911mbl13 0918/09 L90 Ai@AV qj!m algliedwoo<<8/g Z x,,l azls lagel an 932-880-40 932-980-43 932-880-53 Vander Molen Milton J Parrish Daniel G &Tiffany A Comparsi Carolanne 9472 Mokihana Dr 17561 Roxanne Ln#a 403 16th St Huntington Beach CA 92646-7951 Huntington Beach CA 92647-8961 Huntington Beach CA 92648-4207 932-980-55 159-041-13 157-352-03 Spowart Carol D Alvarez Fidencio Grassi Fernando J 10353 Los Alamitos Blvd '18262 Pammy Ln 21932 Wakefield Ct Los Alamitos CA 90720-2110 Huntington Beach CA 92648-1432 Santa Clarita CA 91350-3970 157-352-02 157-352-04 157-352-01 Hsu Jack C Rothwell Thomas L Jr Mondegarian Rohinton J 17 Ravendale 5374 E Village Rd 1091 Glen Cir Irvine CA 92602-2450 Long Beach CA 90808-1634 Costa Mesa CA 92627-3908 157-342-01 157-341-19 157-341-18 Hays Melanie A Liu Chunghorng Richard Jeffries Christopher G 1285 Mcallister St Po Box 3882 18331 Patterson Ln#1 San Francisco CA 94115-4616 West Lafayette IN 47996-3882 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1692 157-341-17 157-343-02 157-341-16 Smekal Marie A Ag& Kg Llc Houchen Jerry D 8902 Crescent Dr Po Box 61262 7451 Warner Ave#e-321 Huntington Beach CA 92646-2206 Irvine CA 92602-6042 Huntington Beach CA 92647-5494 157-343-01 157-341-14 157-343-28 Schulz Apollonia Kaneko Tamio Antifora Vito E 1922 Park St 6561 Vesper Cir 6129 Capri Ct Huntington Beach CA 92648-2759 Huntington Beach CA 92647-2950 Long Beach CA 90803-4858 157-341-11 157-362-15 157-362-17 Newman Swanna 0 Anderson James E Rickling Richard A 1915 Mariners Dr 6662 Southampton Dr Po Box 90-330 Newport Beach CA 92660-4608 Cypress CA 90630-5480 Sun Valley ID 83353 157-362-21 157-362-23 157-362-07 Sinkey Manse Whalley Martin H & Eileen M Dreier W Lance Po Box 5241 19951 Felcliff Ln 715 Electric Ave Huntington Beach CA 92615-5241 Huntington Beach CA 92646-3924 Seal Beach CA 90740-6103 157-362-25 157-362-01 159-031-15 Platz Raymond A Bohlen Family Trust Smith Darin P 8641 Acapulco Cir 4802 Osborn Glade 5402 Old Pirate Dr Huntington Beach CA 92646-2601 San Antonio TX 78247-5843 Huntington Beach CA 92649-3608 159-031-14 157-352-15 157-331-69 R3 Properties 3 Dagostino Daniel A Huntington View Point 41 Via Malona 18301 Thomas Cir 12062 Valley View St#101 Rancho Palos Verdes CA 90275-4882 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1552 Garden Grove CA 92845-1738 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 419A o9Aa 9lq!jedwoo WW L9 x WW 5Z jawaoi 9p 9ttanb113 09 G8/09 G5® d x,, azls lagel 0918/0919®faeny ul!M algi�aduaoo„8/5 Z G 157-341-21 157-401-07 157-362-39 Tritz Property Management Huntington View Point Orange County Water District 1536 E.Warner Ave.Suite A 7400 Center Ave#205 Po Box 8300 Huntington Beach CA 92647-3068 Fountain Valley CA 92728-8300 Santa Ana CA 92705 �5� A �� label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 +ti nvan wary 0;i;n/Ri Rn 09�8/0915®Aaany oane alglledwoo ww L x ww Iewaoi a a an�ii 0918/091 tf yi, I .fie woa„ x`;,G azls a 932 880 38 932 880 33 1 157 501 17 Narodick, Ronald Owens Carol Anne Aldama Joseph 18634 Maplewood Cir 18643 Maplewood Cir 9901 Solejar Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 .Whittier, CA 90603 157 345 05 Vu Hung Tan 18392 Goodwin Ln I Huntington Beach, CA 92646 . I i I - i \I I '. j ! label size 1"r�2 / "room ati l with Av r—�� �.�18�-ea�wa�a�le.�r�trl.���rv�,�1q ��V,Q,G� 09 L8/0915®AaanV oane algl>.edwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z}ewaol ap aUanbl113 "a 09t•8/0915®AaanV gj!Nk algljedwoo ,9/9 Z x„l azls lapel The Peter Law Firm Hickey&Petchul, LLP Kate Tran 17011 Beach Blvd.Ste.900 David A.Wankel 18192 Hartlund Ln. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 114 Pacifica Ste. 340 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Irvine,CA 92618 157-363-16 157-363-17 157-363-17 Hoy Robert J & Lynette c c William H Gibbons 18505 Vallarta Dr. 8101 Dartmoor Dr. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 eac�CA:k' Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-363-15 157-363-18 157-363-14 Erika Sime Anthony Vendetta Occupant 18511 Vallarta Dr. 18512 Vallarta Dr. 18515 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-363-14 157-363-19 157-363-19 Stephen D Mc Clure Occupant 'Quang X Nguyen 13 Gema 18516 Vallarta Dr. 19122 Playa Dr. San Clemente,CA 92672 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 157-363-13 157-363-13 157-363-20 Occupant Brenda L Busch Eddie L Burgess 18521 Vallarta Dr. 8881 Dorsett Dr. 18522 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-363-12 157-363-21 157-363-21 Hassan Abdallah Occupant Richard L Horner 18525 Vallarta Dr. 18526 Vallarta Dr. 894 Auklet Ct. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Arroyo Grande, CA 93420 157-363-22 157-363-11 157-363-11 Nola Skyler , Occupant Robert L Eggink 18532 Vallarta Dr. 18535 Vallarta Dr. 19521 Pompano Ln. #112 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 157-363-23 157-363-10 157-363-24 Susan E Smalley Jimmy L Lovato Erika H Cestr 18536 Vallarta Dr. 18541 Vallarta Dr. 18542 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-363-09 157-363-25 157-363-08 Scott&Carola Pearlman Steven J Lee Gary R Tiedgen 18545 Vallarta Dr. 18546 Vallarta Dr. 18551 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 157-363-26 157-363-26 157-363-07 Occupant Brad Short Occupant 18552 Vallarta Dr. 1601 Seal Way 18555 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ^^ 09 G8/091- MV NAP aigqedwoo ww 19 x ww 9Z Iuwaoi ap allanbll3 fim 09G8/0919®Aaany qj!m algijcdwoo„g/5 Z x«G azls l9gei 157-363-27 157-363-06 157-363-28 James A. Dixon Peter Huegle Judith A. Branca 18556 Vallarta Dr. 18561 Vallarta Dr. 18562 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-363-29 157-363-29 157-363-05 Occupant Gerald A Duhonich John F. Oneill 18566 Vallarta Dr. 10091 Jon Day Dr. 18571 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 157-363-04 157-363-30 157-363-03 Kristine & Michael Carroll Jeanine Folley Charles G. Barkley 18575 Vallarta Dr. 18576 Vallarta Dr. 18581 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 157-363-31 157-363-02 157-363-62 Janet Williams Wayne A Ancher Monika Whitman 18582 Vallarta Dr. 18585 Vallarta Dr. 18586 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 157-363-01 157-363-33 157-363-34 Patrice A Mino Trust Craig E Ritter Pamela K.Shapiro 18591 Vallarta Dr. 18592 Vallarta Dr. 18596 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 157-363-35 157-363-36 157-363-37 Occupant Occupant Michael T.Jackson 18602 Vallarta Dr. 18606 Vallarta Dr. 18608 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 157-363-38 157-363-39 157-363-40 Mary Ellen Ellick Karen Crabtree Pauline Caravella 18610 Vallarta Dr. 18612 Vallarta Dr. 18614 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 157-363-41 157-363-31 157-363-32 Richard L King Occupant Occupant 18616 Vallarta Dr. 18618 Vallarta Dr. 18620 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA >-362-33 157-362-34 157-362-35 a Ritter Janice MarieMetivier Michele D ta 18624 Vallarta Dr. 18626 Vallarta Dr. Beach, CA 926 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 157-362-36 157-362-37 157-362-38 Acosta James A Van Doren Wayne Adams Kathleen Marie 18628 Vallarta Dr. 18630 Vallarta Dr. 18632 Vallarta Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646, Huntington Beach,CA 92646 ��� A0 T label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ^^ 09 G9/09 i 9®taany oane algijedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z tewiol ap allanb113 09 G9/09 G90[Uany qm algljedwoo„9/9 Z x«G azis label so 157-362-01 157-362-01 157-362-02 Occupant Bohlen Family Trust Sanders John R 18591 Pueblo Cir. 4802 Osborn Glade 18585 Pueblo Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 San Antonio,TX 78247 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-362-03 157-362-04 .157-362-05 Derigo Lewie P&Crystal &Denine Occupant Orsino Frank J 18581 Pueblo Cir. 18575 Pueblo Cir. 18571 Pueblo Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-362-06 157-362-07 157-362-07 Roth Roland Henry Occupant Dreier W Lance 18565 Pueblo Cir. 18555 Pueblo Cir. 715 Electric Ave. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Seal Beach, CA 90740 157-362-08 157-362-09 157-362-10 Burns Karen L Defeo Steven M Occupant 18551 Pueblo Cir 18545 Pueblo Cir. 18541 Pueblo Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-362-11 157-362-12 157-362-19 Occupant Hitt Kenneth L Mc Ilroy Marlene A 18535 Pueblo Cir. 18531 Pueblo Cir. 18532 Pueblo Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-362-20 157-362-21 157-362-21 Tenpasbell Kimberly Occupant Sinkey Manse 18536 Pueblo Cir. 18542 Pueblo Cir. Po Box 5241 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 157-362-22 157-362-23 157-362-23 Estill Bradford W Occupant Whalley Martin H & Eileen M 18546 Pueblo Cir 18552 Pueblo Cir. 19951 Felcliff Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-362-24 157-362-25 157-362-25 Luft Linda D Trust Platz Raymond A Occupant 18562 Pueblo Cir 8641 Acapulco Cir. 18566 Pueblo Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 1 - 62-26 157-362-27 157-362-28 Ramirez <9264 p Kendrick Chuch &Laurel Kornoff John Jay&Jane W 18572 P it 18576 Pueblo Cir. 18582 Pueblo Cir. H gton Beach, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-362-29 157-362-30 157-362-13 Miles Michael S &Stacey L H Horton Victor R Brummel Richard 18586 Pueblo Cir. 18592 Pueblo Cir. 18511 Pueblo Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 fJan cane a I}edwoo ww L9 x ww gZ}ewJo a a11anbl1 09G8/09190 V Iq d p 3 0918/09 G9®AJanV ql!m algIjedwoo„g/g Z x«L ozls lagel 157-362-14 157-362-15 157-362-15 Clarke Jacquelyn C Anderson James E Occupant 18509 Pueblo Cir. 6662 Southampton Dr. 18507 Pueblo Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Cypress, CA 90630 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-362-16 157-362-17 157-362-17 Hogue William E & Pamela J Rickling Richard A Occupant 18508 Pueblo Cir. Po Box 90-330 18510 Pueblo Cir. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Sun Valley, ID 83353 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 157-362-18 157-362-15 157-362-14 Adamkiewicz Andrzey Occupant :1�85 ue18512 Pueblo Cir. 18507 Pueblo Cir. 09 0 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ington Beach,CA 46 157-362-12 157-362-11 157-362-10 Hitt Ke L Occupant Occupant 18531 P o C1 . 18535 Pueblo Cir. 18541 Pueblo Cir. ington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 157-362-09 7-362-08 157-362-07 Defeo Ste Burns I a Occupant 18545 eblo Cir. 18551 P o Cir. 18555 Pueblo Cir. tington Beach, CA 92 ington Beach, CA 9264 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 7-362-06 157-362-26 157-362-27 Roth o He Ramirez Andre M & Dyer Ashley N K ck Chuc el 18565 P o i . 18572 Pueblo Cir. 18576 ington Beach CA 2646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 ngton Beach,CA 2646 157-362-28 7-362-30 Kornoff John Ja ne W Ho for 1858 o Cir. 18592 P tington Beach, CA 92646 ngton Beach, CA label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 ; •N• �._ �i._.._u_ �_i..-...•._a nr r-7..•...•...,,....,..F{F.In..inn A,,n—®Dian1QI9n 09G8/0915®Aaany oane olgp dwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z}owaoj ap 9�anbll3 W1096S .IaSel 09G2/09G9@ AaaAV qm algqodwoo«8/5 Z x,,G azls l6gol slagej SSa1PPV OA" 157 363 17 157 363 33 Dccupant Ritter, Craig L 8506 Vallarta Dr. 18592 Vallarta Dr Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 i 2�1d size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 Ftiniiatta rla fnrmat 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery°5160/8160 .. S138UC Dana tlIOEDEtlC 09 009 L5@ fa9Ay 09Ae 9lgljedwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z tewjoi 9p 9jj9nbi13 09 L8/09 L5®fa9Ay ql!m 9lgpedwoo„9/5 Z x<<L 9zls i9gel an , 932-880-26 932-880-27 932-880-25 Occupant Friedman Nancy Hatch Daniel W 18631 Applewood Cir 18632 Applewood Cir 18633 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1859 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1860 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1859 932-880-28 932-880-24 932-880-29 Hill David A Williams Daniel Lorenzo Jr Jukes Robert A 18634 Applewood Cir 18641 Applewood Cir 18642 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1860 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1859 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1860 932-880-23 932-880-30 932-880-31 Moffett Helga B Haddad Peter N &Tina A Mocny Daniel J 18643 Applewood Cir 18644 Applewood Cir 18646 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1859 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1860 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1860 932-880-22 932-880-77 932-880-21 Bennett James T&Sandra L Shelton Diann Arena Caroline A/Occupant 18661 Applewood Cir 18662 Applewood Cir 18663 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1858 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1861 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1858 932-880-76 932-880-20 932-880-75 Goff Robert& Patricia Davis Susan L Francisco P Living Trust/Occupant 18664 Applewood Cir 18671 Applewood Cir 18672 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1861 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1858 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1861 932-880-19 932-880-74 932-880-73 Occupant Occupant Occupant 18673 Applewood Cir 18674 Applewood Cir 18676 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1858 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1861 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1861 932-880-15 932-880-72 932-880-16 Sell William L Occupant Liu David S 18681 Applewood Cir 18682 Applewood Cir 18683 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1857 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1862 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1857 932-880-71 932-880-17 932-880-70 Nehls Carol A Allan Donna Anne King Edgar Joseph 18684 Applewood Cir 18691 Applewood Cir 18692 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1862 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1857 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1862 932-880-18 932-880-69 932-880-68 Dotlich Daniel J & Parker Linda C Wetz Jack &Carolyn Thorpe Sylvia Wood 18693 Applewood Cir 18694 Applewood Cir 18696 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1857 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1862 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1862 932-880-14 932-880-13 932-880-12 Degenhardt Meta M Albergo Marie Living Trust Franusiak Walter 18701 Applewood Cir 18703 Applewood Cir 18711 Applewood Cir Huntington Beach CA 92646-1856 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1856 Huntington Beach CA 92646-1856 --00 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery/55160/8160 �� //? _ Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 W1096S lasal slagal ssaippv 0AU3AW 157 363 17 157 363 33 Occupant Ritter, Craig 18506 Vallarta Dr. 18592 Vallarta Dr Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 41 /D GO wlsI,3a4S PaaA 410OWS 09f8/09 G9®Aaany oane aigijedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ tewaoj ap aganbq 09L8/09l•9®la9ny ql!m aigljedwoo„g/g Z x j azis lagel • 932 880 38 932 880 33 157 501 17 Narodick, Ronald Owens Carol Anne Aldama Joseph 18634 Maplewood Cir 18643 Maplewood Cir 9901 Solejar Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Whittier, CA 90603 157 345 05 Vu Hung Tan 18392 Goodwin Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646 ' I I label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-05 l t✓ s°* ,r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BEACH A N/// D ELLIS MIXED . USE/PROJECT n r� / I Im' ort act Rep Envir® p 0 EIR No. 10-004 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 1 f Prepared for City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department / 2000 Main Street,Third Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 Prepared by J Atkins / 12301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 430 %f Los Angeles, California 90025 i i November 2011 Exhibit"A" - Resolution No.2012-05 Mitig-a-fioh -Mon' floring and, Reporting Pro groA INTRODUCTION The Final Environmental Impact Report for Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project (State Clearinghouse # 2011091022) identified mitigation measures to reduce the adverse effects ofthe project in the areas of. aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, public services, transportation/traffic, utilities and service systems,and greenhouse gases. i' The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires :that agencies adopting environmental impact reports ascertain that feasible mitigation measures are implemented, subsequent to project approval. Specifically, the lead or responsible agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring program for mitigation measures incorporated into a project or imposed,"as conditions of approval. The program must be designed to ensure compliance during applicable project timing, e.g. design, construction, or operation (Public Resource Code Section 21081.6). Code Requirements (CRs) that were identified in the Draft EIR are required to be implemented as a result of existing City code and are not considered mitigation measures. Therefore, CRs would be implemented,'for the Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project but these do not require monitoring activity, and are not Iincluded in this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting 1F Program(MMRP). / r The MMRP shall be used by City of Huntington Beach staff responsible for ensuring compliance with mitigation measures associated with the/Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project. Monitoring shall consist of review of appropriate documentation;°such as plans or reports prepared by the party responsible for implementation or by field observation of the mitigation measure during implementation. The following table identifies the mitigation measures by resource area. The table also provides the specific mitigation monitoring requirements, including implementation documentation, monitoring activity, timing and responsible monitoring party. Verification of compliance with each measure is to be indicated by signature of the mitigation monitor,together with date of verification. r The Project Applicant rd the Applicant's Contractor shall be responsible for implementation of all mitigation measures,unless otherwise noted in the table. City of Huntington Beach,Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR e e e e e a -e Mffl• • • O • m • O O m OProgram j Implementation Responsible Vedlicafion Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity riming. Monitor. Signature Date -n, ..,� _ �,.. ,. a^�^ r�F. ,�ffi rt,. ,. t. ..� " , .� �`` �,;r"' VtF+�?is+ n`l n a 1 41:AESTHETICSF; w hr . r,3�tw , ,.' P ���:,ar. BECSP MM4.1-2 Pioposed new structures shall be designed to maximize Building plans Review and Plan check prior to Planning the use of non-reflective fagade treatments, such as matte paint or glass approve building issuance of coatings.Prior to issuance of building permits for the proposed project,the plans for inclusion building permit Applicant shall indicate provision of these materials on the building plans. vt s r x ' ;; . r4:2AIFQWAL'ITY �,; ,n < art{ j'([�5� .� se' ©u i nufi�B.Mf .,v, ,fe�ai.''N 3 Wiz' . _ a 9+ BECSPyMM4.2-1 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that all diesel-powered equipment used will be retrofitted with after- notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a treatment products(e.g.,engine catalysts).Contract specifications-shall be specifications and grading permit included in project construction documents,which shall be reviewed by the grading plans for City of Huntington Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. \" inclusion BECSP MM4.2-2 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract I��nguage and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that all heavy-duty diesel-powered equipment operating and refueling at notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a the project site use low-NOx diesel fuel to the extent that it is readily t specifications and grading permit available and cost effective(up to 125 percent of the cost of California Air rading plans for Resources Board diesel)in the South Coast Air Basin(this does not apply inclusion to diesel-powered trucks traveling to and from the project site). Contract specifications shall be included in project construction documents, which �y shall be reviewed by the City of Huntington Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. ., cr BECSP MM4.2-3 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan,check prior to Planning y that construction equipment engines be maintained in good condition and notes on grading plans approve contract issuance ofa in proper tune per manufacturer's specification for the duration of specifications and grading permit,.., 7y construction. Contract specifications shall be included in project grading plans for `� construction documents,which shall be reviewed by the City of Huntington inclusion ° Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. "w� 0 o' BECSP MM4.2-4 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning-1 z that construction operations rely on the electricity infrastructure notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a surrounding the construction site rather than electrical generators powered specifications and grading permit ` No by internal combustion engines.Contract specifications shall be included in grading plans for project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City of inclusion o Huntington Beach prior to issuance of a grading permit. 2 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project*EIR •o 0 0 0 0 • a - e e o e• e • • • • • • • - • • • e e orn 'Miti• Compliance Implementation Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation MoniforingAdivity aiming Monitor Signature Date BECSP MM4.2-5 As required by South Coast Air Quality Management Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning District Rule 403—Fugitive Dust,all construction activities that are capable notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a of generating fugitive dust are required to implement dust control measures specifications and grading permit during each phase of project develbpment to reduce the amount of grading plans for particulate matter entrained in the ambient air.-These measures include the inclusion following: 4 s Application of soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas ■ Quick replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas s Watering of exposed surfaces three times daily u ■ Watering of all unpaved haul roads three times daily ■ Covering all stock piles with tarp ■ Reduction of vehicle speed on unpaved roads ` ■ Post signs on-site limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less w , ■ Sweep streets adjacent to the project site at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent roads ■ Cover or have water applied to the exposed surface of all trucks Aga- hauling dirt,sand,soil,or other loose materials prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas , ■ Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads Y onto paved roads to wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the `4 site each trip ''`a.,. CD BECSP MM4.2-6 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning 0 that construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a "t. motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in and construction plans specifications and grading permit Z use for more than 30 minutes. Diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles grading plans and o with gross vehicular weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds shall be construction plans N turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes.Contract specifications for inclusion shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which o U shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. �l s City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR e e • e • e e a - o e a e• e e s o 0 o e o o • • • e • • Compliance z Implementation Responsible Verification MfigationMeasure Documentation Monitoring Activity riming Monitor Signature Date BECSP MM4.2-7 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that construction parkirig�,be configured to minimize traffic interference notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a during the construction period.and, therefore, reduce idling of traffic. and construction plans specifications and grading permit Contract specifications shall be.o.,gincluded in the proposed project grading plans and construction documents,which shall be,ap�proved by the City of Huntington construction plans Beach. for inclusion BECSP MM4.2-8 Project applicants shall require by°contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that temporary traffic controls are provided, such as a flag,person, during notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a all phases of construction to facilitate smooth traffic flow. Contract and construction plans specifications and grading permit specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction grading plans and documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. construction plans for inclusion BECSP MM4.2-9 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that construction activities that would affect traffic flow on the arterial notes on`grading plans approve contract issuance of a system be scheduled to off-peak hours (10:00 AM to 4:00 PM). Contract and construction.plans specifications and grading permit specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction `' grading plans and documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. ;,construction plans for-<inclusion BECSP MM4.2-10 Project applicants shall require by contract Contract language and Review and, Plan check prior to Planning �y specifications that dedicated on-site and off-site left-turn lanes on truck notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a hauling routes be utilized for movement of construction trucks and and construction plans specifications and,:,_ grading permit a equipment on site and off site to the extent feasible during construction grading plans and activities.Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction plans construction documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington for inclusion Beach. 0 .. . z 0 O N 4 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR o s s e o e s a -s e • e e o Compliance Implementation Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Monitor Signature Date BECSP•.,.ININ4.2-11 Upon issuance of building or grading permits, Mail to owners and Obtain confirmation Plan check prior to Planning whichever`is issued earlier, notification shall be mailed to owners and occupants within 300 that mailing to issuance of a occupants of all developed land uses within 300 feet of a project site within feet of project site a owners and grading or building the Specific Plan providing a schedule for major construction activities that notice regarding major occupants took permits,which, will occur through the duration of the construction period. In addition, the construction activities place occur earlier notification will include the identification and contact number for a community liaison and designated`construction manager that would be available on site to monitor construction: activities. The construction manager shall be responsible for complying with-all project requirements related to PMio generation.The construction managerwill be located at the on-site construction office during construction hours for the-duration of all construction activities. Contract information for the community-liaison and construction manager will be located at the construction office, City-,Hall, the police department,and a sign on site. BECSP ININ4.2-12 Project applicants shall require by contract Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning specifications that the architectural coating (paint and primer) products notes oh-construction approve contract issuance of a used would have a VOC rating of 125 grams per liter or less. Contract plans specifications and building permit specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction construction plans documents, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City of "<.for inclusion Huntington Beach. BECSP ININ4.2-13 Project applicants shall require by contract Contract language and Review and\ Plan check prior to Planning 6 specifications that materials that do not require painting be used during notes on construction approve contract issuance of a r* construction to the extent feasible.Contract specifications shall be included plans specifications and-,-, building permit y in the proposed project construction documents,which shall be reviewed construction plans and approved by the City of Huntington Beach. for inclusion BECSP ININ4.2-14 Project applicants shall require by contract Contract language and Review and Plan check--prior to Planning o specifications that pre-painted construction materials be used to the extent notes on construction approve contract issuance of feasible. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project plans specifications and building permit construction documents,which shall be reviewed and approved by the City construction plans Z of Huntington Beach. for inclusion :: °� N City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 5 e• o e e e • a - e e a e• e Mitidpti6 onitoring • • - e • • • s • Compliance Implementation Responsible Veriffcation Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Monitor Signature Date Project Mfril4:2-15 Project applicants shall require by contract Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning specifications that a paving be completed as soon as possible to reduce notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a fugitive dust emissions.'``° and construction plans specifications and grading permit grading plans and construction plans for inclusion r. ...sr-. ...,.. w. .•sw „�� m. �e�i tt.:rx,.. ,.>..w ��rt."`+'.. }r.� 3 r 1. - t,:t,,• ' bw,� 4.3$IOLOGICAL RES,OURGES'` �{ ' ,'. 9� O -I:v. 3�..a¢�c: O i=.'�x°cc,. �':s. .:. v, 1•" .� f"" ,:s-.°'.,.; t-. �..�-:. aiwr?tu.E= ¢�, 't 2' .c'�'n: t�, ? �w;� . a�7�. a�''.,x t,` `; .a�"' t�;.% BECSP MM4.3-1 Nesting avian species protected by the MBTA: Developer shall submit Review grading Plan check prior to Planning a. Prior to any construction or vegetation removal between-February 15 construction schedule plans for inclusion issuance of a and August 31,a nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified (including grading grading permit biologist of all habitats within 250 feet of the construction area. activities)as evidence Surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days and no more than of construction overlap 30 days prior to commencement of construction activities and surveys with breeding season. will be conducted in accordance with CDFG protocol as applicable.If If construction occurs Review field survey, During Planning no active nests are identified on or within 250 feet of the construction during relevant, if necessary construction site,no further mitigation is necessary.A copy of the pre-construction breeding,developer survey shall be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach.If an active shall present a survey`s,As necessary nest of a MBTA protected species is identified on site(per established report(prepared by a pursuant to field thresholds)a 100-foot no-work buffer shall be maintained between the consultant approved survey,review and nest and construction activity.This buffer can be reduced in by the City)to the City approve ' consultation with CDFG and/or USFWS.Completion of the nesting prior to issuance of a recommendations `! cycle shall be determined by qualified ornithologist or biologist. grading permit.If and any other relevant documentd f nests are found,b. Completion of the nesting cycle shall be determined by qualified 3: ornithologist or biologist, developer shall submit per this mitigation ' plans identifying nest `= locations and limits of o construction activities. O O e O {1 6 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR P.R. F.Rr0 • o o • -•e o 0 0 Mitigat • • e e • O 0 0 • Yr.ograrn Compliance Implementation Responsible Verification MifigationMeasure 7Documentaffon MonffonngActh* riming MonBor Slgnature Date : ..�.+-,rv- i:w�,3u:�} e;+eap .-rg�'.'2"J3.tii3 -� $r. .wx r,"',•_ rv-t',.- �` z'!f4-.y ,trc ,.r k w ` ,:.,; ` �..''d.'.tv^'::v ,ram.'. ri' 9 _ "` , -.+3��M1„'` •_ ':h '„4�"f m"a.Cr',`F.t._ fr.. .ri y�4.4.CULTURAL RE 0 iF � d •��5, ,�,K,..�.T*� "�', �i? ��, ���F��-�+' �''"»{�i"i..>�.k�;;�,Erg,�.k,:�.mz:*�s,.k�u*a:+��ac:r� k�����:�.���-a�a'`�it..s�'�ck,��',��-�✓ .�.� .v��z��' ..����'� -s�', �,,��v�fi;: ��xr�-rcc BECSP MM4.4-1 Pfior to development activities that would demolish or Proof of retention of Verify retention of Plan check prior to Planning otherwise physically affect.buildings or structures 45 years old or older or an historical resource qualified historical issuance of affect their historic setting,"the-project applicant shall retain a cultural professional to resource demolition or resource professional who meets the Secretary of the Interior's determine potential professional grading permit, Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History to determine significance of whichever occurs if the project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance structure 45 years old earlier of a historical resource as defined in Section.15064.5 of the CEQA or older Guidelines. The investigation shall include, as det4mined appropriate by the cultural resource professional and the City of Huntington Beach, the Preparation of a Review and appropriate archival research, including, if necessary, an updated records technical report or approve technical search of the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC),of the memorandum report or California Historical Resources Information System and a pedes6ian., documenting the result memorandum. survey of the proposed development area to determine if any significant of historical resources historic-period resources would be adversely affected by the proposed If determined investigation. development. The results of the investigation shall be documented in a necessary,verify technical report or memorandum that identifies and evaluates any historical that project resources within the development area and includes recommendations and applicant has methods for eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources. The implemented technical report or memorandum shall be submitted to the City of methods identified Huntington Beach for approval. As determined necessary by the City, in the technical 1. Cr environmental documentation (e.g., CEQA documentation) prepared for report or future development within the project site shall reference or incorporate the memorandum'for;, findings and recommendations of the technical report or memorandum. reducing impacts on,., Y The project applicant shall be responsible for implementing methods for historical resources ' eliminating or reducing impacts on historical resources identified in the technical report or memorandum. O o. z O N rr N i O City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 7 e• e e e e o a Mitigation • • • • • - • • o o • o Compliance Implementation Responsible- Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity 17ming Monitor Signature Date BECSP NfAl t2(b) If evidence of an archaeological site or other Proof of retention of Verify retention of Throughout Planning suspected historical resource as defined by CEQA Guidelines archaeological qualified ground disturbing Section 15064.5, including darkened soil representing past human activity professional to archaeological activities ("midden"), that could conceal material remains(e.g., worked stone, fired determine if a professional,if clay vessels,faunal bone,hearths,,, storage pits,or burials)are discovered substantial adverse necessary,and during any project-related earth-disturbing activities(including projects that change would occur to complete would not encounter undisturbed soils)"all earth-disturbing activity within an archaeological documentation 100 feet of the find shall be halted and the Cityaof Huntington Beach shall resource be notified.The project applicant shall retain an aar haeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualificatoi as-_Standards for Archaeology to assess the significance of the find. Impacts to any significant resources shall be mitigated to a less-than-significant-level through data recovery or other methods determined adequate by theme archaeologist and that are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archaeological Documentation. Any identified cultural resources shall be recorded on the appropriate DPR 523 (A-L)form and filed with the appropriate Information Center. BECSP MM4.4-3(b)Should paleontological resources(i.e.,fossil remains) Proof of retention of ,Verify retention of Throughout Planning be identified at a particular site during project construction,the construction paleontological qualified ground disturbing foreman shall cease construction within 100 feet of the find until a qualified professional to paleontological activities t,y professional can provide an evaluation.Mitigation of resource impacts shall determine if a professional,jf be implemented and funded by the project applicant and shall be substantial adverse necessary conducted as follows: change would occur to 1. Identify and evaluate paleontological resources by intense field survey resource paleontological where impacts are considered high resource 2. Assess effects on identified sites 3. Consult with the institutional/academic paleontologists conducting research investigations within the geological formations that are slated to be impacted o 4. Obtain comments from the researchers 5. Comply with researchers'recommendations to address any significant adverse effects where determined by the City to be feasible In considering any suggested mitigation proposed by the consulting ` paleontologist,the City of Huntington Beach staff shall determine whether g City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR `44 e e e o o • e o - •• a e o • • e s s • • s e s • • • o Compliance Implementation Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Monitor'' Signature Date av idan�s necessary and feasible in light of factors such as the nature of the find, project design, costs, applicable policies and land use assumptions, and,,other considerations. If avoidance is unnecessary or infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) shall be instituted. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for paleontological resources is carried out. ° GYANDSOILS='- i ,. fi, x= # ti Hsu um 11rr , < �a?�'C':.L»2.i ,. .r�.,t<,._., 8 �' it4'4u °'' a. . t t +. .� � +, � -N.. Sa. e.51q�;Y"..L�,�.....ck �.'k%'d�Sik�E�,.o�k"..G7r:k',um�:>av�...V'�.r" �ii,'�:- .,,«, ay........- k..� -,:� a .. ,. .. _.,,. , ._,a..:... ;M1h:.f'�.. ... BECSP MM4.5-1 Future development in the Beach`Boulevard and Edinger Soils and geotechnical Review and Plan check prior to Public Works Avenue Corridors Specific Plan area shall prepare a-grading plan to analysis and notes on approve grading issuance of a Building and contain the recommendations of the final soils and geotechnical report. grading plan and and building plans grading permit Safety These recommendations shall be implemented in the design of the project, building plans for inclusion of final including but not limited to measures associated with site preparation fill, soils and placement, temporary shoring and permanent dewatering, groundwater geotechnical seismic design features,excavation stability,foundations,soil stabilization, recommendations establishment of deep foundations,concrete slabs and pavements,surface drainage, cement type and corrosion measures, erosion control, shoring ' and internal bracing,and plan review. '-i �s 1 O y� 0. qa z o N City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR l 9 -Mitigatipn Monitoring,and, Repprting Prograhl Compliance Implementation Responsible- Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Monitor Signature Date ,"�+w�';� 4.6HAZARDS AND HAZARDOOS;MAT,ERIALS ;.(F',•:t'^uis.:cs;4,�L"z;defm"a:,'-Y.. xizei.,....,.. -ill.. .nr s�.<e, BECSP MIM4.6-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits on any project Preparation of Review technical Plan check prior to Fire site,the site developers)shall: technical documentations, issuance of documentation to and,as necessary, demolition or ■ Investigate the project site to determine whether it or immediately address site specific review and approve grading permits, adjacent areas have a record of hazardous material contamination via hazards;Risk closure reports whichever occurs the preparation of a preliminary environmental site assessment(ESA), Management Plan and earlier which shall be submitted to the City for review:lficontamination is Site Health and Safety found the report shall characterize the site according to the nature and Plan extent of contamination that is present before developmenractivities precede at that site. ■ If contamination is determined to be on site,the City,in accordance with appropriate regulatory agencies,shall determine the need for further investigation and/or remediation of the soils conditions on the contaminated site.If further investigation or remediation is required,it shall be the responsibility of the site developer(s)to complete such investigation and/or remediation prior to construction of the project. ■ If remediation is required as identified by the local oversight agency,it + , shall be accomplished in a manner that reduces risk to below applicable standards and shall be completed prior to issuance of any occupancy permits. a' ■ Closure reports or other reports acceptable to the Huntington Beach Fire Department that document the successful completion of required -" Y remediation activities,if any,for contaminated soils,in accordance with po City Specification 431-92,shall be submitted and approved by the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to the issuance of grading o permits for site development.No construction shall occur in the affected area until reports have been accepted by the City. z O_ O 10 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR, e• • o o • • • -o e a o• e Aitigation Monit.orillig C1hA,R,0,pqrtin.g, Program Compliance implementation Responsible Verfication Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity riming Monitor Signature Date BECSP'MM4.6-2 In the event'that previously unknown or unidentified soil Risk Management Review and Plan check prior to Fire and/or groundwater contamination that could present a threat to human Plan approve any issuance of any health or the environment is encountered during construction of the and grading plans for grading permit and proposed project, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the Site Health and Safety inclusion during contamination shall cease immediately. If contamination is encountered, a Plan construction Risk Management Plan shall °be__ prepared and implemented that (1)identifies the contaminants of concern and the potential risk each contaminant would pose to human healtli"and the environment during construction and post-development and (2)describes measures to be taken to protect workers, and the public from exposure-to potential site hazards. Such measures could include a range of options, including, but not limited to, physical site controls during construction, remediation long- term monitoring, post-development maintenance or access limitations,or ,_ some combination thereof. Depending on the nature of contamination, if any, appropriate agencies shall be notified (e.g.,City of Huntington Beach Fire Department). If needed, a Site Health and Safety Plan that meets Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements shall be prepared and in place prior to commencement of work in any contaminated area. BECSP MM4.6-3 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, future Methane Testing Plan Review and., Prior to Fire development in the Specific Plan shall comply with HBFD City approval of testing commencement of Specification No. 429, Methane District Building Permit Requirements. A plan .. sampling plan for the testing of soils for the presence of methane gas shall be Notes on building and Review and Prior,to issuance Fire a prepared and submitted by the Applicant to the HBFD for review and methane plans approve building of any grading approval, prior to the commencement of sampling. If significant levels of and methane gas permit and duringy methane gas are discovered in the soil on the future development project plans for construction site, the Applicant's grading, building and methane plans shall reference O appropriate that a sub-slab methane barrier and vent system will be installed at the R documentation project site per City Specification No. 429, prior to plan approval. If a required by the HBFD, additional methane mitigation measures to reduce Z the level of methane gas to acceptable levels shall be implemented. 0 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR •• e e e s o o - e e a s e e Mitigatioft Mohitoring'qnd, • • • Prod,rairn Compliance Implementation Responsible Vertfication Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Montior Signature Date BECSP 4.6-4 To ensure adequate access for emergency vehicles Prepare construction Plan check prior to Prior to approval Fire,Police when constr ion activities would result in temporary lane or roadway roadway plans grading or building of grading or closures, the de er shall consult with the City of Huntington Beach permits,whichever building permits, Police and Fire Dep ents to disclose temporary lane or roadway occurs earlier whichever occurs closures and alternative tr et routes. The developer shall be required to earlier keep a minimum of one lane in h direction free from encumbrances at all times on perimeter streets access, the project site.At any time only a single lane is available, the developer sh'all4rovide a temporary traffic signal,signal carriers(i.e.,flagpersons),or other—appropriate traffic controls to allow travel in both directions. If constluction"etivities require the complete closure of a roadway segment, the developer'$h I coordinate with the City of Huntington Beach Police and Fire Depa rnents to designate proper detour routes and signage indicating alternative routes. _ . #: MM MIS r ;�7 HYDROLOGYU%11dDVIIATERQUALI let, iRl TY < BECSP MM4.7-1 City of Huntington Beach shall require Applicants for new Water Qut Review and Prior to receiving a Public Works development and significant redevelopment projects within the Specific Management Ian approve WQMP precise grading Plan area, including the proposed project, to prepare a project Water permit Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with the DAMP requirements and measures described below and with all current adopted permits. The WQMP shall be prepared by a Licensed Civil Engineer and submitted for review and acceptance prior to issuance of a Precise Cr Grading or Building permit. BMPs in the WQMP shall be designed in accordance with the Municipal NPDES Permit, Model WQMP, Technical Guidance Documents, DAMP, ' and City of Huntington Beach LIP. As noted in the Specific Plan, all development projects shall include site design and source control BMPs in 0 the project WQMP. Additionally, new development or significant redevelopment projects and priority projects shall include LID principles to � reduce runoff to a level consistent with the maximum extent practicable s o and treatment control BMPs in the WQMP. N If permanent dewatering is required and allowed by the City,the developer N shall submit an application to RWQCB and follow the procedures as stated b in Order No R8-2009-0003.The Applicant shall include a description of the 4 `" dewatering technique, discharge location, discharge quantities, chemical characteristics of discharged water,operations and maintenance plan,and 12 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed--Use Project EIR ��ry •• e o o e • • -•e a o• o O • • • • • • • • • • • • • Compliance Implementation Responsible Verfication Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Monitor Signature Date WDID number for proof of coverage under the De Minimis Threat General Permit or copy of the individual WDR in the WQMP. Additionally, the WQMP aall incorporate any additional BMPs as required by the City Public Works Dement. The WQMP shall include the following additional requirements: Project and Site Characterization Requirements ■ Entitlement Application numbers and,site address shall be included on the title sheet of the WQMP y ■ In the project description section,explain whether--proposed use includes on-site food preparation,eating areas(if not please state), outdoor activities to be expected,vehicle maintenance,serrvice, washing cleaning(if prohibited on site,please state) ■ All potential pollutants of concern for the proposed project land usea type as per Table 7.11-1 of the Orange County Model Water Quality Management Plan shall be identified ■ A narrative describing how all potential pollutants of concern will be -.� addressed through the implementation of BMPs and describing how < site design BMP concepts will be considered and incorporated into the project design shall be included ■ Existing soil types and estimated percentages of perviousness for existing and proposed conditions shall be identified ■ In Section I of the WQMP,state verbatim the Developmenty Requirements from the Planning Departments letter to the Applicant ' CD o ■ A site plan showing the location of the selected treatment control BMPs and drainage areas shall be included in the WQMP _ ■ A Geotechnical Report shall be submitted to address site conditions for >,,_ o determination of infiltration limitations and other pertinent o characteristics. N.._ N Project-Based Treatment Control BMPs ■ Infiltration-type BMPs shall not be used unless the Geotechnical Report states otherwise.Depth to seasonal high groundwater is 13 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR e e e e • o e o - •e o o• e Mitigat!Oh Whitioring, • • Reporting Program Compliance Implementation Responsible Verdication Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Monitor Signature Date determined-.provide at least a 10-foot clearance between the bottom of the BMP and-top of the water table. ■ Wet swales and grassed,channels shall not be used because of the slow infiltration rates of project site soils,the potentially shallow depth to groundwater,and water conservation needs ■ If proprietary Structural Treatment Cont oror (,devices are used,they shall be sited and designed in compliance with the manufacturers design criteria '. ■ Surface exposed treatment control BMPs shall be selected such that standing water drains or evaporates within 24 hours or as required by the County's vector control ■ Excess stormwater runoff shall bypass the treatment control BMPs unless they are designed to handle the flow rate or volume from a 100- year storm event without reducing effectiveness.Effectiveness of any treatment control BMP for removing the pollutants of concern shall be , documented via analytical models or existing studies on effectiveness. ' ■ The project WQMP shall incorporate water efficient landscaping using �y drought tolerant,native plants in accordance with Landscape and �` to Irrigation Plans as set forth by the Applicant(see below) 9- ■ Pet waste stations(stations that provide waste pick-up bags and a convenient disposal container protected from precipitation)shall be y provided and maintained • ■ Building materials shall minimize exposure of bare metals to stormwater.Copper or Zinc roofing materials,including downspouts, 0 shall be prohibited.Bare metal surfaces shall be painted with non-lead- �. containing paint 0 The following BMPs shall not be used because they have not been shown o to be effective in many situations. Therefore, unless sufficient objective , o studies and review are available and supplied with the WQMP to correctly N size devices and to document expected pollutant removal rates the WQMP b shall not include: ■ Hydrodynamic separator type devices as a BMP for removing any 14 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR • o s • e m • • - m'Ort • o • • compliance Implementation Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation MoniForing Activity liming _ Monitor Signature Date pollutant except trash and gross particulates ,, ■ Oil and Grif'separators Any Applicant proposing. development in the Specific Plan Area is encouraged to consider the following BMPs: v Sand filters or other filters(including media filters)for rooftop runoff ■ Dry swales.A dry swale treatment system could be used if sufficient area,slope gradient,and length of swale could be incorporated into the project design.Dry swales could remove substantial amounts of nutrients,suspended solids,metals,and petroleum hydrocarbons ■ Other proprietary treatment devices(if supporting documentationjs provided) Nonstructural BMPs ..4� The WQMP shall include the following operations and maintenance BMPs under the management of an applicant or property manager, where applicable. The Applicant"shall fund and implement an operational and maintenance program that includes the following: ® The Applicant shall dictate minimum landscape maintenance standards and tree trimming requirements for the total project site. Cr Landscape maintenance shall be performed by a qualified landscape maintenance company or individual in accordance with a Chemical y t� Management Plan detailing chemical application methods,chemical handling procedures,and worker training.Pesticide application shall be performed by a certified applicator.No chemicals shall be stored on-site unless in a covered and contained area and in accordance with an approved Materials Management Plan.Application rates shall not o exceed labeled rates for pesticides,and shall not exceed soil test rates for nutrients.Slow release fertilizers shall be used to prevent excessive Z 0 nutrients in stormwater or irrigation runoff. o ■ The Applicant or property manager shall have the power and duty to N establish,oversee,guide,and require proper maintenance and tree trimming procedures per the ANSI A-300 Standards as established by the International Society of Arborist.The Applicant or property manager shall require that all trees be trimmed by or under the direct City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 15 o a a e s o a o s e o e e o mitidaffoh Mohito n hGf.and Rep orting Vrogra Compliance Implementation Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure. Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Monitor Signature Dale observation/direction of a licensed/certified Arborist for the entire area. The Applicant shall establish minimum standards for maintenance for thlst tta community,and establish enforcement thereof for the total community.The property manager shall rectify problems arising from incorrect tree`trimming,chemical applications,and other maintenance within the total community. ■ Landscape irrigation shall-be performed in accordance with an Irrigation Management Plan to"minimize excess irrigation contributing to dry-and wet-weather runoff.Automated sprinklers shall be used and be inspected at least quarterly and adjusted,yearty to minimize potential excess irrigation flows.Landscape irrigation maintenance shall be performed in accordance with the approved,irrigation plans, the City Water Ordinance and per the City Arboricultural and Landscape Standards and Specifications. ' ■ Proprietary stormwater treatment systems maintenance shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.If a nonproprietary treatment system is used,maintenance shall be in accordance with standard practices as identified in the current CASQA (2003)handbooks,operations and maintenance procedures outlined in the approved WQMP,City BMP guidelines,or other City-accepted guidance. ■ Signage,enforcement of pet waste controls,and public education would improve use and compliance,and therefore,effectiveness of the program,and reduce the potential for hazardous materials and other pollution in stormwater runoff.The Applicant shall prepare and install appropriate signage,disseminate information to residents and retail o businesses,and include pet waste controls(e.g.,requirements for pet waste cleanup,pet activity area restrictions,pet waste disposal 0 restrictions)in the any agreement,tenant lease(regarding rental Z property)or Conditions,Covenants,and Restrictions(regarding for- ° sale property). ;, C> ■ Street sweeping shall be performed at an adequate frequency to C' prevent build up of pollutants(see hftp://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ultraurb/uubmp3p7.htm/for street sweeping effectiveness). 16 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR •e e o • o o a - •e a •• o s o�Miti • • • • • • - • o a • • o Compliance Implementation Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity 71ming Monitor Signature Date ■ The Applicant shall develop a maintenance plan for BMPs and facilities identifying responsible parties and maintenance schedules and appropriate BMPs to minimize discharges of contaminants to storm drain systems'during maintenance operations. ■ Reporting requirements:the Applicant or property manager shall prepare an annual report and submit the annual report to the City of Huntington Beach documenting the-BMPs operations and maintenance conducted that year.The'annual report shall also address the potential system deficiencies and corrective actions taken or planned. Site Design BMPs Any Applicant proposing development in the Specific Plan Area is required to incorporate LID principles as defined in the Municipal NPDES Permit` and is encouraged to consider the following BMPs, if allowed in accordance with the Geotechnical Report and limitations on infiltration BMPs: ■ Use of porous concrete or asphalt(if acceptable to the Geotechnical Engineer and where infiltration will not adversely affect groundwater) or other pervious pavement for driveways,paths,sidewalks,and courtyards/open space areas,to the maximum extent practicable, a' would reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff as well as provide some detention within the material void space.If porous paver blocks are Y used,they shall be adequately maintained to provide continued porosity(effectiveness) ■ Incorporation of rain gardens or cisterns to reuse runoff for landscape ' , 0 irrigation '* 0 ■ Green roofs to reduce runoff and treat roof pollutants Z _ z ■ Site design and landscape planning to group water use requirements N for efficient irrigation N BECSP MM4.7-2 The City of Huntington Beach shall require that any Groundwater Review and Prior to issuance Public Works o Applicant prepare a Groundwater Hydrology Study to determine the lateral approve of a precise I Void space is the empty space between individual particles. City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 17 •e e e e • e • - s e • •o • MifigationMonitoring and - • • O • O •mi Compliance lmplementafion Responsible Verification MitigafionMeasure Documentation Monitoring Activity riming Monitor Signature Date transmissivity Brea soils and a safe pumping yield such that dewatering Hydrology Study Groundwater grading permit activities do not inlerf�re with nearby water supplies. The Groundwater Hydrology Study Hydrology Study shall make recommendations on whether permanent groundwater dewatering is~feasible within the constraints of a safe pumping level. The Applicant's engineer of record shall incorporate the Hydrology Study designs and recommenkations into project plans. If groundwater dewatering is determined allowabTe,byy the City,the Applicant shall submit an application to the RWQCB for dewatering purposes, per the De Minimis Permit Number R8-2009-0003. If s& groundwater dewatering is determined to not be feasible, permanent groundwater dewatering shall not be implemented. The City Director of Public works, OCWD, and other regulatory agencies shall approve or disapprove any . permanent groundwater dewatering based on the Groundwater Hydrology Study and qualified Engineers'recommendations. BECSP MM4.7-3 The City of Huntington Beach shall require that the Hydrology anZl� Review and Prior to issuance Public Works Applicant's Licensed Civil Engineer for each site-specific development Hydraulics Study -,,, approve study of a precise prepare a Hydrology and Hydraulic Study to identify the effects of potential grading permit stormwater runoff from the specific development on the existing storm drain flows for the 10-, 25-, and 100-year design storm events. The Precise final grading Inspect project site; Following grading, Public Works drainage improvements shall be designed and constructed as required by the Department of Public Works to mitigate impact of increased runoff due and street verify that drain-age,, excavation,and to development,or deficient,downstream systems.Design of all necessary improvement plans is in accordanceinstallation of drainage improvements shall provide mitigation for all rainfall event and studies with approved plans utilities frequencies up to a 100-year frequency The Applicant shall design site and that required y drainage and document that the proposed development would not increase drat nsystem peak storm event flows over pre-1986 Qs, which must be established by drain system by the hydrology study. If the analyses shows that the City's current drainage improvements have Q system cannot meet the volume needs of the project runoff,the applicant been implemented. shall be required to attenuate site runoff to an amount not to exceed the 25-year storm as determined using pre-1986 criteria. As an option, the Z applicant may choose to explore low-flow design alternatives,downstream � attenuation or detention, or upgrade the City's stormwater system to o accommodate the impacts of the new development, at no cost to the City. t i The Hydrology and Hydraulic Study shall also incorporate all current o adopted Municipal NPDES Permit and City requirements for stormwater flow calculations and retention/detention features in effect at the time of review. 18 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR • o e e • • • e - • • e • e • Compliance Implementation Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation MoniforingActivity: riming Monitor Signature Date BECSP MM4.7-4 The City of Huntington Beach shall require that adequate Hydrology and Review and Prior to issuance Public Works capacity in thb,�storm drain system is demonstrated from the specific Hydraulics Study approve study of a precise development site discharge location to the nearest main channel to grading permit accommodate discharges,,from the specific development. If capacity is demonstrated as adequate,no upgrades will be required. If capacity is not adequate, the City of Huntington Beach shall identify corrective action(s) required by the specific development`Applicant to ensure adequate capacity.Corrective action could include,but is'not�limited to: ■ Construction of new storm drains,as identified in theWPD or based on the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study,if the Hydrology and--Hydraulic Study identifies greater impacts than the MPD `may ■ Improvement of existing storm drains,as identified in the MPD or `�. based on the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study,if the Hydrology and Hydraulic Study identifies greater impacts than the MPD ■ In-lieu fees to implement systemwide storm drain infrastructure improvements ■ Other mechanisms as determined by the City Department of Public Works ■ For nonresidential areas,if redevelopment would result in an impervious fraction of less than 0.9 and does not increase the directly connected impervious area compared to existing conditions,runoff is y expected to remain the same or less than as assessed in the MPD and only MPD improvements would be required C Because some storm drain system constraints may be located far o downgradient from the actual development site, several properties may , , serve to contribute to system capacity constraints. Therefore, the City ' Department of Public Works shall assess each site development and Z system characteristics to identify the best method for achieving adequate o capacity in the storm drain system. Drainage assessment fees/districts to N improve/implement storm drains at downstream locations or where N contributing areas are large are enforced through Municipal Code o (Section 14.20). The City Department of Public Works shall review the Hydrology and �M Hydraulic Study and determine required corrective actions or if a waiver 19 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR `Y e• e • • • e s —e• • e a o • •n!Monitod6g.,and Weporting Programi Comptidnce Implementation Responsible Verfication Mfigation Measure Documentation Moniforfig Activity Timing Monitor Signature Date of corrective action'N�applicable. The site-specific development Applicant shall incorporate required`corrrective actions into their project design and/or plan. Prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy or final inspection, the City Department of Public Workslshall ensure that required corrective action has been implemented. ..... _.,, ,.R. r -•r ..;. Z, ,, .v,;�;;yt .�:s ..r '. fP .y'C�.Yi ",@i �i+ d'�S"s`'� ;'S;a':. �. - �,, ,, ,. •,,,34f '. .�d'' , +'3'.f,��iv;. ^,. g ,'.. .�?t;•.�� n.Kt' -` �S' .ft"AF``. �'" .t" r .;��+ n a i # :x-; � "f a,;'•, i'3rtt�.*Gy ,� a va 4 8,LAND USE, D.PLANNING .U= ik� - .�i�;,_�n,,ffi�a....,�'"`��. &Y?.- eiakn dk,.�.�o a' .S�.A•.:ca¢�}fi.:arXkl -?Eta�at:�3+"vL..+.t��.:L�. None sue@ til 4.� y3. 4� N, C INI o N ems,, O a N } O �O 3.,Yk 20 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use ProjectEIR' o e • a a • o o -•o a •o e • • on • a and RiE 116ffin!gfr6gfdni Compliance ImplementaBon Responsible Verffcation MFlgationMeasure Documentatlon MonitoringAc6i 17ming MonfYor Signature Date plw -�a� r^.y q." €i„.F T;" Am'�: ", c, j ..�, , �; �s, ✓, ns •�%f "'AT7 ly-a"'4"". v A�*Fx- 1 7P",;?. .e F.. "+.�, i} s ,, r'b a xf ;;dF' au`••;". r t3!Psa, "`gr't�. „5�` nx`� , +Yl �'� xL S`4 +` `� "'F� e d.{.- "�k' ^s il;TTrr.e': 4i .��' i�i.^ - `at` " `�; "iit34✓ '�s..E ^x�;�t'� ' a .�•�-fs.i+ 4� m O z N O 'N N City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 21 e • • 0 O • • • - • O O • • 0 Compliance Implementaflon Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Monitor Signature Date BECSP,_MM4.9-1 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning that the'"following construction best management practices (BMPs) be notes on grading and approve contract issuance of a implemente"y,contractors to reduce construction noise levels: building plans specifications, grading permit grading and building ■ Two weeks prior tb#he commencement of construction,notification plans for inclusion must be provided to surrounding land uses within 300 feet of a project site disclosing the construcfion,schedule,including the various types of activities that would be occurring'throughout the duration of the Periodic field check During Planning construction period construction ® Ensure that construction equipment is properly'muffled according to industry standards and be in good working condition ® Place noise-generating construction equipment and locate construction staging areas away from sensitive uses,where feasible e Schedule high-noise-producing activities between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM to minimize disruption on sensitive uses,Monday through = Saturday;schedule pile-driving activities between the hours of 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM on Mondays through Fridays only ■ Implement noise attenuation measures,which may include,but are not limited to,temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationary construction noise sources ® Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel `L` equipment,where feasible e ® Construction-related equipment,including heavy-duty equipment, ' motor vehicles,and portable equipment,shall be turned off when not inEn use for more than 10 minutes w' O ■ Construction hours,allowable workdays,and the phone number of the o job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances '` Z to allow for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job ' o superintendent;if the City or the job superintendent receives a - No complaint,the superintendent shall investigate,take appropriate corrective action,and report the action taken to the reporting party o Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. 22 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR e• e e e o • a - •• • o e • -miti• e • • • • • • - e • e • e • Compliance Implementaffon Responsible Venncation Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity riming Monitor Signature Date BECSP MM4.9.2 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Prior to issuance Planning that con strucfionwstaging areas along with the operation of earthmoving notes on grading plans approve grading of a grading permit equipment within the,project area would be located as far away from and building plans plans and building vibration and noise sensitive sites as possible.Contract specifications shall plans for inclusion be included in the proposed project construction documents,which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance-,c a grading permit. BECSP MM4.9-3 Project applicants shall require by contract specifications Contract language and Review and Prior to issuance Building and that heavily loaded trucks used during construction would be routed away notes on grading and approve grading of a grading permit Safety from residential streets. Contract specifications shall-be included in the building plans and building plans proposed project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the for inclusion City prior to issuance of a grading permit. �a BECSP MM4.9-4 Project applicants shall provide proper shielding for ally, Contract language and Review and Prior to issuance Planning new HVAC systems used by the proposed residential and mixed-use '''notes on building approve building of a building buildings to achieve a noise attenuation of 15 dBA at 50 feet from the plans-,,,',,,-- lans-,� plans for inclusion permit equipment. '" BECSP MM4.9-5 Prior to issuance of building permits, project applicants Acoustical Study n Review and Prior to issuance Planning shall submit an acoustical study for each development, prepared by a approval of study of building permits certified acoustical engineer. Should the results of the acoustical study and building plans indicate that that exterior (e.g., patios and balconies) and interior noise for ni clus on any levels would exceed the standards set forth in the City of Huntington Beach special design Municipal Code Sections 8.40.050 through 8.40.070,the project applicant measures N shall include design measures that may include acoustical paneling or walls to ensure that noise levels do not exceed City standards. Final project design shall incorporate special design measures in the � . construction of the residential units,if necessary. CD CD 4 OPUN R OW5�NG ..WO None — — — — — � ;n �" �- n_�✓..r J_r�d ' �*may- �r ;� � K. BECSP MM4.11 1 Subject to the City's annual budgetary process, which Budget sufficiently to A9 Review at annual Prior to issuance Planning u N considers available funding and the staffing levels needed to provide maintain standard budgetary of building permits ` o acceptable response time for fire and police services,the City shall provide level of fire and police discussions;Review NIN sufficient funding to maintain the City's standard, average level of service protection currently standard through the use of General Fund monies. levels _. City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 23 •• • e • o e MIT;- •e • s o e Me 1figation Monitoring • s - • • • o • e Compliance,:. Implementation Responsible Verfffcatfon Mitigation Measure Documentation MonfforingActivity, riming Monffor Signature, Date .s{i t"F a` k aY"' ':�. �,ic'l'" N, � .�'�'�q t., '"�r"< '"7 •.'�`�'�q( , 'f �.�7�e �9 {�� c �.v.�`��"i' t.r��, �� 8, rf `"`.'"��.% "'n� 011 a - 'Sr... i-..,ir�� — . )m. +x . ., ,� 4f±13 TRANSPORT ONITRAFFIC C _ , M:h�^SA.. e.#a'k:ra�.:u. sGaf:..v.� ,�. ;.�,a��!�n��.��.�,i°�,�.e.,..-35� ��' '.��iS�;,YA,. e.seCc':.d.. .,.u:iy„P•� �� � �, .:.n�s!. ���m"X�a.c 3�;�? BECSP MM4.13-1 For future' ects that occur within the Specific an Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make_a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a separate westbound right]tbrn,,lane to the intersection of occupancy Beach Boulevard at Warner Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans approval. BECSP MM4.13-2 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution"forltthe payment of certificate of addition of dual northbound and southbound left turn lanes to the occupancy intersection of Beach Boulevard at Garfield Avenue.Implementation of this . improvement would require Caltrans approval. " BECSP MM4.13-3 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share: Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment v t of certificate of addition of a fourth northbound through lane to the intersection of -, occupancy Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. BECSP MM4.13-4 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment `N.,` of certificate of addition of a separate northbound right turn lane to the intersection of °,occupancy Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. M - BECSP MM4.13-5 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works P area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate off, o addition of a fourth southbound through lane to the intersection of occupancy Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. '', 0' BECSP MM4.13-6 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works Z area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of N addition of a fourth eastbound through lane to the intersection of occupancy o Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. 24 City of Huntington Beach,Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 0 0 O 0 O O O • -0 0 O O O O Mit1gatiOh*Ohit6rihg:arfd, p0rtingfrogrdm Compliance Implementation Responsible Verification Mitigation.Measure Documentaffon Monitoring Activity Timing Monrto► Signature Date BECSP MM4.13-7 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition vof a .fourth westbound through lane to the intersection of occupancy Brookhurst'Street at Adams Avenue. BECSP MM4.13-8 Forafuture projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area,the project applicant(s)-shall make a fair share contribution to allow a payment of certificate of right turn overlap for a westbound right turn at the intersection of occupancy Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue ° BECSP MM4.13-9 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area,the project applicant(s)shall make a fair sha're,contribution to allow a payment of certificate of right turn overlap for a northbound right turn at the,intersection of occupancy Brookhurst Street at Adams Avenue. BECSP MM4.13-10 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the'-payment of certificate of addition of a fourth northbound through lane to the intersection of Beach �`=c occupancy Boulevard at Edinger Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would4 y require Caltrans approval. BECSP MM4.13-11 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share ` Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a third westbound through lane to the intersection of Beach occupancy Boulevard at Edinger Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans approval. BECSP MM4.13-12 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment *-Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate ofEn addition of a separate southbound right-turn lane to the intersection of occupancy o Beach Boulevard at Bolsa Avenue. Implementation of this improvement ` • would require Caltrans approval. �J BECSP MM4.13-13 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance "Public Works o area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of ^' 0 addition of a second westbound left-turn lane to the intersection of Beach occupancy r, Boulevard at Talbert Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would o require Caltrans approval. J�4, 25 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR •e • • e • • e -e e •• e Mitigation e • • O • Reporting • • • compliance Implementation Responsible VerRtcallon Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity riming Monitor Signature Date BECSP MM4.13-14 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition de facto westbound right-turn lane to the intersection of Beach occupancy Boulevard at bent Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans ap val. BECSP MM4.13-15 For fu cre,projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of conversion of a separate westbound right-turn lane to a de facto right-turn occupancy lane at the intersection of Newland Street at Darner Avenue. BECSP MM4.13-16 For future projects that occ r within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a third westbound through lane to the intersection of Newland occupancy Street at Warner Avenue. BECSP MM4.13-17 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan, Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the ,payment of certificate of addition of a separate southbound right-turn lane to the intersection of occupancy Beach Boulevard at McFadden Avenue. Implementation of this improvement would require Caltrans and City of Westminster approvals. BECSP MM4.13-18 For future projects that occur within the Specific Plan Proof of fair share Confirm payment Prior to issuance Public Works area, the project applicant(s) shall make a fair share contribution for the payment of certificate of addition of a separate northbound right-turn lane to the intersection of °�,, occupancy ' Beach Boulevard at McFadden Avenue. Implementation of this Y improvement would require Caltrans and City of Westminster approvals. y o o N >, lh 26 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR Will e a • o 0 0 0 • - • a • a e • .Compliance Implementation Responsible Ven Ication Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity riming Monitor Signature Date ,,. .-.. .. ,. Tr„ryw< - , *.; ;..;.._ .","`,, :-;* > .. ; a x• r :€aR: p,q,.,. gS rn gw. -r,.. .�.. r� ksx-;:.�.x "L r'lull .� `S r "- ,;;e' �§::. �£,:�;v"..., s: tixfr��q�yra � d� .3a %ECSPM4.14-1 The components of future projects in the Specific Plan Notes on construction Review construction Prior to issuance Public Works incorporate the following measures to ensure that conservation plans and conditions, plans prior to of building permits; tt water use,practices are implemented per project. Project covenants and issuance of building Prior to final proponents,a's applicable,shall: restrictions(CC&Rs), permits;Review inspection ® Require employees tojeport leaks and water losses immediately and as applicable CC&Rs prior to final shall provide information andtraining as required to allow for efficient inspection reporting and follow up ® Educate employees about the imp aiice_and benefits of water conservation ® Create water conservation suggestion boxes,and lace them in prominent areas .. ■ Install signs in restrooms and cafeterias that encourage water conservation ` ■ Assign an employee to evaluate water conservation opportunities and � Y,z effectiveness ■ Develop and implement a water management plan for its facilities that .k;• includes methods for reducing overall water use ro Conduct a water use survey to update current water use needs (processes and equipment are constantly upgrading,thus changing ^ ,, the need for water in some areas) CD M ' ■ Repair leaks;check the water supply system for leaks and turn off Fq unnecessary flows ® Utilize water-efficient irrigation systems and drought tolerant plant palette and insure that sprinklers are directing water to landscape . z areas,and not to parking lots,sidewalks or other paved areas o ® Adjust the irrigation schedule for seasonal changes ■ Install low-flow or waterless fixtures in public and employee restrooms ■ Instruct cleaning crews to use water efficiently for mopping -0 , `�. City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR `'- 27 e o e e o 0 o a e o a o a o mffi• O • O O • O • • O • 9 • O Comp116nce' implementation Responsible Verffcation Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Monitor, Signature Date m ; Use brooms,squeegees,and wet/dry vacuums to clean surfaces before washing with water;do not use hoses as brooms;sweep or blow paved areas to clean,rather than hosing off(applies outside,not inside) {,_ m Avoid washing,building exteriors or other outside structures 1 ., m Sweep and vacuum parking lots/sidewalks/window surfaces rather than washing with water ■ Switch from"wet'carpet cleaning methods,such as steam,to"dry," powder methods;change window-cleaning„schedule from"periodic"to as required" ■ Set automatic optic sensors on icemakers to minimum.fill levels to provide lowest possible daily requirement;ensure units are air-cooled and not water-cooled ■ Control the flow of water to the garbage disposal - ■ Install and maintain spray rinsers for pot washing and reduce flow of .. spray rinsers for prewash m Turn off dishwashers when not in use—wash only full loads .:. m Scrape rather than rinse dishes before washing r' m Operate steam tables to minimize excess water use Y m Discontinue use of water softening systems where possible ' m CD water pressure and flows to dishwashers are set a minimum 4 - CD required setting m Install electric eye sensors for conveyer dishwashers , m Install flushometer(tankless)toilets with water-saving diaphragms and z 0 coordinate automatic systems with work hours so that they don't run w o continuously 'N N m Use a shut-off nozzle on all hoses that can be adjusted down to a finev spray so that water flows only when needed m Install automatic rain shutoff device on sprinkler systems ~ 28 City of Huntington Beach, Beach a'nd Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 0 0 O O O O O a - 0 0 O "Y'pmr Compliance implementation Responsible° Venricahon Mitigation Measure Documentation. MonitonngActinty 71ming Monitor Signature Date , V , -:.f.. Y.q ;.,�p ` �s 4 .5�CL ATEbCH.APIGE r ,: h " .x. - ,� Y�� : , gin ,.. � � � _.aw.. _.,... , BECSP Mk.15-1 The City shall require by contract specifications that all Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning diesel-powere uipment used would be retrofitted with after-treatment notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a products (e.g., eng catalysts and other technologies available at the and construction plans specifications and grading permit time construction comm races)to the extent that they are readily available grading plans and and cost effective when c& ttrruction activities commence. Contract construction plans specifications shall be included ihshe proposed project construction for inclusion documents,which shall be approved by t� ity of Huntington Beach. BECSP MM4.15-2 The City shall require by co tract specifications that Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning alternative fuel construction equipment(i.e.,compresse'd,0atural gas,liquid notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) would be utilize`a-tk the extent and construction plans specifications and grading permit feasible at the time construction activities commence. Contract grading plans and specifications shall be included in the proposed project construction construction plans documents,which shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. for inclusion BECSP MM4.15-3 The City shall require that developers within the project Conttact language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning site use locally available building materials,such as concrete, stucco,and notes ono struction approve contract issuance of a interior finishes, for construction of the project and associated plans specifications and building permit infrastructure, construction plans for inclusion BECSP MM4.15-4 The City shall require developers within the project site Contract language and Revie�,and Plan check prior to Planning to establish a construction management plan with Rainbow Disposal to notes on grading plans approve"hontract issuance of a divert a target of 50 percent of construction, demolition, and site clearing and construction plans specificatiosand grading or building Y waste. grading plans an`d-�, permit,which construction plans occurs earlier for inclusion . o BECSP MM4.15-5 The City shall require by contract specifications that Contract language and Review and Plan ch` ck prior to Planning construction equipment engines will be maintained in good condition and in notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of"a-, 0 proper tune per manufacturer's specification for the duration of and construction plans specifications and grading permit ' Z 0 construction. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed grading plans and project construction documents, which shall be approved by the City of construction plans Huntington Beach. for inclusion 0 4_ w City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 29 0 0 O 0 0 • • O 0 • 0Prowdinil Compliance Implementation Responsible Verification Mitigation Measure Documentation Monitoring Activity Timing Monitor Signature Date BECSP MM4.15-6 The City shall require by contract specifications that Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning truction-related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor notes on grading plans approve contract issuance of a vehicle , nd portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for and construction plans specifications and grading permit more than"five minutes. Diesel fueled commercial motor vehicles with grading plans and gross vehicular``weight ratings of greater than 10,000 pounds shall be construction plans turned off when not`in use for more than five minutes. Contract for inclusion specifications shall be i eluded in the proposed project construction documents,which shall be appr6v by the City of Huntington Beach. BECSP MM4.15-7 The City shall require that any new development within Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning the Specific Plan area provide signs within°1Nading dock areas clearly notes on construction approve contract issuance of a visible to truck drivers. These signs shall state that�trucks cannot idle in plans specifications and building permit excess of five minutes per trip. construction plans °>. for inclusion BECSP MM4.15-8 The City shall require by contract specificafi n Ahat Contract language and Review and Plan check prior to Planning electrical outlets are included in the building design of future loading docks,-_,notes on construction approve contract issuance of a to allow use by refrigerated delivery trucks. Future project-specific glans specifications and building permit Applicants shall require that all delivery trucks do not idle for more than five "N� construction plans minutes. If loading and/or unloading of perishable goods would occur for for inclusion more than five minutes, and continual refrigeration is required, all . refrigerated delivery trucks shall use the electrical outlets to continue powering the truck refrigeration units when the delivery truck engine is turned off. >. BECSP MM4.15-9 The City shall require that any new development within Contract language and Revi6honstruction Plan check prior to Planning a the project site provide a bulletin board or kiosk in the lobby of each notes on construction plans for inclusion issuance of proposed structure that identifies the locations and schedules of nearby plans certificate of transit opportunities. . occupancy o 0 0 c5.. y� �M1 30 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR Esparza, Patty From: Flynn, Joan Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 10:56 AM To: Esparza, Patty; Lugar, Robin Subject: Fw: Fwd: OVSD's Letter of Objections to Proposed Certification of FEIR 10-004 Attachments: Ltr to HB City Council 2-3-12.pdf; ATT209803.htm SUPPLEMENTAL Joan L. Flynn, CIVIC COMMUNICATION Huntington Beach City Clerk r Meeting Date; From: Wilson, Fred Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 10:54 AM Agenda Item No. To: Hess, Scott Cc: Hall, Bob; Flynn, Joan Subject: Fwd: OVSD's Letter of Objections to Proposed Certification of FEIR 10-004 Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Ed Connor<econnor@businesslit.com> Date: February 3, 2012 5:08:07 PM PST To: "dhansen@surfcity-hb.org" <dhansen@surfcity-hb.org>, "Devi n.Dwyer@surfcity-hb.org" <Devin.Dwyer@surfcity-hb.org>, "connie.boardman@surfcity-hb.org".<connie.boardman@surfcity- hb.org>, "kbohr@surfcity-hb.org" <kbohr@surfcity-hb.org>, "icarchio@surfcity-hb.org" <icarchio@surfcity-hb.org>, "matthew.harper@surfcity-hb.org" <matthew.harper@surfcity-hb.org>, "ioe.shaw@surfcity-hb.org" <ioe.shaw@surfcity-hb.org> Cc: "fred.wilson@surfcity-hb.org" <fred.wilson@surfcity-hb.org> Subject:OVSD's Letter of Objections to Proposed Certification of FOR 10-004 1 am counsel for the Ocean View School District. Please find attached the electronic version of OVSD's letter of objections to the proposed certification of FEIR 10-004, which is scheduled for consideration at the City Council meeting scheduled for February 6, 2012. Duplicate originals of this letter are being sent to each of you via overnight courier for delivery on Monday. Edmond M. Connor Connor, Fletcher & Williams LLP 2211 Michelson Dr., Ste. 1100 Irvine, CA 92612 949-622-2600 Fax: 949-622-2626 E-Mail: econnor businesslit.com 1 The information in this e-mail is intended for the named recipients only. It may contain privileged and confidential matter. If you have received this mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail or by collect call. Please do not disclose the contents to anyone. 2 EDMOND M.CONNOR MATTHEW J. FLETCHER C F MICHAEL R.WILLIAMS DOUGLASA. HEDENKAMP CONNOR, FLE+�CHER & WILLIAMS LLP SHIRY TANNENBAUM i1lf II AT,TORNEYs AT LAW MICHAEL SAPIRA February 3, 2012 i li I VIA E-MAIL AND OVERNIGHT COURIERi w Members of City Council j City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Re: Appeal of Planning Commission's Denial of Certification of FEIR 10-004 For Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project Dear Council Members: We represent the Ocean View School District (the "School District"), and we respectfully request that the City of Huntington Beach (the "City") cease and desist from its recent, and j entirely unlawful, practice of separating the EIR certification process from the project approval process. Specifically, the School District requests that, at Council's upcoming meeting on I February 6, 2012, the City Council deny Mayor Don Hansen's appeal of the Planning Commission's failure to certify Final Environmental Impact Report No. 10-004 ("FEIR 10-004") for the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project (the "Project"). j I Except for one other occasion when the City Council certified FEIR No. 10-003 for the Beach/Warner Mixed Use Project less than two months ago on December 19, 2011, the certification of FEIR 10-004, without the simultaneous approval of the Project, would be unprecedented in the annals of the City. More importantly,just like the City's certification of FEIR 10-003 which is now the subject of a lawsuit, the proposed certification of FEIR 10-004 would clearly be illegal. Section 21003(a) of the California Environmental Quality Action ("CEQA") and CEQA Guidelines section 15004(c) explicitly require EIR certifications and project approvals to "run concurrently, not consecutively." Indeed, as expressly noted by the California Supreme Court in Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v Regents of University of California (1993) 6 Cal. 4th 1112, 1132, "[i]n 1976, the Legislature enacted legislation to require CEQA review to be integrated with, and run concurrently with, other planning processes (§21003) . . . . .. (Emphasis added.) At the Planning Commission hearing that was held on December 13, 2011, three Planning Commissioners openly questioned the propriety of being asked to certify FEIR 10-004 without being allowed to review and comment on, and propose modifications to, and mitigation measures for, the actual Project. For example, Commissioner Farley stated that the Project and 2211 MICHELSON DRIVE,SUITE 1100 IRVINE,CALIFORNIA 92612 T:949.622.2600 F:949.622.2626 E-MAIL:econnor@businesslit.com �-,FI Members of City Council February 3, 2012 Page 2 FEIR 10-004 needed to move together through the planning process and he lamented the fact that the Planning Commission could not craft reasonable measures to mitigate the impacts of the Project because no one knew what the Project was actually going to look like. In addition, Commissioner Farley noted that, if, the actual Project had been presented to the Planning Commission for its consideration, then FEIR 10-004 could have (and should have) analyzed (a) the speed of the streets, not just the capacity of the intersections, (b) the site distances lines to account for the fact that Main Street curves at the Beach/Ellis intersection, and (c) the internal access points and internal circulation of the Project. Finally, Commissioner Farley expressed his concern that, if the Planning Commission were to certify FEIR 10-004, then, if and when the actual Project were processed for approval at some unknown date in the future, the claim would be made that"you all ready certified the EIR, so you cannot deny the Project." Along these same lines, Commissioner Bixby expressed a number of concerns about the adequacy of the environmental analysis set forth in FEIR 10-004 and he said that there were so many unresolved issues relating to the proposed Project that, if FEIR 10-004 were certified, these issues would not be resolved, if at all, until sometime much later in the site plan review process. Echoing these sentiments, Commissioner Peterson voiced his concerns about the traffic impacts that would be generated by the proposed Project and he took issue with the fact that the Planning Commission was being asked to certify FEIR 10-004 without any project approval being processed at the same time. Commenting on this novel procedure, Commissioner Peterson stated "[w]e've done this once, and I hope to stop it." As it turns out, the Planning Commission did, in fact, "stop"the unwarranted attempt by City staff to separate the certification of FEIR 10-004 from the approval of the actual Project. Indeed, the motion made by Commissioner Ryan, and seconded by Commissioner Shier Burnett, to certify FEIR 10-004 failed to gain the necessary four votes to pass. Ironically, in supporting the motion, both Commissioners Ryan and Shier Burnett conceded that the proposed Project, if and when it were ever presented to the Commission, would need a lot of fine tuning in the areas of traffic, remediation of contaminated soils, project density, etc. What is quite surprising, however, is that, in preparing the staff report regarding the issues raised by Mayor Hansen's appeal, City staff chose to completely ignore the above- described comments made by Commissioners Farley, Bixby, and Peterson in questioning why the Planning Commission was being asked to certify FEIR 10-004 without being allowed to review and comment on the Project at the same time. However, merely pretending that those comments were not made does not make them magically disappear from the record. Although staffs silence on this point is deafening, the fact remains that state law prevents the City from certifying FEIR 10-004 without concurrently processing the proposed Project for approval. The School District submits that this procedural defect, which was underscored by the comments of Commissioners Farley, Bixby, and Peterson at the December 13th Planning Commission hearing, cannot be cured unless and until the EIR certification process is started over again and proceeds concurrently with the review and approval process for the proposed Project. CIFIW Members of City Council February 3, 2012 Page 3 Although the School District believes that FEIR 10-004 suffers from a number of major technical deficiencies, these inadequacies have essentially been rendered moot in light of the insurmountable procedural impediment that the City faces in trying to push forward and certify FEIR 10-004 without simultaneously processing the proposed Project for approval. Nevertheless, in an attempt to assist the City in correcting the deficiencies in EIR 10-004 so that it will be free from these errors and omissions when it is recirculated for public review and comment when the actual Project is processed for approval, the School District offers the following comments: No Notice of Preparation. In trying to explain why the City chose to blatantly violate CEQA Guidelines section 15082, which requires a Notice of Preparation ("NOP") to be prepared and sent out whenever a city decides to prepare an EIR, City staff has asserted that no NOP was required for FEIR 10-004 because the proposed Project is the same project that was described in the NOP that was prepared for the EIR for the Beach and Edinger Corridor Specific Plan ("BEC Specific Plan"). The problem is, however, that the Project described in FEIR 10-004 is materially different from the project described in the NOP for the EIR for the BEC Specific Plan (the "BECSP EIR"). The project analyzed in the BESCP EIR included a two-level health club of approximately 71,000 square feet. The proposed Project analyzed in FEIR 10-004 replaces the health club with a 30,000 square foot market, which was described at the Planning Commission hearing on December 13, 2011 as a "high-end market". The City's failure to prepare a NOP for FEIR 10-004 means that the City did not use the correct baseline for analyzing impacts associated with the Project that would be reflective of 2011 environmental conditions. At the DEIR Public Information Meeting held on October 6, 2011, Tipton Wright asked when the traffic counts were taken for the traffic study used for FEIR 10-004. In the FEIR Response to Comments, at page 10-36, it states that the traffic counts included in the BECSP Traffic Study were used as the baseline for FEIR 10-004. Those traffic counts were performed in late 2005 and early 2006, some six years ago. This same outdated data was used for the Air Quality analysis and the Noise Study in FEIR 10-004. The use of this outdated material has irreparably skewed and distorted the environmental analysis set forth in FEIR 10-004. Inadequate Traffic Study. The traffic study in FEIR 10-004 did not truly analyze the "Existing Plus Project" because the existing conditions used were those that occurred in 2006, not August 15, 2011, when the Cumulative Project list was prepared that is set forth in the DEIR, at pages 3-11 through 3-13, Inexplicably, the traffic study for the Project was prepared on July 21, 2011, prior to the Cumulative Project list even being prepared. Furthermore, the traffic study used a "general commercial" trip generation rate for the proposed Project. However, the proposed Project now includes a 30,000 square foot market similar to a "supermarket". A supermarket has a significantly higher trip generation rate than "general commercial". Therefore, the traffic analysis fails to adequately analyze the traffic impacts,of the proposed Project. Inadequate Air Quality Analysis. The data used for the air quality analysis in FEIR 10- 004 was the same as what was used for the BECSP EIR. The study states: CFI Members of City Council February 3, 2012 Page 4 The emissions estimates are based on the estimated trip generation presented in Table 4.13-6 (Existing Year[2008] and Project Trip Generation Comparison) in Section 4.13 (Transportation/Traffic) of this EIR... Therefore, an incorrect baseline of existing conditions was used for FEIR 10-004. In addition, since the traffic analysis was inadequate, the data used for the air qualify analysis was also inadequate. Inadequate Noise Analysis. The data used for the noise analysis in FEIR 10-004 was the same as what was used for the BECSP EIR. The study states: As the noise environment within the project site vicinity has not substantially changed since the analysis prepared for the BECSP EIR, the measurements taken for the BECSP area are appropriate for this analysis. The noise study did not analyze the actual environmental impacts of the proposed Project. Rather, it analyzed the 30,000 square foot market as a "strip mail'. The operational characteristics of a 30,000 square foot market are significantly different than those associated with a strip mall. For example, the noise generated from multiple deliveries, nighttime deliveries, nighttime stocking of the market and noise from high-capacity refrigeration units were not analyzed. In closing, the'School District sincerely hopes that the City Council will follow the lead of the Planning Commission and reject staffs recommendation that FEIR 10-004 be certified. To do otherwise would be to openly violate CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. There is no practical need, nor is there any legal authority, for the City to be certifying a Project EIR without considering an actual project for approval at the same time. To avoid possible litigation regarding this matter, the School District respectfully requests that the City Council follow state law and decline to certify FEIR 10-004. Very truly yours, t� Edmond M. Connor cc: Fred A. Wilson Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 9:27 PM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10399 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Agenda& Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: Barbara Ilizaliturri Description: I am opposed to 6 story apartment complex at Beach and Ellis because it will be totally out of place with the look in Huntington Beach. We already know that the building at Warner and Beach is the only "tall" building in the area and God only knows who approved that oddity. Do not place more tall building on Beach with more and more traffice for Ellis. I live at Newland and Ellis. Please do not approve. Expected Close Date: 02/06/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. SUPPLEMENTAL. COMMUNICATION MomOng Date:—__ — — 4D/� Agenda Item No. /0 1 Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 10:30 PM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10400 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Agenda& Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: Denise Nevin Description: I am a retired teacher and have been a resident of Huntington Beach for over 30 years. The property I own and live in backs to Ellis near Newland. In the more than 30 years I have lived here,tremendous changes have occurred in both traffic and noise. Currently, It is difficult to exit my complex and enter Ellis because of heavy traffic. I leave no windows open due to noise. Several years ago, a second left-turn lane on Beach Blvd. was opened allowing even more traffic to travel eastbound on Ellis. Heavy trucks that should not be using Ellis in fact do use it. My house, which has been sinking, shakes as they pass by, inviting more sinkage. Motorcycles love the hill, and all emergency vehicles use Ellis. Now it seems that a developer wants to impact us even more with a new complex at the corner of Beach and Ellis. I encourage you to support we citizens of Huntington Beach who live in this area, and please do NOT allow this developer to build this massive structure and destroy our area. I invite any of you to my home day or night to experience the unbelievable current traffic and noise that we taxpayers contend with daily. Please take a stand for us and don't let the developer's promises of revenue sway your vote. I am thanking you in advance for your support. I hope I can count on you. This encompasses safety and quality of life. Expected Close Date: 02/06/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION M"*Q Date: - 6 - 80/6 Agenda Item No. i Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 12:55 PM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10405 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Agenda& Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: GWEN EVANS Description: Please do not allow this project to be built and please do not change the zone to mixed. Expected Close Date: 02/07/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Moeft Date: ':;� Z6 Z.�Qz� Agenda Item No..-Z Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 12:45 PM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10404 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to.Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Agenda& Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: Michele Metivier Description: As a homeowner in the area near the proposed Beach and Ellis Mixed User Project, I would like to express my concerns about this project. 1) A six-story building would ruin the open air atmosphere that is currently available at that intersection. One of the things that is so appealing about Huntington Beach is the open air and open skyling that we enjoy. I don't think this should be a luxury extended to those who live on the shoreline. 2) Traffic at that intersection is already congested. Moving the main entrances away from the intersection will just cause backups on Ellis which will back up onto the intersection. Adding 150 more residents to such a small area will definitely increase traffic.- even if there is only 1 car per unit, which is likely the minimum. Please do not approve this project. Think of the people that actually live in this area and will have to deal w ith the consequences of your decision for years to come. Thank you for considering my comments. Expected Close Date: 02/07/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION �,.-Iseting Date: o D Agenda Item No. i Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 2:02 PM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10406 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Question Request area: City Council -Agenda& Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: Florence Pagliassotti Description: I live at La Cuesta, at Ellis and Newland we do not need more housing and traffic we have an accident almost every month on the corner of Ellis and Newland because of the High Volume of traffic and speed... Expected Close Date: 02/07/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION MAeting Date: o'Z .. Agenda Item No. i °� -- CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Planning and Building Department TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members VIA: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager FROM: Scott Hess, AICP, Director.of Planning and Buildi q�k DATE: February 6, 2012 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) NO. 10-004 (BEACH AND ELLIS MIXED USE PROJECT)—MITIGATION MEASURE REVISION Attached is the late communication that was submitted to the Planning Commission dated December 13, 2011, that provides errata to the Draft EIR. Three pages in the Draft EIR pertaining to building height analysis and correction of a typographical error in the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program were revised. RECEIVED FROM AS PUBLIC RECORD W COU"11101"'"'� OF CITY CLERK-OFFICECLERIC JOAN L.FLYNN,CrTy SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Attachment ~` ITEM NO. 10 SH:MBB:rm xc: Bob Hall, Deputy City Manager Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager Rosemary Medel, Associate Planner 0J6 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH -.3r— PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION TO: Chair and Planning Commission VIA: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Build! g` FROM: Rosemary Medel, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-004 (Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project) LATE COMMUNICATION DATE: December 13, 2011 Attached please find late communication pertaining to the Beach and Ellis Mixed Use Project EIR that includes revisions to three pages in the Draft EIR pertaining to building height analysis and correction of a typographical error in the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program, which is Exhibit A of the Resolution. ATTACHMENT Revised Draft EIR pages 4.1-9, 4.8-4 and 6-29 i/ Revised MMRP page 2-22 (page 1.25 of staff report) CADocuments and Settingslbroerenmlocal SettingsUemporary Interr EIR-Late Comm unication.doc LATE COMMUNICATION #3-1 PC MTG 12-13-11 municipal policies and design guidelines pertaining specifically to issues of visual character and aesthetics. To ensure that all new development within the BECSP complies with the Development Code, including applicable Town Center Neighborhood development standards, all development, including the proposed project,is subject to site plan review. Inconsistencies between the design of the proposed project and the BECSP Development Code would be resolved during the site plan review process, and may require revisions to the design of the proposed project or submittal of a request for a variance or minor deviation from the development standards. The project proposes the development of a maximum six-story mixed-use building that would include market and retail uses on the ground floor fronting Ellis Avenue and Beach Boulevard, respectively, and residential uses on the upper levels. Refer to Figure 3-3 (Proposed Project Site Plan) for an illustration of the proposed project's building configuration. Implementation of the proposed project would change the visual character of the site from a low-scale, auto-oriented commercial development to a contemporary, highly-designed, mixed use development consistent with the BECSP vision for the Town Center Neighborhood. Development standards of the BECSP that relate to the visual quality and character of proposed development include regulations for building scale; frontage and building placement; streets; open space; architecture; and signage. Compliance with these development standards would ensure that implementation of the proposed project would not degrade the existing visual character and quality of the project site and surrounding area, and serve to actualize the BECSP vision for the Town Center Boulevard segment. BECSP Section 2.3.1 (Building Height) permits buildings to be a minimum of two stories and a maximum of six stories in height on the project site. Further, BECSP Section 2.3.2 (Special Building Height Limits) establishes special building height limits for development along Beach Boulevard or located adjacent to, or across from, housing such as the project site. In this instance for the proposed project site, along Beach Boulevard building heights are required to be limited to a maximum of four stories for a horizontal distance of 65 feet from the back of the sidewalk and along Ellis Avenue, across from housing on the north side of the street, building heights are required to be limited to a maximum of two stories above the height of the residential uses for a horizontal distance of 65 feet from the back of sidewalk. would l the height ht of Fes. sta � d 1! j d +l. b 'i '' v but b allow fet �� � 1C31Z111J1 �-. Love that ,.,.+>,aek froaa the r gnati Figure 3-4 (Project Elevations) illustrates the proposed building heights and facades. As shown in Figure 3-4, the proposed building would be six stories in height, with the building height stepping up from one story along the Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue sidewalks to six stories at the center/back of the site. Although the height of proposed buildings would be limited immediately adjacent to these roadways, the horizontal distance from the back of the sidewalk for which the building would be a reduced height is less than 65 feet and therefore, does not satisfy the Special Building Height Limits. As such, as designed, the proposed project is not consistent with building height BECSP development standards that directly relate to the visual quality of the site. The proposed ptojeet w wevCl be "' t t.'i L +1 ' City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 4.1-9 o e - -MR WM s Z i M.M 9M. As is the case with the proposed project, there are no scenic vistas available from the proposed project site as most are located along the coast As such, Alternative 3 would have a less than significant impact on scenic vistas, similar to the proposed project.As the project site is located approximately 3 miles from the ocean, no views of the coast currently exist. Building heights would not exceed six stories under Alternative 3, consistent with the proposed project, and therefore would not impact views to a greater extent than what was analyzed for the proposed project. Development occurring under Alternative 3 would be designed in compliance with Town Center Neighborhood development standards included in BECSP Section 2.1.4 (Town Center Neighborhood). Development standards relating to the visual quality and character of Alternative 3 would include regulations for building scale, frontage and building placement, streets, open space, architecture and signage. Under Alternative 3, development along Beach Boulevard would be four stories in height, while the remainder of development on the site would be six stories in height. Building heights under Alternative 3 would be consistent with BECSP Section 2.3.1 (Building Height), which establishes a minimum building height of two stories and maximum building height of six stories on the site, but would be inconsistent with BECSP Section 2.3.2 (Special Building Height Limits), which establishes special building height limits for development along Ellis Avenue er-le e �dde -sere , . As shown in Figure 6-2, the height of the building would not be limited for a distance of 65 feet from the back of sidewalk where development is located across from housing on Ellis Avenue andweuAd ex adi aeefft to Wig. Consequently, Alternative 3 is not consistent with BECSP development standards for building height that directly relate to the visual quality of the site. However, Alternative 3 has been designed with building breaks along Ellis Avenue,which minimizes the building mass and limits the area of nonconformity. Nonetheless, Alternative 3 would result in a greater, less than significant impact relating to the visual quality and character of the project site and surrounding area. All buildings would be built to the sidewalk with uses along Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue fronting these roadways, as required by BECSP Section 2.4 (Frontage and Building Placement Regulations) and building frontages would be designed in compliance with BECSP Section 2.4.2 (Private Frontage Types). Compliance with BECSP Section 2.5 (Street Regulations) would ensure that adjacent streets are improved to enhance the connectivity of the community and create a safe and attractive streetscape environment. Compliance with these development standards would ensure that Alternative 3 would be visually consistent with the BECSP's vision for the Five Points District and would be visually compatible with adjacent residential and commercial uses. Although inconsistencies between the height of buildings and the BECSP Development Code have been identified, during the site plan review process, revisions to the design of Alternative 3 would likely be required in an effort to achieve consistency with the BECSP, as is the case for all development occurring in the BECSP area. As such, site plan review approval would ensure that Alternative 3 would not degrade the existing visual character and quality of the site and surrounding area, similar to the proposed project. Therefore, Alternative 3 would result in a less than significant impact, similar to, but slightly greater than, the proposed project due to the increased massing. City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR 6-29 • O - - proposed project is well within the approved number of dwelling units in the BECSP and would not conflict with the total number of units approved for the area nor the approved uses. Building Height BECSP Section 2.3.1 (Building Height) permits buildings to be a minimum of two stories and a maximum of six stories in height on the project site. Further, BECSP Section 2.3.2 (Special Building Height Limits) establishes special building height limits for development along Beach Boulevard or located adjacent to, or across from, housing such as the project site. In this instance for the proposed project site, along Beach Boulevard building heights are required to be limited to a maximum of four stories for a horizontal distance of 65 feet from the back of the sidewalk and along Ellis Avenue, across from housing on the north side of the street,building heights are required to be limited to a maximum of two stories above the height of the residential uses for a horizontal distance of 65 feet from the back of sidewalk. The-$dent-SP apply the BEGSP --!at fef speeial bt�lding height li— 5 te) 5, easterly betiadaizy, whi eve that seth a ek fiefn the a g a e• Figure 3-4 (Project Elevations) illustrates the proposed building heights and facades. As shown in Figure 3-4, the proposed building would be six stories in height, with the building height stepping up from one story along the Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue sidewalks to six stories at the center/back of the site. Although the height of proposed buildings would be limited immediately adjacent to these roadways, the horizontal distance from the back of the sidewalk for which the building would be a reduced height is less than 65 feet and therefore, does not satisfy the Special Building Height Limits. As such, as designed, the proposed project is not consistent with building height BECSP development standards that directly relate to the visual quality of the site. nowevei!be-eeasi.r i Although inconsistencies between the height of buildings and the BECSP Development Code have been identified, during the site plan review process revisions to the design of the proposed project would likely be required in an effort to achieve consistency with the BECSP, as is the case for all development occurrin in the BECSP area. As such, site plan review approval would ensure that the proposed project would Pc flict with the BECSP. Street and Open Space Design Existing streets would include public frontage improvements, as required by BECSP Section 2.5.1(1)(c). Along Beach Boulevard, the Palm Tree Boulevard typical configuration would be implemented. The proposed project would also be consistent with BECSP Section 2.6 (Open Space Regulations), which requires the provision of public open space at a rate of 50 sf per 1,000 sf of retail uses.and per dwelling unit to be provided on the project site. If public open space cannot be provided on the project site, the payment of an in-lieu fee to construct the required amount of usable open space offsite is permitted by BECSP Section 2.6.1(2). The project proposes a total of 1,850 sf of public open space in the form of a plaza at the corner of Beach Boulevard and Ellis Avenue. The remaining open space requirement would be satisfied through the payment of an in-lieu fee to provide the open space off site. Additionally, 10,500 sf of open space for residential use would be provided on Level six of the proposed building. 4.8-4 City of Huntington Beach, Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR , . Table 2-1 Summary of EnvironmentalEffects and Code Requlrements/Mit�gation Measures ... ... .:•: . ...: Stgnttt :. Slgnflf :. :. ve a .. ve a. • .. ace, canoe ' . cn . Irr►paCt(a) Prior in.Mtttgafion "'' iMitlgaHonMeasure(s and/or CodeRequlrements A1terMHtgaHon Impact 4.11-2 Implementation of the proposed project LTS BECSP MM4.11.1 would also apply. LTS would not result in the need for new or physically altered police facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios and the impact would be less than significant. Impact 4.11.3 Implementation of the proposed project LTS BECSP CR4.11-1 The project Applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees in LTS would not require new or physically altered facilities to effect at the time of building permit issuance to the Ocean View School District to cover accommodate additional students and would be less than additional school services required by the new development.These fees are currently$1.37 significant. per square foot(sf)of accessible Interior space for any new residential unit and$0.22 per sf of covered floor space for new commercial/retail development. • I t"3 BECSP CR4The Applicant shall pay all applicable development Impact fees In effect at the time of building permit issuance to the Huntington Beach Union High School District to cover additional school services required by the new development.These fees are currently $2.97 per square foot(sf)of accessible interior space for any new residential unit and $0.47 per sf of covered floor space for new commercial/retail development, Impact 4.11-4 implementation of the proposed project LTS BECSP CR4.11.4 The Applicant of future Individual development projects shall pay required LTS would not result In the need for new or physically altered library and community enrichment Impact fees per Chapter 17.66 of the City's Municipal Code library facilities in order to maintain acceptable service (Library Development Fee),prior to Issuance of building permits. ratios,and the Impact would be less than significant. Recreatlon Impact 4.12-1 Implementation of the proposed project LTS BECSP CR4.12-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits,the Applicant shall demonstrate LTS could Increase the use of existing neighborhood and compliance with City parkland requirements Identified in Chapter 254.08 of the City of regional parks or other recreational facilities.However, Huntington Beach Zoning Ordinance, either through the dedication of onsite parkland or substantial physical deterioration of recreational facilities through payment of applicable fees.Any on-site park provided In compliance with this section -� would not occur or be accelerated.This would be a less shall be improved prior to final inspection(occupancy)of the first residential unit(other than than significant Impact, the model homes). Impact 4.12-2 Implementation of the proposed project PS Project CR4.12-1 would also apply. LTS would Include recreational facilities the construction of which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment.This would be a potentially significant Impact. Implementation of code requirements would reduce this ="s Impact to a less-than significant level. fl 2-22 City of Huntington Beach,Beach and Ellis Mixed-Use Project EIR