The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutStudy Session on New Senior Center J CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �p} : HUNTINGTON BEACH Community Services ices Department �q p r9 [} To Mayor and City Council Via City Administrator From Jim B. Engle, Director, Community Servic 4 Date March 7, 2006 Subject Parch 20, 2006 Study Session on New Seniors' Center City staff has been working the past few months with the Council on Aging (COA) and LPA, the consultant hired to prepare the report on the feasibility of a new seniors' center. The report addresses potential site locations within the city, comparison with other cities' seniors' centers square footage, a use study identifying required square footage for a new senior center, financial analysis of costs for entitlement process, design and construct a new seniors' center, analysis of operating costs vs. potential revenue, and an overview on types of funding opportunities to pay for capital project. Attached is LPA's preliminary report. Council will receive a bound report as well as the PowerPoint at the Study Session on March 20, 2006. J BE:cr Attachment cc: Janeen Laudenback 4 "..sow City -of Hu nitington - Beach ..- _ New Senior Center 'Study Presentation to the City Council March 20, 2006 j f t ij i I I 1 w 4 ` ram' R i i y r. J .4 III, 4 4 a a■ ' rr, ep• Mt d+4 I L7 CityHuntingtonof Beach New Senior Center .o,..� � �,� � 6 �� r � .,, o Y .. � �;•' �+"' S,� � {�yy'� r _ N-''�" 1� ^k� 4,1_Ve , k, • ,1.• - .. CouncilIN INS MINE MIMI New-C- -enter-C-om Ittee on • • Staff Ralph . e Chair • Norma i e • ' Gibbsa e' Laudenback Bob Dettloff Randv Pesque,ira De Cathye �I t 0 Presentation verview oo • Assessment Space • • . • Analysis AnalysisFinanclial Conceptual jj#jjj '.r• lif Needs' Assessment Process Stuff Workshop (1 ) • COA' Workshop (1 ). r r Public Workshops 2 — — -- - - ro — COA Cornm$ittele Meetings (2). ., 41� • COA Board Meetings (1 ) � p Demographic Analysis zr • Trends and DeveJop:me,ntal - 1 i Needs Analysis Market Analysis Comparative An,-alys,i Public Worksh.ops Comments Included,: Warm and lnviti�nig Ample Parking Park Setting Paths) and Walking Trails 9 Better Acoustics * Meeting/Cla.-ss.room Space Modern Kitchen FitnessEquipm,ent Dembg' raphic Analysis 60+ Population 64 Increase 60,00.0 7 50,000 374% Increase . 40,000 - - 30,000 20',00 - 10,000 0 r9q 2005 2020 k 7 Trends Developmental Age SelfwConcept 63% Feel Ywnger Than They Are Feeling Younger Is About: Good Health Staying in Good Shape • • • h i - 0 Not "O,[cler" Until at ` • • • • • of • • Retirement Expectations Work Part-Time or Volunteer • Have Time for Recreation & Exercise W®' • Have a Hobby or Pursue � ,�' ' Special Interests ' y • Enjoy Better Health than Past Generations • Live Longer Work Expectations • 70% ,Pla,n to Cont .naue Working Full or- Part:-Time ' Phased Retirement is Increasing Rates of Self-Employment Rise - with Age Those 50+ are: 25 of Workforce . f l 40% of All Self-Employed 16..4% of 50+ Self-Employed 1 in 3 Began Self-Employment t After 50 Social Connections ' • Create Easy Accessibility - • Provide ,Activities to Share ' Common Interests • Fight Depression • Reduce Fear of Being Alone � f • Eliminate Difficulty in Finding Companio.nship - Health and Wellness Prescription sSupplement OfficesEducation Dispensing for Visilting 'Healthcare Professionals eServices Diagnostic • A • V'rtual, Doctor's Office Weflness NjI "f q Fitness 'Interests Adults Over 55 are Fastest G row ng H e ail th Club Group • Insurers Prefer Paying, for • Health Rather than Disease 54 /o of Boomers Expect to Exercise Re ularl g y in Retirement • 25 /o of Fitness Room Users are Over 5 ; • Personal Training - 51 fo o ` Clients Are 45 or Older , fn k\ 7 Serving the Needs • Spaces and, Activities that Promote Socialization - ' • Activities Designed to Meet !; New People-- - • Activities and Support for .: pp Working Older Adults Classrooms and Classes. to Support a Wide Ran,g.e of Inferest ., • Saces and Programs for p g Promote- Health and Wel`lne:ss , � � _ _ •� •.._ yr► � \ d��,/ �{��- �� - �� "`?•- �3 f � i„ ,. � •� � �,�� _ �.. .- � s � it �L .•.• � _ =r-�_= '��°S' �j`' � sue- � 1 .. � ..' ,. ' �PPIL T AND 0 5 T1 1 .; i,I, 11 �1 !.' •�f u -to �j � ,� \` _'�—��—� �� _�,�,i r�� '��tjJa��. � aceSp Recommendation BuildingSupport 4941 O SF ,j Reception Desk _ Cafe ,- -_ Social Lounge �= • Administrative Offices . . • Maintenance / Storage/ Workshop m —�•-� - `"°"'`` ) "I, �k "46 • Custodial Storage I Rancho Santa,�Margarita Regional Community Center Resource Center 29030 SF • Consultation Office / Health .. Services • COA Office n, • Offices for Social Work and Case Management • r =- Business Center to Support Work • 'Resource Center for Visiting Services y 1` • T Tri:ps and Travel Office Space` - ! � 1 `1 Education Center 39900 SF • Computer / Technology Room • Art & Crafts- Studio - • Classrooms / Meeting Rooms 'Distance Learning / Video Confarencing Center ¢.�#ox i Il�� t�1, _ •AR ,.; t � Awn I '\ �; 4� U 1_ -� � _ y1."h� �� 45�`_�IIII(""��1r tl � � .Y"�q�t��• �Solanoys "' Club ==r �• _ -Social Center 14040 SF • Social Lounge - • Community Hall • Kitchen y • Meals to the Home / � � - Culinary Classroom • Game Room Rancho Santa Margarita Regional Community Center Social Lounge • Promotes Social Interaction r: • Warm and Inviting • Comfortable Sp a c;e,, � r; • Well Lit and O-p e n r 1 , -a ,g ll ' r >�" f MISM _�` _ '�',rl:ems. �� i'Ib,� ' •. -. - i 1 .Jc i `;', Mi'ss`on Viejo 'Library t k , �� Rancho Sa�n,tfa Margantfa Regi®n,aC*omrr�unit� Center.. mRom Ga e o r J \ ltm rn ® Ma y . ! l ... Ci�t� of Anaherm Downtown pC:o 9�rnunit= `:Center 'Rancho Santa Mars ariGt'a Region,al':C®.►r�munit�, ;Center a_ W.. . . a Y Y J Communitv Hall o Theater with Bistro Table Seating - - -- - j i • Dinner at the Movies I j • Plays • Musical Performances — �f r s�7 y" �f�Tl �•.. +� a � 4 t e"M S c. CommunityHall ::E 17jr.1 'Concerts q Cinema Nights • Musical Performances a _ �I �� • M�' �� AFL k L • 'Rla s and Dinner Theater r Rental Space ZZ 1 ,_l FF 0 c Jewis�ha Commun tv Hall -MAW AP Mel Ali W I r n A 4or _ Y t' _ Y - .��®; ■ Communit Room Courtyard Y Ai' 1,yr. „_�-. S i I I �4�` � � -,•� .r� lrn 1 k • —_— -__ _. -_-- Ralncho California Recreatliona1,Center, Kitchen • Daily ..Meal Program • Meals to the Home / Culinary Classroom P t • Nutrition Site Offices Catering and Special 4 I Events Meals } I t - Rob�e'H,,Livermore . ommu,I ty ' -Cter --- Meals to the Home / Culinary Classroom yI I 4 EL��ra.:�..1 jL: -i•4y. � n I• f.: � �x 3; i I _ _ � key •'I �� i�i� 1. AFi F �r 0 �- 4, wn 0 op-W ri .r, �',A"dt '�'^i,�r�'wwsp - {.,� ;�+` r�,�t•; "P 'ti;i ,,a �. t u,�y. , ".r� �� d, :. �1-�z3r ��. �i''�+` •pr�y„yi � � .. xx ',� '~.�� s�s"`� '4 �"°s"�ifk?;r,� o{�g.;,�r;�:e . y t�'.3V: ijt• y� a� .�r;;�"Y' '��•',•i ��45 � Yl.i^x' r'1 �%ra^ j}�,?ff'•�rix'fxy Q Y i.1�''�t�.^X�l .fl ryf��L`�Y*i � SJ.'� 5ftllat- `�wb?4Y4�. • Fitness & Wellness Center 8,570 SF _ • Group 'Exercise 'Room a • Fitness Room with C`ardio and weli� .h�t Equipment g • Fitness Assessment & Testing • Dance Room 4 r� 1 .. 3 -!K A NJ y A Moreno. `Vwiley Co.m'rriunity • • dh Ah • • d' M Dance Studio • 'Mu-1ti'- Use Space -- • Dance Lessons f.. • Tap Classes :: • Social DanceOrr ILI Program Space Summary. Building Support 47410 SF Resource Center 27030 SF Education Center 37900 SF Social Center 14,040 SF Fitness and Wellness Center 87570 SF Transportation Center 1 ,020 SF ................................................................................................................................................................................................. Subtotal Net Assignable 337970 SF Grossing Factor (C'irculation, Mechanical, Walls) 11320 SF Total Gross Building Area 45,290 SF Senior Center ProgrammingArea 1975 MOW 2020* .......................................................................................................... Total City Population 60+ 61 887' 3`21670 535579 Total Square Footage 1, 1 ,.500 SF 14,505 SF 14,505 SF Facility SF/ 5,000, 10,531 SF 29220 SF 19354 SF * Population Projections Courtesy of Applied Geographic Solutions Comparative Standard = FacilitySF City of Huntington City of City of Beach Cerritos Irvine Michael E. Rodgers Cerritos Senior Lakeview. Senior Center & Center at & Rancho Outreach Center Pat Nixon Park Centers Number of Visits Weekly 21090 25219 31775 Residents Age 60+* 32,670 81349 18, 116 Total Square Footage 14,505 SF 27,550 SF 333000 SF * Population Projections Courtesy of Applied Geographic Solutions Comparative Standard = Population City of Huntington City of City of Beach Cerritos Irvine ................................................................................................................................................................................................ Population Total City Population 2005* 196,087 535946 155,823 Adults 60+ 2005* 32,670 87349 185116 % of Total Population 60+ 16.7% 15.5% 11 .6% Facility SF/ 5,000 25220 SF 169499 SF 99108 SF * Population Projections Courtesy of Applied Geographic Solutions Comparative Standard = Service Level Square Footage per 5,000 Residents Age 60+ Cerritos 16,499 sf Irvine 91108 sf Fountain Valley 7,489 sf Costa Mesa 6,932 sf Westminster 5,979 sf Huntington Beach 2,220 sf J r t � y ��'n a -1 � tj r�.)j�f rr) �! � 1 r• � f l'•, w-y5 ��arY."��^HtK a'*s s . _ �,r' 'u _j � � 1�✓i '1j ! L'� �f ✓[i r tea k x �'Fl- 1 �,�dk ��,t i:;�Y _ UP r ,, � - � i art h,1:�u4$��, tl� � �r�r�"(rr•*�'4.1tf�t jC�' '� .'_�� '`t�I ...:. �- �A r'd� k � � :y_ :.�` irl, ►�y.Y s _ t / i. '• � :.,� Yt -6 �� ,tip, 'Z-\��::?: t�, � ��(J a �f„ �' ��s�.r.,� � r Outdoor aces Outdoor Spaces "l, • Pre and Post Function Events Check-In Tabley � � .f ay,L�'{ r`.7E, �f.� tom- � G� r• Ti, _�'k'2.yx _ r�-' Y� �• - r 9`r�� • Outdoor Classes A ; __, Mission�Vie�oLib ant j �; t�;h` yr= (h'?.r;r� ��:,e�� r� I y � •_"y. - _ .� - �� ,.h �CyS DLO m �II�I�lI�r' 611r1�tlr N R{ancho s- = = ri �a Gar Ce tier Outdoor Fitness • Outdoor Area for Fitness Classes r,; "ti = �( q , •_ st��" � � r C, �• Tai Chi Yoga Chi Kung ` • to Connection Paths and Trails • Bocce Courts r • Horseshoes - t, t n YM Garden Center Native Plants or Sensory Gardens f _ ° F 1 r_ ��i v'" •,y-c h, r;��• tip" r `.at�f i Spaces for Meditation and J Enjoying Nature A z Provide a Home for n. j n "Pr Gardening Clubs . `# rah k Beautiful and Interactives � '� Surrounding for the Center s_ ;f _ - and Community Room �� i , ' ti4 r,.�'��S�fLu �,�r I..F3 e� 1 `�._�'�`" IF Outdoor Space Summary Auto Parking (200 spaces) 1 .8 AC Landscape .8 AC Courtyards/Gardens/Amenities 1 AC Transportation Vehicles .2 AC Service Area .2 AC ................................................................................................................................................................................................ Building Area 1 AC Total Site Area 5 AC -- -r 4 'arc, •, �-•t� t 7�� '�' w - _ Smite I Site #1 Central Site Evaluations ark E- Q . Goldenwest • Talbert) Site #2 W C7 U O [Y J - 1 J Central ■ ark 1 O 405 (at Ellis 1 � i i i • • I , I , I 1 ' i � WARNER I Site #3 Kettler School ' 1 ' ---------1 --a------ ----j SLATER 1 1 (nearMagnolia a • Site #4 LeBa'rd School � • 1 1 1 I ( T I I (near Brookhurst and •. I I � - OC Station (at Talbert & Gothard) 1 1 I 1 I NTA Site 6 ■ • • • . • Center 11, th 't 17 • �•':RARC.LANO' ll`` PACIFIC l�, �' CONTEXTiw� Site #7 Bartlett Park`1 HIGHWAY OCE0.N JC7 (Beach & Adams) � FREEWAY NOT TO SCALE CIVIC CENTER Site EvaluationCriteria Site Charac.ter'istics a Availability/Size DORSET DR • Building Program • Exterior Program Accommodates Future Expansion '' STILLYV • Topography CD • No Significant Sitework Required Mature Vegetation ,. • Sensitive Site Vegetation EDSISON • Adjacent Uses: Compatibility of NeighborhoodHIGH SCHOOL UNITY • Sensory'lssues: View, Sound, Smell CENTER • Micro Climate: Wind Sun Access [JTATION • Vehicular • Pedestrian HAMILTON AVE • Accommodates Senior Transportation • Public Transit • Central Location Site Evaluation Criteria Special Conditions - ----- --- - • Zoning/Land Use Economic Conditions Site Acquisition Required 01 • Site Owned by City Pertinent Data • Proximity to Civic Services Park/Library) • Maximizes Potential Use of the Site g! • Visibility/Identity to Community • Site Free of Encumbrances - • Amenity of Outdoor Space (Rentable) SITE 3A & 3B PHOTOGRAPHS Site Evaluation Scores- Central Par.`k Central,'Park Kettler School Kettler Fields LeBard OC Transfer Rodgers Lower Bartlett.Park Upper Bartlett Park ■ GW,&Talbert ■ GW.,&-Ellis Campus, Edison Park School Station Senior Center Adams Yorktown 1 : 2 3A. 3`B 4 5 6 7A 7B ................ .. ... ................ - - - _ ... .... .... . . ............... ............ 308 : 28.9 187 235 180 223 2,32 177 170 Site Evaluation Scores ■ Central Park ICentral Park Kettler School Kettler Fields LeBard OC Transfer Rodger's Lower Bartlett Park Upper Bartlett Park ■ GW &Talbert ■ GW & Ellis Campus Edison Park School Station Senior Center Adams Yorktown ■ 1 2 3A 3B 4 5 6 7A 7B . .................... .. .......................................................................... .............................................................................................. 308 289 187 235 180 223 232 177 170 r f t�� , ,�t �=b...+.� ,._ �-k,E�,m .,v •. ,� .,r ,,•(,p��,� -"','fiz, ' .;! i� . ,t ; .,;� ��j � �y �:' '�+y� .��,. ''t �, '�� '.yb. �..��•+i:�.[�f+"�L'Y ,n'�".'aaC J i �zlu•'; .x*.�A I".'� ,",e ��h. ,'yR{ �` r• •t -aP �r`�x"#�. F:»' li�,�m :•�a �. }��-,, ;�G' ;x, t r�,,� '•< 'y�,& Yf { s �`,k"" y�r,�.x,,� � x : 'c�a' �� .•y .�, � 4r w t •� f. ,•�r ,«„j�g` r�•}t"•F �. -.,�`y •,•,�y. .*�,�� •� r�, .� ,,��;'� z.. r �,�: <f ,as "� �-.3., x a ��' .�;fib t �+. �'' �;' 1�' ,;�..�,��'• „�`•4�., 1 ' _ � y�.G. ..r�"1'� ✓. ��ib"f t1 �.'� ^a'� ty'"4 !� ;t.. � t M�-� .�.�_ - � �j. », C•"�1� ,":�?- , �'J •'Tm... �a- .� ,k ;}. ,rR,p4 "e°C. r,.,✓ .�q �`u,,.a,^+a:.F {I _� "n. YkLW S 1a � (F I � UPS" rxc�h�,•�Pe� ,�`��5�d,� 2£ +ei��t �� "��,�. a. �e'S��7:r,��x��: .o � ;�ff ! ��, �, �}��'?•i,�..q�s_ � 1 j �i,. R '�,�`,"e��'�-•r�•..€��"f, `aVi�"'� ':.1 1�tJ'",��`, ..1:4 a� d_ '��' +b�` �`� +� i�� ' f .,! �� a "Y.,- jr "'y�ti• Qi7 + ';o k. R �'.T�t .,j}i�t%��,`a'N..: ,.,�s� �.�„ '�'T•r.` .-. 'L ��t� ��'rt�'1 •P t_4.i �' a'i� �tra ' � �� r�r��,[��`'�,r�� .1 �� '+7r a.M#. (may✓�: ��'� # S�"l ��x � en � ris ,•. .rp.,r, r � _ �� _.�,�k,r"�' f.,`J.�%• �' � _ f��?��t'� . .t c I j ` ,• ,. . ice, +o�*! °� '`i 'J s. ',. T .f .�akr" y' f, 1t4 'T° - �:`i" •i } 7Y �,t' �„ b s'F'j+,�, p f.F+' f- ,1,• �j ' r � 00 ° .0 Or of o or oa p o o vr�'at�C\,ti: 't 'ri",j�`��::�..�!J•. :'t'y � �;a � — --- l..��•rt<�:5• •t""_"t',} ! ,'� ��' � a��i R '^� �, O �.�e .} I 'ji I.,, ./ ., .'�.7.1;7 tl; pLt"?�1�r �••. .�r !!--�� • �i" � '1�y!=` •� oI, '�'� � _salt Ir 'f i a r {J.;, ti'. 4 �{P �� ».-:�� r �r a:p �'��tif�. r`;2...' 1 C�', 1 1 � j'i��. i —".y,., �• _ �•`',,;h , �', Y',.Aw�S�`,r• .� s,;,.>... �.<4 £ I a1 x�t(C+�r ..,- ..✓:". t yx<< ��J .{' � L..C�r�J }.,�( 1°�� +. `W'"F;,�Y•'i" d �^��.�� 'v Q ❑ ❑.��❑ � I �fz'� '�Q�t � .. s��•��iT-t��"��,r� - �1 : 1�4 r' 6 ��jj{�(��;'�'f.,�l .� �� sSr"�•f"�¢).. n4,�a. `,u"'�'",'�.-�.'� '.�"`1 �� I I "��S! J }f�i � . =+��4. .;��a l�li'�` ��!rf� ""+-:��.�1,1� �•• ;4a�+,\�./p/`//.�({ ! ,afi)y.y.- r F>5:t i' Ya,x 1. 't a Z i "" 1 i i t` .'1� 1 -,,,.` a c`•m.:t :T\;� 5 _! �w��l��'''."�j �l�� b•'��J � �`` i i'a� rr" ro ' 1:� �,� t ,r,, �., � : �1'b a_�. flfi s%C.�u �� . � ,� i �s�.,��,y�4� .4,,ggt k � �$ e, 1 _ 1. r} J 11�1 _ r 'f�"�•F !� ��.`��=• ;}f^�� :�� , ` 34�.,A"� ,� a h'� �; � .; >,. - — fa[ t ✓j 1 'r fF;��;c?',i rryd i •'r= �'b � .lus, ..�t<'`i � d t c.Ly.. �. r3 I,� _ �, + , f jJ s�_ � `r��_f _�_, b .1 ��'^�`!.'-Y bfSYSC"�a, i. ,� , C,r ,+S L, S� � !, y.a�. �; b �'r �� .� � ,�, �I`• C, ,�S�� ')J�1,�:'��"'��.�"t t ...�., •='�' i��11� � �.•r, ,t- � F'.�a, �'�-':,«`" y� 'sa� �•ir4.,r4 ti r��"� ,��. e t{ , 3 °•�'�`r Y" �L:z�i:,'. r Yd'r ;.• - {'+}� '�"y}.,`�r3�YA�� 44 ,y,• ��ea�td �'.�a P.+'•+." •,^ "' ,w-�`a� f ir[ ' ♦`� 4!" �( �-:�,`1 l��fi a• � a 1 {r'� '•,.y�?�` �„ !,}s.3� ''ki°"E r,. ✓=��,,p�-• ,� ^y !� �`� a, cif",P1 -x L+ TIN L'4.a ..aTP <ir 4t�-Y.�� s, �, i�t7 tr�n•"ta`.: �f#�y�.e�' t� Y ..t. It'�l'r',��y i"r•`?_,��,,�.y .ro'; t.�' ..f+•T�r .. OW Estmimated Costs Estimated Proj ect Costs - - Construction Costs Gross Building Area 451920 SF $1315873000 Site Costs Allowance $110701000 Parking Utilities (withi:n 5`) Site Improvements Landscape Subtotal Preliminary Construction Costs $1416577000 Estimated Project Costs Soft costs Furnishings, Fixtures and Equipment (FF&E) Professional Fees (Architects,. Engineers, Consultants) Project Management Printing, Testing, Survey,. Permits Expenses CEQA ................................................................................................................................................................................................ Subtotal Soft Costs $374479850 Subtotal Construction Costs & Soft Costs $185104,850 Estimated Project Costs Subtotal Construction Costs & Soft Costs $1796159900 Contingency Design & Construction - 20% $25931 ,400 ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... Subtotal With 20% Contingencies $'21 ,036,250 Escalation 5% for 3 Years $2,2737667 .................................................................................................................................................................................................. ESTIMATE OF TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $2393109000 (rounded) {.1..,. w: _7 ]�� -, moo•.: �' 9 Financial Financial Analysis Total New Cost Recovery Potential Low Average High .................................................................................................................................................................................................. Probable Operating Costs $604,000 $671 ,000 $738,00 Revenue Potential $655,000 $7179000 $779,000 Net Revenue/Subsidy ($83,000) $469000 $1751000 Costs Revenues Current Center Budget $8579838 $416,280 Financial Analysis Overview: New + Current Cost Recovery Low Average High ................................................................................................................................................................................................ Annual Net Revenue Subsidy (after expenses) New Ctr. Net Revenue/Subsidy ($83,000) ($469000) $175,000 Current Center Net Subsidy ($441 ,000) ($4419000) ($441 ,000) Total Net Subsidy ($5247558) ($3955558) ($266,558) 7, 1 1�0" F onceptual , PARKING r - Zl :T,....:_.,t�xl' .!.....«.,..-a., -- -�" " •y�.v Service e■e e e e s■ !.._i"_i..i_` - '—"'?--r..i. - "'-- __ f i ! w �?�<` �' ��:"' �. �z I I I B I f i l cans ,o : ion `fc•z+.:.sr::t"+�°:.+is.;=:'.ra�.'�+..r>�,c::�::a""yv� I I I i 1. 1 I t F I 4 ✓''"�':L�.iiA ��..+^ '9''2 � ':%�:::;-;•A.�>..5.�.;?.s.�;�?:.:C IZesour:.ce� C rater ■ ,S. "n y�.'yy". = '.'�' _ _ _ f�✓^,.�r;?T` +.�;�':;Y.�-+:. //,''� /L rt,.Y go ■ ¢'„'.�, :`rvfJ`,`3 , :';.fldx(.�.i- "±��,�, "£.1/.enVe% vv' -- .�<.v2 ---- \ S l k i i ,G: a!1^ 7 $' : .C, �J,r: . v : . ✓,�3 y.,S:SY ■ b ;.` Teach�cn _ _ _�._;-- --;:- dministratio _ ::' ., , ■ ''�s;.,`,^-`rKZtClle72 ° -I { -i -I ! i -r- -1 4';. ------ -- �P F 4 .A,,f`�� 4 y��✓^'�fi J ~� I i - 1 .�,�V '^,'+Jy. I - f ■ 2 ° - .,","y 3.�`+.r 'mow ■ ^`£'z.. ' `+�,� �;.. `u as' Lr! lE TYQVeIr�''J w IN e ' x^ ! : �- l ♦ 'C �;. r w 3 yam- 'fi u�:: ......................•...�. ..�... ...I. _ ® bb man RMW tip.p ate: C•c„y.,y` ^,",�, �w,.x: �.9Y:""' !.._ `" - Ca e �� ,r "� "llness,-CeINN nter. q;VWm L+'�i"S wi' %,'3a`';'y'�c.�'•, . :.>. � y(�q �'' '..,� "��•,�.. , � �-�-� ':Game,'<;��, ...�, ;� �;�^� Ed CatlO Cen.4-..e ,,s .v-8ri 1-t ":tv.^<T,'.:, i _.i.__.J._ •_.1._:_.i_!_.i_!_.1_!_.1._: :_ .J.__.�s.oa,ws ss>s..,:.: _ �r.^. %. 'vy�., ",:'"��' "(�, �',"' ��1a•v��1' I ? ! i i .:�'=�(��,I:y�,��. s'v'� i I I's � i � I i i I 1 ! I i 1 —n"^%Y';Y - ..i ry +-1 4 i + i {'l', ,.,:� t •,;•Y.•t, !V f + I-{ + $ L-I- .i.;.q_, Y-}-:-#y.,y_+_{...}.r Y-i_•,., . �� .J._� : -.,1....:-.r .N...t..i-1--i._I-.-L._i... !-.A...i..-1....:-.J._.',-.,1._:.J...' °....i_I-.b._I-.1._I...A._i-.A_.: •..:..�._:�� 2i.:?C✓^'^v'r'>.-n�Y?r1, ,.,,, h i f l l i { l i i I i 1 i ! Q i l l l 1 --!"...,,.: i d i a l ! '.�a;.Y„�s•ra s:4s'Y `+.,�' 2%G �COZIZmUIlI` FlQllr"'•. �;:. Fh.y,..i....,.r .g.,i r!..�,..:"' ! -• 1 y.........,...?.. ? 1 .S...a...,..a...i-.i...i..1. i, t, t..l..l_.a..?.....i...a..a,..r..s..!..a..L.A...{...:..E...,_.c.1,< :,v:.�s•i•;Ya;;^S;.v;�..Sc�:�.�r-�"r`�,^'sa�'t:"s,� �,: wq� \f1.'� �u;�(�>�Yµ e£r+ { i I 1 �.I i I i a f •�•t••`••�v•. i 1 I I i_ I B i I i �. 1 +. � % 5: .4:.15 �C'.��".��i�.1..Ll_t 1 1-.: 13_:_J_._J_ .-J .« _ __J. a LS L1_1_1_L1_ � ...J iJ _ __.l._Ll_Ll_L.J_L-1. ^S -iY,C`,'iv G,''�".'--'L;j�:�,'-:✓w::�0.v+,._.5.�r,;Y-,Y + �a' Y,•v,✓� �` �""'y':� j i, i l l { i t I T I i l : I l i l l i l i ! I l i l :l � ! i f { I l l i t ? I $_.� ."t<\\. �,` Kt. x.YY-.T_i T"-i-'T"-i-'r'-1-.7._.,.�._�.�.—�.�.—�l"-"'T._i-.._,-.-'T'-:-'T'I-"Y"-1-"T'-i-"i'-1�.�.-_.l_.•-.l._�.l'—i.�._.T._:_.T._!_l'._I_.T._I_.-!._i_.T._•._.�.__..�.—��,•..";;:a.' '.,>'�^,'_� '+P _.1._:«J._:_.J._L.J.-...1._LJ._.1.._'._.L._t...1._I_.L_L..1._L.3._:'...1...:_J.�L. L.J._i..:l_.L.�{-.1._I...1._I_.1._{_.1.�'-.y'._:� :�5.�+-�s'.y,.,:c �\p%•+i`a v',"-,''T'� � ��}". ._.LJ._S.J_.J....{...l.�i�.8._I_1._1 -{-.•,....! { � `�u:.r v'�'i:.,.v, 'w-�°; '`;�� , C� I i I i i i i f I i i I i j I I I P i i i i i 4 i : i ! ! i��i I i i I i i ! I i i i �'��'U`�.m+..N.�.;i'.?_:.�s'c:,�„s•^�':�+;^' e 1._i_.1.1_.1._L1._1_.1._:.....]_�J._.L..J.—�J._L.J._i..:._.L._L.1._I_.1.-t-1._I_.1._L.1._L.J._.'_`! FZtY�eSS "WE a." 'r.�,";'�'4c;�w. .� :^v. � 3 ��%:.,:+ I I d i I ! I i i i i 1 � 1 „ i i ! i I I i j f ° s:':•f�"�FYei��rs^�'0:.s;�::a,"',,.-.�,.,r, v '-`' ��: :'� '' �."'�.i_:_..I_.:-.;;....t.:_J._,_..i..i..{._i_.i._:._:_.:;.!._!_.,._i....i.. ._€..._i__. .!_..a.__.j __!__;_ L_t_._F,.__1._1._.i._.-s..i._i._:�.,.. _y gl:�" 2"i3.„•?As'�iz�,SH'::iswa.$Y`s"?t�:;r-r"Ske+uy-a`-1 : : ..`v_ ,., 'mow: v 1_.�._:_.y....;_.�....;...q".1...r_.r.r_.r...Y_.,...,_....y........!...; 1_..;._._.1..._'...y._.;...�,..r.1._.!...,�_.p.�_...i_.;...y".;._f_.,._�_. .{_..�..r...r_.�.+ rS_.r_.j...t". �'Z"w •: �� -_,1 -_.•I-.I 1 I 1 _ - i - ..1 c 1. '.,.1..1 1 t. I -I 1 1 I- •__1 ', :�..i....f_1-.i..i-.-i I t 1'I _.s�-1"•e— ,�, ri '=k'„✓~ i i 1 I 1 _ � �s�.�"�.;-C S;>' �v'"" •�., s"' 'e✓£ � ,G' �` + i >•-� , -r-I { + a� 1 l_-. _._i.: :l ;1.__.I E-'i'-i-- - T ! ! i :I t�se�:�'?'�vt�s,;•"..e>w 2:.:�ii;<%w"�'t:,x.:w,b3 .. �_...{..p.�;_.+..._.+._i-..i_ o m-r-.!...w-{.,.i..1' M >ti s - i + { a-� o c+ d_.+..a- 1 s ti' f p_I•.;._j_.+._,_.Y..i_y...a.._.y..-. �. &«� I_ _ __B 9_{ i_i_'_! ._f _1__I ____ _I_ __1 1_i i ! __JA1__ �_._�__Y\_.; r-;I 1 f ! 1�! { i i :_ - 14 �1�!�I : i i-i'7 -I.. I I ] __ -------- kit P TERRACE,. '° fi ,- y` k_ j ins; l sal z� ;a - -®� ' i ate: ,«Ww 4ry s ILJEMI - „ii tiE►ris t s `•,Jr . City of Huntington , Beach New Senior Center , Huntington Beach Senior Center Complex FEASIBILITY STUDY Prepared for The City of Huntington Beach by LPA, Inc. 5161 California Avenue, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 www.lpainc.com (949) 261-1001 TSMG, Inc. 918 Parker Street, Suite A13 Berkeley, CA 94710 www.sportsmgmt.com (510) 849-3090 March 9, 2006 HU@TI@GT0@ B [ A [ H S E@10R [ [ NTE R [ 0 My [ [ X ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, T b�10 o,,,f; C-,,,o n-,,,t-,e---,u t s INTK00U[T|ON .............................................................................................. MARKET ANALYSIS -----------------------------.3 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS --------------------------O SPA[[ yK08KAM -----------------------------J2 F|NAN[|Ai ANALYSIS --------------------------J8 PK0][[T [ODS ------------------------------]9 SITE ANALYSIS -------------------------------31 [ON[[PT PiANN|NG....................................................................................44 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH S E N 10 R CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. TABLES 1. Level of Service by Year ......................................................................................8 11. Comparative Standards........................................................................................9 Ill. Michael E. Rodgers Senior Center Participation................................................10 IV. Probable Operating Costs and Potential Revenue ..............................................17 V. Cost Recovery Potential ......................................................................................18 VI. Opinion of Total Project Costs..............................................................................20 Intmductioti �/\\ H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. t d U In June 2005, the City of Huntington Beach commissioned the architectural firm of LPA, Inc, and TSMG, Inc. a national consulting firm, to study the feasibility of constructing and operating a new senior center for its senior population.The scope of the study included: • Analysis of population demographics • Analysis of trends and identification of developmental needs • Comparative analysis of senior facilities in the region • Identification of the space components • Financial analysis for the operation of new facilities • Development of project costs for a new facility • Site analysis and recommendation • Concept plan for the proposed facility • Development of funding strategies This work effort involved the active participation of the public, representatives from the Orange County Council on Aging(COA), and City staff.The consultant team facilitated four public meetings to present an overview of the planning process and gain public input regarding the desired programs, services and spaces. In addition to public workshops, the consultant team worked with staff and representatives of COA to develop the recommended space program, analyze the potential sites, develop project costs for the construction of a facility,and identify the operating expenses and revenue potential from the new spaces.This report summarizes the findings and recommendations. 2 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. Intr r .ldu it0;011 The City of Huntington Beach is a vibrant community offering residents an outstanding quality of life with its beautiful coastal setting, temperate climate, and high quality of community services.The City prides itself on the services it provides the 33,000 senior adults living in Huntington Beach. Since thel970's Huntington Beach has been a leader in senior services in Orange County. However, the level of service the current senior center provides will not be able to keep up with the anticipated population growth due to a deficiency in facilities to serve the needs of this population. The City of Huntington Beach is experiencing rapid growth in its senior population.According to U.S. Census data, seniors represented 16.7%of the City's population in 2005 and will represent an estimated 17.8%by 2010. The California Department of Finance projected that the number of seniors in Huntington Beach will increase by 64%within a fifteen year period from 2005 to 2020. Between the years 1994 and 2004, the program participation levels for senior services in Huntington Beach has nearly doubled.Since the 1970's, the City has been committed to providing excellent services to its seniors, however the rapid rate of growth of this group along with their non-traditional interests and needs have provided the impetus for the City to evaluate its current programs and facilities. The City has provided high-quality community-based programs for social support, health promotion, and physical activity for seniors at the Michael E. Rodgers Seniors'Center. It has played a vital role in providing opportunities for socialization,volunteer development, information and referral,advocacy, education, outreach, nutritional assistance,and physical activities. For many years, it has served the City well,but it is now undersized and at the end of its useful life. With a new and larger facility, the City of Huntington Beach will continue to play a prominent role in the lives of its adult population with both traditional and contemporary programming.Today's seniors and the baby-boomer seniors behind them are healthier,work longer,and desire more social involvement than the generations of seniors before them.The general desire is for an interesting and active lifestyle.A state-of-the art facility will create an opportunity for the City to maintain a leadership role in innovative senior programming and to develop a new standard for facility design, programming, and services.The City of Huntington Beach will serve as a model for other communities to follow as their own senior populations inevitably grow. Market Analys is ................................................................................ © \ H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. M,/tir'"urki-it, Aniatlyls' e' OVERVIEW The market analysis defines the service area for the Huntington Beach Senior Center, reports the demographics of its adult residents, and analyzes national trends to assess the needs and interests of the senior adult population. SERVICE AREA The primary service area is defined as the City of Huntington Beach. ° DEMOGRAPHICS Senior adults 60 years of age and over represent 16.7%of the total population estimated for 2005, compared to the State of California average of 14.9 percent and the national average of 12.4 percent.According to California Department of Finance U.S. Census projections, the Huntington Beach senior population is projected to increase from 32,670 in 2005 to 53,600 in 2020.This 64 percent increase in seniors is considerably higher than the projected 52 percent increase in seniors nationally and the projected 59 percent increase in seniors in California.This growth in seniors indicates that there will -- ,�,_��_ . be a significantly higher demand `' � ; ; for senior services in the future. In " tT¢ addition to social services, there � will be an increase demand for fitness, health and wellness activities. National trends indicate that older adults are increasingly demanding recreational facilities and programs, especially fitness activities and enrichment classes. Baby boomers (persons born from 1946 to 1964) have demonstrated an interest in maintaining their health and a high quality of life. Health and exercise campaigns have successfully targeted this population to promote active lifestyles, healthy diets, and overall preventative care. 3 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. mar,-,i J Anal iris: NATIONAL AGING TRENDS AND ATTITUDES The explosive growth in the senior population is due to the aging of the baby boom generation, as well as the increase in the life expectancy of all Americans. The age, education, living situations, health and socio-economic condition of the senior population are changing with the population increase of the baby boomers.With these changes, traditional concepts of age, fitness interests and retirement and work expectations have changed. Concept of Age r Today's seniors have a youthful self concept.- *63 percent of baby boomers feel younger than they are ®Workers do not feel older until at least 60 1 m Seniors are not afraid of aging and � - expect to live longer ® Feelingyounger is about general y g g attitude,good health and staying in ". shape Sources: "Baby Boomers Envision Retirement Il-Key Findings:Survey of Baby Boomers' Expectations for Retirement,"AARP, 2004 "Work'Ireuds:Americans'Attitudes About Work.Employers.and Government," The State University of New Jersey&The University of Connecticut, 2004 Fitness Interests Today's seniors plan to exercise regularly., ® Adults 55 and older are the fastest growing health club group ® Insurers prefer paying for health not disease 42, ® 54 percent of baby boomers expect to exercise regularly 10,- to retirement 25 percent of fitness room users are over 55 0 Adults 45 and older represent 51 percent of personal . training clientele Sources: "Baby Boomers Envision Retirement II-Key Findings:Survey of Baby Boomers' Expectations for Retirement,"AARP, 2004 "The Baby`Boom'Market: Older Adults,"Colin Milner.Club Business International, June 2005 4 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX ................................................................................. Retirement and Work Expectations A majority of seniors plan to continue to work or volunteer, while still committing to fitness and special interests: Seniors agree that they will have more time for recreation and exercise and will pursue special interests and hobbies during retirement _,.n�:: r• Baby boomers expect to have better health than past generations in their retirement "` • 70 percent of American workers plan to continue working p p g full or part-time and another 14 percent plan to work _ as volunteers Rates of self-employment rise with age Those 50 and older are 25 percent of the workforce and 40 percent of all self-employed workers • 16.4 percent of those aged 50+are self-employed • One in Three of these people began self-employment after age 50 • Phase retirement is increasing Sources: "Baby Boomers Envision Retirement lI-Key Findings:Survey of Baby Boomers' Expectations for Retirement."AARP, 2004 "Work Trends:Americans'Attitudes About Work,Employers,and Government,"The State University of New Jersey&The University of Connecticut. 2004 "Self-Employment and the 50+Population,"Lynn Karoly&Julie Zissimopoulos,Rand, March 2004 "Attitudes of Individuals 50 and Older Toward Phased Retirement,"AARP, 2005 Social Connection Needs Seniors value both their independence and opportunities for socialization: • Create easy accessibility to meet others t, • Provide activities to share common interests u�4 • Help seniors fight depression and reduce fear of being alone • Eliminate difficulty in finding a companion Sources: t "Lifestyles,Dating and Romance:A Study of Midlife Singles," AARP, 2003 "The Divorce Experience:A Study of Divorce at Midlife and Beyond,,,AARP, 2004 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. Mj 11,,,_r-u r U_ lisf Health and Wellness Needs Health planning will play an increasingly important role in the lives of today's seniors. Making Health and Wellness programs accessible should be a major component of senior centers: • Provide prescription and supplement education and dispensing • Have offices for visiting healthcare professionals and services • Offer diagnostic testing, screening,wellness monitoring, and an online virtual doctor's office Sources: "Viewpoints: Loohimg at the Future for Older Adults,"Patricia Ryan.The Journal on Active Aging,March/April 2004 "Baby Boomers Envision Retirement lI-Key Findings: Survey of Baby Boomers'Expectations for Retirement," Y AARP,2004 To better serve the adult population the "new generation" senior center must itself be a multi- . � 9 �,,•,�� generational center providing services along a 40-year continuum—from 60 years to 100 years.With each stage of life, there are unique developmental needs and diverse interests not always related to age. The City is beginning to experience the"age wave"of baby boomers turning 60 this year and faces the challenge of meeting the needs of this population, as well as the current large population of senior adults.The"new model" for the design and programming of a senior center is evolving and being defined.The best model does not yet exist. _- - kvk A state-of-the-art senior center must respond to the changing needs of the population, provide . = non-traditional services r a delivered in new ways, and provide spaces that are both appropriate for their intended use and adaptable to inevitable > �- change. 6 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. XT Ml- , a P,ki-c-,-,t An-,a-I,, S'I"S"' Listed below are examples of the types of spaces and programs that are responsive to the trends and needs of older adults living in the City of Huntington Beach: • Spaces and activities that promote socialization • Activities designed to provide opportunities to meet new people -Mates -Travel partners People to share special interests i -Companions • Activities and support for working older adults -Technology -Business center - Meeting space • Classrooms and classes to support a wide range of interests - Languages -Cooking Travel -Arts • Spaces and programs to promote health and wellness ' -Fitness -Nutrition - Exercise • Access and integration of technology - Distance learning - Movies E-books k..v Music • Program offerings throughout the day and evening Y; -Schedules for older working adults ® Access to social services, medical services, and community resources 7 Comparative Analysis ................................................................................ H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. _�m l + + ,- 'd11 j V. A k!6`I�'.J5yp - The consultant team assisted the City with the identification of the changing characteristics of their senior population and how those changes will impact senior services and the facilities needed to respond to the changing senior adult population. This also included a study of senior facilities in the area for the purpose of comparing participation levels, service levels, and program offerings to identify best practices. One means of analyzing the level of service is to compare service levels of nearby communities. This comparison examined the provision of dedicated building space for senior programs, services,activities, and drop-in use. Related to the availability of space, and the type of space provided, is the number of participations.The consultant team surveyed five cities and compared facilities and participation to the City of Huntington Beach.The five communities include the cities: (1) Cerritos, (2) Costa Mesa, (3) Fountain Valley, (4) Irvine,and (5)Westminster. SERVICE LEVELS The 14,505 square foot Michael E. Rodgers Senior Center began operating in 1975.The 1970 US Census reported the City's population of adults 60 years and older to be 6,887. Using the 1970 census figure, the level of service was 10,531 square feet per 5,000 senior population when the Center opened. In 2005 there has been 79 percent decline in the service level to 2,200 square feet per 5,000.Without increases in square footage, the level of service is expected to decline to 1,354 square feet by the year 2020. Table I.Level of Service by Year w 1970 2005 2020 itTotal City Population 60+* 6,887 32,670 53,579 Total Square Footage 14,505 SF 14,505 SF 14,505 SF Level of Service per 5,000 10,531 SF 2,220 SF 1,354 SF I * PopulaIion Numbers courtesy US Census and Applied Geographic,Solutions This level of service is significantly below the levels offered in neighboring communities. Despite the higher service levels in other communities, most report that existing facilities are undersized to meet the current demand for senior programming.As demonstrated by Table II on the next page, although Huntington Beach has the one of the highest percentages of seniors aged 60 and over, it lacks the higher levels of service that the other facilities maintain. Huntington Beach offers only a quarter of the level of service that Irvine offers and only 13 percent of the level of service that Cerritos provides. Huntington Beach offers between 30 and 37 percent of the level of service that Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa,and Westminster provide. Compared to other facilities in the region, Huntington Beach provides the lowest level of service to its senior residents. 8 HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER Table 11.Comparative Standards 7 het V13 Z '111111 0- Y., 'roial City Population,2005* 196,0117 53,916 155,82:3 58,148 111,355 94,139 Adults 60+,2005* 32,670 8,349 18,11 G 10,682 14,425 15.638 (h)ol-folal Population 16.7% 15.5% 11.6% 18.1% 13.0% 16.6% Age 60+ Number of Centers 1 1 2 1 1 2 Michael E.Rodgers Senior Cerritos Senior Center at,['at Lakeview:22,000 sr Fountain Valley Senior Center: Costa Mesa Senior Center: Westminster Senior Centel,: 'rota)Square Footage Center:14,505 sf Nixon Park:27,550 sf Rancho: 11,000 sf 16,000 sf 20,000 sf 12,700 sf Abrazar:6,000 Sf Existing Level of Service per 5,000 Residents 2,220 sf 16,499 sf 9,108 sf 7,489 sf 6.932 sf 5,()79 sf Age 00+ Percentage of Cily's Level of Service that llunLington Beach - 13% 25% 30% 32% 37% Offers Number of Visits Weekly 3,000 2,219 3,775 1,800 2,100*** 2,000 at Westminster only Adults 00+ 36,000 9,503 21,872 12,377 16,731 1B,473 Projected Population,2010* Adults 60+ Projected 53,579 Not Available Not Available Not Available Not,Available Not,Available Population,2020**** 15-20%11unlinglon Beach Notes - This is a New Facility Residents,5-10%Newport At,Capacity At Capacity Beach Residents Close to Capaeily Projections courtesy of Applied Geographic Solutions The City uses:3 offsit(,classrooms This number includes participation from adults aged 50 and over Courtesy of Orange Counly COA HUNTINGTON BEACH SENIOR CENTER Table IL(ompamtive$tandaids Total Gay Population,2005" 196,087 53,946 155,823 _ 58.148 111,355 94,139 Adults60+,2005" 32,670 8,349 18,116 10,6182 11,425 15,638 %of Total Population 16,7% 15.5% 11 fish 181% 13,0% 16 fist Age 60+ Number of Centers 1 1 2 1 1 2 MichaelE Rodgers Senior Cerrbns Semm'Centoral['of Laka,lew.22,000 sf Pounlain Valley Senior Center Costa Mesa senior Center Weslanlnster Sew, Con lee Total Square F'oofage Center 14,505 of Nixon Park"27.,550 sf Ranebo 11,000 sf 16,000 sf 20A00 sf 12 700 sf Abrazar 6,000 sf Rxlsidng Level of Service per 5,000 Residents 2,220 of 16,499 sf 8,108 of 7,489 of 6.932 sf 5.979 sf Age 50+ Percanlago of Clty's Lovol of Servtre that Huntington Bearh _ 13% 25`>fi 30% 32% 37% Offers Number of Visits Weekly 3,000 2.211) 3,775 1,M) 2.400"" 2.000 at Westimnster on ly Adults60+ 36,000 9,503 21,872 12,377 16,731 18,473 Ptnleeled Population,2010" Adults 60+ Projected Population.2020"""" 53.579 Not Available, Not Available, Not Available Not Available Not Available 15 2'09%IIunlanglon Beach Notes This is a New Facility Rrst enls,5-10%Newport At Capacity At Capacity Scach Rosidents Close to Capacity "Pro locti0ns cmmlesy of Aopoe0(i[Ipgl'bphic.Solupons ""The City uses 3 ofrsuc classrooms numbr,r Includes partic,ipation from adults aged 50 and over '•"'Courtesy of Orange Counly COA A HUNTIN6TON BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. ", �c o ar V T qu" -C A nli a P ott" PARTICIPATION LEVELS As the graph below indicates, the attendance level of Huntington Beach's senior center has nearly doubled from 1994 to 2004.The participation figures represent units of service and includes the number of participants at every event and program during the year. The Center operates at capacity for many programs and activities.It is likely that participation would grow with a larger facility offering greater capacity and varied program opportunities. Table III.Michael E.Rodgers Senior(enter Participation i Michael E. Rodgers Senior Center Participation Usage l 120,000 ._ 100,000 0 60,000 � 0 �} 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 �! Year A review of participation numbers of similar senior center facilities in the region (shown on Table II on the previous page) emphasizes this growth.The City of Huntington Beach estimates 600 daily participations for the 5 days per week that the senior center is open.This level of participation is second only to the City of Irvine. However, Huntington Beach has the smallest facility and the largest population of seniors.With a smaller facility, Huntington Beach is able to attract a comparatively large number of visitors. This serves to emphasize the quality and popularity of the services offered at the Center but also shows that the current facility is operating above its capacity.With a large number of unserved seniors and a facility that is already attracting more users than it can comfortably accommodate, it is clear that an increase in space is needed and will foster more growth in the participation levels. Huntington Beach will be able to serve a higher percentage of its senior population and will be comparable to other cities in the region. 10 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. r a the Ana YSI"'s l p FUTURE PARTICIPANTS The senior adult population is changing. Demographic trends in the U.S. indicate a growth of the largest, healthiest, best-educated group of seniors in the nation's history. Senior adults have more discretionary income as a group, and are living longer and enjoying a more active lifestyle in their later years. Societal changes such as the integration of technology into daily life, changes in health care and how those services are delivered,and education about long- term health,wellness and fitness,are all impacting the demand for senior services.Also of importance is the increase in diversity in Huntington Beach. The Asian/Pacific Islander population is expected to increase 126 percent by the year 2020, and the Hispanic population is expected to increase 151 percent. As the senior population increases in size and diversity, the senior center will need to restructure its programs to be responsive to changing needs. It is expected that baby boomers will have higher expectations and interest in consumer, health, fitness and self-help activities.A more ethnically-diverse population also means that a senior center must incorporate culturally- sensitive guidelines and culturally-diverse programs within the center. The new senior center will require an expanded operations model. Of particular importance is funding for staff training about the changing senior population.There must be a commitment to creating, funding, and executing an on-going marketing program to target the changing market. Flexible scheduling of programs and services should also be considered to serve the seniors who continue to work. The proposed spaces for the senior center creates an opportunity to generate additional revenue to partially offset the cost of the larger facilities and to maintain a high service level for the community. For example, the large community hall that will be used by seniors for social activities, the lunch program, dinner dances, etc. can also be a source of revenue for community rentals when not used by the seniors. The addition of fitness space and expanded fitness programs will require additional professional staff to develop and manage these programs;however, there are revenue opportunities associated with these programs, after senior use to partially offset these increased costs. 11 Space Program ................................................................................ vMM�xn -t"',' "MA �M a " ... s �"� H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. �)i,"Paud7l"Pa P-r®r �g-tram The consultant team facilitated public meetings and Council on Aging workshops that included a"virtual tour" of senior centers and identified trends in senior programming and senior center design. Participants were asked to indicate the types of spaces, programs, activities, and services they believed were needed and should be included in the planning for a new center. Participants were also asked to identify the outdoor features and amenities that were important to them. Based upon community input and the demographic and market analysis a listing of desired space components was developed.This list, however, exceeded the amount of funding the COA and staff representatives believed to be achievable and began a process to refine the list. The criteria used to create the preferred space components included identification of: (1) activities and programs that are under-served in the community, (2) spaces that would serve the needs of the greatest number of seniors, (3) multi-use space programming opportunities to achieve cost recovery objectives to offset operating expenses.The recommended space program includes: Activity Spaces Building Support Group Exercise Room Reception Desk Fitness Room Administrative Offices Multi-use Dance Studio Maintenance/Storage/Workshop Custodial Storage/Office Community Spaces Social Lounge Outdoor Spaces Cyber Cafe Walking Paths and trails Community Hall Bocce Courts Kitchen Horseshoes Meals to Home/Kitchen Outdoor Area for Fitness Classes Classroom Garden Center Game Room Resource Office Spaces Education Spaces COA Computer/Technology Room Consultation/Health Services Arts and Craft Studio Social Work and Case Classrooms/Meeting Room Management Visiting Services Trips and Travel A detailed list of each space component and the recommended square footage follows. 12 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. �.,pace, P- ,,r0,,g, ,irN7U H U N T I N G T O N B E A C H S E N I O R C E N T E R ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... Space Program A. Building Support Space NASF A.01 Entry/Lobby/Social Lounge 1,000 A.02 Cafe 300 Ii A.03 General Building Storage 200 A.04 Restrooms (2 @ 150sf) 300 A.05 Maintenance/Storage 1 Workshop 400 A.06 Custodial Office 100 F A.07 Custodial Storage 200 Subtotal Building Support Spaces 2,500 j B.Administration B.01 Supervisor's Office 180 } B.02 Coordinator Office- Recreation 120 hr B.03 Coordinator Office-Volunteers 120 ? 8.04 Marketing Office 160 p B.05 Administrative Assistant. 100 B.06 Workstations (4 @ 80sf) 320 B.07 Maintenance Technician Office 100 B.08 Workroom/Office Supply Storage (Main Workroom) 300 B.09 Breakroom 240 E B.10 File Archives 100 i B.11 Staff Restroom 2 170 Subtotal Administration Spaces 1,910 ° iI j C. Resource Center a C.01 Reception I Waiting Area 300 <! C.02 Case Worker Offices (3 @ 120sf, 1@ 160sf) 520 C.03 Visiting Services/COA Offices (3 @ 120sf) 360 C.04 Consultation/Meeting Rooms for 4-6 200 C.05 Consultation/Meeting Rooms for 10-15 300 i C.06 Trips and Travel Resource Area 200 C.07 Travel Office (seating for 4) 150 r Subtotal Resource Center 2,030 13 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................>.............................................,.................. P a,c c--,, Pr,rk.o.g r a m H U N T I N G T 0 N B E A C H S E N I O R C E N T E R ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... ;t Space Program continued it I, D. Education Center NASF ! ,s D.01 Arts&Crafts Room 1,000 II 1� D.02 Arts&Crafts Room Storage 400 Ii D.03 Computer Room 600 D.04 Classroom/Meeting Room 41 11200 ; I D.05 Classroom/Meeting #1 Storage 200 ( D.06 Classroom/Meeting Room #2 400 D.07 Classroom/Meeting #2 Storage 100 j Subtotal Education Center 3,900f E. Social Center u , II E.01 Social Lounge 1,500 ! E.02 Game Room 1,000 l t E.03 Community Hall/Dining Rm w/platform (Seating for 300) 6,300 E.04 Community Hall/Dining Room Storage 700 s, �i E.05 Dressing Room 200 �j E.06 Kitchen 11000 E.07 Kitchen Service Corridor into Divided Community Hall 1,000 y E.08 Kitchen Restroom 50 I li E.09 Kitchen Pantry 100 ( 1, E.10 Site Nutrition Office 100 E.11 Kitchen: Meals to the Home and Teaching Classroom 800 r !I E.12 Storage 150 E.13 Workstations (2 @ 80sf) 160 �i E.14 Meals to Home Pantry 100 E.15 Kitchen Classroom Storage 60 €I �f E.16 Restrooms- Men 400 1� j E.17 Restrooms-Women 420 Subtotal Social Center 14,040 ' 14 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. pa, c e Pro -r w 4. H U N T I N G T O N B E A C H S E N 1 0 R C E N T E R .............................................................................................................................................................................. Space Program continued F. Fitness&Wellness Center NASF F.01 Fitness Room 4,000 F.02 Fitness and Wellness Coordinator Office 120 F.03 Fitness Assessment and Testing 100 F.04 Fitness Storage 100 s j F.05 Group Exercise Room 2,200 a F.06 Group Exercise Room Storage 350 �l F.07 Dance Room 1,500 n� E F.08 Dance Room Storage 200 =t Subtotal Fitness&Wellness Center 8,570 G. Transportation Center G.01 Transportation Coordinator's Office 120 G.02 Driver's Workstation Area 120 F G.03 Waiting Area (for 5 people) 180 G.04 Dispatcher Area (5 @ 60sf each) 300 is G.05 Storage 300 It Subtotal Transportation Center 1,020 E� Sub Total Net Assignable Area 33,970 'i Circulation, Mechanical, Walls, Etc. Building Spaces (75% efficiency) 11,320 { Total Gross Building Area 45,290 15 Financial Analysis ................................................................................ 43 H} �r 1,� H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. S11 in!,,a n cr-Jal, MJ34 Analys, ' _5 The consultant team conducted a financial analysis for the operation of the new spaces proposed for the senior center. Individual budgets were developed for each space. The expenses and revenues were assumed to be new and in addition to the existing Senior Center budget.The following is a summary of that analysis. The financial analysis identifies the probable costs to operate and maintain the facility identified in the recommended space program.The spaces include a community room,group exercise room, fitness room,arts and crafts room, classrooms, kitchen classroom, and dance studio.The analysis also includes the potential revenue that can be derived from the operation of each individual space.All figures are presented in current 2006 dollars. PROBABLE OPERATING COSTS Operating assumptions used to determine operating costs were developed with the input of City staff. In addition to the existing senior services staff, three new full-time employees are included in the probable operating costs. The recommended staff positions include: (1) marketing coordinator to promote community room and other facility rentals, (2) fitness-wellness coordinator responsible for the programming of the activity classes, and (3) and a building maintenance/custodian to maintain the facility at a high level. These costs are presented in detail in the Financial Analysis and are presented in a range from "low" to"high."Typically, costs incurred in the first few years of operation are at the"low"end of the range because the facilities are new and less expensive to maintain and have yet to reach capacity. Operating expenses are paid from one of two sources: 1) the Center's operating budget, or, 2) the City's General Fund. For purposes of this financial analysis,expenses that are paid from the Center's budget are included in the"Operating Budget." Expenses traditionally paid from the City's budget are not included.A summary of each space's expenses is shown in Table IV on the following page. POTENTIAL REVENUE To develop estimates of the revenue potential for the new facility,a market analysis was completed.This included demographic analysis of the characteristics of the population within the service area, analysis of current users of The Rodgers Senior Center, and an analysis of commercial service providers within the service area. 16 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. e. e"tinancl"A_ AnW','y The revenue potential identified for each new space is based upon a mix of income from the sale of daily passes, facility rentals,programs,classes, and drop-in activities. For the center to achieve its revenue objectives and serve the needs of the community, the program mix must be adaptable and responsive to user interest and demand. There must be a variety of offerings that target each market segment.Actual revenue earned will depend upon the level of programming,a successful marketing program, and the resulting participation by the community. The revenue estimates are believed to be conservative. For example, a number of municipalities report that rental reservations for their community hall space are booked for every weekend for a year in advance.A beautiful community hall with round table seating for 300 guests with a patio and garden located in Huntington Beach would be in very high demand.Also,changes in managed health care have resulted in a growing number of programs in which insurance companies will pay for fitness and wellness programs for senior adults. One program, available through Pacific Care in Southern California, is"Silver Sneakers". In addition to providing vital programs for the adult community, the Silver Sneakers program could generate revenues in excess of$100,000 for the senior center. Table IV.Probable Operating(osts and Potential Revenue H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER .......................................................... ij SUMMARY Probable Operating Costs Pot6ntial Revenue i Low High Low High ........................................................................................................................... .................................................................... it Community Hall $186,000 $221,000 1 $196,000 $229,000 Ej Group Exercise Room $93,000 $113,000 $82,000 $98,000 I �! jl Fitness Room $90,000 $107,000 $103,000 $113,000 ,! I; Arts&Crafts Room $59,000 $73,000 $70,000 $85,000 I. E, l; Classrooms $58,000 $74,000 $66,000 $83,000 f` Kitchen Classroom $54,000 $67,000 $59,000 $70,000 ;I Dance Room $64,000 $83,000 $79,000 $101,000 �l Total New $604,000 $738,000 $655,000 $779,000I h t, 17 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. ma 1, ,a!! r4l sip COST RECOVERY POTENTIAL The tables below detail two scenarios of cost recovery potential. "High" cost recovery is determined by subtracting the lowest probable operating expenses from the highest potential revenue. "Low" is determined by subtracting the highest probable expenses from the lowest potential revenue. "Average" cost recovery is determined by subtracting the average probable expenses from the average potential revenue. In the opinion of the consultant team, the"average" cost recovery is what is likely to occur after two to three years of operation. The first table shows the probable operating expenses and revenues to be expected from the new spaces. Based on this first analysis,the expected average net revenue of the new spaces and that which will be added by building this new facility will be $46,000. The second combines those figures with the existing budget. The average net subsidy with the existing budget included is expected to be $395,558. This is still far better than the current $441,000 net subsidy of the existing facility. Table V.(ost Recovery Potential Total New Cost Recovery Potential ..................................................................................................Low.....................Average....................Hlgh................. Probable Operating Costs $604,000 $671,000 $738,000 I Revenue Potential $655,000 $717,000 $779,000 Net Revenue/Subsidy ($83,000) $46,000 $175,000 Current Center Budget Costs Revenues $857,838 $416,280 OVERVIEW: New + Current Cost Recovery ..................................................................................................Low.....................Average....................High i Annual Net Revenue/Subsidy (after expenses) i j New Center Net Revenue/Subsidy ($83,000) $46,000 $175,000 Current Center Net Subsidy ($441,000) ($441,000) ($441,000) **Total Net Subsidy ($524,558) ($395,558) ($266,558) ** Note: Based on similar expanded facilities, it is anticipated that there will be a three-year ramp up to realize full revenue projections 18 Project Costs ................................................................................ - z H U N T I N 6 T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX ................................................<................................. r t COiot-s The consultant team developed the project cost estimates for the proposed senior center. Table VI illustrates the breakdown of these costs. The construction costs estimate the cost of the actual built structures. The site costs provide allowances for parking, landscape and outdoor amenities, such as courtyards and gardens. At this time site utilities and off-site improvements have been excluded from the estimate until additional due diligence can be performed on the selected site(s). These costs when added together reflect the preliminary construction cost of the new senior center. The soft costs are the professional fees and tests necessary for completion of the project, as well as the budget for furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E). The City of Huntington Beach has also included project management fees. The project hard costs and soft costs represent the total construction price for the new senior center. During this feasibility/programming phase, it is critical to include a design and construction contingency. This allowance is provided to accommodate changes made to the project through its completion. As the documents get more refined, the contingency, which is a buffer against the unknown, will be reduced. In addition to these allowances, a line item has been included to account for escalation. The current bid market has ben influenced by unprecedented cost spikes resulting from recent market volatility, fuel costs, etc. This percentage attempts to define an appropriate amount for the project to hold until the midpoint of construction. Pricing is a determination of fair market value for the construction of this project. It is not a prediction of low bid. Since LPA, Inc. and TSMG, Inc. have no control over the cost of labor, material, equipment, or over the contractor's method of determining prices, or over the competitive bidding or market conditions at the time of bid, the statement of probable construction cost is based on industry practice, professional experience and qualifications and represents LPA, Inc.'s best judgment. However, LPA, Inc. cannot and does not guarantee that the proposals, bids or the construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost. The summary of the opinion of project costs is given in Table VI. 19 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. oj0 t Cs { ; r Table VI.Opinion of Total Project(osts Construction Costs Net Building Area $300/SF 33,970 SF $10,191,000 ` 1� il Grossing Factor (75% Efficiency) $300/SF 11,320 SF $3,396,000 I r, Subtotal Gross Building Area 45,290 SF $13,587,000 i Site Costs Allowance $1,070,000 Parking Utilities within 5' of Building Perimeter ° Landscape M1� Subtotal Preliminary Construction Costs $14,657,000 Soft Costs E Architect, A/E,Acoustic, Recreation, AV Consultant Fees (9%) $1,319,000 Printing, Testing, Survey, Permits Expenses (3.5%) $513,000 q FF&E Allowance (5%) $733,000 CEQA $100,000 legal $50,000 Project Management (5%) _ $732,850 Subtotal Soft Costs $3,447,850 i� fy Subtotal Construction Costs & Soft Costs $18,104,850 Contingency _ Design &Construction _ $2,931,400 E Subtotal with 20% Contingencies $21,036,250 �y Escalation 5% for 3 Years $2,273,667 a, OPINION OF TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $23,309,917 20 Site Analysis ................................................................................ 3 q m f m 3 WARNER ' SLATER TAIe ERT i y-- S ' cAREIEI. r * .tti "'�' �� i i j _ INDIANAPOLIS ATLANTA CON- H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX ................................................................................. s� nitt- A critical element of the feasibility process is determining a potential site for the new senior center.As a part of our review process we examined nine potential locations.The potential sites were provided by City staff and were identified during public workshops as sites that could provide five acres of usable land.This acreage accommodates a one-story building, required parking as well as `Seniors on the Go'transportation vehicles, landscape, and site amenities such as courtyards and gardens. Sites such as the existing Michael E. Rodger's Senior Center,were not excluded if they were smaller, however, it was recognized they would present additional complexity during development. Twenty-four criteria were established in five categories to evaluate the nine locations.The categories included site characteristics,access, special conditions, economic conditions, and pertinent data. Each criteria was given a value ranging from 1 to 5.With input from City staff and the Council on Aging committee,we established priorities for each of these criteria on a scale from 1 to 3 to`weight'each score.The product of these values established the total weighted score for each site, creating a ranked evaluation system.As a result of this process, the preferred location for the new senior center is Site 1, located within Central Park at Talbert.The second highest score was Site 2, located within Central Park at the corner of Goldenwest and Ellis. Our evaluations have been limited to only the visual assessment of the sites due to inadequate reports and documentation available at this time. Soil conditions, site encumbrances, underground utilities and easements,and potential use agreements are unknown for all nine sites and were not able to be considered in this evaluation.As a result of the weighted score, the next step in evaluating the final building location would be to hire civil and geotechnical engineers to perform due diligence on the preferred site to ensure its viability. At the conclusion of that scope of work,a final site recommendation could be confirmed. A map showing each potential site is given on the next page. It is followed by summaries of each site including maps, pictures and pros and cons of each site. 21 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. site Ana"is, Lu o J , (r p N. Q LN Q J �, a' OL: O; pl x M x z N O'LJLJ CD Z! _ d. CD a W W' Q! =3 of Q cn1 LO z m z, �i m m, w Site 1 - _, --- - - -- _. ... . Goldenwest and Talbert 0 5 ' 0 Site 2 Goldenwest and Ellis - - - - - - - -- - 1 , 1 Site 3A 1 1 WARNER Kettler School ---- ------ - ---- -_ I ; I Site 3B 1--------r---- ---a------ ----;- _ SLATER Kettler, Edison Park 1 L 1 5 1 -aos TALBERT -+ Site 4 1- of 1 LeBard Park & School 21 ELus . . I --------- - .- .._._. Site 5 r, GARFIELD OC Transfer Station ------ --- ---~ - _, ' ;, l Site 6 f i ' j YORKTOWN . 1 7-_-- Rodgers Senior Center * r - -� ,J, 6 ��1 i i i ADAMS Site 7A Bartlett Park, Adams 4 INDIANAPOL Site 7B °� � - Bartlett Park, Yorktown �� 2�F I ' 3 - _ ATLANTA 1 - ----?.-.- -1-- ------ !� LEGEND - il- �lz HAMILTON 8LANE ---- 6 LANE ' 4 LANE '4 1111 iI ttg-�l PARK LAND PACIFIC CONTEXT HIGHWAY - OCEAN ±� r$Cn 177 FREEWAY '`"� '� t� NOT TO SCALE GIVICCENTER d al i _ - y M�F4 • 22 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX ......>..............................................................—.......... Site 1 - Goldenwest & Talbert Site 1 is located within Central Park at the south west corner of Goldenwest and 8 Talbert. The five acre site would be south of the existing nature center,and north w..aa of the Disc Golf recreational area. ------ ----- ---- „>.E. Vehicular access could be signalized at the intersection that 1 P ours with the Sports , l..,E r'- ------- --- �� Park and Library,creating a collection of --------- civic uses in this region of the city.This t d o... si e is owned by the city. _ - FW ... I�l\ �= CONTEXT ¢l TV .r . t Yz ; .4 . : a,�• 23 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. Site, Ana",Js Site 1 - Goldenwest & Talbert HUNTINGTON PARK *SHIPLEY'S °nNATURE GE IT ER, ° o, jLIBRARY a � s a � e 0m TALBERT _- u, V r'__-_.__ US STOP d .. EESSTAURANT C*TOT° LOT DISK GOLF PARK, c ` i tiLAKE NUNTIN6TON LEGEND H ACCESESS PEDTRIAN PATH EOGE �F NODE PARKLAND SITE 1 0 PHOTOGRAPH NUMBER +✓»� BRIDGE STEPS 3, POWER LINES V 24 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX ......................................................................<........... SITE I CONCLUSIONS Pros: Cons: • Accommodates parking,building program, exterior •Requires Charter Section 612 (Measure C)vote program, and future program expansion • Per FEMAs map#06059CO234H, site is located within • On-site bus stop Zone X"This area protected from the 1%chance flood by levee, dike, or other structure subject to possible • Views around site are all pleasant failure during larger floods" • Primarily quiet • Safety driving concern:Slow drivers turning into fast driving street, Golden West(6 lane street) •Allows 2 curb cuts on the east side only(Golden West Street), easy vehicular and pedestrian circulation, and • No significant vegetation easy fire truck access •Topography has an underlying order brought about by • City-owned property surface water or human intervention, soil is very soft • Although site is not leveled with the street(10'to 15' • Master plan currently includes passive park at this drop) contours at site are spread out,topography is location primarily flat, requires some fill • Somewhat developed site • Centrally located within the City, easy to find, safe area • Would benefit from Central Park amenities, such as proximity to Huntington Lake,city Library, sports park across the street, trees, open turf, pedestrian path near the lake, Disk Park, Restaurant by the Lake, etc. • Although nature center is to the north, there is no room for conflict,because not much habitat would be near the street • Site adjacent to compatible uses 25 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. n,- 0,t,-,,e i �aliys:J s5 w Site 2 - Goldenwest & Ellis Site two is located within Central Park at the north west corner of Ellis and Goldenwest.A five acre site would be located to complement the master plan waw Ew development in this currently undeveloped area of the park.This site is b owned __ _ y the city. ___ ��,= i .o..s d�`,e CCONTTE%T'I_ e 71 Nk- R. � T mmS b; • rah+ � k��`�7 ,'�y X`f:.. �»�"� t, "" — �. 26 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. • O, t" s I �" .. toAna S Site 2 - Goldenwest & Ellis ,ref *HUNT]NGTON PARK n, STABLES r� �.. ;- j ♦50 j Str,:;, 1 - -1 gSNELY.k [ t~ §MIUIERa 1 r55- LAKE; OIL DRIVING AREA I 1 I I u I 1 1 1 L.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..J ELLIS ST *BUS _- STOP A LEGEND ACCESS PEDESTRIAN PATH E ie EDGE NODE PARKLAND SITE 2 PHOTOGRAPH NUMBER mm BRIDGE •' Iw 1 STEPS _ �6 1 POWER LINES 27 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. w SITE 2 CONCLUSIONS Pros: Cons: •Accommodates parking,building program,exterior • Requires Charter Section 612 (Measure C)vote program, and future program expansion • Master plan currently includes therapeutic riding center, •Allows 2 curb cuts on either east side (Golden West) or parking, tot lot, restroom, and open turf amenities; south side (Ellis), easy vehicular and pedestrian master plan would have to be modified circulation,and easy fire truck access • Safety driving concern:Slow drivers turning into very • City owned property fast driving streets, i.e. Golden West and Ellis • Contours are spread out evenly, site is primarily flat • No significant vegetation • Somewhat developed site •Views around site are not all pleasant, some oil drilling machines to the west, and residential homes to the east • Centrally located within the city, easy to find, safe area • Primarily loud and busy • Per FEMAs map site is out of the flood area • Central Park amenities, such as proximity to Huntington • Bus stop across the street Lake, Library, and sports park, are not as proximate from this site. • Possible mitigation issues 28 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .....................<............................................................ Analysi"s Site 3A& 3B - Kettler School and Edison Park . Site three is located at Kettler School. Given the significant amount of acreage, the option exists to develop either the main campus area, identified as site 3A, wAh.Ea or the school play fields adjacent to Edison Park, identified as site A This --_ m s site is not currently owned by the city. - p .- XDNTTE%T_' V #: 29 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. %fie Aral r< k `Site 3A& 3B - Kettler School and Edison Park. ii Q DorssET De"— 3 C i t i SITE 3A j f t � j I 41 AC '•i 4. BUS y � STOP I TILLWELI OR l SAINT;AUG USTINE N_ SITE 36. �. _ _ _ i i I� 1 DSISON IGH 3]ff I CoM '/ TPj CNDOL CENTER IRE HAMILTON AVE� LEGEND ACCESS PEDESTRIAN PATH EDGE �F NODE PARR LAND 7ffi SITE 3A &3B Q PHOTOGRAPH NUMBER T RRIME 0 10'200' a0LY n STEPS POWER LINES 30 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. I SITE 3A & 3B CONCLUSIONS Pros: Cons: •Accommodates parking,building program, exterior •The 3A site has two existing curb cuts on Dorsett Drive, program, and future program expansion but access and vehicular circulation is through established residential neighborhoods which is less •Views around site are all pleasant desirable. • Primarily quiet •Access from Stilwell Drive (off Magnolia) is most appropriate,but would require reconfiguration of the •Site is flat and level with the street existing park to get access to the 3B site. • Somewhat developed site •Access to site is through residential streets •Would benefit from proximity to Edison Park and Fire • Development of the 3A site will require demolition of Station on Magnolia and Hamilton buildings • Site is adjacent to compatible park uses • Per FEMAs map site is located within Zone X"This area protected from the 1%chance flood by levee, dike,or • Significant vegetation and mature trees other structure subject to possible failure during larger floods" • Bus stop on Magnolia, near Site 3B • Not a City owned property • Potential compatibility with Edison Community Center • Location is not central • Surplus school property which the City would be able to purchase under Naylor Act. • City would have to acquire school property • Methane mitigation is likely 31 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. a Site 4 - LeBard Park & School Site four is located at LeBard School and Park.The existing acreage is in excess of the desired five acres, allowing the new senior center to be carefully sited based «NEa upon existing recreational uses.This site ____ ________ _--- is not currently owned by the city. { r -- ---- --------------- , s , o * , _,_.-------- >, U--------- CONTEXT 32 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. Sitn Analysi # a Site 4 - LeBard Park & School .Ooz - - ® .®r r oil `! CRAILE7 DR _ «�4a �� • f min BARWICK DR j- *LEBARD SCHOOL ,j ;i 'A n 1 Y a *LEBARD PARK a j a�.�RIOGE';TQ COSTA 1 1 _-CYNTfIIA OR HERCULES 9R <+i 4 ®, `zap R 1 LEGEND a ACCESS PEDESTRIAN PATH EDGE �E NODE PARKLAND SITE 4 PHOTOGRAPH NUMBER »� BRIOGE - STEPS iE -- �, POWER LINES - 33 H U N I I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. sue,nialys SITE 4 CONCLUSIONS Pros: Cons: • City owned property •Access to the site is through an established residential neighborhood •Accommodates parking, building program, exterior program, and future program expansion • Northeast corner of site could be developed for senior center on approximately 3.8 acres (limiting some of the •Views around site are all pleasant potential amenities a 5 acre site permits), allowing the ball fields to remain in place if necessary. The • Primarily quiet adjacency of the ball fields would be less desirable for the Center. •Allows 2 curb cuts on the south residential side (Cynthia Street),has 2 curb cuts on the east residential side • Per FEMAs map#06059CO234H, site is located within (Craimer Lane), easy vehicular and pedestrian Zone X"This area protected from the 1%chance flood circulation,and easy fire truck access by levee, dike, or other structure subject to possible failure during larger floods" • Contours are very spread out, site is level with the street • No bus stop near site • Has existing small parking lot,most site work already exists • Not centrally located •Would benefit Lebard Park • Demolition of existing ball fields or buildings could be required •Adjacent bike and pedestrian path in the river bed to the east • Near power lines at river bed • Mature vegetation • Residential neighborhood 34 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. lAnaly k Site 5 - OC Transfer Station Site five is located at the O.C.Transfer 3 Station property,west of Gothard Street, and south of the existing city Sports Park. I The opportunity exists to enhance this wAwxEa property and integrate it with Central ____ __-----_ ____; a.Ea Park.The site is currently owned by the ------ - ---- --------- County of Orange. .., - NTEXT,I_. y~ f 7 77- s q yk 35 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. b f uA, A n alys.1"","sI Site 5 - OC Transfer Station *Bus -*CITY LIBRARY STOP TALBERTST Q SPORTS PARK ' CONCRETE ------------------- AND 'ASPHALT RECYDLIrvG YAND i ; Q o cs i I L._ .._.._.._._.._.:_____.._.._.._.::._.:_.._..J Ll h .SUl.LY,MIELERI.AKE '"£^ �. ' '#GDTHARD FIRE STATION LEGEND ACCESS PEDESTRIAN PATH EDCE �F NODE PARKLAND SITE 5 � PHOTOGRAPH NUMBER »>� BRIDGE STEPS a POWER LINES 36 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. AnalysS, SITE 5 CONCLUSIONS Pros: Cons: •Accommodates parking, building program,exterior • Per FEMAs map#06059CO234H, site is located within program, and future program expansion Zone X"This area protected from the 1%chance flood by levee, dike, or other structure subject to possible •Allows 2 curb cuts on the east side only(Gothard failure during larger floods" Street), easy vehicular circulation, and easy fire truck •Views around site are not all pleasant some recycling access yard to the north, commercial to the east and south • Site is level with the street, there is some topography considerations at west side • Busy and loud • Except for parking lot, most site work already exists • Site is not adjacent to compatible uses, isolated from other park uses •Would benefit from the Huntington Beach Library, sports park further north, and Gothard's fire station on south • No significant vegetation • Centrally located within the city • Possible mitigation issues • Bus stop near site • County owned property 37 HUNTING10N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. 'V OSite 6 - Rodgers Senior Center Site six is the existing Michael E. Rodgers Senior Center.The site is only half the size required to accommodate the new I senior center space program. But, given the success of the programs offered in this facility, and that the site is owned by TIIIIRI ----------- the city, it certainly warranted site ----- °°FE° analysis study. -' -------- —Tt CONTEXT,! 4 Y 3 �L 1 b 38 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. Slie 1 s y Site 6 - Rodgers Senior Center O2.3 AD et ti O VO ®• O 0 }`" Ts. ®• i9a • 41, • • r • dsd � "�PACIFlt � �: ®• ",OCEANS ,r •® LEGEND F ACCESS PEDESTRIAN PATH t• EDGE �F NODE PARK LAND SITE 6 � PHOTOGRAPH NUMBER >� BRIDGE ` u STEPS -- - ` POWER LINES 39 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................<.......>>...............>....................... S!" SS, Eire: 3 s� vY SITE 6 CONCLUSIONS Pros: Cons: •Seniors are familiar with the site • Site does not accommodate all needed program and/or parking. Site is small (+2.3 ac.), probable two-story •Views around site are all pleasant solution required • Primarily quiet • Chevron donated the land to the City with the condition that it be used for recreational purposes, therefore, if • Has two curb cuts on Pecan Street,easy vehicular and facility were on a different or other site, this property pedestrian circulation, and easy fire truck access could not be sold to raise funds for the new senior center without Chevron's approval •City owned property •An interim senior center, site would have to be •Site is level with the street and generally flat determined to accommodate seniors during construction • Existing parking lot,most site work already exists; • South side of City developed infrastructure • Per FEMAs map#06059CO234H, site is located within •Would benefit from proximity to the beach Zone X"This area protected from the ]%chance flood by levee, dike, or other structure subject to possible • Site adjacent to compatible uses failure during larger floods" • Not very much plant cover, primarily asphalt • Residential neighborhood 40 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. R11 Ann,- , -J. Site 7A& 7B - Bartlett Park,Adams &Yorktown Site seven, Bartlett Park,was brought to our attention in one of the public workshops. Given the requirement for a five acre site, the analysis looked at the south end of the property at Adams, identified as site 7A, and the north end ,.,,E"T r, of the property at Yorktown,identified as site 7B.The Opportunities and Constraints Analysis completed in July %> • ____-_____l-_-._ . !' .°,....... of 1999 by Sapphos Environmental, Inc., -- � identified the bluff top area of the Park 0 as the most appropriate location for any Site 7B - % CONTEXT ..o-• proposed structures.This area was not identified initially as it does not accommodate the desired 5 acres for the Senior Center.The report indicates that a building could be sensitively located to minimize the impact to the surrounding area, but illustrates a 20,000 SF footprint,which at this time would not fully accommodate the desired city space program and would be challenged to fit the required parking without significantly impacting sensitive ~ '� .��•�`°��, ��t �' adjacent areas. Site 7A As 77 Au u f d, 41 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. Site Analys'lls, Site 7A& 7B - Bartlett Park, Adams &Yorktown M GAS LIQUOR STATION* jJF STORE _ YORKTOWN_AVE_ WALGREENS - 1000 s 1 SITE 76 1 I i J _ yet -. - -_ - - -- - - - UTICA_ CHAMBER *KINDERGARTEN � OF COMMERCE m a 'A hoc ;- -- M -SITE 7A! AOA ..MS ST- L.- #BUS STOP CHEVRON* .RESTAURANT - GAS STATION LEGEND ACCESS PEDESTRIAN PATH EDGE CIF NODE PARKLAND SITE 7A & 7B � PHOTOGRAPH NUMBER BRIDGE STEPS POWER LINES r 42 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. A nt, n-Ilys'," i oi__ 1",S SITE ,A &7B CONCLUSIONS Pros: Cons: •Accommodates parking,building program,exterior • Loud and busy program, and future program expansion,with potential two-story building •Views around site are not all pleasant, commercial property on west side, extreme topography to the north • Bus stop on Adams Street (Ravine), and prone to flooding,with native vegetation •Allows 2 curb cuts on the east side only, Coldwater • Significant topography limits site flexibility Street,vehicular and pedestrian circulation, however, are very hard due to topography • Existing curb cut on Adams is very close to a busy intersection (Beach and Adams) ® Centrally located within the City ® Per FEMAs map#06059CO234H, site is located within Zone X"This area protected from the 1%chance flood by levee, dike, or other structure subject to possible failure during larger floods" o Site requires development and potential environmental sensitivity for a Native American burial/midden site • Site 7A has an Orange County easement, and could have significant drainage issues 43 Concept Planning ................................................................................ �,� 4 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. Prat, _ $ wu The new senior center is planned to provide the senior population of the City of Huntington Beach with a building that integrates the city's programs for a functional building that reflects the unique qualities of this beach community. Each of the identified program spaces is collocated with similar uses to form a `center'within the facility,each with a specific focus. Composed of five 'Centers', the plan diagram illustrates a conceptual notion of how the new senior center could be organized.The following guidelines define the project goals. Character of the new Senior Center • Become a focal point in the community and reflect its importance as a civic asset • Provide a building character that attracts and welcomes the multitude of generations who will receive services offered at the facility • Locate the Social Lounge at the heart of the facility as an extension of the lobby • Respect the environment and provide a strong relationship between indoor and outdoor spaces, incorporating sustainable practices in all aspects of the design • Provide maximum flexibility and multiple uses for the changing program needs and interests of the senior community Building Entrance • Provide a primary entrance to the main reception area, as well as a secondary`event'entrance that provides direct access to the Community Hall • Design the site with easy visibility of entrances from the street.These entrances should also be on flat and level approaches for ease of access • Assure access to the kitchen area for delivery and supply vehicles 44 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. 0 ;elx�, _an nl Building Zoning • Place the building reception area centrally, allowing staff a good vantage point from which to monitor the entire facility • The Fitness Center should be located at a maximum distance from the Social Center to minimize acoustic disruptions • The ability to zone the building to operate`off hours' for Community Hall rentals,without giving access to the entire building • Provide ample pre-function and post-function space for events in the Community Hall. It is beneficial for this space to have access to an outdoor courtyard or terrace for additional rental opportunities • Direct access from the parking area into the Transportation Center, but include this space as part of the main building • Access from most classrooms and fitness spaces to outdoor courtyards or terraces to maximize teaching opportunities and take advantage of the mild climate The conceptual diagram on the next page illustrates the relative relationships between the programmed rooms and areas within the new senior center. This conceptual plan does not relate directly to a specific site,although it does infer relationships of program spaces to the outdoors. It is not intended to be construed as a final floor plan, but rather as the first step in defining the vision of a new senior center for the senior citizens of Huntington Beach. 45 H U N T I N G T 0 N BEACH SENIOR CENTER COMPLEX .................................................................................. anintn Conceptual Plan s TERRA:GE Service ... -A—LA -11 118$O�. � 1 Teaching tchen. flL�11 x �� s Exercise •_ � _ 777 s $ if 1. ter 11rt, il�fch`ers � 'K 711 �.$ wE _ r f ib7ess t y 1 I ( t ICI ' ; V I E tV T E R R A C E,r. x . 46