HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnnexations - Sunset Beach Annexation No. 67-1 *A CITY" OF 1- UNTINGT V BEACH
20M MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CON ME BROCKWAY
C;TY CLERK
March 2, 1992
Oranse County Microfilming
1875 S. Santa Cruz St.
Anaheim, CA 92805
(714) 978-6841
Reference: Purchase Order 130044
Please microfilm this .file and include it with the annexation files from Record Box
130 given tro you February 24, 1992 for microfilming.
EXAMPLE:
610.30 ANNEXATIONS - SUNSET BEACH ANNEXATION - GENERAL INFORMATION
If you have any questions, please contact Laura Nelson, (714) 374-1559.
1-
ANNEXATION TINE SCHEDULE '
E. h blish-4 NO c of " Intantion ( +
to Annex
I. F i l! a copy►, of-' apt i ce _' sII !e ► i f
Affidat bf Puilicatiaa with
I +
the' Citr':
. Aeeolutioa ado 1,:b City
Counc 1, a"rov ftfrculation
of- A,., t !
g. pet�ai". is Ci' 3etea ,
S . No otieT -anne3m or in-
co
rp,ora-tio-fte place
I
is Fittf010e= fi ehi�=thf.
city. com it i Clerk'
I. p�tltia� �ia ;. certito S
- { r
- Tea f.r •. � { 1 ; � � 1 t"
. seiar,Nta filed
0174, am
. lok#cf�a�s�r
Y� 1 , filed'
t�rdico :Pv ci t i , •
ti
Cotset tion
i'71
after,' succgii.M -f04 f t
41
- , --him klk_off :_ t► :.
4
•
- sL[
y '
�i .'- .' --`�._. - •:-�._ .:r ice.....: _ .. - _ _ - _. .. _ _ .. .. !, G�� Ay - � y-
.rf
t S
_ - c•.r --�a.ryih9i Pi••a t. ,_. _. ..-.u i _.w....,. w•... _..-t.c. ...✓♦.tii :✓....i=Jw'.Z- •.aav..Lu___ 1r!•..i_. s,__ t ._ -:.i:+ ."_ .. .. .,.:.. -....nr .. .•:i- .. .i ... - - -� - -'' _. -- — `I`_ - - _a i1•
SURPSIDE vOLONY LTD .
REPORT ON ANNEXATION
F'abruary, L967
i I
Maintaining the Surfside Colony as an unincoieporited community is becoming more
difficult. mast and future local developments are forcing the Colony's Directors
to reevaluate its position of desiring to remain an unincorporated county community.
Our purpose in questioning our current status is not to change the Colony's character,
but quite to the contrary, we wish to insure the perpetuation of our present locally
controlled private beach community status.
There is little question but that we mu.;t soon decide which one of our neighboring
i
cities to join; Huntington Beach or Seal Beach. Because of extreme pressure being
brought to bear on us by the City of Huntington Beach, the Board of'Directors felt
i i e a. this whole question of annexation should be evaluated at this time while re still
in a position to choose which city to join or continue to fight to remain unincorpora-
ted. The question of forming a city of Sunset Beach-Surfside was investigated in
great depth, and it appears that we cannot incorporate , mainly because the minimum
land area required for a new city is not available to us. The Colony's Board of
Directors has investigated the mutual benefits which would result from joining an
established city. Huntington Beach, with whom we have no particularly close
Interests or ties, continues to aggressively take action in as attempt to force
Surfside under their control. Thoy purchased our water company in spite of an
order' from the Public Utilities Commission barring them from doing so. This has
been protested In court however, aad it now appears a new crater district/eaa be
formed. They continue to'protest every building variance applied for In surf iids.
over the rote at of our local y fire department�they have established a lire stet{an at
' . Hunt" .
the water eo�mpaar s office, promises on Anderson Street`} i�toet'Hiaeh bas �
never had'a meeting with, or,talked with the Surfside Board of Directors aboidi au^'
mutual problems. They conttaue to us* all the fosces ''eh►er cart,lather to''' ,
Put
Surfside under their control for which we assume are solely their own selfish
Interests and not those of Surfside.
Surfside has, over the years , enjoyed a close association with Seal Beach. Prior
to the NAvy's 1944 condemnation, a significant sure of Surfside lots were located
f
within that city. Even now, the turn around road at the Colony's went and is within
Seal Beach . Our children attend, the two schools, many attend their churches, and
we use the nearby Seal Beach shopping centers . Should the Colony join Seal Beach,
we would be in Mr. Stanley Andarson's First Councilmanic District which includes
the older ocean front Seal Beach district, an area which shares many common
problems with Surfside, like older buildings , beach erosion, Pacific Electric right
of way, and a limited transient population. The future Seal Beach development of
the marina and beach on this southsido of the Navy property will bring their city
services and utilities to the Colony's boundary.
When annexation is mentioned, many think this would r_ffect our private community
statue . This is not true . Seal Beach has another private community within their
city limits , Leisure World. They are used to dealing with and understand the pro-
blems of a private community. Mayor Lloyd E . Gummero of Seal Beach is a
Leisure World resident and is sympathetic to our cause of desiring to maintain a
private con.g-enunity. 1` has been affirmed that should the choose to join Seal Beach,
both parties would want Surfside to continue the functions of the Community Service
and Storm Water Protection Districts . This guarantees the Colony its indirect
Income ,tnd assures Seal Beach that they would not have to pay for periodic beach
fills and maintenance. Any agreement with Seat Beach on annexation must be based
on mutual needs . We feel that the most significant Surfside needs requiring detailed
mutual agreement of c inditions for annexation are: `
1 . Private Community Status
y ue to exist as a pr": ..
The Colon would ccmtin tvatc: besoh con�tnunity. Shoaid ��ie
. 2 '
..•' .,.tiy?", r�^'1� ♦;t.•' _t 1`. 1F lj . ►M M �•"'��,yt►.s++' .. _— ..� "^v�lh. �A.•i.J. _ __ __ _ "�
N `
Colony negotiate a lease for the adjoining Pacific Electric right of way, that
property would be fenced off with the property becoming a leased part of the
private Surfaide community.
2 . Zoning
The present lot sizes are substandard by the county's code definition. All new
construction requires a variance of some type . Hence all building within the
Colony is subject to the whim of the County Planning Commission. We have
been told by the County that they are both unwilling and unable to establish a
special zone within the Colon to eliminate the necessity of requiring variances
P Y Y q 6
for reasonable construction.
Huntington Beach's position on variances and construction are well known. They
II
formally protest all variances within the Colony in their attempt to stop new con-
struction within Surfaide.
Surfaide would develop with Seal Beach, a detailed agreement on a special, but
reasonable R-1 zoning to allow building in a safe manner while realizing maximum
benefit of this very expensive property. This agreement would be along the follow-
ing lines:
A. 2 1/2 feet minimum side yards.
B . Height limitation of 35 feet or three stories which ever is most
restrictive .
C. Rear yards of 3 feet where residential properties abut. No rear yard
requirements on beach abutments .
D. All garages and first living stories of a structure a:e''to be not back
2 1/2 feet from the street line . No set backs required for xnd'and
3rd stories.
E . Automobile garages for two vehicles shall be a minimum, of.19 teat
outside width and 20 feet in length, or`two off street parking spates,
}
3 ��
•
one of which shall be covered for each single family dwelling.
F. Variance for all multiple family dwolling units (standard provisions)
except for 1 and 1/2 off street parking spaces for every dwelling unit.
w
Variance for Post Office, C•2 zoning for service station, restaurant,
and water distribution company and interim zone requiring a conditional
use permit on'the Pacific Electric right of way.
G. The City will assist the Corporation in forming, if it so desires , a
Water District without any City financial assistance .
H. The City will agr:P to the removal of the County fire protection
structural tax. The City will provide police traffic enforcement in
the private streets upon request of the property owners as required by
law. City will agree to assist in securing clear title to the 10 fout
strip as long as there is no cost to the City. The City will contract,
If requested by the Corporation, for the maintenance of private beach
a-rea, street sweeping, painting and repair of privately owned streets
I
at whatever is the City's cost. it is understood that the Storm Water
Protection District, Sanitation District, and Community ;Service
District will continue in existence: and that the streets will remain
private streets and the beach a private beach. The City will provide
life guard service equal to that provided by the County. i
3 . Water
The Colony's ultimate desire is to continue receiving soft water from the
Surfaide Sunset Beach Water Company. The question of possible ownership and
future control ;s now a subject to the execution of an agreement between
Huntington Beach, Sunset Beach, and Surfaide Colony. Should this work out A
t
planned we would continue to receive our good soft well water. Also, continua-
tion of ,the proposed Seal Beach transrnission main to the new Aqurtfc' Park would
1. 'be extended to the Suiiaido Colony boundary to give "back up",service, in case of
well failure.
r•
4. Streets
All present and future streets within the Colony would continue to be constructed
and maintained by Surfaide unless Surfeide �declded to contract for maintenance
from the City for'»vhich they would pay the t�ity a maintenance fee.
5. Sewers
The area would continue to be served byi1the local sanitary district, at least until
such time as either (a) a main trunk line is constructed through the area to the
county sanitation district facilities near Fountain Valley, or (b) a force main
is constructed from the area (including Aquatic Park) to the "v's facilities .
b . Lifeguard Services
Although the beach to the mean high tide line is Colony property, there currently
is a strip between the mean high tide line and the actual water line which is
publicly owned. in addition there exists the City owtited, public beach between
the Navy property and Surfside . The public areas are patrolled by a county
lifeguard during the summer, and this would become a City responsibility if
is
the area is annexed.
7. Fire Protection
Current services are from the county volunteer station in Sunset Beach. Fire
protection from the City would come from the downtown station and the station
on Bay Boulevard. Seal Beach is currently purchasing in excess of $120,000
of fire fighting equipment and beginning a strong program of employing full-
time professional fire fighters .
The City is currently graded as a bA and Surfride Colony is a 9B'. We could
reasonably anticipate a regrading of this area within the forseeabla"future and
more favorable fire iniurance rates if the area annexe, to Seal Beach .
8, Police Prote ctioa
With an estimated population of 400 or lees, and with�privMe stre
ets, the City
would not contemplate any additional polices personnel, but would handle calls
with present farces . This would still be a substantial increase in police service
over present bervices . Currently, one sheriff car serves Sunset Beach -
Surfside , Rossmoor, Midway City, and other areas. With the development of
I
the Aquatic Park, additional police supervision will undoubtedly be necessary
in that area. As the streets are privately owned, the only traffic citation that
can currently be issued is for drunken driving. The City would not be
responsible for traffic enforcement unless Surfside petitioned for such services
to protect us from illegal parking, speeding, and other similar offenses .
9 . Storm Water Dittrict
I ..
The present Surfside Storm Water Protection District would be continued to
handle the periodic beach fills and bulkhead maintenance . Hence this Surfside
problem would not be a tax burden on Seal Beach.
'I
10 . Beach Maintenance
Surfside could contract with the City to clean and maintain all the beach from
waters edge upland to the beach front lots, if it so desires .
�I
it . Clearing Titles
The land bounding both the ocean and upland side of the privately held beach front
lots his held by Surfside Colony Ltd. Unfortunately, the Colony's property title
allows for ingress and egress by any stockholder at any time on these parcels .
I
Our recently completed survey indicates that in some sections the upland street
encroaches on the privately, held lots , the houses in turn are displaced an equal
amount onto the Colony's ocean front strip: Without exception, the stockholders
p 9 property desire to swap equal areas of streetfor equivalent beach area so the titles
would indicate the true location of the lots and houses . The Board of Directors
is empowered to swap land to correct this condition. Unfortunately,, even after
a Superior Court order which gave` its consent and disclaimer for the relief we
sought as the plantiff to remove this cloud on the title, the title insurance i
6
,44
companies will not honor this and issue policies of Title Insurance . As some
properties are held in estates, trusts, or in process of sale, 'it's an Imposhible
i
task to get all stockholders to simultaneously sign for relief from this restric-
tion. The City had promised to help Surfside with this problem, although there
Is no immediate solution at hand .
I
I
12 . Taxes and ireInsurance os .
F C t
We have collected the following information concerning taxes , revenue, and fire
Insurance costa. Assume that all properties to the ocean side of Highway l and
extending from Seal Beach on the North West to the centerline of Anderson Street
to the South East would be annexed to Seal Beach.
A. Revenue to Seal Beach
Preliminary data concerning assessed valuation at this time indicates
a total assessment of approximately $1 ,200, 000 at a tax rate of
$1 . 35/hundred would yield the city $16, 200/year and according to �
Seal Beach state subventions would approximate $5 ,000/year. Other
fees , i.e . , building permits would generally be offset by coats .
B . City Costs
Beach erosion problems are handled by our own district, and would not
be on the general city tax rate . Lifeguard costs: one man, 9 hours
per day, for four months would cost about $3 , 400 for the City. Should
they apply the present field strer0h of the police department per 1 ,b00
population this would be equivalent ,to one,pol ice car spending 1 /3 time
in this area day and nigi.A . They'would allocate a police cost of about
$5, 000. Beach maintenance and clean work would cost the City approxi-;-,
mitely $4,000 per year. It would appear that out-of-pocket costa to
the City therefore, would be approximately $12, 400 .
C . Costs to Surfside Tax
payer
The followingtable showa this estimated
d cost effect on Su"'rfside property
owners of annexation. The City tax rat* 0#`,$1 .35 for Seal Beach or
i
$ 1 . 33 for Huntington Beach would be added to the basic rates which are
lower than Surfside for Seal Beach and higher than Furfolde for
i
Huntington Beach. Annexation to Seal Beach would result in lower
costs to the Colony for beach maintenance , legal fees and fire pro-
tection. Annexation to Huntington Beach would result in lower beach
maintenance costs , lower fire protection costs , and higher legal fees .
The estimated tax rates would be $13.0086 with Huntington Beach,
$11 .4511 with Seal Beach as opposed to $10.9399 for this year in
Surfside . The decreased fire insurance rates occasioned by annexation
would reduce the equivalent rates to $10.9731 with Seal Beach and
$12 .5 306 with Huntington Beach which is $1 .60 higher for Huntington
Beach and about 3- 1 / 3� higher with Seal Beach.
Surfside Taxes - Estimate as Part Estimate as Part
Unincorporated of Seat Beach of Huntington Bch.
Property Taxes
Basic Rate 7. 3,107 7.2763 8 .4038
City Fund Rate -0- 1 . 3500 1 . 3300
Surfside Community 1 .0000 1 .0000 1 .0000
Service District
Surfside Strm W tr 2 .599z 2 .5992 2 .5992
Protection District
Estimated Savings -
Re salt of Annexation
Beach Maintenance - .4600 - .4600
Legal Expenses - .2500 +.2000
Fire Protection - .0644 ' -=.0644
Tax ,Total 10.9399 11 .4511 13.0086
Fire Insurance Rate
Reduction Equivalent( l) � �47_80 47780
Cost Total 10.9399 10.9731 1Z.5306
Not Increase r,l -p- .0333 1 .5907
( 1) Sased on $15 ,000 policies for 177 homes
_... _ :- ... .,�_.::.. t."•.0 M.� rr.�r 'I,.....I....wy.e�,:.tsMN. ✓fa.+.�✓+'... ..�- ..y..�. M�VC.i - _i
For a house assessed at $4,000 this increased rate of .0332 would increase the taxes
by $1 . 32 annually with Beal Beach.
13. Seal Beach Reasons for Considering Annexation
Seal Beach's reasons for considering annexation are the following:
I
The basic reason in their estimation is the potential of the area . If land prices
have not reached $10 per square foot, they feel that they would do so in time .
Thn price of land will demand that Surfside be a high-value residential community.
The costs of services in this type of community are often minimal in comparison
to other areas . The people in the Colony are attempting to improve the area
$nd are undertaking the leasing of the adjacent Southern Pacific right of way for
parking and beautification, solving, to a major extent, one of the more pressing
problems and improving the area.
i
It appears to the City Manager that the annexation need not be an irnmediate cost
to the City; that revenues in general would cover out-of-pocket coats . 1n tiie
long run, the value of the property will cause exceptionally nice housing to take
the place of those dwellings classified as poor or very poor.
The area is adjacent to the Aquatic Park and city services rendered in the park
area could be reasonably extended to the Surfside Colony. The City is probably
the only agency that would be responsive to the Colony's request for soning' coat
patible with its wiAes . The City is also one of the two agencies that can assist
In solving future sewage and possible water needs .
We have tried to present a comprehensive and factuLl analysis of the curre it `
annexation situation. We would like to discuss- this and answer any questions at the
special meeting that has been called.
Surfide Colony;Ltd .
Board:of Directors
K4C.`<Cl'eveIand, Jr : , President ;
Al GiLhousea, `Vice President
lydward 'C. gukla''f D�reC ory/Treasurer
Hil W , Chatincsey',
Joseph L. Kray, Director
li
. q
'l,.i , , r..•.�t'1 t''",: ! ,' " ••:;• ,ti','r;y+ , ., r " . ... �.t�4:.lwsriM,j. tll,Nta'wr,+M..�.� - -..
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
MEMORANDUM
March 29, 1967
TO : City of Huntington Beach
Attention: Paul C. Jones , City Clerk
FROM: Richard T. Turner, Executive Officer
RE : PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OP SEAL BEACH
Annexation 67-1
Pursuant to its Bylaw No, 33, , tha Local Agency Formation
Commission of Orange County requests your report on the
advisability, in terms of the general publicinterest re-
garding the factors named in Government Code Section
54796 as they relate to the special concern of your agency.
Copies of the "Justification of Proposal." , man, 'and descrip-
tion are attached .
This proposal will be set for hearing before this Commission,
May 10, 1967 * end the-rwowftl the rp rnrp.
t�ttre-date . The report should be delivered to the secretary
of the Commission, County Administration Building, 515 North
Sycamore Street, Room 501, Santa Ana .
If you feel the importance of the proposal from the',-point of
view of your agency makes it advisable to continue the hearing
to a later date in order to allow time for further study, ,
)lease furnish an interim report so indicating, but containing
your tentative advice on the proposal .
Richard T. Turner
Executive Ofricer
J
We would appreciate receipt of your report by April 28, 1967„
s
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL }
TO: LOCAL ADEyCY FORMATION COMMISSION
FIFTH FLOOR - ROOM 503
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
515 NORTH SYCAMORE STREET
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
MAILING ADDRESS:
P. 0. BOX 838
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
FROM: City of Seal Beach
California
SUBJECT: JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
TITLE OF PROPOSAL Annexation 67-1
A. GENERAL
1 . TYPE AND DESIGNATION OF PROPOSAL: Annexation of
inhabited territory to the City of Seal Beach.
2. STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS :
Annexation Act of 1913-inhabited territor
_
3. THE REASONS FOR THIS PROPOSAL ARE AS FOLLOWS :
Request by property owners and voters within area
proposed to be annexed.
�1:_; . ;.F✓a't.�ti;rY'^�''[`n'c�cea''1:rs 31�f��1 �}Ai*:4�'•ti'.'[XM•PPrn'snwr► *zs^N+emr�"""""' i;' �'` "�e�' ��i _,.�__
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
B. PHYSICAL FEATURES
1. LAND AREA : SQUARE MILES .07 ACRES 44
2. STAIT GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TOPOGRAPHY:Portion o€„area
south of Pacific Coast Highway is generally flat, beach aroma
adjacent to Pacific Ocean; area north of Pacific Coast
Highway is marsh tidal land.
3. DESCRIBE "NATURAL" BOUNDARIES : (RIVERS , MOUNTAINS ,
FREEWAYS , ETC. )
The proposed annexation is bounded on the south by the
Pacific Ocean. A, porcion of the northern boundary ie
the Pacific Coast Highway,
4. DESCRIBE DRAINAGE BASINS, RIDERS, FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL,
EEC.
The area. north of Pacific Coast Highway is a marsh tidal area
adjacent to a water way connecting Anaheim Landing and the
proposed aquatic',:: ark. The area south of Pacific Coast
Highway drainn generally to the adjacent Pacific Ocean.
5. DESCRIBE MAJOR HIGHWAY ACCESS TO THE AREA:___�____,,,,,,,_„�
Tha proposed annexation is seav dprimarily by the_Pacific
Coast Highway (California #1_).
C. POPULATION AND RELATED MATTERS .
1 . POPULATION IN SUBJECT AREA :
r_:?roximately 375
POPULATION DENSITY ( Y.E. PER SQUARE MILES, PER ACRE. )
The density of the res gntlal area only is appr xi�te_l
46 per acre: the density of the. er,Lire annexation land
er�s a2pr oximately S 5 te acra.
i
2,
a
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
3. NUMBEH OF REGISTERED VOTERS Approximately 107
4 , NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS ;- 176
5. PROXIMITY TO OTHER POPULATED AREAS :Sunset Beach an
unincorporated area of a22Nqximately 1 100 is adjacent to
the eas , por o un ing or. iseach are XZjlcent
to the north east, the City of Seal Beach its adjacent to the
west.
6. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN POPULATION IN
NEXT 10 YEARS :As the area will be zoned R-1 and is of high
density for that zoning classification, it is »cat likely that
there will be any significant increase in population in the i
next 10 years.
7. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN ADJACENT AREAS
IN NEXT 10 YEARS :
A. IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS :Small gradual increases in I
population may take place in the Sunset Beach area depending
up0-future l8 d use van$ as they m be approved by the
6ove NNINCO
B. RPORATED AREAS: The City of Seal Beach
B.
nro ec:tions are for a population of 45,000 by 1985 within
�
present corporate boundaries.
D. ECONOMIC FACTORS
1 . ZONING AND RELATED MATTERS :
A. DESCRIBE THE EXISTING LAND USE IN THE AREA WHICH
13 THE SUBJECT OF THIS PROPOSAL.A22roximately .5 acres are
devoted to commercial uses ; there is approximately 21 acreU of
beach area, much of which is rivately owned; ap roximitel}T 862
acres- is devoted to realdentiitl uses.- the remain 1nLacrea i i
in streets, vacant or undeveloped land.
3.
r,
r
JUSTIFICA`rION OF PROPOSAL
B. DETAIL EXISTING ZONING: The residentidl area is ,
wed -R_,4_, he commercial area is zoned C-2.
C. DESCRIBE PROPOSED NEW ZONING OR CHANGES IN ZONING,
IF ANY%
]•t __is planned that the residentiA7, area will be zoned R-1,
the commercial, area C-2, the railroad right of war placed
in an interim zone, and the remainin beach or tidal property
� �...rw�r +..+r+ r•r �- �
to be unzoned.
2. ASSESSED VALUE IN AREA :
A. LAND: 193 340
' B. IMPROVEMENTS : 1952560.._....
Total ,
C. AMOUNT OF PUBLICLY OWNED LAND IN AREA: 7 acres _
exclusive of beach and streets .
3. AMOUNT OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA: Not in excess
of J12 000.
E. GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES IN AREA : , (DESCRIBE. IN SUCH DETAIL
AS IS APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTAL
SERVICES AND CONTROLS IN THE AREA INCLUDING) FOR. EXAMPLE,
POLICE PROTECTION, FIRE PROTECTION, HEALTH SERVICES,
GARBAGE AND TRASH COL120TION, LIBRARIES; PARKS AND PLAY-
GROUNDS, SEWERS, STREETS, STREET LIGHTING, ETC. )
See attached. a,ge 4a.
i 4•
S. Governmental . Seervicees ' In Area
Police Pr.o tee Lion t County Sheriff supplmented by private
patrol.
Fire Protection: County Fire Department, volunteer station
in Sunset Beach.
Refuse Collection : Sunset Sanitary District provides for
this service.
Streets : Streets within the colony are owned and maintained
as private streets; Pacific Coast Highway is a state highways
Health Service Orange County Health Department.
Library: Orange County Library branch in Seal Beach.
Sewers and Sewa a Treatment: Sunset Sanitary District.
General Government': Orange County.
Surfside` Stornm Water Protection District ; Beach erosion and
maintenance.
i
Surfside ConIInunity Service District : Legal services, entrance
gate, etc.
4a.
' JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
It
F. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS
1. DESCRIBE THOSE ,COVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS WHICH
SHOULD BE PROVIDED WHICN ARE NOW NOT PROVIDED OR WHICH
SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN INCREASED AMOUNT IN THE AREA.
See Eage 5A,and 5B.
a. wi• ++.+. r.r rr� r r
2. ESTIMATE PROBABLE FUTURE NEED FOR NEW OR INCREASED
GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS IN THE AREA.
It is ntLci atod that the proposed 8ervica layalg- camparAb le
to those prov3.ded other areas of the city,_ would be sufficient
in the foreseeable future consirierin the development _of the
area as an R-1 zoned territoi .
3 . DESCRIBE HOW YOUR PROPOSAL MEETS THE NEED WHIC.-H YOU
HAVE DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS F, 1 and 2 ABOVE.
In outlining the needs in Paragraphs F band 2 above. the
proposed method of meeting the needs are also ourlkned,�_____
4. WHAT ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION EXIST FOR MEETING
THE NEED DESCRIBED ABOVE? DESCRIBE AND EVALUATE:
See page 5C.
G. WHAT REVENUE WILL YOUR PROPOSAL REQUIRE FOR THE ACCOMPLISH-
MENT OF ITS COALS AND WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTIVE SOURCES OF
SUCH REVENUE? f
See age 5D.
F. Need for Additional Governmental Services and Controls :
General ,Government: The City of Seal Beach is a chartered
city with a five member City Council elected for four year
overlapping terms by districts and a council.-manager form
of government. The _ 5 member planning commission is appointed
for four year overlapping terms by the City Council. The
City Hall is less than two road males from the proposed
annexation, thereby being considerably more convenient for
residents: of the area in handling of local governmental .,
matters affecting their area. Many of the problems of the
area, particularly in the field of coning, are similar to
those of areas currently in the City and therefore could
receive localized attention.
As the proposed annexation area is immediately adjacent to
the city any development, growth and/or lack of development
will affect, to some extent, the remaining portions of the
city, particularly any developments that will occur within
the city (or the city's sphere of influence) in the south-
easterly area of 1-he city.
It is contended that the representation provided by a city
government would be more rUiponsive to local needs and; that
a combination of city representative and county supervisorial
representation would be beneficial to the area proposed to be
t .
annexed.
Police Protection : Presently police protection is provided {
along beach areas and streets adjacent to` the proposed
annexation. The size of the area and population would not
seemly impose an undue burden on the present police strength.
As most of the beach area is ;private prcperty and restricted
by the layout of the residential area from extensive use by
cihe g-ineral public, it is not anticipated that beach crowds '
�11 present a problem.
37 having a police station within two miles , an adequately
manned department including sufficient patrol strength, the ;
fr. amount of patrol time devoted to the area will undoubtedly
be increased and thereby enable the colony to either dispense
with or reduce the use of private patrol services .
4 t f 1.
Need for Additional Governmental Services and Controls (contld)
Police Protection (coned)
The city will also enforce traffic regulations within the
colony on the private streets , in accordance with the State
Vehicle Code, and thereby offer a partial solution to the
area parking problems .
Fire Protection : The area is currently classified as 9 B
by the Pacific Fire Rating Bureau for insurance purposes .
This is a very undesirable rating and indicates a need for
increased fire protection and fire defense services.
Present services are provided by a volimteer fire fighting
force.
The City of Seal Reach has oti order an aerial' platform
(snorkle) truck and an additional 1,500 gpm pumper,
which together with the city ' s three 1 ,000 gpm pumpers
and other equipment, provides considerable flexibility
in fire fighting apparatus .
The City has initiated a program of staffing fire stations
with full time professional firefighting personnel. It is
anticipated that the company which will be the "first in"
for the proposed annexation area will be staffed with full
time personnel within approximately lh years and will be the
third full time fire fighting company. "Second in" response
would be provided by a company with full time: personnel.
The proposed annexation area is within two miles running
dis::ance of the first response fire company as recommended
by the American Insurance Association (National Board of
Fire Underwriters) for residentail areas.
There is little doubt therefore that the present fire
fighting capabilities will be somewhat improved currently
and that over the succeeding years , the service will improve
substantially.
Park and Recreation : The area' s basic recreation area is the
beach fronz, both private and publically owned. The city would
be responsible for lifeguard service in the publically owned
areas ane would staff the area with personnel during the summer t
and provide roving checks during the winter season. This
follows the basic pattern of current services.
5b*
s
a
F. 4. What alternative courses of action exist for meeting the
need described above; {
1. Alternative : The area proposed to be annexed to
Seal Beach might be annexed to another city.
Evaluation: The proponents have not indicated a desire
or willingness to be annexed to their other, neighboring
city. The proposed annexation area is within the Seal
Beach Elementary School District and the residents of
the area tend to do much of the shopping in Seal Beach.
A portion of the area is bounded on the north by Seal
Beach and annexation to another city could present
boundary difficulties ,
2. Alternative: Incorporation,
Evaluation : Completely insufficient tax base even when
combined with other nearby unincorporated areas.
3. Alternative: Refrain an unincorporated terrtitory.
Evaluation: The proponents contend that governmental
services would be enhanced by a local government with
the representation of a locally elected council. Zoning
problems could receive consideration by an agency faced
with similar problems in adjacent areas. By consolidating
work forces with the city the cost to the Colony for
street and beach maintenance could be reduced. The
residents of the area appear to recognize that there is
a need for municipal type services and desire to have an
opportunity to determine the city of their choice. It is
recognized that in arriving at solutions to sewer treatment
and water service problems, the assistance of a munieipalityls
staff would be helpful even though the financial problems
are handled by the annexation area.
5c.
i
G. What Revenue Will Your Proposal Require For `The Accoaapliihmrat
Of Its Goals And What Are The Prespective Sources Of Such
Revenue;
It is estimated that the city would receive the following
annual revenues :
1. Property Taxes $12, 620
2. Motor Vehicle In Lieu
and Gas Taxes 4 , 170
3 . Sales Tax Soo
4 . Business Licenses 75 ,
Total $17, 290
It is estimated that the city would expend the following
amounts annually:
1. Lifeguard Service $ 3,400
2. Police ,(proration of costs) 5 , 000
3 . Beach Clean Up and
Operational Maintenance 51000
4. General Government 3 000
Total �169050
, I
It is. anticipated that charges for building permits and
similar items would be offset by city expenditures •
Beach erosion coats and problems would continue to be
handled by the Surfside Storm Water Protection District.
5d.
s
I
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
ESTIMATE TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY THE EFFECT OF THE '
PROPOSAL ON:
1. COST OF GOVERNWNTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS SeeeII_temQ__
for outline of major costs of required additional govern-
mental services and controls .
2., ADEQUACY OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS . The
annexation would enable the area to receive additional fire
and police services, which cenn2t. be Urnyidad currently as.
unincorporated territor without ,the creation of expensive
Fnecial service distric s . he a e a U d also ,ree�,t representation at Ehelocal governmental level.
3. MUTUAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS. The proposed
annexation area is within the Seal Beach Elementary School
Districts the area utilizes the couUX brangh j jhr._.aXv, _,j.,tja
City of Seal Beach. Seal Beach also provides the closest
shnen nn anA h»a,i, innn t cpatcocs to the annexap4on,r --
Surfside and the City of Seal Beach are concerned with the
d,e,te..
4. LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTY.
See Page 6A
I . THE NATURE OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR
REORGANIZATION AND THE NAME OR NAMES OF ALL DISTRICTS AND/
OR CITIES FOR WHICH THE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGAN-
IZATION IS PROPOSED AHE AS FOLLOWS :
The County Structural. Fire Protection District is the only
service ovganization and/or special taxing district which
will be eleminated
6
2 ,
H. 4. Local Governmental Structure of the County.
The proposed annexation area is a parr of Superviiorial
District Number 2 and the following special taxing districtst
County Library
County Flood Control
County Harbor District
County Mosquito Abatement District
County Structural Fire Protection
Orange County M.W.D.
M.W.D.
Huntington Beach High School
Seal Beach Elementary School
Orange Coast -Junior College
Sunset Sanitary Aistrict
Surfside Colony Community Service District �
Surfaide Colony Storm Water Protection District
41
6a.
-a
• •I
•
'W JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
I -
J. THE NAMZ9 OF ALL OTHER AMCTBD COUNTI33, CITXZS AND t
DISTRICTS ARE AS FOLLOWS : i
Hone ��i
K. ANY OTHER COMMENT WHICH YOU WISH TO MAKE:
See page 7a.
L. TO BE COMPLETED FOR FORMATION PROPOSALS . ONLY
1. SERVICES AND MAJOR PROJECTS TO BE PROVIDED BY
PROPOSED AUENCY IN FIRST AND SECOND YEAR OF OPERATION :
2 ,PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY
EXISTENCE. . ATTACH PROPOSED BUDGET SHEETS AS EXHIBIT
"B" TO PROPOSED REQUEST.
3. ESTIMA'"ED .TAX RATE FOR FIRST TWO YEARS . OF AGENCY'S
EXISTENCE. .. '.ATTACH TAX RATE PROPOSALS AS EXHIBIT PTO
PROPOSED RTQUE.ST.
4: - ALrjMNATE.S TO PROVIDING SERVICES OTHMR '
'�NAN `BY _
INCORPMATIOti OR FMMATYON
t t:
f
,
y other - Comenit• Which You Wish To lake t
The prbponentr AS residents of Surfaide 'Colony ' desira to
have the area annexed to. the City ' of Seal Beach. The area
may not be of immediate direct economic benefit to., the City
_ And may even,. result in a deficit for a period of however time. -. ,
over, the, long run, as the area develops more modern 'houling '
{ ►hich'" appears to be very likely because of current land prides)
the annexation. of the Surfside "Colony area would resultAn an
advantageous one to the City.
The proponents are willing to provide solutions . to;:many of
their area problems including off-street parking and° clearing
tit' le to property held "in ccraunon,", but may need the ` staff
assistance of a municipality to achieve the solutions. They
are also willing to continue the financial support of correcting
the beach erosion problem and thereby not to impose the problem
on the City in general. In order to up-grade their community
it is their belief, however, that it can be accomplished easier
and faster by working with a municipality.
The colony is also desirous of maintaining its private, walled-in
community. The . City of Seal Beach has had experience with this
type of community within the City (Leisure World - Seal Beach) .
It is requested that the proposed annexation be approved as
submitted.
f
7&. f
i�
_
I
JU3TIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
;i
me SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHICH MAY BE OF .VALUE; Tb
THE ;COMMISSION IN REACHING THEIR DRCISION ON SEPARATE
SHEETS.
x
N. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED CHANGE
SHALL DE DIRECTED TO THE FOLLOWING (3 MAXIMUM) ;
NAME Lee Riener, City Manager TELEPHONE 431 2527
rr_ilrrl�.M �r_� �� rl� •.�� • 1
ADDRESSCity Hall CITY Seal Beach, Calm,, -,QJ4Q
NAME Philip Bettencourt TEummoAE 431 2527
ADDRESS City Hall CITY Seal- $each:. calif, 20740r ,
w .�w•.�r�
NAIL TELEPHONE
•...rr •.w �w Ir•.npr� w rrr�r .
1
ADDIRFS,3 CITY
Wn
•+1
f.
,1, 1
r'I^
.••Y r•�
77,
t
� t :J 7j i � ' j✓
,
1 .; � 1f 't rat � t •{ {,�
S
1
10
.r
TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST i
ATICOM COMPANY
t,:e
-#ON
S. JJ771
{vo
t55;
• r
rr�_ # '
. 4• a, � ;, '.�•. �, � 'fir
t, '
411A COUNtY OFFICE '
M/Ir1 Y1111 + 800 Awe W • �/ •{f • iMl?NM f•`a t'i` ,�
APPLICATION`DATA $ITT
' r
tli
aIwrY OF ORANGE V,
r.
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION .COWISSION j
DD NOa1M` SYCNUE STREET o ROOM �1
,i
SHWA AW CALI FORMA
P►qposals subfect to l.ecal Agency Formation Commission review and,approval cannot
,l be initiated until application is made .to, and accepted for filing" by the Executive
.Officer. Each application must contain substantially the following:
, 1 . Justification of Proposal
�1. Map and Legal (metes b bounds) Description
Professionally drawn blackline map depicting the boundaries of the
proposal , and such information as the title of the proposal , acreage ,
bearings and distances , north arrow, scale , ocint of beginning, location:
map, etc, Map size shall be on 81j" x 14" when possible. A reproducible
Map on sepia, vellum, etc. , is required for anything larger.
Legal Descri.2ti on :
1
Description shall be typed on 8�" x 1111 or %11 x 14" paper so that
xerox copies can be produced from the flame. Identification of
proposal must not conflict with that inscribed on map.
it 3. Applicable fee
4. Initial Study
Purivant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
environmental i acts -st ' an Act of: 1970, .the Initial" Study form is designed to assi
Executive Officer in determining. '1 t apY. �
proposal filed, with the: LAFC:- If an Envtrorxentat relative to`;��a prop !,
y,
s, Dxurn�ent (EIR or: Negative: Declaration) prepared i n connection with
in earlier proJectis appl f cabla1 to the tivity underlying:the
!; proposal ,_ then thatumuen sh 1 be submi tted in 1 itu of the
a
Initial Study form. ,
it J
r,
•JUSTIFICATION 'OF PROPOSAL
COUNTY OF ORANGE
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
r .
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUIhDiNG
515 NORTH SYCAMORE STREET, ROOM 101
SANTA ANA, CALIFORKIA 92701
IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE COMMISSION ' S REVIEW OF THE FACTORS SET FORTH
IN GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 511796 YOU ARE REQUIRED, PURSUANT TO BYLAW `NO ,
*►1, TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY1
r'
. r
a
y
■
1
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
T i TLC OF PRO1�0SAL
:3
`.. '......_M�Yr��..��.w.��_�._...r ���w_.�.w..wr�r.a�.w.�M�M+I�+�.+.w.Mwr� w w.�Y��f.wy�N�.�rr•�..Yrr...�W .. :.
'APPLICANT
NAME
A D UR E S 5 ZIP CO D E
TELEPHONE NUMBER : AREA CODE
A. GENERAL
1 TYPE AND DESIGNATION OF PROPOSAL :
Z, STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS :
� REASONS FOR THE PROPOSAL : CBE SPECIFIC)
�IIL
!
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
t
At, NUMIA-ER OF DWELLING UNITS
..ter.._ �.-.--.......,.+........r........»... � �...��r....,�.,.... '''
56 PROXIMITY TO 'OTHER POPULATED AREAS:
.tf
6o LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN POPULATION IN THE NEXT 10-
YEMS _ .._
wM•...ww�wra•�y�.r.�•• • . ..rr.��..M�.•s�� •Nrr.�.rr.� w••r�•r r. �.�ww.yr�+�.r�M ����
T . LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN ADJACENT AREAS IN THE NEXT -
10 YEARS
As IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS :
Ba IN INCORPORATED AREAS :
I:
Do` ECONOMIC FACTORS
I.. PLANNING, ZONI PIG AND RELATED 14ATTERS
R'. At DESCRIBE THE EXISTING LAND USE IN THE AREA WHICH IS THE SUBJECT
OF THE PROPOSAL.: (BE SPECIFIC)
kt
to ;DETAIL EXISTING ZONING : ,..
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL -
I AtiSESSED 'VALUATION IN AREA
A , LAND
go IMPROVEMENTS : ...� �.._._
C AMOUNT OF PUBLICLY OWNED LAND IN THE AREA ;
AMOUNT OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA:
E , GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES IN AREA , (DESCRIBE IN SUCH DETAIL AS IS , APPRO—
PR I ATE TO THE AREA THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES APIs `CONTROLS IN
THE AREA INCLUDING, FOR EXAMPLE, POLICE PROTECTION, FIRE PROTECTION;
HEALTH SERVICES, GARBAGE & TRASH COLLECTION, I_IBRARIES, - PARKS $ RECRE^ 4
ATION SERVICES, SEWERS, STREET MAINTENANCE, STREET LIGHTING, ETCl )
• rti ,
t'
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
3 ASSESSEI) VALUATION IN AREA
As LAND:
Be IMPROVEMENTS
co AMOUNT OF PUBLICLY OWNED LAND IN THE AREA: ._._
1
1 .
i
41 AMOUNT OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA :
M
C - (DESCRIBE E , GOVERN��1ENTAL SERVICES I N AREA. E IN SUCH DETAIL AS IS APPRO C E B
PRIATE TO TILE AREA THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS, IN
THE AREA INCLUDING, FOR EXAMPLE, POLICE PROTECTION, FIRE PROTECTION,
HEALTH SERVICES, PARDAGE 9 TRASH COLLECTION, LIBRARIES, PARKS $ RECRE—
ATION SERVICES, SEWERS, STREET MAINTENANCE, STREET LIGHTING, ETC. )
�.��.._�. ._.._...............�. �-.-..�..-ter+.-���
{fir
. a 1
?fit
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
G . *AIAT 'REVfNUE(S) WILL THE PROPOSAL REQUIRE FOR THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF ITS
GOALS AND WHAT ARE TIME PROSPECTIVE SOURCES OF SUCH REVENUE(s) ?
Y
.•_w._ w_.r M.�•_.•a+wr_ rs-n..f.r.ww.. ..rr..r_...._• i
-
H � ESTIMATE TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY THE EFFECT OF THE PROPOSAL ON :
1� COST of GOVERNMENTAL. SERVICES AND CONTROLS :
2 . ADEQUACY OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS : ..�_
3 . MUTUAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS ;
4 . LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTY :
I S THERE ANY SERVICE NOW BEING PROVIDED IN THIS• . . , . ;,
ANNEXATION 1�IH .ICH'- WILL
RF. °
,
ROVIDED BY THC ANNEXING CITY OR DISTRICT? : IF S0 DESCRIBE
1 N DLTAI L WHAT 'S'TCPS WILL BE TAKEN UPON`ANNEXATI ON TO IaCT � ±• ACN. FROM ANY
DISTRICT(S) WHERE � A DUPLICATION 'OF' 'SERVICE AND TAXATION WOIl07 BE
I VOLVED:
w.
r
JUSTIFICATION 0F', PR0P06AL
Le
'�%^ S.F� A , 1.' f'41��:17j wa•1} . �xY '�' '�; �','. .•�t+.�:.i. / ',e iY 1 j (, .
ell .
e w•r• .t.at ., j.{ }r � . .,.' :' j}, ., �' +t rt .t,fj J t t
' SERV.I CES AND' MAJOR PROJECTS T0? BE"�PROVIDED BY PROPOSED AGENCY.'10
FIR .. :
ST AND SECOND YEAR- OF OPERATION; ..,
,,.fit _,=; a.a,. E 'r }•-'
21 PRO .0SEn BUDGET FOR FIRST TWO] ' 1'!EARs 0
, r wwrwr..w
`a-.ak •Rfh, +"'Y"t ktc tT}'i k `:'. , .. r ,, Ef t„i =Yr i'j." fZQ ' ;..: ...:
P F AGENCY �S� OPERATION`• ATTACH 'r
PROPOSEn�. BUDGET -SHEETS AS EXHIBIT B W S
!� ,'' PROPOSED REQ ESr o : '
EST TAX RATE FOR' FIRST TWO YEARS OF, AGENCY , S , 0PERAT I ON,
1 4 .
O r.
ATTACfi 'TAX .RATE PROPOSALS AS EXHIBIT C,". TO PROPOSED RE4UEs7
44 ALTCii i NAT.VEs TO PROVIDING SERVICES OTHER r'THAN�' BY 'I NCDRPORATION �OR
..
' al
�( FORMATION :
# me SUBMIT ON A SEPARATE SHEET' ADDITIONAL . INFORMATION WHICH "FIAY, BE . OF
f VALUE TO' THE COMMISSION IN REACHING 'A DECISION ON THE P aaPoSIAL
,
' MUCCON DATA 9W f
.. CLAM1WORAh1raE.
L0CAL .,AQE'NtY FO"TIC 'C"ISSI
5L' NMH SYCMM Sly. w6m-J-1fJ1?
SHWA ANAo CAL.I FOMIA 001
;�
' �.X+ at, �� + • «ti ' -� {V� . r • . fih'a t.: otsukoik ` t LalAen Fmt6- w l canrProposals o o o ie p is� t r`♦, '_1.
�
i 1 t l a a e I: be ins ated�'un i ppl i catin� i s made to, and accepted Yor: f.i l i ng: by the Executi�re ,r
Officer. Fonts application n ;st contain substantially the Wlc ring:
-, ��z, i• 1,' 1 1 ,
I Justification of Proposal
i I t
Z. IMap and,1egat (note., a bounds) description
� I t Ark'
Pir�1'�ssionally `drawn black1 i map ;depict'ing `the,iboundarii of,'Ithe.
projaosalsuc " tnfidr matron' as. the ti.t`le 'of 'tiir�Qroposal 14 acrweage,
`' ., r Ma � sire shall be on � `,, x 14" when os$ b�ei�niAng�- locaLior�
bearings and distances north arrow, scale, point..
mep;, etc. if' A: � pR produciWe {�
reap on`-sepia, vel l um, etc, , ' i s re'qui red for anything 'l anger: �(
Le a� 1 Deicr�iation,:
I ,
t6scrip ion sha11 be t " ed on� 8 x 11 o
. ,' Yp ��� �� r 8y," x 14",,paper, so that '
Xerox ;''apses can be produced from the..same `IdentOication of
Vir0pos l must not conflict with that inscribed on map.
3. Applicable fee a ;.
40. Initia�I+ Stud M �
�$' zy ' 1. �rl o a pti',twt ,!, shy gT.dl tUif� re cep
Puri,cant .to� theyprovis ons of, the CaliformW;�,Eh I'ronmental�Quality
A�st of ;1970,~th'e 'Initial Study form�ls':`design�ed :to"ats'1st the
_, . ,
cutive 'Officar in det�erminin9-environmeritsl+ impactsr, i'r;=ar�,i� :
relatyive 'to a proposal ,filed:"wth�",the LAEC If `an,, al ',:-e 'activ, • nvi rgnment
pocumen't EI R, or:,Ne•ati�._ } p,�..p . i �i
�- Y
,; ( g ve iDeclaration re ared 'in ,conne;ction with
Proeasal�rthen�thot�documentashallobehsubmittedy�inndieiying , the .•• �,. ,
P
p , P u of the
1 Initial -Study farm:
r
II s ,. .,r 7 1 (' � �1 �r�:r /� — ! "tY J ,. r ij'r+r i>•+tµ. i�.,1; I ,� -'� II� <11 Sf rt I�ii tr � r •! I '�� /,t! �' q� +�'.:i t/'!%... t :.' �r rf�1 ji t rtt.,"r
, �', l ��`� ,r J••'1/i� 1 ��� 1�7r.. rY.i i' �'• ,�� �f• tI '� � f 1:1`l:�l
� � � 1
I �.� r t , �� r � r 1 rat � �� • �� 'i tl ,/� N ;� '� +` 1���1�1
't ) ,.` � ,t/.,j� 1. It !t",. S , t�• 1• ,r �•, ` I. (1 ;. t ���. • �i. ! 1• '�itli�tt `�'r.ft t3�
' � a� ti ;y' r '1 �� i r � 'il, •r r j 11 ,� (Ir �� ,��
'1, tr 11} i r t 1�• �i� 1.
err i� 1 =� i- �li ,�. err �i�`�f�l ,�, r iS��.,i,'1'.� ��rv:"H•ifi��f'��� ' 1 �1 '� J. 1'�{�a�t�1.�.
�� '•f !i � ,, . ,�,r,l ,, is �<< .. '
�I, 1�Ti f= CAT ION nF fROposk��
it
tip8A
COUNTINGEN'd`14"el- r'4_":fif�Jrl1;�.�
s
CO M RSIO S
't�, o N
M !
� Y o � T
LOC��AGEN, F
R
tt ,
t+:i,• �. . 1 Q ��fX"17R1{�'"'� ��'ir�rtif ��I.+Cr>,N[�r�Y! .
J COUNTY ADMINISTRA"�'iON BUIt.DIHa
�15 NOR7H SYCAMORE 'STREETj ROAM '101 .
SANTA ANA; CALt F aR I IA 92 01
't r ;:'f�: :� ,,+• .• f��.. ,r `r i{r�,�; f� .f.ii t+�,{� »i �
VIEW
E , FACTORS r= 5ET V.FORTH
' 'IN 'ORDER TD FACILITAYE THE COMISSIO� RFV W dr TH
i a 1 i.:.i�, 1��,��, 1� '•,' �' 1 t �a+. 1 � r:`%�', ��i �: #t;... ;f �r It :rQnl: .�w:�; •-���:
{ IN GOVERNMENT ,,
CODE �S�ECTt�Of4 5479 YOU ARE REQUIRED, �PU�25UANT `Tt� HYLAI� ;Ntl ,• �..•
{` �T BEST
'OF YOU �I�1`1
LETS TH '310 To COMP E FOL' LOWING QUEST, ONNNIRE TO HE $ UR AB 1 'CY
t
i
• �y
J
� f
' � " Tli N O SAL
�ju�Tt� 1A a
a
'• t
T IT'LL OF PRO110SAL
r' (�. .r.t.ws....a.��.•�.........��r�.....�..�i�....►.�......_.�...�. '��...w..�r..w�+w�w..r..�+...w.�w�..+a.�wr.r.w rrY�.w. F t{.
APPLICANT T
NAr4E ,
ADURBS T ZIP CODE
..r
TELEPHONE NUMBER : AREA' CODE
r
A. GENERAL t 1
TYPE AND DESIGNATION OF PROPOSAL ;
.., _._......ram._._.... -
2 . STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS ; ,
31 REASONS FOR THE PROPOSAL'.
' {�jE SPEC;I F I c)
r:
•-.r.r+.rrr� •.+.ter..w.�.+.....mow� r _ __ .�r.r.�w..,.,,�. J• "//
• ,.. ,,. .- _ ._. � ..., ...,.,... -• - ....�.w,w+�to4-...•/,H f/ra•o•r.rr _. ... 1��� :,��C ,►IRAf,M
i '. t
j(m0l,F l'CAT I ON` . P0000SAL
'ir eve+•. Y. .1,Jf�b,�/f , e ?.f�r `•'1
B i PAYS I CAL' FEATURES
•
�. LANd Al E,Al 'SQUARE '-MILES ; ACRES
S'TATE'.:GENERAL , DESCRI PT ION 'OF TOPOGRAPHY : ,.S•, ;,`
•r
w
•3 � DESGR I,BE NATURAL FEATURES �WATERCOURSES, R I DGELa! CES, RAV!IIES,
Etc ,
• .++mow
+ t
I� DESCRI'B'E 'MAN'-'MADE FEATURES : (FLOOD CONTROL CHANNELS, F
„ REEwAYS, •
RAILROADS, ETC . )
� DESCft+I BE MAJOR ..
H I dHWAY ACCESS TO THE AREA':
i --
rr DE SCRIBE PROXIMITY OF PROPOSAL. TO ANY AIRPORT AhD/OR FLI G'�TPATH :
C.
OVULATION AND RELATED MATTERS
I
� POPULATION IN SUBJcCT AREA: •
.. Eso PER SQUARE MILES, PER ACRE)� PpPULAt!ON DENSITY �I � ;
36 .jNUMI3L'R bF REGISTERED VOTERS:
ION
•fir _'�. 11 , `a
! t• (!, 1 .. r 5+4 +S, �yt;l rr`! ,) i.•5 •y'�.iy ► ?�'il• ' «'.
'''JUST I F I CAT I trN+ OF PROPdSAL . '
' Y
•
'' 1. •.t.• 5 1. .. 'r 'F A"1 _.- '.. 1 •':.I j 4 .r '. • .' ,NU�MPER� OF DWELLING UN I TS ;
PROXIMITY ' TO OTHER POPULATED AREAS .
6. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT' INCREASE IN POPULATION IN THE NExt 10
y
YEARS : .� _.
14 LIKE LI HOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN ADJACENT AREAS IN THE' NEXT
10� YEARS
IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS :
is
` -B 1 IN INCORPORATED AREAS :
Do ECONOMIC ,,FACTOR
• •
I PLANK I NG; ZONING AND RELATED 14ATTERS
As - IIEvCRIBE THE EXISTING LAND USE IN THE AREA WHICH IS THE SUDJECT
6F THE PROPOSAL: BE SPECIFIC)
IFIC)
T
-. ._.r._wr.,_.�_..�..++.._�_._r.._.r.w_ +.err...._- .w.r..r._f._�.._•.�r+r+. '.. ...
f .
Be DETAIL EXISTING ZONING :
,
,r,
'JUSTIFICATION uF PROPOSAL r
Co DESCRIBE PROPOSED CHANGES IN ZONING OR PNEZONING IF ANY ,
Do I ND I CAYI: LAND f US E DES I GNAT I O D
t
N AS PRESCRIBED BY THE ORANGE
COUNTY GENERAL PLAN
i
t
i
.
Es IF IN A CITY S GENERAL. PLAN, INDICATE ITS LAND USE DES IGNA .Ti�ON '
FOR THE SUBJECT TERRITORY :
Fe INDICATE ADOPTED SPHERE OF INFLUENCE PLANS, bF, ANY LOCAL
AGENCIES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE tO THE PROPOSAL
21 AGR I CULTURAL PRE ` E
SEft VE AND OPEN SPACE FACTORS
A , DOES THE PROPOSAL INVOLVE ANY TERRITORY UNDER AN AGRICULTURAL
I
PRESERVE CONTRACT? IF F SO, STATE THE PARTIES THEREOF
i
i B HAS Er,a N ��rAL OR NOTICE OF CAhCELLATI ON
i I THER No� RE-NC n; ��eTtc of
y
BEEN F=i LED 1-11 TIC THE COUNTY RECORDER 'S OFFICE? IF SO
STATE THE DATE of FILING
C COULD THE PROPOSAL INDUCE, FACILITATE ..ORS LEAD TO THE CONVERSION.
OF EXISTING OPEN SPACE LANDS TO USES OTHER THAN OPEN SPACE USEST
IF S0, PLEASE EXPLAIN :
t ,
JUST I F I CAT O 'O PROPOSAL
1
s• t ,
ASSESSED VALUATION IN AREA
8 IMPROVEMENTS` .�... '
' a
C AMOUNT OF PUBLICLY OWNED ' LAND IN THE AREA : ..
4s AMOUNT OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA ; ..
k ..
GOVERNMENT •.
E AL' SER„ 66 "' ETA k AS , l!l VICES IN AREA . (DESCRIBE I N S1
%5; =`;.- ,r ,,,; ;•. •.:. ., i t .,.7.'�d+tr �Xi SA0
,
•
PRiATE To THE AREA THE EXISTING GOVERN t4ENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS IiN
THE AREA''INCLUDING, FOR EXAMPLE, POLICE PROTECTION;. FIRE PROTECTION;,
HEALTH SERVICES.4 GARBAGE 8 TRASH COLLECTION, LIBRARIES, PARKS 8 RECRE—
ATION SERVICES.,' SEWERS, STREET MAINTENANCE, STREET LIGHTING, ETC,
0
i
y:
14
JUST I F I CAT I OW OF NRGPOSAL'r
t . ,
• 1 11
Jfr J I Lr
.1{,, 1 ; - . U Sri 1`'•' ' `. . ,*ate'Fr I.r�"',7 'fi'"'d -.i ' c�N�r��Sit• 1 r '
�=s NEiI U, r0 :ADnIT IONAL GOVERNMENTAL SERVI is OR'.{CON1'ROf•LS • ft '°I
'f 1 •)1• •7)jf ;�x•,. t. .• •"1� 2t 1 ".f: •1,t k. "'1 1*Xw!'`' r`y �`i�`r '4;4�` ,_. � y9,'� ,•r,S .
l
,L . nt�scitj lst: YIiC1SE " -OVERUMENTAL SERVICES OR 'CONTROLS'MI CH SHOU :JD-,'
PROV PROVIDED D W I c
' H { ARE r�0 NOT PROVIDED :OR �•
I'C WoULt1� P
r i .. DE
IN INCREASED AMOUNTS IN THE AREA :
'r
1 � L
i1
1, 21 ESTIMATE PROBABLE FUTURE NEED FOR NEVI OR INCREASED GOVERNMENTAL,
SERVICES OR CONTROLS IN T14E AREA;
1 ,
t
3 , DESCRIBE HOW THE PROPOSAL MEETS THE NEED(S) AS NOTED IN, PARAGRAPHI ;
F1 ANA F2 ADOVE : ;
1 J r
f -- - -
III WHAT^ ALTERNATIVE .COURSES OF ACTION EXIST FOR MEETING THE NEED(S)
NOTED ABOVE? DESCRIBE AND EVALUATE ;
M.•���•!•• •fir .'.
1_r�_. �.w.�w.••rw� �•�rla� .��....".�.�.�Y�..�..�—.aH�... .''�'.�. ...�11�1■ _ • 1 —
•
•
a
JUS7IFICATION'oE `P OPOSAL
rP
A 'S'F.sSEII VALUATION I N AREA
"A. -LAND
Bi IMPROVEMENTS :
..� .�
C AMOUNT OF PUBLICLY OWNED LAND -IN THE AREA $
4. AMOUNT Or SALES TAX COLLECYED IN AREA : _
,
L
1
.1,-`, +,• .. ti°, .';. ', ':, ,+.'pk .�' at,��`7,•� ' ;.- '"+. { '.�" �t ° 7 rr .�. �
E G.SO,IIERNIMENNTAL ' SERVICES. I N AREA" ' CDESCRI BE 'IN; SUCH DETAIL AS "I S APPRO- '
rlyYi ' k;` ,., j'`-ri' ;' .:'- : 't •4i` `. .'1w�.Y.. ' ..',i, F `' fi ."�,tir4Y,.,..;, N.��t1F�T+1r�,�l ,''- j 1
` PR I ATE `TC1 THE • AREA THE- EXISTING GOVERNMENTAL ,SERVICES Ahfl CtNTROLSr I N '
THE AREA �I NCLUD I POLICE PROTECTION, FIRE PROTECTION;
� ' f{G, FOR ' EXAMPLE _
. ASH COLLECTION, LIBR
: � .�., paRKs � a�cRE -
HEALTH SERVICES, GARBAGE � TRASH �ARIES�.
ATION SERVICES, SEWERS, S7REET MAINTENANCE, STREET LIGHTi
I NG ETC';,
,
I
,
w.r+r.�+..r..�.rf..w+r�-•-••�..++.rr.�.�r�— — w..�r•.� .aw.. r�.r.r�
1.
• _.-..., ....w_-.+raw..�w.�.•.rr._ r._�_. y+r—•�.�rrrw�..�••r�� �.w�...•..�r .. 'f
3
4
N MUST t f` I CAT 1 O DF PROPOSAL
r
9,•.!..1. 't _ ytr> �. �-t:: ,�It�?�f�}iF{ I • ",lr��Y'^t ';�,r"'�..Yti:Yt�,. ,'.« i:1�z��1�"i: •1: 1/ ,.��
`p L�� `f ] 4 '
NEE U FOR aU11 t T i dNAL Gc)VERNMEMTA.L SERV I CES bR .C�t ? OLS r
,.;. i• 1'[♦ .'��. i.��lY .i�Y:?T.Qa I� -.�`'•:".�Y� :rx'�. .EL°DL' +j':Y �y;M. �:%ti7 �1 1'l":� 1. '.i7+
.i. , nl c�Riul3r 1100E roVir%UMENfa iERVICES alp CONTROLS wHt H sHau�. aE
PROV I tili D Wri I CN 'ARE NOW NOl" PRdV I DED• ail WH I C�i SHOULD BE Pildv t l' d
I' IN "l NCRt:l1SED"AMOUNTS IN THE AREAS
1
21 ESTIMATE PROBABLE I'IITURE NCEn rOR ' NEW OR INCREASED GOVERNMENTAL
4 SERVICES OR CONTROLS I N THE AREA :
1 }
I 39 DESCRIBE HOW TkE PROPOSAL MEETS THE NEED(S) AS NOTED IN PARAGRAPHS
F1 AND FZ ABOVE :
i
'
. .�.w w..»�.....+.rrw...�.mow.+..•.,.. -w+ �.r� -��rr.+..,--...+�. �.�...+��wr.+. .n*.�+-.�..•. :.1'
14 *I,IAT ALTERNATIVE COURSES `OF ACTION"EXIST FOR MEETING THE NEEb(SY '
Nam ABOVE? DESCRIBE AND EVALUATE : "
it
i
I• q
I' 'OM.� �•.w.l�. .wu•M.�•��- - ram.. .��� C
..I .,�.�•w.•+r.�...w Mw•���..+.,wr +. ._..�...r..rrwrw.w�w�.�..�r....�r...w•��ter. _ { -
r .
'
,
I ,
E'OSAL
. _•, Jt1Sfi 1 i A'��t!N PR
j
•A `, r • + '
F. d
E MHAT` REVENUE W1 LL, THE:-`PROPOSAL REQUIRE' FOR
HE ACOMPLi w
S NTS OF" I T$
GOALS D WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTIVE SOURCES ' OF SUCH REVENUE�S�?
J,
H, ESTIMATE TO THE BEST ,OF, YOUR ABILITY, THE UPECT 'OF THE PROPOSAL ON:
1r, COST OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS';
{ . -'ADEQUACY OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES N CONTROLS :
MUTUAL_ SOC I AL AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS :
,
Al_ GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE COUNT UCTURE OF THE
y � . LAC COUNTY : __._�_._...._........,�...�._._
r
, ,•;.. .'. � : a . : +,.• ,v, e',"lr' _.' i:� '_; + . ` . tA+b:. +Lr'+iti'" �s
I I S T HERE `ANY SERVICE NOW BE I NG PROV I DED I N .TH I S ANNEXATION WH I CH` WILL
SE" PROVIDED' BY THE ANNEXING- CITY OR DISTRICT? I S0, OE R SC F
IN DETAIL WHAT STEPS WIL ;ANNEXATICN _TO DETACH FROM ANY
L ICE TAKEN UPON"ANNEXATION `
DISTRICTCS� WHERE "A DUPLICATION -OF�� ��� N OF SERVICE •AND TAXATION fiE •�'
INVOLVED• _�w.__.... _.._._._.. �._.__.�..w.�.._.w....____.
. w.wwar...+�..+i_—-- _—.��+.wwrr..awrrr w�r._.w•
•
'y71•royw... ....,.. .,.__....�......,-r ..w..,.• ,.�......,....._.«_•. .......«.-. ..... ;•v'1ri7ditl:.vn.vr +.+..-. �y .. .,,
JUST F I CAPTION OF,'PROPOSAL ,
- o THE NAMES OF ALL COUNTIES,, CITIES AND DISTRICTS AF'FECTPROPOEI� 11Y ,.TNE.,
l i {;
R`
i
7
USE SPACE BELOW FOR ANY yOTHER COMMENT YOU WISH TO MAKE
1 ,
f
`
1
1. u, �Y , 'J;LS X+F,; .Tf fi3fX :l,'r.C��fM.+1±.r+r�•-:- . .,.. ..r. .: _'�_
r y
it
JUST i P I CAT ION" OF PROPOSAI.
Ll
Y4�1�E4� F F.S1R ►TJ. L $s�PQ�. 4JY "
SERVICES AND MAJOR PROJECTS 0 BE PROVIDEDE ,l
1
t
8Y PkOPOScQ- AGENCY � N .,.
FIRST ANU' SECOND YEAR OF OPERATION :
rf
..._.� .� .... .. i 4t
rt.
..wry
S D r ET FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY ' S .'OPER&I ON :' ATTACH
2 PROPOSED BUDGET
PROP 41:; BURG A .,r �.
ET SHEETS' AS EXHIBIT Tt'i PROf�OSED QUEST
t
. RE
3 ESTIMATED" .�, ,, � �. �. 1 ,r��'�r��. �• _.
TAX RATE FOR FIRST TWO. YEARS 'OF ;AGENCY, S OPERATION
CH TAX RATE PROPOSALS AS EXH IB I/T �C TO PROPOSED- RE
ATTA " o� o
t 4UEST
� ALTERNATIVES TO PROVIDING SERVICES OTHER THAN BY INCORPORATION OR -
FORMATION :
r
me
i .
t
;UDAIT ON 'A SEPARATE SHEET ADDITIONAL
. � . . .:. , N I CN FLAY .8E OF
INFORMATION W
VALUE TO THE COMMICSION IN REACH;NO A DECISION ON THE PROPOSAL
z ,
�E .
l! '+ J
� y `" JI ,
f: JUSTIFICATION CIF. PROF OSAL
N i, 11si �T�1E NAt�1� � i1DDRESB n . , .�� i. . ���' a,,,,tf L-� 1 . , ., •+';�`i; ..,�f,, a, ;,• �'s i �
' of ,� j ; ANDS TELEPHONE W)NbER OF EACH PERSON ;C M IXtMUM�'rI'
.�Y01) wI SH NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING ' THE` PROPOSAL T6 4E, SENT':,/'
ADDRESS ZIP Ct?ac"
T;ELEPHONE NUMBER : AREA CODE
INAME
ADDRESS : ZIP CODE
' TELEPHONE NUMBER : AREA CODE C )
NAME
ADDRESS : ,. -- zip CODE ,.,'
TELEPHONE NUMBER : AREA CODE t.
�L�';71�t e4;1 5 `lk Cry. f�f,����1►'•itV1+fNwrbir•..... .•.., v . .n. ... -v..«w+- ai. .,. -.. »..- ....,ao.ry�,r�, :Y:;1►}".1.7f ►'zn '"'...••.. .. -+��iYV1.:. _,.Y:�:�r...e ....�
1,
I.
r
y
I N I�'C I AL ST 1.1DY
'i COUNTY DF ORANGE
1
LOCAL IIGCNCY �'G12t9A-r,I om Comm
P, 0' Box '687
SANTA ANA, CAL I I'CRN IA 9270#2
T H I S INI T I AL STUDY IS A U.RAf_L AND HAS NO 'OFFICIAL STATLIS UNLESS
(REVIEW^ED AND FINALIZED BY AN AUTHORIZED LAFCO' STAFF OFFICIAL. LAFCO ,{
' 1'RESEgVCS THE RIGHT TO EDIT THE DRAFT AS NECESSARY
t�♦ �MRED
. as .�'�qi iTIAL STUYIS .REob'~COM L1ArICE. 1
AN.I4 rWITFI;TILE; C LI i•ORiI[A; ENVIRa �IENT/1 �Q ALI;TY
ANb*,'A TED�,,t�PD Br,:;THE 1OCAI AGEKCY, F'oi MATILOI
`ACTaF190, NOTALLPRO�JECTSREVIEWEO , �' ',
C4 ISShION WI, t. t QUIJiE T-IE,�PREPARAT., 0H OFE '�t!° r�y,IROi�MEI�T11t� t�,1P.1CT,EiE1'ORT,! LN 6i ftk TA
DETERMINE . EERh,OR.,N01' P. OJECT .WI.LL� }I�+IE,,A 5IGNIFIC/,�NT .EFFECTON. TFEE It0�1MFN1'.
�+ �� `}
t r c jr 8
THI: OlL01�tI1.G INITIAL; FIL ,
II' EXECUTIVES OFFICE THE EX�CUTIVE'`OFFICER`11ILL'""+ ;F.DYO` IELAFCb {
STUD DUST. �E EU:'.oUT I N DETA11, AND_ SU9t ITT
i..
P OJ CT�I6AS O ON THE -INFORMATION- PROVIDED Af10-OTt(ERTTACTORS , 11) WILL'h"DETE '' tikE' HE
r
:, C 1 t
R
.' OR `NOT ,THE PROJECT;, WILt:rREQUIREt-AN EIR AND `1tILl `NOTIFY;;TEIE''PROPONENT �ACCORDItIGLY,� `1IF
AN EIR IS AEQQUIRED', HE PROPOIIENT WILL BE REST'O`ISIBLE°1FOR* PREPARIIIG,AND SLIB?IITTINO"A
.'DRAFT' ' EIR''TO LAFCO. IF AN EIR IS NOT REQUIREUa� A NEGATIVE 'DECLARATION' WILL BE ISSUED,:
FOR THE PROJECT AND FILED WITH THE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.
1. PROJECT TITLE: . -
2. PROJECT LOCATION:
3. ' REASON(S) FOR THE PROJECT (be specific) :
il.�.� Mi• 11 � r♦
4• DOES THE �1.^,., H q Ry'''
E PROJECT INVOLVE PROPOSED (or on e�ng) 'D�VELOPMENT OF TE,,t'RQ�ERTY7
IF SO. DESCRIBE THE TYPE OF DEVELOPI4ENT AND ITS PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS (i .e. ,
purpose, size, number of units , etc. ) :
5. EXISTING' ENVIRONMENT OF THE PROJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA:
5. 1 Topography
i,
r
r �
+ .+',.\. ',•., ,":. / :., ►.•.+_r._..+.....�rwwr_Yr• :.•►r•w•f_N'••I _r:� ..- - .. r _.. ,• Y/� +� ..
F � '
t 3'Weter.Q�r�11ty (si�rf�rce and/or• sti�sur uce) _ ._......_.. _. ...., _:..::_�' ..R
;,.
'
7.
54 Mineral Resources
5.5 Flora I, Fauna (emphisis on rare, endanyered' or u0que species)
S
5, 6 Ambient Noise levels
5.7 Archaeological/Paleontological Resources
,i
5.8 "population
5. 9 Public Services
5. 10 Improvements (be specific )
6. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL f
�ENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT UPON:
6. 1
6.2 Air Quality
6.3 Water QuAl ity _
6.4 Miner;i)' Resources
.....r.,Y._..._.._»_.__._�....-.�«. _..._AI_«��a r.•..__fit wr•...:�..y.�y+._r._N•..�
w..__+rAlr.�l+r....w...�•.rrr.A.__....:._►a.��Y+rw.��..._. �.w.�Ar.w.�ir..+.r............_....�•«.•.r..._..•......�.r r+._r• ....
.r•.rri.+lr-- r_rr 4..«-..... ..w ..r-. �..r.••..fw+•-r► .r.wrr...__.r. .N�«w.r•..._.._..r 1_ ,.r .+w ..... ..... ..... ..r.., �
,
M • /r
Ii
r
+.r....r...wy_w ., _ . w �� y . ,`!I w,.�.i1•+ Iwo rC
+ • ' , +++w w:•.. ..�.i• ••ate. w .w�+fr... .• �.N.. •. 1 r •.l�,t ...J r. J!
•
6:6 *616t, Ndii Level
•. �_r....�.-. �—+..-. .... .. «w.w .._. ,. _ ..•ter.....« ..w�+r..�.�w._�.r�r .r•.r .1.
fW.•w._w.�•r�r••w.�ww••.•w•_w_.r� .••-�•..�..w•. .• .r.w•ww�wrrl'iw •www.wN I�'.w..�••� Ii.
r , ... r.wwrr_' � frrl.r••w YIM f �_
6.7 Archaeologica-l�Paleontological' Resources
6.a Nopu 1 a ti on.
' ; 6.9 Public Seri►ices � � r.•
. I
7. IS THE PRO ..
• . . � to be affected by) HIGH 'NOISE
PROJECT LOCATED IN AN AREA AFFECTED BY (or
LEVELS, SUCH AS AIRPORTS , ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS, RAILROAD TPAFFIC ETC? IF SO,
PLEASE .EXPLAIN:
.---------
B. IS THE PROJECT NEAR ANY LOCALLY OR RFG I ANALLY S I CPI I F I CANT NATURAL OR CULTURAL.
RESOURCE, SUCH AS A WATERCOURSE, HILLSIDE OR THE BEACH? IF SO, PLEASE
EXPLAIN
E
f
rw �
9. IS THE PROJECT IN CONFLICT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL PLANS AND GOALS THAT HAVE BEEN
ADOPTED BY THE COMMUNITY WHERE THE PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED? IF 50
PLEASE EXPLAIN:
��.�. ,mow... w�� �...... .�..�..�......,..�...�.....
•i
• ii,,
.rY rrw•r w►.w. w...r._. �..w.•_�•_w�." •My.f.w •" wI Mw
• !l
.rn••�w•. +.wr�.,r.�,.� ..w�.�w•r.�r_...r+.ry..r..•.+r�1 • •_.►r.ww..�.•+r�1
•1
�•��...w•r•_�•••Y_w_•- —__.• t V w.r,w• M•�rrr ••••wr••fM w,w.M.w�.r+_•.��wr+I.w••_•r•��,
'l �.Y•M•Yw•••�•••w .wM•�w�w,�+Nr.�...•.�1w�•w.+_nr�,�,w1��.+.. __•�.• M.r..1�. �.w•1. �1
•••�+Mw•wr s•rw�w+w r'N.wr•.�••�r.w Yam•.-..•.•.+r,w.•w...y�.•�,...•w••_wr_w ••4t_+�.w r^.. ��•+r.__. .• ....w...._w•
j,j I
,
r 1. 1 •1.' F �� � 1• =1 `i fl f •,� 1;1/, • �I ••• Ill'+Jr 1 •• I I !•i/1 �. :•�►fl• � '1y'.., •/iC
!tt`:/,1.►1;41t►f. 1 t�;ifit f, ►: , tr. f1 til .. '. I I ! 1 ! h = 4
ri � -� •r ! .�1.`.. t'4 'S, v. ''it •" �C'..� R` .i!'� �'.�� r 5+5,, :.;:� _ �•Tb-, II - �"F ;,� , 1 1. 'a
?EMCtNwro4:QfV�l)(SL1 I1 'l "ANY° At1UtI"li1f:AI II�11 {INN111 lilw "Nilf 1 it ItiIY• Ijl lt! Li+; It '
11�l�Y;:• '(1��.�::j = •i-,:•" f �:4 ::tyfw i Ir i�. ;1 _ .1 r• 1 t'<' Y �.
r rtrt MFNT:To; TH I sTuar. IfSE A011I T'l0NA1 PArvFS 11" NrCI S�nIt1l.•i , : .:, ; >
11 .
I] w..�.���M..�w. - r�.w N•►,_�/w.I_ ��.r•._���wA���•�..A.../.Y<.�M..t•r•.M.r.= •I 1•
' . -`� .w/�,_� •rr.IMw/wV►..`w..•r..r..w�.r�_..���rr..wwM��+Il��•h.^� .�-
1
, w�� ...rwY�r�.r�l++ar�...••ri.f wr.�.fw•
,✓mow i 1��� ."'wr
..mow / r'.' .rl �"'r'w.r.w�.�..w.� �•
l
Y
. I -I,�,. AVER"ALL 'OR A-PORTION
PLEASE .E INDICATE ALL OTHER AGENCIES WN1CN �H�VE JURISUICTIOM � ,�.- rcr.:•-.
OF THE PROJECT, WILL NAVE Yt1 ,CONStt?ER PERMITS FOR THE PROJECT, ARE INV01_VEp 'IN THE r
RROJfCTS FUNDING, OR ARE OTHERWISE. AFFECTED 7ED BY THE PROJECT:
• _..ram_._..._���: :,
SUBMITTED BY: DATE:
(Signature)
,, •fit, -
MAILING ADDRESS:
ZIP CODE
PHONE NUMBER: AREA CODE. { )
t
RU-VIEWED' AND FINALIZED BY:�„'
DATE• ..._..
_ it .
n J�tlolat7
si"tt fteh ,' Cali!'. 9074
Memdt?al,°Hall`; 5th acid Peoatt,
Huntington Beach-, Calif
Subject : Request for An•aexatior ,'ot Sunset Bee ch .
'to the WAY of Huntington Beach
Deer. Sir
1Ne, ..they t dere`igsciedl;,P:'respect uest' rr.t. heq
city of Huntigton':Beandertaku`ths neaesear7
at ,ttie
atepii
toward 4=exati;on ''to: Huntington Bfaoh "ot' the uninaorpar4`
ated area�.of Orange County known is Swaaet Beach
t 1. _}f''"'f���l� y'�'' .` ' -�f��?,^f rf " 11•:/� fTe.� C11�.*
sr .Ae reaidentaand :property .otaers of; Suuq�•dst :Beach We
are delicated o F'th`e itrnnediat e;weuid, loxig. snags, goals of
preserving' improving 'Ij i =�beaufifying Soh' t t,Beaah �;
To,,;aaoataplish these`obJactives;we Took' forwaYd to diiel"
I,. j a
our' Pleainiin Oommiea `on.' and ot,•he Cit a der Plan':d ru
op3ng aa'mutuallyr_.deeirable. and ltea8ibls Mast
or
cotoarne�d.
The request for aanexation is made of a our ae; rrith ,the:.
understanding that a Master 'Plan accept able.'to; this ''com-'
b developed rior to the annexation election.
munit would e
Yp �
This, Master Flan endnew long range Program wand;
be' 'developed for„ the behefit,� of our, residente, property
ovaers; and business interests', aalwell as the citizens
Of Huntington Beach and Orange County.
-
The$ Orange County Planning Commission ourrently .has
under consideritti on proposals for zoning,, changes which ere
unacceptable to.,,thi a community. Therefore, we.. would apprec-
iate your consideration and action on this request at the
earliest possible date.
Very truly yours ,
T King res
, ,
Sunset Beach Chem er of Commeres
fl ,L I J
a rm" 70 vmmun ty Go oil and Member ,. Chas e o
:for 'she Preaer ation d Im- 'C rce , 1, Sunset oh
pro ' ement of .Sunset each
IJ
eat er, zen a Advisory airman , o f ue
Board committee
W AV
o- chairs" ra prore- reasurer,' ex •r OY Cameras
want Co•rittee sure e' t Beach
,fir• , 1-� ri'.:
/ � 1 40
Jv- 7
e
r�
i
{r
11 I
t
11
I
1
4
t
I
,
I � .
1 +
v.,• ,'. It � �. T.
[kdA
,11
No' Iti rtlN, Black P18111 t CIA-W Si
P.O. Box-ilk CALIF IA 01"
0
Fabruary 3, 1969
. ~. CO,
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ••`�.. J9
FROM% Planning Col miasian
t
SUBJECT: Bequest. for Annexation``of Sunset Beach to
the City-• of Huntington Beach
ATTENTION: Doyle Miller, City Administrator
Paul Jones, City Clerk ,
Gentlemen:
F , ��� c°,r.� l'' ,�+ ^' y hF,irp v;•. 1 fj T't `�, 1 1 , -a • ft [;,:lvi?a •-t ..
The Cit of Huntington Beach` hi"z been��re uestid to' ur�dertakik
the, necessary; stepa�`to , annex an, uninaatporated#area;,:of s,t�ra',
Count _ known as Sunset Beach, by'. certain :residints •asd s ro
part y. owners of Sun"set ;Beach. This requeit was forrraxdad` to
. t
the lanniing Commission-:'at the. January ,_21j 19699, meetin$-,for
a; report o`r,recommendation to.:your Honorable Body pursuant to
Section 35iO8 of the Annexation Act of 1913 .
40
a .
con era�atl.on it''was , thR P1annS.ti ` Ca�w►f saioi *
;.
After, ' s
unanLaw�is :,decision •toC;recoassettc! in7� iew o �th'e:"iripidity of
this; proposal'; s, culmination, tha a� positive. approach: bet
taken iri the'deve a►pmen o ti. 4a - y:` p Z t f n j artion��ttud pro raw rThe
City, won ,. p t ,. r .t
king��in cla•e� coo aration NihSunsyet each: coursity
rep resentative's; should - idei of rob lems, and offer •'alternative
solutions concerning the area ariid�the' propoiid•. ann ication.
1 r w rslsaninptabls ,should be
a, [text, -1: .workeble.' Moister. Plan mu'fi al
developped (3)Third;r:.a program of ps
g of thi"`entire area
WOUId bt .cia isin&ted or in process. prior to anntxatioa. This
ppracess Mould include an accaliiated studyy of the area cow-
bined with positive action as different phases of the study
are co4leted.
Respectfully ubmitted,
r
Secretary, Planning Commission
KARsdr
mob
i 1�
ORIGINAL, COP1 ',
Pok ry 3, 1969
To= IML+iGMU HAYpR, ANDCITY COMIL
blNft 1'l aii� COMjGii6a .
St 1-ill is qw t for Anneuxtioa of Est Beach to
ttM Cfty" of Mmtnst on h
ATTMIOINs Dayla Millar Cit�Ioft
�AdorWatrator
Paul James, Uty
, ' •,J a i _:.':;�4 I •1',• { 7 t .1t ,
a.
Tho City of of Ibmt ia8too:I4acb l" b rand tad to u irtil
f - �ca�irA • a.:t� 'max, �a �oolaa�c� otodl�ssa of
y ,tiat�a�wn ao ` niot `Bomb, b� ��.oia���ild�rata and prow
rt Tai
' Cttumt
cnrri' of Smart: Il rcb:.1 Ilk fos trdrd to
4
C.a�i�afw at tb� Jo�u.r'y` :.t9�►9 waitiad for
a Tt otr , do n to YC Hobo Is Holy pay mmt to
S vn; 35108 of tip A=msmtieu Act of 1913. ,a
Aftas cooaido tiax It, woa.e`thi P Comim�iiaica!W
mum 0101AW daciai '.to. it viov o for 1 1xlit of r
e r Y- ,
ow'P 1 *" wl tr�rti.00, tbit 'a&,positivo ;
tA1Am tls.inr dswl?Put
nt ,)f an',,Mti'aa i �. : :Tw
l C t�atlaa' titith�5�un art; a n t `+
CItY r h skiLi`` tuld iti d la'`i�rlrrr `rl�.iina�tirYirr
Treat .:, �► of
mQualow 606"%a izr� tb Arid
t
mtt a woxw bls:l toy Plan MWAIM141 is, wmuld, be ,
drvrf . .4_'Tbls'd, 4 pro Sr m of pi+o-�lliap of the am
d a►lariorted: or' in p—mmuAso ,prior ,*6 summtimo Tlri*
0- UVOIA 1=18do •u aar.�rlt *L" of um aTrr
b 1 with paaitOw .cticm a. different - phums of the study
ass caapl �'
tftlly mgmittsd
F
M« A &Wmldo
r
8t�rrtasyr, PL11p Cematiiria�el
t
(r .•h
i`
1
nagill:017
4J J"i . . A HNr+I Cb►IIwOA/ . . � re� •. . 702 SrelOr Crwrn . .624•49.34 . . Arm Code 213 • '
B* I O1ZOMU
dF
/AIMM 1Mt11wI� ",
Irra $WNW"**
'�IAI M.�wlirf. °i
r a Mctw Kra Pka_0. :00"
�t cleft
+ ,
rrrri Inw•M.I�r+rr.Tw...,.., ,• .
Mac �. �w►a.N B� HMCbi Ca►11faa'nis
MIS rAcw
D"T }a1i1,
Plwe accuse ,the dals� in j& l.a� �Yrour, iogti�.r�r
Qooae ��ha Of the+Y �t1aR :: 5
rw rtz s, ll ; paro op "
# lends rdAai" gcent to; the -'city'. sZNo
v youA"ti'ilr bill"
•tt tAe,Amoriaw"Ur?Aaaocietian',Asomm .3 diif*M
,A•" AL mom ate tax'a an
cr+,.... ..w..+.. desk. .,:Y boa a:qurstiaa''caa"rnint the �SlUit, `of
a+hww�.�.,
COMMONastloa':in rls�r,of a 19b� iti to. tin eae�a►tio�r' L1rrs.
„AAn �• csd+ der 1894 ' atatutei; 1g63, Ndded 8ea�kioa 'tip v�
. r
'M"`,�,,..,C" '.,... nwt 'ow 'to limit annemata m Of-t14wla;b vwied' by t" stau
art c.'o .hr to th of for
S 1r1w.11�N.,-trr�w
w og.M«tt =Utift UrA babies of tbi city%', exWedkd item the padnt 'Y
Ckt c....OROM,1*6 A.pb. VM" the I&M b0i11nderiM lntwMect the sho"11"` at Owk an
1�r1 �;.Mpwcwu�
'to the Oha�lift rod fQU
�.r.►.a.rw. �i2•a OM1M iwb r rtau"e tit MW
4010.r`►.�IGAM4 be appew" by the Bute 7Mc& Commission.
ait�atio4"i rAzich tbe' nd ioe�ais
•• Thi purpaie.`o!'iihiw b111�'va+s d,the•ta a�i
•r 1w��.. pt'o,�or tlao OWN. w tort
.i�.cr MrM w is ba aftna=ti4� of tid�r3.aads V1thoV the at ti0q O
bordariM Mar i. r"-ar"1" t" Wt �
wrw,tiww+rwr " .
-
resldeotr at the tAd lioot�ecito kart •�y
r"fiOw.., 0" t 04M of �ti IU&f `'r Jbo abaeret' t0 tha t�tr.,vt' 8icarM� !
ems,war �'Mea�!'�1�►.tbat it MOAteC1 tiO the 1Mioeotel�tlM arm ' 't "r'
ar i.r•.�w.,0.•. kw � t3isl �lydt 11d�a�ielt LO �r did tLrt . .
zAp"t«ri:w`�ic"""w. hom no 000tral tiff! the tii4la0lr r�eh Mi�LQ 1M ��Yd, e1Mt t0
�../I�d... t" t'14 1101it•. fte,00ROU" V&S tllo 6"Ica d to pgvmt ,.tbe
0" W.'•t1Aw O" .Of Owhowaw 16%K r ti • am" of MtwbllahisS tpr
•"••'"`"b•.• to prvM ty. bolas` orexei but Mhich I k eaa tleatity AIM 1be
r�'A. MMtNu'`
a.. .�.N.p.. r..� v@LmA porliaa ad the city.
R is wwu' '
i. o::n slawp! go am discuss tkit son at % M city marks
.rw...r sfit�l 1% oft' M Is the XNAW" rM MW rah to Alow"s
w this with,`aftei d. P106rtt I slow the auto i� 0*01imian
OF MW ina
.�....n�•,r. O t err Ther they Aw M " soli � "Me or
AVO+kX
11s lel�eet 1►3xO�
--- --
i
t
i
I
August 25 y 1965 ,
f . t01 L''Ost3 4 biller, City A3ainiatrator
i .
Phq�s onne� As clasp Planning Director
all Annexalloa of County territory
At their ' study meeting last night, the P24nning . Oar■linvioa
diswweed annexation, of water &M beaob' betas the
ext*asioon of Mayer .0vaus �d tbo Os_7 of Baal easb;
' and troa Ocean Atenae to the Uwe* &lie 11mi.tO It should
be;;acted that Ocean Avenar in tie Stao0e1 'De sari - ' hurt e14e
091my area lit a, dedicated street .(altlh it I a ,b*W*)
annexation in We area could inaiede scam Avg*"�
still 1-retain a 200 `,'foot aorri.de r between .Daewet Dom'
the Solna China properilesp sad not Include any houAlag.
2be Plana$ Cam lealm thinks the City a�oald iaw+otisielt
a:ueez this territetye !hw g ,.ftis earmaiaatio id rent
to u. wi*k the idea of i.xts'.rail b t hlaaa�tl ; ti -
OersasionIM thiald►a� to ew att46tis� vM Oi Q ilia ,;,
atttallen and thereby IaLtlat." the proper amexalt M
proeeedia�s. • '�
„
. Y
,`, / r 1 1. ,1 _ ,•� ` 1� i ." 1 • I
. t
? . +., y t•f. Jj J. � ' I y 1 4:r,�J ro•, }: I �� �J IC+ 4;! r.•.? V�.
' t : '• ','•f�.•. <, ! 1 ? lid .J � ti ,�� •I!?` _�:':'17�r�dct/-� /<i '.,. Ir Ji 1�3 • � ..
J ,
.. .,�_ _ � uf11L1. A� �f.n. 1 I '1A'+!`1 .:-s•s ....�`.� t.i. : .G"S .. t ',i`�. ,,.J1,. •. .., .. • .,:X.:J
(D
ORANGE COUNTY
ADMI141STRATION BUILDING
U N r Y C)F P. a. nOx •11a
n4 SANTA ANA. CALircr!NIA
TELEPNONVIt •34.2239
AREA COOE 714
1
i' LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
July 19, 1967
:F City of Huntington Beach
' P. 0. Box 190
Chairman
MILLIAMAM 0. MARTIN
Huntington Beach, California
May*?
r Clry of Laguna BeachAttention: Paul C. Jones, City Clerk
I
Vice Chairman
I CNARLES A.IEARSON
Representative of Gentlemen:
General Public
I
Notice is hereby given that i , public hearing will be
DAVID !BAKER held, by , the local Agency Formation Commission of
Supervisor Orange County orl August 9, 1967 at- 2:00 P.M.
s.ca.d District in Room ,503, Orange County Administration Building,
515 North Sycal"m' ote Street, Santa Ara, California on
' c. M `FEATNf;RLY
Supervisor designated
proposed annexation to the City of Seal Beach
ti designated as Annexation No. 67-1 .
First District
Pursuant to B lasw No.; 1.5;; representatives of cities and
GEORGE b. NONOLD districts gnuy be required by the ` Chairman of , the, Coen-
y ..
r.►dMayot�. mission Grit the. time of the hearing to p{r'ssent, :.or to
have previously► filed a re solution 'o,f ;theJagisl.ative
body of the city or dietrict authorizitngg such represent
Altarnae atives to appear on behalf of the distinct or city.
WILLIAM HIRSTrIN Authorization may be for a specific proposal or, goner-
s,r►.►vi..r ally, for any proposal under consideration by the
FaurlA District `r
Coviini s sion,
IVery truly yours ,
A1laroat•
GLENN G. WALTERS
Meyer
F II•rtn
•
I 1!.chard . T. Turner
!r Executive Officer '
I RICMAND T. TURNER
faEarewtive office, �tTT/ih
a '`
•• � !l
Page 1 of 3
DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION NO, 67. 1 TO THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH:
1 Ai�rew�be�►�-a0aa RV�44ed-Mafiolh-4967 Revised ?Ray 18, 1967
2 Beginning at the intersection of the West line of the East Half (E 112)
3 of Section 13, Township 5 South, Range 12 West, S, B, M. , in the County of
r 4 Orange, State of California, with the Northerly boundary of Ujcation No. 141
5 State Tide Lands, described in Patent issued April 4, 19010 said intersectiop
6 being also the point of beginning of the legal description of Annexation No, 7
7 to the City of Seal Beach, California; thence along the boundary lino of said j
e City, S 87. 301 E 1148. 14 feet, S .3.91 45' E 904. 20 feet and S 52. 451 E
9 219, 01 feet to an angle point in the Northerly line,of the boundary line of the
i
10 City of Huntington Beach, California, said boundary line having been ,
11 established by Sunset Beach No. 2 Annexation in Ordinance No. 1053 of said
• 12 City of Huntington Beach; thence leaving said Seal Beach boundary line and
13 along said Huntington Beach boundary line, S 46. 321 00" W 139. 2 feet,
14 N 43. 28- 07" W 90. 00 feet, S 46. 321 00" W 53. 76 feet to a non-tangent curve
15 concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 5844, 60 fact, Southeasterly along
' 16 said curve 150. 89 feet, more or less, through a central angle of 1" 281 45",.
• 17 N 58. 00' 00" W 50. 39 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Southwesterly and
18 having a radius of 5832. 60 feet, Southeasterly along said curve 104. 72 feet,
•
• 19 more or lops, through a central angle of 1. 03' 27", tangent to said curve
20 S 43. 28' 00" E 95. 07 feet, and N 460 32, 00" E 5, 00 goat to the most Westerly
21 corner of the boundary line of said City of Huntington Beach an established by
22 Sunset Beach No. 4 Annexation in Ordinance No. 1119 of said City of
„ 23 Huntington Beach; thence along last mentioned boundary line and leaving said
. 24 Sunset Beach No. 2 Annexation S'43• 281 00" E 944. 44 feet to the most
25 Westerly corner of the boundary line of said City of MmUngton Beach as
! 26 establifbtd by Sunset Beach No. 1 Annexation in Ordinance No. 593 of said
27 City of HUOUagton Beach; thence leaving said Sunset 'beach No, 4 Annexation '
88 ssw aldai Swasst 2"ah No. 1 Aaaw ation S 4311 28' Coll B 100, 40 feet to a
alp
I, y�l1NeM • 171N1p« • 1�lLe01�
04
Page 2od3 ,
DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION NO. 67-1 TO THE CITY'OP SEAL BEACH.
1 Revised May 18, 1007
2 tangent curve concave Northeasterly havini a radius of 057. 00 feet,
l
3 Southeasterly along said curv. 208. 41 feet, more or less, through a central
4 angle of 170 511 58", leaving said curve N 240 301 00" W 11. 70 feet to a non-
• 5 tangent curve concave Northeasterly having a radius of 950. 00 feet and being
6 concentric with said 957. 00 foot radius curve, Southeasterly along said
7 960. 00 foot radius curve 100. 25 Meet, more or leas, through a central angle
8 of 610. 02 ' 46"; tangent tc said curve S 660 52' 00" E 215. 02 feet to a tangent
9 curve concave Southwesterly having a radiva of 1060. 00 feet, Southeasterly
. 10 along said curve 50. 97 feet through o central angle of 2. 45' 18" to the most ,
11 Southerly corner of said Sunset Beach No. 1 Annexation, said corner being
- 12 on the common lino between Rancho La Boisa Chic& and Rancho Los Alamitos;
r 13 thence S 496 28' 00" W along Bald common line 511 feet, more or lean, to its
14 intersection with the ordinary high water mark as established by boundary '
' 15 agreement reco:ded in book 7988 page 763, Official Records of said County, j
16 said high-water mark also shown on a map filed in book 66 pages 35, 36 and
17 37 of Records'of Surveys; thence leaving said common line N 43. 45' 11" W
18 along said high water mark 1109. 03 feet, 'N 48. 53' 37" W 1004. 50 feet,
19 N 496 52' 36" W 957. 14 feet and N 56* 15' 04" W 6. 73 feet; thence leaving said
20 boundary agreement line and continuing along said Record of Survey line slid
21 its Northwesterly prolongation N 560 15' 04" W 43 feet, ,more or less, to the
22 Southeasterly boundary line of the territory incorporated under the name of
Z3 the C:.1y of Seal Beach by order of the Board of Supervisors of said Orange
24 County an October 25, 1915; thence Noirtheasterly along last mentioned
25 So�thexxterly boundary line 30 feet, mare or less, to 'ie intorsection with thee
26 North-South quarter section ling of Section 24, T-*'wnahip 5 South, Range 18
27 W*st, a. ]a, bt. , said intersection being an angle point in last mentioned
3$ torly bowul T Una. tbeace eoatLautng Mong said Seat Beach bowWary
88-2325 trMKsw
Page 3of3
i
DESCRIPTION Of" ANNEXATION NO. 67- 1 TO THE CITY OF SEAL nrACH.
1 Revised May 16, 1967
2 line Northerly along quarter section lines to the Southwest corner of the
3 territory annexed to said City of Seal Beach September, 1028 per Seal Beach
• 4 Ordinance No. 148, said corner being on the Southerly line of Electric Lans;
5 thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of last mentioned annexed
6 territory to the Southeasterly corner thereof, being also the intersection of
7 the Easterly prolongation of said Southerly line of Electric "ne with'the
8 Westerly line of Coast Highway; thence Northwesterly along the Easterly line
8 of last mentioned annexed territory and along last mentioned Westerly line to
10 the Northerly corner of last mentioned annexed territory, being the point of
I
11 beginning of this description.
12
13 .
14 .
!: 15
16
17
19 ,
20
21
22 ,
.9.33
24 ,
26
27
28 SB-1326 - Ch[Xtvn
, r
' V�OK1ANs�s . '�PIIN01.rt . M��O�1 •
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION Oi id�1'
P. 0. Box 838 for Master
:
Santa Ana, California MUST BE RETURNED
P tle . 8 k4 22 39
TO CITY CLERK
M .�MORANDUM
July 12, 1967
TO: City of Huntington Beach
P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, 'California
Attention : Paul C. Janes, City Clerk
FROM: Richard T. Turner, Executive Officer
RE: Proposed annexation to the City of Seal Beach '
designated as Annexation 67w1 .
Purivant.,'to its Bylaw No 33, .`the Local :Agency, ForMatiun
ino, f � a oteg y o pt. an'' the
advieability' ntermsof� hegeneral. public interest , re-
garding thefactors. named in Government Code Section 54796
as they relate to the special concern of your agency. Copies
of the ''Justification of Proposal" and map are attached.
IA
Thisuptoppooa es eon aet -;fat• hearing before this Commission ,
Q 9, 1,067 and :the Commission wou =dsion,
a�
ciate r o your report no later tha July 28
The report should be delivered to the secre
County Administration Building, 515 North Sycamore Street, Room
501, Santa Ana.
If you feel the importance of the proposal from ';the point of
view of, )your. agency makes it advisable to continue the; hearing
to a later `date in order to allow time for further study,
please furnish an interim report so indicating, but containing
your tentative advice on the proposal.
Richard T. Turner
Executive Officer
r
• f
A•.•,t , it't'j _. t, .,4 *7r;.;,1 i"},: < -. :'a%. .-,....,..c:JfAjfi%n'iSkt •r - �_. ���" '......-t, _ __, .. _� _ ... . .�
i
JUSTIFICATION OF 'PROPOSAL
TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION `COMI&SION
FIFTH FLOOR - ROOM 593
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING . .
515 NbRTH SYCAMORE STREET
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
• MAILING ADDRESS : .
P. 0. Box 838
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
FROM: City of Seal Beach n19667
California JULSUBJECT: JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL LpCHARD TC4L AGOy�R , EXECUTIVE OF '
TITLE OF PROPOSAL Annexation 67-1 f04rlON CDeuu, flCER
A. GENERAL '
1 . TYPE AND DESIGNATION OF PROPOSAL: Annexation of
inhabited territory to the City of Seal Beach,
2. STATUTORY PROVIS1014S GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS : !
Annexation Act of 1913- inhabited territog
•I
3. THE REASONS FOR THIS PROPOSAL ARE AS FOLLOWS :
Request by property owners and voters within area
pro os ed to be annexed.
='s.:! -�t-,�} ` ' ,',C.. ')•,.'1 f 40
. a l��:r s..t: t,.4 .'h°S r :`. ta.`•... "1f.:Y4. ..+^+•r....+.r. ws'.WM.,..h •`F �yi. >........�..-..... -
_ _T-_.-�-. - .. _ ... .. .d 1.4�,,,,,r" )t.;•1?+Tetip . r — .-....+.....-.......r.MfM u
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
B. PHYSICAL FEATURES
1. LAND AREA : SQUARE MILES .07 ; ACRES 44
2. STATE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TOPOGRAPHY:Portion of area
south of Pacific Coast a,Highway is generally flat, beach area
adjacent to Pacific Ocean; area north of Pacific Coast
HiShway is marsh tidal land.
3. DESCRIBE "NATURAL" BOUNDARIES : (RIVERS, MOUNTAINS,
FREEWAYS, ETC. )
The proposed annexation is bounded on the south by the
■r- r .r r.r. - r r.�r_r..r.�.rr
Pacific Ocean. A portion of the northern boundary- is
rrr• • -
the Pacific Coast Highway. `
4. DESCRIBE DRAINAGE BASINS , RIVERS, • FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL,
ETC.
The area north of Pacific Co'astHighway is a marsh tidal area
adjacent to R wa ter way connecting Anaheim Landina� and the
proposed aLquatic_^ park. The area south' of Pacific Coast
drains generally to tze adjacent Paci 'c Ocean.
Highway g yx n.
5. DESCRIBE MAJOR HIGHWAY ACCESS TO Thy: AREA :
The proposed annexation is seryed�primarily bZ the Pacific
r - .r r r w
,Cgas t Highway ,California #1) .
C. POPULATION , ND RELATED NATTERS.
1 . POPULATION IN SUBJECT AREA :
Approximately 375
2. POPULATION DENSITY (I .E. PER SQUARE MILES, PER ACRE. ) :
The density of the restdsntJ#1 Area only is a roxim t-G
46 per acre: the density of the entire aririexation land
��. .rr�rrrrrti ..�..�.�wu.
area is A22roximatelyer gerg, .
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
-3. NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS : Approximately 107
4 . NUMBER OF DV,`ELL'1NG UNITS : 176
5. PROXIMITY TO OTHER POPULATED AREAS :Sunset Beach.' an
unincorporated area of a ro cimatel.y 1 100 is adjacent to
t e east, porcioK3 o —r- L' p of Huntington Beacfi are adi'acent
to the north east, the City of Seal Reach is adjacent to :he
west. ,
6. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNTI ICAh'T INCREASE IN POPULATION IN
NEXT 10 YEARS :As the ,arita will be zoned R-1 and is of high
density for that zomUhg``classification, it is not likely that
there will be any significant increase in population 'in the
4,
next LO : years .
7. LI}CLIHOOD OF SIGNI.FICANT INCREASE IN ADJACENT AREAS
IN NEXT 10 YEARS :
A. IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS :Small_gradual increases
population may rake place in the Sunset Beach area du nding
jzpon future land use plans as they may be approved by the
overningg agencx.
& B. IN IN=;?ORATED AREA., : The City of Seal Beach
projections are for a population of 45,000 by 1985 within
, . present -coKporate boundaries.
` D. ECONOMIC FACTORS
1. ZONING A14D RELATED MATTERS :
A. DESCRIBE TIC EXISTING LAND USE' IN THE AREA WHICH '
IS TM SUBJECT OF THIS PROPOSAL.Apuroximately .5 acres are
i
devoted to co=ercial uses ; there is approximately 21 acres, of --?
beach area, much of which is privately owned; approximately $. 2
Y..r...�f�.r tr rr n..r rr.w�r.�- •rr r
acres is devoted to residentlil uses the remainin& acreale , is
' 1
in streets , vacant or undeveloped land. •
t
`.' L ;, . ,.. .a.•1',�d$a`►°+'•_/t.n✓.•yiy..w..t•tn h-.rn...... _-
rr.r••• _. .- 1.. .��. ... . . ........i ••' �.r.•-..•.••rr♦ 1'w.rw.ow...r.�Mr•+r,+.; wM+ •..+.��.� 7�r
1% 7
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
B. •DETAIL EXISTING ZONING i The res idFntiAl `area' is
zoned R-4,, the co--wercial area id zoned C-2. i
C. DESCRIBE PROPOSED NEW ZONING OR CHANGES IN ZONING,
IF ANY. ,
It is Manned that the residential area will be zoned R-1,
the co=ercial area C-2, the railroad right of way placed
in an interim zone, and the remaining beach or tidal property;; ,,;
to be unzoned.
2. ASSESSED VALUE IN AREA :
A. LAND: 793�34D
B. IMPROVEiCr•NTS : 1951L560
Total 9BBS900
C. AMOUNT OF PUBLICLY OWNED''LAIM IN AREA:_,Z acres
exclusive of beach and streets ,,
3. AMOUNT OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA : Not in excess
of $1,000.
E . GOVERNIV NTAL SERVICES IN AREA : (DESCRIBE IN SUCH DETAIL
AS IS APPROPRIATE TO T' r. AREA THE EXISTING GOVERNPlENTAL
SERVICES AND CONTROLS IN THE AREA INCL,U'DING, .FOR EXAMPLE,
POLICE ?ROTECTION, FIr'tE PROTECTION, HEALTH SERVICES, -
GARBAGE AND TRASH COLT:CTION, LIBRARIES, , PARKS AND PLAY-
GROUNDS, SEt•TRS." STREETS,, -STREET LIGHTvNG, ETC. )
._ See attached page 4a.
f
'.• •.. ..�J• • • . • ... • . .,_.r_ ..� �. . ••d. ,•tl.. .A•. �r •')w..'1�.�►«....wr..r......r-r.w..,•r... +. +►'�1I.
E. CON! tal Services In At ea
Police Protectionv Count), `Sheriff supplemented by ' rA'.vate
patrol.
Fire Protection : O"ounty Fize Department, volunteer station,,
in Sunset Beach.
Refuse Collection: Sunset S1tnitar1 District provides for
this, service.
Streets : Streets wit��, 'in the colony ,,are owned and maintained �
as private. streets ; Pacific Coast Highway is ' a state highway.
Health Service : Orange County Health Department.
Libre: Orange County Library branch in Sea•1 Beach.
Sewers and Sew Treatinent : Sunset :sanitary .District.
General Government : Orange County.
Surfside Storm linter Protection District ; Beach erosion and
maintenance.
Surfside Community Service Districts Legal services , entrance
gate, etc.
,
:�`1 4&
Ol—
• .•.•w.r. ..• r.i • v r ...••-.r.. •• a •. •.w.S. w•. •• r 1wr..•• .•, yri•ir�, • •r+ w •. �iy �r.w�••�w•�•Mw��i•�.►rrM.•w••YM ••V
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
F. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS :
1 . _DESCRIBE THOSE GOVERNI4ENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS WHICH
SHOULD BE PROVIDED WHICH ARE NOW NOT PROVIDED OR WHICH
SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN INCREASED AMOUNT IN THE AREA.
See page 5A,and 513, ,
2. ESTIMATE PROBABLE FUTURE NEED FOR NEW OR INCREASED
GOVERNb7,IJTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS IN THE AREA.
� I��,P�'Lt;�S�.thx'� r.�.p��� ; •'�.S��L.Pw.P�.�g.� �emTn,•a_,rgb 1 e
to those provided other areas of the city, would be sufficient
in the foreseeable future considering` the development of the
area as an R-1 zoned territory.
3 . DESCRIBE HOW YOUR PROPOSAL LETS THE NEED WHICH YOU
HAVE DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS F, 1 and 2 ABOVE.
In outlining the needs in Para raphs F 1 and 2 above, the
proposed method of meetin the needs are also outlined.
4. THAT ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION EXIST FOR McETING
THE NEED DESCRIBED ABOVE? DESCRIBE AND EVALUATE :
See page 5C.
G. WHAT REVENUE WILL YOUR PROPOSAL REQUIRE FOR THE ACCOMPLISH-
MNT OF ITS GOALS AND WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTIVE SOURCES OF
SUCH REVENUE?
See pa&e 5D.
•
♦
• 1.
r
Fe Need for Additional Governmental Servides and Controls ;
General Government : The City of Seal Beach is a chartered
city with a five member City Council elected for four year
overlapping terms by districts and a council-manager form
of gcvernment. The 5 member' planning commission is appointed
for four year overlapping terms by the City Council. The
City Mall. is less than two road miles from the proposed
annexation , thereby being considerably more- convenient for
residents of the area in handling of local governmental
matters affecting their area. Many of the problems of the
area, particularly in the field of zoning, are similar to
those of areas currently in the Ciry and therefore could
receive localized attention.
As the proposed annexation area is immediately adjacent to
the city any development, growth and/or lack of development
will affect, to some extent, the remaining portions of the
city, particularly any developments that will occur within
the city (or the c i ty ' s sphere of influence) in the souti:-
easterly area of the city.
It is contended that the representation provided by a city
government would be more responsive to local needs and that
a combination of city representative and county supervisorial'
representation would be beneficial to the area proposed to be
annexed.
Police Protection : Presently police protection is provided
along beach areas and streets adjacent to the proposed
• annexation. The size of the area and poptll::tion would not
seemly impose an undue burden on the present police strength,
As most of the beach area is :private property and restricted
by the layout of the residential area from extensive, use by
the general public, it is not anticipated that beach crowds
•will present a problem.
B station within `
Y having a police 'two miles , an adequately..
manned department including sufficient patrol strength, the
amount of patrol time devoted to the area will undoubtedly
be increased and thereby enahle th ! colony to either dispense
with or reduce the use of private patrol services .
� -� • • Say
Need for Additional Governmental Services and Controls (contld)
Police Protection (cont'd)
The city will also enforce traffic regUlations within the
colony on the private streets , in accordance with the State `
Vehicle Code, and thereby offer a partial solution to the
• area parking problems .
Fire Protection; The area is currently classified as 9 B .`
by the Pacific Fire Elating Bureau for insurance purposes.
This is a very undesirable rating and indicates a need for
increased fire protection and fire defense services,
Present services are provided by a volunteer fire fighting
force.. �
The City of Seal Beach has on order an aerial platform
(snorkle) truck and an additional 1,500 gpm pumper, ,
which together with the city ' s three 1,000 gpm pumpers
and other equipment, provides considerable f?exibility
in fire fighting appa,"atus . '
The City has initiated a program of staffing fire stations
with .full time profcssional Fire fighting personnel. It is
anticipated that the company which will be the "first in"
for the proposed annexation area will be staffed with full
time personnel wj.thin approximately 1� years and will be the
third full time firefighting company. "Second in" response
would be provided by a company with full time personnel.
The proposed annexation area is within two miles running
distance of the first response fire company as recommended
by the American Insurance Association (National Board of
Fire Underwriters) for residentail areas .
There is little doubt therefore that the present fire
fighting capabilities will be somewhat improved currently
and that over the succeeding years, the service will improve
substantially.
' park and Recreation: The area ' s basic recreation area is the
beach front, both private and publicall.y oiraed. The city, would
be responsible for lifeguard service in the' publicAl,ly owned
areas and would staff the area with personnel during the summer
and provide roving checks during the winter season. This
follows the basic pattern of current services.
w
,
• 5b.
•
• ' I
F. What alternative courses of action exist for meeting the j
need described above :
1. Alternative : ' The area proposed to be annexed to
' Seal Beach might be annexed to another city.
Evaluation: The proponents have not indicated a desire
or willingness to be annexed to their other neighboring
city. The proposed annexation area is within the Seal
Beach Elementary School District and the residents of
the area tend to do much of the shoppin& .in Seal Beach.
A portion of the area is bounded on the north by Seal
Beach and annexation to another city could present
boundary difficulties .
2. Alternative : Incorporation.
Evaluation : Completely insufficient tax base even when
combined with other nearby unincorporated areas.
3. Alternative : Remain an unincorporated terrtit!i v.
Evaluation : The proponents contend that governmenal
services would be enhanced by a local government with
the representation of a locally elected council. Zoning
� y
problems could receive consideration by an agency faced
with similar problems in adjacent areas. By consolidating
work forces with the city the cost to the Colony for �
street and beach maintenance could be reduced. The
residents of the area appear to recognize that there is
PP �
a need for municipal type services and desire to have an
opportunity to determine the city of thdir choice. It is
recognized that in arriving at solutions to sewer treatment
and water service problems, the assistance of a municipality' s
staff would be helpful even though the financial problems
'► are handled by the annexation area.
i
; I
SC.
C,
C.• What Revenue Will Your Proposal Require For The Accompiishment
'Of Its Goals And What Are The Prespective Sources Of Such
Revenue: ,
• It is estimated that the city would receive the following
annual revenuers :
1 . Property Taxes $12,620 '
2 . Motor Vehicle In Lieu
and Gas Taxes 4, 170
3 . Sales Tax . • , • ,500'
4. Business Licenses 75
Total $17 290 .
' It is estimated that the city. would expend the following
amounts annually:
1. Lifeguard Service $ 3,400 '
2 . Police (proration of costa 5 000
P CP ) �
3 . Beach Clean Up and
Operational Maintenance 5 ,000 '
4. General Government 31000
Total $16 050
It is anticipated that charges for building permits and
similar items would be offset by city expenditures .
Beach erosion costs and problems would continue to be
handled by the Surfside Storm Water Protection District.
1
i
t
5d.
' w�1.�•• ••'•� w ••..r r+• •. .. ••• , ' .. • .....••. w.•• ..rw w+...wr.•w.I rrr,r S��wM ��.
•...r irw�.r7•i..r• !(••.•r.•b••.•. •r.. •• •. .• • .. •• • .. . ►. •.—w........♦ • ..►• r•..••.rrr.rr•rrr+r.►.r..•':.+...r+•��� ----Ohm
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL ,
. H. ESTIMATE TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY` M EFFECT OF THE '
• PROPOSAL ON : '
' 1. ' COST OF GOVERNII-SNTAL SERVICES' AND CONTROLS See'I ttem
for outline of major costs of required additional governob
mental services and controls .
2. ADEQUACY OF GOVERNiNENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS. The
• annexation would enable the area to receive additional fire
and Police services w is
unincorporated territory without the ; creation of expensive-
In'
ecial service districts . The annexat n would also result
io
representation at the sovernmental level.local
P .,
3. MUTUAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS. The pi6posed
annexation area is within the Seal Beach E ementary School"
District ; the area utilizes the county brangh.. library_in-Xhe
City of Sea]. Beach , Seal Beach also provides the closest
p1nc* and Wis3ne_cs centers to th^-amzwx2t4^= Ra
Surfside and the City of Seal Beach are concerned with the
development -of- the-.County .. -�----•--
4. LOCAL GOVERNIENTAL STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTY._,•
See Page 6A
I: TEE NATURE OF ThE PROPOSED CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION CAR
REORGANIZATION AND a by NAKE OR NAMES OF ALL DISTRICTS AND/
OR CITIES FOR WHICH THE CHAiIGz. OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGAN••
• IZATION IS PROPOSED ARE AS FOLLOWS :
The County Structural Fire Protection, District is the only
wr►w...rw •� r r -
service organization and/or special ta:;ing district which
will be eleniinated
..wrr•..• .....•mot • v..M y, J •.2 Zp i:t 4 , rr } '` JJ, y•'{�I •C �MI! aSM.t7 • ._ .,..-�wwy.X•7,1•pMV•,
yyt` r � $i3 I .. :• ) WY: re ..YuT .. - .•,vr•+.rr+.^•
�1r.�yt`:-'-`.�..:'�i!"�•r•"ii�l..t.:.0 ] t-?. ."1STA: tiff -t iy��t �' - -- -. _ � ..--- -
� CIE
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
J. THE NAMES OF ALL OTHER AFFECTED COUNTIES, CITIES AND
DISTRICTS ARE AS FOLLOWS :
• None
OWN i
K. ANY OTHER COI►24ENT WHICH YOU WISH TO MAKE
See page 7a.
L. TO BE COMPLETED FOR FORMATION PROPOSALS ONLY
1. SERVICES AND MAJOR PROJE;:TS TO BE PROVIDED BY .
PROPOSED AGENCY IN FIRST AND SECOND YEAR OF OPERATION:
2. PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY 'S
EXISTENCE. ATTACH PROPOSED BUDGET SHEETS AS EXHIBIT
"B" TO PROPOSED REQUEST.
3. ESTIMATED TAX RATE FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY I S
EXISTENCE. ATTACH TAX RATE PROPOSALS AS EXHIBIT "C" TO
PROPOSED REQttwST.
4 ALTERNATES TO PROVIDING SERVICES OTf(ER THAN BY
INCORPORATION OR FORMATION
•
I
77
• + t
• + 1
H. +4. - Local Governmental Structure of the County.
The proposed annexation area is a part of SupervisoriaY
District Number 2 and the following special taxing dis trio is c•
County Library
County Flood Control ,
County Harbor District
County Mosquito Abatement District
County Structural Fire Protection '
Orange Count, M.W.D.
M.W.D. '
Huntington Beach High School
Seal Beach Elementary School
• Orange Coast Junior College
Sunset Sanitary District
Surfside Colony Community Service District -
Surfside Colony Stores Water Protection District
6a. •
f..
db
•.
K. Any other Comments Which You Wish To Make:
The proponents as residents of Surfside Colony desire to
have the area annexed to the City of Seal Beach. The area
may not be of immediate direct economic benefit to the City
and may even result in a deficit for a period of time. However,
over the long run, as the area develops more modern housing
(which appears - to be very likely because of current land prices)
the annexation of the Surfside Colony area would result in an
advantageous one to the City.
The proponents are willing to provide solutions to many of
their area problems including off-street parking and clearing
title to property held "in common," but may need the staff
assistance of a municipality to achieve the solutions . They
are also willing to continue the financial support of: correcting
the beach erosion problem and thereby not to impose the problem
on the City in general . In order to up-grade their eomMunity
it is their belief, however, that it can be accomplished easier
and faster by working with a municipality. '
The colony is also desirous of maintaining its private, walled-in
community. The City of Seal Beach has had experience with this
type of community within the City (Leisure World - Seal Beach) ,b
a he proposed annexation be approved as
s requested th t t r
It iPP
P P
submitted.
•
•
S
I -
;USTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
i
M. SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFOSMATION WHICH MAY BE OF VALUE TO
THE COMMISSION IN REACHING THEIR DECISION, ON SEPARATE
SHEETS.
N. NOTICES AND C01134UNICATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED CHANGE
SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE FOLLOWING (3 MAXIMUM) :
NAa Lee Risner, City Manager TELEPHONE 431 2527
ADDRESS City Hall CITY ,Seal Beach, C,al L 9O740
WE Philip Bettencourt TELEPHONE 431 2527
j ADDRESS City lull CITY Seal Beach . Calif. 201�0
NAKa" TELEPHONE Aft
ADDRESS CITY
1
Beaux
pity of Huntington
tlrt ArIOAII[t
PAUL C. ZONES
P.O. BOX t90 CALIFORNIA'92640 clrV tLtll■
r-vNT IaCTTY OIEKOFF
1 1 t�c•tucrr
OOYLG MILLER
COUNCILMEN I10u1111At11ATIVt
1AKE R. STEWART, MAYOR or►ICrll
TEO W. BARTLE?T DRANOER D. CASTLE
ALVIN M. COEN Iuntrcrr
ERNEST H. GISLER .oulrlor /cll
N. 1OHN V.V. GREEN
OR. HENRY S. KAUFMAN
OR. OONALO 0. SHIPLEY May 10, 1967
Local Agency formation Commission
515 North Sycamore Street
Room 501, County Administration Building =+
Santa Ana, California
Reference: Proposed Annexation to the
City of Seal Beach No. 67-1
Gentlemen:
c
In keeping with the legislative intent which resulted in the formation of
the Local Agency Formation Commission we ask your honorable body to
seriously consider the following points with respect to the above mentioned
proposed annexation.
Government Code Section 35014 requires than any tide or submerged lands
included within a territory proposed to be annexed to a city must have a
`description of the boundaries and a map filed with the State Lands
Commission for that body's approval prior to the filing of the proposed
annexation with the Local Agency Formation Commission.
The most logical Boundary between the cities of Huntington Reach and Seal
Beach would be the Anaheim Bay and its waterways. Prior to the formation
of the Local Agency Formation Commission a narrow extension of the
corporate limits of Seal Beach easterly of the Anaheim Bay waterways
skirting the Naval Weapons Station was, in ou.r opinion, illegal. To
compound this action still does not make it right.
JA1+LtS A, waEELtN DELrCRT Q. w1oNlrs `, �
AlAatrcw er •anlc waAct IIENNETH A. RtYNOLDf
MAMIt N. ARONtLLO �►••*Iw VIIICtNT ldt tMlt►
,
- o slatevoo WOOR!IOYfr
Now/IwMtR •IMtt*t+ � LIItt+YAN tlllt►, I 'La
M►wmy,
JONM ltLtttA «ΡtcoahilM t OLLIN C :UWL,AiW
t aJw.t tllltttaM
y W►LW�ti t/1t1C1�r1
r` .1 t
i
Local Agency Formation Comm fission May. A 1967
Page two
To avoid duplication of municipal services it would seem desirable that.
the Anaheim Bay-Sunset Day waterways continue to be a natural city limit.
The only means of access for safety services between Seal Beach and
Surfside is ,the bridge across the Sunset Bay waterways. A traffic
accident or heavy weekend traffic would isolate Surfside from all safety
1
services provided by Seal Beach.
Surfside has no common boundary with the populated area of Seal Beach.
The two communities are separated by a one toile military reservation
and a waterway. A took at the map, however, shows a common-boundary .
of 2150 feet between the populated and commercial area of Huntington Beach, ,
Coast Highway adjacent to the Sunset-Surfside area is presently patrolled
by three public police agencies and this annexation would create a fourth.
Present Seal Beach fire fa.illties are not within the accepted two mile
response area. Because of this distance and a substandard water system,
Surfside's 9-B fire rating is not likely to improve.
The Sunset-Surfside area Is presently served by a common water system
and a common sewer system, both of which are in dire need of capitol
improvement and expansion. The City of Fluntirgton Beach is presently
cooperating on plans for'the improvement and development of both the
water.and sewer systems'ns an integral+unit. To fragment the area b'
annexation'would only postpone and encumber this undertaking. The alty
of Huntington Beach has built water mains and a sewer system In Coast
Ilighwa adjacent to the Surfside-Sunset Beach area that have been engineered
to handle the capacities of these communities.
The City of Huntington Beach has been furnishing lifeguard service to the
Surf.side area for many years under contract with the County.
Economic forces will have a profound affect on the long range future; of
the Sunset-Beach-Surfs ide community. It is reasonable' to expect a, graduel,w
convereion•to`a very intense use of. the land for residential, recreational and
commercial uses From a community Service point of view that area` between
f
'the Santa Ana River and Anaheim Bay should be in the City of Huntington' Beach. ;.
Yours truly,
CITY OF HUNIIMTON.BEACH
yl Mil er
'
City dninietrator
DM:bwo
y.
1
x y,�fi 4,%.4�~ ( st _ _ � P _ :•��-•:�••�•ram•.. ••w•
.:� i �.' 'f '„ _i - - ••�•••�.••�•••�ram• ••••. �:•,
_; sue•"r•'.:Y• $._,I � '. - •• ••• •• •. •• •••
•jam 1•i•••�•.��•���•.�••.��::•'••
�n On
•..
�&.�;use,et ;'�;;�
o
t r .400. 0 .�••• �•
U.S. NAVAL WFA".9 STATION
is
lot
00
-06
000
.• .•;. j..• •.• .••
•�••• ••�•• •••: ,f• __ ••;mil. '
00
.00
rr ,• f` 1•^` �r00
0.
0.00
•• ••• •• •• •.��• •
Jrpl
oksa
vIl. 0•
• • •• • • ••
•-+• � 'T.> .� "1 r r rr• .�! � .r} .. � • -awl ••�• • •• ••••�•• •�•••.•�� V•• •••� .• 41I ,. .. r
so
OV
10 so
as
*00
to
�. �- • • • • •• • J'
\. Y it s• • •• •• ••M • • it 1L•,�• !• -
•t•~.:.. y .,"iaY„ t", •` :•es r'..T w I \w thy? ► ,J e v �i�/ii�lit� • �.�__ ••�. ••• •�
_ - •_ Z }`6.��'.'' •',yam[.•.+�i. •� ! }I �'. .. r _.1... •• 4«•• •'••• _• ♦.�f v.
-
__ _ -��: >,.� :wc� �.`�•-a.w.i�^�-,. +1 �y:( 4 .tx .x �•`. �.�.., .,i` _ a-: t 1_; � _ '�.-ti_�w�_ 1
W>:r c+ i y �•f:`,J<, q�.. ,r�,. � _ ♦�y., � -.t�� `!. Y-- ✓ •.�♦y♦. �� � _"1'�a t�.- _ ..'�.�.^..� '�
w �"L� 4. '♦.`..i.'t♦, i•a:_•L r .;Y.�_ J ~r= v- .. -. _ ..;.• n `�„ET - y' -...
a
r
ps- - s><:w'. .�.{s - •1'r. j sc `,i..i•' N��c K `k♦ Y ~:-._ ,� n _ _ _ •J•�.a••. -
� •.V-,� s y� ^•'�•k _ '.Y^ti ? .�.,.t-.AAu ,,.l.��y,r\"� .\.'v +r 1 •Y.��aG ` ► �••an••N _ -- -
' !r +r,• p 'F t, K..• - '4= �` ---'..•� �' ;ter t�•_i; '�.. i. +�'y '^ ,� +'".. 0#9000 A - -
�� �ii H Yid i i�•V�i4 MCB
� .3: ..r4 t ",.- . �" -.. slt+ar• \"I, _ •a Y. ?�Y "'r !•♦��tK '+�' �,�`a} •,•�r.••�
'I '' { •�� , *!{"r, `_ fir , r CITY OF SEAL BEACH
qt,q 4 S-.. ♦* a.. - r.I,,,Sy .�h.�st-; •ft'�" j"�`- �..,,� A' _ y�
• _, 1 ., ... . ,.. ,..,, .. .1..'.. _ ,.. .... -tuff ;t.
0
City of Hu ntington - Beach
X ,
nos *�. •rrrr.rr
1 P.O. Box Ito CALIFORNIA 02540
Evaluation of "Justification of Proposal" by the City of Seal lk-ach
Gene tat Comments
The most desirable natural barrier to provide separation between cities of.
Mntington Beach and Seal Beach, and to avoid duplication of servicea''appears
tube Sunset 13ay and its waterways.
The only means of access for safety services between .13"eal 816-3c;h and
SUrfsiU(: is the bridge across the Sunset Bay waterways . Congestion on the
bridge- hic to heavy weekend beach traffic or a traffic accident would isolate
' Surfside from all safery services provided by Segal Beach.
t Surfside .s sepwirated from the populated area of Seal Beach by One mile of
nillitary reservation anti a waterway.
Surfside has no common Wundary with v populated srva of Seal Beach. A
common houndary of 115) feet darts exist k-twe:en a populated and COITImercial
area of lluntingtan Beach.
The highway along the Sunset-Surf side area is serviced by three puhlic police
patrol agencies. The proposed annexation would create a fourth.
Present Seat (leach fire facilities would have to he moved one-half tulle
southeast to be within the accepted two mile response area. The present
level of fire protection would he reduced by the implementation of the proposed
annexation.
It may tw assumed that there is general agreement on those items that are not
ment foiled.
Item C. S. Proximity to father Populated Areas
Two thousand feet of the proposed boundary is adja;rent to the poTMated and
commerc:iai reav"6f ),Wi*tin ton Deach. 'Three hundred l ct�is adjacent to y
populated Sunstt,tlf.t�►ch and here is no common boundarywith a taupulated V
a rea of Seal Beach.
Item E. Governmental Services in Area
txclued intheuetfcalcxIwo major FiP/iccs have been e 0
1
2•
Water Services
The water system Is owned and operated by the City of Huntington Beach .}
Water Department.
Lifeguard St ry i cc .&;
The entire ly.-ach area is patroled and serviced by the City of Huntington Beach
I !arbors and Beach Department.
Item F. Need for Additional Governmental Services or Controls.
General Statements - Paragraph 2 and 3.
The Surfside Colony is .4e virated. from the populated part of Seal Oeach
by a waterway and one mile of military reservation. The only Incor rated
and populated Area that Is closely related to Surfside is the City of Huntington
Beach refer to enclosed map).
I
Police Protection
' The statement that Seal Beach provides police: "protection along the beach area
i and streets adjacent" to Surfside is not understood. There are no streets
adjacent to the annex that are In Seal Beach. Huntington Beach lifeguards
report never having seen Seal Beach guards east of the bridge. Also, the
only adjacent street is the long strand,of Pacific Coast Highway which extends
through the Naval Weapons -Stet icn.
The City of Huntington Beach ,currently provides police protection to the
populated area adjaccivi to Surfside and must travel through the proposed annex
highway to I)atrol their area . This has and will continue to create a,difficult
enforcement situation. The highway along the Sunset-Surfside sections
already has three puhlic police patrol agencies and there Is no need to create
u fourth.
I:ire Protection '{
Tile point that Surfside has a 911 Pacific hire Rating Bureau classification 'is- not
tt fire department issue. This pool• rating is caused by a subst�irtdard'water
:system. The fire rates could immediate! be dropped to a Sk classification yy.
If annexed to Huntington Beach and if our Water Department was pertritted {
to connect the city s water system to the Sunset Surfside system. �c
}The Clty. of Huntington Reath curren y'has a fire stetion'in the pcopooed '�
annex area. Three paid'men and'1000 gallon per minute pumper are
cont in►:Jue dut��. Accosodtng to g ch Fire Dep�erttnent;the Huntln ton .Bea ,
"Sea l Usch's'exlstin downtown fire,,statia►n ,wouId`have,to be:rnoved e-hal! +� ,
_mile east to be with ti the accepted two mile reepatae `of Surfside.
Park and Recreation ;, 1
LJfe �rd imrvices are currently t eing�proyided - the City o( Nuntin tcm Eie eh... . qua ,�:'
1 sand twenty four hour cai�ttidou�'1-he. evil o! ser..viCe`meets aril reckW id;staWei
year o Mod protectia�n is in tt� ire at atl times. �►
f 01
I f, 1 � 1• k hr7
t,
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS LIFEGUARD SERVICE
R
City of Huntington Beach city of Seal B"ch
1. Rescue Venee 18
t 2. Mobile Units
8 2
3. F'ulitloe Lifegunrdv 11 1
4. Seasonal Lifeguards 73 17
5. Average Daily Service (off season) 24 firs. 9 lira.
6. Average Daily Service (Julie-July-Aug. ) 24 two. 16 lira.
7• Minimum Available Peraoruaol '' •p
r '
'k
w
l
1 { .
•
a
I
Item F. 4. Alternative Courses of ction ,
The issue of the Elementary Sche�ol District tx�undary conflict i:; Off-set
by the fact that Surfsldv is In the Huntington Reach High School nistri,ct.
Land In iluntington lk! ach is avaliable and curre ntly zoned to provide ft
shopping center adjacent to Sunset and Surfside.
We que�tiun the sttetrme�nt' chat annexation to ancither city could present
boundary difficulties. Map reference and astudy of existing governmental
sLrvices will i llustrate: that ixxundary difficulties would occur if,Seal Beach
annexed this area.
Alternative, 3.
According to Orange_ County 's "Sunset Be ac.h-Surfside Study Technica l
Reports the sewer treatment And water service problem are extensive
and would k- costly to remedy. Trunk sewer and water lines hove been
engineer od and installed by the City of I iuntington Beach to handle i?oth
Sunset licach and Surfside. Only short Ltie connections are' required.
Thc iSsuC of-'sewer treatment is an iniportant point._ . "rho existing sewer
olak is -running near •q� pla�nt:�;
itCn► II , *i
The annexation will create an increase of S1. 2956 per $100 assessed
value for the rt!sidents of Surfside.
Item 11 , 12
Thuse statun)vnts should he looked at in the light of the information provided
in previous pages of this ret,;nrt.
Item I
Onlv one survicu organizntion and,,-or special taxing district will be eliminated
by the annexation.
1
,1 is
J115TWICATION OF PROPOSAL
To: WCAL AGENCY FOAMATION - COMMISSION
FLOM RON 503
C4 UI�lTY . DM TR ATI ON BU Yt.VINd
515: W."H� SYCAMIME STRUT
3ANTA ANA CALIFORNIA
MAILING ADDRESS
P. 00 BOX 838
SA14TA ANA, CALIFORNIA
FROM: City of Seal Reach
California
SUBJECT: JLSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
TITLE OF PROPOSAL Annexation 67-1
A. GENBAAL
1 . TYPE AND DESIG14AT10N JP PROPOSAL: Annexation of
inhabited territory to the City of Seal Beach@
2. STATU".VRY PROVISIONS GO'CERNING PROCEEDINCS :
Annexation Act of 1913-inhabited territor
3. THE REASONS FOR THIS PROPOSAL AAA, AS F%-OL O-04� : ,
Refit by property owners and voters within area
�.F.cMpet to be annexed.
+w•w�.�r•.r..ter. <- :..1
It
' , e
f
f '
JOTIFICATION OF PROPt'ldAl, r
s. FWSICAL `P"CATUR&S
1. LAND AREA: 3Q11AI 'r NZLtS .07 ACJ�:S 44 -
Z. STATS atNERAL MCRIPTION OF TOPWAAPHY: octLou_g. :.�Ir
south of Pacific Coast Highway is pmoral12 flat, baach aroa
adjacent ' to Pacific Ocoan; area north of Pacific Coast
Lijhway is marsh tidal land.
3. DESCRIBE "NATURAL" BOUNDARIES : (RIVERS, YOUNTAINS
i,` ZEWAYS, ETC. ?
The 2roposed annixa tion is bounded on the south .bZ the
ac c 0cLa.n, eortUM o_g ,t*norther ,bq pr4„dma As �..
the Pac i i-le Coast Ri hwa .
4. DESCRIBL DRAINAGN BASINS, RIVERS, FGDOD COhiROL CH: NNE.- L,
STC.
:he area north of Pacific Coast Hay is a marsh tidal area
+.r�.i... . ......�.r....�..�.rr .r ■ r �..�1 Wrr..�r.�...a.wr.•.•r..wwrr.��.
ad scent to a water Tray connecti�► Anaheim LandinN ans the
ro osed 4911atiV _„Dark - The arqL sputh- of Pacific _Comet,,_
Iliglmay drains generally to the adjacent FacifLe Desan.
a. D&SCRIa MAJOR HIGHWAY ACCESS TO THE AMA :,
Zhe pEMsed annexation is serwod RrLmAril-y by the Pacific
1
Co. POPULATION AM RELATED KATTERS
1, POPULATION IN SUBJECT AWA
` ixatoly375
P'CM ATZoK iNt ITY ( I,E.. PER SgttA�tE MIt"o MR AQU. ? c
"'1ss dg"JtX of thg rest4ential araa`o�i i• a ca xi ►t al
&6 ear it
I
,I
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
3. NLWU OF MUSIMRED VOT1it3 s.i 1. "roxima toly 107
4. NUMBER OF VWLLING UNITS : �JZ6
5, PROXIMITY TO OTHER POPULATED AREAS :Sunset beach an
ti:»inco rpora ted area of !pproximatel 1, 100 �is ,.adjac*nt l to:
11c eas , VbYtrdns ot Me GICY e; Huntington e e are aea�,
.
` Co the north east, the City of Seal ' Beach is .&dIacent to the
..Ir�+�+.�rr • -W r r�. .�. I■Il.rt �I��Y _0.�..rr 1
West .
o. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN POPULATION IN
' INEXT 10 TEARS -.As the area will be zoned R-1 and is of high
density for that zoning classification, ft is notlikely that
c ere will be and► sieificaht increase in population in the
■Fr ■ .. .rr.rr�. •. ■r.��+.1�Yri11�� Y �11_I�Y�..� 1�iM+•.
next 10 years .
7 . LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN ADJACENT AREAS
IN NEXT 10 YEARS :
A. IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS :Small gradual increases in
h
population m8ywtake place in the Sunset Beach area depending
[ Wwr r�. �+� .1.��.._ . �.r.■� ■Y.�r��rlr.l.�l/Y. ..r..��... .■_
rt
tutur ._land usP p ens as they may be. approved by t_he
F -overnin aRen�Y
b. IN INCObOAATED AREAS : `me City of Seal Beach
:ro,jections are for a population of 459000 by 1985 within
;resent corporate boundaries.
i
D. ECONOMIC FACTORS
1 . ZONING AND RELATED MATTERS :
A . DESCRIBE TM EXISTING LAND USE IN THE AREA WHICH:
:3 THE SM ECT OF THIS PROPOSAL.Approximecely . 5 acres are
!evotaid to coo erci►al uses ; there is approximately 21 acres of
beach area much of which is privately owned; approximately approximateLy Ai.2
acres is devoted. to uses • the rmainRg ac re►ata- xs
rtes 3den'tia �
- � �
in streets, vacant or undevelop" land.
s E;
•
CA'l= OF RNOML
,. DMIL =xlarINO 2014 Y!W t;l��reaiftntial__area is
r
iNUdd.. ..- Cb1 ca�arc LAI gi Q a ._
C. DUCRIM PROPOSED NEW ZONING QR CHANGES IN ZoING,
IF ANY:
It is .g lanned that the rosidept ihl area wL11 be Boned K•1
r�Y�:,_. .._.d�._.._._.r..��_•_...._�.. .i.._..rir■._ .rr�r+.:�.r•..__ .mow+
the-cc�@C*ial area C-2 the railroad right of way laced
in an interim acme and the rmalning beach or tidal property
to a uumn
Z. ASStSSIW VALU19 IN AREA :
A. LJ1lms_..,__......._._..._ 793A.340 _.�_._, .... ■�...�.._._.._._...�
B. 114PROVZKEM 195 5b0
Total
C. AMOUNT OF PUBLICLY LAND IN AREA :��_,acres
exclusive of beach and streets .
i
3. AMOUNT OP SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA : `Notin excess
of 41.000.
rr.■ .■arw�.rwr■rwF • r r ■�r■r�wr.++rn■.w ■ ��.r r�■+rw
Ir
E . GOVTRNMENTAL SERVICES IN ARE. : (DESCRIM IN Ukw%* :
AS IS;. APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA THE EXISTING CO'Mn,i;41::T
SERVICES AND CONTROLS IN THE AREA INCLUDING, FOR . EXAS-41K2,
POLICE PEtOTECTION) FIRE PROTECTION, HEALTH S::RVICES,
GARBAGE AND TRASH COLLECTION, LIBRARIES , i'i+RK.S `i NJ ?LAY-
0AOUHDS, SEWSRS, STREETS, STREET LIGHTING., *ETC.' )
•...�€aa Istc-hedyaite 4a.
rI
7
' I
E. Covernwtntal Sdrvices In Area
Puiica Pro tecU.ons Count SherLff s lwaantod b rivo
YP Y ? to
patrol
F. .r . Pepte tii°.n: County Fire Departarriit, voluntoer station
III Sunset Leach.
it_;ae% Collection: Sunset Sanitary District provident for
this service.
Strc vLs Streets within the colony are owned and maintaLned
as prLvate streets ; Pacific Coast Highway is a atate highway.
is Service : Orange County Health Dvpurtment,
Libre: Orange County Library branch in Seal Beach 's
;iu ers and S� evam Treatment : Sunott Sanitary District, .
General Government: Orange County.
Su-rsida Storrs Water Protection District : Beach erosion and
maintenance.
Surfside Community Se vice District: Legal services, entrance
•rAr���Mnr
gate, etc.
. I
4a. -
. K
JUSTIFICATION OF PROMAL
R.' N= PO ADDITIONAL GOYEANMIENTAL SERVICES OR COI:TROLS :
1 , DESCRIBfr:_THOSE GOVERNMENTAL, SERVICES OR 0,`,TROV-jI" CH
SHOULD BE PROVIDED W}iICH ARE NOW NOT PROVIDED ON `aHICH ,
SHOULD Bi PROVID9D IN INCREASED' AMOUNT IN 11a; AMA.
See e e 5A.and SB. .,._
2 . ESTIMATE PROBAHLE P1,717RE thEED ' OR +lEw nR !XC81z,;SLD
GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROMJ ;ti 7'F.E AKA.
It LA S p ry L r..Jex eLs.,._.C!Q ah1 e
to those provided other areas of the city_ Would be sufficielzt
in thy: foreseeable future considerin_&__the development of the
nrea as an R:: io;—eg territory.
3 . DESCRIBE HOW YOUR PHOPO;A L KEM-7.a THE !;:. I3 4h irii Yc. j
HAVE DESCRIBED IN PARAGHAPHS P , i ana 2
In outlining the needs in Paragraphs F 1 and 2 above, the
proposed method of meeting the needs are also outlined.
4, WHAT ALTERNATIVE COLrtSES OF ACTIO:.' EX:ST P3R
Ta NEED DESCRIBED ABOVE? DESCRIBE AND EVALUATE
See page 5C.
0 . WHAT REVENUE WILL YOUR PHOPOSAL REQUIRE F Orl 71LE
MENT OF ITS GOALS AND WHAT ARE THE PR3SPECTIVE SOL"Rk:.Z' Oi'
SUCH REVENUE?
See pags 5D.
i
�,
Hued Ett.�� �tdd .tioaal l'�over �: rnCl Servl.rc�� and— Co�nt=uls :
dove sYtmisn t : y ;V .n � ' 'ft�e Clt of Scd1 f Bch°`is .c ,char`urod
city`, with a' fitv�s''tnetnba Gt L5 Gouctcil el�crc:d y ��
' , . _f o'c feu c a, r
ov4!r1a in terns b dlstricrs un�i a cou ec.it rw'ti'14�,- '
p8 Y t r `fd n,1
of ;Z,over'nment. The 5 meribcr plattining, commission is ' appa nLed
r iox• lout! year ,a��erl�rppie�g t��rm:c- by the C1. ty Cou»cit . ;fie
•�nnr�xalill t'lo:�isr}Yc:c'less
b than
ibetc Vocop�t id��ad iabsv f ram�r�ocp`v.iei ed
e y ih t . r 1 more. „nti .n tt for
axc.a
+ ftjia ,
rraidcnt$ of the in handling of 1ck.al b ovc.rtuaental
matters affecting their area. Many of the problems of the
area , iourticularly in the field of Zoning, are si.-nilar to
those of area's currently in the City and therefore could
receive locall.x*d attention.
As the proposed annexation area is ;iimiiediately adjacent to
the city Any development, growth and/or lack of, dove' gamer r
will affect, to no" excent, the rma nits?; portions of
city , particularly any developments that will occur Within,
the city for t ►e city s sphere of inAu' unce:) in the: south-
easterly area Af the city .
It is contended that the representation provided by a city,9
governmetit would be more responsive to local nveds,,-And chat
a combination of city representative and county supervisc,rial
representation would 'be beneficial to the area proposed to be
annexed.
R _;C
Police':Pio Lee t�ibn : Presently poll,ce protection is provided
along beach areas and streets adjacent to the r`roposcd
annexation. The size of, the area &lid population would not
{ seemly impose an ,undue -burden on the prLsent police
,:s oaost of the beach area in private property and restricted
by the layout of the residen_isl area from extensive use ,by
.:.ie general public, it is not anticipated that beech 'Crowds
,. ..11 present a problem.
a
3_y having a police station within two miles , . an a lequaCels
v,rnncd department including sufficient patrol scr6nbch, ;the
amowit of patrol time devoted to the area wilt undoubicdl
be increased and 'thetrteby enable the colony to cither dispense
with or reduce the uve of private patrol services .
Sa.
- ♦.l py+la-z t'1!« f.i` e:'c.:_ r,. -t' tt .. .{. s,j. �"r.i,K:asaafi�.r►.n.:avt li } .'y. t1-.�-:� ::.,ty.,,,. ....._._. _..
•r f ` I f�� , *,r ' ;j1tt';yry,,
Meodr for hdditi+ h .�o acrir�eat rl starvilies all d co6trols' 7Cdopt�dS �s
err t ' at+`
lie tia ioet ''(o ''
r� :ICE 11rj,l t. !Sr �E r� .�.,�� rf� •,�7..�• .. � .r t' .1
'' olityrwill` alaof enfant traltit ragulaeions ,Mithin rthwE.
. l y +A� �+t r - ' I 'i l t'• �( ,,... .. rt i, 1 err 1 7 ioi "the prive ►a a'brotets : In :r�i�grdancG. ha - to, on , s �ar ,with t Sty ,
VahiolsE�(C*"'1 rs yi offer a p�arvial volution to the
aroa` p4iiA;�►i�- psublews. J;
The, r r•r bn�tl class,
Nx�o+Ceeti � set fs;.cu �'` �'� d a� H
y.r, in bureau. for ia�su ,,r, , ,
� the f Pac is `p , .: .'" ,.,. .�.�� . r ,,i
_: , - ire Rat. y : • ,, , r��cQ purposes,
,
This i i a Va mde�iYable. rati�� land iardiesate� 'need far
i>rrcr+rrurod fLee preteationl and five' datinse ivica=. 7 ,,
picQGent oorriWW are provided iiy ''a voluntasr fire fiahtiisd
" f ore,
l
The'�Cft ofE Seal Reath hi-s/ion -Dider an aeriel' latf m ii
61.1 el�) tkik and an midi ti�,�mr' 'J� l r Sri R P
which` together with tha� c�i.ty' s , t�nre• 1`,tZOe spa -pLW"rs
at d,,other equipment, provides c oinsidarable ilaxibility
iii fire ,fighting *pparatus
4"' `f17 1'JF7` '4• ,l�'+�+ H! �I'1'i 'r J I� 1 E
p
cit has,siniti+►tadtcaua, of �C�rfi,iti fireda
»at.. .TF
wLCh "full, tioue proresatio�ial lira fidhtind.,persortincl., It , is 'r
untie pitad t t ha the cc�' eyny/,r;t4h Lei h° will b
' e fvr the prapased annexation Jirea will be, s taf fed wi th full `
time persoannel vi.thin 'apy#roz'i»�itely ii and "w l b" ''1 lrea i 1 o f thi �''
third full time fir g ;,' y ,
I
��� i Ei t�►tin c an . . "Sec�rid ic " '�reeponsa
Could be provided by 'a eom"iny with full time personnel: ?
The prn?osad anaexi►tior► artill` is within- 'r"f." 'mile, riinninr I
distance of -the aint rei nse,:0fire c � any as recommended . ,, '
b the American lnsurancs Association (National board t` �y �f
Fire Underwriters) for residentail areas.
There . is littler doubt .therefore 'that the prosent fare 'r
E Lhti> g capabilities willIl be satiewh4t improved ourrerptly
and that . over the amiceediin ears the service r.i ll n ro e i �
8 years, P f�
subs taiittially.
.�,���
Park �andr Recraatioln': The 4are' a1,s basic rec feat ion''�!ar►'o is ,
�
each frar.,a j botk private JIand, publically ownco, hc. ,c
. , .: T, i cy� i�c�'uld �
be responsible ' far life'swird� service in; tnc` pU61' 'ica14, Own I
i if !f d
areas and would staff ihe''area with peirsonne' l durin;i : trio aua+mer
sad- provide raving' checks- duirinR the xiaCar sesrsoet This
follow the basis fattera of current $arwll 0e8.
a
Sb
•1 r I
/'�t FFi ,r1 . lL �, t ,.. F/ I�'• ,� }�� t7i t !', s1
altok%A ivai�►a7'C+I r£ r ���i .}i M.'R���t��f ) ri '�f + 1{ .t
eoursei 6f actionti! exist for meetiog the
i Woad dascc+ibidah►a r : ; I'/g(�(
•nA,1`,.'%d�!•'ilYrw'1 .b �lrAW
]N� . . , . .0 '1"he 4xP pro�wa�ed to be1�ant�axsd t t ;' 7 IA yr < :�rrajtrs'iwe tet
Seal, deaeh� s#i►.iht b fannexod to thor,.city.
4.7im 4�- lflR"i� � y,r 1tJ• ,.cs ,, k t a1 ` ' )
1 Cvaluataon . prcp��ir� nta tutwliat� .nic�tod
or..,Wil i. ne s'tv be an��u eci
�'+ nr a /> X '.tw th- Lr oth r; #A htiorins
a i rY�: ra�"M�/ae� "axiitiexzti on, area ::iw,,vitliii'n the '�;�ieal
k3each Xlementary Scliaol O atrict and .thta residdnts� of
the :a ton 4 tend to dw' much o f tha Chopping in.. Sea i d6Ach.
A ,po"it tio►ti 'of 'the area is botunded on the': nail tli _bY :Cal
' 'nnnaxi�t3rx�' to anocher city could present
b0Un`dak' di ffieu1 ti'e'a.
A1terrnative` Xncorporation. t�y f
� l r.•, /A t;lr ti' 1. "�IVr4'' '� � 7,,' •1�.,
r
Evailu.�tion: Co"' etely ii aulticiunt' tax vase icven wha�n
.:.}' ,t ., fIT < = +l h I 7¢ «'14. .+ ,^ ,. �.
coKr�bined �rrith other nearby unincorpor�atad arca: .l,
3 . A1t rnativa: Remain''^an 'unineorpo'cated t t6erttitory
t # ,
Evaluation t ,'/ 'The^ proppnenta cidntenw that` governmental'
� sarvicas vould:b'e� ac%i%aIICCd`' uy' a local :j�owerr6piit wich;�
f;
' the�4 'repceeon'tlation4?of a lvcally3 �el.ected council; Zoning
� ! �r •,.. `: �Y ► ♦r yea?
rct s
Y1. �'r,•
l��s could receive consLiieration b an a en faced. .
i Frith sisiilar problmras in adjacent areas , By,�.,cdnsolidaCi�g
woxik forces with thi cityi, 'cos C to:: tti'c Colon.y.� for
St cat ari'd betach iri'trincinea could ba - reduce-d,' ; Mie
ressF ident s of thee . area appear to recognize tlia t +tiere is',
a need f or smartie ipal t' u services and d6s i tv to: have,,all
' op?ortunity tv determine the city.-a:f• their chdice'. It,.is
' re'cogniI ed that` in arriving at solutions to; sewer treatiaent
and ,water service problems, the assiitatncc of a mu`nicipali''Y' s,
staff would be helpful even though this financial p rob 1ems
' are handled by the annexation area.
j
1
l
3s. .
�
it�Yt 'f , r 11 ''° ',1 �.�ir e. �- 1`r'! �f�'- t { f
��/ .��j�t + !J!r �of + � ' <. ��;�� ,.1 T ���J�. , � C�lr r•:I
. ;i�►"ltat ovrrnue M111 lis veur 'pro osa
pl; pu�ro Par ,'Theii �aaaq hr�a�,
!' Of xis' Co►als A rd Wtrac Arai Pr poe tiva $o+.tise •� of �uoh'
i '
It is':>Got ii"r «that the city mmId' rec ivf thf. Eolloarie� ,
� iiWi revinwa
t' 1. Pr�pe'rty,`Ti�xss lx 00'
1. Hot or Vehicl In Liv4
andGA
s 'Taxes 4; 1 70
' 3 . Salieii s%j'Tax sao .�
4. &usinea• LLes"ae• 7�
Total $TY"Im
Jit Is *$tin. atiid tha"t ' the citywould ex nn 'the `fclrlowi
mounts Annually;`
I Lifeguard '4ervic4. 3,�►�0`
Z. Polici (pca'ration ai costs) 5 ,000
3. Beach Cle`anr Up and �. :.
o ratl Malptrnance 5 000
pe ona 1' ,
4. Coaneral 00.4irmrM 3 OOU
Total 161030r
•, : ,.,.tf ,. .�7:`ti,.. .; r!\4. ti,.td,�:! v} i ;;!'1+. i+rJ ,
j It is anticipeted,,.that charges for. building .paM is sind
simLL& r itirua v i ►d ba of 6ii by c l i'r' expend l.t'i ran .*
beach erosion coatis and prablees, wou' ld continue tof'be �.
haWled by "the SuifeWe Stoi;.* water Pirotietim Diztriot .
I '
'
r
•
t '
r ;
JOTIPICATION OF MOP''OSAL '
. He 93TIMATS :TO THE BEST Or , YOUR 'ABILITY THE' ErF'zCT OP THE
FROMAL ON t tl'
1 . CO3T 00 00VER."11- Ni'-AL SEhVILES "AND CONTRI), a
,
Cor oukli nil; oE arsjor cr�rt.g:; of regiiired additionjj1 novc+rn-
�/ mantel services and coirtreil i .
p tc
ADEQUACY OP, ,GOV'aA,.�•.r.�TAL SERVICrr.S 'kr+D CO,TO"LS.,,
anntxationWr+auldenable th r
e a r,a to receivr � additionzl .:iire
rill
ainiipol cs�, 1,",Lyist tiflnro ,dqit *7 ptpY.it;_� Mr }:'s:c.,....
unin'corpara�red t"erciGorr• witl�out t,hct creAt,ion & n c•n:;Iva
F ecit&li,�s'ervice`vdisrrictS . lic, 11�L �
n re reoentat on: at t - ocnl , •overt z�ntal
MUTUAL 'SCiCII+L AUD 'ECON0-MIC Ipo
•.., 1 annexation area:. is withi the Seal iie��ch E` mcntary N
Districts the area uttlizei the .6by y .b nn :' �X.. Cba
City, of Seal Beach. Seal Beach also providvi- the c los"aat
r-th �1 .mA . is t n a r.w c -J Q U.fA t4ii r- •�O�e�i---
Surfaide and the City of Seal Beach are concerned wlch the ,
r
4 , LOCAL GOVERNS NTA L STRUk"PTVRE OF THOE COL-11'�'Y._,�,„� �__•__,�
See Page 6A
I • TIB z NATURE OF TKE PROPOSED CHANGE: 0= �t�li.A`:IZi,i:Gig. OR; F
:. ON AND Mrz. NA", ' OA t; V.'•LS OF ALL �DISTii!CTS.,AN-J/
1tEti�tCllhlxA'�I ,
Oft' CITIES FOR KHICh T}:z CHANGE. 0? OrtGA:iY7.,1TI0ti aq r "Oif%AIV-
IZATION 13 PROPOSED ARE AS FOLLOWS :
The County Structssral. Fire Protection Disi rict Is the onl
rr .r A.i ���r• .r. �
service ar anisaition and/or epeci 1 taxingdistrict, � kc
xin wh1."� h
will be .elemimted
•
�.,..�- +{f.� � { { ., � f. ' ('.;it Iry t,,v f s(�,F: • ^ti.• 1:':
} Kf r.rt a "� .. e ',1) t � 1�, � � {� 1r• , Y ',.r} t'• 1,1 .J:.. J )''.Q'�
r•.r..+.++.r 1 �� � ; �, � 'f t + 11 1 +J 1 �;� �fj
",q
e
y
;,p1 � i:-,i;.v. �.•:� „�f .,;; .'�
4. fatal Covl+as ntal structure of thi, Ctvnty. f - �+
�h Y l ad' a n ion a eta. io', a: p�:ct, of Supo rrrl�cia�► :,
irtriar Nuibec f and the lollowieig aPOcial taxiwj diitrLttt
County • Library,) ,
coupp y,-!noa- cod tco1 ,G.
Ca�untty �•IAiboi:,:01atri�t
County'Mo•quita->Ab t nt pi rict
County 'Ste tural lrire Protection
Orange County MOWO D
W 'D; z
•.4iS• +{n Y.'.`'-y t 7PI It�
.1
Hun tinstoh :UAC High, S 6661
! Seal `gtecA IE1"e�nirototY gclicnnl
• .�, lip; }•1 .. �f
(*ange.',C�Wst Juiiir Calltga ,
Sunict 5ani"tiiy Oi trio ;
Swr f o Lido Colony
try Comma i ty �Service pig tric r
I
Surfaide Colony Starve water hirotaction Doi met
R
i -
T
att"Ift"" "m MAIM
"a' ON= ' w Ate. o"" Mum Oal i i i CIr!`� AM .
E. ANY 91A C NOW MHICM YM MR '['0 IAA:
irrr 7r»
f
L6 O twconrwm pop POMATIOM PXOPS§1►L
1 . SRYIM AM MUM 110ABCTS► TO RE PROMO BY :-*.,
MOFOUD AOMNY IN rIMST UM SECOMD YEAR OF OMRATION :
2. PROPMD NDM Fm mw TWO'- YEAR i OR AGENCY'S
EXI3TENAZ. , rATTACH FROPOUD aUDOET SHUTS AS EXHIBIT.
"A" TO, FROMMD UQUILST.
3. 9STI A TAX, RATE FIRS' T Two YEARS OR' AGENCY'S;
NXISTSNCi. ;ATTACH TAX RATI PRONSALS AS EXHIBIT "C TO
FROPOUP MQU9ST 0
M. AL'!'!M'!'i4 TO PROVIDINO S=VZCES 0TH9R THAN BY
I1i1 =PMATION M PMATIOiI
- •. L • -.w ., r • r•_, r_r s• •.. .Ms'� '��I^�r .1.��'.s •� • '♦ 1 'r. / .I 1 � Y•/�
i
SS
;� s` ., _ r s:.v,. •c, 7 ''
. . . Surttida Co aC
have" or.a` i i t of Soil �boieth
totleC
y nd t bt o ooaiosri� enie E i t to' the' Ci't
#ar�4A, direr t' k
and m' .,?*ran remU19 in ar deCic�it `for: a' rtodi,.of _ 0 e# '*
r..
Y
ovdr ,thi on* 1 Sri ern
_� rut►, as CI1 ��la rea -:�luva o*s iiod r ii fib' ' V- •
{ lh . gyp+ars vr ywhe , bacause of currtn land, prices)
ea ! the h5urfs
advsnta ide Colony area would result in an
terous t�na to C i t;y.
T7� r,proponent are will�ng ''tor providi 'solutio" to-waur r,
theiir 'area , roils iocludin off •treed �arkirtr -- n �'�:�r
tit g d cJon, jag
r p 8 ,
'le' ta4 property, held, i y e �aCafE. t,
t n caatnon, .,but e� ncc.d r th
as$istanca o! :a ici - y x,
taut ptrl,ity! +to,.achisve;`thi •alutions r: They,
are also willing to continua the : finaarc al' �uppart:`"of :correctxni
the,b" erosion problew aid th r by par , to iarpoae'' the pc blern
CM City in go, wal, in order to up grade their ciwiu ity.
it is their belief, however, that it: can be accomplished ea_:fey
and faster by working with a municipality.
The colony is also desirous of maintiin n� its;priviit:e wn'. �x
r 11Qd-in
community. The City. of Seal 1lsach has "had experience with this
type of cosnunity within the City (Leisure World - Seal. Leach) .
it is requested that the proposed av asxation be approved 44
submi t terd%
c i r
} .r' }M .fir «.ti�.►,�,�'
r
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPWAL
1'1 SUfIMxT ADbiT1ClNAL I'tFORMATIOl1 M'NICiI MAY I!R 0F YALtIE .TP3
Tim COWISS ION TM REACHING "1918 CRC[RION ON SKPAXA'i4
i It�TS.
N. WTICES OW COMMUNICATIONS AWARDING "a 'RO°ON*h CHANGR
SMALL At DIIINC= TO THi POLWVINC MAX11CM)`:
NAIL Lee Kisnerl - -City nn4gr TSL��'HO1dIi , ►31- �3?7 _._,�,.
ADORL i its .Hall
•,_
NAME Philip 14tt'nc*urt TELgmfow 431 7527
ADOMM Citj Na11 ww_ CITY S4a1 Astsh. raU L ?40 _
NAM9 TEW PHONE
ADDOW CITY
' ,� f'�w1MM1YIMM/krrU Mwra.. u..�wMM'MM1V� ..
M3w M� yh.•.�,yJ ■ i;q •1i i' 'If \�•_ �71c,'l ♦V tl�l'`•■ .1., ac Y� f ,+_ l ?7.J 11n ti `t 9r.Y ;.iT,^, 1'Is .qI r� 11r,♦
,. i� 1 w�•'�I tt �,f ��•i} •� 417�
r,7.y��,t? +` 1�':�i}�1�'4� ;�:..-,t,�t;���,t•j;; ,i e,f. ; ,.f:.
f�
i � ;♦ 1 1 �{ /r� � 9 � t!f f7! ..: L 4 �♦�� 1 11 - ��Q
` �` r '� � .i'f . fl! �' } , +',i'?a.�t'1�1,�,�_�5ir 1.J�L'4 1 r •r S�,
ti
1 ,�
.� 1 t101N ae�'
�1114
'�, �AMT /1�'NAI�IIiAMf� -',tom`-•
NOW
� t. 'ter • � ;' ':` , 7.
LOCALA4tMCY fOAMAYI COMMI6iIOM
■ IAprai 19
r. ; fta t:LMton beach
1 190
MMUnston Beach, California
wI�.L1A11'r.MAlttMl -
L
-city, of 1»• Attentions Paul Co Jones, City Clerk
CHARLSS A.PEANUM
dal�.wlt Gentlemen:
tice,=1s hereb` ive" that aubl
.i,.. ''f�_,
, NilT be
Na 4 y.�, 6 P, is - h�at�it�g
` awto L. Iu►11 tR ,
hi d.,,by 'the_. Local Agenoy,: Formation COsaiiia a o sion f
L Orari$e; County ..on JU7' 1967 e► , s`00 OX*
't is.wA di.Nie� , -�`
in':Room 543 Orange County Administration Butilding`,'
I %5 North'Sycamore street, Santa' Ana , Callfornia on"
C,M:/tATNRRLY the proposed r miiation t o the City of !liar 811a►Qb
s.0 twit" deiibnated its Annezation�No. 67-le
/i�at �IIAMN
ya,y truly yours,
LOC�.
ss011�� �.MdNOLd AGENCY FORMATION COh4rI153I0N
a.AO "we
Rlcr`
Alt+" N�w rd ,T. Turner
MILLIAM MIRSTtIM r.
f.,.�.la.. Executive officer
fwri $"&Mgt
AIMw.ir •
t,
iL�NN R _MA4TRR: " ,
AICHARD T. TYRg1111ceowo
do
t
■ ..-,-......_....eu.�t.Yw��arWrY�._.._ __ �"2'~�1�a.Lae�t�ai�i.W11�.A'— i� — ( _,+.?"� ^��•
-
., 2
t• r. 1. X a q;1kO' M lllevt ed bt�rieb . lill?
3 Beginning at the intersection opt iiw Wert 1� of the 'jkd usiU t! 1r/g�r r•;� ,`
3 of section 13, Township '5 South, Rang 13 West, R. B, fit., .in the ty'ot •: t
1
4 Orange., State of Californir, with the Northerly r of Location Not- 141
Stato Tide Lands, described in Patent issued April 4, '1901, said Laterseotion
3 6 being also the point of ,
:y S � begin ��5 of the legal description of Itaaexatiaer No, z ,• '` '
7 to the City of Seal Beach, 'California, thence sloeg The boundary lope of said
1
6 City, S 8?6 301 L 11489 14 feet, 3 :3? 461 B n04.26 tees and"S 520 451 a
319, 01 feet to an angle point in the Northerly line of the boun" Una of the
+� 10 City of Huntington Beach, California, said boundary line hayhng been r
established by Sunset Beach No. 3 Annexatioa in Ordinance No. 1053 of said' .
• iZ City of Huntington Beach; thence leaving said Seal Beach boundary 1!n• and
13 along said Huntington Beach boundary line, • S 46" 331 00' W 130. 2�fee',
14 N 438•38' 07" W,A0. 00 feeet, ' S 46. 33' 00" W 53. 76 feet to a awl-tangent curve
• 15 concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 5844, 00 feet, Southeasterly aloas
16` said curve 150. 69 feet, more or lose, through a central angler of 1. 281 4511,
17 N 58. 00' 00" W 50. 39 feet to a non-tangent curve concave Southwesterly and ' f,l
18 having a radius of 5832. 60 feet, Southeasterly along said awvve 104M feet; :+
19 more or less, through a central 4ngle of 1. 031 37", tangent to said curve
30 S 4311 281 00" E 05. 0? feet, and N 46. 331 00" E 5e 00 feet to the most Weatoriy
31 corner of the boundary line of said City of Huntington Beach as established by
r '
33 Sunset Beach No. 4 Annexaticg�g Qrdinanee Now IIII,of said City at
33 Huntington Beach; thence along last mentioned boundary line and leaving said
24 Sunset Beach No. Z Annexation S 43• 38 l On" B 944. 44 fret to the most
35 Westerly corner of the boundary line of said City of Huntington Beach' as .}
38 1 ,,.establishad by Sunset Beach No. l Atiaixation in;�dina�e-ltoo 933 of said
27 city of Huntington Beach; thence leaving said Sunset Beach No. 4 Aiinexatift
28 and along said Sunset Beach Na. .1 Annexation S 430 280 00" ,B 100A0 test to ' 1,7
BB-3326 rWR=ern �
f+-, IP s\ � � !� _�, '--r�'_�—__ I, r ,` r ,7 F/ r' �r� t}• .1•t r 1 11 {, 7•�! t.`i
y
ii
-
.1,1 rI !
rf vr1k } f+� , 11• , - -' '��'1 + 7'' , , , •� •1ti ,y1�Y
•
-
I`I t r 1., 1 � ' 't ' ' ; -. 1 ♦ 1 � � � ', ,S' _'-►It In Y�{ �jt ����
t
.17• i �(}F. il�r,..)�,Yy.,fr*��,,,S M. , •4 / 1+"r,�11 "t.,i, , 1 •,• •tx+' t• l':}l:i .j�. +`,j + +.fir +,��•l.�,rw, ...1/ ''i�j�
�. . `FDESCRIPTION 'Oh` ANlJ'EX TION NOO '•7.1 1 r t`41
,
,
-• TO 'Y'� Ci'C'Y' �!' �AL�
i ,• 1' Rivlsed March 31, 1867 ,f� ?;►
tangent curve concave Northeasterly baviag r radtw► of 047,00 feets
3 ' Southeasterly along said curve 288, 41.feet, more ox lose, through a aenitral A
4 angle of 17' 51, a8",, leaning said 'amme N 240 30'' 00' W 119' 70 bet.to a aoq` sf
'
tangent curve concave Northeaiter ha►vli a' 950t ,00
•. 5 g �Y a' ..� radius o[ 050� 00 tfet mod'being ;. . .
(r
g' concentric with said Os7. 00 foot radius curare, Southeasterly &Img eiid 'i 1
7 050 40 toot radius , r S
• r curve 100: 2b feet, more or less, through • aeatral Ya
;{.
g of 6+ 021. 48", tangent to aaid curve S 66' 521 00119 215. 02 fiat to a tangent
curve concave Southwesterly having a radius of 1060, 00 feet, Southeaster),
10 along said curve 50. 07 feet through a central angle of 20 45' 18" to the sort
f
' 11' Southerly corner of aaid Sunset Teach No. 1 Annexation, said corner being ,
12 on the common line between Rancho La B61sa Chica and Rancho Law Alarnitosi
13 thence leaving said existing boundary of Huntington Beath S 48. 261 00" W ,
14 alon said common line and its Southwester) rolon ition.3.miles, more or.
• less to the Southwester) boundaryline of said Coup of Oran e'; thence
16' Northwesterly along said Southwesterly boundary to the Southeasterly boundary
17 line of the territory incorporated under the name of the City of'Seal Beach by
18 order of the Board of Supervisors of said Orange County on' October 25,
19 thence Northeasterlyaloe last mentioned Southeaster boundary,UAQ S,mils "
20 to the intersection with the North-South quarter section line of Section 240 ='
21 Township' 5 South, Range 12 West, S. 73. M. , said intersection being an le,
f.
22 point in last mentioned Southeasterly boundary Una; thence continuingal6ag
sa id Seal Beach bounds line Norther along quarter sect
23 boundary �Y � Q iaa lsnes to tt>R
24 Southwest corner of the territory annexed to said City of Sea
l Beach '
25 'September, 1928 per Seal Beach Ordinance No. 148,' said corner being on•tbii
26 Southerly line of Electric lAne; thence Southeasterly aloaS th* Southwesterly
. . 27 line of �last mentioned annexed territory to the Southeasterly corner thereof./
28 Mina also the intersection of the Easterly prolongation cif Maid Southerly U�► "I.
f! ,
- A
1
• r
t,y' '�' .11 , • ^. 1. . ' . ! ' fit. .r rt., �.�
v
/ 1 � � ;. , - .•+' 'l t` r . ,fir.
'1 � .�.�! •., }•.� , rl�t t d�!" 1" ,`.r �ltf�'`.-„ 7 ( .�'Y � :, -, if =., .:-..{ , ......,� %:� r � �1
DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION. No* -41-*I' O T`HZ CT TOY $KCAL FlAC#L
rcb'31 I967
of Eleetric Lane w"Ith"the Westerly line of Coast Ntghrgr ; tbertcf
S NorthweaterV 41vng tha' Eastarly line of last mentioned annexed tirritox7
4 ''am along last mentioned Westerly'line to the Northerly corner of last
• 1
•'! 5 mentioned ennaxid territory. being point int of beglanin
at this deaeriptittn.i
t
12
13
14
b
. 17
18
y
20
21
22
23
24
t
25it
F.
26 '
2720
�•' ;�
t .
�.) •' 7..••, , ,• !,. j, •t,,l• It , ' ^'•1� t
',St^ t tt• A� +�, It
i1 • 4 �, •y? •f. t l 1 J
0
:. Be—ac � K. CALL .I�NCit of Huratington"
i CITT ATtfallMtT
rr.w Popp
.+.�.w.rr. PAUL CsJONti
+�i� • P.O. OOX too TOR A sli+/! clr.;e�
M Y.tTT aAll
' ItK iF
D 0
i'
J
#TV i'� t�cuw�aa
COUNCILMEN Ao0Y11«[ Mi t�`�
JAK< R. STRWART. MAYOR ,
TIED W. SARTLICTT , �' MRAN4[R p:`CASTLRALVI ,
M. oaN
[RNtST N.GISLER Karch 30 1961; -AAM1*►AaalWOR ,
At1IATo11
11. JDNN V.V. GREEN
OR. HENRY S. ICAUFMAV
DR. DONALD D. SMIPLEY
Kembir• of the •'City Council
City of Huntington Beach
Getatle`en. f
I• just` racaivad ' frame .they Ex�autiv ice�, a off + r:`of`'tha Iracal
theaC�.t o(r�a ian.°`Carir�ioaF{ a' prNZ�'Asuiliide
aal oa :the: part of.
y pal Breach to annex . Co1:6W
Wthiah iX� diroctly scrd'ii pacific.. Cokst HighMay furor
prc�party pprea�ntly in the
City of '�tuotiton Doach '
httact4d," h0 r4to is a copy of such, ptwpposal, together
with thi�newranduse from Mr. Richard T. Turner, Exec-
utive Office r of the LAM , I
Them ears to be a, differanci ; of ``inilna= batrued vas- �
ious.'at►oi66rsr of the C�.ty Staff ,,On ether ;tha. City , ;;ra
should let such' annes g�► through uncai�tastd; 'or should
!�F
ondoaver to Bret up a case against this,;`aanaxition. The
hearing on 'sat>>rrte has bean seat for May 10, 1967 .
I. would s �s t that our Honorable Bodyconsider this ;
propnsal sit
haa.:base *ad*, and at your April 3rd
Noet14 puChorize' whatever action, if any , you rriijk'-
to have pursued .
Sincerely yours ,
Of ,
r
Paul C. r3 nos .I
City Clark
PcJ/rt
Rae . �
JAIMtf R. w1NQt1ER O. NIGGINS
F10(CTO. 0/ •UAL/C *$*A a Fiat tNltt
.1 99""CTII REYNOLD1
RRAN N. ARaUtLLO VINCENT i MOORMOUt
111twAsi tMllr
/I•Mtt AI MCCTOII j"` '., y,;
MQA�I Mr!NTMY OLLIK;C CLtYRLAKO
10NN iRL1tLR MtgAtilAw •
hLitN t:wlar ►10,* f,lOta/N wIL'11rr llNftfs•