Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnnexation Number 1 - Exchange of Property between the City �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK a' . . .. Titij of 1protminow CIVIC CENTEKL 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 714 CODE 893-4511 February 14 , 1974 Mrs. Al. cia .Wentworth ' City -:Clerk City' of 'Huntington Beach Huntington Beach,` Ca, 926,48 ' Dear Alicia: Subject- Re solution'No._-1527 Enclosed is a certified.''copy`pf Resolution -,No.,, 1527 to be, submitted to the Board of;_,Supervisors, on -our`'boundary exchange along with your�Resoaution apprdVing the exchange of ro P Perty . Good luck-; r -Sincerely.= yours- CITY.,-OF WESTMINSTER F I I i i I / , Katharine C Harper`r ,.' City, Clerk KCH:o cc : Planning Department Enclosure i i m I I r' 1 R"PIS'OUITION , O VEL i C_ AGENCY FORMATION C SSIOI! 2 :Ct}L': dA=OTI,I� 3 October 310 1973 4 On motion of Commissioner Reinhardt. duly seconded and 5 carried, the following resolution was adapted. 6 W WakS,, after 'due notice provided by lava a public hearing 7 wa.e -held by this Commission on a proposed annexation to the City .of 8 Huntington Beach designated Hun►ington Center Annexation'116. 1; and 9 'WR tr S, by action of the City Council of the city of 10 Huntington Beach application was filed with this Commission requesting 11 approval of a proposed transfer of territory from the City of Westminster 12 to the City of Huntington Beach;., and 13 I�MRUS* said application was accompanied by a statement of 14 action of the City Council of the City of Westminster .agreeing to this- 15 proposed transfer of territory. in exchange for a transfer of territory 16 from the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster,. 17 NOW, TWWORE, IT IS I F EBY RESOLVED that the boundaries 18 of the territory proposed to be .detached from the Ci tJ` of tJcatmi.nstsr 19 and annexed to the City of Huntington Beach are more specifically 20 described in that certain legal .description entitled Huntington Center 21 Annexation No. l (Transfer of territory from the City of Westminster to 22 the City of. Huntington Beach) attached hereto and by this reference 23 made a. part hereof; and ' 24 --- BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED that said Annexation i.s hereby 25 approved. 26 . AYES: OOMISSIOMS LGUIS R. REINHARDT, STAN NORTHRUP, ROFMZT J 27 N M- -Lf RO -T W. BATTIlt 28 COMMISSIONERS .NONE 29 ABSENT: COMMISS104NMZS NONE 30 fi 31 32 Resolution 73-17� _ - 1 STATE OP CALIFORNIA � 2 COUN'TY' OF OgAg SS* 3 a RICH= T. VJRNMj EXecutive Officer of the Local Agency- 4 .Fo=ation Co ission- of -Orange. Countyq C li ornia, hereby .certify that; 51 the bove nnd foregoi - Resolu�ion was duly snd regularly adopted by 6 said Ccmiissfon 'at z s regular meeting thereof, held on the 331-st day of Cctcabert ' 73» -8 IN .WMESa-14 �rov, . I have Y hereunto set my hand this 31st 9 d. y.of October, 1973,: 11 Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Cootdission 12 of 'Orange County, California ww �. : By 13 1 . e eery 15 16 47 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - 26 27 _28 29 30 31 32 Resiolution oo 73-17 2. �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 3788 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO TRANSFER CERTAIN TERRITORY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER AND CONSENTING TO THE TRANS- FER OF CERTAIN TERRI`1•'ORY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER TO THE CITY OF HUNi'INGTON BEACH WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster both propose to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city; and Government Code Section 35271 provides that proceedings to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city are initiated by filing with the Board of Supervisors of the county in Which the -cities are situated a resolution of the legislative body of the city in which the territory is situa- ted and a resolution of consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative' body .of the city in which the territory is situated; and Each transfer of territory has been approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that the territory located in the City of Huntington Beach set forth in Exhibit A, be transferred to the City of Westminster. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the. City of Huntington. Beach that it consents to the transfer of the terri- tory located in the City of Westminster set forth in Exhibit B , to the City of Huntington Beach . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach file a copy of the resolution with the Board of Supervisors of ,tne County of Orange and the City Council of the City of Westminster and with any other appropriate govern- mental agency to carry out the transfers herein set forth and er 1. ask that the Board of Supervisors - of the County of Orange set the matters for hearing. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of November, 1973.` Mayor ATTEST: City clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ti ty Attor y 2. RESOLUTION NO. "3861 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .TO TRANSFER CERTAIN TERRITORY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER AND .CONSENTING TO THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN TERRITORY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER TO THE. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WHEREAS, the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster both propose to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city; and Government Code Section 35271 provides that proceedings to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city are initiated by filing with the Board of Supervisors of the county in which the cites are situated a resolution of the legislative body of the city in which the territory is situated and a resolution of consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative body of the city in which the territory is situated; and Each transfer of territory has been approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach that the territory located in the City of Huntington Beach set forth in Exhibit A, be transferred to the City of Westminster. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of i Huntington Beach that it consents to the transfer of the terri- tory located in the City of Westminster set forth in Exhibit B, to the City of Huntington Beach. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach file a copy of the resolution with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange and the City Council of the City of Westminster and with any other appropriate govern- mental agency to carry out the transfers herein set forth and I WM: lm 1• i I ask that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange set i the matters for hearing. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of April, 1974. 0 Ma r i ATTEST: let City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attor ey 2 . Res. No. 3861 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly appointed, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven; that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of April 19 74 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs , Matney, Wieder, Dukes Coen NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK PROPOSED HUNTINGTON CENTER ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH That portion of the northeast one-quarter of the southeast one-quarter of Section 14 , Township 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Las Bolsas , presently in the City of �- Westminster, County of Orange , State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51 , page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows : Beginning at the southwest corner of said northeast one-quarter, said corner being at an angle point in the present common boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach as described in North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686 of the city of Huntington Beach, certified by the Secretary of State May 9 , 1958 , and the city of Westminster as described in Annexation. No. 18 , Ordinance No. 1120 of the city of. Westminster, certified by the Secretary..of State October 22 , 1959 ; thence north 0°16 ' 26 " east 557 .05. feet along the west line of said northeast one-quarter and the before mentioned common Citys boundary line to its intersection with the southwesterly right of way line of the San Diego Freeway Route 405 as shown on a map recorded in Book 3 , page 24 of State Highway map books in the office of the County Recorder's office of said County; thence leaving the before mentioned Citys common boundary and following along said freeway right of way line south 45023 '11" east 223 .28 feet; thence continuing along said freeway right of way south 45°59 ' 03" east 572 .91 feet to its intersection with the south line of said northeast one-quarter also being the common boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach and the city of Westminster; thence north 89031 ' 06" west 580 . 78 feet along said south line and said common boundary line to the Point of Beginning. i EXHIBIT "A" P a rQ 1 FtiCs zorr� �r, QM 15 s - ' -)ECTIONAI DISTRICT MAP 14--5-1 jc TMY . 0-p "Cold* �-- JL •. t17• tOWQ• l/Gf^.Cr .-. � 'r � L�Zsat9 4'_Z"3 l?'L"1B3 ��.Si r•;,. ..,..•a.. r..�.-. IT f�} 9 1�•y`'T��^JI .$yj , 1 EA �(q{/'���ox—dy�t � f.i.iJ �7ioo �i , \J .i. J. 7 �..A J`1 1.3.01 NI `a,�a+.•r<s+.1•t.Y bt•w. • D•i7•u fts . .16 RAIN?CE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _ � -i. ,),� �t•-�.•...._....�..... : . �-D•vt •rsl wa j.=&Y ZONE CAS: �f 7f Isla 2•ti-71 Kli �ti9,i31'sWi.Ml.li•1D,iD•)ilt-�Oi./'!•aii.1f 70-i.Ti-)� �-9-79 Y01 \a•• 8:tSA 1'::'J;'G j,�irrl � - t 1 _� �tj � y o � u , R! �•�l'aw y _ t t1 ri 1 R1 c C4 ; CF-E ` i ii �!!.�"•rt!•t ;�;,. R1�-- 1:_ ., R1 1 } R;_ ..�..e, CA C c—Y f2� 3 'i' _ r itmaaolu'o.e,ra' •.- tu. .;. e AVE .... oral" 11 t♦ EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 2 • " I f PROPOSED HEIL-MAGNOLIA ANNEXATION NO. 54 TO THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER That portion of the northeast one-quarter of the southeast one-quarter of Section 24 , Township 5 South, Range 11 West, and that portion of the northwest one-quarter of the southwest one- quarter of Section 19 , Township 5 South, Range 10 West, all. in the Rancho Los Bolsas , presently in the city- of Huntington Beach, County of Orange , State of California, as shown- on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the _ County Recorder of said County, described as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the easterly extension of a line parallel with and 20 .00 feet southerly, measured at right angles from the north line .of said northeast one-quarter with a line parallel with and 30 . 00 feet easterly, measured at right angles from the east line of said northeast one-quarter, .said point of intersection being an angle point in the present City boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach as described in "Northeast No. 1 Annexatio ".-­.r`,rdinance No. 588 .of the city of Huntington Beach, also << being an angle point in the present City boundary line of the city of Westmins eras described in "Annexation No. 31" Ordinance No. 1171 of the city of Westminster and also a point on the present City boundary line of the city of Fountain Valley as described in "Annexation 1" Resolution No. .1005 of the city of Fountain Valley; thence soutl"i 0'19 '46"west 1126.85 feet along the before mentioned parallel also being the present common boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach and the city of Fountain Valley to its intersection with the centerline of the San Diego Freeway Route 405 as shown on a map recorded in Book 4, Page 49 of State Highway Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence leaving the last mentioned .common .City boundary lines and following along said freeway centerline north 44101146" west 1277.64 feet to a curve concave to the southwest having a radius. of 12,Q00 . 00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve and freeway EXHIBIT "B" Page l centerline thru a central angle of 102754" an arch distance of 306 . 84 feet to a non-tangent line parallel with and 20 .00 feet southerly, measured -at right angles , from the north line of said northeast one-quarter, said line also being the present i1 common City boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach and I the city of Westminster as described in the before mentioned respective ordinances , thence south 89030 ' 10" east 1110 .56 feet along said parallel line and its easterly extension, to the Point of Beginning. i EXHIBIT "B" P acre 2 Cor 10 N A L D1STRIC MAP 4--5- 1 w ulT L. Y .�•��,• Ov .. MOIL a1T9 [OYetK Aa Du•a+,Ct e0 •17 r.~ aat�ctg S✓"4 . L3 G�1 II•z�a r.�..�.....• l LGlt.O > _ >•?OY% ail 1-4"1 tier Y•.• 1` q•2•o! ate 1.1•R HN (•:j ..•tea a,r•"-S."J. eh,r. ` rt•i•f2 ..rs a"T' -ITn B Iq A LI j� '� r '�• (��( \ f T �{ t� ;� j� $ '!-7-6J py� �e.;eeoYr.r+. ..•w.t. ,t!'r 3LL l3 j� V dJ •C V iJ lYt ,i p ��1.3..3O it�ijlt"il ••.f-a. - ws� �.S'J....... w.+*.a. r.•a• a-ta•N was (I;�•�'fs e.+•w.•...•nwvs+s.•r.• 1/`O•M Kvl � 5V!:'%CED SAP IONE CASE: 12•f•a4 /,Cot II.,1?,t�e•2J.2n.1U,ial=lt ysa..A7,UR•TII..fa,70l.♦•.fa s - ••D•.a3 1.12 :r+4.6.2.fSa-•�.af•1i,o 9-34X M-e11-24. til-i.a0. 1121ra of w $i79I1Y ILGSwO -Il ....eef•...a a....s r ia,ew .4 f-i d'f t� }��.,� ..��..,,11,,rr1//,� ♦. s v"-.r w ... 'e a..•"I-ft- r_ ECi7i R t 4..+ J"iflfil 1•+�:,"�- � ♦r C - »t� ...le�.__"'�-•,- ---- !!! r- � , It • n-.. r�rv;.A r,,. �� IL R 3 a f 1 R3 JT.P4 All C 2 #{ � a s • ` f i o . Rl Rl+ IN RD ri f; t RI Pi Rt RI'Int Rt f RI RI t t �C`Q �- -i � i �� RI Rl Rl t' i r,o. RI Rl • t � aa.i.r a �i RI � i (il Z. C 4 r Ri Rl y I •t r C,R,; „ J Ri , cc:-E p' At Rl a Rt e••t roe i { �� : ''l.s"7 IRt�.. r't! ri =/ PI q., RI �'� RJ j i3i ` i' � RI Lj Rl , . •,t fff��V"'11��, r,i �t i �"_St � Rl ` R1 f i �� J t i (l _ -- .^CA; 1tt i `f Via ' t U lL�;l `N`RJ Rl Y' Rl �� W p i 1 l?S l•un.,�t.v:r •/ (—R} r,���lY^;—w—�.! Ft _ :::.�1� t .i C2 j L, , MCHIBIT "B" !J RESOLUTION NO. 1511 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER TO TRANSFER CERTAIN TERRITORY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CONSENTING TO -THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN TERRITORY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO THE CITY OF r WESTMINSTER. i WHEREAS , the City of Westminster and the City of Huntington Beach both propose to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city; and Government Code Section 35271 provides that proceedings to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city are initiated. by filing with the Board of Supervisors of the county in which the cities are situated a resolution of the legislative body of the city in which the territory is situated and a resolu- tion of- consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative body of the city in which the. territory is situated; and Each transfer of territory has been approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Westminster that the territory located in the City of Westminster set forth in Exhibit "A" , be transferred to the City of Huntington Beach. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City . of Westminster that it consents to. the transfer of the territory located in the City of Huntington Beach set forth in Exhibit "B" , to the C .ty of Westminster. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of Westminster file a copy of the resolution with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange and the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach and with any other appropriate govern- mental agency to carry out the transfers herein set forth and ask that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange set the matters for hearing. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this llth day of December P 1973, by the following vote: AYES : COUNCILMEN: ANTHONY, FRY, GILLESPIE, JARRETT, NEUGEBAUER NOES : COUNCILMEN: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: NODE Mayor ATTEST : I City Clerk ?STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss . COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I , ,KATHARINE C. HARPER, hereby certify that I am the duly appointed and acting City Clerk of the City of Westminster; that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City .of• Westminster at a regular meeting thereof held on the llth day of December , 1973. City Clerk of the City of Westminst-er �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. �1527 I" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER TO TRANSFER CERTAIN TERRITORY i LOCATED IN THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND CONSENTING TO THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN TERRITORY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH TO THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER. WHEREAS, the City of Westminster and the City "of �. Huntington Beach both propose to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city; and j Government Code Section 35271 provides that proceedings to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city are !' initiated by filing with the Board of Supervisors of the county in which the cities are situated a resolution of the legislative body of the city in which the territory , is situated and a resolu- tion of consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative body of the city in which the territory is " situated; and e Each transfer of territory has been approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission, NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Westminster that the territory located in the City of Westminster set forth in Exhibit "A," be transferred to the City of Huntington Beach. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Westminster that it consents to the transfer of the territory 4. located in the City of Huntington Beach set forth in Exhibit "B, " to the City of Westminster. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk of the City of Westminster file a copy of the resolution with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange and the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach and with any other appropriate govern- mental agency to carryout the transfers herein set forth and ' ask that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange set r the matters for hearing. F PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of February, 1974 , by the following vote,: AYES: COUNCILMEN: ANTHONY, FRY; GILLESPIE, JARRETT, NEUGEBAUER NOES : COUNCILMEN: NONE ABSENT: COUNCILMEN : NONE s Ls/ Philip, L. Anthony ;t Mayor ATTEST: PROPOSED HEIL-MAGNOLIA ANNEXATION NO. 54 TO THE CITY ,OF WESTM�NSTER (TRANSFER OF TERRITORY FROM CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH) That portion of the northeast one-quarter of the southeast one- quarter of Section 24, Township 5 South, Range 11 West, and that portion of the northwest one-quarter of the southwest one-quarter of Section 19, Tonwship 5 South, Range 10 West, all in the Rancho Las Bolsas, presently in the City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the easterly extension of a line parallel with and 20. 00 feet southerly, measured at right angles from the north line of said northeast one-quarter with a line parallel with and 30.00 feet easterly, measured at right angles from the east line of said northeast one-quarter, said point of intersection being an angle point in the present City boundary line of the ' City of Huntington Beach. as described in "Northeast No. 1 Annexation" Ordinance Na: 688 of the City of Huntington Beach, also being an angle point in the present City boundary line of the City of Westminster as described in "Annexation . No. 31" Ordinance No. 1171 of the City of Westminster and also a point on the present City boundary line of the City of Fountain Valley as described in "Incorporation" of the City of Fountain Valley; thence south 0° 19' 46" west 1126. 86 feet along the before mentioned parallel line, also being the present common boundary line of the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Fountain Valley to its intersection with the centerline of the San Diego Freeway Route 405 as shown on a map filed in Book 4, Page 49 of State Highway Map BooKs in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence leaving the last mentioned common City boundary lines and following along said freeway centerline north 440 01' 46" west 1277.64 feet to a curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 12,000.00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve and freeway centerline thru a central angle of 1° 27' 54" an arc distance of 306.84 feet to a non-tangent line parallel with, and 20.00 feet southerly, measured at right angles, from the north line of said north- east one-quarter, said line also being the present common City boundary line, of the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster as EXHIBIT A r� described in the before mentioned respective ordinances, thence south 89. 30' 10" east 1110.56 feet along said parallel line andits easterly extension, to the Point of Beginning. Page -2- EXHIBIT A PROPOSED H :NTINGTON CMUR AvvEXATIO:J ri0. 1 TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH That portion of the northeast oae-quarter of t1he southeast one-quarter of Section 14, Township 5 South, Rang,g_ ll West, in the Raacho Las 89lsaa, presently In the city of Westminster, County oZ Orange, State of California, as sho m on a map recorded in Book 51, page 13 of Miscellaneous Flaps in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows; Beginning at the southwest corner of said northeast one-quarter, said corner being an angle point in the present cornon boundary line of the city of Huatingtota Beach as described in North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 585 of the city of Huntington Beach, certified by the Secretary of State kMay 9, 1958, and the city of Westminster as described in Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120 of the city { of Westminster, certified by the Secretary of State October 22, 1959; thence north 0016126" east 557.05 feet along the west line of said northeast one-quarter and the before mentioned common Citys boundary line to its intersection with the south- -a-_3 terly right of %my line of the Snn Diego Freeway Route 405 as s iown on a map j recorded in Book 3, page 24 of State Hig'r.4ay map books in the office of the County Recorders office of said County; thence leaving the before mentioned Citys common boundary and following along said freeway right of ;say line south 45*23.11" east 2.23.28 feet; thence continuing along said freeway right of spay south 45°59103" east 572.91 feet to its intersection with the south line of said northeast one-quarter also being the comnon boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach and the city os Westminster; thence north 89°31106" west 530.78 feat along said south line and sai+1 comon boundary line to the Point of Beginning. EMIBIT B ,S'E Cf IC�NAL DISTRIC"•� MAP 24-5- { '� re0rg +;4r rworrco ♦cplwr It! fflM «w x�i.r•.�ow�~.A w fires..,.• " GTt' COu pEee, OAOIr6nwret e•li wA ;...t....•►• ...n.o•.e cp,j. CITY OF "' " 0e�a A tam accel o 0-144f 1W, q•4'4e •ro x•V.m f►)I (�,+� fwwt t«w••a Ast+•e Wsrw T. a + ve 'or?HUNTINGTON BEACH #•N•n e61x �•. . a. 4-R1•♦x oe6 O•i•TE Nr� �•�ts..e.r•w.«f sf�f*faf .. ORANGE (:OUNTY, CALIFORNIAx-Ir•.. '�.� ���.,v 1� 1.-.. 10)e AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: ♦ s-N 1.41 tit•T•H IeQ• "&'oss,".RA.aN,Et T,Elq !l7,3v1,SST,A)i.670.410,30!,/o.1m A•of e!)T lM.i.N•t1►Or-u.s1-}lJOPU•11.►t•H. a•a•s� e!r! rr6 M ttOU•0 Am I I �/ qd �'7�I Ri y A.l -"CVftE ar f'.e/t M•4.M_�+.r EDWGEN Av vile C2 i .. 4 N C 2' R 3 o 7i f i - R3 4 2 ' fo R3 r, .• »1 W j 4 U w D 'r 0 URf c z Pr Rt RI - ♦ • } Rr• RI RI RI RI RI RI RI RI Rt RI J RI s J R1 C 4 � ou" o CH ` ,.u„ u•.af"ti� i .•��.. • J o'' R1 RI R1 RI 1 R! I t .- $ .• n,o� c.e Rt w•e+ a RI 0 Y'ia to . Z"Rl oR RI R1 RIC4 . RIr /sir w• s c^ RI R ".R.' RI i R! 1ri '• RI a� RI I •ram (M.lt .:4T ".:M h;:..ri rj W.. Tot 1. 111 Il T Rry RI RI u ^4Lfll / $1��� a RI J J I Cr Ri RI if RI d RI j RIRt c p r:w { , 'cA 6y+trr oA •..ETr Da J 3� Rt RI RI RI RI u ! H I Rl C6 x .S COY: a•. c. R1 r is �Cs CI RI I c^ _-- CRCF'E Z R3 RI RI ra+ .i.. RI v- -�RS •IAA At�,o-:a:.»;rr b s R3 ri ! Ji 'RI • , sA ^ CZ. rc�A'Gcw CA RI 1 1vARNSR AVE i • • } SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14-5f-11 R N^,JTE ;�•"�. CITY OF R 690/iE0 JUNt 34.•f s0 0•s.{ram+l o �, r...,r. a CITY COUMCy, O#OIM/YCE MO 796 t.FGFNO HUNTING f � �j ACH f'" ••0-61 790 ck.! .wr! ►n $,s ■,,,;.Jar. `�,// L 1.3-61 411 LC.�w}rs.Ce.WI ; f bsrKl 3 30•1 •it 6}ts+Ks r,�a 3•IT•31 •t1 11316T IJT) 1.t,C,rP-•.�•..r•.,,. ,,1,lar•••h�,:•.,.• oRANGL COUNTY, CALIFORNIA '_'•'" �.. �:�hrk8lhlh/I w•.f4 Mi!M.t 1•,•Tl IT„ 4MC1fDE0 OY ZONE CASE _. + -ii 14 Ic al IR5• GCLSA AVE �•a,pr,tu.f•3.16T,ss•63,a3aa•�,-u6•n-s�>.,rao-6,YldR i•e-» ��oa 1 RI of ' RI RI RI <{ RI z ♦. RI { r t N • y ! � Z � a CAI ��•i °-r RI ' 6 RI C4 C4 CF-EbA CENT f -•�;� f l.•Sri i.1 flC9�' ( C_'i IA1. i21 4n ! W MtWfrC J:_:Y.S�,• I C,Q •..o•10'fD-t-af C 2 u a.ru'ai y-fe.f• � � � o.A aa'•f'f.no Z M fl 4 p WW.-•f0s v O � i J C4 rr•Ova M'..,fa 1: f O „So sl•serof N'.-sal s+' f,.•. AD " EDINGER , AVE ;..f ,,.. �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK x A ins .t t W111 7%. a Office of Edmund (3. )Brown 3r. �5 armrg of gitatt SACRAMENTO I, EIIMUND G. ,BROWN JR., Secretary of State of the State of California, hereby certify: That on the 28th day of October, 1974, there was. filed in this office a certified copy of Resolution No. 74-1313, adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Orange County on September 11, 1974, approving the transfer of certain territory from the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster and the transfer of certain territory from the City of Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I execute this certificate and affix the Great ,Seat of the State of California this -3-Okh day of October,- 1974: Secretary of state R� � y X Cat CORRECTED CERTIFICATE BY /till MAIL TO C7ork of thO 'O O EXEMPT A wig >•:r /r £ z 1r ..ao._.� ,0, RECORDED IN OFFICIAL R(wt;fJ" " ."`s. � OF, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOR iA . NOV��'19�IR Pas 1.4% �.!E"WILYLE,C 011 f},Roca' 1�r Zdoiund . )Brown 3r. .�.. $erretarm of Stott SACRAMENTO I, .EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Secretary of State of the State. of California, hereby certify: That on the 28th day. of October, 1974,. there was filed in this office a certified copy of Resolution No. 74-1313, adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Orange County on September 11, 19741,. approving the transfer of certain territory from the City of Huntington Beach . to the City of Westminster and the transfer of certain i territory from the City of Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I execute. this certificate and affix the Great SeaZ of the State of CaZifornia thistoj& { h daze op Octo'er, 197 t� 6, bb df fv � " 1 sm'Nr. Secretary of State j � � »s. Ya� i� I�A Z4�A4 ie J"i♦C,,?J F, �(�3� .J y` ' ' m I CORRECTED CERTIFICATE. I I I �Tl�,d FE1l'OF TE�I�/TO.Q�F�o.r� Cirj/O.�-,��ti�r�/✓c rO.�/e�,�t c.�� s'C,4L E \ ;✓o�rr�EQsrco,Q/✓E�.�E \ c/rf/of�sry//.✓srE,P ciry.eouc%�,Q ,oE,e \ ANi✓E,(dT/ON r✓°3/O.QQ//1/A/✓CE/l/O//J/ ��� \ NO�TiS/EAST/✓°/d/✓NE IAT/U�OQQ//✓Ai✓CE�688 I 90 o o /r 30 d C PE9 0 67 eo S9 411zz-�f- ZN y : ft o � � z�3Ao� Oo to n , cell'Of kZ4Vr1NVM/✓06#Chl -'"4?0,VN0.44Y A�4 seLarH w 3.4**,f'Ar/ON, aOd?N,4CL N°666 �`- - C/lY enf K.�Sfl!/MS'rEN c'.;'r . � .IA4YE.4A.'/L�N,'V'/B, OrPOi,4.4n�C.! ;1'•//?U ,'� 10, �1�1�r ."144 A•I I av + r J, r,- i . IE i + 4i 9 _ REALTY INVESTMENT COMPANY >M k ST COAST HIGHWAY BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 no: j 714-645-1260 February 11, 1975 Mrs. Alicia Wentworth City Clark City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box '190 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Door Mrs. Wentworth: On 5/21/74 we paid the City of Huntington Beach $480 00 license fees for the Casa Tiempo apartments for the period of 7/1/74 to 6/30/75. On October 30, 1974, we were transferred to the City of Westminster, which, incidentally, was not our desire. It is requested, therefore, that fees paid the City of Huntington Beach be refunded for the period of 10/30/74 to 6/30/75, or a total refund of $321.33. Cordially, Roger Turner ��- 9T:ee dd: Don Brennan License Div. f G Clerk of the Board 1129 1 PS I CBS 1 'IN. E. ST JOHN, County Clerk RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS y _DrputY 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 3 September 11, 1974 4 5 On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and carried, the 6 following Resolution was adopted: 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 74-968 of this Board, and 8 after due notice as provided by law, a hearing before this Board was 9 held this date, involving the proposed transfer of territory, a legal 10 description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A, " from the 11 City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster; and the proposed 12 transfer of territory, a legal description of which is attached hereto I 13 marked Exhibit "B, " from the City of Westminster to the City of 14 Huntington Beach; and J , ZZ 1S WHEREAS, any protests to said transfers were heard and passed W 16 upon, and ZZ , 0 17 WHEREAS, a majority protest has not been made, v ° 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the above transfers 19 of territory are hereby approved, without election. 20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board is directed 21 to enter upon the minutes of this Boara, certify and transmit to the 22 Secretary of State and to the legislative bodies of the affected cities, 23 copies of this Resolution. 24 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board is directed 25 to record with the Orange County Recorder an affidavit of completion 26 pursuant to Government Code 534080. 27 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk is directed to make the 28 necessary filings with the State Board of Equalization pursuant to 29 Government Code §54900. 30 31 32 ITB:ks Resolution No. 74-1313 Transfers of Territory; Cities F oisz-i.z Huntington Beach & Westminster 1 _ �G fe 6K 11291 FG I C;87 1 AYES : SUPERVISORS DAVID L. BAKER, RALPH A. DIEDRICH, R. W. BATTIN AND RALPH B. CLARK 2 NOES : SUPERVISORS NONE 3 ABSENT: SUPERVISORS NONE 4 5 STATE OF CALIFORN LA ) ss. 6 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 7 I, WILLIAM E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the 8 Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, hereby certify that 9 the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the 10 said Board at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11 h day of 11 September 1974 , and passed by a unanimous vote of said 12 Board . 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 14 llth day of September , 1974 J > 15 WILLIAM E. ST JOHN County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk , W 16 of the Board of Supervisors of LL ozz Orange County, California 0 0 1.7 18 By Deputy 19 �. 20 21 22 �. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 F 01 92-24 - 2 cR5 �3 M1 v�0 u i� ♦ r.� . ♦ f s rx r Px f /t m zs- P a > a f A 9s 1 ^ p �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK �I r , l i AFFIDAVIT OF Co,',IPLETION 2 31 I, WILLIAM E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex-of.ficio Clerk of } � the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, hereby certify 5 as follows : 6i 1. Attached hereto, Exhibit "A, " is a certified copy of Resolution i 71 No. 74-1313 of the Board of Supervisors of Orange -County, approving the 8 ' - transfer of certain territories described therein between the Cities of I 9 ; Huntington Beach and Westminster. I 10 2 . Attached hereto, Exhibit "B, " , is a certificate of .the Secretary 11 `` of State describing the documents filed with, his office required to 12I complete the above transfer proceedings , and the date of such filing. . 13' 3 . Attached hereto, Exhibit "C, ' are certified copies of the 141 boundary descriptions of the territories transferred. W � Z 15 ` 4 . . Attached hereto, Exhibit "D., '" is a map delineating said wo ° �L U U � , w 16 boundaries. LL Z , 0 2! Q 00 '17 5. All requirements of law pertaining to the above proceedings 18 have been complied with. 19I I declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing 20 � and it is true and correct. 21I Executed this llth_ day of September 197 4, at Santa Ana, 22 California. 23 _..... .. ._._ . W. E. ST -JOi NI = 24 County Clerk and ex-officio 25 _ _ _ _ C.?Pri__ of. _tlie Bca-r-d-u -upervks�A.s� s. of Oran.ge ,=Courity, California 26 27 By _ L Deputy 28 29 j 30 �. 31 32 VTB:ks F 0192-1.2 - RESOLUTION NO. 1607 A RESOLUTION1 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER DEANNEXING CERTAIN LANDS FROM THE WESTMINSTER STREET LIGHT- ING DISTRICT (HUNTINGTON CENTER ANNEXA- TION NO. 1) . WHEREAS , . that certain land described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth at this point , was , by resolution of: the Orange County Board of Supervisors , Number 74-1313 , deannexed from the corporate boundaries of the City of Westminster; and WHEREAS , said land is now within the corporate bound- aries- of the City of Huntington Beach; and WHEREAS , it is no longer appropriate for said land to continue to be part of the Westminster Municipal Lighting District; and WHEREAS , the City Engineer has . recom-Liended. deannexaticn of said land from the Westminster Municipal Lighting District. NOW, THEREFORE , THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST- MINSTER DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : 1. That the land described .in. Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth- at this point .is . hereby deannexed from the Westminster Municipal. Lighting District. 2 . That the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward copies of this resolution . to. .the Office of the s County Tax Assessor and the City Council of the City 1..._r.s Of 'i.u..t.",.g tGn Rcach. I PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of December -1 1974 , by the following vote : AYES : COUNCILMEN: ANTHONY, GILLESPIE, NEUGEBAUER NOES : COUNCILMEN : NONE ABSENT : COUNCILMEN: FRY, JARRETT u Mayor ATTEST: I I City Clerk "a COUNTY OF ORANGE I , KATHARI-NE C. HARPER, certify that I am the duly appointed City Clerk of the City of Westminster; that _`he fore- going resolution was duly adopted at a rerular meeting of the City Council c` the City of Westminster held. on the 2,th day of December 197 4 � Ci t °t Clerk of the. City Westmins ter � Y 0 • I _ EXHIBIT A, SHEET co p 1 1 ' .:..._._..... Dr W 130LSA AVE. <0 1\ N m O {- .. �'SO• MCFADDEN AVEXVE w w Q SCALE 1"= i00' ' o NmZ awo Z Z U u Q � ZEDINGER' 00 Z _ ---- - -- 10 O INDEX MAP i. ?oto � i . _ . }- Z O F}- PROPOSED DEANNEXATION/ } t` t O ZIn { = a 0: � s " O Z H Z ti h W - O 5zsa t< A uj 0QO •: � CJ O�IS�CSC T f . f-Wo - .. - 0 t - CL Z r__P t�-:-•-. :- CITY OF' WESTMINST,ER CITY BOUNDARYPER ANNEXATION N° 18, ORDINANCE N° 11200% 1.0.0.B. N 890 31*06" ',Al 580. 75" ._ .. . S.W.- COR. N.E. 1/4 , -- S.E. 1/4, SEC, 14-5- 11 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY BOUNDA.;, ' PER- NORTH No 3 ANNEXATION, ORDINANCE No f86 v QF--ViSl0IN L::°rD L pi2AVlI� tjY _.. 8. J0NE:S NOV. 197.4 PROPOSED HUNTINGTON CIIECKED BY CENTER DEANNEXAT!JN. ; APPEOVED Bt)II2L(5r—o �—OI" I%l.�i;LIC f�111'14;ES CITY OF • tl I EXIII).',IT "r'1"r SHEET 2 PROPOSED ITUNTING'1C14 CENTER DE-ANNEXATION ' w FROM THE WESTMINSTER MUNICIPAL STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT That portion of the Northeast one-quarter of the Southeast one- quarter of Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Las Bolsas, presently in the City of Westminster, County of Orange, State of California, •as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the- office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: '- Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northeast one-quarter, said corner being an angle point in the present common boundary line of the City of Huntington Beach as described in North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686 of the City of Huntington Beach, certified by the Secretary of State May 9, 1958, and the City of Westminster as described ' in Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120 of the City of Westminster, certified by the Secretary of State October 22, 1959; thence North 0° 16' 26" East 557.05 feet along the West line of said Northeast one- quarter and the before mentioned common Citys boundary line to its intersection with the Southwesterly right of way line of the San 'Diego Freeway Route 405 as shown on a map recorded in Book 3, Page 24 of State Highway .,ap Books in the office of the County Recorder's office of said County; thence leaving the before mentioned Citys common boundary and following along said freeway right or way line South 450 23' 11" East 233.28 feet; thence continuing along said freeway right of way South 45° 59' 03" East 572.91 feet to its intersection - with the South line of said Northeast one-cuarter-also being the cdz=,on boundary line of the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster; thence North 890 31' 06" West 580.75 feet along said South line and Said common boundary line to the point of beginning. r MHU vf CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 714 CODE 893-451 1 December 30 , 1974 ..City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach,. _CA _92.64.8_. ATTENTION: Alicia Wentworth, City Clerk Dear Alicia: We are enclosing a certified copy of Resolution No. 1607 which was adopted by the City Council at an adjourned regular meeting held December 26, 1974 . A copy of this resolution has been sent to the County Assessor, who will eliminate this area from the Westminster Municipal Lighting District. Sincerely yours, CITY OF WESTMINSTER Katharine C. Harper, CMC City Clerk KCH:o Enclosure 1 TO Till," CiTY OP (ITUNSFER 04' Cl'L­%7 That portion of the northeast 0'.1e-quarter of the zouth4ast oiie-qUzZrLcr of Section 14, Tcwnehlp 5 South, Rar;e It West, In. tho Rancho L.az Dolsaz, presently in the city of Westminster, County cf Oran"e, State of as 3110w-a ill mp-1) recorded in book 51, ptige 13 of 11,11acellancous '-laps in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described' es follows; Beginning at the southwest corner of said northeast one-quartcr, Bald corner being an angle point in the present comon boundary Jivo of the city of Huntington Beach as described in North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686 of the city of Huntington Beach, certified by the Secretary of State May 9, 1958, and the city of Westminster as described in Annexation ,,',o. 18, Ordinance No. 1120 of the city of Westminster, certified by the Secretary of State October 22, 1959; thence north 0'16126" east 557.05 feet along the 'west line of said northeast one-quarter and the before mentioned counion Cltys boundary line to its intersection with the south- Westerly right of e.,ay line of the San Die,;o Free-,,�Ly route 405 as shown on a snap recorded in Book 3, page 24 of State highway map books in the office of the County Recorder's office of said County; thence leaving the before mentioned Citys corrnon boundary and following along said freeway right of way line south 45'2311111 cast 233.28 feet; thence continuing along said freeway right of way south 45*59103" east 572.91 feet to its intersection with the south line of said northeast one-quarter also being the common boundary line of the city of Huntington Bench and the efty of Westminster; thence north 89*3110611 west 580.75 felt along said south line and said common boundary line to the Point of Beginning. This &.scrip-,10 C! Map of. Inrcposec, annexation /_5 A I/ ;Xleei the approval of the lr 17173 7-0 rxl,- Cl ry OF HUNT1N070N MACH - ( %TY O VTNINSTERTQANSfER OF TEW,P/TOPY rPVOF E �. � -•tir � r✓�r�S 49, �Tfk•�!T�.Bi•R:' ��. �' ]:.. � Va' �. rs t _ �'�" � yG'��yn "$..-.. ail ,�, e .��,- �l + ,.. {�• .c Ff" �-.i , F j fv . h �Y o f�EfTY!!f R:5$fMt� :4Wl IATf04" f8 QApl..d,'rr A .!?p .SF�'J'TNIYfST`�RNER E!1L f '� .�=�a�&x�3� ai"" �`'.i£�Sit !f.S.fC .Y:� ,-k rr .. �` .' •; .. - _ � , s,.....vs�.'s^i•c�_.a*v.�i*,..T�.:..'3 t..,„. ��..srr.-,+�;t ,..._ .-�..aw'_�`i: STATE OF CALIFORNIA tTATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION GEORGE R. REILLY First District,San Francisco 1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA JOHN W. LYNCH (P.O. BOX 1799, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95808) Second District, Fresno WILLIAM M. BENNETT Third District, San Rafael RICHARD NEVINS Fourth District, Pasadena HOUSTON I. FLOURNOY Controller, Sacramento W. W. DUNLOP .9r. wo :P. St John Executive Secretory Orange County Clerk 515 N. >� ore St. Nov.- 4 19�4. Santa Ana, California 92702 Your letter of Got 1l Attn: Lelda P rral Deputy Bear Mr. St Jahn This is to acknowledge receipt of the indicated statement(s), required by Section 54900, at seq. , of the Government Code by which Resolution No. '74-1313 transferred certain territory from City o Huntington Bench to City of Westminster and transferred territory from City of Westminster to City of Huntington Beach, September 11, x Legal description(s) of boundaries x -Map(s) showing boundaries X Resolution(s) No. 4-1313 Ordinances) No. Certificate(s) Other The 19?5 iBoard roll will reflect the action evidenced by the above statement(s) unless one or more of the statements are found to be inadequate. If a statement is found to be inadequate or its validity for assessment or taxation purposes is questioned, we will bring such a situation to your attention. In some cases, it may be necessary that a certificate of completion be filed with the Secre- tary of State to complete the proceedings. Very truly yours, T- eo NEILQN M. JENNINGS, Chief cc Mr. Jack P. Vallerga VALUATION DIVISION Orange sty Assessor cc-Huntington Beach City Clark cc-Weatminater City Clerks PROPOSED HUNTINGTON CENTER ANNENaTION NO. 1 ST )OW-1 00IM-111Y TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH That portion of the northeast one-quarter of the southeast one-quarter of Section 14 , Township 5 South , Range 11 West, in the Rancho Las Bolsas , presently in the City of Westminster, County of Orange ,, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51 , page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County , described as follows : Beginning at the southwest corner of said northeast one-quarter, said corner being at an angle point in the present common boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach as described in North No. 3 Annexation , ordinance No. 686 of the city of Huntington Beach , certified by the Secretary of State May 9 , 1958 , and the city of Westminster as described in Annexation No. 18 , Ordinance No. 1120 of the city of Westminster, certified by the - Secretary of State October 22 , 1959 ; thence north 0116 '26 " east 557.05. feet . along the west line of said northeast one-quarter and the before mentioned common Citys boundary line to its intersection with the southwesterly right of way line of the- San Diego Freeway Route 405 as shown on a map recorded in Book 3 , page 24 of State Highway map books in the office of the County Recorder 's office of said County; thence leaving the before mentioned Citys common boundary and following along said freeway right of way line south 45'23 '11" east 223.28 feet; thence continuing along said freeway right of way south 45'59 ' 03" east 572 .91 feet to its intersection with the south line of said northeast one-quarter also being the Common boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach and the 0,ity of Westminster; thence north 89131 ' 06" west 580 . 78 feet along said south line and said common boundary line to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT "A" Page B29 1 FIG 1888 'Iffils description amd mcp of proposed .. _. csnncxafiion _ �_?a,-_,,�• rnceP the. . ' approval 0" ilie Stirveyor's 01'11Le PROPOSED II11TL--*.-7,G1,2O7,TA k!TTEX?+TTON NO 54 TO T I i P CITY 0 F iEf,;.:iINSi' :It (TRANSFER OF `ERRI` ,RY .'''RCI�) C?`1'L 0 :[1`?i''r:zm1cv1 r"FnA is That portiori of the rior thi�ast' or:e�--quar.ter of the southeast one- quarter. of Section 24 , Township 5 South, flange 11 'It Fest, and that portior. of the northwest one-quarter of the south-viost one--:jvarter of Secttion . 19, .'.township 5 South, I'3nge 10 ,•pest, all in the -Rancho Las Dolsas, presently in the City of Huntington I3c�ach, County, of Orange, State of California, as shotni on a map recorded in Book 51, Page 13 of M,i.scellarcous M- ps in the office of the County Recordcr of :said County, desc._i:: cI as follows : Beginning at the i rte.r ect _on of the easterly extension of a line parallel with and 20. 00 feet outherly, measured at rich t angles from the north Line of said northeast crie--quarter with a line parallel with anal .30. 00 feet ea:;terly, measures at right angles from the east line of said northeast oi:c-quarter, said- point or intersection being an angle point in the present- .City boundary line of the: City of Hunt-ington Deach as described in 'Northeast 'No. 1 7i_nnexation" Ordinance No. 638 of the City of 1,11 ntingtori Beach, also being an angle point -in the present: Cs.ty. bou.•'ndla y. line of t::e City of West_1i ister as described in "Annexation No. 31" Ordinance 210. 1171 of the City of Westminster and also a -point on the present City boundary line of the City of Fo-witain Valley as described in "Ircorporaticn" of the City of Fountain .Valley; thence south 0° 19' 46" west 1126. 86 feet along the before mentioned parallel line, also being the present common boundary line of the City of M ntington Beach and the City of Fountain Valley to its intersection with the centerline of the San Diego Freeway Route 405_ as shorn on map filed in Book 4 , Page 49 of State Highway Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence leaving the last mantioned common City boundary lines and following along said freeway centerline north 44° 01 ' 46" ,rest 1277. 64. feet to a curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 12, 000. 00 feet; thence northi-;esterly along said curve • and freeway centerline thru a central angle of 11 27 ' 54' an are d.icten-ice of 306. 84 feet to a non-tangent lire parallel with and 20. 00 feet -southerly, Treasured at right angles, from the north line of said north- east one-quarter, said line also being the present: - cor-,rnon City boundary li;;e of the .City of Eu:iti ngt:on 3^ach and the City of Postminster as EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 . h; �662 ' E3� 1 29 { P61889 PROPOSED HEIL-MAGNOLTA P+IMl ..'ATIO2I NO. 54 'VO TIIF CITY OF (TW,.NSFER OF TETZRI7'O1)Y, FROM CITY OF IiIRN"I'II:OTON '3EF..CIIj describ: d in the before )rontioncd respective ordinances, thence South 89, 30, 10" eant 1110. 56 alo'lig said naraliel line end its easterly extension, to the Point of I1sginning. -PROPOSEt) BK 1129 1 PG 1890 . AItNUAT 101) t10. 1 TO Ti{E CATV OF lil( 'I'1i!i,TOc, 1'c:1;:15 ( TRANSFER Ol' TMRITO:t't PRO?a Cl"t." C'r That portion of the northeast- one-quarter of th-e soutilcast one-quar.Ler of Section 14, TGwnehip 5 South, Range 11. hest, in trio. Rancho Loa BoIsas, presently in the city of lleatminster, County of Orange, Stztte of California, as shown on a map recorded in look 51, pi:ge 13 of Atincellaneous ,taps in the office of the County Recorder of said Count),, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said northeast one-quarter, maid corner 1 being an angle point in the present common boundary lino of the city of Huntington Beach as described in .North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No, 686 of the city of flunti-ngton Beach, certified by the Secretary of State May 9, 1958, and the city of Westminster an described in Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120 of the city of Westminster, certified by the Secretary of State October 22, 1959; thence north 0*16126" east 557.05 feet along the -vest line of said northeast one-quarter and the before mentioned connaon Citys boundary lire to its intersection with the south- westerly right of way line of the San Diego rreew,ay Route 405 as shown on a rnap recorded in Book 3, page 24 of State HightTay map books in the office of the County 'Recorder's office of said County; thence leaving the before mentioned Cityo cornnon boundary and following along said freeway right of way line south 45°23111" east 233.28 feet; thence continuing along said freeway right of way south 45°59'03" east 572.91 feet to its intersection with the south line of said northeast one-quarter also being the common boundary line of the city of Huntington Bench and the city of Westminster; thence north 89°31106" wrest 580.75 fe&,t along said south line and said common boundary line to the Point of Beginning. This clescrip;ion d map cf proposec annexation meet the . approval of thF �u,vevor's• ;;fice EXHIBIT "B" i i PROPOSED TJEIL-IIAGTTOLIA ANNEXATION NO. 54 TO THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER That portion of the northeast one-quarter of the southeast one-quarter of Section 24 , Township 5 South, Range 11 West, and that portion of the northwest one-quarter of the southwest one- i� quarter of Section 19 , Township 5 South, Range 10 West, all in the i Rancho Los Bolsas , presently in the city- of Huntington Beach, County of Orange , State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51 , Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the . County Recorder of said County , described as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the easterly extension of a line parallel with and 20 :00 'feet southerly, measured at right angles from the north line of said northeast one-quarter with a line parallel with and 30 . 00 feet easterly, measured at right angles from the east line of said northeast one-quarter, .said point of intersection being an angle point in the present City boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach as described" in "Northeast No. 1 Annexation" Ordinance No. 588 .of the city of Huntington Beach, also being an angle point in the present City boundary lire of the city of Westminster as described in "Annexation No. 31" Ordinance No. 1171 of the city of Westminster and also a point on the present City boundary line of the city of Fountain Valley as described in "Annexation 1" Resolution No. 1005 of the city of Fountain Valley; thence south 0°19 ' 46"west 1126 . 85 feet along the before mentioned parallel line , .also being the present common boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach and the city of Fountain Valley to its intersection with the centerline of the San Diego -Freeway Route 405 as shown on a map recorded in Book 4, Page 49 of State Highway Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence leaving the last mentioned common .City boundary lines and following along said freeway centerline north 44°01 ' 46" west 1277.64 feet to a curve concave to 'the southwest having a radius of 12 ,000 . 00 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve and freeway EXHIBIT 1fB" Page 1 centerline' thru a central. angle of 1127 ' 54" an arch distance Of 306 . 84 .feet to a non-tangent line parallel with and 20 . 00 feet southerly , measured at right angles , from the north line of said northeast one-quarter, said line also being the present common City boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach and the city of Westminster as described in the before mentioned respective ordinances , thence south 89130 ' 10" east 1110 . 56 feet along said parallel line and its easterly extension, to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT "B" Paae 2 i- a �' �.liL�C /'��..G! ZE�itd•Gw-v7v/_" !I I ORIGINAL COPY 1 1 RESOLUTION OF THE BOA :D OF SUPERVISORS 2 Paf 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, .CALIFOR14.IA September 11, 1974 4 5 On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconde.la and carried, the i 6 following Resolution was adopted: 7 WHEREAS , pursuant to Resolution No. 74-968 of this Board, and ! 8 after due notice, as provided by law, a hearing before this Board was 9 held this date , involving the proposed .transfer_ of territory, a legal I! 10 description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A, " from th. j' 11 City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster; and the proposed transfer of territory, al legal a r_ • f. I 1� y, eg 1. description o which is attached hereto 13 marked Exhibit "B, " from the City of Westminster to the City of i4 Huntington Beach; and " ' WHEREAS an protests to said transfers were heard and passed Z 1S Y p p_. -) 0 16 I upon, and , Z < � � 17 -WHEREAS, a majority protest has not been made, u !I 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the above transfers �I 19 of territory are hereby approved, without election. I, 20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board is directed j i 21 to enter upon the minutes of this Board, certify and transmit to the 22 Secretary of State and to the legislative bodies of the affected cities , I 23 copies' of this Resolution.. 24 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board is directed 25 to record with the Orange County Recorder_ an affidavit of completion 26 pursuant to Governnient Code §34080 . 27 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk is directed to make the 28 necessary filings with the State Board of Equalization pursuant to 291 Government—Code §54900 . 30 31 ( // I • 32 'TB:ks Resolution No. 74-131_3 Transfers of Territory; Cities Huntington Beach &. Westminster l II. . lII I AYES : SUPERVISORS DAVID L. BAKER, RALPH A. DIEDRICH, R. W. BATTIN AND RALPH B. CLARK 2 NOES : SUPERVISORS NONE 3 ABSENT : SUPERVISORS NONE 4 5 I STATE OF CA.LIFOR141A ) ss. 6 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 7 I, WILLIAM E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the 8 Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California , hereby certify that 9 the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the to said Board at a regular meeting thereof held on the llth day of . 1] Septerabe.r , 19 74 , and passed by a unanimous vote of said 12 Board . 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 14 llth day of September , 1974 J 15 WILLIAM E. ST JOHN � 00 County Clerk and ex 'officio Clerk 4 ; U I6 of the Board of Supervisors of LL Z Orange Cou- ty" _ California 054 o 0 17 U - 18 B 01 - - Deputy 19 e. - �. 20 21 J 22 23 24 25 26 - - 27 28 29 30 31 32 F 0192-24 "" 2. CRS r a 1 •1+^� wvn is 0 A L D ! S T p I C MAP 2, - I Intl: • Y -OF gp��r.e�T at:Ka.9CD 06 artka0r )tL re•ee �a♦.•a..,e•¢ a+s ' • � . f�PV CC++e 6Cll (1k 0+nsxCB �d af7 •e�'•'-•, •e. «.. w .e..ee I CGLh+JY D•xo•af or•+ I-.c-er leer ♦ s••= n+Y•ryf a«/ e.7.¢0 1•af (_. .,,., 1 Fi•8•e/ 070 )•x•W 19}i rm woo ea•ca♦ aectW on•'s¢• r. v { � `+ a^o•al err w•d•ei ))i0 � y� _ t � j 1�l f/� Jf/ � t, � f•n•ai oc4 f r tsm+,..ry w•e..l r oI '1 ' d1. � � �� 11 V ��� .•L..C'+t�i �.��.a..oi 6w:ta o•i•a.) Oso .1 7 �y jy q �r / T� , r� ,j •q •q-�j� y y 7•f e•a o w) . {",�.�.•�. cu•.•.a w e�••a RA1CGE 'COUNTY,�1y CALab OR1G�dIt 6-�-ae eos4 8tilaceroc.•we.w•.a�a«so•o.f D•a•o4 et,�• o 4SlEt'clrlrC 9Y ZONE CASE: 63•i•aG fled 44.t,•.), t-).2n.til.1X%t)r,}te,elf,4)),a ro,473.U$,de•tf{ m a'8.6) /•)2 Cx�•a4•G)¢ee•)2,00 )1H°lf1Pb,/6.2Q lb.a." Ifr7 Qg�V1dt ♦QCdRO B♦A•a• WC0 m • .w. c.c.s♦w4 ryMU R•��qq// ,J� � �''+.v �q ���t:19 4es Y .•al.•4•bm1M Cz Iw t, C2 'r,°j ry A. R5 a c1 • t � 3 �� -0lP 4 - , ids• a Z i ;f R a 910AR AY[ Pfn C � 3 �IPi + RI Rl RI t F'1 iti RI RI Rt i IRI Ini Rf V fil '� R1 1 L[ r Ri RI 1t i r, + RI .•c• <• RI �� t 1 - Ri C 4 fo Ri RI '� �A .t<• ' ii 1 R� ;ti it ' w•RI Ji7 CMG C4 RI RI i' I., S.I1?I �i?Rt + 1 R! ! � c II RI RI •mac. f. RI i V tamer.: :+ ' c• �^-- ` ' A' Q RI i Al � •c+ t ' _ _1 i � 1 Rl 1;•� �C<-} c <. RI x IC4ij i. Gr7E j;3_� RI Y� RI t _ .J r:a ns ro t.�w 1 bi �rR� •.1,�V� --)..� n7 L— `;� I C 2 1 f i , , 1 AGENDA '� � G�'�►��ate''' ` Julv At CONSENT CALENDAR MATTERS: (continued) 23. PROPOSED CONSENT TO TRANSFER PROPERTIES - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY OF WESTMINSTER. The City of Huntington Beach and the . City of Westminster propose to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous cit;y. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Set for hearing. 24. REQUEST TO COMPROMISE MEDICAL CENTER LIEN (Dist. 1) This is a request to -accept a compromise of an Orange County Medical Center lien. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve compromise o€'. a- $1 '682.26 Medical Center lien .in the amount of $1,121.51, pursuant to the authority granted in California Govern- ment Code Section 23004.2. REQUEST LEGAL ACTION - ZONING CODE VIOLATIONS - SIGNS - CARTER OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY (Dist. 5) . Said company is maintaining three unlawful signs along the Coast Highway 'in the Community of Dana Point, after having more than ample time to remove them. The signs are required to be removed by the. sign abatement regulation of the Zoning Code. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize County Counsel to commence legal action to abate the three signs involved. (Consent Calendar Matters continued) �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK 60 A4 I 1 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF 2 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 3 July 2, 1974 4 On motion of Supervisor -Diedrich, duly seconded and carried, 5 the following Resolution was adopted: 6 WHEREAS, there has been presented to this Board a resolul;ion of 7 the City of Huntington Beach requesting that the territory within that 8 city, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A`1, 9 be transferred to the City of Westminster; and 10 WHEREAS, there has been presented to this Board a resolution of 11 the City of Westminster requesting that certain territory within that 12 city, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "B", 13 be transferred to the City of Huntington Beach; and 14 WHEREAS, both of the above cities have consented to the' above J W LLZZ 15 transfers of territory; and W O 11 ; w Z 16 WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission has approved L, � Z 00 17 said transfers; 18 NOW, THEREFORE,' BE IT RESOLVED as follows: 19 That a hearing on the above transfers will be held in the 20 Chambers of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange, in the 21 County Administration Building, 515 .North Sycamore Street, Santa Ana, 22. California, on the llth day of September , 19749 at the hour of .23 9: 45 0 clock A M. 24 That any interested person desiring to make written protest 25 against said transfers shall do so by written communication filed with 26 the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors not later than the hour of q.45 27 o'clock A .M. , on the llth day of September 1974, and said 28 written protest by a landowner shall contain a description sufficient to 29 identify the land owned by him on the last equalized assessment roll. 30 That the Clerk of this Board be and is hereby directed to pub- 31 fish a notice of said hearing once in the Register , s 32 a newspaper of general circulation in each of the above cities, said ? 'VTB:cj Resolution No. 74-968 Proposed Consent to Transfer Properties F0192-1.2 City of Huntington Beach rity of WpAtminster 1. I publication to be commenced at least forty (40) but not more than sixty 2 (60) days prior to the date set for hearing. 3 That the Clerk of this Board be and is hereby directed to give 4 mailed notice' of said hearing by mailing such notice to the legislative 5 body of each of the above cities at least thirty (30) days prior to the 6 date set for hearing. 9 ` 10 I 12 13 14 J � W r oZ � 15 � o W ° u U° LL 16 r u U. Z O = a OD 18 19 20 AYES : SUPERVISORS RALPH A. DIEDRICH, RALPH B. CLARK, R. W. . BATTIN, AND DAVID L. BAKER 21 NOES : SUPERVISORS NONE 22 ABSENT: SUPERVISORS RONALD W. CASPERS 23 24 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. 25 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 26 I, WILLIAM E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex®officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, hereby certify that 27 the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the said Board at a regular meeting, thereof held on the 2nd day of 28 Jul , 19_Z4 , and passed by a unanamc�u� . votes of sald goar-dmembers present. 29 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set �myr',•`hand and se�Li .this 30 2nd day of Jul., , 19—ZA—• 31 WILY E. ST JOHN., County Clerk-ra-nd 'ex-officio` Clerk 32 of the Board-• ®f Supervisors ;-of . Orange Coui�'t California -0192-32 �Rs BY puty 2. I NOTICE OF HEARING 2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange, State of California, has by Resolution No. 74-968, dated 3 July 2, 1974, declared that a hearing on the proposed transfer of terri- tories between the cities of Westminster and Huntington Beach, and all 4 objections thereto, will be held by said Board in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange, in the County Administration 5 Building, 515 North Sycamore Street, Santa Ana, California on the llth day of September , 1974, at the hour of 9: 45 o'clock 6 A .M. , at which time and p ace all interested persons may appear and be Fe-ard. 7 NOTICE IS _URTHER GIVEN that any interes erson desiring to 8 make aten otest" ainst said transfers shall do, by written comma cation` iYed with the Clerk of the Board o Super sots not later 9 than the hour o '` : 4 o°clock A .M. , on thl 11th day of iSe tember and that saa written pr test a landowner 10 shall contain a ption sufficient to identi t land owned by him on the last eqttqlized assessment roll. 11 A legal description of said territories is contained in 12 Resolution No. 74-968 , dated July 2, 1974, of the Board of Supervisors, on file with the Clerk of said Board of Supervisors. The territories are 13 generally described as follows: 14 1. Transfer from Huntington Beach to Westminster: 15 "4.4 acres located Southwesterly of .the corner of 10 Magnolia Street and Heil Avenue in the City of - W 16 Huntington Beach." ; Z 17 2. Transfer from Westminster to Huntington Beach: 18 "3.7 acres located Southwesterly of the San Diego Freeway adjacent to the North side of the Huntington 19 Beach Shopping Center in the City of Westminster." 20 21 DATED this 2nd day of July , 1974. 22 BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 23 W. E. ST JOHN 24 County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of 25 (SEAL) Orange County, California 26- c-C By 27 eputy 28 29 30 I 31 32 i i 0192-1.2 66 Sal in accordance with the "Procedures for Fni-i onm.entsal lu-oac- RevZt ,,i" as adopter by the Oran.se Col my local Agency - o-c at.ion. Co mission on �'Iarch 27, 1974, the Executive Officer is required to send, notice to each person on the Co=ission' s spacial notice list notifying such persons that a Negative Declaration or an Environrental l:pact Repo`-� has been prepared on a specific proposal to be heard_ by the local Agency Fo=ation Co�=i ssion. Persons desiring to be placed oa the Comiiissior_' s special notice list should contact the I�,,FGO office at 83',2239. ,'?ot-i ce sha11 consist of a summary of proposals r f_o_ which 1Tc-a'+��� �.�i-ve Declarations or F'nviro=er_tai Impact Reports _have been prepared. taw i-t.ten coy_. --nts relate ve to noticed. proposals- should be sent to : Local Aoency Formation Colmmissl.on, P.O. Bo' � 687, Sung Ana, Ca. * 92102 no later than June _7,- 1974 Proposals- listed bnlot,, �>Jill be heard b; the Lo- cam Aceney Fo F anon Cow?ss�_on on June -12 , 1974 at 2 :00 P.M. ;n Room 503 of the ge T rAdministration, { - _ Oxac,, �oz t� `„ Y ���� C 5115 N. Syc,2mko Ye Street, Santa Ara, t'..1, , esxcepG as, noi l `` t:..i—;V;1_L_ ; - ' 1 . PROPOSED A1NI EXATION TO THE GARDEN GROVE SANITARY DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. K-396-74 Approximately 0.85 acre located on the east side of Loara Steeet south of Orangewood Avenue, in the south Anaheim area; request is to annex territory to the district for the purpose of convecting a single-family residence from a septic tank system to a sanitary sewer system. A negative declaration was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on May 22 , 1974. 2 . PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE GARDEN GROVE SANITARY DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. K-397-74 Approximately 0.54 acre located on the west side of Loara Street south of Orangewood Avenue, in the south Anaheim area; request is to annex territory to the district for the purpose of converting a. single-family residence :from a septic tank system to a sanitary ` sewer system. A negative declaration was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on May 22 , 1974. 3. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO TIME GARDEN GROVE SANITARY DISTRICT f1N�Tr .TION iVO.. K-398-74 y ApproXimately 0 .30 acre located on the east side of El Rey Place north of Garden Grove Boulevard, in the east Garden Grove area; request is to annex territory to the district for the purpose of converting a single-family residence from a septic tank system to a sanitary sewer system. A negative declaration was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on May 22 , 1974. t LAF CO ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION Meeting of June 12 , 1974 4. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CARDEN GROVE .SANITARY DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. K-401-74 Approximately 0. 32 acre located on the north side of Lilac Avenue east of Gates Street , in the southwest Santa Ana area; request is to annex territory to the district for the purpose of converting a single-family residence from a septic tank system to a ,sanitary sewer system. A negative declaration was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on May 22 , 1-974. 5 . PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY REORGANIZATION NO. 26 Approximately 5 acres located on the west side of the Street of the Green Lantern and on the north side of Dana. Point Cove Road, east of Scenic Drive, in Dana Point; request is to transfer territory from South Coast County Water District to Capistrano Beach County Water District and Tri-Cities Municipal Water District. A negative declara- tion was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on May 22 , 1974. 6 . PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY REO RGANIZAT ION NO. 28 Approximately 2 .6 acres located on the east side of Rose Drive south of Imperial Highway, in the northeast Placentia area; request is to transfer territory from Yorba Linda Library District to Placentia Library District. A negative declaration was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County on May 22, 1974. 7. PROPOSED CONSENT TO TRANSFER PROPERTIES - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER 14.30 acres located on the south side of Heil Avenue, west of Magnolia Street, northeast of the San Diego Freeway, in the north Huntington Beach area to be transferred from the City of Huntington Beach to Westminster (Heil-Magnolia' iZo. 54 Annexation" . 3.697 acres located on the south side of the San Diego Freeway, east of Beach Boulevard, at the northeast corner of the Huntington Shopping Center, in the north Huntington Beach area., to be transferred from the City of Westminster to Huntington Beach (Huntington Center Annexa- tion No. 1) A negative declaration was filed with the County Clerk of Orange County regarding this transfer of property proposal on May 22 , 1974. ,y I i RESOLUTIO! A.-4 OF THE BOA!,,,D OF SU"'PERVISORS OF � 2 ORANGE COU'rilly, CALIFORNIA 3 July 2, 1974 4 On motion of Supervisor Diedrich, duly seconded and carried, 5 the follai#ing Resolution was adopted: 6 �THEREAS, there has been presented t.-o this Board a resolut.-ion c 7 the City of Huntington Beach requesting that the territory within that 8 city, a legal description of �--jhich is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" 9 be transferred to the City of Wesn-tinster; and 10 WHEREAS, there has been presented to this Board a resolution c 11 the City of Westminster requesting that certain territory within that 12 city, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "B" 13 be transferred to the -City of Huntington Beach; and 14 WHEREAS, both of the above cities have consented to the above _J , 0 15 transfers of territory; and z D " W 0 , I � ; W 16 WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission has approved L Z 0 D 00 17 said transfers; 0 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: 19 That a hearing on the above transfers will be held in the 20 Chambers of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange, in the 21 County Administration Building, 515 .North Sycamore Street, Santa Ana, 22 California, on the 11th day of September 1974, at the hour of 23 9: 45 01clock A M. 24 That any interested person desiring to make written protest 25. 1 against inst said transfers shall do so by written communication filed with 26 the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors not later than the hour of _2L45 27 O' clock A .M. . on the 11th day of _ September 1974, and said 28 written protestby a landowner shall contain a description sufficient to 29 identify the land owned by him on the last equalized assessment roll. 30 That the Clerk of this Board be and is hereby directed to pub- 31 1 lish a notice of said hearing once in the Register 32 a newspaper of general circulation in each of the above cities, said VTB:cj Resolution No. 74-968 Proposed Consent to Transfer Properties F 0 192-1.2 City of Huntington Beach City of Westminster I publication to be commenced at least forty (40) but not more than sixty 2 (60) days prior to the date set for hearing. 3 That the Clerk of this Board be and is hereby directed to give 4 mailed notice of said hearing by mailing such notice to the legislative 5 body of each of the above cities at least thirty (30) days prior to the 6 date set for hearing. 8 9 10 II 12 13 1.1 J � ozz 15 � waa U u , 4 , w 16 0r u �Z i O 0 1 i u lfi 19 20. AYES : SUPERVISORS RALPH A. DIEDRICH, RALPH B. CLARK, R. W. BATTIN, AND DAVID L. BAKER 21 NOES : SUPERVISORS NONE 22 ABSENT: SUPERVISORS RONALD W. CASPERS 23 24 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. 25 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 26 I, WILLIAM E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, hereby certify that 27 the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the said Board at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of 28 auly , 19 [ _, and passed by a uang�s� vote of saidBoard members present. 29 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set 'my,.,hand and seal`'this 30 2nd day of July 31 WILLIm"E. ST JOHN County Clerk"-4-nd ex-officio Clerk 32 of the Board-- of Supervisors :of Orange Coun'o-, California ., Deputy t , `,_,�6�C�,��C.���.`�.� 1`�.� ✓,� `'/G%mil'C.'�'�C7��r�' .�1�i'�'%�'`'�.�t''r'-�i i�.:�'V �r '..�� x-- . To TEE CIT, of WZ-37-Vll �, 17Z. K t r'�,4/t/sFE,Q OF TEl1l'/TG?!��F'4o.H cir�oF.s✓U/✓ri c%r0Al BE,:t .✓orzr�E.�srcor��✓E.rl.c%r< I ,, \ ciry of�Es N 3soQo/NAit/c� �J One \ .4'NNE.PArilot/ h'E/L A�E/t✓UE i4�' \ cir of ��✓ri.✓cro�✓aE.xrcf/ �r aoarc%�,Q �,e ti \ Now�Asrr✓�/A�✓NE,rAr�onfo�/�✓,4�✓cE�eee � �.° / I .Z e•/•PJ OD U \ \ Y �•.sae es vzx sq,car«s �o l%solz5e h G E Jt✓.O �-a� �� 0009E,0 r4ri/NE.I'Ar/ONBOUrt�0.4f� �� \ �o� ��`,�� 4 yT d O ORANGE COUNTY -^� /—� ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ® (D U N—rY V P P. O. BOX 687 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 /� TELEPHONE: 834-2239 RAN G P_ AREA CODE 714 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION June 24, 1974 CHAIRMAN RALPH A. DIEDRICH Clerk of the Board of Supervisors SUPERVISOR TNIRD DISTRICT County Administration Building Santa Ana, California VICE-CHAIRMAN STAN NORTHRUP In Re: Environmental Consideration by LAFC on the matter REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC of the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster proposing to transfer territory from ROBERT W. BATTIN one city to a contiguous city, in compliance with SUPERVISOR the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 FIRST DISTRICT Dear Mrs . Alexander: DONALD A. McINNIS COUNCILMAN CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH On April 2, 1974, acting on knowledge of the recent Appellate Court decision of Bozung versus Ventura County Local Agency DONALD J. SALTARELLI Formation Commission, the Board of Supervisors referred the COUNCILMAN matter of the proposed transfers of properties between the CITY OF TUSTIN cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster to the Local IAgency Formation Commission for consideration in compliance ALTERNATE with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. DAVID L. BAKER SUPERVISOR SECOND DISTRICT On October 31, 1973, the Local Agency Formation Commission Iapproved Magnolia-Heil Annexation No. 54 to the City of ALTERNATE Westminster and Huntington Center Annexation No. 1 to the REE BURNAP City of Huntington Beach. REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC These annexations represent transfers of territory between ALTERNATE the cities of Westminster and Huntington Beach. The portion ALICE FRANKIEWICH proposed for annexation to the City of Westminster consists COUNCILWOMAN CITY OF CYPRESS of 4.4 acres located on the south side of Heil Avenue and on the west side of Magnolia Street, in the east Huntington Beach area, while the portion proposed for annexation to the RICHARD T. TURNER EXECUTIVE OFFICER City of Huntington Beach consists of 3.7 acres located south- westerly of the San Diego Freeway immediately north of the Huntington Center. The reason stated for the transfer of properties is that . due to the location of the San Diego Page 2 In Re: Environmental Consideration by LAFC on the matter of the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster proposing to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 • Freeway in this area, the cities state they can provide more economical services to the properties upon completion of transfer. The cities of Westminster and Huntington Beach are proposing to transfer such properties pursuant to Government Code Sec- tion 35270 et. seq. Section 35271 states : Proceedings to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city are initiated by filing with the board of supervisors of the county in which the cities are situated either by: a. A petition signed by not less than 25 percent of the registered electors residing in the territory to be transferred if the territory is inhabited, or b. A petition signed by owners of not less than one- fourth of the land in the territory by area, and by assessed value as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the county in which the terri- tory is situated if the territory is uninhabited; or c. A resolution of the legislative body of the city in which the territory is situated. There shall be filed with the petition a resolution of consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative body of the city in which the territory is situated. In every case there shall be filed with the petition or resolution a resolution of consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative body of the city to which it is proposed to transfer the territory. The petition of resolution shall contain a description of the Page 3 In Re: Environmental Consideration by LAFC on the matter of the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster proposing to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 territory proposed to be transferred, the name of the city in which the territory is presently included and the name of the city to which it is proposed that the territory will be annexed. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS The LAFC staff contacted the affected cities regarding any proposed development on the properties to be transferred, to ascertain if there would be an environmental impact. The affected cities state that there are no "underlying projects involved in the transfer of territory between the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster at this time. The property proposed for transfer to Westminster consists of 80 existing apartment units located between Heil Avenue and the northbound on-ramp of the San Diego Freeway at Magnolia Street. Future development in the area will be limited to a vacant one-acre parcel zoned for commercial use. The property proposed for transfer to Huntington Beach is vacant property and zoned in the City of Westminster for commercial use. The City of Huntington Beach states that upon transfer of the property to Huntington Beach, there will probably be immediate pressure for commercial development. The Executive Officer has reviewed the Request for Negative Declaration Status submitted by the two cities on the annexations involved in this transfer of territory and determined the proposals will not have a significant effect on the environment. Subsequently, the Executive Officer filed a negative declaration with the County Clerk relative to the transfer of territory on May 21, 1974. Page 4 In Re: Environmental Consideration by LAFC on the matter of the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster proposing to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 COMMISSION ACTION At the Local Agency Formation Commission meeting of June 12, 1974, the Commission adopted the negative declaration on the transfer of territory between the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster and directed the Executive Officer to trans- mit their action to the Board of Supervisors . RECOMMENDATION Attach the Local Agency Formation Commission's adopted reso- lution of a negative declaration to the pending request by the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city. Respectfully submitted, t4a-jV �dzv� Richard T. Turner Executive Officer RTT/ff CC: County Administrative Office Adrian Kuyper City of Huntington Beach City of Westminster rf ORANGE- COUNTY p _ ADMINISTRATION LUILDING 6Fpty .z y"' P. O. BOX 687 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 CCC `v. TELEPHONE: 834--2234 C) f 4 + AREA CODE: 714 LOCAL AGENCY FORMA"LION COMMISSION .dune 3, 1974 Local Agency Formation Commission CHAIRMAN County Administration Building RALPH A. DIEDRICH Santa Anti., California SUPERVISOR THIRD DISTRICT In Re: Transfer of territory between the cities of Westminster and Huntington Beach �(Environmenta?. - VICE-CHAIRMAN considerations relative to the proposed transfer STAN NORTHRUP of properties) REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC Gentlemen : ROBI W. BATTIN On October 31, 1973, the Local Agency Formation CommissionSUPERVISOR �5,� y7 T / '7'(��,, FIRST DISTRICT approved Magnolia-Heil Annexation No. 54 to the City of Westminster and Huntington Center Annexation No. 1 to the City of Huntington Beach. DONA— A. MCINNIS COUNCILMAN �+ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH These annexations represent transfers of territory between the cities of Westminster and Huntington Beach. The por- tion proposed for annexation to the City of Westminsteb DONALD I SALTARELLI consists of 4.4 acres located on the south side of Hell COUNCILMAN CITY OF TUSTIN Avenue and on the west side of Magnolia Street , in the east Huntington Beach area, while the portion proposed for annexation to the City of Huntington Beach consists DA ID ALTERNATE of 3. 7 acres located southwesterly of the San Diego Freeway L.SUPERVISOR immediately north of _the Huntington Center. The reason SECOND DISTRICT stated for the transfer of properties is that due to the location of the San Diego Freeway in this area, the cities state they can provide more economical services to the ALTERNATE REE BURNAP properties upon completion of transfer. REPRESENTATIVE OF ('p GENERAL PUBLIC The Cities of Westminster and Huntington Beach are pro- posing to transfer such properties pursuant to Government ALTERNATE Code Section 35270 et. seq. Section 35271 states : ALICE FRANKIEWICH COUNCILWOMAN Proceedings to transfer territory from one city to a CITY OF CYPRESS contiguous city are initiated by filing with the board of supervisors of the county in which the cities are RICHARD T. TURNER situated either by: - EXECUTIVE OFFICER a. A petition signed by not less than 25 percent of the registered electors residing in the 4 Page 2 In Re : Transfer of territory between the cities of Westminster and Huntington Beach (Environmental considerations relative to the .proposed transfer of properties) territory to be transferred if the territory is inhabited, or b. A petition signed by owners of not less than one-fourth of the land in the territory, by area , and by assessed value as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the county in which the territory is situated if the territory is uninhabited; or c. A resolution of the legislative body of the c-11Cy in which the territory is situated. There shall be filed with the petition a resolution of consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative body of the city in whichthe territory is situated. In every case there shall be filed with the petition or resolution a resolution of consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative body of the city to which it is proposed to transfer the territory. The petition of resolution shall contain a description of the terri- tory proposed to be transferred, the name of the city in which the territory is presently included and the name of the city to which it is proposed that the territory will be annexed. On April 2 , 1974, the Orange Count Board of Supervisors referred the transfer proposal baY to the Local Agency Formation Commission for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. This action was ne- cessitated by the Court of Appeal decision (Bozung vs Ventura County LAFCO) which designated LAFCO a "public agency" within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. ENVIRONN11ENTAL CONSIDERATIONS There are no "underlying projects" involved in the transfer of territory between the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster at this time. The property proposed is Page 3 In Re : Transfer of territory between the cities of Westmtnster and Huntington Beach (Environmental considerations relative to the proposed transfer of properties) for transfer to T-lestminster consists of 80 existing apartment units and the northbound on-ramp of the San Diego Freeway at Magnolia Street. Future development in the area will be limited to a vacant one acre parcel zoned for commercial use. The property proposed for transfer to Huntington Beach is va.cant property and zoned in the City of Westminster for commercial use. Th6 City of Huntington Beach states t1l.at upon transfer of the property to Huntington Beach, there will probably be immediate pressure for commercial development. The Executive Officer has reviewed the two proposed annexations involved in this transfer of territory and has determined that the subject annexations will not have a significant effect on the environment'. Subsequently, the Executive Officer filed a negative declaration with the County Clerk relative to the annexation proposals on May 21, 1974. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the negative declarations relative to the Huntington Center Annexation No. 1 to the City of Huntington Beach and the Mangolia-Heil Annexation No. 54 to the City of Westminster and direct the Executive Officer to transmit the matter to the Board of Supervisors for final action. Respectfully submitted, Richard T. Turner Executive Officer RrT/JDB/ff cc : City of Huntington Beach City of Westminster r> 't NECI xVI'. DECIARA1. IOiV - 'tea PROPOSAL Proposed annexation 'to the City of Westminster_ designated "Give Magnolia-Heil Annexation No. 54 (Transfer of territory from the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster. ) pI10P0:3i NT : Orange County Board of. Supervisors LOC_1TION: 4.4 acres located on the south side of Heil Avenue and on the west side of Magnolia Street in the east Huntington Beach area. RE uES'T : To consider environmental factors, relative to the: transfer of territory pursuant -to the California Environmental. Act of 1970. FINDING: No significant effect on the environment. j Reasons 1. The annexation area is substantially developed primarily a.s apartment developments. Future construction iiz the area will be limited to a vacant .acre parcel zoned �or commercial use. '.2. The transfer between cities will provide for re logical municipal boundaries in the area. 1IF-ARINC DATE: ` b�lh 1 t June 12, 1974 ST 100, DATED: May 211 1974 ICELARD T. T U2iEAR . Executive Officer .'. ` • Loral Agency rormation Commis for f ..(Request for Negative Declaration. Status) 1974 M.10RD T. T;:; ;, C;; �J„'J 0 -10ER t" P�L`T^„+;,y ... F LOM- 1 AGENCY F01',%,!AT;0j Co,%1,411SSIGN i (1,:0TE: Not all proposals will necessitate the preparation of an tnvironmcntal Impact Statement. In order to make a aetex-:'1ir,ation as to whether any significant environmental impacts may result 5 from the proposed project , the following Preliminary Environmental Description must be filled out and submitted to the, ;executive 0-river of the Local Formation Toration Commission. A "yes" response to any of questions 3 through 18 , (and the lack of an adequate explanation of extenuating circumstances in item 19) will indicate that signi- ficant environmental impacts may result from the proposal and there® fore., an EIR must be submitted.) :J -: As soon as possible, the Executive Officer will determine whether or not the project will require an Environmental Impact Report and will notify the project proponent accordingly. Please. fill out the following: • . I. State the title of the proposal; _ E Me, S74 Ia. Describe the proposal including its location and full address. �+�'� �®sue( � e- kima-� 4 , AedeS aF Wev�®,0ee1 de- w, "r6,4 0 CA 4aev 2 Could the proposal. disrupt or divide an Yes NO established coma-ainity or disrupt orderly, planne.cl devclopment or is it inconsistent with plans and goals that haA, been adopted by the Co' ='Mnity in which the Proposal is located? Could it Cause increased congestion or result in higher densities than desired by the community? 3. Could the proposal result in the temporary yes . ... No or permanent displacement or annoyance of neighboring community residents? I& Could the proposal have an effect on Yes- No -natural , ecological, cultural or scenic resources of national, state, or local concern? S.'. Is the proposal in an area characterized by Yes- No unique physical. features? Is the proposal near the shoreline , near any natural or partially channelized flood plains, or on any hillsides visible to surrounding properties? Could views by neighboring property owners Yes No be disrupted by the proposal? Could any geologic features (slide prone Yes No ._�areas, earthquake faults, etc. ) cause adverse- conditions- -to result from this proposal? -8 ;Could the proposal disruptor alter the Yes No appearance of the surroundings of a historic or archaeological site? 90. Could the proposal affect the potential use, Yes No extraction or conservation of a scarce natural resource? 10. Could the proposal affect the continued use Yes- NO of a recreational area or area of important aesthetic value? .. 11. Could any wildlife or unique vegetative Yes- No communities be disrupted or displaced by the proposal? -Could any wildlife migration patterns be disrupted by the proposal? 12. Could existing noise levels be increased yes T�O by this proposal (including during its consn!uction period) to the extent that Present Or future residents or passers-by would be annoyed to any degreb? Would recreational or wildlife areas be detrimentally affected by noise increases? "7 13. Could the proposal increase air pollution Yes— 1'o levels in the area or exceed any existing air pollution standards? Particulate matter (dust) as well as chemical pollutants should be considered. 14. Could any unique characteristics be intro® Yes No 'duced into the areas atmosphere , such as sonic booms , radiation, annoyin electronic -transmissions , vibrations, etc, .� Could the proposal have any detrimental Yes No— • effect on existing water quality or 4Lidntities, of either surface or sub- surface supplies? VOO 16. Could the proposal establish any precedents Yes NO ' or facilitate any other projects of which the impacts of these may be significant? Could the project serve to encourage development of presently undeveloped areas or intensify development of already undeveloped areas? (Examples include the ifit-roduction of facilities such as streets , _ ds water mains or sewerage lines in du'ch a manner as to facilitate development or intensification of the use of an area.) 176 Could the proposal generate a controversy? Yes No 18. Are there any feasible or less environ® Yes— NO—V Mentally offensive alternatives to -this jitdgosal? C r. 19e if ybu h Jve `11SWCrOd yes to one or arc of the above • questions ,s , but still thin; the proposal will. not or cannot have .nny significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons bcloti'r: o i I? gam- ED BY. 6 `} (� t.. '�" DATE Mailing Address . �- � � '�� !� t� � R, Ile : . '. ZAP CODE 1 Phone Number; Area Code 9S l/ NIC TIVE DEC1.-A RATION PROPOSAL: Proposed annexation to the City of Huntington Beach designated Huntington Center .Annexation No 1 PROPDXL'I\IT : Orange County Board of Supervisors LOMTION: 3;7 acres located southwesterly of- the - San Diego Freeway immediately north of Huntington Beach Shopping .Center in the south Westminster area. REQ LEST : To consider environmental factors, relative to -the: transfer of territory pursuant to the California Envi.ronmental. Act of. 1970 FINDING: No significant effect on the environments Reasons 1 At present, the transfer of this territory will] not alter the present land use. ' Upon annexation to the City bf Huntington Beach, there will probably be 'immediate pressure for' commerci development. r 20 Annexation of the property to the City of Hunt' gton Beach will provide for more logical boundaries in th area. .. - • - kx LEI-. M AY W. F. ST JONN; COMy Merl? 11EAR11\7G DATE: June 12, 1974 DATED: May 219 1974- i; IUUi I.I) T . TUR,�iEP. ' ' Executive Officer EEO [-, ' FOP. EXF:.�iPTION DECLARATION `�1���i� • :_CITE. OF IiUNTINGTON BEACH ` MAY " .6 1974 MUM T. i 1iii�E , EXECi1Tl'JE C1fFiGER "Y Nn' f!full For City use only PIWJECT NW-IBEIR ED 74 - 38 City of Huntington Beach r I DEPT. OF ORIGIN, Applicant or Authorized Agent or '� �'�' '� Consultant PERMIT No. Box 190 , H.B . 92648 Mailing Address _ WNTINGTON BEACH 5 3 6-5 2 0 5 -PLANNING DEPARTMENT Telephone Number MAR 2 0 1974 Property Owner P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, Calif. 92648 Mailing Address NOTAT Not all projects trill necessitate the preparation of a fully documented Enviroxnental: linl�act Report. In order to make a determination as to whether any nl.J'iCa 11 environmental impacts may result from the proposed project, the fol- Ioairt ; requost for exemption ueclaration status must be filled out and submitted to the yip ropciate -department. ' As soot; as �:��siblc, the Errvircn:� ntal Rev:i.ew Doard N��i_11 de.terrline� whether or rot the project tai11 require -a«- Envlruamental Impact Report and will notify tI,e pro- Joct sponsor accordingly. Please fill out the fo1_lowin 1.0 Project I.ntormation 1.1 Nature of Project:: Give a canple.te description of the proposed project. The City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster have mutually agreed to transfer areas of their respective cities by an annexation and de-annexation process . These areas are approximately the same size _._... __-and are physically separated from the contiguous city limits by the San Diego Freeway. LAFCO ' approved this transfer on October 31 , 1973 . A more complete de- scription of the project and the intent of the Council is enclosed. -1- I Uf IUC;1. , 6) 1�C,S, ii ar:ct cis:ocia, -3 facilities. Property presently in Huntington Beach is zoned R3 and C4 ; property presently in 1estminster is zoned C4 . The property in Huntington Beach has apartments on approximately 3 acres and I acre is vacant commercial . The' C4 property in Westminster is completely vacant. b. If the project is commercial or industrial, give a complete description of activities. N/A 1.2 Location of Project: Street Address See attached DM maps Side of Street Are you including a project plan, map and/or rendering? Yes No . Please indicate project location on the accompanying City neap (page 7). I 1.3 Legal description: Lot See attached dat1310cic Tract Section Township Range , OR ' Metes and Bounds: i 1.4 Project land area (acres): approximately 4 . 5 acxes each parcel 1.5 Present use and zoning of land: y HB ` - C4 & R3 u Westminster -- C4 4 1.6 Will the project alter the present use of the property? How? i 3 At present , this exchange of property will not alter the present use. The C4 property when annexed to Huntington Beach will probably undergo immediate pressure for commercial development . 1-10\,7 are the SUrrOL1- MO areas zoned and what are 'r prescriL uses? The', property on Heil & Mqanolia is bordered on the west and north and south by the San Diego Freeway . Property on, the no 0 east is residential . The property or, Center Street is bordered on the north and east by the,San Diego Freeway. There is C4 property to the west and C2 (Hunting-ton Con-or) to the south . 1.8 Wh a t wi I I be the maximum occupancy of the project? (lf commercial or industrial usage, indicate occupancy in terms of employees and customers.) N/A 1.9 Traffic: N/A a. Estimate projects impact on traffic volume on arterials. b. Indicate points of egress and ingress to the project. c. Does the project create any traffic problems? ( I !,'Or the appropriate questions, the applicant should indicate it the project wi I I affect the en vironment to (1) no extent, (2) a trivial extent, (3) a moderate extent, or (4) a significant ex-Lent. If either- (1) or (4) are marked, the applicant must explain the impact on a separate page. Choice (5) will be marked by the Environmental Review Board if the applicant's choice i unacceptable. 2.0 Impact Upon Existing Natural Resources . 1 2 3 4 5 2.1 To what extent, if.any, will indigenous wildlife be- affected by the project? , X ,1 2.2 To what extent if any, will,any animal migration patterns be disrupted by the project? X . 2.3 To what extent, if any, will any unique animal or plant life be disrupted or displaced by the pro- ject? 2.4 To x:,hat extent, if any, x1l.11 wildlife areas be detrimentally affected by noise increases due to the project? X 2.5 To what extent, if any, will the natural physio- -graphic characteristics of the land be changed? -3- I 2 3 4 2. 6 `Co wjiat. exte.nL, any, will the project incrc,21--t\ air pollution 1, Is (include parLiculates, prii,.,try Cinissions; and Photoche",zlical products)? X 2. 7 To that. exLt,nt, if any, will the proposed project have any detrimental effects on existin- water qualities or quantities, of either surface or subsurface supplies? 2.8 Mat is the distance from the project to a; Shoreline . . . . . . . miles Natural flood plain h 'Ood plain Channelized flood plain 0 2 t mile Hillside . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 H--- Bluff . . . . . . 2 m-4 I 2.9 Is the project near, or on, a potentially dangerous "C1010-iC feature (e.g. slide ProAp areas, earthquake faults)?:. No X Yes (Explain) d It is 2 1/2 miles north of the north branch of the Newport Inglewood fault . 3.0 Impact Upon Man Made facilities 1 2 3 4 3.1 To what extent, if any, will the project have an adverse affect on either a cultural or scenic re- sourc e? X 3.2 To what extent, if any, will any plionorit2na such as radiation, vibration, or air wave disruption be introduced into the project area's atmosphere? X -�-3-3 ---Ta what extent, if any, will the project affect the use of the comunity.'s recreational areas? X 3.4 To what extent, if any, will the project affect basic governmental services (e.,,. police, fire, sewage treatment, roads, education, fresh water demand) , and the present and future ability of government to provide such services? X 3.5 To vhat extent, if any, v;ill Lhe project serve to encourage develop<aen-,- of presently undevel- oped areas or to intensify the developm2nt of already developed areas? X 4.0 Impact Upon The Social Environment .4.1 Iniat will be the extent, if any, of negative eco- nomic effects upon the area? X -4- 1 2 3 4 5 4,. 2 To what extenL, ii y, trill the project disrupt or divide, an established cor{nu{pity or an orderly, planned development? X 4.3 To whaL e::Lent, if any, will. the project disrupt or alter the appearance of the surroundugs of an: Historical site? X Archaeological site? X �. Paleontological site? X 4.4 To what extent, if any, will existing noise levels be increased by this project? X 4.5 To what extent, if any, will views by neighboring property oimers be disrupted by the project? X 5.0 Tmp;cct Due To Construction 5.1 To wflat extent, if any, will construction of the project affect the immediate area's 3 Water quality and/or demand? X Noise levels? —X}( Air duality? X j' Solid haste disposal .facilities? 5.2 Sih tt is the volume of r..atexial excavated during construct:ion? None 6.0 Miti.-atJon Measures ' 6.1 Briefly describo c:-hat is being done to minimize the short term impact on the en- vironment caused by con traction (e.g. , dust abatem--nt, working hour restrictions, ti noise abat:eraerit): 1 , Alone anticipated i j �r11ef.1.Y (C! C,11,'c w"-It 1,, b:.i...v dorv-, to m!.i.!_ralze thC: project s adverse 1mp1Lts on Lli^ enviro: m--zi . (both l.on- and short: term i-Ir'L icts): There are no adverse impacts on the environment. ` 1 2 3 4 %..�; Suy"r.o011dinc,^I Zvir.oumeiic To what. extent sloes the surroundin- environment impact u�i the project, with respect. to: . Noise levels? X Air quality? _X w_ Water quality? X Energy demand? X Solid haste disposal demand? X Traffic volume? X Population density? X 8.0 Fina1 Statement Are there any feasible and less environmentally offensive alternatives to this project Yes (Explain) No X (Explain) � The City Council has for some time been trying to consolidate these two pieces of land with the respective city boundaries . k It makes more sense from the standpoint of city services . This exchange will bring into each city that area presently being served by each city. NOTE : In accordance with city law, if in -fact- this subject pro- ` perty is not prezoned by the city, it automatically becomes R1 upon annexation . Therefor , it is recommended that upon annexa- tion immediate rezone proceedings be instituted . i, Mel Tooker . Printed Name r iMarch 20 , 1974 S gnatuie hate City of Huntington > Beach • 4;, P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92640 —^Y OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK i April 22, 1974 i I i Richard T. Turner, Executive Officer Local Agency Formation Commission a: P.O. Box 687 Santa Ana,, California 92702 SUBJECT: HB - Westm. Property Exchange Dear Mr. Turner: The requested changes have been made. on the legal and map for Heil-Magnolia Annexation No. 54 to the City of Westminster. To correct both cities resolutions, Westminster and Huntington Beach adopted new resolutions for your consideration and hearing. A copy of LAFC's approval of Huntington Center Annexation No. 1 (Resolution No. 73-178) is attached to Westminster Resolution No. 1527, for your reference. Enclosed are certified copies of Westminster Resolution No. 1527 and Huntington Beach Resolution No. 3861 for hearing by LAFCO. Sincerely yours, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW:tr Enc• CC: David D. Rowlands, Huntington Beach City Administrator Katharine C. Harper, Westminster City Clerk l t es4riF-flon ea i rra;'_, o rap:a;cc cr7rieration __ ' .<...a;_ Meet tile, C ppl'ovol of t'te Surveyor's 01c ice PROPOSFD HEILL--NIAGI;oI. T k!TrJT?XAT TOFZZ NO< 54 (`.LTPAI`nSFF1 J T :CLRRI``__.1'X 'FtC�*.f rT ,K �:r C_ '1 1 G Thai: portion of the riorthaast or:e-quarter of the southeast ona- quarter. of Sect:ioln 24 , Township 5 South, Range 11 67cst, and that pow Lion of the northwest one-quarter of the 3outhwE::3€: One -quarte_r of Section 19, Township 5 S'outh, zzange 10 tzE Wit, all in the Rancho Las Dol.sas, presently in the City of. Huntington Beach, County' of Orange, State of California, at.; shotna on a map recorded in book 51, Page: 1.3 of Miscellaneous Mla.ps in the offices of .the County Recorder of na.id County, descr i :e_cl as, follows Beginning at the intersection of the easterly e:tc—13ion of- a line parallel x-At-h and 20. 00 feet southerly, measured at right angles from the north: line of said northeast: erne--gl Tarter with a line parallel with and .30. 00 ' feet easterly, easured at right angles from tlx:: east lire of said northeast. o qua.rter, said point of intle -section being an anglo point in' the present- City boundary line of thcs City of 1-11u `.tington Beach as described in 'Northeast No. 1 Annexation" Ordinance Ido. 688 of the -City of Huntington Beach, also b^irg an angle point. :in the present City ►:,ounclary line ne of tine City of We,strminster as described in "Annexation No, 31" Ordinance No. 1171 of the City of Westirii.nster_ and also a point an the present City boundary line of- the City of Fountain Valley as described in "Incorporation" of the City of Fountain-Valley; thence- south 01 19 ` 46" i;,est 1126. 86 feet along the before mentioned parallel line, also being the present common boundary line of the City of Huzntington Beach and th.e City of fountain Valley to its intersection with the centerline of th.e San Diego Preeway Route 405_ as shown on a map filed in Book 4 , Page 49 of State Highway Map Hooks in the office of the County Recorder of said County; .thence leaving the last mentioned connon City boundary lines and following along said freeway centerline north 44° 011 46" west 1277.64 feet to a curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 12, 000. 00 feet; thence nort;lwesterly along said curve and freeway centerline thru a central angle of 1° 271 54' an arc distance of 306. 84 feet to a non-tangent line parallel with and. 20.00 feet -southerly, treasured at riga'it angles, from the north line of said nori:h- eF-,nt ogle~CTitaa_rter, said line also being the present corax)n City bouncia ry` li,:�2 of the .City of i c:ntingt:on 'D ach and tl.e City of t" Strninst:er as . EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 PROPOSED HEIL- 1-17�GNOLTT, NO. 4 TO THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER (TRANSFER OF TERRITORY, FROM CITY OF hUN INOTON BEF.C!1j describcd in the before mentioned despcctiva ondinances, thence South 89' 30, 10' cast 11.10. 56 feet 010`-g said parallel line e.nd :5-ts easterly 'extension, to the Point of Beginning. j • I I Page. -2- I PROPOSED HUNTINGTON CENTER ANNEXATION NO, 1, TO THE CITY 0)? (TRANSFER OP TEURITOaY MOM Cli-� Cl,-F Vj-XMINSTZX) That portion of the northeaot one-quarter of the southeast one-quarter of Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 11 weat, in the Raacho Las Bolsaa, preaently in the city of Westminster, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps Q the office of the County Recorder of said County, describe! & follong: Beginning at the aouthwent corner of acid northeast one-quarter, said corner being an angle point in the present common boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach as described in North No. 3 Annenation, Ordinance No. 686 of the city of Huntington Beach, certified by the Secretary of State May 9, 1958, and the city of Westminster as described in Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120 of the city of Westminster, certified by the Secretary of State October 22, 1959; thence north 0*16126" east 557.05. feet along the `west line of said northeast oze-quarter and the before mentioned courmon Citys boundary line to its intersection with the south- westerly right of way line of the San Diego Freeway Route 405 as a%own an a map recorded in Book 3, page 24 of State Higbway map books in the office of the County Recorder's office of said County; thence leaving the before mentioned Cityu common boundary and following along said freeway right of way line south 45'231110 east 233.28 feet; thence continuing along said freeway right of way south 45'59'03" east 4 572.91 feet to its intersection with the south line of said northeast one-quarter also being the common boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach and the city of Westminster; thence north 89'31106" west 580.75 fad along said south line and said common boundary line to the Point of Beginning. This description d map.of proposec, annexation _ r066t approval Of thp. !_7Yj11V1 EXHIBIT '!B • EnVIRonMEnTAL REVIEW BOARD 14 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH•CALIFORNIA �'- P.O. BOX 190 92648 TO : Honorable Mayor and City Council, Attn: City Administrator FROM: Environmental Review Board DATE : April 9 , 1974 SUBJECT : Exemption Declaration 74-38 (for transfer of property between Huntington Beach & Westminster) The Environmental Review Board at its meeting of April 9 , 1974 , granted the above exemption declaration, having found that the proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect upon the physical environment . No environmental impact report has been prepared for this project , and the Negative Declaration issued for the project has .been properly posted in the office of the City Clerk. Additional Information : F The Board' s findings are based upon the information submitted and apply to the change of jurisdiction only, with the assumption that .,the properties immediately north of Huntington Center will be rezoned to commercial upon annexation to the City of Huntington Beach. James W. Palin, Secretary Environmental Review Board. JWP :df MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 2, 1974 IN RE : CANCELLATION OF TAXES CITY OF BUENA PARK On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the request of the City of Buena Park for the cancellation of taxes, which would result in change to the tax' roll in excess of $15,000.O in assessed value on the following described property is granted and so ordered and the County Auditor-Controller is ordered to cancel any tax, penalty or costs levied against the property acquired and to transfer to the .Unsecured Tax Roll the pro rata portion of taxes for which the assessee remains liable. Code Area Parcel Effective Date of Cancellation 14-037 70-731-05 All 12-31-73 IN RE : EXERCISE OF OPTION TO EXTEND LEASE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH PANNIER, ET AL On motion of Supervisor Baker, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the Director of Real Property Services is authorized to sign the letter advising Lessor of County' s exercise of option to extend for one year the existing Department of Mental Health lease at 2215 N. Broadway, Santa Ana, California, GA 1217-3.01. , 3.. 1;, with Loren C.: Pannier, et al, s recommended in his letter dated March 26, 1974. IN RE: PROPOSED CONSENT TO TRANSFER PROPERTIES CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER On motion of Supervisor Baker, .duly seconded and unanimously carried, the matter of the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster proposing to transfer territory from one city to a contiguous city, is referred back to the Local Agency Formation Commission. i a F 1013-2.2 - i i ` 2 March 11, 1974 TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution Transferring Certain Property in Huntington Beach to Westminster and Consenting to Transfer of Property Located in Westminster to Huntington Beach At the request of the City Clerk, we transmit herewith a resolution which authorizes an exchange of certain properties between the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster. This resolution is being resubmitted (it was previously adopted on November 19, 1973) , at the request of the Local Agency Formation Commission, in order to correct in error in Exhibit A (the legal description and map for the property presently located in Huntington Beach) . Respectfully submitted, DON P . BONFA City Attorney DPB : lm Attachments December 17, 1973 Board of Supervisors County of Orange P. O. Box 687 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Gentlemen: Pursuant to S. 35270 (7) of the Government Code, we are D transmitting Resolution No. 3788 of the City of Huntington Beach and Resolution No. 1511 of the City of Westminster regarding consent to transfer certain properties located in the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster. Also enclosed is a copy of the Resolution of LAFC© approving said land exchange. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Encs. cc: Katharine Harper, City Clerk City of Westminster Huntington Beach City Administrator ' 1 1 �1 ._ 4■■ f{z1/�C�f7� ,�//JJF�I(yy�1`����{{`�,1L�1�y/�y�J�l J,I..I�(`/' _�' _ ::: _..e-y +mom ® �Y✓'���VVhT Y^V CIVIC CENTER7, 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 714 CODE 893-4511 December 12 , 1973 Ms . Alicia Wentworth City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Ms. Wentworth: Enclosed is a certified copy of" Resolution No. 1511, which was adopted by the City Council at its regular meeting of December 11; 1973 , for the transfer of. .certain territory located in the City of Westminster to the' City of Huntington Beach and consenting to the transfer of certain territory located in the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster. Please transmit this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors along with your Resolution No. 3788 .- Sincerely yours, CITY OF WESTMINSTER e Katharine' C: Harper City Clerk KCH:o Enclosure ' O ORANGE COUNTY ® SOUNTY OF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING P. O. BOX 687 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 RAN CM AREA 834-2239 O AREA-CODE 714 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MEMORANDUM CHAIRMAN CLIFTON C. MILLER Date : October 24, 1973 MAYOR CITY OF TUSTIN To : David D. Rowlands _ Alicia M. Wentworth VICE-CHAIRMAN RALPH A. DIEDRICH From: Richard T. Turner Executive Officer SUPERVISOR THIRD DISTRICT Subject : Proposed annexation to the City of Huntington Beach designated Huntington Center No. 1 ROBERT W. BATTIN Annexation SUPERVISOR FIRST DISTRICT In compliance with Bylaw No. 32 we are forwarding copies STAN NORTHRUP of reports from the following county departments : REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC Flood Control District Assessor LOUIS R. REINHARDT Sheriff' s Department COUNCILMAN CITY OF FULLERTON ALTERNATE DAVID L. BAKER SUPERVISOR SECOND DISTRICT I ALTERNATE REE BURNAP REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC I ALTERNATE ROBERT J. NEVIL COUNCILMAN CITY OF LA HABRA RICHARD T. TURNER EXECUTIVE OFFICER ..dj l City of Huntington Beach P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK November 21, 1973 Mrs. Kay Harper, City Clerk City of Westminster 8200 Westminster Avenue Westminster, California Dear Kay; Enclosed is a copy of Resolution No. 3788 adopted November 19, 1973 relative to our land swap. Have fun converting it for your own situation. When your resolution is adopted, please forward a certified copy and I will transmit both to the Board of Supervisors. See you at Hollywood Park on the 29th. Let me know if you need a ride. Sincerely„-, Alicia Enclosure AMU:smc _ � Q D� 0-to November 13, 1973 TO: City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution to Transfer Certain Territory Located in the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster and Consenting to the Transfer of Certain Territory in the City of Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach At the request of the City Administrator, we transmit herewith resolution to transfer certain territory located in the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster and consenting to the transfer of certain territory in the City of Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach. The property to be transferred to the City of Westminster is located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Heil Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach, and the property to be transferred to the City of Huntington Beach is located on the north side of Center Drive between Gothard Street and Beach Boulevard in the City of Westminster. Each transfer of territory has been approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission. Respectfully submitted, DON P. BONFA City Attorney /er Attachment O I s ORANGE COUNTY © u NJ—g—"Ir ®F= ADMINISTRATION BUILDING R / P. O. BOX 687 h.- fsry SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE: 834-2239 . AREA CODE 714 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION October 16, 1973 CHAIRMAN CLIFTON C. MILLER MAYOR Local Agency Formation Commission CITY OF TUSTIN County Administration Building Santa Ana, California VICE-CHAIRMAN RALPH A. DIEDRICH In Re : Proposed annexation to the City of Westminster SUPERVISOR designated Magnolia-Heil Annexation No. 54 . THIRD DISTRICT (Transfer of territory from the City of Huntington IBeach to the City of Westminster) RCBERT W. BATTIN SUPERVISOR Gentlemen: FIRST DISTRICT . This proposal to annex territory to the City of Westminster STAN NORTHRUP consists of approximately 4.4 acres presently within the city REPRESENTATIVE OF limits of Huntington Beach. The application to the Local GENERAL PUBLIC Agency Formation Commission was made by the City of West- Iminster. The subject territory is located on the south side LOUIS R. REINHARDT of Heil Avenue and on the west side of Magnolia Street. The COUNCILMAN southwest boundary of the proposal is the center line of CITY OF FULLERTON the San Diego Freeway. Territory north of Heil Avenue is in the City of Westminster and territory to the east of ALTERNATE Magnolia Street is in the City of Fountain Valley. DAVID L. BAKER SUPERVISOR If the proposal meets the approval of the Commission the SECOND DISTRICT affected cities are going to proceed with the transfer of Ithe territory pursuant to Government Code- Section 352?0 et ALTERNATE seq. - REE BURNAP REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC Section 35271 states : - - Proceedings to transfer territory from one city to a ALTERNATE . contiguous city are initiated by filing with the board ROBERT J. NEVIL of supervisors of the county in which the cities are COUNCILMAN CITY OF LA HABRA situated either Y a. A petition signed by not less than 25 percent of the RICHA T. TURNER EXECUTIVE OFFICER registered electors residing in the territory to be transferred if the territory is inhabited, or Page 2 R ' In Re : Proposed annexation to the City of Westminster designated Magnolia Heil Annexation No. 54 (Transfer of territory from the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster) b. A petition signed by owners of not less than one-fourth of the land in the territory by area, and by assessed value as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the county in which the territory is situated if the territory is uninhabited; or c. A resolution of the legislative body of the city in which the territory is situated. _ .There shall be filed with the petition a resolution of consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative body of the city in which the territory is situated. In every case there shall be filed with the petition or resolution a resolution of consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative body of the city to which it, is proposed to transfer the territory. The petition of resolution shall contain a description of the territory proposed to be transferred, the name of the city in which the territory is presently included and the name of the city to which it is proposed that the territory will be annexed. The territory was part of the City of Huntington Beach Northeast No. 1 Annexation and was annexed to the City in May, •1958. With the construction of the San Diego Freeway through this. area several years ago the properties became separated from other territory in the City of Huntington Beach. Development on the subject properties consists of 80 apart - went units and the northbound on-ramp of -the San Diego Freeway at Magnolia Street. The population of the area is estimated to be 160 persons. There are 26 registered voters. Three parties including the State Division of Highways, are , the owners of the properties. In the Justification of Proposal submitted with this annex- ation it is stated the City of Westminster services are more readily available to the properties than the services of the City of Huntington Beach. Due to the location of the San Diego Freeway emergency services such as police and fire Page 3 In Re : Proposed annexation to the City of Westminster designated Magnolia Heil Annexation No. 54 (Transfer of territory from the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster) could be better provided by the City of Westminster. The subject territory is provided sanitary sewer and trash services by the Midway City Sanitary District. Water service is by • the City of Westminster. The proposal is a part of an agreement worked out between the cities of Westminster and Huntington Beach for the exchange of properties along the San Diego Freeway to pro- mote more logical and uniform city boundaries. The City of . . Huntington Beach is agreeing to the transfer of this territory to the City of Westminster in exchange for the transfer of territory -from the City of Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach of approximately 3.7 acres of land adjacent to the Huntington Beach Shopping Center. The trans- fer of that property is designated the "Huntington Center Annexation No. 1" which is also on the Commissions agenda for October 31, 1973. On June 13, 1973, the Commission determined a sphere of influence for the City of Huntington Beach. In the staff report on the sphere of influence it was pointed out that on three different' occasions the Commission gave approval to the City of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley to allow the transfer of territory from one jurisdiction to another to provide more uniform city boundaries along Newland Street. This. information was included in the staff report to bring to the Commission' s attention that the City of Huntington Beach has been attempting to provide for more uniform city boundaries. At that time staff was involved in discussions with the City of Huntington Beach and the-City of Westminster regarding the transfer of territory from one jurisdiction to another in the vicinity of the San Diego Freeway and east and west of Beach Boulevard. The subject annexation is one of the transfers .that was being discussed. In the staffs sphere of influence report it was suggested that if there was a future exchange of territory between the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster after a sphere of influence was determined for the city of Huntington Beach, 1 R Page 4 In Re : Proposed annexation to the City of Westminster designated Magnolia Heil Annexation No. 54 (Transfer of territory from the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster) the sphere of influence could be reviewed and updated to reflect any transfer of territory and realignment of city boundaries. Due to the alignment of the San Diego Freeway in this area, more adequate governmental services and controls to the subject territory can be provided by the City of Westminster. This proposal will also promote more uniform city boundaries between the cities. of. Huntington Beach and Westminster. Staff recommends approval of th s---annexat on,-subj•e,ct—to—any—conditions the Commi * ern` —V,em necessary. CStaff would .also suggest that if approving action is taken and the transfer of the territory to the City of Westminster is completed, the sphere of influence of the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster be reviewed and updated. Respec�ful"ly:submitted, Richard T. Turner Executive Officer RTT f ih cc : Katherine C. Harper, City Clerk, City of Westminster City of Huntington Beach 1 MSOLUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CO MISSION 2 OF ORANGE CaMMY, CALI 'ORKIA 3 October 31s 1973 4 ,` r2 On motion of Commissioner Northrup, duly seconded and 5 -carried, the following resolution was adopted., 6 WH117REAS9 after due notice provided by law. a public hearing 7 was -held by this Commission on a proposed annexation to the City of $ Westminster designated. Magnolia-Heil Annexation No. 54; and 9 Wk F-kS, by action of the City Council of the .City of 10 ��7O inster application was filed with this Commission requesting 11 approval of a proposed transfer of territory from the City of Huntington 12 Beach to the City of Westminster; and 13 147DWIASO said application was accompanied by .a statement 14 of action of the City Council- of the City of Huntington Beach agreeing . 15 to this proposed, transfer of territory° in exchange for a transfer of 16 territory from the City of Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach. 17 NOV19 ITEM.EFORE v Is IS .HEREBY RESOLVED that the, boundaries of 18 the territory propose4- to be detached from the City of Huntington Beach 19 and annexed to the of Westminster are more specifically described 20 in that� certAin e'gal description entitled Kagmol.ia- Heil Annexation 21 No. 54. (Traaasfer. 6f;territo rr from e Citj� pf Huntington Beach to the 7. 22 City of We tminete )r attached- h®ret® and by this reference grade a part 23 hereof; and 24 - MIT FURTHER RESOD that said annexation is hereby 25 approved. 26 AYES: COP sisIOlms s-TAX", IfORTHRUP, LOUTS R. REINURDTO ROBERT J. 27 MIL, ROMMT W. BATTIN AND RALPH A. DIEDRICH 28 NOES: COF'I SSIO ,S. NO1VE 29 ADSEMT, COMMISSIOMS NOVE 30 31 32 Resolution No a ?3-179 I STATE OF CALIFORAU ) 2 COMM OF ORANGE ) 3 1, RICHARD To TURM, Executive Officer of the Local Agency 4 Formation Commission of Orange Count', California, hereby certify that 5 the above afid foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted by 6 said Commission at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 31st day of 7 Octobero 1973. 8 IN 14I ESS WHEREOF, 1- have hereunto set my hand. this 31st 9 � of October, 1973® 10 RICM.RD T o °1 . Jet Executive Officer of the 11 Local Agency potation Commission of Orange Count ,,- California 12 13 By 14 e;retar 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 - 30 31. 32 Resolution No. 73-179 "PiTs uescr zpfiion cmd map or proposed annexation , ��: _ meet the, approval oi-r the, Surveyor's Otrice �.7 7� - 1 PROI'OtlI;!) H�?�II CITY ?ITNET�Y;.ATIO'. tll0 54 . �TOTffF C OF �•t l:<�i'1'11 iY.71�.T2 (TRANSFER OP `J ??R.CT1,-)RY P.0-M CITY G±' That portion of the northeast ore-quarter of the southeast one- quarter of Section 24, Township 5 South, 11,ange 11 �.est, and that port-i.or of the nort«.aest one-quarter of the southwest one-quarter of Section 19, ``outh Izanc>e 1.0 West, all in the Rancho Las Bolsas presently Township 5 .:: � r in the City of Huntington beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map recorded in Kook 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows Beginning at the intersection of the .eastterly extension of a lire parallel with and 20. 00 feet southerly, measured at right angles from the north line oil said northeast: one-quarter, with a line parallel with and . 30. 00 feet easterly, measured at right angles from the east line of said northeast one-quarter, said point of intersection being an angle point in the present City boundary line of the: City of Huntington Beach as described in oNort~heast. No. 1 Annexation" Ordinance No. 638 of the City of Huntington Beach, also being an angle point In the present City boundary line of thie City of Westminster cos described in "Annexation No. 31" Ordinance No. 1171 of the City of Westminster and also a point on the present City boundary line of the City of Fountain Valley as described in "Incorporation" of the City of Fountain-Valley; thence south 01 19' 46" west 1126.86 feet along the before mentioned parallel line, also being the present cornmon boundary line of the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Fountain Valley to its intersection with the centerline of the San Diego Freeway Route 405_ as shown on a map filed in Book 4 , Page 49 of State Highway Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of said County; thence leaving the last mentioned common City boundary lines and following along said freeway centerline north 440 01' 46" west 1277.64 feet to a curve, concave to the southwest having a radius of 12, 000. 00 feet; thence northwesterly along said cur-kTe and freeway centerline thru a central angle of 1° 27 ' 54' an arc distance of 306.84 feet to a non-tangent line parallel with and 20.00 feet -southerly, measured at right angles, from the north line of said north- east one-quarter, said line also being the present conm)on City boundary line of the .City of Huintingt-on Beach and the City of 1%7ostminst,er as Page 1 PI:OPOSFD HELL-P.,IkGNOL:IA NO. 54 10 IaIB CIIl OIL v.F':. .MINSIER (TRANSFER OF TETRIT'OI Y, FROM CITY- OF I-MNTI G`Z`ON BFACIji described in the before mentioned respective ordinances, {r4hence south 891 301 10" ea.nL 11- a. 56 al.on.:s said parallel )in'o end �s easterly extension, to the Point of Deginninge a Page, -2- Awl, 11 "e" L. MCCONVILLE ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR �7 ��` � �/✓ //� C/�<� ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WEST SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 TELEPHONE 714-834-3456 ROAD DEPARTMENT October 16, 1973 R EC E IV E D PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. OCT 18 1973 City of Westminster CITY OF WESTMINSTER 8200 Westminster Ave Westminster, Calif. , 92683 1st Check Attention Dave Gillette Gentlemen: ,The following discrepancies were found pertaining to proposed Heil-Magnolia Annexation No. 54 to the City of Westminster. Description remarks: 1. In parentheses under title add: " (Transfer of Territory from City of Huntington Beach"). 2 . Page 1, line 4: "Rancho Los Bolsas" should read : "Rancho Las Bolsas" . 3 . Page 1, lines 17 and 18: According to County Records the reference of "Annexation 1, Resolution No. 1005" should read: "Incorporation" . 4. Page 1, line 22 : Delete the word "Recorded" and insert "filed" . 5. Page 2, line 4: The word "arch" should be "arc" . Map remarks: 1. NOTE: Where boundary lines are identical with other lines on the map use only one line to delineate same. City of Westminster - 10/16/73 - Page 2 Heil-Magnolia Annexation No. 54 to the City of Westminster v 2. Correct the reference for the City of Fountain Valley. (No. 3 of description remarks) . 3 . Correct title. See note No. 1 under description remarks. Please return the corrected description and map to the Boundary Section of the County Surveyor' s Office. Very truly yours, L. McCONVILLE Road Commissioner and County Surveyor fbertBy. V. Wise Deputy County Surveyor y3Lt - 35-10 RVW:EC:ik ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ,,_-)ISTRICT OCT . ? 1973 OCT 15 1973 IY=al ASOPAY ► rIGNARD T. TURNEk EXECUTIVE 017FICCR P 0 am 687 to AMM caurovate 70 hle Is 14 vespowe to your request for a report ad- viesbilitye In terms, of general public latereot prop eafterAties to tho city of Huntington Beach desi t Huatiaston I Center Aummatiou No., Ie located on the southwesterly side of the San Diego ;ply of 'Mcr s A-vew The property to audeveloWand is =w within the city of W"twinster. Center Drive which runs along wrly boundary to fully UWrWed and tbo Proverty is elevated above the s At s=b t1w to the property Is .doveloped rom4ftj S=diva of the land and the eowtvwtion o afte dvaimse, facilities for the Pro"r that of storm vwwff will be waassavy, Stogy runoff frw tM property will ultimtely be disobAfted to a City of Wmt- Instou 'aftch storm themal to tho ocuth and west. &Wexatloft of the property ity of Wets' to the City of Reativatan Bsa;h appear to b* leeftal. fm o f lood coa- trol *n4 drai*WK t _ point.avA therefore approml, to.. ift vory truly Yours* ORIGINAL SIGNED BY H. G. OSBORNE H. CIS o chi-of 24614"t u act City" of Huntington BOM11 t } L 1 i PRELIMINARY AGENDA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA =OBER 31, 1973 2:00 P.M. pLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION WEARING OF 'WITNESSES I CONSENT CALENDAR MATTERS (Items Al - A7) A .1 matters on* the Consent Calendar are to be approved by one motion unless a Commission member requests separate action on a specific item) A. PROPOSALS TO BE CONSIDERED UNDER SECTION 56261 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE ;SET FOR DETERMINATION WITHOUT NOTICE AND HEARING i 1. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE GARDEN GROVE SANITARY DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. K-345-73 Approximately 3.25 acres located north of the Garden Grove Freeway and west of Knott Street, in the west Garden Grove area. Filed by the Garden Grove Sanitary District on behalf of the property owner. L PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE GARDEN GROVE SANITARY DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. K-353-73 Approximately 0. 37 acre located on the south side of Chapman Avenue and west of Roger Drive, in the north Garden Grove area. Filed by the Garden Grove Sanitary District on behalf of the property owner. 3. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE GARDEN GROVE SANITARY DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. K-364-73 Approximately 4. 15 acres located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard and on the south side of Hazard Avenue, in the west Santa Ana area. Filed by the Garden Grove Sanitary District on behalf of the property owner. 4. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO MIDWAY CITY SANITARY DISTRICT BROOKHURST STREET NO. 5 ANNEXATION Approximately 20 acres located on the east side of Brookhurst Street north of Edinger Avenue, in the east Westminster area. Filed by the Midway City Sanitary District on behalf of the property owner. PAGE 2 AGENDA - LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 0r,TOBER 31 1973 5. . PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. 3D-BOLSA CHICA ROAD ANNEXATION (UNINHABITED) Approximately 104 acres located south of Westminster Avenue and I east of Bolsa Chica Road, in the west Westminster area. Filed by County Sanitation District No. 3 on behalf of the property owner. i ITEMS A6 -A7 ON CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CITY ANNEXATIONS INVOLVING LESS THAN 20 ACRES, HAVE BEEN LEGALLY NOTICED IN NEWSPAPERS AND ALL PROPERTY OWNERS 'EVE CONSENTED TO ANNEX 6. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM e RED GUM - CORONADO No. 3 ANNEXATION Approximately 0.93 acre located on the north side of Coronado Street west of Red Gum Street, in the northeast Anaheim area. Filed by the City of Anaheim on behalf of the property owner. 7. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN SAN JUAN - BROWNING ANNEXATION N0. 82 ( Approximately 2.75 acres located on the southwest side of San Juan Street and on the northwest side of Browning Avenue, in the east Tustin area. Filed by the City of Tustin on behalf of the property owner. . PROPOSALS TO BE CONSIDERED BY PUBLIC HEARING: I 1. PROPOSER ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. 3E-BOLSA CHICA ROAD ANNEXATION (INHABITED) Approximately 53.6 acres located south of Westminster Avenue and east of Bolsa Chica Road, in the west Westminster area. Filed by County Sanitation District No. 3. i f 2. - PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LA PALMA - KRAEMER ANNEXATION Approximately 26. 7 acres located on the south side of La Palma Avenue and on the west side of Kraemer Boulevard, in the northeast Anaheim area. Filed by the City of Anaheim on behalf of the property owners. WAGE 3 1 AGENDA - LOCAL AGENCY FORWION COMMISSION OCTOBER 31, 1973 i 3. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON CENTER ANNEXATION NO. (Transfer of territory from the City of Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach) Approximately 3.7 acres located on the southwest side of the San { Diego Freeway north of the Huntington Beach Shopping Center, in the- northeast Huntington Beach area. Filed by the City of Huntington Beach. I _ 4. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER . MAGNOLIA-HEIL ANNEXATION NO, 54 (Transfer of territory from the City of Huntinggton Beach to the City of Westminster) Approximately 4.4 acres located on the south side of Heil Avenue and on the west side of Magnolia Street, in the south Westminster area. I , Filed by the City of Westminster. i i i 5. PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUSTIN ` IRVINE-MYFORD ANNEXATION NO. 81 i Approximately 489 acres located southeasterly of Browning Avenue, between Irvine Boulevard and the Santa Ana- Freeway, in the east Tustin area. Filed by the City of Tustin. r. I I ' I SPHERE OF INFLUENCE TO BE CONSIDERED IN COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNm9NT CODE SECTION 54714 j 1. REVIEW AND DETERMINATION OF A SPHERE OF INFLUENCE FOR THE CITY OF STANTON i I I J . MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 10, 1973 E. OTHER COMMISSION BUSINESS ORANGE Cv UNTY FLOOD CONTROL ^ISTRICT OCT 12 1973 'r C Local Agency Formation Commission P. 0 lox 687 Santa Ana, California 92702 Gentleman: This is In response to your request for a report on the a d- v1sabi.litym In terms of general public iuteratt, of the proposed aoraexetion to the City of Huntington Beach designatted ee Huntington Centaur Annexation No, lr located on the southwesterly side of the San Diego Freeway southeasterly of McFadden Avenue. The property Is undeveloped o d is now within the. City of Westminster. Center Drive which runs along the southerly boundary is fully improved and the property is elevated above the street. At such time as the property is developed remedial grading of the land and the construction of onaoite drainage facilities for than proper disposal of storm runo9f will be necessary. Storm ruaoff from the property will ultimately be discharged to a City of Hunt- ington Beach stores channel to the south and west. Annexation of the property now in the City of Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach appears to be logical from as flood con- trol amd draimSe standpoint and therefore approval is recomuended. Very truly yours, t'�P,Sr,�MPI SIGNED BY H. G. OSBORNE H. C. Osborne, Chief Engineer WDD dm act City of Huntington Beach z O ORANGE COUNTY ® OU NTY O F ADMINISTRATION BUILDING P. O. BOX 687 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 R TELEPHONE: 834-2239 o RANGE AREA CODE 714 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION October 9, 1973 City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 CHAIRMAN Huntington Beach, California 92648 CLIFTON C. MILLER MAYOR Attn: Alicia Wentworth, City Clerk M CITY OF TUSTIN VICE-CHAIRMAN RALPH A. DIEDRICH Gentlemen : SUPERVISOR THIRD DISTRICT Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Local Agency Formation Commission of ROBERT W. BATTIN Orange County on October 31, 1973 at 2 :00 P.M. ) UPFPV ISOR in Room 503, Orange County Administration Building, FIRST DISTRICT 515 North Sycamore Street , Santa Ana, California on proposed annexation to the City of Westminster STAN NORTHRUP designated Magpolia & Heil Annexation No. 54. REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAI. PUBLIC Pursuant to Bylaw No. 25 representatives of cities and districts may be required by the Chairman of the Com- LOUIS R. REINHARDT mission at the time of the hearing to present , or to COUNCILMAN have previously filed, a resolution of the legislative CITY OF FULLERTON body of the city or district authorizing such representa- tives to appear on behalf of the district or city. ALTERNATE Authorization may be for a specific proposal or, generally, DAVID L. BAKER for any proposal under consideration by the Commission. SUPERVISOR SECOND DISTRICT Ve truly your ALTERNATE REE BURNAP RE PRESENTATIVE T OF Richard T . Turner EN ERA PUBLIC PUBLIC Executive Officer ALTERNATE RTT/ih ROBERT J. NEVIL COUNCILMAN CITY OF LA HABRA RICHARD T. TURNER F_XFCUTIVE OFFICER 011ANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT JAMES N_ MUSICK, SHERIFF CORONER Ott�14j�� ft`•„ October 8 , 1973 g CCT 9 1973 FIC.gARD T. TURNE1' EXECUTIVE OFFICER AGENCY FC;T.!.ATIQ C01,11+Ic. Local Agency Formation Commission Orange County Administration Building P.O. Box 828 Santa Ana , California Gentlemen: RE : REQUEST FOR REPORT ON PROPOSAL - PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH DESIGNATED HUNTINGTON CENTER AN- NEXATION N0. 1 Pursuant to your request for a report on the advisability in terms of the general public interest as they relate to the special concern of the proposal as indicated above , we do not find, upon review of the information submitted that there is any information in our hands that we believe would be of significance to the Com- mission. Very truly yours , JAMES A. MUSICK, SHERIFF-CORONER Robert H. Sharp , Undersheriff RHS: ae R i i i POST OFFICE BOX 4 4 9 • SANTA A N A , C A L I F O R NIA 9 2 7 0 2 • TELEPHONE ( 7 1 4 ) 9 3 4 - 2 C O n ��^' JACK P. VALLERGA �` COUNTY ASSESSOR TELEPHONE: 834-2727 � AREA CODE 714 5 AL N am. iI 630 NORTH BROADWAY CIVIC CENTER PLAZA ENTRANCE P. 0. BOX 149 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR .October 4, ,1973 ' OCT P,„CHARD t. Til � 'CAL AGUtC,,, [,�rLMr IIO CoM�rilS� Local Agency Formation Commission Mr. Richard T. Turner, Executive Officer Orange County Administration Building 515 North Sycamore Street Santa Ana, California HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON CENTER ANNEXATION NO. 1 Here is our analysis of the proposed annexation: This annexation does cut property as presently assessed. In our opinion, this annexation will not result in -` double taxation unless the City will be furnishing a public service already provided by a district within the area of the annexation. This annexation is not acceptable to the Assessor' s l Office, as the map and description are not compatible. , Az CK P. VALLERGA, ounty Assessor JPV:ah 1 Page 3 In Re : Proposed annexation to the City of Huntington Beach designated Huntington Center Annexation No. 1 (Transfer of territory from Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach) it is stated that all municipal services necessary for developmen, of the property can be readily provided by the City of Huntington Beach. It is further stated the property has the potential ,of becoming an intregal part of the regional shopping center located immediately to the south. The proposal is a part of an agreement worked out between the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster for the . exchange of properties along the San Diego Freeway to promote more logical and uniform city boundaries. The City of Westminster is agreeing to the transfer of this territory to the City of Huntington Beach in exchange for the transfer of territory from the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Huntington Beach of approximately 4.4 acres located at the southwest corner of Heil Avenue and Magnolia Street. The transfer of that property is designated "Magnolia-Heil Annex- ation No. 54" which is also on the Commission' s agenda for October 31, 1973. On June 13, 1973, the Commission determined a sphere of influence for the City of Huntington Beach. In the staff report on the sphere of influence it was pointed out that . on three different occasions the Commission gave approval to the city of Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley to allow the transfer of territory from one jurisdiction to another to provide more uniform city boundaries along Newland Street. This information was included in the staff report to bring to the Commission' s attention that the City of Huntington Beach has been attempting to provide for more uniform city boundaries. At that time staff was involved in discussions with the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster regarding the transfer of territory from one jurisdiction to another in the vicinity of the San Diego Freeway and east and west of Beach Boulevard. The subject annexation is one of the transfers that was being discussed. In the staff' s sphere of influence report it was suggested that if there was a future exchange of territory between Page 4 In Re : Proposed annexation' to the City of Huntington Beach designated Huntington Center Annexation No. 1 (Transfer of territory from Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach) the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster after a sphere of influence was determined for the City of Huntington Beach, the sphere of influence could be reviewed and updated to reflect any transfer of territory and realignment of city boundaries. Due to the alignment of the San Diego Freeway in this area, more adequate governmental services and controls to the subject territory can be provided by the City of Huntington Beach. This proposal will also promote more uniform city boundaries between the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster. Staff recommends approval of this annexation, subject to any conditions the Commission deems necessary. Staff would also suggest that if approving action is taken and the transfer of the territory ,to the City of Huntington Beach is completed, the sphere of influence of the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster be reviewed and updated. `Respectfully submitted, Richard T. Turner Executive Officer RfiT/ih cc : Ci -y of Westminster Attn: Kay Harper, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach Attn: Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk y r CIVIC CEN-rk_k 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 714 CODE 893-451 1 September. 18, 1973 Huntington Beach City Council P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Members of the Citv Council: I must apologize for an inaccurate statement I made before your Honorable Body on September 17. I can say it was an honest mistake, and I believed the statement when I made it. I have subsequently reviewed the minutes of the Westminster City Council of September 11, and have discussed the matter with Mayor Anthony. i I was apparently outside the City Council meeting room briefly during the September 1.1 meeting when the proposed exchange of property between the two cities was discussed. At that time the Mayor and one member of the Westminster City Council did consider utility services and water supply problems and corunented on the similarity to the property under consideration in your Use Permit 7332. The j Westminster City Council then took action to defer the property exchange for further studv and consideration and instructed the staff to consider an undeveloped parcel for exchange. i After discussing the matter with Mayor Anthony, I still believe that the members of the. Westminster City Council did not defter the property exchange as a threat to II the City of Huntington Beach concerning the other matter. Later in the meeting, the Westminster City Council received notice of your public healing and adupCed a mot ion 'to direct me Co represeTit the city at vour hearing, without any discussion. I do sincerely regret the inaccuracy of my statement, but continue to believe that the spirit of my statement was accurate. i i Respectfully, i CITY OF WESTMINSTER Ro5ert J. Huntley -_ i City Administrator. RJII:jm i i �I 4 O ORANGE COUNTY ® /OU N-rY O C ADMINISTRATION BUILDING O � S r P. O. BOX 687 .,....,.... SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE: 834-2239 o �" RANG E AREA CODE 714 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION 040RANDUM CHAIRMAN CLIFTON C. MILLER Date : September 13, 1973 MAYOR CITY OF TUSTIN To: Cities, Districts and interested parties VICE. AIRMAN From: Richard T. Turner, Executive Officer RALPH A. DIEDRICH SUPERVISOR (� /�� T �y�/� THIRD DISTRICT Subject • Change of LAFC meeting date ROBERT W. BATTIN Due to State Supervisors Conference, the regular SUPERVISOR FIRST DISTRICT meeting of the Local Agency Formation .Commission of October 24, 1973 has been rescheduled to Wednesday, October 31, 1973. STAN NORTHRUP REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC Any proposals to be set for hearing .for the meriting of October 31st, must be on file on or before October 5, 1973. LOUIS R. REINHARDT The next regular meeting after the October 31st hearing COUNCILMAN 'j(`�'$ CITY OF FULLERTON Will be November 14, 1.97_'!• - I I ALTERNATE DAVID L. BAKER SUPERVISOR SECOND DISTRICT I ALTERNATE REE BURNAP REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC ALTERNATE - t ROBERT J. NEVIL COUNCILMAN ' CITY OF LA HgBRA RICHARD T. TURNER EXECUTIVE OFFICER EXCERPT FROM MINUTES OF THE WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 11, 1973 A regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Westminster was held on September 11-1973, , at 2; 394.m_ COUNCILMEN PRESENT: ANTHONY, FRY, GILLESPIE, JARRETT, NEUGEBAUER COUNCILMEN ABSENT: NONE PROPOSED EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY WITH HUNTINGTON BEACH The Council received a recommendation to authorize the sub- mittal of a proposal to LAFCO to annex approximately 4 . 4 acres of land at the corner of Magnolia and Heil to the City of Westminster in exchange for approximately 3. 7 acres of land adjacent to the Huntington Beach Shopping Center, now in the City of Westminster, to be annexed to the City of Huntington Beach. Mayor Anthony suggested that it might be deferred because of the possible implication with the current project where Huntington Beach is planning to put an apartment development on another piece of land, which was one of the locations for a possible exchange , and he thought some of the problems are similar, particularly the water supply. He added, it occurs to him that one of the reasons that Huntington Beach wanted to exchange this property is because they could not supply water, and the very same problem exists in the proposed prop- erty exchange. Councilman Neugebauer stated that she agreed, and would prefer to exchange land for an undeveloped parcel rather than the parcel at Magnolia and Heil, which is to be developed in high density apartments. She asked the staff to research the possibility of exchanging a different parcel of land in Huntington Beach. Councilman Neugebauer moved to defer and instruct the staff to consider an undeveloped parcel for exchange; seconded by Councilman Fry, and unanimously carried. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS. CITY OF WESTMINSTER) I. KATHARINE Co HARPER, City Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Westminster, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of the minute entry on record in this office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 24th day of September 19 73 `yo C1 Clerk of the City Council of the City of Westminster, California CC 6-6412 STATEMI OF THE ACTION OF CITY COUNCIL Council Chamber, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Tuesday, September 4, 1973 Mayor Matney called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:00 P.M. Councilmen Present: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs , Green. Coen, Ih iace, Matney Councilmen Absent: None 14EST •1INSTER ANNEXATION a SUBMISSION OF JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL AUTHORIZED �C A 7� The City Administrator informed Council of his recormendation that Council authorize the submission- of Justification of Proposal to the Local Agency Formation Commission to permit an exchange of properties between the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster, as follows : Annexation to the City of Huntington Beach of approximately 3. 7 acres of land ad- jacent to Huntington Center m annexation to the City of Westminster of a 4.4 acre tract of land located at the corner of Magnolia Street and Heil Avenue. On motion by Green, Council authorized the submission to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Justification of Proposal relative to the aforementioned annexation of property to the City of Huntington Beach. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Coen, Duke, Matney NOES : Councilmen: None ABSENT : Councilmen: None On motion by Bartlett the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 11:00 P .M. to September 17, 1973at 5 :30 P.M. in the Gothard Street Fire Station. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs , Green, Coen, Duke, Matney NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City ATTEST: of Huntington Beach, California. Alicia M. Wentworth Jerry Matney City Clerk Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ) County of Orange ) ss: City of Huntington Beach ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meetipg held on the 4th day of sar�i emhe-r 19 7-1 WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this the 10 th day of September 19 73 Alicia M. Wen-��,orrh City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California BY Dep y t ' PROPOSED HEIL-'•IACNOLIA ALNN XATION No. 5i TO THE CITY OF WES11'21 TINS T ER That portion of the northeast one.-quarter of the southeast one-quarter of Section 24, Townslhip 5 South, Range 11 Wast, and that portion of the north est one-quarter of tl:e south'veest one-quarter of Section 19, Tcwnship 5 South, Range 10 'West, all in the Rancho. Los Bolsas, presently in tlia city of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a map record-ad in Book 51, Page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Rerord.er of said County, described as follows: Begirmil?g at the intersection of the easterly extension of a lira parallel with and 20.00 feat southerly, measured at right anglas from the nortn line of said zhorthQ�:st one-quarter with a line parallel with and 30.00 feet easterly, :ens+__=rad g right uligl2s fro: the east lily of sair? Z]Ori;":2clit oR?-quarter, said _3�= ?t Qf Intersection being as angle point in the, p:'2serit City boundary tin of the city of Huntington Leach as described in "t.'crtheast No. I Annexation" Ordin3h,ce No. 583 of the city of Huntington beach, also be?r.0 an angle point in tlh preaen" City boundary line of tl-:a city of Westminster as described in "Annexazioa No. 3111 Ordinance No. 1171 of the city of Westminstar and also a point on the present City boundary line of the city of. Fountain Valley as described ih "Afinexatiorc 1" RA3olu- tien .,o0 1QG5 0� the city of Fountain. Valley; thence south 0°19140" hest Ii2v,85 ,. f feet along the before chLationad paraliei line, also b2ing the . pre:�enL cocu:on bou^aary line of t .e city of Huntington Bach and the city of Fountain- Valle- to its iL:terS2ctiQn w1tih the, centerline of the San Diego Free,:hy Route 405 4s s?ho,.n an a -map .recorded in Book 4, page 49 or State. Highway Map Book; in the of ice of the County Recorder of said County; thence leaving tlha last mentioned cof-i on City i ... _. ..._ .. 1, ,...._ ., . .. .. ._ , .. . .. Proposed Heil-Magnolia A vexation No. _` - to the City of Westminster - Page 2 boundary lines and following alone, said free y centerline north 44001146" Est 1277 .64 feet to s curve concave to the south -�st having a radius of 12,000.00 feet; trenc= northwesterly along said curve and freeway centerline thru a central angle o- 1°27154" an arch distance of 306.84 feet to a non-tangent line parallel with and 20.00 feet southerly, measured at right angles, frcm the north lino of said north-aast one-quarter, said line also being the present camdon City boundary line of the city of Huntington Beach and the city of Westminster as described in the before mentioned respective ordinar:ces, thence south 89*30110" east 1110.56 feet aloe; said parallel line and its easterly extansion, to the Point of Beginning. Y i b g } t Mug of 'Wrotminsur CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER. CALIFORNIA 92683 714 CODE 893-4511 September 12, 1973 Mr. David D. Rowlands City Administrator City of Huntington Beach P. O: Box 19Q Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Rowlands: Subject: Exchange of Property r The City Council, at 'its regular meeting of September 11, 1973, unanimously voted to defer an exchange of property to be submitted to LAFC4 by the City of Westminster for annexation of approximately 4.4 acres of land at the � corner of Magnolia Street and Heil Avenue in the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster. This would be in exchange for property located in the City of West- minster consisting of 3.7 acres of land adjacent to the Huntington Shopping Center, to be annexed to the City of I, Huntington Beach. This proposed exchange of property has been pending since October, 1972. e will Deep you advised of any further action taken on this proposed exchange of property. Sincerely yours, CITY OF WESTMINSTER Katharine C. Harper ' City Clerk KCH to cc: City;Clerk, City of Huntington Beach September 11, 1973 Local Agency Formation Commission 515 North Sycamore Street Santa Ana, CA 92701 Attention: John Bell Dear Mr. Bell: The City council of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting hold Tuesday, September 4, 1473, authorized the submission of Justification of Proposal to LAFCO of Huntington Center Annexation No. l in an exchange of property with the City of Westminster. Enclosed is the Justification of Proposal, minute action and brown Lines of the map and legal descrip- tion. If approved, a Resolution will be adopted for submis- sion to the Board of Supervisors. Sincerely, Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk +T sp Enclso f i t ,rd� - ,.:' �'�'d�:n` a '�" ` { ��:, 9 "��.a'F i�"r t -.. �� k �'�-f ''' t'•. 'P?t.uE Y z; "''�*E' ID3<-'�^s 5� x 35255 CITY GOVERNMENT Title 4 K, 1) may contain a request that the question be submitted whether the prop- erty to be annexed shall be subject to taxation equally with the property with- in the annexing city to 1 a specified portion of the bonded indebtedness of ,t. g Y P Y P $ . the annexing city outstanding at the date petition is filed. § 35260. Wv Article 4.5 Transfer of Territory from One City to a " R Contiguous City 35270—FORlt'1[ 1. Procedural Checklist for Annexation—Gov- u y ernment Code §j 35270-35280—AIternate Method of Transfer of Territory from One City to Another � 1. Local agency formation commission approval. _ The local agency formation commission must first approve the pro- �, posal. § 35002. (See §§ 54790-54799.5 for general procedure.) r.„ pk u 2. Petition circulated or resolution adopted. �r �' The proceeding to transfer property from one city to a contiguous city is � A tp initiated by voter or landowner petition or resolution of the city council in x which property is located. The contents of the initiating document are pre- �' scribed. § 35271. .�� ��•�- - 3. Petition filed. If the proceeding is by petition, the petition is filed with the board of �. supervisors and must be signed either by (a) 25U/e of the registered electors residing within the territory if it v is inhabited; or � F+ (b) owners of at lest 25 percent of the land by area and by as- ,"#kt sessed valuation it the territory is uninhabited. § 35271. 4. Resolution by council of city from which territory is transferred. F • If the proceeding is by resolution, the city council of the city from which ss the territory is to be transferred adopts a resolution. § 35271. g 5. Consent by city from which territory is transferred. sNJ 24 'q If the proceeding is initiated by petition, the council of the city from which the territory is to be transferred shall adopt a resolution of consent to xx�r the transfer. § 35271. Consent by the city from which the territory is being � - transferred is not necessary under certain limited circumstances. § 35271.5. 520 a £�;'ir sX a.,,"....... ak _ n Div. 2 ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY 35270 Form 19. Canvass of returns. r The returns are canvassed. A majority vote in favor of the question is � required. If the proposition is not approved, no election for the exclusion -` of any of the same territory may be held for one year. §35254. W 20. Approval of transfer. ' If a majority of the votes favors the measure, the city council adopts a . resolution showing the total number of votes and the votes cast for and ; against the measure. § 35255. In this resolution the board of supervisors should also approve the transfer. § 35279. The board may also fix the date when the transferred property is a part of the city. 35279. 21. Filing with the Secretary of State. The city council enters an order in its minutes directing the clerk to send a certified copy of the resolution (or abstract of the vote) showing the nun- s her of electors voting and the vote for and against exclusion to the Secretary of State. 35255. 22. Secretary of State's certificate. „ The Secretary of State files the document and transmits his certificate of filing to the city clerks of both cities and to the board of supervisors. § 35256. 23. Affidavit of completion. Ak� The city clerk of the city conducting the election files the affidavit of completion with the county recorder. §§35257,34080. 24. Filing with State Board of Equalization,etc. _ There must also be filed with the county assessor and State Board of Equalization a statement of boundary change. §§ 54900-54903. This should be done by the clerk of the board of supervisors although this duty is not im- posed on the clerk in the case where an election is held. § 35278. 25. Effective date and outstanding bonded debt. : If the board of supervisors does not specify a date when the transferre,l property is a part of the city which is different than the date provided by law, the territory is a part of the city from the date of filing with the Secretary of State. § 35279. The territory remains liable to taxation for those debts of the city from which the property is transferred which existed at the time of the transfer. § 35280. 26. Changes in districts as a result of annexation. Consideration should be given to procedures under the District Reor- ganization Act, Government Code sections 56000-56550 when territory be- comes a part of a city. The local agency formation commission may make approval of the incorporation or annexation proceeding under the Knox-Nis- bet Act, Government Code sections 54773-54799.5 conditional upon pro- 523 M F� :P r f } S Y 3 4 ��' ���. »1,^,�i�_ ,'.•, ��,,,a '��-.F..z+"'+�'�� .,k'FS,. '�?4'1t,*:��a �.�L�x� ° ;-"'�°4 :f... Z'�z.�G'si'�� .2•s�" +� t��x� Y "'�i.`ns l" ��..:.e�arsu..uy�"- "'ar7,�' }r � e 35270 CITY GOVERNMENT Title 4 Form ceedings under the District Reorganization Act. § 54790.1. If the local agen- cy formation commission has not given a conditional approval, consideration can later be given to a change in district organization initiated by the city YY council, with the approval of the local agency formation commission. Such changes in organization might be any one of the following: Detachment of territory from a special district. 56310 et seq. (b) Merger of a district with the city. § 56400 et seq. , ,•: (c) Establishment of the district as a subsidiary district if 80 percent of the district lies in the city. § 56403(b). h 'r (d) Dissolution of a district. § 56360 et seq. � (e) A reorganization, including annexations or detachments. § 56430 s et seq. 270-COMMENT. Reference to Forms for Proceeding Forms for the steps described in the Procedural Checklist are not in- cluded for the annexation procedure prescribed by in Government Code sec- tions 35270-35280. The forms contained elsewhere in this chapter can be easily adapted. See the forms set forth above under Government Code sec- tions 35001-35015, 35100-35158, 35200-35213 and 35250-35260. s Article 5. Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939 v .`. § 35300-I+OpM 1. Procedural Checllist for Annexation under 't the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939 —Government Code §§ 35300-35326—Less than 12 Registered Voters in Territory j 1. Local agency formation commission approval 1 sl The local agency formation commission must first approve the proposal. § 35002. See sections 54790-54799.5 for general procedure. The local agen- x cy formation commission may dispense with its hearings and authorize the city to dispense with notice and hearing if all owners consent. § 54797.1. 2. What is uninhabited land. The annexation procedure under this statute applies only if the land is F: contiguous and there are not more than 11 persons qualified to vote (re,i rtered 54 days previously) residing within the territory at the time the petition is filed or the city initiates the procedure. § 35303. On the element of Coll 524 `E �y 35270 CITY GOVERNMENT Title 4 . paA Form ceedings raider the District Reorganization Act. § 54790.1. If the local agen- cy formation commission has not given a conditional approval, consideration 21 can later be given to a change in district organization initiated by the city council, with the approval of the local agency formation commission. Such changes in organization might be any one of the following: (a) Detachment of territory from a special district. 56310 et seq. K X. " (b) Merger of a district with the city. S 56400 et seq. (c) Establishment of the district as a subsidiary district if 80 percent of the district lies in the city. § 56403(b). (d) Dissolution of a district. § 56360 et seq. (e) A reorganization, including annexations or detachments. 56430 ? et seq. 35270-C®ilIMENT. Deference to Forms for Proet 1ding ' Forms for the steps described in the Procedural Checklist are not in- cluded for the annexation procedure prescribed by in Government Code sec- �� �+ tions 35270-35280. The forms contained elsewhere in this chapter can be easily adapted. See the forms set forth above under Government Code sec- _ � t tions 35001-35015, 35100-35158 35200-35213 and 35250-3-260. ..; Article 5. Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939 35300-Foam 1. Procedural Checklist for Annexation under ,.. the Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act of 1939 —Goveri,-vent Code §§ 35300-35326—Less than 12 A Registered 'Voters in Territory a< 1. Local agency formation commission approval b Y pP �y. The local agency formation commission must first approve the proposal. 35002. See sections 54790-54799.5 for general procedure. The local agen- cy fornrition commission may dispense with its hearings and authorize the city to dispense with notice and hearing if all owners consent. § 54797.1. ............ � 2. What is uninhabited land. The annexation procedure under this statute applies only if the land is "� }, P 11 ) . , contiguous and there are not more than 11 persons qualified to vote (re-is- � � A tered 54 clays previously) residing within the territory at the time the petition is filed or the city initiates the procedure. 5 35303. On the element of con- � 524 N Div. 2 ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY § 35300 Form tiguity see sections 35302, 35002.5 and 35304.5. Land which may be an- nexed raider this statute may also be annexed under sections 35400-35423 and 35450-35458. 3. Petition circulated and filed. J Property owners representing at least 25ro of the land in area and 2517o of the assessed value within the territory file a petition with the city council. § 35305. An alternative method of initiating proceedings is by city council. See step 7. 4. Clerk checks petition. The city clerk examines the petition and certifies as to its sufficiency. 5. ,Procedure if all owners consent. If the petition is signed by all of the landowners within the territory to be annexed or if all of the landowners give their consent to annexation, the - notice requirements, the hearing procedure and the action of the council at the conclusion of the hearing are different. § 35310.1. See step 9 below. 6. Resolution giving notice. The city council adopts a resolution giving notice of the proposed an- nexation. § 35305. The contents of the resolution are prescribed. § 35306. If the owners of all the land have signed the petition or consented, the reso- lution must so state. § 35310.1. Among other things, the resolution fixes the time and place for hearing protests. The hearing date must be fixed for a time between 40 and 60 days after adoption of the resolution. § 35307. If the owners of all the land have petitioned or consented to the annexation, the hearing date must be within 30 days after the council adopts the resolution. -� § 35310.1. In this resolution the city council may also fix a date when the annexation becomes effective if it is completed. § 35306. 7. Initiation of proceedings on council motion. As an alternate to the petition method, the city, council has the option of initiating proceedings on its own inotion without a petition. To do so, the t city council adopts a resolution giving notice of the proposed annexation (as " in step 6) but the resolution states in addition that the council is initiating =` the proceeding and the resolution describes the reasons for desiring annexa- tion. § 35310. S. Notice of annexation to school district. If a school district has made a written request for notice of annexation proceedings, the city clerk sends a copy of the resolution to the governing board of each school district which is included in the territory proposed to be annexed. § 35305. 525 } F, s _....:a..�.,.�.sr���,:.as.....�:.:«.�'vr..,.�\....w.+�..-,ate-...:;�:.:,u..... `�z�. i�-:x;�'�.:.��u?.„fi4v-'..' e' a ••.- ....:.u.���:..et..y�. 3�'�.'� z ..„.i,°'"�, .� .35' F - All § 35300 CITY GOVERNMENT Title 4 Form t � _ 9. Notice of hearing. The city clerk gives notice of the protest hearing on the annexation by publishing and posting the resolution and mailing notice of the annexation to F all property owners and to others requesting it. § 35311. If the owners of 3 all the land have petitioned or consented to the annexation, the city clerk pub- figv fishes or posts only. § 35310.1. The local agency formation commission may dispense with this hearing if all the owners have consented. 54797.1. 10. Protests; who may file; time and form of protest. MV � � Property owners within the territory may file protests at anytime before the hearing is closed. The protest must be in writing. Who is an owner for this purpose and. the contents of the protest are prescribed. § 3531.2. 70 11. Protest hearing. rr, The city council holds the protest hearing and passes upon all protests. A protest by owners of one half or more of the value of the property ter- minates the proceeding. If publicly owned property or privately owned tax exempt property lies within the territory, its value for protest purposes is ` 4 fixed by the county assessor in the same amount as if it were not exempt.The protestants have the obligation to obtain these values and submit them to the t' city council. 5 35313. 1 +� If an of the territory is tide or submerged lands owned by the State the z Y Y b �4 1p State fixes the value for determining a majority protest and the city coun- cil may either follow this value or fix its own value. If it does not accept the State's value, it must bring an action to have a court fix the value. 35313.1. 12. Council findings. W The city council closes the protest hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, the city council adopts the resolution finding and declaring that a majority protest is or is not made. The resolution must be adopted within 30 days after it closes the hearing. If a majority protest is made no fur-° ther annexation proceedings may be taken for one year without unanimous rt consent of all the property owners. § 353132. q 13. Changes in boundaries. f rsr � If a majority protest is not made, the city council may make changes Nin the boundaries but may not enlarge them and may not diminish the land area by more than 5 fo. If the council wishes to make changes, it must re- � y submit the boundaries to the local agency formation commission for recon- 'r sideration. §§ 35313.5, 35313.6, 54799.1. 14. Ordinance approving or disapproving annexation. t The city council adopts an ordinance approving or disapproving the an- W vexation. The council must act within 60 clays after the protest hearing. If ..�� the council does not act within 60 days, the proceeding is disapproved. If 526 MN gn x `,' ly �F�!����� �y.Y.��r� .��� �"."-a, esbr=>m•¢sv* {r"""�7 .,�;�„�� � " �'f � ` v�r a1;7E i�'�`.��;',�",-u���,}a*2`'�z5c�;':�':'�:�� �:,§.: �" '�"`� �'f�'�y M y t t �F Div. 2 ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY § 35300 A Form I the council does not approve annexation no newannexation proceeding cov- ering any of the same territory may be filed for one year from the date of disapproval. §§ 3531.4, 35315. If the proceeding has the unanimous consent of all landowners, approval of the annexation is by resolution adopted with- �. in 30 days after the :hearing. § 35310.1. 15. Effective date of ordinance and filing with Secretary of State. n, The ordinance becomes effective 30 days after final passage. § 36937. When the ordinance (or resolution if the proceeding is under section 35310.1) becomes effective, the city clerk sends a certified copy of it to the Secretary of State. .§ 35316. rv` 16. Secretary of State's certificate. The Secretary of State files the ordinance (or resolution) and transmits his certificate of filing to the city clerk and to the board of supervisors. § 35317. 17. Affidavit of completion. The city clerk files the affidavit of completion with the county recorder. f § 34080. 18. Filing with Board of Equalization,etc. The city clerk files the statement of change of boundaries and a map or plat with the State Board of Equalization and the county assessor. §§ 54900- 54903. 19. Effective date of annexation. The territory is a part of the city from the date of filing with the Sec- retary of State or the date of filing the affidavit of completion with the ` i county recorder under § 34080, unless the council fixed a different date in the resolution h f i i dving notice o the proposed annexation under 35306 (step giving P P § ( P ` 6). § 35318. L 20. Services performed by district. If a special district lies partly or wholly in the annexed territory, the city and the district inay agree to have the district continue to perform services for the annexed territory until the end of the fiscal year. § 35318.1. 21. Outstanding bonded debt. n`, The liability of the annexed territory for taxation fo pay the debts or ; liabilities of the annexing city existing at the time of annexation is as follows: 1 (a) Property in the annexed territory is not subject to taxation for indebtedness or liability existing at the time of annexation unless the owners of more than `'/3rds of the value of the territory file written 527 ro,✓+, P :�.g t z f �-! '". >r_7 "• y �-,�, r .,s�r::�;�,.�W;u. s::a+a..,�.:.,�..�.� '•� �4 .,�,, "ram" a .����s�.: �,F:w-'F.c.�...tu�.$�s:..:rr s��''.^..":r5�'.' �..�.�.r:*.:�Y ,. �x�; ' a -�r- Ml,� 35300 CITY GOVERNMENT Title 4 Form I s consent with the city clerk. The written consent must be filed prior to the adoption of the ordinance approving annexation. §35319. (b) If the territory annexed was previously in another city, the property remains liable for bonds or other obligations which were a lien at the time the property was excluded. §35320. * � 22. Annexation costs. The cost of the annexation proceeding is aid b the annexing city P g p Y � �. � whether or not the proceeding is completed. § 35321. 23. Changes in city wards. If the city is divided into wards, the council must adopt an ordinance al-tering the ward boundaries to include the annexed territory. In altering the ward boundaries, each ward shall contain an equal number of inhabitants k eligible to citizenship as nearly as possible. §§ 35322,35323. 24. Changes in districts as a result of annexation. � a Consideration should be given to procedures under the District Reor- i � t �w ganization Act, Government Code sections 56000-56550, when territory be- w jg comes a part of a city. The local agency formation commission may make x. T approval of the incorporation or annexation proceeding under the Knox- Nisbet Act, Government Code sections 54773-54799.5, conditional upon proceedings tinder the District Reorganization Act. § 54790.1. If the local ' >3 agency formation commission has not given a conditional approval, consid- a Y a Pl . . er-ition can later be given to a change in district organization initiated by the k «f city council,with the approval of the local agency formation commission. Such ` �,. changes in organization might be any one of the following: vas (a) Detachment of territory from a special district. § 56310 ct seq. (b) 'Merger of a district with the city. § 56400 et seq. (c) Establishment of the district as a subsidiary district if SO percent of the district lies in the city. § 56403(b). .. (d) Dissolution of a district. § 56360 et seq. (e) A reorganization, including annexations or detachments. § 56430 arim et seq. s $}H Library References: C.J.S. Jlnnicipal Corporatioiis § 41. Nest's hey No. Digests,Aluideipal Corporations G-33. M r x 1� ( �. 3 ° '. 4 523 a 5p'. { m- d y''��y��. }5'...M"-k- +�• '"'�"§r, ° cF'�'4`.5.°�-"w, T 'u '.tea s :'.. xh"''o.s ..k `� w-�'ab'na'r �i�: ,,,w" i35 '7 ^�r r £.;..�i :;., "' ..,.,, xT'�`f , , ud` �'*-�, � *'��, ....iak r � x �',r,{ic',. ,?" :{ Y +F :'M'.��`«}� s. -r-'� f �?� � � �.. s}' .E,r a'z- "', �t `�„ •s - ...at `5 3 ti..� �. ✓" x 'r�z .w ro ..•b'Jy ,i. w$...' r ,qac r�.�.� �,.�` $' z,'r.i '�t�",az i�' � �..•. t 4`„* '... 7` �.:. .,-4 .4y,$*��,. r� �"it-,s- s.4`��+':;✓ �a� ' ..!%�. r�a�+r�`.���3 -:< �'K:!x }'S�,�.'J.��' t�n .3'r �'1..:�y "5r�..tia+.- �xw'.�.t�".s; ea,�:: '�."a'd �-4� ,�... v.+' ak -_.',, .'�'M-...-.r .....r�s �'.� F r ^4 >,- a� t..is.t� ,..;., .Z�.x:.:s�. r'�` -�`{�,�fi.�vs� ,� A�} ;„��a _✓;,�z ;1�� "ry...;"'. n�d°u'�' •;�+ �� `�.vr a rr"''C<r A �,� �ae �.M:3 .f,ye x *� t .,�-� w as. x•an"h ka �,xA,-x �. �,`9"�J.''.� � �t:7"n �e'. `}r��.,r,"4�-'r��g �.;� ��^�'�'� � '�sr3``'..� 'w,�'��"k'�s�._..,.N„-<t,.✓'::-�'�v..x1'_ x�3�a�� r �f +� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To ALICIA WENTWORTH From WILLIS MEVIS City Clerk Assistant City Attorney Subject Westminster Annexation Date August 27, 1973 I have prepared a draft resolution of the City Council to transfer certain territory located in the City of Huntington Beach to the City of Westminster and consent- ing to the transfer of certain territory in the City of . Westminster to the City of Huntington Beach. A copy of same is attached. The City Administrator of Westminster has asked for a copy and I will therefore send a copy to him. I am also enclosing a procedural checklist for annexation pursuant to Government Code Section 3527.0, under which we are proceeding. This checklist was produced after great effort and expense. As set forth in the checklist, the first step is to secure Local Agency Formation Com- mission consent, which requires a legal description and map. Thereafter, the resolution is to be adopted. You will note that my proposed resolution does not have the legal descriptions attached at this time . When the Local Agency Formation Commission has approved, please advise and we will continue with this matter. W7ta� M A me`nt c: Floyd elsito Executive Assistant ORANGE COUNTY p V ®� ADMINISTRATION 13UILDING ® / P. O. BOX 687 •! SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 t , TELEPHONE: 834-2239 AREA CODE-714 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION May 111 1973 CHAIRMAN ' CLIFTON C. MILLER MAYOR David R. Rowlands, City Administrator CITY OF TUSTIN City of .Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 VICE-CHAIRMAN Huntington Beach, California RALPH A. DIEDRICH SUPERVISOR THIRD DISTRICT Subject: Proper maps and legal descriptions on annexation I ' proposals ROBERT W. BATTIN SUPERVISOR Dear Mr. Rowlands: FIRST DISTRICT IIt has' recently been brought to my attention that many of STAN NORTHRUP the maps and legal, descriptions submitted with annexation REPRESENTATIVE OF proposals have been carelessly prepared. Much time is GENERAL PUBLIC being spent by this .office and the Boundary Section of the Surveyor' s office to get the proponents to make the LOUIS R. REINHARDT necessary corrections. COUNCILMAN CITY OF FULLERTON .The State Board of Equalization recently notified all govern-- } I mental agencies of their filing and processing fees, accompan ALTERNATE ied by a list of the requirements on descriptions and maps. DAVIDL. BAKER Attached for your information is the listing of the items that SUPERVISOR are required on descriptions and maps. I believe if you were SECOND DISTRICT to follow, their requirements for future, annexation proposals submitted to the Local Agency Formation Commission, it would ALTERNATE reduce the time now being spent on getting correct maps and REE SURNAP legal descriptions. REPRESENTATIVE OF ' GENERAL PUBLIC If I_ can be of any assistance or if you have any questions on this matter please give me a call: ALTERNATE ROBERT J. NEVIL Ve truly yours COUNCILMAN. CITY OF LA HABRA RICHARD T..TURNER EXECUTIVE OFFICER Richard T. Turner Executive Officer RTT/ih enc. t. State Board of Equalization SCHEDULE OF FILING AND PROCESSING FEES Section 54902.5, Government Code Fiscal year 1973-74 1 . . GENERAL APPLICATION. The fees set forth in this schedule shall apply to all filings made pursuant to Sections 54900 to 54902 of the Government Code. The provisions and definitions given in Sections 2 and 3 below shall be used to interpret and apply the fees, and serve as guides to insure acceptance of filed documents. Fees shall accompany the filed documents. See Paragraph 3 (h) 2. DESCRJPTIONS AND MAPS. a Every description must be self-sufficient within itself and without .the necessity of reference to any extraneous document. When a description refers to a deed'of record the deed should be used only as a secondary call . (b) When writing a metes and bounds description of a contguous annexation all details of the contiguous portions) of the boundary should be omitted: The points of departure from the existing boundary must be clearly established. (c) A specific parcel description in sectionalized land (e.g. The SWl/4 of Section 22, TIN, RIW) is permissable without a metes and bounds description of the perimeter boundary. (d) A parcel description making reference only to a subdivision or a lot within a subdivision is not acceptable. (e) Every map must clearly indicate all existing streets,`roods and highways within and adjacent to the subject territory together with the current names of these thoroughfares. (f) Every map shall bear a scale and north point. If a reduced.reap.is to be filed., the original map must hove a graphic scale affixed to it before the reduction is mode. (g) The point of beginn'rng'of the legal description must be shown on the map. The boundaries of the subject territory must, be distinctively shown on the map without obliterating any essential. geographic or political features. The use of colored lines to denote the boundaries is recommended. (h) All maps must be professionally drawn or copied . Rough sketches of maps or plats wi I I:not be accepted. (i) The computed or estimated acreage shall be set forth in the legal description or on the map. (j) When applicable, each description and map shall indicate that it has been accepted by the Focal agency formation commission. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH � ? ADMINISTRATIVE COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Dick Harlow From City Administrator Subject PROPERTY EXCHANGES Date April 9, 1973 During the past six months there have been numerous meetings with City Manager Huntley of Westminster concerning the mutual annexations and deannexations of property residing in Westminster and Huntington Beach. The property now located in the City of Westminster which adjoins the Hunting- ton Center should be annexed to the City of Huntington Beach. The property now located at the corner of Heil and Magnolia is scheduled for annexation to the City of Westminster. Please proceed as quickly as possible to prepare the necessary resolutions and other documents, after the necessary discussions with the Legal Department, so that LAFCO will have the opportunity to act on these exchanges of property as quickly as possible. It is my understanding that Mr. Turner has already paid his Park and Recreation fees so that he could get a certificate of occupancy for the apartment complex at Heil and Magnolia. If you have any further questions to ask concerning this matter, kindly check with me. David D. Rowlands City Administrator DDR/;E/1s_. DiFabio ccz J. Wheeler .�1 CITY OF HU NTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ad 7,;2-zo HUNTINGTON BEACH R To H. E. Hartge, City Engineer From Paul C. Jones , City Clerk Subject Westminster/Huntington Beach Date December 10, 1972 Boundary Changes Attached hereto are copies of memo, maps, and legal description (prepared by City of Westminster) covering the parcel of property proposed to be annexed by Huntington Beach from Westminster, and the parcel proposed to be annexed by Westminster from Huntington Beach. Per our conversation of last week, will you have these legal descriptions checked out by your people as to accuracy of same, and advise me as soon as possible whether I can proceed with the preparation of: annexation documents based on these descriptions . We are trying to move as speedily as possible in these boundary changes. Paul C. Jon CMC City Clerk C I c V E WORKS D�V OF puBL� ��C 1119�2 Nu1004�To�'BEA�H CAi-�F• e `� L. A County Land Lo., Inc. 111 EAST THIRD STREET, P. O. BOX 176 SAN DIMAS,CALIFORNIA 91773 GENERAL CONTRACTORS (714) 599-1254 SUBDIVIDERS LAND DEVELOPERS December 4, 1972 City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: Mr. Bill Hartge City Engineer Gentlemen: i Please be advised that we are the owners of the property between: the Huntington Center and the San Diego Freeway in the Cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster. Recognizing the problems that could develop with planning matters, permits etc. with two cities involved in one private project, we would request that the small panel in Westminster be de-annexed and then become a part of Huntington Beach. We will support any move toward that end. Very truly yours, L. A. COUNTY LAND CO., ZNC. U D J."KL N President. c !/GJK/ 10 I s + z t h„ DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS i 0EC 6 1972 HIIPSTINGTCN BEACH, CAIQF. Builders of Palm Homes I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION i HUNTINGTON BEACH To Paul Jones From Maureen Wild i City Clerk Assistant Planner j Subject HUNTINGTON BEACH-WESTMINSTER Date December 6 , 1972 BOUNDARY EXCHANGE I I From a standpoint of maintenance and services , there was some question as to placement of the city boundary down the centerline of streets and the freeway or along one side of the streets and freeway. After discussions with Chief Picard, Fire Department , and Captain Burkenfield, Police Department , both of whom indicated that either alternative was satisfactory, it was decided that the city boundary should be placed down the centerline of streets and the freeway. Maureen Wild Assistant Planner MW:bwo CC: Ray Picard Mike Burkenfield Jim Wheeler I � ' ORANGE COUNTY w- ADMINISTRATION BUILDING O U NTY O F P. O. BOX 687 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 �� TELEPHONE: 834-2239 RANGE AREA CODE 714 o LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION December 1, 1972 40 CHAIRMAN . WILLIAM J. PHILLIPS y p SUPERVISOR {1 THIRD DISTRICT 'S City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 VICE-CHAIRMAN LOUIS R. REIRMA Huntington Beach, California y COUNCILMAN e`1 p CITY OF FULLERTON Attention : David R. Rowlands, City Administrator a r6 ROBERT W. BATTIN Subject: Inf =atio..n to bs submitted. 'on. w,me at-ior? P-L-�O��osal.a SUPERVISOR . FIRST DISTRICT 1sa ti.leYtlen: ' U 3 CLIFTON C. MILLER At recent- meeti�-ngs- Off' the Local k�E'"�.'?" c- Formation MAYOR 41r3F3 0L3ueR F? C73`c i c'd that the persons %'C'pa �1 tile; S CITY OF TUSTIN " s n.y,..'4 i� s' e✓.;�r r.+ .R „:, vTreyt�;v'�iy��`J.X.F''Ly�'�a- 4 oY.y1 tv f q-�•�°.`.7��L��'ai n [c}ilc. ,(�s/�5�3_ySc �y�j��p c,v aL �__E,Ii3 b ay2��9 �!t L..iSSiJiet....r'4 i/�i.rng �.tifoa'*.t^LAa ion gas it a1pp�.ies to he, �+'Ci:c.4R,I�4o 6�v<I..A,.p� :F STAN NORTHRUP considered on : nex_`i-j.ons.> REPRESENTATIVE OF. - .f GENERAL PUBLIC. ?..R ,fie -a= � r '+4 �{ �•�1•Fpil�..•��f)[� `r='�:!.���fi?�w,Tr��U`'. ,+^::�br��.�}%^ ..•.y;� �}.�?:?,.��:r �%?ikq?*�fy`.r•�y�^.TidY�_�.��^,9.���,ly...��. �s�`�� r-;�'I {.:.�1�w��`} a be-O Vet. 6.�w i.+Ci. o F the .J.oca'..+-L�1.a1 of t w� teJ.�.P_i'V�,i.r ..5...�.I � �. .J.83'r,..4j�'i.»d3.�1:f31 when l h,- n.a r„ent to the {idirL!?.+.�,.E.�..'..n:o l.e s �k�`'"!or �,,o t, - ...1>'r.S°L 13 a ALTERNATE _ e.^G..r.# that „1 o a a1 added :^t r"# ,i.,o, +.7 t l e 4 i-., DA VI D L. BAKER d.ut�,r;.Y �r:,�e`:k�t i . .Jl�r�:siu�a�.;�✓.�.. l�'"i.t1 it+U� u.�,.L�.t�. .-.O' the C.�..�a�' t;;::t- ).i,^ LL.t..t.r ry. .a SUPERVISOR 4 SECOND DISTRICT 7 •lng to - ?'1 '1��1" .�"31" -1j"i a ���e�4p ti d Pn e. /S.a"w:•�fG i, _Las 7 vlA Cf...r.L 1.4 .r i J y,.'.. .:F2 r .- ,g i ALTERNATE as I.'.�.'.cb. �..��..�.�.+.a.�.%{SJ.�P..�1.I. �a p.+fi"w^sys_�..9le 10.9 >SZ:.��4mit-.r"�d i'�.s ,s.� e'.�.PP-3.�?4 �,i G'0 REE BURNAP tit? i'.�I"LY1C'•xation and ai )";r`J 'i-ion map 'a added to "v"h e -'anno:au'Lon. REPRESENTATIVE OF GENERAL PUBLIC map' . - Attached ''or �jrSu_r i'ziformat ion a�cl �.�ture use i s �a cagy of �rv��A � ALTERNATE _.... J1,n't-fic.-i4�.'iort of kir.mJos alj. form. If you 1ria e axI7, ga����l�;a7�W.S.S'�.l ROBERT'J. NEVIL on -this }'�tadf cer ray' if I �,°� ' ' �W -you :Y.n any u�ey 9 � 1 ea-s ;' i.2�i�. re COUNCILMAN t.+-.L.� i..A e.9's .3.+ CITY OF LA HABRA we ? a,,j,-,j^.y Ve3ryftifl. 'yours, RICHARD T. TURNER EXECUTIVE OFFICER Richard- T. Tvi-rner RT `/ih C Y f OF Nib 3 91 pi7 U�� f7 �i�r� MARI,�i 1:nos CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE COMMUNICATION HUNTINGTON BEACH To Paul Jones From City. Administrator City. Clerk Subject Annexation Proceedings . -. Date November 30, 1972 Westminster-Huntington Beach. Property.Exchange During the past three months conferences have been held between Westminster city. officials and Huntington Beach city officials regarding annexation of a triangular section of land near the Huntington Center, now located in West- minster, to the City of Huntington Beach. Conversly, there is a tract ,of land located in Huntington Beach at the corner- of Magnolia and Heil which should really be a part of the City. of Westminster. The two cities have agreed with this exchange and I would appreciate your immediately taking whatever procedural steps are necessary to prepare the. necessary . papers for the review by LAFCO. I have discussed this matter with Mr . Robert Huntley, City. Manager of Westminster, ,and he would like us to take initiative in getting the matter before LAFCO with the appropriate legal descriptions . You will note that copies .of this memorandum have been sent to Don Bonfa, .Ken. Reynolds and Jim. Wheeler. Both Ken. Reynolds and Jim Wheeler are Ithoroughly familiar with the details of this property exchange and I know that Mr. Bonfa can assist you if required. If you have any further questions to ask concerning this matter, kindly check faith. me. David D. Rowlands City Administrator DDR/bjs cc: . Don Bonfa Ken. Reynolds Jim. Wheeler. ' r 4 of CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE. WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 V4 CODE 893-4511 November 15, 1972 j Mr. David D. Rowlands City Administrator City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Rowlands : Subject: Proposed Boundary. Exchange The City Council , at its regular meeting on November 14 , 1972, approved in principle the proposed boundary exchange between the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster. However, the Council requested that the plans of the development at Heil and Magnolia Streets be submitted to the City Council in order that the Council may determine whether this development would be compatible with the surrounding property in the City of Westminster. The Council would like you to submit these plans as soon as possible . Sincerely yours , CITY OF WESTMINSTER Kat arine C. Harper City Clerk KCH:o NO J s Mrstmtnaln of CIVIC CENTER' 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 714 CODE 893-4511 V September 28, 1972 fflltrr,ff�, ' J �fi'�' a rr, n Mr. David D. Rowlands �r�A� - 'stlfi City Administrator City of Huntington Beach 29 fit, 149 P. v. Box 190 S Huntington Beach, California 92648 near Mr. Rowlands: Subject: Proposed Change of Boundaries The City Council, at its regular meeting of September 26, 1972, again considered your proposal for change of bound- aries of an uninhabited territory.. After considerable discussion, the City Council tabled this proposal until such time as the City of Huntington Beach has officially filed plans can the proposed construc- tion behind the Huntington Beach Center, which they can transmit to the City of Westminster for review. DSincerely yours, CITY OF W STMKINSTER Katharine C. Harper City Clerk KCHso cc Kenneth Reynolds Planning Director City of Huntington Beach cc: Paul Jones, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach cc: Planning Department I i LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FILING AND HEARING SCHEDULE January through December, 1971 FILING DATE HEARING DATE January 1 January 27 January 15 February 10 January 29 February 24 February 12 March 10 February 26 March 24 March 19 April 14 April 2 April 28 April 16 May 12 April 30 May 26 May 14 June 9 May 28 June 23 June 18 July 14 July 2 July 28 July 16 August 11 July 30 August 25 August 13 September 8 August 27 Scptem;ber 22 September 17 October 13 October 1 October 27 October 15 November 10 October 29 November 24 November' 12 December 8 November 26 December 22 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS 8929 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90211 TELEPHONE (213) 657-4030 January"11, 1971 Mr. Paul C. Jones City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P. O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Re: SW Corner of Heil Ave. & Magnolia St. Dear Mr. Jones: We are in receipt of your letter of January 4, 1971, with reference to subject acreage. We understand that the density and parking requirements, both covered and un- covered, are more favorable in Huntington Beach than Westminster. We do not desire making any prezoning application to the City of Westminster since we do not contemplate consenting to a transfer of our subject parcel out of Huntington Beach at this time. Very truly yours, BROSS BROTHERS -B. B-: Bross BBB:gk cc: Mr, Robert Hughes Planning Director City of Westminster Mr. Thomas E. Shelton Alpine Civil Engineers, Inc. 17612 Beach Boulevard Huntington Beach, Calif, 92647 ` CITY -OF WESTMINSTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE 14ovember 27, 1970 I City of Huntington Beach City Full 5?0 Pecan huntington beach, California 92698 Attention: Paul .Tones, City Clerk Gentlemen: Subject: Change of Boundarie- The City Council, at its regular wUs:tinq of i4oveitJL er 24, 1970, approves: a recommendation f-ror-, the Planning Commissicri for exchange of territory as proposed by tho City of Huntington Eeacil. Your proposal consists of an exchange of 3. 5 acres of land in the City of t estminst`r 16cated L; hind ( the Huntington Shoppixiq Center for 3. 5 acres of. .lend ( located in the City cf huntington _•�2.ac`i at: t}:o ,,outh;aest corner of Heil Avenue and Magnolia Street. We will await advice fror:: you after you have rertiv el:t / approval from the owners of the two parcels of lard. / Sincerely yours , CITY OF 'i41 TMIJSTER Katharine C. harper City Clerk KCH:o cc: Planning llepartment CIVIC CENTER 8200 WE_STMINSTER,AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNI,A 92683 714 CODE 393-4511 September 24 , 1970 Mr. Doyle Miller City Manaqer City of Huntington Bach 520 Pecan Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Miller: Su)Dject: Change of Boundaries Proposal The City Council , at its regular meeting of September 22, received your proposal for exchange of territory. At this time the matter was referred to the Planning Commission for a report. The Planning Commission will consider the matter at its next regular meeting on October 12 , and the Council should receive a report at their meeting of October 27. Sincerely yours , CITY OF WESTMINSTER Katharine C. Harper City Clerk KCH:o cc: Paul Jones, City Clerk J� September 22, 1970 I . TO: City Council SUBJECT: CHANGE OF BOUNDARIES - PROPOSED BY CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH RECOMMENDATION: That the proposed exchange of territory received from the City of Huntington Beach be referred to the Planning Commission for a report to the City Council. DISCUSSION: The City of Huntington Beach has proposed an exchange of territory as outlined on the attached maps. Both parcels are approximately 3.5 acres, and the City of Huntington Beach has requested an exchange, and have indicated a .willingness to bear the engineering and legal costs involved. Respectfully submitted Robe it J. }Huntley City Administrator RJH:jm r :N, , PLANNING ZONING DM 15 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 14-5-1 1 - - NOTE CITY OF ADO►7ED JUNE M mO CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 775 LEGEND i �]uwrw!resK!ns.oeuct o-srew.r HUN'rING'I,ON BEACH .ENDED �� QR .-6-60 790 I-}AI 611 L�.�6wse!CoeWl.C�r.l p3 rRLi 6-20-Y 026 1.27-K 626 --KTMC[�i.l ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA " °" 12-16-6a 13" 1544 AMENDED BY ZONE CASE' ❑L Ii7.132.1$4.147.66 43.60 32. J -,, •OLSA AVE - - J I L + + 1 � c I Ir J m at ; ! � t0 �-- CITY �•� �uNT,N,r�N eE:cw RI WNITKV---.— _._OR� Alt s P RI of �' •!f �EJON wA. RI RI RI y RI !y Kw E_ l 2 ♦vE O it O RI aI C", 0E CJTV ------ R1-- u.N5TER \ } oe -r-R I i M I R I LL '�E > � RI RI - a N.n ww r a-u �- MI { r W •LW[aN Kww C4 W ,1.ar.'fr•-woe' G � U C N N10'ar[a'•-aa7[f m L \r EDWGER � - y PLANNING ZONING DM 27 SECTIONAL DISTRICT MAP 24-5- 1I ..r1 ATE. ADOPTED EERRUART 20,1"1 CITY OF CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE MO ell ' RUE RIDE QRo_No AME'!— pR4:- LEcrr:c,c 3-20-41 e26 1-10-67 1207 f•3-il e1 1 4-1:63 uei q-2-il e70 2-2 10 11-UNTING'TON BEACH : :-� :;6 1-IS-K N6 ] iSl ACOUNTY, CALIFORNIA f-1-62 ORANGE 1 1\ G E -11-66 dose rkrk•]• •• � u,..4.clwc[m..n., -Ie-6R OSB L.- : "u o-s-64 IOeI AMENDED BY ZONE CASE a-, u I N6,K3,114,210,211,217,230.231,M6,431,433,47O,4",505,6e-51 R-3-e3 1132 12-3-K 1212 SUFFIX LEGEND II ib-I,66-63,61-3z.i!-33 1•3-e1 It eO E DINGE R Av E a I R3 ys C2 �Pca m cS i N C 2 ~'4-. � R3 o R3 ` O i TARP AVE C 2 `fI1 ro:a R3 c ar w c z.e.:l 2 - 0 7 I — NUNTxaG' 1Iry� RI J RI RI v RI RI RI u RI 2 RI J RI RI RI ff �S•R13 : R I 4 ~ ~ i U_ D01+wlD CR 7 � f RI RI RI RI RI ,1vor cR RI .o.c. RI —LE -cR $ iRTANT DR RI RI C4 RI RI LAMA DR 1Rml" o LAMeERr 3 DR RI RI Y RI 3 eD Ri RI RI RI op;.n cR .noeoR cR RI «!r RDw a rElwr M RI RI if NO�ARD cR 'Q �« _ J C4 RI RI RI RI RI RI '3 Rlc c c d i l.A1i:ASRA rT DR ARMEIT O� RI s" RIAl m RI RI RI RI DuIER <" I o_ c r c D RI co-2 I RI RI .. �e C R3 n RI ERI c T or MERLE CR •1• W x 94 1 n R3 . a .n«. RI RI «3 a Z < C RI OR. ; RI RI R3 R3 c4 'E 5t "RI u1 C2 m cLucow cR i U. R3 RI -- — - WARNER AVE .r w�w.l..in.l Rural PARCEL C: That portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section .14, Township 5 South, Range 11 West, Rancho Las Bolsas, City of Westminster, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a Map thereof recorded in Book 51, page 13 of Miscel- laneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, described as follows: Beginning at a point of intersection of the West line of the North- east Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 14 with the o centerline of the San Diego Freeway Route 405, as said centerline }" is shown on a Map thereof recorded January 14, 1966 in Book 3 , page 24 of State Highway Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, said point is -also on the boundary line of Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120, dated October 22, 1959, to the City of Westminster, and on the bound- ary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686, dated May 9, 1958, to the City of Huntington Beach; thence South along the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Sec- tion 14, along the boundary line of Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120, dated October 22, 1959, to the City of Westminster, and along the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686, dated May 9, 1958, to the City of Huntington Beach to the Southwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 14, said point being angle point in the boundary line of Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No, 1120, dated October 22, 1959, to the City of West- minster, and an angle point in the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686-, dated May 9, 1958, to the City of Huntington Beach, said point also being a point on the North line of the 150.00 ,foot right-of-way of the Southern California Edison Company as shown on a Map recorded January 14, 196.6 in Book 3, page 23 of State Highway Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California; thence East along the South line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 14, along the North line of the 150.00 foot right- of-way of the Southern California Edison Company as shown on a Map recorded January 14, 1966 in Book 23 , page 23 of State High- way Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, along the boundary line of Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120, dated October 22, 1959, to the City of West- minster, and along the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, , Ordinance No. 686, dated May 9, 1958 to the City of Huntington _Beach to a point of intersection with -the centerline of the San Diego Freeway Route 405 as shown on a Map thereof recorded January 14, 1966 in Book 3 , page 22 of State Highway Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, Califor- nia; thence leaving the boundary line of Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120, dated October 22, 1959 to the City of Westminster, and leaving the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686, dated May 9, 1956 to the City of Huntington Beach, North 490 16' 37" West, along the center- line of the San Diego Freeway Route No. .405 as said centerline is -shown on a Map thereof recorded January 14, 1966 in Book 3 , pages 22 and 23 of State Highway Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California to a point of in- tersection with the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 14, and a point in the bound- ary line of Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120, dated October 22, 1959 to the City of Westminster, and a point in the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686, dated May 9, 1958 to the City of Huntington Beach and the point of beginning. PARCEL D: Those portions of the Southwest Quarter of the South- west Quarter of Section 13 , and the Southeast Quarter of the ` Southeast Quarter of Section 14, all in Township 5 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Las Bolsas, City of Huntington Beach, County of Orange, State of California, as shown on a Map thereof recorded in Book 51, page 13 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, Califor- nia, described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 14 with the centerline of the San Diego Freeway Route 405 as shown on a Map thereof recorded January 14, 1966 in Book 3 , page 22 of State Highway Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, said point being a point on the bound- ary line of Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120, dated October 22, 1959, to the City of Westminster, and a point on the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686, dated May 9, 1958 to the City of Huntington Beach; thence Easterly along the boundary line of Annexation No. 18 , Ordinance No. 1120 , dated October 22, 1959, to the City of Westminster, along the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 666, dated May 9 , 1958, to the City of Huntington Beach, and along the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 14, and along the North line of the Southwest Quarter of the South- west Quarter of said Section 13 to a point of intersection of the North line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 13 , with the East line of the West 102.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 13, said point also being an angle point in the boundary line of Annexation No. 18, Ordinance No. 1120, dated October 22, 1959, to the City of Westminster, an. angle point in the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686, dated May 9, 1958 to the City of Huntington Beach, and a point on the boundary line of Annexation No. 10, Ordinance No. 1089 , dated February 27 , 1959, to the City of Westminster; thence leaving the boundary line of Annexation No. 18, Ordinance Rio. 1120 , dated October 22, 1959, to the City of Westminster, and South along the boundary line of Annexation No. 10, Ordinance No. 1089, dated February 27 , .1959, to the City of Westminster, and along the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686, dated May 9, 1958 to the City of Huntington Beach, and along the East line of the West 102.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 13 to a point of intersection with the centerline of the San Diego Freeway Route 405 as shown on a Map thereof recorded January 14, 1966 in Book 3 , page 22 of State Highway Map Books in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California; thence leaving the boundary line of Annexation No. 10, Ordinance No. 1089, dated February 27, 1959 to the City of Westminster, and leaving the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686, dated May 9, 1958 to the City of Huntington Beach, North 490 161 . 37" West to a. point of intersection with the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 14, said point being on the boundary line of Annexation No. 18 , Ordinance No. 1120, dated October 22, 1959, to the City of Westminster, and also being a point on the boundary line of North No. 3 Annexation, Ordinance No. 686, dated- May 9, 1958 to the City of Huntington Beach, and the point of beginning. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH (hereinafter for convenience referred to as "CITY") and MIDWAY CITY SANITATION DISTRICT (hereinafter for convenience referred to as "DISTRICT); WHEREAS, the owner of approximately 4.5 acres of property on the south- west corner of Magnolia Street and Heil Avenue in City desires to develop said property, and City does not have a sanitary sewer line at that location and District does have a sanitary sewer in Heil Avenue, but District's existing facilities are of insufficient capacity to provide sewage disposal services for said property and in order to provide sewage disposal facilities for said property it is necessary to construct a manhole and discharge sewage from District's existing sewer main into City's sewer main on Heil Avenue at Newland Street until the proposed Orange County Sanitation District's 90" relief main is constructed, and it will be necessary to remove the manhole and to re-establish use of the District's facilities to the Orange County Sanitation District's 90" relief main when such sewer main is con- structed. NOW, THEREFORE, City and District do hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. It is the intent of this agreement that an interim provision be made for sewering the aforementioned 4.5 acres and that upon completion of the County Sanitation relief trunk the presently existing sewer systems will be re-established as nearly as practical. 2. The owner of the property on the southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Heil Avenue, in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by City and District and on file in the Department of Public Works of City and the agreement between City and said owner, will construct at his sole cost and expense,) a drop manhole at the inter- section of Newland Street and Heil Avenue in City and make connection to City's existing 12" sewer line located in Heil Avenue at Newland Street. 3. City and District hereby consent to the construction of said manhole and the connection to City's line as hereinabove set forth. .N. .4w`-` ii"MI(a Ry 4. Within 30 days after the completion of the construction of the County Sanitation District's sewer main on Beach Boulevard or an alternative route, City will at its sole cost and expense, perform the work of closing said manhole and disconnecting the District sever line from said City's main and connecting said sewer line to the Orange County Sanitation District's sewer main and District hereby consents to said disconnection of the sewer line. 5. After completion of the reconnection to District facilities, District will continue to permit usage of its sewer facilities and services for the aforesaid 4.5 acres on the southwest corner of Magnolia Street and Heil Avenue. 6. District shall provide on-site inspection on all construction and provide approval signature on all plans and drawings. 7. The maintenance of any dedicated sewer mains to be constructed in the aforesaid 4.5 acres shall be the responsibility of City. CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ,I By MIDWAY CITY SANITATION DISTRICT By 4t4t,& • • • DOYLE MILLER City of . Huntington Beach ­tit titve -) Officer I BRANDER D. CASTLE • P.O. f90X ?90 CALIFORNIA 92648 Assistant AL1ministrator nOrJ P, soNF A City Attorney LM.4R'iEi.N G. HALL MAYOR Treasurer `Jr "o,I'dcl C. Shit)ley Ps'UL C. .JONE: City Clerk COUNCILMEN T eil i Fi:lr ilf;(j Alum M. Coe'. Nora:;) U'ar'Irlel G i h l:,s JIck ;,E:,.:I, January 4, 1971 Jerry A. Mo!ney George C.. 0.4Crocken . Bross Brothers 8929 Wilshire Blvd. Beverly Hills CA 90211 Attn: Mr. Ben Bross Dear Mr. Bross : I understand that you are aware through Mr. Tom Shelton of Shelton Engineering Company, that the cities of West- minster and Huntington Beach are attempting to exchange some property along the San Diego Freeway in order to es'I�ablish a boundary which would be more beneficial to both cities in the supplying of emergency fire and police services . One of the parcels involved, located at the southwest cor- ner of Heil Avenue and Magnolia Street, which is presently in Huntington Beach, is owned by your firm. In the pro- posed exchange, this parcel would go to Westminster since it is on the north side of the freeway. A parcel which is located on the west side of Beach Boulevard and north of Edinger Avenue, south of the freeway, which is now in West- minster, is owned by the State of California and we foresee no problems in obtaining their consent to the transfer. It is understood by both cities that the consent of the owners of the properties effected must be obtained before the trans- fer can be completed. Mr. Shelton has informed me that he has discussed the matter with you and has recommended that your firm apply for pre- zoning to a commercial zone with the city of Westminster, to be approved prior to any transfer .of your parcel to that city. If such approval is granted, it would permit you to develope the entire parcel commercially; rather than a portion as C-2 and the balance R-3 as specified by Huntington Beach tinder the present zoning. JAMF_'. R. WHEELER EARL.E ROSITA.ILLE OLLIN C CLF_'VEI..AND KE.NNL:IH A. I'iEYNOUD`+ D"V.Ct ,; of Pubh' Vdork; Jolice Cniaf E u.,.... :%n er v'i, (';wri n;ng Director' VINCf..NT' G MOOr0-10USF. FRANK B. ARGUE(-L-C RAYMOND PICARIJ D:­,Ae, H.'irl r>r, WALTF F? W.JOI+NSON NORMAN L. WOIeTHY .';n,eneo D--lo; UPI Lc:1or 4ec rea:ion. & „rF.s 13""'i"I I talked with Mr. Robert Hughes , Planning Director of the City of Westminster, this morning and he informed me that the Plan- ning staff of his city feel that commercial zoning on the en- tire property would be proper zoning for your parcel. He fur- ther informed me that they would institute pre-zoning proceed- ings on the property upon receipt of a letter from your firm indicating that you would consent to the transfer if the com- mercial zoning is allowed. In view of the foregoing, I would request that your firm consent to the transfer of your parcel on the condition that the city of Westminster prezones the property to an acceptable commercial zoning. I can assure you also, that we will withhold any further action on the proposed property exchange until Westminster acts upon such prezoning. If you are in agreement with the proposal , it would be appreciated if you would send me a letter indicating your consent, and also send a letter to the Planning Director in Westminster requesting them to initiate pre-zoning. If there is any additional information you might need, please feel free to contact me and I will endeavor to supply same. Sincerely �z�urs , Paul C. 16nes , City Clerk CITY �� aocoUto ► PAOIN to,eat ,'ot1•1.nn �il Sectional Dist. Map u,r cowrca ORDIRaNCE NO. TAT A,F2•••cam,A,w $k 2 4-5-11 ZsroTs > o� ee jLri LEGEtID S 40.61 $26 1.16-/7 1lt7 1•S•61 t[T0 6•T•tf I.91 i6 10•!'61•, tT }•}'70 If ��Kc[ K I.�cl YCt K[ 2-4-61 8It1,KT HUN�FINGrFON BEACH tlIS•62 1 1 6 o rt lj ♦•-i•6z efe 1•7 •62 too U• c•tiT ., afuK, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA .•It-64 ,os. 1 0•IS•64 lost S•S•66 loot AMENDED BY ZONE CASE: R-T-6. no6 q{.M],N1,lq,ltl,liT,T70.lP,366,QT,433,t7o,tlf,6CJ„6+FS1 •'S-tS :po P/tt-I,t6-tS,6T-3l,/f-SS R-1.66 1!T! SUFFIX LEGEND- 1.1-t7 @to EDINGER - AVE R3 C2a 14. �. c�.A V R3 R3 STARK AVE o' - C2 iot t R3 J RI RI nuns I.G `u u Lois cR o RI RI RI V RI RI `+ RI RI RI J RI RI RI J �RI J RI '�� 4 a II 3 a S 3 Z DOr+.IO CR < r+f ••'•ff U e�sn OR RI Y •�RI c ,RI • i __�.� RI RI juoT cR RI —1. RI of r..1.E cR 11.1-T OR RI RI 1 C4I. RI RI LAu.R DR OR RI RI 11 RI Q 3 1 M i RI RI RI RI DRUADA cR rt.c�sn„ R I fv,s Tot � ar-J TERRT oR RI RI r i Z nG.AR CR -`t j` l >o URGISTER R RI R OR .RVETT OR RI` VZC4 1, J 1. - RI ARVETT t7 RI /1'' Q t a ro RI RI RI RI R o c F. c. o RI ce-i I RI Y1.1 c, •RI • C4 R ^ ' n RI R3 a RI J R CRtC CR W i,• qa R3 < Y aro RI RI •�1 a = RI QC T—AU OR R I -� R3.c. Y •RI• C2 R aasio cR U R3 .� I S RI ,o..' LJ It r.r--� f. s J 1 WARNER AVE 15 - R-Ydt I•M•WTC9,iJ• ®� Sectional District Map_ 1 _JDerttD_�une M•If 60 1 �' }� - f^n`olo Yo ur<w,o ct. F 14_5—11 CITY._000NC IL,ORDIMAMCE MO.77 f "fNqj.Q Q 0 �t , L�, f.6-60 790 a 11•f•61 611tN ,ING ®N BEACH -20-61 GLwwNEa.H•Nw•,Of.tY f+N,W..w.,aK,,.r.wa.f■a..w,u,u.•Mntz,f 026 w■tf■■u tlr[ l+27.61 etf ORANGI: COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 7.f-6t "Tf Q-N•H tlN AMENDED BY ZONE CASE - IN.117.If2.HIS.167,66•41,6f•]2, 5 " •N N `,�.. BOLSA AVE 1 t 2 n 1� O 3 Ir I° C I _ CITY w " 1 i NUNTINGTON BEACH RI >r - YMITNEY NARHAY a E RI °e$I 1 RI RI PE - 2 • E ° O 21 O <y _ K_ • MJ � i, CITY Of wESTMINSTER C�n CITY ----R1 -- u."TER _ °—rR1 � m'Ai R 3 0 ' f w Rj R1 °! ' .. •lK lV(t[W tat M-t-II ' ' MI r I IV N I Y C461 M Pfd fO•t-.o CL o\arr'fr'■-nd i C 4 V mew— \r 90INGER - - AVE n,• • - Mwrwp 1,M HrrwfroK tua MN•M f.r• CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WLSTNIINS-fER, CALIFORNIA 92683 i 714 CODE. 893-4511 i September 24 , 1970 d Mr. Doyle Miller City Manager City of Huntington reach 520 Pecan Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Mr. Miller: Subject: Change of Boundaries Proposal The City Council , at its regular meeting of September 22, received your proposal for exchange of territory. At this time the matter was referred to the Planning Commission for a report. The Planning Commission will consider the matter at its next regular meeting on October 12 , and the Council should receive a report at their meeting of October 27. Sincerely yours, CITY OF WESTMINSTER Katharine C. Harper City Clerk KCH:o cc: Paul Jones , City Clerk r CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 714 CODE 893-4511 November 27, 1970 City of Huntington Beach City Hall 520 Pecan Huntington Beach, California 92648 Attention: Paul Jones, City Clerk Gentlemen: Subject: Change of Boundaries The City Council, at its regular meeting of November 24, 1970, approved a recommendation from the Planning Commission for exchange of territory as proposed by the City of Huntington Beach. Your proposal consists of an exchange of approximately 3. 5 acres of land in the City of Westminster located behind the Huntington Shopping Center for 3. 5 acres of land located in the City of Huntington Beach at the southwest corner of Heil Avenue and Magnolia Street. We will await advice from you after you have received approval from the owners of the two parcels of land. Sincerely yours , CITY OF WESTMINSTER Ka harine�C. Harper City Clerk KCH:o cc: Planning Department �8 (�.t♦ �t rt �jf t♦ fi CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 714 CODE 893-4511 March 24, 1969 Mr. Paul Jones City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Dear Paul: Enclosed are three copies of the completed "Justification of Proposal" for the transfer of territory between our two cities to provide that the common boundary line would be along street center lines. I understand that your Engineering Department is preparing the legal descriptions. When these have been completed, if you will send us a copy, each city can then submit the material to the Local Agency Formation Com- mission for approval. Our City Council is still discussing the other inhabited parcels, and after discussing the matter with Councilmen Green and Kaufman, we decided to proceed immediately on the basis of the center line changes. Sincerely yours, CITY OF WESTMINSTER undey J ......._. 4--Ad� mristratorr�.,. RJH:jm COUNTY OF ORANGE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL In order to facilitate the Commission's review of the factors set forth in Government Code Section 54796 you are required, pursuant to Bylaw No. 31, to complete the following questionnaire to the best of your ability. Along with said questionnaire you are required to submit a reproducible map and legal description as exhibit "A", including a location map. n GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54796 54796. Factors to be considered. Factors to be considered in the review of a proposal shall include but not be limited to: (a) Population, population density; land area and land use; pea capita assessed valuation; topography, natural boundaries, and drain- age basins; proximity to other populated areas; , the likelihood of sig- nificant growth in the area, and in adjacent incorporated and unincor- porated areas, during the next 10 years . (b) Need for organized community services; the present cost an( adequacy of governmental services and controls in the area; probable future needs for such services and controls ; probable effect of the proposed incorporation, formation, annexation, or exclusion and of alternative courses of action on the cost and adequacy of services and controls in the area and adjacent areas. (c) The effect of the proposed action and of alternative actiot on adjacent areas, on mutual social and economic interests and on the local governmental structure of the county. (d) The definiteness and certainty of the boundaries of the tez ritory, the nonconformance of proposed boundaries with lines of as- sessment or ownership, the creation of islands or corridors of unincor- porated territory, and other similar matters affecting the proposed boundaries. (Formerly § 54798, added Stats. 1965, C. 587, P. 1921, §10. Renumbered § 54796 and amended Stats. 1965, c. 2045, p. 4779, § 20.7. ) ,,(,e) Conformity with appropriate city or county general and specific plans. 1 • JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION C0l`'`MSSION FIRST FLOOR - ROOM 101 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 515 NORTH SYC.4I•iO:RE STREET SANTA ANA 9 CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 687 SANTA "A, CALIFORNIA FROM: SUBJECT: JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL TITLE OF PROPOSAL HUNTINGTON CENTER ANNEX TTON NO, 1 A. GENERAL 1. TYPE AND DESIGNATION OF PROPOSAL: An annexation to f 2. STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Government Code Se do 54797 1 coverin ninhabi d annex- ations without notice or hearing, 3. THE REASONS FOR THIS PROPOSAL ARE AS FOLL)IWS: Procerty is within the City of Westminster and will straighten out the City boundary at that point along the San Diego Freeway Huntington Beach will exchange a parcel north of the freeway (Heil and Magnolia), 1. JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL B. PHYSICAL FEATURES 1. LAND AREA: SQUARE MILES 0_006 ; ACRES q _tiAz 2 . STATE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TOPOGRAPHY:' Level -- presently agricu,l irg,_ i r 3. DESCRIBE "NATURAL" BOUNDARIES: (RIVERS, MOUNTAINS, FREEWAYS, ETC.) To the Northeast the San Diggo Freeway 409, 4. DESCRIBE DRAINAGE 'BASINS RIVERS FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL ETC. Dirt drainage 5. DESCRIBE MAJOR HIGHWAY ACCESS TO THE. AR.EA: Built to sepmd=� higbwnv standard connecting to Gatha=d— Str 6. DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND DISTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL FROM ANY AIRPORT IN THE COUNTY: The area is distant + from th r Meadowlark Airport in the City of Huntington Beach, C. POPULATION AND -RELATED MATTERS. 1. POPULATION IN SUBJECT AREA: Zero. 2 . POPULATION DENSITY (I.E. PER SQUARE MILES, PER ACRE.) : . Zero. 2 . JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL 3. NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS:. Zero _ 4. NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS : Zero 5. PROXIMITY TO OTHER POPULATED: AREAS : No residential -gpproxima.te y,MilQto the North„ separated by San Diem Fwy 6. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN POPULATION IN NEXT 10 YEARS : None„ due to commercial zone designation. 7. LIKELIHOOD .OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN ADJACENT AREAS IN NEXT 10 YEARS : - A. IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS : None j B. IN INCORPORATED AREAS : None, since areas are elther al-ready developed residentially or are not zoned for residential. D. ECONOMIC FACTORS 1. ZONING AND RELATED MATTERS : A. DESCRIBE THE EXISTING LAND USE IN THE AREA WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS PROPOSAL. The subject area is vacant Qxaep .for seaStLna agricultural use. 3. JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL B. DETAIL EXISTING ZONING: Entire Gu3pcfi area zoned C2 (Commercial). C. DESCRIBE PROPOSED NEW ZONING OR CHANGES IN ZONING, IF ANY: Most applicable future zoning designation would be C4 (Highway Related Commercial). 2. ASSESSED VALUE IN AREA: A. LAND: None '(State owned) B. IMPROVEMENTS : None (State. owned) C. AMOUNT OF PUBLICLY OWNED LAND IN AREA: _ None (State owned) 3. AMOUNT . OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA: None E. GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES .IN AREA : . (DESCRIBE IN SUCH DETAIL AS IS APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTAL t SERVICES AND CONTROLS IN THE AREA INCLUDING, FOR EXAMPLE, POLICE PROTECTION, . FIRE PROTECTION, HEALTH SERVICES, GARBAGE AND TRASH COLLECTION, LIBRARIES, PARKS AND PLAY- GROUNDS, SEWERS, STREETS, STREET LIGHTING, ETC. ) Existing services are very minimal due to. slight or non-existant needs presently served by City of Westminster. i JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL F. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS : 1. DESCRIBE THOSE GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS WHICH SHOULD BE PROVIDED WHICH ARE NOW NOT PROVIDED OR WHICH k SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN INCREASED AMOUNT IN THE AREA. Police and Fire protection trash collection , addjflanal streeta, street system and public utilities. 2. ESTIMATE PROBABLE FUTURE NEED FOR NEW OR INCREASED GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS IN THE AREA. All of the above services will be incorporate into th,- development of this area, 3 . DESCRIBE HOW YOUR PROPOSAL MEETS THE NEED WHICH YOU HAVE DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS F, 1 and 2 ABOVE. Huntington Beach together with the developer and public utilities companies will provide all services necessary for the new area, 4.. WHAT ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION EXIST FOR MEETING THE NEED DESCRIBED ABOVE? DESCRIBE AND EVALUATE : The only alternative would be for the area to remain in the City of Westminster and for that city to provide for the needs. G. WHAT REVENUE WILL YOUR PROPOSAL REQUIRE FOR THE ACCOMPLISH- MENT OF ITS GOALS AND WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTIVE SOURCES OF SUCH REVENUE? Revenue required will initially be Lhe fee charged by the ri ty for ftttiirp maint-PTIaTir-09 and nnnsi st Of G£'_wpr Tjgi-Pr and drainage fees. The developer will withstand the cost of all utility development, " I JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL H. ESTIMATE TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY THE EFFECT OF THE PROPOSAL ON: 1. COST OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS, Costs of services will have o bp. bQ=e -by the City, Cener_al fund — and the fees until such time as t-aX manipa hegin fin be collected. 2. ADEQUACY OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS. The City is adequately prepared to provide all serviepg necessary 3. MUTUAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS. This property has the potential of becoming an integral part of a regional commercial center (i.e. Huntij2gtgnsRnter) 4. LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTY, Will provide a more Qompact I. IS THERE ANY SERVICE NOW BEING PROVIDED IN THIS ANNEXATION WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE ANNEXING CITY OR DISTRICT? IF SO, DESCRIBE IN DETAIL WHAT STEPS YOU WILL TAKE UPON ANNEXA- TION TO DETACH FROM ANY DISTRICTS WHERE A DUPLICATION OF SERVICE AND TAXATION WOULD BE INVOLVED: _ None i 6. JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL J. THE NAMES OF ALL OTHER AFFECTED COUNTIES, CITIES AND DISTRICTS ARE AS FOLLOWS 1 H B U H S District Coast Community College ni %tr;c Ocean View School District Countt of Orange County Sanitation Dist. i� K. ANY OTHER COMMENT WHICH YOU WISH TO MAKE : The City feels this small parcel of property will benefit the City by straightenjng the boundainz_at the frepwny aucL its potential commerr_ial 1169 - in Pxr- n2;P fOr n narrPl _worth of the frppwnyL- r L. TO BE COMPLETED FOR FORMATION PROPOSALS ONLY 1. SERVICES AND MAJOR PROJECTS TO BE PROVIDED BY PROPOSED AGENCY IN FIRST AND SECOND YEAR OF OPERATION: 3, 2. PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY'S EXISTENCE.- ATTACH PROPOSED BUDGET SHEETS AS EXHIBIT "B" TO PROPOSED REQUEST. 3. ESTIMATED TAX RATE FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY'S EXISTENCE. ATTACH TAX RATE PROPOSALS AS EXHIBIT "C" TO PROPOSED REQUEST. 4. ALTERNATES TO PROVIDING SERVICES OTHER THAN BY INCORPORATION OR FORMATION 7_ , JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL Ik M. SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE OF VALUE TO THE COMMISSION IN REACHING THEIR DECISION ON SEPARATE SHEETS. N. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED CHANGE SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE FOLLOWING (3 MAXIMUM) : NAME David D. Rowlands TELEPHONE 536-5201 City Administrator ADDRESS P.O. Box CITY Huntington Beach NAME Alicia M. Wentworth TELEPHONE 536-5220 City Clerk ADDRESS P.O. Box 190 CITY Huntington Beach NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY R COUNTY OF ORANGE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL In order. to facilitate the Commission's review of the factors set forth in Government Code Section 54796 you are required, pursuant to. Bylaw No. 31, . to complete the following questionnaire to the best of your ability. Along with said questionnaire you are required to submit a reproducible map and legal description as exhibit "A"y including a Location map. Ik GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54796 54796. Factors to be considered. Factors to be considered. in the review .of a proposal shall include but not be limited to: (a) Population, population density; land area and land use; pe capita. assessed valuation; topography, natural boundaries, and drain- age basins; proximity to other populated areas; the likelihood of sig- nificant growth in the area, and in adjacent incorporated and unincor- porated areas, during the next 10 years . (b) Need for organized community services; the present cost an adequacy of governmental services and controls in the area; probable future needs for such services and controls ; probable effect of the proposed incorporation, formation, annexation,. or exclusion and of alternative courses of action on the cost and adequacy of services and controls in the area and adjacent areas. (c) The effect of the proposed action and of alternative actin on adjacent areas, on mutual social and economic interests and on the local governmental structure of the county. (d) The definiteness and certainty of the boundaries of the to ritory, the nonconformance. of proposed boundaries with lines of as-. sessment or ownership, the creation of islands or corridors of unincor- porated territory, and other similar matters affecting the proposed boundaries. (Formerly R 54798, added Stats. 1965, c. 587, P. 1921, 910 Renumbered 54796 and amended Stats. 1965, c. 2045, p. 47791 § '20.7. ) (�) Conformity with appropriate city or county general and specific plans. i STATEME DF THE ACTION OF CITY COUNCIL Council. Chamber, City Hall Huntington Beach, California Tuesday, September 4, 1973 Mayor Matney called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach to order at 7:00 P.M. Councilmen Present: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs , Green, Coen, Duke, Mgtnny Councilmen Absent: None WESTMINSTER ANNE)KATION ^- SUBMISSION OF JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL AUTHORIZED The City Administrator informed Council of his reconnx-.endation that Council authorize the submission of Justification of Proposal to the Local agency Formation Commission to permit an exchange of properties between the City of Huntington Beach and the City of Westminster, as follows : Annexation to the City of Huntington Beach of approximately 3. 7 acres of land ad- jacent to Huntington Center_ -- annexation to the City of Westminster of a 4.4 acre tract of land located at the corner of Magnolia Street and Heil Avenue. On motion by Green, Council authorized the submission to the Local agency Formation Commission of Justification of Proposal relative to the aforementioned annexation of property to the City of Huntington Beach. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs , Green, Coen, Duke, Matney. NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None ��4c'c�:":4ex'-�.�'�.c k�x''c�-�.��t•Ic�:�'e 1:-"cx'-k�'.c9r�:'�'",k4c�-'eYe�'9e'�:��x�'c�'c�Y:Y.'c�'c�e�;:':Ics�c'�':k4cic'9c�'e�'c'.c'x-'t���t-�'-.c:'cx�k"1e�c lei'c�c3c 3e�`c'��';�c'".�'t� on motion by B a rt 1 e t the regular meet ing of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adjourned at 11:00 P .M. to September 1.7, 1973at 5:30 P.M. in the Gothard Street Fire Station. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Green, Coen, Duke, Matney NOES: Councilmen: None ABSENT: Councilmen: None Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City ATTEST: of Huntington Beach, California. Alicia M. Wentworth Jerry A. Matney City Clerk Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) County of Orange ) ss: City of Huntington Beach ) I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of said City at their regular meetip,g held on the %-H day of Spni-pinbey- , 19 73 WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this the 10th day of St'.t2tem,ber , 19 73 j l:+_C i a !i. T e IT'r_ s7C r t h City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, California n BY Dep6 y JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FIFTH FLOOR - ROOM 503 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 515 NORTH SYCAMORE STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA MAILING ADDRESS : P. 0. Box 838 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA FROM: CITY OF WESTMINSTER CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 SUBJECT: JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL TITLE OF PROPOSAL T-TTTNTTNr�TQN REACH - WESTMINSTER ANNEXATION AND DETACHMENT A. GENERAL 1. TYPE AND DESIGNATION OF PROPOSAL: Transfer of Uninhabited Territory from one city to a contiguous city, under Government Code Section 35271 et ;seg. 2. STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS : Government Code 35002, 35271 et seq. 3. THE REASONS FOR THIS PROPOSAL ARE AS FOLLOWS : Indefinite jurisdiction on police and fire matters can be simplified by establishing common city boundaries along street centerlines. 1. . JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL B. PHYSICAL FEATURES 1. LAND AREA: SQUARE MILES 0.016 ; ACRES 11. 6 2. STATE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TOPOGRAPHY: Street right-of-ways only 3. DESCRIBE 01NATURAL" BOUNDARIES: (RIVERS, MOUNTAINS, FREEWAYS, ETC.) . Not applicable 4. DESCRIBE DRAINAGE BASINS, RIVERS, FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL, ETC. Not a pplicable S. DESCRIBE MAJOR HIGHWAY ACCESS TO THE AREA: Not applicable 6. DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND DISTANCE OF THIS PROPOSAL FROM ANY AIRPORT. IN THE COUNTY: 4 Not applicable C. POPULATION AND RELATED MATTERS. 1. POPULATION IN SUBJECT AREA: Uninhabited 2. POPULATION DENSITY (I.E. PER SQUARE MILES, PER ACRE.) : Not applicable 2. JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL 3. NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS : None 4. NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS : None 5. PROXIMITY TO OTHER POPULATED AREAS : Adjacent to residential areas in both Westminster and Huntington Beach. 6. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN POPULATION IN NEXT 10 YEARS : None 7. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN ADJACENT AREAS IN NEXT 10 YEARS : A. IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS : Not applicable B. IN INCORPORATED AREAS : Not applicable D. ECONOMIC FACTORS 1. ZONING AND RELATED MATTERS : A. DESCRIBE THE EXISTING LAND USE IN THE AREA WHICH IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS PROPOSAL. Used for street roadway purposes only. 3. JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL B. DETAIL EXISTING ZONING: N/A C. DESCRIBE PROPOSED NEW ZONING OR CHANGES IN ZONING, IF ANY: N/-A 2. ASSESSED VALUE IN AREA: A. LAND: None B. IMPROVEMENTS : None C. AMOUNT OF PUBLICLY OWNED LAND IN AREA: Entire: proposal represents public use street easements. 3. AMOUNT OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA: Non E. GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES IN AREA : (DESCRIBE IN SUCH DETAIL AS IS APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS IN THE AREA INCLUDING, FOR EXAMPLE, ; POLICE PROTECTION, FIRE PROTECTION, HEALTH SERVICES, GARBAGE AND TRASH COLLECTION, LIBRARIES, PARKS AND PLAY- GROUNDS, SEWERS, STREETS, STREET LIGHTING, ETC. ) Municipal services by the cities of Huntington Beach and Westminster JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL F. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS : 1. DESCRIBE THOSE GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS WHICH SHOULD BE PROVIDED WHICH ARE NOW NOT PROVIDED OR WHICH SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN INCREASED AMOUNT IN THE AREA. N/A 2. ESTIMATE PROBABLE FUTURE NEED FOR NEW OR INCREASED GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS IN THE AREA. NIA, 3 . DESCRIBE HOW YOUR PROPOSAL MEETS THE NEED WHICH YOU HAVE DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS F, 1 and 2 ABOVE. N/A WHAT ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION EXIST FOR MEETING , THE NEED DESCRIBED ABOVE? DESCRIBE AND EVALUATE: N/A G. WHAT REVENUE WILL YOUR PROPOSAL REQUIRE FOR THE ACCOMPLISH- MENT OF ITS GOALS AND WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTIVE SOURCES OF SUCH REVENUE? None Additional 5. JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL H. ESTIMATE TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY THE EFFECT OF THE PROPOSAL ON : 1. COST OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS. N/A 2. ADEQUACY OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS. N/A 3. MUTUAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS. N/A 4. LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTY. N/A I. IS THERE ANY SERVICE NOW BEING PROVIDED IN THIS ANNEXATION WHICH WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE ANNEXING CITY OR DISTRICT? IF SO, DESCRIBE IN DETAIL WHAT STEPS YOU WILL TAKE UPON ANNEXA- TION TO DETACH FROM ANY DISTRICTS WHERE A DUPLICATION OF SERVICE AND TAXATION WOULD BE INVOLVED: Transfer of uninhabited territory (Street rights-of-way) from Westminster to Huntington Beach. Police and Fire service now provided by Westminster would be prov_ ided by Huntington Beach Of course, Mutual Aid and Cooperative Assistance would continue a s in the past. 6. JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL J. THE NAMES OF ALL OTHER AFFECTED COUNTIES, CITIES AND DISTRICTS . ARE AS FOLLOWS : None K. ANY OTHER COMMENT WHICH YOU WISH TO MAKE : None L. TO BE COMPLETED FOR FORMATION PROPOSALS ONLY 1. SERVICES AND MAJOR PROJECTS TO BE PROVIDED BY PROPOSED AGENCY IN FIRST AND SECOND YEAR OF OPERATION: 2. PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY'S EXISTENCE. ATTACH PROPOSED BUDGET SHEETS AS EXHIBIT "B" TO PROPOSED REQUEST. 3. ESTIMATED TAX RATE FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY'S EXISTENCE. ATTACH TAX RATE PROPOSALS AS EXHIBIT "C" TO PROPOSED REQUEST. 4. ALTERNATES TO PROVIDING SERVICES OTHER THAN BY , INCORPORATION OR FORMATION 7. JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL M. SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE OF VALUE TO THE COMMISSION IN REACHING THEIR DECISION ON SEPARATE SHEETS. N. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED CHANGE ' SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE FOLLOWING (3 MAXIMUM) : NAME Paul Tones, City Clerk TELEPHONE 536-6551 520 Pecan, ADDRESS Civic Center CITY Huntington Beach 92648 NAME _Katharine C. Harper, City Cl&TALEPHONE 893-4511 Civic Center ADDRESS 8200 Westminster Avenue CITY Westminster 92683 NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY 8. ' 10.11ty of Mrstminstpr CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 714 CODE 893-4511 March 12, 1969 Mr. Paul Jones City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Subject: Proposed Boundary Changes Dear Paul: The City Council of Westminster has approved the boundary changes in connection with the street centerlines for submission to LAFCO, but not the four suggested parcel changes. The parcel change proposal has been referred back to the Committee. In view of this, as soon as the legal descriptions have been com- pleted, (on the centerline adjustments), we should jointly submit them to LAFCO for approval. Sincerely yours, CITY OF WESTMINSTER Robert J.4,;�nteley (--'. City Administrato RJH:jm CC: Ken Reynolds February 24, 1969 Mr. Robert J. Huntley City Administrator ..City of Westminster 8200 Westminster Avenue Westminster, California 92683 Dear Bob: Subject : Boundary Line Changes sub ' I received your letter regarding s proceedures in this morning's mail. D Our Engineering Department is presently working on maps and legals for the territory involved. It was our understanding that Westminster would do the paper work, including the justification proposal for application by both cities , and that Huntington Beach would prepare the maps and legals for the parcels to be transferred. Mr. Hartge, our City Engineer, was going to contact your Engineering Department this morning to see that there was no misunderstanding on what is to be prepared by whom in the way of maps and legal descriptions . I am enclosing a copy of our Resolution No. 2928, which was passed by the City Council on February 10, 1969, but which required the addition of the maps and legal descriptions to be attached as Exhibits "A" and "B" thereto. I believe this will suffice, when completed, for our consent to the Page #2 - Mr. Robert J. Huntley -�2/24/69 proposed transfer. Things seem to be going along very well in this matter and hopefully we will have our end ready at the time your Council acts on it. Sincerely, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:pa Enclosure D g February 21, 1969 TO: City Council SUBJECT: BOUNDARY LINE CHANGES BETWEEN HUNTINGTON BEACH AND WESTMINSTER RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council by minute order request approval of the Local Agency " Formation Commission for the transfer of territory between the cities as described below. DISCUSSION: In December, the Westminster City Council approved in principle a part of the recommendations of the Joint Boundary Committee. In February, the Huntington Beach City Council approved in principle a part of the recommendations. It is now proposed that: a. Common street boundaries, (except Beach Boulevard) be established , along the ultimate centerline of boundary streets, and b. That four vacant and uninhabited parcels be transferred with Huntington Beach to annex one parcel and Westminster to annex three parcels. It is. proposed that these two matters be sub- mitted to LAFCO separately for the purpose of simplifying the transfers. 1. Adjustment of common street boundaries: It is proposed that Westminster detach and Huntington Beach annex street strips listed below to the ultimate centerline of each street: STREET WIDTH LENGTH Rancho Road 30' 3400' Graham Street 30' 320' Springdale Street 30' 586' Edwards Street 20' 2355' Bolsa Avenue 40' 2620' Goldenwest Street 301 . 2640' McFadden Avenue 20' 3280' Edinger Avenue 30' 1200' Heil Avenue 20° 2335' BOUNDARY LINE CHANGES BETIVEEN 'HUNTINGTON BEACH AND WESTMINSTER Page 2 February 21, 1969 2. Transfer of vacant and uninhabited parcels: It is proposed that Westminster detach and Huntington Beach annex Parcel "C" shown on the attached map to the centerline of the freeway, a lotal area of.5.06 acres. It is proposed that Huntington Beach detach and Westminster annex Parcels "A", "B", and "D" shown on the attached map. Parcel "A" to.existing centerline of McFadden and centerline of freeway, a total area of 3.66 acres. Parcel "B" to property lines only, a total area of .33 acres. Parcel "D" to centerline of freeway, a total area of 2.41 acres. SUMMARY: While other possible exchanges were discussed, there has been substantial agreement on these proposed exchanges, and they appear to be reasonable and fair to both , jurisdictions. Respectfully submitted, 19 /Otert' J., u le �: ----� City Adm istrator PJH:j m O v A n � � D PA V ONT SOUTHERN• •. ..•,.-. :... �..-...,.-.:-.. ....-.•..-.:.-.�- PAC/F/C--.-'. .,.�_•,..:., :..f. ,-.-:.-..-_ RA/iROAO .. try — RIM L en- +mac., .11,11111, HOOVER RUNT/RG EACH I n e m a C ORANGE C�UNTr I ��J N CEDARWOOD AVE < O A � m N L PACIFIC ST E 1 Op z< ¢ as � A 1 OAR b S • f) 2 � m O N I D u N 11 QA NC• SAC N SO4 —_ VAN BUREN a ! 0 n T < O I VAN BUREN Z y D rn 1 MONROE ST MONROE _JT 1 T � r y ' ' ®amp a�lol X If CMSOM 4 NI ST. < < A m m WILSON 57 COUh7Y h ESIM/NSr _ p A F -- _ of 92stminoter CIVIC CENTER 8200 WESTMINSTER AVENUE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 714 CODE 893-4511 February 18, 1969 Mr. Paul Jones City Clerk City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California 92648 Subject: Boundary Line Changes i Dear Paul: As requested attached is a copy of our City Attorney's opinion with respect to the procedure for transfer of territory between cities. I have also attached the report I will present to the City Council on February 25th, recommending the transfer in two parts - (1) the adjustment of street boundaries, and (2) the transfer of vacant parcels. Our City Attorney has indicated that the application to LAFCO can be started by minute order of the City Councils. Of course, legal -descriptions and maps should accompany the application to LAFCO, and both of our Engi- neering Departments are working on the descriptions. Also a justification of the proposal is required as part of the appli- cation to LAFCO and we in Westminster are working on this. After both City Councils have approved by minute order the request for approval of LAFCO, we should get all information together and make a joint submittal. If you have any further questions, please call. Sincerely, CITY OF WESTMINSTER Ro ert J. Huntley City Administrator RJH:jm August 20 , 1968 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR August 20, 1968 FROM: CITY ATTORNEY RE: TRANSFER OF UNINHABITED TERRITORY BETWEEN WESTMINSTER AND HUNTI'NGTON BEACH " In 1967, the legislature provided a simple method for the transfer of territory from one city to a contiguous city in the same county. Following is a summary of that procedure: A. ' APPROVAL OF LAFCO The first step is to obtain approval of the Local Agency Formation Commission. (Govt. Code §35002) B. ' CITIES AFFECTED MAY 'INITI'ATE ACTI'ON 'BY RESOLUTION. Contiguous cities may initiate proceedings by filing with the Board of Supervisors of the County: 1. A resolution of the legislative body of the city in which the territory is situated consenting to the transfer. 2. A resolution of consent to the transfer adopted by the legislative body of the city 'to which it is proposed to transfer .the territory. The resolution shall contain: (a) A description of the territory proposed to be transferred. (b) The name of the city in which the territory is presently included. (c) The name of the city to which it is proposed that the territory will be annexed. (Govt. Code §35271) C. NOTICE OF PROPOSED TRANSFER 'AND"HEARING. The clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall cause notice of the proposed transfer to be published in each of the affected cities pursuant to Section 6061. The notice shall contain a general description of the territory to be transferred, the city in which the territory is -1- t presently situated and the city to which it is proposed to be annexed, and announce the time and place written protests will be heard which shall be not less than forty (40) nor more than sixty (60) days after the date of the first publication. The clerk shall mail a copy of such notice to the legislative body of the city from which territory is proposed to be transferred and to the legislative body of the city to which the territory is proposed to be annexed at least thirty (30) days prior to the date set for hearing. (Govt. Code §35272) D. ' BOARD 'OF SUPERVISORS SHALL' 'GRANT OR 'DENY THE REQUEST. After hearing, the Board of Supervisors shall grant or deny the request by resolution. If the Board grants the request, it shall determine whether all or only a part of the territory shall be transferred. If the Board desires to change the boundaries of the territory to be transferred, it shall first secure the approval of the local agency formation commission pursuant to Section 5799.1 and the cities affected by the proposed transfer. (Govt. Code §35273) E. ' WHO' 'MAY 'PROTEST 'AND DETERMINATION OF VALUE. Any owner of property within the territory may file a written protest against the transfer at any time prior to final adjournment of the hearing. (Govt. Code §35274) If protest is made by private owners of one-half of the value of the territory proposed to be transferred, if privately owned, further proceedings shall not be taken. The value given such property for protest purposes shall be that shown on the last equalized assessment roll unless the property is exempt from taxation. If exempt from taxation, its value shall be determined by the county assessor. If privately owned and publicly owned property are proposed to be transferred in the same proceedings, further proceed- inas shall not be taken if protest is made by public and private owners of one-half of the value of the territory. Determination of -2- A . value of public owned property or privately owned property exempt from taxation by the county assessor, shall be obtained from the assessor by the protestant and submitted to the Board of Supervisors with the written protest. (Govt. Code 935275) F. 'FINDINGS' OF BOARD OF 'SUPERVISORS. By resolution, the Board of Supervisors shall find whether or not a majority protest has been made.' If it does not adopt such a resolution within thirty (30) days after the closing of the hearing, it shall be deemed to have adopted a resolution that a majority protest has been made. If a resolution finding that a majority protest is made is adopted, no further proceedings for the transfer of any of the same territory to the city shall be taken for one year after the date of the adoption of the resolution except upon petition or consent of all property owners of the territory proposed to be transferred. (Govt. Code §35276) G. 'CLERK TO 'FILE AFFIDAVIT OF 'COMPLETION. If the Board of Supervisors grants the request to transfer, the clerk shall enter upon the minutes, certify and transmit to the Secretary of State Land to the legislative bodies of the cities affected, .copies of the resolution approving the transfer. The clerk shall also file the affidavit of completion ..and statement of boundary change required by Section 34080 .and 54900. (Govt. Code §35278) The Board of Supervisors may fix the date the transferred territory is a part of the city in its resolution approving the transfer. If no date is fixed, the territory is a part of the city for all purposes from the date 'of filing by the Secretary of State. -3-