Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Huntington Beach Senior Center - Public Hearing Adopt Resolu
CLAREMON-IF LAND GROUP Attorneys Mark C. Allen III 250 West First Street, Suite 330 21312 H!AV 21 25 mallen@ClaremontUndC,roup.com Claremont, CA 91711 (909) 354-8825 Fax (909) 398-1883 G.0 0 8 May 17, 2012 VIA FACSIMILE& FIRST CLASS MAIL (714) 374-1557 Joan L. Flynn Office of the City Clerk CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION SENIOR CENTER PROJECT ("PROJECT") Notice is hereby given that under Section 21167.5 of the California Public Resources Code, Petitioners, Parks Legal Defense Fund and Larry Geisse (collectively, "PL_DE'.),.a non-profit organization, intends to file a petition under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act against k6sp.1 Respondents, ndents, The City of Huntington Beach and Huntington Beach City Counc*il ("Huntington Beach"), challenging its certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") and approval of a project known as Huntington Beach Senior Center on April 16, 2012. The City's adoption of the EIR and approval of the Project was improper under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), because of its failure to adequately analyze all of the Project's significant impacts on the environment and for its failure to properly mitigate the Project's significant impacts to a less than significant level; and on the grounds that the approval violated the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code § 21000 et seq.). The action may also challenge your agency's approval of the project based on one or more violations of other laws. Very truly yours, CLAREMONT LAND GROUP 0 o GERALYN L. SKAPIK Attorneys for PARKS LEGAL DEFENSE FUND and LARRY GEISSE' GLS:mr 1:\ENVIRON\CLG,008(Parks Legal Def)\plead\Noti ce of Intent to File CEQA Petition(5-17-12).doe City ®f Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street ® Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 ® www.huntingtonbeachca.gov Office of the City Clem 71 1999 , ` Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk NOTICE OF ACTION April 19, 2012 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach CA 92648 Subject: Adopt Resolution No. 2012-18 approving the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) No. 07-002; Adopt Resolution No. 2012-19 approving General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 11-004 and approve Conditional Use Permit(CUP) No. 07-039(R)for the Huntington Beach Senior Center Applicant: City of Huntington, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Location: 18041 Goldenwest Street(5-acre site southwest of the intersection of Goldenwest Street/Talbert Avenue in Central Park) On Monday, April 16, 2012, the Huntington Beach City Council held a public hearing to consider an appeal filed by Council Member Connie Boardman of the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R) and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(EIR) No. 07- 002 for the Huntington Beach Senior Center project. The City Council voted to uphold the Planning Commission's recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 2012-18 approving the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR) No. 07-002; Adopt Resolution No. 2012-19 approving General Plan Amendment(GPA) No. 11-004 and approve Conditional Use Permit(CUP) No. 07-039(R) for the Huntington Beach Senior Center. Attached are copies of Resolution Nos. 2012-18 and 2012-19, Findings and Conditions for Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R), the Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a copy of page 7 of the April 16, 2012 City Council Action Agenda. If you have any questions, please contact Jennifer Villasenor, Senior Planner, at (714) 374-1661, or the Planning Department Zoning Counter at(714) 536-5271. rely, J L. Flynn,io City Clerk JF:r1 c: Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building Jennifer Villasenor, Senior Planner Attachments: Copies of Resolution No. 2012-18 and Resolution No. 2012-19 Findings and Conditions for Approval for CUP 07-039(R) Finding of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Page 7 of the April 16, City Council Action Agenda Sister Cities: Anjo,Japan ® Waitakere,New Zealand RESOLUTION NO. 2012-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(SCH42007041027)FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER PROJECT WHEREAS, Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002, State Clearinghouse #2007041027, ("SEIR") was prepared by the City of Huntington Beach ("City") in response to Parks Legal Defense Fund, et al. v. City of Huntington Beach, et al. to address the environmental implications of the proposed Huntington Beach Senior Center Project(the"Project"). ® On April 2, 2007, a Notice of Preparation/Initial Study for the Project was prepared and distributed to the State Clearinghouse, other responsible agencies, trustee agencies and interested parties. m After obtaining comments received in response to the Notice of Preparation, and comments received at the public scoping meeting held on April 19, 2007, the City completed preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") and filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse on September 13, 2007. ® The Draft EIR was certified by the City Council on February 4, 2008. ® Pursuant to the court requirement that the original certification of the EIR be set aside, a Draft Subsequent EIR was completed and circulated for public review and comment from September 15, 2011 to October 31, 2011 and was available for review at several locations including City Hall, the Huntington Beach Central Library, and the City's website; and Public comments have been received on the Draft Subsequent EIR, and responses to those comments have been prepared and provided to the City Council as a section within a separately bound document entitled "Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Huntington Beach Senior Center" (the"Responses to Comments"), dated December 2011; and The Public Resources Code 21092.5(a) requires that the City of Huntington Beach provide a written proposed response to any public agency that commented on the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, and the Response to Comments included in the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report satisfies this provision; and The City Council held a public meeting on the Subsequent EIR on April 16, 2012, and received and considered public testimony. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1 12-3275.001/78547 Resolution No. 2012-18 1. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15132 and Section 15162, the Final Subsequent EIR for the Project is comprised of the Draft Subsequent EIR and Appendices, the comments received on the Draft Subsequent EIR, the Responses to Comments (including a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft Subsequent EIR), the Text Changes to the Draft Subsequent EIR (bound together with the Responses to Comments) and all Planning and Building Department Staff Reports to the Planning Commission and City Council, including all minutes, transcripts, attachments and references. All of the above information has been and will be on file with the City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Building, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. 2. The City Council finds and certifies that the Final Subsequent EIR is complete and adequate in that it has identified all significant environmental effects of the Project and that there are no known potential environmental impacts not addressed in the Final Subsequent EIR. 3. The City Council finds that although the Final Subsequent EIR identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the Project is approved, all significant effects which can feasibly be mitigated or avoided have been mitigated or avoided by the incorporation of Project design features, standard conditions and requirements, and by the imposition of mitigation measures on the approved Project. 4. The City Council finds that the Final Subsequent EIR has described reasonable alternatives to the Project that could feasibly obtain the basic objectives of the Project (including the "No Project" Alternative), even when these alternatives might impede the attainment of Project objectives and might be more costly. Further, the City Council finds that a good faith effort was made to incorporate alternatives in the preparation of the Draft Subsequent EIR and that a reasonable range of alternatives was considered in the review process of the Final Subsequent EIR and ultimate decisions on the Project. 5. The City Council finds that no "substantial evidence" (as that term is defined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15384) has been presented which would call into question the facts and conclusions in the Subsequent EIR. -- 6. The City Council finds that no "significant new information" (as that term is defined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5) has been added to the Subsequent EIR after circulation of the Draft Subsequent EIR.. The City Council finds that the minor refinements that have been made in the Project as a result of clarifications in the text of the Draft Subsequent EIR do not amount to significant new information concerning the Project,nor has any significant new 'information concerning the Project become known to the City Council through the public hearings held on the Project, or through the comments on the Draft Subsequent EIR and Responses to Comments. 7. The City Council finds that the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program establishes a mechanism and procedures for implementing and verifying the mitigation measures pursuant to Public Resources Code 21081.6 and hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the Project prior to or concurrent with Project implementation as defined in each mitigation measure. 12-3275.001/78547 2 Resolution No. 2012-18 8. The City Council finds that the Final Subsequent EIR reflects the independent review and judgment of the City of Huntington Beach City Council, that the Final Subsequent EIR was presented to the City Council, and that the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final Subsequent EIR prior to approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R). 9. The City Council finds that the Final Subsequent EIR serves as adequate and appropriate environmental documentation for the Project. The City Council certifies that the Final Subsequent EIR prepared for the Project is complete, and that it has been prepared to respond to the California Court of Appeals ruling, dated December 13, 2010 and in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and CEQA Guidelines. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16t:h day of P,pri 1 , 201 2 Mayor REVE DAPPROVED: PROVED: �'�Inager Director of Planning and Building APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7CL City Alto ey 12-3275.001/78547 3 Res. No. 2012-18 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on April 16, 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr NOES: Shaw, Boardman ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None jiV lerk and ex-officio Jerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California RESOLUTION NO. 201 -1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-004 (SENIOR CENTER PROJECT) WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 proposes to amend the Recreation and Community Services Element of the City's General Plan to re-designate the 5-acre senior center site as a high intensity recreation area on the Central Park Master Plan of Uses and incorporate the Central Park Master Plan of Uses into the Recreation and Community Services Element as Figure RCS-2. The amendment also includes modifying teat of the Recreation and Community Services Element to correct the acreage of Central Park and update the senior center language to reflect the 2006 Measure T vote and reference the senior center project in Central Park. One other change includes an update to Table RCS-1 to identify the senior center as a recreational amenity in Central Park. Pursuant to California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duty given, held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. I 1-004 and recommended approval of said entitlement to the City Council; and Pursuant to California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and; The City Council finds that said General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 is necessary for the changing needs and orderly development of the community, is necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan, and is consistent with other elements of the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the real property that is the subject of this Resolution (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") consists of five acres and is general located southwest of the intersection of Talbert Avenue and Goldenwest Street between the disc golf course, which is at a higher elevation and the Shipley Nature Center, and is more particularly described in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and `B", respectively, and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 12-3173n5938 1 Resolution No. 2012-19 SECTION 2: That General Plan Amendment No. 11-004, which amends the General Plan Recreation and Community Services Element to reflect changes to and incorporate the Central Park Master Plan is hereby approved. The Director of Planning and Building is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended Recreation and Community Services Element. A copy of said Recreation and Community Services Element, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Planning and Building Department. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6 th day of April , 2012. Mayor RE WAND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ci M ager ity Attorney i�`: '- t3-1� II�TI IATE AND APPROVED: Director of Planning and wilding ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Map Exhibit C: General Plan Changes 12-3173/75938 2 Resolution No.2012-19 Resolution No.2012-19 EXHIBITA LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Section 34 of Township 5 South, Range II West, in the Rancho Las Bolsa Chica, in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said County, described as follows: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34, THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION, SAID EAST LINE ALSO BEING THE CENTERLINE OF GOLDENWEST STREET AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 92-1084, RECORDED IN RECORD OF SURVEY BOOK 138, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SOUTH 00°16'29" WEST 91.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST 142.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00°16'36" WEST 465.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST 465.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" EAST 97.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" EAST .96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" EAST 368.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" EAST 466.40 FEET; BEGINNING. Resolution No.2012-19 ks lip, -77, pow-- rl 44� YJ ZN 57 M.� Rpiga, i4 Tx Resolution No.2012-19 Resolution No.2012-19 TECHMCAL SYN®PSIS The City of Huntington Beach's recreational opportunities consist of parks, golf courses, and coastal amenities, including approximately 9.5 miles of coastal parks and beaches.' This first section summarizes the Technical Background Report's existing conditions discussion. The existing condition summary is followed by the Recreation and Community Services Goals, Objectives,Policies,Implementation Programs, and Implementation Matrix. A. NON-COASTAL PARKS AND RECREATION 1. Existing Parks and Recreation Facilities Huntington Beach contains 75 parks which encompass 758.61 acres. These include 10 mini parks totaling 4.58 acres, 52 neighborhood parks totaling 177.54 acres, 10 community parks totaling 168.33 acres, and three regional parks(Huntington Central Park,Blufftop Park and OC Regional Weider Park)encompassing 407.90 acres. Regional facilities adjacent to Huntington Beach include Sunset Aquatic Park in Seal Beach (95 acres/260 boat slips),Mile Square Park in Fountain Valley(632 acres), and Bolsa Chica Ecological Preserve in Orange County(300 acres).' The future parks to be developed are as follows: a. Four neighborhood parks will be developed with the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan. b. The proposed Harriet M. Weider Regional Park will link the Central Park with the Bolsa Chica State Beach. The 106 (approximate) acre passive park will provide tot lots, bicycle and pedestrian trails, equestrian trails, and a wetlands interpretive center. c. The five (5) acre Gibbs Park has a natural eucalyptus grove. This grove, which covers approximately 60 percent to 70 percent of the site, is a passive park with interpretive elements. The remainder of the park will provide traditional neighborhood park amenities. d. The 30 acre Bartlett Park with the historic Newland House, will be further developed, although the City has not determined what facilities will be established. Irby Park, an 11-acre site, has three developed acres and the City intends to develop two additional acres. The remaining six acres will be sold and the funds will be used for other park development. Although City Council has authorized surplusing the additional acreage, it has not been sold due to the extreme peat condition of the soil. e. Huntington Central Park is 3-78 343 acres of which 2-20 266 acres are developed with uses such as the Central Library, Shipley Nature Center and the 45-acre Sports Complex. The -emakiiag 15 eluded iii the 1994 Master-D� of Uses in Geatra4 P The remaininz 77 acres are planned for various passive and active recreation uses as depicted in the Central Park Master Plan of Uses (refer to Figure RCS-2). The Central Park Master Plan of Uses is periodically reviewed and updated as projects and improvements are implemented and new projects are proposed to be incorporated. 2. Community Centers Edison Community Center (21377 Magnolia Street) and Murdy Community Center (7060 Norma Drive) located in community parks, are the focal points for the majority of the recreation programs offered by the City of Huntington Beach. Instructional classes, tennis classes, youth sports, and adult softball are among the programs conducted at the centers. Inside the facilities are meeting halls, and game rooms with pool, 'The information in this paragraph reflects General Plan Amendment No.10-002 (Sunset Beach Annexation) adopted by the City Council on October 18 2010 The Annexation is pending approval OF A Local Coastal Program Amendment by the California Coastal Commission. III-RCS-1 Resolution No.2012-19 table tennis, foosball, video games, and other table games. Outside areas include tennis, basketball, and volleyball courts, softball/athletic fields, racquetball/handball, tot play areas, horseshoe pits, and picnic areas. The centers also host extracurricular activities for many of the local schools and civic organizations. 3. Seniors' Center The Rodgers Seniors' Center, located at 1706 Orange Avenue, provides a variety of free services to the City's elderly population including: employment information, housing assistance, Golden State Senior Discount Program, utility tax exemption credit, paramedic assistance and Vial of Life Program,postal alert, voter registration, surplus commodities distribution, Handy Crafters Club, Singing Goodtimers, and other special activities. Aging of the general population resulting in an increase of the senior population will increase demand for senior services. The City should assess pessibilifies fer- building a new fiwility iii the futufe te fneet. iner-eased denmpd—. In 2006,the City's voters approved a new senior center in Central Park subiect to entitlement and environmental clearances. The new senior center would be larger and more centrally-located than the current senior center and able to accommodate the existing and future demands of the City's growing senior population. The new senior center is included in the Central Park Master Plan of Uses(Figure RCS-2)in an area designated for high intensity recreation uses. Huntington Beach operates an Outreach Center (1718 Orange Avenue) adjacent to the Rodgers Seniors' Center. The Outreach facility contains approximately 2,624 square feet. This Center houses offices and workrooms for ten employees and numerous volunteers. Outreach services for the elderly population are coordinated from this facility. These support services are: Home delivered meals Telecare Case management CHERISH(Community Helpers engaged in Restoring Transportation and Improving Senior's Home) Information and Referral Bright Outlook Newsletter Counseling/support groups On a daily basis, staff members leave the Center and engage in fieldwork which comprises making visits to older adults' homes and linking them to other senior service providers in the community. Outreach serves 400 older adults on a monthly basis. 4. Golf Courses The two publicly owned golf courses are 1) Driftwood Course an 11-acre, 9-hole pitch `n' putt course, located on Pacific Coast Highway, and 2) Meadowlark Golf Course, a 96 acre, 18-hole course, located on Graham Street. In addition, the Seacliff Country Club golf course is an 18-hole, 140-acre private course located on Palm Avenue. Driftwood Golf Course is operated by a concessionaire who contracts with Mayer Corporation. The City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency is the owner of the property,but has leased the land to the Mayer Corporation. Meadowlark Golf Course is on City-owned land and is also ran by a concessionaire who reports to the City of Huntington Beach. Both Golf Courses are open to the general public. 5. Huntington Beach City Gym and Pool The City Gym and Pool, located at 16th Street and Palm Avenue, offers indoor swimming, showers, volleyball and basketball courts, a recreation room, and meeting room. The 0.8 acre gym site is owned by the City of MwAingtfln Beach III-RCS-3 Resolution No.2012-19 � o co co v LL C Y d @ L aj Qj O c " U v a 0 v 0 o s Q H E c o a T L CO cn a u m a CO m c m ( 'v O U m m mY c�v O O O io 0 Cral a" t ° Q ° E m c v v ° u L N > o c m v v o .c v 3 v m c�J m d U m L O h T O fY6 II. U R y Y uO O 3 0 E � O Q m m m 'm U Ulu w LL U = Z O 'a z m cn N cn N N > > Arevalos Park 1 2.58 Baca Park 2 14.35 Bailey Park(formerly Seacliff#1) 3 0.59 ® ® _ Banning/Magnolia Park 4 1.18 Bartlett Park 5 27.73 Bauer Park 6 2.04 ®. ® ® ® - - _ ... __. Bluff Top Park 7 19.66 ® ® ® x. Bolsa View Park 8 2.70- - Booster Park 9 0.85 Burke Park 10' .2.50 ® .` Bushard Park 11 2.38 Carr Park 12 10:72 Circle View Park 13 2.31 Clegg Stacey Park 14 2.80 College View Park 15 2.70 Conrad Park 16 2.71 Davenport Beach Park 17 0.46 Discovery Well Park 18 6.60 Drew Park 19 2.28 ® ® ® ® - - _ - - Eader Park 20 2.68 __. .. Edison Park 21 39.69 ® ® ® ® ® ® ®77 ® Farquhar Park. 22 3.52 Finley Park(formerly Seacliff#2) 23 0.56 Franklin Park .24 1.52 French Park 25 0.33 Gibbs Park 26 :6.83 ® ®, Gisler Park 27 11.67 Glen View Park 28 3.02 Golden View Park 29 2.81 Green Park. 30 4.04 Greer Park 31 10.44 ® ® ® ® ® Harbour View Park 32 4.02 r Haven View Park 33 2.95 ® ® ® Hawes Park 34'_.2.68 Helme Park 35 2.02 Hope View Park 36 Humboldt Beach Park 37 0.48 CITY PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES (page 1 of 2) W J CrTY OF HUNTINGTOI� BEACH GENERAL PLAN m H Resolution No.2012-19 N U H C v o m - v m to nn u 11 O C y O •iE O y = (6 O O LL v CO U N y >. d H ° CL 'O a m a m •� i° C7 = o U m m C 3 N a. F- N tL ° a1 O N v y L v .n v c v ° ° s 'm E > n > ° i m T E - s E Y Y v 'c a +° u E c - 3 m ° cc v _' m c o a o m m ° " v Y o 0 3 a c ° o Q m m m m U U U E U C7 S Z O 'a z m �n N H N H > > Huntington Central Park 38 343.24 ®: Irby Park 39 10.91 _ Lake Park 40 4.75 Lake View Park 41 2.16 ® ® ® ® Lamb Park 42 2.60 Lambert Park 43 3.50 Langenbeck Park 44 17.02 Lark View Park 45 3.65 LeBard:Park 46 4.99 Manning Park 47 2.46 ® ® ® ® Marina Park 48 9.34.. - _ . Marine View Park 49 2.96 MCCallen Park 50 5.84 Moffett Park 51 2.38 Murdy Park 52 Newland Park 53 2.94 Oak View.Park 54 1.31 ® .. ® ® ®. e ® ®_ _ ® " y - -Orange County Regional Park(Weider) 55 45.01 Patti nson Park 56 3.51 Perry Park 57 1.88 Pleasant View Park 58 2.17 Prince Park 59 0.22 _ Robinwood Park 60 1.41 Schroeder Park 61 2.37 Seabridge Park 62 3.91 Seeley Park 63 3.37 Sowers Park 64 "2:65 ® Sunset Beach Greenbelt Park 65 6.41 16 - - - - Sun View Park . . 66 2.45 Talbert Park 67 5.44 Tarbox Park 68 0.44 Terry Park 69 4.81 ® ® ® Triangle Park 70 1.11 - Trinidad Park 71 0.75 Wardlow Park 72 8.36 ® Wieder Park 73 4.80 Worthy Park 74 11.33 -- 11th Street Beach Park 75 0.17 A. CITY PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES (page 2 of 2) W J in H Resolution No.2012-19 CENTRAL PARK ( ASTER PLAN OF USES tP.MT'OF EMTING M L4TENANCE-? . FACILLTY I,5 EXPANSION INCLUDES THE-- ADD121 OF ZOCI SOUARE I FEET , \Slater Ave - L 1 .r- M,A]i�lZ�ENI>NCF: I CRY PWLK.TR� PAAI ANP- EX51 N AREA���' �LANDSCW'E ImA1 YAfU FACILITY WILL MCLURE: ENHANCEIJ IMPROVEMENTS AND •C3�4SC>i1GATIOYN _1�� � `� Senior TING Senior Center r••—••— - PARCOURSE -= TT..�,� - TALBERT LAKE! (.l High intensity EXISTING f M OW EXISTING SHIPLEY NATURE { AMPITIMEAlEIR Recreation Area CENTER 6 � . Oun=k +wuslc AREA �7USTI IJG - ,b t�� - 'ADVENTURE �,'rQ � PLAYCrTtOU� [[ AD Elf m-3 SHELTER 9-acre Low Intensity -Talb rt Ave Recreation Area ka 4 '" _ a�— K yg - L "i %"}—" � ppppppP.'a.C.,. Q 01— 4 iy a t %a>EW[fie® 1 _ 1L'JM1ITIhUTON LdKE Q lE �1 3 COUNTYOORS GIN I O TRANSFER STATION RANGE • �� r L v I Ea AS, DESt TATION r l i •o $ BASINa�{l +h+ EQEXISUNG UESTRIAN 1ER EQUESTRIAN IILI {{ W v gl a SDP A. �l URBARaF�REST j0 1 OCEAN VIEW accEss TQ_ � i 4 'T�SEfr�f �l ` r"ESTATCS MOSTLE - WEDNAL .. HOMES ER M. RE7 APARK . 1:L6 AWstP�• .. ACCESS TO TRAM FRCYI� L 4 Ellis Ave EOQUCSTRIAN CSTAT'E$ E7(157TNG MUL719UFP65..c TRAIL 't AREA TO INCLUDE MASSES 0.TREES-' � l' Or VARIOUS SELECTED SPECIES -'T:ACIMY NNC(VrES_SHADE SHELTEk.PittfvY,-C-� FACILITY INC4.41D;•S:ACCESS R`JTIi .� LFACILTTY TN�amm ACCESS ROAD Fkam ELLIS TAMS,HITCV1144a P'JS1,SIKE RACKS,AND FROM,ELLIS AMENJE AVENU RESTROOM DUMNIG PICNIC SHELTER UFF R3?{p:•GGE-'�fIER,OF`eN T AND - I FISMNt:DSCM IRAILS,OrvN YLAF AREAS,RAWNG - OVERFLOW PARKIN.. RESTROCW, I LOT;VOLLEYBALL-COURT,AND=LOT FACILITY 6NCLUMS-ACCESS ROAD FROM ELLIS BUIEDING.701 LOST AND:XQUAlICS 1 AVENUE,RESTRC OM 6UIMING,PARKING LOT '-PAClS97Y 1NCLUD :ACCESS FROM WITH STANDARV SPACES,A`+IR EQU7ES''RIkN CEI!7LELi _[ALTERNATE SITE) TALBERT AVENUE-d"C'OIEFD NWEST _- TRAUER.PARKING SPACES STREET GRAVEL-PAR1 NG LOT, . EIGTiG[6FF 6GMTEGI-SCICCEk FIELDS E G4T LIGHTED Therapeutic DALLFELQS,FOI}a[4d ROLLER HOCKEY COURTS .BATTING , CAGE-TWO db�RCESSIO+sv - — � Riding Center RESTROOM [WINGS,IWO? " TOTLOTS,6 P-TRCSHELTER [tom u \`� BEACH,CITY OF HUNTINGTON CALIFORNIA * Proposed Figure RCS-2 Res. No. 2012-19 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH. ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on April 16, 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr NOES: Shaw, Boardman ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 01 y Clerk and ex-offici Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 07-039 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 07-039R: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039R to permit the construction and operation of up to a 45,000 square foot senior recreation facility will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. A SEIR that analyzed the project's potential to generate detrimental impacts on people and surrounding properties was prepared and concluded that, with mitigation, there are no significant project specific impacts. In addition, being that the project is located in Central Park, the closest adjacent residences are located approximately 800 feet west of the project site. One significant cumulative impact to aesthetics was identified in the SEIR and as such, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, which discusses the benefits of the project in relation to the cumulative impact, is required for approval of the project. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039R will be compatible with surrounding uses because it is consistent with the applicable General Plan Land Use and Zoning land use designations for the site. Although the proposed project will result in the development of a new senior center on existing open space, the project will be compatible with the established recreational land use pattern in the area, specifically existing community facilities such as the Central Library and Sports Complex adjacent to the proposed project site. Within this context, the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding parkland and is a permitted use within the General Plan and Zoning land use designations. The proposed project would add a senior recreation facility on land currently designated for recreational uses consistent with the revised Central Park Master Plan adopted as part of General Plan Amendment No. 11-004. The project will not result in a loss of parkland resulting in a deficiency Citywide. The proposed building features a design with architectural features that minimize the visual bulk and mass of the buildings and provides for compatibility with the surrounding parkland. The project complies with all of the requirements for development in the OS-PR zoning district and provides an adequate number of parking spaces. To integrate the project with the natural setting of the Shipley Nature Center and existing passive parkland west of the project site, substantial landscaping is proposed throughout the site, including surrounding the entire perimeter of the project site. 3. Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039R will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, including the Open Space — Parks & Recreation zone permitted uses and minimum setbacks. Parking requirements are determined by the conditional use permit and are specific to the requested use. A sufficient number of parking spaces is provided for the project based on surveys of similar projects. 4. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039R will not adversely affect the General Plan. It is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of OS-P (Open Space - Parks) on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: Air Quality Element PolicyAQ 1.8.3: Encourage developers to maintain the natural topography, to the maximum extent possible, and limit the amount of land clearing, blasting, grading, and ground excavation operations needed for development. The proposed project anticipates a balanced site with minor cut and fill operations during construction. Policy AQ 1.10.1: Continue to require the utilization and installation of energy conservation features in all new construction. As with all new buildings, the proposed project will be required to comply with the energy conservation standards of Title 24, which would ensure that there would be no wasteful or unnecessary use of energy. In addition, the project is pursuing sustainable design elements similar to those utilized in the development of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) buildings. Circulation Element Goal CE 2: Provide a circulation system which supports existing, approved and planned land uses throughout the City while maintaining a desired level of service on all streets and at all intersections. Objective CE 3.2: Encourage new development that promotes and expands the use of transit services. Policy CE 6.1.6: Maintain existing pedestrian facilities and require new development to provide pedestrian walkways and bicycle routes between developments, schools, and public facilities. Policy CE 6.1.7: Require new development to provide accessible facilities to the elderly and disabled. Policy CE 7.1.7: Continue to construct landscaped medians in existing major and primary arterial streets and continue to require the construction of landscaped medians in new developments. The proposed senior center project will be required to comply with the requirements of the ADA. The proposed project will also provide ADA access to the site via a pedestrian path north of the access driveway. The project includes parking spaces and a drop-off area for shuttle vehicles to provide senior transit services to and from the facility. The proposed project includes construction of a planned access driveway at the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue. The new access driveway includes modifying the existing traffic signal at the intersection and a proposed landscaped median. Finally, the proposed project would not contribute to a reduction in the level of service of surrounding streets and intersections resulting in a deficient circulation system. Environmental Hazards Element Policy EH 4.1.1: During major redevelopment or initial construction, require specific measures to be taken by developers, builders, or property owners in flood prone areas, to prevent or reduce damage from flood hazards and the risks upon human safety. Although the site is partially located in Flood Zone A, the project site is already a minimum of 4 feet higher than the base flood elevation at its lowest point. A flood elevation certificate will be required for the proposed project. Growth Management Element Goal GM 2: Ensure that adequate transportation and public facilities and public services are provided for existing and future residents of the City. The proposed project would provide a public facility to serve the expanding senior population in the City and be large enough to accommodate future demand. The proposed project does not result in any significant traffic impacts and adequate public facilities and services are available to serve the development. Hazardous Materials Element Policy HM 1.2.3: Support land use or developments adjacent to or within close proximity of sensitive uses, which do not utilize, store, handle, or contain hazardous materials and/or waste, and which would create an unsafe, unhealthy, or hazardous condition for adjacent uses. i Construction and operation of the proposed senior center would not include the use of large quantities of hazardous materials, and any commonly used hazardous materials would be used and stored in accordance with applicable regulations. Implementation of the proposed project would not create an unsafe or hazardous condition for adjacent uses. Land Use Element Policy LU 4.2.1: Require that all structures be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Cfty's building and other pertinent codes and regulations; including new, adaptively re-used, and renovated buildings. Policy LU 4.2.4. Require that all development be designed to provide adequate space for access, parking, supporting functions, open space and other pertinent elements. Policy LU 4.2.5: Require that all commercial, industrial and public development incorporate appropriate design elements to facilitate access and use as required by State and Federal Laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). The proposed project will be constructed in accordance with existing laws and regulations, including the California Building Code, the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and any applicable State and federal law requirements such as ADA. In addition, the project is proposed to be in conformance with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and is not seeking any variances to deviate from the code requirements. Adequate access to and from the project site will be provided through the entrance at the Goidenwest Street/Talbert Avenue intersection. Sufficient parking will be provided on site for the senior center use and a recommended condition of approval would ensure that ADA parking spaces would exceed the minimum required. The site also maximizes open space through the provision of outdoor amenities such as a patio, a garden and a fountain courtyard area with over an acre of landscaped area. Recreation and Community Services Element Policy RCS 1.1.1: Provide leisure opportunities through programs and activities that serve the general population as well as the specialized needs of the disabled, children and elderly. Policy RCS 2.1.1: Maintain the current park per capita ratio of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons, which includes the beach in the calculation. Policy RCS 3.1.2: Provide a variety of amenities within recreation areas in order to accommodate persons with different interests. Policy RCS 3.1.7. Design recreational facilities to the accessibility requirements as specified in State and Federal laws such as the Americana with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards for accessibility. The proposed project is a senior recreation facility proposed to be developed in accordance with ADA standards. In addition, the project would provide accessible parking spaces exceeding ADA requirements. The senior center and associated amenities will provide the City with expanded recreational resources for a diverse senior population large enough to meet existing and future demand. The senior center will be accessible to all residents of the City of Huntington Beach and provide a needed community facility for the entire City. Although the proposed General Plan Amendment would re-designate the project site from a low intensity recreation area to a high intensity recreation area on the Central Park Master Plan, the project site would not result in a reduction in City parkland and the City's established "park per capita" ratio would be maintained in accordance with Policy RCS 2.1.1. Urban Design Element Goal UD 1: Enhance the visual image of the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed project features an architectural design that will blend, to the extent possible, with the park setting of the surrounding area. Materials include an abundance of wood, glass, stone and stucco. The design also incorporates a variety of forms, wall planes, roof lines, offsets, exterior finish materials and decorative architectural elements such as a wood trellis patio and an outdoor fountain courtyard area. The proposed landscaping includes meadow grasses and native and non-native drought tolerant plants that are compatible with the landscaped areas of the passive park west of the project site, Shipley Nature Center to the north, and the Sports Complex to the east across Goldenwest Street. Utilities Element Objective U 1.2. Ensure that existing and new development does not degrade the City's surface waters and groundwater basins. Objective U 1.3: Minimize water consumption rates through site design, use of efficient systems, and other techniques. Policy U 1.3.2: Continue to require the incorporation of water conservation features in the design of all new and existing uses such as the use of native plants, low flow toilets and water efficient appliances. Policy U 3.3.2: Where feasible, utilize natural overland flows, open channels, and swale routings as preferred alignments for components of drainage systems. Policy U 3.3.3. Require that new developments employ the most efficient drainage technology to control drainage and minimize damage to environmental sensitive areas. The proposed project includes bioswales and vegetated buffer areas to treat runoff from the proposed project's impervious areas. Implementation of BMPs and the project's directing of stormwater flows through the park and Huntington Lake will ensure that project implementation would not adversely impact sensitive environments such as the Shipley Nature Center. Additionally, the project would comply with the City's Municipal Code to reduce water consumption and stormwater runoff. A final Water Quality Management Plan is required to be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works prior to grading permit issuance. Finally, the project will incorporate sustainable site development strategies and utilize water savings features to ensure compliance with City policies to maximize water conservation efforts. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 07-039R: 1. The project plans received and dated October 17, 2007 shall be the conceptually approved design with the following modifications. a. The gate located at the terminus of the access driveway shall be relocated to the south edge of the reconfigured "T" intersection. b. The number of ADA parking spaces shall be increased to 20. Once the facility is operational, the number of ADA spaces may be revised as determined necessary by the Community Services Department. 2. The project shall strive to achieve LEED certification. A variety of sustainable features shall be used and may include (but are not limited to) those recommended by the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Program certification (http://www.usgbc.org[DisalayPage.aspx?Category]D=19) or Build It Green's Green Building Guidelines and Rating Systems (hftp://www.builditgreen.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=,quidelines . 3. Prior to submittal for plan check, the final project design and landscape plans shall be consistent with those approved by the City Council on August 17, 2009. The final landscape plans shall incorporate a variety of tree, shrub and grass species that are currently planted at adjacent uses, including the Sports Complex, Shipley Nature Center and the passive park west of the project site. Meadow grasses shall be planted in the northwest corner of the project site and include species that occur at Shipley Nature Center consistent with the August 17, 2009 City Council approved plan. If the final plans substantially change from the August 17, 2009 Council approved plans, as determined by the Director of Planning and Building, the final project design and landscape plans shall require further review by the Design Review Board and approval by the Planning Commission at a non-public hearing. 4. At least 14 days prior to any grading activity, the applicant/developer shall provide notice in writing to property owners of record and tenants of properties within a 500-foot radius of the project site as noticed for the public hearing. The notice shall include a general description of planned grading activities and an estimated timeline for commencement and completion of work and a contact person name with phone number. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, a copy of the notice and list of recipients shall .be submitted to the Planning Department. 5. A public art element, approved by the Design Review Board, Director of Planning, and Director of Huntington Beach Art Center, shall be depicted on the plans. Public Art shall be innovative, original, and of artistic excellence; appropriate to the design of the project; and reflective of the community's cultural identity(ecology, history; or society). 6. The project shall comply with all mitigation measures adopted in conjunction with Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION: The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof. i HUNTINGTON BEACH SE CENTER Findings of Fact/ Statement of overriding Considerations Prepared for City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department 2000 Main Street,Third Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 Prepared by ATKINS 12301 Wilshire Boulevard,Suite 430 Los Angeles, California 90025 January 2012 Contents CHAP] R 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................1-1 CHAPTER2 CEQA Findings......................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................2-1 CHAPTER 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives...............................................................3-1 3.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Project Objectives...........................................................................................................3-1 3.3 Selection of Alternatives.................................................................................................3-2 3.4 Project Alternative Findings..........................................................................................3-2 3.4.1 Huntington Beach Senior Center Alternatives............................................3-2 CHAPTER 4 Statement of Overriding Considerations ...............................................................4-1 4.1 Introduction........................................................................................................... 4.2 Significant Adverse Cumulative Impact.......................................................................4-1 4.3 Findings.............................................................................................. ............ ............4-2 4.4 Overriding Considerations.............................................................................................4-2 Table Table 2-1 CEQA Findings for the Huntington Beach Senior Center................................................2-3 Huntington Beach Senior Center SEIR Findings of FacVStatement of Overriding Considerations iii CHAPTER 1 Introduction This document presents the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations that must be adopted by the City of Huntington Beach (City) pursuant to the requirements of Sections 15091 and 15093, respectively, of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) prior to the approval of the Huntington Beach Senior Center(proposed project). This document is organized as follows: Chapter 1 Introduction to the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. Chapter 2 Presents the CEQA Findings of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR),including the identified significant cumulative impact. Chapter 3 Presents the alternatives to the proposed project and evaluates them in relation to the findings contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a.)(3). The City must consider and make findings regarding alternatives when a project would involve environmental impacts that cannot be reduced to a less-than-significant level, or cannot be substantially reduced,by proposed mitigation measures. Chapter 4 Presents a Statement of Overriding Considerations that is required in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 for significant impacts of the proposed project that cannot be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. The proposed project involves development of a new one-story multi-purpose senior center on undeveloped land in Central Park. The 5 acre development would comprise the senior center, parking areas, vehicular storage, outdoor common areas, and a service area. Open space areas would consist of courtyards, gardens, and landscaping/planting pocket areas. Landscaping around the building and parking lot would be drought-tolerant,low water usage-type vegetation. A new access driveway planned at Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue for ingress/egress to the project site would be constructed with the proposed project. An existing traffic signal at this location would be modified for traffic to enter the project site.As Goldenwest Street is elevated above the site, an ADA ramp from the site to the intersection as well as from the OCTA bus stop located near the Goldenwest Street/Talbert Avenue intersection would be provided for pedestrian access.A total of 227 parking spaces would be provided including spaces for ADA parking and shuttle buses. Under the proposed project, no significant unavoidable impacts would occur on a project level. However, a significant cumulative impact would occur to aesthetics. In comparison to the alternatives analyzed against the proposed development, the City finds that the Alternative Central Park Site Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative. The following discretionary approvals by the City of Huntington Beach are required to implement the proposed project: • Conditional Use Permit Request—To permit construction of a senior recreation facility in Huntington Beach Central Park with a 3-foot grade differential. • Design Review approval(only required if substantial changes are made to existing design) Huntington Beach Senior Center SEIR Findings of FacVStatement of Overriding Considerations 1-1 Chapter 1 Introduction i ® Central Park Master Plan Amendment Amendment to the Central Park Master Plan land use designation for the 5-acre project site from the current low-intensity designation to the proposed high-intensity designation. • General Plan Amendment: Recreation and Community Services Element—Amendment to the Recreation and Community Services Element of the City's General Plan to (1) identify the proposed project as the intended location of the proposed senior center; (2)increase the use intensity on this site from low-intensity to high-intensity; and (3) incorporate the Central Park Master Plan into the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan. 12 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of FacVStatement of overriding Considerations CHAPTER 2 CEQA Findings 2.1. INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the potential impacts that were identified in the SEIR and the findings that are required in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15091. The possible findings for each significant and/or potentially significant adverse impact are as follows: (a) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which avoid, substantially lessen, or reduce the magnitude of the significant environmental effect as identified in the SEIR("Finding 1"). (b)Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the findings. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency ("Finding 2"). (c) Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives in the SEIR ("Finding 3"). CEQA requires that the lead agency adopt mitigation measures or alternatives,where feasible, to avoid or substantially reduce significant environmental impacts that would otherwise occur as a result of a project- Project modification or alternatives are not required, however, where they are infeasible or where the responsibility for modifying the project lies with some other agency (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, subd. (a), [31). Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines "feasible" to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." CEQA Guidelines Section 15364 adds another factor: "legal" considerations (see also Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors [Goleta II] [1990] 52 Cal.3d 553, 565 [276 Cal. Rptr.410]). Only after fully complying with the findings requirement can an agency adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Citizens for Quality Growth v. City of Mount Shasta [1988] 198 CaLApp.3d 433. 442, 445 [243 Cal. Rptr. 727]). CEQA requires the Lead Agency to state in writing the specific rationale to support its actions based on the Final SEIR and/or information in the record. This written statement is known as the Statement of Overriding Considerations. The Statement of Overriding Considerations provides the information that demonstrates the decision making body of the Lead Agency has weighed the benefits of the project against its unavoidable adverse effects in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be considered"acceptable." The California Supreme Court has stated that, "the wisdom of approving any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests,is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions.The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced" (Goleta II, 52 Cal.3d 553, 576 [276 CaL Rptr,401]). Huntington Beach Senior Center SEIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 2-1 Chapter 2 CEQA Findings This document presents the City of Huntington Beach findings as required by CEQA, cites substantial evidence in the record in support of each of the findings, and presents an explanation to supply the logical step between the finding and the facts in the record (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091). Additional facts that support the findings are set forth in the Draft SEIR,the Final SEIR, staff reports to the Planning Commission,and the record of proceedings. Table 2-1 (CEQA Findings for the Huntington Beach Senior Center) summarize the potentially significant impacts of the SEIR that were reduced to less-than-significant levels with mitigation as well as the significant cumulative impact identified, as currently proposed for certification and adoption of the proposed project. 2-2 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of overriding Considerations Chapter 2 CEQA Findings . 0 Q a ® 0 0 0 0 .,.._. .., .: .. ,. ,. ,,. ..r,-i ua. ... ,.,.,,,,, s:hh .; ..,:.,.. .. .:�; . . ,.. � x :_a5 a ,.. e .. ,rm� t i ?,,,r { , H.....�i ,1 i.,< :F S r i,f irl`I 14 I } ,}.i.+�.,rT,r .5�� :1 :L, i F..F. �,. :j.j. .�,�k_ r;l.i' :1t? :: Aesthetics Impact 4.1-3. Implementation of the proposed project would The micro-ecology of the site and adjacent open space areas Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or introduce new sources of light and glare into the project could result in potentially significant impacts on sensitive species alterations in the project, which would reduce vicinity from project lighting and activities. However, implementation of Impact 4.1-3 to less-khan-significant levels,are hereby mitigation measures MM4.1-3(a) through (c) would reduce incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation impacts associated with onsite lighting as the lowest levels of measures are necessary with the implementation of illumination would be required, and lighting on site would not Mitigation Measures MM4.1-3(a)through(e). remain on at all times during the nighttime hours. Glare from headlights entering and exiting the site from Goldenwest Street would be momentarily visible to uses across Goldenwest (upon exiting the site) and perhaps, distantly, the residential uses to the west and north on entering the project.With implementation of mitigation measures MM4.1-3(d) and (e), non- reflective fagade treatments would be used to the extent feasible and substantial landscaping would be provided throughout the site to soften building appearance and glare. Cumulative Aesthetics Impact Given that the project would modify land that is currently Finding No. 3. The City finds that the cumulative undeveloped and the character of Central Park would be altered, impact is a result of incremental development which the proposed project would result in a cumulatively considerable reduces the amount of open space within the park.No impact. Landscaping and open space would be provided, which feasible mitigation is available. would enhance the site's visual contribution to the surrounding park lands, and the project would not appear out of character when compared with surrounding land uses. However, the increase in development intensity of the project site, when compared with current uses, contributes incrementally to the visual degradation of the area In terms of reducing the amount of undeveloped open space within Central Park. This would be considered a significant cumulative impact. Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact,/Statement of Overriding Considerations 2-3 Chapter 2 CEQA Findings U, Tab�le.2-1 CEQA Findingsifortheff Mington Beach SeNdr,ce%ee IF CAN R Tr`-� 1"MI , 1 .CIF I TIN R'. "W U C. M, "A V N 'H; _10110:1011•- 'A'I U4 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 4.2-2. Peak construction activities associated with Construction related daily emissions would not exceed SCAQMD Finding 1. The City finds that changes or alterations the proposed project could generate emissions that exceed significance thresholds. However, these calculations assume that have been required in, or incorporated into, the SCAQMD thresholds. appropriate dust control measures would be implemented during project,which would reduce Impact 4.2-2 to lewthan- each phase of development as required by SCAQMD Rule 403— significant levels. No additional mitigation measures Fugitive Dust, and that all other appropriate mitigation(mitigation are necessary with the implementation of CR4.2-2(a) measures MM4.2-2(a)through MM4.2-2(e))as well as appropriate through (f) and mitigation measures MM4.2-2(a) Code requirements CR4.2-2(a) through (f) have been through(e). implemented. Thus, all identified city code requirements and I mitigation measures are required. Biological Resources Impact 4.3-1.The proposed project could have a substantial Potential direct or indirect Impacts to burrowing owls are Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or adverse Impact either directly(e.g.,habitat loss)or indirectly considered a potentially significant impact. In addition, project alterations in the project, which would reduce (e.g., noise effects on wildlife)through habitat modifications, implementation and construction-related activities may result in Impact 4.3-1 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby on any species identified or published as an endangered, the disturbance of nesting species protected by the MBTA. Prior incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation threatened, rare, candidate, sensitive, or special-status to the onset of ground disturbance activities, the City shall measures are necessary with the Implementation of species by CDFG or USFWS, and meets the definition of implement mitigation measures MM4.3 I(a) through 4.3-1(b) and mitigation measures MM4.3-1(a) and 4.3-1(b) and Section 15380(b),(c),or(d)of the CEQA guidelines. Project Requirement PR4.3-1, which entail focused surveys and project requirement PR4.3-1 avoidance measures for the burrowing owl and sensitive nesting and MBTA species,and appropriate agency consultation. Impact 4.3-2. Development of the proposed project would As a result of project Implementation, approximately 5 acres of Finding 1.The City finds that the Identified changes or have a substantial adverse impact to raptor foraging habitat. ruderal vegetation that is suitable for use as raptor foraging alterations in the project, which would reduce habitat would be removed, Although implementation of the Impact 4.3-2 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby proposed project would remove approximately 5 acres of existing incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation foraging habitat within the currently-designated Low Intensity measures are necessary with the implementation of Recreation Area, implementation of mitigation measure MM4.3-2 mitigation measure MM4.3-2. would ensure impacts to raptor foraging habitat would be I mitigated at a ratio of 1:1. 2-4 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Chapter 2[EQ4RndIngs Cubumall Resources lmpact4.4-1. Construction of the proposed project could While not expected,in the event that an intact portion of CA-ORA- Finding 1 The City finds that the identified changes or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of 142 Is identified, the potential for damage to or destruction of alterations in the project, which would reduce previously unknown archaeological resources that could be these cultural resources would be a potentially significant impact. Impact 4.4-1 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby present on the project site. Implementation of mitigation measures MM4.4-1(a) through (c) incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation would require monitoring of construction activities by a qualified measures are necessary with the implementation of professional archaeologist and would require the scientific mitigation measures MM4.4-1(a)through(c). recovery and evaluation of any archaeological resources that could be encountered, which would ensure that important scientific information that could be provided by these resources regarding history or prehistory is not lost, Impact 4.4-2. Paleontological resources could be present Even though previous activities may have involved excavation or Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or within rock units on the project site, and could be damaged other earth-disturbing activities, some paleontologicaliy sensitive alterations in the project, which would reduce or destroyed by earth-moving activities resulting from rock units underlying the project site may not have been Impact 4.4-2 to less-than-signlficant levels,are hereby implementation of the proposed project. disturbed, despite the possible destruction of surface evidence of incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation their presence.Therefore,the impact resulting from damage to,or measures are necessary with the implementation of destruction of, these resources would be potentially significant, as mitigation measures MM4.4-1(a)and 4.4-1(b). it makes biological records of ancient life permanently unavailable for study by scientists. Mitigation measure MM4.4-1(a) requires monitoring of construction activities by a qualified,paleontologist, and mitigation measure MM4,4-1(b) requires implementation of additional provisional measures in the event that paleontological resources are identified. Impact 4.4-3. Construction actMUes associated with Pdthough not likely, the potential exists for archaeological Finding 1.The City finds that the Identified changes or implementation of the proposed project could result in the resources to be present and for excavation during construction alterations in the project, which would reduce umm/uaome of human remains, Including mvxe mtexou activities to disturb these resources, and it is possible that human impact 4.4-3 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby outside of formal cemeteries. burials could be associated with potential finds. To reduce this incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation impact, and as required by law, mitigafion measure MM4.4-3 measures are necessary with the implementation of reflects provisional measures if human remains are discovered on mitigation measure MM4.4-3. the project site. Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 2-5 Chapter 2{EQAFIndings ImpactImpact 4.5-1. The proposed project would not significantly The proposed project site is situated in a seismically active area. Finding 1 The City finds that the identified changes or expose people or structures to effects of seismic ground During the design life of the development, strong ground shaking alterations in the project, which would reduce shaking or liquefaction. may occur. Accordingly, the proposed structures and Impact 4.5-1 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby improvements could be adversely impacted by the seismic ground incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation shaking if proper mitigation measures are not implemented. measures are necessary with the implementation of Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.5-1 would ensure that mitigation measure MM4.6-1, design recommendations identified within the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the project site are implemented. Impact 4.5-2.The proposed project could expose people or There will be some grading along the north side adjacent to the Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or structures to effects of landslIdes. proposed access driveway off Goldenwest Street. Therefore, alterations in the project, which would reduce surficial sliding and erosion along this slope face could result in Impact4.5-2 to a less-than-significant level, are damage to the proposed project do to landslide and erosion. hereby incorporated into the project. No additional Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.5-2 would address mitigation measures are necessary with the these impacts. implementation of mitigation measure MM4.5-2. '—~ Development of the proposed '—~~ Trash and other debris were not observed in the old fill materials Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or be located _ potentially unstable_ (compressible, _ and Chapter 2 CEQA Findings T A EQA nd,1 FJ 01:21'-1-11 C ingsfQr�t h 6A b nt 04 gto In, B,6 E 1:0 h S e 0',"Wo,"J. 1;9, IM, "T[tFlElk']V "IliIE? t H R.12 ----vi NQ Hazards/Hazardous Materials Impact 4.6-1. Implementation of the proposed project could No knoven hazardous materials or wastes are present within the Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or create a significant hazard to the public or the environment proposed project site. Although not expected, grading and alterations in the project, which would reduce through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident excavation activities for the proposed project could result in the Impact 4.6-1 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into exposure of construction personnel and the public to previously incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation the environment. unidentified hazardous substances in the sail. Implementation of measures are necessary with the implementation of mitigation measures MM4.6-11(a) through (c) would ensure mitigation measures MM4.6-1(a)through 4.6-1(d). remedlation of contaminated soils containing hazardous materials prior to development of the proposed project and provide supplemental procedures in the event of unanticipated discoveries of contaminants. The project site is located within a designated methane gas overlay district. The City has set minimum requirements for new building construction within the methane overlay districts in order to reduce the hazards presented from accumulations of methane gas by requiring the appropriate testing and mitigation measures for all new buildings within the methane districts. Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.6-1(d) would ensure appropriate testing and methods of gas reduction,as required by the HBFD. HydrologyMater Quality Impact 4.7-1. Construction and operation of the proposed During the operational phase of the proposed project, the major Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or project could increase stormwater pollutant loads or source of pollution in stormwater runoff would be contaminants alterations in the project, which would reduce concentrations, which could result in a violation of water that have accumulated on rooftops and other impervious surfaces, Impact 4.7-1 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby quality standards or a substantial degradation of water such as parking lots, pedestrian walkways, and the off-site road incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation quality. improvement prior to connecting to the storm drain system, measures are necessary with the implementation of Implementation of the existing regulations including the mitigation measure MM4.7-1 MS4 Permit (adopted May 2009), the City's Municipal Code (Chapter 14.25), and the City's Local Implementation Plan (LIP), as well as mitigation measure MM4.7-1, the proposed project is required to develop and implement a project-specific WQMP that addresses appropriate stormwater quality best management practices (BMPs) and water quality management practices. As such, any post-construction violation of WDRs or water quality standards would be less than significant.In accordance Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 2-7 ........... Chapter 2 CEQA Findings . ® 'iGEQA'Fi n d ib,*p fbr ithi e H, ntfibakon( 8_0_0 S;enj(0 r,,,C3.e Jtgr `U- M MY 1,30 E 1,4 MR, sit i Impact 4.7-2. Implementation of the proposed project would Operation of the proposed project would result in a significant Finding 1,The City finds that the identified changes or alter the project site runoff characteristics that could result in change in land use and the potential for increased site runoff,both alterations in the project, which would reduce more on-site and off-site erosion. peak runoff rates and total storm flow volumes. The proposed Impact 4.7-2 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby project would be required to develop and implement a WQMP incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation including post-construction structural and non-structural BMPs for measures are necessary with the implementation of erosion and sediment controls, Implementation of mitigation mitigation measures MM4.7-1 and 4.7-2. measures MM4.7-1 and MM4.7-2 would reduce the potential storm flow rates to non-erosive conditions, reduce peak runoff rates to existing conditions levels to the maximum extent practicable, assure slope stabilization, and implementation of post-construction erosion and sediment control BMPs, thereby reducing potential impacts associated with on-site or off-site erosion to less-than-significant levels, Impact 4.7-3. Implementation of the proposed project would Operation of the proposed project would result in a significant Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or alter the project site runoff characteristics that could result in change in land use and the potential for increased site runoff for alterations in the project, which would reduce more flooding off-site. both peak runoff rates and total storm flow volumes. Higher peak Impact 4.7-3 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby storm flow rates and overall volume could result in off-site flooding incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation in the areas down-gradient from the project site. Implementation measures are necessary with the implementation of of mitigation measure MM4.7-2 would assure that on-site drainage mitigation measure MM4.7-2. is adequate to prevent on-site flooding and that peak stormwater runoff rates are reduced to the maximum extent practicable to prevent contributions to off-site flooding.As required by mitigation measure MM4,7-2, the Drainage Plan will include measures to reduce post-construction peak runoff rates and timing to existing levels, as ensured by the City's Public Works Department. As a result, the proposed project would not contribute to future runoff rates on site or to off-site areas (Including the Shipley Nature Center)above those that currently exist. Impact 4.7-4 Implementation of the proposed project may Operation of the proposed project would result in a significant Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or contribute runoff that would exceed the capacity of existing change in land use and may contribute runoff that would exceed alterations in the project, which would reduce stormwater drainage systems, the capacity of existing stormwater drainage systems. Impact 4.7-4 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.7-2 would reduce Incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation runoff rates to existing conditions levels to the maximum extent measures are necessary with the implementation of practicable, thereby, reducing potential impacts on the storm mitigation measure MM4.7-2. drainage system capacity. As a result, the existing system would have adequate conveyance capacity for the I 00-year storm event, 2-8 Huntington Beach Senior Center FIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Chapter 2 CEQA Findings ImpactImpact 4.7-5. Implementation of the proposed project may The amount, timing of application, and form of many landscape Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff chemicals can affect subsequent transport in stormwater, These alterations in the project, which would reduce during both construction and post-construction phases. activities could also result in additional sources of pollutants in Impact 4.7-5 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby runoff water from the proposed project. Implementation of incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation mitigation measure MM4.7-5 would maximize efficiency of measures are necessary with the implementation of landscape chemical applications and minimize the potential for mitigation measures MM4.7-1,4.7-2,and 47-5. chemicals in runoff water. ' proposed project ' Infiltration structures that are not correctly designed and sited Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or otherwise substantially UogmUo groundwater quality by could result in contaminated stormwater leaching into alterations in the project, which would reduce allowing infiltration of polluted stormwater. groundwater systems and destabilization of fill material.Mitigation Impact 4.7-6 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby measure MM4.7-2 would prevent implementation of stormwater incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation quality BMPs that could contribute to degradation of groundwater measures are necessary with the implementation of Noise Impact 4.9-1. Construction activities associated with the The residences ciosest to the project site are located immediately Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or proposed project would not exceed the standards west of the site, along Lakeview Drive, approximately 800 feet alterations in the project, which would reduce established in the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. from the site boundary.At this distance, typical daily construction Impact 4.9-1 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby activities (excavation and grading) could reach 62 dBA incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation Additionally,patrons utilizing the passive use park adjacent to the measures are necessary with the implementation of proposed project site could experience noise levels of up to 86 mitigation measures MM 4.9-1 (a) and (b) and Code dBA during construction activities. Implementation of mitigation requirements CR4.9-1 (a)and(b), measures MM4.9-1(a) and MM4.9-1(b) asi"well as Code requirements CR4.9-1(a) and CR4.9 1(b) would help minimize noise generated by construction activities associated with the I proposed project to the surrounding sensitive receptors, Recreation Impact 4.11-1, Construction activities associated with the Construction of the proposed project could disrupt one hole of the Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or proposed project may result In significant impacts to the existing disc golf course. Implementation of mitigation measure alterations in the project, which would reduce existing disc golf course. MM4.11-1 would ensure that the disc golf course hole is Impact4.11-1 to less-than-significant levels, are permanently relocated back to the official disc golf course. hereby incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation measures are necessary with the implementation of mitigation measure MM4.1 1-1. Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 2-9 Chapter 2CEQ4Findings TransportatiordTiralffic Impact 4.12-5. The project would not substantially increase In order to address safety concerns related to exiting the project Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or roadway hazards. site, mitigation measures have been identified that would alterations in the project, which would reduce eliminate potentially unsafe movements. These measures would Impact4,12-5 to less-than-significant levels, are also address the potential sight distance issue related to the uphill hereby incorporated into the project. No additional grade for southbound traffic on Goldenwest Street in this location. mitigation measures are necessary with the Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.12-4 and Code implementation of Code requirements CR4.12-4(a) requirements CR4.12-4(a) and CR4,12-4(b) would reduce and(b)and mitigation measure MM4.12-4. potential impacts associated with roadway hazards to a less-than- significant level. Utilities/Service Systems Impact 4.13-2. Implementation of the proposed project is Although the proposed project is not anticipated to exceed the Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or anticipated to be sufficiently served by existing water supply. existing water supply and is anticipated to be sufficieriffy served alterations in the project, which would reduce by existing water supplies, implementation of mitigation measure Impact 4.13-2 to less-than-significant levels, are MM4.13-1 would further ensure the availability of water supplies. hereby Incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation measures are necessary with the implementation of mitigation measure MM4.13-1, Impact4.13-5. Implementation of the proposed project The proposed project would involve the construction and Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or would include new stormwater treatment control BMPs, the operation of stormwater treatment control Best Management alterations in the project, which would reduce operation of which would not result in significant Practices (BMPs) that would be identified in a Stormwater Impact 4.13-5 to less-than-significant levels, are environmental effects. Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP),which would be a part of the hereby incorporated into the project. No additional project's Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP). The City has mitigation measures are necessary with the generallstandard conditions of approval to protect receiving water implementation of Code requirement CR4.13-1(a)and quality from short-and long-term Impacts of new development and (b). significant redevelopment, which include Code requirements must be in conformance with approved plans and specifications of appropriate agencies, operations would not be anticipated to result in significant environmental effects including, but not limited to,vectors or odors. 2-10 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statennent of Overriding Considerations Impact~`~~ ^Implementation~the proposed project could i CHAPTER 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives 3.1 INTRODUCTION The SEIR prepared for the Huntington Beach Senior Center considered seven separate alternatives to the proposed project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(a), the primary intent of an alternatives evaluation is to "describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project,which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives." This chapter describes the project objectives and design criteria used to develop and evaluate project alternatives presented in the Draft SEIR. A description of the alternatives compared to the proposed project and the findings regarding the feasibility of adopting the described alternatives is presented for use by the City in the decision-making process. 3.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES Implementation of the Huntington Beach Senior Center is intended to fulfill the following major objectives: ■ Implement the policies and development standards of the City's General Plan and Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO). • Create a development that is compatible with and sensitive to the existing land uses in the project area. ® Enhance the community image of Huntington Beach through the design and construction of high quality development consistent with the Urban Design Element of the City's General Plan. ■ Ensure adequate utility infrastructure and public services for new development. • Provide a centrally located senior recreation and human service facility within the City. ■ Build a new facility large enough to meet current and future demand as a result of an increasing senior population. ■ Provide a state-of-the art senior center designed for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational senior population with levels of service comparable to other cities in the area. ■ Mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible. t Provide an attractively designed building that maximizes safety and security of seniors, employees, and other users of the facility. E Utilize sound green-building practices during construction and operation of the facility by incorporating those standards found in the Cal Green Building Code, and, as feasible, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System to maximize Huntington Beach Senior Center SEIR Findings of FacVStatement of Overriding Considerations 3-1 Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives efficiencies and demonstrate the City's commitment to responsible leadership in the area of sustainable development 3.3 SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES The range of feasible alternatives was selected and discussed in a manner to foster meaningful public participation and informed decision-making. Among the factors that were taken into account when considering the feasibility of alternatives (as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6[f][11) were environmental impacts, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, regulatory limitations, jurisdictional boundaries, and attainment of project objectives. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(a), the SEIR need not consider an alternative whose effects could not be reasonably identified, whose implementation is remote or speculative, or one that would not achieve the basic project objectives. The analysis includes sufficient information about each alternative to provide meaningful evaluation, analysis and comparison with the proposed project. 3.4 PROJECT ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS The following is a description of the alternatives evaluated in comparison to the proposed project,as well as a description of the specific economic, social, or other considerations that make them infeasible for avoiding or lessening the impacts. The City finds that the adoption of any of the alternatives' to the project is infeasible. The reasons for each finding are provided following the description of the alternative,and are further described in the Draft SEIR. 3.4.1 Huntington Beach Senior Center Alternatives As shown below and in Chapter 6 (Alternatives to the Proposed Pro)ect) of the Draft SEIR, seven alternatives were evaluated in comparison to the proposed project. The environmental advantages and disadvantages of each of these alternatives are described. The alternatives that were selected for analysis include: j as Alternative 1: (No Project/Continuation of Uses Allowed by fisting General. Plan and Central Park Master Plan)—consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(3)(C), this alternative assumes the development level articulated in the City's Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central Park (Central Park Master Plan) (1999),which envisioned development of a portion of a "low intensity recreation area,"which would include family picnic shelters,barbeques, a tot lot, a restroom building, an access road from Goldenwest Street, and a parking lot Because the Central Park Master Plan proposed the recreation area as a program on a total of 16 acres, not all of these elements are likely to be present on the 5-acre project site, and the specific locations of the proposed uses ate interchangeable; therefore, this analysis assumes development of the most intensive of these uses, namely, the access road, parking lot, restrooms, tot lot, and some open space. e Alternative 2: Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration—This alternative assumes a reduced intensity and revised configuration of the project elements on the same 5-acre project site. Linder this alternative, the proposed senior center would be reduced by about one third (15,000 square feet [sf]), and would include a 30,000 sf structure, reoriented north/south and located at the southeastern corner of the project site. 3-2 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Aitemadves ® Alternative 3: Central Park Alternative Site (Northwest Corner of )Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street)--This alternative assumes development of a 45,000 sf senior center on another site within Central Park. The general configuration of the site would be maintained. Direct access to the parking lot would be provided by curb cuts on Goldenwest Street and Ellis Avenue as identified in the 2006 Huntington Beach Senior Center Feasibility Study (LPA 2006). Nevertheless,this alternative would maintain a similar flow of traffic to the proposed project. ® Alternative 4: Kettler School Alternative Site--This alternative assumes that the 38,412 sf of existing development on the vacant 9.5 acre Kettler School site would be reused and modified to accommodate the Huntington Beach Senior Center. The Kettler School site is located at 8750 Dorsett Drive,m the southeast portion of Huntington Beach.The southern 5-acre turf portion of this site, south of the extension of Stillwell Drive,is subject to a deed restriction that a portion of the site be used for school or parks and recreation purposes. Under this Alternative, the 5-acre area would continue to be developed with the existing softball fields. Circulation on the site would remain consistent with existing conditions, with vehicular access and parking provided from Dorsett Drive. Acquisition of the site would have to be negotiated with the school district for j purchase or lease. im Ahernative 5: Park View School Alternative Site—This alternative assumes that 45,000 sf of an existing 56,837 sf building on the 12-acre site Park View school site would be reused and modified to accommodate the Huntington Beach Senior Center.The Park View school site located at 16666 Tunstall Lane in Huntington Beach is owned by the Ocean View School District.The District has historically retained ownership of their properties,electing to lease the land for alternate purposes. As such,under this Alternative,it is assumed that the site would be leased from the District by the City. Existing athletic fields located on the site would remain with implementation of this alternative. Existing access to the site from Goldenwest Street,identified as a major arterial street and Heil Avenue, identified as a primary arterial street in the City's General Plan would remain with implementation of this alternative. ® Alternative 6: Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site—Under this alternative, the 45,000 sf senior center would be located on a portion of the 27-interior acres of the 40-acre Magnolia Tank Farm site. This site is located on the west side of Magnolia Street, between Bermuda Avenue on the north and the Huntington Beach Channel on the south. The site was formerly used for oil storage,but is no longer operational. ® Alternative 7: The Cove Alternative Site—Under this alternative, the 45,000 sf senior center would be located on a portion of the 9.9-acte,undeveloped site located at 7301 Garfield Avenue at the northeast corner of Garfield Avenue and Gothard Street. Access to the site is currently provided from Gothard Street but could be provided from either, or both, Gothard Street or Garfield Avenue. The existing zoning (Specific Plan No. 9, Holly-Seadiff Specific Plan) and General Plan designation(Residential Medium Density)would need to be changed to allow for the proposed use. The Cove site would requite remediation on a portion of the site and further study and investigation would be required to determine the level of contamination and proper remediation actions. 0 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Evaluation Three additional alternatives were initially considered but were found to be infeasible. These included: No Project/No Development Alternative, Rodgers Senior Center, and Satellite Senior Centers. The No Project/No Development Altemative represents the status quo, or maintenance of the project site in its Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 3-3 Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives current state. The site would remain as an underused parcel of land adjacent to the Central Library and would provide no state-of-the-art improvements, in a central location, to meet current and projected needs for recreation and community services for senior citizens in the City. Implementation of the No Project/No Development Alternative would not meet any of the project objectives, as no new uses would be developed. The second alternative that was rejected as infeasible would provide a new state-of-the-art senior center on the site of the existing Rodgers Senior Center. However, due to the known site constraints, lack of available funding to accommodate a new development on this site (costs would be much greater because j a subterranean parking facility would be needed), and because this would not provide a centrally-located senior center within the City, this alternative was rejected from further analysis. Further, this alternative may not be in compliance with the City Zoning Code, in terms of site coverage, building height and setbacks,and may require a variance. The Satellite Senior Center alternative suggests development of multiple, smaller-scale senior centers throughout the City. Construction of small-scale centers could accommodate a limited number of facilities, available activities, and patrons at each site, and would also preclude a central focal point for seniors to meet within the City. Instead, most patrons would utilize the nearest facility; thereby reducing the important opportunities for larger social gatherings and networking. Each site location would have differing environmental constraints. Compared to the proposed project,multiple centers would not have the flexibility to provide for a aide variety of uses simply due to size constraints at each location. In addition, the construction and operation of multiple centers would have a greater potential for cumulative environmental impacts. Further, the City does not own all of the nine sites evaluated in the Feasibility Study, which could lead to acquisition costs that the City would not be able to fund. Therefore,this alternative was rejected from further analysis. Lastly, Alternative Sites such as vacant school sites, the former Orange County Transfer Station, and vacant commercial buildings were investigated but determined to be infeasible. The City identified and reviewed twelve closed school sites within the Huntington Beach, Ocean View, and Westminster School Districts that could potentially be used for a proposed senior center. Of the twelve school sites, three sites were available. for use; Kettler School (Huntington Beach School District), LeBard School (Huntington Beach City School District) and Park View School (Ocean View School District). All three sites have zoning and land use designations that would allow for a senior center facility. As described above under Alternatives to the Project, the Kettler School (#4) and Park View (#5) sites are being analyzed as Alternatives to the proposed project. However, based on a qualitative analysis by Urban Crossroads (the EIR traffic consultants), use of the LeBard School site for the proposed senior center has been determined to be infeasible as a result of the site's location in a single-family residential neighborhood where access from an arterial roadway is not readily available and access could not be constructed from an arterial. The remaining nine closed school sites identified are not available and therefore, could not be accomplished in a reasonable amount of time. In addition, the remaining school sites may not help reduce project impacts. Therefore, ten of the alternative school sites were rejected from further analysis. The former Orange County Transfer Station is currently zoned and has a General Plan land use designation of Industrial requiring an amendment to the City's Zoning Map and General Plan Soil 3-4 Huntington Beach Senior Center FIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives contamination and biological impacts are likely on this site, unlike for the proposed project. As such,the site was rejected from further analysis. As a result of the economic recession, a number of large vacant, commercial buildings (primarily grocery stores) have become available for use. The feasibility of using the vacant grocery store building(s) for a new senior center facility is low due to the incompatibility of a park or recreational use in a commercial zone, as well as a potential incompatibility of the use with other existing tenants of the shopping centers. Additionally,reuse of existing, readily available,revenue-generating commercial properties for a park and recreational use does not make great financial sense, especially in light of the economic recession that has made these buildings available. Further on the financial front,the acquisition of such a commercial space may not economically feasible for the City. As such, this alternative has been rejected from further analysis. Alternative 1: No Project,/ Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Central Park Master Plan Alternative The No Project/Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Central Park Master Plan Alternative assumes the development level articulated in the City's Central Park Master Plan (1999), which envisioned development of a portion of a "low intensity recreation area," which would include family picnic shelters, barbeques, a tot lot, a restroom building, an access toad from. Goldenwest Street, and a parking lot Because the Central Park Master Plan proposed the recreation area as a program on a total of 16 acres, not all of these elements are likely to be present on the 5-acre project site, and the specific locations of the proposed uses are interchangeable; therefore, this analysis assumes development of the most intensive of these uses, namely, the access road, parking lot, restrooms, tot lot, and some open space. The No Project/Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Central Park Master Plan Alternative would result in substantially less development compared to the proposed project, as no habitable structures other than the restrooms are proposed under this alternative. Implementation of this alternative would not achieve any of the project objectives listed for the City of Huntington Beach, since the development of a senior center facility would not occur. This No Project/Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Central Park Master Plan Alternative would result in fewer impacts to aesthetics, air quality, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise, recreation,transportation and utilities. This alternative would result in similar impacts on biological resources, cultural resources,geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and public services and would not result in impacts that would be greater than the proposed project. While this alternative may result in a reduction of most environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project. Findings The City hereby finds that the No Project/ Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Master Plan Alternative is infeasible for the following environmental, economic, social, and other considerations: Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of FacVStatemert of overriding Considerations 3-5 i Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives ® Would not provide a centrally located senior recreation and human service facility within the City ® Would not build a new facility large enough to meet current and future demand as a result of an increasing senior population • Would not provide a state-of-the art senior center designed for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational senior population with levels of service comparable to other cities in the area • Would not provide an attractively designed building that maxi sizes safety and security of seniors, employees, and other users of the facility. • Would not utilize sound green-building practices during construction and operation of the facility by incorporating those standards found in the Cal Green Building Code and, as feasible, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System to rnaximi�e efficiencies and demonstrate the City's commitment to responsible leadership in the area of sustainable development. IM Alternative 2: Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration Alternative The Reduced Project/Altemative Configuration Alternative assumes a reduced intensity and revised configuration of the project elements on the same project site. Under this alternative, the proposed senior center would be reduced by about one third(15,000 sf, and would comprise a 30,000 sf structure, reoriented north-south and located at the southeastern corner of the project site. Screening vegetation separating the senior center from Goldenwest Street and from the disc golf course would be provided. Wide,paved walkways and patios would follow the northern and western perimeters of the center. Under the Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration Alternative, although the structure would be smaller than the proposed project, the senior center would be more than double the size of the existing Rodgers Senior Center. However, this alternative would be constructed on a smaller scale within the same project area than the proposed project. This alternative would not achieve the proposed project objectives of building a new facility large enough to meet current and future demands of a growing senior population, or provide a state-of-the art senior center designed for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational senior population with levels of service comparable to other cities in the area,to the extent of the proposed project. The Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration Alternative would result in reduced impacts to air quality, hydrology and water quality,noise, transportation and utilities than the proposed project due to its reduced density. This alternative would result in similar impacts on aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, land use, public services and recreation, and would not result in impacts that would be greater than the proposed project. While this alternative may result in a reduction of most environmental impacts,it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project. Findings The City hereby finds that the Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration Alternative is infeasible for the following environmental, economic, social.,and other considerations: 3-6 Huntington Beach Senior Center E1R Findings of Fact,/Staternent of Overriding Considerations Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives M Would not build a new facility large enough to meet current and future demand as a result of an increasing senior population s Would not provide a state-of-the art senior center designed for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational senior population with levels of service comparable to other cities in the area Alternative 3: Central Park Alternative Site (Northwest Corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street) The Central Park Alternative Site assumes development of the proposed senior center at an alternate site located at the northwest corner of Goldenwest Street and Eli, Avenue, approximately 1,200 feet south of the proposed project site. The general configuration of the site would be maintained. Direct access to the parking lot would be provided by curb cuts on Goldenwest Street and Ellis Avenue as identified in the 2006 Huntington Beach Senior Center Feasibility Study.Nevertheless,this alternative would maintain a similar flow of traffic as the proposed project. The setback from Goldenwest Street would be the same as under the proposed project, and additionally, a setback from Ellis Avenue would be provided and would be identical to the setback from Goldenwest Street. In all other physical and operational respects, this alternative would remain the same as under the proposed project. The alternative site is occasionally used by the equestrian center for larger shows and storage throughout the year. Therefore, although the site is presently undeveloped, development of this alternative would reduce the existing recreational opportunities that are present. The Central Park Alternative would reduce many of the impacts, either equal to or less than the proposed project,with the exception of noise,which would result in a greater less than significant impact than the proposed project. This alternative would eliminate the significant and unavoidable cumulative impact identified for the proposed project relating to the visual degradation of undeveloped open space, while achieving all of the project objectives. Since no other alternative analyzed would achieve all of the stated project objectives, while reducing impacts and eliminating the identified cumulative impact, of its reduced intensity, the City finds that Central Park Alternative Site is considered to be the environmentally superior alternative. However, implementation of this alternative would not achieve any the project objectives goal to mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible. The Central Park Alternative Site would result in fewer impacts to aesthetics and land use. This alternative would result in similar impacts on air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, public services, recreation, transportation and utilities. This alternative would result in greater noise impacts than the proposed project. Findings The City hereby finds that the Alternative Site is infeasible for the following environmental, economic, social,and other considerations: ■ Would not mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 3-7 Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives M Alternative 4: Kettler School Alternative Site The Kettler School Alternative Site is located at 8750 Dorsett Drive in the southeast portion of Huntington Beach. The site was the former Kettler Elementary School which closed in 2005. The site is currently developed with 38,418 sf of building area, an approximately 28-space surface parking lot, and paved areas, with the development located on the northern approximately 4.5 acres of the 9-acre site. The southern approximately 5 acres of the site is developed with grass athletic fields, including three softball diamonds. This alternative assumes that the existing vacant 38,412 sf building would be reused and modified to accommodate the senior center facility and the existing surface parking lot and portions of the existing paved areas would be modified to provide approximately 192 parking spaces. This site is located in a single family neighborhood, and is bound to the west and east by single family homes, to the north by Dorsett Drive and single family homes,and to the south by the Edison Community Center and Park. The athletic field portion of the site,located south of Stillwell Drive,is subject to a deed restriction that requires the site to be used for school or parks and recreation purposes.As such, the existing use of the grass athletic field area for softball fields would remain with implementation of this alternative. As the Kettler School Alternative Site would not require building construction and would be located on a previously developed site, this alternative would reduce construction related impacts associated with the proposed project. Additionally, use of this site as a senior center is permitted under the site's current zoning (Public/Semi Public) and general plan land use designation (Public) and is compatible with the adjacent Edison Community Center and Park, and would therefore not require amendments to the City's zoning code or General Plan. Additionally, the site is a closed school site with no current use leasing the building. The Ketder School site was specifically identified in the Parks suit filed against the City. While this alternative may result in a reduction of environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project. Kettler School Alternative Site would result in reduced impacts to aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, recreation, and utilities when compared to the proposed project. This alternative would result in similar impacts on land use and public services. While this alternative would result in impacts that ate reduced when compared to the proposed project,it would result in greater impacts than the proposed project on air quality,noise and transportation. Findings The City hereby finds that the Kettler School Alternative Site is infeasible for the following environmental, economic,social,and other considerations: IN Would not provide a centrally located senior recreation and human service facility within the City. • Would not utilize sound green-building practices during construction and operation of the facility by incorporating those standards found in the Cal Green Building Code and, as feasible, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System to max;mi�e efficiencies and demonstrate the City's commitment to responsible leadership in the area of sustainable development. • Would not mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible- 3-8 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact,/Statement of Overriding Considerations Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives E Alternative 5: Park View School Alternative Site The Park View School Alternative assumes that 45,000 sf of an existing 56,837 sf building on the 12-acre site would be reused and modified to accommodate a senior center facility. The existing Park View School is located at 16666 Tunstall Lane, bound to the west and north by single- and multi-family residential uses; to the east by industrial uses; and to the south by the Murdy Community Center. The site, formerly the home of Park View School is developed with 56,837 sf of building area, surface parking lots, paved areas, and grass athletic fields that include four baseball diamonds utilized by Ocean View Little League and two activity fields. The athletic field portion of the site would remain with implementation of this alternative. The Park View School site would reduce construction related impacts associated with the proposed project, as this alternative would not require building construction and would be located on a previously developed site. Additionally,use of this site as a senior center is permitted under the site's current zoning (Public/Semi Public) and general plan land use designation (Public) and is compatible with the adjacent Murdy Community Center and would not require a zone change or General Plan amendment (GPA). Additionally, the site is a closed school site with no current use leasing the building. Further, this site is easily accessible from Goldenwest Street and Heil Avenue. While this altemative may result in a reduction of environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project. Park View School Alternative Site would result in reduced impacts to aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, and recreation when compared to the proposed project This alternative would result in similar impacts to geology and soils, land use, public services and utilities when compared to the proposed project While this alternative would result in impacts that ate less than or similar to the proposed project, it would result in greater impacts than the proposed project on air quality,noise and transportation. Findings The City hereby finds that the Park View School Alternative Site is infeasible for the following environmental, economic, social,and other considerations: ® Would not utilize sound green-building practices during construction and operation of the facility by incorporating those standards found in the Cal Green Building Code and, as feasible, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System to maximize efficiencies and demonstrate the City's commitment to responsible leadership in the area of sustainable development. ® Would not mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible. Alternative 5e Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site. The Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site assumes the 45,000 sf senior center would be located on a portion of the 27-acre former Magnolia Tank Farm. The Magnolia Tank Farm site is located on the west side of Magnolia Street between Bermuda Avenue and Banning Avenue,bound to the north by a former landfill;to the east by Magnolia Avenue and across Magnolia Avenue by single-family residential uses;to the south and west by the Huntington Beach Flood Channel and across the Huntington Beach Flood Huntington Beach Senior Center£IR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 3-9 Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives Channel by wetlands (southwest) and by industrial uses (west).The site was formerly used for oil storage, but is no longer in operation and is developed with three oversized oil tanks connected to each other by pipelines. The general surface area is covered mostly with dirt Trees and green space line the eastern edge of the project boundary along Magnolia Street providing a visual buffer of onsite uses from passersby on Magnolia Street. The Magnolia Tank Farm site would reduce construction and operational noise impacts associated with the proposed project, as the site is bound to the north by undeveloped land; to the west by the Huntington Beach Flood Channel, land that was formerly used for oil storage that is no longer operational, and wetlands; to the south by wetlands and the Huntington Beach Flood Channel; and to the east, across Magnolia. Avenue by single-family residential uses. The site would be easily accessible from Magnolia Avenue, an arterial roadway in the City. Additionally, use of this site as a senior center is permitted under the existing zoning (Public/Semi Public) and general plan land use designation (Public) and would not require a zone change or GPA. Because the site is no longer operational, it would be available for acquisition and development but would require demolition of the existing oil tanks. While I this alternative may result in a reduction of environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site would result in fewer impacts to aesthetics and recreation when compared to the proposed project This alternative would result in similar impacts on air quality, cultural resources, geology and soils, land use, public services, transportation and utilities when compared to the proposed project. While this alternative would result in impacts that are less than or similar to the proposed project,it would result in greater impacts than the proposed project to hazards and hazardous materials,hydrology and water quality,and noise. Findings The City hereby finds that the Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site is infeasible for the following environmental, economic,social,and other considerations: ® Would not provide a centrally located senior recreation and human service facility within the City • Would not mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible Alternative 7: The Cove Alternative Site The Cove Alternative Site includes construction of a 45,000 sf senior center on a portion of the 9.9-acre, undeveloped site at the northeast corner of Gothard Street and Garfield Avenue.The site is bound to the north and east by single-family residential uses; to the south by multi-family residential uses across Garfield Avenue; and to the west by industrial uses across Gothard Street. The general surface area is covered mostly with patches of grass and shrubs. This alternative site is located at the intersection of two arterial roadways (Gothard Street and Garfield Avenue), and access is currently provided from Seagate Drive via Promenade Parkway. The Cove Alternative Site has a central location in the City and the site is vacant This alternative site is located at the intersection of two arterial roadways (Gothard Street and Garfield Avenue),and access is currently provided from Seagate Drive via Promenade Parkway.However, the site is zoned Holly Seacliff 3-10 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Chapter Findings Regarding Project Alternatives Specific Plan and has a General Plan designation of Residential Medium Density Residential, and implementation of this alternative would require a Zoning Map and GPA. In addition, the current ! property owners are interested in a land swap with the City for the existing Rodgers Senior Center site. The Rodgers Senior Center site has an existing deed restriction for use of the site as a public park and recreational facility. The land swap would require the removal of the deed restriction on the existing senior center site to allow development of that property for non-recreational uses.A land swap involving City owned property would be subject to voter approval, pursuant to Huntington Beach Charter Section 612. While this alternative may result in a reduction of environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project The Cove Alternative Site would result in reduced impacts to aesthetics, biological resources, and recreation. This alternative would result in similar impacts on cultural resources,geology and soils,public services and utilities when compared to the-proposed project While this alternative would result in impacts that are less than or similar to the proposed project, it would result in greater impacts than the proposed project on air quality,hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality,land use, noise and transportation. Findings The City hereby Ends that The Cove Alternative Site is infeasible for the following environmental, economic,social,and other considerations: Would not mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible i Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 3-11 CHAPTER 4 Statement of Overriding Considerations 4.1 INTRODUCTION CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 states: (a) CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects,the adverse environmental effects may be considered"acceptable." (b)When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final SEIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened,the agency shall state in writing the specific reason to support its actions based on the final SEIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record- (c)If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. The City of Huntington Beach (City) proposes to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations regarding the significant cumulative aesthetic impact of the proposed project. Although all project level impacts are reduced to less-than-significant levels,this section describes the anticipated economic, social, and other benefits or other considerations of the proposed project to support the decision to proceed with the project even though one identified cumulative impact is not mitigated to a less-than-significant level. 4.2 SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE CUMULATIVE IMPACT The City is proposing to approve the proposed project,with revisions to reduce environmental impacts, and has prepared an SEIR required by CEQA. Even with revisions in the project,the following impact is unavoidable because it has been determined that no feasible mitigation is available. Refer to Chapter 2 (CEQA Findings) for further clarification regarding the impact listed below. Aesthetics Given that the project would modify land that is currently undeveloped, the character of Central Park would be altered,which—would result in a cumulatively considerable impact Landscaping and open space would be provided, which would enhance the site's visual contribution to the surrounding park lands, and the project would not appear out of character when compared with surrounding land uses. However, the increase in development intensity of the project site, when compared with current uses, contributes incrementally to the visual degradation of the area in terms of reducing the amount of undeveloped open space unthin Central Park.This would be considered a significant cumulative impact Huntington Beach Senior Center SEIR Findings of FacVStatement of Overriding Considerations 4-1 i Chapter 4 Statement of Overriding Considerations 4.3 FINDINGS The City has evaluated all feasible mitigation measures and project revisions with respect to this cumulative aesthetic impact (see Chapter 2 [CEQA Findings]). The City has also examined a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project (see Chapter 3 [Findings Regarding Project Alternatives]). Based on this examination, the City has determined that because of its alternative location, the Alternative Central Park Site Alternative is considered to be the environmentally superior alternative. Several of the seven alternatives listed above would potentially result in less significant environmental impacts than the proposed project. The Kettler School Alternative Site, Park View Alternative Site, Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site and the Cove Alternative Site were found to result in greater impacts than the proposed project. The City finds these seven alternatives infeasible and less desirable than the proposed project and has rejected these alternatives from further consideration because they would not achieve the environmental, economic, social, and other considerations outlined in Chapter 3 (Findings Regarding Project Alternatives). 4.4 OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Specific economic, social,or other considerations outweigh the cumulative aesthetic impact stated above. The reasons for proceeding with the proposed project, even though one identified cumulative impact is not fully mitigated to a less-than-significant level,are described below. Proposed Project Benefits The proposed project would provide a new, centrally located state-of-the-art senior center that would be large enough to respond to the changing needs of the population and simultaneously meet the unique developmental needs and diverse interests of the City's senior residents. 1. Development of the proposed project would allow the City to serve a higher percentage of its senior population with levels of service comparable to other cities in the area. 2. The proposed project emphasizes compatibility and sensitivity to the existing uses surrounding the site and would include a variety of sustainable features, such as bioswales, drought-tolerant landscaping, waterless urinals, roofing mate6als, and installation of low-flush water devices. The City is actively pursuing the feasibility of including additional features that would bring the building closer to LEED certification. 3. The project will maintain and enhance the community image of Huntington Beach through the design and construction of high quality development consistent with the urban Design Element of the City's General Plan. 4-2 Huntington Beach Senior Center E1R Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations PUBLIC HEARING 15. Approve Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002, General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R) for the Huntington Beach Senior Center Project Planning Commission and Staff Recommended Action: A) Certify Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements by adopting Resolution No. 2012-18, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, Certifying the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2007041027) for the Huntington Beach Senior Center Project;" and, B) Approve General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 by adopting City Council Resolution No. 2012-19, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 (Senior Center Project);" and, C) Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R) with findings and suggested conditions of approval; and, D) Approve CEQA Statement of Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations. 21 Speakers Approved 5-2 (Shaw, Boardman no) Motion to continue meeting past 11:00 PM Approved 7-0 ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS 16. Consideration of Main St. and Ellis Ave. Intersection Modification Concept Development Recommended Action: Direct staff to develop the project concept, identify an appropriate funding source and include the costs of processing consideration of the project in the upcoming FY 2012/13 budget. Approved 7-0 ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION 17. Approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3938 amending Chapter 7.12 of the Huntington Beach Municipal Code relating to Miscellaneous Animal Care and Control by prohibiting the sale of dogs and cats by a retail commercial establishment City Council/PFA Regular Meeting April 16, 2012 -7- Council/Agency Meeting Held: 41116 D Deferred/Continued to: Approved ❑ Co i onail Approve ❑ Denied t,fCit erk'V,ignatur Council Meeting Date: April 16, 2012 Department ID Number: PL12-006 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning and Building SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 2012-18 approving the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 07-002; Adopt Resolution No. 2012-19 approving General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 11-004 and approve Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 07-039(R) for the Huntington Beach Senior Center Project Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and an appeal by Council Member Boardman of the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R) and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 07-002 for the Huntington Beach Senior Center project. The project involves development of a new one-story senior center up to 45,000 square feet on a five-acre undeveloped site in Central Park. Council Member Boardman filed an appeal due to concerns regarding inconsistencies between the Final Master EIR for the Sports Complex and the proposed senior center Subsequent EIR as well as a question regarding the boundary of the equestrian center in Central Park. The Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the City Council certify the Subsequent EIR and approve the project entitlements because the Subsequent EIR has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), adequately analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project, identifies project alternatives, provides mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts, responds to the court ruling related to the CEQA lawsuit, and the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan. Financial Impact: Not applicable. Planning Commission and Staff Recommended Action: Motion to: A) Certify Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements by adopting Resolution No. 2012-18, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, Certifying the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2007041027) for the Huntington Beach Senior Center Project." (ATTACHMENT NO. 1). Item 15. - 1 HB -368- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 B) Approve General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 by adopting City Council Resolution No. 2012-19, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 (Senior Center Project)" (ATTACHMENT NO. 2). C) Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R) with findings and suggested conditions of approval (ATTACHMENT NO. 3). D) Approve CEQA Statement of Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations (ATTACHMENT NO. 4). Planning Commission Action on January 24, 2012: THE MOTION MADE BY DELGLEIZE, SECONDED BY RYAN, TO CERTIFY SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 07-002 BY APPROVING RESOLUTION NO. 1659 CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: DELGLEIZE, MANTINI, PETERSON, RYAN NOES: BIXBY, FARLEY, SHIER BURNETT ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE THE MOTION MADE BY RYAN, SECONDED BY PETERSON, TO APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-004 AND FORWARD DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION, APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 07-039(R) WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND APPROVE CEQA STATEMENT OF FINDINGS OF FACT WITH A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: DELGELIZE, MANTINI, PETERSON, RYAN NOES: BIXBY, FARLEY, SHIER BURNETT ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE MOTIONS PASSED Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1 . "Continue Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002, General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R) and direct staff accordingly." 2. "Deny Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002, General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039 (R) with findings for denial." HB -369- Item 15. - 2 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 Funding for the senior center project was identified to come from park and recreation fees assessed for the Pacific City project, an approved mixed use development project within the Downtown Specific Plan area. However, the Pacific City project has a new ownership entity and the original developer is no longer proceeding with the project. At this time no alternative funding source for the senior center project has been identified. The Council may desire to continue the project and defer any final decision until a funding source for the senior center project is identified. Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Property Owner: City of Huntington Beach Location: 18041 Goldenwest Street (5-acre site southwest of the intersection of Goldenwest Street/Talbert Avenue in Central Park) Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 07-002 represents an analysis of potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of an up to 45,000 square foot senior recreation facility on a 5-acre site within Huntington Central Park (further described below). The SEIR also analyzes a proposed General Plan Amendment, which involves incorporating the Central Park Master Plan into the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan and updating the Central Park Master Plan of Uses to change the 5-acre senior center site from a low intensity to high intensity recreation area. The SEIR provides a discussion of impacts by issue area and provides mitigation measures, where necessary to reduce environmental impacts. Specific issue areas discussed in the SEIR include: aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic and utilities and service systems. An analysis of alternatives to the proposed project and long-term implications resulting from project implementation are also provided. The SEIR consists of two volumes. Volume 1 is the Draft Subsequent EIR and Technical Appendices that were circulated for a minimum 45-day public review period. Volume 2 is titled the Final Subsequent EIR and includes comments received during the public review period, responses to those comments and text changes to the Draft SEIR (Volume 1) to clarify or correct information in response to comments or identified as necessary by staff. These volumes are referenced as Attachment No. 5 to this staff report. Appeals Court Decision Clarification The SEIR indicates that the court ruled in favor of the City on the petitioner's cause of action regarding use of the Quimby fees from Pacific City. However, it should be clarified that the City argued that the issue was not timely raised. The court sided with the City on this point Item 15. - 3 HB _370_ REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 and agreed that the issue was time-barred. This clarification is not substantive to the environmental analysis required pursuant to CEQA and does not affect the analysis or conclusions in the SEIR. General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 11-004 involves incorporating the Central Park Master Plan into the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan and updating the Central Park Master Plan of Uses to change the 5-acre senior center site from a low intensity to a high intensity recreation area and accommodate the senior center development (Attachment No. 2). The General Plan Amendment is proposed in response to a court ruling from a lawsuit filed challenging the adequacy of the City's CEQA review and project approval (Attachment No. 7). The General Plan Amendment would ensure that the proposed senior center project is consistent with the Central Park Master Plan and General Plan Recreation and Community Services Element. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 07-039(R) represents a request to construct and operate up to a 45,000 square foot senior recreation facility on a 5-acre site in Central Park pursuant to Chapter 213.06 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO). The conditional use permit is also necessary because the project is located on a site with a grade differential greater than three feet and includes a gated entrance to the site. No change to the previously approved CUP request is proposed. The 5-acre project site is located within the 343-acre Huntington Central Park and generally located southwest of the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue, between the disc golf course, which is at a higher elevation, and the Shipley Nature Center. The 5-acre project site consists of the senior center building, parking lot and open space area (Attachment No. 6). The approximately 45,000 square foot building will include a community hall/dining room, group exercise, fitness and dance rooms, multi-use classrooms, a kitchen, a social lounge and administrative offices. The outdoor open area includes a patio with a decorative trellis, an expansive lawn, a garden, a fountain, benches and a natural meadow. There are a minimum of 227 parking spaces including spaces for shuttles and City vehicles in the parking area. Landscaping is provided throughout the site and consists of a mix of California native and non-native drought tolerant vegetation. Ingress and egress to and from the site is proposed via a planned access driveway with entry gate at the existing Goldenwest Street/ Talbert Avenue intersection. An existing traffic signal at this location will be modified for traffic to enter and exit the project site. Programming & Hours of Operation The proposed senior center will operate much like the existing Rodgers Senior Center operates today. The new center will be used for a variety of recreational programs and activities serving the City's seniors, although the facility will be accessible to all residents of the City. Primary uses include: recreation and social services, Senior Outreach Program (transportation, meals, counseling/visitation), and public meetings or receptions when not occupied by primary functions. HB -371- Item 15. - 4 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 Proposed hours of operation are: Day Proposed Regular Hours Classes & of operation Activities Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. — 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. — 10:00 p.m. Saturday & Sunday None 8:00 a.m. — 10:00 p.m. Special Events in Multi-Purpose Room (w/ reservations) Sunday through Until 10:00 p.m. Thursday Friday & Saturday Until 12:00 a.m. With reservations, special events such as wedding receptions or public meetings are proposed to be held in the community hall when it is not being used for recreation or social programs. The current senior center also allows reservations for special events and currently rents the center to a church on Sundays. B. BACKGROUND: The senior center project (EIR No. 07-002 and CUP No. 07-039) was initially approved by the City Council in 2008, but subsequent legal challenges invalidated the approvals necessitating a new approval process. Specifically, the Court ruled that the City violated its General Plan by failing to modify the General Plan to accommodate the senior center project in the Central Park Master Plan. The Court also determined that the City violated CEQA by failing to consider a reasonable range of alternatives, including closed school sites that became available after the Draft EIR was prepared but before the Final EIR was certified. The Court required the City to set aside the project approvals (EIR and CUP) and process a General Plan Amendment and conduct further environmental analysis. In July 2011, the City Council voted to set-aside the previous approvals and directed staff to prepare a Subsequent EIR and process the General Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit entitlements. The Subsequent EIR includes analysis of the proposed General Plan Amendment and four additional alternative sites as well as additional analysis of potential impacts due to loss of open space Citywide as a result of utilizing all Quimby fees from the Pacific City project for the proposed senior center project. The 2007 EIR has also been updated where appropriate to reflect current existing conditions. C. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The Planning Commission certified the SEIR and approved the project at a public hearing on January 24, 2012. Comments at the hearing were received from nine individuals; three spoke in support of the project, and six spoke in opposition. The comments in support of the project generally referenced the need for a new senior center and belief that the project would be an improvement to the existing conditions of the project site. Comments opposing the project generally referenced concerns regarding noise and lighting and the belief that open space should be preserved. One commenter presented a Powerpoint presentation Item 15. - 5 HB -372- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 detailing perceived deficiencies in the 1999 Master EIR and suggested corrections to a table and mitigation measure in the 1999 Master EIR, which was certified in 1999. Additionally, the attorney representing the petitioner of the lawsuit spoke in opposition to the project citing concerns raised in letters that were submitted prior to the Planning Commission meeting (Attachment No. 9). D. APPEAL: On February 2, 2012, Council Member Boardman filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the SEIR and conditional use permit (Attachment No. 10). The appeal letter cites Council Member Boardman's belief that there are inconsistencies between the Final Master EIR for the Sports Complex and the SEIR for the senior center as well as a question regarding the boundary of the equestrian center. E. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The following analysis includes a discussion about the General Plan Amendment, Land Use Compatibility, the Subsequent EIR, Alternatives to the Proposed Project, and the issues raised in the appeal: Central Park Final Master EIR/ Sports Complex and Equestrian Center Boundary. No changes from the previously approved CUP request are proposed. However, since the court ruling required the City to set-aside the project approval, the project must go through the CUP approval process again. In addition, the court ruling also determined that the City's action was not in conformance with the General Plan by allowing the senior center on an area designated for low-intensity uses on the Central Park Master Plan. Therefore, a General Plan Amendment is proposed to respond to the court ruling and ensure that the project would be consistent with the Central Park Master Plan and thus, the General Plan. General Plan Amendment The senior center site is part of a larger 14-acre area designated on the 1999 Central Park Master Plan for low intensity recreational uses. It was envisioned that the area would be developed with passive park uses and include such amenities as a tot lot, benches and tables, a picnic shelter, restrooms and parking. Vehicular access to the passive park area would be via a planned driveway at the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue. Because the senior center facility would be considered an active recreation use and the intensity of development on the project site would be increasing over its current designation, the Central Park Master Plan must be amended for the 5-acre senior center site. The site would be re-designated from a low intensity area to a high intensity area. Furthermore, as the Central Park Master Plan is referenced in the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan, a new Central Park Master Plan exhibit is proposed to be incorporated into the Recreation and Community Services Element. The proposed change from a low intensity recreation area to a high intensity recreation area would not cause a significant reduction in the overall amount of passive/low intensity recreation area in Central Park. In fact, the change in intensity for the 5-acre site represents a 1.5% reduction in passive recreation area in Central Park and is negligible when xB -373- Item 15. - 6 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 considered Citywide. The change would not affect the ability of the City to meet the current "parkland per capita" ratio of five acres per 1,000 residents and would result in no difference in the current ratio of 5.25 acres per 1,000 residents. Furthermore, in the context of the undeveloped 14-acre low intensity area, the development footprint of the building is approximately one acre, which constitutes less than 10 percent of the total undeveloped area. Pursuant to the Planning Commission's approved findings for approval, the project, including the proposed General Plan Amendment, would be consistent with other elements of the General Plan. Land Use Compatibility The proposed project, as modified by suggested conditions of approval and the mitigation measures contained in SEIR No. 07-002, is consistent with the applicable General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations of Open Space — Park (OS-P) and Open Space — Park and Recreation (OS-PR), respectively. Although the proposed project would result in the development of a new senior center on existing open space, the project will be compatible with the established recreational land use pattern in the area, specifically existing community facilities such as the Central Library and Sports Complex adjacent to the proposed project site. Within this context, the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding parkland. The nearest adjacent residences are located approximately 800 feet west of the project site. Mitigation measures incorporated in SEIR No. 07-002 ensure that residences in the vicinity will not be detrimentally impacted. In addition, the proposed project will add a senior recreation facility on land currently designated for recreational uses and conforms to the OS- PR zoning designation. The change in intensity on the site represents a less than significant reduction in passive open space in Central Park. Additionally, there are other parks in the vicinity of the project site with passive recreation area such that the reduction is even less significant from a cumulative Citywide perspective. To integrate the project with the natural setting of the Shipley Nature Center and existing passive parkland west of the project site, substantial landscaping is proposed throughout the site, including surrounding the entire perimeter of the project site. The proposed landscaping includes species that are currently found at Shipley Nature Center, the Sports Complex and the passive parkland to the west. As discussed in the SEIR for the project, the integrity of environmental resources on and surrounding the site will be maintained or mitigated. EIR Overview The SEIR provides a detailed analysis of potential impacts associated with the proposed project. It is intended to serve as an informational document for decisions to be made by the City and responsible agencies regarding the project. The issues discussed in the SEIR are those that have been identified in the course of extensive review of all potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the project. The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the project are addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives. A summary of key issues and mitigation measures as a result of the subsequent environmental impact report process is provided below. A complete listing of the recommended mitigation measures is provided in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program provided as Attachment No. 12. Item 15. - 7 xB -374- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 Scope of Subsequent EIR Analysis The Subsequent EIR includes analysis of the proposed General Plan Amendment and four additional alternative sites as well as additional analysis with respect to potential impacts due to loss of open space as a result of utilizing Quimby fees for the proposed senior center project. The SEIR also updates baseline conditions and includes a new greenhouse gas emissions section since it was not required in the 2007 EIR. Subsequent EIR No. 07-002 analyzed 14 impact areas listed below. ® Air Quality N Aesthetics • Biological Resources M Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils M Hazards and Hazardous Materials ® Greenhouse Gas Emissions Land Use and Planning • Hydrology and Water Quality Noise ■ Recreation Public Services ® Traffic e Utilities & Service Systems Although each impact area was updated from the 2007 EIR as necessary, several impact areas and sections required more extensive revisions to address the issues raised in the court ruling. The most substantial changes from the previous (2007) EIR to the Subsequent EIR were in the following areas: ® Project Description: added General Plan Amendment description, update of project objectives, discussion on court ruling, description of four new alternative sites (described in more detail below) ® Land Use and Planning: General Plan Amendment analysis ■ Recreation: analysis of Citywide impacts to parkland due to use of Quimby fees from the Pacific City project for the senior center project and not acquisition of parkland ■ Alternatives: analysis of four new alternative sites ® Greenhouse Gas Emissions: new analysis not included in 2007 EIR No impacts in the areas of Agricultural Resources, Mineral Resources and Population and Housing were determined during the scoping process for the 2007 EIR. None of the changes in the project description, alternative sites, or baseline conditions would result in a change to this determination; as such, no analysis is provided in the Subsequent EIR in these impact areas. Similar to the 2007 EIR, all project impacts would result in less than significant impacts or less than significant impacts with implementation of code requirements and mitigation measures. The Subsequent EIR determined one significant and unavoidable cumulative impact would occur in the area of aesthetics as a result of the project. This significant and unavoidable cumulative aesthetic impact was also identified in the 2007 EIR. Alternatives to the Proposed Project CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 requires a reasonable range of alternatives to be evaluated that would attain most of the project objectives while avoiding or substantially reducing any of the significant environmental impacts caused by the project. The City HB -375- Item 15. - 8 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 selected potential project alternatives based on the CEQA Guidelines and the language of the court ruling. Seven alternatives were evaluated in the Subsequent EIR. The seven alternatives included the three alternatives analyzed in the 2007 EIR as described below: ® No Project/Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Master Plan — Analyzes development on the site as a "low intensity recreation area" with the access driveway, parking lot, restrooms, tot lot and open space. ■ Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration — Analyzes a reduction in the size of the development with a 30,000 square foot building re-oriented to the southeast corner of the site. ® Alternative Central Park Site — Analyzes the alternative site location of the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street. Additionally, in response to the court ruling, four additional alternatives were selected for evaluation in the Subsequent EIR including: • Kettler School Site — Analyzes use of an existing 38,418 square foot school building at the closed Kettler School site located at 8750 Dorsett Drive, west of Magnolia Street between Atlanta and Hamilton Avenues in the southeast area of the City. This site is specifically referenced in the court ruling. • Park View School Site — Analyzes use of 45,000 square feet of an existing 56,837 square foot school building at the closed Park View School site located at 16666 Tunstall Lane, east of Goldenwest Street between Heil Avenue and the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Flood Control Channel. This site was included because it is a closed school site that is currently available for use with a centrally located building large enough to accommodate the proposed senior center. ■ Magnolia Tank Farm Site — Analyzes demolition of the existing empty oil storage tanks and ancillary site improvements and construction of a 45,000 square foot senior center on a portion of the existing 27-acre former Magnolia Oil Tank Farm located on the west side of Magnolia Street at Banning Avenue in the southeast area of the City. At the time the City was evaluating other sites, this site's property owner was pursuing a Coastal Development Permit to remove the tanks. In addition, the site already has proper General Plan and zoning land use designations for the proposed senior center. ® The Cove Site — Analyzes construction of a 45,000 square foot senior center on a portion of the 9.9-acre undeveloped site located at the northeast corner of Gothard Street and Garfield Avenue. This site was included because the property owner, Chevron Land and Development Co., contacted the City to discuss a potential land swap for the current senior center site, which was deeded to the City by Chevron (then Standard Oil Corp.). The site was also chosen due to its central location in the City and undeveloped status. Other alternatives such as upgrading the existing Rodgers Senior Center, using vacant commercial buildings, other closed school sites, and multiple small satellite senior centers were considered but rejected as infeasible. Specifically, nine of the closed school sites were rejected because they are currently leased for other uses and, as such, would not be available to accommodate the senior center development in a reasonable amount of time. Le Bard School was available, but further evaluation rendered this site infeasible because the adverse environmental impacts would be greater than the project. The Alternatives Item 15. - 9 HB -376- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 analysis concluded that Alternative 3: Alternative Central Park site would be considered the environmentally superior alternative. Central Park Final Master EIR/ Sports Complex The Central Park Master Plan was adopted by the City Council in December 1997. The Central Park Master Plan identified existing developed park uses as well as a proposed Sports Complex and several concepts for long-term development of the remaining undeveloped areas of Central Park. In 1999, the Central Park Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) was certified by the City Council. The MEIR analyzed program-level and project-level elements of approximately 157 acres of undeveloped and developed areas of Central Park. The senior center site was analyzed at a program-level as part of a larger 16- acre area (current calculations have since refined this area to 14 acres) designated for low- intensity recreation uses envisioned to be developed with a tot lot, turf, a picnic shelter, restrooms, barbecue area and parking. However, none of these elements were implemented. The 1999 Final Master EIR discusses that there are 72 acres of non-native grassland in Central Park within the low intensity recreation area, the midden area/urban forest/trailhead, the Semi Active Recreation area, and the Talbert Lake Meadow. The Central Park Master Plan envisions approximately 36.6 acres of the non-native grassland areas to be developed or otherwise improved for a particular use. These uses included approximately 17.2 acres within the midden/urban forest/trailhead area, eight acres in the semi-active area and approximately 11.4 acres within the low-intensity recreation area. Since the Final Master EIR was adopted, the City has implemented or proposed approximately 16.9 acres of uses within non-native grassland areas. Central Park Non- Acreage To Be Actual Acreage Amenities Native Grassland Developed Per Developed/Proposed Area 1999 Master Plan Semi Active Area 8 4.6 Therapeutic Riding Center Low-Intensity Area 11.4* 7 Senior Center; Shipley Nature Center Temporary Lot; Access Driveway Midden/Urban 17.2 5.3 Urban Forest (includes Forest/Trailhead proposed future expansion) Total 36.6 16.9 *The 11.4 acres of low intensity area was based on a total overall acreage of 16 for the area. The Central Park Master Plan would therefore leave 35.4 acres of non-native grassland undeveloped (i.e. preserved). Another 5.8 acres of ruderal/bare land within the Sully Miller Lake Group facility area would also be preserved for conservation and enhancement supporting non-native grassland habitat. These preserved areas total 41.2 acres and would provide the area for raptor foraging mitigation for the Program level elements of the Master Plan (approx. 36 acres) as well as the actual amenities that have been developed or are xB -377- Item 15. - 10 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 proposed to be developed including the senior center (approx. 16.9 acres). It should be noted that the Sports Complex was not considered raptor foraging habitat and its development did not require mitigation for enhancement of raptor foraging habitat. The proposed General Plan Amendment would amend the current Central Park Master Plan as adopted by the City Council to accommodate the senior center development. The revised Central Park Master Plan (Attachment No. 2) also identifies the proposed permanent location of the Therapeutic Riding Center. No other changes to the Central Park Master Plan are proposed. Equestrian Center Boundary The equestrian center occupies a 25-acre area south of the disc golf course on the west side of Goldenwest Street in Central Park. Recently, the equestrian center has been utilizing existing lease area for a pasture that was not previously used. However, the lease area did not expand and no changes to the existing lease area were made. In addition, the City surveyed the equestrian center lease area and determined that the area is 25 acres consistent with the terms of the lease (Attachment No. 11). This issue does not affect the senior center project entitlements or SEIR. F. SUMMARY The Planning Commission and staff are recommending certification of SEIR No. 07-002 because: - It has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act; - Responds to the court ruling and addresses all specific environmental issues raised by the court with respect to loss of parkland Citywide, project alternatives and the proposed General Plan Amendment; - Adequately addresses the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project; and - Identifies project alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with General Plan policies. Additionally, the Planning and staff are recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit based on the suggested findings and subject to the suggested conditions of approval. The proposed project furthers General Plan goals, objectives, and policies that encourage the establishment of uses that support the needs of existing and future Huntington Beach residents when compatible with and sensitive to adjacent uses. In addition, the project would provide a centrally located senior recreation facility large enough to meet current and future demand of an increasing senior population in the City of Huntington Beach. The project has been designed to comply with all applicable zoning regulations of the OS-PR zoning designation. Finally, the proposed project entitlements and SEIR comply with the court ruling as a result of the lawsuit challenging the project's approval and CEQA compliance as described in Attachment No. 7. Item 15. - 11 HB -378- REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 Environmental Status: The project's potential environmental impacts are analyzed and discussed in Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002. Although the project results in an adverse cumulative impact to the environment that cannot be mitigated or avoided, the City Council may still approve the project if a Statement of Overriding Considerations is approved. CEQA requires decision makers to balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the City may consider the adverse environmental effects acceptable. In this particular case, staff and the Planning Commission believe the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the adverse impact to aesthetics. The cumulative adverse aesthetic impact is a result of the overall loss of undeveloped open space in Central Park. That being said, approval of the project will provide a new state-of-the-art, environmentally sustainable senior center designed for innovative programming to meet the needs of a multi-generational senior population. The project also provides a centrally located senior center that will be large enough to meet current and future demand of an increasing senior population in the City of Huntington Beach. Development of the project also results in a temporary increase in employment opportunities due to project construction. Prior to any action on General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R), it is necessary for the City Council to review and act on Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002. Staff is recommending that Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002 be certified as adequate and complete with Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Strategic Plan Goal: Improve the City's infrastructure Attachment(s): 1. City Council Resolution No. 2012-18, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California, Certifying the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2007041027) for the Huntington Beach Senior Center Project" 2. City Council Resolution No.2012-19, "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 (Senior Center Project)" 3 Suggested Findings and Conditions of Approval — Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039R 4 CEQA Statement of Findings of Fact with Statement of Overriding Considerations—SEIR No. 07-002 5. Final Subsequent EIR No. 07-002, includes SEIR, SEIR Appendices, Response To Comments and Text Changes (not attached — previously provided under separate cover, available for review at City Hall, the Central Library and on the Cit 's website 6. Project Plans, dated October 17, 2007 7. City Council RCA, dated July 5, 2011, Setting aside previous approvals for the Senior Center Project (CUP 07-039 and EIR 07-002 HB -379- Item 15. - 12 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 4/16/2012 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL12-006 8. Planning Commission Staff Reports, dated January 24, 2012 9. Comment Letters Submitted After Distribution of January 24, 2012 Planning Commission Packet 10. Appeal of the Planning Commission's Certification of SEIR No. 07-002 and CUP No. 07- 039(R), dated February 2, 2012 11. Equestrian Center Legal Description 12. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 13. PowerPoint Presentation Item 15. - 13 HB -380- ATTACHMENT # 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH#2007041027) FOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER PROJECT WHEREAS, Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002, State Clearinghouse #2007041027, ("SEIR") was prepared by the City of Huntington Beach ("City") in response to Parks Legal Defense Fund, et al. v. City of Huntington Beach, et al. to address the environmental implications of the proposed Huntington Beach Senior Center Project(the "Project"). ® On April 2, 2007, a Notice of Preparation/Initial Study for the Project was prepared and distributed to the State Clearinghouse, other responsible agencies, trustee agencies and interested parties. s After obtaining comments received in response to the Notice of Preparation, and comments received at the public scoping meeting held on April 19, 2007, the City completed preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") and filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse on September 13, 2007. ® The Draft EIR was certified by the City Council on February 4, 2008. ® Pursuant to the court requirement that the original certification of the EIR be set aside, a Draft Subsequent EIR was completed and circulated for public review and comment from September 15, 2011 to October 31, 2011 and was available for review at several locations including City Hall, the Huntington Beach Central Library, and the City's website; and Public comments have been received on the Draft Subsequent EIR, and responses to those comments have been prepared and provided to the City Council as a section within a separately bound document entitled "Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Huntington Beach Senior Center" (the "Responses to Comments"), dated December 2011; and The Public Resources Code 21092.5(a) requires that the City of Huntington Beach provide a written proposed response to any public agency that commented on the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report, and the Response to Comments included in the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report satisfies this provision; and The City Council held a public meeting on the Subsequent EIR on April 16, 2012, and received and considered public testimony. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: 1 12-3275.001/78547 Resolution No. 2012-18 1. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15132 and Section 15162, the Final Subsequent EIR for the Project is comprised of the Draft Subsequent EIR and Appendices, the comments received on the Draft Subsequent EIR, the Responses to Comments (including a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft Subsequent EIR), the Text Changes to the Draft Subsequent EIR (bound together with the Responses to Comments) and all Planning and Building Department Staff Reports to the Planning Commission and City Council, including all minutes, transcripts, attachments and references. All of the above information has been and will be on file with the City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Building, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. 2. The City Council finds and certifies that the Final Subsequent EIR is complete and adequate in that it has identified all significant environmental effects of the Project and that there are no known potential environmental impacts not addressed in the Final Subsequent EIR. 3. The City Council finds that although the Final Subsequent EIR identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the Project is approved, all significant effects which can feasibly be mitigated or avoided have been mitigated or avoided by the incorporation of Project design features, standard conditions and requirements, and by the imposition of mitigation measures on the approved Project. 4. The City Council finds that the Final Subsequent EIR has described reasonable alternatives to the Project that could feasibly obtain the basic objectives of the Project (including the "No Project" Alternative), even when these alternatives might impede the attainment of Project objectives and might be more costly. Further, the City Council finds that a good faith effort was made to incorporate alternatives in the preparation of the Draft Subsequent EIR and that a reasonable range of alternatives was considered in the review process of the Final Subsequent EIR and ultimate decisions on the Project. 5. The City Council finds that no "substantial evidence" (as that term is defined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15384) has been presented which would call into question the facts and conclusions in the Subsequent EIR. 6. The City Council finds that no "significant new information" (as that term is defined pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5) has been added to the Subsequent EIR after circulation of the Draft Subsequent EIR. The City Council finds that the minor refinements that have been made in the Project as a result of clarifications in the text of the Draft Subsequent EIR do not amount to significant new information concerning the Project, nor has any significant new information concerning the Project become known to the City Council through the public hearings held on the Project, or through the comments on the Draft Subsequent EIR and Responses to Comments. 7. The City Council finds that the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program establishes a mechanism and procedures for implementing and verifying the mitigation measures pursuant to Public Resources Code 21081.6 and hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the Project prior to or concurrent with Project implementation as defined in each mitigation measure. 12-3275.001/78547 2 Resolution No. 2012-18 8. The City Council finds that the Final Subsequent EIR reflects the independent review and judgment of the City of Huntington Beach City Council, that the Final Subsequent EIR was presented to the City Council, and that the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final Subsequent EIR prior to approving General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R). 9. The City Council finds that the Final Subsequent EIR serves as adequate and appropriate environmental documentation for the Project. The City Council certifies that the Final Subsequent EIR prepared for the Project is complete, and that it has been prepared to respond to the California Court of Appeals ruling, dated December 13, 2010 and in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and CEQA Guidelines. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of P,pri 1 , 201 2 Mayor REVIE D APPROVED: INIT ATE AND APPROVED: �'I�nager Director of Planning and Building APPROVED AS TO FORM: r � City Atto ey 12-3275,001/78547 3 Res. No. 2012-18 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on April 16, 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr NOES: Shaw, Boardman ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Ci lerk and ex-officio lerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTAC H M E N T #2 RESOLUTION NO. 2012-1 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-004 (SENIOR CENTER PROJECT) WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 proposes to amend the Recreation and Community Services Element of the City's General Plan to re-designate the 5-acre senior center site as a high intensity recreation area on the Central Park Master Plan of Uses and incorporate the Central Park Master Plan of Uses into the Recreation and Community Services Element as Figure RCS-2. The amendment also includes modifying text of the Recreation and Community Services Element to correct the acreage of Central Park and update the senior center language to reflect the 2006 Measure T vote and reference the senior center project in Central Park. One other change includes an update to Table RCS-1 to identify the senior center as a recreational amenity in Central Park. Pursuant to California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 11-004;and recommended approval of said entitlement to the City Council; and Pursuant to California Government Code, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, after notice duly given, held a public hearing to consider General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and, The City Council finds that said General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 is necessary for the changing needs and orderly development of the community, is necessary to accomplish refinement of the General Plan, and is consistent with other elements of the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the real property that is the subject of this Resolution (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") consists of five acres and is general located southwest of the intersection of Talbert Avenue and Goldenwest Street between the disc golf course, which is at a higher elevation and the Shipley Nature Center, and is more particularly described in the legal description and map attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B", respectively, and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein. 12-3173/75938 1 Resolution No. 2012-19 SECTION 2: That General Plan Amendment No. 11-004, which amends the General Plan Recreation and Community Services Element to reflect changes to and incorporate the Central Park Master Plan is hereby approved. The Director of Planning and Building is hereby directed to prepare and file an amended Recreation and Community Services Element. A copy of said Recreation and Community Services Element, as amended, shall be available for inspection in the Planning and Building Department. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of Apri 1 , 2012. Mayor 11=4 REVI AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ci Ma ager 7Nity Attorney 1 � INI IATE AND APPROVED: Director of Planning and Building ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Legal Description Exhibit B: Map Exhibit C: General Plan Changes 12-3173/75938 2 Resolution No.2012-19 Resolution No.2012-19 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Section 34 of Township 5 South, Range II West, in the Rancho Las Bolsa Chica, in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said County, described as follows: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34, THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION, SAID EAST LINE ALSO BEING THE CENTERLINE OF GOLDENWEST STREET AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 92-1084, RECORDED IN RECORD OF SURVEY BOOK 138, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SOUTH 00°16'29" WEST 91.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST 142.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00°16'36" WEST 465.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST 465.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" EAST 97.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" EAST .96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" EAST 368.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" EAST 466.40 FEET; BEGINNING. Resolution No.2012-19 Resolution No.2012-19 EXHIBIT B Senior Center in Huntington Central Parr r MpiMA _ - if - {` �� _ - 'k` - r h ' .,,.,C" ,Lim i���T-• ��� - - Resolution No.2012-19 Resolution No.2012-19 TECHNICAL, SYNOPSIS The City of Huntington Beach's recreational opportunities consist of parks, golf courses, and coastal amenities, including approximately 9.5 miles of coastal parks and beaches.' This first section summarizes the Technical Background Report's existing conditions discussion. The existing condition summary is followed by the Recreation and Community Services Goals,Objectives,Policies, Implementation Programs, and Implementation Matrix. A. NON-COASTAL PARKS AND RECREATION 1. Existing Parks and Recreation Facilities Huntington Beach contains 75 parks which encompass 758.61 acres. These include 10 mini parks totaling 4.58 acres, 52 neighborhood parks totaling 177.54 acres, 10 community parks totaling 168.33 acres, and three regional parks(Huntington Central Park,Blufftop Park and OC Regional Weider Park)encompassing 407.90 acres. Regional facilities adjacent to Huntington Beach include Sunset Aquatic Park in Seal Beach (95 acres/260 boat slips), Mile Square Park in Fountain Valley(632 acres), and Bolsa Chica Ecological Preserve in Orange County(300 acres).' The future parks to be developed are as follows: a. Four neighborhood parks will be developed with the Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan. b. The proposed Harriet M. Weider Regional Park will link the Central Park with the Bolsa Chica State Beach, The 106 (approximate) acre passive park will provide tot lots, bicycle and pedestrian trails,equestrian trails,and a wetlands interpretive center. c. The five (5) acre Gibbs Park has a natural eucalyptus grove. This grove, which covers approximately 60 percent to 70 percent of the site, is a passive park with interpretive elements. The remainder of the park will provide traditional neighborhood park amenities. d. The 30 acre Bartlett Park with the historic Newland House, will be further developed, although the City has not determined what facilities will be established. Irby Park, an 11-acre site, has three developed acres and the City intends to develop two additional acres. The remaining six acres will be sold and the funds will be used for other park development. Although City Council has authorized surplusing the additional acreage, it has not been sold due to the extreme peat condition of the soil. e. Huntington Central Park is 3—0 343 acres of which 2-20 266 acres are developed with uses such as the Central Library, Shipley Nature Center and the 45-acre Sports Complex. The r-emaining 150 ages-are ineluded in the '�z Est Plan of Uses in Gentr-al-Park. The remaining 77 acres are planned for various passive and active recreation uses as depicted in the Central Park Master Plan of Uses (refer to FiEure RCS-2). The Central Park Master Plan of Uses is periodically reviewed and updated as proiects and improvements are implemented and new proiects are proposed to be incorporated. 2. Community Centers Edison Community Center (21377 Magnolia Street) and Murdy Community Center (7000 Norma Drive) located in community parks, are the focal points for the majority of the recreation programs offered by the City of Huntington Beach. Instructional classes, tennis classes, youth sports, and adult softball are among the programs conducted at the centers. Inside the facilities are meeting halls, and game rooms with pool, 'The information in this paragraph reflects General Plan Amendment No. 10-002 (Sunset Beach Annexation) adopted by the City Council on October 18,2010. The Annexation is pending approval OF A Local Coastal Program Amendment by the California Coastal Commission. III-RCS-1 Resolution No.2012-19 table tennis, foosball, video games, and other table games. Outside areas include tennis, basketball, and volleyball courts, softball/athletic fields, racquetball/handball, tot play areas, horseshoe pits, and picnic areas. The centers also host extracurricular activities for many of the local schools and civic organizations. 3. Seniors' Center The Rodgers Seniors' Center, located at 1706 Orange Avenue, provides a variety of free services to the City's elderly population including: employment information, housing assistance, Golden State Senior Discount Program, utility tax exemption credit, paramedic assistance and Vial of Life Program, postal alert, voter registration, surplus commodities distribution, Handy Crafters Club, Singing Goodtimers, and other special activities. Aging of the general population resulting in an increase of the senior population will increase demand for senior services. The City should assess possibilities f building ., new f,.;uty in the fiAur- e ...e inereasedde ffh +a. 1n 2006, the City's voters approved a new senior center in Central Park subject to entitlement and environmental clearances. The new senior center would be larger and more centrally-located than the current senior center and able to accommodate the existing and future demands of the City's growing senior population. The new senior center is included in the Central Park Master Plan of Uses(Figure RCS-2)in an area designated for high intensity recreation uses. Huntington Beach operates an Outreach Center (1718 Orange Avenue) adjacent to the Rodgers Seniors' Center. The Outreach facility contains approximately 2,624 square feet. This Center houses offices and workrooms for ten employees and numerous volunteers. Outreach services for the elderly population are coordinated from this facility. These support services are: Home delivered meals Telecare Case management CHERISH(Community Helpers engaged in Restoring Transportation and Improving Senior's Home) Information and Referral Bright Outlook Newsletter Counseling/support groups On a daily basis, staff members leave the Center and engage in fieldwork which comprises making visits to older adults' homes and linking them to other senior service providers in the community. Outreach serves 400 older adults on a monthly basis. 4. Golf Courses The two publicly owned golf courses are 1) Driftwood Course an 11-acre, 9-hole pitch `n' putt course, located on Pacific Coast Highway, and 2) Meadowlark Golf Course, a 96 acre, 18-hole course, located on Graham Street. In addition, the Seacliff Country Club golf course is an 18-hole, 140-acre private course located on Palm Avenue. Driftwood Golf Course is operated by a concessionaire who contracts with Mayer Corporation. The City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency is the owner of the property,but has leased the land to the Mayer Corporation. Meadowlark Golf Course is on City-owned land and is also run by a concessionaire who reports to the City of Huntington Beach. Both Golf Courses are open to the general public. 5. Huntington Beach City Gym and Pool The City Gym and Pool, located at 16th Street and Palm Avenue, offers indoor swimming, showers, volleyball and basketball courts, a recreation room, and meeting room. The 0.8 acre gym site is owned by the City of Huntington Beach. III-RCS-3 Resolution No.2012-19 � U V7 C � O it A OD OD N N f6 N N v OD N A Y 16 -6 •� O x t0 -0 O U- i m U +T+ d in 0 "O CU o °s ° v o v a v �i o 'U o � v v t y .Q a E v C N ° u ° v m E r > a T a v -2 - " T E -° E � c E v Y v 'c Cr 1s u E 'c v 3 v `0 v m m W 2 m -c ° Cr D T ° m � Q `u m v __ o 0 3 CU c °' o Q cc cc cc m U U U w ii �i C7 2 z O t1 N N N H > > Arevalos Park 1 2.58 Baca Park- 2 .14.35 Y _ n Bailey Park(formerly Seacliff#1) 3 0.59 Banning/Magnolia_Park 8 . ®_ Bartlett Park 5 27.73 ®1 Bauer.Park 6:" .04 Bluff Top Park 7 19.66 0 • . _ Bolsa View Park 8; 2 Booster Park 9 0.85 ® • Burke Park j0 2:50 e Bushard Park 11 2.38 ® _® Carr Park 12--10:72 Circle View Park 13 2.31 0 _ Clegg-Stacey Park -14 College View Park 15 2.70 ® ! _ Conrad Park 16 2 71_ ® 2 _ _ <, _. y Davenport Beach Park 17 0.46 Discovery Well-P ark 18� 6 60 Drew Park 19 2.28 ® 0 0 EaderPark =20 2 68 Edison Park 21 39.69 • • • • • 0 • 0 • 0 a Farquhar Park 22 3,52 Finley Park(formerly Seacliff#2) 23 0.56 Franklin Park 24` 1 52_ French Park 25 0.33 Gibbs Park �26" 6 83 ® Gisler Park 27 11.67 — Glen Vievv Park 28' 3.02 ® _ } _ ® =- Golden View Park 29 2.81 ® .- 0 Green Park, 30, 4.04 ® :_ Greer Park 31 10.44 • ® ® ! ® �.,. Harbour View Park` 32 _ r Haven View Park 133 2,95 ® 0 Hawes Park 34, Helme Park 35 2.02 _ ® ® i - Hope View Park 36 3 61 _ ?, ® __ ® _ Humboldt Beach Park 37 0.48 • CITY PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES (page 1 of 2) 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN ,Q—WC S 1 Resolution No.2012-19 � c v O v � v -0 •- o m x C LL i/ m 2 U N � n � T d v O -a u 3 m m 0 .N o U m m m CU •m m \ c O c m O Cr L 41 C O ` to C: N m d d F N LL L m E N N d L J v N G1 L •Q E '/� C N C O1 U 3 — > n -2 Y M — L E a1 3 y c 17 m M u r- E c a1 3 v ° u `m m ami m c o T `o „ m o u m a0i Y o 0 3 aci c v o 2 Q m m m 'm v v v iL LL C7 x Z 0 a, s m in in h x > > Huntington Central Park 38. 343.24 .x - ® ® Irby Park 39 10.91 Lake Park.i 40 4:75 Lake View Park 41 2.16 ® • Lamb Park, 42 :2.60 .. - • Lambert Park 43 3.50 Langenbeck Park. 44 -17:02 - .. - •_,_ _ ®_.®"= .- M Lark View Park 45 3.65 40 ® ® LeBard Park 46 -4.99 ®"=• � - ® Y 'E Manning Park_ 47 2.46 ! ® ® ®_ Marina Pat k 48---9 34 :� • ® ... • _ • • ". Marine View Park 49 2.96 ® • McCallen�Park k . 5.84 - , Moffett Park 51 2.38 ® A^ Mu rdy Park 52 .16..04 • ® ®j® -_ ®q Newland Park 53 2.94 • Oak View Park 54 1i31At Orange County Regional Park(Weider) 55 45.01 ® ® � Pat-tinson Park 56 3:51 Perry Park 57 1.88 ® ®_ Pleasant View Park 58 Prince Park 59 0.22 _ Robinwood Park 60 1.41. - Schroeder Park 61 2.37 Seabridge Park 62 3:91- ® . ®` •_ r. - _ Seeley Park 63 3.37 Sowers Park - 64 2:65 ® • ®; _ Sunset Beach Greenbelt Park 65 6.41 Sun View Park 66 __2.45 Talbert Park 67 5.44 Tarbox Park - 68 '�0:44 _ ® �-, Terry Park 69 4.81 • • Triangle Park " 70 1.11 Trinidad Park 71 0.75 • Wardlow Park Wieder Park 73 4.80 Worthy Park 74- 1133� 11th Street Beach Park 75 0.17 CITY PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES (page 2 of 2)CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN W uRC S Resolution No.2012-19 CENTRAL PARK MASTER FLAN OF VISES WAIT OF EXISTING M ALNTR E—� EA CILRY EVAANSION LNCLWDES THE— ADSGIT!ON Cf 4603.SQUAREFE \\ `e,Slatpr Ave fA1A1MRef�UL� Cli''P_PA9iTREtdP9D:.. E S 'AREA °® LAN�Se f MAINTE A E',YARD FACILITY=Lk tNCWDE-,--.i G $Q' D. .�s �a ENHANCED, I Flli1G•�REA _ ff IM ROWM•ENTS AND 'i ^'s.,�cd+ *L 1TILTATIC ' 5 acre ��.._..._.,�.- Senioenter rt� E r t TAIREPV LAKEf" High Intensity @SIST3N - MEADOW EXISTING r WPUY NATURE � +�} AJUL�bld➢wEATER, Recreation Area O :M�f$tC,OSiEA rW ENTLAZtE { 'too_ PLMOROUN'DOaR EXISTING '^EktSTif':.,^r. �r S 9-acre Low Intensity my �Tal �rt Ave Recreation Area € t _ ORTS r� w, Al - - NUNTI G TON tea: oi` „,Cf :Tr tSK 9T'',r y MANGE NGE CCU V L C 1W �5+ �"iURH TRA.N'SFEA S'eATICN W+ �es,, $Ti�tXI5,13KV". .y'SD946 V1V14�#Di C*S TsspS�17kifG1V� ve ..r ., tg1Y "'' • ' T PORT re�o® l�...�� a , 3©Gk, 0.409t 4 4 ;,���sRlki CiV URR FOREST ACCESS l �yW ie E VIEW HARRiEFM `';`" P �Iz�EIYM1I- 1 E,-TATES ri[ssSiLE ®._- . KARRER „x. � 41�5�A � ��ECR �1�! �+ � �� .�44SJ�hES � 11R z e PE4"ib�NAt � Pam. i;•I �A ' �� _ a $ ACCESS TO TRAIT UESTRt FrRQLiL Ellis Ave, i ,�h£STATES ;y 555 `� E ISYthNy mLrl.IWURPOSf TRAA ! p AREA 40INCTUDf MASSES W TREES- of VARIOUS SETECTETD SPECIES p EaGII INCLMS- ADE S14-11% PICN:G f FA01ITY 04 VJDES i ACCESS ROAD `a—fACIUTY 1t�GC..itLDES:.ACCE55 ROAD fRG,'N riLkia TARES.HITCKIt,*POST,3PCE 4A!CR$,AND � FROM WIS AVENUE,r.,R c""e,•,,° AWKUE,R€STROOM E01TYNG PLCNIIC SHELTER •4saUt' Y,�. ,OPE.td Tull,AND E45Fiil 3 LS OPEN`'t ARF AREAS,PAWING, FACILITY tNCLWD'SS:ACCESS ROAD FR+GbFh E11TS. -d OVUFL0'0W PARKIN: RESTRC�N L4�T,3f L4, ,AND,,f jTT L(YT gg�q�13�{�y G.,TCyT 4'4T.+4 a4f}rtC. Aii. — —FACD&INCLUDES-ACCESSP AVENUE,RESTKNM§E•UIMING,PARKING LOT SPACES,AN CEIBSfd@-x{A41ELl AIESUE) wiTH SIANDA TAL8ER5AVE1r1E8'fa G$NAPE�T RT} 0 MufSd I&N TW{T,R PAWNG SPACES .. STRtkY G iVE4 PARKING LOT, fKbMA g LR FtT dI sbCCE& : FTEtD .a!iT A #AE© 'Therapeutic Ft Rt3T & . `� �r lµ RidingCenter C&,C p mum" T.T.. , Ttif 6� "' ei CITY OF HUNTIN TON BEACH, CALIFORNIA * Proposed Figure RCS-2 Res. No. 2012-19 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, JOAN L. FLYNN the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on April 16, 2012 by the following vote: AYES: Harper, Dwyer, Hansen, Carchio, Bohr NOES: Shaw, Boardman ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 9P&J y Clerk and ex-offici Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California ATTACHMENT #3 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 07-039 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 07-039R: 1. Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039R to permit the construction and operation of up to a 45,000 square foot senior recreation facility will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. A SEIR that analyzed the project's potential to generate detrimental impacts on people and surrounding properties was prepared and concluded that, with mitigation, there are no significant project specific impacts. In addition, being that the project is located in Central Park, the closest adjacent residences are located approximately 800 feet west of the project site. One significant cumulative impact to aesthetics was identified in the SEIR and as such, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, which discusses the benefits of the project in relation to the cumulative impact, is required for approval of the project. 2. Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039R will be compatible with surrounding uses because it is consistent with the applicable General Plan Land Use and Zoning land use designations for the site. Although the proposed project will result in the development of a new senior center on existing open space, the project will be compatible with the established recreational land use pattern in the area, specifically existing community facilities such as the Central Library and Sports Complex adjacent to the proposed project site. Within this context, the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding parkland and is a permitted use within the General Plan and Zoning land use designations. The proposed project would add a senior recreation facility on land currently designated for recreational uses consistent with the revised Central Park Master Plan adopted as part of General Plan Amendment No. 11-004. The project will not result in a loss of parkland resulting in a deficiency Citywide. The proposed building features a design with architectural features that minimize the visual bulk and mass of the buildings and provides for compatibility with the surrounding parkland. The project complies with all of the requirements for development in the OS-PR zoning district and provides an adequate number of parking spaces. To integrate the project with the natural setting of the Shipley Nature Center and existing passive parkland west of the project site, substantial landscaping is proposed throughout the site, including surrounding the entire perimeter of the project site. 3. Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039R will comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, including the Open Space — Parks & Recreation zone permitted uses and minimum setbacks. Parking requirements are determined by the conditional use permit and are specific to the requested use. A sufficient number of parking spaces is provided for the project based on surveys of similar projects. 4. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039R will not adversely affect the General Plan. it is consistent with the Land Use Element designation of OS-P (Open Space - Parks) on the subject property. In addition, it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: Air Quality Element H13 -399- Item 15. - 32 PolicyAQ 1.8.3: Encourage developers to maintain the natural topography, to the maximum extent possible, and limit the amount of land clearing, blasting, grading, and ground excavation operations needed for development. The proposed project anticipates a balanced site with minor cut and fill operations during construction. Policy AQ 1.10.1: Continue to require the utilization and installation of energy conservation features in all new construction. As with all new buildings, the proposed project will be required to comply with the energy conservation standards of Title 24, which would ensure that there would be no wasteful or unnecessary use of energy. In addition, the project is pursuing sustainable design elements similar to those utilized in the development of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) buildings. Circulation Element Goal CE 2: Provide a circulation system which supports existing, approved and planned land uses throughout the City while maintaining a desired level of service on all streets and at all intersections. Objective CE 3.2: Encourage new development that promotes and expands the use of transit services. Policy CE 6.1.6: Maintain existing pedestrian facilities and require new development to provide pedestrian walkways and bicycle routes between developments, schools, and public facilities. Policy CE 6.1.7: Require new development to provide accessible facilities to the elderly and disabled. Policy CE 7.1.7: Continue to construct landscaped medians in existing major and primary arterial streets and continue to require the construction of landscaped medians in new developments. The proposed senior center project will be required to comply with the requirements of the ADA. The proposed project will also provide ADA access to the site via a pedestrian path north of the access driveway. The project includes parking spaces and a drop-off area for shuttle vehicles to provide senior transit services to and from the facility. The proposed project includes construction of a planned access driveway at the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue. The new access driveway includes modifying the existing traffic signal at the intersection and a proposed landscaped median. Finally, the proposed project would not contribute to a reduction in the level of service of surrounding streets and intersections resulting in a deficient circulation system. Environmental Hazards Element Item 15. - 33 HB -400- Policy EH 4.1.1: During major redevelopment or initial construction, require specific measures to be taken by developers, builders, or property owners in flood prone areas, to prevent or reduce damage from flood hazards and the risks upon human safety. Although the site is partially located in Flood Zone A, the project site is already a minimum of 4 feet higher than the base flood elevation at its lowest point. A flood elevation certificate will be required for the proposed project. Growth Management Element Goal GM 2: Ensure that adequate transportation and public facilities and public services are provided for existing and future residents of the City. The proposed project would provide a public facility to serve the expanding senior population in the City and be large enough to accommodate future demand. The proposed project does not result in any significant traffic impacts and adequate public facilities and services are available to serve the development. Hazardous Materials Element Policy HM 1.2.3: Support land use or developments adjacent to or within close proximity of sensitive uses, which do not utilize, store, handle, or contain hazardous materials and/or waste, and which would create an unsafe, unhealthy, or hazardous condition for adjacent uses. Construction and operation of the proposed senior center would not include the use of large quantities of hazardous materials, and any commonly used hazardous materials would be used and stored in accordance with applicable regulations. Implementation of the proposed project would not create an unsafe or hazardous condition for adjacent uses. Land Use Element Policy LU 4.2.1: Require that all structures be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City's building and other pertinent codes and regulations; including new, adaptively re-used, and renovated buildings. Policy LU 4.2.4: Require that all development be designed to provide adequate space for access, parking, supporting functions, open space and other pertinent elements. Policy LU 4.2.5: Require that all commercial, industrial and public development incorporate appropriate design elements to facilitate access and use as required by State and Federal Laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The proposed project will be constructed in accordance with existing laws and regulations, including the California Building Code, the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and any applicable State and federal law requirements such as ADA. In addition, the project is proposed to be in conformance with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and is not seeking any variances to deviate from the code requirements. Adequate access to and from the project site will be provided through the entrance at the Goldenwest Street/Talbert Avenue intersection. Sufficient parking will be provided on site HB -401- Item 15. - 34 for the senior center use and a recommended condition of approval would ensure that ADA parking spaces would exceed the minimum required. The site also maximizes open space through the provision of outdoor amenities such as a patio, a garden and a fountain courtyard area with over an acre of landscaped area. Recreation and Community Services Element Policy RCS 1.1.1: Provide leisure opportunities through programs and activities that serve the general population as well as the specialized needs of the disabled, children and elderly. Policy RCS 2.1.1: Maintain the current park per capita ratio of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons, which includes the beach in the calculation. Policy RCS 3.1.2: Provide a variety of amenities within recreation areas in order to accommodate persons with different interests. Policy RCS 3.1.7. Design recreational facilities to the accessibility requirements as specified in State and Federal laws such as the Americana with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards for accessibility. The proposed project is a senior recreation facility proposed to be developed in accordance with ADA standards. In addition, the project would provide accessible parking spaces exceeding ADA requirements. The senior center and associated amenities will provide the City with expanded recreational resources for a diverse senior population large enough to meet existing and future demand. The senior center will be accessible to all residents of the City of Huntington Beach and provide a needed community facility for the entire City. Although the proposed General Plan Amendment would re-designate the project site from a low intensity recreation area to a high intensity recreation area on the Central Park Master Plan, the project site would not result in a reduction in City parkland and the City's established "park per capita" ratio would be maintained in accordance with Policy RCS 2.1.1. Urban Design Element Goal UD I: Enhance the visual image of the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed project features an architectural design that will blend, to the extent possible, with the park setting of the surrounding area. Materials include an abundance of wood, glass, stone and stucco. The design also incorporates a variety of forms, wall planes, roof lines, offsets, exterior finish materials and decorative architectural elements such as a wood trellis patio and an outdoor fountain courtyard area. The proposed landscaping includes meadow grasses and native and non-native drought tolerant plants that are compatible with the landscaped areas of the passive park west of the project site, Shipley Nature Center to the north, and the Sports Complex to the east across Goldenwest Street. Utilities Element Objective U 1.2: Ensure that existing and new development does not degrade the City's surface waters and groundwater basins. Item 15. - 35 HB -402- Obiecfive U 1.3: Minimize water consumption rates through site design, use of efficient systems, and other techniques. Policy U 1.3.2: Continue to require the incorporation of water conservation features in the design of all new and existing uses such as the use of native plants, low flow toilets and water efficient appliances. Policy U_3.3.2: Where feasible, utilize natural overland flows, open channels, and swale routings as preferred alignments for components of drainage systems. Policy U 3.3.3: Require that new developments employ the most efficient drainage technology to control drainage and minimize damage to environmental sensitive areas. The proposed project includes bioswales and vegetated buffer areas to treat runoff from the proposed project's impervious areas. Implementation of BMPs and the project's directing of stonnwater flows through the park and Huntington Lake will ensure that project implementation would not adversely impact sensitive environments such as the Shipley Nature Center. Additionally, the project would comply with the City's Municipal Code to reduce water consumption and stormwater runoff. A final Water Quality Management Plan is required to be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works prior to grading permit issuance. Finally, the project will incorporate sustainable site development strategies and utilize water savings features to ensure compliance with City policies to maximize water conservation efforts. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 07-039R: 1. The project plans received and dated October 17, 2007 shall be the conceptually approved design with the following modifications. a. The gate located at the terminus of the access driveway shall be relocated to the south edge of the reconfigured "Tn intersection. b. The number of ADA parking spaces shall be increased to 20. Once the facility is operational, the number of ADA spaces may be revised as determined necessary by the Community Services Department. 2. The project shall strive to achieve LEED certification. A variety of sustainable features shall be used and may include (but are not limited to) those recommended by the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Program certification thttp://www.usqbc.or_ IDisplavPage.aspx?CategorylD=19) or Build It Green's Green Building Guidelines and Rating Systems (http://www.builditgreen.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=quidelines). 3. Prior to submittal for plan check, the final project design and landscape plans shall be consistent with those approved by the City Council on August 17, 2009. The final landscape plans shall incorporate a variety of tree, shrub and grass species that are currently planted at adjacent uses, including the Sports Complex, Shipley Nature Center and the passive park west of the project site. Meadow grasses shall be planted in the northwest corner of the project site and include species that occur at Shipley Nature Center consistent with the August 17, 2009 City Council approved plan. If the final plans substantially change from the August 17, 2009 Council approved plans, as determined by the Director of Planning and Building, the final project design and landscape plans shall HB -403- Item 15. - 36 require further review by the Design Review Board and approval by the Planning Commission at a non-public hearing. 4. At least 14 days prior to any grading activity, the applicant/developer shall provide notice in writing to property owners of record and tenants of properties within a 500-foot radius of the project site as noticed for the public hearing. The notice shall include a general description of planned grading activities and an estimated timeline for commencement and completion of work and a contact person name with phone number. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, a copy of the notice and list of recipients shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 5. A public ark element, approved by the Design Review Board, Director of Planning, and Director of Huntington Beach Art Center, shall be depicted on the plans. Public Art shall be innovative, original, and of artistic excellence; appropriate to the design of the project; and reflective of the community's cultural identity (ecology, history, or society). 6. The project shall comply with all mitigation measures adopted in conjunction with Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS CONDITION: The owner of the property which is the subject of this project and the project applicant if different from the property owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Huntington Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings, liability cost, including attorney's fees and costs against the City or its agents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City, including but not limited to any approval granted by the City Council, Planning Commission, or Design Review Board concerning this project. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and should cooperate fully in the defense thereof. Item 15. - 37 xB -404- ATTACHMENT #4 iin .4ii.- Item I5. - 38 HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER Findings of Fact/ Statement of overriding Considerations Prepared for City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department 2000 Main Street, Third Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 Prepared by ATKINS 12301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 430 Los Angeles, California 90025 January 2012 Item 15. - 39 HB -406- Contents CHAP=-I Introduction ...........................................................................................................1-1 CHAPTER2 CEQA Findings......................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Introduction.................................................................................... ...........................2-1 CHAPTER 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives...............................................................3-1 3.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................•.....3-1 3.2 Project Objectives...........................................................................................................3-1 3.3 Selection of Alternatives.................................................................................................3-2 3.4 Project Alternative Findings..........................................................................................3-2 3.4.1 Huntington Beach Senior Center Alternatives............................................3-2 CHAPTER 4 Statement of Overriding Considerations ...............................................................4-1 4.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Significant Adverse Cumulative Impact..................... 4-1 .................................................. 4.3 Findings.............................................................................................................................4-2 4.4 Overriding Considerations.............................................................................................4-2 Table Table 2-1 CFQA Findings for the Huntington Beach Senior Center................................................2-3 Huntington Beach Senior Center SEIR Findings of c^^+.c+-*—ment of Overriding Considerations H B -407- Item 15. - 40 CHAPTER 1 Introduction This document presents the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations that must be adopted by the City of Huntington Beach (City) pursuant to the requirements of Sections 15091 and 15093, respectively, of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) prior to the approval of the Huntington Beach Senior Center (proposed project). This document is organized as follows: Chapter 1 Introduction to the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. Chapter 2 Presents the CEQA Findings of the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SE1R),including the identified significant cumulative impact. Chapter 3 Presents the alternatives to the proposed project and evaluates them in relation to the findings contained in CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3). The City must consider and make findings regarding alternatives when a project would involve environmental impacts that cannot be reduced to a less-than-significant level, or cannot be substantially reduced,by proposed mitigation measures. Chapter 4 Presents a Statement of Overriding Considerations that is required in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 for significant impacts of the proposed project that cannot be mitigated to a less-than-significant level. The proposed project involves development of a new one-story multi-purpose senior center on undeveloped land in Central Park. The 5 acre development would comprise the senior center, parking areas, vehicular storage, outdoor common areas, and a service area_ Open space areas would consist of courtyards, gardens, and landscaping/planting pocket areas. Landscaping around the building and parking lot would be drought-tolerant,low water usage-type vegetation. A new access driveway planned at Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue for ingress/egress to the project site would be constructed with the proposed project. An existing traffic signal at this location would be modified for traffic to enter the project site.As Goldenwest Street is elevated above the site, an ADA ramp from the site to the intersection as well as from the OCTA bus stop located near the Goldenwest Street/Talbert Avenue intersection would be provided for pedestrian access. A total of 227 parking spaces would be provided including spaces for ADA parking and shuttle buses. Under the proposed project, no significant unavoidable impacts would occur on a project level. However, a significant cumulative impact would occur to aesthetics. In comparison to the alternatives analyzed against the proposed development, the City finds that the Alternative Central Park Site Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative. The following discretionary approvals by the City of Huntington Beach are required to implement the proposed project: ■ Conditional Use Permit Request—To permit construction of a senior recreation facility in Huntington Beach Central Park with a 3-foot grade differential. ■ Design Review approval (only required if substantial changes are made to existing design) �gton Beach Senior Center SEIR Findings of--- c--meet of Overriding Considerations 1-1 Item 15. - 41 HB -408- Chapter 1 Introduction ® Central Park Master Plan Amendment—Amendment to the Central Park Master Plan land use designation for the 5-acre project site from the current low-intensity designation to the proposed high--intensity designation. • General Plan .Amendment Recreation and Community Services Element—Amendment to the Recreation and Community Services Element of the City's General Plan to (1) identify the proposed project as the intended location of the proposed senior center; (2) increase the use intensity on this site from low-intensity to high intensity; and (3) incorporate the Central Park Master Plan into the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan. 1-2 Huntington Beach Senior Cente,"' -gs of Fact/Statement of Overriding Conside HB -409- Item 15. - 42 CHAPTER 2 CEQA Findings 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the potential impacts that were identified in the SEIR and the findings that are required in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15091. The possible findings for each significant and/or potentially significant adverse impact are as follows: (a) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which avoid, substantially lessen, or reduce the magnitude of the significant environmental effect as identified in the SEIR ("Finding 1"). (b)Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the findings. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency ("Finding 2"). (c) Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives in the SEIR ("Finding 3"). CEQA requires that the lead agency adopt mitigation measures or alternatives,where feasible, to avoid or substantially reduce significant environmental impacts that would otherwise occur as a result of a project. Project modification or alternatives are not required, however, where they are infeasible or where the responsibility for modifying the project lies with some other agency (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, subd. (a), [3]). Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines "feasible" to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." CEQA Guidelines Section 15364 adds another factor: "legal" considerations (see also Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors [Goleta I1] [1990] 52 Cal.3d 553, 565 [276 Cal. Rptr. 410]). Only after fully complying with the findings requirement can an agency adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Citizens for Quality Growth v. City of Mount Shasta [1988] 198 Cal.App.3d 433, 442, 445 [243 Cal. Rptr. 727]). CEQA requires the Lead Agency to state in writing the specific rationale to support its actions based on the Final SEIR and/or information in the record. This written statement is known as the Statement of Overriding Considerations. The Statement of Overriding Considerations provides the information that demonstrates the decision making body of the Lead Agency has weighed the benefits of the project against its unavoidable adverse effects in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse effects may be considered"acceptable." The California Supreme Court has stated that, "the wisdom of approving any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced" (Goleta 1I, 52 Cal.3d 553, 576 [276 Cal. Rptr.401]). gton Beach Senior Center SEER Findings of�-- '" -`-ment of Overriding Considerations 2-1 Item 15. - 43, HB -410- Chapter 2 CEQA Findings This document presents the City of Huntington Beach findings as required by CEQA, cites substantial evidence in the record in support of each of the findings, and presents an explanation to supply the logical step between the finding and the facts in the record (CEQA Guidelines Section 15091). Additional facts that support the findings are set forth in the Draft SEIR, the Final SEIR, staff reports to the Planning Commission,and the record of proceedings. Table 2-1 (CEQA Findings for the Huntington Beach Senior Center) summarizc the potentially significant impacts of the SEIR that were reduced to less-than-significant levels with mitigation as well as the significant cumulative impact identified, as currently proposed for certification and adoption of the proposed project. 2-2 Huntington Beach Senior Center GAR rin^iings of Fact/Statement of overriding Consid+ H B -4 11- Item 15. - 44 Chapter 2 CEQA Findings E 4: 111,MMME=o: Ul) 1 T b;�!1:T!!..,�,�,.--1" ,"1 .1.11_. L Ffi_ J Aesthetics Impact 4.1-3. Implementation of the proposed project would The micro-ecology of the site and adjacent open space areas Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or introduce new sources of light and glare into the project could result in potentially significant impacts on sensitive species alterations in the project, which would reduce vicinity from project lighting and activities. However, implementation of Impact 4.1-3 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby mitigation measures MM4.1-3(a) through (c) would reduce incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation impacts associated with onsite lighting as the lowest levels of measures are necessary with the implementation of illumination would be required, and lighting on site would not Mitigation Measures MM4.1-3(a)through (e). remain on at all times during the nighttime hours. Glare from headlights entering and exiting the site from Goldenwest Street would be momentarily visible to uses across Goldenwest (upon exiting the site) and perhaps, distantly, the residential uses to the west and north on entering the project.With implementation of mitigation measures MM4.1-3(d) and (e), non- reflective fagade treatments would be used to the extent feasible and substantial landscaping would be provided throughout the site to soften building appearance and glare. Cumulative Aesthetics Impact Given that the project would modify land that is currently Finding No. 3. The City finds that the cumulative undeveloped and the character of Central Park would be altered, impact is a result of incremental development which the proposed project would result in a cumulatively considerable reduces the amount of open space within the park. No impact. Landscaping and open space would be provided, which feasible mitigation is available, 41 would enhance the site's visual contribution to the surrounding park lands, and the project would not appear out of character when compared with surrounding land uses. However, the increase in development intensity of the project site, when compared with current uses, contributes incrementally to the visual degradation of the area In terms of reducing the amount of undeveloped open space within Central Park. This would be considered a significant cumulative impact. Huntingtr- Reach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Cori-!"erations 2-3 Chapter 2 CEQA Findings j, Tb N �ff t'V� Eli' 141. t Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 4.2-2. Peak construction activities associated with Construction related daily emissions would not exceed SCAQMD Finding 1. The City finds that changes or alterations the proposed project could generate emissions that exceed significance thresholds. However, these calculations assume that have been required in, or incorporated into, the SCAQMD thresholds. appropriate dust control measures would be implemented during project,which would reduce Impact 4.2-2 to less-than- each phase of development as required by SCAQMD Rule 403— significant levels. No additional mitigation measures Fugitive Dust, and that all other appropriate mitigation (mitigation are necessary with the implementation of CR4.2-2(a) measures MM4.2-2(a)through MM4.2-2(e))as well as appropriate through (f) and mitigation measures MM4.2-2(a) Code requirements CR4.2-2(a) through (f) have been through(e). implemented. Thus, all identified city code requirements and I mitigation measures are required. Biological Resources Impact 4.3-1.The proposed project could have a substantial Potential direct or indirect impacts to burrowing owls are Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or adverse Impact either directly(e.g., habitat loss)or indirectly considered a potentially significant impact. In addition, project alterations in the project, which would reduce (e.g., noise effects on wildlife)through habitat modifications, implementation and construction-related activities may result in Impact 4.3-1 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby on any species identified or published as an endangered, the disturbance of nesting species protected by the META. Prior incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation threatened, rare, candidate, sensitive, or special-status to the onset of ground disturbance activities, the City shall measures are necessary with the implementation of species by CDFG or USFWS, and meets the definition of implement mitigation measures MM4.3 1(a) through 4.3-11(b) and mitigation measures MM4.3-1(a) and 4.3-1(b) and Section 15380(b),(c), or(d)of the CEQA guidelines, Project Requirement PR4.3-1, which entail focused surveys and project requirement PR4.3-1 avoidance measures for the burrowing owl and sensitive nesting and MBTA species,and appropriate agency consultation. 41 Impact 4.3-2. Development of the proposed project would As a result of project implementation, approximately 5 acres of Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or have a substantial adverse impact to raptor foraging habitat. ruderal vegetation that is suitable for use as raptor foraging alterations in the project, which would reduce habitat would be removed, Although implementation of the Impact 4.3-2 to less-than-significant levels, are hereby proposed project would remove approximately 5 acres of existing incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation foraging habitat within the currently-designated Low Intensity measures are necessary with the implementation of Recreation Area, implementation of mitigation measure MM4.3-2 mitigation measure MM4.3-2. would ensure impacts to raptor foraging habitat would be mitigated at a ratio of 1:1. 2-4 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations CD Chapter 2 CEQA Findings f V1_ -.4 d' ["VT'r"" I.�H'4"Jl[ 1� F;J;; Cultural Resources Impact 4,4-1. Construction of the proposed project could While not expected, in the event that an intact portion of CA-QRA- Finding 1 The City finds that the identified changes or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of 142 Is identified, the potential for damage to or destruction of alterations in the project, which would reduce previously unknown archaeological resources that could be these cultural resources would be a potentially significant impact. Impact 4.4-1 to less-than-significant levels, are hereby present on the project site. Implementation of mitigation measures MM4.4-1(a) through (c) incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation would require monitoring of construction activities by a qualified measures are necessary with the implementation of professional archaeologist and would require the scientific mitigation measures MM4.4-1(a)through(c). recovery and evaluation of any archaeological resources that could be encountered, which would ensure that important scientific information that could be provided by these resources regarding history or prehistory is not lost. Impact 4.4-2. Paleontological resources could be present Even though previous activities may have involved excavation or Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or within rock units on the project site, and could be damaged other earth-disturbing activities, some paloontologicaliy sensitive alterations in the project, which would reduce or destroyed by earth-moving activities resulting from rock units underlying the project site may not have been Impact 4.4-2 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby Implementation of the proposed project. disturbed, despite the possible destruction of surface evidence of incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation their presence. Therefore, the impact resulting from damage to,or measures are necessary with the implementation of destruction of, these resources would be potentially significant, as mitigation measures MM4.4-1(a)and 4.4-1(b). it makes biological records of ancient life permanently unavailable for study by scientists, Mitigation measure MM4.4-1(a) requires monitoring of construction activities by a qualified paleontologist, J, and mitigation measure MM4,4-1(b) requires implementation of additional provisional measures in the event that paleontological resources are identified. Impact 4.4-3. Construction activities associated with Although not likely, the potential exists for archaeological Finding 1.The City finds that the Identified changes or implementation of the proposed project could result in the resources to be present and for excavation during construction alterations in the project, which would reduce disturbance of human remains, including those interred activities to disturb these resources, and it is possible that human Impact 4.4-3 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby outside of formal cemeteries. burials could be associated with potential finds. To reduce this incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation impact, and as required by law, mitigation measure MM4.4-3 measures are necessary with the implementation of reflects provisional measures if human remains are discovered on mitigation measure MM4.4-3. the project site. Huntingtr "each Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Corp;'Ierations 2-5 Chapter 2 CEQA Findings 414:1 T"I'TT"RIM Geology/Soils impact4.5-1. The proposed project would not significantly The proposed project site is situated in a seismically active area. Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or expose people or structures to effects of seismic ground During the design life of the development, strong ground shaking alterations in the project, which would reduce shaking or liquefaction. may occur. Accordingly, the proposed structures and Impact 4,5-1 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby improvements could be adversely impacted by the seismic ground incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation shaking if proper mitigation measures are not implemented. measures are necessary with the implementation of Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.5-1 would ensure that mitigation measure MM4,5-1. design recommendations identified within the GeatecWcal Evaluation prepared for the project site are implemented. Impact 4.5-2. The proposed project could expose people or There will be some grading along the north side adjacent to the Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or structures to effects of landslides. proposed access driveway off Goldenwest Street. Therefore, alterations in the project, which would reduce surficial sliding and erosion along this slope face could result in Impact4,5-2 to a less-than-significant level, are damage to the proposed project do to landslide and erosion. hereby incorporated into the project. No additional Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.5-2 would address mitigation measures are necessary with the these impacts. implementation of mitigation measure MM4.5-2. Impact 4.5-4. Development of the proposed project would Trash and other debris were not observed in the old fill materials Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or be located on potentially unstable (compressible and on site but may be encountered during grading. These materials alterations in the project, which would reduce corrosive)soils,which could result in on site settlement. are unsuitable for reuse. If left in the soil, these materials could Impact 4,54 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby affect the integrity of the proposed project. implementation of incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation mitigation measures MM4.6-4(a) and (b) would address potential measures are necessary with the implementation of impacts mitigation measures MM4.5-4(a)through (c). Yl Data pertaining to the corrosivity of the on-site soils were not available for review. The corrosion potential of soils will influence the type of construction materials that may be used for structures and pipelines on the project site. Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.5-4(c)would address potential impacts. lmpact4.5-5. The proposed project could be located on Due to the potential for volume changes with fluctuations in Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or expansive soil. moisture, expansive soils present a risk of distress to pavement, alterations in the project, which would reduce foundation elements, and other structures where present. Impact4,5-5 to a less-than-significant level, are Expansive soils generated from excavations are undesirable for hereby,incorporated into the project. No additional use as fill within three feet of slab-on-grade areas. Implementation mitigation measures are necessary with the of mitigation measure MM4.5-5 would ensure that development on implementation of mitigation measure MM4.5-5. expansive soil would not occur in a manner that would adversely affect development. 2-6 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations oo CD Chapter 2 CEQA Findings J 4 7' T;"."I! 0 1W. Hazards/Hazardous Materials Impact 4.6-1. Implementation of the proposed project could No known hazardous materials or wastes are present within the Finding 1,The City finds that the identified changes or create a significant hazard to the public or the environment proposed project site. Although not expected, grading and alterations in the project, which would reduce through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident excavation activities for the proposed project could result in the Impact 4.6-1 to less-than-significant levels, are hereby conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into exposure of construction personnel and the public to previously incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation the environment. unidentified hazardous substances in the soil. Implementation of measures are necessary with the implementation of mitigation measures MM4,6-1(a) through (c) would ensure mitigation measures MM4,6-1(a)through 4,6-1(d). remediation of contaminated soils containing hazardous materials prior to development of the proposed project and provide supplemental procedures in the event of unanticipated discoveries of contaminants. The project site is located within a designated methane gas overlay district. The City has set minimum requirements for new building construction within the methane overlay districts in order to reduce the hazards presented from accumulations of methane gas by requiring the appropriate testing and mitigation measures for all new buildings within the methane districts. Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.6-1(d) would ensure appropriate testing and methods of gas reduction,as required by the HBFD. Hydrologymater Quality Impact 4.7-1. Construction and operation of the proposed During the operational phase of the proposed project, the major Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or project could increase stormwater pollutant loads or source of pollution in stormwater runoff would be contaminants alterations in the project, which would reduce concentrations, which could result in a violation of water that have accumulated on rooftops and other impervious surfaces, Impact 4.7-1 to less-than-significant levels, are hereby quality standards or a substantial degradation of water such as parking lots, pedestrian walkways, and the off-site road incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation quality. improvement prior to connecting to the storm drain system, measures are necessary with the implementation of Implementation of the existing regulations including the mitigation measure MM4.7-1. MS4 Permit (adopted May 2009), the City's Municipal Code (Chapter 14,25), and the City's Local Implementation Plan (LIP), as well as mitigation measure MM4,7-1, the proposed project is required to develop and implement a project-specific WQMP that addresses appropriate stormwater quality best management practices (BMPs) and water quality management practices. As such, any post-construction violation of WDRs or water quality standards would be less than significant. In accordance Huntington Reach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 2-7 Chapter 2 CEQA Findings Impact 4.7-2. Implementation of the proposed project would Operation of the proposed project would result in a significant Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or alter the project site runoff characteristics that could result in change in land use and the potential for increased site runoff;both alterations in the project, which would reduce more on-site and off-site erosion. peak runoff rates and total storm flow volumes. The proposed Impact 4.7-2 to less-than-significant ievels, are hereby project would be required to develop and implement a WQMP incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation including post-construction structural and non-structural I3MPs for measures are necessary with the implementation of erosion and sediment controls, Implementation of mitigation mitigation measures MM4.7-1 and 4.7-2. measures MM4.7-1 and MM4.7-2 would reduce the potential storm flow rates to non-erosive conditions, reduce peak runoff tates, to existing conditions levels to the maximum extent practicable, assure slope stabilization, and implementation of post-construction erosion and sediment control BMPs, thereby reducing potential impacts associated with on-site or off-site erosion to less-than-significant levels. Impact 4.7-3. Implementation of the proposed project would Operation of the proposed project would result in a significant Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or alter the project site runoff characteristics that could result in change in land use and the potential for increased site runoff for alterations in the project, which would reduce more flooding off-site. both peak runoff rates and total storm flow volumes. Higher peak Impact 4.7-3 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby storm flow rates and overall volume could result in off-site flooding incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation in the areas down-gradient from the project site. Implementation measures are necessary with the implementation of of mitigation measure MM4.7-2 would assure that on-site drainage mitigation measure MM4.7-2. is adequate to prevent on-site flooding and that peak stormwater runoff rates are reduced to the maximum extent practicable to prevent contributions to off-site flooding. As required by mitigation measure MM4.7-2, the Drainage Plan will include measures to reduce post-construction peak runoff rates and timing to existing levels, as ensured by the City's Public Works Department. As a result, the proposed project would not contribute to future runoff rates on site or to off-site areas (including the Shipley Nature Center)above those that currently exist. Impact 4.7-4 Implementation of the proposed project may Operation of the proposed project would result in a significant Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or contribute runoff that would exceed the capacity of existing change in land use and may contribute runoff that would exceed alterations in the project, which would reduce stormwater drainage systems. the capacity of existing stormwater drainage systems. Impact 4.7-4 to less-than-significant levels, are hereby Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.7-2 would reduce Incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation runoff rates to existing conditions levels to the maximum extent measures are necessary with the implementation of practicable, thereby, reducing potential impacts on the storm mitigation measure MM4.7-2. drainage system capacity. As a result, the existing system would have adequate conveyance capacity for the I 00-year storm event. 2-8 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement.of Overriding Considerations Chapter 2 CEQA Findings The 4 r * Ok A. Impact 4.7-5. Implementation of the proposed project may amount, timing of application, and form of many landscape Finding 1,The City finds that the identified changes or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff chemicals can affect subsequent transport in stormwater. These alterations in the project, which would reduce during both construction and post-construction phases, activities could also result in additional sources of pollutants in Impact 4.7-5 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby runoff water from the proposed project. Implementation of incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation mitigation measure MM43-5 would maximize efficiency of measures are necessary with the implementation of landscape chemical applications and minimize the potential for mitigation measures MM4.7-1,4.7-2, and 4,7-5. chemicals in runoff water. Impact 4.7-6. Implementation of the proposed project may Infiltration structures that are not correctly designed and sited Finding 1. The City finds that the identified changes or otherwise substantially degrade groundwater quality by could result in contaminated stormwater leaching into alterations in the project, which would reduce allowing infiltration of polluted stormwater. groundwater systems and destabilization of fill material, Mitigation Impact 4.7-6 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby measure MM4.7-2 would prevent implementation of stormwater incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation quality BMPs that could contribute to degradation of groundwater measures are necessary with the implementation of resources. mitigation measure MM4.7-2. Noise Impact 4.9-1, Construction activities associated with the The residences closest to the project site are located immediately Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or proposed project would not exceed the standards west of the site, along Lakeview Drive, approximately 800 feet alterations in the project, which would reduce established in the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. from the site boundary. At this distance, typical daily construction Impact 4.9-1 to less-than-significant levels,are hereby activities (excavation and grading) could reach 62 dBX incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation Additionally, patrons utilizing the passive use park adjacent to the measures are necessary with the implementation of proposed project site could experience noise levels of up to 86 mitigation measures MM 4.9-1 (a) and (b) and Code dBA during construction activities. Implementation of mitigation requirements CR4.9-1 (a)and (b). measures MM4.9-1(a) and MM4.9-1(b) as well as Code requirements CR4,9-1(a) and CR4.9 1(b) would help minimize noise generated by construction activities associated with the proposed project to the surrounding sensitive receptors, Recreation Impact 411-11, Construction activities associated with the Construction of the proposed project Could disrupt one hole of the Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or proposed project may result In significant impacts to the existing disc golf course. Implementation of mitigation measure alterations in the project, which would reduce existing disc golf course. MM4.11-1 would ensure that the disc golf course hole is Impact4.11-1 to less-than-significant levels, are permanently relocated back to the official disc golf course. hereby incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation measures are necessary with the implementation of mitigation measure MM4,1 1-1. Huntingt-- Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Cor,;"erations 2-9 Chapter 2 CEQA Findings 1101111 !:J�1 1 il J, f,Yril-I ty Transportation/Traffic Impact4.12-5. The project would not substantially increase In order to address safety concerns related to exiting the project Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or roadway hazards, site, mitigation measures have been identified that Would alterations in the project, which would reduce eliminate potentially unsafe movements. These measures would lmpact4,12-5 to less-than-significant levels, are also address the potential sight distance issue related to the uphill hereby incorporated into the project. No additional grade for southbound traffic on Goldenwest Street in this location, mitigation measures are necessary with the Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.12-4 and Code Implementation of Code requirements CR4.12-4(a) requirements CR4.12-4(a) and CR4.12-4(b) would reduce and(b)and mitigation measure MM4.12-4. potential impacts associated with roadway hazards to a less-than- significant level. Utilities/Service Systems Impact 4.13-2, Implementation of the proposed project is Although the proposed project is not anticipated to exceed the Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or anticipated to be sufficiently served by existing water supply. existing water supply and is anticipated to be sufficiently served alterations in the project, which would reduce by existing water supplies, implementation of mitigation measure Impact4.13-2 to less-than-significant levels, are MM4.13-11 would further ensure the availability of water supplies, hereby incorporated into the project. No additional mitigation measures are necessary with the implementation of mitigation measure MM4,13-1. Impact4.13-5. Implementation of the proposed project The proposed project would involve the construction and Finding 1. The City finds that the identified changes or would include new stormwater treatment control BMPs, the operation of stormwater treatment control Best Management alterations in the project, which would reduce operation of which would not result in significant Practices (BMPs) that would be identified in a Stormwater Impact4.13-5 to less-than-significant levels, are environmental effects. Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which would be a part of the hereby incorporated into the project. No additional project's Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). The City has mitigation measures are necessary with the general/standard conditions of approval to protect receiving water implementation of Code requirement CR4.13-1(a) and quality from short-and long-term impacts of new development and (b). significant redevelopment, which include Code requirements CR4,13-1(a) and (b), Since stormwater treatment control BMPs must be in conformance with approved plans and specifications of appropriate agencies, operations would not be anticipated to result in significant environmental effects including, but not limited to,vectors or odors. to 2-10 Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations CD Chapter 2 CEQA Findings Impact 4.13-8. Implementation of the proposed project could New electrical facilities would have to be constructed on site. Finding 1.The City finds that the identified changes or Increase the demand for electricity, and could require or Implementation of mitigation measure MM4.13-3 would reduce alterations in the project, which would reduce result in the construction of new energy production or potentially significant impacts associated with the anticipated Impact4.13-8 to less-than-significant levels, are transmission facilities not require or result in the construction electrical demands of the proposed project to a less than- hereby incorporated into the project. No additional of new gas production or transmission facilities. significant level by ensuring availability of electrical facilities• mitigation measures are necessary with the implementation of mitigation measure MM4.13-3. Huntingto- Reach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Cona'derations 2-11 CHAPTER 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives 3.1 INTRODUCTION The SEIR prepared for the Huntington Beach Senior Center considered seven separate alternatives to the proposed project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(a), the primary intent of an alternatives evaluation is to "describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives." This chapter describes the project objectives and design criteria used to develop and evaluate project alternatives presented in the Draft SEIR A description of the alternatives compared to the proposed project and the findings regarding the feasibility of adopting the described alternatives is presented for use by the City in the decision-making process. 3.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES Implementation of the Huntington Beach Senior Center is intended to fulfill the following major objectives: ■ Implement the policies and development standards of the City's General Plan and Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (ZSO). • Create a development that is compatible with and sensitive to the existing land uses in the project area. ® Enhance the community image of Huntington Beach through the design and construction of high quality development consistent with the Urban Design Element of the City's General Plan. ® Ensure adequate utility infrastructure and public services for new development. • Provide a centrally located senior recreation and human service facility within the City. • Build a new facility large enough to meet current and future demand as a result of an increasing senior population. ■ Provide a state-of-the art senior center designed for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational senior population with levels of service comparable to other cities in the area. ■ Mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible. • Provide an attractively designed building that maximizes safety and security of seniors, employees, and other users of the facility. • Utilize sound green-building practices during construction and operation of the facility by incorporating those standards found in the Cal Green Building Code, and, as feasible, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System to maximize Huntington Beach Senior Center SEIR Findings of�--i, rnent of Overriding Considerations 1413 -421- Item 15. - 54 Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Aiternatives efficiencies and demonstrate the City's commitment to responsible leadership in the area of sustainable development. 3.3 SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES The range of feasible alternatives was selected and discussed in a manner to foster meaningful public participation and informed decision-snaking. Among the factors that were taken into account when considering the feasibility of alternatives (as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6[£l[1]) were environmental impacts, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, regulatory limitations, jurisdictional boundaries, and attainment of project objectives. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(a), the SEIR need not consider an alternative whose effects could not be reasonably identified, whose implementation is remote or speculative, or one that would not achieve the basic project objectives. The analysis includes sufficient information about each alternative to provide meaningful evaluation, analysis and comparison with the proposed project. 3.4 PROJECT ALTERNATIVE FINDINGS The following is a description of the alternatives evaluated in comparison to the proposed project, as well as a description of the specific economic, social, or other considerations that make them infeasible for avoiding or lessening the impacts. The City finds that the adoption of any of the alternatives to the project is infeasible. The reasons for each finding are provided following the description of the alternative,and are farther described in the Draft SEIR. 3.4.1 Huntington Beach Senior Center Aiternatives As shown below and in Chapter 6 (Alternatives to the Proposed Project) of the Draft SEIR, seven alternatives were evaluated in comparison to the proposed project. The environmental advantages and disadvantages of each of these alternatives are described. The alternatives that were selected for analysis include: • Alternative 1: (No Project/Continuation. of Uses Allowed by Existing General Plan and Central Park Master Plan)—Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(3)(C), this alternative assumes the development level articulated in the City's Master Plan of Recreation. Uses for Central Park (Central Park Master Plan) (1999), which envisioned development of a portion of a "low intensity recreation area," which would include family picnic shelters,barbeques, a tot lot, a resttoom building, an access road from Goldenwest Street, and a parking lot. Because the Central Park Master Plan proposed the recreation area as a program on a total of 16 acres, not all of these elements are likely to be present on the 5-acre project site, and the specific locations of the proposed uses are interchangeable; therefore, this analysis assumes development of the most intensive of these uses, namely, the access road, parking lot, restsooms, tot lot, and some open space. • Alternative 2: Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration—This alternative assumes a reduced intensity and revised configuration of the project elements on the same 5-acre project site. Under this alternative, the proposed senior center would be reduced by about one third (15,000 square feet [sf]), and would include a 30,000 sf structure,,reoriented north/south and located at the southeastern corner of the project site. Huntington Beach Senior Center FIR Finriings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Item 15. - 55 HB -422- Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project AftematNes ■ Alternative 3: Central Park Alternative Site (Northwest Corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street}—This alternative assumes development of a 45,000 sf senior center on another site within Central Park. The general configuration of the site would be maintained. Direct access to the parking lot would be provided by curb cuts on Goldenwest Street and Ellis Avenue as identified in the 2006 Huntington Beach Senior Center Feasibility Study (LPA 2006). Nevertheless,this alternative would maintain a similar flow of traffic to the proposed project. ■ Alternative 4: Kettler School Alternative Site--This alternative assumes that the 38,412 sf of existing development on the vacant 9.5 acre Kettler School site would be reuscd and modified to accommodate the Huntington Beach Senior Center. The Kettler School site is located at 8750 Dorsett Drive, in the southeast portion of Huntington Beach. The southern 5-acre turf portion of this site, south of the extension of Stillwell Drive, is subject to a deed restriction that a portion of the site be used for school or parks and recreation purposes. Under this Alternative, the 5-acre area would continue to be developed with the existing softball fields. Circulation on the site would remain consistent with existing conditions, with vehicular access and parking provided from Dorsett Drive. Acquisition of the site would have to be negotiated with the school district for purchasc or lease. ■ Alternative 5: Park View School Alternative Site—This alternative assumes that 45,000 sf of an existing 56,837 sf building on the 12-acre site Park View school site would be reused and modified to accommodate the Huntington Beach Senior Center.The Park View school site located at 16666 Tunstall Lane in Huntington Beach is owned by the Ocean View School District. The District has historically retained ownership of their properties, electing to lease the land for alternate purposes. As such, under this Alternative, it is assumed that the site would be leased from the District by the City. Existing athletic fields located on the site would remain with implementation of this alternative. Existing access to the site from Goldenwest Street, identified as a major arterial street and Heil Avenue, identified as a primary arterial street in the City's General Plan would remain with implementation of this alternative. ® Alternative 6: Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site—Under this alternative, the 45,000 sf senior center would be located on a portion of the 27-interior acres of the 40-acre Magnolia Tank Farm site. This site is located on the west side of Magnolia Street, between Bermuda Avenue on the north and the Huntington Beach Channel on the south. The site was formerly used for oil storage,but is no longer operational. ® Alternative 7: The Cove Alternative Site—Under this alternative, the 45,000 sf senior center would be located on a portion of the 9.9-acre, undeveloped site located at 7301 Garfield Avenue at the northeast corner of Garfield Avenue and Gothard Street. Access to the site is currently provided from Gothard Street but could be provided from either, or both, Gothard Street or Garfield Avenue. The existing zoning (Specific Plan No. 9, Holly-Seacliff Specific Plan) and General Plan designation (Residential Medium Density)would need to be changed to allow for the proposed use. The Cove site would require remediation on a portion of the site and further study and investigation would be required to determine the level of contamination and proper remediation actions. E Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Evaluation Three additional alternatives were initially considered but were found to be infeasible. These included: No Project/No Development Alternative, Rodgers Senior Center, and Satellite Senior Centers. The No Project/No Development Alternative represents the status quo, or maintenance of the project site in its Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fart/gtatament of Overriding Considerations Hs -423- Item 15. - 56 Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives current state. The site would remain as an underused parcel of land adjacent to the Central Library and would provide no state-of-the-art improvements, in a central location, to meet current and projected needs for recreation and community services for senior citizens in the City. Implementation of the No Project/No Development Alternative would not meet any of the project objectives, as no new uses would be developed. The second alternative that was rejected as infeasible would provide a new state-of-the-art senior center on the site of the existing Rodgers Senior Center. However, due to the known site constraints, lack of available funding to accommodate a new development on this site (costs would be much greater because a subterranean parking facility would be needed), and because this would not provide a centrally-located senior center within the City, this alternative was rejected from further analysis. Further, this alternative may not be in compliance with the City Zoning Code, in terms of site coverage, building height and setbacks, and may requite a variance. The Satellite Senior Center alternative suggests development of multiple, smaller-scale senior centers throughout the City. Construction of small-scale centers could accommodate a limited number of facilities, available activities, and patrons at each site, and would also preclude a central focal point for seniors to meet within the City. Instead, most patrons would utilize the nearest facility; thereby reducing the important opportunities for larger social gatherings and networking. Each site location would have differing environmental constraints. Compared to the proposed project, multiple centers would not have the flexibility to provide for a wide variety of uses simply due to size constraints at each location. In addition, the construction and operation of multiple centers would have a greater potential for cumulative environmental impacts. Further, the City does not own all of the nine sites evaluated in the Feasibility Study, which could lead to acquisition costs that the City would not be able to fund. Therefore, this alternative was rejected from further analysis. Lastly, Alternative Sites such as vacant school sites, the former Orange County Transfer Station, and vacant commercial buildings were investigated but determined to be infeasible. The City identified and reviewed twelve closed school sites within the Huntington Beach, Ocean View, and Westminster School Districts that could potentially be used for a proposed senior center. Of the twelve school sites, three sites were available for use; Kettler School (Huntington Beach School District), LeBard School (Huntington Beach City School District) and Park View School (Ocean View School District). All three sites have zoning and land use designations that would allow for a senior center facility. As described above under Alternatives to the Project, the Kettler School (#4) and Park View (#5) sites are being analyzed as _Mternatives to the proposed project. However, based on a qualitative analysis by Urban Crossroads (the EIR traffic consultants), use of the LeBard School site for the proposed senior center has been determined to be infeasible as a result of the site's location in a single-family residential neighborhood where access from an arterial roadway is not readily available and access could not be constructed from an arterial. The remaining nine closed school sites identified are not available and therefore, could not be accomplished in a reasonable amount of time. In addition, the remaining school sites may not help reduce project impacts. Therefore, ten of the alternative school sites were rejected from further analysis. The former Orange County Transfer Station is currently zoned and has a General Plan land use designation of Industrial requiring an amendment to the City's Zoning Map and General Plan. Soil Huntington Beach Senior Cente•'-"' ^�'�ngs of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Item 15. - 57 HB -424- Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Aitemadves contamination and biological impacts are likely on this site, unlike for the proposed project. As such, the site was rejected from further analysis. As a result of the economic recession, a number of large vacant, commercial buildings (primarily grocery stores) have become available for use. The feasibility of using the vacant grocery store building(s) for a new senior center facility is low due to the incompatibility of a park or recreational use in a commercial zone, as well as a potential incompatibility of the use with other existing tenants of the shopping centers. Additionally, reuse of existing, readily available, revenue-generating commercial properties for a park and recreational use does not make great financial sense, especially in light of the economic recession that has shade these buildings available. Further on the financial front, the acquisition of such a commercial space may not economically feasible for the City. As such, this alternative has been rejected from further analysis. E Alternative 1: No Project,/ Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Central Park Master Plan Alternative The No Project/Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Central Park Master Plan Alternative assumes the development level articulated in the City's Central Park Master Plan (1999), which envisioned development of a portion of a "low intensity recreation area," which would include family picnic shelters, barbeques, a tot lot, a restroom building, an access road from Goldenwest Street, and a parking lot Because the Central Park Master Plan proposed the recreation area as a program on a total of 16 acres, not all of these elements are likely to be present on the 5-acre project site, and the specific locations of the proposed uses are interchangeable; therefore, this analysis assumes development of the most intensive of these uses, namely, the access road, parking lot, restrooms, tot lot, and some open space. The No Project/Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Central Park Master Plan Alternative would result m substantially less development compared to the proposed project, as no habitable structures other than the restrooms are proposed under this alternative. Implementation of this alternative would not achieve any of the project objectives listed for the City of Huntington Beach, since the development of a senior center facility would not occur. This No Project/Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Central Park Master Plan Alternative would result in fewer impacts to aesthetics, air quality, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise,recreation,transportation and utilities. This alternative would result in similar impacts on biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and public services and would not result in impacts that would be greater than the proposed project While this alternative may result in a reduction of most environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project. Findings The City hereby finds that the No Project/ Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Master Plan Alternative is infeasible for the following environmental, economic, social, and other considerations: Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of F-^*fe+-*-^gent of overriding Considerations HB -425- Item 15. - 58 Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives ® Would not provide a centrally located senior recreation and human service facility within the City ® Would not build a new facility large enough to meet current and future demand as a result of an increasing senior population • Would not provide a state-of-the art senior center designed for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational senior population with levels of service comparable to other cities in the area • Would not provide an attractively designed building that maximizes safety and security of seniors, employees, and other users of the facility. w Would not utilize sound green-building practices during construction and operation of the facility by incorporating those standards found in the Cal Green Building Code and, as feasible, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System to maximize efficiencies and demonstrate the City's commitment to responsible leadership in the area of sustainable development. 111 Alternative 2: Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration Alternative The Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration Alternative assumes a reduced intensity and revised configuration of the project elements on the same project site. Under this alternative, the proposed senior center would be reduced by about one third (15,000 sf), and would comprise a 30,000 sf structure, reoriented north-south and located at the southeastern corner of the project site. Screening vegetation separating the senior center from Goldenwest Street and from the disc golf course would be provided. Wide,paved walkways and patios would follow the northern and western perimeters of the center. Under the Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration Alternative, although the structure would be smaller than the proposed project, the senior center would be more than double the size of the existing Rodgers Senior Center. However, this alternative would be constructed on a smaller scale within the same project area than the proposed project. This alternative would not achieve the proposed project objectives of building a new facility large enough to meet current and future demands of a growing senior population, or provide a state-of-the art senior center designed for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational senior population with levels of service comparable to other cities in the area, to the extent of the proposed project. The Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration Alternative would result in reduced impacts to air quality, hydrology and water quality, noise, transportation and utilities than the proposed project due to its reduced density. This alternative would result in similar impacts on aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, land use, public services and recreation, and would not result in impacts that would be greater than the proposed project. While this alternative may result in a reduction of most environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project. Findings The City hereby finds that the Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration Alternative is infeasible for the following environmental,economic, social, and other considerations: Huntington Beach Senior Center FIR Finrfings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Item 15. - 59 11B -426- Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Altematives • Would not build a new facility large enough to meet current and future demand as a result of an increasing senior population • Would not provide a state-of-the art senior center designed for innovative programming to meet the needs of a culturally diverse and multi-generational senior population with levels of service comparable to other cities in the area 11- Alternative 3: Central Park Alternative Site (Northwest Corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street) The Central Park Alternative Site assumes development of the proposed senior center at an alternate site located at the northwest corner of Goldenwest Street and Ellis Avenue, approximately 1,200 feet south of the proposed project site. The general configuration of the site would be maintained. Direct access to the parking lot would be provided by curb cuts on Goldenwest Street and Ellis Avenue as identified in the 2006 Huntington Beach Senior Center Feasibility Study. Nevertheless, this alternative would maintain a similar flow of traffic as the proposed project. The setback from Goldenwest Street would be the same as under the proposed project, and additionally, a setback from Ellis Avenue would be provided and would be identical to the setback from Goldenwest Street. In all other physical and operational respects, this alternative would remain the same as under the proposed project. The alternative site is occasionally used by the equestrian center for larger shows and storage throughout the year. Therefore, although the site is presently undeveloped, development of this alternative would reduce the existing recreational opportunities that are present. The Central Park Alternative would reduce many of the impacts, either equal to or less than the proposed project,with the exception of noise,which would result in a greater less than significant impact than the proposed project. This alternative would eliminate the significant and unavoidable cumulative impact identified for the proposed project relating to the visual degradation of undeveloped open space, while achieving all of the project objectives. Since no other alternative analyzed would achieve all of the stated project objectives, while reducing impacts and eliminating the identified cumulative impact, of its reduced intensity, the City finds that Central Park Alternative Site is considered to be the environmentally superior alternative. However, implementation of this alternative would not achieve any the project objectives goal to mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible. The Central Park Alternative Site would result in fewer impacts to aesthetics and land use. This alternative would result in similar impacts on air duality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, public services, recreation, transportation and utilities. This alternative would result in greater noise impacts than the proposed project. Findings The City hereby finds that the Alternative Site is infeasible for the following environmental, economic, social,and other considerations: ® Would not mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fart/Statement of Overriding Considerations HB -427- Item 15. - 60 Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Altematives Alternative 4: Kettler School Alternative Site The Kettler School Alternative Site is located at 8750 Dorsett Drive in the southeast portion of Huntington Beach. The site was the former Kettler Elementary School which closed in 2005. The site is currently developed with 38,418 sf of building area, an approximately 28-space surface parking lot, and paved areas, with the development located on the northern approximately 4.5 acres of the 9-acre site. The southern approximately 5 acres of the site is developed with grass athletic fields, including three softball diamonds. This alternative assumes that the existing vacant 38,412 sf building would be reused and modified to accommodate the senior center facility and the existing surface parking lot and portions of the existing paved areas would be modified to provide approximately 192 parking spaces. This site is located in a single family neighborhood, and is bound to the west and east by single family homes, to the north by Dorsett Drive and single family homes, and to the south by the Edison Community Center and Park.. The athletic field portion of the site, located south of Stillwell Drive,is subject to a deed restriction that requires the site to be used for school or parks and recreation purposes. As such, the existing use of the grass athletic field area for softball fields would remain with implementation of this alternative. As the Kettler School Alternative Site would not require building construction and would be located on a previously developed site, this alternative would reduce construction related impacts associated with the proposed project. Additionally, use of this site as a senior center is permitted under the site's current zoning (Public/Semi Public) and general plan land use designation (Public) and is compatible with the adjacent Edison Community Center and Park, and would therefore not require amendments to the City's zoning code or General Plan. Additionally, the site is a closed school site with no current use leasing the building. The Kettler School site was specifically identified in the Parks suit filed against the City. While this alternative may result in a reduction of environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project. Kettler School Alternative Site would result in reduced impacts to aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, recreation, and utilities when compared to the proposed project. This alternative would result in similar impacts on land use and public services. While this alternative would result in impacts that are reduced when compared to the proposed project,it would result in greater impacts than the proposed project on air quality,noise and transportation. Findings The City hereby finds that the Kettler School Alternative Site is infeasible for the following environmental, economic, social, and other considerations: • Would not provide a centrally located senior recreation and human service facility within the City. e Would not utilize sound green-building practices during construction and operation of the facility by incorporating those standards found in the Cal Green Building Code and, as feasible, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System to maximize efficiencies and demonstrate the City's commitment to responsible leadership in the area of sustainable development. IN Would not mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible. Huntington Beach Senior Cente,r'o c^-';,)gs of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Item 15. - 61 HB -428- Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Altematives M Alternative 5; Park View School Alternative Site The Park Vieux School Alternative assumes that 45,000 sf of an existing 56,837 sf building on the 12-acre site would be reused and modified to accommodate a senior center facility. The existing Park View School is located at 16666 Tunstall Lane, bound to the west and north by single- and multi.-family residential uses; to the east by industrial uses; and to the south by the Murdy Community Center. The site, formerly the home of Park View School is developed with 56,837 sf of building area, surface parking lots, paved areas, and grass athletic fields that include four baseball diamonds utilized by Ocean View Little League and two activity fields. The athletic field portion of the site would remain with implementation of this alternative. The Park View School site would reduce construction related impacts associated with the proposed project, as this alternative would not require building construction and would be located on a previously developed site. Additionally,use of this site as a senior center is permitted under the site's current zoning (Public/Semi Public) and general plan land use designation (Public) and is compatible with the adjacent Murdy Community Center and would not require a zone change or General Plan amendment (GPA). Additionally, the site is a closed school site with no current use leasing the building. Further, this site is easily accessible from Goldenwest Street and Heil Avenue. While this alternative may result in a reduction of environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project. Park View School Alternative Site would result in reduced impacts to aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, and recreation when compared to the proposed project. This alternative would result in similar impacts to geology and soils, land use, public services and utilities when compared to the proposed project. While this alternative would result in impacts that are less than or similar to the proposed project, it would result in greater impacts than the proposed project on air quality, noise and transportation. Findings The City hereby finds that the Park View School Alternative Site is infeasible for the following environmental,economic, social, and other considerations: ® Would not utilize sound green-budding practices during construction and operation of the facility by incorporating those standards found in the Cal Green Building Code and, as feasible, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System to maximize efficiencies and demonstrate the City's commitment to responsible leadership in the area of sustainable development. ® Would not mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible. Alternative 6e Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site, The Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site assumes the 45,000 sf senior center would be located on a portion of the 27-acre former Magnolia Tank Farm. The Magnolia Tank Farm site is located on the west side of Magnolia Street between Bermuda Avenue and Banning Avenue, bound to the north by a former landfill; to the east by Magnolia Avenue and across Magnolia Avenue by single-family residential uses; to the south and west by the Huntington Beach Flood Channel and across the Huntington Beach Flood Huntington Beach Senior Center£IR Findings of F--t«+Mt-rnent of overriding Considerations HB -429- Item 15. - 62 Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives Channel by wetlands (southwest) and by industrial uses (west). 1'he site was formerly used for oil storage, but is no longer in operation and is developed with three oversized oil tanks connected to each other by pipelines. The general surface area is covered mostly with dirt. Trees and green space line the eastern edge of the project boundary along Magnolia Street providing a visual buffer of onsite uses from passersby on Magnolia Street. The Magnolia. Tank Farm site would reduce construction and operational noise impacts associated with the proposed project, as the site is bound to the north by undeveloped land; to the west by the Huntington Beach Flood Channel, land that was formerly used for oil storage that is no longer operational, and wetlands; to the south by wetlands and the Huntington Beach Flood Channel; and to the east, across Magnolia Avenue by single-family residential uses. The site would be easily accessible from Magnolia Avenue, an arterial roadway ire the City. Additionally, use of this site as a senior center is permitted under the existing zoning (Public/Semi Public) and general plan land use designation (Public) and would not require a zone change or GPA. Because the site is no longer operational, it would be available for acquisition and development but would require demolition of the existing oil tanks. While this alternative may result in a reduction of environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project. Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site would result in fewer impacts to aesthetics and recreation when compared to the proposed project This alternative would result in similar impacts on air quality, cultural resources, geology and soils, land use, public services, transportation and utilities when compared to the proposed project. While this alternative would result in impacts that are less than or similar to the proposed project,it would result in greater impacts than the proposed project to hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality,and noise. Findings The City hereby finds that the Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site is infeasible for the following environmental, economic, social, and other considerations: • Would not provide a centrally located senior recreation and human service facility within the City • Would not mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible E Alternative 7: The Cove Alternative Site The Cove Alternative Site includes construction of a 45,000 sf senior center on a portion of the 9-9-acre, undeveloped site at the northeast corner of Gothard Street and Garfield Avenue. The site is bound to the north and east by single-family residential uses; to the south by multi-family residential uses across Garfield Avenue; and to the west by industrial uses across Gothard Street. The general surface area is covered mostly with patches of grass and shrubs. This alternative site is located at the intersection of two arterial roadways (Gothard Street and Garfield Avenue), and access is currently provided from Seagate Drive via Promenade Parkway. The Cove Alternative Site has a central location in the City and the site is vacant This alternative site is located at the intersection of two arterial roadways (Gothard Street and Garfield Avenue), and access is currently provided from Seagate Drive via Promenade Parkway.However, the site is zoned Holly Seacliff Huntington Beach Senior Center 1:'FA Pnriings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations Item 15. - 63 1H13 -430- Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives Specific Plan and has a General Plan designation of Residential Medium Density Residential, and implementation of this alternative would require a Zoning Map and GPA. In addition, the current property owners are interested in a land swap with the City for the existing Rodgers Senior Center site. The Rodgers Senior Center site has an existing deed restriction for use of the site as a public park and recreational facility. The land swap would require the removal of the deed restriction on the existing senior center site to allow development of that property for non-recreational uses. A land swap involving City owned property would be subject to voter approval, pursuant to Huntington Beach Charter Section 612. While this alternative may result in a reduction of environmental impacts, it would not necessarily reduce the significance of the impacts below those of the proposed project The Cove Alternative Site would result in reduced impacts to aesthetics, biological resources, and recreation. This alternative would result in similar impacts on cultural resources, geology and soils,public services and utilities when compared to the proposed project. While this alternative would result in impacts that are less than or similar to the proposed project, it would result in greater impacts than the proposed project on air quality, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise and transportation. Findings The City hereby tends that The Cove Alternative Site is infeasible for the following environmental, economic, social, and other considerations: 0 Would not mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible Huntington Beach Senior Center EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations 1-113 -431- Item 15. - 64 CHAPTER 4 Statement of Overriding Considerations 4.1 INTRODUCTION CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 states: (a) CEQA requires the decision-snaking agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered"acceptable." (b)When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final SEIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened,the agency shall state in writing the specific reason to support its actions based on the final SEIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. The City of Huntington Beach (City) proposes to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations regarding the significant cumulative aesthetic impact of the proposed project. Although all project level impacts are reduced to less-than-significant levels, this section describes the anticipated economic, social, and other benefits or other considerations of the proposed project to support the decision to proceed with the project even though one identified cumulative impact is not mitigated to a less-than-significant level. 4.2 SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE CUMULATIVE IMPACT The City is proposing to approve the proposed project, with revisions to reduce environmental impacts, and has prepared an SEIR required by CEQA. Even with revisions in the project, the following impact is unavoidable because it has been determined that no feasible mitigation is available. Refer to Chapter 2 (CEQA Findings) for further chv fication regarding the impact listed below. Aesthetics Given that the project would modify land that is currently undeveloped, the character of Central Park would be altered,which would result in a cumulatively considerable impact. Landscaping and open space would be provided, which would enhance the site's visual contribution to the surrounding park lands, and the project would not appear out of character when compared with surrounding land uses. However, the increase in development intensity of the project site, when compared with current uses, contributes incrementally to the visual degradation of the area in terms of reducing the amount of undeveloped open space within Central Park.This would be considered a significant cumulative impact. igton Beach Senior Center SEIR Findings of FactlStaternent of Overriding Considerations 4-1 Item 15. - 65 FIB -432- Chapter 4 Statement of Overriding Considerations 4.3 FINDINGS The City has evaluated all feasible mitigation measures and project revisions with respect to this cumulative aesthetic impact (see Chapter 2 [CEQA Findings]). The City has also examined a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project (see Chapter 3 [Findings Regarding Project Alternatives]). Based on this examination, the City has determined that because of its alternative location, the Alternative Central Park Site Alternative is considered to be the environmentally superior alternative. Several of the seven alternatives listed above would potentially result in less significant environmental impacts than the proposed project. The Kettler School Alternative Site, Park View Alternative Site, Magnolia Tank Farm Alternative Site and the Cove Alternative Site were found to result in greater impacts than the proposed project The City finds these seven alternatives infeasible and less desirable than the proposed project and has rejected these alternatives from further consideration because they would not achieve the environmental, economic, social, and other considerations outlined in Chapter 3 (Findings Regarding Project Alternatives). 4.4 OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Specific economic, social, or other considerations outweigh the cumulative aesthetic impact stated above. The reasons for proceeding with the proposed project, even though one identified cumulative impact is not fully mitigated to a less-than-significant level, are described below. 0 Proposed Project Benefits The proposed project would provide a new, centrally located state-of-the-art senior center that would be large enough to respond to the changing needs of the population and simultaneously meet the unique developmental needs and diverse interests of the City's senior residents. 1. Development of the proposed project would allow the City to serve a higher percentage of its senior population with levels of service comparable to other cities in the area. 2. The proposed project emphasizes compatibility and sensitivity to the existing uses surrounding the site and would include a variety of sustainable features such as bioswales, drought tolerant landscaping, waterless urinals, roofing materials, and installation of low-flush water devices. The City is actively pursuing the feasibility of including additional features that would bring the building closer to LEED certification. 3. The project will maintain and enhance the community image of Huntington Beach through the design and construction of high quality development consistent with the Urban Design Element of the City's General Plan. 4-2 Huntington Beach Senior Center ElR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considr--"--- HB -433- Item 15. - 66 ATTACHMENT #55J ATTACHMENT NO. 5 FINAL SEIR NO. 07-002 NOT ATTACHED AVAILABLE AT: CITY HALL — CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (2ND FLOOR) CITY HALL — PLANNING COUNTER (3RD FLOOR) CENTRAL LIBRARY ALSO AVAILABLE AT THE FOLLOWING LINK: http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/Government/Depar tments/Planning/major/senior_center.cfm xB -435- Item 15. - 68 ATTACHMENT #6) Item 15. - 69 nn -4,n- gg- --n -am qg; 11MR, V MN! gilli �t'. ! WIN,'111�e I- Wk"Tiw M 34 "'�"--T BEACH,CA 071 3�1283.01 PROJECT FOR: `Mr, K A R Ou ?op 4tO6 MACARTHIIR BLVD. '4LJITF 2DO 'EWPI�RT BEACH. PARKNG SUMMAI I RY rfr A 9�660 PAIII L& t— .MTH LbT —L.. iljJ T: ,.__,;kt}'tII......;i - 4 ..�,r'`-,l-. {_ 'yrU.,i'' 'S i' �ki 'i,^:;,a r "! .1.I 7t.i'. r'lill : F'r• r ,f{i;lst �!nf � i Wi+{i j...E rFTr `i RIM N .. .4 m Hill!11 1+'if#'•.� € t t i � _ €{ � '•! } !!.I f i:'}' �r!,,rl}f';{'#lir# � �� ! "I. ♦r�-kr..;r '-g'gg g, 1, 7 � g&.Ip 41 U WE f j }1 11 j(`'; ' {! I.r !, tF !,( I� I' ,j� { {{ ��(� �}�}�I�j i;,.r i�+lifs.j�; #�� {��{,}}�.iF; 9W i H �;-E PLAN " 1 " IW7 IMM HMfa1 -lMAM1.1 I , -E1 Try KIK Q'I'l—11 A". u-. WD nm'WIN IXI mrap F, :Irlcxarc h itects. m t .1111 1111 4TINGTON BFACH,CA 0713,1283.= PROJECT FOR: ----------------li� 1 M.1-A-K A R! 4100 MACARTIIQR BLVD s i11TE 200 CA?2660 $1111111 liNvii 111110, 11111 It'll 1111111 K! I gp ! T1,111,11filil lj-� .4 li.q. 41.265 too PINESI m OMNI -L.4' 1 17 1. NORTH ELEVATION T lw ;U:lLui 41i i fill, it 2. EAST ELEVATION MATERM 1.STAH0t"c3M3AlUWR0Cr I STUX0 3.DAY StA STONT 4:WUVW.M AL S. t,"WHIn ruRE 7.WOW TFALIS ELEVATIONS JULY9.2M7 iT4 1N1 1lIiAN,ANfI 14— MI MYbt�nIRONBJMM,iB,: architect5 Mrm gi Lu -pill ig ;Fiii • M t ygigt p f -qil -,T it 1 011 HLINTINC31 N BEAU ,(,A 0?13,1263.01 PROJECT FOR: M. A-K, .1-hnAC TWIA'BITE .. ,E WPORT BEACH. CA 1266. jun I'M T:949 255 1 1 00 R F-�.255. 28 IT! !M I g it 'I �!Me. iI W, M F:;0 3. SOUTH ELEVATION JI t I t 14, 4 if It 4 it IF 8, it 4.WEST ELEVATION MATERIALS LSTANMGAUAtMAMROW I SluXo 3.DRYS A 9,014t 4 WooWltAL SAM$ VATIONS K nJ • architects p mllimqjl�qm, 4 2. jpjpig i1pligj) PH 5.1 .rt U. T, �j ilqn JI, U'b 'VVM'rA =TlNGT0BEAc_;; (�A 0713.1 83.. 1 PROJECI FOR: K. A R� 4100 MACARTHUR BLVD W 900 -T A 92660 949.J 215 1 1 00 F L 11 1 t j' 04 do li� "Iti Q, iu 5, SECTION A E I.' ti1�A - K, —C� � ..,� i I la PFt' LiTTI 77 IN ill SECTION B SECTIONS M,9.4W7 4..1 FM,MIA KK ,9 architects MR!il %"p t Iq 1:4;1:IT; if 11 "1"'ME- 2;'0"_b" i,�11,N211�111 IMILIziliT 21� u U 1111,11 01.0 UNTINGTON BEACH,CA I PROJECT FOR: COLOR LEGEND MATERIAL LEGEND �M...-A.....K.A, R. 4100 MA—THUR BLVD. A. DUNK EDWARDS I Metal Roof sui7E zoo DF ,9�207 Pecan VeneerNEWRoRT REACH. MFG: AEP Span 926— Style: Standing Seam B. DUNN EDWARDS Color., Her T��41.2 5 5, nlook Green F 47,245,.Voo" DEC; 769 Ranier White A 2. Stucco Finish DUNN EDWARDS MFG: La Habra [)E 5A36 Tortilla Finish: Fine Sand 3. Stone Veneer MGF: Coronado Style; Desert Ridge C016t: Chablis 2 4. Wood/Metal Rafters 8, Glazing 6. 'Light Fixture MFG: Sternberg Style: Tlniey 12.20 Color: DQrk Bronze C 7, Metal Trellis SITE FURNITURE 4P Li , : P. A. BENCH MFG; Keystone Ridge Designs Style: The Reading Serl.es A 6' Bench with Back 6 Color: Bronze B. LITTER RECEPTACLE EPTAC.LE MFG: Keystone Ridge. Designs Style: The Reading Series 32 gallon 3 Color: Bronze A C. BICYCLE RACKS 7 MFG: Keystone Ridge Designs Ag Style, The Reading Seri0s 2 sided-8 bike capacity C Color; Bronze -XTERIALS CD nog W�l • architects ATTACHMENT #7 Item 15. . 75 ins -442- CounciVAgency Meeting Heidi_ DeferredlContinued to: ©Approved ❑ConditioTi0yApproved 0 Denied City Clerk's Signature Council Meeting Date: July 5, 2011 Department 1D Number: CA'11-00.5 CITE(' OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Jennifer McGrath, City Attorney PREPARED BY: Jennifer McGrath, City Attorney SUBJECT: Set aside the City Gouncil's certification of the Senior Center Envtronrnental Impact Report(HEIR')No. 07-002 and issuance of the Conditional Use Permit ("CUP°) No. 07-M regarding the Senior Center in Central Park Statement of Issue: On March 4, 2008, Parks Legal Defense Fund and a number of s individuals (collectively"Parks')filed a lawsuit challenging the City's decision to build a Senior Center in Central Park. Parks' lawsuit contained the following four claims: first E claim under the Carifornia Environmental Quality Act('CEQX) asserting that the EIR failed to consider a reasonable range of alternatives to the project; second claim asserting that the November 2W6 election violated CEQA and the Ciity's Charter Section 612;third claim asserting a violation of the City's General Plan; and fourth claim asserting that the use of the Pacific City projects park in-lieu fees for funding the construction of the Senior Center violated the Quimby Act. On February 10, 2009, in a separate trial, the trial court denied Parks' Charter Section 612 claim. On December 15, 2009, after a second trial,the trial court entered a judgment in Parks'favor on the remaining claims. The City appealed and Parks filed a crass appeal on the Charter Section 612 claim. On December 13, 2010, the Court of Appeal issued its opinion, ruling in the City's favor on the Charter Section 612 and Quimby Act claims, but ruling in Parks'flavor on the EIR and General Plan claims. Financiallmyact: Not Applicable. Recommended Action: Motion to: Set aside the City Councii's certification of EIR No. 07-002 so that a subsequent EIR may be prepared and set aside the issuance of CUP No. 07-039 regarding the Senior Center in Central Park so that a General Plan Amendment may be processed. Alternative Action(s):Do not Set aside the City Council's certification of EiR No. 07-002 and issuance of CUP No. 07-039 regarding the Senior Center in Central Park, and direct City staff accordingly. ATTACHIMEENT NO.-IlL HB -443- Item 15. - 76 i i REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 71512011 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER, CA 11-005 Analysis:On March 4, 2008, Parks filed a lawsuit, challenging the Cites decision to build a s Senior Center in Central Park based on CEQA, Charter Section 612, the General Plan, and the Quirnby Act. In a February 10, 2009, separate trial, the trial court denied Parks relief on its Charter Section 612 claim. A trial on the remaining claims took place on August 6, ' 200.9. On December 15, 2009, the trial court enterers a judgment and a writ of mandate in Parks' favor on the remaining claims. The City appealed and Parks filed a cross appeal on the Charter Section 612 claim. On December 13, 2010, the Court of Appeal issued its opinion. The Court of Appeal ruled in the City's favor on the Charter Section 612 and Quimby Act claims. The Court of Appeal ruled in Parks' favor on the CEQA claim challenging the sufficiency of the EIR and the ' General Plan claim. Regarding the EIR, the Court of Appeal held that the EIR failed "to discuss the Mettler [School] site, as well as the other closets school sites that may have been available as alternative locations." (Attachment 1 [Court of Appeal Opinion, page 11].) The Court of Appeal also held that the EIR failed to address "whether use of all the [Quimby Act: in-lieu fees from the Pacific City project ($20 to $25 million) as funding for the [S]enior [C]enter was likely to affect the City's ability to acquire open land to replace the acreage lost by building the [Seenior [C]enter." (Attachment 1 [Court of Appeal Opinion, pages 12-13].) Regarding the CUP, the Court of Appeal held that the CUP violated the CKy's General Plan because the City's General Plan incorporated the Central Park. Master Plan which °designated the land where the [S]enior[C]enter is proposed to be built as a low intensity recreation area." (Attachment 1 [Court of Appeal Opinion, page 15].) Thus, the Court of Appeal ordered that the It]he certification of the EIR must be set aside" and "[t]he CUP must be set aside." (Attachment. 1 (Court of Appeal Opinion, page 20].) On February 16, 2011, the Court of Appeal seat the case back to the trial court On May 20, 2011, the trial court stated that ft would not relinquish its jurisdiction until the City Council complied with the Court of Appeal's opinion to set aside the certification of the El and issuance of the CUP. The trial court set a hearing date of July 12, 2011, for the City Council to take these actions. If the City Council sets aside the certification of the EIR and issuance of the CUP, the trial court will relinquish its jurisdiction of this lawsuit. If the City Council fails to set aside the certification of the EIR and issuance of the CUP by the July 12, 2011, hearing the trial court wish continue to maintain its jurisdiction of this lawsuit and most likely restrain the City from taking any action on the EIR and the CUP. Environmental Status: City staff anticipates presenting a subsequent EIR and General Plan Amendment to the Planning Commission at the end of the year and to the City Council early next year. Strateaic Plan Goal: Improve Internal and External Communication Attachment{§}: 1. Court of Appeal Opinion, dated December 13, 2010 AT T M EN T N 0. . Item 15. - 77 HB -444- i E f I 1 HB -445- Item 15. - 78 C NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS Caiifomia I�Ubes df Court ruie 8.1145(a),prohlhifs CAA and roes frorn citing or retping on opinions not c® for publication or ordered{s[blisfted,except as sPecifled by rui¢&.11't�bl. Tffes opinion fu-+s rretbeen cstEified:fur puhlicaban or ordered PuWested fpr pu oses of nde 8.1 ciS, IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT (XSt1RT 0FAppmj-- rnST t) 3 DIVISION THREE ILED DEC 13 Zola PAID LEGAL DEFENSE FUND et al., Plaintifrs and Appellants, GO43109 V. (Super. Ct No.30-2008-00051261) THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OPINION at a1., Defendants and Appellants. Appeals from a judganent of the Superior Court of Orange County,David C.Velasgnez,Judge_ A€fraed in pant, reversed in part. 7ennifer McCn-4th,City Attorney, Scott F.Field,Assistant City Attorney and John M.Fujii Deputy City Attorney;Gxeines,Martin,Stein&RicWaad and Alison. M.Turner for Defendants and Appellants. Poole&Shaffery,Law Office of Mark J. Skapik,Mark C.A11ert III and Gezalyn L.Skapik for Plaintiffs and Appellants. ATTACHMENTIN0. LIU Item 15. - 79 HB -446- j sj Parks Legal Defense fund and a munrkber of individuals(collectively Parks) filed a petition for a writ of mandate(petition} seelang injunctive and declaratory relief challenging the City of Huntington Beach's(the City)decision to build a senior center an open land in:Central Park.-The petition contained four causes ofaation- As to the second cause of action,the superior cotu t denied petitioner's request to require the voters to approve the project a second time,as timo-barred. The court granted Parks'request for relief on the remaining causes of action. Parks and the City each appeal from the part(s) of the judgment adverse to their position. 1 FACTS In line 2005,the City hired as architectural firm to study the feasibility of constructing and operating anew senior center based upon the growth of the City's scior population. The City anticipated a 64 percent increase in the senior population to over 50,000 by 2010. The March 2006 feasibility study concluded a building in excess of 45,E square feet would be required to meet the Deeds of the senior community. The preferred site for the senior center is in the City's Central Park. Before the City may conskrttmt in a city park any building in excess of 3,000 square feet or at a cost of more than$100,000,the City Charter regLdres an"afFkmative vote of at least a majority of the electors voting on such proposition at a general or ' speeial_election of which such proposition ik submitted." (HS.Charter, §612(b).) On July 17, 2006,the City ordered Measure T placed on the ballot The ballot measure read:- "Shall a centrally located senior center building,not to exceed 47,000 square feet,be placed on a m=imum of five acres of an undeveloped 14-acre parcel in the 356-acre Huntington Beacb Central Parr generally located west of the intersection of Goldeawest ' I Street and Talbert Avenue,between the disc golf course and Shipley hlatme.Center, following Cfty Council approval of all entitlements and enviramxentai resew?" (Italics ATTACH MIENT NO. 2 1413 -447- Item 15. - 80 omitted.) The Huntington Beach voters passed the measure on November 7,20►06. The City subsequently began its environmental impact study. Earlier that year,on October 16, 2006,the City-entered into an agreement with the developer of the Pacific City Project,Makalon Atlanta Hmtffigton Beach,LLC. (developer),whereby the developer would construct the proposed senior ceriter with,in- lieu fees assessed pursuant to the Quimby Act. (Gov. Code, §66477 et seq-) Under the Quimby Act,a city may require a developer to dedicate an anount of land or pay fees in- I lieu thereof for park or recreational purposes as a condition to the approval of a tentative map or parcel map. (Gov. Code, §66477,subd.(a)) The Pacific City Project involved the proposed construction ofa 165 room bout1q e hotel, 163,000 square feet of retail stores, 12,W0 square feet of restaurants, a 2.0 acre open spacelpark,and 516 condominium units in the 'Main-pier sub-area of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment Pxaject='adjacenxt to Pacific Coast Highway. The proposed senior center location is a straight-line distance of 2.95 miles from the northwest corner of the Pacific City Project. On February 20,2007,the City contracted EIP Associates/PB S&J to prepare an environmental impact report(EIR)for the new senior cuter on a five-acre site within the 356-ace Huntington Central Park. The City gave notice can September 17, 2007,that a draft EIR had been prepared fur an approximately 45,000 square feet sennior center can undeveloped land within Central Park and of the public comment period. The Iocation was zoned as a low intensity recreation area,which permitted"baibeque and picnic amendities,a restroom,tot-lot, open turf area, and parking uses" A number of individuals voiced their opposition to the project and EM Opposition grounds included the failure to consider alternative sites and that the proposed in-lieu fzmding violated the Quimby Act. The City's plat *commission certified the final EIR and approved a conditional wise pernit(CUP)on December 11, 2007. The final EIR connsistW of the draft EM with text clanges and responses to comments. The mayor appealed the 3 ATTACHMENT NO. Item 15. - 81 HB -448- f dwisim On February 4,2008,after a public bearing on the appeal,the city council voted to approve the resolution certifying the final OR.and approved the CUP for the senior center. Parks fled a petition on March 4, 2008. The petition alleged the City's certification of the EIR violated the Califomia Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)(Pub. Resources Code,§21000 et seq.),'-inter alia,in that it famed to consider"a reasonable range of altemativ&'including possible school sites drat became available after the draft EIR was prepared,but before certification of the final EIP- Tbe:second cause of action-alleged the City violated CEQA.and City Charter section 612 by purporting to approve the project without voter approval as required by the City Charter. The petition alleged the voters' action in approving M=uxe T in 2006 was not final approval. The third cause of aeon alleged the City violated its general plan and failed to modify the general plan or its zoning ordinance to E accommodate The proposed senior center_ The fourth cause of action sought declaratory relief and alleged the City's intended use of park in-lieu fees to fund w struction of the proposed senior center violated the Quimby fact. The superior eourt bifurcated the trial on the petition. On February 19, 2409,the court held the second cause of action was time-barred under section 21167, subdivision(a) and Government Code section.65009,subdivision(c)(1). It.found that in c..eafafybg the EIR the Cjty abused its discretion by failing to proceed,in the manner provided by lave and the City's findings regarding the lack of feasible alternative sites lacked substautial evidcnt e. The court also found the Elk Med to discuss the consequences to the City of open space park land and the loss of finds to replace the land because the City planned to divert the in-lieu ftrnds to finance the senior center rather than replenish the lost open space. The carat also found the CLIP was issued in violation r All further st tatory references are to the Public Resources Code,unless otherte stated. 4 HB -449- Item 15. - 82 of the City's general plan. Lastly,the court found that use of iu-lien funds front the Pacific City project to finance the senior citizen center violated the Quimby Act because (1)the f4ads were act intended to be used to provide forpark and open space land, and (2)using the entire in:-lieu fee to pay for IGO percent o:f the cost of buckling the senior citizen center bare no reasonable relationship to the degree to which the future inhabitants, of the Pacific City project would use the center. The court found that in all other respects,the City did not abuse its discretion in cerpfying the EIR, The court directed the City to set aside and vacate the EIR.for the proposed . senior outer in Central,Parr,all actions of the city council on Feburary 4,2:009 regarding the proposed senior center,and the isnmce of the CUP. : he court further found the senior center may not be,funded by the in-lieu fees without violating the Quimby Act and the City's enabling ordinance,Huntington Beach Mmicipal Code section 2.54.08. II DISCUSSION A- Mules AppUcable to CEQ-4 Review "CEQA is a comprehensive scheme designed to produce long-term protection to the envioromment. [Citation.}:: (Afowffain Sian Foundation v. Fish& Game Come. (1997) 16 Cd.4th 105, 11.2.) The Legrslaturehas enacted CEQA Guidelines to be followed in the!process. (Cal.Code Regs.,tit. 14, § 15000 et seq-f "These Guidelines are binding on all public.agencies in California." (Guidelines, §.15000.) CEQA requires "that major consideration is given to preventing environmental damage,while providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every Californian-" (§21000,SUM. (g).) The public policy behind CEQA includes the idea"that ptwlic agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effscts z All references to"Guidelines"are to the State CEQA guidelines,which implement CEQA. (Cal. Code Rep-,tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.) 5 Item 15. - 83 HB -450- I of such projects. . . Q 21002.) CEQA.therefore requires the public agency to "mitigate or avoid the significant effeets on the enviromnent of projects tl Z it carries out or approves whenever it is feasible to do so." (§21002.1,subd. (b).) The"heart and soul of CEQA"is the EDL (Planning&Conservation League v Department of Water Resources(2000)83 CaLAppAth 892,911.) "Whenever a project may have.a significant and adverse physical effect on the environment, an OR must be prepared and certified. [Citations.]" (Afozxtain Lion Foundation v.Fish& Game Com.,Wa, 16 Cal.4th at p. 113.) The EWs fiuuction is"to identify the. significant affects on the environment of a project,to idea fy alternatives to the project, and to indicate the mamer in which those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided." (§21002.1,subd.(a).) Additonally,the Elk"inform[s]the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences oftheir decisions before they are made. Thus,the OR `protect not only the enviromnent but also informed self-government.' [Citation.]" (Citizens of Meta Valley v_Board of Supervisors(1990) 52 Cal.3d 553,564(Goleta R).) Our review of the City's cerbifieation of the EIR for the senior centcr is"limited to deciding`whether there was a prejudicial abuse of discretion. . . [which]is established if the agency has not pru ded in a marmer rem red by lave or if the determination or decision is not supported by substantial evidence.' [Citation.]" (Santiago County Water .Dist. v C<r�.af.'Orange.(19,8f)119 Cal- pp.3d.818, 823-) "Generally spearing,an- agency's failure to comply with the procedural requirements of CEQA is prejudicial when the violation thwarts the act's goals by precluding informed decisionmaking and public participation. [Citations.]„ (Serra Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for- Responsible Education v San Lorenzo Valley Unified (2000 139 Ca1.App.4th 1356, 1375.) `"Substantial evidence is defined as `enough relevant infom ation and reasonable ieferences from[the information supplied by the EIR]that a i I fair argument can be made to support a conclusion,even though other conclusions might 1-113 -45 l- Item 15. - 84 also be reached"' [Citations.] . . . "Substantial evidence shall include facts,reasonable assumptions predicted oza facts, and expert opinion supported by facts."' [Cit;3Eon_] `In i detenninin whether substantial evidence supports a finding,the court may not w sidet or reevaluate the evidence presented to the administrative agency, [Citation.] All conflicts in the evidence and any reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor of the agency's findings and decision. [Citation.) [JR In applying that standard,rather than the less deferential independent judgment test,"the reviewing court must resolve reasonable doubts in favor of the admkds ive findings and decision.."' [Citation.]" (Uphold Our Heritage v. Town of Woodside(2007)147 Cal.App.4th 587, 5.96.);In any action reviewing a public agency's decision relating to a CEQA-determination,"t'he court shall not exercise its independent judgment on the evidence but shall only detennie whether the act or decision is supported by substantial evidence in the light of the whole record." ( 21168.) "fA]c©urt's proper role in reviewing a challenged EIR is not to dztermirte whether the EIR's ultimate conclusions are correct but only whether the Elk is sufficient as an informational document. [Uttation.]" (Laurel ReightrImprovementAssn v. Regents W L*Aersity of California(1988)47 CaDd 376,407(Laurel Heights).) "We may not, in sum, substitute our judgment for that of the people and their local representatives. We can and must, however,scrupulously enforce all legislatively mandated CEQA requirements." (Goleta H,supra,52 C.al3d at p_,564.) . 13. Sgvcienc_y of the m 1.. Ahetmtive Sites "Me core of an Ea is the mitigation and alternatives section." (GoWa H, supra,52 Cal.3 d at p.564.) The petition asserted and the supe aor court found that the EIR failed to adequately discuss feasible alternative sites for the senior center. The draft EIR considered the following possible altematives to the project: (1)continued uses 7 ATTA EENT N 0. F Item 15. - 85 1413 -452- allowed.by the general and master plans,which would prohibit building the senior center in due pant;(2)reducing the size of the proposed senior center from 45,000 to 30,000 square feet and building the center at the location of the Rogers Senior Center;{3) development of"multiple,smaller-scale senior centers throughout the City";and(4)an alternative site fbi the senior center again in Central Park;at the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street. The proposed locationn for the senior center and the alternative site each consist of open space in Central Parr Although the initial feasibility study conducted in 2006 acknowledged the potential use of closed school sites as altemative locations for the wmor center?the EIR did toot discuss the use of such sites as alternative locations. A number of citizens voiced their concern about the draft MU s failure to consider closed school sites,including the Kettier School property,as possible altemative locations for the senior center. The 2006.initial feasibility study spedfiically discussed the Kettler School site. "Ibe study noted that"[g]ivw the significant amount of acreage, the option exists to develop either the main campus.. . or the school play fields 4acent to Edison Park,.. ." The response(sce Guidelines,§ 15088,subd_(a))to the suggestion of the citizens was: "The school district board has-not yet declared the Kettler School property surplus. Therefore,the City does not have the option to purchase the property under the Naylor Act. Consepently,the Draft EIR did not evaluate this property as an -alternative,site because the CiWs ability to purchase it-is speculative." "Au EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project,or to the location of the project,which would feasibly attain mast of the basic objectives of the project,and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives." (Guidelines, §§ 15126_C subd.(a), 15354.) "`A local agency must make an initial determination as to which alternatives are feasible and which are trot. [Citation.] If an alternative is identified as at leastpatentWly feasible,an in-depth discussion is required. [Citation.] On the other hand,when:the infeasibility of an alternative is readily apparent,it',need not _ 8 HB -453- Item 15. - 86 be extensively cousidered.."' [Citation.] `Even as to alternatives that are rejected, however,the`SIR must explain why each suggested alternative either does not satisfy t the goals of the proposed project does not offer substantial environmental advantagesGj or cannot be accomplished-` [Citation.j" (Center for Biological Divmity v Sara $en2ardino(2010) 185 Cal.AppAth 866, 883, italics added.) The Kettler School site had aspects that recommend it as a possible alternative site for tbeproject. According to the City's 2006 initial feasibility study, Kettler School would accommodate the proposed building,exterior,programs, and fut= expansion. It has paring;would benefit from being close to Edison Park,is adjaccato compatible path cases,has significant vegetation,mature trees,and has potential compatibility with the Edison Community Center. Because it has already been developed,building the senior center at the school site would arguably reduce certain adverse environmental impacts that would occur with building the center in the park (§21002; Guidelines, § 15126,6,subds. (a),(b).) "[T]he discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the athin meat oftheprojmt objectives,orwould be m re costly." (Craidelines, § 15126.6,snbd.(b).) Thus,if feasible,the EIR should have discussed the alternative in detail. (Goleta H,supra,52 Cal3d at p. 566[EIR must consider altemat ve location which offers substantial environmental advantage-and may be feasibly accomplished].) The question then,is whether the Kettler School was a feasible alternative site within the meaning of CEQA. More specifically,given the favorable information relating to that site in the initial feasibility study, did the fact that the school district had not declared Kettler School as surplus property at the time of the draft EIR make the site infeasible? TT ACHMENT NO. Item 15. - 87 HB -454- The Naylor Act(Eck. Code,§§ 17485 et seq.,formerly Ed..Code, §§ 39390 et seq.)"governs the disposal of certain kinds of surplus school property? (City of i Ikorpark v..Moorpark Un fied School Dist. (1991)54 Cal3d 921,923) "The net effect of the Act is to make surplus school property available to local communities at less than present market value,while assuring that participating school districts recover at least the cost of acquiring the property." ad.at pp.923-924) If a school district decides to sell cr � I lease surplus property,that land must fast be offered to the city in which it is situated. (Ed.Code, § 174S9,subd. (a).) Vrth certain allowances,the sale price may not exceed the school district's cost of acquisition,and may bb as low as 25 percent of market value. (EcL Code,§ 17491,subd.(a).) For CEQA purposes,"'[f easible' means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time,taking into account economic, environmental,social,and technological factors." (§21061.1) The fact that the City did not own a particular parcel of property at a given moment does not necessarily make ffie i i location an infeasible alternative. CEQA does not require the alternative be immediately available, only that it be"capable of berg accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time." (§21061.1.) Whether an alternative site is owned by the proponent of the project is"simply a facW to be considered in determining feasibility. (Goletal7,supra, 52 Cal.3d atp. 575,fn.7;Guidelines,§1.5126.6,subd.(f)(1) [whether site is owned.by proponent is-"[ajmong thLr&ctors-brat may be taken into account whin the feasibility of alternatives'J.) In Goleta ft',the oomt recognized that even in situations where the proponent of a prof ect is a private party that owns the proposed location of a project,there still may be cases"in which the consideration of alternative sites is necessary and proper." (Galeia,fl,supra,52 CAM at p.575_) Those instances are necessarily increased when the proponent is a governmental agency. "Understandably, the government's power of eminent domain and access to public lands suggest that alternative sites may be more feasible,more often,when the developer is a public rather 10 ATTACHMENT NO. �, 3 xs -455- Item 15. - 88 than a private agency' (M. at p. 574) The guidelines require the EIRto discuss "acquisition"when relevant (Guidelines, § 15126; see San Bem ardino Valley Audubon Society,Inc. v. County of Scan Bernxdino(1984) 155 Cal.App.3d 738,751 [EIR defective for failure to discuss possibility of land trade between private developer and United States Forest Service].) The City argue the possibility of acquiring any of the school sites was too speculative to require in-depth discussion by the EIl2,because the school district had not offered to sell surplus property and the City's ability to purchase such property,even at (well)below market rates was uncertain. Had the City inquired of the schooLdistrict and been informed the locations are not for sale,1he point might be well taken. However,it does not appear the City ever inquired. The latter claim—the City's ability to purchass school sites at below market rates was uncertain,---rings hollow,given the City's Decembcr 3,2007 decision to approve its November 2007 surplus school property purchasing plan,which included a recommeudationto purchase 7.73 acres of the Kettler School property, a total of 24.6 acres from three other school sites,and directed the City's staff to update the plan as new sites are identified as surplus. Given the fact that the Mettler School site may have been available at well below market value--not to mention the fact that the site had been considered as a potential site in the initial feasibility study—it must be concluded the site was at least "potentially feasible." The.EIR's failure to discuss the Kettler,site,as well=as the other closed school sites that may have been available as alternative locations rendered the E1R ' deficient as an informative document. (Goleta II,sutra,52 Cal.3d at p.564.) As a result,the City's rertificaticm of the final ElR was a prejudicial abuse of discretloo, requiring the certification be set aside. 11 Item 15. - 89 HB -456- 2. Failure to Consider Loss of Open Land or Purchase of Open Land The superior court found the Ea failed to accurately describe the project in that the City incorrectly presumed the land in Central Park upon which the smior center is to be constructed"Eras no Value, is umderused land,is suaplus land, or is vacant land. However,the City's General Ilan and its Central Park plan demonstrate the importance to the City ofpark land and open space land within the city." The court noted that if the City were to we all the in lieu funds from the P acific City proj ect to build the senior center,.the net result is a loss of open-space not only within Central Park,but also within the City as a whole. Tbp FMZ.failed to discuss the environmental impact to the park and the city caused by the redirection of the in-lieu fiords away from the purchase of open: space toward construction of the senior center. We ogee with the City that the EIR adequately described the lass of open space in Central Park. The EIR did not,however,discuss the loss of open:space throughout the City,caused by the CiVs use of all the Quimby Act funds to construct the s,niorcertter instead of creating more open space. (S=Guidelines, § 15131.) With regard to the lass of open space,the EIR states: "Currently,231 acres, or 65 percent,of Central park are developed yr planned for use as passive recreational areas. The change from:passive to active at the project site would represent a 2 percent reduction of passive recreational space in Central lark_ . . ." It also observed that building the senior center in the park would`reduc{e]the arnount of Tiadeveloped open space within Central Park"and concluded, "[tjbis would be considered a sigdficant cumulative irnpact of the proposed project." As noted above,the City did approve a plan in December 2007 to purchase surplus school property. The purchase of 10.6 acres for park open space was included in the plan. Tbat plan which might have provided an alterrtative-site for the senior center was not included in the EIR. 'fire EIR should have addressed whether use of all the in- lieu fees from the Pacific City project($20 to$25million)as funding for the senior center 12 HB -457- Item 15. - 90 was likely to affect the City's ability to acquire open land to replace the acreage cast by building the senior center. 3. The Raptors(.Birds ofPrey) The EIR found`f d]eveiopment of the proposed project would have a substantial adverse impact to raptor foraging habitat"and urged implementation of a mitigation measure that included"dedication as open space,conservation and/or enhancing areas of raptor foraging habitat at a ratio of l:1 for acres of impact on raptor foraging habitat to provide suitable habitat values and:Functions for raptors." The mitigation measum further provided that enhamemeut"would include,but not be limited to,the planting of native trees vi thin and adjacent to conserved areas of raptor foraging habitat." Parks contends that as it relates to the issue of the impact an raptors,the EIR was defective because there was no evidence the mitigation measure wit/mitigate the impact on the raptors. It is not the City's burden to demonstrate.the mitigation measure was suffici=L As we have stated before, "Where an EIR is challenged as being legally inadequate, a court presumes a public agezrey's decision to certify the EIR is conwt;thereby iuVosing on a party challenging it the burden of establishing otherwise. i [Citations.]" (SYa7a Club v. City of Orange(2009) 163 Cal..AppAth 523, 530.) Parks has not carried its burden on this issue. C. Mearure T Statute of Limitations The second cause of action alleged the City violated CEQA and section 612 of the City's Charter by"parporting to finally approve the project without a Note of the people as required by"section 612 ofthe City's Charter. As noted above,the issue was put to the voters in 2006 as Measure T and was approved by the vot=on November 7,2006. That vote was without benefit of au EIR, Ifthe vote was an approval 13 ATTACHMENT NO. Item 15. - 91 HB -458- i cf a"project"for CEQA purposes,section 21167, subdivision(a)required any action to be filed widda 180 days of the approval,a date that expired prior to the filing of the present petition. As a public agency generated initiative,Measure T was not exempt from, CEQA compliance. (Friends of Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra,Madre (2001)25 CalAth 165, 171.) The vote committed time City to going forward with the project The petition, claiming an PIR was required before putdnng the matter to a vote,was not filed unw March 2€108, and is untimely under section 21167. That section requires an action alleging"that a public agency is carrying out or has approved a project thu ruay have a significant effort on the environment without having determined whether the,project may have a significant effect on the environment shall be commenced within 180 days from the date of the public agency's decision to carry out or approve the project." (§21167, subd.(a).) To the extent the second cause of action challenges the CUP on they ground that the voters were not provided an EIR,before Measure T was voted on,Patks challenges the City's"proceedings,acts or determinations taken,done;or made prior to" the issuance of the CUP. (Gov-Code,65009,subd- (c)(1)(F).) That being the case,the cause of action accrued in 2006,when the City put Measure T on the ballot Section 65009's time-limit,90 days,expired prior to the filing of the instant petition in NO& (Gov. Code, § 65009, subd.(c)(1).) According,the trial court did not err in concluding the second cause of action was time.-barred:, D. The CT)P and Violation of the City's General Plan Govemment Code section 65300 requires every city to"adapt a comprehensive,long-term general plan for the physical development of the. . . city." The general plant roust include: "A land use element that designates the proposed general distribution,and general location and extent of the uses of the land for housing, business, industry,open space,including agriculture,natral resources,recreation, and c joyment 14 '@' p�ACq 7 7YIf1 1 MEENT f it e � f xB -459- Item 15. - 92 of scenic beauty,education,public buildings and grounds,solid and liquid waste disposal facilities, and other categories of public and private ups of land." (Gov. Code, § 65302, i i sulsd- (a).) As we observed in Endangered Habitats League,-bw v. County of Orange (2005) 131 Cal.AppAth 777, "The general plan functions as a"`constitution for all future developments,"' and land use decisions must be consistent with the general plan and its elements. [Citation.]" (Id-at p. 782.) A project must be compatible with the policies and objectives of the general plan,but"Nerfect confomrity is nett requiired." (]bid.) "We review decisions regarding consistency with a general plan under the arbitrary and capricious standard, These are quasi-legislative.acts.reviewed.by ordinary mandamus,and the inquixy is whether the decision is arbitrary,capricious, entirely lacking in evidentiary supper unlawful, or procedurally unfazr. [Citations.] Under-this standard,we defer to an agency's factual foaling of consistency unless no reasonable person could have reached the same conclusion on the evidence before it. [Citation.]" (Endangered Habitats League,Inc.v. County of Orange,supra, 131 Cal.App Ath at p. 782,fin.omitted.) The superior court found the CUP violated the City's general plan. That plan.requires "structures located in the City's parks and open spaces be designed to maintain the environmental character in which they are located"(FIuntington Beach General Plan,LU 14.1.3,11-LU-44,and the City to acquire and develop its"paxb in accordance with the Packs and Recreation Element of the,Genwal Plan.." (Runfinon Beach General plan,LU 14.1.5,11-LU-44.) The recreation element of the general plan, recognizes"[a]ll designated park lands need to be preserved with proper land use designation,." (Huntington Beach General Plan,MI RCS-6.) The recreation element further required development of system wide parks and recreation master plan "incoFpora.te[iag]the Central Park Master Plan." (Huntington Beach General Plan,I- RSC 4, 11T RCS-17.) 1 e Central Park master plan in turn designated the land where the senior center is proposed to be built as a low intensity recreation area,which would 15 ATTACHMENT , Item 15. - 93 HB -460- . j permit picnic and barbeque arrxezti.ties,tot-lot,resuoorns,open turf area, and parking uses. The project would result in high m1 sity use. The City claims that while it reoognizes the project is inconsistent with the love intensity designation by the Central Park master plan,the park's general plan is not part of the City's general plan,and an amendment of the park plan afLvr issuance ofthe CUP to bring the CUP into compliance with the parr general plan is permissible. it is not, The+C ity's general plan specifically required the parks and recreation master plan to incorporate the Central Park Waster plan. As stated above,aScueral.plan fustetions as a constitition for all future developments,and compliance with the Central Park master plari was,in effect,constitutionally compelled. The gover=ent may not justify the violation of a constitutionally compelled provision bec acme it intends to subsequently amend its constitution. It must comply with the law as presently enacted. The trial court properly found the CUP violated the City's general plan. E. Declaratoty Relief(QuirnbyXcs) Subject to conditions not present here,"[tjhe legislative body of a city or county may,by ordinance,require the declteation of land or impose a requirement of the payment of fees in lieu thereof or a combination of boils,for park or recreational purposes as a condition of the approval of a1=ttative map or parcel map." (Gov. Code, § 66477,subd.(a).) "This section shall be known. . .as the Quimby Act." (Gov.,Code, § 66477, subd. (g). The purpose of Quimby Act in-lieu fees is to'xnaivtairr and preserve open space for the recreational use of the residents of new subdivisions." (Home BuildersAssn.of Tulare&&i g Caunue,s,,Ira-v. City gfLemoore(2010) 195 Cal.App.4th 554, 566.) The City's Quimby Act ordinance declares the City has determined"[hat the public inter convenience,healtk safety and welfare require five acres of property for ATTACHNUENT NO. HB -461- Item 15. - 94 each 1,000 persons residing within the City be devoted to local park and recreational purposes." (HmTdngton Beach.Zoning and Subdivision Ord., §254.08C) As stated above,the City intends to fund construction of the new 45,000 square foot senior center,including banquet facilities and meeting rooms,with all or substantially all of the$20 to$25 zrtil ioa iu-lieu fees from the pacific City Project_ The superior court granted Park's request for declaratory relief and held use of the i n lieu i funds violates the Quimby Act for"for two reasons: Firstly,the hinds are not intended by the City to be used to provide for park and open space,and secondly,using the entire [sum of] in Lieu fees-w pay-for 100-Lpgrcent] of the-cost to build the senior corer bears no reasonable relationship to[the] degree to which the proposed senior center will be used by the future inhabitants of the Pacific City project_" The court also found"the proposed senior center baikling and its intended usage does not satisfy the customary notion of a park." The City contends the Quimby Act dues not require use of fees toward what would customarily be considered a park, the senior center is a recreational facility, the Quimby Act expressly authorizes use of in-lieu fees for the development of recreation facilities,and the senior center would serve Pacific City residents. We need not address these issues because we agree with the City's contention that Par"' declaratory relief action is time-barred_ Goverumeat Code section 66499.37 provides, "Any action or proceeding to attack;review,set aside,,void,or amul the decision,of an advisory agency,appeal board, or legislative body emceming a subdivision,or of any of the proceedings,acts, or determinations taken,done,or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonabkness, legality, or validity ofany condition attached thereto,including,but not limited to, the approval,of a tentative map or.final map, shall not be maintained by any person unless the action or proceeding is commenced and service of summons effected within.90 days air the date of the decision. Thereafter all persons are barred from any action or proceeding or any defense of invalidity or unreasonableness of ale decision or 17 ATTACHMENT NO. '/, P6 Item 15. - 95 HB -462- of the proceedings,acts,or detemiirnations. The proceeding shall take precedence over all matters of the calendar of the court except criminals probate,eminent domain,forcible entry,and unlaEwU detainer proceedings." (Italics added.) The City issued the CUP for construction of the senior center on February 4,ZOOS. The aril court found the issuance of that CUP triggered the 90-day period under Government Code section 66499-37 and thus,Parks' petition was timely filed. Here the trial court erred. While the CUP was the triggering event for purposes of other issues raised in the pedtion,it was not the triggering event for purposes of determining the propriety of the Qui€uby Act provision imposed on the developer of the Pacific Center in 2006. 4 In Timberidge Enterprises, Ine-v. City of eta Rosa(1978)86 Ca1.App.3d I 873(T&nberidge Enterprises,Inc. the City of Santa Rosa enacted a resolution adopting a school impact fee that could be imposed upon the city's approval of a subdivision,map. The purpose of the fee was to alleviate overcrowding of schools caused by a new subdivision. The City of Santa Rosa imposed the fees on the plaintiffs as a condition of its approval of subdivisions to be developed by the plaintiffs. (a at p.877.) The plaintiffs brought an action to declare the resolution and the fees imposed invalid. (Ih d.) The City of Santa Rosa contended the action was untimely under Coverruneat Code section 66499.37. (Timberidge,enterprises,Inc.,nprci,_86 Cal.App.3d at p. 985.) The superior court rejected that argument and,concluded the;- statute did not wmmence to nun until such time as the fees were paid. The appellate court.reversed. It found the event that triggered the conunencemeut of the time period set fortis in Govamment Code section 66499.37 was the approval of the subdivision map with attached condition. (Id. at p. 986.) "If the condition, as here,shall be that school impact fees.be thereafter paid upon applications for permits to build upon the subdivision's lots,the statute's pim- .eat is that an attack m tine validity of the City's decision,and its attending condition,be made within the designated period. Upon 18 AT TAC 91 ARE N IN0 HB -463- Item 15. - 96 failure of interested parties to do so,the validity of the condition is normally placed beyond legal attack. And here,it will be remembered,plaintiffs' claim of right to recover school impact fees paid is founded solely on the premise of the related condition's invalidity! ()bid.) Like the appellate court in Timberidge Enterprises,Inc.,"we discern a patent legislative objective that the validity of such decisions of a local legislative body, or its advisory agency,be Judicially determined as expeditioasly as is consistent with the: mquiretnents of due process." (Timberidge Enterprises,.Inc.,supra, 86 Cal.App.3d at p. 886.) Indeed,,sixice Timberidge Enterprise.,.Inc. was decided,the Legislature shortened the time frame in wWch challenges may be made to such decisions from 180 days to 90 days. (See Historical and Statutory Notes,36E Rrest's Ann_ Gov. Code(2009 ed.)fall. § 66499,37.p.382_) In Soderling v. City of Santa Monica(1983) 142 Cal-App-3d 501,a developer challenged a condition imposed on the approval of a tentative tract znap. The map and condition were approved on.June 5, 1978,and the city subsequently gave the developer a 12-mouth extmsion of the tentative map. (Id. at pp. 503-504.) The developer's subsequent action challenging the cW s 1980 denial of a final map,due to his failure to comply with the condition imposed in connection with the tentative map, was found to be untimely, (Id, at p. 505.) "The purpose of a conditional tentative map is to identify clearly the requirements to which a developer must coufotm; hence,he must demonstrate in his final map that he has resolved all of the deficiencies or problems enumerated in the tentative map. [Gitaffon] rn other words, fulfillment of all tentative map conditions is,from the outset,a condition of final map approval. [Citations.]" (Ibid.) On October 16,2006,the City approved the owner participation agreement with the developer and the tentative tract map for the Pacific City development,a condition of which was the use of Quimby Act in-lieu funds for construction of a new 19 Tf z �� � I a Item 15. - 97 1413 -464- senior center on City owned property. If Parks was to challenge the in-lieu condition of that map,Government Code section 6649937 required Parks to make 6e challenge within 90 days of the imposition of that condition,or not at all. 7 ' 1 F. Conctusion The certification of the EIR must be set aside because the EIR did not consider feasible alternative sites or whether the use of all the Quimby Act fees to fund construction of the senior center adversely impacts the CWs ability to acquire open space wiffim the City. lbe CUP must be set aside because it violates the City's general Plan. The challenge to the use of Quimby Act funds to finance constmction of the senior center is titzme-barred,as is the challenge involving Measure T. lII DISPOSITION The.judg=nt is of mcd except with regare to the declaratory relief action, which is reversed. Each party will.bear their oven costs on appeal. I i MOORE,7. E CONCUR: i OTEARY,AC ING P.J. i IKOLA,1. 20 ATTA'C'MMEN'T N( 75 HB -465- Item 15. - 98 C7043109 Parks Legal Defense Fund et al.v.The City ofHutttington Beach et aL Superior Court of Orange County Jennifer Michelle McGrath j City Huntington Beak& 2000 Main Street P.O.Box 190 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Alison M Turner Crreines,Martin,Stein-&Richland 5900 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 375 Los Angeles,CA 90036-3697, Mark Clifford.Allen Ill Poole & Shaffery 00 Law Office of Mark 1. Skapk AFC 250 W.First St., Suite 330 Claremont,CA 91711 The Attmity General Office Consumer Law Section 13001 Street Sacratztcm,CA 95814 ATTAGIANIEN."T NO, - 1 Item 15. - 99 HB -466- ATTAC H M E N T #8L] City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department J1 - ST.A►:FF RIEPOR.T Hl1NT1NGTON 8f0.CH - - � -� - - TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott Hess, AICP, Director of Planning BY: Jennifer Villasenor, Senior Planner DATE: January 24, 2012 SUBJECT: SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 07-002 (HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER) APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LOCATION: 18041 Goldenwest Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (5-acre site southwest of the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue) STATEMENT OF ISSUE: o Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002 (SEIR No. 07-002): - Analyzes the proposed construction and operation of an up to 45,000 square foot one-story senior recreation facility on a 5-acre undeveloped site in Central Park. - Documents potential impacts to aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, public services, recreation, transportationitraffic and utilities and service systems. - Evaluates seven alternatives to the proposed project. - Concludes that the Alternative Central Park Site is the environmentally superior alternative. - Concludes that all potential project impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels. - Concludes that there will be cumulative significant and unavoidable impacts to aesthetics. - Responds to the California Court of Appeals ruling regarding the adequacy of the previously certified EIR No. 07-002 and addresses specific issues raised in the court's decision. Staff s Recommendation: - Certify Subsequent EIR No. 07-002 (Attachment No. 2)because it adequately analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the project, identifies project alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with General Plan policies and has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and California Court of Appeals ruling. Item 15. - 101 HB -468- RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Certify Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002 as adequate and complete in accordance with CEQA requirements by approving Resolution No. 1659 (Attachment No. 1)." ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A. "Continue certification of SEIR No. 07-002 and direct staff accordingly." B. "Deny certification of SEIR No. 07-002 with findings for denial." PROJECT PROPOSAL: Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 07-002 represents an analysis of potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of an up to 45,000 square foot senior recreation facility on a 5-acre site within Huntington Central Park. The 5-acre project site will comprise the senior center building, parking lot and open space area. The approximately 45,000 square foot building consists of a community hall/dining room, group exercise, fitness and dance rooms, multi- use classrooms, a kitchen, a social lounge and administrative offices. The outdoor open area includes a patio with a decorative trellis, an expansive lawn, a garden, a fountain, benches and a natural meadow. Ingress and egress to and from the site is proposed via a planned access driveway with entry gate at the existing Goldenwest Street/Talbert Avenue intersection. An existing traffic signal at this location will be modified for traffic to enter and exit the project site. The SEIR also analyzes a proposed General Plan Amendment, which involves incorporating the Central Park Master Plan into the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan and updating the Central Park Master Plan of Uses to change the 5-acre senior center site from a low intensity to high intensity recreation area. The SEIR provides a discussion of impacts by issue area and provides mitigation measures, where necessary to reduce environmental impacts. Specific issue areas discussed in the SEIR include: aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic and utilities and service systems. An analysis of alternatives to the proposed project and long-term implications resulting from project implementation are also provided. The SEIR consists of two volumes. Volume 1 is the Draft Subsequent EIR and Technical Appendices that were circulated for a minimum 45-day public review period. Volume 2 is titled the Final Subsequent EIR and includes continents received during the public review period, responses to those comments and text changes to the Draft SEIR (Volume 1) to clarify or correct information in response to comments or identified as necessary by staff. These volumes are referenced as Attachment No. 2 to this staff report. PC staff Report— 1/24/12 HB-469- (12sror SEIR 07-00:Item 15. - 102 An analysis of the proposed project, including General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R), is presented in a companion report that may be considered by the Planning Commission after action on the SEIR. Background. The senior center project (EIR No. 07-002 and CUP No. 07-039) was initially approved by the City Council in 2008, but subsequent legal challenges invalidated the approvals necessitating a new approval process. Specifically, the Court ruled that the City violated its General Plan by failing to modify the General Plan to accommodate the senior center project in the Central Park Master Plan. The Court also determined that the City violated CEQA by failing to consider a reasonable range of alternatives, including closed school sites that became available after the Draft EIR was prepared but before the Final EIR was certified. The Court required the City to set aside the project approvals (EIR and CUP) and process a General Plan Amendment and conduct further environmental analysis. The Subsequent EIR includes analysis of the proposed General Plan Amendment and four additional alternative sites as well as additional analysis of potential impacts due to loss of open space Citywide as a result of utilizing all Quimby fees from the Pacific City project for the proposed senior center project. The 2007 EIR has also been updated where appropriate to reflect current existing conditions. Study Session: The Planning Commission held a study session on the SEIR and project on January 10, 2012. Staff presented an overview of the project's background and entitlements. After the staff presentation, Vice Chair Bixby asked several questions related to the project and SEIR. Some questions were responded to by staff at the Study Session while others are addressed in the following paragraph. Other non-CEQA related questions are addressed in the companion report for the CUP and GPA entitlements for the project. Vice Chair Bixby requested that the cumulative projects list in the SEIR be updated. However, the status of the cumulative projects in the SEIR is a snapshot of the status of each project at the time the analysis in the SEIR was prepared. Therefore, no changes to the cumulative projects list have been made. It should be noted that a log of pending projects can be obtained from the City website at the following link: http://www.huntingtonbeachc,a.gov/files/users/planning/AppLog_Janl2.pdf. This list is updated monthly and provides the most current information available for projects currently in process. Vice Chair Bixby also inquired as to why two additional project objectives were added to the SEIR. The two additional project objectives, related to emphasizing the safety and security of seniors and employees of the new facility and incorporating sustainable/ green building practices into the project design, were added because they became important components of the project during the design phase of the previously approved facility. In addition, emphasis on incorporation of green building practices in projects, particularly City initiated projects, is becoming an increasingly important priority Citywide and is encouraged through various City efforts, such as HB Goes Green program and the City's 10-Point Plan for Local Businesses. Vice Chair Bixby asked why there was no analysis of impacts to schools or libraries as a result of the senior center project. As discussed in the Initial Study/NOP for the project, the senior center does not include residential units and therefore, would not cause an increase in population creating substantial additional demand on schools and libraries. As such, no impact is anticipated and no further analysis was Item 15. - 103t— 1/24/12 HB -470- (12sr01 SEIR 07-002 Senior Center) included in the SEIR. Finally, Vice Chair Bixby inquired as to whether the Sports Complex was required to mitigate for loss of raptor foraging acreage at a one to one ratio and requested a copy of the map where the mitigation occurred to ensure that it is not the same location proposed for the senior center raptor foraging mitigation. The Sports Complex did not require mitigation for loss of raptor foraging area. The mitigation area for the senior center project is specified in Mitigation Measure 4.3-2, which identifies several options for location of the mitigation area. ISSUES: Subject Property And Surroundinz Land Use, Zoninz And General Plan Designations: LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING LAND USE. Subject Site: OS-P (Open Space— OS-PR(Open Space— Undeveloped, vacant Parks) Parks& Recreation) North of Subject Site OS-P OS-PR Undeveloped area; (across earthen berm) Shipley Nature center East of Subject Site: OS-P OS-PR Sports Complex; Central (across Goldenwest Library St.) South of Subject Site: OS-P OS-PR Disc golf course; equestrian center West of Subject Site: OS-P OS-PR Passive parkland The project site was developed with a farm house as early as the 1930s. Sometime in the 1960s, the house was demolished and the land was excavated so that dirt from the site could be used for construction of the 405 freeway. In 1974, the City acquired the land for Central Park and it has remained in its current undeveloped state. Although there are no developed structures or programmed uses of the site,the site is used informally for recreation and for traversing to get to other areas of the park. General Plan Conformance: The current General Plan Land Use Map designation on the subject site is OS-P (Open Space — Parks). The SEIR is consistent with the Open Space—Parks designation and the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan as follows: A. Air Quality Element Policy A 1.8.1: Continue to enforce construction site guidelines that require truck operators to minimize particulate emission. Policy AQ 1.8.2: Require installation of temporary construction facilities (such as wheel washers) and implementation of construction practices that minimize dirt and soil transfer onto public roadways. PC staff Report—1/24n2 HB -471- (12srot sEIRo7-oo:Item 15. - 104 Standard Code Requirements (CR) and Mitigation Measures NEW-4.2-2 (a) through (e) are identified in the SEIR to minimize air pollutant emission impacts, primarily by complying with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust, during construction of the project. B. Circulation Element Policy CE 2.3.1: Require development projects to mitigate off-site traffic impacts and pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular conflicts to the maximum extent feasible. Polite CE 2.3.2: Limit driveway access points and require adequate driveway widths onto arterial roadways and require driveways be located to ensure the smooth and efficient flow of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Policy CE 2.3.4: Require that new development mitigate its impact on City streets, including but not limited to,pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular conflicts, to maintain adequate levels of service. The SEIR includes a detailed traffic analysis to document potential impacts associated with the project. The SEIR concludes that the project would not result in deficiencies at any of the study intersections. In addition, the SEIR identifies code requirements to ensure on-site traffic signing and striping as well as adequate site distance at access points are implemented with development of the project to minimize pedestrian and vehicular conflicts. Policy CE 6.1.7: Require new development to provide accessible facilities to the elderly and disabled. AIM 4.12-4 requires that design features be incorporated into the project that take into account the special needs of seniors such as slower pedestrian walk speeds and larger roadway signs. C. Environmental Hazards Element Policy EH 1.2.1: Require appropriate engineering and building practices for all new structures to withstand groundshaking and liquefaction such as stated in the Uniform Building Code(UBC). Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 requires that detailed design measures identified in the Geotechnical Evaluation for the project be implemented, including those related to: earthwork, seismic design consideration, foundations, etc. Objective EH 3.2: Minimize methane hazards in the identified Methane Overlay District, and other areas outside the Methane Overlay Districts as may later be defined, through the regulation of construction and adherence to the City's Methane Hazard Mitigation Plan. MM 4.6-1(d) is required to address the potential hazards of the accumulation of methane and hydrogen sulfide gas at the project site by ensuring appropriate testing and methods of gas reduction, as required by the Huntington Beach Fire Department. Item 15. - 1051-114/12 HB -472- (12sr01 SEIR 07-002 Senior Center) D. Environmental Resources/Conservation Element Policy ERC 2.1.10: Conduct construction activities to minimize adverse impacts on existing wildlife resources. MM 4.3-1(a) and(b)will mitigate for the potential loss of wildlife habitat as a result of construction of the proposed project. In addition, MM 4.3-2 requires that five acres of parkland be conserved and/or enhanced for raptor foraging to mitigate the loss of five acres due to the proposed project. E. Historic and Cultural Resources Element Objective HCR 1.1: Ensure that all the City's historically and archaeologically significant resources are identified and protected. The SEIR documents all known archaeological sites in the vicinity of the project and recommends Mitigation Measures 4.4-1 (a) through (c) to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. These mitigation measures will ensure that, in the unlikely event that intact cultural materials are encountered during construction, these materials will be identified and scientifically removed and preserved, as appropriate. F. Noise Element Policy N 1.6.1: Ensure that construction activities be regulated to establish hours of operation, to prevent and/or mitigate the generation of excessive or adverse noise impacts through the implementation of the existing Noise Ordinance and/or any future revisions to the Noise Ordinance. The SEIR provides acoustical analysis to define noise levels on site. The analysis includes City code requirements and mitigation measures to ensure that noise levels in the exterior activity environments meet City standards, including limiting hours of construction that exceed the allowable hours specified in the Huntington Beach Municipal Code. G. Public Facilities and Services Element Objective PF 1.3: Ensure that new developments in Huntington Beach are designed to encourage safety. Policy PF 2.3.3: Ensure that new construction is designed with fire and emergency access and safety in mind. The SEIR documents that the proposed project does not impact safety or fire and emergency access. Zoning Compliance: Not applicable. Urban Design Guidelines Conformance: Not applicable. PC Staff Report—1/24/12 HB-473- (12srol SUR07-aa:Item 15. - 106 Environmental Status: CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requires a Subsequent EIR when changes to a project or its circumstances occur or if new information becomes available that would necessitate substantial revisions to the previously approved EIR. As detailed in the timeline below, a lawsuit challenged the City's approval of the project and adequacy of the EIR. The court ruling required the City to prepare a Subsequent EIR. DATE EVENT October, 2006 City entered into an agreement with the developer of Pacific City (a 30-acre mixed use development approved in the Downtown Specific Plan area)to construct a new senior center with fees assessed for parks/recreation pursuant to the Quimby Act and Chapter 254 of the HBZSO. November 7, 2006 Measure T was passed by Huntington Beach voters approving construction of a senior center on five acres in Huntington Central Park, following approval of all entitlements and environmental review. March--April, 2007 Staff conducted an initial study and determined that an EIR would be required. A Public Scoping Meeting was held to solicit comments and issue areas to be studied in the EIR. September—October, 2007 Draft EIR made available for public review and comment for forty-five days. A Public Comment Meeting was held to solicit comments on the adequacy of the Draft EIR. November 28, 2007 Final EIR (including Responses to Comments on Draft EIR, Text Changes to Draft EIR, Technical Appendix and Comments)made available for public information and sent to Responsible Agencies. December 11, 2007 Planning Commission held a public hearing and certified EIR No. 07-002 and approved CUP No. 07-039. February 4, 2008 City Council held a public hearing to consider appeal of the Planning Commission approvals and certified EIR No. 07-002 and approved CUP No. 07-039. March 4, 2008 Parks Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit against the City challenging the validity of the use of Quimby funds for the senior center, the approval of the CUP, the adequacy of the EIR and the Measure T vote. Item 15. - 107-t—1/24/12 HB -474- (12sr01 SE11Z 07-002 Senior Center) December 15, 2009 Superior Court ruled in favor of the Parks Legal Defense Fund on three causes of action ruling that the Petitioner's challenge of the Measure T vote was time-barred. The City subsequently filed an appeal of the ruling. December 13,2010 Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the City with respect to use of the Quimby fees and agreed with the trial court that the Measure T challenge was time-barred. However, the trial court ruling on the adequacy of the EIR and validity of the CUP approval were upheld. July 5, 2011 Pursuant to the court ruling, the City Council voted to set-aside the CUP and EIR approvals so that a Subsequent EIR could be prepared and a GPA and new CUP approved in accordance with the court's decision(Attachment No. 4). September 15—October 31, 2011 Draft SEIR made available for public review and comment for forty-five days. October 12, 2011 A public comment meeting was conducted to take comments from the public relative to the adequacy of the environmental analysis in the SEIR.. The Subsequent EIR includes analysis of the project's impacts as required by the court ruling and in accordance with CEQA. The new analysis includes the proposed General Plan Amendment and four additional alternative sites as well as additional analysis with respect to potential impacts due to loss of open space as a result of utilizing Quimby fees for the proposed senior center project. The Subsequent EIR also updates baseline conditions and includes a new greenhouse gas emissions section since it was not required in the 2007 EIR. During the Subsequent EIR process, a public comment meeting was held on October 12, 2011 during the 45-day public review period to collect comments on the adequacy of the draft Subsequent EIR. The meeting was advertised in the Huntington Beach Independent, and notices were sent to responsible agencies, interested parties and property owners and tenants within a 2000-foot radius of the project site. Approximately 25 people attended the comment meeting and raised issues and asked questions related to project funding and timing, the alternatives analysis, noise impacts, facility operations, and alternative sites selection. Comments from the meeting were recorded and responded to in the Final Subsequent EIR, which was made available on December 19,2011. Through the use of appropriate mitigation measures identified in the SEIR, all of the potentially adverse impacts associated with the project can be mitigated to a level of insignificance. There is, however, one significant cumulative environmental impact anticipated that cannot be completely eliminated through mitigation measures. The SEIR concludes that due to the increase in development intensity of the project site, when compared with current uses, the project contributes incrementally to the visual degradation of PC Staff Report- 7/24/12 1113 -475- (12srO1 SEIR 07-00:Item 15. - 108 the area in terms of reducing the amount of undeveloped open space in Central Park. This results in significant cumulative impacts to aesthetics. Prior to certification and adoption of the SEIR by resolution, the Planning Commission may amend the document. However, removal of any of the recommended mitigation measures requires findings and justification. The analysis section of this report contains further discussion regarding the conclusions of the SEIR. Environmental Board: The City's Environmental Board was provided an opportunity to comment on the SEIR during the 45-day public review period, but did not submit a comment letter. It should be noted that the Environmental Board submitted a comment letter on the previous EIR, which was responded to in the Response to Comments in accordance with CEQA Guidelines. Coastal Status: Not applicable Redevelopment Status: Not applicable. Design Review Board: Not applicable. Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Other Departments Concerns and Requirements: The SEIR was circulated to other Departments for review and comment. The analysis and conclusions included in Subsequent EIR No, 07-002 reflect and are based in part on consultation with the Building Division in addition to the Departments of Community Services, Economic Development, Fire, Police, Public Works and the City Attorney's Office. If approved, as development of the proposed project occurs, compliance with mitigation measures will be enforced through the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program by the responsible monitoring department. Public Notification: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Independent on January 12, 2012, and notices were sent to property owners of record and occupants within a 2,000 ft. radius of the subject property, individuals/organizations requesting notification (Planning Department's Notification Matrix), and other interested parties. As of January 17, 2012, no comments on the SEIR have been received. Application Processing Dates: DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S): a September 15, 2011 ® Within 1 year of complete application: September 15, 2012 Item 15. - 109,t_ 1/24/12 HB -476- (12sr01 SEIR07-002 Senior Center) ANALYSIS: The analysis section provides an overview of the SEIR and its conclusions, a review of the project alternatives and a summary of the response to comments. EIR Overview The SEIR provides a detailed analysis of potential impacts associated with the proposed project. It is intended to serve as an informational document for decisions to be made by the City and responsible agencies regarding the project. The issues discussed in the SEIR are those that have been identified in the course of extensive review of all potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the project. The direct, indirect and cumulative impacts of the project are addressed, as are the impacts of project alternatives, A summary of ley issues and mitigation measures as a result of the subsequent environmental impact report process is provided below. A complete listing of the recommended mitigation measures is provided in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program provided as Attachment No. 3. Scone of Subsequent EIR Analysis The Subsequent EIR includes analysis of the proposed General Plan Amendment and four additional alternative sites as well as additional analysis with respect to potential impacts due to loss of open space as a result of utilizing Quimby fees for the proposed senior center project. The SEIR also updates baseline conditions and includes a new greenhouse gas emissions section since it was not required in the 2007 EIR. Subsequent EIR No. 07-002 analyzed 14 impact areas listed below. X Air Quality ■ Aesthetics i Biological Resources ■ Cultural Resources Geology and Soils ■ Hazards and hazardous Materials Greenhouse Gas Emissions i Land Use and Planning ■ Hydrology and Water Quality a Noise Recreation i Public Services It Traffic 0 Utilities & Service Systems Although each impact area was updated from the 2007 EIR as necessary, several impact areas and sections required more extensive revisions to address the issues raised in the court ruling. The most substantial changes from the previous (2007)EIR to the Subsequent EIR were in the following areas: ■ Project Description: added General Plant Amendment description, update of project objectives, discussion on court ruling, description of four new alternative sites (described in more detail below) ■ Land Use and Planning: General Plan Amendment analysis ■ Recreation: analysis of Citywide impacts to parkland due to use of Quimby fees from the Pacific City project for the senior center project and not acquisition of parkland PC Staff Report— 1/24/12 HB -477- (12sro1 s>11R 07-00:Item 15. - 110 • Alternatives: analysis of four new alternative sites • Greenhouse Gas Emissions: new analysis not included in 2007 EIR No impacts in the areas of Agricultural Resources, Mineral Resources and Population and Housing were determined during the scoping process for the 2007 EIR. None of the changes in the project description, alternative sites, or baseline conditions would result in a change to this determination; as such, no analysis is provided in the Subsequent EIR in these impact areas. Similar to the 2007 EIR, all project impacts would result in less than significant impacts or less than significant impacts with implementation of code requirements and mitigation measures. The Subsequent EIR determined one significant and unavoidable cumulative impact would occur in the area of aesthetics as a result of the project. This significant and unavoidable cumulative aesthetic impact was also identified in the 2007 EIR. ♦ Aesthetics Implementation of the project -Mll alter views of the area and introduce new sources of light and glare. The SEIR analyzes the potential impacts associated with these changes, including an analysis of impacts to and from the existing parkland west of the project site. The SEIR concludes that impacts associated with light and glare could be potentially significant and recommends Mitigation Measure (NA4) 4.1-3 (a — e), which reduces impacts associated with onsite lighting and restricts the use of reflective materials on fagade treatments. The SEIR documents that potential impacts related to scenic resources and views will be less than significant and do not warrant mitigation. However, the project contributes to the overall loss of undeveloped open space and the cumulative impact is considered significant from an aesthetic viewpoint. ♦ Air Quality Air quality modeling was completed to assess potential impacts related to construction and operation of the project. Consistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) recommendations, the SEIR analyzed the folloMng emissions: Carbon Monoxide (CO), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Nitrogen Oxides (NO,), Sulfur Oxides (SO,;) and pine Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10) and (PM2_5). In addition, the SEIR examined if localized CO concentrations at nearby intersections would be increased beyond state and national standards as a result of increased vehicle traffic. The SEIR concludes that the project results in less than significant impacts for all emissions and would not expose sensitive receptors (surrounding residents and park users) to substantial pollutant concentrations. The project must comply with standard requirements such as SCAQMD's Rule 403 related to fugitive dust during construction. The SEIR discusses six standard City code requirements to improve air quality emissions and recommends five mitigation measures to farther reduce air quality impacts during construction. o Biological Resources Item 15. - 111 t— 1124/12 HB -478- (12sr01 SEIR 07-002 Senior Center) In 2007, Atkins (then PBS&J) conducted a general botanical survey and a focused blooming season survey in addition to a general wildlife survey at the project site for the EIR. A nesting habitat survey was conducted in 2008 and a burrowing owl survey was conducted in 2009 in accordance with the mitigation measures of the 2007 EIR In preparation of the SEIR, a site visit was conducted by Atkins in 2011 to assess existing site conditions and record any substantial changes to the site. Atkins staff determined that substantial changes to the site have not occurred since preparation of the 2007 EIR. A total of 12 plant species and 14 wildlife species were recorded within the project site during the surveys. Other sensitive plant and wildlife species have the potential to occur on the project site. Through incorporation of MM 4.3-1 (a) and (b) impacts to the burrowing owl, a sensitive wildlife species with moderate potential to occur on the site, and protected or sensitive avian species can be mitigated to less than significant levels. These mitigation measures require focused surveys and avoidance measures prior to any ground disturbance activities. To mitigate the loss of five acres of raptor foraging habitat as a result of project implementation, MM 4.3-2 requires that five acres of suitable area be conserved and/or enhanced for raptor foraging. ♦ Cultural Resources The northern half of the project site lies within the recorded southern portion of prehistoric site CA-ORA- 142. As such, a records search, Native American consultation, pedestrian survey of the site and subsequent test trenching was performed to assess the presence of cultural resources within the project site. The records search confirmed destruction of the site and test trench excavations were negative for evidence of CA-ORA-142. Nonetheless, it is possible that intact portions of CA-ORA-142 remain outside the project site but in the vicinity. The SEIR recommends MM 4.4-1 (a—c)which would reduce impacts to archaeological resources to less than significant levels by requiring monitoring of construction activities by a qualified professional archaeologist and requiring the scientific recovery and evaluation of any resources that are encountered during construction. ♦ Geology and Soils The SEIR includes an analysis of existing geology, seismicity and soil conditions that would be conducive to geological constraints such as liquefaction or expansive soils. The analysis is based on the preliminary geotechnical study completed for the project, which determined that the project is feasible from a geotechnical perspective. The SEIR concludes that implementation of the project will require MM 4.5-1 to minimize potential impacts to less than significant levels. MM 4.5-1 requires that detailed design measures contained within the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the project be implemented, including those related to: earthwork, seismic design consideration, foundations, etc. MM 4.5-2 requires that the near surface soils of the northern slope, or earthen berm, adjacent to the project site,be compacted and covered with an appropriate erosion protection device to reduce the likelihood of impacts from landslides. The SEIR also identifies requirements for compliance with the National Pollutant Elimination Discharge System (NPDES) permit process, California Building Code (CBC) and the City's Grading and Excavation Code that would ensure erosion and other soil instability impacts resulting from project construction would be less than significant. PC Staff Report— 1/24/12 HB -479- (]2sr01 SEIR 07-(1,)Item 15. - 112 m Greenhouse Gas (GHG)Emissions The SEIR includes a new section that analyzes impacts from GHG emissions. Construction activities and equipment as well as operation of the facility all contribute to the generation of GHG emissions. GHG emissions were calculated using CalEEMod software, which concluded that estimated annual GHG emissions would be below the draft emissions threshold established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), and thus, less than significant. The SEIR also concluded that the project would not conflict with applicable plans and policies for reducing GHG emissions such as The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32). o Hazards and Hazardous Materials The SEIR analyzes the potential for impacts associated with hazardous materials on existing uses, construction workers and proposed uses. The proposed project, as a senior recreation facility, will not result in the increased likelihood of hazardous materials incidents. Implementation of the proposed project does not pose any constraints to the city's existing Emergency Management Plan. Mitigation measures are proposed to reduce all potentially significant effects associated with the potential exposure of unknown hazardous materials through construction activities to less than significant levels by ensuring remediation of contaminated soils containing hazardous materials prior to development and by providing supplemental procedures in the event of unanticipated discoveries of contaminants. 4 Hydrology and Water Quality The SEIR concludes that impacts to hydrology and water quality are potentially significant but can be mitigated to less than significant levels through MM 4.7-1, which requires a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project and shall include specific stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) for reducing potential pollutants in stormwater runoff. In addition, MM 4.7-2 reduces impacts to erosion and flooding by requiring a Hydrology and Hydraulic Report and Drainage Plan that incorporates stormwater conveyance facilities to provide adequate site drainage and minimize erosive forces. a Land Use and Planning The project site has a General Plan Land Use designation of Open Space -- Park (OS-P) and a zoning designation of Open Space — Park and Recreation (OS-PR). The Central Park Master Plan of Uses currently designates the 5-acre senior center site as a low intensity recreation area. Implementation of the proposed project requires a General Plan Amendment to update the Central Park Master Plan to accommodate the higher intensity senior center development and incorporate the Central Park Master Plan into the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan. A Conditional Use Permit is required to allow development of a senior recreation facility on the site. The development and its conformance to the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance are analyzed in the companion report for this project. Although the project requires a General Plan Amendment to accommodate a higher intensity recreational use and identify the senior center site on the Central Park Master Plan, the project is Item 15. - 1131- 1/24/12 HB -480- (12sr01 SEIR 07-002 Senior Center) consistent with the General Planning land use designation of OS —P and zoning designation of OS -- PR. Both designations allow for public recreation facilities. Additionally, the change from a low intensity recreation area to a high intensity recreation area to accommodate the proposed development would not substantially reduce the overall amount of remaining passive recreational space in Central Park such that the project would conflict with applicable policies of the General Plan. The SEIR concludes that the proposed project is compatible with existing adjacent developments directly across Goldenwest Street, specifically the Sports Complex and Central Library. Overall, impacts to land use are considered less than significant and no mitigation is required. Noise Potential noise impacts relate to short-term construction activities and long-term changes in ambient conditions related to an increase in traffic. Ambient noise levels were measured in 2007 and again in 2011 to confirm that substantial changes in existing noise levels had not occurred. Noise levels were measured at five locations around the project site and roadway noise levels were calculated using data from the traffic study. In terms of the short-term noise impacts from construction, the City's noise ordinance exempts noise associated with construction provided the construction takes place between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. Monday through Saturday. Despite this exemption, to further reduce less-than-significant impacts the SEIR recommends MM 4.9-1(a)to limit the hours and days during which grading and construction can occur to between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. Monday through Friday and 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Saturdays. The SEIR also indicates that noise associated with operation of the senior center, including amplified noise from special events, will be required to comply with the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance and impacts are considered less than significant. Public Services Potential impacts to fire, police, schools and libraries are analyzed in the SEIR. The proposed project will not result in a substantial demand for services such that new public services or facilities are needed and therefore, all impacts to public services are considered less than significant. ® Recreation The SEIR indicates that construction and operation of the proposed senior center would increase the overall level of recreational opportunities in the City. Because development of the project site represents the loss of only 1.5 percent of all passive parkland in Central Park, impacts to existing passive recreational opportunities are less than significant. The SEIR discloses that the City currently meets the "parkland to population" ratio of 5 acres per 1,000 persons established by the General Plan and is not deficient in parkland. The proposed project does not contribute to an additional residential population such that a reduction in the City's current parkland ratio of 5.25 acres per 1,000 residents would occur. To this end, the proposed senior center project does not result in a significant impact to park opportunities Citywide, and no mitigation resulting from a deficiency in parkland would be required. Consequently, use of Quimby funds from a downtown project (the 30-acre Pacific City project) for development of the senior center project rather than land acquisition or other park improvement projects becomes a policy decision and not an environmental matter. PC Staff Report--1/24/12 HB -481- (12sr01 SEIR 07-00:Item 15. - 114 One mitigation measure has been incorporated to require that construction signs be posted in Central Park near the project site at least thirty days prior to construction commencement to give notice to informal users of the site. The mitigation measure also requires that the temporary disc golf hole that is currently on the site be permanently relocated prior to any construction activities. 0 Transportation/Traffic The SEIR examines the potential impacts related to traffic generation, parking demand and access. The analysis takes into consideration the access improvements that will be constructed with the project and the special issues that arise with senior drivers. A project specific traffic study was completed in 2007 during preparation of the previously certified EIR. Since that time, the City's Transportation Division has confirmed that traffic conditions in the l6cinity of the project site have not substantially changed such that new traffic counts were warranted for the SEIR. However, the SEIR does include an analysis of Existing Plus Project conditions to ensure that the proper baseline was utilized for assessing traffic impacts as well as an analysis of traffic conditions in Year 2012 (near-term conditions) and Year 2030 to assess potential impacts at project buildout and the long-term effect of the project in conjunction with other growth within the City. The SEIR indicates that the proposed project would not cause a change in the level of service resulting in deficient operation of any of the study intersections nor contribute to deficient traffic operations for those intersections projected to be deficient under Without Project conditions. Roadway hazards can be reduced through mitigation measures and code requirements that also consider the specific attributes of seniors using the facility. ® Utilities and Service Systems This section of the SEIR analyzes potential impacts to water, wastewater, solid waste services and electricity and natural gas utilities. The SEIR concludes that implementation of the project could increase the demand for electricity resulting in potentially significant impacts. MM 4.13-3 requires that additional electrical load analyses be undertaken to determine the need for additional electrical transformers. The EIR also concludes that implementation of new stormwater treatment control BMPs could result in potentially significant impacts. CR 4.13-1(a) and CR 4.13-2(b) require that the project prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and that all BMPs described in the Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) are properly installed and implemented. With implementation of the proposed mitigation measures and City code requirements, impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels. Alternatives to the Proposed Project CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 requires a reasonable range of alternatives to be evaluated that would attain most of the project objectives while avoiding or substantially reducing any of the significant environmental impacts caused by the project. The City selected potential project alternatives based on the CEQA Guidelines and the language of the court ruling. Seven alternatives were evaluated in the Item 15. - 1 15 t—1/24/12 HB -482- (12sr01 SEIR 07-002 Senior Center) Subsequent FIR. The seven alternatives included the three alternatives analyzed in the 2007 EIR as described below: ■ No Project/Continuation of Uses Allowed By Existing General Plan and Master Plan — Analyzes development on the site as a "low intensity recreation area' with the access driveway, parking lot, restrooms, tot lot and open space. ■ Reduced Project/Alternative Configuration — Analyzes a reduction in the size of the development with a 30,000 square foot building re-oriented to the southeast corner of the site. ■ Alternative Central Park Site—Analyzes the alternative site location of the northwest corner of Ellis Avenue and Goldenwest Street. Additionally, in response to the court ruling, four additional alternatives were selected for evaluation in the Subsequent EIR including: ■ Kettler School Site—Analyzes use of an existing 38,418 square foot school building at the closed Kettler School site located at 8750 Dorsett Drive, west of Magnolia Street between Atlanta and Hamilton Avenues. This site is specifically referenced in the court ruling. ■ Park View School Site — Analyzes use of 45,000 square feet of an existing 56,837 square foot school building at the closed Park View School site located at 16666 Tunstall Lane, east of Goldenwest Street between Heil Avenue and the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Flood Control Channel. This site was included because it is a closed school site that is currently available for use with a centrally located building large enough to accommodate the proposed senior center. ■ Magnolia Tank Farm Site — Analyzes demolition of the existing empty oil storage tanks and ancillary site improvements and construction of a 45,000 square foot senior center on a portion of the existing 27-acre former Magnolia Oil Tank Farm located on the west side of Magnolia Street at Banning Avenue. At the time the City was evaluating other sites, this site's property owner was pursuing a Coastal Development Permit to remove the tanks. In addition, the site already has proper General Plan and zoning land use designations for the proposed senior center. ■ The Cove Site— Analyzes construction of a 45,000 square foot senior center on a portion of the 9.9-acre undeveloped site located at the northeast corner of Gothard Street and Garfield Avenue. This site was included because the property owner, Chevron Land and Development Co., contacted the City to discuss a potential land swap for the current senior center site, which was deeded to the City by Chevron (then Standard Oil Corp.). The site was also chosen due to its central location in the City and undeveloped status. Other alternatives such as upgrading the existing Rodgers Senior Center, using vacant commercial buildings, other closed school sites, and multiple small satellite senior centers were considered but rejected as infeasible. The Alternatives analysis concluded that Alternative 3: Alternative Central Park site would be considered the environmentally superior alternative. Statement of Overridinjz Considerations Environmental impacts associated with implementation of a project may not always be mitigated to a level considered less than significant. In such cases, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be prepared prior to approval of the project, and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and PC Staff Report-1/24/12 HB -483- (12sr01 SEIR 07-00 Item 15. - 116 15093. Although the project would not result in significant project-specific impacts, implementation of the proposed project could result in significant cumulative impacts to aesthetics. Therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) is required to describe the specific reasons for approving the project, based on information contained within the Final SEIR, as well as any other information in the public record. The SOC is part of the companion report for this project, which analyzes General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R). Public Comments on the Draft SEIR During the public review period, the City of Huntington Beach received a total of 12 comment letters from one state agency, one organization and nine individuals (one individual submitted two comment letters), as well as 13 verbal comments at the public meeting held during the 45-day comment period. Staff has responded to all comments received in the Response to Comments of the Final SEIR. The Final SEIR includes revised text sections as a result of the comments or as a result of staff requests to clarify information. Any written communication received subsequent to the preparation of this staff report will be forwarded to the Planning Commission under separate cover. SUMMARY: Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002 serves as an informational document with the sole purpose of identifying potential environmental impacts associated with the Huntington Beach Senior Center project, alternatives that minimize those impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission certify SEIR No. 07-002 because: ■ The SEIR has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act; ■ The SEIR responds to the court ruling and addresses all specific environmental issues raised by the court with respect to loss of parkland Citywide, project alternatives and the proposed General Plan Amendment; ■ The SEIR adequately addresses the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project, and ■ The EIR identifies project alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen the project's impacts consistent with General Plan policies. ATTACHMENTS: 2, ineludesElio� j J Me Ge,.tr6d Libr-ary and o Me City „1,.,,t„1 tjof To vSetting (CUP 0:7 03o .,a -_rn n7 nnm) A4 Item 15. - 117rt- 1/24/12 HB -484- (12sr01 SEIR 07-002 Senior Center) J� City OtHuntingt©n Beach Pla nine and wilding Department STAFF FORS FIUNTINCFQN BEACH - TO: Planning Commission FROM: Scott Hess,AICP, Director of Planning and Building BY: Jennifer Villasenor, Senior Planner DATE: January 24, 2012 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLANT AMENDMENT NO. 11-004/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.07-039(R) (HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER) APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: City of Huntington Beach, 2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach, CA 92648 LOCATION: 18041 Goldenwest Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (5-acre site southwest of the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue) STATEMENT OF ISSUE: a General Plan Amendment (GPA)No. 11-004 involves incorporating the Central Park Master Plan into the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan and updating the Central Park Master Plan. of Uses to change the 5-acre senior center site from a low intensity to a high intensity recreation area and accommodate the senior center development. Conditional Use Permit(CUP)No. 07-039(R) is a request to construct and operate up to a 45,000 square foot one-story senior recreation facility on a site with a grade difference greater than 3 feet. ® Staff Recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R)based upon the following: - General Plan goals, objectives, and policies encourage the establishment of uses that support the needs of existing and fixture Huntington Beach residents when compatible with and sensitive to adjacent uses. - Provides a centrally located senior and human service recreation facility in the City of Huntington Beach. - Provides for a new senior center large enough to meet the current and future demand of an increasing senior population. - Enhances the community image of the City of Huntington Beach through the design and construction of a high quality development. - Complies with applicable zoning regulations of the OS-PR zoning designation. - Emphasizes and incorporates sustainable building practices and provides a project consistent with recognized green building programs. - Minimizes adverse environmental effects to the extent feasible. - Responds to and complies with the ruling of the California Court of Appeals (Attachment No. 7) based on a lawsuit that challenged the City's CEQA compliance and previous project approvals. HB -485- Item 15. - 118 RECOIMIENDATION: Motion to: A. "Approve General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 by approving the draft City Council Resolution No. (Attachment No. 1) and fonvard to the City Council for adoption;" B. "Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R) with findings and suggested conditions of approval (Attachment No. 2)." C. "Approve CEQA Statement of Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attachment No. 3)." ALTERNATIVE ACTION(S): The Planning Commission may take alternative actions such as: A. "Continue General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit 07-039R and direct staff accordingly." B. "Deny General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit 07-039R with findings for denial." Dr cf.fruo„^-t—I/24/12 2 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Senior Center) Item 15. - 119 HB -486- e s t � f s,. n . ' ",r'Fui-", +✓� F.3, 'i^iT A HADIQDIV Me FAD as F*K- WARNER SLATER TALBERT Tim I I Aukum XqUANAYOW ATLANTA VICINITY MAP SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 07-002/ GENERAL FLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-004/CGNDTTI®NAL USE PERMIT NO. 07-039(R) (SENIOR CENTER IN H-,7 —' -,.TON CENTRAL PARK) - 120 its -487- Item 15. PROJECT PROPOSAL: General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 11-004 involves incorporating the Central Park Master Plan into the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan and updating the Central Park Master Plan of Uses to change the 5-acre senior center site from a low intensity to a high intensity recreation area and accommodate the senior center development (Attachment No. 1). The General Plan Amendment is proposed in response to a court ruling from a lawsuit filed challenging the adequacy of the City's CEQA review and project approval (Attachment No. 7). The General Plan Amendment would ensure that the proposed senior center project is consistent with the Central Park Master Plan and General Plan Recreation and Community Services Element. The court ruling and General Plan Amendment are discussed further in the background section of this report. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 07-039(R) represents a request to construct and operate up to a 45,000 square foot senior recreation facility on a 5-acre site in Central Park pursuant to Chapter 213.06 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance (HBZSO). The conditional use permit is also necessary because the project is located on a site with a grade differential greater than three feet and includes a gated entrance to the site. No change to the previously approved CUP request is proposed. The 5-acre project site is located within the 343-acre Huntington Central Park and generally located southwest of the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue, between the disc golf course, which is at a higher elevation, and the Shipley Nature Center. The 5-acre project site will comprise the senior center building, parking lot and open space area (Attachment No. 4), The approximately 45,000 square foot building consists of a community hall/dining room, group exercise, fitness and dance rooms, multi-use classrooms, a kitchen, a social lounge and administrative offices. The outdoor open area includes a patio with a decorative trellis, an expansive lawn, a garden, a fountain, benches and a natural meadow. The parking area would include a minimum of 227 parking spaces including spaces for shuttles and City vehicles. Landscaping is provided throughout the site and consists of a mix of California native and non-native drought tolerant vegetation. Ingress and egress to and from the site is proposed via a planned access driveway with entry gate at the existing Goldenwest Street/Talbert Avenue intersection. An existing traffic signal at this location will be modified for traffic to enter and exit the project site. ProzrammOm&Hours of Operation The proposed senior center will operate much like the existing Rodgers Senior Center operates today. The new center will be used for a variety of recreational programs and activities serving the City's seniors, although the facility will be accessible to all residents of the City. Primary uses include: recreation and social services, Senior Outreach Program (transportation, meals, counseling/visitation), and public meetings or receptions when not occupied by primary functions. PC Rtaff Rennrt—1/24/12 4 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Senior Center) Item 15. - 121 1413 -488- Proposed hours of operation are: Pay Proposed Regular Hours of Classes&Activities operation Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m.—4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. — 10:00 p.m. Saturday&Sunday None 8:00 a.m. — 10:00 p.m. Special Events in Multi-Purpose Room{w/reservations) Sunday through Thursday Until 10:00 p.m. Friday& Saturday Until 12:00 a.m. With reservations, special events such as wedding receptions or public meetings are proposed to be held in the community hall when it is not being used for recreation or social programs. The current senior center also allows reservations for special events and currently rents the center to a church on Sundays. Backkround: The senior center project (EIR No. 07-002 and CUP No. 07-039) was initially approved by the City Council in 2008, but subsequent legal challenges invalidated the approvals necessitating a new approval process. Specifically, the Court ruled that the City violated its General Plan by failing to modify the General Plan to accommodate the senior center project in the Central Park Master Plan. The Court also determined that the City violated CEQA by failing to consider a reasonable range of alternatives, including closed school sites that became available after the Draft EIR was prepared but before the Final EIR was certified. The Court required the City to set aside the project approvals (EIR and C-UP) and process a General Plan Amendment and conduct further environmental analysis. In July 2011, the City Council voted to set-aside the previous approvals and directed staff to prepare a Subsequent EIR and process the General Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit entitlements. Central Park Master Plan The Central Park Master Plan was adopted by the City Council in December 1997. Originally proposed as a Specific Plan, but later changed to a Master Plan, the Central Park Master Plan identified existing developed park uses as well as a proposed Sports Complex and several concepts for long-term development of the remaining undeveloped areas of Central Park. In 1999, the Central Park Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) was certified by the City Council. The MEM analyzed program- level and project-level elements of approximately 157 acres of undeveloped and developed areas of Central Park. The senior center site was analyzed at a program-level as part of a larger 16-acre area (current calculations have since refined this area. to 14 acres) designated for low-intensity recreation uses envisioned to be developed with a tot lot, turf, a picnic shelter, restrooms, barbecue area and parking. However, none of these elements were implemented. The proposed General Plan Amendment would amend the current Central Park Master Plan as adopted by the City Council to accommodate the senior center development. The revised Central Park Master Plan (Attachment No. 1) also identifies the proposed permanent location of the Therapeutic Riding Center, which requires approval by the Community Services Commission and City Council. No other changes to the Central Park Master Plan are proposed. PC Staff Report—1/24/12 5 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Senior Center) HB -489- Item 15. - 122 Study Session: The Planning Commission held a study session on the project on January 10, 2012. Most of the Planning Commission questions from the study session are addressed in the Staff Report for SEIR No. 07-002. There were two members of the public that spoke in support of the project. One member of the public provided a packet of information for the Planning Commission, which was provided under separate cover and made part of the project file. In addition, Vice Chair Bixby requested more detail regarding the aspects of the lawsuit for which the City prevailed. However, those items from the lawsuit that the court did not direct the City to address are not germane to the project and do not require further detail in the staff report. Vice Chair Bixby also requested a copy of the trial court decision as well as a copy of the CEQA guidelines related to evaluation of project alternatives. Those items were previously provided to the Planning Commission under separate cover. ISSUES: Subiect Property And Surrounding Land Use,Zoning And General Plan Designations: LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING. LAND:USE; Subject Site: OS-P (Open Space— OS-PR(Open Space— Undeveloped,vacant Parks) Parks &Recreation North of Subject Site OS-P OS-PR Undeveloped area; (across earthen berm) Shi le Nature center East of Subject Site: OS-P OS-PR Sports Complex; Central (across Goldenwest Library St.) South of Subject Site: OS-P OS-PR Disc golf course; equestrian center West of Subject Site: I OS-P OS-PR Passive parkland The project site was developed with a farm house as early as the 1930s. Sometime in the 1960s, the house was demolished and the land was excavated so that dirt from the site could be used for construction of the 405 freeway. In 1974, the City acquired the land for Central Park and it has remained in its current undeveloped state. Although there are no developed structures or programmed uses of the site, the site is used informally for recreation and for traversing to get to other areas of the park. General Plan Conformance.- The current General Plan Land Use Map designation on the subject site is OS-P(Open Space—Parks). The proposed project is consistent with the Open Space Parks designation and the goals and policies of the City's General Plan as follows: yr c*.ffRA,, 1— 1/24/12 6 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Senior Center) Item 15. - 123 HB -490- A. Air Quality Element Policy AO 1.8.3: Encourage developers to maintain the natural topography, to the maximum extent possible, and limit the amount of land clearing, blasting, grading, and ground excavation operations needed for development. The proposed project anticipates a balanced site with minor cut and fill operations during construction. Policy AQ 1.10.1: Continue to require the utilization and installation of energy conservation features in all new construction. As with all new buildings, the proposed project will be required to comply with the energy conservation standards of Title 24, which would ensure that there would be no wasteful or unnecessary use of energy. In addition, the project is pursuing sustainable design elements similar to those utilized in the development of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) buildings. B. Circulation Element Goal CE 2: Provide a circulation system which supports existing, approved and planned land uses throughout the City while maintaining a desired level of service on all streets and at all intersections. Obrective CE 3.2: Encourage new development that promotes and expands the use of transit services. Policy CE 6.1.6: Maintain existing pedestrian facilities and require new development to provide pedestrian walkways and bicycle routes between developments, schools, and public facilities. Policy CE 6.1.7.• Require new development to provide accessible facilities to the elderly and disabled. Policy CE 7.1.7: Continue to construct landscaped medians in existing major and primary arterial streets and continue to require the construction of landscaped medians in new developments. The proposed senior center project will be required to comply with the requirements of the ADA. The proposed project will also provide ADA access to the site via a pedestrian path north of the access driveway. The project includes parking spaces and a drop-off area for shuttle vehicles to provide senior transit services to and from the facility. The proposed project includes construction of a planned access driveway at the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue. The new access driveway includes modifying the existing traffic signal at the intersection and a proposed landscaped median. Finally, the proposed project would not contribute to a reduction in the level of service of surrounding streets and intersections resulting in a deficient circulation system. C. Environmental Hazards Element Policy EH 4.1.1: During major redevelopment or initial construction, require specific measures to be taken by developers, builders, or property owners in flood prone areas, to prevent or reduce damage from flood hazards and the risks upon human safety. PC Staff Report—1/24/12 7 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Senior Center) HB -491- Item 15. - 124 Although the site is partially located in Flood Zone A, the project site is already a minimum of 4 feet higher than the base flood elevation at its lowest point. A flood elevation certificate will be required for the proposed project. D. Growth Management Element Goal GM 2: Ensure that adequate transportation and public facilities and public services are provided for existing and future residents of the City. The proposed project would provide a public facility to serve the expanding senior population in the City and be large enough to accommodate future demand. The proposed project does not result in any significant traffic impacts and adequate public facilities and services are available to serve the development. E. Hazardous Materials Element Policy HM 1.2.3: Support land use or developments adjacent to or within close proximity of sensitive uses, which do not utilize, store, handle, or contain hazardous materials and/or waste, and which would create an unsafe, unhealthy, or hazardous condition for adjacent uses. Construction and operation of the proposed senior center would not include the use of large quantities of hazardous materials, and any commonly used hazardous materials would be used and stored in accordance with applicable regulations. Implementation of the proposed project would not create an unsafe or hazardous condition for adjacent uses. F. Land Use Element Policy L U 4.2.1: Require that all structures be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the City's building and other pertinent codes and regulations; including new, adaptively re-used, and renovated buildings. Policy LU 4.2.4: Require that all development be designed to provide adequate space for access, parking, supporting functions, open space and other pertinent elements. Policy LU 4.2.5: Require that all commercial, industrial and public development incorporate appropriate design elements to facilitate access and use as required by State and Federal Laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The proposed project will be constructed in accordance with existing laws and regulations, including the California Building Code, the Huntington Beach Municipal Code and any applicable State and federal law requirements such as ADA. In addition, the project is proposed to be in conformance with the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and is not seeking any variances to deviate from the code requirements. Adequate access to and from the project site will be provided through the entrance at the Goldenwest Street/Talbert Avenue intersection. Sufficient parking will be provided on site for the senior center use and a recommended condition of approval would ensure that ADA PC ctnff Rannrt_1/24/12 8 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Senior Center) Item 15. - 125 HB -492- parking spaces would exceed the minimum required. The site also maximizes open space through the provision of outdoor amenities such as a patio, a garden and a fountain courtyard area with over an acre of landscaped area. G. Recreation and Communit •Services Element Policy RCS .1,1.1: Provide leisure opportunities through programs and activities that serve the general population as well as the specialized needs of the disabled, children and elderly. Policy RCS 2.1.1: Maintain the current park per capita ratio of 5.0 acres per 1,000 persons, which includes the beach in the calculation. Policy RCS 3.1.2: Provide a variety of amenities within recreation areas in order to accommodate persons with different interests. Policy RCS 3.1.7: Design recreational facilities to the accessibility requirements as specified in State and Federal laws such as the Americana with Disabilities Act(ADA) standards for accessibility. The proposed project is a senior recreation facility proposed to be developed in accordance with ADA standards. In addition, the project would provide accessible parking spaces exceeding ADA requirements. The senior center and associated -amenities will provide the City with expanded recreational resources for a diverse senior population large enough to meet existing and future demand. The senior center will be accessible to all residents of the City of Huntington Beach and provide a needed community facility for the entire City. Although the proposed General Plan Amendment would re-designate the project site from a low intensity recreation area to a high intensity recreation area on the Central Park Master Plan,the project site would not result in a reduction in City parkland and the City's established "park per capita" ratio would be maintained in accordance with Policy RCS 2.1.1. H. Urban Design Element Goal UD 1: Enhance the visual image of the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed project features an architectural design that will blend, to the extent possible, with the park setting of the surrounding area. Materials include an abundance of wood,glass, stone and stucco. The design also incorporates a variety of forms, wall planes, roof lines, offsets, exterior finish materials and decorative architectural elements such as a wood trellis patio and an outdoor fountain courtyard area. The proposed landscaping includes meadow grasses and native and non-native drought tolerant plants that are compatible with the landscaped areas of the passive park west of the project site, Shipley Nature Center to the north, and the Sports Complex to the east across Goldenwest Street. PC Staff Report—1124/12 9 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Senior Center) HB -493- Item 15. - 126 I. Utilities Element Objective U 1.2: Ensure that existing and new development does not degrade the City's surface waters and groundwater basins. Objective U 1.3: Minimize water consumption rates through site design, use of efficient systems, and other techniques. Policy U 1.3.2: Continue to require the incorporation of water conservation features in the design of all new and existing uses such as the use of native plants, low flow toilets and water efficient appliances. Policy U 3.3.2: Where feasible, utilize natural overland flows, open channels, and swale routings as preferred alignments for components of drainage systems. Policy U 3.3.3: Require that new developments employ the most efficient drainage technology to control drainage and minimize damage to environmental sensitive areas. The proposed project includes bioswales and vegetated buffer areas to treat runoff from the proposed project's impervious areas. Implementation of BMPs and the project's directing of stormwater flows through the park and Huntington Lake will ensure that project implementation would not adversely impact sensitive environments such as the Shipley Nature Center. Additionally, the project would comply with the City's Municipal Code to reduce water consumption and stormwater runoff. A final Water Quality Management Plan is required to be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Public Works prior to grading permit issuance. Finally, the project will incorporate sustainable site development strategies and utilize water savings features to ensure compliance with City policies to maximize water conservation efforts. Zoning Compliance: The project site is located in the OS-PR (Open Space — Parks & Recreation) zone and complies with the requirements of that zone. The OS-PR zone permits park and recreation facilities with approval of a conditional use permit. The project site is a 5-acre site situated within a 54-acre parcel in Central Park. The proposed project exceeds all minimum standards for lot area, lot width, setbacks and site coverage. The building will be setback approximately 300 feet from Goldenwest Street and is approximately 30 feet in height with architectural projections reaching up to 46 feet in height. The maximum height permitted in the OS-PR zone is 45 feet. However, HBZSO Section 230.72 — Exceptions to Height Limits, allows architectural features to exceed the maximum height limit permitted in the base zoning district by no more than 10 feet. The proposed project complies with this provision of the code. Pa._.._..Y_ki The HBZSO does not specify a parking ratio for a park and recreation facility. Rather, the parking ratio is determined to be specific to the requested use. In this case, staff relied on consultation with LPA, Inc., a consulting firm that was commissioned to prepare a feasibility study for a new senior center prior to the Measure T election in November 2006. Based on LPA's experience in designing and constructing community buildings such as the proposed senior center, a recommendation of four to five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area was suggested. In addition, staff surveyed other senior centers and At' Cuff v--rt_1/24/12 10 (12srO2 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Senior Center) Item 15. - 127 1413 -494- found that parking ratios for those centers ranged from one parking space per 100 square feet to one parking space per 300 square feet. It should be noted that the majority of the senior centers surveyed also indicated that parking was sufficient. The proposed senior center project would provide a minimum of 227 parking spaces at a ratio of just over five parking spaces per 1,000 square feet (one per 198 square feet). This is consistent with both the LPA recommendation and the senior centers that were surveyed. The number of ADA parking spaces required is seven. However, because the proposed senior center may have a higher ratio of disabled drivers, staff is recommending that the number of ADA parking spaces be increased to 20 with the possibility of further increasing the number of ADA spaces if determined necessary once the facility is operational. It should be noted that the current design phase plan accommodates 237 parking spaces with 20 accessible spaces. LandscZge ng The project proposes substantial landscaping throughout the site. An approximately 20,000 square foot open space area including a 10,000 square foot lawn, is located to the rear of the building. In addition to the lawn, the open space area includes a trellis patio, an area designed for a demonstration or hummingbird garden, a walking path with benches, a courtyard fountain area, and planting areas featuring meadow grasses and native plants. Landscaping is also proposed throughout the parking area, as required by the HBZSO. This landscaping will incorporate bioswales and serve as a natural treatment system for stormwater runoff. The proposed landscape plan shows a mix of native and non-native drought tolerant vegetation able to support a wide range of climate conditions and soils. As required by code, "smart irrigation controllers" or other technology to reduce runoff will be used for the project. Although the proposed landscape plans show species that occur at adjacent uses, staff is recommending that the final landscape plans show a variety of tree, shrub and grass species that occur at adjacent uses, such as the Shipley Nature Center and the Sports Complex. A natural meadow area is also proposed for the northwest corner of the project site. The proposed project site consists of approximately 28% landscaped area, The proposed landscape plans were reviewed by the Design Review Board and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2009. Pursuant to the recommended conditions of approval if the project design and landscape plans change substantially from the 2009 City Council approved plans at the time of plan check submittal, the plans would require further Design Review Board review and Planning Commission approval. Urban Resign Guidelines Conformance: The Huntington Beach Urban Design Guidelines do not include guidelines specific to paxk and recreation facilities in the OS-PR zoning district. Notwithstanding, the project generally conforms to the objectives and standards for non-residential projects contained in the Guidelines, including the following: • Establish attractive, inviting, imaginative and functional site arrangement of buildings and parking areas and high quality architectural and landscape design which provides for proper access, visibility an identity. ® The designer is expected to employ variations in form, building details and siting in order to create visual interest. In all cases, the selected architectural style should be employed on all building elevations. PC Staff Report— 1/24/12 11 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Renior f.emter) HB -495- Item 15. - 128 • Buildings should be divided in distinct massing elements. Building facades should be articulated with architectural elements and details. Vertical and horizontal offsets should be provided to minimize building bulk. ■ Vertical architectural elements such as towers should be used as focal points. • Developments should incorporate plazas and courtyards into their design. Courtyards should be buffered from the street, parking areas and drive aisles. Environmental Status: The project's potential environmental impacts are analyzed and discussed in a separate staff report. Prior to any action on General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R), it is necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002 (separate report). Staff, in its initial study of the project, is recommending that Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002 be certified as adequate and complete with mitigation measures, Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Although the project results in adverse cumulative impacts to the environment that cannot be mitigated or avoided, the Planning Commission may still approve the project if a Statement of Overriding Considerations is adopted. CEQA requires decision makers to balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the City may consider the adverse environmental effects acceptable. In this particular case, staff believes the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the adverse impact to Aesthetics. The cumulative adverse Aesthetic impact is a result of the overall loss of undeveloped open space in Central Park. That being said, approval of the project will provide a new state-of-the-art senior center designed for innovative programming to meet the needs of a multi-generational senior population. The project also provides a centrally located senior center that will be large enough to meet current and future demand of an increasing senior population in the City of Huntington Beach. Development of the project also results in a temporary increase in employment opportunities due to project construction. Following approval of the General Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must approve a CEQA Statement of Findings of Fact with a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Attachment No. 3). Coastal Status: Not applicable. Redevelopment Status: Not applicable. Design Review Board: The project was preliminarily reviewed by the Design Review Board (DRB) on August 9, 2007 prior to the previous project approval. Subsequent to the previous project approval, the Design Review Board reviewed the final project design and landscape plans on June 11, 2009, which were subsequently approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. If changes to the project design and landscape ""c' .=T3---rt_ 1/24/12 12 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Senior Center) Item 15. - 129 HB -496- plans are made from the 2009 plans, the project would require additional review by the Design Review Board. Subdivision Committee: Not applicable. Community Services Commission: The Community Services Commission approved the proposed senior center project at their meeting on November 14, 2007. Other Departments Concerns and Requirements: The planning, design and site layout of the proposed senior center project reflect the recommendations of the Planning and Building, Public Works, Community Services, Police and Fire Departments. The analysis and conclusions included in Subsequent EIR No. 07-002 reflect and are based in part on consultation with the Building Division in addition to the Departments of Community Services,Economic Development, Fire,Police,Public Works and the City Attorney's Office. As the voice for senior residents in the City, the Council on Aging (COA), via the Community Services Department,provided input on the site plan and interior layout of the proposed senior center. Public Notification: Legal notice was published in the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Independent on January 12, 2012, and notices were sent to property owners of record and occupants within a 2,000 ft. radius of the subject property, individuals/organizations requesting notification (Planning and Building Department's Notification Matrix), and other interested parties. As of January 17, 2012, one comment letter on the project and SEIR has been received (Attachment No. 8). The comment letter raises questions and concerns about the project based on the previously approved Central Park Master Plan, which is summarized in the Background section of this report. Application Processing Dates: DATE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S): Draft SEIR: September 15, 2011 Within 1 year of complete application(September 15, 2012) Conditional Use Permit: September 15, 2011 Within 180 days from EIR Certification(March 13, 2013) General Plan Amendment: Not Applicable Not Applicable PC Staff Report-1/24/12 Ts (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 H B -497- Item 15. - 130 ANALYSIS: No changes from the previously approved CUP request are proposed. However, since the court ruling required the City to set-aside the project approval, the project must go through the CUP approval process again. In addition, the court ruling also determined that the City violated the General Plan by allowing the senior center on an area designated for low-intensity uses on the Central Park Master Plan. Therefore, a General Plan Amendment is proposed to respond to the court ruling and ensure that the project would be consistent with the Central Park Master Plan and thus, the General Plan. General Plan Amendment The senior center site is part of a larger 14-acre area designated on the 1999 Central Park Master Plan for low intensity recreational uses. It was envisioned that the area would be developed with passive park uses and include such amenities as a tot lot, benches and tables, a picnic shelter, restrooms and parking. Vehicular access to the passive park area would be via a planned driveway at the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue. Because the senior center facility would be considered an active recreation use and the intensity of development on the project site would be increasing over its current designation, the Central Park Master Plan must be amended for the 5-acre senior center site. The site would be re-designated from a low intensity area to a high intensity area. Furthermore, as the Central Park Master Plan is referenced in the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan, a new Central Park Master Plan exhibit is proposed to be incorporated into the Recreation and Community Services Element. The proposed change from a low intensity recreation area to a high intensity recreation area would not cause a significant reduction in the overall amount of passive/low intensity recreation area in Central Park. In fact, the change in intensity for the 5-acre site represents a 1.5%reduction in passive recreation area in Central Park and is negligible when considered Citywide. The change would not affect the ability of the City to meet the current"parkland per capita"ratio of five acres per 1,000 residents and would result in no difference in the current ratio of 5.25 acres per 1,000 residents. Furthermore, in the context of the undeveloped 14-acre low intensity area, the development footprint of the building is approximately one acre, which constitutes less than 10 percent of the total undeveloped area. As discussed under the General Plan Conformance section of this report, the project, including the proposed General Plan Amendment, would be consistent with other elements of the General Plan. Land Use Compatibility The proposed project, as modified by suggested conditions of approval and the mitigation measures contained in SEIR No. 07-002, is consistent with the applicable General Plan Land Use and Zoning designations of Open Space—Park (OS-P) and Open Space —Park and Recreation (OS-PR), respectively. Although the proposed project would result in the development of a new senior center on existing open space, the project will be compatible with the established recreational land use pattern in the area, specifically existing community facilities such as the Central Library and Sports Complex adjacent to the proposed project site. Within this context, the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding parkland. The nearest adjacent residences are located approximately 800 feet west of the project site. Mitigation measures incorporated in SEIR No. 07-002 ensure that residences in the vicinity will not be detrimentally impacted. In addition, the proposed project will add a senior recreation facility on land n'-="__--t_ 1/24/12 14 (12sr02 CUP 07-39RIGPA 11-004 Senior Center) Item 15. - 131 HB -498- currently designated for recreational uses but at a greater intensity than what was previously intended for the site. However, the change in intensity represents a less than significant reduction in passive open space in Central Park. Additionally, there are other parks in the vicinity of the project site with passive recreation area such that the reduction is even less significant from a cumulative Citywide perspective. To integrate the project with the natural setting of the Shipley Nature Center and existing passive parkland west of the project site, substantial landscaping is proposed throughout the site, including surrounding the entire perimeter of the project site. The proposed landscaping includes species that are currently found at Shipley Nature Center, the Sports Complex and the passive parkland to the west. As discussed in the SETR for the project, the integrity of environmental resources on and surrounding the site will be maintained or mitigated. Grade Differential The 5-acre project site is situated in a relatively low-lying area bordered by ascending slopes on the north, east and south sides. An earthen berm is located north of the project site and will be used for construction of the access driveway to the site from Goldenwest Street. The site is bordered on the east by a slope ascending up to Goldenwest Street and on the south by a slope ascending up to the disc golf course facility. These slopes are at an elevation of approximately 39 feet above mean sea level (MSL). Meanwhile, the project site gradually slopes to the west from an elevation of approximately 26 feet above MSL near the southeast corner of the site to approximately 14 feet above MSL near the southwest corner of the site. Therefore, the adjacent slopes are elevated anywhere from 13 to 25 feet above the project site. According to the conceptual grading plan, at finished grade, the facility will be at an elevation of approximately 22 1/2 feet above MSL. The project is designed with minimal cut and fill such that the surrounding slopes and drainage patterns will not be negatively impacted and are generally maintained as they currently exist. Green Building The proposed project emphasizes compatibility and sensitivity to the existing uses surrounding the site and will include a variety of sustainable features, such as bioswales, drought-tolerant landscaping, waterless urinals, roofing materials, and installation of low-flow water devices. The City is actively pursuing the feasibility of including additional features that would bring the building closer to LEER certification. As such, a standard condition of approval has been incorporated to ensure the consideration of green building elements into the design of the project. Proiect Design and Architecture The proposed project features an architectural design that will blend, to the extent possible, with the park setting of the surrounding area. Materials include an abundance of wood, glass, stone and stucco. The design also incorporates a variety of forms, wall planes, roof lines, offsets, exterior finish materials and decorative architectural elements such as a wood trellis patio and an outdoor fountain courtyard area. The proposed standing seam metal roofing material reduces cooling requirements and is energy efficient. Overall,the proposed architectural design provides visual interest and minimizes massing. PC Staff Report— 1/24/12 15 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 HB -499- Item 15. - 132 The proposed building is a one-story building with an average height of 30 feet. Parapets, towers and other architectural features reach up to 46 feet in height. However, because the project site is in a low- lying area relative to the adjacent slopes, the average roofline of the proposed senior center will only project up to 13 %2 feet higher than the slopes to the south and east. Architectural features could extend an additional 16 feet above the average roofline. Being that the project site is situated at a lower elevation, the mass and bulk of the building, as viewed from Goldenwest Street, are further reduced and distant views of the park beyond the project site can still be captured to some degree. SUMMARY: Staff is recommending approval of the project based on the suggested findings and subject to the suggested conditions of approval. The proposed project furthers General Plan goals, objectives, and policies that encourage the establishment of uses that support the needs of existing and future Huntington Beach residents when compatible with and sensitive to adjacent uses. In addition, the project would provide a centrally located senior recreation facility large enough to meet current and future demand of an increasing senior population in the City of Huntington Beach. The project has been designed to comply with all applicable zoning regulations of the OS-PR zoning designation. Finally, the proposed project entitlements and SEIR comply with the court ruling as a result of the lawsuit challenging the project's approval and CEQA compliance as described in Attachment No. 7. ATTACIMENTS: �. .3 1. Dnft GAy Geunei4 Resolution No. , Approving g,ne=al Plea~ Amendment Ne 11 0 n�M�' 4- Pro' Pl. , dated Oeteber 17, f111'7 1'�L rrf i:�a kc t iF�r� �� A44,x 6 S. Mifiga ieii Meese d Reps! egf m—SEIRNe. 07 n r f T ;,, I > dated My 5, 2011, !?t4, S. Comment Letter from Robert Schwanz, dated and received January 17, 2012 �, - (!r ,, nn t— 1/24/12 16 (12sr02 CUP 07-39R/GPA 11-004 Senior Center) Item 15. - 133 HB -500- I. 17.lanuary2012 Ms Jennifer Villasenor,Senior Planner City of Huntington Beach Planning Departments _ 2000 Main Street,Third Floor �� ; Huntington beach,CA 92648 7 00-K Of i''itu""into Email:SVillasenor@surlcity-hb.org Re:FSEIR 07-002 Dear Ms Villasenor, Attached are my comments on the Filial Subsequent EIR 07-D02. Thank you for the opportunity to identify some problem areas in the City of Huntington Beach(City) responses and to suggest some solutions. My review of the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report 07-002(FSEIR 07-002) indicates it may contain two(2)errors. The first error is the use of the non-native grasslands for environmental mitigation in FSEIR 07-002,that have previously been committed(1999)to environmental mitigation in FMEIR 99-1. Recall FMEIR 99-1 defined environmental mitigation actions that allowed construction of the ball fields east of Golden West and south of Talbert. The'second error is an out-of-date(1997-1998)and materially inaccurate figure(fig 3-9;pg.3- 21,FSEIR 07-002) defining the"Central Park Master Plan of Uses". This old 1997-1998 figure was not properly corrected in FMEIR 99-1 and is grossly misleading if used before the City Council,the City Boards and Commissions,the City Staff and the public. In nay opinion these two errors need to be corrected before the Senior Center EIR 07-002 proceeds. These errors are easily correctable,possibly avoiding future court actions. First, on page 10-66 of 5EIR 07-002 in response to comment BAR-2,the City proposes to use the natural park non-native grassland areas already set aside in FMEIR 99-1. In FMEIR 99-1 these areas(41..2 acres of non-native grasslands)were reserved to mitigate the destruction of 68 acres of significant environmental habitat during the construction of the ball fields. For background on the first error,please refer to the following attached figures from the Final Master Environmental Impact,Report FIVIEIR 99-1("Environmental Findings of Fact and Statement of overriding Considerations,Master Plan of Recreation Uses for Central park,"City of Huntington Beach,California;State Clearinghouse Number 9709W07;dated June 22,1999). Attached figures 1 through 10 contain data extracted from FMEIR 99-1 and establish the amount, fio.c ation,definition and shape of the existing non-native grass areas governed by FMEIR 99-1. The,figures 11 and 12 present the data from FIVIEIR 99-1 on a 2008 aerial photograph. The annotated aerial photo prove no available non=native grasslands exist in the natural park area to mitigate the significant environmental destruction of 7.8 acres as proposed in FSEIR 07-002. Another solution must be found for mitigation in FSEIR 07-002. Figure 1 f pg12-15) responds to 'significant'CEQA comments by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service)and the CA Department of Fish and Game(CDFG)by conserving 41.2 �V �F� •'''t�;i.;y;�yL � Icy L l i HB -501- Item 15. - 134 acres of non-native grasslands in four(4) elements of the Master Plan(Low intensity Recreation Use Area (7.8 acres),Sully Miller Lake Group Facility(5.8 acres),Semi-active Recreation Area (1.6 acres)and Midden Area/Urban Forest/Tra il head{26 acres)). The 41.2 acres of conserved non-native grasslands in FMEIR 99-1 are also cited on pg 12 of the HB City Staff Report to City Council,dated 7-13-99 and are discussed in more detail in the pages to be cited next- Figure 2(page 3.7-43,Table 3.7-3)defines the individual acreages comprising the 41.2 acres of non-native grasslands. The Service and CDFG required a substantial modification of the four elements containing non-native grasses_ The City implemented the corrections to the four elements in the ©Ells 99-1 in 1999 and successfully mitigated the "significant"CEQA comments of the Service and CDFG. The City created "natural parks"free of development, but oriented to equestrians, bicyclists,hikers and ether park goers.These natural parks require minimal financial investment,but diligent management attention by the City staff. Figure 3 (page3.7-47)states the City Will use a.1:1 ratio of conserved ages of non-native grasslands[41_2 acres)to that destroyed by construction of the ball fields [68 acres according to CDFG]. it is not explained how 41.2 acres equals 68 acres for the Ciity's 1:1 ratio. The City states its enhancing of non-native grasslands would include but not be limited to planting of native trees within and adjacent to the four parcels comprising the 41.2 acres,enhancing the area for raptors[and beautify the area for equestrians, hikers, bicyclists and other park goers]. Figure 4(pg 11-17) indicates the City specifies the City Planning Department as responsible for planning, monitoring and enforcing the mitigation of the significant environmental impactfrom the ball fields using the 41.2 acres of non-native grasslands specified in figs 1,2 and 3 above Figures 5, 6, 7,S and 9(Ws 3.7-44, 3.7-44 continued,3.7-45, 3.1-45 continued and 3.7- 46) define the 41.2 acres of non-native grasslands in detail,set limits on their extent and define future use. Interestingly,4 acres of the 7.8 acres of non-native grasslan6 in the Lowe Intensity Recreation Use area is further identified in figure S for additional enhancement for"federally designated sensitive birds, including raptors". Figure 10(fag 2-16)defines the 43-2 acres(26 acres non-native grassers and 17.2 acres Urban Forest)of the Midden Area/Urban Forest/Trailhead as an`L-shaped"parcel located south of the existing dog park and Equestrian Center, west of Golden West Street,north of Ellis Avenue,and east of Edwards Street_ This described area inadvertently contains approximately 7.5 acres of private property(52 encyclopedia lots per the OC Assessor's Office (1-1-2011)and 2 oil leases). Figure 10 also defines the 8 acres for the Semi-active Recreation area as west of Golden West Street immediately northwest of the intersection of Ellis Avenue and Golden West Street. As will be shorn subsequently;this was a mis-definition which would prevent the CAA requirements for a S Item 15. - 135 HB -502- 41.2 acres of non-native grasses to not be met by FMEIR 99-7. The arithmetic was faulty,as the correct development area for the Semi-active Recreation Area is 2.9 acres. Figure 11 combines the data in figures 1 through 10,showing the Midden Area/Urban Forest/Trailhead Area and Semi-active Recreation Area on a 2008 aerial photograph of the natural park area in Central Park. Note the 25 acre Equestrian Center, the two oil leases,the representative scattered encyclopedia kits,the non- native grasslands,the Urban Forest and the many overly-wide,randomly formed, multi- use trails. Examination of the figure shows these trails partially thwart the mitigation efforts of the City Planning Department which is responsible for managing the natural park identified in FMEIR 99-1. The Planning Department, in conjunction with the Public Works Department,could consider relocating the trails to snore suitable nearby locations and reduce erosion In the large watershed. Figure 12 adds the.logical boundaries of the Midden Area/Urban Forest/Traihead area and the Semi-active Recreation area to fig. 1L The City could not use the private/leased property to mitigate the ball parVs significant impact on non-native grassla nd without the owners'/leases'permission. Thus 3.5 acres(7-5acres-4.0 acres for the Brindal-Thomas lease)of the Midden Area/Urban Forest/Trailhead acres logicalty lay on City owned property in the former AC Marion parcel. Much of this parcel was incorrectly assigned to the Semi-active Recreation area, which has only 1.6 acres of non- native grasses assigned to mitigation. As a consequence 5.1 acres(L6 acres from fig.2 plus 3.5 acres of City's compensation for the unavailable private property)of the Semi- active Recreation Area belong in the non-native grass mitigation areas under FMEIR 99- 1. The resutt means there are 2.9 acres in the Semi-active Recreation Area for development or potential non-native grass mitigation effort under FSEI R 07-002. Unfortunately the area has already been developed by the City to provide overflow parking for the Equestriian center,placing approximately fifty-five, 3 to 6 foot,vertical poles 20-30 feet apart over the area. The area is not presently used by raptors because these poles would break the wings of diving raptors. If the poles were removed under FSEIR 07-002 it would partially mitigate 2.9 acres of the 7.8 acre non-native grassland losses in the Low Intensity Recreation area, provided the area is reseeded until non- native grasses naturally recover. In summary,for error 1 in BFIR 07-002, the destruction of 7.8 acres of non- native grasses in the Low Intensity Recreation Area can't be mitigated using the natural park area already committed by the Crty in FIVIEIR 99-L However,before beginning construction of the Senior Center the City could purchase the 3.5 acres of private property located in the natural park,and also eliminate the 55 poles in the 2.9 acre Equestrian Center overflow'parking area. This action would expand the City-owned area available for environmental mitigation in the natural park to 6.4 acres, partially compensating for the environmental destruction of 7.8 acres in the Low Intensity Recreation Area. 0, ./ HB -503- Item 15. - 136 If the first error in FSEIR 07-002 discussed above is verified by the City,a rewriting of MM 4.3-2 and pages 4.3-22 and 4.3-23 in FSERI 07-002 is required before - going forward for approval. The rewritten section would identify an uncommitted non- native grasses area and propose an enforceable City action plan to mitigate the destruction of grasslands by the Senior Center,as was done previously for the ball park construction in FMEIR 99-1. Second,there seems to be a substantial error in response to CI_8-20 in the SEIB 07-007(pg. 10-57)as shown in attached figure 13. It is stated by the City that figure 3-9 on pg 3-21(same as figure 1.0-4 in FMEIR 99-1)describes the existing and proposed land uses for Central Park. In fact figure 3-9(created in 1997-1998)was riot updated in 1999 for FMEIR 99-1 to reflect the two(2)years of subsequent changes in Central Park land use specified in the August 1999.dated Final Master Environmental Impact Report for the baseball gelds. The correct Central Park land usage has been discussed in figures 1 through 12- Other obvious anomalies and errors in figure 3-9 of FSEIR 07-002 are called out in attached figure 13: (1)the mislabeling of the location of the "Semi-active Recreation Area",(2)the construction of a parking lot in the"Urban Forest"on top of a 'State of California Waters'CDFG stream called Ellis Creek, (3)several incorrect boundaries for the 25 acre Equestrian Center lease,(4)the failure to indicate private property and leases(encyclopedia lots,small oil lease on Ellis Avenue and Brindle/Thomas oil lease),(5) improper legal reference date,(6)incorrect word descriptions from FMEIR 99-1 and (7) other errors. I think enclosed fijure 14 represents a corrected version of the natural park area to be considered part of figure 3.9 in FSEIR 07-W2. Figure 14 shows a large non-native grass area,private property,a distributed Urban Forest and an overflow parking area for the Equestrian center. However,figure 14 still leaves the 7.8 acres of non-native grass mitigation for.FSEIR 07- 002 undefined,although some suggestions were made.herein. In no case should the existing and outdated figure 3-9 be Incorporated into the "Central Park Master Plan of Uses" in FSEIR 07-b02(it was incorrect in FMEIR 99-1)or into pages III-RCS-2 of the"Recreation and Community Services Element". As already stated the current figure 3.9 shows erroneous Information and out-of-date content; it fails to reflect the City of Huntington Beach decisions and commitments in FMEIR 99-1. After figure 3-9 is updated and corrected for the FMEIR 99-1 and the FSEIR 07-002. mitigation plans, it should be annotated at the bottom of the figure to the calendar date preceding the City Council approval of FSEIR 07-002- This new date would assure correct planning data are presented to the City Council, the City Commissions and Boards,the City staff and the public at all times. Thank you for considering and reacting to my comments. I would be happy to share and discuss the FMEIR 99-1 data with the City Planning Department. It benefits FSEIR 07-002 to have an accurate definition of the "present case" non-native grassland mitigation areas called Low Intensity Recreation Area,the Semi-active Recreation Area, Item 15. - 137 HB -504- the Midden Area/Urban Forest/Traithead Area and the Sully Miller Lake Group Recreation Area as defined in WEIR 99-1.. These areas contain many multiuse trails for equestrians, hikers,bicyclists and other park goers. Other areas such as the English-like parks in north Central Parts are more monolithic,supporting a smaller biological set of animals and birds for the public to view and enjoy. The natural park areas of non-native grasses and native trees are unique in Huntington Beach because they represent a complete biological environment far the smallest insect prey to the largest and most aggressive raptors. The natural park area connects Sully Miller}eke area to the Balsa Chica Reserve and the Harriett M.Wieder Regional Park,maintaining a wildlife corridor. Ever more importantly, natural parks have minimal costs compared to other types of E parks during a tight budget time period_ Sincerely, Robert C Schwanz,PhD 714-745-3081(cell) 1113 -505- Item 15. - 138 Comment In their letter of ccirnrrrent,the U4 Fish an Wildfire Servicea� the California Deparpmnt of Fish and Game� rcated that`ihe proposed rojeet nr NesuEt in direct or indirect,adverse Ueffects to fan state and federally endangered ties: the California least ter n, �egrrne con- least Ot's vi and southw n vv�w flycatcher. In addition the t ati ornra Department Fish and ame identified State Species of e�cial Con ern that would be potentiall effected the proposed project;white-tailed kite tricolored b5ackbird;Cooper's hawk an7lo%er d i shrike. It is the conclusion of the Service that general wildlife surveys were conducted durin winter and ade�uate surveys for these or other listed and sensitive species have not been done and apparently will riot be done until prior m the oommencemerTt of construction activities or or 3 to "moving forward� vvy'�th program level elrents." Therefore potential impacts to these species cannot be disclosed nor appropriately mitigated per CEQA requirements. Cornmentorts): Service(8) Response: See response to comments No.4,5,6,7. Potential impacts on federally listed species are addressed in Section 3.73 of the MEIR. As indicated in Table 3.7-1 of the MEIR the California least tern is not kr ►wn currentl or historically krom Huntington Cen�r Park and the pro grarrl and proj ect lev elerrtents o the proposed project are not expected to have any impact an this federalty and state listed species. As indicated in able 3.7--1 of the MEIR, the peregrine {ikon is Hated on t Kunt ngttrn Central Park Bi fist as a rare species year round, primarily in assflciatian cos the;Sripiey Nature Cent. proposed Master Plan does not include any modifications to urban forest or disturbed rip2gan habitats found' asso -ation with the Shi ley N Center or jack Green Nature�tedtoArea. e effect conversion vereq infrequent rviisits.by�ee peregrine corarreas of the Parfc would not be As indicated in Section 3.7.3 of the MEIR,areas under consideration for dr velopment of e o pr ert level elemen of the proposed Master Plan do not support suitable habitat Tor soumvvestern willow ttyca and least Sell's vireo. With the exception of the Sully Miller Lake Group Facilit�r,areas under consideration for development of program level l elements of the proposed Master Plan do not so rt sortable habitat tar sou#}rwestern willow flycatcher or least Bell's vireo_ Suitable habitat of'r these species rs pnmarrly limited to the Shipley Nature Center and lads Green IvatUre Ar a which ar not the sub'ert of the proposed Mater Plan. See Response to Service C5)far 4n ormation rated to addi�'► aI doGurnentation that will be undertaken f� southwestern unllo�v flycatcher and feast Belt'syirea prior.to completing the environmental memtation for the ull Miller take Grou adli (n response to caanmesztsrpvided by t3►ee Service and the Deparhnen the C has revised the oject rnplion f� rtf a Low Intensity Recreation Area and t Midden AreaAJrban crest!frareacl program level elements of the pr Master Pfan to minimize th loss of pp��ttee��tral foraging 1>abitat for birds considered ta�sensitive by the Service an by the Department. See Clarifications and Revisions to pages 2-16 and 2-17 of tf► MEIR undertaken to minimize srnpatts on potentially suitable foraging habitat for State and Federally designated sensitive birds,including-raptors. See Clarifications and Revisions to p ges 3.7-44 and 3.7-45 and Table 3.7-3 of the MEIR for clarification that the rogram level et_ is can be undertaken i�1 a manr�ner that minimizes mpacts on potentially suitable foraging for State and Federall des�r Hated sensitive irds, includin r�ptors, In response to comments received from the�J 5.l-Fsh and Wildlife Servics and the�liforraa Department of Fish and Game,ft City of Huntington Beach revised four elements of the Master Plart to increase conservation of non-native grasslands: Low- I aensity Recreation Use Area,Sully Miller take Group Facility,Semi Active Recreation,and Hidden AreaNrban Forest/Trailhead. Central Park currently super 72 acr .of rim-native ass and thatare subject to annual mowing or disc ng for fire canfrol_ The Tn ration to the ast®r Plan delineated in the C:Iprifications and Revisions would result in conservation of 41.2 acres 57%)of non-native grassland within Central Park. Huntington Central Park]blaster Kan of Recreation Uses Final Master Environmental Impact Report June 22, 1999 Page 12-15 Vih V%OIECM1096-004tUR1RTC1 T09b-W4.INT pp Item 15. - 139:t HB -SQ6- TABLE 3.7.3 IMPACTS TO EXISTING BIOTIC COMMUNITIES FROM MASTER MN IMPROVEMENTS HUNTINGTON CENTRAL PAkk,OTY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH `Bl®TIC COMM!!#�tIT1r. . ,Pt'�SrY `. `Propect:ItrtpactS '-'�PCC[DflStrOt"llOtt' .tA6.M, "�_ ''G�eres}' i Landscaped 80 6C5 -024(2) 64.5 -13(3) +9.6(3) -13 24(4) ++5-.41 (5)2 +1.9(7? +44a48.fs(8)2 Urban Forest 20 20-2 — 20.2 +�9 (fib Non-native 72 "Dal A-5-411.4(5? 3-151& 5? Grassland 2 -4S-'2jZ.-2(6? +�4:+F {51a /•L Q�T4 L -4:6&0—(7? 1-6 U)! DistL'bed Riparian 34 21.9 11.7(8)2 21.9 Ruderal]llwe 55 5.8 -43.2 0) & -5.8(Sf Water Features 21 21.1 — 21.1 Developed" 74 69.1 -4-8(9) 69.1 +43.2 0) - +0 24(2) +3.4(3)_ +0.24(4) i 4�8(tiffs +�r1 (7}r +4.8(W +4.8(9)2 Total 356 M 07.3 3S5.3 P"iect Level Elea"15 Pmr!ram level El rajwW CQ Sports RaW Complex (5)law-atensrty Recreation Area (2)Park Tree aced Lvxkcape (6)Mullen Arealthbarr Foresitfr4lhead 1Makderrance Yard expansion 0 5= Active Reaeatim Area (3)Consolidated C,mping Area Use Area (d)Outdoor Music Area 0 Sully&infer Lake GroW Facility (9)Powciviliaa Cart Raage'. ' Devetoped acreage hLeWas&3 acres of paved trails theooghoat the park r Impacts from Prograta&eve)elemews are estknated Based on ex6iiog design plans. A more detasW xr►*A.of irn¢ac is is required when the projects.nmve forward as capital improvements. a The PokvJ0 lBam Gun Range wiR msuk in"acres of impact to existing developed property. Huntington Central Park Master Plan of Recreation Uses final Master Environmental Impact Report June 22, 1999 Page 3.7-43 W:IPROJFCT3l 1 D96-004(EIRiCNRl1096-00QSl3 "7"ZA �-A, .•HB -507- �u Item 15. - 140 rn Measure Biological Resources 3- Directed surveys for six sensitive plant species that have the potential to be present in non-native grassland, southern tarplant(Hemi7onia parryi ssp- austratis), Coulter's goldfields (Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri}, Coulters saitbush (Atriplex coulter), south coast saitscale (Atriplex pacifica?, many- stedimed dudleya (Dudleya multicaubs), and intermediate Mariposa lily (Calochortus weedii var. intenvedius) will be conducted prior to moving forward with program leve-1 elements which will impact non-native grasslands within the Park. Dfrecfed suneW for the slx sensitiveplae will he conducted in acccudance Stith-the U.S. Fish and,WikW e 5g4'vice and .California D-ep-aAmga of flr h and G@Mg publiftd nrotocois for such surveys at the time Ohat such AMrMs are u e�qr In the ahmwe of-g Vtsblished Rant ,sttch surirM ill be-andertaken in accordant with Guidehr es for Aimee - the [I'f M of proWsed d2eve1cWMWis an Rare and &aadarrgerc PlantA and C_Qmmani es plegnred by 4he California EDesar�Ont®f F and Game. Measure Biological resources 4- Potential impacts to foraging habitat for raptors resulting from development of non-native grasslands in the Park could be mitigated by enhancing v ad cmeugd areas of no native grassigin at a ratio of 1:1 for aces of impact pn► - naive grassland to provide suitable habitat values and_ funs ic3ns for des raMm Mfigat_gn for jMocts tart "ativ grassland avill be accerrsplisld wiffiin Wnserved native grasAands in associafiox+vyit> } Willer Grp Faci- tt'LLow InU220ft Recreation AM, Sen i-Active Recreation Area,and MkickenAreat roan tlt'raiftadl. of exisfinT foreging habitat Ea-ha_mcement of non:m hm g - vW MMLId_jKlude,but lmdbe fimkd IQ.he pl O ft t3 natixe within and afiacw(to fiamrved amm of non- r�ative grassla_ Measure Biological Resources 5- Potential impacts resulting from implementation of the Sully Miller Lake Group Facility element would be mitigated through creation and enhancement of disturbed riparian habitats in the Shipley Nature Center and Talbert Lake-meadow at a ratio of 3:1 for acres of impact Measure gigkt:W Resources G- Concurrent with gWrafign al the Sports Codex, the City sue}krnFlamm#or causes to be iowl—emmated I bmwn-headed co-Wbird t ram. he !grown-headed ORWi t topgn=pnMm w 1 be i&mitted 19 the Servece r review a c _mat leash threg Maatha RCKw to ft beginning of Huntktgtan Central Park Master Plan of Recreation Uses Final Maker fnvhwmental Impact Report June 72, 7999 Fs ge 3-7-47 W.-1PROJECTSI 1096-0O41EMCNRi 7095-004-513 Item 15. - 14h 5 i�7 HBy-;o8_ i i t Measure WollagiCal Resourco"t 1K K X ington u n$ ty Hurotingron ty Potential Impacts to foraging habitat for rsptors resulting from development of non Cieach 1 1eR`ovIa,,'P`.r,.nt vh,Plnative graslands In the Park could be mitigated by enhancing conserved erase of non Department Beach, tanning (rnie art bnitatng Rsyoru, is inswnJosra orrdananit gFgrnct7 Mat ive grassland at a ratio of 1:i for acres of import on norrnativo grassland to provide to CEQA Department so to hasltet values and functions for raptors.Mitigation for impacts on nonnative grassland will be accomplished within conserved nonnative grasslands Itt association rn+ia MWn tatng ttepoN RtgranaemaAa aMaurass A�r�l with the Sully Miller Lake Croup Facility,low Intensity Recreation Area,Semi-Active Recreation Area,and Middan Area7Urban ForestlTrailhead.Enhancement of non-nadve grassland would include,but not be limited to,the planting o(native trans within and ttaie ot.Monttorh g rt�o a ISsnstu of Monlmr na t9anM adjacat�t to conserved areas of nott-rtativs granland. . (fuser Manawinpaepistr lglgeuture+Wct Monitar{na�M , ptde Manitorina i5tgna4ttrpiWea Ma+tOorfngheencV7 • ' i Mt re 8 a ca esoarcet 8t o un n on r or rya un n an n Potential impacts resulting from implementation of 11no Jully Miller lake Group Fadilty Beach , . Implementation Beach, Huntington elament would be mitlgated through rreattan and enhancement of disturbed riparian of sull Miller Cammurtlty Beach,Planning habitats in the Shipley filature Center and Talbert lake•Meadow at a ratio of 3.1 for lake Group services Department acres of Impact, Facility Cement DoperUnant ttntcetlwonl Renate ltignatwalt7atr MonhatngAaeney) Measure 010togtral ReIMUMS! I X. City cf kuntington frost- sty ai Huntington City of �. Cuncurcentwith operation of the Sports Complex,the City shell Implement or cruse to Beach Consvuc ion Beach, Hundngton be lmoomenmd a brown-hooded eowblyd irapping pr. am,The lxowrrheaded Community Beach,Planning' ' cowbird trapping peogrism wilt be submitted to the Service for revlaw and comment at Services Ospartment leant three months prior to the beginning of grading, ` Department ; Traps used to remove cowbirds will be modified Australian crow traps. These traps 1 U.S,Fish and allow live capture of birds so that non-target birds can be relessed.unharmed,The,traps Wildlife servlce (� will hw'bafted"with live juvenile or female brown-headed cowbirds which will be captured prior to the trapping period with balled-trap;or mist nets.The Juvenile or vi " famalls'cowbirds ottreti tra attention of adult birds and sure them Into traps, Once O :,A krslda the tra ,It If dlffIcukfor the birds to escapq inti they can be easily removed. ;�• Approximate four bolt birds are kept Ina separate cage within the trap and ar¢not removed uno the trapping season Is over.The traps will be placed and maintained so as to provide trapped and haft birds ample shade,lood,'and water while they are in. traps.All cowbirds(mile,female,and juvenile)that are caught In thatrapa wilt be "3 disposed of humanely. p' Trapping will take place during the nesting period of ripwim bird species found In Central Peak that are known so be parasitized by brown-headed cowbirds,Traps will be checked daily during the trapping period Id remove both trapped cowbirds and non- (angst species,which will be released, Belt birds lost topredation ar escape will be j reptaced during the deify checks, An annual letter report documentingg the results of the trapping program will be• submitted to the U.S;Fish and Wlidille Service,Results of the trapping program will be Worded including the data and time of trap checking,observer(s)weather,aagge of frlJe of dbnitorlt a Repots liisnswr doteeai MoNm inaHan<yl trapped birds(both target and non-target species),the treatment 07ths birds(whether i released,disposed of,or retairiad as bait birds),and alher data pertainirtg to any unusual event such as predation or loss of balk birds. Huntington Cgntrif Pork Master Plan cf Recraadon Usam - MftlYatien MaaitorinPat gIJ-77 ' June 22,1999 W:1PRO7k��lde8•ooalhrMPln%tTMNPI.�tfa.ra r .p Party Tree and Landscape Maintenance Yard Expansion The expansion of the current Park,Tree and Landscape Maintenance Yard is expected to total 0.24 acres. All impacts will occur to landscaped portions of the Park. All shrub plantings removed by grading and construction will be replaced along the new perimeter of the facility. No trees will be removed by the Park, Tree and Landscape Maintenance Yard expansion. The expansion of the maintenance yard is not expected to result in significant impacts to plant Communities in Huntington Central Park.A small disturbed riparian area exists adjacent to the area planned for the expansion of the Park,Tree and Landscape Maintenance Yard No significant impacts to wildlife are expected unless impacts to the nearby distiurbed riparian habitat occur during grading and associated collateral construction disturbance. Passible sensitive species which could be impacted by disturbance of disturbed riparian habitat are:yellow warbler,Virginia's warbler,yellow-breasted chat,Cooper's hawk, and sharp-shinned hawk. Consolidated Camping Area The Consolidated Camping Area is planned to impact a total of 13 acres. All impacts will occur to landscaped }property and existing developed land. As currently designed, the consolidated campground borders on disturbed riparian habitat,an environmentally important;habitat in Huntington Central Park_ A small finger of disturbed riparian habitat runs into the proposed campground area. Two sensitive species which may occur in this habitat are least Bell's vireo (federally-and state-listed as endangered)and southwest willow flycatcher(state listed as endangered). Both species have been recorded from Huntington Central Park.The southwestern willow flycatcher may have bred in the past at H66fiii&n Central Park(Gallagher 1997). Copper's hawk and yellow warbler may also utilize this habitat when present at Huntington Central Park. Impacts to disturbed riparian habitat would be considered significant if any of these sensitive species are determined to be present. Outdoor Music Area The proposed enhancement of the current outdoor music facility will impact 0.24 acres of landscaped grounds.The project will result in the removal of one not}-native,ornamental tree. However,two new trees will be planted in the vicinity of the stage area.. Impacts resulting from implementation of the Outdoor Music Area project are not considered significant. Program level InWovements Loan-Intensity Recreation Area Development of the Low-Intensity Recreation Area will result in irmp"-W-I conyersigg of 11.4 acres of non-native grassland. A minirnum of 4 fl acresof pon-native grassland within this element of the ampmed MaElket Plan AN be rreainULbi d and enlhaamd to gLc yAt c form-ing habitat for state and Ngckrallyd ed Whi i t orn 11 4 acr of 000- Dative grassland Lhat are curmn*used on-an)sit fi-m bash for dam golfs parking,,atnd ass a source of fig(natedal fcwsand ba recrea facilit' not confl' with a ted goals [tf of HuntingM JearGeneral KnL The gaMtcWgn of 11A acres at n atisre would not resui�in the"take"ofranv state or federa�yfis# endangeered speceo%or teir habi t Lat a imW IQ tm cdfic& under-lhe fgderA or State EndangereA becimsAct. I n a# 's ro level e n th M er Plan in ' l develmpmgnt of an existing distrurtsed g_rea of the Park and wrouW not be ex g, ed to interfere with the of any reeKW t or rnigmt_,_gy fish cur mdldlife s�ec'�or sub��nti�lly d'amito�h habitat Huntington Centraf Parts blaster Plan of Recreation Uses Final Master Environmental Impact Report June 22, 1999 Page 3-7-44 w.IPRoJECTsrt l og"o4iEiR4cNR4 io96-oo4.si 3 Item 15. - 143_ HB-slo-=-,FR for fiRIL wildlife of C2MLegrsim of 11 4 acres- f nownative SmWand,IQ twf fmr low-intensfty recrea tan wgwI4 not canstitute a sivnificant impact on plant or 3Ni3dPift m9ources, in tpachto-the- J and forag �r repters present at the Pat j i Huntftton Central Park Master Plan of Recreatkt n Uses final Master Frsviroamental Impact Report June 22, 1999 Page 3.7-44 W:1PROJECT517096-004VIRICNR1709 -004.S73 n LTDB —51 t—ts= H .' t� Item 15.,- 144 ( 1 � •ate. e Midden ArealUrban ForesftYrailhead This element is projected to impaoa teW oF 43.2 convert up to t 7-2 acres of non-native grassland. se there are two weftd weat vAich support wetland this non-native giassittrid areer, A• ! f Non-native grassland habitat provides important foraging habitat for three sensitive species of wildlife: tri-color blackbirds,American peregrine falcon,and Swainson's hawk_Tricolor black birds nest in the cattails of Huntington Lake and forage in the non-native grassland areas of the project site. The American peregrine falcon forages over open areas for small ground dwelling mammals,such as the . California ground squirrel. The non-native grassland area has the largest population of California ground squirrels in Huntington Central bark. Swairison's hawk forages either on small mammals or large insects depending on the season. Both Swainson's hawk and American peregrine falcon require open grassy areas for foraging. Both of these species are known to occur at Huntington Central Park.. A train of comes gLf non-tta ' ve�itts` is men of the a PI will he maintainers and enhanced to proviiclg foraging habitat-for state atttd rally designated sE s" lilt inclttd' The c ,gflXgrgjpn gf 17.2 agM of native lad oc led within a partially abandoned a 1 f3 field slut is eject to annual mM40Sffl'escing for fire control to Provide conservation of a ktiotrvn aarebistsic Csridden area/urban forest!and tmilhead does not catu#lict wi1b adorned ggals gf.fte Cites of Huntiugtiin Beach Gey ffal Plan The conversion of 17 2 acres of wouk tot result in the "take of any state gr federaft listed andangeted WCdc&or their habitat that bas been determined to be alficid wn—d&r the Eedleml Scat Emhng S=ies A gL Thedcdgnatfon of the 2fr tt acm 1�2 be used for r asemflon and eraltartcement anon-motive grasslara�yy t atte t to include all uret#ed aromas tji1t$seas clue $ ntial to be subLeqfe jur6diction of ArM.CM ct i rs a e tifo ni ii t of S5h arAd GaM ImAesneritationof this prWOrn element of fie OmRg&ed Master Pian results in lmdWdevelopyttent of an of the Park and a a%M not be expected to Lnterfere with The rnp=UgA of mW resi o ra or mdW&species-or substantially dirninj h- ha6'ta for fi5b, w9cl Life or OWN. Qffiversion of 17.2 acres-of egngbnd urban fairest arnd trailhead faciliities told not constitute a significant irrtpa�t on aslant or wildlife resources. Semi-Active Recreation Area This element is projected to impact a total of gG$r$acres of non-native grassland. There are six sensitive plaint species which have potential to occur in this non-native grassland, and may potentially be impacted by implementation of this project element. toss of this grassland would constitute a significant impact to habitat for these species if they were determined to be present within the Park. Non-native grassland Habitat provides important foraging habitat for three sensitive species of wildlife- tri-color blatdcbirds,American peregrine falcon,and Swainson's hawk-Trr-color black birds nest in the cattails of Huntington Lake and forage in the non-natfve grassland areas of the project site. The American peregrine falcon forages over open areas for small ground dwelling mammals, such as the California ground squirrel. The non-native grassland area has the largest population of California Huntington Central Park Master Plan of Recreation Uses Final Master Environmental Impact Report June 22, !999 Page 3.7-45 W_1PROJEC7511©9b-W41EhR1CNW 7096-W4_5I3 Item 15. - 145-- ,-s�n,� tz HB -5122- Ft,,�v,..r.- ground squirrels in Huntington Central Park. Swainson's hawk forages either on small mammals or large insects depending on the season. Both Swainson's hawk and American peregrine falcon require open-grassy areas for foraging. Both of these species are known to occur at Huntington Central Park. Loss of this habitat would constitute a significant impact to foraging habitat for these sensitive species, Su(Ty Wier Cake Group Facifity The Sully Miller Lake Group Facility will be designed to avoid impacts to disturbed riparian habitat surrounding the Lake_ Impacts,resulting frorn implementation of this element of the Master Plan would not be considered significant in the absence of impacts to disturbed riparian habitat_ If Sully Miller Lake Group Facility designs which avoid impacts to disturbed riparian habitat are not considered feasible,significant impacts would most likely result from implementation of this element of the Master Plan. Implementation of the Sully Miller Lake Group Facility element could potentially i Huntington Central Park Master Plan of Recreation Uses final Master Environmental Impact Report June 22, 1999 Page 3.7-45 W.IPROJECTS1 i 096-Go41EtRICNRt 1096-004.5 73 p 'rC-s lZ'r A Y,. l'a.. HB -513 4 3 t t Item 1.5. - 146 result in impacts to 11.7 acres of disturbed riparian habitat. The existing 5.8 acres of ruderallb, m halcirtat would hc enfia tl to support Horn-native P.Wlartd habitat similar to that which is present kvi#hgp She["aefc weft of Golden West Street, Two sensitive species which may occur in this habitat are least Be]Vs vireo(federally-and state-listed as endangered)and southwestern willow flycatcher(state listed as endangered). Both species have been recorded from Huntington Central Park. The southwestern willow flycatcher may have bred in the past at Huntington Central Park(Gallagher 1997). Because Sully Miller Lake is currently closed to the public, it represents the least disturbed habitat within the Park,and therefore has the greatest potential for supporting these listed species. Potential ! sensitive species which may occur at Sully-Miller Lake may include:common loon, double-crested cormorant,western feast bittern, white faced ibis, northern harrier, osprey, long-billed curlew, and yellow-billed cuckoo_ Cooper's hawk and yellow warbler may also utilize this habitat when present at Huntington Central Park. Furthermore,Sully,Miller Lake is listed on the Nationa€Wetland Inventory Map(1974), and may be subject to U-S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) federal jurisdiction as a wetland. Any potential impacts to jurisdictional wetlands would be considered significant and require mitigation. PolkelCiviffan Gun Range Implementation of this program level element of the plan would potentially result in impacts to 4.8 acres of existing developed property, No significant impacts are expected to result from implementation of this element of the plan. 3.7.4 Mitigations Measures Construction of the'Sports Complex adjacent to Sully Miller Lake,and the Park,Tree and Landscape Maintenance Yard Expansion and Consolidated Camping Area adjacent to Talbert take--Meadow could potentially result in significant impacts to sensitive bird species potentially occurring in riparian vegetation. Implementation of the Park, Tree and Landscape Maintenance Yard Expansion and Consolidated Camping Area eiements could potentially result in significant impacts to riparian habitat adjacent to these planned improvements. Program level improvements planned for the non-native grasslands within the Park could result in a significant loss of foraging habitat for raptors at the Park, Lastly, the development of areas surrounding Sully Miller Lake could potentially result in significant impacts to riparian habitat,which is potential habitat for the feast Bell's vireo and southwestern willow flycatcher. Measure Biological Resources 1 - Directed surveys for least Bell's vireo and southwestern willow flycatcher will be conducted prior to commencing any construction activities near disturbed riparian habitats, 'erected surveys for least Bell's vireo andso�athtr►'eePn willow ycatcher wi�be —tW-i!). ccun as Gg Huth Ilse Fists and Wildlife Seryice ar_d Cal'efomua 13�e rtMcn of fish and GgM peaiafished RMIMls for meth sunven at the OW such surveys are unde-rtakean,if the presence of either species is confirmed, construction and design plans will be modified to avoid impacts to these species. Huntington Central Park Master Plan of Recreaom uses Final Master Enriroranental impact Report lane 22, 1999 Page 3J-46 W.WROJEC7314 096-0041EIRICNRI t o-6-0U4.513 Item 15. - 147- .-, T_ ,�, HB -s Nfidden Area/Vrban ForesttTrailhead Forty-five(4%acres of the remaining undeveloped 136 acres have been designated for preservation of the Native American midden archaeological area; a citizen-participation urban forest planting program; in addition to a trailhead, viewpoint and multi-use recreation traits for equestrian, pedestrian, and non-motorized cyclist. The site identified for this element of the proposed Master Plan consists of a'L-shaped" parcel located south of the existing Dog Park and Equestrian Center, west of Golden Vilest Street, north of Ellis Avenue,and east of Edwards Street. Project elements and construction activity would be determined when this feature moved forward as a capital inpxoverrient project. General elements/activities might include mobilization, grading and drainage, electrical, asphaltic concrete and concrete placement, structure assembly to provide shade overheads, a restroom at trailhead, complete automatic irrigation system, site furniture, and installation of plant material. At least twuenty our(2R)acres of cite % #frtg rsan-eaa#iive�lEarrsd wouI be#ttaitrta ned and enhanced to conserve seritablie fnragi�ng habitat forbirds. SewMc Live Recreation Area Ten (10) acres of the remaining undeveloped 136 acres have been designated for the City's therapeutic riding school facilities,an open turf field for recreation tfiatwiIt aiso provide for overflow parking during special events at the existing equestrian center,and as the proposed alternative site for an aquaticlswim center. This element of the proposed Master Plan is located on a roughly square parcel (aka.as the Marion property)immediately northwest of the intersection of Ellis Avenue and Golden-West Street. Project elements and construction activity would be determined when this feature rrnov6d forward as a capital improvement projectt. General elements/activities might include - mobilization,grading and drainage,electrical,asphaltic concrete and concrete placement,minor and -- . . major structure assembly,complete automatic irrigation system,site.furniture,and installation of plant material. __..._. S+ullrMilter Cadre Group facility Twenty(20)-acres of the remaining undeveloped 136 acres have been designated for a group picnic and fishing fadlity_This element of the proposed Master Plan consists of a roughly rectangular parcel that surrounds and includes the existing Sully Miller lake,located north of Ellis Avenue and east of the existing Ocean View Mobile Homes. The analysis in this Master EIR is based on plans that currently include one or two docks,restrooms/tackle and bait shop, a volleyball area,an open turf area,and shade overheads. Project elements and construction activity would be determined when this feature moved forward as a capital improvement project. General eiementslactivities might include mobilization, major grading and earthwork operations, drainage struchres, electrical, asphaltic concrete and concrete placement,minor structure assembly,complete automatic irrigation system,site furniture, and 'installation of plant material. PoCrcela rilfan GEM Range The seven and one-half(7.5)acres gun range was operated by the Police Officer's Association from the late 1960s to January 4, 1997 wken the City Council terminated the year-to-year tenancy lease. Part Huntington Central Park Master Plan of Recreation Uses Final Master EnviroarneriW Impact Report June 22, 1999 Page 2-16- W:IPROJfCT511096-0041EIRSCNR41096-004.513 HB -sls- F`, Item 15. - 148 No y .2 UPS PT too TOR; I-Wl "Way I -.y�, '4�.--". k- �: - M. '. , Imes 45645—A _W.,qq"gqW- ONg. —mm"MUMM, Fps you M im f M RAM A-A �g; .fy,,. __ rN e;.ql g th 1 Pam -l'If��-.,��-l!�'-'.-',.-,,,'.'-�-�,�'.�.-..*,-!', , .1 pj WX1, Me Y Rig jlg� own a eg PIG,RIN ............ xt ace on v M! ATIVO two WAR P" f6 yq-* mot S jv, Nin 4", g:._ v S11 .......... Rome-M 015 "Vttt V Wm �P_ Z K,A�.,.,r:-,,,, 10 09 fA E.""'PIMI.V, 7" N 5A p.............. AS_ ',PN�v7.7 ," ' a -- ----------- r � ��� i f • l A; f f f � f � ..... . IM1•�:.� {r T f � h, ? 3 i+Frt � r h 4-: t �' :, � a� ,- 4r ''� 11 r} tin �'� r J �Sr� � �yx r r`r� n lrt{S:..f !ra(tr °fR t .I - flP s` •K iy i. tv� S�}7i!n tot s lr� A�i ..,5 ty�_; ( � ra [; r,r� ! � 9 �`I �•s'+ K r k�'Y�`i�.dr� S .,:nr .;: c .,l.,i , ,. i ::.: .:: ... ;;: T,•!(�T++�},tsgw ar, 4 kH lK-y�i�) § ek s s*i,r?_�' f �s ¢!%p.,.. s�`FYsi �.. :,x ,, ;n,it�'�-1•++s�s.?;r.�,tr r�T+?Rt15av Y+.rA,rx x Hall,:a+z'�'�r.. �`�: _ i `fFr�t'�sz 1,• �, `va 3, -;f" ,T.Ml{ar-�'rw,• F i�;ruew r{ Y+�, •;tRr` .1,a hs.. bf:ss^§ �P'I +"`r: °� r a r .e^. c5.- .t, Xr" �,.d `asr ;S�t '`�n: .�r f ,9:. _ T:. ,!., '. . '' '"`r ram. nz+' �[,� " '��d7r �:f ! aadd5 Jrt. �'x. i-. _: r t.r 1 -•f 1�>•">'�.�+r ,.': � ",? � ',� :p` M. '{t?" a :'a1tiv�) .."`'�}� ?'9t"r�•e 'wt,°s�lre•r ,." '��''�1J �, .s ., f.P'+s ,R t:'.r t *.. A;.�r'49,yf "'rtil�j •i + b.- s,r�•Sh ,x'�5 ti:'. ha � � �� 1.,, g a� s y 3� 1 �.q N 7f :. f•: ya��,�� jta ... ,e 3 V !l r Nl:w& d"h 5 crtr .w4.:ir+l a. .cii.#tx i�- '+�, ESI s ::".r1h;E'.•s ._ y;,i; �yf .0 ;� 4Y � 4 t C�N. .a4 s 3.4.,5 ty v� � s' �- - � Jk ar4:tr�j� ,lf,�y'r1i!- j� a•y 7( �� ;y�rc4�y� -,�-, `ir P�'1•' ar �3` r rq A §�i: •r W2:1. '! +i , "S.'' '.11 4�� '4 S :5%�:E _ } k I;. _ { { �( q. :'N�fit{ .5,,,e. at• 5 .�. 'PDX tlf N. � r� '.'a¢ Rf'_. r -'4t .R •{ "l�� _-MM" V n- .�'' #�d� G:t- �j a,! ��y,y� 4-. ti k Will �(jF S .fJ;i'YL,i 1.'�t.M.t lA5'(:,�T.f 0'r C=I''gl- �rs.[��. T$y�! � - 4�" �#r i n.7''. ,:a$ i" I i,.,..s. --l r r -�T.. ,,`(3. -"9 �:,ix"�i•.F -ql+•��r�, : �i�4r`'rl P s, ..1°� :5��q�i.� $h +,..•,., W. +�^�:s is tt t. .;{sty- cr � y- 'su�Wy A r+ .>:[.'u'•' t�a'4`t�. ,"1:4 � .,:jl '�;.•�ir s3; trt 1`w.l„1;. �•[,� t Sfj,.T.,1 .r� )?IG`f�.-'r^V �T';; ,7s 9::. (fv S ji': t 4 'ry- 1, � 1 IY(•�, �i _>.� J�4, � � yf�'A:p- ��e,�. `�ee�y�, -''1 '� �' 2 .-: 1y5•�"}siW� � .._C, rr r Il �.,. ''.i ::�k �.:1r°cr t'}�,1.- f.1,r r` �i����i�s4�"P�st`^t�a- r5x, xrr �-;i i � r.., , .{¢ t :.4i y Y J4 �C 3 r}k•11'Yt I C � � fs ( V✓�I IxUe t� : y .. ; t h,'"' �; I ai•5 � 'n s! t 3 s },>s Ty s.'14 A'�fit } N ? ! ( +R.t I d+. Y jit -.? :kti ai YVC A r (r '. t{ �' 'k,..'}�rl s �';r J 5 ,1:T• r t ' } - I tyy.;, :rl§+ - 1(- u� :: r ' _ ,J. :tn;q" !'t .f !. �;�I tllrr h 3f {'.•s:f� ,<i if F : 5j[�5ygp�� r W."!{y, :,[j�,� _7+.�.r `i1ryr r :.• y�,yy�,?. : I ,2&� M { tr: #� N ;: a f. 4 r ,rx ay sS "i; �( M� eft >t9 ,1 Aa s x GS If"14 �i lY1..� h A e rJ5 � ,.r�r J I�k l tat .f'rl t�A r ;' "�'��d-� �k�, �'� �rE ,r,�t " I;,, y ,r L �,�,J�k�3:`• ;y��",��nrr � i %!� ,+i. (u; ,5 f�1 rl: .t r 17(:._J.. ,r.�,,;} ( �?•' sY �!�:����+�I�!�Ca� ����"�k .4;�1 r r�.rltdr�''0�ra j - �,".,.f 1�;Y..S a. � 1. I�s , s r�r. i " yRt �1 t(.T tsR� rgt•�:.[n Il:;FOR' l..�i rn I ,i , t.F �.�c�i3i pp �• -,T "7v$J= ; r r.E ;A a ` t: a i„; :.;' t Y{ •r I z.afi � :.} Y ,� .,,° J` .1 l', k+ r i t 8 ( l4 iitit -.; �Iaat r } 4.1 ..,i C, _ f,. Ii if ' i 5 nl r ''€ � i J ,.s..,111-I r�'- ,1,�d{7�i�' � -"�-.S .s�"�f:yf � ��Y ,. 4 .trr• 5 Ji ��}+��5:�Y, �+ t t I �y 'Y rrj 1.3'3[ t�'.{.xr $!k'i Y� ,pr try y, rE rYr-.g 51 „�.� r t,ro s7'n, J ! :}:: w!:S�C ti �,-i i.�.,r•,fi� -,r � �� !.e�.?r:?i r !i ,v- {5. I,;"'F.yt�b'' �. t $ ., �'', tY,.,;3r.,,n_.,.. .'..6.r�..J...Ap�,�j'.{rr; ,.: � lj t �r :...:.; .� ':r';,�Ss,F'7t.. -• .fi:-� ",v.��i-r, trj .�«�. ..r:��i f. �,.rrq- tssf-,`: �i�y . ,� _ � I _ f.�'�'t}. .rd, ' I Ir` `¢ a q14 % �l:7 f >f -.r 'fit :..1 i. f (`r. dN� riS•° h"A'h_i ak kt i r„' 1 t i r 141 .+%,s ii4;. Jit'a`' Yr"s" - 7 n .�r '� f rr';f: r Lfiys:§1'>!.".r!s.+S�4'k�.r y °%�,:,'Jti'`Jx� rAy.;. i fN J' 14'%m rig• k,✓Y:.0 o. r :t� F 11'�4' ,.r jar ^a}, v3'.` I .-;i.E;,� r.m..4.t -.5 J air ' t '`,, i �r ,>,yr' rcr �' 't•! .1. : ";-ri,t:�.,:rr x rr� 'i t3�.94 � t .../ m-'jam 'Jr. ,ta.,a iT �;. 3c ,�L ,. 4 �h� 33„[•r. �% 1•. Y �1.'. f ?fh '' Yt a u- ' ,,,I,. in trdwr: � n 1�,• s�rl fi >a'' -;•'k,wy. 6TS. if` 'f' •'rolxl ,�' ��..� ., > .0 - " r... : aA�-Y..•`ij f' :i�'y-,.;1 t s a -w x,2 ,.:.;. _, F,r,., .. "r#..�#'N 1. �". 4,Z,.a¢„�ksr - i h 9.�. TavF }YM 3rIT, gp WA'�Y� 'x#�y :.,{' q ..} .�f� +k d "�`:ih'S41iS'�• r,t"�¢ {, E ,�+�.. r�xg` t�.'I��r�rgfi >+�.5� :r rr^' §v "� ?}l la' ie>rra , �s,I �y�_ + µ 'ts �n`�r '?.-� +s z"� -.,,yl rF rl�•.h�3 ° {� J k:. J:t iti`'{`I� � rt- i : � ;s�e 't '-s r .' fr�l(l b�i 1�',.,n:; .r 1• i:, };.-� e a J �,��C'irwi,r,++t. r.7 t I �- I Sri i.{.Fi`y�,�l+�r'2� :����r. 'Y �C*T�".1 4 _ k� y.'fS', „!.�.,.,Y➢�" �y r Y A� �'�.C 4I�+.k'e r "5'i r hFm! '1�' x E� CD viEIR 99-1 Identifies Errors in Fi 3-9 of EIR 07-002. [I,U.S GE F%;S1J11.R1AIrt[ETL1Ek:c Incorrect descriptions 1zrhFavY7rJ aat[u2Y5�vF Aavrcr.:of wuv sOutst • , from FMEIR 99-1 Slater. ve ' �+� �. R 11nNO5CnPF I A:E,1Y Yhll a•F.;;U:)E a I tl � � • °.Nltnt+CFJi f .:C C�FrQ�'� r�FM1- �MP[fJv2ASJJiSIJ•Ib GON'�6l�DAi'fJN � l �V FMEIR 99-1 specifies a i I � z n 0 osed Scnior•t enter . IUITT natural park rN � L tl0 trlslwo E ssv++vow I r:aKrtlrF Llrc^It'1'NP.EUiL � l� /,'AtPH7vlfhfYS �•`J CENTER i f without development rea intensity designated as p . � •'.I I J MJStC A:� ARVTJ•IIVCE 1 Saw intensity with picnic except for 2.9 acres for facilities,restrooms,tat-lot and YJU7N parking. Inclusion of a.senlor a„ a Pzs, to EItaEE Equestrian Center ' ( t center on the southern portion of ,r 'i + , 1 nnenAY 1���1 i�me thisarea:ould.requlr.e:a land 'overflow parking p g : . . X :use:d Sig N ri�tlbrlcfian:�tl'fi �►: ldblUl�lgl1'si�y�� .w" Incorrect Equestrian Center boundaries = :.. + l ;¢. sposcF�MviEit; 1 fv� '�l '{ incorrect facilities description C.l1 - IIv�rnlfast,rl✓`Gr t ��t<�cx7tl l� 1Y� 1111N t•Rr.1voEc:,Ir,v x Trailhead planned on top of CDFG stream ,a Mislabeiing of Semi-active fr• "" irtf �`-a Recreation location 's +�Q ;,;t- Private property rights ignored r 4Swi3141h1•F LENIEA , ='q. Petroleum leases Encyclopedia lots F " � - Wft •--.." i 11RN'Tq.Y'Qt�^3T , ✓4 r yy:' �x�r Nivx `'�, Improper reference date ; for figure application � tF:� : MAK Elli5 Ave E xtira+Aw � ' Not the subject of FSEII=t 07-002 pAqq I°�""trTFI)Fs n pP AAAIUU,1 HL WE eb sPEi;IFS ' iAGIIIY INC[UbP.S:11IAA9.SytF�(e,IYNd'' FAGlllfr,t•I01114.1:.n^.'S!Ap/.�• T�v:fl:Ibi:.:C�ESF NQAfI fibM ElltS thSlF5.H11'cMt.Y,. Y,,GIK4.P,1.CtIV,147b PAOM P.IU!S A•/ bE f!!E-V'v'll[,'C �1 hV[hlul,�1[SIR:uYPUNiw M'Eac iHFI��FE Not authorized to FMEIR 99-1 YRFRA Rr INGCSM7FA.0fM1VA hNp -lCr+v3CK5+IG".M"iNi11, iur t 175hY1Ut16F.gg:A SR'.]A[{OS'EI! f5'1y11O4.'Y q1 RFjFtO• `fOtl['!AAU UrI,;l!SD lflix A,ROt1A eL1LK,iG,tA25 FJG[�� f'�F .YO�1 1 0+'_ll4 RM ,,�PEE�! E��/�,�Ct���y��' Different figure on Y AAIb :tGHf PeC.r,l G Pto osed Therapeutic I[PiFms,x.!d=wJutt Community Services website '" `"• Riding „,�iuv�•Vd��!::""'e` ul��sl Requires Charter Section 612 vote x, t rT t o i}- 'I v r 1 i w 1 :, kS+ 1 r t / a L t F'xs !r•I x la> f _ J i �l Z r 1 t• p : d`n t t S - ,uJ.,All �r ys 5�flAiYF# r rf FL{�1 "`�fl ' rrl+ Jfq kr•1 Lt f� .. l I i�� J���' 7L1, t�p.f'�z lr � � rutsT'�•r' i. yx. a � - � , ?: � tJl i p. r s�s,, t yr;� . r J # �; L Vx-�1` �: a� r lh"4 _s �'�F td a 1 � tl t S t a✓# t Y .,� as$� S . } rti f• 'Fi Y(M9 , �jF4 p t^`Ty;t,7 `hl _-, 1 Y�tlt ; ,(� fM' RK .��' s �` �r�s. 1�.: 4 S§ •,+ -,, . lus?f?�`°'`f �1JuQ �., . rt, j� p YJ "?,,2. r .xb" ITt1 � j %i�` ' i:` fX t.d''X .��-?.dr 4 �T -.. 3 dry.S-TaN_k�`J'y',::r t !t� I r 7 ,:d.,.- ' ' ` :� o-rG^� o v tI a4 R,.sn. 3' x�: uar?nH .. :, t7``[xX. a ;II-�31",�p. „ :ie r,l_- �. ° ,� ri 1}.�'(�r,�' 1r t +k�7.aUf k�r{a oil L a� d r J rid-:'!! •1�:;:�7'i r r , r J j':t[fs ar + : � -. ..$r r �'T,,,: 3r r s���..: �' � Lt f ,. {f r t t, .: r n t r t y tit. t# .. ;sue � i t a,aa• l!-' I+�'�',�a F� F }:: L'i- ✓ 5b $�x.t:�„J.L �. _ �� _.;5 I -&h tS,t .}v � i -,t �--�>5�+ t•s � �.�+.yr��F. z 7�.. t�r �r s:�Tq�'{+ 3 _ r:. F .e<+, (; q'.d �_ 'N`�l ' ut �f i �,S ,r� � y�I, y 1 srfY• 1r �� 8{. 41 �t ,�i:. #r*fi��xSS �vs�g ;.i rt � �+f J c 7 .av Cf t� J: �,� �•5��`'Y � 4 'o � - ,rrFA�',�x°. �^ ` :<�f -nn -'_ t -YF "r_ �'�= J vq: :. _ 3t� '� � �(itt'� �,r. -J. � u,k.{.? t n �.r j a. - t ��n Stj r .I t , 'G / { i:�w h+�� n t t F `:•� r.tX^51r1f� - f h i,1rr L r0���ir s:'. .-I I T ;2�}S all i# tt.. aJ ( -,•1t �'lt Sy L� � S ° $e I ,`sE'.� .'dt. r t}� �i'�hS'ex :K:r't .t'+uf'oi,}.. � ,.t' li�� • 4 J-4. -.z S-p It it -r d� r r u h TL N €..t, t "`,. ^ryy9f, t- l:'.- 7 - } 'h�3�`;. �R }, t^ '� rt ro ,ar� tsuas' sur .:s;J , r �l%. k ,.1 .:;.„ -,i'i.6 .y{ h'u✓..., 5"..: ... ;t4H} r'mti+'ii. 11.l.` �1ti r°` �: r rf e 3 - ""sir Lp� rs+2�J t,+ tktb _ Irr. t t� � !'�•. I'1 F�� �. e., f's 'm�� 1 _: rt. .., �k. i1j r . 0- i.{ ✓�t`F x, P {{ pr'� k u M1 i •�r( i� �,?' s d i : sw r S r - 1 .4 §r 1 ....r J e zr+,4 .�' ! �y+rg �+y� 1 � its }+ t t o, n + € It0li r�:� a i. �i tY l�;`} r 't54xti: i ' �?r�*s 4 �r� tit r �t4�:� tr *^ 'wt• � _ i= dF, -3,. r t t j r' *r f t pry �h`�^]�t �� + } `a^.•„-:�t s s t s, �die v t k "�``� t y �{ •, r -:i I 'rr st r§(A,r`h ?y.4'`m t Fit,.. I t .: t 1 f4M t:. �4 'ti �,"" T'_ +Fti ..;xy p xK„�d'a.� .[[' J ; Ll /�{r hu y��+y �C F.f..Fo[ O�J 1���1,'e�..7 r�rfiN`'+h+ # e ' ,-a �'` r t.,tt,.'., r:. t. S> . "� ¢ r s t•t t I::?s t .s # �9 r'f'x,• t i'F a i . `sy"�;.#. .r f �u , - r it 4��a,�y ,, ', 'r` �:f E ; t.,F- 7 �_ cr�L k''s�u xt �c��'''�c -�� +t•i1C I gbvq I r \ r.74.*t ){j1 f.i E41 is'. $_�'` .ai1".. •s+�a; ' rS,:i'.; 7 t,., t -'.r�kk S t`vj�,! y( y�tV.—{§}::'�>t• ,:Y©�� w:_� .y�'�r16,.t�k�p,�1�14, t '.d'�'r Ih�:: `.t .J:, r t t SE�.� � ;y;� .,�er k n. 'nisi ,,, �r� {i •� j. ::.ri.'. �} _ _t..:. �. -,. N,.. .> ^,G,� h"+>'rt~ -ksky ra'J ���IMr t:'iJlx t���a r � .'.�,.,r rC �'"'✓y�. : .k*.�, s-,•'S. u„�ry�, ta&..r. 7� r�,��ktx: F-. ' .(txLY4°,y i'i d^7 ..,5}ti<'����� � .,,d r�;.�.y���.i- t ;,,yr,;ln�+�.'. F a J ,(ozF9 #T t i4+.t;;:•.a�:rf J..;,.s 'F=y,�+'3'K' Ng. g 7 u::> J Y"a.a ra'f" +C'r�'"f• arr"a+rt rw a,.:rt I� I �� 5x� r r :trim `yi'x 's"-Ls - '��2 1 ly - !t 1 + �,1 C+t' +P : t e :'tr S a�L.>... t*�j r•` 'x -S i It 9� s Ar k, :#.:.�9 y.PC $r4 i9 fl Y ,." �' rt l.."S :i•• t 'hn} 3 `u. �P r t � �.. � ATTACHMENT #9 F CI_AREM0NT LAND GROUP Attorneys Mark C.Allen III 250 West First Street,Suite 330 rzrallen @a ate montl•.andGroap.com Claremont,CA 91ni (909)354-8825 Fax (909)398-1683 FILE NO.: CLG.008 January 23, 2012 VIA EMAIL QNL Y !l JVillasenor@surfcity-hb.org I Jennifer Villasenor Senior Fire Planning and Building Dept. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Re: Huntington Beach Senior Center Project RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Dear Ms.Villasenor: We have reviewed the comments and the response to comments in the SEIR We believe that the comments by rather parties have considerable merit and we incorporated those comments into our own. Unfortunately, we do not believe that any of the response to comments was adequate. It appears that the only process available to us to address the deficiencies in the response to comments is at the oral testimony at the Planning Commission Meeting. Given the severe time limit placed on us by the City,we will do best to summarize these difficulties at errors with the responses in a way that will be useful to the Commission. i As always,thank you for your courtesy and professionalism in handling matters. Very truly yours, CLAREMONT LAND GROUP MARK C. ALLEN III �I 1 MCA:mr 1 I l:1ENVIR0IVICLG.008(ParksLega]DeF)k=esplCiryVillasenor0l-Comments(1-23-12).doc j1-113 -521- Item 15. - 154 CLAREMC7NT LAND C3P,0UP Attorneys Mark C.Allen III 250 West First Street,Suite 330 mallen 1bCh=ontUndGroup.com Claremont, CA 91711 (909) 354-8825 Fax (909)398-1883 MLE No.: CLo.08 1 January 24, 2012 I VIA EAL4IL ONLY JVillasenorgsurfcity-hb.or Jennifer Villasenor Senior Fire Planning and Building Dept CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 Main Street } Huntington Beach, CA 92648 # Re: Huntington Beach Senior Center Project RESPONSE TO COMMENTS i Dear Ms. Villasenor: In accordance with requests, I have put together an organized summary of the issues in this matter with the responses to comments in the FSEIR. I have tried to make this as short as possible. Please forward this to the members of the Commission. The areas of concern are organized by category. Almost all of the responses to comments are inappropriate because they misunderstand the status of the FSEIR assuming—wrongly—that it can "build on"the prior review. It can't. The approval of the 2007 EIR was voided. Nothing is left of that analysis from a legal point of view. We turn now to the areas of concern: 1. Misunderstanding of the Court's Ruling. a. The Court did not rule"in favor of City" in the sense that the Court agreed with the City's substantive arguments. The ruling was that the City violated CEQA, its Charter and the Quimby Act but that the plaintiffs did not raise the Charter and Quimby Act issues during the approval of the Pacific City Project. However,those issues can be raised now outside the context of the Pacific City Project. b. The Court did not decide that the City could"use Quimby Act funds". The Court simply said that the objection to the use of the funds had to have been made at the time the Pacific City Proj ect was approved. If there is any change to the Pacific City Project(and there will be),the issue will need to be reassessed. c. Not one judge—of the four that reviewed the City's action--thought the City I complied with CEQA in any regard. j i 'LG.DQ8(ParksL.egalDeo\corresplCityVillwenor43-Cor---l-t'-')^-12).doc Item 15. - 155 HB -522- f Jennifer Villasenor Re: Huntington Beach Senior Center Project January 24, 2012 Page 2 i d. Contrary to the Response to Comments,the Quimby Act provides for a set aside of open space at a fixed ratio to the size of a residential subdivision—it does not create a slush fund. Perforce, a use of Quimby Act funds that reduces open space is improper. Every judge who looked at this agrees. Moreover, this approach(which I was used in the original EIR),badly understates the impact of the use of such funds. j Not only is the open space that was supposed to be provided lost, the space taken by the Senior Center is also lost. The trial judge agreed that this was improper and that ruling was affirmed on appeal. 2. The City voided its prior approval. That approval cannot be used to justify this FSEIR irrespective of the outcome of the prior case. This leads to multiple errors. a. The FSEIR relies on outdated data. Information from 2005 is used to fix the alternatives without any consideration of other things that have changed,or analysis as to whether the information in the 2006 report is even valid. b. The FSEIR frequently comments that nothing more needs to be done because the issue was not raised in the prior lawsuit or ordered to be reconsidered by the Court. II{` The City should be looking at providing a full and complete analysis,not seeking to . do the bare minimum. That,in itself, is a violation of CEQA. c. The FSEIR utterly fails to consider alternate designs based on the"fact"that the design was settled. d. The justification for the Senior Center is the need for senior services. Yet the "project"is defined as a building instead of the provision of services. The FSEIR fails to bridge the analytical gap showing how the giant building is needed to provide the services. 1 e. The drafters misunderstand the relationship between the uses of the Senior Center, its economic viability and its environmental impact. The Court has already rejected the argument that they are unrelated. f. The FSEIR assumes that out of date information can be used merely because it was used before. g. Scores of comments are rejected on the basis that the matter was previously considered. 3. The Notice and the EIR are misleading and fail to inform other public agencies and the public at large that the City is changing the General Plan. a. Persons requesting notice (such as PLD), were not given notice. b. We find no evidence that notice was given as required for a project of regional significance. III 1-113 .523_ Item 15. - 156 Jennifer Villasenor Re: Huntington Beach Senior Center Project January 24, 2012 Page 3 l 4_ The SEIR lumps all open space and parkland together. It does not take into account the unique and (alas)increasingly rare instances of passive open space. Since passive open space is not accounted for,the impact is never addressed and creates a misleading impression. For example, it appears to us that things like the Central Library and its parking lot are included in the"Open Space" calculations. 5. The Senior Center is not a"recreational facility" in any ordinary meaning of the term. The raison d'etre for the Center is to provide service for seniors most of which(e.g., nutrition, care, counseling) are not recreation. Thus,the multiple rationales and responses that rely on the Senior Center being a"recreational facility" fail. 6. The voters have not approved the current project as required by the City Charter. 7. The 1~SEIR fails to address the inconsistency between the economic projections that require a high use of the facility for things like weddings and the supposed limitations on use, such as the alcohol ban and supposed ban on loud music. j 8. The FSEIR ignores, rather than analyzes contrary information. Examples include 1 information on raptors, alternative sites, alternate approaches, and alternate designs. 9. The design was picked by Makar. It's a flat lie to deny that. Very truly yours, 1 CLAREMONT LAND GROUP f MARK C. ALLEN III MCA:mr cc: Client i i 1 Item 15. - 157 HB -524- PP. Robert Franklin PO Box 1171 Huntington Beach CA 92647 rfranklinn mail.com O PECEv1=D 714 475.8095 JAN 2.A 20�2 January 24, 2012 )ept.of Planning &Building Ms Jennifer Villasenor Senior Planner Department of Planning and Building 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Comments to Draft Subsequent EIR No 07-0021General Plan Amendment No 11- 0041Conditional Use Permit No 07-039R Dear Ms Vllasenor: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the.Draft Subsequent EIR for the proposed General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the proposed five (5) acre development project which includes a 45,000 sq. ft., 52 foot tail, single-story structure with 227 (plus 24 future) parking spaces (Development) in West Central Park.As long-time residents and as stated at the public meeting on October 12, 2011, our concem is the protection of passive open space in West Central Park and the impact of the proposed structure and proposed activities of the development project to surrounding properties. We have reviewed the response to comments and offer the following comments. The court determined that the environmental review for the prior approval process for the proposed facility was inadequate. In addition the court determined, quite rightly, that a comprehensive general plan amendment was needed to comply with local and State law. The court summary is included in the Draft EIR. Having been directly involved in the concept and planning of the Center at Founders Village Senior and Community Center in Fountain Valley, I am aware of the needs and the effort to establish community facilities. We have visited the existing Rogers Senior Center in Huntington Beach and although it has charm and has a cozy feel, it needs some attention. Redevelopment of the existing site or a new facility elsewhere is justified. If the existing senior facility is not redeveloped, we support the construction of a new community center with senior activities. HB -525- Item 15. - 158 Comments DSEIR No 07-W21GPA No 11-004/CUP No 07-039R PC Meeting January 24, 2012 Page 2 The question is where? Staff has divided entitlements into two (2) parts. The first action relates to the adequacy of the Draft EIR. The second action deals with the proposed GPA and CUP for the building and operation. Item B-2a Draft EIR The purpose of an EIR is to research and address potential impacts for proposed development. Simple. It is a disclosure document prepared for decision makers to assist in making informed land use decisions. Nothing binding. Mitigation measures can be converted into conditions of approval if deemed appropriate. Is the Draft EIR adequate? Does it address and bring forth pertinent and up to date information? We feel the answer is no. A consultant prepared a site location feasibility study but we question the findings. Reading the outdated and skewed report, one gets the feeling that only one site is feasible. We disagree. The proposed community center should be located adjacent to the library. Where is the comprehensive analysis on the impact of converting a large area of designated low intensity open space to high intensity uses? Inadequate. A basic inventory of uses. None. A summary of acreage of low medium and high intensity uses. None. Nor does the response to our comments to the Draft EIR deem such information necessary. Incredible. For such an important decision to convert 5 acres from Low to High Intensity use for what resembles a commercial use, much more detailed analysis is needed. Item B-2b GPA 11-004 As stated in our comment letter dated October 20, 2011, the central question for this effort is the proposed general plan amendment. State law requires agencies in California to prepare and abide by an adopted general plan. The general plan is the basis for all land use decisions and it is a very powerful document. The general plan is the guiding document for all land use decisions. Proposed revisions to the document should be seriously considered. You are the keepers of the work and vision of the land use decision makers in the 1960's and 1970's that maintained a high priority for setting aside open, passive parkland for future generations. It is our duty to protect and preserve this resource for future generations. Item 15. - 159 HB -526- Comments DSEIR No 07-002JGPA No 114)04/CUP No 07-039R PC Meeting January 24,2012 Page 3 What is the value of designated open space? A number of position papers and essays have been recently written in the urban planning literature that identify designated and protected passive open space as a dear commodity in areas transitioning from suburban to highly urbanized uses. Some authors go so far as to put forth that protected open space is the most valuable land use within the boundaries of an agency. Once gone how does an agency get it back if needed? As specific plans are adopted and developments are approved, the lots get smaller and park space shrinks. Think about the Edinger Corridor, the Downtown Specific Plan and the Beach Blvd. Corridor to name a few. Higher densities with less open space is the new nominal. What if the community center is not constructed at the proposed location? If the general plan amendment is approved, down the road another incompatible high intensity use could be proposed at a later date which may be even more detrimental to existing park uses. CUP 07-039R If one reviews the magnitude and sheer size of the proposed building, one wonders why? The building is 45,000 sq. ft., 52 feet tall, proposes to need 227 parking spaces and converts 5 acres to paved area. Monstrous is the term that comes to mind. We do not understand why the building as designed is so large. Unless the City has other plans. Our position is very clear. The proposed facility is not a senior center. It is a community center with senior activities. Plus the proposed stage and hours of operation until midnight on weekends resemble a nightclub. We feel the proposed building and the proposed late hours are not compatible with existing park uses nor surrounding residential properties. In spite of staffs recommendation, can the Planning Commission make findings of fact that the proposed building and hours of operation are compatible with all elements of the General Plan? Can the Planning Commission make findings that the proposed project will not be detrimental to persons using the adjacent passive park area or persons residing in the vicinity. Findings that the facility and operation as proposed will not be detrimental to property values in the vicinity of the project? We think not. xB -527- Item 15. - 160 Comments DSE[R No 07-0021GPA No 11-004/CUP No 07-039R PG Meeting January 24,2012 Page 4 In summary, we support the redevelopment of the existing senior center or construction of a new facility with senior activities. We feel the proposed location is wrong. We have reviewed the comment letters to the Draft EIR and many letters support a facility but recommend a different location. We feel a more appropriate location is on the east side of Golden West Street adjacent to the existing Library. Close proximity to the Library makes sense: cluster existing high intensity uses on the east side of Goldenwest Street: amply existing parking for the Library and senior activities; close proximity to Library uses for seniors and close proximity to existing infrastructure such as water and underground utilities which could reduce construction costs. We are residents on the outside trying to protect precious passive open space for future generations while supporting the concept for a new, updated facility for senior activities. We know we are up against City hall insiders using City funds to accomplish their desires. The proposed location is expedient to their plan. We question their wisdom. We remember the "Youth Sports Complex" that became the HB Sports Complex. During the planning process if one raised questions about compatibility or financing, you were perceived to be against youth programs. Rumor has it the Sports Complex is subsidized by taxpayers to the tune of around a million dollars a year. Do we want to go there again? Now we have a Senior Center" which is really a community center. If one questions the project, you are perceived as anti-senior. As seniors, we feel a different location is in the best interest of the City. And as residents, we will always question who pays for the construction costs and how will ongoing staff and programs be funded. As one of our older friends stated after listening to the facts about the project uput it across the street`. Thank you for your diligence. Please add our address to the list of notification of all meetings regarding this project. Should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Robert Franklin Item 15. - 161 HB -528- LAC (vim Comments on FSEIR 07-002 Based on FMEIR 99-1 BAR-2, pg 10-66, FSEIR 07-002: proposed to use FMEIR 99-1 grassland mitigation areas FMEIR 99-1 assigned all grasslands mitigation acreage in Project/Program areas in 1999 Before Senior Center construction MM 4.3-2 needs 5 acres: Purchase and enhance private property to provide new mitigation area 3.5 acres encyclopedia lots and small pump lease area 4.0 acres Brindle/Thomas lease Remove overflow parking for Equestrian Center (55 utility posts) 2.9 acres next to southeast corner of Center N Suggested corrections to MM 4.3-2 and pgs 4.3-22 and 4.3-23; identified errors in Table 3.7-3 CLG-20, pg10-57, FSEIR 07-002: proposed fig 3.9, pg 3-21 as Central Park land use plan Fig 3.9 (fig 1 .0-4, FMEIR 99-1) substantially out of date (1997-1998) and never corrected to reflect FMEIR 99-1 changes to Plan specified in 1999 Suggested corrections to figure 3.'9 and identified factually incorrect words on fig 3.9 Natural Park.ppt, 1/17/12 o� N CD to � Grass Area Required41 �2 Acres Non-Native w Midden Area/Urban Forest/Tra il head (26 acres) Semi-active Recreation Area ( 1.6 acres) Sully Miller Lake Group Area (5,8 Acres) Loam Intensity Recreation Area (7.8 Acres) (41.2 Acres) FMEIR 99-1 Mitigation Plan defines non-native grass and - -- Urban Forest area to replace w acres taken by ball fields. Final ,r result might look like the 1981 ` picture to the right, with - interspersed Urban Forest trees. This natural park area is heavily used by equestrians, bicyclists, Circa 1981 from EIR 81-5 hikers and other park goers. Natural Park.ppt. 1/17/12 Tr e 1 �s d4 z�y�' q� gg ,��� � r i� ;• �l�" v` r�j�t� �^' ' .R �y '��A!`� � k•§ o �.�F i � a�S A � i J3 i� �y v�.t ''1� z[�� 14 �` �h i ,*�iY�c�+, ,.�r7 r 'C m ^�i �a• i '3"r � �i� �+'�G� 'r:� s .Fr�+JF y� s AF. �e �`�tiv ,� 9 ,. i r6`d . - ( i ,r5q a.r v i• Y .i r "�tF �F t 9tM r ar iaa r� s5 az a 'Jp r h� � r6-„ °F 4Ti '" sr t r v *ir �3 �az2 r#" ret4sS t q �h a r x qt� �S 'a.•c r'm'1 1t n.p+'i E+S k. a s�#,v�# :,r�ly� 'rgg�g tC�'k'a'VzGFE {Y�. u¢� Yn ?Uy ,+ �IF i r r � 7'f # iN Zit '>< Fr� '�'£+v *��i r r r � • a I�� r 't 1�'�i�la rr�C � � �y t f � ' a f t � .z k, �y�� r,ra r UP ��" /,���. '. � ,"""4 � :. ' '�+ ,: is•,dY..__ � 4 � di ,y,� 4� � <rFf i� k�'y�� 9,s� x��� E+}�`j„�*SiS� 1 i Su MY. ler F. I «,. r 27s 6148 �.rl er7 t V rp6lritaYR i 'Group M r a Midcle ArealUrbar Fo�- st� °tl ��4 I' s Facilitx' ` ' 'r ;$ k " R erns active 'e��etron lti l a i� w: Af r h N 1 .,E$ 1 F rl iiiAAA111111 rJ' r A14: R hYFrj �1���� ,��:c ea :�Y ,�� a � ,ram 1 rt�aJ�•'j+*�r.+rh+Nw�� � v } +�ar> � ; �H� � tt�y r 4�r r i tt k r s ,;�, �x ��; � EI .A<� '� '[ p�.,t,t� ✓d�.?s��l Sa __kke� .�' J a'�,ynN l -, e w �� 1 3'ul kF Jti 'Po r ;� Y. r:�. ,+"' i Ali 7,:.?���,t .•s;t.e6`tcsi�"3r��, t 6,f���a t ! r>� r Yk`F� 'I'., a. CD Specifications from Table 33-3 Of FMEIR 99-1 Non-Native Developed Landscaped Lake Total Grassland Land plater FMEIR 99-1 Area Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Low-intensity 19.2 < :r Z. 0.0 11 .4 0.0 n_, M idden 26.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sem i-active* 8.0* 1.6 5. 1* 1 .9 0.0 corrected* 4.5* 1.6 2.9* 0.0 r� w �.' Sully Miller** 19.2 5.8 4.8** 8.6** 0.0 corrected** 19.2 5.§ 0.0** 2.4** 11 .0 41.2 acres non-native grassland required * Neglected to account for private/lease property in Midden Area: Encyclopedia lots +oil lease = 3.5 acres ** Neglected to account for Sully Miller Lake 11 acres water area: Retain '111.7 disturbed reparian areas C8+ vertical acres')" and delete "landscaped" area to support small birds: endangered, state-listed and sensitive Natural Park.ppt. 1/17/12 LIR rr• . + 1' Lake anks , �9ie ji B l , s r ✓r ai a s : "J 1 80-120 feet high Trees slide/fall MAIO "iZ into water I acres disturbed reparian? t WWI j Pr .:ns1" �� tE=k*�Y rr a t � fl r b PF i gg y p7q 1 V J qq '1 >r ,t �Jti app.�. }, Z�` : 7a ............ .. I VI „�' �V'�F , jx_ + ;?'.rt•v, �,�:,:.a�szX y7;: ! +.r xr�*�.:s.��3�f;. s"m �^ - �"':•c ._`r3:., v3 F.. ,-art .:.J y,C�. � & 8 :.G 1 ;:•F i(".rF.�. '�.'i�y.4���:Prr;5 i ayr��.�k f�F,,, r - .. -i� `�- 7�`:.-.�+'� r b, •�'}Rtf�{:.»+.,. �7 .�b � r �}} F N f, p t F I 4 r ,1, �' � � I �i�.:. i�. . I � � / f li I •,� it , � �- • �, i r �d 43 . Ew '-�7„•^.�,,.^._.� s x <c'-m��a rr� + 1 .4 bft"�'i,' � sjciF aptu�� 1r3 �,r }- 5 r qt.., i+'�. � :� ! � Y Ir�'s�"'�yp,},r�.t��,,�2ik�.p r:'•.. �,af,,ii� vly7�'t�r 5�'�Je�,y. ��^`�51-.�,,,���� y�F l�f�C q''' F.Fp, `j t 1� s2,�+i�i�.e.• '� 3. f ���51�r. ��. �..� r� ,fi i 3L ��r �? t� "7':�'�tFr '�,Jd� I. I y _��'' � 41 k�"�f; -=r A'' � �� �..,, .3di2ir���'�1��'t`t•'� q���"`.:�r r r�(�Alk to r�; £ +�$r, '- ¢¢ { x 1A MN l 1 + . r r i s r,m�� ti �.. r 1 p 4 Ai 64�, 4`.� `� p MI ck Ae: I i�nylt' + S' N' � ,. � � �'.. t ! + # ! � "!I :�f :�Yx; �' �i 's• {I 1 {�f �"��".�1 h `A 'YI', ''r. $�; " a r�l ��k.I. `� ,��; AMA .jtp�,h'^{� ,�-•. o- ..,1 '7 ..t eye .art �..:y f !K ri�y i'�',�'p �1 -t P_ I, ` t, 3 .t u y! •` ��;� ,° 4 .C,;Ir', ,r5,• )tIti s__ x`r +� s, :rtv S'- .. .l '..�„a � ��,.� � -�� � � �' f�, �+� } s t1 t• � xr� �t f ar I j# { , ", 1 4,?. 'l.r I a.: + : 't f .. �', $ I•,� rf.Z r�sn i. -i15i`,tn' "� - r.�.:r.; 'i. f " l u. I: . e ��y.r #;,Ja s�!)Fr -U u�l � * R �•i;y� E�s,9-�,7�1�' r �. 541i, .1 �1. At To, a � �r 3�. , r , "V' ,t r .7 tt dot ....... !&e3t' � � J-em� •,Il'CMTy "rk 4 i Tr' r e 473tna'4'r. `E'r2 A t. Y 2S7 b�L I ` 66% re a n" I� Thtl' S a 43, ;i4Cres iiP Q�C�`` Ld N d6n area . _ an1ArbrA 4- Py , ` r `^ r` �m h x z� T'railh te d �F rassian e & T .7 F� �:. k? t '".T x at.5 i Y•��F' p jr- 'A' 46, h p� 4- ' , '�A6xli'sY,tu�; 5 t�2 F7P�r>�::n "�'l.':= N.,A rC'^ ct}s5:;u'fi3°a.... :'�8.'Prir�.i""- �f*�4; ,.�.��'m.,.,.� #t ��'-.,F,c�af.� iXt�g ',;'s 6{hY!,'T�'�r'x v�l•�. �S r�`"rE,,,,,�a�al�kt,l�s ?+ -sF ?.��: a3 *".`"°••t -,"•�•' �k� rr�"`;� r �'�3 �' � iem .k. ... 5�" �d .r' w .�� a�.Yrc�,r aw,ra�c� :•'� `'7��X4 tud�xF snev�sv�Id` d � �`ei W`+uawdlt�J �g a,d°�.$� .F' �' r^x. �ttr:,- y !.✓ `.,."",...`.� �s4 1r ,r+ f� r�� - rs„ d £ N !i �` a JR : q. r,' � 't F �-x �, 1 �2 sAr�7 bS F " r � t''�, i f' e F .,y,,«- _ < -• r - F R ,_ "�. r Comments on FSEIR 7- Based o FMEIR 99®1 BAR-29 pg 10-66, FSEiR 07-002: proposed to use FMEIR 99-1 grassland mitigation areas FMEIR.99-1 assigned all grasslands mitigation acreage in Project/Program areas in 1999 Before Senior Center construction MM 4.3-2 needs 5 new acres, leaving 2.8 acres: Purchase and enhance private property to provide new mitigation area 3.5 acres encyclopedia lots and small pump lease area 4.0 acres Brindle/Thomas lease Remove overflow parking for Equestrian Center (55 utility posts) 2.9 acres next to southeast corner of Center w Suggested corrections to MM 4.3-2 and pgs 4.3-22 and 4.3-23; identified errors in Table 3.7-3 Y, CLC-20, pg10- 7, FSEiR 07-002: proposed fig 3.9, pg 3-21 as Central Park land use plan Fig 3.9 (fig 1 .0-4, FMEIR 99-1 ) substantially out of date (1997-1998) and never corrected to reflect FMEIR 99-1 changes to Plan specified in 1999 CD Suggested corrections to figure 3.9 and identified factually incorrect words on fig 3.9 Natural Park.ppt, 1/17/12 00 • • • 1 f ,n r bh ,r r. n t r ARM., yy �' t� - k a+ r drw�Ferr+lw�,:wrp i' �.:'J '�l�'�[•" • t # �5 '` t''rs�+4'.itt.� r �mr,'�. F� tiro ;ia - •f 9c°WA' ,.. � rY .q� y ni��,�fj � � :kf }� cr {Sf a?,',�'r�x.Cti`4� t . 1,.7:4u Yp ,t J+ �' N+` I .'.µ ..k. ,. ° �N7 t r' -�:. �l! 4 r'51 .'t. . 's�Yfl(•;I:r's( ,i S :xi yrw a fi�.?•`it34. V^.+} 'P wM1i� * s � � �qa� .r 4 1 r �''+F�.tx�ni,v�7 a �rFF6��y�./tra,,�,"rig'yv'w�•/ � i r -.rir �3 sy"�fil�l9 rtdp{[ �At M 4 J,e`a 1 tr r 1 yy �. 1�1'k■ ri",'1t�?-° La Pri�- nri4 Rri r.'�` i � :ry�'.E 1X� U.N P °l �Y .f`�r �.I•„ vN5.1"c .,�, ` 7 :',F`S f Y i •S:'Y y l ili .�, l y fY 4i t�" r.ti1{l T\ 1M T f 1� : !!! � f �sl p� b. a. 1 l.; •�i3 I t I S �F 1tE�{ -�t at"� St?..�>iNrlU '. �. .. ��� `�;� n�bRU A � 't. *^ � �9'F t. i yr, �13fi .n'4'7�� =�Mi.�'t �h•XF7i�Yt�?� r r� p per+ r iMOOi�e�: �" ,-0 5 ' rt y,� ril '1 i- } -a j3', �2r,(t I'�" t L 1' NN 1'.L' t14a•{,� �� '' /'�I�Ea b N Ion nav�,grasssmmv ( 14 } 1 { Y ° . ; Y. Ur'ban Fo rs Areats ionr grasse ort�ir� sf' k6�� :t ,; I:1 sof, � if i'll�+�' ilt E,(�'4 ti� t �,3' r i .t g�r�1�t P�kt'}�Yr �e rjja 44 y T6sI it": , l:, Y l; t: t. L �7F6�6I '� 4 h .tif i le 71 FEE l'� { 5,4 4.a+ �.r~4tJ, FMEIR 99 Noted Errors in Fig 3- cif FSEIR07-002 VATt Or FMTING MAIMFN-a NCE? Incorrect descriptions '""P'Y xuwilonaitrC.1eo°spiine[,I i Icu from FMEIR 99-1 �_�� -_. �'1 _,._ Slater Ave 7.8 acres non-native grass �_J lTYT `�iI♦ . MAE An;c'— !L'l1M PA°K.i°EE Am 11.4 acres landscaped E A ORFA'�� �UNT#�ANC�YVm FACIUIY wnuNnGol.--_.._ d SOLI E� IMI�ROYEM1¢NI;AND _ tPrhFO:`�EA conRouoArloN ' �y FMEIR 99-1 specifies a o osedSeniorCenter _ _•_•_ •_�.•� C)LIR I` PARCOLAlSE E T rALeERT IAKE/ natural pare L ]� FYTES NC ME4POW FA5tlttt; IIII!` SFNPIE'nAnic[ MtYHPXInIIt cENIFR without development ®Area currently designated as p '� 6 bA low intensity with plcnlc MVSIC La E'N' a AnYENruAp PLAYGRDl1NP facilities,restrooms,tot-lot and Via= i Fx15TINc J Tqum I parking. Inclusion of a senior EASPNG sHELTE center an the southern portion o '�- „+- F ITalb rt Ave thls area would require:a,land it f � se designation change'from ': to i�iinter Incorrect Equestrian Center boundaries sPOAtS`n,a� ` Incorrect facilities description I i �; , EM15,ING f St Vl NUNPNGTON LAKE OISCUG%EF F�#* Q�N: ORANGE CODNrY F Trailhead planned on top of CDF stream CC99 115E wnHCE 'TRANS«"°N .. Y FMEIR 99-1 Mislabeling of Semi-active Recreation location °. � ®' - °°•°° °°+ � .' ° ` "1 1 .7 acres Private property rights ignored } _�` F°ESE u ;i Fa° _ '' ~ i disturbed Petroleum leases w�` ACI Encyclopedia lots . „ �A�, � �reparian R.a1.oEn R oaAN iFt,Improper reference date � 5.8 ac non-native IN, A �EGIONAL MAIL14 `L. £:rd,:'• Z@' �"` for figure application ARK _ 1 ; • I _._--igrasses I1 is v srurAN A - ExISTIN � All , g ra I a ke 1p Eq �r MEp Tq INCIUpB MASSES Not the subject of FSEIR 07-002 A VARIOUS SELEGTEP 6F2C L5 _,'G IbY 1` ar -ERLl1tY 1NC1UpF53};APE SI;ELifk PILMC-i tACIUry 1NCLVDFS:ACCti5i A0AO--�9 ,rACll[ll'1NcrU!)ES.A[cFS511�,p r(].5 es specified ro-�aq�/ypy '/1,,�Q— YAtl�S,MIIYCWN6 PObL6l[E RACS,AND mcM IL'S AVENUE.R LERAFEUTIC VrNIIE,RFSiRIXkh DUIIOING PICt71C 5l Not !� ecifie q in FMEIR y_11F� /+V TRAILS AIPIFIGL NTER,OPENTURF AN LQI VCHEYM,CM5g1111111 11111EAS YAiK G t r 14/dU YE C ERd\ L9 wN INCLUDES:ACCEa5 ROAD FxolA E PS-- wtRft6 ROITNA6NA�[�r 1 li vouFV All cOUAi.hNP 7ql Lqr p S ROOM PUMN13,PARKING r `_-_FAc1U !'S QIr; d e loped V WITI RS AN P E6U $ T V PSR k•(i Ili, •i Different figure on p p �B S, 14�q��R Proposed Thera curie f`1D5. N CRFMo 3 is bNCPS5IONl Community Services website Riding eentetLocation . R rAdNCNIC ;lwRoll !`� FLO .b Pl1W $.",I ER Ri�u1®sYKi�10� Requires Charter Section 612 vote Natural Park.ppt, 1/17/12 J 0 U J Please Take the Time to do FSEIR 07-002 Correctly and Avoid Future Controversy ATTACHMENT # 10 1 ® City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street o Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 + www.huntingtonbeachca.gov FB•I7 flg9 * ® Office of the City Clerk Joan L.Flynn, City Clerk NOTICE OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL Appeal of Planning Commission Decision, Public Works Commission Decision or Police Department Decision/Action Date: February 2,2012 To: Planning and Building Department i City Attorney City Council Office Adm i n istratio n Public Works Department Police Department(only if Police related item) Filed by: Councilmember Connie Boardman Re: Appeal of the Planning Commission's Certification of SEIR No.2007-002 and CUP No. 2007-039 (R) (Senior Center) Date for Public Hearing: TBD Copy of appeal letter attached: Yes Fee collected: none Completed by: Rebecca Ross,Senior Deputy City Clerk IN ORDER TO MEET A 10-DAY PRE-HEARING ADVERTISING DEADLINE,OUR AGENDA SCHEDULE STATES LEGAL NOTICE AND MAILING LABELS MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 18 DAYS PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING DATE i *FOR ITEMS THAT REQUIRED EXPANDED ADVERTISING, PLEASE CONSULT WITH THE j CITY ATTORNEYS OFFICE i i Sister Cities: Anjo, Japan 0 Waitakere,New Zealand Item 15. - 173 HB -540- 0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH City Council Interoffice Communication TO: Joan Flynn, City Clerk FROM: Connie Boardman, City Council Member DATE: January 31, 2012 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S CERTIFICATION OF SEIR NO. 2007-002 AND CUP NO. 2007-039(R) (SENIOR CENTER) I hereby appeal the Planning Commission's certification of SEIR No. 2007-002 and CUP No. 07-039(R) for the Senior Center Project. On January 24, 2012, the Planning Commission certified the SEIR and approved the CUP at a public hearing. The reasons for my appeal are that I believe there are inconsistencies between the FMEIR for the Sports Complex and the Senior Center SEIR that need to be resolved. I also think there remain questions about the boundaries of the equestrian center in the maps contained in the document that need to be addressed. Given that this has been a controversial project, I think it is appropriate the Council examines SEIR No. 07-002 and CUP No. 07-039(R) and gives its input. Pursuant to Section 248.18 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, the City Council shall hear an appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission. SH:MBB:jv N W. Honorable Mayor and City Council Chair and Planning Commission 77 Fred A.Wilson, City Manager Bob Hail, Deputy City Manager Paul Emery, Deputy City Manager s` Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building a - Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager David Dominguez,Community Services Manager •• Robin Lugar, Deputy City Cleric ' Jennifer Villasenor,Senior Planner Kim De Colte,Administrative Assistant Cathy Fikes,Administrative Assistant ODocuments and SettingsWkesc\Local SettingATemporery Internet Files\Content.Oadook\RL6ZWEPP\0131jv1 (Boardman appeal- SEIR No 2007-002-senior center).doex HB -541- Item 15. - 174 ATTACHMENT # 11 Exhibit A THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST AS SHOWN ON THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 13 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, LOCATED IN RECORDS, OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 34, SOUTH 00-16'33" WEST, 1315.36 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID EAST LINE NORTH 89"43'27" WEST, 55.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE NORTH 89°43'27". WEST, 911 .89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75'43'15" WEST, 147.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°43'27" WEST 554.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 '46'40" WEST, 123.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62`52'49" WEST, 18.52 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 215.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT OF CURVATURE BEARS NORTH 25"3822" WEST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25°39'05", AN ARC LENGTH OF 96.26 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID END OF CURVATURE BEARS NORTH 51'17'27" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 21 '25'21" WEST, 105.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'16'33" WEST, 356.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89"4327" EAST, 1087.13 FEET; CONTINUED ON SHEET 2 OF 2 Equestrian Center Lease Area Legal Description 1 OF 2 18381 Goldenwest St, Huntington Beach, CA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS . HB -543- Item 15. - 176 Exhibit A (CONTINUE) THENCE NORTH 76'47'47" EAST, 43.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°43'27" EAST, 587.19 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 79.50 FEET WESTERLY OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 00°16'33" EAST, 628.76 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES SOUTH 89°43'27" EAST, 24.50 FEET, TO A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 55.00 FEET WESTERLY OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID LAST SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 00916'33" EAST, 27.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAININIG 24.983 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SAND 5�0 G. SG� UP. 12-31-13 La 7340 JOSEPH G. DERLETH qTF 0" cALxEu- PLS 7340 EXPIRES 12/31 /13 Equestrian Center Lease Area Legal Description 2 OF 2 18381 Goldenwest St, Huntington Beach, CA CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 15. - 177 xB -544- GRAPHIC SCALE TALBERT AVE r i inch - 250 ft. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT CENTERLINE INTER Q zso o i2s 2so p , ®� �d GOLDENWEST ST AND TALBERT AVE, OCS00 GPS 5073, FD 2.5" PUNCHED OCS BRASS ( IN FEET ) DISK STAMPED "7-92", DOWN 1.1' IN r�I cfl STANDARD WELL MONUMENT, ACCEPTED AS � N THE NORTHEAST CORNER SEC 34, T5S, R11 W. ) �3: �_ OCS GPS 5073 f') 0 U N 2203211.545 TRUE POINT co 1 GNG E 6027490.465 OF BEGINNING L1 al � a SPILLWAY 1991.35 EPOCH o Q Q o- a N89'43'27"W, 911.89' con p m 0 N89"43'27"W, 554.49' L v rn LINE TABLE: L9 c w cn L3 J!s L1= S75'43'15" , 147.08' N z°QI VV o L2= S01`46'40"W, 123.23' � AREA 24.983 ACRES 79.5' n OL3= N625249 W, 18.52� �J x DELTA=25'39'05" L4= N25'38'22"W RAID cD ai >G L=9626 EXISTING zc z n RAD= 21500. , . L5= N51*17'27"W, RAID Li BACK OF W DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE L6= S21`25',21"W, 105.11' � SIDEWALK Z o �, L7= N76 47 47 E, 43.24 _ ��' w/o 4- 0 �- °�°!'� GROUND DISTANCES TO m Z CO CONVERT TO GRID DISTANCES L8= S89'43'27"E, 24.50' ICE aa) _ o MULTIPLE THE DEPICTED L9= N00'16'33"E, 27.00' z 79 5, U 3 L- cn DISTANCE BY .99997743 L10= N89 43 27 W, 55.00 EXISTING C O a � o S89°43'27"E, 1087.13' S894327E, 587.19' CURB & — I GUTTER -- Q L7 49' WHO U OCS GPS 5059 CENTERLINE INTER GOLDENWEST ST AND CL N 2200569.821 ELLIS AVE, OCS GPS 5059, FD 3" CITY OF Cr°D E 6027477.751 HUNTINGTON BEACH BRASS DISK IN w 00 1991 .35 EPOCH CONCRETE, NO STAMPING, DOWN 0.6' IN r STANDARD WELL MONUMENT, ACCEPTED AS ELLIS AVE THE EAST QUARTER, SEC 34, T5S, R11 W. 00 ATTACHMENT # 12 Item 15. - 179 Hi+ -546- HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report SC H No. 2007041027 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Prepared for City of Huntington Beach Planning Department 2000 Main Street, Third Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 Prepared by Atkins 12301 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 430 Los Angeles, California 90025 January 2012 HB -547- Item 15. - 180 Item 15. - 181 HB -548- A. INTRODUCTION The Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Huntington Beach Senior Center project (State Clearinghouse #2007041027) identifies mitigation measures to reduce the adverse effects of the project in the areas of: aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, recreation, transportation/traffic, and utilities & service systems. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that agencies adopting environmental impact reports ascertain that feasible mitigation measures are implemented, subsequent to project approvaL Specifically, the lead or responsible agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring program for mitigation measures incorporated into a project or imposed as conditions of approval.The program must be designed to ensure compliance during applicable project timing, e.g. design, construction, or operation (Public Resource Code 521081.6). The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) shall be used by the City of Huntington Beach staff responsible for ensuring compliance with mitigation measures associated with the Huntington Beach Senior Center project. Monitoring shall consist of review of appropriate documentation, such as plans or reports prepared by the party responsible for implementation or by field observation of the mitigation measure during implementation. The following table identifies the mitigation measures by resource area. The table also provides the specific mitigation monitoring requirements, including implementation documentation, monitoring activity, timing and responsible monitoring party. Verification of compliance with each measure is to be indicated by signature of the mitigation monitor, together with date of verification. The Project Applicant and the Applicant's Contractor shall be responsible for implementation of an mitigation measures,unless otherwise noted in the table. Huntington Beach Senior Center Mitigation Mon HB - —'Reporting Program Item 15. - 182 0 i-- e v ® o • v o s • W lmplemenfafion Responsbe CompAance M 'Measure Documentafton Mon&vf Ac' ' Timl Monitor VertBcaffon Signakne Date : Aesthetics:. . MM 4.1-3(a)All exterior nighttime lighting shall be angled down Project building plans Review and Plan check Planning and away from the adjacent open space areas. Prismatic glass approve building prior to coverings and cutoff shields shall be used to further prevent plans for inclusion issuance of spillover off site. of features building permit MM 4.1-3(b) The minimum number of foot-candles deemed Project building plans Review and Plan check Planning necessary by the City to promote effective security while approve building prior to controlling glare and minimizing light spillover onto adjacent plans for inclusion issuance of areas shall be utilized in all lighting fixtures. of features building permit MM 4.1-3(c) Motion-sensitive security lighting shall be used on Project building plans Review and Plan check Planning site. approve building prior to plans for inclusion issuance of of features building permit MM 4.1-3(d)To the extent feasible, the Developer shall use non- Project building plans Review and Plan check Planning reflective fagade treatments, such as matte paint or glass approve building prior to coatings. plans for inclusion issuance of of features building permit Z MM 4.1-3(e)Trees and barrier-type vegetation should be placed Project landscaping Review and Plan check Planning Cc1 throughout the site, including along the entire perimeter, to help and building plans approve prior to v, shield vehicle headlights from adjacent uses, landscaping and issuance of 0 building plans for building permit inclusion of features Air Quality. MM-4.2-2(a) (This MM incorporates Measure Air-9 from the Contract language and Review and Plan check Planning Central Park Master Plan EIR) notes on grading and approve contract prior to The project developer(s) shall require by contract specifications building plans specifications, issuance of a that construction equipment engines will be maintained in good grading and grading permit condition and in proper tune per manufacturer's specification for building plans for the duration of construction. inclusion 2 City of Huntington Beach e o o • s • e s • tmptemer"On RwIpwsrbte Compliance . AANgaffan Measure Documenfalion Monttodn A Trmtn Montlor Vecafion S' nature7Dde MM-4.2-2(b) (This MM incorporates Measure Air-12 from the Contract language and Review and Plan check Planning Central Park Master Plan EIR) notes on grading and approve contract prior to The project developer(s) shall require by contract specifications building plans specifications, issuance of a that construction-related equipment, including heavy-duty grading and grading permit equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be building plans for turned off when not in use for more than five minutes, Contract inclusion specification language shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. MM-4.2-2(c) (This MM incorporates Measures Air-10 and Air-11 Contract language and Review and Plan check Planning from the Central Park Master Plan EIR) notes on grading and approve contract prior to The project developer(s) shall encourage contractors to utilize building plans specifications, issuance of a alternative fuel construction equipment(i.e.,compressed natural grading and grading permit gas, liquid petroleum gas, electric, and unleaded gasoline) and building plans for low-emission diesel construction equipment to the extent that the inclusion equipment is readily available and cost effective. Contract specification language shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. MM-4.2-2(d) The project developer(s) shall require by contract Contract language and Review and Plan check Planning W specifications that construction operations rely on the electricity notes on grading and approve contract prior to v, infrastructure surrounding the construction sites rather than building plans specifications, issuance of a electrical generators powered by internal combustion engines to grading and grading permit the extent feasible. Contract specification language shall be building plans for reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a grading permit. inclusion MM4.2.2(e) The project developer(s) shall require by contract Project building plans Review and Plan check Planning specifications that the architectural coating (paint and primer) building plans for prior to products used would have a VQC rating of 125 grams per liter or inclusion issuance of a less. Contract specifications shall be included in the proposed building permit project construction documents, which shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of a building permit. CD cn r Huntington Beach Senior Center Mitigation Monitoring Program 3 00 -P r-h CD I 0 0 • • • • 0 0 O lmptementafibn Responstbfe Complance MHt anon Measure DocumenWon MoniVo►in Acfrv' riming Monitor Vernicafron ' nature Date Biological Rosoioird6j MM 4.3-1(a) Nesting habitat for protected or sensitive avian Developer shall submit Review schedule Plan check Planning species: construction schedule and field survey prior to 1) Vegetation removal and construction shall occur between (including grading report,and as issuance of a September 1 and January 31 whenever feasible. activities)as evidence necessary,review grading permit 2) Prior to any construction or vegetation removal between of construction overlap and approve plans February 15 and August 31, a nesting survey shall be with breeding season. indicating conducted by a qualified biologist of all habitats within 500 If construction occurs construction limits feet of the construction area. Surveys shall be conducted no during relevant less than 14 days and no more than 30 days prior to breeding,developer Perform periodic During Planning commencement of construction activities and surveys will be shall present a survey field check to construction conducted in accordance with CDFG protocol as applicable. report(prepared by a ensure compliance If no active nests are identified on or within 500 feet of the qualified biologist construction site,no further mitigation is necessary.This approved by the City) survey can be carried out concurrently with surveys for other to the City prior to species provided it does not conflict with any established issuance of a grading survey protocols.A copy of the pre-construction survey shall permit. If nests are x be submitted to the City of Huntington Beach. If an active found,developer shall nest of a sensitive species is identified onsite(per submit plans identifying established thresholds)a 250-foot no-work buffer shall be nest locations and maintained between the nest and construction activity until limits of construction n' CDF'G and/or USFWS approves of any other mitigation activities. measures. 3) Completion of the nesting cycle shall be determined by ualified ornithologist or biologist. 4 City of Huntington Beach Q O B • ® • 0 0 9 Jmplemenivfion Responsible Compliance Mffgg#on Measure Documentation Montft A0vr7y fting Monitor VwNcafion S' nature Date MM 4.3-1(b)Burrowing Owl; Developer shall submit Review schedule Plan check Planning 1) Prior to construction activity,focused pre-construction construction schedule and field survey prior to surveys shall be conducted for burrowing owls where (including grading report,and as issuance of a suitable habitat is present within the construction areas. activities)as evidence necessary,review grading permit Surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days and no of construction overlap and approve plans more than 30 days prior to commencement of construction with breeding season. indicating activities and surveys shall be conducted in accordance with If construction occurs construction limits CDFG burrowing owl survey protocol. during relevant 2) If unoccupied burrows are found during the non-breeding breeding,developer Perform periodic During Planning season,the City may collapse the unoccupied burrows,or shall present a survey field check to construction otherwise obstruct their entrances to prevent owls from report(prepared by a ensure compliance entering and nesting in the burrows.This measure would qualified biologist prevent inadvertent impacts during construction activities. approved by the City) 3) if no occupied burrows are found in the survey area,a letter to the City prior to report documenting survey methods and findings shall be issuance of a grading submitted to the City and CDFG for review and approval, and permit. If nests are no further mitigation is necessary. found,developer shall If occupied burrows are found,impacts on the burrows shall submit plans identifying be avoided by providing a buffer of 165 feet during the non- nest locations and limits of construction breeding season (September 1 through January 31)or 250 v feet during the breeding season(February 1 through August activities. `'' 31).The size of the buffer area may be adjusted if a qualified biologist and CDFG determine it would not be likely to have adverse effects on the owls.No project activity shall commence within the buffer area until a qualified biologist confirms that the burrow is no longer occupied. If the burrow is occupied by a nesting pair,a minimum of 7.5 acres of foraging habitat contiguous to the burrow shall be maintained until the breeding season is over. 4) If impacts on occupied burrows are unavoidable,onsite passive relocation techniques approved by CDFG shall be used to encourage owls to move to alternative burrows �--{ outside of the impact area. However,no occupied burrows shall be disturbed during the nesting season unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that th ' Huntington Beach Senior Center Mitigation Monitoring Program 5 00 C� CD OQ lmplemenfalton Responsible Compibnce J Mi8 afion Meosu►e Documenfafion Monfloifng Acffvffy riming Monhor Venftofion 5/gnafu►e Date juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. Mitigation for foraging habitat for relocated pairs shall follow guidelines provided in the California Burrowing Owl Consortium's April 1995 Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines,which ranges from 7.5 to 19.5 acres per pair. ABM 4.3-2(This MM is Measure Biological Resources-4 from the The City shall Prepare plans Plan check Planning Central Park Master Plan EIR) determine the location indicating prior to The City shall mitigate for impacts to raptor foraging habitat of 5 acres of suitable enhancement area, issuance of a through dedication as open space, conservation and/or raptor foraging habitat and verify retention grading permit enhancing areas of raptor foraging habitat at a ratio of 1:1 for to be conserved and/or of a qualified acres of impact on raptor foraging habitat to provide suitable enhanced. biologist habitat values and functions for raptors. Mitigation for impacts on The City shall formulate raptor foraging habitat will be accomplished within suitable areas a plan to accomplish Review and Review plan Planning that are City-owned and preferably nearby, such as the areas in the raptor foraging approval of raptor throughout association with the Sully Miller Lake Group Facility, Low habitat enhancement foraging habitat construction Intensity Recreation Area, Semi-Active Recreation Area, and/or activities,including the enhancement plan activities Midden Area/Urban ForestlTrailhead. Enhancement would planting of native trees by qualified include, but not be limited to, the planting of native trees within within and adjacent to biologist and adjacent to conserved areas of raptor foraging habitat. Prior the dedicated area. Implementation to ground disturbance, the City shall identify the particular site or Proof of retention of and completion of Prior to p Certificate of Qualified area to be enhanced and shall formulate a plan to accomplish biologist. enhancement Biologist the raptor foraging habitat enhancement activities.This plan shall activities Occupancy be reviewed for approval by a qualified biologist. 6 City of Huntington Beach lie a Implemenfaffon "Iftsp Compliance MM an Measure Documentallon MonOod Aclii* Amin Manifnr Vedr cation 5 nature l5ate Cultural Resources MM 4.4-1(a) (This MM incorporates Measures Archaeology-3, Proof of retention of Verify retention of Plan check Planning Archaeology-4, Historical-1, and Paleontology-1 from the Central archaeological and qualified monitors prior to Park Master Plan EIR) paleontological monitor issuance of a The City shall arrange for a qualified professional archaeological grading permit and paleontological monitor to be present during all project- related ground-disturbing activities, including the potential Periodic field check Throughout Planning disturbance of soils on adjacent slopes. In addition, all to ensure monitors ground- construction personnel shall be informed of the need to stop are present disturbing work on the project site in the event of a potential find, until a activities qualified archaeologist or paleontologist has been provided the opportunity to assess the significance of the find and implement appropriate measures to protect or scientifically remove the find. Construction personnel will also be informed that unauthorized collection of cultural resources is prohibited. CTJ v, v, v, CD Huntington Beach Senior Center Mitigation Monitoring Program 7 00 00 r-r F�-CD 1 lmplemenfaf#on .Responsible Compliance hWgaffon Measure Documentaflon Mor*bdn A Tim# Month Verrlrcal#on Si nature Dale MM 4.4-1(b) (This MM incorporates Measures Archaeology-6,7 Notes on grading plans Review and Plan check Planning and 8, Historical-2 and 3, Paleontology-2,3 and 4, from the approve grading prior to Central Park Master Plan EIR) plans for inclusion issuance of a If archaeological or paleontological resources are discovered grading permit during ground-disturbing activities, all construction activities within 50 feet of the find shall cease until the Research design and Review and Throughout Peer review by archaeologist/paleontologist evaluates the significance of the recovery plan,if approve research ground- three County- resource. In the absence of a determination, all archaeological required design and disturbing certified and paleontological resources shall be considered significant. If recovery plan activities professionals the resource is determined to be significant, the archaeologist or paleontologist, as appropriate, shall prepare a research design for recovery of the resources in consultation with the State Office of Historic Preservation that satisfies the requirements of Section 21083.2 of CEQA. The archaeologist or paleontologist shall complete a report of the excavations and findings, and shall submit the report for peer review by three County-certified archaeologists or paleontologists, as appropriate. Upon approval of the report,the City shall submit the report to the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, and keep the report on file at the City of Huntington v, Beach. ts, a MM 4.4-1(c)(This MM incorporates Measure Archaeology-5 from Proof of retention of Verify retention of Plan check Planning the Central Park Master Plan EIR) Native American qualified monitor prior to The City shall arrange for a qualified Native American monitor or monitor issuance of a a rotation of monitors from the interested bands to be present grading permit during all project-related ground-disturbing construction activities, including the recompaction of soils on the adjacent hillside. Periodic field check Throughout Planning Should project personnel discover any previously unknown to ensure monitor ground- cultural resources in the absence of an archaeological monitor,a is present disturbing qualified archaeologist should be notified immediately to evaluate activities the significance of the find and make recommendations for treatment. 8 City of Huntington Beach a • e ® a a o o a OLM g g g g g • • • • Implementofion 71m-nA ponsible compliance Mlfi on Measure Aocumenfaffon Monlbrfn Ac onitor Ver cafion S' nature rateMM 4.4.3 In the event of the discovery of a burial, human bone, Notes on grading plans Review and Plange County or suspected human bone, all excavation or grading in the approve grading prior to Coroner vicinity of the find shall halt immediately,the area of the find shall plans for inclusion issuance of a &Planning be protected, and the Developer shall immediately notify the City grading permit and the Orange County Coroner of the find and comply with the provisions of P.R.C. Section 5097. If the human remains are Throughout determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Ill ground- which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendent(MILD). disturbing The MILD shall complete the inspection of the site within 24 hours activities of notification, and may recommend scientific removal and non- destructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. Geology and Soils MM 4.5-1 Detailed design measures contained within the Notes on roughlmass Review and Plan check Public Works Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the project shall be grading plan and approve grading prior to implemented, including those related to: earthwork, seismic building plans and building plans issuance of a design consideration, foundations, building floor slabs, retaining for inclusion of rough/mass wall,exterior flatwork,shoring, corrosion; concrete,site drainage, soils and grading permit Building and storm drain infiltration system,and preliminary pavement design. geotechnical Safety recommendations MM 4.5-2 In order to mitigate the erosion potential of the slopes Notes on rough/mass Review and Plan check Public Works adjacent to the site, the near surface soils shall be compacted grading plan and approve grading prior to along the northern slope face (earthen berm) where the site building plans and landscaping issuance of a improvements encroach upon the existing slopes. The slope plans for inclusion rough/mass shall then be covered with an appropriate erosion protection of soils and grading permit device and drought tolerant plants. Surface water runoff must be geotechnical and prior to diverted away from the top of the slope to reduce the likelihood recommendations approval of of surficial sliding and erosion. and plant material landscape plan MM 4.5-4(a) Oversize materials, more than approximately four Notes on grading and Review and Prior to Public Works inches in size, such as concrete rubble shall be disposed of off building plans approve notes on issuance of site. Trash and other debris shall be selectively removed and grading building grading and disposed off site. plans building permit Planning ' Huntington Beach Senior Center Mitigation Monitoring Program 9 O CD Implementation Responsible Compliance Mid on Measure Documentation MonihNin AcAffly 'imin Monitor Verfrcorfon Signature Date MM 4.5-4(b)(This MM incorporates Measure Geology-2 from the Soils report Review and Prior to fill Fire Central Park Master Plan EIR) documenting fill approve soil import Remedial grading to remove compressible soils and replace properties sampling report them with appropriately compacted fill shall occur in order to Notes on grading Prior to Public Works address potential settlements. Fill soils to be used for backfill plans issuance of a around utilities shall be compacted to 94 percent relative grading permit compaction. NIM 4.5.4(c)(This MM incorporates Measure Geology-6 from the Soils report with Review and Prior to Building and Central Park Master Plan EIR) corrosion engineer approve notes on issuance of Safety Corrosivity testing of the on-site soils should be performed during recommendations building plans building permit the design phase. Corrosivity testing may also need to be considered for soils that are imported for use as fill during construction. MM 4.5-5 (This MM incorporates Measure Geology-5 from the Notes on rough/mass Review and Plan check Building and Central Park Master Plan EIR) grading plan and approve grading prior to Safety The soil expansion potential shall be evaluated in detail prior to building plans and building plans issuance of a issuance of grading permits. If expansive soils are present near for inclusion of rough/mass design grades, potential for heaving or cracking of rigid soils and grading permit structures shall be addressed through soil removal, chemical geotechnical and building v, treatment,or other equivalent measures. recommendations permit x 10 City of Huntington Beach a e o • • e • • o lmpternenlaffon Responsible Co!rZ7nakrerDcde A49Mep a Dociimentallon MonNOri A Ti MomVor vefffZ HazardM'Material$ MM 4,6-1(a) (This MM incorporates Measure Hazards-15 from Risk Management Plan Review and Plan check Fire the Central Park Master Plan EIR) & approve any prior to In the event that previously unknown soil contamination that Site Health and Safety grading plans for issuance of could present a threat to human health or the environment is Plan inclusion any grading encountered during construction, construction activities in the permit immediate vicinity of the contamination shall cease immediately. A risk management plan shall be prepared and implemented that (1) identifies the contaminants of concern and the potential risk each contaminant would pose to human health and the environment during construction and post-development and (2) describes measures to be taken to protect workers and the public from exposure to potential site hazards. Such measures could include a range of options, including, but not limited to, physical site controls during construction, remediation, long-term monitoring, post-development maintenance or access limitations, or some combination thereof. Depending on the nature of x contamination,if any,appropriate agencies shall be notified(e.g., City of Huntington Beach Fire Department). A site health and safety plan that meets OSHA requirements shall be prepared v, and in place prior to the commencement of work in any `O contaminated area. The developer shall ensure proper implementation of the health and safety plan, If required, contamination shall be remediated in accordance with mitigation measure MM 4.6-1(b). ' Huntington Beach Senior Center Mitigation Monitoring Program 11 110 N CD m e a • • e o o -o e m a s m H� I � s o • • e a e e • Impfementatfon Responsible Compliance ' W M on Measure DocumenknYon Montfort A Trmin Monitor Ver>�Icalion Si Rafe MM 4.6-1(b) Closure reports or other reports acceptable to the Closure reports or Review and Plan check Fire HBFD that document the successful completion of required other reports approve closure prior to remediation activities, if any, for contaminated soils, in acceptable to the reports other issuance of accordance with City Specification 431-92, shall be submitted HBFD that document reports acceptable any grading and approved by the HBFD prior to issuance of grading permits the successful to the HBFD that permit for site development. No construction shall occur in the affected completion of required document the area until reports have been accepted by the City. remediation activities successful completion of required remediation activities MM 4.6-1(c) (This MM is Measure Hazards-9 from the Central Documentation of Review and Plan check Fire Park Master Plan EIR) consultation with approve prior to Any unrecorded or unknown wells uncovered during the DOGGR documentation issuance of a excavation or grading process shall be immediately reported to rough grading and coordinated with the City and Division of Oil, Gas and permit Geothermal Resources(DOGGR). In addition,should any known and unexpected landfills be excavated and discovered during the x construction phase of the proposed project, construction work will be immediately halted and the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA)will be notified, Further construction operations will resume at the discretion of LEA and upon work approval by LEA. MM 4.6-1(d) Prior to the issuance of grading permits and during Notes on grading and Plan check prior to Prior to Fire construction, the project shall comply with all provisions of the building plans issuance of a issuance of HBMC Section 17.04.085 and HBFD City Specification 429, Methane and Hydrogen rough grading any grading Methane District Building Permit Requirements. A plan for the Sulfide Testing Plan permit permit and testing of soils for the presence of methane gas shall be Review and during prepared. If necessary, measures to reduce levels of gases to approval of testing construction within levels determined acceptable by the HBFD (such as vent plan systems)shall be implemented,if required by the HBFD. 12 City of Huntington Beach lmplemenmation ResponvIle Compliance M%ahon Measure Documentation Monilori Ac& Trmin Monif+or Ver&Cffon Signature Dale Hydroldgy'and Water Qdality. MM 4.7-1 (This MM incorporates Measures Water-2 and 3 from Water Quality Review and Plan check Public Works the Central Park Master Plan EIR) Management Plan approve WQMP prior to The project proponent shall prepare and implement a site- and documentation issuance of specific Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP). precise This (WQMP) shall identify specific stormwater BMPs for grading permit reducing potential pollutants in stormwater runoff. BMPs shall be designed in accordance with DAMP requirements and the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report prepared for the proposed project. The WQMP must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the beginning of construction activities. The WQMP shall include the following BMPs along with selected BMPs to target pollutant removal rates: ■ Waste and materials storage and management BMPs (design and construction of outdoor materials storage areas and trash and waste storage areas,if any,to reduce pollutant introducton) tZ ■ Spill prevention and control BMPs o ■ Slope protection,and stabilization BMPs ' ■ Water efficient irrigation practices(Municipal Code 14.52 Water Efficient Landscape;water efficient guidelines and Conceptual Landscape Plan). ■ Permanent erosion and sediment controls(e,g,, hydroseeding,mulching,surface covers) The Project Proponent is encouraged to consider the following BMPs: ® Minimize directly connected impervious area,including: pervious concrete(if applicable)or other pervious pavement for parking areas(e.g.,turf block), pervious pavement for paths and sidewalks, and direction of rooftop runoff to pervious areas. CD ■ Incorporation of rain gardens or cisterns to reuse runoff for v� Huntington Beach Senior Center Mitigation Monitoring Program 13 0 UN Milli I F� implementation Responsible Compflance M' ffon Measure Document+7Hon Montlarlit AcNvfty riming Montto► Venkation Signakffe Date landscape irrigation • Alternative building materials ■ Site design and landscape planning • Wet vaults for subsequent landscape irrigation ■ Sand filters for parking lots and rooftop runoff • Frequent street and parking lot sweeping • Media filter devices for roof top drain spouts(including proprietary devices) ■ Biofiltration devices(swales,filter strips,and others) ■ Proprietary control measures(if supporting documentation is provided) ■ Drain inlet filters ■ Pet waste station ■ The upstream drainage area must be completely stabilized tti 14 City of Huntington Beach •O O O O •O • 0 8 ® ® ® m ® d rmplemeMalion Responsible Compliance M'' n Measure Documentation Monifori Ac6vr7y Tlmin Monkir Ve►dfcatlon Signature7Date MM 4.7-2 (This MM incorporates Measure Utilities-8 from the Hydrology and Review and Prior to Public Works Central Park Master Plan EIR) Hydraulic Report and approve plan and issuance of a The project proponent shall prepare a Project Hydrology and Drainage Plan documentation grading permit Hydraulic Report and Drainage Plan that incorporates stormwater conveyance facilities to provide adequate site drainage and minimize erosive forces. This Hydrology and Hydraulic Report shall include analysis of stormwater runoff peak flow and total volume from the 2-year and 100-year storm events for both existing and developed conditions. Stormwater conveyance and detention features shall be designed and incorporated into the proposed project to reduce runoff forces to non-erosive rates for the 100-year storm events. To the maximum extent practicable, the Drainage Plan shall also reduce post-construction peak runoff rates and timing to existing conditions levels. Off-site road improvements shall be included in the Hydrology and Hydraulic Report and Drainage Plan. The Hydrology and Hydraulic Report shall include a Drainage Plan identifying any additional stormwater quantity BMPs, their locations, and design characteristics, along with the flow dissipation piping, bioswales, and vegetated buffer areas already identified on the Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan (Figure 3-7 in Section 3.0 [Project Description]). Supporting documentation shall be included to show that incorporation of these features will result in post-construction runoff erosive forces that do not exceed existing conditions erosive forces. The Public Works Department shall approve this Hydrology and Hydraulic Report and Site Drainage Plan prior to the issuance of a precise grading permit. It is recommended that the Site Drainage Plan be coordinated with the WQMP to maximize efficiency of stormwater runoff detention/retention and water quality treatment. Huntington Beach Senior Center Mitigation Monitoring Program 1�* r+ I!CD '"" e e e • a s e s -se •• • r..r 1 • O O m • 0 0 0 O impfemenfation Responsible Compliance Mfii oBon Measure Documenfafion Monfdorf Acfivity Vining Monitor VetBcafion Skjnaftffe Date MM 4.7-5 The project proponent shall prepare and implement a Nutrient and Pesticide Review and Prior to Public Works Nutrient and Pesticide Management Program, Management Program approve NPMP issuance of a A Nutrient and Pesticide Management Program(NPMP) shall be grading permit prepared and implemented to minimize the risk of pollutants associated with landscape establishment and maintenance practices in runoff waters. This NPMP shall include guidelines, application regulations, and applicator training, and shall encourage minimization of chemical use. Nbise " IJIM 4.9-1(a)(This MM is Measure Noise-3 from the Central Park Contract language and Review and Prior to Planning Master Plan EIR) notes on building plans approve building issuance of a The City of Huntington Beach shall limit grading and construction plans for inclusion building permit activities to daily operation hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.(Monday through Friday)and 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.on Saturdays. Construction shall not take place on Sundays or Federal holidays. MM 4.9-1(b)(This MM is Measure Noise-5 from the Central Park Contract language and Review and Prior to Planning Master Plan EIR) notes on grading plans approve grading issuance of a The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has estimated that and building plans plans and building grading permit o noise levels from construction equipment can be lowered as plans for inclusion and a building much as 13 dBA by implementing noise control features that permit require no major redesign or extreme cost. The City of Huntington Beach shall require that all construction equipment incorporate noise reduction control features. All vehicles and compressors should utilize exhaust mufflers, and engine enclosures as designed by the manufacturer should be in place at all times. 16 City of Huntington Beach e a a • • o o• • Ic0 o e • e e s o 0 Implernenkiffon Responsible Complance M ' Measure Docurrrentation _ w0who Ac' ' Vmlria Monitor Verrncalion St natwe Dame ttecreation . MM 4.11.1 (This MM is Measure Recreation-1 from the Central Final building plans and Ensure At least 30 Planning Park Master Plan EIR) project grading plans construction days prior to At least thirty days prior to construction, the City of Huntington schedule signs are construction Beach shall post signs in the vicinity of the project site indicating posted and disc activity the proposed construction schedule of the senior center facility golf course hole is (including location and hours of operation) and shall complete relocated the permanent relocation of the disc golf course hole located at the southern boundary of the site back to the official disc golf course. transpotta4ionlTraffic; . MM 4.12-4 The intersection of Goldenwes# Street at Talbert Street Improvement Review and Prior to City Avenue shall be modified to include the project driveway as the Plans&Traffic Control approval of Street Certificate of Transportation west leg, with appropriate corresponding signal modifications Plan Improvement Plans Occupancy Manager and intersection lane improvements. The City Transportation &Traffic Control Manager shall determine the ultimate signal modifications that Plan are most appropriate for the project site. Design recommendations include, but are not limited to,the following: ■ Split phase operations for east-west movements ■ Adequate pedestrian green to accommodate a slower walk Yl speed(e.g.,2.8 feet per second) 0 Address design site distance ■ Increased letter sizes on roadway signs ■ Increased signal clearance intervals is - ;�:- ��r'- ': ,,- ,,•: ,; Y !fl $teIRIS v'Ut III7<t �8�'Serrrl e ,. 4.13.1 (This MM is Measure Utilities-7 from the Central. j MM Park Green Acres Project Review status of Prior to Public Works Master Plan EIR) Green Acres issuance of a If the Green Acres Project is not yet operational and able to Project and ability grading permit supply water to the program level elements of the Master Plan to supply the prior to the development of final plans and specifications, project additional studies will be undertaken to determine the extent to If Green Acres CD which one or a combination of the following measures will be Project cannot necessary to reduce impacts to water supply systems for supply water to the •� Huntington Beach Senior Center Mitigation Monitoring Program 17 CD •a e • o • s • -•o • •m o F-� I MIME I-- o o m v m v o o v INCINC Implementation Responsible Compliance MI1f atlon Measure Documentation Monr7aN Ac �min Monitor VercaHon S! nature Date program level elements during the interim until water from the project,prepare Green Acres Project is available: study/studies ■ Reduce the required irrigable areas by 10 percent; identifying ■ Enhance the utilization of existing groundwater systems(i.e., measures to subpotable wells);or reduce impacts to ■ Supplement the irrigation supply with water from the water supply systems domestic water system. MM 4.13.2 The developer shall install low-flow water devices and Notes on building plans Installation of low- Prior to and Public Works waterless urinals as part of the project. flow water devices during and waterless construction urinals activities MM 4.13.3(This MM is Measure Utilities-9 from the Central Park Electrical load analyses Conduct electrical Prior to Public Works Master Plan EIR) load analyses construction Prior to construction of program level elements, additional activities electrical load analyses shall be undertaken to determine the need for additional electrical transformers. 79 City of Huntington Beach '0*AZT- INS' M ft ME/ 2100 1 01 SON; 11 , , va FEW Nw/ al vell g/ ag 3 At's my Q, Y" p"ff VMS. posts '110 Ok Not ,-VAN 'A 151011", 321 tin ,. .. ....... all .1........................................ W A"A .......... W E tery fjl," 771', N. ,,,,, .................... CD (CIA CD j Slater Ave. 1 3 lad/ Central Senior) Center o Library Project Site �albert Ave. 3 Sports _. Complex Disc Golf Huntington Lake course •i i (n i 0I �,.•.,,..,,., � Equestrian �� , _. Center 'v W Mobile Homes Ellis Ave. i �' . u amit, ............ It N '7c A PC- u -t o1sutngi r, - We nein t "Ill, h" Ik"' S oj I&C, All 0 re And',,,�,h.., -viojapprovAlEI R �t ®un ,�l- 'W"M rite d ir' e' ceastan t® re" S�EIw, ft,ajo pr associ "a' ted,- ent1t1emex,I1tS '""" W w. 91, R SEIR' 0T-002 . A viron]tA A V -I-iid 'ver- n e 11 ,1�,/ - An "I kthe-p6tenti'" azes,,y , imvact,s associatea ;with the," constructiona`,nc , o erAtio'n."bf-,a' new or ,to- s "to ot p p e c nter - if iflin e U, 0 e"' coury i Re"" I th th -7 g regar CD I El y, cer oig acjequacv, Wif the",, SI t fill N, 7 P"V 'o-,"'o ,A02 7#1 CD 41—F, op -,,w VNI, I I �,WM lr- IPP 0_0 ,arc- % Olt V, A VP vv Orfy 'areas :,,,i n ' Wdin0 7- SElR 'N 02 analyzed 1issUpC, g . . All Aesthetics A lk Land , Use "&' Planning, Air Quality Noise Biological Resources Public Services Cultural- Resources Recrp-kolt i o n �..•.. ass 'Geology & } Soils Transportation/Traffic Hazards &.-,,Hazardous Utilities & Services , 1Vl atefials ,S, stem s Hydrology &- WatG.H G Eer MISS140k sill"', 9ualit y NVJ 'Ilk 'am s. vow NO F, N5 V� 'x sr Ag IP7 44% Ol IK AM d, 0 14;11 `6 I.................. P� jg %New -VIR, 'A K l�s� sit's ell ana WO"N -4 -,W �= all move Prop'ert ' ]f rwer y,e new��a ernat e,.-,,sites : - 's Ma' nolia T Fare .w -echo?ol9ank FArm", ri . e10 s choot,site),"-Kettier (School A te" court rul specifically mentionedin cou "Al „� � " ) ,, u- GasanalysisGreenho se , -41Z` Propo -e- s d General hla end eat Nssw w . Ianpac'ts,- due to, I ��mse If os opow-space from,of ui� S, ju uimbv"""fe'e' s rim U ' date,---�7io $ p f.baseli,n,,,e,,, co,ndit�-,,,io)n� ,� s ne 'cumen -11irb" 'ghout'do,"' u 411 6 O CD AP ,f pro"" -Alb 77, �k, t� IF -ems �,4 "4� �. 10 :All ro act,. 6"ec' ific impa ct s, c, ,n be. reduce d -VI -to-less thansiig nifica nt levels with the -Incorporation of mitigation measures (MM) and City standard code requirements CT , 61 Cumulative impacts assoc� t�ed- ,W` ith�� r, aesthetics found to be sign� ifii cant , Al Statement of Overriding Considerations Is , required' -4 Moll :4W FOP- It 41- �qjo 4 _:A "ImWa .may g %� ir Al M mi Ea 7 V- 'Al T 4� ey --cy. ;F1 Le" "'A Ap "Am OV, r w w r VC, A 'N7 'T St A Ar"11111 I IN 'k, It It A" ve -fk4" *`p- ' "A I 100Q 6 A% 0 z"'I"'O", AK, w 3 A- W, Ap to w� o n4 visi I -&-were efe-,a ve Ar- A J; 7. _ . z, v b n- -,Ui,,-8e n nlfft��'Wu, of rtij ec -C ant All, �*A ii ed B 't/ y iglnG7-ener`Ala t'1ri^ nM�h's erP lan;zA A ONlt roj e- ReMu c.ed,,,.,P, ctq ,,41,11'11�1, x Al t, V Alternative Central Park,, Site.,,,(n�c 'o-f SO 44,Mettler"'Sch00' F("e losed sch0"ol site) -MM "A� uiew P,a' r,,,,k,'Vschool .(clos'ed scho' dif,,`s'd ova, e nwc ofGLth� 0 p -",(Ma� nli / i )gn& Maolijank,Farlli 'A �-�, TO-- Nw "A #1, alternative Central ' Site wp , lb e thz �, envvonetallysup erg ral o0 s IO r A CD • "'a CD n*v- "ma; *r 4�- A ,41, '30 ig- �111 P-11 71 am Ge ai A -4 0 1A Inc�� 1-,,at e s the entra�l �P-arast uk-Mer, por Plan into , the, Community Services a n d Recreation Element of the General Plan ISCI S ,-the en ,a rastlPlanU" ate " U tral P k M to.;- cco mmo date the 5-acre 's'senior - 'W T %Ien ter-,�sito - y , re- esignating ,' , ,b d th ite ra 0 insit Y m,,a," ow,6� Int " atl`101 hig-h6l Jot"ens,,,it, y recre w area >, ��a�lilll :\�' r d'k�it lIIII tlllli'J rt, I �)Y , r r V �'' iYli�l I�i III, i V � �� � � I V liili uiililll u �u �s "EMN\\ - \.\M \ \ ,a<� A71M(sls � N' c -_ Item 15. - 08 Conditional �Jse Permit Constr uct and operate an up to 45,000 square foot se nior center facility in ,C ntral `. Park Site has a grade differential greater than 31,11, feet -ST'll aw adhift Commission Action as Jai.u ary '24, 20, ® - Certified SEIR No. 07-001 as A"" dequateand k CEQA 'r ancewi compl e"te in" acco, d, ft requirements-, and .in compliance with Curt decision, , Re ' 'C omm ' valended appr of General, laW',0 Amendment No. to''Irlie City Council! Approved, CUP No.." 07® 3 with fi d.i s Nand. condit ions' .,of ap roval p ing Fa Appro' ed ,,CEQA, Statement "of Find s of *40 with,, aStatement,� of Overriding,.Considerations CD a- MIMI a: ' Of y P.'eWAIII X yy{'nj ° dm M y.T I nfa CUP : , e unc�l . h ,. B ma �eroar The,, appeal letter raises "the following issues : Discrepancy between Final Mastezr-,""EIR..--for '� Sports Complex and Senior Center, SEUR Eq'uestri"anCenter:-,Bounda'y s t 1111 f T ........ oo ........ IF ,Af entc enter E-1 4P, 4-1- 5 N _ R. ....._E1 19, fh'e,,,j 999 'Fin al. aster FIR: 72 a:cre-s of,,ifon " '..,,grassla " d in Ceoltral fark " 0 Approximately 36.6, acresof t e iVe "grassland areas to be "developed or,,otherwise a i -u se improved'. for- a p ,'� a "d Since the, FinatMaster, FIR wals,-,a opted, the ' ity bias implemented 'or proposed-approximately ,16.9 -g acres- of" within non ''native rass-lAnd areas 'Sports C plex was"'not cons*de ed' raptor om i r 'ad ,,foraging habitat,'an"d its develop nt -ot,di n or mitigation for enhanic"" eme of�'ral to r ab*tatl foraging, h CD 100 IR/ -en 0 ..... . . ... S -E M ter S -C-ent r,S-F si IR The Central ParkM"aster Plan preserves .1 Remaining 35A acres of non-native grasslan,' 5.18 acres of ruderal/bare land within the Sully MilleT` Lake Group, facility area 0 Preserved areas total 41 .2 acres and wou-Uprovide the - 0 o area for rAptor foraging mitigation. im Program level elements of the Master,,Plan '(appr x. 36 acres) ,, A"!1.13 Actual amenities that have beend eve lo e diproposedto , p d " ' approx., 16 9 acresevelpe i Inthe snorcn er ) A m 0 0* J ..... 9 v"N A' AP, FIN: "S U( nt w,,A "A KI 4 w"pp S, W W, -7 J ^ F4a r JS _41 A ia t s2k5�- 7Ilk, Thi�,miues ce , �,as an ,* xi� aes erh'"", aw. $'S v e e-"*- a eaw-ack' ' "I 'ase r -A-- 77 AV, 44V "AP ar e u zing existing"""" rator �,"t d tili Uliii 0 recently st wv t 'leaw�area no revio usly used oundar -of lease area has not chi angedor,-, :R y ^ * - ,,expanded beyond.."originamease area p i CIII, �Oq -Ass,u"' 'e"does n -imp 6,t-- act senior center ro O or A- V Hqe S�r S, A T If 7111 4" AS, w V, mow t'j CD w i�po "T Vi -Alg SIF W e in j jV U,-AW M 101 N ,11 0 04 !,M,) " 0 , f 7- " 0 n g J* qM40V--, CertifyEIR Nw b7-O02 � because"Jt, autaua l tna ze , t he. , l i otentaenvirqnmental pactidentifieso 'p 0 alternatives andl`�M itigatio, measures,,,,,,,responds t the court po, ruling and has been" prepared in accordanc e with CE'QA Approve General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 M ' Approve CUP No. 07-039, with findings and suggie'st" d % conditions of approval' IM Approve CrQA Statement of Findings of Fact,"W"' ith' Statement of,,,O,.,ver,,ridiCAonsiderat%onsng A oo COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED REGARDING AGENDA ITEM: Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002, General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R) Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval for the Huntington Beach Senior Center Project HB -583- Item 15. - 216 February 15, 2012 Dear City Council members: My name is Eileen Murphy. I am 96 years old and love Seniors. I am writing you to urge you to stop this senior Community center proposed to be built in a passive park. My reasons are: 1 . A lawsuit has been heard and the judge decided the appellant was right on all but one count. Because the City delayed action, his suit had statute of limitations on the filing on one claim. 2. The proposed Senior Center is planned with a bigger footprint than the project included. 3. We need a new Senior Center on the some site as the present antiquated center there now. This was donated to the city zoned already for a senior Center and is adequate for a nice two or three story building which is allowed at this site. 4. As a Senior, I know the Goldenest Talbert site is inappropriate for seniors. It is in a hole with a steep grade to walk up to reach Goldenwest. The street's signal does not allow enough time for seniors with books and a walker to get across the street. Then there is a long walk downhill and uphill to the Library entrance. A return trip with books back to the center is a killer of a task. 6. The Senior Center does not need ballrooms for bar mitzvahs or wedding receptions. It is located in a passive park with nesting birds which don't need lights, music, cars parking and noises late into the nights and all day. 7. City should lease one of the unused schools for five years. Move the whole operation at 17th street center staff, programs and bused in seniors for the catered lunches now served. as they do now. Item 15. - 217 H B -5 84- 8. New center should be built after the old center is demolished. Three story new center with exercise rooms, ballroom for the monthly Senior Square dancing, step dancing and all the classes now being conducted at old center. 9. The 17th location is centrally located. The new center has no walking neighbors. Seniors gradually do not drive so a neighborhood Senior Center is preferred. I personally have attended old center classes and they are too small rooms and crowded. My grandson who texts would tell me this is TMI (too much information) but I feel this should be said. Respectfully, Eileen Murphy 201 21 st Street FIB CA 92648 KB -585- Item 15. - 218 Esparza, Patty From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 8:39 AM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: FW: PLEASE SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW SENIOR CENTER Attachments: NEW HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER.docx Is the Senior Center on the Agenda for tonight? I can't remember... Johanna Stephenson I Executive Assistant I City of Huntington Beach 1 0:714.536.5575 1 lohanna.stephenson@surfcity-hb.or From: J D Miles [mailto:jdmiles@socal.rr.com] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 3:03 PM To: Shaw, Joe Cc: Stephenson, Johanna Subject: PLEASE SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW SENIOR CENTER Council Member Shaw, Please support the citizens vote for the construction of the new Senior Center in Central Park. John Miles 19316 Wingedfoot Huntington Beach 1 Item 15. - 219 xB -586- April 7, 2012 City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department ATTN:Jennifer Villasenor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Senior Center General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No.07- 939(R) Dear Ms. Villasenor, The purpose of this letter is to express my concerns as a private resident of Huntington Beach regarding the senior center project. I am speaking for nobody other than myself. This project does not comply with the HBZSO 213.06 land use controls for OS-PR subdistricts. That code section lists the following permitted OS-PR use classifications and notes that"Use classifications that are not listed are prohibited": ® Public and Semipublic o Park& Recreation Facilities o Utilities, Minor • Commercial Uses o Animal Sales and Services—Equestrian Centers o Commercial Recreation and Entertainment o Communication Facilities o Eating& Drinking Establishments With Take-Out Service, Limited (only as an ancillary use that is compatible with and part of a park or recreational facility; only as a take-out service establishment, where patrons order and pay for their food at a counter or window before it is consumed and may either pick up or be served such food at a table or take it off-site for consumption) o Vehicle/ Equipment Sales and Services—Commercial Parking Facility • Accessory Uses (limited to facilities incidental to an open space use) o Accessory Uses and Structures • Temporary Uses o Animal Shows o Circuses and Carnivals o Commercial Filming xB -587- Item 15. - 220 The senior center at Central Park is intended to perform all of the services(and then some) of the existing Michael E. Rodgers Seniors' Center and the adjacent Seniors Outreach Center. These services include the following items(listed on the city web site at http://www.huntingtonbeachca.gov/residents/human services/senior services.cfm) that are prohibited uses in OS-PR subdistricts per the default exclusionary language of HBZSO 213.06: • AARP Volunteer Income Tax Assistance • AARP 55 Alive Safe Driving Course • Autumn Health Fair& Flu Shot Clinic • Blood Pressure Clinic • Preventative Healthcare for the Aging Program • Financial Planning Consultation • HEAP—Home Energy Assistance Program • H1CAP Health Insurance Counseling Program • Homeowners & Renters Assistance Program • Legal Counseling • Notary Services • Telephone Service • Utility Tax Exemption • USDA Food Commodities Program • Care Management works with seniors, families, and caregivers to provide support services, education about senior services, emotional support during times of need and individualized care plan development. • Meals to the Home provides three meals per day to qualified seniors. • Transportation "Seniors on the Go" provides door-to-door service to medical appointments, shopping centers, Rodgers Seniors Center and any other reason within Huntington Beach. Escorts are available for those needing extra assistance. • At Risk Senior Program • CHERISH, Community Helpers Engaged in Restoring and Improving Seniors' Homes • College Internships • Daily Care Call Program • Durable Equipment Lending Service • Emergency Grocery Certificates • Friendly Visitors • Holiday Meals • Information and referral to a variety of resources • Needs and strengths assessment • Senior advocacy • Surf City Senior Providers network Item 15. - 221 HB -588- These are all worthy services that can make a real difference in the lives of seniors. My own 85- year-old father utilizes some of these services through the Newport Beach Oasis Senior Center. Senior center proponents have been driving the point home for years that these are core services rather than ancillary services. Yet none of these core services are permitted in OS-PR districts such as Central Park according to HBZSO 213.06. This project simply does not comply with the HBZSO, and as such must be denied as submitted. Sincerely, X&?'4 D, g4dL�/ Mark D. Bixby 17451 Hillgate Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92649-4707 714-625-0876 mark bixby.org HB -589- Item 15. - 222 Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline[norepiy@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 6:23 PM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10869 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council -Agenda&Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: Bob Watts Description: For Apr 16, '12 agenda item. I want to report & oppose the attempt of RSC staff handing out pink slip flyers they made+ a mailer to City Hall in favor of& trying to talk last Fridays Movie audience into voting for a new senior center in the park once again by showing up in force next Mon night. There's a bunch of us active seniors there, not tree- huggers, who don't want or need a "New" Senior Center in HB &like our current ocean- view one just like it is. We don't need A/C,more heat or new toilets. What we do need is the carpet shampood or replaced, an open PC Lab for end-users &less city staff in the afternoons M-F when it's mostly empty inside & out in back parking lot after lunch. IF you wanna talk about an additional senior center somewhere in HB then, IF the money is there now, we can do that maybe but we don't need or want a replaceme nt to our current RSC at 17th& Orange Sts. Most of the hateful old people I've met there don't deserve a nice new one anyway. Expected Close Date: 04/10/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. 1 Item 15. - 223 HB -590- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF H`L NTINGTOIN,T BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT ANEW SENIOR CENTER g I SUPPORT THE ElNVIRON?\g;NTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A,SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDS-.N"vNl`;,ST AND I"ALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY TBE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH /_70, SIGNATURE_ �__— DATE� QZ0 f 2- TO ALL OF THE, HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL 11,1IEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- Iv1ENTS: • I SUPPOf TA NEW SENIOR CZN lER a 'SUPPORT THE IEN VIRONNfEN T AL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) a I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT TI-IE GOI,DEN97o'E8T AND TAL.BERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CI'FIZI;lNS O?F HLP_NTINGTQN BEACIi SIGNATURE___ 4SG1 DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL NIENIBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITI-I THE FOLLOWINIG ST.ATF- MTJNTS: I SSUPPORI' A NEVv SENIOR CENTER it I SLIPPt=tRT TI-IL; E-iWIRONME.NTAl:, "Hipp AC'I RF?C1RT (EIR) a 3UPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT'I HE GOLDEN]W E.ST.AND'T,a.LBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CIT.ZENS OF HIJNIT.NGTON BEACH SIGNATURE � al' �� HB -59,1- DATED/�, Item 15. - 224 TO ALL OF THE ITUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I A1\9 A RESIDENT Or THE CTTY OF HLTNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: i SUI?PORT A_NEW SENIOR CENTER d I SUTJPO,NCT THE ENVIR•GIMAENTA.L Ih-1PACT iZEPORT (ETR) S1JI'POR T A SENIOR CEINI'TER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TA.LBERT LOCATION VOTED ON I3Y'I'H.E C.'IT}LE.NS OF HUNTENIGTON BEACH SICTNATURE �' --DATE A04 �F TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I ANI A RESIDENT OF THE C'.ITY OF HL'NTNGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: [ SUPPOP.T A NEW SENIOR CENTER I S UPPORT T HE•E.NVIRONII•IENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 40 I SUPPORT A.SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENVvEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY"►HE '�TIZLNS OF HUivTING T,)N BEACH SIGNATURE J1 . �c��/s— DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I At%4 A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HT-TNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATF- NiENTS: 0 IS[J.PPOR'T A NEW SENIOR CENTER m 1 SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENT.A T, INIPA%"T REPORT (I fp--) - -31 I SLTPPOR:i.A SENIOR CENTER AT TFIr, GOLDENWEST AND TAL13ERT LOCATIONN VOTED ON BY T].E CI T HENS OF HUNTIN GTON BEACH c r;u a Tr rn _ � — -- DA t I Item 15. - 225 2- HB _59� ICo ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL.MEMBERS AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLO�IVING S�TATE- VfENTS: XfPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT TINE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT TIRE GOLDCNWES; iVN�FD TAI,BERT LOCATION VOTED O'j\BY THI1 CITIZENS OF FTLTNTR�GTON BEACH SIGNATURE DAT O& ALL, OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS M A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- iNTS: [� �bd!0,,t4- I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER 7� I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) 16 PPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 3NATURE \ `t- ���� DATE 7'— 7 020 /2- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CII`Y COUNCIL MEMBERS i AMA RESIDENT OF THE i ITY OF HUIvTINGION Bi?ACH A aTT, T GT)TT' 4gT4 T M IS �P A NEW SENIOR CENTER ! YL/ !.. L� 2 9✓vo7 11eeD /4/145z& 0,1I Y6T • I S R+TBE ENVIRONWNTAL AT IPACT REPORT (EIR) A/07- 41 WEST T , : i I-S � A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDEN AND TALLBERT LOCATION 10TED ON BY TILE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH L/AA_ sfJ1s'SF��ER� SIGNS&TURF _ DATE _ ✓•� HB -593- Item 15. - 226 g v. City Of Huntington Beach 'nks�&,s 8 .• e a 2000 Main Street ® Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (714) 536-5227 www.huntingtonbeachea.gov r rem Office of the City Clerk t Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk NOTICE OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL Appeal of Planning Commission Decision, Public Works Commission Decision or Police Department Decision/Action Date: February 2, 2012 To: Planning and Building Department City Attorney City Council Office Administration Public Works Department Police Department(only if Police related item) Filed by: Councilmember Connie Boardman Re: Appeal of the Planning Commission's Certification of SEIR No. 2007-002 and CUP No. 2007-039 (R) (Senior Center) Date for Public Hearing: TBD Copy of appeal letter attached: Yes Fee collected: none Completed by: Rebecca Ross, Senior Deputy City Clerk IN ORDER TO MEET A 10-DAY PRE-HEARING ADVERTISING DEADLINE, OUR AGENDA SCHEDULE STATES LEGAL NOTICE AND MAILING LABELS MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 18 DAYS PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING DATE *FOR ITEMS THAT REQUIRED EXPANDED ADVERTISING, PLEASE CONSULT WITH THE CITY ATTORNEYS OFFICE Sister Cities: Anjo,Japan 0 Waitakere,New Zealand CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH City Council Interoffice Communication t� TO: Joan Flynn, City Clerk FROM: Connie Boardman, City Council Member DATE: January 31, 2012 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S CERTIFICATION OF SEIR NO. 2007- 002 AND CUP NO. 2007-039(R) (SENIOR CENTER) I hereby appeal the Planning Commission's certification of SEIR No. 2007-002 and CUP No. 07-039(R) for the Senior Center Project. On January 24, 2012, the Planning Commission certified the SEIR and approved the CUP at a public hearing. The reasons for my appeal are that 1 believe there are inconsistencies between the FMEIR for the Sports Complex and the Senior Center SEIR that need to be resolved. 1 also think there remain questions about the boundaries of the equestrian center in the maps contained in the document that need to be addressed. Given that this has been a controversial project, I think it is appropriate the Council examines SEIR No. 07-002 and CUP No. 07-039(R) and gives its input. Pursuant to Section 248.18 of the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, the City Council shall hear an appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission. SH:MBB:jv N _ CCU cc: Honorable Mayor and City Council s. Chair and Planning Commission - ; Fred A.Wilson, City Manager cI Bob Hall, Deputy City Manager Paul Emery, Deputy City Manager = Scott Hess, Director of Planning and Building " Mary Beth Broeren, Planning Manager David Dominguez, Community Services Manager •• Robin Lugar, Deputy City Clerk _ Jennifer Villasenor, Senior Planner Kim De Coite,Administrative Assistant Cathy Fikes,Administrative Assistant C:\Documents and SettingsVikesc\Local SettingsUemporary Internet Files\Content Outlook\RL6ZWEPP\0131jv1 (Boardman appeal- SEIR No 2007-002- senior center).docx NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, April 16, 2012, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 11-004 AND APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO 07-002 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 07-039(R) (HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER PROJECT), Appellant: Council Member Connie Boardman Applicant: City of Huntington Beach. Property Owner: City of Huntington Beach Request: Subsequent EIR No. 07-002 analyzes the potential adverse environmental impacts associated with the senior center project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). GPA No. 11-004 involves incorporating the Central Park Master Plan into the Recreation and Community Services Element of the General Plan and updating the Central Park Master Plan of Uses to change the 5-acre senior center site from a low intensity to high intensity recreation area to accommodate the senior center development. CUP No. 07-039(R) represents a request to construct and operate up to a 45,000 square foot one-story senior recreation facility on a site with a grade difference greater than 3 feet. The 5-acre project site is located within the 343-acre Huntington Central Park and generally located southwest of the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue, between the disc golf course, which is at a higher elevation, and the Shipley Nature Center. The senior center site would comprise up to a 45,000 square foot senior center facility, a 227-space parking lot with" spaces for City vehicles and shuttle buses, and an outdoor open space area. EIR No. 07-002 and CUP No. 07-039 were initially approved by the City Council in 2008, but subsequent legal challenges set-aside the approvals necessitating a new approval process. General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 is necessary to comply with the court ruling on the previous senior center CUP and EIR approvals. No changes to the previously approved facility are proposed with respect to site layout, floor plan or architectural design. Location: 18041 Goldenwest Street (5-acre site located southwest of the intersection of Talbert Avenue and Goldenwest Street) Project Planner: Jennifer Villasenor NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection by contacting the Department, or telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, April 12, 2012. C:\Documents and Settings\decoitek\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QC3PO5V8\041612 (Senior Center GPA and Appeal of SEIR and CUP) (2).doc ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning and Building Department at (714) 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. Joan L. Flynn, City,Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 714-536-5227 http://huntingtonbeachca.gov/HBPublicComments/ C:\Documents and Settings\decoitek\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\QC3PO5V8\041612 (Senior Center GPA and Appeal of SEIR and CUP) (2).doc 09 LS/09 �s �,a�/ neal�l}z mo��amZ9 Vt=56}MJUJ tip a}}diiu112 0 G$/09190 Aaany qj!m algljedwoo«8/5 Z x,,l.azls lagel MUM i I i i , l is I : is I � s ll I � , i I ` �puTenYH� 6�9Z6 Vp `laeag uo qunH! 8 b9Z6 Vp loag u ung9t9Z6 Fp O'egg uu oI�I IZZLV£Z# , EM �IH Inoo ol ZL Ajj uzoZ ! , WE aaua� Lt,9Z6 Vp`T1o�ag coif , ' H'' Lt,9Z6�dp `T1oEag uo uiqunHj Lt'9Z6 V3 `Peag uO UnH auE7 qutodxjee- 81I oue-1 jujodM-1 I I181 aue'I EZFIMO Z88LI aaurea.TX}'d /2urx L'P1aAi ouug Xuo l O8LZ6 VD`un.Li !. sE Eiuua ua Lt�9Z6 V3`rloEag uo unHl� 8 V9Z6 Vp `T1oEag u0y2ul ung I q, J O9I : jQ aPes.ed ISI9 tt#`anuaAV sTH9 I90L s44ei00ssV Ca 2g s.TaAI sa/W, yin '7IoP�sY7�i zTPU'V juEdnoop I � 8-V9Z6 Vp"Pegg u012u4 mH 8t,9Z6 V3 'gOt'Gg u012uRMH, ; 8t,9Z6 V3`lgosag u0I2uiqung £t#`anWAV sr{1g I SOL II Zt#`anuaAV ME I SOL . I t#`anuaAV KIM I SOL iuednoopj I �Trednoopi �TTEdnoop I � ai size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8166 606160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 09I-8/09 i5®(aaAV oaAe algljedwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z 1emol op allanbll3 09�8/0� o°� 4 3 Z,{ .gfIp"�anbi;I10 09G8/09G9®fuany u�lM algl�edwoa„8/9 Z x„I.ails I^--. 165-34 - , , 1165-345-15 165-345-16 Wilson Bruce arren &Deborah L 1 : 'Nagatoshi Patricia &Michael Lightcap Keith J Huntington Beac , 17791 Quintana Ln 17781 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6634 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6634 165-345-17 ;165-345-18 165-345-19 Nash Lawrence V Bruckler Shawn &Melissa Rapchun Trust Po Box 270 17761 Quintana Ln 17751 Quintana Ln Wedderburn, OR97491-0270 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6634 �'; Huntington Beach,CA92647-6634 165-346-01 : ' 165-346-02 165-346-03 Villano Alfredo S I : ,Kuhnke Barry Kuhnke Barry 17752 Quintana Ln i18895 Rockinghorse Ln 18895 Rockinghorse Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6635 ; ' Huntington Beach,CA92648-1550 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1550 165-346-04 I ; 165-346-05 :'; 165-346-06 I Killmeyer Donald H Chia ramonte Margie J Hunt Christina 17782 Quintana Ln i17792 Quintana Ln 17812 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6635 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6635 '! Huntington Beach,CA92647-6635 i i 165-346-07 I , .165-346-08 165-346-09 Snyder David C ,Sandusky Robert Lee Williams Charles&Janie 17822 Quintana Ln i 17832 Quintana Ln 17842 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6635 ,Huntington Beach,CA92647-6635 untington Beach,CA92647-6635 I ; ' I 165-346-10 ; !165-346-11 �65-346-12 Barney Donald W Jr :Anderson William M Coppola Claude &Donna R 117841 San Leandro Ln 17831 San Leandro Ln j 17821 San Leandro Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6676 ; ':Huntington Beach,CA92647-6676 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6676 '165-346-13 ; '165-346-14 165-346-15 :Larsen Susan M Headley Stephen G Jones Julius L&Shannon L !17811 San Leandro Ln 17791 San Leandro Ln 17781 San Leandro Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6676 ! Huntington Beach,CA92647-6675 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6675 1165-346-16 ! : '165-346-17 165-346-18 Nowak Richard E & Bonnie J j Albert Steven N j : Kim Benjamin B&Alicia M 17771 San Leandro Ln '17761 San Leandro Ln ! 17751 San Leandro Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6675 'Huntington Beach,CA92647-6675 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6675 j 1165-347-01 165-347-02 165-347-03 Iwamoto Ross Yukio Ross Jerry W Davis Leonard J 17752 San Leandro Ln 17762 San'Leandro Ln 17772 San Leandro Ln ;Huntington Beach, CA92647-6640 : Huntington Beach,CA92647-6640 i Huntington Beach,CA92647-6640 :165-347-04 165-347-05 165-347-06 Prohaska Dan S ;Burdette John M Fender Plyllis G 17782 San Leandro Ln ;17792 San Leandro Ln ! 17812 San Leandro Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6640 !Huntington Beach,CA92647-6640 'Huntington Beach,CA92647-6640 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/81.60 ++aaaaeksiae,1�x 5!�'"cCflRiRd l�I�n J�v cY®534A/84rp,Qn/Rirn 09 1-8/09190 faaA oGm algljedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z jewao}ap ajtonbl13 09M8l09®9b 1Y afea3}q�] e�q! 9x, &�3gk a� anb.13 09 G9/09�5®fuany L4!m alglledwoo„g/g z x„[azls l?,--. 110-186-07 j 110-186-08 110-186-09 Poyyak Patricia G IObert Trust Johnson J A 3916 Cedar Bayou Or 15271 Shasta Ln : .3079 Maiden Ln Dallas,TX75244-7217 'Huntington Beach, CA92647-3024 Altadena, CA91001-1726 j 110-186-10 '110-186-11 111-010-69 City Of Hunti on Beach City Of Huntin n Beach :.ICity Of Hu ngton Beach 2000 M ' St Po Box IPo Bo 0 Hun ' gton Beach, CA92648-2702 !Hu ngton Beach, CA92648-0190 : 1Hu ington Beach,CA92648-0190 i 111-010-77 1 1111-010-78 1111-010-79 Chevron Usa Inc , iChevron Usa Inc ,Chevron Usa Inc Po Box 1392 iPo Box 1392 ;Po Box 1392 Bakersfield, CA93302-1392 Bakersfield, CA93302-1392 Bakersfield, CA93302-1392 i j 111-010-87 111-071-05 111-071-19 City Of Hu ton Beach (City Of Hu gton Beach : City Of Hu gton Beach Po Bo 90 Po Bo 90 j .Po Bo 0 tington Beach, CA92648-0190 tington Beach, CA92648-0190 � ' �H ington Beach, CA92648-0190 111-071-25 I I111-071-26 111-071-Z8 City Of Huntin Beach I,City Of Huntin n Beach City Of H ington Beach Po Box 19 iPo�BoPo B 190 Hunt' on Beach, CA92648-0190 .Hun Beach, CA92648-0190 I tington Beach, CA92648-0190 111-071-29 111-071-31 �.11-071-32 1 ICi Of�9�09to n Beach 'Pity Of Hunt' on Beach City Of Hunti n Beach ty Po Bo �htington Po Box H tington Beach,CA92648-0190 I Beach,CA92648-0190 H. Ington Beach,CA92648-0190 I ! 111-071-35 - :111-071-37 j , I1�11-071-38 jCounty Of Orange County Of Orange I City Of Hunting5on Beach Po Box 187000 Po Box 4048 Po Box 19 ,Sacramento, CA95818-7000 anta Ana, CA92702-4048 1 Hunti Ion Beach, CA92648-0190 j 111-071-52 I111-071-5�ington 111-071-56 �Kela Pacific Investments City Of H Beach �, i�ity Of Hun ti on Beach 18281 Gothard St#201 !Po B 190 Po Box 19 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1250 ntington Beach, CA92648-0190 I Hunti on Beach, CA92648-0190 111-075-02 j ' ,111-075-03 I11-075-04 jacks Dev Co Llc Murphy Cynthia B Rmt Golden Years Llc 18265 Gothard St 715 Fremont Ave :18204 S 3rd St Huntington Beach, CA92648-1224 South Pasadena, CA91030-6035 Fountain Valley, CA92708-4427 111-075-05 111-075-06 111-075-07 Sykes Angela !Jajama Llc KlettJeremy Carl Merle 18253 Gothard St ( 18249 Gothard St 18245 Gothard St Huntington Beach, CA92648-1224 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1224 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1224 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ' ' tL�� / /�-- Etiauettf$tlelf�ias��t'�52r5�8R 6dtttuat'tMe�'�f6bi'tete�����Q1��0/8160 �T T f 0918/0919®faany oans algit'edwoo ww Lg x ww sZ tswaoi ap 9119nb!13 so09�9/09�9®Nany qAh algltedwoo„g/g Z x,,l.az!s IP--' 165-355-13 ! i165-355-14 165-355-15 Borostyankoi Frank ( !Collier Clark J Owens Margaret P 6722 Calpe Cir !6712 Calpe Cir 1 17912 San Leandro Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6614 (Huntington Beach,CA92647-6614 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6677 165-355-16 1 165-355-17 1165-355-18 Luth Phillip A&Tracy R Hadjiyannis Straty S&Jennifer B ! (Wexler Susan Jane 17902 San Leandro Ln I17892 San Leandro Ln 17882 San Leandro Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6677 !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6677 !Huntington Beach,CA92647-6677 165-355-19 j �165-355-20 �165-355-21 Guerre Christopher&Andrew iSedia Sandra L Miller Bonnie E 17872 San Leandro Ln 'Po Box 1594 : 17862 San Leandro Ln ; Huntington Beach, CA92647-6677 ;Huntington Beach, CA92647-6677 �unset Beach, CA90742-1594 I j 1I I . ' label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/81,60 Ftin'iiett fainat'N2*8&aDmootibltWtl Aaya 0,,WO/83 000/81 6 0 09 G9/0919®AJany oaAe aq}edwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z jzwao�ap auanbll3 09R8/09®9b �1�! 0�1!k�aA9x„ &i?}t apc }anbq 99l-9/09 G5®tiaAy qvm algljedwoo,,9/g Z x„ azls lei 165-354-07 165-354-08 165-354-09 Hales Jewel E !Erickson I E Gaffney William A&Treva 6671 Soria Cir 117892 Quintana Ln 17912 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6644 ;Huntington Beach, CA92647-6669 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6669 165-354-10 1165-354-11 �165-354-12 Bowers Curtis `Carr William F Jr iMetteer Lillian E 17922 Quintana Ln �16412 Eagle Ln ; �6641 Luciento Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6669 !Huntington Beach, CA92649-2704 ; Huntington Beach, CA92647-6672 165-354-13 ;165-354-14 '165-354-15 Peterson Family Trust Gilbert Ronald J : iSmaw Kathleen 6651 Luciento Dr , 16661 Luciento Dr 16671 Luciento Dr f Huntington Beach,CA92647-6672 ; Huntington Beach, CA92647-6672 :Huntington Beach,CA92647-6672 165-354-16 ; '165-354-17 ji '165-354-18 Velarde Michelle La Salle Brian D I Sloan Michael D 6681 Luciento Dr �17921 San Leandro Ln ! 117911 San Leandro Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6672 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6639 ! !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6639 165-354-19 I165-354-20 j : 165-354-21 Grover Genevieve I Davis How d L Barker S & D Family Trust 17901 San Leandro Ln Huntin on Beach, ! i10911 Furlong Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6639 !Santa Ana, CA92705-2572 ! 165-354-22 �165-354-23 165-354-24 Lane Linda D Yano Hiroshi ( 'Batterman Todd & Katie !17871 San Leandro Ln ! �17861 San Leandro Ln ! I17851 San Leandro Ln IHuntington teach,CA92647-6639 'Huntington Beach, CA92647-6639 i Huntington Beach, CA92647-6676 j 165-355-01 ' 1165-355-02 �165-355-03 (Burton Vernon Peter& Diana L Hines Jimmie S Ohshima Haruo 6602 Luciento Dr 6612 Luciento Dr I �622 Luciento Dr !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6632 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6632 I! lHuntington Beach, CA92647-6632 �1657355-04 !165-355-05 1 �165-355-06 Bailey James E 3rd ! !Pedigo Jerry L IBenson Brett H 6642 Luciento Dr '6652 Luciento Dr !6662 Luciento Dr lHuntington Beach, CA92647-6632 ! Huntington Beach,CA92647-6632 (Huntington Beach, CA92647-6632 165-355-07 1165-355-08 ! 65-355-09 I : 1De La Torre David &Lynette M ; ILepp Michael A lenning ark Stanley 16672 Luciento Dr : 128855 Half Moon PI on Beach, Huntington Beach,CA92647-6632 !Santa Clarita, CA91390-5276 �165-355-10 �165-355-11 j �65-355-12 Henderson Larry L ; Sanders Rip Allan &Sharlene E Whaling Joseph T 6721 Calpe Cir '6962 Lawn Haven Dr ! t732 Calpe Cir Huntington Beach,CA92647-6614Huntington Beach, CA92648-2121 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6614 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ��/ //� Etiauett �ei�eat'2 1i �3a bt�t l��rgc l rQ/�f68018160 ��A`7 �� �� 0918/091go Aaany NAs a!gitsdwoo ww Lg x ww gZ tsuaaoi ap atjanbij3 0918/09�gr> �afrraaRgltigd +�'i TSB Ianbl13 ,i9 i q/09 GS®luany qm 9[gij2dwoa,$/g Z x«I•ezls Ian--- 165-352-14 I 1165-352-15 165-352-16 Esparza Family Trust j ;Nelson Joan P 1/an Gorder James Dennis 17921 Carranza Ln '17911 Carranza Ln 17891 Carranza Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6670 'Huntington Beach, CA92647-6670 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6670 165-352-17 165-352-18 :165-352-19 Gomez David &Laura : ,Connley Mel H &Gay H IElkhouri Roukoz& Robin Renee 6572 Colon Cir 16561 Colon Cir I '6571 Colon Cir Huntington Beach, CA92647-6667 l ' i Huntington Beach, CA92647-6667 ! iHuntington Beach, CA92647-6667 � 165-352-20 165-352-21 1 :165-352-22 Newlin Carolyn J IBIouin James M lii (Peyton Stephen M 17 98 1 Carranza Ln 17971 Carranza Ln ( :17861 Carranza Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6674 `Huntington Beach, CA92647-6674 1 `Huntington Beach, CA92647-6674 165-352-23 I165-353-0 j ; ;165-353-02 Haggard Ralph H ;Foster ris E iFarrow David L 1 17851 Carranza Ln Hu mgton Beach, 6612 Aracena Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6674 !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6611 165-353-03 '165-353-04 1165-353-05 Hudson Majesta M : IJorgense orman G IMedlin Joseph M & Galyn Dedeaux 6622 Aracena Dr I lHunti ton Beach, �. ; 17851 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6611 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6673 165-353-06 1165-353-07 I165-353-08 Beard Claire M 'Tchira Arnold A Living Trust i Grosch Glenn A j 17961 Quintana Ln : 1179 Bay Shore Ave 17881 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6673 I : jLong Beach, CA90903-3452 'Huntington Beach, CA92647-6673 165-353-09 1165-353-10 '165-353-11 Singh Brinda Karns Martin E & Maria Del Socorro I iAnderson Donald G & Donna 17891 Quintana Ln �17896 Carranza Ln 17892 Carranza Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6673 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6664 ;Huntington Beach, CA92647-6664 165-353-12 '165-353-13 165-353-14 Brine Antony E& Elizabeth S ! Kraig Jeanne C §p��ose, vid J 17992 Carranza Ln 117872 Carranza Ln ! Sa Huntington Beach, CA92647-6664 I 1 (Huntington Beach, CA92647-6664 165-354-01 �.165-354-02 Narang Kama[ K 1Masuda Dennis �165-354-03 Di Laura Ronald D ,4790 Irvine Blvd#105-444 17862 Quintana Ln 117872 Quintana Ln Irvine, CA92620-1998- Huntington Beach, CA92647-6678 : '.!Huntington Beach, CA92647-6678 165-354-04 165-354-05 165-354-06 .Maher Dean Patrick i Walker Brian L& Chaeli K :ImhoffTimothyA 17982 Quintana Ln 6672 Soria Cir 6681 Soria Cir Huntington Beach, CA92647-6678 I "Huntington Beach, CA92647-6644 1 !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6644 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 091.8/09 k9®(aany oane aigl�pdwoo ww /g x ww 9Z jewaoj ap 9119nbiI3 09R8/0 �oafiPa��$ ai }B mwnbd 09 G9/09I-9®luany utlM olg4L,dwoo„8/9 Z x«�azls la,.-. 165-347-07 165-347-08 165-347-09 Miller Wray &Mary Elizabeth ;Brown Kathleen A Thomas Russell E Huntingt Beach, 17832 San Leandro Ln 17397 Santa Suzanne St Huntington Beach,CA92647-6640 : 'Fountain Valley, CA92708-3301 165-351-03 165-351-04 165-351-05 Freeman Ronald W&Judith Dunn Cathaleen (Plante David J 17871 Altamirano Ln 17881 Altamirano Ln j Po Box 9116 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6607 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6607 Naples, FL34101-9116 I 165-351-06 ' i165-351-07 ' 165-351-08 Jordan Victor E &Josephine E Durant Stephen P Verity Clifford E 17911 Altamirano Ln ! 3702 Seascape Dr 6521 Cadiz Cir Huntington Beach, CA92647-6609 'Huntington Beach,CA92649-2520 j : Huntington Beach,CA92647-6613 165-351-09 1165-351-10 j 165-351-11 Hunt Tony S&Michele M Plager Cathleen jLambert Arthur J 6511 Cadiz Cir i6501 Cadiz Cir 6502 Cadiz Cir Huntington Beach, CA92647-6613 { ; ;Huntington Beach,CA92647-6613 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6613 165-351-12 :: ;165-351-13 I, ; .165-351-14 Simmo Kenneth DCarpenter Kenneth A&Michaela Johns Charles W i Gr ville, 16522 Cadiz Cir 6562 Luciento Dr 'Huntington Beach,CA92647-6613 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6631 165-351-15 i165-351-16 �65-352-01 Chang•Ching Song Ross Thomas E& K L Living Trust (Burroughs James M 9069 Mcbride River Ave 6582 Luciento Dr '18102 Newmoon Ln Fountain Valley, CA92708-6405 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6631 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1027 165-352-02 165-352-03 ; 165-352-04 Hilger John P ILee Timothy M & Kristen D Calkins John R Jr 17862 Altamirano Ln :17872 Altamirano Ln 17882 Altamirano Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6604Huntington Beach, CA92647-6604 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6604 i . . 165-352-05 1.165-352-06 165-352-07 Martinez Denise K Arnold Family Trust Pierson Family Trust 17892 Altamirano Ln 17912 Altamirano Ln : 17922 Altamirano Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6604 ItHuntington Beach, CA92647-6610 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6610 165-352-08 165-352-09 1165-352-10 Spangrud Mark ILujan David J &Caroline �and Raymond Eugene 5611 Ridgebury Dr ! 16571 Luciento Dr 6581 Luciento Dr Huntington Beach, CA92649-4827 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6630 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6630 I 165-352-11 l ; '165-352-12 165-352-13 Brown Laurence A j Campbell Curtis D Weber Richard R 6591 Luciento Dr i 5862 Liege Dr 6611 Luciento Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6630 j :'Huntington Beach, CA92649-4643 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6630 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 �/}� /� 1--COX _NR60/8160 C�/- 09 t 8/091go A19AV oaAa a!ggadwoo ww Zg x ww gZ jawao�ap a119nb 13 ��8/09G9®N9Ay gllm 9lgl}edwoo„8/g Z x„t 9z1s lag, 165-344-02 ' ,165-344-03 1165-344-04 White Christian E& Melinda G Yoneyama Craig T (Nelson David S& Kathy 17762 Carranza Ln ;17772 Carranza Ln 17782 Carranza Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6616 . 'Huntington Beach, CA92647-6616 : :Huntington Beach,CA92647-6616 i 165-344-05 ! 1i165-344-06 465-344X Rapoport Alexander Jay&Sarah Lynn I Berman Leone (Johnson mily K17792 Carranza Ln 12 Coleman Ct : jHuntin , j Huntington Beach,CA92647-6616 Chico, CA95926-5622 165-344-09 I ; 165-344-09 i '165-344-10 Dziurawiec Edward J ; 'Zaragoza Eric David & Debbie Ellen Kempster Barbara P 17962 Scotia Cir ! 117842 Carranza Ln 17841 San Doval Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6540 �, Huntington Beach,CA92647-6616 I ; Huntington Beach,CA92647-6537 165-344-11 i ; -165-344-12 ; 165-344-13 Slinker Yachiyo � ;Cunningham Paul Douglas&Barbara Jo Procaccini Sallyann S 17831 San Doval Ln i17821 San DovaI Ln 17811 San Doval Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6637 !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6637 (Huntington Beach,CA92647-6637 165-344-14 i ' 1165-344-15 165-344-16 Viaciunas Andrew J & Gen ute Getz Matthew W ; ITawdi Walid W 17791 San Doval Ln P781 San Doval Ln j : 17771 San DovaI Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6637 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6637 lHuntington Beach,CA92647-6637 l � l II I 165-344-17 ` lI165-344-18 �165-345-01 ! Reeves Janice ! (Iwamoto Richard T& Rose Y (Henderson Martin Wayne &Sandra Lee 17761 San Doval Ln 17751 San Doval Ln 0752 San Doval Ln j Huntington Beach, CA92647-6637 !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6637 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6638 j 165-345-02 '165-345-03 1 . 65-345-04 Furman William &Winnifred Van Der Upwich Marie Antoinett 1Berardini Michael A i 17762 San Doval Ln I : �,Hu17772 San Doval Ln 17782 San Doval Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6638 I ntington Beach, CA92647-6638 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6638 165-345-05 1165-345-06 65-345-07 Massengale Cynthia S Trust onn Wiktor& Ewa Kirkham Timothy R&Angelica R 17792 San Doval Ln 117812 San Doval Ln 17822 San Doval Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6638 !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6679 { Huntington Beach,CA92647-6679 165-345-08 �65-345-09 65-345-10 Combs Rex na Family Trust undine Kyung Hi&Joseph Edward Grove Darrin Huntin Beach, 7842 San Doval Ln 17841 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6679 ; Huntington Beach,CA92647-6673 ,165-345-11 165-345-12 165-345-13 Rhinehart Rodger William Tillman J Earl ; ;Crawford Jeffrey A 17831 Quintana Ln 17821 Quintana Ln 17811 Quintana Ln Huntington Beach,CA92647-6634 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6634 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6634 I label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible MtirAvery-05160781 Etiqud#bEdEsiagrtftb`I W ccHimtibtg wot;We*g5m$�60/8160 092/09�9c,AJOAd oaAe @Iq!judwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z jewo}ap a;}anbg3 BLS/09!_9®IAAy yIIM ol4lledwoo ,S/9 Z x„ azls lag, 165-034-20 165-034-21 165-034-22 Lesovsky John Phan Hoan G Bumanglag Arvin Linh Nguyen 6932 Rio Vista Dr '6942 Rio Vista Dr 5952 Rio Vista Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6660 !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6660 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6660 165-034-23 ; .`16/Box90 1165-152-35 Benevento Giacomo Citton Beach , 'City Of Hunti on Beach Po Box 2076 1Po 1Po Box19Huntington Beach, CA92647-0076 ! IHuach, CA92648-0190 IHunti on Beach, CA92648-0190 � l i I 165-163-01 i165-164-01 I165-164-02 School Ocean View District lOu June !Dickenson Veronica Anne Clafli 7972 Warner Ave 16692 Jardines Dr �682 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach Ca 92,92647 ;Huntington Beach, CA92647-6666iuntington Beach,CA92647-6666 165-164-03 `1165-164-04 ; 65-164-05 La Tempa Henry Joseph �De Angelis Rory M it,Of Hunttington Beach 6672 Jardines Dr 16662 Jardines Dr o Bo 90 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6666 (Huntington Beach, CA92647-6666 ! u ington Beach,CA92648-0190 i ; 165-165-01 ' (165-165-02 i165-165-03 Bernhoff Family Living Trust !Maher M & Rigopoulos M Trust Savage Patrick J 6642 Jardines Dr 6632 Jardines Dr , �622 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6626 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6626 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6626 ; 165-165-04 ; �165-165-05 i165-165-06 Bowman Paul W 1 ' �Thomson Matthew A&Catherine B ensen Gregory A 14931 Los Patos Ave ! 6602 Jardines Dr592 Jardines Dr !Huntington Beach, CA92649-4458 i !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6626 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6625 I, 1165-165-07 '165-343-07 765-343-08 City Of Hu ngton Beach Anderson Geoffrey Robert Pillen Family Trust P�ingtoon Of 119912 Corby Ave ; �7822 Altamirano Ln �H Beach, CA92648-0190 ;,Lakewood, CA90715-1030 kuntington Beach, CA92647-6608 165-343-09 �165-343-10 165-343-11 1, Tullio Family Ltd Ptnrshp Fisher Kenneth & Deborah ' Nissen Dean G 5331 Glenstone Dr Ir17842 Altamirano Ln 17841 Carranza Ln (Huntington Beach, CA92649-4703 1. luntington Beach, CA92647-6608 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6615 '165-343-12 '�u5j-343-13 165-343-14Nelson Stanley J &A Trust vaney Lara Graham Robert M & Lori J �4904 Onyx St 117821 Carranza Ln 17811 Carranza Ln Torrance, CA90503-2834 ! ; iuntington Beach, CA92647-6615 I Huntington Beach,CA92647-6615 j165-343-15 165-343-16 ; 165-344-01 Speakman Dane &Sally A Wolder Kenneth D j :Konowal Jam 17791 Carranza Ln !16212 Piedmont Cir Huntingt Beach, Huntington Beach, CA92647-6615 Huntington Beach, CA92649-1907 I label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery/55160/8160 //ate Etiquftb�easiterfiY 60160/8160 C�/�� �� 'CO 091.9/091.96 AJOAV cane elgi}edwoo ww Zg x ww 9Z}ewaoi op egenbn3 09t8/09G9�� 8I 4! AwalL ZItpopopMnb{}3 9i-8/09G9®Many g31M aigl3�dwov„8/9 Z x„i az{s{ar- 165-033-02 165-033-03 165-033-04 Shinn Richard D : ,Price Donald F&Margaret M !Mailman Kenneth Charles Surviv 6892 Vista Del Sol Dr ,6902 Vista Del Sol Dr ;6912 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6654Huntington Beach, CA92647-6656 I (Huntington Beach,CA92647-6656 165-033-05 165-033-06 j 1165-033-07 Reza Esfandiari& Fariba ;Simon Joan .Beach Sean W&Lisa M 6922 Vista Del Sol Dr �6932 Vista Del Sol Dr 1 16931 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6656 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6656 I (Huntington Beach,CA92647-6649 165-033-08 ; 1165-033-09 165-033-10 Aliyazicioglu Gencaga &Uliana Mc Carthy Francis D&Shirley N IFox Steven &Susan I 34 Dunes Blf .6911 Via Carona Dr I6901 Via Carona Dr Newport Coast, CA92657-2134 lHuntington Beach, CA92647-6649 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6649 165-033-11 , 1165-033-12 :, '165-034-01 j Hayes Diane K I jAlonzo,Jerry Lee Sr&Sandra W ohansson Elizabeth M 1 6891 Via Carona Dr : 16881 Via Carona Dr 6882 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6686 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6686 ; Huntington Beach,CA92647-6648 i I I I 165-034-02 165-034-03 1165-034-04 Deuel Edward Woodworth fii Vc Garrigle Walton Jay !,Mucha David R&Manuya L 6892 Via Carona Dr 6902 Via Carona Dr 16912 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6648 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6650 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6650 165-034-05 i (165-034-06 � 165-034-07 Liao Pen&Mei-yu ; Kreidel Robert Dean ! !Munoz Mauricio&Susie I 6922 Via Carona Dr (6932 Via Carona Dr ! ; 931 Rio Vista Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6650 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6650 j �Fluntington Beach,CA92647-6660 i I 165-034-08 j165-034-09 ' 165-034-10 Calise John&Stacey Croft lass Jo Ann Maxine ' i Flynn Elizabeth 16921 Rio Vista Dr .6911 Rio Vista Dr ! 901 Rio Vista Dr (Huntington Beach, CA92647-6660 ! (Huntington Beach, CA92647-6660 untington Beach,CA92647-6660 j 165-034-11 1165-034-12 165-034-13 lButski Mark A ! Davis Robert& Kimberlee Allen Jack E 16891 Rio Vista Dr 6881 Rio Vista Dr 16871 Rio Vista Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6660 I : Huntington Beach, CA92647-6660 I Huntington Beach,CA92647-6660 1165-034-14 165-034-15/ �65-034-16 Fogarty Michael O & Kim M ordon RoiSert M Mood Trust �6872 Rio Vista Dr ,Hunts on Beach, 6892 Rio Vista Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6660 I Huntington Beach, CA92647-6660 165-034-17 165-034-18 165-034-19 jDavisso lane : Stillwell Joseph W&Kathleen Musselmann Living Trust Hu gton Beach, I 825 Coastline Dr 6922 Rio Vista Dr Seal Beach,CA90740-5810 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6660 j label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible watt Avery°5160I81b0 tcNntlbVaDWO 1®rWABfW"60/8160 091.8/091.90 IUMV oaAo algljedwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z juuuo}ap apanbq 09 i8/09 G��,ll�� gdWb01����4�a�!aAnbl13 '9i8/09i9®NaAy U11M alglladwoo,,8/9 3 x azis jar 165-024-12 :165-024-13 I165-024-14 Moreo Mark A& Lisa M Baird Donald R I ;,(Gonzalez Frank E 6732 Via Carona Dr 17702 Avilla Ln :6751 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6646 'Huntington Beach,CA92647-6657 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6627 165-024-15 165-024-16 : i165-024-17 Koch Raymond Oscar IMclaughlin Terence E i Petersen Melanie R 6761 Jardines Dr 16781 Jardines Dr ! . 16791 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6627 (Huntington Beach, CA92647-6627 ;Huntington Beach, CA92647-6627 165-024-18 . : 1165-024-19 i165-024-20 ! Mc Gilton Howard J iStephenson Alice A : ISchisler Victor J 6801 Jardines Dr ; '6811 Jardines Dr 16841Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6629 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6629 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6629 ` 165-024-21 i 165-024-22 165-024-23 Stahlbuhk Birger&Suzanne ;Swanson Dale E & Marijane chroeder Kevin 0 & Brenda B 6851 Jardines Dr 116862 Jardines Dr 6852 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6629 !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6629 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6629 165-024-24 1 165-024-25 1165-024-26 Schuttenhelm Karl M IBraham Neville C i IMoore Family Trust 1 6842 Jardines Dr ` 16812 Jardines Dr ! ; ,16802 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6629 (Huntington Beach, CA92647-6629 !Huntington Beach, CA92647-6629 165-024-27 11165-024-28 I165-024-29 Mc Patrick&Bonnie I Sutis Damaso H oxsie Robert D 6792 Jardines Dr :6782 Jardines Dr 1=2 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6628 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6628 : �Iuntington Beach, CA92647-6628 165-024-30 165-024-31 1 1165-024-32 1 ;Dallas Thomas C Jackson K J &C A C Fam Trust Ross Virginia �6752 Jardines Dr 6742 Jardines Dr 712 Jardines Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6628 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6628 }iuntington Beach, CA92647-6628 '165-024-33 ; ! 1165-031-33 i�65-031-34 f'f City Of Hu gton Beach Crlson James E& Suzanne M Koob Jeffrey J Po Box�� 0 :. �ja 7632 El Nopal Ln � ' 17642 El Nopal Ln I !Hunt) Beach, CA92648-0190 ' (Huntington Beach, CA92647-6680 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6680 '165-031-35 1165-031-36 165-031-37 Sanders Gary C & Kimberly A Pisano Frank i . Fullen C Wayne& Irene S 17652 El Nopal Ln ; 17662 El Nopal Ln � ' 17672 El Nopal Ln Huntington Beach, CA92647-6680 �luntington Beach, CA92647-6680 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6680 '165-031-38 165-031-39 65-033-01 ;Scharf Frederick J Labelson Ralph 'Gocke=ell R 17692 El Nopal Ln : 17702 El Nopal Ln Hun gton Beach, Huntington Beach, CA92647-6680 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6681 � I (/ label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/81% r��'/�� Etiq.uel C foie �� /b' r>tp CiMery ftltif9h y �/846m60/8160 6�� 0919/0919,AAAV oane ag1tdwoo ww Zg x ww gZ jewao�ap 9119nbl13 09G9/09 T,wjqlspa.pnbii3 �9t9/0915®band L41A algljedwoo„g/g Z x„l azls laf- • 165-023-04 165-023-05 165-023-06 Mangham James E ;Scott Olin P I Strange Robert Alexander lv 6842 Vista Del Sol Dr 6832 Vista Del Sol Dr i I6812 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6654 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6654 'Huntington Beach,CA92647-6654 165-023-07 165-023-08 �165-023-09 ToIly Jeffrey P& Kristy L Focht Gegpge A .: Judson Pauline Elizabeth 6802 Vista Del Sol Dr Hun tin on Beach, 6782 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6654 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6652 165-023-10 ; ; i165-023-13 I165-023-14 Jay Hoon Chung&Sue Thuve Matthew& Blanca P i ,Souders Stuart Allen 6762 Vista Del Sol Dr ; .6731 Via Carona Dr I6751 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6652 lHuntington Beach,CA92647-6645 ' Huntington Beach,CA92647-6645 165-023-15 165-023-16 ; 165-023-17 Taylor Armond D ; ;Vukoje Krsto&Svetlana ; Souza Charlene F 6761 Via Carona Dr : 16781 Via Carona Dr 6791 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6645 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6645 !.Huntington Beach,CA92647-6645 165-023-18 165-023-19 1 (165-023-20 Albright Michael L& Lisa M Douglas Denice A IM- c Kenzie Beverly Anne 6801 Via Carona Dr ;6811 Via Carona Dr � 831 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6647 Huntington Beach, CA92647-6647 untington Beach,CA92647-6647 165-023-21 65-023-22 �65-023-23 Pogrund Allan H I (Mello Grace Wilson Douglas A 6841 Via Carona Dr 6851 Via Carona Dr861 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6647 (Huntington Beach, CA92647-6647 untington Beach,CA92647-6686 � I 165-023-24 165-024-01 165-024-02 Teissere Thomas N how Michael& Mary J Duffy Warren H 6871 Via Carona Dr .8872 Via Carona Dr �862 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6686 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6648 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6648 165-024-0365-024-04 165-024-05 I Trester Kenneth D Espinosa olas B &Carla Tyra V James&Stacy A 6852 Via Carona Dr Huntin on Beach, 6832 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach,CA92647-6648 I Huntington Beach,CA92647-6648 � I 165-024-06 65-024-07 165-024-08 Guite Philip R&Julie E 3ibbs Patrick & Kim 1 :6792 Via Carona Dr Trust 6812 Via Carona Dr 5802 Via Carona Dr Po Box 3711 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6648 l Huntington Beach, CA92647-6648 ;Grange, CA92857-0711 i 165-024-09 165-024-10 1 165-024-11 Pedigo William H Schnorr Ronald F Droeger Gary L& M Cynthia 6782 Via Carona Dr 6762 Via Carona Dr 6752 Via Carona Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6646 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6646 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6646 C label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/81 �Q / /��— EtiquefAbalestmI'�bQSi tchp'atlblEDv*htUer 'F6'0MfM60/8160 ��`7— �� 09 G8/09 G5®AA@Ad NAP algl}zdwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z}i?waot ap a}}anb43 09G8/09GB�U '����� oalq� 4��Z�!sae#lapnbll3 -%9 G8/09G9®NaAV qj!m algliadwoo u8/9 Z x u l azls jar- do 159-022-24 159-022-25 1159-022-26 Sunghera Gloria Deifina Baecker James& Barbara jMc Cord Carey Linell 18012 Upperlake Cir 18011 Upperlake Cir 118021 Upperlake Cir Huntington Beach, CA92648-1129 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1129 :.HHuntington Beach, CA92648-1129 ! i 159-022-27 : i159-022-28 1 1159-022-29 Pittenger Bonnie !Hjelmstrom Gordon F ISummer Breeze Invest Lic 1026 Briarcliff Rd 18041 Upperlake Cir 118051 Upperlake Cir Monrovia,CA91016-1704 ' 1'lHuntington Beach,CA92648-1129 : 'Huntington Beach,CA92648-1129 159-022-30 1 +159-022-31 , 1159-022-32 Blyth Sheila Anne lBudna Debra Bernita (Kerwin Wiliam F 18061 Upperlake Cir I ; �830 Casitas Ct I18081 Upperlake Cir Huntington Beach,CA92648-1129 ISan Luis Obispo, CA93405-4727 1 : !Huntington Beach, CA92648-1129 � I 159-022-33 159-022-34 159-022-35 Gaglione Judith D 'Colliflower Joyce L I Oswald Victor M&Sharon L j 6571 Lakeview Dr i 16561 Lakeview Dr ; 6551 Lakeview Dr Huntington Beach, CA92648-1131 (Huntington Beach, CA92648-1131 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1131 159-022-36 1159-022-37 1159-022-38 Avalon Partnership IDe Moulin Diane I ; �Susman John Kenneth 1 Po Box 207 i ' 16903 Prince Pine Ct 117220 Newhope St#224 Bonsall CA92003-0207 Houston TX77059-3100 Fountain Valley,CA92708-4288 159-022-39 �159-022-40 III159-022-41 Chiarenza John A& Kathleen F I Carlson Judi A 6etler Gary A 8082 Westlake Cir 18072 Westlake Cir 18062 Westlake Cir !Huntington Beach,CA92648 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1130 i runtington Beach,CA92648-1130 i I I I I i I159-022-42 : . !159-022-43 159-022-44 Leyva Manuel Minniti Anthony C&Paula M i mmons nneth D �i !Po Box 1862 1 118042 Westlake Cir i 1 reenvaie, Huntington Beach,CA92647-1862 !Huntington Beach,CA92648-1130 i 159-022-45 159-022-46. 59-023-01 Seastrom James W& Elena V �lRaia Peter F ity Of htington Beach �18022 Westlake Cir ' '18012 Westlake Cir ro B 190 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1130 :'(Huntington Beach, CA92648-1130 : H�ington Beach, CA92648-0190 I i � �159-023-02 �165-011-07 ; 165-011-08 City Of Huntington Beach I ;. ity Of Huntington Beach ;City Of Hu ington Beach ,Po Box 190 Po Box 190 I : Po Box 0 (Huntington Beach, CA92648-0190 'Huntington Beach,CA92648-0190 Huno'ngton Beach,CA92648-0190 i 165-023-01 ";165-023-02 265-023-03 ' tuppy Laurence J 2nd ! .,Holliday Family Trust Bateson Yolanda A .6872 Vista Del Sol Dr 6862 Vista Del Sol Dr 6852 Vista Del Sol Dr Huntington Beach, CA92647-6654 ! Huntington Beach, CA92647-6654 Huntington Beach,CA92647-6654 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/810 n Ftimiatk*iAA vmtkitQP2 "A —MMfgr;MAmiditiAimmvP51ft/,s11s®sni8lsn 6 0919/0919®faany o9Ae a!gl}edwoo ww Zg x ww gZ jumoi 9p 949nb1T3 09G9/09G ` d§fin }gg IN u8�6gZ >:tU !gyp nb!�3 a '19t9/0919®Nany 411m a{glledwoo„9/9 Z x„l azls la,... 159-011-51 159-011-52 '159-011-53 Sturm Steven D Gerrity Christine jAghajani Amir&Akiko H 18071 Clearwater Cir 18081 Clearwater Cir 18091 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA92648-1119 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1119 'Huntington Beach,CA92648-1119 159-011-54 1 1159-011-55 i 159-012-05 ll Loperfido M &R D Living Trust Flanigan Living Trust ;City Of Huntington Beach 18101 Clearwater Cir 18111 Clearwater Cir I ; !Po Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1127 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1127 : IHunti ton Beach, CA92648-0190 159-021-01 459-022-01 1 159-022-02 City Of Huntington Beach Garner Ronald J Iwamoto Earl Iwao &Joyce Lynn Po Box 190 18011 Cliffview Ln I 18021 Cliffview Ln Huntington Beach, CA92648-0190 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1120 l `; Huntington Beach, CA92648-1120 159-022-03 159-022-04 159-022-05 Haaning Patricia M 'Griffin Charlene G I ; Fee Frederick C&Jennifer 18031 Cliffview Ln I18051 Cliffview Ln 18062 Shoreview Cir Huntington Beach, CA92648-1120 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1120 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1124 I : I 159-022-06 i ', 159-022-07 I ! 159-022-08 Lucian Richard L&Susan E I iMessineo Joann llsogawa Hirohisa& Kunie 18052 Shoreview Cir �18042 Shoreview Cir i18022 Shoreview Cir I Huntington Beach, CA92648-1124 lHuntington Beach, CA92648-1124 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1124 159-022-09 �159-022-10 . 159-022-11 I ' Cook Edwin E Heckrotte Robert P Nan Holt Karl A 18012 Shoreview Cir 118011 Shoreview Cir � ; 18021 Shoreview Cir Huntington Beach, CA92648-1124 !Huntington Beach,CA92648-1124 ! (Huntington Beach, CA92648-1124 159-022-12 ; 159-022-13 59-022-14 Hale John Kramer (Hall Fred G &Sharon G immons Robert Kim 18041 Shoreview Cir i , I18051 Shoreview Cir 8061 Shoreview Cir i Huntington Beach, CA92648-1124 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1124 I untington Beach, CA92648-1124 i159-022-15 '159-022-16 ; 159-022-17 Smith Daryl D&Johnnie La Rue (Dept Of Vets Affairs Of Stateof Cal I Rawitzer Christopher W 16611 Lakeview Dr 16601 Lakeview Dr . �591 Lakeview Dr i (Huntington Beach,CA92648-1123 (Huntington Beach,CA92648-1123 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1121 i159-022-18 I �159-022-19 159-022-20 Boozan Michael Robert ! anz Christopher (Miller Dennis David Po Box 207 8072 Upperlake Cir ! 8614 Blue Bird Ave Bonsall,CA92003-0207 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1129 I Fountain Valley, CA92708-6201 j _ I 159-022-21 ! 159-022-22 159-022-23 ;Rayburn Robert T&Sue A ICarruth lanae Ordibeheshti Ala 18052 Upperlake Cir ' 118843 San Felipe St 18022 Upperlake Cir Huntington Beach, CA92648-1129 Fountain Valley, CA92708-7400 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1129 / / / label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible witl Avery 05160/8160 �� �(� 6 �o� Etiauelle du.4&rlaii5 gY Ix,.Bihffitimn%M A6�d1v�5 6WBf�d60/8160 09G8/09 G9c laany 39ne algljedwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z Iewao}ap alianba]l D918/0919®G� GTAggr�rlt�4Dl�l# dS9c 4 �, ®tl�p nb113 �9 G8/09G9® any qnn a14(ledwoo„8/9 Z x u L azls lar,_. 159-011-21 159-011-22 159-011-23 Millar Trust Verdone Andrew J &Shannon IGayler Brandon M &Tara L 18022 Freshwater Cir 19012 Freshwater Cir : '19011 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach,CA92648-1122 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1122 : Huntington Beach,CA92648-1122 159-011-24 : j159-011-25 1159-011-26 Szekeresh Robert Dobie Lori Pack „.;Olson Matthew&Shelley 19021 Freshwater Cir 19031 Freshwater Cir 119041 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA92648-1122 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1122 :' ';Huntington Beach,CA92648-1122 1 iil ' I 159-011-27 159-011-29 ' 1159-011-29 i Quilico Living Trust Minniti Anthony C Marmon Nicole M&Daniel J 19051 Freshwater Cir i Po Box 1962 ,.119071 Freshwater Cir 1 Huntington Beach, CA92648-1122 IHuntington Beach, CA92647-1862 : IHuntington Beach,CA92648-1122 159-011-30 1159-011-31 159-011-32 Berresford Blake Morris Elizabeth W Urette Linda D j 18081 Freshwater Cir {18091 Freshwater Cir I 18101 Freshwater Cir i Huntington Beach,CA92648-1122 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1122 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1125 I 159-011-33 1 1 159-011-34 159-011-35 1 Faust Gary&Maricela (Erickson James W Stevens Richard R 18111 Freshwater Cir 18112 Clearwater Cir I 19102 Clearwater Cir I Huntington Beach, CA92648-1125 IHuntington Beach,CA92648-1126 'Huntington Beach,CA92648-1126 j I' 159-011-36 (159-011-37 ,159-011-38 Cook Harold Ronald I Petrozzi Michael T 1 (Haas Patricia Ann 18092 Clearwater Cir 17422 Caspers Cir 18072 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA92648-1119 Huntington Beach, CA92647-5607 IHuntington Beach,CA92648-1119 159-011-39 �159-011-40 I159-011-41 j Dang Linh Thuy 1 (Asher Abraham Needham Daniel &Carol 19062 Clearwater Cir : 18052 Clearwater Cir 19042 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach,CA92648-1119 IHuntington Beach, CA92648-1119 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1119 159-011-42 i : �159-011-43 ! 159-011-44 'Meyers Marian Violet IFinston Philip Wills William P 900 12th Ave ' 18172,Riverside Cir j18012 Clearwater Cir Sweet Home, OR97386-2223 IHuntington Beach, CA92648-1077 !Huntington Beach,CA92648-1119 1159-011-45 159-011-46 j 159-011-47 ,Jensen Family Trust I Rouchleau Asele (Ellis James E 18011 Clearwater Cir 19021 Clearwater Cir 19031 Clearwater Cir Huntington Beach,CA92648-1119 . ,Huntington Beach,CA92648-1119 i luntington Beach,CA92648-1119 1159-011-49 I : 159-011-49 1 ( 59-011-50/ Sarver Roy M (Ramos Alector C& Martha R Bradle argaret T 19041 Clearwater Cir .19051 Clearwater Cir 1 : iu rngton Beach, Huntington Beach, CA92648-1119 ':Huntington Beach,CA92648-1119 i label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible witty-Avery 05160/816'0 kiquet8 desIZeAaW8 W 60/8160 0918/0919®(aeAd 39M algl}edwoo ww Lg x ww gZ i-ewioi ap 9119nbl}3 0918/09!l�.,Qi�{.g�.i� �k1t�IQ(i�.d tl��G�e�U�}��s�snbi�3 09[9/09[9®Nand gIIM gIglpdwoo ,9/9 Z x j azls la-_ go 111-102-16 111-102-17 111-102-18 City Of Huntingto each City Of H tington Beach ;City Of H tington Beach Po Box 190 Po Box 0 �Po Bo 90 Huntingto each, CA92648-0190 Hunt! gton Beach,CA92648-0190 Hu ington Beach,CA92648-0190 � I 1 -102-19 111-102-20 j 111-102-21 City Of Hun ' gton Beach City Of Hu ington Beach -City Of ntington Beach Po Box 1 ; Po Box 0 !Po B 190 Hunt on Beach, CA92648-0190 (,Hun ' gton Beach, CA92648-0190 ntington Beach,CA92648-0190 111-102-22 111-102-23 ; : !111-102-2/n/I City Of H u ington Beach City Of Huntington Beach '!City Of I�untington Beach Po Box 0 Po B A. 'Po ox 190 Hun 'ngton Beach, CA92648-0190 'H tington Beach, CA92648-0190 j untington Beach,CA92648-0190 111-102-25 159-011-01 '159-011-02 City Of H u ington Beach f Wiese Greg J Johnson Robert A Po Bo 90 ; '18011 Westlake Cir 18021 Westlake Cir Hun ngton Beach, CA92648-0190 (Huntington Beach,CA92648-1130 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1130 159-011-03 1'159-011-04 �59-011-05 Hansen Loren Peter Madole Kent&Joy arden Family Trust 500 38th St 18041 Westlake Cir ; 8051 Westlake Cir Newport Beach, CA92663-3221 'Huntington Beach,CA92648-1130 ; .Huntington Beach,CA92648-1130 159-011-06 (159-011-07 159-011-08 Harrison Edw Hogan I iMackell Monica A � Sandler David Joel&Sandra Marie Huntingto each, 8380 El Arroyo Dr 18081 Westlake Cir (Huntington Beach,CA92647-7011 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1130 159-011-09 i159-011-10 ! 159-011-11 Muhs 1992 Partnership ( Lonley Eugene E Quinton Jack 6921 Loyola Dr 18101 Westlake Cir 18111 Westlake Cir Huntington Beach, CA92647-4055 i Huntington Beach,CA92648-1114 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1114 159-011-12 1159-011-13 159-011-14 Hayes Family Trust Hessley Paula Hague& Michael Reaves Jimmie P 18112 Freshwater Cir ; 18102 Freshwater Cir 18092 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA92648-1118 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1118 :Huntington Beach,CA92648-1122 159-011-15 159-011-16 159-011-17 5aksa William R Campo T ya A Susskind Gail A 18082 Freshwater Cir Hunt ton Beach, 18062 Freshwater Cir Huntington Beach, CA92648-1122 ! Huntington Beach, CA92648-1122 159-011-18 159-011-19 159-011-20 Turner Timothy P Langley Shelly L Barrett] &V A 1985 Trust 18052 Freshwater Cir 18042 Freshwater Cir Hun ' gton Beach, Huntington Beach, CA92648-1122 Huntington Beach,CA92648-1122 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery-05160/81b0 // � J"Q 1 klqueratdW �m9t� 878� � g )tit �5 Q0y$ 60/8160 09�9/09 ego[uany oaAs alggPdwoo ww Zg x ww gZ iewiol ap 9;49n1b113 0918/09 fig®[uany glInn algl#edwoo„8/g Z x«�ozls r- 110-184-09 �110-184-10 '110-184-11 City Of Huntin n Beach ;Kimball Charles B 10 Of H tington Beach Po Box 190 2460 Francisco St Po Box 0 Huntingt Beach, CA92648-0190 iSan Francisco,CA94123-1815 Hunt gton Beach,CA92648-0190 110-184-12 110-184-113 110-184-14 City Of Hu ngton Beach ' iCity Of untington Beach ity Of Huntington Beach Po BoxIIIPo B x 190 ; Po Box Hunti on Beach, CA92648-0190 ;H tington Beach, CA92648-0190 Hunt' gton Beach,CA92648-0190 110-184-15 ' 1110-184-16 110-184-17 CityOf H ington Beach Schramm Robert D&Lim H I 'Mc Quillen Betty � Po Bo 90 12781 W Macarthur Blvd #b 800 Boardwalk Blvd#103 Hu ington Beach, CA92648-0190 Santa Ana, CA92704-7095 �andusky, OH44870-7033 110-184-18 110-184-19 i110-184-20 City Of Hun ' gton Beach City Of ntington Beach City Of ntington Beach Po Box ! Po B 190 o B 190 Huntington Beach, CA92648-0190 H tington Beach, CA92648-0190 tington Beach,CA92648-0190 , I 110-184-21 110-184-22 i10-184-23 City Of Huntin n Beach �City Of H tington Beach bty Of Hu ington Beach Po Box 190 Po B 190 Po Bo 90 Huntin on Beach, CA92648-0190 ;H tington Beach,CA92648-0190 ington Beach, CA92648-0190 � 110-185-02 110-185-03 ; 10YBo90 18505 City Of Hun ' gton Beach City Of ntington Beach in Beach Po Box 0 Po B 190 : PHu ngton Beach, CA92648-0190 ; ':HJington Beach,CA92648-0190 Hach, CA92648-0190 ' I 110-185-06 1110-185-07 110-185-08 Mc Gowen Roy E ! ' ity Of Hu tington Beach City Of H in Beach 42625 Liolios Dr Po Box 0 ; Po Bo 90 Palm Desert, CA92211-0921 Hun'' 'ton Beach,CA92648-0190 : H ington Beach, CA92648-0190 � l/ j !110-185-09 110-185-22 10-185-23 City Of Hu ngton Beach 'City Of ntington Beach City Of Hu gton Beach �Po Box 0 'Po 190 Po Bo 90 Hun ' gton Beach, CA92648-0190 )�ntington Beach, CA92648-0190 H tington Beach,CA92648-0190 i 1 110-186-01 A10-186-02 10-186-03 City Of Hun ' gton Beach ,City Of H Jtington Beach �hirra Lakshmikantha Po Box 1 Po Bo 90 13200 Dewey St ',Hunt gton Beach,CA92648-0190 H tington Beach,CA92648-0190 Los Angeles, CA90066-1718 �110-186-04 110-186-05 110-186-0 6- Lee Hsi Hsiang&Chen H City Of ntington Beach ' City Of untington Beach 28 Dreamlight Po/BB 190 Po x 190 Irvine, CA92603-4258 HI tington Beach, CA92648-0190 Huntington Beach, CA92648-0190 label.size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/81.60 j� �I6/1A Etiauette�lafnrmat,25x67pux�rtaGngatibAe,auet� d�rsPr60(8160 (9�I>7`' 0918/091.90�AAV oane aigitedwoo ww L9 X ww 9Z temoi ap 91janb!t3 09[8/0916®AA�AA 44 9iRjV,�Q';)u JtT8uia8j!§d nbII a 1919/09G98 flany q4M a4QITVdW03 u9/9 Z X„A az4S lar. i 110-183-03 110-183 4 ;110-183- 5 City Of Hunti on Beach City Of untington Beach j jCity Of untington Beach Po Box 190 Po B 190 „Po Bo 190 Huntingt n Beach, CA92648-0190 H tington Beach, CA92648-0190 Hun n 1on Beach,CA92648-0190 110-183-07 110-183i0t, 08 I : 110-183-0 i g City Of Huntton Beach City Ofngton Beach :,City Of ntington Beach Po Box 19 Po Bo 190 Huntin on Beach, CA92648-0190 �Huriyngton Beach, CA92648-0190 Hu in on Beach, CA92648-0190 110-183-10 110-183-11 ; 1110-183-12 City Of H tington Beach City Of ntington Beach j ; 'City Of untington Beach Po Bo 90 Po B 190 .Po B 190 Hun ngton Beach, CA92648-0190 Hu tington Beach,CA92648-0190 !Hu in Beach, CA92648-0190 � . � 110-183-13 j '1/ington ; 110-183- 5 City Of Hun ' gton Beach I ;Cgton Beach ! City 0 untington Beach Po Box 1 P ' Po ox 190 j Hunti on Beach, CA92648-0190 Heach, CA92648-0190 F�iuntington Beach,CA92648-0190 110-183- i i110-183io 1 : �110-183-1 City Of Hun ' gton Beach !City Of 'ngton Beach City Of ntington Beach Po Box 1 I jPo Box I !Po Bo 90 Hunti ton Beach, CA92648-0190 Hun ' gton Beach,CA92648-0190 1Hu ington Beach,CA92648-0190 110-183-19 �110-183-20 110-183- j Maag James RCity Of Hun gton Beach City 0 untington Beach 32371 Alipaz St#83 !Po Box 0 Po ox 190 San Juan Capistrano, CA92675-4146 JHun ' gton Beach, CA92648-0190 i untington Beach, CA92648-0190 110-183-22 "110-183-23 110-183-24 City Of Hunti ton Beach j lCity Of Huntin on Beach -ity Of ntington Beach Po Box 190 IPo Box 19 o B 190 Huntin n Beach, CA92648-0190 I : ;Huntin on Beach, CA92648-0190 ntington Beach, CA92648-0190 (City!110-183-25 �110-184-01 1 AVtington Of Hu ington Beach iCity Of Hun 'non Beach Ciington Beach j Po Box 1 Po Box 0 P lHunti on Beach, CA92648-0190 j .Hu�� gton Beach, CA92648-0190 I HBeach, CA92648-0190 '110-184-03 ; i10-184-04 1 110-1114-0 City Of Hun ' gton Beach ; �LeeDlHsi Hsiang&Chen H j City Ofntington Beach Po Box 8 reamlight Po B 190 (Hunt' gton Beach, CA92648-0190 Irvine, CA92603-4258 ntington Beach,CA92648-0190 110-184-06 110-18;Hof/ington 07 :110-184�Hungton 08 City Of Hun ' gton Beach City Of Beach City Of Beach Po Box Po B 190 Po Bo Hun ' gton Beach, CA92648-0190 untington Beach, CA92648-0190 Hu ington Beach,CA92648-0190 i ' label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/81.'M Liquet&ff ffpt �" i�f� t ���e ��l��$� �60/8160 C��� // —& 09i2/09tg®/any pane agjedwoo ww L9 x ww gZ;ewao}ap 91;anb!t3 09tB/09t5®� �a�� � b�lfl VhY&%j l agj!80 nb113 , g9t8/09[go Nana gjIM alQlli?dwoo„8/9 Z x j 2z1s I,, 110-180-16 110-180- 7 !110-180-18 City Of Huntington each 'City Of untington Beach ; City Of H tington Beach Po Box 190 Po x 190 i ',jPo Bo 90 Huntington Bea ,CA92648-0190 H ntington Beach,CA92648-0190 7ington Beach, CA92648-0190 110-180-19 1110-181-01 !110-181-02 City OfVHuntingt, n Beach 'City Of Hun ' gton Beach City Of Hu ington Beach Po Box Po Box 0 ;Po Bo 90 Huntinh,CA92648-0190 ; Hu ington Beach, CA92648-0190 H tington Beach, CA92648-0190 I � 110-181-03 ;110-181-04 : 1 j110-181-05 City Of Hun ' gton Beach !City Of Hunt' gton Beach ! �DubarThomas Courtney Po Box 1 Po Box 1 {Po Box 1267 I Huntin on Beach, CA92648-0190 i ,Hun ' gton Beach, CA92648-0190 ! Sunset Beach,CA90742-1267 110-181-06 110-181-07 110-181-08 City Of Hun - gton Beach : !City Of Hun gton Beach ; City Of ntington Beach Po Box 19 ; Po Box ; Po B 190 Huntington Beach,CA92648-0190 Hun ' gton Beach, CA92648-0190 ntington Beach, CA92648-0190 110-181-09 ' I110-181-10 j /ntington City Of H tington Beach City Of H ington Beach tington Beach Po Bo 90 Po Bo 90 Huntington Beach,CA92648-0190 Hu ngton Beach, CA92648-0190 Beach, CA92648-0190 110-181-12 410-182-01 i110-182-0 City Of Huntington Beach City Of H tington Beach ! Fity Of H ntington Beach ,Po Bo 90 I 'Po B 190. Po Bo 90 Hu ington Beach,CA92648-0190 ntington Beach,CA92648-0190 Hun ngton Beach, CA92648-0190 110-182-03 110-182-04 /untington Lee Hsi Hsiang&Chen H City Of zri/r gton Beach ; ington Beach 28 Dreamlight j IPo Bo Irvine, CA92603-4258 IHu ington Beach, CA92648-0190 Beach, CA92648-0190 i i I � I110-182-0 j110-182-07 �10-182-08 City Of untington Beach i :, ;City Of Hun ' gton Beach :City Of tington Beach IPo B 190o Box :Po B 190 I �Hu ington Beach,CA92648-0190iu ington Beach, CA92648-0190 ntington Beach, CA92648-0190 110-182-09 110-182-10 �10-182-1 City Of Hu ington Beach �ity Of Hun ' gton Beach ( Bemis R' and C B IPo Box 0 o Box 0 Full on, Hun ' gton Beach, CA92648-0190 Hun ' gton Beach, CA92648-0190 i '110-182-1�ftton 110-183-01 ! :110-183-02 City Of Hu Beach City Of Hun gton Beach j City Of Hu ington Beach 'Po Box 0 ! Po Box Po Bo 0 Huntington Beach, CA92648-0190 Hu ington Beach, CA92648-0190 1 i Hu ngton Beach, CA92648-0190 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible withAvery°5160/81;61'0 EtiNueA f 0900919(D AAAV cane alq!jedwoo ww Lg x ww gZ jewoL op 949nb!I3 09 s , 9918/09Lg®NaAV 411m olglledwoo„8/9 Z X«L azls{a- 110-162-02 110-162-03 110-162-04 City Of Hu ngton Beach Miller John Scott IMiller John Scott Po Box 1 To Box 14 IPo Box 14 Hunti on Beach, CA92648-0190 I Bondurant,WY82922-0014 ' ;Bondurant,WY82922-0014 i 110-162-05 '110-162-06 : :110-162-07 Pack Dave R i 'Pack Dave R ! !City/Htington Beach 9882 Verde Lomas Cir ! 9882 Verde Lomas CirPo Villa Park, CA92861-3126 Villa Park, CA92861-3126 !Huneach,CA92648-0190 i 110-162Ztington 11110-162- !110-162-1 I City Of Beach City Ofntington Beach City Of ntington BeachPo�B490 Po B0 To B 190 Huington Beach, CA92648-0190 IH�ington Beach,CA92648-0190 : Hu ington Beach, CA92648-0190 ! 110-162-1 1 (110-162- 2 i 110-162-13 City Of ntington Beach !City Of ntington Beach City Of ntington Beach ! Po B 190 Po B 190 Po B 190 i Huntington Beach, CA92648-0190 `. �H tington Beach,CA92648-0190 Hu ington Beach, CA92648-0190 j � 1I , 110-162-14 I110-162-1 I : 1110-162-16 . City Of ntington Beach City Of ntington Beach i 'City Of ntington Beach Po B 190 ! Po Bo 190 iPo B 190 H tington Beach, CA92648-0190 Hu ington Beach,CA92648-0190 I !Hu tington Beach,CA92648-0190 I � I 110-162-17 1 110-162-1 �10-162-19 City Of untington Beach !City Of untington Beach j �eeDHsi Hsiang&Chen H 7Htington 190 !Po B 190 8 reamlight Beach, CA92648-0190 I ' jH tington Beach,CA92648-0190 �rvine, CA92603-4258 i 110-162-20 1110-162-21 110-162-22 (City Of ntington Beach Oty Of untington Beach City Of tington Beach Po B 190 !Po B 190 Po B 190 H tington Beach, CA92648-0190 !H tington Beach, CA92648-0190 ntington Beach,CA92648-0190 110-162-23 1110-162- 110-163-01 j !City Of H tington Beach pity Of ntington Beach CityyHuntin ton BeachPo Box 90 �o B 190 Po Hun ' gton Beach, CA92648-0190 H tington Beach, CA92648-0190 j iuch, CA92648-0190 110-163-02 !110-163-0 10-163-04 �ity Of ntington Beach �ity Of ntington Beach City Of Huntington Beach 'Po B 190 o Bo 190 Po Box 190 tington Beach, CA92648-0190 H ington Beach, CA92648-0190 :Huntin n Beach, CA92648-0190 710-16XHtington 110-163-06 I �110-163-07 City Of Beach 1 City Of Hunt' gton Beach �ity Of H tington Beach Po Bo 190 Po Box Po B 190 Hun ington Beach, CA92648-0190 Hu�gton Beach,CA92648-0190 (Huntington Beach, CA92648-0190 / I label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible\1ith Avery 0516 0/81 60 Etig0eti; q forjn*L Z5,r��p,�7,MgjR pRpp n .. dVdWj1*0/8160 09 G8/09 G90 AAAV oane alq!jedwoo ww Lg x ww gZ vewAol ap 9119nb!j3 19= 09 G8/09 Gg®loaAy gllm alglledwoo„8/9 Z x G azls l' I Occupant i0ccupant Occupant 7051 Ellis Avenue,#11 7051 Ellis Avenue, #12 7051 Ellis Avenue,#13 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Occupant j 'Occupant j Occupant 7051 Ellis Avenue,#14 1 ,7051 Ellis Avenue,#15 �7051 Ellis Avenue,#16 1 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 (Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ` iuntington Beach,CA 92648 j i ' `l Occupant !:(Occupant Occupant 7051 Ellis Avenue, #17 ! 7051 Ellis Avenue, #18 I '7051 Ellis Avenue, #19 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ! Huntington Beach,CA 92648 �1 1 ntington Beach,CA 92648 Occupant Occupant j Occupant 7051 Ellis Avenue, #20 7051 Ellis Avenue,#21 7051 Ellis Avenue,#22 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ! antington Beach,CA 92648 j I Occupant Occupant !Occupant 7051 Ellis Avenue, #23 '7051 Ellis Avenue,#24 II7051 Ellis Avenue, #25 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I ; Huntington Beach,CA 92648 �iuntington Beach,CA 92648 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7051 Ellis Avenue, #26 7051 Ellis Avenue,#27 7051 Ellis Avenue, #28 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Puntington Beach,CA 92648 (Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ! I I Occupant !Occupant Qccupant 7051 Ellis Avenue, #29 : '7051 Ellis Avenue, #30 77051 Ellis Avenue, #31 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I Occupant . :Occupant (Occupant 17051 Ellis Avenue, #32 7051 Ellis Avenue, #33 7051 Ellis Avenue, #34 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I untington Beach,CA 92648 Occupant Occupant Occupant 7051 Ellis Avenue, #38 17051 Ellis Avenue,#39 17051 Ellis Avenue,#40 (Huntington Beach, CA 92648 (Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Occuant ' 'Occupant p I ' ' Occupant Pant I 7051 Ellis Avenue, #35 '17051 Ellis Avenue, #36 V051 Ellis Avenue,#37 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 !Huntington Beach,CA 92648 'Huntington Beach,CA 92648 / label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 l Cfiniinttn rin fnrmat 95 m.m.v R7 mm rmmnatihly nv&r AuargP;W0/S160 09 G2109 G9®(aany oane o1ggedwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z 1ewaol ap 91janbij3 0918/0915o9i��� e�lbaa � �ut /��ltloitbli3 0918/0915®Nand ylim elglledwoo„8/9 3 x„G azlS lr too, Eileen Murphy Marianne Huntley I Pave.Sullivan 201 21 Str i 6521 Se�via Circle 4162 N Indsor Drive Huntington Beac A 92648 Huntington Bea h, CA 92647Iuntington Beach,CA 92649 Mindy White IPat acia M. Goodman Larry Gallup 17762'C�a Lane 18531"B 4tley Lane : 3776 Monte Drive Huntington each, CA 92647 Huntington - ach, CA 92648 Huntington Be h, CA 92649 Ralph auer on Genet Bob Detloff 16511t Circle �67 a Angelina Drive 6812=Laurelhurst Huntington Be ch,CA 92649 i ;Huntmgtomkeach, CA 92647 : untinjbk Beach, CA 92647 Candace sch I :(Juana Mueller curd&Janed Sax dt Street 16322(Mantic Circle 17772 Beach�13kd. 60�Huntington Beach-,-CA 92646 �t�g�toeach,CA 92648 iunington'Beach, CA 92649 - � Annette South ^ then Thacher Mark�ixbY 19391 Mauna Lane 0�acArtthiur Blvd., Suite 200 17451 I�l ate Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 �,41 ew , CA 92660 Huntington B aEh, CA 92649 Don cAllister Jule ooper Vic zig 1121 Par eet I 6822 Laurell�urst iI1��7�461 S ine Lane i Huntington Bea 1,CA 92648 Huntington Be h, CA 92647 ' . Huntington ach, CA 92647 Chri�imnces Occupant P.O. 7051 Ellis Avenue,41 Huntington Beac CA 92649 Huntington Beach,CA 9264E Occupant Occupant Occupant 7051 Ellis Avenue,42 ` 17051 Ellis Avenue,#3 051 Ellis Avenue,#4 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ;Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 9264E Occupant I "I Occupant !. (Occupant 7051 Ellis Avenue,45 I ! i7051 Ellis Avenue,46 7� 051 Ellis Avenue, 47 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 jHuntington Beach, CA 92648 ! Huntington Beach, CA 92648 � I I 'Occupant !Occupant J ccupant 7051 Ellis Avenue,48 17051 Ellis Avenue,49 : I7051 Ellis Avenue,410 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 (Huntington Beach, CA 92648 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible wit Avery 05160/ 1;6� f���Ftiniiatta-rip fnrmat 9ri.rn=.Y R7 mna.cmm�atihlt aaiaadlnwxvnQ��fi(1/Ri fi(1 /^f�df �� 09!9/09GS®AAMV oaAz olgliedwoo ww Lq xww 9Z izwioi op 9iianbii3 4 "rl � NVIS01101 .1"TWIV 47 AYSO Region 55 AYSO Region 56 AO Region 117 Commissioner Russ Marlow David Fike I Commisiooer John Almanza 18111 Brentwell Circle 20091 Tranquil Lane 9049 Barfield Ave. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Fountain Vary, CA 92708 ? i 47 ( 47 1 47 j AY KO Region 143 Huntington Beach Jr. All American Huntington Beach Pop Warner Football Da Kuiper ,I Football .1 David Snyder 16033 Bolsa hica#104 Barry Kudlack 5341 Granvill PMB#1 18432 Goodwin Lane l Huntington Beach, CA 92649 l Huntington Beach, C 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 i 47 : I 47 47 Gold Coast Extreme ! North Huntington Beach Futbol Club South Cost BayernFutbol Club Rick Bauer, President President Shereen Walter arissa Pena 20501 Suburbia Lane 1511 Lakeside Lane 22222E yptus Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92646 I I Huntington Beach,CA 92648 ! : Lake FoCA 92630 ` I 47 471 47 Huntington Beouth LaCrosse a Y ! ! Oakview enewal Partnership Fountain Valley Pony Baseball Michael trie Jos odriguez AI_Letua 17761 Misty L ne ! 7850 Slater e, Space 59 14591 Yucca Circle Huntington Beach, C�92649 Huntington BeacCA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 i 47 : ' 47 4T l Huntington Beach Girls Softball Huntington Valley Little League Ocean View Little League Gerry Steele, President l Michael Kircher I Stephanie Green, President 6172 Shelly Dr. 9767 Cornwall Drive 118041 Starmont Lane i Huntington Beach, CA 92647 I Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 47 l 47 ! ;' 4T`I District 62 Challenger Division ! Robinwood Little League i Seaview Little League Gail Harder 1 1 Kathryn Beutel-Luiahel Mailman 17961 Scotia Circle 6551 Rennrick Circle P"O-- ox 5305 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92615 47 47 48 South Huntington Beach Girls Fast Pitch I West County Family YMCA ! Westm ter Village HOA Softball I, Taina Hywen/Aaron Hoisington 5200 Bla pool Road Barry Colbum I� 19891 Beach Blvd.#17 Westminster, A 92683 P.O. Box 7332 i Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92615 49 50 51 Coastkeepers Briggs Law Corporation I Regional ENR mental Officer for Calif Brown :� .'� Attn:Valerie A. Mosqueda Westeon Environ Office 3151 Airwy . Suit a e F-110 99 East"C'Street, Suite 11 US�Force Costa Mesa, 92663 it Upland,CA 91786 333 Market t Suite 625 g San Francisco94105-2196 US Navy Fort Irwin ' Western Region E9Yirnnmental Office She Donovan I Lt Paul D.Cramer I, Patrick Chnstm�n, Director Community Plans iaison Coordinator 'I Director of Pub Works Nat'l Training 7 US Marine Corpsdding 1164 1223 Pacific ighway i' Crttr s Box 55524� San Diego,CA 9 132-5190 PO Box 1 097 Camp Pendleton,CA 92055 5246. Fort Irwin,CA 91310 Fort Hunter-Liggett Mr.Peter Rubin Director of�55th tic Works ��� �� �� Combat Suppo 'Wing Center 79 i A-Dublin,Cs�94568 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/ l:Bfl ` Ei*l t ¢444v 09I9/09IG@ fuaAV oane alglledwoo ww Lq x ww SZ lewaol ap allanb113 080180 sm HB Chamber of Commerce Orange County Assoc.of Realtors Amigos De Bolsa Chica President Dave Stefanides President 19891 Beach Blvd. Ste. 140 25552 La Paz Road P.O. Box 1563 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 j Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ;. I i 4 4 ' , 5 • Sunset Bea Community Assoc. ; it Sunset Sea Local Coastal Program I Huntington Beach Tomorrow Pat Thies, esident Advisory Boar County of Orange President PO Box 2 I P.O. Bo 46 I.;; PO Box 865 Sunset Beach, CA 90 -0215 Sunset Beach,CA 9 42-0746 ! Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I _ 6 7 8 � Building Industry Assoc. of South Calif. SCAG ETI: Corral 100 Attn:Elyse Sminada, Govt.Affairs Asst Ri �712th picer Jean Kimbre[I 17744 Sky Park Circle, Suite 170 818 We Floor 20292 Eastwood Circle Irvine, CA 92614 „ Los Angeles, GA 90017 j Huntington Beach, CA 92646 9 ,I jl 10 11 1 Environmental Board Chair Huntin n Harbor POA Matrix Environmental Robert Smith P.O. ox 791 Attn:Shawn Gauer, Senior Planner 21352 Yarmouth Lane Sunset Beac CA 90742 ! 6701 Center Drive West#900 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 i Los Angeles,CA 90045 i 12 13 14 Rutan& ucker, LLP Newla' House Museum Historic Resources Board Chair Jeffrey M. derman Pres., H.BV fistorical Society Barbara Haynes 611 Anton Blvd., 14th Floor 19820 beach Blvd. 19341 Worchester Lane Costa Mesa, CA 9 26-1950 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 15 ( 16- 16 Council on Aging cliff HOA �i �, act'sff HOA 1706 Orange Ave. I Je etzei j J n Roe Huntington Beach, CA 92648 I 19391 Shady arbor Circle ! 19382 S dale Lane Huntington Beac CA 92648 Huntington Be h, CA 92648 16 16 1 17 Seacliiff HOA Su ohnson fGr en Berg Lo annone f i 19671 Quie Bay Lane 18870[G lira Circle 19821 Ocean lull Circle Huntington Bea CA 92648 Huntington Bea CA 92648 Huntington Beach, A 92648 18 19 . I 19 Pacific Coast Archaeological Society, Inc. O.C.Ping.&Dev.Services Dept. O.C. Resources&Develop. Mgt Dept. ! Attn:Jane Gothoid Director Bryan Speegle P.O. Box 10926 i P.O. Box 4048 P.O.Box 4048 Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 20 21 '1•{ i' 22 City of Costa Mesa i City of Fountain Valley { City of Newport Beach Planning Director ' Planning Director Planning Director P.O.Box 1200 10200 Stater Ave. P.O.Box 1768 Costa Mesa,CA 92628-1200 Fountain Valley,CA 92708 ':,; Newport Beach,CA 92663-8915 23. ' i 24" ', f 25* . City of Westminster i i City of Seat Beach ! California astal Commission Planning Director Planning Director i ! There Henry 8200 Westminster Blvd. 211.Eighth St. South•Coast rea Office Westminster, CA 92683 Seat Beach, CA 90740 f 200 Oceangate, Oth Floor Long Beach, CA 92"02 cl—�j ba label size V x 2 5/8"compatible with-Aver--y°5160/$760 �t, ,, ��2t Wont rmm�tiG Zmct r�mantuhlwai -0mc�vo�t71 Rfl/Ri Rfl 091-8/0919®A)GAd oaAP aigijedwoo ww zq x ww 9Z;Lw)oi op 91janbq] 09 LS/09 G9®(uaAd y}!m a!q!jedwoo<,9/9 Z x«�azis!P�^ o _I 28 Department of Transportation,Dist 12 Local Solid Waste Enf.Agy. H7New on Beach Post Office Chns her Herre,Branch Chief O.C.Health Care Agency owtCoordinator 3337 lson Dr., Suite 380 Director 1 arner Ave. hvine,C 612-1699 P.O. ox 355 Hon B CA 92647 Santa Ana, 92702 29 30 30 Fountain Valley Elem. School Dist BB City Elementary School Dist BB City Elementary School Dist Marc Ecker Kathy Kessler,Superintendent David Perry 10055 Slater Avenue 20451 Craimer Lane 20451 Craimer Lane Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Burlington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 j i 31 '32 33 . Ocean View Elem.School Disk Westminster School District BB Union High School District Attn: Cindy Pulfer,Admin. Services Clark Hampton Stephen Ritter 17200 Pinehurst Lane 14121 Cedanvood Avenue 5832 Bolsa Avenue Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Westminster,CA 92683 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 34 35- 36 Cannery ton Properties,LLC nest College OC County Harbors,Beach&Parks Dept Ascon Landfill c/o Tamara Zeier Arta red Owens P.O.Box 4048 One Pointe Dn , Suite 320 15744 Go nest St Santa Ana,CA 92702-4048 Brea,CA 9 1 Huntington Beac CA 92647 37 39 ella Terra Mall Country View Estates BOA Country View Estates HOA Attn: Rogers-Laude Carrie Thomas Gerald Chapman. 7 777 er Ave.4300 ! 6642 Trotter Drive 6742 Shire Circle Huntington B CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92648 39 39' 40 Meadowlark Area dowlark Area de Homes Sally Graham CIt rownmg 6 Exe Circle, Suite 250 516 Eg,CA Circle 16771 Roos elt Lane ! Irvine, 926I4 Huntington B 92649 Huntington Beach, A 92649 41 41 42 BolsNBe d Trust Balsa 'ca Land Trust OC Sanitation District 5200 Wue,Ste. 108 Evan Be ,.President 10844 Ellis Avenue HuntinCA 92649 1812 Port Place Fountain Valley,CA 92708 Newport Beach, A 92660 42, ! 42 4`2 AES Huntington Beach,LLC Ric\ y John Ely Eric P `graft,Plant Manager 9062 Kahulm rive 22102 kport Lane 21730 Street Huntington Beach, 92646 Huntington B h,CA 92646 Huntington B.1and A 92646 _ 43 44 ::; 45 BBNE. Avenue ities Assoc. Downtown ess Association Downtownesiderts Association o Mr Steve aniels Ms. St Germain 200 Main S #106 505 bama 865 Huntington Beach, A 92648 Huntington B h,CA 92648 46 46 47 Gabrieleno/Tongva Tribal Council Juaneno Band of Mission lndians AYSO Region 55 ' Chairperson Acjachemen Nation Commissioner Russ Marlow PO Box 693 31411 La Matanza Street 18111 Brentwell Circle San Gabriel,CA 91778 I„ San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675-2625 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 l/- label size 1"x-2 5/8"compatible with Avery°5160/8160 el116 Ftinaiattot&ktrmrntt 60 09 L8/09 G5®Aaany Dane alggedwoo ww L9 x ww 5Z lewjoj a 911anblj3 09 L8/09 G5®A]GAV ullnn algl}edwoo„g/5 Z x<<i.azls lagel an John&Theresa Morello Amparo Buitrago Michael Ames 17322 Goldenwest St. 17302 Goldenwest St. 17332 Goldenwest St. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Scott Peterson John&Martha Bergman Candy Richardson 17342 Goldenwest St. 17352 Goldenwest St. 17292 Goldenwest St. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17322 Goldenwest St. 17302 Goldenwest St. 17332 Goldenwest St. Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17342 Goldenwest St. 17352 Goldenwest St. 17292 Goldenwest St. Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Eileen Murphy Nancy Donovan Norma Mannion 205 215t St. 4832 Los Patos 6782 Spickard Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Trevor Dodson Tim Geddes Robert Franklin Fuscoe Engineering 21802 Windsong Circle PO Box 1171 16795 Von Karman ste. 100 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach,CA 92647 Irvine, CA 92606 Kelly McCarty Melissa McCready Janed Sax 5582 Serene Drive 6902 Rio Vista Drive 16322 Niantic Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 /A label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 ° Cfinnoffn rla fnrmn+9;mm v A7 mm rmmni+ihla avar,want®F1RNR1R0 091-8/091-9®1Uany o9Al2 aigg,2dwoo ww Lg x ww 9Z 1,2wnj ep ajAanblj3 on 09 R2/09 G90 4aany ql!m eigl1,2tlwoo„8/9 Z x j ezis i9q,2l Eileen Murphy Marianne Huntley Dave Sullivan 201 21" Street 6521 Segovia Circle 4162 Windsor Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Mindy White Patricia M. Goodman Larry Gallup 17762 Carranza Lane 18531 Bentley Lane 3776 Montego Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Ralph Bauer Don Genet Bob Detloff 16511 Cotait Circle 6751 Via Angelina Drive 6812 Laurelhurst Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Candace Bartsch Juana Mueller Richard&Janed Sax 17772 Beach Blvd. 603 215t Street 16322 Niantic Circle Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach,CA 92649 Mark C. Allen III Annette South Law Offices of Mark C. Allen APC 19391 Mauna Lane 13950 Cerritos Corporate Dr., Ste. A Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Cerritos, CA 90703 Jim Bartel CA Department of Fish and Game U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4949 Viewridge Avenue Jules Hooper 6010 Hidden Valley Road San Diego, CA 92123 6822 Laurelhurst Carlsbad, CA 92009 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Christine Wilkes Don MacAllister Vic Leipzig P.O. Box 2404 1121 Park Street 17461 Skyline Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Tony Brine Andrzej M. Podolak Guy Stivers 17882 Carranza Lane 6151 Palisade Dr. Stivers&Associates Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 160 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Renee Brown Velda King Pat Kreamer 7221 Mission Glen#310 18111 Lakepoint Lane 18111 Lakepoint Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Mary Jo Baretich Tom Livengood Mark C. Allen, III 21752 Pacific Coast Highway, #23A 5461 Meadowlark Claremont Land Group Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 250 West First Street, Suite 330 Claremont, CA 91711 label size 1"x 2 5/8"compatible with Avery 05160/8160 � //_� / �H Ftinciatta rip fnrmat 95 ati mm v R7 mm rmm� hla avar.Avary @5iRNRiRn T`� All SUM ;g",v ---—-------- jtp 171' sR 'K�' n .............. 001 now,o"ispook(PS,SM, ---------------..................... 77 =0V Tom '0 own lz si. y -W-W W-V PROW V=7 NJ enk v . v-07 S, its -lot W 1, LIA M too" SW -1 FE MID s AF111"I'll MY',= "W", TVs MOO -0 �s BiYEId that on lylagday Ay "NOT not 0 , -"o' aim fee Mon. low AL top! , 3 a IBM Itt MW A A .�IIOOMW' COMWAO" WWJ4 7i...... 'CW61 g 6fAHtmtid to Se € as a vow, P COW En' *tWrmMbfl-. "(eEQA the ;tiia�rcataan,>ends won, Cam 1ttiep�Ciea -- approorp Printed by 0802 PeMcia Gan►Ino Mar12,12 24 prn Salesperson: x. Phone: Ad#3492B164 operate up to a 45,000 square foot one-story senior recreation facility on a site with a grade difference greater than 3 feet. The 5-acre project site is located within the 343-acre Huntington Central Park and generally located southwest of the inter- section of Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue, between the disc golf course, which is at a higher elevation, and the Shipley Nature Center. The senior center site would com- prise up to a 45,000 square foot senior center facility, a 227- space parking lot with spaces for City vehicles and shuttle buses, and an outdoor open space area.EIR No.07-002 and CUP No. 07-039 were initially approved by the City Council in 2008,but subsequent legal chal- lenges set-aside the approvals necessitating a new approval process. General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 is necessary to comply with the court ruling on the previous senior center CUP and EIR approvals. No changes to the previ- ously approved facility are proposed with re- spect to site layout, floor plan or architec- tural design. Location: 18041 Goldenwest Street (5-acre site located southwest of the inter- section of Talbert Ave- nue and Goldenwest Street)Project Planner, Jennifer Villasenor NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Plan- ning and Building De- partment, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection by contacting the Depart- ment, or telephoning (714)536-5271. ON FILE, A copy of the proposed request is on file in the Planning and Building Department, 2000 Main Street, Hun- tington Beach,California 92848, for inspection by the public.A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday,April 12,2012. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or ___ ad proof pg.2 --- -,rmmb 4tpii A A PrIl 7 or V 5n Fg -0 ic tv "f -:Ak ce I �4 Olift`V�l-at-" -Jq Ay, -4,-,A yal admtn'un j WF* . ....... -vk Y Z, kn Hwy EFF,41 -S-W Will 44' .7'l NOTI(E OF F'UBUC HEWNG BEFORE TI1E,WW' OON(I! 06 THE CRY OF HUNTINGTON�� BUG NOTICE"IS:HEREBY,-GIV.- ® F that;,-on Monday,:, April , Aprii 16,E=2012 at��6 QO••" PR OF 'p m in the City Eouncil sChambers, MOj,'!Main StreePUBL'C� beach T'ON Beach ,- Hyrrtingtnn , the City Council- will hold.a-public hear- ing won:" the°.follawing planning:"?and zoning,, item_.: 'I,. G E N E'RrA,I. P L.A'N ANIENDNfiENT"NO_'VI STATE OF CALIFORNIA) 004°AND APPEAAI&F' PLANNING- {OIN'i1N15_ SIOM S APPROVAL`.,: ss. SUBSEQUENT':-EN.VL RONMEN_TAL IMP.AtT COUNTY OF ORANGE REPORT NQ.;�m=NALU 2 AND-CONDITIONAL-USE PERNflIT..NO,O7-034(R)' {HONTINGTON Z BEACH S E N T 0.Rrv=',t;E AtsT E R PROJECT):_rAPpeHant: am a citizen of the United States and a Council'.Member. Connie Boardman (Applicant* resident of the County of Los Angeles; I City aof Hgntingtoq Beach:-.Pioporty--Owrr- am over the age of eighteen years, and °e►e; City-of-Huntingt6W, -Beach"Request:-Subiii not a party to or interested in the notice quen+ E,R Na."o7-Dos:. analyzes`rrrthe potential published. I am a principal clerk of the adverse:-;_1environmental impacts:associated with H U N T I N G TO N BEACH the se'mor center project in accordance with the INDEPENDENT, which was adjudged a California Environmental Quality_;Act-_:_.(CEQAy�: newspaper of general circulation on .GPA._:No:-,°a'r=Ob4'�46 volves,incoiporating the September 29, 1961, case A6214, and Centr4V',`,Park...Master Plan into,the_Recreation June 11 , 1963, case A24831, for the and Community-Services, 'Element.of the General`' City of Huntington Beach, County of Plan ana'. updating,the: :Central, Park Master Orange, and the State of California. ;Plan of uses to changd Attached to this Affidavit is a true and -sie_5-bore-senior`cenity;' `site from-a=loavamtensity� to high intensity-T.ecrea'-., complete copy as was printed and AiGn area'-t acc nima- m date the-seor4ce`nter'.. published on the following date(s): developmenta,4` Rr„N0.. OT-034(Rj''iepresents a- request;-`toq'.00nstruct Thursday, Aril 5 2012 and opeiate,up to - Y9 p e 45,000'square'foot one-' story,-°senior recreation facility'on a site-withf`a. -grade_difference`greater thaw 3 feet::,Tfie'5-acre- certif or declare under penaltywiotit� itg`zi Z� _&e wit#tin the��.3�3;'-=bore' Y ,Huntingtoiif�Centrai'Park 4n4;''ge`6eraIIy- located - of perjury that the foregoing is true sikh*est,of the inter- and correct. 41er sect i°"`�"'of,xnwest Street;atttl`Talbert Ave- pue`_�fietWeen the disc golf course, which-is,:ate a.,,higher elevation-4nd: Ahe`;Shipley Nature C'en T.he�=senior--center-, site 'would comprise u- Executed on April 11 , 2012 to a 45;000 squarefo'ot" senior center.facility,.;a at Los Angeles California withspac es,for,,C4 vet � witfi'-spaces.for�.0 ve- 'hicle"s^aiid'shuttle buses, and.0arr'outdoor open: Ispace.,area. EIR__No.07=' 1002:°and-CUP Nos 07-039_ were;;•,initially=-approved b�yye`City Council in`2008;but subsequent fe J� � J Sal challenges sgtaside. , the approvals,:necessr f tat ing a rrew;*approval; Signature process:.tG'eneraly;Plan' Amendment='No:' 1'1=004 its";necessa'ry.to comply-- fvuith the:"court ruling: on the„previous senior-cen-- ter„',CUP,'and:_EIR.:-ap=- provals.:No changes-to- -the,previously approved: facility ,.are proposed _Huth"respect to:site;lay-,. out,__floor.planor-archi tecturadesign >Loia� tion ,1 8041 Goldenwest `Street (5-acre site lo- .cated-'southwest_.of the 'intersection-of Talbert_ Avenue and Goldenwest Street)- -Protect `Plcn- EN,that,Sul sequ6nt1ri vir6iunental. Impact Re- _ port 'No'07-002'-is on file ai-the City-of-Hun- tington Beach-Planning ; and,- Building;"-D°epat-' ment;`2000-Main Street,, and'is'available for pub-- tic-;inspection."'by' con- 'aacting°the Oepartiment,_ '.or.',_tel' honing f714) 536-5271.` ON.FILEc.A:copy of."the' proposed reguest,is-on file:in,,fhe;Plamm�g.and Bu ilding,.,,,Department;' 2000 Main,Street;;-Hun tingtoo"Beach;<sCalifor nia.92648, for--inspec- aion,.by---the public.-A copy of the staff report; will be available. to,-A7, terested--parties-at the:{ .City_Clerk s Office' on. Thursday;``''Aprif`"''12;:'' 2012. , ALL,INTERESTED'""PER--` SON&are,invited to at- tend'"said;;!,hearing.L and - express`opinions"or sub-;r mit.-evidencC° for'.,or "against,ttie.,application `as outlined above If you challenge,the City-Coun-. cil's action,in;court,'yo',` may;be limited;'-to<tais� ing.,.only,-„'those issues y`oj-. ,'someone .else raise"tl at_'Ahex?'public hearing-described in.this notice,or in written cor-. respondence- delivered„ to the City at, or prior' to,the public_hearing:-If„ .there are`:anyt;further, q uesti ons.,p lea se'sca li',th e' Planning;::'and.,,Building_ bepartment at Q1.4}_ 536-5271 and refer`to the'above,,items-Direct your.-written. communi-_ cations':"to the__City -Clerk.`-: _ - Joan L:Flynn,City Clerk' City of Huntington each 2000 Main.Street;,2nd,'°' Floor `" H untington each, _California 92648`Y 714-536-5227- Zbl ished H.B 'Indepen- / dent April 5 2012 a" NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNM,.'; CITY OF HUHNGTON NOTICE IS HEREBY, GIV. EN that on Mond ill a Ir"ROOW OFApnl he Cit at ricil, °p.m in'the-City Councih Chambers,- 2000_..Main PUBLICATI Street; "'Cit 'ngton 'Beach;",the"City Council. i'_w,ill,hold:a_public hear ring" on the-following j_planning,:mand Z'bning items:" G;E N`E,R A L P L AN AAIMENDMENT;>NO_ I-. STATE Off' CALIFORNIA) PLANNINANDG. COM OF PLANNING.'COMEIIIS- SION:: S -APPROVAL SUBSEQUENT-r;ENVI- � oo ) SS. RONMENTAL-,--IMPACT ®�J N �y Y ®� ORANGE ) REPORT_NO:,;:,07-00 ,AND,CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT`NO:07-039(R) (HEUNTINGTON,.;;BEACH` SNIOR CiERT=ER, PROJECT). Appel iri#,'' am a citizen of the United States and a Council Member wont: "Boaardman Appllcdnte resident of the Count of Los Angeles; I Bea at porn"gtq" Y g � Beach. Property;Own- am over the age of eighteen years and ee city of st: S"ggton � each,, uest:�So6se- quent,-'EIR Na.- -002 not a party to or interested in the notice tanalyzes ;the- potential published. I am a principal clerk of the adverse environmental A cipacts:associated-with H U NT I N GTO N BEACH the se o,rdan riferiproject in accordance witfic the i INDEPENDENT which was adjudged a California E"nvironniental i � g -Quality,'Act newspaper of general circulation on GPA Noy 1L004'th g irtilves mcorporatingthe. September 29 1961 case A6214 and central. Park Master r , i Plan into the Recreation June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the Ei meet of the`sin jai; Cityof Huntington Beach Count of Plan and updatings* g Y Central Park �"Master,;; Plan of Uses to:'change: Orange, and the " State of California. the 6-acre senior ' 'center Attached to this Affidavit is a true and .,site-from tensit:ii,te"city �to:,high�intensity-recrea= � do""area,tu=accg; mm -complete copy as was printed and date-. he�seiior"cente,' � development.___CUP No. published on the following date(s): --07-039(R)-repiresents a request_=-'to:`'construct Thursday, April 5, 2012 and operate up to:a 45,000.square faot ctne-.; -Story s',ni6r,4 i' tibw facility aon a sitei;With`a grade differenceygreater than,1 feei:'The 5-acre project'site is-located within the--343;acre I certify (or declare) under penalty Huntington Central Park, and generally -located of perjury that the foregoing is true southwest oVthii inter section of Goldenwest and correct. Street and-Talbert Ave nue,,between"the ;tlisc golf course„, ich.'is'at a:"highe�<elevation;'and the`,, ipley'Nature Cen- ter. The senior- center, site would,compn`serup Executed on April 11 2012 s for centerfarlity,t , senior center facility,°a . 227-space -parkjni lot:' at Los Angeles, California with spaces for City;ver hicles and'shuttle bu`ses;,e and:k,an outdoor""open, space�areai EIR::N0':07 -002,and:CUP„4No;'07-039' ;wem,,,itially`approved by'the'-City Council in 2008,but subsequent le- gal,challenges set-aside " Ajl,A the. .approvals_ necnecesi- si- tating a new approval-_ Signature process.,-General:.Plan g Amendment N6;''ih-004'- is-ne'cessaryi, a. cornply with,the"courVruling'on the previous senior cen- ter..CUP., an'd-,EIR.�<ap-,' provais.,'No,.changes to the previously approved ' facility are- proposed ' with trespect to site lay- out'floor plan-or archi- teciural`adesign:';,Lo= .tione`e�1804T'Goldenbws"t Street,-(5-acre site lo- cated southwest-of the ,intersection `of Talbert ,Avenue.and"Goldemvest: =Street)'; Project:, Pluri- EN,thaEsSutisequent,En M' ron,m e;ntsF,rnp'actRe Noa oport ;' Mile'atthe°City"0f;,H,unn ;;., i tingt66'Bdach,"J fanning.j and,";Building.SDepact'', ment,?2000':Mam_Stre'et„` ':antl�is,_availablefo`r�pub;=M'� >lic iinspectiori�',;bY- con-;:� ',t`acting`tfte�;pepa[tment,__, 'br��teliiptidnirig;;;(7.Y4)M1 OPt FILE!;A`copyl of_thee; 'pioposed-request v on, rile m the;Plamm�g andt Buil'ding`.',„'Department;;; 2000;`Main,`1Street`Hun:[', tington"'.Beacti`:'Califoe 'riia;''92648;j for"'�,,mspec,=:'I Lion by"tfie pubhc�:'R,� copy,of.,the staff.,report_' will;,he"°available":;to;in=',s ,terested''pacties;'.at,tf!e ', City;,,Cierk's;M1 Off,ice;;:;on;,'. �ihursday Apnl .'12;`i ALL INTERESTED PER;, iSOf�S are;;invited,to`at:. tend';said'r',tiearing and express opin,ions;orsub= 'against'%:tfi`e;-application,� °is!outnned,abbm If„yoii challenge;the„City,, n: ciR's"action;in;court rrfay`,be:,limited"to;:rais_ ring Fiosert,'.s"sues' ',you,=br_someone,.else' hearing?de`scribed'in'this,. `notice,,.;ot:in;�written£.cor';'. respondence,.`;„;d,'eliveieift to_the,,City"at; or.,prioc 'to'the-public_.,hearing..,lt; theFe';;a%e,„�any; fuitfiei, -questions please call the_ :Plamm�g�and Building, lDepartment,.at `'(71w4,). :536;5271.,;and;;'refei;�to. the:abiive,items.,;D'i�ect ;:your-:wiitteri;�cofimuni-: cationsn�-fo` the�'"Crty; ''Joan L;'Fly"',nn;,City:Clerk City of,Hintington.""Beach, `-°i2000Mam=Street,2nd';: ;Floor- a>, Huntingtori.Beach,,; alifornia'92648 7,14 536 522 =Pubhshed:=.H.B:"Ihdepen- dent,April,5;,2012: COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED REGARDING AGENDA ITEM: Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 07-002, General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07-039(R) Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval for the Huntington Beach Senior Center Project February 15, 2012 Oear City Council members: My name is Eileen Murphy. I am 96 years old and love Seniors. I am writing you to urge you to stop this senior Community center proposed to be built in a passive park. My reasons are: 1. A lawsuit has been heard and the judge decided the appellant was right on all but one count. Because the City delayed action, his suit had statute of limitations on the filing on one claim. 2. The proposed Senior Center is planned with a bigger footprint than the project included. 3. We need a new Senior Center on the some site as the present antiquated center there now. This was donated to the city zoned already for a senior Center and is adequate for a nice two or three story building which is allowed at this site. 4. As a Senior, I know the Goldenest Talbert site is inappropriate for seniors. It is in a hole with a steep grade to walk up to reach Goldenwest. The street's signal does not allow enough time for seniors with books and a walker to get across the street. Then there is a long walk downhill and uphill to the Library entrance. A return trip with books back to the center is a killer of a task. 6. The Senior Center does not need ballrooms for bar mitzvahs or wedding receptions. It is located in a passive park with nesting birds which don't need lights, music, cars parking and noises late into the nights and all day. 7. City should lease one of the unused schools for five years. Move the whole operation at 17th street center staff, programs and bused in seniors for the catered lunches now served. as they do now. 8. New center should be built after the old center is demolished. Three story new center with exercise rooms, ballroom for the monthly Senior Square dancing, step dancing and all the classes now being conducted at old center. 9. The 17th location is centrally located. The new center has no walking neighbors. Seniors gradually do not drive so a neighborhood Senior Center is preferred. I personally have attended old center classes and they are too small rooms and crowded. My grandson who texts would tell me this is TMI (too much information) but I feel this should be said. Respectfully, Eileen Murphy 201 21 st Street HB CA 92648 Esparza, Patty From: Stephenson, Johanna Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 8:39 AM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: FW: PLEASE SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW SENIOR CENTER Attachments: NEW HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER.docx Is the Senior Center on the Agenda for tonight? I can't remember... Johanna Stephenson I Executive Assistant I City of Huntington Beach 1 0: 714.536.5575 Johanna.sephenson@surfcitV-hb.or� From: J D Miles [mailto:jdmiles@socal.rr.com] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 3:03 PM To: Shaw, Joe Cc: Stephenson, Johanna Subject: PLEASE SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW SENIOR CENTER Council Member Shaw, Please support the citizens vote for the construction of the new Senior Center in Central Park. John Miles 19316 Wingedfoot Huntington Beach 1 NEW HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER In November 2006,the voters of Huntington Beach approved for the construction of a new senior center to be build in Huntington Central Park. But a minority group, which did not like the outcome of the vote, filed an appeal to stop the process. The Appeals Court ruled against this minority group and said that the City of Huntington Beach could go ahead and construct the senior center in Central Park. The Court also upheld the vote of the people which allowed the new senior center to be built in Central Park. It should be noted that each appeal on this project, by this minority group, was not paid for by the group but by the tax payers of Huntington Beach. Each appeal wasted City money out of the General Fund that could have been used for other City projects. The new senior center is necessary to continue as a focal point for programs and services that are important to the quality of life to these senior citizens in our city. The time has come to end the 5 year battle with this minority group,which lost the vote, and build the senior center for our seniors who make up 60%of Huntington Beach's population. The yes voters,the majority, for the new senior center have spoken through the democratic process and now want the City Council to build a new senior center in Central Park. April 7, 2012 City of Huntington Beach Planning and Building Department ATTN:Jennifer Villasenor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Senior Center General Plan Amendment No. 11-004 and Conditional Use Permit No. 07- 939(R) Dear Ms. Villasenor, The purpose of this letter is to express my concerns as a private resident of Huntington Beach regarding the senior center project. I am speaking for nobody other than myself. This project does not comply with the HBZSO 213.06 land use controls for OS-PR subdistricts. That code section lists the following permitted OS-PR use classifications and notes that "Use classifications that are not listed are prohibited": • Public and Semipublic o Park& Recreation Facilities o Utilities, Minor • Commercial Uses o Animal Sales and Services— Equestrian Centers o Commercial Recreation and Entertainment o Communication Facilities o Eating& Drinking Establishments With Take-Out Service, Limited (only as an ancillary use that is compatible with and part of a park or recreational facility; only as a take-out service establishment, where patrons order and pay for their food at a counter or window before it is consumed and may either pick up or be served such food at a table or take it off-site for consumption) o Vehicle/ Equipment Sales and Services—Commercial Parking Facility • Accessory Uses (limited to facilities incidental to an open space use) o Accessory Uses and Structures • Temporary Uses o Animal Shows o Circuses and Carnivals o Commercial Filming The senior center at Central Park is intended to perform all of the services (and then some) of the existing Michael E. Rodgers Seniors' Center and the adjacent Seniors Outreach Center. These services include the following items (listed on the city web site at http://www.huntinptonbeachca.pov/residents/human services/senior services.cfm) that are prohibited uses in OS-PR subdistricts per the default exclusionary language of HBZSO 213.06: • AARP Volunteer Income Tax Assistance • AARP 55 Alive Safe Driving Course • Autumn Health Fair& Flu Shot Clinic • Blood Pressure Clinic • Preventative Healthcare for the Aging Program • Financial Planning Consultation • HEAP—Home Energy Assistance Program • HICAP Health Insurance Counseling Program • Homeowners & Renters Assistance Program • Legal Counseling • Notary Services • Telephone Service • Utility Tax Exemption • USDA Food Commodities Program • Care Management works with seniors, families, and caregivers to provide support services, education about senior services, emotional support during times of need and individualized care plan development. • Meals to the Home provides three meals per day to qualified seniors. • Transportation "Seniors on the Go" provides door-to-door service to medical appointments, shopping centers, Rodgers Seniors Center and any other reason within Huntington Beach. Escorts are available for those needing extra assistance. • At Risk Senior Program • CHERISH, Community Helpers Engaged in Restoring and Improving Seniors' Homes • College Internships • Daily Care Call Program • Durable Equipment Lending Service • Emergency Grocery Certificates • Friendly Visitors • Holiday Meals • Information and referral to a variety of resources • Needs and strengths assessment • Senior advocacy • Surf City Senior Providers network These are all worthy services that can make a real difference in the lives of seniors. My own 85- year-old father utilizes some of these services through the Newport Beach Oasis Senior Center. Senior center proponents have been driving the point home for years that these are core services rather than ancillary services. Yet none of these core services are permitted in OS-PR districts such as Central Park according to HBZSO 213.06. This project simply does not comply with the HBZSO, and as such must be denied as submitted. Sincerely, X&�k D' gzvl�/ Mark D. Bixby 17451 Hillgate Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92649-4707 714-625-0876 mark bixby.org Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 6:23 PM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10869 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Agenda& Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: Bob Watts Description: For Apr 16, '12 agenda item. I want to report& oppose the attempt of RSC staff handing out pink slip flyers they made+a mailer to City Hall in favor of& trying to talk last . Fridays Movie audience into voting for a new senior center in the park once again by showing up in force next Mon night. There's a bunch of us active seniors there, not tree- huggers, who don't want or need a "New" Senior Center in HB & like our current ocean- view one just like it is. We don't need A/C, more heat or new toilets. What we do need is the carpet shampood or replaced, an open PC Lab for end-users & less city staff in the afternoons M-F when it's mostly empty inside & out in back parking lot after lunch.IF you wanna talk about an additional senior center somewhere in HB then, IF the money is there now, we can do that maybe but we don't need or want a replaceme nt to our current RSC at 17th& Orange Sts. Most of the hateful old people I've met there don't deserve a nice new one anyway. Expected Close Date: 04/10/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. 1 TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEVI;' SENIOR CENTER I SUPPO;�T TIDE EN'V1ROiNTN4ENT.AL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT.A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLD NA EST AND .ALRERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACff SIGNATURE_ DATE4-_i�- O f Z- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS i AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SLJPPOPIT A NEW' SENIOR CENTER 0 I SUPPORT THE+l'i VIRONMEN T AL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) • I SUPP()R-T A SENTIOR CENTER AT' THE GOLDE'vWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CI'rlZI�;`dS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE {- 'v2 TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A P SIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOVVfNG STATE- MENTS: • I STUPPOR r A Ni:E'VY' SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE re,1NVIRC►h+' IENTAL IMPAC I RE:POIrf (EIR) I S 4"PORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLLENWE.ST.'-',ND TALBERT LOC,'\.TION1 VOTED ON Bti THE klilrIZENS OF HUNTINGTOi4 BEACH SIGNATURE- �/U C4 Q lj DATE -- - �/ TO ALL OF THIS HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ' Asti! A RESIDENT OF TILE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I ACRE i✓ WITHH TTIE FOLLOWING S T A TE- MENTS: 4 SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER d' I tlJ��f��,�•{T HE E Y,IRGI I'vU�'N FAL 1�. M.L AC 'REPOR L (ETR) S1JF`I OR T A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOr DENWEST AND TALBERT L OCA TIO'N V01"ED ON BY THE t'[TIZ E.NS OF HUNTENGTOT BEACH DATE — P TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I ANT A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I :AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: t SUPPORT A NF V SENIOR CENTER a iUPPOR.T HE ENVIROIiIIET;TAL IMPACT RLPOR'L (Elii) I SUPPORT A. `3ENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDE'NVbBST AND TALBEIRT LOCATION VOTED ON BY'►IT i I E:NiS OF flUNTINGIPON BEACH SIGNATURE— �i . �� -- — —DATE- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- NJ_ENTS: IV I St,PPOR"r A N4T'W SE,Nl(JR C'ENTTER e I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENT.pL, INIPACT REPORT(t,ilP) .31 T St. PPOR:I' A SEIIIIOR CENTER AT i L[tJ ZsOLDL NW EST AN L) TALBERT L OCATIO;N VOTED ON BY T}IE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE-. DA:i E l"_ SI,�- Tf) ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ? A:ti1 A RESIDENT OF THE CF.T Y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH A-ND I Ai fREE.. WITH THE FOLI.•01i'II�G STATE-- MINTS: .3 I Sl_�PPOIRT A NF':W 'ENIOR CENTER u. , I �)I SUPPORT TRI-E E VI.tONMENTAL IrvIPACT R_EPOR'I (FIR) m I SI_JPPOlRT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWES'I' r3.ND 'FAI.BER'I' T-GCAT[ON -VOTED tDIN B TI--L ' CITIZENS OF i l..,-.TTINGTON BEACH t< r SIGNATURE _ _ / DAT ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS �M A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- ENTS: `�- I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH [GNATURE ��- �' DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTIN`sTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS �,rr� r �l�nrr rin'�rTT rrrr rr�r r i�czrr- r� c7m mr. I ANl A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HJNTINGION B;=,ACH A A IS;L-;P q-i4A NEW SENIOR CENTER AIJ L Ll,'F- 2')O✓VO7 ✓I✓�Z'✓ 14 aJ'✓' T IS� FBE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RhPOR.T (EIR) A10-r T F, ST A T 7 ; r�C N VOTED ON BY THE ® t-^ A SENIOR CENTER AT TiI� tTOLDE?�i`�rE�1 :.1`1D .,_r�_.I� .RI' L^ �ATI�.) X CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ����• � �� �®/!'W c1� �nC� �.���- SIG N NTURE TO All, OF THE HUNTINGTON TEACH CfrY COUNCIL MEMBERS T AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITE" OAF HUNTTNGTON BEACH A;\ID I AGREE WTTTI THE FOI I_-OVVI"�G `ETA'J(T, MF,NTS: �I S11 'I�ORT A 1,£'W S NIOR CENTER ff'-77)I SUPPORT I'14 E LNVlRON",IENTAI_ I?APACT Pa POR1 (1-`JR) S:}: k A"T� Tx-fE (10!, F-'NWf;S; A'\[D 'i',kl,BER�I' [ ')CATION, VOTED ONI�o' i'I►1 C'.ITIZI :nr� t?1 i1I .\1TIivGTOiN BEACH SI(TNATURF,_— - -- — _-- DATE /�/ TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: / �t IL4 0 AWAU,o-- , - I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER O I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) - 9 I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE \�'� L DATE '' o2D /2 April 11, 2012 SUPPLEMENTAL ENTAL cOMMUNICATION Jennifer Villasenor, Associate Planner City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Aganda Item ° Re: Huntington Beach Senior Center Project Draft Subsequent EIR (DSEIR) No. 07-002 Dear Ms Villasenor, This letter addresses several significant environmental impacts directly related to the placement of a Senior Center in the original proposed location in Central Park. My comments below address disastrous impacts on our local wildlife and neighborhood, referring to noise and lights, and other issues. There are many negatives associated with the proposed site, including a serious elevation difference between where the new senior center is proposed and Goldenwest Street- approximately 15 feet. Seniors will have a hard time walking up that slope. Those with wheelchairs and walkers, and of course anyone needing oxygen tanks, cannot take a leisurely walk to the Library (as publicized), let alone having time to cross the street. Also, designing only 227 parking spaces does not make sense when the existing senior center has around 160 spaces already, plus ample street parking. Re- designing Rodgers Senior Center with underground parking and possibly in a Mediterranean motif to blend with the surround homes is the best choice. Section 4.3-18 Wildlife . As proposed in the Central Park location, this Senior Center project will have significant environmental impacts on the migratory and resident birds, and raptors, which use Central Park as their nesting and foraging grounds, and on the neighboring homeowners. These impact were not adequately addressed with facts in the Draft Environmental Impact Report. The burrowing owl, a State Species of Concern, was identified as potentially occurring within the project site. Given the regional rarity of this species, direct or indirect impacts to this species would constitute a substantial adverse impact to species that meets the definition of Sections 15380 (b), (c), or (d) of the CEQA guidelines, which is considered a significant impact. This project could result in the direct loss of a . sensitive species, the permanent habitat loss including loss of foraging, nesting, or refuge, impair essential behavioral activities, such as breeding, feeding, or shelter/refuge, displacement of wildlife by construction activities, and displacement of wildlife by construction activities. MM4.3-1 and MM4.3-2, and project requirement PR4.3-1. The drastic mitigation measures suggested and outlined by the DSEIR are designed to intimidate and eliminate any Burrowing Owls , raptors, and migratory birds prior to and during construction. The mitigation measures posing intimidating survey monitoring tactics of the nests, and other scare tactics to keep the resident Owls from nesting and discourage them from returning to their nests, is inhumane and against the MBTA, CDFG and USWFS regulations. The DSEIR is implying that it is okay to destroy their nests and use any means to discourage them to return. If this is the case, then the DSEIR is also in favor of discouraging all other birds from being nearby. Does that include destroying nests in trees and discouraging nesting too close to the proposed center? Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures MM4.3-1 and MM4.3-2, and project requirement PR4.3-1, would eliminate the birds and animals in close proximity to the proposed Senior Center project, in direct violation to the MBTA, and not ensure the protection of these species and their natural habitats. Construction Noise and Vibration. "Migratory avian species that may use portions of the site (or the large trees immediately adjacent to it) for nesting during breeding season are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Project implementation and construction-related activities including, but not limited to, grading, materials laydown, facilities construction, vegetation removal, and construction vehicle traffic will result in significant environmental impact with disturbance of nesting species protected by the MBTA. Studies have shown that loud construction noises can cause the mother birds to panic and fly from :x their nests. Sudden escape often ejects eggs from the nest and leaves the nest open to predation and neglect in the mothers' absence. Ground-Borne Vibration caused by the-construction activities can be a significant environmental impact up to 500 feet or less from the source. Operational Noise. As proposed in the Central Park location, this Senior Center project will have significant environmental impacts caused by Noise and excessive lighting from the Center. Since the Senior Center in Central Park is proposed to be open to group events, including parties and weddings with amplified music, up to 12:00 PM on Friday and Saturday evenings, there will be a significant impact upon the migratory and resident birds that nest in Central Park. Night foraging birds and animals will be affected significantly. Ambient sounds travel further at night and are amplified by the water in the lake. The neighboring human residents would also be impacted by more amplified decibels in the evening than the DSEIR implies. While the DER attempted to quantify existing ambient noise levels, it never attempted to obtain the current ambient noise levels at night. The DSEIR failed to compare and contrast the difference between the current ambient noise at night and proposed project noise levels at night. A 5 dBA change is readily noticeable. In terms of human response to noise, a sound 10 dBA higher then another is judged to be twice as loud, and a 20 dBA higher four times as loud. Any increase in ambient noise and frequencies can significantly affect the local wildlife. Two key metrics for measuring the effects of noise on animals are as follows: The first, "alerting distance," is the distance at which sounds can be heard. These may be sounds made by a species to alert others to danger, or sounds made by predators (which the prey animals want to hear, so as to take cover). The second, is "listening area," the full area around an animal in which it can hear other animals' calls, footsteps, and wing beats. A key insight offered by this approach is that even moderate increases in background noise can drastically reduce an animal's listening area. For example, at night an owl needs to be able to acutely hear a mouse burrowing under the grasses. Birds, bats and small creatures communicating in the vicinity of the proposed project in Central Park in the evening may be unable to communicate distress or mating calls effectively. Bats, relying totally on echo location, are unable to find food when interference is produced by natural or mechanical means. Where the park in the evening is now a passive, quite place, if this project as proposed is built, the evenings will cause significant negative environmental impacts on the night creatures. Although it is recognized that noise can affect humans psychologically and be physically injurious, little attention has been paid to the potential effects that noise may have on individual animals and populations within an area. This ignorance of the potential harm that could be caused by our own actions and the inertia with which research and concern about the issue has grown is symptomatic of the anthropocentric way in which we value and view the world. Wanting to reduce the human-produced din in natural areas for the sake of our solitude is not unjust, but failure to consider the effects on other life within those areas epitomizes the arrogance and egocentrism with which we typically approach and subsequently degrade the environment. Physiological responses to noise include an increased heart rate, and altering of metabolism and hormone balance. Behavioral reactions consist of head raising, body shifting, trotting short distances, flapping of wings (birds), and panic and escape behavior. Studies have shown that these effects has the potential to cause bodily injury, energy loss, a decrease in food intake, habitat avoidance and abandonment, and reproductive losses. In escaping the noise the birds are forced into less secure roosting areas. In addition, is the possibility of habitat avoidance and abandonment which could jeopardize the future stability and success of the population. 4.8 LAND USE/PLANNING This DSEIR section analyzes the potential for adverse impacts on the existing land use characteristics of the project site and adjacent areas resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Visual Impact- Impacts and Mitigation Measures Effects of Project Implementation Additionally, the permitted height limit for the project site is 45 feet, with an additional 10 feet permitted for architectural projections. The overall height of the new structure would be approximately 30 feet, with architectural projections reaching up to 46 feet. Therefore, the project would not be consistent with the permitted building heights for the site as established by Section 213.08 (Open Space District: Development Standards) of the City`s Zoning Code. The DEIR did not address the distracting significant visual impact of the huge building design. As configured, it does not blend well with the surroundings. A more Mediterranean-style would be warmer and more inviting. Also, there is a huge unnecessary cost impact since this Center is purported as being a one-story building, and yet the DEIR states that the building is to be 30 feet to 45 feet high. These are the heights of two and three story buildings. Why were there no alternative building designs submitted? Why, if the building is to be located in Central Park, was it not designed as an addition to the Library? Section 4.8.1 Environmental Settings - Existing General Plan/Zoning Designations. This section states that "Recreation and Community Services Element requires the development of system wide parks and recreation master plan. Under the Central Park Master Plan, the project site is currently identified as the future location of a low intensity recreation use. Project elements were not solidified at the time of preparation of the Central Park Master Plan; however, it was assumed that general elements/activities might include barbeque and picnic amenities, restrooms, tot lot, and an open turf area. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a more intensive land use and would be considered a high intensity recreation use. A GPA would be required to incorporate the Central Park Master Plan into the Recreation and Community Services Element and update it to reflect the senior center site as a high-intensity recreation area." Impact 4.9-1 Construction and Operation of the Senior Center will cause an increased significant environmental impact. According to Impact 4.9-1, in order to exceed the construction and operational noise standards established in Huntington Beach, a GPA would be required to be implemented to re- designate the use of the project from low-intensity to high intensity, to accommodate the development of the proposed senior center on the project site. This would legally allow the increase of noise from the construction and operation of the center to exceed the current noise allowance. 4.12.2 Regulatory Framework - Federal -Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Act of 1990. A significant environmental impact related to the placement of the project Senior Center proposed for Central Park is the failure to address the steep incline from the project location to Goldenwest Street. Seniors, and especially those using wheelchairs and walkers would not be able to go up the hill to catch a bus or walk across the street to Central Library. The elevation change is approximately 12 to 15 feet from the proposed parking lot to Goldenwest Street. SUMMARY Although, for some reason, the redesign of the existing Rodgers Senior Center was not included in the SEIR, it is my first choice for location. It is already situated on park land and the land is flat. Based upon the abundance of significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed project in Central Park, and no significant environmental impacts associated with Alternative sites 4 and 5, my second recommendation would be Alternative 5 first because of its more central location, then Alternative 4. Alternative site 4, Kettler is in close proximity to the largest concentration of seniors in the city, adjacent to a park, and is on flat land. This site is located close to the highest concentration of senior citizens. Also, the cost of the school, according to the School Board, is $8 million dollars (plus $3 million dollars of improvements already done). Alternative 5, Park View School, is larger, and next door to Murdy Park. This site is more centrally located in the city and is on flat ground. Goldenwest is only one block away. The school sites would have less impact on the surrounding neighborhoods than a school-full of active children. Spending less money for the redesign of the Rodgers Senior Center, or the purchase or lease of the alternate school sites makes more sense that building the proposed Senior Center. This would leave money left over for renovations, and funds for improving our 18 city parks. We citizens deserve parkland that is safe and sanitary. We need to employ patrols (rangers), and reconstruct and expand the many restrooms and other infrastructure in disrepair....without raising taxes to do it. The in lieu fees for parkland could go far to help these situations. Mary Jo Baretich 21752 Pacific Coast Highway#23A Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 2:00 PM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10898 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Agenda& Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: Arthur morgan Description: Arthur&Marilyn Morgan 16222 Monterey Lane#86 Huntington Beach, Ca 92649 April 12th- 2012 In the upcoming Monday meeting(April 16th) of the HB City Council, the revised Environmental Impact Report(EIR)will be discussed. It is our opinion that the lives of the Senior Citizens of this community are far more important than the lives of the Raptor habitat around this area. These raptors spend most of their time searching the missile sites of the U.S.Navy Net Depot where many of the coyotes are also finding plenty of prey. We are wholeheartedly in favor of the building of the new senior center in central park, and expect to see you vote in favor of this project.! Thank you in advance, Arthur Morgan- Age 77 Marilyn Morgan- Age 71 Expected Close Date: 04/13/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeft Date: o a Agenda item No. F .. .. �-T e'"5 .. '../ .'i% Esparza, Patty From: Flynn, Joan Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:06 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: FW: Senior center From: kaylabelle @dslextreme.com [mailto:kaylabelle@dslextreme.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 11:15 AM To: Flynn, Joan Subject: Senior center 04/19/2012 ATTN City Clerk: It is time for the new senior center to be built in Central Park. Ratify the environmental impact report and get the ball rolling! Save our senior center now!!! We have been waiting for 6 years now! Sincerely Margaret Kay LaBelle 18202 Parktree Circle#108 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION t **V Dale: 117 /k zda2/-4 Agenda nem No. /� Es pa rza, Patty From: Flynn, Joan Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:57 PM To: Esparza, Patty Subject: Fw: New Senior Center Joan L. Flynn, CIVIC Huntington Beach City Clerk From: Teri Simonis [mailto:tlsimonis@gmaii.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 12:55 PM To: connieboardman@surfcity-hb.org <connieboardman@surfcity-hb.org>; Fikes, Cathy; kbohr@surfcity-hg.org <kbohr@surfcity-hg.org>; Carchio, Joe; Dwyer, Devin; Hansen, Don; mathew.harper@surfcity-hb.org <mathew.harper@surfcity-hb.org>; Shaw, Joe Cc: Flynn, Joan; Kurt Ruhland <kurt_ruhland@yahoo.com> :subject: New Senior Center On Monday 4/16, my husband, Kurt Ruhland, and I would like you to pass the EIR on for the new senior center to be built in Central Park. Thank you, Teri Simonis 17231 Chapparal Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeft DMe. 17ZI/4 Z03Q Id--1 No. /�' EACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® 1 SUPPORT.A NEW SENIOR CENTER a I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 0 1 SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTR4GTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE TO ALL OF THE�UNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT�F THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE MENTS: • I SUPPORT A N W SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THI CITIZENS OF H GTON BE SIGNATURE , `�' "DATE � �� / TO,ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE°ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 7"SIGNAT DATE 'TO ALI, OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE,,CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWINGG STATE- MENTS. • I Sr I PPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER 0 I SUPPORT TTIE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) a I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNT NTOTON BEACH SIGNATU A,,l 'i DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AN[ A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH HE FOLLOWING-STATE- MENTS: • 1 SI:PP'JKI'A N��W SENTOR Cf N'lER I UF'T'C)� -kT "I'II.F, ELNVIRCrdMENI',4r. ",/IP,^,CT REPORT (EI ) * ] St PPOP T A SLINIfOR (;FN rER IkT'TFiE GOLDFNWEST A.ND 'F.AE,T3I-?R'i i..O(. AT-ION VOTED ON 3 x' T'NI�; CITIZENS OF FIUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE :- ' G�. -- DATE Z)-- 1112-.41 CO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- ✓IENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) , I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACII >IGNATURE DATE f - �2-- TO AI,I, OF THE HUNI'INGTONIBEACIT CITY COUNCIL METNIRFRS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HGINTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLI_•OWING STATE- MENTS: -' `�I;t�I'�tRT A N_E'Wl SEi`•110t2 i�E.;v'I'I R I SUI'I'C)[�� THI? k;:�rVIICN���IENT,�L IIVI}�AC'C' P�%POR.i (E',IR i C°I,NI'"R AT "I RE GO)WEN EST AND TAI BERT i._OCATION VOTED ON BY TljE i +BENS OF II1_J`T'C i N040N' BEACIA SIGNATURE-M _ �- - __ _DATE -RS BEACH CITY COUNCU, MEINIBE 1'0 ALL OF THE HUNTINGTO"L m 1 AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HU-Ni 'l INGTO"-N',BEACH AND I AGRfl`E WITH THE FOLLOWjNG STATE- ME',-4"rs-. a iSt)PPOR'-rA. �I ESA' SE'.NIORCE-LN'TER 0 1 SUPPORT 'I'llE f-,-NVIR(:�jN'M!,,'t�ll'Al, 'IN,IPAC'-IF REPORT (FIR) a I STTkJj-l'kl)('IRTA SENIOR CENTER A'I"T'FIE tj'-'OLDEN)X"ES-.,.'AND 'fA!.I"$E-R-T LOCAIVION VOTED ON BY CITIZENS OF 1JUN'-f'l.NG'l'GN BEACH d- SfGNATURF, DA TE J, TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I Albl A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- %4ENT'S: I SI P' OI'T A NEW Slr-NIOR. CENTER. I SF7PPORT T HE ENVIRONMENTAL, fMPACT REPORT (EIR) + I SUPPORrC A SL,NIOR CENTER AT TIIE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY TIIE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH � �� SIGNATT;RF, DATE j To ALA. OF THE HUNTINGTON ilENC H.CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS l AINI A RESIDENT OF THE CITY O,F t IJN'I'INGTON BEACH AND [ ACl� _L'E ` i-f'i- THA T,'OI.,LC)WltiG S-I'A-IF-� NIFNTS- E'N Ti' l SIJPPO i THL AIL IivIPACI REPORT (EIR) `,c',IIOR CFi't'F1,�R.kF -F'I-IL�' GOLPENWEST,,N.ND TALBERT LOC*' .:'ION X"Of ELF ON i-�i �"IIL (;II'IZE-L,'q OF14UNTINGTONBEACH SItrNATUR l- - ----- ---- — - - DATE '-- _. TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON EACH CITY COi1NCI , NIFlYIBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- _TIJEN I'S: I S,-TPPORT A NEW SENTIOR CENTFR y 1 STiPPO',�T THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWE ST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY- THE CITIZEN'S OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE `Ff DATE _ 'TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON REACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM f,. RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE— MEN 1'S: • ; I SU PPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I Stj?POR"a' THE EN'7IR(.)NME}NrTAL 1VIPAC"i RF;PORT (E1R) a i S illPORT A SENIOR.CENTER AT TI F C0C:I,DENWEST AND TA1_11ERT LO(-ATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZL.NS OF 1IUNTfNGTON BEAU SIGNATU If 3�, -- —_-- --DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER 1 SUPPORT THE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT;Eal m 1 SUPPORT A. SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERr LOCAT'IONT VOTED ON PY `1'HE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE_ DATE_, —-- TO ALL OFT HE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCI.L MEMBERS I ANI A RrSiDEEN-1 OF THE CIT-'e OF I-11,JNT'fNGTON BEACH A `ID I AGREr WITH THE FOLLOWING STA"iE- ✓IENTS I S TT'PORT A NEW SENIOR I ,i -'PPC�I:T This E"�V1RON IENTTAI., _IMPACT REPORT (EIRl I SUPPORT A SEENTIOR CENTER -\T I:HE GOLDEN WEST.,,.N ) TALBE"?.T LOCATION VOTE") CAN ICY`I'I-Ic: CI`l'IZIENS 0f-' f L7—tltiCfT'ONr BEACH SIGNATUTRET, 2� _ �? /.G' /, =DATE v!�/D� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON THE;JZN F HUTN GTON BEACH / SIGNAT DATE / �`— TO ALL, OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AVI A RESIDENT OF THE. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® 1 SUPPORT A NEW SEINjiOR CENTER A I SUPPORT TIIE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT fi IRj ID I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GO'� DENWEST,A%NP TALBER-f LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF Hl_TN, 'rJNTGT0N BEACH SIGNATURE %'� L_a�'� —DATE — f TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT ANEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (E:IR) I S-1Ul?PORT A SEN,TOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AN.D TALBE RT LOCATION VOTED GN BY THE CITIZENS OF H12NTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE_ ✓} i�'/ DATE - TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON REACH CITY COUNCIL '�fll'JNIBFERS I A VI A iRH:SIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND 1 AGREE �YJTH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: , A I SUP?t--;I2.i_.A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENWRONM- .NTAI.. IMPACT REPORT (EIR) � 1 -SU'PI'OR;. A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLD].NWES'I AND TAI.BERT LOCA.TI{?3ti'VOTg'h OgBY THE C:TLZ.ENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACHSIGNATURE = - , D ATE / -�• s;., .. TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BLEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AiNI.A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND i AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: N m I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPOT:T IHE .ENVIRONNIFT-7*,TAL IMPf\CC REPORT(EIR) - r SUPPORT A SENll:)R Cr1N ER ail'THE GOLDENWrST �kND TAl,BERT LOCATiC)1TT=V0- T IC Of'� BY T-Ft E CITIZENS OF IIUNTLNUI'ON BEACH rQ c-0 SIGNATURE__y��' DATE ----- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTO V BEACH CITY COUNCIL.MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FZLLO.WTNG STATEMENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE lD U TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACB CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TAM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STAT'E- MF.,N'TS: e 1 ,S LJPl-OR.T �, '_\i 4-W SE-,NTIC)R_CE TER 1 SUPPORT THE ENVIROMN/1 E N TAL IMPACT REPOfc-I (EIR) I SLfPP(-IRT A SENIOR C?EN ER AT Tl�:L GOLDENWEST AND TALBEitT LOCATION VOTED ON By TEE CITIZENS OF KI NTUNT6�TON 13F ACH fl SIGNATURE % �2�i `��!'�j " DATE 0',�_ 73 TO AI:L OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HLTNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- kiENTS: I StiPPORT A NEW SENIOR C:FNTrR I SUPPOR 1' TIDE ENVIRONNI" 'N'TAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SE-NIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOC,'ATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE_ DATE 1 TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I A II A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF IiUNTNGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® 1 SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® ? S-TPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENW'EST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTIINGTON BEACH 2 SIGNATURE 1L�/� DATE / '1lb�_Ll, OF THE HUNTINGTON]BE'RH CITY COUNCIL' MEMBERS I ANT A RESIDENT OF THE CITY GF HUNT NGTON BEACH AND I AGREE ` I T h.THE 1,OI.�,(-)WfNTCT STATE- MEN't-S: Cm ^ VE T Sf;PI' RT A NEW SENTOit.CEN a'ER I SUP PORT THE E.NVIRC)i\'MENTAL IMPACT'REPORT (EIR:) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOICED ON BY THE CITLENS Of HUNNTNGTON BEACH ' � SIGNATURE DATE `/o /Z TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I ST_TPft RF A SENNIJR CENTER. I QLTPI'ORT THE ENVIRONT �IIENTAL ITNAPACT REPORT (EIR) n x S !PP�)1:T A SENIOR CEilI"'E1?AT'I'IIF GOLDENWEST ANTD TALBr.RT LOCA.1'i0Fd VOTED ON YY TI'E C ITIZENS OF 1-IUNTIN G170N BEACH DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A. RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: IS UPPOR" A NE;W SENIOR CENTER ru I' CIE ENVJRON�.IIEN I'AL IN[PA\"T RF,-POR.T (EIR) • I I:PPORT A S NIOR CENTF,R AT'THE GOLDE:NWEST AND TA.LBERI' LOCATION VOTED ON - Y THE ,1 .'I7_ENS OF HLTNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE ' �' mot✓ l� TO ALL OF TTJE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL lriElt7B>H:RS I AMA RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGRL E WIT!] THE FOi LOWING S AT'E- TM N.TS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENViI<'0T\TIL-IE'NTA.L IMPACT PXEPOR T (E.IR) I SUPPORT A S NTOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENW;-"ST AND TALBcFT LOCATION VC)'T'F:I3 ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH i SIGNATURE— � —�-�� DATE Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] rent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:11 AM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10954 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council -Agenda& Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: Sharon Bowers Description: PLEASE APPROVE THE EIR FOR LOCATING THE SENIOR CENTER IN CENTRAL PARK. SHARON BOWERS Expected Close Date: 04/17/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION Meeft Date: Agenda Item No.� i Esparza, Patty From: Villasenor, Jennifer Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:29 AM To: Flynn, Joan; Esparza, Patty; Lugar, Robin Subject: FW: HB City Council Meeting 16 April 2012; Item 15; Senior Center EIR Comment for senior center item From: mark@mcallen3.com [mailto:mark@mcallen3.com] On Behalf Of Mark Allen Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:35 AM To: Villasenor, Jennifer SUPPLEMENTAL Subject: HB City Council Meeting 16 April 2012; Item 15; Senior Center EIR COMMUNICATION Dear Ms. Villasenor: M"*v Date, Agenda Item No. This correspondence will follow up on our prior letters regarding the above-referenced project. I'm sending this via email so as to make it easier to provide our comments to the council members prior to the hearing. We had hoped that the staff report provided to the Council might address some of the difficulties pointed out in our prior correspondence and in the presentations of others at the planning commission. Unfortunately, it does not. To avoid having this email become unnecessarily prolix, we will merely reference our prior comments on the EIR and our prior comments before the planning commission. We do not believe that any of our concerns have been adequately addressed. Moreover, concerns raised by others, for example Mark Bixby, have also not been addressed in the staff report. We are particularly disheartened that the City has failed to consider any alternative other than building a huge acre sized building. We have looked in vain for any sign of an effort by the City to explore the alternative of using existing buildings to provide services to seniors. It appears that the City has determined that it is more important to build a big building than it is to actually provide the services needed. This approach both violates CEQA, and is wasteful of public funds and resources. We strongly urge the City to reconsider. Both proper stewardship and California environmental law require the City to do better in its evaluation of this project. Let me mention in passing what I believe to be a conceptual block that is causing the City to make this mistake. The City seems to assume that it needs to own the site the Senior Center is located on. Nothing in the EIR,the staff report or anything else indicates that this is a necessity, yet it is treated as an overriding assumption. The original justification for building a Senior Center in its current form was so that developers of the Pacific City Project could pay it for. This is now highly doubtful. Moreover, even if it were feasible have a single 1 development pay for the project, it would be very unwise. The EIR fails to show how badly this would impact other park projects. We believe the impact would be significant. Assigning over$20 million to a single project that produces no new open space, no new parks and provides no recreational opportunities for younger people is irresponsible. In short, the proposed Senior Center will not accomplish the goal of providing senior services. Instead, it will hamstring the City financially for years. We add that this is one of the issues that the court specifically directed the City to address. We do not see that it is been addressed in this record. We turn now to the question of the City's implementation of its own land-use regulations. As we have mentioned in prior comments,there's nothing in the staff report discussing the need for a vote under the City Charter once the environmental review is complete. Similarly lacking is justification for issuing a conditional use permit for uses that clearly do not fall within the zoning classification. These issues need to be addressed as well We return next to the question of raptor habitat. We do not see that this issue has been properly addressed. It appears to us that the City has once again decided to defer important decisions regarding this mitigation measure and to rely on out of date (or wrong) information. Not only is this a violation of CEQA, it creates a risky situation for the development. Before the City makes any commitment to build the Senior Center, it should make sure that this mitigation measure could be achieved at a reasonable cost. An approval on this record would jeopardize not only the Senior Center, but all other developments in the park. For good order,we add that we agree with and incorporate the comments of many other public-spirited citizens who protested this decision at the planning commission. We hope that the City will take these comments and use them as a basis for reconsidering this project. Thank you, Mark C. Allen III Mark C. Allen III Law Offices of Mark C. Allen APC markgmcallen3.com (714) 343-6171 - Mobile 562-219-4134 - Work 562-733-0114 - Work Fax 13950 Cerritos Corporate Dr., Ste. A Cerritos, CA 90703 The information contained in this email message is confidential and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not an intended recipient or if you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of 2 this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify us by return email or telephone if the sender's phone number is listed above,then promptly and permanently delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. 3 a� rt ^ ~s 3 > u �Ww t . 'MI 44� e w p v t d v L s- f, j i5 > r , µ +„ • x r s. "tG. .qr .` .._ r ik• ..T • r"G`a _i - -,to e . a > s x a «x :._ PROPOS4ED NTR RK �SITE e *4 c� " d Y a' , , n - w m. W 8r > r r . u" J r a a s w, t � s•a, ry 3 , a 7 x„ .a � fi �: �' �• 'g9 �� M y � x , . x � x e H , x.• a- wa.>..„tee- �.- _� ._ z«r,xy- ..,,�, ,. „ .,. � �� �'�:-:„-- `>'0k?� sz�^3-.rye sxs + x l� k w q� i m � b rc Tl.F,"l-1 ,- 2 (( I � ,, �,-" 1, i �� ��;�!�,� ' � �,� ...... I I S,Fli7l',l'l,Y i , � ;-1,?,� 1, '�- - , , , ,,,n;� 1; I 'e'll,,,,,, I I 11 � I �1'1 t��,� "Z,I 1� "1,,, � ,,,, , 1", " " , On , I 11 11, ,.... �1,,�,A,-,`,� � I- ------- - , ,q,,,, ,,i,-,,�z�,,;-�""",�,��,,,�, 2W r , , -I-11 �, " ,,,,-o',,kn,�ggl I-1�` , -, - i �,, ,;,'-:��-" , ., �,--'-",�',"- " , �,,1,11, a"��,��:- �l , %�,-72� , ,"O `, ,,-,I " ,,-�K t,;,,,, , -, , , , "&q 'Al,,Vm', � , � M "" '- ��,,f� �,�,,�l b,, . �,,�,���l�3, t `,, , , , , , 11 ...... " �_,-,���,I -- -,;-,W�F-'�-""�� I I , , 11 " � ,,�- , "2- � -, ,�,-,- 11 I"", " I 1, 1,, Z, "I 11-11 , -T " 11 11 "I ",,�-,F16",, fiwwi� I,.11-"5 ,�y ,& ��,�- �� � -11 ll� 11, -,......... "I'll" o...... -I-I-I - I-I 11 - I 1, ... 11 I ,11 -- ",I ............ J- 11 1� I �����- , ,�� 11 - , ,`� -N , , --- �' -'�- , -% - 2111111,I I , "e, 1 , , , ass., � , , I g, -'�r�, , , z i,-',, M',, �-,�,', � � `�-, ........ ���� ,I, � ,A F�,,,, , ,, , �, -� 11 �, ,g - F4*; -�, ,�-g��'�"� � , ,� �,-1 V,50�14'1- �11�11 I",- -� 1�1, - , ,-,'��,,',�; , - , O;j�. . . -,�,- ,, ,�, �e"Vx` -�,, - � � , , I - I I i - - - , , - -", IT?- �,`--��--��--�,,,-., -p-�� � , i I I ""F",,- I i I -1 "I I I -1,� "' I I ,,� ,��F, ,--1, �--' t�; N � I 11 17-7, -' ' , , g-i" " , , ll� - , 11, � ,, , I , , , ,, 11 - " ,, 11 '�,�P�1111� I --%lil,`� �W,F,�4,,,,�,, U1,-A ,-, , -k , ,,,�,v ,,,,, �"`�,',-','�,,jftll 11 � " ,-- I -11- I I M, " ,�,X �,tV- ". - ',>'A�14-Sl;�'?�'-'-, " -,, .. - "'� , '���, - , " 1�--" I �l - v 4 � �,�',-,',� -.1 , ' i Z� VFW-V,f, -7�'�'-1 M, , " I � ""' ,, �( � , -1- " I , I W�j�"-.'-F`, ; � � , , , -1.1 I , ` w�, - ,�" , I �,-,,, - -W F ,7��, - ,�, -' "I ,, `-, , , , -,;"-, p , I ,� , , , � "' , , , � ...... .� g', , , � , �t , " ,e - - ,,,,, , �,�,, v 4`111211-1�'im- "m, . "-t,�,I,v , - ,-,,,"-,-;'F �,:i I I, I t v F , , I ,,--,,'�, - � , � N �, - I �, M 91 .,Q � ,; ", ,t�,f,F, ,2,, ,,,4 i�l?,'��, . , ,,,, " - ," i,�": , ,,�, ,-,,-�4', '-, , , -fg � -m I , :�' " "",, , , 1111- 1 i , " , , ,F, ,,,�,,X, 'M &�, - - 0 IF11" I 1`1 , ,I ",11"ll "I ,; 1, -, L, , , - - , - I. -, -,,- -",i� "", ," ,"� A, ,l , O 11 , ,r , � "zU - "" , - ,,, I <L :�,� , �-'-", -�---P"- -"'��'.h" ,"��,��l - 11 �,�A�;-%,,,,,,-Pc �.�lflll �' i il, , 1�� ,F, ", �z:� �'-� ,'4--k,,','�-, , ,�,,',',� � ", 1� IkA �111'1`F "I, - � "� , - , �, , -'. 111- I ,�'�",�, I , , , I I A-;,�.�, ,."� ,g; �,F' , A'w 1,, ', ", I ,,,, "I'V"M - , , � � " , I., I Ul`�111',', �,""""; -� "', , ',�,,�,�,- , � , ;, � � , '�',`,jt�N ",-,, .,4 ��3, - , ,�, 1�ZAt �,'�'��:,� ',,,l,-, 1�zkvyl I" m�; - �, ',K, IKF,�54;�,- " --�:�J� , , " - ,v"N w " , 11 , ll MA 'I , A3 , ""'W""", - "I��,/.........!,w ,,,,,,,,, �7 I—-1. Or �, "& " - , ywmt-�,�, - A� --,,F�FL,4, 30 I ---�--,-s-,- ,�Z, ", 511 �, �,�,'r �,X, ,,, -,A,�,,,,"ONS `I �:,� F- , I �rlq,Fll 1�1,,C ,, ,,,, ,��- ,"01116"-j,,�lx ,, � , �114 5 -,O"� ,'.��,,,�o,;,N , , ,� A �,�,- �,';'�,�", , , , IR "N IF"I",-," , , �'- �, 1, '< � ll "W` - � F , , , " ,",......�,,V,��.... ... A,e ,,, i , --,,,, I,",I 1� `,,�� , , � , ,, _�' ,�-5�'- ,�,,,��: � , M<- ., ,, , , -111-1-11-- --4e � - psl�l , -�'-',� " , ,a,k�.,,M,"%-", 11-�l � -,`-�'l , -,` ,, , --, , - -� I M" "��,'�-,��"- - , - -l"- k�gg- ', - ,, -,,'�,P,V"l ,*N', 11 I , ,,,"�V, , " , � ��, ��-:11 I" ,, ; 0 , " � - ,-&, ,"t'll< "WI-4 1,1, - , -, ,,��I�,Fj,�`J��, �'i'U,`,' -,�W"", -,� - ?Ke � ,,, �, 11 A ��-'- W "'' - A " '�F` -:§l't"I'll -211111"I-if., , , - '' , 'pl,"""", - , ,, � g , ,� We, , I ,�,"�, , g ,11,1,;-",�a4w-, k I ��",, � " M", " " !1, ! 1�-�-,�-,- F" , , , � M."',� � " 1�',' '�'!, 11 ;, , -',� � �, , , - M -f, , , -- -F-'&%� -... I'll �lll��,�"Al ,,�V,," �,�,, ,,,�,,, ' '','�,� ", " I� �m I I � � - "' '�` i - I - OR �' K s,,�"",��,,,',,�`�, - , �, -, , 'm- 'P, 11-,I, 11A,"S, -*� ", , I ."'I'll,- -,?� "',I- xgp,j� �,,t , lig , M, , , "',-, A;� ," "� - � � , "I , -,�F�F... ...- � " '91 - , �;,,�,-'R, , ,, I -ml , , -=-- , - , - � j � � �_ ,;,. �- , , "I"" ', , ,---�"-- - - - - , -011 1�1'�." � - , .l.4-..` -Z � " , , -1, -1 - 1, -, ���11 I ,.. FF, I -,,'�," , - - '3� , ,, I ", - " 14 ,,- V 11 �,,- � M � , � . ,� , --- a7,�- '��7 -.- ,�� Zo , - t�� ...ll'��, �M,.-,bft,' �,» ��, I1�m-,I',I" ,�, I 1�� � --����, - ��4�11��;� I ��- �l- - 11. -.....�� , ,,�T,M,X,,, �]� �!-L�L---,�,'�i�-�.zM*"&,=�;o�.---.,-�:".,anu-- - 2 -e � -I -& !1-M---- ll-----M�-,�.�- �� , - � . , , ,.L ,, ,�7 -,-, , � - , x4j, �-"- I ,"," , - f - '! � 1, ,-;� ,- M 1,111 , -�F�-w , ,�,�, -,-i,"" ,',,,.,, -,"'M � ,-'4 11 , ��V', , i - �- ,,,3K 12, ""'': �,--, , , I - 'j!, '�,`, i�ll "t k,- ,,,�', , , , � , , , �� ",-, "", - '�--�l'-f�11: 1`�- I�- n , """,-� - I 'I, � - , , , -�"" :�,-!,�,e '. ,,, , , ri -,��,, - ", ;, -�" -��,� 1 117 1," ,I" ''I'll- 1� ,4'� � , � I " F,'O"I�,,-, � I � � , - 121'Xli , - , , I �' - I,` " , , "' , " -- , -, ---, i� , -00mg A'� " , , j"'��,-�-Z 71�1' " %11�`l � I t , -�,�NAKIWIWPII�,`-' "" , -g e �- i, " , - � IV*__J-1, - , ,� , - " , - M& �--,- Y�-, ,, -1- �-"11 ". ,��,W.K`,�- "AN, ,� �,?4 'At A-,,`dz 4 - ,Z,I, 'i " p , , I -4 N W J, 'N N , � W - I, I , 1--l", ,Al, �1,1,',,; ''?- M I'M " , -, , I M-1- 111V, 1, , �,, 7 ,4 I 111,�11', � , , �W�O,`,-K,�,I � ��I , ��,-��,',',�.,,.,�,-,,�"".","M4, -,V`�,', ,0'� " ,:T I �""�'�'��,,'---&' �,F��V'� " " I �FF �,`��,,",�I,,-S-- 'i "'7-- --il � - 14 , i - -- ,- , �5-.... A� -- ,-�--- "ll, ---�-- " , , . � -�-,� 11 A� ,-"- I ,A�i, ", ,�,-,�,,, � , -�,;�-`�%,'-, �, -",", -4,nZ01", -0 1 � R - , I le,l - �,,O,- -,-, ��W�,,M� _�,, , 4 , - / "', ,�,-,-, '� ,v o",� M--1 , I I 1-1 ,,,, , , -f I 1-iN',, , 3� ,F� ,, � �. �, 1'�,`, I I I I I I'll-I'l,",""i,�"",-"4. , - 11 I,,,�,,,:�,-:-,�,? , I , ,� � � ,�, ,�'" ,��'�,, , F� I I , �u Z�,qg, Gam" ,-,, ,-,',O,, '-,-1 -i� /51 "I ,"I ", � , -� , , ,,���?' , , _,� , F��"5,1, ,-�, " , , , ," , ,, ," , � -, ,� , ;;�& .1 %1� "I z, � I'V��ll "I'll- '!�l ��,�, : 2 "I�'�,��"'%�-",'�",-&,&-,-,;:,��'��,'-�"-�', "FV1 I ,,,,-�1, - O �l 1'40nn,,' -A �, ;z, , I - " - - , .- - I�� I I "I'll, - � -,---�l I ,,r "I I � �l p ,,� ,,,- M "', - , RE I I I',, ,;71"7"1" 'I'll�-1,�����-,`,/M�;,��,�',,',," ,M - - � " 11112 -5111� - - ,, � ,,, " , , , , , �� -1 I , , . I , 1'�`411'111 - I I ,�'l "�,W �,F I , � I t, . , N, - � ,!! , AM , "I�,,-", , ,'�,'-U,�,, "", ,�,,`��,,.., ., , ;, V-� V,1,- �,- �, , �, �M,V, , F�,I,,, - I I I I � 1,`-r-, ��,�, R��',-`,-',fid,`,�e , ,-7",�, -- " -, , I ," �," 11 r I I I 111, 1 - , I " I , - �&l" I , , , 11-11''M "I � ,1�1 I , I -;D ,V 'A I 1, 1, I , W , � �l , , , � " , 11 -11111 � , --� 11 , I , " , �'_"', I , -III�l , , ,�g,",- n - O", -1� " U�']`,' � �lWl,� ""R-�,"�--"" - , � - , i. --�- - , , i I - 1111" , , , ,-i , ,�, , � , �:��- - , - '�,l --lZIF!"Ll, I" ,,,� , �N,5�1111,1 11 1:1 I�l- 1 1-11 --, -e'- ,, " " I , I - , c pf"7i;! ,; -lsrf7 ,-,-, , - - ,, - X I ��, I -:� , � - - , K, �r , , '14, - - , A - 11 �i , , �E ,I I je, �-,',, � , , � -�"`�P I , ,�Je I '1� g t N , - 1 , , , - 20 A -4- , ") , , I �-:;, ,"', ;!) �� ec 1- ,- -`"" I - , " ,, - , - �� ,K-FA " �,,, I I � , t , I'd A 21, �- � r -�� --,", -,,�",, -, 7 ,,��. ,<',,W ,- '�`- -�57:�,lej�,-,�', ,F-- ,,- ,�,��l -� 1� lICT t- / - , " "', -1, , , - � ,-,-'llp -" 6 ,�, , , - p ,, ,�, - I - , , - q,?-a , - -- ,� g% ,�, �, , ,, _1 �,�� , ... ,& , , 4-, -- - � , - , �� --, ,,-,,�,�,�� - rx,� F, ,W , � I - , A� , t -1 �,",,',�ri,k"� ,',�,',, �Pl� I 71;,", - - �g I , - M -,i:'-t�, -Q,�,�i-�, ,�g,"F"',,, , - ,,,� '11-f - , -, --, - 1-1`11 I , , ,,��`- , , �`-,I I'M "- ��,,U-'�";:"��,,�- - �14W,11�11��RQ W- � , , 'O, ikl"fWN,""�,�,,, , g/ I 141 I,1, R, , , - ��,�,W,F',�,��- , mFN,1;�-,-,-'j-,�,-5, ',, -J� I -,a " '; "':-Ae," IF � � � , / 14111 ,E'�R I "t", -z --�l I m�--" ""�-�,j� ', , 7, . ,-,�-,,,Q,�--,�,-; , ,",ie�- �,,-'," I ,,, g�',� 11-1 , *--�,'TK`�llv - ,w,",- 11 4 �'"-;',�,�i .� "', ""�,"�1:'1'11',�,,� , ll�'111"'-P, g��.--,�,m I �j�',,,-��&,�,_,,,,/,�M6:! � ",- '611* �, , , ,��'r , . , ","n,�1-11 -�1 Z,�4-� I 'I �,- I➢ -,, - " "im", , '. """'N"', , I , 1'� - - ,- "' "' -* � , , & � , """ "' " ,,, - I ", ,V,�, ,,,FFF`�',1;�', g, ' '. , ", ,,'g","�" a----- ,- I I" ,�� ,,,",�,-,,,� " ,�,- ,%,,,,,�,,,�� , " ", - - - -I W,W'i�-, I , , , ,��"!/,- , - �,,,K,,�,- '4 '�`,-*-z-,,)�,- -,",W� ,',,�""" F'--"' , 1111- ,,,,�,F�- - " 1/1 I I , '!�g, " -��il, "A F �,,,, -z,,!�� ,�;-'t, , 1��1111,14,, ,��2-"j'O/ ,zm��, - - , � � , ,, A � ,,;,, ,� "-� , � ,� -�, ,, ,- " 11 7', - - ," �`Z`AA�M,4�"'-, ' "F i 1��,M�,�, ",:,, , ". ,,, , -�' K- ... , .1 I I I I : ����' 141 I F, -, ,�-' '�Q4,,-� ," - , - � I -1�r . � rwq,-, O . - � , w4l� , ,, ,ty,�, � - , ,,�F:,� /, � � ,I � ?,-, , w `�,I" 11 A A F 'i - �� , W, I v , 1�111-11 �" i , �, I " , 1*1,�-',W, , Ni - :�- ", 1'�,`-'�,-j�,', � ,��" I I I S �, " , lil- I' ll, -W I I I AF�,� � �Z,..r'p',`,` I- ,y , ,, ,, ,5J - I'M 9� - K I - �, 11 1, � IV I �T � h , 4, , CF"e-g"�,�'� a- ,�,-,,,, , , �iii i , , M , I , ,,� , F"- , - 1� " , .- " t*%,&0%'- � I I - ,/c---,J"�,- "I'll � 11 � - � 0.�� �1,je ""', %,;"],two� -,- "' '�"" "/Al�' '-, 4; �'7"��; � I � ', , 1�1 "j7 - K-F,,-,t"";�',-,,,,-, -- , ", - � , I-... � j,�'f,�?" -�,�.l I 1, ,-g -.� 11 , ,I " "- ,f - , I , �l F�'�t� I , " Ill,' - , , , 11 I'll � -�,� , V, 11 A, - � - I 11 "s , I - , - ", s-,-,",.,,,"oa,",-n', 'All , , , , , , ,� ,,A2,)l' - - -:� "-',�,,;�? �W �' i"N � , .1 � , , � ,,, , : �,, - ,, , � ,r ,,,,,- -v,,,, - , " "" , ,�� � ,�', ,'�, -� ,:,,,, "�,5�� , " , ,� -p,:�,�,,i4,,,p��, �i� ', �, 'r, , �,, -,��, e, ,.a,,,, �ad"` - �1! WE ", �,,,�,,�,,,- � ,�,�t,, - � �� W"',"' � -g,,�z ,, . , , !,� - , I , � 0, ' , , �, ,�F , I , "� ""I".� R , � '"',�,,",'!,'�,,�,w�,N"i��'t'll"�, I - I WMVIW--,� - III1�1 - , ,�, ,-, " ", " ,� , .Ttll-"", - ", - I ,� I I'll,11�11- , , " � "I � 1w, , ,l�� I -11 ,�,% - , -,,�--',-,�,T , I �'i�(X"4 ,41"�,,'�,,,'�.;,�--, , �,�,,�� �%,- ,,,,, �1- ,, ` . -, � l - I �`.... , , "" -I'l'', �� "� AM ' V �`,,- :- -1,-,��, ", 'Y;, '' - p ",RA M04)-'ol- / ., , ,� �`ll V , - -,,,,,� ,/ ,' "_�,' � � " -, � "" - iV';fll-,,�,,,�?e",� �,r ---,$-I�l 0 , I- -- w,, - �,7 u "I'll, ' ';; �""l`,,,F,l,--�,l%l v , Af - ���1, , - �z��, ', F,"-,� '11, I . �, ,,�.......� ��,- �e ,- ,k�� �� 1�tf ,,,, �� - � -:er,/F:,�,��,. ,, -", ,��, -��,,,,F'�,,� , ,I'll - :� 1". -, I �-,�,011lle11-I � I �, �,��, ,,""',�-��,,,' "I'll�1-1II- ", , �,--I,,,-, A ,,"" , -,J� �,�, , I, !� �, ,�'�,�� "�;�,F�,,�,,,,' ,>;,',"'�,: , � -,,,,' , 41,-1,W4111,111,11-0,11%�V- I �, """g, -- t,- , � h ,$ ,k: � ' ? J � - ,'-�,- � , � &......§?, Ulli F", -, �'��� -iv,�� �-7 " �, , ,, � g�-,v, - , 'i -,"", � � � T ", - , -,� " 76 ,," , � " ,��,Jl "', --, ,,--"'' m� ,� N I'll I� �,�-� ,,�-�T,- "', , - , � �z re "", "" -, ,,��t, )�,�,, ,�,,,,, e can f, ". -.1 1, "" - �,,,N!-,�,�� � ", - " , ,�, ,�, - -- , , I - �-' __�- S�11 :`-��' ' - 4�, - , - �`�-�!'�V',, ,�gg'�',d, � ,-, , `�`��--',-M , ," � OF� F� �� I ' -w 11""i �,' ,," I � , , � , �?%Fll'l ,,,,, 1-11 - 3 �i I'll , I � - , '-'-, , , -��,'-�l � �h,',J,Mlffit- �;' -- - , W'-�,,,��-,:-: , -, ,-%N " ,, . -� � ,�,,! , �, , �� I ', , ", , 1� , ,- -, & - � � "" 11" -- ,�, , I I "-`�4-- , �� ",�,,,�� ,ml����l;'I t'll,"��',����'r"�,,�'ll-I'l �,,����- .1, �,I f "", ,f""'R, � - - �,� - -T � l- lv!� 'T 11 1� � -�lll>� � , , , I x, 'D�." � I - -�,,I I'll �', I -F --� I ,; , I I, � ,?,# '' � , 1� p"-- , 11 X- ,,,, -� ,- � P I ' , V "M r -1 ,,4p1�111�, , - I `-,�U�,-V ' ", , , 'i- - - I Q - ,� Z"", 1-1 , -�,--,i, I ,,p,,,�,`� i Im," VIVA , -, :"', �1� 11 `�, - * �l I'� 6 ", '' -, , � - M , , , , , , , 11.,7 , � - 01",, � " � � I , , - - ��,,�,,',� ; 4 . , - " � .-' `W-S,�K - , - �W` ,/,�,,", I _, 1---', I "�l `� "I'l-, � - -� I 9 .`F,,� 111 �,��",;"",�,�,,,�,,��,�,�,,�"!�"",>���,� �� �F, ,,,�',�N, , ,- ,, I - , 1� - "'z-�""O",�',,,�""",,�q""�-""":� �Z;,�"'l "', ,"',-:-��',V- ":"I " 1111111 ."', '-,,�,,11->-I?f�;,�- " ,,1'�', , , 'cit', I I " , 1, �-4 -11,11", , '110'�,�-;- ,,,W,I I " i�� - � " fil M S, -", - S-, -� , , -*'m ,�, A'-- A �,�F,, " ni R5� -: - - - 1, ll� - � � ,-, 1, "Cl -,, , -,-� I ,, , - , , �111" ' l- � �l � �Z, �','�,R",�,,, � ,,,,"'4":1� , - *1 111-R, , ,-",,,-� ,,,111'111'1�1111 �� , . " ' W "AS", -.- 'I'll -� VMXRT, ,415-r,& � I ;,,�, - , 'yj - - I'll I - , 1`�,F'"" I I'll ," ,� - I'll , -�,,'l , , " -"&��,,, �"",/z,;- 11� 1," , �� , A J , ,� , ,�! I , ", ;�V,,,',,'�" �_'- / , , - ll-'? 4 � ?,, , , � - 0-- 211-1, M ,- , �-,- I'll "��>_`,"'�,l "I � '12, �� -4� �, , 11, .11111 - . �, ,'� ,N � -/ , � - ,�, � '; � " , � I im, -`- "'M�-*A ... l-l-, -4- , ,l �1, ",;, 1111, , N , , -F<"��,,�,� , - ,," i�' p � - - , -, , , ,11"', � I I ,�� " 1 - _,'�,,"�',��,�".1"F��>� ," N", 7�'-� �<- , - ,,Nm,", ",",-X�','� i�g �, ,i-,�i>'-'-"��,:"- :� -�---, , ,Ni',',i, ",- -,,"',* i-� i,,.-*,,,-,,`,,-, ,,,,,,J�T;F , - _ , , , - ,, i� '� , ��,- -, �F IV, , " ", , " I - �,,-F, , , I � I -;:`X.1 23�""o,"Y", , � ,,,, , "ll-. ' , , , , ..., �,,,,,,... , � -- --, ��,� , - pm� -:,--- A��-:, , ��-,�""","�,,, '�"'����,��,,,,����Z ""I"'F�'P, � ,,. ' � I � .�W,��,�,,�,7,�,�,',,,��""��", - ,���r,��,... ......��, - , - - "" l-I "I'll, - """',- ,,-1,l--�,,,,,- -,�:'N - -A.F- , � - a -',-, I -r" - 4111" - � � ,�" �� " - 1,''OW , , " let " �', , s - � � 's , M� ".. �,� . , , I 1-1- '71 I , ....... !','-,,�,� -",' , ","'F,'', ,,��,- - I , , m , , ��,----,�: , , , , �, -, ,am�, - I , , � I � � '�- .� F-,, , -�-, �r ,I - Ill' v -- , > � a , ,i -',- , , , - ,2�'l � W, - -1 �P� , " " I , , -�,,F, 1, 1110,5" �, -'-�-� , ,- "�,`,�T`�,' , ���-",F � , -- ", "'," 1��! , " / - " �� ,',-,. ,`,A ,,,�-�1� 1�� , --- 1 1 , i�, � mn - 't .4 m 4 IN I' ',�>_, -1,�,�4,,��:-', " MOR 4: , � , _, �,MXMIP4 ,," ', � , ",", ,�F� -, I , - ,, "'),,I M "", ,,,, ,� I I , �g- '�, , - -, -, , I 1�11��,�;Z�,V- -_%-,- -IM"I'l I'll , M ","", - " , ,� �"" �`�� "-,��,4gi,"i%- -.-�,�,', - - , � � � ,, , � ,�f�c�- � "" - ,* - , -,,, 1,��: � �--,. , , tw,- - ,wr--& F,,,,�, R -� �Pl, 11 - " , _�, " ,�ll j,"', ,� , - -- �- , - "" I , '� - - Wi: :F'�- -- -, ,2,, -,:,;' ,,-,i``�',- �'A'Kllll ,�� �, �-Allffl> " ,. , " ,,,, I -, l �,�-, 1," -�` ��c , " ,,, . � -j - ` � ,��""-�,_�-,,�:"�,,.,��,,�,,��,,z7.�,,,��',',t��,��� , " g , A , , %i�� %t��,A-,:,,�,,� -1-1- ,ji" '.; - ,� N " ',, ;/,l','l,l',ll',&,,�,,-,4,",I� � � - "F,� !��,�!, " " �� ,�� �, F , , " 1� "I " §11 , � , , I - , , " I I a - 11, � , v V " M - -,� , - � , 1% ,,kv , , 'r I - N- I 1-1 - e � ,I , ,P-,' a--,n- /,,, . r - �!, .,,011,1111 �,, � �... - - ! � g , ,� ,�), , - � � - - -- PA � d `-` 1 "'I",,1:� I - , , M611�1-11-�11�,�,- ,�...... -'- "- ,�I'll , MP ?" , I P-1 , , 11 > , , , - vi At fl- IN . ,� � �C ,& , - , , � 'k " " ,--" -�,- -- -"a , , � - , ��i�� "KgPd, ""�:��,�",-",): �,,,�,��',I� ,-,,,��,'i�'"���l,,,�,z��,�",-',� ?M -:,-. "I� , & ''A"," � -", ,l " 12 1 ' �� ,�Au; 4--�-qm - , , W,-I VMS" - , , ,,,Z , � ��, 1:,�� , �V �',,,`C!5,,--- , , ,F�...�,,Y,�- -, ,�,�,,,'-....- fi -" , , , ", i� 1_,, , 11!1� ,� -,", - --'" _ I I - I I , > -----,-`�,P'-�,,,P�'q�, U - !F�,�, m �4pk,",-,.,�-,�� " , w , .,,, '�3j,-Au ',Q " , 11,I I I 11, , � , - I 111-r 11-11WI,I - - ," , , 11 ,,, , �,�7,? � 7 , ,��,,� - �' � , .lt�,, � I , , 11-M , "O" , , _11�,� 'W" , � 11 --, Flh�, �, "i"'ll IM I , ,"I'l--, 1� 11 ,� " ;I 'I" -'W' 'L �,,�,� '-'�'�-? - - , , - � , I �11 I -m-�- -P� � ,,, , Nk - - , -"Ro i, --� ,," --, , a"" ,%, , ��-' , 11-11, p A - , , I - I I ,� � 11 11-1 ,- - " -, ,N Y - � , , , , ,-', ,- � - � , ��,, I 1,11, I * -� ." IF I / 11 I . 11,11 I - ---,�, """,- ".- I"-� ��� "I 11 , ' 1�1- I , , `7, " " �l -�, - , "', � 11�1%',, g m- - "ar""I-1, l�,�"-",�II.', ,-- -1 " ,��l, , � W'l W`-- 11 ,� Al W -N , , -'�,� T, ;�' I 1, 111, � . l , - , "�,-"." ,- --, � I � 1,11-I W I �, s- m,,, I- - �--- - `11�---�y', ` i� 1 -,,,-�,,F ,�" , - -- ,-- 'W, "- - 'i� , N,- ",, , - K - I � -1- �-- I ,,, -� - M , , , 7 - � - 11 � WN,� &Z"," ,X, �V�, � , , , , , , , ,, , , � , - , `- �� , , ",,, i " , , " , '! ....f �,��,`..... � ,� ,�n I I , -, mv� - , �,- 7�,':�,-� , -,"' , , IX t tlk��, P,�,,, �, � , �--�, ol'-" - on � " , e 4 / - ""- ib,�,,,:,�, , -,,-", iI �f�,�"'l 7 77 I I , -�,1 57T " I-,5�""" , -, ', �',Zr- ,45, �, �F`, -7�,' MR - - " ", -� , - ,.e � �:� th �,-i,va, �44, , t, ,T, im -",,�, , , , - � ,,,� , �,�,k,T,?,h ,., s ` "' I-�R,�.. .....1, , -- -," f , " , , A d ,�, ,�"lr I, " 1 ��7 , , , ,'OM �,-1 z . ,,,�, - U , - , '� 'I , I , i" , I 1�/� '' '* ,- "IR, ,"' ''�� �'l"I' I � �1 I , - 11 .1" a.1,za� , � %,-'�-,�- 'm .-, -1, ,,, � � � , `I"A", -�', - 1,,",,-- ��I,l �1,z ��� � I , � , l F�-,7 Fl�"I- , � ,,,,,,,,�,,,-�,,-,,,��,,���,�,,���,�,�!,,,,!�,77V-,, ,'� " , ,f�5'c 10" ,%, Jck-�,�,-- , � 1 � ,M r j 1,111-,,;, ,-',F' ") � , �F' � 'I'll" -, ", - - "I', � k- m - - , - , " D A"F�011gl 1�"ll I I I ,m , � " , � -,,�,",,,, M - I , , e - -,, ""N N,, -0, , , I I I I -- --l-k - ��Wr - , I, , -11T , �� ", ",�� ,I --,, ,il ,,?",�','-�' 1 011; �11111`1;, , ,W, ,'�'� Viz. I, ,11- - 1�110 �l M. I If ", 111"n , I , �1".1,F1 , "I", - I - 1-111 11,,,, -,� ��-,�-M -�- , , �l - - gm - " �--,m , , �',� ter" "I'l " , , "All, I-' '- �,� ���-�� �,��,��,,,,,,�,;�-,�.�,,�',�,,,�,,,,,�, - gA-V'g,,-M,� ," - �,- f , , 'S " I " 11 -- ��- ', , 1!�� ll-�'l',�- -F, ,,," - , - " -, - 5�N F"77, - -"' 9�,,eA-X� - , 1p , I , , , , :',,�'q, - �',,,,�,, , , " - 1�11, - -R � , , I , I R - --�. @/�- � ��:�� � -P�f, -- F5 �, � "� ,,,C�,�,� � I,�, ,"e,,�,V,,,,_j�' A ��FM,�,i,g. � � - , �,W." --,""o, I -� , '15* I I , , -"" " '', A, - nig- �,,,ZO , W',�$ - , " , , "I - 11 I , �� , k 11 , � , , " i, "Y' ' ','gp , , � - S,"A'j','�� , ",,,�g"'p!?g - � - N ::ice;, _", `F"'� , ,,�"m ,,,-;p" '--- , I'Fl.�,',�'%',,--, , �� , , , ` "n, �,�,l�, , � -, - M� - , - �g",r, 4��q�� , ,��' '�,)%,�,,l -�,,,F'!�%,!,,", , � 11" -,-" 'J , ,g,' I - , �,7/ ,�,.,Ki"A%L, ,, � ,,,, "F, �, "It", ,r�'. �� , 1% %� ��? , , , ,-,Fr,�ki,��:',��, , - r `� , F', , , - -�; ,- I "- ,,�,!'�,"-",- �� ��z��,�-% z, , g-7 , -/9 � -- ,p -, "', , - , -�-# --,-,,�,, ,,,,��, "y'-1, �,,--11-1�� �:I-- "',� ,, �V� --�, � ,;"g, ,, -,, ��-, W,� �-�- --- , ,, 1-F,11 : k...�� ,K,Z,-","���`,,,V :�":"� , , , , , - - ,""'),",", I - A,,, -j'A I - , " - I ", 11�, F,I- - - " r/" , - ,- I K- - ,, ,,, I -� � ZWIF, >�� � � ',��* Y ,� �,,�,, , - 'k,"',,"R I , , � E,, - "" "'W"NO`�`, I ,,MSR , �, , i , ,�,,�--, g�'F:,"'A'V,-,;,��`�', ,, , 1111, I 1, ,,�, . '', , '�--"g"M, "" ,- � I A, , , , , � - � , ,, ,- � ,- ,X- .......�, M, f r,- , -,Q,W,.-', , - I I ,� -�, , ;-��,,>�- ��, , -,-'�,�"li'l - li � , t_',- ,,,,�,, , , I I - , ''�,.," , � ,� , I T 131 I -11 11/1, , , S, -111114- "-- ", , , ,-,, ,I , , ,--`- -�`�,��""O,'�?,��',�,rr , , " -�- ,,�-,,-,-n ,� , I -t ,, I�, I 1141�1, - ,- ,IM, M !,�,--��,,,,-,,,"""-�"",� j .,O- M I ;,�- " '!��_"'' " ",�1' , , � �,l " � ,�,, "61 ,s, ,,u e,,i 1�,",�,-,,," :,,, , R I W � m "3"w��;"-,V,�,,�,��,,�,��-�,,,, , � 'o - , I -� 1,��Fl-� n't �,, I 101M, - , �, , -� N�, ,,, �,"S ,-,-"-- �',�F-, �,,,,,` ',�',� , � I- , % I A - ,F,�:,,F ,,- V- � , , -,�,, 'N , ,/- 1 � I � -1 11 � , " ,, ,-, �� '4-', � , , ,, 111 ,� ,, ,so 11,,r"�;, :, " ,1"Pr , , 4 , 13 �M � ,g- � � ,� , A- , g, ,- ,�,' "" U, ':,:,�,,. �, I'll., .0 ,u- , , . - � - -al't F, - - - -, 0 � '11121 - � I I � -- � - , - , ,i, qk N - , Y51, " 1, " � , ,,,�,,�': , " , , � ,�- " -fiWvM- ,r�l',;,-,Q , , , -,, , M "' I"', - - , , I I- 1, , , g , , _ - , -?, 11, ,',,' -� "Ill , z,", ,,,,"",,�,�,-;,,,,;,,,,�ii,R - , , - � " ",1 ,%,�,�1,41 �1,111,-,- 11 lAlT,';, I " , , I , � - -1 �, " " -1, ,1, 1'�,,`-� -� '11�,f 1'-'111'111'1'1��ll�"A', , � iA �-,�3,,,,,,��t� ,',,',` -,F- 011" �,�'-W,,,� , I , �,;'t ,�,- - 11,311- ,� * , 11 " I , �,K, .�, - �m , " - - - �14� � - , ,�`�, I "", , '-,, -"- , , 1�'l 1`rF F�"�-'�-,�, "''I'll",- I '-1 4�, 1��l I I I I- � , ��R-',,',>-,r -t, � "� "la , . . .� � , - "', , � V ` -',,", � " " � ," F , - -��;' ,- " � lil*, - "K F_ ,,,`,�--�-, -1101 , " , ,�� ,,,>,.,*,�,�"�a-�,�,,,,�y,�,,�"",-,"�,-,-,"� 2,4, ,:,,,:",��,� " ,�� - ,<,�'Fi,' ' ... 'gm , - � , I 1�,:','-,-��,',`AFV - ,,,X-,, � � l!N,ML,,F-, --,-- - , I NO � 'Efi, rl , > 1:, � - I *"M> "", F"', , -,� , ,, - 'm o* I , m , - - ,l , � ,-`��,:- R, a , I �-, �R V, - , , I I , ', , I i�, , S' ' a, �: , �� "" I I , , , ,N-', - , , �`� -,� ,,�, -", �: �11--, "," 4 ,--7,"'i ,�p G V ,,,, I - 1'111�, i �-:� I, 1 ', "A", `�',�b�,��,-��!'z. �,I§ I 1',��,, , -tl' � � -,� �,,, - � ` N ,���, ��-,,,,"',': I", 5 , ; ,� , , ', �,g" , -, , - -- 1- " . ., -111 � lm-,�,:, - , "lA - I -',`,;,'�-:�� >� -�4-111-11 11-1," "', t',���Flll-%-11,1,1 , ,,,, , - - - - - , , --, M, $ 1��1'� �,-,�'i-,,�,V,, - - � I R : � ,-,�,:,��, , ft ,,, , '', ,,,� "'J"', >, "n-, ."' ':,, - ��',�1, 1114gi,` �,,�' - . '' ' ' ,�,- - � 1, , " -F ,,-,�`,; , "� ";- , ,, , 'l, �11 1��l-1 I I ��',F, - , " - I N; -� 1-11, ! '� - - , g�, P, ,,,Z.�4- ,-�"X�,��,'-, �, , �l � I ,,,,, -Y� '� ?� F, "Ag ,, � I - 1, , , �', -, -',��-,'-, �,�, ,T,T;,�-�- ",:;"�,n,,---, ",��,,-,"':"F-, � - "m -,5'�� *mo§`-Qll- -11 � ,�L," I � 1: I I ,ill 11 l-lll-,,,�,/--' ,-4, - , - ,I ,,, �, �W�.- ,_�� � :�,��,� ,: : , -, , -,r � ,E' �, ,� "', - - , - ,"m , -� -,,`,,-,$�;, -,-g��.- , 1-111,� , ltl�l ,- -,--- , I I� , e`,,�,�-, ,��4,'� - I'll -� A 411 ',,-" , �, ",".' -,',�,',�, ',',�- , ,-g-'�-�',,", ,'�,-,,� ',',�'�",/"��.",�, , ',KT�- � I , , , % , - m �l , I ,lz - 4, , '" / i � -o j W - 11 , � ",- ,:- " ,- 1-10 ,�,-; ' , -� , .,e: , " . , '01- - -all .; % �,�'�' ,`?,'5', -, ,Y�,,, On 0� I , , , -�J,--,V� 1-111�?11'-��A;-,, _l,,/ - , � - , �,'F 'A , ll� ',�-'_ � �',' M�>" , - - , - IV , ",F" I- � , , I '11'� A-1,16 -�, , -,-,,,',,,,�,,��- """,,--,�'; ,V , ,/ -"��,�- -� --- - , I *l'----1111`lA �,� �-,/,','F4,�-,,-,',,�-�N,�-�"," �-' -el ,%�'o �llz�111-111-1- --'l,!,.,--,,,, 4-�- I I,_'�--,,�,.-�,�- ,l I - "', � � , 1, - I/ g , - - --lWi , -p- .� ,� , , ,.F:" , `�, ,, - I , - � li �i,T,!,' - ,�, I 'III,11 -J� I� ,N-z�'--a,g�---'-',,, I T, �11 I , lt-,,�'��"�, 111",- I , I M !'-" �- " , 1�',',".��>l � , `�6-`�� �,�� ,V� - I I'll � - , - -�-,�,,-, ,�' , �`,.', I 'I, " - I OF, - , , " " I , I , � M 'i�`, -,,��," 1��11`11F , 4-1" k 2- � � I � ,� , ,, I � -" -U�,'� �; I ��,-, me g F � - - , , ',��,': ";� � -, ,, 1/1 " . � , , - F ,,, , ��,' , � ,�, -, � , , , , "A , -,; I , I , I'"R " / � "Y , , 7 � 1,>...t', , C ',I", ,�, , I , -,- �--"��,`-�,`, " "' --� ,��-,��.,'�"-.-,-.,.�,� - , -. ..-z � "�'llIq���"I-1".�"I'�1,1�'i��`li , I - ,P- , , ,,,, , ,-, I I 1, �, a , -0,111W 11F,I , , , " & I'll , I- , � - � I F . 1�� , , , � M- , - - I- lll� I !",, ,� , , '17 , ,1� "', " ,,`,�� �- . -�Y,��----�r --.,....,,,!"�-77'�-�g----,g-,-/ - - I �111- 1- ], I -1- ----7 , ",- . ,, , , �,zq4;; -1 � I . .- I ..- �, . ,� ,,,� - ,� - I , , � " , : , �, �--' I., ', - , - , , � %, , -1 "'I" --ll ,� 1','O�,�,// ' ',',T' `F�'�F, "`� - 'r-'�,;' , ., *, " �g 1�111>11- - , I - Ul �1, -��� � ,�'_';, _� � �',I 11 - I " zl�,'�',, :�,,�;;� ��11�,,,, X'F,�',- ��,, r I A W ,n l� �1,I _ 1�nl- � - I ,�M , � " "",��,> - ,7, �� , 'i -% Q--�I ,--, w �- ,-� � I ��l I -�', `,�-' '��, , - '= z-- - 111Y11111- R �w "." � �:,�: - I I �,!%, � " v 1, I , "m ,,,;,�,,, , I ,,�, ,, "' t," , ,',-,,,�, � I F - � .1MA, �"4� -f ,�, �,'�,,""', ,T , " � ,- -,:�j� ,I--�`- '�Z�ll WN lifl"" - - - I- , V, . "n I , -'," -�k-. ,-, ,-,-,,, ", ,; 1, " -,�, 11 , , , " I F��,�1�,�,-;,�','�ll I '%Wll, ,, ",-�- -,05ikl,�- -,-,� ,-,�/��l�F,,'-,v �� � 11- -'Nf"t 6 � ,� "i:�,,'%, , - 6, ,- " � , - 4,'� , ""�,��'?-, t,��--I'll'' I , , , , I, q - ,,, ' " ] g ;l "R�' , ],11 r, , " ", " �V'� , , - � �l 111111,111 11-I �, , I - , ��- , �kl I �-'�, �,�,',,�, , ,��` -1 ,,�, -��,,,V, "",�, � �1� lll� 1, ,,, ,,�,,Z,�,�,'�,e , 4 1 I --1 % 1,MR p I - - , , :1,�',, , - -, , A I , -, I �`� "'T",�,��fc,�'�,'"- �-, 1,�l , I'll, , , -�I'll, ", 1. , I ,�l , """"�', `,; I �.`, :•• ,,,;� "I'll,"I'll,,� �1,�� I 11 I �l 't, ,",,1 , I I , I Al. -,- ,I I�� I , -� ��- ,", I I � 11 I � - ,,I ,�,�,I ,---,�Z R,, � ll� . %r-I I I I ,,�, �" ,,,�, ,4 � � E 11" I �,-" - �4 1AW" - - ,�-',�-,,,;,,��,,,,,, I',��� -I'l .....g,-�, ': ,,, - I F - 11 I � - � ,'i"; �� 11 �l .",� 0-5 "�.,�,-,----���,�," , , ,-�; , - ",,`M,�,r� ... �E... 1' " , , 1-111111 �,I" , I ,,'�I - -�sl,,"""," ��l-"��-I'l","I r"g-,"","... v �,, *M1 -�g'r'p �'O-It",,�,-� ,-�:,���:�-� MVII�l I- - i vi"�,��-,;,,R,'63,, M"",,,,V,'�W-l'-f 'M , I I I Rm,"'I , "'k � ,',�'lw - " - I �I 11 I - , � ." '..�- Ill � " ", �,e,11-I , - ,� " "' ";`3 -� - , -, - , �l - ,n,, i',%",� ,,,�" , I � "I �l, , - �'i�,��N- "'T, , ji5 ,',5 "Im ,�, , , "I,�";�� ,--r-�g,� - - - ,- �, Rl --,�-'r" ,I, _��- -" , � " ,'e , �, , qitffi V ��,�,,,-',,,,�� ��t , - I , , , �11%1��l ,�� -"'-, -��--, I ��,-,",�, , m I " � �,,'��t, � �,, " , -, -�, !I , �, ,�ll,Mft, ", , Z t ��-,- , -�, I 'A" -W- i�m-�, ''I'll � , ,, m M& u - � , - I M-, "I I-, I , I � L ", I I 310 CUP' - - , ;�] XUA I , "" � I," , :.,�,,�,,,----�g- - I Igft',," - �.. ........I,� - , '. ,_jg -I, ,�, I-IT�, I ,� , ll��,',� �g , �� --, . 11� - l*,l-U11%lll�', , � -I`-- '�'-'V,---,��--'!, _, n�,--, -%, � - ......--,lk 1 , �,.I'lw',-�,,�"l',�,,,, I - il NEW , - IRE' � �1", ", � -�l _� I I �`&" - � ,jg -� , � - -, " I I��11'1,,A,` I I, �, �,':,_ ��,-v,�-- ;, -Xl-� �', "" " �A 11 14- - 11 .-" , '' , ' ', , � 13 I �� W4 , , �, " ��','� ,�,',,R,--,,V� ,55�', 1 -1 11,1011" . - ,- ii',,,",�$�;"���,���,��,,�'i,,,," ,��,.",,�,,'��,�,�',',%�l,-,,���',�, , - IX,f& " 11 -� - -r'-- """,� I�,,',�,,,%��e,",, '�,, INVISir, k�, ".'III, ,, -1� g, , - -,""" l-I 11111-1-1 , 'W,� , � , � - I 1-1 f, , , -� I", , 1�11, ", , , - I , `?�' "' f.... . - , n %, ik"-`,�,,F,��,111";11- ",-AWI, a -,��-�,,,,, . "N � � l6w ,�," `- "t" � ", , I � " � , - 9�1� - -'��le I _ �: � " , �I""",",_, 11,11, - � �', �,�_,I--��,��,�4- X,-,''�, M, ��,-A�_�,��","`,,,�� ". , - 11`,Ioll , "" E " , , � . � , - "I *---�,, "AQ -, ,;,. -1,1- I �1-4"��f,,,,, , --,�, I- . "' I , " , , , I'll ,- 'no", � , �;,��- N ,- I�;,,�4, ", ',��',', ;,�", , �:, " � , 'm 4" �,��,,�` , � , �, ,� 'M - , , I ,'�, 'NY ',','�, , 1�', j", I� "I'^ N' "'' � 9". -'n"T" ,�g,�- - " ,,, V4-, - - , , � , � W �',,'W",", �� �V�'-"-, f ,�lil� 14 ,I �',��-,,'��,,i-,���-"f�,4',', �", , "r ,., " I ,,� "I � , " ,� � -', , I � I �M-O,, �'�:','��""�'�4 ,'I-",,,"""! - '-`�-,'11-�,;-, I 'kl " I-,�",'�'ll -"Mlt, , ,, ,me, I- I ,�E'.'- 1�`�l ," ��A,1,1......41, Pk',- � - I` ---,-, � ,�, t , , I g , , � I 11 - , 1M%liffvil7 � �w �, �, , I I , I , , - .... , " , ,,,�,l�,,� "F, - - --" , ',, " I...1. l�,"p"', III, '-',�, -'��L"'Kl 4�%V-,,,, �I�- , "I�- , --I ,� , , - , � ,,,,, , x ,,", , ---, -.,A4 - I �, - 1, ,i - ",',�� � " -1 , -� , ,W,�- �'. � ,�-I�- a, ,--� �g� " ,'�� I'll I-- 1- "I T ,,"��,- 11,-I 1, "n: , -,," - , 11110111111 11 - I -1""%`�'--, , m , ", , " ` , -,I��,�P,� " , ;� 6, �I --- -W- 1111 , 4�I,,-- , , , -- ""." , �......��-�,�',�' ,,,` 8 � , , ,�� 1� ,� � I � , I ,,,4MQ&ll,, ,- -'�- � �I I' ll , -%,N,I -, '$,'�,�;m-'A-4,,I,"V:��,� '-"� aw, ,�,�", - � , 6 II -111-111-1 1, �"f,":,,� " 4�; ,'��, �- ,�"', � -1 ,� �`0��,� ,%*-�,', �,"I" I -1 I "- " - - ,- - , , ,� , ,,i',-, ,'�� -Z-,--�t - 'k - I '-� , - �......11-14 '--- � - - I � , .- I , -,�1111CII� ,, 11 -I -1- I Y--l- , - -I -11MI �M�1-1�- � 'F ,�, , ,-" , 'm , - &", "I.,- -�- '911- II - -,-I�,�-,, -1-1111C I " � � , ,�11- I I I I'll- " , - " ,,-9�'4 "I " �- AR, , - I I , I ,� ,�Ak_, , ,, 4" I , , N�V-l: , ��,M'- "m", �.w I 11 , �,i*'�`m,,&,�,, ,- ' ' I'll' ' I% I -Yv,`vt� - ��"',"Ky,,, ' -� I , , , - � I �. � , ,,,,,,, � , -- ,,, f '�"-4," �11,4"*1'11"17111'1,� 110r,?,�Z, 'A! :,""', �, -, I � "�"9-61.1 �; r I 11 "I �11 , ,%, , � a " - , ", . , 'M �-, , ,-�,- ,6,&'-'�,� - - " , I "P, , * , W, Z, ,, <,"I"I I- , -1,I � -�� - ,*�,7,,`�'-A- RWP ,,'-�,'-- �,��, , , W -11 �� :".,'�', ,,, ", V � ,',,,'�- -��,,��,.,�,,,: ,� e :�-,�,' , , I 1-11 mc, ,� , 4 ' , , AN- -1 , -,�", , A � I I Rk", , P , - I 11 I-1,11 , , , - - �" , , �:-, 4"All, 1 1 , � ,54 , I , , 11 � , , �,-,� , `�' 11 I , i �Q� " - I -11 , , �,`�, [,'ll -� 'U, ,,,, , ,� - - - , 1'1�1�11, K 1�1 , I- ,, , , "- , ,,�,�,-"-�, , �,' � , 11 1� --,�� - ,�r Zlll`M,i�-, , � I'll �� , � I , , � � - - I � -, � , - " ; " '� ��, �� - "I'""%k 1, ,",I I �I�l `::fizz ,'�,, -,V�,4�z�_tj'�,,I' , --��,," ,i'- �'�,��.� ,,�'-,'�� s", Z, '- "�, - ", % 1- -01E- , � " �,� - � 0 " , -, I 11 ,�yI I ,,�,-'-"�, � -, I �, I v � " ,� , " ,, ;, - " , , '� I �1, , ; ", -.;", I - � ,- " .,,, ,-� ,-1 T,�S 4"� , ", ,,� �, ,-�`,R -�� I , ,, I , - �IY , :11,11, -11 1-1 .'', � - , 1�, jygo�k-, �,� , , , , "" K" �,,�'r_IQ �l 1, ,��,,�'r � � I,-�I - - , , , w- -I '11� , ",... , �" ,." -, , , I- l",, I I" I ,,- 1,11-11. ,�V,�M-, I , �- " .-'-��'� I , , - I , "W., - 4"� , - , 2 � - 'I 410 �,-1'1111i�l� �, 1� ,I,:,� , 4 , , Ia,�� �:, ,, " ,,,� -A,,.�,�,� -� ""':�,-,I,", I "" S 21 -0, , ,, - L 1 --,�, ", ,"," , � ,- - I .",% ,E A; - "" I , , " .&, ,, , , ", , --"�'%11�1�' "'g, - I ,P , I , -� IIIIICI� - , 4m', , - �I , I �,-��Jl: ,� " , , , :,, I';�`,;G�'�,�'�'-�- ��, , . -"',1��,'1,I ""k, &'- I'll, ;,,,,;�, ,,,I -,,,-,,"',� , , �'III�--�,- - i-N ,�,.11 i I - "I". I , - IR I ,,"�" -�-'_� ", � ", , , ��, " , , � I ', - , '-� I �,i, -11�1 -� , �, 'lip r1V , , I -11�J I �5-'i' I I ,,:�:�7�,, ,.,'�'j,,,,,,,,,_ �','-,"�' , �, k, ,, I A,R "ilk,�,,,,,,, : : """"',, ""7*7�, I - "",- ,l��"�" ,-""""" , 1� . , qm��� --',!----- - .� W. ,'g�� � , �- �- - - ,--�- - `7 ll�- Il��---Ai-=� ��--'..-,,M=-��4��- - '7�� .7 1- . , ,t %, A�i� 1, - , -1, - -n2s---- -----!�777�= " ----,- I I 1,�- ��lw-�� 1�1-, - -�� 717777��7,:-T, -_,,� I I I , 'g,�+l��V', �',-, - .- ,ll',� �� � 11 1 --`F "I- I � - -!� I ...4 , I - In . I m -- I -,, , , �, I o�" -,-,11 I ,��,'% �,V,�',' " '40,11 11,1'1' -MlWl'll----`11,6 ""1, - - , , �- "' k Ij- F",""-,-" , , -,"� lie 4�� , , - 0 ,v � ���,, ,, M,�,%,��, -"I 1`,&,N'HM ��II I. , ", , II,,I, ,�;�',,'�, oo�gt,*,,,I -'- I ...... I - , � � - �' "-, 1 F� I -�� , 5A - �-,� ,,-�--,'�-�.� � %� ", q,"'M "', " --�, " - - I ,,',Tl� � ��' 0.4,�,,X,A, ,,�-�'","",��,' , � " ' -, �" , , I � ,� _ � , f , ,- ,�, " R R, I " � 1� " M,"��,,,' ,, W "'I , W "g, d --__ . - I I, -�1� ,,",I"'11,11,11 I W, - -��,M' , , ,- "�" �, , ", - ,,':,:�,�Jr", , , , I I'll 11 -,--'O""�, A, ,", , � 2 k�-,-� - C I , - �.,,,, 1','-�,�,, il � ,, I ", o- "- ,,,, , �-� , ,,',,��,�,` , 1% IRI�,- I'll,,,11'1,-�,',��--'. �� 1, I I ,V ,�, 4��, ," - � -ok, ,-:�, I� , 491,111 - -11 , - ,,-I,-I,g_-', � " '��.�, g -.- �y�-, �, Z�....�'- ',�"�%�,, V, , x,,', , , " " ,"�,',`,",,,,I�,,'�-��,�'� -1-1 I � - :�,,�i,�, U,��',,� �" ,�Z,'�-,M RAT", 'l- " I,�� � , I � 'X,-� "I� ,,,-;� �, -� ,�, - I j , �, � -,gRlg','nl-1 - - ':�k, - "O�,,. ,, , ,`!',,�',"X, , � ,,p;�", I ,I � -, -11-rl-V-11- I " ,,,,-,---,,,,t:� ,- .,�,�, " Na I- '�I'11011"I I 1.11, , - ,& f, I --, " , ,� "'N" ,J,,��- - ,, - � , ,,,",�,,, , 5 1, ,-r - ,,,I�,,- ,-A 11 �IMP ,�, 11 .11 , `111�n� �,�,�-,Z "��, "" �- - �" ,ej"A,�,�,,�_ - " ",�,4"f"Re4 � - 11 - �-" ,,,-&�"' ,,-�, ," - - - I-t,U�"I,-j," �_ �Z, _� , ,",,�'W,,�,,�",- '', I - 1; . � I N �l `11�1 ', ��- R, ml 'll'I", ,� � `�'1-11 11 ,�11 I I"I,1�-',',`,�, ,�lff -, -& " , I - -�,�- I �,-.",,��,,, ,IV,I , ,�ll'-X-,�,111111,1 --`,�,mh - 2 � ',� -- Pt� ,,�';�,74- , ,�,'�.',�;�' , ,11 1� ,9 `-"", , "I I.,�, � ! � 'R, " 4��', "'., I., , , - � - . I I I I --:��-��-, ,:,�i, �*gp� " ,"'., ,--%,,��7 - , ,,,�,,��,':��"" ,"if -, I .- ,I �1�1-1�I '- , 11 -1 "I-1 � , � , ,I - ,, ,t�g-" I ,,, , UINI�A � --i I �- I � :,-,--�-�:4 ,,, ,�'llll� �'111- - WF�A,-� - , , , - , I," . - , 4,11 _ _�", ,� -111 I h --','.�,, e , � 1,- I '.I li�ii IIILP, � ,� 't� 1--��_ ��1, R- � I - 1, 11, � � --,,'�, , -;,- , ", x , ,, � - , - ,- P q,�'�� ""F�ly""k*,,� ,,,,,,,,�� -W�,, ,, , I I.�-- "�"-"L' -�" -,-'Q4-,'- -A--roved , � , , , I M I'll 11"t,A,1��- I , �- , .� - _- - ��',�, " , -,� - � , , 4; ,,, � � �I 1, I1- 4," , '�' I "11- ll'-1 1,- ��1'1.1�1-�', �� " � �'l .- *4�W -,--��� - , ,,,, --;�,,;,,M��,!�� ,-1 � - " "" � � �, I 1, -, ,, , - ,,,,`�" 2M��,""�,` ,"�'4�,�,',,'T*"' 'Z�"�,���� " ,11 11 I I -4 2',�',*,�:,-��.� . �� 'VI �11 --y-m,I� �-, -�s , � ," , *-" "aI , .?, ,-", , ,,��� , 'I ,W, ,, 4 g , ': , � , S"-��,,-,",�!,';:�': , e"'A", 11- SIR!"i�'�l, � ... %--'," I'M `J3�-, - "Ili-l"W, ""I 'I', 11 11 ., -% ,,.�", ,�,,-Sp�:,,,, ,,- � , , , %,�,, �'11,- I- I .� 51r�gvl,U`.�] 7",�l 111--, - , -,, - -I " " ,- -- 1,",l,' I �,, , ,V I , , 10 #1 �1, . , - I 4"O ��1:I-,,,--,� � 1�� ,�:� I ", Ol - ", , , , 4�' ", o j�,,�`;,'-, .. , -,� I'll ,I , ... �� A� " S�l I 1: , " ,- , , M, 1 , ,,,��.......,�,,�,- -,T � -- "'Z'�- - -�I,Y�I%- ft �, �,, -, �-,I ""�: - �I , �,��, 14 - , ,�,�,, - , '�,77"-` -7o' A-1 'o , '4 � , "I � ,"- " I*,, --� -, I,,�,,er,,,,� , ,,, , . ,n,,,i :T.,, ,,�r,.,�-'s--�e ,,,,,,,,, c F �l ., se", "" l-( ' ', " I , I'll, , f - ", �l M' Mpurpa,o 4 , � , I -- � " t I 61 -,�,, w-� ,., � "t i�I ,-,� ....." - ", � r." ", � =, ,, ," ," ,�1,� 17" , � . ,, � � �� , �, ir s,e.:� �,"" ,,, - �, , �,,_ - ,P76, A ,,&77 , , ", A 1,"AN -, '-�m --`,-�Il w P�,;, `,;', ,"'W g'k ! " �`,�Z� '',�W,, , " " , N"�"",,�,4� t ',",, ,�,�,�,�� ,�,,. " M, , ", �,,V&,gy� -� -,':', .-, `�,�;N " "�V" ' , W, - -Ov, -�-- I "" ,le� I ,-,";,�'Y"', �",�,�,,, ,, , - - �� � -' a�-§W` , 1 . . - g.,K-'�,-,- . " g��, �, g A - ,� , - ,,� --�- ,n� ,,*&V� Ml ""," "� ,,,,,,�,�x__ ,I "',"., � -�, g - , ""', I "I -� - 1-4 W -Ia---, :��' , ,,,,,, --,� ,�- � " L ',� �, A I'l1%, -,&, WT.--,,,,- � �-,,--� �� , ' ,4"�i?�' ��,, ,,, i� �� � - , ,4 ,,�l ,i �1, ��X!��',W, >1' 1 1 . 11 �' ,,�g * 1111", ,, Ax, ' ' I , , �� ,�4 L - - 4 ,�',--�-,�� 11 - M,M .. . .. , , s ll' , - "W , ,w , - - ,_,, , , -,, W ,9 -,,,� �,,,,-,MD', �Mw I, '."g,� "W, , :,� , , � ' � ,I , , . *, , - , & , �, � " O" , � � ' 'Ill 4gtl& ' - , 11i I�&e� � ;� �'�:-"-, R, v - -�'� � � ,,,, '- j. , - � I , , � ,,I � ftll,�,� � -" -!�", _ "-M t?MI'll, - ,,,,- - , , M "I � , ,�%I V ,� I- I ll���' "t, 'ol110--�� el ,�,V �1,",5 -,�- li � 1 , Z" '61 I M ,-�ll '1�11 �', I I � , � - , �R, - - ,� - - ,-� wo , , ,g,�, ��, CM - a" �, , - fF, ,i'-,",4,%gMklll � � , r� , �q&,;n, , 11 - I � � Nal A�fl' 11, � " ,; ? -'� ,' m " _-_- , --�,-� 92k , ��,,�, ,4, 'm � , - , N I ,��', ': , - , , � 'I., , -�', ,,,,, , - "'I"", � -) , . , I , ,;X, -'i" -, �'-�� 'r ., I ,-,�, ,� , - �l �11 , ' '. ,, , , "I�-��, ll� '� -"� , , , I�'-- RI " '�j; " � '-'-��"P �,,"I"", ,2%��,C� It", I ", ,- ,,�" If t,All "I-, ', , � ,4�'��il-ll 1 -,�,'7'1 I- I -�`lt��I,,_ �',,", - -pp, I I I "', � , , , , W1,11 - �t -�,t�,A,,N, .11 '- , -1 -11, , - , ,,, I 1, ell- ,11I,','��, ,� - - I I -3r �,��,,,��,�,,,-,,�l",�l,, I� - ,��-,�.,g ", 'I, , , I I r- ��%','�I ,,- "11�1?� 11W -, 11 I`-Ill 10, , , 1, -'-- _ V, v,l I , , � , T':� %�,,,'j � '- r.I - �'!,',I,,,-4`11:��--I , dd-, ,., ,- , Il- I%�,,,q, �l - , w- I I - �, , � I I" ,I , - � ,11,- �- " �- - " 4'R ��, -- " ��" 5 I ri , , ,�7" "" 1, , '4 " �,,-� - - - , , "",�=S�,, � �5.,M "'-, , , ,-� �, , - , , �, , ��, 0:�� , �� ,�!�' tk, ," �A,,�,,,?Sg�,-:, I -t ,"', � - � , �,� � "", ""'I'l,11�N e� - 1, � - , - � ,, , � ,71,�, ,- , �- , ��, __L,,' I�,� ' 1-14 � ,"`" - ,, �,,� ,,�q--,,, - " - ' I Z11,, ---�-,��10 � , ", I� - - I 'Aft, -"�--,�!,Vl�- " ,��`�"', �', ,,,,,, I ,�'W"".'4", I 1 , V I I 1,�- ,, � sn -,�,Z"","�,,,q�W�k,��,"�,,,� - JIRO, t�,,�`, ,-k�,,�, ''�,,�, �,Sp �t,'�', , - , ........ � W-o I s -,I'I,746-"��,,: -, � 1, � , I � -� V',-','- I " ,Z4,, -��V-- ,, - �l ,�, •��,,,, I 1- N ,4��I - , ',,, -R �� - ilw "',",',',',,, ......�-z , , ,', '-,� I - "' I, � -� ,�. .. .... I , �--',�,, E , I", I"Y,�Vp� 0, ,,�� , V , "ll &� ,�W (" 14 Elm*6 I Im , ��R ,�,-- -l"I'll ,-, , , - , , 11, '01 � , , ` � 11 � - � � 1* �l 'C ,� - , � � ��l W"45 N'S, , , , , �'- . , � �. . . � �,"", ��AM I 1�' " all, - � i l&- 1, �� I " A R , , "K, , 11 i ,,'� I PION� , --, "a, i , � .i � , , , I , � "M 1,I'- I - `-41 4� , ml 11 I , I �l -� "i� - �-� A "-coon ,k�-,',-,',�,','-� �� 1. I f 1�,,, �"O"4Vt ,,, -��`,�M,�,-�,-,I"�"g;011 " - " � . , �I-I,- , " , .'"' I I - , -�,�l " ,-,W,� , � , , � -I �k, , , I '' "I �N� �- " ; IA�," , ,,�,,�,��,M& 'S � 4", -, , g f"', ,�� , , , ," � % , n , ��,�� ,�m ' � : , 'Lill , 11, I -1 1'� ', �ion 11 I " �, �� a ��," j�,-'� , , , , I '11'1'11"�,; , ,� ; �1111, ,�-5-- , � ", , , , -� � , ,, I �11'1 -- " 'EIVA-�,� I$ -,,%, - lll , -- , "" , �`,"� Ull � . " , E , �- I I -', I �,�p �, , I I 11 , , , , . 4 " ', � 'r I �, - , , �'��,j-" , -11 �k '- ,r_ - , ', , n I'll ,�'_',t�-j " 17,11V , """""" , -c -,,-�,,'-� 11 1, _'Ig--� 11 - �11 -I' � � ,%M �, � - , ,n--,s, �i, , ,t ',b" , �t I, " , , , I;u:� n -� f-ii'a a'�n-� , : O" , 1. , , ,� , - �, I I , , " I I- , , - , '.___ 'INJI`� . - r e,,,,�,a,!, ;-s, -ot -,-' ,�-,- ""ie ", p ��, :7 4Z71,- A -, � �A��(�I , , I I I ilAkl��kl �� 11 11- I .I -, - - "' , ,�',�- ,�' �"--, '��j' ,W,,- - �� - � - n""'th ,<o � ;IIM W � , - �W � - , " , , I , .W 1, -'j-, , -"i� , :,,, , � , O ""', N'' ` I � 7• � ,� IiI 14. ", ��\,�.',,, " I �- � ,!�_ , " -- � ,V�,,� -1, ,,�,, h�',,, , "- ,g , - ,,, , , ,�-,-�,'�-'- - � -lo Tv "��r-, ," 't "', ........ - - - -,�,- , ".Vr ,", , -� -- �,ve '*-v �` - I , - i , , , -, , ,"I "I I,--,I-R 11," I 1� - "I"I'l- ."I"M-O', , "", - I w � n , �7, 1-�k4�� ,1, ,�, . , I --, - " I � , I , , , , ,MOII-, , , I I -,I ,W1111111 � -�-- P� '1111�11,- , I , , , X--,- , ', ,11��e�4,', - , -�, , -�`, -�- - , � ,�40 i`�- - --,,�-,-��,,��lro'l' -, ,,� "M " ';I,'�`,'�'g-:' --o p ,, , 6,�, , � , , I �e\$, - 1, - , , -M'l� � ,,* , , , i, 2�, ", , , - -1,11111 � , - , - 1 - I i�111111 - , - , ,4 ,, , e, 1w R I 'I , , 11 JOI ,ill � I - " ,W� , - " I �* , �,�-V-' - . , '11� - � I,ill- I I ,"�',,`,�ml' - � k- ,km , a""', " All"M 1: I- �m � I I I " " ,� I I I,-�l I I "',",- , . ,- ,�tll.l, ,- -,, , I - ,,,,gii 11 14-14411",t"A' " I ,Q ," ,,,,�,I 1,�,- -��," I � WO',-, ,, � 1�1 �,- ,"-, ,, , ,� "", , ,%"j�, � .1. �SWI ,,'V ,`-�Q%--, -090, " - I , � ,,,,�',�,- , � '-- I I'll,,�- X, , 1, k, � M, ,-4 11 -, 11,,, " ,I'v-SVI;�ow ,*�� " I� ,--�,k ,"N- ,� luil, I I ' 'I',- � , � , ,,,"I"!",- I I - -1111 --, .-� "I I, K � l , � - -. i 11 - ,, , ,�l , - , eas ', --, fl, I U, , ,, ,, r,,,!, ,-.:,e 11 i , , � , 'I ; � � � � r ' I I "-,�,�, -�,* �-- `111 ,; '! ,,�I� u,-,,,,,,,,i, �'�" ,"' � el, " , ,�'��"� - , I, -�--, "� , , � -, g 1, �,-, , "" a', ,�,�'! - ,\ , , , �-,kl,,,, ' - R,�', - I -- , I I I 1,1: 1-� � , I � -'�Q_ �, 11 ',M�,...I I 'i j"! - - � 1�, - "I, I I ,-P,I m L , ", , ��-;,M- - - I, I I , - . - " , - , '�M, I 1,�-1 I ,- ,�,,; , , '0�1`,`,�,`,N v,,:l �,,C- I :�,'�l� ��,%KM " ,I',,�4�'"��VIRB',"��;",, ,�,�� ��, ,�,', ", 2'I 1 P , � � I - -,%l 7", � 1,1�1 � �� �,,,i ,�� ,� ,� , , ,Q,,,."��� � ,�- n ,, , , � ,ff J�d-,`-,in - ", , .ct,,,s,- -,,.,t�,,tn, ) ��:,���,, -, ,!� �, \ , ,,� - ', a �I , I , I? ,",� I �, 1'1�'l , "If 9 " I I I � � . �, I�l I'll - I'll - �-V � I --,z� " �� " � , � I'll- In � - , - , - "I , , , -', � - ,�i -...... I " , 3� &',', ll� � , I,,,,� � , !P-11? *1-11,11`��45111- , � , � I g ,,P,- I r I'll 211 " - X I klik Nl t , , I N - ,v V11 "I ,", , , , 1� , , 1,1,� -� � , 1 -,�-, , - , i , " , I-MIN, , " I �,---im , %,�-,51. ,� , IN I - ''Itn' ' , � I ,,--, -WK��I�l �,��,-:,& -- N- 1� 11 , ,--,6P,,`, "�a - 'I- I , �,`-, -',4,� ,,,�,';M�,-,,'�' " , �. .. . .......lg,,�*W�I ;,-,I" �- - , , -�', � - , -, , 21�k , wgtg'm ON ,�l 11 11 I,--v Z � . ,"I'�I I " 4, , i , , " - - 'R ,, ,P,t�ffi "", � ,""- � ",, ,\ - ,4 -, � , -4,111, , ,- I% , �� I I ,"., ",1, ,��' ',',,,'�,,�a-, ,,;',�fs<,, � 11 W�,- I "ky, �.- , I "I"I , , . , " ' R "'IT, , I , -fl"I. � I'll, I ", ,- , ,4 � I'-,, 11,11 1�1',� '-:'" , I "," I "I " "I'll-, .��01�1- ,I,�,��,,� �l- , _; �, I ,��,Wll , ,� - I- � �--r , "',' g_,_,��,',�",� ,"."'U', "", , ,g�,,,- � ,", -', , �,-�,,,V\��, , ,%. "��� , �� '�;r�, �,p�, ",'�"','11�' , i I , - I I ,,I>, ,�&,I' I-'��,,j,I ,���� -,uih-, -�, "S, -� ,� , _�'� - r-- ,,, , ""', p , "I�?"-,i!��1,1�e-- �,'��'I,., 'I, � �", 11 ' ",gg,�,, ,,,��,�",-,: , , , - , _, ", , ;�, ', I - ,V� 2 , 5 , - I 11 1'-�M I , " A, ,� "',, � -, I ,,,�,�,�,�,','� , I I � 1,�-�', ,, -,R, , , - � �� �'l � 'k�" , " . q�,O- I"iWild ,-) i% -" -���11111� �l �g ,�� �_ , ,L ,, O" -11 �. , " g, 0,,,�,,'A f , ,�,'Mg, , ,�-, M , WE ,�-",� ,,""kn,."191, , ",,,, , ,'� " I , I I ,� ;- . � ,I � � i I , 1,-11, ,,�,MW,, ,�, ,!� , 154 , I e,� ", , , WN.'F,11" , , �� -��,,,, , ,�', Z ,,,,ll-, IPP ��`�:`:; ,, ii � ,�,�, , P , ,I'�� - 1� ,%, �111 I il , � � ,�,�� - , I ,� _�' , " , -&-,14,*, , � I", 'II 1 I �,� 'w_ m, " � ,'n�� N, '--m v'r",!-�, "Im" � , , , I f-, �"i 0 ,'I I R, * , g , I ,,,�"ll.r ,I , S�� - w ,�,,q,4;,� ..,P"�, �'� ,,j., -'I'," W, t 41, , I ,� "T,l," ,, , ��,50 � -1-111--,, g. , , , - , ,�,-,,' " , , ,-"��- ,\,,l*I 00,% A ,I _��","'�"', - I% , , , R , , A -,� I � "'!_% - _3 , , " , � ,, � 11-� , ---, -%�-",�',� , �51 , "'I'll.-, � - I , I - 1 7,�j'�, �, , ,*"W"" , � ," " , mj,,�� -,�,,�,i`,�,,�:,,:-,,� ,:�,�",, ,,�',�� , � I, -F " , I I �% ,,� I'44��',, ", I , � �- i��,,�4�, PF, -, 1�11 I. I I I�"I';I ,,, " T , ,�6,c I'll, ", I R-119M�` I I I 'll . I-A, , ,-`-,- , , ,I,,.��,,,"P<��'�l " I, , ,� ,�,,�_-,`, -�,-§e��.,,�$I*11' -�-�, -11 � ,� ,u, " ,-,* �, r -� g,�-,�I- , I , - �', , , , , , ,,,, , �z",,-0-1 , , I I'll ,Mlll-1� -V�11 , "- I --� 1'�-,, , , ,- ,� �_,',," - , ,,'�;, - �� , - F W-I-a" �W 1, - - ,. �M ", ", - "" , - , 1," "A" ,��&iI""n", -,- I I -%M-, 'A� il" 11,111-I I ,�"�,W1, " � , " I 11 J ;".,,n•'"',�,'I - �- :, ,,%%'��- - I I ,,',-,��,*,,V� �,-,,-� " ,��, �'G , , - Z, . � I ,�', 11 - - 51,�L91","ZI, I 1�1111 ,'I �',�"1'1�1�11,1�, I 11 V-1-1 - 11 lll , , - � ,,�1� , A, , �, ,�--��,M I � � -,- ,A,,�, - - I'Y,�l , ." � M "-;',�'✓"I , - 'k,� ,�-11 11,- --l", --'le�_ ", I I I,A�- �l \'-�-- I, -�'r I , ;�ft� �""lk, , ,-I 11"I��Al�,:s ,I�4 I", , -��,,, , I � 11 -11 I,�"p. -�l""' , , � I-? I , ,<, - , ... , , " -,"k t , , - - - - "', , :7y ..,,�� ,tj�7�,,i- ,�p�-�,�,,,,,,�,,e.%r, ,z;�,-, -" � - 1, A ,-%' -'- 17 -...... ry ,P '� - �F,+� " ",,'k, I- , 1-l'", lla� , ''"", , ,-��,-*-,' 1,1, � - "� I ,� , "Mr, III I-- - ,& ;� I , I�, '-A� ", , q"- -���,, �,, ,�, � ,�7����I,,,,� - ,��'�� ,-, �, , ,,d -- , L I , K - ,,�& �,-'-i 6"`v�, - - g01,11". , , o � ]��ei�,-, ,r,ii: ;�-, ,,:,, h _c u W, 7I5K',4 ,w , I � ",,, ",� , ,- ,, , ,,,,ie t I u� ��" 1:, , I , 7f , ,, - I L '��:,��,�-,,& ��,n -1,1, "pi,, , ,� , T.",-�,v , I'l, I � -,,��,,�� %,'-� ,,,- ,',�, , , , - , ,I � � - �- -,� ",- , , " � ,�, "r,�,�'��,�I "'Q, � � , 5�-�.-,-� ,, , �� ,,,%, ' -- 46 - ", - � ,"I% -�, W&=�, " �, �- " ,-,��,, � Q, ��, , "M, �,%am ,I M�.Il , , � - T,, 'A , � - -,1ZYI""ll ,11,1111`�-"', Ilk ' I,, ,,, I, , � , , " �y ,,' -`,7� �p ` :, � �� F , ' � -; - lmy , I � , N.,e--� - , -Agp -�I -,$, %':- �,_-,��,-L'�-,�,',�, . 'r" ' " ��,,,,,V , ,T-,IA ,�,, 'M V g - -, '� ,wj- I, ,, � , _ g" , ,, �,g v, , ".'- '',�-"""�;,�"-"",I�4'-��I)I' A",<' - , ; ,I 7 " , , I"1�11'-,- " , , ,,,- , -- ,,,�,,,-;,-'- - 7 , � 51-11"- ', , �.,r ,' , - ,,,:� ,, , 4 �?�-- , ,. , , " I O ,I , ,, , , Ill ' , , , , 1. "I ➢ -'a ,I , - , n- , -'-'�;� ,,% '- - � ,llall� ' 'n , ,11 , , , ,-Ta -," - " -, " - , I 11 I I I " , , -' , 11, - i "Ou '- - , 'M ,,l'- lffi - ��� , All 1,1'�A W, - -- I � ,, - V 8�i: - "�,� x,-��,- "Y' I"11-11111 -4 g g I-M I , , 'y"? - -- - ,,,,,","�\,��' i'��g�,,�,,*� 11�111 , -" -� , i .4 " "I �l- I -��- , ,,-- ,-g�q"--*,I,-- ,, , , e-, " � -,- _ ,�ln,, " , "; , IF�' ,,,,,,�,�ln,- - , , " ,� , , , �,�-�I�,,,-, ,� , � _ ", -��'-:, ,,�1,7 I,v ,ftz- , -M � - I�, - � -�,----� I'-.�','�," ,SN, , -�,� I, --, ,' ', v , - � � "' -�-,�o"'- , V '1' ' -l"'', � 1, , 6 " , -�, , " sl�l I M � , I , , , - , ,, , , A ',-- � , , I I � � , , � I . I , �-', � R� 1`�'.11 -", ,�, " ", - I I , ,,,, , , - � , ,, , "', , , " I s x , - - I & -- ll�'lll , ' ',, , , ,-� " 'k , - � " - � " �,��", - , " , � ,w ---l- , -, "5"',� 4%2,0�1 - - ,,--w ,�, ��,`,,W� , - ,t ' �,j�,'�'�, ,%', -, M,�', ,, ,, , � , �, 11 , ,- - , ,!"�'��;, , ... �--�P,- ,!V�� ��,,,,,,� qlM,-,-"I"�',�' - " ld,111 11 -51 , �, ,� ,:-,� -,"",.w,•.--�-&�," ��,� '9,'�,-� - ,,-' , A , --\,,I,- , � ,4,,,�- , , ,�"7,I'V�"-� K W , ; -�, " " 9,", '--M.,�Mll' - ,�'A , �,,�- I 11VIll 1,�,-," , -- 1�, lll-�-,,�,,�,��Rna - - � �-�,,,,-�',,'�,L,�-, �111-lia A-W, I I *I ��", , >�,,s"A�,, 1��Tli?,11 -- �111,�'- I I 1'-`��R I ", � ' ' ' '" " ' """ ' MI'l-,", -, ��I�, -�,V, ,,,,,,, ��, ,��%-,� ,��,AF-11-,�'�'�'i-il�1, � �, - A R 1,- �. �-'- �-',3k�l, ,,,-�,�11" , I �3, " � I ,;dlil"I' " I d �l 11 -, , I v W9, ."F �, ,�,,��,," I ,, � , I I I � N " , , , " , , "g , A ,, $ , 11 ,W, P,ft��-I�� -11- , , I \1 ",-,-�-, � , I�IAIAM,-I- - - w" ', --, , � � , � I - - ", , - ,"Z 'i"', "' , �-k'\ " - , , - '- �-'� ", """ "', • ,J�,q , -"', , , , , , ,, - ,� M " � g �, - _ - , , "� , , , I I � 1�1';�,<�� '2mv, " �-,, I �1A- - -1- , - "�,,,�pr,�;�,g M ,I- , - , 11 I I I " , I ,W- "","I", I - ` I , R" -,,, - ,�I,,�-�,��.......- , � ',���,� ,,,6, ,�" - �- i" ,'5 gle""� ,% I ,,Zk, R, wl-- 1-1 - i ,�k , I .`.\,,�,� ,� � - -t�- `�, - , � " :,,`��,"�,,, ,,',',, " , , ■, ,Is,"* , Ii,� � '. ,mr , I ,<, - �,I , ,I "I ��'�,���_ i, , , , , ,:, I I 1Y , - �� , M , , -�ll IN RT, ,, �r�, �,- �-",,',*,", �l,", , �, �;,,,�,�" ,- I 1,'I I . � , , I ,�,�- - ,T,,' I,- ,&,'4 ,�y�--',��,V� �:��3;,� "', -,- -P,4,"i- � ,�-\i,,\�! " - -, , ", '�,-'A"I- , ,--,j -- , ,-'�' - �,�� I - � - � 11 ,l 1, , ,): ,�� ,,,�- , , , � � -i, -", � , 'I 1, �mk,,'�,'gi, , ""'t -"' "AM", , I �* , ,�0� 1111 771�, I I I-, ,�l 1 4' ' �,�%"'l r- I '�'� 11 "',p - � , F�,,;,-,, - , ,� _ - "e, I ,\?�,`,��,-'.--- , I I V11-111 14--v, -, ` , , , I, � ��Ol, - , , , - , , i , ' '�', ;��,- , �' , , o, �x,� �4�� �s,, I'll ""G11,111 1�lhq,,�,, V , - , !O a -,i"�ii,vE,,,,,e.,st6,�--,---,..'�,,.v-,i , a , �N � � I ,,& t e- , n � ",�-�'- 7,"",`�,"M"iV""I"!,'�I*- " -,,�, - � , i, -�r :, -1,I! . , - ,,, ,"," 11142"��-- ,� 11,;,""'I. .- ;o , , 1 "U"', W� � , ,t 'i ", � ,,,,,,,,, -, , , ��,a -, �,t.n� ,g-:,:I,, � - ,,o� ,o, , -,, 1� 5', t , ��? � " ,I , , 11., �k ��,� ?P,`�;`��I,', .1 ,� - t h `P,,�b,t;��,,� ' " lll� ,4 � ) I , ,�, ,, , "'- NO I % , k�,-,� 1, I �I- 1-�l -0 - � I-11 � �1051`11 R I�14-1 Illl- I ,- , ��ill- ", � �e*,E, ��Om,-F, -, ' F 1"" 1, a,,-i,, �V�,, k ,, ,al b I I 1. -l" -W '�- L I � - � , 7 ' ��,, �Ill ll� M,,-," *", ,"'�" -, - - -,-' A I, - 11 1 ... ....� � kv,"�, I , '�-', - , , , -' I I -�,NIIS -,,4, ,, , ,I ,,, ,� `,lell�',"I - � I ?� ,,,-,�,,,�'ll""I�1.1111,� '�,- " , � , I - , - , - "', I -.��'1,1' 11, W.IX � - �, ��, �, �,� -,1,1"" I . J�l,1�1�z,� - '� ",, ,�, ,,,, , , I, ",, `�`�'11' 11 11 � 11,,fr -,� - , , - - .1,L,l-"� -��',,v 11 I o' " 4" , - �, IN ,, " " I " - '� , , \ I -W "" 1�"I'll, , -�",�', ��I,, �,V,''�-'A " I,,��, '�� I -Wlllll-x� , - IM, gA,��- g, ,U " :A"ll 1"I"A"I", 'I�'�',���"""�,p�'�,�"''-�,��,,,,��, ", 41, `z" 1 , � :-'-'l,�j,';, i'� ," , ,-',� , , , -� I 'll,"_1 11 -< m, 1,11 ` "Il"V114,111 " �-,,`: :� , I � , I 1'� I"m " "" '11,14 ,,,4,'�K I "�,III'\�,,� � � l,"l- ,"p-, �: '�11,"l - -,4_� r ."I' lz��'1'1�m � 'U ,�,111)- I I Ell-V ,��;�,, ,-,- ,,,,,, ,�,&J' , ,,"', ?2!lAlQ�g,`I"-»^•m -', , �� ""'n,,W,-','�', - �� -,�, , g - , � ,�,,,�I , llll� , ,�, I ,� � "" , "�A,_� " '� ''" I I M��, ', ,,," , , , , ` -:, -. , IN ilk'1311-1&1'1�1 I-�1A I�1`��11 I --�'��'R.."'11�,"I"-1-1 I , A ,�III '-,:�1`,',���"Jilk"�, , v,,�-- , , , ; vkl� I,'-, -�, - �',,,,4 W e K�Ij�, ,,� '� 1, �', -� ' , ,'�'�` " 'I" , I �,��-,-;t , -n� 1 ��,�',,�,,`�-,`, t\S� ' ' ' - - 'I"Z"", ," ,%',QV� � , , I , - ,-,�D ,--""'-l'%Vw\,i 1�f ',��'T!�-ell '4-lkv, -,", ""' I " 111-1 I'- , ,, ,-�X- , - , 0 -'l I "' "' 51-1'41,k'��, T -m •,,"', o`f I -109. - - , , �� �, 'I , , � , -,"� , , "�-,I- :, � ", , "',",4'�,,,�� ,,-- -�,,��,, � I',, ,!O, , � - - ,.. .. ....... .. '� - W-v -0�,,�,� "�,, "�,,�"",A,i",�-�""-"�,�,,�, - , " , 1�,Y- ,�,�� w- , -1" -.1 11, , -I- A4 - ' I Ill , ,,,-, � �" '�-'� ' � -"��",-,',`h,4",�,,f% -"--," " -', a"", � -1 � -��,�, � , � 11 I 1�, , I , ",� � � - I�1� ,�� -- , ,` " ,,, ;AW ,I��, 'm 1 1 - .15 K", -'I, , ,�,-� 1- 111-1111 I 1-1-11 - , o -', , "Il":'i", P, 1�1"'I""P.I�-. - �-11-1'---�V" i , , " ,"I - , a , V �:'','�'15 , V 3� �,�,,,-:',,,�-� -,��'��,-,,� ,-;�, 1A ,M '' - - �P, A I � �g ,,, , - ,", ,- , , ," -- ,�, ,�l 1, i� � L"',-- , �"":", -,,i� 11M,Ftl W1,',�' '%AII - R,,R ,',,� , , :",-, � 'g�� I ,,: "' - --, I�, , , , ,- .��.,,,',' ,", "V," ,I- 11 1�111\I ,1- 11 , 1.14� �-, , - -,tf,,�,,j6,��',,, , 'I� �_5,,-�'Q�,$,'�"' , , ,- "a�� 1, , . , , TI$ - �'�-,q,�- , Z":,,, ,MZ�,,--`,� ��- , - , �,!"!vi�1`nk,'-t"q,�, ' ., ,,, �Ill", � � ,� , V, ,-- , , - --- 1 ,/�,A��: , - I -1 I � 11114 11 ,I - , � 'P , ll�l , , ,; �� A�O,OM" 0-2-rl 1� *,, Q , % -,,""I''. I , , - - -1 I I AW ,"", ,� �- ''�" -`�'Mi, � I ,.,\,\�,l , 1 - na-, "A- zll�1�1�1-,I- I - `�� 114,1 �� III 1111-I,I,,, '� , "7t, t , I,6� `I , -",-49, I I, "T" , " - I K, ,,',�Vzl�,' , - J �,"I -,���- , �,--,�" -, , ., Q , , , - ;l , , �� I A, , �, . I o ,4 g ", , , , I , , , I "' -), ,a:•,: ;, y I , � , ,,�, , 77,77"", �,ll ,O`al�,,`>,,�, - - -��k', - c-E"Q ;�, "i It" M,5"�--", ,� 1`,�,` ,� , , i , "ll , Z,, �1,� ,,,,"c� -�,, ",",- ,,��___ �.......�, 1 I,41 - i, _ " , N , , , -,-...... , I -, , �- , 11 , , - - � , , , , , � � $1, , � ,4 � '-, , q 11"� - - - - � , , , I 1�- II,11111'el -, - _ "....... , , � . � - - , �l �l - -1 �K�,\'�-� � 4�l 11 11 - �2VII: Ill- , I A �- ,,J--�", ,4 I � � I, �_ ,�, �- , � � I- ,, - "ll �,- �,'��,k% � , 115-11'1�Z�lkil�1'11','�,�-_,, ,,'-'-:, ,'' 'I --n-"', ,��')Iw ",� ,R , 5. 11., , I-If, , 11 I, 'r, -11 I I I I �' ,n'i � _,,,,,,0 -- - ,�l ,,,, - , , -, , -, - - , �, -111NE-I",, ""',,11" , ,:�-'� 1--�,�,� � 1;���'%-.-I,'- ,,,�,-,<l ,,,\, I��: � 1, - ", ,��,- , �,,� - A , 4KA"ll , I � ",",,'- -,, 'j' '�,,��-, \ I-1`11��l Il, - , '6,tA`,,,--�,�,�- � I,,,"", � , � I',g,�� , - ", ., , ,-- 1-- - - II -�, " -I�A , , - I'll, I , -, I I I "W , - ,w, , , , I I I -'�� � , , '--', I I W, I ......~r•,,�r ": ", , pe, I-, � ��i s';"," , , , , I�1WR , , , 'a - , ;� 14 . I�," ",""", ", �� , "M 11,�, 114�l ��- ,� , , � I ,�,,,_ I" � �� --1-1-- -I - 1, nk,!; ", I I'l`�" � " n, I tffi, ,'�',��-',-P,,,,, ',��V- -, ,,,"Ill- -� , ' ' , "":: '��; � lF, ,Z�'�"'i"fl, ""',"k,, "", , i \,�'��e,�1�,��,v"�'�, �� 34�, ,-- ,�:�,-tI��,?,�--,�'�,L,,`,`.'-� ,,, "'---'-' I - I ""IM" , " 'PRI'M&�Q 1'�"; �,%��:I�-�,Z�'Id-R�7- 'W' , �---- , ,- I',,, ,lllll-,�� I Z�-,,�, OR C,-�,�,�-,',,NR , I � � , , rm " - 1',-,, � , M,� ;,114? " ,, - �, �-�;�,M,�,, ", , - , ,,��, w- ll�l , , �',6�m, - ��I" M ," , � ,'' ��',- , � -� , - ,- ""I�,� --- I-T,", ,�, � �" I il ,.�I, , , I I ,-n,� -`,,'N4,, -," I", I i , :, , " - ," J� � I �,, ,- � , ',-, ,�l I "e, , �, ,,,,I '*". , or - I 'n, , - ,,_ , - 2 - - a j O , �'-Z',,,?,"�' 1� M"',PA,,�, -", ,; � , I I " ii;� - , Ef �-'n"k, -,, , -� ,0-�� ��,�,�� � •:, ,% ," �-1 ,� I � �, �I " ,-`,�'' - A � �,- -I ", , ,; , �- " , p,,_ 1'�,771 R IS El , ,��---"' ; � ,` -,,�,-" �'- - , I" I - , y - ,, - " ': �,U�, -,-,�, , -, ;4llNI,- - �`- - 1, W , � %�,"t, , -", ` S 1" , P" "" ,:� ,""I � �, , _�,,`��,,,�,,,,,�,--- , � M, , , -,,--�, I` I"" -'�r`,-,4 - I I �AM m ,"- , , , M 1----l'�: �111P,& � " __ -4 , �, , " -ft7j ",, ��,� v,,,,--,,,,I I I . � nw, , ,��Rl.-.- �-- " � - I 1�<Rll 1.0"ll"I'l- -,-� � -- 'I", &,`M,,�,,� ',�'�', �n,;,'wq�,,�,"-,'- , I,, , a I ,� W."'110 ,',4",�1, -� , � ," , M ,, _,,��,81"� f_ I - I 1---- --, � ,�I n L , ',', , M , �� I. R�1<�k, E,,l-"",g-'.'�': - ,�,g I I * -4% � � , Z'�L�,�- , -- I '. v ... �gv�,leaa, 11, W ,- �-,T : , ", . , , 'm "V!-11 x ,4, � M - < , ,�1 n" -":"- �-, M, , �, �'l " �� N "� - -- I O" , �'I � , I, �i _�, - W �"§ ,ttr, �-7 � , �, k --." -N --,,,1,11� No, , - ,��� , , ,,, ,I - �I , , � ," ,,, "'n , , I , w- W, ;"',---:. I v im , 'I'll ,, I , I , I w "",I ,,, ,p., , �t � , �A - ,P , O " � 11 ,-11 I'll I�l I�-� �� � I , ,��----,,,, i - - I � - I ' " .? , i E k � -,'Z, I , - I t " I , , -- W 11 1�"',- , 'I -,��"�"'�""�"L!��:�'��' """ I - I �:"�'- - , � , 11-1 -.,��' - 'r-, ��, I -11111"A , .- r ON - -, ,� � 1-1-- .1.1 -- ..----- -7,`---'l - -1.1�111-1111-......-", ,"I' , - ��-..,.i.,......-.,- Y'TM• ,I � , , --11-1 "I'll -11--- 1. - I --l-111 R'&&,,�,,� .", - -1-4,111- - -, ,,,,,,",P, , � �, -"',,,,, .1 - , � ll�,t;O�l I �'11 , -:I", - 1-11 I I-,�',` '�,�- ,,�,�'T"Y"',;"�,),I II 5 11 I " , 1,t I "I , '�`"";�151,�n��,�",�"""�'r" �,,',,� ,� ,'-,AW�-`,Ao"",, ",� '� --`W�T I-5 �, , ,� . ,,t,,� ,,:,�, i�, ,,-�`,,-', '�-_�, ":�-,,�&.,",,, -, , 'Z ,�- ,� ,,, Z - , �, , "' ' - , " - , �: p'.-,"',.",�-�4�,',,,,-'n,"."� ��',1, ,,F �R�','l�I�IED�; , _ . - -,V�' I , ,, �I 1�'4-,,l 11 I 1511 �I 11 -I ll.,�' ,,,V "al", -� 1, 1'1111�1., -� - ,r ,-� , , ,-�'-_ - % , '��--', ,N� -�"'-- � I 11 - I, , o � " , 0 , W" - ,�, �,",,�,,` , I I R , - -, , I : , , - , , , I , " , E ll� , iK -.- � -, - , --n� - "� , 11,101i '!'y�g � "I 1�� g , - � 111,1111I'�l -W-- �'llz,�,,�� ,1; " � , " , , ,�I,��,,MQ , N "' , , - - - , ,� � , 11, , , , , , . � , ,�," �-'-,�-`??,�.e , � , - k, I I -v, ,,, I , a - I I'll, I � - Win.: V,5- I'll 'v , ,,,t-,N4 'NO '�"' wn, ......� -,-�- �-*-, I 11"','�!1' I�L �;"` - � , I" 6,�, ".t' , I _ I ,,�,,s;*,�§,,�,,�,�,,�-- -111,-,, 1� �.11 -, " I �, "Ill I N",,1,I � I&I",1,'g"O",,,,�A': , , - , � , " 1- "I'll, � I I�Y�"I'll,I",,", I ,�I,I�l ,':� I ,---III ..... � I-�l ""1� � " � t� ,-�',,,-'�" ..... I - � I ,`r`,,,, ��-'11'1�' '.V �A"',, .,MY, - r,- , ,�I -�-g ffib�' , , ,,,� -, ,%,,�,�,�,j�'-�',- ,I ,,� 'n, - - "",�,?�,�-"--',���,,��,,�-,�t,,�6,1,,�" I g , �� ',?�',"�; I , ,,, I, h, ,� ,� , ,�X,, P�',,- -11, � ,A � , " � R-61 A .'Z, '�-,,� �, . "�"--J-'",,.�,,, �k�--,,-1 ?,t�I fe� " 0 v,I,-�,, I.I I, 11�.�I... , ',, `,, -1'1� I,,I,;,�l " " " �o �1� ,I - � -,',,---- ee�I 4, ,����,��,llg"",�- , � " -.���I........ -�-1 ,,�_,,' I 111I I`-, ,�",,,-,��, ,�, ...... I Il,-�",IA-�`,�1-,-,,�' I I, - � �, I--,&, I,�..... - ,,, ��,, A 11 11,11,11 �,,,�,,,", I 't. ,-,", ",� ''. � , '',� -- �,,,,,,-, ,"A' I g�,", ,. �, I,�- ,-% ��, I I"I . � -i& , �A ,11 ll�, , � , � �",,, , � , � , ,I Wl �'� ,,�,6 � � -'�-,,-�` "��,� -,, 11, " I , , � sw-- , � M��-,, , , M I , ,,,-;�I,� !,.�:"*" I , I ,V ,- " "�-� ; I ,��,,, 1� 'm ,��,- 4 '11111111 - . , ,, ,�, 11 It ,, -I,,-4,." �l - -,,III I � �, - , -111- �, ,,.ly,,%Iiq,,,,�, ,---�`� NNE,-,,��-, -�,,,, 111 1� I �, ", - I I 11 I'll, ,M,, ,� ,,�Z" " --�Io , 1�,�!�"" W g w- - , , 1 4W�-1�,--�llllv,` -"I"'R ll<'-,�"Al',�,'� i;�4,,,f,-��,:�.,,� ," ,; ,, 'k , , ,,,i, - - , -1-11 "ill'-�--,,"'IN-. I I- �, -,,.��gx'&,-�,,',',I��,--l""ll � 11- ,i 1.4.�,I'm , - -'W-I�� N11- lll'�,`,I , �V%- -?-,�`,--`,,�,� �,� '�',�, ', I I " , , � , , 4��]""_�%�,�', 'n,--,e I I 11 � ;"- --� I"WA, .��,-,--' " -I I III I'll, I I I �7�'-,-��,�,t,!!�,,��,,,,-,�,�,�,-', ,"4,�,� I " -.- ,,,,, �e �'�_�, ",� I� � ,','�,0 IS -I,-�,I�-'"'ll""e I I �,' I O", , - .1,3 111111- I ,j�w-,� , , _v x", mam�y,,�_ 11 I 1��'-�`� ,,; � I I ,V& -,, "=�x""",-o, I Im -,,'I`I?� z -l-, -1, -v- '� 11 I "I'll I' ll, I , -, I-1, ,,11-�I' ,, - , "-, � � I" - �jw��-,,-, �;� " ---,,- 11., �,�:WxOg,'I,%, I I 1-1'I� i'lls, - . , �-I � ,,,,-� 11 V 11 , '�': 71� ,; , - , ;� -�,"' '�'�: - -' �� , ""ifs � I - I I -�1'11 I I � 1: - I �, -, , I I I-,,,�,,"I " �',�',,I� � �-, IR',`l , I �: ,-,I-' , , , �� I I I , 3 '-', � � - ,,, I , - " ,11 I'll, --ll -1 , , _', , �,> , --" 11 �� � `", , "I'W" ,,,,�,,_-,:,',',,�I',', �, - , , - �- ,,, � :4, " , ",� k,� , , " �� , ,,- I �l � "�,,�4"��,,�.�,�-""-""����,,, , - - i,I, I, , � - - - - ,," - v %- �;,llll Ul L', , ,�?, � "","I",�� ,�,- $ ` k" - �- , - "I'll" "I" �,, 11 �,"",-.,I, , , - " -, 1411� , �P� '��'� ,41 � , IR - � `? q,':� , r m i-w ,��T, �'l `,,,�,, ,"!-,I ,�P,�x-,,, i"-�,,,,, ,',,,"),:,I� ,�, 7,07 l " � I -7- 7, �,- ,,��, � , ��, ," �-�-,',, I � , � - .-,,,-, , � , " , I , ,, ,__,", " ,',,,,�"'I 1, - �� p" ,,, I'll �", I'll , ,�, n"!, � , 1, " gl� ,I'-",I , 0, I I 1", ,� Mq,"', �"" , , ll-� I I'M I�11-W ...I I . ",1z,IIC-ll�I I,....... ""',*-,�,z _,g", ,� , "" , � ���n, , . ,�', , , ,�, �',4WI��V�-,`�- - -'��-M -- ,I -.... NII, , , - 11 L, 704'.-, '1�111'1 - I' , g� , � Ir- � I 11 1- - N I- ,�,,,,7,�S,R-�- � ` - ! ,,,�7 11 ��������� , t' ; , ,,,,,,,,,, , , � ......I, �j �hl,v, ,,%g,", ,�,� ,� " ''I, , W.,. -,-��".-�,"""'."',7�,��,i -e'11"I"., ",, -, -� � , ,"l. , , Oil,�,,'I, ",I ";11`�, , '1�, , �-" �, '4 A,� zl,��`,��,',�,�,, - I .1 11 ,11'1� ��� I " ,�:I "' � '. _ � W � ,� , ,'g _ , , I Nll�, f ,I ,��:;I-',�, : I 1�� � ""',:. � ,1.111, - Moii, �",,,,,,, ��������� a I � IS 0 u U [;.I �, - I,I , 1-4% ,p , ,,,,,,,,, � , ' ' , "ol 1, " "I " " -1 ' ', ,, 72N,7,�, ,,,,,,,,,, � - ' ', ,�, � I I 10, - � ' "', - _,4 , , , �ww-,:%'�" "I . W . -�l ' 't ,", ,"" - �-,-m-�`,,,�i�� "'ll _'@_ , ,� "�6 " _ ,,;� FM NN 6 '', I � - ",� ���� ;RM -� , !I, , � - � M - ,Ij,l ,I Nuly:�,,Kl' , ___ 1-1111- -1-1 , I- ,`�, 1��1,1111I- -� '�lt'-l--,'ll',, �'�II Rl,�,,l,,,�l;:',' ,!, - - 11 --,-� ,-�,,-�,,-�,,-�,,-�,,-�,,-�, ---�'111- - 4 , I_- -�,:l "" � - I I- 111-11,11111" ,RW`,,'4' - ,��- 1 111i.....II� , `� � , "' `�,,`-��,le,'Jl��Z", 11 -�, -�,Iz�,�, 11, ,,:I,',,-R,,�",k`-, - 'W14 PG",`�-, I I - '- I 11-111-1-111, - ;-I', � 'I., - ,�, , - , .ml-,oK -W:, ll ,"ll",I11111-1,11" ,I , �,�,-, 1� , ','� , �',,,,,,,�,,,,�, -,- ,,,, -1, I ,"'I 11 11MI'll" . , I '' , IIU,AR� 1, �, �11", � -O'W�-�- , " l-"N't, �I�lllfil -��,' .l 11 'O "I -4`� -,-i,'W�`V ,� - �, I ,�,,, ;,Il- I�- � ,III � '- I �1,11 "� 4, OR', , - ,�,-. '.,� , W b?;��,, , ,- -,w" , ,U"! ,- ,,-- , I 1�11 11 - - -,�,, , � � ,,,, ,z , , I, 511-��11111' 11T�, I "' " -, -"" I -1111 � F IN Ir - "' " 11�'I -1 � ,,, _--� ,-��-:, 5-"L - ""I 11M, -Y" 'I'M �'I-, "4� -71� , , -;��,,�Z--"I�,� 3 , , - � , - g gg, .1�',��y��,lp��,�,�f,�l,,,,,��,�r-� ,� g,,,; z"'Im- - " , ,,, - ��, ,,,��r ZW, "" , I 1 11 �, , I � ,- ,1,," "M�D_�,;,�'_�',',�, �� , 'IF�w"tea:. ,� , - � , , -,"""'I - , ,'_�":�'j , I� 5 I I I j I 4-� ,-.�M,IA - , , "", ,K� , ,,.',�%',,, ,- ,,, I , %"' N N , ,, -, -� I ,Wi W! ug,, , K -�, � IT�QIMV ,,,, :"A'WR�!!-, ��','-"; " -,-, ,_��,,�V �'V- ,,,,,, �,��,,nr�,,I- ;, -�-: , I . - � � X,',,�`��, �I , �'--'V , " P _ . i , , - E , , - -- I - ", I - -il, - , - -, 4 - , ,, ". - 11, �-, 4, k�,11�14��,X 1-1:1 vlli�" �,'V -� � , I , - � " " , I , ,� ,, , , t �'--,-�X-I" �,- el , R , I -- , , - , , ZM,�� I - I. � t a 4, , , " , 4 , m , , - I-V " , o , " � - I � " "I � --,`--- - ,I I 11 v " � , , , " A Il- 11 , , , - 5 -1 ��, - , " I ,"I" - i <11� -, " " I - � �--��?��nl� � ",-��, � , I I I --lv-y - - - - 4, , , ,.' , -, I* - - , , I 11 11 I I , &li,L�, 'il� '��< '14111'�ll ,11 1 �,,�-;���-,�4- . �,,�" """,""�,�ll'� , ", ""Mg I - , I", I, ""I I �-�,,� , %�-,-z-===-�n'--�, I I - M " -gl AM -"I � , , , � , � , .� ;""-�,*�- , M14 "m IN% ,,',,- � , xlM-M&'l-',�'W',-, gf, , �Pft I . -4�-"- . - - - � � , , ,-I, , � - . - I I ,��la`nna_��7ZL-=-ZX�- F , -'��'--,.--,-----I �W= M-- =2�--�11--'-�lli�� � - - '- - , " Cl- , �, , , I",",- �' I � fl�l I - I - �,-� � I", ,,,-� " ;� -,I ---,--,,-,,, -- , , -'-- -7, � --- I "1, i7 ,�7'v I 11, - T �1p -----`;�-��-`""I , " . ,�4'0M P,,,,-, , I ilZsl�11SPI'll -,,,, " - 1, -, �l W11 ,I - . " - � , -,I",-� � �,,,� , -, 4 - . , , 7 -77 ,,, - � - - �,,"It � I * I ,, u � , , ,- , -0',',,,, -�"', ��,�,lv , '-"', I , ,;""e � , -,- - , F" m � , ����, , ,-,w - -1 , I 11 , I I I - , A" P � - I�-UnATI, ,, " , -- - � 7M "'.,," " , I I 1- ,,,,N',, �-,,-,�W, ,- , ,� , � � -- "-W, - - -V I � '- , �1 �-A 0 � ift ",k , , , , , , , �1`1'1 � � 4v W, I,, -�,,,,- I , I I ,� � I I .I I, ,-�V v - I v wl,��, ,I , , I I ",I "A "Rit , ,I,I , W,-;,,,- � , - " -__V.;-""',- , , ,�"'77,�tl I. - , ,7 T� ,� , , , ,�� , - ,�-'� I � p"U,-",�,� ,,,I ,�,,,,�, "�11'1�-O�' ,A I/,",I�le,llll�zeq"-f' " - all"�I I I , - I �, , !, e��,,,�:�, , A �"',.!"��,` -"],',,',��'�,"'iI ", �-k�k "�'1'1117111'I,< ," R"I"", ,� , , � " "I� I I �- , , -- I , 'T � - � , -/:54,-----%,"�""R - , �A 11 - � � ,�� 2 " �,, -, -', 'X -I Im " ,�, , "� ��"/Wm "I- 143,'�� �, -7v�,,�i�? �; _ � , , I " "I'll, -,-, -I - � I - "", I�,,""5,��"', - - - -1 - -,, t4 , " ,- �l I , , I I - , ' '--' I-.W� , - , J� , � , "`- "- "' ,,,- -"g,� ,Z ,, m '11,11', , ,� ,�- � �I.3� , 11, ---,� ,�" ,-� ,,, ,�,� , �" -"W" ,� ,e , ,,� 'm `� �'l ,-�, ",�,I��--,.?,�,`--S I ,,W�?,I4,,�-:� P ,� I� ,,, I � i'%`,","��,",�", a, ,� 'r,, , C �`,,�5,1, ,"," ;,Ill� I"In"',AI�, 1�01 �"Illl ,�, , I , I" V,�;",�,�' -,I�4�1,I -') -� I 1 �i-' ','&4m --""--,,-,-, - I " -- -.-'��li'�"I`',�, VI""ll ,-,% '5 , - ,,,I-�,-,- I I I "", - 141 -A, , - , A;,"�'� - , A�', ,� " _g� ,,-M,", ", - ,�I ,, Ill- X, " �;��g R, iIIIIW14 "I ". , " ��,�,,,,,g - , " - w m ,',�-�N-,- �,---I,J,I�,, - , VI"", � , I � , � � - _� -�.... ..�- ,�*,-��,,,��I -- 'I"", -I- �AU " ,,, - - -1�111, I I- " I-I",�I 11", , � � � - . V -"'I , , , - , " , , , ��-.- , a , -�,- , "I"%10`��" Il,- �,-,� ," i-I-11 Y'll, - ,-- � , , ,,,�,, --�--� I 1��I"I", I "I�'lll�I I -,�-,,,,V',� ,---," , , , I�1%11'1�11",I � ," �. , -� 1 I�R,14��,",Ut4"N't -,' --, t,'��e'� _,:, , e- q ;�- 'I , , , �, ;--t,, ,l � - � ", - '-'J�,g�',gs?,�-,-''-���- , ", 1,"16,�, --` ���`�'-g�', , :�- , ,-%I ,"A'Ik,�- "" � 'I, ,�?""'*:' �,, -R, ? � -:1"I'll '111'�Cm , , , , ", ,,, , -, - I e , "','' , ,- ".-* 11 , 11-1��.I�,�W,,,-, � ,T',!��, � , " " "", 4, -,: N - R ";-, " �� - - 1� �,�,-,�,FYA.- , , ,, , _I I I I I , �s � �. 'k � / , � I., ,� , ,� " J' ,,,;"�,� .L"_ � , ,I , �-,,-Mr� ,,_, ',�` I I --�, ER ', "'�lpll� � � ,� _Q", . ,��� , I,,I I I - � , , �,"'���,�, -,",A-� ,""-:,�,`,`;.� - , , - ,�,`- V ,<�, ,,- , �"Pl�",�,�"I'���,,t/,/P�',',':,,"-":�,,��i,, I 1'�'�"�t1l"It �, �,,�,��;4��,�,if�, 1,',�' , , , �w �11-,,, ,,,,�-,,,, � � , t , , -,I, - � �14- -,, , 1',��, �� , �- I 11 1-1 ', ,', k� ,,, � , �l',� I x I � ,I� �-,, lf,�%,.-�,�,"!!�;;,,, ,,�,I,, -;�', "t,I,'%",,,l, z -', ,,, '-,`��I'-,- , "�',',%�J;,�>,`�,I,��, , Z' -- -,�'�,' -,I'm,��--�;�',- ,�11,,, ,�15 ",ll� ,,,�,�, , � I, ,I,,, I "'�,F ��/-, , �,,, ," I'�I ,,,�-,� , , , I I I . , , "', " , , - - - �I, 71, , ��,�� , :�-`,, � ,�,"'� �w,1,��,� - - - , ,,4-� ,��,, , , n�l , � ," �,,,�S, I �� -`,-;,,'-V,,-, -;F ;, 4 ,W�W�-J` -,;, 10 , , , , - -, , �" Il Ill" M , 1, , ,,,,I , 'It , , "'. M, -,, - '�, 1,-,��-,A� �,�l , , I �I �� , ,,�,- 'I'll ,��, - , 1,- l>* ,��O,I - , �P,'211_?'_, " ��_ � r 4�1 �,�Z_� ,, r �� ; ", -W, ,�l'ZI " I ,�e� -'� , , , , . I - ""�% I�,�� d��--A��:- I - I _ " ,",/ -, I �,' 4 -'�,-� �gF§` N' N ,- , " ,� ", I I ' 'm , ,, --,-" "m"""""', , , , , �1�i,rlill- '�Nl,,�", I'' -�,--"-I,.,", ,-., ,`-" ,�, , "W, ,�,,,,,,,",/�,,,,,,,"?,�"",5,i a,, I� � �,I , 11 "'' ,� -M� "O - , - I `� " , , I 1'11`It� I ," "" - w lll- '�-, � ,I ",,�,, -11 I 11 1, 11 �----, OMI1111-, - "e.l�w•�,17,lz�,:---, , ,"M * 0 ' ,I 11 , � , S ,,,rto--,r,,�",eo" 'I Z " , 1� ,,, ,f -III" ""I ',��,11 I� ' , 7",,,,"' , -"' , ,,I I� - A- , � I ";;,, "- � - , I - �',�,�,"Olk, � ,� " I , '),II � , M, '? �k,""� "- ", ",�1�,,',- -, I'll, , , I - ,� , )f"" , - -"',ZI,,�,,,-",-, ,,, ,�,� 1, " ,,, ,�-, �...... ,�"�� ,� -',;��,',l ";�,,-,',v,',,,I � t, ,I ","', , � , , I" , I , lllll� ...I 2-1 "��`R-""--,-,,,��,, "'," -, hill , �/�A I ,z. " , , I I I 1"I"��,�c", T,� -- 'i ll-�- I;� , "� " I . ,11, - � ,��j�i��;,,,,��-,,Q� & ', ,,,, ,�;w"" , , �, I ,,, I � "�7XI - � , I , --- �,,,, m, -, 7 ��5 -" IN' I/ - I - " ','�,S I, - �j�, ,g ,,, �,, �� ,., � " , �� ( �- ',ot - , , �X'�',�",�-,-�N�,111-, " is -7 �P`T:;-�', I- .�p , , -""� �' ,,�,' ,"�', , " , ,,,,��, M , A", - � 7 07. ; . ,�,,a �- ", ,, , V," , t Q " -4"a I .1 t6d " - , 7 �, ,47,-- "'�--'l-� I , ,w ",� , , -'�', ,f,�o',--,,,�--'-,4�7-,�"I-11,�' '� M 5, '' � , ,� ,j� 'no I I " ,/ � "" M I , ,"-w �,I�� "', I , ,W, ,gy I I ,,, , � " ...I ",,r �._�,�.......-, '-lk-��l -, " , 111.� , li�wi�N - , ", , x � , - ��: ��,,% " , ��11A k 1A, --I& Al�� I I wl�l -,�'�,, �- I IS ",",) _ ,�- 'm , �� -, 5� �,--':--,�I "Q1-- I - � ,`-,- l%;, -- ""' � ;M/Ri ff,`�-�l" -' ,>, ��� � 1�-ll -, - - W � 1, .1 I_7"__ ",---, " . t I ll� "I-�,� 1, - I - " ' -�-, ,,,, `342`,�-, , , -4,- go"M Il"E , , , ,, , , , 101 , , I � , ,, I I " " ; , - 1,� , I IV, ..,-I I �- "I�I � " " - , '4 L, � " � �W , , - , - I I I , , , I I ZA , � , "Imm, , ...... ",1�1- -- , , -, ,�- -�A-1 , , � ,� �, M,"WRa- � , 1�,' `I,,,'� ,� ,,--,,, I P i , "I'S-;,,'� ,�,",,�-"4,�,"",,,,'�',�, ll'R�I " - - ,-a" -, , "'.], � -� ,� , - , I - - I I- - -5�" - -- , '- -, "- !j,j,.,�,,3,,, 'u, - �,,- " I, "� , , 'RXI,/- I -�, M�-�,,I- ,", , , . , I , ��'111'1 I I � U , - , A- , - , - 1-14", � �1- ,,,, 1�1 �qg "I"�--, , I I Q�-,,,,,� ,,r,-�f j"t'-""o, ,,��,,� I ,� ; , 11 N -1 , , *�4r-`��N`-�;',-, I -�,'--,�e , "O"', I �'a 1�'� "�`�',,,, ", ,,,, ,,� ,- -,�,, , : � , � �v � I- , I 1- 1-,Z�'.I, '11 'p,, , , , I ' ' I 11 Z Own I, , -, ,,,,,,�'�,',- ,",'�,��'��,','�',�'i,��',,�,,-,'.',"; �/,�,�� I"I-,�", � I -�� -, ", , ,��W,"al,'A�,,,�, 1 �l -"W � - -lllln�'i ,, �I, il"ll �I- I - '', /,11,X,-- -,II-11,5a,clI;C " ,- `,��,',I', �, �t�',�,�,,�,, L -- ,- I I 11, "", I , � -�'?�' �,, -3�� �',,',',� ,I -", " ,,-%o , -" , �m;oft- "'-11 ,� �I, -, f-'- , �, �,-, I ,-", "'I"'I'f-,:�,',',,,,'�,`�,', , '05, ", �"'�',:1 ... �, , , , - �, ��""'�,l Ill-I Ill � , � , ", �. I'-Q, ---01',� , '" ,R", ,,4 I, �,&',hn--'k 1'�"� I�I �I ", � I,- - I ,, " '1� - � �S ,, ,gk, j� ," , ,,,, , - , -, ","sin %, ,I'Il g1g, , ml P, QW, lil- - "-�115'11 �� �,4 , , � w'' �, '' , - - I':', - , , I,5' � I'M . ,�l I'll, d-Z-� 34 ,',� ,� � � ,:,;4 , ,, - ,,, ,-,"',"S ,��, , ,,�,I, ,,,,,,:, " , W"R, A � -�� ,,,,,���, �,, ,�,,,�k� I ,,,�� " "N ,4 ""'14"" ,PP,,��,,'%`It,� ,�, 211" "), - - 'I- � , ", , ,, .j�....... ""r , I- `I -, �- ,�,�,,�'�; - ,e Q "I - , ,,,-�'' -,'�' � '�/l �;,`�'m ,,',�,;,,,," ,�� , --,','�A, - , , � , �R , ,� - , �� �, I - 11 -,'- �A , � 2;� ls'a,-' 1 11 -, 111 I , , , , ,e " ,� � I I , I , , "', - """"'I'' �l � I I I -� ;i,� &�' ,�, �,� �,J, �" ,'�,',, , 1, I " � � ,�, I p 4 1-,-� ,�,,, --TWP:� ,�,'�-,IM" �M I."� ,,�,-, ,� , I,Il , , I, � , ,,I,r I "W -/.'' , � q, ""'M - -�`11� , " , ,, '�;,�, !�- , ', ,�Q,t�,�,,l -`q&��1�1, ; �,� I 1-��'ll I I�I �,���,'-- , 'I", , , , I, ,--, ��-5��,-- - ��'�-"'��,� ,",", ,-�ft, `- , " , ,; ,"I � � v , �, �4ffi ,, , , Al -, , " " , � �� '.�� -� ,�" ", - "I , , , "', - -2v-,;-)0ll � , . I - ,6 ' ',��,�,'��,�-'� - Z'2, , I ,,',,�l ,- -&- ����, , � � �� "I...... - I . `�'i"""'sRMV,�, , -1-TE, , ,, - � " ,-,, ,"', � ,�,��r, I ",� "z � ,I,�"�, ,,,�i-,,, , , ,-I-2 " ,ig�lll' ,�,,��"""- , rl�I"-- � , ,,% ,,,� - A �", - , I ' I � ,&�Oi "'��,,�,2,","�,,,�,g , ,�" I `Illlll-��-1 ,I......K,,-,, "ZI, '* 4 "m 11 ,I i�"",�,-`�, Io, - I " I,,,,-, , " 1, ,"R A-��, I �-4, , ,"-�,,;,I,", ,��11�� 3- ,I `-,-�-`,�,`�" I ,A: - � 11"1-v.,"�,-�I -,�-�, ,:"'' � , � ., I'I," I""'I ,�-�f, T,�, �-R&,��w�,� j�,," " I � , " , I� �l 1,11-1 1, , - - 5,� , -��, 1,11 1'1111t�- zqj�vvg , - , , �� I I ,�11,,,,,, , , - "gI Ir", �-,,,,, 1, , 1-11.11 11 - I"I -1,- V-1 I-I �l - �` `- , , � ,- 'g, �b I �-I 1 �"a,:�g,�,�W�,,,-" - - -- - ,- - 11 ,- �','", ,�,�-- -'W"A I 1, ���1;", , . �", �� I , , � ',-, �� �JI'n _ " , 'M�F, �l I-,- , � , ,�l -A - :ll"ll I � I , - (�1! ,; 4", ,-�,, ,�m�,�", I , ,,,�g- I , �z �:, - ,r I I ,, �I. :A�Z`l ,��-I I - , U,�M',,, . - I '� , � 11 ,I I, ,� ��,��I ,i � - 1152", I �- - " , - ie - - , -,I,-�- " I ,��,",� , I I , - , � - I,, -� � :,,-, , - ,� I - , , - ,.r ,, �-t - ,lg �. I I - .c " , �'k"`t ,/ - ,- I I I - 11 � I "! - ,- � �� -I � i �`-�I ,;"!"-,''�,"," �`,�l ,,,,l/ " �� % �;`/'l",'-';,`-i,,,,WP�2�`, ,,� , , , � ",li'qM�, ", , �� ,, , - - - , y Fes,, V-1 , � ,4 " - � I ;,g4,m� --- -, V, , ,�� - , I -� , - ,- � ", � 11 -,"', ,'�,,;, �, , / ,% ,,',,,�'!�,/" , � ":- I , I - 1, ,��"-`,, , � ,--V - , I-,��,�'` ,:",7,.,,,`-, --- v W"I I . - ' .,i , � w-,A, ,,,,,� ,* �',dq�g,LI;�: I, ,�', �m ,6 � ,�', , , � �W> --� "I A a, - 1%,""', ""I��- , ' ' , ® ��� ,;��,,�-", �,-,,,' ' tb,,�, ;r,*�,�,� , ,,, Io�-�qq- , , - 7,7� h >11 t� , Il W 'IM " � �t i, d 'r�11 , ,,�-�,,� � ' , '-,- � '- - ,S t _ � "Ill `�,�O't -" " -11k -. �,,&� 11 11 S,I, -114 . g'�,,II ' ' I I I 1 ,R-� - , " ,�*,_ _ , -r , �1' .11 l-, "-- --�, EVA - ,,, , �, "-, -tg ��,, - ,1,-Ile - . R ,I Y-1 I I ,__�,'l , I � ,�-� �A "�-"- 'm', "'I', � � -�-,g-,� -, ,5 ,�"W, ,-,,�, - 4- , , I I - - �,,"7-1- -1, - , I , -�l If "s, , I I,� -� I 1� I � . 111.1 I , , - � -,-� , , - I , - -, - , " wu " `� , � �'�g !, " �-- ,- - -,-� ,-- If ,- , - 1�% I �., � ""IlIPW I 1-'� - , . - , " � ,- � ,,, t"V,10 :, � -M� �,-�-,!�n ��- ,Mz',II-�� , I I� ,c ,, 1,-`, �-�, ��`I'.�,� , � � , - � i�lX - , S� N '11111-4 -1 � ��*-- 7elIff I 1 ;1., � ,R�14 , ,� -- , - , *q IN - - - -, - --A, , - I I , - , " , -, If, - IF , '- , - 11, , , - - , 11 - "I:- ,- M, ,:, ' 'I , ,`�l , , " I'll, " I 4, 1 11 1� , ;�, '%I . -,�,'Sl, " , I;��- ,�,� ,7-,,,��I�'�,l......�, -, - 4,,h ' ' I I �' Z , .... mv --� ,- - , , � , -I...... ,� ,,, , �,,,� v , , I I I" .-,-,-;-_ ,,,, 'X , ,,,,, I- I , ,,,, - I , 4, 11 i� , ��: ',,�,"j,",;_ I - 'R , r�I����-le- " � I ,�� """ - -111111411 I '*- - , , I , -- 17, , , � ,,,,,,--- --I ls��l -�, , ,��-4-,��,��, I , I,, , , I � I " 17 � a- I I e --,� - � , 11 � � , I ,,, - I '11"." 1, , M-W-l"1, : , It-l-II , ", � �, - , 11�11 -I I I -- - , , I wV,-I, ,,�-",g,�t, ,,--� ":',",t"-" ;" "', , , ,"""', , � .�ll I I I ,�- ' ; I%� "�-� T,I I "-�,l I I , -m I , I -',, 1�1 " ,w R, � I , 'Am , - - I � � , "", , " .,' m-"-''-M- 1z I VVIII , I 2 -� -� /, , " ;ll" ,,," �-,", ,' 1'�, a , -�l , , I I�� --� I ',�, ,�, �, I�, 0 ,"I" , ! , �11 , ',�,'�,l 1� ,� � �, , , , -- , , " �,-.'-,�,,,-, , %�;, ,�l � , , . " , , , In -1 wl'g ",I - I 1. �11 v"', ,,,%"',�� SM1^061, 1, �ww ,, I'm -- ," '� '&'�, Y�, ,�"'�,I,s I -, , %' V,I-, _�� , ,,4g, X, " , - - , , ,- , , I-\",7- §rl":,'>�-I I , ",", ,�, , , ,�,'-qfll'l 30111--l'-ull", .-! 1 , , , " , -Al. , IN" ,,, -, " I I �, 5�,Q�`,��,- _ 4',--� -T, , _ , �--�p " , I �,O ,?�,e,l , i! " , vmz`�V'� �,191 Ill,", ", - $,I�,,-� " 'A " " I Ill,"I - 1, �,�,� I§ >� I Q� --"O �Q " , � - P,,�,�,,�, � I ,11", � .... , � -m , , , , �,-W�s�,` SI" ,,'-, , �,,,-�,-,,�, I - , - % "" , ,�,% I 11 I �I, I,,�j,'�, ,, � , .-Il , I-11�T,,I, �4��v,I� - :� .,,,'� M'S qff��I I 4, � 11 � 1��'--;�'. �,I--- I "I 'll' '111� - � � ---" �, � - - " I the "O ' <�",411 �I` " , '%� , , 11-�, ,- , - ,I I , , ,I I , "M*-� , "4<,"�ll"��-,>","�z,,':'�,,; , Wi � I�' ,"�� �l , - , , , I I , �- ,: , "I a, 'Y -� � *-""",,�, I-, ' ""' ' " ' '��', �' -�i ",� , ,,, ,;;,�,,I - � k , �,,,-v XgI'r,�,,' ,-,, �'I�,� 4,w,,,Z��g ��' ""�;�.?, -.,,- -��,-,`,,� W10I,, :�, ,4 1 , ,,, ,�,;..- - I " I � I - �-1� � I A � - , ,,1,� A"AimiI1-11 ,,9V,'� I 11 ,,��;,,, �I - x�,�- -� 1, 11 -�V, ',I "o", , , ,,_��:, I , e .1�,I,lll ,"�, , �Z�l; " I "I"-l', I' l I � I �' -, , ::,i� 91 Z, , ,IN- , `� Y �w 0-, " , g�', I '-, I , ,� �-� , ", .,.,,-,�-� '��, I'l, . i ,z,c e ,l r ,/,,- n. - � '7�XIp��i,� its ,;"�"3-tt "`�' "I""" 5 A"I, ar-,�, "ll- b "'I" 1 I711 ,- ' ...... , `-', ""A er " ", �[ -,"`�� ��y -,� ",,,,& 0 �,�1"'Al--v"', - ,�" ",-�,!, I "a�'�, , ,I�,�A - -�K, I ,,-�,0 ", -" , :�: ,o;�,,`�6�74-70 ." " '�t,,',',�,,t ,,'-, "M*"", ,,, , �m � �, 'a", � ! -% , , �. k �-, , , ,N I,, , ,"'I � � , ,_�, � - I, ,, - , , - - I "�,- , -��.-',, - , m', v,,II iA-�,ll...� �� -v" S ec I -�Il" Z I ��, A, - �_O�-', " �� , wt, 1, , fts� I 1'� ��, " , ll� '-1111111 , -' ' j 111 � �'m 'il - 11, .' " I a , �,, � �,V-�, , �,,,- I A ` `-C-,M,--�,-,, "I, �,I& ,� ,-�, , �l , -�X' "" �, �W 'M'Ip ,:, IW, - -,�,K ,% - ,I,W111I � , ' , ''�t,lm,,F`1 ll-1 4 4� -1 ,-VeIII Y, 9 , , ,�.,,-��,, X!� �` ,���- .,`�N",5-'�� ,I 'I,"_, ,, _,� , , � - " " ,11111,� � , 11 -t,w , , --.�, ,III � _� ,� , " ,_ � -, , , , � , " -1,11 - , �, M m " � "'��' ," I, " - ,i�--'-'-Z, �� "M /, N- " ` , -�"� ;, , � ,�", -"-, , �, ?,,' - , , , , � " I- , "'Kt ,-�":,� I "" EM ' , - ,,� , 'M �- "'T"Ir,,,,"", -!R'- ",��'q�"'�-'�jI 1, � ,�Pllf I �; - Ii 1.1-1A - j�"Gf'',-, , ,�� � ,II, , -"Mm- - ,L�,I_ -,- , I �- I- I ,1� 7:11 -',� ,'<' ,i,,�`,�', , - - Z WR,, I"'Al ,I�� - " " , - " " "'a"'I"i" , aw" � - M , I a , , �l - I I 11 IrW,W&�,l,,,-,'''.' �� , I �i t,,,��,�' �/ �, I 31 I '-,�,I I,, , ,, ,V I'l--l-,"" , � -1, , , , , � , MK "M , � , � ,� -� , " , , i�� --I - , -- ,I,RK , ,I � -�,�a m,z,�,I -,,z ME -,,�,-�11 1� ,I, -- 1� I - I - . A,�'-'-- I� "I R "5, �,,, viAw,I ,,;�I,�,-,,,',� � �,,��"111` "," -- ", � ,Mi'll, � ,�1�1 I , ,",":', , . M"A '- r6,,,,,,,-->*�,� ,,',��,��,',-', 1 M 1 -A, 1, I �;I� - �,N 1'l"I , I�I� , , ., , - I �W- � %.,j�'I, ,11 , � ,"I'll, A�,,,,W,�,�R , -, -I " , f�,-"gg-� 7"3WWU T, "I , ,j'L,�I" � - "I�--IX I , "'7*',&A ,, "", -",I I ...... -IN", z , � � , Wll/,IXNI'11�1 ,�I�i,l ,, I �,-, - - , m &, ,-, ,� 3A I , �v��,7, i�,�I�v VW11", -:,,�,. �?-'�T-11;mllll'l , ,'I� I w " -�., ,IT �, , , , -,-'-�- - , � I �10 ,"Aw , r -,, , " , - W,��,!, ,�'l , , I -� -" - 1� 2,111 , ��'� - � ,�,k , �gR,,� ,"','g,�', �- , p," , , A �I,,, 116 Aar 1 � P,- - , , �" , � ��� " , � , � , - , , , ,- Imj , .. ,- , I , ', I J. 11 11P'l I - � ��,-I-� . ��,�,,' k-I I ` "Ill" �W'I,?,�,U, , 1,";- "o � ��,,��, �'lkl_:1'� -A-" � �'� ,IV , 11 , I el" " -gRlmr ," '/',�n,`�,'�,v ,�;-"- I��:K -, " , jg'L,� - �','-', ,,"t , I , , , - % ... ,, , 11 ,�,"'? ',�!`S 9 I , ,, ,- � �4 ,��V' I ,�,"I''ZPN� , -;, � ik ,, V , � Oil , J1, ,,� 11, , g"--gagg" I I I , " 'I�'k,if,I��, M , - -1111"'�,_ �� W`��,-�- "I" ,� I I �, I I - �, I- - -", I `,,�,"�I�,"I-,.-,'�11 ,,IJ �, """ , �1-1 I �� 1� 11, -�,I,I��,`��,�- ll�-- -- tli� I; ,,,, ��l - - I - , , -,""I" , ' '' I, - 4, L I, ,/` ,�'-- ---......ve I',- -l" I .", ; -,-ll, - - ,- , I , ,�, ,, -,l 1z " I - - I -, �," X"'I'S" - , - ;.�'% , -�-, ,�x I IMR-2-�I M ,, , , -,., -, " _�, , ,-� � � , �',%� I �l I - r 4 - ,,,,I-A , _ 'I , ,,��/,, ' 't-AA, , , -,-- �- ,,, , _u,;, ,. �,, I �.......I-,--,d,--�� I, � , ,� ,.-, , f" ,,, It �- ro . , � -� I'll 7: � ,", ,e �,�,,,,,,,,� s I ,o I --� � � i, , " 'n � �'-" ,�,,, ,--,� ell I�p, �I"',','s , ,�Ir, - , - ' I, , -'I I 11 - � �- e ", , ,,, 11 I.- , ,�� �'��,,'? c, - � , ,7!�� , -; I�� I ao, ,,, , i taut vxr,e. ,.,r , ,,,o ; - , W , 1, -,#�",,�,�'',t',�,�, � -, , , , I, y'- z� , �-S 2v "'W" I � io::,- ,� ^ - , .""I -�...... '. ,,I, ,�,', I , � 1, I �'- - � 111, _ I - I,�n ,, - ,� � 0, � , , , , �- 7,� " -",- � ,,��', ,� , 'I �'-W'411`11" I I " -`�� ,I, ,�z - - I 'll �I � I - I - , - - -INR, , �h "'i 'h -,,,'"�" �,� - ,�4-: "IIs, , AV, ,� -�A I � -, " -Q`,�,,'�,,, 'W' 'ZIN � .11 I , , � 5T;g '� , ,,-, - `�,TiW-,,,NMIN�LR --M-nw _� , � , 0 ' ' Ili -', , ,Iv�,"'��4�',,t�V'8 ,�zlo, ,,;�,`:� I, a - " I , _ � , - ,I.,�, �W�, -� , , � �, NK I� �-1 ,�,� ., , I xl�I I- � -��� ,-:, " 9 .,�-n- ,�'-',�� �, --- I � - , - 11 1.1> ''I", 1��;Olp �M'- �', "-- Ir -'�,,�- -- ' "',, , r ,-,, � ,. �,, 1'�," � a e ,V-� - ,t' , �`F n b)�, N,, ,!,',3__ , 11-1- - -I , -- G �. , ,- �- G � , ��, � , ,� 1, I I '111'11��l 4M,- `�t4," , "In , / �",!�,� - ,,,I,, ,V/� , , , -,�'�',' 1, -,'�- ,, " �- - , , ,, I - , ,fi " ,V A , , I - I " "",�,gi��,�j 9 ",- " "'elf", , " " 1'��,I,� , " - - I-1 MV 1, -�: ,,,, VKT,�� � -,, -"��,N,V,� , �,�q I," ...�I -�-4:�-'-Wh4l, , - II,,1, � . �'.lkl��Ill'-N- , -,� , I - , I 1, 11 z . �� �', '� �"T-",��, ,�-, mq,� I ";,-, , ,,-,-,lF",,-,\k�, ", I - , ',���I',- I -, " � , " � , I III N ,'" " . -I','�,,11 ,�,, "I'll-,�,-%�AEAE.w� 'Iik" , , ". , -,� - ,, "'m ,k' , 11111' I '> , ,,F -lZ ,"' , , ,,, , �', " " , � I ,f , -1, - ,�',.-, , " - -��,I" �"-Q,.:'��""�' -1 "', 6", NO ',�'A' ,'� `,�,�,,,,N',-',',�l � - , - � \i�,,'yf'f�, �,�I,, - A 111- - 111?1�111',�N;-,��,- v I- -W,m �:, � �� ll�Ill ' 'I" i , - -,1,�11�� � I.''> , ,-,'-a-,`,, I I I� 11 QF J, '�" \",-!� " -�I- �11 \m ,. - .fI��'"Im - 3 � � I I ", -:51i'm 5,�" -��A-�; , :, ,� � � -, ,i �-""M I"-, a k � I, ,-�--,"� -�-",W,��,���/-�,?-"�,',�":"I�,�,'��,,I��,��,�,,���'', , I , " , '' , --�- , - ,\,,-.,%,'r-_ �,I-& -_�g' �--,-�,�,� 'm'-V,,%'4"- �I�,,,q, ....... ,)-,,--", �� I � I,"�' " , : - �- , "'ll :,3�,I-"�I, , M ,,�,, ',"�,,-, �,ks��-e,\�,�1 " , ,k, 11-m � x "I'll , �;,'-,It�-�,,;`,141,- , � , , I, " igp � ,�,, I 6� I'll,ll`,����,-� I,`��, �, ro "A I.,�,,, , � "Ie""I - , , �, -, I �,I,��,N',Z "��,I ,, I ,;��,--45,v , � ,-""4",,"-'k"': -,-�,,,�,'?`-4,�,,Z, - � � - , -, ,;V4��`" , ': ,,, , ,, , - , �,�I,W�' WK p -, ,,"- - -3"e", ,qp-',,,I,,,�;�_,- j, �g -4',;' 1 't',�:�,��,,I:�,�','��;- "16 " � , �,, i,� 14�,, �-� ,�; IN ,,,�,;, , - ' - �UN"),�,1'1'1'I, ,, -,�,�," 1, --l-,,:--.." � - �;,",�P$� �--�,I,,11>>11 Z/1,11" , , , ' '�'� N,,11?T"'M'lVXl"ll,�l'-kl I,, , I N Mv� '��", 1- ,1:4�-I-",-`IlP" - ' ;"' 'j'p �� � I IV* , ",,,,I � , I� ;, �:�," ,-�,,'T, I I lll�, � I,r "',Y, -�O,-I �,-"� -� - ,, <"',,A, 4- \�,I,,,,,�,,I-� ,, , , 1,-Z�R , S ," �i�N � ','�y�i,�,-'I �� . I-I , - I 1&,14-1'-,-�,11, -� - , ? " il , /I""', ,�IWP , � ,V-11-11 ', 11 w - , --�w �,-,��',- � ,-,,"-,, - ,FI/11,�, - -% A� , �,m,, -",� , - "m - � R , -, I W,,,, ',,��, ,,!l , � �� � - � ',"-� I ,xs`,j�,-f�*,,, - -'S?','j"Q�;`g - , - ', I , I -:,-�, -`�'-` �s'��`�- RA ' ,, , ,, Y-",9M,q ,JQ,�� , ,� 4 1 ,,, I ,�� i� w , , - I ' 'Ill " , , � , �, " .�> ,� , , - � � , ,�, - , Z , " , '"'I , �-,,'-,, , ,� � � �� ,I\ M, ml',�,� ""'I"11,11104I - � ,P ., , , I 1����a I I "" I .jI"' - . �, ,� - ,,, \ 5"��"":,�,Ir:� , I ,�, ram. , t'<'�',,� ,�, � ,,�,3�,,� -,g"-��% " � � , , , . , �& , , ,-Il� .- 1� , , -, , ,I 'ij�orl,t�!,�':,,,- ;;,-,I- ,-,�, 'U >Ir", �,,, ,:� , "� "" - - ,� , " l."ARw " , - �, -� ',�,�' A It "S rl , -, �, I ��-��.... .. I� I I I I I "'N �w , ,� ,x " �, ,, , I; ,�,,�x , " " ,,, - ,,o '�fl,,,j , '1�,ll��l - "g I �, ,�,A ,- 'I �,/ ", "--�g,' /"�`>,,I,, ,"�-�',- ,;�161,� I -��)"),,�I" ""'m -, tero, , �, � 2 ", r v ,4 '�- """'", ",/" , , , , I P,�3"-- IX-, - ,, g*-I....... - ",,� , ,�'t'rlk , .� � 0�-�L ,, , "O/n-- ""', -z , � ,,,,i, � -- ," , I I�,Al- -1,Iw 11 I I--v ,,,, , � - � , B ,-,�V, ,","I, "-,-,Aglf��, �- "" , - ", "5 I , , � " -�- - #,"", "� �-�,,N, '�","��� ,�,- "I"t"I'l ,": ,:, -- - , � , I ",-" I � ,O-I -e-,- ��� ," ,"'A" �:,�' , ?;V'l'l-'V , "', � Z�A%g,�',' �-',I, J*A- 1111��l I'll ,"', , -llfll'-,`�" 1, , - o'� , . ,q 4� - -,4 , - , � !771,�, �D"��,�,<,�',��,,�",/�-,-,-,�'i� , Ow � A" � -, ,�Fl- '� ,r-"'�-�"",,�'I'�io'�,"',��;�V,,"",I �, li 'T' ', 11 1,�"a 4 � , 1, , ,� - � � - I "' , 11 ,�� , R - , ",�- I /- - *k�,,��� ,ly ,:� " E I I I -�,',I " :�I,�','�'Jp���,JIAW,0-1`�,`- `Rt�,-,,,,O! '� � ,, ,�,:-I-, '-��".��I- �11 IK",� ,1- ." "" �1141,, ,�,:I� "'00 "i�,�,,,,,,-,'MI K", � � gt*,��,,,- "" ly" I,"" �,� _,� ,I �' , 11\4 A � , � -', �11!, ,ip - - I ,, " , I o I I " p�w,, ,f " ,, , I -" , -'-I ,1111 I ,-,, ,� , , , , -�,I III,t� , - ,�,Q-I, ,,"",�,,,".,�r- ',�,��, ' , , - I ,�'. ,If/,,- ", � ,, , �6 -";w`V , I . , , -, ,- , � AF� "Y --- .V " _, '_�'__ ,," �� , -,,,,I't , , ' I � , ,, �- 'k�", ,,, I ���-,,, . -�-,�,,`, "��;-�', ,�,-,� �z �-... , I , ', P, " , " " �;�M �, 50*5'1.1�1�-kV, M - , �§k�. �: , � .... A"k,� ,,� , �z 1�'l�9. �, I w".�"All.I'll"IT""', 1�,, ,', '�. , '' _0 - 11 - . �� " "', ,,'' , .ft,_ I I V Vl"fg, iw- ".�l-�,'-� -J, ,-�`��X'f` ,��I,�"�,�- - ,,, , '� I -, ,��, , ,� 11 ,,,Nl�- - , , ,fh�,, ">;-�'I I �-- $, ---:,". 1,111111-1 " - � ,- , " ,-I--I,-, I,'0�.A --O�,- - "TV-1-1 11 I� ��1�"N,I,�'-, I 111-- - 11 "N ,"T,�,, !�,-,,��,"Y"", - -, I _ , , , , , ,/ -*5% W - ,-��'l I�'M - , - 'e� �l �I,�5,e� , N ,, �, " ,, I I - ,1-�,&,` ,,,,, I ",�, ,��t, n"",K�,n�,Pj",C- ',/"', - - --/,,, "', , , , , 1; -11,IN"ll- - � � � I I i-p - I �l 111- I I , "I, �", I� "I, , 'w ,`i,g�,�,; � /I% 0 , �,F w- � , ?� " -, w- I -A " �: I il�VOUII��,4-1�1'1;" I�lv",l ,/... , , I �1�110,,11,5;�� , �- "A I - , , , -P�-1,-,�A I --I\111;� - � 11 I ,-11111-I- C_ ", - A, -Ri",-I", -,.-� , - ", , - � I 64"t 1�4.1 ","ll "I'll - ,2 ," ,>,, - , , �, I -va � >a M-1 ;% , "I v-1 11-1111M��,� , , - � , :I'----,'-,- ",--i"I"12"w" ,jwV,?"" -, , -4, ?, I"W''A" �10 '113R�1111I , - , -�, -" , " 5 I , - 'i , , ,W,I 1-11, I- �l - � - , -'�!,,,,�`-� "', 'M I 3. � `�' '� !',-',�-",- ;0,� , , ,"- I e;l , ,-,,,M 'N' "', �,, 'All, , `,',!��,,,,'��,'I I,,�'j�:,!- ",I,,- �'�,"'� 11 , , I m"ll, ._'I ��,'�' --'�-�A�-- - '-lg- � I , , ', , , ��',� - ��A , ,�- , - , ---, >-XZ'',�,,� 1`1-b4h,I�11", �IM I � ;I- ,W 'A " " � , - ,� � I ,4 �,MqN"'k�- �4� - - , I � � , ��i'.I\""�`,�'�'�-- ��y",r�, ��,�,�,!�,,,�-I ., , , eilly 101*\,�",1,, I , � , I *10 ,,, -, '�' w 00�lr,,.,� , , - �X- ,, , I",''O,"'I"�aj',��',' , ��','�rl--��l ,�,�ll�I �,��",:,��, *�!�' 11 511 , , I�,� ;MKSM- e ,"K, I , IR, , , � �,�, i I Il 'T � , �,�,-�',�'N,," ", "" I-� - -,,I1, " ,`�,�,:',,-l-I-- � ,:,-"","��',,',Y,"t--��?�,,-�(\,�,- �-- , I -,"', ,',.v� �,-�,-&��,, ,%-&,- ",,,I 'j, - , I "v Of � N ��- - , , " 1� I I 0,`T��,,,,,�,i,,I, ,� , , " �I�ON, - �--'1111' X 11�'ll , ft�, ,� , " � , I�W I � 4 , 19 'I- -A'" ' "m ,A ,-,�,Ji, W, , i 12 E � , I ,I � , ,-5 _ % , �v - ,� � ft, - I'll I I--I-,,� ' 'm ,A,V,L�,,,',� , �- "",�", ,,," ,_ .R N ,- � & ��'�'�"I �" ""'k ll' ' I I � - � � " , - I , �,M�',-�"j��'_I*- ,,, ��,'�,-,',,"-�.,i�l , � 1"N', "30 , , ,, :gPk','-', , ,,��-'�I,�,',,,',!,�,',�Il I" ,- ,11,�', -, 1, r, ," I- - %���,,, '. �-"�,�",�', X&W�jt ':", , �, -1 -II , It I I I " nkit, � , ,� ', R��,, - �A, �t ,-P� �,,<R , 5 I 4,111" 'Zll� , . , " , I -- WOR - 11 , , '� "N I,-- 1T ,"R,IO" \." , "' , I " ,R '" -;; �,'�.grl-!'--, -- , --,- -"�-`�' " , -, , , , , I I - , ,-,, ,11 �,�- I , I 'T_ " . , , , , , , I �--� �. - 'A&, ,� , -,,,,, ,,II, , �,-�- --'I�l , -lj,'�'-,�,�,-` , ; �,-` , 1 , 11 I I I, " , ��, - , ,-,, ,W , - �� , , �f- - - 14 , � ",I, - ,, I , ,� . � ,, , k -- - ",II . ,, . - , - - �0, 11P "� , , , "�:,:";- - , , ,, �- -, , 1�1��`11114"� ll � : ,�, X,l �, , , , - - a , I -, ,;� 'IAYII,O�, , I MR, -�--, ,j , , 'I- � . N , �,,>-�-, - "I , \ I I I 11 I , 'I"""', A 1 ","I � ,I,�"` -Ail- , - --- . , ''. ��- - , � ?Nla� ,-- I,"",I, -, , 'I'm I "', ,,V�� � I, , ,�� - , , ,,,�,I�f�I,� . , � - , " RI,1 4,11 1,ZM �, -� ��, �, -� ,,, -, , I , , �- - , "Al W�- � Y,,�'111'��, I A , ':Tx �--,,,,'",,',,,,' , - "a ,'>,, , 2"',- "",_,", �I -" -- ,;,�,,_ , - e II-,",w,I-Ql- I " a,,"� ,.%- � - , v, , , " , "''�,�W'li,\ ,-,,,,-"-r�?'A, " , I -- " ", 6" Ima, g ', , " - , - , - , - - �o- , , � - - , , - , , ,-,"-* , ,,-� ,, `�� "ll"E", -, "65 --W , , �,;-,",A �RlAvx',�,�-, "' -�,-,, ,;�'-VIM "Ism, -1 - A , , , ,I, M, � ,Wn'01,11i , M, ,� ,�',,,/�p I � , , i� %F,� g,,-� ",, , , ' 1-9 , -Q,"", �2"",- -;�',�,- '�,'�I,i, " I I I 11-I'llb-I"I,,,� k -*, , ��,& I"', ",", / ,��-�', -,- 'S �: -�- ,*1 ��-�,'�,-�` "', ',`- �,g--'',"',K�-,�tl,llt ),' -, N, � , , � I , �- , 2,0 ,, , 0?5 , ,"""," ,"�,�� ,, ,,,,�r� 4 ,��,�-',,�,',�' IX� ,� , - I , , Z, � � NO �� " - 1�I �, ,'� -,� 11 I w-�,�,-,, gz""',,,'r,: - " z�,,�,O,,�, 1, `-i, ,"),,,� ,�", �,�,j�,-,', , I I I'll, 11 1-MIll, I-I I " ,- ", , , d -5- I �%P," � ,��:� ,L, ,- �� -,"",* -g,-"ql-<�," t, A, " , ,` , !,� - t � , �_ I�� ", , , - 11 ,;,-�, ,mrx, , I,_ ,�, -- Wl�/-1� "!��", 11, , - , 1, "- ,A'�,�,--/� I �-'x� -5, ,11 'ft',,,'X� - �" ,: `, �M,� 1, -t, �,� A , I! , , � , i � -,"�- I " -"" - .- "� , If M',"'I �, , . , , , ,, ,� I 5 ... , ,,j w , " �- � `�,,� , ,���l-�?y",r,a�"%'��",",,,, -a""":,MMf,R M,-, -,��- ,�- g I - g, �'_',-, "',",""" - .-;� � ,�--:,'„fix,,,.., "It"'M .' , f,3,161 1, --1'1��,�, III k , , , ,"''., -10,1�� , I e ,t�, � " z � . , " , '�' _�'��', ill�1.1, ,III- ,r,I --�, " , , ,� -, '�',R, `�,"%vv, ".," V1, I I 1 PARN"NIX 1 �10 S.11111- I , ", ''o - 7��T!W I ,M, I, , i I , -V3, , - , 'Y g � - , I g_1, , -,--m,w"--- 1p", �- - ��o I-�� -,-- - - " -I,� --- ,4 1-- I � ,�' 'pi -Z,�,� ,-",1-� ,,,, "t, , � '11-t-,1�17'11,1`-�'11'1? 1 m \> , ;-'- -,:� " I�L, - ,1115-1, ,"' I � ,�,,R�,'U� ,, � ,,--,�2 ,kl,i, ,;e'Zl\\M,,, , , " I " I_:i,,.� "', , , ."""'I'l", "I, ,,��':'%� , , ,,,,,, ,,, - � V, " � , � �'--' , ,- N I- , 41 �l ,,, , , I ,� A'_%, ?� "-�I�', ,-,�,,,,, Il,� 'l" ,V� ll`-,I�..- , ,k�i, , 1, , , , ,,,, '4 I I " I , , , �7 , - , - -��- ,t ,�, , -�,�Vww - �� , �I, -""I., - KI�", - -�I, --, ", m 5,V - - " "f, , j, - - I ;�I'11_ �.�_4111:, , -�\, ,,," �-- , � ""d - , , , ,�, , "�,frr.�,wqj,w "w ,-� - -�'-, " �� ,, -5, - -�,,,-,�,, - �, "- ,�`�Z�4,"�--�c""',,,'�,`,,,�,I' I , 2 I 1`1111� � , -w " , A', �,`-�, 'Ag ,g,,,'-��j, `N`,��I�lt .�,,,�),;� I ll'- "Ill-""I" , "I �!,C , -mvp -, , - , , , , , , �,,,,�""",,��,,��,�,-��,,��-,,:�;�""��,,,,, , 3 ',�'.)'W ',� 'J." "� � ';,"z, , "��--:,�,;�:,1�, Z,%cl',,'�,,,.',a�5,&-,I,, ��, m ��, I ,, ,o -0', �",��I", 11 �1000 �I". - ,� I , , ---,,�I�� I�,--�,- �, --- 11,1041 � �'- - ,',��i,� ,,;-, , ,� ,,V ,,',�,4"", Z;,� � ,I� , _ ", -, .........1 'I , !,%, 'N"l,', -,L' " I�� " �;�7�1,---""I 'I, , z,,,>,a...�*W �'%`�", " , , , , . i �Uls ,i, , , _ _ " "M _, �,,�,�,�, , , ,� � - - - \ I A � � Ill wi,"�'--' ,�' a I R \.g."t"'. , 1, 11 14,1�e �11 I �1111111 " 'I'' , / � , -- � , � - 'S 'I'll, ,,,, , , -g, R �` -�.,- , - 21 ,, ,0'11�I��,�,m A - � , , w " , -,,--, , I�--, 127 .�-;.�7 ME I ,--,,, � . �� "I yA�,,,I1L"�I�-�, , I �11,1. -W11 -�I,'�� ," "I'll, -- " ��, �111p z- , , 1 r. - � 1�,�, 1 , I,- , , , " - ,- -- , -,�� ��, � �- ',!,z,-,- I- I;�-',,'-��,,,,�-���,,,, ,,!.�- ,,� I -��,,` ','-,,,�a,,,","�,-� "', -� , ��"'' ` , '-,'-�', �,-,'�� �,- � ,-4>� '�,�',`,-W�,�,.,",-,, ,,,X-1 , "'-��---�,�",�,,- 111, ,�_�',�_�'--,�_�' ,I ,�............. � - �0, - . ,�, ,'I " I �, ---I"I" 1,-llm�� 111.11 11�---- -', � - I'll, ,111 ,, ,,,'R"" � , � � ��,. ,,,,,, , , , I �111 - N�- , � 1� 1,- , ,-�,,`,� �,1111 I, ,' , f'l�'l��fir-l.,T,��'-""",', - '-, , '- '�-�,,, ' '11 � ",,-- I'll 1,111, 'l-....... , " . , �,�"I . ,�',,'3�� �",',-',',,����',-,', '71 1 li'!Nlff�-Iiz pl,I", , '-�,- ,,'�-'-,,," -,�, �,,WRII � , , - ' ' ',�,, , --,�,,�$"- ,, ",,, - � , -,',',C�,,,�� , ,�', " � I , �-111 Zkl§e'�-�' P� . ��"4""�"k"" j! gy ww,� -,��...� -W,,-,1W ,-, ,,� ,,��,,, ,k , � ," - -",-�',�" , m -,'- -, �1111�111,�,1`611-,,, ,, " `� , &��,�, I ' ,,,-�,��:"t"�:""�,�,,��, �, m-1--' ,-- I'll, 1-I� -11111 - � - �'N, , - " I �?�� �, � -r, ,1� , �,. ip � " - 0,,,,�,'1��,� --, - ---- - a �,,,,,,, q �� �"',', ,3 m ,��,:-tiL�7� ��$�'�W;�',�'f;U �Ak �,,,N , 5�', "',-,,,c� ,"11 I 11�I., , - , 'i , ,S 11-111119 �, W'�,, , ,CM ,,,� � 17 ,'�""�- � � "V,�'",___--�',, �'.- -�--& , , I � , . , " e, ,�,� �g�,,�,', , ,410 " ,4',1&, " R -, ", 4-- -�",'-- , :,,--'--. ' . -�� -�,-��,�!r,,V,�; , , "" "� _,�,, 1��,��, ,��'�,,�.��","-�'llll� � , � , , -� ---- ��"-- " , . N,�,,,W�'� , � r"I".0,-,���"""��,,,,�:��,,,�,,-��-, � , " �� � I ,i ��, 1, I , az�, ,Et �-,�,",,kw , � ,, ��; - -, ", " I I , -I , I" ,",�," , ,- , v ,,.," I � I , - - �', � --, -.�'- "! I'll I,1 ,� -�" � , - - - 4, i,l - 1, , -11:1�1 ], �- , -, � a Z, -�, I , - I I - ` I,- , , - , , , 1'1��,, I�Iffl 'WEl", 'p,- ", " ; - , V - , V , , , , , 'PX`� - - � I - 1, , �,0 "',," ,,, , , " " �-'', 7� i,- ,� �- - " , " , ,, g , I , . , F, , v 0, _11,1 7 ,�', , i, - , --," , -, - , , - 11 - '11�- , � Q '12'�� 4 ," �', 11 I - - 11 , - , I , " , I � -", �, , , , �,- , aft , , � - ,M, �,,,,,��!,�,I � Y ,�,-', � " N i , , � v , " , " , � W i " "�, - ,� I ON, 'g-e --�,111 - I 1, , - � , 71 1110 1� , , , ', � �1, M�1'1 � W,w.�a, '' - - ii -. I��11 M,�,;?,m, � 4�O�,g 4 .?- I Z'114'1�', I'll wvg� �,& , * _!,�-,�- - ,� ,� - .-� '- ,-! � , , ',p 15, - ", � �� � , ,,, - � ,,� .- ;,,t`,!f ��,� � Yw � , ,,, -" I I I � ,- k , "," -" " ,�,,,-" I , - �% -U-� ,, , ", , , 1, �, , I�1� g� , �'- , 11"', , - � , , ,��, ,� , , , ih � , I r �- , ,,, , ,�,,, ,",,� ,,'X,���� , , , 7- 77, , , - ,", ', , , , , I , .-.,il "�, , ,77-1 ,i-�, � , - ,�, ,� � 1, I - " ,� 71 ,� ,,, �, : � I , , I 11 , -, 1, ," ,, , � .e;;,, u 't -,....... �11'� , e can ,,. , U � , , , 11477, -A - - -V , " '� " -, -'--"' - �"r---- - � 111-�-, " - 7 . % " � -1� 111SA51,11 , - x - - �21, "-, ��- "I I , , "No , - - -,'-,�-',,� 11" � I", 11 I-11 I'll,11 I� , �,�, 4 'Z;, �,,�",Z";, , ", -4 ��,,�- � ",, -�, �- , �g "- ", 1 ,-,,�;,4,� -I- I"M "M'S- ,,; ,,",'�,,",,,!��-,,�-�Z�,���,,,-, ��,I- ,� ,,,�,�� ,, ��,�"":-",��,�,,,�,��,'-'�',�",:', ,, ,I, "`"""",`,,,�� i� ,;,p-,� �- -V &,N 1 11, I 11 I I ,OR-- ,� , - -" ," �'!,�-�,, ,,,-�',�-, i, "", ",,,,,�,�', :-',�",! �""��"";, - ,� , ,.!�'� , � -1-7-," 1,,-,:� -,-, - � 'A'� V i � , - ,,,,, ��d� lql4luf , `,,.$ 4,,,, - "",, - - 'A - �m�,-,'����:: ,,,,,� ,,' ,-,,,�-, ,,,',,w-;, , -- , , ""W" W - ,,-,,11, "" 7',-', �, "MMM � " ;� :��,-, , � I -I � , �,'" , , , "" � , , ,,, -,, --,- - � W , - - , , � - - A�&'-',' ,, - ," - , -,,',, , 'M .K ... , g N � ," ,� "'N ;":. .....- ", ,,%�, I I SIA91 'Z,,',o�z --- � � ", �, "k , ,'�ioz" , ,�','� 4 �t,��-* � �,`- 11, , -, '� ,,,� :-��,-, , , W "W , ---, 1-1 �` ; " , , � , , , 'O", -,-,f,1-- , , , I ,", �,�,z� "INTel -,", ?-;IN ",',q�, i �," ��,,--, , W11 11 ttl - "' - I ',��I , " -��,,�, - , - ,,,�. P,�"-�,�--�M�1, W-N."I'- , ,, "" , --'41-, 'S,`v� - " - ";� "I.',', ��, , � �,W,Mq'�gw, - , ��,',,,��,w � -f� , ,�� , , " , , , , ,1�, - I I �- 0, 'N-,�*-'�AO'.-- �� -�5 rg, 11, "'', -� , - � "'�, , I ��-, � ,al I 2� 11� � - ': " I ,I ," , , - , - - "�,-��,�,,,, � I ," " , , �,Igg"M , , - , , Q K�a ,�,,�Zwi,'�-��,`%�` -", I �, " , , N ,� Ni�,�,��:,- � "', -,?l V�,'�',�,�N,� �� � , - -,�, " �1,11'-�-,�-,'-- , ,� , , M", , , " M, 11 I � , , �W � a �( , ,�A -�-" ,_,,,, ...I� I I"I'-', 101 't��,, k"�,,�,�i���'ll",�,:- , � ,�Z, , - -,? - '��-, -��,-,,,,, ,,, "' � �4 -gkzQ,�), � , -, , , , - , -� - "-", 7, 1110111 , , � - I �,�, ', ,��.,�,-,, ,��----,"�,;�:�i. ,M�, ",� 1�� -":- , , 11, , , i, � , , , - , � ,� , 1 , ,, � � `: , , , ` � - � -111 -�. ,,�,�,,-,��] - �os ,-, , . t I ", , I -,, M 'i , , ,Mii - 11 �, , A , , ,�, � m � 1, , _ - �`,,-,,1,00 ,�Im, �"��"12 ;W-Iaz,,k�, , - -" ,�T� rM - � e� , ��" --pl---� .L.',i�--.,`, 4,Z'A � 'e"r �,,� ,, 1�1--1-11- - I ,, J�,,"", ���, - , - I - ---,��- , , - ,,,,�R,o -,�- I � � -- -1-11-4�� , _ .- , '� 12,A1 -11 - - � �"..;L-' A " � , ��,���� 4 M,k, ,�f �z , I- I ,A�W I I , 1-� I � I 111���-., I I I I A -W- ,� 1?'��>,r:, ""? , , NP Y ,- --� -�-'� M� --- - 11-1 11- �� , ,� p, 11; �7.7, , .,. I I 11-;1.,*�-,�, I 11, ,� ��,T,,s,77,7� " --�"�,�' � '9--g-�%,, , 1�I,% "",- 1-4 1 W-�,�-,'Xl ", , 4,�-;, 11 ,- � �`�," ,-4,,,, , I 11"I , ,'4� 1, I -, -11 �* 1 �,,_ �'�,,`,'4,�, �jp%,,�,4"",'%' �?,,;, , ,- , ,`� 4 ,� ,,, ' � 11--,,, ,�,4'%��,', :�� �, ,I, ': ,77, ,1 7� _ " - ; 0,41 , �--,�k, ,-�,�" , - I- I M,11- , , "Q IN , ,- " W, 110 -0-,,� -, ,�,,-r�,�-P,- "R � , � A �- .-I �- , I 1, I , 1 I ,� -, I I I , 1,-�,,�, , ,,,,,� ",- 'W��R`�- �,�,,��,_',, � 1- I-- I vw�� ,,, - "."" ,�,"�H,,�,,",- �,-,--� , , . M � e,' -- , � �, � �, � I �-". , �,*',Q,, I "I'U11,ii��X � -1 `:`-`�":*��, � ?,�, -, ,-, , , - -;,�--, ', W-,"�",_", "'I, ,, .11 --, � v��Q ,',14_ �, , , , , I ",1- , , - ,��-�, ,,�Mt ,�%, -, ,��; , ,�,"�`"-_,,, -"��,�� -5,-, ,,' ,a'7� , ,, ,,;;Itl" " - -. ........zz, ,',-", ", �� M �Q , I , " �, , - R'P� �� -'��,-,� ""'I",- -,- - - .,g�,� , ,, ----'-)x, N, -�-3 M , . , , ,�,�,�'5f-PS ,": -R�,,� I ZIA IM",Fg' , � , I I", ,'��,� '4- , -k;126"1-1"1'1' ,�� , � I .",I , -,- ,� , " - ", W,"�%,,,�,,�':�I � OR"I'l?':-,N-W, 1,T e R,� �"'M-Sp '�-,,� , 15-M ,��'r," z --�-,ft � 1,'1-I 1 � - --�: "" , 's , ,,, " ", � , , , �� -" . , i I ,,�-,, "" � .:- 1-19 ,� 'I'll t-� -�,,�,-Wl,3 " , ,� - , 1�I , ',��, �' '.... , -�,r A"E ", ,, , ,1111 I 1;� , , ,`,�,, , ,-:,� , - A- ,,4. 7 ,, � ,, I ", - , , I ,M&� N'S"I'- :,� - - � , , � W-111 .- � � I I '1111"', - � � � , I . ,5,�11 ""',...... I ���� -;Mw"a � 4 41 ,- �v , , ,,,- , " - I A%�5 - I I '�,' `',- � �,-�7' , ,�i-, - -� !,- ",""'11 ,-, - :" " ,"�m --�- �, I ,�,-- �--`,�',,�,,," ',", v �, 'w�, - , M" ,�, - - , I ,- 11�. �",--,;,-'&� ,��%'.",,�,����,-,,�,4�,,,�','I�:,-",��:�4�i,,,,',-���,�', :-', ,'�,�,�,',!,,,'�,",��,,,�,,� ' ' , " , I I h'q,�N,,- " , � -- ---�, -, " �,�'::,1,I,, I -� , J �k"',, " 'T�5� !A - � �, I ., "I . " , ,, �� I, " I -Z- " , I �� �, ",,,,""""";��"� � .',�,',",��' ,'��, � �� ,_,-,�,- , ,-1_141e�,��- I ",3,"', ,�,,�, ,w,�%',,'�,MIIAOI' - F.'N"'O , � ,�, a ii� -,�',,,, ,,,'��, -- 11 I , "'� � , , ,�-�,�,, , , 15�', � �e Al"",�,"",,�,-- ,,, ,,,,, .,� - -- 11 �� ", , - 1111-; 11 , I V, 1 11 I ", " -1 ,, I """ It �,, g=,, &,-I , , ,A" � ,G�-� �"- 117 �- , � �, ,"<-'j, �t', _-'� ,, , �,,,,'-'v.... ...R"", , ,AFN - 12 - � - " C�Z'g ",>" '--- -'Z' , , , � - . ' ,i " , , ,F-, I I �I I,� 1 ffi-`tmi,�,,-s,',��', � I " , b - -- -�� , ,, ,, :� , " -1- 1-^q �, ' , , - `'-7' ,2H,,, �n'4�g,e -, ,,, '�-,�,�- .- ,a ,j�,�, 1, -it 4 m,t��- ,, , �',,-,z�- ,�g,m YW n �,,Z, ,��,-, " " � - �"O", �, " -,,!, ,>,, �- ��,,e,re ,; 02,,�,t,'-, , - �,.N� �,wmi- ,j , , 0�j " , -- ,:" , " �,�,,, �. , , -,-�, , - '�2"�,,-� -,���,?,,V,,, , , -- , ,-� , " -p " -%,��' , , , ,, � - �- - . , , 1�,`,��, �i ,, ,F,�,,P_ - ,1� � �,`�,- & -,,��,,,,,,�` ,�,,'"'-� - 4�24 I� � F a� � z,,��, e,,�",,-. � i�Ig t - th ��Ial% , Am- 1 - �' 1 A ,,, ��- �'�-, -�, '", � 4'e-��-, ,,� I -,I <,:�,�', �� 'O ��i!w � 'r A - , , , - ,q,11 ,< ,, �,p'�,M "47k- � ,- -11", " "C --, ". - ," , , , , , , -, -, � , , 1��, 11 ", , -� ,I `��,�,,F -1�,�'ll,���"I"-"��', �," �, -� ;�� -'- 'NM,-- , - -- , ,�, - ,�,,� �, �-� " ,�"-", , ", , m , - , - " �, � � "M - �, - , � ,� � I �- " , I - , , , -, 1" - , g - � ,ft � - �, " , ,��ffi , -,-- , I 'm , , - - , , 11 " �A - - 11 ,- , yp , " , �... I , , " . , , 11 n " , , - i , 11 , Q ". -- , "! , ,Kp'�'�`,',' ��: �%j1"-,,p,,-1�'-,1 -,�-�,.,,,�,,-, � , 1,11,11 - , I I--�� 4 , '5 -` - -I � , ----, , , 1-� , --� , , v� .� " A , , - - � � �,^ 1�k, � P, I I , , MUV '1111'�1111-11 - - ill "I ;1111,1---', 11 111,1111 " . " I 1�% - " I �I I 11� 'b"", I I �X � , - , I - 1, 4""' ,lm�I I e`�`;,P",26,M,*"Y 71S , 1� 11 " ,N . t'. - � -��...... ,,",,�", 1" � , - e - , -110 I "I,:, -1, "I', -, , 1011-i,IN -� - -- ,�'1'111 , ,."M,'-'�,'�� I 1, ,,-,,,!,,,9,11"'1Z , ,� , 11 IS � -, "'! "" I '�'N'1'1'1��",��,:, -� P, wo",, I� - - - , 1� RT Zm "Mm" " " A - -Z§,kM � I - , 11 OR�, ., ,,, - , 1, '111 I�- I I I 'll" , �-o %w r - I-S-,YPL, """'g ,, ,im "", i� " t,�� ��,f-,' ""`�:�j f� ,"�W,-��� ; �, �"� � r' ' ,' "' ,K ,A� W", �, M � , �- 111 �11 "-11 ; 11 , 1, �� - -�� ,�, �,� � - ;, 1111`� "� ",, � , I "It, � ' , I ,, ," ' � " U1'� � ' ' , I -- , , � ,, < "-""��s-- " �I ,� � g, I -,� ,, ' �'� �',� P� � 11 7 fm, 1", 11-' I I � , 11 i'U '(' '- " ,� 1� , � " A , I'-` �oI U11 ,�- t 'e,� af',li, i ,;`�, -,�, " �, -, , �1,, _ .�" h 'e" a "' h iz, 11 ",,� , . ,"L ��,, "' �- _� I ,,,,, - , ,, ,���,�� . �,�M, '�'�--,%e�-,�,- " " ;ew"'A � "a",ne, �,,�,�', d,- - !", u ,�"w -,,�, t d� ,,I��,� A 0-,t � M ,, ��- , ��� ` �`'16� , " 13 � , ��,� , , ,�-` �7,','�'Ij! �111�', N`��,,`k,,,�.� ,�'Z 1,11!F, ,�.,��711- '5g '-M,"�', ,, --"" - _ ,--�� _,,��,,, , , �, ,� ��,',111,'�,, � , ��,",V...��,,�, $ ,,�, I , �` "',R C,'N-, 14� � �� I , �� 11 ,G I 3 , �,"1�, , , "", ,,�," - I", - - W ''!,�, - , ,t R I , "j"' ......N,- ,il-'� ,�,,, , """',�' , ,wa -�:�--�- , , , 4 , ---- " � "� "-- �, A, - I , ". ,, I Im , 1�11�n',�b�,�1,0,',��, - go,�, - � � I I �� � ,,� , �",��111 - --r-�;,we, U �"-�,�, , , " - � - , - �k�5, .'�, �', I - � ,1, a ,<!,H ,xNs":4 �, ,'�,, 1 �-Im ', z 1 O I- 11-,,�,., b ,MI I1 -,�, -.... , ' "I t- �r ,* , ; , � 1%Il �-�111 , ,,��Z ,,�- :, I-�'-, ,", -, -," . ,,-" Y :,, "- w ,� ,��X�K' II -.1� .11 ��"11 ,,,,,�, 1,11, -,d, , -` RX, - �,'�,,, ,� � , ,1�,-"',,I,��jl�,,-1�1, ' ,� ' -. ,�,,,_-1 I 11" 1 N� , 'O , ,�', ,, - � "'P",% " , x I � " 7 11� , �, � , , -�I . 1 I , , -,-:, ,", , , � "�k ��, -�- - ,,W� 'M,�,��_U,,,,�-, ", '-, , , � " � " "- , I -� , 9 �z '1�I"�I I I I",- -� , ' - , ` , ,, I I �"I�� , � IN I-R--Nb,,w,, ,, E ,,,,-,-,,��- -� ,, 7, I �,;,,,v n, ..,.,,e.. ,"i 1A, ,,�, yf,g �"'V"w% , n - - " I -t t- I , !,�, , ,,�� I - �: -,, , m , m�, -�- � o, I , ,.� ,?;! o� i � � - ,, , ,,-, u � " ,, , � ; �� �,.),t ��,�( ,,� �,,be 1611, c i �,, � ",,-,�;,,�II , I , - - � - '- , � - , , w, , , �,,- ,,,, , -�,--' �,,,--0 .A1��I 11', , s-F W , '11P'� � ,�e� -g,, " , "I� , 'I, 1 "` , I3", - , - I--" I . R-0 5t,ft" � ",....... - - " , W-2 , � - -',�� ,r- , I I � " I 11�yll,- Id - 11, - , , I I I'll 11 , I , -,"'I'll, , 1, . - , 4 , - , ,I , , I . ill 11 " ,Z, I ,W, ,� I " m " I" '--, 4 , -, - - I � , ,,� �AO,-��, I I �, gl, ,-- , , ,--",-- �,-,, -�-, -, --' I , I I I , ,� I , - - , " ,,M� ,"", � , "', �', -V�;�,-',- - " -I � I 1, �, - K- - N I 11- , I 1 �14 - - 11 , W, , -, , I 1� " '-�o --, -� , I , - I 11" �, ,,, , " " Z" �- "" , -;� , , , ," � , I ,, _ -- , �� , ... � , , � I � , , ', , ,,!, 11� � �� '�,,'� , , - , , " `Glel',� "", , , , � ; ?;,"��i"� - � 11 ,�-, , � - , I , � , " -- , , ;111 -'�,,z � , , I 1A �, , I - , , I -K , - 7, , ,,: ,��, I -1- �A�&p - , - 1 -1 1-1-11, " 111", I I 11 1111-11�� " I�:�L 'A 1�-1 ,, , '-��,4k � t�gg'-,-', _','_--- ' , ,, �...-,',.'p' I I�N�l ,,1�,�&? '1*1 � , , - 1 , I 0,7,--�4`- ---gM ',12�1,�, �- �,,,,,- I I , 1'41-� -X.- I , "�, ,-'C�'--,,� �',I 11 '11,17, -,� c-��71......,7.,�, v 11-- � "I , �;- - �, .'- , �n , V I "-M, ,'IMN��',1 �, �- -�- , , - p """, � �� ,k-,�- - ' ' ��,,,-:�A�� �': � - ,,, � �, -,..a,:,.;.., -,,,,- ,,,,, � !'�,,,- --l" ,��'-,- '�,�-�- ,,`� ,,-� -,- ,z"W,'i,-'--, , 4 , , "1,�`�; , ,,I1�111, -� -,,--� " ,� , 1- "MA,"k - - � ,� - ��w w 1- , -- 11, I �42,,�,,�,z I - - �,,�,,,V,-, �- -,� , , -, � , '--m 4�,��-' ,-', "�'e,�""'Wllz,'-'�;, ; - I ,SA 11�,,R'�"', -,,���'- , , ,-�� Sg--�T'mo,`-- ", 1, ", -�, " , -,� r - , , , , "" , `11 .1 � - 4 �n . -, "", I ,:, �, �- - - , ,�:�"' , �, -,� �' �,� - ' -"c- :� ','-- " ,��." � � I ,�, � ': '", � -�-','Agl,--, i"", �,�-,-�,',, '���,,,, C"I'l ',,�'�'t-- -,��', � ,,, , , I I , . . .� .� " , , 11 , ,h -� , ,I , ,`A.�, - -"- -1 ,�,'p , - , I -"��i-,-- -N -,,4c �: ,�', ,- � , ,,� I 1�,,� �,, , , I ,- , - 11 � g, , I �- , ,,,"�,z , , , w m , , � '1 - I � I � -, �- � , � , 1 41", �,,;v�� � -11 I ,,,,,,,,,, , . I ,, X:4 I , - 4,11" , " -11 `� �11 , I I - I -m-fir„ "I ... , . i- . , U, �f""�"I 1,�; " --"-)-- ?�- ��-'--- , � !'- -, " 11 , I 111h,", -11 , ", I ,��,: A'�,, - I ,�,,��,',��,, , 1111�2 I , - `ffi��'R,-;:,, � I 11 1� ,,�,,,,- ,�4- 4 - ,',f, �� - ,-,�-.,, , - � ��' "�"g- , ,- 1- a .''. 11 1 zR4 -�,7-,,-,", 4 , 4 �"- �,�, "" , "M - , ""�,"-, - t - " f,'" , , -- , , , '�--,-,- � ,>--,�: , '-�-,-c --,1,,, ,�14;,���,,,�, � '4 ��,,���',,,� " `,,�,,��-,�,,,,,��, ��':-,�'v'ffl,:�-�,J,`�"�'W' * ,, �� I �- 11 �,� � - I -',,� �I ,,� � �1, "; ," , ,-, �4, " - , 'k , - , 1 1 ,,R , , '!� , , �11-11 I- '-, � ; I'll , ", - - - � " ,k I --ftl,,V" - ,� TA �� � , t"", �7 ;�,,ggj,_ , � , m , W - , , ,, - w r- , - , � � � , -T,, , .", , - � , , I I ,� Q, , , -A-N$�,, -7v 11 :1, .!� , � � 11 ,' '.M "i",,-,��'� ,'-,�-- I I I � ,",��,", ,,, �,� � �,% - I'll, ,,�, I - , ,',, , - , ",- 4p , m"", ...... , - ��,�r� , � -"��""3�,��,�,,� ,�'�'�,,�,��,�,,, . 0-,�3�, ,,,--", " ,F*;, , X'Amle i I '� '�.a�,',� , AMIZ�,-�,,,?jl'�,,, ,,,� -- , , �-W, - ,,�,,- , , , -�,-�,114'-�'" M - .-- , I , ,�,-" -"-�&,'- �. , � "� '��-' ,,- I �,, �� ,Q;1-11",-,�:,�, - 11,11 1 !-�`�1i�--'-,Z'�, "&"� 'I'll 'Aft, "? , - , � , -, "I" " , -- � "" , k-11 -11111-1 R , 11 ��-��-j, ,"P,W,R` ,�� , , , ""',�S 11 . -v,i--o, -"."", ,.- - Y�-,� , , v � > , -- 11-��--�� ." -A." llfw@�,","� - " , - , -�- 1�'I, !i, , . e ""- , -,',�,15wv,. � - -", 'my- 11 1-111 1 �-- '' , H -,", 1 5M" �,�-:,-� ��', - " ", � , , -BN,n,� '-�, -� � � � , , 1, "" & , �i , I ,� I M " �' %,""" , �11 1:, , � -��......., -",,�, , .1 K �-"--"-,,` ��,� , 14,"'� I , , ,z, ,, -, ,,il,-�,;"', -,�,L�:,,`,i'� , , , I I 1, g �'�, I I , , , �-, " "g, �gg ,11 I g & `,, , , ,,- ,;, -,11 mr,"W" �� " ,�,�-A,��`,�',', ,, "" 111 , �, --,, - ,,,%,�� � , I . � -�- , , , ,�q 9, , , ' 11 --��,�-', � �?;,�-",` , 1� ,I ,� - , ",� , , i , - ", I �"I N *I I _� !u4l,�,, i 777- ,1111,111N, -. � P - , , - I , " r ...... - "--, , ":,I "', " -- ��, -�, -- , - , . "I'll , " , 1 , � � , � , , /,;"r�ll- � �", 1, , ,';,, , � , - 'N ,,,,-,,v, g '-,�-_ - ,�",�-��.,�,'� ,,,�-�j� - , . , � 11,11 I'll , 11 , � .� � 0 �� � , � -�;`��",;,�," , 'i - , " , , -r,11 , , I ,- I,h ,111'1��111�11�', , , " , §,�Iill, * "-; � - An, �`,-,, ,,,u" ire. a- �4,�"O;-, ' ---11 � -A��, _'� , " "Z ! , , , ,��M�,, , I'- , "", r � ,�,-i-,��"""4"'�' I'�� � - � " , ,M,� ", A, R, I 11 --," , , ,-,�� 1� 111) �' ':/W X"5","� _ ,,xj�,�f�,',-� R "'� ,�-,,,'�,�,, , w �� ' - � 1111, M , '--', , , -- -V -- � I . m m " , � N M -, , , " , -11',� A - i-- "I ,� i'� W , �, I 1 , �- I'M � I , I , "" � - , �Z , - -, � , � - , - i " 5,,iEIME`.-M,�,'%',,r-,- ,,, - 11 I ',,��-%�,� �,,�, -'1- , , " I ,,, , �,-K�,-�,---,� , - ; , ,�, �,� �1% - 45 En �=%,""", -11 I ,-, � � - - " 11 " ,-, - , - , � " - , " , - ,� P - , - " e re-q ,-�-,� ,@ ,� a ,-�� " ,,n ,�� ,, - - t -,-l�;,,"�,�" ,!:",,�� -�-i , , , a ,u � -�--��,,fbt��,-` " I , 1,�,- " X, -�� U-1 , 4 � 'J'117 ----�,L,_�111'1 ', k ,, K i q "�� ,�-v ,!7-,:� 1'��, j"t '. � 0��, ,�, z , - I . 1� , , , i I -s � -�, -7 �, ,,f ivzu, unig,, ," I �- - 11 - 7w -7-"',, -�- -,,��,�--,, I ,'A�I" , ,- , a,', "', """e c - m,,, ,,,, ,,o4 k,�" �,�! � � - 6 , , =- -� , , , , -� 'k !�-ri-' ,, 4, , , " - �,- rK" ,,, - "! , , , , , � ,�,, �,- I�1-7,".W,, - I '-� , � 1- " , � � - -,'�'A�V,s-, ��P_ � � I I I I -- I I I. m ,,Z' � � -,,,-N, 'Y" � '",�"`a'. �� " " -1 � ,�4 "I'll, � ,� ,2'1�111N 41M g -% W77�, , 1, "g, K", "', , "' - , � RIWIP ,_,�)%, ,,- _ � � � I I , , � - � �,�, " , ,� � " ,, '!� .,�,,, �� ��-,'��,,, �,'�,�, , , -15r, --, "�,,,'�r,l , ", Ai, , ,M,',,R"Mq,,� F 111M, " ,-"�' I I I 1-111 � ,� , - --m m "" ,�� �- , , ,"I , , ", _ A,-, I - - I - , I -�' ,, , , - / 'r R � I'll - ",� ,,:, - , , I - - , �'EX, ,,"�,-,,'-,,'� "'' ,",� �,Ao;""--, - , , ,� � , ', 11", ,k ,,'W, -�, ,�,'�- 1�"'M`, - �,,,,, " -I , -,- �--'� ,,, � ,%,�-,,,,�,� - ,,, '-�, , I -��,IR, ,�-�, ,/S ,�� ,�,,,,, , ,�Mkv& ,�,,,,, - ,7, "k,-; , -��, ,-"",- , , " ' �,',`,,-,�,v ,M "All"PR11", � 1 , ' ': ", , ',>-1�� - , APPI"."A121 ,,�, , I , ", ils" � ,42.1-11 , - -�', y, , - - km,�,�:,� 0�1- , ,,� .- I -��, -- _,,,, .1 , A,AM 11 - " M , '� �1 ," , , � i I-- , - " ,-, , ' ',�,,"� ,,�-, 11,11s, 15P RIP �?lffl `�',� I " s less" 11 I- -, . - , , - � -�,,N�k - , " " / , K -�, ,`-,�?,'�"",�, Ift,p - , W _', I ,* - , - �,., � ,,, - M � 1�11 1-1�^,, , 2� 11.1 1 -1 , , , , , "' , 'a". I : 1,11 ,,, " - , , - I -- - 11 - � ,,, , , On ,-,g, e ��Ak� , -- , , "s " , � `M,'S,,,��,Z '', , , "I �,� I I -��,,: �U,,,, -, ,,-,�, �� ,,,'Ag " 'Y""? 1 OT ,-",, ,-,, 'iO" " w , � I,- m - T11 'o- �,,,,l , � ,V,,! , -,�, � , "I , , - , ! �,� �,��,,, , , 11-4- � I - - '* ,,��- -V,W,,A,;,Z":�-�,,�� _ � ,`,,' -m I � - �,',',"', , I , ,,` ' t',�", ,�:, ,,%� 01, ," .-�', ,Vl-t "Ik - , - - , ", ,,, � - �,�, 41""""', ; , , , - 11� I 'AM I , , �,,, , ,� - � , - , - - - , � ". -11 `11�,*, I , � IR -g, ,W% RM o " I I ,; ----- I I -0�1��- � -,/'4RE �k,,NM'N N -,$- I'll MA.." , , I / I I � �,',/ , M- -X 1, , - , I, , _- , -�', �,',, ""',""; -,,, -,",", , ,, " .� t , , , �,,11,11r I .1 -" `-d� � �� �'-- , ', -L, , �, -,--p-, - 11C, q6V`-- `P?�'- , � , 1-111 1:11 _,� I.-A � . -'' ,:" 1,g - , - - �? � , 'P�,, / 1,� W, �--� , "'I'l- 1 "g ,=-� , ,1-1 ,-'�A, � . . .�'-F�:,-�,',', "N.- -11,w I , I , �, " 'M g-A , I , X�I,y - �- , ,� , I , I " I- , ,, ,�,�11. -" �,�-��,�J�-,t",�,z�,,,��,!��j�,,�""�,,,,,,,,,,,,," ,iR`11 1� ", 1- 1�1 ,; " �� ,-,, , - , � ""'A" �, ,�,". , "'i , `� �4� M , ��Php"�'�,�,� " :'z�,�1�1�" ,_�,�" " , '- ,-�V,C - 1. 11 '� , "I",<1 -2z.�; - - 'fl. _ 11� . I � ,�,%, " �;� ," "/w� ,, 1�'11'1 ,, �� PH - p�!�""t � voilln', �-�, 'PT ,�, ��_ ,,,',`,���,7,-Y'- , I - " ,�_ I 1 , , ',',x , , , �, , ': gg� ""i'MI, ,- ,�Mx X '� �-, "'-,, � - I 4,�k ,i","� - ,, ��',�,,,�,,� , ", ,,,11--- , ,� � I", � , " �, N , *,�, I ,, 111-Z-111-', ,,,�,- �,�m I �,,,-,"�,m o'd - I I�11) - I ,"1, , """',": I-',�',',',�i ]� , , � . 1� ,� '111,',,�� " -'Z.,�A;,-',',, ,�,�,,I ",-- ." , 0�11111- , I I ,�A, ,,�,- , - I I , 4��M�,�,,,,�,-- �,� - 1 ,- 6"", -M'A�,R,-�,",�N'�-�,, - .1, , --- 11 - "�, �n , - , , ,��,,,, - - � , '" ,, , ,",',�! !, "' "! , -� �i- ��,.,, 1-'-�11,I 1,I", --- , I ,� ,,,,,,i,� ,�',, , "A", , , �: � I I ,,'4 f1,P,,�",,/v-"`i ,,,,��,.,A'�,h;'��,�l;,�,!�,,,�!�,,:� I I,I I I �?,Al, `,' 1��' � I ,-,, ,,,, � , �, , ,� I , i"", ,� , , , , - -111,11 1�11 ' - ,-�,- � A , . N,�,�.�f, I - �, , -1 �' '�--@K�1It' , � �1`1, �,"Y I-,,-,� ,� - ," , , �, ,zz q,��-`�-,;"- , :- -., "*,'� � � Y -M""M - ", ,T,-jmz;r ,',� 11 M," , I :", � `/,,-,k,,,�,Q, � -i , E , . �", ,&,',",n", � I I - - ,"", I 0�� -�-�,�,, 'M ,�- i� 1 �% "'�� �" - � " �', ,� "I �I 11- 1-i I i -: �,1�I� � - '��',,,,Z,,, " � " ��M�Ilwl�", �, M �� ,- -,"-4, v 'v� ':" ,�-,- ;� , � , � �k - ", � , I w 1,1�, , -, I I gA,�� - i , N R , , 1,T111- � I . ,�,,�--? I --� ",",",�, , - �,,, , , , , " - "Mu I C 1MFRFC1�'-11'1 kl]T-`1�111 , ,� I - �, , �, ,�,� ,� ��;�J, � "', , - ,��, �-11'91 :U,�, q,," , - -,- ,;Z - ,-,*"`,V� , , I I - ,, ,-�-�--R, .,, - - , -<V,�m'R(, , - 'IV "1, mro, , o� '>�, ", ,��":� - ,,,t N", �P�:� � � , , g , /, I :��V�l -,,,I, -",',,, 'j,� � , &, �,��SA�,'A;,��W,' , - ,,,I ,I--,11 I-S"M M,,�,""�,,�`� , -,,, ,�, � � ,� , ,,� - -, -�� - �, , ,�1, , , 11 1�111"I I 1 114S,�, 1 1 1 ,� ,50,4,,z-a 11" '111111&�,,��.-,,J��"�-_, , �',", �,<,;��,!� . I I I" , ,,. , --""- Sr , " I , ", - - I I , , -"'� ,�6,"h; ,"d, I -,V` Igv,,�Z W - �': "�,��,P�--4�` ,,z-, --- 4,- ,_', I- ��- - - 11 � 1. , , '', - I , ,*-,,� " , - , , - - -1 MWT-:�-�IS� m ,,6N, ,"� � �'1`11�'*'��-?"',�,,Z�-- - � <�' ,�`�W=--��- '. " -,�Y�, ", e " 1-11 - �- ,t� % I 11�,-1 I ,"I.-I - I- -,� ,�., �-�', ., &q. v - -,',�,W, , � ...... , - ��7t ,, , - � "I I I 11�k�11�,N'�11 I., -1 , '- - � " I-1--�� 1 5�-- I , , vz, 1112 -1, �1�� �;-,-'�,, , , 4� K1, ,- ��-"'-,- I 111%,"," ,,, , I � -�,- , , r, - , , , , , ��,J1 - r R,� � , I ,, , I - 11111 " I , - - a -��',- I I , d,1�4, , , " M, I 11, � 11 z",1.I ,1� , -,,N,',,--- -, ,g� �-;V, �'�� � , `�,' ��;',," " - ,�k,"-�� - , �� v , ,-,, ,��,4 - , , - o� '��-" ' ''A"ffi" rz!'Ve3i-74�w "Ri"NO, I "�1� %,, -1, 011111111 1 1�0,:" , '�,� , , ,- � ,,",`%", � ", ",'' �4 , '", .��, _ 'k , - 011", " �101`11-,�;--- , , , " " �11� , -,�','�,�,_, ,�,,,�11,R , " f, K ti-4 � " - � I��,1, , M -- - ,11'1� , I & , - , , , "� I ,,'�,� '� -,,�? �' �Jft' .1 �, ,W, , ,4,��,�,',�-,`,....... , ,,�� A-V, -�W�,ak,�"T������:"��,i,',,,� ,'���,--��,,`,�,`," "R,- 16A,6`14 ill� ,"4 1 1 � I'11� ,�', ,,,,,, �.p' - � , �,,z � I'll - , �,�,M ,Q,�§,K*U,,��_ ., ,,, ,�, I 11. 11'1`��-11,-,,��', �-I 1�"� ,, �--W"'-M`111- �� -,, ,4"'Z'A,,:,i�,- A- " 111'�'�11111'1- I 1- ,�,,,�-,,`�,�,�.... ..... , � I � I V, , , - I - � , , ", �, -, , r �,�1�1--- ," , 'T, � , � - � , , 'S- �,,""I 1� "i,"". . , , I'll ," , , t�-, ,, -,��, � "'r," - , ,'J, " - �'g�."" , ,�, ,'," -ft, � , ,�, , I ,� � I , � `�' �: - , ,"�- , , , " ...A'k :",,,,� ,,�,,�-��,,�,�,i� I I ,w ." ""', "', -. '' .P ` - " � � '�N':, �, ',�- I ', ,f,�'F -,'-,_-,,_-,,,-, , , --- "", . , 1-1, ,"�Jxn�l,IV-, ,,-� ----I- " ,"I'll""'',I, � ,;a��',Z"-"14?"��,�-, - ,",�,,� � �N , I 11 I I I , 11 11-11 � - � 1, � k-, " , x"'. I '11"',111 11, --- -e, , I�11;-- ,;, -, "' , -,- - ",�,�gj����','%,Q,,�I I I I I I 11 11 11. I'll , I"?-�,"11-�-,-a 'i ,�,/, ,*W- I`1� -,/, -4,---- -- --�,,,,,I'v�,�,,�-%,,,�I ,- - �,� , ,,, , � , ---I - -IN �,- �,-�-,,�,,�%t,'4 � "; - :� , � 1 V,�,� "' -,",��-",* c"t ", " �- " , , " �,� - :�,�. I C , - I � 1,10 , 11' '� , - , � , -40, - - ", , �f ,�,,',---'- ,,'-- ,,,-,, " ,-,L,,,,,,,�`,/, ,--, , , , _ , - ,, -`-, ,W,�Q- ��'!,,., " , MR, , -w, � - �,',4,-�:, ,�,�, _.-,- ,", ,""',,"g�',-N-� �'," , nw, , M, �,,,�,,�;,��,T�,�,�-� -"' " - 1���,---I--111`�,- I � .11W I 11 1,g"4,,v g Q vg -,= - -,- ,- �, �,�','-�,',,�,--��-�_ , -," ,"X%0,11,1131"I' 3 ,",-0, ',�,,,,,'j,,Q,,,"�'- _ ,� "T-4,;,�-"\,�, , 1,- -,,"-��?,-,",, F M - ,& �J.W'g,'��Qj PN, '�,A""Vg"t , , ,!%Et,,,`-�"-;�, ,`-,Ii ,� _6 �J�g,�,'�� �-- 1,11,,,,, I -�,-,,,, �"--�""'\R ,,-, ,I ,,,,, M_� -- ,�,",�;, " ,11 I Km� , 4�, � ,,, ,. W ,"-,�`�11,", , � ��, , tlll�'-'-', `,"a�i , �, � , J��Z�; ,�tg"W��-,,� n " -, -1" , " ,, ,- - � ,� I � '� 11-1 �- "I 9", k � "N I I- f- - ,q ,,,,,,,,'-',-, - I " 1-11� 1%Y��'�,!,-- , ,-,-"" �, I I �m:7i ,,- �' "' "' - �,, I ! - P12,Im �, cl, - -'r , � � ,"IN,"-4 M � ,� �� , � _- ��,_,,_,,_,,,,-,,,,-,,,,,,-,,,,,,-,,,� ,� ,� ,� "� ,� ,� , , , , � `1- � ,, � I � � ----,11 - I n-7i----- , , A' V � �,, �,--,,,, w � ... - - I I-- 1" -1 " - �I 11 I I Z- 1 "I - - -7-111,11, -1 11 I 11 - � --, I - -,:�,, � 1-1*1 , , 1� 11 I'll, -11 1- I I - , I �� 1�1 I .� � - �- I I - , I I ,, """ , � I , , - 11 , I ,,,,, , � �, -- 11 I I- - �v"',"i " so -,- " � ,�� , I'll � -", - �i ,m , , , I I'll , .I 1-1 �-- � I ,,,, ,", "' - MIM ".151", P','-'' ,q �, � � I "D 11.1 �,,, 'O I �'11111'1,111 X", "",,IM ,�'11111l�, e"'Im , �11 � , �111'1 IN ",I"',, ems` � I � )i�l�,�� � ,1 k"4" �� ., ,- I � c�-,,�;��_zss:,, , � _ ,,� , �I I�"I "I ". , I'll,I-,I � , 11, % I -, '� ", �'. I 121� I " - I , " " , , "I "", 'I"d, , ,� ll� , !�u -,-, , "M,,--�!-, I �11, �"I'll I l""", " ,&',",'�,"',"��;,,�,-1,', 5,�,,,,, -, - --,,-,,� , ""I'll , - ,,,-, - � ,',-,�,," W', - �`,-I I � ,,,,,�,,,-,-:�, ", " ,� , 11 - "" -11, !�� �"""': ' "j�,'�" """,�," �,�,'��"'�,�',',',�",' , -1111t, ,111 m ` " I I I Ol % , ,, " � ': i �"�,,"'-',' I 11 I Il � , � , :�,, I ;��, ,l, 1� 1:,IZI-, " ,1, � � � I , ,z " §k,," ` " ,,�":,,,.',�-�,--, I ,I � � ,, , , �,,,�,,,, , ,?x , , � , � , , , I �, 111,4l"I'll I - ,:- ` , "�, ,; , - , - A UT, ,, M � , - I'll ,cj l,�,l,'F, -" ? �',,,,.', ,.- -,", ,-��`l ,'N, � -IN 4 ; �l,� ---�,,, S ,<`,�,,`�", R ,- �,,,",�l,�V,� ". ,,%,�, � � � , ,il, , ��, - l�,,,"A , , 1,"- l"111-1 �,. �11 "I" "I, W.11 ,W gi , ,,,, - , ,le "% ll;,A ""ll , ? 11) - l�$,A - l��,-, """'V ,, "��,', :1,,,��,4", �',-p --�, 'IgA. ......-"�� ,"--11� I ,III � ,,��,�-,,,- , -�,.,' '�tllll "" I "m, - I Q _j," , ,, I �j ,� , , -,'�� , �,- a��� , , t" , , - "" -1 � �, ,,��,,,,`k ,�&'�',,��,N"i"'ll,, ',,- ,l , - 'l , "'� I , I,-,' "K 11� , Rl I 't k,111,�� I "� " 111.,�y Z, , , - q " ,�'4�",,��,',- ,4,�Tl)�'k �dolR,�,, ��, , ,(, � , ' " � ,I I I 'SK% I , , , �, � 'k 11,1"I I ,,"v 4� � - I ,.- l"M X, I I" ,v- �'�' -,,, �,�,-, ,,,-�, ,,I -, ""- -'J,�j 1 111,111, '� ,�4 -"ll" ",- , ", ,-, ,Iq 01"'I", 11`1� , 'e: I ,,,� - , , �6,i�, , -, k, `, ��"� 11� � � ,--", Q,,�, ,�� " �,,i';��,','�,� , m "I" A If,"-1111-,I , , ,* ,- , " , , I I " �, , P gg",," , I ,", I�1'1'-, -1�'- -" I , � 4 'I'll g lK e-le"Sm 11�I � A -"Jllgk,,� ", ',,�;"�-� - ,�� O� , �Alll " I 11 I � 11 , , I ,, ,M�l -;IIII 'v- , ,-1, --- ,", , � 11 I Q ,,,, 11, I I l� I I I "fin.: I I nz , , , I - , , ,�zj,��, r I I Z, I - I�I-,",,,," I'M ,�,K`-',�",Z� "l-,-,"'0�1�,- ,� ,'l ��,k� , UMP1,11, I'll", . "I ,, �'n,,, - , , � m , -'l-4t, -I "I',S--,,, � lM," p � ,, �, - W�,,'-"l,���,I'll d � 11"W'k, - -11 -, � ,,, -, - -- V" , " �N , ,-,!'s,,��IAMIF !�-I l" ,� I ". -"-,� Q- -, � ."I'll" 11 ," '- , - � ', ,� 11�&,,, " - " �, " , " ,�'- � "" � 1164,I'lii , ,�x-��, , � , , "I"N' 4-,,It ,"-'�','� �,,"--�,-, �!'�-- " I,;�' ,,*S � ,I , ,, ,,,,, ,l.k ",-, `�,r ...0, ,,x � - , g, ,� , -I ,�'�111 1 1'4,,�-�" " �", �l�,,� ,�,.� �� " , ,, , , , " � " - , ,, " , ', , "",%: "l','�,-*�- � � I 11 - 'k - , .� , I ,m, - , , , , �, , ,� ,- ,, , , I ,�,j",,'��, ,, "-* ,� �, , , � - - ,,, 'l", -,,,i�ij% , ,_- I I I ock, "I Q , I � " , - " 11 -, -" , - , , ,-��l,"",-.',� � ,_ , � � -- - -�,,A,, " ,�� ��" , I - I V"'19 , U& ,�• In";��, '': � " , ,,, �,, I " I, "I, YL , �,,� -a--k - � ,Z,," ,,-,,-,',I ,',-�- �I , I �,,�,'I A:,�'; ,, ,�, 'I, ,,-I Il M "r '-'k��- -�'" ,-1,I- I - l, �w,"NUE,",, �,,,: , -, �k ,��,�,, , " I 11 11.1,1%&�� � V ;* I , , ", , , " , R M "�,� � I ,�, ee, � , , � �, ,� , ,&N!-I',' �I �`!,',�Ili � " ,,,i� 'Em", R P ,�,,",`,,,,,"k,,' �"'-'x l" ,i�"',;,�,�,,',' ""I� " I I � ,a - , U ,X � �.".h 91�1.11'x, ,- ," -' ' , �I ,�� , , 'l ,-,�, � � � � I I ,,, , I " �--,�Y - " ,; � '. " � �; , , "'Z'5 "4 -,,,,,,,�` - , ,-" " I , I - ",,',',�,�,�,,Q,,� I , -,W K��,� �, v Q,�'"',":," I I. ""'N'," "'.111, -, ''-�,�,,�,��"-"",� �"j I , I", I-� lkl - , 9 1, W ,�N t -k k X , , �', I 11�5=11,, " -,,,,,, ""p--', � "�P, '-��-',"�I " -, - , ,O - ,t,'-,� �, , .... , dl§ - --,-., ,,, , " , "', g�, I, 11 ': , , � , . � �5 ,, I "e, I- * 11 I Ql��&, � I ", �Vl�, ,,�,,-.�,��= �� , -l��, ll I'�ll ,,- , ,� I ISO �1�11;,�,,:�,� U,,,` �ll , , , � -, ,, I ," , 4�- g -�-, 111:�, I "I I . -,, ,�'1111 - �� -�,--,, -1 ", - , � ,, ,�,11 IBM$ " lz�,,, FR�-,-ZM- I.,i',',��',4Z 'W ,,&'�, ,�,",&,,�',�,, ""-' - 403 l,� - - � " u , �,-- I I I I'll A.T� -=-- - , � , , I " , 1-1-11, I - , - , ''. -7' ",M "z , I l ��", ,;,�:,,�I'a-", Ell �I I ,,�,,-�,,,�,X",,�-el, � -",�,�,,,,,,��,�,,�,���,,�"""�,��', � " I , , - . � I l. "' " ,1,,T-� --�,- ,--7-7 -,"7 - ,,� , , , � �- I.- - " -!I ,-,-1,,, , ,"il, AM ,��,'�,,�A , �,TM , ,v,I.- - - �, 11 - 1-111- -�,��1111 ,I'M�,,,, Z ,7 ,," ,,--loq, ,, " 11 . I �...�, - , , " , " , , I ," 'll �', ", ,,, ,-', ' , "� , l ,� - I - , , " , ,- ,,,- , , ,- , ,, ,,, " , I .. 11" , " , , , " '-"� - "?, - - " , "" , -", , lr� I"I I I - " "X ��'"�'IV,47 - .rim"I , � , , I,, , �" � , ,.,, - , - , � "� " `- - " , kit'A I I V, �l , -, - ", "", ,'i, _, i", , "W,�,',�-�, *� m, - 11-1 ,��, ,mog" - �,-,,� I'll, , mc .,�O, , , , � 11 , , ll.k"''�"'!?�-,,, I -" �,'l �',-' ",-I , - , ,z."I I e,,,.S,P,,�,.,," ,,,,,,,-,,�� ,�-,-"l�-,- -,.�, I -11, , ,�, , 4 , �,,- , -, 11 ,l" ,," �N 'ut 'k ,, �� , , , �k",� - " ,, �I "I'll"1,���%% , , -- '- " � � I.... I 'I --',�� �,,-, �' _,A', �-�"I w "l-�,,,�!� . ,�, K�Q,', % - - g,� � -�A , - ,f - � , w- �, ,zv ;" , �I�--�,,N�:�,, 5 - , � W,,,,�", I 11,111, - , I - " � I , I 11 - , , I - � � - ,,,� 0 ,;- , ",,'�', " -11 , " 'i 8 -, � , � :, , ��� N ,, , � , qi,,,� � 6 , ,-�,,, � '' - ,,,,,, g m I I I�,",� , I -�,W- �, ', �lll,,'Xv,*�,, , 1111-' I'll i'' ,�, . ,3,,',�M, , &;��" OR- ,, ,� ",, "I I 1-1 I , - ll-MIIII , � "� , " , ,�. �,_� ,,�,,",I , , ,-", - " �� 1-11 ,-1, , I" ,�, "," " ,v Wl� , - , - , � I, I I 1,-, I'-- V,11 � 11'��l',-V"'"""' - , W, 1-1. I �--, - ,�," , M,n"a, '-.1l - , - "� I N 4 �,_,,,A,"'�,,,,,,,Zz", - , , " -, -� -�,�', "o) l , ,, , , e- ,� � �',z�z l?""', "V,,,, ,��v, -I � il,�",Ii� "I - �", '' ITI, �,,��E i ."'-ll".�-�,'?K"-',' f A ,-", , , z �� , 11treated ,�, , , , ", I'll,, not-) , . "" K -�r - -" - , I 4, ", , I'll I " 11 , ", ",4"U , , ,, C ,�',�, � - I" �,- , , ", i �,,, - ;,��, " �, ' 1, � ` " I", ' - " " ,� ' " e,,-�, "" " � t"'k, , M ; 1 ,� �, ,r 4, , , MR m 4- L , �� 11-� , ,� ", "I'P , ,, ,a ffft �I,% v '! 'll , 1,14 I 'k"" "" ' ""'--- ' ,,l � 'i" ,"i'�-- , ,�,`� - 11 , , V,-,A - , d,-[i �',,: , , ' '?, , , ,- - '� - �- , ", ---e"-,,,,-, -1"n , , ... � �_", ,, ' ' , 1`��,,,�,,&I' , ���,,a,,,M � ,i , 1'07,'�,",U, -,�" � i. ,,si �, -i� ,M0M 11 1, - , , lhd"IT,,1� , �!� k, I bt bxi .,�`�, 2 0�-',�'31' "' - �� �!ll,� -, -, "l , � , I 1-51111�- � ; , � ,�. , , !� " - , , ,pg ... " ,13l�, -'-,,,�,,�-,,,�, - ,P,,,�,,; ", ,� , " "� , ",� " , 11 11 - A , ,% " 'S � ,, -1, I A, -, ,�', 'N",�l",%', " , I I "'N' T�,,,'�,� , , l-4, , , . � , g -, _N", I'll � ,.�, W',ll",� , ,l'," - , , ,, I ," - , �,,�W'k "a-MO " , ,� l"m -�,,,'ll,'A,,,l,-�,',I,, ," ",� , - -I", "Yt�',,'�. -, -, " �, ", , , �a� ":, ��-�,',,',,-,�,-, -"--�, �V�,� , X,l, , , ',kp%-"-,,� ��...... ,� l, �,�,'�,,, , -", �` - ,� , ,, M,,,, , - , �, ,, ,�,, ,, , ,;,,I III'-"I vl "'," 1-1�-",l�. �, -", xg;'�,,. ,,�"" '-,.,, " ,,,, '%" M 1� �' 1� -, - �- "ll-k � 'k' ,� , "v .',�,,,��?"', ,- �, -ka ,11, -�,",,,��w,,,, . ,,��"""'gl",1,, , -��,P"� , � , 11 -" , ;� � " ',il v , , ,", ��-, � -,. N.""Ai, F � , ,;�"I k'A',� �, 4 �, - 'i " �?I , , � , "', "M , , , , " , , -V , , � �� T, , I- , � �"�,,""- "',, , � - -,� �.......:, 4 "A -, , ��l� - , � ,-', � ,fR'j," �� �� ,I wyl, ze, 11 k'-,� , � �,,�,,,,,", W ."', )-,� � "", � m� ,,,,,,�-,�,��� � L ,'� ,,,,,I%, - -411' -, 'A -,, ',,�,,�, " , -,��.I� .",,I,, ,,, , " " ,,, - , , � , "M , . ,", "�,�z� - I -""- 2;P,'," ", , "', , , , ��,"�', COW,�,,�Ns',,-,,,',,,,��,, , � ," 1,1:1 1,11--,, -I." , � ;l - -,�, ", ,m , I l , ,, ," ,-,., P',�, , " � "-" �, - ,,,,, ,, v -, I , ""', ,-; , , ,, I - �Illl I" ,, , ,��� " � , � I ' - 'R",,"-,,, , '', Wv,- , " �, , 4""" i �,,,-, nl�l ."'.-,�---11", �,",-*, "W M , A' - � Q � , - � ,"I"�lnl � kl� , ,"'""-�,'li�,�"'l' �� ", -- ,�. , , , , I "�l'w""17",I"'l "'e"'.4 "ffi' --,,� , , - ,� 4,, -, -,� " ,,, , li _F11,11", 'X ' , -.� ,, I ,��,,ll, 11" ,`�,,-, , � W I I ,�kl -A,'g, 'I, ,,l4,,,I,lF�*)",, , go -, "I'll �,�P ,"V" ,,ifflk " , , , , "I, I I ,"' I ,I f JA-,,,"I,,� "�, , �,-`,,,-', -,,,,4� Nkz�,,:,�fl, - , � n�. ...... , " _', '. - � , .1 I '' I " w,- A-k I'll I , , 11 , '. ') - , , v , , � T'," , ,,,,,�O,; . , "' , 4",��11-� -,��'�',,",',�� -, � ,, ,k � ,, ,, � , 'I"', � � , I � ,,, ,"�-, "' ,,,,, , � U. ". �-, ?- ... ... , ... , ","I""'n"' "'-- ON I 1-11 I , -tv V " p" I � � ... � I RWI� _4 ._,-, I I I 11 k� , ��"` ,�' " , ... � I "',� I-- ' � aw, " M `� I , - � 'm � ""� I I - - - I� 1, �k�",- -" I ,elll , - , �l A Z,-111-11 -.-I "q" ,�4l�l,,'� I " . , 4 ,g,,��- ,�-," --"T , IV,, I k� I � I�I , \ - - , , , "NE I , , I ,,�'YV,�,,�v* .�,,�* -� "l,I�,'0"�,\T ,F"\'Q:Q" IT I �� I �`I-,, , -,-- git - , - �l,l", ,_4 - -, ,", ,g,. , , , ,,� , "' k Raw - �, , I , 'I, -- I � "'ll- 11 I 11-111.p�k,',,,-,,,,,� �,,, V" ,,, � k �, I" , ,,,� ,, IWV", ,�,--� l�,""" I . " p,� ,""', , �, , I 111- ' ,Ilk , , , , - -, ,,, 2""t�,S%��PM';-, I -- g`4 OfMi,"' I ,17 - � , , - "??N , -'k2"�, g,M, l � - I -�,, " ,W � �, - � " 1 - - , 14 2105 _ M" 't,,,, - l �', , Kati ". I W,,I",1-1, , --��'%'M4x", 'J� , �� , I, C', : -,,,-ivl,,', lr ,I ,,,� I , , I �1', , 11,, K , -, " 1 '4-,�,,, ,, , �,.' , N 'A """'ll>" ,, "W 'k,", ,, " , -, , m 1"I , "" 'MA"w A,,�,Z-",-,, "�!��,;,,Wk�'-'ft- ,�,,, I , " , , , ,,< I I -I �, I �� W4EA`W&,' � I �111lell � �,, , , , - 4,I 11 � Ii; " - ,'ll�,"�J"6M,""'V � �''-Z,� ,7,',""-�,,,---, - �r- , , , " 'o', . , ,k,x,I ,� . .. "", I I n ,,,,-:" �q3 'p 'NEZ .1, ' ' I W, ' " , ��,, A ,"-" I --� - I � ky, , I -, I I� , ga, � 1-01 A; ... " , �,-- , ,, , --I ,- 11� lll��Iq �k , " 7, ", , I'll "" , $ m I ,� ,, ,,,, , � , " , , ,,,-,"'ill, I I � 1, "I �Ilt,14 1 t , .�, ,Axa�,,, , , , ,'l I ' ' Ell, � � ' %U-k: , I � I IWI �Il , 11 � l, " - 'EM � � - � .- -R ' '- - I ll , - , io, - ",a - ,,V, - 1111:�,�'N , , , "" � �--'- ,-X,� -� , � '�,,�-',v�", ,� K I 1, -- " " , , , -1 , ' - " '' 'C, , ', "' ' , " , " , �,, ,,w , l, ,I- , I --,'3-:�� ,, , - , ellt-"Iy,*",�-I'-�`��, , -- � I'll • I-I - � , " - , � ,C;az a A , . 1111141�1-,,�-� , � I'll " . c m A, - - - - I"I A , ,. ,I mo, � "-, " I � ," �y , , "I �&,,l�, - ,� , � ,�'- ll Rw "', , " - - , - ",,,a�lm " - 'll, - 1-> ,�n �,� 11 "k .- , �,,�.<v�, '�,�� I h ".�,-��,,J -`� , . , , , I , I" "MILA " 11 ,f �4l " , "l-', -,,,,-, I- " , � 11, , , ,, � � � ; "44,m--,- 1'1-'�Illk,';j�" �, , ,-, , - w, -�,I , " - ,,��"% - ",- , ,,, ,,, ,,, , -g,�' � 11, 11-1 ,,,, � ''' , , �� 11- ,,,,,,,,-,,,,, " 1, , , ", �,,. 1 4 - �-I � 'I' '-, " , , � - I '' , , , ' ' , J�,plg -", , , , , -11-1, IQ"",,-"'-, - ,�� , , - - � --�� I "U'l-', -�k,�-�l- I ,,,, ,1111Wlk�,' 11 " �, - t ���Jk,,--- , " ", 'i �� 11 - 1� I I I - , , "'o " ""� "ll"k k " 1-11� , '* , , Ow"I'll '�Ilv,le��'- '�k, wl�', , F� .p�', z IR -, ""I-,-- 11 , , ;1-� --,,� -IM1,11%, gw _" ... ,-, ,,rV 'l' "I I � � ": , ,, ,�� � - , , , � ,- I , , ,,-, L ,�k�- " - ,",i",,"'--�& I I � " I - , ,, , ,- ,- �� k iR --- ", , , , " , - ", ,,, ,Il,"Il "IP I �141',1, I I I'll,"-,�"I'll", 11 11 , , 1, "11 I�, , F4 '47 "',", - " ,"-", '' - :, ,�",4",��,,�,,�-,�,,,�,,,��,4,-",am 'N.- "A"', `�1111'� , - "'M 1, "IR, "A'All'I-I I I I I ,,, ',2, z-w "l- , , I . , 11-1, �� � W ',- , ,,,k�g-,-"�,�,,�,,�j�,-,,-,,�. - " I "' X -, �- , ,� - ,''I" ,-k , ": � ,��0 1, I 11, ".1 '��,,,'' "'I'l" ��,,,, , ,.��� I I �k� , , 'xk �",� ,,, � , ,, j, .1 I , ,7 - ,-,,�",,,4">,' �, � -, 4 ,-;,� �� P- , l, , � , � , ',---,-k"" "', : - � - ,�,�;,� , W, �,w , , , " " "� '. -' I ,, 'M - IN u " -, " ,0 , ,� - I, - lw � :� '' � "",yl,g V,�w,> � 6 � , " - , , , It �� � a "A �,T,,,, ,I �,,,�, t,-- 1,� 11 , , �', -11 � � , �', , ,P M-," %�,,��,t 11 111.1- A-- " ���, , ,4,I"K� Q � I��,,-�,� 111. �� I"m , "I ,., m �-,,,, � - A - � , ...>, � , - , , ., ,- , - - , -�ll - ,j',qvQ , 6 l�- I" , � � , ,�,,,, . 1, r -, ,;,","le ey", " --:,l,"',"X, �-� � , V1,11 I I �I �� A �-- , , , , .�,,, 'I'll , , T;lZIII,I!lII, -% N -�,,�,�-,',",�,-��_,,!, , ,4 lk',�"," , � "'V - ', l�� '� ' - , k � , , " ,�, � , ', �'�' '111I.Vp- � % ,p,,,,,,'�,,',":,, ,'�," , ,,^'.Ym��"�!g , ", 'Tll ,�l,,�� ��', - , ,," � A,, "" f"', ,','!�Rlv�, g" -� N,' �""-, �- ij,If �-,,, , , ,V'-,\ \�511111-��, l, ,-:,l�,,,�,"' I M, � - , �li -11, I , � 1,"', " ,'�- 0,' ' ��� '-,,' ', N-11'11z� -- V�-, v ,g -, " --Ill "" " -- � , " , � `,- M, ,f ", I I , �,"�,,,,��,'-U'-,' -1 "", >!,4�,`-,,,,r,,, , -,"'.-, �l , ,,'�, ,� ""'k,lm'T, §,,,�, 111,l� �, , 11 11 , ,Y,,,,, , �- I ,�,,", , .,,,-��,�,,-1, � ,'Y"'N",,,�6,,,, , �A�' -, -".- �,�,,,�4i--,�'-,,,,, �11 , , " , "A"l," I , ,, , "I 1� W, �� ��re � , , * M - �"f',,,�,'-,' " ,S�Oil I , , , I , e,�.. ... .. , - ,�,,�e,,%,-, ", - , , A-�"'" , � , �...,; �, " , , .l,,, ,"'M - " Z,,-n !", -4 , � 'i" , . �", " " ,, , 11 , ,k%4 " , , �W- -, " , 4 " ...j -,", l, , t , , , - '', ",, ,I ----�. ,,�,,, � t S ,� 4, , -I � � I , . g , �,,,�,,,I"-, -�, - -w , ,,T� ,�i � " , , � ,4 � Ir N - , , , II I , , �Zlpl`1, , F. , -1VII V, ,,� , � , ,C , I I - A � M , ,",,,,,WIN �,� 11-�I I k,� 11, , I,:""" � I Y'11 , "me--v ni�"7- , , g I v, , �� ,�-,I-1 -,'� ,,,, a m"'y", 0 "' I I� -1,I 114�I I , ,, , , w - l�� 1�1g�, I -,,�,i , , , I-��', ,/, -, ok", - �,-,-,,�,��k�-,--,,'T,,-VF "R, I�, 1111,11 11-, " I ,�Z'' , I ,�,V�1111 I I ,� ,,K,,,,,,,,,�,. "fin "', - ,�p,, ";l", ", ,,z,NRw ", -14 , w - I i�t""-,".,*-�, "��,,'","" ,�'-' " , ,- A -�wf"Y",*1 Ill �, �� , I "I', I , , - -',,,',' W , ,��,,� 1-1 , 'i�........-,-� �,I � �.' ,%,-,-,,,,,,,,,_ - I� , I ," 1, - I �,'--",','��:,Z,�,,,',�,, v,l,,;,,,,,,, ,,-�,,l, ', " ,r, U b"--,,�,e � I ] 7 I j: � ,,,-,�l,�;,��-,, , ", 4, �, - I I :� , " ,,, � ",, �-,," , -,*-",� ,;,," A q ��,,,, "I,, �, �"'� o " I � ,,, I , V: i � ,:14 111�1, �1w,,- , 11 - , . I ,,, ,r, : , �� �, ', ,S, , 1, , � T,�I m ,'I a �"" , , " , ,�A,,, , �;", �,,,-,, ", - --,- - n g ,,,, ,,-!' , ,KF -,-,� N' ' "t , N,", , , - "I "I'll, " -I k%pi�j U<� , , " �tt,',�,-,J m' '!"" r� ,,- 3�1 F , `111",' --,-�'lh , ,,, - , - , " " " "'�, " - �-, �,,, , gdp,si�v k �,,�,�,, - , , ""I ' ' �,'. ,, ,� i�, �,,,:�I 1-1 ", � a �, ,�xdi 11, I -� ,ce .,>, d ��,�,,,'�l>�, II , , ,-, ,l," ", 81 ;, "� ��,,,,,,', �-, � ,wl*"�,, "' ,,%- - , ", , 5 -" , I - ,,,,,,,,,-;"k�,,,,, - ,� ,'--.l,-,,,-"-' ,l - - I - ,,, ,,-( � ,, � 111, '111.1- I I 17W- -,, " ' l�I ' -, � -,,,', ," , , 111-11 "" ', "1 IM 'A wt �A w1i- 11 �? I "t �-,�- ; I .1 >"'- , I I.- � ,;, 10 `tea" ,11'1,� -, , - " , , --, ...�, ,'! , I , , , � , • 11 I ,-� klg, '-,�, -- " , "-,,-�,�'Zk ......, � � -w." �� �,, �,-,: - ,',,,, , �l, , * � " IP�,"V,-,,-;" ,�,,,�,,, , , � "ll. �5,"4 11 ll I "1, ,-, 2 -,,, � ,�, I" I' ll ', Ill ," " � I ,,,I,`�I',,,',,,, � , - I, ",-, - 00--r- I ,>:,�,,,'-,�',,,,'�%'"�,",��kV,' ,,"RI�W'�I'MOMY"I- 1111 , -�---,k- " 11 "I ,".a"��,,, , ,1,5,�, 'T ",- -lkl�,�,'Ia'.,,� �!,,��,�, , ""',"�,, �HE - 1,�", , " , I 0, _ I . I ", ""I 11 - , � , -1, 11 ,�,Ap�� IM, ,", �, , I , "I � �, - v "t, " r " - I I __ " , ,111 I , I , ,,,, , �,��,,,,,-,,��,,�,-��',T ".11, "�,,' ...��:l, ', ,j,", la I -, "I � -� --, � , '& E - , I,I L , SA, I x � - -,� I , � I'g,�-:, I , k ,,l" , F, , ,,---,I , ,�,��, 20W , -1 -, , , ", 'I, -� "'w, � � ,S ,"��," ',',�, "', ," � �� � ,,, w', -1w I'll " , I ,- W,Q l;" �,�', ,,"",l,-,,,, " "', l III, 'j�j""I" � , I �,`,,,�, 1111,11-11, I I- Illkl I,",'"r ��"--I 1� w � ";"-'1111- -, I" , , ",, 'l, -, ,,- '* - , �� ,-,�'�,'-.`,,'-'--l�',-11-I"zll"Ill- ��,,,k, ,�', I , -�,R�,,�,,��,�,j,�%,,,,-, "MI I , , , ,4",k- " : ,\ V,',,' , �� ,--,-�,��, � ,, - --m-t 'v:', , 11 , " ,.�, -'." , � , , I I I ,--,,�,'-%- F S A �"'In, t ". "'l, -'� ,�,�-'z'Q'z 11, , , ", W, �',, , "I, , I " " I 1-1 ,1,111t, , -, � 4 k", , � - �; ' -,� "'' I'll", ,.�, V,�m " I �-, < - �-, l'j, _-, - -,-', ��"c I� , 11, " ,'. � , " " , I I , �1�1�,'�� ,,, ,,,�...... ,,,, "v,,- , - �11',�,gl,,V-, "I 1'1��-,- --,M""f" , ,, , in ,",I , " "I --I I , , -'� ,�,"- -I- , I I , " - , ", l,, , - , , ,'I , 't,,,,,mR 1,I i - l,T-,,,,,�R-,:,V-,,-,� Wk`� , -- 1� ,t , ", ', I ' ,., ,, I", " J 11 I . ,� .",t " " � "'-� �t v ",- ,"O ", , - I �� " ", - p i, � , , � ,-�l- " P-M'I'Q -'', I I I 11-I " , , 't"'11- ' '"I , A a I ("I, I �p , , , ',�- ,,,,-,,,N,oM ,Il'T'SW�NT'Apt "tz,-- , �- O "' "," " "' , �-�� ,,,-*'-,,,,� "'�4�,,9t0v , ," m , i... All,�,-, \,�;, ,�"2"""",-,""k,-, , ,,�",� � - , i.i.r - ,�q� l-- ,MM�!4 ,�11114� '11-1- _ :" ".",,�.",.,)", % -;.......� � . , I'a" � � , � " "� 11 "I " I, ,, � ", ,, \ ; , , "", axe' , -- - " - ,� 1, I , - � - �I ,,,,A,��" , ,- , 11 I " �t -,�, " , , ,� , , . -,� ,� I .. - , , l,,',� ,,:_ ,�- ,,""�",,,;,',V,-,- 4 M,$7 V,,-;,�z I "' , , ",'-, -'�-ok ,�,-',,, ,�"'I'02! ,'�Ii '*t',Zvl�z' �','�,""�- "I",Yj�z_,"�,,'I,�"',, � � l�,��", � , I l,,�'�,� "I , -,- - - -,�� !"�M� " - �'>t, , , - tl �,Ip,@ 1'7 -,�,,,,,:�,,,�,," � I , iA � , "M ,, "l�7�, -, ��,,'61\�,,�,'�,*-Z", y � - ,A, ,,-,7:- - l,�� u - � ��,Igg',,� �g, " Iff!", " - M," , , t, , - ,A,',�`,;',,k is �,I, , I " 12,1 9 , ,% �*��,,,,,,",�,�, _ 4 ?��5'il�,��,,-, , A -, , , �,*a 'M -1- I - �, , ,Vl,1�� -�',;,;�,:,,',�",' I - I , I'' -l'� - ,�,,� �l�,�"-, ","� , 'l - , ", ,l " ,z�,,, ,Y,-Jk,'��',�,;',,,l�;- - k,� , , l' - �I -- , ," -, l-I .�...� 0 9"Cl - 1�1 , - ,, �>, - . L g � � - , � - , I l�, '', , l-, ,,�,,��� , XWI-,-��,,-k "', ,,�zg'g'&g�m� ,"--",:-.-��- ,,,��,�-,,,-,: Al , - -,�,,,, -,,,�,��,,,, , " -�� " ,, � , ,;, '�-, ., v a �,,- �� "" ,�,,,��, - -, , , , I I--,� '�,, ',,,,,� , , ,_ �,�' ��r !,,�,� T-W "lln' ', �" , , , ",- -�,.-"'; -, , ,, 'lk' M,,�,-,\;E, ,, , M '4 -, , , , , , - , i Ull,11 � � t� ,'7,' " ,",'�, ,�,," 5 , ,,, ,A "' 9 ,�� ,,,, <�%, � , , , , --, -,�,, ,, , � ", , ""i'v"�'I "", TvW, " ' ' -� � '%" -,,,e" -� � ,� -, , l ,,, 1 'N �""�'a , �j� l, " -; ,v , ,� - , �' IjA I -11�e-,'�li , . ,�, - , , � � , , � I I ,�P,,,",- I I'll - �,�R m,K, - " ""-":'' , , a,w......I ,� � �"Ix, ,-,,>,Z""W_ ��",L . , , 1 , '4," - " 4",",,,,�,�, � " � - "',k?, I�111 I -Ir "I I 61 �,��, ", � l� . , .,1,1'�', I , " m , � =131 , Iw'I"l,IlI- I - "I , ,,� 11�1 �� �11�)�� ' , �\ m " ,lS � -, -1'-�- 3R , ," 11�I - , - k I e � :"W"'JoRN, R "�,,,,'M -, , - "" mlmlk�- '�,'�",',"�-,L�� 1, I '411, 0-&,.*:"�Ir,-,-' I I;lI, ��,�� ,',',\ C, , -0, - , , , - ,,, , "" ,;, � ,� � ' �lla�l,kQ JI'11 I -,',�,,: , ol I - I" ,§,,��, 4 , "I , � "I,, 11 ,�I:l - � I , 1 , ,I � , � I � , , � , "t' " ""� ""�'j,� ,M, , "A "l, I " 1,131t, , I"l-,"� -V """ I I � I g,,,�#,-,,�,'�-,,,,,',�,,,, 'S, ., "�,�� �," , - -%k% ', _ "- , , � , ,�;i 'n . �', �', ,,, "', 11-11'1�, � I I � " , , ,-- 1� " l, Oi�,,, ml I ,, "' ,,, � " ,,, '- ,,�- ", ,��,-'j - , " I�;",N,2,,-�', ,, 'L om� I " I I � '?"�l�,'% m ,�,,-`,',�' as I x- ",,,, " " � "'A , I'l,'k,�',� ,�.......% ,, , ' 'm� , ,:,C,l "A� ,-I 1, -� �', � 1, �,,,-,'," �4 �19 ll" 'k, -:�,,O,��-/go glll-�.� , ,, I " ,M ,-,,,ZNv, " � I 'm ." , i - a�� ilg; -,> : , ,,� .k,�Q,,,,�, , ,,,�,,,,.,l,-,,' - " ,-,� ,g,, --t,��,,;l, '� "�,�'� , � � ������,' - - - I P,11I,,I"",�'II, �,,,S,�a,',,Z , l,- l- l � � E , 1, "n,,I�, - " " . I -,-�, , , , -,, K�,- :- -,� -�IQ M�?,`, - . �� , " , - , , -.,�V, X" -W,�"f",4---- '�l:�- W, "t, �-'��' ,i,�','� - ig,'� , " , ", " -�- , , .0 I lk, , , , - 6 " , 11 � I �, 11- ,., , � 11 x , �, 31 w a.mz �" 11 111,"P,,�,", ,V � "W O_lw ,,, : �l',,, 3 I r mc� 11, , M;\" �141 � "I 11, - . -, - � ",\g I'll, 1- - -, ..-n, - -775,kl,� , -,- - - tt�7t'�,, 1, ,ft,�� ? , 1,1 1 I �z,I"v , I , l� - ,',;,, ,�,A", rx , � , " , I . ,t "' j R M=;,V�, ! I' ' w - - I ; i,*�"a � 11 :�, - , I ," . Z'",,: 1 � II I � ,"',2N", 'lZ�.,,:suw " 93 v_ " >', -C V-1.v_ I 11 �, I �,4� �,,� g J t�� ,� *c;,�', b", , _W k, I, " � , I , _ I,� ,t � ,I, 11 , ", W "�,� i - I ,W _ 4,,, " II, _ , � ��p' " ,79 ' , I ," , � I, - 4 'g ,e �e4S�,� , g, , "� , .a11ff, , ,IM ,�� vl 4mt `<, : _ w �",� k,a: _,; lliYl I "I "I �� , "I 1'��I'S "�, ��. `,rl ,,, , ,,,, ll� , ,, " -� I �-1,1�lff��,��,,�I �',,�, I I � - , ,� " . % .�', _,� - , 'W�T , - ,� -, I Q/�,� I I,'*, _ ,��,� , , I � , 0, , ",� , -1 �, " , - , ,� ;, I �,, I ,,''."I ", , �,_ I ��', � �',�_� "M ��,M�,,N"Q�'a ,, , � , �I ", � , , 't� , - � - "' n , � �, , , " &I", ,,,,, � - , - ,� �, � 011,�l 1�� I , � .,�,1,1'1, , ��, I -�`,�, ,,�,, , �,.v"',," "',-, ,,,,,, �x '__ * , - , � 1�I , �, � � , "-'11�1�1 1, , , � � , ,� f , _�,','� I I,�, ,-, I I �,I I I , ll�� I ?M,iNl ""I,- � I��- ',��,:,Z_-',, - ,,i�',',,,�,,, ,� ,_z " 1-1 "'I" I ,� "',� 11 , ,,',Z�j,' T,� 1�I- ,�Il I , ,- :7z ,,,, " -, I I- , --,:g, 11 ,V 4 ��, , , ,,,, �� ���,Wll�R ,'� ,� ,F 1-1,,�g�,�. I"��, " , I,� ,�_�_ �. � I I -1l ,,,� "O'g?,,�,,, .I, , I M"'l- 'k'', , " 11 , , , ,", I'M" , I, .� � I ,;��! , "Wilk " I- I-I I .,�N', 'J�, , g" , I , I ,I,I 0,Z*,,1,�,W , ,,� ," - �,- I -11 ,,,",,,. � , ,�,�,,,,1`,� , ,�:�,,',,, - M � "%iiwl,'V� � ��,,` �� ,,, ,� ,��_ , - J�l 11 "I - - , ,�11 , I , , !,�,',�&'! , 'IF , -, � I 11 , � , U � , ��, 1,_, " I We,,,,, , -5 �`l - ,, �I �' I I I � ,'�,M�V, -'' y" El , Z � ,�� I " I �--, �-. -,-�`?', ,,"�"i"�� I,1�,�,,,� ",,"i " - , , " � ,�,V4��,,' "'W,,Q I" ��`""" llMl_1 I .��, ", , " , ,-, -" f, � _ 11 -9,-.1"'. , 11I, 11-I� �"I�",,,,,, , , -, w I , ,, , 11 "I�'_l _ I , 1,'�,�'�q� �!�l " �,,,, - g", . 'A I - ,, ,�,� �, 1, -, I �,' �, , I��-�-',, "I , � � I`1r I�M I p'! �M,`�` H, ", - '-, , , , ,,,,, , �......� ,�� I ,,111, "I- 71 V�,-_, � I .1, ,�`, P�. � .,,Pr4,�,,, ,�� �, I I 1,�,�u�_ "I � "�',, ', �1111. . I'll,�,,,,,��, alc I, � � � � _�� .,';,,,"�M� �, �I-1 I I I "'C��, v - a- 1�1 11'' �,;l�,�,Z�� " -�,, I I , 'Ift?" ,� Pi "I 2' I'll-_ "I , - ::......� �"-_"�,, ,�,",�,",`.:� � �,i,, ���,R.1""31�" r ,:_."Ill , ,it': 11 , ,�"""'��x " "W"W,,",,,,,, A� I, '17�11 , ,�'� ;, , "A' ,- -�-:i -PRI, � � ,�_,, ��,, 11 ?A� ,:_1'11, �' " ,,, I I I ,I I I 0?1 , �, ��l �,�17�'114 I I"1. - , 1, '," "�,'; , _�, I- r'! " ,"I ,_�,'2 ", I , ',,,,�--��',-",�,��_', "I_4 " - - "o , ,_, I , 1,,�2�,- ,,�__- ""j,"� - � "' " ,�, I � I , ,, I,,III " _ .4v, , ,� ��,�",,,�, ",%_ ` ,I I , "" 'A ,�, " , �l I'll ,�,,;�,.4_,._ , " . ;l .�"jii=�4.� 4, _4�, -I�"','�";� ��� ,, % � , �Z I , �M 1---m-��I= == ____ ===?�-no �_ L , ,,"All? 4W_Iltl_l�l&` '5"�, " �, " _14�� , `� ����-,,, � � I , I� '�f� ""',4 , ,_I,I I'll �,I I , ,, 'O'' ''� "I...,'�-�,,', , ,"'o, , , "' I I- I. ,�,, �I'R!L� - .-.- ��,,--.,�.,�.,�.�, - L:I�,� - - - , �, � u � i � "-, -,� -7--, '7,7 -, ,_ _ � 'i-I I 11 IX�, , ..WR ,��vm,;� ,�;,,,�,,,, &m�"T"',"" " ,"K, ,l,<1,6' g'4-,�,'' . , � , �, �I I lll�, a "�, 1� 11 "ll- _�', � � , �Z, ',�� '" ',,i " -,- " ', ,' "", _ W, ,, !,__, --,, iW�ffi�pji '-�.�"�';,� I �3 -� � i` _,,,,�:��,�--,,, "� " �1, , �_ ,-W', I I,&"m I 11, I, _��- 11 ��", " � , , ��� , 'At ; -�,,M,'," 39', , 11 1, I _11""'e, _'_ & 2. 1�,,,, �, ,,, llll,� I'll-1�1 "", ,, � I -i , , I " �,,�",��,�l�,,,,��,���,�,�,�,,�,� ,, �,, �_� � I , "�n �l�," I I, 1, -,;- ,,,,:� �, , , .,� �,""-,'%�� , , , �' I -, -, � ''I "" ''" `� -,,,, '� - N "' -4 , gt,� , i , ,,, I `�','k`',',, - `,� , �"�,,' , �,t, ,, .V�!"j, "", 11 ,\ _ 1119 ,l , � * , - .. ;-,§@y'� ,',��W, - - , , , , ",l, , i�, "s",,,,,,�`�,,'��,,',,ok.,,"_'e�-,,� , "',, ,Z� ,,,.�%,-;"�'i��,,,,�N%,I � g* "I""" � `,,�,��'&, I 1, &"I'l�-� "I'll -r� ,�,�"��'"', ,� ,�� , d I " 1111 I - �" -,,,�� �� .,� -, 11 I I`a - R 1 1 � "�, _4 ,�4k,, , - , ,__ , � , I e�� �, , ,,V �g �-,,�-",-"-�,,,,,,��,',,:,�� I �i,�,�, ,R�',�',, % _,,�;,,,�?'_ ......� " , ,,-�," - , , _4$1 4 11 1��1' i,12"1,111111,",�`,�11, I I . ,� I 1� 11 1�,,'_'��`� , ... &g,_ " ,p " ;�� � " � ,�, �,�',�......;��Z,�,,. ,ivaa 6��_ ,,,, "u, ,%, I " I , , � ,, , �, 1. -�'Ill I- , " ...%P%,,� I ,, 1111-111'I � "" ,;,�&'-�,,,"-,,,-, , , - �1'N �,'I,,I-11 M,1,1,�f�, I 1�11 ��I,I�lw 1',�-,,,"',, " , � ,;,t" , v ,� � MK� v,", All ,,"Y��"-...... ,�,�'T`ft" "- - - - 1� r , ",,,�, 6_� � , , ,,,,5� �_X'� - -;,-� `�'_l- - -�,k� � - , , ` ll�'I'V I,_��,J.,� 1'3'.��11�1 I1 �A,,Snov,l , , " ",11- �,4 , �l ..._, " - ,,W,, ,� lll� �� I ,� "."'," ", � ',", , , , , '�"g,�,,,.%,,�,� M MN,�,;, "�>w , I iV - _11_1,1�., - ,1- �, - 1','�I, 11" . IR , , � Q,?,A _ -�ex- ,. , , 1�',I I I'll, I -",;� I a ��ax, �x MI'll1 11 I'I,,,-",,-," � Mml 11 -:-,�,ff','-���,,, ,-�,-���4"4 ,M, I ,�,:&,� - ....�,, _�-, _', ,',�, n .1�1_",� "' _,�., �" �,,,� 11 ,, , �"" E3P�,I_"�""II:��,���"-".�,,����"', ,�5m, �,,;, ��P ,� `��, �-,�,,,�,�� I 'r�, , , 'I ",I ��1�1, �,�- "" I- M 111 I I ,ul I t 'm '�`f Z� I -_ 1� " ,, ,,____",,�,r��,"kWN ,�-, .,�-.� , , � ,,,� 'v",�� v I "11��:,__ - �'l� I; , , , � - I ,1111 �,; �', - - - I ,"':,,;,_�-�,'�,_ I ,Ov ',',,�', " - , , , ��,��'1`1114 I _'_'-&. ,g 1� " �� 11 ""I'll, �11W� "__,� " ""ir"e,�"�, ", �-, ,, � � - ,�, , � , � x " I ,_ "� ,� 4 ,��,��,,�,,�`,,,-,,_,, � , 'Y_,,�,", I K ��,eWM,","" 1 ,01, ,-,,-'' ,�?A;"I ,l ul 1 �l - I " �,�'`�, 11 I -� �, I I I I - 11 z" 9 , 'm - �,- " - ,Al"'I"IN"I'll- e " - ,V, , �� , � �,, ,,� ! *,, " � � - "" ,", I Can11 11 , ", , ,,, 11 LI 've , ,i �,� ",'" ',-, a',�"-:�,,W,,, " , � ,�Z�,,- " ,7,� 'U"""'""' ,o11 11 I � � ,Z, eia t �.�, ', ,"' t"" o""""'k " �, re � " _ ,- � ", , 1 `5 ��" I "�, , "" " , """ ' """'"",,'7,""��,,�""71; ,��;� � 111� ,W_ `,�,ff � - W",�,", , ", �� M lk,, �,, -,�,Q- �1'11��A- 4 't, 'I' � - "",�, - ,,�I,Y? ,sg"��, "- ,, I1`�'�Ol � ,A�_',��",_',,� ,�:.-���',5"� ", - - � ,'� . � - , "", �N,�'!,�"':1,""',�m _:�<M �,',"'' IM a�, ;, W, j �15-1, ,,��",*,gi,,,,��,O",, "'g ��, , _�,��, - , �-�',, z,,a�,'-,',,',,,,-,,��,,,�a�� e I 4��R - q ,1`�' , ,l"th ll 11 f""- -4-, I V I ,,,,, __� ,,� _��_,,' ,��_, 11 , " A . ,� , "', ,�, �K F�e����,�,��4 """,""',_V�Yl......lZ , -, ,_'Z-,kv�,,"44 0,�/m�,�,,", , jll v,' � 46, 1 - ,,,�,, ,11 � '' , ,6 �l �,,,,� I , �u 4 - , ,�� , , ,�, , _ , , "' - I , ��;�'w_ I�j� � ,� ,�, , , I "-, I'll, ''II'll- ,," I - I- �� " , _v� I Y , , ._''� � l .11 'I" ,m-,,; 4,Rl"l' 1 ,,� .... m : � "I� fp 7l141,- 34',,, �,� "' - ,',"�/ '' , ., J,��k, " , I ,,,, ,,"� _Q_ 14 _, , , , I" , , , " , , , ,'', , I'M 1 ' , , _,M 'I� ',; rf"�,�,"�', �, , ",5'Bib,*,, ,"�*I,�' ,q"R ,_�,_?t�1,L ""' - ��,`,,, - , , - ... � , ��l, I ...I I ,�,'' ,� , , , ), " 7 I'll "T � , , A I ,__,�, , IN � mr, AS �,� ,�,, ", , V" "I � , _"m 7� � z N','�,��,, ZU,, - - �nen, I , �11 I "� , " " 11 , , . . "," I � -�;l I PIN�ll �l , " , , , "I'll 1, , I -11, , , M7 �S , ,�, " I, N"T01,1114�, ,11"", 1� I I vl�,�ZK- �� ''�',1,11 I Ml ,� �,�"', , ' , , � , " �' ", , o;,;��, , -- � , " � V, , .�S�,l ,?,�-J,q, . -I'l," Mir,W , 'x'.'_, , I I , � �,�� 'y �'' " � ,�"�,",��,�,, , , , , "' ' .... Ao-2", " � , ",, "", " �-1 - I 1, _ " "��g , � I I"s , , ,� f��� , , , _111M _..'Ij�� ,,�, I I " � � "/"��,Wm,,, F: I , � , , ,'A , . 0, , , / I � ,W`,.�,��i�,,:,,' ;A', "" , I-:,- ",/ -,� , 'm �_m "', , , - " , ,I _ , ''I , ; �,`, �' , �T�,,/n� , ,� � 41 3, "I_ " ��,�, , , , , ,�5_4t,,� l -,�'--,,,"", " , , " �, � -, i, , , , , ,i%�, � - , ,,,,- , , r�'K �<,',A,, , _ "'i"", �,�� ,� I�, " -,'.`, ;% -,, � ,11 � ......., � , � - � 1,�V,, �,,l�....... ," W,F 111;F" " ',,A�,,,�,K,', � �•, , �','��f�g�gt� , �'�, IK -, - -, 1��;�,�', , 1^ �.A,�,�,�O , , ,� . , r � _ _ ���, gt :�,,�_: ,,,,," I , %,M."',"� R�� �V 011k, I" _ , 4", � ," W ,, , , � - � "�', ,, "",,", " '� - '' 1 " 1,�,, _,��,,�� I 'Nf? '��111 ,TIIIW�11� " V, , " ,4 1 �=",, IV, - ., " ` I 111 11 I M� �," , ''��� "� , � , 1�', I . lp I 1.111" ': I , . I ll �� '' , , ""'."",Iml 11MIN 1-111 I�1, � -4 , , 1, 1. 11 11 �l V, I � -, -JF "� , , ,, , ,-,'I'll I M1.11T ,v,$ , , �v,,,I - " , I " *M�� � �1`111.��I_�I , _ I �,,�k,""�,�,", ', '' E I , "" I , 6��- �'m ' , OM "', , , 12 N, , I " ," �,'�j _ ,I,�,r I � ��_Il I'M, 'ft,R"Z�,,,,�"1,I �,�, � v � �� " I'll d I � � 11,j�t,"�"�, ",1�4K', "��__ I "I 1, � I - I - I-1"I 1. I I , I - I I'll�'�11 ll,� , 'p, �,j�, �-,�4747 I � � M _ ,*111 , - � I " I il - " p 7 I : ,,,n -g� ,"' '�,,� "'I��,, �', 1, A z , '11'. , , � ""'< , I I I�il , I"- ,"m�,",,m, , -. .".,,,,,-,,a, �� ,4�`,,,,,V', ,/' I �l 1, �� , I 0 , �, � ' ",,h,t li � F, � t � ,, 04 , , -� - ,MM,"':',,, �l p �,i ,,, , ,, "'t ,P!P.�' 'i -., """, '� RN I�X�,I -1-11-11 IT-- ee,, �co.,, � t ,- -,,,s,�� ,,, � ,,,,,,�,', 1�, ,t,n!I 1 41 11"p- l,", ,e ot , 1 , 4 _ ,` INA, ,�`,N,- "W... �- E�.,'�fip�',�,p " v ,��,�"'���,'4�,',,Vr,�,.�,,',,,�,,��-, , - �IMWMIVIMI� � "l-7� I'll, .111'1'1�111 III �l V -1, �l I " ,"171 - ,,, . , , " I'll, � "�',��"'�; � d` m � .,- .. n ONZ I 1Q,.,5"1 1, �I 1',�,.,,''I�', '�,�� "-"'�, -Z-�- I , � I �l ,_,� Rv , �', 1'.',.� ��,�,l ,�� , " , ; 1"",�?�17" 1 � �,71� , I I I - 11, IINI,�O "Ill; 1, !, �,�,_ - " I..", � , ,,',�. _::', �- 11 I,(�� . ,I, � I I ,, " I 'll", I� � "I ,7v,""", �111� .,� I "V �_ I��,, j� � - I 1- " 1,111��1111, t,e -A, ""' �,.,��'�' - M. 1� , mw , -," , R" - I I " Z 1 11-11, A- ,,�,_gf�p'_'�,3�,.I, M , 'N' '_1 I �,��Z.',I� -3, '"'I'll ,��*-"ks f "I ,I�11,�'Il 11 .. V, I E , , g�A � " , - � N L, , ���` 11 ,�l �_, " 1` ',� �11 , , Z, _�_�1, m -, I 11 11 11 < �. I '_ � 'Qk � . , I'— -11-A"V, . , , '��;,,�', , �,, �� ,��.I,I_ ,,�,,` , , 4,�wl'"v,�,�, � %4 I ,,� 'I , ' ' � ...... 1�0�1','Il, , , % i " 4, -1 , �� -,rm -,u,' '."Ill' ,�,, , �� , 'Q"'T�, , ,Z', , � , __,��� . ,�W�,z',/ �""ot�w " R,�,��M_,X" ,," - I I -,�_ , - ,, , " I I I , ��l .1 - , ,�;, , , , � , I_l � , `,'" - I � " I , - ,"i O'E't9�0K,,,, ""I'll, � " , - ,',' _, - M", A � , I I , � , Va, , - - ,,�,,�_"X,,, ,, , ,,,'�'_' �, �, _:', .� I--�',�,-�e,�, ,,�,, _ia�v� " � ,,,, , , ",� Ak , , 'sm I 11 I ", , - . ,l , , , - , � - iN a ", ,I ,, , '�,�'�;'l I I X , , - ", I , ,-- A, ','ft',,f,,�4 , - I I I,111 I 1,,�;:, ,,,,�, _ _� -I l �, , "ll�, �1_ W. �� - I , '1�1'1't"I, 'l� , , �, �,-��, M_ ,, , , . >, , :��4 N I -, -, ":, � " ;� , , , - ,� , "'' ,�, "i"N I -, � ,,,� , �,t��,�, ',�,,'_ ,�',.V:,�, �.,�',',�,V,g, , ",," ,,,BMM,�_ �,, �Il ""''. 11%11� , I " - , , �, �.. ... ....... , ". l 1,�,,�," I" � I " ,1111: , ,l " �,,�• � _�, , , _�",� , �i I'll""i'll'' ,� ,�, 11 , �, � r i ,,_ , ,� � -, - , �_ �d�!,", & ,i,�Jw. -1 ''q, ,�, "', , ,-,��, '; f , ,,�',`, ,'','� �V 'l� , '� , � I- .�, -�� li 1pcl��'I �', ..... , 'a, , ',"��, I , , _ , 64,111 � 1�:�l %_, , _ �� �,� , M w I,ll,�3,� , M I, , ,,,I i , , _ �,, �,," ,�,A" 9, � I 11 I, , 6, N,I�,,j,k-i'�, � , I I IM, "11 11 11 ,� ��t�"'','41���,,�,7,� ,,,-",�l, , ,z,,�* � , __; - " - - "t- 1� gg ,�,,,��'�,,�, �-`;',,, , ','��', "a ",: ,� ...... , ,5 - - , I 11Z, W, , I� I'll 11 � _ - 5, , :,f , I I I , y, u ,,�r � " , ,&'_4,7�' " '/�,'!, "_ ','j�, ,, I ,,, "R'W",�,'A',4�,,� � 11-1. 4 �_ I 11'N �,, '�", �, -_'I,%�,�",",.'\l , Y, , I, I ,� � 'R 5 " I, _ " , � pq -v�,Jl -� �,�!" , , I �' , ," , " ,i 2N,�,�� ,-, ,/",��' �, , , ,��M%��%,I�' '� , - 1'�,11_11 , �, !� , I I ',/�'_'� '��',�N ' � , , ,,,,p�� ,�'Cl,snx,Q�" z"� �-_W' , , I 1'� , _ " - ---1, I - � ....... "" , ,t, j� , I", _ �R , , i �,�,,��� , p "Yl m , , -1 /CA,,,, " ,�f -, !"/ �, yl - , , ,, , �I", &;, I , �I a� �Iffix ,9 'R- ,,�, �� ,zliv, , N --� �, "t��,�I -- � ,Q, ,`�� ,,,,,," " ,r , , -�,1,4,"";��,,�-&�,,-,,,�l, "I" I __ - 1- ,� , " �, , ` SM, - m"�`��l �-� "" W 'IN �,''!'��� 4�",�',,', " � � " g , A" I A , ,��',�t ,,'-",�,?�V�� , ,,, -, a * , ��, -,- , , "" "I P ,, '" , ?I,k - � ' ', "__ , ng.,A 1, , "� ,� 1 ,� ,�`,",�,`��,", `�, , ,:""7','� ,,�m �-__�,, ��,�4�',"�,�S,' M 1)11111� 11 ��,., -1 ," I 15sirlg�O,.,,'J�,,� , '� _KN,-'W - m , , I��I%I , , A , - , ;�i , A 6 ,�, " " , , I 11 - - " Is , , 4 , _ , I q, , VIM' _ , ",.,i.,. , ,�,, . �-�-',e, ' s '' , � , ,,,�� '�;"" �, �q,4�D_'�,� � % ",'' �'1�11��Il_ , ,�, _ �!, .", I, I .-0 ,ul � " � ,A ��, a q I " , I � �, � ,,� �I � � " , - a ," � , ,, ,, � � � , 11 - I � � , , ,��ft, -" � j�,�1�11, , ,11, 1 ,�,�:�,,��,: I'll , ,-� ,,,k,, '�§, * I WIF t MMA I I., - , -m , -, ,�� I ""I"..,�I, ", -', �2?_�;�, �,-';" n,,,�,,`,�", � " �A, � � , ,"i , _;i ", "�, R"M I",I 1,I�1,�5,,� " , , � - ,�, P�,;�,,"�,j:','�,,,_,,,�_�_ , I I 1��ty.� -�'l-'I'�ll.""�,�,�'��-A',�,��,1q,"', , I - "I � � , f " "vll,�� ,j'�,, , , , ,, """ ,�� V, " � `,,�, ,, "x��`,"',',�'1�9,,'"",q_ ,/ , -, '', - ,, " , - _ 1, , �1,�:" , �,� ,:� , I , , I - I'll 11, ll� ; , ,,,, , , ,, , _ , , 11 11 1� ,,,,� �� i 11 -1 � , � �1�11n�ll - 111- '' �", *11, ,", ,,_�',, - , �I -, ,g'm � ,,� , I , ,,,�, , ", � �'Z" X-,I � 1, f �1, I'll,�VWMA,,,K M I - � Aq,�_,' �, ,�,% . v®, �!",':,�,,,"",,, "'t N",I'M�j �'m �' , , ,, 4 ��, 1�", " % , ,. t III � I I'll , ,. _`"," , - I , , , ,` _�, , , I � , �,,- ;�,�- �f,, - � � A i � , , 11 , " 111-11- I I III 11 I, 11" " I , , , � , " 1, 11 , - 'T I ,, � � I - ", " ,,^�Vt�, A " - -, 441k, , �� ,� I �/ �;$j " ,vg', ., " "," ,- 5131111 ,w , I , " -�� ,�k , - /"',� , �,,,, ,',',',�'l , "I , , 'a � A , 7 ,q 'w'-_' " , ,- _P\"> , , � I , , P, � ,�?,�,�:�,, , ,,,� " .M��� , A,�1 �,, ', , � -,- - - M, � 11 M ,,, �,�, '101 r , - 1 , , "i",, ", .. , ,_ , ,I mv -��4,, � I ''I 9, / . - - ' 110 � ON,, ,�!r�'' ,� N , 111,111,� I "u, �`;�,, � .4 g�` ,,'��, ,��, I I ,1��Z. -"k.' �� g E,7_,,, Ek/ - ,-' "kv`�","�_j I ,�il"W" ,,,, - , ,'i ,, I , " '. ,nim �� , ,m I y, -" � , �, � , n il�,,�' , .KV111,1 i , , M,�, , 11 �p .11P i'�,Z�M1 , ` - , " � , , W M w-n.., - , ,�� ,�, " "I ', �,j, "I" , 0 , � , 1, 1'111 I , :,'�,z'_!�,, �� , 1, ,MR ,,,,�,5,4 , � , ��, 1 IW � 1�P ", I" " ,_ - ,� � ,, , 11,;" 1�, `0 11 I1 I I 'll I", v ""A� 'r NO, �I �A/�� C� , t " , � I ` , , ,, ,$ , ,, , ,, , 11 I �" m"� ,* I�m 1, ,,,O, �&�%�` " ,,:�� � ,"I ,"I'll - ��,,k,6 ,�-�,, �,, , , , , , " P �,I� �I , , � 1, I ,�, ,�_l .I I ,,_�P"I , R 1, ,ml - 11 � , Al'� I , I . - " ,e ", , _ , , , I '®. "' "' ' , Rl��'I� I 11 � -01 , , I It `m u , /�, " , I , , t d"' � � , 4 ,� ," "�,,,,,"��...... , I \'lK �-, ,,�� _ ' , 'ft%ja�,''� �'<'l " ,4,�,,, ,�!,�,, , 'y',��Il 11 , I 1'1��'111_.19,_ &I� " , " "' , , ", "M ml'`�77""" �, � ", 77","' :,., 'M,", ," " , , , ,,,,,' M , , �,, "I ,' ' _," _ , - ....... �I 'MA , , � �z,,�ffi�%, '�� ,�,,��,'�;�"3"- ''� , ,, - , 1! p I ,�l r . " I- A 11 "" , ,I-, , � I �M1,11", ,_ , 77- � , , I If P_�5, _�,11"�,?� k,,I IMN,N ��,,,,�:�_,��:,m... �n',�,,��,g, �, , �',,A qg < "" \& sw , I- , " I � ", I �l 11_;" ��""I I I -I- -- , " '3'q ",� ,, �f _' _xll "I, , _ 1,11, I I ,4 , ,M`�'" ,�`",I "A -� V , , y P V% , 7 ll�. , , , ,"" - I , " � L � , 'MR, """', _ , I , , IF _' , ,, . , ,'' i, " ,, , '"" - ,_ ,, , I- ,�� �, I , -_ -- , I � " " - OT � , ,�', q�', � � , I I 1,11'r ,, ,l ,R�` , A,,-"_,k"��,��,, , , I , "I 1 I'll'-.111; I 1�� ��,`, �� � 1� "'i I�AIR _," - " "�,� , I,,,I_g"� . ""',,',�',�"' ;V��v " ,� '' l, , " TV� " " "' , , - " , � , m"�, W, , " I ,-, ,,,_V'�', "I 1, �,N ,� 11 ,"" 141- -�'r"� I � I _P , �l . ,-'TX-, "",7 , _` -`-,�� � ,,� ""�,,, -,,,,NIflVoMlMR*ll �_ I", �W , , V, � Il,� 1;�,'-�" , , , - �6� lr;ll`Wllll� - , V - x , - ,��"', 4 _ I In nlil k�ll . �" 1�1, - I I , �... , �V , all , , ` " " , � i - i a li� 1� �;r'l, 'Illl , • _- f-, - _A_ " "\r- ,_&_ , � e ,, '�'Q I ." -,"��V-m,- �-, , �' , � ;, mllll�lll - ffi:,S-,gg�'�, "" -4- �,'�,.''I' ,V"�,,,,,�m " -,/�,% .1 - I .1, ,�" ,, �,��',, " , , 4�, � MP,R!'A-N- ,,� ,� , ,;"-",d* ,,,,,M,X; ` - ,-, I ,�r,,,,,�.4 y �', ''I IT'-, <Pe ,t�;,�,ffi'jg, il ;�,, : . , " """ I 1 1, � ��,_," �m F g �, V I�'I, ",, I 4� "", � . , �,�A , - , 14 � �, �gw��q,%� . I I ��Y - , ,11- I W W �ft"I � I �%�W P,,',�`,'l , v , ,6,�, M �111, ��,Wl��M, �I""A.-t2t" � �,,, I, , ", , "" , � - . ,-, �,-" , I 1� ,- �,',SX �,v, ,. - �4,V7� - ,_ I " 'I'll I'S �,-�-'f �l�, ��,',',-1 �'Ij>,'U'3 "',-, I N �_,�'�,"j" , " I I �ft, "I , � 11 * I �,'" I I �_� MC " �N" ,!zw_ "'n��M'.� I" , Q_�'T"'Z%, " , �,_,', ) �,� I , Fgnll'��`?e,,,;�;,�";�`,",',R,k �,,_`,,�'�Mj� � I � . - � �� ��', "/I�P,' "," - � " ' , 11 I I'll N�l " 4i �,,,,e,,`�" ,,� �d, -;,�An, " ea� �,,,,,"; , ,`A,,'�'�n�,R , W- - � I �,�,, "I I IV - I It �" , I a, , m ",", " I , � " _11,1"', ,, I 0_ , , , I ", "I; 11 , I . '" , , .�,,,M� ,� ,- - I " :N-1 lf���"Ill":,: �,'�'A,U'11' ",�1,4,NR'l I',-11," 11 ?�l 1 , ���1.11 , llllql"1�14�1 T*,�,',� " - - -24 -11, I ,� 11' ,,, ,, �� ,/-, �',,.I' R -4 :�l 1,,,,,,e�, I 7, , ,�, ,,v lll"kl� :,Ii,,�� i R 'U. I � I , V ", I ,�1_ g, � I ��I' 'W", � I "" , � ," ,� , I ; , I ,, ,�, ,�� _ �,41�tl'l w-,"', ,Pv ��,' ,� M , � I 11 ,, �e,l, W , I� � I -, " " �"��,M'�,I,g'l,, -, M I , I " ,,� - - , � 1��- "�� ,'' � ,-�,,,,�_% ��,/,"4'�1'40 1111.111�111111 , ,\ � � !�� ,5, 14111�,� AV I I " , " - Z�Yl I,, , I ','t ', , '' I� ", � " f �,%'?�',,Istw, -, " , , _ I' llI'll, II-" � ,,,,, �!� � , 'I K", z��" _ -, ,,�,,, 11I I ', `"I",�, ,_, , ,, ,,_,,,, -11 ' , , , ult,,,", ,�� A�,_<", - V �i ,-;i -, ,,� , , _ .�, �, 2 ,,, .,� , "u ' , , �, I' l, �,:, ' , " 7 ,7,,.', �� �,,-,, ,�� Q V ,� �, ' ",� �717,�7 , " � NN�'pNr 'a"' �,Wl�`Iv, I'll- G ��0" ,,,,n�o,,,, ,m,lc,,,!-.-�-"�,�%�41 a'", &z,,� 1 Is��" " �' i-it',tif,bi"�"ilft ","' � i ,, ,�,,,��`''' J 'ON � Ir 5�, � ,,, ,�'S`,v "''. 6 �� ,�_``'w� ho"" ""*-' e ,,,,, G -S � , ",�� '���"'-�,�,�� 6` iqlll`�l 1-�,�,,�,�,"��\714"1-"-,-,,-"''",- " I2,gj� 1% 'a ,Z �"%N �, �, , , , �, ""',� , " � 7� , ,1� E w"g - � "" � .1 �,� � _j ,R_z�_:, l '� *, - ffi,� , "I'M - �--"�,, :-"�,��,,,,�,,' '����� ��lg,��M ,�,f,,� iff- 'I1, I I A,, -1111, '�,�,I� WSI'�;' � S' e'" ' - "' ' " ,, ' - , I; I1-1 , - ", I 11 ��Il M, , W "I �, , I I "-� `�r K�P ���'' _ � '� lll�ft ' , ,,� ' ,-f 'I �,'��Ca I ,�M�,: " 1 " , 4, , ", � -ll '' ""'',,-" '�,,�' , W16" m- a", _� , ,_ ,, ',Vm�� , , �lW 1 ,, ,; ' 11" I _ ,F I&, _ - 141,�',P , ,"'"F, "I �4 ,�Il ,;,�, R � ,,7 _7 \2 � M, , z ,� .f , - i _q* _ 5115 " / "',��5�0r ,: R I U17,K:,�/ " �,,, r , " 1",f,�y, ," _� ,,,, Nlx%km�" NO_ . I I I ll,�Il , I IF, I ll� �l ', "/ A 1. 11 lll�, " l_;,l'/l_ -0, . - '�7:M' ,��!!� `amlt'l,I'l�,l,ll 11 -P ; �_:,' ?V� ... 1 , ,�/-"� � llllll� I , ,_ / , �Nllol,�W'�, I 'I., ;"","",��,�)-,,�-�-,�,'-��',,',',�,,,�,���-1:�,,�,� I ,�"J,,,,, ��," '5�' ,,,�-,>, -Z,,'�,'�,&Ij��_I,v,,; -, ',A�,A, , - �,,,�_J " "' , ",� , I IFI, , � ,, ,D�1111'111 li � I'm,� ", I - , ,��, " I � , I "" " "e 009? _,:��, ,�_�,,M�]�'fflg'%V, ,, ll�:)"�,Ii�l/""ul�11`11111 I " - J! 4�,,_ - ,� ,, '��,�",,, ���I �za, : - ""' , , ,,* - , , _ � 11,,,, �, � , _ - ,,- " `I -1 r_11-I— 1. ��,�N�' 'k�", � I v 1�"'Itrl*�";`,'� ,��1'.ul) � Ylvki �i , . " �, "',-, �,;,�'�:"`,�,!� �,�, ,\,�,,,, "I�ll "',""��"/ ,,��', ,�, , , , , 1, , �1� , "f; . , ,,'���' -" , & � � \.� � '1111 -,A,M;��`/��-,�",-�,:,�,, ,,,-,,,- � ��/ , - mr�` '_ , '1�,C, J' -y," ". "'," "'! k " " 't V_��'.,�,'�,'-,� -1 11-1 d bl ",., �""e,,��_�,;��: "]�,,,�� A �\" , �",� !, E,� ,1`,�.,, '��,�,�' , ', :,� 1� � W -� ,,��,, , ,Q M - _, �,,,r�,I , ,-/,1; �,:" ,�w�,,', ,` - �,,, U I I , � , , , " . ,�-� -� mg ,� 111,11, I ,, ,, I - 11 � I I TD., �mg� ; ,1 � , ll',�M� I� , " � I �l - _ .air I � ,-"t,�qI41 , I, ., ,� ,,�,, -%'p--- � � 11 !",-'"�,�,'�,�'��',-�,, ir - 1 ,. 1 -, V , "�, 1�,,F 11 21.111 I— , 5 Ap,,`,� ��' v Ak I , I ", - � I'sft � ,� _1 , " , , , , - I I I I I � � 'T� , I ,`?�, � - � -" a 490 ,,",,,�,,,,"",""�/�l," �, , ,",,,, -1,1111" 11,_1 �"111"I� ', _1,4111, � g�A, : ,7,,,�V� im � " ,_ ,, I , ,,, I , ��i 11 "%1�4 - , n" ,��, I - "I, ',�"", , -1 -11 , , , - �i,;, 'l I,- "', � � ___ ,"_ "" �� 1- �,l , " ',��,," , 0 , �, _,M, r " m�,,,A �, , 1, N" M ", "I M 11 WIN '�A,MNIMIM, '�,,,' ',`,�'-�,M'T� 1-11 , � 'PMEI�'Illl � , I A -, I ',� ," "", ,� �,,<, AM. "j,- , , , " � � ,� __��, ,f ,,, � 1� _," , " , �, " � ", �Nlll"',: ,� `,�t� " I I , ,. - 11� , n__ "", �� MO ,,,,,,, 'o"I" - , , , , "" , /I , I 41 lkl,Xll�I I I % �l 11 � " 1-11, I & "�11�,��, , ,�,"',-,,�� I- �-��,W,".g -111, I I "Cix", � -�", I N� /,�Z�_,,- -, v �"a_� _��2 m "'�-, -, ", M, � 'g -, , � , OR W" � a ,;" �,F,�', Ml,': �,,� , R '� �I -�, w � ,�,, """ ,� ,`� ,�,, ,'�, 1111WIIIIIIIIII " '' ,,, , " , r?I 11 ,11111111 .1, , "- , „a, ", ,17�1) .-g _ 4- ,�,,� ,�- ,,,,Z�, �,�,M��, � ,,, I - ,�,�� �l ', I ll�lwl I �__ ",� � -� "M -, -- ��`l���I��, %��,"1�4"",,, -,� J �,,�,Z��,I,� ,I�c , , ,"� ,�j,,��J�� �, fty , , , I lll�.Il 11"11 - . I ,"I',,1��,�, , % ,� ,-", ,,,,�`, _ ,__ -Iv-, ,,��,"�', . � - I ,,�,,� � m I kl_jH,11�1�,,"_,�. ,` �, , c , , " I I 11 1,14�,� ", ,, �, -,... �, .1, , � �gg, " ,,,- ,I'll, �"�W , o -g,"�,�,,_�,,��,"g,"'j,":",Qk"rh,k��_Y ,� - ''I ''I I, -,,I � , ��, _ - I , P, , , , �, "- I - � , , ,"I" - "' , _�, ,M � ,,,,,,, ?1�1,1� ,� 1, :��� �,, ", I ,"\ , ,,,,," __-",wl, ...... . ��R" � �, " � I , " �' - � , 11 �'IN&' A 2,� `� -�, --,�',�, , I-II/I'll, ,�, I- , , ,, , �I�Illkl�l I", I I—, , ��_ , ,,F:t','\' "i "" � , '_ 4 N "� -,,,'.,,�,,�', �,,�,& ,.��,,"� ,,,,,,_:�,"�,,, ", M,,u�,,p , ,�h�_5"� �l "I I � , _ , ��I."' �_ I " , - ,�;�401,7'1 ",'_,,�,�_ - ",� , � ', ,�/,, �"', , I ��,,,�,�%,,- , ",��N'c","',�,"Pj,-,-�""�,gwr - " i�, , �> ''I'll, � � 11," ", I ." .1 , I MV,tv, - , - �,��, , E ,,��,w < , ,,,,�I� ,,�,,,� - ,�, .� * /"�, ,""",."�-;�q�' " r"t ,- ,� f', "�- "�1, ,6 , , g /,.� - . ']�, 04 " ,� ` I;- -", , -1,1111 ��,- �ft I "',I I ig, ,�,, , I 4""" ?,, , "IM-1111 � ;� , ,, � I 3, �11 A0� v "� , _- , , , , � ,�,_��,z, � , ��T ,J,', �,,�,�_t�4,,,,,,�_.' , " ,�� 'I" , " _,"" "'" , �, - I 'h�',��,�'�'?� " , , , � � ,.Ill� I Q :��,-:" - �"`�,,, , , � , � , , - a - ,�,, - , �-j� mr-': -�,,,, � W_,,--,,I,�a,�P, _ �, , ,�� _'��,� ,_ ��- , �, :�ii�_,��,,,, ,�.�,, I')�;,�_"�'f,,,�<,',)_ �I ,"';, " ,"'M -,%, - �', , " , .,� 4 11, � ,,� I-, " , , " ,,," & iww"', ��_, ,'?W'\§'g-__]._' � m�,�, ,� p� -M`V� "n " t��'�I_ _'.'��,� , g I , I �Wl 't _�1`111111 ����"�4,-;,,��,7,, �,,� , ""R I IM , gggj��.,,-,-,,,- ,7'�-� ,- � , ,", I ,R I , � , Z I I I" - --- a , ��a ` ,a, I I --�!,� ,� , �''�i,41N`b D-NV,',,,,�,,w`�,�,- , � � - ,"�,�V�'��......�'��,'� 'I/ ,,,,�,,�,�:, , INI , "� , , I � ,,� i , ,� � N""A " � , � �A m _ ,,, I 1, " & "il� '�l , .,"",_� , 11 ,� , ` ,, -��,�.Q, �.���:.�..;.�-.�".',,.,,.�.���"-;,?4,Lk,\,��l,-�,�,�-�,� _," ,_ I A I'll I - `V`Nlffv_��Xl.... .� � _1 , �. t�v; ",I-e-,I 1'�'l I ll� " I 1-�, _� ", 7 1�W 'r,��,� , , ,��M!,�N`o�,,,,�-,,�,�",_,�,"�,�. ,,,,, �� ,��_ , , ��,�`, 11,.��...�-��:_.',..,!,-���,-�------L,�� _T, ��_\ '. .4 ZM,'P,F�� , - , � �. ''" " " __ � 11� " , � , , , , -��'_`,;, � - I l,:�140"If" 1;-, ," '�',,'�' -,r,-g,,,-,,,,,,-..�,11,����,���f". ,,,,�,�,,, �,, , ,�, - I " IN,I,,, `��,��,5 I-- I I I _,,�,,,,,�,,',��';� ""', " -,,-, / , � I'll, "I ,��, " � " `-1 'N , ,,�.,; -_ 1�'l - �" ," ,, 11 11 , , I I ��� " , ,�� "11 - 1�11 , , , � � , - , � d I � , " ''; ,.� I 11_� � ." �,,� , �,urt " -a'', " � , 1:""!,,�,�� I ,",-11 I I " "%'lr,%';4lw7,";" ,'"' ;,� o "';, , " - 1,, I "- " y"- , , `�, " , "�, : ,�l �I-I-�11-`I",� I , ,,,,,,, � �� , ,�_ ,� ,,� __,U.,- , � I -........�'104km.11, :��Illllk I_�_�l��, - - �� . � _ I ...�l �11 I 4/16/2012 Comments on FSEIR 07-002 Based on WEIR 99-1 BAR4,pg 10-66,FSEIR 07-002:proposed to use FMEIR 99-1 grassland mitigation areas FMEIR 99-1 assigned all grasslands mitigation acreage in Project/Program areas in 1999 Before Senior Center construction MM 4.3-2 needs 5 acres: Purchase and enhance private property to provide new mitigation area 3.5 acres encyclopedia lots and small pump lease area 4.0 acres Brindle/rhomas lease Remove overflow parking for Equestrian Center(55 utility posts) 2.9 acres next to southeast corner of Center Suggested corrections to MM 4.3-2 and pgs 4.3-22 and 4.3-23;identified errors in Table 3.7-3 CLG-20,pg10-57,FSEIR 07-002: proposed fig 3.9,pg 3-21 as Central Park land use plan Fig 3.9(fig 1.0-4, FMEIR 99-1)substantially out of date(1997-1998) and never corrected to reflect FMEIR 99-1 changes to Plan specified in 1999 Suggested corrections to figure 3.9 and identified factually incorrect words on fig 3.9 Natural Pa*.ppt,1/17/12 41.2 Acres Non-Native Grass Area Required Midden Area/Urban Forest/Trail head (26 acres) Semi-active Recreation Area (1.6 acres) Sully Miller Lake Group Area (5.8 Acres) Low Intensity Recreation Area (7.8 Acres) (41.2 Acres) FMEIR 99-1 Mitigation Plan defines non-native grass and Urban Forest area to replace acres taken by ball fields. Final result might look like the 1981 picture to the right,with 4i interspersed Urban Forest trees. This natural park area is heavilyused by equestrians,bicyclists, Orc,1981 from EI8 81-5 hikers and other park goers. Natural Park.ppt,1117112 1 4/16/2012 Non-native Grasslands Identified in FMEIR 99-1 Aerial Photo,Lune 1994;Table 3.7-3 t.for .. 4 a� a L .r Y L Natural Park.ppl,1/17I12 MM 4.3-2 Requires 5 Acres Non-native Grassland One-half a Quarter section is 80 Acres Equestrian Center 25.0 acres BrindlelThomas 3.8 acres Encyclopedia lots and small oil lease 3.5 acres Midden Area/Urban Forestfrrailhead 43.2 acres Semi-active Recreation Non-native grassland 1.6 acres Developed(Equestrian Center parking) 2.9 acres Total 80.0 acres Natural Parl ppt,1/17/12 2 4/16/2012 Specifications from Table 3.7-3 Of FMEIR 99-1 Non-Native Developed Landscaped Lake Total Grassland Land Water FMEIR 99-1 Area Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Low-intensity 19.2 7:8 0.0 11.4 0.0 Midden 26.0 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Semi-active* 8.0• 1.6 5.1• 1.9 0.0 corrected 4.5• 1.6 2.9• 0.0 Sully Miller** 19.2 5.8 4.8" 8.6•• 0.0 corrected' 19.2 5.8 0.0•' 2.4" 11.0 41.2 acres non-native grassland required Neglected to account for private/lease property in Midden Area: Encyclopedia lots-oil lease=3.5 acres Neglected to account for Sully Miller Lake 11 acres water area: Retain"11.7 disturbed reparian areas 1'8+vertical acres')"and delete"landscaped"area to support small birds:endangered,state-listed and sensitive NaturalPark.ppt,1117/12 Sully Miller Lake Group Facility from FMEIR 99-1 Google Maps,171an2012 r Lake Banks 80-120 feet high Trees slide/fall into water 8.6"vertical acres" disturbed reparian? LA . Natural Pa B.ppl.1/1]/12 3 4/16/2012 FMEIR 99-1 Central Park Land Use Plan- Natural Park Aerial Photo 3/1/2009,pgs 3.7-44 and 3.7-45, Final Master Environmental Impact Report 99-1 an ase Natural Pam.ppt,1117112 Comments on FSEIR 07-002 Based on FMEIR 99-1 BAR-2, pg 10-66,FSEIR 07-002:proposed to use FMEIR 99-1 grassland mitigation areas FMEIR 99-1 assigned all grasslands mitigation acreage in Project/Program areas in 1999 Before Senior Center construction MM 4.3-2 needs 5 new acres, leaving 2.8 acres: Purchase and enhance private property to provide new mitigation area 3.6 acres encyclopedia lots and small pump lease area 4.0 acres Brindle/Thomas lease Remove overflow parking for Equestrian Center(55 utility posts) 2.9 acres next to southeast corner of Center Suggested corrections to MM 4.3-2 and pgs 4.3-22 and 4.3-23: identified errors in Table 3.7-3 CLG-20,pg1057,FSEIR 07-002: proposed fig 3.9,pg 3-21 as Central Park land use plan Fig 3.9(fig 1.04, FMEIR 99-1)substantially out of date(1997-1998) and never corrected to reflect FMEIR 99-1 changes to Plan specified in 1999 Suggested corrections to figure 3.9 and identified factually incorrect words on fig 3.9 NaWral Park.ppt,1117/12 4 4/16/2012 Result of City Mitigation Efforts in FMEIR 99-1 Aerial Photo 3/1/2008 �I II•Tl � �allr r a� ' f C_ I J.r_. iY 3sl r c Natural Park.ppt.VI7112 FMEIR 99-1 Noted Errors in Fig 3-9 of FSEIR 07-002 Incorrect descriptions from FMEIR 99-1 - """aC 7.8 acres non-native grass 11.4 acres landscaped ";7""•°` -' r>^^ FMEIR 99-1 specifies a natural park without development �"" en1NYhnrie°' i Incorrect Equestrian Center boundaries ^ %� Incovectfacilities description — �t 7ailhead planned on top of CDFG stn am _ ..� •• Mislabelingof Semiactive Recreationlocation t ..:.:^••••• FMEIR 99.1 Private property rights ignored \ i — „ •11.7 acres Petroleum leases - t ___� disturber, I.. Encyclopedialots ••�� �" I reparian' Improper reference date \ - 5.8 ac non-native !['. for figure application :_ grasses ake Not the subject of FSEIR 07-002 Not specified in FMEIR 99-1 tlEbelpped Different figure on ry 11 T" p,,,," a _ Community Services website - wa^k�•'^•'•'•-^^^ Requires Charter Section 612 vote Natural Park.rpt.1117112 5 4/16/2012 Please Take the Time to do FSEIR 07-002 Correctly and Avoid Future Controversy Appendix 6 4/16/2012 WEIR 99-1 Carefully Defined Natural Park Lands pg 3.7-43,FMEIR 99-1 iwrncrs TO sasnrvc swot cwwumnu uox wsr®rux wrmvrnsrvn nurvnrvcrox arrtws rsn rm or xurvnrvcran suw "English Park" D34°' us 94.1 acres Natural Park °;' .,,;, 1 Heavily manicured aai.i• 17.2 acres .:.:m,n and landscaped ll um°,r,., r° r°. - ar Picnic areas Urban Forest r .»:ur,�• Play areas 41.2 acres l °+ m nm -fix+ Paved paths Non-native grasslands r aar Midden Areas "'ro Low Intensity recreation Semi-active recreation Sully Miller wnbinin9 uu Multiuse trails w; Raptors and other conserved wildlife Enhancements, no development Natural Park.ppt,1117/12 7 SUPPLEMENTAL Jennifer Villasenor, Senior Planner COMMUNICATION City of Huntington Beach Planning Department b 2000 Main Street, Third Floor R eOng Date; Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Agenda Item No. Subject: Comments on SEIR 07-002, Material to be presented on 4-16-2012 to City Council The City Council will be unable to make the correct land use findings due to what seems to be factual errors and conceptual misunderstandings of the City's prior approvals. Since many of these issues arose after the comment period for the Senior Center EIR, I would hope that the City would take the time to correct the record. An approval on this record would not only be illegal, but could jeopardize other projects and improvements in Central Park. (Attached are the slides I presented to the Planning Commission for reference.) Here are the issues: Staff briefing by Jennifer Villasenor(15 charts): Chart 3: the record is contradictory on the project size. The project size is not 45000 sq-ft; that is the size of the building footprint only. We are discussing a project nearly 10 times in size at 392000 sq-ft(9 acres), plus another 45000 sq-ft for the TRC not authorized by Measure T. Chart 6: The present mitigation plan on biological issues is not feasible and opens the door for challenge without some documents from the Planning Department showing they honored their FMEIR 99-1 mitigation commitments over the last 12 years. Do such documents exist for public review? Chart 8: The"Central Park Master Plan" is a totally incorrect depiction of Central Park as described in FMEIR 99- 1 and needs to be corrected as noted in previous public comments. To allow the incorrect portrayal of the park and its long term/permanent development restrictions could be interpreted as an attempt to circumvent City Charter Section 612. Chart 9: This is an incorrect plat representation of the project. The plat map should show a 9 acre project area, not a 5 acre area. The 5 acre plat map is missing 4 additional acres of driveway entrance and supplemental landscaping around the 5 acres. Chart 13: Staff needs to re-read the letters from the US Interior Department Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) and from the CA Dept of Fish and Game(CDFG) in Section 12 of FMEIR 99-1. The City's response to meet Service and CDFG comments are also found in sections 12 and 13. The ball parks would not have been built without a commitment to biological mitigation within the Low Intensity, Sully-Miller, Midden/Urban Forest and Semi-Active Areas for raptor foraging. The biological mitigation the City committed to provide in FMEIR 99-1 was an acknowledgement by the City that the Service and CDFG were correct in stating there was severe destruction of 68 acres of raptor forage and other habitat by the ball parks and"amenities" of the Sports Center. Chart 15: The Equestrian Center land survey may make the SEIR 07-002 for the Senior Center incomplete. The land survey shows that in order for the City to perform the Senior Center biological mitigation, private property and leases in the 1/8 section containing the Equestrian Centermay need to be purchased. No plan is presented in SEIR 07-002 that indicates where the funds are reserved within the City budget. No plan is mentioned to condemn the properties in an area already over-committed to a biological mitigation plan under FMEIR 99-1. Is the staff proposing to remove 7.8 acres from the Equestrian Center lease for the purpose of biological mitigation for the Senior Center?As noted in a letter from US District Attorney Patterson referenced in FMEIR 99-1 Section 12, biological mitigation plans had to be believably stated before the Service or CDFG could approve plans for the construction of the Sports Complex. To City Council.- Staff may have become confusetl over the years promoting this development project. The Council needs to prdtect the other users of the park the voters and property owners of Huntington Beach from possible multi-cause legal actions and challenges;`while addressing senior issues via a more focused plan with fewer moving parts. Letter to Council by Scott Hess(13 pages): Page 1: How can a 30-40 ft building be 1 story tall"?This is misleading for the Council's understanding of the drawings of the Senior Center. Page 2-3: The Senior Center project is unfunded and could obligate the City to a large expenditure in the future if approved by Council. SEIR 07-002 seems incomplete. Page 3: SEIR 07-002 describes a project 10 times larger than stated here, more like 437000 sq-ft than 45000 sq- ft. Page 4: The Central Park Master Plan proposed was created in 1997-1998 and does not reflect the changes required in FMEIR 99-1 that Council voted to accept in August 1999 to satisfy US Department of Interior and CA Fish and Game concerns. Does Council really want to inject the TRC into this decision when it was not approved in Measure T? The project description becomes unstable because it now includes new elements such as the TRC the voters did not approve in 2006. Page 5: The hours of operation should not exceed normal park hours. Allowing operation to midnight on Fridays and Saturdays is unnecessary and contemptible to neighbors and park users. Page 6: The City's recognition of the radical change in the low intensity area's usage from "passive"to"active" and the described Senior Center"business"activity reinforces the need to replace the entire 7.8 acre raptor foraging area being taken in the Low Intensity Area with some new land in a biologically suitable location. Page 73he letter fails to read plat maps and calculate simple percentages:(9acres/1 4 acres)xl00=64%! The impact on the local area is not"less than 1 OW but 64% if you count the entire project including parking, driveways and supplemental landscaping. Page 7: Here the letter tells the Council that a 9 acre landscaped strip-mall-like building has no biological impact on the local area. Has staff done any observation and studies to show that this is true anywhere else in the City or anywherefor a 9 acre strip-mall-like building? Has a credentialed biologist approved this statement?The biologist's approval and the observation data are not in the documents staff provided the public and Council. Page 7:A mitigation list is worthless when the staffs performance in mitigation activities on FMEIR 99-1 and other past EIR's seem to lack documentation. Has anyone in the Council seen a Biological Mitigation Monitoring report from staff showing that a plan a Council approved is being followed? Page 10: This interpretation of the FMIR 99-1 sounds like the version without Sectionsl2 and 13. In Sections 12 and 13 the staff recognized and modified DEIR 99-1 to meet the US Interior Dept and CA Fish and Game Department concerns before the City Council would approve FMEIR 99-1 in August 1999. The mitigation of the Midden/Urban Forest, Low-intensity Area, Sully-Miller Area and Semi-Active Area for non-native grassland and urban Forest are clearly stated in FMEIR 99-1 on modified pages 12-15, 3.7-43, II-17, 3.7-44, 3.7-45 and 3.7-46. The statements in the letter are in direct conflict with FMEIR 99-1, the Master Environmental Impact Report for this area of Central Park. For instance, the staff forgot to include the 26 acre midden area of non-native grasses noted in FMEIR 99-1. Note the staff again considers Talbert Lake Meadow as non-native grassland (which is under water when raptors are present!). The Service and CDFG specifically pointed out the error to staff in 1999 and requested the map used by staff be redrawn correctly for the Talbert Lake area. Page 11: The staff states the Sports Complex was not considered raptor foraging habitat in 1999. It is as if the staff did not read the Master FMEIR 99-1 before planning and writing SEIR 07-002. Please refer to page 12-15 in FMEIR 99-1, where staff and the City acknowledge that the ball parks did take 42 acres of ruderal vegetation foraging areas for raptors and other species. Also please refer to Section 4.3-2, pages 4.3-21, 22 and 23 in DEIR 07-002 where the biology expert hired by the staff explicitly states ruderal habitat supports raptor foraging and thus its destruction by the proposed 5 acre[really 9 acre] Senior Center needs to be mitigated. By what logic can staff contradict its and City Council's observation in 1999 and also ignore the 2007 pronouncements of its staff- selected biology expert? Also please recognize that the Sports Complex took more than 42 acres for the ball fields; "parking and other amenities," destroyed an additional 30 acres approximately of ruderal foraging and trees which were only partially mitigated in FMEIR 99-1 (see letters from Service and CDFG noted previously and scaled area from fig 8 in attach A of Section 13 of FMER 99-1). Page 11: The Equestrian Center boundaries were clearly shown and stated in the original 1982 lease to Milligan. The City initially recognized the US National Public Land Survey boundaries on the 10 acre stable property purchased by the City in 1974 from Curtis/Clark/et al. I believe this 10 acre stable was operated by the City until 1982 when the original stable was leased to Ed Milligan of Better Built Enterprises to operate and improve with 15 acres of land between the east side of the City's stable and the centerline on Golden West Street. The recent new "usage boundary"survey for the Equestrian Center establishing its"correct 1982 lease boundary"show its current boundary probably enclosed private property in the western boundary area. If the usage survey of the lease area is correct, the City and/or its lessee could owe a substantial sum of money to the property owners dating back to 1974, which could also include penalties for illegal land seizure by the City and/or the lessee. This information on private property ownership dates to July 2011 property tax records held by the County of Orange. If the City and/or lessee purchased this private property for the Equestrian Center since then, they may only owe rent and penalties from 1974 to 2011 to the original private owners. To sum up: SEIR 07-002 is no longer factually supported in the letter. In fact, the letter incorrectly states facts and, ignores other parts of the public record. In fact, it ignores common sense. Staff seems to be intent on forcing an unfunded hodgepodge EIR and planning document into a legal environment which will be hostile to the City's objectives for seniors. The letter shows staff has little understanding of past planning decisions in FMEIR 99-1, approved by public comment and votes and Council actions. Recommend disapproval of the proposed SEIR 07- 002 and associated documents. Sincerely, /s/ Bob Schwanz I I I Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline [noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:49 AM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10957 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council -Agenda& Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: Bill Morris Description: As a 37 year resident of Huntington Beach and a senior citizen, I am asking you to vote in favor of the EIR for the new senior center. Seniors need to be put before birds. Birds will always be there and this building will not cause them to go to other places. Thank you for your time. Bill Morris bmorrisksocal.rr.com Expected Close Date: 04/17/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. SUPPLEMENTAL COMMUNICATION ft eOng Dater Agenda Item No. l i Esparza, Patty From: Surf City Pipeline[noreply@user.govoutreach.com] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:50 AM To: CITY COUNCIL; agendaalerts@surfcity-hb.org Subject: Surf City Pipeline: Comment on an Agenda Item (notification) Request# 10958 from the Government Outreach System has been assigned to Johanna Stephenson. Request type: Comment Request area: City Council - Agenda& Public Hearing Comments Citizen name: John Miles Description: From: J D Miles [mailto.jdmiles@socal.rr.com] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:07 AM To: Shaw, Joe Cc: Stephenson, Johanna Subject: EIR FOR THE NEW SENIOR CENTER Dear Council Member, Please vote to pass the EIR for the new Senior Center at tonight's council meeting. John Miles 19316 Wingedfoot Huntington Beach Expected Close Date: 04/17/2012 Click here to access the request Note: This message is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email. Email replies are not monitored and will be ignored. StJfF,,LEMENTAL COMMUNICATION k4e*V Nate:-- Aprds ice► No.� �� RECEIVED FROM AS PUBLIC REC D C IL MEET16 April 2012 OF E KDear Mayor & City Council. �oAN L. YCITY CLERK I have looked at the 2010 census data for HB and I think you will find this interesting. Also on back is`County information showing HB is growing in 60+ population faster the balance of the county! Huntington each pop compare 2000 Increase Increase census 2010 census # Total HB 189,59 POP 4 189,992 398 0.2% 60+ HB 27,6 POP 23 38,504 10881 39.4% 60+ as pct: 14.6% 20.3% Median age 36 40.2 The top line (total pop) shows the total HB population in 2000 and 2010, with the increase by numbers--and percentage. You will 'see:-that'the population increased by 398, a percentag-,of 0.2%; The second line (60+) shows the HR age-60+ population in 2000 and 2010, with increase by numbers and percentage. You will see that the 60+ population has increased by 10,881, a 39.4% increase. Whereas the 60+ population in 2000 constituted 14.6% of the total HB population, in 2010 they are 20.3%o of the population. The median age of HB was 36 in 2000; it was ,40.2 in 2010. HB is aging- Wake up and smell the coffee, people and they vote! Whereas the population of the city is far less than the overall 5.8% of growth experienced by the county as a whole, the whopping 39.4% growth in the HB 60+ population outstripped the 32%•growth of the' . county 60+ population. I hope this will be helpful! Don MacAllister donmacalhster@g-mail.com Population Trend of Older Adults: California and Orange County Whereas the population of Orange County as a whole increased by 5.8 percent between 2000 and 2010, the 60+ population increased by 32 percent, compared to 23 percent between 1990 and 2000.The population of California increased 10 percent between 2000 and 2010, while the 60+ population in the State increased 28.2%, compared to 12 percent between 1990 and 2000. The chart below provides a visual illustration of this. Comparison of Rate of Increase on Total Population and Older Adults 60 Yrs and Older between 2000 and 2010 U.S.,CaKoreis and Orange County 35% 25% 0% _ !%OiowIhADY�+ 5% q .• 0% l us. + orw4ecojro Total Population and Number of Older Adults 60 years old and older 2000 2010 %Growth Growth Total Total Po ulation 60 rs+ Total Population 60 s+ Population' 60 yrt+ U.S. 281,421,906 45 797,200 308,745,538 57,085.908 9.7% 24.6% Califomia 33,871,648 4,742 499 37,253,956 6,078,711 10.0% 28.2% Orange County 2,846,289 1 377,185 3,010,232 496,404 5.8% 32% Source: U.S. Census Bureau Older Adults in Orange County The older adult population in Orange County is diverse in number within racial/ethnic groups. Older adults age 60+ comprise only 6.9,percent of the Hispanic population in Orange County, compared to older adults comprising 16.1 percent of the Asian/Pacific Islander population and 24.6 percent of the White population. TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: 0 I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER 0 I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 0 I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE 0 ., --DATE J d TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE �l _ /� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE 7 l/'Qx_ TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITE' COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER 1-✓I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH { r / SIGNATURE DATE ���'l TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ®� SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER o'-,A SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) `-.�I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SI GNATURE C'4 V' DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE %, DATE `'1/6 d%/a TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE % G TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL. MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) e I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE ✓ DATE TO ALL OF THE H NTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL: MEMBERS I AN4 A P-LI SIDFNT OF THE CTTY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ( SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPOPI- THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE; CI'VIZENS OF HLTNTINGTON BEACH ,. (T DATE SIGNATURE Gar' � �� TO ALL OF 'TILE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL. MEMBERS LAM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER yc I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE__GtG' _DATE I2 /2 TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL TIEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: i SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ZI SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) -,/'I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURL mil!' �G�M o C��-9 DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CTTY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE �:�. nj::� > "� ;cam%`a-�' '-����<� DATE 4z_ TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER l I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE ' - .. -- --DATE TO .ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I .AIM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- NIENTS: • 1 SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • 1 SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CTTIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE SIGNATURE [�� 1 TO ALL OF THE HUN'TINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTLNGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT .A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) E I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWES'T AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON (BEACH CITE' COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE SIGNATURE �I TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: +' I,SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ®' I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) o/ I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH f. SIGNATURE_ DATE JY /3 /r TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE _ __ _DATE 7 3�� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE �� DATE 'TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A. SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGMA"LURE-- --( -�-- DATE_��. TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: V I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER l:� I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) •� I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH r y SIGNATURE, _ tDATE -- ✓ TO ALL, OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE t DATE C �- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) © I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE ( LAC I �- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATUREA It -- - DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUN'TINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: O I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER O I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE ___ DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE �� I c--- C DATE ( ' TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATU _ - DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) O I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATU DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) Y I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE t-/ TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) O I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE -f -�� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE_ f � TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATU �a -�& �- '� DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNI'INGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNAT DATE l TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH f V SIGNATURE r DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE ' C '!2- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) O I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Imo, SIGNATURE c (Gfi. DATE 411160 TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE Ae:;7 ��� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) o I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE KQuAw DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE J �-CJ� DATE ��e �oL- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: o I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) O I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATU ,z��L __ _ C�U�_DATEA��11 / TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE 1.:. Uk)-- DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) o I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 19 SIGNATURE � DATE v TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ��• I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER i I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) O I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE :`1 DATE �G "� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) O I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH s SIGNATURE �,�" DATE - � TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL. MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER GI SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE � � DATE d/2- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENVOFH TINGTON BEAT SIGNATURE DATE �� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: C I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) G I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE— MENTS: O I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) C I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE a ,,lLl ,l ��� � CL.' l ATE �� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: © I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER © I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE a p d TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) O I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE SIGNATURE �� - � - TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE t DATE / TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE ��� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: Y I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE �p of TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITE' COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE O.vv�- �� ��� DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE/4 TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: 9 I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATU Y'z,rcS Yt DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: V I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER (y I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE W DATE Z TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER C� I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) C�A I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATU 2 � DATE RE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITE'COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER © I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE ' DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) D fI SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE 'CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE `�J DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE - DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATUR �� 1 -° DATE / TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER i I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE ��`- DATE --�6-/� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE �� � DATE /� / TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: O I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER o I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATU DATE / TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER O I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE C DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: 0 I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) 0 I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE OZi /, TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: 0 I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE ��l--J )ATE_ TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: e• I PPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I_SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DATE SIGNATURE 2 � � j TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE �`d� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: S I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE -- '-��' _, TO ALL OF THE IHUN-TINTFT CAN BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTONT BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: s I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER a I SUPPORT TI-IE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE Cf l`I7_TNS OF HIJNTINGTOi,,1 BEACH S JNAT:1 - - --C===- - --------DATF —-,, � TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: 0 I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) O I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDF,NWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE, DATE /� �� � 6 TO ALL OF THE HUNTING TON BEACH CITY COUNCYT, MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF H?INTINGTON BEACH 1, (f-, SIGNATUREa& DATE � �.� a G U TO ALI. OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH Cl I Y COUNCIL, MEMBERS I A`vl A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: 0 I: SIJIPPORT A NEW SENIOR.CENTER m I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) w I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND fALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE. CITIZENS OF HUNTiNGTON E CH SIGNATURE- -- - - __ -- -- _-- DATE - �� � 0C;G: 77) TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITE' COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) n I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE CI DENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH r4 hh SIGNATURE DATE oC� �-� -- -- _ 1 �a/ TO ALL OF THE liUNTINGTON BEACH CI¢I'y COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH J��?(24�,u Chit SIGNATURE D ATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE. MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) O I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE ��� TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITE" OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE, MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER / • I SUPPORT THE ENTVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR. CENTER AT THE GOLD WEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ✓✓ SIGNATURE 'jV6j f� __ _ DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAN AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENW ' D TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE 4f - !6 - ! z TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE. MENTS: ® UPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • ��TTAL IMPACT R�nnR��g,.) CUPPORT A'SENIOR CENTER AT.THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE ITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SI U _ DATE 7' TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) o I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATU DATE Xv/ '/�i TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER - • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BE SIGNATURE DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH f SIGNATURE - DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AMA RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUN'TINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE �- TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 4 Lf�e '� SIGNA JK, DATE i TO ALI, OF THE HUNI'INGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF NUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLI_-OWING STATE- MENTS: a I STJPPORT ,NEW SENIOR CENTER a I SUPPORT I'tIE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBE.RT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Z , SIGNATURE _ DATE ) Z TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER o I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE _ is = DATE Z TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL IMETNI iERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATF- 1VIE;NTS: 0 I SUPPORT ANEW SENIOR CENTER O 1 SUPPORT T11:E ENVIRONMENTAL INlP/ CT REPORT ;E1R? e I SUPPORT A, SENIOR (-'.ENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AN.D TALBERi,I,OCA tfI0N1 VOTED 01_�_IIY THE C'ITIIBN; OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ¢ - 7, /Z SIGNATURE-�� � ,✓ 6L�� -- ------.DATE------- TO ALL CD.N' I IIE HUNT NGT ON BEACH CITY COUNCIL ?VII+,TNIBER.S I AM A RESi1�E:\;_l, OF "'14 CI"I `z'�)E }i� T�1TfN.rTC)N RF,'�C°Ii A.1tiTli [ ..vt ?.ET? V�'ITiI "THt, l C?L:.,C1��VjNG S aT - �Ir-P` I S. 03 SUPl ORT '� : � ^�'I(IiZ t �N'f-R ," f ;HE GOLDEN, E T ,A''v:7 T:hI_,Ri:,I�'i' T,t:3�'.A�'IGi`i V014:.I:} ON BY '11-11" {:I"1 1�T.r,-�li�a�r1 )N ICE C'ci nn TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) ® I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON THE IZ N F HUN GTON BEACH SIGNATU DATE TO ALt, O F THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AVI A RESIDENT OF THE CI`fY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITIi THE FOLLOWING STATE- M, ENT S: I SUPPORI A NEW SENIOR CENTER A I ST.I PORT 'lTlE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (F!R) I SUPPORT A SENL IOR CEN-TER AT TI-IE GO(DL'N`NEST AN!D O'ALIBER-f L OC:AT7ONr VOTI I) ON `r3Y l ITI: Cl tZENS OF HL L 'F NC T0N BEACII SIGNATURE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL, MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE. CITY OF ILIUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MI?NTS SliPPOR'T A NE & SENIOR CENTI EP, I S?PPORT THE ENVIRON'tvIE'N T AL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) I SUPPORT A SENIOR 1_Eirv'IFER AT THE GOLI)EN`VES"[' /\:NJ? "i'AI,BER1' LOCATIONT VOTED ONE BY THE (;IT.E:NS OF HL ^II'INGTON BEAC �,A� / 2-SIGNATURE � " �`"ec'�-_ -DATE TO ALL 0 ➢'HE HI.TNTIN TCI N REACH CITY COUNCIL N"l l',TNIBERS, I AMA RE:SIDPNT OF TLI,: CITY OF IJUNT NGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- I SI Tl'c t rl2_ A NF,,W SE�IIOR ('L;N'TER ! SUi' THE I NIVIROl-MIL;'TAi: MPACT R,P-POR i (UR) 4 I S `PI'OW. A SENIOR Cl,,N FFR AZ THE GOL,.DENW)-.S t AND Y Al.Ils,� t.t CIA T'On, V()l Pf) Cw,7 3Y UHT; „`.TIZENS OF HUN lINGTO'N BEACH - A:- -- SIGNA"CURE---- . �`,�"�'_ �,..� �''''i � DATE---- --- �: TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I Ai.[.A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF IIU-N-FINGTOiti B ACII AND i AGREE WITH T [I rC)[ LC>V+'I�JG STATE- MENTS: N w 1 SI PPOR A NI':W SE` iOR t:EN [ER _ I Si ri'POI T 'tHE ENVIRONNI.FT•Jz,�I.: IN[Pf\L'C R.EPORT' (EIR) raa SUPPOPT A SENIOR C EN>I R, l TI-f:E GOLDBNWEST .AND "Tt L,L�E'.�T I,OC:A" IC_)hT 'r�ICI) Qit'' BY THE CITiZE;NS O ' tlUINTINCr"T'O?�i BE.aC;H rs co DATE 7`—%� SIGNATURE__:] _ -- TO ALL OF THE HIINTINGT®�BEACH CITE'COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE F&LO.VJING STATEMENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) e I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTERAT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH r SIGNATURE 1 Yy DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTI1" G TON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A.RESIDENT OF THE CITY O HtJNTI'vt_Ir0N BEACH AND I AGREE WlT'II "I-IIE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: l SI)"PI'Olz .": N,Flm/ SI NPL'Ii .('.E--I I fl. 0 I Si.IPPG)WI THE LN'\lJR0'NN/!1,.NJ'A.l:. I.-IiPA1:'T ICI PORI- (EIM . I E�ITtF AT' I'i�I? G01 DENWEST ION VOTED 4}N BY TrII; (-,)F C _NTi-NITI }N 1ia.,H J SIGNATUIZt _� _� DATE Q)�- TO ALL OF THE: HUNTING'TON BLEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE `t'I'IH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: I SL;PF'ORT A NEW SENIOR "ENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRC--)N NIIENTAL IMPACT I:EPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HI?NTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE- - ' _-- - _ DATE if `112- TO ALL'_OF THE IILTN'TINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF 14UNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITII THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: i SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER O ? SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR.) S I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TA.LBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTIlVGTON BEACH AAAAAA SIGNATURE -DATE�. -�C'�'t s` - --- --------- --- -- ALL OF THE RUNTINGTOTNI i3Ei -A-CP, CITY COUNCI-(L MF-NmBERS I A N I A !U,"S-I D OF THE CITY OF HUNT INGTO'4 BEACH AND I AGREE 'vViTh THE FOLLOW.INGY STATE- -MEN't S-. -cl T SUPPORTA NEW SENIOR. Clt--',N'-AER I S'UIPPORT THE ENV IRIONMEN,rAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR:) -71 I SUPPOR'll'A SENIOR CENJER AT 1"HE GOLDENWE ST AND TAI-BERI' 1,0(',.,\T,.f N VO-ITED ON BY THE CITIZENS Or H(-l'-zNTlNGT0N BEACH SIGNATURE DATE - TO ALL OF THE HUNTIi'`rG TON BEACH CITY CL?L.,NC>IL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH TIDE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS. f S 1P 't_)RT AN TEW SENIOR CENTY.R. I TP17"ORT 'THE IINVIRO NMENTti L POPACT REPORT (EIR) n ; S'JiPPOR'-i-A SENIOR ('EN 17ER AT 'I-If6_ GOLDEN«'EST VOTED ON ;3*Y 01"IZI?N5 CIF FIUNT'INC►r['ON BEACH d�ur�� r� rr/�.� 'f g- '! � �V SiCi?�r1"I LTRE �'( '�Yf�tZ- p DATE �1 `— ---------- -- -- --- �i`�� �" Z_ TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITE' COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A. RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE— MENTS: DW I SUPP0R" A `>1EW SENIOR CENTER y UPx'i_ I�.1- HE FN`'1kON�it NI'AL INII'A""1 RE:PORT (EIR'� I �[:�P�t�kT A S 1`�TOR. ;El�'"II .P ik" THE GOI. 3}_:`wWEST AN' TALI3IsRT LOCATION VOTED ON i3Y THE HZENS OF HLNTTINGTON BEACH SIGN/�TL;RE DATE 2`_ TO ALL OF THE HITNTINGIrTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL IL MEMBERS I AMA RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTO N BEACH AND 1 AGR �, ti`v ITII THE if C�i l.(�`ING S"I�A T',1- MEN'I'S: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CF'NTER • I SUPPOR"i THE E,NVlR0-\%,lhTNTAL IM1':hC'I' REPORT (EIR) I SI iPPOIi T A Si NIOR C:EN I'BR A F 'I'IIE- GC)L7Ds NW; ST ANIi 'I'AL.BLR'T 1,0C'.:AT'LON V 1 j'L:I) (?N BY 'rl E CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: • I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER • I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENISR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON -_-BY THE CITIZET t OF HUN GTON BEACH ry, _ SIGNATURE DATE TO ALL, OF THE UUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I A VI A iZE.SID"EN:I OF ITIE CITY OF HIT.f\iTINGTON BEACH AND I AG.REE VVI"il3 TIDE r'l)C I.OW1''G ST&T 13- VEFT,4'fS: m 1 Sl -Ppo.ikT '-rl-IE FNVIP:.C►NM NTA[. I-NIYACT RE',3OR'I k'EIRj (�AITIZFINIS S(JPPORT` A SENIOR.CFNTER A.T TT E GOI.I JENWI STiOl ) TA3_B! IZ1 -C;CATION OTED ON BYTIIF��F IIE NTIN GTO 13FA� H i 'F SIG`IATI RF, Y / JL._ `� --DA7 r TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: Y I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) S I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �'������,� �l%Z DATE SIGNATURE ] ,ref TO,_;�kt,L OF THE HUNTIh?GTON BEACH CITY COUN C IT, ,VII?NWERS i AMA R_FSIDENT OF TIDE CITY OF 'Ii N'T,NU'IONl BEACH AND, -; AGIZI'll; W t'I lI THE 1FOLLOW iNG ST ATE- MEN 1'S: a I SUPPOI2_T A NNEW SENIOR IL. { I'[TIF;i-;S OF F' TING31'ON BEAC Ult TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM'A,RESIDENT OF, THE CITY HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE- MENTS: * I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER 0 1 SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (ETR) 0 1 SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OFHUNTf_NGTON -,-BEACH SIGNATURE TO ALL OF THY.-HUNTINGTON UA,, CH CITE' COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATE MENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER ® I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) e 1 SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THL CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE DATE TO ALL OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I AM A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: ® I SUPPORT A NEW SENIOR CENTER e I SUPPORT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) • I SUPPORT A SENIOR CENTER AT THE GOLDENWEST AND TALBERT LOCATION VOTED ON BY THE CITIZENS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIGNATURE S DATE .* rY 0 ALL OF 1 ME HIiN`IING I ON BEACH CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS I A�i A RFSIDENT OL TIIE CITY O iUNTiNGTON BEACH AND I AGREE WITr-I THE FOLLOWING STATE- MEN'TS: IS U`P TIDE ENV IRON MEN'IA_L -1_NMPACT RL;PORT 'EIR) I SUPPORT A ttiI?��OR Ct'�yNTER AT T-14E ("OLDENWESC AND TALBERT L' CATION VOTF.'D ON Bar TIgE CI"IIZENS (-)F Il"JI (TINGT'ON B ACH SIGNATURE-- -----_6=-