HomeMy WebLinkAboutSenior Center - Central Park - LEED - Leadership in Energy 11. (City Council) Approve the design and construct the new senior center in
Huntington Central Park to be equivalent to a "Certified" Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design (LEER) building utilizing as many
environmentally "green" elements in the building as feasible within the
project funding.
Recommended Action:
Approve the design and construct the new senior center in Huntington Central
Park to be equivalent to a "Certified" LEED building.
Approved as amended to direct staff to look for additional
efficiencies/alternatives toward 2.2 Silver equivalent certification through
potential savings in the bid process.
6-1 (Hardy No)
12. (City Council) Approve and authorize execution of Amendment No. 1 to
the Professional Services Contract with Ferguson Group, LLC in an
amount not to exceed $89,005 annually, reflecting a ten percent (10%)
reduction in their current contract for professional services related to the
acquisition of federal funds for priority projects within the City and related
legislative issues.
Recommended Action:
Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute "Amendment No. 1 to
Agreement Between the City of Huntington Beach and the Ferguson Group, LLC".
Approved 7-0
13. (Redevelopment Agency) Approve and authorize the Chairperson and
Agency Clerk to execute amendments between the City of Huntington
Beach Redevelopment Agency and 1) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in
the amount of$126,000 for additional consulting services associated with
the update of the Downtown Parking Master Plan, and authorize increasing
the total contract amount to $271,453; and, 2) RRM Design Group, Inc. in the
amount of$65,000 for additional consulting services associated with
planning and urban design services to update the Downtown Specific Plan,
and authorize increasing the total contract amount to $680,574. On June 1,
both consultants agreed to the ten percent (10%) reductions requested by
the City/Agency, to be deducted on each invoice.
Redevelopment Agency Recommended Action:
Approve Amendments to the Professional Services Contract Agreement
between the City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency and Kimley-
Horn and Associates in the amount of$126,000 for additional services and to
authorize increasing the total contract fee to $271,453 and approve an
Amendment to the RRM Design Group Agreement in the amount of$65,000 for
a total contract fee of$680,574. Authorize the Chairperson and Agency Clerk
to sign both Amendments.
Approved 6-0-1 (Dwyer abstain)
Council/Agency Action Agenda
Tuesday, September 08, 2009
r
Council/Agency Meeting Held: d 0�
Deferred/Continued to:
A prove ® o dition Ily A p v ® De ied y Cler s Signa6ife
Council Meeting Date: 9/8/2009 Department ID Number: CS 09-010
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COON MEMBERS
SUBMITTED BY: FRED A. WILSON, CITY ADMINISTRA
y`'
PREPARED BY: JIM B. ENGLE, COMMUNITY SERVICE DIR C
SUBJECT: SEEK LEED CERTIFICATION OF NEW SENT ENTER
Eat::nt:o:f Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis,Environmental Status,Attachment(s)
Statement of Issue: When City Council approved the design of the new senior center, staff
was directed to utilize as many environmentally "green" elements in the building as feasible
within the project funding.
Funding Source: N/A
Recommended Action: Motion to: Approve the design and construct the new senior
center in Huntington Central Park to be equivalent to a "Certified" LEED building.
Alternative Action(s): Direct staff to return to City Council with the specific costs required
to attain "Silver" LEED certification.
Analysis: On February 4, 2008, City Council approved the design of the new senior center
building and associated amenities, such as parking and landscaping. City Council discussed
the possibility of designing and constructing the building to meet Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED) certification. LEED is the accepted accreditation standard for
an environmentally "green" building. Council directed staff to seek the equivalent of a
"Certified" LEED rating. There was also discussion that a higher LEED rating, such as
"Silver", would be desirable if it could be accomplished with the funding available for the new
senior center project. LPA, a LEED-certified consultant, indicated at the Council meeting,
that to receive a formal LEED review and rating of a building is expensive. City Council, at
that time, did not indicate interest in getting the building LEED certified due to the extra cost;
but instead, Council wanted to strive for an environmentally "green" building by using the
equivalent of LEED certification criteria.
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
MEETING DATE: 9/8/2009 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: CS 09-010
Makar was directed to hire consultants who were LEED certified to design the building.
Additionally, city staff and consultants worked with the City's Energy Project Manager to
confirm the work performed by Makar consultants met the LEED compliance criteria and
points system.
Based on the current design, the building meets the "Certified" LEED criteria. Makar
consultants indicate that in order to achieve a "Silver" LEED certification would require up to
an additional $600,000 in construction and design. This additional funding is not available in
the project budget. It is important to note that the project has concluded the Design
Development Phase. Redesigning the senior center to achieve a higher LEED certification
would delay the project.
Because Makar is using LEED-certified consultants and their assessment meets the LEED
criteria, staff does not recommend paying the additional cost of having the project officially
evaluated by the LEED organization. The LPA consultant indicated that to hire LEED to
perform this official evaluation would add approximately $140,000'to the project's cost.
Based on the cost for LEED certification and the additional expense of attaining a rating of
"Silver" LEED, staff is recommending that the project be approved in its current form, which is
equivalent to a "Certified" LEED level. This certification will be based on the LEED
compliance criteria met by Makar's LEED-certified consultants and verified by the City's
project team, including the Energy Project Manager.
Strategic Plan Goal: Maintain, Improve, and Obtain Funding for Public Improvements. The
approved senior center is being funded through the Park Fees of the Pacific City Project. It is
being designed to the equivalency of a "Certified" LEED level. This will insure quality design
and construction for the new senior center recreation and human services facility for the
community.
'Environmental Status: N/A. Project was certified by City Council on February 4, 2008.
AttaachmentU:
" , o - m - m ® - o 0
1. LEED Project Check List
2. New Senior Center LEED List
-2- 8/25/2009 3:54 PM
ATTACHMENT # 1
LEED for New Construction v 2.2
Registered Project Checklist
Project Name:
Project Address:
Yes ? No
A -� . ► - 69 ,oI ,:
Certified:26-32 points Silver:33-38 points Gold:39-51 points Platinum:52-69 points
Yes ? No
Prereq 1 Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Required
Credit 1 Site Selection 1
Credit 2 Development Density&Community Connectivity 1
Credit 3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1
Credit4.1 Alternative Transportation,Public Transportation 1
Credit 4.2 Alternative Transportation,Bicycle Storage&Changing Rooms 1
Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation,Low-Emitting&Fuel Efficient Vehicles 1
Credit 4.4 Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity 1
Credit 5.1 Site Development,Protect or Restore Habitat 1
Credit 5.2 Site Development,Maximize Open Space 1
Credit 6.1 Stormwater Design,Quantity Control 1
Credit 6.2 Stormwater Design,Quality Control 1
Credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect,Non-Roof 1
Credit 7.2 Heat Island Effect,Roof 1
Credit 8 Light Pollution Reduction 1
Yes ? No
Credit 1.1 Water Efficient Landscaping,Reduce by 50% 1
Credit 1.2 Water Efficient Landscaping,No Potable Use or No Irrigation 7
Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 1
Credit 3.1 Water Use Reduction,20%Reduction 1
Credit 3.2 Water Use Reduction,30%Reduction 1
iaE?A'f.'I'i'S�47tJ
Adobe-
Y iveCyc1e, Last Modified:May2008 1of4
LEED for New Construction v 2.2
EE° Registered Project Checklist
Yes ii ? No
f
Prereq 1 Fundamental Commissioning of the Building Energy Systems Required
Prereq 1 Minimum Energy Performance Required
Prereq 1 Fundamental Refrigerant Management Required
*'Note for EAcl: All LEED for New Construction projects registered after June 26,2007 are required to achieve at least two(2)points.
—^ I �--� Credit 1 Optimize Energy Performance 1 to 10
Credit 1.1 10.5%New Buildings /3.5%Existing Building Renovations 1
Credit 1,2 14%New Buildings/7%Existing Building Renovations 2
Credit 1.3 17.5%New Buildings /10.5%Existing Building Renovations 3
Credit 1.4 21%New Buildings /14%Existing Building Renovations 4
Credit 1.5 24.5%New Buildings /17.5%Existing Building Renovations 5
Credit 1.6 28%New Buildings/21%Existing Building Renovations 6
Credit 1.7 31.5%New Buildings /24.5%Existing Building Renovations 7
Credit 1.8 35%New Buildings /28%Existing Building Renovations 8
Credit 1.9 38.5%New Buildings /31.5%Existing Building Renovations 9
_ C.redit 1.10 42%New Buildings /35%Existing Building Renovations 10
Credit 2 On-Site Renewable Energy 1 to 3
Cred1'2.1 2.5%Renewable Energy I
;�:ret it 2,12 7.5%Renewable Energy 2
C::redit:2.:3 12.5%Renewable Energy 3
Credit 3 Enhanced Commissioning 1
Credit 4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 1
Credit 5 Measurement&Verification 1
Credit 6 Green Power 1
Adobe- LiveCyele Last Modified:May 2008 2 of 4
LEED for New Construction v 2.2
eE Registered Project Checklist
Yes ? No
Prereq 1 Storage&Collection of Recyclables Required
Credit 1.1 Building Reuse,Maintain 75%of Existing Walls,Floors&Roof 1
Credit 1.2 Building Reuse,Maintain 95%of Existing Walls,Floors&Roof 1
Credit 1.3 Building Reuse,Maintain 50%of Interior Non-Structural Elements 1
Credit 2.1 Construction Waste Management,Divert 50%from Disposal 1
Credit 2.2 Construction Waste Management,Divert 75%from Disposal 1
Credit 3.1 Materials Reuse,5% 1
Credit 3.2 Materials Reuse,10% 1
Credit 4.1 Recycled Content,10%(post-consumer+1/2 pre-consumer) 1
Credit 4.2 Recycled Content,20%(post-consumer+1/2 pre-consumer) 1
Credit 5.1 Regional Materials, 10%Extracted,Processed&Manufactured 1
Credit 5.2 Regional Materials,20%Extracted, Processed&Manufactured 1
Credit 6 Rapidly Renewable Materials 1
Credit 7 Certified Wood 1
Yes ? No
Prereq 1 Minimum IAQ Performance Required
Prereq 2 Environmental Tobacco Smoke(ETS)Control Required
Credit 1 Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring 1
Credit 2 Increased Ventilation 1
Credit 3.1 Construction IAQ Management Plan,During Construction 1
Credit 3.2 Construction IAQ Management Plan,Before Occupancy 1
Credit 4.1 Low-Emitting Materials,Adhesives&Sealants 7
Credit 4.2 Low-Emitting Materials,Paints&Coatings 1
` Credit 4.3 Low-Emitting Materials,Carpet Systems 1
Credit 4.4 Low-Emitting Materials,Composite Wood&Agrifiber Products 1
Credit 5 Indoor Chemical&Pollutant Source Control 1
Credit 6.1 Controllability of Systems,Lighting 1
Credit 6.2 Controllability of Systems,Thermal Comfort 1
Credit 7.1 Thermal Comfort,Design 1
Credit 7.2 Thermal Comfort,Verification 1
Credit 8.1 Daylight&Views,Daylight 75%of Spaces 1
Credit 8.2 Daylight&Views,Views for 90%of Spaces 1
v"cic.°°er<ru�y
Adobe
1 iveCycl e,,, Last Modified:May 2008 3 of 4
LEED for New Construction v 2.2
EE° Registered Project Checklist
Yes ? No
Credit 1.1 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title 1
Credit 1.2 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title 1
Credit 1.3 Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title 1
Credit 1 A Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title 1
Credit 2 LEED®Accredited Professional 1
Adobe- LiveCycle. Last Modified:May 2008 4 of 4
ATTAC H M E N T #2
(EE0,6A O' DESCRIPTION O ® -o •o
RT
Sustainable Sites 1.Alternative Transportation-Public Transportation Site adjacent to bus stop for at least 2 lines. 4.1 1
" p 9 p y "Reductron o parking spots&striping for _ 1
2 .Alternative Trans, -,ortation „Parkin Ca acit - 3 t hybrids;and carpools 4 4
3. Stormwater Design-Quality Control Bioswales,filter strips, bioretention. 6.2 1
4. Heat Island EffectRoofi Built-up roof be`tl cool roof W 7.2 1
34
5. Light Pollution Reduction Minimize light trespass. 8 1
Water Efficiency 1.Water Efficient Landscaping-Reduce by 5Q°!� Using native,"droughf italerantplants. 1,1 1 "
s.
2. Innovative Wastewater Technology Using very low flow toilets, urinals. 2 1
ww ,
3.Water Use
..
�'ietlutt�on 'Reduction � � �:, '' Low,�ctwfixtur0s„+,:,droughttclera�t�atadscapmg-.,� = ���:,.. ,_ 3.1 ��"+� 1:,
Energy 1. Optimize Energy Performance Energy savings will be at least 14%. 1 2
� _ Federal Funds allocated to hire Cx agents waiting for approval from 3 1
A
&Atmosphere hanced Cpinmissionlrig
Feds&desigri'team.
3. Enhanced Refrigerant Management HVAC will not use CFC-based refrigerants. 4 1
4. eascement&Verification M&V.Plan._and acti _ mgAci -wide EECBG,effort. � "vities:part cf Pentl t
„
o There is no second point for M&V(this row should be deleted) The
5. Measurement&Verification 20/o Green Power point could be achieved for a$5-10K.expenditure. 5 1
Materials 1. Construction Waste Manag`4ment- E
�. .:" 2.1 1=
&Resources Divert 50%from Disposal See below.
2. Canstructio Waste Managem
ent- �, ,� . - 2.2" 'VIT,
Divert 75%from Disposal Rainbow disposal diverting 90%+.
3 Recycled Content
10% (post-consumer 1/2 pre-consumer) Use products with recycled content.
4. Ref ....._
Banal-Mafenals, �M ,.....
10% Extracted, Processed&Manufactured Regionally Use local(within 500 miles)products.
E r"
_5. Certified Waod Recognize FSC or SFt certrficati,ofi,limited biidgit impact 7
Indoor 1. Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring: Install CO2 sensors. 1 1
Environmental 2, Cons
truction IAQ Management"Plan ; Provide docunentationfrom contractor. 3 1 1
,... o .,,..." :..
Quality 3. Low-Emitting Materials-Adhesives&Sealants Specify low-emitting adhesives and sealants. 4.1 1
oatin s Speci 4.LAvErititfing Ma terials-Paints&3C g _ �. .. ..... fy low-emitting paint.";'' 4.2 1
5. Low-Emitting Materials-Carpet Systems Specify low-emitting carpet. 4.3 1
This om was on in`'Il on Maker`s list"s'
P 9 y o there should oe no
6 Thermal Comfort.-�Des�gn �� ,.�.� � 1
°; 7.1
encrOmenta!-cost .
7.Thermal Comfort-Verification Community services to survey occupants on thermal comfort after 7.2 1
occupancy.
8. Daylight&Views--QaylightF75�10 of;Spaces, Most spaces have4access to natural"light. ." 8.1 , 1
Innovation 1. Innovation in Design: Educational Displays Incoporate educational displays on green features. 6.1 1 x.,
&Degn 2 Innovation in Design: Wildlife Monitoring (Shipley). Sh�pley'na#ure center volunteers will monitor waldfife on-site 6.2 1
Process 2. Innovation in Design: Habitat Enhancement(landscaping) Shipley nature center determined landscape plantings to enhance 6.3 1
habitat.
2lnncvation In Design. - ,
x 6.3
11
Through providing top-notch Sr amenities HB will"be reducing vehicle
Local Senior Amenities(mileage savings) miles travelled compared to Senior's previous driving habits. 6.4
Community Services to survey to measure impact.
3. LEED ACeredited professional Several members of design staff are LEED AP. •"
CERTIFIED LEED=26 TO 32 POINTS SENIOR CENTER TOTAL LEED POINTS = 27 32
" Pending Bid Process
CA ROUTING SHEET
INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Community Services
SUBJECT: LEED Certification New Senior Center
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: September 8, 2009
RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS
Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Resolution (w/exhibits &legislative draft if applicable) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Attached ❑
Not Ap licable
Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) Attached ❑
(Si ned in full by the City Attorne ) Not Applicable,
Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. Attached ❑
(Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable
Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Fiscal Impact Statement (Unbudgeted, over $5,000) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Bonds (If applicable) Attached ❑
Not Applicable
Staff Report (If applicable) Attached ❑
Not Ap licable
Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Attached ❑
Not A plicable
Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached ❑
Not Applicable
EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS
REVIEWED RETPkj4ED FOR A D FE®
Administrative Staff ', ( ) )
Deputy City Administrator Initial )
City Administrator Initial ( )
City Clerk )
EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM:
a
lu-
a o .
RCA Author: Engle x5495