Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHistoric Resources Survey Report - Thirtieth Street Architec REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date 'UNCI r Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council -� i4 Submitted by: Paul Cook, City Administrator 1 CT('Y CLFRK Prepared by: Mike Adams, Acting Director, Commu en r Subject: JOHNSON HEUMANN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES REPORT ON HISTORIC SURVEY REVISION Consistent with Council Policy? Yes [ J New Policy or Exception _', Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions, AttachnrMts:% , ►-. ='_ STATEMENT OF ISSUE• ?= T The City Council has approved a study by Johnson Heumann Research Associates to translate the 1986 rankings of Historic Structures . This report has been completed and is hereby submitted for Council review. RECOMMENDATION: r''' �� � � Receive and file above report and direct staff to prepare an G` enabling landmark ordinance to designate and preserve individual structures of historic merit in the City, including appropriate structures in the downtown area. Direct staff to investigate and develop specific implementation tools to address historic resources in areas where potential historic residential districts have been identified. ANALYSIS• At the City Council meeting of August 15, 1988, the Council approved the selection of Johnson Heumann Research Associates for the task of translating the categories used to rank the structures in the 1986 Historic Resources Survey to National Register categories . The translation study was necessary because the rankings used in the 1986 survey were not consistent with State and Federal terminology for categories used to identify historic structures . The intent of the translation study is to provide City decision-makers with standardized information on the City' s historic resources . The above translation study was completed by the Consultant and , .submitted to the City in December. Following submittal, • the report was circulated to the Historic Resources Board and the Historical Society for review and comment. Pic)5/Rs The study concludes that there are three potential historic districts in the surveyed area. These include the commercial Main Street Historic District, and the residential Ninth Street Historic District, and the Wesley Park Historic District . The Consultants also note that the individual residential districts could be viewed as portions of one larger residential area that encompasses much of the original residential area mapped at the turn of the century. This .area extends from approximately Eleventh Street to Sixth Street and from Pacific Coast Highway to Palm Avenue (see attached map) . Recommendations contained in the study include: 1 . 1986 survey data should be expanded and corrected. Also, existing written and photographic data related to historic resources needs to be organized. 2 . Remaining areas of the City should be surveyed to assess historic resources and to provide additional information on community historic resources . 3 . State Office of Historic Preservation should review and comment on study findings . Conclusions and recommendations of this study articulate with recommendations from the 1986 Historic Resources Survey and the Downtown Historic Implementation Plan approved by Council at the June 27, 1988, meeting . Issues raised included policy direction and implementation measures . Specifically, the elements of the Downtown Historic Implementation Plan included: 1 . Retain important historic structures with significant historic character. Candidates for retention include the Shank House, Standard Market, Arthur Young Building (VW repair) at 303 Third Street, and the Post Office. 2 . Proceed with rehabilitation of second block of Main Street, west side. 3 . Investigate recommendation for an historic square where historically important structures may be moved. 4 . Pursue recommendation of two historic residential districts to include the Wesley Park District and the Ninth Street Historic District. 5 . Continue with 45-day demolition postponement to allow historic structures to be documented. RCA - 2/6/89 -2- (1946d) Following review of the subject report and receipt of public comment, staff recommends the following: 1. Council receive and file the subject report . 2 . Council direct staff to prepare an enabling landmark ordinance to designate and preserve individual structures of historic merit in the City, including appropriate structures in the Downtown area. Landmark ordinances may designate particular structures for recognition as well as establish a procedure by which such properties are designated. 3 . Council direct staff to investigate and develop specific implementation tools to address historic resources in areas where potential historic residential districts have been identified. Investigation into local district designation and/or development of design guidelines are possible suggestions . FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Johnson Heumann Study 2 . Communication from the Historic Resources Board MA:REL: ss RCA - 2/6/89 -3- (1946d) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS I. Statement of Purpose The purpose of the project was to translate the rankings of the 558 historic resources identified by a survey conducted in 1986 into National Register of Historic Places eligibility categories. By the accomplishment of this task the City's historic survey will conform to statewide guidelines and practices, facilitating California Environ- mental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106) compliance and local planning efforts. II. Methodology Each of the 558 previously identified resources within the boun- daries of the original downtown survey area was viewed during the course of a windshield survey. The project area boundaries were Pacific Coast Highway, Golden West Street, Garfield Avenue, and Lake Street. Only those streets containing identified addresses were in- spected. Historic Resources Inventory forms (DPR 523s) and the Histo- ric Resources Survey Report were reviewed. Comments of City staff and the Historic Resources Board were solicited at a meeting on October 26, 1988. Additional reports and documentation were provided by Staff and the 'Board; no new research was performed by the consultants. On the basis of the visual and documentary evidence available to them, the consultants categorized the resources by National Register eligi- bility status. III. Results of the Project 588 properties were classified by the study; this number repre- sents the 558 addresses included in the 1988 report (Appendix C) plus approximately 30 addresses which consultants determined should be added to the windshield survey. The categories utilized were as follows: 1. Individually listed in the National Register of Historic Places. 1D. Listed in the National Register as part of a district. 2. Determined individually eligible to the Register by the U.S. Department of the Interior. 2D. Determined eligible only as part of a district. 3. Appears eligible for individual listing. 3D. Appears eligible for listing only as a contributor to a poten- tial National Register district. 3D/NC. Within the boundaries of a potential National Register dis- trict, but does not contribute to its historic or architectur- al significance due to age, alterations, or character. 4. May become eligible for listing when: a) more historic or architectural research is performed. b) the property- is restored to an earlier appearance. c) more significant examples of the property's architectural style are demolished. d) the property becomes old enough to meet the Register's 50- year requirement. 4D. May become eligible (as above) only as a contributor to a district. 5*. Is listed or is eligible for listing under a local preserva- tion or landmark ordinance. 5D#. Is listed or is eligible for listing as a contributor to a locally designated historic district or preservation area. 5. Worthy of note as a relatively intact example of a representa- tive style or type or as a contributor to a relatively intact cluster or grouping. 6. None of the above. 7. Other. See "Comments." d. Demolished. Where a two-part designation is assigned (e.g. 3/3D, 3/5D*), the first part indicates individual status and the second half notes its loca- tion within a potential district. In the absence of a local landmark and landmark district ordinance, the criteria contained in the publi- cation "Preparing a Historic Preservation Ordinance" (Richard J. Roddewig, American Planning Association) were applied. Copies of these criteria as well as the National Register criteria are included in the appendix. The results of the evaluations are as follows: Category Number of resources 1 2 2 R 2D 0 3 16 3D 40 3D/NC 13 4 3 4D 0 5* 20 5D* 84 5 233 6 107 7 14 d 56 Total 588 Two listings of the evaluations can.be found in the appendix, organ- ized by address and by eligibility category, respectively. The re- sults were also mapped as part of a separate submission to the City. It should be noted that, in addition to the 5* resources, building classified as 1, 3, and 4 could also be considered for local landmark designation. The existence of three potential historic districts was con- firmed. The Main Street Historic District was assigned a 3D evalua- tion based on-its apparent historic significance and present integri- ty. A memo discussing the Main Street Historic District was prepared for the City on November 2, 1988 and is included in the appendix. Two residential districts were identified and classified as 5D. The boundaries of. the Wesley Park Historic District were adjusted to reflect the intact portions of the original subdivision. Two blocks of. Ninth Street, between Olive and Pecan Avenues, were noted for their strong integrity and constitute a potential Ninth Street Historic District. The Ninth Street area could also be viewed as the core of a larger neighborhood, the "Main Street Section" of the original City of Huntington Reach as mapped on September 16, 1904. Extending approxi- mately from Eleventh Street to Sixth Street and from Pacific Coast Highway to Palm Avenue, this area is presently at a crossroads in its development. It is fairly evenly divided between buildings which contribute to the historic fabric and new construction. This alterna- tive has also been mapped. If the City decided to pursue such a designation all of the "5"s within these boundaries would become "5D*s. IV. Recommendations A. Additions and corrections to 1986 survey. In order to make the 1986 survey more accessible and useful, several suggestions are offered. Appendix C should be updated to include the new evaluations and the dates and descriptions contained in the DPRs which are more accurate. Further research should be undertaken as required to justify and amplify the significance state- ments with historical data. Sources could include the City building permit ledgers which apparently date from 1911 to 1935, the Orange County tax assessor's archives (located in Santa Ana) and periodicals such as the Southwest Ruilder and Contractor and local newspapers. The photographic negatives from 1986 need to be organized and keyed to Appendix C; a set of proof sheets may be helpful in this regard. Any addresses included in the 1988 listings which were not documented in 1986 on a DPR and have not been demolished should be researched. If evaluated as a 5 or better, or if the research indicates a higher evaluation is appropriate, a PPR should be prepared. A list of those addresses for which no PPR was available to the consultants is in- cluded in the appendix. R. Further survey. The remainder of the city should be studied to determine the existence of other potential architectural or historic resources. If a windshield survey and a review of historical evidence indicates that such resources exist, an inventory, including the preparation of. PPR forms, for the targeted areas should be undertaken. Completion of a city-wide study will provide a further context for evaluation, and may clarify the significance of a potential original city residential district. C. State verification of findings. As specified in the proposal and contract for this project, this study should be submitted to the State r)ffice of Historic Preservation for review and comment, and any changes incorporated into this report. Arrangements for this process are currently underway. TERMINOLOGY MSHD - Main Street Historic District NSHD - Ninth Street Historic District WPHD - Wesley Park Historic District TOC - Turn of the Century 1 s - First story 2 s - Second story d - Demolished Craftsman - Craftsman .architectural style (1952d) HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS Listed by Address Page no. 00001 HUN'LLNGTON BEACH HISTORIC RESOURCES buRVEY EVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 1 0112-16 02 Street D 6 2 0121 02 Street 5 Addition to survey 3 0127 02 Street C d 4 0208 02 Street D 5 5 0215 02 Street D 6 6 0222 02 Street D 6 7 0230 02 Street C 6 8 0309 02 Street C 6 .9 0310 02 Street D 6 10 0312 02 Street C- 6 11 0313 02 Street D 6 12 0316-18 02 Street D 6 13 0317 02 Street D 6 14 0321 02 Street C- 6 15 0115-17 03 Street C/2 5 On demolition list 16 0118 03 Street B d 17 0122 03 Street D d 18 0220 03 Street C- 5 19 0221 03 Street" B/2 3D MSHD 20 0303 03 Street A/3 5* /3D MSHD 5* if 1885 date verified 21 0310 03 Street B 5 22 0318 03 Street C- 5 23 0320 03 Street C 5 Page no. 00002 HUNT.iNGTON BEACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 24 0405 03 Street C 5 25 0407 03 Street C 5 26 0409 03 Street C 5 27 0121 05 Street B/1 3D MSHD 28 0122 05 Street B/2 3D MSHD 29 0204 05 Street A/3 3 /31) MSHD 30 0206 05 Street C/2 3D MSHD 31 0210 05 Street B/1' 3D /NC MSHD 32 0214 05 Street C+/2 3D MSHD 33 0215 05 Street D- 3D MSHD 34 0218-20 05 Street C-/3 4 /3D MSHD 35 0225 05 Street C-/l 6 36 0301 05 Street C-/l 5 37 0305 05 Street D 6 38 0311 05 Street B-/2 5 39 0313 05 Street C/0 5 40 0317 05 Street C/2 5* Good example of type 41 0321 05 Street C/2 5* Good example of type 42 0328 05 Street C/2 5 43 0412 05 Street C 7 d 44 0613 05 Street D 6 45 0119 06 Street 3D MSHD Addition to survey 1 s Craftsman 46 0125 06 Street D 3D MSHD ,Page no. 00003 HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 47 0128 (126) 06 Street A 1 /3D MSHD 48 0129 06 Street 3D MSHD Addition to survey 2 s Craftsman 49 0211 06 Street C 5 50 0215 06 Street C 6 51 0217 06 Street D 5 52 0220 06 Street D 5 53 0223 06 Street C+ 5 On demolition list 54 0308 06 Street C 5 Cluster 55 0310-12 06 Street C+ 5 Cluster 56 0313 06 Street C 5 Cluster 57 0317 06 Street C 5 Cluster 58 0323-27 06 Street C+ 5 Cluster 59 0328 06 Street C 5 Cluster 60 0401 06 Street A 4 Cluster 61 0409 06 Street C 5 Cluster 62 0411 06 Street C 5 Cluster 63 0415 06 Street C+ 5* On demolition list Cluster Good example 64 0421 06 Street C- d 65 0423 06 Street C d 66 0501 06 Street C 5 67 0509 06 Street C 5 68 0515 06 Street C 5 , Page no. 00004 HUNTINGTON REACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 69 0519 06 Street C 5 70 0603 06 Street R 5 71 0111-15 07 Street R- 5 72 0112 07 Street 5 (?) Addition to survey 73 0121 07 Street C 5 74 0123 07 Street C 5 75 0124 07 Street B- 5 76 0126 07 Street C 6 77 0127 07 Street C 5 78 0215 07 Street C 5 79 0311 07 Street C 5 80 0312 07 Street C 5 81 0316 07 Street C 5 82 0317 07 Street C+ 5 83 0320 07 Street C d 84 0322 07 Street C 5 85 0326 07 Street R- 5* Good example of type 86 0401-03 07 Street R 5* Good example of type 87 0402 07 Street C 5 88 0406 07 Street C 5 89 0410 07 Street C 5 90 0412 07 Street C 5 91 0416 07 Street D 5- 92 0422 07 Street D d Page no. 00005 HUNTINGTON REACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12/09/68 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 93 0423 07 Street D 6 94 0427 07 Street C 5 95 0428 07 Street R 5* Good example of type 96 0503 07 Street C+ 5* Good example of type 97 0504 07 Street D 6 98 0506 07 Street C 5 99 0508 07 Street C 5 100 0510 07 Street C 6 101 0514 07 Street C 5 102 0523 07 Street D 5 103 0526 07 Street D 6 104 0527 07 Street C 5 105 0601 07 Street C 5 106 0602 07 Street 5 (?) Addition to survey 107 0605 07 Street C 5 108 0607 07 Street n d 109 0609 07 Street C 5 110 0613 07 Street C 5 111 0616 07 Street 5 (?) Addition to survey 112 0617 07 Street C 5 113 0619 07 Street C 5 114 0623 07 Street 5 (?) Addition to survey 115 0627 07 Street C 6 116 0112 08 Street C d 'Page no. 00006 HUNTINGTON REACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 117 0115 08 Street C 5 Good example 118 0116 08 Street C d 119 0123 08 Street C+ 5* Good example of. type 120 0125 08 Street C 5 121 0206 08 Street C 5 122 0209 08 Street C d 123 0212 08 Street C 5 Good example 124 0214 08 Street D d 125 0215 08 Street C+ 5 Good example 126 0220 08 Street C 5 127 0227 08 Street C+ 5 Good example 128 0301 08 Street R 5* 129 0315 08 Street C 5 130 0317-19 08 Street D 6 131 0318 08 Street D 5 132 0322 08 Street C 5 133 0327 08 Street D 5 134 0404 08 Street C 5 135 0408 08 Street D 5 136 0409 08 Street C 5 137 0411 08 Street C 5 Looks like farmhouse 138 0412 08 Street D 5 139 0413 08 Street D d 140 0421 08 Street A 3 ,Page no. 00007 HUN'tiNGTON REACH HISTORIC RRSOURCFS ,,LJRVFY EVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Continents 141 0422-24 08 Street C 5- 142 0426 08 Street C+ 5 143 0501 08 Street C 5 144 0506 08 Street D d 145 0507 08 Street 5 Addition to survey 146 0510 08 Street C 5- 147 0514 08 Street C 5 Altered 148 0515 08 Street C 5 149 0518 08 Street C 5 150 0521 08 Street C 5 151 0527 08 Street C 5 152 0601 08 Street C+ 5 153 0605 08 Street C 5 154 0609 08 Street C d 155 0610 08 Street C 5 156 0613 08 Street C 5 157 0614 08 Street D 5 158 0618-20 08 Street R- 6 Very altered 159 0619 08 Street C 5 160 0621 08 Street C 5 161 0622 08 Street C 5 162 0627 08 Street C 5 163 0115 09 Street C 5 164 0201 09 Street R 5 Good example :Page no. 00008 HUNTINGTON REACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12/09/8R Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 165 0206 09 Street D 6 166 0207 09 Street D 5 167 0211 09 Street R 5 Very Victorianized TOC 168 0215 09 Street B 5 169 0216 09 Street D 6 170 0217 09 Street B 5 171 0219 09 Street C 5 172 022.1 09 Street C 5 173 0224 09 Street C 5 174 02.27 09 Street C 5 175 0310 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 176 0311 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 177 0314 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 178 0315-17 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 179 0318 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 180 032.0 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 181 0321 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 182 0323 09 Street" C 5D* NSHD 183 0324 09 Street D 5D* NSHD 184 0327 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 185 0404 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 186 0405 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 187 0406 09 Street C 5* /5D* NSHD 'Page no. 00009 HUNTINGTON REACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments A 188 0407 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 189 0410 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 190 0411 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 191 0412 09 Street C . 5D* NSHD 192 0414 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 193 0415 09 Street C+ 5D* NSHD 194 0416 09 Street D 5D* NSHD 195 0418-20 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 196 0419 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 197 0421-23 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 198 0422 09 Street C 5D* NSHD 199 0427 09 Street C 5D* N HD 200 0502 09 Street D 6 201 0505 09 Street C d 202 0506 09 Street C 5 2.03 0507 09 Street D d 204 0508 09 Street C 5 205 0509-1.1 09 Street. C d 2.06 0510 09 Street D d 207 052.4 09 Street C 5 2.08 0602 09 Street C 6 209 0610 09 Street C 5 210 0614 09 Street D 5 211 0616 09 Street C 5 'Page no. 00010 WNTINGTON RFACH HISTORIC RFSOTJRCFS SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NY Cat. Comments 212 0618 09 Street C 5 213 062.0 n9 Street C 5 214 0122 10 Street C 6 215 0208 10 Street D 5- 216 02.20 10 Street C 5- 217 0222 10 Street D 5 Marginal block 218 0228 10 Street D 5 219 0319 10 Street R d 220 0320 10 Street C 5 221 0321 10 Street R 5* Corner building only St. Mary's Church 222 0403 10 Street R 5 2.23 0405 10 Street C 5 224 0414 10 Street D d 225 0416 10 Street R d 226 0419 10 Street D 5- 227 0420 10 Street A 4 22.8 0501 10 Street. C+ 5 229 0502 10 Street NA 7 On demolition list 230 0504 10 Street NA 7 On demolition list 231 0507 10 Street C 6 232 0509 10 Street C+ 5 233 0517 10 Street D d 234 0518 10 Street C- 5 Page no. 00011 HUNTINGTON AFACT1 HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVFY EVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 235 052.0 10 Street D 6 236 0521 10 Street C 5 237 0601 10 Street D 5 Old 238 0605 10 Street D 5 239 0611 10 Street D 6 240 0612 10 Street C 5 241 0614-16 10 Street D d 242 0617-19 10 Street D 5- 243 0618 10 Street C 5 244 0621 10 Street C 5 245 0622 10 Street D .5 246 0623 10 Street C 5 247 0628 10 Street C+ 5 Good example 248 0701 10 Street C+ 5D* WPHD 249 0705 10 Street C- 5D* 14PHD 2.50 0707 10 Street C 5D* WPHD 251 0709 10 Street C 5D* WPHD 252 0912 10 Street- C+ 5D* WPHD 253 0920 (22) 10 Street C 5D* 14PHD 2.54 0928 10 Street C 5D* 14PHD 255 0931 10 Street C+ 5D* WPHD 256 0933 10 Street D 5D* WPHD 257 0935 10 Street D 5D* WPHD 258 0936 10 Street C+ 6 Looks very altered 'Page no. 00012. HUNTINGTON REACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12/()q/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Connients 2.59 0210 11 Street 5. Addn to survey block of workers cottages 260 0212. 11 Street 5 Addition to survey 261 0214 11 Street D 5 Altered 262 0216 11 Street 5 Addition to survey 263 0218 11 Street 5 Addition to survey 264 0210 11 Street 5 Addition to survey 265 022.0 11 Street 5 Addition to survey 266 0225 11 Street B 5* Good example of. type 267 0305 11 Street C 5 268 0313 11 Street D 6 2.69 0318 11 Street R- 5 270 0320 11 Street C 6 271 0323 11 Street D 5 272 0328 11 Street D 6 273 0357 11 Street R 3 Correct address? 274 0404 11 Street C+ 5 Only intact bldg on blk blk mostly altrd 275 0406 11 Street C 5- 276 0408 11 Street C- 5- 277 0410 11 Street D 6 Block mostly very altered 278 0412 11 Street B 5- 279 0426 11 Street A d (?) 428: Demolished Page no. 00013 HUNTINOTON RFAC71 HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVFY FVAIITATIONS 12/09/88 ;Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 2.80 0502 11 Street C 5 Altered 281 0500 11. Street R d 282 0510 11 Street D 5 283 0511 11 Street C 5* 284 0512 11 Street D 7 ? Not there 285 0515 11 Street C- 6 286 0518 11 Street D 5 287 052.1 11 Street D 5- 288 0522. 11 Street D 5- 289 0524 11 Street C- . 5 290 0528 11 Street C 5 291 0601 11 Street R- 5 292. 0614 11 Street C- 5- 293 0620 11 Street C- 5 294 0621 11 Street D d 295 0628 11 Street P 5- 296 0702 11 Street R 51)* Old WPHn 297 0710 11 Street D 6 Nice stone wall 298 0714 11 Street D 6 299 0802 11 Street C 5P* Intact Spanish bungalow block 1.TPHD 300 0808 11 Street C 5D# WPHD 301 0812 11 Street C 5D* WPM) Page no 00014 MJNTINCTON RFACH HIQTORIC DFSOTTRCFS gURVTi Y FVAI TTATIONS 12/OQ/88 Number Street T'ating NQ Cat Comments 302 0816 11 Street C 5T)* ITPT'D 3n3 OR2n 11 Street C 5D* ITPHT) 304 0828 11 Street C 5D* Intact Good gpanish bungalow block ITHD 305 OQ34 11 Street C 6 Altered 306 OQ52-5A 11 Street C 6 Altered 307 0201 12 Street C 5 Altered 308 0213-15 12 Street C 5 qnq 0217 12 Street C- 5 310 0220 12 Street ('- d 311 0221 12 Street C- 5 312 0227 12 Street (' 5 313 022R 19 Street C 5 314 0303 12 Street C d `A15 0311 12 Street D d 316 0312 12 Street C 5 317 0313 12 Street D 6 318 "15 12 Rtreet D 6 31Q 0317 12 Street C 5 320 n323 12 Street C F nemolished9 321 n503 12 Street C- 6 322 0506 12 Street C- A '493 0522 12 Street C- 6 Page no. 00015 HUNTINGTON REACH HISTORIC ';FSOTJRCF,S SURVEY EVALUATIONS 121N188 Nu.^iber Street 'eating NR Cat. Comments 32A 0525 12 Street C F 32.5 0606 12 Street C 5 326 n610 12 Street )1 5 327 0619 12 Street D 6 328 062.0 12. Street C- d 329 0623 12 Street C- 6 330 0626 12 Street C 5 331 n708 12 Street C- d 332 0712 12 Street C- d 333 0719 12 Street C- 6 334 n72.2 12. Street C 6 335 0730 12 Street C- 6 Can't find 336 0735 12. Street C- 6 Can't find 337 0741 12. Street C- 6 Can't find 33,9 0311 13 Street C 6 339 0312 13 Street C 6 340 031.5 13 Street P 6 341 032.3 13 Street n 6 342, 0606 13 Street 5 Addition to survey Craftsman court 343 0805 13 Street C 6 344 02.19 14 Street D 5- Minimal 345 0221 14 Street D 5 346 0303 14 Street D 5 Page no. M016 HUNTINGTON REACH! HISTORIC AFSOTFRCFS SITR`1FY EVAIUATIONS 12/09/RR Number Street Rating NP. Cat. Comments 347 0315 14 Street C- 5 348 0407 14 Street D 5 349 0414 14 Street NA NA Form--no listing Not picked up in field 350 0427 14 Street C+ 5 351 0504 14 Street C- d 352 060A 14 Street C 5 0602. (?) corner building 353 0614-16 14 Street C- 5 354 061.8 14 Street C+ 5 355 0724 14 Street T) 6 356 0726 14 Street D 6 357 0735 (a) 14 Street C 5 353 0506 15 Street C d 359 0514-16 15 Street C 5 360 0622-24 15 Street D 6 361 0202 17 Street D d 362 022.1 17 Street . P, d 363 0317 17 Street 7 Check date Possible addition to survey 364 0 326 17 Street D d 365 0608 17 Street C 6 366 0115 27. Street NA NA 0n demolition list 367 0117 22 Street NA NA On demolition list Page no. 00017 -MINTINGTON RFACH HISTORIC RFSOMCRS SURVEY EVALUATIONS Number Street Rating NTt Cat. Comments 368 012.1 22 Street C d 360 0714 Acacia Avenue D 7 Not there 370 0716 Acacia Avenue D 7 Not there 371 0806 Acacia Avenue C 5 372 0809 Acacia Avenue C 5 373 090E Acacia Avenue D 6 374 0910 Acacia Avenue C 5 375 0912 Acacia Avenue P 6 376 0914-16 Acacia Avenue C 5- 377 1012 Acacia Avenue P 6 378 1n13 Acacia Avenue C 5 379 1014-16 Acacia Avenue C 5 3R0 1015-17 Acacia Avenue C 6 381 HrY,-PS Acacia Avenue ( 5 3g2. 111? Acacia Avenue D 5 383 1114 Acacia Avenue C 5 3844 12.17 Acacia Avenue D 6 385 0201 Crest Avenue 5n* Addn to survey Altered Craftsman WPHD 386 0205-07 Crest Avenue C-. 5n# WP'-M 387 0211 Crest Avenue C 5n# WPHD 388 0216 Crest Avenue A 5* /5i* WPNn 389 0221 Crest Avenue C+ 7 Can't find 390 0224 Crest Avenue C 5D* Page no. 00n1R HUNTINGTON 'IrAC!". qISTmic RrsmiTz rS Si.RVFY F.vAL11ATIMS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 391 0302 Crest Avenue 5j)* ?qP.`in 392 0306 Crest Avenue R 5n# 31n: 6 393 0307 Crest Avenue A 5n# 394 0311 Crest Avenue B 5J)* 395 0323-3 1/2 Crest Avenue C+ 7 Can't find 396 032.5 Crest Avenue C- 5D* 321 iapTj 397 0326 Crest Avenue C- 5D* Altered iJPHn 398 0330 Crest Avenue R C;T)* WPHT) 399 0332 Crest Avenue C 5T)* 14Pi4.D 400 0421-2.3 Lake Street C 5 401. 0431-35 Lake Street T) 5# Signif. tyke J-9R6 also listed on tad 402 0505 Lake Street B 5 403 070A Lake Street C 7 Not there 404 0729 Lake Street A 5T)* Altered WPHT) 405 0737 Lake Street C- 5T)* idPHTI 406 1970 Lake Street B 3 407 1978 Lake Street B 3 408 1980 Lake Street B 3 409 0101-A 1/2 Main Street B/1 3 /3n r�sxn 410 0J.11-13 'fain Street B/1 3T) MST) 411. 0112-14 Main, Street B 5 Floor only Page no. 00019 HUNTINGTON RFACH HISTORIC RFSOURCFS SURVEY FVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 412 0115 Main Street R/2 3n MSHD 413 0116-6 1/2 Main Street CA 6 414 0117 Main Street CA 3n /NC MSM 415 0119-21 Main Street R+/2. 3n MSHD 416 0120 Main Street C/0## 3n MSHD 417 0122 Main Street A/1** 3D MSHD 418 012.3 Main Street R-/1 * 3D /NC MSHD 419 0124 Main Street R/2** 3D MSHD 420 0126 Main Street A/3 3n MSHD 421 0127 Main Street C/l 3n /NC MSHT) 422 02.01-03 Main Street C/0 3D /NC MSHD 423 0202 Main Street /0 3D /NC Addition to survey MSHD 424 0205 Main Street R/2 3D MSHD 425 0206 Main Street C/0 3D /NC MSHD (208) 426 0207 Main Street R/2 3T) MSHn 427 0209 Main Street C/2 3T) MSHD 42.8 0210-101/2 Main Street C/1 3D MSHD 429 0211 *lain Street C/2 3D MSHD 430 0212 Main Street C/i 31) MSHD 431 0213 Main Street C/2 3D /NC MSHD 432 02.14 Main Street CA 3D /NC MSHP 433 02.15 Main Street R/l 3D MSHD 434 0217 Main Street R/1 * 3D MSHD Page no. nnn2n TTiTNTINr;TON RFACH HISTORIC RRSnT RCFS ST.R«Y FITAITTATInNS 12./09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 435 0218 Main Street C-/n 3D /NC MSHD 436 022n Main Street C/1 3D MSHD 437 02.2.1 Main Street CA 3D MSHD 438 0222-2. 1/2 Main Street R/2 3n MSHD 439 022.3 Main Street C/1 3D MSHM 440 0224 Main Street R/1 3D MSHD 441 0226 Main Street R/2. 3n MSHD 442. 0228 Main Street A/3 3 /3n MSHD 443 0301 Main Street C/1 d 444 0305 Main Street C/2 6 (Unless historic) 445 0307 Main Street r,-In 6 (Unless historic) 446 0309 Main Street_ C-/n 6 (Unless historic) 447 0316-22 Main Street C/0 6 (Unless historic) 448 0410 Main Street R/O 5 449 0424 Main Street R/1 5 450 0428 Main Street . CA 6 451 0605 Main Street C+ 5 452 0607 Main Street C- 5 453 0609 Main Street R 5 454 061n Main Street C 5 455 0617 Main Street C- 6 456 0619 Main Street C 6 457 062.1-2.3 Main Street r: 6 458 0625 Main Street C. 5 Page no. On021 HTJNTINGTON RFAr,N ►TISTnRIr RrSOTJRCFS STJRVFY FVALTJATIONS 12/09/8R N wnher Street_ Rating NR Cat. Comments 459 062.7 Main Street R 5 Historic? 460 0711 Main Street r 5D* T+1PHD Street lamps 461 0713 Main Street r 5j)* WPHD 462 0717 Main Street R+ 5T)* WPTin 463 0718 Main Street r- 6 464 072.1 Main Street C 5D# WPHD 465 0722 Main Street r 5])* 14PHD 466 0724 Main Street r 5P* WPHD 467 0726 Main Street R 3 /5T)* WPHD 46P 0727 Main Street r 511* WPHD 469 0730 Main Street C 5D* WPHD 470 0731 Main Street R 5D* Good example WPHP 471 0734 Main Street C- 6 472 0735 Main Street R 5D* TdPHD 473 0737 Main Street C 5n# Altered WPHD 474 073R-40 Main Street 11+ 3 /5n# WPHD 475 0741 Main Street C 5T)* WPHD 476 n742 Main Street C 5n# Altered WPHD 477 0752 Main Street C 5P* Altered FIPHP 478 0755 Plain Street C 5D* WPHD 479 O80t main Street T) 5D* WPHD Page no. 00022 TTTTNTINrTON TtRAr!i T4ISTnRIC nr..SnTTRCFS SURVEY EVALUATIONS 1.2/09/PP. Number Street Rating NP Cat. Comments 480 OPO4 Main Street C+ 5Tl# WPHD 481 08n6 Main Street R SP# Tower WPHD 482. 0810 Main Street R 5T)* TATPHD 4R3 0814-16 Main Street R 5T)* Good example WPIm 484 0815 Main Street R 5T)* 14PHD 485 0817 Main Street C+ 5D* WPIT 486 0R21 Main Street C 6 WPIM 4R7 0825 Main Street 5T)* T%THD Addn to survey 2 s American Col. 488 0833 Main Street D 5D* WPHD (935) 489 0902 Main Street C 5I)* WPn 490 0908 Main Street C+ 5T)# WPU 491 0912.-14 Main Street C+ 5T)* WPTIm 492 091E Main Street O- 6 493 0920 Main Street C- 6 494 0924 Main Street C- 6 495 1010 Main Street T) 6 496 1024 Main Street C+ 6 497 1030 Main Street C- 6 498 1104 Main Street C- 6 499 1129 Main Street C 5- Check date 500 1P02 Main Street C 6 Page no. 00023 IUINTINGTnN 1s17ACR HISTORIC RRSOITRCRS SURVEY RVAITTATIONS 12/09/8R Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 501 1812 Main Street T) 6 502 1814 Main Street C- 6 503 1816 Main Street C 5 504 1905 Main Street A 3 505 0316 Olive Avenue A/3 3 /3T) MSHn 506 0411 Olive Avenue R/2 T) MSSgD 507 06n7 Olive Avenue n d 508 0608 Olive Avenue T) 6 509 0715 Olive Avenue C 5 Fire 510 0717 Olive Avenue C 5 511 0914-16 Olive Avenue C 6 512 1111 Olive Avenue T) 5 513 11.12 Olive Avenue T) 6 514 1113 Olive Avenue T) 5- 515 12.1.3 Olive Avenue R 5* (1.211) 516 1406-OF Olive Avenue C 5 51.7 0200 Orange Avenue C d 518 02% Orange Avenue P d 519 031.0 ()range Avenue T) 5 520 0414 Orange Avenue R- d 521 041P Orange Avenue (11 d 52.2. 0614 Orange Avenue C 5 523 0711 ()range Avenue 1) 6 (707?) 524 0712 Orange Avenue T) 6 Page no. n0024 HITNTINGTON RRACK HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12./09/RR Number Street Raring NR Cat. Continents 525 0902 Orange Avenue C 7 d 526 0907 Orange Avenue 5 Addition to survey 1920s Craftsman 527 0914 Orange Avenue C 5 528 1105 Orange Avenue T) 6 529 1107 Orange Avenue D 6 (1111?) 530 1410 Orange Avenue C 5- Altered 531 0110 Pacific Coast R 5 Highway 532. n1I.4 Pacific Coast A 3 Highway 533 0304 Pacific Coast A d Highway 534 0306 Pacific Coast A/3 d Highway 535 031.( Pacific Coast R/2 6 Unless historic Highway 536 0406 Pacific Coast C/1 T) MSHD Highway 537 0408 Pacific Coast C/1 3T) MSHD Highway 538 0410 Pacific Coast C/1 3n /NC MSHD Highway 539 0414-16 Pacific Coast C/1#* 3D MSHD Highway (470?) 540 0520 Pacific Coast R 6 Highway 541 Rait Shop Pacific Coast R/2 3D Huntington Reach Highway Pier 542 Cornerstou Pacific Coast. R/2 3D Huntington Reach Highway Pier Page no. (Y)025 ITI NTINr.TnN 'RRArR TUSTnpir, RpsnuRCFS SURVEY YVALUATIONS 12/09/RR Number Street Mating NR Cat. Comments 543 Pier Fntry Pacific Coast R/2 3D Huntington Reach Highway Pier 544 Pier Shops Pacific Coast R/2. 3D Huntington Reach Highway Pier 545 0601 Pala Avenue 7 Form--no listing Demolished? 546 OP 14 Palm Avenue R 5T)* WPT D Street trees 547 o90n Palm Avenue R SD# WPHD 548 n907 Palm Avenue C 5 549 1114 Palm Avenue r 5 550 1411 Palm Avenue D d 551 1502 Palm Avenue A 3 552 16no (b) Palm Avenue A 3 553 1817 Park Street A 5* 554 IF?37 Park Street C 6 ? Check date maybe 1.940s 555 0205-07 Pecan Avenue D 5 556 0343 Pecan Avenue r 5 557 0601 Pecan Avenue T1 d 558 0608 Pecan Avenue D d 550 0612 Pecan Avenue r 6 560 0613 Pecan Avenue 7 Addition to survey 561 0712.-14 Pecan Avenue 5 Form--no listing 562 0713 Pecaii Avenue C 5 563 09nR Pecan Avenue C 5 Page no. 00026 MJNTINrTnN RPACTT HISTnpIC RFSnTJRrES STJRVFY FVALTJATInNS 12./09/RP Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 564 0912 Pecan Avenue D d 565 n914 Pecan Avenue n d 566 1009 Pecan .Avenue D d 567 1011 Pecan Avenue T) d (1101?) 568 1012 Pecan Avenue T) 6 569 181.5 Pine Street C 5 Check history 570 1P40 Pine Street C 5 Check date 571 01.19 Walnut Avenue T) 5 572 0214 Walnut Avenue D 6 573 0311 Walnut Avenue R/2 31) MSF?D 574 0412-14 Walnut Avenue R/2 3J) MSHD 575 0501 Walnut Avenue 3D /NC Addition to survey 576 0503-05 Walnut Avenue 3D /Nr Addition to survey 577 n513-19 Walnut Avenue A 1 /3T) MSHD 57P 0705 Walnut Avenue T) 5- 579 070P Walnut Avenue C 7 d 5Pn 071.2 Walnut Avenue C- 5 581 0716-19 Walnut Avenue R 6 Check date 5P2 OP11 Walnut Avenue C 5 583 1210 Walnut Avenue; C+ 5- Marginal 5P4 1520 Walnut Avenue C 6 585 5141-71 Warner Avenue C 5* Did not inspect 586 0300 Yorktown A 3 5g7 n333 Yorktown R 5 ? Did not inspect Pale no. 00027 HUNTINCTON RrprTJ HISTORIC RRSnTjRCRS STJRVRY FVAI.TJATInNS 17/nQl8P Nu,nber Street Rating; NR Cat. Comments 588 n33_'. Yorktown P. 5 ? Did not inspect HUNGTINGTON BEACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS Listed by National Register Eligibility Category Page no. 00001 HUNTINu-fON REACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SUkvr.,Y EVALUATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 1 0128 (12.6) 06 Street A 1 /3D MSHD 2 0513-19 Walnut Avenue A 1 /3D MSHD 3 0421 08 Street A 3 4 0357 11 Street R 3 Correct address? 5 1970 Lake Street R 3 6 1978 Lake Street R 3 7 1980 Lake Street R 3 8 1905 Main Street A 3 9 0114 Pacific Coast A 3 Highway 10 1502 Palm Avenue A 3 11 1600 (b) Palm Avenue A 3 12 0300 Yorktown A 3 13 0204 05 Street A/3 3 /3D MSHD 14 0101-9 1/2 Main Street R/l 3 /3T) MSHP 15 0228 Main Street A/3 3 /31) MSHn 16 0316 Olive Avenue A/3 3 /3n MSHD 17 072.6 Main Street R 3 /51)# WPHD 18 0738-40 Main Street R+ 3 /5T)* WPHD 19 02.21 03 Street R/2 3D MSHD 20 0121 05 Street R/l 3D MSHD 21 0122 05 Street R/2 3D MSHD ,22 0206 05 Street C/2 3n MSHD 23 0214 05 Street C+/2 3D MSHD Page no. 00002. MTNTIi..,lY1N RFACH HISTORIC RRS011RrPS SU.k-PY RVAIUATIONS 12/09/A8 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 24 0215 05 Street D- 3D MSHD 25 0119 06 Street 3n MSHD Addition to survey 1 s Craftsman 26 012.5 06 Street TP. 3D MSHD 27 0129 OF Street 3D MEq D Addition to survey 2 s Craftsman 28 0111-13 Main Street R/1 3D M.SHD 29 0115 Main Street R/2 31) MSHD 30 0119-21 Main Street p+/2. 3n MSHD 31 012.0 Main Street C/0** 3P MSHD 32 012.2. Main Street A/1** 3D MSHD 33 0124 Main Street R/2#* 31) MSHP 34 0126 Main Street A/3 3D MSHD 35 0205 Main Street R/2 3D MSHD 36 0207 Main Street R/2 3D MSHD 37 0209 Main Street C/2 3D MSHJI 38 0210-101/2 Main Street C/1 3D MSHD 39 02.11 Main Street C/2 3n MSHD 40 0212. Main Street C/1 3D MSHD 41 0215 Main Street R/1 3D MSHD 42 0217 Main Street R/J** 31) MSHD 43 0220 Main Street CA 3n MSHD 44 0221 Main Street C/1 3D MSHD 45 0222.-2 1/2 Main Street R/2 3D MSHD Page no. 00003 HUNT1,—i'ON REACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SDn+FY EVALUATIONS 1'2/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 46 0223 Main Street CA 37) MSM 47 02.24 Main Street R/l 3D MSHD 48 0226 Main Street. R/2 3D MSHD 49 0411. Olive Avenue R/2 31) MSHD 50 0406 Pacific Coast C/1 3D MSHD Highway 51 0408 Pacific Coast CA 3D MSHD Highway 52 0414-1.6 Pacific Coast C/1## 31) MSHD Highway (470?) 53 Bait Shop Pacific Coast R/2 3D Huntington Reach Highway Pier 54 Cornerston Pacific Coast R/2 31) Huntington Reach Highway Pier 55 Pier Entry Pacific Coast 11/2 3D Huntington Reach Highway Pier 56 Pier Shops Pacific Coast R/2 3D Huntington Reach Highway Pier 57 031.1 Walnut Avenue R/2 3D MSHD 58 0412-14 Walnut Avenue R/2 3D MSHD 59 02.10 05 Street R/1 3D INC MSHD 60 0117 Main Street_ CA 3D INC MSHD 61 0123 Main Street R-/1#* 3D INC MSHD. 62 0127 Main Street C/1 3P INC MSHD 63 0201-03 Main Street C/O 3D INC MSHD 64 0202 Main Street /0 3D INC Addition to survey MSHD 65 0206 Main Street C/0 3D INC MSHD (2.08) Page no. 00004 I-RTNTI:,,,!'o1N RFACH HISTORIC RFSOURCFS SUkVFY FVALTTATIONS _ W09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 66 0213 Main Street C/2 31) /NC MSHD 67 0214 Main Street C/1 3n /NC MSHn 68 0218 Main Street ('-/0 3D /NC MSHD 69 0410 Pacific Coast C/1 3n INC MSHD Highway 70 0501 Walnut Avenue 3n INC Addition to survey 71 0503-05 Walnut Avenue 3n /NC Addition to survey 72 0401 06 Street A 4 Cluster 73 0420 10 Street A 4 74 0218-20 05 Street C-/3 4 /3n MSU 75 012.1 02 Street 5 Addition to survey 76 02.08 02 Street T) 5 77 n115-17 03 Street C/2 5 On demolition list 78 0220 03 Street ('- 5 79 0310 03 Street R 5 80 0318 03 Street C- 5 81 0320 03 Street C 5 F2 0405 03 Street C 5 83 0407 03 Street C 5 84 0409 03 Street C 5 85 0301 05 Street C-/1 5 86 0311 05 Street R-/?. 5 87 0313 05 Street C/O 5 88 0328 05 Street C/2 S Page no. 00005 HUNTIn.._L'ON REACH HISTORIC RESOURCES S[JkvFY EVALUATIONS W09/SA Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 89 0211 06 Street C 5 90 0217 O6 Street n 5 91 0220 06 Street J) 5 92 0223 06 Street C+ 5 On demolition list 93 0308 06 Street C 5 Cluster 94 0310-12 06 Street C+ 5 Cluster 95 0313 06 Street C 5 Cluster 96 0317 06 Street C 5 Cluster 97 032.3-27 06 Street C+ _5 Cluster 98 032.8 06 Street C 5 Cluster 99 0409 06 Street C 5 Cluster 10n 0411 06 Street C 5 Cluster 101 0501 06 Street C 5 102 0509 06 Street C 5 103 0515 06 Street C 5 104 0519 06 Street C S 105 0603 06 Street R 5 106 0111-15 07 Street R- 5 107 0121 07 Street C 5 108 012.3 O7 Street C 5 109 0124 07 Street R- 5 110 0127 O7 Street C 5 111 0215 07 Street C 5 112 0311 07 Street C 5 Page no. 00006 HT.1NTLvjfON REACH HISTORIC RpSnTJ'ZrPS SUkVFY EVALUATIONS . 12/09/8R Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 113 0312. 07 Street C 5 114 031.6 n7 Street C 5 115 0317 07 Street C+ 5 116 032.2 n7 Street C 5 117 0402 07 Street C 5 118 OA06 07 Street C 5 119 0410 07 Street C 5 120 OAl2. 07 Street C 5 121 0427 07 Street C 5 122 0506 n7 Street 5 123 0508 07 Street C 5 12.4 0514 07 Street C 5 125 0523 n7 Street T1 5 12.6 0527 07 Street C 5 127 06n1 07 Street r, 5 128 0605 07 Street C 5 129 0609 07 Street C 5 130 0613 07 Street C 5 131 0617 n7 Street C 5 132 0619 07 Street C 5 133 0115 OR Street 5 Good example 134 0125 08 Street C 5 135 0206 08 Street C 5 136 0212 08 Street C 5 Good example Page no. 000n7 HUNTINGTO N 'RrACH HISTnRIr RPSOTTRCT:S ST.TRVV.Y EVALUATIONS 12/09/8A Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 137 0215 O8 Street C+ 5 Good example 138 0220 08 Street (' 5 139 02.27 08 Street r+ 5 Good example 140 0315 OR Street C 5 141 0318 08 Street T) 5 142 0322 .08 Street C 5 143 0327 08 Street T1 5 144 0404 08 Street C 5 145 0408 08 Street 1) 5 146 0409 08 Street C 5 147 0411 OR Street 0 5 Looks like farmhouse 148 0412 08 Street n 5 149 0426 08 Street C+ 5 150 0501 08 Street C 5 151 0507 08 Street 5 Addition to survey 152 0514 08 Street C 5 Altered 153 0515 08 Street C 5 154 0518 08 Street C 5 155 0521 nP Street C 5 156 052.7 0R Street C 5 157 0601 08 Street C+ 5 158 0605 08 Street C 5 159 0610 OR_ Street C 5 160 0613 08 Street C 5 Page no. OnOO8 HUNTIh,.,.t'ON MACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS .12/n9/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 161 0614 nR Street n 5 162 0619 08 Street C 5 163 0621 OR Street C 5 164 0622 OR Street C 5 1.65 0627 OR Street C 5 166 0115 OQ Street C 5 167 0201 09 Street R 5 Good example 168 0207 09 Street n 5 169 0211 n9 Street R 5 Very Victorianized TOC 170 0215 09 Street R 5 171 0217 09 Street R S 172 0219 09 Street C 5 173 0221 nQ Street C 5 174 022.4 09 Street C 5 175 0277 09 Street C 5 176 0506 0Q Street C 5 177 0508 09 Street C 5 178 052.4 n9 Street C 5 179 0610 00 Street C 5 180 0614 00 Street n 5 181 061.6 09 Street C 5 182 0618 nQ Street C 5 183 0620 09 Street C. 5 Page no. 00009 WNTINGTON nRACH HISTORIC RFSOTTRr'PS SURVEY EVALUATIONS 12/09/R8 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 184 0222 10 Street T) S Marginal block. 185 02.28 10 Street P 5 186 0320 10 Street r 5 187 0403 10 Street 5 188 0405 10 Street C 5 189 0501 10 Street C+ 5 190 0509 10 Street C+ 5 191 0518 10 Street C- 5 192 0521 10 Street C 5 193 0601 10 Street n 5 Old 194 06n5 10 Street n 5 195 0612 10 Street r 5 196 0618 10 Street C 5 197 0621 10 Street C 5 198 062.2 10 Street n 5 1.99 0623 10 Street C 5 200 062E 10 Street C+ 5 Good example 201 02.10 11 Street S Addn to survey block of workers cottages 202. 0212. 11. Street 5 Addition to survey 203 0214 11 Street T1 5 Altered 204 0216 11 Street 5 Addition to survey 205 0218 11 Street 5 Addition to survey 206 0219 11 Street 5 Addition to survey Page no. 00010 HUNTINGTON RPACH HISTnRIC RESnTIRCES SURVEY EVALUATIONS -12./09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 207 022.0 11 Street 5 Addition to survey 2n8 0305 11 Street C 5 209 0318 11 Street ►;- 5 210 0323 11 Street n 5 211 0404 11 Street C+ 5 Only intact bldg on blk blk mostly altrd 2.12 0502 11 Street C 5 Altered 213 0510 11 Street n 5 214 0518 11 Street n 5 215 0524 11 Street C- 5 216 052.8 11 Street C 5 217 0601 11 Street �- 5 21.8 0620 11 Street C- 5 219 0201. 12 Street C 5 Altered 220 0213-15 12 Street C 5 2.21 021.7 1.2 Street C- 5 222. 022.1 12 Street C- 5 22.3 0227 12 Street C 5 2.24 022.8 12 Street r 5 225 031.2 12 Street C 5 226 0317 12 Street C 5 227 0606 12 Street C 5 228 0610 12 Street n 5 229 0626 12 Street C 5 Page no. 00011 MINTINGTON RFACH HISTORIC RRSOURCFS .SURVFY FVAITJATIONS 12/09/R8 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 230 0606 13 Street 5 Addition to survey Craftsman court 231 0221 14 Street J) 5 232 0303 14 Street P 5 233 0315 14 Street C- 5 234 0407 14 Street J) 5 235 0427 14 Street C+ 5 236 0604 14 Street C 5 06n2 (?) corner building 237 0614-16 14 Street C- 5 238 061.8 14 Street C+ 5 239 0514-16 15 Street C 5 240 0806 Acacia Avenue C 5 241 0809 Acacia Avenue C 5 242 0910 Acacia Avenue C 5 243 101.3 Acacia Avenue C 5 244 1014-16 Acacia Avenue C 5 245 1106-08 Acacia Avenue C 5 246 1112. Acacia Avenue n 5 247 1114 Acacia Avenue C 5 2.48 042.1-23 Lake Street C 5 249 0505 Lake Street R 5 250 0112-14 Main Street R 5 Floor only 251 0410 Main Street F/0 5 252 0424 Main Street R/1 5 Page no. n0012 RTINTINrTON RFACFT TiISTORIC RT'SnURCRS STIR«Y RVAITTATIONS 12/09/88 Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 253 0605 Main Street C+ 5 254 n607 Main Street C- 5 255 0609 Main Street R 5 256 o6in Main Street C 5 257 062.5 Main Street 5 25P 062.7 Main Street R 5 Historic? 259 1816 Main Street C 5 2.60 0715 Olive Avenue C 5 Fire 261 0717 Olive Avenue C 5 262 1111 Olive Avenue n 5 263 1406-08 Olive Avenue C 5 264 031.0 Orange Avenue n 5 265 0614 Orange Avenue C 5 266 0007 Orange Avenue 5 Addition to survey 1920s Craftsman 267 0914 Orange Avenue C 5 268 Olin Pacific Coast u 5 Highway 2.69 0907 Palm Avenue C 5 270 1.114 Palm Avenue C 5 271 n205-n7 Pecan Avenue T) 5 272 0343 Pecan Avenue C 5 273 0712-14 Pecan Avenue 5 Fora—no .listing 274 0713 Pecan Avenue C 5 2.75 090P Pecan Avenue C 5 Page no. 00013 F1TINTINrTnN REACH HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY FVAII1ATIONS 12/OQ/RP Number Street Rating NR rat. Comments 276 1R15 Pine Street C 5 Check history 277 .18An Pine Street C 5 Check date 278 O119 Walnut Avenue 1) 5 279 0712 Walnut Avenue C- 5 2.RO OP11 Walnut Avenue C 5 281 0112 07 Street 5 (?) Addition to survey 2.82 0602 07 Street 5 (?) Addition to survey 283 0616 07 Street 5 (?) Addition to survey 284 062.3 07 Street 5 (?) Addition to survey 2R5 0333 Yorktown R 5 ? Did not inspect 286 0333 Yorktown n 5 ? Did not inspect 287 0317 05 Street C/2 5* Good example of type 2PR 0321 05 Street Good example of type 2R4 0415 06 Street On demolition list Cluster Good example 290 0326 07 Street R- 5 Good example of. type 291 0401-03 07 Street H 5# Cood example of type 292 0428 07 Street R 5* Good example of type 293 0503 07 Street C+ 5 Good example of type 294 0123 08 Street C+ 5# rood example of type 295 0301 OR Street R 5* 296 0321 10 Street R 5# Corner building only St. Mary's Church 297 0225 11 Street R 5# rood example of type Page no. n0014 1n1NTINrTnN nFACH HISTORIC RFSnURCFS S1JR10'.Y rVAL11ATInNS 12/09/88 Nuwber Street Rating NR Cat. Conn,ients 29P 0511. 11. Street C 5* 299 0735 (a) 14 Street C 5* 300 0411-35 Lake Street T) 5* Signif.. type 1986 also listed on 2nd 3n1 1.213 nlive Avenue 5* (1211) 302 1817 Park Street A 5* 303 5141.-71 !darner Avenue C 5* Did not inspect 3n4. n3n3 03 Street A/3 5* /31) MST) 5* if 1885 date verified 305 n406 09 Street C 5* /5D* NSHn 306 021.6 Crest Avenue A 5* /5n# WPHD 307 041E 07 Street n 5- 30F 0422-24 08 Street C 5- 109 0510 n8 Street C 5- 310 02.0F In Street n 5- 311. 022.0 In Street C 5- 312 0419 In Street n 5- 313 0617-19 In Street n 5- 31A n4n6 11 Street C 5- 31.5 008 1.1 Street C- 5- 316 0412 11 Street R 5- 317 0521 11 Street n 5- 31F 0522 1.1 Street 11 5- 319 061A 11 Street C- 5- Page no, nO015 1iT.INTINCTnN TtrACN TTISTORIC RFSnLTRCFS STTRVFY RVA.I.TUTI0NS 121091R8 Number Street Rating- NR Cat. Comments 320 062R I.I. Gtreet n 5- 121 n219 14 Street Tl 5- Minimal 322 O014-1.6 Acacia Avenue C 5- 323 11.29 Main Street C 5- Check date 324 11.13 Clive Avenue n 5- :)25 141n Orange Avenue C 5- Altered 326 0705 Walnut Avenue n 5- 327 1210 Walnut Avenue C+ 5- Marginal 32P 0310 09 Street C 5T)* NSTU) 329 031.1 09 Street C Sn* NSHD 330 0314 09 Street C 5n# NSHD 331 0315-17 09 Street C 5T)* NSTI 332 031f O9 Street NSHP 'A33 n320 n9 Street C 5n* NS1-Ln 334 0321 nq Street r, 5n* NSTin 335 0323 00 Street C 5T)* NSH1) 336 0324 OQ Street n 5n* NST1T) 337 0327 nQ Street C 5n* NSHT) 338 004 09 Street C 5n NS.FT1 339 005 n9 Street C 5n NSHn 34O 0407 00 Street C 5T)* NSTTT) 341, 0410 09 Street C 5T)* NST3D 342. 0411. 09 Street C 5D* NSFM 343 041.2 n4 Street C 5T)* NSHD Page no 00016 MTNTINrTnN nFArH TIIgTnRTr RFSnTTRrFc STTRVFY FVAITTATInNq 12/nQ/SR Number Street Rat1116 NR rat Coc,unents 144 0414 00 Street STl# NCTTT) 145 n41 S O9 street ('+ 5P* NSHP 146 n416 n9 Street T) ST)* NSHP 147 041R-10 00 Street r ST)* NSHP 148 0419 09 Street C SPA' NSHP 349 0421-29 00 Street r 5P# NRHP 450 n4q? O9 Street r C;D* NSTM i5] n427 00 Street r ST)* NSTM 152 0701 In Street �'+ 5T)* GTPTin q53 0705 In Street r- 5P* TATPFM q-,4 n7m In Street r 5T)* TgPTM '�55 n700 In Street r 5T)3` WPHD '156 00I2 In street C+ ST)* WPHP 357 no20 (22) 10 Street r 5T)* WPTM 358 nQ2S In Street r ST)* WPHP 359 nQii 10 Street r+ Sn* TjPHn 4(10 nQ31 in Street T) 5P* WPHT) 061 0935 10 Street T) 5P* WPT-TD 162 0702 11 Street u Sn Old WPTM '*3 OQnq 11 street (' SP# Intact Spanish bun8alow block 1 JPT-TT1 064 OROS 11 Street r 5P'° TTPNP 365 nS12 11 Street r sn* WP" Page uo. 00017 R NTINnTnN REACH HISTnRIC RESOURCES SURVEY EATAL?TATIONS 17/na/Rp Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 366 np,1.1; 11 Street C 5P# WPNP 367 nA2n 11 Street C 57)# GipT;ll 368 0ft2R 11 Street C 5T)* Intact Good Spanish bungalow block Wp" 369 0201 Crest Avenue 57)* Addn to survey Altered Craftsman WPHD 370 0205-07 Crest Avenue C- 5T)# WPHD 371 0211 Crest Avenue C 5T)* WPT-M 372 n224 Crest Avenue C 5T)* 373 03n2. Crest Avenue Sn 14PTiT1 374 0306 Crest Avenue n 375 0307 Crest Avenue A 511* 376 0311 Crest Avenue R 511'f 377 0325 Crest Avenue C- 5D* 321 WPTlP 178 n326 Crest Avenue C- 5T)* Altered WPHP 379 n33n Crest Avenue R 5T)* WPHn ipo n332 Crest Avenue C 5D* WPTIO 3181 0729 lake Street A 5T)* Altered TdPT�T1 382 0737 Lake Street C- 5T)* WPT-M 383 0711 "lain Street C 5T1# WPTIO Street lamps 384 0713 Maiii Street C 5T)* TdP???) Page no. nnn18 HTTNTINr.TnN PrACT4 TTISTnRIC RRSniTRrFq STTRVFY FVAIITATIONS 12/nQ/R8 Nuwber Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 385 0717 Main Street R+ 5n* wPHn 3R6 072.1 Maici Street C ST)* WPNm 387 072.2 Main Street C 51)* hiPTaT) 3R8 072.4 Main Street C 5T)* �`1PNn '189 0727 Main Street (11 5D* WPHD 390 0730 Main Street C. 5I)* WPIM 391 0731 Main Street R 5n* rood example 1�1PrU) 392 07?5 Main Street u 5P* WPgD 393 0737 Main Street C 5T)* Altered WPHD 394 0741 Maiii Street C 5n* wpjT) 395 0742 Main Street (7 5D* Altered T'IPTT) 396 0752 *lain Street C 5n* Altered TIPHP ?97 0755 Main Street C 5T)* T'IP 398 ORni. Main Street T) 5T)* WPTTT) ?Qq 0Rn4 Main Street C+ 5T)* TJPTTD 400 nf'm Main Street n 5Dj` Tower WP-" 401 0810 Main Street R 5P# WPHD 402 0814-16 Main Street R 5n* Good example WPHD 403 0815 Main Street R 5D* TJPTID 404 n817 Main Street C+ 5D* TI►PT1n 405 0825 Main Street 5Ti# WP"D Addn to survey 2 s American Col. Pa6e no 0001(l ITTINTTNCTnq RPAC11 HISTORIC RFSnTTPfTS STIRITY FIIAILTATInNS 12/0()/RR Number Street Ratin6 NI? Cat Coimmeuts 406 OPII Maid Street T) qj)* 14PT-TD ('"s) 407 nQn2 Main Street C rT)* WP" lop nQOP Main Street n+ ST)* 14PHP Ono CQ 12-14 Main Street n+ 5n* WPTMM 41n np14 Palm Avenue R 5T)* IIPM) street trees 411 nQnn Palm Avenue R 5T)* r,rpT� 412 0112-16 02 Street T) h 61*� nl15 02 Street T) h 414 0222 n2 Street T) h 415 n21n n2 Street C h 416 oin9 02 Street (' h 417 0310 02 Street T) h 418 ng12 n2 Street (1- 6 L10 nil' 02 Street n 42n 0'116-l4 09 Strc.(.t T) F 421 0417 n? Street T) h 422 0°21 n2 Street C- h 42q 0225 05 Street C-/1 h zL9L n3ns 05 Street T) h 425 0611 05 Street P h 426 0 215 n6 Street C 6 427 0126 07 Street (' h 428 0413 07 Street T) 6 Page no. On02n ITI?NTINGTON TMAru HISTnnIr RRSnTTR.rVq SIT.VVY RVAITTATInNS 12/n01P8 Number Street Ratinb NR rat. Comments 420 0504 07 Street T1 6 430 0510 n7 Street C 6 431 0526 n7 Street n 6 432. 0627 07 Street C 6 433 0317-19 nR Street T) 6 434 061P-20 0R Street R- 6 Very altered 4?5 0206 09 Street. n 6 436 0216 _ 09 Street n 6 437 05n2 n9 Street ►' 6 438 0602 no Street C 6 439 01.22. 10 Street C 6 G40 05n7 In Street r ALL 0520 In Street D 6 A42 0611 1n Street T) 6 44,, n936 in Street Cl 6 looks very altered 444 0313 11 Street n 6 445 032.0 11 Street C 6 446 032E 11 Street T) 6 447 n41n 11 Street T) 6 Rlock mostly very - altered 44S ()515 1.1 Street C- 6 449 0710 11 Street T1 6 Nice stone wall. 450 0714 11 Street T) 6 451 0934 11 Street r 6 Altered Page no 00021 MYNTINf TON 'RFA("i 'iISTnDIr RPzouv l; STTRVF'Y FVALUATInNS 12/no/pp vuruber Street Rattng NR ('at Comments 4s2 nns?-54 11 gtrect r Altered 451 0'113 12 Street n 6 454 Miq 1? Street T) 6 455 0123 1? Street (' 6 Demolished? Ass orm 12 Street C- 6 457 0906 12 street ('- F 45F Or,?2 12 street n- 6 459 n52s 12 street n 6 46n 0610 1? Street n 6 461 W? 12 Street n- F A62 0719 12 Street F A6 3 0722 12 Street r 6 464 0730 12 Street ('- 6 nan't find 465 n7A5 l? Street ('- F Can't find 666 074'1 12 Street ('- 5 Can't find 467 null 11 Street (' A6Q n112 11 Street r 460 n'ls 11 street T) 6 470 n113 11 Street n 1; 471 nFOq 11 Street (' 6 472 n724 14 Street T1 F 47,A n726 14 Street T) 6 47[ n622-?4 15 street T` 0; 475 n6nR 17 Street n 6 Pa6e no nn022 TITTNTTNCTnN T'FACTI HIS'T'npIr nFCnilvCFc WRIMY FVAITTATInNS Nwiber Street Ratin6 NP Cat nomments 176 nonR Acacia Avenue T) 6 A77 0012 Acacia Avenue T) F 478 1n12 Acacia Avenue T1 A 479 101S-17 Acacia Avenue C 6 APO 1217 Acacia Avenue n 6 ASS n116-6 1/2 Maze Ftreet C/1 6 4R2 03ns MdIlL Street C/2 6 (Unless historic) 4Q'I 0107 Main street C-In 6 (Unless historic) !P4 0000 "ain gtreet C_/n A (Tlnless historic) 495 0.16-99 �,dii, Street (-/n F (Unless historic) L96 PA9P Mdin gtreet C/1 6 4R7 0617 Mdzn street C- rN APR nFlo Main street n 6 4R0 n621-20 Mai a street C A 490 071R Main street 6 401 0714 Main Qtreet C- 6 492 OR21 Maia ',treet C TATDIM 4Q-1 ne lR ;�Iai,i gtreer C- h A94 nngn Main street C- 6 Z,Q5 0924 Plain ',treet C- 6 406 lnln Main Street T) 6 407 1024 Main street C+ A h9R 1010 Main Street C- 6 409 11% Main street C- 6 Page no. 0O023 H1NTINf;TnN ^.r.A('TT .N.ISTOTtIC FF.SOTTP FS, ST1R`>FY FVALUATInNS J.2./n9/RR Number Street Ttatii% N. R. Cat. Comments 500 18n2 Main Street C 6 501 1R12 Main Street T) 6 502 1914 Maim Street C- 503 n6nR Olive Avenue T) 6 504 n914-1.6 Olive Avenue C 6 5n5 1112 Olive Avenue T) A 506 n71.1 Orange Avenue T) F (7n7?) 5n7 0719 Oranbe Avenue n 6 IMP IIn5 Orange Avenue n F 509 1107 Orange Avenue n 6 (1111?) 510 0319 Pacific Coast P•/? Unless historic TTi6hway 511 0520 Pacific Coast R. N_i ohwa y 512 0612 Pecan Avenue (' 6 51.3 10V Pecan Ave►iue P 6 514 0214 Walnut Avenue T) � 51.5 0716-1R walnut Avenue R 6 Check date 516 152n T,Talnut Avenue C 6 517 IP37 Park Street C 6 ? Check date maybe 194ns 51R n412 05 Street C 7 d 51.9 0502 In Street NA 7 On demolition list 52.n n504 1n Street NA 7 On demolition list 521 051.2 11 Street n 7 ? Not there Page no, nnn24 TITTNTIN'7,TON ';FACT TTISTORIC T?FSnT1RCFS SLTRIMY F.VAI.TTATIONS 12/n9/8R Number Street Rating NR Cat. Comments 5,22 n?17 17 Street 7 Check date Possible addition to survey 52? 0714 Acacia Avenue D 7 Not there 524 n716 Acacia Avenue D 7 Not there 525 02?1 Crest Avenue C+ 7 Can't find 1;26 0323-3 1/? Crest Avenue C+ 7 Can't find 52.7 07n4 Lake Street C 7 Not there 528 0902 Orarroe Avenue C, 7 d 529 n6nl Pala Avenue 7 Forte-no listing Demolished? 530 061.3 Pecan Avenue 7 Addition to survey 511 0708 TJaluut Avenue r 7 d 532. 01A1.A 16 Street NA NA Form--no listiriT; Not picked up in .field 533 0115 22 Street NA NA On demolition list 5?1, n11.7 22 Street NA NA nrr demolition list 535 0127 n2 Street C d 536 nII-8 03 Street d 537 012.2. n3 Street D d 53P 0421 n6 Street C- d 539 nA23 06 Street C d 540 0320 07 Street C d 541 0422. n7 Street D d 542 0607 n7 Street D d Page no. n0025 TTT)N'T'INGTnN n.PA1714 NISTMIC n.rSnTTRCFS STT T.Y VVAITTATIONS 12/nQ/RF Number Street Patin&. NQ Cat. Coc,mients 543 011.2 0R Street C d 544 n116 OR Street C d 545 02'n9 nR Street C d 546 0214 0A Street D d 547 n413 nS Street T1 d 548 05n6 OR Street n d 549 06na nR Street C d 550 05n5 n9 Street C d 551 0507 no Street T' d 552 0509-11 nQ Street n d 553 n510 09 Street P d 554 0319 10 Street R d 555 OA14 1.0 Street T) d 956 0416 In Street R d 557 051.7 In Street T) d r 55P 0614-16 In Street P d 559 050Q 11 Street "R d 560 062.1 11 Street T) d 561 n22n 1? Street C- d 562. 03n3 12 Street C d 563 n311. 12 Street n d 564 062n 12 Street C- d 565 n7nR 12. Street C- d 566 0712 12 Street C- d Pate no. n002h MINTINr,TnN nVACT4 HISTM.Ir RFSOTTRCFS STIRYFY FAIAI.TTATIONS Nuwber Street_ n.atiiig TP? Cat. Comments 567 05n4 1A Street C- d 56P n506 15 Street C d 559 0202 17 Street T) d 57n 02.21 17 Street n d 571 0326 17 Street n d 572. 0121 22 Street C d 573 n?M1 'fain Street C/1 d 574 n607 Clive Avenue n d 575 0200 Orange Avenue r d 576 0204 Orange Avenue P d 577 n414 Orange Aveiiue !?- d 57R 0418 nranbe Avenue r d 579 0304 Pacific roast A d Highway 5Rn n3n6 Pacific roast APA d Highway 5R 1 1.41.1 Palw Avenue n d 5R2 06n1 Pecan Avenue n d ,;R2 n60R Pecan Avenue n d 5R4 n912 Pecan Avenue T) d 5R5 0914 Pecan Avenue T) d 586 1009 Pecan Avenue n d 587 101.1 Pecan Avenue T) d (1101?) c R d 42R; Demolished SRR n426 1.1 trett ( • ) NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION 6 Criteria For Evaluation The following criteria are designed to guide the States, 50 years shall not be considered eligible for the National Federal agencies, and the Secretary of the Interior in Register.However,such properties will qualify if they are evaluating potential entries (other than areas of the Na- integral parts of districts that do meetthe criteria or if they tional Park System and National Historic Landmarks)for fall within the following categories: the National Register. A. a religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical The quality of significance in American history, architec, importance; or ture, archeology,and culture is present in districts, sites, B. a building or structure removed from its original loca- buildings,structures,and objectsthat possess integrity of tion but which is significant primarily for architectural location,design,setting,materials,workmanship,feeling, value,or which is the surviving structure most impor- and association, and: tantly associated with a historic person or event; or A. that are associated with events that have made a sig- C. a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstand- nificant contribution to the broad patterns of our his- ing importance if there is no other appropriate site or tory; or building directly associated with his productive life;or B. that are associated with the lives of persons significant D. a cemetery which derives its primary significance from in our past; or graves of persons of transcendent importance, from C. that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, age,from distinctive design features,or from associa- period,or method of construction orthat representthe tion with historic events; or work of a master,orthat posses high artistic values,or E. a reconstructed building when accurately executed in that represent a significant and distinguishable entity a suitable environment and presented in a dignified whose components may lack individual distinction;or manner as partof a restoration master plan,and when D. that have yielded,or maybe likely to yield,information no other building or structure with the same associa- important in prehistory or history. tion has survived; or Ordinarily cemeteries,birthplaces,or graves of historical F. a property primarily commemorative in intent if de- figures,properties owned by religious institutions or used sign.age,tradition,or symbolic value has invested it for religious purposes, structures that have been moved with its own historical significance; or from their original locations,reconstructed historic build- G. a property achieving significance within the past 50 ings,properties primarily commemorative in nature,and years if it is of exceptional importance. properties that have achieved significance within the past SAMPLE CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION OF LANDMARKS AND HISTORIC DISTRICTS SAMPLE CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION OF LANDMARKS AND HISTORIC DISTRICTS 1. Its character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of the city of Huntington Reach, state of California, or the United States. 2. Its location as a site of a significant historic event. 3. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the city of Huntington Reach. 4. Its exemplification of the cultural, economic, social, or histo- ric heritage of the city of Huntington Reach. 5. Its portrayal of the environment of a group of people in an era of history characterized by a distinctive architectural style. F. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architec- tural type or specimen. 7. Its identification as the work of an architect or master builder whose individual work has influenced the development of the city of.. Huntington Reach. R. Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, ma- terials, or craftsmanship that represent a significant architec- tural innovation. Q. Its relationship to other distinctive areas that are eligible for preservation according to a plan based on a historic, cultural, or architectural motif. 10. Its unique location or singular physical characteristic repre- senting an established and familiar visual of a neighborhood, community, or the city of Huntington Reach. CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING POTENTIAL MAIN STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT �. je Historic Resources Board .� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 January 26, 1989 Mayor Bannister & City Council 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO JOHNSON-HEUMANN HISTORIC SURVEY REVISION Dear Mayor Bannister and City Council Members: The Board is satisfied with the report in general although there are a few minor corrections or concerns. The only major change we recommend is that a graphic representation of the proposed districts, similar to the large one submitted be included in each copy of the survey report. We believe that this report is a more accurate assessment of the historic nature of the area and structures than the earlier report by 30th Street Architects. The ratings, in general, differ little from the first study, but place the relative merit of the subject districts/structures in a context consistent with recognized standards. However, we do wish to emphasize that the earlier report does still have merit as an assessment of the architectural quality of the individual structures and hope that it will continue to be utilized as a companion guide for case-by-case evaluations. We fully agree with Johnson-Heumann's recommendations for future action and urge their implementation at once. In order to expedite the implementation process, we offer the following suggestions: • Council reaffirm the former Council request that Johnson-Heumann be engaged to complete the historic survey of the original city and outlying historic areas and that this survey be completed as soon as possible. • Council direct planning staff to have an intern planner organize the early building records so they may be used in research. This is critical for evaluation of structures in the new survey area since many were moved from their original location in 1926-7. • Council direct PIO to provide photographic assistance ... film, photographers, development assistance ... when needed during the survey, and recommend that the PIO assist with graphic design of public information documents. • Council utilize the expertise of this board and community members to provide information and assistance with the survey and other related matters. r� January 26, 1989 Page 2 of 3 We have reviewed the recommendations of Johnson-Heumann in conjunction with those of 30th Street Architects and the Council directive of June 27, 1988, and believe the following priorities should be considered for the coming year's program. The first priority is the establishment of a landmark ordinance and a mechanism for identifying and protecting eligible structure and districts. We offer our assistance in working with Council and staff to develop an appropriate ordinance. • The second priority, to be accomplished in concert with the first, is to make the public aware of a potential landmark ordinance and the benefits of such action. This includes public information documents which display typical historical structures/districts and explain their purpose. It may also include other media presentations to alleviate citizen concerns. We believe that the PIO office could be most helpful in developing appropriate media, and would be happy to work with that staff. Because the historic area is in a state of change now, we believe some short-term measures must be instituted while permanent ones are planned. We suggest, therefore, the following interim measures: Create a list (Board and Council recommendations) of significant structures/districts which might be potentially eligible for landmark status. • Provide preliminary discretionary design guidelines to prolong the historic ambiance of the potential districts. • Encourage alternatives to demolition within those districts, and where retention is not feasible, require attention to compatible design and scale so that the new construction is compatible with the existing structures. • Develop and publicize an off-site relocation program for historic structures with provision for write down of loans and/or other related costs of acquisition. • Adopt a policy attitude to consider the impact of a project on the historic resources within an area early in the planning stage to prevent delays. • Publicize these interim policies In addition, we support the concepts included in the June 27, 1988 statement which propose rehabilitation of the demonstration block if they do retain historic elements as well as the continuation of plans for the 3DI concept historic square surrounding the post office. (1947d) January 26, 1989 Page 3 of 3 We also favor, in concept, relocation of a few outstanding residential structures to Bartlett Park. However, we recommend that a market study be made to guide staff in the best utilization of these rescued structures at that location. We believe a sound program for preservation of our historic resources can be implemented, but also believe the development and implementation will require a commitment from Council to make timely decisions and continue to support them during this critical period. Therefore, we urge Council to consider our suggestions in the helpful manner they are intended, and to enter into dialogue with us to establish a program and, ultimately a historic preservation policy which is mutually satisfactory. Sincerely, arbara Milkovich Chairman BM:REL:gbm (1947d) STA-F.OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES I yCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor OF`FI­:E OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION POST OFFICE BOX 942896 ,SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 94296-0001 G (916)445.8006 J J If May 13, 1988 RECEIVED Mr. Michael C. Adams Department of Community Development MAY 191988 City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street DEPARTMENT O� Huntington Beach CA 92648 COMMUNITY'DEVELOPMEi�T PLANNING DIVISION Dear Mike: I was glad to have had a chance to meet with you and members of your staff last week to discuss historic resources in Huntington Beach. We ran into two major questions. First, does Huntington Beach have a commercial district downtown that qualifies for the National Register of Historic Places? And if so, do the City's current procedures for assessing impacts on the district comply with environmental laws? The inventory of historic resources for the city, while providing much useful information, does not address the first question directly. The final report sometimes views a district as a historic resource and sometimes as a planning tool. For that reason the report offers conflicting judgments about the exact location of a commercial district and the buildings that contribute to it. I was anxious to get a first-hand view. After our meeting Diana Blaisure, Barbara Milkovich, and Guy Guzzardo gave me a tour of downtown. This was enlightening but still left unanswered questions. So I then went through the area more systematically by myself. locating contributors and drawing. tentative boundaries. I concluded that a Register-eligible district does exist downtown. The enclosed map (with attached explanation) provides more . details. That leaves the question of compliance. I talked with Hans Kreutzberg, head of our environmental unit, about the procedures that the City should follow. He stated that the i982 environmental impact report does not adequately deal with cultural resources because it does not incorporate information from the 086 survey. The City needs to take two additional steps immediately. First it must conduct an "initial study" of historic resources downtown. The study would follow up on the inventory and my analysis. Its main goal would be to determine the exact 2 boundaries of a historic district and to distinguish contributors from non-contributors. Because so much has been done already. very little additional work would be needed to complete this study. Then the City must prepare a "focused SIR" that specifically discusses how downtown plans will impact the historic district. After completing these steps, the City will be in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The City is also proposing to use federal funds to carry out some of its redevelopment plans. As a result, it will need to meet a requirement under Section tO6 of the National Historic Preservation Act that it identify historic resources and evaluate impacts before proceeding. The steps outlined will go most of the way to meeting that requirement. If you have questions about CEQA or Section 1O6, please address them directly to Dr. Kreutzberg. He is much more conversant than I with recent interpretations of these laws and is in a better position to give you advice. He can also outline our continuing responsibilities under Section 5024.6(.)) of the Public Resources Code. In the meantime please look over the enclosed map and the attachod explanation. I think I have all the addresses straight, but some of the lot lines may not be quite right. The boundaries and the status of each building are, of course, still tentative. From all I can tell, the City is in an excellent position to conserve and enhance this important historic resource as part of its efforts to develop an attractive commercial area downtown. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Orig-na= Donald S. Napoli, Coordinator State Historic Resources Inventory Enclosure cc:Barbara Milkovich Diana Blaisure ' Eric Nicoll Hans Kreutzberg . Lucinda Woodward STATE OF"CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION i POST OFFICE BOX 942896 SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 94296-Ml (916)"4 --8006 POTENTIAL NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT HUNTINGTON BEACH , CAL . = z ? �o 0 x � •*� 3v3• LL- • H 0 LI VE 225 ? 2Z!o b `2z2111153' •0• ii z2� • 22422 223 _ 22 zo O 218 ? 24�214 211 022 ?210 209 0 A210 201 O 206•204 — N Z05 • 201 a o Zv2 • WALNUT • Ito I21 0 • 126 • — 12 9 0128 t 151 ? 12.3 ?, a 124 119 •- • 12Z - I17 IZI• • 122 IIIf • 101 L PACIFIC COAST HWY. KEY a TENTATIVE DISTRICT BOUNDARIES 4 ® CONTRIBUTORS p O NON—CONTRIBUTORS c� 7 UNCERTAIN E Potential National Register District Huntington Beach, Cal. p• 2 General Comments. Huntington Beach appears to have a downtown commercial district that is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. A historic district--like a building, structure, object, and site--is a type of resource. Although its components may lack distinction when viewed individually, together they form a distinguishable entity that provides a visual link to the past. In general, a district is defined by its "3 Cs"--characteristics, confines, and contributors. To be eligible for the National Register, a district must meet specific standards set up by the federal government. These standards are not always obvious to those who have not worked with them. Characteristics. The district in downtown Huntington Beach represents commercial growth in the city from the turn of the century to 1938. It includes buildings from each decade, most of which were (and are) retail businesses. Confines: The boundaries of the district encompass those buildings that have the defining characteristics. Boundaries must be drawn carefully to include only those buildings. Usually there is a central core (Main Street in this case) and "stringers" going out in several directions. Here, for example, contiguous buildings continue on Walnut past Sixth Street. The boundaries on the attached map are still •tentative. On further analysis, they might be extended to include the pier, its small ancillary structures, and the building at 319 Pacific Coast Highway. The inclusion of 225 Fifth Street is another possibility . Contributors. The components of a district either contribute to its sense of time and place or they don't. The National Register allows for no middle option, such as "would be a contributor if restored." A building may contribute even if it does not retain all of its original appearance. It may be modified on the ground floor and unchanged above, or completely changed at a time later in the historic period. There is no unequivocal rule about how much of (or what elements of) the appearance from the historic period a building must retain for it to contribute. In the same way, the percentage of contributors needed varies from district to district, depending (among other things) on the intrusiveness of the .non-contributors. As a rule of thumb, two-thirds of the components of a district must contribute for the district to be eligible for the National Register. As shown on the attached map, contributors greatly outnumber non-contributors in the district. The judgments remain tentative, however. Each should be rechecked. The map -also shows several buildings designated by - a question mark. These (more than the others) need further analysis. STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES NCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor =71 - i. OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION � y CEPARTMEMfOF PARKS AND RECREATION atA�(a a� POST OFFICE BOX 942896 r Q J SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 94296-0001 (916)445-8006 Cj E I V E D April 8, 1988 APR 121988 Ms. Diana Teran Blaisure DEPARTMENT of Department of Community Development City of Huntington Beach COMMUNITY 2000 Main Street PLANNING DIVISION DEVELOPMENT Huntington Beach CA 92648 Dear Ms. Blaisure: Thank you for your letter of March 29 concerning the Huntington Beach historic resources inventory and the Clark Hotel, one of the properties in the inventory. In making an initial review of the inventory, I concluded that the crucial issue was whether the downtown contained a histor-i district eligible for listing in the National Register. That was why I asked you on January 7 to send map of the survey area. Such a map would provide more information about the district' s likely boundaries and contributors than could be obtained from the inventory forms alone. Even with the map I would be reluctant to comment on the ratings used in the inventory. We in the Office of Historic Preservation pretty much limit ourselves to applying National Register criteria. We generally try to avoid interpreting purely local standards. Further, neither the Clark Hotel nor any other old building downtown can appropriately be evaluated individually. until its place in a Register-eligible district is determined. On March 17 Kathryn Gualtieri, the State Historic Preservation Officer, wrote to your colleague Eric Nicoll about the use of federal funds in the downtown. She pointed out that federal regulations oblige the City to judge the impact that federally funded projects will have on historic resources. Before that judgment can be made, the City needs to identify those resources, including historic districts if present. Requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act are less rigorous. But the goal of the state law is much the same. Plans should not be completed without an evaluation of the impact of planned projects on historic resources. I am thus somewhat surprised to learn from Barbara Milkovich' s letter to Doug La Belle that the City has yet to make a "complete environmental assessment" although redevelopment activity is about to begin. All of which leads me to this: The City should stop everything downtown--not just the demolition of the Clark Hotel--and make some conclusions about a Register-eligible district. Does such a district exist? If so, where are the boundaries and what are the contributors? In drawing these conclusions, the City should use 2 National Register criteria exclusively. Local standards or current redevelopment plans should not influence judgments of National Register eligibility. As the SHPO' s letter indicated, Lucinda Woodward of our staff can provide more information about planning requirements connected to the use of federal funds. Of particular interest is the question of whether the destruction of the Clark Hotel (or any other downtown building) would constitute "anticipatory demolition" as defined under federal regulations. I don't know if I've answered the questions that prompted your letter. It seems that the City should be concerned with broader issues. These issues--involving a large number of historic properties--need to resolved soon if the City is to incorporate historic preservation into its efforts at downtown revitalization. Please let me know if I can provide additional information. Sincerely, Donald S. JNoli Historian cc: Eric Nicoll Barbara Milkovich Lucinda Woodward O i. Historic Resources Board CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH Post Office Box 190 Hun-ington Beach, California 92648 June 20, 1988 Mayor John Erskine 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: HISTORIC PRESERVATION WITHIN DOWNTOWN HUNTINGTON BEACH Dear John: Enclosed is our proposal for the documentation of historic districts within the city and a map whichh suggests the boundaries of the historic commercial district, a first priority in revitalizing downtown Huntington Beach. In the last few weeks, there has been a great deal of concern and confusion about the City's responsibilities to address historic issues in planning for redevelopment of the downtown. We, too, are perplexed by the difference in interpretation of the significance of structures between the findings of the initial survey and those of the state officer, Don Napoli. While we are inclined to rely on the advise of Mr. Napoli, we agree that it is appropriate to take time immediately to clarify a number of issues. Therefore, once again, we strongly recommend the hiring of a new outside consultant to review both the initial study and Mr. Napoli's suggestions. This consultant would be charged with interpreting and/or revising the rating scale for historically significant districts and structures within the city, with preparing nominations to the National Register of Historic Places for qualified areas and buildings and informing the board, staff and, ultimately, council of the financial and cultural advantages of acknowledging tangible historic resources within the City. Once these concerns have been addressed and the districts, where appropriate, have been designated, council can proceed confidently with the redevelopment and revitalization of the historic commercial core. Recognition of an historic area does not mean that buildings within it cannot be removed if necessary. it does mean that there may be additional financial incentives available for sensitive restoration of structures within the district. It does mean that the city can take advantage of a major cultural resource for educational and promotional activities to draw tourists and residents to the downtown. Finally, it means that council has another design option to utilize as it proceeds with its new village concept for the downtown. Page Two June 21, 1988 Historic Preservation Within Downtown Huntington Beach The members of the Board will be happy to assist in locating new consultants, and to review their findings for council. We will also be able to gather public input to the study as requested by the consultants when they begin to identify historic areas and structures. This is an opportunity to explore the history of our community and preserve its physical reminders. Let's take advantage of an unexpected turn of events to create a positive climate of understanding within our community. Sincerely, Barbara Milkovich Chairman, Historic Resources Board cc: City Council Planning Commission Paul Cook Doug La Belle Mike Adams Dan Brennan City Clerk BM:jr Attachments: 1. Proposal for Documentation of Historic Districts 2. Proposed Historic District (0819d-2) PROPOSAL FOR DOCUMENTATION OF HISTORIC DISTRICTS FOR INCLUSION IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES WHAT: o Hire outside consultant with experienced architectural historians and historians on staff to: Review initial survey and subsequent information; Establish exact boundaries for historic districts identified by the historic survey in 1986; Submit nominations to the National Register; Provide public information on the advantages of identifying historic districts and structures. WHERE: o Study to cover area of initial survey. Priority to be given to commercial core. WHEN: o Effort to locate consultant to begin immediately and study be completed as soon as practical. ANTICIPATED RESULTS: o Continuation of effort begun in initial survey. o Development of important cultural resource within the community to attract tourists. o Clear understanding of and establishment of rating scale for future evaluation of historic districts and structures. o Addition of historic design options. o . Availability of new financial resources for revitalization of redevelopment areas. o Compliance with CEQA and National Historic Preservation Act. COST: o To be determined when scope of study is identified. (0819d-3) z 3 j 3o i I ��� 30.�• fff7 � ��- 2-1 i i � t e '`�`�" t �►3 c7' 0 3 18 u7T o ti 1 C ty of Huntington Beach g ��;� , >r • 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 DEPARTMENT OF COM#AUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536-5241 Housing/Redevelopment Division 536-5542 Planning Division 536-5271 May 27, 1988 Office of Historic Preservation Department of Parks and Recreation Post Office Box 942896 Sacramento, California 94296-0001 Attu: Donald S. Napoli, Coordinator State Historic Resources Inventory 'Dear Mr. Napoli: Your letter of May 13, 1988 again raises issues and concerns about the City's Downtown Redevelopment effort and compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. I `eel there is still a misunderstanding as to what the Redevelopment Agency is planning and what procedures are being followed. The City's Department of Community Development completes an environmental analysis o" each development project proposed within the "Downtown Specific Plan" area (the area reviewed in the 1982 Environmental Impact Report). The purpose of this additional environmental review is to incorporate any new information which has become available since the original E.I.R. certification or any increase in intensity an individual development project may be proposing over the original analysis. With regard to_potential historic structures in the downtown area identified in the "Historic Resources Survey Report", the City will require that each building listed will warrant additional environmental review and that a thirty (30) day hold will be placed on any demolition permits for those buildings in order for the Historical Society and the Historic Resources Board to have an opportunity for that review. In addition, all structures with an "A, B, or C" rating, or identified as being within the potential Main Street Historic District, will nr.-quire an "Environmental Assessment" to determine any -potential signfican+ environmental effects, or historical or architectural significance, prior to issuance of a huilding or'demolition permit. The assessment identifies potential adverse environmental. impacts and is used to determine whether any further action, such as a Negative Declaration, mitigated Negative Declaration or focused Environmental Impact Report will be necessary. Your statement that the City needs to take two additional steps immediately implies that our present procedures are inadequate. However, there is no need for a "focused E.I.R." until projects are proposed which will impact potentially historic structures, prior to the issuance of any entitlement for development the appropriate environmental review will be completed. The City's original E.I.R. did not review an overall Redevelopment Master Plan, but simply the enabeling zoning document (The Downtown Specific Plan); therefore, an additional environmental review on a project by project basis is the more complete approach. -May 24, 1988 �•,,=Wage Two Your statement that the City must conduct an "initial study" of historic resources --.downtown seems some what presumptuous. The City has performed this task with the "Historic Resources Survey Report".-\If it is your Office's official position that the potential downtown historic district boundaries be changed, then that information should be included as part of a formal review of the overall document. Your inclusion and omission of structures within the potential downtown historic district boundary seems to be generally lacking in justification and may appear some what arbitrary. The City Council and Redevelopment Agency have expressed a desire to combine old and new areas as part of an overall downtown commercial revitalization effort. In order to achieve this goal, a great deal of cooperation, negotiation, and compromise will be necessary from all effected parties. Thank you for your comments. Sincerely, Mike A ams, Planning Director MA:ss (0652d) bl$ r. 4 a 0 op 0 r y� r k� e `�i�' �. ����rL i�J.�w �a C ' C -F Till rtr, Lux I m A Ju •5���`�`� 1. •. r , .L : r a Y. t.1112 P, �-5P-11f, 1 fiw'S -l+ {�ri• : �ll1a `YI rn Y WELCOME.TO HUNTINGTON BEACH� • •'�;r� w'ay�y 1. i �1 �ti1�JJ��tfrt .Iti �� �:i�,•rr j .�K.L au •� � L a y�' •;�� ti:} r' �`{'�if^ 'ti,�l �� •1-Ilirr �7`;r ti� �t t�+�1�". :ti ,.,Y,• l IIjFI� °� � ���`••1 Y � � 1� rl �� rr \ 1 � •ram F1���°�+rr., 4:� '.r,1 �1 1• •�•.• 1�:�� Y�r;i A'.!�r `.• .i.:' ••�rl h J i l� .1 11•: r �'.�1 �:• l 1 t 7:•� .d 001. 70:% ' 1 , vt ca �1 2 '. ST - .n -- • - LAKE 1ff���177 J till -111. it"1 ' 1 1It 1 1/] I -i 1-I-1 11 I- I...1 1 i1 ---Inl _ IF -ic7r --'L—�t�[I_(�►--J'1 �4----1 =1 -� 1 7[-71C__ Fz:-` © El i. Historic Resources Board, CITY. OF .HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINQTONBEACH Post Office Box 190 .. Huntington Beach, Californ.ia..92648 May 4, 1988 Hon. John Erskine City of Huntington Beach ; ,000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ;subject: fiistc>ri.c City Walking 'four May 7 , 1988 Dear Mayor Erskine and Council , Members of the Board are delighted to have the opportunity to i.n `t.roduce you to the historical city of Huntington Beach this coming Saturday, May .7 , 1988. .,.The tour will began in the original Baptist Church, 61h and Or- ange, at 10 : 00am. Parking is available in the old civic center or along. the .street. We plan to walk. the area indicated on the en- closed map at a leisurely pace, stopping at the Helme Worthy Com- plex for a coffee .break. If you should get tired, a city .van will follow us for your- convenience. Please wear casual clothes and good walking shoes.. .. . and bring your imagination as well as your camera;. On our tour we will. trace the evolution of the city through its archA Lecture. Some words of warning—don't expect to find dupli- cates of 'the Queen Anne Victorian Newland House. The: city is younger, and, by the time it was founded, the Victorian architec- ture. was out of style. Also, don't expect to see all. restored buildings as you might on a traditional home tour. Many of the structures we will pass have seen better days and look it. But most can be: .restored to- their original attractiveness with. a bit of knowledge and a lot of elbow grease. jmaain� what they .must have :Looked .like when the little city was booming.' . In the course of the tour you will move through the boom periods of the city and the range of early twentieth century architecture . You will see beach cottages, fine craftsman .bungalows, western false fronts and art deco buildings as well as some classic Mediterranean designs . Structures were built simply and quickly to serve a rapidly growing population during each boom time. That these specimens have survived is testimony to the skill of their craftsman. The first boom period. ( 1901-1904) is represented by the Helene-Wor- ' thy House and commercial buildings, 6th and Walnut, when people were Just coming into the area and needed homes and furnishings immediately. The next boom ( 1904-09) followed closely when the town of Huntington Leach began- and the Methodist Resort Association moved its camp to the city. This campground drew the. interest of reli- gious families who built churches like the one at fth and Orange. After that the urban city developed (1909-1920) and substantial U homes similar to the Shank House, 5jih and. Walnut, were built. Many of these were originally along PCH, but, like the Shank, were moved away from the oil field there. The f i.nal boom period represented in the tour is the oil era ( 1920-1936) . Many of the commercial building along Main Street , including the Standard Market, Walnut and Main, the Clark Hotel , Olive and Main, and the Yost Office, also at Olive and Main, date from this exciting time. By the time we reach the final stop on our tour, the restored beach cottage at 41.1 6th St. , you will have seen .but a sample of the architectural history in our city. . There is more. Each quiet tree lined block yields another element of our past. We hope that the walk today will sensitize you to these elements which create the unique .history of Huntington Beach, and help you understand why wri are concerned that they.not be lost altogether nor their ambiance be compromised unnecessarily. Bost.. wishes f or a grand tour. Sincerely, Barbara Milkovich, Chairman Historic Resources Board Schedule for the Day May 7 1988 Historic City Walking Tour 10 : 00 am Meet at the original Baptist Church, 61h and Orange U Vistas: The original residential neighborhood Helme-Worthy Complex, Susan Worthy, hostess (coffee break) Shank House Original commercial core Glark Hotel . . .Standard Market . . .Old Jail Home 'four: 41.1 6th 3t. , Loretta Wolfe, hostess (coffee break 1: : 00 noon Tour completed Don t Forget: c,asuat clothes (you may want a jacket) . comfortable shoes camera and film notebook/sketch book/pen curiosity and an open mind IMAGINATION L ,., Ir ■MON unable na .same e■■Iir h � ■ ■ • ■ moment a M■mm r. ■ a s ■ ■wr�� • . '■ ■ ■full■ f ` a f ■ • ■a■rl ■ ■ ■ m wsa w News ■ a w a a m■ i {: ■ ■ ■ ■ w ■ m ■ ■ ■ ■ w ■ w■rumm a. ■ ■ f i in ■ a smwO■S ■ ar■r a ■ ■ m ■ a ■ . ■ IMMUNE R� :_■s ■ ■ s ■ r` ■ ■ • ■ate awlw. f ■ ■ ■ . ■ : r wwoow ,KS u va ...■■� . 1 r . ■ ■ ■a■... �y {ti Ijr ■ ■ ■us s � • �. ■ ■ as■ o.a,il a p ■ ■ • are ■ ■ dam No ell ■ s ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ s ■ m da 1? ■ . a ■ ■ ■ us a. a a ■ a a a s U. s • ■ liar r r • � � see ■ s ■ a a Ov ■ ■ . ■ memo ■ ■ ■ w Vim ■ ass ■ ■ ■ a • s ' was s ■ f 1u ■ s s ■ r a ■ a . ■ a ■ ■ ■ ■ mass • w man soon ■ s ■ s >. o ■ s ama 1 ■ s mar. ■ ■ r, ■ - r s ■ ■ rw ■ ■ s e ■ r ■ f � ■ ■ r NU ■ ■memo nounwas = a s. i ■ wry taws s ■ . s fn� ■ a same was a s f a ■ maw ass al a ■ a M ■ ■ ■ ■ ! a ■ M ■ ■ ■ ■ ai-: .■ ■ w r a ■ • ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ a ■ a .n. ■ ■ ■ a a ■ ■ s r ■ . a ■ s ■ a a ■ ■ ■ a s r ■ ■ r ■ � ■ s ■ r � ■ • w ■ ■ ■ ■ j Owl 1 + a ■ a ■ _ ■ m a w w a ■ a a a s ■ r ■ • ■ L 000. 06*0 (sO*Sep@00.W State of California_The Resources Agency Set.,No. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND.RECREATION NABS WAER NA SHL LoC UTMi A ._ ; B HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY C: D IDENTIFICATION 1: : Common name: HELME-WORTHY STORE 2. Historic name: HEMP HOUSE FiIRNTSNTNr COMPANY 3. Street or rural address: 513-19 Walnut Strppt City Huntington Beach CA Zips 9264R County,Oranee 4. Parcel number: az 4 I5I-O r 5• Present Owner: Shirley D. Worthy . Address: Rni 7 3th St_ Huntington Beach CA 92648 X City Zip _,�_Ownership is:Public Private 6; Present Use: Store/beauty salon/dance. stu home furnishings sales �inal use: DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: .. Western Falsefront . 7b. Briefly describe the present phyWcal derawiptlon of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from:its origii ' -rendition:. Constructed in .1904, the Helene House •Furnishing Company building is the only pre 1910 -commercial building .in Huntington Beach 'to •retain ..its original integrity.. It retains its original facade, windows, transoms, and most of the original doors. Clad in narrow clapboards, the building is capped by a wooden cornice, accented with closely- set. brackets. Four matching double-hung windows, trimmed with wide boards, are spaced evenly across the front facade at the second floor level. A plain beltcourse rims above the unusually large wood mullioned transom windows. The centered stairway entrance leads to the second floor apartments, .and, is •flanked. •by. two identical storefront spaces. The symmetry is further emphasized by the matching first floor bays. Each is centered . with a single door,. featuring a. single large pane of.-glass. Plain wood panels cover the spaces below the plate glass windows.`. '-Xour small taindows and one door are located on the on the south .(alley) side.- An enclosed two-story porch and a variety of wood- framed windows.. occupy the rear. . The north..side features a lean-to syle addition with a man ufactured. stone false front. The original door and a large window face the street. The house Aritmediately to the. north. and the-two-story garage to the west are also part of the property. . The house is -liste.d on the..,survey as."128 Sixth Street, and the garage Z. was built in thp. 40'R. Tt h- loor. 8: Construction date: Estimated- Factual 1904 9. Architect Unknown 10. .Builder M. A. Helene 11: Approx.Pry�ty sine (in feet) Frontage. 1_l�.•5' Oepth 100' orapprox. acreage ! .12. Date(s)of enclosed photographs) Ausust 1986. - l 13. Condition: Excellent X.Good 'air Deteriorated No longer in snce 14. Alterations: center doors 15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) Open land _Scattered buildings Densely built-up ..Residential —_Industrial Commercial Other: Mixed residential and eommereial 16. Threats to site: None known_._.Private development Zoning Vandalism Public Works project Other: Redevelopment 17, .Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown? 18. Related features: residence next door and garage belong tothe same property SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) L j Matthew Helme, a member of Huntington Beach's first._Board. of Trustees and its fourth Mayor, moved to Huntington Beach in 1903, after purchasing this property. He began his business, the Helme House Furnishing,.Company, in. 1904, after constructed this building. This is the last Western Falsefront building in south and central Orange County. Mr. Helms contributed much �to thol arliest settlement period of the town. He fought for incorporation, was elected to 'the town's first Board of Trustees. He worked to get the water system functioning as a.city, .0#1ty, helped set up a then- modern fire department, helped set up the city manager system which is still in exist- ance today, authored an ordinance to get the city's first gas bonds approved, and introduced a substantial street lighting and paving program. In the elections of 1912 and 1916, he received the highest number of votes of any candidate. . On April 19, 1916, he was elected Mayor by a unanimous vote of his fellow.Trustees. The Huntington Beach News reported," the tribute is a fitting one for Trustee Helme, as he has been a mem- ber of the board since the city was incorporated and at the election of April 19 re- ceived the highest- votes cast for any candidate for Trustee. He was accorned the same honor in the election four years ago, which gives him a standing in the community that: any citizen might be elated over." •:�,�\\y Ufa J� �o��J 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is checked, number in order of imp ortance.) Architecture 1 Arts&Leisure �'� �� „b♦f �$ Economic/Industrial —.Exploration/Settlement 1` Government 3 Military Religion Social/Education 21. Sources(List books,documents,surveys,personal interviews and their dates). 22. Date form prepared Aug. 1986 By (name) D. Marshyam+ Organization Thirtieth Street Architects. Address: d821 NEUPsRr OLV�, __ City __ MH.Lftlar gF-eem r7A Zip %443 Phone: 'h J 4 A-13-J1 q 3 �' � , 'State of California—The Resources,_ .ay" Ser..,Jo. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HABS H.AER NR - SHL Loc t UTM A I3 t HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY C D 'IDENTIFICATION 'Christian .Science Reading Room . _ 1.. Common name. 2. . Historic name: Clark. Hotel 3. .Street or rural address: 228 Main Street Huntington Beach 92648 Orange City nn zip' County 4. Parcel num2e 4-148-01 y Sylvia `Shandrick 228 1/2 Main St. 5.' Present Owner: Address: city Huntington, Beach Zip 92648' Ownershtpts Public Private X Reading' room & hotel. Hotel 6. Present User Original use: DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: Nep—Classical Camexcia1 7b. Briefly describe thepresent physical description of the site or structure and describe any maior alterations from its origii- ' enndition: Tan ruffled brick, conbibed with white glazed brick, .covers the exterior of this two-story building, located: on the corner of Olive and Main. A glazed brick cornice, crowns the unbroken parapet. Pairs of redessed . double-hung wood windows are located. along the front .-and dast sides of ' the second floor. A belt-course. of glazed brick runs below the windows . All pilasters are accented with cahite brick.. A. large .plate glass display . window; :trimmed - in wood, occupies frost of .the Main St. storefront. The ' .window sill is faced- with white brick. Double wood-and-glass doors , with a narrow transom above,: lead to the interior of the first floor store. A modern metal-and-glass door-,. which replaces. the original, leads .to the- i second floor: A large frosted. &Uss transom`with a mullioned border of j lights the area: above the door. 'Another large display window fronts . on Olive. . .The transom is covered by' a large sign. A singlalwood-and-glass door recessed, near the middle of the building has its transom covered with wood. Another original storefront,. consisting of. a single .wood and glass door, flanked by plate glass '`windows, is located near the rear of the �.a. construction date: _ Estimated 1925 Factual 9. Architect ! to.; Builder �. 11. . Approx.Property size •(in feet) � Frontage y3 Depth 11.E. 5 orapproz. ecresge 12. Date(s)of photographs) 1a�� 3. Condition: Excellent .Good X �. Deteriorated No longer in exis e . 4. Alterations: Signs cover transoms. ' Door. to second floor.. 5. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary Open land ^Scatter.ed huildings _. Densely built-up , Residential Industrial Commercial Othee: 6. Threats to site:• None known_Private d to men. toning Vandalism ; Public Works project Other: e8everment 7. Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unkno'WO j 8. Related features: None IGNIF ICANCE 9. . Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (Include°dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) The tan and white brickwork of the Clark Hotel present a fine example of a Neo-classical brick commercial building. There are ,few alterations to the exterior. Built as a hotel for .oil' workers in .1925, the 'builidng , is the finest remaining historic Main 'Street Hotel. For the last several years the Christian Science Reading. Room has occupied the downstairs storefront. ). Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is F checked, number in order of importance.) .� sosa Architecture 2 Arts& Leisure � 4 Economic/Industrial ._ Exploration/Settlement �_ I soer SO4. c.. Government Military .� Religion Social/Education ,�. 417 sie I. Sources(List books,documents,surveys,personal interviews s11 and their dates). GJ� 1 O ��" 4 24 01 410 t. 2 JR6 Date form prepared By (name) D.Marsh '1s Organization Address.2�821 New � 92663 cif C714 673c� Phone - 643 zip Historical Researchers: ,�• �, Barbara Melkovitch ' -q Jerry Person. L� 228 Main Street.. , 7b. Physical Description (Cont. ) - east side. Double wooden doors; a single wood-and-glass door, and a plate glass window define the shop at the rear corner. A wire glass door with wide transom above, is ' located next to the corner. The rear of the. building is of painted red brick.. Three double-hung windows, recessed u-in arched brick frames look out from the second story. Two five-panel ` doors, with transoms above, are located below. f, i f - I I i i • 1 YI State of California-The Resource ncy Vo. 'DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND R£, ATION HABS HAER wR SHL hoc UTM: A B _ HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY C D )ENTIFICATION 1. ' Common name: 2. Historic name:.Huntington B� cjh_Mugc C,,p . 3. Street or rural address: .217 Main Street Cityy Huntington Beach zip 92648 County Orange T. 4. Parcel number: 024-147-14 . .5. Present Owner: DOuglas.'Langevin Address: city Huntiington Beach Zip ,_Ownership is: Public Private Y 6. . Present Use: Bible Study Center original use: DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: Western Falsefront 7b.. Briefly describe the present physlcai description of the site.'or structure and describe any major alterations from its origin. enndition: The single-storied falsefront building shown below has a gabled roof behind a stucco-clad front facade with an unbroken parapet, The-gable roofed building attached to the back of the falsefront is clad in board and batten. The parapet face' on the front is plain stucco. A centered recessed entry features diagonally placed plate glass windows. leading to a single wood and glass door. Vertical-paned transoms run above the store ,windows and door; and were probably installed in the 20's. Large plate glass windows framed in wood, flank the entry: The narrow bulkheads are clad in wood paneling. The east side of the building borders a vacant lot and. the board and batten siding: can be seen Doublq .hung windows, a paneled door, and a small shed can be seen along th&' back. Construction date: Estimated Factual } i ... I b Architect ,. Builder L? I 1. Approx.property size On feet) Fron .cage 25�' Depth 117 5 IiI13L1. or approx. acreage tiIlD I ' 2. Dates)of enclosed photographs) i � 3jR6 tt DhA I: . 3 . 13. Condition: Excellent .__Good _ . Fair Deteriorated No longer i.. _ .istence 14. Alterations: StUCCo front, shed bathroom 15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) Open land i Scattered buildings _ Densely built-up , X Residential Industrial Commercial X Other: 16. Threats to site: None known__._Private development_ Zoning - Vandalism Public Works project Other: Redevelopment area i 17. Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown? 1 IL Related features: None SIGNIFICANCE 19. +Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) Shown on the 1909 Sanborn Map, this western falsefront building still retains its board-and-batten siding. A contributor to the early exploration-settlement phase of Huntington Beach' s Development, the front of ,the building was altered during. .the slant drilling oil boom. The Huntington Beach Music Co. was here in the early 20' s . By 1927 Ed's Restaurant had moved in. B.T. Mollica (shoe store) and Bate's Electric Shop were two other tenants here during the. 20' s.'' This building is one of the earliest in downtown Huntington Beach. I l(81 • ,�� .c.a. �� �Ros�,�.e.�c.� � �-tt, r.�iY �D,u/�u,.`ee.�� �_D k-�-�Q, .! S22 j 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is r� v oft '9L checked,number in order of importance.) , Soae Architecture Arts& Leisure "fib Economic/Industrial ..� Exploration/Settlement �a J 504F so Government Military �1�� h101% uAlga Religion Social/Education err K` a 417 128 v 21. Sources(List books.documents,surveys.personal interviews '` ail 4 2+ ' and their dates). , 01 410 22.' Date form prepared By (name) D. Marsh re Organisation Thirtieth Street Archi=ts Address: 2821 B144d. city ort Beach Zia Phone; (/1 5"-6TI Historical Researchers Barbara McMovitch Jerry Person `F gists of California-The.Resources W 'o, . OEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND ROdficATION, HAGS HAER NR SHL Loc UTM: A B HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY C D IDENTIFICATION 1. Common name. Red'And-White Market i 2. Historic name: Princess The tg„re 3. Street or rural address:. 207 Main Street: City Huntington Beach zlp 26 8[ .. County Orange 4. Parcel number: 024-147-24 i,.. 6. Present Orvnei: Calvin Furman Addiess• l-730 Hwy 111 City Indio: zip: 9 2 0 pamership is:Public`�, Private X 6. Present Use: -Beach Mgrchandise Original use: '.Theatre' DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: Early Commercial - .probably 20.`.s remodel . 7b. . Briefly describe the present physics/description of the site er structureimid describe any major alterations from its . origin enndition: . This It story commercial building. is: clad in stucco with a shed style roof of red .clay tile across the. top: A large single-paned plate glass window, -framed in rough vood 'and sheltered by an awning, is centered in the second. floor facade. Large plate glass windows, with '30' s metal trim, flank the centered,. recessed entry. Modern double doors . wi.th metal frames lead into the store The original wood-framed transom is- located at the front'.of 'the 'entry and is flush with the 'storefronts.. . This indicates that the original entry doors -were not recessed. New brick. covers- the bulkheads.. The sides of -the building are clad in.corrugated-metal sheets . The back is clad in stucco. A pair of double-hung. windows , fronted with iron bars is located on the second story. The first floor doors have been replaced with modern ones . Much of the:. 20' s -integrity is retdined ' in this building. tip s. Constructio Estimated Factual_ Owner 9. Architect v.. BuilderOwner 11. Approx.prbpw y size tin feet) Frontage _ Depth_11.Z...5.' or approx. acreage 12. Date(s)of enclosed photograph(s) 1 L _ 10/85- D 13. Condition: Excellent ._Good Fair Deteriorated No longer in itence ta. Alterations: New brick on bulkheads 15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) Open land _Scattered buildings Densely built-up X Residential Industrial Commercial X Other: 16. . Threats to site: None known_Private development Zoning Vandalism Pk blic Works project Other: Redevelogment 17. Is the structure: On its original site?..X Moved? Unknown?" 18. Related features: . Nnn SIGNIFICANCE 19. . Oriefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) The Princess Theatre, the first theatre in Huntington Beach was located here during the early 20' s. J.. Cleve Scott, who later built the Scott Theatre on Fifth Street and E.E. French were the proprietors. The Red and White Market, owned by Marcus "Howard was a prominent occupant/ owner in the building for several years during" the 20' s and 30' s. This building is significant as the first theatre in town and for playing an important role during the 20' s ;and 30' s, the era of oil prosperity when Main Street played host to droves of.. oil .workers. i i 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is , Sae checked,number in order of importaince.) Architecture 3 Arts& Leisure 1 `�� 504F S Economic/Industrial ._ Exploration/Settlement 2 ? '�gi 'C 420 AAA Government Military ✓�� ,ie y Religion Social/Education . 417 42e 411 424 21. Sources (List books,documents,surveys,personal interviewst and their dates). O of 410 22. Date form prepared 2/86" �fP 8y (name) D.-Marsh Organization Thirtieth Street Architects Address: 2821 Newport Blvd. City Zip Phone b/J— Historical Researchers: Barbara Milkovitch '9L Jerry Person State of California—The Resource incy No, DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RE. _ATfON HAGS- HAER NR SHL Loc UTM: A g HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY C D .JENTIFICATION Standard Market I. Common name: 2. Historic name- Standard Market . 3. Street or rural address: 126 Main Street city Huntington. Beach Zip.92648 County.Orange 4. Parcel number: 024-154-01 u Jaddun Naber 126 Main St. `S. Present Owner: Address: City Huntington Beach Zip 92648 Ownership is: Public Private X s. Present Use: Market Open -air Market Original,use:.' DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: Zigzag Moderne. 7b. . Briefly describe the present phy ca/description of the sit*or structure and"describe any major alterations from its Origin .' -nndition: ; :Designed in the .Zigzag Moderne .style, the large two-story, stucco-clad building known as the Standard Market.,.pccupies the corner of Main and ."Walnut. The flat roof is faced on twotsides 'with `a parapet accented with projecting pilasters with flaked tops. A plain stucco band placed 2' below the top unites the pilasters horizontally. The unusual windows along the second floor form a distinctive Moderne pattern. Cutouts in :a stepped design crown each single-paned horizontal window. The pilasters which divide the windotwls reach down to the plain stucco beltcourse which .runs across the top of the storefront. Originally built with an open front, protected by iron gates , the first storefront has been infilled with diagonal wood siding multi-paned vertical windows , and red ceramic. tile-clad bulkheads. A shed-style roof and brick wall occupy the first floor of the west end of the building. The Walnut side (east) features three sections of pilasters which have been infilled with stucco panels and some transoms which have been covered over. The .main attractibn. is the row of zigzag parapeted S. Construction date: 1933 Estimated;,.__ Factual 9. Architect unknown 10. Builder unknown i Approx.prowy si=e (in feet} —_ Frontage Depth 117 . Of approx: sweage 12. Date(s)of enclosed photograph Is) L - - sue- 13. Condition: Excellent __Good _Fair _ Deteriorated No longer in existence _ 14. Alterations: Waod infill. on sides and front facades shed-style canopy , aluminum windows in back 15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessarl) Open land Scattered buildings _ Densely built-up . Residential Industrial Commercial Other: 16. Threats to site: None known_Private develo ment Zoning Vandalism Public Works.proiect Other: Red�eveop�ment 17. Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown? 18. Related features: None SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and/or"architectural importance (include dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) When this stylish Zigzag Moderne market was built in 1933, it was open across the front with iron gates to provide protection at night. A good example of the Zigzag Moderne style, the building retains much _ of its original integrity. The DeBrittons owned .and operated a market in three buildings on this property as early as 19.26 and called it the Standard Market. When Bob DeBritton built this large two-story building in 1933, he had it designed in the latest style. A new era of prosperity came to Huntington Beach in 1932 when the latest slant drilling methods were first employed. The- Moderne and .stucco j buildings in the commercial a>±ea. are evidence: of—that, prosperity and the resurgence of Huntingto>;t Beach. i I . Locational sketch map(draw and label site and surrounding streets,roads,and prominent landmarks): 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is NORTH checked,number .)order'of importance Architecture Arts& Leisure Economic/Industrial _ Exploration/Settlement _],__ Government Military Religion Social/Education 21. . Sources (List books,documents,surveys, personal interviews and their dates). f 2/86 . : 22. Date form prepar09. By (name) E` P Organizatio bixtleffi St7reeteC s•Inc. �� !f Address: ZLIZI City BUMZip Phone: Historical Researchers: Barbara Melkovitchi' Jerry Person 126 Main Street 7b. Physical Description (Cont..) second-floor windows which -match those along the front. The rear elevation is clad in painted brick with a row of recessed aluminum second floor windows and a trio of first floor single doors. State of California.—The Reir Agency ,er. No. OEPARTMENT OF PARKS ANL .:REATION NABS fiAER NR SHL Loc UTM' A B HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY, C D. IDENTIFICATION Olson Building 1. Common name: 2. Historic name: Olson Building 3. Street or rural address: 115 .Main Street Huntington Beach 92648 Orange Cit�t Zip County 4. Parcel number: AP 24-153-08 i Homer Watkins 34832 Calle Fortuna 5. Present Owner: i` '= Address: City Capistrano Beach zip 92�_Ownership is: Public Private X 6... Present Use: Vacant. Original use: Department Store DESCRIPTION 7a. :Architectural style:Neo-Classical Brick Commercial Building 7b. Briefly describe the present physical descriptlM of the site or•struciure and describe any major alterations from its origin 'enndition: . i Dentil trim borders the brick cornice of this two-story Neo-Classical brick commercial building. The entire front facade is clad in white glazed brick. - A horizontal recessed panel, also of white glazed brick, accents the areaabove the two.:windows sets. The name ''Olson 1916" is inscribed on a terra costa sign in the center of the recessed panel. The recessed windows below have plain plate glass windows in the center and multi-paned side lights . The window sill also serves as a.beltcourse. The . transom and first floor storefront are currently covered with,a board fence and awning. The rear of the building is clad in stucco. and .contains two original arched double- hung windows with lug sills in the- second floor.. The first floor features arched. windows on both sides of the arched doorway. All are topped with radiating arched brick lintels. A staircase in the west leads to the second floor. 8. Construction date: Estimated - Factual 1916 9. Architect Owner q. • i i 10. Builder Owner I 1 • t ' ' •rrrr irpiurtJ '�. ' '11. Approx.Q y size (in feet] Frontsgs 4J Depth 117 . 5 ' or approx. acreage j 1�. Date(s)of enclosed photograph(s) 10/85 1 11'' 1'It ft ' -77 13. Condition: Excellent ._Good X Fair Deteriorated No longer inexistence i 14. Alterations: New rear skylight. 15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) Open land Scattered buildings Densely built-up Residential Industrial Commercial 1XC Other: 16. Threats to site: None known_Private devglopmept zoning . Vandalism PUblic Works project Other: Re eyellopment area 17. Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown? 18. Related features: None SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) >> The original glazed brick facade of the Olson building forms an important link: among the buildings along the first block 'bf Main Street. As Huntington Beach' s leading department store during the Teens and Twenties, the business was known for its personal service to' customers and quality merchandise. Farwell' s Flower Shop, still in business in -the city, occupied the building in 1932 . Robertson' s Men' s Store, under the ownership of Jack Robertson, moved in in 1939. The building is. a significant component of Huntington Beach' s main commercial area because of its white glazed brick facade and its importance as a major store in 'the city. 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is checked,numbe2in order of importance,) ham+ �ru Architecture Arts$& Leisure Economic/industrial T.Exploration/Settlement Government Military .('r Religion Social/Education �� j �I$ ter• 21. Sources (List books,documents,surveys, personal interviews and their dates). ti Sanborn map 1922-30 ' ► r,,, 12. Date form prepared 2186 ` By (name) D. Marsh Organization '' " �.� s � Address: 2821 N wort Blvd. !(• �p y `1� City N�ort Leggh Zip 2�61 Phone.. 014) 673- 6 �O - y � Historical Researchers: A� Barbara Melkovitch , Jerry Person State of California—The Resourct ncy Vo. DEPARTMENT OF-PARKS ANDREt.--_ATION HAGS HAER NR SHL. Loc UTM: A B HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY C. D IDENTIFICATION 1" Common name: 2. Historic name: Shank Residence 3. Streetot rural address: 204 5th Street Cit%Huntington Beach Zip 92648 County Orange < 4. Parcel number: 024-147-08 n Susan Wullner & Ed 0 erron 355 Vista Biscae= J 5. Present Owner: p Address: Y City Newport Beach Zip 92660 Ownership is: Public Private X 6.. Present Use: Multi-family Residence Original use: Residence DESCRIPTION 7a: Architectural style: Craftsman Bungalow 7b. Briefly describe the present physical description of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its origin ' -nndition: The large two-storied, wood-shingle-sided Craftsman shown below is topped by low-pitched multiple gabled roofs . It has elements of both the Swiss and Japanese architectural styles . Exposed rafter tails at the eaves and triangular braces at the .corners and peak of the gable accent the work. The vent work, which covers all of each gable face , is constructed of wide vertical arrow-shaped cut outs . Two offset gables face front along the second story and the porch gables face front over the entrance and to the west side. The plain lintels of the windows extend well beyond the side trim. The of 6-over-1 double-hung windows face out from the second story: . A trio of casement windows , underscored with a window box,. supported by exposed beam ends , is Swiss in flavor. 'On the first floor, a pair of french windows is centered next to the porch. Shingle-clad columns-, with large wood caps , support the large porch. The unique Japanese.-style railing is original and is matched by ; a second floor porch railing in" the rear;, . A plate .glass window, flanked with double-hung windows , looks out onto the porch. The wide front door, 8. Construction date: i Estimated Factual 1 q 9. Architect U r i 10. Builder Ll It-ti N' t t « I 11. Approx.property size (in feet) Frontage 50 Depth or approx. acreage 12. DateW of enclosed photograph(s) Mamma 204 5th Street 7h. Phvsical Description (Cont. ) accented with vertical beveled glass windows, is flanked by leaded glass sidelights . The south side is dominated by a two-story chimney constructed of manufactured blocks the size of regular brick. A pair of horizontal 10-light windows flanks the fireplace. The wide lintels and 6-over-1 casement windows and window box used. in the front are repeated on the west side also. The flared shingle-clad wainscotting has been replaced by vertical coarsing wainscotting. A row of three 6-over-1 windows occupy both the first and second story of the wing which runs clear across the back of the house. A trio of stained glass windows , set high in the, wall, face south from the back of this wing. Another wing, added to the rear, has a flat-roofed porch which has an added lean-to constructed against the house. The east side if the house features a cantilevered bay, midway between the first and second story with multi-paned windows denotingg the location of the staircase. The interior of this large house still retains its fine woodwork, fireplace, . brass hardware, . hardwood floors amd boxed .beam ceilings. It is now used as a rooming house. I State of California—The Resour .gency —,ar. No. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION NABS HAER NR SHL Loc UTM: . A B HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY C D IDENTIFICATION 1. Common name: .._...: wake 2. Historic name Ht�j:g r_nn Reach M tjg a,;4�j i*A iJAI 1 3. Street or rural address: 21$-220 5th Street Huntington Beach '9264'8, Orange City. Zip - County 4. Parcel number: 024-147-03_ David Burris 220 5th St. 5. Present Owner. Address: Huntington Beach 92648 X City Zip ,__Ownership is: Public Private 6. Present Use: Shops . ;City., Hall and Jail Oiiginat use: DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: Neo-Classical _Commercial 7b. Briefly describe the present p/►yslca/description of.the site ob:stnicture and describe any major alterations from its origin '-nndition: Stucco-clad, over brick,. this sifijg;le-story flat-roofed building once contained the City Hall and Fire Dept:. It: retains its 1930.' s appearance through the use of wood-framed plate glass windows, the _stucco facade, recessed entries and frosted glass transoms' (now •hidden under a wood lath screen). The doors on each end of the :three-bay building, are made of wood with a large plate glares window in .the center, while the door in . the center, which is not original, is of. paneled wood. The original brick of the main building can be seen along..t:he back.` Two doors and a double- hung window and three small single-paned. windows.,all framed in wood, occupy .the .facade. The flat-roofed, bVifsk-clad, jail wing occupies the western-most third of the back Half of, tihe lot. A wooden false front and shed-style porch roof have been welde'd', to. the top of the flat-roofed parapet. Largge"metal doors, which slide -on their original hardware, face east A 6'x 8' brick building in ..the corner of. the lot has a flat roof and one door and was the solitary conf'iilement area. -of the jail. The heavy became "a cleaners several Construction date: 1920: Estimated Factual { - 8. Architect S F' 10. Builder r 11. Approx.p rty site (in t Frontage Depth 107 . 5 i or approx. acnoge '12. Date(s)of enclosed photographs) ....: 3/86 13. Condition: Excellent _.Good X Fair Deteriorated No longer in existence 14. Alterations: Lath over transom 15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary Open land _Scattered buildings _ Densely built-up Residential Industrial Commercial Other: 16. Threats to site: None known—Pri to development Zoning Vandalism Public Works project Other: �ed eve lopmMY 17. Is the airucture: On its original site? X Moved?- . Unknown? 1 Related features: Jail in rear, original City 'garage at 214 8. . SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) The seat of Huntington Beach City government was located here for several years. The City offices were located in the eastern-most side and the Fire Dept. offices in the western-most side. The jail was housed in a long, narrow, flat-roofed 8'x 8' brick building in the southwest (rear) corner was the solitary confinement. In recent years the jail and the solitary confinement were in use as a cleaning plant. The metal-clad fire doors, which replaced the original wooden jail doors, run on metal tracks. A wooden she-style porch roof with wooden parapet has been added to the top of the jail. Because of its -importance in the planning and administration of •Huntington Beach, this building is significant to the history of the City. Few cities have their original jails still standing. The brick rear facade and jail section provide a good example of the form of a brick commercial building. Locational sketch map(draw and label site and surriundin streets,,roads,and rominent landmarks): 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is checked, numbesin order of importance.) • °1,$ '9L L Architecture Arts& Leisure ��,, •� ° �` Economic/Industrial . Exploration/Settlement 2 5C Government I Military Religion Social/Education 21. Sources(List books,documents,surveys,personal interviews �f� �1{p�• y( sz and their dates). 411 ° 411 01 2/86 410 , 22. Date form prepared •: ; ,` l By (name)D. Marsh Organization ThirCi eth Street Art b tect8.1pc. '14 Address: 2821 I m,�• F I • City N V AD 92663 . o, Phone: 7 4 673- 643 Historical Researchers: 1" • Barbara Melkovitch . ,y is 1s pro Jerry Person LE` P� ,218-220 5th Street 7b. Physical Description (Cont.) years ago. The combination City Hall, Fire Dept. . and Jail retains its 30' s .appearance. i i t L .' State of.California—The Resoun ency No. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RL_-.CATION HABS HAER" NR SHL Loc UTM: A B . HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY C D IDENTIFICATION. Community Bible Church 1. Common name: 2. Historic name: 1st Baptist Church 3. Street or rural address: 401 6th Street Hunting-ton Beach 92648- Orange Cit� Zip County s 4. Parcel number: Community Bible Church Box 69 5. Present Owner. Address: Huntington Beach 92648 X City Zip Ownership is:Public Private Ch B. Present Use: Church Original"use: DESCRIPTION .7a. Architectural style: Gothic Revival 7b. Briefly describe the.present physical description of the site or,-structure and describe any major alterations from its original condition: 401 6th Street Now the. .Community Bible Church, this large Gothic Revival building sits in the corner of 6th and Orange. The high pitched gabled roof has gables facing to the front, rear, and south sides. The gable face is clad in shiplap siding and tri- angular braces accent the roof edge. A 3story. square tower, capped with a bellcast hipped roof, is located near the corner. The top section is clad in wood shingle, louvered slats, framed by gothic arches accent each side of the bell tower, Stucco now- covers the exterior of the main body of the building. The main entrance is .through a pair of wooden doubled doors in the east facade of the tower. The open porch is concrete with a rounded corner and steps. A small front-facing gabled portico, supported by triangular braces, shades the entry doors. A single. door and. window are located on the north side of the porch. A large Gothic-style window is centered under the front and side gables. Stained glass is used in the windows and a wide stucco-clad band divides the window in half horizontally. Two small windows flank the larger window"in the south side. A single-story addition on- the east (:6th Streetl side features a flat roof with a ledge around the top. CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO B. Construction date: Estimated Factual 1909 J T - Unknown 9. Architect 10. Builder Unknown 47. R� r 11. Approx.Property sire (in feet) +'i �..• e ; Frontage 7._ 5._ Depth 117'S or approx. screws t�• 12. Date(s)of andosed otogrsph(s) 8/85 , r 13: Condition: Excellent,Good X Fair Deteriorated No longer in existence staccoed, addition on back .14. Alterations: 16. . Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary), Open land_.Scattered buildings Densely built-up Residential X _Industrial - Mihmerdial ' ether: 16 Threats to site: None known____Private development �j.._ Zoning Vandalism Publit Works project Other: 17. Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown? 18. Related features: .. None SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates,events,and personsassociated with the site.) This is a fine example of coastal architecture which is significant to the historical streetscape of the. City:of. Huntington Beach. Individually it represents a .statement of the skilled craftsmanship prevalent in the early City. lee. 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is checked,number in order of importance.) Architecture r Arts& Leisure to► Economic/Industrial_Exploration/Settlement Government .Military Religion Social/Education e� r� 21. Sources (List books,documents,surveys,personal interviews ► �, r� and their dates). ' 5/86 22: Date form prepared ` By (name). D. Mareh 1 . Organization Thirtieth Street Architer,;Vi In . Address: 282 Newport Blvd. City Newport ;Beach ' Zip 92663 I? :Phone: (714-§73-2643 AR tr, of 401 6th Street - Ct.,_eINUED A front-facing gabled portico; supported by triangular braces, shelters the plain door in the center of the east side. Two sets of double-hung windows .fl,ank. the door, and another set occuppies the space near the end of the south facade. The same style windows are used throughout the rest of the building. The addition appears to be late 1920's. i ti r State of California—The Resource, ncy .No. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION H/tg$ HAER NR SHL Loc UTM: A B HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY C D. IDENTIFICATION 1. Common name: 2. Historic name: 3. Street or rural address: 411 Sixth Street city Huntington Beach Zip 92648 County Orange �,.4. Parcel number: 024-132-13 5., Present Owner: Loretta Wolfe qr ; 411 6th Street city Huntington Beach Zip 92�°Ownership is: Public ___Private X 6. Present Uses Residence prigirw use: Residence DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: California Bungalow 7b. Brieflyy describe the present physka/.dewrlpt/on of the site or structure-and describe any major alterations from its original condition: Narrow clapboard covers the exterior of the single-story Bungalow shown below. Exposed beam ends and vertical , lath venting accent the offset front-facing gables. The offset wing, on the east side, is centered with a large plate glass window topped by a transom with vertical mullions. The front door is' located to the 'west of the front wing and is .reached via an open concrete porch. Brick piers accent the corners of the porch. : Double-hung .windows are used throughout the rest of the house. A second floor has been added to the garage. The original materials were matched. The owner says that the -house has 2 Murphy beds in. the living room and the original kitchen with a flour bin and cooler cupboard. The woodwork is 'the original clear fir. I 8. Construction date: Estimated___ Factual 1920;y 9. Architect Unknown 10. Builder Unknown 11. Approx.p size (in Frontape Depth�� 5" ... . or approx screw 12. Datelsl of enclosed photographls) 9185 n. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL CTION Date October 19, 1987 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, Interim City Administrator 12'C D�Y GIT�' pRp GvuNCIL yE Prepared by: Douglas La Belle, Deputy City Administrator fl Subject: HISTORICAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT CIT Consistent with Council Policy? [ram Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception 42) 4 Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: Wv— STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Staff requested City Council approve of the Historic Resources Survey and authorize the transmittal of the Survey and accompanying individual documentation to the depository at the State Historic Preservation Office in Sacramento. RECOMMENDATION: Staff 1wommends that the City CotiQcil receive the Historic ResQurces Survey aid direct the Historic a ources Board to clariftytheir ideas regarding impfie'nientation of to recommendations-pr osed in the Survey. ecifically, staff recomme that the Historic Resources Boa repare an analysis r ding how the survey wi a used as planning tool for the City, an what the implications accepting the Su ANALYSIS: The Historic Resources Board is requesting the Council to approve the Survey and send it and accompanying documents to the depository of the State Office of Historic Preservation. The Board reached this decision after analyzing the Survey and in response to guidance from Council liaison Peter Green who suggested the above request. The Council approved and funded the Survey which was completed a year ago (September 1986). The Board views the Councils official approval of the Survey as the first step in the attainment of goals and policies regarding historic resources in the City. The Board is currently in the process of reviewing the recommendations included in the Survey and will come back to Council with a prioritized list regarding the implementation of all or some of those recommendations. Among the recommendations that the Board is considering are-the following: - ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Approve the Historic Resources Survey and transmit it and accompanying documentation (Survey sheets identifying each structure ranked in the Survey) for deposition at the State Office of Historic Preservation. Also, direct the Historical Resources Board to provide the Council with a prioritized list of concerns regarding historic issues and how the Council may choose to implement the Boards recommendation. PIO 5/85 f CITY OF HUNTINGTOWMEACH -- - - - - ----CA 87=I40 - ... COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINCTON BEACH To From .. Honorable_Mayor-an* --u_--_-_-_ _. _-_. _Paul E. Cook,_Acting--_ Subject Date City Council Members City Administrator HISTORICAL RESOURCES October 22, 1987 SURVEY REPORT The Historic Resources Board is requesting the City Council to approve the Historic Resources Survey and authorize transmittal of the Survey and accompanying individual documentation to the depository at the State Historic Preservation Office in Sacramento. The Survey was requested by Council in the spring of 1985 in order to identify the historic resources of the City's downtown area. The Survey was completed in September of 1986 and formally transmitted to Council in February of 1987. The Council then formed the Historic Resources Board which held its first meeting in June of 1987. A priority task for the Board has been a review of the Survey and the subsequent request before you. The Historic Resources Board is making this following discussions with Council liaison Peter Green. The Board views the Councils official approval of the Survey as the first step in the attainment of goals and policies regarding historic resources in the City. The Board is currently in the process of reviewing the recommendations included in the Survey and will come back to Council with a prioritized list regarding the implementation of all or some of those recommendations. Among the recommendations that the Board is considering are the following: 1) Re—evaluating the structures ranked "A" and "B" in the survey. The consultant ranked the structures according to their architectural value, but not cultural/social—historic value, such as who was the original occupant of a particular house and what role did they play in the establishment of the City and/or County. 2) Augment the survey to include other areas in the city. 3) Consider an ordinance that would establish policies, goals and programs regarding protecting and enhancing the city's heritage. 4) Consider the establishment of historic districts and their implications regarding land use and zoning. 5) Consider the addition of a Historic Resources Element to the city's General Plan. RECEIVED UU F 2 21987 RED EyELOPMENT 1. Reevaluating the str• `ures ranked "A" and "B" in the Surv- The consultant ranked the structure:. _ccording to their architectural valL _ out not cultural/social-historic value, such as who was the original occupant of a particular house and what role did they play in the establishment of the City and/or County. 2. Augment the Survey to include other areas in the City. 3. Consider an ordinance that would establish policies, goals and programs regarding protecting and enhancing the City's heritage. 4. Consider the establishment of historic districts and their implications regarding land use and zoning. 5. Consider the addition of a Historic Resources Element to the City's General Plan. Rather than approving the survey at this time, staff is recommending that the Historic Resources Board analyze the Historic Resources Survey and its recommendations as a planning tool, identifying for Council how the Survey's recommendations can be used to implement policy and procedure regarding a Huntington Beach Historic Resources Program. With further direction from the Historic Resources Board, the Survey could be augmented with an appendix that identifies City goals regarding historic resources and states how the Survey relates, in importance and perspective, to historic goals and programs. FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: Approve the Historic Resources Survey and transmit it and accompanying documentation (Survey sheets identifying each structure ranked in the Survey) for deposition at the State Office of Historic Preservation. Also, direct the Historical Resources Board to provide the Council with a prioritized list of concerns regarding historic issues and how the Council may choose to implement the Boards recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Historical Resources Survey memo dated 10/22/87. 2. Letter from Historic Resources Board 3. Historical Resource Survey (Previously Transmitted) DLB:DTB:gbm RCA - 10/19/87 -2- (9311d) I� Rather than approving the survey at this time, staff is recommending that the Historic Resources Board analyze the Historic Resources Survey and its recommendations as.a planning tool, identifying for Council how the survey's recommendations can be used to implement policy and procedure regarding a Huntington Beach Historic Resources - ---Program:--With further-direction from-the-Historic-Resources Board;the-survey could-be--F-- ----- "-- augmented with an appendix that identifies city goals regarding historic resources and states how the survey relates, in importance and perspective, to historic goals and programs. Respectfully submitted, - • Paul E. Cook, Acting City Administrator PEC/DLB:lp Attachments:. Letter from Historic Resources Board Historical Resource Survey _ 2911a '�6iV.-- - .. � _- ... ."- .. ._ a .. -.r. .. +.. Y .. .-1 kr _�.. - -... y .. mot,:. ' .. :?4'• to i, Historic Resources Board - - u; CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH Post Office Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 October 5, 1987 SUBJECT: HISTORICAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT, DATED SEPTEMBER, 1986 Members of Council: In the spring of 1985, the Council unanimously approved and funded a historical resources survey in one section of the original city of Huntington Beach. This study was conducted by community volunteers under the guidance of 30th Street Architects, a private consultant. It was completed in September, 1986, and submitted to Council for adoption on February 20, 1987. At that. time, Council directed that a citizens board be formed to review the survey and make recommendations on it and other matters related to historic preservation. The Historic Resources Board was formed in June, 1987. It reviewed the document throughout the summer and met with Councilman Green on September 30, 1987, regarding its disposition. The Board, with the concurrence of Dr. Green, unanimously agreed to approve the document and request that Council take the following action: 1. That it approve the survey; and, 2. That it authorize transmittal of the survey results and the accompanying individual documentation on each structure to the depository at the State Historic Preservation Office in Sacramento. This action will complete the first step toward recognizing the significance of historic structures in the City and maintaining an integrity and quality of life for Huntington -Beach residents and visitors. Sincerely, J� . Barbara Milkovich, Chairman Historic Resources Board MB:DTB:gbm (9228d) HISTORICAL RESOURCES BOARD. Special Meeting-Study Session September 30, 1987 Members present: Bill Dow, Guy Guzzardo, Cheryl Hagood, Barbara Milkovich (chairman), Jerry Person, Maureen Rivers, Judy Walker (arrived late), Nancy Whitney-Desautels. Members absent: Janet Downs, Jeff Lamb, Sheldon (Tony)Thorne. Councilmen present: Dr. Peter Green Public: Arline Howard Excerpt from minutes: Motion by Whitney Desautels, seconded by Person: The Historic Resources Board requests that the City Council formally accept the Historic Resources Survey Report, dated September, 1986. Vote: In favor: Dow, Guzzardo, Hagood, Person, Rivers, Whitney-Desautels. Opposed: none Motion by Guzzardo, seconded bny Whitney-Desautels: The Historic Resources Board requests that the City Council transmit the Historic Resources Survey Report and all accompany survey inventory sheets to the State Historic Preservation office in Sacramento as final disposition. Vote: In favor: Dow,Guzzardo, Hagood, Person, Rivers, Whitney-Desautels. Opposed: none Maureen Rivers Secretary (9228d) 1 JOHNSON HEUMANN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES f-I I STnFiI (: ANV) Af ! II ► F (; TllI n. L. CONSULTANTS November 2, 1988 Department of. Community Development City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Attention: Ruth E. Lambert Assistant Planner Dear Ms. Lambert: As requested, we have begun our re-evaluation of the Huntington Beach Downtown Historic Resources Survey in the Downtown Priority Area, specifically in the vicinity• of the potential Main Street Historic District. We concur with the judgement of. the State Office of His- toric Preservation that such a potential National Register of Historic Places district does exist and that the east side of the 200 block of Main Street, which would be demolished by the implementation of the proposed project, is integral to the existence of the potential dis- trict. We note that the significance of the district is largely based on historical rather than architectural criteria. Our interpretation of the boundaries of the district vary somewhat from those proposed by the State in order to encompass adjacent historical resources. With these adjustments, approximately 57 buildings are included within the district, of which 43 (75%) are considered to be contributing and 14 (25%) non-contributing to the historic quality of the district. Of the 57 buildings, 1 is already listed individually on the National Register, and at least 3 more appear to be eligible both individually and as contributors to the district. Specific addresses, evaluations, and boundaries are presented on the attached map and listing. It should be emphasized that these conclusions are preliminary and are based solely on visual criteria and on the forms (DPR523s) completed as part of. the 1986 historic resources survey. Further research is required to substantiate the historic significance of the district and its components. Nonetheless, it does appear at this juncture that a potential National Register Historic District of local significance does exist. Sincerely, Leslie Heumann Christy McAvoy / POTENTIAL MAIN STREET NATIONAL RTEGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT C m • 30,3• O L-1 V 6. M • -Za Zz3 2Z6 2 Z I ® •zz,4 2Z 1 • GLIB 2_►7 • • ZZZ. ZI5 • ZZO •z�4 ZI3 O ' d 2-18 2110 O 2 1.4 b21O 2090 • LIZ rj 2�7 • • Zlo ZaS p zo(o i°4 • Zo t o O Z.O Z W&- i 2q ►z8® 0 ►z7 O isIZ6 • Islo iis• m M a 123 O 12A ro i►9• � �� 119 • • 12Z IZ►• e1Zz 117 p I►5 • III • ►o► 14000 P�cl F 1 C coAST HV�Y 'i-Etrf'•4T I V E D I STFZ.I GT' t3Ou t�1D�r2.� �S � W ® cor�t-Rz 1 I.ITo 2.s CL O N CAN- GD�lT(z.l C3 U"r'02 5 J Z S POTENTIAL MAIN STREET NATIONAL REGISTER HISTORIC DISTRICT Address National Register Category 221 3rd St. 3D 303 3rd St. 5*/3D 121 5th St. 3D 122 5th St. 3D 204 5th St. 3/3D 206 5th St. 3D 210 5th St. 3D/NC 314 5th St. 3D 215 5th St. 3D 218-20 5th St. 4/3D 11.9 6th St. 3D 125 6th St. 3D 128 6th St. 4/3D 129 6th St. 3D 101-09 1/2 Main St. 3/3D 111-13 Main St. 3D 115 Main St. 3D 117 Main St. 3D/NC 119-21 Main St. 3D 120 Main St. 3D 122 Main St. 3D 123 Main St. 3D/NC 124 Main St. P 126 Main St. 3D 127 Main St. 3D/NC 201-03 Main St. 3D/NC 202 Main St. 3D/NC 205 Main St. 3D 2n6 Main St. 3D/NC 207 Main St. 3D 200 Main St. 3D 210-10 1/2. Main St. 3D 211 Main St. 3D 212 Main St. 3D 213 Main St, 3D/NC 214 Main St. 3D/NC 215 Main St. 3n 2.17 Main St. 3D 218 Main St. 3P/NC 220 Main St. 3D 221 Main St. 3D 222-22 1/2 Main St. 3D 223 Main St. 3D 224 Main St. 3D 226 Main St. 3D 228 Main St. 3/3D ?16 Olive Ave. 3/3D 411 Olive Ave. 3D 406 Pacific Coast 3D 408 Pacific Coast 3D 410 Pacific Coast 3D/NC 414-16 Pacific Coast 3D 311 Walnut Ave. 3D 412-14 Walnut Ave. 3D 501 Walnut Ave. 3D/NC 503-05 Walnut Ave. 3D/NC 513-19 Walnut Ave. 1/3J) NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC: PLACES Eligibility Status Categories 1. Individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places. 11). Listed on the National Register as part of a district. 2. Determined individually eligible to the Register by the U.S. De- . partment of the Interior. ?.D. Determined eligible only as part of a district. 3. Appears eligible for individual listing. 3D. Appears eligible for listing only as a contributor to a potential National Register district. 4. May become eligible for listing when: a) more historic or architectural research is performed. b) the property is restored to an earlier appearance. c) more significant examples of the property's architectural style are demolished. d) the property becomes old enough to meet the Register's 50-year requirement. 4D. May be come eligible (as above) only as a contributor to a dis- trict. 5. Is listed or is eligible for listing under a local preservation or landmark ordinance. 5D. Is listed or is eligible for listing as a contributor to a locally designated historic district or preservation area. 6. None of the above. V 'Von-contributing. 3/3D Also appears individually eligible. 4/31) May be individually eligible. 5*/5D Appears individually eligible for local landmark designation. LIST OF MISSING FORMS MISSING FORMS Address Rating Evaluation Comments 112-16 2nd Street D 6 127 2nd Street d 208 2nd Street P 5 215 2nd Street T) 6 222 2nd Street T) 6 309 2nd Street C 6 310 2nd Street T) 6 312 2nd Street C- 6 31.3 2nd Street T) 6 316-18 2nd Street T) 6 317 2nd Street T) 6 321 2nd Street C- 6 112 3rd Street P d 220 3rd Street C- 5 320 3rd Street C 5 409 3rd Street C 5 315 5th Street D- P MSHD 305 5th Street T) 6 412 5th Street C d 613 5th Street P 6 119 6th Street 3D MSHP Addition to survey 125 6th Street D 3D MSHD 129 6th Street 3D MSIM Addition to survey 211 6th Street- C 5 217 6th Street T) 5 Address Rating Evaluation Comments 220 6th Street D 5 519 6th Street C 5 112 7th Street 5 Addition to survey 416 7th Street D 5 422 7th Street n d 423 7th Street D 6 504 7th Street D 6 523 7th Street n 5 526 7th Street n 6 602 7th Street 5 Addition to survey 607 7th Street n d 616 7th Street 5 Addition to survey 623 7th Street 5 Addition to survey 206 8th Street C 5 2nq 8th Street r, d 2.14 8th Street P d 317-10 Rth Street n 6 318 8th Street n 5- 327 £nth Street n 5 408 8th Street n 5 409 8th Street C 5 411 8th Street C 5 412 8th Street n 5 413 8th Street n d 506 8th Street D d 614 Pth Street D 5 Address Rating Evaluation comments 206 9th Street D 6 207 9th Street T1 5 216 9th Street n 6 32.4 9th Street n 5T)# NSHM 414 9th Street C 511# NSHP 416 9th Street n 5D# NSHP 502 9th Street n 6 507 9th Street n d 510 9th Street n d 602. 9th Street C 6 610 Qth Street r 5 614 9th Street P 5 12.2 10th Street r 6 208 10th Street P 5- 222 10th Street n 5 22P loth Street n 5 319 10th Street R d 320 loth Street C 5 414 10th Street n d 416 10th Street R d 43.9 10th Street n 5- 5n7 10th Street C 6 517 10th Street n d 520 loth Street T1 6 601 10th Street D 5 605 loth Street P 5 Address Rating Evaluation Comments 611 loth Street P 6 614-16 10th Street D d 617 loth Street D 5- 621 loth Street C 5 622 loth Street D 5 707 10th Street C 5P# WPH) 933 loth Street T) 5D* WPTM 935 loth Street D 5n# WPHP 210 11th Street 5 Addition to survey 212. 11th Street 5 Addition to survey 214 3.1th Street 1) 5 2.16 11th Street 5 Addition to survey 21P 11th Street 5 Addition to survey 219 11th Street 5 Addition to survey 220 11th Street 5 Addition to survey 313 11th Street I1 6 323 11th Street n 5 328 11th Street n 6 410 11th Street T) 6 5n9 11th Street R d 53.0 11th Street n 5 512 11th Street D 7 Not there 515 11th Street C- 6 518 11th Street D 5 521 11th Street 11 5- 522 11th Street D 5- Address Rating Evaluation Comments 524 llth Street C- 5 621 llth Street P d 628 llth Street D 5- 71n llth Street D 6 714 llth Street P 6 213-15 12th Street C 5 217 12th Street C- 5 220 12th Street C- d 2.21 12th Street C- 5 227 12th Street C 5 3n3 12th Street C d 313 12th Street n 6 315 12th Street n 6 317 12th Street C 5 32.3 12th Street C 6 503 12th Street C- 6 506 12th Street C- 6 522 12th Street C- 6 525 12th Street C 6 606 12th Street C 5 610 12th Street D 5 61Q 12th Street tl 6 620 12th Street C- d 623 12th Street C- 6 626 12th Street 5 708 12th Street C- d Address Rating Rvaluation Comments 712 12th Street C- d 719 12th Street C- 6 722 12th Street C 6 730 12th Street C- 6 735 12th Street C- 6 743 12th Street C- 6 315 13th Street T) 6 323 13th Street n 6 606 13th Street 5 Addition to survey P05 13th Street C 6 221 14th Street D 5 303 14th Street P 5 407 14th Street n 5 504 14th Street C- d 614-16 14th Street C- 5 724 14th Street D 6 726 14th Street n 6 506 15th Street d 622-24 15th Street n 6 202 17th Street P d 221 l7th Street n d 317 17th Street Addition to survey 37.6 17th Street 1? d 6nR 17th Street C 6 121 22nd Street C d 714 Acacia Avenue P 7 Address Rating Evaluation Comments 716 Acacia Avenue P 7 806 Acacia Avenue C 5 4M Acacia Avenue P 6 910 Acacia Avenue C 5 912 Acacia Avenue T) 6 1012 Acacia Avenue P 6 1112 Acacia Avenue P 5 1217 Acacia Avenue P 6 201 Crest Avenue 5T)# WPTm Addition to survey 221 Crest Avenue C+ 7 302 Crest Avenue 5P* WPHn Addition to survey 332 Crest Avenue C 511# WPHn 704 Lake Street 7 2.02 Main Street 3P/NC. MSHM Addition to survey 718 Main Street C- 6 72.1 Main Street r. 5T)* WPHP 724 Main Street C 5P# WHPT) 734 Main Street C- 6 735 Main Street R 5n# WRPP 737 Main Street C 51)# WNPT) 801 Main Street P 5P# WHPP 817 Main Street r+ 5P# WHPP 821 Main Street C 6 82.5 Main Street 51)# WHPP Addition of survey Address Rating Evaluation Comments 833 Main Street D 5n# WHPD 902 Main Street C 5n# WHPT) 90A Main Street C+ 5T)* WHPD 918 Main Street C- 6 920 Main Street C- 6 924 Main Street C- 6 1010 Main Street n 6 1024 Main Street C+ 6 1030 Main Street C- 6 1104 Main Street C- 6 1129 Main Street C 5- 1P12 Main Street D 6 1814 Main Street C- 6 607 Olive Avenue n d 6OR Olive Avenue D 6 914-16 Olive Avenue C 6 1111 Olive Avenue n 5 111.2 Olive Avenue n 6 1113 Olive Avenue n 5- 14O6-OR Olive Avenue C 5 2OO Orange Avenue C d 204 Orange Avenue D d 310 Orange Avenue . n 5 418 Orange Avenue C d 614 Orange Avenue C 5 7O7 Orange Avenue D 6 (711) Address Rating Evaluation Comments 712 Orange Avenue T) 6 902 Orange Avenue C d 914 Orange Avenue C 5 1105 Orange Avenue n 6 1107 Orange Avenue T) 6 (1111) 1410 Orange Avenue C 5 1411 Palm Avenue n d 205-07 Palm Avenue T) 5 343 Palm Avenue r 5 601 Palm Avenue T) d 1837 Park Street C 6 608 Pecan Avenue n d 612 Pecan Avenue C 6 613 Pecan Avenue Addition to survey 712-14 Pecan Avenue 5 Addition to survey 713 Pecan Avenue C 5 908 Pecan Avenue C 5 912 Pecan Avenue n d 914 Pecan Avenue T) d 1n09 Pecan Avenue T) 6 1n11 Pecan Avenue T) d 1012 Pecan Avenue P 6 1815 Pine Street C 5 1840 Pine Street (: 5 119 Walnut T) 5 214 Walnut T) 6 Address Rating Evaluation Comments 311 Walnut R 3D MSHD 5n1 Walnut 3D/NC MSHD Addition to survey 503-05 Walnut 3P/NC MSHD Addition to survey 705 Walnut D 5— 708 Walnut r d 1210 Walnut C+ 5- 1520 Walnut C 6 333 Yorktown R 5 (?) .}� { �OyC) � I U) w (D v u u u rl H I-1 �•1 •rl \ • ' � 1 I o o 4-1 a+ `� `.`. .,,,• i 4J CAEn z Ln doh 4J on b \``�\ ` r. .'j a \ 13 al 3)ITI I \ ,•,' i' J ' \ `� � ,' +vim ! ... 1S ON I ON033S ._. Z `� ::/ `!� ' •4• \ I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I' I I 1 I 1 I � i..� 'Q \ ♦ ` ` ,' O `♦ I I I I I I I W I i I I I I I I I= , ! _....- W IZ V ` \ ,- ,. '�' `\\`\ \ i 1 i I I l l j Q ' I l i I, I I a i 0 It 31 b \ \� \7 \ � III I11111 I I V •'�;;� ` ` I I I I • \. . I I I I I \ \ 1 1 I I I\ I it I � •1 1 1 I'I:..:.'.:... : 1 1 : Q �-• I I -- `•f'' . .. ................................................... ........... • . . ::>: --- �. *. i:�:' : :#:� :�I: r.t •{:;:;};:; . :s::; 1•i :: L; I III --- i f ` : v• _ Z I - LLJ r4 N/ 31 r. 3. H1 _ W LLJpzII +�f f I�t` ,!,•:fr' 1 I - - I � �,t�y�, I :�• '� ..{fir.•. . ..... . ........ •' I ::Ir':•t;'::#::::L:;;a;: `� I I I ZT i:•5:;1;:;;::. .•t;:•f:;: ' ' ' -_ - . HI is I 7"T" 1 I I I I I I I I Q •' I I 1 (1 ----- - ----- ' HIN3318II t, 1S H ----- .LS i I I11 III 11 1 III 1 II 1 1 1 ; I 11 1 1 1 1 I1 1I I I I I I I I I I ' V IZ 1 III1111 1 1 , III II W I 1 I 1 1 III I I 11 1 III I111 11 1 _�-_- ' uI > I I I i i i 11 i t I 1 I I11111 1 H1N331af103 1 '' 1S •LS 1 I 1 I I I I. 11 I III II 11 I 1 I I I I 11 1 I I 11 I I I �•, , I I , I I I � I I I I I I I ----- 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I! 11 1 111 I ••''(7 d I I 1 I I i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 HIN3 13 I iI v ra �,s. t r l L f•a ! 74 tg e J'a f iiP3t} 4tiYYj�M�SI h"'3ESti ''":+Y} '`e,0. 1r+� • � r S � r'S ,+i tC+ �. it .n9�4,.. 00 'N+r ti <l v �•ff � �:x� l e ,t f i,e f i.e s r i>a f� r r1• } jQ *i; �`a 4 t.,Av.17``�,r q✓.r3,.,09 tS' !. t`ce 'f� N"'?C.1t z '.� ,r..rr yt'.a:..Y.4K`�tE?� S e r`• ) ..£'�P r i :rat• l� d. 1 4�3 �T'a 1� hajTM1, ' 1 • I A �f ERRATU1r rl . PAGE 1 , LINE 31 "--has been of valuable--" 42. PAGE 9, END OF' LI14E 7 , "--uuilaings aria 1.roviaes--" #3. RAGE 12 , LINE 2 CGRFFCT SPELLI1146 OF "--throuih--" #4. 1�AvE 3uC CORRECT ADDRESS OF 114 i'Ch TO 204 5TH ST, AND CGRFtF:C'1' 2(j4 5TH ST TO 114 i CH. �E,. 1-AGE 4u LI CE 23 , "--by amendinL the--" DELETE an in sentance iAuE 49 , LI IE 0 , DELETE nay. rr 17 . :;Ahi-LE I JVENTOXY FGH'.�: LOST OFFICE : 21.'D )1%6 rly , LI;vE 4 CORRECT Ile #19 , LII E 6 , CORRECT SrE'LLIfJG OF "--work--" * #f . SLNVEY PAGE : CORRECT LATE OF lUl-1Cy'iz i-IAI;%J i G 192CG SURVEY i-AGE : CORRECT i�ATr:; OF 111-113 1'�.AIN 5T 10 1,122 * r 10. 'SURVEY PAGE : CORRECT DATE OF 126 J. .IN TO l r30 * #11 . SURVEY ?AuE: CGi RELCT DATE, OF 224 ,;AIJ%1j TO 1�41 * 12 . .SU1;VM i;AGE : DELETE 316-322 i,11,IA (�I;ILT 19E U) * #13. Si11;VE Y ?AGE : CORRECT i:ATE OF 410 I•.AIN TO l 4b *NOTE .ri;, 9 , 109 11 , 13. ilwntinL.ton reach n12 From GrZinal Owner HLOORIC FaMOMIMSsaRYBY RE CITY or BBB September 1986 Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. 2821 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92663 i PAGE I. OVERVIEW A. Preservation in Huntington Beach 1 B. Summary History of Huntington Beach 3 II. PURPOSE A. Purpose of the Study 6 B. Sum ary of the Study Process 8 C. Opportunities and Problems 9 D. owls of the Study 10 III. SURVEY ME3 .= A. Overview of Survey Approach 11 B. Description of the Rating Systems Used 12 C. Identification of. Architectural Styles 19 D. Survey Procedures 32 E. Role of the Heritage Conmittee 33 IV. SURVEY PINDIAGS. A. Windshield Survey Findings 34 B. Inventory Findings,: 39 V. R1100"MMEATIONS A. Introduction 40 B. Potential Landmarks .41 C. Potential Historic Districts 42 VI. IMFLENEN TION A. Overview of Options 46 B. Provisions of a Local Ordinance 49 . C. Establishing and Maintaining Districts and Landmarks 51 D. Incentive Programs 53 VII. CMMUS 55 APPENDICES A. Swple Inventory Porms for Each Rating B. Windshield Survey of A and H'Rated Structures C. Windshield Survey of Coaplete Downtown Area D. Historic Inventory of Oo®trercial Core Area L1� � '141ffi�6 NUMBER TITLE PAGE 1 Summary of Findings, windshield Survey of Historic 37 Resources, Complete Downtown Area 2 Summary Tabulation of Windshield Survey of Downtown 38 Priority Area 3 Historical Cultural Landmarks Identified by the Open 47 Space/Conservation Background Report LIST OF FIGOFME NUMM TITLE PAGE 1 Boundaries of Study Area 7 2, Example of "A" Rated Buildings 14 3 Example of "B" Rated Buildings 15 4 Example of "C" Rated Buildings 16 5 Example of "D" Rated Buildings 17 6 Examples of Victorian Period 20 7 Examples of Colonial Revival and Neo-{,lassical Style 21 8 Examples of Cottage/Bungalow Style 22 9 Examples of Craftsman Style 23 10 Examples of Spanish Colonial Style 24 11 Examples of Period Revival Styles 26 12 Examples of 40's Tract Style 27 13 Examples of Pioneer Commercial Style 28 14 Examples of Spanish Colonial Revival Commercial Style 29 15 Examples of Modern Commercial Style 30 16 Examples of Artifacts 31 17 Historically Significant Downtown Buildings 36 18 Map of Proposed Districts 43 I. OVERVIM A. Prdwrvaticn in Buntiegtcn Beach. Preservation activities in the City of Huntington Beach have been promoted primarily by the Historical Society. Founded in 1968, this group has grown to a membership .of almost 300 persons. Meetings are held monthly and generally attract 20 or 30 members. The purpose of the group is to maintain an association of persons and to receive gifts and endowments for the purpose of preserving buildings, artifacts and other objects of historic significance related to the City of Huntington Beach. The primary efforts- of the group have focused on the protection and restoration of the .Newland House. This beautiful Queen Anne residence was built by William and Mary Newland in 1898. The Newlands resided' in, the house for 54 years; maintained• a large ranch on surrounding lands and were prominent in the formative years of the City. Together with a recently constructed. barn, the Newland House serves as a house museum and as a venter of activities for the Historical Society., In the spring of 1985; members of the Historical Society broached the, idea of embarking on a survey to identify historic buildings throughout the- City"s• old section. Society members felt that it was especially crucial to conduct the survey as soon as possible for two`reasoris: 1. The City's long-delayed Redevelopment activities were now in an active planning stage and could result in the demolition of important buildings in the near future; and 2. The City's ordinance requiring upgrade of seismically unsafe buildings (affecting many of the historic commercial buildings in the City's downtown) had been adopted and the grace period for compliance would soon end - possibly resulting in the demolition of these buildings. The City agreed to fund the cost of consultants to coordinate a survey of historic resources in the downtown; with particular attention on areas proposed for redevelopment. Additionally, redevelopment agency staff, Mike Adams, has been valuable assistance throughout the study in serving as liaison between the City, the consultants, and the Historical Society. Six members of the Historical Society formed a Heritage Committee to guide and direct the survey. Under City staff direction, a Request For Proposals was released in August and a consultant was selected in October 1985. Heritage Committee members have been active throughout the course of the survey. They have supplied labor and have found other volunteers to conduct field work, take photographs, check City records; prepare maps, research historic records and conduct oral histories. The role of the Heritage Committee is further detailed in Section III E. The consultants have trained these volunteers, coordinated and organized the effort and worked alongside the volunteers in all aspects of the work. Among the volunteers who were active in various phases of the program were the following 33 persons, whose names were recorded Page 1 on sign-in lists. To these people and the many whose names were not recorded, the Heritage Conmittee and the consultants express their thanks. LIST OF VOLUNTEERS Patricia Bothanley Betty Lamas John Bozanic Philip Liher Bee Brady Kay H. MacLeod Nancy Burg Pat Mallay David Cohen Barbara Milkovich Appolonia Eisele Jerry Person Guy Guzzardo Ron Phelps Andrea Harris Jane Reiland Lisa A. Heyne Clyde Reynolds Gretchen Hood Teresa Reynolds Arline Howard Maureen Rivers Isabelle Jefferee Richard Rowe Shawn Joyce Sheldon Thorne Dell Jungbluth Mike wischmeyer Beth Kennedy Susan Lucio Worthy Betty Kennedy Billee Kennedy Cindy Labelson Page 2 B. 8==ry History of Beach The land which included Huntington Beach was a portion of the Spanish land grant, Las Bolsas, given to Manuel Nieto in 1797. Subsequently, the land was part of the Stearns'Ranch holdings which were dissolved during the 1880's land boom as farms developed on the former range land. Some of these early farmers settled at several locations in what is now northern Huntington Beach, Westminister and Fountain Valley. Post office were established, schools and churches built. In 1901 , a group of farmers and investors decided to build a residential/resort community on the bluff above the popular area known as Shell Beach. Spurred on by the success of Atlantic City of the East Coast, they named their venture "Pacific City." Although the boom of .the 18801s was long over, the entrepreneurs hoped to capitalize on a new one developing in coastal resort cities like Long Beach and Newport Beach. However, the f first speculators did not have the resources to carry out successful promotion. Soon they sold to a group of Los Angeles businessmen, ultimately including Henry E. Huntington. Huntington, who was expanding his Pacific Electric Railway system, was ready to bring it into coastal Orange County. On July 4, 1904, the first Red Cars of the Pacific Electric rolled into the new city and its name was .changed to Huntington Beach. After an initial land rush, typical of the coastal area, the little city grew solely, but steadily. In 1906, city boosters attracted the Methodist convention away from Long Beach by donating a large camp site and building a 3,000 seat auditorium for that denomination. For over ten years, visitors and year around residents flocked to the gospel meetings there each summer as well as to other conventions like those of the GAR (Grand Army of the Republic) . By February of 1909, Huntington Beach was incorporated and the first City Trustees were elected: Charles W. Warner, David 0. Stewart, Matthew E. Helme, Charles M. Howard and Edmund Manning. In 1911, the first building ordinance was passed and formal records of the City's expansion began. Most of the commercial buildings in the present downtown were built during the first fifteen years as were schools and a Carnegie Library. The bungalow church which still remains at 6th and Orange is one of those built by the city's first. residents. About 1914, an "Americana" (encyclopedia) salesman bought land from the Huntington Beach Company to subdivide into small lots and give away as premiums with the purchase of the book sets. Since land sales to individuals were .slow, the developers were delighted to be rid of the surplus land which was unsuitable for housing because of its deep gullies. Their .relief probably turned to dismay when oil was discovered on the property, known as the "encyclopedia lots", in 1920. The discovery well, located near Goldenwest and Clay Streets, was modest. The second, however, was a mighty gusher, blowing in at 2,000 barrels of oil per day. Overnight, the composition of the ommumity was changed. Page 3 Housing of all kinds developed rapidly for the incoming population. A tent city was erected on the abandoned Methodist campground. Tiny cottages were built on 25 foot lots to house oil.workers and their families. Second stories of commercial buildings were remodeled from office space to roaming houses for single laborers, and even barns and garages were converted into rental housing.. Large homes, which had been built along the oceanfront in earlier years, remained the choice residential neighborhood. Now this section- expanded inland, extending between 17th and 23rd Streets. As adjacent-oil fields behind the neighborhood were explored, speculators and residents realized that oil fields-probably existed below the oceanfront neighborhood as well. Bowing to public pressure, the City Council agreed to allow drillingr ,of. this "town lot" area in April -of_ 1926. Within a short time approximately 300. dwellings were moved, some as far as Fullerton,. oldtimers say, to make way; for; the oil rigs and production equipment. A third oil strike An 1933 had world wide .inpact because of .the new .techniques it demonstrated. Up .until. that time, drilling had been on the near-vertical, directly over an oil pool. With the invention of controlled directional drilling, first used successfully in Huntington Beach to tap;,,the ;tide .land pools, a well could be drilled on a slant, in any desired.direction.. ,Within a year, 90 wells were .producing from tall rigs along the'c -astlinep..,' -These bobbing pumps remained the symbol of coastal Huntington Beach for many years and were frequently used as background for movies, including "Giant". Now, most are gone or masked by. plantings.. A f inal oil strike,came in 1953. Located near the old 'commercial area, this strike resulted in removal of another, more modest, residential area. Drawn by good land and-water, resources, a few industries, including,the Holly Sugar Refinery, Huntington Beach Brown Factory and La _Holsa Tile:factory., .had. developed prior toe1920 ,to provide jobs.for the resort'.s residents before the discovery of oil. But, as the oil field activity spread into' the industrial area north of the ci.ty.limits, most of the original industries moved away or converted their operations to oil. This meant that the city was economically dependent on- the petroleum, industry and 'the beach recreation business.. : Completion of Pacific Coast Highway..±in 1926'amade the city more accessible by auto, increasing its popularity as'a way stop for Mexico-bound tourists. By the mid 1930Is, the City of Huntington Beach had. acquired-the beach front which extends from the pier,to Beach Boulevard. . State beaches were developed on both sides of the city beach, creating.some 8.5 miles of nearly unbroken public beach. . Surf ing was introduced to Huntington Beach in the late 1920's and local boys became skilled with their heavy redwood boards, but Huntington Beach wasn't a widely recognized surfing spot until the 1950.Is. The first surf shop, "Gordie's Surf Boards", opened in 1955, Within a few years, surf shops dominated the downtown commercial area, and have continued to do so until the present time. Page 4 At the insistance of Pete Beltrom and Norman Worthy, then directors of Recreation and Parks, the first United States Surfing Championships were held in Huntington Beach in 1959. Fame as a "surfer's paradise" followed for the city and its historic pier, largely as a result of TV coverage of the annual event, beginning in 1960. The championships continued under city sponsorship for fourteen years, and surfing contests are still held at the pier each September. Although most of Southern California experienced a housing boom after World War II, the boom had comparatively little effect on Huntington Beach because so much of the surrounding land was in active oil production or agriculture use. But in less than a decade, land values had increased dramatically in Orange County in response to the housing demand, and outlying farms were sold for ,development. The City of Huntington Beach annexed a great deal of land between the original city and the proposed San Diego Freeway on its north and east. The city's population mushroomed in the annexed areas near the freeway, which was separated from the original city limits by the oil fields. Industrial and commercial areas developed for the convenience of the new neighborhoods while the older areas remained unchanged. In recent years the oil fields have been cleared of unsightly old rigs and operations have been Consolidated so that the land can be used for other purposes. Many substantial single and multi-family structures have been built on the 1926 "town lot" site and more new development is planned for the area. Currently, the City's focus is on rejuvenating the original commercial district through the efforts of a Redevelopment Agency program. This survey of historic resources has concentrated on that portion of the original City included within the present redevelopment boundaries in order to identify and evaluate the historical significance of the buildings which remain within the area. The focus of the recommendations of this study is to encourage incorporation of outstanding reminders of the City's past within the redesigned downtown. The inclusion of these reminders of the past will help residents understand the history of their community and generate a heightened sense of pride in their hcme town.* * History of Huntington Beach, prepared by Barbara Milkovich, 7/31/86 Page 5 II. P'fIltFOSB A. Purpose of the Study , In October 19851, the City of Huntington Beach authorized the preparation of an historic/resources survey. The survey area includes the City's Downtown and adjacent areas closely related to the history or development of the City (from Lake Street to Goldenwest) . (See Figure 1) . The Downtown Priority Area and Commercial Core Area were subareas which received special review, as described in Section III-B and IV-A of this report. The survey covers structures, sites and artifacts within those boundaries related to the City's history from the origins of the community to and including 1946. The City's purpose in requesting the work is to provide documentation of potential historic and cultural resources so that City policies and regulations can be established to protect and preserve these resources while allowing for new development. The City is actively pursuing a number of redevelopment projects within the survey area. The preparation of the survey at this. time was intended to provide information about historic resources and to develop plans by which crucial resources can be saved while redevelopment activities occur. The products of the study are divided into three different documents, as follows: 1. The Final Report (this document) , which identifies the methodology used to conduct the study, summarizes the major finding of the study, and includes recommendations related to implementation of a preservation program; 2 . File Documents, which will include all of the inventory forms prepared in the course of the study; and 3. A Public Relations brochure, which will highlight the findings of the Survey for general distribution to the public and will be designed to disseminate information on preservation and to develop public interest. Each document will be designed to be used alone, but all three are closely related and each will provide reference for the other documents. Page 6 WAffR iQ, Q "Pr a ~ O W Y Z Y 111 on � CLAY c N / 'L = Y SEA' v O •I I KE JJ 9"m A � �tr ern F JK ,� Como .- K J't HILL SEACLIFF = VILLAGE _ YORKT ■ r /� CIVICu 9[ACIi iC.FNTE J QaIVm aw Sv+F W I O I wK'uL R�1 CLAIpaw oif „n l +� HI SCFW. I i ':J ` I TI CA '\ �M1INA , p A +awe O e 44)•, ' 0 wrST I _ SFR PALM d�e`� �d �' rJ. C-PRIh FIE A J Z Y ICIAA -FOdTI O ` •\ \\ L,/ '9 �!�\ ; ce ` 13 TH i�5'•YiG 0*' lER I H • �SCH r O IIAE'APf1 i t TH Ll vC_ � • � � l� fM CC, j OC �� JOLIt \F\ NACr - - - - - I N I x �t r q�• 4C JETR f' \\ `• �' 4'T CHICAC C DOWNTOWN PRIORITY AREA A ^a dA I 0 COIURQAL OORE AREA �• ���ti rp f'rF 1 ti �h DOWNTOWN STUDY AREA 0 1000 2000 Figure 1 SCALE i N FEET Boundaries Of Study Area 7 B. Summary of the Study Prooess The survey involved the coordinated effort of a consultant team consisting of Thirtieth Street Architects, Inc. (responsible for coordination .of the survey -and preparation, of planning r ecommendat ions)and Diann Marsh (preservation consultant, responsible for survey work). The three documents described above are products of a six.to eight month study effort, generally.divided_,into four phases, as follows: Phase 1: Resource Identification and Program Preparation . The-purpose of this phase was to acquaint the consultant team menbers.with the City's historic resources and the specific interests and requirements of the City staff, the Historical Society and the Heritage U nmittee .responsible for directing the survey. An important task of this phase -was a, thorough windshield survey of the entire study area to provide an overview. of .potential resources. A-second task of this phase was to develop a detailed'. methodology to be used in subsequent research. Phase 2: Publicity. Recruitment and Training of Volunteers The purpose of this phase was to gather and organize; the .-survey .resources - including volunteers as well as training and survey materials.- .A major task ..of this phase was the "Survey Blitz" training day for volunteers,. which was held on Saturday, December 7, 1985. Phase 3: Survey•Research and Esraluation This phase was the core of. the study process and had as its objective-. the compilation of information as needed to complete the Historic Resources Inventory Forms in accord with the standards-of the State Office.of Historic Preservation. Tasks involved in this phase included field work, library and records research and mapping of inventoried structures. Phase 4: Preparation of Inventory Documents The purpose of this phase was to refine. and coordinate documents prepared during the study process to a cohesive final product and to prepare related documents or materials for public information. The tasks of this phase included preparing recommendations and conclusions drawn from the survey work for inclusion in the Final Report. Preparation of a public relations booklet. for public distribution was also part of this phase. Page 8 C. Opportunities and Problems In the course of identifying individual structures for subsequent survey work, the consultants observed both opportunities and problem areas in the City. These are described briefly below. These City's historic resources provide opportunities to the City, if an historic preservation program is implemented.' These opportunities include: - Identification and preservation of historic homes and buildings provides local residents with a sense of continuity with the past and their place in-history; - Tax incentive programs which can be used to encourage rehabilitation of historic structures, particularly revitalization of the downtown commercial areas and rental housing; and - Historic homes and buildings interest people and can attract visitors to the City as a whole. In the course of our review, some problems were observed in the City. %bile many of these are not problems that the survey alone can solve, programs based on the survey information could be designed to develop solutions. - Lack of coordinated or consistent design standards giving a cohesive image to the commercial core; - Destruction of important historic resources to make way for new development; and Modifications of buildings with good architectural character by inappropriate techniques or methods which obscure the original design. The recommendations derived from this study will include suggestions for improving these problem situations, where these are amenable to City regulations or incentives. Page 9 D. Goals of the study With the review of the Heritage Committee, a series of goals for the Historic Resources Survey have been defined and are listed below: - To identify the historic and cultural resources in the City of Huntington Beach to provide a basis of information for future planning; - To identify structures within the commercial core of the City which should be preserved or protected in conjunction with the City's efforts at redevelopment; - To develop recommendations for City policies and regulations designed to preserve sufficient historic resources to evoke the distinctive Character and the important stages in the history of Huntington Beach; and - To promote community awareness of local history and historic architectural styles. Page 10 + l III. SLEW M A. . Ovesview of Survey Approach The methodology developed for the survey of historic/cultural resources has these objectives: 1) to maximize the research effort on those structures or sites found to be of historic importancef 2) to provide a comprehensive data base on all resourcesf and 3) to provide a basis for evaluating the historic structures and recommending programs for preservation. In order to accomplish the objectives, the survey effort was carefully organized prior to the initiation of any survey work. The four primary aspects of the survey methodology are summarized below: 1. Andshield Survey: A complete windshield survey of resources was conducted to identify potential resources and to categorize these in terms of possible significance. A total of 554 structures were identified as having been constructed prior to 1946 within the Downtown Study Area. (Clay Avenue on the north, Pacific Ocean on the south, Lake Street on the east and Goldenwest Street on the west) . 2. Architectural Rating: Based on the initial windshield survey, basic architectural styles found in Huntington Beach were identified and categorized. Additionally each structure was given a preliminary rating based on architectural style, as to its possible architectural/historical importance. This rating system is described in Section III-B and the architectural styles are described in Section III-C. 3. Survey: Survey procedures were established identifying methods of recording information during the field survey and methods to tailor research efforts. A further description of these procedures is provided in Section III-D. 4. Evaluation: The roles of the Heritage Committee to review products and provide advice and direction on local resources to volunteers and to the consultants was identified through discussions with the Committee. Their involvement is further described in Section III-E. Page 11 B. Description of the Rating Systm Osed An initial effort of the consultant team was to conduct a thorough "windshield survey" of the City, which involved driving the City methodically and recording locations and architectural styles of buildings. The purposes of this survey were to identify the number and location of potential resources and to categorize -these resources in terms of possible significance. The secondary purposes of the survey were to acquaint the consultant staff with the City as a whole and to familiarize them with the range and types of architectural styles_ found in the City. In conducting the windshield survey the consultant staff drove through. the entire study area on a street-by-street basis. Specific notes were made on the architectural styles, building condition, and ages of buildings which were observed that were likely to have been built prior to 1946. Based on this initial review, each structure (or group of related structures) was assigned to one of four categories. (A through D) , as described below: - "A" Buildings - This category includes buildings which are obvious examples of historically significant or notable structures indicated by distinctive architectural characteristics or age. Occasionally, the structure's relationship to patterns of local history is evident (such as the High School) and would be included. Many of these buildings are potential candidates for individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places and research is likely to reveal a connection with important local persons or events. - "B" Buildings.- This category includes buildings which are somewhat less unusual or distinctive in terms of age or architecture. In general, however, these are well designed buildings which research may prove to have a relationship to important events or person in history. Many of these buildings are likely to have local significance. Some of these .buildings may also be candidates for the National Register, depending on the results. of research. TO Building. - This category includes pre-1946 buildings which reveal much of their original architectural style (not substantially altered) . These buildings are fairly modest in architectural style or design but could be found to have historical importance based on research. Most of these buildings are good candidates as contributing structures in an historic district. - "D" Bui dings - This category includes pre-1946 buildings which are clearly not significant in terms of architectural style (or have been substantially altered from the original style). While information from other general research could indicate a link between some of these buildings and important persons or events in local history, the modest nature of the building makes this connection fairly unlikely. Buildings 'in this category which are not altered or can be restored may contribute Page 12 to an historic district. Figures 2 through 5 illustrate the differences between these ratings using photographs of buildings in Huntington Beach. Because of the imminent redevelopment of the commercial core between Lake Street and 6th Street, a more detailed review of structures was made for the commercial redevelopment area. This inventory included a review of structures between 3rd and 5th Streets extending to and including the Pier by a restoration architect and research on the historical significance of these structures. Based on these findings each structure is again categorized into one of four groups as described below: 113" Ratina - Possible National Register Listing - This category includes all. A-rated buildings which are obvious examples of historically significant or notable structures as indicated by distinctive architectural characteristics or age. mere research indicated that the structure's relationship to patterns of local history is significant, these would also be included even if the Windshield Survey rating were a B or C. These buildings are potential candidates for individual listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 112" Rating - Possible Contributor to a District - This category includes buildings which are somewhat less unusual or distinctive in terms of age or architecture. Many of these buildings have local significance based on the results of research. These buildings contribute to the historical ambiance of a possible district, but are not likely to be National Register candidates on their own merit. - "1" Rating, - Possible Contributor if Remodel Reversed - This category includes pre-1946 buildings which have been altered over the years so that their original design is obscured. These buildings could contribute to the character of an historic district if the building were rehabilitated. In a few cases, these buildings could even be listed on the National Register if the remodeling were reversed. i "0" Rating - Not Historical/Very Altered - This category includes pre-1946 buildings which have been substantially altered from the original style such that rehabilitation is difficult or impossible. Also included in this rating are structures newer than the 1946 cut-off date. Three additional designations were used to indicate special situations; they are: - "R" Designation - An "R" is added to other ratings to indicate a residential structure. Since the downtown is a commercial area, residential structures would not normally contribute to a historic district, even where these may be architecturally significant. I Page 13 5 �1 '^i .p '•a+�r '.�,.r^�^+f tip.�_"'1' �' ! F Ag A y FaJ, r x l•. 1 ML .l 1 � by�S py. 'n t• r } _ r � i •I • � 1 r k r �J����,,y, 4^id1,�7•k 1 w� tea. � 1 �� \ _l y�\,� � .t�. f t'.��µ` a< r Fly L�t�� h� � � ''4 x A •r . i r • ,,w; xr ,•x'g, t il ■ r -.fit .S24-_,,��3.n%.i ?� `►Now 1, /r r• ,4k 1 �a i gtry i au , K I Y :1 so ' si 1 F l +f'''7.,.1� axe a� ':,�I > 1', .'�� , ,�.'�.• 1 411 41, r'y , Figure 4 n, S i'ca�'"M.. .r�.nf':,.MrYa '! _ r_r..rr'',�.•Y Examples V A i•,yes_ /�A s f L � K 1 � C �h 4 >T d M 1 �� � �, �`�s•tom 'tea S$✓fr..`'�,�� r��Y ;� � � a' '-� {' .�1i ��ti M1 ?�' + � j}�ile >�� 1,S� - ff �•�:ty,"• i a.y�°mot A- t�id► 'irq� � ;.c '�y sM�S� e a '°�,���71° 1 -�° 1 ��� 1° rk.'W5� < ..�.an�F{�)'k•-),.5{ yi'V rs ip���.+��y� �!'�•tY E.. Eal �,�.�9���xhf ��1.�� ' Y92 ,fTy�Y R � SZF� rT h �'? � k ' Y.• i•1 .�.� 2 f, q � � � 1 � 11 1 h j .i. r� .. V �.hit i.��r'�•r��i•'+'��-"` r� ' �� _ _ ,r < = I r`6:\. Y+�'av z". alV•T'1jt'y,. �Y'^g-f'�rvej.N'• i _ •� ri i r=r�t�a ' 1 P � ' 'q V' r•. f G a e.¢� Nf �7: i�. f %r44 ?7:r its 1 � 1 • / 1 Designation - A "*" is added to other ratings to indicate that the structure has historical importance, even though the architectural significance .is lacking or covered by alterations. These buildings would contribute to an historic district if the alterations were removed. - "Y" Designation - A. "Y." (for yes) is added to the other ratings to indicate those buildings which will require seismic upgrades under the City's seismic ordinance,: based on a survey conducted by the City. These ratings were reviewed after research had been conducted on each structure's historic significance. Where research indicated the structure was related to important persons or events in local history, the rating was adjusted, as appropriate. Thus, the ratings shown on the Downtown Historic Inventory chart reflect both the architectural character (and need for rehabilitation) and the historic significance of buildings within the Downtown study area. Although not located within the 3rd to 5th area, an additional commercial building worthy of note is the property at 513-519 Walnut Avenue. Built in 1903-04 by M.W. Helm, a prominent early resident and Mayor, the buildings at this address have been given an "A" rating on the Windshield Survey and are possibly eligible for National Register Listing (a "3" rating) . Page 18 C. Identification of Architectural Styles As described above, one purpose of the windshield survey was to identify the general architectural styles common to Huntington Beach prior to initiating detailed research on individual structures. Seven major residential styles and three commercial styles were identified. The residential styles are briefly described below and illustrated in Figures 6 through. 12.. - Victorian - approximately 1880-1901 These homes range in size from mansions to cottages. The style features an irregular plan and elevations, frequently broken up by towers or bay windows. The exterior is generally decorated with spindles, fretwork, sawnwork and elaborate scrollwork. The exterior walls, are frequently ship-lap siding, often with different wood-shingle patterns in the gable areas. Specific styles within the Victorian era include Queen. Anne., Queen Anne Cottage, Italianate, and Eastlake. (See Figure 6,),. - Colonial Revival or Neo-Classical Box - about 1900-1912 These homes emphasize a rectangular volume with classical ornamental trim, often seen in the style of the porch columns. The roofs of this style are often gabled, Dutch gabled or hip roofs with. dow style The window styles are generally double-hung and wood-framed, often with diamond decorations or arranged in a slanted bay. Narrow clapboard siding is commonly used on exterior walls. (See Figure 7) . - Cottages/Bungalows - 1912-1940 This category includes small, fairly unadorned houses, beach cottages, and California bungalows. Exterior wall surfaces were covered with board-and-batten clapboard or stucco. Most styles have large porches and utilize wood frame windows either double-hung or casement. (See Figure 8) . - Craftsman - about 1905-1920 These homes feature informal plans and simple box-like shapes, Typical of this style is a heavy use of wood and an emphasis on structural members, including exposed beam ends often with brackets. The roofs are generally wide low gables. The wooden windows are either wide double-hung or casement windows, often placed in groups of three and often accented by wide wood surrounds. Exterior wall surfaces are commonly wood-shingled, stucco or clapboard siding with river rock or clinker brick frequently used for foundations, chimneys and porch piers. (See Figure 9) . - ,hanish Colonial Revival, - about 1910-1925 These homes feature simple box-like shapes, often with flat roofs and no overhangs. The wood-frame windows, often casement, are set in stucco walls. Roofing materials are generally red clay tile, but may be visible only in a small fringe along the front facade. (See Figure 10) . - Period Revival - about 1920-1940 These homes borrowed images from Mediterranean, English Tudor, Federal, I Page 19 1 Si m pp 4� ,qyS � ��� ,.JF, ��'S 'N 5 Ci�'•Tl '>r)7.,�J';'1f c�[. w� t $'2 J u64s�lypl �I ' ?3lih + 4dSti.s -. aq`,r 3 • � 1 11 r- v. � � .. � h: �. � _ * I 1 tL t-r Y'Y � .. �1 .�;. 1. 1 1 n�. 'r k �. �' �M 1� � fir' } r�J Y � { f' > Y. - •� i ji,c�' ,yam;K 5k. r +a ,. r. • 1 �3r-�,. T � .sy �S�h+ y ''� .}�..':. � 4 V � ¢ sA .: r' § '.3i ' '��t r } � �� � �iwi .+...+.�..��r ties' �.X. t� `� ! -F" r� �•' i�" ��t _2�' a�.. Y � . .F r t SS X _ t �,y..^`�,^�tiya", 'y�y4"��-.`x '� ,—"--.. .. �.a "} a�'„�'"�,,;" fit^ ��'}r kit �` W ;'a, �P'r�'';' tr � Syr�.Y.�iw��-x�+'4 ,����';}�q y.rc SV� s�.b,r-r '�„� :� +'��'�,}� 4,7+.�. Ski �.,rf. n o-.l-b �* ;, f., .s n r • 11 � 1 � 1 1 r. fr .tom f •' {!�''ii�� ^ h"``Cs t Y{Gt i� � ,�'�+t v t'i}F n'7gs{�y���4J'(j W1h,�4Q e, , �� �, y -it 6 R v \' iV� n v`v�i•�Y - Y ..�11 ���y``b v �J t'!i i+, M r', ,� i �� 1�-�j��y A�'�T � .o {• dny .� ps'1 !1 ��tia�r 7J�.�". i w s . titi +' m ,Rt�F ,ir' F» �y u ��` 4 ,gar �.ter--�..►_'�f-t_. ,v r•s, d 2� 1 a �er �' f f OFJ,f t �,--....•�...-r.-.---"*�'— •. 1 ` .,�-` h it ,. � y''.r y✓'h Tel lj�,� �' F� 1�f'� �,h.,,r r,r,, v ; t?,',� '� 'N �j' ' 7 1 i 1 1 • 11 1 / ��'�Gw"fn� �`�£�k'R tb f`,(�i u.�.`'4"`';•.i • 3 7`�.�.�v-r+pn t � «'�+.r 4 {"rs ,�S�F�-SW s ' r Y i K � / yy _,r rj f•'F �wr r����P {�,��} - ? �yt3j(��I,r'�'`5�,..���r� r � tiq . t » • f 1 s � M aa, 4-N7 t Rr $Lt t i 44 vy h a ti s y� _ .� t' ✓n f�tw c� "` 1� .� y -4 is •nay 1f 1 1 Georgian, French Norman, Moorish and other styles. For many of these, the roof lines are steeply pitched with a style emphasis. The Mediterranean Revival homes featured stucco walls, parapets, tile roofs and arched doors or windows. Although distinctive from others in its purer form, elements of the Spanish or Mediterranean Revival styles are often mixed with other styles of this period. Window forms are generally casement or double-hung and the front door is often heavy wood in design. Most homes of this period do not have front porches. (See Figure 11) . - 40's Tract - about 1940-1950 These homes marked the first development of tract homes. These ranch style homes generally have composition roofs and stucco clad exteriors. The windows are generally double-hung and are wood frame. (See Figure 12) . Commercial styles in Huntington Beach appear to be less varied than the residential styles. However, commercial buildings - much more than residences - are often "updated" to whatever style is modern, convenient, or fashionable. New facades often simply cover, but do not destroy, the original front of a building. Since details which could reveal the different styles are often obscured, a fairly simple system of styles was used in this survey. The broad category, most frequently used in 20's Commercial or 30's Commercial, used to refer to simple commercial buildings of that era. However, some examples of very early buildings (termed here as "Pioneer Commercial") , Spanish Colonial and Modern styles can be found. These are briefly described below. - Pioneer Commercial. - approximately 1900-1910 This style is the earliest found in the City. These one and two story structures were often constructed of wood with an extended front facade or "falsefront" which creates the illusion of another story. - Spanish Colonial Commercial - approximately 1920-1930 Buildings in this style are characterized by stucco exteriors and ornamentation in cast stone or terra Gotta at the cornice line or around doors and windows. Moderne - approximately 1925-1935 This style incorporates various styles commonly known as art deco, but more properly known as Streamline Moderne and Zig-Zag Moderne. The Zig-Zag style generally occurred earlier and usually incorporates angular parallel-lined ornamentation, sometimes with an Egyptian or Gothic influence. The Streamline style was derived from aerodynamic forms and is often most evident in the rounded corners of buildings and smooth curved lines of ornamentation. These styles are illustrated in Figures 13 to 15. In addition to buildings, the survey also identified objects or artifacts of historic importance. These include such items as the cornerstone and entrances to the pier. Examples are shown in Figure 16. Page 25 �t • ' ^�i try F4,� 1 t �✓lCM1 b� 4{Y f t s y 4 A ; � + phit �� tt� ..cg - T f 't •��y��� }C r ! dy t d i C,..p�i Yt�✓ °y.+�+,t (�.�+ q 1'q T�J�, t'�h,'�, ,�3}Y y' '.,+F jA1 1 �Y j Atk�,a�� •IS,•y 1'�'l� t re"'r�•( j`5 �4�1 F�1G Yf�L �` }.yr. � }x r r f� 7s�,'1 tt �v , � !�' •t rA (: tag a,t, 3 Y3'� r 5 4, �,� I t 1�, •�1 Al w'r"M lC' •{t1�4t �S� 'r� Y A'tta ii� !1t A t'^c;�.�cw.t X u • t �n t,(�''yy�y{�� h n d 4,�'' �x �Y, 1`�p t ,T"i� h � 1 cw Sr..v,. , 1 �� J-,7}T':�..7+f ..•.� n�'i C�;�`t'�'.��+.�✓�'F pt ��k Lrf� �`�} y!!l{,� n..7 t�� `9 P�7��5,t''f� i .' i' �qj r dj i•; 5 j Yt� II t ,�f Yr e` �'7Y 5"'�ri xe`?( +}'? r • � " �7'r I � �A� 4�°d�M1 H nC��'7✓„•�'r ,, �r ��+}4•yf 4�,.�.5 t�.s.�i�.n' ye h�31 4 .P Y� *<.Yw ta}e• i �+fyy�-Ir,� A �%E ia'T }s T�Y «nF�a,� , � f J. �•A..i'A.r i '�PT i�� ' 4 jr wi �+�*� r s'p�`, �✓1' Sri�'C""� �`� � ,•r�-���,•v�,r �7.,� £,''ri��� `*3�h4+-"'�`+'�„'tie�.,, °n,•,,r,.,��t�y-,F• �;�Tu� �. ' ,�' iYi3 H f"*tit 4il`� c4 0" ,�"r y,.. f ,6 H �6 i•r ',`'ro•{' 'satd'��° a' i�x.y,,`�r A,-0 l'T` �' %���yy.,,F r� 4'l S yk .�1J a. '` �"t a t A v d• AVN1•� r ����y'��`'� C871�,,}�N�O f�P+� s�� t�a�1'"'l�,T, �I dE"l��t`T' � y,Y�,�•�' .ekyL�a. � 4'�1e' f f�5;'���",'SL,s•'�`ff�`4rt 4 zN 1 ,J•��c�'+] �pq �td•'} y h 1jyyS�ft } C Q,.4f 4d E, ,�fir'c11 k 2.�4; � `4�AW+ ..W.,�,._. RN.�'`�4 K��3 kola t�t��+�13vC t t f x't .,4 i 1 �•�'T 1 •,.,� � r 7 k.j � C tc rr{ ���` .Y FhRS i 7•+t+ � i� +✓ � °e�',�r !' a �. ,,gyp v � a .�'.J�Fxi'�d�ti,•a �1 •'.r S'"� +rrr i{•;5k.�" ��^fir'`Y' js144,• '/�. 1 1 w • J F� , Ykt k t ��I.�.ti� �� t Nh•,� Y :Y �5r q6'� ' 1 r f, � � d 4t� r�S.�Y f t J 1'..4 � e �•• fi 71, oN t 1 A r �il iF tJ )te•r� fir' �'•.y�"�y �1J"�l � �. ':•': '� 4•., i ' ,w fs _ 2� "�',�' ;a'•tx f.A� a'�'i�3•.e6,.�'.�it rL"�4>'1yh..+t:Rr y'�,�•:1 �`r'py�t .M�`... may,.,,,�y�,,, • 1 1 /1 1 1 � 'z z�'•'�"� S e Y F t t "''` z r a� �!lHOND '�'9NF 4 t r hssv' 47, s„'�' '.'}' k t 17'� ,,a J, z_+y,L� t� 9F zr(3�� r Y.q ' sf "i�'+c..t 'ti"_•`. "fag, i •a''�5r�j r"�' a t k{p k ! :�rrt�v �� ,w., � f �i.� s; i (' G -w. 1 a , M kk� h P b H Yr, PRO �. tut• r� '�4 y '� r1;. 1 � t •.rr��<�;t� ti . V •41 u��S.-Rrf JY �'� �� � � J� ' 7t �W' 1 ���� `T'^�• � ��. Cry �, t1c F;ab} , , „w r vry 7 f!•r 4 -N 7 �, Y S1�i+ -tt,1{i 3� k i.,,11 y.� :.• 7` f 1 • r j '1 + ir kph} D '�4} ��`. � TSt..sh it S�h\ d • y. .A 4 yQ �� � � fiM�' c 2� •,7 \ h � ? ,t � �. 'S 7 JI M1 rt �' kI ,,rr. S.R�6f2�,� �t 4 � ` y.l` ft ` r h 'a��l �yt�'' ti¢�'` i,•t' .` (5 y' „ r tie r h e. ,� �' 4,4 ">� �,•,,, t 'yiid`F �,i, < '•!_'5+;,`1 i ` it l '1"7 k� IL i 7 4 f1 mil ...^ a^ ,�.L�'�}L''�r�'3"���'�m a�R�s�"'�''<1�+�,`�`.��' t�'ti+1+Y� l�.sbtx�"re,�;4ey�,.,-....a.—�--,•••�,..3.ue � n 1�� �{p��w�ta��^�a�'�r'ii5��t�a� �•,F" �� +�t� �1 �. a`r`. n�Y + �i µ, ✓} l,y t�w�t ri� e c�':"`C }� ����t�f` 4 i , ) � f t � � S 4. V 7 a f,.. + c�i�{ �ti �f ry�`?k �"J r.' ��p��,M, t(``'��r�`�""'�. •[m�,t }L K.{+ J i�. +,!y �tr". • �:' r� ar �'� ��1 a 1z` .r'.�,.'w p-r��A.FL rr� � ti . i {y,+rw k4+t + j n^ N�1 �Po vs—s • 1 11 1 � � • � • t )n. A r r `C •. ) t., u� ti':Y 61 ru,«.t;;A1'�'� 4�yttP����� 7 ^y�"i lb-,dYrt i�,�`yw SI t ,-.f°li✓i- �,1�•� n i.' „"IyK Ili ,i.i,.,i • 9 t Yz ,/1� llltl�bt 410. 4.rt ��� r � � iws h l '�"`�'� `t �...i��,) ,+ r t°�� �5..��4•��4; .' `r r # f' f 7 t .:F�t 4 i ��� 7 � t.r t i• 5 s It�.1.::ru.1�;+1 i' IS.�.i�-� � r w� ..t�f.y���` w.. , �1•ru1 ��r 9 ra�ua4Fyp r• k r �� + r ) A: ]a i,.dir 1� 504 fFcAyy116 , L t V t ? J ry r � t �•' 1 ;iu ' in sF Tpra,.w t `• ?sly x,u _ .r ,•.� T rr ., v ;4 �$t�� � � T. ��.ez,.1 ,�-�'� ,34+_�Sh.i�r `3 I MR .rr _ •;�x�.-�!�4j t1�'r -����, e,�13,E iyi`,�, C•� �� + ti� t �Y�'a��lt• � ^'G �L t F_7..�.€ nL' �X�^�0ti���W '"^�•,r,'i�.� r�' a* ..fir� at �rrt4�gi,S' {�,�, rrt�,•�+f"4Y `��k��..�,',? �au.j .4rF-i �-1F ,, l�i,'ski•S �- rrh i f��+,v�;'"'� i �,;T. �^jr f �`'`-�''d>fr�2,�' �. r N.S x�.� K� + ¢ >.4 '•'�i-r s =c+a1 ,+ �. �3 0 �t e 4g s,�7�� � y �►r �' Y axi•11"'�„+� .4i' r N��s�i� ���"�:�t����i�T,u ti � �;+�'d� t � Y 01� 4 n 3;�7 w�Y� � s�3^��x y, .7 t�w� fi '�• t f a^.,.�.k r1] r..�� y 'c •d- •''��ayr�'l_ j�,;��0',.n J�f�,�W�y., ace r�tu� �� — , •,.4 � c� a'4'Svx a�,�,�"��� l;�" 5 w t f f q�,q,-x«�i� &s,.` 11 / 1 D. Survey Procedures The survey work for Huntington Beach is based on the guidelines set forth by. the State Historic Resources Inventory, Survey Workbook (revised March 1984) . The two primary elements of the survey work performed are field work and research. For both elements, the initial windshield survey served as a guide to focusing the work, as described below. 1. Field Work The field work effort involves completing the State Historic Resources Inventory Form (DPR 523, Rev. 4-79) for pre-1940 structures which are rated C or better. The 40's structures and D-rated structures have been documented by photographs. The DPR form identifies and locates the property in detail and provides space for a description of architectural style and of historic significance. The basic identification portions of the State Inventory Form and the architectural description section were completed for each structure surveyed. The architectural description was based on the architectural styles set forth in Section II.0 and the Architectural Supplement contained in the State's Survey Workbook. Portions of the field forms were completed by volunteers including address, architectural description, photo and sketch map and were submitted to the consultants for review and completion. A number of architectural descriptions were completed by the consultants. Field workers involved in this effort included members of the Historical Society who were trained by the consultants. These workers included Teresa Reynolds, Vern and Jo Soltis, Jerry Person, Tom Andrusky, Bill and Barbara Dow, Nancy Berg, Barbara Milkovich, and others. 2. Research In. order to maximize the research effort on structures or sites of historic importance, the extent of research was matched to the categories identified in the windshield survey. Special effort was focused on researching A and B rated buildings. General research related to original owner and date built was conducted for all of the A, B, and C-rated buildings. Members of the Heritage Committee also solicited the recollections of long time residents at a "History Night" meeting on May 6th and subsequent driving tours. Volunteers in these efforts were Arline Howard, Maureen Rivers and Barbara Milkovich. Page 32 E. bole of the Heritage Co mittee The members of the Heritage Committee include six members of the Huntington Beach Historical Society. The Heritage Committee participated in the selection of the consultant to conduct the survey and provided input to revisions of the work program which occurred during the selection process. Members of the Committee are: Arline. Howard, Chairperson Guy Guzzardo Barbara Milkovich Jerry Person Maureen Rivers Susan Lucio Worthy The study program was designed to provide regular meetings between this group and the consultant team to assure that the efforts of the consultants are responsive to the needs of the City. Throughout the course of the study survey, Committee members were actively involved in preparing inventory forms, in conducting research and in participating in the overall survey. The Committee was able to monitor the progress of the work and to provide local input on the evaluation of historic importance. The involvement of Committee members in the study process is viewed as an essential component in making the study truly representative of the City itself. Page 33 IV. SIAt W FIDDINO A. Windshield Survey Findings The windshield survey evaluated a total of 556 buildings within the Downtown Study Area, which encompasses the area from Lake Street to Goldenwest Street (east to west) and from Clay Avenue to the Pacific Ocean (north to south) . These 556 buildings are the ones which appear to have been constructed prior to 1946 (the cut-off date recommended by the State Office of Historic Preservation. Based on the A-B-C-D rating system, described previously, the survey found 22 A-rated and 81 B-rated structures in this area. Thus, 103 (or 18%) of the 556 buildings located by the windshield survey are considered architecturally important buildings. (See Table 1) An additional 333 buildings (60% of the total) were considered C-rated. These buildings retain much of their original style, but are modest in design. Generally, these buildings are most important when they occur in clusters or groupings that can, collectively, convey a .sense of history or which retain the image of the original neighborhood. The complete windshield survey results are attached as Appendix C. Due to ongoing redevelopment activities and proposals for development in the very near future, two subareas encompassed within the larger study area were also reviewed and tabulated - here termed the Commercial Core and the Downtown Priority Area. The Commercial Core is the smallest of the study areas, including 5th Street (both sides) on the east, Pacific Coast Highway and the pier on the, south' and bounded by Orange Avenue and Third Street on the north and west, respectively. These buildings were given an A-B-C-D rating initially, as shown in the Summary of Findings, Table 1. Because of their importance to the City in ongoing redevelopment efforts, however, they were further evaluated on a 0 to 3 scale, as previously discussed in Section III-B. This more detailed evaluation determined that seven commercial and one residential structure were found to be of greatest architectural and/or historical importance. These buildings include the following: 1. 303 3rd Street (Arthur Young Building) 2. 218-220 5th Street (Old City Hall) 3. 126 Main Street (Standard Market) 4. 228 Main Street (Clark Hotel) 5. 316 Olive Street (Post Office) 6. 304 Pacific Coast Highway (Macklin Building) Page 34 4 C\ Y vy+,.rty� yrti, ! Tr- ��sl Y�.d4 ;W� ',N.. 0. �.'� s ';H �rU :>� �4R,r 1Q�.^P'�' �yq "� �,i,k• �t��! 7'hr.`. r ..rt ✓ ` x `4. t& 7' hSt hC s 7 tR'y:- ��`n •'" c' j �, t .,� c r�^ ar � �k,...t tiu• �.k S'.fr^�v'?,.�x'f" qi.,'f """.'tom, •f � Es.� r�, .... �"'.��,y,,. r .,+'i �__-,,.. gYtysw t1 S ti P `'^7• u { 1 11 ,�� t:._ �T►as.., �� Hti �f� s'�"$�l s�'' �;.vs.+' "+ ,f,���f a��"-� t(i�% J .�. I r� L e.��`• ,,* �•�.�s ��{ r �,t� .€tea• ;- ® f t1 ''� 'C;,..� :� `+.ter �,��,,-,) �..�,r '•s �l�r /4 ti , • ' 7. 306 Pacific Coast Highway (Golden Bear) 8. 204 5th Street (Residence) Subsequently these three additional structures were identified in areas adjacent tc the 3rd to 5th Commercial Core and are considered noteworthy. 9. 114 Pacific Coast Highway (Garner House) 10. 513-519 Walnut (M.E. Helme House Furnishing Company) 11. 128 6th Street (Helene-Worthy House) Photographs of these buildings are included as Figure 17. Since the survey was completed, two of the most significant structures have been demolished: the Golden Bear (306 Pacific Coast Highway) and Wayne's Automotive also known as the Macklin Building (304 Pacific Coast Highway) . Of the remaining 70 buildings in the Commercial Core, these were rated as follows: Rating _# % of Total 0 9 12.9 1 27 38.6 2 22 31.4 3 5 7.1 R 1 10.0 70 100.0 In general, the Downtown area has had a relatively small number of intrusions of new buildings or buildings lost by remodelings ("0" Rating - 12.9%) . However, the area incorporates a large number (27 or 38.6%) of buildings which require removal of non-historic alterations in order to contribute to the historic character of the area. A similar number (27 or 38.6%) of buildings are the 2 and 3 rated buildings which are significant or which currently contribute to the historic character of the area. i These findings are further detailed on the attached chart. The Downtown Historic Inventory chart. This chart, attached as Appendix D, also includes the architectural style, estimated construction date and a structural/seismic rating based on a prior study by the City of unreinforced masonry buildings. The second subarea studied, the Downtown Priority Area, incorporates the Commercial Core and surrounding areas. This area is bounded by Lake Street and. 6th Street (east and west) , Pecan Avenue and the pier (north and south) . This area includes 135 structures of which 9 are considered A-rated and 36 are B-rated. These 45 structures, or 33.4% of the total, are the ones which are most important architecturally and historically. In addition to the summary of these findings previously presented in Table 1, a street-by6-street summary tabulation for this area is presented in Table 2. I Page 35 • �� �'� i{`� kF. i7t" �'�.z a � �rt n nuuu47w re�roiw,v, ��'�.r-r �altx�F 1 g. �,K"# r / f.: � F}""„� ��{��y �r `F'A`�r-i" t � "°Y�`tx • 1 2 •�K" 'Y"1 'y6 r ✓a „ 4 t s 5 rt 1 L�i `L 1 '�4�: �r�}�; l�� �� "r � tot L���q>•''{�� ee{ r—',�gsm s•`�`�' rise r a •Ym '` '...u� a � � l is � / ��` •L � ,.da ti J t T'"'� �� �a jam s q t � e A a-. ; � 6 �aq,.a� F � y� f�`•-� p�n+�'.P"€�,�����i's�„��,'04 �as��'�'..',� 4�t � � j �����y a�•�' �,�raKy�k 40. . A" �=� COURMST DIMM[lG - •'NS[ • , 306 Pacific A _ �Vw Coast Golden Bear lowv 114 Pacific Coast ' h Residence e 11 �s o ,�,lt ysS. y„ i z 41 1 lor b3. - 204 5th ST. Garner Douse Figure 17 cont.) Historically. Significant Downtown Buildings 36c i'Y✓ .. - .w'. A.L.Sy�~L.��n ..r-:i. R�.z>.'Z3'a... 110 X, z'iF tti1s� `z'Yt'�eN Il� �v t 1� r ryF- �`�`rr� �. I�,aE�y'L�I�•Z.' x�. s t � 1 S I PI I S i �r I • .. ; F'F �rErJhinih ,- 'U' ,Q f011 t c � �a I r r ae.. r 11 SS 111 j`�I 1 fI .jui�V`t`llii��t� ia _ 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 ' • 1 1 SU?99WY OF FINDINGS WIADSHIEW SURVEY OF HISTMIC RF90(11ES CORP'LEIE DOWNEM AREA, M7 OF HUNrIMMQB BEDS Comercial Downtown Complete Downtown Core Priority Area Study Area Number and % (3rd to 5th (bake to 6th (Lake to Goldenwest of Structures Streets) Streets) Streets) by Rating # % # % # % A 8 11.1 9 6.7 22 4.0 B 27 37.5 36 26.7 81 14.6 C 37 51.4 78 57.8 333 59.9 , D 0 - 12 8.9 120 21.6 Total 72* 100.0 135 100.1 ** 556 100.1 * Includes 304 and 306 Pacific .Coast Highway, now demolished,* both rated as A's. ** Rounding error of 0.18 L Page 37 7NME 2 SUMMMU TABULATION OF ,D SURVEY OF DOWNTC 1N PRIORITY ARM (MIKE TIS 6TH STREET) STREET A B D TDTAL 2ND - - 9 2 11 3RD 1 3 8 1 13 5TH 1 4 10 2 17 6TH 1 1 17 3 22 LAKE - 2 1 - 3 MAIN 3 18 28 1. 50 OLIVE 1 1 - 1 3 PACIFIC COAST 2 - 4 - 6 PECAN - - 1 2 3 WALNUT 1 2 - - 3 ARTIFACTS* - 4 - - 4 TOTAL 10 35 78 12 135 * Includes pier structures such as the bait shop, pier entrance, cornerstone and pier shops. Page 38 B. Inventory Findings The A and B rated structures comprise less than 20% of the total number of older buildings in the City. The most unusual ones, which are given an A-rating comprise less than 4% of the City's resources. These 103 A and B-rated structures are listed in Appendix B. Nearly half of these premium structures are located in the Downtown Priority Area. A sizeable concentration of A and B-rated structures are found in the 700 and 800 blocks of Main Street and the 200 and 300 blocks of Crest Avenue which crosses Main in this locale. In general, research has found that those structures rated A or B were either the homes of early prominent. citizens or the early business and City buildings. In instances where research revealed important connections to historical events or persons for C-rated structures, the survey rating was adjusted accordingly. However, nearly all of the historically significant buildings are also architecturally significant. A copy of the inventory forms for an A-rated and B-rated building are attached in Appendix A as a sample of Huntington Beach's premier resources. Inventory forms were completed on all 103 of the A and B rated buildings of which 23 are commercial and 80 are residential. Nearly 60% of all of the buildings recorded on the windshield survey were given a C-rating, with 22% rated as D. These numerous C-rated buildings are distributed throughout the study area, often interspersed with new buildings or ones which have been substantially altered (D-rated) . Where grouped together, these buildings can provide a neighborhood that evokes a sense of history and a feeling of the past. Because of the new intrusions or extensive alterations, few areas remain that include a full city block with a good concentration of C-rated (or higher rated) buildings. Some of the best remaining concentrations of C-rated buildings occur, as follows: - 9th Street (from 310 to 511) - 8th Street (600 block, except 602, 608 and 610) - 7th Street (600 block) - Main Street (600 block) A copy of an inventory form for a C-rated building is attached in Appendix A as a sample .of these resources. D-rated structures were recorded by photograph, a sample is attached. Inventory forms were completed on approximately 260 of the 333 C-rated structures, including all of the 115 C-rated structures which are located in potential historic districts. Page 39 V. REOOMMENnATIONS A. Introduction The City of Huntington Beach has a good resource in its historic buildings within the Downtown study area. Based on the findings of the Historic Resources Survey, the consultants recommend that the City adopt an Historic Preservation Program designed to protect landmark structures and districts. Potential landmarks are those individual buildings which are significant either architecturally or historically. Potential historic districts are those collections of buildings which retain the feelings and associations of the past, without major alterations or intrusions of newer development. In this section, recommendations are made regarding mechanisms that the City can use to establish preservation programs which would protect these resources. I i I Page 40 B. Potential Landmarks The premier historic resources in the City's Downtown Study Area are those 103 structures which have been given an A or a B rating. These structures represent the very best that remains of the past, and they are a vital link to that sense of continuity with the past that distinguish "just a place to live" from a "hometown". Any historic program that the City may adopt should pay particular attention to these premier structures. . Among these 103 which are considered 2gtentially eligible for listing in the National Register, are many which are actually eligible. Any preservation program that the City may establish should, at the very least, preserve those buildings which are determined to be eligible for the National Register. These buildings should be preserved on their original sites since that is an .important criteria for National Register eligibility. Additionally, other individual structures which are not eligible for the National Register may have a local importance and be worthy of local protection. Among the total of 103 A and B rated buildings, the survey identified eleven buildings in the Commercial core and immediate adjacent areas (including two residences) which were potentially eligible due to their architectural character and/or their association with historical events. These are listed in Section IV A. above. Of the eleven structures, the Golden Bear (since demolished) , was both architecturally and historically significant. The structure was -a rare example of Spanish and folk art architecture, particularly with regard to its cast terra cotta embellishments . Historically, the structure served as an important dinner meeting site with customers including Errol Flynn. and Lionel Barrymore. More recently, the Golden Bear had become famous as a showcase for young talent. Other structures, which still remain, include 218-220 5th Street. The importance of this building is not immediately apparent since .its facade has been altered. However, research has shown it to be an early City Hall and jail, which has obvious importance in the history of the City. Protection to these National Register eligible buildings can be provided at the local level through a variety of mechanisms at the City's discretion.. The best protection would be the adoption of a local ordinance establishing historic landmarks in the City. Mader the ordinance, modifications to local landmarks would require special review by a Historical Commission or Board, appointed by the City Council. The ordinance also can delay demolition, if such is proposed, while alternative solutions are sought. In order to provide economic assistance to upgrade and maintain these landmark structures, the City may wish to provide owners with low interest loans from redevelopment funds. Additionally, owners of landmark structures can grant facade easements to non-profit agencies and receive tax benefits where existing zoning permits a more intensive -use than the historic structures. Further information on these implementation programs is provided in Section IV.D below. Page 41 C. Potential Historic Districts In addition to individual structures, collections of buildings are important from a historic preservation standpoint where these collections represent a distinguishable entity which conveys the feelings and associations of the past - even through the individual buildings may not be significant. Generally termed an historic district, these collections of buildings maintain a feeling and association of the past by an internal coherence and integrity. In other words, the buildings relate to one another in the same way that they did originally. In Huntington Beach, three areas have been defined which appear to the survey consultants to be a "distinguishable entity" with the "internal coherence" to be considered as potential historic districts. These three areas are the Main Street Historic District, the Ninth Street District and the Wesley Park District. These districts are illustrated on Figure 18. Collectively, these districts include 158 historic buildings - approximately 6 A's, 24 B's, 115 C's, and 13 D's. 1. Main Street Historic District The Main Street Historic District incorporates the 200 block of Main, the 200 and 300 blocks of Fifth Street and cross street buildings on Olive Avenue between Third and Fifth Streets. This district includes both commercial and residential buildings and reflects the early small town development of the City. When originally proposed at an earlier phase of this study, this district was to include the 100 block of Main, pier buildings, and adjacent buildings on Pacific Coast Highway. Subsequent demolition of the Golden Bear and other buildings has lessened the historic tie of the Main Street area to the pier. At present, planned redevelopment does not include rehabilitation of the buildings in the 100 block of Main Street, although this block includes six historically significant or contributing buildings (3 of which require remodelings to be reversed) . Therefore, in an effort to consolidate the remaining important historic resources, the district lines have been drawn to exclude the 100 block, but extended to incorporate more of Fifth Street. The proposed Main Street Historic District includes approximately 22 pre-1940 buildings, of which 10 are rated as contributing or significant buildings. Another nine buildings are possible contributors if existing.non-historic remodelings are reversed. Should redevelopment plans be changed to allow for restoration of the 100 block of Main Street, the consultants strongly recommend that this block also be included in the Main Street Historic District. The boundaries of this, district have been extended slightly beyond. the core area of existing resources in order to preserve a consolidated geographical area and to provide a locale where existing historic buildings, in the path of redevelopnent, might be relocated. In particular, important buildings or facades from the 100 block of Main could be relocated to the 200 block. Any or all of these facades that could be moved would reinforce the historic nature of the district - however the resources which are in the best condition (rated as a "3" or a "2") or those which are historically significant (shown Page 42 � 'R• YL/1 ^�r X �JA ti AN OLT- VAA e g ' it � e p ��l �'� ♦.,ram ..�♦ I�!• � � '.� : •,♦ -'��' Via® _ •^ems.!z ! i .� Moj "s�.�;.'^./ Aci _"�=�. -r+. B fi s.-.r. r ., by "**") should be given priority. Since the State's criteria for historic districts is that 65% of the district must retain the historic character, this district would not be eligible for National Register consideration as it stands. However, many of the ."1" rated buildings require only minimal, rehabilitation in order to contribute to the district. Minor rehabs such as painting or removing inappropriate signs can be accomplished quickly and at a low cost. The State's 65% criteria would be met if only 4 of the 9 buildings with a 01" rating were rehabbed. After the area has been evaluated for the National Register - or if it is designated as a local district only, historic buildings or facades could be moved in from .threatened areas to create a consolidated historic area. p Preservation of an historic district within the City's core-can provide a strong focal point for the community. Preservation of a'district, rather than individual structures, also allows owners, whd would not otherwise be eligible, to take4'advantage of federal tax credits. These tax' benefits provide a credit of 20% of the rehab costs on certified `rehab'work for contributing buildings within an historic district. These owners could also take advantage of facade easement programs or other local assistance programs. Since the proposed historic district is within the City's Redevelopment area, programs of low interest loans or grants maybe feasible.'to encourage owners to upgrade their buildings. 2. Ninth Street Historic District The Ninth Street Historic District incorporates the 300, 400, and. '500 blocks of Ninth Street from numbers 310 to 511. This residential district includes mostly small Craftsman and Spanish Colonial Revival houses built in- the 1910's and 19201s, representing worker's cottages typical of the early development of the City. This area is well consolidated and will = require rehab of existing buildings, reversals of remodelings, or infill of moved historic houses to establish a cohesive district. 3. Wesley Park Historic District The Wesley Park Historic District incorporates an irregular boundary focused primarily on the 200 block of Main Street and the 200 and 300 blocks of Crest Avenue. Also included are adjacent areas such as the 600 and 700 blocks of 7th and 8th Streets, areas on. llth Street across from Parquar Park, and the east side of Main Street up to Tenth Avenue: This area includes many of the City's early quality homes which were moved to Wesley Park after the 1926 town lot oil boom. Many of the most significant historic residential buildings remaining in the City are located within this area, which retains its air of residential quality even today. 4. Types of Districts These district areas may be established as a National Register Historic District, a Local Certified'Historic District, or a local district. The National Register District must meet National criteria and be approved by the Page 44 Secretary of the Interior. Once approved, this district has the highest prestige and provides the best tax benefits under current and proposed Tax Reform Acts. A Local Certified Historic District may also be listed on the National Register, but first the City must adopt a local preservation program and have that program certified by the State Office of Historic Preservation. Subsequent designations of properties are considered Locally Certified. In comparison to a National Register District, a local historic district has the advantage of allowing the City more flexibility in determining the types of rehabilitation and inf ill which would be permitted. In addition the City could choose to move historic buildings into any of the districts, particularly the Downtown Core. The disadvantage of establishing a local historic district instead of National Register District is that property owners would not be eligible for the 20% Federal tax credit for the certified rehabilitation of historic buildings. Owners of structures over thirty (30) years old could, however, be eligible for a 10% tax credit. In order to combine the benefits of each, the City may want to nominate its best landmarks and core areas of districts to the National Register and then provide for local landmarks or local districts surrounding the National Register ones. i i i i Page 45 V1. A. Overview of options The City of Huntington Beach has a number of options available in establishing a local historic preservation program. While a number of the landmarks and districts discussed above may be eligible for listing on the National Register, such listing provides honor and tax befits - not protection. Many of the resources listed on the Register in prior years have since been demolished. It is only through local programs that true protection can be provided. For that reason, this report emphasizes the importance of considering preservation programs at the local government level. These are arranged in order from least regulatory to most regulatory and described below: 1. Information Program - The City can make the findings of this study available to private property owners and encourage them to apply for National Register listing or to developers interested in rehabbing National Register properties. Since this approach will be based on owner or developer initiative and since National Register listing does not preclude subsequent demolition or alteration, this approach will not assure protection of historic resources. The approach does, however, require minimal investment and fully maintains individual property rights. 2. Policy - The City may establish a preservation policy by resolution, by an amending the General Plan or adopting an element of the General Plan. The Open Space/Conservation Element of the Huntington Beach General plan adopted in 1,976 includes policies which encourage preservation and rehabilitation of historic structures. This document identifies Historic/Archaeologic/Paleontologic Sites as a °first priority" resource and states the city's policy to "protect valuable sites from thoughtless or unnecessary destruction: identify, analyze and preserve valuable sites." (Huntington Beach General Plan, Section 2: Policies for Environment and Resources, page 15) . Although the General Plan does not specify which resources are to be protected, background studies undertaken during the preparation of the General Plan in 1974 indicate that some survey work was conducted. Of the 21 structures identified at that time, eight (8) have subsequently been demolished. The structures identified in the 1974 report are listed on Table 3, along with an indication of which have been demolished. If the policy statements of the Open Space/Conservation Element were amended to include specific references to the landmarks and/or districts identified in this study, the importance of these structures as historic resources would be recognized in instances where City actions (including redevelopment) were to affect these structures. With a policy approach, .the City would not necessarily assure protection of the resources, but would at least, assure that a building's. historic value is weighed against the proposed action. A policy for preserving historic buildings which specifies individual buildings or districts would trigger an Page 46 MWS 3 HI8I KCAL CMMML Ufflm� InIFI® HY 2M 1 BACSOMM RS C501 C r OF 1 E Current Status, 1986 Listing from City Report, 1974 Deno Existing 1. Huntington Beach Pier X 2. Golden Bear - Old Town Buildings X 3. Old City Hall (Orange Street) X 4. Council Chambers X 5. Firehouse X 6. Old Jailhouse X .7. Huntington Beach High School X 8. Playhouse X 9. Colonel Northam Residence X 10. Newland House X 11. Sugar Beet Factory - Main and Garfield X 12. Warehouse - Main and Garfield X 13. Old Japanese Church X 14. Hubbel House (Moore House) X 15. inter Tower- Warner and Marina - view X 16. Water Tower - Bolsa Chica and Warner X . 17. Bolsa Chica Gun Club Site X 18. Ashton Oil Well #1 X 19. Bolsa Chica Oil Well #1 (Now "Bolsa" #1) X 20. Huntington Oil Well A-1 X 21. World War II Bunkers X * Conservation Potentials, report prepared as a background study for the City's General Plan, March, 1974, Figure 2-41, "Important Historical - Cultural Landmarks". I i I Page 47 f f environmental review when City discretionary actions (such as zone changes, conditional use permits, etc:) are requested. Also; proposed actions affecting historic structures would be evaluated in terms of General Plan conformance. This approach would not protect historic properties from destruction or alteration by private parties in instances where no..specific approval by the City was required. A policy approach to preservation may be reasonably effective if.the City is also able to offer incentives to property owners who pr.otect:j, restore or rehabilitate their properties. These incentives are often in.the,form of low interest loans or - in the case of districts - public . improvements such as antique street lights or street furniture. This approach also maintains full individual property rights. 3. Ordinance - The City may adopt a special historic preservation ordinance or may amend the ,existing zoning ordinance to recognize historic resources: This approach offers the maximum protection to,these resources,.(depending,. on the specific provisions of the ordinance) , but also poses some restrictions on individual property rights. Such restrictions are well within the City's powers to regulate for health, safety, and general welfare as-substantiated by a number of court cases. An ordinance generally defines the criteria for historic importance, establishes regulations (such as a design review process or delay of demolition) and names an existing or new commission or board to serve as the review body to implement the ordinance. The ordinance may immediately designate all of the landmarks and districts discussed herein, or may establish a procedure (including local evaluation, notification of owners, and public hearings) by which such properties are designated. . Typically, such an ordinance requires that when a building or demolition permit is requested for a .designated property, the permit request is reviewed by a special board to determine if the proposed change will alter the historic character of the property. Generally demolition permits cannot be denied, but can be delayed for a period of time ranging from 30 days to 6 months while alternative measures are sought by local groups, such as the historical society. Ordinances can be fairly lenient or very restrictive, depending on the extent of regulatory powers given to the review board and the attitude of that board in reviewing specific cases. 4. Overlay Zone - As a variation on the ordinance described above, the City may find it expedient to adopt historic districts by the creation of an historic overlay zone. This zone could include a design review process and other provisions similar to the ordinance described above. If a district is adopted, it is strongly recommended that design standards or guidelines be established. These guidelines would set the standards for review of proposed alterations or infill by the Coamission or Board. Page 48 B. Provisions of a Local ordinance The implementation of an historic preservation program is most commonly accomplished through the adoption of a local historic ordinance. This ordinance generally defines which resources in the City are considered historically significant or establishes a mechanism by which structures are designated as historic. The basic tenant of nay such ordinance is that historic buildings are a valuable community, resource and that changes affecting such buildings will be .subject to a design review process. The exact provisions of such ordinances vary according to local preferences, but generally cover the following concerns. 1. Establishment of a Board - The ordinance generally establishes a Cultural Heritage Board, or Heritage Commission to provide a design review function. Additionally, the duty of the Cultural Heritage Board or Heritage Commission is to designate historic structures in accord with the procedures set forth in the ordinance. 2. Qualifications - Most ordinances require that a certain number of the members represent related professions such as architecture, law, planning, history, or real estate. 3. Terms - The ordinance will specify the length of service for Board establish limits (if any) on the number of consecutive terms, and define overlapping terms of service, if desired. 4. Staff, - Most cities find that the Board functions more smoothly if a specific staff member is assigned.to serve as administrative staff. 5. Authority - This section authorizes the Board or Commission power to regulate construction, remodeling, alteration and demolition of the visible portion of historic buildings and to designate historic landmarks and districts. 6. Submissions - Some ordinances specify what materials must be submitted with requests for a review by the Board. Such materials may include building plans, elevations, photographs, etc. 7. . Board Action - The ordinance will identify what actions the Board may take (approval, denial, approval with conditions, etc.) and the time limits within..- which the owner must act. 8. Follow-UP - Many ordinances do not provide follow-up procedures, however, these can be effective in assuring that Board requests are met, particularly if the ordinance specifies penalties for non-compliance. 9. Demolition Delays - Most ordinances allow the Board to delay demolition from 3 to 12 months while alternatives are sought, such as a purchaser for a threatened structure or a lot to which the structure may be moved. 10. Maintenance - Most ordinances require the maintenance and repair of Page 49 historic properties to preclude the possibility that an owner will neglect a structure to the degree that it cannot be restored. 11. Anne 1a Most ordinances allow individuals to appeal the decision of the Board to another City Board, such as the Planning Cc mnission or City Council. Any of these provisions can be tailored to the local needs of the community. Therefore, Huntington Beach should carefully consider the most effective way to integrate this process into existing City plans and programs bef ore designing an ordinance. Page 50 C. MAW J abing and lyaintaining Districts and Landmarks All federal incentives for historic preservation (discussed in Section VI. D) are linked to the listing of structures or districts on the National Register of Historic Places. The procedures for such a listing are lengthy and time consuming, however the benefits are substantial. There are two different mechanism under which districts or landmarks may be submitted for review and approval. All applications under either mechanism are reviewed by State staff at the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) and by the National Park Service (NPS) staff. The two mechanisms were previously discussed in conjunction with the description of the National Register District and the Certified Local Historic District. The National Register Historic District may be nominated by an individual, a city or a group of property owners and no more than 50% of the property owners within the district may object to the nomination without voiding the application. OHP will hold a public information hearing at the district location and a public hearing will be held by the State Historic Resources Commission before approval can be granted. If approved, the nomination is forwarded to the Keeper of the National Register in Washington for listing. For a Certified Local District, the City mast first adopt a local ordinance which is certified by the Secretary of the Interior. Applications for local districts may then be filed with the local jurisdiction and are subject to whatever public hearing process is established by that ordinance. Approved districts are reviewed by the OHP staff and submitted to the NPS without further public hearings or specific requirements. for owner consent. For a local district which is not to be listed on the National Register, whatever procedures are established by the local ordinance will apply. Although less prestigious than the National Register Districts, local districts can provide eligibility for local incentive programs, can offer local recognition, and can be an important mechanisms in the revitalization of neighborhoods. The historic character and quality of a district is maintained both by regulation which rewire specific actions and by local and federal incentive programs which encourage certain actions. Various existing and recommended incentive programs are described in Section VI. D. and regulations are described below. State and federal environmental review processes require that impacts upon historic sites, structures, and districts be evaluated for any project requiring environmental review. mile this process will identify potential impacts, decisionmakers may choose to proceed with approval of the project where over-riding considerations are present. Further, many actions which are permitted under existing zoning will not require an environmental review at all. Thus, environmental regulations do not fully protect the integrity of a site or the quality of a district. On the National level, there is no requirement for a review of proposed Page 51 changes to historic properties, -.even if the property to be altered is listed on the National Register. A design review of proposed changes is required only if the property owner wishes to utilize the tax incentives available. Because the national design review process is one based solely on incentives, not requirements, it is recommended that the City designate all historic landmarks and districts on the local level, even when these areas.�qualify for .listing in the National Register without such local recognition. A, local design review process established by a local ordinance provides the best regulation available for maintaining the character of historic buildings and the-quality of historic districts. 'Y Page 52 D. InoMtive Programs The role of an incentive program is to make revitalization of an existing building cost effective in comparison with new construction. Federal tax incentive programs, initiated in 1976 and expanded with the Economic Recovery Act of 1981, have made sweeping changes in the tax laws. A number of local programs may also be instituted to supplement the federal programs. 1. Federal Tax Incentives With the Economic Recovery Act of 1981, Congress provided a clear incentive which makes qualified rehabilitation of historic properties financially competitive with new construction. Current versions of the 1986 Tax Reform Act retain the basic incentives of the 1981 Act, with minor changes, discussed below. Investment Tax Credit: The Investment Tax Credit (ITC) program allows a deduction taken directly against inoome taxes owed (not an income deduction) for a portion of qualified rehabilitation costs. The maximum tax credit (currently 25$, expected to be 20% under the Tax Reform Act) is available to depreciable certified historic structures both non-residential and residential (rental property) . Eligibility for this tax credit requires that the property be listed on the National Register or be a contributor to a historic district and that the rehab work be approved and meet certain cost minimums. Two lesser forms of tax credits are currently available which provide a 158 .credit for buildings which are not of historic importance but are at least 30 years old and 20% for structures at least 40 years old. The Tax Reform Act is expected to reduce this to a single category: 10% for non-historic structures over 50 years old. Adjustment to Basis: As an added bonus, the 1981 Act allows owners of historic properties to depreciate 100% of their rehabilitation costs, even though part of these costs were credited. Owners of non-historic buildings may depreciate only the balance not used in the tax credit. Easements: An easement is a legal agreement between a property owner and the holder of the easement which governs the current and future owners' treatment of the property. An easement allows the exchange of an interest in the property which is less than outright ownership. The most commonly used easement for historic properties, called a facade easement, is, in effect, an exchange of unused air rights and a protection of the historic face of the building in return for tax benefits. The facade easement restricts the development and appearance of the property to its historic level. The difference in value between this existing development and that permitted under local zoning is the value of the easement. The easement can provide federal tax benefits as a charitable deduction (as long as donations are deductible) or can provide local property tax benefits if the property is assessed at its reduced value. Page 53 2. Local Incentives Existing programs that Huntington Beach has instituted for housing upkeep or rehabilitation are a prime source for local financial incentives, if these can be targeted to historic structures. Particularly where historic buildings are located in prime comercial areas (of which Huntington Beach has very few) , many cities have combined these low interest loan programs with design assistance provided by a consultant under contract to the City. Santa Ana, Fullerton, the Fairfax area of L.A. and other cities have seen major revitalization of these areas in a fairly short period of time with this combined approach. Local planning and building codes can discourage upgrading older buildings by requiring additional changes to meet current code standards. With the passage of SB 2321 effective in 1985, the State extended the provisions of its Historic Building Code to designated historic buildings throughout the state. This code allows for alternative treatments of historic buildings that are less restrictive than the Uniform Building Code, but that still maintain life safety. Any building in Huntington Beach designated as historic by local ordinance or resolution, would be eligible to utilize this code. Page 54 VII. AIMS The. historic resources inventory for the City of Huntington Beach has located 556 pre-1946 structures in the Downtown Study Area. Of these, 103 are considered potential landmarks and another 115 are located within potential historic districts. (29 buildings are both landmarks and are located in a potential district) . This comprehensive process of reviewing all resources, prioritizing their importance, and selecting groupings is the primary value of the study. Utilizing a comprehensive windshield survey at the outset assures City officials and staff that any resultant policy decisions are based on a knowledge of all of the resources remaining within the study area. Therefore the likely consequences of preservation policies or programs can be considered in advance. This survey has been focused solely on the area defined as the Downtown Study Area. Remaining areas of the City should also be inventoried to complete the process. Finally, with the active redevelopment program being initiated in the Downtown area, the City urgently needs to consider the place of historic resources in its future. Depending on the action to be taken (information, policy, ordinance, overlay zone) , other studies or planning documents are needed to establish a preservation programs. These may include: - Public Information Documents - possibly describing the historic resources in the City, the benefits of National Register listing, and the process for preparing an application; - A General Plan Element or Amendment - defining policies for preserving historic resources and naming these resources or the criteria by which resources will be considered significant; - An Historic Preservation Ordinance - establishing regulatory mechanisms to provide protection of historic resources and establishing mechanisms by which historic resources are designated; - A Zoning Code Amendment - creating an historic overlay zone for areas designated as historic districts; - A Main Street Historic District Plan - defining the actions needed for National Register listing of the District, establishing design standards, defining buildings to be relocated to this area, and detailing the ultimate appearance of this key district; - Design Guidelines - establishing principals for rehabilitation of historic structures and compatible new infill in districts for use by the Design Review Board or other body created by ordinances. I Page 55 r APPENDIX A SA m FM BACK RATING State of California—The Resources Agency SAMPLE INVENTORY FORM DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION _ Coc A-RATED BUILDING HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY IDENTIFICATION U.S. Post Office 1. Common name: 2. Historic name: U.S. Post Office 3. Street or rural address. 316 Olive City. Huntington Beach Zip 92648 County Orange 4. Parcel number: 024-14-04 5. Present Owner: Address: City Zip Ownership is: Public Private 8. Present Use: Post Office Original use: Post Office DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: Siiltple Spanish Colonial with Modern Tendencies 7b. Briefly describe the present physical description of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its origin- ' -nndition: A rounded stucco-clad cornice crowns this two-story, flat-roofed rectangular stucco-clad Post Office building. A second row of cornice molding runs below the plain frieze with letters which read "U. S. Polgt Office, Huntington Beach, California. " The main floor of the building is feet off the ground and is reached by a set of steps on the north end of the Olive Street side. A concrete surround of quoins with a large, plain panel above, accents the main entry. The metal and glass doors and transom are new. A roar of three large recessed 8-over-8 double-hung windows occupy the south end of the front facade. A wide band of red brick, with an arched recessed stucco panel above, surrrounds each window. Stucco wainscotting forms a band around the foundationof the building. The corner stone says "Henry Rosenthall Jr . , Secretary of the Treasury; . James Farley, Attorney General ; Louis A, Simon, Supervising Architect; and Neal Melick, Supervising Engineer, 1935. Two rows of 6-over-6 recess( double-hung windows face the side yard on the south side, while a' row of 0 I 8. Construction date: 1935 Estimated Factual 9. Architect LmAs A. Sim)n - 10. Builder L.F. Dow rn of T.pa Angel ac 11. Approx. praipf v size (in feet),11 7.5, Frontage Depth or approx. acreage I 12. Date(s) of enclosed photograph(s) �. " 3/86 316 Olive 7b. Physical Description_=<Cont. ) 12-over-12 double-hung windows face the north. Two small windows , located near the roof line, are outlined with molding. The back contains two more 12-over-12 windows and a covered platform. A 13. Condition: Excellent _._Good X Fair _. Deteriorated No longer in existence 14. Alterations: Doors and Tiansoms 15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) Open land _Scattered buildings _ Densely built-up . Residential Industrial Commercial X Other: 16. Threats to site: None known_Private dev� gnt,.i�mZeann�g Vandalism Public Works project Other: VVGG11��YY 17. Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown? 18. Related features: None SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) Louis A. Simon, supervising architect for this building, is well- known for his elegant but simple public buildings . His most famous design is that of the Federal Building and Post Office, now the U. S. Federal Courthouse in the Downtown Civic Center of Los Angeles. HE also designed the Canoga Park Post Office in 1938, the Whittier Post Office in. 1935 and others . His worki is mentioned three times in Robert Winter' s Architecture in Los Angeles (Peregrine-Smith Books , Salt Lake City- 1985) . The people of Huntington Beach are proud of their Post Office and feel that it is significant not only architect- urally, but also as a functioning and significant community entity. Locational sketch map (draw and label site and surrounding streets, roads, and prominent landmarks): 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is NORTH checked, number in order of importance.) Architecture Arts& Leisure . Economic/Industrial -._ Exploration/Settlement y, Government Military co uo 419 Religion Social/Education ��e Q a» a17 ate j �� 90 411 7 21. Sources (List books,documents, surveys, personal interviews ��1 s �r 424 42 2 and their dates). 401 421 i National Archives Contract 410 Documents 0 W 22. Date form prepa�ed 2�86 JoF o 9�° Y . s Fi By (name) By (name)anizati rtie tree ec s, c. J Addres NewportNZI v ,� rs City �ewport Beacti Zip 92663 Phone: - 2643 -- - 11 J1> Historical Researchers: Barbara Milkovich Jerry Person r�s G �\Q� �l �ji�/� Jo State of California—The Resources Agency SAMPLE INVENTORY FORM DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION _ Loc HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY B-RATED BUILDING IDENTIFICATION Merrilee' s 1. Common name: 2. Historic name Tripp' s Market Building .: 3. Street or rural address: 124 Main Street City Huntington Beach Zip 92648 County Orange 4. Parcel number: 04-154-02 5. Present Owner: Charles Sarrabere & Blanche Wood Address: 201 5th St. City Huntington Beach Zip 92648 X Ownership is: Public Private 6. Present Use: Clothing store original use: Retail-commercial DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural style: Moderne 7b. Briefly describe the present physical description of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its origii- ' rnndition: Moderne in style, the single-story flat-roofed building shown below was originally a Western Falsefront building with a frame body. The gabled section behind the falsefront was and is still clad in corrugated metal while the front was clad in stucco as part of. the Moderne remodel in the early 1930' s . Projectiong fluted pilasters accent each corner of the front facade, with a wide stucco band running parallel to the top of the unbroken parapet. Below the sign "Merrilee' s" another band of stucco forms a beltcourse above the row of vertical wood- framed transom windows . Large plate glass windows with glass sides slanting toward the centered wood doors form the storefront. The bulkheads are clad in flagstone, added in the 50's, and a semi-circular canvas awning, a recent addition, shelters the doors. The rear view shows a gable-roofed structure, clad in corrugated metal:, with the gable facing to the rear. A long, narrow, single-story stucco-clad addition extends almost to the rear of the lot. I 1 8. Construction date: 1912 Estimated Factual 9. Architect Owner maw �► Owner 10. Builder 11. Approx. pr�p sty size (in feet Frontage L� Depth 17 . 5 ' or approx. acreage 12. Date(s) of enclosed photograph(s) 10/.85 MUM 13. Condition: Excellent --Good X Fair _. Deteriorated No longer in existence 14. Alterations: Flagstone on bulkheads and canopy 15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if r,:cessary) Open land _Scattered buildings Densely built-up . Residential Industrial . Commercial X Other: 16. Threats to site: None known_Private development Zoning Vandalism Public Works project Other: Redevelopment 17: Is the structure: On its original site? X Moved? Unknown? 16. Related features: None SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates, events,and persons associated with the site.) Remodeled in the early 30 ' s from a Western- storefront style, Merrilee ' s retains nmost of the Moderne features of that era. The transoms and pilasters form the major horizontal and vertical lines . This was the first location of O' Barr' s Drug Store in 1914, before they built the large two-story brick building on the corner of Main and P.C.H. The U. S. Restaurant was there in 1919 and the early Twenties papers list the following occupants : Huntington Beach Stock Exchange;Fowler' s Paint, Paper, and Variety Store, Lynn Colburn Real Estate; Model Tailors ; and Economy Market . The Buc�horn Cafe and 20/30 Cafe were there in 1939 and 1943 . The building is significant for its contribution to the broad patterns of the City' s history and association with businessmen who contributed much to the Citv' s enconomv, Q. of �1s Jp1 20, Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is checked, number in order of importance.) Architecture 2 Arts& Leisure Economic/Industrial .._ Exploration/Settlement Government Military Religion Social/Education s� L^ 21. Sources (List books,documents, surveys, personal interviews and their dates). 1 J. s 22. Date form prepared 2/86 By (name) D. Marsh r Organization. Thirtieth Street Architects,Inc Address: 2821 Newport Blvd. n ti b City N ort BeachZip _oO Phone: — QS+A ,bP Historical Researc ..ers: b�{ Barbafa Milkovich Jerry Person �� I State of California—The Resources Agency SAMPLE INVENTORY FORM DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION C-RATED BUILDING — hoc HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTOR IDENTIFICATION 1. Common name: 2. Historic name: 3. Street or rural address: 405 Tenth Street Citti Huntington Beach Zip 92648 County Orange 4. Parcel number: 024-105-17 5. Present Owner: Lewis B. Armstrong Address:: 405 .10th Street City Huntington Beach Zip 92648 Ownership is: Public Private X 6. Present Use: Residence Original use: Residence DESCRIPTION 7a. Architectural sty,le: .Cr' aftsman Bungalow ; 7b. Briefly describe the present physical,description of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its origin-' rnndition:. Mature trees shade the single-story Craftsman Bungalow•:at 405 loth St.. The wide, low-pitched front-facing gabled roof. is: acc,ented by single exposed beam ends and rafter tails . The eaves have a wide overhang. Horizontal lath strips with widely-spaced vertical lath cover the offset front gable face of the porch. A pergola continues to the east from the porch and shades the rest of the front facade. The porch and pergola are supported by narrow wood posts . The house is now covered with asbestos shingles. The porch railing, made .of plain balusters , is not original. A large plate glass window, topped by a leaded glass transom shares the porch with the front door. A pair of multi-paned french doors is located in the center and has another large .plate glass window and intricate leaded glass transom on its east side. Double-hung windows are used throughout the house. Most of the doors and windows on the front. facade do not appear to be original to this house, with its late Craftsman-style roof line. ( r iAP B. Construction date: 1917 Estimated Factual r` 9. Architect Unknown A, - d 10. Builder Unknown r y+l • r / 11. Approx. prosp size (in feft111 7 r 5„ Frontage Depth a ' or approx. acreage r 12. Date(s) of enclosed photograph(s) 9/85 77 ---.: 13. Condition: Excellent __.Good X Fair Deteriorated No longer in existence 14. Alterations: Windows , front raili hg, asbestos shingles , french doors . 15. Surroundings: Check more than one if necessary) Open land _Scattered buildings Densely built-up Residential Industrial Commercial Other: 16. Threats to site: None known—Private development X Zoning Vandalism Public Works project Other: 17. Is the structure: On its original site? Moved? Unknown? X 1.8. Related features- Mature trees SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates,events,and persons associated with the site.) This building retains much of its architectural integrity and contributes to the architectural and historical streetscape of the City of Huntington Beach. Collectively, these buildings reflect the broad patterns of history that shaped the seaside, oil-production ca munity. r6 v� \2 vr? ar fOy J p v 01 S° 1 vo� 20. Main theme of the historic resource: (If more than one is 'ivr', vOr vvv�O v v v�' s s checked, number in order of importance.) Architecture 1 Arts& Leisure v°v v°9r� V Economic/Industrial _ Exploration/Settlement rtp v1D v, q Government Military s vOc Religion _ Social/Education vrv-9 s r r e s \\ Jr° 64 Jar q vrr 21. Sources (List books,documents, surveys, personal interviews and their dates). 6 0 s ors rs d ° v a� so s s, � v r1 ✓, ov s vOv vr�D s J�r�9 r� V SOS 22. Date form prepared 6/86 ,`•l` �d os sr� By (name) D. Marsh OrganizationTl''irti eth Street Arrhi tenug Tnr• �r`i6 ~� so sls Address: 2821 Newport Blvd. —_ woe° �s�a City NqD ort Beach zip 92663 rs •t' ��e ''Or �O Phone (71 673-2643 _ �'� ��v, s'ry �r1 r1 r 1r� s 11 J rB� ors � ? •�° °'r9 APPWIB B A AND BPMW SWOMUES WITH= THE OCNPLM Dokma= SAY ABSA (Lake Street to ODIdaaiest Street) I I I i i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 118 3RD STREET COMMERCIAL MINOR 1915 B 221 3RD STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL NONE 1905 B 303 3RD STREET SPANISH COLONIAL NONE 1925 A 310 3RD STREET 1880'S COTTAGE MODERATE 1880 B 121 5TH STREET COMMERCIAL/THEATRE MODERATE 1922 B 122 5TH STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL NONE 1935 B 204 5TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1908 A 210 5TH STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1924 B 311 5TH STREET ZIGZAG MODERNE NONE 1930 B- 128 6TH STREET VICTORIAN-EASTLAKE MODERATE 1890'S A 401 6TH STREET GOTHIC PERIOD MODERATE 1909 A 603 6TH STREET PERIOD REVIVAL MINOR 1928 B 111-115 7TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1910'S B- 124 7TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1920 B- 326 7TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL MINOR 1910'S B- 401-403 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN APARTMENTS MODERATE 1920'S B 428 7TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL MINOR 1910'S B 301 8TH STREET PERIOD REVIVAL MINOR 1928 B 421 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920'S A 618-620 BTH STREET MODERNE - DUPLEX MINOR 1930'S B- 201 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1910 B 211 9TH STREET VICTORIAN-EASTLAKE MINOR 1900'S B 215 9TH STREET QUEEN ANNE COTTAGE MINOR 1930'S B 217 9TH STREET QUEEN ANNE COTTAGE MINOR 1900'S B 319 10TH STREET VICTORIAN MINOR 1908 B 321 LOTH STREET SPANISH CHURCH MODERATE 1920'S B 403 lOTH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1907 B 416 LOTH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920'S B 420 LOTH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920'S A 225 11TH STREET CRAFTSMAN NONE 1905 B 318 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1905 B- 357 11TH STREET LOG CABIN MINOR 1935 B 412 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1905 B 426 11TH STREET CRAFTSMAN CHURCH MINOR 1938 B 509 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL NONE 1904 8 601 11TH STREET MISSION REV STORE MINOR 1915 B- 702 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MODERATE 1910 B 216 CREST AVENUE TUDOR REVIVAL UNALTERED 1928 A 306 & 310 CREST AVENUE CRAFTS. BUNG. UNALTERED 1915 B 307 CREST AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1910 A 311 CREST AVENUE COLONIAL REVIVAL UNALTERED 1920 B 330 CREST AVENUE SPANISH COLONIAL MINIMUM 1928 B 505 LAKE STREET CRAFTSMAN NONE 1915 B 729 LAKE STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1915 A 1970 LAKE STREET 30'S METAL INDUST. MINOR 1930'S B 1980 LAKE STREET 30'S METAL INDUST. MINOR 1930'S B j 1988 _LAKE STREET 30'S METAL INDUST. MINOR 1930_ B _ 101-109-1/2 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1915 B 111-113 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1925 B 112-114 MAIN STREET BRICK COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1915 B 115 MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK COM MINOR 1916 B 119-121 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1920 B+ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 122 MAIN STREET EARLY COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1905 A 123 MAIN STREET EARLY COMMERCIAL SUBSTANTIAL 1923 B- 124 MAIN STREET MODERNE MODERATE 1910 B 126 MAIN STREET _ZIGZAG MODERNE MODERATE 1935 A 205 MAIN STREET ZIGZAG MODERNE MINOR 1930 B 207 MAIN STREET EARLY THEATRE MODERATE 1910 B 215 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 B 217 MAIN STREET WESTERN FALSEFRONT MODERATE 1904 B 222-222 1.12 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 B 224 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1925 B 226 MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK COMMER MINOR 1920 B 228 MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK COMMER MINOR 1920 A 410 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 B 424 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1920 B 609 MAIN STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1903 B 627 MAIN STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1930 B 717 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 1910 B+ 726 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 1910 B 731 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 1910 B 735 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 1910 B 738-740 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1908 B+ 806 MAIN STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL NONE 1905 B 810 MAIN STREET SPANISH COLONIAL NONE 1925 B 814-816 MAIN STREET BUNGALOW COURT NONE 1910 B 815 MAIN STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1905 B 1905 MAIN STREET MEDITERRANEAN NONE 1926 A 316 OLIVE AVENUE MODERNE MODERATE 1935 A 411 OLIVE AVENUE MODERNE _ MODERATE 1935 B 1213 OLIVE AVENUE N_EO-CLASSICAL MINOR 1900'S B PR 414 ORANGE AVENUE AIRIE STYLE APTS NO 1915 B- 110 PACIFIC COAST CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 1910 B 114 PACIFIC COAST CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 1905 A 304 PACIFIC COAST SPANISH COLONIAL REV MODERATE 1930 A 306 PACIFIC COAST SPANISH COLONIAL REV MINOR 1929 A 319 PACIFIC COAST MODERNE MINOR 1930 B 520 PACIFIC COAST TRANSITIONAL MINOR 1910 B BAIT SHOP PACIFIC COAST ZIGZAG MODERNE NONE B CORNERSTONE PACIFIC COAST NONE 1914 B PIER ENTRAN PACIFIC COAST ZIGZAG MODERNE NONE 1930 B PIER SHOPS PACIFIC COAST ZIGZAG MODERNE NONE 1930 B 814 PALM AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 B 900 PALM AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1920 B 1502 PALM AVENUE ZIGZAG MODERNS UNALTERED 1933 A 1600 tb? PALM AVENUE NED-CLASSICAL UNALTERED 1931 A 1817 PARK STREET SPANISH COLONIAL UNALTERED 1925 A 311 WALNUT AVENUE 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1920 B 412-414 WALNUT AVENUE 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1925 B 513-519 WALNUT AVENUE WESTERN FALSEFRONT NONE 1904 A 716-718 WALNUT AVENUE PERIOD REV. TRIPLEX UNALTERED 1925 B 300 YORKTOWN GREEK REVIVAL HOUSE MINIMUM 1875 A 333 YORKTOWN EARLY FARM HOUSE MINIMUM 1905 B APPMIK C WII��I�n Smmu OF CITY OF PJNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 112-114-116 2ND STREET 40'S BUNGALOW COURT REPAIRS NEED 1940 D 127 2ND STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1915 C 208 2ND STREET CALIF BUNGALOW NONE 1920 D 215 2ND STREET 40'S RANCH MINOR 1940'S D 222 2ND STREET 40'S RANCH COTTAGE MINOR 1940 D 230 2ND STREET 40'S RANCH COURT MINOR 1940 C 309 2ND STREET 40'S RANCH NONE 1940 C 310 2ND STREET 40'S RANCH NONE 1940 D 312 2ND STREET 40'S RANCH NONE 1940 C- 313 2ND STREET 40'S RANCH SUBSTANTIAL 1940 D 316-318 2ND STREET 40'S RANCH DUPLEX NONE 1940 D 317 2ND STREET 40'S RANCH NONE 1940 D 321 2ND STREET 40'S RANCH MINOR 1940 C- 431-435 2ND STREET CRAFTSMAN COURT MINOR 1910'S C i �I 1 CITY OF InUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 115-117 3RD STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 C 118 3RD STREET COMMERCIAL MINOR 1915 8 122 3RD STREET BUNGALOW COURT MODERATE 1920 D 220 3RD STREET 40'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1940 C- 221 3RD STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL NONE 1905 8 303 3RD STREET SPANISH COLONIAL NONE 1925 A 310 3RD STREET 1880'S COTTAGE MODERATE 1880 B 318 3RD STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MODERATE 1920 C- 320 3RD STREET VERNACULAR COTTAGE MODERATE 1890 C 405 3RD STREET CALIF BUNGALOW NONE 1925 C 407 3RD STREET 30'S COTTAGE NONE 1930 C 409 3RD STREET 40'S RANCH NONE 1942 C CITY OF KUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 121 5TH STREET COMMERCIAL/THEATRE MODERATE 1922 B 122 5TH STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL NONE 1935 B 204 5TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1908 A 206 5TH STREET QUEEN ANNE COTTAGE MINOR 1900 C 210 5TH STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1924 B 214 5TH STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1925 C+ 215 5TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW SUBSTANTIAL 1904 D- 218-220 5TH STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 C- 225 5TH STREET, 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1930 C- 301 5TH STREET BRICK GAS STATION 1925 C- 305 5TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MODERATE 1920 D 311 57H STREET ZIGZAG MODERNE NONE 1930 B- 313 5TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1915 C 317 5TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 1910 C 321 5TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1900 C 328 5TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1928 C 412 5TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 1910 C 613 5TH STREET COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1930'S D CITY OF RUNTINGTON, BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 125 6TH STREET COTTAGE/BUNGALOW SUBSTANTIAL. 1930 D 128 6TH STREET VLCTORIAN-EASTLAKE MODERATE 1890'S A 211 6TH STREET 40'S RANCH . . MINOR 1940'S C 215 6TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 1910 C 217 6TH STREET NED-CLASSICAL MODERATE 1920'S D 220 6TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL MODERATE 1920,'S D 223 6TH STREET SHINGLE STYLE MODERATE 1900 C+ 308 6TH STREET CRAFTSMAN COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 310-312 6TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1912 C+ 313 67H STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C. 317 6TH STREET COLONIAL. REVIVAL MINOR I910,. C: 323-327 6TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1:921; C+ 328 6TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINOR 1922; C 401 6TH STREET. GOTHIC. PERIOD. MODERATE 1.909: A, 409 6TH STREET CRAFTSMAN COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 411 6TH STREET CRAFTSMAN COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 415 6TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 19201S C+ 421 6TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL REPAIRS NEED 1910'S C- 423 67H .S7REE7 NED-CLASSICAL REPAIRS NEED 1910'S C 501 6TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL REPAIRS NEED 1910'S C 509 6TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 1920'S C 515 6TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 19101S C 519 6TH STREET EARLY FARMHOUSE MODERATE 190019 C . 603 6TH STREET PERIOD REVIVAL MINOR 1928 B CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 111-115 7TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR' 1910'S B- 121 7TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW SUBSTANTIAL 1920 C 123 7TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1910'S C 124 7TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1920 B- 126 7TH STREET (DUPLE)() MINOR 1930'S C 127 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 215 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 19201S C 311 77H STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1925 C 312 7TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1910'S C 316 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MODERATE LATE 20' C 317 7TH STREET PERIOD REVIVAL MINOR LATE 20' C+ 320 7TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR LATE 20' C 322 7TH STREET COTTAGE MODERATE LATE 20' C 326 7TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL MINOR 1910'S B- 401-403 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN APARTMENTS MODERATE 1920'S B 402 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 406 7TH STREET NED-CLASSICAL MINOR 19101'S C 410 7TH STREET FARMHOUSE MODERATE 1920 C 412 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920 C 416 7TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW SUBSTANTIAL 1920 D 422 7TH STREET RANCH MINOR 1930'S D 423 7TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL SUBSTANTIAL 1920'S D 427 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 428 7TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL MINOR 1910'S B 503 7TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1920 C+ 504 77H STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW SEVERE 1920 D 506 7TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL MODERATE 1910'S C 508 7TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL MINOR 1910'S C 510 7TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 514 7TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 523 7TH S7REE7 COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S D 526 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW SUBSTANTIAL EARLY 20 D 527 7TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 601 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920 C 605 7TH STREET COTTAGE (TINY) MINOR 1920 C 607 77H STREET COTTAGE (TINY) MINOR 1920 D 609 7TH .STREET COTTAGE MINOR 19101S C 613 7TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 617 7TH STREET COTTAGE. MINOR 1920'S C 619 7TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 627 7TH STREET RANCH MINOR 1940'S C CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 112 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN SEVERE 1920'S C 115 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920'S C 116 8TH STREET NED-CLASSICAL MINOR 1910'S C 123 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920'S C+ 125 8TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1920'S C 206 8TH STREET 40'S RANCH MINOR 1940'S C 209 8TH STREET FARMHOUSE MINOR 1910'S C 212 87H STREET NED-CLASSICAL MODERATE 1910'S C 214 8TH STREET APARTMENT BLDG MINOR LATE 20' D 215 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 19201S C+ 220 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 227 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 19201S C+ 301 8TH STREET PERIOD REVIVAL MINOR 1928 8 315 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 317-19 8TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1920'S D 318 8TH STREET EARLY COTTAGE MINOR 1910'S D 322 8TH STREET EARLY COTTAGE MINOR 1910'S C 327 8TH STREET EARLY COTTAGE MINOR 1910'S D 404 8TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 408 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MAJOR 1910'S D 409 8TH STREET TRANSITIONAL MODERATE 1910'S C 411 8TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL MODERATE 1910'S C 412 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S D 413 8TH STREET 40'S RANCH MODERATE 1940'S D 421 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920'S A 422-424 87H STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1930'S C 426 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 19201S C+ 501 8TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 506 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920'S D 510 8TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 514 8TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 515 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 518 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 521 8TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 527 BTH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 601 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 19201S C+ 605 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 609 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 610 8TH STREET EARLY COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 613 8TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 614 8TH STREET COTTAGE SUBSTANTIAL 1910'S D 618-620 8TH STREET MODERNE - DUPLEX MINOR 1930'S B- 619 8TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 621 87H STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 622 8TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 627 8TH STREET VICTORIAN SUBSTANTIAL 1900'S C CITY OF HQNTINGTON 'BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 115 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 201 97H STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1910 B 206 9TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MAJOR 1910'S D 207 97H STREET EARLY COTTAGE MINOR 1910'S D 211 9TH STREET VICTORIAN-EASTLAKE MINOR 1900'S B 215 . 9TH STREET QUEEN ANNE COTTAGE MINOR 1930'S B 216 9TH STREET EARLY FARMHOUSE SEVERE 1910'S D 217 974 STREET QUEEN ANNE COTTAGE MINOR 1900'S B 219 9TH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL MINOR 1910'S C 221 9TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1920'S C 224 9TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 227 9TH STREET PERIOD REVIVAL MINOR 1930'S C 310 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1925 C 311 9TH STREET ' COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S C 314 9TH STREET EARLY COTTAGE MINOR 1910'S C 315-317 97H STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1920'S C 318 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 320 9TH STREET CRAFTSTMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C .321 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 323 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 324 9TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1920'S D 327 9TH STREET- CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 404 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 405 9TH STREET EARLY COTTAGE MINOR 1910'S C 406 9TH STREET EARLY COTTAGE MINOR 1900'S C 407 9TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1920'S C 410 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920'S C 411 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920'S C 412 9TH STREET COTTAGE - TINY MINOR 1920'S C 414 9TH STREET COTTAGE - TINY MINOR 1940'S C 415 9TH STREET PERIOD REVIVAL MINOR 1930'S C+ 416 9TH STREET COTTAGE - TINY MODERATE 1920'S D 418-420 9TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1920 C 419 9TH- STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920 C 421-423 9TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1920 C 422 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920 C 427 9TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1920 C 502 9TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MAJOR 1920 D 505 97H STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR .1920 C 506 97H STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920 C 507 97H STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MAJOR 1920'S D 508 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920 C 509-511 9TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MODERATE 1920 C 510 9TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW SUBSTANTIAL 1920 D 524 9TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MODERATE 1907 C 602 9TH STREET PERIOD REVIVAL MINOR 1920'S C 610 9TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW SUBSTANTIAL 1920'S C 614 97H STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S D 616 9TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 618 9TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 620 9TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR . 1920'S C CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 122 10TH STREET PERIODzREV-IVAL MINOR- 1930'S C 208 10TH STREET COTTAGE MODERATE 11920'S D 220 10TH-STREET COTTAGE- MODERATE.. -- 1920'S C 222 10TH STREET COTTAGE MODERATE 1920'S D 228 10TH STREET 'CALIF `BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S D 319 10TH STREET VICTORIAN MINOR 1908 B 320 10TH STREET CRAFTSMAN 'BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S `C 321 107H STREET SPANISH CHURCH MODERATE 1920'S B 403 10T14 STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1907 Is 405 10TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S -C 414 10TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1920'S D 416 10TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 19-20'S B 419 LOTH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 19,20'S 'D 420 10TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920'S A 501 10TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920':S• C+ 507 10TH STREET 40'S- RANCH MINOR �1940'S C 509 LOTH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1920'S C+ 517 10TH STREET EARLY COTTAGE MODERATE 1920'S --D 518 LOTH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW- MINOR 1920'S -C- 520 10TH- STREET EARLY COTTAGE 'MODERATE 1920'S D 521 10TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 601' LOTH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL SUBSTANTIAL 1910'S ID 605 10TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MAJOR 1920'S ,D 611 i0TH STREET COTTAGE MAJOR 1920'S 'D 612 LOTH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1920'S C 814-616 LOTH STREET COTTAGE - TINY , SUBSTANTIAL -1920 - D 617 LOTH STREET EARLY COTTAGE SUBSTANTIAL -19.10'S D 618 10TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 19.20 C 621 10TH STREET CRAFTSMAN 'BUNGALOW REPAIRS NEED 1.920'S Z 622 LOTH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR -1920'.S iD 623 LOTH STREET EARLY ZOTTAGE REPAIRS NEED 1920'S C 628 10TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C+ 701 LOTH STREET CRAFTSMAN MODERATE _1910 - C+ 705 LOTH STREET NEO-CLASSICAL MINOR 191-01-S C- 707 10TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1915 C 709 10TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MODERATE 1912 C 912 107H STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL• UNALTERED 1910 C+ 920 10TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1915 C 928 10TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1915 C 931 10TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL UNALTERED 1925 C+ 933 10TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1920 D 935 LOTH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1920 D 936 10TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINIMUM 1912 - C+ CITY OF !iUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 214 11TH STREET COTTAGE MOJOR 1920'S D 225 11TH STREET CRAFTSMAN NONE 1905 B 305 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1907 C 313 11TH STREET VERNACULAR MAJOR 1920'S D 318 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1905 B- 320 11TH STREET CRAFTSMAWSPAN COL MINOR 1915 C 323 11TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1910 D 328 11TH STREET VERNACULAR MAJOR 1920'S D 357 11TH STREET LOG CABIN MINOR 1935 B 404 11TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1910 C+ 406 11TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 1910 C 408 11TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW SUBSTANTIAL 1915 C- 410 11TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MAJOR 1910 D 412 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1905 B 426 11TH STREET CRAFTSMAN CHURCH MINOR 1938 B 502 11TH STREET 20'S COTTAGE MINOR 1922 C 509 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL NONE 1904 8 510 11TH STREET 20'S COTTAGE MINOR 1920 D 511 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1905 C 512 11TH STREET COTTAGE MOJOR 1920'S D 515 11TH STREET 40'S TRACT NONE 1940 C- 518 11TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1910 D 521 117H STREET CRAFTSMAN MODERATE 1908 D 522 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL SUBSTANTIAL 1910 D 524 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1.905 C- 528 11TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1915 C 601 11TH STREET MISSION REV STORE MINOR 1915 B- 614 i1TH STREET LATE CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920 C- 620 11TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1915 C= 621 11TH STREET 40'S MODERNE MINOR 1935 D 628 11TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW SUBSTANTIAL 1915 D 702 11TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MODERATE 1910 B 710 11TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MAJOR 1915 D 714 11TH STREET SPANISH ECLECTIC MINOR 1926 D 802 11TH STREET SPANISH ECLECTIC MINOR 1926 C 80.8 11TH STREET SPAINISH ECLECTIC MINOR 1926 C 81.2 11TH STREET SPANISH ECLECTIC MINOR 1926 C 816 11TH STREET SPAINISH ECLECTIC MINOR 1926 C 820 11TH STREET SPAINISH ECLECTIC MINOR 1926 C 828 11TH STREET SPAINISH ECLECTIC MINOR 1926 C 934 11TH STREET SPAINISH ECLECTIC MINOR 1926 C 952-954 11TH STREET SPANISH COL. DUPLEX MODERATE 1925 C I I i i I I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 201 12TH STREET COLONIAL MINOR 1915 C 213-215 12TH STREET SPAN. COL. DUPLEX NONE 1925 C 217 12TH STREET 30'S COTTAGE MINOR 1930 C- 220 12TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW REPAIRS NEED 1915 C- 221 12TH STREET COTTAGE MINOR 1910 C- 221 12TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 1920 C 227 12TH STREET 20'S CRAFTSMAN NONE 1920 C 303 12TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL SUBSTANTIAL 1905 C 311 12TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1925 D 312 12TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1905 C 313 12TH STREET VERNACULAR COTTAGE SUBSTANTIAL 1915 D 315 12TH STREET VERNACULAR COTTAGE SUBSTANTIAL 1915 D 317 12TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 1920 C 323 12TH STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1915 C 400 BLOCK 12TH STREET NONE 503 12TH STREET 40'S TRACT NONE 1930 C- 506 12TH STREET 40'S TRACT NONE 1930 C- 522 12TH STREET 40'S TRACT NONE 1930 C- 525 12TH STREET COTTAGE NONE 1930 C 606 12TH STREET CRAFTSMAN MODERATE 1920 C 610 12TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL SUBSTANTIAL 1920 D 619 12TH STREET 40'S RANCH SUBSTANTIAL 1925 D 620 12TH STREET 40'S TRACT NONE 1940 C- 623 12TH STREET 40'S TRACT NONE 1940 C- 626 12TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 1910 C 708 12TH STREET 40'S TRACT NONE 1940 C- 712 12TH STREET 40'S TRACT NONE 1940 C- 719 12TH STREET 40'S TRACT NONE 1940 C- 722 12TH STREET 40'S RANCH UNALTERED 1945 C 730 12TH STREET 40'S TRACT RANCH NONE 1940 C- 735 12TH STREET 40'S TRACT RANCH NONE 1940 C- 743 12TH STREET 40'S RANCH NONE 1940 C- . t CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY . STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 311 13TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 C 312 13TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 C 315 13TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MAJOR 1915 D 323 137H STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1935 D 805 13TH STREET 40'S SPAN. COLONIAL MINIMUM 1945 C i I I i I I i I I i I I i I CITY OF- KUNTINGTOK BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 618 14TH STREEET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1915 C+ 219 14TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MAJOR 1910 D 221 14TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINIMUM 1925 D 303 14TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1925 D 315 14TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1915 C- 407 14TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1915 D 427 14TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 C+ 504 14TH STREET 40'S RANCH UNALTERED 1945 C- 604 14TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL UNALTERED 1920 C 614-616 14TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1925 C- 724 14TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINIMUM 1925 D 726 14TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1935 D 735 (a) 14TH STREET MODERNE MINIMUM 1935 C { f • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 506 15TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1925 C 514-516 15TH STREET SPANISH COL. DUPLEX UNALTERED 1925 C 622-624 15TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MAJOR 1915 D CIT`( OF KUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 202 177H STREET 40`S TRACT UNALTERED 1945 D 221 17TH STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW DETERIORATED 1920 D 326 17TH STREET METAL BUILDING UNALTERED 1935 D 608 17TH STREET PRAIRIE MODERATE 1920 C ,;UNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY CITY OF ° STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 12.1 22ND STREET METAL INDUSTRIAL UNALTERED 1930 C CITY OF- Hl1NTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 714 ACACIA AVENUE WESTERN STOREFRONT MAJOR 1915 D 716 ACACIA AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1915 D 806 ACACIA AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1915 C 809 ACACIA AVENUE 'CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED '1915 C 908 ACACIA AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1910 D 910 ACACIA AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1910 C 912 ACACIA AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1915 D 914-916 ACACIA AVENUE SPANISH COL. DUPLEX MINIMUM 1925 C 1012 ACACIA AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 . D 1013 ACACIA AVENUE WESTERN STOREFRONT UNALTERED 1910 C 1014-1016 ACACIA AVENUE CAL. BUNGALOW DUPLEX MINIMUM 1925 C 1015-1017 ACACIA AVENUE CAL. BUNGALOW DUPLEX MINIMUM 1925 C 1106-1108 ACACIA AVENUE CAL. BUNGALOW DUPLEX MINIMUM 1925 C 1112 ACACIA AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 D 1114 ACACIA AVENUE CAL. BUNGALOW DUPLEX MINIMUM 1915 C 1217 ACACIA AVENUE EARLY RANCH UNALTERED 1935 D CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 205-207 CREST AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ' UNALTERED 1925 C- 211 CREST AVENUE SPANISH COLONIAL UNALTERED 1925 C 216 CREST AVENUE TUDOR REVIVAL UNALTERED 1928 A 221 CREST AVENUE SPANISH COLONIAL UNALTERED 1925 C+ 224 CREST AVENUE SPANISH COLONIAL MINIMUM 1925 C 306 & 310 CREST AVENUE CRAFTS. BUNG. UNALTERED 1915 B 307 CREST AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1910 A 311 CREST AVENUE COLONIAL REVIVAL UNALTERED 1920 B 323-323-1/2 CREST AVENUE SPANISH COL.000RT UNALTERED 1925 C+ 325 CREST AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1925 C- a 326 CREST AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 C- 330 CREST AVENUE SPANISH COLONIAL MINIMUM 1928 B 332 CREST AVENUE , SPANISH RANCH UNALTERED 1928 C CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 421-423 LAKE STREET CRAFTSMAN MODERATE 1925 C 431-435 LAKE STREET CRAFTSMAN COURT NONE 1920 D 505 LAKE STREET CRAFTSMAN NONE 1915 B 704 LAKE STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MAJOR 1920'S C 729 LAKE STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1915 A 737 LAKE STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINIMUM 1925 C- 1970 LAKE STREET 30'S METAL INDUST. MINOR 1930'S B 1980 LAKE STREET 30'S METAL INDUST. MINOR 1930'S B 1988 LAKE STREET 30'S METAL INDUST. MINOR 1930 B CITY OF RQN71NG70N BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 101-109-1/2 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1915 B 0 1-113 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1925 B 112-114 MAIN STREET BRICK COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1915 8 115 MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK COM MINOR 1916 B 116-116 1/2 MAIN STREET BRICK COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1915 C 117 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 C 119-121 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1920 B+ 120 MAIN. STREET BRICK COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1915 C _ 122 MAIN STREET EARLY COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1905 A 123 MAIN STREET EARLY COMMERCIAL SUBSTANTIAL 1923 B- 124 MAIN STREET MODERNE MODERATE 1910 B 1'26 MAIN STREET ZIGZAG MODERNE MODERATE 1935 A 127 MAIN STREET MODERNE MODERATE 1930 C 201-203 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL SUBSTANTIAL 1905 C 205 MAIN STREET ZIGZAG MODERNE MINOR 1930 B 206 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1915 C 207 MAIN STREET EARLY THEATRE MODERATE 1910 B 209 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1930 C 210-210 1/2 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1915 C 211 MAIN STREET 30'.S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1930 C 212 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1915 C 213 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1030 C 214 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 C 215 MAIN STREET. 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 B 217 MAIN STREET WESTERN FALSEFRONT MODERATE 1904 B 218 MAIN STREET 20'S, COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 C- 220 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 C 221 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 C 222-222 1/2 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 B 223 MAIN STREET 20'S. COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 C .224 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1925 B 226 MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK COMMER MINOR 1920 B 228 MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK COMMER MINOR 1920 A 301 MAIN STREET 20'S GAS STATION MODERATE 1920 C 305 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1930 C 307 MAIN STREET EARLY COMMERCIAL SUBSTANTIAL 1906 C- 309 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1930 C- 316-322 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1930 C 410 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MODERATE 1920 B 424 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR. 1920 B 428 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1930 C 605 MAIN STREET SPANISH RANCH MINOR 1930 C+ 607 MAIN STREET CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1925 C- 609 MAIN STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1903 B 610 MAIN STREET BRICK COMMERCIAL MINOR 1920'S C 617 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINOR 1915 C- 6.19. MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 1910 C 621-623 MAIN STREET SPANISH COLONIAL SUBSTANTIAL 1925 C 625 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN MINOR 1920 C 627 MAIN STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1930 8 'CITY OF HI!NTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET "STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 711 MAIN STREET, :SPANI-SH'tRANCH NONE 1925 C 713 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN..BUNGALOW NONE :1915 C 717 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 1910 B+ 718 MAIN STREET 40'S4.COLONIAL NONE 1940 C- 721 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN .,BUN GAL OW MINOR 1905 C 722 MAIN STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL, MINOR 11-910 >C 724 MAIN STREET CALIF BUNGALOW. : NONE 1915 G 726 MAIN STREET . CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 19.1-0 B; 727 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1910 C 730 MAIN STREET. CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 19110 C 731 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW NONE 191.0 B 734 MAIN STREET` 40"S RANCH`-: MINOR 1940 ,C- 735 MAIN STREET' CRAFTSMAN; BUNGALOW NONE 1910 B 737 MAIN STREET SPANISH RANCH NONE 1930 C 738-740 . MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1908 B+ : 741 MAIN STREET CALIF BUNGALOW NONE 1915 C 742 MAIN STREET SPANISH COLONIAL NONE 1925 C 752 MAIN STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1915 C 755 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1910 C 801 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 1915 D 804 MAIN STREET SPANISH COLONIAL MINOR 1928 C+ 806 MAIN STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL NONE 1905 B 810 MAIN STREET SPANISH COLONIAL NONE 1925 B 814-816 MAIN STREET BUNGALOW COURT NONE 1910 B 815 MAIN STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1905 B 817 MAIN STREET 40'S COLONIAL NONE 1940 C+ 821 MAIN STREET 40'S RANCH NONE 1940 C 833 MAIN STREET SPANISH RANCH SUBSTANTIAL 1930 D 902 MAIN STREET COLONIAL NONE 1940 C 908 MAIN STREET COLONIAL NONE 1940 C+ 9-12-914 MAIN STREET SPANISH COLONIAL NONE 1925 C+ 918 MAIN STREET 40'S RANCH NONE 1940 C-. 920 MAIN STREET 40'S COLONIAL MODERATE 1940 C- 92_4_ MAIN STREET 40'S RANCH NONE 1940 C- µ1010 - MAIN STREET 40'S INTERNATIONAL MINOR 1942 D 1024 MAIN STREET PERIOD REVIVAL MINOR 1930 C+ 1030 MAIN STREET 40'S RANCH MINOR 1940 C- 1104 MAIN STREET _ 40'S RANCH MINOR 1940 C- 1129 MAIN STREET COLONIAL NONE 1940 C 1200 BLOCK MAIN STREET NONE 1300 BLOCK MAIN STREET NONE 1400 BLOCK MAIN STREET NONE 1500 BLOCK MAIN STREET NONE 1600 BLOCK MAIN STREET NONE 1802 MAIN STREET SPANISH COLONIAL NONE 1925 C 1812 MAIN STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINOR 1905 D 1814 MAIN STREET 40'S RANCH MINOR 1942 C- 1816 MAIN STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINOR 1915 C 1905 MAIN STREET MEDITERRANEAN NONE 1926 A CITY OF .HLNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 316 OLIVE AVENUE MODERNS MODERATE 1935 A 411 OLIVE AVENUE MODERNS MODERATE 1935 B 607 OLIVE AVENUE BUNGALOW MAJOR 1930 D 608 OLIVE AVENUE CRAFTSMAN GARAGE UNALTERED 1925 D 715 OLIVE AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1920 C 717 OLIVE AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1920 C 914-916 OLIVE AVENUE SPANISH COL. DUPLEX MINIMUM __ 1.925 ___ C_ 1111 OLIVE AVENUE CAL. BUNGALOW DUPLEX UNALTERED 1920 D 1112 OLIVE AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1920 D 1113 OLIVE AVENUE COLONIAL REVIVAL UNALTERED 1920 D 1213 OLIVE AVENUE NEO-CLASSICAL MINOR 1900'S B 1406-1408 OLIVE AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 C -r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 200 ^ ORANGE AVENUE SPANISH COLONIAL NONE 1920'S C 204 ORANGE AVENUE SPANISH COLONIAL MAJOR 1920'S D 310 ORANGE AVENUE COTTAGE MINOR 1910 D 414 ORANGE AVENUE PRAIRIE STYLE APTS NONE 1915 B- 418 ORANGE AVENUE CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1915 C 614 ORANGE AVENUE CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1915 C 707 ORANGE AVENUE PERIOD REVIVAL MINIMUM 1925 D 712 ORANGE AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1920 D 902 ORANGE AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1915 C 914 ORANGE AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1915 C 1105 ORANGE AVENUE CARFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1910 D 1107 ORANGE AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1915 D 1410 ORANGE AVENUE COLONIAL REVIVAL MODERATE 1910 C CITY OF _HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 110 PACIFIC COAST CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 1910 B 114 PACIFIC COAST CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MODERATE 1905 A 304 PACIFIC COAST SPANISH COLONIAL REV MODERATE 1930 A 306 PACIFIC COAST SPANISH COLONIAL REV MINOR 1929 A 319 PACIFIC COAST MODERNS MINOR 1930 B 406 PACIFIC COAST 20'S COMMERCIAL. SUBSTANTIAL 1930 C 408 PACIFIC COAST 20'S COMMERCIAL SUBSTANTIAL 1930 C 410 PACIFIC COAST 20'S COMMERCIAL SUBSTANTIAL 1930 C 414-416 PACIFIC COAST 20'S COMMERCIAL SUBSTANTIAL 1905 C 520 PACIFIC COAST TRANSITIONAL MINOR 1910 B BAIT SHOP PACIFIC COAST ZIGZAG MODERNE NONE B CORNERSTONE PACIFIC COAST NONE 1914 B PIER ENTRAN PACIFIC COAST ZIGZAG MODERNE NONE .1930 B PIER SHOPS PACIFIC COAST ZIGZAG MODERNE NONE 1930 B CITY OF HUNTI-NGTON •BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATItONS ,DATE RATING 814 PALM AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 B 900 PALM AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1920 B 907 PALM AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 C 1114 PALM AVENUE CALFORNIA -BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1925 C 1411 PALM AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 D 1502 PALM AVENUE ZIGZAG MODERNE UNALTERED 1933 A I600 (b) PALM AVENUE NEO-CLASSICAL UNALTERED 1931 A CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 1817 PARK STREET SPANISH COLONIAL UNALTERED 1925 A 1837 PARK STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL MINIMUM 1915 C I i I I4 I iI 1 I i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 205-207 PECAN AVENUE VERNACULAR COTTAGES REPAIRS NEED 1920 D 343 PECAN AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 601 PECAN AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1925 D 608 PECAN AVENUE CONVERTED GARAGE MODERATE 1925 D 612 PECAN AVENUE CALIF BUNGALOW MINOR 1920'S C 713 PECAN AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1925 C 908 PECAN AVENUE SPANISH COLONIAL UNALTERED 1930 C 912 PECAN AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1930 D . 914 PECAN AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1930 D 1009 PECAN AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1925 D 1011 PECAN AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW MODERATE 1925 D 1012 PECAN AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW SIGNIFICANT 1925 D CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 181.5 PINE STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1915 C 1840 PINE STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1925 C I i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS,. DATE: RATING. 119 WALNUT AVENUE. COTTAGE ' MODERATE: . 1920'_S_ D _. 214 WALNUT_AVENUE COTTAGE= MAJOR , 1920'S D 311 WALNUT AVENUE 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1920. B 412-414 WALNUT AVENUE 20'S COMMERCIAL MINOR 1925 B 513-519 WALNUT AVENUE WESTERN FALSEFRONT NONE 1904 A 705 WALNUT AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1920 D 708 WALNUT AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1920 C 712 WALNUT AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1920 C- 716-718 WALNUT AVENUE PERIOD REV. TRIPLEX UNALTERED 1925 B 811 WALNUT AVENUE CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW UNALTERED 1920 C 1210 WALNUT AVENUE CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW MINIMUM 1910 C+ 1520 WALNUT AVENUE 40'S RANCH UNALTERED 1945 C CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 5141-5171 WARNER AVENUE VERNACULAR 'MINOR 1940'S C i I I I i CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HISTORICAL SURVEY STREET STYLE ALTERATIONS DATE RATING 300 YORKTOWN GREEK REVIVAL HOUSE MINIMUM 1875 & 8 A 333 YORKTOWN EARLY FARM HOUSE MINIMUM 1905 B 333 YORKTOWN CRAFTSMAN OFFICE MAJOR 1910 D APPHIIM D HLWIC nWMW O lRKAL OM AREA COM'IRilC1AL CORE AREA RMORIC lNVMTORT- PMAM 9129/86 MESTGaICAL UTING '*-HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT 0-NOT HISTORICALMERY A019M 1-POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR IF REMODEL REVERSED 2-POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR TO DISTRICT 3-POSSIBLE NATIONAL REGISTER LISTING R-RESIDENTIA I-ROQUIRES SEISMIC UPGRADE STREET 50. STREET STILE M.,cousraorr. HIST.]RATMG STROCT.RATING 115 3RD STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 2 1 221 321)STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL 1995 2R 303 32D STREET VANISH REVIVAL 1923 3 1 121 5TH STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1922 1 122 5TH STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL 1935 2 284 57H STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGALOW 1909 3-R 206 5TH STREET QUEEN ANNE COTTAGE 1900 2-9 210 5TH STRiI$'1' 20'S COMMERCIAL 1924 1 1 214 5TH STREET 20-S COMMERCIAL 1925 2*5 1 223 5TH STREET STREAMLINE MODIRNE 1930 1 1 301 5THSTREHT 20'S BRICK COMMERCIAL 1920 1 311 ITHSTRFUT ZIG-ZAGMODERNE 1930 2 1 313 5TH STREET CRAFTSMAN HOUSE 191 0-R 317 5TH STREET CRAFTSMAN HOUSE 1910 2-R 321 5TH STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL 1903 2-R 328 5TH STREET SPANISH COLONIAL 1928 2-R 218-220 370 STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 3 1 { t 15 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMEtCIAL 1916 2 1 117 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 1 120 MAIN STREET BRICK COMMERCIAL 1915 on 1 122 MAIN STREET EARLY COMMERCIAL 1905 tw 1 123 MAIN STREET EARLY COMMERCIAL 1923 1" 124 MAIN STREET MODERNE 1910 2*x 126 MAIN STREET ZIGZAG MODERNE 1935 3 1 i t 27 MAIN STREET MODERNE 1930 1 1 202 MAIN STREET NEW 1970 0 205 MAIN STREET ZIGZAG MODERNE 1930 2 1 207 MAIN STREET EARLY THEATRE 1910 2 1 208 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1913 0 I 209 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1930 2 1 211 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL 1930 2 1 212 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL I9t5 1 1 213 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1930 2 214 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 1 213 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 1 2t7 MAIN STREET WESTERN FALSEFRONT 19t0 to 218 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 0 1 220 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 1 221 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 I 223 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 I 224 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1925 1 I 226 MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK COMMERCIAL 1920 2 1 228 MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK COMMERCIAL 1920 3 1 301 MAIN STREET 20'S GAS STATION 1920 1 1 i PAGE 1 I - COMMB ICIAL CORE AREA HISTORIC IMV=TORT- PRRPAM 9/29/86 HISTORICAL.WING HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT 0-NOT HISTORICALIVERY ALTERED 1-POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR IF REMODEL REVERSED 2 -POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR TO 0ISTRICT 3-POSSIBLE NATIONAL REGISTER LISTING R-RESIDENTIAL I-RBQUIM SEISMIC UPGRADE 305 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL 1930 2 1 367 MAIN STREET EARLY COMMERCIAL 1906 0 1 309 MAIN STREET SO'S COMMERCIAL 1930 0 I 410 MAIN STREET 20'S COMM®CIAL 1920 0 1 424 MAIN$TREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 428 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL 1930 1 101-109 1/2 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1915 1 I 111-113 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL .1923 1 I 116-116 1/2 MAIN STREET BRICK COMMERCIAL 1915 1 1 119-121 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 2 1 201-203 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 0 1 210-210 1/2 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1915 1 1 222-222 1/2 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 2 1 316- 22 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL 1933 0 1 316 OLIVE STREET MODERNS 1935 3 1 411 OLIVE STREET MODERNS 1930 2 I 306 PACIFIC COAST SPANISH COLONIAL M. 1929 3 1 319 PACIFIC COAST MODERNE 1930 2 406 PACIFIC COAST 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 1 409 PACIFIC COAST 20'S COMMERCIAL 1930 1 1 410 PACIFIC COAST 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 1 414-416 PACIFIC COAST 20'S COMMERCIAL 1910 I= l CORNERSTONE PACIFIC COAST NONE 1914 2 PIER SHOPS PACIFIC COAST ZIGZAG MODERNE 1930 2 BAIT SHOP IPIER ZIGZAG MODERNE 1930 2 311 IWALNUT 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 2 412-414 IWALMUT 20'S COMMERCIAL 1925 2 I PAGE 2 • COMMERCIAL CORE AREA RISTORIC INvzmTORI- PREPARED 91z9186 HISTORICAL RATING A :••-HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT 0=NOT HISTORICALIVERY ALTERED :la POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR IF REMODEL REVERSED :................................................................................................................................................................................... 2=POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR TCr iiISTRICT i 3=POSSIBLE.NATIONAL REGISTER LISTING R= RESIDENTIAL 'I= RE QUIRES SEISMIC UPGRADE STREET NO. STREET STILE EST.COMSTRUCT.iHIST.RATINGiSTRUCT.RATING ........................ ...... ............ .................................................p.....................................p................... ................. 11. .............................. 3RD STREET ......... 20'S COMMERCIAL ................ 1920 .............. ......................................2 I.................... .. ..... ...... :... .. ... 221 ...........................•'.3RD STREET ;COLONIAL REVIVAL ............. 19C5-.............. 2R....................... ........... ................. 3�5..............................€3RD STREET SPANISH REVIVAL 1925 3 .................I..................p........................................q............................................................p.............................................................................I.........�... ... 121 15TH STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1922 1 ...... ............ .............. ...............;............... ...............;........................................... 122 1,5TH STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL _. 1935 2 204.............................45TH STREET..........pCRAFTSMAN BUNGALOWa.................1908 08................;..............3-R.............;.......................................... .............................................................................................................................................................................;.....................................;............................................. 206 .......:..................:.5TH STREET .........;.QUEEN ANNECOTTAGE.. ' ...............1900............... 2-R........................ ....... ° ................... . ... ... ....... .. .. 210 ......................... 1. TH STREET ...... 20-S COMMERCIAL ............ ' .............. 1924 ..:.......... ' .......... ..1.. ...:...... ' ..................I...................... ......................I............................ ...... ..... ......... ............ ... 214 5TH,STRE,ET............ 20:S.C.OMMERCIAL................a..................1925 ...............2., I.. ZZ.S........................... '3TH STREET ...... :STREAMLINE MODERNS ' .............. 1930 ............. ° ............. 1 .......... ' ...................I.................. 301 5TH STREET 120'S BRICK COMMERCIAL' 1920 1 11.............................oSTH STREET..........4ZIG-ZAG MODERNS. ...........,.................1930............... 2............. I................. .. ................. ...... ....... .............. ................. ............... ........ ........................................... 313 ................. ...........................;5TH STREET ....... :CRAFTSMAN HOUSE ........ 915................ 15.............. .......... o-R.......... ........................................ .. ..t.................................................. q 317 5TH STREET ;CRAFTSMAN HOUSE 1910 2-R ......................... ...... ....... ................. 2-R ................... .............p.......................................... 321.............................:5TH STREET :COLONIAL REVIVAL 19U 2-R q........................................q.................................I..........................p............................T..........................................................:......... ....... ..................... iSPANISH..COLONIAL......... 1 28. ............. 2-R ........................................ 328 5TH STREET ...........N ... .......N .... 9. ;..................................... 21$-220.................. STH STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL .............. ................................................. 3.............. I................... 115 :MAIN STREET i 20'S COMMERCIAL 1916 2 I ..........................................................:..............................................................................................................a......................:..............q............................................. 117 ;MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 1 ....................I..................p........................................4............................................................p...................................................................................................................................... 120 .............. .......MAIN STREET „ :BRICK COMMERCIAL ...... .............. 1915. .............. ` ......:......0,• .......... I....:.............. 122 iMAIN STREET *EARLY COMMERCIAL i 1905 1•• I .1.�3............................°MAIN STREET......;EARLY............................................................ COMMERCIAL.........,.................1.9�3............... .. .............1..�........... .. ........................................ ....................................................................................................................................... .. ...... .............. ;...................:......................... .. ... . .. ..;.. ...... 124 :MAIN STREET .............................p........................................oM O DERNE....................................;....................�1 D...................................2... .... .............. ..................... 126 1MAIN STREET :ZIGZAG MODERNE 1935 3 I ...................... 4.............. ............. ................. ... ................. 12? '•MAIN STREET MODERNS 1930 1 I 2a ..............................MAIN STREET ;NEW 1970 ...............................................................0.............. `............ ........... ....... 305 ....... 111AIN STREET 1ZIGZAG MODERE 1930 2 ............................. ....... ...... . ...................:......................................i.............................................. .............. gib................ 2 .......:.... ...................I..................... ............ ..4.. ..p.. 208 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1915 0 I 209 ;MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL i 1930 .2............... ?. .........:......: ... .. ............ .................................................0.. ..y.. 211 (MAIN STREET i 30'S COMMERCIAL i 1930 2 I .......................................q........................................q............................................................q.......................................................................................:.............................................. 212 1MAIN STREET 120'S COMMERCIAL 1915 1 I ............... ............................................... ............................................... .............,.....:............ .....................................;............:................................ 213 aMAINSTREET a20;S,C0MMERCIAL o 1930 ,2 .... 9 .................... ........ ... .................... ....................,... . . ... 214 11AIN STREET :20 S COMMERCIAL 1 20 1 I .. ............ .............. .................o............... . ............... ................... ............................. ........................................ ...:.............................................. ...:... ............... . . ... 215 iMAIN STRfiET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 I 217 :MAIN STREET 1WESTERN FALSEFRONT ': 1910 1 ...........................:.. ............ .............. .................e............... ...............p..................... .................. 218 MAIN STREET i 20'S COMMERCIAL i 1920 1 0 I .......................................p........................................p............................................................p.................................................;.................................................................................... 22Q..............................:MAIN STREET 2Q;S COMMERCIAL................1................. 192Q............... ............................... ...................I....................... ..0.. ..p.. ........................... .......... ..... .. .... . 221 1MAIN STREET 12Q'S COMMERCIAL 1 1920 1 I 223 :MAIN STREET 120'S COMMERCIAL............ 1920 .............. ..........................1I .................;.. 224 AMAIN STREET e20;S COMMERCIAL a 1,925 1 I.. .................... 9 .........................................................;.................... ................ 226 1MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK COMMERCIAL: 1 20 2 I .............................. ;.............................................................. .............. .. ...... .............. ............. ............................................ 228 :MAIN STREET 2Q'S BRICK COMMERCIAL: 1920 3. I ............................q........................................p............................................................q................................................................. ............. ................ ................ 341 `:MAIN STREET ...�... ........ ...120'S GAS STATION 1920 € 1 I i PAGE 1 I COXNEXCIAL CORE AREA 111STOXI.0 INW19TORY- PUPARED 9/29/96 HISTORICAL RATING HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT .............................................................................................................................................. ................................................ ..................I.......................................................... 0 a NOT HISTORICAL/VERY ALTERED 11-POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR IF REMODEL REVERSED ............................................................................. ...... ...............I............... ...................... POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR TO-DISTRICT J:3=POSSIBLE NATIONAL REGISTER LISTING R= RESIDENTIAL i I c RE QUIRES SEISMIC UPGRADE 305 - !:MAIN'STREET I 30'S COMMERCIAL ..................................... ... ....................................... JEARLYcbmllERCIAL tMAIN Sfifif........... ............. ig,...0 6, 7, 0 1 ..............07 ............. ........i................ .......... ............................................................ ......................................................... ...............;........................... 111AIN-STREET i 30-S COMMERCIAL 1930 .0 1 ...............................I.................................................................................41...........I.............I..................... ..................................... ................................... 410 111AINSTREET 2 O'S COMMERCIAL a,).n I .................. ........... ........ .......... 424 :MAIN STREET :20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 ........... ............I.................................................................................................................................... ..................................... ............................................ 42@IMAINSTRW '30'S COMMERCIAL 1930 Yfi ........................................ 1915 1 ........................................................................................I..................................................................................................... ...................................... MAINSTREET i20 COMMERCIAL .. . ............................................0............................................................ ..................... ...................I............. 116-116 1/2 :!MAIN STREET ;BRICK COMMERCIAL 1915 . .............I...........................................2......................... ..........................I........................... ............... ........ ............... .................. ............................................ 119-121 'MAIN STREET '201 COMMERCIAL .2 .................. ................................. 0........... ............ ................:MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL .................... ......... ........................................................................ .............. ........ ................................................... ....................................... v ................ 1 ......I.......................................................... 222-222 1/2 111AINSTREET f20'SCOMM-ERCIAL 2 1920 ..............I.............................- .............. ............................................. 316-322 MAIN Sfifif--l- ..........j........................................ jp.-�IT 9 c:.......................... ................................................. ................................................................................... .�qg gR IAL- 1935� I 316 OLIVE STREET MODERNE 1935 -'3" ......... ............................. ......... ............................................. 2 1 STREET ::110 ...................................... ........................................ .............................................................I.................. .............................................................I........................ *!PACIFIC COAST 'SPANISH COLONIAL REV.": 1929 .................................................................................................... ............................................. ....... .............a.......................................... 319 !PACIFIC COAST :MODERNE 1930 2 ............ ........................................ ..................................................................................................................................... 4 406 201 C01111ERCIAL 1920. .......... ............................ ......I...........I COMMERCIAL ...............................................................::......... ..................................... ....................................... PAICIFIC COAST :2 O'S C 01-111ERCIAL 1-930 .......... ...................... ............................................................ ......................................... ..................................................................................... !.PACIFIC..'�.. ST 1920 1 1 ........................................... .....I............................................ ..................................... I ................. 414-416 COAST 12OT-COMMERCIAL - -11910 ......................................f...................... ...............2............ ....................... ......................................................................................... CORNERSTONE ::PACIFIC MONE 1914 2 ' '- , ,** - . ................ ............... . ........... ..........................................iiiiii6ii 'PACIFICCbAST :il6iAdi0DERNE 2. ........................... .. . .............. ... ........... ................. .............. ............. ........................................ BAIT SHOP PIfiA ZIGZAG 1ODERNE 1930' 2 ....- --*- ........ l ................. , .......................................... .20-S COMMERCIAL 1 20 .................. WALNUT.:............... ................................... ..... . i .............................................. PAGE 2 REQUE' C Y COUNQ_ .ACTION 2���/�C f.�Zj� u;�0 A; 00 J� RH 86-14 Date & Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members IrrsM rrs��cj/ Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator U Prepared by: Douglas N. LaBelle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment Subject: HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY STATUS REPORT Consistent with Council Policy? 5( Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for the City Council's consideration is a request for a 30 day period in which to review the issuance of demolition permits for select buildings in the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. RECOMMENDATION: Council approve a 30 day period in which to review the issuance of demolition permits for the buildings listed on the attachment to this report. ANALYSIS: At the City Council meeting of February 3, 1986 members of the Historical Society requested that something be done in order to assure the community that the results of the Historical Resources Survey be reported prior to the demolition of any more potentially historic structures. At the meeting staff reported that the study is currently under way and that the . downtown commercial area was to be the first priority. A preliminary windshield survey has been completed for the downtown area and a list of the buildings of particular concern has been attached to this report. Concurrent with this study is the enforcement of the City's Seismic Safety Ordinance. The Ordinance requires that all buildings sited as being seismically unsafe must be brought into compliance with the Code or removed by May 10, 1986. Attached to this report is a list of those buildings. Structures which are effected by both the Historic Resources Survey and the Seismic Safety Code have been noted. Staff will also be prepared to discuss with Council procedures for the issuance of demolition permits and the compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1. Continue pending further information. PIO 4/84 RH 86-14 February 10, 1986 Page Two ATTACHMENTS: 1. List of downtown buildings of potential historic significance. 2. List of buildings sited for seismic safety problems. CWT/DLB/MA:ajh 1964h PRELINLi M HISTMC INVENTM-HUNTINGI'ON BEACH 0-NO HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 1 -POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR IF REMODEL REVERSED 2 a POSSIBLE CONTRIBUTOR 3=POSSIBLE NATIONAL RE61STER LISTING Jel Sw1�C CohCe�v�S STREET NO. STREET STYLE EST.CONSTRUCT. HIST.RATING. ,c201-203 MAIN STREET. 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 0 208 MAIN. STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1915 0 *.218 MAIN STREET 201S COMMERCIAL 1920 0 307 MAIN STREET EARLY COMMERCIAL 1906 0 309 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL 1930 0 210 5TH STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1924 1 101-109-1/2 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1915 1 111-113 - MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1925 1 116-116 3/2 MAIN STREET BRICK COMMERCIAL 1915 1- 117 MAIN STREET 20IS COMMERCIAL 1920 1 4 118 MAIN STREET BRICK COMMERCIAL 1915 1 �F 122 MAIN STREET EARLY COIM'IERCIAL 1905 1 123 MAIN STREET EARLY COMMERCIAL 1923 1 127 MAIN STREET MODERNE 1930 1 210-210 1/2 MAIN STREET '20'S COMMERCIAL 1915 1 212 MAIN. STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1915 1 214 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 215 MAIN STREET 20'S CO[M'1ERCIAL 1920 1 217. MAIN STREET WESTERN FALSEFRON_ T .1910 1 220 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 221 MAIN STREET 201S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 X 223 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 224 MAIN STREET 201S COMMERCIAL 1925 1 411 OLIVE STREET . MODERNE 1935 1 406 PACIFIC COAST 201S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 .408 PACIFIC COAST 201S COMMERCIAL 1930 1 408 1/2. PACIFIC COAST 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 1 414-416 PACIFIC (OAST 20'S COMMERCIAL 1910 1 115 3RD STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 2 122 5TH STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL 1935 2 206 5TH STREET QUEEN ANNE COTTAGE 1900 . 2 A 214 5TH STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1925 2 328 5TH. STREET SPANISH COLONIAL 1928 2 115 MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK COM 1916 2 119-121 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 2 124 MAIN STREET MODERNE 1910 2 205 MAIN STREET ZIGZAG MODERNE 1930 2 207 MAIN STREET EARLY THEATRE 1910 2 -4209 MAIN STREET 30'.S COMMERCIAL 1930 2 211 MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL 1930 2 213 - MAIN STREET 30'S COMMERCIAL 1930 2 222-222 1/2 MAIN STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 2 226 MAIN STREET 201S BRICK COMMER 1920 2 301 MAIN STREET 20'S GAS STATION 1920 2 . f 305 MAIN STREET . 30'S COMMERCIAL 1930 2 CORNERSTORE PACIFIC COAST NONE 1914 2 PIER SHOPS PACIFIC COAST ZIGZAG MODERNS 1930 2 BAIT SHOP PIER ZIGZAG MODERNE 2 412-414 WLANUr 20'S COMMERCIAL 1925 2 221 31M STREET COLONIAL REVIVAL 1905 3 303 3RD STREET SPANISH COL,CFLiAL 1925 3 204 5TH STREET CRAFTSMAN BUNGAQAW 1908 3 218-220 5TH STREET 20'S COMMERCIAL 1920 3 128 MAIN STREET ZIGZAG MODERNS 1935 3 228 MAIN STREET 20'S BRICK OOMMER 1920 3 316 OLIVE STREET MODERNE 1935 3 302 PACIFIC COAST SPANISH COLONIAL REV 1930 3 * 306 PACIFIC COAST SPANISH COEaUAL REV 1929 3 3 fcr,7 I-e--- TV yj F7.- f-, LT 21 P ah f rl r . N IkA P N N ?Q/2 ® p4v �!,Gi� Nlf'1� thirtieth street architects 4z V5�r © N�T�oNhl� No yNy W, o S MARY OF BUILDING REPOPTS 0� BLDG. NO. ADDRESS. STORIES' RAT ING 101-109 Main Street 2 I . 2 -113 3 I15 it It 2 I 4- 117 " " 2 I 5 119-.121 n u 1 I 6 215 a it . 2 I. 7 428 . 8 228 " It 2 I 9 222 _ 10 218 to it 2 I 11 212 tt n 2 I 12 208 13 126 tt it 2 I 14 122 " " (rear of) I I 15 1I6-118 it it 2 I .16 112-114 " " 2 ! I 17 610 " " ! I 18 302 Pac;f;c Coast H;ghway I I 19 306 n n u 20 410 . 21 414 Walnut 2 _ 22 214 Sth Street I _ 23 218-220 5th Street i I 24 301 25 311 Walnut 26 307 3rd Street I I 27 704 Lake Street I I 28 18971 Ma;n Street 29 203 Ma;n Street (rear) t I 30 205 " " (rear of I 31 209 " " 1 I C t '"`t,^T Z•�`-""T,� AR. -BUILDINGPO continue - - — ---Y OF RE �_( d) $ 1� - A. BLDG. NO. ADDRESS . - - STORIES RAT ING 32 21.1 Main Street I _ 33 221 Of - If 34 223 ° If 2 I 35 305 36 307 Main Street 2 I 37 420 5th Street I I 38 .410 Main Street 2 I 39 316-322 Main Street I _ 40 224 rr n I T 41 226 a tr I I — 42 • 303 rr It I I 43 220 n n 1 _ 44 214 45 210 It 11 2 I 46 120 Main Street 1 I 47 109± 5th Street 48 104±- rr rr ( T. .49 2.10_ 50 225 rr u I 51 311 52 115 3rd Street is I -o-o-- ... o- 1�5. - e�aw a/ -.. -t't.n1L, 1 � AU -. ?l�bn4 O$� eeA4.t owes ' . oMe6 QAg +Xc0.1 x Duties/MT. gNl� . -Solt gcvArt ILOt:i�Ti AVE. C�'►�Ci/APr. -r.rR`v+/ yr t •Yurt�cT -- � Et4. .� ' "�': x X cserq/Ar .r. `�eE wr►. VT t4Av RES. OVA go 23 V•n 31 TAC tiFlG TARju44 z gdo► Q : x s X EL% yp A"tt'� 6 .. UAVo1-.Arco 3 ( ClnT11[S Ief�et A?A7ttMOtT w F x y.R. 4 3AKELY 5 ull-MALL/APf. - X ?VMS. - 7'ur-r!o[�tAS11V AUtfiNGtwl 2 ARIUN 4 t 2� ih X tfEllµ Ni N x 9vxs Ono Q9 bMtt "? III O- VLUCi X f elotlRY/ .:.5 . . r �rrc stye cnrL 13 gee � � . . X Y: VkArT ' 4kS * x t�flwEL I, X >: "A Ct SYrtil LAvm%.W x 'S eLdruc$ x tLrnuES /A xErx� -n►a�rr Sue► / AST x �N �n a: g,ler N otXEd /AP+. sun eLa x TAZ.k�dr rmvW l�TY1�R X '.�`[ xx Ok�awaao�, I��w�•�� �y x . 'P�2i V�lfy` - uKrA►.ogeo �►� eae,,►,hata� I RlPCRT � ILIMYWELLS _`s $TQ1 . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ,I,NI,NG,ON„EAC„ MAYOR'S MEMO, . , . , , TO ALL CITY COUNCILMEMBERS and CHARLES W. FROM BOB MANDIC, JR. THOMPSON, City Administrator SUBJECT City Fees DATE December 27, 1985 Since city fees are so high on new construction, I would like the City Council to consider some kind of exception for restoring buildings of historical significance. Attached is a copy of some of the problems we are encountering with the Pope house. There are over. $11,000 in fees. . It might help if some = fees could be waived on buildings of historical significance, or at least considered as a rehab rather than new construction. Since I will be absent from the next City Council meeting, I would like to have Mayor Pro Tem bring up this issue for discussion. RPM:bb Attachments j I j i December 21, 1985 Tony Cate 7 1T 227 12th Street Huntington Beach, Ca. 92648 Bob Mandic Mayor City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, Ca. . Dear Mr. Mandic; The purpose of this letter is to express some concerns regarding the 'Pope House' project. In taking ownership of this home, and preserving it in a manner consistent with the guidelines of the Huntington Beach Historical Society, I had budgeted the following monies in approximation with actual projected construction - costs; HOME Donation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19000 Title & Escrow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 300 MOVING OF THE. HOME Moving Company. . . . . . . 9,000 Overhead utility adjustments. . . . . . . .. . . $ 6,500 Garage demolition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...$ 400 HOME AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS Grading. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 300 Foundation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 39500 Electrical. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 3,000 Plumbing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 39300 Insulation & heating units. . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 19000 Walls, windows & doors. . . . . . . . o . o . . . . . .$ 1,400 Painting. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . 000000 # 6$ 1,000 Floor & carpets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . $ 29500 Fixtures & lriisc.. . . . . . . . . . . . � . . , . , , , . , .$ 10800 Landscaping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 29000 Utility hookups. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 650 APPROXIMATETOTAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ O In securing financing for this project, I had used • the above figures including a nominal amount for what • I,,thought would be city fees. At this point, though, these fees appear to total the following, and consequently exceed my financial lending limit by nearly the same; Parks & Recreation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,941 Public Works. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8 , 750 (page one of two) Building Department... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..$ 765 Planning Department. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 115 APPROXIMATE TOTAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$IL,531 Since these fees constitute costs for 'new construction'', it was .suggested to me that this project should be approached in terms of improving an existing home, thus changing the fee structure. Since my ability to undertake this project rests on this issue, I would appreciate the opportunity to meet and discuss it with you. Thank you for assisting the Historical Society and ourselves in working. toward preserving this home. SinQerel� �- Anthony E. Cate cc Mike Adams, Department of Re-Development (page two of two) _.i � ^ M (` 7r Lam' C I T Y O F H U N T INGTON BEACH PARK AND RECREATION FEES Pursuant to Article 996 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code and Resolutions 5071, establishing cost of land, and 5072, establishing density factors (adopted August 16, 1982) , fees to be paid. for the residential developments are as follows: DENSITY TYPE OF UNIT FACTOR $FEE/UNIT 1110. UNIT FEE SINGLE FAMILY 3. 43 $2 , 395 . 00 MULTIPLE FAMILY 1 . Single/Bachelor 1 . 17 817 . 00 2 . ' One Bedroom 1. 57 1 , 096 . 00 3 . Two Bedrooms 2 . 38 1, 662 . 00 � . Three Bedrooms + 2. 78 1, 941 . 00 �V. MOBILE HOME 1. 69 1, 180 . 00 TOTAL FEE FEES PAID PLAN CHECK NO. Date Receipt No. JOB LOCATION. •" PARK AND RECREATION FEE FORMULA PER ARTICLE 996 5. 0 (D..U. x D.F . ) x $139, 633 . 00 = _ 1000 FEES Sewer ❑ $' 195.00for the first dwelling unit, plus the sum o $ 130.00for each additional dwelling unit on parcels ' containing less than 10,000 square feet. 1 unit @ $195/unit $195 . 00 units @ $130/unit $ Total S • $130 . 00 per dwelling unit or $645 per acre whichever is greater for parcels containing more than 10 , 000 sq. ft . units @ $130/unit $ � acreas @ $645/acre S ❑ $ 645/per acre for all commercial and industrial developments. acres @ $645/acre $ Orange County Sanitation District Nos . 3 i 11 ❑ $50 for each 1000 sq. ft. of floor area with a $250/min. (commercial and industrial) s. f.. @ $50/1000 s. f. $ t250 per dwelling unit units @ $250/unit $ �� Water ❑ $ 6(Yper dwelling unit or $300/per acre whichever is greater. _units @ $ 60/unit $ acres @ $ 300/acre $ ❑ $12.00 per unit for water used during construction units @ $12/unit $ Drainage Your property is located in Drainage District No . for which the fee is $ 4j��C/ per acre. ® acres @ $ /acre $ �� - ❑ Developer to pay cost of paving 1/2 of 51 ----- ig�n-s N, and .1/2 c.f alley Cam.s e� �-► Cc�wcv fib-{- ` ,��. IJEI'd(iI•lh•NI. 0? RILI-IM0, 11UNLINtiLUN DrgAW19 & COMMUNITY DEVI-101'MENT CALIFORNIA 1 1, BUILDING RELOCATIONS PROCEDURAL OUTLINE STEP I A. Complete building relocation application. B. Lbmit building relocation fee. 1. $500.00 per living unit. C. Complete building permit application. D. Submit structural plans in duplicate: P P � 1.. Plot plan. 2. Floor plan. 3. Foundation plan and details. 4. Complete structural drawings on all modification or additions.. , 5. Grading plan (drainage flow, elevation, finish floor STEP II elevation. ) A. Schedule an on-site inspection of the building. 1. The building official will approve, conditionally approve or deny the buildings relocation. B. If relocation is approved or conditionally approved all "relocation fees" are forfeited. A. If relocation is denied $400.00 per living unit will be refunded. STEP III A. Denials are appealable to the Huntington Beach Board of Zoning Adjustments. B. Upon approval of relocation the building official will: 1. Commence plan check on working drawings. 2. Publish notification of relocation in a periodical of local circulation. 3. Send written notification of relocation to all land owners within a 300' radius of proposed site. 4. Post subject property site with notice of relocation card for a period of seven days. C. All land owners receiving notification have the right to file a written protest against the proposed relocation provided said protest is filed during the seven day posting period. D. If no protest is filed and all other requirements are ful- filled. a relocation permit will be issued. E. If a protest is filed it will be heard by the Huntingtor► Beach City Council at their next regular meeting following the end of the posting period. The Council's decision will be final. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Completion bond required prior to issuance of permits. 1.. Amount to be, decermined by the building official. ... B. FEES' 1. Building Department (prior to issuance of .permits.) I I a. Park and Recreation .fee. =� b. .. Building permit fee. ?c. Plumbing, mechanical and heating permit fees. ` M. Electrical permit fee. _ 2. Department df P%ublic Works. Contact the Department of Public Works fora listing of their fees and possible land dedications. C. Note that final building inspection and approval is NOT a ralease for occupancy of any building. Occupancy of buildings will is,-t be released until conformance with all applicable codes, ordinances and imposed conditions has been achieved. (#75-008) I BOARD OF _—) C' of Huntington Reach �® STMtNTS I)EVI�.LQ .NT SERVICES I)EFrf. FOE ZONINGJUPO. Box 190 Huntington Reach, Calif. 92641t CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Telt (714) 536-5271 Nt 1rNcwN KAc" Present Zone DM t/ 74e N TYPE.OF PETITION !FEE CASK.NUMBER App+cant or Aut or .e Agent se Permit UP = 2 r1 �f' �.j� L• ��e� �'��� Conditional Exception CE Matting Address Plot Plan Amendment PPA - Administrative Review ,'�� � AR - Te ep one Number Acr 40, roperty Odner ❑ Ownership verification Mailing-Address ❑ Letter of Authorization (initials) Board Action Date: Commission Action Date: ❑ Approved ❑ Sustained RZA ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Approved ❑ Withdrawn ❑ Withdrawn .❑ Referred to P. C. ❑ Referred back to RZA Appealed: Yes❑ No ❑ Appealed: Yes ❑ No ❑ (gate filed) t TO PERMIT.;Re O� t4N O tt o Ida! FCS/ N« re .� ? 0 I�4ie+llllnttf�l.;/;i A43 91l�a�e 1' .fefib �►'e,,^ y'C" t�$be►aFc �e-oe�. a►�Nw �r PURSUANT 'I'U:. IN I.IF..0 UF: PPA Previous Case: l LOCATION OF PROPERTY: r 1. Street Address:12 <<L S{ ��l9il-F_ _ 2. Side of street? e.- 3. Distance from nearest intersecting street 4. Name of nearest intersecting street: 61Lrr'o-0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Assessor's Parcel number 1. Lot Z_ S ir ZPT Block G I L► Tract Section Township Range . . or 2. Metes and Rounds: J TIFICATION: (Fill in cnmpletely:attach additional sheets if necessary) AR r PPA: State reasons for this req est and length of,time requested for use. A(ley ded l 9o—+/•N 41OLS �d v6(r,d � f�)rtV N' CUP, State reasons why the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use or building applied for will not be detri- mental to: 1) the general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or 2) injurious to property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building. CEt The objective of a conditional exception is to achieve parity and not to grant special privilege. When considering properties in the vicinity and under an identical zone classification, please respond to the following: 1. What exceptional circumstances apply to petitioned property(including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings) that deprive it of privileges normally enjoyed? 2. Will the Conditional Exception constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with normal limitations? 3. Why is this Conditional Exception necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights? 4. State reasons why the granting of this Conditional Exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare. pleas rp�int I, /"ti have..read and understand all statements including the Supplement-to- Petition on t e reverse side of this application. I am the property owner or authorized agent of subject property. I hereby declare (affirm) under penalty of perjury that the for going statement, facts, and attached report are true and correct. J57 1-2- Signature of! op ty Owner or Cl Authorised Agent Date B-fM-IOB SUPPLEMENT — TO — PETITIONS BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS REQUIRED OF ALL PETITIONS BEFORE THE BOARD: 1. The petition must be typed or printed and filled-in completely. 2. If applicant is not the property owner, a letter of AUTHORIZATION from the owner shall ac- company this petition. 3. Board of Zoning Adjustment decisions are final unless APPEALED to the Planning Commission. Appeals must be filed with the Secretary to the Planning Commission within ten (10) days of such decision and shall be in writing specifying the areas of aggrievement. In no case shall permits or licenses be issued until such time has lapsed. 4. Unless otherwise specified, ALL petitions, if not acted upon, shall become NULL AND VOID one (1) year from the effective date. 16444 + _ C S. Petitions must be accompanied with six (6) plot plans, two (2) floor plans.4nd ouu� that have a minimum size of 8'h" x 11"and conform to the following requirements: a. Draw to scale, and indicate the scale and North direction arrow. b. Plot the entire parcel and dimension ALL pertinent data such as driveways, landscaping, park- ing, and distances to all property lines. , . C. Plot all EXISTING and PROPOSED physical features and structures: d. Dimension to nearest intersecting street and signify all street names. e. Include a legend on the lower right-hand corner of your plot plan which lists among other things, the owner's or authorized agent's address and telephone number. 6. Petitions shall be accompanied by six (6) copies of preliminary illustrations of all proposed signs for the project. 7. Please note that petitions without sufficient data or if submitted on the de dline may be delayed in processing. REQUIRED OF EACH SPECIFIC PETITION BEFORE THE BOARD: 1. USE PERMIT and CONDITIONAL. EXCEPTION petitions: a. The City Council may revoke any Use Permit or Conditional Exception when the intent has not been accomplished within a period of six (6) months from the date it was granted. b. if a Use Permit or Conditional Exception has been denied, no further petition covering the same property for the SAME OR SIMILAR request shall be filed or considered within the period of one year from the date of the final decision. 2. DIVISION-OF-LAND Petition: In the event certain provisions are required as conditions of ap- proval, the owner of the subject property shall enter into an agreement with the City. The follow- ing is an outline of the procedure for such agreement: a. Page 1 of the covenant and agreement will be filled-in by the Planning Department. b. The covenant and agreement will be mailed to the owner or authorized agent. C. Upon receipt of the covenant and agreement, the record owner shall complete the form, have it notarized by a Notary Public and return it to the Planning Department. d. The covenant and agreement will then be recorded within one (1) year with the County Recorder by the City. CITY OF HUNTINOTON BEACH COUNCIL ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH _ 6 N SS)o r To Honorable Mayor and From Charles W. Thompson, Vr] City Council Members City Administrator Subject HISTORIC RESOURCES Date December 10, 1986 SURVEY REPORT The City Council has previously received a copy of the Historic Resources Survey Report prepared for the city by Thirtieth Street Architects. The report contains a great deal of information on all of the older structures in the downtown area, with recommendation as to the potential historic value of some of the buildings. The Heritage Committee of the Huntington Beach Historical Society has worked with the consultant in the preparation of this.report. -Staff would recommend a study session to review the report on January 19, 1987, at 6:00 P.M. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Mike Adams of our Redevelopment.Office at 536-5542. Respectfully submitted, Charles W. Vomft ',v R�,g City Administrator j CWT/MA:lp 2927h Fan CITY OF HU NTI NGTON .BEACH CA 87-4 COUNCIL ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - - - To Honorable Mayor and From Charles W. Thompson, City Council Members City Administrator Subject MAIN—PIER REDEVELOPMENT Date January 12, 1987 MASTER PLAN & HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY .As part of the city's redevelopment planning process, the services of various consultants have been retained. Two of these contracts called for the preparation of reports for Council/Agency consideration. These reports are the Main—Pier Redevelopment Master Plan prepared by 3D%International and the Historic Resources Survey Report prepared by Thirtieth Street Architects. These documents have been previously distributed to Council for review and an additional copy of each report has been attached to this communication. Representatives of both 3D/I (Norman Hoover) and Thirtieth Street Architects (Jill Sterrett) will be present to discuss their respective reports. Members of the Heritage Committee of the Huntington Beach Historical Society will also be present to make recommendations on the implementation of an ongoing historic preservation program. Staff will be prepared to lead a discussion on the follow through and implementationbf each report's recommendations. If you have any questions concerning these reports, please contact Mike Adams of our Redevelopment Office.. Respectfully submitted, r es W. Thompson, City Administrator CWT/MA:lp Attachments: Main—Pier Redevelopment Master Plan prepared by 3D/International Historic Resources Survey Report prepared by Thirtieth Street Architects Letter from the Heritage Committee of the H.B. Historical Society, dated January 12, 1987