Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Old Civic Center Site Project - Request For Proposals
` ui .��.- P �, CITY OF � l BEACH .t PLANNING , • M" ' Fileo � irr, �s y Y P. R r�s+iru,t♦ rj{ trrik k '�"M' g� P v �' t�J � t., �4� 'l .,� �x ►.7"1���4 e� ti�,�F�h�"� .T�'�a�l t�ttl�.�;t;.e�,"��� }i �s t i�..� �r.�l� i� �' 'J -yid'' I" '- - • • Year • j ll j ` / at. Y�', �. ♦ C g :+ ` ii. "� � �,r��'�� ���I'1;:F'r�`jS�;;�„ T 4i4�� �" ✓ ;'L li �i i, � i i �h�"� r; i. "L 9 lt.� t i•�, r � • • • Subject KMMM •► * �� �tk�7J; • lo dr. � �M • MESA . ' r/7 e • �L'_��� 1. era _ AL Am NMIII s 4 CITY OF HunTinGTon BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES �- P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 November 29, 1978 SUBJECT: SENIOR CITIZEN COMPLEX AT OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the supplemental information packet for the subject project including: 1 . Time Schedule for completion of Project 2. Program Design for Senior Citizens Recreation Center; and 3. Soils Investigation Report. This completes the distribution of information regarding the senior complex. I would be pleased to meet with you to review the schematics of your proposal. If you should wish to make an appointment to do so, or if you should have any questions., please contact me at (714) 536-5541. Very truly yours, Stephen V. hler Senior Co unity Development Specialist SVK:gc - Enclosures (3) 3� i .. 4 PECAN AVENUE f---- a. c. parking area 12 2 �as MEMORIAL HALL 2 story masonary/stucco za--,® 85 s, W Z W W 62 Q 31 temporar �25 Z W 31 trailers Q H X 4n grass area so CLINIC 24 ' � 1 story/temp. key 74 ® �25 NIN 27 28 27 ORANGE AVENUE 3 OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE : SOUTH • iN I�I NIIAN pdNMNN! I�NN�1 lUN NIH I N IIGN 'N lI OR IIIIIIIII In NNII NINI I IINN SHII NNNN il_wI.. :. N I gNN�NM�IINNNININ N t I HnIIMMMM MMHMMMM IYN � NNN NNNNI� INNNYNN NNN�I� 11 IIMII MI III'IM IA I I I HMN MNIIIIIIM �N MNN'IIINN N II'INI NNNINIY IIIIIN�� • INHJ MM! IIiM HNI i MNII I� MIII�HnH��,�l�Hfi �w In INII fltlltl NIIY �NNNNN NNJNI� IHNYNIIN ilHl JINN NNAi IAII IHHn1AII IIINAIAh HAAIAIH VYN tttt�NYY YI�IIIIU IIIIIfMHIIM.M114�iI�N III�II� �IHI NMMIHfaI Hltl IIIH HIAAAIAA'YAA HNA NIN NNINNNII N NI NN 110Ny11 1 NIA on 1p IN of mul N HHMMNMN MIIIIINMM �11 1 YIIIAII � i INININ H III n N�I1 IN INN NIFAIIIE# N N'IAIIA 11 1 NI IIIIM HM WIPPRIMMINI MIN I N' H 11i1 YIIIAII IIiM pr'" sfl NN{IItlNNN �lNIII � 1M MI III I I '! AR N 1 11 IiI11MIM INNN �NNNNN INNIIIHIN Ni MMMMI M�AII �MMMMM MMMMIMM NMIMNMM NNNNN � NNNN NN NNANIAN 1111111� � ��Nii�MNII�III I'1111 II IIA MMN�IN NIIIBIIII � IAINNII�N NINN'N ItlgN INNNINNII �' '�' .' `, lump IIIIMMI IIII!!Ifl MMNINIIMI t 11111M! Ilti 111 IMIINII MWI IN 1 NIMHMBIM !�1 1111 f� IMIi Mop I�M 11 1111 II 111'I'A �,�' W M ; I' IIN� II r I 1 27 b A civic ti -1246, PECAN i STREET V' 240, J� W ru W� y center N IM6 75' 240 80' 75 - OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE huntington beach planning department note: all pal ns are 30"diam. 30r to 35' in height® V) zz--� v .�0 ® za. W LU OC 51� 5d c� H ® 19 zz- 8'bloc® ® ® 75.6 ( -1e WIT FIRE STATION H 521 ^ , x 460 37 H 1 story frame 2 story concrete i1.-0 ® 29 21F H ''`� W W PECAN AVENUE ` a. c. parking area OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE : NORTH c � - 27 . y C IV_IC PECAW STREET--. _ 1 240' W " W. W i LU i n H center. M { 1 75' 240' 80'__ 7Y OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE_ huntington beach planning department note:. all-palms.. ,� 30'to,35'_in heighti6- ,p. ati I ® 2a. W LIQ 5 ry1. �. 51, 5 N .. N 6 19 75� ®. 22--� W. block wall 75.6 ® 66.3 FIRE STATION._ _ ' 521 x o 46f 3e H 1 story frame R2 story concrete r _ 56 5' ® 75.6' 29' �? 211 . ` uxx Lu I' „ ? W PECAN AVENUE \a.c.. parking -area N 0LD CIVIC CENTER SITE : NORTH . I a! I�IIINNIIIIEfN' - .�IIINII �INNIIII�� N • NHTv NDN 111111 NN u!! .a NNIIt1 Ian I N d1NIINItll NIIIII 3111111111 �IH� �� jIIIII1NINq N�11 _ ,�Q �a��/ r� N�NIIIA�uIIU�itlllt lida'� .a�iA IAHIIIIIAA AAANIII� NIIyMII - ��� HAfwuI mumo 1 DONIS ' '��►����:�`���. pollflpgp W1NIII 10n1140, 1NNNNON mot ID1Al11Dl� NAI�tIAs HD N NIIN�lN NMI NNII�tIIN loopopN N1iuillm ploopgp uuN1NN1 10104 ANIINAH 91101NI All ooN NINNtfll NAIIHNAN NMI NnNN�1 nUNgNpA N11N1N11 IsIpINp1N NNNN111�gIl� llilim NNNAMIII 11111e11 lIInIINHHjlANlNllll N #NIINN 1 pN NNNNININ "INININ1111M glnN Moog � IN #N � NA111NN 1A im 1= 11m. minnpl 100111111 oil II NWT" N NMI � �C 1NN111N NIIIINIIAI ll Ilh IIINNll gItIIIIII�N"NIA � - ".4 (Noun 114 I IN MIIP"51 mjUINq UPI �I: II �IN 11N1111 1 NNId�I1N HINNDIIH tlNl paNi: NNNIt181 1111111 111111G ;lfnhilnun UN11NRNp eYAI: IIAi1111� �1111111 11//1i1 p ilillinwil NIHNNk4N DIN Yql- IIn111W�NIIIINgpI!��tnpl�ltiiN NIIIgpHIN nIINInNp IUII �a�lr R11A1N1�iNlll!!P�IIN�iiIIIIUAIIN 11IIII�AA nNnl NCI IIUdNNN1I,iIgilplll111 nHddilUl!, fNIlO�IIAII ANI��� pill - UIInA�'iiU NUNNiInN NNNAUftG NIINN�th 1IN111jID !NN !tllNAHlln NIINNIIIIN WIINInHN IpINnpN!! 1UI�1�11 NGi • nA�IntDl euN�uun NN6� ININNINN nnII1NNN NtN HA1I111H11 tgIIIANIiN NHN1HgN, ggN�nlN nnnNgNq '� - F. uppm NNIINnI1N WD-11110 1t1NIN i iumfluAA lual W All � NNHNund ugpnul uNglllld IIIIII iipi NEE - nIIIINIIHII IIIIl�IINrw � �INNNIIII NIlNlNIIIN NDI � . -•NNNNdtgl gpNlMUd��I N , gIIpNNnN A11NW� NCI nI1NNIIIN NIII�Nnn nii InNA�In non u DNI dIWAnN� p�pgpN NNNNNg(', q�INHll1 NNIINIIIIq 1� liIn olmmo HMIIII NIINNNDh 11HINNAN nINNIIIIII oil �'e � -HAA IIININIII!, ggllpolAl dddlidllq �� • = 11AIpN1 All1'nIN11N11(i'•NIIHIIIIHN•NIIIINAIIn,��I � ° ®CAI pgnpllnN IAUINN�N, gigllplipl ��IIINIINN pgl � - MINION IIINNHUUI nH11N1 G UIIIIANiIn IINIINHINN gilt 1®VpN4 ANgpgAn„uuIIIII oil Nip .` Ilml�Nlli� n011t!nnitni • • 1 ] • 1 , a t la EMI • I NOR II Rloill NIW IIII It 0 1 IN all l ea 1111llaal 111111 I� IIl NNI� �IIIa1Y IIIN 1�lalal IN11 e a ' 1 H 11 �nAAll 11 implopploppoppippolimp 1 �I Ill llllli I 'll 111 I I �I III li III IN I 11 II I!''ill I 11 lll'� • �q � I I 11 1 I lal all II 1 INE 11 Hum aAI�IA� nAAlullY IIN11 �IIAANA AAAAAAA Ill YAa IINII� Iaa�apA AAN�It� AA IwAAH AIAfAI AA A NtAI gA1HIIINq �1 AAllllll l� A IA AAaAaAa:IIIIIA�� • IAA M I IM YYU�I YAAI tAl NIIt�AAA +�IAAANIi m mAAII ulluniINI NAAAII IAAAA� aAArAlIA1 limplumpolumpI IAII NIAIAAAA IIAAA�g AAAAAAA Ill AAa AA�IIaY NIINAYIIN:.Allk'�iI�A A�IIe INN IIAI AIAAAIAIi IIaAAIIA IApIAA��NAIIAAA oil A gAYAIAAA AII�IIIIAAA �IIIA1111 11 �� A� �A — lollAA N gll�q;utl NIN IIINII 11111111�1 IAA imIIIIm A IA IHill m F lmm 0 son.pull YINIa Illl1m IIIIIIIHA 1 Rol P . A AAA�AI I !�! 6A� YAYYAAA IIYI A�� m''" ��N � lll�lll YAt�itlA �It1Y� SIMON1 fl Yillll �AIAA GIAII o ibmNe�11Y111YI 1YI1 III�YAI IItAt111Y III�I AYYAYI E. I �A WIIYYAA YAAAA� IIAYNYItAI� a AAYiI AAAAAAA AAA III �tAIIA YAA�AA AIAIAIIAA � IIIAI YAAI��A A Itl��YYY �Yall�l �" 0� Illll� AlIAA�A AAAR�A� I�IIIAIgI YHYYIIgfl ����� MUM ®AAA AYIpYIlIIBNIN F �►'�� II MTI�Y YNAIYYYI IYoa' lY YlAIIIAAI Alltlllt�l t �� t Attt �It �'i AAItl3 11AAIAlIA AAA AI A ''AA 1 Ifo 111111NII11110 A� AI IIIY glgl�' PECAN AVENUE �----- a. c. parking area ® 25 ® �VVLJJJ 1z 12 . 85 .MEMORIAL HALL .__. 2 story masonary/stucco 4 2 51 6ui D Z uj 31 temporar (E-}25 Z Lu 31 trailers Q F-� X in grass area LL LL 50 CLINIC 24 1 story/temp. _ ...... 74 25 27 27 ORANGE AVENUE OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE : SOUTH t CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OLD CIVIC CENTER SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING TIME SCHEDULE September, 1978 . Council approval of RFP (9/18/78) . Final preparation of RFP . Compilation of RFP distribution list • Investigation of advertising • Order site appraisal October, 1978 . Meeting with City Departments (Library, Recreation Parks & Human _Services) . Preparation of proposal review criteria . Distribution of RFP . Informational meetings with developers November, 1978 . Proposal preparation period . Arrange consultant economic review of proposals . Initiation of General. Plan Amendment and Specific Plan December, 1978 . Deadline for submission of proposals (December 22, 1978, 12:00 noon) . Interdepartmental review of proposals (staff screening) January, 1979 . Presentation of acceptable proposals to Redevelopment Commission (developer presentations) . Formulation of Redevelopment Commission recommendations . Initiation of EIR process and Zone Change February, 1979 . Presentation of Redevelopment Commission recommendations to City Council March - April, 1979 . Council selection of developer proposal . Initiation of negotiation with developer for participation/lease agreement Begin 60-day period for preparation of final proposal Page Two May, 1979 . Council approval of participation/lease agreement, EIR, and zoning . Developer begins working drawings June - September, 1979 Developer completes working drawings October - November, 1979 • Construction bid period • Demolition of buildings on site December, 1979 . Council approval of contractor January - September, 1980 . Construction period October, 1980 . Dedication and grand opening 4. Senior Citizens Center Staff a. Office space for a staff of 10, including a recep- tionist, is necessary. b. One separate office for, the center's director is necessary. 5. Game Room. a. Must accommodate two pool tables and one snooker table. 6. Meeting Rooms a. At least two and preferably three meeting rooms shall be provided. b. Each room should- accommodate 25-30 people at tables and 50 people in assembly seating. 7,. Additional Needs a. Storage space for folding tables and chairs. b. Reception area. C. Foyer/lounge at entry with easy, covered access to buses. d. Janitor' s closet. e. Restrooms with ladies "lounge" and handicapped equipment. f. Coat storage. g. Public address system in Assembly and with music in all rooms. h. All building components should be durable and require little maintenance. i. Transmission of interior noise should be mitigated. j . Entire building must be accessible to handicapped. k. Drinking fountains (inside & outside) & vending machine alcove. 8. Outdoor Activities a. Four shuffleboard courts. b. Outdoor seating. . C:: Outdoor eating area with kitchen access and separation from surrounding area. d. Parking for 70-75 cars. e. Easy access for charter buses. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROGRAM DESIGN SENIOR CITIZEN RECREATION CENTER OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE As part of the new senior citizen complex to be located on the City' s old Civic Center site will be a Senior Citizens Recreation Center to replace the existing facility at 17th Street and Orange Avenue. This new facility should encompass approximately 10, 000 square feet, and the program design for the building is as follows: 1. Assembly Room a. Seating capacity of approximately 400 at tables. b. Operable walls to divide space into at least two, preferably three smaller spaces. c. Access to kitchen is necessary, and when operable walls are closed one space should accommodate 80-100 people seated for lunch under the Transportation-Lunch- Counseling (T-L-C) senior feeding program. 2. Kitchen a. For use primarily for catered meals, coffees, teas, but should permit serving of "pot luck" meals with limited on-site preparation. b. Two warming ovens, sink, and commercial refrigerator, residential range/cook top. C. Generous counter top work space and storage. d. Access to assembly room and to outdoor space necessary. 3. Senior Outreach Program This program provides a variety of social services to home- bound seniors. The emphasis of this program is service to seniors at home, client contact does not occur at the Center; therefore . . . a. Office space for a staff of 15 is necessary. b. One separate office for the program coordinator is necessary. c. Office space for Council on Aging representative is necessary. NOVEMBER 22, 1978 PROJECT NO: A78-2657 — . FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE MAIN STREET, BETWEEN 5th AND 6th STREET. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA FOR CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Department of Planning and Environmental Resources P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 4o SOILS ENOINEERINM INC 1>110 AIRPORT.WA V - P.O. BOX =00110-LONG) NZACH. CALIF. 00001 - PNONQ 213/420-7000 2021-C THIRD fT11ttT - RIY90BIO9. CALIF. 02547 - P14011d0I 710/000-7270 /4& 60iL� EN0INEEANVCi.NC. Conw11110 Fo1II"I"6111h 0 November 22, 1978 Project Not .A79-2637 .. City of Huntington Beach Department of Planning and Environmental Resources P.-O. Box.190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: Mr. Stephen V. Kohler Senior Community.Development Specialist Reference: Senior Citizen Housing Development Old Civic Center Site Main Street, between Sth and 6th Street Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Kohler: Presented herewith is our Report of Preliminary Foundation Investigation conducted.on the site of the Senior Citizen Housing Development to be located at the above referenced site. The investigation..was planned in accordance with the plans.and information furnished to us by your office. It is understood that the proposed structures will mainly consist of 1 to 3 story wood frame construction. . Maximum column and wall loads of 80 kips and 2.5 kips per lineal foot, respectively, have been assumed and utilized in our calculations. Prudent evaluation of. site conditions has been made with regard to the structural aspects of the proposed development. Respectfully submitted, ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. vie d Richard L. Manning, Jr. Sy Z. Ahmad Project Engineer R. E. #16621 RLM:sda cc: S SCOPE The, purpose of this investigation was to determine the surface and subsurface soil conditions on the site and to obtain information on which to base recommendations for site development and for designing adequate foundations for the proposed Senior - Citizens Housing Development. _ The results of the field investigation and laboratory study, upon which our recommendations are based, are contained in the Appendix to this report. The recommendations contained In the report reflect our best estimate of soil conditions at the time of drilling only, and based upon information obtained from the limited number of test borings performed. It is not to be construed as a warranty of the condition of the soil in other areas or at other depths. Should any unusual conditions - become apparent during grading or foundation construction, this office should be contacted for instructions prior to continuation of the work. The owner or his representative should make sure that the information and recommendations contained in this report are called to the attention of the project architect and engineers and incorporated into the plans, and that the necessary steps are taken to confirm that the contractors carry out such recommendations in the field. This report is subject to review by the controlling authorities for the project. This office should be notified should any of the following, pertaining to final site development occur. 1) Final plans for site development indicate utilization of areas not originally proposed to receive future structures. 2) Structural loading conditions vary from those utilized for evaluation and preparation of this report. 3) The site is not developed within 12 months following the date of this report. 4) Change of ownership of property occurs. -- Should any of the above occur, this office should be notified and provided with finalized plans of site development. Provided information would be reviewed and necessary recommendations for additional work and or updating of the report provided. Any charges for such review and necessary recommendations would be at the prevailing rate at the time of performing review work. O A P A78-2657 Page 2 7ILS ENOINHEFW4Q.ING r SITE LOCATION AND CONDITIONS LOCATION The site is located an the property of the old Civic Center on Main Street, between Sth and 6th Street, In Huntington Beach, California. The following information pertaining to site conditions was obtained during the course of performing field work for this project. 2. BOUNDARY CONDITIONS -- The property site is bound on the north by Main Street, and an the mouth by Orange Street. The site is bound on the east and west by Sth Street and 6th Street, respectively. 3. SURFACE CONDITIONS The area of investigation has a generally uniform level grade. Numerous buildings are presently situated on the site (refer to Plot Plan, Plate MAM) and visually appear to be in good condition. An asphaltic paved street (Pecan Avenue) was noted running across the site in a direction parallel to Orange Avenue. Several paved parking lots were also noted on the site. In general, asphaltic pavements visually appeared to be in fair to good condition. The balance of the site is covered by lawn, landscaped plants, and numerous trees (mostly large palm trees). 4. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Subsurface exploration disclosed no fill soils on the site at test boring locations. Surface natural soils are classified as silty and clayey sands, sandy silts and silty clays, with deeper seated natural soils classified as sands. �v0 ��s A78-2657 Page 3 P / 601L9 E1JC31NEEF1INO.ING SITE LOCATION AND CONDITIONS - continued 5. GROUNDWATER AND CAVING Groundwater was encountered at a depth of 35 feet below existing grade, as determined in test boring no. 1. Measurements taken in test boring nos. 3, 4, and 5 were to the level of drillers mud slurry only. The slurry was utilized to minimize any potential hole closure during drilling. _The level of driller's spud slurry continued to fall during the period of monitoring and therefore did not reflect depth to groundwater fable. - However, the level of driller's mud slurry did stabilize at a depth of 34 feet below existing grade, potentially indicating the presence of a water table. 6. UTILITIES No overhead or underground utilities were encountered during the performance of field work for this project. However, overhead power lines were noted servicing buildings on the northern 1/2 of the site, and underground utility lines are probable. It is understood an oil production line may run through the site. 7. GENERAL A detailed description of soils encountered and conditions experienced during the performance of subsurface exploration is shown on the appended boring logs. STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS The following preliminary structural information is understood to apply for this project - (as provided via phone conversations with Steve Kohler) and was considered in our evaluation. 1. It is understood that the site will be used for residential development consisting of 1 to 3 story wood frame construction. e A78-2657 Page 4 COO P 30ILS ENGINEERING.AJG 1 STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS - continued 2. It is understood that slab on grade construction will be utilised. 3. It is understood that several of these structures may have a subsurface garage. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. GENERAL Based on a review of site conditions disclosed during the performance of field -- work, and evaluation of available laboratory test data, the following recommendations are provided. 2. SITE PREPARATION Prior to grading, the following items should be performed. 2-1 Organic Growth: 2-1.1 Trees: Trees which lie in areas of future construction must be removed. Such removal must include rootballs and any attendant root systems. 2-1.2 Surface Vegetation: Grass turf should be stripped and disposed of off site. Stripping should penetrate three to six inches into surface soils. Any soil sufficiently contaminated with organic matter (such as root systems or strippings mixed into the soils) so as to prevent proper compaction shall be disposed of off site or set aside for future use in landscape areas. e�9 • A78-2657 Page 5 m v 30ILS ENOINEERINO.ING RECOMMENDATIONS - continue 2. SITE PREPARATION - continued -- 2-2 Existing Structures: 2-2.1 Demolition: Slabs on grade and foundation systems from demolished structures should be oompletely removed before grading operations commence. 2-2.2 Oversize Material: No concrete from demolished structures, structure foundations, or encasing may be used in compacted fill without the approval of the foundation engineers. Approval. would be dependent W feasibility of reducing concrete pieces to manageable sues (six inch maximum), and feasibility of placing such oversized material at a minimum of two feet below elevation of future footing bottoms. 2-3 Existing Asphaltic Concrete Pavement: Any existing streets and paved parking areas designated for removal shall. be stripped from the site and associated concrete curbs and walks completely removed. Such removed asphalt paving and concrete fragments should be disposed of off site unless it can be reduced to manageable sizes specified in section 2-2.2 above. Reuse would be subject to the above referenced section. 2-4 Utilities: Any underground utilities should be cut-off a minimum of 4 feet beyond the edge of future buildings. As an alternate, deep hollow lines .may be left in place provided they are filled with concrete. No filled line should be permitted closer than 2 feet from the bottom of future footings. �o A78-2657 Page 6 P SOILS ENOINEEF%ING.INC. 11 RECOMMENDATIONS - continued ' 2. SITE PREPARATION - continued 2-4 Utilities: - continued The ends of cut-off hollow fines should be plugged a minimum of 5 feet with concrete exhibiting minimum shrinkage characteristics to prevent water migrating to or from hollow. lines. In addition, capping of lines may be required should the plug be subject to any line pressures. 2-5 Abandoned Wells: The condition of any previously abandoned wells if encountered should be researched to ensure that proper cut-off depths, and plugging and capping operations were performed. 2-6 ' Oil Contaminated Soils: Should any sumps or oil contaminated soils be encountered, it would be necessary to remove soils sufficiently contaminated with oil to prevent proper compaction to full depth. Contaminated soils should be disposed of off site. 3. GRADING After completion of the above preparatory items, grading may commence. 3-1 Slabs on Grade: Natural soils in areas of future slab on grade construction should be _ scarified 12 inches and recompacted to previously specified percentages and moisture contents prior to replacing any removed old fill. The above specified scarification and recompaction of site surface soils would also be required prior to placement of any fill if needed to achieve subgrade elevation. �o �,'P A78-2657 Page 7 �e v sotL9 ENOINEEFW4G.M1C. RECOMMENDATIONS - continued 3• GRADING -continued 3-2 Backfill: Existing site soils encountered in test borings were generally clean and are considered suitable for reuse. However, should any deleterious material be encountered, it would be necessary to clean such material from excavated soils prior to reuse. Excavated material approved for reuse should be deposited in 6 to 9 Inch loose lifts and recompacted to 90 percent of maximum density at near optimum moisture contents. 3-3 Imported Soils (if needed): Any imported soil required to complete grading operations should.consist of granular low expansive material which exhibits an expansion index of not greater than 20 when tested in accordance with U.B.C. 29-2 Expansion -- Index Test Procedures. 3-4 Tests and Inspections: Grading, compaction, and utility line backfill operations should be performed in the presence of a field representative of this office. An adequate number of field den.;ity tests should be taken to ensure compliance with this report and local ordinances. - If it is determined during grading that soils require reworking to greater depths, for safe support of the proposed structure, this additional work should be performed as directed in the field. �o yov' A78-2657 Page 8 c P SOILS ENGINEEFNNG.tNC, RECOMMENDATIONS - continued 3. GRADING - continued 3-4 Tests and Inspections: - continued Imported fill soil should be inspected by a representative of this office prior to being hauled to the site. Maximum density for control of grading shall be determined In accordance with ASTM D1557-70 test procedures. 4. SHRINKAGE AND SUBSIDENCE The upper 3 to 6 inches of surface soils may not be suitable for use as structural fill due to organic contamination. Nominal volumetric shrinkage may be expected as'a result of soil compaction. Site subsidence caused by clearing and compaction operations will also occur. An average value of 0.1 feet is recommended for earth yardage calculations. An estimated 5 cubic yard wastage should be considered for each tree rootball system removed. Losses due to removal of structure foundations, slabs, pavement, and abandoned utility lines will also occur, however such losses are dependent on the extent of -- material removed and therefore cannot be accurately estimated at this time. Total estimated site shrinkage should be calcualted by combining all the above values. The estimates given herein should be verified during grading. �90 &A78-2657 Page 9 7/4 309-0 ENOWEEPNNO,IPIG C RECOMMENDATIONS - continued -- 5. DESIGN VALUES 5-1 Bearing Capacities: Respective, safe, dead plus live load allowable bearing pressures of 1900 and 2100 pounds per square. foot may be used in design of continuous and spread footings when placed on firm bearing natural stills, and when embedded la inches below lowest adjacent finish subgrade. A one third increase in the above bearing pressures may be used when considering - short term loading from wind or seismic sources. No footing should be built less than 12 inches wide. Inspections of the footing trench excavations should be performed by a representative of this office to confirm embedment into, and placement on competent bearing natural soils, and to ensure any loose or caved soils are cleaned from footing bottoms prior to placement of reinforcing or concrete. 5-2 Settlements: Total settlements for footings placed on approvefi bearing soils are not expected to exceed 1 inch. Differential settlements may be determined _-_ by comparing estimates for total settlements as presented in the following table for varying finished floor s,tbgrade elevations and loading conditions. TABLE OF ESTIMATED SETTLEMENTS Finish Floor Footing Load Settlement - Subgrade Type Condition Inches Existing Grade Continuous 2.5 if 0.5 Existing Grade Spread 80k 1.0 *Partial Basement Continuous 2.5k/if 0.4 +Partial Basement Spread 80k 0.8 o *Finish floor subgrade elevation taken at 5 feet below existing grade. v A78-2657 Page 10 a 304LB ENOINEEFUNG.Mir- e RECOMMENDATIONS - continued 5. DESIGN VALUES 5-2 Settlements: - continued Should the structural loading conditions vary by more than 10 percent from those assumed for this project, this office should be notified for further evaluation and recommendations as necessary. 5-3 Lateral Resistance•. Lateral resistance may be computed by use of a passive pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of embedment into compacted fill soils, and a friction coefficient of 0.35 between concrete and the supporting soil. 6. FLOOR SLABS Floor slabs may be safely supported on soils reworked as described in the Grading - section of this report. Any slab to receive.a moisture sensitive floor covering should be placed on an impermeable membrane topped with two inches of clean, coarse sand, or on 4 inches of open-graded gravel. 7. EXPANSIVE SOIL PRESSURES Site surface soils exhibit very low expansive soil characteristics. However the degree of expansion should be confirmed after completion of rough grading operations. 8. PLANTERS Any planter areas placed adjacent to perimeter footings should be provided with. false bottoms, or other devices, to divert water away from foundation and slab subgrade soils. Excessive lateral water movement to or from such soils might unnecessarily increase differential settlements. This concludes the recommendations. The appendix follows. v q� • A78-2657 Page I P ;OILS ENOINEEMNQ.ING APPENDIX The following Appendix contains the substantiating data and laboratory test results to complement the engineering evaluations and recommendations contained in the report. Plate "A" Plot Plan Plate 'B-1" thru "B-5" Boring Logs -- Plate "C-111 thru "C-61' Load-Settlement Curves Plate "D-111 thru "D-6" Direct Shear Tests SITE EXPLORATION. On October 31, and November 1 and 2, 1978 field explorations were made by drilling 5 i test borings at the approximate locations indicated on the attached Plot Plan, Plate "A". A truck mounted rotary mud type drilling rig equipped with a pump capable of circulating a bentonitic "drillers mud" slurry and 6 inch diameter soil type drill bit was used to advance 3 of the 5 bore holes to depths of 25 to 40 feet from existing grade. A truck mounted drilling rig equipped with a 6 inch diameter continuous flight auger bit was used to advance 2 of the 5 bore holes to a depth of 30 and 40 feet from the existing grade. Description of the soils encountered, depth of undisturbed cores, field density and field moisture content are given on the Log of borings for the test holes. Undisturbed samples of soils were extracted in a barrel sampler with tapered cutting shoe. ,The undisturbed soil retained in 2.5 inch diameter by one inch rings within the sampler was tested in the laboratory to determine in-place density, moisture content, shear resistance and settlement characteristics. Continuous observations of the materials encountered in the borings were recorded in - the field. The soils were classified in the field by visual and textural examination and these classifications were supplemented by obtaining bulk soil samples for future examination in the laboratory. All samples were secured in moisture-resistant bags as soon as taken to minimize the loss of field moisture while being transported to the laboratory and awaiting testing. After the samples were visually classified in the laboratory, a testing program that would provide sufficient data for our analysis of the soils was established. • A78-2657 I P 301LB ENOINEEFUNO.INC. APPENDIX - continued LABORATORY TESTS Direct shear and consolidation tests were performed on selected undisturbed core samples to determine the shear strength and settlement characteristics of various soil samples. LABORATORY TEST RESULTS MAXIMUM DENSITY TEST RESULTS The following maximum density tests were conducted in accordance wlth ASTM D1557- 70 Method A of test using 5 equal layers, 25 blows each layer, 10 pound hammer, 18 inch drop in a 1/30 cubic foot mold. Test Hole Depth, Maximum Optimum Material Number Feet Density, pcf Moisture, % Classification - 1 0 - 4 128.0 9.0 SM 2 0 - 4 131.5 8.0 SM - ML EXPANSION DETERMINATION Expansion tests were performed on selected soil samples to determine the swell characteristics of typical site materials and the following results were obtained for 144 _- pounds per square foot surcharge load. The expansion test was conducted in accordance with Uniform Building Code Standard No.. 29-2. Expansion Index Test. Maximum Opt Molded Molded Density Moist. Dry Moisture % Expansion Expansion - Location pccf % Density Content Saturation Index Classification T. H. 1 128.0 9.0 122. 1 9.3 65.2 0 Very Low 0- 4 T. H. 2 131 .5 8.0 120.6 9.1 54.7 0 Very Low 0 - 4 u° Al o°\P A78-2657 11 by P SOILS ENGINEERING,WM i A111& 2b�� ,e o o � Z IWPtcY ! ul i �.Ga►N LAVE. � x z liKor I L-VI L-ae.. ►T I oN V Y14 f . i NFL - ,� g LN OF 0MINU FCAP111 i i u 1 Adi I See note below PWKCT A78-2657 VIv. See note below MW 110�1t 01 'FuI. None Y1g 0ft"D 11-2-78 «H� c�w�ws�►Nr urw�raor ��+w► M (2) (8) n i r r r i TEST HOLE NO. 1 0.0-1 .0 SANDY SILT - Brown to dark brown, borders M silty sand (SM) - damp 1.0-3.0 SILTY SAND - Brown, borders sandy silt SM 2.0 15 * 10.5 (ML) , with a trace of clay, with trace roots (to 1/4" diameters) - moist 3.0-5.0 CLAYEY SAND - Brown, with a trace of . SC 3.0 30 115.5 112.4 rootlets - calcareous - moist r 5.0-9.0 SILTY CLAY - Brown, light brown to light CL 5.0 24 117.4 14.3 gray brown below 7 .0' , with a trace of 8.0 27 111.8 14.3 sand - moist, moist to wet below 7.0' 9.0-9.5 SA14DY CLAY - Light brown - moist CL 9.5-11 .5 FINE SAND - Light brown, with a trace SP-SM of silt - damp 11 .5-40.0 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND - Gray and rust - I SP 13.0- 49 95. 1 3.1 damp, moist to wet below 36' 18.0 34 23.0 35/6" * 3.6 28.0 33 - I KEY: 1) Blow Count 2) Dry Density, pcf 3) Moisture Content, % NOTE: Blow counts as determined by droppLng a 140. 1b. hammer through a height of 30 in es on a 2.5 inch I.D. sampling device. Rec ded blows are for 12 inches of penetration, cept as noted. *Indicates unsuccessful attempts made in retrieNing undisturbed core sample. Bulk sample taken whe e possible for visual classification and moisture determination only. I PLA1i �- 1 -- o v _:OtL9 E�JC3tIVEERINO.IIVG • LOG OF BORING 'r4n I 1 If 1 AM t Not encountered PWJW A78-2657 rAVING None experienced TRW NOIl NO. 2 DI III II W Fill None OAT9 ORWW 11-2-78 " " you aaa**& or ara ee wuis�. i TEST HOLE NO. 2--- - ----- ._._. 0.0-1 .0. ! SILTY CLAY - Brown to dark brown, borders CL clayey silt, with a trace of sand - moist 1 .0-2.0 FINE. SAND - Brown, with a trace of silt - SP-SM damp 2.0-4.5 SANDY SILT - Brown, with a trace of ML 2.0 35 116.5 9.3 clay, clay percentages increase with 3.0 46 118.& 10.5 depth - damp to moist 4.5-11 .0 SILTY CLAY - Brown, light gray brown CL 5.0 33. 112.0 16.3 below 8.5' , lensed with trace sands - 10.0 18 97.0 24.2 calcareous at 10' - moist, wet below 8.5' 11 .0-12.5 FINE SAND - Brown to light brown, SP-St, with a trace of silt - damp 12.5-15.0 FINE SAND - Gray and rust - damp SP - 15.0-30.5 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND - Gray and rust I SP 15.0 40 105.5 3.6 20.0 59/9.5 ' _ I 25.0 53/8.5 30.0 . 30/6" 94.9 2.6 I i ,K EY: 1) Blow Count 2) Dry Density, pcf 3) Moisture Content, b II NOTE: Blow counts as determined by dropp ng a � 140 lb. hammer through a height of 30 inc es on ? a 2.5 inch I.D. sampling device. Record blows - ; are for 12 inches of penetration, except s I noted. i J *Indicates unsuccessful attempts made in etrieving undisturbed core sample. Bulk sample tak n where possible for visual classificaiton and mo sture determination only. i i PLAN • 2 9 - v t:O,l4 E�X3iniFFa,Nr:.IN^. LOG Of Di1NN wn 11 14 1 AW L i C A78-2657 _ CAVING � Mt M 1 - cont'd 0 1 P 111 M FILI Out ORILI" SOIL I uwiuo 1 OWMK M iMt ( TEST HOLE NO. 1 - continued ! WATER TABLE AND CAVING NOTES: i -- After completion of drilling to a depth 401 , test boring closed to 35' below exi ing grade -- bottom of hole wet in moisture ntent . After 15 minutes had transpired, bottom hole at 35' and saturated in moisture content indic ting approximate level of groundwater table. I I i I I i I II — I I I � I I i _ I I I 1 I, I I' I II I 1 PLAT[ S 1 - ont'd -- o UP v ':OLL.S E�JC..II.1EEq�I.1p.IPlC• LOG OF OwQ r All k 1ABLE See note below VMMCT A78-2657 (AviNG See note below I= IOU M. 3 Of PT Of fltL None DAV9 ONAUD 11-1-78. SOIL CLYNIK1tlOp IuMll{OI TEST HOLE NO. 3 0.0-1.0 16" ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEHENT ON 6" 1AGGREGATE BASE 1.0-5.0 SILTY SAND - Brown to dark brown, borders SM 2.0 26 113.2 9.3 sandy silt (ML) , trace of organics at 3.0 ' 13 110.1 9.3 2.0' - moist 5.07-11 .0 SILTY CLAY - Brown, with sand, gradationa CL 5.0 36 116.1f 13.0 contact with above silty sand .horizon, . 8.0 41 118.8 115.6 -sand percentages decrease with depth - moist - 11 .0-13.0 FINE SAND - Brown with light brown, with SP 6 lens of clay (CL) at 12' - moist CL 13.0-18.0 FINE :0 MEDIM SAND - Light brown, with SP-SM 13.0 53 107.8 12.4 a trace of silt - ,moist 18.0-39.5 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND - Light brown, light ( SP 18.0 52/7.5 101.9 21.7 gray brown below 28' - wet to saturated II 23.0 43 26.0 50/5" * 19.1 39.0 52/6" * 23.4 KEY: 1) Blow Count 2) Dry Density, pcf h 3) Moisture Content, ! II, _ I i INOTE: Blow counts as determined by dropp ng a 250 lb. hammer through a height of 18 inc es on a 2.5 inch I.D. sampling device. Reco ded - ' blows are for 12 inches of penetration, cept las noted. I *Indicates unsuccessful attempts made in 1etrie ng ! undisturbed core sample. Bulk sample tak n for visual classificaiton and moisture determ natio ; only, where possible. i i j MATE O 3 •� I i v :;p19 E�N:INF.EiiM1C3.INr:. - OFIM wn i i N 1 Ael L PRQJWT A78-2657 (AVI vG UK "M NO.3 - cont'd _ ur P i r o OF I ILL i n a i i•„ I *OIL C6&"4vK..NN ,Y«$I6"& OWNS" M 6" (iD t/D (3) iM/[!, I • TEST HOLE NO. 3 - continued WATER TABLE AND CAVING NOTE: After completion of drilling operations, he bore hole was partially bailed of driller s mud and the following tabulated measurem is were recorded. Bottom of Depth to Date Time Hole ; Driller's rks i 11-1-78 2:30 pm 34°.0' Bai hole f dril er's m 11-2-78 8:15 am 38.0' 34.0' Dep to dr ler's Ud app ra st le. i - I � i I A ; i i I MAW • 3 - iont'd - o a ::Ott_B ENOIfVEERINp.M1G L06 .(f BORN WAIT k IABIE See note below PNDJ Ct A78-2657 CAVING None experienced TAT MW NO. 4 UI PIH Of FILL None GIAR BAD 11-1-78 i (s1 ui•rn *OIL �c�.u[nc�►Nr r"w[sor go" ���► o�sa TEST HOLE NO. 4 I 0.0-2.0 ISILTY.SAND - Brown to light brown, border Sa sandy silt, with a trace of clay - damp 2.0--3.0 SILTY SAND - Light brown, with clay, SM 2.0 70/10" 122.0 8.1 with trace organic material - moist 3.0-5.0 CLAYEY SAND - Brown with gray brown and SC 3.0 72/10" 123.0 9.3 rust - damp 5.0-8.5 SILTY CLAY - Light brown to brown, with CL 5.0 40 118.2 15.6 a trace of sand - moist - 8.5-10.0 FINE SAND - Light brown with light brown SP - moist 10.0-25.5 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND - Light brown, light SP 10.0 47 108.8 11.1 gray brown below 20' - wet, saturated 15.0 48/6" 107.2 19.1 with depth 20.0 50/6" * 4.7 25.0 50/6" 101.8 17:0 KEY: 1) Blow Count 2) Dry Density, pcf � 3) Moisture Content, % I NOTE: Blow counts as determined by dropp ng a 1250 lb. hammer through a height cf 18 inc es on a 2.5 inch I.D. sampling device. Recorde blow are for 12 inches of penetration, except s not *Indicates unsuccessful attempt made to r triev undisturbed core sample. Bulk sample tak n where possible for visual classification and mo sture determination only. i I i i I 14 ATE 9 4 OU � q ; v :iO.l.9 ENGNEERMYO.MIC. . Los OF 000" WAIT N IA81I PODA= A78-2657 CAVIN(i VW "M NO. 4 - cont'd DIPTN Of FILL RATK DRUAM 11-1-78 u.rtn I II� `1� (3) (3) w F t t r W� i�NIMt�MIr r WMIrM 111r11� M~ oM�M TEST HOLE NO. .4 - continued WATER TABLE AND CAVING NOTES: After completion of drilling operations t e bore hole was partially bailed of drillers mud and the following tabulated measurements were ecorded. Bottom of Depth of Date Time Hole Drillers Remark - 11-1-78 11:15 am 25.0' 19.0' B iled ho a of d illers aud 11-2-78 8:00 am 25.0' 22.5' j I I I t I MAIN R' 4 - cont'd -- o P v rows EPJQiNEF%rnx.;,1Nf_ LOG wAIIR TABLE See note below PQQA= A78-2657 CAVING See note below 5 OI PTM OF FILL None DATE ONUM 10-31-78, 11-1 8 uu• .. N�7M N .a. wu e6Mw6c&tHr tww§us wwK or raw• TEST HOLE NO. 5 0.0-4.5 SILTY SAND - Brown, with a trace of clay SM 2.0 24 122.4 13.0 - moist 3.0 21 124.0 13.0 4.5-8.0 SILTY CLAY - Brown to light brown, with CL 5.0 41 119.6 15.6 a trace sand - moist 8.0-12.0 FINE SAND -Brown to light brown, with P-SM 8.0 40 117.8 14.3 silt - wet 12.0-13.0 SILTY CLAY - Light brown - stiff - moist CL 13.0-22.5 FINE TO MEDIUM SAND - Rust and gray - SP 13.0 37/6" 102.2 19.1 wet to saturated 18.0 53/6" 105.9 21.2 22.5-23.0 SANDY CLAY - Gray brown, borders clayey CL sand - moist 23.0-23. 5 FINE SAND - Gray with rust, with a trace SP-SC 23.0 30/6" 114.8 14.3 of clay - moist 23. 5-28.0 FINE SAND - Gray with rust, with lenses SP 23.5 30/3" or layers of fine to coarse sand below 26 feet - moist 28.0-39. 5 ! FINE TO MFJ)IU11 SAND - Light gray brown, SP 28.0 45/6" 106.3 19.1 ! gray to blue gray below 39' - saturated 33.0 60/8" 100.2 22.0 39.0 40/6" 110.2 - 19.1 I IKEY: 1) Blow Count 2) Dry Density, pcf Ii 3) Moisture Content, % I' NOTE: Blow counts as determined by dropp ng a 250 lb. hammer through a height of 18 inc es on a 2.5 inch I.D. sampling device. Reco ded blows are for 12 inches of penetration, cept las noted. I I i 1 P4ATE a 5 - o v loy� • - v :01L9 E�IGIfVEEOMNO.INf Lao OF MINI —� WA11 H IABLE T A78-2657 CAVING TM 69" MO. 5 - cony d OLPTH of FILL DATt OQMLSD J , n.IA.�YiriJY w��+IL=�.�� _ .•• M.a •.ate.-w".e GOAL •vaM" M eMa H r SIT TEST HOLE NO. 5 - continued WATER TABLE AND CAVING NOTES: After completion of drilling operations t1le bore hole was partially bailed of drillers mud and the following tabulated measurements were ecord W. Bottom of Depth of Date Time Hole Drillers d Remarks ' 11-1-78 8:15 am 28.0' Ba led hol of dr lers 11-1-78 9:15 am 36.0' 28.5' 11-1-78 1: 15 pm 36.0' 30.0' 11-2-78 8:00 am 36.0' 32.0' 11-2-78 1:00 pm 36.0' 32.5' I I j I I I i I j MA19 B• 5 - cont'd 0 v OU � 0y - v GOILB E�K3iIJEEFMNO.Ih1G r CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROGRAM DESIGN SENIOR CITIZEN RECREATION CENTER OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE As part of the new senior citizen complex to be located on the City' s old Civic Center site will be a Senior Citizens Recreation Center to replace the' existinq facility -at 17th Street and .Orange Avenue. This new facility should encompass approximately 10, 000 square feet, and the program design for the building is as follows: 1. Assembly Room a. Seating capacity of approximately 400 at tables. b. Operable walls to divide space into at least two, preferably three smaller spaces. C. Access to kitchen is necessary, and when operable walls are closed one space should accommodate 80-100 people seated for lunch under the Transportation-Lunch- Counseling (T-L-C) senior feeding program. 2. Kitchen a. For use primarily for catered meals, coffees, teas, but should permit serving of "pot luck" meals with limited on-site preparation. b. Two warming ovens, sink, and commercial refrigerator, residential range/cook top. C. Generous counter top work space and storage. d. Access to assembly room and to outdoor space necessary. 3. Senior Outreach Program This program provides a variety of social services to home- bound seniors. The emphasis of this program is service to seniors at home, client contact does not occur at the Center; therefore . . . a. Office space for a staff of 15 is necessary. b. One separate office for the program coordinator is necessary. C. Office space for Council on Aging representative is necessary. 4. Senior Citizens Center Staff a. Office space for a staff of 10, including a recep- tionist, is necessary. b. One separate office for the center' s director is necessary. 5. Game Room a. Must accommodate two pool tables and one snooker table. 6. Meeting Rooms a. At least two and preferably three meeting rooms shall be provided. b. Each room should accommodate 25-30 people at tables and 50 people in assembly seating. 7. Additional Needs a. Storage space for folding tables and chairs. b. Reception area. C. Foyer/lounge at entry with easy, covered access to buses. d. Janitor' s closet. e. Restrooms with ladies "lounge" and handicapped equipment. f. Coat storage. g. Public address system in Assembly and with music in all rooms. h. All building components should be durable and require little maintenance. i. Transmission of interior noise should be mitigated. j . Entire building must be accessible to handicapped. k. Drinking fountainsk (inside_& outside) & vending machine alcove._ 8. Outdoor Activities a. Four shuffleboard courts. b. Outdoor seating. Outdoor eating area with kitchen access and 'separation from surrounding area. d. Parking for 70-75 cars. e. Easy access for charter buses.- r: • CITY OF HunTin (; TOn BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 APPROXIMATE DEVELOPMENT COSTS/FEES CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1. Environmental Impact Report Approximate consultant fees $ 10, 000. 00 Approximate City administrative fees 490. 00 r2. Use Permit Fee 75. 00 Drainage Fee ($600;0a. ) O 21,000. 00 4. Water Fee 30. 00/unit 5. Sewer Fee 60. 00/unit 6. County Sanitation District Fee 250. 00/unit 7. Cultural Enrichment Fee (2/3of fee to be rebated upon issuance of building permit) . 15/sq. ft. 8. Street Improvement Fee (Calculated for unimproved frontage) 50. 00/linear ft. 9. Parks and Recreation Fees Bachelor and efficiency 389. 00/unit 1 bedroom 492. 00/unit 2 bedroom 759. 00/unit 3 bedroom 1, 056.00/unit 10. Building Permit and Plan Check Fee (based on 6 million dollar project) 22,000. 00 • CITY OF HUnTmGTon BEACH J� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 _-� November 2 , 1978 SUBJECT: Request for Proposals : Senior Citizen Housing Gentlemen: . The City of Huntington Beach is seeking proposals for the construction of Senior Citizen Housing and a Senior Citizen Center on .City-owned property. Enclosed for your review please find a Request for Proposal which details the anticipated project and the necessary proposal contents. The City will use Housing and Community Development Block Grant funds to improve the 3 . 64 acre site and will lease it to the developer selected by the City Council . In addition to the contents of the Request for Proposal , please be advised of the following: 1 . An additional $145 , 000 will probably be available for the construction of the senior citizens center for a total budget of $450 , 000 . 2 . Parking requirements will be reduced to one space for ev`rv, three units , and the practical maximum allowable density is suggesto--' o be 150-233 u:zits . 3 . The rents -cor the subsidized units have been increased to $236/one be:`room and $280/two bedroom. The City is also seekin- a 20 percent increase in these rates . If your firm is interested in submitting a proposal , please inform us of your intention on your letterhead as soon as possible. The deadline for submitting proposals is December 22 , 1978 , at 12 : 00 Noon. If you should have any questions , please do not hesitate to phone me and I encourage you to meet with us prior to your. submission. I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly ours , Ste V. ohler Senior Cc unity Development Specialist SVK:dc enclosure r CEO Aglow 6Eaaes � sue.,aa n.,tee—Part w 13 ATTENTION DEVELOPERS THE CITY OF . HUNTINGTON BEACH Is seeking proposals for the construction of a Senior Citi- zens Housing and Senior Acti. vity Center complex to be constructed on City owned property. The City will provide Com- munity Development Block Grant Funds to clear and pro-. vide off-site improvements to the 3.64 acre site, and will lease the site to the developer selected at a nominal fee. Interested parties may contact the City of Huntington Beach for further details and a re quest for proposal packet at 714 536-5541 a • CITY OF HunTinGTOn BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES �._, • P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 1714) 536-5271 October 26, 1978 Mr. Syed Z. Ahmad, President Associated Soils Engineering Inc. . 3310 Airport Way P.O. Box 20056 .Long Beach, California SUBJECT: Soils Investigation, Old Civic Center Site Dear Syed: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of October 25, 1978, I am forwarding to you the enclosed description of the subject project. we anticipate that construction on this site will. be of wood frame, probably not exceeding three stories at the. south end of the site, and one story at the northern end of the site adjacent to the existing branch library. Of particular interest to us is establish ing the depth below surface at which lies the water table since underground parking is a possible alternative for this site. This letter constitutes your express written permission to enter the site and perform the soils investigation. Billing should be sent to my attention and shall not exceed $2, 500. Please let me know the date drilling is scheduled so that we may inform the appropriate agencies. I look forward to' working with you again, and please phone me at (714) 536-5541 if you have any questions : Very truly yours, Step V Kohler Senior C munity Development Specialist SVK:gc Enclosure l HN CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Floyd G. Belsito From Stephen. V K ,. Senior City Administrator Community v Specialist Subject Soils/Geology Date October 16, 1978 Engineering Services As part of the Senior Housing Complex proposed for the Old Civic Center Site, the City requires the services of a competent soil/geology firm to conduct a thorough investigation of soils condition on the site . I would like to recommend that Associated Engineering be re- tained to conduct this study. Associated has conducted previous similar studies for the City and has always completed such work in a competent and professional manner. Pursuant to Chapter 3. 03 , Section 100 of the Municipal Code (Professional Services: Contract for services less than $2 , 500) , I am requesting your approval of Associated Engineering to conduct the Old Civic Center Site soils/geology investigation. SVK:PT:gc C Bos Augts s Sun.,Oct.n,g8i8—Part yi 13 ATTENTION DEVELOPERS ,. THE. CITY. .OF HUNTIN T t� ON - Is -seeking proposals fo.r.the construction of -a Senior. Citi zens Housing.and .Senior. Acti- vity Center complex -to -be constructed on City'owned, property. The City will provide:Com. munity Development. Block ' Grant. Funds to clear and pro-. vide off-site improvements to' the 3' 4 -acre site,' and' will lease the site to the developer selected at a.nominal fee.. Interested parties may contact .the City of .Huntington Beach, for. further details and a re- quest for proposal packet at .. F 714 536-5541 A P� :E.'ril,• • ''.?�:x_� ^Irk City of Huntington Beach r1 ; P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92646 o"il 1J OFFICE OF THE MAYOR . Honorable Jerry M. Patterson October 5, 1978 Congressman 38th District Federal Office Building 34 Civ"i.c Center Plaza, No. 921 _ Santa Ana, California 92701 Subject: 100 Unit Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program Allocation Dear ongrl/� It is my pleasure to inform you that at its regular meeting of September 18, . 1978, the City Council approved the use of the City' s old Civic Center site. for senior citizens housing and a new senior citizens center. The City intends to use Housing and Community Devel- opment Block Grant funds to improve the site and make it available for lease at a minimal fee to a developer selected on a competitive basis. The developer would in turn be required to build approximately 200 apartment units for senior citizens and reserve 100 of these units for seniors participating in the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance 'Program. (A Request for Proposal is enclosed for your review. ) We would like to respectfully request your assistance in implementing this. project. As you know, Orange County received an allocation of only 40 senior certificates for Section 8 assistance for the next year. This allocation is obviously insufficient to permit us to pro- ceed with this project. Specifically, we need your assistance in forwarding our request for 100 units of Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance funding for this project to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development' s central office in Washington, D.C. We would like to suggest that this allocation be specifically assigned to this project, that all funds be reserved for senior citizens and the disabled, and that the Housing Assistance payments be made through the Orange County Housing Authority. Our staff is currently proceeding with the implementation of this pro- ject by assisting developers in preparing proposals. We invite you and your staff to contact Mr. Stephen V. Kohler, Senior Community Development Specialist, for further details regarding this project at (714) 536-5541. We greatly appreciate your past efforts on the behalf of the needy residents of Huntington Beach and look forward to working together on . the housing problems that confront us. Sincerely, `Ro "Shen" RS :SVK:df Mayor Enclosure w City of Huntington Beach • P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Honorabi�Robert .R. Badham October 5, 1978 Congressman, 40th District 1649 Westcliff Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 Re: 100 Unit Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program Allocation Dear 14rr—C-ongressman It is my pleasure to inform you that at its regular meeting of September 18, 1978, the City Council approved the use of the City' s old Civic Center site for senior citizens housing and a new senior citizens center. The City intends to use Housing and Community Development Block Grant funds to improve the site and make it available for lease at a minimal fee to a developer selected on a competitive basis. The developer would in turn be required to build approximately 200 apartment units for senior citizens and reserve 100 of these units for seniors participating in the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program. (A Request for Proposal is enclosed for your review. ) We would like to respectfully request your assistance in implementing this project. As you know, Orange County received an allocation of only 40 senior certificates for Section 8 assistance for the next year. This allocation is obviously insufficient to permit us to proceed with this project. Specifically, we need your assistance in forwarding our request for 100 units of Section 8 Leased -Housing Assistance funding for this project to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development' s central office in Washington, D.C. We would like to suggest that this alloca- tion be specifically assigned to this project, that all funds be reserved for senior citizens and the disabled, and that the Housing Assistance payments be made through the Orange County Housing Authority. Our staff is currently proceeding with the implementation of this project by assisting developers in preparing proposals. We invite you and your staff to contact Mr. Stephen V. Kohler, Senior Community Development Specialist, for further details regarding this project at (714) 536-5541. We greatly appreciate your past efforts on behalf of the needy residents of Huntington Beach and look forward to working together on the housing problems that confront us. ;Sin rely, Ron Shenkman Mayor RS:SVK:df Enclosure City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92649 N OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Honorable Mark W. Hannaford October 5, 1978 Congressman, 34th _District 5199 East Pacific Coast Highway Suite 300 N Long Beach, California 90804 Re: 100 Unit Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program Allocation Dear .M-r. It is my pleasure to inform you that at its regular meeting of September 18, 1978, the City Council approved the use of the City' s old Civic Center site for senior citizens housing and a new senior citizens center. The City intends to use Housing and Community Development Block Grant funds to improve the site and make it available for lease at a minimal fee to a developer selected on a competitive basis. The developer would in turn be required to build approximately 200 apartment units for senior citizens and reserve 100 of these units for seniors participating in the Section 8. Leased Housing Assistance Program. (A Request for Proposal is enclosed for your review. ) We would like to respectfully request your assistance in implementing this project. As you know, Orange County received an allocation of only 40 senior certificates for Section 8 assistance for the next year. This allocation is obviously insufficient to permit us to proceed with this project. Specifically, we need your assistance in forwarding our request for 100 units of Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance funding for this project to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment' s central office in Washington, D.C. We would like to suggest that this allocation be specifically assigned to this project, that all funds be reserved for senior citizens and the disabled, and that the Housing Assistance payments be made through the Orange County Housing Authority. Our staff .is currently proceeding with the implementation of this pro- ject by assisting developers in preparing proposals. We invite you and your staff to contact Mr. Stephen V. Kohler, Senior Community Devel- opment Specialist, for further details regarding this project at (.714) 536-5541. We greatly appreciate your past efforts on behalf of the needy residents of Huntington Beach and look forward to working together on the housing problems that confront us. Sincerely, 4on Shenkman Mayor RS :SVK:df Enclosure TELEPHONE(714)536-5553 1 ,t� +•4i. s il'�6;'t�ir i1• '"••° �' �. .ttf ' ,: Ir1A� 6yrF'4• rh,t+� ,+14i '} I " Vr 4tij � h t `h 2 tV y � •, I w�'': �'� I �.t�>L +4 7�?i'v U ,�' {fy'� y i�,y' ',y'y �� 9.•.•, yl` v �:� ��.��, ti: u� }, C cq ;lyia N:,:r i«�J ��� �}` I}� . v1 a:r;4y pR1 FR ' n,N\,) aYr�vhtr�ld t '� .4b�+ �r•' ,n, � 7+ t 1 e' + a Mry� '+` $�i!. a rl��, .." �a ONO Y .fit ww� N.:• �y Orr*yks ' � �r�}�13t . r 'f. '1.'g• N� Y �t a�ulodifica��oas in- ea � .,, �rra I Y'N.a�n7ry i •,, �tLi��t? i' � ,1 „ t 8' ,�51. I � i �n��f�, } ee% '} 1 1✓.� Fi I � , {1 y 1 ,t Y1 y�+� Vi�� r a tA de• usini ' , �l SPUR.t lYat�Nli m F ila �, I! r`!/y,��kl .`kP 'Q tiF,�,J t C i, ,8� � i{'i.''; ��"'�� ,• q „�a� Y vaq, day � •• �1,... a � ��� lyrt �1 ,. Y,1 ,. r seniof eft 4en Oke pro act pC ' Of about 185 uni Wpropos�t,fn PAive PO!V ,ih a tr ; ai 1BOulevard aW aits St add Ws Avenue. ..V ) y oY • � i � a'. , h ,• P.. �r'. u o 1 t'k' ', ,5fi+�• 1'a 4r.� '�t'__rf�y*l Ulti )'"rR Iti. ' .• if\s.'�.t t^S a'�(]]'��"�n k t � AR.T 4r�rt � a , t G:+{'s {� k � � 'f A �,irK iY.wr y.rF•(i g 1, " .. r' � Vie. f•,. r '+ � rfI "f :1r14�' rlr' •W% �y,�+ {' T •+�V c , I •>.ri n,' �... Oa w�,� `y���it"+:pwtAaµ��k� r�jh� �� , i� � t y iiv�t't� �'� iY'71°yff a t1 + v I 1 ryar r a gar F n �R A r. a ��R r rj Yxxi y� p'S , l CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH Charles Davis Stephen V. Kohle To Real Property Agent From Senior Community Deve� op- ment Specialist Subject OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE Date September 19, 1978 TITLE SEARCH On September 18, 1978, the Huntington Beach City Council approved the use of the Old Civic Center site as a location for senior housing/activity center complex. In order to expedite the progress of this project, would you please conduct a title search of the Old Civic Center property, - focusing particularly on any deed restrictions which might limit potential uses for this property. Any charges incurred in this research may be billed to CD -account #894. 771. Thank you. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me. SVK:PT;df iJ kv L E _ C►19 i C t ��� ''�. Bargain an4lole Deed CORPORATION Vbis Tudel tare, Made,the day of-- 21 in the year of our Lord nineteen hued an' Seventeen � Batwaen- rrracr-Bitiac�tnzr a Corporation organized under the laws of the State of__CaliforAls.,-...,and having I its principal place of business in the,...Cit.y._.of...LIIs--Angeleg--- -_--.-...County of. and State of.e.,...r.C�47 orD s_,_....,the party of th,e first part I ; Alid...TEE __1---coae.W�atiz�n.:a --tom--•= ' "�I�I I County.:of.--Oxange-r-,State--ot_ tl t3,1.e. .the part y, of the second part, I I With f etbt That the said party of the first pt%r4 for a�n�d w consideration of the-sum o �Twl... ---- --- --- ................ 310AD).,_ Dollars 0 gold coin of the United States of.America,to--it-.., .in hand paid by the said ill part._.y-_-of the second part,the receipt whereof is hereby aoknowledged,does by these- presents,grant,bargain and sell,convey and conflrm unto the said part.__V__,.of the second part and to..........1-ts......... -hers and assigns orever, t_ - - -- ----------- ' + all that...certain lo ._ piece-...or parcel..-..o land situate, lying and bein in the !I it __Cit ---- County of...Orange. and ! Illi State of-uallfoxnl.a=:.and bounded and particularly described as follows,to-wit of._t2�e__Cit�r---4f-Hunts ngtan--Beach,---ae xaBorc�ed_ _M+ Sn,aLraet Satio� -Block-Your---Bindr.ed-.and..nve.,,-t46 )s.=0•.Ox--tea•- in.8olc--Thraa. 431' l -P-age---Forty-three---4.43.1.,_91s allanem -.Ma;.s.,_--Beaorde--of_..said---Cmmty.._ j -of--Dr_ a State..oY-_Califnxnia_----•�-------- - ••--• .-• ----- ---- -- -•---- �, 1 ...is-.hexeby---cayezu�nL,�d-azu� s read. '.hayse`car...-mtlth..a..wwnasiL �- ,� -running.--yeith_the_land ibet maintain--ani keel--in gond_-�atditicsa=>;he__afAzeead�ropert�c:_as a �__ �� 3L8nio ...ta 1:RxiS1 Y4At A �a eT' E 1 . f An--1te.-Suwe8a SL nr- asei gns.,: .1t 0X..Us._eucces8oxs---ar..ass Saba]l_te---entitled.ACL b&4esilet� poaHe sioa__ths soY.:,.:.. . -------------- --._...---.._.. ..-....................... ----••-- ----- ----- ----- ---- -- --- •--•-----•---•----..................... t •-- ..... -_.. ........................... -----------------•••••-•-• i --- ----------------------*---- -------------------.-----.-. . ...........--.... i .............. ----- ------------------------- - - ----- - ------ - --- - -- -- --- -- -- -- -- ................................................... ---- -- -- ------------- �a --------- ------- ---------------------------- - .----------------- j� ogetber with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances I thereunto belonging,or in any wise appertaining,and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders,ren4,issues and proflts there o f Co 13aue aetA to 113611A, all and a_4ular,the said premises,together with the appur a I' nances,unto the said part__y_._of the second part,and to_ItA.......heirs and assi i� forever. �!I Tn Witness Whereof, they said party of the first part has caused its corporate name Ali and seal to be,affixed,by its 5resident and---Seaietwy....thereunto,duly authorized they 44y itndg"#r in this indenture first above written. r --- --- I;I l - By President. I I l k{ GS INS on o;.w.. ` - .. Y .. A.n.,1917 before me, � _ �C' �' ] .•_. ... . a Notary Public in and for the said tr/•i {11 V t',t County and State,residing therein,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared f ..................•-..........................known to me to be the V1f —President and.-----.._ ........................., known to me to bq the M :: Secretary of the ..........HuntIngton-.Bewh..Company-----------_-------------- _---• j the Corporation that executed the within Instrument;known to me to be the persons who executed the within Instrument,on behalf of the Corporation therein named,bad acknowledged to me that such Corporation executed the same. 1111 W101"S MOW% I have hereunto set my hand and Affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written. I Notary Pa43te to tuifl¢oy satflfl 609s i I •ACNNtIMLEOd.WENT--Corp:Pros.ms Sae.—MICOtt's otory Biooh-•nj I I I 1 .. I I� I i t I 1 ----------- "Al C %w I. 1+� J. J. t t. R. K 1. ..�"•x et ¢sFf«.� _ w . �. ..- � .. .. ... «. ..v,-.�"r3 't..a v » �.. _.� �r .y _y, F'...t :i+�.+.�...+�.•......+,mow:=;-.µ'a4C���y t +fsw�w+J.'aY $°a • �� . S THIS INDENTURE, made the 28th d.t,} of January, I!9^I., between HUNTINGTON BEACH COW , a corporntion, party of the first part, and The CITE[ W'MMXYGTON BEACH, W muniol:ral '00p e.a+ � v tioan.of the County of Oran e, '.Sta•te of California., party of the + astond 'part, WITNESSETH: That sa^Ld party of the first part, for and in cohsidergt, ,on of the sutra of Ten Dollars .(410.00), totethe'r with 'ot'liar good. and valuable aonsiderati0ns, not herein $�cpx�essed, ;the receipt of. all , y� r, '� of which in hereby acknowledged, has remised, released and forever (iuitclalmet1, and by the�:F presents canes remise, release and forever quitclaim unto the said party of the second part, and to its - . ts,.iecessors and as>ig%s, all those certain blocks, pieces or .• parcels, of land situato, lyiA&, acid, 1)'6ing in the .City of.',11untip4ton, )tench, County of Ora�o' State-Of balifornis, and bounde'.°`afad sax't:lculnrly described as follorS to--wits } All of D1ocks Four .iuzulred Five WO and Five Ilnadrod Five (505), a9 per map of Main. :street Section of the City, of i; d Iluntington reaob,.: as. :Peoorded irl Book 1 Pago '49, Vf'!§Oel.laneous x.tatps, Records of, said Orange County, State of California. 1 Together with all and singulAr the tenejf6nt�, YPreclitumentc tnoa appurtenances thereunto belonbir�6 or in anywise appertaininb, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents., title and 11[- js,;ues and profits thereof, and also all the ri6ht, t z 1� torest, property, possession, claim and cieirand. whatsoever, us well in law as in equity, of the said party of the first part, of in or to the sad premises and every part and parcel thereof, with the �•f t appurtenances. t TO HAVE AND To HOLD, all 'and siiv,ular, the f.ai(! prEr.iseo, y to,,;ether with the appurtenances, unto the stint party of the second { Dart, and its successors and assigns forever. " IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first cart has � caused these presents to be signed and sealed with its corporate ..—...ate---�._-�.......�..-.•-...... � _ WR ' ti?RV9,gKd'•S`�''°F`?21:n3A^Rs'T'*n•.,.rr wr�..�v.. ..+mA..- ..., r.... ... - , seal, ijy its President aatcl seetetary theretrnto duly $utltor- r izecl, on the day and year first al, written. HUNTINGT{JN 1I -,3t) "PANY . By t c e � ,b y � ec',retary. ILI ,$tote at Califuatao . ss. COUNTY OF.---yps---AU94-108,,-------- A. D., 19.2�,before me, @ this st.................day of. 11 ........JAacltt�TY� i Public in and for the said ate.-•s. �l a,..........._--•- a Notary personally ap County and State, residing therein, dulycommissioned an sworn,known to me to be the 1 geared..........P.-.Z --•-G1"AB-r•------_----- ........ ---••-----.....President and....�.Ij8L1---achgiaCk--...-•-known to me to be the N. ---- f18�t----. --..Secretary of the HUNTING TON BEACH COMPANY. Corporation therein the Corporation that executed the within Instrument,known to me to bete per- lfexecuted the same, sons who executed the within Instrument, on behalf of the Corp official seal named,and acknowledged to me that suchI have hereunto e Corporation hand and affixed my in witness �heceat 7'ete bove • ten. 1 the day and year in this --- - . r»wk m aed ear --,,-.d SWII , y� l y. j - �x� } u r 4s yra, Jk.;i� 4� °t•.� �- .e RF r�+'1 V i �' j{ rw r 3 � '7 'y }} fYr rr wr dq na r vt;f �t a itf n #t '!!"t •5 ,r q �y y I.tr�'+t r.r nri : M `x � F n r t r tF } el nx 1 ee,�c "� ► � �.,". '� it 4 r IL+n at fie a fS�r z .� r!` r F,< ij,`n*N1'74.y j .1 v s }t` nMOWN1 AU 0' i i tT� twi4'p. t I�I � fiL. ", ,a• 't '� � ��} S j' �"F it, - Y�A, ;let + . �.W 0 .. 'v�y'. y s: 1 t>'•}{ at yFl a4M1 Vty f ' y,,u I1 ,..,� t d h°' ky�t C 0 Ir :°l+ t s r) �N a✓r, 1 rr'M 3 11A s'tf ., j�t`� t +� t ./ } r E ..sr � i�@ - x # �ro, f:;. A" i S '� d' '� } �. eC fit X• tTT, ,���y r y� ' _.. i � i �. t ' ' f},w4 :.ee4 ,�.a��,fy�} �• { as "#Lr� t 6 vP rt`r;d.. ��:., t �`"iF `{ Y r.. i ° t ,; 5� .f ..:nbk r•. .�} s �1� t 1 F+n its 1 -s.f �I e :r fr a y, uq,,yy tap Imh�i'�51 q {^j �[[i 3 ;, It t c�F} rf= S� r�'i-.9x� +.r Irys.i k t fi f•�v �k 1: t4� Y-.hy, r :i(' tx ��,y't��r Y>� s 7 ! �q 7 f� osiilw k tt y §01.r r } { .i-h1 4?1 r11 7 ><' u r } + } i✓: S1k °l ' 'j' °// / t p 'M t t t + r�, (6+ �y+ ,•( �,�i}J�h { f ,, 5 �kr Q iarl wl r w�r4k IA "t + &t } S"f �uxilq')# y t rr hQY L d a ta' art a i r � r U,r �i ^ i 1 ion, 1 1 t 1 -0t"� rV "Yo it t + t I{�h ,:4 Yt art �: 1< r °# n-„ ";d>t ' t t t r 4 k r# v �a AW °t ti ,,F,Yµ$ d `,�1'Y r any •yi+ W. s owl 0, � �t "My ! I r 11 Am 1 Ly, t t :r+ f c� t r t • h , 1 i;t t d r.. r t ,+i j1 �.,va Y J ./.; y� a t `� I a rl 1 ""JoV, t nk!01 Tic All, { ins a 3 "XI d§ a �,� x ! a � !g r/�V ra tl t)00 d?"4 N.,�}Sar '. d I. Zvi y��' F' 0,1t y f a+�' r °.� C ' �r� +w i r r•,� k t. 1 t4�l,,ttsld rd.y 1y pklA ,+}. i�gn�(': ,. ! � t. !; 1'+" df�"�' pp� t yr� {A�,, �"•` �r r� n} ' � ) q:t �,5A� r '(!"p t �s, 1 L...s Jf triri �irfif, s,� r ' r�° fyy +fir Ott :illik' F +f + �s ` t Ct g3tLMMi u15'rt*� t yl 1�tt flt` tJr "tx jrti'rF . CITY OF HUN,TRNGTOVEM BEACM INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - To Charles Davis. From Stephen V. Kohler Real Property Agent Senior Community Develop- ment Specialist Subject OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE Date September 19 , 1978 TITLE SEARCH On September 18, 1978, the Huntington Beach City Council approved the use of the Old Civic Center site as a location for senior housing/activity center complex. In order to expedite the progress of this project, would you please conduct a title search of the Old Civic Center property, focusing particularly on any deed restrictions which might limit potential uses for this property. Any charges incurred in this research may be billed to CD account #894 . 771. Thank you. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me. SVK:PT:df . a� -OF : HUNT CITY INGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION - 'i;i""rt HUNTINGTON,BEACH; :To James W. Palin From Stephe'� ler i-V 5T t - .• �. Acting _Planning Director` - Sr. Co4� D.ev. Specialist ;y Date COUNCIL ONi AGING Z:ONGRESSIONAL September 18 , 1978. `.CONTRACTS IN HOUSING, TIATTERS tk . :j •In response .to your request., of .September 15 , 1978 , I would like to make;:the :,following: comments k3; 1. .,-'As you know, the Council on Aging has taken an active interest in the proposed senior housing on *the Old Civic Center Site. Representatives of COA contacted Congressman Jerry M. Patterson ,' t ; and State Assemblyman- Dennis Mangers to solicit their support for the project. Congressman Patterson' s staff suggested that 4 , x Congressman Hanaf.ord also be contacted. Both Congressman g g e " :.Patterson and Congressman Hanaford are .members;`"of " the - `}=' House Committee on Ban Finance and Urban Affairs. This Committee is instrumental in formulatin HUD appropriations . _;f' 2 . While Congressman- Robert E. Badham represents a large share of Huntington Beach, he: is not a member of the Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs Committee. ' t Please let;"me 'know if I may..-be of any more assistance. in this matter. _ SVK:gc '.ttitik - l 19 y •_ ... s:;-. —•f n-e erection of new ■ e council members in April, epior. hous howeverew monke e nplan wrrenchr,inh theared-tape machinery and RFP dis- . ■ tribution was halted be- For& cause the "uncertnty °; e n boygis o of the new counc l's atti- tude toward this project," �{ns� "0<-a�-" according to Kohler. Senior citizens who There also is the for the projecL To alleviate this situa- have cast covetous eyes problem of obtaining RFP as defined by Pat tion, Kohler said, the on proposed one and two- subsidy funds from the Tessier of the. city plan- redevelopment commis- bedroom apartments for U.S. Department of ning department is "an sion has requested to the old downtown civic Housing and Urban outline of the project i':,,:'.;',� meet with the council in center site may be too old Development (HUD) for from the city to the ! i joint session but no time and tired to move before prospective renters who developer who in turn has yet been set. the building is completed. may not be able to pay submits proposals in re- During the waiting At the present time the the $220-$240 per month sponse to that request...it period, another log jam project_ has been bogged rental fee on fixed in. may include preliminary was encountered. The down, first by,a chang�'ng comes. sketch plans and an esti- t county s allocation of "of city council member= mate of costs. In the case �.Section 8 existing rent r ship, and then by a fail- And the RFP (request of the senior citizen !'subsidy was reduced by lure of the city council to for proposals) have not project we tell developers HUD to about 40 units meet with the redevelop- yet been submitted to the we want 200 apartment, for fiscal year 1978-79. : ,went commission. 34 developers_ considered we want a club house, And a goodly share of the how are you going to to it i contemplated apartments and how much is it going will require rent subsi- to cost. The developer : dies. then submits a proposal. The city hopes, how- submits to lobby with the "We're a long way from bidding,"he added. central office of HUD in The original RFP was Washington, D. C. for a approved for distribution ` special allocation of to developers at a joint subsidy funds from session of the city council_ ' HUD's "discretionary and redevelopment com- fund." No commitment mission on Feb. 12 this has been achieved as yet. year. Changes were sug- gested and incorporated and the RFP was ready ' for distribution again in April. "The RFP," according to Stephen V. Kohler.&.; community development specialist,"calls for-the construction of about 200 one ' and twiAedroom ' apartments,^a.new senior i citizens'recreation center f and improvements to the existing branch library. HUD funds in the amount of $405,000.have been allocated to this Project." RE.QUEST FOR CITY COUNk-,iL ACTION Submitted by James W. Palin Department Planning Date Prepared September 11 , 19 788 Backup Material Attached Yes Gl No ubject COUNCIL ENDORSEMENT OF SENIOR HOUSING ON OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE City Administrator's Comments Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The implementation of the subject project has been halted pending endorsement by the newly-elected City Council and pending the commitment of Section 8 Leased. Housing Assistance Program subsidy .funds for 100 apartment units . . RECOMMENDATION: Endorse the use of the Old Civic Center Site for Senior Citizen Apartments and new Senior Citizens ' Center, and direct staff to begin implementation and formally request the assistance cf Congressman Jerry Patterson and Congressman Mark Hanaford in garnering an allocation of subsidy funds for 100 of the apartment units. ANALYSIS : The attached "Request for Proposal" (RFP) for the subject project details the recommended strategy for providing senior housing and a new, full-service senior center, with options for improvements to the Branch Library and limited service commercial on the Old Civic Center site. In summary, the strategy calls for the use of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Block Grant funds al- ready received by the City to accomplish the following: 1 . Demolish the existing buildings and grade the site; 2 . Make necessary improvements to the water and sewer systems on the site; 3 . Relocate mature Palm trees to perimeter of site; 4 . Construct a new Senior Citizens ' Center. ao Page Two The site would then be leased at a nominal fee to a developer selected on a competitive basis by the City Council . In return for the City' s contribution of land lease and improve- ments , the developer would be required to build and manage approximately 200 one and two bedroom apartments and reserve 50 percent of them for participants in the Section 8 leased Housing Assistance Program. In addition, the developer would be required to rent the remaining units for no more than the Fair Market Rents (FMR) for the Section 8 Program as established by HUD. One criteria for selection of a developer will be the amount below the FMR' s for which the developer is willing to rent the unsubsidized units. This strategy benefits the City and its senior residents by pro-. viding an assured supply of housing at affordable rents , does not commit the City to long-term management responsibilites, permits the involvement of private sector financing without cost to the City, and bolsters the City ' s efforts for economic development in the downtown area. This project has. come to the attention of U .S . Congressmen Jerry Patterson and Mark Hanaford and their offices have expressed willingness to assist the City in garnering the needed subsidy funds for this project because of the nature of the City' s contribution to the project -and because .of the City' s past successful efforts to improve housing. Therefore, upon Council endorsement of this project, the assistance of the Congressmen should be formally requested. FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Housing and Community Development Block Grant Program. Senior Housing Site $250, 000 Senior Center Improvements $155 , 000 (must be reprogrammed to this project) $405 , 000 Library Improvements $100 , 000 (estimated) (the funds for this optional activity are not committed from any source) Respectfully submitted, James� �J W Palin Acting Planning Director JWP:SVK:gc Attachment OLD CIVIC CENTER REVISED HOUSING PROPOSAL BUDGET Cost Source A. SITE PREPARATION• 1. Demolition & Clearance of $ 60, 000 HCD Senior Housing Site Memorial IIall, Fire Sta- tion, Administration Building, and Community Clinic 2. Water_' and Sewer Improve- 20, 000 HCD Senior Housing Site ments 3. Grading and Landscape 20 , 000 HCD Senior Housing Site Alterations Total Site Improvements $100 , 000 HCD Senior Housing Site B . NEW SENIOR CENTER 1. Construction of New $150 , 000 HCD Senior Housing Site Facility 155, 000 HCD Reprogram from existing center Total Center. Costs 305, 000 i C. LIBRARY IMPROVEMENTS (Uncommitted Funds) 1. Building Alterations & $100 , 000 City Funds Landscape Improvements 2 . Or Contribution of .New (100 , 000) City Funds Library Total Library Costs $100, 000 City Funds Subtotal (405 , 000) HCD Funds Subtotal (100 , 000) City Funds GRAND TOTAL $505 , 000 7 27 y "' civic 2, ' 1 PECAN j STREET i 1 240' s� �F FA H LJ LL L LL i a � ~ . N L center Ln 1 LL 75' 240' 80' \ 75' i OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE huntington beach planning department note: all palms are 30"diarn. 30'to 35' in height �5 1-22 ti © s s 24.5 0 . 00 W r N W ' 51, 50, N . ne 19 u0- 75� �. 5ti 8' block wall ® 75.6' ® IB- 66.3 46• FIRE STATION p..� 52' r 1u 46# 37' `n �1 story frame . c2 story concrete 56 5' 75.6' 2 29'1' W W PECAN AVENUE a. c. parking area J LL OLD CIVIC CENTER, SITE : NORTH PECAN AVENUE a. c. parking area ' ® 25 34 12 12 85 MEMORIAL HALL " 2 story masonary/stucco io 4 24 ` 85 12 1 51 lC: W �( 31— t�ernporar / _ 25 w �3t .. tfailef5 t— v; grass area tLL — u.. 50 CLINIC 14 v� 24 story/temp. N � i 74 25 1 v� I 27 28 27 i i ORANGE AVENUE J Y CAL D CIVIC CENTER SITE : SOUTH 10 uj L_tA _t_ uj 7777 .. , CL lk `l�•.\•. 1C 01 �. �W�•. "'[Iil� 'y.771 IF +�.1 i��!'�,I I�pV �j••9 � � I r� iT .I. �1 . �•I_•L71 • �$ yL:' � �'yLLJ I.� I�i.....i,iJ �I� ._I.....I'�_::._.::i.:;l l_::�1.'.N' .i��::iJ"'s�.:. .J I (il -`� i r ml iNl 1� I i .� �� �� L .� Lu 5 r�HiN31 713 P.i�'i• Z JL� L LI [TT,-.,.-TrmLED- �► r ;I o y�trw" 1�.111J lS -N33ltlnnll P I — IT. ��I Y. •err, 1111'''�-"'^icy � ..•+,�5;.'*` 1 itLl 1 LL i r .-.tO'-N s IlilI 1. '11 •I",- ' I _(`' II -rl r. —� . �� _j I__ -- I' 1�11U 1S Hl li --I', J u. 1LN331N3A 35 71 [1 _J it z [ �:I l:l'I;T j r r J I,'r �^` � - 1mA.:i� ���ii••�ec� - �•.�A'i: °^�•y�J��li.4 Q`�.�A.Lr�" Y V Q.� I(�I- I .'.��,_jI ('1 m I +T,�•r. ..�.�T i•r"• 7���� —I P ECG UJ l.� J 1 l 'lll� tL� [,�.�..1. .� II I� r' z [Tul C, _J Ifi ►— �: VJ L I LL i I I I I l I X =iUd.a•_:J.:y'..N.L'S'h!7JISdR:Fa:u,f �EF E!iTf[' a ['T1T :," .�� _� .— CD t u.Faa MID M'a r-tip:rium ft, is�W ¢i:;�DZ,=l. i i r' —i ia l }-'i . rll I I ,I - �,j f fd C �._..� I,.L.i..�I-LJ i 1, 31A'd30lOJ Y£LI 1 7M N3a109 - •`•?�' _,-..r y..�,r.l. - zi- Rr -.t P'�r r+--^ Li+.dr..' Y,"�aL�fL•"S. 4' �•"� Lam.-"1u �vcs�rls.w.�.'s�..{rC'.. -:��:t`'L'�'- - - �er�q wewuu nwnn w nauuaaavea�awaa.a+aau.ao ...+.� v.a�L (a'V �= TwF NTY SI�E��C Ord f � 2 2 W 31 ZC 'I .�II T !! a r f' .,. ;,; I L:I TWENTY-FIRST V�ST.J.. 3, T 'lt / 9� - 7 ;H. m f ;I r� TWCNT;l iH STREET ��,JI4 , . :� f.9_1� tar T4 rT NINI^EENTN r STREET z r— .I I.� ."s'��ee��w�"�' y�!y.l'w �,}�'!ii"'�,�Id4�-. II � dY',d'^r✓ r '��+��� � I EI � �- GN'C1NTH ST RIE1 Iq� p� 0 1 SIXTEENTH �LSllTFArll1.11 rV�iI U�n i �[ 1 " TIT >. : x Ca Uri �. IItcc___S,+ F�E TE(hTM r ST REE A ;I ��__. ..h ,�_::I II.e�n.l,I �„�''1,`?7�v" ° -t�•�r� hI�11ISw.a.l�IWO ;"ES IN zn II 1 �I 777 �41 1 � rMIR rEE IT 1 ST, i.: J. .• FT ��I;Ii.�'1 lli� I"I�rt' 1'Y7 1T k' TW ELFTII �`5'. - y ICI-eti1 .d I IJ.T,el+'r' rsTlrr•-r- 1 J,. ut CLEVENTN - -" 7171, TH •I - 77 9Lr°73_ m"Lf e�Re..P,">,,�n'6P�� r,�,7 I .IT i [,I-....r rr' „^--' I.- '� I F y � � I 7 d � T T �� 'I�. I_ Era, ILL. �I I � '%il`Il II.I Li:�11�=� •l�:'!.,'L.� yr > � . r rrl QF'� CITY: OF FiUNTINGTON BEACH . JJJ7t INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION r5• HUNTINLTON BEACH - k; ::'•To Floyd G. Belsito From Stephen V. E e ' City Administrator Community Developme t Specialist ffx ����++,� .! r' fit- .. • , SUb�ect SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING" AT Date August 31, 1978 ;.CIVIC- CENTER'.SITE - dhW,,•.In response to your request of this date, I would like to. provide you with the following .information ;.regarding the subject project. . The Request for .Proposal (RFP) for this project was approved for r °sr , ,•. distribution at a joint session- of -the City Council and Redevelopment Commission on February 21, - 1978. Certain changes to the RFP were suggested at this meeting, these were incorporated and the RFP was ready for distribution in April_ , 1978 . 'There are 'currently 34 , developers in .the distribution list. •r;.t,: . The RFP calls for the` construction ''of approximately 200 , one and two •• ,.�{�;�..e,- ,..•. •-. - ;,• :,t2.. bedroom' apartments, ". a-new Senior Citizens Recreation -Center, and im- provements to the existing Branch Library. $405, 000 of HCD funds have been allocated to this" project. ' 3. .. Upon the election _ of new Council members in April 1978 , distribution. of the RFP was halted. No RFP' s. have been made available to developers as of this date. Distribution was- halted because of the uncertainty of the new Council' s attitude toward this project. To alleviate this uncertainty., the Redevelopment Commission has requested to meet with the Council in joint session, but as yet such a session has not occurred. We, therefore, do not have the endorsement of either the =. . ,new Council or the Redevelopment" Commission for this project. 4.. While awaiting a determination on the attitude of the Council and t;. Commission on this project, the County' s allocation of Section 8 existing rent subsidy was severely reduced by the U. S. Depart- . ment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) , While rents in the new apartments to be built on .'the Old Civic Center Site would be . tied to . the Fair Market Rents (FMR'S) established by HUD for Orange County, these rents - ($220-$240/mo) would probably still be too high for most fixed-income senior households. Therefore, the RFP requires = that a share of -the 200 units (approx. 20-50 percent) be reserved `' - for seniors participating in the Section 8 rent subsidy program. However, since the Orange County Housing Authority' s allocation of subsidy funds for seniors .has been reduced to just 40 units for FY 1978-79, no subsidy funds are available for the project at this time. Staff is working with the Council on aging and other interested senior organizations to lobby with the central office of HUD . in Washington, D.C . for a special allocation of subsidy funds for this project from the HUD `' ` ' Secretary' s "Discretionary Fund. " Federal elected officials have been .fin:. • C� Page Two . ' contacted. regarding a Discretionary Fund allocation and the va ry F initial response has been• favorable. However, no commitment - a from. HUD has yet been achieved. CONCLUSION .14 i- efore the Senior Housing, Senior Citizen Recreation Center, and Library improvements: can be undertaken, ,two things must happen. r.� a h.� ..- The City Council and Redevelopment Commission must meet and agree to endorse.- thee implementation` of the. project, and; ,i`; ,!'" :2 . - - Some tentative commitment for .subsidy funds must be received from the U. S. -- Department of Housing -and.- Urban Development. : ''Thank you for this opportunity to bring you up-to-date on this project. If I. may: be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate .to contact me. 1. � A VR LZC CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To STEVE KOHLER From WALTER W. JOHNSON HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LIBRARY DIRECTOR Subject MAIN STREET LIBRARY Date April 7, 1978 As requested, I have divided the requirements for the Main Street Library into two parts: "A" , Renovation of the Existing Building and "B" , Requirements for a New Building. A. Renovation of Existing Building 1. Paint interior and exterior 2 . Improve lighting throughout 3 . New overstuff furniture 4 Light control for the gallery wing 5. Carpeting throughout 6. Repair of tiling,`in uncarpeted areas 7 . Improve ventilation in restrooms 8 . Removal of asbestos ceiling 9 . Renovation of furnace and heating system 10. Altering room behind checkout desk to comfortable "living room" atmosphere 11. Dumbwaiter 12 . Renovation of staff lounge and hall area leading to it 13 . Public patio in back area 14 . Display space for Historical Society The building is structurally sound and architecturally pleasing. It is the general feeling that any attempts to replace it would be met with great resistance. B. New Building Needs 1. Space comparable to existing room (to house 50, 000 volumes) 2 . Adequate lighting from a variety of sources 3 . Study seating for 25 to 30 4 . Inviting outside entrance 5. Wall display space 6 . Parking adjacent to entranceway 7 . Adequate staff working,-:area 8 . Checkout area 9 . Comfortable "living room" area 10 . Small office space 11. Staff lounge 12 . Adequate space for Historical Society 13 . Work display area for cultural activities cc: Library Board Allied Arts Historical Society Team City of Huntington Beach _�_ / J�IL_S G� FIELD BK. N0. 06, ENGINEERING DEPT. S/Tc DATE '�" "78 TITLE C)GD C/V/G CEN i cC� _ PARTY 804�DN1.on/.PJ�/GL/�, - PDPT/Lr.'D BLpG� P�L/tiJ i' G OG�Ti ONS PAGE N0. OF mA- • can'c'+•- � t-- - - - 4 1� � t j/ ta`_ � �' r -- -- - ` U-�� -�` V O \ T y • _ 1f � + / i a - -_ w - - -� (50) (90) _. .. � N f j D U m 2 vi 4*75 (97 14ZL PAG✓t;' 3 0 144E xplpb,X 30 D/A/'G` - - --- - - i_ I- -` - - - f�£e/'�/SF /�'r -- - _. _ ...riw«.�s yr Y 0 W - POO r 77 Duo o _ i S 1 Oro __-_-_ '\ - - - - -- - - -• _- - �• �4 City of Huntington Beach _ FIELD 8K. NO.- ENGINEERING DEPT. - DATE 4' "�� TITLE PARTY�7� /��/V,pf�/l�J -P'PT/GI.O lT�c PA A- Z --- = ----� - = =--- - -•�-� -_ - '�� - ----- •-__�_.BLDGi D�GM�T2cc_LOG.cTIO,'�.CS GE NO. OF - S/�GT go N Fw3 �. t•P ,b .-►. Lv H .1• _ `� L/N� �e - a^ A ' -------------- - MYP'JCUM ✓ � 1r �� �� � ;� L � V 'L+12.8 Z• r �: ' �' - 5 /I _ _BAY !v/n.DOW _5•. . a .. .- ;. oaf-� a , v _ _� A CD —27 5 =P �'� �'� • 4 ��� -tick' ��� -• � � �;, - - _ Q � N31�--z(;`E_ ___ F/.5-' - _ •1.7 L .�� I z - - ._ _ _ �� .`'9 ___ � .. .. -_ `z a s ✓��V vV --- - O _ OT�S• /J .4GG P.4444 rR-675S �.. 328.- �__ 30 cZ.¢ v3 - i � 9 li ' _._FwH path -�,ro` -•- �J .S ox _s VL o /7• — CONC-M � _.c. ,_ _ �y2�`•a �_ _ _------ - - ----- __ Z� TNEI�.E.4P� 7-�Z"D/.CivM =. __ IAI _. _ Off/ - n , Jr, h , .v.,fit .ems - � F/FTC••/ _� �' :_.ST. °—� --- - ���,�`� _ __-- --- ., --- — - - -- �_ _ i CITY OF HUNTINGTON. BEACH REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING This is a request for proposals for conceptual architectural drawings and financial feasibility statements for the construction and operation of a senior citizens housing development, full-service senior citizens . center, an exterior improvement and re-landscaping of the existing or pro- vision of new branch library, and limited service commercial on the Old Civic Center Site in downtown Huntington Beach. The details of each of these elements .of the proposal, are described below, along with a budget for site improvements. The goal of this proposal is to combine the City' s Housing and Community Development, General Fund, and Section 8 Housing Assistance resources with those of private enterprise to provide a comprehensive housing, recreation, social and cultural center for senior citizens . To accomplish this Dual the City of Huntington Beach will: 1. Demolish existing buildings on site $60, 000 (except library) 2. Fully improve the site for construction $40, 000 3 . Provide funds for: a. Construction of senior citizens center $305, 000 b. Construction of new library or improvements to existing facility $100, 000 $405 , 000 4 . Lease site to selected developer: a.. Lease terms $1. 00 per year b. Estimated value of site: $906 , 000 In .return, the selected developer will be obligated to :do the following: 1. Design, finance, and construct approximately 200-.300 one and two bedroom senior citizen apartments on the site. 2 . Maintain and manage these units . 3 . Reserve a percentage of these units (20-50 percent depending on the total number of units built) for certificate holders in the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program. 4. Design and construct with .:`HCD 'funds , a Senior Center to be turned over to the City upon completion. 1 . `J 5. Design and construct with City funds improvements to the existing library which shall continue to be managed and maintained by the City ; or: The developer' s option, a new, comparable library facility may be provided but in no case will the City' s contribution exceed $100 , 000 , and the developer will be responsible for the cost of demolition of the existing library . This option -is offered to provide the developer with the opportunity to more fully integrate . library facilities in the development and offer greater flexibility on site design. 6 . (Option) Design, finance, construct , and manage small scale service commercial area on the site. 2 THE SITE LOCATION: Between Sixth and Main Streets and Acacia and Orange Streets in downtown Huntington Beach (see map attached) . USE: The site, formerly used as the City' s Civic Center, con- tains five municipal buildings and a number of temporary structures . The site includes a portion of the Pecan Street right-of-way, which is presently used for on- site parking. SIZE: Approximately 3.-644 gross acres ZONING: CF-C (Community Facilities - Civic Center Uses) This zoning will revert to R3 & C3 upon discontinuance of civic center use. GENERAL PLAN: Planning Reserve (excluding Pecan St. , right-.of-way) . UTILITIES: All major utilities are available to the site. SERVICES: The Senior Citizens Recreation Center provides recreational and social services for approximately 4000 seniors a month, and is currently located 2/3 miles from the project site , and will be relocated to the old civic center as part of this proposal. The beach and municipal pier are located approximately four blocks from the site . Bus service by Orange County Transit District is available at the site . The City Gym with pool and exercise equipment is nine blocks from the site. Major medical facilities -are 2 miles from the site. . Some shopping facilities and major banking institutions are available in the downtown area, however, major shopping would require travel of approximately one mile. 3 THE PROJECT No building configuration is specified,. however, the following design considerations must be followed: A. Senior Citizen Housing Project: The proposal calls for the construction of approximately 200-300 apartments for senior citizens in one or more buildings. Most of these units should be one bedroom but some two-bedroom units shall be provided for disabled and handicapped with live-in attendants-. The facility shall also include a full range of communal .facilities . (except eating) and shall be designed to provide for handicapped accessibility to all facilities. The project should be oriented to "maximize natural light and ventilation in each unit and to maximize view potential. Movement to, from and within the project should be convenient. Each unit. should have a private outdoor space. Indoor and outdoor common areas should be provided. Provision of common use amenities such as security systems , medical alarms, exercise facilities , gardening or outdoor recreation facilities will enhance a proposal. Project proposal should make use of the numerous specimen size palms which presently exist on the site. Funding : The construction and long-term financing of these units would be the responsibility of the developer. In return for the lease of the property at a -minimal cost the developer would agree to reserve a share of these units (approximately 20-50 percent) for certificate holders in the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program. The Housing Authority would have responsibility for ad- ministering the subsidy payments. A provision of the lease agree- ment would require that Section 8 units rent for no more than the federally established Fair Market Rents for the Leased-Housing _Assistance Program (1 bedroom _$220/mo-, ; 2- bedroom $24-0%mo-..)- & developers are encouraged to submit rents- below this lbvel. B. Senior Citizens Recreation Center Project: To provide a full service senior citizens center (of approximately 10, 000 sq. ft. ) to house the activities of the current center at 17th and Orange plus the Transportation-Lunch- Counseling Program. Senior Citizen Center would include meeting rooms , offices , a kitchen, and outdoor and indoor recreation facilities . Funding: To construct this center, HCD Funds programmed for im- provements to the existing center should be reprogrammed to this site and a portion of the funds programmed for site acquisition for senior housing will also be reallocated (see attached Budget). . 4 C. Library Improvements Project: Provide an. exterior "face lift" and relandscaping of the existing library directed towards creating a uniform archi- tectural treatment for the entire project, or, at the developer' s option, provide a new comparable facility. The City' s contri- bution to -this phase- of development shall not exceed $100, 000 and if a new facility is proposed, the developer would be responsi- ble for the demolition of the existing library structure. Funding: City funds would be required for this project (see Budget) . D. Commercial Space Project: At the- option of the developer, limited commercial lease space may also be integrated into the proposal design. The con- struction of this optional facility would be the responsibility of the developer and the developer or management agent will have responsibility for the leasing and management of the commercial space. Funding: The developer would be responsible for the financing of this project and revenues from it may be used to underwrite the costs, of the Senior Housing Project. F. Option: The City will also receive proposals for the use of only a portion of the site and these proposals may contain any or all of the components described above. The submission of a proposal for use of only a share of the site is at the option of the developer and developers are encouraged to submit more than one proposal. 5 PROPOSAL CONTENTS All proposals should be ' "design/build" proposals; that is each proposal should represent a physically sound and economically_ feasible project. Each proposal should contain at minimum: 1. Preliminary Design a. illustrative plot plan (showing building location, recreational. facilities, landscaping, walkways , parking) b. elevations (rendering optional) C. floor plan of typical housing units , senior center and com- mercial space, if .any. 2 . Preliminary. Financial Statement a. A "Pro Forma", financial statement must accompany each proposal. This shall include building and other improvement costs, projected revenues; and must document the necessity of the City' s financial contribution for the production and rental of the housing units. b. A maintenance and management plan for each element of the proposal and the attendant costs must be included. C. A statement of the credentials of the developer including, previous experience with similar projects and a financial status statement must also be included. 6 OLD .CIVIC CENTER REVISED MOUSING PROPOSAL BUDGET Cost Source A. SITE PREPARATION 1. Demolition & Clearance of $ 60, 000 HCD . Senior Housing Site Memorial Hall, Fire Sta- tion, Administration Building, and Community Clinic 2. Water and Sewer Improve- 20, 000 HCD Senior Housing Site meats 3. Grading and Landscape 20, 000 HCD Senior Housing Site Alterations Total Site Improvements $100 ,006 HCD Senior Housing Site B. NEW SENIOR CENTER 1. Construction of New $150 ,000 HCD Senior Housing Site Facility 155, 000 HCD Reprogram from existing center Total Center Costs $305, 000. • C. LIBRARY IMPROVEMENTS (Uncommitted Funds) 1. Building Alterations & $100, 000 City Funds Landscape Improvements 2 . Or Contribution of 'New (.100, 000) City Funds Library Total Library Costs $100, 000 City Funds Subtotal (405, 000) HCD Funds Subtotal (100 ,000) City Funds GRAND TOTAL $505, 000 7 . 27 Lo civic1\00ole ti 246' �`\\ PECAN . i STREET i 240' s� LU W U W to M center M X -LL 75' 240 80' 75' . OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE 9 huntington beach planning. department 8 note: all palms are 30"diam. 30'to 35' in height 15 2200 � y I ® 2a. 0, W 57' 5(1 1 - Vf 19 75� 22- 8' block wall ® ® 75.6 - 3a 66.3 16 �l1! T - 46• FIRE STATION 2 N � F 52' w ' n 460 3f' 1 story frame �? story concrete ss 5' 2s' 21' i ►- ui W PECAN AVENUE*'—�a• c• parking are H a_ U. OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE NORTH 9 PECAN AVENUE a. c. parking area ® 25 ® 34 �VVJJJ 12 12 85 MEMORIAL HALL .. 2 story masonary/stucco 0 4 za� - es 1z 1 s, ISt W 1 31 temporar �-2s Z w 31�' trailers Q 2 ti X _ vs grass area U. u. 50 CLINIC 24 14 n 1 story/temp. N 1 74 25 27 26 27 ORANGE AVENUE 61 Off.® CIVIC CENTER SITE : SOUTH 10 '��,. r+, Y+ r.;)» Yn' 14 Y^ .c."rG.:'}'r r`• � • •� � NNE .i', .:x�. •IJ ,;'uleai```„y;.rS ..e .,54F .x:y:<. -,pr.:.struL, +:d^ ..NYYJIS +"}i � t • , rp tlp w..,�. ::c��• or:•,vr x?�fvc>r.:„rr...W..;aw.a:w NURkautvaf.r,•,..a>,as�r;stiff •�.�car�wr;•M+..:+.<. ` +•'.?v'+. n>.r +r' s.•+;rnYn 5. m..sNwvrr;,: �'NN CNN IIN NIN r N is �tir`ur,w,+-__r.�•ag• .c.�?,w?j` F R®Ri'INp111111iN1Is1 Ntl e: �•. p S INN N NNNNI ,5 Nn N� I�N�I� � .t��r�:..,y..a:.•ve:a•,::;...i,a.,.na:vR-•>•j$�^•:'�.. ,•u..,,�•vr.r:;act;arrr.rm;r.;7xi a� AI�I k 4`g•r.^,.: r..cr:..� �:x,ara�•:: ret�. :+:err.�y-_.+�,c;)�I tve��# i.`.afd�i.'�"3 ? pRAA l t r•e;xvr,u...aah ,N,rr.u,' eu+ G.i,.:*:,'.wH:�y,.r�RN rSKrvraer.�:h �`:n„v , l.tr�•1'�✓c:t.,c a-:e�wys..\rrt:t�'.xs h1�r�Y,�•e�.a:/a f�Aii+ �f+.t!4:�.-..t. !f,:!a'nb•i.r:5; �9<.r'#4 NNpBa HI ••O•• esY•l1M'••�•••••�pR•�'�, �i rue e e e„I�eel�al ".[�.f'?•• iK.YF-f:1� I V' �e �14iFJrL� '41f}.':#t."�'•.• 'i't•I+::sCYF.SFW MINA I � ee �e mire eeew �nnl 5�N NI Illi� �' a _•o ���,;:•e+�:�m : ,�...f:m,c.ti ..%c!...;s..,,.kx�.,r,:.4 a:>v!wmcx•:a�a>.K•w�n'rre mom , g ,�•• wi. .%f ,`a«.. --< _�k;w eKMe✓i1H-:?R^.n`IA•••�••��1W5} {A ''N e ��•• ,�M•�p• 1G iij� 1,,,•••• G4 :.l'r:.. 1.::aN k"�ir 1�x N�N .. ., i• IH•• � �+aX� r •.,I�.. �<Alefli ?�11 8 wee a � �' t NN NN IA WIN 4 � tleN� Il�ennN ; J,K y�N �eelellAl:,�Lr .�" i i r fit..Aa � yM!» U tf4 • t�. e3Ri4 pr.\ •a . AMJ / M1 T.u. 1}l •� '1 k'I�� NMNUNt�'��lu qN:.v� •'NN�� �NII�II��,� t' 1 Ip M NII NY IIN�, 'L mgmm NPII�I�I; • ��1�� �IIq�NM• bA ')b �•Agpl �g11H4�� �' • 3. r�. ' I NNNp PINY Y � A 11� 'ti�� �II�fIN�Y�tlp� � NNNN� �: (lam alb • �• ''`;�I� ��AIA1 ANC �!'�I��A� � ��u N , .IIP NMI N Nnua�f {�Nt1 N� U111 0s NIiNlummNN NNII�� It�MpN ~ NtINA�' ' I IBM ��.�� non ����1 . • r n. r�w Fr<nH�l���� ���� ► f1 INu >lu aNNW AIINHNII� � WACIAy 1100"NN II 0 Run h n . _�. r fr',b s K � •rt.. +H x4� K �='rh�rrekrii x17 ,.-.. yIMN Run IN glluuullu r1l1l� 09 �d� gal �� i� �NrNIN ululN.. N�r•7N� _ __` I t �NNuimN�N�ut UAW' 11111�"illrll� A r �. '�rlPpNd 1��1/.�9®•►!'ir!'hui::.�:SF..y.•'� — nr;cY:a-.n��_ :�-.Y�4 OR t- 4 ;. ��}�..-.ae•-,�.•..._ .stSarr�e.ba.s;.:p•�!__ -I..I w'tca w..'.�S Ya1pAtl1 ,�' G V'=tw'. � •kttr_�i7,til1rQLti'� ti^ b1."• � r.;��li sNu�tlu� I��IA�fa..11 DNA ullfJ�IIgN 4r�l�d) �iA�'� � 16u1�1 �I� �'►�r, ,<'°ram• s _ I Ip11� �gllllgll O�Ba"'�" � "��:�• � 1 4� III'I�II� W�H•�••A•� � .-� � I�r. r 5 ��9• A11N1 _ ,IF 1 w I �1Y•aP' HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPT. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH . MAY 171978 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION �j HUNTINGTON BEACH P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Ed Selich, Planning Director Mark Travis To Steven Kohler, HCD Coordinator From Deputy City Attorney Subject Waiver of Development Fees at Date April 17 , 1978 Old Civic Center Senior Citizen Housing Project You ask if development fees can be waived for the abov.e referenced project . The answer is notvtithout a revision of the current ordinance . Recent research has shown that the only municipalities which waive fees have provisions to do so within their fee structuring ordinance . Not only would the City be in violation of its own ordinance if it were to arbitrarily waive the development fees for any particular project, but also we would be liable for lawsuit from other developers for whom said fees were not also waived. Upon request this office would prepare an ordinance which would allow for the waiving of fees for particularly described developments , for example., senior citizen' s housing; low income housing, or a development which might include a percentage of either of those . MARK TRAVIS Deputy City Attorney MT:cs APPROVED: A4,__4 di,4- GAIL HUTTON City Attorney n I Y • HUNTINGTON BEACH A� ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPT. INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MAR 31 1978 HUNTINGTON BEACH P. 0. Box 190 To Ed Selich From H. E. Hartge Huntington Beach, CA 92641 Subject Sewerage for Old Civic Date March 31, 1978 Center Site As a follow-up to my memo of March 22, sewer flowmeters with chart recorders were set in the two sewers that could service the old Civic Center site. The meters recorded the flows for the period of March 22-29 . Analysis of the recorder charts shows that the sewer in the alley between Fifth Street and Main Street is operating close to capacity while the sewer in the alley between Fifth Street and Sixth Street still has much capacity remaining. Consequently, the proposed development should be required to connect to the latter sewer as a condition of development. H. E. Hartge Director of Public Works HEH:JRR: lw cc: Steve Kohler Mike Zambory J ,V :{y HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPT. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2 3 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION MAR 1978 HUNTINGTON BEACH P. O. BOX 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 To Ed Selich From H. E. Hartge Director of Planning Director of Public Works' Subject Sewerage for Old Civic Center Date .March 22, 197,8 Site ; 4 The attached map shows the existing sewer lines that could serve the old Civic Center site. Either line should service the proposed Senior housing development with no problems, however, in the interest of a. balanced system the line -between Fifth and Sixth Streets should be ;given first choice. Although the City lines should be adequate, the Keith and Associates' report ("Master Plan of Sewers for County Sanitation District No.11") indicates that the existing Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewer of CSD No ll is capacity deficient at this time. According to the Districts, their policy regarding this sewer is to allow only •connections from developments that conform to existing zoning. This deficient condition .will be relieved upon construction of the Coastal Trunk Sewer- of CSD No. 11 which is expected within the next two years. Steve Kohler should contact Dennis Reid of. the County Sanitation Districts at (714) 540-2910 for more information. H. E. Hartge Director of .Public Works HEH.^JRR:jj 1 1 ► I 4 1! P,.-7 INNING ZONING DM IZ S.ECTIONAI DISTRICT MAP II-6-II LEGEND: CITY OF ADOPTED MARCH 7, ' N v .ANN' L•n Tu rl 1l l�CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE' NO.754 'IMnI w UPI ttaNMnlu�vrtDFwFNr orRTR,;r AMENDED ORONO AMENOEO Rg o No. AkENDEO ORD NO Ig>-� SIx SL[EpwlLt R[SrDE xLE DISi RIct 3-28.60 )Sb 2-IB-TI IbJJ MN TWO FAMILY RESU_PIDENCE DISTRICT IUN7�INGTON BEACH -61 B4) S--]-11 1645 3' LIMITED MBUS-N E C-IT PESIDENCE DISTRICT II-fi-61 B]6 MULTIVLE FAMILY RES-DENCE DISTR-CT 5-)-62 900 I )I 'fi B2 q-I-62 929 GENCRAI-Pu5'NE SS O'SLRICT 12-]-fit 9m 2-201J IB'1 Dy 11-.LIGHTINDIISTNIAL DISTRILI 8-5-6J 992 A-J-)0 192] U4 COMMUNITY FACILITIES IRECREATIONALIDISTRICT B-Ia-6] 99b 8-514 19J0 -85 IIII fi-]-T] 19BB �'COMMUNITY FACILITIE3(CIVIC)DISTRICT 0 R A N G I;. COUNTY CALIFORNIA :IT_fib 11BD .5-15 30O OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTINCT 1 2 21-66 I186 9 15 t] 20 LJ (('L! Ne-BORHOOD COMMERCIAL.D197RICT ,_66 125E 3-19-TB 2034 COMMUNTY BUSINES5 DISTRICT AMENDED BY ZONE CASE J-b.bT I]o4 T-B_m 2O90 9-I->E t111 't47 NIG./WAv GDNMERCML O+STRrCi 101,174,175,201,237,266,291.282.342,347.484,536.545.66-23,66-41.66-66.67-5,76.23 s-1e 67 iae 1-J-n 2152 P2] DESIGNATES PRECIS[PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT 67-16.67-22,SO-39,69.14,69-13 69.55.PP70-2,70-10,PP70-4,71-3,71-10.71-29,72-33.72-43.73-26,74-7,75-3C,75-7,76-3,76-19 -a-e9T L463 cool—II-E.WITH OIL PRooucTlow - 1.21-69 1511 - I-\ 8-4-69 1515 --- SETBACK LINE J 4-zoao 15n '] 2 )-6-TO 1 R COMBINED WITH O PRODUCTION ga9-10 Ifi06 IN AREA BOUNDED BY MLM IO II AVE.ON E.SEVENTEENTH STD ADAMS AVE. ON NW,OCEAN AVE.ON SW,, I\ ' I I I ' 1 '1 ' ' 1 S SEVENTH ST ON SE. L` V U��N-�J IJ LEI (J LJ L�LIJ I I ICJ � I I I I a04��r9 ,P2 bl-0 RI-0 RI EFITEE"Es R-1 F R-I R-I R2 8 " ----`------ RS 3_0/ - p C4 RT C«o .Y[N R3-0 W 500 _ 5Bo ' C2� F•1 4"•3 •+• LOMA AVE N R5 -0 I9MrrN s. �°;.) -' b o R3-0 o PD9n.ApD cR __ _ R5-0 0 ,:� RI In e5o m ••ti RI RI .RI RI i RI R2 R3-0 �') )� aoaoa a SO. R!•0 8 -- CF-E THIRTEENTH �J 7 OSwEGO AVE. AVE. R2-PD-ID d R RI RI o R3-0 rc a .� R2-PD-lo.4-`''• K . 1D•.vrER R�•roc;_) - R RI RI a RI M N NASHVILLE AVE- '-1p yti gfsr RI RI Z rwELEt� sr R2 R3 R3 R2-PD•10 3 R5 C F-R ,,AIR Z-PO_::::: --:1ba R2-PO-ro ): � 2DD yA R I RI R I n'f.:-: 'rAR'F.) -- MEMPMIS AVE y oo aalloa ooNo �� ]DD B Ar CF-R ELEVENTH R 2 6T. °p eO a RI „H,R R2 RI R2 ¢ z ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ i RI I 0: _ LINCOLN AVE. R3 C4 - yt RI O RI R2 c RI ENrN i IY �o �a ao nn noRI R2 57]O N N N N N . R2 RI MNOxvILLE AVE. - RMTOWNLOT SPECrFIC - 1- PLAN AREA ONE f¢ IA JOLIET.- AVE. (SECTION'S') � O tir R3 R2 R2 R! R2 o N N N N N N R3 R3 R3 C INDIANAPOLI AVE,--' R3 TR3 I I R2 2 R2 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a R 2 N .P Bo �Cf 8,P HARTFORD '•' AVE. Q R°' II y R�� :J R22 - M N M R2 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ r i OE NEVA Qry Q 'T R N R3 3 A .� •� y FRANHFORT - = 2 c L _ '-G �• q � D R 3 P2 oaoo� I _T V M R 3 4 4 U U ELMIRA - E. Soy 1. RR 3 - Qp C P 4r h4 M IF5 N)' 1FI N M H - O I P •LL U K K r • '� � N GV V R' DETROIT < AVEF y Q R3, c `'2 Y CHICAGO - O AVE F .T R 3 U R2 _Wn eD� ..0 I e.. co � J Ot �oaz ( :R2-PD -, R 3 i •�,, � CC BA LT•MORf AVE E'pp+ I °per R2-PD C'/ c3 ° f �� o�y� <�,�- ° R 3 - N c °, �KRs R5 C R3 _ OC C `,b ti? ';.�..i .�-ATLANTA - 1 D - Dw AVE --n \9i u)-' �.9,I' ��`• �`FsaLE IN FEET / _ - EX/S_T/h=CSO_ N4 /t__- C/T-Y SEMERS- _ NOTE F� F�/ / - - AL L 70DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET -OCE N_A WF-UE - -__--__----v j--- _ i Y TONE ADJD'NING ANY RIGHT OF WAY - SUCH RI TO EXTEND TO THE Lf:N iER 01 TRUNK SEWER DF SUCH RIGHT OF WpY IL 1(�� 'PIyENT 0 D V U E or° 1�c DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMEN D LOS ANGELES AREA OFFICE MAR 21 i978 �y IIIIIIII o° 2500 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90057 >0,3"3O N�Oa March 15, 1978 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REGION IX ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 450 Golden Gate Avenue P.O. Box 36003 San Francisco, California 94102 IN REPLY REFER TO: 9.2CF Mr. Floyd G. Belsito City Administrator Attention: Mr. Stephen Kohler City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92638 Dear Mr. Belsito: Subject: Community Development Block Grant Program Program Number B-77-MC-06'-0506 Senior Citizen's Housing Site It is our understanding that the City proposes to offer a City- Owned site to developers at less than market value to induce developers to set aside a percentage of the units to accommodate Section 8 applicants (elderly) , and that Block Grant funds will be utilized to clear the site and provide certain site improvements. Based on our preliminary review of your Grantee Performance Report, it appears there is an unfulfilled need for "Family Units" (four or less persons) which equates to two bedroom units and "Large Family Units" of three or more bedrooms. The following indicates the goals for Section 8 "Existing Rental Units" and the units occupied as shown on Form HUD-4076 of the Grantee Performance Report, with corresponding percentages. Goal Occupied = Percentage Elderly 335 192 57 Family 679 .557 8 Large Family . .253 91 39 Il 1 J" 2 4 Based on the above, we strongly recommend that the City include some two and three bedroom units in the percentage of units to be provided as assisted units under the Section 8 program in the negotiations with prospective developers of the site. Sincerely, r Earl G. Fields Program Manager L-AMe CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Steve Kohler From Jim Hibbard Subject Old Civic Center Site Date March 13, 1978 Principals - Stephen Kohler H.E. Hartge E.A. Elevatorski Type of occupancy - Senior Citizen Type of units - residential, (1) one bedroom (c) Occupancy load - 1. 5 persons per unit (c) Project total area @ 163, 125i0, (see Water Facilities Map) Green area (15� of total) @ 24 , 469*(see -Water Facilities Map) Water pressure - static 50-55 psi Fire requirements - 2500-3500 gallons per minute Water usage total all catagories - 170 gallons per capita per day (b) Water demands this project Average for 200 units - 51, 000 gallons per day (b) Average for 300 units - 76 ,500 gallons per day Minimum for 200 units - 24 ,000 gallons per day (a) Minimum for 300 units - 36 ,000 gallons per day Maximum for 200 units - 101, 400 gallons per day (a) Maximum for 300 units - 152 ,100 gallons per day Water mains and source supply to this area can deliver the maximum demand required for this project. Revisions will be required for fire demands, ie install (2) two fire hydrants. (See revised Water Facility Map) . Jim Hibbard Engineer Coordinator JSH:lw a = Source - Water Supply Engineering Table 1-1 b = Source HBMWD Book 9 , yearly average C = Source - Planning Dept. T,r ... w.c c e ;nr,',' r fC /H{ e a.y r/�. o { Z o o f�. a " 00" �/���..��....�• �/.�/tea lJ xCIi HtINTh.N'GT+OhI.: BSEACH. -� s5 .}��=�` >�f} _ - .,.-r_of�';�•- .. �, t K9�d'�`, ' + �✓yd e'll �r' i� � i� - � � �� � � ■ i• +� CITY OF HUNTINGTON 13EACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH - - - - To Don P. Bonfa From Edward D. Selich City Attorney Planning Director Subject Senior Citizen Housing at Date March 6 , 1978 Old Civic Center Waiver of Fees On February 21 , 1978 the City Council approved for immediate distribution a Request for Proposal for the construction of Senior Citizen housing units on the Old Civic Center Site (see attached draft RFP) . Part of this proposal calls for the waiver of development fees for the developer selected to construct the units. This waiver' of fees is intended to re- duce the cost of the production of the housing units sufficiently to permit the units to be rented for amounts .below the market rate. What legal grounds exist. for this proposed waiver. of fees and will an ordinance amendment be required? Perhaps in .your analysis it would be helpful for you to know that the adopted Housing Element of the General Plan contains a policy statement regarding. . . "assistance to developers. . . " but does not specify the waiver of fees. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen V. - Kohler at Extension 5541. EDS: SVK:gc ®/ CITY OF HunTMGTon BEA(H DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 December 20, 1977 Mr. E. G. Aftergut, Director of Development Goldrich, Kest and Associates . 816 Union Bank Plaza 15233 Ventura Boulevard Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Subject: New Construction Housing for Senior Citizens and Families Dear Mr. 'Aftergut: Thank you for your letter of inquiry .regarding our plans for subsidized housing. I would like to take this opportunity to brief you on our current plans . 1. We have been approved by SCAG for 100 units of Section 8 New Construction for Large Families . If SCAG is successful in their application for supplemental Section 8 funds, we expect funds to be available early in 1978 . We have agreed with SCAG that these units will be advertised in a "Jurisdiction-wide Notice of Fund Availability . " This means that developers who control sites within Huntington Beach will be invited to submit proposals to SCAG on a competitive basis for all or a share of these units. We are also encouraging these units to be mixed with market rate units . 2 . We are also preparing a Request for Proposal for the construction of senior citizen housing on .the City' s old Civic Center site. In this project we plan to use HCD funds to improve .the site and lease ' it to a developer at a nominal cost. In return, we will ask the developer to reserve a share of the units for our certificate holders in the Section- 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program. The RFP will also offer the . ..choice: to submit plans for a senior citizens center, modifications to an existing library or provision of a new one, and an optional commercial component. The developer for this project will be selected by the City on a competitive basis and the RFP should be distributed early in 1978 . . I would be happy to discuss either or both of these projects with you. If you feel your firm would be interested in knowing more about these proposals , please phone me for an appointment at (714) 536-5541. Page 2 I look forward to hearing from you. Very truly yours , Stephen V. Kohler Senior Community Development Specialist SVK:ja • CITY OF HunTinGTon BEA ( H J� DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 TO: Redevelopment Commission FROM: Planning Department DATE: December 5, 1977 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS HOUSING ON THE OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE. On November 10, 1977, the Planning Department presented to the Redevelopment Commission, a draft Request for Proposal for the use of the old Civic Center site in downtown Huntington Beach. At that meeting, the Redevelopment Com- mission made several suggestions for amendment of that Request for Proposal. Attached for the Redevelopment Commission' s review is a new RFP incorporating the Commission' s previous suggestions. Specifically, the changes to the RFP include: 1. Family Housing has been eliminated from the proposal. 2. The number of senior citizen apartments has been changed to include a range of 200-300 units and the height of the building(s) is not stipulated. 3. The City' s and developer' s responsibilities have been clarified. 4. An optional element has been added to permit a developer to include a small scale service commercial operation in the proposal. 5. The contents of the proposals have been more clearly defined and shall now include a "Pro-forma" statement of the financial operation of the proposed project. RECOMMENDATION: The Redevelopment Commission should endorse the attached Request for Proposal for Senior Citizens Housing, a new Senior Citizens Center, improvement to the library, and an option for commercial space on the old Civic Center site and recommend distribution of the Request for Proposal. SVK:gc O CITY OF HunTmGTon BEA ( H DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES P. O. BOX 190, HUNT INGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536.5271 TO:, Redevelopment Commission FROM: Planning Department DATE : November 10 , 1977 SUBJECT : Revised Proposal for Senior Housing and Service Center at Old Civic Center Site In August, 1977, staff presented three alternatives for the use of the Old Civic Center Site for Senior Citizen housing and support services . As origi- nally proposed, the construction of the senior housing units was to include participation by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the Section 8 New Construction Program. Recently, staff has been in- formed by HUD that funds for Section 8 New Construction for- the Elderly will not be available in this federal .government fiscal year (October 1 , 1977 to September 30, 1978) . This information has prompted a reexamination of the original strategy for providing these housing units and has resulted in the refined proposal that is "outlined below and is presented in detail on the attachment. The refined proposal recommends that the City use HCD funds to prepare the site and that it be leased at a nominal cost to a developer that will provide senior and some family housing units , manage and maintain the units , and re- serve a given percentage of the. units for certificate holders in the Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Program as administered by the Orange County Housing Authority. This approach avoids the time consuming process of HUD approval and permits the. City. to select the architect and developer for the project. (This is not possible under the Section 8 New Construction Program. ) However, the maximum rents allowable under the leased housing program are considerably lower than those in the new construction program so it will be necessary for the City to take steps to reduce the cost of the production of these housing units and these steps are also detailed on the attached. Finally, this strategy offers the City the opportunity to demonstrate its com- mitment to providing housing for lower income persons and its willingness to draw upon its own and coordinate outside resources to provide such housing. This project would also bolster the City's other efforts to improve both the physical appearance and economic viability of the Downtown area. RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Commission endorse this refined proposal for the use of the Old Civic Center site in lieu of the three alternatives previously en- dorsed by the Redevelopment Commission and recommend the timely implementation of this project to ,the City Council. Respectfull submitted , Edward D. Selich. Secretary EDS :SVK:gc vLD 'CIVIC CENTER SITE REVISED HOUSING PROPOSAL This revised proposal calls for the provision of approximately 225 elderly end large family housing units , although the exact number and type of units will depend upon the results of a detailed site and funding availability analysis . Additional improvements would include the construction of a new, full service senior citizens center and a face-lift to the existing branch library. To facilitate these improvements the City would be required to pro- vide site improvements with HCD funds and lease the property at a nominal cost to a developer. The City should also use HCD funds to construct the new senior center and should waive the usual development fees to ensure that the housing units are produced for the lowest possible cost. These savings in development cost can then be reflected on each units monthly rentals . The nature and fund- ing of each of these facilities and a budget and cost/benefit analysis of this proposal follows . A. Senior Citizen Housing Project: The proposal calls for. the construction of approximately 200 apartments for senior citizens in a four-story building. Most of these units would be one bedroom but some two-bedroom units may be provided for disabled and handicapped with live-in attendants . The facility would also include complete communal facilities and be designed for handicapped per- sons' use throughout.. Funding: The construction and long-term financing of. these units would be the responsibility of the developer. In return for the lease of the prop- erty at a minimal cost the developer would agree to reserve a share of , these units (approximately 20-50 percent) for certificate holders in the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program. Under this program eligible participants would pay 25 percent of their net monthly income for rent . and the balance would be paid with federal subsidies by the Orange County Housing Authority. The Housing Authority would also have responsibility for screening applicants and administering the subsidy payments . Since a provision of the lease agreement with the developer would require .that the units rent for no more than the federally established Fair Market Rents for the Leased Housing Assistance Program (1 bedroom $240/mo, ; 2 .bedroom $284/mo. ) many other unassisted households could also benefit from this proposal and the mix of subsidized and market rate housing would provide a highly beneficial social situation. B. Large Family Housing Project: The City has submitted an application to SCAG for Section 8 New Construction funds for 100 apartment units for large families. SCAG has agreed to allocate funds to the City if they are granted to SCAG by the federal government in January, 1978 . As part of our agreement with SCAG , the staff proposed that, these units be divided among two sites . We recom- mend that 25 of these be included on the Civic .Center Site. Funding: We would agree with the chosen developer that the developer would submit plans to the federal government for these 25 units and while the developer would have to compete with other developers on other sites within the City, there are few developers interested in this program and it is likely that this developer would be chosen to build these 25 units . After selection, this program works like the Leased Housing Assistance Program except that the Fair Market Rents are substantially higher and this would assure the long-term financial viability of these units . 4 t.� S' Page Two C. Senior Citizens Recreation Center Project: To provide a full service senior citizens center (of approximately 10 ,000 sq. ft. ) to house the activities of the current center at 17th and Orange plus the Transportation-Lunch- Counseling Program. Funding: To construct this center, HCD Funds programmed for im- provements to the existing center should be reprogrammed to this site and a portion of the funds programmed for site acquisition for senior housing may also be reallocated (see attached Budget) . D. Library improvements Project: To provide an exterior "face-lift" for the branch library and a re-landscaping of the building to include reading patios. This would be desirable to carry a uniform architectural and landscaping theme throughout the site. Funding: City funds would be required for this project (see Budget) . OLD CIVIC CENTER REVISED HOUSING PROPOSAL BUDGET' Cost Source A. SITE PREPARATION I. Demolition & Clearance of $ 60, 000 HCD Senior Housing Site Memorial Hall, Fire Station, Administration Building, and Community Clinic 2. Water .and Sewer Improvements 20, 000 HCD Senior Housing Site 3. Grading and Landscape 20, 000 HCD Senior Housing Site Alterations Total Site Improvements $ 100, 000 HCD Senior Housing Site B. NEW SENIOR CENTER 1. Construction of New Facility $ 150, 000 HCD Senior Housing Site 155, 000 HCD Reprogram from existing center Total Center Costs $ 305, 000 C. LIBRARY IMPROVEMENTS . 1. , Building Alterations $ 70, 000 City Funds 2 . Landscape Improvements 30, 000 City Funds Total Library Costs $ 100, 000 City Funds Subtotal (405, 000) HCD Funds Subtotal (100, 000) City Funds GRAND TOTAL $ 505, 000 OLD CIVIC CENTER REVISED HOUSING PROPOSAL COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS PROJECT COST TO CITY VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS 1. Senior Citizen Housing 100 , 000 (HCD) 3 , 750 , 000 (private) 2 . Senior Center (10, 000 sq. ft. ) 305, 000 (HCD) 305 ,000 3 . Family Housing (25 Units) -0- 937 , 500 (private) 4 . Library 100 , 000 (City) 100 , 000 $505 , 000 $5 , 092 , 500 $100, 000 (City) $405, 000 (HCD) Cost/Benefit Ratio: * $1 . 00 cost = $10 . 08 improvements *Not included are lost city revenues through waiver of fees for housing projects, the intangible economic benefits of 225 new households residing in downtown area, nor the taxes paid on improvements . 9 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Ed Selich From H. E. Hartge Planning Director Director of Public Works Subject Sewerage Facilities Around Date November 3, 1977 Old Civic Center Site Sewer lines owned and maintained by the City that would serve the old Civic Center site are located in the alleys between Fifth and Sixth Streets and between Fifth and Main Streets. Either of these lines should be adequate to handle the proposed medium density construction (R3 or R4 with 200 to 300 housing units) in addition to their existing tributary areas under present zoning. The County Sanitation District No. 11 trunk sewer serving the area, located in the alley between Pacific Coast Highway and Walnut Street, is near capacity, and the District is presently not allowing any new major connections within that sewer' s tributary area. The decision as to whether this project will be considered major will have to be made by the District after their review of it. Attached is a map showing the location of the above sewer lines. If you have any questions, contact Jeff Renna at ext. 5510. H. E. Hartge Director of Public Works HEH:JRR:jy Attach. HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DEPT. �i 0 V 19 P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Y Ot NNIN6 ZONING DM 12 SECTIONAL DISTRICT M.AP II-6—II LEGEND: CITYof ADOPTED MARCH T. 1960 O OLOTOWN PL SPECIFIC AN _ YFUR 1 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.7154 MOBILExoME DISTRICT !P2 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISra.CT AMENDED ORDNO- AMENDED ORD.NO ANENDEO 0RD NO. LED SINGLE EAN Lr RESIDENCE DISTAICT . 3-28-60 116 2.16-71 Ig]3 �� TWO FAYILY pE510E ICE DISTRICT HUNTINGT®N BEACH a-I9-61 B91 5-l41 1645 LIMITED BUSINESS FAMILY ISTAICRESIDENCE DISTRICT -6-61 a76 7-5-)1 MISS (] MULTIPLE EAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT 5-7-62 BUD N I ]I '6B2 GExERA1 BUSINE 33°13 TaILT q-1-62 929 I--]2 )94 [ 12-]-62 939 LW43 IBIT ;MLI LIGHT YQISTRIAL DISTRICT 8-5-6] Byy2 a-5-14 192] Efll WAIMUNITY FACILITIES(RECREATIONALD DISTRICT a-19-fi1 996 B-]-). 19lO 1-4-65 INI 6-3-75 1 - - ® COMMUNITY FACILITIESICIVIC)DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I-17-N 1180 a 11, BOB20O � OFFICE PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT 2-2I-66 i106 B:q-15 20IS [C]] NEIW190RHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 7-5-fib 221 2-19i6 202A AMENDED BY ZONE CASE i 6.61 ]OV 1-6-]6 .20e0 63] COMMUNITYBUSINESS DISTRICT 0-I)-61 1316 9-1-76 2111 fE4] HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 101,174.175,201,237,266,281.282,342,347,484,536.545,66-23,66.41,66-68,67-5,76-23 9-18 67 13Ae 1-3-n 2132 En DESIGNATES PRECISE PLAN OF STREET ALIGNMENT e.16-67 N9 fi7-16,67-22,68.39,69-14,69-13.6956,PP70-2,70-10,PP70-4,71-3,71-10,71-29,72-33,72-43,73-26,74-7,75-3C,3-7,78-3,76-19 -6-69 1411 9w6 .-I.0 WH OIL PRODUCTION -21-6 lWM 9 ISx L'OL'7J a-4-69 I115 --- SETBACK LINE -10 ] 2 J -6-70 ISB9 :7' COMBINED WITH OIL PRODUCTION 10-19]0 •606 RI AREA BOUNDED BY PALM ri-,I 12, AVE.ON NE,SEVENTEENTH ST.D 1 ADAMS AVE. ON NW.OCEAN AVE.ON SW,j l 8 SEVENTH Sr.ON SE. ! / V lJ L—JLJ LJI_1 LJL.J�I I I I I I �� �J I I I I I RI-0 RI RI R-I h R-I R-I R2 �: ;B��I`n----=------- e _ RS C4 C4 I 300 - Sao F• O/ D RI RI RI RI R2 ��z1 -0 = Sso _ 4V •��.i F- LOMA AVE PORTLAND AVE i - R5-0 o C 2-O • , 15srrH c•�..1 $'�•,,, �} R I _0L—p�" PORTL4ND cR _ R5-0- I > EH RI RI i RIR2 �D0 RI.0�8 TH001 T 05wEOD AVE. AVE. R2-PD-10 C F-E R I R 1 0 0 0 0 ! 0 0 ::a uw----91"i h C4 R i -000 0000 .'%R2.PD-10.ty:._-•., _ A.RI A. R I NASHVILLE .I�_._): .. L IFIC :i 4FST RI RI Z rwELft� 57 -D PLAN(DI RICT TWO) � - Rz-Po-a� R5 C F R I R I R I -_ R2_PD•10 Y00 AVE ELE VEN iM o0 00�000D OUAV 3D FI'B CF-R 57 I I •P R I o-:Ere_;:!-AR R 2 - R I Q I 1 RI L-NLOLN I R3 C4 ' RI TENT" o0 D0 0171 Do DOI - - 4r RI R2 sr N, R2 RI RI I HNoxvILLE I AVE. I r'P P RI 0pD S IICn ao: =� L N IE I R3 R3 C� TOWN LOREA�ONE C\I F R 2 1Lf J LL��IIL_..I L_j ISECnOx'B•1 / � JUl1ET I AVE. 1 ter . V y" R3 R2 R2 ; Is IDLL=--R3 R3 ; R3. CIN I.I AN A PO L 15 - SAVR 3 R3 ��oD DD 00 D 50 . y HA RTfO RD AVE. ,r Q oD000oaoo sr Pq �, �, GE NE VA D� f f EZ o0000�� / FRAIvHFORT �•�� � 0000� ELMIRA � AVE. I >a� I I I In oDa001 MH oc� - j-9M Q'b b 4.?~ b G� u U 1 U)Z 1 DE� -AVE - _C�,. 1I VA I'-- b h� G� C) I 7 I ID 001 a P 4 �4f V ti Y 4 I• /'Y Q _ h+ HICAGC- .-AVE�d I' Q `v Qb I u TO q `l� M Gam? G� 6ALTIMORE AVE M 5 I �1 % I R2-PD • 9c,/c I 1.� �3 4 `,ti 'c ,��G� , � yti �T ,r,P s' •//`I I R5 ��HIs 50T_OC — G � ti2� --?-ATLANTA� I000 AVE r , n L 0 (� • SCALE IN FEET 1 4 3-.\7 NOTE: / \ ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AN, OIE ADJOINING'7 ANY-HT OF W 15 INTENDED TO EXTEND TO THE CENTER OF SUCH RIGHT OF WAY BEACH i H JNTINGTON �. f i PLANNING DEPT. 4 N�V 3 1977 AVOI OVER0ALOROERS P. 0. Box 190 on Beach,C4 92648 / TO: o�'1 - 1 � GA) Hunting DATE: / 77 FROM: _ ���� - INATEfZ SUBJECT: Ci" lj,6LL, a ;" eL�V N l -� �.- .5."" (�rS'�T"fS.ld ��lel�S — 'b"°" k r�`I��'. `--•-�,'� �`�Y=.' PCB fit' `n c. <::;r vi : . NV- • ROUTING White/Yellow Copy To: Referred Pink Copy To: Originator Return White Copy To Originator When Disposition Is Completed Yellow Cooy Retained Hy Rnlerr Rd ' -p4 .ry-•£ t -_•.,-ti Tn.Wit' �y C� [� �. �_�,�;����� ,' -i ■ GOLDRICH, .KEST A ASSOCIATES 'UNTNG i O N BZ J� BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PLANNING DEFT. PARTNERS iV 1(�� J 61e UNION SANK PLAZA JONA GOLORICW U I V J J 16233 VENTURA BOULEVARD SOL KEST ROBERT NIRSCN P. O BOX 9Q SHERMAN OAKS.CALIFORNIA 91408 ROBERT 1. STERN 081-D288 .872.1741 'mtington Beach; CA 9261� _- Gentlemen: This firm has been, and plans to continue to be, actively engaged in the development of apartment complexes for fami- lies and senior citizens under various HUD programs. In the past 10 years, we have developed approximately 10, 000 units for senior citizens and families. We cur- rently have approximately 1, 000 units in various stages of development, It appears HUD will have a large program to stimulate housing production for families and -senior citizens, but HUD depends on you with respect to the allocation of Section 8 awards through your formulation and submission of Housing Assistance Plans ("HAPs.") . The HAPs or modifications to existing HAPs, we are informed, should be submitted to HUD in .the months of October and November. October and November are also the deadlines for submitting pr.eapproved sites. Incidentally, if you are submitting for Community Develop- ment Block Grants, your HAPs are an integral part of your submission, as. you well know. We would very much like to. know what your HAPs are, or changes you may be making. Additionally, we would like to know what sites, if any, you have proposed or will propose for pre- approval, and what sites you feel to be the most suitable on which to realize your goals. We would be happy to make ourselves available to you should you need a developer ' s perspective in determining feasibility. Material which will help you become acquainted with us is enclosed for your review. It includes a substantial state- ment with respect to our conventional developments. We look forward to hearing from you in the very near future. Respectfully yours, GO D ICH KFST & ASSOCIATES E. G. Aftergut, 'Director of Development Southern California h GOLDRICH, KEST, AND ASSOCIATES The members of Goldrich, Kest, and Associates--Jona Goldrich, Sol Kest, Robert Hirsch, and Robert Stern, have been in the real estate development and construction business since 1954 . The partnership was formed in 1967 , and since its formation has developed many residential and some commercial projects in California and elsewhere. In recent years, we have specialized in the development of apartment complexes with an emphasis on serving the needs of low and moderate-income families and senior citizens, whose rent obligation is partially subsidized under various programs of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment (HUD) . Historically, and this is a policy we plan to continue, we have retained ownership of the apartment complexes developed by us; and to this end we have a management firm, G & K Management Co. , Inc. which currently manages approximately 10, 000 units devel- oped and still owned by us. G & K Management Co. , Inc. will, in addition, manage units currently in process (approximately 1, 000) Below is a summary of only our "HUD Complexes," and enclosed are two tables describing our HUD developments and a third table describing our conventional developments: TYPE UNITS VALUE Apartment Complexes (HUD) 9 , 951 $184 , 400 , 000. 00 August, 1977 TABLE 2 APARTMENT COMPLEXES DEVELOPED BY GOLDRICH, KEST & ASSOCIATES UNDER HUD HUD LOCATION FHA YEAR VALUE IN NUMBER** NAME OF COMPLEX (CITY, COUNTY) SECTION UNITS COMPLETE MILLIONS 101-44146 Argonaut Apartments Denver, Denver 236 Rehab 109 1974 1.9 122-44020 @*Astoria Gardens Sylmar, L.A. 236 136 1970 2.4 121-44440 Bayview Hunters Point Apts. San Francisco, SF 236 146 1976 5.1 122-44020 Beck Park Apartments N. Hollywood, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 120 1975 2.0 121-44335 Blossom Hill Apartments San Jose, S. Clara 236 200 1974 4.2 129-44094* Canyon Apartments Oceanside, S. Diego 236 Military 152 1972 2.5 122-35394 Carondelet Apartments Los Angeles, L.A. 221 (d) (4) 46 U.C. 1.3 121-44381 Casa San Pablo Fresno, Fresno 236 90 1974 1.6 121-35232 Sup Central Park Apartments Mt. View, S. Clara 221 (d) (3) 149 1973 .2.4 122-44103 Cienega Gardens Covina, L.A. 236 180 1971 3.0 143-35017 Citrus Arms Redlands, S.B. 221 (d) (4) 61 1977 1.2 122-44168 Claremont Village Apts. Claremont, L.A. . 236 150 1971 2.8 122-35389 Columbus Terrace Sepulveda, L.A. 221 (d) (4) 42 U.C. 1.1 122-44101 Covina West Apartments W. Covina, L.A. 236 158 1971 2.7 122-55078 De Soto Gardens Canoga Park, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 248 1970 3.9 122-35131 Sup Del Amo Gardens Long Beach, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 230 1971 3.2 122-55096 Del Vista Village Corona, Orange 221 (d) (3) 160 1971 2.6 101-44156 Drehmoor Apartments Denver, Denver 236 Rehab 75 1975 1.45 121-35567 E1 Portal Gardens San Pablo, Contra C.221 (d) (4) 81 U.C. 1.9 129-44060 Escondido Park Apts. Escondido, S.Diego 236 164 1972 2.9 122-44639 Pairview Green Apts. Santa Ana, Orange 236 112 1973 2.1 122-35391 Fallbrook Square Apts. Canoga Park. L.A. 221 (d) (4) 16 U.C. .5 129-35026 Sup Genesee Park Apts. San Diego, S. Diego 221 (d) (3) 170 1972 2.25 121-44427 Grace & Laughter Apts. Dinuba, Tulare 236 40 1974 .6 122-45020 Green Hotel Apartments Pasadena, L.A. 236 Rehab 139 1974 2.5 122-35005 @*Haddon Hacienda Pacoima, L.A. 221 (d) (4) 85 1965 1.1 122-44524 Hollywood Knickerbocker Hollywood, L.A. 236 Rehab 283 1972 5.7 122-44583 Hollywood Plaza Apts. Hollywood, L.A. 236 Rehab 153 1973 3.1 122-55005 @*Hunt Park Apts. Riverside, Riv. 221 (d) (4) 82 1965 1.0 122-44536 Independence Park Apts. Canoga Park, L.A. 236 78 1972 1.3 121-44337 Kings Canyon Apts. Fresno, Fresno 236 74 1974 1.5 122-55059 Kittridge Gardens One Reseda, L.A. 221 (d) (4) 128 1968 1.5 122-55090 Kittridge Gardens Two Reseda, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 80 1970 1.6 122-44010 La Puente Park Apts. La Puente, L.A. 236 133 1910 2.2 122-55018 @*Lakeview Terrace Pacoima, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 128 1968 1.6 121-35540 Lake Merritt Apts. Oakland, C. Costa 221 (d) (4) 51 1977 1.3 122-44106 Las Lomas Gardens La Habra, Orange 236 112 1971 2.0 121--35531 LaSalle Apartments San Francisco, S.F. 221 (d) (4) 145 U.C. 5.8 122-44097* Laurel Canyon Terrace Pacoima, L.A. 236 54 1972 .95 121-44378 Lawrence Road Apts. Santa Clara, S. Cl. 236 Military 86 1973 1.7 122-35384 Lindley Manor Apts. Tarzana, L.A. 221 (d) (4) 51 1977 .93 121-44265 Livermore Gardens Livermore, Alameda 236 96 1975 3.2 122-44537 Meyler Park Apts. San Pedro, L.A. 236 99 1972 1.7 122-35368 Mission Park Apts. Ventura, Ventura 221 (d) (4) 53 1976 .87 122-45030 Nielson Villa Santa Monica, L.A. 221 (d) (4) 100 1977 1.8 112-35069 *##Old Mill Stream Irving, Texas 221 (d) (4) 320 1971 5.2 122-35097 Sup Oxford Park Apts. Los Angeles, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 109 1971 1.6 143-35008 Pacific Terrace Apts. Midway City, Orange 8 98 1976 1.8 122-35240 Sup Palo Alto Gardens Palo Alto, S. Clara 221 (d) (3) 156 1973 2.5 122-35364 Park View Terrace Los Angeles, L.A. 221 (d) (4) 94 1977 2.1 122-55095 Parthenia Townhouses Canoga Park, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 24 1971 .45 122-44553 Pico Plaza Apts. Los Angeles_, L.A. 236 43 1973 .8 TABLE 2 (Continued) HUD LOCATION FHA YEAR VALUE IN NUMBER** NAME OF COMPLEX (CITY, COUNTY) SECTION UNITS COMPLETE MILLIONS 122-44094Sup #Pioneer Gardens SantaFeSprings, L.A.236 141 1970 2.3 122-44528 Placita Apts. SantaFeS. prings, L.A.236 134 1973 2.3 122-35383 Primrose Villa Monrovia, L.A. 221 (d) (4) 76 1977 1.2 122-34277 @*Queen's View Long Beach, L.A. 234 129 1974 4.0 122-35049 Sup Rayen Park Apts. Sepulveda, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 84 1969 .9 122-00108 @*Redlands Oasis Redlands, S. Berdu 207 80 1965 1.2 122-35048 Sup Reseda Park Apts. Reseda, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 132 1970 1.4 122-55022 Roscoe Park Apts. Canoga Park, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 82 1968 1.1 122-35068 Rossmoor Park Apts. Seal Beach, Orange 221 (d) (4) 260 1970 5.0 143-35023 Rosswood Villa Santa Ana, S.A. 221 (d) (4) 199 U.C. 4.9 122-44310 St. Andrews Gardens Los Angeles, L.A. 236 192 1971 3.6 121-44130 San Jose Gardens San Jose, S. Clara 236 176 1971 2.9 121-35217 @*Santa Rosa Apts. Santa Rosa, Sonoma 221 (d) (4) 180 1974 3.5 121-35565 Santa Teresa Apts. San Jose, S. Clara 221 (d) (4) 176 U.C. 5.1 121-35365 Sherman Arms Apts. Reseda, L.A. 8 74 1976 1.3 122-35104 Sup Sherman Park Apts. Reseda, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 135 1971 1.7 121-35534 *Shoreview Apts. San Francisco, S.F. 221 (d) (4) 156 U.C. 5.5 121-44274 Skyline View Gardens S. San Fran. , S.Mat.236 160 1973 3.1 136-35472 Sky Park Terrace Sacramento, Sac. 221 (d) (4) 59 1977 1.2 122-55077 Sunland Park Apts. Sun Valley, L.A. 221 (d) (3) 120 1970 2.0 121-44417 Village Green Apts. San Jose, S. Clara 236 96 1974 2.0 121-44371 Villa Fontana Daly City, S.Mateo 236 119 1975 2.5 143-11002 ##Voltaire Apts. Santa Ana, Orange 223 (f) 562 1972 5.3 122-00080 ##West Covina Apts. W. Covina, L.A. 236 196 1967 3.5 122-35367 Willow Villa Loa Angeles, L.A. 221 (d) (4) 85 1977 .1.5 122-35382 Wilton Wilshire Arms Los Angeles, L.A. 221 (d) (4) 73 U.C. 2.0 TOTAL COMPLEXES 78 9,951 184.4 ** All HUD numbers are followed by "LD". Rent Supplement is indicated by "Sup". # Only 20% Rent Supplement (all other Rent Supplement complexes 100%) . @ Complex is not owned by Goldrich, Kest & Associates (all others are) . * Complex is not managed by Goldrich & Kest, Inc. (all others are) . ## Complexes were not developed by Goldrich, Kest & Associates, but were purchased. UC Under Construction. Revised: September 1977 TABLE 3: CONVENTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS BY GOLDRICH, KEST, HIRSCH & STERN Devel- Now Year oped # Owned * Managed+ Com- Name of Development Location (City, County) By GKHS By GKHS By G & K Size 1p eted Value Anaheim Royale Anaheim, Orange Yes Yes No 174 beds 1976 $ 1,800,000 Arizona Estates Culver City, Los Angeles Yes No No 6 homes 1976 540,000 The Ascot West Hollywood, Los Angeles Yes Yes Yes 60 units 1969 1,400,000 Beachwood Guest Home Hollywood, Los Angeles Yes Yes No 128 beds 1971 900,000 Beverly View Estates Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Yes No No 10 homes 1977 2,500,000 Beverly View Estates II Beverly Hills, Los Angeles Yes No No 10 homes UC 3,000,000 Casa Serrano Los Angeles, Los Angeles Yes Yes Yes 52 units 1971 800,000 Charleston Residential Hotel Las Vegas, Clark Yes Yes No 132 beds 1974 1,400,000 Clairemont Royale San Diego, San Diego Yes Yes No 152 beds 1976 1,750,000 Deauville Marina Marina Del Rey, Los Angeles Yes No No 120 units & 1966 3,500,000 300 boat slips Dolphin Marina Marina Del Rey, Los Angeles Yes Yes Yes 204 units & 1968 5,000,000 450 boat slips Fallbrook Royale Canoga Park, Los Angeles Yes Yes No 154 beds 1976 1,700,000 Gardena Convalescent Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles Yes Yes No 75 beds 1969 525,000 King David Convalescent Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles Yes Yes No 81 beds 1967 550,000 LaHabra Square Shopping Center LaHabra, Orange No Yes Yes 190,000 sq.ft. 1972** 2,200,000 Marina Freeway Building Marina Del Rey, Los Angeles Yes Yes No 170,000 sq.ft 1972 6,000,000 New Breakers Hotel Long Beach, Los Angeles No Yes Yes 270 rooms 1925** 2,000,000 Northridge Campus Residence Northridge, Los Angeles No Yes Yes 376 units 1968** 2,800,000 Northridge Guest Home Northridge, Los Angeles Yes Yes No 132 beds 1973 850,000 Northridge Townhouse Estates Northridge, Los Angeles Yes No No 56 condos UC 5,000,000 Northridge Homes Northridge, Los Angeles Yes No No 10 condos UC 1,600,000 Northridge Village Reseda, Los Angeles Yes No No 154 condos 1967 4,500,000 Ocean Terrace Long Beach, Los Angeles Yes No No 44 condos 1975 2,500,000 Queensview Condominiums Long Beach, Los Angeles Yes No No 127 condos 1974 4,500,000 Reseda Guest Home Reseda, Los Angeles Yes Yes No 122 beds 1974 1,000,000 Royal Gardens Guest Home Studio City, Los Angeles Yes Yes No 146 beds 1971 850,000 Royale Guest Home, San Diego San Diego, San Diego Yes Yes No 108 beds 1975 1,000,000 Royale Palms Guest Home Carson, Los Angeles No Yes No 110 beds 1972** 800.000 Royale West Guest Home Los Angeles, Los Angeles Yes Yes No 102 beds 1969 600,000 Sepulveda Village Mission Hills, Los Angeles Yes No No 68 condos 1965 950,000 Sheraton Convalescent Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles Yes Yes No 155 beds 1967 600,nO0 Sorthridge PoiuLe Humes I Sylmar, Lus Angeles Yes '40 tao 90 homes 1976 4,610,::)- Southridge Pointe Homes II Sylmar, Los Angeles Yes No No 50 homes 1976 2,700,000 Studio village Culver City, Los Angeles Yes No No 126 condos 1965 3,500,000 Sunset Aquatic Park Sunset Beach, Orange Yes Yes Yes 277 boat slips 1970 1,200,000 Sutton Terrace North Hollywood, Los AngelesYes No No 89 condos 1966 3,500,000 Tamarack Shores San Diego, San Diego Yes No No 80 condos UC 5,600,000 Tarzana Estate Homes Tarzana, Los Angeles Yes No No 7 homes 1976 900,000 Trafalgar West Hollywood, Los Angeles Yes No No 48 condos 1966 1,600,000 Tyrone Terrace Sherman Oaks, Los Angeles Yes Yes Yes 24 units 1961 520,000 Valley View Royale Guest Home Garden Grove, Orange No Yes No 160 beds 1974** 950,000 Ventana Homes San Diego, San Diego Yes No No 16 homes UC 3,500,000 Ventura Isle Marina Oxnard, Ventura Yes No Yes 709 boat slips 1971 800,000 Westbrook Royale Guest Home Garden Grove, Orange No Yes No 140 beds 1973** 1,050,000 # Developed primarily by one or more of the four principals: Jona Goldrich, Sol Kest, Robert Hirsch, and Robert I. Stern. * Controlling interest currently vested in one or more of the four principals and/or entities controlled by them. + G & K Management Co., Inc., normally the managing agents for the principals. The hospitals and guest homes are managed by another entity under the auspices of the principals. ** Purchased by the principals, completed by other developers at an earlier date. UC Under Construction y� • CITY . OF HUnTmGTon BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ,. . P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 TO: Redevelopment Commission/Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department DATE: August 5, 1977 . SUBJECT: SENIOR HOUSING ALTERNATIVES FOR THE OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE For some time, the ultimate use of the old .Civic Center site has been debated. One proposal, however, has been consistent over time and that is utilization of the City-owned property for a senior citizen housing ! project. To determine what kind of developer interest exists in this regard, staff is contemplating requesting preliminary development pro- posals be submitted for consideration. Attached are three alternative proposal requests which differ in terms of intensity of development and provision of support services with increased intensity a "trade off" for increased services. . .Each proposal sets forth general development parameters, but will allow individual applicants con- siderable flexibility in achieving the stated goals. In preparing redevelopment plans for Downtown, the value of this site as A catalyst for spurring activity has frequently been noted. The use of the site for a housing project could take advantage of this potential . Senior housing is a well-identified need and the location of site could jserve the existing established senior population in the Downtown vicinity. Because the property is City-owned, development could proceed prior to the completion of the lengthy redevelopment process and .might stimulate new interest in surrounding areas. As well as holding ownership of the site, the City also has a $250,000 fund from the Third Year HCD Program to assist a housing project if necessary. Before proceeding with .this project,_ we request your comments on the following items: i1. Is the old Civic Center site a suitable location for senior housing? i 2. Shall staff proceed with soliciting development proposals ahead of the Redevelopment Plan? 3 .. Which alternative request for proposal conforms with the level of i intensity and support services desired for the site? i I SIXTH ST. a a . a W a PARKING BARKING W O jl FIFTH ST. HUNTINGTON BE4CH C&IFORNIA . EXISTING CONFIGURATION OF PL4NNING DEPARTMENT OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE August, 1977 4 . CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING CONCEPT #1 SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING ONLY 1. This is a lower-intensity concept utilizing the entire site for housing only. 2. The existing municipal buildings would all be removed and the street right-of-way would be abandoned and incorporated into the building parcel for construction of apartment units for the elderly. 3. New structures (s) shall not exceed three stories. 4. Existing mature landscape elements shall be maintained and en- hanced with additional new landscaping. THE SITE LOCATION: Between Sixth and Main Streets and Acacia and Orange Streets in downtown Huntington Beach (see map attached) . USE: The site is occupied by five municipal buildings previously used as the City's Civic Center. Part of the site is the previous right-of-way for Pecan Street that is now used for parking. SIZE: Approximately 5. 44 gross acres. ZONING: CF-C (Community Facilities - Civic Center Uses) This zoning. will revert to R3 & C3 upon discontinuance of civic center use. It is anticipated that the entire site will be zoned R3 with a maximum density of 24. 89 units per acre: GENERAL PLAN: Planning Reserve UTILITIES : All major utilities are available to the site. SERVICES : The Senior Citizens Recreation Center provides recreational and social services for approximately 4000 seniors each month and 2/3 of one mile from the site at 17th & Orange Streets . The Senior Citizens' Transportation-Lunch-Counseling program is currently operated on the site and will be relocated to the Senior Citizens Center. The beach and City pier are four blocks from the site. Bus service by Orange County Transit District is available at the site. Page Two The City Gym with pool and exercise equipment is nine blocks from the site. Major medical facilities are 2 miles from the site. Some shopping facilities and major banking institutions are available in the downtown area, however, major shopping would require travel of approximately one mile. THE PROJECT CONFIGURATION: No building configuration is specified; however, the following design considerations must be followed. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: The project should be oriented to maximize natural light and ventilation in each unit and to maximize. view potential. Movement to, from and within the project should be convenient. Each unit should have a private outdoor space. Indoor and outdoor common areas should be provided. Provision of common use amenities such as security systems , medical alarms , exercise facilities , gardening or outdoor recreation facilities will enhance a proposal. PROPOSAL CONTENTS All proposals should be "design/build" proposals; that is each proposal should represent .a physically sound and economically feasible project. Each proposal should contain at minimum: 1. Preliminary Design a. illustrative plot plan (showing building location, recreational facilities, landscaping, walkways, parking) b. elevations (rendering optional) C. floor. plan of typical unit 2. Preliminary Financial Assessment a. land acquisition cost, building cost, improvement costs and projected revenue b. proposed market rents 9 W- Page Three C. local government assistance type and amount (if any) d. maintenance and management plan and costs SIXTH ST. W a c� O � �P FIFTH ST. AtWk HUNTINGTON BEACH C41FORNIA PROPOSED PLANNING DEPARTMENT SENIOR HOUSING SITE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING CONCEPT #2 SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING., LIBRARY MINOR SERVICE FACILITY . 1. This is a mid-rise concept for the subject- site and includes retention of the existing library, demolition of all other buildings on the site -and use of the site and existing right-of-way for the construction of apartment units for the elderly and to incorporate a minor service facility for seniors. 2. New structures to be constructed shall not exceed seven stories. 3. Existing mature landscape elements shall be maintained and enhanced with additional new landscaping. THE SITE LOCATION: Between Sixth and Main Streets and Acacia and Orange Streets in downtown Huntington Beach (see map attached) . USE: The site is occupied by five municipal buildings previously used as the City' s Civic Center. Part of the site is the previous. right-of-way for Pecan Street that is now used for parking. SIZE: Approximately 4.12 gross acres ZONING: CF-C (Community Facilities - Civic Center Uses) This zoning will. revert to R3 & C3 upon discontinuance of civic center use . It is anticipated that the entire site will be zoned R3 with a maximum density of 24. 89 units per acre. GENERAL PLAN: Planning Reserve UTILITIES: All major utilities are available to the site. SERVICES : The Senior Citizens Recreation Center provides recreational and social services for approximately 4000. seniors each month and 2/3 of one mile from the .site at 17th & Orange Streets. The Senior Citizens' Transportation-Lunch-Counseling program is currently operated on the site and .will be . . relocated to the Senior Citizens Center. The beach and City pier are four blocks from the site. Page Two Bus service by Orange County Transit District is available at the site. The City Gym with pool and exercise equipment is nine blocks from the site. Major medical facilities are 2 miles from the site. Some shopping facilities and major banking institutions are available in the downtown area, however, major shopping would require travel of approximately one mile. THE PROJECT CONFIGURATION: The City has recently adopted a multi-story suffix to the zoning ordinance which could be applied to the site. However,, no preference for multi-story construction is intended for this project. No building configuration is specified, however, the following design considerations must be followed. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS : The project should be oriented to maximize natural light and ventilation in each unit and to maximize view potential. Movement to, from and within the project should be convenient. Each unit should have a private outdoor space. Indoor and outdoor common areas should be provided. Provision of common use amenities such as security systems, medical alarms, exercise facilities, gardening or outdoor recreation facilities •wi.11 enhance a proposal. PROPOSAL CONTENTS All proposals should be "design/build" proposals; that is each proposal should represent a physically sound and economically feasible project. Each proposal should contain at minimum: 1. Preliminary Design a. illustrative plot plan (showing building location, recreational facilities, landscaping, walkways, parking) Page Three b. elevations (rendering optional) c* floor plan of a typical unit 2 . Preliminary Financial Assessment a. land acquisition cost, building costs, improvement costs and projected revenue b. proposed market rents ce local government assistance type and amount (if any) d. maintenance and management plan and costs f' i I i i SIXTH ST ' a Q a ui Q PARKING PARKING W 4- O FIFTH ST, .X�G'b6 HUNTINGTON BEACH cauFORNIA EXISTING CONFIGURATION OF 1-3 OR X' PLANNING DEPARTMENT OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE a + r SIXTH ST. / / / „i ' / W / O / S~- y / / FIFTH ST. HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA SENOR HOUSING WITH lopPLANNING DEPARTMENT MINOR SERVICE FACILITIES CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS i SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING I CONCEPT #3 SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING ( LIBRARY j FULL SERVICE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER . 1. This is higher intensity concept for the subject site and would include: a. Senior citizen apartment units in a building not to exceed i 10 stories. b. Retention of the existing library building. i c. Construction of a new senior citizen center and transfer of the operations of the current center at 17th and Orange to this site. 2. Senior Citizen Center would include meeting rooms , offices , a kitchen, and recreation activities indoors and outdoors and facilities for the Transportation-Lunch-Counseling Program and shall include no less than 12 ,000 sq. ft. THE SITE LOCATION: Between Sixth and Main Streets and Acacia and Orange Streets in downtown Huntington Beach (see map attached) . USE: The site is occupied by five municipal buildings i previously used as the City's Civic Center. Part of the site is the previous right-of-way for Pecan Street that is now used. .for parking. SIZE: Approximately 4.12 gross acres. i ZONING: CF-C (Community Facilities - Civic Center Uses) This zoning will revert to R3 & C3 upon discontinuance• of j civic center use. It is anticipated that the entire site will be zoned R3 with a maximum density of 24.89 units per acre. i GENERAL PLAN: Planning Reserve. UTILITIES : All major utilities are available to the site. SERVICES : The Senior Citizens Recreation Center provides recreational and social services for approximately 4000 . seniors each month and 2/3 of one mile from the site at 17th & Orange Streets. Page Two The Senior Citizens' Transportation-Lunch-Counseling program is currently operated on the site and will be relocated to the Senior Citizens Center. The beach and City pier are four blocks from the site. Bus service by Orange County Transit District is available at the site. The City Gym with pool and exercise equipment is nine blocks from the site. Major medical facilities are 2 miles from the site. Some shopping facilities and major banking institutions are available in the downtown area, however, major shopping would require travel of approximately one mile. THE PROJECT CONFIGURATION: The City has recently adopted a multi-story suffix to the zoning ordinance which could be applied to the site. However, no preference for multi-story construc- tion is intended for this project. No building configuration is specified, however, the following design considerations must be followed. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS : The project should be oriented to maximize natural light and ventilation in each unit and to maximize view potential. Movement to, from and within the project should be convenient. Each unit should have a private outdoor space. Indoor and outdoor common areas should be provided. Provision of common use amenities such as security systems, medical alarms, exercise facilities , gardening or outdoor recreation facilities will enhance a proposal. Page Three PROPOSAL CONTENTS All proposals should be "design/build" proposals; that is each proposal should represent a physically sound and economically feasible project. Each proposal should contain at minimum: 1. Preliminary Design a, illustrative plot plan (showing building location, recreational facilities , landscaping, walkways , parking) b. elevations (rendering optional) C. floor plan of typical unit 2. Preliminary Financial Assessment a. land acquisition cost, building cost, improvement costs and projected revenue b. proposed market rents ce local government assistance type and amount (if any) d. maintenance and management plan and costs f SIXTH ST. W . a LF V Q Q PARKING PARKING ` S1. FIFTH ST. HUNTINGTON BEACH CALIFORNIA EXISTING CONFIGURATION OF `" Ton- PLANNING DEPARTMENT OLD CIVIC CENTER SITE SIXTH ST. ui i ig i i i i i FIFTH ST. HUNTINGTON BEACH C4LIFORNIA SENIOR HOUSING WITH PLANNING DEPARTMENT FULL SERVICE FACILITIES j January 17 , 1977 TO: HCD COMMISSION CC : Mayor and City Council Planning Department The presentation of the proposal to acquire the Old Civic Center site from the City for location of a self-contained retirement complex was not effectively communicated for several reasons , including its sim- plicity as an alternative to a major problem and the fact that the HCD meeting on the 13th was my 3rd public meeting that day as a volunteer. Now, the facts are that there is insufficient time for our commission to act on the proposal but that does not eliminate rationale and objective analysis . It is quite easy to get symbalistic when we sit as volunteers offering direction of the spending of Federal dollars . Some objectivity is added when we individually realize that we are primarily taxpayers . The acquisition of the Civic Center site makes sense because it first satisfies the prime objective of the enabling legislation that caused us to be appointed in the first place, that is "the primary objective of this title is the development of viable urban communi- ties , by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities , principally for persons of low and moderate income. . . " There are seven specific sub-areas that the Act spells out for evaluation in project selection criteria: 1) The elimination of slums and blight and the prevention of blighting influences and the deterioration of property and neighborhood and community facilities of importance to the welfare of the community, principally persons of low and moderate income. a) There is NO question that the area is blighted, that the property surrounding DQ page two - it is deteriorating and that community facilities are not adequate. 2) The elimination of conditions which are detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare, through code enforcement, demolition, interim rehabilitation assis- tance, and related activities . 2a) All the elements -of 1 and 2 are documents in over 21 hours of sworn public testimony on redevelopment. 3) The conservation and expansion of the • Nation' s housing stock in order to provide a decent home and a suitable living environment for all persons, but princi- pally those of low and moderate income. 3a) The proposal ' s intent is to establish (not promise or talk about) such housing stock. 4) The expansion and improvement of the quantity and quality of community services , principally for persons of low and moderate income, which are essential for sound commu- nity development and for the development .of viable urban communities . 4a) The inclusion of library facilities , reli- gious facilities , open space and recreation as part of the complex goes beyond any hopes of the drafters of this legislation. 5) A more rational utilization of land and other natural resources and the better arrange- ment of residential , commercial , industrial , recreational , and other needed activity centers . 5a) The key, parking on the current site, specific health and welfare related commercial facilities and free time areas add_ up to a 100 point rating. 6) The reduction of the isolation of income groups within communities and geographical areas and the promotion of an increase in the diversity page three and vitality of neighborhoods through the spatial deconcentration of housing opportunities for persons of lower income and the revitalization of deter- iorating or deteriorated neighborhoods to attract persons of higher income. 6a) It in fact accomplishes this in a very real way. 7) The restoration and preservation of properties of special value for historic, arhitectural , or aesthetic reasons . 7a) Well, 6 out of & isn' t bad. Above and beyond all of this is the macro or total perspective we must maintain as part of our objectivity. It is the socio-economic implication of our decisions that must be weighed. The spill-over effect of this retirement project will itself reward the community for the investment by forcing other below standard and below code surrounding property to more speadily rehabilitate so that there is in fact more revenue to the general fund and subsequently a continuing effort to subsidize the property tax burden. Thank you all for your time. I hope that I have at least pointed out that we must look beyond each and every dollar proposal to see that the real cost/benefit relation- ship is of our decisions. Very my yo s , qA� DAVID PROFALO DPG/lcb } rs k ,y January 13 , 1977 ' TO: HOUSING AND COMMUNITY" DEVELOPMENT: COMMISSION.: CC : Mayor and City Council Redevelopment Commission r Planning Commission _ Project Area Committee- - Planning Department The HCD fund allocation event is upon us . The alternatives are many. , The proposal is simple, the- need substantiated not only in days of sworn testimony, but across the face of America. The old Civic Center site could be purchased with HCD funds from the Redevelopment Agency. That location is many things to many people; it . could be a very special thing to some very special people. And, the side effects , spill-over benefit to the downtown specifically, and the community at large, is immeasurable. Allocated HCD funds would be used to purchase the site from the Redevelopment Agency. The Housing Authority could have reasonable success in marketing the project to anyone of several many HCD contractors . A senior citizen building is only what the most limited imagination would envision. A self-contained total facility could only be some policy decisions away. A facility with the first floor of dedicated commer- '� cia"l specifically oriented to the residents' needs such as banking, pharmaceutical, etc . could be enhanced even to a greater degree by creating on the second floor the well- ,ih established need for a community/satellitelibrary facility to be enjoyed by the tenants and used by the local area. This is a limitless opportunity that could include open space, and non-dinomensional spiritual facilities . 2- Y Support from the leading churches in the area could prove to be a devastating leadership factor as one of the few elements in contemporary community life that identifies with- our forgotten elderly.: The area would get an investment infusion that could stimulate the private investor to see the advantage of additional development . The people, would - see the political process working along social lines that demonstrate that democracy works , the agency would pay its debt to the general fund and we all can be proud to be part of the system. .. r Of course , I have simplified the process . The request is to consider what I consider to be one obvious and meaningful alternative. -j Respectfully yours , DAVID P. GAROFALO DPG/lcb - s, 1 1 ' HUNTINGTON TOWN. VILLAGE .1 1 1 1 ORIGINS OF THE VILLAGE The Huntington Town Village is a unique solution to a unique set of needs in the central downtown area of Huntington Beach. This document presents , the concepts for cooperative public and private action for the design, construction, and operation of this village-like urban environment. The Huntington Town Village blends a rich variety 1 of uses to fulfill a number of current and on-going needs: o Senior citizen housing. o Senior citizen community center. ' o Community services. o Urban park space. ' . o Commercial services. o Bus loading and transfer. .o Necessary parking. We believe this combination of publicly and privately owned uses can be blended skillfully to form an environment strongly reminiscent of the Humane European Village. It can emerge as a part of the City the citizens will use and point to with civic pride. The old. Civic Center site is suggested as the location for the Huntington- Town Village. The site already houses many community services in a variety of buildings of varying age and condition: o Library. o Jaycees. o Allied Arts Gallery. 1 o Manpower. o Youth Employment Service. . o Legal Aid Society. ' 0 Ass-istencia Legal . o Red Cross. o Human Resources Council . o Catholic Social Service. o Voluntary Action. ' o Salvation Army. o United Crusade. o Probation. o Free Clinic. ' o Family and Marriage Councel . The site previously had been given consideration as the location for the proposed Senior Citizens Community Center. Also, it is in an ideal central ' position within the new .redevelopment areas. A unique joint effort of public and private partici- pation can be designed to carry this project from the concept phase, through development, and into joint ownership and management. The condominium concept is but one. possible structure which could be pursued. In the following sections the urban design and architectural considerations are explored. Possible alternatives for physical integration are - presented followed by a suggested structure for implementation. ' We are pleased to present this concept of Huntington Town Village for your consideration. KCS Systems Incorporated EDAW ' William L. Pereira Assoicates 1 URBAN DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS This section addresses the proposed Huntington Town Village and its relationship within the 1 surrounding urban context (present and future) . As mentioned, the complex we visualize would achieve a vital intimate environment similar to many European villages. The discussion that follows ' deals with three areas of concern: o Village organization and scale hierarchy, ' both inter-site and intra-site. o Village accessibility to multiple user groups. o Village connectivity to other commun.ity services and facilities. 1 . Vill.age Organization and Scale Hierarchy: ' Using -the European Village as a prototype, the multiuse complex would be designed with regard for a hierarchy of organization and scale which is pedestrian oriented and relates to the surrounding community, e.g. , smaller public spaces instead of massive uncomfortable spaces; smaller scale building instead of high-rise towers. A hierarchial organization continuum from the most public spaces to the most private 1has been developed by Chermayeff and Alexander. They termed six domains of urbanity: urban public, urban semi-public, group public, group private, 1 family private and individual private. In the transition from one type of place to another, security and privacy are usually accomplished by some type .of barrier, "lock"., or buffer zones. ' The six domains are defined as they would relate to Muli-Use Complex context. ' o Urban Public - The places and facilities in public ownership: streets, paths, civic parks, beach. ' o Urban Semi-Public - The special areas of public use under government and institution control : public transit, libraries, hospitals, theaters . o Group Public - Meeting ground between public services and utilities and private property requiring joint access and responsibility: places requiring mail delivery, utility control ; garbage collection. 1 . Serge Chermeyeff & Christopher Alexander, Community and Privacy, p. 119. 1 o. Family Private .- The spaces within the private domain controlled by a family bnit devoted to communal activities : eating, entertainment, etc. (both interior and exterior space) . ' o Individual Private - The innermost sanctum. Inter-Site: The relationships between the site's external ' and internal uses is one of physical and visual adjacencies, linkages, and barriers . On-site public areas should be linked by a common pedes- trian way which connects to primary off-site pedestrian and transit circulation on Main and Orange Streets. The most private spaces should be physically separated from public uses and ' off-site uses, but linked through intermediate buffer zones which connect with the common spaces. ' Intra-Site: Proposed on-site uses for the Senior Citizen's complex vary widely from public to private. ' The Library is a viable .use and should be main- tained. The mature fan and canary date palm trees planted along the edges of the site are an asset and would provide the new center with an . image and link to the past. These palms have shallow roots and can be moved to new 1 locations on-site with no major problems. The remainder of the site would accommodate activi- ties and services proposed in the Architecture Program for the Senior Citizen 's complex in addition to Senior Citizen Housing existing on- site, public services, new public services, and supporting commercial . . The proposed uses can be grouped into three primary domains of privacy and security: ' Urban Semi-Public includes the existing library, public services, and supporting commercial services; Group Public includes a majority of the activities proposed in the Senior Citizen's ' complex program; and Private (Group, Family, and Individual ) includes all residential activities. As mentioned, the transfer from one type of place to another is accomplished through "locks" , or buffer zones. With a hierarchy of these transition areas, the residents and center users are provided the choice in the amount of privacy and security they prefer. The hierarchy of a village scale conforms with the organizational hierarchy principle. The scale of adjacent structures should change ' gradually, not suddenly. The development would respect the size and height of adjacent uses. Above all , the development would have spaces which are intimate and comfortable ' instead of overwhelming. 2. Village Accessibility to Multiple User Groups: ' The Multi-Use Complex provides services for not only the resident and non-resident senior citizen, but also the community at large. The complex should therefore be readily accessible to these non-resident user groups. ' The accompanying diagram illustrates the re- lationship between user groups and the proposed services of the Multi-Use Complex.. All of the user groups would utilize the library, clinic, miscellaneous community. services (currently housed in the community service center) , civic mini-park, and commercial services. The Senior Citizens ' center is for use by both resident and non-resident senior citizens. Public Transit: Four of five Huntington Beach bus lines converge ' at Main and Orange Streets and have bus stops adjacent to the site. . Line 1 o.n Pacific Coast Highway is three blocks south.. Future mass ' transit proposals studied by OCTD include a transit line adjacent to Lake Street with a stop in the vicinity of Lake and Orange Streets. ' A mini bus system implemented and operated by the Multi-Use Complex could provide transit service to activities and facilities off-site (e.g. , Civic Center, shopping, and beach) . ' Vehicular: Secondary and local streets provide adequate ' vehicular accessibility. Site access can be provided from three sides (5th, Orange and 6th) . Pedestrian: Most streets within. walking distance of the site have adequate sidewalk areas. Many side- walks do not have ramps provided at pedestrian crossings. This feature needs to be incorpor- ated in the Multi-Use Complex as well as on ' surrounding streets. All .the proposed Redevelopment Plan Alternative ' Concepts would improve the pedestrian environ- ment from the site toward the beach by removing or reducing traffic on Main Street. ' 3. Village Connectivity to Other Community Services and Facilities: ' The area around the old Civic Center at present contains many services and facilities which senior citizens utilize and rely upon (e.g. , library, free clinic, other community service organizations , and shopping) . In addition, many churches, the ocean and the new Civic Center are in close proximity. Many of these services are. within walking distance and/or are are accessible via public transit which has stops at the site. Main Street provides the ' primary pedestrian linkage to most of these facilities and transit stops. ' Non-resident seniors and non-seniors attracted to the facilities provided on-site would be exposed to other off-site facilities of the area. As ' mentioned, a mini bus system could be instituted linking the complex with off-site facilities , thus improving the access for both residents and non- residents attracted to the site. The street network provides adequate vehicular access to these off-site facilities plus those ' beyond walking distance (e.g. , two hospitals -within 5 minutes drive, local golf courses , regional shopping centers, etcetera) . As mentioned, vehicular site access and egress can be provided via 5th, Orange and 6th Streets. Summer .beach traffic causes congestion in the vicinity of Pacific Coast Highway. The site is not greatly affected since Lake, Beach and 17th Streets carry a majority of this beach traffic. 1 FACILITY DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS This section expresses the internal requirements and priorities which impact the quality of life style of the resident senior citizens of Huntington ' Town Village. Six factors are covered: o Safety and security. o Activities and social functions. o Community services and support facilities. ' o Mobility. o Comfort factors. o Unit requirements. 1 . Safety and Security: The dominant priority of most senior citizens is ' the desire for maximum security and safety. An overriding fear: of "violence in the streets" has great impact on the planning for security within ' the living area. There must be protected enclosure, gate control , adequate guard and/or police patrol , and strict limitations on visitor passes . The residents must be able to live, participate in activities, and move about the Center without fear and with a feeling of complete safety. The challenge will be to accomplish the above while ' avoiding the walled compound-armed camp appearance. Judicious treatment of entrance gates, windows, screens, walled enclosures, and transition areas ' will be required as well as proper lighting and alarm systems. ' 2. Activities and Social Functions: There is a strong desire among the majority of senior citizens to keep busy - to continue to be occupied and interested in activities. Group participation is extremely important to counteract the possibility of pervading loneliness. ' Examples of activities and social functions are as follows: ' o . Art classes and sculpture. 0 Photography. - o Sewing and yarn crafts . ' o Drama, choral and singing groups, vaudeville, etc. . o Book reviews. ' o Card playing. o Travel and travel shows. o Handicrafts , such as lapidary, ceramics, jewelry, etc. ' o Wood shops. o Swimming/Therapy Pool . o Bowling, shuffleboard, billiards, horseshoes, etc. o Dancing. ' o Fishing on the pier. o Limited golf privileges at nearby golf course. ' o Gardening. ' o Church groups and fellowship organizations. Reference is made to the VTN Architectural Program for Senior Citizens Center, dated October 9, 1974, for a more detailed listing of activities and related space needs. 3. Community Services and Support Facilities: Presently, the Community Service Center and Free ' Clinic,. which now provide many of the recommended services for senior citizens, occupy portions of the site. Also, on the site are the branch public library and the Allied Arts Gallery, each serving ' as excellent social and activity centers. The inclusion within the complex of limited commercial facilities such as groceries, pharmacy, cleaners,' ' barber shop, beauty shop, coffee shop, and travel agency designed to the scale of a small village marketplace would further enhance the quality of life style while providing easy access to everyday . necessities . 1 In addition to the Free Clinic there should be some in-house medical capability provided either by ' residents with medical experience or a part-time staff nurse. ' Launderies, which become excellent socialization areas, should be located on each level with ade- quate folding and work areas. Covered auto parking ' for residents should include lockable storage. Trash areas must be easily accessible but concealed from view. Maintenance would be on a 24-hour call . ' Recreation rooms with kitchen facilities should be conveniently located to serve as activity/social centers for group functions , such as potluck dinners, ' card playing, etcetera. 4. Mobility: ' Stairs and steps should be eliminated wherever possible. Corridors and passageways should be wider than usual , and ramps should be more gradual than usual . Elevators ' serving each level should be sized to accommodate wheelchairs, laundry/grocery carts, and furniture. ' Building groupings could be interconnected with bridges and/or "plaza" areas providing outdoor or - semi-enclosed spaces for group gatherings and rest areas. Public transportation now serves the site ' and should be coordinated into an overall program. As mentioned previously, a supplemental means of providing mobility would be a mini-bus system trans- porting senior citizens to the pier, park areas, and to church on Sunday mornings. 5. Comfort Factors: ' Excessive noises can be especially disruptive and annoying to older people therefore the site should ' be semi-isolated from main traffic arteries. While the prevailing winds will have a cooling effect, thus eliminating the need for air conditioning, they create discomfort if not properly screened and ' buffered. The wind off the ocean also brings damp- ness which should be considered, in patio planning and orientation. The heating system should be free of drafts; consideration might be given to radiant heating in lieu of forced air. All spaces, other than kitchen, bath, and utility areas, should be carpeted. This serves as a safety factor as well as an improvement in general appearance, comfort, and acoustical qualities. ' Wall -surfaces should be smooth with all sharp corners eliminated. Lighting should be at a brighter level than is normally required and should be as uniform as possible. Color differentiation and tonal' contrasts ' should be emphasized to compensate for the ex- pected reduction in eyesight of the residents . 6. Unit Requirements: ' Residential unit makeup should be divided between bachelor, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom apartments, the latter with 1z baths. Most residents expect to have occasional overnight guests, thus should be provided with added sleeping facilities. Many of the residents will retain their personal furniture, consequently built-ins or furnished ' units may be kept to a minimum. Automatic dish- washers are unnecessary; however, small multi- purpose ovens can be very useful in that cooking is usually done in small amounts and often for only one person. Kitchens, therefore; may be small but easily accessible. Window areas can be reduced thus maximizing both energy conservation and flexibility in room arrangement. iSmall patios and/or balconies should be included to provide private outdoor areas and. garden centers. ' The overall concept should be informally residential in character yet must incorporate the applicable recommendations evolved through research from such orgainizations as the Gerontoloqy Research and Study Center at the University of Southern California and the Orange County Council on Aging. 1 1 . 1