Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile 1 of 2 - Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project - Resol Ilie City ®f Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street - Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ® OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK .LOAN L. FLYNN CITY CLERIC NOTICE OF ACTION September 14, 2010 Poseidon Resources Corporation 17011 Beach Blvd , #900 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Request- Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEll2) No. 10-001- To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of a proposed 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project Applicant: Poseidon Resources Corporation, 17011 Beach Blvd., #900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Property Owners AES HB, LLC, 21730 Newland St., Huntington Beach, CA 92646, City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main St-, Huntington Beach, CA 92648; Various for off-site improvements Location- 21730 Newland Street(east side, south of Edison Avenue) On Tuesday, September 7, 2010 the Huntington Beach City Council adopted Resolution No_ 2010-63, certifying Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 10-001 (Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project)_ Attached to this correspondence is a copy of page 3 of the September 7, 2010 City Council Action Agenda, and a fully executed copy of Resolution No 2010-63 for your records If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner at (714)536-5624 S erely, 4-") JU L Flynn, CMC City Clerk Attachments- Page 3 of the City Council Action Agenda for September 7, 2010 Certified copy of Resolution No 2010-63 c- AES HB, LLC, 21730 Newland St , Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner Sister Cities Anjo, Japan e Waitakere, New Zealand (Telephone 714-536-5227) RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING — 6:43 PM CONSENT CALENDAR 2. Approve and adopt minutes Recommended Action: Approve and adopt the minutes of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Public Financing Authority regular meeting of August 2, 2010 as written and on file in the Office of the City Clerk Approved 7-0 3. Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Union High School District (HBUHSD) regarding use of School District and City Facilities Recommended Action: Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the "Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Huntington Beach and the Huntington Beach Union High School District" regarding the use of School District and City Facilities Approved 7-0 PUBLIC HEARING/ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS -4-1 through 4-5 will be heard concurrently 4-1. Adopt Resolution No. 2010-63 Certifying the final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) No. 10-001 (Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project) Recommended Action: Adopt Resolution No 2010-63, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Certifying the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No 10-001 (SCH#2001051092) for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project" as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements " Approved as amended by late communication 6-1 (Hardy No) 4-2. Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) No. 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map (TP ) No. 10-130 to amend Conditional Use Permit(CUP) No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit(CDP) No. 02-05 by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Recommended Action: A) Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10-001 and Tentative PaFGel Map with staff recommended findings and conditions of approval, and, -3- F CITY OF H NTIN T N BEACH E3 Inter-Department Communication Planning and Building Department TO: Honorable Mayor and Ci#of nal Members VIA: Fred Wilson, City Admini FROM: Scott Hess, AICP, Directlanning and Buildi4IN-1 DATE: September 7, 2010 SUBJECT: POSEIDON LATE COMMUNICATION Based on communication from Coastal Commission staff (Attachment No 5), city staff has determined that the new Poseidon project proposal and accompanying Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No 10-130 currently in process with the city require a new Coastal Development Permit (CDP) that will be scheduled for a separate City Council public hearing on September 20, 2010 Poseidon concurs and has submitted a letter regarding the CDP (Attachment No 6) Therefore, staff has made changes to the Recommended Action (see below) and associated attachments to the Request for Council Action to reflect that Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) No 10-001 will only be an amendment to the approved Conditional Use Permit No 02- 04, and the CDP and TPM will not be acted on at this meeting The revised motion and pages for City Council's consideration are attached as follQws tern No. 4-1 on the City Council Agenda - SEIR No. 10-001: ATTACHMENT NO 1 - Three errata pages added to the Final SEIR No 10-001 Item No. 4-2 on the City Council Agenda - EPA No. 10-001: REVISED Recommended Action: Motion to a) "Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10-001 to permit the Seawater Desalination Project with revised staff recommended findings and conditions of approval, and" b) "Approve revised CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts with a Statement of Overriding Considerations " c) "Continue Tentative Parcel Map No 10-130 to the September 20, 2010 meeting " ATTACHMENT NO 2 - Revised Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval for Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10-001 removing the findings for the TPM and CDP and with a change to condition no 18, and ATTACHMENT NO 3 - Revised CEQA Statement of Findings and Facts with Statement of Overriding Considerations changing two pages ATTACHMENT NO 4 - Revised powerpoint presentation SH MBB RR jr xc Joan Flynn, City Clerk, Bob Hall, Deputy City Administrator, Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager, Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner, Jan Richards, Administrative Assistant, Cathy Fikes, Administrative Assistant G\AdmLtrA2010\090710RR4(Poseidon Late Comm)doe 9- /D Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach 1 0 Executive Summary Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 1 .0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 INTRODUCTION The City of Huntington Beach (City) is preparing this Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) as the lead agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000 et seq )and the state CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et seq )to evaluate the environmental effects of the proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach This is an SEIR because the City,as lead agency, has determined that changes to the project and circumstances surrounding the project have occurred, and that new information has become available since the City certified the Final Recirculated Environmental Impact Report(REIR)for the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach on September 6, 2005 (2005 REIR) Specifically, this SEIR analyzes the project proposal of Poseidon Resources, LLC (Poseidon), which has submitted the following to the City for review and approval (1) An Entitlement Plan Amendment application (No 10-001) to amend the conditional use permit(CUP No 02-04)and coastal development permit(CDP No 02-05),or application for a new coastal development permit, application to obtain approval to construct and operate an approximately 50-million-gallon-per-day (mgd) Huntington Beach Desalination Facility and other appurtenant and ancillary water and support facilities to produce potable water (2) Plans to obtain approval to construct water conveyance facilities in the cities of Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa, Irvine and Newport Beach in order to deliver drinking water to the regional distribution system serving residents and businesses in Orange County This SEIR analyzes all components of the project, including the water conveyance facilities located outside Huntington Beach The City of Huntington Beach does not have permit jurisdiction over project components located outside its boundaries Agencies other than the City of Huntington Beach will use this SEIR when making a decision on aspects of the project that requires their approval More information on agencies expected to use this SEIR may be found in Section 2 0, Introduction and Purpose 1.2 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this SEIR is to assess and disclose potential impacts to the physical environment associated with construction and operation of the proposed project This document provides relevant information for consideration by decision makers and the general public More information on this SEIR, including details about its preparation, may be found in Section 2 0, Introduction The overall objective of the project is to provide Orange County with a long-term, reliable, high- quality,and local source of potable water Project implementation would create a local drought-proof supply of domestic water and could reduce Orange County's dependence on imported water, consistent with the goal of integrated water resource management A key advantage of the selected site is to utilize existing ocean intake/discharge lines of sufficient seawater volume to avoid the impact of constructing new ocean intake/discharge facilities The specific objectives related to the desalination facility and associated facilities and the land use applications through which re processed include the following Rd j t x z ''� City of Huntington Beach 1-1 May 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach 3 0 Project Description Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 3.4 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project consists of construction of a seawater desalination facility to provide a local, drought proof source of potable water to the subscribed water agencies in Orange County The proposed desalination project would consist of seawater intake system, pretreatment facilities, a seawater desalination facility utilizing reverse osmosis (RO) technology, post-treatment facilities, product water storage, on- and off-site landscaping, chemical storage, on- and off-site booster pump stations, and 48- to 54-inch diameter product water transmission pipelines This section presents an overall description of the proposed project by summarizing six basic project characteristics associated with the desalination facility on-site improvements, the proposed desalination facility's association with HBGS, off-site improvements, desalinated water distribution facilities, quality of potable water produced by the desalination facility, and facility operations The proposed project consists of an Entitlement Plan Amendment(No 10-001) to amend the CUP and CDP that were approved in 2006, or issuance of a new CDP The project also includes a Design Review Application (No 10-004) and a parcel map to facilitate development of a desalination facility A. ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The proposed project involves the implementation of a desalination facility producing approximately 50 MGD, or 56,000 acre-feet per year (afy) of potable water The project would require the demolition of three fuel storage tanks and the remediation of any soil/groundwater impacted by contamination associated with previous site usage as a fuel storage facility In addition, the existing berms interior to the project site would be demolished while the existing berms on the exterior perimeter of the site would remain as is On-site structures would consist of an administration building, a reverse osmosis facility building, pretreatment filter structure, solids handling building, post treatment structure, chemical storage structure , product water pump station and surge tank, flush tank, ammonia tank, fluoride tank, influent pump station, a 66 kV substation and associated connections to existing electrical transmission lines, electrical building, an aboveground product water tank, and appurtenant facilities (refer to Figure 3-6, Conceptual Site Plan) Proposed Buildings and Structures All proposed buildings and structures would comply with state and local standards in regards to fire and structural safety The proposed desalination project would consist of the following buildings and structures • Administration Building (approximately 100 feet long x 50 feet wide x 15 feet high; 5,000 square feet): This building is proposed to be Type-II, non-rated (generally defined by the California Building Code as structures incorporating non-combustible materials [steel, iron, concrete, or masonry] for structural elements, floors, walls, and roofs) and would be constructed of steel The exterior would feature flat metal wall panels running vertically along the face of the structure A metal panel roof system would be screened with a metal fascia using deep-ribbed metal panels running horizontally, and the roof will be fitted with photovoltaic solar panels All glazing would be tinted and would include clear anodized window frames (refer to Figure 3-7, Administration Building Plan/Exterior Elevations) City of Huntington Beach 3-17T10. 1 , Z Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach4 1 Land Use/Relevant Planning Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report LAND USE As noted above, Poseidon has pursued the development of the site as a seawater desalination facility since 1999 The City of Huntington Beach approved the project's conditional use permit and coastal development permit on February 27, 2006 The proposed Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach has been revised and is fully described in Section 3 0 of this SEIR The applicant has submitted an application to the City of Huntington Beach for approval of an amended coastal development permit, or a new coastal development permit, and conditional use permit that would replace the previous approvals From a land use perspective, however, the project would not substantially change from the approved project In connection with the previous approvals, the City found that the proposed project was consistent with the City's general plan, zoning and certified LCP (Broeren 2007) The project proposes to implement a seawater desalination facility and associated improvements, including a 66-kilovolt substation, on a site surrounded by industrial uses Residential uses are situated in the site vicinity, the nearest residential use is located approximately 500 feet west of the subject site The project has the potential to create impacts with regards to air quality, noise, aesthetics, hazards and hazardous materials, and short-term construction impacts (addressed in the corresponding SEIR sections) However, the proposed desalination facility would be consistent with the City of Huntington Beach General Plan, LCP, and Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, and will be subject to discretionary review and conditions of approval as part of the City's conditional use permit and coastal development permit process In addition, the proposed project would replace dilapidated fuel oil storage tanks with a desalination facility and aboveground product water storage tank, which would improve the site's aesthetic character The existing site does not provide coastal access, and the proposed desalination facility does not interfere or limit public access to the coast The project does not affect the visual elements of the coastal environment The proposed facilities are shorter than the existing structures that will be removed The City's Design Review Board has approved the design of the previously approved project, including all landscaping However, because of the proposed changes in site and building configuration, the project will require additional consideration and approval from the Design Review Board The treatment facilities are located inside an existing industrial site and will be buffered by the approved landscaping The HBGS and any modifications to that use are subject to review and approval by the California Energy Commission (CEC) As evidenced by the following statement, the CEC is aware of the proposed project and its relationship to the HBGS "AES (as the land owner) and Poseidon have filed for a Conditional Use Permit with the City of Huntington Beach to construct and operate a water desalination facility on a portion of the 53-acre site Any land use impacts generated by the desalination facility would be identified and evaluated in the City's environmental analysis" (CEC 2001, p 14) With implementation of standard construction measures and recommended mitigation measures throughout the SEIR, there are no anticipated significant land use impacts associated with short- term construction/remediation activities or long-term facility operation The proposed pipeline alignment and underground pump station are adjacent to a variety of land uses, including residential, open space, commercial, educational, medical, and recreational However, the pipelines City of Huntington Beach 4 1-19 May 2010 ATTACT 0. ATTACHMENT NO. I SUGGESTED FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001 SUGGESTED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL—ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10- 001 (AMENDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 02-04): 1. Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10-001 to amend Conditional Use Permit No 02-04 approved by City Council in 2006 that allowed the construction and operation of a seawater desalination project by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood The proposed project for the establishment,maintenance and operation of a seawater desalination project producing 50 million gallons of potable water per day which includes a 5,000 square foot administration building, 34,727 square foot reverse osmosis building, 49,481 square foot product water storage tank(30 foot high), other related accessory structures, perimeter landscaping and fencing along the project's frontage on Newland Street and Edison Avenue, and up to four miles of water transmission lines for the primary route, and optional water transmission line routes that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood The project will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks to be replaced with one 30 foot high water storage tank and lower profile and modern structures with a more attractive design consistent with the city's adopted Design Guidelines The project will further enhance the appearance of the area with the installation of 10 to 20 feet of landscaping and an eight- foot high block wall along the Edison and Newland street frontages respectively to provide additional screening and a consistent and upgraded appearance in contrast to the existing improvements The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts 2 The Entitlement Plan Amendment will be compatible with surrounding uses because the project as proposed and modified by the conditions imposed and code requirements is compatible with the properties immediately surrounding it which are primarily industrial in nature Additionally, significant setbacks including Newland Street to the west, Edison Avenue to the north, the flood control channel to the east, an existing earthen berm, 10 to 20 feet of landscaping and an eight foot high block wall along the project's Edison and Newland street frontages provide additional screening from surrounding uses Impacts pertaining to noise, light/glare, odors, and use of chemicals are also addressed to make the project compatible The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts 3 The proposed seawater desalination project including a 5,000 square foot administration building, 34,727 square foot reverse osmosis building, 49,481 square foot product water storage tank, other miscellaneous accessory structures, perimeter landscaping and fencing along the project's frontage on Newland Street and Edison Avenue, and up to four miles of 48-54 inch water transmission lines Attachment No 2 1 within the city for the primary route, and optional water transmission line routes that would convey water northerly to provide more flexibility in water delivery options will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located The project as proposed and modified by the conditions of approval is consistent with the PS-O-CZ (Public-Semipublic—Oil Production Overlay—Coastal Zone Overlay) zoning district, and meets or exceeds the minimum development standards set forth therein, and is allowed subject to approval of a conditional use permit and coastal development permit The proposed desalination facility, which will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities. 4 The granting of the Entitlement Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the General Plan It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of P (Public) on the subject property because it will produce potable water for other water suppliers to distribute to the public, and it is a use that is similar to governmental administrative and related facilities The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan including, without limitation, the following goals and policies• a Policy LU 4 1 1 (page II-LU-20) Require adherence to or consideration of the policies prescribed for Design and Development in this Plan, as appropriate The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies related to Design and Development b. Policy LU 4 1 2 (page II-LU-20) Require that an appropriate landscape plan be submitted and implemented for development projects subject to discretionary review The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to submit and implement a landscape plan c Policy LU 4 1 6 (page II-LU-20) Require that commercial and industrial development incorporate adequate drought-conscious irrigation systems and maintain the health of the landscape The project is consistent with this policy because the landscape plan includes drought-conscious irrigation systems d Policy LU 4 2 1 (page II-LU-20) Require that all structures be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City's building and other pertinent codes and regulations, including new, adaptively re-used, and renovated buildings The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable requirements related to building codes and regulations e Policy LU 4 2 4 (page lI-LU-20) Require that all development be designed to provide adequate space for access, parking, supporting functions, open space, and other pertinent elements The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies and requirements related to access, parking, supporting functions and open space Attachment No 2 2 f Policy LU 4 2 5 (page 11-LU-20) Require that all commercial, industrial, and public development incorporate appropriate design elements to facilitate access and use as required by state and federal laws such as the American's with Disabilities Act The project is consistent with this policy because it is required to adhere to all applicable policies and requirements related to accessibility g Policy LU 5 1 1 (page Il-LU-21) Require that development protect environmental resources by consideration of the policies and standards contained in the Environmental Resources/Conservation Element of the General Plan and federal (NEPA) and state (CEQA) regulations During the development review process. (a) Review any development proposal for the Bolsa Chica area, Huntington Beach wetlands, and throughout the City to ensure that no development is permitted in federally delineated wetlands, and (b) Review any development proposed for non-wetland areas to ensure that appropriate setbacks and buffers are maintained between development and environmentally sensitive areas to protect habitat quality The project is consistent with this policy because it does not propose any development in or adjacent to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitats, and provides for all required setbacks and buffers h Policy LU 71 1 (page II-LU-22) Accommodate existing uses and new development in accordance with the Land Use and Density Schedules The project is consistent with this policy because it is consistent with the General Plan Land Use and Density Schedules i Policy LU 7 1 2 (page II-LU-22) Require that development be designed to account for the unique characteristics of project sites and objectives for community character and in accordance with the Development "Overlay" Schedule (Table LU-3) as appropriate The project is consistent with this policy because it is proposed on a site that is already developed and is integrated into the site Pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas J Policy LU 7 1 5 (page II-LU-22) Accommodate the development of a balance of land uses that maintain the City's fiscal viability and integrity of environmental resources The project is consistent with this policy because it proposes redevelopment on underutilized land for productive economic use k Policy LU 13 1 8 (page II-LU-43) Ensure that the City's public buildings, sites, and infrastructure improvements are designed to be compatible in scale, mass, character, and architecture with existing buildings and pertinent design characteristics prescribed by this General Plan for the district or neighborhood in which they are located, and work with non-City public agencies to encourage compliance Attachment No 2 3 The project is consistent with this policy because the project will be an improvement by demolishing three 40 foot high fuel storage tanks The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines 1 Policy UD 2 1 1 (Page II-UD-27) Require that new development be designed to consider coastal views in its massing, height, and site orientation The project is consistent with this policy because the project plans include a number of measures to minimize adverse visual effects of the proposed facility The facility would be comprised of relatively low profile buildings reaching approximately 35 feet above the existing grade, which would comply with applicable zoning code height restrictions of 50 feet The overall appearance would be similar to a commercial office building As part of the facility design,both vegetative and architectural screening has been added to ensure that exposed pipelines, tanks, and other utility-type equipment are screened from public view The project would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect existing public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas. In addition, the project would replace three existing dilapidated fuel oil storage tanks with contemporary structures, which would improve the site's aesthetic character and result in a beneficial impact in Policy CE 7 (Page III-CE-26) Maintain and enhance the visual quality and scenic views along designated corridors The project is consistent with this policy because there are limited views across the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) site due to the height of the existing structures. However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished n Policy ERC 4.1 5 (Page IV-ERC-25) Promote the preservation of public view corridors to the ocean and the waterfront through strict application of local ordinances, design guidelines and related planning efforts, including defined view corridors The project is consistent with this policy because it would not significantly affect the scenic and visual qualities of the surrounding coastal areas and has been sited and designed to protect public views to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas, such that it is visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas o Policy AQ 1 8 2 (Page IV-AQ-15) Require installation of temporary construction facilities (such as wheel washers) and implementation of construction practices that minimize dirt and soil transfer onto public roadways The project is consistent with this policy because it is subject to mitigation measures that control dispersal of soil as a result of construction activities Attachment No 2 4 p Policy EH 12 1 (Page V-EH-24) Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand ground shaking and liquefaction such as stated in the Uniform Building Code(UBC). The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all appropriate and applicable building standards related to ground shaking and liquefaction q Policy N 12 2 (Page V-N-6) Require new industrial and new commercial land uses or the major expansion of existing land uses to demonstrate that the new or expanded use would not be directly responsible for causing ambient noise levels to exceed an exterior Ldn of 70 dB(A) on areas containing"noise sensitive" land uses as depicted on Figure N-1 The project is consistent with this policy because it will be required to adhere to all applicable noise restrictions established by the City r Policy HM 1 1.4 (Page V-HM-7) Implement federal, state, and local regulations for the handling, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials The project is consistent with this policy because it includes appropriate and adequate controls for the handling, storage, and use of hazardous materials The project will be an improvement to the area because it will result in the demolition of three 40-foot high fuel storage tanks The new proposed structures are more compatible with the surroundings because they are lower in height and have a more attractive design consistent with the General Plan and Design Guidelines There are limited views across the Huntington Beach Generating Station(HBGS) site due to the height of the existing structures However, views will be improved to the extent that the new proposed desalination project structures have a lower profile than the existing fuel storage tanks proposed to be demolished The project is required to provide a 10 foot(Edison) and 20 foot(Newland) landscape planter along the perimeter of the site to enhance the appearance of the area These landscaping improvements are required to be consistent with the approved landscaping improvements for the rest of the HBGS property to the south for a cohesive appearance The proposed water transmission lines and appurtenances are adjacent to a variety of land uses. However, they would be subsurface and are not anticipated to result in any long term land use impacts SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL—ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10- 001: 1 The site plans, floor plans, elevations, and landscaping plan received and dated August 12, 2010 shall be the conceptually approved layout with the following modifications a The landscape area on the east side of the project site on Parcel 3 shall include the removal of all Myoporum, and shall be planted with a palette of plants indigenous to the Southern California coastal community b Provide a patio along the front entrance of the administration building (DRB) c. Provide landscape planters around the administration building (DRB) Attachment No 2 5 d Provide screening for the solids loading area and filter substation compatible with the project. (DRB) e Provide screening to the top of the chemical storage, carbon dioxide, and flush tanks (DRB) f. The landscaping plan shall reflect plant materials that are more mature than the minimum code requirements subject to the approval of the City Landscape Architect (DRB) g. The applicant shall install landscaping on Parcel 2 along Newland and Edison to match the project for a consistent appearance h The landscaping and wall plan shall be consistent in design, colors, and materials with the landscaping and wall plan for AES for a cohesive appearance i The landscaping along the Newland and Edison lease area street frontages shall include the densest type and number of trees to provide the most effective screening possible and shall be maintained to the approval of the City Landscape Architect j A perimeter block wall shall be constructed along the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility/Poseidon boundary, per Public Works Department requirements (PW) k. Buildings of the subject project may not cross property lines Lot lines shall be adjusted at the proposed treatment facility accordingly (PW) 1. Revise 36"-42" City Pipeline Stub to 18"-36" City Pipeline Stub (PW) in Tree species planted along Edison Street shall not canopy over the street to avoid blocking large maintenance vehicles accessing the City Beach Operations Maintenance facility (CS) 2. Prior to issuance of demolition permits, the following shall be completed For the demolition of the three (3) 200 foot diameter fuel oil tanks, a work plan must be submitted and approved by the Fire Department prior to commencement of work (FD) 3. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the following shall be completed a The applicant shall submit written proof of final project approval by each applicable regulating agency including but not limited to the California Coastal Commission, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District and all applicable water agencies and cities b. The required Precise Grading Plan shall include the following (PW) 1) Extension of the existing 8-inch diameter City sewer main in Edison Avenue easterly to the terminus of said street Attachment No 2 6 2) Connection to the existing 8-inch sewer main along the adjacent property's northerly property line (also southerly of the existing Orange County Flood Control District's nght-of-way) shall be prohibited. c Prior to issuance of any pennit, the applicant will enter into a Franchise agreement approved and executed by the City for the generation and transport of product water from the site, and through and across the city's streets, nghts-of-way or properties (PW) (MC 3 44) d. A separate (new) irrigation water service and meter installed per Water Division Standards, and sized to meet the minimum requirements set by the landscape irrigation demand and the Water Efficient Landscape Requirements (MC 14 52) the minimum size shall be 1" (PW) e The proposed 30" tank overflow line shall be prohibited from surface discharging directly into the public right-of-way (PW) f Areas for containment shall be provided to mitigate possible spillage of any materials affecting storm water quality that may be stored on-site, and to protect the adjacent wetlands to the maximum extent feasible (PW) 4 Prior to submittal for building permits, the following shall be completed a Zoning entitlement conditions of approval shall be printed verbatim on one of the first three pages of all the working drawing sets used for issuance of building permits (architectural, structural, electrical, mechanical and plumbing) and shall be referenced in the sheet index The minimum font size utilized for printed text shall be 12 point b A Water Purchase Agreement shall be executed between the applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project and the City of Huntington Beach and shall incorporate the following: (PW) 1) The City will have the option (the"Option") to enter into a water purchase agreement("Water Purchase Agreement") to purchase water from the Project on terms essentially the same as all of the other water purchase agreements for the Project, provided, however that the City's price for up to 3,360 acre-feet per year(3 million gallons per day or 4 6 cubic feet per second) of the water purchased from the Project will be equal to the combination of(1) a 5% discount on the purchase price of water supplied by MWD via the Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) and (2) any subsidy received by the City from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California or any other third party for the purchase of water from the Project such as, but not limited to, MWDOC, and provided further that the City's price will not exceed the purchase price for Project water in the other water purchase agreements for the Project 2) The City will have the first right to purchase up to an additional 4,000,000 gallons per day(6 1 CFS) of additional water from the Project during a declared water emergency at the same costs as above for not to exceed seven days in any 30 day period and not to exceed 28,000,000 gallons in any one emergency event The definition of a declared water emergency is a 50% or greater loss of overall City water supply(not including droughts) or connected facilities such Attachment No 2 7 as distribution system,booster stations, reservoirs, wells and imported connections causing a reduction of at least 50% of the City's water supply. c The applicant/operator of the seawater desalination project will enter into an Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) approved and executed by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach (EDD) 5 The structures cannot be occupied, the final building permits cannot be approved, utilities cannot be released, the use cannot commence, and the Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued until the following has been completed: The applicant shall demonstrate that all measures required by these conditions to protect the nearby wetlands have been implemented 6 During demolition, remediation, grading, site development, and/or construction, the following shall be adhered to a. Construction equipment shall be maintained in peak operating condition to reduce emissions. b. Use low sulfur(0 5%) diesel fuel by weight in all diesel equipment c Shut off engines when not in use d. Attempt to phase and schedule activities to avoid high ozone days first stage smog alerts e Discontinue operation during second stage smog alerts f Ensure clearly visible signs are posted on the perimeter of the site identifying the name and phone number of a field supervisor to contact for information regarding the development and any construction/grading activity g Discovery of additional contamination/pipelines, etc must be reported to the Fire Department immediately and the approved work plan modified accordingly (FD) 7 The applicant shall completely remove the storage tanks from the site within 12 months from the date of approval of City building permits and agreements 8 No parking shall be permitted on the south side of Edison Ave. (PW) 9 With the development of the proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project Facility, the applicant/operator of the project will deliver potable water to the City from a location within the project site, specifically the proposed Tank Storage site The applicant/operator of the project shall provide a water pipeline from the tank storage site, a bypass water pipeline and located within the booster pump station, two pump cans including base plates, baffles, steal discharge heads, and suction manifolds per City requirements and specification (PW) 10 The applicant shall keep the facility under video surveillance 24 hours per day every day Videos should be saved for at least 30 days to provide Police with the recordmg.(PD) Attachment No 2 8 11 Post clear signage describing the acceptable behavior allowed and uses of the facility. Signs should also make it clear that there is 24/7 video surveillance.(PD) 12 The administration building should be clearly marked to help visitors.(PD) 13 The entire facility should be lighted throughout all hours of darkness, but must conform to the lighting requirements of Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No 10-001.(PD) 14. The project shall comply with the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No 10-001 15. The Planning and Building Department Director ensures that all conditions of approval herein are complied with The Planning and Building Department Director shall be notified in writing if any changes to the site plan, elevations and floor plans are proposed as a result of the plan check process Building permits shall not be issued until the Planning and Building Department Director has reviewed and approved the proposed changes for conformance with the intent of the City Council's action and the conditions herein If the proposed changes are of a substantial nature, an amendment to the original entitlement reviewed by the City Council may be required pursuant to the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance 16 The applicant and applicant's representatives shall be responsible for ensuring the accuracy of all plans and information submitted to the City for review and approval 17 The applicant/property owner and each successor in interest to the property which is the subject of this project shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof 18 Tentative Par-eel MapNo 40 130 and Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10-001 which amends Conditional Use Permit No 02-04 and Coastal Development Pen:nit N 02 05 shall become null and void unless exercised within two years of the date of final approval by the City Council of Tentative Parcel Map No 10-130, or within two years of the date of final Coastal Development Permit approval by the Coastal Commission if the Coastal Development Permit is appealed, or such extension of time as may be granted by the Director pursuant to a written request submitted to the Planning and Building Department a minimum 30 days prior to the expiration date Attachment No 2 9 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (1) Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10-001, which Amends Conditional Use Permit No 02-04, and Coastal Development Permit No 02-05— or which would result in issuance of a new Coastal Development Permit (2) Tentative Parcel Map No 10-130 (3) A Franchise Agreement between the City and Poseidon, including plans to obtain approval to construct water conveyance pipelines and appurtenant facilities in the City of Huntington Beach in order to deliver drinking water to the regional distribution system serving residents and businesses in Orange County (4) A Tank Site Exchange Agreement and Lease between the City and Poseidon (5) An Owner Participation Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon The SEIR analyzes all components of the project, including water conveyance facilities located outside Huntington Beach The City of Huntington Beach does not have permit jurisdiction over project components located outside its boundaries Agencies other than the City of Huntington Beach will use the SEIR when making a decision on aspects of the project that requires their approval More information on agencies expected to use the SEIR may be found in Section 2 0, Introduction and Purpose The SEIR was circulated for public review and comment as specified in the State CEQA Guidelines Public comments were received by the City and have been responded to by the City in accordance with CEQA requirements The City of Huntington Beach determined that the SEIR, comprised of the SEIR, a list of persons, organizations and public agencies commenting on the SEIR, comments received from the public and interested agencies, the Responses to Comments prepared by the City(including Errata to the SEIR), and all attachments and documents incorporated by reference is complete and adequate, and has been prepared in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines The SEIR identified certain significant effects on the environment that may occur if the project is approved or carried out Therefore, in accordance with CEQA, the City of Huntington Beach adopts this Statement of Findings of Facts and makes one or more of the three Section 21081 findings for each significant impact identified Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment However, unavoidable significant impacts related to both direct and cumulative impacts on short-term construction-related air quality emissions would remain as a consequence of the project, despite the incorporation of all feasible mitigation In addition, for significant effects related to indirect growth outside of the boundaries of Orange County that may occur remain unmitigated Where the decision of a public agency allows the occurrence of a significant effect, which is identified in the SEIR but is not avoided, the agency must state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the SEIR and other information in the administrative record Such a statement is called a Statement of Overriding Considerations In accordance with CEQA, therefore, the City of Huntington Beach adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations included as Section 7 0 of this Statement of Findings of Facts ATTACHMENT NO. 3, City of Huntington Beach August, 2010 Page 2 of 82 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach FINDINGS OF FACTS Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Finding for Off Site Pipelines and Underground Pump Stations The Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach off site pipelines and underground pump stations will not result in significant impacts related to geology, soils and seismicity Less than significant impact In addition, applicable mitigation measures contained within Section 4 9 of the SEIR, inclusive, further reduce these less than significant impacts Facts in Support of Finding Based on the analysis presented in Section 4 2 of the SEIR, impacts to off site pipelines and underground pump stations will not result in significant impacts related to geology, soils and seismicity The proposed product water delivery pipelines are not anticipated to result in significant impacts in regard to geology and soils, because the majority of the alignment would occur within existing street ROW and various utility lines that currently exist along the alignment Pipeline construction would be subject to standard erosion control measures similar to those implemented for the desalination facility site to contain any potential wind and water erosion on site Because the pipeline alignments being considered are relatively flat and have been graded, impacts to natural topography are not anticipated A design-level geotechnical investigation would be performed for the selected pipeline alignment to examine the potential for earthquake shaking hazards, surface rupture, shallow groundwater, and unstable soils (liquefaction, subsidence, lateral spread) Should the potential for such geological hazards exist, adequate mitigation for both pipeline construction and pipeline design would be incorporated to mitigate impacts in this regard to a less than significant level Also refer to Section 4 9, Construction- Related Impacts, of this SEIR for a more detailed evaluation of pipeline construction Construction of the proposed pump stations would also be subject to standard erosion control measures as required by local, state, and federal regulations to contain any potential wind and water erosion on site The sites are relatively flat and limited in area, thus impacts to the natural topography of the site and surrounding vicinity are not anticipated A design-level, site-specific geotechnical study would be prepared for any underground pump station and would incorporate adequate mitigation measures (if deemed necessary) for geologic hazards such as seismic shaking, surface rupture, shallow groundwater, liquefaction, subsidence, lateral spread, and landslides Because any underground pump stations would require excavation to a depth of approximately 40 feet, lateral bracing for the sides of the chamber may be necessary because the site is in a designated liquefaction hazard zone (California Geological Survey 2001) Refer to Section 4 9, Construction-Related Impacts, of this SEIR for a more detailed evaluation of pump-station construction #C. IMPACTS RELATED TO HYDROLOGY, DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER RUNOFF (SEIR pages 4.3-1 to 4.3-14) Section 4 3 of the SEIR addresses the project's potential long-term impacts related to hydrology and water quality As the proposed off site pipeline alignment and underground pump stations would be subsurface, there are no anticipated long-term impacts in regard to hydrology, drainage, and/or water quality A discussion of short-term, construction-related impacts in regard to hydrology and water quality is included under Construction-Related Impacts The remaining topics are addressed in Section 4 0-C of this Statement of Findings of Facts City of Huntington Beach August, 2010 Page 6 of 82 Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) • 13-acre propertys' behind HB No 10-001 Generating g" Station(HBGS) at Newland St Poseidon Seawatei and Edison St Desalination Projecl Includes water transmission Imes to Costa Mesa and north CRIPT GTEµ' +f � v� F� EPA to amend CUP . N' • 02-04 approved by tt l City Council in 2006 Revised plans reflect allowing protect ' • Protect sited north of previously approved location • Protect now incorporates adjacent city tank site in addition to HBGS property to create+8 6 acre parcel • Revising approved New 30 ft tall water storage tank still on corner of location,site layout, Newland and Edison replacing existing 40 ft tall floor plans,and ` tank Qa�` building elevations �'N Project architectural design slightly changed but ` comparable to prior approval mY`y Revised height and size(still in compliance with tt code) 1' OJ ECT R1 N Revised proposal includes ANALYSIS • Up to 10 miles of water transmission lines in HB and Conforms to General Plan land use and zoning Costa Mesa designations • Includes optional routes and pump stations to convey Conforms to General Plan/Coastal Element goals, water northerly policies,and objectives • Taking screened seawater from HBGS(co-located)and Meets or exceeds all development standards pumping seawater as stand alone facility in case HBGS • Conforms to Urban Design Guidelines stops using once through cooling • Demolition of three 40 foot high storage tanks ON Oft ANALYSIS ANALYSIS Land Use Compatibility Aesthetics • Still compatible with uses on-site and immediately Improves appearance by removing three 40 foot high surrounding protect fuel storage tanks • North—industrial • Amended structures still lower in profile,modern,and more attractive • East—channel,ASCON,tank farm Includes 10 to 20 foot landscape planter along • South—HBGS Newland and Edison frontage • West—Newland St,vacant • Design Review Board recommends approval • Significant setbacks provided(+200 to+1,300 ft)to residential T i �uENT N . 4 2' 2 Ad I,--ti 'MTITI� tal 0 Pro erStorage a K%MffZF—V-Zugm=sis Bldgs 1 ' T7790 V 1,T71 Ee Wmammmiffimm S4 MV 97T RECOMMENDATION 7:- Staff recommends approval of EPA because ,4,1 • Project is compatible with surrounding uses • Adequate buffering from residential and other sensitive uses is provided MV,!� Project will improve appearance of the area =r 12- L 1 • Consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations for the site -40 ATTACHMENT NO. 4-25 PWO _,^T0 RECOMMENDATION Statement of Overriding Considerations(SOC) • City Council may approve protect with SOC even if short- term construction emissions and growth inducement impacts outside of Orange County cannot be mitigated/avoided • Project's social,economic,and ecosystem/bio resources benefits outweigh these two impacts • City Council may consider these impacts acceptable and approve protect with SOC ATTACHMENT NO. y �F 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA-NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,GOVERNOR CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105-2219 - VOICE (415) 904-5200 FAX (415) 904-5400 TDD(415)597-5885 September 2, 2010 Ms. Mary Beth Broeren,Planning Manager City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: City of Huntington Beach Coastal Development Permit(CDP) 02-05—Poseidon Resources Dear Ms. Broeren: Thank you for your inquiry earlier this week regarding the proper procedures for the City of Huntington Beach(City)to modify its approval of the proposed Poseidon desalination facility We understand from the City's Notice of Public Hearing that the City Council will consider taking an action next week to amend CDP 02-05 for Poseidon's proposed desalination plant As we discussed on the phone yesterday, because the City's original approval of that CDP was appealed to the California Coastal Commission(Commission), that appeal has stayed the operation and effect of the City's approved CDP (see California Public Resources Code section 30623 and Chapter 14 California Code of Regulations section 13112) As a result of the City's approval being stayed,the City cannot amend the CDP. In addition, the Commission has already determined that the City's original approval of CDP 02-05 raises a substantial issue with respect to its conformance with the City's certified LCP, The Commission will therefore consider the project de novo and either deny the project or issue a new permit Under either scenario,the City's approval of CDP 02-05 will no longer be valid. Thus, practically, there is no longer any reason for the City to amend the CDP. To address the recent proposed project changes, including new development such as the proposed subdivision that was not part of the original CDP,we recommend that the City rescind its original approved CDP (thus making the appeal to the Commission null and void) and then make a decision on a new CDP, which might then be appealed to the Commission. This would allow the City to incorporate the complete modified project into one CDP. I hope this clarifies the status of the project review and the City's CDP. Please contact me at 415-904-5248 or tlusterncoastal.ca.gov if have any questions or would like more information. Sincerely, Tom Luster Energy,Ocean Resources, and Federal Consistency Division UAtLIMM T NO. 5 P ® s E I D ® N R E S 0 U R C E S t = Mr Ricky Ramos September 7, 2010 Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach Coastal Development Permit In Poseidon's original application, dated February 2, 2010, we requested an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No 02-04 and an amendment to Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 By this letter, we are requesting that the amendment to Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 be processed as a new Coastal Development Permit, rather than as an amendment to Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 By this reference, Poseidon hereby includes as part of the administrative record for the new Coastal Development Permit application, the application for an amendment to Coastal Development Permit No 02-05, all materials submitted by Poseidon and its agents in connection with the application for an amendment to Coastal Development Permit No 02-05, and the entire administrative record for the amendment to Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at (714) 596-7946. Sincerely, Josie McKinley Director, Project Development Poseidon Resources Corporation RFCCEIVED Poseidon Resources 17011 Beach Boulevard Suite 900 Huntington Beach CA 92647 USA Dept of Pi;`3,?ny 714 596-7946 Fax 714 596-7947 ATTACH �y t�s Executive Office 1055 Washington Boulevard Stamford CT 06901 �� Council/Agency Meeting Held_ 1d Deferred/Continued to ` j ppr ved ❑ Conditionally Ap roved ❑ Denied Cit erk igna r Council Meeting Date September 7, 2010 Department ID Number PL10-019 CITY OF HUNTINGTON REACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A Wilson, City Administrator PREPARED BY: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Building SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No 2010-63 Certifying the final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No 10-001 (Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No 10-001 which is a request by Poseidon Resources Corporation to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with an amended request to construct and operate a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project on an approximately 13 acre site The project also includes up to 10 miles of water transmission lines to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa and off-site improvements Staff is recommending that the City Council certify the SEIR because it adequately analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the project and identifies mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and General Plan policies Financial Impact: Not applicable Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution No 2010-63, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Certifying the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No 10-001 (SCH#2001051092) for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project" as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements (Attachment No 1) " Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s) 1 Deny certification of SEIR No 10-001 2 Continue SEIR No 10-001 and direct staff accordingly -57- Item 4. - Page 1 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-019 Analysis: A PROJECT PROPOSAL Applicant Poseidon Resources Corporation, 17011 Beach Blvd , #900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Property Owners AES HB, LLC, 21730 Newland St , Huntington Beach, CA 92646, City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main St , Huntington Beach, CA 92648, Various for off site improvements Location. 21730 Newland Street (east side, south of Edison Ave ) Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No 10-001 represents a request to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with an amended request to construct and operate a 50 million gallons per day (MGD) seawater desalination project including a 5,000 square foot administration building, a 34,727 square foot reverse osmosis building, a 49,481 square foot product water storage tank, and miscellaneous--accessory structures on -an approximately 13 acre site The project also includes up to 1-0 miles of water transmission lines to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa Two off-site underground booster pump stations and modifications to an existing booster pump station would be needed as part of this primary water transmission route Optional water transmission line routes and pump stations are also proposed that would convey water northerly In 2005 the City Council certified Recirculated Environmental Impact Report (REIR) No 00- 002 for the construction and operation of the seawater desalination project Early this year Poseidon applied for Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA) No 10-001 to amend Conditional Use Permit No 02-004 and Coastal Development Permit No 02-005 approved by City Council in 2006 The EPA involves a revision to the location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project The revised plans now show the project being located north of the previously approved location by incorporating the adjacent site for a future city tank The proposed 30 foot tall storage tank is still in the same location as previously approved on the corner of Newland and Edison Poseidon also submitted Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No 10-130 to subdivide three parcels totaling ±1-9 5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project Lastly, Poseidon also applied for the accompanying SEIR No 10-001 that analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with EPA No 10-001, TPM No 10-130 as well as a possible stand alone operation by Poseidon (i e Poseidon pumping seawater on their own) in the event that the Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) no longer uses once through cooling The SEIR is intended to replace REIR No 00-002 and provides a discussion of impacts by issue area and provides mitigation measures, where appropriate Specific issue areas discussed in the SEIR include Land Use/Relevant Planning, Geology/Soils/Seismicity, Hydrology/Drainage/Stormwater Runoff, Air Quality, Noise, Public Services and Utilities, Aesthetics/Light and Glare, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Construction Related Impacts, Ocean Water Quality/Marine Biological Resources, Product Water Quality, and Climate Change An analysis of alternatives to the proposed project and long-term implications resulting from project implementation are also provided Item 40 - Page 2 -58- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-019 An analysis of EPA No 10-001 is presented in a companion report that will be considered by the City Council after action on the SEIR B BACKGROUND In 2002 Poseidon submitted Conditional Use Permit No 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 to develop a seawater desalination project In 2003, on appeal, the City Council voted to deny certification of EIR No 00-02 citing a lack of information in regards to marine biology (entrainment and impingement), growth inducement, and project water compatibility To address these issues the EIR was revised and recirculated In 2005 the City Council certified REIR No 00-002 for the construction and operation of the seawater desalination project In 2006 the City Council approved Conditional Use Permit No. 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 for the implementation of the project In 2006 the California Superior Court upheld the City Council's certification of the REIR upon legal challenge by the Surfrider Foundation. Since the 2005 REIR was certified and the project approved, certain circumstances surrounding the project have changed, and new information that was not known and could not have been known at the time of certification has become available Therefore, the SEIR is proposed to address the entire revised project C STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION The SEIR provides a detailed analysis of potential impacts associated with the proposed project The issues discussed in the SEIR are those that have been identified in the course of extensive review of all potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the revised project The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the project are addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives In addition to addressing the potential impacts of the project based on a co-located condition, the SEIR also addresses seawater intake effects and certain other potential impacts of the project based on a stand-alone condition where the project would be responsible for direct intake of water in the event that the HBGS no longer uses once-through cooling With the SEIR the site plan approved by the City Council in 2006 has been added as the Alternative Facility Configuration to the proposed project Based on the 2005 REIR, the City determined that an SEIR was required to more fully investigate revised project's effects to aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise and vibration, construction-related traffic and transportation, public facilities and service systems, cumulative impacts, and growth inducement As detailed in the environmental status section of this report, through the use of appropriate mitigation measures identified in the SEIR, all potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be mitigated to a level of insignificance, with the exception of short-term construction related emissions (as was identified with the 2005 REIR) and growth inducement outside of Orange County (newly identified with the SEIR), which cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures A total of 48 comment letters were received during the 45-day public review and comment period for the SEIR and Responses To Comments have been prepared (Attachment No 2) Comments received pertained to impacts relating to marine biology, ocean water quality, construction, noise, air quality, land -59- Item 4. - Page 3 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-019 use, hazardous materials, project alternatives, and cumulative impacts, among others Staff believes that the SEIR is adequate and complies with the requirements of CEQA. D SUMMARY The SEIR serves as an informational document with the sole purpose of identifying potential environmental impacts associated with the seawater desalination project, alternatives that minimize those impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures Staff recommends that the City Council certify SEIR No 10-001 because ® The SEIR adequately addresses the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project, and ® Identifies project alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with CEQA and General Plan policies Environmental Status: In accordance with CEQA, Dudek, the city's consultant, prepared SEIR No 10-001 to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the project The document must be adopted and certified by the City Council prior to any action on EPA No 10-001 The SEIR is intended to serve as an informational document for decisions to be made by the City and responsible agencies regarding the proposed project 1 Environmental Procedures - The procedure that was followed during preparation of SEIR No 10-001 is outlined below DATE i4CTIVITV May 6 - June 21, Draft SEIR available for public review and comment for 45 days online, at City Hall, 2010 Central Library, and Banning Branch Library Notice of Completion filed with the State Clearinghouse Notice of Availability mailed to all property owners and tenants within a 2000 ft radius, all interested parties and agencies June 10, 2010 A Public Comment Meeting was held at the Central Library at 6 00 p m to give an overview of the project and take public comments June 17 - August Section 4 10 (Ocean Water Quality and Marine Biological Resources) recirculated for 2, 2010 public review and comment for 45 days due to missing pages in hard copies only August 23, 2010 Responses to Comments on Draft SEIR and Final SEIR are made available for public information and sent to Responsible Agencies and commenting parties (CEQA requires Response to Comments be sent to Responsible Agencies and commenting parties 10 days prior to certification hearing 2 Summary of SEIR No 10-001 In the preparation of an environmental impact report, potential impacts associated with the proposed development are identified and analyzed pursuant to the requirements of CEQA These impacts are categorized into three levels of significance They are less than significant impacts, impacts that can be mitigated to less than significant, and unavoidable Item 4. - Page 4 -60- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-019 significant impacts The levels of impacts associated with the proposed project are identified below a) Less Than Significant Impacts The following topical areas were determined to result in less than significant environmental impacts • Land Use and Planning • Air Quality (operational) • Hazards and Hazardous Materials (operational) • Ocean Water Quality and Marine Biological Resources • Climate Change (operational and construction) b) Less Than Significant With Mitigation/Code Requirements Through the use of code requirements and mitigation measures identified in the SEIR, the majority of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be mitigated to a level of insignificance Areas where impacts may occur and a brief description of the key recommended mitigation measures are as follows • Aesthetics/Light and Glare - Utilize minimum light levels for safety and security and lighting shall be directed to avoid spillage onto adjacent properties • Construction Related Impacts - Submit erosion control plan - Construction shall include Best Management Practices to control pollutants - Dewatering plan shall by approved by the Public Works Department, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Orange County Water District - All structures to be cleaned of hazardous materials prior to off-site transportation - Submit a traffic management plan - Conduct nesting survey adjacent to desalination project site for Belding's savannah sparrows - Conduct nesting surveys at OC-44 booster pump station site • Geology/Soils/Seismicity - Submit geotechnical report to include recommendations regarding grading, dewatering, foundations, and soil stabilization, among other - Complete removal and recompaction of compressible soils - Perform special studies and subsurface investigation related to fault rupture • Hydrology/Drainage/Stormwater Runoff - Submit a Water Quality Management Plan for approval by the Public Works Department to control pollutant runoff - Perform hydrology and hydraulic analysis to address storm water drainage and flooding - Install on-site drainage system to address stormwater -61- 1#ern 4. - Page 5 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-019 • Noise - Locate all pumps within enclosed structures with adequate setback and monitor noise levels to ensure compliance with the city's Noise Ordinance • Public Service and Utilities - Incorporate solid waste reduction and recycling methods for project construction and operation • Product Water Quality - Obtain all required drinking water permits from CA Department of _Health Services —Potential impacts in these categories can be reduced by mitigation measures suggested in the draft environmental impact report and attached to the resolution certifying the SEIR (Attachment No 1) Staff recommends incorporation of these mitigation measures into the conditions of approval for the development project (EPA No 10-001) -c) Unavoidable SLgnificant Impacts There are adverse environmental impacts that cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures relating to the following areas • Air Quality (Construction) impacts from NOx and Reactive Organic Gas emissions • Growth Inducement impacts outside of Orange County Environmental impacts associated with implementation of a project may not always be mitigated to a level considered less than significant In such cases, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be prepared prior to approval of the project, and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093 CEQA requires decision makers to balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the City may consider the adverse environmental effects acceptable In this particular case, staff believes the social, economic, and ecosystem/biological resources benefits of the proposed project outweigh the adverse impacts to air quality during the construction process as well as growth inducement impacts outside of Orange County A Statement of Overriding Considerations is required to describe the specific reasons for approving the project, based on information contained within the Final SEIR, as well as any other information in the public record and is provided in the companion report Prior to certification and adoption of the SEIR by resolution, the City Council may amend the document It should be noted, however, that removal of any of the recommended mitigation measures requires findings and justification Additionally, all mitigation measures that are approved with the SEIR must be applied to the approved project Strategic Plan Goal: Maintain financial viability and our reserves Item 4. - Page 6 -62- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/7/2010 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL10-019 Attachmenys): DesdHotion 1 City Council Resolution No 2010-63 Certif i ng Final SEIR No 10-001 2 Final SEIR No 10-001, Technical Appendices, Response To Comments, Errata under separate cover and not attached 3. Letters in Opposition and Support Not Part of Response To Comments 4 PowerPoint Presentation -63- Item 40 - Rage 7 ATTACHMENT # 1 M1 j RESOLUTION NO 2010-63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-001 (SCH#2001051092) FOR THE POSEIDON SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT WHEREAS, a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse#2001051092 ("SEIR") was prepared by the City of Huntington Beach to address the environmental implications of the proposed Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project(the "Project'); and The City completed preparation of the Draft SEIR, dated May 2010, and filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse; and The Draft SEIR was circulated for public review and comment from May 6, 2010 to June 21, 2010 Draft SEIR Section 4.10 ("Recirculated Section 4 10") was recirculated for public review and comment from June 17,2010 to August 2, 2010. The Draft SEIR and Recirculated Section 4.10 were available for review during their respective public review and comment periods as shown above at several physical locations including, City Hall, the Huntington Beach Public Library and the City's website, and Public comments have been received on the Draft SEIR and on Recirculated Section 4 10, and responses to those comments have been prepared and provided to the City Council in a separately bound document entitled "Responses to Comments for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project" (the "Responses to Comments"), dated August 2010; and The City Council held a public meeting on the SEIR (including the Draft SEIR and Recirculated Section 4.10) on September 7, 2010 and received and considered public testimony; and The City Council and the Redevelopment Agency have previously certified a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Southeast Redevelopment Project in which the Poseidon Project is located, and In the event the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency take any actions in the future in furtherance of and to carry out the Southeast Redevelopment Project which involve the Poseidon Project, any such actions would be based on the information contained in both the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Southeast Redevelopment Project and the Final SEIR for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby find, order, determine, and resolve as follows SECTION 1 Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15132, the Final SEIR for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project is comprised of the Draft SEIR and Appendices, Recirculated Section 4 10,the comments received on the Draft SEIR and Recirculated Section 4.10, the Responses to Comments, the Errata (bound together with the Responses to Comments), the 10-2590/50488 1 Resolution No. 2010-63 Appendices to the Responses to Comments and all Planning and Building Department Staff Reports to the City Council, including all minutes,transcripts,attachments, incorporation, and references. SECTION 2. The City Council finds that the Final SEIR is complete and adequate and has identified all significant environmental effects of the Project and that there are no known potential environmental impacts not addressed in the Final SEIR. SECTION 3 The City Council finds that although the Final SEIR identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the Project is approved, all significant effects which can feasibly be mitigated or avoided have been mitigated or avoided by the incorporation of Project design features, standard conditions and requirements, and by the imposition of mitigation measures on the approved Project All mitigation measures are included in the "Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist" (also referred to as the "Mitigation Monitoring Program") attached as Exhibit"A"to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. The City Council finds that the Final SEIR has described reasonable alternatives to the Project that could feasibly obtain the basic objectives of the Project(including the "No Project" Alternative), even when these alternatives might impede the attainment of Project objectives and might be more costly. Further, the City Council finds that a good faith effort was made to incorporate suggested alternatives in the preparation of the Draft SEIR and that a reasonable range of alternatives was considered in the review process of the Final SEIR and ultimate decisions on the Project. SECTION 5 The City Council finds that no "substantial evidence" (as that term is defined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15384) has been presented which would call into question the facts and conclusions in the Final SEIR SECTION 6. The City Council finds that no "significant new information" (as that term is defined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088 5) has been added to the Draft SEIR The City Council finds that the refinements that have been made in the Project or the Errata do not amount to significant new information concerning the Project, nor has any significant new information concerning the Project become known to the City Council through the public hearings held on the Project, through the comments on the Draft SEIR, through the comments on the Recirculated Section 4.10 or through the Responses to Comments SECTION 7. The City Council finds that the Mitigation Monitoring Program establishes a mechanism and procedures for implementing and verifying the mitigations pursuant to Public Resources Code 21081.6 and hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program. The mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the Project prior to or concurrent with Project implementation SECTION 8 The City Council finds and certifies that the Final SEIR reflects the independent review and judgment of the City of Huntington Beach City Council that the Final SEIR was presented to the City Council and that the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final SEIR prior to approving Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 10- 001. 10-2590/50488 2 Resolution No. 2010-63 . s SECTION 9 The City Council finds that the Final SEIR serves as adequate and appropriate environmental documentation for the Project. The City Council certifies that the Final SEIR prepared for the Project is complete, and that it has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and CEQA Guidelines. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of September ,201 0 ATTEST: A A-Ir— tc C11 Jerk Ma or INITIAT AND APPROVED: REVI D ND APPROVED: Cit/AArdnistrator VIWZ'�OF OVED AS TO FORM. C ty Atto ey ry�V _�U 10-2590/50488 3 Exhibit"A," Resolution No 2010-63 EXHIBIT A MITIGATION, MONITORING, AND REPORTING PROGRAM 1.1 INTRODUCTION As the lead agency under CEQA,the City of Huntington Beach(City)is required to adopt a program for reporting or monitoring regarding the implementation of mitigation measures to ensure that the adopted mitigation measures are implemented as defined in the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR)and listed in Table 1-1 This lead agency responsibility originates in Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 (Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting) 1.2 MONITORING AUTHORITY The purpose of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is to ensure that measures adopted to mitigate or avoid significant impacts are implemented An MMRP can be a working guide to facilitate not only the implementation of mitigation measures by the project proponent, but also the monitoring, compliance, and reporting activities of the City and any monitors it may designate The City may delegate duties and responsibilities for monitoring to other environmental monitors or consultants as deemed necessary, and some monitoring responsibilities may be assumed by responsible agencies, such as affected jurisdictions and cities The number of construction monitors assigned to the project will depend on the number of concurrent construction activities and their locations The City or its designee(s), however, will ensure that each person delegated any duties or responsibilities is qualified to monitor compliance It is the responsibility of the environmental monitor assigned to ensure that appropriate agency reviews and approvals are obtained The City or its designee will also ensure that any deviation from the procedures identified under the monitoring program is approved by the City Any deviation and its correction shall be reported immediately to the City or its designee by the environmental monitor assigned City of Huntington Beach 1-1 August 2010 Exhibit"A,"Resolution No 2010-63 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 1.3 ENFORCEMENT RESPONSIBILITY The City is responsible for enforcing the procedures adopted for monitoring through the environmental monitor assigned to each construction area Any assigned environmental monitor shall note problems with monitoring, notify appropriate agencies or individuals about any problems, and report the problems to the City or its designee 1.4 MITIGATION COMPLIANCE RESPONSIBILITY The applicant is responsible for successfully implementing all the mitigation measures in the MMRP, and is responsible for assuring that these requirements are met by all of its construction contractors and field personnel Standards for successful mitigation are implicit in many mitigation measures that include such requirements as obtaining permits or avoiding a specific impact entirely Other mitigation measures include detailed success criteria Additional mitigation success thresholds will be established by applicable agencies with jurisdiction through the permit process and through the review and approval of specific plans for the implementation of mitigation measures 1.5 GENERAL MONITORING PROCEDURES Environmental Monitors. Many of the monitoring procedures will be conducted during the construction phase of the project The City and the environmental monitor(s) are responsible for integrating the mitigation monitoring procedures into the construction process in coordination with the applicant The environmental monitor is responsible for ensuring that all procedures specified in the monitoring program are followed Construction Personnel. A key feature contributing to the success of mitigation monitoring will be obtaining the full cooperation of construction personnel and supervisors Many of the mitigation measures require action on the part of the construction supervisors or crews for successful implementation To ensure success,the following actions,detailed in specific mitigation measures, will be taken • Procedures to be followed by construction companies hired to do the work will be written into contracts between the applicant and any construction contractors Procedures to be followed by construction crews will be written into a separate document that all construction personnel will be asked to sign, denoting agreement City of Huntington Beach 1-2 August 2010 Exhibit"A,"Resolution No 2010-63 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach IVIMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report • One or more pre-construction meetings will be held to inform and train construction personnel about the requirements of the monitoring program General Reporting Procedures. Site visits and specified monitoring procedures performed by other individuals will be reported to the environmental monitor assigned. A checklist will be developed and maintained by the environmental monitor to track all procedures required for each mitigation measure and to ensure that the timing specified for the procedures is adhered to. The environmental monitor will note any problems that may occur and take appropriate action to rectify the problems 1.6 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING TABLE Table 1-1 lists the full text of mitigation measures identified for each environmental discipline plus documentation, monitoring activity, timing of implementation, and responsible monitor City of Huntington Beach 1-3 August 2010 Table 1-1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Ar n 0 p 0 '0 SU M, I SO M AV* Wt ANN ............ mlllw GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY GEO.1 A subsurface fault investigation shall be Subsurface fault Review of Prior to City Public performed in accordance with California investigation subsurface fault construction Works Dept. Geological Survey Note 49 to assess the nature investigation/su and extent of possible surface-fault rupture rvey across the southern portion of the site If evidence for potential fault-surface rupture is Confirmation found, an appropriate "setback" for structures appropriate from the zone of surface faulting will be required "setback" is implemented, if necessary GEO.2 The potential for lateral spread shall be Geotechnical Review Prior to City Public investigated as part of the site-specific investigation and geotechnical construction Works Dept. geotechnical investigation for the project, The report identifying investigation geotechnical report shall identify that areas of highly results/report geotechnical observation, laboratory testing, or expansive soils both be completed during grading to identify and to determine Confirmation CD areas of highly expansive soils and to determine the actual that necessary the actual expansion potential of finish-grade expansion measures are 0 soils Compressible soils in areas that have the potential of finish- taken during potential for lateral spread will require removal grade soils grading and recompaction in areas of proposed improvements or future fill per the specifications of a California-licensed engineer. GEO.3 A certified engineer shall ensure that all Building plans Review and Prior to City Planning structures associated with the proposed - approve issuance of and Building City of Huntington Beach 1-4 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report desalination facility have been designed to building plans grading Dept and withstand the "design-level" earthquake, as set permits applicant/ forth in the latest edition of the Uniform Building designated Code, prior to the issuance of grading permits In certified addition, the project must follow the site specific engineer geotechnical report and the professional engineer's recommendations GEO.4 A California-licensed Civil Engineer Soils and Review a soils First submittal City Public (Geotechnical) shall prepare and submit to the geotechnical and of the grading Works Dept City a detailed soils and geotechnical analysis analysis geotechnical plan and designated with the first submittal of the grading plan This analysis with California- analysis shall include sod sampling and grading plan licensed Civil laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed Engineer recommendations for grading, chemical and fill (Geotechnical) properties, liquefaction and landscaping The grading plan for the proposed project shall contain the recommendations of the final soils a and geotechnical report The recommendations shall be implemented in the design of the protect,including but not limited to the measures associated with site preparation, fill placement, z temporary shoring and permanent dewatering, groundwater seismic design features,excavation o 0 stability, foundations, soil stabilization, W establishment of deep foundations, concrete slabs and pavements,surface drainage,cement type and corrosion measures, erosion control, City of Huntington Beach 1-5 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Amltlgatl6 Me or n 01M, r1ei G al U u *141 shoring and internal bracing, and plan review GEO.5 The use of Type V cement shall be used Contract Review of Prior to and City Public for concrete, and special coatings or other specifications contract during Works Dept measures should be used to protect metal pipes specifications construction and applicant/ against the effects of corrosion to ensure use designated of Type V construction cement and contractors other measures to protect metal pipes against corrosion GEO.6 Depending upon the construction Construction Review Prior to/during City Public methods dewatering may be required in order to plans construction construction Works Dept safely excavate the sites of the proposed below plans to ensure and designated groundwater facilities, and may require some buried tanks construction form of lateral support, Groundwater pumped are anchored or contractors from the dewatering wells will need to meet other method is National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System used to prevent permit requirements before it is discharged(refer floating to Section 4 9,Construction-Related Impacts) In order to prevent the buried tanks (and certain pipelines)from"floating"when water levels in the tanks/pipelines are drawn down, it will be necessary to either "anchor" them down, add additional weight to the tanks/pipelines themselves, and/or add sufficient soil surcharge across the to of the tank/pipelines City of Huntington Beach 1-6 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report y pp iullt� �t e� W ctiiii '�; `;s .�.i.'` .,,y� `;"?S?,':.,�*,.. °v��' � ,',�� Y "? '"a�, •'�"H2"�"'`„o Aa a�, rt �"`3 '"h'✓+?, SGaa`°"s., � 'tii„ GEO-7 Compressible soils in areas that have Construction Review Prior to/during City Planning the potential for lateral spread will require plans construction construction and Building removal and recompaction or future fill per the plans to ensure Dept and specifications of a California-licensed engineer lateral spread designated This process will require dewatering and support in areas with California- of walls of excavation or use of deep foundations compressible licensed such as stone columns or piles and grade soils is engineer beams to support proposed structures prevented GEO.8 The proposed project shall incorporate Construction Review final Concurrent City Planning recommended measures of the final soils and plans soils and with submittal and Building _ geotechnical/seismic analysis to stabilize geotechnical/se of first grading Dept. and structures from on-site soils known to be prone ismic analysis plan applicant/ to liquefaction Typical methods include, but are and designated not limited to construction construction • Over-excavation and recompaction of plans to ensure contractors soils structures from a • In situ soil densification, such as vibro- on-site soils flotation or vibro-replacement (i e., known to be o stone columns) prone to o • Injection grouting liquefaction are o • Deep soil mixing stabilized o 0 GEO-9 A California-licensed Civil Engineer Soils and Review soils Concurrent City Public W (Geotechnical) shall prepare and submit to the geotechnical and with submittal Works Dept City a detailed soils and geotechnical analysis analysis geotechnical of first grading and designated with the first submittal of the grading plan This analysis, plan California- City of Huntington Beach 1-7 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report K�Il�itigFatiottMu ure,w rpleri :f„��j�.1T' analysis shall include soil sampling and including soil licensed Civil laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed sampling and Engineer recommendations for grading, chemical and fill laboratory (Geotechnical) properties, liquefaction and landscaping The testing grading plan prepared for the proposed project shall contain the recommendations of the final soils and geotechnical report These recommendations shall be implemented in the design of the project including but not limited to measures associated with site preparation, fill placement, temporary shoring, and permanent dewatenng, groundwater seismic design features, excavation stability, foundations, soil stabilization,establishment of deep foundations, concrete slabs and pavements, surface drainage, cement types and corrosion measures, erosion control, shoring and internal a bracing and plan review HYDROLOGY, DRAINAGE,AND STORMWATER RUNOFF HWQ-1 The City of Huntington Beach shall Hydrology and Review Prior to the City Public require that prior to the issuance of grading hydraulic study hydrology and issuance of Works Dept o permits the applicant's Licensed Civil Engineer hydraulic study grading and applicant's N prepare a hydrology and hydraulic study to identifying the permits Licensed Civil identify the effects of potential stormwater runoff effects of Engineer from the project on the existing storm drain flows potential for the 10-, 25-, and 100-year design storm stormwater events The study shall identify existing runoff runoff from the City of Huntington Beach 1-8 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project ed Huntington Beach K8K8RP Final S ba nt Environmental Impact Report AV and proposed runoff,in addition to existing storm project on the drain system capacity at the site discharge existing storm location to the nearest down-gradient main drain flows for junction The applicant shall design site drainage the 10-, 25-, and document that the proposed project would and 1 00-year not increase peak storm event flows over design storm existing conditions for the design storm events events HWQ-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits Construction Review Prior to the City Public (not including demolition permits),an appropriate plans construction issuance of Works Dept. on-site drainage system th at integrates plans and building and applicant/ permanent stormwater quality features shall be ensure on-site permits (not designated installed for the project drainage including contractors system that demolition integrates permits) permanent stormwater quality features 37, is installed CD HWQ-3 Prior to issuance of grading permits,the Plan to minimize Review plan to Prior to City Fire Dept applicant shall submit to the City for approval a risks of tsunami minimize or issuance of and applicant plan outlining the specific planning measures to reduce risks to grading Z 0 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report gatianMeasir ,: gF a, a / (b) identification of the method for transmission of tsunami watch and warnings to facility personnel and persons on the site in the event a watch or warning is issued, and(c)identification of an evacuation site for persons on site in the event of a tsunami warning NOISE NO1.1 All pumps located outdoors (i e,, Building plans Review building During City Planning seawater intake pumps, filter effluent transfer plans and installation of and Building pumps,and stand-alone pumps)shall be located ensure outdoor outdoor Dept. and within enclosed structures with adequate pumps are pumps and applicant setback and screening,as necessary,to achieve installed within during acceptable noise levels at the property lines of enclosed operation nearby residences in accordance with the City of structures Huntington Beach's Noise Ordinance, Once the stationary noise sources have been installed, Monitor after noise levels shall be monitored to ensure installation to compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance If ensure stationary noise sources exceed levels specified compliance with in the City's Noise Ordinance, an acoustical Noise engineer shall be retained by the project Ordinance applicant to install additional noise attenuation o measures in order to meet the applicable noise o standard. W Public Services and Utilities PSU-1 The applicant shall coordinate with the Construction and Review Prior to City recycling City of Huntington Beach's recycling operation plans construction construction representative City of Huntington Beach 1-10 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact ReportMi`t`Igtjon�Me O $ .d a,,, n ;#iA IN , .61 CM, y - representative—to-ensure that the proposed and operation and applicant project is in compliance with the City's waste plans to ensure reduction and recycling program compliance with waste reduction and recycling program PSU-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, Waste reduction Review and Prior to the City recycling the applicant shall prepare a waste reduction plan approve waste issuance of a coordinator and plan for the generation of construction and reduction plan grading permit applicant operational waste from the proposed project, to ensure This plan will be submitted to the recycling Assembly Bill coordinator from the City of Huntington Beach, 939 who will ensure that Assembly_ Bill 939 requirements requirements are properly addressed are properly addressed a+ Aesthetics/Light and Glare ALG-1 The applicant shall submit full design Design plan that Review design Prior to City Planning a details pursuant to City of Huntington Beach specifies plan and construction and BuildingCD requirements for design review submittals that architectural ensure Dept. and will specify architectural treatments that minimize treatments that architectural applicant 0 visual impacts The design shall specify the minimize visual treatments o following- impacts minimize visual N • For areas visible from adjacent, impacts 12 existing, or proposed residential °`W areas,exterior mechanical equipment shall be screened from view on all sides, and rooftop mechanical City of Huntington Beach 1-11 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report ti U -J, I%Kip W� IN piz rsllg'4 4 w pp equipment shall be set back 15 feet from the exterior edges of the building • Equipment to be screened includes, but is not limited to, heating, air conditioning, refrigeration equipment, plumbing lines, duct-work, and transformers, • Said screening shall be architecturally compatible with the building in terms of materials and colors • If screening is not designed specifically into the building,a rooftop mechanical equipment plan showing screening must be submitted for > review and approval with the CD W application for building permit(s) 0 ALG-2 The applicant shall submit a lighting plan Lighting plan Review lighting Prior to City Planning to be reviewed and approved by the City The plan construction and Building plan shall. Dept and • Specify that light intensity for outdoor applicant lighting shall be limited to that necessary for adequate security and safety • Demonstrate that outside lighting shall City of Huntington Beach 1-12 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project od Huntington Beach K8K8RP Final S bm entEnvironmental I Report be directed to prevent spillage onto adjacent properties PRODUCT WATER QUALITY PW-1 Prior to project operations,the applicant Drinking water Review Prior to City Planning shall obtain all required drinking water permits permits required operati and Building from the California Department of Health drinking water on Dept and Services, These permits are anticipated to permits applicant consist of the following. • A Wholesale Drinking Water Permit (on August 10, 2002, the California Department of Health Services issued a conceptual approval letter for the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach) • An Administrative Change to Retail Agencies' Drinking Water Permit (to include desalinated water from the Iff proposed project as an approved source of supply for the California Department of Health Services) P*2 During final design of the proposed Design plans Review design Prior to City Planning project, the applicant shall incorporate the plans and construction and Building following six provisions to protect water quality in ensure Dept , Public the event of"non-routine"operations(defined as provisions are Works Dept , operations such as seawater emergency intake incorporated to and applicant pump shutdowns and failures, electricity protect water equipment malfunctions, excessively high quality in the City of Huntington Beach 1-13 August 2010 � p Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Reportlitiga`t�dnImp a t t�t� l�ox �7/7«�y;yam{ r' '�`t/Y',.■/"�"y}'in, }r /�) ., t y <,< on` 01lY' A ;fit T ✓ 5 J y s 8w temperature of the cooling water, etc) event of"non- Automatic Control Interlock between routine" HBGS Pumps and Desalination operations Facility Intake Pumps,The shutdown controls of the desalination facility intake pumps shall be interlocked with the HBGS pumps so that during co-location, when HBGS pump operation is discontinued to prepare for heat treatment, non-routine, or even routine pump shutdown, this would automatically trigger an alarm at the desalination facility along with shutdown of the desalination intake x pumps After this emergency shutdown, the intake pumps shall be started up manually, and the a operations staff would be required toCD Cn check the reason of shutdown with a the HBGS staff before restarting the treatment facility intake pumps • Continuous Intake Pump Flow o Measurement Devices Seawater o intake pumps shall be equipped with W flowmeters, which would record the pumped flow continuously If the intake flow is discontinued for an City of Huntington Beach 1-14 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report `iig�t' rt Me s reason, including non-routine HBGS operations, automatic intake pump shutdown shall occur • Continuous Intake Water Temperature Measurement Devices The desalination facility intake pump station shall be equipped with instrumentation for continuous measurement of the intake temperature Any fluctuations of the intake temperature outside preset normal limits shall trigger alarm and intake pump shutdown This monitoring equipment shall provide additional protection against heat treatment or other unusual intake y water quality conditions • Continuous Intake Water o Salinity/Conductivity Measurement R Devices, The desalination facility intake pump station shall be o equipped with instrumentation for continuous measurement of the intake seawater salinity Any W fluctuations of the intake salinity outside preset normal operational limits shall trigger an alarm and City of Huntington Beach 1-15 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report F Miti anon°Mean r il 3 %E Im`lePri� tia o " ° Triri n i ate ` initiate intake pump shutdown This monitoring equipment shall provide additional protection against discharge of unusual freshwater/surface water streams in the facility outfall • Continuous Intake Water Oil Spill/Leak Detection Monitoring Devices The desalination facility intake pump station shall be equipped with instrumentation for oil spill/leak detection. Detection of oil in the intake water, even in concentrations lower than 0 5 milligrams per liter, shall automatically trigger an alarm and y initiate intake pump shutdown This monitoring equipment shall provide CD additional protection against unusual intake water quality conditions • Routine Communication with HBGS o Staff While the desalination facility is o in operation in conjunction with the HBGS,the desalination facility staff of each shift shall be required to contact HBGS personnel at least once per shift and inquire about unusual City of Huntington Beach 1-16 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report �Iitg( tidlMealre `' v planned or unplanned events at the HBGS If non-routine operations are planned at the HBGS, the desalination facility shall modify desalination facility operations accordingly PW-3 During project operations, the RO Design and Review design During City Planning membrane system shall be continuously operation plans and operation operation and Building monitored for feed seawater and permeate plans and Dept and conductivity and the differential pressure through ensure RO applicant/ the membranes. If permeate salinity (i e , total membrane designated dissolved solids) concentration exceeds the system is monitors design level, membranes shall be cleaned to monitored for recover their original performance capabilities feed seawater and permeate conductivity and the differential 0 pressure through the membranes z 0 PW-4 Prior to project operations, the Earthquake Review and Prior to City Fire Dept. o desalination facility operations staff shall develop preparedness approve operation and applicant/ o an earthquake preparedness plan, which shall plan earthquake desalination W be reviewed and approved by the City of preparedness facility Huntington Beach. The plan shall be In plan operations staff compliance with all applicable regulations and City of Huntington Beach 1-17 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project ed Huntington Beach K8K8RP Final S shall include safety planning documentation providing measures that include but are not limited to coordination procedures with appropriate agencies and facility operations procedures to ensure water delivery under earthquake emergency conditions are maintained PW-5 Prior to project operations, a corrosion Building plans Review building Prior to City Public monitoring system shall be installed in the plans and operation Works Dept proposed transmission pipeline at points of ensure interconnection with the existing water corrosion distribution system to ensure that the proposed monitoring corrosion control measures are effective and system is adequate The corrosion monitoring system will installed include monitoring beyond the point of connection in order to monitor downstream effects, if required by MWD 10 PW-6 To protect against potential taste and Flushing program Review flushing Prior to City Public CD odor problems associated with the startup of program and operation Works Dept and facility operations, a sequential flushing program ensure applicant shall be initiated just prior to project startup that coordination Z shall be coordinated with the involved water with water agencies to minimize sediment disturbance that agencies to I 9 might occur due to flow reversal in a portion of minimize the existing distribution system sediment disturbance PW-7 Prior to project operations, a sampling Design plan Review design Prior to and City Public City of Huntington Beach 1-18 August2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach K0K8RP Final S ba t Environmental Impact Report location shall be established near the physical plan and during Works Dept and connection of the transmission pipeline to the ensure operation applicant OC-44 feeder A monitoring program shall be sampling implemented for this location incorporating the location is following parameters coliform bacteria, established and heterotrophic bacteria, chlorine residual, monitored disinfection byproducts, and aesthetic during parameters such as turbidity,odor, and color,as operation well as corrosion indices PW-8 Prior to project operations,the applicant Operating Review Prior to City Public shall coordinate with and obtain approval as approvals and approvals and operation Works Dept and required from applicable local and regional water agreements agreements applicant agencies that ow-n-and operate the distribution with system with which the desalinated water would appropriate come in contact Various operating approvals local/regional and corresponding agreements shall be signed water agencies before the desalinated water is introduced into the local distribution system 01;111 M-1 kw CONSTRUCTION - HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY CON-11 Concurrent with the submittal of any Erosion Control Review Erosion Concurrent City Public z q Grading Plan or Demolition Plan, the Applicant Plan Control Plan with the Works Dept and shall submit an Erosion Control Plan to the City submittal of applicant of Huntington Beach Public Works Department any Grading for review and approval,which shall include the Plan or following measures: Demolition * Where necessary, temporary and/or Plan City cf Huntington Beach 1-19 Auguot2O1O Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report io M"'I I'M 1 it 4 M U permanent erosion control devices, as approved by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, shall be employed to control erosion and provide safety during the rainy season from October 15 to April 15 • Equipment and workers for emergency work shall be made available at all times during the rainy season Necessary materials shall be available on site and stockpiled at convenient locations to facilitate the rapid construction of temporary devices when rain is imminent • Erosion control devices shall not be moved or modified without the > approval of the City of Huntington CD Beach Public Works Department 0Cn • All removable erosion protective devices shall be in place at the end of z each working day when the 5-day 0 rain probability forecast exceeds 40% • After a rainstorm, all silt and debris shall be removed from streets, check berms, and basins. —J City of Huntington Beach 1-20 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report ', y� • Graded areas on the permitted area perimeter must drain away from the face of the slopes at the conclusion of each working day Drainage is to be directed toward desalting facilities • The permittee and contractor shall be responsible and shall take necessary precautions to prevent public trespass onto areas where impounded water creates a hazardous condition • The permittee and contractor shall inspect the erosion control work and ensure that the work is in accordance with the approved plans • Water shall be applied to the site twice daily during grading operations or as otherwise directed by the o County of Orange Inspector in 0 compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District z 0 (SCAQMD) Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust Emissions), A grading operations plan may be required, including watering procedures to minimize dust and equipment rocedures to City of Huntington Beach 1-21 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report <%1 ��r5�S''a�r�""'s� N'y`,a ., �zP �I �'*ywm,� r/`.t' 7y'/�} }� h�� i"n " r/ y # � s zY f fy r F����MR W ✓ f^\�, 'fry s 'b 'y r' "Y� /sY' yh s «£Grr � �'J M � V-Rt �2✓°'«rV " ra' P S° � �rr r N �°° .✓-. �` *r,;r 4¢� .L� ";��y`' �,�d� a� yr � /, � r�§�.,� r n, �i+ Yi�}'v��v`{�fpn N£ 3 minimize vehicle emissions from grading equipment CON-2 Construction of the project shall include Contract Review and Prior to City Public best management practices(BMPs)as stated in language and approve construction Works Dept and the Orange County Stormwater Management construction contract designated Program's Drainage Area Management Plan plans specifications construction (DAMP) BMPs applicable to the project include and contractors the following construction • Silt fences installed along limits of plans work, the project construction site, or both • Stockpile containment(i e ,visqueen, fiber rolls, gravel bags, etc) M • Hillside stabilization structures (i e , fiber matrix on slopes and construction access stabilization a mechanisms, etc) • Street sweeping 0 • Tire washes for equipment • Runoff control devices(i.e , drainage swales,gravel bag barriers/chevrons, o velocity check dams, etc.) W CON-3 As part of its compliance with the Permit Review Prior to City Public NPDES requirements, the applicant shall registration Stormwater construction Works Dept and prepare permit registration documents (PRDs) documents Pollution applicant City of Huntington Beach 1-22 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Reportlitia iu �ll a Car � "�,;�"' "�4`�3.�. � �'�� ` ;? W:n ,:1•.� r� " . ,�'r`a E o4,'v.�,`, e i �:M �' y a» P ;,.z � al :;y1� i`,' „�., ry fF' f>ar iaa `"f" t C ` As that include a Notice of Intent (NOI) to be (PRDs), Notice of Prevention Plan submitted to the Santa Ana Regional Water Intent (NOI), and (SWPPP), Quality Control Board providing notification and Stormwater permit intent to comply with the State of California Pollution registration general permit prior to any construction Prevention Plan documents occurring Prior to filing the PRDs, completion of (SWPPP) (PRDs), and a stormwater pollution prevention plan(SWPPP) Notice of Intent shall be required for construction activities on (NOI) site A copy of the SWPPP shall be available, implemented, and amended at the construction site at all times CON-4 As part of its compliance with the Permit Review permit Prior to City Public NPDES requirements, the applicant shall registration registration construction Works Dept and prepare permit registration documents (PRDs) documents documents and applicant that include a Notice of Intent (NOI) to be (PRDs) and (PRDs),Notice dewatering submitted to the Santa Ana Regional Water Notice of Intent of Intent(NOI), activities Quality Control Board providing notification and (NO]) and additional intent to comply with the State of California requirements of CD general permit prior to any construction NPDES permit o occurring According to the risk level assessed to (Order No 0 the discharges of the project, the applicant will 2009-0009 z comply with additional requirements of NPDES DWQ N permit (Order No. 2009-0009 DWQ (CAS000002)) (CAS000002)) to be effective July 1, 2010. W These include numeric action levels and/or numeric effluent limitations for pH and turbidity, the preparation of rain event action plans, City of Huntington Beach 1-23 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report If atiar� rill ;�; ;;u; mperi at, onl arm" n , .� Via` le a �pilia te`" kitu monitoring for pH and turbidity, and bioassessments CON-5 Prior to any dewatering activities, the NPDES and Review and Prior to City Public applicant shall obtain and comply with a general Orange County ensure dewatering Works Dept and dewatering NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Sanitation District adherence to activities applicant Regional Water Quality Control Board Prior to permit NPDES and dewatering into a sanitary sewer system, the Orange County project applicant will obtain the required permit Sanitation and adhere to the conditions outlined in the District permits permit issued by the Orange County Sanitation District CON-6 Prior to receiving any grading or building Grading and Review and Prior to City Public permit, the applicant shall prepare a precise drainage plan approve permitting Works Dept and grading and drainage plan containing the grading and applicant recommendations of the final soils and drainage plan geotechnical analysis for temporary and permanent groundwater dewatering, as well as Obtain approval for surface drainage,for review and approval by from Santa the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Ana Regional Board and the City of Huntington Beach Public Water Quality Works Department The dewatering plan shall Control Board o ensure treatment in compliance with the NPDES N dewatering permit to be issued by the Santa Ana o Regional Water Quality Control Board Where W necessary, a dewatering treatment system shall be employed to remove contaminants For instance, for treatment of volatile organic City of Huntington Beach 1-24 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report I =M a Ur`°r �' �,' ,'��w r�`/ // v /�a �y gC �'y j Fri compounds such as trichloroethylene, the system may employ at least two beds of granular activated carbon in series in addition to physical processes used to reduce suspended solids The applicant will comply with the approved dewatering plan The dewatering plan will include provisions for the installation and operation of a monitoring well system for the duration of the desalination facility construction period The monitoring well system will ensure that construction activities do not have any measurable impacts on groundwater quality outside of the boundaries of the desalination facility site, The City of Huntington Beach shall require that the applicant prepare a groundwater hydrology study to determine the lateral a transmissivity of area soils and a safe pumping yield such that dewatering activities do not interfere with nearby water supplies The groundwater hydrology study shall make oz recommendations on whether permanent N groundwater is feasible within the constraints of 0 a safe pumping level W CON-7 Prior to issuance of any grading permits, Notification to Ensure Orange Prior to City Public the applicant shall inform the Orange County Orange County County Water permitting Works Dept and Water District (OCWD) of its plans for on-site Water District District applicant City of Huntington Beach 1-25 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report e^raEa �W, y Mxr� � ^� /�' � _..�" � e'+z'v:'' - �Ex s��"�1,� ,&.8;°�i✓.�' 17 iRtM 1.S7^.. ,� � ;Y. dewatering and, if necessary,acquire necessary (OCWD) (OCWD) is permits and approvals from the OCWD to ensure informed of that no adverse impacts on the groundwater dewatering basin or seawater intrusion barrier occur as a plans and result of the proposed project The applicant permits are would comply with any approved dewatering acquired (if permits or plans required) CON-8 During dewatering operations, a survey Dewatering Review and During City Public program shall be conducted on surrounding survey program approve construction Works Dept properties and structures to ensure that dewatering and movement or settlement from on-site dewatering survey program dewatering operations does not occur This survey program operations would be subject to approval by the City of Huntington Beach Engineer and shall outline measures to be completed in the event that movement or settlement is identified, which could include discontinuing dewatering activities CON-9 Should on-site dewatering operations Permits and Review Prior to City Public C require discharge into the sanitary sewer approvals from applicable dewatering Works Dept and 0 system, the applicant shall obtain applicable the Orange permits and operations applicant permits and approvals from the Orange County County Sanitation seek approval Sanitation District and City of Huntington Beach District and City from the o Public Works Department prior to any of Huntington Orange County o dewatering operations Should the dewatering Beach Public Sanitation discharge be directed to existing AES storm Works District drain facilities, the Applicant shall ensure that Department dewatering is addressed in the applicant's Santa City of Huntington Beach 1-26 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report iC?I 1�y f t� �Y,f z w» ���" x!eBu $v+� .� n ��R<s r✓ Tr'� -, ti •' v a� / a a £9 r 4 *a E Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board NPDES permit CONSTRUCTION -AIR QUALITY CON-10 Prior to issuance of any grading Grading plan Review grading Prior to City Public permit,the applicant shall demonstrate(through plan and issuance of Works Dept and submittal of a grading plan to the City of ensure dust grading permit applicant Huntington Beach) that, in compliance with suppression and during SCAQMD Rule 403, excessive fugitive dust techniques are construction emissions shall be controlled by regular watering implemented to or other dust prevention measures, as specified prevent fugitive in the SCAQMD's rules and regulations In dust addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 requires the implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance k off site Implementation of the following measures would reduce short-term fugitive dust impacts on nearby sensitive receptors • Active portions of the construction site shall be watered twice daily to prevent excessive amounts of dust 0 • On-site vehicle speed shall be limited o to 15 miles per hour N 0 • All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible,watered twice daily, or chemically stabilized • Visible dust beyond the property line City of Huntington Beach 1-27 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach IV MRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report �.tigati as° r ' r � ;y�ri =- >I Fs1t . _ w hyd � ����9��� '�. eµ r,�� ar,"p:�` ,�`,+�� �' } i^ja �la Rt� 1!1` t�� � � � V3►�iiyy � s:a5'e�" ! z,e 4 gs� that emanates from the project shall be prevented to the maximum extent feasible • All material transported off site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust prior to departing the job site • Track-out devices shall be used at all construction site access points • All delivery truck tires shall be watered down,scraped down,or both prior to departing the job site • Non-toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied to all disturbed construction sites that will be inactive for 10 days a or more • All excavating and grading operations shall be suspended when wind gusts (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 miles per hour o • A construction relations officer shall be appointed to act as a community W liaison concerning on-site construction activity including resolution of issues related to fugitive City of Huntington Beach 1-28 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report I", loni, Z W2,4 00 AO 1 0-61 dust CON-1 1 All trucks that are to haul Construction Review plans Prior to the City Public excavated or graded material on site shall plans and confirm issuance of Works Dept. and comply with California Vehicle Code Section that hauling grading permit applicant 23114(b)(F)(e)(4) as amended, regarding the activities shall and during prevention of materials spilling onto public comply with construction streets and roads Prior to the issuance of California grading permits, the applicant shall demonstrate Vehicle Code to the City of Huntington Beach Engineer how Section the project operations subject to that 23114(b)(F)(e)( specification during hauling activities shall 4) comply with the provision set forth in Sections 23114(b)(F)(e)(4) CON-12 Prior to issuance of a grading Contract Review Prior to the City Public permit, the City of Huntington Beach Engineer language and maintenance issuance of Works Dept and and the chief building official shall confirm that construction records and grading permit Planning and the grading plan, building plans, and equipment ensure Building Dept specifications stipulate that, in compliance with vehicles construction CD SCAQMD Rule 403, 03 precursor emissions maintenance equipment from construction equipment vehicles shall be records vehicles controlled by maintaining equipment engines in engines are z 0 good condition and in proper tune per maintained in manufacturer's specifications,to the satisfaction good condition ,1P of the City Engineer. Maintenance records shall be provided to the City The City Inspector shall be responsible for ensuring that contractors comply with this measure during construction, City of Huntington Beach 1-29 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report E�I �IO�� s+���a�+w�,�_-° z << a may' /� /��y> Amp �{ �y /��yy lifA.�7� s,, F'x y ,�.,»rµ1R� ! 1rRA1 ldim#I ^� ,kFi S;fa*. ",V��€�, v, Ignn-r1 l'1111' CON-13 The following measures shall be Contract Review contract During City Planning implemented by the contractor to reduce ROG language and specifications construction and Building emissions resulting from application of construction and ensure Dept and architectural coatings plans reduction of applicant/ • Use high-pressure-low-volume paint ROG emissions designated applicators with a minimum transfer are achieved contractor efficiency of at least 50% through best • Use required coatings and solvents management with an ROG content lower than practices required under Rule 1113 • Utilize building materials that do not require painting to the extent feasible • Use pre-painted construction materials a' CON-14 Prior to issuance of a grading Diesel Fuel Review Diesel Prior to City Public permit, a Diesel Fuel Reduction Plan shall be Reduction Plan Fuel Reduction issuance of Works Dept and a submitted to the City Engineer This plan shall Plan grading permit applicantCD identify the actions to be taken to reduce diesel i✓ fuel emissions during construction activities (inclusive of grading and excavation activities) z Reductions indiesel fuel emissions can be °, achieved by measures including but not limited to the following, a) use of alternative energy sources, such as compressed natural gas or liquefied petroleum gas, in mobile equipment and vehicles; b use of "retrofit technology," City of Huntington Beach 1-30 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report including diesel particulate traps, on existing diesel engines and vehicles, and c) other appropriate measures Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Diesel Fuel Reduction Plan shall be filed with the City of Huntington Beach The plan shall include, at a minimum, the following provisions • All diesel-fueled off-road construction equipment shall be California Air Resources Board certified or use post-combustion controls that reduce pollutant emissions to the same level as California Air Resources Board certified equipment California Air Resources Board certified off-road engines are engines that are 3 years old or less and comply with lower emission standards Post-combustion CD controls are devices that are installed downstream of the engine on the 0 tailpipe to treat the exhaust These z devices are now widely used on construction equipment and are capable of removing over 90%of the PM10, CO, and volatile organic compounds from engine exhaust, depending on the specific device, City of Huntington Beach 1-31 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report , >� '`� * �i was,r` .r r � Yz� Fl l 1!y ,.. ,"G •�y ; � �i� , `a �� !�� Qit� "��y¢y�,. .y i4aP,s` � sulfur content of the fuel, and specific engine The most common and widely used post-combustion control devices are particulate traps (e.g , soot filters), oxidation catalysts, and combinations thereof • All diesel-fueled on-road construction vehicles shall meet the emission standards applicable to the most current year to the greatest extent possible To achieve this standard, new vehicles shall be used, or older vehicles shall use post-combustion controls that reduce pollutant emissions to the greatest extent feasible a • The effectiveness of the latest diesel emission controls is highly dependent o on the sulfur content of the fuel Therefore, diesel fuel used by on- z and off-road construction equipment o shall be low sulfur(less than 15 ppm) o or other alternative, low-polluting all diesel fuel formulation CON-15 Prior to the issuance of grading Contract Review contract Prior to the City Public permits, the applicant shall ensure evidence language and language and issuance of Works Dept , acceptable to the City of Huntington Beach construction construction grading Planning and City of Huntington Beach 1-32 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach IVIMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report t � ettt?�# dry = y y� ,M �< , "<✓ jam, r vi ,,, >, �y n�', �h st> _ e r .�( y Planning and Building Department and Public plans plans permits Building Dept , Works Department that and applicant • Construction vehicles or equipment, Ensure fixed or mobile, shall be equipped construction with properly operating and noise does not maintained mufflers and other state- exceed City's required noise attenuation devices, noise ordinance • Operations shall comply with the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Chapter 8 40 (Noise Control) • Property owners and occupants located within 1,200 feet of the desalination facility boundary shall be sent a notice, at least 15 days prior to commencement of construction of each phase, regarding the construction schedule of the proposed project A sign, legible at a o distance of 50 feet shall also be posted at the project construction site, All notices and signs shall be z 0 reviewed and approved by the City prior to mailing or posting and shall indicate the dates and duration of W construction activities, as well as provide a contact name and a telephone number where residents City of Huntington Beach 1-33 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report fitly tl6 MrS .Y m .: ^ 111 �@I11 �t cwl\/k A�t A;fYd k^ ,y x hI ', OI.7Gr j 8£u N O 4 ,� n€tom ��� FY?'° /y ►Yy��y�pp ]i /� k7'T"i V .€ can inquire about the construction process and register complaints • Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City's Building Official how construction noise reduction methods (e g , shutting off idling equipment, installing temporary acoustic barriers around stationary construction noise sources, and maximizing the distance between construction equipment staging areas and occupied residential areas) shall be used where feasible - • Construction haul routes shall be y designed to avoid noise-sensitive uses(e g ,residences,schools,etc) o • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be z placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise 0 receivers W CONSTRUCTION - UNDERGROUND UTILITIES CON-16 Unless underground utility Construction plan Verify Prior to City Public locations are well documented, as determined underground construction Works Dept and City of Huntington Beach 1-34 August 2010 Seawater Desalmation Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report qw , - ya=�x � a � ��' h� �E'. �r °✓, a�i `q+.!a .c� �:r,, " vr. � � k r` s' vim. 9 FIR g � l„ � ai 3.,n d� � 7✓ '.rl �Y a 6� -x y�ai e � _ w9 ,<-' by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works utility locations applicant Department, the project engineer shall perform If necessary, geophysical surveys to identify subsurface review utilities and structures, and incorporate the geophysical findings into site design prior to construction surveys Pipelines or conduits that may be encountered conducted within the excavation and graded areas shall identifying either be relocated or cut and plugged according subsurface to the applicable code requirements utilities and structures, and ensure findings are incorporated in site design m CONSTRUCTION -AESTHETICS CON-17 During construction, a security Contract Review contract During City Planning fence, the height of which shall be determined language and language and construction and Building by the City of Huntington Beach Planning and construction plan construction Dept and Building Department, shall be installed around plan and applicant/ the perimeter of the site The construction site ensure security designated o shall be kept clear of all trash, weeds, etc fence is contractor z installed around °, the perimeter of o the site City of Huntington Beach 1-35 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project cd Huntington Beach k8M*RP Final S CON-18 Construction activities shall be language and language and construction and Building concentrated away from adjacent residential construction plan construction Dept areas,to the extent feasible Equipment storage plan and and soil stockpiling shall be at least 100 feet ensure away from adjacent residential property lines avoidance of adjacent residential areas, to the extent feasible, and equipment storage and soil stockpiling is at least 100 feet from residential property CONSTRUCTION - HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS > Contract Review contract During City Planning CON-19 Prior to excavation of the Contract Review contract Prior to City Public contaminated area and other areas for rough language and language and excavation Works Dept and grading, the project site shall be cleared of construction construction applicant/ � o and other deleterious materials These materials ensure removal contractor excess vegetation,surface trash,piping,debris, plans plans and designated shall be removed and disposed of properly and disposal of (recycled, if possible), excess surface trash, � � City of Huntington Beach 1-38 Augumt2O1O Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report f r k" piping, debris, and other deleterious materials from project site CON-20 Proper excavation procedures Contract Review contract Prior to and City Public shall comply with the Occupational Safety and language and language and during Works Dept. and Health Administration's Safety and Health construction construction excavation applicant/ Standards, If applicable, the SCAQMD Rule plans plans and and designated 1166 permit shall be obtained prior to the ensure remedlation contractor commencement of excavation and remedial compliance with activities Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Safety and En C Health Standards z 0 Review o SCAQMD Rule o 1166 permit(if applicable) City of Huntington Beach 1-37 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Fnl'ror JW t G' CON-21 The contractor shall follow all Remedial Action Review During City Fire recommendations contained within the adopted Plan and Health Remedial construction Dept.and Remedial Action Plan and Health and Safety and Safety Plan Action Plan and applicant/ Plan for the project site Health and designated Safety Plan and contractor ensure recommendatio ns are followed CON-22 A licensed asbestos/lead Contract Review contract Prior to City Planning abatement contractor shall be obtained to language and language and construction and Building remediate the asbestos-containing materials and construction construction and Dept., Fire Dept , lead-based paint on site prior to construction plans plans asbestos/lead and applicant/ The contractor shall contact the SCAQMD and Coordinate with paint removal designated the City of Huntington Beach Departments of SCAQMD and contractor Planning, Building and Safety, and Fire prior to the fire asbestos/lead paint removal department CON-23 If any hazardous materials not Contract Review contract During City Fire Dept , previously addressed in the mitigation measures language and language and construction Public Works CD W contained herein are identified and/or released construction construction Dept., and 0 to the environment at any point during the site plans plans and applicant/ cleanup process, operations in that area shall ensure designated cease immediately At the earliest possible time, cleanup/constru contractor the contractor shall notify the City of Huntington ction is ceased Beach Fire Department of any such findings if hazardous Upon notification of the appropriate agencies, a materials are course of action would be determined subject to identified the approval of the City of Huntington Beach and/or City of Huntington Beach 1-38 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report at. ,,� � 6 ra',- � y.�. er «,�` / � N � � � r�tl r 'ti„^ /r' {! n �"a32 *''• Public Works Department and Fire Department released Notify City fire department CON-24 All structures must be cleaned Contract Review contract During City Fire Dept , of hazardous materials prior to off-site language and language and construction Public Works transportation or hauled off site as a waste in construction construction Dept , and accordance with applicable regulations plans plans and applicant/ ensure designated structures of contractor hazardous materials are cleaned prior to y off-site transportation CON-25 Structure removal operations Contract Review contract During City Planning shall comply with all regulations and standards language and language and construction and Building of the SCAQMD construction construction Dept and z 0 plans plans and applicant/ o ensure designated o compliance with contractor W regulations and standards of SCAQMD for City of Huntington Beach 1-39 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach K8K8RP Final S Will, structure removal CON-26 The contractor shall post signs Clean up/remediat Review public Prior to and City Planning prior to commencing remediation, alerting the ion signage notice of site during and Building public to the site cleanup operations in progress cleanup remediation Dept , Public The City of Huntington Beach Planning and Works Dept , Building Department and Public Works and applicant/ Department shall review and approve the size, designated wording, and placement of these signs contractor CON-27 Unrecorded or unknown wells Contract Review contract During City Fire Dept , uncovered during the excavation or grading language and language and excavation/gra DOGGR, and process shall be immediately reported to and construction/gradi construction ding applicant/ coordinated with the City of Huntington Beach ng plans plans designated Fire Department and state Division of Oil, Gas, contractor Drn and Geothermal Resources, and shall meet City Report of Huntington Beach Specification 422 unrecorded or unknown wells uncovered during the excavation or grading process � o _ � � City of Huntington Beach 1'40 Auguat2O1U Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report �ti �t " a tv �, Ski e i�"i ��lr �s"M{ �t'�n'"�r 3` M RM�y {a �S �Sv'ka" N 9'•, 4 5 ���ik � � '.n T{A � � .( CON-28 During remediation, if any soil Contract Review contract During City Public was found to be hazardous due to contamination language and language and remediation Works Dept and other than petroleum hydrocarbons, it would be construction/ construction applicant/ segregated, stockpiled, and handled separately remediation plans plans designated after issuance of a stockpiling permit by the City contractor of Huntington Beach Public Works Department Segregate and stockpile any soil deemed hazardous CON-29 Dust and volatile organic Contract Review contract Prior to City Public emissions from excavation activities shall be language and language and construction Works Dept and controlled through water spray or by employing construction construction and applicant/ other approved vapor suppressants, including plans plans and excavation designated hydromulch spray, in accordance with Regional ensure control contractor Water Quality Control Board Waste Discharge of dust and Requirements and the SCAQMD permit VOC emissions conditions CON-30 Prior to the excavation process Contract Review contract Prior to City Public for pipeline construction, the contractor shall language and language and construction Works Dept and coordinate with the Orange County Integrated construction construction and applicant/ Waste Management Department in order to plans plans excavation designated o ensure that proposed pipeline construction does contractor o not impact drainage of the former Cannery Coordinate with o Street Landfill, the Orange W County Integrated Waste City of Huntington Beach 1-41 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report it I a zli 2 ., ,yam r y y ^.tf y z ✓/ v' r,i . ' �, ss.r�s d/ti,,t„r Y g.a; `'^ r'` 'rx:. °'- rametat Management Department to ensure proposed pipeline construction does not impact drainage of the former Cannery Street Landfill CON-31 Methane migration features Methane Review and Prior to City Fire Dept , would be consistent with the requirements of the migration features confirm construction Orange County City of Huntington Beach Specification Number report approval of Health Care 429 and other applicable state and federal methane Agency, regulations The methane migration features migration Environmental 9- shall be submitted for review and approval to the features report Health Division, Orange County Health Care Agency, and applicant Environmental Health Division and the City of Huntington Beach Fire Department 0 CON-32 Studies to evaluate the potential Studies to Review studies Prior to City Public o for landfill gas generation and migration would evaluate the to evaluate the construction Works Dept, and o be completed prior to implementation of the potential for potential for Fire Dept in proposed water delivery component of the landfill gas landfill gas coordination with W project Appropriate mitigation measures would generation and generation and SCAQMD, Solid be coordinated with the SCAQMD, Solid Waste migration migration Waste Local Local Enforcement Agency, Regional Water I Enforcement City of Huntington Beach 1-42 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report �� " +� a y _ bx,r.h�� �� 6rA �c : w e�� � dr � �� € r 5 �� rY r z/ f r�I , �Y :hf,� r✓. Ys��x,r+ Quality Control Board, and the City of Agency Huntington Beach Fire Department. Mitigation Regional Water measures shall entail active or passive Quality Control extraction of landfill gas to control surface and Board, and off-site migration and passive barriers with vent applicant layers and alarm systems below trenches and within 1,000 feet of the former Cannery Street Landfill boundary A comprehensive monitoring network would be established along the pipeline alignment adjacent to the landfill Periodic monitoring of the monitoring network would be performed CON-33 Closure reports or other Closure reports Review closure Prior to City Fire Dept acceptable documentation shall be reviewed and and reports to issuance of and applicant r� approved by the Huntington Beach Fire documentation document the grading Department to document the successful successful permits completion of required remediation activities, if completion of any, for contaminated soils, in accordance with required soilCD City Specification 431-92 The remediation reports/documentation shall be submitted and activities approved by the Huntington Beach Fire o Department prior to the issuance of grading N permits for site development No construction shall occur in the affected area until reports have W been accepted by the City CONSTRUCTION -TRAFFIC City of Huntington Beach 1-43 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Reportti//yyitirin Nisurh ,�,, �,y: �� r� 's� •��`,, � ^v F �z�"<<,. fl �/6 r �,�a ',� i"„ CON-34 Prior to construction, a traffic Traffic Review and Prior to Affected management plan (TMP) shall be prepared and management plan confirm construction jurisdiction's implemented to the satisfaction of the affected implementation traffic staff and jurisdiction within which the facilities are to be of traffic applicant/design constructed where construction would affect management ated contractor roadways The affected jurisdiction shall review plan and approve the TMP prior to construction to ensure that congestion and delay of traffic resulting from project construction is not substantially increased and will be of a short- term nature To ensure that congestion and delay of traffic resulting from project construction is not substantially increased, the TMP shall include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Limit construction to one side of the road or out of the roadbed where a possibleCD CD • Provide of continued access to commercial and residential properties adjacent to construction sites o • Provide alternate bicycle routes and o pedestrian paths that comply with the American with Disability Act W Accessibility Guidelines, where existing paths/routes are disrupted b City of Huntington Beach 1-44 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Igo t, ,.ffll construction activities, if any • Submit a truck routing plan for approval by the City of Huntington Beach, Orange County, and other responsible public agencies in order to minimize impacts from truck traffic during material delivery and disposal • Where construction is proposed for two-lane roadways, confine construction to one-half of the pavement width Establish one lane of traffic on the other half of the roadway using appropriate construction signage and flagmen,or submit a detour plan for approval by the City Traffic Engineer > • The traffic management plan shall specifically address the proposed o. Ascon landfill remediation activities a 0 and provide measures to ensure that Z=$ the timing and frequency of truck 0 traffic entering and exiting the landfill, in conjunction with project construction, will not result in substantial delays, or circulation conflicts Measures may include I I City of Huntington Beach 1-45 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report File 01 mI staggering of work hours/construction days, use of flag personnel, alternate routes,or other measures capable of avoiding or reducing traffic congestion • Affected agencies shall approve the traffic management olan at least two weeks prior to construction Per California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) requirements, the applicant shall submit the traffic management plan to Caltrans at the 90%design phase • Construction activities shall, to the X extent feasible, be coordinated with other construction activity taking y place in the affected area(s) CD • Provide for temporary parking,where ° necessary, during installation of pipelines within the AES site z • On- and off-site traffic signing and ° striping shall be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project • Ensure that access will be maintained to individual properties and City of Huntington Beach 1-46 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report rf�n>e M9/9 businesses, and that emergency access will not be restricted The contractor shall coordinate in advance with local jurisdictions to avoid restricting movements of emergency vehicles Jurisdictions shall notify police departments, fire departments, ambulance services, and paramedic services in advance of the proposed locations, nature, timing, and duration of construction activities and shall advise of access restrictions that could impact their effectiveness At locations where access to nearby property is blocked, provision shall be ready at all times to accommodate emergency vehicles, such as plating over excavations, CD short detours, and alternate routes in conjunction with local agencies 0 CON-35 Prior to initiating the removal of Contract Review contract Prior to City Public z structures and contaminated materials, the language and language or removal of Works Dept. and contractor must provide evidence that the traffic control plan evidence that structures/cont applicant/ removal of materials would be subject to a traffic the removal Of aminated designated control plan, for review and approval by the City materials would materials contractor of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, be subject to The intent of this measure is to minimize the traffic control City of Huntington Beach 1-47 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report trc�13,YTI a' Asa "K time period and disruption of heavy-duty trucks plan CON-36 Construction-related activities Contract Review contract During Affected would be subject to, and comply with, standard language and language and construction jurisdiction's street use requirements imposed by the City of traffic control plan traffic control traffic staff and Huntington Beach, Orange County, and other plan and applicant/ public agencies, including the use of flagmen to ensure designated assist with haul truck ingress and egress of compliance with contractor construction areas and limiting the large size City, Orange vehicles to off-peak commute traffic periods County, and other public agencies' street use requirements CON-37 The contractor shall obtain the Right-of-way Review right-of- Prior to Affected necessary right-of-way encroachment permits encroachment way construction jurisdiction's and satisfy permit requirements prior to any permits encroachment Public Works CD construction Nighttime construction may be permits and staff and performed in congested areas Also, nighttime approval of applicant/ construction activities shall have prior approval nighttime designated Z0 t_J by the City of Huntington Beach Public Works construction contractor Department and other affected agencies activities City of Huntington Beach 1-48 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report it at t ;t Q !p��;r► tr ql It° L1 Is 1``gt a f .i,i ,sf'" ��'t ,�� ,,`;�"< „nj� '`ti � s,,,a` ,a� F 3 ��� �%° , G � '�i\ ; � s� I• `i CON-38 During periods of heavy Contract Review contract Du ing Affected equipment access or truck hauling, the language specifications construction jurisdiction's contractor would provide construction traffic to ensure traffic staff and signage and a construction traffic flagman to provision of applicant/design control construction and general project traffic at construction ated contractor points of ingress and egress and along traffic signage roadways that require a lane closure and flagman CON-39 The applicant shall coordinate Truck and Review truck Prior to City Public with the Public Works Department, Traffic construction and issuance of Works Dept. and Engineering Division in developing a truck and vehicle routing construction grading applicant construction vehicle routing plan prior to plan vehicle routing permits issuance of grading permits This plan shall plan include the approximate number of truck trips and the proposed truck haul routes It shall rn specify the hours in which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction related impacts to adjacent residents and the surrounding area The plan shall take intoCD consideration any street improvement construction occurring in the vicinity. These 0 plans must be submitted for approval to the oz Public Works Department N CONSTRUCTION - BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES CON-40 The willow scrub vegetation on Construction Review Prior to and City Planning the OC-44 pump station site (primary site) documents construction during and Building provides suitable nesting and foraging habitat for documents and construction Dept., Public the least Bell's vireo Vireo bellu bel6i . The confirm Works Dept, and City of Huntington Beach 1-49 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project cd Huntington Beach yNK8Rp Final Subsequent RM applicant shall demonstrate in its construction construction applicant/ documents that construction activities do not activities do not qualified directly affect the willow scrub vegetation. directly affect biologist Further, if construction is to occur during the the willow scrub breeding season for least Bell's vireo (March 1 vegetation through September 15),focused surveys for this species are recommended in order to determine Confirm this species presence or absence from the focused project site prior to any construction activities If surveys for this the species is detected, and if construction species are occurs during the breeding season within 500 conducted if feet of active nest sites, construction noise shall construction is be limited to 60 decibels adjusted at the nest to occur during location the breeding season for least Bell's vireo (March 1 through orl CD Cn CON-41 To avoid impacts on nesting Contract Review Prior to and City Planning 0 birds (including the least Bell's vireo), language and construction during and Building z construction activities for the OC-44 booster construction schedule, construction Dept , Public pump station site or optional sites (whichever is schedule preconstruction Works Dept selected) should be conducted between survey(s), and and September 16 and March 14 If construction monitoring applicant/qualifie occurs inside the peak nesting season(between reports d biologist City of Huntington Beach 1-50 August 2010 � 9 � Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach &888RP Final S bo nt EnvironmentalI Report conducted prior to construction activities by a qualified biologist to identify any active nesting locations If the biologist does not find any active nests within the project site, the construction would be allowed to proceed. If the biologist finds an active nest within the project site and determines that the nest may be impacted, the biologist would delineate an appropriate buffer zone around the nest;the size of the buffer zone would depend on the affected species and the type of construction activity. Any active nests observed during the survey would be mapped on an aerial photograph Only construction activities (if any)that have been approved by a biological monitor would take place within the buffer zone until the nest is vacated The biologist shall survey (or possibly multiple surveys) will be serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities shall occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests shall occur Results of the preconstruction survey and any subsequent monitoring shall be provided to the California Department of Fish and Game and any other appropriate CEQA lead and responsible agencies � o � � � City of Huntington Beach 1-51 Auguot2O1O Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach yNK8RP Final Subsequent E vY ntm| Impact Report CON-42 Suitable habitat for the coastal Contract Review Prior to and City Planning California gnatcatcher (Polloptlla callfomlca) is language and construction during and Building present within the coastal sage scrub vegetation construction documents and construction Dept , Public that occurs immediately east of the primary site documents preconstruction Works Dept for the OC-44 pump station Additionally, survey(s), as and applicant gnatcatchers were observed in this area during necessary the bio ogical survey, The applicant shall demonsirate in its construction documents that occupied coastal sage scrub vegetation is not directly affected by construction activities Further, if construction activities take place during the breeding season for this species (between February 15 and August 30 for areas within the Natural Community Conservation Plan), a preconstruction survey is recommended in order-o determine the presence or absence of this species from the project site If this species is found to occur on the project site, and if 017a CD construction occurs during the breeding season 0 within 500 feet of active nest sites, construction noise shall be limited to 60 decibels adjusted at z the nest location CON-43 A survey for active raptor nests Survey and Review survey Prior to and City Planning by a qualified biologist would be required on the construction results and during and Building ON proposed OC-44 booster pump station site prior plans construction construction Dept, Public to any habitat disturbance during the breeding plans Works Dept and season lgenerally between February 1 and June applicant/ City of Huntington Beach 1-52 Auguut2U10 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report F 'Pis. ..... 30). Any occupied nests found during survey qualified efforts would be mapped on construction plans. biologist Restrictions on construction activities may be required in the vicinity of the nest until the nest is no longer active as determined by a qualified biologist In many circumstances, a 300-to 500- foot buffer zone is designated around an active nest to minimize disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer in use for the season, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. CON-44 The project applicant shall Horizontal Review Prior to City Public prepare a horizontal directional drill contingency directional drill horizontal construction Works Dept, and plan prior to each major bore to address contingency plan directional drill and each applicant procedures for containing an inadvertent release (Frac-Out contingency major bore of drilling fluid (frac-out) The plan shall contain Contingency plan and specific measures for monitoring frac-outs, Plan) conform to containing drilling mud, and notifying agency approved plan personnel The City Engineer and appropriate resource agencies shall review the site-specific 0 Frac-Out Contingency Plan prior to each mayor =1 0 0 bore, and during construction the project Z applicant shall implement the measures identified in the plan CON-45 In order to minimize potential Preconstruction Review Prior to City Planning construction impacts to nesting savannah nesting survey for preconstruction construction and Building sparrows(Passerculus sandwichensis)near the savannah survey report Dept. and proposed desalination facility, a qualified sparrows I applicant/ I I City of Huntington Beach 1-53 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report �Io%� m biologist will perform a preconstruction nesting Ensure qualified survey in consultation with applicable regulatory adequate biologist agencies Should nesting savannah sparrows be mitigation is found, adequate mitigation (e g , relocation, implemented, construction noise abatement measures, etc) as necessary would be implemented as appropriate based on the findings of the preconstruction survey CON-46 Focused surveys for sensitive Focused surveys Review of Prior to City Planning biological resources performed prior to proposed for sensitive focused survey construction and Building project implementation shall include a review of species, including results Dept and data within the Californa Natural Diversity review of applicant/ Database to obtain currert information on any California Natural qualified previously reported sensitive species/habitat, Diversity biologist including Significant Natural Areas identified Database under Chapter 12 of the Fsh and Game Code CON-47 Construct on activities would be Contract Review contract Prior to and City Planning limited to a well-defined area Prior to grading language and language and during grading and Building CD and construction activities, a qualified biologist construction plan construction and Dept and shall fence or stake the limits of disturbance plan construction applicant/ qualified Confirmation biologist that fencing/staking occurs City of Huntington Beach 1-54 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project sd Huntington Beach PNyNRP Final S bs Environmental I CON-48 A qualified biologist shall Contract City Planning monitor construction activities to ensure that no language and language and construction and Building inadvertent impacts on biological resources construction plan construction Dept and occur plan applicant/ qualified Confirmation of biologist qualified monitor CONSTRUCTION - CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES CON-49 Should buried Contract Review contract During City Planning historical/archaeological resources be language and language and excavation and Building discovered during excavation on the OC-44 construction plan construction Dept., Public proposed booster pump station site, all plan Works Dept. and construction work in that area shall be halted or applicant/ > diverted until a qualified archaeologist can designated Ur evaluate the nature and significance of the finds archaeologist, as Q necessary z 0 below ground surface or lower on the proposed resource recovery paleontological excavation and Building OC-44 booster pump station site, a program resource Dept , Public CON-50 During excavation of 5 feet Paleontological Review During City Planning paleontological resource recovery program for recovery Works Dept and Miocene invertebrate fossils shall be program applicant/ implemented.This program shall include,but not designated City of Huntington Beach 1-55 August 2010 � Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report be limited to, the following paleontologic • Monitoring by a qualified monitor paleontologic monitor of excavation in areas identified as likely to contain paleontologic resources The monitor shall be equipped to salvage fossils as they are unearthed to avoid construction delays and to remove samples of sediments, which are likely to contain the remains of small fossil invertebrates and vertebrates The monitor must be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens Monitoring may be reduced if the potentially fossiliferous units described herein are not encountered, or .upon exposure are determined following examination by qualified paleontologic personnel to have low potential to contain fossil z resources ° N • Preparation of recovered specimens o to a point of identification and W permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates City of Huntington Beach 1-56 August 2010 Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach K8KHRP Final S ba Environmental I specimens into a museum repository with permanent retrievable storage. The paleontologist should have a written repository agreement in hand prior to the initiation of mitigation activities • Preparation of a report of findings with appended itemized inventory of specimens.The report and inventory, when submitted to the appropriate lead agency, would signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to paleontologic resources CON-51 A qualified paleontologist shall Contract Review contract During City Planning be retained to monitor grading operations at the language and language and construction and Building • Identification and curation of proposed desalination facility site and, if grading/constructi grading/constru grading Dept and necessary, to salvage scientifically significant on plan ction plan applicant/ fossil remains The paleontologist shall have the designated Z authority to temporarily divert or direct grading paleontologist 0 efforts to allow evaluation and salvage of exposed fossils CON-52 While it is not anticipated, in the case Contract Review contract During City Planning that human remains are found within the OC-44 language and language and construction and Building booster pump station site,no further excavation or construction plan construction Dept , Public City of Huntington Beach 1-57 August 2010 9 � Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach MMRP Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report NI[tl I1 OU'l r 3 f '' t�iD E3 14 G t C1 111, ,` A � � ��.� „f "Fti 1" e � o s a y� e„4 «�S`rd.. §�g" i' &� , ' a 't« ', r?'� 1 �..F✓^rr z> ✓x„ir i disturbance of the site or any nearby area plan Works Dept and reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains applicant shall occur until the County coroner has determined,within two working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains The County coroner shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery If the County coroner determines that the remains are or are believed to be Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento must be notified within 24 hours In accordance with California Public Resources Code, Section 5097 98, the Native American Heritage Commission must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American 9 The descendents shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the Q site The designated Native American representative would then determine, in o consultation with the property owner, the N disposition of the human remains 0 W City of Huntington Beach 1-58 August 2010 Res. No. 2010-63 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven, that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on September 7, 2010 by the following vote AYES: Carchio, Coerper, Green, Bohr, Dwyer, Hansen NOES: Hardy ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None y Clerk and ex-offic Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTACHMENT #2 Final SEIR No. 10-001 , Technical Appendices, Responses To Comments, and Errata Are available for review in the Department of Planning-and Building and the City Clerk's Office 2000 Main St., Huntington Beach Or online at http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/Government/Departments/Pla nninq/major/poseidon.cfm Item `L. - Page 72 -128- ATTACHMENT #3 %1-3 ORANGE COUNTY 2 Park Plaza, Suite 1001 Irvine, California 92614-6904 BUSMSS COUNCIL phone:949 794.22421 fax 949 476 0443 1 www.ocbc.org June 7, 2010 The Honorable Cathy Green Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: DSEIR for Poseidon Resources Seawater Desalination Facility -SUPPORT Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members. The Orange County Business Council is a longtime supporter of infrastructure projects that will improve Orange County and enhance-our business climate and economy. The Poseidon Resources Seawater Desalination Facility in Huntington Beach is a perfect example of how public-private partnerships can work and move Orange County forward. Water is too often taken for granted and is in fact a crucial infrastructure element that is considered by businesses interested in moving to or expanding in Orange County. Today more than 50 percent of Orange County's water supply comes from imported sources. When you combine the drought we're-experiencing with the environmental and agricultural constraints that further limit the reliability of our imported water supply, a local, drought- proof, high-quality water supply is essential for the infrastructure certainty that makes Orange County attractive to the business community. I encourage you and the City Council to certify the DSEIR and allow this project to move forward. Sincerely, Lucy Dunn President Orange County Business Council cc, Mayor Pro Tem ,fill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen SHAPING ORANGE COUNTYS ECONOMIC FUTURE Item 4. - Page 74 -130- Lugar, Robin From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8 58 AM ro• CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject. Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#5566 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Dave Guido Description: Dear City Council. I urge you to read this memo regarding the Poseidon project in Oceanside. I'd ask you to change the name of the city on the top of this memo from Oceanside to Huntington Beach and suggest that this is what the memo will look like that will be coming to you in a couple of years. This project is flawed in many ways. There is a future in desalinationjust not this one. Dave Guido Expected Close Date: 06/22/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. 1 -131- Item 40 o Page 75 City of Oceanside MEMORANDUM DATE: June 17, 2010 TO: Honorable Mayor and-City Councilmembers FROM: Peter A. Weiss, City Manager �p SUBJECT: Poseidon Water Purchase Agreereient In 2007, the City of Oceanside entered into a Water Purchase Agreement(WPA)with- Poseidon Resources, to purchase desalinated ocean water. Besides the City of Oceanside, eight other agencies also entered into WPAs to purchase the water produced by Poseidon. Since that time, the Desal Partners Committee has been negotiating with Poseidon on various points related to the final cost and other points in the agreement. In the last few months it has become apparent that Poseidon's cost of water is going to be greater than originally proposed. To make the project viable, Poseidon needs subsidies from the San Diego County Water Authority(CWA)and Metropolitan Water District(MWD). The various agencies, including Oceanside, entered into agreements with MWD for a $250 per acre foot subsidy that would go to Poseidon to help offset capital costs. One of the conditions of the subsidy from MWD is that if the CWA should challenge their rate structure then MWD would cancel the subsidy. Last week CWA filed a law suit challenging the way MWD sets its rates and charges. The Desal Partners asked the CWA to backstop the MWD subsidy should MWD withdraw it. CWA estimates it would cost 25 million per year and raise CWA rates over $50 per acre foot to subsidize Poseidon, making the project even more costly. In discussions with CWA it is apparent the Poseidon project is not going to work as originally structured. CWA has indicated that they would be willing to negotiate with Poseidon to take over the protect if the Desal Partners agreed. If CWA were to pursue negotiations and be successful, it would require all Desal Partners to cancel their existing WPAs. At this time it appears that the only option for the region to receive 56,000 acre feet of desalinated ocean water is to have CWA take over the project and make the water available to all agencies within its system. Item 4. a Page 76 - 132- The San Diego County Water Authority General Manager has asked for a unified action from the Desal Partners in support of the San Diego County Water Authority directly negotiating a Water Purchase Agreement with Poseidon Resources, no later than'Thursday, June 24, 2010. This item will be on the Council's June 23, 2010 agenda. Staff is recommending the Council support the County Water Authority in negotiating with Poseidon to develop a cost effective plan for the desal plant. -133- Item 4e m Page 77 Charles H. Bunten 380 5th Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 June 7, 2010 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Honorable Council Members. I support the Poseidon Desalination plant and water treatment facility and I wish that you will as well when the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report comes before you for consideration. I understand that there are always risks involved in attempting anything new, but those identified with this project are negligible. Considering our long term water needs, the Poseidon project is of greater importance than any major project Huntington Beach has seen in recent memory. Huntington Beach is very special to Margie and me. We have made this our home town for the past thirty-five years because of the countless blessings the community offers. As Chamber of Commerce board member and former chairman, I recognize the importance to our residents and businesses of a sustainable water supply. Simply stated, if we do not have dean water for drinking, no other quality-of-life issue will matter. I hope you will approve the SEIR when you have the opportunity. Yours truly, ��� r I'ED Charlie Bunten J N 112010 Huntington Beach CITY COUNCIL OFFICE • Item 4. - Page 78 -134- 06/20/2010 11:36 71496455088 ILANGTON PAGE 01 Innis T.S gFnn o t 6[i7ld Ave I4nn►ington Bunch,CA 92646 "fit+°,� T� °Ge+�t+9'da �+ �$a�. s� �► o�Ao'� 9 AAA of soeAW-pa4fe-4 0 P -135- Item 4. a Page 79 Page 1 of 1 Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com) Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 10 34 AM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#435 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on Agenda Items Citizen name: John Earl Description: From John Earl [mailto•admin@ocvoice com] Sent Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5 04 PM To• 'John Earl' Subject- Desal-Debacle. Can Huntington Beach Become Tampa Bay? What if Poseidon fails here too? Desal Debacle Can Huntington Beach Become Tampa Bay9 What if Poseidon fails again? Part 2 of a series of articles on desalination From the OC Voice www.ocvoice wordpress.com No matter if Poseidon fails in Huntington Beach, Bohr said,because the burden will be strictly Poseidon's. "We're not hiring Poseidon, so there's no risk,"he told hundreds of people packed tightly into the city council chambers "If it fails, it doesn't cost us anything." But the Huntington Beach City Council majority defended Poseidon and blamed government interference for the failure The Tampa Bay Water Authority (TBWA) "blew it," Hansen said, by assuming the risk of the project "well before the operation was turnkey " *What would happen if Poseidon failed in Huntington Beach like it did in Tampa Bay, Florida? *Who would pay for it? *What actually happened in Tampa9 Read the full article online http //ocvoice wordpress com/2009/03/18/desal- debac le-can-huntington-beach-become-tampa-bay-what-if-poseidon-fails-again/ Expected Close Date: 03/20/2009 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored Item 4. - Page 80 -136- Page 1 of I Ramos, Ricky From: Milt Dardis [mdardis@venzon net] Sent- Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7 33 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Cc: mdardis@venzon net Subject: San Diego water-rate lawsuit threatens desalination subsidy Part II Mr. Ramos: As the following indicates, the San Diego County Water Authority has approved a suit against the MWD over Costs per Water This suit-will affect the subsidy that Poseidon Resources needs in order to sell their water at a Profit As you do your Due Diligence on the HB Poseidon Resources Project, this is needed information as it affects the Cost of Manufactured Water You must remember, Poseidon Resources has never built a Water Desalination Plant. Poseidon Resources is nothing more than promoters who will leave the city with our money and an incomplete plant, open trenches in our streets unless you and the City of Huntington Beach place measures of control and fiscal responsibility on the Project. Completion and Performance Bonds along with a cross corporate guarantee from the Principal will offer protection to the citizens of Huntington Beach You have a fiduciary responsibility to do this. Please review the following as it does jeopardize the building of the Carlsbad Project by Poseidon Resources. Milt Dardis Huntington Beach Ca San Diego water-rate lawsuit threatens desalination subsidy The San Diego County Water Authority(SDCWA)board of directors on 10 June 2010 unanimously approved taking the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) of Southern California to court over the 2011 and 2012 water rates MWD adopted in April The board also authorized seeking a stay on the lawsuit so the two agencies can try to resolve the rate dispute through negotiations The lawsuit puts in jeopardy the subsidy of up to US$ 250 per acre-foot(US$ 0.20/m3) of water agreed by MWD with Poseidon Resources for its desalination plant at Huntington Beach. SDCWA is looking at replacing the subsidy from its own resources It would be used to enable other agencies to buy water from the plant SDCWA alleges that MWD's rate structure disguises the true price of imported water and impedes cost- efficient water conservation and long-term regional and statewide water supply reliability efforts. By charging an artificially low rate for its water supplies, MWD discourages water conservation and local agency investments in cost-effective water supply projects, says San Diego. 6/18/2010 -137- Item 4. - Page 81 Huntington -n,% a--* f..yf'1.h Y-- RNI = RECEIVED � U \- Dept of Planning �r &Building 'wo (o , a.lie 54 (� - 4- o-� 'tht C 1 `�,l 0-� ��vt4� *vlB.2Ji � �-- - �le-e2 kj ,p (a-I,,+ e-m k s-{�-vc,+4 a vi � v►vi Czu �c` {' CA-q-2-4-4S - - --— - i jj 4ij jj ( y L�+¢ii+6n�J'COunty Fine{W Photogroph)III fi1tIt I1111111111111tt11111$11 JIM]litM 111fiff 111111 PUBLISHED and DISTRIBUTED exclusively by IZAND COM Omine AP Gaileay� Pr niti CaSbm 0 1-a E^try;Se c-at Ic-d co,, i Item 40 - Page 82 -138- Joel aad Jeanne Benson 20091 Crater Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 RECEIVED ? July 2,2010 �L ' 7 2i0 Dept of Planning & Building To Whom It May Concern: We are_10 year residents of Huntington Beach and have never thought the plan for the Poseidon Desalination Plant was a good one. Our three basic reasons are that Poseidon does not have a successful business record from the past with such a plant. Secondly, we DO NOT flunk their process is a good one for use in our area where Huntington Beach is trying to promote tourism emphasizing the ocean. And thirdly,it WILL negatively affect the marine life. With the new-restrictions put forth for the AES Power Plant regarding use of the ocean water for cooling why should a desalination plant be built that would cause the same concerns for the marine life. That makes NO sense We also do not think our streets in Southeast Huntington Beach should be torn up to direct the water elsewhere when we in Huntington Beach won't be the recipients of this water There are other effective sources right in our area of Southern California now that can provide clean water without marine life disturbances and would be FAR MORE cost effective. We DEFINITELY oppose the use of Poseidon and the desalination plant here in Huntington Beach. Sincerely, Joel and Jeanine Benson -139- Item 4. - Page 83 S rA T F CAPITOL u T EZ PC(=t^34:0 [(,]T q�- t ^g+ �g -g aYl y,y t} Sy r-.+>4r�FNftE'VT:.� n;,oAME%TC CAS5814 idJ�alifa nin � S- 6E-i G- OR;=CNIZAT-C;h Sic c5'4US5 ✓ `� 916 44S-203 _c Ctyp,+a SENATOR ai 3fCiA 2+ Sk--U 1 C D TOM HARMAN t, _•��,r 3bJ S�U"r;'OAST Df�fVE B0,1,NG FINA aCF SU TE 240 SENATE MINORITY WHIP ,sU�ANr ,'V)S�A N'E;A CA 9262E F;_,7CNsFT a,FISCAL Pc.41t_sV =A1 rA 71A i�`71 a'95J 45GD 95)4555 THIRTY-FIFTH SENATE DISTRICT BUDGET&FISCAL REVIEW i S(;8 e_JnntviTTEE NU 4 �SEN 4ti TRA JSF'ORTAT ON June 1 q, 2010 The lion Cath\ Green \la}tii JUN l � C'in of Minting ion Beach � � 2000 klain Stieet Dept of Planning Huntington Beach. CA 92648 & Building Deai Nla}or Green and Iuntington Beach Council Membeis I he aN ailabiIitN of clean.reliable w ater is essential for California's-fiiture In Sacramento 1 see the challenges our state faces when it comes to water suppl) reliability Between the environmental restrictions and oui agricultural needs.the a\ailability ofimported xa atei from Noi them California is becoming more challenging It is incumbent upon us in Orange County to develop new, reliable.drought-}goof water supplies that are locally controlled The Huntington Beach Seawatei Desalination FacilaN underwent extensive environmental review at the City in 2005 and now again in '1010 1 in pleased to Iearn that the changes to the way the project will function ha-,e"less than significant" em ironmental impacts according to the scientists that conducted the studies I his desalination facilitti will allow Orange County to be Iess reliant on imported hater and gill provide a new high-quality source of drinking watei I emourage you and }our tellow+council membeis to certify the Draft Subsequent Lnx nonmenial Impact Report(DSEIR) that w ill be before you this summer Sin4eiel�, Tom Harman Senator 3 ii' Disvict State ofCaliiornia cc of Pi o T.m Jill HardN COLIDLilnian Keith Bohr Coumulman Joe Caichio Councilman Gil Coerpei C ouncilimin Dex in Dx�x ei Councilman Don Han-,,en Item 4. - Page 84 -140- 06/15/2010 14 49 FAX 916 319 2167 ASShMBUINEMBER JIM SIC.VA Z002/002 STATE CAPITOL COMMITTEES PO BOX 942649 ��� VICE CKAIR AE SACRATNTO GA 94249 006, (9i6;3I9 2067 rl.-(` ARTS,ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS AX 1?'6)j19 2167 TOURISM AND INTFRNET MEDIA MEMBER DISTRICT OFFICE ear BUDGET �{ BUDGET SUB 13 RESOURCES 1701 1 BEACH GOUT EVARD S rE 570 >¢ ''�1; GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION HUNTIIvGTON BEnCy CA 92647 RULES (7141 845 4966 FAX(7,1)8436J75 JIM SILVA ASSEMELLYMEMBER SIXTY SEVFNTH DISTRICT RECEIVED June 15 2010 JUN 21 20 io 1 he Honorable Cathy Green Debit of Planning �Building Mayer, City oflluntingtonBeach 2000 Main Street Huntington Be ch, CA 92648 Dear'vl or cn The Dral Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(DSFIR) for the Huntington Beach Seawater Drsahnation Facility will soon be before you for ecrtllication According to the sclentifiL analysis, the-revisions to the project will have no significant environmental impact OI ange County needs a new, localry-controlled,high-quality water supply such as the one being propos�.d by Poseidon Resources.This project will produce 50 million gallons of fresh druiking Neater every day, which is enough to serve eight percent of Orange County'S_population The project will be located on the site of the existing AFC power plant and the pipes that draw in and di�chaige the water exist today undei the beach, so there will be no recreational Impact Furthennore, Huntington Beach will benefit economically from this project The city stands to realize approximately$2 million in tax benefits from having this project located in Huntington BeaclT I hope that you will certify tnis DSEIR and I look forward to this pioject coming on line soon Sinceiely, L Jrnr Sri-1 vA Assemblyman. 67`'District c c Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe C'archio Councilman Gil Cooper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen -141- Item 4. m Page 85 STATE.CAPITOL COMMITTEES PO BOX942849 APPROPRIATIONS Qri� � SACRAMENTO,CA 94249-0072 Y9 EDUCATION (91916)319-21 t6zt flan is 1Erg1,ShtTUrP TRANSPORTATION FAX(916)319-2172 1 6 ry� JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT DISTRICT OFFICE 210 BIRCH ST SUITE 202 e sTaTh BREA CA 92821 r (714)672-4734 w N_ FAX(714)672-4737 June 15, 2010 ASSEMBLYMAN,SEVENTY-SECOND NORB DISTRICT � ry The Hon. Cathy Green, Mayor JUN 2 7 ZC)�U City of Huntington Beach Dept Of F/E 2000 Main Street BUrfaJng"n"n9 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green The water crisis that has gripped our-state for much of the last-decade is still very real despite the heavy snowfall we received this winter Wet weather does not fix the problems that exist in-the Delta. Both seismic issues as well as environmental challenges threaten the reliability of imported water from Northern California to Southern California Orange County leaders recognize the need to become more self-reliant by developing local water supplies To that end, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California asked its member agencies to develop a five year supply plan that focused on the development of new water supplies that would reduce the demand for imported water and benefit the-region and the state The Municipal Water District of Orange County identified various water recycling and seawater desalination projects that could provide 106,000 acre-feet of water per year, which is about 15 percent of Orange County's water supply More than half of that annual total is expected to come from Poseidon Resources' Seawater Desalination Facility in Huntington Beach (56,000 acre-feet). The high-quality desalinated product water can be produced in an environmentally- friendly and cost-effective way Additionally, Poseidon has agreed to a green-house- gas reduction plan that will make the project "carbon-neutral" — one of the first major infrastructure projects in our state to voluntarily do so. It is also important to note that the construction of this project will provide the region with more than 2,000 jobs at a time when job-creation is one of our state's top priorities I am supportive of businesses like Poseidon Resources who are willing to use their business acumen and private funding to develop a project that will add not only thousands of jobs, but a new water supply — both of which are in short supply right now in California I fully endorse the Poseidon Resources Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility and encourage you to provide the permit necessary for construction of this needed project to begin as soon as possible Sincere , Chris Norby Assemblymember, District 72 Item 4. - Page 86 Pr-1 42-=cycled Paper cc' HB Mayor Pro Tern Jill Hardy HB City Councilman Keith Bohr HB City Councilman Gil Coerper HB City Councilman Don Hansen HB City Councilman Joe Carchio HB City Councilman Devin Dwyer -143- Item 40 - Page 87 ,AF-01-UF'FICE Com Vil TE-S STATE EDUCATION SPCF+."Ivt E`,i O r.�581, ^v .ICE CHA F TRANSPCR ATrO a ., AND I-01.,S(NG 01STRICT OFFICE 6ss-WAR PLD SUI T E z(,v SENATOR cE c 1 R PVA!1V_{i CA g,-So BUDGFT AND F19-AL RE 909 599 961 BOB HUFF 1ATI-RAL RESOURCES ,-x 909 598 6459 REPUBLICAN CAUCUS CHAIRMAN AND WATER J\E65r`E PUBLIC FAFFTY A SON ATE C "H PF TWENTY-NINTH SENATE DISTRICT e t� Lune 18 2010 13uildt�0pt of Plangn.�rn9 The Hon Cathy Green Max-or City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach. CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members The State of California must embrace public-private partnerships in an effoit to build out needed infiastiuctuie, protect taxpayer dollars and increase the number of good-paying private sector jobs Huntington Beach has the opportunity to give both our local economy and oui local eater suppl} a shot in the aim by approving the Iuntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility Di all Subsequent Em ironmental Impact Report (DS1 IR) The independent scientific research conducted by the city and its expeit consultants sho,,\ that the project is environmentally sensitive and there is no significant envnoninenial Impacts ielated to marine life Orange County .has the opportunity to develop a ne A eater supply to ens)ure that �Nc are not overly reliant on impoited vvatei which is v ulnetable to drou(yht. environmental regulations and agricultural needs Please x ote to ceitit) the DSEtR Respectfully. Bob Iluff Senatoi 29`I' Disti ict Item 4. - Page 88 -144- 3 d Mayor Pro rem Jill Hardy Councilman Kerth Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen Rtem 4. - Page 89 /14 of J 10514 OLNA I UM MIIVII VV/AL i L JLNA I U"IVII IVII VVFIL I L",3 UJ U4 4J P M UO-"I O-LU I U t lL CAPITOL OFFICE COMMITTEES STATE CAPITOL LEGISLATIVE ETHICS ROOM 3082 . �y yy+ CHAIR S TEL(916) NTO CA 95814 alilf �".�6i Statr -matt REVENUE AND TAXATION TEL(916a 651-d033 �ro FAx(916)445-9754 VICE CHAIR DISTRICT OFFICE SENATOR MEMBERPRIA710N5 24031 ELTOROROAD MIMI WALTERS BUSINESS PROFESSIONS AND SUITE 210 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LAGUNA HILLS CA 92653 THIRTY-THIRD SENATE DISTRICT MEMBER TEL(949)457-7333 JUDICIARY d. FAx(949)457 7305 R MEMBER m RECEIVEDJune .S, 2010 JUN 2 1 Dept Of Planning Honorable Mayor Green and Council Members & Building City of Huntington Beach 2000 {Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear ayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members Through an independent scientific analysis, the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility has been shown to be environmentally sensitive and deserving of your approval. The Draft �ubsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR)studies the few changes made to the project since its initial EIR certification in 2006. The science shows that all of the proposed changes result in "less than significant" environmental impacts. It is notable that the project alternatives, such as beach wells, often promoted by opponents to the desalination project would result in a loss of anywhere from 2 4 to 4 6 miles of beachf,ront and would require roads and pipes to get the water from the beach wells to the desalination plant There is no large scale (25 million gallons per day or more) desalination facility in the world that u$es any other seawater intake system other than the open ocean water intake that would be used for this project. This pIrivately funded project would provide thousands of jobs, millions dollars in tax revenue and billions of gallons of drinking water for Orange County residents Please vote to certify, the DSEIR and allow this project to continue moving through the state permitting proce s Sincerely, Lah", —Iulllw*� MIMI'WALTERS State Senator, 33`d District cc Fred Wilson, City Administrator Item 4e - Rage 90 -146- STATE CA?I r OL SACRAME,nO CA A?-49007,01 -M �7`�' DISTRICT OF,ICE JAvOP-OR-E Cr ITER COMMITTEES ;Apl<r'LAZA SUITE 2'5 `r=Cr-,— VETERAIS AFFAIRS RVINI: C.\°?6- Cl-iLCK DL'Vomi BUDGET ip49,003'0h0 ASSrP 1S-V iAN SEVEN rir-'i M r3ISTRt4 T RE"EtIIUE AM TAX AT 10 N E-MAIL ztis,rrn,rEr,ne c�cvce;�'- serr�lycscov iLille 18, 2010 Ju�j Ma)or Cathy Green Dept Bulding c,o C ity c f Huntington 3,.ach 2000 Ma>+1 Street Huntingtc n Beach. CA Q648 Dear Ma or Green and Huntington Beach CitN Council members Watel iti Ile suet for Ca i brnl4l , CC0110n11L Ci12111e Fiotll the businesses that opeiate in oils urban connmunities to t Ic Central ` alley fainl5 that feed the nation and the woild, the aNailabiht\ of a reliable «atei Supp y is ersential for the ttltul c of ouI great state - Hence. with cur state', aLIi ICultur�1 and en,,trot mental need, capturing a gieater percentage of out dwindhi ,-' i npoi let] water supply, it i, Incu lbent upon local COMM Lin Ities in Southern California to deNclop independent reliable %k ti r SUpplICS on tl1CII o\N 11 I For rllanti�ycai6. Orange Count-v ha, been at the f6tefi-ont of that effort kith the cte\(;lopnlent of- the {Jround\ti Ater Reple llihillent Sy"teln and Ilo\N a proposed 5eawatei cle-salillation pIo)ect felt,, de,>ahnation plant can 1, t,-,tde 50 million gallon, of high-duality drinking, \�,atei to -00,ODU ()iange Cpunty residen �. annually and po.,tbh� create mole than ?.00U job,_ pio%id rig, million; of dotlar,,every yeai In t�i\ retenue to the cit} In addition, it i, prikately funded and will be CollStrtict(d at no Cost ti r axpayers Ple,iSe pole to certify th Draft SUbSC(IIICIit Cm nonnientai hllpact Repoit (DSCIR) li,u is bun-oic N Oil I �I11CC1 el�. il<<tX �Ssemblvjnan Chuck DeNfore Seventieth District -147- item 40 - Page 91 STATE CAPITOL COMMITTEES P 0 Box 942849 Appropriations Sacramento,CA 94249 Education (916)319-2069/Fax(916)319-2169 ; [�((�� insurance(Chair) DISTRICT OFFICE fifar Gka ��'g,shtfurr Transportation 2400 E Katella Ave,Ste 640 SELECT COMMITTEE Anaheim,CA 92806 Regional Approaches to (714)939-8469/Fax(714)939-8986 Addressing the State's WEBSITE Water Crisis(Chair) www assembly ca gov/solono JOSE SOLORIO STATE ASSEMBLYMAN SIXTY-NINTH DISTRICT June 15,2010 � De g The Hon Cathy Green $urlf P/, nrn Mayor drt39 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members As you well know, a new environmental review was conducted to analyze the environmental impacts of changes in the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility project since the initial environmental analysis was completed in 2005 It is encouraging that the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) for the facility 1s now available for public review and comment, and the process is moving forward with careful consideration It is my understanding that the DSEIR did not detect any significant additional environmental impacts from the changes Therefoie, I encourage you to allow this project to move forward to the state regulatory agencies that must review it The construction of this project will bring more than 2,100 good-paying jobs to Orange County Once it is online,this project will provide Orange County with an entirely new,locally controlled and drought-proof source of drinking water, and lower the county's dependence on imported water from Northern California and the Colorado River We need the watei and we need the jobs I hope you will certify the DSEIR and keep this significant and innovative project moving forward. Sincerely, Jose Solorio State Assemblyman cc Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devm Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen Item 4. - Page 92 -148- NOW,E JEFF MILL ,� � June 14,2a,I0 De pt Of�UIIq�t�n�fg Me I It,,1 G tha (,Imn ;tla w t ill of Huntington Beach now Main horeet Huntington Be,,ch CA 9z(,tS Not Ninui Green aml IlunrInpon Beach Courwrl hlembels "fi:-, is ur"( tl�,of drought, t al,forina dodged I bullet this N edi thanks to oui El o nIo un,rw w S It plouded an `vend EtaiE A goal) lnd know, %V,2 kv,.d rmt he so t ulminte velV�cai 'Ind we Elul t develop tlieitiattr it-,ouieCl,�1e t,ei d I Kali% to pit,reut tis ttaturC diought.,thal me(tI lain to occur t=JI1Ip€3wri€'I4t d iesnubonq aad «WILuliural nests ewilinue to hnalt the fnnount of Soutlit in C<atttt,I It"I rec(-,yes from Me W,iter Pioc jcct (,io"wg pop lratgon In other "Mein �,taos is luith(-t l u)dnl;,om aLaSS to Imported water troa,i Ihr Colorado Rn eI Q Ae ni rnQ Orange Counts°needs<a new loe=-controlled r gat?r-amply `11c f luntrnglon Beach Sea, ani Desahna wn Fanhy rs not a Wer bullet that Will accommodate all of our w at,^r ne db,but It w an Important Ialeco of the puzzle It cell PION Idea Rio tridl,on gallons of drinking avatei to Or,,nge (0,W) of er) da4 — Ihat s erght y i c,e rit of Orange County s Wei needs 1 he lb art 3tt Qw-nemal Rnvaournehtal Impact Report (1 SFJR)sboW,3 there aiv Ito significant en,anonvitntal vnpy ty Innn the opetatt v of the dembnatlan plant I encoulu e 4ou to c:eittfx the DSI IR,and help t1w, iinpoatant POW a1,Itea saphh IAA ww step closer to con-nng onim l�zt ,ce, r` 1 l �tad t 5L'Ititi�rll<in iI`' I)3`tr;tt ti`,IAIt Y e'Ftrlt',dWan hVnh IWLI '<) mcO n,an T4 1%b,I•rc, _ ,zit)c linaarl Gd c oej pt I -149- Item 4. a Page 93 STATE CAPITOL COMMITTEES PO BOX 942849 � Cj ACCOUNTABILITY AND SACRAMENTO,CA 942 -0060 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW (916)319-2060 a f. INSURANCE FAX(916)319-216 C g �� �jY � P JUDICIARY DISTRICT OFFICEG7 RULES 13920 CITY CENTER DR,#260 4TA'e JOINTCHINO HILLS,CA 91 09 FISHERIES COMMITTEES f o n FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE 1 FAX (9)9 627.1 ar M1�� JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT � FAX(909)627.1B4 �u a ! CURT HAGMAN SELECT COMMITTEES July 16, IO ASSEMBLYMAN,SWIETH DISTRICT AEROSPACE RENEWABLE ENERGY The Hon.` achy Green RECEIVED Mayor City of Huntington Beach JUN 2 1 2010 2000 Mai Street Huntingt Beach, CA 92648 Dept of irannrng &Buridrng Dear Ma r Green and Huntington Beach Council Members With the tate in serious financial straits yet again, it is essential for elected officials to do everythin within our power to encourage private enterprise,which is the lifeblood of jobs and economi growth. Perhaps t e only crisis that approaches the seriousness of our economic situation is our need for new loca ater supplies. The Poseidon Resources Seawater Desalination Facility addresses both of t se issues This private company will provide Orange County with 50 million gallons of drinks water per day from a new water source—the ocean. At the same time, the construc n of this project will provide Orange County with more than 2,000 good-paying jobs. The Dra Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(DSEIR),which is the independent study to analyze e project's environmental impacts show no significant impacts from any components of the pr ect that have changed since its 2006 EIR. Because is project has been proven to be scientifically sound, economically viable, a job- creator, ax benefit to the City, and a provider of a new water supply, I support the Huntington Beach S water Desalination Facility and encourage you to certify the DSEIR. Si rel s an Curt Hagman 60 s ct e of ifornia cc: or Pro Tern Jill Hardy C uncilman Keith Bohr C uncilman Joe Carchio C uncilman Gil Coerper C uncilman Devin Dwyer uncilman Don Hansen Item 4e a Page 94 -ISO- STATE CAPI e OL �4� CONIMI T TEES GO BOX 942849VICE SACRAMENTO,CA 94249-0068 j/ � ' � oUD,CHAIR (916)319-2068 � � � .�tEMBERY FAX(916)3;9-2168 BANKIN DISTRICT OFFICE 0.16_01.0'il BANKING AND FINANCE GOVERNMENTAL ORGANiZATfOt 1503 SOUTH COAST DRIVE,STE 205COSTA MESA CA 92626(714)668-2100 FAX(714)668-2104 VAN .RAN E-MAIL 1� assemblymember tran @assembly ca gov ASSISTANT REPUBLICAN LEADER ASSEMBLYMAN,SIXTY-EIGHTH DISTRICT RECEIVED June 16, 2010 JUN 21 > t Dept of Planning The Honorable Cathy Green & SUrldrng Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members The California Water Plan Update 2009, which was released on March 30, 2010 recognizes that one of the potential benefits of seawater desalination is that it can provide "increased water supply reliability during drought periods " (DWR 2010c, Volume 2, Resource Management Strategies, Chapter 9, p 9-9) Because the Pacific Ocean is not affected by drought conditions, the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility would add flexibility and reliability in operating California's water system and it would provide Orange County with a locally-controlled drought-proof water supply Orange County would receive 50 million gallons of drinking water, more than 2,000 much needed jobs and millions of dollars annually in tax revenue This project is clearly in the best interest of Orange County residents and should be approved Sincerely, �� man Ti an Assemblyman 681h District State of California cc- Mayor Pro Tern Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen -151- Item 4m - Page 95 k HUNTIR6TON 6EAt11 RECEIVED ® t Dept of Planning &Building The Hon. Cathy Green Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Dear Mayor Green: The focus of our elected officials at the local,state and federal level should be how to create jobs and spur economic activity. The Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility will not only bring thousands of jobs into our city,but it will provide our community with a regular stream of much-needed tax revenue. Not only will the project give the City an ongoing$2 million annual shot in the arm with property tax revenue, but itwill also make Huntington Beach drought-proof. A 10-million gallon water storage tank will protect our city should a crisis or emergency cut off our water supply By going through the environmental review process now shows that Poseidon Resources is dedicated to responsible planning They will use the recycled industrial water used by the AES power plant until 2020 when AES switches to another cooling method. Poseidon would be required to apply for new permits at that time, but instead are going through the environmental review process now The science shows this is a good project with no significant environmental impacts. For the salve of the thousands of jobs this project would create and the tax revenue this project would bring to Huntington Beach,please certify this DSEIR and approve this project so it can go before the State a rgi a oa Commission for final permitting approval. ,allagher Chairman of the Board of Directors Huntington Beach Chamber of Commerce cc: Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen 19691 Beach Blvd,smte 140 • Creating a strong local economy hun5ngton Beach,CA 92648 - Promoting the community (714)536.8888 - Providing networking opportunities (714)980-7654 Fax ° Representing the interests of businesses with government WWW.hbftrrbercom • Political action Item 4. a Page 96 -'152"Xd3 13rN3Sd-1 dH Wd6E :9 o T oa Lo unr BOARD OF DIRECTORS BE71Y H OLSON PH D CHARLEY WILSON SAUNDRA F JACOBS BIL'_LAWSON ROGER FAUBEL JOHN J SCHr,T1 GENERAL I iANiGER - - g ra 3, Santa MaP_9CnZfFtL10 Watem Ms. 1c-C June 21,2010 RECEIVED The Hon- Cathy Green Mayor JU City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Dept of Planning Huntington Beach, CA 92648 & Building Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members RE SUPPORT for certification of the DSEIR for the HB Seawater Desalination Facility Santa Margarita Water District(SMWD) supports development of new water resources in --Orange County such as the proposed seawater desalination facility in Huntington Beach. SMWD is one of more than a dozen water agencies and municipalities throughout Orange County that have signed a Lettei of Intent to purchase a portion of the desalinated seawater to be produced by this water treatment facility As a public water agency, it is prudent and increasingly necessary for SMWD to diversify its water portfolio to avoid over-reliance on any one source of water Imported water, increased water storage, water conservation,water recycling and seawater desalination should all eventually be part of Orange County's water portfolio The Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(DSEIR) shows the project revisions will have no significant environmental impact and therefore it is appropriate for the City to certify the DSEIR Sincerely, 'John Schatz General Manager Santa Margarita Water District cc Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen 26111 Anconio Parkway,Suite A,Las Flores,C a 92688 °Mailing t),ddLess P O Box 7005,Mission Viejo,CA 92690-7005 Web otiwv SMWD coin Customer Service(949)459-6420 °Aditiniisaation(949)459-6600°Operations'949)459-6430 -1 53- Item 40 - Page 97 C-SINC-3 ORANGE COUNTY 2 Park Plaza, Suite 1001 Irvine, California 92614-5904 BUSINESS COUNCIL phone 949 794 2242 1 fax 949 476 0443 I www ocbc org June 7, 2010 kECEIVED The Honorable Cathy Green JUN r 1 2010 Mayor Dept. of Planning City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Building Huntington Beach, CA 92648 +�� ,,- RE: DSEIR for Poseidon Resources Seawater Desalination Facility - SUPPORT Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members The Orange County Business Council is a longtime supporter of infrastructure projects that will improve Orange County and enhance our business climate and economy. The Poseidon Resources Seawater Desalination Facility in Huntington Beach is a perfect example of how public-private partnerships can work and move Orange County forward Water is too often taken for granted and is in fact a crucial infrastructure element that is considered by businesses interested in moving to or expanding in Orange County. Today more than 50 percent of Orange County's water supply comes from imported sources When you combine the drought we're experiencing with the environmental and agricultural constraints that further limit the reliability of our imported water supply, a local, drought- proof, high-quality water supply is essential for the infrastructure certainty that makes Orange County attractive to the business community. I encourage you and the City Councils to certify the DSEIR and allow this project to move forward Sincerely, l � Lucy Dunn President Orange County Business Council cc Mayor Pro Tern Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Dev►n Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen SHAPING ORANGE COUNTYS ECONOMIC FUTURE Item 4. - Page 98 -154- XTax orq - 0(V Orange Ccunty Taxpayers Assmatton m` Orc: ,ird Lek.t"<rest CA<1,63T) The Honorable Cathy Green, Mayor June 15, 2010 City of Huntington Beach ktcelvto 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach CA JUN r Dear Mayor Green. Dept of Planning & Burldmg Others debate the environmental effects of the proposed desalination facility in Huntington Beach OCTax respectfully invites your attention to the project's tax benefits • The facility will pay $1 8 million per year in property tax, which will stay in Huntington Beach and the County to support schools, municipal services, special districts and libraries • It will pay$500,000 per year in sales tax • It will pay$50,000 per year to your city in utility tax(based on the portion of the power it consumes that is not used for pumping water) • The builder will spend$350 million locally for construction, creating 2,000 direct high- wage taxpaying jobs and 275 indirect jobs during that period • Once in operation, it will create 18 full-time jobs in Huntington Beach and 322 indirect jobs • It will be a reliable source of 50 million gallons per day of potable water It will hedge against economic consequences of drought or other possible disruption to our water supply • It will ease the tax burden on the rest of us, yet it will demand little in government services • It will be operated for the benefit of the public by the taxpaying private sector,not by a tax- exempt public agency Private investors and water users accept the risk and pay the bills • The facility will become a mecca for general government and water officials,to whom you may proudly demonstrate the environmental and municipal leadership of Huntington Beach OCTax first testified in support of this project before Mayor Connie Boardman and Honorable Councihnembers in 2003 The project is needed more now than it was then. Please certify the [)raft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) f President, OCTax cc Honorable Counctlmembers Hardy, Bohr, Carchio, Coerper, Dwyer and Hansen -15�- Item 4e - Page 99 ocr(C-C ORANGECCT"„ CF-AM3rr-�=fit04FPCE- RECEIVED 111,4-coe org 2130 E Fourfl,St Ste 160 Fx(77 d]9;3-0273 San+a Ana CA 92705 r 1 Ph(71419534289 JUN r)21 2-�,i June 10,2010 Dept of Planning &Building The Hon Cathy Green Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members Orange County is currently far too reliant on imported water,which continually faces environmental, agricultural and political challenges We must develop our own new water resources to diversify our water supply,_msure ourselves against drought and inoculate ourselves from the growing challenges we face that are beyond our control regarding the availability of imported water Five years ago,this City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)for the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility Because of changes in the landscape,slight revisions to the project are being considered to ensure its long-term viability and success These changes are undergoing another environmental review—a Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report The science of this project is sound and it shows in the DSEIR that none of the proposed changes will result in any significant environmental impacts. In fact,Poseidon Resources was recently named to the 2010 OC Metro Green Team for rts work in protecting environmental.resources I encourage you to certify the DSEIR and support the completion of this needed and wanted new water resource Sincerely, Javier Mier Chairman of the Board of Directors Orange County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce cc Mayor Pro Tern Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carcluo Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dix-ver Councilman Don Hansen Item 40 - Page 100 -156- ReCE1VED BAY AREA 900 LOSANGELES CENTRAL VALLEY L*A 1W* FOUR CORNERS 01 ORANGECOUNTY SAN D1EG0 GOLD COAST Dept of Planning SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA WOMEN#S &Building LEADERSHIP ASSOCIATION Smaller Go%ern ment•Individual Freedom•Responsibility and Accountability June 16, 2010 The Honorable Cathy Green, Mayor Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Members of the Huntington Beach City Council. On behalf of the California Women's Leadership Association (CWLA), please be advised that our organization has gone on record in support of Poseidon's Seawater Desalination Facility in Huntington Beach We recognize the need to diversify our water supply and the ultimate cost effectiveness of this desalination plant and the consideration given to minimal environmental impacts. We support the approval of this project Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 0 � ; ie Vandermost President California Women's Leadership Association Cc Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen California Women's Leadership Association P O Box 60235•Irvine,CA 92602 Phone(949)632-0121•Fax(714)602-6675 -157- stern 4. e Page 101 bent ny. Mr Ldbe[JCL aIUU( UU11-t 11 .r 1-1113 , _U_ cis There's 'Niol Business, 1 s( Like Your Business C realiv ti Strom T xewl Ecav, 111 t I'r aridnt7q /lie C.GrJdrllrrr%rty CHAWEN5-TOMMERCE • 1'r01 NeiW01-?� f, 0ppneunitier Orange Chamber ber of C.rubs wrce a K%rejeaiq T3rdriwss to Govaru.-izent d 3'1 I f:hal�man 1�rSlur ^ C)ruit;c, C r� '7'�,�li(� (-1 l tf) 5 iK-i�li1 ° bay (''14) 7_i� l h%� •u.�vwl lr�tn�;e�hatiibcrunn hilbseixriq liali&al Arfznsr .Tune 7.2010 JUN � � 9 0,10 The Hon_Cathy Green Dopt Of Planning Mayor Bur/ding City of Nuntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington BCaCh,CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington-Beach Council Members The residents and businesses throughout Orange County need a new reliable water source,which the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility will provide The project will diversify Orange County's water supply and this new source is both locally controlled and drought proof, While the desalination project has all of the approvals it needs at the local level to pursue its state permits and begin operations, Poseidon Resnurcec is taking the responsible course of re-engaging at the local level and studying the envnoninental impacts of operating as a stand-alone project f ils now environmental study shows that all new project impacts of the facility operating on a stand-alone basis are"less than significant" Based on these findings,which are gtuund in sound science. I encourage the Huntington Beach City Council to certify the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report and approve this needed project. sinter y Heidi Larkin-Reed President Orange Chamber of Commerce cc Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe;C irchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devm Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen Item 40 - Page 102 -158- Don MacMister JU We MOM too I t2l Pw*Sf MAVmowt Regith,CA OrAS (1141 No-qm Dept 1? 7 2010 May 17, 2010 Dear City Council, I have-studied the local water issues and have spent time learning about the proposed desalination facility in Huntington Beach I support Poseidon's proposed project, including the contents of the Subsequent EIR, which you will soon be considering I hope you will vote to approve their permits and allow this company to provide our area with precious, and much-needed,-water resources Desalination is needed to provide for our water needs. Municipal Water District of Orange County (our member agency at Metropolitan Water District) has been planning for a long time on desalination as one of the "Next steps for Orange County" per their Planning and Operations Committee Report of May2004 The need for desalination projects is further emphasized -by the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Update from July 2004 Water supplies for Orange County during one of the latest update periods of Fiscal Year 2002 fell short of MWDOC's goal of 300,000 acre-feet by 50,000 acre-feet, an unfulfilled need of 16% The IRP states, "Meeting the targets will require the region to produce 159,000 acre-feet of additional local project and/or seawater desalination supply by 2010 and 249,000 acre-feet by 2020 " The Orange County Water District, our area's groundwater management agency, has been a pioneer in the development of desalination technology Their 70- million-gallons-per-day wastewater recycling project, the Groundwater Replenishment System, will utilize the same types of reverse-osmosis filters as are planned for the Huntington Beach desalination facility Desalination has been talked about for decades, has been researched for years, and has been tested thoroughly, and is a viable part of the picture to satisfy our community's water needs The time has come to realize the dream Please support the desalination project for Huntington Beach Yours, Don MacAllister Former Mayor, Huntington Beach -159- stem 4. a Page 103 Peter F.Bastone Hospital y President&Chef Executive Officer Mission .lt J ospit eJ l� - rr ® RECEIVE[) ST.JOSFiPf I sir^4 May 24, 2010 27700 Medical Center Road The Hon Cathy Green Dept of Planning Mission Viejo,CA 92591 Mayor Building Tel 949 365 2248 Fax 949 364 2056 City of Huntington Beach www mission4heaith cam 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green Water is the most basic physical need humans must have to survive Because of the beautiful weather and abundant resources and quality of life we've built for ourselves in Orange County, we have constructed a way of life that is only sustainable if we address our most basic needs, including water reliability Orange County has traditionally been on the leading edge of infrastructure development. When the state claimed it couldn't afford to build the necessary state highway system in South Orange County to accommodate the growing population, we banded together and were able to construct the roads we needed through infrastructure bonds paid back through tolls on those roads When the Orange County Sanitation District was forced to spend millions on a second outfall pipe, they teamed up with the Orange County Water District to develop a state-of-the-art water recycling project called the Groundwater Replenishment System that is one of the most innovative indirect potable reuse projects in the world Now, Orange County has the ability to approve a seawater desalination project that uses existing infrastructure and recycles seawater used once for industrial purposes and turn it into drinking water This type of private innovation for public good should be encouraged and approved by the Huntington Beach City Council As one of the premiere hospitals in Orange County, Mission Hospital understands the need for good infrastructure to ensure the health and safety of our communities Please vote to approve this project. Sincerely, Peter F. Bastone President and Chief Executive Officer cc Mayor Pro Tern Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen A Mirrsiry of the South Orange County's Regional Medical Center Sisters of St Joseph et(?ranee Item 40 - Page 104 -160- nEceiVecl Bill Cuppy SUN 301 Main Street, Suite #112 Of Plann►ng Huntington Beach, CA 92648 g June 8,2010 Dear Cit) Council Desal)t)ated �%atct is hccomu)g a reahti, in Southern C.alifu)nta i cxa, dialk"I co lean that the Carlsbad desalination plant his reccn-ed final approval As an Orange County )cstdcm, ho\xeNcr, thc project's appioval reminded mL that the final pcimits for the Huntington Beach Posc)don Plant hm e,till not been ),.sued l am NN rtttng todai to ask thlt \(Al c\Ped)tc 11111 p)oce ss to brua,1;the \-�titer to Orange Count-' I know that N,ou sill be considc)Lng the SI:IR soon,\,,h)ch will ,Alo i. Po-,eidon Re%ouices to r•tke \,,ater from the ocean I hope you will appiove it Desahnatcd \,,ater nill btung us rcliahlc, clum d)tnkuig gate) It �\lll be droul hi-pi( of In todai,'s dat .trid age, whe)e\xe h it e teemed \unlllh no rain this }em, liaN c. battled m ildtires and the news Speaks of impending-,-,.ttcr rationing, ht wait% .')nce)ch, A Bill Cuppti bcupp\ uvhomc',oc cant Item 4. - Page 105 CrowvL Ctcstom lntports JUN K; 3004 r Ave"e E)a t p of Planning cost o. Mesa, aA Building 9 goo 03 J u vtie}-, 2010 �:ar �-fig couwc:�, As 0,,t,c i2Kow, /e are %vt, a ti, e of ecomome c ap'd ev,,vl rov,,vttiev'taL cr%sis. our areR leas bezv�parti,�.lar�t� kciO hit bUjobtessv.ess, bus�vuesses ctos�v�g, avO foreclo- S A�d to ties trocblivLg scevLar�o our dr_n.l�%v�,g ��ater GYLSLs �iv+,d%v�g v,ew sources �� cYLtl.CRI. Poseww, hopiv%,a to bvU0 R seaw.Ler treRtlM.eAt ptcfvLt �o. soutVC St t-rP�, v,:r� r,.ose co nA.-j home T6ieir?roject WIC provide taxes to the (,itU, water to the c�tu avw( the evvt�re Couvttd, RKA sr)vu.e jobs. `-Vat's whd t av,t "re;iV L3 thou to approve the sj.()Jsec[uevUt C-IR for the ►-�Rot�vugtow geack C:esc(UvLat'ovti project as soot", as posslblt_ T:tRvvi UCu To, �okl ;ovxSbAyatf on TEri Item 4. - Page 106 -162- RECEIVED To Santa Ana Regional Water QualitN Control Board Public Hearing JUN 21 2010 r)ept of Planning From Km, Westwell & Building Subject: Approval of proposed Water Treatment Facihtt in Huntington Beach (Poseidon Project) 6/10/10 Dear ]Huntington City Council, l support the approval of the SEIR for the desalination plant in Huntington Beach I request Nou to support the approval of the Poseidon SE I Thank you Kris Westwell 17171 Englewood Cr HRCA 92647 -163- Item 4. - Page 107 RECEIVED JU 21 2u j 10 Dept of Planning June 10, 2010 & Building Dear City Council, I strongly urge the approval of the Subsequent EIR for the proposed water treatment plant in Huntnnglon Beach for the following reasons I This region needs additional sources of water This region is a desert 2 The projects impact on our ocean environment has been scientifically shown to be insignificant As with any project, there are tangible impacts HoweNer any marginal impacts far and away outweigh the benefits of having a ne\v souice of clean, potable water for this desert region 3 The piolect will benefit oui city's coffers with a neck, desperately needed re�enue stream, 4 The project will prov ide in emergeney supply of stoied water in the event of an emergency \�c all know what happened with Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans Water e\peris have demonstrated the potential for disaster should a Sacramento Delta levy fail or the California Aqueduct were to be damaged in an earthquake or other calamity Anything that we can do locally to provide emergency water for our residents enhances public safety 3 It is a privately funded project, not a new governinent bureaucracy Taxpayers are in no way responsible for the success or failuie of the project 6 The project utilizes best use practices for the intake ! outflow cooling v�ater aheady used by the AES power plant 7 Huntington Beach wtv government retains contiol of the project If the piolect is not approved, a government agent} is likely to build a facility in the same location and HB will receive no benefits Government does not create prosperity, private business does 8. The city will receive a measure of water at below market rates 9 The piolect will provide direct and indirect jobs for taxpayers 10 The project will be a significant improvement to a blighted area 1 I The project will not involve the HB iedevelopment i-en('y I respectfully ask you to support the public's interest and approve the SUR for the piopoaed project as soon as possible Smceiely, 4zfl<�� Norm Westwell Husband, Parent Huntington Beach Hoincowner HB Business 0,Aner School District Trustee 17171 Englewood Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Item 4m m Page 108 -164- RECEIVED JUN 2 1 2M Dept of Planning & Building I Mayor Cathy Green 3Lrne 1, 2010 Huntington Beach Cihv Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 926,18 Dear Mayor Green, My name is Rich Kolander, and I am a retired engineer nom Boeing M,., mantra ;:tile :oiking as an engineer v.-as"Prior Planning Pre%,ents Poor Performance " That approach to planning certninl. ap�,lies to our water supply here in Orange Count. We need additional sources in Orange Count,,,, to guarantee a reliable ,-;atei suppl.- A :titer 5uppl1. dedicated solely to Orange Count., located in Orange Count,, capable of suppl;,ing 50 rlirllion gallons a day of drinking ,.,ater That is exactly ;.hat Poseidon ';;ants to do, using sea-,ater as a source and the technology of Reverse Osmosis There are over 12,600 Reverse Osmosis installations vxildv;ide It's time vie join the rest of the ',1ro1Id in using the latest technolog,., to suppk vrater to Orange Colint I full�' support the Subsequent EIR ;:hich IS under revie;: I hope the Cit, Council ;;ill auprotie it and allovl, Poseidon to t,urld this %`erg, �akidble project Sincerely, Rich Wander -165- Stem 4e - Page 109 RECEIVED Robert W. Harrison JUN 2 11 w° 9332 Greenwich-Drive Dept of Planning Huntington Beach, CA 92646-3526 &Building (714) 504-0291 June 2, 2010 Dear Mayor Green, As a retired engineer and member of the boards of directors of the Bolsa Chica Conservancy and ISA (International Society-of Automation) Technical Society, I'm fully in favor of the desalination facility that Poseidon is proposing. I hope that the City Council will approve the Subsequent EIR for the proposed desalination facility in Huntington Beach. I have lived in southeast Huntington Beach for 40 years, and I believe that the project will benefit the city and the entire region-with the water supplies that will be created The opponents are the people who oppose every improvement in our city, and many of them do not even live here. Their assertions that the plant will harm the environment are based on falsehoods. Poseidon Resources is asking to build a project that meets all the requirements of the Coastal Act, and the city's own zoning codes. I respectfully request that you approve the SEIR for this project when it comes before you for consideration. Sincerely, Robert W. Harrison, PE ISA Fellow Item 4. - Page 110 -166- Ralph Bauer RECEIVED 16511 Cotuit Circle Huntington Beach, CA 926491tl 714-846-3927 Dept Of Planning ,Lune 3. 2010 Building Mayor Cathy Green City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green During this time of economic downturn Southern Californians are facing, it is clear that there -is need for alternative eater sources in Orange County Scientists and water experts are predicting that our current water shortage will only get worse As formei Maym and City Council member of Huntington, I respectfully uige the City Council to give just consideration to Poseidon Resouices' proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility With years of e\perience as a membet of the Chamber of Commerce and board member of the Bolsa Chica Land Frust, 1 think I bring credibility to this issue and feel a strong sense of urgency to express my support for building this plant The plant's long-term financial benefits and the emergency supplies provided to the City in case of an outage due to an earthquake or another emergency are benefits that I think we can t afford to say no' to I understand that the project is under review again, this time \is the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report If appiw ed, Poseidon will be able to draw ocean water for desalting instead of being required to use the water that is withdrawn by AES for their cooling operation I hope you mll approve the SEIR I am a long-time resident of Huntington Beach and 1 have supported this project since its proposal Having raised my family here, I understand the importance of ensuring adequate uatet supplies for the sake of our children and futuie residents of this county I trulv believe it is time for the Coastal Commission to permit the Huntington Beach desalination project so that it can start benefiting our legion as soon is possible 1 offer my complete support for the Huntington i3each Seawater Desalination Facility.and I encourage the City Council to approve this proposal in a timely manner as it is crucial during this time of statewide eater crisis Sincerely, -167- Stem 4® m Page 1II RECEIVED Dallas Weaver AIN 2 1 2al0 8152 Evelyn Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Dept of Planning &Building Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Hunfrngton Beach, CA 92648 June 7, 2010 Dear HB City Council Having attended several meeting and discussions on the stability and relcab0ity of our water supply in the face of a natural dtisaster or a -political/legal shutdown of the Delta Water extraction, it is clear that a major earthquake or some judicial decision could shut down a major component of our water supply If an earthquake on the San Andres fault damaged the pumps over the mountains, the U S no longer has the forging capacity to replace the pumps in a reasonable amount of time Lead f mes could be in the several-year time scale - meanwhile we have no water from central Calif A similar earthquake in the bay area could shut the system down for a year or more All landscaping, pools, fountains, auto-washes would have to go along with flushing toilets more than once a day This is a huge and unacceptable risk when you have most of your water traveling across one of the most active earthquake faults in the world I have also conducted research into the impingement and entrainment issue associated with the power plant and the input water supply for the desalinization unit and find the "concerns" about the impact of this water supply on our marine ecology to be insignificant relative to natural processes impacting the marine ecology For example, those who worry about fish eggs, zooplankton and phytoplankton being removed with the water must ask themselves what happens to the organisms in the water running up the beach from the famous surf city surf That water gets filtered into the sand and all the organisms in the water are killed in vastly larger numbers than what we are talking about with the power plant, but their reproduction rates vastly exceed even this natural kill rate in our marine ecology The impact on our marine ecology of this water removal is literally like the impact of spitting in the ocean, insignificant by all measures Poseidon Resources Corporation has a plan in place to get a desalination plant up and running here in Orange County within a couple of years of getting approval from the regulatory agencies Item 4. - Page 112 -168- Soon, you will be considering approval of their Subsequent EIR, I hope you will approve this so that the desalination plant can start benefiting our county as soon as possible I live near the proposed location and will be glad when the useless oil tanks are gone Sincerely, Dallas Weaver, PhD, P E -169- Item 4. - Page 113 RECEIVED Phyllis Nichols JUN 21 2010 5592 Metnhardt Road Westmmste►, CA 92683 DePt of Planning (714) 373-9896 &Building TO Huntington Beach City Council DATE June 4,2010 SUBJECT: SEIR for Poseidon Resources' Desalination Protect Dear City Council Members, Before moving to u'estminster recently, 1 was a long-tine Huribneton Beach resident 1 am a businesswoman and community volunteer, having worked for more than 12 years on the Duck-A-Thon which benefits the Huntington Beach Community Clinic I am in favor of the proposed Poseidon desalination facility in I lunt►ngton Beach and its Subsequent EIR which will allow for direct extraction of ocean water M) husband and I have traveled to the island of Curacao and saw the results of using seawater desalination there For and coastal regions with little rainfall, this source and process just make sense Our county and Huntington Beach itself x&ill gain much-needed economic benefits along �Nith a promise of a secure emergency water Supply and the ability to purchase eater at a fair market rate We need this nev source of water in Southern Calito►nia When my husband and I first started hearing about this project, Ae %sere told that construction could start as early as 2003 Considering our current water supply picture, and in view of the results of environmental studies and court rulings in favor of the project, I hope the City Council will do all it can to male this happen I support this project and the promise it holds for the future, Sincerely, Phyllis Nichols Item 4. e Page 114 -170- Noble Msite 19402 Coraltvood Lane RECEIVED Hcrntington Beach, CA 92646 :: f_.r J Dept of Planning June 2, 2010 &Building Dear HB City Council, As a fottncr board member at Orange County Water District (21 years) and West Orange County Water District (8 years), and Huntington Beach city councilman (4 year,,), I support building the proposed Huntington Beach Desalinaruon Project. I know that you w ill probably hear from Various ao-mmu111ty members w ith an axe to grind. HoweN'er, I think I bring ,-onsiderably more credihility to the table than ether self-prodl,umed experts Becal11,e of my knowledge cif the need we ha1,e for alternatne, droti,,ht-proof lNater sources, I am ,cry much to fa-,or of the project that has been proposed by Poseidon RcxMfices Thi, will he extremely high-duality eater our City will hive the right to buy It ,,ill also b, axadahle for purchase by agencies stich as MWDOC, Ftirthermore, the city will halve access to the desalinated water in times of emer",ency A handful of opponents seem to he of the mind,,et that they don't a ant to be bothered with the facts. The Subscgtient FIR rnakes sense. I understand that approving the SEIR will allow Poseidon to extract ocean water directly instead of taking it off thL back end of the AES cooling process I �,upporr this proposal I am cotinting, on the wisdom of the City Council to not join the very small minority of people %N ho have made up their minds based on NIMBY-ism. Get on the right bandwagon and ,(ipport the HB desal project Sincerer„ v1 j 6`,`! ,j a i 1 1- Noble Waite -171- Item 40 - Page 115 Dale Dunn RECEIVEL) 17:302 Almelo Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 J U N 2 Dept of Pl,""Ing June ?, 2010 Building Dear City Council, 1 have lived in Huntington Beach for 44 years I'm full} in favor of the desalination facility that Poseidon is proposing, including the Subsequent EIR that allows for direct extraction of ocean water in the case of the elimination of once-through cooling The reasons are simple It isn't going to harm our ocean water quality and-it will result in an economic boon for our city I trust the scientific community not the unsubstantiated claims of the opponents Scientist after wientist says-that taking water molecules out of ocean water and mixing the ocean salt with the rest of the ocean water doesn't harm the-environment You've heard that stopping the decal project is away to stop AFS Not onfv is that not true,but it's not what you'll be voting on You'll be voting on the adequacy of the Environmental )mpact Report for the desalination project,and whether it lives up to the city's standards This project will protect our enN ironment with its state-of the-art technology and many stages of oversight It will enhance our current water supply This is a renewable resource in the most basic meaning of the phrase,and it ,%ill provide a much-needed supply for future generations Poseidon isn't asking for any waivers or variances This area is zoned properly for a desalination facility and should be approved If we don't need the water today, we'll need it tomorrow I hese projects take a long time to get through the entitlement, permitting and building process Please approve this project Sincerely, Dale L Dunn 714-846-4982 Item 4. - Page 116 -172- RECEIVED JUN 2 " Chris Hammond, D.C. 20451 Kelvingrove Lane Dept Fl nning & B Huntington-Beach, CA 92646 uliding June 1, 2010 Dear HB City Council, It's time to get on the bus. paddle out, drop in, dive in (whichever phrase works for you) on the desalination project Water has been and will be a concern for-us living in this converted desert we call So Cal Our population continues to grow not only here but in the states that the Colorado River actually runs through We will have our supply From the Colorado River cut— the only questions are when and by how much There are very successful desalination plants being used around the globe and some that have had problems We can't just bury our heads in the sand For fear that we mad be hurt This is much too pressing of an issue for our community as a whole and individually—for our families and our children's families The antis point to problems of a plant in Florida, or point to the troubles with the sports complex The point is that mistakes are made and we can either stop or-learn from them to produce a better outcome Stopping generally gets you nowhere' The environmental impact is negligible, the reN enues for the county and city are promising This would be a local project with local controls 1 his is a win/win for the City of Huntington Beach So let's do the research and be prudent, but definitely move on and do the responsible thing for the generations to come Please support the SEIR for the proposed-desalination project � Rl L/ Chris Hammond -173- Item 4. - Page 117 Leonard Gleason 207 Ventte Ave, .Apt I JUN Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dept Of Planning Tune 12 2010 BUIldtng Deal Huntington Beach CaN Council I ani wwing to let kou knov. that I am adding ui'% voice to the maluittN of tevdents hete in Huntington Beach who tiuppoit plans foi a desalination plant to he hoilt to out cit-, I attended an infoimation session in Iuntington Beath a I,%i, months ago where the SEIB «a, mentioned I support Poseidon's abtlliN to get wmvi fiont the ocean in oidei to tun the desalination plant I hope you will e\eiriw Novi food judgment and approve the SGlli that N.,df lit cominn befoi c N ou t his summer Silt clef _ mo..,_ Lconaid Ic ason Items 4. - Page 118 -174- RECEIVED FROM DOUG FI_EISCHLI JUN 21 nja TO HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL Dept Of Planning DATE. JUNE 15, 2010 &Building SUBJECT PLEASE APPROVE THE SEIR I,OR I'HE POSEIDON DESALINATION PLANT I am a surfer and have long enjoyed the waves in Huntington I also have a background in water management and storm water issues,and I fully support the proposed Poseidon desalination plant I ask that you approve the SEIR which will be under consideration soon It will allow the desal plant to operate efficiently and provide water supplies to the county Please do not allow the shortsighted, selfish motives or-political agendas of a few to o,errule the benefita to the many IIelp p►otect the future of Orange County and our reg►on by say►ng YES to Poseidon Sincerely. Doug Fle►schli -175- item 4. - Page 119 Jante Wolicki RECEIVED 9732 Blue Reef Drive 2 �Q Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-316-4675 Dept of Planning 06/09/2010 & Building Mayor Cathy Green Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Subject: Approval of the Subsequent Environmental impact Report(SEIR) for the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility Dear Mayor Green The City spent more than four years examining all aspects of the pioposed desalination project,the E1R has been approved,and the Regional Water Control Board —Santa Ana Region has approved the project's discharge permit I hope you will carefully review the scientific and environmental effects of this project and request that you approve the SIER that w ill allow Poseidon Resources to withdraw water-from the ocean to make into tap water the benefits and positive effects of building the decal plant are Proven technology The Reverse Osmosis process has been proven and improved for many years It is very effective and environmentally iesponsible The long-term costs are competitive N.�ith the cost of imported water With Orange Count) importing about 50 percent of its water from Northein California and the Colorado River, desalination is one of the best solutions for I luntmgton Beach and other Orange County cities Tax Revenues The Poseidon desalination plant will provide the City of Huntington Beach wrath approximately $1 8 million in taxes each year We need this money in order to offer the city services our residents have come to expect Water Storage Poseidon Resources �+ill prrn ide, free of charge, a 10 million gallon water tank foi the city's rise Employment As we are all aware, the unemployment rate in Orange County is one of the highest in the country This project «ill provide about 2,000 jobs for the tuo)ears of construction, and an additional t�%o dozen full-tune jobs once the facility is operational Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, Item 4. - Page 120 -176- Brenda Walters 17992 Baron Circle, #1 RECEIVED Huntington Beach, CA 92647 714-580-5057 JUN 2 12010 6/9/2010 Dept of Planning &Budding Mayor Cathy Green Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Approval of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) for the-proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility Dear Mayor Green The City spent more than four years examining all aspects of the proposed desalination project, the EIR has been approved, and the Regional Water Control Board-- Santa Ana Region has approved the project's discharge permit I hope you will carefully review the scientific and environmental effects of this project and request that you approve the SIER that will allow Poseidon Resources to withdraw water from the ocean to make into tap water The benefits and positive effects of building the desal plant are Proven technology The Reverse Osmosis process has been proven and improved for many years it is very effective and environmentally responsible The long-term costs are competitive with the cost of imported water With Orange County importing about 50 percent of its water from Northern California and the Colorado River, desalination is one of the best solutions for Huntington Beach and other Orange County cities Tax Revenues The Poseiden desalination plant will provide the City of Huntington Beach with approximately $1 8 million in taxes each year We need this money in order to offer the city services our residents have come to expect Water Storage Poseidon Resources will provide, free of charge, a 10 million gallon water tank for the citv's use Employment As we are all aware, the unemployment rate in Orange County is one of the highest in the country This project will provide about 2,000 jobs for the two years of construction, and an additional two dozen full-time jobs once the facility is operational Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, Brenda Walters -177- Item 4. - Page 121 The Schnitzers- RECEIVED 21552 Impala Lane 1UN 2 12010 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Dept of Planning 3une 9, 2010 &Building Dear City Council, Re: Poseidon Seawater Treatment Facility As a 38 year resident-of Huntington Beach, We would like to take this opportunity to express our support for the SEIR for the-Poseidon project. We lived at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba from 1974 to 1976 and there was a DESAL PLANT there. The water tasted good and was plentiful. Many farmers in the Imperial Valley lost their crops this year as I'm sure you are aware and we here in Huntington Beach were told to conserve water. Anything that allows Poseidon to operate a reasonable desalination plant in our county should be approved. You are serving on our city council to show leadership and backbone, this is your chance to do both. It has taken a very long time to get through the permitting process on this project. I think the time is now to make decisions that will result in the project getting built. Please say YES to a future with enough water and YES to Poseidon. Very truly yours, , �. trL � 1'.,off ' L�r 5c n ei f Item 4. - Page 122 -178- RECEIVED Jl,IN 21 20 i.3 Dept of Planning I & BUilding Gilbert W Coates 1341 Prospect Ave Long Beach, California 90804 Date June 14, 2010 Subject YES ON POSEIDON! Dear HB City Council I am a long-time resident of Long Beach While I enjoy this part of California, I recognize that we live in an and climate and our water resources need to be augmented by as many creative alternatives as are available I hope you will approve the Huntington Beach Desal Plant's subsequent EIR-when it comes before you in August I hope you will create a legacy as visionary leaders and approve the desalination plant Sincerely, Gilbert W Coates -179- Item 4. - Page 123 RECEIVEDEt! [.gird Coatings Resource Corporation JUN 2 12010 15541 Commerce Lanc Huntington BcaLh,CA 92049 Dept of Planning & Building Huntington BCa4h City Counwl 2000 Main Sti ect Huntington BcaiA CA 92048 June 10, 2010 Subject PLCASL 1,O FE `YLS' ON PQSf IDON'S S( lR Dear City Council Thank you for all the time you commit to our community 1 know you work hard to make decisions that are in our community'-,best interest To that end, 1 am asking you to vote in favor of Subsequent CIR (SF,IR) fot the Poseidon desalination plant Phis will be a very good project and will make our wty and county leaders in planning for our future Thank you for taking my opinion into Lonsidetation All the best, Eel Laud 6#ern 4. - Page 124 -180- UZANNE'S CATERING 9121 Atlanta Avenue, #227 - Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Phone 714-960-9197• http://www.suzannescatering.com Huntington Beach City Council RECEIVED 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 JUN 2 12010 16 June 12, 2010 Dept of Planning Dear City Council, & Building I am writing to express my support for Poseidon Resources Corporation's desalination facility,, and to let you know that I hope you will approve the Subsequent EIR which has been prepared Despite recent rains, Southern California is experiencing a severe water shortage It promises to get worse I believe we need more water sources to meet current and future water needs Conservation is effective as part of the picture, but we need additional new water sources The proposed seawater desalination plant is a good fit for our community and a great source of reliable water I am a business owner and I know how essential a reliable water supply is to our economy I am also resident of Southeast Huntington Beach and I have raised my children in Huntington Beach We need to ensure that our water supply challenges are solved for our children and our children's children down the road. Ever since this project was proposed for Huntington Beach, I have supported it I can see the AES plant from my house and I support the proposed co-location of the desalination project there The investors and owners of Poseidon Resources, as well as the residents of Huntington Beach and greater Orange County have been patiently awaiting the development of the Huntington Beach Desalination project. This project has been reviewed by Coastal Commission staff for two years now It is time for the Commission to hear from the applicant I urge you to set a date for a public hearing as soon as possible The future of our community is critical in terms of water supply and infrastructure Please approve the proposed project Sincer ly, n ukema -181- Item 4. - Page 125 RECEIVED JUN ? 1 € 10 Dept of Planning & Building 17422 Lido Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 June 10, 2010 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear City Council, I wish to voice my support of the construction of the Poseidon Water Treatment Facility in Huntington Beach, knowing very well that there is a need for a clean and more dependable water source for our area for the future The Subsequent EIR that has been completed and will be under your consideration soon will provide Poseidon the opportunity to draw water for the desalination facility. In light of the recent legal-decision against once- through cooling, this new plan makes sense As a chemistry teacher I know that desalination using the reverse osmosis technique is environmentally sound. The design and landscaping planned will certainly improve that industrial area and our special oceanfront, and the new water storage units will be a major asset to our community in an emergency. Since 1968 I have enjoyed living in Huntington Beach, and volunteering in community environmental affairs. As one of many quiet but dedicated environmentalists in the area, 1 urge you to approve the project and support the construction of this water treatment facility in Huntington Beach Sincerely, r r Margaret Carlberg mcarlberg u,ix.neteorn com Item 4. - Page 126 -182- Ralph Bauer 16511 Cotuit Circle Huntington Beach,CA 92649 RECEIVED 714-846-3927 JUN 21 2010 June 9,2010 Dept of Planning Mayor Cathy Green &Building City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main-Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Cathy During this time of economic downturn Southern Californians are facing, it is clear that there is a need for alternative water sources in Orange County Scientists and water experts are predicting that our current water shortage will only get worse As former Mayor and City Council member of Huntington Beach, I respectfully urge the City Council to give lust consideration to Poseidon Resources proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility With years of experience as a business owner, an active member of the Chamber of Commerce, a doctorate in chemistry, and a Huntington Beach resident for 46 years, I think I bring credibility to this issue and feel a strong sense of urgency to express my support for building this plant The plant's long-teim financial benefits and the emergency supplies provided to the City in case of an outage due to an earthquake or another emergency are benefits that I think we can't afford to say `no' to I understand that the project is under review again, this time via the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report If approved, Poseidon will be able to draw ocean water for desalting instead of being required to re-use the water that is withdrawn by AhS for their cooling operation I hope you will approve the SE1R I have supported this project since its proposal Having raised my family here, I understand the importance of ensuring adequate water supplies for the sake of our children and future residents of this county I truly believe it is time for the Huntington Beach desalination project to be built so that it can start benefiting our region as soon as possible I offer my complete support for the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility,and I encourage the City Council to approve this proposal in a timely manner as it is crucial during this time of statewide water crisis Sincerely, Ralph Bauer -1 83- Item 4. - Page 127 SPENCER 1NGRAHAM 32134 VIRGINIA WAY RECEIVED LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 949/244 3705 JUN 2 12010 June 10, 2010 Dept Of Planning & Building Dear City Council of Huntington Beach, I understand that there is a subsequent EIR (SEIR) under review for the Hunting- ton Beach desalination project I have researched the impending Huntington Beach Poseidon project and would like to encourage you to help the developers of this project to get through the approval process as soon as possible, including the SEIR. SUPPORT THIS PROJECT,AND I AM NOT ALONE. With support from the Orange County Business Council, various chambers of commerce and a long list of elected officials — both Democrats and Republicans —the project has received widespread praise as an important adjunct to our water supply And, with Colorado River water supplies having been cut by 50% within the last few years, and the problems in the Delta, NEW WATER SOURCES ARE NECESSARY. I encourage you to take into consideration the opinions of voters like me who support moving forward with the Huntington Beach project, and I urge you to do it as soon as possible Our futures depend on it Thank you, Spencer Ingraham Item 40 - Page 128 -184- DECEIVED John Prusa JUN Z 12010 Dept of Planning 16657 Arbor Circle &Building Huntington Beach , CA 92647 P/F : 714-842-9OD4 619I1 Q Dear HB City Council What would happen to the residents and ousinesses in Huntington Beach and Orange County if we have a severe water shortage and there is not enough clean, fresh water?The prospect of this happening is a real possibility, and I as a Huntington Beach resident, don't want to find out about the-consequences if it did occur Therefore I would like to see that additional water sources be made available so that we can safeguard against future shortages I believe that the desalination plant proposed by-- Poseidon Resources is a good source for Huntington Beach and the rest of Orange County As part of the original EIR process, thorough research has been conducted to ensure that the water produced by the Huntington Beach Desalination facility would be healthful, the plan is cost effective, there are no negative aesthetic effects and it is an overall environmentally sound solution Furthermore, the subsequent environmental document means that Poseidon will have access to as much seawater as needed to produce an abundant supply of tap water for Orange County San Diego County has already obtained State approval for a desalination plant and the process has been effectively used in the U S and more than 120 countries around the world The Huntington Beach business community, including the Chamber of Commerce, of which I am a member has endorsed the Huntington Beach protect The time is now for the Huntington Beach Desalination Plant I ask that the City Council approve the SEIR and do something good for our economy and the overall well-being of Huntington Beach residents and businesses by swiftly providing their approval for this long awaited and worthwhile project' Sincerely, John Prusa ' -1�5- Item 4m - Page 129 RECEIVED ii IVIICHAFI I. TASKER 9921 BOND CIRCLE Dept of Planning HUTTING 1 ON BEACH,CA 92646 & SUildong (714)583-2603 MIKE 1 ASKLR WVERIZON 15ET June 9, 2010 Dear Huntington Beach City Council, In an August 20, 2008, editorial (' Coastal Commission decision worth its Salt'), fhe Orange County Register urged ` goveinment gatekeepers" like the Coastal Commission to get out of the way of and not obstruct progress on desalination projects I am hoping that the approvals for the necessary Huntington Beach desalination plant, which would bring a new source of water to Or- ange County residents utilizing the same technology as the approved Carlsbad project, will be obtained soon A survey of Orange County voters conducted in September 2008 shows that there is a consider- able amount of support for the proposed facility The survey, which was conducted by the Or- ange County Business Council and the Los Angeles/Orange County Building Trades Council, showed that 72 percent of respondents believe that seawater desalination is a good idea, and 71 percent believe that local water agencies should add desalinated water to their supply sources I think these numbers reflect county residents' understanding of the importance of diversifying our water supplies t wish our government gatekeepers would show their understanding as well I hope you will approve the SE1R when it comes before you Best regards. Item 4e a Page 130 -186- Mike i asker -187- Item 40 - Page 131 RECEIVED Chuck Roberts Dept of Planning 12704 George Reyburn Road & Building Garden Grove , CA 92845 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach , CA 92648 June 11, 2010 To Whom It May Concern: I have lived 7n West Garden Grove most of my life, and I have never -felt compelled to write a letter to any regulatory agencies before now. However, I feel the Poseidon desalination plant is one of the most important projects under consideration in Orange ' County This desalination plant will provide insurance for what most intelligent people understand will be a very real problem in the near future: the lack of an adequate drinking water supply in California. I hope you will take our county' s needs into consideration when you review the Subsequent EIR in the next couple of months . Please don ' t hold the rest of us hostage to a few unhappy residents and their outside supporters who fear anything new or don ' t want this "in their backyards " PLEASE VOTE TO APPROVE THE POSEIDON PROJECT Sincerely, Chuck Roberts Item 4. - Page 132 -188- RECEIVED Susan Lister jUN 21 20-�U 2210 Waterfront Drive Dept of Planning Corona del Mar, CA 92625 & Building June 16, 2010 Dear Huntington Beach Council, I just wanted to send a brief note to let you know that 1, along with many, many other residents of Orange County,support the Poseidon water treatment facility/desalination plant, The water It will provide is incredibly important, given the amount of(lack of} rainfall we get every year I've heard some of the arguments against the plant and find that none holds much water (pardon the pun) These are the desperate arguments of those who oppose pretty much everything This is a golden opportunity to provide a service that will protect us in the future and benefit us in the present Please do the right thing and endorse the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report that is necessary for the operation of the Poseidon plant Thank you Susan Lister -189- Item 4. - Page 133 Cathy Meschuk RECEIVED 20451 Kelvingrove Lane Jt,N 2 12010 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Dept of Planning & Building May 20, 2010 Dear City Council I have lived in Southeast Huntington Beach near the location that is proposed for a desalination plant, for 17 years I am the Past President of the Huntington Beach Council On Aging and I formerly served as the Executive Director of the Huntington Beach Educational Foundation Everything I do revolves around children and the elderly The children are counting on you to ensure their water supplies for the future and will be expecting to inherit a city that is in sound fiscal health The seniors are expecting you to provide for the services they have come to expect They took care of us and now it's time to take care of them The water reliability that will be provided by the desalination plant is a clear benefit, as is the emergency supply of water Our children are counting on us to take care of their future A reliable, safe, drought-proof water supply is a very important part of that future The people who are opposing this project oppose every new project in the city They lost Costco for us They very nearly cost us Wal-Mart They would have defeated Pacific City if they could have I live in Southeast Huntington Beach and I can't wart to utilize Pacific City's businesses when they're built This same crowd would have kicked the Hyatt and the Hilton out of town if they'd had the chance These are the same businesses that help to bring so many tourists to town—the same tourist industry these fomenters are so keen to protect now After reviewing the Subsequent EIR, I support Poseidon's project and I request that you do so,too Sincerely, JOAO Cathy Meschuk Item 4. - Page 134 -190- G- Susie Caskey 27182 Hidden Trail RECEIVED Laguna Hills, CA 92653 JUN 21 2010 Dept of Planning & Building May 25,2010 The Honorable Cathy Green Mayor of Huntington Beach,CA 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green: When reviewing the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR), it is important to remember the purpose and need for the project. This project will provide Orange County with a completely new water supply that will serve eight percent of Orange County's population. The California Water Plan Update 2009 recognizes the need for a drought-proof water supply that desalination can provide. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California has identified the need for 150,000 acre-feet of desalination in its service area by 2020. Even if constructed,the Huntington Beach project would provide only about a third of that total need. While we were blessed this year to have an "El Nino"wet winter,it would be irresponsible for our community leaders to roll the dice year in and year out hoping for rains that may or may not come. In the three years prior to 2010,California faced the 13th worst drought over the last century. In addition to these dry conditions,fishery protection measures in the Delta reduced our ability to import water from Northern California by 10 percent. Between environmental regulations,agricultural needs, and recurring droughts, it is incumbent upon Orange County to develop its own local,drought-proof reliable water resource. -191- Item 4. - Page 135 e x Please vote to certify the SEIR and approve this new water resource for Huntington Beach and all of Orange County. Sincerely, —'J� 644�zr Susie Caskey 27182 Hidden Trail Laguna Hills,CA 92653 cc: Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devm Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen Item 4m - Page 136 -192- RECEIVED I he Hon Cathy Green JUN Z 12010 Mayor City of I luntington Beach Dept of Planning 2000 Main Street & Building Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE. SUPPORT for certification of DSEIR of HB Seawater Desalination Facility Dear Mayor Green As a veteran of the U S Navy I used desalinated water to bathe, cook with and drink while serving my country The water was of very high-quality, but we always had to conserve because of the limited suppl\ Now Orange County has the opportunity to add desalinated seawater to its water supply portfolio on a much larger-scale Fifty million gallons of fresh drinking water per day' What a boon for Orancye County' The Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(DSEIR)states that all environmental impacts are"less than significant_" What should be considered rs that for every gallon of water we produce locally is one less gallon we need to import from Northern California. That means more water for the Delta Smelt and other endangered and threatened species in Northein California and more water for our Central Valley farmer~that have been suffering with a 40%unemployment rate while their farms go dry due to pumping restrictions This project benefits Orange County, the environment, California farmers. union workers and our local economv Please ,ote to certify the DSFIR Sincerely. 1.�/ �~- Russell Wrrioe `35 F Maple A\e Oiange CA 92806 cc Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman.Joe Carchio Councilman Oil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwvet Councilman Don Hanscn -1 J3- Item 4. - Page 137 RECEIVED The Hun 0,4by Cirvoi JUN 2 Mayof City Of Uluntiligton OCull Dept Of Planning 20M Main Strom & Building H on witingt Beach, CA 922648 Rr- SUPPORT for ceTtifivation of DSEYR of 1111 Se.<Awater betMioadnn Favility, Dear Mavor Green Me ofil term for projeas being baind by burealictacy -rrd tape" Me rte%v term, thank-'s to many of our ffiends in the ev ironwevtal qvifemist rnuvoment i-o*"grAen talus" The Pt Rcwurom%turkoter dmilination f&dl ity haq bc!cn bound by this weem 4ape for more dtanadecatic ThunkAilly the pioceKs at the l al level bas 111W,�*d ,elafively SWIMY "wn par chl t(y the ghu-ial pace permitting approvals mn.ve as the state legal Southrva Califoriiia jimnaged to hang on through a devastatiag fcurAyear drolight atreJ even after twjsxvcl -Mntm ourrmave's are.still ncA Ailly mplenisiteti nmit tv bufl" Durmg the pubhe fiewistg, apAl ['13)q1re IM Vi)W fetttfS �'01.1 W11 We uni hezir wa.bng' of teeth and It teary for the micrasr-opic fish cv, or the p1mbon t4ai m,4 �urvi,,e the desal wation prL�c-t-so,. lh)n t be fbaled 11.1%A 1-ttX-.nL Lint er\Jew, 'SurfirW er',,nm i n stater' pubitcly that his main cvnccrn vs that thi%pro)mt wal create gTo%lh in Orange Ciminty I L% cani)-,i that, fie d �tpjmremtv like tii turn OC intria third vsofM%xurary omfi crumb"ing infraqr-wtu,c and ry-i airxr a, y rvaWc it vvoulci prtw-w, w mak-k-ow contillumiles,so 1"11 Vov,th the taitt-t ar,that gnxxth will txxur vArat ou-mit m6-astructure-,-,available 11,-65 p sti-ving the init- apamnt,.0ten ob I owrish"larou of Imba and Chino, that havc large"x plea' vote to ck-rfltiv tht DSFIR sw):his prtqect imin move rcirwatc!in the pemitting proc" M'Iyvl pru I cm MI I-brd'Wy c-unciii-nap'Keith B-ikr Oil Doi'i Hansen Item 4. - Page 138 -194- RECEIVED 1'hc Hon. Cathy Green Mayor Dept of Planning City of Huntington Beach & Building 2060 Main Street I Iuntington Beach CA 92648 RE: SUPPORT for certification of DSEIR of HR Seawater Desalination Facility Dear Mayor Green, Orange County needs a new, reliable,drought proof water supply and I encourage you to support the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalinatton Facility and certify the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) Even though the project will not-emit any greenhouse gasses,Poseidon Resources has agreed to a greenhouse gas reduction plan that will offset the greenhouse gasses created by the-power plant that provides the energy needed to desalinate the seawater It's this type of responsible environmental stewardship that should be encouraged This is probably one reason why Poseidon was named to GC Metro's 2010 Green Team, Please vote to certify the DSEIR Sincerely, Patricia Barrios 235 E Maple AN e Orange. CA 92866 e.c Mayor Pro I ern ,)ill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil C'ocrper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen Item 4. - Page 139 The Hon Cathy Green DECEIVED Mayor JUN Z 12010 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Dept of Planning Huntington Beach,CA 92648 & Building RE: SUPPORT for certification of DSEIR of HB Seawater Desalination Facility Dear Mayor Green As a mother of two young boys who look forward to making Orange County their home in the decades to come, it is imperative that we have the infrastructure necessary to continue to make our community great After suffering through a four-year drought it is clear that Orange County needs a new, reliable, drought- proof, high-quality drinking water source The Huntington Beach Seawater Desalmation Facility can provide that new water we need As an Orange County native myself, I know that our beaches are the best tourist attraction that Orange County has Quite simply, it is our economic lifeblood and must be protected The desalmat►on facility will do nothing to negatively impact our coastal resources according to the scientists that analyzed the project in the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(DSEIR) However, the project will provide Orange County with a new cost-certain water source that will help unshackle us from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) MWD's rates have rocketed up in recent years with double-digit increases in each of the last three years While MWD and the State work to balance the needs for environmental protection (the Delta Smelt), agricultural needs (the Central Valley farms) and people (Southern California), it is clear that being at the"end of the pipeline" is a dangerous place to be Orange County has long been a bastion of self-reliance and self-sufficiency Let's continue that tradition by creating our own new water source to replace at least a portion of the unreliable imported water we get from Sacramento Sincerely, Ar►anna Barrios 360 N Pine St Orange, CA 92866 cc Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Cai ch io Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen Item 4m - Page 140 -1 g6- TO �Urant anp RECEIVE® ©eP3t of Planning June 16,2010 & Builcj,ng The Hon Cathy Green Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members As a longtime Huntington Beach resident, I am very interested in the development of the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility Of particular concern to me are the salinity levels of the discharge on our coastline After reviewing the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) I was pleased to learn that the project will have no significant impact on any sea-life As someone who frequents our beach, it was important to me to understand the ocean quality impacts and it makes sense for this project to use the intake and outfall pipe that exist today rather than building new infrastructure to draw in and put out seawater As I understand it,within a few hundred feet of the outfall pipe,the salinity levels return to ambient After careful review, I believe this project deserves the support of the Huntington Beach City Council While the environmental impacts are less than significant,the economic impact to our community is quite significant to the benefit of all Huntington Beach taxpayers Two million dollars per year in our general fund and a 10 million gallon emergency storage tank make this project a win for our city Please vote to certify the DSEIR so we can have access to the 50 million gallons of fresh drinking water this project will provide Sincerely, Vince Brantley Huntington Beach cc Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen Orgonizational Sustainability through Relevancy implementation www BrantCompany com -197- Item 4. - Page 141 RECEIVED The Hon Cathy Green Dept of Planning Mayor & Building City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: SUPPORT for certification of DSEIR of HB Seawater Desalination Facility Dear Mayor Green After reviewing the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) for the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility, it is clear that this report should be certified and the project should be approved. There are no significant impact to coastal resources including impingement, entrainment, salinity discharge or any other issues that would significantly negatively affect marine life The alternatives to the open water intake system would be beach wells that would result in the loss of several miles of coastal resources on the beach People don't come to the beach to view miles of beach wells operating The benefit of the project as it is currently proposed is that it uses existing infrastructure that runs under the beach and out of the view of the public This project will provide a new drinking water supply to Orange County It should be noted that any new water resource will have SOME environmental impact Even importing water has an environmental impact The benefit of this project is that it is local, drought-proof and cost- certain Please vote to certify the DSEIR Smcerel�, �-- John WhitmY . Charles Abbott Associates 27401 Los Altos Mission Viejo, CA cc Mayor Pro Tem. Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen Stem 4. - Page 142 -198- RECEIVED JUN 2 12010 Cathy Gwri Dept of Planning 110 ISM & Buking qvjaYkNT (ay 00, awo main stleet A �)2648 7AUSCtat' owswr of'Os f �11 on mayol 610�� ter"til" wrtume 01,b4lsi ng dc6s two it1j" -,f nj5l, .5�;T<jo, As a NOW Boon KC44 "tafl� rt 1` 0,on.SONjitte-i del-oll"W14" jvva,��j R,�,tpoli ,J111 'rjal itar 'Mal C, c'utwperit 'I A,lz qaMe TV W8 - 0<10 tile vc yoku are Oahgal Of -fit I tbt�pv(l ified le is vvslal de you 41 AR ;MAAd to ter, y AM M tile J)'Osalimmisn FAN. the I h1vac — i2VY10", ao f I om& a asw 10 labW stjjjj$jt4 111p,140 SUO c the lv�ed err P Al NV1r it - PTO Ins,at, TwIlk will bt�� It 11%`b thk;pf,019 ,,w'I AOW bese that CA it wSpads ale ack$ J,bmp mw, , Anal ZO the, NN W YOU 90 jNie I)SEV11 czj)f, 1015 tluart Slgtlifl w, v - Ali, vViV11,10-a 1), Jill tlald' cc OhT Krilh B(b Joe Qvchio as 6,11 COtTkIf Wul Ow';o, Item 4. - Page 143 RECEIVED The Hou, Cathy GtM Mayor JUN 2 city of Huatinpon 13mch Dept Of Planning 20(9)Mean Sari &BUIlding Ffuntinqtori Beach, CA Q2648 RE: Stf PPORT for vertirication of I)SCIR of H 8 Lasater Desalivation Facility Dear Mayor Cirmol- The Draft Su4soqucnt]FAvironmental I nlp=t Report M)shows that my emi ronmeroat irn pcis restating From the revisiom to this project vv considered 41ess than siguilicaat " Based on these scierAific-findings, I vvou[A emounage you to supimin and certify the T)SFMR and allow this much twided wales pwirk-afiou project to move rotward William J Lochrte 1957 HeA-44m Or Fullerton,CA a Nlayur Pro Tern Jill Hardy Coun,ctlm4n Keith Bohr Coumdrttau Joe Carchiq Cmncifman Oil Cowper Councit'Man Dv��n Dwyer ("Ouncifulan,to flamen Item 4. - Page 144 -200- RECEIVED Jan Shomaker JuN 2 1 Z010 28016 Galling Mission Viejo, CA 92692 Dept of Planning Phone (714) 501-9677 & Building Mr Ricky Ramos City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 June 7, 2010 Dear Mr Ramos I am a Mission Viejo resident (formerly an HB resident and HB Planning Com- missioner) who supports the Poseidon Desalination project and hope to see the neces- sary permits and approval processes occur soon Poseidon has worked closely with the Coastal Commission for a long period of time and it is time for progress to be made It's obvious that water supplies are strained, which has caused local water agen- cies to recycle waste water and use other technologies to bring us more water Desali- nating ocean water seems like the logical next step In Huntington Beach, the project will benefit residents by providing the city with an estimated $2 million per year in annual tax revenue for 30 years, additional money that will help support the city, and ultimately help pay for local police and firefighters, parks and playgrounds, streets, sidewalks and community and senior centers In addi- tion, the plant's proposed site area in Southeast Huntington Beach will enjoy beautifica- tion old oil storage tanks will be removed, the site near Newland and PCH will be im- proved and landscaping will be added Best of all, it won't cost residents any money Desalinated water is needed in Orange County, and Huntington Beach residents will be the beneficiaries of the revenue and added benefits Even though I was not one of people talked to by telephone surveyors, I agree with the results of the survey DESALINATION IS THE WAY TO GO FOR NEW WA- TER► Please complete the permitting process and approve the Subsequent EIR so Or- ange County residents can start reaping the many benefits of this protects Sincerely, Jan Shomaker -201- Item 4. m Page 145 -Ricky Ramos RECEIVED City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ,JUN 2 i L �Huntington Beach, CA 92648 j une 1, 2010 Debt. of Planning Dear Mr Ramos: I am a long--time resident of southeast Huntington Beach, where the proposed desalinization plant will be built , and I strongly favor the project In my discussions with other residents who have learned the facts regarding the building and operation of the facility, I find overwhelming support for it I have only encountered a small group of citizens who oppose the project, and, almost without exception, their opposition is based on emotion or lack of knowledge of the facts Theirs is the minority position in my area and certainly, the minority position within the entire city To illustrate the fact that the majority of the city supports the building of the plant, the vocal minority had to go outside Huntington Beach to find at least half of their leadership I am strongly convinced that my area will benefit from the improvements and beautification aspects of the plan, the city as-a whole will benefit from the jobs, revenue, and property tax/fees the project will create, and Orange County will benefit from the resultant ready, high-quality water supply I ask that you ignore the scare tactics of the naysayers and consider only the facts relevant to this project If you do, I am confident you will move forward with the approval of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Poseidon water Treatment facility Sincerely, George Cross 198.12 Isthmus Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (714) 962-7132 Item 4m a Page 146 -202- Shirley Dettloff 6812 Laurelhurst Huntington Beach, CA 92647 RECEIVED JUN 21 2010 June 11, 1-010 Dept of Planning &Building Mr Ricky Ramos City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beady, CA 92646 Dear Mi Ramos. As a former member of the Huntington Beach City Council and a former State Coastal Coninnssioner, I would like to let you know that I support the approval of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the pioposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Protect I do not have a scientific background but I do kno%4 that California wilt always have a need for water Water is today's "vold " Desalination must be a part of our master plan for water and I urge the City Council to look at the project before them with the future in mind I respect the City Council s ability to assess the environmental elements of the Poseidon project and to male the correct decision I hope they will carcfully re%ices the ,c,ientilic and environmental effects of this project, and at the same time, know that we will have to face a future which is dependent upon water Desalination should be a part of the "tool box," but only if it meets high scientific standards. 1 hank you for your consideration Simxrely Shirley Y -203- Item 4. - Page 147 RECEIVED Martin Ageson 1 , 9121 Atlanta Avenue, #101 '� f '2 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Dept of P,--,, ning & Building Mr Ricky Ramos City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St Huntington Beach CA 92648 June 4, 2010 Dear Sir, am in favor of the Huntington Beach Desalination Facility proposed by Poseidon Resources I also support the Subsequent EIR which-is-currently under review According to the-project's Web site, the proposed construction of the desalination plant will bring more than 600 new jobs to Orange County Once it's complete, 18 full- time jobs will be created along with more than 300 related jobs In addition, it won't cost Orange County residents any money There will be no cost to the city, county, or taxpayers Instead, all costs will be borne by Poseidon In these times of economic uncertainty, one thing seems clear this project will provide Orange County with economic benefits Will you please consider the current economic climate and move forward with granting the necessary permits to make this project a reality? Sincerely, Martin Ageson Item 4. - Page 148 -204- DANA ROHRABACHER ,t> WASHINGTON OFFICE 46th District,California �� 2300 Rayburn House Office SwIckng Washington,DC 205t5-0546 Committees (202)225-2415 FAX (202)225-0145 FOREIGN AFFAIRS DISTRICT OFFICE Ranking Republocan Subcommittee on internationalOrganizations,Human t 01 Me m Street Suite 380 Rights and Oversight Huniington ea Subcommitteeona7YYof tbe iteb 6tatto (714)960--M3FAX_(714)96"806 c,and Asia the Panrwronme poWe of Repre5entatibe� the Global Enronment ii South Bay(370)377-9493 Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia hnp Ilrchrabacher house gov _SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics June 17,2010 Honorable Cathy Green � 7UN E ��� Mayor 2 2 2010City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street gton BeachHuntington Beach,CA 92648 CIt1NCIt OF-F(CE Dear Cathy: I write to support the draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR)that evaluates the environmental effects of the proposed Huntington Beach Desalination facility. I understand that you will review the SEIR at a hearing in early September As you know,during my tenure in Congress, I have consistently advocated for clean water,water supply reliability,diversification programs and projects By using existing infrastructure,the environmental footprint of the Huntington Beach Desalination Project is relatively small in light of the project's daily creation of 50 million gallons of fresh drinking water The daily output of the facility will provide eight percent of Orange County's water supply and help relieve some of the pressure on imported water from Northern California The project does not put taxpayers at risk because it is privately financed Moreover,the community will benefit from the receipt of about$70 million in tax revenue including$1 8 million per year paid directly to the City of Huntington Beach. The Huntington Beach Desalination Facility will provide Orange County's water supply with reliability, revenue and 56,000 acre-feet of water per year which will go a long way to guarantee that the Metropolitan`th/ater District and the State of California achieve their desalination goals respectfully request that you approve the Subsequent Environmental Impart Report and bring this project to fruition. Yours Sincerely, 1 .. Dana Rohrabacher Member of Congress -205- Item 40 - Page 149 CAPITOL OFFICE y tttt���� COMMITTEES STATE CAPITOL �alif ruin Matt �rnatje ROOM 5052 �` CHAIR SACRAMENTO CA 95814 PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT TEL 916 651 4034 AND RETIREMENT SENATOR SELECT COMMITTEE ON DISTRICT OFFICE CALIFORNIA EUROPEAN TRADE 2323 NORTH BROADWAY LOU CORREA SELECT COMMITTEE ON SUITE 245 SANTA ANA CA 92706 THIRTY-FOURTH SENATE DISTRICT MANUFACTURED HOMES TEL 714 558 4400 AND COMMUNITIES FAx 714 556 411 1 SELECT COMMITTEE ON �3 YOUTH EMPOWERMENT AND s YOUTH D SENATOR CORREAeSENATE CA GOV t GANG PREVENTION VICE-CHAIR 0 4" VETERANS AFFAIRS June 18,2010 MEMBER BANKING FINANCE AND I�till �� ! INSURANCE �EC E NE 11 it } BUSINESS PROFESSIONS AND u � 4 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT The Honorable Cathy Green e MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES Mayor �FFF OVERSIGHT AND City of Huntington Beach JUN 24 2010 ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach I Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CITY COUNCIL OfFlCE Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members. Thank you for conducting a Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) to determine if there will be any significant environmental impacts related to the Poseidon Resources Seawater Desalination Facility While the ability to develop a local reliable source of high quality drinking water would be a boon to Orange County, it is important to ensure the project's operation will not result in any significant environmental impacts I was pleased to see that the independent scientific analysis of the project found that the project can operate in an environmentally sensitive way and won't result in any significant impact to our coastal resources. Theconstruction of this project alone means thousands of local jobs for local residents and once completed this water purification project will produce enough water to serve about eight percent of Orange County's population Based on the science, 1 encourage you to certify the DSEIR and support the desalination project Sincere U CO A Senator, Thirty-Fourth District cc Ma_vor Pro Tern Jill Hardy Councilman Keah Bohr Councilman Joe Carchlo Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen PLEASE VISIT MY POMEPACE AT WWW SENATE CA GOWCORREA Item 40 - Page 150 -206- STATE CAPITOL COMMITTEES PO BOX 942849 AmmhltVICE CHAIR,HOUSING AND SACRAMENTO,CA 94249-0073 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (916)319.2073 , f" APPROPRIATIONS FAX(916)319-2173 � �` 11' t ��C12 BUDGET REVENUE AND TAXATION WEBSITE WWWASSEMBYCAGOWHARKEY a m a t DIANE L.HARICEY ASSEMBLYWOMAN,SEVENTY-THIRD DISTRICT June 22,2010 The Hon Cathy Green,Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members As the state representative and former mayor of Dana Point,which is the potential site of Orange County's second seawater desalimation facility,I am familiar with how uriportant this new water source would be to Orange County While the Dana Point desalination facility is still in its feasibility study stage,the project in Huntington Beach is much further along Due to the existing infrastructure for the water intake-and outfall pipes,the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility is economically viable and according to the Ctry of Huntington Beach's Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR),it is environmentally practicable as well This piojcct would provide Orange County with enough water to serve 300,000 residents It is fundamental for Orange County to take advantage of the resources-that it has and be able to provide what water we can to our residents The project is designed to add to Southern California's portfolio of locally available water and help reduce our region's dependence on the imported water we receive from Northern California and the Colorado River which continues to become increasingly costly to ratepayers and more unreliable as a source as time moves on Additionally,because this project is privately financed and funded,the Orange County taxpayers will not be at risk and upon completion and operation,the City Nvill receive millions of dollars in tax revenue from this project Please vote to certify the DSEIR and approve this water purification pro) Si c �E�E�VIE� D ARKEY JUN 2 4 2010 Assemblywoman,73*d District Huntington Beach cc Nfayor Pi Tern Jill Hardy CITY COUNCIL OFFICE Councilman Keith Bohr Councilin,in Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerpci Councilman Devm Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE•29122 RANCi40 VIEJO RD SUITE 111•SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO CA 92675-(949)347-7201•FAX(949)347-7302 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE-300 N COAST HWY•OCEANSIDE, CA 92054-(760)757-8084•FAX(760)757-8087 Pnnied on Recycled Paper -207- Item 4. o Page 151 {{�� {{�� June 21, 2010 nECOVEI JUN 2 4 2010 The Honorable Cathy Green - Mayor HuntingEon Beach City of Huntington Beach CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 2000 Maul Street Huntington Beach,California 92648 Re:Poseidon Resources Desalination Project—In strong support Dear Mayor Green My_sincere thanks to you and to members of the Huntington Beach City Council for giving careful consideration to the Desalination Project proposed for your coastline by Poseidon Resources As a long-time resident of Orange County and a former member of the Mission Viejo City Council, I appreciate your taking the time required to give this crucial project both the thorough study it '� //��'' deserves and the thoughtful review it requires. Sherri ,.1_®/1. In Orange County, drought conditions continue, uncertainty about ���� ��� the amount of water that we will be allowed to import persists, and B'uthe groundwater basin is over drafted. Despite the laudable efforts Editorial services— of local water districts to build reservoirs that will capture and iio matter contain rainwater and to encourage their Orange County customers what the type to use this essential resource wisely, the demand for fresh water is writing rewriting editing expected to exceed the supply by more than 50 percent within proofreading indexing fifteen years. When it comes to fresh water, we cannot"save"our editorial production way from scarcity to sufficiency' We must find a new, reliable, drought-proof local supply. 24626 Serendipitously for both Huntington Beach and other communities Mosquero Lame within Orange County, this local supply lies, if not at our doorstep, Mission Viejo, then at our coastline. The challenge is not Ending the water. a California 92691 sufficient quantity exists in the Pacific Ocean, where it is not (949) 86--0439 affected by local drought conditions_ The challenge is finding a way to make this seawater potable, a way that is both safe in terms P c' of the method used and efficient in terms of the energy required and will not harm the marine environment. The way Poseidon Resources proposes to make seawater potable is reverse osmosis, a method that has long been used to purify water and has been proven to be both safe and effective. When applied to seawater, it produces drinking water of very high and consistent quality, which meets or exceeds all applicable regulatory requirements established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Item 4® a Page 152 -208- Agency (EPA)and the California Department of Public Health In fact, the EPA recognizes reverse osmosis membrane treatment as the best available technology for water treatment not only to meet today's water quality standards but also to meet the requirements of future,more stringent water quality regulations Regarding energy efficiency, Poseidon will invest tens of million of dollars in constructing a Desalination Project that incorporates state-of-the-art features to minimize plant energy consumption. As a result, the amount of energy required to produce enough desalinated water for a single household for one year will be no more than the energy required to run that household's second "garage"refrigerator for a similar period of time. Regarding the environment, the Draft SEIR finds that the impingement, entrainment, and water quality salinity impacts on marine biological resources will be insignificant In fact,the actual impingement will be less than the daily diet of one brown sea pelican; no threatened, endangered, or commercially valuable species will be entrained; and the Water Quality Regional Board has determined that the Project will result in no elevated salinity impacts to marine waters. Perhaps the most important aspect of the project for you to consider, as the Mayor of Huntington Beach, are the benefits your city will receive. The Poseidon Resources facility will provide the city of Huntington Beach with an estimated $70 million over the life of the facility—including $2.45 million per year in property, sales, and utility taxes—and save the city $14 million in local water infrastructure—a savings that the city can -use to fund municipal activities,programs,and services. Because the seawater desalination project Poseidon Resources proposes is sorely needed, because the method that Poseidon will be use is safe and effective, because Poseidon proposes to construct and operate this state-of-the-art project in such a way that it will be energy efficient and will have negligible impact on the marine environment, I strongly support the project and urge your approval of the SEIR and revised project permits. t Yz Sincerely, t x,C�Y't'�'���'3��'.•�vx'1.y ss�:�'m-t�*as—'s�rm�`.m,.fl.�y ._,sue_k Sherri M.Butterfield Former Mayor of Mission Viejo -2O9- Item 4e - Page 153 ORANGE COUNTY ASSOCtATm of REALTORse A&ep Ahead June 16,2010 The Honorable Cathy Green City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members. Thank you for considering the certification of the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR)for the I luntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility This project is essential for-the future of Huntington Beach and Orange County By co-locating with the power plant and using the infrastructure that exists today. Poseidon avoids additional environmental impacts to the coastline As you know, the AES powei plant, which has been a Huntington Beach icon for more than five decades will continue producing power for the foreseeable future. Its cooling generating system may change, but the power plant itself isn't going anywhere Because the desalination facility will be permuted to draw in about a quarter of the water the power plant is currently permitted to-draw in,the marine life impacts will be significantly less than what occurs today. Your scientific analysis shows that these impacts would be"Less Than Significant," which means the project should be certified and approved I encourage your certification of the DSEIR and your suppoi t for this project Sincerely, LagunaWisOffice Dave Stefanides 25552 La Paz Road Laguna Hills,94 CA92653 Government Affairs Director lax9495864 62 Orange County Association of REALTORS(V (�� Q www ocar org cc Mavoi Pro Tem Jill Hardy JUN 21 2010 Huntington Beach Office 8071 Stater Avenue,Ste 240 Councilman Keith Bohr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach 714375-9313 Councilman Joe Carchio fax 714-375-9322 CITY COUNCIL OFFICE wwwocarorg Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen Item 4m a Page 154 -210- ocr(cc ORANGE COUNTY HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE mfo@hcoc org 2130 E Fourth St Ste 160 Fx(714)953-0273 Santa Ana CA 92705 Ph(714)953-4289 June 10,2010 The Hon Cathy Green Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members. Orange County is currently far too reliant on imported water,which continually faces environmental,agricultural and political challenges We must develop our own new water resources to diversify our water supply,insure ourselves against drought and inoculate ourselves from the growing challenges we face that are beyond our control regarding the availability of imported water Five years ago,this City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)for the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility. Because of changes in the landscape,slight revisions to the project are being considered to ensure its long-term viability and success These changes are undergoing another environmental review—a Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report The science of this project is sound and it shows in the DSEIR that none of the proposed changes will result in any significant environmental impacts. In fact,Poseidon Resources was recently named to the 2010 OC Metro Green Team for its work in protecting environmental resources I encourage you to certify the DSEIR and support the completion of this needed and wanted new water resource Sincerely, f� Javier Mier Chairman of the Board of Directors Orange County Hispanic Chamber of Commerce cc Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy EC Councilman Keith Bohr I U V E DD Councilman Joe Carchio V Councilman Gil Coerper JUN 2 Y 2010 Councilman Devm Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen Huntington Beach CITY COUNCIL OFFICE 1 � -211- Item 4e - Page 155 DIRECTORS GABS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS VIRGIL L.HANSEN'President at*04A 1� CHARLES E SHAW Secretary/General Manager SABINO CICI,Vice President CARL BONENBERGER BARBARAA CARRERA MARY CAMMARANO TreasuredFlnance&Administration Manager WELLINGTON H.LOVE o LEMIEUX&O'NEILL General Counsel OFFICE xry 8366 GRAND AVENUE CMSEit, S TELEPHONES ROSEMEAD,CA 91770 AZ E1�9 (626)287-0341 (323)283-2529 MAILING FAX(626)287-8524 PO.BOX 2227 SAN GABRIEL SAN GABRIEL,CA 91778-2227 COUNTY WATER DISTRICT June 21, 2010 C; �° ►-J 7Vu CThe Honorable Cathy Green,MayorCity of Huntington Beach2000 Main Street nln, Beach Hin-itington Beach,CA 92648 Y Cau�cu OFFICE Re Huntington Beach Desalination Project Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) State Clearing House No. 2001051092 Dear Mayor Green CaIDcsal is a non-profit that advocates for groundwater and seawater desalination to help meet California's water-supply challenges CalDesal has reviewed the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the proposed Huntington Beach Desalination Facility Our comments are focused specifically on state law as it pertains to the project's proposed operation as a stand-alone facility using the Huntington Beach Generating Station's(HBGS)existing cooling water system Our comments are in direct response to the project's description in the SEIR as well as a misunderstanding on the part of opponents of seawater desalmation regarding the permitting and regulatory requirements for desalination facilities in the state of California. On May 4,2010, the State Water Resources Control Board(SWRCB)adopted a Water Quality Control Policy ("OTC Policy")that establishes technology-based standards to implement the federal Clean Water Act section 316(b). For all intents and purposes,the adoption of the OTC Policy will prohibit in the future a power plant's use of seawater and the application of the Once-Through Cooling technology Section 316(b)and the SWRCB's related OTC policy apply specifically to cooling water intake structures used by power plants and do not apply to the operation of seawater desalmation facilities The SWRCB's OTC Policy correctly recognizes that seawater desalmation facilities and power plants that use once-through cooling technology have different operational characteristics (e.g,water intake volumes and velocities and discharge temperature and salinity) In addition,power plants are viewed by state regulators differently than seawater desalination in terms of the application of`Best Technology Available"(BTA)for the minimization of environmental effects,because the use of seawater is secondary to the primary purpose of power production whereas it is the primary purpose of desalinated water production.For these reasons,the Item 4e e Page 156 -212- Page-2- SWRCB determined that the OTC Policy does not apply to seawater desalination facilities and no such inferences should be made. Unlike power plants,desalination plants are regulated under the Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act, California Water Code Section 13142.5(b),which states as policy that new industrial facilities using seawater for processing must use the"best available site,design,technology and mitigation feasible to minimize intake and mortality of marine life". For example, the Carlsbad desalination project,the first large-scale(50 Million Gallon per Day capacity) desalination facility permitted in the state,has successfully undergone a review under State Water Code Section 13142.5(by In this case,the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board ruled that the desalination facility,which also takes advantage of a power plant's existing seawater infrastructure,is using the"best available site,design,technology and mitigation feasible to minimize intake and mortality of marine life" The Carlsbad project provides important legal and regulatory precedent for the evaluation of the Huntington Beach protect. The Huntington Beach desalination plant's location and use during future stand-alone operations of the power plant's seawater intake and outfall facilities is not only permissible under state law,the SEIR correctly finds that it is environmentally superior to development at an alternative location or to the construction of beach wells or a seafloor infiltration gallery. Opponents of seawater desalination wrongly espouse the belief that beach wells or seafloor infiltration galleries are the BTA for desalination plants However,in addition to being environmentally inferior,the SEIR also concludes that an alternative seawater intake system is technologically infeasible for this site. It should be noted that there are over 8,000 reverse osmosis desalination plant's operating around the world today producing 10 billion gallons of drinking water per day. There are no large-scale—20 MGD or greater-RO plants that use subsurface intake systems due to technological constraints Beach wells and infiltration galleries have proven to be technology feasible for smaller facilities under 15 MGD capacity depending on site-specific conditions Moreover,the California Coastal Commission,through its jurisdiction under Coastal Act Sections 30230 and 30231, determined that for the Carlsbad desalmation project there are no-feasible or less environmentally damaging alternatives to using a power plant's existing intake system Specifically the Commission found that " . slant wells are infeasible because the water quality available from such intakes would make it difficult, if not impossible, to treat for desalination purposes, and that the construction impacts associated with this alternative render it environmentally inferior to the proposed project.. . an infiltration gallery is environmentally inferior to the proposed project because this alternative would disrupt public access to marine resources, require frequent dredging, and would require the destruction of 150 acres of coastal habitat, and that the alternative is economically infeasible"i 1 Page 7 of 133 of the Approved Fmdmgs for the Carlsbad Desaimation Project(W4a-8-2008) -213- Item 4. - Page 157 Page-3- One site-specific example of why the re-use of the HBGS' seawater intake and outfall infrastructure is the environmentally superior alternative is the existence of a horizontal velocity cap supported 5 feet above the opening to the seawater intake pipe. The velocity cap is an example of the Best Technology Available(BTA) for avoiding impingement of marine species. Studies on the effectiveness of the HBGS'velocity cap have shown impingement reductions as high as 90 pereent2 Furthermore, under stand-alone operations, the desalination facility would reduce the volume, velocity and the temperature of seawater compared to the baseline condition of power plant operations. As a result,under stand- alone operation the project would result in an estimated average daily impingement of less than one pound per day (less than the daily diet of one brown pelican) and would entrain only a small fraction of the larvae (0.02-0.33%)of the source water populations. CalDesal finds that the SEIR prepared by the City of Huntington Beach provides a comprehensive and far- reaching environmental review of the proposed desalination project The conclusions reached in the SEIR that the stand-alone operation of the desalination facility will have no significant impacts under CEQA and that there are no environmentally superior or technologically-feasible alternatives are accurate and defensible under state law. CalDesal urges your support for the Huntington Beach Desalination Project and respectfully request that you certify the SEIR at your earliest convenience Sincerely, Charles E Shaw General Manager cc: Huntington Beach City Council Ricky Ramos,Planning Department 'Water Quality Control Policy for the use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling, Final Substitute Environmental Document(SED pg 100) Item 4. - Page 158 -214- 05/25/2010 TUE 10. 28 FAX 0001/001 2185 RAYBURN ROUSE OFFICE BUILDING FOREIGN AFFAIRS WASHINGTON DC2051"540 (202)225-411, UNITED STATBS subcommu es FAX(202)226-0335 Ranting Member Tcrronsm Nonprohleranon and Trade 1110&CHAPMAN AVENUE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Asia,the Pacific and SUITE 207 the Global Environment ORANGE CALIFORNIA 92866 Middle East and South Asia (714)744-4130 FAX (714)744-4056 FINANCIAL SERVICES Subcommittees www roycn house gov Capital Markets Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterpnses Financial(nstnutrons and Consumer Credn loicniational Monetary Policy and Tra& EDWARD R. ROYCE Fortieth District-Callforma April 14,2010 The Hon John Chiang Chairman State Lands Commission 100 Howe Ave, Suite 100 South Sacramento, CA 95825-8202 Re- Huntington Beach Desalination Project Right of Way Lease i represent thousands of Orange County residents in the cities of Fullerton, Stanton,Cypress, Buena Park,Anaheim,Orange and Placentia While-these cities in my district have access to local ground water,they are still about 50 percent reliant on imported water Orange County needs a more secure locally-controlled sustainable water supply With the water crisis we're currently facing,it is imperative that Southern California become more self-reliant and develop new water sources Through a public-private partnership that will not put any taxpayer dollars at risk, Orange County has the chance to reduce its need on imported water through the construction of the largest seawater desalination facility in the Western United States. This water purification project will provide Orange County with eight percent of its annual drinking water supply,which will serve about 30C�000 residents Perhaps most importantly,this project will relieve the growing pressure on the delta and protect both environmental and agricultural needs by freeing up that imported water for other uses Not to be underestimated,this desalination project will also create more than 2,000 construction jobs, which our state sorely needs at this time On behalf of my constituents, I support the water purification project and hope that you give it your full and fair consideration. Sincerely, VIA ED WARD R ROYCErDt �215� Item 4. o Page 159 cc: Vice Chairman Dr William A. Burke Orange County Chair Patricia Bates Commissioner Ben Hueso Orange County Vice Chair Janet Nguyen Commissioner Steve Blank Orange County Supervisor John Moorlach Commissioner Steve Kram Orange County Supervisor Bill Campbell Commissioner Khatchik Achadjian Orange County Supervisor Chris Norby Commissioner Sara Wan HB Mayor Keith Bohr Commissioner Mary Shallenberger HB Mayor Pro Tem Cathy Green Commissioner Mike Reilly HB City Councilman Gil Coerper Commissioner Larry Clark HB City Councilman Don-Hansen Commissioner Patrick Kruer HB City Councilman Joe Carchio Commissioner Dave Potter HB City Councilman Devin Dwyer Commissioner James Wickett Ms Katie Coates-Ageson Commissioner April Vargas Mr Brian Lochrie Commissioner Dan Secord Mr Scott Maloni Commissioner Adi Liberman Commissioner Sharon Wright Commissioner Steve Kinsey Commissioner Brooks Firestone Commissioner Suja Lowenthal Commissioner Deborah Schoenbaum Commissioner Mike Chrisman Commissioner Karen Scarborough Commissioner Paul Thayer Mr Tom Luster Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Assembly Speaker Karen Bass Senate President Pro Tem Darrel Steinberg U S. Congressional Representative Ed Royce U.S. Congressional Representative Gary Miller U S. Congressional Representative Ken Calvert U S Congressional Representative Dana Rohrabacher U S. Congressional Representative Loretta Sanchez U S Congressional Representative John Campbell State Senator Tom Harman State Senator Mark Wyland State Senator Muni Walters State Senatoi Lou Correa State Assemblyman Jim Silva State Assemblyman Van Tran State Assemblyman Jose Solono State Assemblyman Chuck Devore State Assemblyman Curt Hagman ' State Assemblyman Jeff Miller State Assemblyman Mike Duvall State Assemblywoman Diane Harkey State Assemblyman Tony Mendoza Resin 4. a Page 160 -216- -217- Item 4e - Page 161 e•r 3 e i +v �1 9 e 00 0 . � .•� '� � `'�3,F� -���`�' .��,� w���. �k � h ,; -". ,�r> z>� � ,+ ;a'� �„ ''g e� z Viz; �i w—` x v .. � � � �,._ 3 .9' ° w 4>a� ,a '"''>9 Y�q< r * y5s v '�.,;,,z �'� ,a��'�a:s � � n '� ,�'�. f'✓ ��, f w� '�p>'a% "t: � �`� -'a • �' .rd � d?,. � � ��"anY•.�`tRr. a �• .� a s,.%s' ��'_:�� � '"�-� '�`... ��GP ,� �-��� ".. ,. � s � �- `� c. r'�`-t"'° `� � »� e�� ��k t;'� �.� ��t�a'. ^� s''�,s�" 'x'y � �•-�f '�.`�"a` '�":`"� �. �§�> ,�, R^5�•� }�4 �_ ,� � �':,:,, a� ' �s,� �� '�" j. r q,•'�.., F y ��+ � d. .?p c /dl.r k. /�" 1,"58• y.'<"�� �t r. �� � �k � ',�r� 4s�§ � ,�.:� �', ,.;;a°' ,k.>�f' i §"'' / �. v� r tr�r S 3� e a' ;`x>.. +,�,§ _ s t�.� a-.,J'a-; ? ,^n "'v'�,+"'- 3-v t -��� ^�% � 5-�.. °vim, �r •::.,. �. ��,. �' � ,'� § ,�' "fir ,�< a, � a• m < , sa s- .:`t t.,.:.� ,e-g-=%= F' Lav,- ,trtY9. Fs � a" -,,. .,�+dam. x,,r.,.,_„>7 ;. ,- �{s -. .: 7-_ v_ <�' 'F�'` ��T 4 `^ :. M.'�'S- r. «r u sr `;:v. x;.� 'rC a",?' ;:-i s ,�e b fs e r z ,. ..Fw, b> - -tv ,r ,r o o,, a u 41 � r .ti-:., c., -- o-r. .;.. �, r .•.. .. ,r ,,,. ., :,. ., '�,. tj'v „s�,.l 3s t>�f, �, a �.' � 8n' ,a aA� a ., >: �••� e '�:.:< t ,.�. z,s'as>.>§sxY. '.: �'tv"1. �. '.�,.,... �, n'°' x ,fiva�-.Rpp, t».: �vem zR sa El us eRA � `t k:`„, H \, .., r '-r. ,: ,.�f�. . ,.. ,..-...r.. v ,. :1� x �... „h`as...: .:�.,',sass.-. ,, ,:>�i- ,,:.,., 3,t"��z ,.. ,,;*> .<..,',s �`t+ a ,, i �3 ..,� sue•, s ^ N .r x ✓c" -*`+:a �KYh FZ•:, .. •. :,: r .v,.:_, 5,?n! ��✓'•._- .Pr,.s _.,+ .. -..x s5. ::- � s tits' � � .,tertlRt, .... ..:;:a�. ,t'"`•a,.... .,r:,�.,�' r ..,.;, -:, y ?r'^` 3 :s.r.- ,:,., ,t. -e >.:. ,>e F:1� .f ....a•/R 3xX>,a :., '.........,. a.>� .. ,d riyx .:. , .'. 'V'i'iuIf ,,,,,g' .. , /.?"t K ,.✓,w` 'dy d ,¢ � y, vTxC.,.. -.,p.. ,,. a'd ;;� ,R: �> �' e'3,. {u�"�? {{ � � V° `�pSJ - Pi '�v< a4lm 11V 3., f �-;Asa a�v -rFr. �� §a�� r �.,�� �,��, r� rx. ,a,<,,, .�,. • �L .r f.. -��Y'y� °k' � i' n At t,;, z<;'� ,5� .�>��.. ,p,.,,.. 'a ;Pwi y •z. f.., v§tee,x✓y /y -*x t y a>>s:; a Ps' �s s .s. i,1 n a ey u,•.:. ,y - � ��`` �, v b Y�: �,t% n > � > `�rFY,�ir ff'. vT � .��� r4 d s f �`�s+�' qt.r mc`.tr<'ar'�' �• ;• 5 > ' � �� ✓ulk✓�ct?.np,.Cr,�� ,.� � � `` fl� 9 ita,;�3�Y 1 a 'S< �� .- vm7- _ -s&dc� A�i k F`3� - _ -,a a"Ps?< =^: ' ti c � ;•�� �� ,,,tea"'�ysxi � '�xt �� �. s a a, � ,sg � � � %'' 1 a" • � >r ,��' ... N,�g �, ,si> ��T �,'�rz �-, �,; '�', � � .ram: �g t �» k " i :°'r �"�" �, '�' � a..`�'��'' r a ,.;✓,, Vie' �` €q� ���. ,� w„, 3�`'ur �. „!,. q st :. gp go ZAN 91F -�- 2 .� r' 'v Nb�i� �, C::� v"r.�`�"�, •� `s �y�'-w. sr „�r7 a,F Re` ;"�; s < , h � ■. s sx, '� t ,e>� .��.,ate,=, , �� d "'�, :: � c+�r ,k ^6 'z1 �, i �k t�.:.'R. T � y�. .�'f �' p•„` yp p e ..rr; '!,5 :,h �* .�.�.; u�i: � w�,•.. --ax<,'a.M :, k �$a ,, .._PT m" of t; key ■ ® .. spa `"- F �- v •"`.,, a y ',y ep., '� �r//y1,FY sk, '"�, ,ul r Y t ,* ,,i. 7 >., /„i>�`r `st/x's ', ✓,�.. �". :' S,ds i'a'e" p ° fi IF �z` t�. '' � ✓i�d/a ��£�:rx�. � m, �� 4� � '� �� � ^s>s8 �, a' - � � - � � �v �s a - t*'✓`m - lWMI, =; � Of ' `$i� : ,i�� � �a � � t s✓ '�.,-f�, 'e � �' �x `x a : r��� ro"5,>`"'a� I x'.. � � ,- , r a Oki y 9 PIN rd a.,: ' s," c a x�# r a- € >; r, s, � "r t. '<i<. 4- v ftr " g:.. 5 ;:£rk Qc, ,k. Y '€• a. �% tS� :3 J' y, d;, ` ';� _ ,� �s> ; > R i d , _. a,.n , �.,... .r,.. ..,.. ,..n,. ..:. ;,.,a .-z >, txv,.: r,y ,, -Y.,�Y,af.., ,/i✓ 1 ,-.,:. S' G Wb .. ...-: >t .__:� -Y; <«.r.�m ...-xa-, ,.v ,.: , r..«.-. <.« ... „i,,. .,,. a ,,,::�,. ,>w -., �;:G.. 5• %�Zqpm Na 't. ',. '=Y5 -y w � '� 3'd �«' :'�' 'K-��",,: , ;��r: ;-, ..:t,: ey � ,�, Y .,1 - ✓„ 4 ,'✓� °f 'k e T,k .: ..## a x '<sm[,. z s. 'e, al +.'4.. - :: x:<� ,,+rr s �^° .a:;.,r< s, .:�. •a w 's .e «r/ �2 e/ r , ;_.,rs, a R r ...r„' ..,.:� ....: ���. _`.� � ,�2-.... A ,.�,,f r ,�'a � ': 3■ �� ,:r;-.: '� fit,•.. � v �,�s,.r 3�- x I-am....' �� 1 •5 'aM�s 9'" r{� :ate' „ , s - , 4..,..,, s. r,. >'§: ;?.,:3. .,w, .J- _ -✓ .- .. ..,3.>„,....� ».x k ....T ,y, "a, �- b >:«;w H -n 5 r v.r. _£ �& ,_ ,. .4.v r ,u✓:m�.. .,h,.,- o� t, i' •Y,`,:;,. , x.> �''+x ;z) 3r' ✓' ,r,a-r., ,>..al��w',r s/...'�'�..�`�. .x,..y.,y';,�> k� .;-.a �„ �."r; #v,,�y�,r�„ v� k/ ,... ..r .. �. qy� mili < ?' •�. v n - �yan ,v`lr Of / ,Fi ^ri ?'. �'�x� -'Y`ft:rty �3`'.rrk �, F��� r v �`y y �43i;� -;,v }.. A.... 1 , rid r Rv ,>:„yy,: y- wJ ;rl� ,5+.' ''r-I, '3 sm;1 x. y sr�1,a,> %rs:' w> ///r/i,., �' k. x-,r„� y�� r/�a'a ,$•- .; �s �"" �,�Ys k� _t>�' "L" et a�`,�,/. ...... u.:;y,A r/s1/l ,ra /. a;: '3. f f T �: x 1 ,e ��` s✓ ,� Y,r k '1m' r: - Zr ✓ i�. a. �N „v "R a rj F f a q ° }'^" 1° v :g Fl�, / ON r"s '" - w45" r t fr � � a a� .+ ` �, ���-s� � � x� �'s t}z S �?; t, w ��`'€,�° m� ,�-� +r`d: fi ���" �cer ,a' e z•,.��. ,��r y4_.."�v3'`�r .r ,3-•4*�''���a`1�"���£ r�"a ?ft�`4` � �' _ k; ' �.�.,� ;r ` .ma's "'> v k � � � '. - � � .`!,�x''r^,j, {„� t � sad ,z�� �Z•s� 'x���� r' �m ,?����� � '� .�,� �21, "A MS I - s a �J $��x � r < �,�? >4+� ,sg a, :��. "� t§ y m s a f ` ?✓� 3 a V r 4 ,;`,Ui;„.rdx'2, ^'� ,x'ax,. :• �� ^� ,. ,,'���,..'. w �.,a'rt z {„� `�^ '� i ,- �'ixta „a s z�'hf.- '4$x.(,ai t �, '<z i' ,s,:S� a ;..,'�f n:".-: y,.-', .i.F F,,k,. i•1� `s to >� ..N, � � 4` � Y� ,,4;. S,. uiri. Sh' C -m •$ f �,s a. 6 .-n,:x v r a...x, <, v^. e r'`':.r,;�;4b� x .,.-,s .six,,.:�,- �:� .. ,•., % t � ,� q.. ,'.. .. 9 l ^ G. >»,�, ^,>„ .,s,:., ,a fw` ia.e�},.,:. 9`r:>#;,'�'� -- u„ <M'�-r. a ,„ � r ,,, ..: $�' rw - �'F .+ ta•,,. ,:': .:- .,�,� ;:xa -.<, !.. <m, x, .„ a _.,e �..,,x•�. �.. � s`�.. � :. ::tea =•° ;4a ,,:�z..:r ., ,d.. �4xr ,+d.. �h,. � ,:.t"`� rz a rF r; e 4,; •y@ :X�r x.H ,� ,:,, .. ,,... .... ,, r ¢.,x. a = :,y •,,..,. "7'.<oa a,+o .:., d ..a ,yr,: �'z^za { s' i"�' ,,;n-.. .z,,:.,:.� �..,,,� a .• �,'r '� z-,,,� „ .� ��. .:u:. ,r �.. �:d � ym' i3',:�a 'x:'& ,um,. � T�'�,Y�., � �'< .a,; ,y':: 4 � ,. ; .,. ,. •:TF. ,.£ r y ^,>e a, ,,.; <- ": ° y 4 z Y� y �,' �.w,. .;�, (� •;¢_, n? .,,r ��! "G" �,n 3��' •,...,� ,-u` �:,,r9 E�, �;,;' � g 'Mj ,R£ agax §t ! k,-�� x� `"�:§",, a>��y x t. ��"�,`r ,,,��� w. '%x :w' t �s'�'•�"M i",- fi fir, �, >e.. r,'^% • ,k„ ;? N�.�� +u ` x"c d' ';d ' '_ fir`; ' r.. a 1 y. S � '�..:. '� '' EF� I ,R� A,' ff �` pips R �$•,n a� � J✓;. 4 nt?z �`'u f 'tm � ,a% ?';• x � .�gFr av �#a mr"' k,d y,' + x �, r Ville 3 a. r• - y x a, „C R }., � ara Fti` 'yr' �,� !�' 'M.' �s•;:i Yis+zxmF a!„ } r,�, rr 1?'.�..,. of J ,>te. a„ ''�M•w �..�.. ai, ,.,� ,1 3 + ft; � s:>r ;=st ry t_ „7,r,N,Sx.. m "ax•..,.,: r* .y a s r r r "'�' ."�•H JkF�s '�*i � �'- 3 :.,.r6✓ +Yd`£, ,a ...sm--<.: a " .�'n.v. , S ,.- .fv, „ x.::,��. -t ✓4' \„y s.. ,. ,. ., E :s?,,.:- ��F i ,.. Gk+, . ,,. ,�..'.i* �� V k� f?',:,. � Y..:.� ,..a �,: zx 'yY,%^�,, ,,� ..rr, �l ,i>✓a< , � o -.. �'2 ,-; � .. .,.. -,,..,.. rn,,, � $j] F., ,:� fi � `d a. xu >s ,✓ -� ', 6. c'a, � ,Xe4' �`I�� � ;xi �*'•, C a:.Y'a€.. e r�'' 1�+'" 'Ys :, a ✓�, y § ,�. '��� ,z`r }�x.'8R. � [,�~` J' Ys ..*r s,,.,; q r �;.: ..,„,.::� $,.'•,e: .x:�. Yki'I'��4 <,. '.., 4 ..yam �Ytx ..i...,i1e. > - r .,' 'v,s'a AN M 41 (/'1� F .,kl {. .i'S U l•f s b 'krs5 a:.�, y;3u /tx .�,'ev FY� :✓'x- -� >y'- y is i � 'Sass ;.' ,'�- r� x•Yr i,. l�•.,,` Z,;: F Ta;.., ^szsy' s„ �, cr ,3.: / ✓r- vs s? t, ;�.�S;,,osAr �:, ' .� P`,/ �, �' �,x ) y <Y "� -�`�"�• 3 ,,: -s�' ,s, '' "' `-ems?ys!t !�"�. ?Y'' „„rr �' ;Air 6 •'xZ, z';, ri"'4 .'a .. .`1? S'P ✓Y'• .,%s`zvs z A 3t: r 5v sx" 1ON-, x 1.`.�� ':_ s ;} ,m 4 v�">a `'D x"4�Srm ,: •" qa.^" d a ' ., Q s}>' ry a VJ v,§x ,„..- i37a - s �x "T� ' �'_� �'"+`� � �'x"'��J�� '"'S '`,,'� y tru��'�1'��.. Jr „fit J s � v, rr. �4�a �Y� �`�w'�a g'm -� �:"'`�� s°v x'�. k��a,��; � • ,�- - ,fit r-: s, '•z-9f t �' Our : Y A, A r . �MI, rt Y�• ,rt Mfrs �x 4 h ��� i x a "�' NO -as. st 'r a>•,_ w jq a L' rF7 ti e b,. < Y , F ,+h,,Kz 9 +t.,.,` -''.-s .G.4 6 "w ,�z,�.��1,"„<., ,.�,,. � '�kt�,--"_Y: -;�: �.%- ,tea' ^f'FL' :.�� �`-� '' Y ,Fcad '' IN k. ^„ f Ev. N h. r ' u* - r`A3 S 5 &3 F v ra`ia?z"Sgv - �. . .. w' ? EZA @ �S",s."'-r SST r.,. /, .., x. d ,SY,,. ➢ ?/. ,-n2, ,.. ,f 1:. y '?x#' „'A. a. �> ',':> ..:;d �e �C'�'��5 ^�➢,� �4..:. r �v,+•�, "Y""—... < r� tii vPr ,:. Uk " � „�.,, .::� � .� ssr ,�',x 9 erg,;:: _•;,€''a q'4 `fir., 's /, w ;5 'y,lZ, ' i-z t �.�-. p ,✓y Ev'� y �'' a /,_� f `_��" s � rr bad r;:t � „��. �, s <; G" x .§ a. : s F• t-r_-_, 'g3�.. rs. ay x, iA a_: p� `y ,Z ia , ' mw �K,\,Z i t� _ - �Sgtir,�w.>s a. / ��a✓=a ny - rz�' ,f�,v u � '�«s. �ryy,�� r "�a an y� �' � x, �'~>;• Mn �`�'�a x ,�: �ier^r,� x '-sue fy r I �� . sfwo s�M' ,.�' �X;r t � a ��`��'��' r� ■ �. �t"' ���,��,�;: 'fps '� k � �y x' �x z',,. !^�� ash��•. m�* �, �,°r� � a.g" `���' �' � 3 ���St �r� yz� �z � »r fi, } � S ': �y �.. ':. son W IT gyp"'. :;a"� qw 'Yr �.�� � ��n �,.� ��- `» �� �•a � »' �� V;, p 4 s >.� r � a 11 ��� ME y �i s a$�"�,•:'• ax ,; ;= - 6 �s �. ',',fit' _r F r a ` r w s; ti. "fi S' �Kts N .5"' �^'1 tq {1� p ..l A�' �' �3 p �. �#vy. �"�.. `5• `ti�?c. aA{ �Y'SY: -� �r � ■ • ,�f. i- �. „�� "� s r Bey; � y ,: z �:,: ,��r�, .a�,M.,,`a«., � � ?i� .� a '.da� s�,..k::;'� Sh'.^?3; ➢vs+� a `a TO All �`� � a :e«:�.r-. �� ;.■ ■ '•,3' � �"' f" �. �� ''�' a o t '�z ti"�3 �,rti`F ;.S 3 �';.� P zU, '"-'lY� FN' � �� ®® �®(}4 `�sm' ■[yY � �.� � 4. ��.�� � �,�� t 21, l i 'i �. 2 +rr.•3x; ,� v�i ��'� � s;�EY,K,b �.; rvt 5 G H 211 2G kAJIN' ,,gib a� �,:: � € '�➢ �' s. ,a € 'p E 3; �^ �` � 'k� i �fH, a �� J: - �f�n Ls�R maim MONa1 s s rss ra a s 7 a WNW, s � s � n A' zE a c_HEu0mva MAI Do '. ,,,, 4 -, ON Not oil .�5,x s� ' c�:: r �,, � :_ x 7�,�w wwwwe 3` S N ,,r� i z.- � d A 6''. - : TWA `r�'Fs''� 9��� ,� 3 � m,k t'� .� �-:' � � �?.�'s � •® ��,� xx� �x.�, � a�2�d' F is b e �a�.�.� 011 �s mm J�z c��VWe �\ w+ `� � ' NEW y � S 9S h 'cti A N��i� t��"'"""""���'.,''� �'_� U"�.,,�,,..d �,• � \��k'�� �>lf� �� �sue.,` j, �4 .� '+ x-k" mg z ALI i ..pill ��. I •. w^ / ^ s� > � )~ } !,. 2 va �. . i _\ \ a �a w r� Item 4, - Page 170 -226- COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED FOR AGENDA ITEM REGARDING A PROPOSED SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT BY POSEIDON RESOURCES (SURFSIDE) LLC LOCATED SOUTH OF EDISON AVENUE AND EAST OF NEWLAND STREET -227- Item 4e - Page 171 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 06 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson,Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:52 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Desalination project From: Yvonne Rothstein-[mailto:yrothstein03@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday,August 28, 2010 9:35 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination project I have been a resident of Huntington Beach for 27 years, I support the desalination project and encourage you to vote yes." Thank you for your vote Yvonne Rothstein 714 841-3942 Item 4. - Page 172 -228- Garza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday,August 30, 2010 3 07 PM ,"o: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday,August 30, 2010 7:53 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Proposed Desalination in HB From: Suzanne Beukema [madto:sbeukema@socai.rr.com] Sent: Saturday,August 28, 2010 10:16 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Proposed Desalination in HB Honorable Mayor and HB City Council Members, I am writing you to express my support of Poseidon's Desalination proposed project in Huntington Beach I live near the proposed site and feel that now, more than ever, we need to have alternative sources of water available) Besides offering in a new water source, Poseidon will be bringing in new jobs, and revenue to our city Thank you for your attention to this very important matter Suzanne Beukema 052 Christine Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-960-9197 sbeukemaa-socal rr com 1 -229- Item 4. - Page 173 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 08 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson,Johanna Sent: Monday,August 30, 2010 7:54 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW- Desalination From: Peter Evans [mailto:Peterevans@socal.rr.com] Sent: Saturday,August 28, 2010 11:17 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination I support the desalination project and would like to see a yes vote on the project Who knows what the future will gold and having an additional water source available to the citizens of Orange County seems like a common sense approach to the water problem Any problems with this problem seem like child's play when considering what our civic leaders had to do in the past to get water to Southern California and we need that kind of leadership now in protecting us from the danger of a water shortage in the future Such a shortage is already a problem in LA County, let's set a leadership example of taking a proactive approach to keeping on top of the water shortage problem and support the desalination project. Peter W Evans 17038 Bluewater Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92649 1 Item 4. - Page 174 -230- Esgarza, Patsy From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 08 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson,Johanna Sent: Monday,August 30, 2010 7:54 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: HB desalinization project From: David Hoskins [mailto:dhoskins@socal.rr.com]_ Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 11:21 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: HB desalinization project This email is to voice our support for the Poseidon Desalinization project Southern California needs a reliable source of drinking water in the years ahead and this project will provide both water and revenues to the City 1 -231- Item 4. - Page 175 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 09 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday,August 30, 2010 7:54 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Desalination program From: Kath [madto:kestrel42@verizon.net] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 11:58 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination program Dear City Council I am a resident of Huntington Beach, and 1 support the desalination project I recently learned that there will be a public hearing on September 7 Due to my work schedule, I am unlikely to be able to attend the meeting, so I wanted to voice my support via email I hope you will consider my opinion as you prepare for the latest SEIR Thank you very much, Kathleen Davis 1819 California St 1 Item 4. - Page 176 -232- Esparza, Patty From: JacobsPdette@aol com I ent: Saturday,August 28, 2010 2 18 PM fo: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Poseidon Hearing 1 am not sure I will be able to attend the hearing, however, I would like the members to know that Mr Palmer Pilette& I, Patricia Jacobs-Pdette support this venture We feel it is a time we realize we can no longer count our rainfall or the Colorado River to fill our water needs Our population has out grown our present supply And we sit on a massive amount of water-the Pacific Ocean As for harming the sea life, I see no direct harm I speak from the knowledge of a chemical engineer who predicted the gulf would adjust itself-and it did. So will the ocean if we borrow the water Respectfully, Palmer&Patricia Pilette Iacobsp►lette(o)aol corn i -233- Items 40 - Page 177 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 10 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson,Johanna Sent: Monday,August 30, 2010 7:55 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Poseidon project From: Jean KPG�pr rrnai1to:1lc!1er841@soca1 Sent: Saturday,A.jgust 23, 4010 10:42 AM To: CITY CCIUW('j� `i fe will try to : 1 _�thet meeting on the Poseic on project on September 7, 2010 PlaacP rain' _ , ,E as rBSirtants-t, , support ,h,g projegY 'Ii-""i a 'll, -'D V"1 Yll_ A 9264 3 . a5 Item 4. - Page 178 -234- Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky :ent: Monday, August 30,2010 3 11 PM o: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson,Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:55 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Our Vote for Poseidon Jrom: AMENRED@aol.com [madto:AMENRED@aol.com] Sent: Saturday,August 28, 2010 12:50 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject:Our Vote for Poseidon -Dear City Council, I have been in support of the Poseidon desalination project since first hearing about it years ago You have the vote of myself and my wife We feel it is necessary to have other sources of good safe water in these times of water shortages and possibly terrorist plots against water reservoirs ou have our vote, Dale and Virginia Nelson 2861A Coast Cir Hunt Beach, Ca 92649 -235- Item 4. - Page 179 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 11 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson,Johanna Sent: Monday,August 30, 2010 7:57 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Desalination Plant From: Julie Ann [madto:jamuzzall@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday,August 28, 2010 3:26 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Cc: Hart Jr. Subject: Desalination Plant Dear Members of the Huntington Beach City Council, I encourage you to vote YES and approve the Desalination Plant construction and implementation. It is imperative that we have a consistent and clear resource of water for Orange County! I live and work in North Orange County and I am a native Californian wh has watched our county grow beyond its water capacity. I am currently using recycled water (I call it poop water) and although I am assured of its purity, I cringe every time I use it. Please vote YES and support the Desalination Plant! Sincerely, Julie Ann Muzzall f Item 4. e Page 180 -236- Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday,August 30, 2010 3 12 PM o: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson,Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:57 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: From: DON PETERS [mailto:donpeters@msn.com] Sent: Saturday,August 28, 2010 12:57 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Dear Council Members: I write in support of the desalination project. It is past time for our city and county to address our future water needs With your yes vote you may take pride in your .oresight and wisdom. Not only will you have seen and identified a pressing need, but you will have displayed the courage to take action on it. Not much more can be asked of a public servant. My congratulations in advance. Don Peters -23 7- Item 4e - Page 181 Esparza, Patty From: KirkBRIM@aol corn Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 4 30 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Water project I support the Poseidon project and wish you would vote in favor on Sept 7th Kirk Bnmhall 1 Item 4. - Page 182 -238- Esparza, Patty From: Mason Truluck[rmtruluck@gmad com] Sent: Saturday,August 28, 2010 2 39 PM o: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Support for Poseidon Desalination Project Unless there is newly proven or recently exposed damaging and destructive environmental factors,we should absolutely approve this water purification project. R. Mason Truluck 16454 Harbour Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92649 1 -239- Item 4. - Page 183 Esparza, Patty From: Bruce West[ecurbeast@socal rr com] Sent: Saturday,August 28, 2010 124 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Poseidon Desalination Dear council members: I will be unable to attend the meeting on September 7,but would like to show my support for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination plant in Huntington Beach I am a long-time resident of Huntington Beach (over 25 years) and am proud that the City has recognized that, not only is it possible,but very beneficial to the residents to have the seawater desalination plant. I would suggest to the obtuse hardliners that are objecting to this project to refuse any benefits derived by the citizens; including fresh water to drink and nourish their cacti, as well as any monetary benefits to the city for schools, roadwork and other necessary projects. However,if it is discovered that any income from this desalination plant is diverted to the pockets of government officials or their friends and family I will join with the rest of the howling mob to throw the bums out. Thanks-again for doing the right thing Bruce West 6742 Gate Hill Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Item 4e - Page 184 -240- Esparza, Patty From: Matt McKinley[hbmckinley@gmad com] Sent: Sunday,August 29, 2010 8 06 AM o: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Poseidon Public Hearing Set for Tuesday, September 7 "We support the desalination project and encourage you to vote yes." This city needs every job it can get and the tax revenues. Best Regards, Matt&Dawn McKinley of Huntington Beach McKinley's hbmckinlgy@mail.com i -241- Item 40 - Page 185 Esparza,-Patty From: Tom Burrow[teburrow1935@yahoo com] Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 7 19 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Cc: Thomas Burrows Subject: seawater desalination huntinton beach facility I can not-attend he metting on sept 7 2010. however i do support the building of the desalination plant in huntington beach ca. thomas burrows 3496 windspun dr h.b. ca. 92649 & nbsp; 1 Item 4. - Page 186 -242- Esparza, Patty -From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday,August 30, 2010 3 15 PM o: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: DanHytrek@aol.com [madto:Dan Hytrek@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 10:48 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination Project City Council- I support the desalination project As a registered voter, I urge the members of the City Council to support the project, too It shows the Huntington Beach is responsibly planning for our water needs Dan Hytrek 16561 Kettler Lane Huntington Beach, CA 1 -243- Item 4. - Page 187 08/26/2010 1.11 PM FROM: Fax —TO:-17143741648 PAGE: 001 OF 001 David E.Hamdton 5401 Kendworth Drive Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Phone:(714)840-8901 E-marl• de hamtlionQa venzonnet _; ' J August 26,2010 City of Huntington Beach -, Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Attn. R.Ramos Via fax:714-374-1648 Re: Poseidon Resources Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report(DSEIR)- Dear Mr.Ramos, I disagree substantially to the published response to my June 9, 2010 comment letter on the subject DSEIR. (See pg. 12-W of Response to Comments.) Attributing the concerns I raised to a "typographical error"trivializes the overarching issue of discharge salinity(as does the obtuse verbiage on the conjunction"or'). If the discharge volume is Indeed 102 MGD,as corrected,the salinity level of the total discharged effluent will be 51 ppt. As a result,the official response to the second point raised in my comment is invalidated The discharge volume of 102 MGD when the plant is at full capacity will yield effluent salinity of 51 ppt at the discharge point,assuming the DSEIR correctly states initial intake salinity is 34 ppt Therefore the requirement to"Maintain a salinity level of 40 ppt at 100 feet or less from the base of the discharge tower(10%of the ZID)under worst case ocean mbung conditions"cannot be asswed. The worst case will be 51 ppt,not 40 ppt. Furthermore,the claim"under worst case"precludes nosing`wider average conditions"as reasoning for the additional commentary in the response Besides, even`warder average conditions",40 ppt at 100 feet cannot be assured. Again,these numerical amounts(values)are critical to other determinations of the effects the Poseidon project will have on the ocean environment. An SEIR should not be considered adequate until these substantive matters are resolved Regards, David Hamilton Huntington Beach Resident de.hamtlton vverizon.net Ph-(714)W-8901 Item 4. - Page 188 -244- Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7 55 AM ro: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item(notification) Request#6339 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Harvey Levin Description: I'm in favor of the Seawater Desalination Huntington Beach Facility. I'm asking the City Council to vote yes on this very worthwhile project. It will benefit all of Orange County as well as our city Harvey Levin 8566 Sierra Cir. #911-D Huntington Beach, CA 92646 _Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. 1 -245- Item 40 - Page 189 Esparza, Patsy From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01,2010 7 58 AM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6340 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Bob Fitzgerald Description: Dear HB City Council Members, As a resident of over 40 years in Huntington my family and I hope that you will-support the Saltwater Desalination project under consideration We believe it to be a necessary and prudent investment to our quality of life here in Huntington Beach. My family and I plan on attending the council meeting on September 7th to show-our support for-this project. Bob FitzGerald moxiefitzgearthlink net Have a great day? Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i Item 4. - Page 190 -246- Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11 08 AM o: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request_#6342 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Don MacAllister Description: Please approve the action item you have-on the agenda for Sept 7 regarding the Poseidon project. We need more sources of water andit will also help the economy of HB. yours, Don thewaterman Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email.Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. 1 -247- Item 4. - Page 191 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1 14 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Surf City Pipeline [ma i Ito:noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:56 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Notification of Changed Topic for Request#: 6339 Request#6339 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Jason Kelley. Request type: Comment Request area: Planning- All Reassigned Inquiries to Planning Citizen name: Harvey Levin Description: I'm in favor of the-Seawater Desalination Huntington Beach Facility. I'm asking the City Council to vote yes on this very worthwhile project. It will benefit all of Orange County as well as our city. Harvey Levin 8566 Sierra Cir #911-D Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note. This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i Item 4. - Page 192 -248- Garza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1 14 PM ro: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Surf City Pipeline [mailto:noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:58 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Notification of Changed Topic for Request#: 6340 Request#6340 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Jason Kelley. Request type: Comment Request area: Planning- All Reassigned Inquiries to Planning Citizen name: Bob Fitzgerald Description: Dear HB City Council Members, As a resident of over 40 years in Huntington my family and I hope that you will support the Saltwater Desalination project under consideration. We believe it to be a necessary and prudent investment to our quality of life here in Huntington Beach. My family and I plan on attending the council meeting on September 7th to show our support for this project. Bob FitzGerald moxiefitz@earthlink.net Have a great day! Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i -249- Item 40 - Page 193 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday,August 30,2010 3 09 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson,Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:55 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Opposition to seawater desalination plant From: George Mason [mailto:gem325@socal.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 12:03 PM To:CITY COUNCIL Subject: Opposition to seawater desalination plant Comments applicable to the Public-Hearing on September 7th,2010 To the Huntington Beach City Council We are strongly opposed to approval of the Poseidon seawater desalination facility proposed for Huntington Beach. This plant will: 1. Return no tax dollars to Huntington Beach(a nontaxable public entity will acquire the plant before construction is completed). 2. Create an additional noise issue in SE Huntington Beach that will add to the noise already emitted by AES. 3. Increase salinity in the seawater discharged through the AES plant to the detriment of local coastal waters. 4. Detract from Huntington Beach's stated goal of becoming a tourist destination. 5. Risk start of a development project that will likely not be completed as has happened to several other projects in Huntington Beach. 6. Encourage growth in southern Orange County that otherwise would not be possible without the high energy consuming seawater desalination plant. 7. Continue a relationship with Poseidon, a company that has already proven itself incapable of completing projects on time and within budget 1 Items 4. - Page 194 -250- 8. Permit Poseidon to state they are not using public funds while they beg the state and other public entities for financial support with tax free loans,bonds and grants. In addition,the list of benefits that will result from building the plant as presented by Poseidon are a complete ,ham, and could easily be disproven if only the City Council would examine facts instead of Poseidon inflated conjecture. Submitted by: George Mason and Charlotte Mason 21641 Bahama Lane Huntington Beach z -251- Item 4. - Page 195 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Huntington Beach Independent has been adjudged a newspaper of general BEFORE THE OTYtOUNOLOFTHE - circulation inHuntington Beach and Orange County by Deciee of the Superior s CITY OFHUNTINGTONBEACH Court of Orange County, State of California,under date of Aug 24, 1994,case NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, A50479 September 7,2010 at 6 00 p m in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the O following planning and zoning items VIRONMENTAL IMPACT PROOF OF REPORT NOSUBSEQUENT DESALINA TION PROJECT): Applicant Poseidon,Resources PUBLICATION Corporation Request. analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the ample mentation of a proposed 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project Location 121730 Newland (east side, south of Edison Avenue) Project Planner Ricky Ramos, Senior STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Planner ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 10-001/ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 10-130 (SEA- WATER DESALINATION PROJECTk Applicant SS. Poseidon Resources Corporation Request- EPA COUNTY OF ORANGE To amend Conditional Use Permit No 0 and Coastal Development Permit No 02-2-05 approved i by City Council in 2006 that allowed the I construction and operation of a 50 million gallons i per day seawater desalination project by revising am the Citizen of the United States and a the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project The resident of the County aforesaid, I am over project includes up to 10 miles of water transmission Imes to connect to an existing the age of eighteen years, and not a party regional transmission system in Costa Mesa Two off site underground booster pump stations and modifications to an existing booster pump station to or interested in the below entitled matter am a principal clerk of the HUNTINGTON would needed as part of this primary water transmission route Optional water transmission BEACH INDEPENDENT, a news line routes and pump stations are also proposed that would convey water northerly TPM To aer Of p p i general circulation, printed and subdivide three parcels totaling acres into ublished in four parcels facilitate the development of the p � project Location: on: 21730 Newland (east side, south of Edison Avenue) Project Planner Ricky the City of Huntington Beach, County Of Ramos,Senior Planner ICE IS Subseuent Orange, State of California, and the NOT ronmental Impact GIVEN ReportNohat 10-001 for Item attached Notice is a true and complete copy danc a was processed and completed in accor- dae with the California Environmental QualityAct that I em No 2 as was printed and published on the haveltawsgniifica environmentaltined effect would and, I following date(s) therefore, an environmental impact report is warranted The Subsequent Environmental Impact l Report is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Budding Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning and Building ; Department,or by telephoning(714)536-5271 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No 2 is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Entitlement Plan i August 26, 2010 Amendment No 10-001 filed on February 2, 2010 in conjunction with the above request to amend Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Entitlement Plan Amendment hearing (amending Coastal De- velopment Permit No 02 05) consists of a staff report,public hearing,City Council discussion and action The City Council's action on Item No 2 may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from the date of declare, under penalty of perjury, that the receipt of the notice final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245 32 foregoing is true and correct of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision l Ordinance and Section 13110 of the Calrforma Code of Regulations, or unless Title 14, Section , 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office, 200 Oceangate, 10th Executed on August 27, 201 0 Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802 4302, phone num at Costa Mesa, California ONber FILE c 5071 ON FILE A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Budding Department,2000 1 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public A copy of the staff ., report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerks Office on Thursday September 2, 2010 ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend g said hearing and express opinions or submit Sign evidence for or against the application as outlined above If you challenge the City Council s act m court,you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items Direct your written communications to the City Clerk 1 oan L Flynn,City Clerk Caty of Huntington Beach 2000 Mam Street,2nd Floor Huntington Beach,California 92648 (714)536-5227 CityClerkAgenda0 surf city-hb org Published Huntington Beach Independent August 126,2010 084 923 1 CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST Gila-WO. I0-001 1 1-P{6 tJo. Icy-not No_ 10- 13 L2 SLM ECT: w�sr -- DEPARTMENT: t'p N N t N G� 1 t tt U MEETING DATE: SST= CO +ACT: PHONE: S 3C.,-:5ce7.y N/A YES NO ( ) ( ( ) Is the notice attached? ( ) (X} ( ) Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council(and/or Redevelopment Agency)hearing? ( ) ) ( ) Are the date,day and time of the public hearing correct? ¢n ( } ( ) If an appeal,is the appellant's name included in the notice? If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language? Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? ( ) ( ) Is a map attached for publication? Is a larger ad required? Size ( ) ( ) Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? ' '7 Via-F 1 ��l tall N11 to 9T in S I N4 --r#A �oLt�5, ( ) ( ) Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) Are the appellant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,is the Coastal Commission part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,are the resident labels attached? ( ) ( ) Is the Report 33433 attached? (Economic Development Dept.items only) Pleas complete the following: 10 1. Minimum days from publication to hearing date 2. Number of times to be published 3. Number of days between publications 21 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, September 7, 2010 at 6 00 p m in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items ❑ 1 SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 10-001 (SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT): Applicant: Poseidon Resources Corporation Request: To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of a proposed 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project Location: 21730 Newland (east side, south of Edison Avenue) Project Planner: Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner ❑ 2 ENTITLEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 10-001/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10-130 (SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT): Applicant: Poseidon Resources Corporation Request: EPA: To amend Conditional Use Permit No 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 approved by City Council in 2006 that allowed the construction and operation of a 50 million gallons per day seawater desalination project by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the project The project includes up to 10 miles of water transmission lines to connect to an existing regional transmission system in Costa Mesa Two off-site underground booster pump stations and modifications to an existing booster pump station would be needed as part of this primary water transmission route Optional water transmission line routes and pump stations are also proposed that would convey water northerly TPM To subdivide three parcels totaling ±19 5 acres into four parcels to facilitate the development of the project Location: 21730 Newland (east side, south of Edison Avenue) Project Planner: Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No 10-001 for Item No 2 was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act It was determined that Item No 2 would have a significant environmental effect and, therefore, an environmental impact report is warranted The Subsequent Environmental Impact Report is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning and Building Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Item No 2 is located in the appealable jurisdiction of the Coastal Zone and includes Entitlement Plan Amendment No C\Documents and Settings\esparzap\Local Settings\Temporary Intemet Files\Content Outlook\EVZI IETS\090710(Poseidon) (3)doe 10-001 filed on February 2, 2010 in conjunction with the above request to amend Coastal Development Permit No 02-05 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Entitlement Plan Amendment hearing (amending Coastal Development Permit No 02-05) consists of a staff report, public hearing, City Council discussion and action The City Council's action on Item No 2 may be appealed to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from the date of receipt of the notice of final City action by the Coastal Commission pursuant to Section 245 32 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and Section 13110 of the California Code of Regulations, or unless Title 14, Section 13573 of the California Administrative Code is applicable The Coastal Commission address is South Coast Area Office, 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802-4302, phone number (310) 570- 5071 ON FILE A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday September 2, 2010 ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Joan L Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 CityClerkAgenda@surfcity-hb org C\Documents and Settings\esparzap\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content Outlook\EVZI IETS\090710(Poseidon) (3)doc od18/b9lS�anyaans olggEdwoa ww�g x ww gZ lewjol ep aUanbg3 .�- �✓Z ' S 1 t7-oor/�Yi (v-I 3 18/091g®tiantf 4l!m alggedwoa.919 Z x u l azis loge) I s President Ol Huntington Harbor POA Sue hnson 16 H B Chamber of Commerce P O Box 791 19671 Bay Lane 19891 Beach Blvd,Ste 140 Sunset Beach,CA 90742 Huntington Be CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Dave Stefarndes Orange County Assoc of Realtors 25552 La Paz Road Laguna Hills,CA 92653 ail � President Jeffr M Oderman 12 Pacific t Archaeological 18 Amigos De Bolsa Cluca RUT UCKER,LLP Society,Inc P O. Box 1563 i I 611 Anton Blv ., 4th Floor P O Box 10926 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Costa Mesa CA 926 950 Costa Mesa,CA 92627 Att.-Jane Gothold Sunse each Community Assoc 4 Pres,H B Hist Society Director Q Pat Thies, sident 1 C/O Newland House Museum O C Ping&Dev Services Dept. PO Box 215 19820 Beach Blvd P O Box 4048 Sunset Beach,CA 90 -0215 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 President Diane Ryan Bryan Speegle �j9 Huntington Beach Tomorrow HRB Chair O C Resources&Develop Mgt Dept PO Box 865 7701 Etna Circle P O Box 4048 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Juke Vandermost (> Co on Aging 15 Planning Director d0 BIA-OC 1706 Oran ve City of Costa Mesa 17744 Sky Park Circle,#170 Huntington Beactv,CA 92648 P O. Box 1200 Irvine CA 92614-4441 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 Richard Spicer 7 Jeff Me 1 16 Planning Director 21 P 0 J g v SCAG Seachff HO City of Fountain Valley 818 West 7th,12th Floor 19391 Shady H r Circle 10200 Slater Ave Los Angeles,CA 90017 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Je brell 8 John e 16 Planning Director 25 c/o E T rral 100 Seachff 41s4 City of Newport Beach 20292 Eastwoo nr 19382 Surfdale e P O Box 1768 Huntington Beach, 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Newport Beach,CA 92663-8915 Robert Smith 0 Lou one 16 Planning Director 2� Enwonmental Board Chair Seachff H City of Westminster 21352 Yarmouth Lane 19821 Ocean Blu Circle 8200 Westminster Blvd. Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Westminster,CA 92683 Planning Director ( Ocean View School District �9 HB Harn--pteas HOA 38 City of Seal Beach Atta Cindy Pulfer,Admm Services Progressive unity Mgmt 211 Eighth St 17200 Pinehurst Lane 27405 Puerta Real,AW10 Seal Beach,CA 90740 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Mission Viejo,CA 9269 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery05160/8160 09L8/09L5A9Ati aanz elggEdwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lewjol ap atianbI13 09 L8/09 L9®IVaAb glim alggEdwoo.8/5 Z x u L azls lagvi California Coastal Commission 25 Clark Hampton 3� S �Geldtng�mrcle 39 Theresa Henry Westminster School District Meaa South Coast Area Office 14121 Cedarwood Avenue 5161 200 Oceangate,loth Floor Westminster CA 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Long Beach,CA 92802A302 California Coastal Commission Stephen Ritter U Che rownnng 39 South Coast Area Office HB Union High School Disrict v Meadow a 200 Oceangate,10th Floor 5832 Bolsa Avenue 16771 Rooseve ane Long Beach,CA 92802-4302 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Huntington Beach, A 92649 Ryan P Chamberlain 2� 9/ //� Hearthside Homes 4�0` Caitrans District 12 6 Executive Circle,Suite 250 3337 Michelson Drive,Suite 380 —�,Q �(� — j Irvine,CA 92614 Irvine,CA 92612-1699 Director ? Goldenwest College Bolsa Cluca Land Trust 4 Local Solid Waste Enf Agy- Attu- Fred Owens 5200 Wainer Avenue,Ste 108 O C Health Care Agency 15744 Goldenwest St. Huntington Beach,CA 92649 P O Box 355 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Santa Ana,CA 92702 New wt:Coordmator 28 OC County Harbors,Beach Zi Bolsa Chica Land Trust 41 Huntington Post Office and Parks Dept Evan Henry,President 6771 Warne P O Box 4048 1812 Port Tiffin Place Huntington ,C 2647 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Newport Beach,CA 92660 Marc Ecker t2j9 Bella a Mall 37 Fountain Valley Elem-School Dist. Attn.Pat Ro -Laude 10055 Slater Avenue 7777 Edinger Av 300 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach C 92647 Dr Gary Rutherford,Super ® Coun View Estates HOA 38 OC Sanitation District 4? HB City Elementary School Dist Came Tho 10844 Ellis Avenue 20451 Cranner Lane 6642 Trotter D Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach 92648 David Perry 3� CountryV4,ew Estates HOA 38 Eric Pendegraft,Plant Manager (43 HB City Elementary School Dist. Gerald Chap AES Huntington Beach,LLC 20451 Cranner Lane 6742 Shire Circle 21730 Newland Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 2648 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Richard Loy ® Hun tnn Beach Girls Softball* 47 AYS on 56 47 9062 Kahului Drive Mke Enckso Commissto ohn Gray Huntington Beach CA 92646 PO Box 3943 9522 Smoke C e Huntington Beach,C 2605-3943 Huntington Beach, 92646 John Ely 4'L AYS egton 117 47 AYSO on 55 47 22102 Rockport Lane John Alm Co1ssione s Marlow Huntington Beach CA 92646 19961 Bush 18111 Brentwell e Fountain Valley,C 92708 Huntington Beach,C 2647 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 2 ` e ttiquefte de format 25 min x 67 min compatible aver Avery05160/8160 0%q/09 t5AaAd aaAe alggedwoa ww L9 x ww qZ leuu(4 ap attanbg3 e 09Lg/09tS0tiaAV 41im alggedwoo ugig Z x j azis laqul HB Coastal Communities Assoc ® Huntington Valley Little League 47 HB Field ockey* 47 David Guido Joel Groth Man"P dhiar 143 E Meats Avenue P O Box 511 1 17782 Me zler Dr Orange,CA 92865 Huntington each,CA 92615 Hunttngtc a Beach,CA 92647 Dow town Business Association 44 AYSO Refit n 143 47 HB Pop arner Football** 47 Mr Ste v els Commissio r Phillip Hice Paul Lo 200 Main Stree 106 5552 Harol Place P O Box 66 Huntington Beach, 92648 Huntington each, CA 92647 Huntingto Beach,CA 92615 I D town Residents Association 451 1 Fountain V [ley Pony Baseball* 47 North HB ccer Club 47 Ms.Man Germain i Chris Maho Ley President G orge Mitton 505 Alabama 21212 Shaw Lane 18601 Newl d Street,#94 Huntington Beach, 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Huntington each,CA 92646 Chairperson 4C H B.Jr All American Football** 47 Robmwood the League 47 Gabneleno/Tongva Tribal Council Randy Woo Dona Cardo a PO Box 693 P O Box 2 5 P O Box 138 San Gabriel,CA 91778 Huntington each,CA 92647 Huntington ach,CA 92647 Juaneno Band of Mission Indratis �i Huntington ach Soccer League* 47 Seaview I-Attlo i League 47 Aclachemen Nation Felipe Zapat Brian Semme roth 31411 La Matanza Street 18442 Steep ane,#3 P O Box 530 San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675-2625 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington E each CA 92615 South Co Soccer Club** 47 Ocean Vew ttie League 47 Westminster V e HOA 48 President M anon Phil Shearer,President 5200 Blackpool Road 8921 Crescent Dnve 18141 Bren ell Circle Westminster, 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 9 46 Huntington I oeach,CA 92647 917 West Family YMCA* 47 South HB G Fast Pitch Softball** 47 Gary Brown 49 Michael Tu Frank LoGras Coastkeepers 2100 Main Street 9432 Ahi Circl 3151 Airway Ave Suite F-110 Huntington Beach,C 92646 Huntington Bk ach,CA 92646 Costa Mesa,CA 92663 Regional Environmental Officer for Calif 50 Fort Irwin 50 Fort Hunter-Liggett 50 Western on Environ Office Lt Col.Paul Cramer Mr Peter R in US Air Force Director of Pu Plic Works Nael Training Cntr Duector of I ablic Works 333 Market Street 1 e 625 P O Box 105017 Combat Supl ort Training Center San Francisco CA 9410 -2196 Fort Irwin CA 2310 B790 5th St Parks RFTA Dublin CA 945680 Sheila Donovan 50 Patrick Chnsta an,Director 50 Gold Coast me 47 Comm Plans&Liaison Coordinator Western RegI01 L Environmental Office Rick Bauer- resident US Navy US Manse Co s Building 1164 20501 Surb to Lane 1220 Pacific High Box 555246 Huntington each,CA 92646 San Diego CA 92132- Camp Pendiet CA 92055-5246 South Coast Bayern Futbol Club 47' California Fu of Club 47 District 62 all Division 47 Manssa Hector Aguil Gail Harder 22222 Eucalyp Lane 10571 Davi our 17961 Scotia ircle Lake Forest,CA 92 Garden Grove,CA 92843 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 2 tttquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery05160/8160 0918/0915ObaA1 f crane aiggedwoo ww L9 x ww qZ Ietttx4 ap auanbq MMM 0918/0915®IGaAV qpm alggedwoa„919 Z x„t azis logei �,,&PCL4 -' '5pfF-P Cannery Hamilton Properties,LLC Chnstopher Herre,Branch Chief PIS,. 0'6N�IZ t psCoN Ascon Landfill Site c/o Tamara Zecer Department of Transportion,District 12 One Pointe Drive,Suite 320 3337 Michelson Dnve,Suite 380 Brea,CA 92821 Irvine,CA 92612 57qD &O M " GK1�SS� �+ oInlm3� Building Industry Assoc of South Calif Ma n"ronmenta' 17744 Sky Park Circle,Suite 170 6701 Cente ve West#900 pNl�-IG$-�1'IUP Irvine,CA 92614 1 Los Angeles,CA 45 �. j -� r Attu Elyse Sminada,Govt Affairs Asst Attu Shawn Gauer,Seca Planner j SEAL! p- AVE-L G��P�, L� gotn3-o kxwra uyx G?i �11Z-f+jd71� 5f31(v G+�� � Z� ! PU1•t111.16R� i 6 " -.),Z!>y(0 CH? Gb gc,(p'Sa— N"13 m j cop pas#) � C12 21U + -- G1°-11 K)"Plv- J?F-. ! 3-t'7 v MaNt o btz. Sul` 1N��fraJ t', Gp�12L44 H1411 1 ErT�1.l C_ G12(vtbb }�vltdt'lN 1' '� c 41Zto�-I�1 S53 i frit `T UJ • Lt-1 ul, l -117 W#"! 110l t te-p&P P'4'• �:Wal Oa NUt�tttJ�ti P -t�}-� label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery®5160/8160 �f AM3AV-09-008-L uoipnjjsui,p juaweWey3 ap suas p09L5 @A213AV 41jege 6 ai zesillin wortiane-mmm 9111na;el zalinsuo�j � �v / aa`ad a sal!3e}sauenbIq j 7 �c/ ID 376 APN 149-014-04 ID 454 APN 149-022-22 ID 232 AP 149-23 973- Willard Tolles Gpc3 Huntingt each n H Dis 10 Marquette Apt 218 1003 Vista Ridge Ct 1025 orkto ve Irvine,CA 92612-4205 Carson City,NV 89705-8044 t�ngt each, 646-2926 ID 262 APN 114-481-13 ID 529 APN 114-160-81 ID 452 APN 149-021-07 Charles Lourbe Regents Of The University Of Calif Robert A&Catherine Gingras 10737 Crebs Ave 1111 Franklin St#6 1122 Eichhom Dr Porter Ranch,CA 91326-2763 Oakland,CA 94607-5201 Ene,CO 80516-5403 ID 318 APN 114-481-06 ID 16 APN 148-041-06 ID 440 APN 149-022-08 Manna Valsamakis Francisca Salcido M And Cleta Keith 1130 Las Olas Ave 11461 S Church St 119 Cattle Trail Way Santa Barbara,CA 93109-2115 Orange,CA 92869-2601 Georgetown,TX 78633-4562 ID 497 APN 148-121-03 ID 441 APN 149-021-06 ID 166 APN 148-074-02 Tamutzer Family Maria Lorente i Judith Beauchamp 1320 Willow Pass Rd Ste 300 1505 Tahiti Ave 151 Kaimus Dr Ste B150 Concord,CA 94520-5241 Laguna Beach, CA 92651-1946 Costa Mesa,CA 92626-7955 ID 433 APN 149-024-24 ID 45 APN 148-044-09 ID 501 APN 148-121-18 Joan Klubrnk Salvatore Danna Nuboard Recycling Inc 1602 E 4th St 1617 Via Amba 1755 Park Ave Santa Ana,CA 92701-5118 Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA 90274-1232 Laguna Beach, CA 92651-2219 ID 104 APN 148-082-29 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 55 APN 148-044-19 Ali Malekzadeh Mills Land&Water Co Raymond And Jan Kang 19 Chatfield PI E 1920 Main St Ste 1070 2 Corte De Nubes Painted Post, NY 14870-9332 Irvine,CA 92614-7223 San Clemente, CA 92673-6912 ID 127 APN 148-086-33 ID 226 AP 8-012-11 ID 449 APN 149-012-09 Ronald Wilson Huntin each Union District Michael And Lon Monaghan 20122 Glacier Cir 20 Craimer Ln 20542 Paisley Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-4821 untingto , CA 6-5464 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6013 ID 246 APN 149-013-02 ID 13 APN 148-041-09 ID 12 APN 148-041-10 Sandra Hubnch Laura Gibson Michael And Susan Scott 20772 Skimmer Ln 21271 Lochlea Ln 21272 Banff Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6547 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6850 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6848 ID 225 APN 148-071-05 ID 196 APN- 148-073-01 ID 97 APN 148-082-22 Joseph Gallo Kimberly Preston Paul Goodwin 21272 Breton Ln 21281 Breton Ln 21281 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7128 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7147 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7001 ID 133 APN 148-086-01 ID 165 APN 148-074-01 ID. 96 APN 148-082-21 Scott And Deanna Johnston Allan And Susan Schaben Damon And Julie Smythe 21281 Seaforth Ln 21281 Yarmouth Ln 21282 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7038 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7055 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7011 T ® Tain;eaj lead Ase3 ao; teded paaj ®09L5�It�tdW31 p�anV ash ®091SpA�J3/\V i;aa4S uo1�3nt�su)aaS i s a e as Ase ® T , t✓J 5 Igll d 3 A113AV-09-008-L uoganalsu!,p / �uawa6sey�ap sua5 Q)09Ls(&AmaAv i!jege'6 al zes!(!;0 wor�(sane-m,A&m alima;el zallnsuo /�� ��� ,/ r. salad q selrse-;sauanb!i3 ID 224 APN 148-071-06 ID 132 APN 148-086-38 ID 164 APN 148-085-01 Ira Leibowitz Joseph Frolich John Galligher 21282 Breton Ln 21282 Sand Dollar Ln 21282 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7128 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7002 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7039 ID 195 APN 148-073-02 ID 66 APN 148-081-23 ID 197 APN 148-073-26 Elisa Wentworth Cheryl Toghia Michael Morton 21282 Yarmouth Ln 21291 Antigua Ln 21291 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7056 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7010 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7147 ID 98 APN 148-082-23 ID. 11 APN 148-041-11 ID 223 APN 148-071-07 James Bailey David Mancich Dolores Lukes 21291 Sand Dollar Ln 21292 Banff Ln 21292 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7001 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7128 ID 131 APN 148-086-37 ID 194 APN 148-073-03 ID 67 APN 148-081-22 Jillian Fabian Don Albrecht Crawford Family 21292 Sand Dollar Ln 21292 Yarmouth Ln 21301 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7002 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7056 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 ID 198 APN 148-073-25 ID 15 APN 148-041-07 ID 99 APN 148-082-24 Jack Bartel Larry Rialubin Earl And Suzanne Soderstrom 21301 Breton Ln 21301 Lochlea Ln 21301 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6850 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID 135 APN 148-086-03 ID 167 APN 148-074-03 ID 94 APN 148-082-19 William And Cheryl Tonic Peter And Riley Driscoll Gregory And Laura Carrow 21301 Seaforth Ln 21301 Yarmouth Ln 21302 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 ID 10 APN 148-041-12 ID 222 APN 148-071-08 ID 130 APN 148-086-36 Robert And Cathy Lindsey Terry Lehigh Thomas Whitherby 21302 Banff Ln 21302 Breton Ln 21302 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 ID 162 APN 148-085-03 ID 193 APN 148-073-04 ID 68 APN 148-081-21 Judith Schroeder William Speicher Harry Bremmer 21302 Seaforth Ln 21302 Yarmouth Ln 21311 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 ID: 199 APN: 148-073-24 ID 100 APN 148-082-25 ID 136 APN 148-086-04 George Schweitzer Michael Supple Gary Bartz Jennifer L Markle 21311 Sand Dollar Ln 21311 Seaforth Ln 21311 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7129 ID 168 APN 148-074-04 ID 93 APN 148-082-18 ID 9 APN 148-041-13 J Kaa Starling Jon Rogan 21311 Yarmouth Ln 21312 Antigua Ln 21312 Banff Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6805 T Tainjea3!aid A583 ao; ,sue sided p"AT @09Ls RVIdUU31 @AjaAd asn ®09Ls®AJ;J3AV i zeags uo!�nnsul eas ® CO slage7 lead Ase3 A113AV-09-008-1, uoipwisui,p / ;uewa6aey�ap suas @09L5 Q)AIHAV ljaege6 of zes+uan woxkaAe MAAM appal el zajjnsuo�q/�-)�� —��Q /D -/ - aatad a same;sa#1anbq. ID 221 APN 148-071-09 /ID 129 APN 148-086-35 / ID 192 APN 148-073-05 Steven Rakhshani Jeanie Boynton Thomas And Nicole Fischer 21312 Breton Ln 21312 Sand Dollar Ln 21312 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 ID 69 APN 148-081-20 ID 4 APN 148-041-15 ID 200 APN 148-073-23 Davis Ly&Ha T Nguyen Clayton King Grace Mc Coy 21321 Antigua Ln 21321 Banff Ln 21321 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 ID 17 APN 148-041-05 ID 101 APN 148-082-26 ID 137 APN 148-086-05 Carol Parker Rudolph And Cynthia Fnendt Donald And Susan Convery 21321 Lochlea Ln 21321 Sand Dollar Ln 21321 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6850 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 ID 169 APN 148-074-05 ID 92 APN 148-082-17 ID 8 APN 148-041-14 Scott Farrell Ahmet Aliyazacioglu Jeffrey And Tamara Olsen 21321 Yarmouth Ln 21322 Antigua Ln 21322 Banff Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6805 ID 220 APN 148-071-10 ID 128 APN 148-086-34 ID 160 APN 148-085-05 Grace Anderson Bruce Pulcini Kathleen And Peter Hamborg 21322 Breton Ln 21322 Sand Dollar Ln 21322 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 ID 191 APN 148-073-06 ID 70 APN 148-081-19 ID 201 APN 148-073-22 Donna Elliott Tull Taylor Jan And Barbara Varner 21322 Yarmouth Ln 21331 Antigua Ln 21331 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 ID 102 APN 148-082-27 ID 138 APN 148-086-06 1D 170 APN 148-074-06 Nancy Williams James Weepie Patrick And Louise Tierney 21331 Sand Dollar Ln 21331 Seaforth Ln 21331 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 ID 91 APN 148-082-16 ID 219 APN 148-071-11 ID 159 APN 148-085-06 Arthur And Cynthi Azpeitia James Larkin Cong Dinh&Yen Vu 21332 Antigua Ln 21332 Breton Ln 21332 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 ID 190 APN 148-073-07 ID 202 APN 148-073-21 ID 103 APN 148-082-28 David And Elena Hedlund Michael And Erin Karat Gary Smith 21332 Yarmouth Ln 21341 Breton Ln 21341 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID 139 APN 148-086-07 ID 171 APN 148-074-07 ID 90 APN 148-082-15 Lydia Fahilga S Smith&N Koch Wiliam Lamson 21341 Seaforth Ln 21341 Yarmouth Ln 21342 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 T Tainjea3 189d Ase3 a©1 Laded paaAT FA 009L5 9IV1dW3JL eAJOAd asn ®091,s®AU3Atf� }aags uo�pnAsul aes ® V l +� A1131 Y-09-008-L uOrpmIsw,p }uawaWey)op suas 009LS®AMAV I!aege*6 a1 zeswin wog A19ne•MMM a!pna}el zat!nsuo:) f��D ��-7�/� / 1alad a selpe;saUaZl}4 ID 218 APN 148-071-12 ID 126 APN 148-086-32 ID 158 APN 148-085-07 John Homan Yen-ping Wang Stephen Stagnaro 21342 Breton Ln 21342 Sand Dollar Ln 21342 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 ID 72 APN 148-081-17 ID 203 APN 148-073-20 ID 140 APN 148-086-08 Donald Russell Lourdes Biancardi Michael Tessier 21351 Antigua Ln 21351 Breton Ln 21351 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 ID 172 APN 148-074-08 ID 89 APN 148-082-14 ID. 217 APN 148-071-13 Michael Struckhoff Jason Truong Tracy Tnnest 21351 Yarmouth Ln 21352 Antigua Ln 21352 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 ID 125 APN 148-086-31 ID 157 APN 148-085-08 ID 188 APN 148-073-09 Joel And Shary Cass Dennis Kraus R Smith 21352 Sand Dollar Ln 21352 Seaforth Ln 21352 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 ID 73 APN 148-081-16 ID 204 APN 148-073-19 ID 105 APN 148-082-30 David Luther Dept Of Vets Affairs Of State Of CA Steven Wardle 21361 Antigua Ln 21361 Breton Ln 21361 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7003 ID 141 APN 148-086-09 ID 173 APN 148-074-09 ID 88 APN 148-082-13 Michael Kadau Michael Cook&Eileen M Duffy Darlene Hagan 21361 Seaforth Ln 21361 Yarmouth Ln 21362 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7013 ID 216 APN 148-071-14 ID 124 APN 148-086-30 ID 156 APN 148-085-09 Linda Tumquist Patricia Lalgana David Grover 21362 Breton Ln 21362 Sand Dollar Ln 21362 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 ID 74 APN 148-081-15 ID 205 APN 148-073-18 ID 106 APN 148-082-31 David And Patricia Bush Beverly Weisen Jerry Webb 21371 Antigua Ln 21371 Breton Ln 21371 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7003 ID 142 APN 148-086-10 ID 174 APN 148-074-10 ID 215 APN 148-071-15 Michael Ogan Amir Zaki Yong And Hyon Kim 21371 Seaforth Ln 21371 Yarmouth Ln 21372 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 ID 123 APN 148-086-29 ID 155 APN 148-085-10 ID 186 APN 148-073-11 Joseph Rubens&Connie Marten Todd And Alvena Johnston Ping Oey 21372 Sand Dollar Ln 21372 Seaforth Ln 21372 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 T P,UqYaan;eat!aid�se3�o� o� laded paaA'f 009LS 3.VUlAIIl @fdaAV asn ®o9Ls®JI�J��i�/® I ways u°!Pfu sui aas ® ® PAse3 AH3"-09-008-L wipw1sui,p juawa6jetp ap sua$ @09LS®AH3AV juege'6 al zespi}n WOYAEane Nuvkm apina}el za}lnsuNb��e) �� �� / ® Salad a salpel saUanbii3 ID 75 APN 148-081-14 ID 206 APN 148-073-17 ID 143 APN 148-086-11 Steven Kennedy Lucia And Randy Fletcher Martha Baird 21381 Antigua Ln 21381 Breton Ln 21381 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7040 ID 175 APN 148-074-11 ID 214 APN 148-071-16 ID 122 APN 148-086-28 Stevenson Family Bart And Lisa Barrett Gordon And Patricia Akers 21381 Yarmouth Ln 21382 Breton Ln 21382 Sand Dollar Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7004 ID 154 APN 148-085-11 ID 185 APN 148-073-12 ID 76 APN 148-081-13 David Dominguez&Hiroe Tsukamoto James Gnf6th Kerry Shaw 21382 Seaforth Ln 21382 Yarmouth Ln 21391 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7012 ID 207 APN 148-073-16 ID 176 APN 148-074-12 ID 213 APN 148-071-17 Georgia Ziccardi Garen Hanlon Richard Jones 21391 Breton Ln 21391 Yarmouth Ln 21392 Breton Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646 7129 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7057 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7130 ID 121 APN 148-086-27 ID 153 APN 148-085-12 ID 184 APN 148-073-13 John Cleary Norman Ehrke Manuel Cadiz 21392 Sand Dollar Ln 21392 Seaforth Ln 21392 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7004 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7041 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7058 ID 77 APN 148-081-12 ID 208 APN 148-073-15 ID 145 APN 148-086-13 Keith Belew Ronald And Glona Walter Lawrence And Stacy Beebe 21401 Antigua Ln 21401 Breton Ln 21401 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7014 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7131 Huntington Beach, CA 926467042 ID 212 APN 148-071-18 ID 152 APN 148-085-13 ID 183 APN 148-073-14 Arnold Rittberg Morris And Teme Spell Todd And Joelle Palombo 21402 Breton Ln 21402 Seaforth Ln 21402 Yarmouth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7132 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7043 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7060 ID 78 APN 148-081-11 ID 146 APN 148-086-14 ID 79 APN 148-081-10 Stanley And Lisa Bryson Steven Williams Walter Gunkel 21421 Antigua Ln 21421 Seaforth Ln 21431 Antigua Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7014 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7042 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7014 ID 147 APN 148-086-15 ID 80 APN 148-081-09 ID 148 APN 148-086-16 Jerome And Jennifer Boroff Gay Boyer Dolores Ellison 21431 Seaforth Ln 21441 Antigua Ln 21441 Seaforth Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7042 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7014 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7042 ID 483 APN 148-011-07 ID 316 APN 114-481-04 ID: 492 APN- 148-121-23 Mills Land&Water Co Reta Cagle Samir S Luke 21471 Newland St 21572 Oakbrook Or Current Resident Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 Mission Viejo, CA 92692-3014 21632 Newland St Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 T Tainleaj laad Ase3 AN ® Laded paajT ®09LS 31H'IdIN31®AJaAV asn ®o9Ls®A?J3/ii�Q I LaNS uO'Pfu4sui aaS ® 9 sia4el laad A233AV-09-009-L uo!pngsui,p ;uawa6ae43i ap sua5 009LS®A2l3AV;!.jege6 ai zesimn worfJane AV" alyna4 el za;lnsuo:) 0110 /� J� / ® ja!ad a se!pe;sananb!�3 1D: 467 APN. 114-150-53 ID* 467 APN 114--1150-53 ID' 467 APN- 114-150-53 Terence Nelson Cynthia Kelber John Andrews Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 1 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 10 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 11 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID: 467 APN. 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN- 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN. 114-150-53 Christopher Chartier Jerry Vandermark Kelly Vandermark Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 11 a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 12 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 12a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 ID- 467 APN- 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN- 114-150-53 Deborah Sine Rick Sine Jordan Wallick Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 13 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 13a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 14 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID. 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN. 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN. 114-150-53 Colleen Apgar Crystal Butcher Edward Cipres Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 15 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 16a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 17 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID. 467 APN 114-150-53 ID- 467 APN 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN 114-150-53 Elmer Smith Heather Newman Cheryl Dunlap Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 17a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 18 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 18a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 ID. 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID. 467 APN 114-150-53 Julie Grady Ronald Yocom Lester Elder Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 19 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 2 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 20a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7618 ID. 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID. 467 APN 114-150-53 Roger Byler Mary Baretich Nancy Agostim Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 22a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 23a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 2a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7618 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7618 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 ID: 467 APN. 114-150-53 ID. 467 APN. 114-150-53 ID. 467 APN 114-150-53 Deborah Bain John De Baun John Sturgeon Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 3 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 4 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 4a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 ID. 467 APN 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN. 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN 114-150-53 Laura Stenhouse Margaret Mcgregor John Leeman Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 5a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 6a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 8 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID. 467 APN 114-150-53 ID: 467 APN: 114-150-53 ID 245 APN 149-013-01 Linda Leeman Gmya Paasch Clarence And June Ballenger Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21771 Kiowa Ln 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 8a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 9a Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7833 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 T Yainiea3 laad Ase3 ao} waded p983T @09LS 31VldW310Aa9nV ash I ®09L5®A?J3A�da I ways u0i4lim4sul was ® 1 f p sla4el laad dse3 Ai13At/-09-008-L uoi naLsui,p ;uawaWeLp ep suas ®09L5 6Ab3"1!aege6 al zesinin worA�ane nnnniw apina�e�za;�nsuo�9/710 ���,Q /?� � �a}ad p salpe l sa�anb'i3 i ID 301 APN 14,9--012-02 ID 300 APN 149-012-03 ID 247 APN 149-013-03 Donald Zaleski Alva And Magali Battenfield Louis Kastorff 21772 Kiowa Ln Rebelo Veloso 21801 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7834 21782 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7866 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7834 ID 302 APN 149-012-01 ID 248 APN 149-013-04 ID 249 APN 149-013-05 Shelly Gaertner Mary Surprenant Donald Holmes 21802 Kiowa Ln 21811 Kiowa Ln 21821 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7834 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7866 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7866 ID 303 APN- 149-014-01 ID 304 APN 149-014-02 ID 305 APN 149-021-01 Michael And Jane Stracner Keith And Amy Seward Matthew And Angela Bellinger 21822 Kiowa Ln 21832 Kiowa Ln 21842 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7856 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7856 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7856 ID 252 APN 149-023-02 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 Vinton Marriott Cynthia Crawford Joan Ferragano 21851 Kiowa Ln Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7866 21851 Newland St Spc 10 21851 Newland St Spc 101 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 Richard Frazier Tanya Cantarella Jaclyn Willard Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 103 21851 Newland St Spc 105 21851 Newland St Spc 106 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 Valerie Moeckel Debra Bartle Anthony Caputo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 110 21851 Newland St Spc 112 21851 Newland St Spc 113 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 Michael Hiser Donald Moss Rae Berta Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 114 21851 Newland St Spc 115 21851 Newland St Spc 116 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 Yoko Harada Arthur Guevara Kimberly Slaight Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 117 21851 Newland St Spc 118 21851 Newland St Spc 119 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 Dawn Olmsted Merida Perez Marilyn Sammons Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 12 21851 Newland St Spc 120 21851 Newland St Spc 122 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 J Salisbury Rosario Roman Glona Medrano Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 123 21851 Newland St Spc 125 21851 Newland St Spc 127 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 T Tam;ea3 laad Ase3 ao; waded paa3T 009L5 3MdW31®A+and asn ®09LSOAII3/�dS i;aa4S uoi}�nAsul aaS ® ; E7 I' sia9el laad�(se3 AN3AV-09-008-L uopni}sui,p / Jua/6aetp op sua5 ®09L5®AH3AV:.iaege6 al zesipm uaori(Jane alpna}el zallnsuo� �j/'7��0 A — � aafad a satt�e}ta�arrbril ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 Christopher Tran Sandy Brown Ian Mccollum Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 128 21851 Newland St Spc 129 21851 Newland St Spc 130 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 Suzi Holland Nora Vanderkallen Charles Uy Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 132 21851 Newland St Spc 133 21851 Newland St Spc 134 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7615 ID: 470 APN* 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 Dona Patti Lora Walsh Patricia Porter Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 137 21851 Newland St Spc 138 21851 Newland St Spc 139 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 Frances Avila Peter Nisson Patricia Osuna Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 14 21851 Newland St Spc 141 21851 Newland St Spc 142 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 1D: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 Tatum Fisher Amy Barr Victor Hupp Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 143 21851 Newland St Spc 145 21851 Newland St Spc 146 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 410 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 Clarence Hallman Denise Manno Gilberto Tanguma Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 148 21851 Newland St Spc 149 21851 Newland St Spc 15 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7624 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Stuart Tedford Melanie Redd Christine Smith Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 150 21851 Newland St Spc 152 21851 Newland St Spc 153 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 Susie Freestone Bruce Stafford Michael Gallegos Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 154 21851 Newland St Spc 155 21851 Newland St Spc 156 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 Mollie Hill Christian Kraft Judy Frohock Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 158 21851 Newland St Spc 159 21851 Newland St Spc 160 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 ID: 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 ID, 470 APN 114-150-72 Andrew Chavez Amanda Boyum Andrew Mccaffrey Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 161 21851 Newland St Spc 162 21851 Newland St Spc 163 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7631 T Tain}ea3 1aad Ase3 a0} jaded paa3T @09L5 31V tdW31®iGanV asn 1 �09L5®Jl�J3/s1m® }aays uoi�naLsul aag - .� I Z slagel laad�ise3 AH3AV-09-008-d uoI:pru;sui,p ;uawa6aetp ap sues (DOM OAH3AV I.Vege`6 a}zesuan worAaane nnnnnn alpal el za;lnsuo �,Q / _ _1d♦ jeled a satnerl sauar&t4 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Tammy Lough Pamela Saunders Timothy Kuroishi Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 164 21851 Newland St Spc 165 21851 Newland St Spc 166 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7631 Huntington,Beach,CA 92646-7631 ID: 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 Frederick Marti Debra Ladouceur Jack Hastings Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 167 21851 Newland St Spc 168 21851 Newland St Spc 170 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 Rolland Blackiston Steven Vaughan Annie Wiggins Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 171 21851 Newland St Spc 172 21851 Newland St Spc 173 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 ID: 470 ON 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 Kimberly Beebe Christopher Ablin Canssa Bisnar Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 175 21851 Newland St Spc 176 21851 Newland St Spc 177 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN- 114-150-72 Jill Cheyne-roy Georgine Condon Donna Beasley Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 18 21851 Newland St Spc 180 21851 Newland St Spc 181 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7624 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 Dale Ackerman William Moore Danielle Defeo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 182 21851 Newland St Spc 183 21851 Newland St Spc 184 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN- 114-150-72 Arlene Baker James Buck Jorge Festini Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 185 21851 Newland St Spc 186 21851 Newland St Spc 187 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 Russell Christensen Thomas Sutley Shelley Brower Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 188 21851 Newland St Spc 189 21851 Newland St Spc 19 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7625 ID- 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 David Martorelli David Post Sylvia Davanzo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 190 21851 Newland St Spc 191 21851 Newland St Spc 192 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Errol Lord Scott Wilson Chris Roth Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 193 21851 Newland St Spc 194 21851 Newland St Spc 196 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 T 0 Tainiea3 Pad Ase3 aol jaded paaAT 0 @09LS 3IVldW31 O)uaAv asn ®a9�soA11�V® �;aa4S uor�ngsul aaS ® 13 slage-I lead�Cseg 11 Easy Peel®Labels 9/711L ♦ ® Bend along line to `- �1 AVERV® 5160® i Use Avery®Template 1660 l Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTM J /0 o 1 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN' 114-150-72 Erik Elstad Dolores Anderson Dan Wicks Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 197 21851 Newland St Spc 198 21851 Newland St Spc 199 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID, 470 APN 114-150-72 Jakub Rozga George Barker Juanita Wood Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 1 a 21851 Newland St Spc 1 b 21851 Newland St Spc 2 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 ID' 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN 114-150-72 Ikuko Miyagi William Raymond Teresa Greenfield Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 20 21851 Newland St Spc 201 21851 Newland St Spc 202 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7625 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Sandra Epstein Timothy Fitzpatnck Judith Beteag Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 203 21851 Newland St Spc 204 21851 Newland St Spc 205 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Rita Sadler John Trant Janet Boyle Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 206 21851 Newland St Spc 207 21851 Newland St Spc 208 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID 470 APN. 114-150-72 Diane Coulter Sharlene Boatnght Howard Freedman Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 21 21851 Newland St Spc 210 21851 Newland St Spc 211 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7625 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 Mark Molloy Eric Daniel Ten Harkins Rd Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 212 21851 Newland St Spc 215 21851 Newland St Spc 217 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 1D 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 John Paul Laurie Allen Lon Montez Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 218 21851 Newland St Spc 219 21851 Newland St Spc 220 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN. 114-150-72 Francis Brannen Charles Pena Bob Smith Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 221 21851 Newland St Spc 222 21851 Newland St Spc 223 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 Barbara Liscotti Johanna Meier Suzanne Sephton Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 225 21851 Newland St Spc 226 21851 Newland St Spc 228 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Etiquettes faciles A peter ; Repliez a la hachure afro de www.avery com (L+ l)tIhcP7 Ip aahar�t AVFRY 5760 Sens de ® ® _�_______� reveler le re6ord Pon-UnTM d 7-AOA-GO-AWRY 1 , Easy Peel®Labels i ® �®/�1$v® 5160® , Bend along brie to I S , Use Avery®Template 5460 Peed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeT"" /0—� ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 Mamie Duenas Elly Abadan Lee Gillespie Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 229 21851 Newland St Spc 23 21851 Newland St Spc 234 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7625 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 Jeanne Ferrara John Wendell Alice Mishica Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 235 21851 Newland St Spc 237 21851 Newland St Spc 24 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7626 ID. 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN. 114-150-72 Barbara Nelson Scott Spnck Mary Wright Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 240 21851 Newland St Spc 241 21851 Newland St Spc 242 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 James Campbell Laurie Church Jamie Haig Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 244 21851 Newland St Spc 246 21851 Newland St Spc 247 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 Doug Klaas Christopher Nielsen Kurt Hagan Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 248 21851 Newland St Spc 249 21851 Newland St Spc 25 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7626 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Kan Lavalley Mana Young Pamela Nelson Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 250 21851 Newland St Spc 252 21851 Newland St Spc 254 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Abbey Marks John Merrill Steven Woodward Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 255 21851 Newland St Spc 256 21851 Newland St Spc 257 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Mark Branco Henry Cargill Marione Ballinger Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 259 21851 Newland St Spc 26 21851 Newland St Spc 260 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7626 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN. 114-150-72 Lawrence Nye Linda Brice Martha Sullivan Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 261 21851 Newland St Spc 262 21851 Newland St Spc 263 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID 470 APN: 114-150-72 Sabrina Haycock Sam Salib Lucas Wimer Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 268 21851 Newland St Spc 269 21851 Newland St Spc 27 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7627 Etiquettes facdes a peter ; e Repl,ez a la hachure afro de; wwvv.avery com I Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51601 Sens de Tm , , �,, „+ reveler le rebord Poo-Up I-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel®Labels 9��//� i A ® Bend along line to ����'® 5160� i Use Avery®Template 5160 Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeT"' 1 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN' 114-1%72 ID 470 APN' 114-150-72 Krystalyn Franks Thomas Archer Thomas Pelk Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 271 21851 Newland St Spc 274 21851 Newland St Spc 275 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN' 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID 470 APN. 114-150-72 Larry Parilla Teresa Gilliland Nanette Barress Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 276 21851 Newland St Spc 277 21851 Newland St Spc 278 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN: 114-150-72 Debra Mendenhall Edwin Callaway Audrey Maratta Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 279 21851 Newland St Spc 28 21851 Newland St Spc 280 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7627 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN' 114-150-72 James Bibb Paul Sulzby Stephen Supola Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 281 21851 Newland St Spc 284 21851 Newland St Spc 287 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 ID- 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID 470 APN. 114-150-72 Cheryl Walsh Steven Vanover Julie Reyes Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 288 21851 Newland St Spc 289 21851 Newland St Spc 29 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7627 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN. 114-150-72 Vickie Flanagan Michael Sheridan Jeremy Loo Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 291 21851 Newland St Spc 292 21851 Newland St Spc 296 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Barbara Banuelos Susan Robins James Pittman Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 297 21851 Newland St Spc 298 21851 Newland St Spc 299 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 ID- 470 APN' 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN' 114-150-72 Karen Sampson Kyle Brown Charles Cook Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 30 21851 Newland St Spc 301 21851 Newland St Spc 302 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 - Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 Carolyn Dick Carol Leblanc Jeffrey Klauza Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 305 21851 Newland St Spc 31 21851 Newland St Spc 312 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 ID. 470 APN* 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 10. 470 APN: 114-150-72 Craig Eggers June Moore Pamala Clifford Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 315 21851 Newland St Spc 32 21851 Newland St Spc 33 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Etiquettes faciles a peler ; ® Repliez a la hachure afm de; www.avery.com Utilispz le nabarit AVERY®51600 i -`Sens de_` rev6ler le rebord Poo-UoTm ! 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel®Labels 9/�/� i ♦ ® Bend along line to I ' 1 ® AVERS'®sm(D i Use Avery(&Template 51600 / j Feed Paper ® expose Pop-Up EdgeTrA j �d ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN' 114-150-72 Franklin Harding Wayne Estabrook Barbara Howard Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 34 21851 Newland St Spc 35 21851 Newland St Spc 36 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 Henry Field Rebecca Crouse Vicki Schlom Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 37 21851 Newland St Spc 38 21851 Newland St Spc 39 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID- 470 APN: 114-150-72 Kathleen Millar Jonathan Tickenoff Stacey Lavoie Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 4 21851 Newland St Spc 40 21851 Newland St Spc 45 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7622 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 James Bertoni Tommasina Cirnto Jan Torrence Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 47 21851 Newland St Spc 48 21851 Newland St Spc 49 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Anne De Vusser Mary Massoth Jennian Beaver Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 50 21851 Newland St Spc 51 21851 Newland St Spc 52 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Louis Amerman Bruce Yelverton Vincent Hannan Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 53 21851 Newland St Spc 55 21851 Newland St Spc 56 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Mary Gnsham D Draghi Scott Mccall Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 60 21851 Newland St Spc 61 21851 Newland St Spc 62 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Bradley Likich Micahel Slaton Rodney Hansen Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 63 21851 Newland St Spc 64 21851 Newland St Spc 65 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID 470 APN: 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN. 114-150-72 Michelle Bibb Robert Johnson Vincent Vancura Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 66 21851 Newland St Spc 67 21851 Newland St Spc 68 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 111 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN- 114-150-72 Max Stimac James Meyling Linda Umbaugh Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 69 21851 Newland St Spc 7 21851 Newland St Spc 70 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Etiquettes faclles a peter ; A Rephez a la hachure afro de; www.averycom Sens de IItdIcp7 ip nnharrt OVFR rbvPipr le rpbord Pon-UnTM 1-ROA-G0-OVFRV Y A2l3AV-09-008-1, �� i widn-dod paoga�a!�aiana� ;uawsuae43 1 ®09LS®A213At�;!jege6 ai zasgi;n wow Ai8Ae-mmm / i ap uge ainyaey e!a za!Edes p V 5 k +711 aa!ad a sapel sa anbi;3 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN. 114-150-72 Janet Vincent William Trover Kevin Gassed Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 73 21851 Newland St Spc 74 21851 Newland St Spc 75 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID, 470 APN 114-150-72 Jan Deady John Mcentire Jana Reeser Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 76 21851 Newland St Spc 77 21851 Newland St Spc 79 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID: 470 APN. 114-150-72 Robert Lanshaw Kathie Hoffman Gary Herkner Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 81 21851 Newland St Spc 82 21851 Newland St Spc 83 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID- 470 APN. 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID, 470 APN- 114-150-72 Michelle Tallman Michael Zappen Cynthia Montgomery Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 84 21851 Newland St Spc 85 21851 Newland St Spc 86 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID, 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID, 470 APN 114-150-72 Sandra Snell Shylo Hight Bobbie Gardner Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 87 21851 Newland St Spc 88 21851 Newland St Spc 89 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID. 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Melva Burton Dallas Herrold Paul Morrow Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 90 21851 Newland St Spc 91 21851 Newland St Spc 92 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID- 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID 470 APN- 114-150-72 Mary Moses Laura Brewster Alexander Rocco Or Current Resident Or Current Resident Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 94 21851 Newland St Spc 95 21851 Newland St Spc 96 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID. 470 APN- 114-150-72 ID 306 APN 149-022-03 ID 254 APN 149-023-04 Richard Duffy David Nelson Richard And Cathy Svoboda Or Current Resident 21862 Kiowa Ln 21871 Kiowa Ln 21851 Newland St Spc 98 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7855 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 ID 362 APN 149-011-05 ID 307 APN 149-022-02 ID* 255 APN 149-023-05 Stanley Chen Mana Priddy Daniel Malloy 21872 Harborbreeze Ln 21872 Kiowa Ln 21881 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8253 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7855 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 ID 308 APN 149-022-01 ID 95 APN 148-082-20 ID 256 APN 149-023-06 Frances Martin Robert Browning Michele Erwin 21882 Kiowa Ln 21882 Oceanview Ln 21891 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7855 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8217 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 T F w,a6P3 do-dod asodxa ® jaded paaj r 009LS a;eidwal okmv ash 009L5 ®JIjJ3AV oz auy 6uoie puce ® 9-;, siege-1®iaad Ase3 A213AV-09-008-L 1 wsdn-dod paogaj ai aai9AW ;uaweqp i 09LS®AN3AV i!aege6 90 zasepin AhMM 9/7 ± sua ap u aintpeq e!g za!!da8 p 5 wor bane !;e i _)/ aa!ed e sap)e;sallanbg3 ID 485 APN 114-150-81 ID 488 APN 114-160-86 ID 257 APN 149-023-07 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Teresa J Lee 21900 Pacific Coast Hwy 21900 Pacific Coast Hwy 21901 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7835 ID 149 APN 148-081-01 ID 309 APN 149-024-03 ID- 258 APN: 149-023-08 Teresa Lee Brent And Janet Kooiman Kenneth Fomster 21901 Kiowa Ln 21902 Kiowa Ln Elizabeth C Gillett Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7836 21911 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 ID 310 APN 149-024-02 ID 259 APN 149-023-09 ID 311 APN 149-024-01 Kim Kellner Florence Howard Alan Bramlett 21912 Kiowa Ln 21931 Kiowa Ln 21932 Kiowa Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7836 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7836 ID 260 APN 149-023-10 ID 261 APN 149-023-11 ID 330 APN 114-482-01 Fares And Nabila Jahshan Donald Mckinney Mary Arnold 21941 Kiowa Ln 21961 Kiowa Ln 22002 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7837 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID 276 APN 114-481-12 ID 264 APN 114-481-15 ID 393 APN 114-482-17 John Graves&Kay Melinda Judy Lenihan Michael And Donna Tryon 22012 Hula Cir 22021 Hula Cir 22021 Surfrider Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 ID 314 APN 114-481-02 ID 275 APN 114-481-11 ID 329 APN 114482-02 Lisa Howell Kathleen Mooney Oanh Mai&Thao Ho 22021 Susan Ln 22022 Hula Cir 22022 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8305 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID 288 APN 149-031-07 ID 392 APN 114-482-16 ID 328 APN- 114482-03 D And K Coffman David Cragun Al Gabnon 22031 Jonesport Ln 22031 Surfrider Ln Julie Nevins-gabnon Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8422 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 22032 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID 391 APN 114-482-15 ID 274 APN 114481-10 ID 327 APN 114-482-04 Richard Mast Dorothy Riley Oliver Thayer 22041 Surfnder Ln 22042 Hula Cir 22042 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 ID 266 APN 114-481-17 ID 390 APN 114-482-14 ID 273 APN 114-481-09 Israel Reyngold Thomas And Catherine Mortimer John And Dana Ryan 22051 Hula Cir 22051 Surfrider Ln 22052 Hula Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 ID 326 APN 114-482-05 ID 389 APN 114482-13 ID 317 APN 114-481-05 Gale Hillis&Virginia A Hills Jeane Fleming Raymond And Charlene Cole 22052 Susan Ln 22061 Surfrider Ln 22061 Susan Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8307 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8305 T I Wla6p3 do-dod asodxa waded pa I 009L5 a;eldwal oAjaAV asn i ®09L5®AjJ3/��I o 01 auq 6u01e puag ® V i I s!age-1®iaad Ase3 A)DAV-09-009-1 1 widn-dod pjogaj a1 jalanaj ;uawsuaey� �®0915®AH3AV piege6 al zaswin uum�Gane nn'W ��� 1 ap w}e ajny�ey el g zalldaa p- s ; 2 / jelad a saline}sauanb'13 ID 267 APN 114-481-18 ID 272 APN 114-481-08 ID 388 APN 114-482-12 Kenneth Kimball Ellen White Susan Anderson 22071 Hula Cir 22072 Hula Cir 22081 Surfnder Ln Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8319 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8344 ID 319 APN 114-481-07 ID 523 APN 114-150-78 ID 189 APN 148-073-08 Leonard And Rebecca Lopez Cannery Hamilton Properties Llc David Sutton 22091 Susan Ln 2222 Martin Ste 255 245 Clipper Way Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8305 Irvine,CA 92612-1481 Seal Beach,CA 90740-5955 ID- 500 APN 148-121-19 ID 163 APN 148-085-02 ID 236 APN 149-031-24 H&Z Investments Llc Enka Nollau Warren Biscailuz Saghafi Hamid 2620 Cody Cir 28237 Sw Wagner St 25352 Hillary Ln Las Cruces, NM 88011-9079 Wilsonville,OR 97070-6784 Laguna Hills, CA 92653-5217 ID 522 APN 114-150-28 ID 459 APN 114-150-62 ID 387 APN 114482-11 Orange County Flood Control Dist State Of California Parks&Rec Robert Merritt 300 N Flower St#6 3030 Avenida Del Presidente 31886 Via Pato Santa Ana,CA 92703-5000 San Clemente, CA 92672-4433 Trabuco Canyon,CA 926794129 ID 369 APN 149-041-11 ID 33 APN 148-044-05 ID 65 APN 148-081-24 Kent'Roth Alejandro Arredondo Laverne Spence 32031 Via Flores 3218 S Deegan Dr 3300 Irvine Ave Ste 270 San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675-3808 Santa Ana, CA 92704-6615 Newport Beach, CA 92660-3111 ID 464 APN 114-150-58 ID 21 APN 148-044-01 ID 313 APN 114-481-01 State Of California Dept Of Tran William And Alicia Almeida Terence Boston 3337 Michelson Dr Ste 380 3375 Mangold Cir 3501 Jamboree Rd#301 Irvine,CA 92612-8894 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1724 Newport Beach, CA 92660-2939 ID 251 APN 149-023-01 ID 187 APN 148-073-10 ID 177 APN 148-074-13 Lee Hupp Wesley Smith Barbara Hennesey 35225 Linda Rosea Rd 3530 Damien Ave Spc 7 414 El Modena Ave Temecula, CA 92592-9531 La Verne, CA 91750-3207 Newport Beach,CA 92663-5113 ID 161 APN 148-085-04 ID 253 APN 149-023-03 ID 382 APN 149-023-16 Raymond And Carol Millard Lilly Wittman Amber Wagner 42303 Highway 200 4651 W Crestview Cir 5526 W Dorothea Ave Hope,ID 83836-9785 Tucson,AZ 85745-9207 Visalia, CA 93277-6414 ID 144 APN 148-086-12 ID 533 APN 148-041-51 ID 527 APN 114-150-36 Joseph Buszek Bonanni Properties&D S Products Pacific Terminals Llc 5607 Chadwick Rd 5622 Research Dr 5900 Cherry Ave Mission, KS 66205-2628 Huntington Beach, CA 92649-1633 Long Beach,CA 908054408 ID 526 APN 114-150-75 ID 29 APN 148-043-43 ID 498 APN 148-121-21 Cannery Hamilton Properties Llc David Oakley Arthur Bnmlow 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd 6251 Moonfield Dr 652 E Culver Ave San Ramon,CA 94583-2324 Huntington Beach, CA 92648-1039 Orange, CA 92866-2054 T �0915 pJltj�/��/ V w1a6p3 do-dod asodxa ® jaded paaj F 00915 a;eldwal®AjaAv asn o;auy 6uole pua8 ® ZD slagel®laad Ase3 T AH3AV-09-009-L i widn-dod paogaj al Jalanaa ;uawa6aey� � )�09LS®AHgAV zuege6 al zasiil;n wo�lGane nnnnnn i ap ul}e aany�ey el g zal}daa ap®as i salad a selpe;sauanbi13 ID 250 APN 149-013-06 ID 315 APN 114-481-03 ID 496 APN 148-121-01 James Wright Jan Downs&Charles Javer Fein Properties Lic 703 Concord St 709 N Camden Dr 714 Oceanhill Dr Santa Ana,CA 92701-3203 Beverly Hills,CA 90210-3204 Huntington Beach,CA 92648-3741 ID 71 APN 148-081-18 ID- 25 APN- 148-044-29 ID 58 APN 148-043-34 Kst Water Management Lic Alejandro Arredondo Stephen Garcia 8068 Canyon Creek Cir Rosa M Vizcarra 8342 Kingfisher Dr Pleasanton,CA 94588-4764 826 S Orange Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92646-5548 Santa Ana,CA 92701-5848 ID 22 APN 148-043-46 ID 20 APN 148-044-30 ID 23 APN 148-043-45 Philip Snowden Tran Su Hong&Thu Pham Harvey Feinstein 8361 Doncaster Dr 8361 Lomond Dr 8371 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6904 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6911 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6904 ID 24 APN 148-044-02 ID 1 APN 148-041-43 ID 28 APN 148-043-44 John And Mary Koch Thomas Kuhn Eugen And Irma Desmet 8372 Doncaster Dr 8376 Terranova Cir 8381 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6905 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7644 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6904 ID 26 APN 148-044-28 ID 27 APN 148-044-03 ID 2 APN 148-041-44 Dons Bailey Xuan Vu&Ngoc Tran Dong Shim 8381 Lomond Dr 8382 Doncaster Dr 8386 Terranova Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6911 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6905 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7644 ID 31 APN 148-044-27 ID 30 APN 148-044-04 ID 34 APN 148-043-42 Michael And Blaine Bnnsfield Ryan Schomberg &Suzanne Medeiros Toshiko Takahashi Spencer T Gilpatnck 8392 Doncaster Dr 8401 Doncaster Dr 8391 Lomond Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6905 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6911 ID 32 APN 148-044-26 ID 5 APN 148-041-46 ID 35 APN- 148-043-41 Richard And Audrey Powers Tuan And Kathy Pham Samuel Stockinger 8401 Lomond Dr 8406 Terranova Cir Joni L Valley-stockinger Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7646 8411 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID 36 APN 148-044-06 ID 6 APN 148-041-47 ID 40 APN 148-043-40 Brian Teague Toan&Thang T Dam Robert And Kellie Stirrat 8412 Doncaster Dr 8416 Terranova Cir 8421 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7646 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID 38 APN' 148-044-24 ID 39 APN 148-044-07 ID 7 APN 148-041-48 David And Vanessa Molinan Bruce Marble Nina Nguyen 8421 Lomond Dr 8422 Doncaster Dr 8426 Terranova Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7646 ID 41 APN 148-043-39 ID 43 APN 148-044-23 ID 42 APN 148-044-08 Richard And Angelina Johnson George Tnpp Larry And Barbara Zwart 8431 Doncaster Dr 8431 Lomond Dr 8432 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 T 009L5 ®�r��/®� wsa6p3 do-dod asodxa ® jaded paa3 r ®09L5 a;eldwal®1Van�/asn i I o;euy 6uole puce ® V i 2A slagel @land Ase3 Easy Peel Labels 9 /d o ® See Instruction Sheet o 7� �AVERY�5160® i Use Avery TEMPLATE 5160w treed Paper for Easy Peel FeatureAYO / 1 ID 46 APN 148-043-38 ID 44 APN 148-044-22 ID 19 APN 148-041-50 Patncia Marshall Anthony And Kim Aschenbrenner Joseph Szenyen 8441 Doncaster Dr 8441 Lomond Dr 8446 Terranova Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7646 � i ID 47 APN 148-043-37 ID 49 APN 148-044-21 ID 48 APN 148-044-10 Kevin And Debbie Williams Victor M Martinez Walter Stossier 8447 Doncaster Dr 8447 Lomond Dr 8448 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 ID 52 APN 148-043-36 ID 50 APN 148-044-20 ID 51 APN- 148-044-11 Lary And Mane Doran Michael And Sharon Talbutt James Tsusaki 8451 Doncaster Dr 8451 Lomond Dr 8452 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 ID: 53 APN. 148-043-35 ID 54 APN 148-044-12 ID 56 APN 148-044-18 Greig James W 11 Dept Of Vets Affairs Of State Of CA T And Leighton Pederson Karen L Isaacs-greig 8462 Doncaster Dr 8471 Lomond Dr 8461 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID 57 APN 148-044-13 ID 59 APN 148-043-33 ID 61 APN 148-044-17 Daniel And Mary Bamett Maureen Mills Jose Rodnguez&Corona 8472 Doncaster Dr 8481 Doncaster Dr 8481 Lomond Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6906 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 ID 64 APN 148-043-32 ID 62 APN 148-044-16 ID 63 APN 148-044-15 Patnck Szafirski Alice Loftis Doncaster Street Trust 8491 Doncaster Dr 8491 Lomond Dr 8492 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6912 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-6903 ID 81 APN 148-081-07 ID 86 APN 148-082-11 ID 84 APN 148-086-21 Wayne A Lewis Aileen Nguyen Aline Schaum 8512 Sandy Hook Dr 8521 Milne Dr 8521 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7005 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 ID 85 APN 148-086-22 ID 82 APN 148-081-06 ID 83 APN 148-081-06 Jason And Leilen Shelton Chnstian D Ambra D Chnstian 8522 Milne Dr 8522 Sandy Hook Dr 8522 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 ID 107 APN 148-082-33 ID 110 APN 148-086-20 ID 109 APN 148-086-23 Edward Williams Jerry Wells Michael Dangott 8531 Milne Dr 8531 Sandy Hook Dr 8532 Milne Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7005 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7016 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 ID 111 APN 148-081-05 ID 108 APN 148-082-32 ID. 113 APN 148-086-19 Cathy Cowger Jean lckhan Donald Stack 8532 Sandy Hook Dr 8541 Milne Dr 8541 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7005 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 ttiquettes faciles a peter A Consultez la feuille www.avery.com Utilisez le qabadt AVERYO 5160® Sens de chargement d'instruction 2Z- 1-800-GO-AVERV Easy Peet Labels 7®�� a Ls ® See Instruction Sheet i t� ®AVERY®516U® Use Avery TEMP TE 5160 Feed Paper for Easy Peel Feature / ID 114 APN 148-086-24 1D 112 APN 148-081-04 ID 499 APN 148-121-20 Ronald Fox Ryan And Carol Drumm H&Z Investments Lic 8542 Milne Dr 8542 Sandy Hook Dr 8551 Edison Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7017 Huntington Beach,CA 92648-3741 ID 116 APN 148-086-18 ID 115 APN 148-086-25 ID 117 APN 148-081-03 Andrew And Marilyn Bumatay Reynaldo And Lourdes Lopez Leslie Jepsen 8551 Sandy Hook Dr 8552 Milne Dr 8552 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7617 ID 119 APN 148-086-17 ID 120 APN 148-086-26 ID 118 APN 148-081-02 Joann Dickens ! Refugio Apodaca Steve Mc Kendry 8561 Sandy Hook Dr 8562 Milne Dr 8562 Sandy Hook Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7016 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7006 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7017 i ID 37 APN 148-044-25 ID 323 APN 114482-08 ID 150 APN 148-071-28 James Thies Shigeko Hosokawa Charles Lindsay 8563 Amazon River Cir 8570 Rock Fish Cir 8622 Hatteras Dr Fountain Valley,CA 92708-5510 Fountain Valley,CA 92708-5006 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7024 ID 151 APN 148-071-27 ID 178 APN 148-071-26 ID 179 APN 148-071-25 Brian And Suzanne Geisert Richard And Yvonne Button Michael Goldstein 8632 Hatteras Dr 8642 Hatteras Dr 8652 Hatteras Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 ID 180 APN 148-071-24 ID 181 APN 148-071-23 ID. 182 APN 148-071-22 Joann Stevens Leon Hart Michael And Jena Buono 8662 Hatteras Dr 8682 Hatteras Dr Lynn Jena Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 8692 Hatteras Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7024 ID 209 APN 148-071-21 ID 211 APN 148-071-19 ID 341 APN 149-011-04 Patricia Tessier Billy And Robin Humphries Albert Ashurst 8702 Hatteras Dr 8732 Hatteras Dr 8886 Plumas Cir Unit 1122c Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7025 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7025 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-5766 ID 325 APN 114-482-06 ID 240 APN 149-041-16 ID 244 APN 149-011-01 Jack Byrd Rodney And Patricia Magsanide Dominic Menaldi 8915 Woodlawn Dr 9001 Adelia Cir 9001 Bermuda Dr Granbury, TX 76049-4404 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 ID 238 APN 149-031-40 ID 234 APN 149-031-08 ID 242 APN 149-041-32 Devin And Danna Chase James And Elsa Harrington Tad And Nancy Buchoz 9001 Niguel Cir 9001 Regatta Dr 9001 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 ID 241 APN 149-041-17 ID 237 APN 149-031-25 ID 268 APN 114481-19 Lydia King Janet Wineland Richard Mortimer 9002 Adelia Cir 9002 Bobbie Cir 9002 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Etiquettes facites a peler ® Consultez la feuille www.avery.com Easy"Labels ''-7-e) F A ® See Instruction Sheet'Use Avery®TEMPLATE 516pe j�Feed Paper for Easy Peel featuredFAW �1} Q/W�1�Y�516fl® 1 ID 239 APN 149-041-01 ID 235 APN 149-031-09 ID 243 APN 149-041-33 William And Darlene Wall Francde Juhl Shidee Earley 9002 Niguel Cir 9002 Regatta Dr 9002 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 ID 269 APN 114-481-20 ID 282 APN 149-041-15 ID 278 APN 149-011-02 David And Deanna Wagester i Donald Churchward Guy Adams 9012 Christine Dr 9021 Adelia Cir 9021 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 ID 286 APN 149-031-23 ID 284 APN 149-031-39 ID 280 APN 149-041-31 Steven And Debra Clark James And Deborah Zisch Powell Odie L 3rd 9021 Bobbie Cir 9021 Niguel Cir 9021 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 ID 281 APN 149-041-18 ID 277 APN 149-023-12 ID 285 APN 149-031-26 Terry Finley Richard Kilekas Sandra Tyler 9022 Adelia Cir 9022 Aloha Dr 9022 Bobbie Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 ID 270 APN 114-481-21 ID 283 APN 149-041-02 ID 287 APN 149-031-10 Kourosh And Fanba Khavan Christopher And Mauren Moore Lynn Davis Bekki 9022 Christine Dr 9022 Niguel Cir 9022 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 ID 279 APN 149-041-34 ID 295 APN 149-041-14 ID 299 APN 149-011-03 Nasser And Jennifer Mustafa Patrick Beachner Ronald And Karen Jett 9022 Rhodesia Dr 9031 Adelia Cir 9031 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 ID 293 APN 149-031-38 ID 289 APN 149-031-06 ID 297 APN 149-041-30 Christopher Young Leon Madnick David Archibald 9031 Niguel Cir 9031 Regatta Dr 9031 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 ID 296 APN 149-041-19 ID 292 APN 149-031-27 ID 271 APN 114-481-22 Jem Kuns Shawn And Elisha Roth Keith Tucker 9032 Adelia Cir 9032 Bobbie Cir 9032 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 ID 294 APN 149-041-03 ID 290 APN 149-031-11 ID 298 APN 149-041-35 John Oschman George Johnson C And L Peterson 9032 Niguel Cir 9032 Regatta Dr 9032 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 ID 345 APN 149-041-13 ID 349 APN 149-031-21 ID 347 APN 149-031-37 Brogdon Edward Velazquez Michael White&Catherine De Ceglie 9041 Adelia Cir 9041 Bobbie Cir 9041 Niguel Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 ttiquettes faciles a peter A Consultez la feuille 2y www.avery.com I1filien7 In naknAt AVFRVe C9tiAe Cpm tip fhnrripmant + onn r— Easy Peel Labels 9- 7 ♦ ® See Instruction Sheet,,, � � �� RY®5160® ; Use Avery TEMPLATE 5160 Feed Paper for Easy Peel FeatureE�'W 1 ID 351 APN 149-031-05 ID 343 APN 149-041-29 ID 344 APN 149-041-20 Kevin And Rebecca Broussard Bruce And Julie Barros E And V Moynagh 9041 Regatta Dr 9041 Rhodesia Dr 9042 Adelia Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 ID 312 APN 149-023-13 ID- 348 APN 149-031-28 ID 320 APN 114481-23 Manuel Urzua Eric Laipenieks Stanley Marriott 9042 Aloha Dr 9042 Bobbie Cir 9042 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 1 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 ID 346 APN 149-041-04 1D 350 APN 149-031-12 ID 342 APN 149-041-36 Sullivan Family Kenneth Crites Robert Norqulst 9042 Niguel Cir j 9042 Regatta Dr 9042 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 ID 331 APN 149-023-14 ID 321 APN 114-481-24 ID 358 APN 149-041-12 Ralph Osterkamp Philip And Suzanne Beukema May Zirbel 9052 Aloha Dr 9052 Christine Dr 9061 Adelia Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 ID 333 APN 149-024-27 ID 354 APN 149-031-20 ID 335 APN 149-022-27 Henry Kerfoot Gann And Rosario Payne Steve Gingrich 9061 Aloha Dr 9061 Bobbie Cir 9061 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7801 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7829 1D 337 APN 149-021-02 ID 356 APN 149-031-36 ID 352 APN 149-031-04 Jude Olivas Darren Magot Jerry And Denise Gutierrez 9061 Mahalo Dr 9061 Niguel Cir 9061 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7838 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 ID 360 APN 149-041-28 ID 359 APN 149-041-21 ID 332 APN 149-023-15 Robert And Paula Brown Carolyn Crockett Richard Legere 9061 Rhodesia Dr 9062 Adelia Cir 9062 Aloha Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 1D 340 APN 149-012-04 ID 355 APN 149-031-29 ID 338 APN 149-014-03 Robert Dayyat John And Sonia Villa Richard Loy 9062 Bermuda Dr 9062 Bobbie Cir 9062 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7813 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7819 ID 334 APN 149-024-04 ID 336 APN 149-022-04 ID 357 APN 149-041-05 Daniel And Shen Rawlins John Engh David And Pamela Chapman 9062 Kapaa Dr 9062 Mahalo Dr 9062 Niguel Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7830 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7842 ID 353 APN 149-031-13 ID 361 APN 149-041-37 ID 381 APN 149-024-26 Don Kim Scott Swanson George Bullock 9062 Regatta Dr 9062 Rhodesia Dr 9071 Aloha Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7801 Etiquettes faciles a peter A Consultez la feuille 7 5 wvvw.avery.com l i+deanv iu nnhnrrt A\/CRVe Sidle SPnQ rip charripmant + Qnn_t--n nvcov Easy Peel Labels 9—7®(� A ® See Instruction Sheet j ����� aAVERIr®516o® Use Avery TEMPLATE 5160 Feed Paper for Easy Peel Featured d, 1 ID 365 APN 149-031-19 ID 383 APN 114-482-09 ID 379 APN 149-022-26 Mary Sindel Malcolm And Marianne Mac Kenzie Jason And J Pyle 9071 Bobbie Cir 9071 Christine Dr 9071 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8313 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7829 ID 367 APN 149-031-35 ID 363 APN 149-031-03 ID 370 APN 149-041-22 Samuel And Pamela Lafata Karl And Heidi Tahti Lenora Raia 9071 Niguel Cir 9071 Regatta Dr 9072 Adelia Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 1 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 ID 366 APN 149-031-30 ID 384 APN 114-481-26 ID 380 APN 149-024-05 1 Kenneth Roberts Karl Wysocki Enkka Thompson 9072 Bobbie Cir 9072 Christine Dr 9072 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7830 i ID 378 APN 149-022-05 ID 368 APN 149-041-06 ID 364 APN 149-031-14 Gino And Jenny Angelici Raymond Zajac Edmund Moreno 9072 Mahalo Dr 9072 Niguel Cir 9072 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 ID 372 APN 149-041-38 ID 408 APN 149-041-10 ID 396 APN 149-024-25 Richard Smyser Edward And Yvette Arango Shidee Stroner 9072 Rhodesia Dr 9081 Adelia Cir 9081 Aloha Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7801 ID 373 APN 149-011-06 ID 412 APN 149-031-18 ID 386 APN 114-482-10 James Olsen Gunnar Industries Ltd Steven Hayes 9081 Bermuda Dr 9081 Bobbie Cir 9081 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8313 ID 375 APN 149-012-26 ID 398 APN 149-022-25 ID 377 APN 149-021-03 Brian Hunter Gordon Emerson Robert Frye 9081 Kahului Dr 9081 Kapaa Dr 9081 Mahalo Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7818 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7829 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7838 ID 410 APN 149-031-34 ID 414 APN 149-031-02 ID 406 APN 149-041-26 John Sheedy Mark Bowman Chris Ogawa 9081 Niguel Cir 9081 Regatta Dr 9081 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 ID 407 APN 149-041-23 ID 374 APN 149-012-05 ID 411 APN 149-031-31 Richard And Roslyn Bashore Robert And Constance Mclin David And Kristine Wetzel 9082 Adelia Cir 9082 Bermuda Dr 9082 Bobbie Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7813 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 ID 385 APN 114-481-27 ID 399 APN 149-022-06 ID 409 APN 149-041-07 Foad Jahansouz&Maureen R Connolly Fast James A John Kaufmann 9082 Christine Dr 9082 Mahalo Dr 9082 Niguel Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8314 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Etiquettes faciles a peter A Consultez la fewlle www.avery corn I ltihcP7 to nnhnrit A\/FQV®rirn® Sans dP_rharnpmpnY rlhnc+rnr+:nn 1_Qnn-1 n_nvcov Easy Peel Labels 7�� i ® See Instruction Sheet I � J' \ ' Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5160 'Feed Paper for Easy Peel Feature QA�lERY®5160® q ID 413 APN 149-031-15 ID 405 APN 149-041-39 ID 339 APN 149-012-27 Robert And Lorraine Low Irene lannitti Neal Rieffanaugh 9082 Regatta Dr 9082 Rhodesia Dr 909 Tiller Way Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625-1649 ID 421 APN 149-041-09 ID 404 APN 149-011-07 ID 417 APN 149-031-17 Kevin And Enka Kelley Tuan Tran Kim And Darnel Healy 9091 Adelia Cir 9091 Bermuda Dr 9091 Bobbie Cir Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7812 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 ID 402 APN 149-012-25 ID 431 APN 149-022-24 ID 400 APN 149-021-04 Walter And Carolyn Coyle Kenneth Whitehead Douglas And Lisa Ahuero 9091 Kahului Dr 9091 Kapaa Dr 9091 Mahalo Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7818 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7829 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7838 ID 419 APN 149-031-33 ID 415 APN 149-031-01 ID 423 APN 149-041-25 Thomas And Constance Bowles Joseph And Mana Young William Lacey 9091 Niguel Cir 9091 Regatta Dr 9091 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7847 ID 422 APN 149-041-24 ID 395 APN 149-023-17 ID 403 APN' 149-012-06 Stevenson Family Stephen Willerth Scott Tracy 9092 Adelia Cir 9092 Aloha Dr Carmen Bridge Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7805 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7802 9092 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7813 ID 418 APN 149-031-32 ID 401 APN 149-014-05 ID 432 APN 149-024-07 William And Carol Ward Martha Kwan Allen Wachi 9092 Bobbie Cir 9092 Kahului Dr 9092 Kapaa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7816 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7819 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7830 ID 430 APN 149-022-07 ID 420 APN 149-041-08 ID 416 APN 149-031-16 Stephen And Dorothy Brinkerhoff Michael Grossman Lorraine Lachapelle 9092 Mahalo Dr 9092 Niguel Cir 9092 Regatta Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7839 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7842 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7844 ID 424 APN 149-041-40 ID 437 APN 149-024-23 ID 425 APN 149-011-08 Betty Wells Maida Seymour Anthony And Stella Zografides 9092 Rhodesia Dr 9101 Aloha Dr 9101 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7848 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7865 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7862 ID 427 APN 149-012-24 ID 439 APN 149-022-23 ID 429 APN 149-021-05 Donald And Joan Schlieter Donald Swords Harold Loomis 9101 Kahului Dr 9101 Kapaa Dr 9101 Mahalo Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7820 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7864 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7863 ID 434 APN 149-023-18 ID 426 APN 149-012-07 ID 428 APN 149-014-06 Herman Chenier Dennis Mc Donald Mark And Bettina Carnahan 9102 Aloha Dr 9102 Bermuda Dr 9102 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7815 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7825 Etiquettes faciles a peter A Consultez la feuille Z.-I www.avery corn UtdwP7 IP naharit oVFRV®S1fin® Sens de charnement a�..,�r�..,+:.... ,_onn_�n nvcnv Easy Peel Labels —��� w u A ® See Instruction Sheet i ��� �����®5160® 1 Use Avery®TEMPLATE 51601 Feed Paper ® for Easy Peel Feature ID 438 APN 149-024-08 ID 394 APN 114482-18 1D 446 APN 149-041-41 Donald Davidson Christopher Condon Mark And Christine Mc Donell 9102 Kapaa Dr 9102 Playa Dr 9102 Rhodesia Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7832 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8317 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7849 ID 456 APN 149-024-22 ID 445 APN 149-011-09 ID 443 APN 149-012-23 Alan And Erica Walencewicz William Stilwell Elizabeth Parkovich 9111 Aloha Dr 9111 Bermuda Dr 9111 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7865 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7862 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7820 ID 436 APN 149-023-19 ID 444 APN 149-012-08 ID 442 APN- 149-014-07 Mark And Susan Semon Frederick Waterfall Rose And Michael Thurston 9112 Aloha Dr 9112 Bermuda Dr 9112 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7815 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7825 ID 455 APN 149-024-09 ID 453 APN 149-022-09 ID. 435 APN. 114482-19 Ludele Jenkins Paul Strain Joe And Rita Croom 9112 Kapaa Dr 9112 Mahalo Dr Almanza Rita Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7832 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7841 9112 Playa Dr _ Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8317 ID 447 APN 149-041-42 ID 448 APN 149-011-10 ID 450 APN 149-012-22 Evangeline Rentas Kent Mc Gamgle Ole Oleson 9112 Rhodesia Dr 9121 Bermuda Dr 9121 Kahului Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7849 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7862 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7820 ID 14 APN 148-041-08 ID 457 APN 149-023-20 ID 322 APN 114-481-25 Mortimer Shea Neil And Lon Wells Robert Dutton 9121 Kapaa Dr 9122 Aloha Dr 9122 Christine Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7864 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7804 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8316 ID 528 APN 114-160-82 ID 451 APN 149-014-08 ID 458 APN 114-493-31 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy J Kirkom Quang Nguyen 9122 Kahului Dr 9122 Kahului Dr 9122 Playa Dr Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7825 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7825 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8317 ID 210 APN 148-071-20 ID 60 APN 148-044-14 ID 18 APN 148-04149 Martha Gamble Scott Underhill Phat Nguyen 9502 Smokey Cir 9881 Oceancrest Dr 9934 Thistle Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92646-5362 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-8201 Fountain Valley,CA 92708-2044 ID 460 APN 114-150-50 ID 532 APN 114481-34 ID 3 APN 148-04145 State Of Calif Dept Of Public Works City Of Huntington Beach Seaside Terrace Inc Po Box 187000 Real Estate Services Div Po Box 3171 Sacramento, CA 95818-7000 Po Box 190 Cypress,CA 90630-7171 Huntington Beach, CA 92648-0190 ID 134 APN 148-086-02 ID 87 APN 148-082-12 ID 263 APN 114-481-14 Gunvor Aanensen Donald Pattison&Audrey E James Gary Gumbert Po Box 4108 Po Box 414 Po Box 483 Newport Beach,CA 92661-4108 Claremont, CA 91711-0414 Surfside,CA 90743-0483 ftiquettes faciles a peler A Consultez la feuille Z�b www.averycom iitaicnv in noh.rit AVFRv® ;iAno Sens dp rharnpmpnt A'enctrnrtann 1-ann-r:n-awrpv Easy Peet Labels i A ® See Instruction SheetaAVERYp51600 it Use Avery®TEMPLATE 51600 '!Feed Paper for Easy Peel Featurei ID 291 APN 149-031-22 ID 265 APN 114-481-16 ID 515 APN 114-150-63 Henry And Toni Baez Frank And Michelle Gandara Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Po Box 5460 Po Box 5461 Po Box 5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5460 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5461 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 i ID 516 APN 114-160-86 ID 517 APN 114-160-75 ID 518 APN 114-160-70 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Po Box 5903 Po Box 5903 Po Box 5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 Huntington Beach, CA 92615-5903 ID 519 APN 114-160-84 ID 397 APN 149-024-06 ID 371 APN 149-041-27 Huntington Bch Wetlands Conservancy Yung Pan Ralph Silva Po Box 5903 Po Box 6094 Po Box 6756 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-5903 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-6094 Huntington Beach,CA 92615-6756 ID 324 APN 114-482-07 J Johnston ID APN ID APN Po Box 7932 - Newport Beach,CA 92658-7932 ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN "�717/i6 ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN Etiquettes faciles a peter ® Consultez la feuille Z www.avery.com Haber;+ A%=Dv®e9CA0 riC rhnrroamanY Easy Peel Labels 9-7-/0 A ® See Instruction Sheet Use Avery®TEMPLATE 51600 j Feed Paper ® for Easy Peel Feature, WAVERY®5160® ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Occupant 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 14a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 15a 21730 Newland St Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7611 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7612 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 16 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 20 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 21 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 5 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 6 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 7 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7619 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 9 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 10a 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 1 a Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7619 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 ID 467 APN 114-150-53 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 3a 21851 Newland St Spc 126 21851 Newland St Spc 131 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7620 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Occupant Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 136 21871 Newland St Oft 21851 Newland St Spc 57 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7615 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7617 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 58 21851 Newland St Spc 59 21851 Newland St Spc 71 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 72 21851 Newland St Spc 80 21851 Newland St Spc 93 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 99 21851 Newland St Spc 5 21851 Newland St Spc 6 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7621 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7622 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7622 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 11 21851 Newland St Spc 8 21851 Newland St Spc 16 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7623 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7624 Ittiquettes faciles a peter ® Consultez la feudle 30 www.avM.com A%tcov®rq cn® Cane rle rhnrnomnn4 Easy Peel Labels 9/7��� ® See Instruction Sheet oAVERYQ)51600 Use Avery TEMPLATE 5160 j Feed Paper for Easy Peel Featured �� 1 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 11D.470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 17 21851 Newland St Spc 41 21851 Newland St Spc 42 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7624 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 43 21851 Newland St Spc 44 21851 Newland St Spc 46 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7628 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID-470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 102 21851 Newland St Spc 104 21851 Newland St Spc 107 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID.470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 108 21851 Newland St Spc 109 21851 Newland St Spc 124 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7629 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 140 21851 Newland St Spc 144 21851 Newland St Spc 147 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7630 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 151 21851 Newland St Spc 179 21851 Newland St Spc 195 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7630 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7632 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 200 21851 Newland St Spc 290 21851 Newland St Spc 216 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7633 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7634 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 224 21851 Newland St Spc 227 21851 Newland St Spc 230 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7635 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 232 21851 Newland St Spc 233 21851 Newland St Spc 236 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 238 21851 Newland St Spc 239 21851 Newland St Spc 243 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7636 Etiquettes faciles a peter A Consultez la feuille 3l www.avery com tltili'P7 la nahnrit AVFRV®RIAA® Sens do rharapmpnt 4 onn --^ AWCOW Easy Peel Labels - ® See Instruction Sheet fM'QW WAVERY051600 Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 51600 ® !,Feed Paper for Easy Peel Feature k A PN ID 470 A 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 245 21851 Newland St Spc 251 21851 Newland St Spc 258 Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7636 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 264 21851 Newland St Spc 265 21851 Newland St Spc 266 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7637 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 270 21851 Newland St Spc 272 21851 Newland St Spc 273 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 282 21851 Newland St Spc 283 21851 Newland St Spc 285 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 286 21851 Newland St Spc 300 21851 Newland St Spc 303 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7639 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 306 21851 Newland St Spc 310 21851 Newland St Spc 311 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7640 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 Resident Resident Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 313 21851 Newland St Spc 314 21851 Newland St Spc 1 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7641 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 ID 470 APN 114-150-72 ID 507 APN Resident Resident ID APN 21851 Newland St Spc 3 8641 Edison Ave - Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7642 Huntington Beach,CA 92648-3741 ID APN ID APN 917/116 ID APN ID APN ID APN ID APN Ctiquettes faciles a peter ® Consultez la feudle 22-2- w.avery corn I I-«..4.-..:+ nvcov®ca cn® Gonc r1n rhnrnmmant .14..E+....+..... 7 onn r_n nvcov Easy Peel®Labels A ® Bend along line to i � ��® 5160® Use Avery@ Template 51600 j Feed Paper �� expose Pop-Up EdgeTM j State Clearinghouse Ricky Ramos Tom Luster, Environmental Scientist State of CA Governor's Office of Planning City of Huntington Beach CA Coastal Commission 1400101h St 200 Main Street 45 Fremont St #2000 Sacramento,CA 95812-3044 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 San Francisco,CA 94105-2219 Linda Adams, Secretary for EPA Lester Snow,Secretary for Natural Joe Geever CA Environmental Protection Agency Resources Surfrider Foundation 1001 1 Street 1416 Ninth St #1311 P 0 Box 6010 Sacramento,CA 95814 Sacramento,CA 95814 San Clemente, CA 92674 Cy Oggins, Div Environment Planning Christopher Herre, Branch Chief Greg Holmes, Unit Chief CA State Lands Commission Dept of Transportation District 12 Department of Toxic Substances 100 Howe Ave #100-South 3337 Michelson Dr #380 5796 Corporate Ave Sacramento,CA 95825-8202 Irvine,CA 92612-8894 Cypress,CA 90630 Ian MacMillan,Program Supervisor Kimberly Brandt, Development Srvc Mark Lewis, Director of Public Works South Coast Air Quality Mgmt District City of Costa Mesa City of Fountain Valley 21865 Copley Dr 77 Fair Dr 10200 Slater Ave Diamond Bar,CA 91765-4182 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-4736 Marwan Youssef, Public Works Director Delame Shane, Mgr Environmental Shawn Dewant, Board President City of Westminster Planning Mesa Consolidated Water District 8200 Westminster Blvd Metropolitan Water District of Southern CA 1965 Placentia Ave Westminster,CA 92683 P 0 Box 54153 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Los Angeles, CA 90054-0153 Michael Markus,General Manager Jenelle Froisland, Local Public Affairs Mgr Paul Shoenberger Orange County Water District SCE CalDesal P 0 Box 8300 7333 Bolsa Ave 1965 Placentia Ave Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8300 Westminster,CA 92683 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Mary Jo Baretich, President Mark Adelson,Chief Regional Planner Robert Schaaf,Chairman Cabrillo Wetlands Conservancy CA Regional Water Quality Control Bd. City of Huntington Beach 27152 Pacific Coast Hwy#23A 3737 Main St #500 Environmental Board Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Riverside,CA 92501-3348 607 Frankfort Ave Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Toby Moore,Water Resources Manager Golden State Water Company 1902 W Corporate Way Anaheim,CA 92801 Don Schulz,Advisor Merle Moshin David Hamilton Residents for Responsible Desalination 19412 Pompan Dr #107 5401 Kenilworth Dr P 0 Box 5422 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Huntington Beach,CA 92615 Michael Balsamo, Mgr Gen'I Land Use Eileen Murphy Jason Pyle Orange County Public Works 20121 st St 9071 Kapaa Dr P 0 Box 4048 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92646 Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 ttiquettes faciles d peler l Repliez a la hachure afin de l ` ���� vQJ avery corn I Utdisez le abarit AVERY®51600 Sens de rev6ler le rebord Po U T"" ' 1-800-GO-AVERY 9 ) chargement p- p j 9/� �U 1 Easy Peele1 Labels A I— Bend along line to IA�I�Y® 5160® Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper — expose Pop-Up Edger"" Q�Q2 - Z 6 9Z9Z6 VO`esaW BISOO 011-j# a AV AentilV 151E aadaa�jseoo/qunoo 96uejp 101=14 u016a�f uJ9IS9M`aouue}S Ioue13 J0139110 9A4no9x3 `unnol8 tiae9 AGWO V.PIS 'A119A u1100 MZ6 VO'4oea8 uoj6ul;unH MZ6 V8'4oea8 uo}6uljunH 9ue1 spueipooM 96161 IS w9 LOZ uuAM paeMOH jgeedS pai j V loaeo MZ6 VO'40e98 uol6ullunH MZ6 VO'4oea8 uoftijunH MZ6 VO'4oea8 uOI6u4unH 913JID POOMIS83 ZZ£OZ auej 41nouuek 1V£1Z auel ouea}sideo Z£OZZ 6ulpinedS APGAa8 TIWS AooS gooS ugOr Etiquettes faciles 6 peler S Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utdisez le gabarit AVERY®51600-_-_)— Senscle chargement reveller le rebord Pop-UpTM 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED FOR AGENDA ITEM REGARDING A PROPOSED SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECT BY POSEIDON RESOURCES (SURFSIDE) LLC LOCATED SOUTH OF EDISON AVENUE AND EAST OF NEWLAND STREET Esparza, Pat$y From• Ramos, Ricky Sent. Monday, August 30, 2010 3 06 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7.52 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW• Desalination project From: Yvonne Rothstein [mailto-yrothstein03@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 9.35 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination project I have been a resident of Huntington Beach for 27 years, I support the desalination project and encourage you to vote yes." Thank you for your vote Yvonne Rothstein 714 841-3942 t Esparza, Patty From. Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 07 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject. Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7.53 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Proposed Desalination in HB From: Suzanne Beukema [mailto.sbeukema@socal.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 10.16 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Proposed Desalination in HB Honorable Mayor and HB City Council Members, I am writing you to express my support of Poseidon's Desalination proposed project in Huntington Beach I live near the proposed site and feel that now, more than ever, we need to have alternative sources of water available' Besides offering in a new water source, Poseidon will be bringing in new jobs, and revenue to our city Thank you for your attention to this very important matter Suzanne Beukema 9052 Christine Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-960-9197 sbeukema(a)socal rr com 1 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 08 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7.54 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW• Desalination From: Peter Evans [mailto:Peterevans@socal rr.com] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 11.17 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination I support the desalination project and would like to see ayes vote on the project Who knows what the future will hold and having an additional water source available to the citizens of Orange County seems like a common sense approach to the water problem Any problems with this problem seem like child's play when considering what our civic leaders had to do in the past to get water to Southern California and we need that kind of leadership now in protecting us from the danger of a water shortage in the future Such a shortage is already a problem in LA County, let's set a leadership example of taking a proactive approach to keeping on top of the water shortage problem and support the desalination project Peter W Evans 17038 Bluewater Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92649 1 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 08 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7.54 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: HB desalinization project From: David Hoskins [mailto.dhoskins@socal rr.com] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 11:21 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: HB desalinization project This email is to voice our support for the Poseidon Desalinization project Southern California needs a reliable source of drinking water in the years ahead and this project will provide both water and revenues to the City 1 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 09 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject- Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7.54 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Desalination program From: Kath [ma i Ito:kestrel42@verizon net] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 11:58 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination program Dear City Council I am a resident of Huntington Beach, and I support the desalination project I recently learned that there will be a public hearing on September 7 Due to my work schedule, I am unlikely to be able to attend the meeting, so I wanted to voice my support via email I hope you will consider my opinion as you prepare for the latest SEIR Thank you very much, Kathleen Davis 1819 California St 1 Esparza, Patty From: JacobsPilette@aol com Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 2 18 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Poseidon Hearing I am not sure I will be able to attend the hearing, however, I would like the members to know that Mr Palmer Pilette& I, Patricia Jacobs-Pilette support this venture We feel it is a time we realize we can no longer count our rain fall or the Colorado River to fill our water needs Our population has out grown our present supply And we sit on a massive amount of water-the Pacific Ocean As for harming the sea life, I see no direct harm I speak from the knowledge of a chemical engineer who predicted the gulf would adjust itself-and it did So will the ocean if we borrow the water Respectfully, Palmer& Patricia Pilette iacobspilette(a-)-aol com 1 Es From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 20. 2010310PM To: Esparsa. raoy Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, August30, 2010 7:55AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Poseidon project �rrxmm: lean Kp`�c' ' ~ ' -Or�, . ^ , �4 COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED FOR AGENDA \M/ EGARDING A PROPOSED SEAWATER DESALINNATION PROJECT BY / \ POSEIDON RESOURCES (SURFSIDE) LLC LOCATED SOUTH Of EDISON AVEIV� E AND EAST OF ,NEWLAND STREET: f Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 11 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:55 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Our Vote for Poseidon From: AMENRED@aol.com [mailto:AMENRED@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 12:50 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Our Vote for Poseidon Dear City Council, I have been in support of the Poseidon desalination project since first hearing about it years ago You have the vote of myself and my wife We feel it is necessary to have other sources of good safe water in these times of water shortages and possibly terrorist plots against water reservoirs You have our vote, Dale and Virginia Nelson 2861A Coast Cir Hunt Beach, Ca 92649 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 11 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7.57 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW. Desalination Plant From: Julie Ann [mailto•jamuzzall@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 3.26 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Cc: Hart Jr Subject: Desalination Plant Dear Members of the Huntington Beach City Council, I encourage you to vote YES and approve the Desalination Plant construction and implementation It is imperative that we have a consistent and clear resource of water for Orange County! I live and work in North Orange County and I am a native Californian who has watched our county grow beyond its water capacity I am currently using recycled water (I call it poop water) and although I am assured of its purity, I cringe every time I use it. Please vote YES and support the Desalination Plant! Sincerely, Julie Ann Muzzall i Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 12 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:57 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: From: DON PETERS [mailto:donpeters@msn.com] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 12-57 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Dear Council Members I write in support of the desalination project It is past time for our city and county to address our future water needs With your yes vote you may take pride in your foresight and wisdom Not only will you have seen and identified a pressing need, but you will have displayed the courage to take action on it Not much more can be asked of a public servant My congratulations in advance Don Peters Esparza, Patty From: KirkBRIM@aol corn Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 4 30 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Water project I support the Poseidon project and wish you would vote in favor on Sept 7th Kirk Bnmhall 1 Esparza, Patsy From: Mason Truluck [rmtru I uck@g mail com] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 2 39 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Support for Poseidon Desalination Project Unless there is newly proven or recently exposed damaging and destructive environmental factors,we should absolutely approve this water purification project R Mason Truluck 16454 Harbour Lane Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Esparza, Patty From: Bruce West[ecurbeast@socal rr corn] Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 1 24 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Poseidon Desalination Dear council members: I will be unable to attend the meeting on September 7,but would like to show my support for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination plant in Huntington Beach I am a long-time resident of Huntington Beach (over 25 years) and am proud that the City has recognized that, not only is it possible,but very beneficial to the residents to have the seawater desalination plant. I would suggest to the obtuse hardliners that are objecting to this project to refuse any benefits derived by the citizens; including fresh water to drink and nourish their cacti, as well as any monetary benefits to the city for schools, roadwork and other necessary projects. However, if it is discovered that any income from this desalination plant is diverted to the pockets of government officials or their friends and family I will join with the rest of the howling mob to throw the bums out. Thanks again for doing the right thing Bruce West 6742 Gate Hill Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Esearza, Patty From: Matt McKinley[hbmckinley@gmail com] Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 8 06 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Poseidon Public Hearing Set for Tuesday, September 7 "We support the desalination project and encourage you to vote yes " This city needs everyjob it can get and the tax revenues. Best Regards, Matt& Dawn McKinley of Huntington Beach McKinley's hbmckinleyAgmail com 1 Esparza, Patty From: Tom Burrow[teburrow1935@yahoo com] Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 7 19 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Cc: Thomas Burrows Subject: seawater desalination huntinton beach facility I can not attend he metting on sept 7 2010. however i do support the building of the desalination plant in huntington beach ca. thomas burrows 3496 windspun dr h.b. ca. 92649 & nbsp; Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 15 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: DanHytrek@aol.com [madto•DanHytrek@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 10:48 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Desalination Project City Council - support the desalination project As a registered voter, I urge the members of the City Council to support the project, too It shows the Huntington Beach is responsibly planning for our water needs Dan Hytrek 16561 Kettler Lane Huntington Beach, CA 1 08/26/2010 1:17 PM FROM Fax TO. 11143741648 PAGE 001 OF 001 David E Hamilton 5401 Kendlworth Drive Huntington Beach,CA 92649 u , Phone. (714)840-8W1 E-marl de hamdton(Qu verrzon.net j August 26,2010 City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 AM. R Ramos Via fax:714-374-1648 Re: Poseidon Resources Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report(I)SEIR) Dear Mr Ramos, I disagree substantially to the published response to my June 9, 2010 comment letter on the subject DSEIR (See pg. 12.689 of Response to Comments) Attributing the concerns I raised to a "typographical error"trivializes the overarching issue of discharge salinity(as does the obtuse verbiage on the conjunction"or') If the discharge volume is indeed 102 MGD,as corrected,the salinity level of the total discharged effluent will be 51 ppt. As a result,the official response to the second point raised in my comment is invalidated The discharge volume of 102 MGD when the plant is at full capacity will yield effluent salinity of 51 ppt at the discharge point,assuming the DSEIR correctly states initial intake salinity is 34 ppt. Therefore the requirement to"Maintain a salinity level of 40 ppt at 100 feet or less from the base of the discharge tower(10%of the ZID)under worst case ocean mixing conditions"cannot be assured. The worst case will be 51 ppt,not 40 ppt. Furthermore,the claim"under worst case"precludes using"under average conditions"as reasoning for the additional commentary in the response Besides, even"under average conditions",40 ppt.at 100 feet cannot be assured. Again,these numerical amounts(values) are critical to other determinations of the effects the Poseidon project will have on the ocean environment. An SEIR should not be considered adequate until these substantive matters are resolved. Regards, David Hamilton Huntington Beach Resident de.hamrltonna,verrmn.net Ph-(714)840-8901 Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7 55 AM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 6339 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Harvey Levin Description: I'm in favor of the Seawater Desalination Huntington Beach Facility. I'm asking the City Council to vote yes on this very worthwhile project It will benefit all of Orange County as well as our city Harvey Levin 8566 Sierra Cir #911-D Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i Esgarza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7 58 AM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 6340 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Bob Fitzgerald Description: Dear HB City Council Members, As a resident of over 40 years in Huntington my family and I hope that you will support the Saltwater Desalination project under consideration We believe it to be a necessary and prudent investment to our quality of life here in Huntington Beach My family and I plan on attending the council meeting on September 7th to show our support for this project Bob FitzGerald moxiefitzkearthlmk.net Have a great day Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11 08 AM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfaty-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6342 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Don MacAllister Description: Please approve the action item you have on the agenda for Sept 7 regarding the Poseidon project We need more sources of water and it will also help the economy of HB yours, Don thewaterman Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note. This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1 14 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Surf City Pipeline [madto.noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:56 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Notification of Changed Topic for Request #: 6339 Request# 6339 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Jason Kelley. Request type: Comment Request area: Planning -All Reassigned Inquiries to Planning Citizen name: Harvey Levin Description: I'm in favor of the Seawater Desalination Huntington Beach Facility I'm asking the City Council to vote yes on this very worthwhile project It will benefit all of Orange County as well as our city. Harvey Levin 8566 Sierra Cir #911-1) Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note- This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1 14 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Surf City Pipeline [ma i Ito:noreply@ user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7.58 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Notification of Changed Topic for Request #: 6340 Request#6340 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Jason Kelley. Request type: Comment Request area: Planning - All Reassigned Inquiries to Planning Citizen name: Bob Fitzgerald Description: Dear HB City Council Members, As a resident of over 40 years in Huntington my family and I hope that you will support the Saltwater Desalination project under consideration We believe it to be a necessary and prudent investment to our quality of life here in Huntington Beach My family and I plan on attending the council meeting on September 7th to show our support for this project. Bob FitzGerald moxiefitzgearthlink net Have a great day! Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3 09 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson,Johanna Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 7:55 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW: Opposition to seawater desalination plant From, George Mason (madto:gem325@socal.rr.com] Sent, Saturday,August 28, 2010 12:03 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Opposition to seawater desalination plant Comments applicable to the Public Hearing on September 7th,2010 To the Huntington Beach City Council We are strongly opposed to approval of the Poseidon seawater desalination facility proposed for Huntington Beach. This plant will: 1 Return no tax dollars to Huntington Beach(a nontaxable public entity will acquire the plant before construction is completed). 2. Create an additional noise issue in SE Huntington Beach that will add to the noise already emitted by AES 3. Increase salinity in the seawater discharged through the AES plant to the detriment of local coastal waters. 4. Detract from Huntington Beach's stated goal of becoming a tourist destination 5. Risk start of a development project that will likely not be completed as has happened to several other projects in Huntington Beach 6. Encourage growth in southern Orange County that otherwise would not be possible without the high energy consuming seawater desalination plant 7. Continue a relationship with Poseidon, a company that has already proven itself incapable of completing projects on time and within budget. i 8. Permit Poseidon to state they are not using public funds while they beg the state and other public entities for financial support with tax free loans, bonds and grants In addition, the list of benefits that will result from building the plant as presented by Poseidon are a complete sham, and could easily be disproven if only the City Council would examine facts instead of Poseidon inflated conjecture. Submitted by: George Mason and Charlotte Mason 21641 Bahama Lane Huntington Beach 2 44 GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES Regulatory Services September 7, 2010 Mr Ricky Ramos City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT Video Compact Disc(VCD) -Jurisdictional Determmation for Areas within Containment Berms associated with the Proposed Poseidon Resources Desalination Project in Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr Ramos- Enclosed please find a copy of a Video Compact Disc(VCD)prepared as part of the Jurisdictional Determination conducted on two decommissioned oil tank sites on the AES Huntington Beach Generating Station property and one decommissioned oil tank site on City of Huntington Beach property that combined make up the proposed location for Poseidon's Huntington Beach Desalmation Project. The Jurisdiction Determination serves as Appendix H of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) for the proposed desalination project On February 10 and 24, March 5, May 13, September 10, and October 19, 2009, I examined the project site to determine the presence of areas that could be defined as wetlands in accordance with the wetland delineation criteria used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, City of Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program (LCP) and the California Coastal Act (CCA) The City's Local Coastal Program(LCP) and the California Coastal Act(CCA)presume the presence of wetlands when any of three criteria a predominance of wetland indicator plants, hydric soil, or wetland hydrology, is present Where any one of the three is present, strong, independent evidence of upland conditions must be provided in order to demonstrate that an area is not a wetland under the Coastal Commission's definitions The VCD focuses on some of the key data/information collected during the many months of field work, addressing the evidence of upland conditions in the three containment areas that were evaluated for the presence of wetland indicators The conclusions set forth in the VCD are an accurate summary of the site evaluation, carefully detailed in Appendix H, referenced above that determined that there are no wetlands within the three containment areas based on federal, LCP and Coastal Commission definitions ' Page 8,Jurisdictional Determination,December 2009 Appendix H of the Huntington Beach Desalination Project's Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 29 Orchard Lake Forest California 92630-8300 Telephone: (949) 837-0404 Facsimile: (949) 837-5834 Sincerely, GLENN LUKOS ASSOCIATES, INC Tony Bomkamp Senior Wetland/Regulatory Specialist 'OSEIDON R E S O U R C E S F irisdictional T atermination a& September } Prepared By 2010` ;3 m Lukas Associates } A- W- ER SE HUNTINGTON BEACH EACIP- I N 1' September 2, 2010 The Honorable Cathy Green Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE Huntington Beach Desalination Project-Supporter Cards Dear Mayor Green It is with great pleasure that I am delivering to you 4,709 postcards signed by residents of Huntington Beach and Orange County in support of the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Project I respectfully request that you include the supporter postcards as part of the administrative record for the Tuesday, September 7, 2010 public hearing on the proposed desalination project. These postcards have been collected at numerous community education events in Huntington Beach and throughout Orange County from 2005 through August 2010 Events attended by Poseidon's outreach team have included Huntington Valley Little League Opening Day; Senior Saturday, the Duck-A-Thon; Movie Fridays at Rodgers Senior Center, Huntington Beach Education Foundation's Open Doors home tour, Rainbow Disposal's Earth Day; Huntington Beach Chamber's Green Expo, various civic presentations in Huntington Beach and greater Orange County, golf tournaments benefiting the Council on Aging and the HB Fire Association, the Boys and Girls Clubs of Huntington Valley dinner and silent auction, the Huntington Beach Rotary Sweethearts Ball and Science Showtime; YMCA's Healthy Kids event, and many others Approximately 1,500 postcards alone have been collected since the City initiated the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report process late last year, and approximately 50 of the cards being submitted to you today are from a community event held at the AES Huntington Beach facility this past Saturday, August 28th. The AES event was particularly exciting because it was attended by scores of residents of Southeast Huntington Beach Our team received overwhelmingly positive comments from attendees, and the opportunity to speak with the local neighbors was rewarding These signed postcards are a reflection of the broad support for the project throughout Huntington Beach, as documented by recent public opinion surveys and the project's growing number of individual and organizational endorsements The growing support from the community also shows the need and enthusiasm for a new, drought-proof water supply I look forward to the public hearing on Tuesday, September 7th and welcome the City Councils questions and comments about the proposed desalination project Sincerely, ��—A-f/— Scott Maloni Vice President, Poseidon Resources cc. City Council Ricky Ramos 91-7116 SOX CONTAINING 41709 UNSCANNED SUPPORTER CARDS FOR PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH DESALINATION PROJECT LOCATED IN CITY CLERK VAULT RONALD A. VAN BLARCOM ATTORNEY AT LAW 204 NORTH CALIFORNIA STREET ORANGE,CALIFORNIA 92866 (714)608-9897 ron@vanblarcomlaw com - September 7, 2010 Honorable Mayor Cathy Green Members of the City Council City of Huntington Beach, California 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re Certification of Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) No 10-001 (Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach), Agenda Item 4-1 for the September 7, 2010 Council Meeting Dear Mayor and Councilmembers I have represented Poseidon Resources and been involved with the proposed Seawater Desalmation Project at Huntington Beach since 2002 At the request of the applicant, Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC, I have reviewed Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No 10-001 and the processing of the SEIR by the City of Huntington Beach and found both the report and the process to be in order In this letter, I respectfully request on behalf of Poseidon that the City Council adopt Resolution No 2010-63 and certify the SEIR(Agenda Item 4-1) The SEIR should be certified by the City Council because it has properly disclosed to the concerned citizens and decision makers in Huntington Beach all of the environmental consequences of approving Entitlement Plan Amendment No 10-001, the related land use entitlements (Agenda Item 4-2) and the related Project Agreements (Agenda Items 4-3, 4-4 and 4-5) before you tonight, and it has done so in strict accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the CEQA Guidelines and controlling case law As was the case during the City's consideration of the Recirculated EIR (the "REIR") in 2005, opponents of seawater desalination, and specifically the Huntington Beach project, have argued that the 2010 SEIR has not provided a legal analysis of environmental impacts Some of you may recall that the Council's decision to certify the REIR in 2005 was challenged by some of the same opponents that are challenging this SEIR As shown in the attached Statement of Decision filed on January 5, 2007, the Huntington Beach City Council's decision to certify the 2005 REIR was upheld by 9/7 4 Poseidon Position Statement on SEIR September 7, 2010 Page 2 Orange County Superior Court Judge, David C Velasquez Even a quick read through the Statement of Decision demonstrates that Judge Velasquez was not convinced by the opponents' multiple arguments Many of those same arguments are being made again However, they will fail again because the question of what constitutes a legal analysis of environmental impacts in an environmental impact report is not a new question The answer is provided to this City Council and to other lead agencies by the CEQA statute (Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq), the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, sections 15000 et seq ), and, perhaps most importantly, by the cases decided by California Courts The key is to understand that the purpose of an environmental impact report is to disclose and discuss the potential environmental impacts of a project One court used a common analogy in answering the question of what constitutes a legal analysis an environmental impact report "must contain sufficient detail to help insure the integrity of the process of decisionmaking by precluding stubborn problems or serious criticism from being swept under the rug" (Kings County Farm Bureau v City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal App 3d 692, 733 ) For almost a decade, your City staff has addressed every comment it has received on the environmental review of Poseidon's project No criticism has been ignored, unheard or discounted, let alone"swept under the rug" during the exhaustive analysis of this project's potential environmental impacts "Stubborn problems" and "serious criticisms" have been openly discussed and publicly dissected repeatedly, in meeting after meeting Once again, an exhaustive document has been prepared (the Final SEIR includes the City's responses to hundreds and hundreds of comments - in fact, one comment letter included 347 separate comments) Most of the comments received on the SEIR are not new to those of us who have been involved in the process since the beginning However, every comment has been addressed I suspect that there may be last minute commentary offered at your meeting tonight Predictably, some will call for more time and further studies But it has been clear since the inception of CEQA in the 1970`s that the City does not need to "conduct every test and perform all research, study, and experimentation recommended to it" by interested parties (Society for California Archaeology v County of Butte (1977) 65 Cal App 3d 832, 838 ) The key is whether the potential environmental impacts of the project have been disclosed and discussed in the SEIR The California Supreme Court has explained that in deciding whether a legal analysis has been provided by an EIR, the test is not "whether the studies are irrefutable or whether they could have been better" Obviously, experts may disagree on some points (Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay Committee v Board of Port Commissioners (2001) 91 Cal App 4th 1344, 1356, quoting Laurel Heights 147 Cal 3d at 409) The test is whether the potential environmental impacts of the project have been disclosed and discussed in the SEIR Poseidon Position Statement on SEIR September 7, 2010 Page 3 All of the Project's potentially significant environmental effects have been disclosed and discussed in the SEIR and, where applicable, mitigation measures to reduce such effects to a level of insignificance have been identified The SEIR therefore meets all of the legal requirements imposed under CEQA Please recognize that your City staff, the City Attorney's office, the City's experts, the Poseidon team of scientists and consultants, and the interested citizenry have all invested significant time in examining the potential environmental impacts of this important project Finally, please do not hesitate to call on me if I can assist in your understanding of the evidence or the application of CEQA to your determinations Very truly yours, W140-- Ronald A Van Blarcom cc S Malom R• I� i 1 FILED 2 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALI,FORMA COUNTY OF O�W,10= CLNT.CVL IJSTICE CENTER 3 BAN Q 5 Z007 [} A LAN SLATER Clerk of fhb COurt ELECTRONICALLY 0- �yy,j , 'n lj{J( 5 RECEIVED BY C CARR {� SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORMA COUNTY OF ORAwLiF_ 6 CNIL COMPLEX CENTER Dec 05 2006 7 ALAN SLATER,Clerk of the Court 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALI17ORNIA 9 COUNTS'OF ORANGE 10 CA 71L COMPLEX CENTER JUDICIAL DISTRICT I 12 SURFRIDER FOUNDATION CASE NO. 06CCO0063 1JUNTINGTON-SEAL BEACH CHAPTER, 13 THE SIERRA CLUB ANGELES CHAPTER, fASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO JUDGE and DOES I through 5,inclusive DAVID C VELASQUEZ,DEFT CX101] 14 Petitioners, WkMeSERLSTATEMENT OF DECISION 15 v. Action Filed: April 3,2006 16 Heanng Date. November 27,2006 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,and Time 9.00 a m. 17 DOES 6-10,inclusive, is Respondents, l 19 and 20 POSEIDON RESOURCES CORPORATION;AES HUNTINGTON 21 BEACH,LLC,and DOES 11 through 15, inclusive, I 22 Real Parties in Interest. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Il OCSC CASE NO 06CCOOD63 [PROPOSED]STATEMENT OF DECISION I i i I This matter came before the Court on November 27,2006, for liearung on 2 Petitioners Surfiider Foundation Huntington-Seal Beach Chapter and the Sierra Ciub Angeles 3 Chapter's Petition for Writ of Mandate Respondent City of Huntington Beach and Real fatties 4 ;in Interest Poseidon Resources Corporation and AES Huntington Beach,LLC opposed the 5 ` Petition All parties submitted their briefs in a timely fashion and presented oral arguments at i 6 the hearing Ilaving reviewed those briefs and the arguments presented by counsel at the 7 hearing,the Court denied the writ for the following reasons i 8 1 Evidentiary Issues i 9 Petitioners' requests for judicial notice are denied The proffered evidence is riot 10 the kind of matter of which the court can take judicial notice under either Evidence Code§§415 11 or 452 The provision of California Code of Civtl.Procedure§1094.5(e)do not permit this court ! 12 to consider evidence which was not before the administrative agency and was not part of the 13 administrative record (Western,States Petroleum v Superior Court(1995)9 Cal.4th 559.) 14 Real parties'in interest request for judicial notice is denied The proffered 15 evidence is not the kind of matter of which the court can take judicial notice under either 16 Evidence Code §§451 or 452. 17 Discussion 18 Under CEQA,an environmental impact report("R&)is piesuined adequate and 19 the burden of persuasion is on the party contesting its adequacy. The court finds the respondent 20 did not abuse its discretion in certifying the Recirculated Environmental Impact Report 21 ("REM!);respondent proceeded to the manner required by law,its decision is supported by the 22 findings and the findings are supported by substantial evidence in light of the record as a whole. 23 Impaact of the Project Independent of the Generating Station 24 Petitioners fail to present admissible evidence the Clean Water Act will certainly 25 require in the future either the termination of the once-through water cooling system,or 26 I reduction of the amount of intake water The record supports the inference respondent has 27 several compliance options which will not necessarily require cessation of the once-through 28 1 cooling system Petitioners do not explain why the evidence in the record is insufficient to A OCSC CASE NO 06CCOD063 [PROPOSED]STATEMENI OF DECISION r I support a finding that the"the best technology available"could not include the present cooling 2 system. Further,substantial evidence supports the finding that the desalinization ro ect water Ys � pp � p J 3 pumps will not operate independently of the generation station The petitioners'conclusions of 4 impact of the Clean Water Act §316 on the project are entirely speculative 5 Feasible Alternatives 6 Respondents have adequately considered a range of alternatives which could 7 feasibly attain the project's objectives and avoid or lessen the significant impacts caused by the 8 project There is substantial evidence m the record respondent considered and rejected 9 alternatives which did not meet the project's objectives or did not lessen the environmental 10 impact of the project For example,the record supports the finding that the"No Project" 11 alternative does not meet the project's objectives and would allow the present health hazards 12 associated with current site conditions to continue. The i educed project alternative would not 13 substantially lessen the temporary or long term impacts of the project. 14 Recirculation of the REIR 15 Petitioners have not established that new information was added to the REIR 16 which deprived the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse I 17 environmental impact caused by the project,or to comment upon a feasible means to mitigate the , 18 effect of the project. Substantial evidence supports the finding the Final Entrainment and 19 Impingement Report does not contain new evidence of a substantial environmental impact 20 Petitioners have not explained how the inclusion of the final report deprived the public of the 21 ability to comment upon it 22 Growth Inducing,Impact of the Protect 23 The report adequately discusses potential population growth in Orange County 24 influenced by the project The REIR contains a general analysis of the possible impact of the ' 25 project upon growth and housing. The general distribution of the water to potential water 26 companies is described in the report. It does not appear that further forecast of the impact of the 27 project upon the level of growth caused by the delivery of water to end users is possible. This is 28 primarily the case because the treated water is not intended to be delivered by the project ! OCSC CASE NO. 06CO00063 2 [PROPOSED]STATEMENT OF DFCISIONT i l ' I operators directly to end users The maximum number of additional persons who could be 2 served because of the project has been reasonably estimated The record supports the finding the 3 respondent cannot better estimate the number of additional end users who could be served by the , 4 project Ovei all,substantial evidence exists in the record to support the finding that the addition i 5 of the water treated through the project through the county distribution system would not 6 increase growth more than is already planned for 7 ( Deferred Miti b2ij Measures P t Impacts 8 The record supports the finding the respondent has already eominitted itself to 9 I clear mitigation measures despite the fact it requires the project to prepare an acoustical analysis 10 report before any building permit will be issued for the project Respondent has identified the 11 standard by which the project must comply in designing the project to mitigate noise and 12 biological impacts The record supports the inference the respondent is requiring a project 13 design which must insure noise levels in compliance with lawful levels set by the respondent for 14 a project of this kind before any construction may proceed (Cf Rio Rasta Farm Bureau Ctr v 4 15 f County of Solano(1992)5 Cal.App.4th 351;Laurel Heights Improvement Assn v.Regents of 16 I Univ of Cal (1993)6 Cal 4th 1112;Defend the Bay v City of Irvine(2004) 119 Cal. App,4th 17 1261.) The mitigation efforts pointed out by the petitioners dealing with noise primarily relate to 18 ,I the temporary impact of the project during its construction The remaining mitigation measure 19 relates to an off site facility. 20 Moreover,respondent argues the issue of deferred mitigation was not raised in the 21 administrative proceedings (Resources Code§21167;Banker's Ildl, Hillcrest,Park West Cmty 22 Preservation Group v City of San Diego(2006) 139 Cal App 4th 249.) Petitioners offer no 23 reply to that argument. Therefore,the issue is not preserved for review herein. 24 Statement of Overriding Benefit;Evidence of Need for the Protect 25 Petitioners complain the project should not have been approved because there is I 26 no need for it. Petitioners present no authority in support of their contention a project may be 27 rejected because there no general need for it. The record supports the inference respondent was 28 informed of environmental concerns when it approved the project. The respondent's statement OCSC CASE NO: 06CC00063 3 [PROPOSED)STATEMENT OF DECISION ' r i 1 ' of overriding benefits adequately states the competing interests of the City in balance against the 2 temporary,unmitigated impacts of the project on wr quality during construction of the project. 3 4 'I 5 j b fi 7j s 0 0 EW 9 t dudge of t:i9 W, Su p no `ti Ft hAT _ 11 12 13 14 r 15 16 f 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ! 26 ' 27 28 OCSC CASE NO: 06CCO0063 4 [PROPOSED]STATEMENT OF DECISION CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Inter-Department Communication Planning and Building Department TO: Honorable Mayor and City ncil Members VIA: Fred Wilson, City Admi 1 r FROM: Scott Hess,AICP, Directo of Planning and Buildini DATE: September 7, 2010 SUBJECT: POSEIDON LATE COMMUNICATION—RESPONSE TO STATE LANDS COMMISSION STAFF LETTER TO CITY COUNCIL DATED SEPTEMBER 3, 2010 State Lands Commission staff submitted a letter dated September 3, 2010 to the City Council (Attachment No 1) Also attached is the response to the subject letter(Attachment No 2) SH•MBB RR jr xc Joan Flynn, City Clerk Bob Hall, Deputy City Administrator Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner Jan Richards, Administrative Assistant Cathy Fikes, Administrative Assistant 91-;7-/o b4-AF 60M.*V"'V1 d.J G\AdmLtr\2010\090710RR3(Poseidon Late Comm)doc 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,Governor CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION PAUL D.THAYER, Executive Officer 100 Howe Avenue Suite 100-South (916)574-1800 FAX(916)574-1810 Sacramento, CA 95825-8202 California Relay Service from TDD Phone 1-800-735-2929 from voice Phone 1-800-735-2922 fbad Contact Phone: (916)574-1880 Contact FAX: (916)574-1885 September 3, 2010 File Ref SCH#2001051092 The Honorable Cathy Green, Mayor, and City Council Members City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject- Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) fo(the Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach (State Clearinghouse No 2001051092) Dear Mayor Green and City Council Members Staff of the California State Land Commission (Commission) has reviewed the subject FSEIR and City staff's responses to our comment letters on June 21 and July 1, 2010, and remains concerned that the FSEIR's analysis of impacts to marine biological resources and the public trust uses and values of the Pacific Ocean is inadequate Commission staff understands that the City is the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and that it plans to consider adopting the FSEIR on September 7, 2010. The Commission staff requests that the FSEIR be revised to ensure its adequacy under CEQA For background, the Commission has jurisdiction and management authority over the portions of the proposed project analyzed in the FSEIR—the construction and operation by Poseidon Resources Corporation (Poseidon) of a 50 million gallon per day 2 (MGD) seawater desalination facility—that are located on State sovereign lands, including the seawater intake and brine discharge systems Such tide and submerged lands are impressed with the Common Law Public Trust, which is a sovereign public property right held by the State. Any development, leases, or franchises, involving said lands must be consistent with the terms of the Common Law Public Trust On June 17, 2010, the Commission received a lease application from Poseidon for its proposed Huntington Beach Desalination project Under CEQA, the Commission is both a Responsible and Trustee Agency for the proposed project Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15096, the Commission must consider the City-prepared FSEIR and reach its own conclusions on whether or how to approve the project involved ATTACHMENT NO. Mayor and City Council Members September 3, 2010 City of Huntington Beach Despite detailed responses to comments by City staff, the Commission staff continues to have difficulty understanding some of the analyses presented, and conclusions reached, in the FSEIR related to the following issues. • Entrainment of marine species during seawater intake • Elevated concentration of salinity in the discharge plume These issues are of paramount concern should the desalination facility operate in stand-alone mode (e g , if the Huntington Beach Generating Station [HBGS] discontinued operations) g, Fish Shellfish and Larvae Entrainment 1 The FSEIR analysis of project-related impingement mortality and entrainment i (ME) impacts is based on one year of sampling data from 2003-2004 City staff concludes that"the sampling data collected from the 2003-2004 iM&E study I are the most current and statistically accurate data available to evaluate the proposed stand-alone desalination plant's impingement impacts" (FSEIR, page 12-710 &711) City staff rules out other sampling data, specifically, the annual HBGS NPDES impingement monitoring reports, for the following reasons o "Due to the highly variable, episodic nature of fish impingement, sampling C must be more frequent than once a month in order to collect a statistically SJ significant representative sample of daily impingement rates" (FSEIR, page 12-710) o The annual impingement monitoring reports required by the HBGS' NPDES permit do not provide a statistically representative sample of impingement to accurately project the proposed stand-alone desalination project's impingement impacts" (FSEIR, page 12-711) These responses, however, do not address Commission staff's concern that the 2003-2004 IM&E data—data collected over a one- year period more than six years ago—also may not provide a statistically representative sample of impingement and entrainment associated with a multi-year proposed project that could operate under different intake flow volumes, oceanic conditions, and regional fish density conditions than that experienced in 2003-2004 Elevated Salinities in the Discharr,�e Plume and Subsequent Fish Avoidance ® The FSEIR acknowledges that potential impacts of the proposed project include displacement of species, depressed community diversity, and avoidance by species as a result of elevated salinities associated with discharges from the / desalination facility, but concludes that these project-related impacts would be tt� less than significant This conclusion is based in part on a Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board determination that there is not a reasonable potential for acute toxicity effects to occur below a concentration of 40 parts per thousand (ppt) (FSEIR page 12-599) The Commission staff remains concerned that the non-toxic, but potentially significant, impact of fish avoidance through and in the area of the project's highly-saline discharge plume is not adequately analyzed in the FSEIR 2 P+TTACH M T Igo Z Mayor and City Council Members September 3, 2010 City of Huntington Beach Selective Use of intake and Discharge Volumes When Analyzing Impingement and Elevated Salinity Impacts ® Analyses of impingement and entrainment impacts.in the FSEIR appear to be based on a127 MGD intake volume if all other variables are the same, lower intake volumes could result in less impingement and entrainment than higher volumes After the proposed withdrawal of an allowed maximum of 50 MGD for potable water, the volume of discharge water would approximate 77 MGD 127 MGD (intake) —50 MGD (potable water production) = 77 MGD (discharge) i For example, page 4 10-62 of Section 4 10 (Ocean Water Quality and Marine F Biological Resources) states that "[c]onservative assumptions of HBGS volumes of 127 MGD were used for developing the estimates of potential larvae losses due to desalination facility impacts " (See "A" below ) On the same page, the EIR states that the minimum intake flow used to estimate larval fish entrainment is 127 MGD (See "B" below) Seawater Lisa imatbn Praec€at Hurstington t3each 41 b Dcaan Water Quality and Draft Subsequent EnvironmentsIImp-act Repor:r Marine Bfolp icalResources L-....1 standing stock of larvae in the defined souttewater.Tidal exchange ratios,source water volurnes, cooiingwatervolumes,larval concentrations,and larval duration&ware van ables used in the ETM calculations. Conservative assumptions of 81l volumes of 127 MOD were used for developing the estimates of potential larvae losses due to desalinratlon facitlby operations. Under PEGS minimum Intake coolingwater flow of 127 PAGD,and assumirig100 percent through- HBGS larval mortality{based on USEPA 2004y,the estimated larval fish entrainrnant loss is 0 33 percent of the total population of larvae in the local area surrounding the 148GS intake B Based on in-facility testing,the observed mortality of HBGS is 94 1 percent and the combined estimatedmortaiity(uhlaing the ETM)of the project and 148GS at flmwvslof 507 MOD would be 95 3 percent fan increase in mortality of 1 2 percent due to the proposed desalination facility)and 98 7 percent at HBGS flows of 127 MOD(an increase in mortality of 4 6 percent due to the proposed desalination facility) This assessment assumes 100 percent mortaiity of all or>ganisma upon vnthc1m gal into the desalination facility_ In contrast, page 4 10-26 states that (1) "under stand-alone conditions, discharge flows will be maintained at a near-constant 102 MGD (a correction of the 152 MGD volumes stated in the Draft SEIR, see "C" below) After withdrawing the proposed allowable maximum of 50 MGD for potable water, the volume of intake water under this scenario would need to be 152 MGD If all other variables are the same, higher discharge volumes could result in lower salinity concentrations than lower discharge volumes 162 MGD (intake) —50 MGD (potable water production) = 102 MGD (discharge) li Page 4.10-26: r With the stand-alone operation conditions, discharge volumes would be less variable I G l than HBGS discharge volumes Under stand-alone conditions, discharge flows will i---i be maintained at a near-constant +52 1U MGD when the desalination facility is operating at its 50 MGD potable water production capacity Under the approved co- located operations, discharge flows vary, as power production at HBGS (and thus discharge flows)vary depending on grid-based electrical supply and demand 3 ATTACHMENT NO. .3 Mayor and City Council Members September 3, 2010 City of Huntington Beach Conclusions Commission staff is concerned about the FSEIR's inadequate analysis of impacts to marine biological resources and public trust uses and values Specifically* ® Analyses of project-related impingement mortality and entrainment impacts are based on one year(2003-2004) of sampling data, Y ® The impact of fish completely avoiding the discharge plume is not analyzed; and ® Analyses of impacts to marine biological resources related to fish impingement and entrainment appear to be based on a lower intake volume than the volume of intake water needed to maintain the higher discharge volumes used to calculate the salinity of the discharge plume If all other variables are the same, lower intake volumes could result in less impingement and entrainment than higher volumes, while higher discharge volumes could result in lower salinity concentrations than lower discharge volumes. Commission staff requests that the FSE1R for the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination project, which the City plans to consider whether or not to adopt on September 7, be revised so that City staff can resolve the above-stated issues in a timely manner Please note that the Commission as a Responsible and Trustee Agency must approve or disapprove a development project (in this case a lease for the offshore portions of the proposed project) within 180 days from the date the Lead Agency approves the project, or within 180 days from the date the application was received and accepted as complete by Commission staff, whichever is later If the FSEIR is certified q by the City, and Poseidon completes its application to the Commission, Commission t staff will bring the application to the Commission as quickly as possible The following are some of the circumstances that may cause Commission staff to recommend to the Commission approval or denial of a project application 1 Whether or not the applicant furnished requested additional information 2 Environmental considerations, 3 Compliance with statutory requirements, 4 Consistency or inconsistency with Public Trust restrictions, resources, or values If you have any questions or need more information, please feel free to contact Steven Mindt at (916) 574-1497 or steven mindt(5),sic ca qov or me at (916) 574-1880 or at cy_oct ig ns(a7_slc ca gov Sincerely, 0_�/"_�- Cy R Oggin hief Division of Environmental Planning and Management cc David W Smith, U S EPA Tom Luster, CCC Joanna Jensen, SWQCB 4 hTTACH T N0. `� Responsel City staff appreciates the opportunity to correct the CSLC's misunderstanding about the project and SEIR As noted in the responses provided below to the specific comments raised in the letter, the City believes that the FSEIR is adequate, and does not require any revisions Response 2 This comment contains background information regarding the jurisdiction and responsibilities of the California State Lands Commission (CSLC) and does not comment on the environmental analysis The information provided in this comment is consistent with the characterization of the CSLC's jurisdiction and permitting authority presented in the FSEIR Response 3 This comment contains background information regarding the application submitted to CSLC by Poseidon, and information on the responsibilities of the California State Lands Commission (CSLC) and does not comment on the environmental analysis Response 4 The City appreciates that the CSLC is bringing to its attention that CSLC staff is having "difficulty understanding some of the analysis presented and conclusions reached in the SEIR" Additional clarification is provided below Response 5 The comment appears to confuse the statistical significance of data with the time frame within which data were collected Specifically, the comment previously provided by CSLC in their July 1, 2010 DSEIR comment letter expresses concern that information collected in 2008 monitoring studies was not used in the SEIR, and states that the 2008 data represent "the most current information and conditions" regarding impingement However, as noted in the FSEIR responses to comments, the 2008 data are simply not adequate for use in a comprehensive analysis of impingement and entrainment because the data are not collected at a statistically appropriate sampling frequency and therefore do not meet regulatory standards for sampling accuracy The FSEIR responses to comments also informed the CSLC that the 2003-2004 Impingement and Entrainment study incorporates the same protocols for data collection that are utilized by other approved intake study designs for California's OTC power plants required to comply with provisions of the 316(b) Phase II regulations of the Clean Water Act The HBGS 2003-2004 study was required by the California Energy Commission study plan, and reviewed and approved by R York and D Stone, California Energy Commission, T Luster, California Coastal Commission, P Raimondi, University California Santa Cruz, M Foster and G Cailliet, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, B Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service, B Paznokas, California Department of Fish and Game, N Davis, Chambers Group, P Hurt and R Tripp, AES The current comment by CSLC now adds a concern that because of the age of the data that were used in the SEIR studies, the statistical significance is compromised, stating as a rationale that the project is multi-year, subject to different intake flow conditions and ocean conditions Regarding different intake flow conditions, it should be noted that the two potential operating conditions of the project (co-located and stand-alone) were both analyzed in the impingement and entrainment studies Under the HBGS NPDES permit ATTACHMENT NO., 2" 1 (Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No R8-2006-0011), one of the stated reasons for requiring collection of monitoring data for the HBGS is to assure compliance with the CWA Section 316(b) Phase II regulations and with relevant State policy for implementing those regulations The 2003/2004 data were relied upon to issue Order No R8-2006-0011 The monitoring data from 2005 through 2008 were substantially consistent with the original study, such that no revocation or modification of Order No R8-2006-0011 resulted Therefore, the 2005-2008 data were consistent with the 2003/2004 data, for purposes of compliance by the HBGS with the stringent requirements of CWA Section 316(b) Response 6 It is difficult for the City to provide any additional response to CSLC on the concerns expressed in this comment because no information or scientific evidence is offered or provided by CSLC on what additional potential effects beyond what was analyzed in the SEIR could result from elevated salinities in the water column The SEIR analyzes the issue, and indicates that no substantial adverse effects would result due to the ability of pelagic fishes to avoid unfavorable conditions, and the limited duration of contact with elevated salinities (see pages 4 10-39-40, and 4 10-55-56) Therefore, the potentially significant impact is avoided, and no additional analysis is required under CEQA Response 7 As with its previous comment letters, the CSLC staff appears to be confusing the co- located and stand-alone operating scenario analysis in the DSEIR The comment is correct in stating that the volume of discharge under the two potential operating scenarios is Co-located = 77 MGD discharge volume Stand-alone = 102 MGD discharge volume However, the DSEIR pages cited in the CSLC comment letter (i e , 4 10-62 and 4 10-26) are analyzing two different operating scenarios What the comment fails to acknowledge is that, as noted in the DSEIR, while the larger dilution volumes associated with the stand-alone operating condition would provide for more overall dilution, the fact that the stand-alone discharge is unheated results in different mixing characteristics because the discharge is less buoyant in an unheated, stand-alone condition (see Section 4 10-20, 4 10-26) Also as stated in the DSEIR, the primary concern with the unheated discharge is that is sinks to the sea floor more rapidly, and without additional dilution, would result in a slightly larger area subject to salinity effects on the sea floor than would occur with a heated discharge As indicated by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board in its June 30, 2010 DSEIR comment letter, the additional dilution for the unheated (stand-alone) condition may not be required to meet federal and state regulatory requirements Response 8 See previous responses The third bullet of this comment raises an issue that was not clearly stated in the previous comment In response to this specific issue, the DSEIR provides a complete analysis of impingement and entrainment effects on the stand-alone condition, to the same level of detail as it does for the co-located condition Response 9 ATTACI 'ME KIT NO, City staff does not believe that revisions to the FSEIR are necessary, nor is any delay in certifying the FSEIR necessary, because all of the information and analysis requested in this letter is contained in the FSEIR, which fully complies with the requirements of CEQA ATTACHMENT O. �'� Esparza, Patty From: Flynn, Joan Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1 22 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: FW Poseidon Entitlements- Update Late communications From: Hess, Scott Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:21 PM To: Flynn, Joan, Lugar, Robin Subject: FW• Poseidon Entitlements - Update fyi From: Hess, Scott Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1:17 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Cc: Wilson, Fred, Hall, Bob, Broeren, Mary Beth Subject: Poseidon Entitlements - Update Mayor and Council Members, As you know, there are three planning entitlements scheduled before you this evening related to the Poseidon project They are the Subsequent EIR, Entitlement Plan Amendment (amending the previously approved Conditional Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit), and a Tentative Parcel Map Late last week we received a letter from Coastal Commission staff advising that the previously approved Coastal Development Permit cannot be amended because it has been appealed to the Coastal Commission As a result of the letter, the applicant has requested that a new Coastal Development Permit be processed. In order to properly notice the new Coastal Development Permit, it will be scheduled for a separate City Council public hearing on September 20, 2010 along with the Tentative Parcel Map The recommendation for the SEIR and amendment to the Conditional Use Permit will not be changed for tonight. If you have any questions, please let me know Thanks, Scott Hess, Director Planning and Building Dept 536-5554 Id CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Inter-Department Communication Planning and Building Department TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members VIA: Fred Wilson, City Administrator FROM: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Builds DATE: September 2, 2010 SUBJECT: POSEIDON LATE COMMUNICATION David Hamilton contacted staff recently regarding a third comment letter he submitted on the Poseidon Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) which staff did not have and was therefore not included in the Final SEIR recently provided to you Mr Hamilton provided another copy of his third comment letter which is attached for your information along with the corresponding response Please contact Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager, at ext 5550 or Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner, at ext 5624 if you have any questions SH MBB RR jr xc Joan Flynn, City Clerk Bob Hall, Deputy City Administrator Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager Ricky Ramos, Senior Planner Jan Richards, Administrative Assistant Cathy Fikes, Administrative Assistant i C� a� DO Lc�t/r�-i-7 vN G\AdmLtr\2010\09021 ORRI (Poseidon Late Comm)doc EM David E Hamilton 5401 Kenilworth Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Phone (714)840-8901 E-mail de hmdton@version net June 11,2010 City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Attn R Ramos Via fax 714-374-1647 Re. Poseidon Resources Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report(DSEIR) Dear Mr Ramos, The subject Draft SEIR states in Section 1 0,page 1-30 "The Growth Assessment and Geneial Plan Evaluation examine planned growth in Orange County and demonstrates that the potential water supply from the Seawater Desalmation Project at Huntington Beach is not currently being relied upon to serve any new development projects of 500 dw elling units for which water supplies have been confinned,. The above statement is contradicted in the Ul'ater Supply Assessment of the Beach-Edinger Corridor HAM13-1 Specific Plan EIR where in Section 7 1 1 desahnated water from the Poseidon project is listed among probable Sources of supply for Beach-Edinger Corridor project The Beach-Edinger Corridor Specific Plan was approved in March 2010 Section 7 1 1,page 7 2 of the WS4 states "Desalination is a viable water supply for Huntington Beach at this time " Farther along in the Section 7 1 1, second paragraph states "Poseidon Resources Corporation (Poseidon) is the project applicant/proponent for a desalination facility in Huntington Beach and the City has entered into an agreement with Poseidon" And the entire thud paragraph of the IVSd ` ;2 Summary of Plan for Obtaining Sufficient Supply"states `Huntington Beach as the w ater provider to the project area has put forth adequate due diligent evaluations that show good faith efforts in both short and long-term water supply planning Environmental review was completed for a desalination facility and the City has entered into agreements with Poseidon the desalination proponent The City has also granted its approNal of the desalination facility' HAM13-2 Furthermore, the subject Draft SEIR repeatedly references the desahmated product water as `replacement water" for various determinations, e g greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 'Ahereas, for the ITIS_4 for the Beach-Edingei Corridoi Specific Plan EIR iefers to the desalinated product water as `new water supply" This is far more than a rhetoi ical difference for it goes to the most detrimental and significant of en%ironmental impacts of the desalination piolect—greenhouse gas emissions, global climate change, and California's AB32 compliance The SEIR should not be considered adequate until all of the above discrepancies are reconciled.corrected, HAM13-3 and related project modifications are made Regai ds, David I lamilton Huntington Beach Resident de hamilim av,,rizou lac, Ph (-14) 840-8901 HAMIL.TON, DAVID (HAM13), JUNE 11, 2010 HAM13-1 As noted in Section 7 0 of the Water Supply Assessment for the Beach- Edinger Corridors Specific Plan, the conclusion that water supplies may be insufficient to meet projected demands is primarily due to recent State Water Project cutbacks related to the pumping restrictions, and a multi- year three statewide drought The study did not anticipate or contemplate that these conditions would be permanent Moreover, while seawater desalination is discussed in Section 711 of the report, the recommendations of the study that are contained in Section 8 of the report to help balance the regional supply and demand situations over the next 20 years, do not rely on seawater desalination as means to achieve such a balance Instead, the report recommends measures that include conservation and water efficiency measures, as well as investigating use of reclaimed water and urban runoff Therefore, the statements in the DSEIR which characterize the project's product water as a replacement of existing imported supplies is not contradicted by the conclusions and recommendations of the Water Supply Assessment for the Beach-Edinger Corridors Specific Plan HAM13-2 See Response HAM13-1 The project will supply 56,000 afy to the participating water purveyors in Orange County, providing a direct, one- to-one replacement of imported water to meet the requirements of those participating water agencies, and thus eliminating the need to pump 56,000 acre-feet of water into Orange County Therefore, the energy required for the project would be net of that required to import water to the region, and the calculation of net energy use is reasonable and appropriate for purposes of calculating greenhouse gas emissions HAM13-3 As noted in Response HAM13-1, there are no discrepancies in the DSEIR raised in this comment letter, and therefore, no reconciliation, corrections to the DSEIR, or modifications to the project are necessary or required From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 1 43 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 6385 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Mary Jo Baretich Description: City Council Members City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: POSEIDON DESALINATION PLANT SEIR Dear Council Members, This email addresses important environmental concerns regarding the effects of Noise Pollution in close proximity to the proposed Poseidon facility, and several inadequacies noted in the SEIR According to the SEIR, current construction activities in the immediate vicinity show a higher upper noise decibel range and peak out at 101.95 dBA. The construction of the project site and the following pipeline (which is to take approximately 27 months to build), pose unacceptably high noise limits on the residents in the project area and along the proposed pipeline. SEIR Appendix F (p F-14) incorrectly states that noise impacts from construction traffic would be less than significant. since construction activities would take place during allowable daytime hours (7 00 AM to 8:00 PM),would be short-term, and would cease upon project completion According to the SEIR Appendix F Table N-6 (p F-11), the noise levels generated by construction equipment ranges from 77 dBA to 85 dBA. The SEIR further states that a 20 dBA reduction could be achieved with buildings having their windows closed Are they implying that the residents keep their windows closed so the plant construction will be in compliance? The heavy equipment will not be used inside buildings, so the implication is that the residents' buildings are the one being referenced. Will sensitive receptors be placed inside homes?" This is an excerpt from Appendix F,page F-12• "A typical building can reduce noise levels by 20 dBA with the windows closed. This noise reduction could be maintained only on a temporary basis in some cases, since it assumes windows would remain closed at all times. Therefore,this analysis utilizes an interior level of 65 dBA as a criterion level for determining significance for construction related activities in order to evaluate construction noise related impacts on nearby sensitive receptors " "Thus, construction noise associated with the proposed project would not expose surrounding sensitive receptors to noise levels in excess of the Speech Interference Criteria(65 dBA) during 1 construction " The constant droning of pumps 24 hours a day, 7 days per week has been shown in studies to have negative effects on humans and animals. Residents in close proximity to the project have genuine concerns about the effects of noise on their wellbeing. Why would we want to build a project close to residences and wetlands that would impact the health of humans and animals in any way? The SEIR in both Section 4 5 and Appendix F acknowledges that noise can affect human health, and that even moderate noise levels can produce disruptive after-effects, such as noise-induced hearing loss, effects on noise-induced sleep interference, noise stress factors, communication problems, performance and behavior changes, hypertension, increase in hostile behavior, and annoyance Approximately 10 percent of people living in industrialized areas have substantial hearing loss The SEIR Section 4.5 and Appendix F attempt to hypothetically analyze project-related noise impacts on the site and to surrounding land uses, primarily aimed at humans. The SEIR uses a special frequency-dependent rating scale to relate noise to human sensitivity , which is an A-weighted decibel scale (dBA) The desalination equipment , including the electric pumps emit various ranges of frequencies The pump Horse Power as noted in the SEIR Appendix F (p F-17)ranges from 350 rpm to 7500 rpm. This equates to a Combined Sound Level (frequency and decibel)between 100 dBA to 108 dBA Using frequency conversion calculations, it appears that the frequencies emitting from the pumps range from 5 83 Hz to 125Hz. Human hearing ranges in frequency between 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz Birds have a wider frequency range of hearing, between 1Hz and 40,OOOHz. Bats upper frequency is around 120,000 Hz. Relating to SEIR Section 4 5 Noise, Table 4 5-6, which presents the combined noise levels (decibels) from all pumps, according to the SEIR,the pump noise levels would be potentially significant because they would exceed the City's applicable exterior noise standards, which are 55 dBA between 7 AM and 10 PM, and 50 dBA between 10 PM and 7 AM. These pumps will be running 24 hours per day, and 7 days per week It is imperative that the Mitigation Measure NOI-1 noted in the SEIR be implemented if this project is approved. NOI-1 only requires the reduction by 20 dBA. This may not be enough Noise is technically described in terms of the loudness (amplitude) of the sound and frequency(pitch) of the sound The standard unit of measurement of loudness is the decibel The human ear decibel rating scales were used in this SEIR Section 4.5 "Decibels are based on the logarithmic scale. In terms of human response to noise, a sound 1 OdBA higher than another is judged to be twice as loud, and a 20dBA higher is four times as loud, and so forth. Sounds in the 30dBA range are considered very quiet. 100 dBA is considered very loud " Noise and vibration impacts from construction and plant operation will not only affect the residents near the desalination plant, but also will affect the nesting and foraging habits of birds, bats and other animals in the near proximity of the proposed facility According to the SEIR Ground-Borne Vibration can be significant up to 500 feet or less from the source. There are wetlands present less than 100 feet from the facility It is extremely important that construction be avoided during breeding and nesting 2 seasons In order to reduce impacts, it is recommended that a thorough study be conducted by qualified Biologists or Ornithologists to assess current status of resident bird species near the proposed site prior to approval of this project Future studies need to be made of movement, mortality, behavior changes, and abundance of local species,to gauge any impact from the proposed project Any increase in ambient noise and frequencies can significantly affect the local wildlife. Birds, bats and small creatures communicating in the vicinity of the proposed Poseidon facility may be unable to communicate distress or mating calls effectively Ambient noises, especially those with similar frequencies, can significantly mask a bird's song, affecting such aspects as its amplitude, frequency, rhythm, timbre, and call band-width. Clear song transmission is critical to most birds because their reproductive success may depend on it. Song is important in resolving conflicts between males, allowing them to maintain their territories and repel intruders During the critical juvenile period of song learning. "Juveniles living in noisier areas may not hear, and thus not learn to sing the low-frequency notes of the previous generation So song sparrows have to sing at a higher frequency and louder in a noisy environment Singing loudly does have a cost- increased rates of oxygen consumption and energy expenditure. Also, the birds are more apt to be caught by a predator Two key metrics for measuring the effects of noise on animals are as follows: The first, "alerting distance," is the distance at which sounds can be heard. These may be sounds made by a species to alert others to danger, or sounds made by predators (which the prey animals want to hear, so as to take cover). The second, is "listening area,"the full area around an animal in which it can hear other animals' calls, footsteps, and wing beats A key insight offered by this approach is that even moderate increases in background noise (from nearby roads,pumps, and generators) can drastically reduce an animal's listening area For example, an owl needs to be able to acutely hear a mouse burrowing under the grasses The following is a quote from Karen Trevino, director of the National Park Service's Natural Sounds Program Center "Noise increases exponentially, not linearly In any given area an increase of three decibels reduces our ability to hear by 50 percent. That means that if I can hear a bird singing 100 feet away and a noise intrusion raises the ambient baseline by 3 decibels, I would have to move to within 70 feet of the bird to still hear it. People often assume that a 5- or 10-decibel increase is insignificant or barely noticeable That's not the case." There are existing wetlands to the northwest of the project. A survey documented by Richard Zembal shows this wetland is home to over 18 pairs of the endangered Belding's Savannah Sparrow The wetlands to the east and southeast of the proposed facility are also home to endangered and protected birds such as the Belding's Savannah Sparrow, the Coopers Hawk and the White Tailed Kite, in addition to other raptors, migratory and resident birds In the SEIR Section 4.1, Poseidon ineffectively attempts to state that they are in 3 compliance with the Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program Policies C7.1 3, and C7.1.4 and Land Use Element Policy LU 5.1 1 But the project is not in compliance, in that this project is being developed adjacent to environmentally sensitive habitat areas, and will impact these areas with noise and vibrations above the ambient levels. An inadequate buffer zone is planned According to HC LCP C7.1.4, 'Buffer zones shall be a minimum of one hundred feet setback from the landward edge of the wetland or greater to ensure that the most sensitive species will not be disturbed significantly by permitted development, based on habitat requirements of both resident and migratory species and the short and long term adaptability of various species to human disturbance " In SEIR Section 4 5 Noise, Table 4 5-4, Sensitive Receptors are listed with their distance from the project site to the location of the Receptors in Residential areas, Schools and Edison Park There are no Sensitive Receptors located in the wetlands to the Northwest, the immediate East,the South or Southeast The Magnolia Wetlands and Talbert Channel are located directly East and Southeast of the proposed plant When the winds would be blowing from the West and Northwest direction, the noise from the desalination plant will be directed at the adjacent environmentally sensitive wetlands. This is unacceptable There is already day-time noise from the Pacific Coast Highway These wetlands would be sandwiched in between the desalination plant and the highway In addition, the wetlands Northwest of the proposed facility across Newland Street will also be impacted by the noise generated during the construction phase and the following operational facility Respectfully submitted, Mary Jo Baretich, President Cabrillo Wetlands Conservancy 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy #23A Huntington Beach, CA 92646 (714) 960-9507 )Expected Close Date: 09/07/2010 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored 4 From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 6 19 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6376 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Mary Jo Baretich Description: September 2, 2010 Re Poseidon SEIR Council Agenda Items 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, and 4-5 Dear City Council Members, I am writing this letter to ask you to please not approve Agenda Items 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, and 4-5 at the September 7, 2010 Council Meeting I have delineated my reasons below Do not adopt Agenda Item 4-1, Resolution No. 2010-63 Certifying the final SEIR No. 10-001 (Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project) The project has serious flaws, it does not adequately address environmental impacts, and should have all the discrepancies corrected that were delineated by the California Coastal Commission, Orange County Coastkeeper, and others in their Comments to the SEIR. Poseidon's responses to the comments on the SEIR were inadequate and dismissive There are far too many negative aspects to this project such as pipes running through contaminated groundwater and sensitive wetlands, destruction of local marine life, and massive energy use. In addition, the water is not for Huntington Beach It is for South Orange County Poseidon Resources, a private company has a record of failure It does not make good business sense to sign agreements with this company until they can prove their financial responsibility This project is extremely energy intensive, expensive and environmentally damaging. Do not approve Agenda Item 4-2, The Entitlement Plan Amendment(EPA)No 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM)No. 10-130 to amend Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit(CDP)No 02-05 because there are serious environmental problems associated with the new layout, as defined by the California Coastal Commission, Orange County Coastkeeper, and others in their Comments to the SEIR. For instance, the pump relocations closer to the wetlands and the mobilehome park are unacceptable Noise decibel levels will exceed the City limitations. Do not approve Agenda Item 4-3, The Amended and Restated Owner Participation Agreement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources (Surfside) LLC. Do not lock the City into an agreement before making sure all the SEIR corrections are addressed and solutions found, if solutions are possible. Do not approve Agenda Item 4-4, The Exchange Agreement/Lease Agreement and Escrow Instructions between the City of Huntington Beach and Poseidon Resources 1 (Surfside) LLC at this time. The project has serious flaws and should have the discrepancies corrected that were delineated by the California Coastal Commission, Orange County Coastkeeper, and others in their Comments to the SEIR Do not approve Agenda Item 4-5, Pipeline Franchise Agreement until the issues with the SEIR are addressed and solutions are found. The plans to run the pipelines adjacent to the worst contaminated lagoons of the Ascon Toxic Waste Dump are in themselves flawed Do not lock the City into something that has not been thoroughly investigated. The SEIR is seriously flawed in this instance Respectively, Mary Jo Baretich, President Cabrillo Wetlands Conservancy 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy #23A Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7618 mibaretichkhotmail com (714) 960-9507 Expected Close Date: 09/03/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. z From: Sue Berman [hypnosue@gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10 42 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. I look forward to hearing from you, Sue Berman 16701 Algonquin Street Huntington Beach, CA 92649 1 Esparza, Patty From: John Bmaski Dbinaski21@yahoo com] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 2 48 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject, Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report look forward to hearing from you, John Binaski 20121 Big Bend Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714 9626522 i From: Barbara Born [navigatetocreativity@webty net] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9 06 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Barbara Born PO BOX 752 Seal Beach, CA 90740 Esparza, Patty From Ramos, Ricky Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 124 PM To. Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 8:52 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW• Support for Poseidon From: Margaret Carlberg [mailto:mcariberg@ix netcom com] Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 10:35 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Support for Poseidon Honorable Mayor and Huntington Beach City Council Members, This is to voice my continued support for the Poseidon Water Resource project. The technology of reverse osmosis is feasible, and environmentally clean, and a good process to provide a new source of water we so desperately need in the future Margaret Carlberg, HB resident for 42 years i From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 39 PM To. CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 6359 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Melody Christensen Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come. Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Melody Christensen 21172 Shepherd Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-374-8554 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i From: Katie Chenderlin [ktshabatie@gmail com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 11 30 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair. These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Katie Chenderlin 1017 England Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 714-943-1874 1 From: debbra cooper[scooper@socal rr com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 16 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include- pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, debbra cooper 9372 malahine drive h b, CA 92646 714 9642876 From: scott cooper[hbcoops55@yahoo com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9 27 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon falls to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like Increased conservation, water recycling and Infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Scott cooper 9372 malahine dr huntington beach, CA 92646 7149642876 Esparza, Patter From: Cathleen Corey[coreyofaca@aol com] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 5 49 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report look forward to hearing from you, Cathleen Corey 8132 Pennington Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-916-4687 1 From: Lori Costigan [SeasideArt@aol com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 129 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Lori Costigan 21652 Seaside Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714 962-3422 Esparza, Patty From, Ramos, Ricky Sent. Tuesday, September 07, 2010 3 14 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: poseidon LC -----Original Message----- FromStephenson, Johanna Sent Tuesday, September 07, 2010 3 13 PM To Ramos, Ricky Cc Hall, Bob Subject FW poseidon support -----Original Message----- Frombillc4re@earthlink net [mailto billc4re@earthlink net] Sent Tuesday, September 07, 2010 3 11 PM To CITY COUNCIL Subject poseidon support To Whom It May Concern, My name is Bill Cuppy and I am a long term resident and business owner in Huntington Beach I support the Poseidon Desalination Facility alongside the current AES plant We need a good drought resistant supply of water and the additional benefit of tax income for the city makes this an easy decision to support Thank you, Bill Cuppy Bill Cuppy, Realtor DRE#01233220 ALTERA Real Estate 301 Main St Suite #112 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 714-473-1118 i From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent, Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7 58 AM To- CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6340 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Bob Fitzgerald Description: Dear HB City Council Members, As a resident of over 40 years in Huntington my family and I hope that you will support the Saltwater Desalination project under consideration. We believe it to be a necessary and prudent investment to our quality of life here in Huntington Beach My family and I plan on attending the council meeting on September 7th to show our support for this prof ect. Bob FrtzGerald moxiefitzgearthlink net Have a great day Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i From: Carol Evans [cevans4@socal rr com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6 45 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include. pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Carol Evans 2704 17th Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 From: Jennifer ford [redjenford@yahoo com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 6 53 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon falls to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like Increased conservation, water recycling and Infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Jennifer ford 412 14th st huntington bch, CA 92648 9179711941 Esparza, Patty From: Tim Geddes [timternfic@hotmail com] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 5 42 PM To: Marinka Horack, de hamilton@verizon net, hbtalk@bixby org Cc: hb@odo bixby org, debmcduck@aol com, CITY COUNCIL, Mark Bixby Subject- RE [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners There are more red flags with Poseidon than at a Stanford/Alabama football game'. Tim From: horackm@hotmail.com To. de.hamilton@verizon net; hbtalk@bixby org Date, Fri, 3 Sep 2010 22.46.56 +0000 CC: HB@odo.bixby.org; debmcduck@aol.com; city.council@surfcity-hb.org, mark@bixby.org Subject- Re- [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners Poseidon has proved in their attempts to get the Carlsbad Posidon plant started, that they DO NOT have the financing to pay for the up to $550+ million project. Poseidon has not been able to sell the Ounk) bonds for their project, and thus they lost the $350 million subsidy they begged for from MWD. They came with the promise that their was no public risk - that it was all private enterprise But that's a broken promise It's the taxpayers and the ratepayers that will ultimately have to pay for this extravagantly expensive project, as are the taxpayers in Tampa Bay The HB City Council seems to be ignoring all these red flags, and is still working to push the Poseidon SEIR vote through BEFORE the election. Why don't they wait to see how Carlsbad Poseidon goes? Why is the city council so beholden to Poseidon? One little known negative impact of this plant(hidden away in the hundreds of pages of the report) is NOISE - 24/7/365 - blasting out to hundreds of neighboring homes. The noise this plant would produce approaches the decibel level of a jet plane taking off. It's the kind of noise level that would cause police to quickly close down any loud party, but Poseidon neighbors would not have the option to call the police. They would have to live with it And so would the sick wildlfe at the Wildlife Care Center Forget about birds even thinking of nesting at our newly restored wetlands' If the council members have any shred of decency and consideration for the citizens of Huntington Beach, they will reject Poseidon's throughly inadequate SEIR, and throw the carpetbagging snake oil salesmen out of town. Marinka Horack > From. de.hamilton@verizon.net > To- greggdelong@verizon net; cmcgough@surfcity net; hbtalk@bixby.org > Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:40:53 -0700 > CC: mark@bixby org > Subject, Re, [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Those of us who closely follow the goings-on with the Poseidon desalination > project(R4RD, Surfrider, OCDC, 0 C. Coastkeeper, Food &Water Watch, > Environment Now, etc, etc.) have a good idea of the shenanigans this City > Council is up to The current HBCC is setting an ever higher level of > opacity in its dealings with developers Poseidon needs 5 more acres > adjacent to the AES site on which to build its desal plant The school > property fits the bill The HBCC had the land parcel designated as > "surplus" so it could be dealt away to yet another soon-to-be-bankrupt I > private enterprise. The HBCC will probably work some kind of future land > swap with Poseidon wherein Poseidon will, first, get the land and, after it > becomes bankrupt, the City (e.g the public) will get nada This will be > taking place in "closed session" and hidden from public view. > In an era where the public is demanding more transparency from its local > government, our City government is going in an entirely different direction > toward being overtly opaque. On August 2, the HBCC approved a change to > Ordinance 3 44 which previously covered pipeline franchises for transporting > hydrocarbons---oil, gas, natural gas, etc The ordinance was changed to > include "and other substance". No where was this "other substance" defined. > R4RD saw right through the ruse---the "other substance" was water. R4RD > immediately put together a Public Records Act request for documentation and > communication records pertaining to this action. The PRA request has yet to > be fulfilled but, to and behold, an agenda item for next Tuesday's Council > meeting is approval of the Poseidon Pipeline Franchise agreement > That PRA request was not the first to go unanswered. In April 2009 R4RD > filed a request for information on any Poseidon franchise agreement The > City denied that request because the agreement was still being "negotiated", > however, that PRA request remained open > Haven't we, the public, had enough of being cast as chumps? Haven't we, the > public, had quite enough of this City Administration's trickery and deceit? > I know I have. We deserve better > Regards, > -Dave Hamilton > ----- Original Message ----- > From- <greggdelong@verizon.net> > To: "Cathy McGough" <cmcgough@surfcity.net>, <hbtalk@bixby.org> > Cc: "Mark Bixby" <mark@bixby.org> > Sent. Thursday, September 02, 2010 9.06 PM > Subject, Re. [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Cathy, > My understanding of the code is that this allows the city council to discuss > the possible purchase behind closed doors without benefits of transparency > to the residents > The city is in a financial crisis and to think they would spend funds they > don't have to buy something to keep as open space would be a naive thought. > What the city chooses to do with the property after purchase would be > whatever our leaders felt to be in their best interest Their track record > proves they don't support open space. > Gregg DeLong > ------Original Message------ > From: Cathy McGough > To: Evette > Cc: Mark Bixby > Subject: RE. [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Sent: Sep 2, 2010 8 50 PM > Dear Mr Delong, > The school district (HBCSD) owns the LeBard School site and is trying to > sell the site (or a portion) to the City for park expansion, Little League, 2 > private enterprise. The HBCC will probably work some kind of future land > swap with Poseidon wherein Poseidon will, first, get the land and, after it > becomes bankrupt, the City (e g. the public) will get nada.This will be > taking place in "closed session" and hidden from public view. > In an era where the public is demanding more transparency from its local > government, our City government is going in an entirely different direction > toward being overtly opaque On August 2, the HBCC approved a change to > Ordinance 3.44 which previously covered pipeline franchises for transporting > hydrocarbons---oil,gas, natural gas, etc. The ordinance was changed to > include"and other substance". No where was this "other substance" defined. > R4RD saw right through the ruse---the "other substance"was water. R4RD > immediately put together a Public Records Act request for documentation and > communication records pertaining to this action.The PRA request has yet to > be fulfilled but, to and behold, an agenda item for next Tuesday's Council > meeting is approval of the Poseidon Pipeline Franchise agreement. >That PRA request was not the first to go unanswered. In April 2009 R4RD > filed a request for information on any Poseidon franchise agreement. The > City denied that request because the agreement was still being "negotiated", > however, that PRA request remained open. > Haven't we, the public, had enough of being cast as chumps? Haven't we, the > public, had quite enough of this City Administration's trickery and deceit? > I know I have. We deserve better > Regards, > -Dave Hamilton > ----- Original Message ----- > From. <greggdelong@verizon net> > To- "Cathy McGough" <cmcgoug h@surfcity.net>; <hbtalk@bixby.org> > Cc- "Mark Bixby" <mark@bixby.org> > Sent- Thursday, September 02, 2010 9.06 PM > Subject Re: [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Cathy, > My understanding of the code is that this allows the city council to discuss > the possible purchase behind closed doors without benefits of transparency > to the residents > The city is in a financial crisis and to think they would spend funds they > don't have to buy something to keep as open space would be a naive thought. > What the city chooses to do with the property after purchase would be > whatever our leaders felt to be in their best interest Their track record > proves they don't support open space > Gregg DeLong > ------Original Message------ > From: Cathy McGough >To- Evette > Cc: Mark Bixby > Subject RE- [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Sent Sep 2, 2010 8 50 PM > Dear Mr. Delong, > The school district (HBCSD) owns the LeBard School site and is trying to > sell the site(or a portion)to the City for park expansion, Little League, 2 > etc. The Board has no interest in putting anything there that is more dense > than the surrounding homes, nor does the City. We all prefer park space. I > am not sure what the Gov Code is that is cited, but likely it is the Naylor > Act which requires schools to offer the site to cities at a reduced cost a > good deal for the City Negotiations for sale of property are required to > be in Closed Session > Cathy > -----Original Message----- • From. hbtalk-bounces@bixby org [mailto:hbtalk-bounces@bixby.org]On > Behalf Of greggdelong@verizon.net > Sent. Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:11 PM > To. Mark Bixby, hbtalk > Subject- Re- [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > If this is city (resident) owned property, why isn't there more > transparency?Why does the city always chose to hide behind the ruse of > "Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 8"? > If proceedings such as these are above board and in the best interest of the > (residents) city, why meet behind closed doors? > Gregg DeLong > -----Original Message----- • From- Mark Bixby <mark@bixby.org> > Sender. hbtalk-bounces@bixby.org > Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16.56.39 > To hbtalk<hbtalk@bixby.org> > Subject. [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby org > http•//www bixby org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby.org > http.//www.bixby org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby.org > http•//www bixby.org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby org > http•//www bixby org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk hbtalk mailing list hbtalk@bixby.org http•//www bixby org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk 3 Surfnider Fou tion., MESIM TO City Council—Huntington Beach FROM Surfrider Foundation DATE September 7, 2010 RE: Entitlement Plan Amendment (EPA)/Coastal Development Plan(CDP) Amendment& Tentative Parcel Map/Parcel Division Via Hand Delivery and Testimony at City Council Hearin on n September 7, 2010 Dear Mayor and City Council Members My name is Joe Geever and I am the California Policy Coordinator for Surfrider Foundation I am here representing our Huntington Beach/Seal Beach chapter and all our California chapters and members because the action you are contemplating may set an adverse legal precedent statewide Entitlement Plan Amendment In brief, you cannot amend the Coastal Development Permit(CDP) in the manner you are considering for two reasons We request you table this agenda item until the following issues can be resolved First, you do not have the authority to amend the current CDP The CDP the former City Council approved is on appeal to the California Coastal Commission who now has jurisdiction over the project proposal The Coastal Commission already found "substantial issues"triggering a hearing on the appeal—which neither the City nor the applicant opposed We are one of several appellants who have been waiting for the prosecution of that appeal, but neither the City nor the Applicant has taken any steps to pursue that hearing Nonetheless,the issues raised in the appeal must be resolved before the City can amend a permit that, at this point, is no longer in your jurisdiction The City can revoke the current CDP and schedule a hearing to issue a new CDP that contains the significant changes to the project This approach would effectively render appeal of the current CDP moot and re-establish your authority to issue a new CDP containing the significant project changes Tentative Parcel Map 10-130 In regards to the parcel division, we believe this requires an amendment of the Local Coastal Program and issuance of a new Coastal Development Permit(CDP) However, without resolution of the outstanding appeal of the prior CDP, the City lacks jurisdiction to take these actions As with the issuance of the amended CDP by adopting the proposed EPA, adopting a LCP amendment and CDP is premature and outside the City's authority until the appeals of the existing CDP are resolved by the Coastal Commission Once again the City is attempting to effectively resolve a question that is considered a"substantial issue" in the pending appeals That is, the Coastal Commission has yet to resolve the issue of whether the City can deem an"industrial use"within a project site specified for "Public- Semipublic"uses Therefore, the Coastal Commission must resolve the outstanding appeals before the City can take any action on the Tentative Parcel Map and the associated parcel division to accommodate the industrial use CONCLUSION We strongly oppose any action by the City Council on the Entitlement Plan Amendment until the City has re-established jurisdiction over the matter We also oppose issuance of a Coastal Development Permit or amendment of the Local Coastal Program to allow the Tentative Parcel Map proposal at this time We believe that postponing the issues before you tonight regarding this project proposal will avoid unnecessga appeals and litigation that would only serve to delay the final decision However, should you decide to take action to amend the CDP tonight, we want to highlight that the Staff Report on the CDP amendment was only made available to us over the holiday weekend with limited time to prepare detailed responses So we reserve all the issues consolidated in the outstanding appeals as well as reserve our right to amend the appeal as necessary and/or seek judicial review of your jurisdiction in this matter We also want to offer comments on the matters before you tonight, including but not limited to the following brief comments - in regards to the requirement to minimize marine life mortality from entrainment, the Staff Report inexplicably applies CEQA standards to your LCP mandates— and concludes that there are no significant impacts from a stand alone facility Ironically, the FSEIR contradicts that rationale by stating that different standards would apply when agencies enforce their own codes and regulations Also, in the outstanding appeals before the Coastal Commission,this determination of the difference between relying on CEQA findings of"significant impacts"to trigger mitigation versus the expressed mandate for mitigation measures to minimize any damage to marine life was deemed a"substantial issue"by the Coastal Commission The City cannot adopt an amended CDP that effectively answers a substantial issue yet to be resolved by the Coastal Commission appeal Then the Staff Report cites the Coastal Act', without highlighting the explicit language on minimization of entrainment, and seems to imply that you can defer Policy C6 119(p IV-C-128) Prior to approval of any new or expanded seawater pumping facilities, require the provision of maximum feasible mitigation measures to minimize damage to marine organisms due to entrainment in accordance with state and federal law enforcement of your own LCP to the Coastal Commission You can't, This City Council has to interpret and enforce its own LCP Finally, the City Council should be aware that the CDP for the Poseidon-Carlsbad proposal required substantial mitigation for entrainment impacts and distinguished the CEQA findings from the mandates under the Coastal Act - In regards to your LCP policies on ESHA and wetlands setbacks, the project does not provide additional protection of wildlife in adjacent wetlands from the noise attributable to the construction and operation of the facility In fact, the Staff Report cites an exception to the standard setbacks to ensure greater protection for these resources z However,the EPA makes no effort to afford the extra protection afforded these habitats and wildlife - Finally, the EPA and Staff Report do not include analyses of other relevant policies in your LCP that must be considered in adopting a CDP for the proposed project For example, there is no mention of Application of CEQA significance thresholds results in a determination that the seawater desalination facility would not cause significant adverse impacts to marine life due to entrainment when it operates in either the co-located operating condition, or in the stand-alone operating condition Sections 30230 and 30231 of the California Coastal Act(Coastal Act)require generally that marine resources be maintained, enhanced, and where feasible, restored They also require that the marine environment be used in a manner that sustains biological productivity and maintains healthy populations of all marine species It is not anticipated that the project would conflict with these policies However, it is also noted that issuance of a CDP by the CCC will evaluate the project's consistency with these provisions of the Coastal Act, and that the CCC evaluation will include all necessary provisions, conditions or other requirements to ensure that consistency is achieved See: Staff Report,EPA 10-001,Attachment 1.8(i) 2 Policy C71 3(p IV-C-129) Development in areas adjacent to environmentally sensitive habitat areas and parks and recreation areas shall be sited and designed to prevent impacts which would significantly degrade those areas, and shall be compatible with the continuance of those habitat and recreation areas The project is consistent with this policy because it includes significant setbacks from these areas and is further buffered by existing berms and proposed landscaping Pipelines are proposed to be routed in existing street right-of-way and easements or other already developed areas Policy C7 14(p IV-C-130) Require that new development contiguous to wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitat areas include buffer zones Buffer zones shall be a minimum of one hundred feet setback from the landward edge of the wetland, with the exception of the following A lesser buffer may be permitted of existing development or site configuration precludes a 100-foot buffer, or conversely a greater buffer zone may by e required of substantial development or significantly increased human impacts are anticipated In either case, the following factors shall be considered when determining whether a lesser or wider buffer zone is warranted Reduced buffer zone areas shall be reviewed by the Department of Fish and Game prior to implementation (a)Biological significance of adjacent lands The buffer should be sufficiently wide to protect the functional relationship between wetland and adjacent upland (b)Sensitivity of species to disturbance The buffer should be sufficiently wide to ensure that the most sensitive species will not be disturbed significantly by permitted development, based on habitat requirements of both resident and migratory species and the short and long term adaptability of various species to human disturbance (c)Susceptibility of parcel to erosion The buffer should be sufficiently wide to allow for interception of any additional material eroded as a result of the proposed development based on soil and vegetative characteristics, slope and runoff characteristics, and impervious surface coverage (d) Use of existing cultural features to located buffer zones The buffer zone should be contiguous with the environmentally sensitive habitat area and make use of existing features such as roads, dikes, irrigation canals, and flood control channels where feasible The project is consistent with this policy because it adheres to all of the minimum setback requirements included in Policy C71 4 See: Staff Report,EPA 10-001,Attachment 1.8(k)&(1) [emphasis added]. o the enormous energy demand and whether or not that demand is consistent with other policies in the LCP as mandated by LCP Section C 12 3 For example, is the energy demand for this project consistent with the policy to promote energy conservation(LCP Policy C 8 3 1)9 o is the facility actually "coastal dependent" (LCP Section C 1 1 2) and consequently eligible for special considerations under LCP Section C 8 2 4 to "Accommodate coastal dependent facilities (consistent)with Sections 30260 through 30264 of the Coastal Act"9 o Finally, there is no explicit analysis of whether the proposed project is consistent with LCP Section C 1 1, which states the City must"Ensure that adverse impacts associated with coastal zone development are mitigated to the greatest extent feasible"This catch-all provision applies to numerous impacts potentially caused by the proposed project that may or may not reach the threshold of"significance" as determined in the accompanying FSEIR Thank you for your careful consideration of these comments We look forward to your thorough deliberations during the hearing Sincerely, Joe Geever California Policy Coordinator Surfrider Foundation NATIONAL OFFICE—PO BOX 6010—SAN CLEMENTE,CA 92674-6010 (949)492-8170—FAX(949)492-8142—www surfrider org-E-MAIL mfo0j,surfrider org SANDRA GENTS,PLANNING RESOURCES 1586 MYRTLEWOOD COSTA MESA,CA. 92626 PHONE/FAX(714)754-0814 September 7, 2010 Honorable Mayor Cathy Green and Members of the City Council Huntington Beach City Hall 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 Subject Public Hearing/Administrative Items - 4-1 through 4-5, Poseidon Dear City Council, I urge the City Council not to approve Entitlement Plan Amendment(EPA)No 10-001 and Tentative Parcel Map (TPM)No 10-130 nor amend Conditional Use Permit(CUP)No 02-04 and Coastal Development Permit (CDP)No 02-05 by revising the approved location, site layout, floor plans, and building elevations for the Poseidon Seawater Desalination Project nor approve associated environmental documentation at this time Coastal Development Permit The process for the proposed coastal development permit is flawed The approval of CDP No 02-05 was appealed to the Coastal Commission The CDP was never approved by the Commission and the CDP is thus has no standing as an existing permit That which does not exist in the first place cannot be amended Thus, a new CDP must be processed, including public notice for the approval of a new permit FSEIR Some new, useful information has been provided in the Final SEIR such as additional information regarding noise and air quality impacts However, generally speaking, the Response to Comments does little to remedy deficiencies in the Draft EIR Many, if not most, of the responses are non-responsive, only partially responsive and/or dismissive Rather than endlessly re-iterate previously submitted comments,just a few of the major failings are discussed below Failure to re-iterate previously submitted comments on the DEIR regarding significant impacts and unsupported conclusions herein should not be interpreted as acquiescence that those deficiencies no longer exist The FSEIR confirms the piecemeal approach to analysis taken in the DSEIR For example, when information regarding staging areas is requested,the FSEIR indicates this will be identified later (OCCK2-33) When information regarding biological resources along the pipeline route is requested,the FSEIR indicates that this will be researched later(OCCK 2-13) The purpose of the EIR is to inform decision makers and the general public of ALL impacts of a proposed Page 1 of 5 project, not to provide an initial cut with additional information regarding additional impacts dribbled out later a bit at a time The FSEIR refuses to acknowledge and correct factual errors, including its description of the pipeline route as it relates to Fairview Park in Costa Mesa In that regard maps of the park are attached FSEIR misstates what is included in the DSEIR An example includes statements regarding energy use for desalination as compared to imported water (CCC-25) As another example, the FSEIR states that the DSEIR evaluates impacts on land uses that are not even identified in the DSEIR(OCCK 2-114), let alone analyzed The FSEIR also misstates or misinterprets questions For example several commenters asked about the effects of the desalinated water on plant species, even providing specific examples of sensitivity to certain elements The DSEIR merely reiterates that the water would be safe to drink, even though agricultural standards for some materials, such as boron, are stricter than for human consumption The FSEIR repeatedly states that questions do not raise an environmental issue and are thus not relevant However, questions regarding the project's physical and operational characteristics bear on project impacts and must be addressed For example, the DSEIR repeatedly states that it will produce an average 50 MGD, implying that there is some variability above and below that amount A question regarding maximum flow is dismissed as not an environmental issue, although it could result in variability in outfall salinity, energy demand and other factors Perhaps most annoying are conclusory responses that pretty much state that "we did it that way because we chose to do it that way" This was in response to questions regarding coastal policy (CCC-39) and project alternatives (CCC-59) Perhaps the greatest problem remains with conclusions regarding impacts on marine resources Numerous commenters, including public agencies pointed out that agencies such as the California Water Resources Control Board and Energy Commission have found that intakes for once through cooling, and the AES intake in particular, create an adverse impact on marine life The "responses" to such comments fail to address the fact that those findings are supported by evidence in the record for those agencies, and by law must be supported by evidence in the record (Attached is a report on impingement and entrainment prepared for the California Water Resources Control Board ) The response to comments takes refuge in the sophistry that those agencies were exercising jurisdiction over power plants, not desalination facilities, so their conclusions lack validity in this case Will the hundreds of millions of fish larvae and other organisms be any less dead from entrainment in the desalination plant versus entrainment in a power plant" Will the tens of thousands of fish that fall victim to impingement somehow have their survival enhanced if they are impinged by a desalination intake versus a power plant intake? Clearly a dead fish is a dead fish, regardless of how it died Page 2 of 5 Similarly, when it is pointed out by a number of commenters, including State agencies,that the EPA standard for assessing salinity impacts is an increase in salinity of 4 ppt, the FSEIR simply questions EPA jurisdiction and standards, falling back on the SEIR's chosen 40 ppt exceedance standard Tice City cannot logically make the proposed findings based on the record thus far The materials on the public record for this project fail to support findings of no significant impact for the numerous areas where it is claimed no impact would occur or where full mitigation is claimed The examples cited above are but a small portion of the numerous flaws in the documentation for the proposed project It is important that all environmental issues for this critical project be fully investigated and mitigated to the fullest extent possible, including approval of an alternate, reduced project Thank you for this opportunity to comment Yours truly, _ y Sandra L Gems Page 3 of 5 NOW CUMUMM Y 1 7 un of co-jA m,,x FAIRVIEW PARK %i,TEP, pu\ Page 4 of 5 1, LL— Wd > it v F2i,-,-.Park L Table qitr r-0.YI.-P—s r l FVZ—nFj—Mapi INA 5 A C�t.,4,. CITY OF COSTA MESA Kaftmaier Ne weft Kehr FAIRVIEW PARK MASTER PLAN ADJACENT USES MAP Pair Z-4 Nkm�a Fainlk- k Nt4swr 11*0 Page 5 of 5 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuanne Waters for Power Plant Cooling Appendix E — Entrainment and Impingement Estimates (Steinbeck, July 2008) Compilation of California Coastal Power Pleat Entrainment and Impingement Estimates for California State Water Resources Control Board Staff Draft Issue Paper on Once- through h ire July 18, 2008 Prepered r Prepared by- Michael Foster John Steinbeck 356 M Ln- 911 Bkhom Rd_ Pis=Beach,CA 93449 Introduction The purpose of this repartis to comqnle the ino6t compl eta and most recent information on the Inological efficts of entrainnimt and inipingement by coastal power plants in Califbinia that we once-thrcugh coo (OTO The uffarmatum will bee used by the CaUbrida State Water ControlResources Board(S ) hig policy for regulating ffie use ofOTC by power plants m the state_ 'Ib--sources for muh of the information presented ffithis report 31 (b)sfinlies that have been conq&lted at many of thin coastal power plants in California in the past fee to ten years- To put the Tesafts into cwteml A was necessary to compile accurate mforination an the acbmi vohnne of cooling water used by the plants 'Ile design fkms for the system("ie s puniping cam}were coupled fern infimnation already provided in the March daft of the S%'I were checked against uifinniation published m the recce 316(b)sftmfim and 31 a)Proposals for ItEfaination,Collechun(I'IC)-Some of the reported design fim values fliat ddfered between sources were also chedced with plant staffi It is unportant to point out that the design flows may not reflect the mmumm possible e volinnes for some of the plamts,since the values typically include,the vohnnes for the main circulating watex puzups,and mol:the mailer affmce water pumps m- the systems-The total volumes for thew smaller pumps are generally less than S percent of capacities-Actual cochng watuflows reported to the RWQCBs the NPDES perunts for the plants were used to calculate average daily flows fcw the -year penod from 2 5 The sources used in compAuig the flow inflarmation are pro ffi Appendix A� The methods used fcr compiling the mtraininem and mipmgment estanatespresented-in Fables I and$and are described in the fill Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-1 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Ryaw Plant CWS Estmites Entrainment Estimates Tk entrainment data premated in Table 1 were mostly compiled fh=recent 316(b)stmIres of cooling water systems at power plants in Cahformia Entrainment estimates are only presented for larval fishes because this is the only ta�onanuc group and life stage that was sampled consistently across all of the facilities.En of the larval stages of some commercially macro nvertebrates was assessed at some of the plants,but Im ted to later stage of crabs and lobster,and recently-hatch immature squid.der larval stages of ffiese and odw macroinverfebrates are not effectively collected by the mesh of the nets used M' the samphug and would have requm5d adhtional sampling efforts. vmtebrates have muffiple larval stages that have varyrng periods of development further complicating the planning of an appropriate sampling program and further complicating the assessment The entramment assessment mod used for mast of the shxhes was the Empirical Transport which can be used in assessmg the potential en raimment impacts on rather macrounTrtebrates assumptions regarding the won of the larvae in the sae water and the eident and vuhnne of the source water far the populations relative to the cooling water vol®ae on fish larvae in these studies is appropriate since larval fishes are nub more landed in im the water column and the adults far many species are lined mi doAnibuftm mcreasmg the potential for popnrlatian-level effects. The table presents two sets of enhumment es#®ates.The first set is simply cakulated using mmul average larval co lions inilhphed by annual design and average actual 2000-2005 fleraars_The other set of entranmemt estmnates is from the published stud,which takes udo account month-by-mouth nionth-by-mouth differences in larval ca=entrations and therefbm provide more accurate tes of actual entramment for the periods of staidy(Appendix B) Some of these shuhes chid not include estimates for both design and ach al flows(shown as`nc' ffi Table 1)_ The only plants where recent representative entramment data were not available were the Contra Costa and Pittsburg power plants located im the Sacramento-San]cam Delta ) The table does present annml exft:ammed estinates,for those two plants frum studin completed thirty years agar in 19(7 -1979.No estimates were calculated from the larval concentrations nie2sured during those shxhes because there have been so many long-term changes m flows and on wrthm the Delta"EM that the hilt Decal mtknates are mlikely to be representative of current conditions- The entrainment esfimates calculated Using the atixzage mmial larval concentrationsare very similar to the publish t estimates for the two nuclear plants(SONGS and and units at other plants that operate at lugh►capacity factors_There are greater dif[erences between the two sets of estates far plants and units that operate at low capacity factors_Tluz is due to kmsonal changes in larval concentrations that can significantly affect estimates of annual entramment especially when peak pumping capacity is ommmig&mng penods with high concentradons aflarvae-The seasonality in larval abundances varies between central and southern Cat; a and also between open coast and protected bays and harbors(Figures 1 and Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-2 �11 !ji, It'. -;'134 :'f rl fill Y.,lE �:il!t 4! .+%.ills l;.• !ii' l:��t�' f1,.4.: L ? 41�11,liti?y�l 1 4:IIIY .�kti •- '• ."Itsx4;;':` 4' t-4 1'll aliti '!II'. /t,T.:i'illll 1111 lFl f`r::�If tt�lr,i Ir all R4!1.i:41t. ��Il:1�:- 4E..h'y 14 I'..I" Yii '':i!I l.w :a1I!€Y :I Ifli:J^,::11 M ,'.Eis' 3:' :: I t:;r•:.�..�. • :-.YaF f�� Yk:iS.!':111�+ ,M::i 1'I t:.Y i.:;It:Il11 -r..i:�: F t�.f.. .i :;tir: a_ r:ti-:ei •!' �K 1I." Y,. EI*' I '�d3'.:3' +�1!I � ill! i."�i'i It 'IF'r-.. :I Ji" �1 a Mr.-FM I a 4-4-.':r- ,1t ! 4 mtl:llk 1 Jill;it. F 4411 I1 i 711 ;.xT 11 rt tF.,1;i , r.17.1,F7IJi 7f1. .:gait; 4#!: 41IiI , €Y 7 _ ll f13 11 Ts li I,:1! " t.'. t{ 1. 'iF,: -1 t4;t' i,.:%1 h-t.:. i 4 r�1�Y:k;t r 1 y' 4 :11 ''I• Y:`;i'i�1 r,I.F' 1l fl f I:I;fi7.` 4.t:4.=E :I l r „`iF i F.I 7'Is:�" 4 1�i,!!?4 [y`,I F1J:- 1�I.' 'x.l'FL:r4 I CI:�` is!!1 •?AlYIIF..+.J i� 7 +.'ari,r.11 `FJ:i:�ll Y+1 'I'':rf .IY. rl a9='- .1, tl. _If tf�. tl.,., ,,ri'f i`•x Il!1'i-Y, >i'I:•:'4 4I s• •�- All i It:1.1 4'4 I Kq,i .51:. 4;•,4L9 ,:,111.iil 1:" It' 1€�' 41:.::.. rlllk: ,'4 "'k 4 �ilIL :11 tlF 1:'�Iil r:':1:1'ft.'. '1.' 1.1'..<. YII'r i'i'. .i.l. .'ti":• t.;ttt,s* :}III l.!':: . ',.•.� :.... 'S''.: 4M�:f�►,:`i}E :I.F.:4 A-: IJ'ti it F€1 !i'.:Y', + :III...I!'i: i....:i'.JI ;It.:t ':ei :� "• ;.bl� �.�^.�' �"M. 1.1 !;':' 4"Iltrr" :Z. 4 �;G lII:.Ill�lt rr'II �Y 11!Id C; ! !I 4 ii. Ii;i;' t'e'4 D" ! rt iPl t! r, { !. I, '.ti•= Illlih :i.okw !1; If 4aci 1A #'. t1,4}II'ilt :tE If:. '�`i,}:,.; LII ; }1sf.4�.ti1 .,IiF Ie4.;. -y ice• tl�.�l :1IY 4.: 4 .41- 1±;4'i i" - - t••:!'•::-: it t it,Y' 1i,i:"et•'•" yZ iL€tl".+I ;-i ',(+1! l.a S:II 4 .n"!i"lF .1da• 7:: E ?: i:.-i': 'i1R f ":y; r: i-."k:. .IF A11 r'Ii Fl k: M 4..-:I:.F�.4; IF L3r" :-.4. :i',t:71 ti' ,':t1 M•T III ^•:.'.:l :ii 4•�Ur-..il It,3f!i—I I 14'r 1 A:,II• :11 Ill t..ln�. .',i'i Li,S:.::= ' 1 a.. lltlk i III,077A .-.'llf•.ffsi ;;- Lr: t r;i[r4 '.1; 411I /1T•," .5 44r74';t}ti':It R f� JAM-77,u3 J 71kMa PT;.l'.w7oll i.171r vA(oil.Jir` .:iti it IIIiiFll3,u " =IN: +,Y�}�'L. 4111!!Ili 4s4Jlk.'4dt JiiIIBI 11 c' t!•�IFE rlt Mi�;p 11' ttl''Ih; 5•+: ,-:t1t4',! �-. !il '4 -dz.' til;4i1 `IIE :-:97 it 1-:l6r >R. ls:�'.frl �4 t•:i'ti I:t." ,Illii a :4 _1i 441t,t•'.:'1'11 :IC 1,'t�t .I - 'it li+� gill 11 Lk: ,�f { i t,� 4'�'i IlIF: 1'i-.t i!i-�� :i".' 'I -i}:�J �►':iF-x:W.1 LrWts ism �1 tll',�'• Y k: h .-:'':ItI Y.,, - .1i 1;.,.?1:9: 'If::4� Illil- Yt,.I Fh'Y^"r .I" •t' .4 61 tIt"i trt i. ,r:41 ih7" kill r 1F.F sy�h l it f.�s A�":.: lil', 1..9 44-i�4�`1111 :11 4�1i•s tl„I :✓.'�!! 4 Ilk Y Ir:I k111 l.f;r "1111_;yv�n 6 iltllf f',1.,;1 4lili:�'�d€! 1i-11:47I ' •I ':..'.I + 'I !' '•I t 1a: ',-L II F ;,F.',.I :+Y I IG i >I Y:;rrA:. ',I'IiF�: /�+' T I 4::111'..1 .I I tl : Y^I fit=11.3111 LR4IItlll� :11.4.1 Y Y �F: Y�'Y�.:A 4rt- :3d •� 4t M�:�4l ti..,r Y•:: -9yi 1.�,;1i t�4ii:. a I' IrE€ ,^. 5 !',ii Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuanne Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA r Rath CWS Estimates Impingement Estimates Similar to entrainment the impingemed datapresented in Tables 2a and 2b were mostly obtamed from Decent shxhes(Appendm B)at power plate mt California using the same flow data used ffi Table 1 and do=aented in a diz A-Impingement esbmiates are only presented for fishes because this is the only taxonomic group that was san4vled causistently across all of the ficilites.Data on macro inipungement were collected at all the facihttes,but the data collected varied among plaits.At some facilities all invertebrate groups were cow,and at others only invertebrates that could be characterized as alhollfish(e.g.,crabs,sluimp,s and odopm)were canted.,while the other iiivertebrate,categories were only recorded as 'present'when they were collected-At some facilities only sheRfish viwe collected and wed.Besldes the inconsistencies m the sampling among plants,it is somebmes,difficult to distinguish the invertebrates that are collected after they are dulodged.fiau8 the intake condint walls from organisms that arse'impinged from the source water Even crabs,shrimp,and other inrnvertebrates that could be characterized as`shellfish'thatt are collected dLumg kuppgement sampling probably setded in the bmoRml ng comumity mslok the coohng water intake system as larvae.As a result of these issue,only data on fish is summarizBd in Tables 2a and 2b- The information in Tables 2a and?b presents two sets of mrpingement estimates for both nrimben and biomass of fishes The fast set is cakalated using the armual average iWagement mks chug normal cups calculated from the recent Audies.The total opuiboxis inpingement eshmates;were calculated by lying the inipingment rates by the total anmaal desiga and average 2000-2005 flows These impingement estimates fDr nonial operations wed be added to the average annual-, dun ng heat treatments for the plants where heat treatnumts are used for controlling biof 'cam inside the coaling qStEM The other set of unpingeinent estimates is from published studies,which chd not in all uses present estates for both design and actual flows(shown as`nc'in Table 2b) These estimates include bath nc3®al cations and heat treatment inzpmygemenI As with the ,the only plants where recent five data were not available were the Contra{costa and Pittsburg power plants located in the Delta system.The table does for those two plants from studies completed thirty yem ago mt 197&-I YM. Intake Structure Information an the mft shuc+ues;at the C a i finnia power plants is presemted m Table 3.The va iious fish protection munsmes in use at each plant are listed and details are provided on the diniensions of screening used at the Openings to the ceGUng water systems This i1dDIM2110n could be used inevaluating the potential for enhapment of marine mamimal and sea trades into the system.Note that the only plants wrath variable speed drives that allow flow to be atusted to meet load capacity are"installed at the Contra Costa and Pittsburg power plants ffi the Delta San Onofre is the only plant with a sophisticated fish retmn systemL Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-3 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuanne Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Paener Foam CWS EStmneles References (see Appendix B) Ecological Ana4sts_ 1981 a. Contra Costa Power Plant cooling water intake sftucbze 316(b) de monstratnon_Premed for Pae c Gas&Electric Co.,San Francmm,CA- Ecological Analysts. 198lb-Piftdnzg Power Plant cooking vimtez intake structiue 316(b) demonstration-Prepare,for Pacific Gas do Electric Co., San Francesca,CA- ENSR Corporation- 2008a Draft impingement Mortahly andfor E t aid Cliaractenzation Study'R,ehant Energy Mandalay Generating Station(NPDES Permit No CA00011 SO)_ Prepared for Reliant Fogy_ ENSR Corporatuon_2009b.Draft Inopingemeut Mortality and for Entry m ent Charactesization Study-Reliant Energy Oiinond Beach Generating Station(NPDES Permit No CAOD01199).Prepared for Reliant Eneagy MBC Applied Euvuonmental Smences. 2008.San Gnofre Nuclear Generating Station Chmn Water Act Section 316(b)impingement mortality.and entrainment characterizt um sk.dy_ In EPRL 2008-Camprehmm a Matron Study for Southern Califo®a Edison's San Onofre Nudear{Generating Station-Prepared)for Sotithern Calf kmia EdLwxi,San Clemente,CA- MBC Applied ErnrHonmental Sciences and Tenera Environmental. 2005.AES H Beau Generating Station entamment and unpingement study final report.Prepared)for AES Huntington Beach L_LC. and California Energy Commission,Sawmtento,CA- MBC Applied Environmental Sciences and Tenera Em uonmesntal. 2008a Alamitos Genffating Station.Clean Water Act Section 316(b)mnpmge rent mortality and diaractenzahon study.Prepared for AES Alamitos L.L C_Long Beacl4 CA. MBC Applied Environmental Sciences and Ten m Einaron=uental- 20O8b_Redonda Beach Generating Station Clean Water Act Section 316(b)zu#Wmumt mortalt,and entraimment rha mettnzation study_Prepared for AES Redondo Beach L-LC-,Redondo Beady CA MBC Applied Emaronmental Sciences,Tenera Em roamed,and.URS Carp 2008&Hayes Geuesating Station Clean Water Act Section 316(b)Jinpingememf mortality*and entramment charactesaaation study.Prepared for City of Los Angeles Dept of Wad and Power Los Angeles,CA MF1C Applied Environmental Sciences,Tema Euviromnmbl and UR.S Corp-2Mb Harbor Generating Station.Clean Water Act Section 316(b) "nupingement mortality and entrains characterization study_Prepared for City of Los Angeles Dept-of Water and Power,Los Angelees,CA. Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-4 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuanne Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Pbwer Punt C S F References (see Appendix B) _1931a 31 ) &Bectne Co,San Fnncmw,CA 19 a aftuchmm 31r) forPscific Gas& Co-,San F , _ FS PmWt No-CA00011 - Moftlity awYor ES FMnit No. CA00011 _Frqwed fcsr Reliant Emuff. NBC Applied --- Sciences 2 -Sam Waler Ash ` 316(b)"nTingenient mmtalq and enhamment _ ju EFRI 2W9_ for Scuffieza Cafi&nxia Edisues Sam S San Cknwnle�CA- T _AFC Generating Statan euMmmmst and mVmgmad study find rqmt hqwed ��+vg�far AES _ ,CA- SlatIon Clean Water Act Sectma 31G(b) study ftqmed fig AES Ahmtos 1a1.._C.,Lcmg Bewlk CA- hW and T 2 - Genending Slation Clean Water Act Section 316(b far AFC Re&m&Bea&LILC_,Radondo CA- NBCTen=FmAromauK a d,URS C .Ma.Hayms Genending Stmhm Clean Water Act Section 3If6(b eWmnamed o fir City of Los Anydes DepL of Wad and Power,Los Angeles,CA- NBCANdiedF T 1; and URS Comp Generating Shfim Ckm Water Act Section 316(b)" mind for Cky of Los Angpies fit_of Water Power, , CA- Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-4 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuanne Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Pdwer Plant CWS meats M BCF Applied Envir Scaemr ,Tenera Euv*oznmmf4 and UM Corp 2008c_ Scattergood Gmerating Statum Clean Water Act Secon 31 b)_ gement mortality and enftainment chaiacteryzatm stud.,.Prepared for City of Los Angeks Dept. of Water and Purer,Los Angeles,CA_ Tee 1988.Daabl,o Canyon Power Plant.Cooling Water Intake 31CO Prepared for _Gas&Elects Co,San Francisco, CA. Tenera Environmental- Diablo Caxayon Power Plant 316(b)Denionstrabon report Prepared for Pacific Gas&Elect Co_, San Francisco, CA Team nvironmpptal 2000b.Moss I andin Power Plant moderumhon project 31 b)resource assemnent Prepared for e Energy Moss Landing LLQ Oakland CA Ten.+era En 2001.Macao Bay Poorer Plant modernization project 31 a)r assessumot Prepared for Duke Energy Mmm Bay LLC, Oakland CA Tema Enwr 20M South Bay Power Plant coobng water system effectson San Dino Bay,Volume B_ Compliance vdth Section 31 )of dw Clean Water Act Rw the South Bay Poorer Plant Prepared for Duke Energy,South Bay LLC,Ckh Vista.,CA- Tema Ear 2005- Po ftwo Poww Plant 31 b 'on Rgxnt for Pogo Power Plant Unit 3. Submatteyd to Mural Polrero,LLC, San Francisco,CA. Temeri Eaivir 200 a. Potrero Power Pit bnpmg Mortality Study Data ReporL Submitted to h1irant Potwo LLC, San Francisco, CA_ Teener tat 2007b.Moss Landing Power Plant Units 1&2 and Unft 6&7 emaent Study Data fbr Moss Landing Power PlaK Moss CA Tenera En%won ,t al 20 _ Cabrillo Pomw I LLC,Encina Power Stafton Clem Water Act Sw,tia a 316(b) ' mortality and study_Emits on the bmtogwal resources ofAgua Ekdionda Lagoon and the nearAwre ocean enmramnEnt Prepared for Cabrillo Power I LLG, Carlsbad.,CA Temera Encrir and 1C Applied Environmental Scaemen_ .ElI Segundo Genamfing StatimCleau Fatter Act Sect on 31 )im a i tmortality and entrainment characterization stuslp. for El Segando Power LLC,El Se ,,CA_ Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-5 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuanne Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Povver Ptent C WS F_stanates! Table I Emus. memt a Amutes fir larval f; fiom CahfiHmia coastal power pests_Eshrnates me}ude calculated values fiom dew and azmage;l mnal 20DO-2005 flows using larval comri traiwns from recent studies and a➢so estunates f am recently published entrainment studies. Ref serves used in compih g the mfioamation in the table are prided in Appendix B. Avena& Average Average Avsrags Flaw Larval FM Cmcwtratfon Connewbmtlnn shedtr Result study Reraul t Daelgn {mGdl daee'd {wunntration am1 DMIgn Flow aria Average Flory EntMnm nt EntIROMMA Flow an 20D -2M5 (B per m®lm EnUMment Estratmrnwd EetlmalB p eBAp Eatimats(Achm Plant engio dada larva) EstIFTEN, Eatlmats 1Atair[to6 Genwra&q StAon UnfisvfS2 207 121 9B8U.6 744306.54d 437,854jM 10 121,97g937 A131111M Ge Ma"Slaf M Unit 384 392 281 98 W6 1.414.971.165 1.013.733.478 I.M.972,442 720-444.910 Gee'► ar q Station LAnft 5g6 674 413 99722 Z455,02Q 121 1,500,394,233 no m-835 841.96 Contra Cnsta Power Plant Urft 697 440 257 no ueoent mp wkrdaM data aw2atNe no 95,110.GM 0]laIAo Canyon Pow Man` 2,MB 2.267 T912.5 1,765.91k778 1,,%7.319,02D M 1 481.948,383 El Seginda GenEra?ing Station Urfts 182 207 69 1953.7 147.969,610 49A37a54 rue 35.743.30 ®Segundo Gomaiing--=m UM 3" 39B 265 195&7 284,43%472 T8829%759 276,934,913 1B6 53ZO03 EMM PMW Plant 857 621 1395D.2 4,366,667,796 3,162,645.118 4,494,84%115 3.627.641.744 IHaMorGe gstab= 108 59 39619 156,23kM 85,447f634 153,331,013 65,29Q,0Dll Hapm Galer=q Stabw %8 258 123W.►_3 4,349,235.947 1.159,6was 4,527,644,,034 3.6492,392 Htsrfington._Bead1Gwmrdbn_q 514 179 199M 299L647AM 104,338,D74 344,57 nC Mandalay Genadbllg Slatlon 253 234 15M5 140.lW%151 129.Mi.071 141,736.337 33.422.317 Mffd me 257 3464.0 830,MA168 318,94Z611 859.337.7" no] Moss Lam"Power Plant LAMB 182 361 193 4429-9 584,101,411 311.537.103 =319.740 no [9661�'La&ig Pam PIMlnit6&7 865 337 2958.3 934,65iVAMc 418,3 886.204A nc 47unMd Beach Gen wa0ng Stthw 685 521 16&9 42,2766804 32,133L537 40,810.W 6.351,783 P�z T f%w P6an1 Unt18 585°, 462 Z74 no mood tepmsentat6re data at 61e _ no 175.230,E .. Poem Power Plant 231 193 3593.3 3MS19JM 252,843.159 259.731.811 no Sfatlen� [tdi 5 217 51 � 44956 a3,W7= 356,MQ,- 6 7 10155U7 ReftM Generad>ng man Urdu 788 675 254 3133.5 772.198,644 290,8a1.357 744,808,585 189.537.344 _` � sU ; -1,219 �1,138 � 74 6 y3ti319 3[ .T,68 S.Fs .6s3, nc ` ��,787,272 SM OnVre F[tJC*x Generating 5Ia5m U 1.219 1.154 7439.6 3,311,W7,158 3,136.92.690 no 3 261.783,562 y StmM[6-1 Pala Pland Eel 417 10951.E 2,4 046L574 1.65TAC6„878 2,424,527.Trg nc Iowa 15,245 10.191 1196R2-2 29,,483 307.521 19,355,130.108 Av Bmp 5441L1 no-Rot ca=ded Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-6 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuanne Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Power Foam CWS Fst:.ales TAT L eshomaies for Lmval fish$om Cahfim a caasW pomw pL-tt.Fahmaks mrh&cakubded vats ffafn denga and amage amafal 2000-2005 finis vsmg brral fimmmeent shubes and a➢so mates fsa m aeotw y pubbghed en&mnwez&dedws. Refimmmm used m campiEmg fi*nifizmabon.M the table am pn7m dea m Appmdm 8. AVKW FIM 1.11tsee Mft CMMMI CMWMIMOM z Amen 1MttI on"el=M OMMMhHUM find oagp Fen■ 00 AVI Fine BdrMMMd 6n6uhumd HOW CO200-MM P pWMMM B*MMMUA aftmmmd sambpNI ,pa" P9efat M dd. M EdMMI EIIIIII flog) AMAIN 3MM URNS 394 392 281 9Mfi 1,414.971.%5 1,0+13,733.478 1,1R97Z442 728ti944.910 r n"", Ccsta PawI1nk 687 440 257 lm 1Iel09f!mpmeRUM dab a►Me ne ®Sew GNI 5bkm U1k 182 M? 69 1953.7 147,969.61D 49A37.M nr 35I EnCere PVMFPOd 857 621 1395012 4,366.66T.796 3IIVV W8,118 4.444JM115 3AUA441.744 Sterols 965 25e1 133M3 4,349235"7 1.M 4,.S44AN 3AS.20.392 MKAFMM ra"SbMM 20 M US" 148.19.151 129A1p71 141.736= 33,422.317 M=Lam Potit?f Md Uftps 162 361 193 442" SK1e11.411 311,1 =319.740 me 0f IMM Beads Gmerahsg WAw fiffi M IE" 42,1 32.13d W 448W.M 6,351.70 Pao Pam Pf d 231 193 35%3 X S1'9.077 2&LM.159 2M731.811 ne III: a MMM GeiI Sea w 1Ndt 7W 675 254 3133.5 77'1.1911yw 29Q AM 36T 744,e1aet0e5 169=.344 offMINEROMMEMEMMIM Sae OIsn11e Pew tMa201M St AM U 1.219 1.154 7439Ii A311.311'7.168 3.M923.60 nC 3.26t,783,562 gMdh Bari PotM pW t am 417 10951.6 2AG4Ar56.M 1.6fa7,9INUM 5f27'.779 nG 1•aba 15,245 10.191 112012 25.4et 7.521 1%3M13k118 =-notcacuWed Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-6 IIIf ' - 11 -11VIS �,'k4 J-77, pw 1116 UL Lh 1 IQ to I S 4-j 42 —Q1 r pit ­4 X 7, —1D co Ici PL IS 10 z 0 f CO CY CIO IQ, r � � �f a co Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA firer FUM CWS Estuioates Table 2b. Im)inge ment estmaztes fur fish mumabers and biomass(lb)firom Ca➢nfoma coastal power plants_The unpmgmnemt estimates f&aan recently published u purge emt mortaly stwies mchide,imWingement dming heat ti mahmeIIt.Studies 1dhen impngement eTbm2tes vmm not calculated for design or actual Rawr cauditians dmmg the study are indicated as"nc".Re£erences used imm compiling the nxFmmahon m the table an prmaded m Append=B. 080p AMMW Flour Dodip Flow Ach"FIr Rau MUM bMM as OnIgn Fialil Tate)OWN= A&M F1aor Tait MMUM Plait ME 8?00.2005 dais ITatEd a aftnatB Ei Esftmb TWA 0 EdUnah9 A�rr>:iob staflm 0111 1$2 20 121 AftWM,GMOAr9SWOriUrWM3M = 382 281 rc nc 2US 1= AWrMO&Ger WAhgI Statim UdM 5&5 674 413 Cortra Cost Pow PUt URM 687 440 257 — — 1Q AO Z741 ��ialiluCa n Power Plait 2= Z257 rc no ne uc ®SajmM Gmeramrg 9tabn Urft 182 207 69 rc rrc 185 63 1"SEA I&Ga WMM SWm UM 394 399 255 2.521 542 I= 473 Encre Pow Plait B67 621 28a,5fa2 IzM 215,583 %609 i�alerallty SUM 108 59 I%Ml km 8AI 24Q'I Fl3YileS Gerieallig SWM 96B 25B 56 613 1= 53.442 1,168 8ei GMM�ibj SbhM SM 179 rc rc 51,E iM Genera"Sbftn 253 234 311347 1.3M 8.9T9 199 M P Plait _ 66& 257 rs 11e A139 Z957 Mom Lauding R er P13t1 Lkft 1&2 351 M 75.133 804 57AS4 fAM Imbik La" mttI&6&7-: * E55 M7 135AN Z29T AIM78 OMMM Beads Gerla Nq S I 655 521 7M 844 517 75 !99�WrSP1331x11s585 4B2 274 7 �F rr, 220354 51� pubm PUAU RIM 231 1943 146JM 3 0136 1G727 Z 446 � _ 217 ,51 .1 T1 133--- Re&rAb GelerA"StMon Uri 15 786 675 254 2910 1.315 1.101 368 sh_".'�r 8 a ne 14q.14 746 Offiff Stan 495 309 106.843 11.619 9F,241 9,d22 y Powfi` 7 1 zmw, a417 1 � tt -� BEC Try 1JQ,>>J1 nemmcdram,.. aced Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-8 '.i i�' ,1, Iil 111i:•.,.�r� �1,.1 ,:fin/.I.fl�:lll:.: iY :/"i 1. 1111,1'lii Y.,1' ..i.i' '1 i.i':allll..'Y...: II Ill i,lne I.1 Ci�•ilr:: 4.V,..y,^ F.V 7777 1 7FMT, •'I .. ,il.'.r'Vie"11 :J1?i �i'.'1 1'1.'_.i' �i_':!'ii,: .11 I1a �. r�l,l lr,J I J111 II'1"Y r,,�IIII I�Id'� n i11�IL�1':�" IIY 1111�' '�^si '�il' i:lll'illl," il`I' I I'��.Illill 'J'f„ i 1l Ylll�'� — I li _ `�1 �.'/d'i•'..11:.: �R'J �' 'i1.Y� ✓:�. Y�1 i',J'.i IIY r II:V V � 1111-t III .1'll,.v.. • 1 i',• :-.Ii, ,.,'^I '1 .' I�: �i:.b�;' I is _ :Ii Y,. ,i Ir YJ ',lil + IV�� '1 111'/l.1':1' il/ i '-.1,,11. 'i r':1' !I'�' , i — k i t' �' = r x s T a.�' Sti t a spy. 4 S s- } 5�! ,' ,. S -:r�+ s x5 x' . �P 1? 1 ':. �e ,�;, ..e t t•hC ,,`. .� - 1 i G 9 � x'�4' ��� ,�",�`,'. r ,��-�a � A�,x �p e4 a=` ��rE`t'+� '"r� ��",�,'h�;•x x a.°,2pf��t4 A,v Y� �,�,; y;,� rya g iE8 M ro �Y& i,�. 0 a , �.v�k�#.m....°e„R(,m.:%.°F uu.xttS 1 a .w.. S 'f A P¢y.df ril, ,S .s�"P k.U.N,a Sa.erS':`1�`'uWg,. ..sw� f { f R— +.a.,.,,,, a,.Aw. I r .` ..,`:�.>.,3.r}a.Y Y �^. . �'q +5 as + '3» Y tix a A a1 s e t x,NAq :rc.aec t sxr`d 41aye � t 4�rn'k .,� dr,}^s �'`�l,`;i^ae. r4 alo a��.al± f J.v�.. z:5`',z Ee.m, �'°i,. x... S,w.'� �' �i"':u 7 FJ77- glen 1":. gr'�`v„+H e r 'P =` `sy �' _`h E.�v`r ,, 'SukY y�, a; ,. ,, "'sn•, yyi r t t Yy P, . z,.,;'ra_ F.'1v- �..,3.f;.n„u,el.a ., "°a.,.,a,.. ,.r$e.anz':6.' 2 y ,_. . Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Power Plant CWS Estimates Table 3 Information on cooling water intake system design at California power plants Acronyms used for the various intake components and fish protection systems and provided below the table Vertical Intake Screening or Fish Protection Size of openings at Entrance to Distance from Mammal Exclusion Region Plant Location Type of Intake Devices* Intake Riser to VC Bars Offshore? loGl �ont�aosta"Ikiwer Plahtt' xtidaln+er v sFrorelme_ B -u SVFD� Bar racks 3 0aitig;,; - 'rUa tam. NoCal Pittsburg Power Plant _ tidal river shoreline BR-TS-VFD Bar racks 3 5"spacing n/a n/a N�oC i '�itCero PowerwPiant �baharlior shoreleBF# T, �` Bar�xfais 3i pacing - ntat1a NoCal Moss Landing Power Plant Units 1&2 bay/harbor shoreline BR-TS Bar racks 3 5"spacing n/a nla t ` _ " � na- /a" �La ,P'w ln & arackCstng oC an6 a6 s NoCal Morro Bay Power Plant bay/harbor shoreline BR-TS bar racks 4"on center n/a nla NoC` _ Datilos�artygh P roePPiant `', °ce�n" stirrlin "BRT5 fib;aciis3r° f'center e �n1 � Irt Socal Mandalay Generating Station bay/harbor_ canal _BR-SS 4 bar racks 2 5"spacing _ n/a _ _n/a (SnCai Cfrmond=tech Ge"nesting§tation ," ocn oore` A° VCaPR•TS 4 at}Cathibarsevery 1 ° a ^4 " 18'"spacing Socal Scattergood Generating Station ocean offshore VCap-BR-TS 5'at VCap with bars every 9" 5' 9"spacing n al ; I,Se nd ;ene bng'StabnUnitst_`&2 °_ �o`ce' ffshore�_ ��PT A' x `r2'at,VCa ., ' '� N2' Socal El Segundo Generating Station Units 394 ocean offshore VCap-BR-TS 3 at VCap _ 3'_ di�ilo;G�neragrig Stator Umts S&6 bay arbor offshore Cap; TS _ 4$at VCapt h tiaifs ever l8ar 4„_ 18".sp cAy Socal Redondo Generating Station Units 7&8 bay/harbor offshore VCap-BR-TS 4'at VCap with bars every 18" 4 18 spacing SoCal Haynes Generating Station _ tidal river_ canal BR-TS/SS bar racks 6"on center n/a nla_ So(�# Alaniltis 6eeratink Sta and Uni 1& aylhibo ' sh �hn� BR TS '� f;, bar rac?t 3 spacing x �nlat nla, Socal Alamitos Generating Station Units 3&4 baytharbor shoreline TS no bar racks n/a nla SoCal aindBsxGenertl6rigt tioiirtinits 5&6� bay�a►l shtarehn Art/ SoCal Huntington Beach Generating Station ocean offshore VCap-BR-TS _ 5'at VCap with bars every 18 51 18 spacing SoL�a( n Qna�herNyteara eery tabon€Un? ,on o or s VVaes Fish EtevatiirBR 1 S T a �lC ,gar771 - "� Socal San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 3 ocean offshore VCap-Vanes-Fish Elevator-BR-TS 7'at VCap 7' No tb �< te' = r� 5 ay or_ sti nl SoCal South Bay Power Plant bay/harbor shoreline BR-TS bar racks 3"spacing n/a n/a VCap=velocity cap,BR=bar racks,TS=traveling screens,SS=Slide screens,Vanes=structures inside intake to divert fishes,VFD=variable frequency drive pumps Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-9 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Power RmA CVYS Esfi nates Larval Dish Concentrations by Month at Southern California Power Plant OTC Intake 7.0 6.0 0 Bay-Harbor ® Open Coast y 5.0 c V c 4.0 c 0 3.0 c 2.0 LL 1.0 0.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Figwm 1 Total cancentrafian of larval des by mom►at OTC mba)kes m souiben Cahfcama-Data sources biased an most recent 316(b)sampling candneted at each paw facildy Planets combmed fbx bay4mrbcus mmoerbabons were Soudb Bay, Emma,Hayne.%Alamdos,and Harbor,and the plants camabiwd for the open coast cmcankatww mwe San OaDfre,H Beacb,Redamulo Bea*E1 Segmio,and Scattergoo . Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-10 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuanne Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Power Pit CWS Eshmales Larval Rsh Concenbutiom by Month at Plant OTC Wake 7, I� 6.0 a open cow s.4 4.0 3.4 2.A L 01 Jan r Apr May Jun Jul Aug 'Sep Oct Now Dec Fag L'Tot1 of at aIC Data mmmes based an =YA mend 16(b)samphng camdwigd at aka power fieddy Phaft combmed faw y Ahmutm,amdHnbor,and&e Amb combwed for&e apm coad canceakkkm vwe San Owfie„Bmtmgtm s and Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-10 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling GA Power Plant GUMS FstinaAess Larval Fish Concentrations by Month at Central/Northern California Rower Plant OTC Intake LO Xr- Bay-Harbor Open Coast 1.S rr +a 1.0 015 0.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ftua*'?_Total cowenbratim of L-m-al by month at OTC imbkes m central Caihfimaa Data soazces based c teed 316(b)smWhng condneted at each power faeddy.Plants com3b1_ed fir bay4iaibw mmenbratims were Mom Bayp Mass L np atd Pour 4,aSd ihP plants used for the opm coast concenhati40S was Diab1D CanymaL Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-11 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Power Plant CWS Estimates Appendix A. Sources for cooling water data used to calculations of entrainment and impingement estimates Average Flow Design Flow (mgd)based on Plant (mgd) 2000-2005 Data Sources JAlam tos"Generatmg'Station Units 1&2 207 °," 121 difa from,SWRCB staff-'2000-05 actual monthlyAows Alamitos Generating Station Units 3&4 392 281 data from SWRCB staff-2000-05 actual monthly flows [Ala} it iR6erierating Station Units 5&6` 674 413 data`from SWRCB�staff-2000.05`actual'monthly floyus Contra Costa Power Plant Units 6&7 440 257 data from plant staff-daily flows for 2000-2005 Diablo,Canyon Power'Plant 2,528 2,287 flows from plant source complete for,2000-05 El Segundo Generating Station Units 1&2 207 69 data from SWRCB staff-daily flows for 2000-2005 ,EI$eggn'do Generatng Station Units 3&4 399 265 data from SWRCB staff-dady'flows.br20o0"2005, Encna Power Plant 857 621 flows from plant source complete for 2000-05 �e6k,'Ge66ratingStation 108 59 data from SWRCB staff-2000-01 actual monthly flows,2002-'05 daily flows Haynes Generating Station 968 258 data from SWRCB staff-2000-01 actual monthly flows,2002-05 daily flows,2005 missing for Units 3&4 Hunimgtan'Beach Generating5tation 514 178 data from SWRCB,staff-2004-05 actual monthly flows,2000-03 calculated from megawatt a 'output Mandalay Generating Station 253 234 data from SWRCB staff-2000-05 actual monthly flows Morro Bay Power;Plant'. : 668 A257 flows from plant sOUrceFCOmplete for 2000 05 Moss Landing Power Plant Units 1&2 361 193 _ flows from plant source complete for 2000-05 Moss Landuig Pov"der Plar t Units,6&7 865 387 frorri°planLsodece`coinplete for"2000-05 Ormond Beach Generating Station 685 521 data from SWRCB staff-2000-05 actual monthly flows Pittsburg Power Rlant,Urnls�5&B A6� �141 274 datafrg_m plant staff-�2000-05�daily`flows �'� Potrero Power Plant 231 193 data from SWRCB staff-2000-05 actual monthly flows-also plant data provided same _ average _ Redondo Generat ng,S,t tion;,,Umts 596 217" � 51 d from S RCB staff,-dadyflows'for 1011'/01=9f3 1/1/03-12/31105 Redondo Generating Station Units 7&8 675 254 data from SWRCB staff-daily flows for 1011101-9/30/02 and 111/0 3-1 2/3110 5 $ari bnofre ucl ar Gene at r data froniA8WRCB,staff-,2004,-.05 actualrmonth" -IyBows,-2o0f]=and 2003 calculated`from N r g Statio��Uft1t°2 " 1;2�19 9 � f1,19 x _ � t * .me awatt o � T'i- 7 ' ' San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 3 1,219 1,154 data from SWRCB staff-2004-05 actual monthly flows,2000 and 2003 calculated from _ megawatt output _ o'G n aSao .`, ,,,, 4 3G39 � data from w111iRCB� s#ff i]O(1T al mon�oily s� South Bay Power Plant 601 417 flows from plant source complete for 2000-05 Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-12 Water Quality Control Policy on the Use of Coastal and Estuanne Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Power Plant CWS Estimates Appendix A. Sources for cooling water data used to calculations of entrainment and impingement estimates. Average Flow Design Flow (mgd)based on Plant mgd 2000-2005 Data Sources EVESERISM Alamitos Generating Station Units 3&4 392 281 data from SWRCB staff-2000-05 actual monthly flows Contra Costa Power Plant Units 6&7 440 257 data from plant staff-daily flows for 2000-2005 ONNOMEMENEEMEM ON I mom El Segundo Generating Station Units 1&2 207 69 data from SWRCB staff-daily flows'for 2000-2005 Encina Power Plant 857 621 flows from plant source complete for 2000-05 Haynes Generating Station 968 258 data from SWRCB staff-2000-01 actual monthly flows,2002-05 daily flows,2005 missing for Units 3&4 Mandalay Generating Station 253 234 data from SWRCB staff-2000-05 actual monthly flows Moss Landing Power Plant Units 1&2 361 193 flows from plant source complete for 2000-05 Ormond Beach Generating Station 685 521 data from SWRCB staff-2000-05 actual monthly flows Potrero Power Plant 231 193 data from SWRCB staff-2000.05 actual monthly flows-also plant data provided same avera e Redondo Generating Station Units 7&8 675 254 data from$WRCB staff-daily flows for 10/l/01-9/30/02 and 1/l/03.12/31/05 EM mom San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 3 1,219 1,154 data from SWRCB staff-200405 actual monthly flows,2000 and 2003 calculated from megawatt out ut_—_ South Bay Power Plant 601 417 flaws from plant source complete for 2000-05 Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-12 Water Qual►ty Control Pol►cy on the Use of Coastal and Estuarine Waters for Power Plant Cooling CA Power Plant CWS Estimates Appendix B. References and information on studies used in compiling the data presented in Tables 1 and 2 Plant Entrainment collection period&frequency/Reference Impingemement collection penod&frequency/Reference Alamifas;Generahrig Sabo 'Units`,1&i Jan' e.r,0M6 br,weekl�4iM� and Tenera 7-oi a r " �ti Jan 20U Zec3�2006 weekly l MBG and'Tenera 2D0$a .. nut z Alamitos Generating Station Units 3&4 Jan-Dec 2006,bi-weekly/MBC and Tenera 2008a �Jan 2006-Dec 2006,weekly/MBC and Tenera 2008a �Alainitos Generatng Station Units 5&6'�Jan-Dec 2006','bi-w&ktyt/MBCIW,,Tenera'^2008a=� Jan 2006 a 2006r weeTc)y/,`MB,C ands 'ne'ra 2008a _ Contra Costa Power Plant ra T Apr 1978-Apr 1979,weekly/Ecological Analysts 1981a Apr 1978-Apr 1979,weekly sampling/Ecological Analysts 1981a D b Canyon Pw�Pla Qet 198?Jun t799;wee t /estimatesfromOt9&CYot�9 zene �20 a" F,e85-Mar 13 ,uvee#tlyFsamg ly� er1988 El Segundo Generating Station Units 1&2 Jan-Dec 2006,monthly/Tenera and MBC 2008 Jan 2006-Dec 2006,monthly/Tenera and MBC 2008 e '-ww - 7. r .ro.�-7 h �• rE Ik, egundo Geirerating�Sta ion yg#I3&A""Jan-Dec'2006;rndh hly,/�Tener`a and M�6 2008` � � - Jah 2006-Dec 2006,in ATenera and MBC 20D 3' Enana Power Plant Jun 2004-May 2005,monthly!Tenera 2008 Jun 2004-Jun 2005,weekly!Tenera 2008 larbor'Genera gStation an=Dec'20Q6?b ee„y;iMBC,= Hera an"rURS 008fi ,�> r�° JanQ0D6-Deg¢ p0 �Vee y110 1' ene' URS200Bb'<<= -� Haynes Generating Station Jan-Dec 2006,bi-weekly!MBC,Tenera,and URS 2008a Jan 2006-Dec 2006,weekly/MBC,Tenera,and URS 2008a Hunts gto�`eac i Ge ahrig,Statrori p 20 lug 0 `ekly`I M t;:and eT bra 2005' � il Jul`2003 lul%2 tt4 eklyr/JM eand ieenera 2005`" Feb 2006-Feb 2007,biweekly/rates and totals from ENSR Corp Mandalay Generating Station Feb 2006-Feb 2007,biweekly/ENSR Corp 2008a 2008a,average rates and HT data from N PDES data supplied by MBC Morro Bay PowerLLPlant Jf an 2(�]O. D_,ec 2D00,xwee Iy/Tenera,2001 F'- s�� Sep=1999`,Sep 20DU,weekly l Tenera_200,��� Moss Landing Power Plant Units 1&2 Mar 1999-Feb 2000,weekly/Tenera 2000b x Nov 2005-Nov 2006,weekly/Tenera 2007b Moss Lanc7rng Paver PlanttUrnts &7 tNa�1 9,-Eeba2t)00;wgeRiy!{Te 'ra 204lyrlTin�;200,b Feb 2006-Feb 2007,biweekly/rates and totals from ENSR Corp Ormond Beach Generating Station Feb 2006-Feb 2007,biweekly/ENSR Corp 2008b 2008b,average rates and HT data from N FIDES data supplied by MBC FflttSburg,P -r Plant Units 5&fi 1978r arp19i'9;ryeekty,Ec o�ica!AnalysCsj981b _ � M 1 79ar 8_Mar 197, ',we lyfsampimg//Ecolo Ic I.Ahaly 19 k a - _ _ Potrero Power Plant Jan 2001-Feb 2002,weekly(Dec-Mar)or monthly Apr-Nov)!Tenera 2007a May 2006-May 2007,weekly/Tenera 2007a RerJondoZ en atiri :St o Units 5&66 Jan,2006`-'Janj20 onm }hl /;MRG,ani}Terieras b 1 n` Ja =Q07"� k " g 3 7 i F- ;wee ly,/'M C a d Tura` 8t � ..�sa .w...»..�w..�:5... ,a4"`fu .r..au .. .. - fi. � �` ...r._SY.- Redondo Generating Station Units 7&8 Jan 2006-Jan 2007,bi-weekly /MBC and Tenera 2008b Jan 2006-Jan 2007,weekly/MBC and Tenera 2008b an"Q"Rfret oledr� ene taklot tJ Mar2tu16-Apr200�7,`b*eekt ihsdeplant;"inonthl at ore(intatte IUla�fy Ma 200f biw� ekly3% San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Un Mar 2006-Apr 2007,biweekly inside plant,monthly at offshore intakes/MBC Mar 2006-May 2007,biweekly/MBC 2008 cotter Fiod GLrterah hb Station ,,� " Jan 20D6-Jan 2d07. =vieekt / Jan 2006 Jan 2D07,Reekfy 1,M17lBC Tenera and=URS 2008c y tdIBC Tenera and`URS,>20080' 3 � South Bay Power Plant Feb 2001-Jan 2002,monthly/Tenera 2004 Dec 2002-Nov 2003,weekly/Tenera 2004 Final Substitute Environmental Document Page E-13 From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 01 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6349 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Patricia Goodman Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant. The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair. These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Patricia Goodman 18531 Bentley Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92648 714-847-6617 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 38 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject- Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6358 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Mary Ann Gordon Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant. The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include: pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair. These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. I look forward to hearing from you, Mary Ann Gordon 22022 Catalina Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 7149682681 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i From: Diana Gresty[dgresty@earthlink net] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9 01 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon falls to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like Increased conservation, water recycling and Infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Diana Gresty 8172 Munster Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH TOMORROW "Making a difference today for Huntington Beach tomorrow" P O BOX 865, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 PHONE (714) 840-401 5 E-MAIL INFO@HBTOMORROW ORG www.hbtomorrow.org May 27, 2005 Huntington Beach City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Subject; EIR Comments, Poseidon Draft Environmental Impact Report Huntington Beach Tomorrow appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Poseidon Draft EIR. HBT reviewed the document and finds information missing and insufficiencies in the proposal. This new draft of the Poseidon EIR still does not meet the standard necessary for certification. • The EIR does not discuss the viability of other methods of providing water as alternatives to the Poseidon facility. These alternatives include expanded residential and commercial conservation efforts, agricultural conservation, water recycling, and groundwater and beach well desalination. • It does not include a comparison of the environmental impacts and efficiencies of production of Poseidon's proposed desalination plan to alternative methods • Desalination by reverse osmosis (RO) has not been proven practical at this scale anywhere in the country Most existing RO plants, such as in Carlsbad CA, are a fraction of the size of the proposed Poseidon plant and therefore cannot be used as a true comparison of its functionality and impacts. Since the only other plant near to the size of the proposed Poseidon plant is the recently completed Tampa Florida facility, its major operational difficulties and deficiencies and cost overruns should be evaluated to assess what environmental impacts they have caused. What environmental impacts has the Tampa project created? And how do they apply to this project? • There are still no specifics in this EIR stating who will be the actual recipient of the water generated by Poseidon. • The EIR does not specify what measures Poseidon will take to ensure its claim that production will be used to meet existing needs rather than acting as a catalyst of more growth in Orange County. • The EIR states that since Poseidon uses AES's ocean water intake, there should be no new restrictions on that intake, such as improvements to AES's high level of impingement If this were approved o How would limiting restrictions to improvements affect currently required impingement studies, i.e. as part of AES's retooling of Units 3 and 47 o What effect would limiting restrictions to improvements have on requiring AES to modify the intake to meet current standards? o What effect would limiting restrictions to improvements have on requiring AES to update its facilities to comply with future standards? • The EIR states that if the AES plant were to cease to operate, Poseidon would reserve the right to keep AES's ocean water intake lines, discharge lines, and main ocean water pumps. The EIR doesn't disclose where these pumps would be located. The EIR doesn't delineate a process of conversion to a completely self-contained Poseidon Where would the pumps be located? What would the process be to convert to a Poseidon-only facility? What agency would have jurisdiction over the regulation of the facility under those circumstances? The EIR should discuss these issues in detail • The EIR states that in some cases process water (water involved in cleaning of the system) would be allowed to go back into the ocean without treatment. Under what circumstances would untreated process water be allowed to go back into the ocean? How often would this happen? Why should this be allowed? • For safety of adjacent residents, the 1,000-gallon ammonia tank located outside on the plant grounds should be located in a building so that if a catastrophic failure of the tank were to occur for whatever reason, the resulting ammonia leak could be contained • The EIR fails to address impacts on the OCSD systems. What effects will the additional load from this plant have on OCSD systems, especially in terms of how it will affect OCSD's ability to handle dry-weather runoff treatment? What long-term damaging effects will the chemicals in the discharge from the plant have on OCSD pipelines and/or plant? • The EIR gives conflicting information about the plant's operating hours. In some portions, it talks about it running primarily at night to take advantage of cheaper energy, but in other portions, it talks about how the plant will run 24/7 Why is there a contradiction? What will the hours of operation be? While there are numerous other areas of concern, HBT submits that these issues and unanswered questions alone are sufficient to deny certification of this draft of the EIR and to require further development of the EIR to satisfy the aforementioned concerns. HBT recommends the EIR not be certified without the missing information and favorable answers to these questions being provided. Very truly yours, HUNTINGTON BEACH TOMORROW David Guido President From: Louise Gupta [Igupta@socal rr com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9 36 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon falls to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like Increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Louise Gupta 6211 Glenwood Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 From: Zach Halopoff[zhalopoff@gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 14 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Zach Halopoff 4801 Los Patos Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92649 From: David Hamilton [de hamilton@venzon net] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 54 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include- pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, David Hamilton 5401 Kenilworth Dr HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 From: Deb Hoard [da305h@yahoo com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11 40 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because It does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon falls to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like Increased conservation, water recycling and Infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I have friends In the Tampa Bay area, Poseidon's failed desalination plant still Irritates them They all said, Don't Do Itll I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Deb Hoard 406 20th Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Esparza, Pan From Dave Hoffman [dvehoffman@gmad com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 4 51 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Dave Hoffman 7887 Nomad Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Esparza, Patty From. Marinka Horack[horackm@hotmail com] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 3 47 PM To: Dave Hamilton, HB Talk Cc. Mark Bixby, Debbie McGuire, CITY COUNCIL Subject: RE [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners Poseidon has proved in their attempts to get the Carlsbad Position plant started, that they DO NOT have the financing to pay for the up to $550+ million project. Poseidon has not been able to sell the (junk) bonds for their project, and thus they lost the $350 million subsidy they begged for from MWD They came with the promise that their was no public risk- that it was all private enterprise. But that's a broken promise It's the taxpayers and the ratepayers that will ultimately have to pay for this extravagantly expensive project, as are the taxpayers in Tampa Bay The HB City Council seems to be ignoring all these red flags, and is still working to push the Poseidon SEIR vote through BEFORE the election Why don't they wait to see how Carlsbad Poseidon goes? Why is the city council so beholden to Poseidon? One little known negative impact of this plant (hidden away in the hundreds of pages of the report) is NOISE - 24/7/365 - blasting out to hundreds of neighboring homes The noise this plant would produce approaches the decibel level of a jet plane taking off. It's the kind of noise level that would cause police to quickly close down any loud party, but Poseidon neighbors would not have the option to call the police. They would have to live with it And so would the sick wildlfe at the Wildlife Care Center. Forget about birds even thinking of nesting at our newly restored wetlands' If the council members have any shred of decency and consideration for the citizens of Huntington Beach, they will reject Poseidon's throughly inadequate SEIR, and throw the carpetbagging snake oil salesmen out of town. Marinka Horack > From, de hamilton@verizon.net > To- greggdelong@verizon.net, cmcgough@surfcity.net; hbtalk@bixby org > Date, Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11.40.53 -0700 > CC. mark@bixby org > Subject Re- [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Those of us who closely follow the goings-on with the Poseidon desalination > project(R4RD, Surfrider, OCDC, 0 C. Coastkeeper, Food &Water Watch, > Environment Now, etc, etc.) have a good idea of the shenanigans this City > Council is up to The current HBCC is setting an ever higher level of > opacity in its dealings with developers. Poseidon needs 5 more acres > adjacent to the AES site on which to build its decal plant The school > property fits the bill. The HBCC had the land parcel designated as > "surplus" so it could be dealt away to yet another soon-to-be-bankrupt > private enterprise. The HBCC will probably work some kind of future land > swap with Poseidon wherein Poseidon will, first, get the land and, after it > becomes bankrupt, the City (e g the public) will get nada This will be > taking place in "closed session" and hidden from public view > In an era where the public is demanding more transparency from its local > government, our City government is going in an entirely different direction > toward being overtly opaque. On August 2, the HBCC approved a change to > Ordinance 3 44 which previously covered pipeline franchises for transporting > hydrocarbons---oil, gas, natural gas, etc The ordinance was changed to > include "and other substance". No where was this "other substance" defined > R4RD saw right through the ruse---the "other substance" was water. R4RD 1 > immediately put together a Public Records Act request for documentation and > communication records pertaining to this action The PRA request has yet to > be fulfilled but, to and behold, an agenda item for next Tuesday's Council > meeting is approval of the Poseidon Pipeline Franchise agreement. > That PRA request was not the first to go unanswered. In April 2009 R4RD > filed a request for information on any Poseidon franchise agreement. The > City denied that request because the agreement was still being "negotiated", > however, that PRA request remained open > Haven't we, the public, had enough of being cast as chumps? Haven't we, the > public, had quite enough of this City Administration's trickery and deceit? > I know I have We deserve better > Regards, > -Dave Hamilton > ----- Original Message ----- > From. <greggdelong@verizon.net> > To. "Cathy McGough" <cmcgough@surfcity net>, <hbtalk@bixby org> > Cc- "Mark Bixby" <mark@bixby org> > Sent Thursday, September 02, 2010 9 06 PM > Subject. Re. [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Cathy, > My understanding of the code is that this allows the city council to discuss > the possible purchase behind closed doors without benefits of transparency > to the residents. > The city is in a financial crisis and to think they would spend funds they > don't have to buy something to keep as open space would be a naive thought. > What the city chooses to do with the property after purchase would be > whatever our leaders felt to be in their best interest Their track record > proves they don't support open space > Gregg DeLong > ------Original Message------ • From. Cathy McGough > To• Evette > Cc- Mark Bixby > Subject. RE. [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Sent. Sep 2, 2010 8 50 PM > Dear Mr Delong, > The school district(HBCSD) owns the LeBard School site and is trying to > sell the site (or a portion) to the City for park expansion, Little League, > etc The Board has no interest in putting anything there that is more dense > than the surrounding homes, nor does the City. We all prefer park space. I > am not sure what the Gov Code is that is cited, but likely it is the Naylor > Act which requires schools to offer the site to cities at a reduced cost...a > good deal for the City Negotiations for sale of property are required to > be in Closed Session. > Cathy > -----Original Message----- * From hbtalk-bounces@bixby org [mai Ito:hbtalk-bounces@bixby org]On 2 > Behalf Of greggdelong@verizon.net > Sent- Thursday, September 02, 2010 5.11 PM > To. Mark Bixby; hbtalk > Subject. Re* [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > If this is city (resident) owned property, why isn't there more > transparency? Why does the city always chose to hide behind the ruse of > "Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956 8"? > If proceedings such as these are above board and in the best interest of the > (residents) city, why meet behind closed doors? > Gregg DeLong > -----Original Message----- • From- Mark Bixby <mark@bixby org> > Sender: hbtalk-bounces@bixby.org > Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16.56:39 > To: hbtalk<hbtalk@bixby org> > Subject- [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby.org > http•//www bixby org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby.org > http•//www.bixby org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby org > http•//www.bixby org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk > > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby org > http.//www bixby.org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk 3 HUNTINGTON BEACH TOMORROW "Making a difference today for Huntington Beach tomorrow" P O BOX 865, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 Phone (714)840-4015 E-Mad info@HBTomorrow org HBTomorrow org September 7, 2010 City Council City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 Subject Poseidon Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) Dear Mayor Green and City Council Members Huntington Beach Tomorrow requests that you reject the Poseidon SEIR as inadequate Numerous project impacts exist that are not addressed satisfactorily HBTomorrow addressed them in previous iterations of the EIR and they still have not been resolved here Chief among them are Intake • The plan to grandfather the use of intake pipes deemed so deleterious to marine life that the State requires the method to be phased out by 2014 Outfall • The direct discharge of super-saline brine coupled with process chemicals instead of requiring the effluent to be processed through the OCSD treatment and outfall Growth inducing impact in Orange County • Though the SEIR states there will be no growth inducement from this project, Huntington Beach's Beach-Edinger Specific Plan identifies the Poseidon desalination project as a source of water for the planned increase in density of development Noise • Insufficient analysis of the impacts of 24/7 processing on nearby neighborhoods and wildlife in the recently restored wetlands adjacent to the plant Original CDP still under appeal • Though the Coastal Commission found substantial reason for appeal of the CDP issued in 2006 by the City on six grounds, these same six issues are still included and not addressed in the SEIR Attached herewith are previous comments by HBTomorrow which still pertain to the project HBTomorrow asks that you continue action on the SEIR and CDP until conditions of approval are developed that satisfactorily address these impacts Karen Jackle President From: Myrna Kelsey[myrnakelsey@gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 40 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject. Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Myrna Kelsey 18561 Florida St #2043 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 714 369 8943 HUNTINGTON BEACH TOMORROW P O. BOX 865, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 "Making a difference today for Huntington Beach tomorrowA7)�� " Phone: (714) 840-4015 E-Mail• info@hbtomorrow.org May 21, 2003 Planning Department City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach CA 92648 Subject: Poseidon Desalination Plant CUP/EIR Comments HB Tomorrow has reviewed the EIR, EIR responses and CUP/EIR staff reports. Our findings are as follows: The discharge of reverse osmosis train first flush effluent to the ocean outfall in lieu of the OCSD sewer line has not been adequately assessed. Disposal of first flush effluent to the ocean should be denied as an acceptable alternative to disposal through the OCSD system. The noise control conditions have insufficient remedial action if exceeded. Continuous monitoring and recording of noise levels by the applicant should be required for the life of the facility to ensure required noise levels are not exceeded. Loss of tax revenue if this plant is sold or taken over by a governmental or other non-taxable entity is unacceptable. The loss of tax revenue is especially crucial since the facility is in a redevelopment area that was formed to tax advantage of property tax increments to finance local area improvements. A condition of approval is needed requiring the applicant to agree to a binding contractual commitment or covenant which requires this and any future property owner to pay property taxes or equivalent tax in-lieu payments . The financial and health impacts of the construction and use of the proposed pipe line to Costa Mesa on the citizens of this city has not been assessed and mitigation measures delineated. The elements of a franchise agreement that adequately compensates the city and its citizens for use of public property should be known and agreed upon prior to project approval. Recommendation: Continue action on the EIR and conditional use permit until conditions of approval are developed that satisfactorily address the above concerns. Edward Kerins President, Huntington Beach Tomorrow From Nancy Koch [nkinhb@gmail com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 11 10 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon falls to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Nancy Koch 21341 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 15 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6352 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Kimberly Kolpin Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant. The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include. pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Kimberly Kolpin 5202 Edinger Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92649 7147176304 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i Esparza, Patty From patricia kreamer[pat_kreamer@verizon net] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 3 21 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, patricia kreamer 18111 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 7146256750 i From: S Levine [sandylevine@lycos com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 2 03 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant. The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include. pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, S Levine 1703 East Calaveras Street Altadena, CA 91001 From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 03 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 6350 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Jane Lazarz Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include: pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Jane Lazarz Kenilworth Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649 714-841-7564 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7 55 AM To- CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6339 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Harvey Levin Description: I'm in favor of the Seawater Desalination Huntington Beach Facility I'm asking the City Council to vote yes on this very worthwhile project It will benefit all of Orange County as well as our city. Harvey Levin 8566 Sierra Cir. #911-D Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 35 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 6356 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Sherri Loveland Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant. The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Sherri Loveland 11085 Matthew Drive Tustin, CA 92782 714-552-0333 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 150 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC -----Original Message----- FromStephenson, Johanna Sent Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1 42 PM To Ramos, Ricky Subject FW Reject Poseidon's SEIR -----Original Message----- FromChris Ann Lunghino [mailto chrislunghino@gmail com] Sent Tuesday, September 07, 2010 11 42 AM To CITY COUNCIL Subject Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent and sustainability advocate, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use, and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately address alternatives to ocean desalination, including increased conservation, water recycling, other low impact development methods, and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions that ensure future water supplies and require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require fewer financial resources than the Poseidon plan Please reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Chris Ann Lunghino 18292 Twinford Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 714 369 9280 i From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11 08 AM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6342 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Don MacAllister Description: Please approve the action item you have on the agenda for Sept 7 regarding,the Poseidon project. We need more sources of water and it will also help the economy of HB. yours, Don thewaterman Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note- This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 22 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6354 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Mike McMahan Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include. pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come. Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. I look forward to hearing from you, Alexa McMahan 4892 Maui Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 714 846 8571 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i From Michael McMahan [mcmahan44@yahoo com] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 8 52 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Michael McMahan 4892 Maui Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 From: Mike Meer[mike2@mmcmm org] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 7 41 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Most of this letter is a form letter I fully support what is written in this letter' Don't ignore us I look forward to hearing from you, Mike Meer 9082 Mediterranean Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-745-8986 From- Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 3 38 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request 4 6348 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Pete and Linda Minko Description: Please vote AGAINST the Poseidon desalination project It is a project that is not in the best interest of our ocean or city with a company that has yet to prove itself positively in this field Be responsible to the people that voted you into office and vote against this. Look at the Coastal commission report and see the inadequacy of the SEIR Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 49 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surFaty-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 6363 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Joan Mortenson Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant. The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include. pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. I look forward to hearing from you, Joan Mortenson 2612-B Del Way Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i EsEarza, Patty From: Flynn, Joan Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 9 27 AM To: 'murphyeileen555@gmail com', Esparza, Patty Subject. Re Administrative item on Agenda for Tuesday Night please deny SEIR desalination Thanks Eileen --this will be placed in the record Joan Joan L Flynn, CMC Huntington Beach City Clerk From: Eileen Murphy <murphyeileen555@gmail.com> To: Flynn, Joan Sent. Sat Sep 04 09:20:58 2010 Subject: Administrative item on Agenda for Tuesday Night. please deny SEIR desalination Dear Mayor Green and Council Please deny Poseidon Resources Desalination for HB The SEIR is inadequate and should be redone. The cavalier way they handled Dr. Vandersloots comments is unconscionable Planning said that Dr.. Vandersloots letter was dated 2005 and Dr Vandersloot died in 2009. Someone must have sent the comments or how did they get in the record? If they were from 2005 and the EIR is from 2005 they should have been answered anyway The Admmisrative item on Tusday's Agenda which is three items and will be heard concurrently The public should have been heard on each of the three items. Respectfully submitted Eileen Murphy 201 21 st Street HB 92648 91711D From: Eileen Murphy[murphyeileen555@gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6 18 PM To- CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Eileen Murphy 201 21 st Street H B, CA 92648 7143740380 From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 48 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6362 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Stephanie Pacheco Description: The Orange Coast Water District, as a public agency, protected what would have been the destructon of our groundwater basin Let's follow that format, rather than subsidizing a private company looking out only for their bottom line,that will not provide citizens with healthy, affordable water, using less energy. I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant. The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include: pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. I look forward to hearing from you, Stephanie Pacheco 18264 Santa Belinda Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored 1 From: Rana Sabeh [rasabeh@yahoo com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11 06 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include. pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon falls to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like Increased conservation, water recycling and Infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Rana Sabeh 18901 Valley Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 7147174424 Esparza, Patty From. Susan Schaben [suedeemer@yahoo com] Sent, Saturday, September 04, 2010 11 50 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Susan Schaben 21281 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-960-7482 i From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 33 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6355 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Scott John Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include: pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come. Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, John Scott 22032 Capistrano Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-962-1746 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i From: Raymond Sherrard [rhsenterpnses@earthlink net] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 49 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon falls to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Raymond Sherrard 4701 Los Patos Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92649 From: Joan Singleton Desingl@yahoo com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 49 PM To• CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Joan Singleton 21702 Branta Cr Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714 968-4902 i Esparza, Patty From: Bob Smith, Ph D [BobSmithTTL@gmail com] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 9 48 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local manne life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Bob Smith, Ph D 21352 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714 536 1084 i From: Scott Smith [scott@1talltrees com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10 37 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Scott Smith 21341 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 7145363703 From: Suzie Smith [Suzie@1talltrees com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 19 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Suzie Smith 21352 Yarmouth Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-536-1084 From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 40 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 6360 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Alice Speakman Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include- pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair. These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, alice speakman 8932 biscayne huntington bch, CA 92646 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored i From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 36 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6357 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Penney Stergios Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant. The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include. pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come. Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. I look forward to hearing from you, Penney Strergios Penney Stergios 3798 Mistral Dr. Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored 1 From: Carrie Thomas [hbmaupim@yahoo com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 39 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Carrie Thomas 6642 Trotter Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92648 From: James Thomas[hbmaugimbo@yahoo com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 42 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject• Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you regarding your position on Poseidon's Desal project Hopefully you are listening to those who voted you in office and not the developers who come here, screw things up and leave town with their pockets full and leave HB to clean up their mess, James Thomas 6642 Trotter Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 From: Kris Thomas [island girl2@yahoo com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 46 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant. The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, and will be watching the upcoming Council meeting on which I hope to see you reject Poseidon's SEIR There's no benefit to me for this project that will degrade our ocean Kris Thomas 6642 Trotter Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92648 1 Esparza, Patty From: Joetta Thompson pojst@aol com] Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 3 33 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR I As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Joetta Thompson 21731 Impala Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 1 From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 46 PM To: CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request#6361 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. i Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Harold Tieger Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Harold Tieger 8565 Trinity Circle-823A Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note- This message is for notification purposes only Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i Esparza, Patty From: Stephanie Tran [stephaniehb2k@yahoo com] Sent• Friday, September 03, 2010 6 07 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Stephanie Tran 6621 Brentwood Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i From: Aaltje van Kneken [aalltjevk@hotmail com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 10 43 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Aaltje van Kneken 922 Lake Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 From: Julian Vochelli Dvochelli@socal rr com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 11 07 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Julian Vochelli 19322 Pitcairn Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646-2919 714 963-3143 From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user govoutreach com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 4 13 PM To- CITY COUNCIL, agendaalerts@surfcity-hb org Subject: Surf City Pipeline Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 6351 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Comment on an Agenda Item Citizen name: Luc Waeyenbergh Description: As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant. The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include: pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come. Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair. These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. I look forward to hearing from you, Luc Waeyenbergh 5891 Par Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Expected Close Date: 09/02/2010 Click here to access the request Note. This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. i From: Craig Wagner[cwagner9@verizon net] Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 8 29 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Craig Wagner 9172 Bermuda Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92646 From: Linda Warner[grelinda@socal rr com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 30 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon falls to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like Increased conservation, water recycling and Infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Linda Warner 8199 Wildwood Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714 969-1289 Esparza, Patty From. Ramos, Ricky Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 1 26 PM To- Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 10 23 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW. Support Desalinization Plant From: Meg Waters [mailto:MWaters@watersandcompany.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 10.02 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Support Desalinization Plant Dear Council Members I urge you to support the Poseidon Desalinization Plant at the council meeting tonight Orange County needs to reduce its dependence on "imported water" This is an excellent opportunity for us to become more water independent, and I hope it will serve as a model that other coastal cities can emulate Sincerely, Meg Waters President 9 TV ATM G I C O ON N U N l CAI I DR S Note New Address... 14 Dauphin Dana Point, CA 92629 Office: 949/429-1855 Cell:949/584-4977 Fax: 949/429-1856 meq@watersandcompany.com www.watersandcompany corn i Es pa rza, Patty From: Norm Westwell [ovsd @modem pu bl ic com] Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 1141 PM To: jflynn@surfcityu-hb org Cc: Esparza, Patty Subject: Late Communication for Agena items 4-1 through 4-5 Dear City Councilmembers I urge you to approve Agenda Items 4-1 through 4-5 pertaining to the Poseidon Saltwater Desalination Project Public safety will be enhanced with the full approval of this project Thank you Ocean View School District Trustee Norm Westwell 17200 Pinehurst Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 714 847 2551 ovsd(8-modernpublic com � i0 Z19-72E G/nM L,c /ca1,.Oa From: Dan Whitesell [dan whitesell@gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 6 03 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources. I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Dan Whitesell 17922 Shoreham Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 From: Lois Whitley[mamamamaui@gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 48 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant It does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant and does not benefit me or my neighbors in any way The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon falls to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and Infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Lois Whitley 6381 Reubens Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92647 From: Phillip wilder[wooddude41 @aol com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7 24 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come. Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Phillip wilder 9432 molokai dr hunt beach, CA 92646 I Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent- Tuesday, September 07, 2010 125 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Poseidon LC From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 9.11 AM To: Ramos, Ricky Subject: FW Pro desalination Project From: Scott Williams [mailto.scottwilliams@socal.rr com] Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 9:06 AM To: CITY COUNCIL Cc: blochrie@faubelpublicaffairs.com Subject: Pro desalination Project I live here in the City of Huntington Beach and I believe we need the Poseidon Desalination Plant Let's turn salt water into fresh water and beautify California and lower our water rates This project is a no brained We need plants like this in every large city along the California Coast Thank you, Scott Williams 7975 Southwind Circle Huntington Beach, Ca 92648 1 From: Brian Zeek[Brian@SurfCitylnsurance com] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 5 11 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair. These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Brian Zeek 5302 Hendricksen Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92649 From: Carol Zwaans [carol@zwaans us] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 8 30 PM To: CITY COUNCIL Subject: Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the Impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed Include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environment, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Carol Zwaans 19531 Sardinia Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 714-964-9493 Esparza, Patty From: WMSB@aol com Sent Friday, September 03, 2010 5 00 PM To: horackm@hotmail com, de hamilton@verizon net, hbtalk@bixby org Cc: HB@odo bixby org, debmcduck@aol com, CITY COUNCIL, mark@bixby org Subject: Re [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners One might get Jerry Browns attention on the matter as the locals will never do anything, he cut his teeth on Bell Ca, so may be ready for HB It took the feds to get the midget felon and Pam It all boils down to$$$ as no benefit to locals Just have to figure out and follow the money trail The mothers milk of Politics Barry In a message dated 9/3/2010 3 47 11 P M Pacific Daylight Time, horackm@hotmail com writes Poseidon has proved in their attempts to get the Carlsbad Posidon plant started, that they DO NOT have the financing to pay for the up to $550+ million project. Poseidon has not been able to sell the Ounk) bonds for their project, and thus they lost the $350 million subsidy they begged for from MWD They came with the promise that their was no public risk -that it was all private enterprise. But that's a broken promise. It's the taxpayers and the ratepayers that will ultimately have to pay for this extravagantly expensive project, as are the taxpayers in Tampa Bay. The HB City Council seems to be ignoring all these red flags, and is still working to push the Poseidon SEIR vote through BEFORE the election Why don't they wait to see how Carlsbad Poseidon goes? Why is the city council so beholden to Poseidon? One little known negative impact of this plant (hidden away in the hundreds of pages of the report) is NOISE - 24/7/365 - blasting out to hundreds of neighboring homes The noise this plant would produce approaches the decibel level of a jet plane taking off. It's the kind of noise level that would cause police to quickly close down any loud party, but Poseidon neighbors would not have the option to call the police They would have to live with it. And so would the sick wildlfe at the Wildlife Care Center Forget about birds even thinking of nesting at our newly restored wetlands' If the council members have any shred of decency and consideration for the citizens of Huntington Beach, they will reject Poseidon's throughly inadequate SEIR, and throw the carpetbagging snake oil salesmen out of town. Marinka Horack > From: de.hamilton@verizon.net > To. greggdelong@verizon.net; cmcgough@surfcity net, hbtalk@bixby.org > Date. Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11.40.53 -0700 > CC- mark@bixby.org > Subject- Re: [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Those of us who closely follow the goings-on with the Poseidon desalination > project(R4RD, Surfrider, OCDC, O.0 Coastkeeper, Food &Water Watch, > Environment Now, etc , etc ) have a good idea of the shenanigans this City > Council is up to. The current HBCC is setting an ever higher level of > opacity in its dealings with developers. Poseidon needs 5 more acres > adjacent to the AES site on which to build its desal plant The school > property fits the bill. The HBCC had the land parcel designated as > "surplus" so it could be dealt away to yet another soon-to-be-bankrupt I > private enterprise The HBCC will probably work some kind of future land > swap with Poseidon wherein Poseidon will, first, get the land and, after it > becomes bankrupt, the City (e g. the public) will get nada. This will be > taking place in "closed session" and hidden from public view. > In an era where the public is demanding more transparency from its local > government, our City government is going in an entirely different direction > toward being overtly opaque On August 2, the HBCC approved a change to > Ordinance 3.44 which previously covered pipeline franchises for transporting > hydrocarbons---oil, gas, natural gas, etc. The ordinance was changed to > include "and other substance" No where was this "other substance" defined. > R4RD saw right through the ruse---the "other substance"was water. R4RD > immediately put together a Public Records Act request for documentation and > communication records pertaining to this action The PRA request has yet to > be fulfilled but, to and behold, an agenda item for next Tuesday's Council > meeting is approval of the Poseidon Pipeline Franchise agreement. > That PRA request was not the first to go unanswered In April 2009 R4RD > filed a request for information on any Poseidon franchise agreement. The > City denied that request because the agreement was still being "negotiated", > however, that PRA request remained open. > Haven't we, the public, had enough of being cast as chumps? Haven't we, the > public, had quite enough of this City Administration's trickery and deceit? > I know I have. We deserve better > Regards, > -Dave Hamilton > ----- Original Message ----- > From- <greggdelong@verizon net> > To. "Cathy McGough" <cmcgough@surfcity.net>; <hbtalk@bixby org> > Cc. "Mark Bixby" <mark@bixby.org> > Sent. Thursday, September 02, 2010 9.06 PM > Subject: Re- [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Cathy, > My understanding of the code is that this allows the city council to discuss > the possible purchase behind closed doors without benefits of transparency > to the residents. > The city is in a financial crisis and to think they would spend funds they > don't have to buy something to keep as open space would be a naive thought. > What the city chooses to do with the property after purchase would be > whatever our leaders felt to be in their best interest Their track record > proves they don't support open space. > Gregg DeLong > ------Original Message------ > From. Cathy McGough > To• Evette > Cc- Mark Bixby > Subject: RE: [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > Sent: Sep 2, 2010 8.50 PM > Dear Mr. Delong, > The school district (HBCSD) owns the LeBard School site and is trying to > sell the site (or a portion) to the City for park expansion, Little League, 2 > etc. The Board has no interest in putting anything there that is more dense > than the surrounding homes, nor does the City. We all prefer park space. I > am not sure what the Gov. Code is that is cited, but likely it is the Naylor > Act which requires schools to offer the site to cities at a reduced cost ..a > good deal for the City. Negotiations for sale of property are required to > be in Closed Session > Cathy > -----Original Message----- • From: hbtalk-bounces@bixby.org [madto hbtalk-bounces@bixby.org]On > Behalf Of greggdelong@verizon.net > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:11 PM > To: Mark Bixby, hbtalk > Subject- Re- [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > If this is city (resident) owned property, why isn't there more > transparency?Why does the city always chose to hide behind the ruse of > "Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8"? > If proceedings such as these are above board and in the best interest of the > (residents) city, why meet behind closed doors? > Gregg DeLong > -----Original Message----- • From Mark Bixby <mark@bixby.org> > Sender. hbtalk-bounces@bixby org > Date. Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:56.39 > To. hbtalk<hbtalk@bixby org> > Subject. [HBTALK] attention anti-Poseidoners > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby.org > http://www.bixby.org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby.org > http.//www.bixby org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby.org > http://www.bixby.org/madman/listinfo/hbtalk > hbtalk mailing list > hbtalk@bixby org > http://www.bixby org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk hbtalk mailing list 3 Ihbtalk@bixby.org http•//www bixby.org/mailman/listinfo/hbtalk 4 Esparza, Patty From: Flynn, Joa Sent- Tuesday, eptember 07, 2010 8 50 PM To: Esparza, Pa#yam Subject: Fw Attn Cathy Pikes f Joan L Flynn, CMC Huntington Beach City Clerk From- Fikes, Cathy To: CITY COUNCIL, Cathy Green <ppcgreen@verizon net>, Devin Dwyer <j.devi ndwyer@verizon.net>; Don Hansen <donfh@balboacapital.com>, Gil Coerper <glcoerpi@gte net>; Jill Hardy <jill@jillhardy.com>; Keith Bohr <keith.bohr@gmail com> Cc: Flynn, Joan Sent. Tue Sep 07 20.30.19 2010 Subject: FW. Attn Cathy Fikes From: Al Arizmendez [mailto al@millergeer.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 4:23 PM To: Fikes, Cathy Subject: Attn Cathy Fikes Hi, Regarding the HB desalination facility, I'm a former resident who has family and friends currently living in Huntington and I support the development of the facility Please share this with the entire HB City Council Thanks Al Arizmendez i Esparza, Patty From: Flynn, Joan Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 8 51 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject Fw In Support of the HB Seawater Desalination Facility ------Original Message------ FromCathy Fikes To CITY COUNCIL To Cathy Green To Devin Dwyer To Don Hansen To Gil Coerper To Jill Hardy To Keith Bohr Cc Flynn, Joan Subject FW In Support of the HB Seawater Desalination Facility Sent Sep 7, 2010 8 31 PM From susan lister [mailto susanlister@me com] Sent Tuesday, September 07, 2010 12 23 PM To Fikes, Cathy Subject In Support of the HB Seawater Desalination Facility Hello Cathy Could you please forward this email of my support to the City Council We strongly support the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility We will be joining the supporters at the City Council hearing tonight Thank you Susan Lister cell 949 400 1887 susanlister(a)-me com Joan L Flynn, CIVIC Huntington Beach City Clerk i Esparza, Patty From. Flynn, Joan Sent- Tuesday, September 07, 2010 8 51 PM Cc: Esparza, Patty Subject: Fw HB Seawater Desalination Facility Joan L Flynn, CMC Huntington Beach City Clerk From- Fikes, Cathy To: CITY COUNCIL, Cathy Green <ppcgreen@verizon.net>, Devin Dwyer <j.devindwyer@verizon net>, Don Hansen <donfh@balboacapital com>; Gil Coerper <glcoerpi@gte.net>, Jill Hardy <jill@jillhardy com>, Keith Bohr <keith.bohr@gmail.com> Cc: Flynn, Joan Sent- Tue Sep 07 20:33:38 2010 Subject. FW- HB Seawater Desalination Facility From: Michelle Hail [mailto beebizzynjafra@cox.net] Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 10:00 PM To: Fikes, Cathy Subject: HB Seawater Desalination Facility Dear Cathy Fikes, I am writing in regards to the Seawater Desalination Facility I support this Facility and believe it will be a great asset to the city Please forward this to the City Council Thank you, Michelle Cunel-Hall i Esparza, Patty From: Flynn, Joan Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 8 52 PM To Esparza, Patty Subject: Fw desal project Joan L Flynn, CMC Huntington Beach City Clerk From- Fikes, Cathy To- CITY COUNCIL; Cathy Green <ppcgreen@verizon.net>; Devin Dwyer <J.devindwyer@verizon net>; Don Hansen <donfh@balboacapital com>, Gil Coerper <glcoerpl@gte net>; Jill Hardy <jill@Jillhardy com>, Keith Bohr <keith bohr@gmail.com> Cc. Flynn, Joan Sent- Tue Sep 07 20.34.23 2010 Subject: FW: desal project From: Karin Lewis [mailto-karinl228@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 2:23 PM To: Fikes, Cathy Subject: desal project I support the HB desal project (please forward this to the City Council) Thank you Karin Lewis i Esparza, Patty From: Flynn, Joan Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 8 52 PM To. Esparza, Patty Subject: Fw Poseidon Project Joan L Flynn, CMC Huntington Beach City Clerk From. Fikes, Cathy To. CITY COUNCIL; Cathy Green <ppcgreen@verizon.net>, Devin Dwyer <j devindwyer@verizon net>, Don Hansen <donfh@balboacapital com>, Gil Coerper <glcoerpl@gte.net>, Jill Hardy <jill@jillhardy.com>; Keith Bohr <keith bohr@gmail.com> Cc Flynn, Joan Sent: Tue Sep 07 20.35.03 2010 Subject: FW. Poseidon Project From: Barbara Delgleize [mailto:Barbara@BarbaraSellsTheBeach.com] Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 4.31 PM To: Fikes, Cathy Subject: Poseidon Project AdftL FROM THE DESK OF 3 . Barbara Delgleizic DRE#0058W8 ,r www.BarbaraSellsTheBeach+com RF/AI D Hello, I personally believe that this project is vital to the long term health and safety of our community I ask that our City Council support and approve this project Sincerely, Barbara Delgleize 1 Takmita T�'ghtap EcoBroker NAR Green Designation HB Chamber of Commerce—Chairwoman '09 HB Planning Commissioner RE/MAX Select One 4952 Warner Avenue,Suite 109 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Direct 714-846-1247 Cellular 714-421-0103 Fax 714-846-5595 Email Barbara@ Barba raSellsTheBeach com Website www Barba raSellsTheBeach com DRE#00586458 ATTENTIONI This e-mail may contain PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL material and its transmission is not a waiver of that privilege It is intended for the sole use of the individual or entity named above If you are not the intended recipient,please be notified that any use,disclosure,review,distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited If you have received this e-mail by error,please delete it and notify the sender immediately Thank you 2 Esparza, Patty From: Flynn, Joan Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 8 50 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Fw Attn Cathy Fikes Joan L Flynn, CMC Huntington Beach City Clerk From: Fikes, Cathy To. CITY COUNCIL; Cathy Green <ppcgreen@verizon net>; Devin Dwyer <j devindwyer@verizon net>; Don Hansen <donfh@balboacapital com>; Gil Coerper <glcoerpi@gte net>; Jill Hardy <jill@jillhardy com>; Keith Bohr <keith bohr@gmail com> Cc: Flynn, Joan Sent. Tue Sep 07 20:30:19 2010 Subject- FW: Attn Cathy Fikes From: Al Arizmendez [mailto:al@millergeer com] Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 4.23 PM To: Fikes, Cathy Subject: Attn Cathy Fikes Hi, Regarding the HB desalination facility, I'm a former resident who has family and friends currently living in Huntington and I support the development of the facility Please share this with the entire HB City Council Thanks Al Arizmendez i Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10 16 AM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: FW Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination For your files -----Original Message----- FromStephenson, Johanna Sent Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7 52 AM To Ramos, Ricky Subject FW Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination -----Original Message----- FromJames Torres [mailto jimtorres@msn com] Sent Tuesday, September 07, 2010 5 33 PM To CITY COUNCIL Subject Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination favor this project James Torres Huntington Beach Sent from my Phone 1 Esparza, Patty From: Ramos, Ricky Sent Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10 17 AM To: Esparza, Patty Subject. FW Reject Poseidon's SEIR For your files -----Original Message----- FromStephenson, Johanna Sent Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7 50 AM To Ramos, Ricky Subject FW Reject Poseidon's SEIR Good morning Should I continue to send these to you?? -----Original Message----- FromKatja Flores [mailto jflores19@socal rr com] Sent Tuesday, September 07, 2010 8 30 PM To CITY COUNCIL Subject Reject Poseidon's SEIR As a constituent, I urge you to reject Poseidon Resources' Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for their proposed ocean desalination plant because it does not adequately address the impact of the proposed desalination plant The CA Coastal Commission staff and other state agencies found that some of the problems not fully addressed include pipes running through contaminated groundwater, destruction of local marine life, massive energy use and a questionable financing plan for which ratepayers may pay for years to come Furthermore, Poseidon fails to adequately discuss alternatives to ocean desalination like increased conservation, water recycling and infrastructure repair These alternatives are solutions to ensuring future water supplies that require less energy, are less harmful to the environni ent, and require less financial resources I urge you to reject Poseidon's Supplemental Environmental Impact Report I look forward to hearing from you, Katja Flores moontide h b , CA 92646 i ep-07.2010 0 23 9 PM City of Costa Mesa 714-754.4913 1/3 i IDate: Se tern er 7,2010 5MFAX Number of a es fncludip!g cover sheet 3 TO: Joan L.Flynn. FROM: Minoo Ashabi City Clerk Senior Planner Huntington Beach City of Costa Mesa RE, Subsequent EIR (Seawater Planning Division Desalination Project) Developinent Services Dept. n O Box 1200 Costa Mesa CA 92628-1200 Phone 714/536-5227 Phone (714)754-5610 Fax 714/374-1557 .l ax (714)754-4856 Email: CityClerlsA enda@a surfcity- hb or REMARKS: @( ,For your � �( Please call of you have questions Information Attached please find City of Costa Mesa's I tier requesting modification to mitigation measure for the above noted project. This fetter was also emailed to City Clerk's mail address. Please let me know if you have any questio s Thank you. ETIE� Sep-07-2010 03:29 PM City of Costa Mesa 714-754.4913 213 e - CEUT (DIP OSITA M921 P O BOX 1200 - 77 FAIR DRIVE - CALIFORNIA 92$28-1200 } r 09VSLOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT September 7, 2010 City of Huntington Beach Attn' Ricky Ramos Planning Division, 3rd Floor 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject. FINAL SUBSEQUENT Ell —SEAWATER DESAILINATION PROJECT Dear Mr. Ramos: Thank you for the Notice of Publi Hearing and the copy of Subsequent Final Environmental Impact Report for the iSeawater Desalination Project. As noted in the response letter dated June 21, 2010, t e City has significant concerns on the construction and traffic impacts of the pipeline proj ct within the City of Costa Mesa. Staff does not believe that the Responses to Corn ents and deferred mitigation have adequately addressed the significant construction related environmental impacts within the City of Costa Mesa. In general, the SEIR defers mitigation elated to air quality, noise and traffic to the future preparation of a Traffic Management F Ian. It should be noted that the proposed pipeline alignment as well as Traffic Management Plan related to construction within the City of Costa Mesa will require a thorough analysis of the environmental impacts and approval of an encroachment permit by the Co�ta Mesa City Council. In addition, short-term environmental impacts/mitigation measures have not been fully identified; therefore deferral of this analysis will likely result in additional time to process the encroachment permit. -_are-requesting-that the-Huntington_Beach City Council- consider amending-Mitigation Measu[e _CON-31J(page -5-9=33_of_- ection =5.9 - Construction Related Impacts) to_-' Incorporafe the following additional Ian-uage:/ ® Complete closure of two-la ic residential streets (i.e. Elden Avenue) for construction work is prohibited One lane shall always remain open at all times. Lane closures on arterial streets are limited to one lane only. No construction is allowed at night time in residential areas or on streets adjacent to residential areas. Pedestrian/bicycle/and busine 3s access shall be provided at all times during construction, 8u1lding Dlvlslon(714)7$4-$273 Code Enforcement(714)754 5623 - Planning Dlvaslon(714)754-$24$ FAX(7141 754.4856 TDD(714)754-5244 - www ci costa-mesa c9 us Sep-07-2010 03:29 PM City of Costa Mesa 714-754.4913 3/3 i Mr Ramos (Final Subsequent EIR-Seawater D salination) September 7,2010 Page 2 The Traffic Management Plan shall address adequate compensation (i.e. financial or otherwise) to businesses t at may be adversely impacted during construction and which may be submitting claims against the City for compensation for those impacts. The compensation cpmponent of the Traffic Management Plan shall be subject to reviewlapproval o the Development Services Director and Public Services Director ® Developer will conduct a minimum of two community workshops with local business owners/residents to xplain short-term construction impacts prior to start of construction and address concerns. A minimum 10-day notice shall be provided to property owners within 500 feet of the project area for the community workshops. Developer shall address comments received at the community workshops to the fullest exte t possible to the satisfaction of the Development Services Director. Developer shall note that the rterials considered for placement of pipeline in the City of Costa Mesa are major arterials and cannot be subject to major closures, especially during the day. In addition, due to the proximity to residential development, closures at night on select arterials will not be permitted. These limitations shall be considered n the construction timellne. The SEIR defers developmerill of the Traffic Management Plan. Developer shall note that the short-term environmental impacts/mitigation measures have not been fully identified at this sta e. The City of Costa Mesa may require additional environmental analysis to address the short-term construction impacts, and therefore deferral of this analysis may result in additional time required to process the encroachment permit. We believe it is critically important to amend Mitigation Measure CON-31 to adequately address these impacts. We hope that the Huntington Beach City Council includes the suggested text amendments prior to adoption option of the Final EIR at its hearing on Tuesday, September 7, 2010. Sincer ly, KIMBERLY BRA T, AICP PETER NAGHAV Development Se ' es Director Public Services Director CC. Raja Sethuraman, Transportatior Svs. Manager Minoo Ashabi, Senior Planner dT1)La, ® 5 E I HD 0 N R E S ® U R C E S s RECEIVED FROM 4 ASF PUBLIC RECORD FOR C I FETING September 3, 2010 CITY CLERK OFFICE JOAN'L FLYNN,CITY CLERK Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council I City of Huntington Beach t 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA i Subject: Seawater Desalination Project at Huntington Beach —Community Noise Issues Honorable Mayor and Council Members, We are aware of issues raised by Jason Pyle regarding the noise study that was prepared for the Subsequent EIR (SEIR) for the Desalination Project. I recently contacted Mr. Pyle to better understand his concerns, and also understand that Joe Monaco with Dudek, the consulting firm that prepared the SEIR, has also spoken with Mr. Pyle. Based on those conversations, I understand Mr Pyle's concerns to be focused in two areas 1) the time of day in which noise sampling was conducted, and 2) use of the noise ordinance standard of 50 dBA Leq for nighttime noise as a benchmark for noise attenuation design purposes Based on my conversation, and information provided by Mr. Monaco, I believe that there are commitments that we can make now to address and satisfy Mr Pyle's concerns We propose to take these measures on a voluntary basis, and with this letter, commit to the following measures Design-Level Noise Assessment The SEIR includes mitigation that requires noise attenuation for the proposed outdoor pumps, and requires monitoring of noise levels after construction to ensure that the standards established in the City's Noise Ordinance are not exceeded. To provide I additional assurance that the design of the noise attenuation structures will achieve the desired effect on initial construction, and avoid any subsequent retrofits, we commit to conducting an additional noise study at the project design stage, when more detailed information on pump specifications and configurations are available. Additionally, to further address Mr Pyle's concerns, the sound level sampling will be conducted at approximately 3 a m This should provide additional assurances on the predictions for ambient noise levels at the most noise sensitive times of day Noise Attenuation The SEIR requires that the project-generated noise be confined to the limits established in the City's Noise Ordinance Mr Pyle's concern is that the 50 dBA Leq nighttime Poseidon Resources 501(Nest Broadway Suite 2020 San Diego CA 92101 USA 619 595-7802 Fax 619 595 7892 residential noise standard allows an undesirably high increase of noise To address this concern, we commit to providing noise attenuation beyond what is required by the City's Noise Ordinance for the proposed outdoor pumps We commit to attenuating the project- generated noise, with the intent being to avoid a perceptible increase in noise at the nearest residential property, but allowing up to a 5 dBA increase above the calculated nighttime ambient noise levels at the nearest residential property line, based on ambient noise levels determined in the Design-Level Noise Assessment We believe that by providing additional assurances on the initial design of noise attenuation measures, and by providing the additional sound attenuation, we would address the concerns of Mr Pyle, and other members of the community that may have similar concerns Sincerely, C,60sZeidon tt Maiona Resources ARDIN'AL G tang 13 t AF 11 HL"ncu > v O Hey ILURM, F Z w a a o?�= TEXAS �'' c"w AV AV �JoH AV 14 CORRAL RIVER CT d { _ JER EY a a m o C 33 o z TEAL 15 LOS CABALLOS ST +� �- Ct( c�R GISLER w ���h�' ST � � �-�a ���. GARlIt1G- 3 OW A l05 CABALLOS CT ��i/t �3 "'`'a `QS aI, o J o 16 Fa D ST � d z C 1 16 Q --• . - < �• . a a OWL 17 KINGS CANYON ST _y `i ` ORIOL 1 sv �C� �, w �+ Q � oA �R J Q,�w NaRSORr o pafAUVILLE ^g ` a N CIR 1$ MESA VRDE_C ;r y� 'n Q,Qo yy ti� ST v a r-q [tWt �.^, w AV M GARFIELD`� , ' °`` %° ` Q4 ° n aAt-',m`C°crv� SAMOA 'CANT£RBURY D c m DR OAT 7>m AI Fo- v�i C . 'i a j d,ram« zw^w FF� 1 %Q �� PQ� `' w~�^""ANDER OR r� 'p�' gTSD ,' E"""'I 7ANA DR"...."`. .. , � dC� 0 ��dfi� �c �Ai iWAY DR RL SRIN q o'N � 5„'; m cc rvi P?ESA V> Rt�E �s��; 61 ; �� DR rwRrnER f �� `tom �� 4 �qs�o���; p � �� `EN" NUTMEG ' GALWAY m o POINtE d WINT RGRE ce r ems- _DR M�+ * t PL m v GOLF COURSE ti OvrfN C RSIGAPL c> °o DRY" w A � WA._D r� ¢ SUN OR � ,� 0 ,� ► `�,'�'4/I �a i p STD 1r C1D � t � A o cooK i' 1 - �C� } � ` MYRTLEWOOD .sr BAKE ST U PA P j}J. e g J^j.Yi'/ f,M * € �i/ V� p N 7 YQ J OGAN »u ,�, EC T �° Lte o ST pA E v �- �� R r� 3 CLUBHOUSE y yITI G pip '"p `'� SANDALN03 Q Z J AV tKTOWW CHRISTMAS D b!Y z t / '�.F `j'ra NNITE aA w VILLAGE R= MUNITOR DR . A cQ, 1 ' ' �P� � :�r o Pp Op OQ PPL q ST n w 14 - w RLA � f Q�, G� �y �,, P PRIMROS a Q w a D z SHANG Q 1 r `r ` ` QAHU S a " o Y Q� 5 • R 1 �' KO DR su �R. . ,� �'� QW-, m �� ��&qP, S R s a R`- c` z w+ a t fIL EMNOS DR 's MBrA l�~ ?04 , Mq , _ ,��. 0 MI oRCAM q_ ST IN D - J w AL640S j [r L r o G GiPo .W $A y 6 ) �� SA z 4 1PARJ( o C? , � 1 p� PONDERO o )R Z v I �' M OR-t r gALTRA PL o g N i L'.G�1'�.�p�AfE Lu ©MCP �� f, N V j LURum a SHALb, ' C3R PAROS ,�, �� v� I j PL os ELM K 1 DR URETANIA I 1 gALEARI� ©R m Z CIR ' F� QtIODES 0 ��� O N o"� ° `fT PO S AV iE ADAMS Q` ORONSAY a CAPELLA VISTA v J c cF ,A r c CIR J Oa S a ESTANCIA, mow, CIR w MESA VERDE a ORANGE f CIR 5 z E ;� CAPELIA z PARK? IiD CENTER o COAST ' K { ,"�, I Iw C LVER7 AV PITCAIRN .�,.,,,,.� '> v, 0 CIR �' � r � k `�...� �Z�`� E.z� � COLLEGE 9 , ~ IG?a�i �, r,a F aaC� a .� Humou taa J� C' o� F ESA VERDE d } SONS � � t e EVE PL�� PELICAN PLC R z a I o OLDEN TW,I.EI CT ' °� NAGER22 '� 41 'Mf(NDARIN'DR" �s y Y. ti• y �.. .. Y s a tAC�RA DR" o { Q ... ©�s y �snu' �`��a c� "-' PARK !> ILL WESLEY R S PHALAROPE MERRI Mq oR CIR p t f i h �CT WY *, R o OR �' SWAN _ RINCEON D I P ,, , K DR CLUBHOUSE 4� AP Q I k TAq� . FAI RV I EW 1 COSTA M SA �� � V j ANAL A. swn E 5 a W. �Dp DR PA K I ��"~StiELLEY �� r� ref r "' �L u E� R LN �© F` GO s URSE, FAIRV7EW �� °A� aG mow` BUGKNELL Ra °SEE �A•i , 1 L1 ` } t I �t�? #iI rALEERT t c DEVLOPMEN7At. R , s S SHELLEV K� c Eta I NATURE g HatSHt a r' i t CENTER �?, , FAIR DR n x a .� Pl ESERVL 3 Ckl,4FINGiCRDS DR �CYNTHIA b - j 4 WON iota 44--f r �" S OR _ -- _ i y. LEAGUE OF ORANGE �"t g, COUNTY + fir+(+ 7 rpy ���l�'N 4.�,1:a 1✓���.L'V$ DIVISION �j CAI"I�1FI^{O�1,�Y" IA 600 WEST SANTA ANA BOULEVARD SUITE 214 SANTAANA,CALIFORNIA 92701 C_'1 d SJ.:S TELEPHONE (714)972-0077 FAX (714)972 1816 www occgiec org "Serving the Public Servant" July 29,2010 RECEIVED FROM + AS PUBLIC RIECOR klEETI CITY GUkLE K I"ri E Mr. Scott Malone JOAN LA FLYNN,CITY CLERK ANAHEIM A Vice 'resident AH BREA Poseidon Resources BUENA PARK 17011 Beach Blvd.,Suite 900 COSTAMESA Huntington Beach,CA 92647 CYPRESS DANAPOINT Dear Mr,Maloni, N FOUNTAI VALLEY FOUNT N On July 21, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Orange County League of Cities GARDEN GROVE voted enthusiastically to,endorse the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination GA GARD NG RO BEACH Facility, Clearly, reverse osmosis seawater desalination is a technology whose time has come, and the project provides another tool to help "drought-proof' IRVINE Orange County and decrease our need for imported water, which has become LA HABRA increasingly more expensive and unreliable LA PALMA LAGUNA BEACH The desalination facility planned in Huntington Beach will be built by Poseidon LAGUNA HILLS Resources, a private company, at no cost to the taxpayers The construction of the LAGUNA NIGUEL facility alone will result in more than 2,000 much-needed jobs and the facility will LAGUNA WOODS provide more than $2 million annually in new tax revenue for the City of LAKE FORhSr Huntington Beach. LOS ALAMITOS MISS10N VIEJO With the Groundwater Replenishment (GWR) System, Orange County is in the NEWPORT BEACH vanguard of wastewater recycling and indirect potable reuse, With the addition of ORANGE the Poseidon Resources desalination project, Orange County will enhance its PLACENrIA reputation as the worldwide leader in the development of sustainable and state-of- RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA the-art water reliability proj ects SAN CLEMENTE SAN CLANENTE RAND More than a dozen Orange County cities have already passed resolutions of support of this needed water reliability project, Eight other Orange County cities have SEAL BEACH signed Memorandums of Understanding (MOU) to purchase a portion of the TUSTIN product water VILLAPARK WUSTMINSTER The Orange County League of Cities is proud to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with YORBALINDA the Orange County Busine8s Council, the Orange County Taxpayers Association,a bipartisan coalition of state and federal legislators representing Orange County as well as municipalities throughout Orange County to support and endorse this environmentally sensitive and financially sound public-private partnership project that wilt protect Orange County's water needs for future generations. i ! Sincerely, Jeiry Amante 'President Orange County Division,League of California Cities I PRESIDENT Jerry Amanle,Mayor Pro Tem Tustin FIRST VICE PRFSIDFNT Cheryl Brothers Conoul Member Fountain Valley SECOND VICE PRESIDENT Reber,Mmg,Mayot Lagoon Niguel, ADVOCACY COMMITPLL CHALk Pcler Itcrzog Mayo.Pro Tarn Lake foresr STATE LEAGUE DIRECTOR Richard Dixon,Council Member,lake Fuiebl,PAST PRESIDENT L Allan Sonpud,Ir,Ci,tmcd Member Giguna Hilk, CITY AT-I ARGE REPRESLN IAI IVLS Gil Cecrper,Cmmud Member,lluntinglon Beach Steve Jones Mayor Pin Tem Gamlen Glow Pam Keller Mayo,No Tem Fullerton DISTRICT AT-LARGE REPRESENTATIVES 1ST DISTRICT-Margie Rice,M,tyor Weumutsler 2ND DISTRICT Mark Waldman Mayoi Lo Palma, 3RD DISTRICT Imrics Itheins,V4ryot,Villa Park 4TH DISTRICT Scott Nclson Council Member Placcn[m 5TH DISTRICT-Lisa Bartlett,Mayor Dana Pond, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTATIVE Tim 0 Donnell,City Manager Bmu EXECUTIVE DIRLCIOK lruy Kelly RESOLUTION NO 2010-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER DESALINATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts that will purchase the water to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents and businesses of Orange County, and WHEREAS, the Division has been advised that the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources; and WHEREAS, Orange County cities will be more self-reliant by developing their own water resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state, and NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Orange County Division, League of California Cities hereby supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21 st day of July, 2010 Jerry Amante, President RESOLUTION NO. 2010-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH SEAWATER DESALINATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts and several Orange County cities; and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project will be sited, permitted, built and operated without taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide fifty million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents in Orange County, and WHEREAS, the City has been advised that the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; and ' WHEREAS, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, Orange County's Water wholesaler, has identified the desalination plant as an important component of the region's diversification strategy; and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought; and WHEREAS, Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing its own water resources and thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALISO VIEJO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Support the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of May 2010. t Phillip 8 Tsunoda Mayor ATTEST: &'t� "-/,- " Susan A Ramos City Clerk PROVED AS TO FORM: Scott C. Smith City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ALISO VIEJO ) I, SUSAN A. RAMOS, City Clerk of the City of Aliso Viejo, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No 2010-14 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Aliso Viejo at their regular meeting held on the 5th day of May 2010, by the following vote, to wit AYES; COUNCIL MEMBERS- Tsunoda, Garcia, Phillips NOES. COUNCIL MEMBERS. None ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS. Cave, Ficke SUSAN A. RAMOS CITY CLERK (SEAL) I hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2010-14 duly passed and adopted by the Aliso Viejo City Council at their regular meeting held May 5, 2010. 2,-,,'!:� . SUSAN A. RAMOS CITY CLERK (SEAL) City Council Agenda June 22, 2010 Page 5 to Section 3 28 080H of the Buena Park Municipal Code will serve the best interests of the City due to L-3 Communications being the sole-source provider for the preferred equipment APPROVED t ecommended action. S. RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON I3EACI-1 SEAWATER DESALINATION FACILITY Recommended Action Adopt a resolution supporting the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility ADOPTED the following titled resolution I NO 12405 9. PROCLAMATIONS a Buena Park Youth Theatre 3dh Anniversary Recommended Action Approve proclamation APPROVED the recommended action END OF CONSENT CALENDAR NEW BUSINESS (10 a 14) 10. RESOLUTION TO DISSOLVE FULLERTON AIRPORT NOISE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE Staff report by Joel Rosen, Director of Community Development Recommended Action Adopt a resolution dissolving the Airport Noise and Safety Committee and establishing an ad hoc staff committee to perform the Fullerton Airport liaison function MOTION CARRIED to adopt the following titled resolution RESOLUTION NO 12406. t q ' yyet { F RESOLUTION NO 12405 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BUENA PARK, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH SEAWATER DESALINATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts and several Orange County cities, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide fifty million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents of Orange County, and WHEREAS, the City has been advised that the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and WHEREAS, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, Orange County's Water wholesaler, has identified the desalination plant as an important component of the region's diversification strategy, and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought; and WHEREAS, Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing its own water resources and thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Buena Park hereby supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of June 2010, by the following called vote AYES COUNCILMEMBERS Marshall, McCay, Dow, Smith, Brown NOES* COUNCILMEMBERS None ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS_ None ABSTAIN COUNCILMEMBERS. None RESOLUTION NO 12405 Page 2 Mayor ATTEST: Z� uty City Clerk I, Teresa Jackson, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Buena Park, California, hereby certify that the forego►ng resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Buena Park, held this 22nd day of June, 2010. u y City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 10-04-12-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DANA POINT, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER DESALINATION FACILITY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DANA POINT, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination protect that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts, including South Coast Water District, that will purchase the water to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination protect is expected to provide 50 million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents and businesses of Orange County, and WHEREAS, the seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought; and WHEREAS, the cities of Orange County will be self-reliant by developing their own resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dana Point, California, hereby supports the construction and operation of the' proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 12`h day of April, 2010 Steven H Weinberg, Mayorl ATTEST Kat4 M Wa d, City Clerk Resolution No 10-04-12-02 Page 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF DANA POINT ) I, KATHY WARD, City Clerk of the City of Dana Point, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No 10-04-12-02, and was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Dana Point, California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of April, 2010 by the following vote, to wit AYES Council Members Anderson, Bartlett, Bishop, and Mayor Weinberg NOES None ABSENT Mayor Pro Tern Schoeffel KA HY M WARD CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO 2009-10-27-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH SEAWATER DESALINATION FACILITY The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills, California, hereby finds, determines, declares, and resolves as follows: WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being developed by Poseidon Resources and will be sited, permuted, and built without taxpayer or rate payer dollars; and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of drinking water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents and businesses of Orange County; and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, Orange County's imported water wholesaler, has identified the dEsalination plant as an important component of the region's water diversification strategy; and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought; and WHEREAS, Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing its own water resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the State, and WHEREAS, the Moulton Niguel Water District and El Toro Water District have signed non-binding letters of intent to diversify their water portfolio by purchasing desalinated seawater from the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility in order to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. A. The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility. B The City Council of the City of Laguna Hills hereby authorizes the Mayor to send letters of support to both the State Lands Commission and California Coastal Commission. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED th►s 27th day of October, 2009. JOEL LAUTENSC GER, MAYOR ATTEST PEGGY J JOHI' , C►TY LERK 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF LAGUNA HILLS ) 1, Peggy J Johns, City Clerk of the City of Laguna Hillsffi. California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No 2009-10-27-1 adopted by the City Council of the City of Laguna Hil Is, California, at a Regular Meeting thereof held on the 27th day of October 2009, by the f®Ilowing vote: AYES- Council Members Carruth, Scott, Songstad, Mayor Pro Tempore Bressette, and Mayor Lautenschleg-ter NOES: None ABSENT None ABSTAIN: None (SEAL) PEG6-Y J JOI-INS CITY CLERK r I 1 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2009-973 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER DESALINATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and will be sited, permitted, built and operated without taxpayer or ratepayer dollars, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of drinking water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents and businesses of Orange County; and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; and WHEREAS, 80% of Moulton Niguel's water is imported from outside of Orange County, and WHEREAS, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, Orange County's imported Water wholesaler, has identified the desalination plant as an important component of the region's water diversification strategy, and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought and, WHEREAS, Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing its own water resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state, and WHEREAS, the Moulton Niguel Water District is one of more than a dozen Orange County water districts that has signed a non-binding letter of intent to diversify its water portfolio by purchasing desalinated seawater from the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility in order to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of . Laguna Niguel, California, hereby supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility Resolution No. 2009-973 Page 2 LET IT BE FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Laguna Niguel, California, hereby authorizes the Mayor to send a letter of support for the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility to both the State Lands Commission and California Coastal Commission PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of October 2009. 7Yo�vz, Ro ert Ming Mayor ATTEST- Pamela Lawrence Deputy City Manager/Acting City Clerk CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE )SS CITY OF LAGUNA NIGUEL ) I, Pamela Lawrence, Acting City Clerk of the City of Laguna Niguel, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing is Resolution No. 2009-973 which was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Laguna Niguel, California, held October 20, 2009 by the following vote: AYES Council Members Brown, Capata, Glaab, Mayor Pro Tem Lindholm and Mayor Ming NOES None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT None Pamela Lawrence Deputy City Manager/Acting City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 09-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA WOODS, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH DESALINATION FACILITY EREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts that will purchase the water to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required; and WHEREAS, the proposed desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents and businesses of Orange County, and WHEREAS, the City is advised that the proposed desalination project 'has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as, its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought, and WHEREAS, the cities of Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing their own water resources, and thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state; and WHEREAS, the El Toro Water District, which serves the residents of the City of Laguna Woods, has signed a letter of intent to purchase desalinated seawater from the proposed desalination project NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAGUNA WOODS, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS R 09-25 HB Desalination Facility 1 11-18-09 i SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Laguna Woods, California, does hereby support the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Desalination Facility. SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to send a letter of support' for the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Desalination Facility to both the State Lands Commission and California Coastal Commission. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2009. Lr' ROBERT B RING, Ma 7 ATTEST: ) YOLI , IPPY, Deputy C4iklerkJ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF LAGUNA WOODS ) I, YOLIE TRIPPY, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Laguna Woods, do HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 09-25 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Laguna Woods at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 181h day of November 2009, by the following vote. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Conners, Hack, Rhodes, Robbins, Ring NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT- COUNCILMEMBERS: None c YOLIE PPY, Deputy City rk R 09-25 HB Desalination Facility 2 11-18-09 RESOLUTION 09-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER DESALINATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts that will purchase the water to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required; and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of water per day through the desalmation process, which is enough to,serve eight percent (8%) of the residents and businesses of Orange County; and WHEREAS, the City is advised that the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought; and WHEREAS, the cities of Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing their own water resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state; and WHEREAS, all three of the water districts that serve the City of Mission Viejo (El Toro Water District, Moulton Niguel Water District, and Santa Margarita Water District) have signed "Letters of Intent" to purchase water from the Poseidon Desalination Facility once it is constructed, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF MISSION VIEJO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2`' day of November, 2009. 3 ayor I, KAREN HAMMAN, City Clerk of the City of Mission Viejo, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Mission Viejo at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2' day of November, 2009, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Kelley, Ledesma, Schlicht, and Ury NOES: None ABSENT: MacLean ATTEST: KareV Hamman City JCIerk RESOLUTION NO. 10430 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER DESALINATION FACILITY. WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts that will purchase the water to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents and businesses of Orange County, and WHEREAS, the City has been advised that the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources; and WHEREAS, Orange County cities will be more self-reliant by developing their own water resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state, and NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Orange, California, hereby supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility ADOPTED this 9`h day of March 2010 Carolyn C t cche, Mayor, ity of Orange ATTEST: Mary hy, City �11 Orange I, MARY E MURPHY, City Clerk of the City of Orange, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Orange at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of March, 2010, by the following vote. AYES COUNCILMEMBERS Smith,Murphy, Cavecche, Dumitru, Bilodeau NOES COUNCILMEMBERS• None ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS None ABSTAIN. COUNCILMEMBERS None 1 Mary y, City Clerk, City of range RESOLUTION NO, 09-09-23-01 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER DESALINATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts that will purchase the water to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents and businesses of Orange County, and WHEREAS, the City is advised that the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversify Qrange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought, and WHEREAS, the cities of Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing their own water resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state, and WHEREAS, both the Santa Margarita Water District and Trabuco Canyon Water District, which serve the residents of the City of Rancho Santa Margarita, have signed letters of intent to purchase desalinated seawater from the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Santa Margarita, California, hereby supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility LET IT BE FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Santa Margarita, California, hereby authorizes the Mayor to send a letter of support for the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility to both the State Lands Commission and California Coastal Commission PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 23�d DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009 THOMPSON, MAYOR ATTEST: ," dl�-4 MOLLY MCLALTGHLIN,YCITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA ) M, Molly McLaughlin, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Santa Margarita, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No 09-09-23-01 adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Santa Margarita, California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 23rd day of September 2009, by the following vote: AYES 5 COUNCIL Beall, Blais, Thor, Mayor Pro Tempore MEMBERS. Holloway, Mayor Thompson NOES 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS- ABSTAIN 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS. OntL W( Molly Mcl_a ghlin, City berk RESOLUTION NO. 2010-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER DESALINATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts that will purchase the water to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents and businesses of Orange County; and WHEREAS, the City has been advised that the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources; and WHEREAS, Orange County cities will be more self-reliant by developing their own water resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STANTON, CALIFORNIA, hereby supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 27t" day of April, 2010 ED ROYCE, SR , MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM ALPH HA S , CITY ATTORNEY Resolution No. 2010-10 Page 1 f ATTEST: I, Brenda Green, City Clerk of the City of Stanton, California DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2010-10 has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the,City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the Stanton City Council, held on April 27, 2010, and that the same was adopted, signed and approved by the following vote to wit: AYES Donahue, Ethans, Royce, Shawver, Warren NOES None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN, None BRENDA GREEN, TY CLERK I ' I Resolution No. 2010-10 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-3125 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VILLA PARK, CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH SEAWATER DESALINATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts and several Orange County cities, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project will be sited, permitted, built and operated without taxpayer or ratepayer dollars, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide fifty million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents of Orange County, and WHEREAS, the City has been advised that the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and WHEREAS, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, Orange County's Water wholesaler, has identified the desalination plant as an important component of the region's diversification strategy, and ri WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought, and WHEREAS, Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing its own water resources and thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Villa Park, California hereby supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Villa Park held on the 22nd day of June, 2010 W Bill MacAloney, Mayor City of Villa Park AT -ST,� �b 1 Jar L"Hildenbrand, City erk u City of Villa Park STATE OF CALIFORNIA j GF J COUNTY OF ORANGE Ss CITY OF VILLA PARK 1, JARAD L. HILDENBRAND, City Clerk of the City of Villa Park DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Villa Park held on the 22 nd day of June, 2010, and was Garned by the following roll call vote, to wit I AYES COUNCILMEMBERS- --rrA-A 4, k,5 t,,,-(�a, AA NOES COUNCILMEMBERS t-)-— ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS r-_ ABSTAIN COUNCILMEMBERS Jar MIdenbrand, City Clerk City of Villa Park RESOLUTION NO. 10-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH SEAWATER DESALINATION FACILITY The City Council of the City of Tustin (the "City") does hereby resolve as follows WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Faciliti is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts and several Orange County cities, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project will be sited, permitted, built and operated without taxpayer or ratepayer dollars, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide fifty million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents of Orange County, and WHEREAS, the City has been advised that the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and WHEREAS, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, Orange County's Water wholesaler, has identified the desalination plant as an important component of the region's diversification strategy; and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought; and WHEREAS, Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing its own water resources and thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Tustin, California hereby supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular,meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 16th day of March 2010 f Resolution 10-27 Page 1 of 2 Y � ayor ATTEST- / PAMELA STOKE ,--*' City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five, that the above and foregoing Resolution No 10-27 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 161"day of March, 2010, by the following vote COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Amante, Nielsen, Davert, Palmer (4) COUNCILMEMBER NOES Gavello __(1) COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED None (0) COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT- None (0) PA ffl A STOKER, City Clerk s F i Resolution 10-27 Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 10-08-17-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER DESALINATION FACILITY j WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and will be sited, permitted, built, and operated without taxpayer or ratepayer dollars, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of drinking water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents and businesses in Orange County, and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, Orange County's imported water wholesaler, has identified the desalination plant as an important component of the region's water diversification strategy; and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversity Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought, and WHEREAS, Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing its own water resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state; and i WHEREAS, more than a dozen Orange County water districts have signed a non-binding letter of intent to diversify their water portfolio by purchasing desalinated seawater from the proposed Huntington Beach Desalination Facility in order to offset i the amount of imported water that is currently required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby support the construction and operation of the proposed j Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility. I I i i 1 8/17/2010 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTS this 17th y o ugust, 2010 ! Dr. Londres Uso, Mayor ATTFS Mari or is, City CI r I i STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss j CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) I, MARIA MORRIS, appointed City Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 10-08-17-01 was duly adopted by the Cit� Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano at a Regular meeting thereof, held the 17i day of August 2010, by the following vote: AYES: C UNCIL MEMBERS: Hribar, Nielsen, Freese and Mayor Uso j NOES UNCIL MEMBER- None ABSE T OUNCIL MEMBER: Allevato i I MARIA R S, Cit Jerk i I �I 2 8/17/2010 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-45 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA PALMA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING; THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER DESALINATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and is supported by several public water districts that will purchase the water to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required; and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent (8%) of the residents and businesses of Orange County, and WHEREAS, the City has been advised that the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversify Orange County's water resources, and WHEREAS, Orange County cities will be more self-reliant by developing their own water resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state, and WHEREAS, the City of La Palma supports the Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility, provided that the environmental concerns are addressed as much as feasibly possible. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Palma hereby supports the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of La Palma at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of August 2010. Steve hanahan, ayor ATT'EST- G?�rvu-c d A,y a Laurie A Murray, City CI ',1 101 11 Rego D?W 10-027 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF LA PALMA ) I, Laurie A. Murray, City Cleric of the City of La Palma, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of August 2010, and that it was so adopted by called vote as follows: AYES. Charoen, Herman, Rodriguez, Shanahan, and Waldman NOES None ABSENT- None ABSTAIN, None �yl Laurie A Murray, City Clerk ti 1.301 11 KCaM1 DVW I 021 RESOLUTION NO. 10-08-17-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED HUNTINGTON BEACH WATER DESALINATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility is a private seawater desalination project that is being brought forward by Poseidon Resources and will be sited, permitted, built, and operated without taxpayer or ratepayer i dollars, and I WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project is expected to provide 50 million gallons of drinking water per day through the desalination process, which is enough to serve eight percent of the residents and businesses in Orange County; and WHEREAS, the proposed seawater desalination project has received all of its local permits from the City of Huntington Beach, as well as its NPDES permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, Orange County's imported water wholesaler, has identified the desalination plant as an important component of the region's water diversification strategy; and WHEREAS, seawater desalination, along with water recycling, groundwater pumping, and imported water will collectively serve to diversity Orange County's water resources, which provides security in case of emergency or drought, and WHEREAS, Orange County will be more self-reliant by developing its own water resources and, thereby, lessen the pressure on the Sacramento Delta, which benefits both environmental and agricultural interests in the state; and WHEREAS, more than a dozen Orange County water districts have signed a non-binding letter of intent to diversify their water portfolio by purchasing desalinated seawater from the proposed Huntington Beach Desalination Facility in order to offset the amount of imported water that is currently required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano does hereby support the construction and operation of the proposed Huntington Beach Water Desalination Facility i I i 1 1 8/1712010 i PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTE this 17th d y o ugust, 2010 Dr. Londres Uso, Mayor ATTfS 1 I Mari or is, City CI r i STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss j CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO ) i I, MARIA MORRIS, appointed City Clerk of the City of San Juan Capistrano, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 10-08-17-01 was duly adopted by the Cit� Council of the City of San Juan Capistrano at a Regular meeting thereof, held the 17t day of August 2010, by the following vote I j AYES. C UNCIL MEMBERS Hribar, Nielsen, Freese and Mayor Uso j NOES. UNCIL MEMBER- None ABSE T OUNCIL MEMBER- Allevato /W MARIA R S, Cit Jerk x i i i I 1 i I i i 2 8/17/2010 O\\SaN WATER F o� 6 +, THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA s, P RECEIVED FROM rl\EOQ� AS PUBLIC RECORD C UNCkINWG OF CITY CLERK 0 CE Office of the General Manager JOAN L.FLYNN,CITY CLERK September 7, 2010 The Honorable Cathy Green Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Ms Green Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Project The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California(Metropolitan) supports the development of a seawater desalination project in Huntington Beach that would include participation of its four Orange County member agencies the Municipal Water District of Orange County(MWDOC), and the cities of Anaheim, Fullerton and Santa Ana The completed project would help diversify the water supply portfolio for Southern California's 19 million people and$800 plus billion-dollar economy Metropolitan recognizes that seawater desalination can provide increased water supply reliability during drought periods and supply disruptions caused by emergencies such as earthquakes or unexpected regulatory constraints These attributes would be of value to the Southern California region as well as other participating communities within Orange County The project will develop a new, local water supply that could help meet future demand in conjunction with imported supplies from the State Water Project(SWP)and Colorado River We have informed the project proponents of the technical requirements for integrating this supply into Metropolitan's regional pipelines and look forward to working with them on the design Through cooperative efforts, Metropolitan and the water agencies in Orange County are statewide leaders in water conservation,recycling, and brackish groundwater desalination However, additional local water management actions such as seawater desalination are needed to help the region manage long-term water supply risks and short-term disruptions to imported supplies The proposed Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Project(Project)would help secure supply reliability in Southern California against future uncertainties Thank you for considering our comments. Yours truly, �Deven N Upad ay Manager, Water Resource anagement WAT vs o\a\s\c\2010\WAT Huntinton Beach EIR Support Letter doc 700 N Alameda Street,Los Angeles,California 90012®Mailing Address Box 54153,Los Angeles,California 90054-0153•Telephone(213)217-6000 THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA The Honorable Cathy Green Page 2 September 7, 2010 cc Mr Kevin Hunt General Manager Municipal Water District of Orange County 18700 Ward Street Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Mr Peter M MacLaggan Poseidon Resources Corporation 501 West Broadway, Suite 840 San Diego, CA 92101 &Djgnct SHAWN NELSON _ Orange County Board of Supervisors Supervisor,Fourth District I `- Orange County Hall of Administration 333 W Santa Ana Blvd,P O Box 687Santa Ana,California 92702-0687 Phone(714)834-3440 Fax(714)834-2045 shawn nelson@ocgov com September 7, 2010 The Honorable Cathy Green -j'p VY HL M&Er Mayor, City of Huntington Beach r i., rK 0 FI6� 2000 Main Street ," ,N UTYCLERK Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Madam Mayor, Madam mayor and members of the city council. I intended to testify tonight at this public hearing,but I am the head coach of the Fullerton Pop Warner Junior Pee Wee Football team and was needed at practice. I support the Poseidon project as a former Director of the Orange County Water District and as an Orange County Supervisor. The answer to the drought is an increased water supply and conservation measures. Clean, affordable water is very important to our economy, standard of living and public health Poseidon resources will bring a new source of reliable drinking water to Orange County that will help to make Orange County independent to imported water. ° I encourage you to be bold, be leaders, and to support this much needed project. Most sincerely, SHAWVNELL RECEIVED FROM AS PUBLIC RECORD FQR�PNWCL- MEETU�of `=1� Sept. 7, 2010 CITY CLERK I JOAN I-FLYNN,CITY CLERK City of Huntington Beach Council and All Resposible Parties To be entered into Public Comment Documents Mayor Green, Council Members & Staff, I would like to direct my comments to several elements being heard this evening. I am particularly concerned with the Recommended Action to Waive a 30 day review of the Owner Participation Agreement. I would question first the mere legality of the Waiver and second, the reasoning behind this recommendation. Owner PARTICIPATION Agreement. We are here this evening to do just that. We, the public, who like to think our taxes and monies spent in Huntington Beach, make us OWNERS to a great extent, of city lands, would like to be ABLE to participate in just how these monies are spent. It is difficult, if not impossible to do so, when our rights to participate are waived. Thus, I would like to first, request that item 4-3 of tonight's Administrative items be withdrawn . Further, Section 33490 of CA redevelopment law requires City redevelopment to adopt an implementation Plan every 5 years. AES. PXP, and the ASCON properties are all included in ONE redevelopment zone. A plan that is valid until 2012. Referring to Goal #3, 1 do not see any mention nor description in the Implementation Plan that supports a water treatment facility. Edison and the tank farm, but not a water treatment facility. There is no mention of a water treatment facility in the master documents for the redevelopment zone even thought the City has been identifying this use at this parcel for some time. The purpose of the master document is to get public review and input, this an "informed" consent. How is that possible if it isn't mentioned? Now, you would proceed to waive review periods required by California law. And, where is the analysis of how this water facility may affect other aspects of the redevelopment zone? How does this project directly benefit the project area? An example. Looking at the redevelopment map on page 2 and then read what the document says on page 3 under AES. PXP is considering selling the tank farm on Magnolia. One of the stated plan goals is housing, probably the highest, best use of the tank farm property and it also would provide a chance to reduce the industrial footprint in the S. E. neighborhood. However, the PXP tank farm site would be directly across from the Poseidon desal plant, which logically will affect how the parcel can be used. The noise generated from the plant would be enough to reduce the value of any homes projected to be built on the site. Simply put, there are impacts to the redevelopment zone that are not being considered as they should be under both CEQZ and CA. redevelopment law. The City's redevelopment plan has a stated purpose to reduce blight and increase property values. Another industrial use at this particular site doesn't in any way accomplish this purpose, despite the good intentions of planting some trees and some fresh paint. Water treatment is an industry. The OPA Agreement: Item 6 on page 17 of the OPA states the City can use this $2,000,000. However they see fit but legally, isn't there a nexus between revenue in a redevelopment zone and a direct benefit to the zone or nearby neighborhoods? What are the plans for using this in S. E. Huntington Beach? What improvements will we see? In this same document, attachment #4, the convenant agreement. Section B states this land, the same parcel containing AES, PXP, and ASCON states that this land is subject to the 2002 redevelopment plan. This is the same plan that does NOT mention a water treatment facility. On page 3 of the covenant agreement mentions the City receiving another $1.9 million after the pipeline is completed to be used at the City's discretion. A pipeline from what? There is no mention of a water treatment facility nor transporting water from such a facility. Another interesting item in the OPA is a discussion about payments to the City if the property becomes tax exempt. How would this revenue be used? Section 101 Purpose of the Agreement. Could we discuss the benefits to the City of the OPA? One being that originally, the plan for a $10 million reservoir to be built by the Participant at no cost to the City. Now...........we would appear to be involved in a land swap for the reservoir. Why was the land not included in negotiations with Poseidon? Why would the city swap land it owns to a private company that already said it would built the reservoir at no cost. Land COSTS! No, I think we have some issues to review with the OPA. We need that 30 days to come to grips with what we get and what we are giving away. There has been a lack of review and impact analysis in the SE Coastal Project area redevelopment area that needs attention. We request that time. Merle Moshiri 19412 Pompano Lane. #107, Huntington Beach, CA. This letter is for the Administrative Record Merle Moshiri Southeast Coastal Project Area Five Year Implementation Plan (2007-08 to 2011-12) 5 The Agency has implemented projects and activities to eliminate blight in the Project Area and address these goals The following section will detail specific programs, activities and projects that the Agency has implemented, and that the Agency proposes to implement during this Implementation Plan period (2007-08 to 2011-12) SPECIFIC PROGRAMS AND POTENTIAL PROJECTS The Agency documented blighting conditions in 2002 with the adoption of the Report to Council, which accompanied the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area The physical and economic blighting conditions include the following • Unsafe/Unhealthy Buildings Though operation of the AES Facility has continued to be permitted due to power shortages, excessively high emissions at the AES generating facility pose health risks to surrounding residents and nearby habitat • Factors Hindering the Economically Viable Use of Lots Two main focus areas for redevelopment that are representative of this blighting condition are the AES Facility and the Ascon landfill o Due to the energy shortage for the past decade, the AES Facility was unable to proceed with plans to demolish and reconstruct a more efficient power generating facility, and the existing 44 year old plant will remain in operation until 2017, o The Ascon Landfill Site cannot be fully redeveloped until environmental remediation occurs A Remedial Action Plan is being developed and will be approved by California Department of Toxic Substances Control • Incompatible Uses The Ascon landfill and AES Facility have a negative effect on residential resale values in the immediate area • Impaired Investments Due to the presence of the Ascon landfill properties immediately surrounding the Landfill have suffered from lower property values The Agency developed twelve (12) goals to address these blighting conditions The Agency has been extremely active in remedying blighting conditions within the Project Area during the previous Five Year Implementation Plan, however, limited tax increment revenue generated within the Project Area has impacted the full implementation of such goals Goal 1: To assist with screening, design, or environmental improvements to mitigate impacts on adjoining neighborhoods and environmentally sensitive areas associated with modernization and reconstruction of the AES power generating plant • The Agency is working with AES to ensure that landscaping and painting upgrades to the site are accomplished • The landscaping and painting upgrades are expected to be completed by late 2008 • Agency financial assistance is not expected for this item 6 The Participant shall pay to the City the sum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) which may be used by the City in its sole discretion for such improvements as the City Council determines will improve the quality of life in the City of Huntington Beach. These funds shall be paid by Participant at such time as it elects after the closing of the Participant's construction financing for the Project but prior to Completion b. As a material part of the consideration for this Agreement, the Participant covenants and agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, and every successor in interest to the Site or any part thereof, 1. the Participant shall pay when due all real estate or possessory interest taxes and assessments assessed and levied on the Site or any portion thereof or any improvements thereon or any interest therein, and shall waive and refrain from making any appeal, challenge or contest of the validity of any tax assessment, encumbrance or lien on the Site, in part or in full, whether by property tax assessment appeal or otherwise; provided, however, that such waiver shall not apply until after the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued, and provided further that such waiver shall not apply to the extent that such assessment(or encumbrance or lien relating thereto) exceeds Two Hundred Million Dollars ($200,000,000);and 2. if the real estate or possessory interest taxes on the Participant's Interest in the Site in any fiscal year(July 1 through June 30) after the Certificate of Occupancy has been issued are less than Two Million Dollars($2,000,000),then on July 1 of the next fiscal year, the Participant shall pay to the City the difference between (i) the total real estate or possessory interest taxes paid by the Participant in such fiscal year and(h)Two Million Dollars($2,000,000) c In the event that by reason of any property tax exemption or otherwise the Site is not carried on the County Assessment Roll and/or real property taxes are not levied and collected on the Site for any reason, the Participant covenants for itself, its successors and assigns, and every successor in interest to the Site or any part thereof or any interest therein that the Participant shall pay to the Agency an amount equal to the product of the Site Tax Increment Revenue (as hereafter defined)payable to the Agency for the fiscal year immediately preceding the cessation of the levy or collection of taxes on the Site (the "Base Year Revenue Amount") multiplied by the number of years remaining in the term of this Agreement (or, if less, the number of years during which such exemption or cessation will continue to be applicable) At the option of the Participant, such payment shall be payable either(i)by a lump sum which shall be due within thirty (30)days after the occurrence of the event which has caused or will cause 10-2405/52143 17 AMENDED AND RESTATED OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (the "Agency") and POSEIDON RESOURCES (SURFSIDE) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company(the "Participant") The Agency and the Participant agree as follows: PART 1. SUBJECT OF AGREEMENT Section 101 Purpose of the Agreement The purpose of this Agreement is to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Project by providing for the development by the Participant of a seawater desalination facility(the "Facility"),on that certain real property described as the"Site" in Section 104 of this Agreement,below,as well as a water transmission line from the Site to an existing regional transmission system (the "Pipeline," collectively with the Facility, the "Project"). This Agreement does not grant any easement or permit or approve any development of the Project and does not contemplate or authorize any development of the Project beyond those entitlements and approvals listed in and subject to the conditions of Sections 108,202,207, 209,212,and 215 of this Agreement. All approvals,easements or permits necessary to construct and operate the Project must be granted independently of this Agreement by the entities with jurisdiction thereof. This Agreement is solely a finance mechanism to ensure the benefits of the Project that become due and payable under this Agreement accrue to the Agency and the City of Huntington Beach ("City"), and does not provide any entitlement to construct or operate the Project. The development of the Site and the Project pursuant to this Agreement, and the fulfillment generally of this Agreement are in the vital and best interests of the City and the health,safety and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable federal, state and local laws and requirements. In particular, this project will provide a reliable droughtwater supply along with the ability to obtain additional water supp incase of emergencies. Tie project prove e i access to a 10-million gallon ` water storage tank for emergency water supply to be constructed by the Participant at no co the City The project m partic ar wi prove e e gency the ability to TTEREW 9c-ture, d eT4- and fiord new affordable housing and create jobs through the property tax/m-lieu rop perry fees. z e tonal funds av e, a gency can partner with other property owners to rehabilitate and redevelop property for the public benefit of the Southeast Coastal Area. The Agency will be able to provide additional projects and services that will ' rove the health safety and welfare of its residents: a project will he improve sa ed access across intersections by constructing or reconstructing wheelchair ramps and will improve safety on the affected streets by replacing deteriorated pavement Section 102 The Redevelopment Plan This Agreement is subject to the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Coastal Redevelopment Project,which was approved and adopted on June 17,2002,by the City 10-2405/52143 1 Southeast Coastal Project Area Five Year Implementation Plan (2007-08 to 2011-12) 4 GOAL 1: To assist with screening, design, or environmental improvements to mitigate impacts on adjoining neighborhoods and environmentally sensitive areas associated with modernization and reconstruction of the AES power generating plant GOAL 2: To advance the cleanup of environmentally contaminated properties GOAL 3: To facilitate the reuse of other Project Area properties including the Edison and tank farm properties, by monitoring and assisting hazardous material cleanup activities and ensuring that any ultimate development is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and properties GOAL 4: To facilitate the protection and restoration of environmentally sensitive wetlands in connection with proposed redevelopment activities GOAL 5: To permit the Agency to assist with park and trail improvements if any Project Area properties are designated for such uses GOAL 6: Undertake public improvements in, and of benefit to, the project area, such as streets, flood control facilities, and other public facilities GOAL 7: To ensure that Project Area revenues are pledged to projects that directly benefit the area, and that the Project Area remains separate and distinct from the Agency's existing Huntington Beach Merged Redevelopment Project Area GOAL 8: To restrict the use of eminent domain to any non-fee ownership interests such as oil and gas leases GOAL 9: Eliminating blight and environmental deficiencies in the Project Area GOAL 10: Assembling of land into parcels suitable for modern, integrated development with improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation in the Project Area GOAL 11: Replanning, redesigning, and developing properties, which are stagnant or improperly utilized GOAL 12: Increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of housing affordable to very low, low and moderate income households Print Article ShuwuI}cWuoo Could seawater desalination come to Orange County? Page lof2 T��� ������ ��������/ /� p�� mE�RuFOR OF RtC !wSTER JOAN L FLyNN,CITY CLERK Shawn DeWane: Could seawater desalination come to Orange County? ~~ a� ~� ~� ^ Seawater desalination has been discussed aua potential large scale water source since the days ofAristotle This technology has proven zp itself effective over the past 2U years |n applications like nava| and cruise ships and m areas of the world where fresh water |escarce like Australia, Algeria and other countries The cost of importing water into Southern California has risen dramatically and will continue to rise for years tocome Currently, seawater desalination m more expensive than imported water But the application of new technologies has reduced the cost of ��----- desalination by more than half The water industry /a still waiting for the break-even point where desalinated water becomes less expensive than imported water That time /aapproaching More than a dozen desalination plants are scheduled to be operational along California's oouat|me over the next decade, including at least two /n Orange County Poseidon Resources, a private water infrastructure developer, has already broken ground in San Diego County on a 50-million-gallon-per-day (MGD) seawater desalination facility that is expected to be operational m about two years That company has been working for the past 1O years to develop asimilar desalination facility m Huntington Beach to service Orange County Poseidon's Huntington Beach project has every local permit approval and is now focused on securing the remaining state permits needed to start construction I have heard many of the project's detractors talk about Poseidon's effort to build a desalination facility in Tampa Bay They point to this 10-year old project as a fu/|ure, claiming that the project demonstrates that we should not trust Poseidon to build a similar desalination plant in Orange County I was recently in Tampa Bay on personal business and investigated this project for myself | toured the plant and talked tn the o#/o/o|a in charge My interest stems from my responsibility as an elected officer and the K4aaa Consolidated Water District's interest /n purchasing water from Poseidon's Huntington Beach project What | learned was eye-opening and in stark contrast to the perception created by Poseidon's critics In 1999, Tampa Bay Water selected Poseidon Resources after a competitive bid process to develop, construct and operate a25K4GD seawater deoa|/na1mnplant Construction began on schedule /n K8ay2O01. and then soon after the 9/11 terrorist attacks and related financial market collapse, the engineering and construction contractor involved in the project declared bankruptcy The project moved forward under Poseidon's management until May 2002 when Tampa Bay Water decided to exercise its right in the development agreement to buy out Poseidon prior to project completion As it was explained to me, Tampa Bay Water officials thought that they could avoid development risk and save money by assuming ownership and publicly financing the project When they exercised that right and bought Poseidon out, Tampa Bay Water engineers announced the project was on time (30 percent complete) and onbudget This history has been well documented /n newspaper reports and public records bdn//wwvv ocrcg/atczcooz/corunzon/noutcr/v|cvv pbp7db=ocreg/m|or&c/d=224363 4/7/2010 Print Article Shawn DeWane Could seawater desalination come to Orange County? Page 2 of 2 Tampa Bay Water does not claim Poseidon was to blame for the problems at the plant The problems at the plant could not be anticipated and now that Tampa had bought out Poseidon, they now owned the problems as well They also stated that Poseidon was never party to any litigation and was described as a good working partner For the water Industry and Poseidon this project provides a valuable history of lessons learned Public-private partnerships should work to shift risk to the private sector especially when public agencies have limited technical experience and scarce rate payer funded financing sources There are many Issues that must be resolved prior to our water agency's formal engagement with Poseidon, including the plant's water quality, cost and final permitting In this regard, Poseidon has a lot to prove Nonetheless, we should all dedicate ourselves to an honest discussion based on the facts In the end, factual evidence and sound science will decide the ultimate fate of Poseidon's Huntington Beach desalination project ©Copyright 2010 Freedom Communications All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy I UserAoreement I Site Map http //www ocregister com/common/printer/view php?db=ocregister&id=224363 9/7/2010 V S p b'Lj ERC C'i ' '°9E TING (Date) A� �UEL9C RECORD R C)E C!T(CLERK C{FIG Ct.ERK The Hon Cathy Green JOAN L FLU° Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members The availability of clean, reliable water is essential for California's future In Sacramento I see the challenges our state faces when it comes to water supply reliability Between the environmental restrictions and our agricultural needs, the availability of imported water from Northern California is becoming more challenging It is incumbent upon us in Orange County to develop new, reliable, drought-proof water supplies that are locally controlled The Huntington Beach Seawater Desalination Facility underwent extensive environmental review at the City in 2005 and now again in 2010 I'm pleased to learn that the changes to the way the project will function have "Less Than Significant" environmental impacts according to the scientists that conducted the studies This desalination facility will allow Orange County to be less reliant on imported water and will provide a new high-quality source of drinking water I encourage you and your fellow council members to certify the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) that will be before you this summer Sincerely, Tom Harman Senator 35`h District State of California cc Mayor Pro Tem Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchio Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devin Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen I II i A S P U 8 L C '�I E C 0 C/,-,r L I E �1 OF 2n D6i�- IT 11� c� I �CJr � - - - - - --- ICI--- - - - --- � - I ' I i I ' STATE CAPITOL COMMITTEES PO BOX 942849 VICE CHAIR,HOUSING AND SACRAMENTO,CA 94249-0073 AssrMh1v COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (9191 319-2021 ,/,�' fforuin �41 glisla furr APPROPRIATIONS FAX(916)319-2173 y�� �CY`�' BUDGET REVENUE AND TAXATION WEBSITE WWW ASSEMBLY CA GOWHARKEY z June 22, 2010 DIANE L. HARKEY ASSEMBLYWOMAN,SEVENTY-THIRD DISTRICT The Hon Cathy Green,Mayor City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mayor Green and Huntington Beach Council Members As the state representative and former mayor of Dana Point,which is the potential site of Orange County's second seawater desalination facility, I am familiar with how important this new water source would be to Orange County While the Dana Point desalination facility is still in its feasibility study stage, the project in Huntington Beach is much further along Due to the existing infrastructure for the water intake and outfall pipes,the Huntington Beach Seawater Desalmation Facility is economically viable and according to the City of Huntington Beach's Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR), it is environmentally practicable as well This project would provide Orange County with enough water to serve 300,000 residents It is fundamental for Orange County to take advantage of the resources that it has and be able to provide what water we can to our residents The project is designed to add to Southern California's portfolio of locally available water and help reduce our region's dependence on the imported water we receive from Northern California and the Colorado River which continues to become increasingly costly to ratepayers and more unreliable as a source as time moves on Additionally, because this project is privately financed and funded,the Orange County taxpayers will not be at risk and upon completion and operation,the City will receive millions of dollars in tax revenue from this project Please vote to certify the DSEIR and approve this water purification project Sincer , DIA L H RK an, rd District cc Mayor Pro Tern Jill Hardy Councilman Keith Bohr Councilman Joe Carchlo Councilman Gil Coerper Councilman Devm Dwyer Councilman Don Hansen ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE^29122 RANCHO VIEJO RD SUITE 111 >SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO,CA 92675^(949)347-7301-FAX(949)347-7302 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE.300 N COAST HWY o OCEANSIDE, CA 92054>(760)757-8084-FAX(760)757-8087 Printed on Recyrcleo Paper .'Poseidon seawater Dena linat� ,,Project in Huntingtoh. Bwa Drought proofing California in a Sustainable a`y s� Public a � mt Huntington Beach Vt Iv, Tuesday 7 Septert�a�r, g prn_ . " GaryC GIbbaiBusiness Hallna o • G D -:,;I it Engineering,C Eng;MIC ,C-P Eng, I y' cukNis rco.rc rknYox�.Nc / Water Resource Cost Trends: Us $/M3 5 Perth Seawater Desalination Plant Water Cost 0 g0$/m3 s —uesaunauon 4 Reuse Freshwater treatment Marginal water wIthdra—I Cost($/Ml) THE TRIPLE BOTTOM LIVE The TRUE value of water 2 Obtained with Minimal Environmental Impact The Environmental "Forgotten" 1 L195 2005 2015 2025 2035 Global Water Intelligence October20U6 Year • Water from the oceans is still perceived as a'technology'solution,but desalination should be recognised as a'policy'solution C P cllkNla�pFOPLk�Pk NY(1NN�NCt 1 Under the Surface B Ol1ENT8 PEOPLE HfflEOPY�NCE Gold Coast Desalination Plant-36 mgd (133 MLD) w Y x --�— - Courtesy of WateBecum NOR C { OLIENtS PEOPLEIFENEOPNANGE 2 Gold Coast Desalination Plant-36 mgd (133 MLD) . r � I ' Minimal Drum Screen Screenings(note the"Wheelie Bin") American Translation-Trash Can' Courte yof WaterSecure `S.� CLIEtITB PfOPLE PEPtOPN�NCf Mass Balance — 300 lbs of "sea life" 99 % algae sacrificed to provide water for 500 000 people? Environmental D—., A L S CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS ..a ®tOlN6N ro � .ram-awyte.®ai .wemwe�pYrinomn ,. •waMww �l _ A� ru�m�-��i�� rr atvue 4�++rota W euou agnp e�w eufeTe PEaPLe'PEnroxrr,wcE 3 Why SWRO is Sustainable & the Future Solution 1 SWRO reflects the"t I;eruahmmarl valve oS water",the"triple bottom line"as environmental,social and financial costs are all included in the unit cost of water No conventional source adequately caters for environmental costs 2 SWRO is drought free and provides a totally new(original)source,contrary to recycling 3 SWRO does not disturb rivers,estuaries,delta's,the sea and associated habitat (fish,siltation,stagnation and in-stream flows) Dams result in the sea getting saltier in confined gulfs e g Arabian Gulf Even semi—confined Cockburn Sound in Perth has not shown any signs of salinity increase after 3 years of operation(DB09-278 Perth,Australia Two-year Feed Back on Operation and Environmental Impact) 4 SWRO does not disturb aquifers and associated habitat(water table,seawater intrusion,springs,acid sulphate sods and stygofauna) 5 SWRO brine discharges and residuals can be environmentally managed(this has been proven beyond any doubt in Perth(DB09-278) 6 SWRO is efficient and becoming more efficient with constant advances Why SWRO is Sustainable & the Future Solution 7 SWRO submerged intakes adequately designed,entrain negligible algae,zooplankton and no fish Entrainment of sea life is minimal with well designed submerged open intakes with low velocity Only some algae and zooplankton(and no fish)in minuscule quantities are entrained Proven by Perth and Gold Coast Desalination Plants 8 SWRO can use wind or any renewable energy to ensure no emissions 9 SWRO has the smallest environmental and terrestrial footprint of any source(Perth 16 acres Land+6 acres Sea+wind farm 12 mdes2 for 17%of the city's water) 10 SWRO can be located near to where it is needed 11 SWRO need not utilise long pipelines/canals(no need for millions of tons of steel, cement or massive excavations—such as required when"bringing water down from the north"and using 4 5 times less energy) 12 SWRO results in minimal greenhouse gas production during the manufacture of components 13 SWRO results in minimal greenhouse gas production during the construction of the plant t > CLIENIS PEOPLE IPENFOHYANCE 4 Why SWRO is Sustainable & the Future Solution 14 r The deployment of SWRO plants on coasts ensures that there is a water catchment plan in place(for water quality purposes),ensuring the highest degree of ocean protection 15 SWRO results in zero evaporation,siltation or salt build-up in dams(e g Wellington Dam,WA) 16 SWRO water quality is not affected by bush fires,first rain or activities in catchments which can affect water quality and future run-off(e g Melbourne) 17 SWRO could ultimately be partially powered by osmotic power(a new form of renewable energy) Locate SWRO Plants adjacent to WWT Plants 18 SWRO can utilise greenhouse off—sets from renewable energy development from anywhere in the world,after all climate change is a global issue 19 SWRO can be provided at Zvm= full capacity within two years of environmental clearances being obtained 20 The future development potential of SWRO is still amazing(especially membranes, materials,control systems and logic and energy reduction) MR P D Gl1ENT8 PEbPLEiPENFONM�NGF ^-� mm^� { t �'C�72��J`lC3c'h�£I(�f��,ratii�ti7t�`J��� %fl;rn 1, `twne�a_, 5 r c+ �In Ti let lrt Ilwnu tin U'�n bnEPN riot 1115"In 5prt an,shv�,lli❑34h ntNk'!EI Lain iioliio((.cdiwd Why being a greenie makes you a meanie.. r Yra�ik Fiat e.� r^rr.ar re nrr en u PvaF^LXarn Y Y�•-,•hen ^r - �'aY�nbr arw Gnu .c u}Inl~u�mr �ltERl — arc �:.rvXrvppI rcn 1pgM��rne nnv „ a• n r 4^I{•ra n4raJ1 u o»i�xmlu� T ri rirr CIIFHTB PEOPLE P �w�n.Nmi fehp�^tr--- ~h'erL�^asrkna�^� xw 6 • • A B RP • • r, _� � „�„� � Ifs��✓U ». �y r > `it''µ Y.r•.+_�%,._Y _ ? W�I _ 1 r flu � �n#ingtonBe�a�ch Des�alin�atio� Plant �x Plant/Design ��``:; A roved i'n 2005 �, r pp 1 R r a ���Hu�n+tin ton�Beach Des{alinat�FonP°la`�rit�,���. �.:�...>.,f m_ �., -.-.•�� a :..�_..-. :• _ .. ,. ,. . . , Reconfigured 501 Flow Schematic 0 C E A N Reusing exrsting industrial fac:ilities" � .0 •� 1 t w (Partnering Cities IWater Agencies 1 *' AGENCY ACRE FEET, h �' EI Toro�lNater District, �: � �� = 3,000 F Irvme Ranch Water,District -6,000 Laguna,BeachSCounty.Water;Distrct : 1;OQ0 ,,° ,+� � Moulton;Nlguel Watei.District 4,000 Santa Margarita'Water-District 5,000 out Goast.Water District ` 3,000 , Trabucoi Canyon Water,District 750. <. ^Golden State.Water Company 5,000. ` City of4 ewport Beach-• E 000 . . r ;City of Fullerton 2,500 - ^G ty of Santa Ana 3,000 :City of Huritington Beacii 3,360 t +CIYyof Fountain Valley 2 500 CityofGardenGrove r i City of Seal Beach � � E50 Municipal Water District of OC 20,000(RESERVED) Total F`inancial' Benefit to HB.' W, f p, :,. O Water Enterprise Fund■Infrastructure Funds m.Agency Funds- OG.eneral Fund r. $14,922,009 �. $48 000 000 � $40,575,411 City Financia� Protectios a ,Su;rety:bond for�pJan ��& pipeline constructions "Most favSO- ored; nation status" for franchise agreement F $ y Easfement oven water tank site,property x ®0-i t® puirchYas�e water t5ank``site`f®i- $1 F Public Support The Cityof Aliso Viejo Io The Orange County League of Cities The City of Buena Park Every State Legislator in the Orange County The City of Dana Point delegation The City of Laguna Hills The Orrange Gou Board of Supervisors;The City of Laguna Niguel Th Orang_ nt, Business Council'(OCBC) T�,he Git.of Lagu�na,W ods" ThE`Orange County Taxpayers Association(OC"Tax) The City ofiL•a Palrna` The LA-OC Building&Construction Trades Council The City of Mission Viejo Eight local chambers,of commerce The City of Orange Partial Supportei-List Only The City of Placentia The City of Rancho.Santa Margarita The City of San Juan Capistrano The City of Stanton The City of Tustin The City of Villa Park The City of Yorba Linda -"Constr., -tion Commenced t= ,. Novem64;=200.9 $ x. - x „ ..N . )ZI �I fir% f �_ It 1 Notice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact Report NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Plan Amendment NO. 10 — 001/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 (Seawater Desalination Project) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 012HI6209932 Office of the City Clerk $(00.4� 14 P.O. Box 190, 00 Huntington Beach, CA92648 0� 09/08/2010 Mailed From 926 A,2 LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING US POSTAGE ID:470 AM Resident 21851 Newlan, RETOPM TO SE."N"DER VACAIN� Huntington Be 'ro �ofzmr;pzo mc HCUHLI i Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Clerk .0 P.O. Box 190 00 r 0 A 0 08,26/20IG Huntington Beach, CA 92648 tu Ma6ed From 92648 RE: US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Christine Smith Or Current Resident -21851 Newland St Sr)c 153 A''Huntington Beach, PETUrIN TO SF---r4rjE7JR VA6ANT U14AMLIZ TO FOMtARD i Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach m o�2� e2�: °,Office of the City Clerk O `� P.O. Box 190 00 � $00 p' O set os ,ac�o Lr Huntington Beach, CA 92648 m O S POSTAGE CL Win, LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING cc c E N -0 N APN: 114-150-72 Christopher Nielsen N e Or Current Resident 851 Newland St S """ > . Q N 21 c p C Huntington Beach,CA f NXXX: 927 CAE 1 00 08d zl.�l o LU RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD me s 92640019090 *20 7 7- 07223--31-20. E � o a) 'E B-I �0- Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk 012H1620,90332 O Cfwn City of Huntington Beach C N Office of the City Clerk �,.. (U P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach CA 92648 t� €5 5 2 _ Maded From 9264 B POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE — PUBLIC HEARING O ®` Z � �%T; 142 APN: 148-086-10 U O 0) v Michael Ogan j N O e 21371 Seaforth Ln Z Q� O CL Huntington Beach, CA ➢ OTIFY SENDER OF NEW ADDRESS OGAN 4e4 t-.SAKE PARK AVE # 374 MC: 946:6CA.'"'i.7!Z3004 Notice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact �n, City Clerk . y 4.�� 012H 6209932 ington BeachReport NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Plan x --NO- 1 . ie City Clerk - _ V ;ox 190 001/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 ( a Il�ati ;�����10 ;ach, CA 926 Project) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 a- Mailed AGE - POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 501 APN: 148-121-18 Nuboard Recycling Inc e 1755 Park Ave Laguna Beach,CA 92651_991a F 1;CIE 92 LAC 1 aO 09'?001 10 RETURN 70 SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNAML.E TO FORWARD G26�11£j3t019090 }&l]2377—t3SO74—fl'-3j-16 �r3Cj ;bli} dl} l}3}I}1}!!}S31i}J11}I}11)}T}i3S#33t!3}��}}} } }71!}7333�S�S n, City Clerk igton Beach City Clerk ` ach, CA 92648 � ` :' W-Le W US POSTAGE. LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING:: - - ID: 526 APN: 114-150-75 Cannery Hamilton Properties Llc 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd San Ramon, CA 94583-2324 (2 , L r ^ ,A A n RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD £:O: +�i2j£sj#f�jjL7����Cr 1J)jJJJ1)JJJ1)JJJIJJjIJJ1J Ili JJJJJ11JJ1JJ71JJJIJIJJI)JJJJJ)J} e City Clerk UlIA - ox 190 ,V — ach, CA 92648 LU 0 ;°2 ,' 0�0 MIX }r Mailed Fr(>m 92648 S POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 258 Huntington Beach, C Notice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environmental Impacty nn, City Clerk �r a' 209a2 tnngton BeachReport NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Pla n NO. 1 ie City Clerk J �� 00.4 3ox 190 001/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 (d a � s � Il atim/2612010 :ach, CA926�rojeC#) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 IL lz� 1Y�_ hailed Fs�tta26ss E: US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARIN7: - s ID:507 APN: Resident 8641 Edison Ave Huntington Be' 009AR_17A9 N2_xzE 927 DE: 1 ae O�Jia4J�0 RETURN TO SENDER UNDELIVERAELE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD *2077-04124-04J-20 '�=sus 1? �. 11)Illlllll)Ilil1176113Ilillli ititlllllillllillll))lltilllltll in, City Clerk _12h ---- ington Beach :tea rl � ie City Clerk �_ ,. 1 lox 190 3ach, CA 92648 0 ;`2 r201 ww � Mailed From 92648 US POSTAGE � e LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARTwt5%EFw .00%Erft% ri UO LJ ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Occupant 21871 Newland St nfr Huntington Beach RETURN TO SENDER REFUSED UNAGLE TO FORWARD BC: s2s4aolsos0 *2077-000 85--02-24 j )1!1))IMI)IIII)1)lll)ll)111)t,))JIM)llllllid)JbIll)1111 e City Clerk "-' 00 m ox 190 �t- e+ 08/261 2G10 ach, CA 92648 w w Mailed From 92648 CL E: US POSTAGE s,F LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARIN& _Y _ ID: 46 APN: 148-043-38 Patricia Marshall 0 . 8441 Doncaster Dr Huntington Beach, ( A g9RAR-RM-1 in, City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact a ington BeachPeport NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Platt. O. 10ie City Clerk I- lox 190 001ITentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 ( iati 26;2410 ;ach, CA 926 rOject) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 W.WMailed From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident ® 21851 Newland St Spc 230 Huntington Be. - NIXIE 927 OF- 1 00 00131Y 10: RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD r�,� y Ec:j 92f:490:19090 *207ii7- `C}(7221-31-a ��a --ZQ\� iss 'i 9C! I1} liiFll11IIF3F1lFIIl11FIli;iFi}I}I}j}FlIFF illli}I FYYiiIY�� ,nn, City Clerk KV .tnngton Beach he City Clerk L- � - .� :� f i i 1 Box 190 each, CA 92648 _ maiied From, 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident �- ---21851 Newland St Spc 239 Huntington Bea( . -- -All7G)G NIXIE 9-217 DE 1 00 00131110 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD MC: 926 j4001jS090 *20 7]r-0}72 32:2- ]31-26 ����,���=I��¢K��L� IIFIi3IFlllilFF?i!i}��?}lill2}}i}i���}�}}�)FFi�i lFtl}7FFFFFiI) ie City Clerk n k .� ' k j s lox 190 iach, CA 92648 �' �at2 i ° Mailed From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ ID: 37 APN: 148-044-25 James Thies ® 8563 Amazon River Cir Fountain Valk -" ----" rr" Notice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact nn, City Clerk 612LI6209932 tington BeacReport NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Play -NO. 1 ie City Clerk 3ox 190 001/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 (Na lihati&9 0 A, cc 11I.- M 08/2612010 E)ach, CA 926 LU(A cc Project) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # te 4 mailed From 92648 COL_ US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Lod Montez Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 220 Huntington Be I t4 X ME 927 DE 1 s o 06131110 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNAMLE TO FORWARD ac: 92640019090 -*2077-07214-31-29 in, City Clerk ------ ington Beach e City Clerk Aw M fq - -ox 190 6 812 6:-'-'?0 10 iach, CA 92648 0 Wit Mailed From 92648 M US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING 0:467 APN: 114-150-53 Resident 21752 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 14a Huntington Beach, NIXIE: 927 OC 1 00 06Y.Z1110 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 92649019090 -*2077-07210-a1-29 00.4 3ox 190 tu C188/2612010 each, CA 92648 m�art W-It Mailed From 92648 U POtTAGE LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 227 Huntington Beach, (" "CAr, 7rlr Notice of Public Fearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact in, City Clerk iji 141�2C7Cd :ington BeachReport NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Plan .NO. 1 d._— w_.�wvv_ 3OCity Clerk 001/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 (� a 4 �� Ke ati � �.4 1 Var aa& 126;20 0 :ach, cA926Project) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 a Mailed From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING A _ ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 147 ' Huntington Beach,i . NIXIE 927 OF- 1 00 t�l3��iI10 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABL.E TO FORWARD Li r� 9c:{ 92649019090 -*2077-0 211-31-20 x����-Y�l:,y� `2d�Q !�#1223#�31#!I##212311##13�13##33t 11�2132�1##3�1�3331#21##�311 ,nn, City Clerk ; - tington Beach .� � ;�~a�~°`--='mom°-'xi Z4 he City ClerkIlk Box 190 l each, CA 92648 W re 1z a¢'eat From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Denise Marino ® Or Current Resident ' 21851 Newland St Spam 14A Huntington Beach,Cj NIX=F 9*27 DE 1 00 0113✓31/10 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT -UNABLE TO FORWARD SC: 92640j019090 i*1 077-07212-31-20 WWRMQ� 44wov34b0 ll#12313121#112#i1F111111711132I21111213i11#33131##�133###�il� \AIL 1i2C1R - :)x 190 9) UP 1- . 98,26''2010 3ch, CA 92648 ou to W W Mailed From 92648 us POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING o . ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ® Jorge Festini Or Current Resident 21851 Ne, �� Notice of Public Hearing.— Subsequent Environmental Impact nn, City Clerk # 12H162099 2 tington BeacReport NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Plar NO 1 d -,v���u_« ie City Clerk 3ox 190 001/-Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 (tea Ii ati tea i-= } ,'2612010 each, ca92*oject) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 a W _° hianed From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Yoko Harada dO Current Resident 2-851 Newland St Spc 117 Huntington Beach, CA a')rAG RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD BC; t92 i646t 01 SO90 *20'77-072C?c-t-a I-28 �f�h'+•.s�('1��6�.�fl ��}!}}}}d}I}!la}}�}}II}}�}II}}}}}}III}I}}II}}3�}I}}II}F}}})}I1 ,nn, City Clerk _ ,tington Beach he City Clerk s - � y� Box 190 each, CA 92648 Asa W._ n Mailed From. 2648 5 a. US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING 0 ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 124 Huntington Beact ^" nnrAG 7G70 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD y BC: 92 4 019090 j Ak J2o77-rs7209- j j1-29 - "ZV-,.RG.r.. �:ffiL+� 3Q IIFI}!2}i31}' !!! }}} }} }71}!}lltllll�!}►li!!I!I}yll}!!i}!!Il ie City Clerk UJ -$ Sox 190 0 ;ach, CA 92648 IL W-- 68 �W W hailed From 92648 `` US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Peter Nisson Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 141 Huntington Beach, C _ _ Notice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact nn, City Clerk �2 „099-3, tington BeacReport NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Plan ENO.NO. 1 d-=- ie City Clerk �-' I O a °1 3ox 190 001/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 ( ea al ati F fi .ach, cA926Project) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4� a I a � � ���� Mailed From 926 ss. e S POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Max Stimac e Or Current Resident 21851 Newland Rt c.,r ao Hunti NIXIE 927 DE 1 00 09131/10 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT Ulr-A6LE TO FORWARD ac: 92S49019090 *2077-072OZ--31-26 "Gp-.c C1 AdL;'L-'�a It 0 11J IF}}IIIIIII til}1I1i}�i113l in, City Clerk ington Beach a = -:------ ie City Clerk -�A g . 4 Sox 190 n r4 - b _ fig �_ ;ach, CA 92648 R' 226 `�`'0 t � : Xat R: He€t From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 0 . Mary Moses Or Current Resident 21851 Nei ta:E-A3:F- 927 DE 1 00 081-S1110 Huntingtor RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNADLE TO FORWARD Li SC: 92849019090` ] *2077-07206-.31-23 e City Clerk UU.4 11 ox 190 0 1 08126'2010 ach, CA 92648 IU w w_ Mailed From 92648 I-U - SUS POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 109 Huntington Beact Notice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact nn, City Clerk tington BeaclRe ort NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Plar 6'2 ' �' 3-2 he City Clerk -e%¢ Box 190 001/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 ( � lidati each, CA 92 Ca F 2612010 oject) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 re 0: Mailed From 92648 LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING US POSTAGE ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 e Resident �51 Newland St Spc 46 Huntington Beach NIXIE 927 pE i ryp ��s131 1 i(3 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD 4� SC: 921549019090 -*207'J7-07229- 31-28 E•lf�C'''C.<��?�?g���t) 11l13FFII11l113F31i111Fililli333F31.111Ii3133}1131}3113F3331311 in, City Clerk ngton Beach - � "� Nff e City Clerk �`a _- 1 , ox 190 ach, CA 92648 maiici From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING o 11):470 APN: 114-150-72 e Resident a 21851 Newland St Spc 306 Huntington Beach,CP NIXIE 927 OF- i 00 0tz/:B1j 1O RETURN TO SENDER VACANT NASLE TO FORWARD MC: j92S49039090 *2077-07200-- r31-28 wav-'.:Zlc�� £+ f� IIFIFiiFIFIF113131F311111l113F33F3111}13111Fi31}1111111111111] e t;ity(;lerk a4C10.41 ox 190 U. ach, CA 92648 W CO "s'26!2 01 1-W Mailed From 92648 a 9: US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 310 Huntington Bea ° — ""r"c 'a"' Notice of Public bearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact (nn, City Cle 129H e2t 9932 ltington Beac eport NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Plan,`, O. 10v `v ��YT he City C Box 190 Ier VO1/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 ( d W Ali ti . sty r11- a 08 2612010 each, CA 92Pfoject) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 _ Mailed From 92648 a Us POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING e ` _ tD: 470 APN: 114450-72 Suzanne Sephton Or Current Resident 21851 Newianti St soc 228 Huntington e NIXIE 927 OE 1 00 0611-t1119 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD SE:]] s2S4]901j909tjj7 *2077-07220- y31-20 K4"��.C't��51�C? (lF�F}3FIF1FI�FFFIFF��IStF�lF}!IF}l�lllllllFiilll}}IIF7FFFSFI� mn, City Clerk --- 2 u ltington Beach �_ he City Clerk ZZ ° Box 190 � each, CA 92648 , 2 ?i'`: w a€led From 9264 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID:467 APN: 114-150-53 a Resident 21752 Pacific Cc—, Huntington Beac NIXIE 927 DE 1 90 00/Z1110 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD Cc:} J926 j49019090 *2077-072'j25- i31-26 ���r''4�f-}'��� �� IlF1FlF2�311��FFF�Si113F111�F}iFF21�IIIFIIIFF1�7�31�1Ii3FFlF3� lox 190 s 08126,12019 .ach, CA 92648 cal CG w Mailed From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Louis Amerman Or Clirrant Reorient Notice of Public Hearing - Subsequent Environmental Impact �n, City Clerk 1�� 6�ru�d:ington BeacReport NO. 10 - 001 and Entitlement Plar is NO. 1{ - ry �v`A ie City Clerkn lox 190 001/Tentative Parcel Nlap NO. 10 - 130 ( lAati2612010 :ach, cA 926 UJ roject) - 9-7-10 - Agenda Item # 4 l�9 Mailed From' 92648 ° US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 ® Jan Torrence ` or Currant Rocirlont 21851 NIXIE 927 OE 1 00 08131.110 Huntir RETURN TO SENDER VACANT LIVABLE TO FORWARD E3C: 92 ib j$F3DO19 j090 *2077- 072 30-31-29 -_-_.._.-__. nn, City Clerk tington Beach } to 1e City Clerk - - r pa i A14 3ox190 use;s=2• `�-�. E)ach, CA 92648 Mailed From S POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Iy Abajian or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 23 Huntington Beach,C" -7W), MIME: 927 DE 1 Oil OBIZ1110 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE To FORWARD SC: 92S49019090 *-207 7-072 31--31-20 "zv--z� *0 #!F4}F}II}1F1 F}F1}}11F}1}II}}}}}}111}1F}1l}}} }I}}II}}}F}#}11 ox 190 U AP res s-- M 98126i 201}0 ach, CA 92648 Ui W W It Mailed From 92648 lL E Non US POSTAGE oa_ LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING a� e ID: 287 APN: 149-031-10 Lynn Davis Bekki 9022 Regatta Dr ® Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7843 a}-rv-rr ca�a-� na t t,n nq 1 4t l 9 r1 nn, City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact tington BeactReport NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Plare. -m 019H!C-209932 Q. -ie City Clerk U.414 3ox 190 001/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 IiVtio 2612010 each, CA 92 ed From 92648 Wroject) 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 CL Mail US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident =--21 851 Newland St Spc 41 Huntington Beach, CA COAAP-MA V411KIE 927 DE 1 00 08j31l10 RETURN TO SENDER VAC-ANT UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 92640019090 *2077-0721-5-01-20 nn, City Clerk tington Beach fW ie City Clerk R 14 30X 190 v 1 @— I.- : :-' 6 2 01 �ach, CA 92648 LU M W — us 2 mailed From. -92648 M, US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING JD:470 APN: 114-150-72 sident 21851 Newland St Spc 17 Huntington Beach,CA 9217 0E- 1 00 08131110 RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD sc: 92649019090 -*2077-07217-31-29 1 AV6 P-Z*0's a C,e&V ia 0 $ e City Clerk UUA ,ox 190 -U 08112612010 -ach, CA 92648 lu W W. ¢ Mailed From 92648 CL US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 140 Huntington Bea, nn, city cle,Notice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact ort NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement PI i 106- � tington Beac[Re -ie City Clerk p �- N® 1 �+jY�h 3ox 190 001/Tentative Parcel Flap NO. 10 — 130 a atnnati � �- each, CA92 W 26/2Ct1dt p w roject) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 W cc Mailed From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING aJD.- 313 APN: 114481-01 1V Terence Boston 3501 Jamboree Rd#301 Newport Beach, CA 9 -- HIX iE 927 DE 1 00 OGJ 29.110 RMTQRN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT XNOWN UNAOL-E TO FORWARD ♦,.tom ea,g��, � MC:( 92649019090j i1 K�j�-�•���!G!>+�'ci.�vs.a��Q llilllJllillllJi71111)171i�1131i 1711111111�111111i 1�lilii1D11! in, City Clerk :ington Beach ie City Clerk ° { _ Sox 190 U, g, r: 1 , each, CA 92648 ra � 08,26 12 ;tail-IL rows 926 US POSTAGF LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 81 AP 1 -081-07 wayn . ewis 8 Sandy Hook Dr untington N jxz 27 DE I Do 08Y30110 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNADLE TO FORWARD y SC: j92640019090 *2077-0:32j95-:30-29 E+Wiift"1lipt IIJIJiillilllhill)1111117111JiiJJlllJ)iJl�/)1111il11 117i11i11 e City Clerk O a 1 • -_ ;ox 190 ra 9 t26,201 .ach, CA 92648 W_OC Mailed From 92648 Q.a, US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Stacey Lavoie Or Current Resident 21851 New'-4 O�0-^A nn, City ClerlNotice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environ -Impact4,„��, tington Beac 3� -ie City Clerk"Report NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Plan �L,00.4 3ach ox 0 9269p1/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 a a� ation26 2010 MaHed From Project) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item ## 4 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID:470 APN: 114-150-72 e . Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 59 __...- ._. Huntington Be_.. 927 DE 00. ry0 0 0 J JJ RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNAML-E TO FORWARD -OC i;j 9.2640019090{ j t j*2{17 i7 t.6SOS 2S Z9 so 11tI11t11711117111i1111)1i1111t7t]li�fill�l3)7 1I17I173F1i�1�1 nn, City Clerk tington Beach es 012H1620099-39 ie City Clerk 3ox 190 _ each, CA 92648 ' 0812612010 W Mailed From 92648 IL iz US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING m� ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Mary Grisham Or Current Resident Hur RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNAOLE TO FORWARD 92>✓40019090 *2177- OSS-37 29 29 �.����?� �.�^`3 �o II,Itttt{Fltli,ttl„1{FIltl�tttFt,Ili]{Frl{tFtltlF111tFFtFltii �e City 30x 190 Jerk N �= $ i�� each, CA 92648 a 0812612010 M� Mailed From 92648 US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARIN(; s ID: 483 APN: 148-011-07 _ Mills Land &Water Co 21471 Newland St ® Huntington Beach, CA 92646-7642 nn, City CNotice of Public Hearing — Subsequent Environmental Impact ler tington Be=Report NO. 10 — 001 and Entitlement Plan ANO. 10YLU6-'09932 ie City Clerk 001/Tentative Parcel Map NO. 10 — 130 (g ais. al.&600'- 1:ach, CA 926 �� � t38t2st2t310 project) — 9-7-10 — Agenda Item # 4 Ix ccMailed From 92648 a� US POSTAGE LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ID: 470 APN: 114-150-72 Krystalyn Franks Or Current Resident 21851 Newland St Spc 271 Huntington Beach,CA 92646-7638 — — - NIX= 9227 DE I C7D DEs/�1lICa RETURN TO SENDER VACANT UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 92848019090 -*2077— 7225-33-29 111111111111 III 1 till 11111111111111111111111211111)i11111111111 i