Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHousing & Community Development Program - Fourth Year Applic t 4,S 00 E Sys -%2,7o Housing & Community Development Program s Fourth Year Application Prepared By CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH H Housing & Community Development Program Fourth Year Application i Prepared By it CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH f ' y � � v • • PREFACE This document contains the federal application prepared by the City of Huntington Beach for Fourth Year Housing and Community Develop- ment Block Grant Funds of $1 . 290 million as authorized under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. Also included herein is the Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan for 1978 and the documentation necessary for the federal application . A The assistance of the Southern California Association of Govern- ments (SCAG ) in the preparation of this application is gratefully acknowledged . r CITY OF AUNT LNGTON 13E.AC11 FOURTH YEAP HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS City Council Transmittal Resolution of Adoption Preface i Table of Contents ii List of Tables iv List of Figures v 1 . Community Development Program Summary 1 1 . 0 The Housing & Community Development Act of 1974 3 1 . 1 The Community Development Application 4 1. 2 The First, Second & Third Year Program 5 1 . 3 Citizen Participation 7 2 . 0 Formulating the Community Development Program 9 2 . 1 Statement of Community Needs 10 2 . 2 Long-Term Objectives 10 2 . 3 Short-Term Objectives 10 2 . 4 Criteria for Third Year Program 10 2 . 5 Community Development Projects 10 Exhibit A: Statement of Community Needs 14 Exhibit B: Long-Term Objectives 17 Exhibit C : Short-Term Objectives 19 Exhibit D : Recommended Projects for Fourth 21 Year Entitlement Exhibit E : Recommended Projects for Fifth 22 and Sixth Year Funding 2 . Housing Assistance Plan Summary 23 1. 0 Introduction 25 1 . 1 Contents of the Housing Assistance Plan 26 1 . 2 Assisted Housing Funding 26 ii Aft • TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 2 . 0 Condition of the Housing Stock 28 3. 0 Housing Assistance Needs of Lower Income 31 Households 3. 1 Sound Housing/Rent Gap Analysis 31 3 .2 Impacted Groups 32 3 . 3 Anticipated Future Assisted Housing Needs 34 4 . 0 Specified Realistic Annual and 3-year Goals 37 for Assisted Housing 5. 0 Location of Assisted Housing Units 42 3. Environmental Assessment 48 1. 0 Program Description 48 2 . 0 Environmental Setting and Impact 50 • 4 . Appendices Appendix A: Federal Application 53 Appendix B: Third Year Grantee Performance Report 73 Appendix C: CAC Narrative Report 119 Appendix D: Letters of Comment i LIST OF TABLES 2-1 Survey of Housing Conditions 29 2-2 Substandard Housing Units Suitable for 30 Rehabilitation 1977 2-3 Housing Supply/Demand Distribution 32 2-4 Housing Assistance Plan: Senior Citizens , 1977 35 2-5 Housing Assistance Plan: Large Families, 1977 36 2-6 Housing Assistance Plan: Housing Unit 40 Allocations , 1977 2-7 Housing Assistance Plan: Three Year Housing Unit 41 Allocations iv • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM huntington beach planning department SUMMARY This document represents a preliminary fourth-year Community Develop- ment Program. It is in response to the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. The Act entitles the City of Huntington Beach to receive $4. 7 million over a six year period for projects designed to prevent or eliminate slums and blight, assist low and moderate income families and meet urgent community development needs . For the last two years the City ap- plied for and received entitlements totaling 2 . 3 million . The first , second and third year Community Development Programs identified community development needs , developed long term objectives designed to meet those needs , specified short term community development objectives that would be accomplished within the first three years of the Housing and Community Development Act, and proposed specific projects for funding during the first three program years . This document contains a proposed fourth-year Community Development e, Program. It is intended that this program continue to meet the community development needs , and long and short term objectives identified in the previous years ' programs . It also proposes additional projects that will be funded by the fourth-year entitle- ment of $1 . 290 million . This report outlines the provisions of the 1974 Act as they apply to Huntington Beach and explains the process used to formulate the City ' s preliminary Community Development Program. (The Housing Assistance Plan , also required by the Act , is discussed in a fol - lowing section of this document . ) S A major requirement of the application procedure is citizen par- ticipation and to meet this criterion as well as to ensure that the Community Development program ultimately adopted reflects the needs and desires of the public, the City relied on the findings of various staff investigations supplemented by public meetings . However , in an effort to expand the role of citizens in formulating the Community Development Program, the City Council appointed a Citizen Advisory Committee. The Committee , representing a variety of organizations , conducted public meetings to obtain ideas from citizens and other organizations . The Committee then evaluated City Staff and citizen input. Its efforts culminated in the presentation of a recommended fourth-year program. Specifically , this eleven project , $1 . 290 million program adopted by the Citizen Advisory Committee is designed to accomplish these objectives : 1 . Meet important community needs that might otherwise be neg- lected because of inadequate financial resources . 11 �, � 1 + 1 2 . Comply with federal criteria by presenting a balanced program addressing the problems of blight , the plight of low income residents and community development needs . 3 . Avoid committing the City to activities that will add long-range costs to the already burdened financial structure. The recommended projects are explained and analyzed in Section 2. 5 and outlined below: 1 . Continued funding for the Neighborhood Preservation/Rehabili - tation Loans Program ($250 ,000 ) . 2 . Provision of Smoke Detectors in conjunction with the Neighbor- hood Preservation Program for elderly and handicapped households ($30 ,500) . 3. Provision of an emergency medical information system for target Neighborhoods (5 ,500 ) . 4. Construction of Cypress/Ash Streets storm sewer in Oak View ( $95 ,000 ) . 5 . Removal of architectural barriers to the mobility of handicapped and elderly persons ($40 ,000) . 6 . First year of funding in a three year program of public utility improvement , building rehabilitation , and street improvements in a six-block area of Downtown ( $271 ,000) . 7 . Provision of outdoor recreation improvements , landscaping and fencing for play area at the Oak View Community Center ($75 ,000 ) 8 . Acquisition of vacant land to enlarge proposed park site in the Old Town area ($200 ,000) . 9. Provision of parking facilities for an historic landmark : The Newland House ($25 ,000) . 10. Construction of storm sewer in Michael Drive ($175 ,000 ) . 11 . Provision of a traffic signal at 17th and Orange Streets ($47 ,000) . These recommended projects are intended to serve the interest of the community while satisfying the requirements imposed by federal regulations . Should any of these projects be judged unacceptable by the Department of Housing and Urban Development , the City will have the opportunity to substitute additional projects - such as those listed in Exhibit E . As well , should conditions change during the program ' s implementation phase , the City is also per- mitted to reallocate among approved projects or submit new projects to HUD for approval . 2 s 1 . 0 THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 During the decade of the sixties , the Federal Government initiated numerous urban and social development programs to deal with the growing problems faced by cities in America . The Housing and Community Development Act (HCD) , signed into law by President Ford in August , 1974 , consolidates these several programs into one "block grant" system designed to facilitate a comprehensive approach to S community development. As stated by Congress , the primary objective of the Act is to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing , a suitable living environment , and expanded economic opportunities principally for low and moderate income families . Grant assistance is provided for community development activities that prevent or eliminate slums and blighted conditions , that assist low and moderate income families , or that meet urgent community development needs . Specifically , the Act entitles the City of Huntington Beach to $4. 1 million over a six year period . Of this amount, 2 . 3 million was available to and successfully applied for by the City in the first , second and third entitlement years . The fourth year entitle- ment is $1 . 290 million . These funds , as stipulated by Congress , can be expended for the following types of programs . 1 . eliminating blight and deterioration .. . :. 3 2 . eliminating conditions detrimental to public health , safety , and welfare 3 . conserving and expanding the housing stock 4 . expanding and improving community facilities 5 . rationally utilizing land and other natural resources 6. promoting neighborhood vitality and diversity 7 . restoring and preserving properties of special interest or significance . The intent of the Act is to encourage physical development. Social services are assigned only secondary importance by the Act under the assumption that alternative funding is available for such projects . As a result , the major emphasis of the Community Development Program must be toward physical development projects even though social service programs are badly needed . The Act specifies that social services are fundable only if they are under- taken in conjunction with physical development or if no other funding sources can be employed . Therefore , the task facing the City in continuing to implement the Housing and Community Develop- ment Act is to maintain a comprehensive program of development activities that meet federal criteria while fulfilling the City ' s evolving housing and community development needs . 1 . 1 The Community Development Application To secure the funds entitled to Huntington Beach under the Housing and Community Development Act , the City must file an application each year with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) . The application consists of two phases : a Housing Assistance Plan (a separate section of this document) and a Community Development ( CD ) Program. The requirements for the Community Development Program are clearly specified in HUD regulations . Specifically , the CD Program must include : 1 . assessment and identification of community development problems and needs ; 2 . a statement of long-term objectives to be accomplished over time ; 3 . a statement of short-term objectives to be accomplished within three years ; and am an on Adft RIF 4. a one-year program to be funded by the City ' s annual entitlement . And lastly , the Community Development program must include citizen input in its formulation . 1 . 2 The First Year Program The City ' s first year entitlement was $460 ,000. Citizen and City 41 Staff input resulted in the funding of a variety of projects that were aimed at benefiting low and moderate income families , elimin- ating blight and meeting urgent community development needs . These Projects were approved in the first year and the funding amounts are as follows : 1 . Citizen participation for the second $ 10 ,000 year HCD Program 2. Assistance to the Orange County $ 10 ,000 Housing Authority for a Tenant Relations Officer t 3 . Community Analysis Project $ 20 ,000 4. Upgrade substandard water facilities $ 50 ,000 in the Townlot Area 5. Funds for substandard lot preliminary $ 89 ,500 redevelopment studies for the Downtown area 6. Wheel chair ramp installation $ 50 ,000 7 . Senior citizen van , recreation $ 25 ,500 equipment and facility renovation 8. Community Center or park for depressed $100,000 areas and/or Old Town 9. Swimming facilities for the handicapped $105 ,000 As previously mentioned , the application for these funds must include a Housing Assistance Plan . The initial plan submitted in the first entitlement year cited a need for approximately 6 ,525 low income housing units . While the City requested 330 assisted housing units , it was allocated only 144. As of December, 1976 , fifteen units had been leased to very low income families . The Second Year Program The City ' s second year entitlement was $690 ,000. Again , through the process of citizen and staff input the following projects were Ib IP selected to benefit low- and moderate-income families , eliminate blight , and meet urgent community needs : 1 . Construction of Community Center and $109 ,000 Human Service Center to be operated by Boy ' s Club at Bushard school site 2 . Expansion of handicapped pool and $110 ,000 community swim complex at Ocean View High School 3 . Assistance to the Orange County $ 10,000 Housing Authority for Tenant Relations Officer 4. Outdoor recreation facilities for Senior $ 50 ,000 Citizens Center 5. Storm drain project , Delaware Street , $300 ,000 Adams to Yorktown 6. Loan to Human Resources Council for $ 38 ,000 Day Care Center 7 . Loan to Redevelopment Agency for $ 30 ,000 architectural , engineering and consulting activities for Downtown Project 8. Shamel ash tree removal project $ 43 ,000 The second year application included the required Housing Assistance Plan . The corrected version of the HAP (as submitted to HUD on July 14, 1976 ) documented that 8 ,253 households required housing assistance . The City ' s goal for assisted Section 8 existing units was 617 , but the City received an allocation of 335. As of January 1 , 1977 , approximately 228 of these units were under lease to low- and moderate-income families . The Third Year Program The City ' s third year entitlement was $1 . 233 million . The following projects were selected for funding with the third year entitlement and in addition $285 ,000 of previous years ' project were reprogrammed to third year activities : 1 . Local Option Activities $ 24,950 2 . Construction of Old Town Storm Sewer $300 ,000 Phase II 3 . Acquisition of a site for Senior Citizens $250,000 Housing • 4. Additional funding for construction $205 , 300 of Bushard Community Center 5 . Construction of 3 ,000 sq . ft . addition to $105 ,000 Senior Citizens Recreation Center 6. Construction of a Day Care Center at Oak $165 ,000 View 7. Additional Handicapped Mobility Projects $ 43 , 500 8. Initial funding of the Neighborhood $100,000 Preservation/Rehabilitation Loans Program 9. Station wagon and Bilingual Training for $ 12 ,500 Oak View Center 10. Provision of exercise and physical $ 20,000 therapy equipment for the elderly and handicapped at City Gym 11 . Construction of Del Mar Storm Sewer $200 ,000 12 . Code Enforcement Program for dangerous $ 40 ,000 buildings in Downtown The third year Housing Assistance Plan documented that 9 ,640 house- holds required housing assistance. The City ' s goal for Section 8 existing units was 650 units ; however, the total allocation of Section 8 units in December, 1977 was 335 . Of these approximately 320 were under lease in December, 1977 and the expected new allocation of 136 units will only accommodate a portion of those qualified households on the waiting list maintained by the Orange County Housing Authority . 1 . 3 Citizen Participation A major requirement of the Housing and Community Development Act is citizen participation in the formulation of the CD Program and a Housing Assistance Plan . The intention of the Act is that the programs adopted reflect the needs and desires of the residents of the community. During the first and second entitlement years application process , the City relied on the finding of the Policy Plan , two series of Community Forums and public hearings be of re both the Planning Commission and City Council for this valuable 1 input. During the third entitlement year, the City use of the General Plan , public meetings and public hearings before the Plan- ning Commission and City Council , a Citizen Advisory Committee , and a community opinion survey to formulate the CD Program. In the fourth year a Citizens Advisory Committee was also used. Adft 7 The Housing and Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee was formed primarily to increase citizen participation in the formulation of each year ' s community development program. The committee represents a variety of boards and commissions active in Huntington Beach as well as citizens at large. Specifically, the responsibilities of the Citizen Advisory Committee are to : 1 . Hold meetings open to the public to solicit comments and suggestions for community development needs , goals and projects for funding . 2. Review projects submitted for funding consideration by City departments or other organizations . 3. Recommend to Planning Commission and City Council a Com- munity Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan for the annual application . The Citizens Advisory Committee met in three of the HCD Target Neighborhoods to solicit the views of local residents on neighbor- hood needs . Based on the input received at the Citizens Advisory Committee public meetings , the Committee submitted a recommended CD Program to the Planning Commission and City Council . Public hearings will be held before the Planning Commission and City Council prior to final adoption of the CD Program and Housing Assistance Plan . 8 • 2 .0 FORMULATING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Receiving direction from citizens and staff, the Housing and Community Development Citizen Advisory Committee began its task of formulating a final plan . The components of the fourth year ' s CD program are contained in this section and include : 1 . A statement of general community needs derived from citizen input and staff analysis (EXHIBIT A) ; 2. A statement of long-term objectives derived from citizen input , city staff and previous year ' s applications intended to meet identified community needs (EXHIBIT B ) ; 3 . A statement of more specific short-term objectives (also intended to meet identified community needs ) that can be accomplished in three years (EXHIBIT C ) ; and 4. Community Development Program alternatives to be completed 1 in the fourth year with the City ' s $1 . 290 million entitle- ment (EXHIBITS D, E , ) . This section analyzes projects submitted by City departments , citizens , and other organizations against the requirements of the Act, the needs and objectives statements , citizen input , and timeliness . The alternatives include a recommended program 1 1 9 developed by the Citizens Advisory Committee as well as a listing of other suggested projects that are appropriate for funding with future years ' entitlements . 2 . 1 Statement of Community Needs The Statement of Community Needs presented in Exhibit A represents the heart of the Community Development Program. Based on the Citizen comments and staff analysis , this statement identifies priority needs in the community. The needs statement outlines a general direction for the City to follow in achieving a better tomorrow; and the objectives and projects contained in the Community Development Program are guided by that directive . 2 . 2 Long-Term Objectives Exhibit B sets forth long-term objectives designed to meet the community needs identified in Exhibit A. These objectives rep- resent achievements to be accomplished over the coming years through the Community Development Program and other City activities . In other words , the long-term objectives are major community goals to be pursued . 2 . 3 Short-Term Objectives More specifically , the short-term objectives listed in Exhibit C are designed to make measurable progress towards meeting the City ' s identified needs . They are expected to be accomplished during the next three years of the Housing and Community Development Act. These objectives concern a variety of issues and are intended to define the immediate goals used by the City in formulating its three year plans for this and future HCD program years . 2 . 4 Criteria for Fourth-Year Program Of direct concern , however , is the fourth year program. Projects included here will be funded by the fourth year entitlement of $1 , 290 million and will be initiated on the approval of the City ' s application by HUD . The projects scheduled for the fourth year must address identified community needs and objectives and be consistent with the criteria of the Housing and Community Development Act . That is , they must be directed at preventing or eliminating blight , have a maximum feasible priority for assisting low and moderate income families or meeting urgent community development needs . 2. 5 The Community Development Projects Exhibit D presents the Fourth-Year Community Development Program. These projects reflect the highest ranking of the Citizens Advisory Committee and are highly consistent with HUD criteria , community development objectives and needs and are achievable within the time frame of the Housing and Community Development Act. AfWk OM 10 11 Specifically , the eleven project , $1 . 290 million program recom- mended by the Citizens Advisory Committee is as presented below. • 1 . Continued Funding for Neighborhood Preservation/Rehabilitation Loan Program: This project will provide continued funding for the second year of this program and recommends funding for the fifth and sixth 0, HCD program years . It will provide state operation and financing for approximately 50 loans to low- and moderate-income households . It will also fund a citizen participation program, code inspections and assistance to homeowners for loan applications 0 and planning improvements . ($250,000) . 2. Provision of Smoke Detectors in Target Neighborhoods : This project will fund the provision of approximately 3 ,000 smoke detector devises for households within the HCD Target e Neighborhoods . Households participating in the Neighborhood Preservation Program and other elderly or handicapped households will have a preferrence for receiving these devises . The Fire Department will instruct households in the use of these devises and assistance in their installation . In addition , the Fire Department staff will also offer counseling on emergency escape procedures for these households . ($30 ,500) . 3. Provision of an Emergency Medical Information System: This project will be implemented by the Fire Department and • will provide forms upon which target area residents may describe their medical history and special medical problems . These forms are then stored in vials that are stored in the household ' s refrigerator where emergency personnel may locate them. ($5 ,500 ) . 4. Construction of Cypress/Ash Streets Storm Sewer: This project will fund the construction of a storm sewer project on two streets in an identified HCD Target Neighborhood: Oak View. This sewer will connect to a collector channel and will substantially reduce the flood hazard in this area . ($95 ,000 ) . 5. Special Projects to Benefit the Handicapped : This project will fund the construction of additional wheel chair ramps throughout the City, purchase of specialized traffic signals and communications equipment for the handicapped as well as a study of other needs of the handi- capped . ($40 ,000 ) . • 11 6. Improvements to the Downtown Area : This project is the first of a three year program for the comprehensive revitalization of the Downtown area . This year ' s work will include utility improvements in the first two blocks from Pacific Coast Highway along Main Street , landscaping of the Pacific Coast Highway median at Main Street and a resignalization of the intersection of Main and Pacific Coast Highway for better pedistrian safety and accessability. ($271 ,000 ) . 7 . Outdoor Recreation Improvements at the Oak View Center: This project will fund the construction of outdoor play areas and equipment for small children , landscaping , tables , barbeques , sprinklers , and fencing around the site. ($75 ,000) . 8. Acquisition of Land for a Park Site in Old Town : This project will fund the acquisition of two acres adjacent to an undeveloped park site in the Old Town area. ($200,000) . 9. Provision of Parking at the Newland House : The Newland House is an historical landmark and has been nearly restored to its original condition in the late 1800 ' s . However, before the house may be opened to the public and begin to generate its own revenue , parking must be provided. Therefore , this project will provide paved , landscaped parking for the Newland House . ($25 ,000 ) . 10. Construction of Storm Sewer at Michael Drive : This project will fund the construction of a new storm sewer on Michael Drive and will substantially reduce the flood hazard in this area . ($175 ,000) . 11 . Installation of Traffic Signal at 17th and Orange Streets : This project will fund the purchase and installation of a four-way traffic signal at 17th and Orange Streets adjacent to the Seniors Citizens Center to protect Seniors and children at this intersection . ($47 ,000) . 12 `� , G p • '( -. .....m....w.,.w»,r,,....,.......,...... .,......-. ! .. ...... ........ nma r..,,{ EDNGER f 1 `•;,,t .axixree..».•; :;�....•..w .nr..r.,enw.wwyl�H,aed.<-r,«�.,;;s.irriin�wR WARNER SLAM y.. , C3 10 ...,........ i a ! ELLIS {. \_"4,� ,,p� ww,�..,...o. ..R.•.,...,..,,..„i�..w..o........:................v+..,....,... ..+.:.w...amavawoz:� �awz«n>aw�,c"'°°"wv9 .. GARFIELD 1. Neighborhood Preservation Program i (All Target Areas), . '% \ �,,..,. ... .,..,,.w„ ....................... ... ............{.... ....... ............ I'2. Smoke Detectors ` \ YORKTOWN . (All Target Areas) \ € 9 3. Emergency Medical Information �•.,�` ; (All Target Areas) ADAMS 4. Cypress/Ash Storm Sewer 5. Removal of Architectural Barriers (City Wide) ND >. .................... S IANAPOLIS 6. Main Street Village Improvements { S 7. Oakview Center Recreation Improvements . 8. Old Town Park Acquisition -t I ' 9. Newland House Parking �. `I 7 d r ATLANTA 10. Micheal Drive Storm Sewer ytt ``-.✓�\ 11. Traffic Signal at 17th and OrangeHAMOON s ............ .. BANNING l-" h4 LOCATION OF FOUTH YEAR HOUSING N; & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS census tracts / 1973 special census 13 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY STATEMENT OF NEEDS A-1 Citizen Participation The participation of local residents (especially those from HCD target neighborhoods ) is key to the success of the HCD Program. Continued and expanded efforts to encourage residents to participate in the preparation of each year' s HCD Program are needed , and residents should be encouraged to organize to meet their own needs and to make those needs known to those who act in the decision-making process . Source : Human Resources Council HCD Citizens Advisory Committee A-2 Existing Housing Assistance The City shall continue to participate with the Orange County Housing Authority to provide subsidized housing as one mechanism to assist the approximately 6 ,700 renter households requiring assistance . Additional steps should be taken to encourage greater participation by landlords in the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program, and the City shall continue to monitor the operation of the program to assure that it is responsive to the needs of local residents . Source : Department of Planning and Environmental Resources HCD Citizens Advisory Committee A-3 New Construction Housing Assistance Although the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program has been of great assistance to the City ' s renter households , the availability of rental units for rents that do not exceed the fair market rents under Section 8 is diminishing. Therefore , the construction of new sub- sidized or low- rent units for both families and the elderly is needed. Source : Orange County Housing Authority Citizen Comments AtWk lip 14 • A-4 Housing Rehabilitation • Although much of the City ' s housing stock has been built within the last ten years , there are several older areas that have deteriorated and some newer areas that show early signs of decline. Approximately 1 ,950 units require rehabilitation at this time , and both these units and those showing early signs of decline will need to be improved to • preserve this critical segment of the housing stock to help main- tain housing for low- and moderate-income households . Source : SCAG Community Analysis Report , Robert J . Rodino Assoc. A-5 Public Works Improvements All of the HCD target neighborhoods require at least some public works improvements . Street improvements ; lighting ; curbs , gutters , and sidewalks ; storm sewers ; and fire protection facilities are the most frequent needs . However, some areas also require the removal of architectural barriers for the handicapped or other more specialized improvements for pedestrian mobility and access . Source : Department of Public Works Citizen Comments A-6 Downtown Revitalization The downtown area of Huntington Beach developed early in the 1900 ' s and many of the buildings are now unsightly, do not meet current building codes , and house marginal commercial uses . There are also the attendant problems of parking , pedestrian access , and lack of landscaping and street furniture. A comprehensive and coordinated application of all available resources is necessary to correct these problems . Source : Downtown Redevelopment Plan ; Planning Staff Citizen Comments Downtown Merchants Guild 15 A-7 Provision of Human Service Needs Each of the City ' s HCD target areas is unique by virtue of the characteristics of their respective populations . Because of the diverse nature of the neighborhoods , a wide range of human need services and facilities is required , including day care services , social services , counseling and referral , juvenile diversion , health care , senior citizen services , transportation , housing assistance , and recreation . In target neighborhoods with a community center, these services are coordinated through the center while assisting and en- couraging neighborhood residents to become self-sufficient. Source : First , Second , and Third Year HCD Programs Citizen Comments Human Resources Council Mayor' s Advisory Committee on the Handicapped Council on Aging A-8 Provision/Preservation of Recreation and Open Space To fully improve some neighborhoods , it will be necessary to provide recreational open space and/or preserve significant recreational or open space resources . Therefore , acquisition of land and/or purchase of equipment may be required to ensure that these needs of target neighborhoods are met . Source : First , Second , and Third Year HCD Programs Citizen Comments A-9 Program Administration As the scope of the HCD Program has increased , the need for a greater commitment to program administration has become evident. Program administration includes compensation to employees assigned to the program and the attendant operating expenses for employee benefits , supplies , and capital outlay items . Program staff must prepare each year' s application and conduct citizen meetings and public hearings , as well as oversee the implementation of approved CD projects . Also there is a need for administrative service to conduct the environ- mental review for projects in each year ' s CD Program. AfWk 16 • EXHIBIT B COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY LONG TERM OBJECTIVES B-1 41 1 . Revitalization of the Downtown Area - Subsequent to the adoption of a plan for the old Downtown Area , which is now being prepared , a series of City initiated actions will be necessary to implement the plan. These actions will probably include (dependent upon the adopted plan ) : upgrading of existing or construction of new public facilities , new zoning regulations , code enforcement programs and cooperative efforts between public and private sector interests to foster revitalization . Supports Need (s ) No: A-1 , A-4 , A-5 , A-6 , A-7 • B-2 2. Provision of Community Services and Necessary Related Facilities . to All Residents . Provision of community services and aci ides that are not otherwise available to residents of Huntington Beach , particularly low- and moderate-income families , and the elderly, and the handicapped as well as others in need of such services . Supports Need (s ) No: A-1 , A-5 , A-7 , A-8 B-3 Deterioration - Upgrading program for critical neighborhoods could include : a. Revamp of zoning ordinance to simplify, codify and streamline requirements and particularly , processes . b. Housing code enforcement c. Underwrite , partially or wholly, off-site public improvement in deficient neighborhoods . d . Develop and provide programs relative to housing rehabil - 0 itation , home management , maintenance, budgeting , etc. Supports Need (s ) No : A-1 , A-3 , A-4, A-5 , A-7 , A-8 Aft 17 B-4 4. Impact of Critical Public Works Facilities - a . Improvement of Critical Flood Control and Drainage Facili - ties - Improvement of drainage facilities including upgrading of existing facilities and new construction to bring defic- ient areas to citywide standards . b. Improvement of Critical Water Facilities - Replacement of outdated or worn out water facilities in older portions of Huntington Beach to bring water service up to citywide standards . C. Improvement of Street Lighting Facilities in Critical Areas - Upgrading or new construction of street lighting an areas below the citywide standards . d . Street Improvements - including resurfacing , curbs , gutters and sidewalks . e. Removal of architectural barriers for the handicapped and provision for improved pedestrian mobility and access . Supports Need ( s ) No : A-5 , A-6 B-5 5. Provision of Public Facilities in Key Commercial and Industrial Areas - Public assistance in the development of key commercial and industrial areas by providing , in whole or in part, certain public facilities . Supports Need ( s ) No : A-5 , A-6 , A-8 B-6 6 . Provisions of additional subsidized or low-rent units for low- and moderate- income families , the elderly , and the handicapped. Supports Need (s ) No : A-1 , A-2 , A-3 Aeak 18 • EXHIBIT C • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES C- 1 DOWNTOWN/TOWNLOT CT 993. 02 • 1 . Continued funding for Redevelopment Planning 2 . Institute Code Enforcement Program for commercial buildings and renter- and owner-occupied housing. 3. Initiate rehabilitation loans/grants program 4. Provide self-help rehabilitation training • 5. Provision/improvement of drainage facilities 6. Provision/improvement of water and sewer facilities 7. Improvement/provision of streets , curbs , gutters , sidewalks , and alleys . 8. Improvement/provision of street lights and traffic signals 9. Land acquisition/write-down for senior citizen/low- income housing • 10. Improvements to senior citizens center and T-L-C Program Facility 11 . Provision/improvement of parking facilities 12. Improve fire protection facilities 13. Support neighborhood organization • Supports Need ( s ) No : A-1 , A-3, A-4 , A-5 , A-6 , A-7 • C-2 OLDTOWN CT 993-03 1 . Institute Code Enforcement Program for renter- and owner-occupied housing. 2 . Institute rehabilitation loans/grants programs 3. Provide self-help rehabilitation training 4. Provision/execution of drainage facilities 5. Provision/improvement of water/sewer facilities 6. Provision/improvement of streets , curbs , gutters , and sidewalks 7. Provision of street lights and signals 8. Provision of open space/recreational facility 9 . Support Neighborhood Organization Program Supports Need (s ) No : A- , A-4, A-5 , A-8 Aft 19 C-3 OAK VIEW CT 994. 01 1 . Institute Code Enforcement Program for renter- and owner-occupied housing. 2. Institute rehabilitation loans/grants program 3. Provide self-help rehabilitation training program 4. Provision/ improvement of water and sewer facilities 5. Provision/improvement of streets , curbs , gutters , and sidewalks 6 . Provision of street lights/signals 7. Support neighborhood organization program 8. Institute juvenile diversion program 9 . Institute police rapport program 10. Further the outreach services/facilities for center 11 . Improve recreational facilities at neighborhood center Supports Need (s ) No: A- 1 , A-4 , A-5 , A-7 , A-8 C-4 BUSHARD CT 993. 15 1 . Support Neighborhood Organization Program 2 . Institute Police Rapport Program Supports Need ( s ) No: A-1 , A-7 C-5 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION 1 . Provide parking for the Newland House Supports Need ( s ) No : A- 1 , A-8 C-6 PROJECTS FOR THE HANDICAPPED 1 . Removal of architectural barriers . Supports Need(s ) No : A-1 , A-5 , A-7 Aft I an 20 lip • EXHIBIT D • RECOMMENDED PROJECTS FOR FOURTH YEAR ENTITLEMENT: $1 ,290. 000 • Project HUD Actitity Total Project Other HCD Description Category Cost Funding Allocation 1 . Neighborhood Rehabilitation Preservation Loans $ 700 ,000 $100 ,000 $250,000 2. Smoke Provision of Detectors Public Service 30 ,500 0 30 ,500 3. Emergency Provision of Medical Info Public Service 5,500 0 5 ,500 4. Cypress/Ash Public Works Storm Sewer Improvements 95 ,000 0 95 ,000 5. Removal of Projects for Architectural Elderly & Barriers Handicapped 40 ,000 0 40 ,000 6. Mn St Village Public Works Improvements Improvements 2,242 ,200 0 271 ,000 7. Oak View Public Works Cntr Rec . Improvements Improvements 75 ,000 0 75 ,000 8. Old Town Park Acquisition of Real Property 200 ,000 0 200 ,000 9 . Newland House Historic Parking Preservation 25 ,000 0 25 ,000 10. Michael Dr. Public Works Storm Sewer Improvements 175 ,000 0 175 ,000 11 . Traffic Public Works Signal at 17th & Orange Improvements 47 ,000 0 47 ,000 Program Administration 70 ,000 0 70,000 Uncommitted Funding 0 0 6 ,000 3, 705 ,200 100,000 $1 , 290 ,000 MM lip 21 EXHIBIT E OTHER PROJECTS CONCIDERED FOR FUTURE YEARS ENTITLEMENTS HUD Project Title Activity Category Estimated Cost 1 . 13th St Storm Sewer Public Works $ 400 ,000 2 . Street Lighting Public Works 1 ,400, 000 3. Oak View St Lights Public Works 100 ,000 4. Oak View St Improvements Public Works 300, 000 5 . Senior Citizens Acquisition of Mobile Home Park Real Property 300 ,000 6 . Lake St Fire Station Public Works 600 ,000 7. Computer Aided Medical Dispatch System 9 ,200 8. Oak View Juvenile Division Public Services 52 ,000 9 . Oak View Liaison Person Public Services 15 ,000 Aft 22 1 FIP HOUSING , ASSISTANCE PLAN M t ,m huntington beach planning department r SUMMARY The Housing Assistance Plan is a required portion of the City of Huntington Beach' s application for funds allocated to it under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. A Housing Assistance Plan is an assessment of the City's need for assisted housing for lower income households and its plans for providing housing to meet those needs. It is also an attempt to relate community development ! programs and comprehensive planning to the provision of lower income housing. The Housing Assistance Plan must contain four specific areas of information: • (1) an accurate survey of the condition of the existing housing stock; (2) an assessment of the housing assistance needs of lower income persons now residing or expected to reside in Huntington Beach in the near future; • (3) specification of a realistic annual goal for the number of dwelling units or persons that will be assisted; (4) and identification of the general locations of any proposed assisted housing. • Census and other data indicate that housing in Huntington Beach is generally in very good condition and much of it is owner occupied. Huntington Beach currently has a shortage of 5,142 dwelling units in the lower income price ranges. Many lower income families are paying more than a normal amount of their income for housing. Of • all households in Huntington Beach, 13,082 have incomes below the federally defined lower income level. Approximately 6,500 families fall into the very low income category. Low income senior citizens, handicapped and large families have special difficulties in locating affordable standard housing. • HUD has not yet indicated the general range within which the City' s final Section 8 Housing Assistance Program allocation will be. There has been a delay in the allocation of Section 8 units , and the City recently received a total of 136 Section 8 housing units based on the community' s second year Housing Assistance Plan. In addition, several • other important factors such as the precise role the City wishes to take, the availability of housing sponsors and Huntington Beach's relative needs as viewed by HUD, are not clearly defined at this time. The City' s Housing Assistance strategy has grown in scope over recent years. Approximately 185 senior citizens housing units are planned for construction in Spring, 1978, and SCAG has allocated 100 new family units for Huntington Beach. The City is now implementing the first phase of a four-year neighborhood preservation program and HCD funds 90000 Atak 23 are being used to reduce the cost (through land acquisition) of a privately-sponsored project to construct approximately 200 senior citizen dwelling units. Aft Ma 24 r 1 .0 INTRODUCTION The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 imposes several new housing responsibilities on local governments . These include ; All new federally assisted housing must be provided in conformance with a local housing assistance plan. A local housing assistance plan must be included as part of any development program funded under Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. . Each local recipient of federal planning assistance under Title IV of the Act is required to carry out a comprehensive planning program that includes a "housing element. " The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 is directed towards relating community development activities and the comprehensive plan- ing process to the provision of housing assistance for low- and moderate-income families . The housing assistance plan is intended to place increased emphasis on the provision of local housing services , placing program control and implementation directly with local governments resulting in benefits of increased control over the location and nature of housing assistance provided , and parameters of marketing areas served. AMN 25 1 . 1 Contents of the Housing Assistance Plan The Housing Assistance Plan must contain information addressing four required areas of consideration. The housing assistance plan must accurately survey the condition of the existing housing stock . The plan must specify the number of housing units currently existing ; the number of units in standard , substandard and deteriorated condition ; the number of vacant and occupied units and the amount of substandard units suitable for rehabilitation . The housing assistance plan must contain an assessment of the housing assistance needs of lower income persons now residing in Huntington Beach or expected to reside in the City in the near future . The survey of housing assistance needs must include special consideration for minority populations , women , elderly and handicapped persons , displaced persons , and large families . The housing assistance plan must specify a realistic annual goal for the number of dwelling units or persons to be assisted . This goal must include the mix of new, existing , and rehabilitated dwelling units , and the size and nature of projects and assistance best suited to the needs of lower income families residing in the community. The housing assistance plan must also identify the general loca- tions of proposed assisted housing , with the objectives of further- ing revitalization of the community , promoting greater choices of housing opportunity , avoiding undue concentrations of lower income persons and assuring the availability of adequate public facilities and services for such housing. 1 . 2 Assisted Housing Funding The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 , in addition to allocating funds directly to cities for "community development" activities , appropriated funds under several programs specifically addressing housing assistance. The Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development has or will be allocating portions of these housing assistance funds to HUD and FHA Insuring Area offices . This pool of housing assistance funds will be allocated to local communities based on either a formula (fair share) allocation , an approved housing assistance plan , or a combination of both . Private, non-profit , or public lower income housing developers or sponsors may then submit proposals for either new , existing , or rehabilitated housing projects to the HUD area office. HUD or FHA will approve or reject a project requesting federal funds based on the annual housing assistance plan submitted by Huntington Beach and approved by HUD. In P 26 • All or part of Huntington Beach ' s "community development" allocation may also be used to supplement federal housing assistance funds . • The manner in which the community development allocation is used is largely determined by the local government , acting within the para- meters established by the Act. • • • • • • • 27 2. 0 CONDITION OF THE HOUSING STOCK Housing in Huntington Beach can be categorized as being largely owner occupied and in good condition. This can be attributed to the large number of single family housing tracts that have been constructed and to the fact that the majority of all housing is less than fifteen years old. However, according to the Southern California Association of Governments' revised Regional Housing Allocation Model approximately 347 substandard units exist ' in Huntington Beach and an additional 1, 023 units are suitable for re- habilitation. Adak MEOW am 28 HP • • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN SURVEY OF HOUSING CONDITIONS , 1978 • OCCUPANCY STATUS NUMBER OF YEAR ROUND UNITS AND CONDITION OF OWNER RENTER HOUSING UNITS TOTAL OCCUPIED OCCUPIED • Occupied Units (Total) 54 ,200 35,935 18 ,765 Substandard 324 121 203 All Other 53, 876 35 , 814 18 ,062 • Vacant Units (Total) 1, 884 912 972 Substandard 23 2 21 • All Other 1, 861 910 951 Total Occupied and Vacant Units 56, 084 36, 847 19, 737 • SOURCE: 1977 Figures for SCAG, based on Regional Housing Allocation Model. • • Table 2-1 29 CITY OF HU,"I I I NGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN SUBSTANDARi HOUSING UNITS SUITABLE FOR KEHABILITATION 1973 OCCUPA14CY STATUS AND OWNER RENTER CONDITION OF HOUSING UNITS TOTAL OCCUPIED OCCUPIED ALL SUBSTANDARD UNITS 347 123 224 REHABILITATABLE OCCUPIED UNITS 0112 251 691 VACANT UNITS 87 7 74 TOTAL SUITABLE FOR REHABILITATION 1029 258 765 SOURCE : SCAG, REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL, DECEMBER 1977, Table 2-2 30 3 . 0 HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS The requirement in the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 that the housing assistance plan contain an assessment of the housing assistance needs of lower income households residing in Huntington Beach is an effort to assure that the local government carefully investigate the demand side of the housing problem. It is necessary to look at the components of housing demand in order to understand current conditions and make projections concerning future demand. The identified existing and future need must be known if Huntington Beach is to establish realistic housing assistance goals. 3 . 1 Sound Housing/Rent Gap Analysis • The basic technique for determining total housing assistance needs is the comparison of existing supply and existing demand for housing. To conduct a sound housing/rent gap analysis, it is necessary to sort through the housing supply, grouping housing units into appro- priate rent categories. Households then must be grouped into comparable rent paying or home buying ability categories. The dif- ference between the available supply and the demand in a particular rent paying/home buying ability range indicates the need for housing 31 Housing Supply Demand Distribution 14,623 12,878 KEY 11,062 10,903 HOUSING HOUSING DEMAND SUPPLY 8,666 (Includes (Sound or household plus Rehabitable) vacancy 6,951 allowance) 6,644 5,712 4,390 2,040 1,741 1,500 163 Monthly Rent < S75 75-164 165-229 230-279 280-364 365-499 > 500 Capability Home 5,000 14,000 20,000 27,000 37,000 Purchase <S5,000 13 999 19 ggg 26,999 36,999 59,999 60,000 Capability Annual <$3,000 3,000 7,000 12,000 16,000 22,000 >36,000 Income 6,999 11,999 15,999 21,999 35,999 SOURCE: Scag Regional Housing Allocation Model, December 1976 'all t � T c-.'.��P- 2-3 in that price range . Table 2-3 displays housing supply and demand in Huntington Beach. Households in income categories above $12 , 000 (800 of the regionwide $15 , 000 median income) are not eligible for housing assistance except for large families in the $12 , 000 to $15, 999 income category. If there are an insufficient number of housing units in the City with four bedrooms and rents of $280 a month or less ($27 , 000 or less for housing value) many large families in the $12 , 000 to $15, 999 income categories will need assistance. Since the median value of 3 or more bedroom units in Huntington Beach is high (rent - $332, house - $48 , 035) the number of 4 bedroom units valued appropriately for the aforementioned can be assumed to be inadequate. Therefore , housing shortage in Huntington Beach is the difference between the supply and demandin the rent paying/home i buying ability ranges with less than $12 , 000 incomes and the number of large families with incomes of $12 , 000 to $15, 000. The total need in Huntington Beach based on the described criteria is 5, 142 units according to the latest available data and including the need for additional families which may reasonably be expected to reside in the community . The house values and rents matched up to each income category are based on the sliding scale of ability to pay starting at 30 percent of gross income in the lowest category, going down to 16 percent in the highest category. 3. 2 Impacted Groups The Federal Government has defined lower income households as those whose total family income is less than eighty per- cent of the median income of the area for a family of the same size. According to 1977 Southern California Association of Governments ' data, there are approximately 13, 082 lower income households . The federal Government has also defined those households whose total family income is less than fifty percent of the median in- come of the area as very low income families . Of the aforementioned lower income families, approximately 6 , 500 households meet the very low income criteria. Several groups of households constitute a significant portion of these lower and very low income households. . Senior Citizens : 1 , 515 elderly households are estimated to have incomes below the lower income level. Approximately 858 of these ! elderly households fall into the very low income category. The large number of lower income senior, citizens is especially sig- nificant when it is pointed out that their earned incomes usually decline with age, and their actual incomes are eroded as inflation and housing costs increase. Significant concentrations of Senior Citizens exist in three areas of the City. . Large Families : 4 , 729 families with five or more persons are estimated to have incomes below the lower income level. Approxi- 33 mately 78 percent of these lower income families have incomes at or below the very low income level. Many of these families are living in overcrowded conditions. Handicapped Persons: Huntington Beach has one of the largest concentrations of handicapped and disabled persons in Orange County. These persons require specially designed housing that is not available and face many of the same income and housing problems as the elderly. Approximately 920 low income handicapped house- holds have been identified of which 409 live in one or two person households. 3 . 3 Anticipated Future Assisted Housing Needs A three year Housing Assistance Program is required for the 1977 application. Therefore, anticipated increases of lower income households must be considered. Also, in cooperation with other cities in the region , a fair share allocation of lower income groups to each City should be made so that said groups will be dispersed throughout the region rather than concentrated in limited areas. . Fair Share Allocation - According to SCAG estimates , Huntington Beach should increase projected housing assistance needs for the third year goal by 1 , 869 units. The units should be distributed in the following manner : 783 units in the $ 0 - $ 3, 000 income range 951 units in the $ 3 , 000 - $ 7 , 000 income range 135 units in the $ 7 , 000 - $12 , 000 income range Future needs through normal growth - By 1978 there will be approxi- mately 16 , 036 lower income households of which 1, 402 will be large families, 2 , 756 will be 65 and over households , and 1, 068 will be handicapped households. Assuming that the present low cost housing stock does not deteriorate and that no new housing is constructed in the low cost range (rent less than $230, house value less than $20 , 000) , a total of 8 , 625 low cost units will be available . This would indicate a need for assisted housing of 7 , 411 units . When fair share allocations and normal growth are considered together, a three year need for Huntington Beach is 9 , 485 assisted units. `E 34 CITY OF HU14T I`JGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAIN SENIOR CITIZENS (65 OR ovER) , 1977 _ INCOME NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS* LESS THAN $3,000 127 $3,000 - $6,999 731 i $7, 000 - $11,999 657 LOWER INCOME LEVEL $12,000 - $15,999 453 $16,000 - $21,999 304 $22,000 - $35,999 110 $36,000 OR MORE 25 TOTAL 2,393 #SOURCE: SCAG REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL, DECEMBER 1976. Table 2-4 r i•' is h'•. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN LARGE FAMILIES (FIVE OR 114BE_PERSONS) 1977 INCOME NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS _ LESS THAN $3, 000 174 $3,000 - $6, 999 3512 $7, 000 - $11, 999 1043 $12, 000 - $15,999 2399 LOWER INCOME LEVEL $16, 000 - $21,999 4241 $22, 000 - $35, 999 2860 $36,000 OR MORE 632 TOTAL 14,861 SOURCE : SCAG REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL, DECEMBER 1976 Table 2-5 :.I 4. 0 SPECIFIED REALISTIC ANNUAL GOAL FOR ASSISTED HOUSING The Housing Assistance Plan must specify a realistic annual goal for the number of dwelling units to be assisted, using Federal or other available housing assistance resources , taking into consid- eration the housing conditions and needs described in the first two sections of the plan. Goals must separately identify the proportion . of new, rehabilitated, and existing dwelling untis , and the sizes and types of dwelling units that need to be assisted, taking into account the kinds of assistance best suited to the needs of lower income persons in Huntington Beach. There must be a one-year goal describing planned numbers of assisted Q units. The year should coincide with the first year program described elsewhere in the Community ,Development Block Grant appli- cation. To provide a longer term framework for the annual goal, applicants are required to prepare the one-year goal within the context of a three year planning period which coincides with the three-year plan prescribed in the application. Goals for new, rehabilitated, and existing units must be consistent with the findings regarding the availability of vacant existing 37 units and of units suitable for rehabilitation. Goals should re- flect the maximum feasible use of the existing housing stock in accordance with generally known data, taking into consideration that HUD priorities for use of the Section 8 Housing Assistance Program emphasize the use of existing housing. The distribution of assis- tance between new and rehabilitated units should be made taking into consideration the objectives of: curtailment of housing deteriora- tion; promotion of neighborhood stability; minimizing detrimental environmental impact; avoidance of undue concentrations of low income and minority group persons; and economic feasibility. Goals for using Section 8 Lower Income Housing Assistance payment must be consistent with the amount of such resources currently available. Generally, it is reasonable to express the housing assistance goals for one year as 10 - 20 percent of total need for the remaining families. once the goal has been determined in terms of the number of units to be requested, the method of assistance must be determined. The methodology which the City has adopted for achieving the housing assistance unit goals is presented in the following sections. 1. Housing Assistance Plan Implementation Strategy This strategy presents a realistic program directed towards realizing the optimum fulfillment of the Housing Assistance Plan and providing housing assistance to the maximum number of families. This program attempts to fully utilize the resources available to the City, and to structure a compre- hensive housing assistance program. The major facets of this strategy are as follows. A. Current Year and Three-Year Housing Assistance Goals Goals for current year and projected three year housing assistance provide a framework and quantitive direction for the City' s housing assistance program. The City of Huntington Beach has adopted these goals , and has structured assistance efforts to provide the maximum fulfillment of these stated objectives. The Citizens Advisory Committee endorsed the "current year goals" and "three year goals" on November 4 , 1977 . Specific project objectives are directed towards fulfilling these goals and meeting the needs of the community. B. Housing Assistance Projects Based on the quantitative needs presented in the community' s stated goals , field surveys and analysis , staff input, and citizen input as articulated through the Citizens Advisory Committee , the following programatic strategy has been formulated as a means of implementing the City' s Housing Assistance Program. ACM& 38 (1) Section 8 : New Construction for Large Families * SCAG has recently given Huntington Beach its highest ranking for the construction of family housing in Orange County. This priority ranking allows for the new construction of approximately 100 large-family units in the community. This project is presently pending the release of funds from HUD 's central office in Washington. (2) Section 8 : New Construction for the Elderly HUD granted the City of Huntington Beach preapproval for a site on which to construct Section 8 housing for low-income seniors . Preapproval was granted in October 1976 , and in July, 1977 , the HUD published a Notice of Funding Availability. Subsequently, the firm of Doty and Associates was selected by HUD for the con- struction of 185 one-bedroom housing units for low- income seniors . The EIR for this report is presently being formulated, and the Planning Commission will conside the conditional use permit for this project in February, 1978 . Construction is scheduled to begin in Spring, 1978 . (3) Private New Construction of Elderly Housing Huntington Beach is now investigating the feasibility of constructing a housing development on the Old Civic Center site in the downtown area. The project will involve the construction of approximately 200 elderly housing units on a publically owned site which has direct access to a wide range of social , educational and recreational services . The Citizens Advisory Committee recently endorsed the proposed use of the site, and request for a proposal is now being prepared . The staff is presently investigating the use of third year HCD funds to underwrite land improvement on a site providing for the construction of 200 Section 8 units to be rented within Section 8 fair market unit limits for leased housing. (4) Housing Rehabilitation Program The City' s four-year neighborhood preservation and housing rehabilitation program will be implemented in its first phase during the current program year. This program provides HCD funds for rehabilitation loans and assistance to low to moderate income target neigh- borhoods. This project will also work to alleviate the r physical deterioration of certain blighted areas of the City. ACIML 39 o CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN HOUSING UNIT ALLOCATIONS, 197I i Assisted Assistedl % of To- Housing Unit Housing Unit # of Lower tal Lower Need less Need including Income Income Expected to Expected to 1978 Impacted Groups Households Households Reside Reside Goal i Elderly and 1, 515 11 . 59 533 (1) 554 Handicapped 425 Large 4 , 729 36 . 14 1725 (102) 1827 Family 275 Other 6, 838 52 . 27 2497 (264) 2761 450 Families Total 13, 082 100% 4775 5142 1150 1. 5 , 933 assisted housing units are needed. Each impacted group is assigned a need based on its percentage of total lower income households . Source: SCAG Regional Housing Allocation Model, December 1976 Huntington Beach Planning Department Table 2-6 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN THREE YEAR HOUSING UNIT ALLOCATIONS %of Total Additional Modified Three Lower Income Three Year Fair Share Three Year Total Year Households Assisted Allocation Assisted Three Percent Goal Needing Housing Housing of Assisted Housing Multi- Year Assign- with Dis- Impacted Groups Assistancel Need2 Housing2 Need3 plier4 Goal ment5 trib,stion Elderly and 11.3% 860 211 1071 - - 23.9 575 Handicapped ' '• ¢ :Large Family 29.3 2231 547 2778 - - 22.1 540 Other Families _ 59.4 4525 1111 5636 54.0 1070 100% 7616 1869 9485 - 1985 100% 2185 1. 1977 Housing Assistance Plan 2. Based on SCAG Regional Housing Allocation Model, December 1976 3. Total of Three Year Assisted Housing Need and Additional Fair Share Allocation of Assisted Housing 4. The multiplier is based on a ten year horizon for eradicating housing need, but modified to allow a continuing increase in families needing aid and therefore an ever extending horizon 5. As is allowable under HUD criteria and based on said criteria, "Percent Assigned" for Large Family has been reduced from the actual percentage of households needing housing assistance. Table 2-7 5. 0 LOCATION OF ASSISTED HOUSING UNITS As mentioned earlier, the housing assistance plan must indicate the general locations of proposed housing for lower income persons. These locations must be selected with the objective of : . furthering community revitalization, . promoting increased housing choices for lower income persons and avoiding undue concentrations of assisted housing; . assuring the availability of public facilities and services adequate to serve proposed housing projects. Figure 2-1 displays the census tracts deemed most appropriate for the location of assisted housing units and community development projects . The following Figures 2-2 through 2-6 display the factors considered in making this selection including : percentage of lower income households, percentage of minority households vacancy rates, income of elderly households, concentration of handicapped persons, concen- tration of very low income families . wa 42 996. 2 ,4.65 � 996. 03 , 1.69 U1.48 M,AUD[N ' 1.65 997 . 02 996.14]91 .04 . 0 0 97 . 03 .,'' ,;. .......,i;> 994. 8 994 - 96 »«. . 3.77 1.45 994 5 4.49 992 . 11 • 94.0 4 7� 9 9 4 . 01 2.52 8,15 ' 1.57 `;'>'> 4.09 3.68 amp 994.02 992.11 994.0 ,ALM" sin 992. 4 992.16 992.132. 4.55 1.58woxyowN .;.: i....i ASMMS .14 ... .. ......... :.:'.'...:....;.:. .;.;... ;. ;:;.:. 992.18 99 17 11.96 1.45 lgANA10lK 4 fe�:•:.•.:•' AnANTA 9 43 992.21 5 1 2. '< '::G.6 7 2.10 NAMIION Figure 2_1 °�. gZ. VACANCY RATES (% OF ALL .HOUSING UNITS) census tracts / 1973 specia I census 43 996.02 97.02 iK 996.04 94 4 6 AL IA1Xy1/ . rr 996.03 996.05 y 997.03 III 1 111 994.081 !994.06 ' ,994.01 995.01 1 994.07.!1 994.05 3 I� 992.11 w.cr� 994.09 ro 994.04 994.02 SLUyq rn UUBW 994.03 aurK�n f 992.14 993.01 992.13 64 #J{ '1glf TpW11 992.15 992.16 ON992.19 992.18 N wrANAran 251 ! rn rn ` ATIANIA Number of Households `' ` ! ! 992.20 NAMITON { 992.21 g1NNW0 Figure 2-2 K({�r��•, tt CONCENTRATION OF FAMILIES WITH 65 ¢ HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD t'_ AND LESS THAN $5,000 INCOME census tracts / p census 1973 special s u 44 r IT 4 �{' 996.02 997.02 "A g� • 996.03 996.04MfAIX[N 996.05 997.031 MANGO 994.08 994.06 ! � 995.01 Fd ,� 994.01I 994.0T fi l�If l '�• 1999.05j ' 41 Il;l!f� 992.11 ` 994.09 � N 0 994.02 St ATM q. N Ol � 1ALIM 994.03 ails OAB{NlD r 992.14' 7 ' 1 993.01 992.13 1 JL" 992.15 992.16 t. ADAMS I ' 992.19 992.18 WANANANX5 rn I AilAN1A O Number of Households � 992.20 NAMITON 992.21 BANNINO �,"I-, Figure 2-3 X0kg4ay tlwx ` go- CONCENTRATION OF FAMILIFS WITH 65 + HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD AND LESS THAN $10,000 INCOME p census tracts / 1973 special census r 45 4 996.02 996.03 997.02 q � ��M.lArwm333 y 996.05 996.04 997.03 IUHOfR 9y4.4.or 994.06 995.01 86 � 130 � 7, " 1994.0 : 9 1!4 f 81 92.11 �94.01�1 �! 994.09 j '% ►I�j !1 �i` f I� /ii. , 79 85 I�!i90 uN� l��t�i!, :!i� ff� 994.04 }�1fF'(994.0214j 992.12 I n UAW 994.03 e„1 GARIULP 11992.116 E1��I 993.01 992.13 log, IOfI(IOW N 111 �N AWM7 n ' 9 I � 9'0 992.19 992.18 rn NO,ANA►OIS Concentratior of Ambulatory 75 Handicapped and Handicapped AILANIA Receiving Aid to the Disabled 993.03 p Number of Ambulatory Handicapped 992.20 11AML7ON 992.21 IANNINO Figure 2-4 =s CONCENTRATIONS OF HANDICAPPED PERSONS census tracts / 1973 special census 46 f • 996.02 997.02 .ow 996.03 1996-04 :996.05 997.03 994.0f3 994.06 ®aou 995.01 994.01 NIa 994.05 992.11 994.07 � ! N �— 994.09 II 3 4 i 2 G� ,lA7FA S 9 994.03 e„s auF*w 993.01 992.14 992.16 992.13 pm TOW„ 992.15 993.02 R521' i 584 992.19 992.1E MANA►WE % 4},9 4 ARANIA ti� 7 992.20 dt NAwroN 992.21 BANN-NO Figure 2-5 CENSUS TRACTS WITH HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF VERY LOW INCOME FAMILIES (Over 20% of Household) census tracts / 1973 special census 47 i • • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW s huntington beach planning department r • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1 . 0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Housing and Community Development Program is funded by the Federal Government under the authority of the Housing and Community Develop- ment Act of 1974. In Huntington Beach several long-term objectives have been formulated , providing a programatic framework and direction for projects receiving funding under the HCD Act . These objectives provide an overall orientation for specific projects funded under the Fourth year entitlement of $1 . 29 million . The environmental assessment is an evaluation of program objectives and an analysis of the environmental impacts likely to be produced through the implementation of these objectives . The analysis of long- term objectives are as follows : Revitalization of the Downtown Area - Subsequent to the adoption of a plan for the old Downtown Area , which is now being prepared , a series of City initiated actions will be necessary to implement the plan. These actions will probably include (dependent upon the adopted plan ) : Upgrading of existing or construction of new public facilities , new zoning regulations , code enforcement programs and cooperative efforts between public and private sector interests to foster revitalization . Adft 48 111 Provision of Community Services and Necessary Related Facilities to 11 Resi ents . Provision of community services and facilities that are not otherwise available to residents of Huntington Beach , par- ticularly low- and moderate- income families , the elderly , and the handicapped as well as others in need of such services . Projects to upgrade Neighborhoods with Indications of Blight and Deterioration - Upgrading program for critical neighborhoods could inclu e : a . Revamp of zoning ordinance to simplify , codify and streamline requirements and particularly , processes . b . Housing code enforcement. C . Underwrite , partially or wholly , off-site public improvements in deficient neighborhoods . d. Develop and provide programs relative to housing rehabili - tation , home management, maintenance , budgeting , etc . Impact of Critical Public Works Facilities - a . Improvement of Critical Flood Control and Drainage Facilities- Improvement of drainage facilities including upgrading of existing facilities and new construction to bring deficient areas to citywide standards . b . Improvement of Critical Water Facilities - Replacement of out- �ated or worn out water facilities in older portions of Huntington Beach to bring water service up to citywide stan- dards . C . Improvement of Street Lighting Facilities in Critical Areas - Upgrading or new construction of street lighting in areas below the citywide standards . d. Street Improvements - including resurfacing , curbs , gutters and sidewalks . e . Removal of architectural barriers for the handicapped and provision for improved pedestrian mobility and access . Provision of Public Facilities in Key Commercial and Industrial Areas - Public assistance in the development of key commercial and industrial areas by providing , in whole or in part , certain public facilities . Provisions of additional subsidized or low-rent units for low- and moderate- income families , the elderly , and the handicapped. .r. �. 49 • • 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND IMPACT The proposed program will be implemented in the City of Huntington Beach , an urban area contained within the Los Angeles Metropolitan region . As a result of the metropolitan nature of the community and the surrounding region , the city is essentially urban in character. A comparative analysis of the program and existing/projected land uses indicate no adverse environmental impacts resulting from program implementation . Projects contained within this program proposal gen- erally have a beneficial impact on the environment , working to improve ! the range and quality of community services and facilities . 1 . Land Use/Demographic Impacts The program generally has no impacts in the area other than positive impacts effected by improvement projects such as the . revitalization of the Downtown area and the rehabilitation of blighted neighborhoods . The proposed development of recreation and community center facilities will also positively affect land use configurations . 2 . Topography and Geology Program proposals will have no significant impact on topography or geologic features . Adft F11 50 3. Water Resources The project area contains a large portion of the Santa Ana River flood basin , and much of this area is subject to periodic regional flood hazards . Potential flood hazards and the extent of the Santa Ana flood plain are environmental concerns which are evalu- ated in relation to all specific project proposals . The program itself has little direct impact on the quality of water resources other than projects directed towards improving the stability of the water table , and improvements to flood-control devices . 4. Air Resources The City of Huntington Beach is located within the South Coast Air Basin , and like other coastal cities experiences considerably less air pollution then inland communities . The program itself will have no identifiable impact on the quality of air resources . 5 . Biological Resources Implementation of the project proposal will not result in any ad- verse impact of biological resources or natural habitats . 6. Human Interest Resources Archaeological sites exist within the program area and have been located for the most part. Each specific project must be evalu- ated as to its possible effects on human interest resources , however , no significant impacts are expected . 7. Municipal Services and Utilities Specific facets of the program proposal , especially physical improvement projects and the expansion or construction of com- munity facilities , will generally result in incremental increases in demands on service systems and other municipal services . Some projects incorporating conservation oriented design features , may result in positive impacts in this area. All individual projects are evaluated in terms of their impact on services and utilities and the ability of existing systems to accommodate project proposals . 8. Economics Program implementation will result in positive impacts on the economic position of the community. Specific project proposals will result in increased employment in the short-range , while long-term impacts of increased economic diversification , broader employment opportunities , and the stabilization and revitali - zation of declining neighborhoods should result from program implementation . Aft � Ilip 51 9 . Traffic/Circulation Circulation will be positively effected by several facets of the ! proposed program. While specific projects may result in incre- mental increases in traffic trips , the overall effect will be one of increasing personal mobility and improving the functioning at the overall transportation system. 10. Acoustical Quality ! The program will have no identifiable impact on community noise levels , other than short-term impacts generated through the implementation of physical improvement projects . • f 52 i APPENDICES r f r FEDERAL APPLICATION huntington beach planning department -pp-69 OMB No. 63—R1471 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 1. STATE CLEARINGHOUSE IDENTIFIER URBAN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE a. APPLICANT'S APPLICATION NO. B-78-MC-06-0506 3. FEDERAL GRANTOR AGENCY 4. APPLICANT NAME Department of Housing and Urban Development City of Huntington Beach • AREA OR REGIONAL OFFICE STREET ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 2000 Plain Street Los Angeles Area Office P.O. Box 190 STREET ADDRESS - P.O. BOX CITY COUNTY • 2500 Wilshire Boulevard Huntington Beach Orange CITY STATE ZIP CODE STATE ZIP CODE Los Angeles California 90057 California 92648 5. DESCRIPTIVE NAME OF THE PROJECT Community Development Block Grant Program Entitlement 6. FEDERAL CATALOG No. 7. FEDERAL FUNDING REQUESTED 14. 218 $ 1,290, 000 S. GRANTEE TYPE ❑ STATE, ❑ COUNTY, 13 CITY, ❑ OTHER (Spedfy) 9. TYPE OF APPLICATION REQUEST M NEW GRANT, ❑ CONTINUATION, ❑ SUPPLEMENT. ❑ OTHER CHANGES (SpWi y) 10. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE N GRANT, [J LOAN, ❑ OTHER (Speelfy) 11. POPULATION DIRECTLY BENEFITING FROM THE PROJECT 13. LENGTH OF PROJECT 115,960 12 months 12. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 14. BEGINNING DATE S. 34, 38, 40 July 1978 b. 34, 40 25. DATE OF APPLICATION 16. THE APPLICANT CERTIFIES THAT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THE DATA IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, AND THAT HE WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF HE RECEIVES THE GRANT. TYPED NAME TITLE Floyd G. Belsito Cit Administrator TELEPHON! NUIMSER SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AM hwmbw am. 714 536-5201 - RM FEOERAL USE ONLY EDITION OF 10.74 IS OBSOLETE HUD-Me Ut-M 53 ' 1.NAME OF APPLICANT 2.APPLICATION NO. 3.0 0 R I G I N A L DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT City of Huntington -78-MC-06-0506 :.-;AMENDMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Beach ENTITLEMENT APPLICANTS ONLY 4.PROGRAM YEAR: FROMJul 78TO: June 1979 CENSUS ESTIMATED COST ($000) RELATED TRACT/ ENVIRONMENTAL RELATED BLOCK GRANT FUNDS OTHER FUNDS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION SHORT- ENUMER- REVIEW BUDGET TEROBJECTIVE ATION STATUS ITEM LINE PROGRAM SUBSEQUENT TOTAL AMOUNT SOURCE DISTRICT YEAR YEAR (1) (2) 0) (4) (5) /6/ (7) (8) (9) (10) Neighborhood Preservation/ C-1 993.02 Assessment 5 250,000 200,000 450,000 0 0 Rehabilitation Loans Program C-2 993.03 C-3 994.02 Provision of Smoke Detection C-1 993.02 Assessment 9 30,500 0 30,500 0 - Devices C-2 993.03 C-3 993.02 Emergency Medical Information C-1 993.02 Assessment 9 5,500 0 5,500 0 - System C-2 993.03 C-3 994.02 992.15 Cypress/Ash Streets Storm C-3 994.02 Assessment 2 95,000 0 95,000 0 - Sewer Construction Removal of Architectural Barriers C-6 City- Assessment 6 40,000 0 40,000 0 - for Elderly and Handicapped wide Main St. Village Improvanents C-1 993.02 Assessment 2 271,000 931,900 1,202,900 0 - Construction Oakview Recreation Improvements C-3 994.02 Assessment 2 75,000 0 75,000 0 - Acquisition of Old Tbwn Park Site C-2 993.03. Assessment 1 200,000 0 200,000 0 - Newland House Parking Construction C-5 992.13 Assessment 2 25,000 0 25,000 0 - Michael Dr. Storm Sewer Constructiom C-3 992.12 Assessment 2 175,000 0 175,000 0 - GRAND TOTAL tiVD-7015.1 (11-75) 1.NAME OF APPLICANT 72.APPLICATION No. 3.T-�AMENDMENTnORIGINAL " DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT B-78-MC-06-0506 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM City of Huntington .ENTITLEMENT APPLICANTS ONLY Beach (4.PROGRAM YEAR: FROM: July Igo: June 1979 CENSUS ESTIMATED COST (5000) RELATED TRACT/ RELATED SHORT- ENVIRONMENTAL BUDGET BLOCK GRANT FUNDS OTHER FUNDS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ENUMER- REVIEW OBJECTIVE DISTRICT TERM ATION STATUS ITEMLINE PROGRAM SUBSEQUENT YEAR YEAR TOTAL AMOUNT SOURCE rl) (2) (3) r4J (5) r6) (7) rs) (9) N 0) Traffic Signal at 17th & Orange C-1 993.02 Assessment 2 47,000 0 47,000 0 - Program Administration - - - - 70,000 80,000 150,000 0 - Uncarmitted Local Option - 6,000 Unknown 6,000 0 - GRAND TOTAL F0,000 Pll,9O $2r501,90O = 0 � HUD-7015.1 (11-75) Li Ul 'U S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT A, ORIGINAL B. APPLICATION NO. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET ❑ AMENOMEN B-78-MC-06-0506 C. NAME. OF APPLICANT D. PROGRAM YEAR City of Huntington Beach FROM: July 1978 TO: June 1979 LINE E. PROGRAM ACTIVITY AMOUNT toll HUD NO. USE ONLY 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 20 0 2. PUBLIC WORKS,FACILITIES,SITE IMPROVEMENTS 688, 000 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT 4. CLEARANCE,DEMOLITION, REHABILITATION 5 REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 250 ,000 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 40,000 7, PAYMENTS FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME 8. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC;SERVICES 36 ,000 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES 11. COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL/NDP PROJECTS 12, RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13, I PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT 14 ADMINISTRATION 70 , 000 15. CONTINUATION OF MODEL CITIES ACTIVITIES 16. SUBTOTAL (Sum of Lines I thru 15) 1, 284, 000 17 CONTINGENCIES AND/OR UNSPECIFIED LOCAL OPTION ACTIVITIES (Not to exceed 10%of line 161 6 ,000 18 TOTAL PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS (Sum of Lines 16end 17) 1, 290, 000 LINE F.RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS NO. 1. ENTITLEMENT OR DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT1,290,000 2. LESS DEDUCTIONS 0 ����?ills 3� s s 7 i` *r 3 ENTITLEMENT/DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES (Line 1 minus 2) 1,290,000 4. PROGRAM INCOME 5. SURPLUS FROM URBAN RENEWAL/NOP SETTLEMENT 6. LOAN PROCEEDS 7. REP4ROGRAMMEO UNOBLIGATED FUNDS FROM PRIOR PROGRAM YEAR S. TOTAL RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS ISumofLines3.7) 1, 290, 000 1 ❑Check box if costs include indirect costs which require approval oja cast allocation plan as required by Federal Management Circular 74-4. EDITION OF 10-74 IS OBSOLETE HUD-7015.5 111.75) �, 56 • �........ ...... f a.............._..__.. NFL p4 i . 44 ...........j....... ....... sum 010' .. is ._._ .. .. . _. . .... 1. Neighborhood Preservation Program \ f = { t f (All Target Areas) 1 2. Smoke Detectors 1 _....,�...r. ................. ................. __.........{.................. ................. iwrcrowN (All Target Areas) 09 3. Emergency Medical Information (All Target Areas) 4. Cypress/Ash Storm Sewer Q8 S. Removal of Architectural Barriers \ (city model `• '...... . '............. .._..___- fWMANAMS 6. Main Street Village Improvements . 7. Oakview Center Recreation Improvements e� 8. Old Town Park Acquisition 9. Newland House Parking - --I AnANU 10. Michael Drive Storm Sewer 11. Traffic Signal at 17th and Orange 4 NAWTON f � . , LOCATION OF FOUTH YEAR HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS census tracts / 1973 special census 57 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (STATEMENT Of NEEDS) 1 NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION NUMBER 3. L ORIGINAL -78-MC-06-0506 AMENDMENT 4. PROGRAM YEAR (EnNd&"Wt Applrcantr Only) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FROM: Ju 1 1978 TO: J A=1 Citizen Participation The participation of local residents (especially those from HCD target neighborhoods) is key to the success of the HCD Program. Continued . and expanded efforts to encourage residents to participate in the preparation of each year' s HCD Program are needed, and residents should be encouraged to organize to meet their own needs and to make those needs known to those who act in the decision-making process. Source: Human Resources Council HCD Citizens Advisory Committee Data Source. A-2 Existing Housing Assistance The City shall continue to participate with the Orange County Housing Authority to provide subsidized housing as one mechanism to assist the approximately 6, 700 renter households requiring assistance. Additional steps should be taken to encourage greater participation by landlords in the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program, and the City shall continue to monitor the operation of the program to assure that it is i responsive to the needs of local residents. Source: Department of Planning and Environmental Resources HCD Citizens Advisory Committee I Data Source: A•-3 New Construction Housing Assistance ~� Although the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program has been of , great assistance to the City' s renter households, the availability of rental units for rents that do not exceed the fair market rents under Section 8 is diminishing. Therefore, the construction of new sub- sidized or low-rent units for both families and the elderly is needed. Source: Orange County Housing Authority Citizen Comments i Data Source: Pape_ of_Poyos HUD-7015.2 (11-7_` 58 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (STATEMENT Of NEEDS) t. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION NUMBER 3. ® ORIGINAL - -06-0506 0 AMENDMENT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 4. PROGRAM YEAR (Eaddement Applicants OWY) FROM: July, 1978 TO: July, 1979 A- -4 Housing Rehabilitation Although much of the City' s housing stock has been built within the last ten years, there are several older areas that have deteriorated and some newer areas that show early signs of decline. Approximately 1950 units require rehabilitation at this time, and both these units and those showing early signs of decline will need to be improved to preserve this critical segment of the housing_._;stock_ to help main- tain housing for low- and moderate-income households. Source: SCAG Community Analysis Report, Robert J. Rodino Assoc. Data Source: A• — Public Works Improvements All of the HCD target neighborhoods require at least some public works improvements. Street i�rovements; lighting; curbs, gutters, and sidewalks and storm sewers; and fire protection facilities are the most frequent needs.- However, some areas also require the removal of architectural barriers for the handicapped or other more specialized improvements for pedestrian mobility and access. Source: Department of Public Works Citizen Comments Data Source: A- 6 Downtown Revitalization The downtown area of Huntington Beach developed early in the 1900 ' s and many of the buildings are now unsightly, do not meet current building codes, and house marginal commercial uses. There are also the attendant problems of parking, pedestrian access, and lack of land- scaping and street furniture. A comprehensive and coordinated appli- cation of all available resources is necessary to correct these problems. Source: Downtown Redevelopment Plan; Planning Staff Citizen Comments I i Downtown Merchants Guild I Data Source: Page_of—Pao*$ HUD-7015.2 (11-75) 59 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (STATEMENT OF NEEDS) t NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION NUMBER ]. ® ORIGINAL -78-MC-06-0506 AMENDMLNT_ _ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 4. PROGRAM YEAR (Enddemant Applicants Only)' FROM: July, 1978 TO: July, 1979 A'-7 Provision of Human Service Needs Each of the City' s HCD target areas is unique by virtue of the charact- eristics of their respective populations. Because of the diverse nature of the neighborhoods, a wide range of human need services and facilities is required, including day care services, social services, counseling and referral, juvenile diversion, health care, senior citi- zen services, transportation, housing assistance, and recreation. In target neighborhoods with a community center, these services are coordinated through the center while assisting and encouraging ,neigh- borhood residents to become self-sufficient. Source: First, Second, and Third Year HCD Programs Citizen Comments Human Resources Council ` Mayor' s Advisory Committee on the Handicapped ` Council on Aging Data Source: A• -8 Provision/Preservation of Recreation and Open Space To fully improve some neighborhoods, it will be necessary to provide recreational open space and/or preserve significant recreational or open space resources. Therefore, acquisition of land and/or purchase of equipment may be required to ensure that these needs of target neigh- borhoods are met. Source: First, Second, and Third Year HCD Programs Citizen Comments a Data Source A- 9 Program Administration As the scope of the HCD Program has increased, the need for a greater commitment to program administration has become evident. Program administration includes compensation to employees assigned to the pro- gram and the attendant operating expenses for employee benefits, supplies, and capital outlay items. Program staff must prepare each year' s application and conduct citizen meetings and public hearings, as well as oversee the implementation of approved CD projects. Also there is a need for administrative service to conduct the environmental review for projects in each year' s CD Program- Data Source: Papa,cf_Payers HUD-7015.2 (11-75) 60 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY Long Term Objectives) Name of Applicant Application Number +�Ur�i�inal B-78-MC-06-0506 [_] Ainon(bnunt Cpjy OP I IUNTIN(JIUN Lil;A(11 Program Year (Entitlement Applicants Only) From: July, 1978 To: June, 1979 1 B-1 1. Revitalization of the Downtown Area - Subsequent to the adoption of a plan for the old Downtown Area, which is now being prepared, a series of City initiated actions will be necessary to implement the plan. These actions will probably include (dependent upon the adopted plan) : Upgrading of existing or construction of new public facilities, new zoning regulations , code enforcement programs and cooperative efforts between public and private sector interests to foster revitalization. Supports Need(s) No: A-1, A-4 , A-5 , A-6, A-7 B-2 2. Provision of Community Services and Necessary Related Facilities to All Residents. Provision of community services and facilities that are not otherwise available to residents of Huntington Beach, particularly low- and moderate-income families , and the elderly, and the handicapped as well as others in need of such services. Supports Need(s) No: A-1, A-5, A-7, A-8 B-3 3. Projects to upgrade Neighborhoods with Indications of Blight and Deterioration - Upgrading program for critical neighborhoods could include: a. Revamp of zoning ordinance to simplify, codify and streamline requirements and particularly, processes. b. Housing code enforcement. C. Underwrite, partially or wholly, off-site public improvements in deficient neighborhoods. d. Develop and provide programs relative to housing rehabilitation, home management, maintenance, budgeting, etc. Supports Need(s) No: A-1, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-7, A-8 Page____of r Pages ; 61 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (Long Term Objectives) Name of Applicant Application Number $J Original 78-MC-06-0506 T 0Amendment C[`(">' n)' IItJN'1'I)1(;IY)i1 I31'J1C;f I Program Yuar (Entitlemont Applicants Only) From: July, 1978 1,,: June, 1979 B-4 4. Impact of Critical Public Works Facilities - a. Improvement of Critical Flood Control and Drainage Facili- ties - Improvement of drainage facilities including upgrading of existing facilities and new construction to bring deficient areas to citywide standards. b. Improvement of Critical Water Facilities - Replacement of out- dated or worn out water facilities in older portions of Huntington Beach to bring water service up to citywide standards. C. Improvement of Street Lighting Facilities in Critical Areas Upgrading or new construction of street lighting in areas below the citywide standards. d. Street Improvements - including resurfacing, curbs, gutters and sidewalks. e. Removal of architectural barriers for the handicapped and provision or improved pedestrian mobility and access. Supports Need(s) No. A-5, A-6 , B-5 5. Provision of Public Facilities in Key Commercial and Industrial Areas - Public assistance in the development of key commercial and industrial areas by providing, in whole or in part, certain public facilities . Supports Need(s) No: A-5 , A-6 , A-8 B-6 6 . Provisions of additional subsidized or low-rent units for low- and moderate-income families, the elderly, and the handicapped. Supports Need(s) No: A-1, A-2, A-3 Page----of r Pages 62 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (Short-Term Objectives) Name of Applicant Application Number Original r ❑Amendment CITY OF HUNTIN(NM BEACH Program Year(Entitlement Applicants Only) From: July, 1978 To: June, 1979 cl D0VZTI' gN/TagNIM CT 993.02 1. Continued funding for Redevelopment Planning. 2. Institute Code Enforcement Program for commercial buildings and renter- and owner- occupied housing. 3. Initiate rehabilitation loans/grants program 4. Provide self-help rehabilitation training _ 5. Provision/improvement of drainage facilities. 6. Provision/improvement of water and sewer facilities. 7. Improvement/provision of streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and alleys. 8. Improvement/provision of street lights and traffic signals. 9. Land acquisition/write-dawn for senior citizen/law-income housing. 10. Improvements to senior citizens. center and T-L-C Program Facility. 11. Provision/improvement of parking facilities. 12.Improve fire protection facilities 13.Support neighborhood organization i Supports Needs)No: A-1, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, A-7 c2 OLDTOM CT 993-03 1. Institute Code Enforcement Program for renter- and owner-occupied housing. 2. Institute rehabilitation loans/grants programs 3. Provide self-help rehabilitation training. 4. Provision/execution of drainage facilities. 5. Provision/improvement of water/sewer facilities. 6. Provision/improvement of streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. 7. Provision of street lights and signals. 8. Provision of open space/ recreational facility. 9. Support Neighborhood organization Program. SupportsNeed(s)No: A-1, A-4, A-5, A-8 c3 OAKVIE[a Cr 994.02 1. Institute Code Enforcement Program for renter- and owner-occupied housing. • 2. Institute rehabilitation loans/grants program. 3. Provide self-help rehabilitation training program. 4. Provision/improvement of water and sewer facilities. 5. Provision/improvement of streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. 6. Provision of street lights/signals. 7. Support neighborhood organization program. 8. Institute juvenile diversion program. 9. Institute police rapport program. 10. Further the outreach services/facilities for center. 11.Improve recreational facilities at neighborhood center. Supports Nsa i(s)No: A-1, A-4, A-5, A--7, A-8 Page of Pages cZ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (Short-Term Objectives) Name of Applicant Ap 1 i n lie 0 Ornpnal 9- - '�-�6-0506 0 AmmuLnent CITY OF I1UNTIN(3MN BEACI I Program Year(Entitlement Applicants Only) From: July, 1978 To: June, 1979 C-4 BUSHARD CT 993.15 1. Support Neighborhood Organization Program 2 . Institute Police Rapport Program Supports Need(s) No: A-1 , A—7 C-5 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION 1. Provide parking for the Newland House Supports Need(s) No: A—1, A—8 C-6 PROJECTS FOR THE HANDICAPPED 1. Removal of architectural barriers. Supports Needs) No: A-1, A-5, A-7 Page of a- Pages 64 HOLS:reG►iSrSTA ?_ V — TABLE! SJRvEY OF :O JSIN. CC�CiT!Ohi A. HOUSwG STATJS A_•.7 CO�iDMO,[OF A'_l HOUS:N_UN'Ti_v THE :A.u,;= .. A- -_ — _ _ _ : - Y, rigina City of Huntington Beach s 7 -MC-06-0506 July, 1978 to June, 1979 -U-3Ei oR•I7u5: _� Ts YEAR All I..IT, �..rR ;- -<,T STATUS AND CG4GITIC� CF ALL OF 1977 54,200 942 35,935 251 18,765 691 »<J 1977 324 0 121 0 203 0 1977 I 53,876 942 35,814 251 18,062 691 Z ''_= �• =a;<unr.; _ r_I 1977 I 1,884 81 912 7 972 74 1977 23 0 2 . 0. 21 0 s s•se <.,_ t .:._ 1977 1,861 81 910 7 951 74 1977 1 56,084 - 1,003 36,847 258 19,237 76 ,. 1977 , 3.36% 7.9% 2.5% 2.7% 5.1% 9.7i "EFt h:TIOtiS, DATA SOU--CES. A4O..=TF::'S --x _.].•— � , SCAG Data based on Regional Housing Allocation _ `•;,uV,Ce4 . ,IR>,. �1•Ma, ;,.o .� Model. Data supplied November 1977 rn rn Form Aporov*d. _ OMB No.63R-1471 ''07' of 2 U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DE,/ELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN - TABLE II HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS NAME ARP�iCA�- 2. APPLICATION GRANT NUMBER 3. — X_ORIGINA,_ B 7 !8 - M C - '0 !6 - 0 '5 0 6 AMENiMEN-. A-E: City of Huntington Beach — 4. RROGRAM YEAR 5, DATE OF HOUS:NG SJRVEY'S' JSEC FROM: July 1978 TO June 1979 I NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS ALL HOUSEHOLDS ALL °EMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS ALL MINORITY HOUSEHOLDS REaUIRIN�, A,; >'AN�E LARGE ! LARGE i LARGE t ELDERLY OR FAMILY ELDERLY OR FAMILY o ELDERLY OR FAMILY FAMILY _ FAMILY FAMILY IHANDICAPPEQ !-i or less C;A, HANDICAPPED m , (¢or less (U or ore :0_AL HANDICAPPED ;nr less (S or more TOTAL (3 or more j1.2 penons/ persons) l-_ : persons) (1.2 persons! persons) persons; p.r, n I j persons) I persons) ;b-r b-2) I— (b-3) I ;b-4) (c-li ic-2) (c-3) (c-4) (d-1) (d-2) (d-3) A. OWNER HOUSEHOLDS r1a nx 4spfe : 1055 239(39) 418 398 349 118(13)1 165 66 149 34(5) 52 63 2' B RENTER HOUSEHOLDS 6729 001(21 q) 3804 1924 2791 770(103h 1467 554 1167 ,174(38) 661 332 -Esciudi dr z,!a.-.c,. 3 C. HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED IN PROGRAM YEAR(Sum of lines CI and C1 4 1. Owners Renters D. ADDITIONAL FAMILIES EXPECTED TO RESIOE s IN COMMUNITY',,,u(lines (?! ,,d 1, ' 71 — 1 Asa result of planned employment— — �;— 414 -- a i Already en,oioyed In localih I 4 10 s E. TOTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS 9647 1247 5262 2940 line. 4. ;<. C end iI ° Percent of Total 100'a 12.9 % 56.6a, 30.5a, -. F. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS Based on data supplied by SCAG from the SLAG Regional Housing Allocation Model, Nov. 1977. *The City of Huntington Beach in the pre-plan phase of a redevelopment project. Because the nature and scope of the project has not been determined, no estimates of displaced persons or households is available at this time. HUD-7015.4(12-751 U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVE'_CPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN - TABLE 11 HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER S. ORIGINAL � AMENOMENT. DATE: City of Huntington Beach 13 - 7 1 8 - M I C I - '0 6 - IO ! 5 I0 i 6 4. PROGRAM YEAR Jul , 197 -. June, 1979 PROVIDE DATE FOR EACH CATEGORY OF MINORITY HOUSEHOLD,AS APPROPRIATE /Check eppropr, - (Check appropriate boil (Check appropriate box) � -_--_- v -A_1. BLACK/NEGRO <� ORIENTAL 1. � BLACK/NEGRO 4. ORIENTAL I.ED� BLACK/NEGRO 4. ORIE'._ STATUS OF 2. SPAWSH-AMERICAN S. ALL OTHER 2.®SPANISH-AMERICAN S. ALL OTHER 2.�`-1 SPANISH-AMERICAN 5. AL: CT-ER HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING _ MINORITIES MINORITIES M,1CRI-:E- ASSISTANCE 3. AMERICAN INDIAN 3.J AMERICAN INDIAN 3. AMERICAN INDIAN LARGE LARGE -APLE ELDERLY OR j FAMILY !ELDERLY OR FAMILY I ELDERLY OR i FAMI_Y _Aw FAMILY FAMILY - TOTAL HANDICAPPED' •4 jr ie>s TOTAL HANDICAPPED- 1 of I—S ' TOTAL HANDICAPPED; .l.,.;,s, !(-°prnon;lI persons! persons!J or more (1-2 p-•sons% person s) I .J persons/or more !1.2 persons): pry.,-'ns, (e•2) (a-4) (a-SY (1-1) (1-2) If-3) (i.4) (9•1) (0-2) (9-3) p•<, 1 A. OWNER HOUSEHOLDS 2 0 1 1 127 31(5) 44 52 20 4(1) 8 1 8 (excluding die cees)-TOtai 2 8. RENTER HOUSEHOLDS 20 3(1) 9 8 1003 148(32) 569 286 146 22(4) 82 42 (excluding die lacees-Total C. HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED j IN PROGRAM YEAR(Sum of lines 1 and 2) 4 Owners s Renters D. TOTAL(Sum of lines.4,8,and C) 22 3 10 9 1130 179(37) 613 338 166 26(5) 90 ' 50 i HUD—.. :.o .— 01 v I,,..,A1,1., —d 0MI1 N,, 6,111 1411 Poyo I of U.',. UFPARIMFNI'UF II0USIN(,AND ORIIAN DEVI LUI'MFNI HOUSING AVJ',IANCE PLAN TABLE III, GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE CURRENT YEAR GOAL I, NAME OF APPLI(-ANI------------_-- i, 'Xi f)ItI,,iN AL ------- — City of Huntington Beach AMUNDMI:N1, I)AT1 : 2. APPLICATION/G,7ANT NUMDEFt 4. PROGRAM vEAR B - 7 1 8 - M I C - 0 6 - 0 5 70 F6 FROM July, 1978 June, 1979 NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED ALL LARGE F:l C)T f11 v ,)11 --- TYPESANDSOURCESOE" ASSISTANCE FI AN CII CA P P E LI FAMi L'I i FAMILY IIOU SEHOLDS (l,rr lr'•, (o) (bl (c) (dl (01 A. NEW RENTAL UNITS 1 I. Section 8-HU_D - - 225 125 i - 100-_ .- z 1. State Agency-TQtol(Sum „f 1,n . „,,,i 11) 3 4 b. Other --- 5 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing (ldrntify) • Total fi a e 4. Total (Sam q i,, , 1.2,.Ind 0 225 125 100 B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS 9 I. Section 8-HUD 10 2. State Agency-Total(Shen „f hne. "ad 10 _ t I - a. Section 8 Iz b. Other t3 3. Other Assisted Rehabilitation of Rental Housing (ldenI# - Total _ 14 IS 16 14. Total 11nrn if liar.. 1, C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS 1 t 1, Section 8-HUD 500 100 275. 12 -- ...... - - - - to 2. Slate Agency-Total_/Sa,n of line. „nd 61 19 a. Section 8 _ zo �b. Other 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (Idenlif)/ - Total _ 2e 4. Total(Su/n of tin r., 1.:.',and i) 500 100 275 125 0. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 25 1. CD Block Grants 200 _75 _ 100L _-25 26 2_$ection 235__ 27 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or Prospective Homeowners(ldenIt fr) - Total z9 b, - ------ 30 4. Total (Snn1 0 lines 1,.. and 1) E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 31 1. Secti 235-.---_---- -- 3z 2. Other(ldenti/�l - Total a- 33 3. Total(Sun of tine.. 1 and 2) i 36 F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS 925 300 375 250 (Surn of lines A 1,B4,C4,D4, and E3) 68 HUD-7015.10(12-75) Pope 2 of 2 popes Of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE III. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE THREE YEAR GOAL I, NAME OF APPLICANT S. IXI ORIGINAL ' City of Huntington Beach I I AMENDMENT. DAIL: 2. Ar'PLICATION.'VItANT NUMBER 4. PROGRAM YFAR e _ 7 8 M C - 0 6 - 0 5 0 6 FROM July, 1978 TO June, 1979 NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED TYPES AND SOURCES OF AS SI SI ANCE FL DE RLY OH FAMILY LARGE ALL HANDICAPPED ({Ilr le.+, FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS (1-211rr>un.`1 Il ersun�/ (�nr rnn n' prrnnnc) (°) (b) (c) (d) le) A. NEW RENTAL UNITS 100 z 1. State Agency-Total(Ju I J hoes 1 and h) _ 3 a. Section B ------- 4 b. Other s 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing 1,-if--1 • 7otol- .. - - - - I- .... - - - - - -- b. e 4. Total (Jum 11r h„1. i._'.and +j 485 ' - 385 100 B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS 9 1, Section R HUD so 2. State Agency- Iotol(.41a1 uJ hoe.. 11 and l l ----- 1 t _ _a._ Section 8 12 b. Other 13 3. Other Assisted Rehabilitation of Rental Housing Total le 4. Total 0un1 nj tine.. 1,2, u1d J, C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS: IT 1. Section 8-HUD 15Q.0_ .._.. .. .._- 150 _970_.._..__.. 16 2. State Agency-Toro)(Sion ul Iln(. n and hl +9 a. Section 8 zo ___b. Other 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing /Idrnrlr7)- Total z a. z3 _ __b. _ 24 4 Total ( I,rn 1 line., 1._ and.1) 1500 ' 0. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS zs 1. CDBIockGronts 40 - 100 _- _ -- 26 2. _Section 135 --_--.- 27 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or Prospective Homeowners�ldentilll- Total �n -- ----- -.. - - - --------- - - -- -- — - — - ------ 29 --- b. 30 4, Total r5a,n I1r❑nea' t. '.Ilnd:1. 200 40 100 60 E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR _..' _PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNER_3_ -- -- 71 1. Section 235 _ 32 -2_Other Lnti o- Total ---_--—_-- __--------_-- _ 34 1s 3. Total(Sam n) tinr.c I and 2) 3(i F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS 21t35 575 1070 540 (Sum n(/snv. .I d,114,1,1.Nd, and 1•,t 11 PERCENT OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS 1001; 26.3 % 49.0 °n 24,7 ro G. EXPLANATION OF PRIORITIES(41t-1,odditinnal logs) IIUD-7015.10(12-75) 69 OMB N.. It%.iPrPAPIMtNI UP 110USINU ANII URIIAN 11I!VPL0PiAfN1 WAI%11,10 AISISIAN(I PLAN TABLE IV GENERAL LOCATIONS POR PROPOSED LOWER INCOME HOUSING I NA., nr a rl a AN I 1XI ('I'I'Y 01' IIlIN'I'IN(;'I'(Y4 111ACII ........ ..... 51-W-Lk- 5 -1 0 July 1974 June 1979 A. till Will Y(:I"I IIAI I UCA WINN LIN MAV IN lilt%APPLICA110H I. Now lAn-.1m,Ilan CN)'411 1 wrl%imilw% The following census tracts have been deemed appropriate for the construction of new Senior Citizen Housing: 993.02, 993.03, 994.02, & 994.03. Cw,li.m I cad N,Pobms it. t XI'1 ANAIION III %ri irc fiom of(:/NI moki LU(AlIONS I. Now Gn"1111H.11411 Census tract determinations based on: the availability of mass transit, existing federal housing, number of vacant units, percent vacant land, shopping facilities, health & elderly facilities, percent of low income elderly. 7. R(ARNH111111)" HUD-7013.11 (12-75) 70 n -�996.02' 0.9 n)n.1 997.02 C14.0D)1.0 81 010.0 �W)LSA > 996.04 E)0.0 9 nlo.4 cl0.o C12.0 U)2.0 U)2.0 M.IAnnl.El E)0.1 6)0.) i 996.05. n. 0�L) 997,03 995.01 994,08 994.07 "C) .0" 0io• rDNCER c)10 994.01 (clt.n . 0 0.2 "0.061 0)0.2 1))2.0994.06 DID.5 DIJ.O 00.a C11.0 C)0.1 E)0.1 CI7.0 614.1 D11.0 ( D)1.0 012.0 IIEn F.10.2 F.10.2 )0.0 992.11 994.05 994.04 994.02 .....T<. ; 994.09 sl 0.21 \. C)1.0 D10.4 0)0.S I r)8.0 C14.0 . - - 0)2.0 - SLATER E)0.2I D)0.9 D)I.0 E10;2 E)0.2 994.09 992.12 n 1 0.04 TAL ERT c)2.0 DI).o D)n.4 C)0.1 C)5.0 a E)0.4 8US b 994.03 GARFIELD 993.01 ¢ 992.13 0.J2 U)9Ul9 9r2 .1 6 c)3.0992.14 D10.7.a n)0,2 D)0.9 C) .0 CI o.9 YO U TOWN E)0.2 D)2.0 E)0.0 0.09 0)0.1 C)2.0992.15 Wo.e ADAMS 992.19 992.18 992.17 4 0.0'I jT UI 0.1 . 4.0 C)4.0 CI 3.0 A) "10.2 t)O.01E DI 0.09 U)2.0 NOIANA►O115 E:10.04 E)0.09 E10.2993.02 E)0. A 993.03 a ATLANTA 1 C)I,0 DI0 S D)1.0 C11.0 6)0.05 :.: D10.9 MAMLTON y F.)0.1 992,20 992.21 BANNING B) % Black C) % Spanish Surname D) % Oriental E) % Other Figure 1-2 PERCENTAGE MINORITIES BY CENSUS TRACT census tracts / 1973 special census L. 71 30% 997.02 996.03 . 32$ N25% 228 99 .94.0 23% 7.03 25% 14f 992.11 995.01 994. 8 994.06 17% 42% 23% 31* 44% 992.11 94.0 7 994.05 994.01 14% 994.09 994.01 36% 24% 66% 43% 994.02 92.12 34% 994.03 94.09 36% 992.14 992.1 53% 43% 46% 33% 993.01 992.13 992315 6 6% 993.0 3 992.19 992.18 992 7 93.02 65% 23% 15% 992.20 992.21 34% 15% Figure 1-3 ED PERCENTAGE LOWER INCOME HOUSEHO DS census tracts / 1973 special census 72 ` THRD YEAR GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT IRS huntington beach planning department Form Approved OMIT No. 63•R)524 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT 1. GRANTEE NAME AND ADDRESS 2. DATE OF PERIOD COVERED City of Huntington Beach BY REPORT 2000 Main Street, P .O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 FROM: August, 1975 TO: November, 1977 3. THE GRANTEE CERTIFIES THAT: • (a) To the best of its knowledge and belief the data in this report was true and correct as of thedate in . Item 2. (b) The records mentioned in 24 CFR Part 570.907 are being maintained and will be made available upon request. (c) Federal assistance made available under the CDBG Program is not being utilized to reduce substantially the amount of local Financial Support for community development activities below the level of such support prior to the start of the CDBG Program Year, TYPED NAMEAND TITLE OFAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE TELEPHONE NO. Floyd G. Belslto, (/nc/udc Area Code) City Administrator (714) 536-5201 DATE HUD-4071 (9-75) 73 1� DM•uwlE: U S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT I. PROGRESS ON ON PLANNED ACTIVITIES *(/t GRANTEE NAME 11[/7 7 ' -R-H-NO CAN 811-AN-""OU""N!AtOUT PORY JHUO D-78-N1'iV-O6F10506 CATION NO CITY OF H=NGTON'BEACH D AMOUNT CURRENT EETIMATEO _LATtO OBUGATtO EXPENDED CURRENT NO. BEEC RIFT N]N BEGUN CENSUS TRACT ORIGIN �M BUDGET KOVINAT2D CURRENT ILETIOM CURRENT LI DATE N[ITEM �� PROGRAM UPS Of PROGRAM LIPS TEAR /ROGwwr TEAR PROGRAA M lU (31 (3i N1 (sl 16l M l81 (91 p0/ pll (131 1 Citizen participation (reprogrammed to program Administration) lst CiT E 6.-77 14 17,3001 0 17,30 p 17,300 2 Assistance to Orange County Housing Authority 1st E 2-76 9 0,000 0 10,000 10,000 3 Conmunity Analysis Project 1st C IT&11E E 9-77 13 8,200 0 I18,200 7,282 17,282 4 Upgrade water facilities-Phase 1 (Thwnlot) 1st 91 3 C2 E 4-76 2 50,000 0 I50,000 0 50,000 5 Loan to Redevelopment Agency 1st 91 3 01 E 9-.77 13 89,500 0 . 89,500 0 67,865 �9! 3 0 I I 19) 3 0 6 Wheelchair ramp installation-Phase 1 1st 91 1 E 9/76 6 1,80011I 24,703 p �24,703 19 1 1 19192 1 I9192 1 19194 0 9) 0 7 Senior Citizen Center improvements i 9;9 0 E 2 76 6 4,5001 0 � 22,342 0 �22,342 i � 1 � I NVD.G10 11'161 P.g. • • • ! a • OMS{lRi]2{ US.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT I. PROGRESS ON PLANNED ACTIVITIES GRANTEE NAMC DATE KRSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTION{ASOUT►ORM NUO GRANT IDENTIFICATION NO CITY OF HUNTINGTOIV BEACH 11/77 Stephen V. Kohler B-78-iC-06-0506 AMOUNT CURRENT ESTIMATED RELATEO OBLIGATED EXKNDED NO. DESCRIPTION TEAR COM- CURRENT BCQUN CENSUS TRACT ORIGIN PLXTION SUDQCT ESTIMATED DATE LINE MEN, COST CURRENT LIFE OP CURRENT LIFE OF PROQRAY PROGRAM TEAR PRO3RAY YEAR MOSRAM (11 (2) (3/ N1 (sl f61 (71 (81 (9) (!O1 0 1/ (121 8 Carmunity Center/Park I A. Oldtown Park (reprogrammed to 3rd year projects) 1st 9 93 0 E drop 2 0,000 50,000 50,000 0 B. O�kview Cam-unity Center 1st 9 94 0 E 4/77 2 53,700 63,700 0 63,420 9 Facilities/Programs for the Handicapped , (reprogrammed to 3rd year projects) 1st 9 94 0� E dropped 6 60,00 105,00 215,000 0 j6 1 10 Bushard Carmunity Center 2nd 199 2 1 E 7/78 2 304,OOC 99,50 99,50� 0 J0 11 Assistance to Orange County Housing Authority (reprogrammed to 3rd year project) 2nd IC I D E dropped 13 10,00 10,00 10,000 0 I 12 Improvements to Senior Citizen Center 2nd 9 93 02 E 7/78 2 96,OOC 50,00 50,00� 0 I �! (46,00 ) (46,0¢0) 13 Oldtown Storm Sewer 2nd 9 93 OL E 4/77 2 $2.7m J0 300,001) 00,00 425,00 ) (425,0(0) 14 Human Resources Day Care Center 2nd C I E dropped 9 32,300 32,300 32,300, 0 15 Loan to Redevelopment Agency 2nd 9 93 OL E 6/78 13 Gg9,500 • 0 89,50 0 67,865 9 9 0 9 93 0 i 16 Shame1 Ash Tree Removal 2nd I DE E 2/77 2 �3,0001 0 43,0001 0 43,000 HUD-{{70(1a6) v Qn rn oM•tawna• U S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1. PROGRESS ON PLANNED ACTIVITIES {RANTER NAME DATE PERSON WHO CAN DEBT ANSWER OUE/TIONS ABOUT FORM HUO GRANT IOERTII IC AT qR NO CITY OF HUNTINU''1'ON BEACH 11 77 Ste h B-78-MC-06-0D06 wroUwT CURRENT ESTIMATED RELATED OBUOATED EiPENDRO NO. DESCRIPTION YEAR CENSUS TRACT ORIGIN Cold- BUDGET CURRENT I BEGUN PLT'O ESTIMATED CURRENT CUNRVWT DATE UNE REY Corr .:MA" Wt 01 PROGRAM Lira TEAR PROGRAM TEAR PE/OORAM (1) (2) (3) N/ P) (6) (7) (ll /fi /!01 (Iti (11/ 17 Program Administration 2nd C T&IME E 8/77 - 14,90 293.E 200 >3 .15,200 18 Facilities/Programs for the Handicapped i (reprogrammed to 3rd year projects) 2nd 9 S.4 02 E Idropped 660,00 110,00 215,0 0 19 Local Option 3rd B I Imo, - 24,946 0 20 Oldtown Storm Sewer - Phase II 3rd 9 S2 13 A i 3/78 2 $2.7m '300,00 600,0 0 306,08 ) (u6 21 Senior Citizens Housing Site 3rd C1 WNIME A 6/78 ! 1 250,00 0 0 I p 22 Bushard Community Center 3rd 9 S2 15 A 7/78 19 304,800 0 P9,500 I 23 Senior Citizen Center 3rd 9 S3 02 A 6/78 6 105,00 p1 I j i 24 Oakview Day Care Center 3rd 9 S14 02 A 7/78 9 165,00 p1 I p 25 Handicapped Nobility 3rd C1 T&IME A 5/78 6 43,500 jd 26 Rehabilitation loans 3rd II E A 7/80 5 700,00 f6 + yl 27 Oakview Outreach Program 3rd 9 S4 02 A 7/78 9 12,50 fd 28 Renovation of City Gym 3rd 9 S3 02 A 7/78 6 20,00 f6 I Jd 29 Del Naar Storm Sewer 3rd 9 2 1 A 3/78 2 0,000 20Q,,000 200,0!b0� 30 Dangerous Building Code 3rd 9 S3 02 A 7/78 3 40,00 0 �! 31 Program Administration 3rd A f6/78 - 52,754 !8,529 ` '� 3 -1 3 MUPN1.11- a, 1 . Citizen Participation (reprogrammed to Program Administration) The citizen participation process is progressing well . Letters to advise civic groups of the application process are sent each year and presentations to explain the HCD program and solicit citizen participation and support have been made by the Planning Department to numerous such organizations . Phone contact has been made with organizations not responding to the letters to encourage them to schedule a presentation at one of their meetings . In addition, an HCD opinion survey was conducted during the preparation of the third year application. The survey sampled 300 low and moderate income families in Huntington Beach to tap their views on Housing and Community issues . This project provides funding for the administration, personnel , equipment and citizen participation elements of the HCD program. 2 . Assistance to the Orange County Housing Authority This project funded a one-year contract with the Orange County Housing Authority to provide a full-time tenants relations officer ! to administer the Section 8 Housing Program in the City of Huntington Beach. This project worked very well , providing needed housing as- sistance and counseling to area residents . The agreement was not renewed after the first year because of project criticism from a number of private persons and civic organizations. 3 . Community Analysis Report The Community Analysis Report is a project funded to implement a com- prehensive study of housing conditions and problems in the City, and to statistically document the need for rehabilitation and other forms of housing assistance. This study, completed in September 1977 , provides a data base for the formulation of a housing assistance stragegy . The project designates target neighborhoods , and outlines possible re- habilitation strategies . The project was originally to have been conducted by University of ' California, Irvine, student interns , but this approach proved to be infeasible. Consequently, the project was put out to bid and a consultant team was retained to conduct and complete the project . 4 . Upgrade Water Facilities ' This project funded the replacement and upgrading of the water supply system in selected portions of the Oldtown Area. No problems were encountered in the implementation of this project and it was completed in April, 1976 . 5. Loan to Redevelopment Agency 1 Allocations of funding for this project were made in an effort to facilitate the development of planning studies and the eventual adoption of a redevelopment plan for the downtown area . Preliminary studies have been completed, but the adoption of a redevelopment plan is still pending. 1 77 6 . Wheelchair Ramp Installation: Phase I This project funded the construction of approximately 150 curb cuts throughout the City to improve handicapped mobility. The project was completed through a $29 , 000 public works contract on October 1 , 1976 . However, , $2 , 000 was withheld from the contractor pending investigation of alleged violations of HUD regulations governing pay- roll procedures. 7 . Senior Citizen Center Improvements This project funded the purchase of recreation equipment and a van for the Senior Citizen Recreation Center. Funds in the amount of $9 , 500 were transferred to this account from redevelopment studies as part of the previously processed Community Development Program amendment, and the project was completed in February, 1976 . 8A. Oldtown Park Bids for an independent appraisal of Cal Trans property were approved by the City Council on September 7 , 1976 . This appraisal was completed the week of October 18 , 1976 . The Department of Parks and Recreation renegotiated with Cal Trans for acquisition of the Community Center site, however , the asking price far exceeds the amount budgeted and the Council reprogrammed these funds to new projects as part of the City ' s Third Year HCD Program. 8B. Oakview Community Center The initial construction bids for this project were rejected in July, 1976 . A second phase of bids were rejected by the City Council on August 9 , 1976 . Bids were readvertised on August 11 , 1976 , and opened on August 30 , 1976 . The City Council awarded a contract on September 7 , 1976 , to Robert C. Stellrecht for $63 , 685. 00. Construction of the community center was completed in June , 1977 , and the facility is now fully operational . 9 . Facilities and Programs for the Handicapped These funds are allocated to pay a share of the cost of a pool and swim complex with facilities for the handicapped. The tentative determination is to locate this facility at the Ocean View High School site with the Huntington Beach Union High School District contributing the land and maintenance . An ad hoc committee of Council members, Huntington Beach Union High School District representatives , a Parks and Recreation Commissioner, representatives of City Administration and Parks and Recreation Department has been formed to discuss the provisions of mutual recre- ational facilities. The first meeting of this committee was on Thursday, October 21, 1976 . Problems have been encountered in acquiring the necessary additional funds to construct this facility and the City Council has reprogrammed these funds to Third Year HCD Projects. 78 • 10 . Bushard Community Center This project is intended to fund the construction of a new multiple- use community center. The facility will provide on-site office space for social service organizations, community meeting rooms , a mat room, and recreation facilities. The project, to be administered by the Huntington Beach Boys ' Club, is sited on a portion of the Bushard/Oka Schools playing fields . The project willbe, put out to to bid in January, 1977 , and the facility should be completed in July, 1978 . • 11 . Assistance to the Orange County Housing Authority Program was dropped, and funds were reprogrammed to third Year projects . See Project #2 for narrative description. • 12 . Improvements to the Senior Citizen' s Center This project provides funding for physical improvements to the Senior Citizen' s Center. These include the construction of additional lighted parking facilities , outdoor recreation facilities and landscaping. Public meetings were held with senior groups to determine the type S of program needed, and improvement plans have been drawn up and approved by the City Council. Construction bids were taken in October, 1977 , and the City is now awaiting environmental clearance and the release of funds. Project funding of 50,000 (HCD) is being supple- mented with $46 , 000 from the City. i 13. Oldtown Storm Sewer Funds for this project have been matched by the Orange County Flood Control District ($300 , 000) and local drainage fees ($125 ,000) . The project is directed towards alleviating drainage problems and seasonal flooding of the Oldtown area. After completion of the EIR for this p project, a negative declaration was published on May 20 , 1976 . The City Council awarded the contract for construction of the first phase of the storm sewer on September 13, 1976 . The location of private oil pipelines within the project right-of-way caused some delay in implementation of the first phase • of construction, but this portion of the project has now been completed. 14 . Human Resources Day Care Center The funds requested for this project proved insufficient for implementatiol due to unexpectedly high liability insurance premiums. Therefore, on • October 26, 1976, the City Council reprogrammed these funds to an additional project to increase handicapped mobility. The City is now working with the Mayor' s Handicapped Advisory Committee to determine what type of project will most benefit the City' s handicapped residents . 15. Loan to the Redevelopment Agency (See Project #5) 16 . Shamel Ash Tree Removal This project was begun in late 1976 , and no problems were encountered in implementing the project. The Ash Tree removal program was completed in February, 1977. 79 17 . Program Administration This project provides funding for the administration, personnel, equipment and citizen participation elements of the HCD program. 18 . Facilities and Programs for the Handicapped (See Project #9) 19 . Local Option These funds have not been committed at this time. 20. Oldtown Storm Sewer Construction on the second phase of the Oldtown Storm Sewer is scheduled to begin in December, 1977 . A construction contract was awarded in October, 1977 . $300 ,000 of HCD funding for this project will be supplemented with $309 , 000 in local drainage fees. 21. Senior Housing Site This project provides funding for the acquisition of a site for the construction of subsidized housing for low-income citizens . The City has not yet found a suitable site, and the project is pending the completion of a survey of potential housing locations . 22 . Bushard Community Center This project, which will provide for the construction of a multiple- use community facility, will be completed in July, 1978 . The lease agreement between the City and the Fountain Valley School District providing the site was completed in August, 1977 , and the agreement providing for management of the facility by the Huntington Beach Boys' Club is presently being reviewed by the City Council. 23 . Senior Citizen Center This project provides for the construction of a 3 , 000 square foot additiol to the Senior Citizen Center. The project is now awaiting the com- pletion of environmental clearance and the release of funds. 24. Oakview Day Care Center Construction of the Oakview Day Care Center should begin in Spring, 1978 . A site for the facility has been selected and a lease and management agreement has been completed between the City and the Oceanview School District. The lease agreement is now pending review and was approved by the County Superintendent of Schools on November 10 , 1977 . 80 • 25 . handicapped Mobility The Handicapped mobility project provides for a program of physical improvements aimed at increasing the mobility of handicapped persons. Meetings between the City and the Mayor ' s Advisory Committee for the Handicapped have been completed, and a plan calling for wheelchair ramps , curb-cuts , special traffic signals and communication equipment has been approved. The project is now pending the completion of environmental review and the release of funds . 26 . Rehabilitation Loans This project, providing for a program of rehabilitation loans in target low and moderate income neighborhoods , will be implemented in January, 1978 , and is the first phase of a four year program. The request for a proposal process was begun in November, 1977 , and it is expected t, that a consultant will be selected in December, 1977 . 27 . Oakview Outreach Program This project is presently pending the completion of environmental certification and the release of funds . The Oakview Outreach Program • is projected for implementation in January, 1978 . 28 . Renovation of City Gym This project , which will provide recreational facilities for handicapped persons , is presently pending the completion of environmental clearance and the release of funds . Representatives from the City and the Parks and Recreation Department are presently meeting with the Mayor ' s Advisory Committee for the Handicapped to structure a program of project priorities and the development of an improvement plan. 29 . Del Mar Storm Sewer The first construction phase of the Del Mar Storm Sewer will begin in December, 1977 . Bids have been submitted and reviewed, and a contractor was selected in October, 1977 . 30 . Dangerous Building Codes • This project is presently pending environmental clearance and the release of funds. Project implementation is anticipated in January, 1978 . 31. See Project #17 . • • R1 OMB 63RI52� U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT b v I-A HOUSEHOLDS BENEFITTING FROM ACTIVITIES UNDERWAY OR COMPLETED-PHYSICAL AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS GRANTEE NAME DATE PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT HUD GRANT IDENTIFICATION 11 77 THIS FORM NUMBER CITY OF HUNTDT,' 'ON BEACH Stephen V. Kohler PROJECT/ HOUSEHOLDS BENEFITTING MINORITY HOUSEHOLDS ACTIVITY ID DESCRIPTION BENEFITTING_%OF TOTAL (2b) NUMBER TYPE TOTAL % LOWER SPANISH/ AMERICAN ALL INCOME SOURCE OR SCALE BLACK AMERICAN INDIANS ORIENTAL OTHER (1) (2a) (2b) (2c) (2d) (3a) (3b) (3Q) (3d) (3a) 4 B 2062 66 Census Tract 993.02 0.4 4.0 U:4 0.2 6 B 1275 14 Census Tracts 993.11 0.6 4.0 0.5 0.3 1205 43 992.12 0.5 4.0 1.0 0.2 1399 53 992.14 0.2 3.0 0.9 0.3 1436 43 992.16 0.2 3.0 0.9 0 402 3002 44 994.01 0.5 3.0 2.0 0 ,3 1337 66 994.02 0.4 8.0 0.9 0 .2 7 B 2062 66 Census Tract 993.02 0.4 4.0 0.4 0.2 8b B 1337 66 Census Tract 994.02 0.4 8.0 0.9 0.2 13 B 2161 65 Census Tracts 993.03 0.1 4.0 0.09 0.09 1920 46 993.01 0.2 7.0 0.7 0.2 16 A HUD-4076.+ (/ 76) H11i14�. gton Beacli S:De�_CPn-l]S ;1973, 7 Bef=ence Source • • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 OM8 63R4112.. U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1-B POPULATION BENEFITTING FROM ACTIVITIES UNDERWAY OR COMPLETED - SERVICES OR ASSISTANCE GRANTEE NAME DATE PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT HUD GRANT THIS FORM IDENTIFICATION NO. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 11/77 Stephen V. Kohler B-78-MC-06-0506 POPULATION BENEFITTING MINORTIY POPULATION BENEFITTING % OF TOTAL (2b) AC- TIVITY SPANISH- AMERICAN ORIENTAL ALL OTHER ID % % LOWER BLACK AMERICAN INDIAN NUM- TYPE TOTAL % MALE FEMALE INCOME Be" MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE (11 (2a) (2b) (2c1 (2d) (ge) (3a) (3b) (3c) (3d) (3e) (3f) (3B) (3h) (3i) (31) 1 A 2 A 3 A * 5 B 6143 59.3 .2 NA 5.2 NA NA .4 NA .1 NA * 15 B 6143 59.3 .2 NA 5.2 NA NA .4 NA .1 NA 17 A 31 A Paps of papa HUD-4078 (1-76 Huntu. x�ton Beach Special Census - 1973; Reference Source ' *Pr, ct�-Area sus Tracts 991 01`- 99` `:02; 99$ 03 inclusive DD OME 93RIS24 U.S.OE/^FITMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT I-C RELOCATION FUNDED UNDER CDBG NOTE:COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH ACTIVITY LISTED ON FORM HUD4070 WHICH GENERATED A'RELOCATION WORKLOAD. GRANTEE NAME OAT! ACTIVITY NUMBER [ERSO" WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THif FORM T-B--78-M-06-05 D GRANT IDENTIFICATION MBER CITY CAI HUNT BEACH 11/77 Stephen V. Kohler 06 RELOCATION,BY HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD TOTAL MINORITY WORKLOAD WORKLOAD ITEM DESCRIPTION BLACK S►ANISH AMERICAN AMERICAN INDIAN ORIENTAL ALL OTHER MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE ►!MALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE /!a/ (!b/ (2a) (2b) (2c) I2CJ (2e) (21) (22l (2h! l2U 121) * ' TOTAL RELOCATION WORKLOAD (!( (X 2 PLACED IN TEMPORARY HOUSING __ T I Y ON-SIT[ j 1 ! b OFF-SITE 3 BALANCE IN WORKLOAD I 4 REMOYEO FROM WORKLOAD WHEREABOUTS UNKNOWN S PSRMANENT LY RELOCATED, BY CENSUS TRACT a b I I I II I I 1 *No project undertaken under the HCD program has resulted in any relocation activities PAGc O. PAGES Form App,oved OMB No. 63•R1524 II . Recipient Assessment 24 CFR 570. 906 (b) (2) I. Statutory National Objectives The following constitute the general objectives established by Congress for the national program of Community Development Block Grants. It is not anticipated that any one community' s CD program, in any one year, will deal with each objective. (The local program, of course, remains subject to the assurance, required by law, concerning giving maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low- or moderate-income families or aid in the prevention of elimination of slums or blight) . For each of the following E general objectives , check the appropriate box to indicate whether the current program year ' s activities do or do not contribute to that objective. Briefly explain, on a separate sheet of paper, all affirmative responses, in- dicating how the current program year ' s activities have contributed to each objective. CD Program Does Does Not Contribute Contribute (1) Elimination of slums and blight and prevention of blighting influences. X (2) Elimination of conditions detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare through code enforcement, demolition, interim rehabilitation assistance, and related X activities. (3) Conservation and expansion of the nation' s housing X stock (4) Expansion and improvement of the quality and quality of community services X (5) More rational utilization of land and other natural resources and better arrangement of needed activity centers X HUD•4080(1.76) 85 2 Does Does Not Contribute Contribute (6) Reduction of the isolation of income groups within communities and promotion of an increase in the diversity and vitality of neighborhoods X (7) Restoration and preservation of properties of special value for historic, architectural, or X esthetic reasons. II. Short-Term Objectives Using a separate sheet of paper , list all short-term objectives which are being addressed by this year ' s CD program. (Use the numbers from the previous Community Development Plan Summary: C-1 , C-2 , etc. ) . Briefly explain how the current program year ' s activities have contibuted to each objective. For each objective list the numbers of the activities listed on the Progress on Planned Activities (HUD-4070) that contibute to that objective. HUD-4080(1-76) 86 • I . Recipient Assessment 1 . The community analysis report, completed in September , 1977 , analyzes and documents the need for housing and neighbor- hood assistance in declining residential neighborhoods . The report provides a data base for future housing and neighborhood preservation projects . Loans made to the downtown redevelopment agency work to provide assistance for feasibility studies directed towards creating an effective program for dealing with the decline of the downtown commercial area and surrounding residential neighborhood . The current year program approaches the problem of blight in two areas (1 ) the rehabilitation program which will target rehabilitation funds into low- and moderate-income nei hborhoods experiencing physical deterioration , and ?2 ) the Dangerous Building Code program which is directed towards bringing downtown commercial structures up to present safety and structural standards . 0 2. See above. 3 . Completed projects addressing this objective include the community analysis report which analyzes the condition of declining neighborhoods, and documents the need for housing assistance. Current year projects directed 1P towards this area of concern include the proposed acquisition of a site for low-income senior citizen housing scheduled for completion in 1978, and the rehabilitation loan program which will be oriented towards conservation of the existing housing stock and the preservation of declining neighborhoods . This project r will be implemented in January , 1978. 4. Considerable progress has been made towards meeting this objective. Improvements to the Senior Citizen Center have been completed and expansion of the facility will be implemented during the current program year. The Oak View Community Center was completed in June , 1977 and is now fully operational , offering a full program of recreation and cultural activities and needed social services . Programs scheduled for the current program year include the construction of the Bushard Community Center and the Oak View Day Care Center and the 0 renovation of the City Gym. 5. This objective has been fulfilled through the provision of community facilities in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods and the expansion of existing activity centers . Projects addressing this concern include the P recently completed Oak View Community Center and the 87 completed improvements to the Senior Citizen Center. Projects currently scheduled for implementation include the construction of the Bushard Community Center, the Oak View Day Care Center which will be built adjacent to the existing Oak View Community Center and the expansion of the Senior Citizen Center. 6 . Fulfillment of this objective has been actively addressed through both past and current year programs . The recently completed community analysis report provides documentation for neighborhood preservation programs . The completed construction of the Oak View Community Center and the current year Bushard Community Center project provide facilities and services in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods , effectively reducing the isolation of low income groups and ethnic minorities . The current year rehabilitation loans and Dangerous Code enforcement programs are directed towards increasing the vitality of declinging neighborhoods and maintaining a diversity of housing choices . 88 • II. Short-Term Objectives Cl. Revitalization of Downtown Area Although past years activities have not actively fulfilled this objective, current projects do address this concern. The Dangerous Code Enforcement program will focus on the downtown area, which has a high incidence of structural deficiencies and hazardous buildings, and attergnt to bring ! these up to buidling code safety standards. Loans made to the Redevelopment Agency in the first program year worked to fund revitalization studies for the downtown, and the current year Rehabilitation Loan Program will target low- interest loan monies into downtown residential_ neighborhoods. • Projects 5,15,26 and 30 address this objective. C2. Community Services Considerable progress has been made towards fulfilling this objective. Specifically, improvements to the Senior Citizen ! Center have been completed, and further improvements and additions to the facility are planned. The Oakview Community Center has been completed providing low and moderate income residents with a recreation facility and a full range of social services, and the adjacent Oakview Day Care Center will be under construction during the current program year. Other current year projects addressing this objective include construction of the Bushard Community Center which will provide r-ec.reation and service facilities for a low to moderate income area experiencing a high incidence of juvenile-crime related problems, and the renovation of City Gym. Projects addressing this objective include 7, 8B, 10, 12, 22, 23, 24, and 28. C3. Upgrade Declining Neighborhoods Although no physical progress has been made towards meeting this objective, programs providing a data base for .future projects have been completed. The Community Analysis Report, completed in September, 1977 , provides documentation for rehabilitation efforts, and loans to the Redevelopment Agency have provided impetus for studies addressing the problem of blight in the downtown area. Current year programs addressing this area of concern include the Rehabilitation Loan Program and the Dangerous Code Enforcement Program. Projects addressing this objective include 3 ,5,15,26 , and 30. 89 C4 . Improve Critical Public Facilities Completed projects fulfilling this objective include the improvement and replacement of substandard water facilities in the downtown - townlot neighborhood, and the completion of the first construction phase of the Oldtown Storm-Sewer Project. Current year projects addressing this objective include the second construction phase of the Oldtown Storm- Sewer and the first phase of construction on the Del Mar Storm-Sewer Project. Projects 4 ,13 ,20 , and 29 address this objective . C5 . Provision of Public Facilities in Key Commercial and Industrial Area None of the orojectsfunded under past year or current year programs directly address this objective . C6 . Provision of Facilities and Necessary Related Services to the Elderly and Handicapped This objective has been actively addressed through both completed and planned HCD activities . The installation of wheelchair ramps, completed in September, 1976 , and the current year Handicapped Mobility project work to eliminate physical barriers for handicapped persons. The recently completed improvements to the Senior Citizen Center and currently planned expansion of the Senior 's facility work to expand the scope and level of services available to the elderly. The current year senior citizen housing site acquisition will provide a location for the construction of low-income housing for the elderly. Projects 6 , 7, 12 , 21, 23 and 25 contribute to the fulfillment of this objective. C8 . Park and Recreation Facilities in Critica71 Neighborhoods The provision of recreation facilities in low and moderate income target neighborhoods has been actively addressed in both past year and current year programs. The recently completed Oakview Community Center provides needed recreation facilities in a tar-et neighborhood, and the current year Bushard Community Center project will provide for the construction of a multinle-use recreation facility in an area with a high juvenile crime rate. Other projects addressing this objective include the completed improvements to the Senior Citizen Center and current year expansion of the facility, and the renovation of City Gym, planned for comp- letion during the current program year. Projects 7, 8b,10,12 , 22 ,23 and 28 contribute to this objective. 90 • III-A HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROVIDED Narrative Report 1. Steps to Meet HAP Goals: The City of Huntington Beach HAP goals utilize both existing units and new construction. The administration of the HAP existing program, by agreement, is the responsibility of the Orange County Housing Authority. No financial commitment has yet been received for Section 8 New Construction ! Units. 2. Steps Taken to Improve Ability to Meet HAP Goals: The City of Huntington Beach funded a Tenant Relations Officer to work under the auspices of the Orange Housing e Authority and work exclusively in Huntington Beach for calendar year 1976 . The City also received a pre- selected site designation for Section 8 New Construction Units. 3 . Problems Encountered: Fair market rents were too low until HUD raised them. Too much emphasis was placed on the elderly in the first year, therefore, the second year application places less emphasis on the elderly. The existing unit program has worked well in the City, however, the agreement with Orange County Housing Authority for a full-time tenant relations officer came under criticism by two civic groups within the City and the City Council acted to not renew the agreement for calendar year 1977 . r 1 r 91 U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT III—A HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROVIDED ORA NTea NAM[ DAT[ P ERSONO CAN e[9T ANSWER MVO GRANT IU NO ASO VT THIS FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BE A 11/77n V. Kohler -78-MC-06-05 6 ELDERLY OR HANDICAPPED l (1 2 TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE ------ _ OCCU►1[VC ' COM-COAL MI GOAL MITTEV MITOTAL NORITY CAPP[U lla/ t2a) t2b/ /2r) f2d) l�) A. NEW RENTAL UNITS: 1. Section 8-HUD 285 Jo 285 State Agency-Total Sum of lines a 4 6 a. Section 8 b. Other _ 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing (Identify) Total a �- -- — -- -- 4. Total: (Sum of lines 1,2,d 3) 285 0 285 B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS: I. Section 8-HUD 2_State Agency-ToW/Sum of lined 6 b/ __-- a. Section 8 — b. Other --- - --- -----r— -----+---� - __-7--- 3. Other AssWisd Rehabilitation of Rental Housing (Identify) Total a T- b. 4. ToW (Sum of lines 1, 2, 6 3) C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS: --------- -- _--- --�! — 1. Section 8-HUD 1267 335 304 3351 193 181 Unkn Unk 2. State -Agency-4- 1- (S--um of-------lines---a-d—bJ--- ---- ---- --- - - - -- - ota a. Section 8 _ b. Other - 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (Identify) Total b. 4. Total(Sum of line., 1, 2, & 3) — 1267 335 304 335 193 181 Onkri Unk O.REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOME- OWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 1. CD Block Grants 2 0 0 _ _7 5_ _ 2. Section 235 - 3. Other Rehabilitation Asslatance to Owners b. --- — - --- --- 4. Total()Sum of lines 1, 2, d 3) _ 200 0O E. NEW CONSTRUCTION^11SISTANCE TO HOME- OWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS: I. Section 235 0 0 1u Jo 1 Jo 2. Ouse(Identilyj Total a. b. _ 3. Total(Sum of lines I +2) 0 rloo Jo .0 'o 10 ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE IS.-of It"s A4.84.CI,D4..nd 631 7 5 2 335 304 695 193 181 pnkn unkri P.O. 1 of 2 HU04076(1-76) 92 U&D"An"NUT O/N lly okswe A &OWW DEVEI.OPIANT eMa No.as 0•16u III-A NOIJ M AWWAMM I MNIND awANTaa wwaa *ATa vemeN mm em owv Aww" we ONANT to we. emu"$*"A//YT TNM now �-78-W-06--as)6 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAC ll/77 Stephen V. Kohler FAMILY LAww FAMILY r1 r Mr d.uwy tj or aura TYa/E AND 60LORM OF ANGWANOE 001A e6CYMN 00 4mem"we 6Nwvm 6AN 71*w w A rg"ge Yetwi.mimOwivV swot ift as A.NEM MENTAL 1MSM • 1. soouoe srRw 1 2. State Slow of Man a!► a. R Odom 3. Odw Amblad Now Rmtd SoA6E /ldtnttfj'1 YaW b. 4. Tow Mum of Nna 1,2,and 3) '0 J J0 E. REN"LITATION Of MENTAL UNITts 1. laotloe"UD 1" J0 2. Staa •Told ISUM of Enas a t► L SWOM a ►. Odw 3. Odw AalWW RobabiHisdow of Raged ilaldq(ldint(y) Told a. b. �f �t �1 �1 n� �X �( 4. Told(Sum of M ui 1.2.! 3) 0 0 0 10 0 l� J� Y c. ExlmNo RENTAL UMM I. saatloe$—BUD 674 5 A6 uikn unkn253, 89 177 unkn mkn 2. sat. •Totd SIMI of Eaas a!1 a. soatb►w a b. Odmw i 3. Odw AmbW ssirtby Rowtd NOON (Identify) Told a. b. 4. Told(sum of una 1. 2,A !) 671 53 46 unkn unkn 53 89 77 unkn krik-n D.RENA/1LITATION AOIETANCE TO NOW- ORUIERE oft►ROMWme NowO11E1lro 1. CD Rloeb Grua 10 J J0 25 0 0 2. SWUM 235 3. Otbw RokWAkmdm AmMemo to*WR (ldentlfY) Told a. b. 4. Toed(3awr of Mna 1,2.!3) 10C J0 J0 5 L MW OO/ATRUCTWO AMMAMN To MONOOMW an OR NwwEanvE NOEIEOEEIERE.. 1. sasuee 235 Y 10 0 J0 110 J0 2. OMn Told a. b. i I. Tod 1"m of bow 1 r 21 ALL NOUEINR AWWANM Pon of Ea.A4.84 OC or,ad8#1 1279 53 46 unkn unkn 27 89 77 Unkri I.a•a.t a. - MADAM le•eM i 93 OMB 63RI' HUD GRANT 10ENTIF!CATION NO `p U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT B-7$—MC-06-0506 III-13 LOCATION OF UNITS WITH FINANCIAL COMMITMENT (Attach ,ifap) SMSA CODE NUMBER OF UNITS F-FAMILY E-ELDERLY CENSUS TRACT TOTAL NEW REHABILITATION EXISTING (al (b) (`) (d) (`) $ 9 2 1 1 8 4 Family, 4 Elderly 9 9 2 1 2 16 8 Family, 8 Elderly 9 9 2 1 3 3 3 Family 9 9 2 1 .4 4 2 Family, 2 Elderly 9 9 2 1 5 10 9 Family, 1 Elderly 9 9 2 1 6 4 4 Elderly 9 9 2 1 7 3 3 Elderly 9 9 2 1 8 3 2 Family 1 Elderly 9 9 2 1 9 3 1 Family 2 Elderly 9 9 3 0 1 22 14 Family, 8 Elderl: 9 9 3 0 2 47 7 Family, 40 Elderl 9 9 3 0 3 41 19 Family, 22 Elder. 9 9 4 0 1 22 7 Family, 15 Elderl g g 4 0 2 52 26 Family, 26 Elder 9 4 013 17 9 Family, 8 Elderly 9 4 0 12 10 Family, 2 Elderl g 4 0 1 1 Family 9 4 0 1 1 Family 9 4 0 11 7 Family, 4 Elderly 9 5 0 2 2 Elderly �r . s w w • w • A • • OM6 63R1524 HUD GRANT IDENTIFICATION NO U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT B-78-MC-06-0506 III-B LOCATION OF UNITS WITH FINANCIAL COMMITMENT (Attac'h Vap) SMSA CODE NUMBER OF UNITS F—FAMILY E—ELDERLY CENSUS TRACT TOTAL NEW REHA131LITATION EXISTING (ol (e) 1c) (d) (•1 9 9 6 0 2 12 2 Family, 10 Elderly 9 9 6 0 3 3 3 Family 9 9 6 0 4 1 1 Family, ( 9 9 6 0 5 6 1 Family, 5 Family rl HUD-4069 (1-76, IY-F-2 f'amil y- 3 SA 7.02 91) )96.03 996.04 F-1 996.05 5., 997 0 )94.07 ED.4CER Elderly- E,2 994.06 994.06 F ld e,r-ly-1 F amp ly -9 F-1 994.01 992.11 995-01tI y �":L(11," Y-4 N —1 )':l(lC!T-]-Y26 00 i in y -7 Y-2 6 994.09 U FT 9')4.02 `lderly-8 3 ,AEI Family -9 994.03 92.14 2 - QARFJEJO .01 16,e r L y- Elderl, .......... 2 4 I y-8 992.13. F-3 ,cami.ly YORKTOWN y amil - 4 "amily 9 , '192.15 E-1 992.1f ADA.S Q9 cN r-H Mder 1y-2 E,',Id er I yl n,,- 'o 1 Family-2 1. -2 Family- a INDIANAPOUS W"..41 H ATLANTA 993.03 HAMLION 92. 2 0 992.21 BANNING LOCATION OF ASSISTED HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE census tracts / 1973 special census 96 _ Form Approved OMB No. 63-R1521 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT IV.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS GRANTEE NAMF- _ DATE PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH November, 1977 ABOUT THIS FORM Stephen V. Kohler WHEN EIS REQUIRED y CONDITIONED STATUS OF DATE OF PROJECT AND DATE ENVIRON- ENVIRON- DATE DATE NO ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORIC CERTIFICATION ACTIVITY MENTAL REVIEW MENTAL DRAFT EIS FINAL EIS REVIEW NECESSARY PRESERVA- TO HUD PER HUD FUND DESCRIPTION STARTED REVIEW TO CEQ TO CEQ PER 24 CFR 58.19(c) TION 24 CFR 58.30 RELEASE DATE ljl (2) (3) (4) (S) (6) (7) (8) (9) i 1 2/1/76 Nn EIS NA NO 4/76 NA 2 12/76 No EIS NA NO 2/4/76 NA 3 2/76 No EIS NA NO 4/76 NA 4 12/75 No EIS NA NO 2/4/76 NA I 5 No EIS NA NO 6 2/l/76 No EIS NA NO 4/76 NA 7 12/75 No EIS NA NO 2/4/76 NA 8 (A) 10/75 No EIS NA NO 2/4/76 NA 8 (B) 10/75 No EIS NA NO 2/4/76 NA 9 No EIS NA NO 10 10/76 No EIS NA NO 7/77 8/77 11 Dropped No EIS NA NO NA NA 12 6/1/77 No EIS NA NO 10/26/77 NA 13 5/76 EIS Re NA NO 8/17/76 9/8/76 uired 14 8/76 No EIS NA NO 9/10/76 10/29/76 15 8/76 No EIS NA NO 9/10/76 10/29/76 16 5/76 No EIS NA NO 8/17/76 9/8/76 18 Dropped No EIS NA NO NA NA Page 1 Qf 2 - HUD•e075 (1-76- ,D J Form, Apprcvzj 01.1E No. 63-R1524 00 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT IV.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS GRANTEE NAMF _ DATE - PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH November, 1977 Stephen V. Kohler WHEN EIS REQUIRED CONDITIONED STATUS OF DATE OF PROJECT AND DATE ENVIRON- ENVIRON- DATE DATE NO ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORIC CERTIFICATION ACTIVITY MENTAL REVIEW MENTAL DRAFT EIS FINAL EIS REVIEW NECESSARY PRESERVA- TO HUD PER HUD FUND DESCRIPTION STARTED REVIEW TO CEQ TO CEO PER 24 CFR 56.19(c) TION 24 CFR 58.30 RELEASE DATE (1) (2) (3) (4) (SI (6) (7) (8) (9) 20 5/76 EIS Rk§- YES NO 10/6/77 quired 21 10/31/77 No EIS NA NO 22 10/10/77 No EIS NA NO 23 10/31/77 No EIS NA NO 24 10/10/77 No EIS NA NO 25 10/31/77 No EIS NA NO 26 10/10/77 No EIS NA NO 27 10/31/77 No EIS NA NO 28 10/31/77 No EIs NA NO 29 9/77 No EIS NA NO 10/6/77 30 11/1/77 No EIS NA NO I i I I I I Page of 2 HUD-:075 (1-76; , Form Approved OMB No 63 R1524 V-A. Equal Opportunity in CDBG Programs or Activities 24 CFR 570.900(c)(1 ) 1 . Indicate the person who can best answer questions regarding this section. NAME STEPHEN V. KOHLER (714 536-5549 Phone ! TITLE Housing and Community Development Specialist ADDfESS 2000 Main Street, P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach CA. 92648 (Room H) 2. For each program area (e.g. , parks , public works , water and sewer) in which there are activities funded by CD Block Grants , summarize on a separate sheet of paper: ! (a) the steps that have been taken to identify low- and moderate-income minority needs as they may be greater than those of the low- and moderate-income population in general , and (b) the actions that have been taken to correct conditions which may have limited minority participation or benefits in the past. . For example, if CDBG funds are used for the development of neighborhood parks and playgrounds, the recipient shall summarize the steps that have been taken to identify the extent to which minority households have access to parks/playgroun.os compared to non-minority households (comparing persons per acre, extent and condition of facilities , etc. ) and if disparities are found, a summary of the efforts underway ! to correct these conditions and assure equal opportunity for minorities to enjoy the benefits of that program area. 3. On a separate sheet of paper, list and very briefly summarize each study funded under Section 570.200 (a)(12) . For each study: (1 ) describe how the activities under cor,sideration relate to the provision of equal opportunities ! in the delivery of facilities and services for minorities and women , (2) describe any actions recommended to correct effects of conditions which may have resulted in limited opportunities for minorities or women in the subject area and, (3) describe actions needed to assure equal opportunity in the future. HUD-4081 ;1 76� - 99 Equal Opportunity 2 (a) . (b) . Parks and Community Center: A comprehensive survey and analysis of recreation facilities throughout the city indicated that those census tracts with high concentrations of low and moderate income families generally had a correspondi.ngl�n 1-hlkgh rate of persons per acre of recreation area. The HCD program has been oriented towards rectifying this situation, and the city has allocated $100, 000 of first year funds, 109 , 000 of second year funds and 209 , 000 of the third year entitlement for the provision of recreation facilities in targeted low-income minority neighborhoods. Projects funded in this area include Oldtown Park, the Bushard Community Center and Oakview Community Center. Area residents have participated in the design of these facilities, and in the case of the recently completed Oakview Center, have been actively involved in the structuring of activity programs and social services . Public Works: Programs funded under this heading are primarily directed towards facilities for the handicapped and the elderly, elimination of flooding and street tree problems. No special analysis of minority problems have been made. Water and Sewer Facilities: The Townlot water project is located in a census tract with a high concentration of lower income persons, but these are primarily elderly. There are no significant concentrations of minority persons in this project area. Assistance to orange County Housing Authority: A Tentant Relations Officer was funded from first and second year entitlements, and has greatly improved housing assistance for low and moderate income miniority persons, and in assuring equal opportunity in the provision of housing. 100 • Equal Opportunity 3. Community Analysis Report: This activity has worked to analyze and document areas of the community which are experiencing blight and deterioration, targeting neighborhoods needing rehabilitation assistance. Although program alternatives presented in this study do not specifically deal with women and minority groups, census data and previous analysis generally indicate a correlation between areas targeted for rehabilitation assistance and high concentrations of low and moderate income minority persons, and female-headed households. Preliminary rehabilitation programs and supportive data provide information relating to the provision of equal opportunity in housing and employment opportunities, and will assist the City in structuring programs directed towards assuring equal opportuni- ties for women and minority groups. 101 Form Approved OMB No. 63-R1524 V-B. Fair Housing (24 CFR 570.900(c) (2)) 1 . By executing the Certificate of Assurance for Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, the recipient has agreed to administer its programs relating to housing and urban development in a man- ner to affirmatively further fair housing. (Activities under this category need not be limited to those funded under CD Block Grants. ) Listed below are areas of particular concern in which specific actions can be taken to provide for greater housing opportunities throughout the locality for minorities and women. For the areas of concern listed below: a. Check those in which studies or actions have been undertaken during the program year. b. On a separate sheet of paper, summarize the specific study or activity and briefly describe the results and recommenda- tions of the study or the effects of the action. As an example, a locality might examine the pattern of multi-family zoning to determine its effect on minorities. The recipient would check "zoning" , and note on the separate sheet that a study was undertaken to determine the effects of current multi-family zoning on minorities. The results of the study could be summarized , for example, "the pattern of zoning tends to further the concentration of minorities in the locality because the bulk of the multi - family zoning is in, or adjacent to, minority communities, rather than located throughout the locality. " If the study recommends actions , such as dispersing multi-family housing, these recommenda- tions must be summarized. Zoning Building Codes Housing Codes X Land Use Planning, Policy and Implementation Development Program Planning. Policy (including Site Selection Policies) , and Implementation X Public Facilities X Housing X Other (Spec if yAssure minority participation iggssisted housing ) 2. Complete Form V-C , "Action to Prevent Discrimination in the Sale, Rental and Financing of Housing , " ( HUD-4072 ) . HUD-4082(1.76) 102 Fair Housing Land Use Planning Policy and Implementation (1) Redevelopment studies: In the initial studies and preparation of a Downtown Redevelopment Plan, a review of the exisiting and projected housing situation in the downtown area was conducted. These studies are directed towards targeting areas for the construction of multi-family housing, and allocating a portion of these for low to moderate income and minority families. e Public Facilities (1) Oakview Community Center: Construction has been recently completed on the Oakview Community Center. The Center provides recreation and community facilities in a neighborhood with a high con4tration of low and moderate income minority persons. The new facility provides a recreation facility as well as a full range. of social service programs. (2) Oakview Day Care Center: Scheduled for construction during the current program year, the Day Care Center will provide preschool facilities in a low to moderate income neighborhood with a high concentration of minorities and female-headed households. Housing (1) Rehabilitation loans: This program, scheduled for implementation during the current program year, provides for housing rehabilitation funds, subsidized loans and self-help programs in low and moderate income neighborhoods, including areas with high concentrations of minority households. Assure Minority Participation in Assisted Housing (1) First and second year funds were utilized to contract with the Orange County Housing Authority for a full-time tenant relations ` officer. The tenant relations officer helped to assure that all members of the community had fair and equal access to the housing assistance program. 103 Form Approved - OMB No. 63-P152 f✓ U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT O V-C ACTION TO PREVENT DISCRIMINATION IN THE SALE, RENTAL, AND FINANCING OF HOUSING GRANTEE NAME DATE PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH November, 1977 Stephen V. Kohler CODE NUMBER OF SPECIFIC ACTIONS TO PREVENT STAFF PERSON REPONSIBLE DOLLAR VALUE DISCRIMINATION UNDERTAKEN DURING PROGRAM YEAR AND/OR CONTRACTOR OF STAFF TIME AND/OR CONTRACT ACCOMPI ISHMENTS (1) (2) (3) (4) Contract with Orange County Housing Stephen Kohler-Planning $10, 000 . 00 Placed minorit Authority to assist low income Denartment--nrange Count households in minority persons. 1975-1976 . Housing Authority-Con- section & tractor housing • Rehabilitationloan program - Stephen Kohler-Planning $100, 000 . 00 Assist minorit targeting rehabilitation assistance Department households in to low income minority persons. home improve- 1977-1978 ments/rehabil- itation PAGE OF PAGES HUD-4072 (9-75) Form Approved OMB No. 63-R1524 V-D . Entrepreneurship & Employment 1 . The grantee is required in the Section 3 Regulations (24 CFR 135 Subparts B and C) to utilize lower income area residents to the greatest extent feasible as trainees and employees and to require contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. a. Is there a method for assuring that the contractors and sub- contractors are meeting the requirements of Subparts B and C, above? X Yes No b. Summarize nn a ¢pnAratp shppt. the results of contractors' and subcontractors ' efforts to utilize project area residents. (Results of recipient efforts are included in V-G-Form 4074. ) 2. The grantee is required in the Section 3 Regulations (24 CFR 135 Subpart D) to award, to the greatest extent feasible, contracts for work in connection with CDBG funded projects to business con- cerns located within the Section 3 covered project area or business concerns owned in substantial part by persons residing in the Section 3 covered area; and to require contractors and subcontrac- tors to do likewise. Grantees, recipients, contractors and sub- contractors are required to develop an Affirmative Action Plan (AAP) for utilization of eligible Section 3 businesses. a. Has an affirmative action plan for the utilization of Sec- tion 3 businesses been developed? Yes x No Plan is presently being developed b. Does the plan include a method for assuring that each Con- tractor and Subcontractor has developed and is implementing any AAP for the utilization of Section 3 businesses? Plan is presently being developed Yes x No C. Summarize on a separate sheet, the results of contractors ' and subcontractors ' progress in utilizing Section 3 businesses, i .e. , number and dollar amount in relation to total amount. (Results of grantee efforts are included in v-G Form 4074 . ) 3. The grantee is encouraged in Federal Management Circular 74-7, Attachment A, to utilize minority banks for demand and/or time accounts. Are there any minority owned commercial banks in the locality? No Minority savings and thrift institutions? No. If yes,�havW rantee accounts been opened in any of these insti- tutions. Describe briefly. 1 HUP-4083 (1.76) 1 105 Enterpreneurship and Employment 1 (b) Projects have all required contractors with specific abilities which, combined with short construction times, have precluded training and utilization of area residents. Contractors have been required to employ area residents where possible and feasible. 2 (a) The City Personnel Department is presently developing on affirmative action plan for the utilization of section 3 businesses to submit bids on projects. 2 (c) Specialized nature of work, and lack of section 8 businesses in locality precluded utilizing section 8 businesses and contractors. 106 Farm Approved OM0 No.63-R152e NAME OF CITY UVS.DEPARTMENT Of HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT - HUNTINGTON BEACH V-E TITLE I ASSISTED PRIME CONTRACTS OVER $10,000 DATE JULY 1975 - DECEMBER 1977 November, 1977 AGENCY OR UNIT Of GOVERNMENT (Specify perwd cowredj HCD DIV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER OUESTIONS ABOUT THIS FORM HUD GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER STEPHEN KOHLER B-78-iKC-06-0506 SPECIFY TYPE OF WORK W SPECIFY DOLLAR VALUE OF CONTRACT IN ) f ¢ DATE UNDER THE APPROPRIATE APPROPRIATE COLUMN ELIGIBLE COLUMN U M NAME OF CONTRACTOR OF SECTION 3 COMPETITIVE MINORITY FEMALE iI Z AWARD OVER$10.000 $100.000 BUSINESS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONSTRUC. SUP- SER- O YES NO TION PLIES VICES U UN DER f100,000 OR MORE (1) (2) (31 (4ai (4b) (5) (6a/ (6bl (7/ (8) (90) (9b) (90 Urban Projects, Inc Redevelop . /3/ 35, 000. 00 X ment Plan 10850 Wilshire Blvd. re a atio 3 L.A. CA. 9002476 I 4 N-D-L Const. Co. Const uctj P.O. Box 2365 8/76 29,673 . 00 I X 4Waterac a ps La Habra, CA. 5 Kordick & Sons, Inc. 9/27 706 ,629 . 19 P.O. Box 16485 76 (300, 000 HCD X Speini 1 o ConstrCo. y 2 100 Riverside Avenue 1/76 (50, 00 H Coronodo CA. 76 (50, 000 HCD) XOng 1 Orange County Housing 12/9 10 , 000. 00 ' X Assi tant Authority 75 I I I er 6 R.L. Stelrecht 10/2 / Constr uctl 116521 Graham St. 76� 63,658. 00 X ommun' tylCent r II I 92649 I I ' CUMULATIVE TOTALS �196,127 . 00 s 706 . 629 .19 ( -1 4:5 I HUD-4073;9+75' PAGE _ --_CF 2 —PAGES .1 0 OD Fwm Appr...d OMB N..&3-R1524 NAME OF CITY UNS.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT • Huntington Beach V-E TITLE I ASSISTED PRIME CONTRACTS OVER $10,000 DATE November. 1977 JULY 1975 - DECEMBER 1977 AGENCY OR UNIT OF GOVERNMENT (SPKT(Y Pend covered) H PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS FORM Stephen Kohler HUD GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SPECIFY TYPE OF WORK j SPECIFY DOLLAR VALUE OF CONTRACT IN (� IJI f✓1 UNDER THE APPROPRIATE ? W DATE APPROPRIATE COLUMN ELIGIBLE COLNAN U m NAME OF CONTRACTOR OF W SECTION 3 COMPETITIVE MINORITY FEMALE AWARD BUSINESS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONSTRUC- SUP. 2 Z OVER f10,000 f100.000 SER- U UNDER$100,000 OR MORE YES NO TION PLIES VICES (1) (2) (3) (4a) (46) (5) (6.) (6b) (7) (8) (9e1 (9b) (9c' Robert J. Rodino Assoc 4/18 Comm nits 1047 Gayley Ave. 77 18 ,200. 00 Analysis 7 Suite 201 L.A. CA. t 8 Bebek Const. Co. 10/2 / 606 , 080 ,00 X Storm Irvine, CA, 77 rain 9 Channel Const. Co. 10/2 / torm Irwindale CA. 7 220, 904 . 00 X ewer � I I { i I 214 . . i = CUMULATIVE TOTALS 5 / 32700 �- ►5336131 2 1/ .. >: I 1 HUD4J73 S- o PAGE _ 2—_OF—2--PA5"cS AP63-provRd 1 524 OMB Ho. NAME OF CITY U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Huntington Beach V-F TITLE I ASSISTED SUB-CONTRACTS-OVER $10,000. DATE NoVHnber, 1977 AGENCY OR UNIT OF GOVERNMENT Planning Department July 1975 - D - - hL-r 1 C)77 PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS (SpecEf7 period covered) ABOUT THIS FORM NAME OF CONTRACTOR DATE OF AWARD HUD GRANT IOENTIFICAT N NUMBER Kordick and Sons, Inc. 9/27/76 B_78_ _0 _ SPECIFY TYPE OF WORK > SPECIFY DOLLAR VALUE OF CONTRAC-IN F t[ APPROo?uT E COLUMv ~+ UNDER THE APPROPRIATE`Y :'W I DATE ELIGIBLE COLUMN yU O j F NAME OF SUS-CONTRACTOR OF SECTION) MINORITY FEMALE z i I AWARD OVER S10,000 $100,000 BUSINESS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONSTRUC- SUP- SEA- 0 UNDER 5100.000 OR MORE TK)N PLIES VICES (1J (2) (3) (4a) (4b) f5) (6) (7) (8ai (85i (8c) 1 Fontana Steel Company 9/27/ Storm Drai 17190 Valley Blvd. 76 14,000.00 Steel ork Fontana, Calif. i I i I I - I i I CUMULATIVE TOTALS 514,000.00 5 PAGE 10° 3 PAGES HLID4073 I !375i 0 Fans Approwd OMB No.61-R1521 NAME OF CITY U,B-DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HUNTINGTON BEACH V-F TITLE I ASSISTED SUB-CONTRACTS OVER S10,OW. DATE November, 1977 AGENCY OR UNIT OF GOVERNMENT JULY 1975 - DECEMBER 1977 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS (Specify pemod co—red) ABOUT THIS FORM Stephen V. Kohler NAME OF CONTRACTOR BEBEK COMPANY DATE OF AWARD HUD GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SPECIFY TYPE OF WORK > I I SPECIFY DOLLAR VALUE OF CONTRACT IN I )1 h 1 UNDER THE APPROPRIATE F C APPROPRIATE COLUMN D O � 4 GATE ELIGIBLE � COLUMN w f NAME OF SUB-CONTRACTOR I OF SECTION 7 MINORITY FEMALE AWARD OVER$10A00 $100,000 BUSINESS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONSTRUC- SEfl- V UNDER$100A00 OR MORE TION PLIES VICES (1) (2) (3) (fa) (4b) (S) 1 (6) (7) (8aJ (86) Bc) 1 Century Paving, Norwalk, CA. 37 , 000. 00 Pavin L I 2i Robert B. Longway Hacienda Heights, A. 20,730 . 00 ; Structural i I i I � j I I 1 I i I CUMULATIVE TOTALS $ 71 ,730. 00 $ R ar j a I+ 2 HUD-4073 1 (9-75, PAGE_.OF_ 3 PAJES Fam APpror OMB No.63-RIS2/ NAME OF CITY U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Huntington Beach V-F TITLE I ASSISTED SUB-CONTRACTS OVER S10,OOQ DATE AGENCY OR UNIT OF GOVERNMENT July 1975 - December 1977 Planning Department PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS (Specify period covered) ABOUT THIS FORM St-epben V. Kohler NAME OF CONTRACTOR DATE OF AWARD HUD GRANT IDENTI FICAT I OM NUMBER Channel Construction Company _ _ 0506 > ! SPECIFY DOLLAR VALUE OF CONTRACT IN I I SPECIFY TYPE Of WORK F Q APPROPRIATE COLUMN `� UNDER THE APPROPRIATE 7 u I I DATE ELIGIBLE COLUMN yUl meNAME OF SUB-CONTRACTOR OF SECTION 3 MINORITY FEMALE Z Z AWARD OVER St0A00 StOD,000 BUSINESS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONSTRUC- SUP- SER- U UNDER 1100.1m OR MORE TION PLIES VICES (1) (2) (3) (46) (4b) (5) (6) (7) (891 (8b) (Be) 1 Alcorn Const. Co. 11/8/ 6,230,40 Fencing Sun Valley, Ca. 77 I i 2 iPenhall Const. Co. 1/8/ 15,000.00 Concrete 77 Rem al i I � I I i CUMULATIVE TOTALS $ 92,960.40 5 , # x 2 r I PAGE-.3 OF 3 PAGES HUDA073 1(9-75) N H N N N OMB NO.e3R-1524 NAM[OR ORANT[[ OAT[ PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS FORM HUD GRANT to NO. Cit of Huntington Beach 11 77 IStephen V. Kohler B-78-MC-06-0506 V-G Rec"YAW Employment Title I Recipient departments,agencw,and units of Total Non-Minority Black Spanish-Amencan American Indian Oriental All Other Minorities gOVefnmen[. • «tiiI e• ♦ emal♦ al• Female [Z�:: Female Male F♦m 1. M•e, •ma a Male e A. All Employees es of /Start of ho're. (month/yeer) i. Under$7,500 16 2. $7,500-S9,999 - - - 3. $10,000-S12,499 L} 4. $12,500-$16,000 5. over S15,000 B. Total Number Hired-Start of Program to Date of Report 1 Under S7,500 2 _ 2. $7.500-$9,999 - - �- - 3. $10,000-$12,499 --- _ 4. $12,500-$15,000 5. Owe$15,000 C.Total Number Fired or Resigned(best nete whether fired or resigned)Start of Program to Oat♦of Report 1. Under$7,500 2. $7.500-$9,991 3. 570,000-$12,499 4. Sl 2,500-$15,000 5. Owl$15,000 _ D.Total Number Promoted'(by new salary) Start of Program to Date of Report 1. Under$7,500 r 2. $7,500-$9,999 -- - _ 3. $10,000.$12,499 - - --- --� 4 $12,500-515,000 5. Over S15,000 E. Total Number Section 3 Residents Employed- Stan of Program to Date of Report(Do not include I employees listed under"F ]raining P/ograms/ 1. Under$7,500 2. $7,500-$9,999 3. $10,000 $12,499 4 $12,500-SI5,000 5. Owr$15,000 F. Total Number Entering into Training Programs- Start of Program to Date of Report(Nose/hose 1. Under$7,500 2 57,500.$9,999 --- 3 $10_WO-1112.499 4 S12,500.$15,000 5 Over S15,000 •oon'ot cluds'n-9-1.or me.,t Increse4 H'JDdp?I i Form Approved • OMU No. 63•R1524 VI. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION Except where indicated your responses should reflect experience during the past program year rather than the one for which you are applying. A. As a contact point, identify the city department, organization, agency, • or individual responsible for developing and implementing the Citizen Participation Plan and maintaining the records required by 24 CFR 570.907(b). Name Stephen Kohler Title Housing and Community Development Specialsit Organization City of Huntington Beach • Address 2000 Main Street -- P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 B. 1 . At what point in the development of the application were citizens likely to be affected by community development and housing activities, including low income persons: (a) provided information on the commu- • nity development and housin programs including the amount of funds available (24 CFR 570.900(dq}(1 )(i )) ; (b) afforded an opportunity to articulate needs, express preferences about program activities, assist in the selection of priorities and participate in the development of the application (24 CFR 570.900.(d)(2)); (c) provided information on other important program requirements such as Davis-Bacon, environ- ment, equal opportunity, and relocation (24 CFR 570.900(d)(1 )(iv)) ; and (d) provided bi-lingual opportunities, when appropriate (24 CFR 570.900(d)(2))? (See attached narrative) • • • • HUD•4079 (1.76) • 113 -2- 2. Were meetings, other than formal hearings, utilized? Yes x No If yes, for what purposes? (See attached narrative) 3. In what ways, if any, are the activities described in 1 and 2 above being changed for the next program year? (See attached narrative) C. 1 . When during the planning process, and how often, were public hearings held (24 CFR 570.900(d)(1 )(ii ) )? (See attached narrative) 2. For each hearing held, indicate the purpose. (See attached narrative) 3. Describe any changes planned or actions taken to modify the hearing process for subsequent years' activities and the desired results. (See attached narrative) MUD-4079 (1.76) 114 • -3- D. What provisions have been made for citizen participation in budget and/or program revisions, changes, or amendments (24 CFR 570,900(d) (1 ) (v)? (See attached narrative) • • E. When were citizens advised of HUD's acceptance of your application for processing and of the availability of the application to interested parties (24 CFR 570.300(b) )? (See attached narrative) • F. Cite any key issues relating to your Community Development Program, including the Housing Assistance Plan, where you feel citizen partici- pation was a significant element in the outcome. (See attached narrative) • • • • HUD-4079 (1-76) • VI . Citizen Participation Bl. (a) Due to time constraints encountered in formulating the first year program, the prime mechanisms for citizens participation were a series of public meetings held before the Planning Commission and City Council. Letters of invitation and notification of these meetings were sent to major civic, political, service and social organizations throughout the City, and notifications were placed in all local newspapers advertising and outlining meetings , and encouraging public attendance. Following these initial meetings, another series of public hearings were held to solicit input on the formulation of three-year program objectives. These meetings were also advertised in local newspapers , and notices were included in monthly water bills sent out to approximately 35, 000 households. In the initial stages of the second year program a Citizens Advisory Committee was formed as a means of more actively soliciting citizen involvement in the HCD program formulation process. The Citizens Advisory Committee holds numerous meetings during the program formulation process, and acts to disseminate information regarding the program as well as soliciting citizen input. Meetings are held in HCD target neighborhoods, these meetings acting to inform low and moderate income persons of the program. Information regarding the program, and the amount of funding available , is provided through these meetings, through publi- cations in local newspapers and other public notices, and through community centers. (b) The primary mechanisms for citizen participation are public hearings held before the City Council and Planning Commission, and the Citizens Advisory Committee. Prior to the initial formulation of each year' s program a Citizens Advisory Com- mittee is appointed by the City Council. At the same time, in- formation regarding the program is made available in target neighborhoods, and area residents are encouraged to become actively involved in the citizen committee' s work. The Citizens Advisory Committee holds meetings from August to November each year to review and recommend project proposals and funding allocations to the City Council, and to meet and confer with neighborhood groups regarding the program and the specific needs and problems of neighborhood residents. Other public hearings involving citizens in the program formation process include Planning Commission meetings during which the Citizens Advisory recommendations are reviewed, and City Council meetings which provide a public forum for input and comments on the draft and final applications . 116 • (c) Information regarding important program requirements is provided through local news media, by target neighborhood community center staff personnel, and through regularly scheduled neighborhood meetings held by the Citizens Advisory Committee during the pro- gram formulation process . • (d) Target area neighborhood centers presently have bilingual staff personnel , and these act to provide bilingual opportunities when necessary. B2 . • Meetings other than formal hearings were held by the Citizens Advisory Committee meeting with different neighborhood groupstand the Human Resources Council . These meetings were oriented towards generating a broader understanding of the Block Grant Program, evaluating the problems and needs of local groups and target neighborhood residents , • and soliciting a broader base of citizen involvement. B3 . In the preparation of the Third Year Application, 31 local civic organizations were contacted to advise them of the HCD Program and to encourage staff presentations at their regular meetings . In ad- dition, the Citizens Advisory Committee membership was expanded in the Third and Fourth program years to include not only representatives of local civic organizations but citizens-at-large as well . The Citizens Advisory Committee met eight times during the Fourth Year Application formulation and six times for the Third Year program, while there were only two meetings during the preparation of the second year application. Cl. After the Citizens Advisory Committee completes their review of the Community Development Program, and makes recommendations on the Community Development Budget, a public hearing is held before the Planning Commission, and two public hearings are conducted by the Council. C2 . • The purpose of the Planning Commission public hearing is to allow the Commission to review the recommendations of the Citizens Advisory Committee and hear comments on the draft Housing and Community Development Block Grant Application. • The first City Council public hearing is intended to provide a forum for public comments on the draft application. The second City Coucil public hearing affords the Council the opportunity to consider the Citizens Advisory Committee ' s recommendations , Planning Commission review, and all public input before approving the final application. • • 117 (D) . With the exception of increased participation by the public through the Citizens Advisory Committee, there are no plans to significantly alter the public hearing process for future grant applications . To date, the City of Huntington Beach has made only minor adjustments to past year ' s Community Development Program. Each of these amendments has constituted less than 10 percent of any years ' entitlement . Therefore, no HUD review of these amendments has been necessary, how- ever, each of these amendments has been approved by the City Council at a public meeting in an effort to allow the community at large to be aware of, and have the opportunity to comment on, Community Development Program amendments. (E) • Through the publication of the environmental review documents the public is made aware that the current year Housing and Community Development Block Grant Application is available for distribution. (F) , As a direct result of citizen participation through the Citizens Advisory Committee, and public hearings before the Planning Commission and Citv Council, the Housing Assistance Plan was amended to include a goal of 185 Section 8 new construction housing units for the elderly. Senior citizens also expressed their desire for improvements to the Senior Citizens Recreation Center and $50 , 000 was included in the Second Year Community Development Budget to finance these improve- ments. This open citizen participation is a significant element in the outcome of the Housing and Community Development Program. 118 FOURTH YEAR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE NARRATIVE REPORT The Housing and Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee received 29 applications for HCDA funds from a variety of interest groups. The Committee hereby makes known its reasons for not including on its prioritization list the following applications: 1. Street Lighting (Oakview vicinity) Department of Public Works Cost: $1, 400, 000 The project would have used all of the City ' s 4th year HCDA funds. Therefore, it was declared unfeasible. Further, the Department in- formed us that this and the next two projects should be done after the installation of the Cypress/Ash Storm Sewer . 2. Street Lighting (Oakview Only) Department of Public Works Cost: $100 ,000 * As the result of 1. above being declared unfeasible, the Department submitted a second application for a scaled down project. The Committee was then informed by the Department that an Edison owned system could be installed for free instead with overhead wires and pole hung lights, if the City guarantees maintenance and energy costs (app. $20, 000 per year) for 3 years. Both Citizens and the Department expressed the need for street lights in this area, in part to deter crime. The Committee recommends that the Council request the Department of Public Works to negotiate with Edison for the timely installation of overhead lights. This Committee also recommends that the City determine after some appropriate period of time (1-2 years) the effect on crime of the Edison lights. If warranted, the Committee recommends for 6th year funding a first class lighting system. 3 . Oakview Street Improvements Department of Public Works Cost: $300, 000 As stated in 1. above, this work should be done after the installation of the Cypress/Ash Storm Sewer. Further, existing right-of-way problems need to be resolved. This Committee also determined that the call for HCDA funds to do this work resulted from the City' s not collecting fees for said improvements from developers during past years. We have been informed by the Department that this policy has now changed - fees will be collected. We recommend that after installation of the sewer and resolution of right-of- way problems, that this project be funded by fees collected augmented by HCDA funds. 4. Senior Citizen Mobile Home Park Council on Aging Cost : $300, 000 The Committee ' s decision to omit this project was based on: a) lack of specific site; b) lack of guarantee that funds could be expended during program year; c) questionable eligibility; and d) need for a study to determine the best way to utilize HCDA funds to provide housing for seniors. 1 ? � Page Two 5 . Marina Center/Library Recreation, Parks and Human Services Department Cost: $500 , 000 Not eligible. This project does not meet the "maximum feasible priority for low- and moderate-income families" criteria of HUD, which requires that at least 50% of residents be of low-income. Feasibility. Project is feasible to implement if it were eligible . 6 . Oakview Juvenile Diversion Foundation for Educational and Behavorial Therapy Inc. Cost: $52 ,000 Although the Community and this Committee supports this and the next two projects and recommends their future funding, they are Not eligible. The revised "Consolidated Block Grant Regulations" stipulates that any services must document previous unsuccessful application to federal or State agencies, that normally provide funds for such services . No such previous application exists for these services , therefore, this is not an eligible activity. 7. Oakview Juvenile Diversion Foundation for Educational and Behavorial Therapy Inc . Cost: $26, 000 8 . Oakview Liaison Person Oakview Community Cost: $15 , 000 9. Community Swimming Pool Recreation, Parks and Human Services Cost: $328, 600 Not eligible. This facility will provide for swimming classes at the Oceanview High School and as such will constitute an education facility and is specifically exempt under the HCD Program. It would also provide a community-wide facility and would more than incidentally be used by residents from neighborhoods other than the one in which it is located and is also exempt for these reasons. 10 . Murdy Center Addition American Association of Retired Persons Cost: $50, 000 Not eligible. The subject area is not an HCD Target Area and the tract does not meet the "maximum feasible priority for low- and moderate income families" criteria of HUD. The following were submitted by the Library, but were declared ineligible. 11. Place-a-book $50, 000 12 . Mail-a-book $50, 000 14 . Cart-a-book $30, 000 i20 Page Three Comments to be included with recommended project: 1. Main Street Village. This Committee would like to see the Downtown • area cleaned up and rehabilitated. Therefore, we recommend the ex- penditure of these funds to improve the area' s infrastructure without precluding any potential design. Furthermore, we recommend the ex- penditure of 5th and 6th year HCDA funds, as appropriate , to continue this work. • 2. Neighborhood Preservation Program. This Committee recommends the expenditure of 5th and 6th year HCDA funds to maximize the benefits of this program. 3. Oldtown Storm Sewer. This Committee was informed by the Department that funds for this project will be forthcoming from the City. • 4 . 17th and Orange Traffic Signal. This Committee understands seniors in this area have higher priority needs than this signal. They stated that flooding in the area is a severe problem. 5. Computer Aided Medical Dispatch System. This Committee suggests that: • a) the Fire Department utilize existing City-owned terminals to start this program; b) that the cost of the terminal is excessive; and, c) that the Department first institute the other two programs, Smoke Detectors and Vial-of-Life, recommended for funding. 6. Lake Street Fire Station. This Committee recognizes the need for a new fire station to replace the existing. we recommend a plan be created for this station using 5th year HCDA funds, hopefully after the Lake Street widening issue is resolved. 7. Oakview Center Recreation Improvements. The input of local residents at the Committee' s meeting at the Oakview Center indicated the need for • play areas for small children, a back-board, and family recreation facilities to improve the outdoor recreation opportunities at the Center. The Committee recommends that these suggestions be incorpor- ated in the final plan for these facilities. 8. Newland House. To help the Newland House to become self-sufficient • and to promote historic preservation, this Committee recommends the allocation of $25 ,000 for the provision of a parking lot. Further- more, the Committee recommends that the uncommitted $6 ,000 from the fourth year entitlement be allocated to the Newland House for struc- tural or interior improvements. 121 �30 HOL)SING AND C(DvlelV"ITYDEVELOPMENT m ' PRIOG�RAM FOLRTH YEAR APPLCKTION CITY OF RNTNGON BEPCH JANlV�2Yj 1478 �,gv / t L'oyf v�o HOUSING AND COMMUNITY Alft DEVELOPMENT gap PROGRAM KMH YEAR APPLICKTION CITY OF HUNTINGION BD4CH JANUARY, IM • • CITY OF HunTmGTon BEACH DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES • �_ P. O. BOX 190, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92648 (714) 536-5271 # J TO: Floyd G. Belsito, City Administrator FROM: Edward D. Selich, Planning Director DATE: January 30 , 1978 SUBJECT: FOURTH YEAR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION ANALYSIS: • Transmitted herewith is the City's Fourth Year Housing and Community Development Block Grant Application as adopted by the City Council on January 16, 1978. This document in- cludes the ten project, $1, 259,600 Community Development Program and the Housing Assistance Plan. • The Application has been submitted to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the State of California for their 45-day review period and will, upon receipt of their respective comments, be submitted to the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for their 75-day review. The City should receive approval of the Application by early July, 1978. FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Housing and Community Development Program. Respectfully submitted, Edward D. Selich Director EDS:SVK:gc i • RESOLUTION OF . ADOPTION m huntington beach planning department • RESOLUTION NO. 145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOP- MENT PROGRAM AND HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN AND AP- PROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 77-131 WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Development Act was adopted by Congress and signed into law by the President in October, 1977 ; and 0 The purpose of this Act is to develop viable urban com- munities by providing decent housing, a suitable living en- vironment , and expanded economic opportunities principally for low and moderate income families ; and Grant assistance is provided under the Act for community development activities which prevent or eliminate slums and blighted conditions , and assist low and moderate income fami- lies ; and The City of Huntington Beach is entitled to $1 . 259 million of said assistance this year; and Application for this entitlement money must include a Community Development Program and a Housing Assistance Plan ; and After a series of citizens meetings and consultation among city departments , these two documents have been formulated; and The City Council , after giving notice as prescribed by law, has held a public hearing at which said Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan were duly considered, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that the Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan are hereby approved and adopted for submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for funding under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1977 , and Negative Declaration No. 77-131 is hereby approved. MT:ps 11 1 . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16tt, day of January , 1978 . w Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attor K T REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED: ity Administrator Planning irector 2 . iii Res. No. • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) •�: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the • City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council • at a regular _ meeting thereof held on the 16th day of January 19 78 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: • Bartlett, Pattinson, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder NOES: Councilmen: None • ABSENT: Councilmen: None City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City . of Huntington Beach, California The foregoing instrument is a correct copy of the original on file in this office. Attest . ✓= 19 2 City Clerk and Ex-off icio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, Cal. BY Deputy iv . U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ASSURANCES The applicant hereby assures and certifies with respect to the grant that: (1) It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant,and to execute the proposed program. • (2) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act a resolution, motion or similar action authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and designating the authorized representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be required. (3) It has complied with all the requirements of OMB Circular No. A-95 as modified by Sections 570.300(c) (tor entitlement applicants)or 570.400(d)(for discretionary applicants)and that either • 0) any comments and recommendations made by or through clearinghouses are attached and have been considered prior to submission of the application;or (ii) the required procedures have been followed and no comments or recommendations have been received. (4) Prior to submission of its application,the applicant has: U) provided citizens with adequate information concerning the amount of funds available for proposed community • development and housing activities,the range of activities that may be undertaken,and other important program requirements; (h) held at least two public hearings to obtain the views of citizens on community development and housing needs; and (iii) provided citizens an adequate opportunity to articulate needs, express preferences about proposed activities, assist in the selection of priorities,and otherwise to participate in the development of the application. (5) Its chief executive officer or other officer of applicant approved by HUD: (i) Consents to assume the status of a responsible Federal official under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 insofar as the provisions of such Act apply to the applicant's proposed program pursuant to 24 CFR 570.603; and (ii) is authorized and consents on behalf of the applicant and himself to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts . for the purpose of enforcement of his responsibilities as such an official. (6) The Community Development Program has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low or moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight.Where all or part of the community development program activities are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency, such needs are specifically described in the application under the Community Development Plan Summary. . (7) It will comply with the regulations, policies,guidelines and requirements of Federal Management Circulars 74.4 and 74 7,as they relate to the application,acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted program. (8) It will administer and enforce the labor standards requirements set forth in Section 570.605 and HUD regulations issued to implement such requirements. (9) It will comply with all requirements imposed by HUD concerning special requirements of law,program requirements, and other administrative requirements approved in accordance with Federal Management Circular 74-7. (10) It will comply with the provisions of Executive Order 112%,relating to evaluation of flood hazards. (1 1) It will comply with: 0) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352)and the regulations issued pursuant thereto(24 CFR Part 1). which provides that no person in the United States shall on the ground of race,color,or national origin,be excluded from participation in,be denied the benefits of,or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any r program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and wiII immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this assurance. If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the applicant,this assurance shall obligate the applicant, or in the case of any transfer of such property,any transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. (ii) Title Vill of the Civil Rights Act of 1%8 (P.L. 90.284)as amended, administering all programs and activities relating to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing;and will take action to affirmatively further fair ho+tsing in the sale or rental of housing, the financing of housing, and the provision of brokerage services within the applicant's jurisdiction. V HUD-7015.12(t i-75) r (iii) Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and the regulations issued pur..aant thereto (24 CFR 570.601). which provides that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of rare, color, national origin or sett, be excluded Isom participation in,be denied the benefits of,or be subjected to discrimination under,any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Title I funds. (iv) Executive Order 11063 on equal opportunfty in housing and nondiscrimination in the sale or rental of housing built with Federal assistance. (v) Executive Order 11246.and all regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CFR Part 130),which provides that no person shall be discriminated apinaa on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national orlgm in all phases of employment during the peyformance of Federal or federally - assisted contracts. Such contractors and subcontractors shall take affirmative action to insure fair treatment in employment, upgrading,demotion, or transfer; reerultmena or recrultracesal LIvertising; layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training and apprenticeship. (vi) Section 3 of the Housing and Urban evelopment Act of 1968,as amended,requiring that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities for training and employment be given lower income residents of the project area and contracts for work in connection with the project be awarded to eligible business concerns which are located in, or owned in substantial part by,persona residing in the area of the project. (12) It will: 0) In acquiring real property in ca nnection mith the com mmily development block grant program,be guided to the {neatest extent practicable urakv eta roux. by the real property acquisition policWs set out under Section 301 or the Uniform Relocation Asaizte=e geed Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970(P.L.. 91-646)and the provisions of Section 3022 them-d- (6) Pay or reimburse property oe+ners for necessary expenses as specified in Section 303 and 304 of the Act;and (iii) Inform affected persons of the benefits,policL-s,and procedures provided for under HUD regulations(24 CI-R Part 42). (13) It will: (i) Provide fair and reasonable relocation payrrraaams and?assistance to accordance with Sections 202,203.and 204 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Deal Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and applicable HUD regulations(24 CFR Part 42). to or for Families,individuals.partnerships,corporations or associations displaced as a result of any squisition of real property for an activity assisted under the program; (ii) Provide relocation assistance prograrns offering the services described in Section 205 of the Act tb such displaced families, individuals, partnerships, corporations or associations in the manner provided under applicable HUD regulations; (iii) Assure that, within a reasonable time prior to displacerrmt,decent,safe,and sanitary replacement dwellings will be available to such displaced families and individuals in accordance with Section 205(c)(3)of the Act,and that such housing will be available in the same ravage of choices to all such displaced persons regardless of their race, color,religion,national origin,era,or source of income; (iv) inform affected persons of the benefits,policies,and procedures provided for under HUD regulations;and (v) Carry out the relocation process in such a manner as to provide such displaced persons with uniform and consistent services, including any services required to insure that the relocation process does not result in different or separate treatment to ouch displaced persons on account of their race, color, religion, national origin. sex,or source of incomz. (14) It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themttaves or others,particularly those with whom they have family, business,or other ties. (15) it will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limit the political activity of employees (16) It will give HUD and the Comptroller General through any authorized representative access to cad the right to examine all records,books,papers,or documents related to the grant. Vl • • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH • HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1977 • The participation of the following members of the Housing and Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee is gratefully acknowledged. • • Willis Dean Albright Richard Arthur Altimari Susan Daisy Betts Barney B. Cohen • Thomas Joseph Cooper Karl Cornell Ruth Finley James Gordon Herip Alan Kennedy Isabelle Kirchoff Betty A. Mignanelli Joseph J. Milkovich • John Howard Moser, Jr. Henry LeMay Paradis Brenda Premo Michael Edward Rodgers John Stern Aft 1 lip vii ; PREFACE This document contains the federal application prepared by the City of Huntington Beach for Fourth Year Housing and Community Develop- ment Block Grant Funds of $1 .259 million as authorized under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1977 . Also included herein is the Community Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan for 1978 and the documentation necessary for the federal application . The assistance of the Southern California Association of Govern- ments (SCAG) in the preparation of this application is gratefully acknowledged. Aft viii 1 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FOURTH YEAR HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS City Council Transmittal i Resolution of Adoption & Assurances ii Citizens Advisory Committee Membership vii Preface viii Table of Contents ix List of Tables xi List of Figures xii 1. Community Development Program Summary 1 1.0 The Housing & Community Development Act of 1977 4 1.1 The Community Development Application 5 1. 2 The First, Second & Third Year Program 6 1. 3 Citizen Participation 8 2 . 0 Formulating the Community Development Program 10 2 . 1 Statement of Community Needs 11 2. 2 Long-Term Objectives 11 2 .3 Short-Term Objectives 11 2 .4 Criteria for Third Year Program 11 2. 5 Community Development Projects 11 Exhibit. A: Statement of Community Needs 15 Exhibit B: Long-Term Objectives 18 Exhibit C: Short-Term Objectives 20 Exhibit D : Recommended Projects for Fourth 22 Year Entitlement Exhibit E: Recommended Projects for Fifth 23 and Sixth Year Funding 2 . Housing Assistance Plan Summary 24 1. 0 Introduction 26 1 . 1 Contents of the Housing Assistance Plan 27 1. 2 Assisted Housing Funding 2.7 ix TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 2. 0 Condition of the Housing Stock 29 3. 0 Housing Assistance Needs of Lower Income 32 Households 3. 1 Sound Housing/Rent Gap Analysis 32 3.2 Impacted Groups 34 3. 3 Anticipated Future Assisted Housing Needs 35 4. 0 Specified Realistic Annual and 3-year Goals 38 for Assisted Housing 5. 0 Location of Assisted Housing Units 43 3. Environmental Assessment 49 1. 0 Program Description 49 2. 0 Environmental Setting and Impact 51 4. Appendices 54 Appendix A: Federal Application 54 Appendix B: Third Year Grantee Performance Report 73 Appendix C: CAC Narrative Report 119 Appendix D: Letters of Comment x LIST OF TABLES 2-1 Survey' of Housing Conditions 30 �-2 Substandard Housing Units Suitable for 31 Rehabilitation 1977 2-3 Housing Supply/Demand Distribution 33 2-4 Housing Assistance Plan: Senior Citizens , 1977 36 2-5 Housing Assistance Plan : Large Families , 1977 37 2-6 Housing Assistance Plan: Housing Unit 41 Allocations , 1977 2-7 Housing Assistance Plan: Three Year Housing Unit 42 Allocations r lip r . r xi / LIST OF FIGURES 1-1 Housing and Community Development Target 3 1 Neighborhoods 1-2 Location of Fourth Year Projects 14 2-1 Vacancy Rates 44 1 2-2 Concentration of Families with 65+ Head of 45 Household and less than $5, 000 Income 2-3 Concentration of Families with 65+ Head of 46 Household and less than $10, 000 Income 1 2-4 Concentrations of Handicapped Persons 47 2-5 Census Tracts with High Concentrations of 48 Very Low Income Families 1 1 1 1 xii / COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Aid:,1--:* -- 7 huntington beach planning department SUMMARY This document represents a preliminary fourth-year Community Develop- ment Program. It is in response to the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1977. The Act entitles the City of Huntington Beach to receive $4. 7 million over a six year period for projects designed to prevent or eliminate slums and blight, assist low and moderate income families and meet urgent • community development needs . For the last two years the City ap- plied for and received entitlements totaling 2. 3 million. The first, second and third year Community Development Programs identified community development needs, developed long term objectives designed to meet those needs, specified short term • community development objectives that would be accomplished within the first three years of the Housing and Community Development Act, and proposed specific projects for funding during the first three program years. This document contains the fourt-year Community Development . Program. It is intended that this program continue to meet the community development needs, and long and short term objectives identified in the previous years ' programs. It also proposes additional projects that will be funded by the fourth-year entitle- ment of $1. 259 million. . This report outlines the provisions of the'1977 Act as they apply to Huntington Beach and explains the process used to formulate the City's preliminary Community Development Program. (The Housing Assistance Plan, also required by the Act, is discussed in a fol- lowing section of this document. ) A major requirement of the application procedure is citizen par- ticipation and to meet this criterion as well as to ensure that the Community Development program ultimately adopted reflects the needs and .desires of the public, the City relied on the findings of various staff investigations supplemented by public meetings. However, in an effort to expand the role of citizens in formulating the Community Development Program, the City Council .appointed a Citizen Advisory Committee. The Committee, representing a variety of organizations , conducted public meetings to obtain ideas from citizens and other organizations. The Committee then evaluated City Staff and citizen input. Its efforts culminated in the presentation of a recommended fourth-year program. This recommended ' program, along with recommendations of City department heads and Human Resources Council underwent public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council and resulted in the Community Develop- ment Program adopted by the City Council on January 16 , 1978. Specifically, this ten project, $1. 259 million program adopted by the City Council is designed to accomplish these objectives: � 1 1. Meet important community needs that might otherwise be neg- lected because of inadequate financial resources. 2. Comply with federal criteria by presenting a balanced program addressing the problems of blight, the plight of low income residents and community development needs . 3. Avoid committing the City to activities that will add long-range costs to the already burdened financial structure. The adopted projects are explained and analyzed in Section 2. 5 and outlined below: 1. Continued funding for the Neighborhood Preservation/Rehabilitation Loans Program ($250,000) . 2 . Funding for the first year of a three-year project to provide improvements to the Main Street Village area ($271,000) . 3. Continued funding for removal of architectural barriers and other projects to benefit the handicapped ($40,000) . 4. Funds for the construction of Phase III of the Old Town Storm Sewer ($400,000) . 5. Funds to construct the Cypress/Ash Streets Storm Sewer in the Oakview Target Neighborhood ($75, 000) . 6. Construction of outdoor recreation facilities at the Oakview Center ($75,000) . 7. Provision of smoke detectors for households participating in the Neighborhood Preservation Program, or residing in target neighborhoods and elderly and handicapped households throughout the City ($30, 500) . 8 . Provision of an Emergency Medical Information System for residents of target neighborhoods ($5,500) . 9. Unspecified Local Option Activities ($22,000) . 10. Program Administration ($70, 000) . These recommended projects are intended to serve the interest of the community while satisfying the requirements imposed by federal regulations . Should any of these projects be judged unacceptable by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, theCity will have the opportunity to substitute additional projects - such as those listed in Exhibit E. As well, should conditions change during the program' s implementation phase, the City is also per- mitted to reallocate among approved projects or submit new projects to HUD for approval. 2 lip .,.,:....... e5b'.w..x., ♦u'a.tavNan.��'„a.,..,:SX:::..;.:%%.'• .....,..... AQUA o: t : h i t M�HIODEN}S� ,4 2 ....... .:........ ....... ..... ... HER WOW UATER ' :�:Q:• •:T:i ipq S .'t;::'::;::.:}:::::'L: ..:....... ........... ........... .:......... .... .. ....... TAIlFIIT :•:•: ;r' a ,:!:;;t :.v. ,. ,.r° '^t.e.•..�.x.x,..>::�.�%%...t,.c:v.o;.:,..�.:.:»...,�w:w:di,iiiv:.., ...... �':v- .. ... OARNEID TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS �R........>.......v,... A,RKTOWN , 1. oldtown J___-1�-+ ::i$';r 4�oz;:�aaa.v:n .a...,,,.: <ila¢ES:i�Sk.4 'a:u+ aurtz^Hx<n•..:o% ADAMS 2.downtown ti`:aE•, 3«wwr ,S INDIANAPOLIS 3.five pants 4.aakview S. ...................... ATLANTA ..... ..y::.�r.�:B JP .,....... Eye' .: ..`� .. BANNING gW 01-1 ' u° M, X'�y �N✓ y. HE HCD TARGET NEIGHBORHOODS huntington beach planning department 3 1 . 0 THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF -1977 During the decade of the sixties , the Federal Government initiated numerous urban and social development programs to deal with the growing problems faced by cities in America . The Housing and Community Development Act (HCD) , signed into law by President Ford in August, 1974 and renewed by President Carter' s signature in October, 1977 , consolidates these several programs into one "block grant" system designed to facilitate a comprehensive approach to community development . As stated by Congress , the primary objective of the Act is to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing , a suitable living environment , and expanded economic opportunities principally for low and moderate income families , Grant assistance is provided for community development activities that prevent or eliminate slums and blighted conditions , that assist low and moderate income families , or that meet urgent community development needs . Specifically, the Act entitles the City of Huntington Beach to $4 . 1 million over a six year period. Of this amount , 2 .3 million was available to and successfully applied for by the City in the first, second and third entitlement years . The fourth year entitle- ment is $1 . 259 million . These funds , as stipulated by Congress , can be expended for the following types of programs . 1 . eliminating blight and deterioration 4 2 . eliminating conditions detrimental to public health , safety , and welfare 3 . conserving and expanding the housing stock 4 . expanding and improving community facilities 5 . rationally utilizing land and other natural resources 6. promoting neighborhood vitality and diversity 7 . restoring and preserving properties of special interest or significance. The intent of the Act is to encourage physical development. Social services are assigned only secondary importance by the Act under the assumption that alternative funding is available for such projects . As a result , the major emphasis of the Community Development Program must be toward physical development projects even though social service programs are badly needed. The Act specifies that social services are fundable only if they are under- taken in conjunction with physical development or if no other funding sources can be employed . Therefore , the task facing the City in continuing to implement the Housing and Community Develop- ment Act is to maintain a comprehensive program of development activities that meet federal criteria while fulfilling the City ' s evolving housing and community development needs . 1 . 1 The Community Development Application To secure the funds entitled to Huntington Beach under the Housing and Community Development Act , the City must file an application each year with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) . The application consists of two phases : a Housing Assistance Plan (a separate section of this document) and a Community Development CCD) Program. The requirements for the Community Development Program are clearly specified in HUD regulations . Specifically , the CD Program must include : 1. assessment and identification of community development problems and needs ; 0 2 . a statement of long-term objectives to be accomplished over time ; 3 . a statement of short-term objectives to be accomplished within three years ; and 4 t ' S 4. a one-year program to be funded by the City ' s annual entitlement. And lastly, the Community Development program must include citizen input in its formulation. 1 . 2 The First Year Program The City' s first year entitlement was $460 ,000. Citizen and City Staff input resulted in the funding of a variety of projects that were aimed at benefiting low and moderate income families , elimin- ating blight and meeting urgent community development needs . These Projects were approved in the first year and the funding amounts are as follows : 1 . Citizen participation for the second $ 10,000 . year HCD Program 2. Assistance to the Orange County $ 10 ,000 Housing Authority for a Tenant Relations Officer 3. Community Analysis Project $ 20,000 4. Upgrade substandard water facilities $ 50,000 in the Townlot Area 5. Funds for substandard lot preliminary $ 89,500 redevelopment studies for the Downtown area 6. Wheel chair ramp installation $ 50,000 7 . Senior citizen van , recreation $ 25 ,500 equipment and facility renovation 8. Community Center or park for depressed $100,000 areas and/or Old Town 9. Swimming facilities for the handicapped $105 ,000 As previously mentioned , the application for these funds must include a Housing Assistance Plan. The initial plan submitted in the first entitlement year cited a need for approximately 6 ,525 low income housing units . While the City requested 330 assisted housing units , it was allocated only 144. As of December, 1976 , fifteen units had been leased to very low income families. The Second Year Program The City ' s second year entitlement was $690 ,000. Again , through the process of citizen and staff input the following projects were 6lip selected to benefit low- and moderate-income families , eliminate blight , and meet urgent community needs : 1 . Construction of Community Center and $109 ,000 Human Service Center to be operated by Boy ' s Club at Bushard school site 2. Expansion of handicapped pool and $110,000 community swim complex at Ocean View High School 3 . Assistance to the Orange County $ 10 ,000 Housing Authority for Tenant Relations Officer 4. Outdoor recreation facilities for Senior $ 50 ,000 Citizens Center 5. Storm drain project, Delaware Street, $300 ,000 Adams to Yorktown 6 . Loan to Human Resources Council for $ 38 ;000 Day Care Center 7 . Loan to Redevelopment Agency for $ 30,000 architectural , engineering and consulting activities for Downtown Project 8. Shamel ash tree removal project $ 43 ,000 The second year application included the required Housing Assistance Plan . The corrected version of the HAP (as submitted to HUD on July 14, 1976) documented that 8 ,253 households required housing 0 assistance. The City ' s goal for assisted Section 8 existing units was 617 , but the City received an allocation of 335. As of January 1 , 1977 , approximately 228 of these units were under lease to low- and moderate-income families . The Third Year Program 1 The City ' s third year entitlement was $1 . 233 million . The following projects were selected for funding with the third year entitlement and in addition $285 ,000 of previous years ' project were reprogrammed to third year activities : 1 1 . Local Option Activities $ 24,950 2. Construction of Old Town Storm Sewer $300 ,000 Phase II 3 . Acquisition of a site for Senior Citizens $250,000 1 Housing 7 1 4. Additional funding for construction $205 ,300 of Bushard Community Center 5. Construction of 3 ,000 sq . ft. addition to $105 ,000 Senior Citizens Recreation Center 6. Construction of a Day Care Center at Oak $165 ,000 View 7. Additional Handicapped Mobility Projects $ 43 ,500 8. Initial funding of the Neighborhood $100,000 Preservation/Rehabilitation Loans Program 9. Station wagon and Bilingual Training for $ 12 ,500 Oak View Center 10. Provision of exercise and physical $ 20,000 therapy equipment for the elderly and handicapped at City Gym . 11 . Construction of Del Mar Storm Sewer $200 ,000 12 . Code Enforcement Program for dangerous $ 40,000 buildings in Downtown The third year Housing Assistance Plan documented that 9,640 house- holds required housing assistance. The City ' s goal for Section 8 existing units was 650 units ; however, the total allocation of Section 8 units in December, 1977 was 335. Of these approximately 320 were under lease in December, 1977 and the expected new allocation of 136 units will only accommodate a portion of those qualified households on the waiting list maintained by the Orange County Housing Authority. 1 .3 Citizen Participation . A major requirement of the Housing and Community Development Act is citizen participation in the formulation of the CD Program and Housing Assistance Plan . The intention of the Act is that the programs adopted reflect the needs and desires of the residents of the community. During the first and second entitlement years application process , the City relied on the findings of the Poll Plan , two series of Community Forums and public hearings before bot'i the Planning Commission and City Council for this val_uab_l_e_ _ input. During the third entitlement p g year, the City utilized the General Plan , public meetings and public hearings before the Plan- ning Commission and City Council , the Citizen Advisory Committee , and a community opinion survey to formulate the CD Program. In the fourth year a Citizens Advisory Committee was also used. 8 • The Housing and Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee was formed primarily to increase citizen participation in the formulation of each year ' s community development program. The committee represents a variety of boards and commissions active in Huntington Beach as well as citizens at large. Specifically, the responsibilities of the Citizen Advisory Committee are to : 1 . Hold meetings open to the public to solicit comments and suggestions for community development needs , goals and projects for funding. 2. Review projects submitted for funding consideration by City departments or other organizations . 3. Recommend to Planning Commission and City Council a Com- munity Development Program and Housing Assistance Plan for the annual application . The Citizens Advisory Committee met in three of the HCD Target Neighborhoods to solicit the views of local residents on neighbor- hood needs . Based on the input received at the Citizens Advisory Committee public meetings , the Committee submitted a recommended CD Program to the__P1_an.ni_ng. Comm_i_ssi_on and City Council . Public hearings were held before the Planning Commission and City Council prior to final adoption of the CD Program and H.ousing Assistance Plan on January 16 , 1978 . 1 9 1 2.0 FORMULATING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Receiving direction from citizens and staff, the Housing and Communit Development Citizen Advisory Committee began its task of formulating a ftnal plan . The components of the fourth year ' s CD program are contained in this section and include: 1 . A statement of general community needs derived from citizen input and staff analysis (EXHIBIT A) ; 2 . A statement of long-term objectives derived from citizen input , city staff and previous year ' s applications intended to meet identified community needs (EXHIBIT B) ; 3 . A statement of more specific short-term objectives (also intended to meet identified community needs ) that can be accomplished in three years (EXHIBIT C) ; and 4. Community Development Program projects to be completed in the fourth year with the City ' s $1 . 259 million entitle- ment (EXHIBITS D, E , ) . This section analyzes projects submitted by City departments , citizens , and other organizations against the requirements of the Act, the needs and objectives statements , citizen input , and timeliness . The exhibits include a program 10 • adopted by the City Council as well as a listing of other suggested projects that are appropriate for funding with future years ' entitlements . • 2. 1 Statement of Community Needs The Statement of Community Needs presented in Exhibit A represents the heart of the Community Development Program. Based on the Citizen comments and staff analysis , this statement identifies priority needs in the community. The needs statement outlines a general direction for the City to follow in achieving a better tomorrow; and the objectives and projects contained in the Community Development Program are guided by that directive. 2 .2 Long-Term Objectives • Exhibit B sets forth longterm objectives designed to meet the community needs identified in Exhibit A. These objectives rep- resent achievements to be accomplished over the coming years through the Community Development Program and other City activities . In other words , the longterm objectives are major community goals to be pursued . 2. 3 Short-Term Objectives More specifically, the short-term objectives listed in Exhibit C are designed to make measurable progress towards meeting the City ' s identified needs. They are expected to be accomplished during the next three years of the Housing and Community Development Act. These objectives concern a variety of issues and are intended to define the immediate goals used by the City in formulating its three year plans for this and future HCD program years . 2. 4 Criteria for Fourth-Year Program Of direct concern , however, is the fourth year program. Projects included here will be funded by the fourth year entitlement of $1 , 29-0 million and will be initiated on the approval of the City ' s appli'catton by HUD. The projects scheduled for the fourth year must address identified community needs and objectives and be consistent with the criteria of the Housing and Community Development Act . That is , they must be directed at preventing or eliminating blight , have a maximum feasible priority for assisting low and moderate income families or meeting urgent community development needs . .2. 5 The Community Development Projects Exhibit D presents the Fourth-Year Community Development Program. These projects reflect the highest ranking of the Citizens Advisory Committee and are highly consistent with HUD criteria , community development objectives and needs and are achievable within the time frame of the Housing and Community Development Act. � fir 11 Specifically , the ten project, $1 . 259 million program adopted by the City Council is as presented below. 1 . Continued Funding for Neighborhood Preservation/Rehabilitation Loan Program: This project will provide continued funding for the second year of this program and recommends funding for the fifth and sixth HCD program years . It will provide state operation and financing for approximately 50 loans to low- and moderate-income households . It will also fund a citizen participation program, code inspections and assistance to homeowners for loan applications and planning improvements . ($250,000) . 2 . Improvements to the Downtown Area : This project is the first of a three year program for the comprehensive revitalization of the Downtown area . This year ' s work will include utility improvements in the first two blocks from Pacific Coast Highway along Main Street , landscaping of the Pacific Coast Highway median at Main Street and a resignalization of the intersection of Main and Pacific Coast Highway for better pedestrian safety and accessibility . ($271 ,000) . 3 . Special Projects to Benefit the Handicapped : This project will fund the construction of additional wheel chair ramps throughout the City , purchase of specialized traffic signals and communications equipment for the handicapped as well as a study of other needs of the handi - capped . ($40, 000) . 4 . Construction of Old Town Sewer Phase III : This project will fund the construction of Phase III of the Old Town Storm Sewer (Phases I and II were funded through HCD) to continue the comprehensive revitalization of this HCD Target Neighborhood ($406 ,000) . 5 . Construction of Cypress/Ash Streets Storm Sewer : This project will fund the construction of a storm sewer project on two streets in an identified HCD Target Neighborhood Oak View. This sewer will connect to a collector channel and will substantially reduce the flood hazard in this area . ($95 , 000) . 12 IFIP • 6 . Outdoor Recreation Improvements at the Oak View Center : This project will fund the construction of outdoor play areas • and equipment for small children , landscaping , tables , barbecues , sprinklers , and fencing around the site . ( $75 ,000) . 7 . Provision of Smoke Detectors in Target Neighborhoods : This project will fund the provision of approximately 3 ,000 smoke detector devices for households within the HCD Target Neighborhoods . Households participating in the Neighborhood Preservation Program and other elderly or handicapped households will have a preference for receiving these devices . The Fire Department will instruct households in the use of these devices and assistance in their installation . In addition , the Fire Department staff will also offer counseling on emergency escape procedures for these households . ($30 ,500) . 8 . Provision of an Emergency Medical Information System: This project will be implemented by the Fire Department and t will provide forms upon which target area residents may describe their medical history and special medical problems . These forms are then stored in vials that are stored in the household ' s refrigerator where emergency personnel may locate them . ( $5 , 500) . 9 . Unspecified Local Option Activities : These funds are reserved for allocation to any of the above projects in the event if cost overruns or to newly created projects developed in response to newly identified needs . . ( $22 ,000) . 10 . Program Administration : These funds provide for HCD staff salaries , benefits , overhead and supplies or services necessary to the operation of the HCD Program . ($70 ,000) . i 1 1 13 L -1 -._— '• ' ,Gov f'•�v:i•.� ' :. h; •� w � Neighborhood Preservation Program (All Target Areas) t Smoke Detectors , (All Target Areas) j 1. Wergency Medical Information ;•;(All Target Areas) . X. 4. Cypress/Ash Storm Sewer S. Re(Ceoval of Architectural Barriers itywide) kr>. 6. Main Street Village Improvements 7. Oakview Canter Recreation Improvements 8. Oldt own Store sewer ••� :�;::: 1 •;? I J; NCD Target Areas 1 �N 1 1� W M M wa 1 1 \• I 14 hunt'n g ton beat planning apartment • EXHIBIT A • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY STATEMENT OF NEEDS A-1 Citizen Participation • The participation of local residents (especially those from HCD target neighborhoods ) is key to the success of the HCD Program. Continued and expanded efforts to encourage residents to participate in the preparation of each year' s HCD Program are needed , and residents should be encouraged to organize to meet their own needs and to make those needs known to those who act in the decision-making process . Source : Human Resources Council HCD Citizens Advisory Committee • A-2 Existing Housing Assistance The City shall continue to participate with the Orange County Housing Authority to provide subsidized housing as one mechanism to assist the approximately 6 , 700 renter households requiring assistance . Additional steps should be taken to encourage greater participation by landlords in the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program, and the City shall continue to monitor the operation of the program to assure that it is responsive to the needs of local residents . Source : Department of Planning and Environmental Resources HCD Citizens Advisory Committee A-3 New Construction Housing Assistance Although the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program has been of great assistance to the City ' s renter households , the availability of rental units for rents that do not exceed the fair market rents under Section 8 is diminishing . Therefore , the construction of new sub- sidized or low- rent units for both families and the elderly is needed. Source : Orange County Housing Authority Citizen Comments 15 A-4 Housing Rehabilitation Although much of the City ' s housing stock has been built within the last ten years , there are several older areas that have deteriorated and some newer areas that show early signs of decline. Approximately 1 ,950 units require rehabilitation at this time , and both these units and those showing early signs of decline will need to be improved to preserve this critical segment of the housing stock to help main- tain housing for low- and moderate-income households . Source : SCAG Community Analysis Report , Robert J . Rodino Assoc. A-5 Public Works Improvements All of the HCD target neighborhoods require at least some public works improvements . Street improvements ; lighting ; curbs , gutters , and sidewalks ; storm sewers ; and fire protection facilities are the most frequent needs . However , some areas also require the removal of architectural barriers for the handicapped or other more specialized improvements for pedestrian mobility and access . Source : Department of Public Works Citizen Comments A-6 Downtown Revitalization The downtown area of Huntington Beach developed early in the 1900 ' s and many of the buildings are now unsightly , do not meet current building codes , and house marginal commercial uses . There are also the attendant problems of parking , pedestrian access , and lack of landscaping and street furniture. A comprehensive and coordinated application of all available resources is necessary to correct these problems . Source : Downtown Redevelopment Plan ; Planning Staff Citizen Comments Downtown Merchants Guild Aff a: 16 Y • A-7 Provision of Human Service Needs • Each of the City ' s HCD target areas is unique by virtue of the characteristics of their respective populations . Because of the diverse nature of the neighborhoods , a wide range of human need services and facilities is required , including day care services , social services , counseling and referral , juvenile diversion , health care , senior citizen services , transportation , housing assistance , and • recreation . In target neighborhoods with a community center, these services are coordinated through the center while assisting and en- couraging neighborhood residents to become self-sufficient. Source : First , Second , and Third Year HCD Programs Citizen Comments • Human Resources Council Mayor' s Advisory Committee on the Handicapped Council on Aging • A-8 Provision/Preservation of Recreation and Open Space To fully improve some neighborhoods , it will be necessary to provide recreational open space and/or preserve significant recreational or open space resources . Therefore , acquisition of land and/or purchase of equipment may be required to ensure that these needs of target neighborhoods are met . Source : First , Second , and Third Year HCD Programs i Citizen Comments • A-9 Program Administration As the scope of the HCD Program has increased , the need for a greater commitment to program administration has become evident . Program administration includes compensation to employees assigned to the program and the attendant operating expenses for employee benefits , supplies , and capital outlay items . Program staff must prepare each year' s application and conduct citizen meetings and public hearings , as well as oversee the implementation of approved CD projects . Also there is a need for administrative service to conduct the environ- mental review for projects in each year ' s CD Program. Acak a min R P 17 EXHIBIT B COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY LONG TERM OBJECTIVES B-1 1 . Revitalization of the Downtown Area - Subsequent to the adoption of a plan for the old Downtown Area , which is now being prepared, a series of City initiated actions will be necessary to implement the plan . These actions will probably include (dependent upon the adopted plan) : upgrading of existing or construction of new public facilities , new zoning regulations , code enforcement programs and cooperative efforts between public and private sector interests to foster revitalization . Supports Need (s ) No : A-1 , A-4, A-5 , A-6 , A-7 B-2 2. Provision of Community Services and Necessary Related Facilities to11 Residents . Provision of community services and facilities that are not otherwise available to residents of Huntington Beach , particularly low- and moderate-income families , and the elderly, and the handicapped as well as others in need of such services . Supports Need (s ) No: A-1 , A-5 , A-7 , A-8 B-3 Deterioration - Upgrading program for critical neighborhoods could include : a. Revamp of zoning ordinance to simplify, codify and streamline requirements and particularly , processes . b. Housing code enforcement c. Underwrite , partially or wholly, off-site public improvement in deficient neighborhoods . d . Develop and provide programs relative to housing rehabil - itation , home management , maintenance , budgeting , etc. Supports Need (s ) No: A-1 , A-3 , A-4 , A-5 , A-7 , A-8 Y 18 • B-4 • 4. Impact of Critical Public Works Facilities - a . Improvement of Critical Flood Control and Drainage Facili - ties - Improvement of drainage facilities including upgrading of existing facilities and new construction to bring defic-' ient areas to citywide standards . b. Improvement of Critical Water Facilities - Replacement of outdated or worn out water facilities in older portions of Huntington Beach to bring water service up to citywide standards . • C. Improvement of Street Lighting Facilities in Critical Areas - Upgrading or new construction of street lighting an areas below the citywide standards . d . Street Improvements - including resurfacing , curbs , gutters and sidewalks . • e. Removal of architectural barriers for the handicapped and provision for improved pedestrian mobility and access . Supports Need (s ) No : A-5 , A-6 • B-5 • 5. Provision of Public Facilities in Key Commercial and Industrial Areas. - Public assistance in the development of key commercial and industrial areas by providing , in whole or in part, certain public facilities . Supports Need ( s ) No : A-5 , A-6 , A-8 • B-6 • 6. Provisions of additional subsidized or low-rent units for low- and moderate- income families , the elderly , and the handicapped. Supports Need ( s ) No : A-1 , A-2 , A-3 • AMk 19 EXHIBIT C COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES C- 1 DOWNTOWN/TOWNLOT CT 993. 02 1 . Continued funding for Redevelopment Planning 2 . Institute Code Enforcement Program for commercial buildings and renter- and owner-occupied housing . 3. Initiate rehabilitation loans/grants program 4. Provide self-help rehabilitation training 5. Provision/improvement of drainage facilities 6. Provision/improvement of water and sewer facilities 7. Improvement/provision of streets , curbs , gutters , sidewalks , and alleys . 8. Improvement/provision of street lights and traffic signals 9 . Land acquisition/write-down for senior citizen/ low- income housing 10. Improvements to senior citizens center and T-L-C Program Facility 11 . Provision/improvement of parking facilities 12 . Improve fire protection facilities 13. Support neighborhood organization Supports Need (s ) No : A- 1 , A-3, A-4 , A-5 , A-6 , A-7 C-2 OLDTOWN CT 993-03 1 . Institute Code Enforcement Program for renter- and owner-occupied housing. 2 . Institute rehabilitation loans/grants programs 3. Provide self-help rehabilitation training 4. Provision/execution of drainage facilities 5 . Provision/improvement of water/sewer facilities 6 . Provision/improvement of streets , curbs , gutters , and sidewalks 7. Provision of street lights and signals 8. Provision of open space/recreational facility 9 . Support Neighborhood Organization Program Supports Need ( s ) No : A- , A-4, A-5 , A-8 '% . :.. C-3 OAK VIEW CT 994. 01 • 1 . Institute Code Enforcement Program for renter- and owner-occupied housing. 2. Institute rehabilitation loans/grants program 3. Provide self-help rehabilitation training program 4. Provision/ improvement of water and sewer facilities 5. Provision/improvement of streets , curbs , gutters , and sidewalks 6. Provision of street lights/signals 7. Support neighborhood organization program 8. Institute juvenile diversion program 9 . Institute police rapport program 10. Further the outreach services/facilities for center 11 . Improve recreational facilities at neighborhood center • Supports Need (s ) No: A-1 , A-4 , A-5 , A-7 , A-8 • C-4 BUSHARD CT 993. 15 1 . Support Neighborhood Organization Program 2 . Institute Police Rapport Program • Supports Need ( s ) No: A-1 , A-7 • C-5 HISTORICAL PRESERVATION 1 . Provide parking for the Newland House • Supports Need ( s ) No : A-1 , A-8 C-6 PROJECTS FOR THE HANDICAPPED 1 . Removal of architectural barriers . . Supports Need (s ) No : A-1 , A-5 , A-7 Aft I lip 21 EXHIBIT D RECOMMENDED PROJECTS FOR FOURTH YEAR ENTITLEMENT : $1 , 259 ,000 Project HUD Activity Total Project Other HCD Description Category Cost Funding Allocation 1 . Neighborhood Rehabilitation Preservation Loans $ 700 , 000 $ 100 , 000 $ 250,000 2 . Main St . Village Public Works Improvements Improvements 2 ,292 , 200 0 271 ,000 3 . Removal of Projects for Architectural Elderly & Barriers Handicapped 40, 000 0 40,000 4 . Old Town Public Works Storm Sewer Improvements 200 ,000 300 ,000 400,000 5. Cypress/Ash Public Works Storm Sewer Improvements 95, 000 0 95 ,000 6 . Recreation Facilities at Oakview Public Works Center Improvements 75 ,000 0 75 ,000 7 . Smoke Provision of Detectors Public Services 30, 500 0 30, 500 8 . Emergency Medical Provision of Information Public Services 5, 500 0 5 ,500 9 . Unspecified Local Option Activities -- -- 0 22 ,000 10 . Program Administration -- 70 ,000 0 70,000 $3 ,958 , 200 $400 ,000 $1 ,259 ,000 Adft 22 • EXHIBIT E • OTHER PROJECTS CONCIDERED FOR FUTURE YEARS ENTITLEMENTS HUD Project Title Activity Category Estimated Cost • 1 . 13th St Storm Sewer Public Works $ 400 ,000 2 . Street Lighting Public Works 1 ,400 , 000 3. Oak View St Lights Public Works 100 ,000 • 4. Oak View St Improvements Public Works 300, 000 5 . Senior Citizens Acquisition of Mobile Home Park Real Property 300 ,000 • 6 . Lake St Fire Station Public Works 600 ,000 7. Computer Aided Medical Dispatch System 9 ,200 • 8. Oak View Juvenile Division Public Services 52 ,000 9 . Oak View Liaison Person Public Services 15 ,000 10 . 13th St . Storm Sewer Public Works 200 ,000 11 . Old Town Acquisition of Park Acquisition Real Property 200 , 000 12 . Michael St . Storm Sewer Public Works 175 ,000 13. Traffic Signal Public Works 47 , 000 14 . Newland House Historic Parking Preservation 25 ,000 i 23 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN huntington beach planning department • SUMMARY The Housing Assistance Plan is a required portion of the City of Huntington Beach' s application for funds allocated to it under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1977. A Housing Assistance Plan is an assessment of the City ' s need for assisted housing for lower income households and its plans for providing housing to meet those needs. It is also an attempt to relate community development programs and comprehensive planning to the provision of lower income housing. The Housing Assistance Plan must contain four specific areas of information: (1) an accurate survey of the condition of the existing housing stock; (2) an assessment of the housing assistance needs of lower income persons now residing or expected to reside in Huntington Beach in the near future; (3) specification of a realistic annual goal for the number of dwelling units or persons that will be assisted; (4) and identification of the general locations of any proposed assisted housing. Census and other data indicate that housing in Huntington Beach is generally in very good condition and much of it is owner occupied. Huntington Beach currently has a shortage of 5, 142 dwelling units in the lower income price ranges. Many lower income families are paying more than a normal amount of their income for housing. Of all households in Huntington Beach , 13, 082 have incomes below the federally defined lower income level. Approximately 6 ,500 families fall into the very low income category. Low income senior citizens, handicapped and large families have special difficulties in locating affordable standard housing. HUD has not yet indicated the general range within which the City' s final Section 8 Housing Assistance Program allocation will be. There has been a delay in the allocation of Section 8 units , and the City recently received a total of 136 Section 8 housing units based on the community' s second year Housing Assistance Plan. In addition, several other important factors such as the availability of housing sponsors / and Huntington Beach' s relative need as viewed by HUD , are not clearly defined at this time. However , the City ' s Housing Assistance strategy has grown in scope over recent years . Approximately 185 senior citizens housing units are planned for construction in 1973 , and SCAG has tentatively allocated 100 new family units for Huntington Beach. The City is now implementing the first phase of 1 1 24 a four-year neighborhood preservation program and HCD funds have been allocated for the reduction of the cost (through land improve- ments) of a privately-sponsored project to construct approximately 200 senior citizen dwelling units. Adak 25 1 . 0 INTRODUCTION The Housing and Community Development Act of 1977 imposes several new housing responsibilities on local governments . These include ; It All new federally assisted housing must be provided in conformance with a local housing assistance plan . A local housing assistance plan must be included as part of any development program funded under Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1977. Each local recipient of federal planning assistance under Title IV of the Act is required to carry out a comprehensive planning program that includes a "housing element. " The Housing and Community Development Act of 1977 is directed towards 0 relating community development activities and the comprehensive plan- ing process to the provision of housing assistance for low- and moderate-income families . The housing assistance plan is intended to place increased emphasis on the provision of local housing services , placing program control and implementation directly with local governments resulting in benefits of increased control over the 0 location and nature of housing assistance provided , and parameters of marketing areas served. .rf..: 26 1 . 1 Contents of the Housing Assistance Plan The Housing Assistance Plan must contain information addressing four required areas of consideration . The housing assistance plan must accurately survey the condition of the existing housing stock. The plan must specify the number of housing units currently existing ; the number of units in standard , substandard and deteriorated condition ; the number of vacant and occupied units and the amount of substandard units suitable for rehabilitation . The housing assistance plan must contain an assessment of the housing assistance needs of lower income persons now residing in Huntington Beach or expected to reside in the City in the near future . The survey of housing assistance needs must include special consideration for minority populations , women , elderly and handicapped persons , displaced persons , and large families . The housing assistance plan must specify a realistic annual goal for the number of dwelling units or persons to be assisted . This goal must include the mix of new , existing , and rehabilitated dwelling units , and the size and nature of projects and assistance best suited to the needs of lower income families residing in the community. The housing assistance plan must also identify the general loca- tions of proposed assisted housing , with the objectives of further- ing revitalization of the community , promoting greater choices of housing opportunity , avoiding undue concentrations of lower income persons and assuring the availability of adequate public facilities and services for such housing . 1 . 2 Assisted Housing Funding The Housing and Community Development Act of 1977 , in addition to allocating funds directly to cities for "community development" activities , appropriated funds under several programs specifically addressing housing assistance. The Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development has or will be allocating portions of these housing assistance funds to HUD and FHA Insuring Area offices . This pool of housing assistance funds will be allocated to local communities based on either a formula (fair share) allocation , an approved housing assistance plan , or a combination of both . Private, non-profit , or public lower income housing developers or sponsors may then submit proposals for either new, existing , or rehabilitated housing projects to the HUD area office. HUD will approve or reject a project requesting federal funds based on the annual housing assistance plan submitted by Huntington Beach and approved by HUD upon the basis of available funds . 27 i All or part of Huntington Beach ' s "community development" allocation may also be used to supplement federal housing assistance funds . The manner in which the community development allocation is used is • largely determined by the local government , acting within the para- meters established by the Act . • • Alft i • 28 1 [1 P 2. 0 CONDITION OF THE HOUSING STOCK Housing in Huntington Beach can be categorized as being largely owner occupied and in good condition. This can be attributed to the large number of single family housing tracts that have been constructed and to the fact that the majority of all housing is less than fifteen years old. However, according to the Southern California Association of Governments' revised Regional Housing Allocation Model approximately 324 substandard units exist ' in Huntington Beach and an additional 1, 023 units are suitable for re- habilitation. Aft 29 • • CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN SURVEY OF HOUSING CONDITIONS, 1978 • OCCUPANCY STATUS NUMBER OF YEAR ROUND UNITS AND CONDITION OF OWNER RENTER HOUSING UNITS TOTAL OCCUPIED OCCUPIED • Occupied Units (Total) 56 ,287 37 , 364 18 , 924 Substandard 324 121 203 All Other 55 , 963 37 , 243 18 , 721 Vacant Units (Total) 1 ,158 383 775 Substandard 23 2 21 i All Other 1 , 135 381 754 Total Occupied and Vacant Units 57 ,445 37 . 747 19 , 698 • SOURCE: 1978 Figures from SCAG, based on Regional Housing Allocation Model. • Adft • • Table 2-1 30 1 IRP i C I TY OF HUN-1 I NGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN SUBSTAiNDARJ HOUSING UNITS SUITABLE FOR REHABILITATION 1975 OCCUPANCY STATUS AND OWNER RENTER CONDITION OF HOUSING UNITS TOTAL OCCUPIED OCCUPIED ALL SUBSTANDARD UNITS 324 111 REHABILITATABLE OCCUPIED U14 I TS 9112 250 691 VACANT UNITS 81 7 74 TOTAL SUITABLE FOR REHABILITATION 1023 258 765 SOURCE : SCAG, REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL, DECEMBER 1977, Table 2-2 • • 3 . 0 HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS The requirement in the Housing and Community Development Act of 1977 that the housing assistance plan contain an assessment of the housing assistance needs of lower income households residing in Huntington Beach is an effort to assure that the local government carefully investigate the demand side of the housing problem. It is necessary to look at the components of housing demand in order to understand current conditions and make projections concerning future demand. The identified existing and future need must be known if Huntington Beach is to establish realistic housing assistance goals. 3 . 1 Sound Housing/Rent Gap Analysis The basic technique for determining total housing assistance needs is the comparison of existing supply and existing demand for housing . To conduct a sound housing/rent gap analysis, it is necessary to sort through the housing supply, grouping housing units into appro- priate rent categories. Households then must be grouped into comparable rent paying or home buying ability categories. The dif- ference between the available supply and the demand in a particular rent paying/home buying ability range indicates the need for housing Awl; i 32 'C . Housing Supply 14623 Demand Distribution 13,644 12,878 KEY 11,062 10,903 HOUSING HOUSING DEMAND_ SUPPLY 8,666 (Includes (Sound or household plus Rehabitable) vacancy 6,951 allowance) 6,644 5,712 4,390 2,040 1,741 1,500 163 J Monthly Rent < $75 75-164 165-229 230-279 280-364 365-499 > 500 Capability Home 5,000 14,000 20,000 27,000 37,000 \60,000 Purchase �$5,000 13,999 19,999 26,999 36,999 59,999 / Capability Annual <$3,000 3,000 7,000 12,000 16,000 22,000 >36,000 Income 6,999 11,999 15,999 21,999 .35,999 w w SOURCE: Scag Regional Housing Allocation Model, December 1976 �> lUr_�_P 2-3 r r • r r . All r • in that price range. Table 2-3 displays housing supply and demand in Huntington Beach. Households in income categories above $12 , 000 r (800 of the r.egionwi.de $15 , 000 median income) are not eligible for. housing assistance except for large families in the $12 , 000 to $15, 999 income category. If there are an insufficient number of housing units in the City with four bedrooms and rents of $280 a month or less ($27 , 000 or less for housing value) many large families in the $12 , 000 to $15 , 999 income categories will need assistance. Since the median value of 3 or more bedroom units in Huntington Beach is high (rent - $332, house - $48 , 035) the number of 4 bedroom units valued appropriately for the aforementioned can be assumed to be inadequate. Therefore, housing shortage in Huntington Beach is the difference between the supply and demandin the rent paying/home buying ability ranges with less than $12 , 000 incomes and the number of large families with incomes of $12 , 000 to $15, 000. The total need in Huntington Beach based on the described criteria is 5 , 142 units according to the latest available data. and including the need for additional families which may reasonably be expected to reside in the community. The house values and rents matched up to each income category are based on the sliding scale of ability to pay starting at 30 percent of gross income in the lowest category, going down to 16 percent in the highest category. 3. 2 Impacted Groups t The Federal Government has defined lower income households as those whose total family income is less than eighty per- cent of the median income of the area for a family of the same size. According to 1977 Southern California Association of Governments ' data, there are approximately_ 13, 082 lower income households . : The Federal Government has also defined those households whose total family income is less than fifty percent of the median in- come of the area as very low income families. Of the aforementioned lower income families , approximately 6 , 500 households meet the very low income criteria. �. Several groups of households constitute a significant portion of these lower and very low income households. . Senior Citizens : 1 , 515 elderly households are estimated to have incomes below the lower income level. Approximately 858 of these elderly households fall into the very low income category. The f large number of lower income senior, citizens is especially sig- nificant when it is pointed out that their earned incomes usually decline with age , and their actual incomes are eroded as inflation and housing costs increase. Significant concentrations of Senior Citizens exist in three areas of the City. . Large Families : 4 , 729 families with five or more persons are estimated to have incomes below the lower income level. Approxi- 3 4 1.f l y'.f} mately 78 percent .of these lower income families have incomes at or below the very low income level. Many of these families are living .in overcrowded conditions. . Handicapped Persons: Huntington Beach has one of the largest concentrations of handicapped and disabled persons in Orange County. These persons require specially designed housing that is not available and face many of the same income and housing problems as the elderly. Approximately 920 low income handicapped house- holds have been identified of which 409 live in one or two person households. 3 . 3 Anticipated Future Assisted Housing Needs A three year Housing Assistance Program is required for the 1978 application. Therefore, anticipated increases of lower income households must be considered. Also, in cooperation with other cities in the region, a fair share allocation of lower income groups to each City should be made so that said groups will be dispersed throughout the region rather than concentrated in limited areas. Fair Share Allocation - According to SCAG estimates, Huntington Beach should increase projected housing assistance needs for the third year goal by 1, 869 units. The units should be distributed in the following manner : 783 units in the $ 0 - $ 3 , 000 income range 951 units in the $ 3 , 000 - $ 7 , 000 income range 135 units in the $ 7 , 000 - $12 , 000 income range Future needs through normal growth - By 1978 there will be approxi- mately 16 , 036 lower income households of which 1, 402 will be large families, 2 , 756 will be 65 and over households, and 1, 068 will be handicapped households . Assuming that the present low cost housing stock does not deteriorate and that no new housing is constructed in the low cost range (rent less than $230, house value less than $20 , 000) , a total of 8 , 625 low cost units will be available . This would indicate a need for assisted housing of 7 , 411 units . When fair share allocations and normal growth are considered together, a three year need for Huntington Beach is 9 , 485 assisted units. i 35 I CITY OF HUNTI.NGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLA►i aENIOR CITIZENS (65 OR OVER) , 1977 i INCOME NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS# LESS THAN $3,000 127 $3,000 - $6,999 7) $7,000 - $11,999 657 LOWER INCOME LEVEL $12, 000 - $15, 999 453 $16,000 - $21,999 304 $22,000 - $35, 999 110 $36,000 OR MORE 25 TOTAL 2,393 SOURCE; SLAG REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL, DECEMBER 1976, 1978 REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PUBLICATION . Table 2-4 r r 36 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN LARGE -AMILIES (FIVE OR MORE PERSONS) 1977 INCOME NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS# LESS THAN $3, 000 174 $3,000 - $6,999 3512 $7, 000 - $11, 999 1043 $12, 000 - $15,999 2399 LOWER INCOME LEVEL $16,000 - $21,999 4241 $22, 000 - $35,999 2860 $36, 000 OR MORE 632 TOTAL 14,861 SOURCE ; SCAG REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL, DECEMBER 1976 1978 REGIONAL HOUSING ALLOCATION MODEL FIGURES WERE NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF PUBLICATION . Table 2-5 37 i 4 . 0 SPECIFIED REALISTIC ANNUAL GOAL FOR ASSISTED HOUSING The Housing Assistance Plan must specify a realistic annual goal for the number of dwelling units to be assisted, using Federal or other available housing assistance resources, taking into consid- eration the housing conditions and needs described in the first two sections of the plan. Goals must separately identify the proportion of new, rehabilitated, and existing dwelling untis, and the sizes and types of dwelling units that need to be assisted, taking into account the kinds of assistance best suited to the needs of lower income persons in Huntington Beach. There must be a one-year goal describing planned numbers of assisted units. The year should coincide with the first year program described elsewhere in the Community ,Development Block Grant appli- cation . To provide a longer term framework for the annual goal , applicants are required to prepare the one-year goal within the context of a three year planning period which coincides with the three-year plan prescribed in the application. Goals for new, rehabilitated, and existing units must be consistent with the findings regarding the availability of vacant existing 38 units and of units suitable for rehabilitation. Goals should re- flect the maximum feasible use of the existing housing stock in accordance with generally known data, taking into consideration that HUD priorities for use of the Section 8 Housing Assistance Program emphasize the use of existing housing. The distribution of assis- tance between new and rehabilitated units should be made taking into consideration the objectives of: curtailment of housing deteriora- tion; promotion of neighborhood stability; minimizing detrimental environmental impact; avoidance of undue concentrations of low income and minority group persons; and economic feasibility. Goals for using Section 8 Lower Income Housing Assistance payment must be consistent with the amount of such resources currently available. Generally, it is reasonable to express the housing assistance goals for one year as 10 - 20 percent of total need for the remaining families. Once the goal has been determined in terms of the number of units to be requested, the method of assistance must be determined. The methodology which the City has adopted for achieving the housing assistance unit goals is presented in the following sections. 1. Housing Assistance Plan Implementation Strategy This strategy presents a realistic program directed towards realizing the optimum fulfillment of the Housing Assistance Plan and providing housing assistance to the maximum number of families. This program attempts to fully utilize the resources available to the City, and to structure a compre- hensive housing assistance program. The major facets of this strategy are as follows. A. Current Year and Three-Year Housing Assistance Goals Goals for current year and projected three year housing assistance provide a framework and quantitive direction for the City' s housing assistance program. The City of Huntington Beach has adopted these goals , and has structured assistance efforts to provide the maximum fulfillment of these stated objectives. The Citizens Advisory Committee endorsed the "current year goals" and "three year goals" on November 4 , 1977 . Specific project objectives are directed towards fulfilling these goals and meeting the needs of the community. B. Housing Assistance Projects Based on the quantitative needs presented in the community' s stated goals , field surveys and analysis, staff input, and citizen input as articulated through the Citizens Advisory Committee, the following programatic strategy has been formulated as a means of implementing the City' s Housing Assistance Program. 39 (1) Section 8 : New Construction for Large Families S SCAG has recently given Huntington Beach its highest ranking for the construction of family housing in Orange County. This priority ranking allows for tho new construction of approximately 100 large-family units in the community . This project is presently pending the release of funds from HUD 's central office in Washington. (2) Section 8 : New Construction for the Elderly HUD granted the City of Huntington Beach preapproval for a site on which to construct Section 8 housing for low-income seniors . Preapproval was granted in October 1976 , and in July, 1977 , HUD published a Notice of Funding Availability. Subsequently, the firm of Doty and Associates was selected by HUD for the con- struction of 185 one-bedroom housing units for low- income seniors . The draft EIR for this project has ! been completed, and is presently undergoing review. The Planning Commission will consider the conditional use permit for this project in February, 1978 . Construction is scheduled to begin in Spring, 1978 . (3) Private New Construction of Elderly Housing ! Huntington Beach is now investigating the feasibility of constructing a housing development on the Old Civic Center site in the downtown area. The project will involve the construction of approximately 200 elderly housing units on a publically owned site which has direct access to a wide range of social , educational and recreational services . The Citizens Advisory Committee recently endorsed the proposed use of the site, and request for a proposal is now being prepared. The staff is presently investigating the use of third year HCD funds to underwrite land .improvement on a ! site providing for the construction of 200 Section 8 units to be rented within Section 8 fair market rent limits for leased housing. (4) Housing Rehabilitation Program ! The City' s four-year neighborhood preservation and housing rehabilitation program will be implemented in its first phase during the current program year. This program provides HCD funds for rehabilitation loans and assistance to low to moderate income target neigh- borhoods . This project will also work to alleviate the 0 physical deterioration of certain blighted areas of the City. Acak 0 40 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN HOUSING UNIT ALLOCATIONS, 1971 1 Assisted Assistedl ( a of To- Housing Unit Housing Unit # of Lower tal Lower Need less Need including Income Income Expected to Expected to 1978 Impacted Groups Households Households Reside Reside Goal i { Elderly and 1, 515 11 . 59 533 (1) 554 425 E� Handicapped Large 4 , 729 36. 14 1725 (102) 1827 275 Family Other 6, 838 52 . 27 2497 (264) 2761 450 Families Total 13, 082 100% 4775 5142 1150 1. 5 , 933 assisted housing units are needed. Each impacted group is assigned a need based on its percentage of total lower income households . Source: SCAG Regional Housing Allocation Model, December 1977 Huntington Beach Planning Department 1978 Regional Housing Allocation Model figures were ~ not available at the time of publication. Table 2-6 N CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN THREE YEAR HOUSING UNIT ALLOCATIONS %of Total Additional Modified Three Lower Income Three Year Fair Share Three Year Total Year Households Assisted ' Allocation Assisted Three Percent Goal Needing Housing Housing of Assisted Housing Multi- Year Assign- with Dis- Impacted Groups Assistancel Need2 Housing Need3 plier4 Goal ment5 tribution Elderly and 11.3% 860 211 1071 - - 23.9 575 Handicapped AdW Large Family 29.3 2231 547 2778 - - 22.1 540 Vson Other Families 59.4 4525 1111 5636 54.0 1070 100% 7616 1869 9485 - 1985 100% 2185 1. 1977 Housing Assistance Plan 2. Based on SCAG Regional Housing Allocation Model, December 1977 1978 Regional Housing Allocation Model figures were not available at the time of publication 3. Total of Three Year Assisted Housing Need and Additional Fair Share Allocation of Assisted Housing 4. The multiplier is based on a ten year horizon for eradicating housing need, but modified to allow a continuing increase in families needing aid and therefore an ever extending horizon 5. As is allowable under HUD criteria and based on said criteria, "Percent Assigned" for Large Family has been reduced from the actual percentage of households needing housing assistance. i' Table 2-7 5. 0 LOCATION OF ASSISTED HOUSING UNITS As mentioned earlier, the housing assistance plan must indicate the general locations of proposed housing for lower income persons. These locations must be selected with the objective of : . furthering community revitalization, . promoting increased housing choices for lower income persons and avoiding undue concentrations of assisted housing; . assuring the availability of public facilities and services adequate to serve proposed housing projects. Figure2-1 displays the census tracts deemed most appropriate for the location of assisted housing units and community development projects. The following Figures 2-2 through 2-6, display the factors considered in making this selection including : percentage of lower income households, percentage of minority households vacancy rates, income of elderly households, concentration of handicapped persons , concen- tration of very low income families . UR s L r 43 • s 996. 2 4.65 996. 03 � 1.69 1.65 v99$. 02"'A a9 996. 4 3.04 996 . 0 0 97 . 03 994. s 2.12 12.56 ^' 3.77 1.45 994 . 4.49 994 5 992 . 11 • 94.0 4.7� 994 . 01 2.52 815 157 4.09 3.68 994.02 992. 11 994.0 • 5 2 7 YAAiRI , I 992.13 992.14 992.16 2.78 1.58 6.61 4.55 roaKiOWN AOAM& .1 4 , ..._. .. .... ....:..:>:.><: ,.....,. . fir ;.. 992.18 99 17 11.4f� < ` : 15.15 1.45 MIANA.Is AnANTA 9 43 992.21 y� 12. 6.67 :,: 2.10 KAM110N ,fSc {ANN,HO r, • o .„a- nlo-ice, >.n.r.r Figure 2_] VACANCY RATES (% OF ALL .HOUSING UNITS) 44 census tracts / 1973 special census 0 S t '4y 996.02 997.02 R 996.04 M rAwIN 996.03 996.05 y 997.03 lo. 994.08 994.06 ��� gg4.01 I . 995.01 I. ,, i ���. EE ff Id 994.05 3 1�1I994.07 992.11 r 1L ! vwa,� 994.09 cv 994.04 994.02 rn RMA rn MU" 994.03 aus OAlrflD EM 993.01 64 'i 992.13 f VOQKTOwrt 992.15 992.16 A �!I �w S,4 o o �+ 992.19 992.18 1' t ni NNANANX5 I �f� AIIANfA o Nuo�nber of Households `� �op 51 992.20 NAMl10N 992.21 a� IANNWO Figure 2-2 ` 'qa CONCENTRATION OF FAMILIES WITH 65 ¢ HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD AND LESS THAN $5,000 INCOME t F: census tracts / 1973 special census 45 s 996.02 •,� «� 997.02 Q� 4 S�MJADLIFN . S j 996.03 996.04 � 996.05 997.03 995.01 994.OR ' 994.06 999.07105i jil992.11 994.09 m N .-1 0 994.02 N S A FA a rn � rn ,AM Mi 994.03 ails "It FIfLD 992.14' � !! 993.01 992.13 " i IE„l TOAK TOWN 992.15 992.16 1 ADAMS M `^ 992.19 992.18 N NDIANAFOL6 p2 II I rn �� illl l 92 I },I J 1 ATLANfA O Number of Households � 992.20 NAMITON 992.21 $ANNINO Figure 2-3 yyY CONCENTRATION OF PAMILIFS WITH 65 ¢ HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD ;I AND LESS THAN $10,000 INCOME 46 census tracts 11973 special census � 996.02 a�sA 996.03 997.02 q JI � 90 L M.IN%NN333 996.05 996.041 997.03 TUNO[A 994.08 �I 1994.06 ul-1 jjj,' 9 1 995.01. t3t5 130 I i,:�f94.07, 81 I`t �� II 992.11 1{ 99.O1 'j 994.09 "I�I � `�� i�j�i ji wA,r■ 79 lu 85 90 FLAIR 994.09 994.0211 992.12 �{4 FE iri il' itrr �� 994.03 TSiTS GARFIELD N 993.01 992.13 / 109 -XIOWN 111 AQAMS 99 1 992.19 992.18 Concentratior of Ambulatory a) .�iANATOIIf Handicapped and Handicapped o� �75 'I Receiving Aid to the Disabled 1993.03 ATLANIA O Number of Ambulatory Handicapped992.20 992.21 NAMITON MA"INO x Ficture 2-4 s CONCENTRATIONS OF HANDICAPPED PERSONS census tracts / 1973 special census 47 4 996.02 997.02 � 996.03 � . 996°04 E996.05 997.03 ®NGfA 994.013 994.06 995.01 994.01 994.07 994.05 992.11 �11 N 994.09 C� 34 11 N xAIFA � 111 2G% i � . ;'j994.0 1, WSW 994.03 alis GARFIELD 993.01 992.14 992.16 992.13 rOAAIOWN 992.15 .1f11 i; �iI II ADAMS 993.02 992.18 S84OJ "' 992.19 r+ CN NDIANAWl6 24% +�91_ I AnANTA 4111� ' II I1 992.20 vt NAMIION 992.21 BANNING f Z Figure 2-5 CENSUS TRACTS WITH HIGH CONCENTRATIONS ZU : OF VERY LOW INCOME FAMILIES =r (Over 20% of .Household) _ 48 � - census tracts / 1973 special census ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW huntington beach planning department • • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1 .0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Housing and Community Development Program is funded by the Federal Government under the authority of the Housing and Community Develop- 10 ment Act of 1977 . In Huntington Beach several long-term objectives have been formulated , providing a programatic framework and direction for projects receiving funding under the HCD Act. These objectives provide an overall orientation . for specific projects funded under the Fourth year entitlement of $1 . 2.59 million . 10 The environmental assessment is an evaluation of program objectives and an analysis of the environmental impacts likely to be produced through the implementation of these objectives . The analysis_ of long- term objectives are as follows : Revitalization of the Downtown Area - Su-bsequent to the adoption of a plan for the old Downtown Area , which is now being prepared , a series of City initiated actions will be necessary to implement the plan . These actions will probably include (dependent upon the adopted plan ) : Upgrading of existing or construction of new public facilities , new zoning regulations , code enforcement programs and 1 cooperative efforts between public and private sector interests to foster revitalization . Aft G` 49 1 Provision of Community Services and Necessary Related Facilities to All Residents . Provision of community services and facilities t at are not otherwise available to residents of Huntington Beach , par- ticularly low- and moderate- income families , the elderly , and the handicapped as well as others in need of such services . Projects to upgrade Neighborhoods with Indications of Blight and Deterioration - Upgrading program for critical neighborhoods could include : a. Revamp of zoning ordinance to simplify , codify and streamline requirements and particularly , processes . b. Housing code enforcement. C. Underwrite , partially or wholly , off-site public improvements in deficient neighborhoods . d. Develop and provide programs relative to housing rehabili - tation , home management , maintenance , budgeting , etc. Impact of Critical Public Works Facilities - a. Improvement of Critical Flood Control and Drainage Facilities- Improvement of drainage facilities including upgrading of existing facilities and new construction to bring deficient areas to citywide standards . b . Improvement of Critical Water Facilities - Replacement of out- dated or worn out water faci Mies 1n o der portions of Huntington Beach to bring water service up to citywide stan- dards . c. Improvement of Street Lighting Facilities in Critical Areas - Upgrading or new construction of street lighting in areas below the citywide standards . d. Street Improvements - including resurfacing , curbs , gutters an sidewalks . e . Removal of architectural barriers for the handicapped and provision for improved pe estrian mobility and access . Provision of Public Facilities in Key Commercial and Industrial Areas - Public assistance in the development , of key commercial and industrial areas by providing , in whole or in part, certain public facilities . Provisions of additional subsidized or low-rent units for low- and moderate- income families , the elderly , and the handicapped. lip 50 • • • 2 .0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND IMPACT The proposed program will be implemented in the City of Huntington Beach , an urban area contained within the Los Angeles Metropolitan region. As a result of the metropolitan nature of the community and the surrounding region , the city is essentially urban in character. A comparative analysis of the program and existing/projected land uses indicate no adverse environmental impacts resulting from program implementation . Projects contained within this program proposal gen- erally have a beneficial impact on the environment , working to improve the range and quality of community services and facilities . 1 . Land Use/Demographic Impacts The program generally has no impacts in the area other than positive impacts effected by improvement projects such as the revitalization of the Downtown area and the rehabilitation of D blighted neighborhoods . The proposed development of recreation and community center facilities will also positively affect land use configurations . 2 . Topography and Geology Program proposals will have no significant impact on topography or geologic features . A ft I ii P. 51 3. Water Resources The project area contains a large portion of the Santa Ana River flood basin , and much of this area is subject to periodic regional flood hazards . Potential flood hazards and the extent of the Santa Ana flood plain are environmental concerns which are evalu- ated in relation to all specific project proposals . The program itself has little direct impact on the quality of water resources other than projects directed towards improving the stability of the water table , and improvements to flood-control devices . 4. Air Resources The City of Huntington Beach is located within the South Coast Air Basin , and like other coastal cities experiences considerably less air pollution then inland communities . The program itself will have no identifiable impact on the quality of air resources . 5. Biological Resources Implementation of the project proposal will not result in any ad- verse impact of biological resources or natural habitats . 6. Human Interest Resources Archaeological sites exist within the program area and have been located for the most part. Each specific project must be evalu- ated as to its possible effects on human interest resources , however , no significant impacts are expected. 7. Municipal Services and Utilities Specific facets of the program proposal , especially physical improvement projects and the expansion or construction of com- munity facilities , will generally result in incremental increases in demands on service systems and other municipal services . Some projects incorporating conservation oriented design features , may result in positive impacts in this area. All individual projects are evaluated in terms of their impact on services and utilities and the ability of existing systems to accommodate project proposals . 8. Economics Program implementation will result in positive impacts on the economic position of the community . Specific project proposals will result in increased employment in the short-range , while long-term impacts .of increased economic diversification , broader employment opportunities , and the stabilization and revitali- zation of declining neighborhoods should result from program implementation . Aft 52 9 . Traffic/Circulation Circulation will be positively effected by several facets of the proposed program. While specific projects may result in incre- mental increases in traffic trips , the overall effect will be one of increasing personal mobility and improving the functioning at the overall transportation system. 10. Acoustical Quality • The program will have no identifiable impact on community noise levels , other than short-term impacts generated through the implementation of physical improvement projects . • • 53 • APPENDICES • FEDERAL APPLICATION .ae huM�f�on beach planning deportment 'r-o OMB No. 63-21471 U.S. OEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 1. STATE CLEARMIGNOUBE IOENTIFIER URBAN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE a. APPUZAAR APPLICATION No. B-78-MC-06-0506 3. FEDERAL GRANTOR AGENCY 4. APPLICANT NAME Department of Housing and Urban Development Cityof Huntington Beach AREA OR REGIONAL OFFICE STREET Am"" • P.O. BOX Los Angeles Area Office 2000 Main Street P.O. Box 190 STREET ADDRESS - P.O. BOX CITY COUNTY 2500 Wilshire Boulevard Huntington Beach Orange CITY ~` STATE ZIP CODE STATE ZIP COOS Los Angeles California 90057 California 92648 S. DESCRIPTIVE NAME OF THE PROJECT Community Development Block Grant Program Entitlement 6. FEDERAL CATALOG No. 7. FEOERAL FUNDING REQUESTED 14. 218 $ 1 ,259 ,000 s. GRANTEE TYPE ❑ STATE, ❑ COUNTY, (21 CITY. ❑ OTHER (Sp"*)F) 9. TYPE Of APPLICATION REQUEST NEW GRANT, [] CONTINUATION, ❑ SUPPLEMENT, ❑ OTHER CHANGES (Spoco) 10. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE GRANT, CJ LOAN, ❑ OTHER (Specify) 11. PGPULATION DIRECTLY BENEFITING FROM THE PROJECT 13. LENGTH OF PROJECT 115,960 12 months 12. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 14. BEGINNING DATE 34, 38, 40 July 1978 b. 34, 4 0-— - - 15. DATE OF APPLICATION _ 111 . i HE AVPL.ICANT R CETIFIES THAT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF THE DATA IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, AND THAT HE WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF HE RECEIVES THE GRANT. TYPED NAME TITLE Floyd G. Belsito lCityAdministrator TELEPNONk NUMMR SIGN AT E OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE COM M*w cut. 714 153675201 - PON PEtEER" USE ONLY EDITION OF 10 74 IS OBSOLETE NUp•7A1i(1I.7a) 54 i.NAME OF APPLICANT 2.APPLICATION NO. 3.'2§ORIGINAL " DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT l City of Huntington B -06A0506 ❑AMENDMENT ENTTITLEMITLEMENT APPLCCAKTS ONLY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Beach 4.PROGRAM YEAR: FROM: July 78 TO: June 1979 CENSUS ESTIMATED COST IS000) RELATED TRACT/ RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL BLOCK GRANT FUNDS OTHER FUNDS ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION SHORT ENUMER• REVIEW LINE BUDGET • OBJECTIVE ATION STATUS ITEM PROGRAM SUBSEOUE TOTAL AMOUNT SOURCE DISTRICT YEAR YEAR rtl 12) 13) (4I (5) (6) r7) (8) (9) (101 Neighborhood Preservation/ C-1 993.02 Assessment 5 .250,000 200,000 450,000 0 0 Rehabilitation Loans Program C-2 993.03 C-3 994.02 Main St. Village Improvements C-1 993.02 Assessment 2 271 ,000 931 ,9001 ,202,9001 0 0 Construction Removal of Architectural Barriers C-6 City- Assessment 6 40,000 0 40,000 0 - for Elderly and Handicapped wide Oldtown Storm Sewer Construction C-1 993.01 Assessment 2 400,000 Unknown 400,000 00,000 City Cypress/Ash Streets Storm Sewer C-3 994.02 Assessment 2 95,000 0 95.000 0 - Construction Oakview Recreation Improvements C-3 994.02 Assessment 2 75,000 0 95,000 ! 0 - Provision of Smoke Detection C-1 993.02 Assessment 9 30,500 0 30,500 0 - Devices C-2 993.03 C-3 993.02 Emergency Medical Information C-1 993.02 Assessment 9 5,500 0 5,500 0 - System C-2 993.03 C-3 994.02 992.15 Program Administration - - - 70,000 80,000 150,000 0 - Unspecified Local Option - 22,000 Unknown 22,000 0 - `l GRAND TOTAL 1259,00f 1,21100 .2,470,9 $300,00 HUD-7015.1 (11-75) . � U S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT A ORIGINAL B. APPLICATION NO. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUDGET ❑ AMENOMEN I B-78-MC-06-0506 C.�NAME OF APPLICANT D.PROGRAM YEAR City of Huntington Beach FROM: July 1978 To: June 1979 NNE E. PROGRAM ACTIVITY AMOUNT FORUSEO LD 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 2. PUBLIC WORKS.FACILITIES,SITE IMPROVEMENTS 841, 000 3. CODEENFORCEMENT 4, CLEARANCE,DEMOLITION,REHABILITATION 5 REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 250 .000 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 40,000 7. PAYMENTS FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME e. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 36 000 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES 11 COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL/NDP PROJECTS 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13. I PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT 14 —4ADMINISTRATION 70,000 15. CONTINUATION OF MODEL CITIES ACTIVITIES 16. SUBTOTAL (Sum of Lines 1 thru 15) 1,237,000 17 CONTINGENCIES AND/OR UNSPECIFIED LOCAL OPTION ACTIVITIES (Not to exceed 10%of line 16) 22,000 18 TOTAL PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS(Sum of Lines 16end 17) 1,259,000 LINE F.RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS NO. s � f 1, ENTITLEMENT OR DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT 1,259,000 ;f. 0. 2. LESS DEDUCTIONS 0 ,.9p. �f .'+sr ;`} x' q->•r..Y. gY 3 ENTITLEMENT/DISCRETIONARY AMOUNT FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES (Line I minus 2) , 259,000 4. PROGRAM INCOME 5. SURPLUS FROM URBAN RENEWAL/NDP SETTLEMENT 6. LOAN PROCEEDS 7. REP-ROGRAMMEO UNOBLIGATED FUNDS FROM PRIOR PROGRAM YEAR B. TOTAL RESOURCES FDA PROGRAM ACTIVITY COSTS ISum ol'Lines 3.7/ �1259,000 / ❑Check box ljcosfs include indirect costs which require approval oJa tact allocation plan as required by Federal Management Circular 74.4. EDITION OF 10-74 IS OBSOLETE HUD-7015.5 111.75) 56 ::. 7r�7p.I I' • 1. neighborhood fraeerwtion lregram (All Target Areas) 2. 4oke Detector. :•} ::'{:: ?:`: i (All Target Area.) :•L 7. Smargency Radical Information (All Target Areas) 6. Cyprees/Ash sto:, sager S. Removal of Architectural Berrie" (Citywide) ;;..;?;,. ;;••;• ;};, - (Citywide) :e;, :ii::: :;'+.• , r 6. main street Village Improvements 7. Oakview Center Recreation lmproramrats 8. Oldtown storm Swer BCD Target Areas r � i r : r r L��CATION (M YEAR EM. hunting ton beat planning apartment r 57 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (STATEMENT OF NEEDS) 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION NUMBER T3. ® ORIGINAL . ' —78—MC-06-0506 AMENDMENT 4.PROGRAM YEAR (EndtfW CIt APOieartts On/y) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FROM: JUJV, 1978 TO: J A-1 Citizen Participation The participation of local residents (especially those from HCD target neighborhoods) is key to the success of the HCD Program. Continued . and expanded efforts to encourage residents to participate in the preparation of each year' s HCD Program are needed, and residents should be encouraged to organize to meet their own needs and to make those needs known to those who act in the decision-making process. Source: Human Resources Council HCD Citizens Advisory Committee Data Sourer A-2 Existing Housing Assistance The City shall continue to participate with the Orange County Housing Authority to provide subsidized housing as one mechanism to assist the approximately 6, 700 renter households requiring assistance. Additional steps should be taken to encourage greater participation by landlords in the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program, and the City shall continue to monitor the operation of the program to assure that it is responsive to the needs of local residents. Source: Department of Planning and Environmental Resources HCD Citizens Advisory Committee Data Sourer A­3 New Construction Housing Assistance y, Although the Section 8 Leased Housing Assistance Program has been of great assistance to the City' s renter households, the availability of rental units for rents that do not exceed the fair market 1 rents under Section 8 is diminishing.- Therefore, the construction-of -new sub- ' I sidized or low-rent -units for both-tamiles and the elderly is needed. Source: Orange County Housing Authority Citizen Comments Data Sourer. Poyo_�of —Poyo� HUD-7015.2 (11-7: 58 - ; * COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY ISTATEMENT OF NEEDS) 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2.APPLICATION NUMBER 13. 5a ORIGINAL AMENDMENT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 4.PROGRAM YEAR lBArfN Apolkftrs only) * FROM: July, 1978 TO; July, 1979 A• -4 Housing Rehabilitation Although much of the City' s housing stock has been built within the last ten years, there are several older areas that have deteriorated and some newer areas that show early signs of decline. Approximately 1950 units require rehabilitation at this time, and both these units and those showing early signs of decline will need to be improved to preserve this critical_ set}_ment_of_ the_hous nq_ stock to help main tain housingfor moderate-income households. Source: SCAG Community Analysis Report, Robert J. Rodino Assoc. Clete Source: A. -5 Public Works Improvements All of the HCD target neighborhoods require at least some public works improvements. Street__improve'ments; lighting; _curbs, gutters, and sidewalks acid Storm sewers; and fire protection facilities are the most frequent needs.* However, some areas also require the removal of architectural barriers for the handicapped or other more specialized improvements for pedestrian mobility and access. Source: Department of Public Works Citizen Comments pats Source: A•-6 Downtown Revitalization The downtown area of Huntington Beach developed early in the 1900 ' s and many of the buildings are now unsightly, do not meet current building codes, and house marginal commercial uses. There are also • the attendant problems of parking, pedestrian access, and lack of land- scaping and street furniture. A comprehensive and coordinated appli- cation of all available resources is necessary to correct these problems. Source: Downtown Redevelopment Plan; Planning Staff Citizen Comments j Downtown Merchants Guild I Data Source: Palo—of _Polo$ HUD-7015.3 (11-751 59 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (STATEMENT Of NEEDS) 1. NAME OF APPLICANT 2. APPLICATION NUMBER 9. ® ORIGINAL -78-MC-06-0506 AMENDMENT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH a. PROGRAM YEAR /EnNHNMM AP*kantl Only) ►ROM: July, 1978 TO: July, 1979 , A'-7 Provision of Human Service Needs Each of the City' s HCD target areas is unique by virtue of the charact- eristics of their respective populations. Because of the diverse nature of the neighborhoods, a wide range of human need services and facilities is required, including day care services, social services, counseling and referral, juvenile diversion, health care, senior citi- zen services, transportation, housing assistance, and recreation. In target neighborhoods with a community center, these services are coordinated through the center while assisting and encouraging .neigh- borhood residents to become self-sufficient. Source: First, Second, and Third Year HCD Programs Citizen Comments , Human Resources Council i Mayor' s Advisory Committee on the Handicapped Data Source Council on Aging A• -8 Provision/Preservation of Recreation and Open Space To fully improve some neighborhoods, it will be necessary to provide recreational open space and/or preserve significant recreational or open space resources. Therefore, acquisition of land and/or purchase.of equipment may be required to ensure that these needs of target neigh- borhoods are met. Source: First, Second, and Third Year HCD Programs Citizen Comments 4 Data Source A- 9 Program Administration i As the scope of the HCD Program has increased, the need for a greater commitment to program administration has become evident. Program administration includes compensation to employees assigned to the pro- gram and the attendant operating expenses for employee benefits, supplies, and capital outlay items. Program staff must prepare each year' s application and conduct citizen meetings and public hearings, as well as oversee the implementation of approved CD projects. Also there is a need for administrative service to conduct the environmental review for projects in each year' s CD Program-. 1 i Dots Source Page-ofPages HUD-7015.2 (11-75) 60 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (, -Ts to Olaxect vest Nam of Applicant Application Numiier Z Original B-78-MC-06-0506 U Amm><imont CITY OP Iltlhl'I'ING'ITA BEACI1 Program Yoar(Entitlement Applicants Only) From: July, 1978 Tw June, 1979 8 a l 1. Revitalization of the Downtown Area - Subsequent to the adoption of a plan for the old Downtown Areal which is now being prepared, a series of City initiated actions will be necessary to implement the plan. These actions will probably include (dependent upon the adopted plan) : Upgrading of existing or construction of new public facilities, new zoning regulations, code enforcement programs and cooperative efforts between public and private sector interests to foster revitalization. Supports Need(s)No: A-1, A-4, A-5, A-6, A-7 B- 2. Provision of Community Services and Necessary Related Facilities to All Residents. Provision of community services and facilities that are not otherwise available to residents of Huntington Beach, particularly low- and moderate-income families , and the elderly, and the handicapped as well as others in need of such services. A-1, A-5, A-7, A-8 Supports Need(s) No: B-3 3. Projects to upgrade Neighborhoods with Indications of Blight and Deterioration - Upgrading- program for critical neighborhoods could include: a. Revamp of zoning ordinance to simplify, codify and streamline requirements and particularly, processes. b. Housing code enforcement. c. Underwrite, partially or wholly, off-site public improvements in deficient neighborhoods. d. Develop and provide programs relative to .housing rehabilitation, home management, maintenance, budgeting, etc. Supports Need(s) No: A-1, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-7, A-8 Pages of r Pages 61 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (Long Term Objectives) Name of Applicant Application Number X)Original 0 Amendment CITY OF IRWINGTON BEACIi Program Year(Entitlement Applicants Only) From: July, 1978 To: June, 1979 B-4 4. Impact of Critical Public Works Facilities - a. Improvement of Critical Flood Control and Drainage Facili- ties - Improvement of drainage facilities including upgrading of existing facilities and new construction to bring deficient areas to citywide standards. b. Improvement of Critical Water Facilities - Replacement of out- dated or worn out water facilities in older portions of Huntington Beach to bring water service up to citywide standards. C. Improvement of Street Lighting Facilities in Critical Areas Upgrading or new construction of street lighting in areas below the citywide standards. d. Street Improvements - including resurfacing, curbs, gutters and sidewalks. e. Removal of architectural barriers for the handicapped and provision or Improved pe es rian mobility—and access. Supports Need(s) No. A-5 A-6, B-5 5. Provision of Public Facilities in Key Commercial and industrial Areas - Public assistance in the development of key commercial and industrial areas by providing, in whole or in part, certain public facilities. Supports Need(s)No: A-5, A-6 , A-8 B-6 6. Provisions of additional subsidized or low-rent units for low- and moderate-income families, the elderly, and the handicapped. Supports Need(s)No: A-1, A-2y. A-3 Page of r Pages 62 * COMMUNITY OEVEELOP94ENT PLAN SUMMARY {Short-Term Objectives) Nam of Applicant Appiie"m Number Original p Amendment CITY OF HUNTING ON BEACH F""Wam Yew(Entitbment Applicants Only) From: July, 1978 To: June, 1979 C1 D0WNT0TP01N/4ICM�= Cr 993.02 1. Continued funding for Redevelopment Planning. 2. Institute Code Enforcement Program for commercial buildings and renter- and owner- occupied housing. 3. Initiate rehabilitation loans/grants program 4. Provide self-help rehabilitation training _ 5. Provision/improvement of drainage facilities. 6. Provision/improvement of water and sewer facilities. 7. Improvement/provision of streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and alleys. . 8. Improvement/provision of street lights and traffic signals. 9. Land acquisition/write-down for senior citizen/low-inocme housing. 10. Improvements to senior citizens center and T-L-C Program. Facility. 11. Provision/improvement of parking facilities. 12.Imprave fire protection facilities 13.Support neighborhood organization 40 Supports Nsed(si No: A-1, A-3, A-4, A 5, A-6, A-7 cl OId7IOM Cr 993-03 1. Institute Code Enforcennt Program for renter- and owner-occupied housing. 2. Institute rehabilitation loans/grants programs # 3. Provide self-help rehabilitation training. 4. Provision/execution of drainage facilities. 5. Provision/improvement of water/sewer facilities. 6. Provision/improvement of streets, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. 7. Provision of street lights and signals. 8. Provision of open space/ recreational facility. 9. Support Neighborhood Organization Program. A-1, A-4, A-5, A-8 l3 OAKVIE[a Cr 994.02 1. Institute Code Enforcement Program for renter- and owner-occupied housing. 2. Institute rehabilitation loans/grants program. 3. Provide self-help rehabilitation training program. 4. Provision/improvement of water and sewer facilities. 5. Provision/improvement of streets, curbs, gutters, .and sidewalks. 6. Provision of street lights/signals. 7. Support neighborhood organization program. 8. Institute juvenile diversion program. 9. Institute police rapport program. 10. Further the outreach services/facilities for center. 11-Improve recreational facilities at neighborhood center. SUPPMU N"d(s)NO: A-1, A-4, A-5, A-7, A-8 Papa of Pass ti � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY (Short-Term Objectives) Name of Applicant q �i n pIu p�—c �—ME'-06-0506 0 Amendment �Amendment CITY OF HUNTINGI'ON BEACH Program Year(Entitlement Applicants Only) From: July, 1978 To: June, 1979 C-4 BUSHARD Cr 993.15 1. Support Neighborhood Organization Program 2. Institute Police Rapport Program Supports Need(s)No: A-1, A-7 C-5 HSSTORICAL PRESERVATION 1. Provide parking for the Newland House Supports Needs) No: A-1, A—8 C-6 PROJECTS FOR THE HANDICAPPED 1. Removal of architectural barriers. Supports Need(s) No: A-1, A—5, A—7 Page—___of r Pages 64 f+•i� s' "DJ-5;NG A-SUSTANC-:?,,,,y - LISLE I SJRVEY OF;J 15:..;,CCx'-iT!Ot i A. HOUSi.tC ST,AT:IS_w.•ti C7-4::4 Iqv OF &Lk 40p t%:•.;;Lv'TS+g THE CO.••r.:v_•'. -E':c Ai>e-:AI- - t,- :Sa :a City of Huntington Beach ' - 06 :- . Cr;rC-aF•.Q=;...G.S:.R,eCvKatS[7 ' r July, 1978 to June 1979 "U.5Ea a -aas._:uK Ts YEAR L.'rs STATUS•+D CCNCITIO`•OF ALL^a..i7M: .ac+-S OF 7JCrl .. .. _ !.jQc:,..aa T.:.s - - 1977 � 54,200 - 942 35,935 251 - 18,765 691 •. s�q>an.a.e 1977 324 0 121 0 203 0 1977 53,876 942 35,814 251 18,062 691 • z Y:cs,...a.;.ol.l nirs : Tel.! 1977 1,884 81: 912 7 972 74 1977 23 0 2 . 0. 21 0 ►. s.:ee•e ,. -.. -. ... 1977 1,861 81 910 7 951 74 T.I .,..•::,,. .:._ 1977 56,08r4 - 1,003 36,847 258 19,237 �. ,Rzle ,- 1977 3.36% 7.9% 2.5% 2.7% 5.1% 9. .. .:••i.nare b w...,}:d ar.a. •a•A `c a,-e_a a t._ ,aoi Cam .r4'a-q- •- - -'',i-'"Tae f :.{qc..K..a a ...re r-,.a.-q aa♦ .e. 5 DEFISMONS. O4LA SOURCES. AND W ET:><:OS -'ac's e:a.r.ana:=ges' SCAG Data based on Regional Housing Allocation Model.. Data supplied December, 1977 k Dee.w.rcea.nd.r.-Sala a.d. rn rn Fenn Approved, - OMS No.63R-1471 Per 1 of 2 .U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN - TABLE II. HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS I. NAME APPLICAN- 2. APPLICATION'GRANT NUMBER - 3. ORIGINAL City of Huntington Beach B i - 7 18 I -"M '.0 ! - 10 1 - 0 5 0 6 " AMENDMENT, OA?E= 4. PROGRAM YEAR S. DATE OF HOUSING SURVEY 1S)USED FROM! July 1978 TO: June 1979 NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS ALL HOUSEHOLDS ALL FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS ' ALL MINORITY HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING A;S:STANCE I LARGE I LARGE LARGE 'ELDERLY OR FAMILY i ELDERLY OR FAMILY ELDERLY OR FAAOLY FAMILY I FAMILY fAf11LY TOTAL HANDICAPPED (4 or kss i TOTAL HANDICAPPED; (;or less TOTAL MANDICAPPEDI (4 or less ($or more ($or mtKe ($dr awe (1.2 persons/ persons) persons) It1.2 persons/ i persons) persons) (1-2 persons); PorsOos) p4 J -lob 0b 1) (W) (W) - 064) (rl) (r2) (e-3) (c-I) (41•1) (d•2) fdFs'1 f� 1 A. OWNER HOUSEHOLDS(Excluding despiaer;.e 1081 246"(40) 428 407 358 L21(13) 169 68 152 36 6 55 6 : 2 j B. RENTER HOUSEHOLDS 7237 1226(26 ) 5948 2063 3000_ 1943(111)� 1522 535 1256 13(46)* 686 358 (Excluding displacecs! 3 I C. HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED IN PROGRAM YEAR(Sun of lines Cl and C2) 41 1. Owners s 2. Renters D. ADDITIONAL FAMILIES EXPECTED TO RESIDE z e I IN COMMUNITY(Sum of lines DI and D2) '. = - ""� ^ li� 1. As a result of planned&Woyment ** 120 i e 2. Alyea employed in localit E. TOTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS s :am 0)lines.4, B. C.and D) 9885 11479000 5504 2902 � 1O Percent of Total 100% 1 15.0 % 55.7-- 29.3 x s F. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS(I ttach additional pages) Based on data supplied by SCAG from the SCAG Regional Housing Allocation Model, Dec. 1977. *The City of Huntington Beach in the pre-plan phase of a redevelopment project. Because the nature and scope of the project has not been determined, no estimates of displaced persons or households is available at this time. **Based on reduced employment schedule of new primary employment source. fRlD- � - Poe.2 1 2 U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN -TABLE If- HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS 1. MANE OF APPLICANT - - 2. APPLtCATtOM/GRANT MUNSER - 3. ORIGINAL AMENDMENT:DATE- City of Huntington Beach s - 7 1 8 - M I C I - 0 1 6 - 0 •5 0 6 4. ROGRAM YEAR F&gn,July; 197 June 1979 PROVIDE DATE FOR EACH CATEGORY Of MINORITY HOUSEHOLD,AS APPROPRIATE rChoek ePproyrr. (Cheek 4ppro te Fete kelp (Cheek eppropri*f*eos) --- _ I-X] &LACK/NEGRO e- ORIENTAL 1. Q FLACK/NEGRO e•V ORIENTAL I.Q SACK/NEGRO e.._-ORIENTAL STATUS OF 2.`1 SPANISH-AMERICAN S. ALL OTHER 2.®S►ANISH-AMERICAN S.L_-.; ALL OTHER 2. SPANISM-AMERfCAN S. ALL OTHER HOUSEHOLDS REQUIRING MINORITIES MINORITIES MINORITIES ASSISTANCE 3. AMERICAN INDIANS.Q AMERICAN INDIAN 3. AMERICAN INDIAN ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE - ELDERLY OR! FAMILY LARGE FAMILY FAMILY I FAMILY TOTAL MANOICAPPE ;j or less -TOTAL HANDICAPPED! "!or l+.cs TOTAL gANDICAFPEOt )j or lrs+ /�pr more !l-2 erwas) persons) a rs more 15°f�O« !l-2 persons)! ,sons; P persons; (!•3 persons)i personal persons) P P' persons) (s) (eA) (e-2) (e-I) (e-SY (1-1) (h2) (/-3) 0-4) ( 1) ( -2) ( -3) ( -e) A. ONHERHOUSEHOLDS 2 0 1 1 130 2(5) 45 53 20 4(1) 9 7 (—Wift di: ees)-Teti( z IL RENTER HOUSEHOLDS 21 4(1) 10 7. 1078 82(40) 590 306 157 27(5) $6 45 (nnewim dis es-Tow 3 C. HOUSEHOLDS EXPECTED TO BE DISPLACED Nt PROGRAM YEAR rjw of lines!and 2) s s Renters ' 'D. TOTAL(Sam of lines d,B,and Q 21 4 11 8 1208 -214(45) 635 359 177 31(6) 95 52 Based on data supplied by SCAG from the SCAG Regional Housing Allocation Model, Dec. 1977. MUD-7015.9 f12-75i E31 V t a„n Approved OMIT No.6311 1471 Page 101 2 e es i U.S.DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND URBAN DEYELOPMENI HOUSING ASMSTANCE PLAN TABLE Ill. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE CURRENT YEAR COAL 1. NAME OF ♦PPLIC AN I -- IXI ORIWNnI . City of Huntington Beach a I I AMC NOMrN 1. OAT F.: 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER •. PROGn AM YEAR e - 7 1 8 - M I C - 0 1 6 - 0 5 0 6 FROM. July, 1978 TO: June, 1979 NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED EL.DFRI Y Of? LARGE TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE ALL HANDICAPPLOI FAMIL`( FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS (1 nr l,•.•c (.�,rr mart nn Ir - (0) (b) (c) (d) A. NEW RENTAL UNITS t 1. Section 8-HUD 200- _ 100 100-.-_. _. - 2- 2._StQte_AQency=TQtf�Sum nJ(ine-s s a. Section 6 s 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing Odcatifyl- Total 6 Section 2Q2-._. .._... - - --- -.200 .__ ._.- 200 — a <--Total(sae n� l;ata 1,1,nnd J, 400 - 300 B, REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS e 1 Section 8-HUD--*--- — - t0 2. Sta1e Agency-To�af(�tr-er u((iota a Bad 61 � ._. .___ r a. Section 8 b. Other Is 3. Other Assisted Rehobilitation of Rental Housing (ldensifYl - Total u ,: _ a._..__- -- le 4. Total(Sant o Linea 1 1,and JJ C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS 17 1. Section 8-HUD.,. __. 550.._.. ._.. . 150 275 - . ..125--. is 2. $tote A enc -T tot fSun n line., ., and 61 Ia a. Section 8 20 b. Other _. -...-.... . . - ......__...._. .--- j1 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (Identif)) - Total z: g, 24 4. Total(Sum of tln,•a 1,2.and.1) --- i25 0. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS - -- — — ss 1. CO Block Grunts ------_------,_-.._ ._ :��— ---...... ,�0-�--- ---Z,Z.------ 2e 2. Stcligp_235 — — - - -- 27 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or Prospective Homeowners(ldexufy, - Total ze g . — --- -- ----- - —-- _ 20 4. Total(Sent u lines 1,2.and J) -•---- 40.... 22 -3—• E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS-.- -_----- --------__-- -----.---.- -___---- --_ - 2/ l ----- ----- ------- ------- — sz 2. Other-adeetiJyl - Total _ ---- - �• b. _— so 3. Total(Sum of lines l and 2) so F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS (Sari of limes AJ,N4.C4.04. and I;JJ 1015 490 297 228 68 HUD-7015.10(12-75) Pop;of I o s • U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN OEVtLOPMtNT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABLE Ill. COALS,FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE THREE YEAR GOAL. 1. NAME OF APPLICANT S. IgI ORIGINAL City of Huntington Beach I I AMLNOMENT.OAit: S S. APPLICATION.*G OIANT NUMBER e. PROGRAM YEAR 17 1 8 _ I M C I - 0 1 6 - 1 0 1 Sl O j 6 FRom:July, 1976 TD- June, 1979 NUMEER OF 11101/3VEHOLDS TO RE ASSISTED TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE ELDERLY OR FAMILY LARGE/inrlr.x• ALL HANDICAPPED FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS (1-2 ilrrsunx) if rrxunxj (iur Mar, . ' JIYr.YlINx� - (al (b) (C) (d) lot A. NEW RENTAL UNITS 2 2. Solo Agency-Tote)(Sum aJ line., a and bl _ 3 0. section 8 - -- -------- ------ ----- --- - -- s 3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing 6 a. Section. 202..._—.. • [_�4. Total(sum u1 ts ub 1.:.and J) - 385 20 A. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS • I. Section R-HUD 7-1 to Slate A ency•-Ielol s o and 11) i t o. Sect; B — 13 3.-Other Assistod Rehabilitation of Rental Housing --..._.— (1.1-ripi -- Total 14 to !. To.1 n liars l,2,and J, C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS: IT ). Sedioa a-MUD_- 1650 250 _102,•9•—__ _-._ 3$.Q__. is 2. Srote Agency:To1e!(5um�inr. — .— zo It. Other 21 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing fldrna J• Torel-----------.. _ za b• z. _i-Toro1'i<I�m �liars 1.-,ua,l eJ.. ..._-.- .... �650--.- 750 l� © ._....,.._ . 380_ D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR ►ROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS zs _I.-CD black Grants- to 2. Section 235.----_..._-_.. 37 3. Other Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or Prospective Homeowners"ldtnn(1!• Total •. . Te a. 1 301 J. Total(Sam of tints 1,:,and Ji 2 '5 -- _.._7�~•_ if 6Q E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR --I._.PgQSP.�CT1�4k►1rOWkERS.___._.. ...._. - -- 31 1. Section 235 32 2.-Uthat f1detalibl• TatQ! --.�_--.._._._.._ __- _-_ .--- 3i 3. Total(Sam v/lines r and:f 3e F. ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE GOALS 2480 705 1135 640 (Sure o/lines:Id.64.1.1.114,and P.t _ _ 3T PERCENT OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS 100% 2B.4 % 1 45.7 % j 25.8 % G. EXPLANATION OF PRIORITIES(Alaleh additional1-90`91 ItUb-7tlt 5.10112-75) 69 OMD N,./7Q•U►1 11 1.IIt P A"W N 1 U//ICU SINU ANTI UNn AN U(V[LOhMI N f ' II1111110411 ASSISIANCI FLAN TAOL E IV •. GENERAL LOCATIONS POR PROPOSED LOWER INCOME HOUSING I LOAM/ nr Ar•1-61.A101•_••—_r.�... r.... r.�... .• IxI IIn1U1NAl f I� (*ITV 0V IIUN'1'IN(:'I'UN BEACH I I AYCrI IIMI,NI.UA 7t1 A •/ •f 1'/'i I 7I♦111 Ii.iY Y.r1•- _•_-•- A 1•NUUr1AM•1 AN `n -1 81 -1 "' "'- 5 O � July 197,E June 1979 A. 10/1611I7 I:IN)UAW i UCA111)N\UN MAP IN 11M APVLICA110N I. Nnw Ihu'.Inil iron Cmult llacl NIIAItIP15 1 The following census tracts have been deemed appropriate for the construction of new Senior Citizen and Family Housing: 993.02, 993.03,1 994.02, & 994.03. Any new consturction Projects of assisted housing must be in conformance with'the City Codes & Ordinances'; should p of ably be within the State designated C astal Zone; & t� •I�VI f�It: ISANl�lnf��ated so a�io°n o�e�o�w-incom�e"�iou°s'e'�io�'d�sa- 993.02, 993.03, and 994.02 1 1 • N. ,AI'I ANA110N UI 119 t(IION of Gf NI NAI LOCATIONS I.-Now U ni S111N:11mo Census tract determinations based on: the availability of mass transit, existing federal housing, number of vacant units, percent vacant land, shopping facilities, health & elderly facilities, percent of low income elderly. • T. NAhnMIlloHon HUD-►els.11 I12431 :I 70 %* S 9%.03 a 10.0) 919,6 02! c►4.0 P10.1 997.02 rp o10. C1 cls.o a►0.9 El0.4 01t.e1 0.2 .x,..,,.��. �,......« 111.0 KDIfA x 996.04 Pt0.1R cl3.o ! R►0.3 9 i s, 96.05 a 0• "F 997.03 995.01 994.08 994.07 aTtr Ca e t 0:• wwDeK c►l.o 994.01 +0 4.0 1)0.2 P11.1s1 eto.1 D►20994.06 alo.3 Dt0.5 C10.a !.... . 01.0 C►o.R i)0.1 ... C)3.0 El0•! D)1.D. 011.0 f OIl.0 0)2.0 /1YK E)0:2 - R10.2 Z)0.0 i R)0.) 992.11 994.05 • wewce 994.09 "4.04 994.02 a►0 :� C)1.0 ''010.4 a10.S 1 - ware p ', 0)2.0 . .............. ... C)R:0 .. C14.0 910.2I E)0.2 a 0:1 994.09 992.12 y 010.04 ..i., 0.1 C►5.0 h _ 0►2.0 9)6.4 ..•. 994.03 r 9993.01 f s 992.13 a o, 1 6 0o1100..27 ....^......U..:>„.e.. E 1 .0 eD►0.10 .9 92.14 fo.l C)7.0 2 D109 Cl0 R 0.2 0)2.0 M RKroww 1l0.E 0.09 C1.o992.15 )0 a ADAMS e)o.♦ 992.19 992.1� 992.17 C14.0 1 P)0.4 a)0.1 \. D)0.• C14.0, CI4.0 CIAO e•)0.0 "10.2 V10.09 DI 0.04 D►2.0 ... C10.9 Kg1AwArO4t4 993.02 E10.09 E►0.09 R10.2 011. a 993:03 Elo. Ar1ANTA ? � 0)0.5 . b �•'* C?1.0 0)0.s D)1,0 C)1.0 4A 9)0.05 -..,....., .... D)0.9......w....,. rUMIrDN 1)0.2 992.20 992.21 B) % Black C) % Spanish Surname ; . D) % Oriental, E) % Other Figure 1-2 ,{ x r PERCENTAGE MINORITIES BY CENSUS TRACT census tracts / 1973 special census r A 30% qg69 997.02 96.03 . 32% 25% 22% 99 t;-m 94.0 2 % 0% 25% 14% 992.11 995.01 994. 8 994.06 17% 42% 23% 38% 44% 992.11 94.0 994.05 994.01 14% 994.09 994.01 36% 24% 66% 43% 994.02 )92.12 34% 994.03 94.09 36% 992.14 992.1 53$ 43$ 46$ 33$ 993.01 992.13 9923 35 6 6% 993.0 3 992.19 992.18 99 7 93.02 65% 23% 15% 992.20 992.21 34% 15% Figure 1-3 PERCENTAGE LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOL.nS census tracts / 1973 special census 72 s • THIRD YEAR GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT huntington beach planning department r Form Approved OA11t No, 63 R 1 521 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT I. GRANTEE NAME AND ADDRESS 2. DATE OF PERIOD COVERED City of Huntington Beach BY REPORT 2000 Main Street, P .O. Box 190 11unLington Beach, California 92648 FROM: August, 1975 • TO: January, 1978 3. THE GRANTEE CERTIFIES THAT: (a) To the best of its knowledge and belief the data in this report was true and correct as of the date in Item 2. (b) The records mentioned in 24 CFR Port 570.907 ore being maintained and will be made available upon request. (c) Federal assistance mode available under the CDBG Program is not being utilized to reduce substantially the amount of local Financial Support for community development activities below the level of such support i prior to the start of the CDBG Program Year. TYPED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE TELEPHONE NO. Floyd G. Belsi.to, llncrude (.nde) City Administrator , (714) 536-5201. DATE January 16, 1978 HUD-4071 (9-75) 73 ow sawlaa U S.DEIARTMENT OF MOUSING AP40 URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1. PROGRESS ON PLANNED ACTIVITIES GRANTER NAME ��- KN WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTION[ABOUT FORM NUO GNANT 10[NTI•ICATION NO CITY OF HUNTINGTON*BEACH 1+78 RSO B-78-M-06-0506 AB IGUNT CURRENT ESTIMATED M,.ATan OBL/GATEO [X/tNOED NO. SKSCRIPT/ON YEAR CENSUS TRACT OR101N ►ufflo" BYOQET CURRENT tBTlYAT'EO CURB MY CVRR[M Be gun DATE Ling Man COST PROGRAa1 PRO YPE M ►YEAR RAY Lt/[or YEAR GRAM YtAR PROGRAN n, m 01 (41 a) 141 (71 r+, (vi (101 04 rs, 1 Citizen participation (reprogramnecl to program Administration) 1st E 6-77 14 17,300 17,300 J0 17,300 2 Assistance to Orange County Housing Authority 1st ITMME E 2.76 9 10,000 0 10,000 0 10,000 3 Ccnmunity Analysis Project 1st CIMME E 9-77 13 18,200 0 18,200 7,282 17,282 4 Upgrade water facilities-Phase 1 (Townlot) lst 9 S3 02 E 4-76 2 50,000 0 50,000 0 50,000 5 Doan to Redevelopment Agency 1st 9 S3 01 E 10-.77 13 89,500 0 89,50Q J0 67,865 9 S3 0 9 S3 0 6 Wheelchair ramp installation-Phase 1 1st 9 92 M E 9/76 6 31,800 pl 24,7031 124,703 9 92 1 9 92 1 9 92 1 9 94 0 9 94 0 7 Senior Citizen Center improvements 1st 9 9 0 E 2 76 6 4,500 0 22,342 0 22,342 HUD-4070 11•761 P�po 0f P.Q_ ' OMB{fRiff{ U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT I. PROGRESS ON PLANNED ACTIVITIES ORANTtE MAMt CITY BEACH DATE PE RsoN S1M0 CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT Pon;; MUO ORANT IDENTIFICATION MO 1/78 Stephen V. Kohler B-78-MC-06-0506 AMOUNT CURNtNT ER/MATED IKLATEO OBIJOATED ZXPEUDEO ROB OEKRI/t'ION TEAR COP- CURRSUT CENSUS TRACT OR10tU BYDOET KOUM R.RIOR ESTIMATED Q/RREMT CURB BUT OATS f.11K ITtY COST PROORAM UFt OP PROGRAM OF TEAR- PROORAY TEAR /Rf"OORAM (M) (5) (6) (7) 01 (101 011 III) 8 Coimmmity Center/Park A. Oldtown Park (reprogrammed to 3rd year projects) 1st 9 93 0 E droppal 2 0,000 50,000 50,000 pl B. Oakview Cmnmi.ty Center 1st 9 94 0 E 4/77 2 53,700 .0 63,700 63,420 9 Facilities/Programs for the Handicapped (reprogrammed to 3rd year projects) 1st 9 94 U. E droppEx 1 6 60,00 105,00 215,00 .0 �! 10 Bushard Cammanity Center 2nd 9 92 15 E 7/.78 2 04,OOC 99,50 99,50 p! �! 11 Assistance to Orange County Housing Authority (reprogrammed to 3rd year project 2nd C I E droppec 1 13 10,OOC 10,00 10,00 0 j6 12 Improvements to Senior Citizen Center 2nd 9 93 0 E 7/78 2 96,OOC 50,00 50,00 0 0 (46,00 ) (46,0 0) 13 Oldtown Storm Sewer 2nd 9 93 OL E 4/77 2 $2.7m 300,00 00,00 425,00 ) (425,0(0) 14 Human Resources Day Care Center 2nd C I E dro 9 32,300 32,300 32,300 0 J0 15 loan to Redevelopment Agency 2nd 9 93 OL E 6/78 13 9,500 0 189,50 0 67,865 9 93 0 9 93 0 1 16 Sha mel Ash Tree Removal 2nd D E 1 2/77 2 43,000 0 43,0001 pJ 3,000 ►.c. 2 of 3 p.YM MUD•4070 11-70I rn OMO 4111115[4 U S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND UROAN DEVELOPMENT I. PROGRESS ON PLANNED ACTIVITIES GRANTEE NAM[ DATE PSROON NI/O CAN OUST ANSWER OUtOTIONS ASOUT FORM MUD GRANT 10ENTIFICATION no CITY OF HUN INGTON BEACH 1 78 St B-78-MC-06-0506 AMOUNT CURRENT GST{YAT[D U wSLAT[O OGLIOATD [AKMOUo NO. D[Kw/FTION T[AR GtNOUO To ACT ORIGIN COY OYDG[T CURRENT "OUR FLAT"" GOTMATEO CVNNUNT CURR[RT DATG LINO ITS" COST FOAM LMU M FROOR AY VI[OF TSM PNOORAN TEAR FROiw/U/ r•) rs� r+� n� r+� r�i r�+� 01; (12) 17 Program Administration 2nd E 8/77 - 14,90 293.G 200 , jd 15,200 18 Facilities/Programs for the Handicapped (reprogrmuted to 3rd year projects) 2nd 9 S4 02 E droppe 1 2 660,00 110,00 215,0 0 0 0 19 Local Option 3rd B NA - 24,946 0 0 0 J0 20 O1dtown Storm Sewer - Phase II 3rd 9 S2 A 6/78 2 $2.7m 1300,00 600,0 0 306,08 ) (U6 � �! 21 Senior Citizens Housing Site 3rd CJ T&IDE A 6/78 1 250,00 0 0 0 0 22 Bushard Carm mity Center 3rd 9 S2 15 A 7/78 9 304,800 0 49,500 0 23 Senior Citizen Center 3rd 9 S3 02 A 6/78 6 105,00 J0 fd 24 Oakview Day Care Center 3rd 9 S4 02 A 7/78 9 165,00 25 Handicapped Nobility 3rd A 5/78 6 43,500 p 26 Rehabilitation loans 3rd 2. TNI E A 7/80 5 700,00 J0 p 27 Oakview Outreach Program 3rd 9 S4 02 A 7/78 9 12,500 J0 �! 28 Renovation of City Gym 3rd 9 S3 02 A 7/78 6 20,00 fd 0 29 Del Mar Storm Sewer 3rd 9 S2 14 A 6/78 2 0, 2UO,000�200,009 122,000 122,0( ( 30 Dangerous Building Code 3rd 9 S3 02 A 7/78 3 40,00 0 1 1 31 Program Administration 3rd A 6/78 - 52,754 19,345 19,34 i F.E. 3 OT 3 pow MUD-"?*0-761 1. Citizen Participation (reprogrammed to Program Administration) The citizen participation process is progressing well. Letters to advise civic groups of the application process are sent each year and presentations to explain the HCD program and solicit citizen participation and support have been made by the Planning Department to numerous such organizations . Phone contact has been made with organizations not responding to the letters to encourage them to schedule a presentation at one of their meetings . In addition, an HCD opinion survey was conducted during the preparation of the third year application. The survey sampled 300 low and moderate income families in Huntington Beach to tap their views on Housing and Community issues. This project provides funding for the administration, personnel, equipment and citizen participation elements of the HCD program. 2 . Assistance to the Orange County Housing Authority This project funded a one-year contract with the Orange County Housing Authority to provide a full-time tenants relations officer to administer the Section 8 Housing Program in the City of Huntington Beach. This project worked very well, providing needed housing as- sistance and counseling to area residents. The agreement was not renewed after the first year because of project criticism from a number of private persons and civic organizations . a 3. Community Analysis Report The Community Analysis Report is a project funded to implement a com- prehensive study of housing conditions and problems in the City, and to statistically document the need for rehabilitation and other forms of housing assistance. This study, completed in September 1977 , provides a data base for the formulation of a housing assistance stragegy. The project designates target neighborhoods, and outlines possible re- habilitation strategies. The project was originally to have been conducted by University of California, Irvine, student interns, but this approach proved to be infeasible. Consequently, the project was put out to bid and a consultant team was retained to conduct and complete the project. 4 . Upgrade Water Facilities This project funded the replacement and upgrading of the water supply system in selected portions of the Oldtown Area. No problems were encountered in the implementation of this project and it was completed in April, 1976. 5. Loan to Redevelopment Agency Allocations of funding for this project were made in an effort to facilitate the development of planning studies and the eventual adoption of a redevelopment plan for the downtown area. Preliminary studies have been completed, but the adoption of a redevelopment plan is still pending. 77 6 . Wheelchair Ramp Installation: Phase I This project funded the construction of approximately 150 curb cuts throughout the City to improve handicapped mobility. The project was completed through a $29 , 000 public works contract on October 1, 1976 . However, , $2 ,000 was withheld from the contractor pending investigation of alleged violations of HUD regulations governing pay- roll procedures. 7 . Senior Citizen Center Improvements This project funded the purchase of recreation equipment and a van for the Senior Citizen Recreation Center. Funds in the amount of $9 , 500 were transferred to this account from redevelopment studies as part of the previously processed Community Development Program amendment, and the project was completed in February, 1976 . 8A. Oldtown Park Bids for an independent appraisal of Cal Trans property were approved by the City Council on September 7 , 1976 . This appraisal was completed the week of October 18 , 1976 . The Department of Parks and Recreation renegotiated with Cal Trans for acquisition of the Community Center site, however, the asking price far exceeds the amount budgeted and the Council reprogrammed these funds to new projects as part of the City' s Third Year HCD Program. 8B. Oakview Community Center The initial construction bids for this project were rejected in July, 1976 . A second phase of bids were rejected by the City Council on August 9, 1976 . Bids were readvertised on August 11, 1976 , and opened on August 30, 1976 . The City Council awarded a contract on September 7 , 1976, to Robert C. Stellrecht for $63 , 685. 00. Construction of the community center was completed in June, 1977, and the facility is now fully operational . 9 . Facilities and Programs for the Handicapped These funds are allocated to pay a share of the cost of a pool and swim complex with facilities for the handicapped. The tentative determination . is to locate this facility at the Ocean View High School site with the Huntington Beach Union High School District contributing the land and maintenance. An ad hoc committee of Council members, Huntington Beach Union High School District representatives , a Parks and Recreation Commissioner, representatives of City Administration and Parks and Recreation Department has been formed to discuss the provisxnns of mutual recre- ational facilities. The first meeting of this committee was on Thursday, October 21, 1976 . Problems have been encountered in acquiring the necessary additional funds to construct this facility and the City Council has reprogrammed these funds to Third Year HCD Projects. 78 10 . Bushard Community Center This project is intended to fund the construction of a new multiple-use community center. The facility will provide on-site office space for social services , community meeting rooms, a mat room and rec- reation facilities. The project, to be administered by the Huntington Beach Boy s Club, is sited on a portion of the Bushard/Oka Schools playing fields . The firm of Blurock and Partners was selected to design and implement the project, and a contract with the City was approved in December, 1977 . The City is presently conducting neighborhood meetings aimed at involving neighborhood residents in the implementation process, and construction should begin in Spring, 1978 . 11. Assistance to the Orange County Housing Authority Program was dropped, and funds were reprogrammed to third year projects. See Project #2 for narrative description. 12 . Improvements to the Senior Citizen' s Center This project provides funding for physical improvements to the Senior Citizen' s Center. These include the construction of additional lighted parking facilities, outdoor recreation facilities and land- scaping. Public meetings were held with senior groups to determine the type of program needed, and improvement plans have been drawn up and approved by the City Council. Construction bids were taken in October, 1977 . Project funding of 50 ,000 (HCD) is being supple- mented with $46 , 000 from the City. The City is presently investi- gating the use of these funds to construct a new senior center. 13. Oldtown Storm Sewer Funds for this project have been matched by the Orange County Flood i Control District ($300,000) and local drainage fees ($125, 000) . The project is directed towards alleviating drainage problems and seasonal flooding of the Oldtown area. After completion of the EIR for this project, a negative declaration was published on May 20, 1976. The City Council awarded the contract for construction of the first phase of the storm sewer on September 13 , 1976 . The location of private oil pipelines within the project right-of-way caused some delay in implementation of the first phase of construction, but this portion of the project has now been completed. 14. Human Resources Day Care Center The funds requested for this project proved insufficient for im- plementation due to unexpectedly high liability insurance premiums . Therefore, on October 26, 1976, the City Council reprogrammed these funds to an additional project to increase handicapped mobility. The City is now working with the Mayor' s Handicapped Advisory Com- mittee to determine what type of project will most benefit the City' s handicapped residents . 79 15 . Loan to the Redevelopment Agency (See Project #5) 16 . Shamel Ash Tree Removal This project was begun in late 1976 , and no problems were encountered in implementing the project. The Ash Tree removal program was completed in February, 1977. ' 17 . Program Administration This project provides funding for the administration, personnel, equipment and citizen participation elements of the HCD program. 18 . Facilities and Programs for the Handicapped (See Project #9) 19 . Local Option These funds have not been committed at this time. 20. Oldtown Storm Sewer Construction on the second phase of the Oldtown Storm Sewer was begun in December, 1977 . A construction contract was awarded in October, 1977 . $300,000 of HCD funding for this project will be supplemented with $309 , 000 in local drainage fees. 21 . Senior Housing Site This project provides funding for acquisition improvements of a site for low-income senior citizen housing. A specific location for this project has not yet been determined, and the City is presently in- vestigating the use of these monies to fund site improvements on a municipally-owned site for the provision of privately constructed low-income senior housing . 22 . Bushard Community Center (See Project #10) 23. Senior Citizen Center This project provides for improvements/construction for the senior citizen center. The original proposal called for the construction of a 3, 000 square foot addition to the existing senior center, however, the City is presently investigating utilizing these funds for the construction of a new full-service senior center to be developed in conjunction with a proposed senior-citizen housing project. 80 24 . Oakview Day Care Center Construction of the Oakview Day Care Center should begin in Spring, 1978 . A site for the facility has been selected, and a lease and management agreement has been completed between the City and Oceanview School District . The firm of Blurock and Partners has been selected to design and coordinate the implementation of the project, and the contract was approved in December, 1977 . 25. Handicapped Mobility The Handicapped Mobility project provides for a program of physical improvements aimed at increasing the mobility of handicapped persons . Meetings between the City and the Mayor 's Advisory Committee for the Handicapped have been completed, and a plan calling for wheel- chair ramps, curb-cuts, special traffic signals and communication equipment has been approved. Environmental clearance has been completed, funding has been released, and project implementation is scheduled for Spring, 1978 . 26 . Rehabilitation Loans r This program, providing rehabilitation loans in target low and moderate income neighborhoods will be implemented in Spring, 1978 , and is the first phase of a four-year program. An RFP for this project was issued in November, 1977, and a contract with the firm of Urban Projects was subsequently approved by the City Council in January, 1978 . 27. Oakview Outreach Program Environmental review of this project has been completed, and funds have been released. Projected implementation is scheduled for r winter, 1978 . 28 . Renovation of City Gym This project will provide recreational facilities for handicapped persons. Representatives from the City and the Parks and Recreation Department have met with the Mayor ' s Advisory Committee for the Handicapped and have structured a program of project priorities and developed an improvement plan. Special equipment funded by this program has been purchased, and program implementation is scheduled for Spring, 1978 . i 29. Del Mar Storm Sewer The first construction phase of the Del Mar Storm Sewer Project was begun in December, 1977, and project completion is scheduled for Spring, 1978 . 30 . Dangerous Building Code Environmental clearance for this project has been completed, funds have been released, and project implementation is scheduled for Spring, 1978 . 81 OMB 6aRI9 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 00 N I-A HOUSEHOLDS BENEFITTING FROM ACTIVITIES UNDERWAY OR COMPLETED-PHYSICAL AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS GRANTEE NAME DATE PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT I HUD GRANT IDENTIFICAT 17 CITY ^F u����T BFA� 1/78 THIS FORM Stephen V. Kohler NUMBER PROJECT/ lJl. 11ViV11iV�iV�.V HOUSEHOLDS SENEFITTING MINORITY HOUSEHOLDS ACTIVITY ID DESCRIPTION BENEFITTING_%OF TOTAL (Zb) NUMBER TYPE TOTAL % LOWER SPANISH/ AMERICAN ALL INCOME SOURCE OR SCALE BLACK AMERICAN INDIANS ORIENTAL OTHER (11 (2a) (2b) (2c) (2d) (3a) (3b) (3c/ (3d/ (3e) 4 B 2062 66 Census Tract 993.02 0.4 4.0 _0.4 0.2 6 B 1275 14 Census Tracts 993.11 0.6 4.0 0.5 0.3 1205 43 992.12 0.5 4.0 1.0 0.2 1399 53 992.14 0.2 3.0 0.9 0.3 1436 43 992.16 0.2 3.0 0.9 0�0 2 3002 44 994.01 0.5 3.0 2.0 0,3 1337 66 99.4.02 0.4 8.0 0.9 0 .2 7 B 2062 66 Census Tract 993.02 0.4 4.0 0.4 0.2 8b B 1337 66 Census Tract 994.02 0.4 8.0 0.9 0.2 13 B 2161 65 Census Tracts 993.03 0.1 4.0 0.09 0.09 1920 46 993.01 0.2 7.0 0.7 0.2 16 A 20 B 1920 46 Census Tract 993.01 0.2 7.0 0.7 0.2 22 B 1574 33 Census Tract 992.15 0.2 2.0 0.8 0.3 24 B 1337 66 Census Tract 994.02 0.4 8.0 0.9 0.2 25 A 27 B 1337 66 Census Tract 994.02 0.4 8.0 0.9 0.2 28 B 2062 66 Census Tract 993.02 0.4 4.0 0.4 0.2 29 B 1399 53 Census Tract 992.14 0.2 3.0 0.9 0.3 Hunt iagton B�ac� 5DeQial,C''Pnsus :,1973. 7 $efn,.�exice SOIlY Ce HUD-e07e.1 (I 7 OMB 63Rib2 U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT I-B POPULATION BENEFITTING FROM ACTIVITIES UNDERWAY OR COMPLETED — SERVICES OR ASSISTANCE GRANTEE NAME DATE PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT HUD GRANT THIS FORM - IDENTIFICATION NO. CITY OF HUNTIMTION BEACH 1/78 Stephen V. Kohler B-78-W-06-0506 POPULATION BENEFITTING MINORTIY POPULATION BENEFITTING % OF TOTAL (2b) AC- TIVITY SPANISH- AMERICAN ID % % LOWER BLACK AMERICAN INDIAN ORIENTAL ALL OTHER NUM- TYPE TOTAL % MALE FEMALE INCOME DER MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE (1) (2al (2b) (2c) (2d) (2e) (3a) (3b) (3c) (3d) (3e) (3I) (38) (3h) (31) (31) 1 A 2 A 1. * 5 B 6143 59.3 .2 NA 5.2 NA 0 NA .4 NA .1 NA 2. * 15 B 6143 59.3 .2 NA 5.2 NA 0 NA .4 NA .1 NA 26 A 3. * 30 B 4344 66 .1 NA 4.0 NA NA .09 NA .09 NA Papa of Pao" HUD-4078 (1-7 00 Hunt Beach Special Census -p1973• Reference Source w 1&2 * � ea: Census TTracts993 b21'- 9'3�02; 99'8 03 inclusive 00 OMB 03RI524 US.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT I-C RELOCATION FUNDED UNDER CDBG NOTE:COMPLETE A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH ACTIVITY LISTED ON FORM HUD-4070 WHICH GENERATED A'RELOCATION WORKLOAD. GRANTEE NAME DATE ACTIVITY NUMBER IMERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS FORM INUO GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1/78 Stephen V. Kohler B-78-M-06-05 06 RELOCATION,BY HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD TOTAL MINORITY WORKLOAD WORKLOAD ITEM DESCRIPTION BLACK SPANISN-AMCRICAN AMl RIC AN IND{AN ORIENTAL ALL OTHER ' MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE I (l E) (I b) (2u) (2b) (2c) Rd) (2e) (2f) (2d) Rh' (2i) i21i * ' TOTAL RELOCATION WORKLOAD 0 0 2 PLACEDIN TEMPORARY NOUSING E ON-SITE b OFF-SITE I I I 3 BALANCE IN WORKLOAD 4 REMObEO PROM WORKLOAD WHEREABOUTS UNKNOWN 5 PERMANENTLY RELOCATED. BY CENSUS TRACT i I a. I b. c d. I I 1 —. f *No project undertaken under the HCD program has resulted in any relocation activities PAGc 0 PAGES Form Approved OMB No. 63-RIS24 s II . Recipient Assessment 24 CFR 570 . 906 (b) (2) • I. Statutory National Objectives The following constitute the general objectives established by Congress for the national program of Community Development Block Grants. It is not anticipated that any one community' s t CD program, in any one year, will deal with each objective. (The local program, of course, remains subject to the assurance, required by law, concerning giving maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low- or moderate-income families or aid in the prevention of elimination of slums or blight) . For each of the following general objectives , check the appropriate box to indicate whether the current program year' s activities do or do not contribute to that objective. Briefly explain, on a separate sheet of paper, all affirmative responses, in- dicating how the current program year' s activities have contributed to each objective. s CD Program Does Does Not Contribute Contribute (1) Elimination of slums and . blight and prevention of blighting influences. X (2) Elimination of conditions s detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare through code enforcement, demolition, interim rehabilitation assistance, and related X activities. (3) Conservation and expansion of the nation' s housing X stock (4) Expansion and improvement of the quanity and quality of community services X (5) More rational utilization of land and other natural resources and better arrangement of needed activity centers X HUD•4080 (1.76) i 85 2 Does Does Not Contribute Contribute (6) Reduction of the isolation of income groups within communities and promotion of an increase in the diversity and vitality of neighborhoods X (7) Restoration and preservation of properties of special value for historic, architectural, or X esthetic reasons. II. Short-Term Objectives Using a separate sheet of paper, list all short-term objectives which are being addressed by this year ' s CD program. (Use the numbers from the previous Community Development Plan Summary: C-1, C-2 , etc. ) . Briefly explain how the current program year ' s activities have contibuted to each objective. For each objective list the numbers of the activities listed on the Progress on Planned Activities (HUD-4070) that contibute to that objective. HUD-4080(1-76) 86 I . Recipient Assessment 40 1 . The community analysis report , completed in September , 1977 , analyzes and documents the need for housing and neighbor- hood assistance in declining residential neighborhoods . The report provides a data base for future housing and neighborhood preservation projects . Loans made to the downtown redevelopment agency work to provide assistance . for feasibility studies directed towards creating an effective program for dealing with the decline of the downtown commercial area and surrounding residential neighborhood . The current year program approaches the problem of blight in two areas (1 ) the rehabilitation program which will target rehabilitation funds into low- and moderate-income nei hborhoods experiencing physical deterioration , and 72) the Dangerous Building Code program which is directed towards bringing downtown commercial structures up to present safety and structural standards . 0 2. See above. 3 . Completed projects addressing this objective include the community analysis report which analyzes the condition of declining neighborhoods, and documents the need for housing assistance. Current year projects directed f towards this area of concern include the proposed acquisition of a site for low-income senior citizen housing scheduled for completion in 1978, and the rehabilitation loan program which will be oriented towards conservation of the existing housing stock and the preservation of declining neighborhoods . This project will be implemented in February, 1978. 4. Considerable progress has been made towards meeting this objective. Improvements to the Senior Citizen Center have been completed and expansion of the facility will be implemented during the current program year. 0 The Oak View Community Center was completed in June , 1977 and is now fully operational , offering a full program of recreation and cultural activities and needed social services . Programs scheduled for the current program year include the construction of the Bushard Community Center and the Oak View Day Care Center and the 16 renovation of the City Gym. 5. This objective has been fulfilled through the provision of community facilities in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods and the expansion of existing activity centers . Projects addressing this concern include the recently completed Oak View Community Center and the 87 completed improvements to the Senior Citizen Center. Projects currently scheduled for implementation include the construction of the Bushard Community Center , the Oak View Day Care Center which will be built adjacent to the existing Oak View Community Center and the expansion of the Senior Citizen Center. 6. Fulfillment of this objective has been actively addressed through both past and current year programs . The recently completed community analysis report provides documentation for neighborhood preservation programs . The completed construction of the Oak View Community Center and the current year Bushard Community Center project provide facilities and services in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods , effectively reducing the isolation of low income groups and ethnic minorities . The current year rehabilitation loans and Dangerous Code enforcement programs are directed towards increasing the vitality of declinging neighborhoods and maintaining a diversity of housing choices . 88 • II. Short-Term (abjectives Cl. Revitalization of Downtown Area Although past years activities have not actively fulfilled this objective, current projects do address this concern. The Dangerous Code Enforcement program will focus on the downtown area, which has a high incidence of structural deficiencies and hazardous buildings, and attennt to bring these up to buidling code safety standards . Loans made to the Redevelopment Agency in the first program year worked to fund revitalization studies for the downtown, and the current year Rehabilitation Loan Program will target low- interest loan monies into downtown residential. neighborhoods. Projects 5,15,26 and 30 address this objective . C2. Community Services Considerable progress has been made towards fulfilling this objective. Specifically, improvements to the Senior Citizen Center have been completed, and .further improvements and additions to the facility are planned. The Oakview Community Center has been completed providing low and moderate income residents with a recreation facility and a full range of social services, and the adjacent Oakview Day Care Center will be under construction during the current program year. Other current year projects addressing this objective include construction of the Bushard Community Center which will provide recreation and service facilities for a low to moderate income area experiencing a high incidence of juvenile-crime related problems , and the renovation of City Gym. Projects addressing this objective include 7, 8B, 10, 12 , 22, 23, 24, and 28. C3. Upgrade Declining Neighborhoods Although no physical progress has been made towards meeting this objective, programs providing a data base for .future projects have been completed. The Community Analysis Report, completed in September, 1977 , provides documentation for rehabilitation efforts, and loans to the Redevelopment Agency have provided impetus for studies addressing the problem of blight in the downtown area. Current year programs addressing this area of concern include the Rehabilitation Loan Program and the Dangerous Code Enforcement Program. Projects addressing this objective include 3 ,5,15 ,26 , and 30 . r r 89 C4 . Improve Critical Public Facilities Completed projects fulfilling this objective include the improvement and replacement of substandard water facilities in the downtown - townlot neighborhood, and the completion of the first construction phase of the Oldtown Storm-Sewer Project. Current year projects addressing this objective include the second construction phase of the Oldtown Storm- Sewer and the first phase of construction on the Del Mar Storm-Sewer Project. Projects 4 ,13 ,20, and 29 address this objective. C5. Provision of Public Facilities in Key Commercial and Industrial Area None of the D,ro7ectsfunded under past year or current year programs directly address this objective . C6 . Provision of Facilities and Necessary Related Services to the Elderly and Handicapped This objective has been actively addressed through both completed and planned HCD activities. The installation of wheelchair ramps, completed in September, 1976 , and the current year Handicapped Mobility project work to eliminate physical barriers for handicapped persons, . The recently completed improvements to the Senior Citizen Center and currently planned expansion of the Senior' s facility work to expand the scope and level of services available to the elderly. The current year senior citizen housing site acquisition will provide a location for the construction of low-income housing for the elderly. Projects 6 , 7 , 12 , 21, 23 and 25 contribute to the fulfillment of this objective. C8 . Park and Recreation Facilities in Critica?1 Neighborhoods The provision of recreation facilities in low and moderate income target neighborhoods has been actively addressed in both past year and current year programs. The recently completed Oakview Community Center provides needed recreation facilities in a target neighborhood, and the current year Bushard Community Center project will provide for the construction of a multiple-use recreation facility in an area with a high juvenile crime rate. Other projects addressing this objective include the completed improvements to the Senior Citizen Center and current year expansion of the facility, and the renovation of City Gym, planned for comp- letion during the current program year. Projects 7 ,8b,10,12 , 22 ,23 and 28 contribute to this objective. 90 • III-A HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROVIDED Narrative Report • 1. Steps to Meet HAP Goals: • The City of Huntington Beach HAP goals utilize both existing units and new construction. The administration of the HAP existing program, by agreement, is the responsibility of the Orange County Housing Authority. No financial commitment has yet been received for Section 8 New Construction Units. 2. Steps Taken to Improve Ability to Meet HAP Goals: The City of Huntington Beach funded a Tenant Relations Officer to work under the auspices of the Orange Housing * Authority and work exclusively in Huntington Beach for calendar year 1976. The City also received a pre- selected site designation for Section 8 New Construction Units. 3 . Problems Encountered: Fair market rents were too low until HUD raised them. Too much emphasis was placed on the elderly in the first year, therefore, the second year application places less emphasis on the elderly. The existing unit program has worked well in the City, however, the agreement with Orange County Housing Authority for a full-time tenant relations officer came under criticism by two civic groups within the City and the City Council acted to not renew the agreement for calendar year 1977 . 91 U.S.DEPARTMENT Of HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 111-A HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROVIDED ORANTEa NAME OAT• ►EnSON WHO CAN NEST ANSWER VO GRANT 1U NO. OUENTION,ASOUT THIS FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH �_78-MC-06-05 1/78 Stephen V. Kohler 6 TOTAL ELDERLY OR HANDICAPPED /1.2 Persons) OCCUPIED TYPES AND SOURCES Of A65ISTANCE COM OCC V- COM ---- -'—-- - -- GOAL MITTED ►ISO GOAL MIT TWO MI HANDI- TOTAL NORITY CAPPED (fE) I1 D) /lot (gal 12b) (20 12d) 12e) A. NEW RENTAL UNITE: i 1. Section a-HUD 285 J0 285 State A nc -Total f5mm of lines a If b a. Section 8 b. Other _ 3. Other Assisted Now Rental Housing (Identify) Total b. -- - - - --- -- 4. Total: (Sum of lines 1,2,Ili 3) 2 8 5 285 B. REHABILITATION Of RENTAL UNITE: 1. Section 8-HUD L 2. State Agency-Total(Sum of lines a d b) _ a. Section 8 b. Other 3. Other Assisted Reltabilitatioa of Rental Housing (Identify) Total a. — --- - b. 4. Total (Sum of lines 1, 2, d 3) �Jf �fi J0 J0 J J0 C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITE: 1. Section 8-HUD 12 6 7 730 , 338 3 3 5 347 192 Unkn Unk 2. State AgencyTotal(Sum o/lints a d b/ -__ --._- a. Section 8 -- - b. Other 3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing (ldenrify/ Total _ -_-- - — - b. --- — - - -- - 4. Total(sum of lines 1, 2, d 3) 1267 730 338 335 347 192 Unkff Unk D.REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOME- OWNERS OR PROHECTIVE HOMEOWNERS 1. CD Block Grants 200 7 5 2. section 43S 3. Other RehabMtation Asalslance to Owners t1deittifyJ Total b. 4. Total(p um of fines 1, 2,A 3) 200 00 E. NEW CtN ISTRUCTION AMMANCE TO HOME- OtW1ERi OR►ROMICTIVE HOMEOWNERS: 1. Sectiots 235 ,0 jo J J0 J0 2. Other f1dentijyj Tow b. 3. Total(Sum of lines 1 +2) ALL HOUSING ASSISTANCE (S.RI o111Ra AI.tW.CI.D/.ad a'31 1752 7 3 0 3 3 8 695 1347 192 �nkn unk PEN I o/ 2 HUD-4076(1.76) 92 oref NO.ee WIG" UAL OMPAX 61".0/NONMIM AM UNMAN NV4144PINGMT 111-A NOUN NG ANWANN PI40VIM ONANTSM NANG IPOWMMWWWGWANOWM L-78=MC—n6—nrq1 YO*WANT IS NO. MIST A~vww P"m CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEAC 1/78 Stephen V. Kohler 6 MI• PAMILY LAMW PALV N.w poo w fs fr own Peruse) TYPOS ANO OONIIOMM OP ANWANOf *"WPM& SOW Dow r7A w A T ' A Ali YtTTq TrVAL INOwIT iwos A.MW MNTAL{MITOt rX rX • 1. swum stun 10 � 3. staa ANWAIP16161 Mum of MAP#f&b IL estate 11 b.Odw 3 Oebo AMiYIed New Rend MSfIIIiIM f1hw11t1 Total ,. 4. Tod fdrfl of knee I.!.f41.11 �f p, M. NMNAMUTATION OP AMNTAL UNITMs I. lostion s—MUD S 3. Naa -Tod Aw of Iwo a!1 L Motlao s ►.Otlw 3.Otber Amiss/Rel obOlatlo.of RMd Novelly(Idewt*) Total R rx 4. Total t$um of lbws 1.J.A 3/ P C. 11XMTIa1M MMNTAL 1MNT6 1. soetio.$—BUD 679 186 55 53197 1 91 unkn 3. SUN -Tow *m—o Al► A. b. 3. Other AuYai t RMO Rental Yev,Yy fldexAM Total b. 4. Teal f3um of Mw«1._.M !/ 67 186 55 unkn unkn 53 197 91 O ItMNAMUTATION AMMTANOM TO NOMM• ow"m on PIIOMPMcnvM NOt4MOIwMNN 10 fly fQ fly J0 25 1. CD lioeb Ganta 2. Mestio.335 3. Odw aWwbWtattan Anted w to Ow.ere (IdeRAW Tod a. b.4. Total fSNw of Mwu 1.1,A 3) 1 i0cQf ,00 0 J0 25 M.1001 OOIMTIIUCTIt1N ASMMTAI M To MOMMIM1106- on o11 PacwsaTIVM ttoMsowNMM+ 1.:fade.13s 0 0 0 0 3. Tod S. Tod flw+N Mwse 1 +t) J0 �J ALL NOtMN AMMM►ANge Paw of&W A4.M4 041M Got 881 1279 111861 55 unkn_unkni 2 7197 91 unknij Per a«a. - NUONN t1•st1 93 OMB 63RIS HUD GRANT IDENTIFICATION NO U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT B-7P-MC-06-0506 III-B LOCATION OF UNITS WITH FINANCIAL COMMITMENT (Alruch .tlup) SMSA CODE - NUMBER OF UNITS F—FAMILY E—ELDERLY CENSUS TRACT TOTAL NEW REHABILITATION EXISTING (ol Ib) (c) (d) (�l 9 2 1 1 6 Family, 4 Elderly 9 9 2 1 2 19 1 Family, 8 Elderly 9 9 2 1 3 5 4 Family, 1 Elderly 9 9 2 1 4 2 2 Elderly I 9 9 2 1 5 36 28 Family, 8 Elderly 9 9 2 1 6 2 2 Elderly 9 9 2 1 7 'o 9 9 2 1 8 2 1 Family 1 Elderly 9 9 2 1 9 5 2 Family 3 Elderly 9 9 3 0 (1 32 15 Family,17 Elderly 9 9 3 0 2 48 7 Family, 41 Elderl-, 9 9 3 0 3 38 16 Family,2? Elder 9 9 4 0 1 30 10 Family 20 Elderl; 9 9 4 0 2 58 9 Family,29 Elder, 9 4 0 3 21 r2 Family, 9 Elderly 9 4 0 4 2 2 Elderly 9 4 0 7 1 1 Family 9 4 0 8 2 2 Family 9 1 0 3 1 Family, 2Elderly OM91 41RIG24 HUD GRANT IDENTIFICATION NO, U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT B-78—MC-06-0506 III-B LOCATION OF UNITS WITH FINANCIAL COMMITMENT (Attach Map) SMSA CODE NUMBER OF UNITS F—FAMILY E—ELDERLY CENSUS TRACT TOTAL NEW REHA6ILITATION EXISTING lal (A) 10 (d) f�1 9 9 4- 0 5 1 1 Family 9 9 4 0 6 0 8 Elderly 9 9 6 0 2 3 3 Family 9 9 6 0 3 4 -4 Familv 9 9 6 0 4 1 1 Family 9 9 6 0 5 9 3 Family, 6 Elderly LTI MUD-4069 11•7G; 73 y-4 &A ,)96.03 996.04 F—1 P61- F-3, 997.0 994.00 8-E E'l d erly20 F-2 1-F 994.05 994.01 992.11 995-01 Family -2 El(�IcurlY-2 9 �.R Y2 CN y 2 9 UAIER 997.02 - 6 F 3 9 97 0 9:9, c)j N')4 4.09 tJ 994.02 f,j I de r ly-9 L A Family -12 B.US "J94.03 992 14 GAkFIE(D )IJ3.01 J-der Ly-' 2 Lilderl, -2 F 1(1(1 C TY 17 992.13 2 . .. .. ....... YORKTOWN a M y- 15 �'amily -28 E-1 2.15 8 992.1f, ...... k N ADA.5 1.�lderlY-3 Elder I vl >i i Family- 2 Family-- 1' INDIANAPOOS 992.18 �192.1,9 w;,-,41 ATLANTA 993.03 "A411 ON 992.20 992.21 LOCATION OF ASSISTED HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE census tracts 1973 special census 96 Form Appr3vej OMB Vc. 53-R1524 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT IV.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS GRANTEE NAMF _ DATE PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH January, 1978 ABOUT THIS FORM Stephen V. Kohler WHEN EIS REQUIRED CONDITIONED STATUS OF DATE OF PROJECT AND DATE ENVIRON- ENVIRON- DATE DATE NO ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORIC CERTIFICATION ACTIVITY MENTAL REVIEW MENTAL DRAFT EIS FINAL EIS REVIEW NECESSARY PRESERVA• TO HUD PER HUD FUND DESCRIPTION STARTED REVIEW TO CEO TO CEO PER 24 C F R 58.19(c) TION 24 CFR 58.30 RELEASE DATE (�) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) 1 2/1/76 No EIS NA NO 4/76 NA 2 12/76 No EIS NA NO 2/4/76 NA - 3 2/76 No EIS NA NO 4/76 NA 4 12/75 No EIS NA NO 2/4/76 NA 5 No EIS NA NO 6 2/l/76 No EIS NA NO 4/76 NA 7 12/75 No EIS NA NO 2/4/76 NA 8 (A) 10/75 No EIS NA NO 2/4/76 NA 8 (B) 10/75 No EIS NA NO 2/4/76 NA 9 No EIS NA NO 10 10/76 No EIS NA NO 7/77 8/77 11 Dropped No EIS NA NO NA NA 12 6/1/77 No EIS NA NO 10/26/77 NA 13 5/76 EIS Re NA NO 8/17/76 9/8/76 uired 14 8/76 No EIS NA NO 9/10/76 10/29/76 15 8/76 No EIS NA NO 9/10/76 10/29/76 16 5/76 No EIS NA NO 8/17/76 9/8/76 18 Dropped No EIS NA NO NA NA Page 1 of 2 HUD-475 (1.76' lD Form Approved OMB No. 63-R1524 �O OD U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT IV.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS GRANTEE NAMF _ DATE PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS FORM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH January, 1978 Stephen V. Kohler WHEN EIS REQUIRED CONDITIONED STATUS OF DATE OF PROJECT AND DATE ENVIRON- ENVIRON- DATE DATE NO ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORIC CERTIFICATION ACTIVITY MENTAL REVIEW MENTAL DRAFT EIS FINAL EIS REVIEW NECESSARY PRESER`/A- TO HUD PER HUD FUND DESCRIPTION STARTED REVIEW TO CEQ TO CEQ PER 24 CFR 58.19(c) TION 24 CFR 58.30 RELEASE DATE (1) (2) (3) (4) (S) (6) (7) (8) (9) 20 5/76 EIS Re- YES NO 10/6/77 quired 21 10/31/77 No EIS NA NO 22 10/10/77 No EIS NA NO 23 10/31/77 No EIS NA NO 24 10/10/77 No EIS NA NO 25 10/31/77 No EIS NA NO 26 10/10/77 No EIS NA NO 27 10/31/77 No EIS NA NO 28 10/31/77 No EIs NA NO 29 9/77 No EIS NA NO 10/6/77 30 11/1/77 No EIS NA NO Page 2 of 2 HUD-4075 (1-76� , Form Approved OMB No 63•R1524 V-A. Equal Opportunity in CDBG Programs or Activities 24 CFR 570.900(c)(1 ) • 1 . Indicate the person who can best answer questions regarding this section. NAME STEPHEN V. KOHLER (714) 536-5549 Phone • TITLE Housing and Community Development Specialist ADDRESS 2000 Main Street, P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach CA. 92648 (Room #) • 2. For each program area (e.g. , parks, public works , water and sewer) in which there are activities funded by CD Block Grants, summarize on a separate sheet of paper: (a) the steps that have been taken to identify low- and moderate-income . minority needs as they may be greater than those of the low- and moderate-income population in general , and (b) the actions that have been taken to correct conditions which may have limited minority participation or benefits in the past. For example, if CDBG funds are used for the development of neighborhood parks and playgrounds, the recipient shall summarize the steps that have been taken to identify the extent to which minority households have access to parks/playgroun.as compared to non-minority households (comparing persons per acre, extent and condition of facilities , etc. ) and if disparities are found, a summary of the efforts underway to correct these conditions and assure equal opportunity for minorities to enjoy the benefits of that program area. 3. On a separate sheet of paper, list and very briefly summarize each study funded under Section 570.200 (a)(12) . For each study; (1 ) describe how the activities under consideration relate to the provision of equal opportunities in the delivery of facilities and services for minorities and women. , (2) describe any actions recommended to correct effects of conditions which may have resulted in limited opportunities for minorities or women in the subject area and, (3) describe actions needed to assure equal opportunity in the future. i HUD•4081 i 1 76, 99 Equal Opportunity 2 (a) . (b) . Parks and Community Center: A comprehensive survey and analysis of recreation facilities throughout the city indicated that those census tracts with high concentrations of low and moderate income -families generally had a correspohdinrrl' 1 igh rate of persons per acre of recreation area. The HCD program has been oriented towards rectifying this situation, and the city has allocated $100,000 of first year funds, 109 , 000 of second year funds and 209,000 of the third year entitlement for the provision of recreation facilities in targeted low-income minority neighborhoods. Projects funded in this area include the Bushard Community Center and Oakview Community Center. Area residents have participated in the design of these facilities, and in the case of the recently completed Oakview Center, have been actively involved in the structuring of activity programs and social services . Public Works: Programs funded under this heading are primarily directed towards facilities for the handicapped and the elderly, elimination of flooding and street tree problems. No special analysis of minority problems have been made. Water and Sewer Facilities: The Townlot water project is located in a census tract with a high concentration of lower income persons, but these are primarily elderly. There are no significant concentrations of minority persons in this project area. Assistance to orange County Housing Authority: A Tentant Relations Officer was funded from first and second year entitlements, and has greatly improved housing assistance for low and moderate income miniority persons, and in assuring equal opportunity in the provision of housing. 100 • Equal Opportunity 3. Community Analysis Report: This activity has worked to analyze and document areas of the community which are experiencing blight and deterioration, targeting neighborhoods needing rehabilitation assistance. Although program alternatives presented in this study do not specifically deal with women and minority groups, census data and previous analysis generally indicate a correlation between • areas targeted for rehabilitation assistance and high concentrations of low and moderate income minority persons, and female--headed households. Preliminary rehabilitation programs and supportive data provide information relating to the provision of equal opportunity in housing and employment opportunities, and will assist the City in structuring programs directed towards assuring equal opportuni- ties for women and minority groups. • • • • • • 101 Form Approved OMB No. 63•RIS24 V-B. Fair Housing (24 CFR 570.900(c)(2)) 1 . By executing the Certificate of Assurance for Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, the recipient has agreed to administer its programs relating to housing and urban development in a man- ner to affirmatively further fair housing. (Activities under this category need not be limited to those funded under CD Block Grants. ) Listed below are areas of particular concern in which specific actions can be taken to provide for greater housing opportunities throughout the locality for minorities and women. For the areas of concern listed below: a. Check those in which studies or actions have been undertaken during the program year. b. On a separate sheet of paper, summarize the specific study or activity and briefly describe the results and recommenda- tions of the study or the effects of the action. As an example, a locality might examine the pattern of multi-family zoning to determine its effect on minorities. The recipient would check "zoning", and note on the separate sheet that a study was undertaken to determine the effects of current multi-family zoning on minorities. The results of the study could be summarized , for example, "the pattern of zoning tends to further the concentration of minorities in the locality because the bulk of the multi- family zoning is in, or adjacent to, minority communities , rather than located throughout the locality. " If the study recommends actions, such as dispersing multi-family housing, these recommenda- tions must be summarized. Zoning Building Codes Housing Codes X Land Use Planning, Policy and Implementation Development Program Planning. Policy (including Site Selection Policies) , and Implementation X Public Facilities X Housing X Other (Speci fyAssure minority partipipatign igissisted housing 2. Complete Form V-C , "Action to Prevent Discrimination in the Sale, Rental and Financing of Housing , " ( HUD-4072 ) . HUD•4082 (1.76) 102 • Fair Housing Land Use Planning Policy and Implementation (1) Redevelopment studies: In the initial studies and preparation of a Downtown Redevelopment Plan, a review of the exisiting and projected housing situation in the downtown area was conducted. These studies are directed towards targeting areas for the construction of multi-family housing, and allocating a portion of these for low to moderate income and minority families. • Public Facilities (1) Oakview Community Center: Construction has been recently completed on the Oakview Community Center. The Center provides recreation and community facilities in a neighborhood with a high cop4tration of low and moderate income minority persons. The new facility provides a recreation facility as well as a full range. of social service programs. (2) Oakview Day Care Center: Scheduled for construction during the current program year, the Day Care Center will provide pre"school facilities in a low to moderate income neighborhood with a high concentration of minorities and female-headed households. Housing • (1) Rehabilitation loans: This program, scheduled for implementation during the current program year, provides for housing rehabilitation funds, subsidized loans and self-help programs in low and moderate income neighborhoods, including areas with high concentrations of minority households. • Assure Minority Participation in Assisted Housing (1) First and second year funds were utilized to contract with the Orange County Housing Authority for a full-time tenant relations officer. The tenant relations officer helped to assure that all • members of the community had fair and equal access to the housing assistance program. • • • 103 Form .Approved - 01YB No. 63-P152- O U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT V—C ACTION TO PREVENT DISCRIMINATION IN THE SALE, RENTAL, AND FINANCING OF HOUSING GRANTEE NAME DATE PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUEST ONS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ABOUT THIS FORM January, 1978 Stephen V. Kohler CODE NUMBER OF SPECIFIC ACTIONS TO PREVENT STAFF PERSON REPONSIBLE DOLLAR VALUE DISCRIMINATION UNDERTAKEN DURING PROGRAM YEAR AND/OR CONTRACTOR OF STAFF TIME AND/OR CONTRACT J ACCOMPLISHMENTS (Il (2) (3) (a) Contract with Orange County Housing Stephen Kohler-Planning $10 , 000. 00 Placed minority Authority to assist low income Devartment`nrange Count], households in minority persons. 1975-1976 . Housing Authority-Con- section & tractor housing • Rehabilitationloan program - Stephen Kohler-Planning $100, 000 .00 Assist minority targeting rehabilitation assistance Department ($700 , 000-4 Yrs.) households in to low income minority persons. home improve- 1977-1978 - (First phase of a ments/rehabil- four-year project) itation • PAGE OF PAGES HUD-4072 (9-76) Form Approved OMB No. 63•R1524 V-D. Entrepreneurship & Employment • 1 . The grantee is required in the Section 3 Regulations (24 CFR 135 Subparts B and C) to utilize lower income area residents to the greatest extent feasible as trainees and employees and to require . contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. a. Is there a method for assuring that the contractors and sub- contractors are meeting the requirements of Subparts B and C, above? X Yes No b. Summarize on a eanarata sheet, the results of contractors' and subcontractors' efforts to utilize project area residents. (Results of recipient efforts are included in VG-Form 4074. ) 2. The grantee is required in the Section 3 Regulations (24 CFR 135 Subpart D) to award, to the greatest extent feasible, contracts for work in connection with CDBG funded projects to business con- cerns located within the Section 3 covered project area or business concerns owned in substantial part by persons residing in the Section 3 covered area; and to require contractors and subcontrac- tors to do likewise. Grantees, recipients, contractors and sub- contractors are required to develop an Affirmative Action Plan (AAP) for utilization of eligible Section 3 businesses. a. Has an affirmative action plan for the utilization of Sec- tion 3 businesses been developed? Yes x No Plan is presently being developed b. Does the plan include a method for assuring that each Con- tractor and Subcontractor has developed and is implementing any AAP for the utilization of Section 3 businesses? Plan is presently being developed Yes x No C. Summarize on a separate sheet. the results of contractors' and subcontractors' progress in utilizing Section 3 businesses, i .e. , number and dollar amount in relation to total amount. (Results of grantee efforts are included in V-G Form 4074 . ) 3. The grantee is encouraged in Federal Management Circular 74-7, Attachment A, to utilize minority banks for demand and/or time accounts. Are there any minority owned commercial banks in the locality? No Minority savings and thrift institutions? No. If yes, haVAAgrantee accounts been opened in any of these insti- tutions.' Describe briefly. • HUV-4083(1.76) • 105 Enterpreneurship and Employment 1 (b) Projects have all required contractors with specific abilities which, combined with short construction times, have precluded training and utilization of area residents. Contractors have been required to employ area residents where possible and feasible. 2 (a) The City Personnel Department is presently considering an affirmative action plan for the utilization of section 3 businesses to submit bids on projects. 2 (c) Specialized nature of work, and lack of section 8 businesses in locality precluded utilizing section 8 businesses and contractors. 106 Form Aoao. d OMB No.63-'11524 NAME OF CITY URS.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HUNTINGTON BEACH V-E TITLE I ASSISTED PRIME CONTRACTS OVER $10,000 DATF Janu ary, 1978 JULY 1975 - JANUARY 1978 AGENCY OR UNIT OF GOVERNMENT (SpeafyPe�corrai HCD DIV. PLANNING -DEPARTMEha PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS FORM HUD GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER STEPHEN KOHLER B-78-M-06-0506 SPECIFY TYPE OF WORK j SPECIFY DOLLAR VALUE OF CONTRACT IN t'�`110 N- DATE APPROPRIATE COLUMN � UNDER THE APPROPRIATE ELIGIBLE COLUMN V m NAME OF CONTRACTOR OF SECTION 3 COMPETITIVE MINORITY FEMALE ii AWARD OVER$10.000 $100.000 BUSINESS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONSTRUC. SUP- SER. O YES NO TION PLIES VICES (I UN DER f100,000 OR MORE (1) 1 (2) (3) (4a) (4b) (5) (60) (6b) (7) (81 (90) (9bi (90 Rede elop- Urban Projects, Inc. /3/ 32, 500. 00 X ment Plan 10850 Wilshire Blvd. re a atior. 3 L.A. CA. 76 _ 4 N-D-L Const, Co. 8/3/ Const ucti P.0 gox 2365 76 29,673. 00 I X Wheel char ra ps La $a ra, CA, 5 Kordick & Sons, Inc, 9/27 706 ,629 . 19 Const uct P.O. Box 16485 76 (300, 000 HCD) Storm pewqrs Speini 1 o Const.Co. Water Fac lity 2 100 Riverside AAvenue 1/76 (50, 00 H Impro eme is Coronodo CA, I 76 (50, 000 HCD)I X lHous 'ng 1 Orange County Housing 12/9 10, 000. 00 i X ! IAssi tant Authority 75 er 6 IR.L. Stelrecht 10/2 / Constr ct � 16521 Graham St. 63,658 . 00 X ommun' tylCent r 76 j 92649 I� I i jCUMULATIVE TOTALS I $196,127. 00 $ 706. 629.19 f z5 41 4 z i2-1 L I HU0-4073,9 75, PAGE _I _CF 2 _PAGES J N 0 pro Form Approved OMB No.63-RIS24 NAME OF CITY V�,S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Huntington Beach V-E 717LE I ASSISTED PRIME CONTRACTS OVER $10,000 r,AtF L7CQ January 1978 _ JULY 1975 - JANUARY 1978 AGENCY OR UNIT OF GOVERNMENT (Spwfy Period covered) H PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS FORM Stephen Kohler NUO GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SPECIFY TYPE OF WORK > SPECIFY DOLLAR VALUE OF CONTRACT IN L hh , /) 'V' `V 'V' rV' UNDER THE APPROPRIATE f Q DATE APPROPRIATE COLUMN 3 Iy ELIGIBLE COLUMN U m NAME OF CONTRACTOR OF Iy f SECTION COMPETITIVE MINORITY FEMALE i Z AWARD OVER$10,000 $100.000 BUSINESS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONSTRUC- SUP- SER- O U UNDER f100,000 OR MORE YES NO TION PLIES VICES (1) (2) (3) 1 (4a) (4b) (S) (6a) (6b) (7) 18) (9a) (9b) (9c) Robert J. Rodino Assoc 4/18 Community 1047 Gayley Ave. 77 18, 200. 00 x Analysis 7 Suite 201 L.A. CA t 8 Bebek Const. Co. 10/2 / 606, 080, 00 X Storm Irvine, CA. 77 ewer 9 Channel Const. Co. 10/2 / Storm Irwindale CA. 77 220, 904 . 00 X Sewer 10 Blurock & Partners 112/19/ I Arc hi ewport Beach, CA. 77 30, 067 i t� al services es I I 11 rban Projects 2/6/ ster lestwood, CA. 7 32,500 Rehab-loan progr I I CUMULATIVE TOTALS i5 276, 894 . 10 � ,533 ,613 . 1 _ _4 x z : 2 x 1 I — HUD4077 i9-75� PAGE __2_OF_.__2___PAGES Form App. .j OMB No.63•R 524 NAME OF rITV U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Huntington Beach V-F TITLE 1 ASSISTED SUB-CONTRACTS-OVER $10,000. DATA January, 1978 AGENCY OR UNIT OF GOVERNMENT Jul 1975 - :Januar 1978 Planning Department Y Y PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWEv QUESTIONS (Specify period covered) ABOUT THIS FORM NAME OF CONTRACTOR DATE OF AWARD HUD GRANT IOEMTIFiCAT N NUMBER Kordick and Sons, Inc. 9/27/76 B_78_ SPECIFY ME OF WORK SPECIFY DOLLAR VALUE OF CONTRACT IN 10 {J) V) ?Q APPRO-RUTE CCLUMv ELIGIBLE UNDER THE APPROPRIATE U I DATE COLUMN 111 j NAME OF SUB-CONTRACTOR RACTOR OF SECTION 3 MINORITY FEMALE zO z i AWARD OVER$10,000 $100.000 BUSINESS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONSTRUC- SUP- SER- _ U i UNDER S100=1 OR MORE TN PLIES VICES (3) ({a) (6b) (S) (6) (71 (8a) (8bi (2') Fontana Steel Company Storm e 1 17190 Valley Blvd. g767/ 14,000.00 Steel orkT Fontana, Calif. i I 1 � i I i jI I CUMULATIVE TOTALS 514,000•00 S PAGE 10F 3 PA:; S HLID4073.1 15751 D N 0 Foam Appowe OM8 No.63-RIS24 NAME OF CITY U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HUNTINGTON BEACH V-F TITLE I ASSISTED SUB-CONTRACTS OVER$10,000 DATE January, 1978 AGENCY OR UNIT Of GOVERNMENT JULY 1975 - JANUARY 1978 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PERSON WHO CAN BEST ANSWER QUESTIONS (SFecI/y period eompd) ABOUT THIS FORM Ste hen V. Kohler NAME Of CONTRACTOR gEBEK COMPANY DATE OF AWARD HUD GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF > I SPECIFY DOLLAR VALUE OF CONTRACT IN �y/,r , L440SPECIFYTY►E PROMIK 1.E APPROPRIATE COLUMN UFOER THE Af►RO►q IATE ELIGIBLE e I DATE COLUMN U E I NAME Of SUBCONTRACTOR OF SECTION S MINORITY FEMALE O= i AWARD OVER$IOAW SIDD,000 BUSINESS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONSTRUC- SUP- SER- U UNDER 810MM OR MORE TEfN PLIES VICES O) (2) (3) (mil (E6) (S) (6) (7) (SA) (86) (Ec) 1 Century Paving, Norwalk, CA. 37 , 000. 00 Pavi 21 Robert B. Longway 1 Hacienda Heights, CA. 20,730.00 Struc ur 1 i i CUMULATIVE TOTALS $ 71,730. 00 5 z x j # k 2 Q ' HUD-4073' �975 PAGE—2 OF 3 PA.:ES Fam Appr ored OMB No.6 3-RIS24 NAME OF CITY U.S-DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Huntington Beach V-F TITLE I ASSISTED SUB-CONTRACTS OVER S10,00Q ft— January 1978 AGENCY OR UNIT OF GOVERNMENT July 1975 - January 1978 Planning Department PERSON WHO CAN REST ANSWER QUESTIONS (Specify Period covered) ABOUT THIS FORM Stepben V. Kohler NAME OF CONTRACTOR DATE OF AWARD MUD GRANT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER Channel Construction Company _ SPECIFY TYPE OF WORK > I SPECIFY DOLLAR VALUE OF CONTRACT IN L hkA I ON I DATE APPROPRIATE COLUMN ry'ELIGIBLE COLUMN APPROPRIATE yUl I NAME OF SUBCONTRACTOR OF SECTION 3 MINORITY FEMALE i i AWARD OVER S10A00 S100.m BUSINESS CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONSTRUC- SUP- SER- U UNDER$100AW OR MORE TION DUES VICES (1) 1 (2) (3) (40) (4b) (S) (6) (7) (80) (8b) 18c) 1 Alcorn Const. Co. 11/8/ 6,230,40 Fen ing Sun Valley, Ca. 77 2 iPenhall Const. Co. 1/8/ 15,000.00 Con ete 77 Rem al i I I � I • f i t � I CUMULATIVE TOTALS s 92,960.40 ISa " 2 r PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES HUO-4072• '375. F...1 Fa N OME NO.a7R-1l31 NAME OF GRANTEE GATE ►ERSON WHO CAN VIEST ANSWER QUESTIONS^SOUT THIS FORM HUD GRANT 10 MO- City of Hunt in on Beach 1/78 Stephen V. Kohler B-78 MC-06-0506 V-0 Redisla t Eengtaymanet Title I Racipient departments,panics,and units of Total Non-Minoriry Black Sperlish-American Anwrican Indian Oriental Aft Otfw Minorities governnMnt. M • • emal• Met* 1= • F•mN• MN• F-.14 Fermat. Ne • A. All Employeae se of (Start of hognm) Imonthlyaer) 1. Under S7,S00 l 2. $7,500-S9,999 3. $10.000-S12,499 4. $12,500-$15,000 S. Over$15.1700 B. Total Number Hired-Start of►ropam to Data of Report 1. Under S7,500 2 2. S7,500-$9,999 3. $10.000-$12,499 4. $12.500-$15,000 5. OWa$15,000 C.Total Number Fired or Resigned(DesgrMte whether feed or resigned)Start of Program to Deteof Report 1. Under$7,500 2. $7,500-S9,999 3. $10,000-$12,499 4. 512,500-S15,000 5. OVer S15,000 D.Total Number Promoted'(by new salary) Start of Program to Date of Report 1. Undo,$7,500 2. S7,500-$9,999 3. $10,000-S1 2,499 4. $12,500-S15,000 S. Over$15,000 E. Total Number Section 3 Residents Employed- Start of Program to Date of Rpon(Do Trot include employees listed under••F•',Training Programs) 1. Under S7,500 2. S7,500-S9,999 3. S10,000-$12,499 4- $12,500-S15,000 5. Own S15,000 F. Total Number Entering into Training Programs- Start of Program to Date of Ripon(h'ore thou 1. Under S7.500 _ 2. S7,500-S9,999 3. $10 000-S 12.499 4. 57 2 500-$*'Mo 5 0Vet$15.000 ' -Goer not.nCluae.n 9rede or meat increases HUDZ0 4 " Form Approved • 0t.1(3 No. 63•R1524 VI. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION • Except where indicated your responses should reflect experience during the past program year rather than the one for which you are applying. A. As a contact point, identify the city department, organization, agency, or individual responsible for developing and implementing the Citizen • Participation Plan and maintaining the records required by 24 CFR 570.907(b). Name Stephen Kohler Title Housing and Connmity Development Specialsit Organization City of Huntington Beach Address 2000 Main Street - P.O. Box 190 • Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 B. 1 . At what point in the development of the application were citizens likely to be affected by community development and housing activities, including low income persons: (a) provided information on the commu- • nity development and housing programs including the amount of funds available (24 CFR 570.900(d)(1 )(i )); (b) afforded an opportunity to articulate needs, express preferences about program activities, assist in the, selection of priorities and participate in the development of the application (24 CFR 570.900(d)(2)); (c) provided information on other important program requirements such as Davis-Bacon, environ- • ment, equal opportunity, and relocation (24 CFR 570.900(d)(1 )(iv)) ; and (d) provided bi-lingual opportunities, when appropriate (24 CFR 570.900(d)(2))? (See attached narrative) • • • • HUD-4079 (1-76) • 113 -2- 2. Were meetings, other than formal hearings, utilized? Yes x No If yes, for what purposes? (See attached narrative) 3. In what ways, if any, are the activities described in 1 and 2 above being changed for the next program year? (See attached narrative) C. 1 . When during the planning process, and how often, were public hearings held (24 CFR 570.900(d)(1 )(ii ))? (See attached narrative) 2. For each hearing held, indicate the purpose. (See attached narrative) 3. Describe any changes planned or actions taken to modify the hearing process for subsequent years' activities and the desired results. (See attached narrative) HUD-4079 (1.76) 114 • -3- D. What provisions have been made for citizen participation in budget • and/or program revisions, changes, or amendments (24 CFR 570.900(d) (1 )(v)? (See attached narrative) • E. When were citizens advised of HUD's acceptance of your application for processing and of the availability of the application to interested parties (24 CFR 570.300(b))? (See attached narrative) • F. Cite any key issues relating to your Community Development Program, including the Housing Assistance Plan, where you feel citizen partici- pation was a significant element in the outcome. • (See attached narrative) • • • • HUD-4079 (1-76) • � l C VI . Citizen Participation B1. (a) Due to time constraints encountered in formulating the first year program, the prime mechanisms for citizens participation were a series of public meetings held before the Planning Commission and City Council. Letters of invitation and notification of these meetings were sent to major civic, political, service and social organizations throughout the City, and notifications were placed in all local newspapers advertising and outlining meetings, and encouraging public attendance. Following these initial meetings, another series of public hearings were held to solicit input on the formulation of three-year program objectives. These meetings were also advertised in local newspapers, and notices were included in monthly water bills sent out to approximately 35, 000 households. In the initial stages of the second year program a Citizens Advisory Committee was formed as a means of more actively soliciting citizen involvement in the HCD program formulation process. The Citizens Advisory Committee holds numerous meetings during the program formulation process, and acts to disseminate information regarding the program as well as soliciting citizen input. Meetings are held in HCD target neighborhoods, these meetings acting to inform low and moderate income persons of the program. Information regarding the program, and the amount of funding available, is provided through these meetings, through publi- cations in local newspapers and other public notices, and through community centers. (b) The primary mechanisms for citizen participation are public hearings held before the City Council and Planning Commission, and the Citizens Advisory Committee. Prior to the initial formulation of each year' s program a Citizens Advisory Com- mittee is appointed by the City Council. At the same time, in- formation regarding the program is made available in target neighborhoods, and area residents are encouraged to become actively involved in the citizen committee' s work. The Citizens Advisory Committee holds meetings from August to November each year to review and recommend project proposals and funding allocations to the City Council, and to meet and confer with neighborhood groups regarding the program and the specific needs and problems of neighborhood residents. Other public hearings involving citizens in the program formation process include Planning Commission meetings during which the Citizens Advisory recommendations are reviewed, and City Council meetings which provide a public forum for input and comments on the draft and final applications . 116 • (c) Information regarding important program requirements is provided through local news media, by target neighborhood community center staff personnel, and through regularly scheduled neighborhood meetings held by the Citizens Advisory Committee during the pro- gram formulation process . • (d) Target area neighborhood centers presently have bilingual staff personnel, and these act to provide bilingual opportunities when necessary. B2 . • Meetings other than formal hearings were held by the Citizens Advisory Committee meeting with different neighborhood groupstand the Human Resources Council . These meetings were oriented towards generating a broader understanding of the Block Grant Program, evaluating the problems and needs of local groups and target neighborhood residents , • and soliciting a broader base of citizen involvement. B3 . In the preparation of the Third Year Application, 31 local civic organizations were contacted to advise them of the HCD Program and • to encourage staff presentations at their regular meetings . In ad- dition, the Citizens Advisory Committee membership was expanded in the Third and Fourth program years to include not only representatives of local civic organizations but citizens-at-large as well . The Citizens Advisory Committee met eight times during the Fourth Year Application formulation and six times for the Third Year program, • while there were only two meetings during the preparation of the second year application. Cl . After the Citizens Advisory Committee completes their review of the Community Development Program, and makes recommendations on the Community Development Budget, a public hearing is held before the Planning Commission, and the Council. C2 . • The purpose of the Planning Commission public hearing is to allow the Commission to review the recommendations of the Citizens Advisory Committee and hear comments on the draft Housing and Community Development Block Grant Application. • The first City Council public hearing is intended to provide a forum for public comments on the draft application. The second City Coucil public hearing affords the Council the opportunity to consider the Citizens Advisory Committee' s recommendations , Planning Commission review, and all public input before approving the final application. • • 117 (D) . With the exception of increased participation by the public through the Citizens Advisory Committee, there are no plans to significantly alter the public hearing process for future grant applications . To date, the City of Huntington Beach has made only minor adjustments to past year ' s Community Development Program. Each of these amendments has constituted less than 10 percent of any years ' entitlement. Therefore, no HUD review of these amendments has been necessary, how- ever, each of these amendments has been approved by the City Council at a public meeting in an effort to allow the community at large to be aware of, and have the opportunity to comment on, Community Development Program amendments. (E) • Through the publication of the environmental review documents the public is made aware that the current year Housing and Community Development Block Grant Application is available for distribution. (F) , As a direct result of citizen participation through the Citizens Advisory Committee, and public hearings before the Planning Commission and Citv Council, the Housing Assistance Plan was amended to include a goal of 185 Section 8 new construction housing units for the elderly. Senior citizens also expressed their desire for improvements to the Senior Citizens Recreation Center and $50 , 000 was included in the Second Year Community Development Budget to finance these improve- ments . This open citizen participation is a significant element in the outcome of the Housing and Community Development Program. 118 FOURTH YEAR HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE NARRATIVE REPORT The Housing and Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee received 29 applications for HCDA funds from a variety of interest groups. The Committee hereby makes known its reasons for not including on its prioritization list the following applications: • 1. Street Lighting (Oakview vicinity) Department of Public Works Cost: $1, 400, 000 The project would have used all of the City' s 4th year HCDA funds. Therefore, it was declared unfeasible. Further, the Department in- formed us that this and the next two projects should be done after the installation of the Cypress/Ash Storm Sewer. 2. Street Lighting (Oakview Only) Department of Public Works Cost: $100,000 As the result of 1. above being declared unfeasible, the Department submitted a second application for a scaled down project. The Committee was then informed by the Department that an Edison owned system could be installed for free instead with overhead wires and pole hung lights, if the City guarantees maintenance and energy costs (app. $20 , 000 per year) for 3 years. Both Citizens and the Department expressed the need for street lights in this area, in part to deter crime. The Committee recommends that the Council request the Department of Public Works to negotiate with Edison for the timely installation of overhead lights. This Committee also recommends that the City determine after some appropriate period of time (1-2 years) the effect on crime of the Edison lights. If warranted, the Committee recommends for 6th year funding a first class lighting system. 3 . Oakview Street Improvements Department of Public Works Cost: $300,000 As stAted in 1. above, this work should be done after the installation of the Cypress/Ash Storm Sewer. Further, existing right-of-way problems need to be resolved. This Committee also determined that the call for HCDA funds to do this work resulted from the City' s not collecting fees for said improvements from developers during past years. We have been informed by the Department that this policy has now changed - fees will be collected. We recommend that after installation of the sewer and resolution of right-of- way problems, that this project be funded by fees collected augmented by HCDA funds. 4. Senior Citizen Mobile Home Park Council on Aging Cost: $300, 000 The Committee' s decision to omit this project was based on: a) lack of specific site; b) lack of guarantee that funds could be expended during program year; c) questionable eligibility; and d) need for a study to determine the best way to utilize HCDA funds to provide housing for seniors. 1? q Page Two 5. Marina Center/Library Recreation, Parks and Human Services Department Cost: $500,000 Not eligible. This project does not meet the "maximum feasible priority for low- and moderate-income families" criteria of HUD, which requires that at least 50% of residents be of low-income. Feasibility. Project is feasible to implement if it were eligible. 6. Oakview Juvenile Diversion Foundation for Educational and Behavorial Therapy Inc. Cost: $52 ,000 Although the Community and this Committee supports this and the next two projects and recommends their future funding, they are Not eligible. The revised "Consolidated Block Grant Regulations" stipulates that any services must document previous unsuccessful application to federal or State agencies, that normally provide funds for such services . No such previous application exists for these services , therefore, this is not an eligible activity. 7. Oakview Juvenile Diversion Foundation for Educational and Behavorial Therapy Inc. Cost: $26, 000 8. Oakview Liaison Person Oakview Community Cost: $15,000 9 . Community Swimming Pool Recreation, Parks and Human Services Cost: $328, 600 Not eligible. This facility will provide for swimming classes at the Oceanview High School and as such will constitute an education facility and is specifically exempt under the HCD Program. It would also provide a community-wide facility and would more than incidentally be used by residents from neighborhoods other than the one in which it is located and is also exempt for these reasons. 10. Murdy Center Addition American Association of Retired Persons Cost: $50, 000 Not eligible. The subject area is not an HCD Target Area and the tract does not meet the "maximum feasible priority for low- and moderate income families" criteria of HUD. The following were submitted by the Library, but were declared ineligible. 11. Place-a-book $50, 000 12 . Mail-a-book $50, 000 14 . Cart-a-book $30, 000 120 Page Three Comments to be included with recommended project: . 1. Main Street Village. This Committee would like to see the Downtown area cleaned up and rehabilitated. Therefore, we recommend the ex- penditure of these funds to improve the area' s infrastructure without precluding any potential design. Furthermore, we recommend the ex- penditure of 5th and 6th year HCDA funds, as appropriate, to continue this work. 2. Neighborhood Preservation Program. This Committee recommends the expenditure of 5th and 6th year HCDA funds to maximize the benefits of this program. 3. Oldtown Storm Sewer. This Committee was informed by the Department that funds for this project will be forthcoming from the City. 4. 17th and Orange Traffic Signal. This Committee understands seniors in this area have higher priority needs than this signal. They stated that flooding in the area is a severe problem. 1 5. Computer Aided Medical Dispatch System. This Committee suggests that: a) the Fire Department utilize existing City-owned terminals to start this program; b) that the cost of the terminal is excessive; and, c) that the Department first institute the other two programs, Smoke Detectors and Vial-of-Life, recommended for funding. 6. Lake Street Fire Station. This Committee recognizes the need for a new fire station to replace the existing. We recommend a plan be created for this station using 5th year HCDA funds, hopefully after the Lake Street widening issue is resolved. 7. Oakview Center Recreation Improvements. The input of local residents at the Committee' s meeting at the Oakview Center indicated the need for play areas for small children, a back-board, and family recreation facilities to improve the outdoor recreation opportunities at the Center. The Committee recommends that these suggestions be incorpor- ated in the final plan for these facilities. 8. Newland House. To help the Newland House to become self-sufficient and to promote historic preservation, this Committee recommends the allocation of $25 ,000 for the provision of a parking lot. Further- more, the Committee recommends that the uncommitted $6,000 from the fourth year entitlement be allocated to the Newland House for struc- tural or interior improvements. 121