HomeMy WebLinkAboutPier Buildings: A presentation of design elements presented CITY OF HUNTING■ ON 'BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
DECEMBER 15, 2008
PERMANENT PIER BUILDINGS
37UEDV SE33DOM PURPOSE:
REVIEW OF BUILDING DESIGN CONCEPTS
RICK BRADY ASSOCIATES and
PLAT'T/ WH'ITEL:AW ARCHITECTS
Wa
tsr
Gi ��fl
EXISTING STRUCTURES
n
s
x
I
a
Proposed Permanent Structures
Public Restroom for Huntington Beach Pier
&hong�Pwbb
ED
�` 't d�� �RqM a�vseye ucture. y,�Yw��
3 wi
EXISTING STRUCTURES
Kite Connection
77
1 ;
9g x
'gym "�•.� ..F�. � a . . w r .**.�'��� „�s'"'i >
2
EXISTING STRUCTURES
Let's Go Fishing
. � $
%{
Y
�:: vv 8 2»
4a v{ .�4 xT y - n b S •..,f ,yam" � k., *( y, y';
iv t
011
r »
s
;A
EXISTING STRUCTURES
Surf City Store
u
3
LOESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA"
DRB guidelines are to look at other structures-in
the area for design elements. This includes:
Type of architectural design
Colors
Types of materials
Specific design elements
Compatibility with surroundings
EXISTING STRUCTURES
Tower Zero
-,Octagonal shape, dolor, (Corbels &'Angled Windows
4 I t
9 Jt
iF
g"_
JAP
4
EXISTING STRUCTURES
I Y
Octagonal shape, Columns, ,arlheti. coIc.>rti
wn
IF
d
�L9
1
G .
S f
f
�yn
*.... ."e. dr
.. f.,
NEW BUILDING LOCATIONS
�`:;tea � n,� �k' w: ���' .a f fir• :,,d <'�.,, < f.
SAY �
Proposed Permanent Structures
for Huntington Beach Pie .}
.� O�sena Struviures N .y
p,� rmenentswauree `'*
E?
o s
PERMANENT PIER BUILDINGS
Architect Overview by:
Sandy Gramley
Platt / Whitelaw Architects
Q(� I! LI O H 6 6 A 4 9
6
OPTION "All 6-SIDED ®ESION
r
x'•.s
7 .' .� .. .
»ruC-
v
aa ...
Yr,1 HUNTINGTON BEACH PIER FECEICE,
SHELL BUILDINGS FOR VENDORS
oITWY 0 1-UVINGCh EEACa FOR THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
OPTION "All 6-SIDED-DESIGN
F.
OA
wl
A
�'Y �tiTf'YSt
7
®PTI®N "All 6-SIDED DESIGN
Jut
�y
VIE pC}WN PIER
'OPTION "All 6-SIDED DESIGN
Oa`
'tl1
ro
PLAN AT SMALL PAD
OPTION "All 6®SIDE® ESI. N
EXIST. i�•R.
PLAN AT LARGE PAD
PERMANENT Fe UILDI, S
9
PTI N Is I' 8®SIDE® DESIGN
F a �
h
h l
4
OPTION "B" -SIDE® ®ESION
1-144
�a
QOW,N PIER
10
OPTION "B" 8-SIDED DESIGN
S70 SF
NEvq SHELL, gU1LtiS 65
_57o sF
PLAN AT SMALL PAD
OPTION "B" 8-SIDED DESIGN
�J
EMST. RR
PLAN AT LARGE PAD
11
DESIGN ELEMENT CHOIC $
Floor plans influenced/restricted by shape ofpier platforms
Elements from surrounding buildings
FIRSTPLATFORM:
o 6 sided bldg (620sf)vs. 8 sided bldg (570sf)
o Corbels vs. Slanted/Angled Windows (Tower Zero)
o;Decorative accent band along bottom portion of each bldg (treated,
colored.concrete or faux stone)
o.Color: "Beachcomber" (tan)on walls, "Oblisk" (sand) accent color on
columns and "Grand Banks Blue"window frames/doors.
THIRD PLATFORM (by existing 820 sf Restroom Bldg):
a:Same'design choices as Ist.platform
`
--OR—
Duplicate Existing Restroom Exterior Design w/columns, arches, .
colors, and 6 sided shape; but add windows
MAKE BUILDINGS SPECIAL ®.140
ART: Add an ART WALL or MURAL
e �'7_ U,
"
n
a.kr.6v- a "
� t
.S
12
CITY COUNCL INPUT ON DC SGN
ELEMENTS. . . ..
Sta. returns to City- Council ®n January
5 for final direction
13
f
gx«
f
14