HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile 1 of 2 - Old Civic Center Site Project Prosposals - Coa Caimark
Properties
a GS1 service
lTelephMone
h Street
2128
lCalmark nica,Ca.90406
s,Inc. 213 829 7453
December 23, 1978
4
Mr. Steven V. Kohler
Senior Community Development Specialist
City of Huntington Beach
Department of Planning and Environmental Resources
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Dear Mr. Kohler:
We are pleased to submit the enclosed proposal for the development
construction and management of 148 senior citizen rental apartments
on the Huntington Beach old Civic Center site. - The units are to
be developed under the Calmark Heritage Park Concept, a proven
housing concept already providing needed housing for the elderly
in other cities of Southern California.
I encourage you, your consultant, members of your City Council,
and Planning Commission and any other interested party to tour
our completed Heritage Park project in Duarte. An onsite in-
spection will give you a better sense of what the City can real '
ize from our concept than will any proposal. - For those who can
visit the site, I' enclose a site location map; for those who are
unable to visit, I enclose a set of photographs of exterior and
interior views of the project.
An extremely sigrii`f cant aspect of CalmarkIs program is the speed
of construction - running six to seven months . Thus, given the
City' s schedule residents could be occupying a newly completed
Heritage Park - Huntington Beach by next Christmas!
We are especially pleased to be able to deliver the one and two
bedroom units for $235 and $250 per month, assuming conventional
market rate financing. To further reduce the cost of housing, we
have consulted with a leading mortgage backed revenue bond consul-
tant and propose lowered rents to $.213 and $231 per month under
this assumption. Alternately, we propose to hold rents constant
and contribute $400, 000 towards the construction of the -Senior
Center. We are available to ,discuss the steps necessary to
obtain this bond financing. Final design of the Senior Center
Mr. Steven V. Kohler
December 23 , 1978
Page Two
will follow determination of the additional funds available. Which-
ever financing method is selected, the City will have a new Senior_
Housing project with rents significantly lower than .in other types
of housing.
With the rents our project can deliver we will reserve 1000 of the
unit for Section 8 - Existing residents. This ongoing right of
first refusal to Section 8 tenants is a part of our program on
all sites.
The old Civic Center site offers an attractive opportunity to
create quality elderly housing in the City of Huntington Beach
in concert with the development of the citywide Senior Center.
The development of this housing will help to meet the strongly
evidenced needs for low and moderate income senior citizens in
Huntincton Beach.
I look forward to helping meet the housing needs of Huntington
Beach senior citizens. If you have any questions concerning this
proposal please call me.
Sincerely,
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
hn M. Huskey
Director of Mult ' �il
JMH:kp
Enclosures
-APPLICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST-
Planning Commission meeting date:
Application accepted on: Planner in charge:
Has filing status been sent to applicant?
Staff report due date:
Review file; are plans complete?
Has letter of authorization been verified?
Has request for Ordinance been sent to Attorney?
Has legal description been prepared?
Legal notice publishing date: 0-
Have A.P. ' s been completed? E 2 D
Has area map been completed?
Are photographs required?
Has plan check been completed?
Inter-department review form sent on?
(ALLOW ONE WEEK RESPONSE TIME)
Negative Declaration assigned to:
Negative Declaration number:
Legal Notice publishing date:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
A-FM-22A
HERITAGE PARK - HUNTINGTON BEACH
A Proposal
For 148 Rental Apartments
and
Senior Citizen Center
PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
DECEMBER 23, 1978
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
Calmark
Properties
a CM service
1633 26th Street
P.O.Box 2128
IP(�ropperfies,
Santa Monica,Ca.90406
Inc. Telephone 213 829 7453
December 23, 1978
Mr. Steven V. Kohler
Senior Community Development Specialist
City of Huntington Beach
Department of Planning and Environmental Resources
P.O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Dear Mr. Kohler:
We are pleased to submit the enclosed proposal for the development
construction and management of 148 senior citizen rental apartments
on the Huntington Beach old Civic Center site. The units are to
be developed under the Calmark Heritage Park Concept, a proven
housing concept already providing needed housing for the elderly
in other cities of Southern California.
I encourage you, your consultant, members of your City Council,
and Planning Commission and any other interested party to tour
our completed Heritage Park project in Duarte. An onsite in-
spection will give you a better sense of what the City can real-
ize from our concept than will any proposal. For those who can
visit the site, I enclose a site location map; for those who are
unable to visit, I enclose a set of photographs of exterior and
interior views of the project.
An extremely significant aspect of Calmark's program is the speed
of construction - running six to seven months. Thus, given the
City' s schedule residents could be occupying a newly completed
Heritage Park - Huntington Beach by next Christmas!
We are especially pleased to be able to deliver the one and two
bedroom units for $235 and $250 per month, assuming conventional
market rate financing. To further reduce the cost of housing, we
have consulted with a leading mortgage backed revenue bond consul-
tant and propose lowered rents to $213 and $231 per month under
this assumption. Alternately, we propose to hold rents constant
and contribute $400,000 towards the construction of the Senior
Center. We are available to discuss the steps necessary to
obtain this bond financing. Final design of the Senior Center
Mr. Steven V. Kohler
December 23, 1978
Page Two
will follow determination of the additional funds available. Which-
ever financing method is selected, the City will have a new Senior
Housing project with rents significantly lower than in other types
of housing.
With the rents our project can deliver we will reserve 1000 of the
unit for Section 8 - Existing residents. This ongoing right of
first refusal to Section 8 tenants is a part of our program on
all sites.
The old Civic Center site offers an attractive opportunity to
create quality elderly housing in the City of Huntington Beach
in concert with the development of the citywide Senior Center.
The development of this housing will help to meet the strongly
evidenced needs for low and moderate income senior citizens in
Huntington Beach.
I look forward to helping meet the housing needs of Huntington
Beach senior citizens. If you have any questions concerning this
proposal please call me.
Sincerely,
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
hn M. Huskey
Director of Multi ilv
JMH:kp
Enclosures
IfQUALIFICATIONS
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
Calmark Properties, Inc. is a sub-holding company of GSI, Inc. GSI,
Inc. is the insurance, business services, and real estate holding company.
Calmark was Formed in 1974 under the financial sponsorship of Esmark,
Inc. and consists of the same nucleus of personnel who had Founded and
operated Continental Multi-Homes, Inc. and the Multi--Housing Division
of the Larwin Group.
The Calmark Team has developed over 12,000 rental and For-sale housing
units over the past eight years (see attached list). Calmark is the con-
sulting developer for "Walden Lake", a 2,000 acre planned community
in Florida
In the Face of this nationis current and increasing housing crisis, Calmark
has recognized both the opportunity and responsibility to develop housing
for the elderly and low to moderate income families by both pioneering
new conventionally Financed construction housing programs, and by
participation in Federally assisted housing programs.
To accomplish this objective, Calmark applies superior professional
talent utilizing the most advanced techniques in market research, archi-
tecture and construction, property management, and marketing .
It is through this process that Calmark has been able to produce quality
conventional housing projects .
J . S . BROWN, PRESIDENT
J . B . Brown is the Senior Real Estate executive within GS I, Inc.
As President of Calmark, he also is on the Board of Directors of GSI,
Inc., Calmark's corporate parent.
A graduate of the Stanford Graduate School of Business, Mr. Brown
has over 20 years experience in all phases of residential development
-and holds an active contractor's license.
In 1959, Mr. Brown founded the Multi-Housing Division of the Larwin
Group, Inc. and has kept the basic management group together with him
since; founding Continental Multi-Homes, Inc . and Calmark Properties,
Inc. and developing over 12,000 multi-family units. (See attached list).
Prior to being President of these development companies, J . B . was
Vice President and head of the State-Wide Properties Department at
First Western Bank.
L. BILL KAUFMANN, VICE PRESIDENT
Mr. Kaufmann directs all new construction programs of Calmark Properties,
Inc. and has been responsible for all program development, feasibility
analysis, market research, site acquisitions, architecture and project
financing . Bill's work, together with the financial and tax expertise of
Howard Miller, Calmark's other Vice President, has made Calmark's
Project Feasibility Analysis such a precise decision making tool that
many experienced financial institutions have used Calmark as their
consultant in this area . . . including such financial organizations as:
The Chase Manhattan Bank, Lloyds Bank of California, The American
National Bank of Chicago, E. F . Hutton & Company, Inc. and Donaldson,
Lufkin and Jenrette, Inc.
Prior to forming Calmark Properties, Inc. , Bill was Senior Vice Pres-
ident at Larwin and Continental Multi-Homes, Inc. Besides his
development work fo the past seven years, his twelve year experience
in the housing industry includes positions as mortgage banker for Cold-
well Banker & Co. and four years as Urban Land Economist with Stanford
Research Institute and Development Research Associates, where he
conducted feasibility analysis on a wide range of studies throughout the
United States and Canada.
Bill received a Bachelor of Science in Real Estate from San Jose State
University.
HOWARD A. MILLER, VICE PRESIDENT
As chief financial officer of Calmark, Howard Miller directs all the marketing
and financial aspects of Calmark's operations .
A graduate of UCLA, Mr. Miller preceded his role at Calmark with positions
of Senior Vice President at Continental Multi-Homes, Inc. and Larwin Multi-
Family Housing, Inc. Prior to his work with these development companies,
Howard owned and managed a development company of his own, developing
• single-family and income properties in the San Fernando Valley and West Los
Angeles. His twenty years experience in Southern California real estate
includes nine years with the Los Angeles County Assessor's Office.
Mr. Miller has a national reputation as a leader in the area of residential
marketing and the structuring of income properties. Due to this capability,
Calmark has been utilized as a consultant to major financial institutions in
their own investment decisions .
JOHN M . HUSKEY, DIRECTOR, MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Huskey directs the development activities relating to Calmark's Heritage
Park program . In this capacity, he is responsible for site location, com-
munity interface, zoning, and financing .
Prior to his involvement with Calmark Properties, Inc. , John directed social
and environmental impact studies for the City of Boulder, Colorado, and was
Project Director for the Boulder Transportation Study.
Earlier, John developed familiarity with the California housing market as
Director of Market Research for Continental Multi-Homes, Inc. , and as an
Associate with Development Research Associates of Los Angeles .
John's educational experience included a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from
the University of Notre Dame and additional work at Sophia University in
Tokyo, Japan.
FREDERICK UNGER, VICE PRESIDENT OF CALMARK ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.
As Vice President, Fred directs all Property Management activities.
Fred received a Bachelor of Science degree in Finance from the University
of Southern California.
Prior to joining Calmark Properties, Fred was associated with CNA Investment
Advisors, Inc. , the manager of LMI Investors, a California-based real estate
trust.
FREDERICK UNGER - Continued
Fred is a licensed Real Estate Broker in California and Texas and a
Certified Property Manager
RALPH S . BINNEY, CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
Ralph is responsible for all aspects of direct construction - estimating, purchasing
and construction supervision in all of the Heritage Park senior citizen programs .
Many of the cost-saving techniques utilized in the Heritage Park program have
come from improvements he has discovered in the process of building . Prior
to handling the Heritage Park program for Calmark, Ralph directed purchasing
and estimating operations for Binney/McKee Construction Company. Previous
to this, he served the building industry as Senior Building Inspector for the City
of Beverly Hills.
In addition to his other qualifications, Ralph's activity with the California Fire
Chiefs' Association and the Los Angeles County Sheriff Rescue Team brings
valuable perspectives to his job.
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
November 25, 1978
(Unaudited)
ASSETS:
Cash $ 308,334
Accounts/Notes Receivable 2,999,806
Accrued Interest Receivable 167,622
All-Inclusive Trust Deeds Receivable 1,237,916
Real Estate Inventory 29,627,638
Fixed Assets Net of Accumulated Depreciation• of $19,688 32,221
Deposits and Prepaid Items 292,384
TOTAL ASSETS: $34,665,921
LIA.JLITIES:
Account Payable to Parent $ 1 ,390,074
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities 666,265
Accrued State Income Tax 155,625
Mortgages/Notes Payable Secured by Real Estate Inventory 26,000,688
Security Deposits and Deposits from Buyers 1 ,6912864
TOTAL LIABTLITIES: $29,904,516
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
Common Stock $ 500,000
Paid in Surplus 2, 113,219
Retained Earnings 2,1481186
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: $ 4,7617405
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY $34,665,921
PROJECTS CURRENTLY MANAGED BY
CALMARK ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.
PROJECT NAME ADDRESS # UNITS
Meadowlake 2772 Treasure Island West 838
Memphis, Tenn. 38118
Mission Hills 10636 Woodley 88
(Continental Village at Granada Hills, CA 91344
Mission Hills)
Spanish Meadows 2100 East Loop 820 180
Fort Worth, TX 76112
Tanglewood 1516 East Irving Blvd 170
Irving, TX 75060
Los Vaqueros 1551 West Airport Freeway 168
Irving, TX 75062
Seven Springs 751 North Indian Creek Drive 603
Clarkstone, GA 30021
2,401
COMPLETED SENIOR CITIZEN
HERITAGE PARK PROJECTS
Duarte 915 Highland Avenue 120
Duarte, CA 91010
San Bernardino 233 East 17th Street 110
San Bernardino, CA 92404
Oxnard 820 S. E. Street 195
Oxnard, CA 93030
425
TOTAL 2,826
:EXISTING PROJECTS PURCHASED FOR. INVENTORY
No. Completion
Name Type Location Units Date
1. Colonial Estates A & F Houston, Texas 307 .1974
2. Carnaby A & F Dallas, Texas • 176 1974
3. NASA Colonades A & F Houston, Texas 326 1975
4. Dilston House A & F Houston, Texas 221 1.975
5. Spanish Meadows A & F Fort Worth, Texas 180 1975
6. Bellaire Villas A & F Houston, Texas 24U 1976
7. Westheimer Villas A & F Houston, Texas 2.00 1975
8. Audelia Heights A & F Dallas, Texas 280 1976
9. Cinnamon Trace A & F Houston, Texas 164 1976
10. Tanglewood A & F Irving, Texas 170 1976
11. Meadowlake Adult Memphis, Tennessee 838 1976
12. The Place A & F Dallas, Texas 350 1975
13. La Fairesta A & F La Crescenta, California 1974
14. Los Vaqueros A & F Irving, Texas 168 1963
15. -Apple Place A & F Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 184 1972
16. Seven Springs A & F Clarkston, Georgia 603 1970 & 1973
SUBTOTAL 4,499
Condominium/Townhomes
1. Continental Terrace Adult Pasadena, California 49 1974
2. Continental Townhomes Adult Monterey Park, California 96 1974
3. Tarzana Oaks Family Tarzana, California 71 1974
4. Continental 805 Adult Inglewood, California 51 1973
5. Continental 605 Adult Glendale, California 39 1973
6. Camelot Family Culver City, California 152 1973
7. Willis Adult Sherman Oaks, California 33 1973
8. Diplomat Adult Los Angeles, California 52 1975
9. Simi Townhouses Family Simi, California 60 1979 uc
SUBTOTAL 603
GRAND TOTAL 12,570
KEY:
Adult (A) - A multi-family project restricted to infants and persons
over 16 years of age.
Family (F) - A multi-family project with no age restrictions; special
children's amenities, i.e. , child care centers, playground
facilities, etc.
REFERENCES
FINANCIAL:
UNITED CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE
Robert C. Hamer
Senior Vice President
245 South Los Robles Avenue
Pasadena, California 91109
USLIFE SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
Herbert J. Hodgdon
Executive Vice President
5220 Wilshire Blvd
Los Angeles, California 90036
WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A.
G. Michael Oberst
Vice President Real Estate
770 Wilshire Blvd
Los Angeles , California 90017
GSI , INC.
Robert C. Benson
Treasurer
222 North Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60601
DUNN AND BRADSTREET
Company Number - 07-622-7628
Rating - AAA-2
CIVIC: CITY OF DUARTE
Ken Caresio - City Manager
Peter M. Fertiq - Plan Director
1634 East Third Street
Duarte, California
CITY OF OXNARD
Larry K. Hogle - Director of Communitv Development
Robert Prescott - Director Housing Authority
241 West Second Street
Oxnard , California 93030
REFERENCES (Continued)'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Jack Riley - Planning Director
Al Harkins - Director Housing Authority
300 North "D" Street
• San Bernardino, California 92418
CITY OF SIMI VALLEY
Wayne Goldherg - Planning Director
Ernie Glover - Housing Planner
3855 Alamo Street
Simi Valley, California 93063
SOURCES OF FINANCING
• Calmark Properties, Inc. has long established relationships with
commercial banks , mortgage loan brokers and savings and loan
institutions and currently has other Heritage Park projects
with interim and permanent financing from each of these types .
Our key financial contacts are listed on the referenced page in
the Qualifications Section.
Lists of projects, lenders and loan detail are available on request.
It is our policy in the Heritage Park program to seek the lowest
rents by reducing costs - including the cost of money. We there-
fore intend to "shop" for the lowest rate available.
To further reduce costs to our residents Calmark is currently ex-
ploring mortgage backed revenue bonds and would recommend that
the City pursue this possibility. Our preliminary discussions
with consultants in this field indicate that the City of Hunting-
ton Beach and this project are eligible.
For this reason we have prepared a financial analysis under two
interest rate assumptions : 1) Mortgage backed revenue bonds at
8 1/2% per annum and 2) Market rate mortgage at 10 . 5% per annum.
EESTGN
PROSPECT DESIGN
Site Plan - Organized in a transition of uses from public on the
north end (library) to semi-private (recreation center) to private
residential, the site plan contains the existing library building,
a 10 , 000 to 12 , 300 square foot Senior Citizen Center to be con-
structed and 148 residential units . These are discussed
separately below.
Residential Units - 124 one bedroom and 24 two bedroom units in
seven two-story buildings in four building types are shown in
the attached plot plan. The units will be developed under the
Calmark Heritage Park Concept which is described in detail in
the Concept Section.
Landscaping - Detailed plan not presented but allowance of $63 , 000
or $ . 75 per square foot together with retention of the existing
on-site trees will insure full landscaping to the city ' s satis-
faction.
Typical landscaped view of a Heritage Park program can be seen in
the photos of existing projects . Over 500 of the residential site
will be landscaped open area.
Unit Amenity - The residential units are the one bedroom and two
bedroom floor plan shown in the exhibits . These plans were
developed after extensive research into the needs of the elderly
(copies of which are available) and improved over time with the
experience of the Heritage Park program. They can be experienced
by visiting our completed projects in Duarte and San Bernardino.
Amenities - In an effort to check on our program against an estab-
lished set of guidelines we have evaluated a project using the
standards set for the Housing For The Elderly, The On-Site Housinq
Manager ' s Resource Book, published by the National Center For
Housing Management, Inc .
This evaluation is shown on the following page.
FIGURE 2-6: HOUSING DESIGN FOR THE ELDERLY
Does your property
Needs of Elderly Design Features have these?
Touch Sensation Temperature and climate controls __ Yes
Heat lamps in the bathrooms _ Yes -
Hot-cold water temperature controls Yes
Regulated air flow Yes
Front range controls _ Yes
Lever door handles Yes
Mobi'ity-Agility Hand rails along halls and stairs -__Yes
Benches in shower stalls Yes
Grab bars in bathroom areas Yes _-
Kitchen shelves less than 63" Yes
Electrical outlets at least 24"high _ Yes -
Non-skid floors Yes
Automatic front doors Not Applicable
- - -_ _
Benches in elevators and elevator lobbies __Not Applicable
Sturdy, comfortable furniture __Yes - -
Easy-to-open windows _ Yes
On grade entrances Yes (lst Floor)
Automatic elevators Not Applicable
Public laundry facilities Yes
Easy-to-use garbage disposal system Yes
Wall hung light fixtures Yes -
Self-defrosting refrigerators Not Selected
Easy-to-use fire extinguishers _ Yes _
Smell Sensation Electric stoves instead of gas _ Yes - -_
Smoke detectors
Adequate ventilation Yes
Sanitary garbage disposal system —_ Yes
Sight Well lighted apartments, halls, parking areas __Yes
Use of color contrasts _Yes___
Highly visible risers — _Yes _
Large print readable signs, papers, controls Yes .
Front door peep holes _--Yes
Height of windows Yes
Fluorescent lighting in kitchens Yes
Hearing Adequate sound insulation _ Yes-
I Specially tuned door bells
Good fire alarm systems _ Yes
Social Needs Outdoor recreation areas Yes
' Adequate indoor community space Yes
Lobby areas with furniture _ Yes (Rec. Center)
Benches in mailbox areas _ Yes (Rec. Center)
Chairs or benches near building entrances Yes (Rec. Center)
Health care facilities No
Furniture for sitting in laundry rocros Yes (Rec. Center)
Security Emergency alarm system in apartments Yes
Strong secure locks Yes
Two-way communication in elevators Not Applicable
Entrance-exit monitoring system Not Applicable
2-13
L'XTERIOR ELEVATION
We propose to utilize a slightly different exterior elevation in
Huntington Beach from that used in the first Heritage Park program
(the one whose photographs are included in this booklet) . This
is consistent both with Calmark ' s policy of modifying the building
exterior where the climactic conditions suggest it (as in our Palm
Springs project) and our desire to insure compatibility with the
City of Huntington BeacIl' s Mediterranean type image.
r
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
A 103000 to 12,300 sq. ft. , 2-story, multi-purpose senior citizen center is
proposed to be located between the library and residential sections of the site.
The center will serve both needs of the residential units as well as the city-
wide senior needs. Detailed architectural design has not been completed for
this proposal due to the limited time available. The "footprint" on the site
plan has been designed to allow a building configuration for a center with all
of the described functions plus room for others which will come up in final
design. Depending upon the financing choices made, the residential portion
of the project will contribute monies to the center to enable it to be larger
and improved over what could otherwise be built with available funds.
Actual design of the senior citizen center will be done in cooperation with
the city council, city staff, council on aging, and other community input
areas and facilities of the center serving city-wide needs will be:
o Assembly Room
o Kitchen Facilities
o Office space area for outreach program, center staff, and other
senior groups
o Game Room
o Meeting Rooms (3)
o Outdoor patio area with shuffleboard area (see site plan), lawn
furniture, eating area
o Parking for 70 cars, turnaround and tour bus parking
Areas and facilities of the center serving the residential project are as
follows:
o Laundry room (6 washers and 6 dryers--these facilities can be
used by others as well but are designed for use by the local
residents)
o Office for resident manager of the rental units
o Mail box area
This use of the social and recreational center works very well in existing
Heritage Park programs and would bring a "home" feeling to the center.
a
a
�a
00 31
� a
a �
� a
� � a
� a �
�I �y KERMIT DORIUS SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING
AND ASSOCIATES HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIF.
ARCHITECTS•INCORPORATED CALMARK PROPERTIES INC.
Jd Itl33 28 TH ST, SANTA MONICA CALIF.
T
I � \
A
O � D
EM
Clog 0 to
Pao ME r
N
0
CGNV i
�p 00 0
V �
ME
I
4 -
I_ ors ®® ate. Lm
Il
KERMIT DDRIUS SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING
u AND ASSOCIATES MUNTINOTON BEACH CALIF.
ARCNITECT9•INCORPOMTM CALMARK PROPERTIES INC.
tl0 ,1E33 ■E TM ST. EANTA MONICA CALIF.
' I
�.o
27 b
12-2 I h�� 31t
12,�i 5-511 to=oll
i
- oo t
L
O O
- �rl 0
u: IL
Q u 2 u
DIN KIT BATH CLOS! _ DIN KIT_ ATH I BEDROOM 2 (31-u
a �.�L Nr=. "o oo I^IN
w/ti'a. e —— I.pv. aa111leP- ' „IO I V. m N 0.
w
O
7��Q
N 0'�z
u _4 I—— 'ry z Q
2 W0
HALL ZI am
W01
W
LIVING BEDROOM
IIR113 lo°pxlo�4 n
- E 0 - C
i J
W Q
LIVING BEDROOM I -I W U
Nriize Pim 4x hi II*II
3- Oo w
a w
0" o e
U
QO
ONE BORM TWO BORMQ <'
,GAF „ �
114o
a i I
-1
v � -
fj
N
KERMIT DORIUS SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING
AND ASSOCIATES .... HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIF
y ARCHITECTS•INCORPORATED CALMARK PROPERTIES INC.
1633 26 TH ST, BANTA MONICA CALIF.
CONCEPT
'THE CA LMARK
ELDERLY HOUSING CONCEPT
The project in Huntington Beach is proposed to be developed under the
Calmark Heritage Park concept. A description of this concept is presented
here.
• • BACKGROUND
Elderly population in the United States, in California,- and in Southern
California is increasing at a Faster rate than the population as a whole.
The elderly component of the population will be the fastest growing
segment of the population throughout the century.
Coupled with this' rise'in elderly population has been an increasingly
evidenced need for housing the elderly. Traditional responses keyed
to this demand have been either expensive luxury "retirement villas"
catering to the very wealthy, or subsidy programs funded by the federal
government. Neither of these responses have been able to satisfy a
significant portion of the need . The percentage of senior households who
can afford the $500 - $800 per month, and up, for "retirement hotel"
living is very small . While the federal subsidy programs only serve to
raise expectations for many, while actually providing new housing for
only a very few, the largest segment of the elderly population remains
ignored. It is this segment, the elderly population, who cannot afford '
luxury retirement facilities, yet desire the lifestyle amenities of living
with other seniors, that constitute the largest concentration of unmet housing
demand.
CONCEPT
In response to this large demand for housing the elderly, Calmark Properties,
Inc. has developed its Senior Citizen Housing Concept -- a private sector,
conventionally financed, basic housing rental program that can deliver housing
for the elderly at substantial savings over typical private market and subsidy
programs. Key points of this concept are as follows:
o Market segmentation - Plan, design, develop, market, and
manage apartment exclusively For the elderly.
o Lifestyle amenity - By limiting project occupancy to senior
citizens, thus providing a sufficient concentration of seniors
in one place, substantial social, cultural, and economic
opportunities are offered to residents.
o Smaller units - By eliminating hall areas, and maximizing
• efficiency in other areas, Calmark has designed a one-bedroom
unit of.460 square feet and a 680 square Foot two-bedroom unit
which.meet all of the basic requirements of a suitable home.
o Two-story garden level construction - exterior loaded - back to
back. By building the units in short rows, and in two-story garden
construction, Calmark has been able to deliver quality housing in
a desirable environment without the added expense of higher-rise
construction.
o Higher density - 40-50 units to the acre without sacrificing open
space. Landscaped open space at a Heritage Park project is
over 50%
o Location - Chosen with the elderly in mind. Proximity to:
o Shopping
o Churches
o Parks
o Medical
o Community Facilities
o Transit
o Proper scale - Large enough For economics of scale; small
enough for personal management and sense of community.
100 - 200 units.
o On-site amenities - Social and recreation center, laundry
facilities, 50% + open space.
o Activity programs - By providing space and facilitating group
activity, a large number of activities offer alternatives to the
solitary life that so many older citizens suffer through in general-
occupancy residences.
o OFF-site amenities - Cooperation with local and metropolitan
resource groups to provide free or low cost services to residences.
o Parking - parking reduced to reflect actual decreased automobile
ownership by moderate income senior citizen residents.
o Proven product - a successful Heritage Park project is already
completed, occupied, and functioning, and another four projects
with 305 units have been recently completed. This completed
project gives lenders, governmental groups, and others a chance
to see the program as it will really be when it is complete, all
prior to construction or zoning approval. The newsletter published
by the residents of this project is included in this brochure.
o Utilizes Section 8 - existing opportunities .
As a result of the Calmark concept, a new option for expanding
housing opportunities for the elderly has arisen. This is cooperation
with local Housing Authorities who refer tenants and will help to
subsidize rents for that portion of the elderly population who cannot
afford to live in Heritage Park projects without assistance. This
cooperation with local Housing Authorities has worked very well at
Heritage Park - Duarte, the first Heritage Park project, where 15 -
20% of the residents receive Section 8 Existing subsidies and the
cooperation is working well at the various proposed developments
at their current stages.
ACTIVITIES & RESIDENT PARTICIPATION
An extensive program of social, cultural, and "self-help" activities is planned
for every Heritage Park project. This program will be similar to that already
in operation at Heritage Park - Duarte, the first Heritage Park project.
The recreation building at Heritage Park projects will be used for such
organized activities as : bingo, potluck dinners, dancing, card parties, arts
and crafts, needlework and discussion groups. The outdoor facilities will
be utilized for friendly evening barbeques, shuffleboard, and informal con-
versation and relazation.
Special outings will be planned, a Resident Activity Chairman and committee
will be elected, and a monthly newsletter is scheduled to be published for and
about the residents of Heritage Park.
Copies of the resident newspaper are included in the appendix.
MARKET ACCEPTANCE
The combination of attractive social programs, new housing and lower
rents than typical have enqendered a very favorable market acceptance
of Calmark' s Heritage Park program. Especially in those areas where
Section 8 existing has been applied, the evidence demand is very
strong.
More noteworthy, and more gratifying to us, is the favorable reaction
we have received when a resident had a choice that did not take money
into account. For example, in Oxnard, California where Calmark
Heritage Park program is located immediately adjacent to a recently
constructed five-story H.U.D. building. Since Section 8 residents
pay the same proportion of their income for housing, there is no
financial difference to them whether they live in the mid-rise
tower or in Calmark' s two-story garden construction units. Never-
theless many residents of the tower are opting to become residents
of Heritage Park Oxnard because of the less institutional feeling in
the low-rise project. This is in spite of the fact that the tower
utilized substantially more expensive methods of construction and
contains a more luxury amenity package.
More than the market indicators , written feedback which we have
received from our own tenants will go further to describe the true
acceptance of Calmark' s Heritage Park program. For this reason
on the following pages I have reproduced copies of letters that we
have received from residents of our Heritage Park programs.
1` .X .
3
, c ix
kk
� �
F NANCIAL
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
This section presents the proposed rent structure, construction costs, and
other financial data relating to the construction and operation of the 148
senior citizen units. The analysis which follows is based upon certain key
assumptions which are listed below:
o The City of Huntington Beach will let the old civic center site on
a long term lease at an annual lease payment of $1/year to a
limited partnership whose general partner is owned by Calmark.
o Calmark will remain as owner of the general partner.
o Calmark will retain the option to admit tax shelter seeking investors
into the limited partnership.
o The management of the residential units is to be done by Calmark's
wholly owned management company, Calmark Asset Management
Company.
Based upon these assumptions and upon our experience in the other sites of
the Heritage Park program, we propose three alternative financial structures
which are presented in detail in the Exhibits which follow. These alternatives
are:
ALTERNATIVE #1 - conventional permanent loan at market rate of interest,
assumed to be 30 year, fully amortizing loan at 10.5% .
ALTERNATIVE #2 - mortgage backed revenue bond financing through the City
of Huntington Beach, assumed to be 30 year fully amortizing loan at 8 .5% .
The residential project will contribute $400,000 towards the senior citizen
recreation center or other City purpose . This is possible because of the
reduction in debt service while holding rents constant (as compared to Alt. #1).
ALTERNATIVE #3 - mortgage backed revenue bond financing through the City
of Huntington Beach assumed to be 30 year fully amortizing loan at 8.5%. The
project's rents will be reduced $22 and $29 per month in the one and two
bedroom units respectively from the level of Alternative #1 .
In all cases, the loans are established at reasonable levels based upon accepted
lending industry guidelines.
Construction cost estimates and operating expense schedules based upon other
similar projects in the Heritage Park program are presented in Exhibits 1 and
21 and are identical for all alternatives. It should be noted that the interim
construction loan is at market rates--assumed to be 12%. Exhibit 3 presents
the income analysis for each of the alternatives. Exhibit 4 examines the loans
in each alternative for reasonableness. Exhibit 5 presents the return on
investment analysis for each of the alternatives.
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
HERITAGE PARK-HUNTINGTON BEACH
EXHIBIT 1
INCOME PROJECTIONS
ALTERNATIVE 1
No. of Rent Per Mo. Rent
Units Type Size Month Per Sq . Ft.
124 1 -bedroom 462 $ 235 $ .509
24 2-bedroom 684 $ 250 $ .365
148 73,704 $35,140 $ .477
Income
Gross Rental Income $421 ,680
Annual Misc. Income 2,452
GROSS ANNUAL INCOME $424,632
Less: Vacancy Allowance - 3% 1 2,739
ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME $411 ,893
ALTERNATIVE 2
No. of Rent Per Mo. Rent
Units Type Size Month Per Sq . Ft.
124 1 -bedroom 462 $ 235 $ .509
24 - 2-bedroom 684 $ 250 $ .365
148 73, 704 $35191 40 $ .477
Income
Gross Rental Income $421 ,680
Annual Misc . Income 2,952
GROSS ANNUAL INCOME $424,632
Less: Vacancy Allowance - 3% 12.9739
ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME $411 ,893
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
HERITAGE PARK-HUNTINGTON BEACH
EXHIBIT 1
INCOME PROJECTIONS (CONT'D .)
ALTERNATIVE 3
No. of Rent Per Mo. Rent
Units Type Size Month Per Sq . Ft.
124 !-bedroom 462 $ 213 $ .461
24 2-bedroom 684 $ 231 $ .338
148 73,704 $31 ,956 $ .434
Income
Gross Rental Income $383,472
Annual Misc. Income 2,952
GROSS ANNUAL INCOME $3861424
Less: Vacancy Allowance - 3/0 11 ,593
ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME $3742831
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
HERITAGE PARK-HUNTINGTON BEACH
EXHIBIT IA
OPERATING EXPENSE PROJECTION
Taxes $ 30,000
Insurance 5,900
• Utilities 14,200
Advertising 3.1000
Management Fee . 24,367
Cleaning Fee 13480
Painting and Decorating 740
Maintenance and Reserves 71400
Grounds 4,933
Pest Control 910
Trash Removal 6,290
Payroll 19,800
General and Administrative 9,720
Total Expenses $128, 740
Land Lease $ I
Total Annual Expenses $1285,741
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
HERITAGE PARK-HUNTINGTON BEACH
EXHIBIT 2
COST OF CONSTRUCTION
LAND COST
Land - 3.64 acres (Long Term Lease)
CONSTRUCTION COST
• Base Cost $1 ,71 9, 190 73J.704 sq. ft.
Parking 0
Indirect 381000
Onsite Cost 163.1800
Offsite 0
Fees 1 85,095
Exterior Common Areas 63,014 426/unit
Outdoor equipment 2.V500
Architectural & Engineering 40,256
Subtotal Construction $2,21 1 ,860 $30.01/sq. ft.
MARKETING COST
Rent-up $ 10j,000
Rec. Furnishings 0
Advance & Models 14.1800
Selling Expense
Legal 20,000
Subtotal Marketing $ 44,800 148 units
FINANCING COST
Int. Loan Fee $ 31 .9725
Perm . Loan Fee 31 ,725
Const. Int. (1 2%, 6M + 2M) 116,325
Closing Cost 13.3p320
Taxes 4,550
Subtotal Financing $ 1971645
RESERVES
Contingencies & Warranties $ 44,237 $ 44,237
Total Construction Costs $2,498,534
Builder's Profit a/ 221 , 186
Total Cost $2,719,720
a/ 10% of Construction Subtotal
CAL-MARK PROPERTIES, INC.
HERITAGE PARK, HUN'T'INGTON BEACH
INCOME AND EXPENSE DATA
EXHIBIT 3
ALTERNATE #1 ALTERNATE #2 ALTERNATE #3
Conventional "Revenue "Revenue
Bond - A" Bond - B"
1 Bedroom Rents $ 235 $ 235 $ 213
2 Bedroom Rents 250 250 231
GROSS RENTAL INCOME $421 , 680 $421 , 680 $383 , 472
MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 2 , 952 2 , 952 2 , 952
GROSS ANNUAL INCOME $424 , 632 $424 , 632 $386 ,424
3% VACANCY LOSS ($ 12 ,739) ($ 12 ,739) ($ 11, 593)
OPERATING EXPENSES ( 128 , 740) ( 128 ,740) ( 128 ,740)
LAND LEASE ( 1) ( 1) ( 1)
NET OPERATING INCOME $283 , 152 $283 , 152 $246 , 090
DEBT SERVICE ( 5232 , 161) ( $232 , 151) ( $199 , 672)
a/
NET SPENDABLE INCOME 50, 991 51, 001 46 , 418
a/ Loans
ALTERNATE 41 $2 , 115, 000 30 years - 10 . 5% Conventional Mortgage
ALTERNATE 42 82 , 516 , 000 30 years - 8 . 5% Mortgage Backe,-"Revenue Bonds
ALTERNATE #3 $2 , 164 , 000 30 years - 8 . 5$; Mortgage Backed Revenue Bonds
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
HERITAGE PARK, HUNTINGTON BEACH
EXHIBIT 4
LOAN FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS
ALTERNTATE #1 ALTERNATE #2 ALTERNATE #3
LOAN $2 , 115, 000 $2 , 516 , 000 $2 , 164 , 000
TERM 30 years 30 years 30 years
INTEREST RATE 10 . 5% 8 . 5% 8 . 5%
DEBT SERVICE RATIO 1. 22 1 . 22 1. 23
a/
LENDERS BREAK-EVEN
OCCUPANCY b/ 84 . 99 84 . 99 84 . 99
a/ Ratio of proforma net operating income to debt service.
b/ Occupancy level at which collections exactly equal expenses and debt
service, i. e. point of zero spendable income below which lender ' s
monies are in jeopardy.
CALMARK PROPERTIES, INC.
HERITAGE PARK, HUNTINGTON BEACH
EXHIBIT 5
RETURN ON INVESTMENT CALCULATION
ALTERNATE #1 ALTERNATE #2 ALTERNATE #3
TOTAL PROJECT COST
(From Exhibit 1 ) $2 , 719 , 720 $2 , 719 , 720 $2 ,719 , 720
LOAN 2 , 115, 000 2 , 516 , 000 2 , 164 , 000
EQUITY $ 604 , 720 $ 203 , 720 $ 555,720
SENIOR CITIZEN
CONTRIBUTION 0 $ 400 , 000 0
TOTAL EQUITY
REQUIRED $ 604 , 720 $ 603 ,720 $ 555 , 720
SPENDABLE
INCOME PER YEAR
(From Exhibit 2 ) $ 50, 991 $ 51, 001 $ 46 , 418
RETURN ON INVESTMENT 8 . 430 8 . 44% 8 . 35%
APPENDIX
EnjOy living in a sparkling new one-
bedroom apartment home—complete with
air conditioning,carpeting and draperies
throughout,and an all-electric kitchen
with stove,refrigerator and disposal.
Entertain your friends in the decorator-
designed recreation room with complete
kitchen facilities.
Pursue your hobby in the activity room.
A beautiful new experience Relax in the outdoor activity area.
Plant your own vegetable garden.
in apartment living Experience the convenience of an ideal
location. Walk to shopping and church.
for the mature adult.. . Catch the bus almost in front of your own
apartment. Enjoy convenient freeway access.
• ...more than just a
place to live—your
V place to enjoy!
HERITAGE PARK—DUARTE
Set in a peaceful park-like environment. 915 Highland, Duarte,California 91010
(213)357-5118
Designed exclusively for the mature resident. ROYAL OAKS DRIVE N Exit San Gabriel
lsts� °z Valley Freeway(605)at
a
3rdSTREET
HUNTINGTON DRIVIEHuntington Drive. Go
x left on Huntington Drive
HUNTINGTON DRIVE
SAN to Highland. Go right
FOOTHILL FREEWAY(210)
Fawn(05) on Highland to
Heritage Park.
Managed by: CALMARK ASSET MANAGEMENT,INC.
Residents are limited to those 57 years and over.
Some units are adapted for the handicapped.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING AND RECREATION FACILITIES
OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE
COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT APPLICATION
SUBMITTED TO:
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION
666 E. OCEAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 3107
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801
JUNE, 1980
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
SENIOR HOUSING AND RECREATION FACILITIES
OLD CIVIC CENTER
Coastal Commission Permit Application
TABLE OF CONTENT'S
PART A Page
Section I Type of Permit 1
Section II Applicant 1
Section III Project Description 2
Attachment No. 1 (Question 1 & 5) 7
Attachment No. 2 (Questions 7-10) 9
Attachmmnt No. 3 (Question 19) 10
Section IV Attachments 4
1. Title Report and Deed 14
2. Assessor's Parcel Map 21
3. Notification Materials Under separate
cover
Legal Owner Notification List 22
Occupant Notification List 24
Address Map 26
4. Approval in Concept Form 27
Conditional Use Permit 30
5. N/A
6A Location Map 32
Land Use of Surrounding Parcels Map 33
6B Assessor's Parcel Map 34
6C Project Plans, Site Survey and Utility Under separate
Extensions cover
7. Environmental Impact Report No. 79-1 18 copies under
separate cover
Section V Consistency with California Coastal Act 6
Attachment No. 4 (Question 1) 35
Section VI Certification 6
Section VII Authorization of Agent 6
PART B
Question 17 Attachments
17B, Attachment No. 5; Zone Change Approval 40
17F, Attachment No. 6; Old Civic Center Specific Plan 79-1 44
17I, Attachment No. 7; Design Review Board Minutes 53
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN 1R., Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION
666 E. OCEAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 3107 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT
P O. BOX 1450
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801
213) 5905071 (714) 8460648 PART A
The information requested in PART A must be submitted by all applicants :
SECTION I . TYPE OF PERMIT REQUESTED
1. STANDARD / X /.
2. ADM_INISTRATIVE / /. Applicable if development is in one of the following cate-
gories: (a) Improvement to existing structure and costing less than $25,000; (b) Any
development costing less than $20,000; or (c) Repair or maintenance activities not
resulting in an addition, expansion or enlargement of the object being repaired or main-
tained and the method of repair or maintenance is included within the categories speci-
fied pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 30611(c).
3. WAIVER OF PERMIT REQUIREMENT / /. Applicable for improvements to existing single-
family dwellings included within Section 13250(b) of the regulations but the impact on
coastal resources or coastal access will be insignificant.
4. EMERGENCY / /. Applicable if development is required by an emergency and results
in a permanent structure costing more than $25,000.
5. NOTIFICATION OF EMERGENCY / /. Applicable for emergencies covered by Public
Resources Code Section 30611 and Section 13144 of the regulations.
SECTION II . APPLICANT
1 . Name, address and telephone number of applicant:
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street/ P . 0. Box 190
_ Huntington Beach, California 92648
Zip (Area Code/Telephone Number)
2. Name, address and telephone number of applicant's representative, if any:
Stephen V. Kohler, Senior Community Development Specialist
2000 Main Street/ P . 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach California 92648 (714) 536-5542
Zip (Area Code/Telephone Number)
3. Should the applicant's representative only, instead of the applicant, receive the
written materials relevant to this application? yes
TO BE FILLED IN BY COMMISSION:
APPLICATION NUMBER:
STANDARD
ADMINISTRATIVE. / / DATE RECEIVED:
WAIVED / /
EMERGENCY f
EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION
FILING FEE$
PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DATE FILED:
'Not less than 21 days nor more than
42 days after filing.) A-1
1
SECTION III PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Describe the proposed development. Include in this description:
1. A11 incidential improvements such as utilities, roads, etc. , as well as demolition or
removal of existing structures.
See attachment #1
2. Description of project location (street address, city or county, nearest roads, etc.)
and assessor's parcel numbers.
Fifth and Sixth Streets, Main Street and Orange Avenue
AP Numbers: 24-130-1, 24-130-2
3. Has any previous application been made to the California Coastal Commission or its
predecessor relating to the same site? NO If so, give the previous applica-
tion number N/A
4. Present use of property. If residential state number of units, indicate if owner
occupied, and give monthly rental/.lease rate for each unit.
Community Clinic, Storage building, abandoned Administration
Building, Fire Station converted to leased offices, Branch Library.
5. Nature of proposed development. If residential state number of units or unit mix
(number of 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, etc. units) . If multiple-family residential state
whether units will be apartments or condominiums. Indicate any existing as well as new
on-site structures and lot coverage.
See attachment #1
6. Describe present zoning and general plan designations of the property.
G. P. : "Mixed Use" Zoning: Old Civic Len .er Specific Plan
7. Project height: from existing grade (7-10 see attachment 42) ft.
from average finished grade (AFG) ft.
from centerline of frontage road (CFR) ft.
height of any structure above roofline
of highest habitable floor ft.
8. Total number of floors including subterranean floors, lofts, and mezzanines
9. Gross structural area including covered parking and accessory buildings (in sq. ft.)
; gross structural area excluding parking and
nrcossory building:; (in sq. ft.)
10. I,ot area (within property lines) acres or sq. ft.
Lot coverage by buildings sq. ft.
Total coverage by impervious surfaces _ sq. ft.
Total lot coverage including paving sq. ft.
Landscaped and unimproved area _ _sq. ft.
A- 2
2
11. Number of parking spaces; number covered 44 number open 60 ,
primary 104 size tandem -- size --
12. The setbacks required by the local agency for development on the property:
Front: 12 ' minimum Rear: 12 ' minimum Sideyard: 6 ' minimum
13. Explain any variance or special use permit issued for compliance with above requirements:
N/A - - -
14. Estimated cost of the development (cost valuation of city/county or contractor) :
Housing: $5 , 800, 000 ; Senior Center $600 , 000
15. If any water wells are proposed as part of the development, will the water be used for
domestic or other use or for development or other parcels? If "other", please describe.
—/A-
16. Specify all utility extensions needed to serve the proposed project, including water,
fire hydrants, gas, electric, sewer and telephone. State current location of existing
utility service lines, and indicate whether existing utility service lines and proposed
extensions are above or underground. Indicate how many new poles if any are required;
contact utility company for assistance. Give name of system if on a mutual water system.
So. P.L. : 8" VCP Sewer ext. 70 ' ; 4 x 8 water ext. 48 ' ; West P .L. 8 "
water ext. 220 ' for Fire Hydrant; N. P.L. : 1" water ext. 1201 , 6"
Waterb ext. 0 or Fare Hydrant; E. wa �r e�x
17. BesLlri e any water conservation or energy conservation measures inc ude in�the project.
Project to meet State energy conservation regulations; low-flow
showers and toilets.
18. Describe any alteration of vegetation proposed on the project site, including pruning
or removal of trees or shrubs. Are there any rare or endangered plants or animals
currently on the project site?, Some lawn area to be removed; diseased
palms to be removed. No rare or endangered species present.
1-9. In accordance with Section 13053.5 ,of the Commission's regulations, describe any feasi-
ble alternatives or any feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially
lessen any significant adverse impact which the development may have on the environment.
For purposes of this section the term "significant adverse impact on the environment"
shall be defined as in the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines
adopted pursuant thereto.
See attachment 43
20. Describe the project's CEQA status, including date of EIR approval or Negative Declara-
tion status granted, if any.
EIR No. 79-1; Certified January 7 , 1980 (Copies attached)
A-3
3
SECTION I V. ATTAC HMENT S
The following items must be submitted with this form as part of the application:
1. Pursuant to Section 13053.5(b) of the Commission's regulations, describe the applicant's
legal interest in all the property upon which work would be performed if the application
were approved, e.g. , ownership, leasehold, enforceable option authority to acquire the
specific property by eminent domain. This may be shown by submitting a copy of current
tax bill, grant deed, signed or certified escrow instructions (i.e. , signed by both
parties - buyer and seller) . Please note that in certain situations (most likely those
involving the possibility of public ownership of the property thereby placing a cloud
on private title) the Executive Director may require a title report to demonstrate a
sufficient legal interest in the property.
2. An assessor's parcel map of the property (and assessor's maps of all properties within
100 feet of the property lines) .
3. Materials for notification of nearby property owners/occupants, including:
a. Notification for owners of record:
1. A separate list of all property owners of record within 100 feet from all
boundary edges of the applicant's property.
2. A sketch as per the attached sample which depicts the surrounding properties
within 100 feet as noted above (show correct dimensions of each lot) , and
indicate thereon the name and address of each property owner. (Note: Streets
and other public right-of-ways are not to be included as part of the 100 feet.)
3. A list of names and addresses of all other parties known to the applicant to
have an interest in the proposed development.
4. One stamped, plain business--letter sized envelope addressed to each of the
above owners of record and other interested parties. Each address shall
include zip code. NO meter stamps will be accepted.
b. Notification for occupants:
1. A separate list of all known addresses including each apartment, suite, business
location, lease space, leasehold, etc. , within 1.00 feet from all boundary edges
of the applicant's property.
2. One stamped, plain business-letter sized envelope addressed to "Occupant" at
each of the above noted locations. Each address shall include zip code. NO
meter stamps will be accepted.
The applicant shall also place a legend on the front of each and every envelope includ-
ing the words -- "IMPORTANT. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE" . The Executive Director
has provided an appropriate stamp for the use of applicants in the Regional Commission
office. The legend shall be legible and of sufficient size to be reasonably noted by
the recipient of the envelope.
These lists shall be part of the public record maintained by the Regional Commission
for the application.
Names and addresses of property owners are available in County Assessors' offices and
some Recorders' offices. Applicants should make every effort to verify that the names
of rp esent property owners are provided to the Regional Commission staff. Public copies
of assessors' tax rolls sometimes do not reflect recent sales. Inability of the staff
to notify present owners and occupants of your application and scheduled hearing may
result in delay of the hearing or in the voiding of any permit issued to you as a result
of that hearing.
See sample sketch depicting the s ?rrounding properties on the next page.
A-4
4
EXAMPLE 1 EXAMPLE 2
50' 25'25' 50' 50' 50' 50' 50'
The shaded lots on N Pacific Ocean " t
50' 50' 50' 50' 50'
each example indi- o 0
41
cate those lots 0 " o 0 0 ';
�,� r:T3
that must be noti-
fied due to the ED
11111
street
relative location � ' -
of the lots from so' So' So' So' So' o' o' o g
the applicant's - IEJ
property (100' not �` street
J_ "
including public street 50' 25125' 50' 50' 50' N z-'2 50,
easements). Lots o' 50' 1,01 501
which are only _
partially within s"� g 1 �. r,. , o o
c-
the 100' notifi-
cation distance ,, ;
have been shaded
n .•'� Ys'r. ���'� i k:a y 0 0
completely to o '
indicate that
notification is Attached to the back is a form
required. to use for the notification list .
4. Local government verification of consistency with local requirements, such as an issued
building permit, a letter or Regional Commission "Approval in Concept" form (attached)
completed by an appropriate local government official (plans must also be stamped with
the "Approval in Concept") , and, for all land divisions or condominium conversions, an
approved tentative tract map (including minutes of the Planning Commission meeting, with
conditions assigned, if any) . Any use permit or variance granted as part of this
approval as well as all conditions imposed on it must be included with the verification.
5. In addition to verification of local government approval, documentation of all other
permits, permissions or approvals applied for or granted by public agencies must be
attached to this application. All conditions imposed on these approvals must be included.
"Public agencies" include cities, counties, regional agencies, redevelopment agencies,
air pollution control district, State Regional Water Quality Control Boards, the State
Lands Commission and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Where septic systems are proposed
local health department or Regional Water Quality Control Board approval should be pro-
vided.
6. Maps and Plans:
A. Development location and vicinity maps. Maps should show precisely where the devel-
opment is proposed and present land and water uses in .the project vicinity. U.S. Geo-
logical Survey 71z minute series quadrangle map, Thomas Brothers map, road map or area
maps prepared by local governments may provide a suitable base map.
B. Assessor's parcel map.
C. Project plans (2 sets) stamped Approval in Concept, for all work proposed, including:
1) A site plan of all proposed work, including structures to be removed or demolished
(on demolitions a photograph may be submitted to show elevations) , and parking
plan. Note on site plan all significant vegetation and any trees to be removed.
2) Floor plans for all proposed buildings and elevations of all proposed structures.
Floor plans of entire existing structures are required where additions are pro-
posed. Show all dimensions on floor and elevation plans.
3) Grading and drainage plans. Grading plan should show existing and proposed
contours, state amount of proposed excavation and fill and specify any neces-
sary borrow or deposition sites. Drainage plans should show drainage pattern
for all runoff from the site, location of swales, ditches and culverts, and
specify size of all drainage structures.
4) Plans for all necessary utility service line extensions and any proposed
energy conservation measures.
A-5
5
7. A single copy of any Negative Declaration, 18 copies of any Environmental Impact Report
or Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the project. Comments of all reviewing
agencies and responses to them should be included.
`l;CTION V. DEVELOPMENT' S CONSISTENCY WITH THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT OF 1976
1. The California Coastal Act of 1976 provides in Public Resources Code Section 30604(a)
that a coastal development permit shall be issued if the Regional Commission finds that
the proposed development is in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Act
and will not prejudice the ability of the local government to prepare a local coastal
program that is in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Act. Please
explain whether the proposed development :is consistent with these requirements of law.
Use additional paper if necessary.
See attachMent #4
2. Indicate whether the proposed development is coastal-dependent, and indicate any coastal-
dependent facilities to be replaced by the proposed development.
Proposal is not coastal-dependent and displaces no coastal-
dependent activities.
3. Indicate whether the proposed development is within or in close proximity to an existing
developed area. Indicate whether the proposed development will be visually compatible
with the character of surrounding areas, and if in a special community or neighborhood,
explain how the development will protect unique local character.
Proposal is within existing urbanized area; is compatible with and
will enhance neighborhood character.
SECTION VI . CERTIFICATION
1. I hereby certify that I or my authorized representative will complete and post the
"Notice of Intent" form furnished me by this Commission in a conspicuous place on the
development property upon receipt of said notice from the Regional Commission.
2. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the information in this application
and all. attached exhibits is full, complete, and correct, and I understand that any
misstatement or omission of the requested information or of any information subsequently
requested shall be grounds for denying the permit, for suspending or revoking a permit
issued on the basis of these or subsequent representations, or for the seeking of such
other and further relief as may seem proper to he Commission.
ignatur of Applicant(s) or Agent
Floyd . Belsito , City Administrator
SECTION VI I . AUT HORI ZATI ON OF AGENT
I hereby authorize to act as my representative
and bind me in all matters concerning this application.
Signature of Applicant(s)
(The information requested in PART B THAT IS APPLICABLE to the proposed
development must be provided by the applicant .
A-6
6
PART A ATTACHMENTS
Y ATTACHMENT 1
Section III Project Description
1. All incidental improvements . . .
The Project requires:
- extension of water and sewer from surrounding streets to
property.
- extension of water for two new fire hydrants.
- extension of natural gas, electricity and telephone from
surrounding streets to property.
- all utilities to be underground.
- no extension of streets will be required.
Site clearance requires:
- removal of four municipal buildings: Community Clinic,
Memorial Hall (now used as warehouse) , Fire Station (now
used for offices) , and an abandoned administration building.
- Clinic and offices will be relocated to another City-owned
building and relocation assistance will be' provided to Clinic .
5. Nature of proposed development . . .
The project includes residential, commercial and public recrea-
tion facilities as follows:
- residential
- apartments for the elderly financed by the California Housing
Finance Agency and at least 49 percent of which will receive
Section 8 subsidies.
Studios 10
One Bedroom 138
Two Bedroom 8
Managers (Two Bedroom) 1
157
Apartment structure will also include community recreation
space in lounge, community meeting rooms, roof gardens, green-
house and outdoor areas.
Commercial :
Within residential structure will be 4 , 000 square feet of
service commercial. Tentative uses to be cafe, convenience
market, pharmacy and beauty shop.
Site coverage for this building and its site is 43 percent.
Public Recreation:
Also to be provided on an adjacent portion of the site is a
new 10, 000 square foot senior citizens recreation center.
I
7
page 2
This facility will include meeting rooms, game room, community
assembly room, seniors feeding program, senior outreach offices,
and general center staff offices.
This is a one story building with 85 percent site coverage in-
cluding outdoor recreation areas.
The existing 9, 180 square foot Main Street Branch Library on
the site will remain; certain cosmetic improvements (paint,
landscaping) are planned to enhance the structure. The build-
ing is one story with a mezzanine and has a site coverage of
48 percent.
8
ATTACHMENT L
Section III Project Description
HOUSING (proposed)
7 . Project Height: from existing grade 40 ' 6" ft.
from average finished grade (AFG) 40 ' 6" ft.
from centerline of frontage road (CFR) 41 ' ft.
height of any structure above roofline
of highest habitable floor 12 ' ft.
8. Total number of floors including subterranean floors, lofts, and
mezzanines 4
9. Gross structural area including covered parking and accessory build-
ings (in sq. ft. ) _ 133, 367 ; gross structural area excluding
parking and accessory buildings (in sq. ft. ) 119 , 967
10. Lot area (within property lines) 87 , 494 . 0 acres or sq. ft.
Lot coverage by buildings 37, 622 sq. ft.
Total coverage by impervious surfaces 11, 535 sq. ft.
Total lot coverage including paving 49,157 sq. ft.
Landscaped and unimproved area 38 ,337 sq. ft.
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER (proposed)
7 . Project Height: from existing grade 21 ' 0" _ ft.
from average finished grade (AFG) 21 ' 0" ft.
from centerline of frontage road (CFR) 21 ' 6" ft.
height of any structure above roofline
of highest habitable floor 6 ' (skylight) ft.
8 . Total number of floors including subterranean floors, lofts, and
mezzanines 1
9. Gross structural area including covered parking and accessory build-
ings (in sq. ft. ) , 10, 589 ; gross structural area excluding
parking and accessory buildings (in sq. ft. ) 10, 589
10.• Lot area (within property lines) 39 ,842 sq. ft.
Lot coverage by buildings 10, 589 sq. ft.
Total coverage by impervious surfaces 33 , 861 sq. ft.
Total lot coverage including paving 33 ,861 sq. ft.
Landscaped and unimproved area 5, 981 sq. ft.
BRANCH LIBRARY (existing)
7 . Project Height: from existing grade 25 ' 0" ft.
from average finished grade (AFG) 25 ' 0" _ ft.
from centerline of frontage road (CFR) 25 ' 6" ft.
height of any structure above roofline
of highest habitable floor none ft.
8 . Total number of floors including subterranean floors, lofts, and
mezzanines _ 2
9. Gross structural area including covered parking and accessory build-
ings (in sq. ft. ) 9,180 gross structural area excluding
parking and accessory buildings (in sq. ft. ) 9, 180
10. Lot area (within property lines) 25, 900 sq. ft.
Lot coverage by buildings 8 , 280 sq. ft.
Total coverage by impervious surfaces 12, 295 sq. ft.
Total lot coverage including paving 12,295 sq. ft.
Landscaped and unimproved area 13 , 605 sq. ft.
9
Page A-3','- Question 19
The following discussion of alternatives to the proposed project
is quoted from "Final Environmental Impact Report EIR 79-1;
Senior Citizens Housing and Activity Center, Huntington Beach,
California, " October 1979; Pacific Environmental Services, Inc . ;
pp. XVIII - 1 and 2.
XVIII. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT
In this section, alternatives to the proposed project are evalu-
ated and the significant tradeoffs among the uses of available
alternative resources are presented. Major alternatives to the
proposed project include: (1) no project; (2) alternative siting ;
(3) alternate density; and (4) open space.
A. No Project
The proposed project site has a General Plan designation of Mixed
Development. It is underutilized since the old Memorial Building
and Fire Station have not been fully utilized for the past few
years. The Community Clinic, consisting of a portable building
and two trailers, are temporary structures currently using the
site. This alternative would effectively preclude the introduc-
tion of impacts anticipated if the propsed project were implemented .
These impacts include increased air pollution, increased traffic ,
increased on-street parking, increased noise levels, increased
surface water runoff, and a loss of open space.
The negative impacts associated with no project include a loss
of low to moderate cost housing for senior citizens.
B. Alternate Siting
This alternative evaluated the placement of the proposed project
at another site within the City of Huntington Beach.
The location and characteristic of the proposed project site
make it particularly suited to the proposed project° s concepts.
The development of the Activity Center in a centrally located area
of the City and adjacent to the Public Library will create a com-
munity oriented service. The additional provision of low to
moderate income housing at this site will intensity the viability
of the other proposed uses (i.e. , Activity Center and limited com-
mercial) . In addition to the convenient location of the site as.
it relates to centrality, the site is attractive because of its_ ;
close proximity to the beach.
Other sites with similar amenities could be sought out, but due
to the current underutilization of the proposed site acid its-
abil ,ty to accommodate the proposed project, such a search, could,
resu'lt`inf ew additional benefits.
10
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 2
C. .Alternate Density
This alternative would propose the development of the same proj-
ect with a reduced number of dwelling units. This would effec-
tively reduce the expected impacts on air quality, traffic and
circulation, and noise. A significant reduction in the number
of dwelling units would be necessary in order to alleviate the
inadequate number of parking spaces. Again, however, the benefits
of providing law-to-moderate income housing to as many senior
citizens as possible would be lost. This is particularly true
since a demand for such housing has been identified.
D. Open Space
The last major alternative would be the development of a park.
Such a proposal would require a change in the zoning of the site.
There would also be monetary costs ,to the City with this alterna-
tive. Such costs would include development of the property (i.e. ,
removal of the old Memorial Mall and Fire Station) , and the pro-
vision of personnel to maintain the park. As a park, no revenues
could be obtained from the site.
The beneficial impact of preservation and enhancement of open
space that would otherwise be lost an indefinite period of time,
if the proposed project is implemented, would be offset by the
loss of senior citizen housing and a new senior Activity Center.
In addition, the following feasible mitigation measures from
EIR 79-1 are to be included in the project:
DURING CONSTRUCTION
During the construction phase of the project there should be ade-
quate sprinkling of water in order to reduce the fugitive dust
emissions (p. VIII - 7) .
Construction and demolition activities should be limited to be-
tween the hours of 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. , Monday through Saturday.
The landscaping proposed should serve as a mitigating measure
for the expected increase in noise levels on the site (p. XI - 6) .
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
Building structures should be designed according to the state
energy conservation standards for new residential and new non-
residential buildings (p. XII - 3) .
11
ATTACHMENT 3
Page- 3
Designing all structures to maximize energy conservation should
mitigate the impact of using a nonrenewable resource. By increas-
ing structural mass and using highly insulative construction
materials, a more efficient energy use should be realized (p. XII
- 5) .
Utilization of automatic landscape watering systems during early
morning hours or during evening hours would reduce the amount of
water normally lost through evaporation. Utilization of native
and/or drought-tolerant plants would also reduce overall water
requirements. Other water conservation measures would include
low-volume water closets, and selection of plumbing fixtures which
would reduce water (p. XII - 8) .
Whenever possible, water-saving plumbing fixtures should be used
-to reduce the anticipated sewage flow (p. XII - 9) .
FIRE PREVENTION
In order to mitigate the increase in fire flow, a sprinkler
system and stand pipe system should be installed in the apartment
structure as required by City fire codes. This would also apply
to the rooms of the recreation center and the library.
Other safety measures would include the placement of smoke detec-
tors in each apartment. Also, an emergency call station should
be included in the apartment complex. Such a station would
allow each apartment dweller to push a button that would alert
the main desk. It would also be possible to tie the smoke
detectors into this unit, to notify the desk when one is activated .
Overall, a good maintenance program for the proposed development
should be implemented, in order to avoid deteriorated conditions
that would be conducive to fire outbreaks. The residents should
also be educated as to an emergency evacuation plan and general
fire prevention programs (pp. XII -- 14 and 15) .
TRANSIT
The Specific Plan should determine the transit facilities to be
provided by the proposed project. The existing bus stop along
Orange Avenue near Fifth Street should include a canopy shelter
for the convenience and comfort of the persons utilizing the
transit facilities (p. IX - 11) .
PARKING
The proposed project will be reviewed by the Coastal Commission
to assess its conformance with the policies of the Coastal Act.
12
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 4
An evaluation of the parking needs of the elderly housing portion
of the project should be made. The population characteristics
indicate that a variance in the Coastal requirement to reflect
the parking requirement of the Specific Plan could be accommodated
(pa XIV - 4)
SECURITY
The mitigation measures have been supplied to the project propo-
nents to aid in developing a private security system.
The main thrust for security considerations should be centered
around keeping non-authorized transients from entering into the
complex and wandering around at will.
Further, proper lighting around the perimeter of the complex and
within open courtyard areas would provide officers with a high
visibility of unauthorized intruders during nighttime hours (pm
XII - 13)
OUTDOOR LIGHTING
Any lighting should be shielded away from the nearby residents
(po XXII
13
p 410.791
TITLE INSURANCE
AND TRUST
Orange County Omc• 1
ON North Main Street Santa Ana, Cahtorma 92702 7 t a 547-3333
IMPORTANT
When replying refer to
• Our No. 610 410
THE WILL.IAM LYON COMPANY
366 SAN MIGUEL DRIVE, SUITE 201
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. 9266o Your No. HUNTINGTON BEACH
ATTN : BRIAN NORKORTIS CIVIC CENTER SITE
In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, Title Insurance and Trust
Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Calif-
ornia Land Title Association Standard Coverage form Policy of Title Insurance describing the land and the
estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of
any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage
pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said policy form.
This report land any supplements or amendments thereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating
the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability
be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.
Dated as of APRI L 30 19 79 , at 7:30 a.m.
FRANK D. LUE R Title Officer
The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is a fee.
Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTONV BEACH BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.
At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions contained
14
ir. • , 01ry f...... svnnlrf lei- as follows
1® ANY TAXES, BONDS OR ASSESSMENTS WILL BE REPORTED LATER.
2 . AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES
STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, SHOWN OR DEDICATED BY THE MAP
OF
SUBDIVISION : BLOCK NO. 505, GAIN STREET SECTION .
FOR m ALLEY PURPOSES.
AFFECTS a THAT PORTION SHOWN ON SAID MAP.
3. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE
PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, UPON THE TERMS,
COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN CONTAINED, AS SET FORTH IN AN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 3, 1923, IN BOOK 500 OF DEEDS AS PAGE
278.
RN FAVOR OF: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH.
FOR STREET PURPOSES.
AFFECTS THE EASTERLY 10 FEET®
r
DES CRIPTION '
ALL OF BLOCKS 405 AND 505 OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, MAIN STREET SECTION, IN
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACHD COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 3D PAGE 43 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
15
HUN//NCB/UN f3�lf(.H
041AI S7kZET sic.
eZocz cos
PECAN �iLl.9GNOL/A) AYZ-.
rso
� I W
W
73 q 60
250
O.?AAfGE � AYE
h'U/V///V47/ C.s/v U'C/-f L.r7
/0- 1 STIffZ7- SZ-CT1O1V
gzoctic 505
s
�vCo
V�
,o
5
ps
Q
7
�oPO 1.4 a♦ ®.®9
® mr 17
THIS INDMMME, viltit.0 the 28t1j. nj' J;jijiin ry ,
lo-i"(1on HUNT116TON BUCH COMPANY, a coi ;1ornt ion, !.arty of the
Ir,;t tart, mid Tho CITY OF HUNTINGTON BFACB, a i-i,inIciViol. co,*1-01'a-
jinn of me County of Oran-c, Stato of Cliliforulp , parL� of the
%ecraid part, WITNESSM11
That Oal-d PPrtY Of the first part, for end in enrin1deration
of the sum of Ton Dollars together with other Good and
valuable considerations, not heroin oxpr(—F;ed, the receipt of all
of whiah lb horaby a.oknowle4od, has remised, released and forever
quiLolalioetl, end by thet;e presents tioeq rordse, relep-se and forvver
quitclain unto the said party of t-1w Lecnt,ci !1111't, nild k,:, -'LP,
niiexecsori and ment"alitclal.thoso certain blocks, Toleces or
ol' land riiLtiato, lyixNg and bnii4, in the City t,1' lltint.liij,ton
I'l"ItIl, County of Orange, Ptnti, of rnlifornip , aticl bnuiulni' -Intl.
vollows, tn-w11,:
All of Llockt,, Four litin( red Five 4(lirt) 1111(l. 11VC !1IMIL11"t"(1 five
(1105), as leer map of Maln. Street .110etint, n!* the City of
wintiiv ton as recorded 'lit Poole 'I 1.1ni;e 49,
Recrirdiii of said Orange County, State of r.nl11't Pula
To6nttinr with all and ninijilni, the tent-rient,,;, ti-rutllorrpt.f;
t I ierpu,i to 1w1nn,6 1)1,6 or I ii a it-1 vii (, ti lipe rta I i,i.;l,
jii: the reversion cuid revernioitq, rei,ml cider .tit,' I eirai
ia ;ne,; and profits thereof, and itlno all Lhe riCIiL, L1.0c ttna Ill-
1. •rvfit., property possetision, claim nrtd t-ell
In law ns in equity, of the said party of the i*irf',t part, of, in
or to ths, said prrin-Ises and every pert and parcel Llic-reni', wit:, tile
TO RAVE AND TO HOLD, all and ar, Cie r.nitt n
In.,otlinr vilth the nprnirtenancef"' uIlt-0 tin -;.'1W Party ')V
hart io it I IL:, mitecessors and a ejs 1, ns filrovor
IN WITNESS W15=101', the nail party of the, lArrt lov'-'
the`ie proeniits to be sii)und nod ii ,! t;io-por,Av
t C
Al'
18
t,j, Its Provident aiw secibetary thereunto (In ly au t►tor_
1 .'•� '. , �t► Lhe day .incl year :'irgt above writteli.
HOIST INV- 1N BE y O 'ANY
► ' -ire s c e
At
t}e c�crett�ry.
COUNTY OF...Los...Aaga,j®*,,........111YYY
on tbfn . :L...._. ...---....day of... . .Jfkal=y...........A. D., 19.2 before me,
......... ,................-.............a Notary Public in and for the said
County and State, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally ap-
peared..........�►. ...I....Z t.GB,......... .................. .. .. ........known to me to he the
®®®'......President and...J,rVay. ..30.h4iLCk........known to me to be the
ABBt®..........Secretary of the H U N T I N G T O N BEACH COMPANY.
the Corporation that executed the within Instrument, known to me to be the per-
sons who executed the within Instrument, on behalf of the Corporation therein
named, and acknowledged to me that such Corporation executed the same.
fa WitUrgis fShtrtaf, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal
the day and year in this cer ' to Bove ten.
PrNlo in on& for .a ouatr &"Stma
k
19
} `}
,,f,2. C
jr
r �•, '�,�� �, y y� !•1 � 1�� �.r., t �. Alt
07
, � ,`+, '�1 ti;t?� t tt'17 ��?o• � !*Jt}�+1�', ;c}+�` °7 �.� .ti�yyyr�I� <., ;�'Y�1.., gin, i.
•y,'' ;;;r•,{�h,f�r,re i�'„ i''!;t. � ►r�+�e� •�'��i,� ,,.f• c ��f1 �h4 1
M►►2ky7y��{ 1 f + .' �'tgir t .. ►x '3 ti 4;,n x,,
t„Tr ' ,ry a+Y�'li'r ll(�! yY " �'''•� V ;l� t, •
,��� {f s y �J} +•.y �b .': }„ �dc
t, Pl. fir.•}
40.
ji
ac
z
IX
td r,
.. '•+, .7.«}•q}.w.i�,•.ala,. 'w•+7+^ v.'rSiA*MM'4.•� /R' '.':AMA-t,
T i
+
,P
�1
e '
,1
y
��` 20
a
\ ' ,41
g
s• r t .n J ,
cy
AVEAW
to
civic
PECAN IAMO**A aW ; AVENUE
dg405
' �a e
I
404
WNW
41
AV
cMr�wMr •
--• 14 I. •I SK•N 1. N.
-c
an+r
+43
f`Is. ..•.. .�...4:7,ti»ha. n e.. . -.._. ... 1 ,. ^ .[_` .II- I �1
Legal Owner Notification List,'
24-130-01 24-133-03
City of Huntington Beach Clip #80-11 Atithony C '.ibvatt, Jr ZR
April 22, 1980 (JH) Sawa 19515 Starfish Lane
_. ------ ----�... Huntington Bead}, Calif
00 ft. radiouss 92648
24-131-10 24-132-12 24=133-04
Lois K Brown Roderick H Freeman et al Patrick C lave
17612 De bang Circle 415 6th Street 418 Orange Avenue
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif
92649 92648 92648
24-131-12 24-132-13 24-133-06
Oscar J Rosales - Chester E Critton
7582 Appleby Drive MwbmpdbcRxHxfmm1 310 Huntington Street
Huntington Beach, Calif ZdftF&xftMMt Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 92648
24-131-15 24-132-13 24-133-07
I:ewie P Derigo William N Crawford Loran Kac
807 Vain Street Iielen R Crawford 420 5t1i Street
Huntington Beach, Calif 3367 dope Street Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 Huntington Park, Calif 90255 92648
24-131-16 24-132-14 241133-08
William C King 'Darry A 0 Dell Elizabeth Collins
507 66h Street 409 1/2 6th Street 257 S Westlake Avenue
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Los Angeles, Calif
. 92648 02948 90057
24-131-17 24-132-15 24-133-09
V S Wilson Henry Stempniak et al Manfred Lengsfeld
501 6th Street 409 6th Street 3101 Yellowsetone Drive
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Costa Mesa, Calif
92648 92648 92626
24-132--09 24-132-19 24-133-10
Virginia R George Cbmnnuii.ty Bible Church Mola Develognant Sorp
423 6th Street of Huntington Beach 417 Main Street
Huntington Beach, Calif P.O. Box 69 Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92648
24-132-10 24-133-01 24-133-11
Rebecca G Easterly Manuel 'Torres Urban Reconstruction Corp
305 N Sweet Avenue 7593 Washington Avenue 222U4 HawUiorne Blvd.
Fullerton, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 2orrance, Calif
92633 92647 905U5
24-132-11 24-133-02 24-134-01
Irene C Whitfield Douglas,] Merlin Jams Riley Fox
Irene C Lockett 412 5th Street 11783 Eton Drive
417 6th Street Huntington Beach, Calif Grand grace, Calif
Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92648 92324
24-134-U2 24-142-10
JEUIles W I-ICCzuy CUP {r 80-11 Joim C Morrow
1700 Miramar Drive April 22, 1980 (ill) P.O. Box 2784
Ixazt Beach, Calif lU0 radius Seal Beach, ,Calif
92661 90740
24-134-103 24-095-Od 24-143-01
CkLarles D Robison Zonal E Burry Sylvia. Shandrick.
402 17t1i Street wx 262 228 1/2 Main Street
Huntington Deach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 92648 92648
24-134-104 24-095-09
Robert P Mandic _ Robert R Alen
.112689 Lanakila Lane 224 3rd Street
Garden Grove, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif
92641 92648
24-172-08 24-095-10
So. Calif Edison Co. Victoria J Lane
19171 Magnolia Street 637 Frankfort Avenue
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif
92646 92648
24-172-09 24-141-08
Gun Eun Donald D Gal.itzen
526 Main Street 321 13th Street t
i ulltington beach, Calif- Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 92648
24-172-11 24-141-09
Hertha L backlund Robert J Runk
1. ,,,8861 Stilwell Drive 6469 Dos Rios Rd
Huntington Beach, Calif Downey, Calff. 90240
92646
24-171-16 24-142-01
Elmer E Goetch Larry Bailey
blU 11Iai.n Street 232 Crest Avenue
n Beach Calif Iiwiti.n ton Beach Calif
Huntington g .
92648 92648
24-171-17, 18, 1 24-142-02
General IV--lephone Co. Merle E Ca de
So. Area Market. Dept. 19381 6iorchester Lane ,
P.O. -Box 600 Huntington Beach, Calif
Long Beach, Calif 90801 92646
24-095-07 24-142-09
Joseph E DeSues Jr John C Morrow
. 609 Main Street 325 5th Street
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 92648
/ q o
23
Occupant Notification List
. r
I
Occupant Occupant Occupant
323 A 6th Street 327 6th Street 328 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
I
Occupant Occupant Occupant
401 6th Street 409 6th Street 411 6th Street I
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant _ - - - Occupant Occupant
415 6th Street 417 6th Street 421 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
i
Occupant Occupant Occupant
i
423 6th Street 501 6th Street 507 6th Street
tuntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA, 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
509 6th Street 515 6th Street 519 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
I
Occupant Occupant Occupant
1523 6th Street 525 6th Street 603 6th Street
Ilantington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant I
321 5th Street 325 5th Street 328 5th Street "
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
i
Occupant Occupant Occupant f
408 5th Street 410 5th Street 412 5th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
416 5th Street 411 Main Street 417 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
i
24
Occupant Occupant Occupant
419 Main Street 420 Main Street 428 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
438 Main Street 440 Main Street 504 A Main Street
Huntington beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
i
Occupant Occupant Occupant
504 B Main Street 504 C Main Street 504 D Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Such, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
504 E Main Street 504 F I-lain Street 522 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 t
Occupant Occupant Occupant
526 A Main Street 538 I1ain Street G02 rain Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92643 Iuntington Beach, CA 92648 I'Iunti.ngton Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
605 Main Street 607 Main Street 609 Main Street e
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupxant Occupaant Occupant
617 Main Street 418 Orange Avemue r
IIunt' ton Beach CA 92643 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 -T r' n Street
� � Iuntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant
416 Orange Avenue 319 A 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
25
CITY OF
HUN"flN(-T' T(-')N BEACH AL
_,..�.,._
L -
ORANCF COUNTY , CALIFORNIA i R.visod3-'-'9
Ves
FIRE
1 l
dJy .y 10 toe STA
10 L<t. 10 601
V 1 y J a1U V Jy )s,
y,,� ,•� L S v dl \
9vv von \\ „�`L S 3 fv\ ) dr\ al
't\ ,t�� ✓i/� y\J� y , ' -Sig' S<�U,S\ ^, � dr),\6 -! �q
610
\,,y,�s f' ✓ ✓j ✓ v� �� tJs,,d y�'7 , `;4��� �Oj � 602
l
n �s
✓ �, f V� y,✓L7 �� r'� �'9 S1 I
o v
.' \ ''J `v LI aJV t't' SJS 538 tnvm
529
�1.' l aJ, ✓`\� \\ by goo,
\
\� ✓ llr)\ 50413 i
79 ,d 417 428
LU-
�? ✓`r\ )S �� 4 2 7
)O \ J S 4�B 4 4 24
lot� 421
410
f; Jr
\ r ,Q �.
,
\ d� � �� e� �� \ k t�5*O• 1S' � 1
1, v <
\ In
AN el
\ i
c-;)
Jh
451
BR
STATE Of CALIFORNIA EDM ND U G. BROWN 1 R.,Go ern or
CALIFORNIA* COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION
666 E. OCEAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 3107
P.O. Box 1450 APPROVAI. IN CONCEPT
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801
(213) 590 5071 (714) 846 0648
APPROVAL IN CONCEPT BY THE CITY/GB414TY OF Huntington Beach
as required for permit application to the California Coastal Commission,
South Coast Region pursuant to California Administrative Code, Section 13052 .
COMPLETE Description of Proposed Development : 157 unit senior housing project
financed by California Housing Finance Agency; 10 , 000 sq ft. senior citi-
zen Recreation Center, 4 , 000 sq. ft. service com' l, parking & landscaping
for above.
Property Address : Housing : 401 Fifth St. Senior Center: 501 Fifth St.
Legal Description: All of Blocks 405 & 505 of Hunt. Bch. , Main St. Section
City of H.B. ; Co. of Orange; St. of Calif; Book 3 , pg . 43 of misc . maps,
office of the Co. Recorder.
Zone : Old Civic Center Specific Plan
Applicant (s) : City of Huntington Beach
Applicant ' s Mailing Address : P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Applicant ' s Telephone Number: (714) 536-5542
I have reviewed the plans for the foregoing development including:
1. The general site plan, including any roads and public access to the
shoreline ,
2. The grading plan, if any,
3. The general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the
area covered in the application,
and find,
They comply with the current adopted Huntington Beach
City -a- Gain
General Plan , Zoning Ordinance , Subdivision Ordinance , and any
applicable specific or precise plans.
A copy of any variance, exception, conditional use permit , or other issued
permit is attached together with all con Titions ot approval and all approved
plans including approved tentative tract maps . On the basis of this finding ,
these plans are approved in concept and said approval has been written upon
said plaris , signed , and dated.
27
Should this City or County adopt an ordinance deleting, amending, or adding
to the Zoning Ordinance or other regulations in any manner that would affect
the use of the property or the design of a project location thereon, this
approval in concept shall become null and void as of the effective date of
this said ordinance .
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 , and
State and local guidelines adopted thereunder, this development :
Has been. determined to be ministerial or categorically exempt .
Has received a final ExemFtion Declaration for final Negative
Declaration (copy attached) .
X Has received a final Environmental Impact Report (copy attached) .
This concept approval in no way excuses the applicant from complying with
all applicable policies , ordinances , codes , and regulations of this City
or County.
THE APPROVAL IN CONCEPT STAMP MUST BE AFFIXED ON ALL SUBMITTED PLANS,
THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE IN ADDITION TO THE APPROVAL IN CONCEPT FORM
THAT IS NOW REQUIRED.
I hereby certify that all information contained in this approval in
concept is correct and that all discretionary approvals legally required
of this City or County prior to issuance of a building permit have been
given and are final. The development is not subject to rejection in prin-
cipal by this City or County unless a substantial change in it is proposed.
Director of Development Services
D
By:
James W. Palin
Director of Development Services
Printed Name and Title of Individual Signing
Date :
Attachments :
I. Conditional Use Permit
Z • Plans
3 . Environmental Impact Report
4.
28
Nuntingtol Beach Pl,naing Commissiow
P.O. SOX 190 CALIFORNIA rZtN
Date: Icy 7,, 1980
NOTICE OF ACTION
Applicant: The William Lyon Company
Subject: Conditional Use Permit No. 80-11
Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Com-
mission on Dtay 6, 1980 and your request was:
WITHDRAWN
APPROVED
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X (See attached)
DISAPPROVED
CONTINUED UNTIL
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action
taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed to
the City Council by you or an interested party. Said appeal must be
in writing and must set forth in detail the action and grounds by and
upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved.
Said appeal must' be accompanied by a filing fee of seventy-five ($75 .00)
dollars and submitted to the City Clerk's office within ten (10) days
of the date of the Commission' s action.
in your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing
fee is may 168 1980
Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any
application becomes null end void one (1) yiar after final approval ,
unless actual construetioi, has started.
vary truly yo
j
JLimrs W. 1)alin
Ac�ti.n(I Secretary
29
•
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
\« P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
C'ONDI'1'IONAL USE PERMIT NO. 80-11
Applicant: The William Lyon Company
19 Corporate Plaza
Newport Beach, Californi.a 92660
Request: To permit the construction of a 157
unit senior housing project and 4 , 000
square feet of commercial building .
Location: The subject property is located on
a parcel bounded by Main, 5th and 6th
Streets and Orange Avenue.
Date of Approval : May 6, 1980
FINDINGS :
1 , The proposed 157 unit senior citizen housing complex complies with
all applicable provisionsof the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code
and specifically Article 914 , the Old Civic Center Specific Plan.
2 . The General Plan sets forth provisions for this type of land use as
well as setting forth objectives for implementation of this type of
housing .
3 . The Planning Commission has received the staff report and all pertin-
ent information submitted to them for their deliberation .
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1 . The site plan received and dated March 25, 1980 shall be the approved
layout.
2 . . `.I'he floor plans and elevations received and dated March 25, 1980
shall be the approved floor plans and elevations .
3 . The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions set forth .in
the approved and signed participation agreement between the City of
Huntington Beach and the William Lyon Company .
4 . Fire protection system, including automatic sprinkler system, stand-
pipe system, fire hydrants , fire alarm system, and any other required .
fire protection and detection devices or systems shall comply with
the specifications of the Iluntington Beach Fire Coda . Plans for such
systems and devices shall be submitted to the Fire Department and shall
be subject to approval by the Departments of Fire. and Public Works .
5 . Natural gas and 220V electrical, shall be stubbed in at the location
.of clothes dryers .
30
M-1j F, , 1980-
Page 2
6 . Low-volume heads shall be used on all indoor showers .
7 . A11 building spoils , such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other
surplus or unusable material , shall. be disposed of at an offsite
facility equipped to handle them.
8 . The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached ,
shall be constructed in compliance with the state acoustical stand-
ards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the
property . Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an
acoustical, a-nalysis report prepared under the supervision of a person
experienced in the field of acoustical engineering ; such report shall
be submitted with the application for building permits . All measures
recommended to mitigate noise to acceptable levels shall be incor-
porated into the design of the project.
9 : If lighting is included in the parking lot, energy efficient lamps
shall be used (e.g . , high-pressure sodium vapor, metal halide) . All
outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto ad-
jacent properties .
10 . A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils
engineer. This analysis shall include onsite soil sampling and
laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations
regarding grading, chemical and fill properties , foundations ,
retaining walls, streets, and utilities .
11 . A plan for silt control for all storm runoff from the property dur-
ing construction and during initial operation of the project shall
be submitted to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board
staff for its review prior to the issuance of grading permits .
12 . The applicant shall provide a solar-assisted hot water system for
the entire proposed residential project. If the applicant subse-
quently can provide information to the Director of Development
Services proving that the solar system is not economically feasible
at the time of construction, this condition may be waived and a gas-
fired central hot water system shall be installed .
13.. The developer shall provide individual cable television hook-ups to
each residential dwelling unit within the complex at the time of
construction.
I hereby certify that Conditional Use Permit No . 80-11 was approved by
the F'.lanning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach , California , on
May 6 , 1980 upon the foregoing conditions and citations .
Very truly yours,
/Jam(.�-_tW.. PalIn
rear.-y
:df
31
Z£
- i
i
I .ru.• ,' °� \ .F \\.y,., sly ,p2
�1. � � ,�..� I ,I �`•, I 1 r r'� F� i
E r , � I ,Ir �., I � , •I 1
GOLDFN � wFsr st° r
S(
nol I r
a Hum SI
,fit �� .I�o i r I I Ni 1 1„Ilml{r Inn sl I'- i
rna a s, I � �I. � ,. UNllfl IUP, sT
., S i ( xx.1a1
OELAW APE
-ST
!r I �' v` J rl I•i ti�n I i ', r : —., i I t 1.I,r, , I'`I,
y. °. HFACH F HLVDI `HFACN nruu HLVD I
d.e.s 1 fl
■I i
H,,
f z � I �,, � • 1
I
n�
r�
1 =� F
1
I.. C/l' I r;;'Nlovislrn�rl I-J I, I i� ,.,r I ,�• � �,.� y'`.i l L tr s•1 �
I � t
,
v
1 I•'J
- yI 11I f I(I
�L1vl� ..i 4, e •� > .,,I.� }, M, H.h�, Y n} ,Yll }�, ,�r 1�I�.I �t i I �•,i Ih I t •;� y Y 1 I..
1 ,
MAGN00X 1s
0
JAInCIA
fi1� � � � �.'�� � Im _.i i. �,�I,�. n .�.; .�.Ji I i.r nl ll�•,�� � i .�d.r -� ir�r °rl. f ��..� I. �..�� m t
b i i } r` r � I + �, �j d•YT• I f•.I•-� I , � .ly r �I
I aus,llao IT u
� I �
„� �� }j I• � �� •' I t . 1 , _ { ,, c� :c� .,s� <� IP �� I" � `S I ,�.� � �'r I ,is r-F�/. .. i
HROOKHURST ST o i ■.', c ; ( l
.i 't ` � r- � •,� 9' , '. of I � � f _
• � I
r
dVN NOIIVDO'I V9
,r
••••..►0.0.9 ►•11A1• eR
•.•,•
�t1•f•iN•'1 •
Lf�1•R•+I+RII�Rti
:�i�i�i�i�i .�.���►;►;►� •••1•••1.1.1.1�1.1.1�
•.._n ►,r �RRRRRRR RRRI �a
;���i�i�i�i� � 111�•�Y•1 1
••f1•�h1n
i . ►•� /•11••IIf1•
��.►;.►.. ► P.•.•.H.•
/1R•1
....... 1••Y1�1 is
�If11.111 4
••'f•1'f�1�1
�,Ii1i•�R•1
•
!•9!IS4!�;�!13
1♦ 1
1.1.1A�.1.•.•.R•�
1 ....... � '1'1•17D'11�1
�Y•�•1�•'1•YY•IYI 1•111••'•11•1•••••••1
\ •,•.1.1.1.1.•.1.1•.1. y f•1�!1��
51
�j;i\� �i1i1i1i1•IiilQilili i1i1:L1i.•1:1:1�❖:
:1;•�I�Q�:❖:1�❖�1 1�•!•!•!1!1!•!1!f!1�1
* • f • f
i
i
`� `ems'- , � ,, / 91 �� ��e`'•.
606
4;AC/A AVENUE '
/^1
lb
_.� CIVIC \ 1
— fi= AL 505
• N J AVENUE
PECAN (MA6kO:W AVE) q
JAL- _ w to
-1
CENTER
-T 13 405 .� p� 136
14 I -- q---- --
,.A
r b 4 ~54 -
I
ea
A9ANCf ,
x
r' 8 ZO 's.
81 ,i._.
3 t 1_._ .—..-._.. _ ..iO.� -..
i
.
1 _ 1 I 14
_ -
�.--}}��{���---ems —
'.srt,ei
15
16 1! r 17 i71' 6 is 1T l
-` 14 4
OL/VE
34 — —' 1. as r,•
i
ATTACHMENT #4
SECTION V, QUESTION #1
The proposal is consistent with all goals and policies
as expressed in Chapter Three of the California Coastal
Act; and will contribute toward implementation of the
Public Access Policy (30213 . Development of Low Cost
Housing Facilities) .
The intention of this proposal is not to prejudice the
ability of the City in anyway to prepare a Local Coastal
Program and no evidence of such has been noted.
i
i
35
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION
666 E. OCEAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 3107
f O BOX 1450
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801 PART B
213) 590-5071 (714) 846.0648
The inform-tion requested in PART B that is applicable to the proposed development must be
provided by the- applicant. In cases of dispute, the determination of the Executive Director
of the Regional Commission (or the Commission) shall be final as to the applicability of a
question to a particular development.
1. Where grading is proposed - Describe the proposed grading, including the amount of grad-
ing to be performed (in cu. yds.) , the amount of cut, amount of fill,, amount of import
or export, location of borrow or disposal site, and the maximum height of fill or cut
slopes. Describe how grading will be conducted so as to minimize the alteration of
landforms and to minimize erosion during and after construction.
N/A
2. For development on a bluff face, bluff top or in an area of high geologic risk - A cam-
' prehensive, site-specific geology and soils report must be submitted, in accordance
with the Interpretive Guidelines adopted by the Commission on Geologic Stability of
Bluff-Top Development (copies of the guidelines are available at the Regional Commission
offices) . For development in the South Coast Region, this specifically includes, but is
not .limited to, the following areas: Santa Monica Mountains, Pacific 'Palisades, Palos
Verdes Hills, Orange County Coastal Hills, and all development to be constructed within
50 feet of the ocean bluff edge of the property. For applications in Malibu, submit, a
Geologic Review Sheet from Los Angeles County. For applications in Laguna Beach, South
Laguna and Laguna Niguel, a geology report must be submitted with each application.
0
3. Where diking, filling or dredging are proposed - Does the development involve diking,
filling or dredging of open coastal waters, wetlands, estuaries or lakes? ' What alterna-
tives are available? How.will the adverse environmental effects of this be 'minimized?
_N/A
4. Where septic systems. are proposed - Evidence of percolation tests and soils/drainage
tests are required. N/A
5. Where applicable - Will the development extend onto or adjoin any beach, tidelands, sub-
merged .lands or public trust lands? For projects on State-owned lands the applicant
may be required to submit a legal description of the parcel, tied to a monument or monu-
ments of record and a detailed plan or plat of existing and proposed structures showing
the location of the structure(s) with respect to property lines.
_. IV/A
6. Where applicable - Will the development protect existing lower cost visitor and recrea-
tional facilities? Will it provide public recreational. opportunities? r
The proposed Senior Citizens Recreation Center will improve recrea-
tional opportunities for a (B-1 ) segment of the population.
36
7, . Where applicable - Will the development protect or provide low and moderate income
housing opportunities? Will it displace low or moderate income housing? A copy of
local housing elements may be required.
The project will provide additional low and moderate income rental
housing within the Coastal Zone without displacing any existing housings
8> , Where demolition and/or removal of exist'.ng structures are proposed - Whas: is the type
and age of any structure to be demolished' What is the destination of any structure to
be removed? Does any structure to be demolished or removed have any historical signifi-
cance? For demolitions, the following may be required: (a) an estimate of the costs of
repairing or rehabilitating those structures to be demolished; and (b) a report of the
feasibility or repair or rehabilitation by the State Department of Housing and Community
Development or of the feasibility of moving any structures to another site.
1) Memorial Hall: unreinforced masonry, 50Y yrs; 2) Fire Station: con-
crete & frame 50-: yrs; 3) Administration Building: wood frame & stucco
60+ yrso 4) Clinic : wood frame, 10 yrs. Buildings are of no historical
i I" .�an
9. Whereapplicable - Will the development maintain, enhance, or conflict with iic access
to the shoreline and along the coast? Is public access currently available near the
sitL2? Cf so, indicate the type and location of the nearby access.
N/A
10. Where applicable - Will alternatives to private vehicle use be provided or facilitated?
How will the development affect traffic on coastal access roads? In certain cases traf-
fic counts or traffic studies may be required to provide this informari.on. An analysis
of the availability of parking in the project area may be required.
OCTB seycvice available at site; seniors "Dial-a-ride" to be available
at new senior citizens center.
11. Where the development will interfere with the line of sight to and along the ocean and
in scenic coastal areas from any public road, or public viewing point. - Indicate the
extent of interference. Describe any signs existing on or proposed for the subject pro-
perty; describe the design, size and location of each sign.
N/A
12. Where applicable - Is the development proposed within or adjoining land suitable for
agriculture? Will it convert agricultural land to another use? How is the project con-
sistent with continued local agricultural viability? Will the project adversely impact
agricultural production? What mitigation measures are proposed? The following may be
required: (a) an analysis of the soil types on the site; (b) an analysis of the extent
of prime agricultural soils on the site; and (c) an indication as to whether the land
has been in agricultural production within the last 5 years.,
N/A
13. Does the site contain any historic or pre-historic (including fossil) resources? How
will the project mitigate any adverse impact on these resources?
NZA
'B-2
37
14. Where applicable - Is the development proposed near sensitive habitat areas, 100-year
flood plain, park or recreation areas? How will the project design prevent adverse
environmental impacts on these areas?
N/A
15. Where applicable - How will the development affect the biological productivity of
coastal waters?
N/A
16. In addition to the maps and plans required in PART A, Section IV, the following shall be
required where applicable:
A. For .land divisions in the Central and South Coast Regions - To determine the average
size of the surrounding parcels, submit County Engineer house numbering maps of all
legally subdivided parcels lying all or in part within one-quarter mile perimeter of the
proposed land division. For each parcel indicate total acreage or portion thereof.
This may be expressed in square feet.
B. For properties in the South Coast Region fronting the water (ex-ept Redondo Beach,
Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach and El Porto) - Submit a dimensione, —ot plan drawn to
scale (1/8"=1° or 1"=10°) delineating the proposed development in relationship to adja-
cent developed parcels (plot all Lndeveloped parcels between the proposed and next
developed site) . On the seaward side of the projects (proposed and adjacent) detail the
following: pile and foundation locations, structural walls, decks, and roof extensions
(overhangs) . Dimensions which relate to the seaward extension of the projects (proposed
and adjacent) must be referenced to the landward property line.
17. In addition to the local government approvals required in PART lion IV, the follow-
ing local governmental approvals shall, be required where applicable:
A. Planned residential development approval.
B. Zoning change approval.
C. Approval of a general site plan including such matters as delineation of roads and
public easement(s) for shoreline access.
D. A final Environmental Impact Report (18) , or a Negative Declaration, as required
including:
1) the explicit consideration of any proposed grading;
2) explicit consideration of alternatives to the proposed development; ano
3) all comments and supporting documentation submitted to the lead agency.
E. Approval of dredging and filling of any water areas.
F. Approval of general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the area
covered by the application, as permitted by the applicable local general plan, zoning
requirements, height, setback or other land use ordinances.
G. In geographic areas specified by the Executive Director of the Commission or Regional
Commission, evidence of a commitment by local government or other appropriate entity to
serve the proposed development at the time of completion of the development, with any
necessary municipal or utility services designated by the Executive Director of the
Regional Commission or Commission.
li. A local government coastal development permit issued pursuant to the requirements of
Chapter 7 of the Commission's regulations.
I. Private or public architectural review committee approval.
B--3
38
I
J. In Palos Verdes and San Clemente for any application for more than one unit per
:Lot - Architectural Review Board approval.
K. In Malibu for applications seaward of Pacific Coast Highway and applications for
more than one unit per lot landward of Pacific Coast Highway - verification of the
County Health Department approval.
L. In Malibu - Evidence of Final Certificate of Compliance from the County (no condi-
tional or approval in concept certificates of compliance are acceptable) .
18. Where public works projects are proposed - What is the jurisdiction of the service area?
What is the method of financing for the proposed development? The applicant may be
required to submit a copy of the financing plan, as well as an analysis of the projects
impact on both taxes and assessed value of vacant property within the service area.
N/A
19. Where port and port-related projects are proposed, provide supporting documents in
answering the following questions. N/A
A. What increases in slip or barge traffic are proposed?
B. Will the project result in a change in the capacity of the shoreside hL-A.Ling
facilities?
C. Does the project involve the handling of hazardous materials?
D. What contingency plans have been developed to deal with emergency events in the
project area?
E. Will the project result in an increase in truck or rail traffic?
F. What alternative sites have been evaluated for the proposed project?
G. Is the proposed use water-dependent?
H. What size vessels will utilize the proposed project and with what frequency?
I. Does the project require a permit or permits from an air quality management agency?
J. Will the project result in any process or non-process discharge to open waters?
K. Does the existing facility have a terminal operations plan?
L. What special training will operators of the facility receive?
M. What is the term of the existing or proposed lease?
N. Will the project result in the displacement or abandonment of any existing petroleum
related operation?
0. Will the project result in the displacement of any existing recreation activity,
including recreational boating?
P. Will the development :impact on any habitat area?
Q. What pipeline or other transportation networks will the development be integrated
with?
R. Will the development involve the use of any open flame source or be sited near
operations utilizing open flame sources?
S. Will the development need any Federal authorizations?
B-4
39
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
l
I
I
1
I
PART B ATTACHMENTS
AtMt&
i
I
i
I
I
i
i
i
I
i
i
i
i
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
At
Huntington act Planning Commission
P.O. ®®x too CALIFORNIA 926
Date : December 5 , 1979
NOTICE OF ACTION
Applicant : Dept. of Development Services
Subject: Old Civic Center - Specific Plan 79-1/EIR 79-1
Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Com-
mission on December 4 , 1979 and your request was:
WITHDRAWN
X APPROVED f ndati on to the City r` :ncil
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS (See attached)
DISAPPROVED
CONTINUED UNTIL
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action
taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an ape, '. is filed to
the City Council by you or an interested party. Said appeal must be
in writing and must set forth in detail the action and grounds by and
upon which the applicant or .interested party deems himself aggrieved .
Said appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of seventy-five ($75 . 00)
dollars and submitted to the City Clerk ' s office within ten (10) days
of the date of the Commission ' s action.
in your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing
gee is
Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any
application becomes null end void one (1) year after final approval ,
unless actual constructioi, has started .
Very t ru 1 } yi
C `j
ZSec:re,tary
40
fPage #4 - Council Minutes - 1/7/80
Peggy Williams, representing the Women's Transitional Living Center, addressed
Council in regard to the center's needs, explaining their functions and the
various programs offered. She informed Council that the W.T.L.C. had submitted
y a Letter of Intent requesting $16,200 from the Sixth Year Housing and Community
Development block grant funding program. This money would be used toward the
purchase of a larger facility, she explained; even with a grant from HUD of
' $300,000, the center would still need a further $300,000 for purchase of a
facility. Peggy Williams urged Council to consider the request for $16,200, being
in her opinion, a fair percentage for the assistance rendered to Huntington Beach
residents. She answered various questions raised by Council .
Carol Rouillard, Executive Director of the Orange County Fair Housing Council re-
ferred to t e City's first contract for Fair Housing Services under the 5th Year
Program, in the amount of $10,000. She urged Council to renew this contract for
the current year, explaining the benefits to the City of their basic services and
the problems experienced by citizens eligible for such funding.
i
Brenda Premo, resident and member of the Housing and Coriimunity Development Committee,
also Executive Director of the Dayle MacIntosh Center addressed C_ ,cil particularly
regarding disabled persons within the community who would benefit from Housing and
L Community Development funds. She commended the City on what had been done within
the past three years in terms of access for the disabled, and spoke of the special
needs of low-income disabled persons within the City. Ms. Pr mo urged Council to
adopt a policy of setting aside one-tenth of HCD and HUD funds and even funds from the
City's General Fund, for low income housing or apartments being built to be fully
accessible to persons with mobility or orthopedic disabilities.
There being no one further present to speak on the matter, and there being no
further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor,
Councilman Mandic suggested that the matter be continued to the January 21 , 1980
Council meeting. Considerable discussion was held by Council regarding various needs
which they felt had not been given due consideration. Councilman Pattinson suggested
that the matter should be considered by Council at their forthcoming retreat, to be
held on Saturday, January 19, 1980. It was mutually agreed that one hour would be
given to the study of the matter. The motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING - OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN #79-1 & EIR #79-1 - APPROVED - ORD
NO 2410 - INTRODUCTION-'APFROVED �Y
Mayor MacAllister announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing
on Old Civic Center Specific Plan No. 79-1 Amendment to the zoning ordinance and
Environmental Impact Report No. 79-1 . Said Amendment would change the zoning from
PC-C (Public Facility-Civic) to Old Civic Center Specific Plan, which would permit
residential , commercial and public facilities on the 3.64 acre site generally
'bounded by Main Street, 5th Street, Orange Avenue, 6th Street, and generally known
as. the "Old Civic Center Site" .
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for publication and posting had
been met and that she had received no communications or written protests to the
matter.
Steve Kohler, Senior Housing and Community Development Specialist, with tf. yid of
a viewgraph referred to the Specific Plan. He introduced Pat Norkaitis of til,
William Lyon Company, who referred to the project explaining that it was the sa-e as
was presented to Council in April , 1979. 1
Page #5 --.Council Minutes -IM1/80
The Senior Housing and Community Development Specialist briefed Council on past
action on the matter.
Mayor MacAllister declared the hearing open.
i
There being no one to speak on the matter, and there being no protests filed, either
i
oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor.
j The Clerk was directed to read Ordinance No. 2410 by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY ADDING
I THERETO NEW ARTICLE 914 ENTITLED, "OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN."
Or motion by Bailey, second Yoder, Council approved said change of zone, certified
that EIR #79-1 complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act and approved the Old Civic Center Specific Plan No. 79-1 and approved introduc-
tion of Ordinance No. 2410 by unanimous vote.
CODE AMENDMENT #79-6 - APPROVED - ORD NO 2411 - STREET INTERSECTION VISIBILITY,
OLDTOWN T WNLOTS - INTRODUCTI N APPROVED
Mayor MacAllister announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing
to consider Code Amendment No. 79-6, initiated by the Planning Commission. Code
Amendment No. 79-6 proposed a change in Division 9 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance
Code to clarify, modify and require the 25' by 25' corner cut-off in all districts.
This code requirement prohibits any structure between 42' and 7' in height within
a 25' triangular area at exterior property lines.
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notifi-a{-inn, publication
and posting had been met and that she had received no communications or written pro-
tests to the matter.
Mayor MacAllister declared the hearing open.
Layne Neugart, City, referred to the proposed code amendment and urged that some
flexibility be built into the ordinance, giving reasons for his opinion.
There being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no further
protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor.
Discussion was held between Council and staff on the matter.
The Clerk was directed to read Ordinance No. 2411 by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY REPEALING
SECTIONS 9103.4.1 , 9163.4.1 , 9204.2, 9233.4.2, 9603.4.1 , 9604.2 AND 9775.3, AMEND-
ING SECTIONS 9156.4(c) AND 9356.4(c) , AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS 9103.4.1 , 9156.4.1 ,
9163.4. 1 , 9204.2. 9233.4.2. 9356.4. 1 . 9603.4 1 AND 9775.3 ALL PFRTAININr, TO ST U FT
- INTERSECTION VISIBILITY IN THE OLDTOWN RI , R�, R3, R4 TOALOT, RA DISTRICTS AND
GENERAL YARD PROVISIONS. "
On motion by Mandic, second Finley, Council approved Code Amendment #79-6 and
introduction of Ordinance No. 2411 . The motion carried by the following vote:
Oo AYES: Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
�' NOES: Pattinson
ABSENT: Thomas
42
,url�i 1 Minutes - 1/21/80
ORDINANCES ADOPTED
On motion by Bailey, second Pattinson, Council directed the Clerk to read Ordinance
Nos. 2410, 2411 and 2413 by title and adopted same by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Pattinson, Thomas, Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ORD NO 2410 - ADOPTED - "OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN"
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY ADDING THERETO NEW ARTICLE 914 ENTITLED, "OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN."
ORD NO 2411 - ADOPTED - STREET INTERSECTION VISIBILITY
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY REPEALING SECTIONS 9103.4.1 , 9163.4.1 , 9204.2, 9233.4.2, 9603.4.1 , 9604.2 AND
9775.3, AMENDING SECTIONS 9156.4(c) AND 9356.4(c) , AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS 9103.4.1 ,
9156.4.1 , 9163.4.1 , 9204.2, 9233.4.2, 9356.4.1 , 9603.4.1 AND 9775.3, AL' --RTAII'ING
TO STREET INTERSECTION VISIBILITY IN THE OLDTOWN Rl , R2, R3, R4 TOWNLOT, RA DISTRICTS
AND GENERAL YARD PROVISIONS."
ORD NO 2413 ADOPTED - ZONE CASE NO 75-10 - BEACH/RONALD
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD ON NORTH SIDE OF RONALD ROAD (7nmr CASE NO 75-10) . "
ORD NO 2412 ADOPTED - REDUCTION IN STREET WIDTH - LAKE STREET
At the request of Councilman Mandic, Ordinance No. 2412 was removed from the agenda
for separate consideration.
The Clerk was directed to read Ordinance No. 2412 by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING
DISTRICT MAP DM 12 TO INCLUDE PRECISE PLAN NO. 79-4 TO REDUCE THE WIDTH OF LAKE
STREET BETWEEN INDIANAPOLIS AVENUE AND ORANGE AVENUE."
On motion by Pattinson, second Mandic, Council approved introduction of Ordinance
No. 2414 by the following vote:
AYES: Pattinson, Thomas, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
NOES: Mandic
ABSENT: None
ORD- NO- 2414 - INTRODUCTION APPROVED - LAKE STREET ALIGNMENT
The Clerk was directed to read Ordinance No. 2414 by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING
DISTRICT MAP 12 TO INCLUDE PRECISE PLAN NO 79-2 TO ALIGN LAKE STREET BETWEEN ORANGE
AND WALNUT AVENUES, AND ATLANTA AVENUE BETWEEN DELAWARE AND LAKE STREETS. "
43 a ' �
ATTACEMENT #6
as
ORDINANCE NO. 2410
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE
BY ADDING THERETO NEW ARTICLE 914 ENTITLED,
"OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN"
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code is hereby
amended by adding thereto new Article 914 entitled , "Old Civic
Center Specific Plan" to read as follows:
9140. DEFINITIONS. The following words and p,._ -ses , used
in this article , shall have the meaning specified below:
( a) Specific man shall mean the Old Civic Center Specific
Plan as set forth in this article , and as depicted on Maps 1 and
2 contained in this article.
(b) Screening walls shall mean any nonload -ing walls.
Where such walls are not part of a habitation , not more than 60
percent of such walls shall be constructed of an opaque material.
( c) Interior setback shall mean those setbacks required
between Site I and Site II as shown on Map 2 at the end of this
article.
9141. OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC .PLAN ESTABLISHED. There
is hereby established an Old Civic Center Specific Plan, generally
located in that area bounded by Main Street on the north , Fifth
Street on the east , Orange Avenue on the south and Sixth Street
on the west , as shown on Map 1, and more particularly described
as:
Block 405 , Parcel 2; Block 505 , Parcel 1 ;
city of Huntington Beach, as recorded in
Book 24 , page 13 , records of the Assessor ,
County of Orange , and that portion of
Pecan Avenue between Fifth and Sixth Streets.
1.
JG:bc
9/11/79
44
MAP 1
y R2 t
wiaor aacrK � O
Kw uq. '
rcTiar�1 r
;r ✓ �< R3 R2 RP R
V � r
A
R 3 R3 Q
p Q H,`1,"Sao
y
t�fGC1 NE VA
/ Z
�f
• ? G O U iA
J.-
T !.
4{• b El-
In
A M z tRdT
L
a
iL
C3 G 14 ,ti G'9 <
G
C. er RAI.TWORE
/
C
pC C3 G C.. ,y AT LANSA
i
9142. ADMINISTRATION OF PLAN. Proposed development in
Site I of this specific plan , as depicted on Map 2 at the end
of this article , shall be subject to approval of a conditional
use permit , pursuant to the requirements contained in Article 984
of this code.
9142. 1 MINOR MODIFICATION. Any minor modification to an
approved conditional use permit shall be submitted in writing to
the Director, describing the exact modification deemed necessary
and the reasons therefor. If the Director finds that the minor
modification applied for is such that a substantial alteration
will occur to the plot plan, relied upon by the city in approving
the application for a conditional use permit , he shall inform
the developer that a new application for a conditional use permit
2.
45
Is required , pursuant to the provisions contained in Article 984
of this code.
9143. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. All provisions for
development contained in this code shall be met with respect to
any proposed development in the specific plan except where a con-
flict exists , the following development standards shall take
precedence:
( a) Building height shall not exceed the limitations estab-
lished for each specific site , except that such limitations shall
not include the height of chimneys, flagpoles , scenery lofts ,
ornamental towers , spires , domes , cupolas , parapet walls not ex-
ceeding four (4) feet , rooftop mechanical equipment , solar-heating
apparatus, or other similar appurtenances.
( b) Pedestrian walkways shall be provided throughout the
specific plan area.
( c) Perimeter setback requirements for the specific site
shall apply to all structures over forty-two ( 42) inu,les in height
with the exception of screening and perimeter walls.
(d) Signs shall conform to the regulations contained in
Article 976 of this code.
( e) Parking requirements shall conform to the specific
regulation's—for Site I and Site II , which sites are r..-iwn on Map 2
at the end of this article.
( f) Landscaping , irrigation and screening plans shall be
provided by a licensed architect or a landscape architect which
shall be approved by the Director prior to issuance of any
building permit. Further, all landscaping , irrigation systems
and screening shall be installed before final inspection is
made. All landscaping shall be equivalent to or better than that
presently found in the specific site area.
(g) Perimeter setbacks shall be landscaped except driveway
entrances.
( h) Refuse collection areas shall be enclosed or screened
by opaque materials and desTgn_e_c7_so that such areas are not
readily visible from access streets or any adjacent property.
Refuse container areas shall not be located within the required
setback, and all such refuse collection areas shall be landscaped
to a width of at least three (3) feet except where accessways
are provided.
( i) On-site utility services shall be placed underground
except electrical lines in excess of 12KV. All transformers
3.
46
and terminal equipment shall be screened from view from adjacent
streets and properties.
( j) Sewage and water systems shall comply with standard
plans and specifications of the city and shall connect to the
city' s water and sewer systems.
9144. SITE REGULATIONS. The Old Civic Center Specific
Plan is divided into two sites for purposes of development ,
as shown on Map 2 at the end of this article. Development of
each of the sites shall comply with the specific site regulations
set out herein as well as the foregoing general development
standards.
9145. SITE I REGULATIONS. PERMITTED USES. Residential
and/or commercial uses are permitted in the Site I area.
9145. 1. SITE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. BUILDING HEIGHT. No
residential structure shall exceed forty-five feet in height ex-
cept as provided in the general development standards of ' ...'-s
article.
9145. 2. SAME. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE. Total site coverage
shall not exceed 50 percent of any site.
9145. 3. SAME. INTERIOR SETBACK. The minimum interior set-
back shall be six (6) feet.
9145. 4. SAME. SETBACK FROM PUBLIC STREET. A.ii Buildings
and structures shall be set back from a public street in accord-
ance with the requirements shown on Map 2 , located at the end of
this article , and such setbacks shall be measured from the ulti-
mate rights-of-way. Screening and perimeter walls are excluded
from this requirement.
9145. 5. SAME. MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE. Each dwelling
unit shall have the following minimum floor area :
UNIT TYPE MINIMUM FLOOR AREA
Bachelor and single 400 square feet
One bedroom 450 square feet
Two bedroom 650 square feet
9145. 7. SAME. PARKING REQUIREMENTS. Parking facilities
shall be a part of the development proposal . Arrangement , drive
widths , parking area landscaping and screening shall conform to
the requirements contained in Article 979 of this code. On-site
parking spaces for apartment structures in Site I shall be based
4.
47
on a ratio of one (1) space per 3. 0 residential units.
9145. 8. SAME. OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING RE-
QUIREMENTS. (a) Excluding that portion of a setback area re-
quired for parking purposes , all setback areas fronting a public
street and all recreation, leisure and open space areas shall be
landscaped and permanently maintained in an attractive manner.
(b) Decorative landscape/architectural design elements
such as fountains, pools, benches , sculptures, planters , gardens ,
walkways and similar features may be provided and incorporated
as part of .the landscape plan.
9145. 9. SAME. COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION AREAS.
(a) Open space and recreation areas shall be provided to
serve the recreational and leisure activity needs of residents at
a ratio of three hundred ( 300) square feet per dwelling unit.
(b) Common open space and recreation areas may include
but need not be limited to game courts , game rooms , swimrr , ,
pools, gymnasiums, saunas , putting greens , garden roofs or
grounds, common terraces , and other similar facilities.
( c) At least one (1) main recreation area or facility shall
be provided , and conveniently located to afford maxim use to all
residents.
(d) Enclosed buildings used for recreational or leisure
facilities shall not constitute more than 50 percc... )f the re-
quired open space and recreational area.
9145. 10. SAME. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. Private balconies or
patios, to provide private open space for residents , shall be
located adjacent to each unit. The minimum area shall be:
( a) Studio: 55 square feet with a minimum dimension of
5. 5 feet.
(b) One bedroom: 60 square feet with a minimum dimension
of 5. 5 feet.
( c) Two bedrooms: 80 square feet with a minimum dimension
of 5. 5 feet.
9145. 11. SAME. LIMIT ON COMMERCIAL USES. No more than
5 percent of any total building area shall be devoted to a com-
mercial use. The following commercial uses are permitted:
(a) Delicatessen and convenience markets , coffee shops
and cafes.
5•
48
(b) Beauty/barber shops and pharmacies.
( c) Dry cleaners.
(d) Florists.
( e) Gift shops.
( f) Other commercial uses deemed appropriate by the
Planning Commission.
9146. . SITE II REGULATIONS. PERMITTED USES. The following
uses are permitted in the Site II area :
(a) Libraries.
(b) Senior citizen centers.
( c) Public outdoor recreation areas.
( 4) Uses attendant to the above.
9146. 2. SAME. PRE-EXISTING USES. Any pre-existing use
not inconsistent with the uses specified in the foregoing
section, shall be permitted to remain in Site II , and shall
be exempt from the regulations imposed under this specific plan.
9146. 3. SAME. PARKING REQUIREMENTS. Any new D ublic fa-
cility, such as a recreation center for senior citizz,.,s , shall
have one ( 1) off-street parking space for every two hundred ( 200)
square feet of building area. All off-street parking shall meet
the requirements of Article 979 of this code.
9146. 4. SAME. SETBACK FROM PUBLIC STREET. All buildings
and structures shall be set back from a public street in accord-
ance with the requirements shown on Map 2 , located at the end
of this article , and such setbacks shall be measured from the
ultimate rights-of-way.
9146. 5. SAME. INTERIOR SETBACK. The minimum interior
setback shall be six (6) feet.
9146. 6. SAME. BUILDING HEIGHT. No structure shall ex-
ceed thirty ( 30) feet.
9146.7. SAME. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE. Toal site coverage
shall not exceed 50 percent of any site.
9146. 8. SAME. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. ( a) At least
20 percent of any site shall be landscaped.
(b) A landscape plan shall be filed with the Director prior
6.
49
I
final inspection of the foundation of any new structure.
( c) No new structure shall be occupied or used until all
landscaping and irrigation systems have been installed , inspected
and approved.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days
after its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage
of this ordinance and cause same to be published within fifteen
days after adoption in the Huntington Beach Independent , a news-
paper of general circulation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st
day of January , 1980 .
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Ci y Clerk City Attoru.�y
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
C ty Administrator D rector of Deve opment
Services
Ifu'�'r^:�.. F'C.. ! Of iL. Ciiy o
Ra...;, cui,
Cc� l L, L. C LGcZ��r Yt
7
� �� 1 LC.tfl
50
I'll'
;3
$A
•
Milo�O
�o
LU
W W
�C W
N
X
to LL
W
MAP 2
W
SPECIFIC PLAN
.-
SETBACKS
N
NOTE: SETBACKS MEASURI D F'ROM
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE.
R
51
Ord. No. 2410
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) so:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-offi.cio Clerk of the
City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the 'foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 7th _ day ofJanuary
1980 , and was again read to said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 21St day of January , 1980 and
was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of
all the members of said City Council.
AYES: Councilmen:
Pattinson, Thomas, Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
NOES: Councilmen:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
52
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
AD HOC
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
August 24 , 1979
MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 2 :20 p.m. with the following
present:
Members Applicants
Ruth Bailey, Council Brian Norkaitis , Wm. Lyon Co.
Frank Higgins, Planning Comm. John Cotton, Kanmitzer, Cotton,
Vreeland
Jim Palin, Development Services Mike Casciola, Housing Concepts
Stephen Kohler, Development
Services
This meeting was scheduled for the review of the schematic drawings
for the Old Civic Center Project; John Cotton, architect .for the
project, summarized the concept of the project.
The following points were of concern to the Design Review Board mem-
bers:
1. Parking for housing project is not below grade, but bermed and
landscaped. This will qualify as "semi-subterranean" parking and
permit wood frame construction above. Lack of storm sewer in
area preempts depressed parking.
*DRB requests. additional elevation or rendering of project
depicting view of structure from Fifth Street and details of
berm and landscaping treatment. The DRB expressed concern regard-
ing turf-block parking at entrance to garage .
2. Some small changes to floor plans of handicapped apartment units
were required to meet CHFA standards . Ten percent of units will be
designated for handicapped persons and one-half of these will be
designed for physically disabled.
DRB questioned if two parking spaces would be sufficient for
planned handicapped population.
3. Screening wall of senior center and library was discussed.
*DRB requested additional design alternatives to wall treatment.
4 . Integration of right-of-way improvements at site with future
downtown theme was discussed.
*DRB endorsed extending any future theme for Main Street rigi•it-
of way treatment to the corner of Main and Sixth Streets .
53
k
Minutes, -Ad Hoc DRB
August 24, 1979
Page 2
CONCLUSION:
The Design Review Board endorsed the structural and architectural
aspects of the housing and public facility components of the project
with the above-referenced concerns expressed. The Board also
concluded that the architect' s submission to the California Housing
Finance Agency conformed to the original proposal submitted to the
City.
Lastly, the DRB requested that the project be reviewed again when
CHFA review was complete and when a detailed plan for exterior building
colors and textures and landscaping was complete.
l
Step hler
Chairman P Tem
54
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING AND RECREATION FACILITIES
OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE
COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT APPLICATION
SUBMITTED TO:
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION
666 E, OCEAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 3107
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801
JUNE, 1980
I
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING AND RECREATION FACILITIES
OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE
COASTAL COMMISSION PERMIT APPLICATION
SUBMITTED TO-,
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION
666 E� OCEAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 3107
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801
.TUNE® 1980
CITY OF HUNT'INGTON BEACH
SENIOR HOUSING AND RECREATION FACILITIES
OLD CIVIC CENTER
Coastal Commission Permit Application
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART A Page
Section I Type of Permit 1
Section II Applicant 1
Section III Project Description 2
Attachment No. 1 (Question 1 & 5) 7
Attachment No. 2 (Questions 7-10) 9
Attachment No. 3 (Question 19) 10
Section IV Attachments 4
1. Title Report and Deed 14
2. Assessor's Parcel Map 21
3. Notification Materials Under separate
cover
Legal Owner Notification List 22
Occupant Notification List 24
Address Map 26
4. Approval in Concept Form 27
Conditional Use Permit 30
5. N/A
6A Location Map 32
Land Use of Surrounding Parcels Map 33
6B Assessor's Parcel Map 34
6C Project Plans, Site Surrey and Utility Under separate
Extensions cover
7. Environmental Fact Report No. 79-1 18 copies under
separate cover
Section V . Consistency with California Coastal Act 6
Attachment No. 4 (Question 1) 35
Section VI Certification 6
Section VII Authorization of Agent 6
PART B
Question 17 Attachments
17B, Attachment No. 5; Zone Change Approval 40
17F, Attachment No. 6; Old Civic Center Specific Plan 79-1 44
17I, Attachment No. 7; Design Review Board Minutes 53
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION m
666 E. OCEAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 3107 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT
V O. BOX 1450
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801
PART A
i213) 590-5071 (714) 846-0648
The information requested in PART A must be submitted by all applicants :
SECTION I . TYPE OF PERMIT REQUESTED
1. STANDARD / X /•
2. ADMINISTRATIVE / /. Applicable if development is in one of the following cate-
gories: (a) Improvement to existing structure and costing less than $25,000; (b) Any
devel-opment costing less than $20,000; or (c) Repair or maintenance activities not
resulting in an addition, expansion or enlargement of the object being repaired or main-
tained and the method of repair or maintenance is included within the categories speci-
fied pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 30611(c).
3. WAIVER OF PERMIT REQUIREMENT / /. Applicable for improvements to existing single-
family dwellings included within Section 13250(b) of the regulations but the impact on
coastal resources or coastal access will be insignificant.
4. EMERGENCY / /. Applicable if development is required by an emergency and results
in a permanent structure costing more than $25,000.
5. NOTIFICATION OF EMERGENCY / /. Applicable for emergencies covered by Public
Resources Code Section 30611 and Section 13144 of the regulations.
SECTION II . APPLICANT
1. Name, address and telephone number of applicant:
City of Huntington Beach
2000 Main Street/ P . 0. Box 190 _
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Zip (Area Code/Telephone Number)
2. Name, address and telephone number of applicant's representative, if any:
Stephen V. Kohler, Senior Community Development Specialist
2000 Main Street/ P . 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5542
Zip (Area Code/Telephone Number)
3. Should the applicant's representative only, instead of the applicant, receive the
written materials relevant to this application? yes
TO BE FILLED IN BY COMMISSION:
_APPLICATION NUMBER:
STANDARD
ADMINISTRATIVE / / DATE RECEIVED:
WAIVED
EMERGENCY
EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION
FILING FEE$
PUBLIC HEARING DATE: DATE FILED:
\,Not less than 21 days nor more than
42 days after filing.) A-1
1
SECTION III . PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Describe the proposed development. Include in this description:
1. All incidential improvements such as utilities, roads, etc. , as well as demolition or
removal of existing structures.
See attachment #1
2. Description of project location (street address, city or county, nearest roads, etc.)
and assessor's parcel numbers.
Fifth and Sixth Streets, Main Street and Orange Avenue
AP Numbers: 24-130-1, 24-130-2
3. Has any previous application been made to the California Coastal Commission or its
predecessor relating to the same site? NO If so, give the previous applica-
tion number N/A
4. Present use of property. If residential state number of units, indicate if owner
occupied, and give monthly rental/lease rate for each unit.
Community Clinic, Storage building, abandoned Administration
Building, Fire Station converted to leased offices, Branch Librarv.
5. Nature of proposed development. If residential state number of units or unit mix
(number of 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, etc. units) . If multiple-family residential state
whether units will be apartments or condominiums. Indicate any existing as well as new
on-site structures and lot coverage.
See attachment #1
6. Describe present zoning and general plan designations of the property.
G. P. : "Mixed Use" Zoning: Old Civic Center Specific Plan
7. Project height: from existing grade (7-10 see attachment 42) ft.
from average finished grade ,(AFG) ft.
from centerline of frontage road (CFR) ft.
height of any structure above roofline
of highest habitable floor ft.
8. Total number of floors including subterranean floors, lofts, and mezzanines
9. Gross structural area including covered parking and accessory buildings (in sq. ft.)
gross structural area excluding parking and
accessory buildings (in sq. ft.)
1-0. Lot area (within property lines) acres or sq. ft.
Lot coverage by buildings sq. ft.
Total coverage by impervious surfaces sq. ft.
Total lot coverage including paving sq. ft.
Landscaped and unimproved area sq. ft.
A- 2
2
II - -
11. Number of parking spaces; number covered 44 , number open 60 ,
primary 104 size tandem -- size --
12. The setbacks required by the local agency for development on the property:
Front: 12 ' minimum Rear: 12 ' minimum Sideyard: 6 ' minimum
13. Explain any variance or special use permit issued for compliance with above requirements:
N/A
14. Estimated cost of the development (cost valuation of city/county or contractor) :
Housing: $5 , 800, 000 Senior Center $600 , 000
15. If any water wells are proposed as part of the development, will the water be used for
domestic or other use or for development or other parcels? If "other", please describe.
N/A
16. Specify all utility extensions needed to serve the proposed project, including water,
fire hydrants, gas, electric, sewer and telephone. State current location of existing
utility service lines, and indicate whether existing utility service lines and proposed
extensions are above or underground. Indicate how many new poles if any are required;
contact utility company for assistance. Give name of system if on a mutual water system.
So. P.L. : 8" VCP Sewer ext. 70 ' ; 4 x 8 water ext, 48 ' ; West P.L. 8"
water ext. 220' for Fire H drant; N. P.L. : 1" water ext. 1201 , 6"
ate.rb ext. 470 or Fare Hydrant; E. P.L. : wa �Ir e�x
17. Desuri e any water conservation or energy conservation measures inc ude in�the project.
Project to meet State energy conservation regulations; low-flow
showers and toilets.
18. Describe any alteration of vegetation proposed on the project site, including pruning
or removal of trees or shrubs. Are there any rare or endangered plants or animals
currently on the project site? Some lawn area to be removed; diseased
palms to be removed. No rare or endangered species present.
1_9. In accordance with Section 13053.5 •of the Commission's regulations, describe any feasi-
ble alternatives. or any feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially
lessen any significant adverse impact which the development may have on the environment.
For purposes of this section the term "significant adverse impact on the environment"
shall be defined as in the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines
adopted pursuant thereto.
See attachment #3
20. Describe the project's CEQA status, including date of EIR approval or Negative Declara-
tion status granted, if any.
EIR No. 79-1; Certified January 7 , 1980 (Copies attached)
A-3
3
i
SECTION I V. ATTACHMENTS
The following items must be submitted with this form as part of the application:
1. Pursuant to Section 13053.5(b) of the Commission's regulations, describe the applicant's
legal interest in all the property upon which work would be performed if the application
were approved, e.g. , ownership, leasehold, enforceable option authority to acquire the
specific property by eminent domain. This may be shown by submitting a copy of current
tax bill, grant deed, signed or certified escrow instructions (i.e. , signed by both
parties - buyer and seller) . Please note that in certain situations (most likely those
involving the possibility of public ownership of the property thereby placing'a cloud
on private title) the Executive Director may require a title report to demonstrate a
sufficient legal interest in the property.
2. An assessor's parcel map of the property (and assessor's maps of all properties within
100 feet of the property lines) .
3. Materials for notification of nearby property owners/occupants, including:
a. Notification for owners of record:
1. A separate list of all property owners of record within 100 feet from all
boundary edges of the applicant's property.
2. A sketch as per the attached sample which depicts the surrounding properties
within 100 feet as noted above (show correct dimensions. of each lot) , and
indicate thereon the name and address of each property owner. (Note: Streets
and other public right-of-ways are not to be included as part of the 100 feet.)
3. A list of names and addresses of all other parties known to the applicant to
have an interest in the proposed development.
4. One stamped, plain business-letter sized envelope addressed to each of the
above owners of record and other interested parties. Each address shall
include zip code. NO meter stamps will be accepted.
b. Notification for occupants:
1. A separate list of all known addresses including each apartment, suite, business
location, lease space, leasehold, etc. , within 100 feet from all boundary edges
of the applicant's property.
2. One stamped, plain business-letter sized envelope addressed to "Occupant" at
each of the above noted locations. Each address shall include zip code. NO
meter stamps will be accepted.
The applicant shall also place a legend on the front of each and every envelope includ-
ing the words -- "IMPORTANT. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE" . The Executive Director
has provided an appropriate stamp for the use of applicants in the Regional Commission
office. The legend shall be legible and of sufficient size to be reasonably noted by
the recipient of the envelope.
These lists shall be part of the public record maintained by the Regional Commission
for the application.
Names and addresses of property owners are available in County Assessors' offices and
some Recorders' offices. Applicants should make every effort to verify that the names
of present property owners are provided to the Regional Commission staff. Public copies
of assessors' tax rolls sometimes do not reflect recent sales. Inability of the staff
to notify present owners and occupants of your application and scheduled hearing may
result in delay of the hearing or in the voiding of any permit issued to you as a result
of that hearing.
See sample sketch depicting the surrounding properties on the next page.
P P
A-4
4
EXAMPLE 1 EXAMPLE 2
50' 25'25' 50' 50' 50' 50' 50'
Pacific Ocean
The shaded lots on 7 7 ;
50' S0' 50' S0' S0' 50' 0' '�
each example indi- c o 0
r` x
0 0 0
Cate those lots N o $,
that must be noti- "
fied due to the
street „
relative location
50, 50' 50, 50' m 50. 01 0, - 0
of the lots from 0 •-"a�. � 0
the applicant's
property (100' not street
including public street 50' 25125' 50' 50' 50' z '2 '
easements). Lots , 0' 50' !0' 50'
which are only o
v
partially within �� f o t � o 0
the 100' notifi- N
cation distance ;
N
have been shaded T� n� ,; 0 0
completely to J 0 '
indicate that
notification is Attached to the back is a form
required. to use for the notification list .
4. Local government verification of consistency with local requirements, such as an issued
building permit, a letter or Regional Commission "Approval in Concept" form (attached)
completed by an appropriate local government official (plans must also be stamped with
the "Approval in Concept") , and, for all land divisions or .condominium conversions, an
approved tentative tract map (including minutes of the Planning Commission meeting, with
conditions assigned, if any) . Any use permit or variance granted as part of this
approval as well as all conditions imposed on it must be included with the verification.
5. In addition to verification of local government approval, documentation of all other
permits, permissions or approvals applied for or granted by public agencies must be
attached to this application. All conditions imposed on these approvals must be included.
"Public agencies" include cities, counties, regional agencies, redevelopment agencies,
air pollution control district, State Regional Water Quality Control Boards, the State
Lands Commission and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Where septic systems are proposed
local health department or Regional Water Quality Control Board approval should be pro-
vided.
6. Maps and Plans:
A. Development location and vicinity maps. Maps should show precisely where the devel-
opment is proposed and present land and water uses in the project vicinity. U.S. Geo-
logical Survey 72 minute series quadrangle map, Thomas Brothers map, road map or area
maps prepared by local governments may provide a suitable base map.
B. Assessor's parcel map.
C. Project plans (2 sets) stamped Approval in Concept, for all work proposed, including:
1) A site plan of all proposed work, including structures to be removed or demolished
(on demolitions a photograph may be submitted to show elevations) , and parking
plan. Note on site plan all significant vegetation and any trees to be removed.
2) Floor plans for all proposed buildings and elevations of all proposed structures.
Floor plans of entire existing structures are required where additions are pro-
posed. Show all dimensions on floor and elevation plans.
3) Grading and drainage plans. Grading plan should show existing and proposed
contours, state amount of proposed excavation and fill and specify any neces-
sary borrow or deposition sites. Drainage plans should show drainage pattern
for all runoff from the site, location of swales, ditches and culverts, and
specify size of all drainage structures.
4) Plans for all necessary utility service line extensions and any proposed
energy conservation measures.
A-5
5
7. A single copy of any Negative Declaration, 18 copies of any Environmental Impact Report
or Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the project. Comments of all reviewing
agencies and responses to them should be included.
SECTION V. DEVELOPMENT' S CONSISTENCY WITH THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT OF 1976
1. The California Coastal Act of 1976 provides in Public Resources Code Section 30604(a)
that a coastal development permit shall be issued if the Regional Commission finds that
the proposed development is in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Act
and will not prejudice the ability of the local government to prepare a local coastal
program that is in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Act. Please
explain whether the proposed development is consistent with these requirements of law.
Use additional paper if necessary.
See attach Ent #4
2. Indicate whether the proposed development is coastal-dependent, and indicate any coastal-
dependent facilities to be replaced by the proposed development.
Proposal is not coastal--dependent and displaces no coastal-
dependent activities. _
3. Indicate whether the proposed development is within or in close proximity to an existing
developed area. Indicate whether the proposed development will be visually compatible
with the character of surrounding areas, and if in a special community or neighborhood,
explain how the development will protect unique local character.
Proposal is within existing urbanized area; is compatible with and
will enhance neighborhood character.
SECTION VI . CERTIFICATION
1.. I hereby certify that I or my authorized representative will complete and post the
"Notice of Intent" form furnished me by this Commission in a conspicuous place on the
development property upon receipt of said notice from the Regional Commission.
2. I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the information in this application
and all attached exhibits is full, complete, and correct, and I understand that any
misstatement or omission of the requested information or of any information subsequently
requested shall be grounds for denying the permit, for suspending or revoking a permit
issued on the basis of these or subsequent representations, or for the seeking of such
other and further relief as may seem proper to he Commission.
Signature of Applicant(s) or Agent
Floyd . Belsito , City Administrator
SECTION VI I . AUT HORI ZATI ON OF AGENT
I hereby authorize to act as my representative
and bind me in all matters concerning this application.
Signature of Applicant(s)
(The information requested in PART B THAT IS APPLICABLE to the proposed
development must be provided by the applicant .
A-6
6
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
61 {
Planning Comission
P.O. ®®a1 ISOCALIFORNIA 020,CS
Date : December 5 , 1979
NOTICE OF ACTION
Applicant : Dept. of Development Services
Subject: Old Civic Center - Specific Plan 79-1/EIR 79-1
Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Com-
mission on December 4 , 1979 and your request was:
WITHDRAWN
X APPROVED for recommendation to the City Council
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS (See attached)
DISAPPROVED
CONTINUED UNTIL
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action
taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed to
the City Council by you or an interested party. Said appeal must be
in writing and must set forth in detail the action and grounds by and
upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved.
Said appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of seventy-five ($75 . 00)
dollars and submitted to the City Clerk' s office within ten (10) days
of the date of the Commission ' s action.
In your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing
fee is
Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any
application becomes null end void one (1) year after final approval ,
unless actual construction has started.
Very tru l.y yo,
1 U
JaIlles W. j'a1; Il
/ Secretary
40
Page #4 - Council Minutes 1/7/80
Peggy Williams, representing the Women's Transitional Living Center, addressed
Council in regardto the center' s needs, explaining their functions and the
various programs offered. She informed Council that the W.T.L.C. had submitted
a Letter of Intent requesting $16,200 from the Sixth Year Housing and Community
Development block grant funding program. This money would be used toward the
purchase of a larger facility, she explained; even with a grant from HUD of
$300,000, the center would still need a further $300,000 for purchase of a
'! facility. Peggy Williams urged Council to consider the request for $16,200, being
I in her opinion, a fair percentage for the assistance rendered to Huntington Beach
residents. She answered various questions raised by Council .
Carol Rouillard, Executive Director of the Orange County Fair Housing Council re-
ferred to the City's first contract for Fair Housing Services under the 5th Year
Program, in the amount of $10,000. She urged Council to renew this contract for
the current year, explaining the benefits to the City of their basic services and
the problems experienced by citizens eligible for such funding.
Brenda Premo, resident and member of the Housing and Community Development Committee,
also Executive Director of the Dayle MacIntosh Center addressed Council particularly
regarding disabled persons within the community who would benefit from Housing and
Community Development funds. She commended the City on what had been done within
the past three years in terms of access for the disabled, and spoke of the special
needs of low-income disabled persons within the City. Ms. Pr mo urged Council to
adopt a policy of setting aside one-tenth of HCD and HUD funds and even funds from the
City's General Fund, for low income housing or apartments being built to be fully
accessible to persons with mobility or orthopedic disabilities.
There being no one further present to speak on the matter, and there being no
further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor.
Councilman Mandic suggested that the matter be continued to the January 21 , 1980
Council meeting. Considerable discussion was held by Council regarding various needs
which they felt had not been given due consideration. Councilman Pattinson suggested
{ that the matter should be considered by Council at their forthcoming retreat, to be
`) held on Saturday, January 19, 1980. It was mutually agreed that one hour would be
given to the study of the matter. The motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING - OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN #79-1 & EIR #79-1 - APPROVED - ORD
NO 2410 - INTRODUCTrON-APPROVE
Mayor MacAllister announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing
on Old Civic Center Specific Plan No. 79-1 Amendment to the zoning ordinance and
Environmental Impact Report No. 79-1 . Said Amendment would change the zoning from
PC-C (Public Facility-Civic) to Old Civic Center Specific Plan, which would permit
residential , commercial and public facilities on the 3.64 acre site generally
-bounded by Main Street, 5th Street, Orange Avenue, 6th Street, and generally known
as. the "Old Civic Center Site" .
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for publication and posting had
been met and that she had received no communications or written protests to the
matter.
Steve Kohler, Senior Housing and Community Development Specialist, with the aid of
a viewgraph referred to the Specific Plan. He introduced Pat Norkaitis of the
William Lyon Company, who referred to the project explaining that it was the same as
was presented to Council in April , 1979. 41
Page #5 -- Council Minutes - I/80
The Senior Housing and Community Development Specialist briefed Council on past
action on the matter.
j Mayor MacAllister declared the hearing open.
i
There being no one to speak on the matter, and there being no protests filed, either
' oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor.
The Clerk was directed to read Ordinance No. 2410 by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY ADDING
THERETO NEW ARTICLE 914 ENTITLED, "OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN. "
On motion by Bailey, second Yoder, Council approved said change of zone, certified
that EIR #79-1 complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act and approvei-the Old Civic Center Specific Plan No. 79-1 and approved introduc-
tion of Ordinance No. 2410 by unanimous vote.
CODE AMENDMENT #79-6 - APPROVED - ORD NO 2411 - STREET INTERSECTION VISIBILITY,
OLDTOWN T WNLOTS - INTRODUCTION APPROVED
Mayor MacAllister announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing
to consider Code Amendment No. 79-6, initiated by the Planning Commission. Code
Amendment No. 79-6 proposed a change in Division 9 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance
Code to clarify, modify and require the 25' by 25' corner cut-off in all districts.
This code requirement prohibits any structure between 42' and 7' in height within
a 25' triangular area at exterior property lines.
i
The City Clerk announced that all legal requirements for notification, publication
and posting had been met and that she had received no communications or written pro-
tests to the matter.
Mayor MacAllister declared the hearing open.
Layne Neugart, City, referred to the proposed code amendment and urged that some
flexibility be built into the ordinance, giving reasons for his opinion.
{ There being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no further
protests filed, either oral or, written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor.
a •
Discussion was held between Council and staff on the matter.
The Clerk was directed to read Ordinance No. 2411 by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY REPEALING
SECTIONS 9103.4.1 , 9163.4.1 , 9204.2, 9233.4.2, 9603.4.1 , 9604.2 AND 9775.3, AMEND-
ING SECTIONS 9156.4(c) AND 9356.4(c) , AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS 9103.4.1 , 91.56.4.1 ,
9163.4. 1 , 9204.2, 9233.4.2. 9356.4.1 . 9603.4 1 AND 9775.3 ALL PERTAINING To STRFFT
- INTERSECTION VISIBILITY IN THE OLDTOWN RI , R�, R3, R4 TOA LOT, RA DISTRICTS AND
GENERAL YARD PROVISIONS."
On motion by Mandic, second Finley, Council approved Code Amendment #79-6 and
introduction of Ordinance No. 2411 . The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
NOES: Pattinson
ABSENT: Thomas
42
CuunciI Minutes - 1/21/80
ORDINANCES ADOPTED
On motion by Bailey, second Pattinson, Council directed the Clerk to read Ordinance
Nos. 2410, 2411 and 2413 by title and adopted same by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Pattinson, Thomas, Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ORD NO 2410 - ADOPTED - "OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN"
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY ADDING THERETO NEW ARTICLE 914 ENTITLED, "OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN"
ORD NO 2411 - ADOPTED - STREET INTERSECTION VISIBILITY
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY REPEALING SECTIONS 9103.4.1 , 9163.4.1 , 9204.2, 9233.4.2, 9603.4.1 , 9604.2 AND
9775.3, AMENDING SECTIONS 9156.4(c) AND 9356.4(c) , AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS 9103.4.1 ,
9156.4.1 , 9163.4.1 , 9204.2, 9233.4.2, 9356.4.1 , 9603.4.1 AND 9775.3, ALL PERTAINING
TO STREET INTERSECTION VISIBILITY IN THE OLDTOWN R1 , R2, R3, R4 TOWNLOT, RA DISTRICTS
AND GENERAL YARD PROVISIONS."
ORD NO 2413 ADOPTED - ZONE CASE NO 75-10 - BEACH/RONALD
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE
CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF TO PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PROPERTY
LOCATED WEST OF BEACH BOULEVARD ON NORTH SIDE OF RONALD ROAD (ZONE CASE NO 75-10). "
ORD NO 2412 ADOPTED - REDUCTION IN STREET WIDTH - LAKE STREET
At the request of Councilman Mandic, Ordinance No. 2412 was removed from the agenda
for separate consideration.
The Clerk was directed to read Ordinance No. 2412 by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING
DISTRICT MAP DM 12 TO INCLUDE PRECISE PLAN NO. 79-4 TO REDUCE THE WIDTH OF LAKE
STREET BETWEEN INDIANAPOLIS AVENUE AND ORANGE AVENUE. "
On motion by Pattinson, second Mandic, Council approved introduction of Ordinance
No. 2414 by the following vote:
AYES: Pattinson, Thomas, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
NOES: Mandic
ABSENT: None
ORD NO 2414 - INTRODUCTION APPROVED - LAKE STREET ALIGNMENT
The Clerk was directed to read Ordinance No. 2414 by title - "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODL BY AMENDING
DISTRICT MAP 12 TO INCLUDE PRECISE PLAN NO 79-2 TO ALIGN LAKE STREET BETWEEN ORANGE
AND WALNUT AVENUES, AND ATLANTA AVENUE BET14EEN DELAWARE AND LAKE STREETS."
43
ATTACHMENT #6
ORDINANCE NO. 2410
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE
BY ADDING THERETO NEW ARTICLE 914 ENTITLED,
"OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN"
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach does
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code is hereby
amended by adding thereto new Article 914 entitled , "Old Civic
Center Specific Plan" to read as follows:
9140. DEFINITIONS. The following words and phrases , used
in this article , shall have the meaning specified below:
( a) Specific plan shall mean the Old Civic Center Specific
Plan as set forth in this article , and as depicted on Maps 1 and
2 contained in this article.
(b) Screening walls shall mean any nonload-bearing walls.
Where such walls are not part of a habitation, not more than 60
percent of such walls shall be constructed of an opaque material.
( c) Interior setback shall mean those setbacks required
between Site I and Site II as shown on Map 2 at the end of this
article.
9141. OLD CIVIC CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN ESTABLISHED. There
is hereby established an Old Civic Center Specific Plan, generally
located in that area bounded by Main Street on the north , Fifth
Street on the east , Orange Avenue on the south and Sixth Street
on the west , as shown on Map 1 , and more particularly described
as:
Block 405 , Parcel 2; Block 505 , Parcel 1;
city of Huntington Beach, as recorded in
Book 24 , page 13 , records of the Assessor ,
County of Orange , and that portion of
Pecan Avenue between Fifth and Sixth Streets.
to
JG:bc
9/11/79
44
MAP 1
V e
TOWNLOT SPECIFIO
� O W!A
�r 9A R3 R2 R2 R1 e ��
a
INL'41APO
R3
NAFI"DRD
11 yti
d '
�r
M M
4� U V B � GCNEvw
8
C� z
U U e
1
9
f•'
i U (n
oc'.4 U i Z D TRO1T
Pa a
/ a+ Pa 23 443 9Vf 4�i Y NI..J
d c� c 2°"4pj a"'S 4M u a 0 �
O i
O D BAL.TIMORE
9 aS'
10
CD 4�
O � C4 Ci ATLANTA--
i
9142. ADMINISTRATION OF PLAN® Proposed development in
Site I of this specific plan , as depicted on Map 2 at the end
of this article , shall be subject to approval of a conditional
use permit , pursuant to the requirements contained in Article 984
of this code®
9142® 1 MINOR MODIFICATION° Any minor modification to an
approved conditional use permit shall be submitted in writing to
the Director, describing the exact modification deemed necessary
and the reasons therefor® If the Director finds that the minor
modification applied for is such that a substantial alteration
will occur to the plot plan, relied upon by the city in approving
the application for a conditional use permit , he shall inform
the developer that a new application for a conditional use permit
20
45
is required , pursuant to the provisions contained in Article 984
of this code.
9143. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. All provisions for
development contained in this code shall be met with respect to
any proposed development in the specific plan except where a con-
flict exists , the following development standards shall take
precedence :
(a) Building height shall not exceed the limitations estab-
lished for each specific site , except that such limitations shall
not include the height of chimneys, flagpoles, scenery lofts ,
ornamental towers, spires , domes, cupolas , parapet walls not ex-
ceeding four (4) feet , rooftop mechanical equipment , solar-heating
apparatus, or other similar appurtenances.
(b) Pedestrian walkways shall be provided throughout the
specific plan area.
(c) Perimeter setback requirements for the specific site
shall apply to all structures over forty-two ( 42) inches in height
with the exception of screening and perimeter walls.
(d) Signs_ shall conform to the regulations contained in
Article 976 of this code.
( e) Parking requirements shall conform to the specific
regulations for Site I and Site II, which sites are shown on Map 2
at the end of this article.
( f) Landscaping , irrigation and screening plans shall be
provided by a licensed architect or a landscape architect which
shall be approved by the Director prior to issuance of any
building permit. Further, all landscaping , irrigation systems
and screening shall be installed before final inspection is
made. All landscaping shall be equivalent to or better than that
presently found in the specific site area.
(g) Perimeter setbacks shall be landscaped except driveway
entrances.
(h) Refuse collection areas. shall be enclosed or screened
by opaque ma eria s and designe so that such areas are not
readily visible from access streets or any adjacent property.
Refuse container areas shall not be located within the required
setback, and all such refuse collection areas shall be landscaped
to a width of at least three (3) feet except where accessways
are provided.
( i) On-site utility services shall be placed underground
except electrical lines in excess of 12K . All transformers
3.
46
and terminal equipment shall be screened from view from adjacent
streets and properties.
( j) Sewage and water systems shall comply with standard
plans and specifications of the city and shall connect to the
c ity' s water and sewer systems.
9144. SITE REGULATIONS. The Old Civic Center Specific
Plan is divided into two sites for purposes of development ,
as shown on Map 2 at the end of this article. Development of
each of the sites shall comply with the specific site regulations
set out herein as well as the foregoing general development
standards. '
9145. SITE I REGULATIONS. PERMITTED USES. Residential
and/or commercial uses are permitted in the Site I area.
9145. 1. SITE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. BUILDING HEIGHT. No
residential structure shall exceed forty-five feet in height ex-
cept as provided in the general development standards of this
article.
9145. 2. SAME. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE. Total site coverage
shall not exceed 50 percent of any site.
9145. 3. SAME. INTERIOR SETBACK. The minimum interior set-
back shall be six (6) feet.
9145. 4. SAME. SETBACK FROM PUBLIC STREET. All buildings
and structures shall be set back from a public street in accord-
ance with the requirements shown on Map 2 , located at the end of
this article , and such setbacks shall be measured from the ulti-
mate rights-of-way. Screening and perimeter walls are excluded
from this requirement.
g145. 5. SAME. MINIMUM DWELLING UNIT SIZE. Each dwelling
unit shall have the following minimum floor area:
UNIT TYPE MINIMUM FLOOR AREA
Bachelor and single 400 square feet
One bedroom 450 square feet
Two bedroom 650 square feet
9145. 7. SAME. PARKING REQUIREMENTS. Parking facilities
shall be a part of the development proposal. Arrangement , drive
widths , parking area landscaping and screening shall conform to
the requirements contained in Article 979 of this code. On-site
parking spaces for apartment structures in Site I shall be based
4.
47
on a ratio of one ( 1) space per 3. 0 residential units.
9145.8. SAME. OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING RE-
QUIREMENTS. (a) Excluding that portion of a setback area re-
quired for parking purposes , all setback areas fronting a public
street and all recreation, leisure and open space areas shall be
landscaped and permanently maintained in an attractive manner.
( b) Decorative landscape/architectural design elements
such as fountains , pools, benches , sculptures , planters , gardens ,
walkways and similar features may be provided and incorporated
as part of the landscape plan.
9145. 9. SAME. COMMON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION AREAS.
( a) Open space and recreation areas shall be provided to
serve the recreational and leisure activity needs of residents at
a ratio of three hundred ( 300) square feet per dwelling unit.
(b) Common open space and recreation areas may include
but need not be limited to game courts , game rooms, swimming
pools, gymnasiums, saunas, putting greens , garden roofs or
grounds, common terraces , and other similar facilities.
( c) At least one (1) main recreation area or facility shall
be provided , and conveniently located to afford maxim use to all
residents.
(d) Enclosed buildings used for recreational or leisure
facilities shall not constitute more than 50 percent of the re-
quired open space and recreational area.
9145. 10. SAME. PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. Private balconies or
patios, to provide private open space for residents , shall be
located adjacent to each unit. The minimum area shall be :
( a) Studio: 55 square feet with a minimum dimension of
5. 5 feet.
(b) One bedroom: 60 square feet with a minimum dimension
of 5. 5 feet.
( c) Two bedrooms: 80 square feet with a minimum dimension
of 5. 5 feet.
9145. 11. SAME. LIMIT ON COMMERCIAL USES. No more than
5 percent of any total building area shall be devoted to a com-
mercial use. The following commercial uses are permitted:
( a) Delicatessen and convenience markets , coffee shops
and cafes.
5.
48
(b) Beauty/barber shops and pharmacies.
(c) Dry cleaners.
(d) Florists.
(e) Gift shops.
( f) Other commercial uses deemed appropriate by the
Planning Commission.
9146. , SITE II REGULATIONS. PERMITTED USES. The following
uses are permitted in the Site II area:
(a) Libraries.
(b) Senior citizen centers.
(c) Public outdoor recreation areas.
( 4) Uses attendant to the above.
9146. 2. SAME. PRE-EXISTING USES. Any pre-existing use
not inconsistent with the uses specified in the foregoing
section, shall be permitted to remain in Site II , and shall
be exempt from the regulations imposed under this specific plan.
9146. 3. SAME. PARKING REQUIREMENTS. Any new public fa-
cility, such as a recreation center for senior citizens , shall
have one (1) off-street parking space for every two hundred ( 200)
square feet of building area. All off-street parking shall meet
the requirements of Article 979 of this code.
9146. 4. SAME. SETBACK FROM PUBLIC STREET. All buildings
and structures shall be set back from a public street in accord-
ance with the requirements shown on Map 2 , located at the end
of this article , and such setbacks shall be measured from the
ultimate rights-of-way.
9146. 5. SAME. INTERIOR SETBACK. The minimum interior
setback shall be six (6) feet.
9146. 6. SAME. BUILDING HEIGHT. No structure shall ex-
ceed thirty ( 30) feet.
9146.7. SAME. MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE. Toal site coverage
shall not exceed 50 percent of any site.
9146. 8. SAME. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. (a) At least
20 percent of any site shall be landscaped.
(b) A landscape plan shall be filed with the Director prior
6.
49
final inspection of the foundation of any new structure.
( c) No new structure shall be occupied or used until all
landscaping and irrigation systems have been installed , inspected
and approved.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days
after its adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage
of this ordinance and cause same to be published within fifteen
days after adoption in the Huntington Beach Independent , a news-
paper of general circulation®
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st
day of January , 1980
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
i a
C ty Administrators D rector of Development
Services
I,�rL�•� �•t. 4:Ci2t1'Ii)!in
Itun:,'r ni :; �t tht) City Of
f.;C2c!i at9 t>
rird„c:n..:F� ,t. _',Y
t,.. t..sc.•n .i
Etc t.;i ,het.. .t, L•, f{ :r t.uf;t,^n
to �;. t: j
c All City.
�e4. ��C ep -77 r-
�. G
7° _. laity clenk
50
�1S
ui
t �.
N
1
Ln
kilo
.0 ' N
W
uj
Lu
x �•
L
MAP 2
oPECIFIC KAN
otTBACKS
W
tB$
9
M
Oft NOTE: SETBA*CKS MEASURED FROM
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE.
51
Ord. No. 2410
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 7th day ofJanuary
1980 , and was again read to said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 21st day of January , 1980 , and
jwas passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of
all the members of said City Council,
AYES: Councilmen:
Pattinson, Thomas, Mandic, MacAllister, Bailey, Yoder, Finley
NOES: Councilmen:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
City Clerk and ex-offioio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
52
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
AD HOC
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
August 24, 1979
MINUTES
The meeting was called to order at 2 :20 p.m. with the following
present:
Members Applicants
Ruth Bailey, Council Brian Norkaitis, Wm. Lyon Co.
Frank Higgins, Planning Comm. John Cotton, Kanmitzer, Cotton,
Vreeland
Jim Palin, Development Services Mike Casciola, Housing Concepts
Stephen Kohler, Development
Services
This meeting was scheduled for the review of the schematic drawings
for the Old Civic Center Project; John Cotton, architect for the
project, summarized the concept of the project.
The following points were of concern to the Design Review Board mem-
, berso
1. Parking for housing project is not below grade, but bermed and
landscaped. This will qualify as "semi-subterranean" parking and
permit wood frame construction above. Lack of storm sewer in
area preempts depressed parking.
*DRB requests additional elevation or rendering of project
depicting view of structure from Fifth Street and details of
berm and landscaping treatment. The DRB expressed concern regard-
ing turf-block parking at entrance to garage .
2. Some small changes to floor plans of handicapped apartment units
were required to meet CHFA standards. Ten percent of units will be
designated for handicapped persons and one-half of these will be
designed for physically disabled.
DRB questioned if two parking spaces would be sufficient for
planned handicapped population.
3. Screening wall of senior center and library was discussed.
*DRB requested additional design alternatives to wall treatment.
4 . Integration of right-of-way improvements at site with future
downtown theme was discussed.
*DRB endorsed extending any future theme for Main Street right-
of way treatment to the corner of Main and Sixth Streets .
53
Minutes , Ad Hoc DRB
August 24, 1979
Page 2
CONCLUSION:
The Design Review Board endorsed the structural and architectural
aspects of the housing and public facility components of the project
with the above-referenced concerns expressed. The Board also
concluded that the architect' s submission to the California Housing
Finance Agency conformed to the original proposal submitted to the
City.
Lastly, the DRB requested that the project be reviewed again when
CHFA review was complete and when a detailed plan for exterior building
colors and textures and landscaping was complete.
Step e filer
Chairman P Tem
54
PART A ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT 1
Section III Project Description
1. All incidental improvements . . .
The Project requires:
- extension of water and sewer from surrounding streets to
property.
- extension of water for two new fire hydrants.
- extension of natural gas, electricity and telephone from
surrounding streets to property.
- all utilities to be underground.
- no extension of streets will be required.
Site clearance requires:
- removal of four municipal buildings: Community Clinic,
Memorial Hall (now used as warehouse) , Fire Station (now
used for offices) , and an abandoned administration building.
- Clinic and offices will be relocated to another. City-owned
building and relocation assistance will be provided to Clinic .
5. Nature of proposed development . . .
The project includes residential, commercial and public recrea-
tion facilities as follows:
- residential
- apartments for the elderly financed by the California Housing
Finance Agency and at least 49 percent of which will receive
Section 8 subsidies.
Studios 10
One Bedroom 138
Two Bedroom 8
Managers (Two Bedroom) 1
157
Apartment structure will also include community recreation
space in lounge, community meeting rooms, roof gardens, green-
house and outdoor areas.
Commercial:
Within residential structure will be 4, 000 square feet of
service commercial. Tentative uses to be cafe, convenience
market, pharmacy and beauty shop.
Site coverage for this building and its site is 43 percent.
Public Recreation:
Also to be provided on an adjacent portion of the site is a
new 10, 000 square foot senior citizens recreation center.
7
page 2
This facility will include meeting rooms, game room, community
assembly room, seniors feeding program, senior outreach offices,
and general center staff offices.
This is a one story building with 85 percent site coverage in-
cluding outdoor recreation areas.
The existing 9, 180 square foot Main Street Branch Library on
the site will remain; certain cosmetic improvements (paint,
landscaping) are planned to enhance the structure. The build-
ing is one story with a mezzanine and has a site coverage of
48 percent.
8
ATTACHMENT 2
Section III Project Description
HOUSING (proposed)
7. Project Height: from existing grade 40 ' 6" ft.
from average finished grade (AFG) 40 ' 6" ft.
from centerline of frontage road (CFR) 41 ' ft.
height of any structure above roofline
of highest habitable floor 12 ' ft.
8. Total number of floors including subterranean floors, lofts, and
mezzanines 4
9. Gross structural area including covered parking and accessory build-
ings (in sq. ft. ) 133,367 ; gross structural area excluding
parking and accessory buildings (in sq. ft. ) 119 , 967
10. Lot area (within property lines) 87 , 494 . 0 acres or sq. ft.
Lot coverage by buildings 37, 622 sq. ft.
Total coverage by impervious surfaces 11, 535 sq. ft.
Total lot coverage including paving 49 ,157 sq. ft.
Landscaped and unimproved area 38 ,337 sq. ft.
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER (proposed)
7. Project Height: from existing grade 21 ' 0" ft.
from average finished grade (AFG) 21 ' 0" ft.
from centerline of frontage road (CFR) 21 ' 6" ft.
height of any structure above roofline
of highest habitable floor 6 ' (skylight) ft.
8. Total number of floors including subterranean floors, lofts, and
mezzanines l
9. Gross structural area including covered parking and accessory build-
ings (in sq. ft. ) _ 10, 589 ; gross structural area excluding
parking and accessory buildings (in sq. ft. ) 10, 589
10. Lot area (within property lines) 39,842 _ sq. ft.
Lot coverage by buildings 10, 589 sq. ft.
Total coverage by impervious surfaces 33 ,861 sq. ft.
Total lot coverage including paving 33 ,861 sq, ft.
Landscaped and unimproved area 5, 981 sq. ft.
BRANCH LIBRARY (existing)
7 . Project Height: from existing grade 25 ' 0" ft.
from average finished grade (AFG) 25 ' 0" _ ft.
from centerline of frontage road (CFR) 25 ' 6" ft.
height of any structure above roofline
of highest habitable floor none ft.
8 . Total number of floors including subterranean floors, lofts, and
mezzanines 2
9. Gross structural area including covered parking and accessory build-
ings (.in sq. ft. ) 9,180 ; gross structural area excluding
parking and accessory buildings (in sq. ft. ) 9, 180
10. Lot area (within property lines) 25,900 sq. ft.
Lot coverage by buildings 8 , 280 sq. ft.
Total coverage by impervious surfaces 12, 295 sq. ft.
Total lot coverage including paving 12,295 sq. ft.
Landscaped and unimproved area 13, 605 sq. ft.
9
ATTACHMENT 3
Page A-3 , Question 19
The following discussion of alternatives to the proposed project
is quoted from "Final Environmental Impact Report EIR 79-1;
Senior Citizens Housing and Activity Center, Huntington Beach,
California, " October 1979; Pacific Environmental Services, Inc . ;
pp. XVIII - 1 and 2.
XVIII. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT
In this section,. alternatives to the proposed project are evalu-
ated and the significant tradeoffs among the uses of available
alternative resources are presented. Major alternatives to the
proposed project include: . (1) no project; (2) alternative siting;
(3) alternate density; and (4) open space.
A. No Project
The proposed project site has a General Plan designation of Mixed
Development. It is underutilized since the old Memorial Building
and Fire Station have not been fully utilized for the past few
years. The Community Clinic, consisting of a portable building
and two trailers, are temporary structures currently using the
site. This alternative would effectively preclude the introduc-
tion of impacts anticipated if the propsed project were implemented.
These impacts include increased air pollution, increased traffic ,
increased on-street parking, increased noise levels, increased
surface water runoff, and a loss of open space.
The negative impacts associated with no project include a loss
of low to moderate cost housing for senior citizens .
B. Alternate Siting
This alternative evaluated the placement of the proposed project
at another site within the City of Huntington Beach.
The location and characteristic of the proposed project site
make it particularly suited to the proposed project' s concepts.
The development of the Activity Center in a centrally located area
of the City and adjacent to the Public Library will create a com-
munity oriented service. The additional provision of low to
moderate income housing at this site will intensity the viability
of the other proposed uses (i.e. , Activity Center and limited com-
mercial) . In addition to the convenient location of the site as
it relates to centrality, the site is attractive because of its
close proximity to the beach.
Other sites with similar amenities could be sought out, but due
to the current underutilization of the proposed site and its
ability to accommodate the proposed project, such a search could
result in few additional benefits.
10
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 2
C. alternate Density
This alternative would propose the development of the same proj-
ect with a reduced number of dwelling units. This would effec-
tively reduce the expected impacts on air quality, traffic and
circulation, and noise. A significant reduction in the number
of dwelling units would be necessary in order to alleviate the
inadequate number of parking spaces. Again, however, the benefits
of providing low-to-moderate income housing to as many senior
citizens as possible would be lost. This is particularly true
since a demand for such housing has been identified.
D. Open Space
The last major alternative would be the development of a park.
Such a proposal would require a change in the zoning of the site.
There would also be monetary costs to the City with this alterna-
tive. Such costs would include development of the property (i.e. ,
removal of the old Memorial Mall and Fire Station) , and the pro-
vision of personnel to maintain the park. As a park, no revenues
could be obtained from the site.
The beneficial impact of preservation and enhancement of open
space that would otherwise be lost an indefinite period of time,
if the proposed project is implemented, would be offset by the
loss of senior citizen housing and a new senior Activity Center.
In addition, the following feasible mitigation measures from
EIR 79-1 are to be included in the project:
DURING CONSTRUCTION
During the construction phase of the project there should be ade-
quate sprinkling of water in order to reduce the fugitive dust
emissions (p. VIII - 7) .
Construction and demolition activities should be limited to be-
tween the hours of 7 a.m. and 8 p.m. , Monday through Saturday.
The landscaping proposed should serve as a mitigating measure
for the expected increase in noise levels on the site (p. XI - 6) .
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
Building structures should be designed according to the state
energy conservation standards for new residential and new non-
residential buildings (p. XII - 3) .
11
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 3
Designing all structures to maximize energy conservation should
mitigate the impact of using a nonrenewable resource. By increas-
ing structural mass and using highly insulative construction
materials, a more efficient energy use should be realized (p. XII
- 5) .
Utilization of automatic landscape watering systems during early
morning hours or during evening hours would reduce the amount of
water normally lost through evaporation. Utilization of native
and/or drought-tolerant plants would also reduce overall water
requirements. Other water conservation measures would include
low-volume water closets, and selection of plumbing fixtures which
would reduce water (p. XII - 8) .
Whenever possible, water-saving plumbing fixtures should be used
to reduce the anticipated sewage flow (p. XII - 9) .
FIRE PREVENTION
In order to mitigate the increase in fire flow, a sprinkler
system and stand pipe system should be installed in the apartment
structure as required by City fire codes. This would also apply
to the rooms of the recreation center and the library.
Other safety measures would include the placement of smoke detec-
tors in each apartment. Also, an emergency call station should
be included in the apartment complex. Such a station would
allow each apartment dweller to push a button that would alert
the main desk. It would also be possible to tie the smoke
detectors into this unit, to notify the desk when one is activated.
Overall, a good maintenance program for the proposed development
should be implemented, in order to avoid deteriorated conditions
that would be conducive to fire outbreaks. The residents should
also be educated as to an emergency evacuation plan and general
fire prevention programs (pp. XII -- 14 and 15) .
TRANSIT
The Specific Plan should determine the transit facilities to be
provided by the proposed project. The existing bus stop along
Orange Avenue near Fifth Street should include a canopy shelter
for the convenience and comfort of the persons utilizing the
transit facilities (p. IX - 11) .
PARKING
The proposed project will be reviewed by the Coastal Commission
to assess its conformance with the policies of the Coastal Act.
12
ATTACHMENT 3
Page 4
An evaluation of the parking needs of the elderly housing portion
of the project should be made. The population characteristics
indicate that a variance in the Coastal requirement to reflect
the parking requirement of the Specific Plan could be accommodated
(p. XIv - 4) .
SECURITY
The mitigation measures have been supplied to the project propo-
nents to aid in developing a private security system.
The main thrust for security considerations should be centered
around keeping non-authorized transients from entering into the
complex and wandering around at will.
Further, proper lighting around the perimeter of the complex and
within open courtyard areas would provide officers with a high
visibility of unauthorized intruders during nighttime hours (p.
XII - 13) .
OUTDOOR LIGHTING
Any lighting should be shielded away from the nearby residents
(p. XXII
13
-_`✓' . 1`0 sae CA 90.0 110.7e1 I
NJ
TITLE INSURANCE
AND TRUST
Orange County Office ri 1
800 North Main Street Santa Ana. California 92702 714 547-3333
1
IMPORTANT
When replying refer to
• Our No. 610 410
THE WILLIAM LYON COMPANY
366 SAN MIGUEL DRIVE, SUITE 201
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF, 9266o Your No. HUNTINGTON BEACH
ATTN: BRIAN NORKORTIS CIVIC CENTER SITE
--� In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, Title Insurance and Trust
Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Calif-
ornia Land Title Association Standard Coverage form Policy of Title Insurance describing the land and the
estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of
any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage
pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said policy form.
This report land any supplements or amendments thereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitatinq
the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability
be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.
Dated as of APRI L 30 19 79 , at 7:30 a.m.
FRANK D. LUER Title Officer
The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is a fee.
Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH BEACH,, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION.
14 At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions contained
it, ; -nliCv b—o %vould h. as follows
1. ANY TAKES, BONDS OR ASSESSMENTS WILL BE REPORTED LATER.
2 . AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE PURPOSES
STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, SHOWN OR DEDICATED BY THE MAP
OF
SUBDIVISION : BLOCK NO. 505, MAIN STREET SECTION.
FOR ALLEY PURPOSES.
AFFECTS . THAT PORTION SHOWN ON SAID MAP.
3. AN EASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID LAND AND FOR THE:
PURPOSES STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, UPON THE TERMS,
COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS THEREIN CONTAINED, AS SET FORTH IN AN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 3, 7.923, IN BOOK 500 OF DEEDS AS PAGE
278.
IN FAVOR OF: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH.
FOR STREET PURPOSES.
AFFECTS THE EASTERLY 10 FEET.
DESCRIPTION :
ALL OF BLOCKS 405 AND 505 OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, MAIN STREET SECTION, IN
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
15
Hl%NT/�V6T�N OZ40
N/F!/N STEZET SEC.
BLOCK 40.5-
P46CAAI (AS4641OL/4) AYE.
141 ti
W W
60
s ,o�
5
�D h
0,2ANGE o c P.'1 E.
i
1&11V11-1V&17-01V b:6-
i�.-WAI STlffZT SZCTIOW
9zoCc 505
yj
5
q r o o-aam a-oo
a v.�a�mm 17
Ir<�
THIS INDENME, mace the 28th 6 ; of Jauna ry,, 1!1"1 ,
bell-on HUNTINGTON BEACH COKPANl', as cor;:prat ion, .?:arty of* t:l:o
C1r,t. ,cart, and The OITY OF HUNTINGT0N BEAOH, a nunicinal cor-ora-
i t i mr of tha County of OranL c, State of Colif ornia, Party of the
i, Second part, WITNESSETHi
Tlrat said party of the first part, for end in connIderation
{ of the sum of Ten Dollare (t10.00), together with other Good.and
valuable considerations, not heroin exprc�-.s;ed, the receipt of all
of which is hereby aeknoWlodgod, has reprised, relPase,t acid forever
qui Lela+imetit.. end by the�,o presents Ana's remise, relea-se and forever i
quitclaim unto the said party of the vecni;d port, and tr' 1 Ls
miceessors and asttiGoa gcoal.those certain blocks, nieces or
u1' lark( si Lunto, lyipj6 and be.irA, :in the City cif lIurrt.11%ton
d
ro.1c.1i, County of Orange',' State of Caillfornin , and bound-r'. nrlal.
a
y ;'a'r' ic�.l;•rly desc.rilred nsc follows, to-wit:
All of blocks Four Kuiu;real Five (4n�) and Five MkittLr•ed i'i.ve
(50:5), as l,er trap of Ma1n Street �?or.tinr, oi' the City nf' V,
11mrtAi%,ton Y'eath;.i ns reciorded In Pnnk '1 ;Inge 4.9, i+iscel.lnneous
11s, Recortle. of said Orange County, State of
Toget:rer With all and si.nL;ular the ten,•r,ients, tr' r•ue?it,rdr"ciit.r:
' npinu•t(`1+nnc<•s therouuto bulon611i1; n• in arr;,rvi�e n1111rrt,ai.l;i ;1„
:cot: the rr version and reversions, remniruler ;iw! rcirai l'Cor,, voot`l,
� 4
aq nlen aiid profits thereof, and also all Lite rif;lie, title :Ind iri-
s
i, ra:.;t, property possession, claim and Want::oovev, rr5 well
! in law as in equity, of the said party of the L:Lr<;t part, of, in
1 or to Litt, %ald prerniseii and every part and pearcr�l thr-rpof', ry Lto tUa' S.
appurtelrarrces,
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, all anti sirL;ular, Lire Sfli i nr,r'i ges,
In„oti it,r v.,ith the appurtenances, uiitn the �:n.i.r, party oc the :ccond
1+art,, :nirl .it!> flnecessors and anslpns forever. 1
V
IN WITNESS WIMEOF, the said party oi' Lite first -Pet ),as
rr. C1111be„ these 1resents to be siGned aiid sea Led w I Lit it tiq
•,� (, 'v n• Mai i T ,.# '411 �i Mil�.l }x Al+�d•'�1. y 1 J d,
1 y ryry
�vi re�� � '4 vs.�•�,� i� tt/t.,�j ,�ldjf' r �� � 5 i Bf,�� �
i8
,n
• o
-1,11 its Prosident aw! Secibetary thereunto duly autTior-
nti Lhe day lricl year :'ir➢t al)ov,• written.
HUNTINLTON B': m 0 PAhY
► ' 1 ;' ;,� res c e t
IN
State of 6811temb
ss.
COUNTY OF...Lee---Ang*168r........
CN th$f •Za.s:t...... ..........day of.........tla,n-ixaxy-,.........A. D., 19..Z� before me,
.........Jgaa...q,-.- Bh-H,..............................a Notary Public in and for the said
County and State, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally ap-
peared.......... Cst�•t BB ..........................known to tile to be the.
--.,President and...J...Vari....Sohg3.8Ck........known to me to be the
...Aza-t...........Secretary of the H U N T I N G T O N BEACH COMPANY,
the Corporation that executed the within Instrument, known to me to be the per-
sons who executed the within Instrument, on behalf of the Corporation therein
named; and acknowledged to me that su:-h Corporation executed the saine.
Itr WftUCIS Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal
the day and year in this cer to above ten.
sue.- ................ .. .... ......
ota Public in and for said my and State
.j�
19
a
•� `Y 4
,'ri p,;. � .is"�n•'�i!�. � � , 'mott ;,• +
• C1 t i :, * �� dT','�g;rggr riV�y a1; ����y �, S t t'� csr}§•. 9
� �' � `;6•, + �� '� '.'. ^:d+�' �jy'��?ro+i"'�a:l }'.'!ff� J�;a�,e t• �. 4' .�l"i it ,. +� �'
•.�. At '•»sd 5, yp�t Afy 1+i i �'•�� x r �. '�` r;ti ' f4i�`�N.,h� dd+. + rtt r '..i �. •�+,h.p ��1rr t_r .
i^, j ; iA rdk. [t [ XR .- a^i•+r`' �} {'. hb7 .t + ti'c�, S^,5.- t•a
'�;y' .'. r 'rs+yY, �v '4Y` »� +. ti•i �k �1,s��d��p�+'h.+ YFd'` s r -y d�4'L��JI v h J
f (i +.>,t �a�� � !•�yl, t4K � -xs. � � y4r� ♦ ,. �dt+�[t f. ..+ ![ a, �+.�tiL"'.1�k 4ni t i,
r:.t '7{5 i �� 1'� .,xY t., t'e.�� Y {:•. ,ey,�'�+d�! h r['k i�!f• Pt�iy,�,�r '�'2�5,��yi;i;Y :».
�/•Ur �,+� i,i 1 i ifS (r 1 ih��" t. r r i �+I Y�` 9 ` I t i fl}�^r �'r44}°da�ti t y '•'.'.7:. _
v,p447 ' �: �h1 ' t a?4tl i � tS i d I'd ,l i� � '�� i 1,In }�^xt 1 4t�i14a.1`rx epV�• •� t'•^
i GM{y:': ff`4'i f'{�"•5 1. � kt`+I, ,�� "5e�� i', �+{� s yF°'i" a �
�y I 'R ' '+•1' ^'• � d' .}:1 1V. :�,pi'i er e�.4 , +�d.
it ot
41
wJl
,�g �[,,�•i
t&.�'!�'t4t '.•
� t,�. i ` I•+ kii^.?r v.A y, „ t-{ i t^ r.riY1 $q+`�i�aty, e. j`�,
!+ hPy:• i •'t •••"� IrBi� r9 ', t4Sf {�h•�5' ®i,l :•�
I 'J � � I��t,�i�yd�?� �•i,,9 .r ,� �'t�l�y��t���e, r �`� �wr .{,• � .�' .. 6.+
• i �1et+. ', ye •'O�.,k•',�1 n�� .� .�"+�^ f d+ �� r•.,. •w, I
tdf '.; ,�dr �.st11 k5lfi} 5 y, C��1 MF Fy; P�t�t t>r: a�i�I}i+,>. .• . r. r '-, , '� 'd'
• r•J» .d",►'C7:.and aiir y�,y�a•�i�i(dJ}f•1 't4T�� Ji`fi�i+•�f,���'- :t�+p:`• ,,�yUb+ A.�'.'+w4' .';byA,tf.}:. . ,, e...4•.
rl� t
t
e
1
+
.f
t '
Coo
CZA
t
w,
it Y i 20
ti
�A!h
3 6 '
' i AGrA Avermut Z
5, \ civic
�, ,42
/ A
PECAN /rra ue nrso ' AVENUE '
- =�-- 5
— a cENrER r /
O r V
-t-l
'IQ sac na a:.a i
in
MI
i
Q9Uih*
1t21Fm2}�
�—Id.' ..•w oq....4o+..a<c+ - v>�•._...v.....«. .u< ( .no T1! '39,- • 11_:__ G 1
Legal Owner Notification List .
24-130-01 24-133-03
City of Huntington Beach CUP #80-11 Anthony C TTovatt, Jr ZR
April 22, 1980 (JH) Savoy 19515 Starfish Lane
Huntington Beaai3, Calif
7100 ft. radi.ous 92648
24-131-10 24-132-12 24=133-04
Tois K Brawn Roderick H Freeman et al Patrick C Love
17612 De Tang Circle 415 6th Street 418 Orange Avenue
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif
92649 92648 92648
24-131-12 .24-132-13 24-133-06
Oscar J Rosales _ - Chester E Critton +
7582 Appleby Drive 310 Huntington Street
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 92648
24-131-15 24-132-13 24-133-07
Lewie P Derigo William N Crawford 'Loran Kac
807 rain Street Helen R Crawford 420 5t1i Street
Huntington Beach, Calif 3367 Elope Street Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 Huntington Park, Calif 90255 92648
24-131-1624-132-14 241133-08
William C King .Perry A O Dell Elizabeth Collins
507 6th Street 409 1/2 6th Street 257 S Westlake Avenue
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Los Angeles, Calif
92648 02948 90057
24-131-17 24-132-15 24-133-09
V S Wilson Henry Stempniak et al Manfred Lengsfeld
501 6th Street 409 6th Street 3101 Yellowsatone Drive
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Costa Mesa, Calif
92648 92648 92626
24-132-09 24-132-19 24-133-10
Virginia R George Gonnunity Bible Church Mola Develoluent Sorp
423 6th Street of HUntington Beach 417 Main Street
Huntington Beach, Calif P.O. Box 69 Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92648
24-132-10 24-133-01 24-133-11
Rebecca G Easterly Manuel Torres Urban Reconstruction Corp
305 N Sweet Avenue 7593 Washington Avenue 22204 Hawthorne Blvd.
Fullezton, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif 'Torrance, Calif
92633 92647 90505
24-132-11 24-133-02 24-134-01
Irene C Whitfield Douglas J Merlin James Riley Fox
Irene C Lockett 412 5th Street 11783 Eton Drive
417 6th Street Huntington Beach, Calif Grand Terrace, Calif
Huntington Beach, Calif 92648 92648 92324
22
24-134-02 24-142-10
James W I�IcGuy CUP r 80-11 Joiu1 C Morrow
1700 Miramar Drive April 22, 1980 (JH) P.O. Box 2784
Newport Beach, Calif _100 ft racaius Seal Beach, Calif
92661 90740
24-134-103 24-095-08 24-143-01
Charles D Robison Zonal E Burry Sylvia Shandrick
402 17th Street Box 262 928 1/2 Main Street
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif Iuntington Beach, Calif
92648 92648 92648
24-134-104 24-095-09
Fmbert P Mandic _ - Robert R Allen
12689 Ian&;ila Lane .- 224 3rd Street
Garden Grove, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif
92641 92648
•24-172-08 24-095-10
So. Calif Edison Co. Victoria J Lane
19171 Magnolia Street 637 Frankfort Avenue
.Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif,
92646 92648
24-172-09 24-141-08
Gun Eun Donald D Gzaditzen
526 plain Street 321 13th Street :
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 • 92648
24-172-11 24-141-09
Hertha L Backlund Robert J Runk
8861 Stilwell Drive 6469 Dos Rios Rd
Huntington Beach, Calif Downey, Calff. 90240 "
92646
24-171-16 24-142-01
Elmer E Goetch Larry Bailey
610 I'lain Street 232 Crest Avenue
Huntington Beach, Calif Huntington Beach, Calif
92648 92648
24-171-17, 18, 1 24-142-02
General Telephone Co. Merle E Ca de
So. Area Market. Dept. 19381 Worchester Lane ,
P.O. .Box 600 Huntington Beach, Calif
Long Beach, Calif 90801 92646
24-095-07 24-142-09
Joseph E DeSues Jr John C Morrow
-609 Main Street 325 5th Street
Huntington Beach, Calif 1untington Beach, Calif
92648 92648
23
Occupant Notification List
e
i
Occupant Occupant Occupant
323 A 6th Street 327 6th Street 328 6th Street i
Iuntington Beach, CA " 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA, 92648.'
Occupant Occupant Occupant
401 6th Street 409 6th Street 411 6th Street '
Huntington Beach, CA 92643 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
1
Occupant _ — -- Occupant Occupant
415 6th Street 417 6th Street ' 421 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
423 6th Street 501 6th Street 507 6th Street
Huntington Beach, .CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ,
i
Occupant Occupant Occupant
509 6th Street 515 6th Street 519 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
523 6th Street 525 6th Street 603 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
I
i
Occupant Occupant Occupant
321 5th Street 325 5th Street 328 5th Street `
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
M
i
Occupant Occupant Occupant
tE
408 5th Street 410 5th Street 412 5th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
416 5th Street 411 Main Street 417 Blain Street �
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
1
24
Occupant Occupant Occupant
419 Main Street 420 Main Street 428 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
438 Main Street 440 Main Street 504 A Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant. -- _ _ Occupant Occupant
504- B Main Street 504 C Main Street 504 D Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
504 E Main Street 504 F Main Street 522 Main Street
Iiurntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648. Huntington Beach, CA . 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
526 A Main Street 538 Main Street 602 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Iuntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant Occupant
605 Main Street 607 Main Street 609 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
r
E
Occupant Occupant Occupant
617 Main Street 418 Orange Avenue 504 G Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Occupant Occupant
416 Orange Avenue 319 A 6th Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Huntington Beach, CA 92648
I
25
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION
666 E. OCEAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 3107
P.O. BOX 1450 APPROVAL IN CONCEPT
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801
(213) 590-5071 (714) 846 0648
APPROVAL IN CONCEPT BY THE CITY/C-941 T-Y OF Huntington Beach
as required for permit application to the California Coastal Commission,
South Coast Region pursuant to California Administrative Code, Section 13052.
COMPLETE Description of Proposed Development: 157 unit senior housing project
financed by California Housing Finance Agency; 10 , 000 sq. ft. senior citi-
zen Recreation Center, 4 , 000 sq. ft. service com' y, parking & landscaping
for above.
Property Address : Housing : 401 Fifth St. Senior Center: 501 Fifth St.
Legal Description: All of Blocks 405 & 505 of Hunt. Bch. , Main St. Section
City of H.B. ; Co. of Orange; St. of Calif; Book 3 , pg. 43 of misc . maps,
office of the Co. Recorder.
Zone : Old Civic Center Specific Plan
Applicant(s) : City of Huntington Beach
Applicant' s Mailing Address : P. O. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Applicant' s Telephone Number: (714) 536-5542
I have reviewed the plans for the foregoing development including:
1. The general site plan, including any roads and public access to the
shoreline,
2. The grading plan, if any,
3. The general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the
area covered in the application,
and find,
They comply with the current adopted Huntington Beach
City er G
General Plan, Zoning Ordinance , Subdivision Ordinance, and any
applicable specific or precise plans.
A copy of any variance, exception, conditional use permit , or other issued
permit is attached together with all conditions of approval and all approved
plans including approved tentative tract maps . On the basis of this finding,
these plans are approved in concept and said approval has been written upon
said plans , signed, and dated.
27
Should this City or County adopt an ordinance deleting, amending, or adding
to the Zoning Ordinance or other regulations in any manner that would affect
the use of the property or the design of a project location thereon, this
approval in concept shall become null and void as of the effective date of
this said ordinance.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 , and
State and local guidelines adopted thereunder, this development :
Has been. determined to be ministerial or categorically exempt.
Has received a final ExemFtion Declaration for final Negative
Declaration (copy attached) .
X Has received a final Environmental Impact Report (copy attached) .
This concept approval in no way excuses the applicant from complying with
all applicable policies , ordinances , codes , and regulations of this City
or County.
THE APPROVAL IN CONCEPT STAMP MUST BE AFFIXED ON ALL SUBMITTED PLANS,
THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE IN ADDITION TO THE APPROVAL IN CONCEPT FORM
THAT IS NOW REQUIRED.
I hereby certify that all information contained in this approval in
concept is correct and that all discretionary approvals legally required
of this City or County prior to issuance of a building permit have been
given and are final. The development is not subject to rejection in prin-
cipal by this City or County unless a substantial change in it is proposed.
Director of Development Services
By:
r�
Jaynes W. Palin
Director of Development Services
Printed Name and Title of Individual Signing
Date:
Attachments:
1. Conditional Use Permit
2 . Plans
3. Environmental Impact Report
4.
28
IJ
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA 92646
Date: may 7. 19_80
NOTICE OF ACTION
Applicant: The, William Lyon Company
subject: Conditional Use Permit No. 60-11
Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Com-
mission on May 6, 1980 and your request was:
WITHDRAWN
APPROVED
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X .(See attached)
DISAPPROVED
CONTINUED UNTIL
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the action
taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed to
the City Council by you or an interested party. Said appeal must be
in writing and must set forth in detail the action and grounds by and
upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved.
Said appeal must' be accompanied by a filing fee of seventy-five ($75. 00)
dollars and submitted to the City Clerk's office within ten (10) days
of the date of the Commission' s action.
in your case, the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing
fee is May 16, 1980
Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any
application becomes null Fnd void one (1) ynar after final approval ,
unless actual constructioiA has started.
Very trLI.1y YO
J4James W. Palin
/Acting secretary
29
Huntington Beach Planning Commission
• P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92649
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 80-11
Applicant: The William Lyon Company
19 Corporate Plaza
Newport Beach, California 92660
Request: To permit the construction of a 157
unit senior housing project and 4 , 000
square feet of commercial building .
Location: The subject property is located on
a parcel bounded by Main, 5th and 6th
Streets and Orange Avenue.
Date of Approval : May 6 , 1980
FINDINGS :
1 . The proposed 157 unit senior citizen housing complex complies with
all applicable provisionsof the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code
and specifically Article 914 , the Old Civic Center Specific Plan.
2 . The General Plan sets forth provisions for this type of land use as
well as setting fort?- objectives for implementation of this type of
housing.
3 . The Planning Commission has received the staff report and all pertin-
ent information submitted to them for their deliberation.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1 . The site plan received and dated March 25, 1980 shall be the approved
layout.
2 . The floor plans and elevations received and dated March 25, 1980
shall be the approved floor plans and elevations .
3 . The applicant shall comply with all of the conditions set forth in
the approved and signed participation agreement between the City of
Huntington Beach and the William Lyon Company .
4 . Fire protection system, including automatic sprinkler system, stand-
pipe system, fire hydrants , fire alarm system, and any other required
fire protection and detection devices or systems shall comply with
the specifications of the Huntington Beach Fire Code . Plans for such
systems and devices shall be submitted to the Fire Department and shall
be subject to approval by the Departments of Fire and Public Works .
5. Natural gas and 220V electrical shall be stubbed in at the location
of clothes dryers .
30
May 6 , 1980
Page 2
6 . Low-volume heads shall be used on all indoor showers .
7 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other
surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an offsite
facility equipped to handle them.
8 . The structures on the subject property, whether attached or detached,
shall be constructed in compliance with the state acoustical stand-
ards set forth for units that lie within the 60 CNEL contours of the
property . Evidence of compliance shall consist of submittal of an
acoustical analysis report prepared under the supervision of a person
experienced in the field of acoustical engineering; such report shall
be submitted with the application for building permits . All measures
recommended to mitigate noise to acceptable levels shall be incor-
porated into the design of the project.
9 . If lighting is included in the parking lot, energy efficient lamps
shall be used (e.g . , high-pressure sodium vapor, metal halide) . All
outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto ad-
jacent properties .
10 . A detailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils
engineer. This analysis shall include onsite soil sampling and
laboratory testing of materials to provide detailed recommendations
regarding grading, chemical and fill properties, foundations ,
retaining walls, streets, and utilities .
11 . A plan for silt control for all storm runoff from the property dur-
ing construction and during initial operation of the project shall
be submitted to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board
staff for its review prior to the issuance of grading permits .
12 . The applicant shall provide a solar-assisted hot water system for
the entire proposed residential project. If the applicant subse-
quently can provide information to the Director of Development
Services proving that the solar system is not economically feasible
at the time of construction, this condition may be waived and a gas-
fired central hot water system shall be installed .
13 . The developer shall provide individual cable television hook-ups to
each residential dwelling unit within the complex at the time of
construction.
I hereby certify that Conditional Use Permit No. 80-11 was approved by
the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach, California, on
May 6 , 1980 upon the foregoing conditions and citations .
Very truly yours,
James W. Pa in
Secretary
sdf
31
zE
�--- .._ -._ a
l I �
s
uNEll
v X
�� °IY 2' �' r� �.. �S I ItLNC� I�
l�' / a
.i. +. d� 1 i f.
s�ti 01 EST ST
GDEN R u E
'c
S, -Ell
■ :co
MA/Yy cer,tal n
NO tr S1 rn cq r.L,Np
s SIB t' s s
'INI
u _� „cnN ncs I
(( 1{t xowLq I �y151 ry asi .3 U SI
HUNT NGTON 51 t £ NUNING INN I-.I 1 iJ 5T J— 1111f111N 104 sl
1 � � >�Y
1 . DELAWA E T I-!
r .I 11. I'LLAIA14i 1 N1IH LN (D (.NNL.
�I ST
-
? BEACN�� Y{BIVD�� 1` "BFACH a�ooOLVDI
Ill MR
2 a
aI
11WIIN'. I.N i YV INti• IN T o n- N.I 1 I.I N x D f R c. C u v RUNT L
. 1. Irrall IN t Ir' I �it
1. t III {.,d.. L.�111N�
��� II I , fN ILu I I �I r I oA BF00.fM1 t 1
lI I 141 f SI�11 �;1
I., NFWI.ND S 5 y 1 'i'
T _
I
_�. �yN I'
.I°iry N♦r�nWY" r . .,i��Y..l. .1'SII�AHY L':LN n S•..i. - .uit:x Ml5114i. ... .�^'.ly �xn
O.,;I �sPhl Rit 7 °.1., :04.5 $ �� r ti 1
t
��I,a�rlj�Errt JJII to ,� I x.l� Es 2n�k 1I14
a , I_11 1�1 y J➢a� II YI'
MAGNOLIA 9ST o a.enti 111
zlGn � I 5u y ltl` I "
< uaCla� s' �' I
m
,noi l I S r,,str�I1U I
` INI
p p{
�RUSN�RD 4-1
uN rl. 16 J P� - :� B��Atl ll. �' sT r„ µ•nisi
"�'I' r 1 •1..tl I _ 1 trs 5 '(< �� 'T9
D
R
! =i'i' !— •, '' :.i: :;��: `Nf .1 BROOKHURST ST t. w•'r.v �(� l
l)` lJi A
dVW NOISVOOU X9
y\�
\\ \\►4\
•
A.�1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. ••1••1uri/
��Q111•�1111111•1
ttiithih YYYYYYY '!'H
�.1.111i1Qj1i1i1lQI �111.1.11��1�1�1.1�
��111�1A11_111�11�1��1
\
Y1v��w1y,lvlv���
111111111�1111111�
r1D.1D.1.d1.1.1
�.1.11.1.11111••
•v111�1v11����11i1/
11v1`1`1v1`�
1.•11.11.1
`Y1'1'1
►�1D1�1
1.1.111.1.i�i1�i1i� ��.��•����� ,
�It1tIt1t111�It111t1a i�i�i�i�i�i
�•1�! 1!• . i i i i�i'
YNI��l!Y111Y"1 ���.�.•.•.•.'
1�1��1�1�1�1�1•DD�1i ;�i�i��:�:��i
��'1�''1'1'1'1'1'Iy �i�i,'�i�ii.i'� •i�i�i��i'
i1�!•l1i1l1i1.1l1i�i ����•�•�•'•` i.i.i.i.i.''
�1`111v1111�111�1t/ '
1A.•.1A.• ••• ���ttii♦ it .
• 11.111.1.111.11111.1i
•th1t�1N �tttn •♦
�•1.111.1•'1.111.1; �
��rr11 t1t1t1t1t1t1t1ttlt'',
1�1�1�1�Q1�1�Q•�•�j 1i1i1i1i1i1�1i1�1�1�1
r r
4,
9 per'
FOR
s J
'ACACiA AVENUETo, it
yo
C/V/C
505 "r'I-T •
11
PECAN rMA6417./A AVE/ AVENUE*
ly
• h �F�
o CENYER �Av 5
to
g\14 IS •. --- -- . .
s
�+ toa '
ORANGE
aN I - 27
—
8 -~ - 26 5
— --- -- ~
Iff
as i seris'i er rr•i °I ,
17 • r 18 '19, 91
1
15
17 I 171 6111s 11_ r
16 s.. F9 , ar• F _
OLIVE
ATTACHMENT #4
SECTION V, QUESTION #1
The proposal is consistent with all goals and policies
as expressed in Chapter Three of the California Coastal
Act; and will contribute toward implementation of the
Public Access Policy (30213 . Development of Low Cost
Housing Facilities) .
The intention of this proposal is not to prejudice the
ability of the City in anyway to prepare a Local Coastal
Program and no evidence of such has been noted.
35
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EDMUND G. BROWN JR.,Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST REGIONAL COMMISSION `m
666 E. OCEAN BOULEVARD, SUITE 3107
P O. BOX 1450
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90801 PART B
!213) 590.5071 (714) 806 0648
The information requested in PART B that is applicable to the proposed development must be
provided by the applicant. In cases of dispute, the determination of the Executive Director
of the Regional Commission (or the Commission) shall be final as to the applicability of a
question to a particular development.
1. Where grading is proposed - Describe the proposed grading, including the amount of grad-
ing to be performed (in cu. yds.) , the amount of cut, amount of fill, amount of import
or export, location of borrow or disposal site, and the maximum height of fill or cut
slopes. Describe how grading will be conducted so as to minimize the alteration of
landforms and to minimize erosion during and after construction.
N/A
2. For development on a bluff face, bluff top or in an area of high geologic risk - A com-
prehensive, site-specific geology and soils report must be submitted, in accordance
with the Interpretive Guidelines adopted by the Commission on Geologic Stability of
Bluff-Top Development (copies of the guidelines are available at the Regional Commission
offices) . For development in the South Coast Region, this specifically includes, but is
not limited to, the following areas: Santa Monica Mountains, Pacific Palisades, Palos
Verdes Hills, Orange County Coastal Hills, and all development to be constructed within
50 feet of the ocean bluff edge of the property. For applications in Malibu, submit a
Geologic Review Sheet from Los Angeles County. For applications in Laguna Beach, South
Laguna and Laguna Niguel, a geology report must be submitted with each application.
3. Where diking, filling or dredging are proposed - Does the development involve diking,
filling or dredging of open coastal waters, wetlands, estuaries or lakes? What alterna-
tives are available? How will the adverse environmental effects of this be minimized?
N/A
4. Where septic systems are proposed - Evidence of percolation tests and soils/drainage
tests are required. N/A
5. Where applicable - Will the development extend onto or adjoin any beach, tidelands, sub-
merged lands or public trust lands? For projects on State-owned lands the applicant
may be required to submit a legal description of the parcel, tied to a monument or monu-
ments of record and a detailed plan or plat of existing and proposed structures showing
the location of the structure(s) with respect to property lines.
_/A
6. Where applicable - Will the development protect existing lower cost visitor and recrea-
tional facilities? Will it provide public recreational opportunities?
The proposed Senior Citizens Recreation Center will improve recrea-
tional opportunities for a (B-1 ) segment of the population.
36
7. Where applicable - Will the development protect or provide low and moderate income
housing opportunities? Will it displace low or moderate income housing? A copy of
local housing elements may be required.
The project will provide additional low and moderate income rental
housing within the Coastal 'Zone without displacing any existing housing.
8. Where demolition and/or removal of existing structures are proposed - What is the type
and age of any structure to be demolished? What is the destination of any structure to
be removed? Does any structure to be demolished or removed have any historical signifi-
cance? For demolitions, the following may be required: (a) an estimate of the costs of
repairing or rehabilitating those structures to be demolished; and (b) a report of the
feasibility or repair or rehabilitation by the State Department of Housing and Community
Development or of the feasibility of moving any structures to another site.
1) Memorial Hall: unreinforced masonry, 50+ yrs; 2) Fire Station: con-
crete & frame 50+ yrs; 3) Administration Building: wood frame & stucco
60+ rs; 4) Clinic : wood frame, 10 yrs. Buildings are of no historical
9. Where applicable- Will the development maintain, enhance, or conflict with public access
to the shoreline and along the coast? Is public access currently available near the
site? If so, indicate the type and location of the nearby access.
N/A
10. Where applicable - Will alternatives to private vehicle use be provided or facilitated?
How will the development affect traffic on coastal access roads? In certain cases traf-
fic counts or traffic studies may be required to provide this information. An analysis
of the availability of parking in the project area may be required.
OC'TD service available at site; seniors "Dial-a-ride" to be available
at new senior citizens. center.
11. Where the development will interfere with the line of sight to and along the ocean and
in scenic coastal areas from any public road, or public viewing point. - Indicate the
extent of interference. Describe any signs existing on or proposed for the subject pro-
perty; describe the design, size and location of each sign.
N/A
12. Where applicable - Is the development proposed within or adjoining land suitable for
agriculture? Will it convert agricultural land to another use? How is the project con-
sistent with continued local agricultural viability? Will the project adversely impact
agricultural production? What mitigation measures are proposed? The following may be
required: (a) an analysis of the soil types on the site; (b) an analysis of the extent
of prime agricultural soils on the site; and (c) an indication as to whether the land
has been in agricultural production within the last 5 years.
N/A
13. Does the site contain any historic or pre-historic (including fossil) resources? How
will the project mitigate any adverse impact on these resources?
N./A
M1
B-2
37
14. Where applicable - Is the development proposed near sensitive habitat areas, 100-year
flood plain, park or recreation areas? How will the project design prevent adverse
environmental impacts on these areas?
N/A
15. Where applicable - How will the development affect the biological productivity of
coastal waters?
N/A
16. In addition to the maps and plans required in PART A, Section IV, the following shall be
required where applicable:
A. For land divisions in the Central and South Coast Regions - To determine the average
size of the surrounding parcels, submit County Engineer house numbering maps of all
legally subdivided parcels lying all or in part within one-quarter mile perimeter of the
proposed land division. For each parcel indicate total acreage or portion thereof.
This may be expressed in square feet.
B. For properties in the South Coast Region fronting the water (except Redondo Beach,
Hermosa Beach, Manhattan Beach and El Porto) - Submit a dimensioned plot plan drawn to
scale (1/8"=l' or 1"=10') delineating the proposed development in relationship to adja-
cent developed parcels (plot all undeveloped parcels between the proposed and next
developed site) . On the seaward side of the projects (proposed and adjacent) detail the
following: pile and foundation locations, structural walls, decks, and roof extensions
(overhangs) . Dimensions which relate to the seaward extension of the projects (proposed
and adjacent) must be referenced to the landward property line.
17. In addition to the local government approvals required in PART A, Section IV, the follow-
ing local governmental approvals shall be required where applicable:
A. Planned residential development approval.
B. Zoning change approval. _
C. Approval of a general site plan including such matters as delineation of roads and
public easement(s) for shoreline access.
D. A final Environmental Impact Report (18) , or a Negative Declaration, as required
including:
1) the explicit consideration of any proposed grading;
2) explicit consideration of alternatives to the proposed development; and
3) all comments and supporting documentation submitted to the lead agency.
E. Approval of dredging and filling of any water areas.
F. Approval of general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the area
covered by the application, as permitted by the applicable local general plan, zoning
requirements, height, setback or other land use ordinances.
G. In geographic areas specified by the Executive Director of the Commission or Regional
Commission, evidence of a commitment by local government or other appropriate entity to
serve the proposed development at the time of completion of the development, with any
necessary municipal or utility services designated by the Executive Director of the
Regional Commission or Commission.
H. A local government coastal development permit issued pursuant to the requirements of
Chapter 7 of the Commission's regulations.
I. Private or public architectural review committee approval.
B• 3
38
J. In Palos Verdes and San Clemente for any application for more than one unit per
lot - Architectural Review Board approval.
K. In Malibu for applications seaward of Pacific Coast Highway and applications for
more than one unit per lot landward of Pacific Coast Highway - verification of the
County Health Department approval.
L. In Malibu - Evidence of Final Certificate of Compliance from the County (no condi-
tional or approval in concept certificates of compliance are acceptable) .
18. Where public works projects are proposed - What is the jurisdiction of the service area?
What is the method of financing for the proposed development? The applicant may be
required .to submit a copy of the financing plan, as well as an analysis. of the project's
impact on both taxes and assessed value of vacant property within the service area.
N/A
19. Where port and port-related projects are proposed, provide supporting documents in
answering the following questions. N/A
A. What increases in slip or barge traffic ate proposed?
B. Will the project result in a change in the capacity of the shoreside handling
facilities?
C. Does the project involve the handling of hazardous materials?
D. What contingency plans have been developed to deal with emergency events in the
project area?
E. Will the project result in an increase in truck or rail traffic?
F. What alternative sites have been evaluated for the proposed project?
G. Is the proposed use water-dependent?
H. What size vessels will utilize the proposed project and with what frequency?
I. Does the project require a permit or permits from an air quality management agency?
J. Will the project result in any process or non-process discharge to open waters?
K. Does the existing facility have a terminal operations plan?
L. What special training will operators of the facility receive?
M. What is the term of the existing or proposed lease?
N. Will the project result in the displacement or abandonment of any existing petroleum
related operation?
0. Will the project result in the displacement of any existing recreation activity,
including recreational boating?
P. Will the development impact on any habitat area?
Q. What pipeline or other transportation networks will the development be integrated
with?
R. Will the development involve the use of any open flame source or be sited near
operations utilizing open flame sources?
S. Will the development need any Federal authorizations?
E-4
39
PART B ATTACHMENTS
f J g ryy
D
D
D
D '
D
�1 BEACH TERRACE APARTMENTS
U 209-unit Apartments for Senior Citizens
NEW SENIOR CITIZENS RECREATION CENTER
DHUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA
0
D
D
' 0
D
National Housing Consultants, Inc. /
I
( 1
fli
Al
y � 1
r" ill
_3
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA NATIONAL HOUSING CONSULTANTS INC./DEVELOPER MATLIN & DVORETZKY ARCHITECTS A.I.A.
13400 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SUITE 203 SHERMAN OAKS CA. 9142
i
FP
J��•rl III�I � III
a II I ��I III
S8J7 ¢�
40PN.
VP
I
SITE CONSTRAINTS
21 VIEW BEST LOCATION FOR SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER ONE TOWER SURROUNDINGS ROUNDINGSND ONLYSONEISDDEGOFRTHE BUILDNNGCHAS G00D VIEW 3 TWO TOWERS LESS OPEN LAND,MORE IN SCALE WITH SURROUNDINGS, BOTH SIDES ^TWO TOWERS SN IFTED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE PRIVACY FOR OCCUPANTS OF EACH
3 EXI ST INC MAIN STREET LIBRARY EXTREME SUN EXPOSURE ON ONE SIDE OF BUILDING AND VERY LITTLE OF BUILDINGS HAVE VIEW AND C00➢ORIENTATION, 8llT DISTANCE f..F BUILDING, GOOD VIEW 6 ORIENTATION ACHIEVED, BUT STILL A
I SET BACK FROM PALM THEIR LINE=35' ON OPPOSITE SIDE, BAD ORIENTATION IN BETWEEN BUILDINGS IS T00 SMALL TO PROVIDE PRIVACY LOWER STRUCTURE IS MORE DEEIRABLE
5 DOUBLE LOADED CORRIDOR IN APARTMENT ARRANGEMENT
(FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT)
6 HEIGHT OF BUILDING(S) SHOULD BE IN SCALE WITH SURROUNDINGS
(�I
1_} /
P
OPP�
O
_� 00JOy
y�EO
P
�_J OPp 00
00
O6
OP
OB
0a
rJ TWO LOWER RISE BUILDINGS IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE RIGHT NUMBER Cl UNITS G�SINGLE BUILDING HIGHER THAN PREVIOUS ALTERNATIVE,MORE UTILIZATION OF 7 BOADED COORRIDORBREAK SINGLE ILDING INTO IN LOW RISE BUILDINGS A IS SUCH THEAT I OTTENSURE50PUSLE RIVACOOADEDY FOR COORRIDOCCUPANTSROFHBOTH BANLEINGSE ON A E
-� THE TWO BUILDINGS OVERLAP AND PRIVACY IS NOT ACHIEVED v THE SITE, G000 ORIENTATION AND VIEW, BUT OPEN LAND LESS
USABLE BECAUSE OF ITS EXPOSURE TO SURROUNDINGS BETTER UTILIZATION OF OPEN LAND BECAUSE OF ITS LOCATION BETWEEN THE
I BUILDINGS OPEN SPACE IS SUNNY SINCE HIGHER BUILDING IS LOCATED AWAY
-l) FROM THE SUN MOVEMENT GOOD VIEW A ORIENTATION, WITH NO EXTREME SUN
L
EXPOSURES
SITE STUDY
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA NATIONAL HOUSING CONSULTANTS INC./DEVELOPER NIATLIN & DVORETZKY ARCHITECTS A.I.A.
13400 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SUITE 203 SHERMAN OAKS CA. 91423
Q U
SIXTH ST.
� Il
(� i '- - - - -'-- --- -- - - - - -- ------'- / --- - - -------- ------------- ------
C -Trl
1.1
PAPK,�o /
i
i
® � i
` EPVICE YPRO /
i,
1 I j.i
S.C.C.PARKING i
I
-.- -------------------
FIFTH ST.
fGARAGE PLAN SCALE:-,:20.0`
I }
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA NATIONAL HOUSING CONSULTANTS INC./DEVELOPER MATLIN & DVORETZKY ARCHITECTS A.I.A.
13400 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SUITE 203 3NERYAN OAKS CA. 91423
/ W
_ Z Z
w
0 I1
t
SIXTH ST
,_ -
�fi,. ;:Y`-- - ..�7 - - 'r:'t' jJ "�,:- "ar-�•-*:k_ i t,_, r, _ i, »= r!.n J tY�-:��,•, � .�r.,� _ -
i '`�_q: - �. �°x•'�'. f, t'' �> c" 4� �'�^� `;�Jy,�..�5.��','i?.�.-5' .?�`i 1 V11 ,
. .
14
NAINT
id AIL
-T E
ll V PE F ♦E II�III M6E�TINE TV ROO.
TOF FIA�
rf
CRTS
An IE 5, OPPP
Yl.. ;! ,�� � ,� y� �1.t' �"h " �-•-- Ull PIEA
SERVICE TARO o�cr v i'
__-__ ---------
1SHUFFLE BOARD 4r----
J rt UNIT TYPE A �'�
!t BCC PARKING
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER (�
BEE PLAN ON SHEET NO7
44
z
'^''A •�t7fi'" �� '�u� s y>�, 1`,``+ FF/•l yY •i __ 1 yam.
t _i '1•'I'r . ' 777tF
1.J
J ( FIFTH ST
f FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE:T•20-0' /
NATIONAL HOUSING CONSULTANTSINC./DEVELOPER
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA
MATLIN & DVORETZKY ARCHITECTS A.I.A.
13400 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SUITE 203 SHERMAN OAKS CA. 9142
l_!
TV PICA APART ENT UN Pe A
J NIT A
1))-
{ y TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN SCALE,1=2a-a
RFS��K�x vlalpinz�EKE E)
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA NATIONAL HOUSING CONSULTANTS INC./DEVELOPER MATLIN & DVORETZKY ARCHITECTS A.I.A.
13400 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SUITE 203 SHERMAN OAKS CA. 91423
---- ------- ---- - -- --------------- ---
i
22 01 22 OD 22. OM
A
y
i
v
0
BR 0
IN 0
APARTMENT UNIT
° TYPE A
::
V® -- 77
':`;_: ®® 66C S.F. GROSS
594 S.F. NET
m
33'•Oil 33-0" 33 O'
.-- -- 1 BAL
LIV
7 0 Id
u a �Q
� N
Vhlh
BR" IN Q
'0
-00------ >3T0 oo-- APARTMENT UNIT
° TYPE B
"0
_ c 990 s.F GROSS
-_" BBO S.F. NET
0
J
m
TYPICAL UNIT LAN SCALE
NATIONAL HOUSING CONSULTANTS INC./DEVELOPER
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA MATLIN & DVORETZKY ARCHITECTS A.I.A.
13400 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SUITE 203 SHERMAN OAKS CA. 01423
I1
ry
}
LIBRARY
SERVICE
` ,Ly YARD
APARTMENT UNITS
'ItR4§
: _.
BEE SHEET 3 l ;
^, / .�" •1��G9�5 BTO
Ep
Y t t
KIT
- - • - _ '� I
VV Q M
_ MEETING Q
ASSEMBLY HALL
-
_ Ja "V�
LOBBY
�✓ — - --_ JTR
M V D
3 ' C
STORAGE
KIT
BID
t MOR OUTREACHEB
GA
_ ADMINISTRATION �y -
wl@@'
— -
ILBUS LOADING I
' SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER SCALE. FIFTH STREET
LE
G�G�QC�C
I NATIONAL HOUSING CONSULTANTS INC./DEVELOPER 7 :
u HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA MATLIN & DVORETZKY ARCHITECTS A.I.A.
13400 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SUITE 40i BHERM AN OAKS CA.91423
I .1
l _1
A
SIXTH ST. E LEV.
L_1
A ' �
�I
FIFTH & MAIN ST. E LEV.
I
i
luNmy—' Es SECTION AA
i
scnLe fzo-o'
8
HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA NATIONAL HOUSING CONSULTANTS INC./DEVELOPER MATLIN 8c DVORETZKY ARCHITECTS A.I.A.
13400 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SUITE 203 $MERMAN OAKS CA. 81423
t 1�
ll
-77
U
1tB—B ❑ � VENT WOCO ECN66N
G= G� � O O � O O ❑
O 1 ❑ O 0
may. 0 ❑
13
J SEC BB EICALE,0,'_ 0-
r� a
L
;I
U _
----
M6:CW6PEG WRN
U _________
I. .I �
- - -- -IT
0
U '
U
PLAN ISCALE 76—l'O'
U
U
LIBRARY
9
UHUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA NATIONAL HOUSING CONSULTANTS INC./DEVELOPER MATLIN & DVORETZKY ARCHITECTS A.I.A.
13400 RIVERSIDE DRIVE SUITE 203 SHERMAN OAKS CA. 0142S
�41e�enme fn
` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
OVERSIZED DOCUMENT
ON FILE WITH
CITY CLERK