HomeMy WebLinkAboutArticles of Incorporation - Redevelopment Agency - 1968 - 19 FRANK M. JORDAN
SECRETARY OF STATE 5
the
SecretaY -of State
SACRAMENTO
I, FRANK M. JORDAN, Secretary of State of the State
of California, hereby certify:
That on the 16th day of February, 1968, pursuant to the
provisions of Section 33102, Health and Safety Code, State of
California, relating to Redevelopment Agencies, there was filed
in this office:
A certified copy of Ordinance No. 1285, passed
and adopted by the City .Council of the CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH on January 16, 1967, declaring
the need for a Redevelopment Agency to function
in said city, and declaring the City Council of
said city to be the Agency.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set
my hand and affix the Great Seal
of the State of California this
16th day of February, 1968.
FRANK M. JORDAN
Secretary of State
By
11. P. Sullivan
Assistant Secretary of State
I�
\
10921-e62.-s.w OSF
r
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ORDINANCE No. 1285
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE
BY ADDING CHAPTER 50 AND ARTICLES AND SECTIONS
THERETO, DECLARING A NEED FOR A REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY TO FUNCTION IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH, AND DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID
CITY TO BE THE AGENCY.
WHEREAS, there exists within the City of Huntington
Beach blighted areas as defined in Chapter 1, Article 3 of
part I, Division 24, of the California Health and Safety Code,
which Part I of said Division 24 of said Code is* known as the
Community Redevelopment; and
WHEREAS, Section 33100 of the Co:-munity Redevelopment
Law created in the City of Huntington Beach, a public body,
corporate and politic for the purpose of exercising the powers
granted by the Community Redevelopment Law, but provided, pur-
suant to Section 33101 thereof, that said public body corporate
and politic shall not transact any business or exercise any
powers unless, by Ordinance, the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach declares there is a need for such agency to
function;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of
the City of Huntington Beach, as follows:
Section 1. That Chapter 50, entitled "REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY" is hereby added to the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code,
to read in words and figures as follows:
Ord. No. 1285
CHAPTER 50
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Section 2. That Article 501 is hereby added to Chapt-
er 50 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, to read in
words and figures, as follows:
ARTICLE 501 - "REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY"
Section 3. That the following sections are hereby
added to Article 501 of Chapter 50 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code, to read in words and figures as follows;
Section 5011. It is hereby found and declared, pursuant to
Section 33101 of the Community Redevelopment
Law, that there is a need for the Redevelopment Agency created
by Section 33100 of said law to function in the City of Hunt-
ington Beach, and said Agency is hereby authorized to transact
business and exercise its powers under the Community Redevelop-
ment Law,
Section 5012. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 33200 of
the Community Redevelopment Law, this body here-
by declares itself to be the Agency provided in Section 5011
hereof and that all the rights, powers, duties, privileges and
Immunities vested by the Community Redevelopment Law in such
Agency shall be, and are, vested in this body.
Section 4. The Redevelopment Agency hereby authorized
to function shall cause a certified copy of this ordinance to
be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of California.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the pass-
age and adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to
be published by one insertion in the Huntington Beach News, a
weekly newspaper printed, published and circulated in the City
2.
Ord. No. 1285
of Huntington Beach, California, and thirty (30) days there-
after the sane shall take effect and be in force.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California, this �i1 tii day of January
1967.
Mayor_
ATTEST:
City,,CC.er
APPROVED AS TO FiM
k BUS
City At
3•
Ord. No. 1285
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I, PAUL C. JONES, the duly elected, qualified City
Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the
City Council of the said City, do hereby certify that the whole number
of members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach is seven;
that the foregoing ordinance was read to said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of January,
19 67 , and was again read to said City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 16th day of January 19 67 and
was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of more than a majority of
all the members of said City Council.
AYES: Councilmen:
Coen, Bartlett, Gisler, Kaufman, Shipley, Green, Stewart
NOES: Councilmen:
None
ABSENT: Councilmen:
None
City Clerk an x-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
I. PAUL C. JONES, CITY CLERK of the City of
Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City
:ouncil, do hereby certify that this ordinance has
peen blish-,d in the Huntington Beach News on
i
..... .y�� 196�.
In ordance with t+ City Charter of said City.
................................................................................
City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
2 . 80. 010--2.80. 020
I
Chapter 2. 80
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Sections:
2 .80. 010 Established.
2.80.020 Powers and duties.
2.80. 010 Established. It is found and declared, pursuant
to section of the California Health and Safety Code, that
there is a need for the redevelopment agency created by section
33100 of said law to function in the city, and .said agency is
authorized to transact business and exercise its powers under
the California Health and Safety Code. (Ord. 1285, 15 Feb 67)
2.80. 020 Powers and duties. Pursuant to the provisions
of section 33200 of the Cali ornia Health and Safety Code,
this body declares itself to be the agency provided in sec-
tion 2.80.010 hereof and that all rights, powers, duties, priv-
ileges and immunities vested by the California Health and
Safety Code in such agency shall be, and are, vested in this
body. (Ord. 1285, 15 Feb 67 )
i
40
COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AND
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of ,
1983 , by and between the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a mu icipal
corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "CITY" ) , and the
HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY , a public body corporate and
politic, duly created and functioning under the laws of the State
of. California (hereinafter referred to as the "AGENCY") , in entering
into and performing this Agreement, each acting under and pursuant
to the California Community Redevelopment Law and each functioning
as an administrative arm of the State of California in effectuating
the purposes of the California Community Redevelopment Law.
W I T N E S S E T H :
WHEREAS , the Agency , in accordance with and pursuant to the
Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, is under-
taking redevelooment projects (hereinafter referred to as the "Pro-
jects" ) ; and
WHEREAS , the Projects involve undertakings and activities by the
Agency in the Project Areas for the elimination and prevention of
blight and for the development of sound and economically productive
use of the Project Areas; and
WHEREAS , in order for the Agency to effectuate the Projects ,
certain assistance by the City is required; and
WHEREAS , it is necessary and in the sound interest of the
community and otherwise beneficial and advantageous for the City to
Provide to the Agency certain assistance and to otherwise cooperate
with the Agency in carrying out the projects in effectuation of
State policy specified in the California Community Redevelopment Law
to the end that deleterious conditions in the Project Areas be re-
moved and that the Project Areas be renewed in accordance with sound
practical planning objectives, which renewal will result in in-
creases of tax revenues from the Project Areas and contribute
materially to the well-being , progress and development of the
community as a whole;
NOW, THEREFORE , pursuant to the provisions of the Community
Redevelopment Law of the State of California, and in consideration
of the benefits to accrue to the City, the community and the citizens
thereof from said Projects , and of the convenants hereinafter set
forth, the CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH and the HUNTINGTON BEACH RE-
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY do agree as follows :
Section 1 : Staff services shall be provided or furnished to
the Agency by the City as hereinafter set forth:
Members of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach
shall serve collectively as the Huntington Beach Redevelop-
ment Agency and , as such, shall be eligible for reimbursement
by the Agency for actual and necessary expenses incurred in
carrying out that function and for direct compensation as
provided for under Sections 33114 and 33114 . 5 of the Cali-
fornia Community Redevelopment Law. The amount of such com-
Densation shall be thirty dollars ($30) per member for each
meeting of the Agency devoted to Redevelopment activities
and attended by the member, so long as these meetings are not
conducted in conjunction with the regularly schededuled
meetings of the City Council . No member shall receive com-
pensation for attending more than four meetings of the Agency
during any calendar month.
b. The City shall furnish the Agency the services of the City
Administrator to act as Chief Executive Officer for the
Agency, and will furnish such other supporting administrative
and technical staff services as may from time-to-time be de-
termined by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the
Agency and the City as necessary for the expeditious perfor-
mance of Agency business.
c. The City shall furnish to the Agency the services of the
Department of Administrative Services to carry out the ac-
counting , disbursement and audit of funds functioning as may
be required for the efficient performance of Agency functions .
-2-
d. The Agency shall reimburse to the City the costs of such staff ser-
vices provided. Reimbursement will include the Agency's pro-rata sha
of staff salaries and all employee fringe benefits.
e. The Agency shall reimburse to the City such other staff service-relat
expenses as may from time-to-time be deemed necessary and appropriate
which expenses may include, but need not be limited to, such items as
travel, materials and equipment costs .
f. The City shall periodically, not less than annually, submit to the
Agency a statement of the costs incurred by the City in providing the
services and facilities pursuant to this agreement. Said statement ma
include a proration of the City ' s administrative and salary expenses
attributable to the services of the City officials , employees , and de
partments rendered on behalf of the Agency. '
g . A monthly financial status report shall be prepared for Agency review
on an ongoing basis .
Section 2: The City and the Agency shall from time-to-time enter into
perative agreements to implement the provisions of this Cooperation Agreement
Section 3 : Other administrative and/or technical services shall be pro-
vided or furnished to the Agency as hereinafter set forth:
a . As from time-to-time it may be determined or advantageous , the City
agrees to construct or cause to be constructed such public improve-
ments or facilities as may be required under provisions of the Re-
development Plans or as may be necessitated by requirements of a
proposed development or reuse within the Project Areas .
b. The Agency agrees that the cost of such improvements or facilities
shall be advanced by the Agency to the City or the City shall be
reimbursed by the Agency as necessary for such contract or other
payments as may accrue for the construction thereof as set forth
in an appropriate Operative Agreement and subject to compliance
with Health and Safety Code Section 33445 if applicable .
Section 4: The City agrees that at no cost or expense to the Agency,
end upon the Agency ' s request, the City will accomplish or cause to be
accomplished the vacating of all streets , roads , alleys and other public
•ays , to be eliminated in preparing the Project Areas for its new uses , in
accordance with, or as subsequently determined necessary in order to carry
out the purposes of the Redevelopment Plans.
-3-
A-
�'
The City agrees to convey or cause to be conveyed to the
Agency , at a cost no greater than fair-market value, any and all
land and interests in land in the Project Areas owned by the City
for which it is necessary to the accomplishment of the purposes of
the Redevelopment Plans that such land be acquired by the Agency.
Conveyance of such land shall be made within a reasonable time in
accordance with applicable State laws and/or local regulations and
after request therefor by the Agency in order to facilitate carrying
out the Redevelopment Plans .
Section 5 : The Agency agrees , with respect to those lands in
areas designated by the Redevelopment Plans or to be designated
pursuant to the Redevelopment Plans for reuse as streets , roads ,
alleys , sidewalks and other public ways , to dedicate or grant in
fee such land for street or other public purposes . The City agrees
that it will , within a reasonable time after request therefor by
the Agency , accept the dedication thereof for street and other public
purposes in accordance with the Redevelopment Plans . The City further
agrees to accept or cause to be accepted all grants or easements
necessary for the reuse of the Project Areas in accordance with the
Redevelopment Plans .
Section 6 : The City agrees that, after the City' s acceptance
thereof, it shall maintain in good repair and working order , or cause
to be so maintained, all streets , roads , alleys , sidewalks , storm
sewers , water mains and other public improvements in the Project Areas
constructed, installed or reconstructed, either by the City or the
Agency for such time as said improvements are so used by the public
in accordance with the maintenance policies of the City. The City
further agrees that it will furnish, or cause to be furnished, at
its own expense , or through an appropriate lighting district , the
necessary electric current adequately and properly to light all street
lights that may be installed in public streets , alleys or other public
ways pursuant to the Redevelopment Plans or, in the future, in the
Project Areas .
The City further agrees that it will furnish, or cause to be
furnished, all necessary and proper municipal services for so long
as the same shall be needed as required by the Project Areas and the
inhabitants thereof , in accordance with its new uses as specified
AO
by the Redevelopment Plans .
Section 7 : The City agrees with respect to each and every
public facility to be provided or furnished by it under this Agree-
ment , that such public facilities shall be open without regard to
race, color, religion, sex, or national origin to all occupants of
the Redevelopment Project Areas after renewal and, if such facilities
are provided on project land acquired from the Agency, to all others .
Section 8 : If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid ,
the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby if such
remainder would then continue to conform to the terms and requirements
of State Redevelopment Law and other applicable State laws and any
applicable Federal law.
Section 9 : The obligations of the Agency hereunder shall consti-
tute an indebtedness of the Agency in the meaning of Article 6 ,
Chapter 6 of the California Community Redevelopment Law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE HUN-
TINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY have caused this Agreement to be
duly executed in their behalf and the City seal to be hereunto affixed
and attested , all as of the date and year first above written .
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
By& By
Mayor Chairman
.ATTEST:
City/Agency Clerk
INITATED AND APPROVED AS TO APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CONTENT: /
Director, Business & Industrial Sa development Counsel
Enterprise
UNITED STAMP & DIE COMPANY
533 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105
(415) 362-2697
April 27 , 1989
Jones Hall Hill & White
Four Embarcadero Center , Suite 1950
San Francisco , CA 94111
Dear Glenda :
Listed below are quotes for a corporate seal with a logo
of the City of Huntington Beach .
We will need better artwork , i . e . a velox or stat , when
the Redelopment Agency decides on which emobsser they want .
This is necessary to get the detailing of the pier .
112 pocket seal w/logo $270 . 00
112 desk seal w/log 290 . 00
#2 Cast Iron seal w/logo 330. . 00
as ro Ong rreach 400 . 00
w/logo
1._ . .. .
After the order is placed the turn around time will be
approximately 3 weeks .
Sincerely ,
Susan Peters
Manager
cc : file
Ht
> ' CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACIi
I-I '
To Wes Banhister, Mayor From Connie Brockway, City Clerk
Subject REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SEAL Date June 22, 1989
The City needs a Redevelopment Agency seal . Some time ago the
Redevelopment staff prepared copy work of a pier design (see
attached) , however the seal company cannot make such a seal unless
the details are made sharper.
A plain seal can be made, another seal design , or the pier design
can be used.
I thought perhaps you might want to discuss a proposed design for
the Redevelopment Agency seal with members of the Council and with
the City Administrator and staff.
I have selected the #2 Cast Iron Long Reach as there are a great
many Redevelopment Agency documents to seal and the cast iron
city seal I use now (about 50 years old) is great.
CB-.bt
P. S . A picture of our city seal is attached.
The Huntington Beach Civic Improvement Corp. and the
Huntington Beach Public Facilities Corporation are both
plain seals and were provided by the bonding companies
automatically.
��Z•CFiL'' Cam,;'�y"`^'l � �" _ G����..ti.c�-
�� 0
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
Apri 1 10, 1989
Glenda Bell
Tones, lial 1 , Hill and White
Center ItI950
-I(-i-sco, Ca 9 4 111
1'ral j
Del,:if- Glen(:a,
1.;nclosedl is a copy of the propose(:] Redevelopn)--nt- Seal . 'The dame
15, .1.967) is the effective daLe of the City Ordinance No. 1285
de,clari-:iq the City Council to be the Arjency
1, apprec-iate your obtaininq a quote For IL-1he is designed
W.0-h Lhe :-,J-er as opposed to the (:o L of an C)!-,-I-I!nary Seal .
(Tolophono: '714-536-5227)
/a 41 C l a
a� CIT. OF HUNTINGTON BOACHI
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
NUNTINCTON BEACH
p Doug Labelle From Alicia M. Wentworth
Depc_cty City Administrator/Redevelopment City Clerk
:)ubiec.t Of ficial Seal for Redevelopment Date 1/19/n>3
Agency
During the CiLy-sponsored "BAD" program an employee in the Clerk 's
Uffir.e. suggested that the Redevelopment Agency have its ' own seal
fur (;fficial Redevelopment Agency documents.
Ari o sample, we have attached a copy of the city seal and the adopting
nr(iinZ)nk,e. Also attached is the incorporation papers of the Redevelul:Iment.
i r_IenCy.
Designing and acquiring a city seat will enable all official Redevelopment.
Agency documents to be sealed.
CC : Paul Conk , CiLy Admini:3traLor
A!"
4iFr' '11,A + s •.« it rr'A.. '.t _`yam�F «'..i_'S?:«�h�-1 , :`�T':..;.: ;�tx'rx+..?.c�?�a,..�?y}.,1�7+i ':t ia.
r - L•t n r snF• ti i ,+'ut tM �i$T'sty wY Yx Y c y+x F r r^ s- i
T3 '1 �t 1 F v}saef i s -a_'S F t r s a •:7.
} w J a 'E zrS{
Y, ,.
v.r �n4 -'n+•i}.aQ•. i c-�a�+l �,t•tt^£'+..t; ' :`>Sb-:' Fyy. t.]iftk<f - s.sfiK',. LLL '��:. 0 ?"a -�,', a,� t: 1, ..
A"�2 ��a to '+•�+t�„-�s•x''U. __«. "S-F _ __Y} t i�'��� ,.-`u-. "C'.•.. ra,.- I�^'""•s,�- �- cF�'
A s � +'b- _ � rrt _ '" _ � R_ r yr- -c'- - 1 f!Y.tA'it�t-.u:a[a F7�sv}.+t�.� q. -t -•"4
.^- 5'y -i t .k? - ..�: v._.. _x.+ 't 'r' 1'C�.w.t�`-.i ='tom.v5 �: _
§ . '�� ' CITY..OF HUNTINGTONBEACFI;t . y
f ••�{ INTER DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION a y
"HUNTINGTON BEACH
To Wes Bannister, Mayor From Connie<Bro,ckway, City Clerk
Subject.:..REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. SEAL Date June .22, 1989.
x The City 'needs a Redevelopment Agency seal . . Some'aime ago the
Redevelopment staff prepared copy work'.of a .p�ertdesign (see'
attached however the seal company cannot-_make,: =a seal_ unless
._ the details -are made sharper.
A plain seal; can be made, another seal design, or, then pier design
can be used:
I thought perhaps you might want to discuss ,a proposed design for
the Redevelopment_Agency seal with member.s,:of 'the.-,Council:":and with
the City Administrator and staff. -
I have. selected the #2 Cast Iron Long Reach .;as,,_tfiere are a*;great
many Redevelopment Agency documents to seal 'and- ttie cast iron
city seal :I use now-.(about 50 years. old) 1 s ;great.
P. S. A picture of our city. seal is attached.
The Huntington Beach Civic Improvement Corp. . and. the
Huntington Beach Public Facilities Corporation are, both
plain seals'.and were provided by the bonding companies
automatically.
le
O G0KPO � q ?'
b
GPMENN
1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AND
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATED
JUNE 20 , 1983
That certain Cooperation Agreement between the City of
Huntington Beach and the Redevelopment Agency dated June 20, 1983
shall be amended to modify paragraph (a ) of Section 1 to read as
follows:
a . Members of the City Council of the City of Huntington
Beach shall serve as the Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Agency and, as such, shall be eligible
for reimbursement by the Agency for actual and
necessary expenses incurred in carrying out that
function and for direct compensation as provided for
under Sections 33114 and 33114 .5 of the California
Community Redevelopment Law. The amount of such
compensation shall be thirty dollars ($30 ) per member
for each meeting of the Agency attended by the
member . No member ' shall receive compensation for
attending more than four meetings of the Agency during
any calendar month .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE
HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY have caused this Agreement
to be duly executed in their behalf and the City seal to be
i
hereunto affixed and attested, all as of the date and year first
above written .
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
By Zqaa By
n
ATTEST:
City/Agency Clerk
INITIATED AND APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Administrator/ City Attor ey Agency ,Co4insel
Executive Director ��
ylv�/`J
#38411
2 .
9
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HELD MONDAY, JANUARY 17, 1983 WAS ADJOURNED TO
MONDAY, JANUARY 24, 1983 AT 7:30 P. M. , OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS POSSIBLE IN
ROOM B-8, CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
BY
61'DepZty
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD AT THE
ENTRANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, ON JANUARY 18, 1983, AT 9:30 A.M.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk o : the Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Huntington Beach,
BY gZLJ
D uty
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HELD MONDAY, OCTOBER 18, 1982, WAS ADJOURNED
TO MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1982 AT 6:00 P.M. , OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS POSSIBLE
IN ROOM B-8, CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
"M V
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD AT THE
ENTRANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, ON OCTOBER 26, 1982 AT 9:00 A.M.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the
Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
/2 ,(=—
Depu
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGE14CY
OF T]HE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HELD MONDAY, JULY 18, 1977, WAS ADJOURNED
TO MONDAY, JULY 25, 1977, AT 7:30 P.M. , IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER,
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk for Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Huntington Beach,
California
By
Deputy City Clerk
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE;.BULLETIN BOARD
AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ON `1'UESDAY, JULY 19, 1977, AT 9:00 A.M.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk for Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Huntington Beach,
California
Bo'.
Deputy City Clerk
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENOY
OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HELD MONDAY, JANUARY 17, 1977, WAS ADJOURNED
TO MONDAY, JANUARY 31, 1977, AT 7:00 P.M. , IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER,
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk for Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Huntington Beach,
California
By
Deputy City Clerk
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD
AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 18, 1977, AT 9:00 A.M.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk for Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Huntington Beach,
California
By
Deputy City Clerk
1
I
I �
i
NOTICE
JOINT PUBLIC, HEARING - CITY COUNCIVREAEVELOPMENT AGENCY & COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION - PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLANIFOR THE HUNTINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN PROJECT AREA
1
AND FINAL ENVIRQNkENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Monday, January ' 31,' 1977, at 7:00 P.M. ih the Council Chambers, Civic Center, 2000 Main
Street, ;is the' date and. time scheduled fbr the continuation of the joint Public Hearing
to consider 'the,proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Huntington Beach Downtown Project
Area, which 'was opened on November 18, 1976, and continued to November 22, 1976. The
hearin lhas ;been continued-open' n to tabs additional testimon yand to consider and act
upon the Redevelop lent ;Plan and a,1 s Fin Environmental Impact Report and all matters
ipertaining thereto:
I I
i I
i
Alicia M. -Wentworth
Clerk,. Redevelopment Agency
a City ofHuntington Beach
I ,
,
i I
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1976, WAS ADJOURNED TO
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1976, AT 5:00 P.M. IN THE HUNTINGTON BEACH HIGH
SCHOOL GYMNASIUM, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk, Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Agency
By
Deputy Clerk
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN BOARD
AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ON NOVEMBER 16, 1976, AT 9:00 A.M.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Clerk, Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Agency
(::��BY
Deputy Clerk
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL/
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH HELD MONDAY,
OCTOBER 11, 1976, WAS ADJOUREND TO MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1976, AT 5:00 P.M.
IN THE HUNTINGTON BEACH HIGH SCHOOL GYMNASIUM, 1905 MAIN STREET,
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.
Alicia M. Wentworth
City- Clerk and ex-officioClerk
of the City Council 'of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
By Q/l a
Deputy City Clk4k
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN
BOARD AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE 'CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CIVIC CENTER,
HUNTINGTON BEACH, .CALIFIORNIA ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1976.
Alicia M. Wentworth'.
City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
By W
Deputy City Cle
I
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUNTINGTON
BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD MONDAY, MAY 17, 1976, WAS ADJOURNED
TO WEDNESDAY, MAY 26, 1976, AT 7:30 P.M., IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER,
CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Secretary, Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Agency
By (;�j '��V
Deputy
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN
BOARD AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CIVIC CENTER,
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ON MAY 18, 1976, AT 9:00 A.M.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Secretary, Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Agency
By C.r
Deputy 1
Affidavit of �,,*lication
State of California
County of Orange ss
City of Huntington Beach
George Farquhar, being duly sworn on oath, says: That he is a
citizen of the United States, over the age of twenty-one years.
That he is the printer and publisher of the Huntington Beach
News, a weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub-
lished in Huntington Beach, California and circulated in the said
County of Orange and elsewhere and published for the dissemination
of local and other news of a general character, and has a bona fide
subscription list of paying subscribers, and said paper has been
established, printed and published in the State of California, and
County of Orange, for at least one year next before the publication
of the first insertion of this notice; and the said newspaper is not
devoted to the interest of, or published for the entertainment of any
particular class, profession, trade, calling, race or denomination, or
any number thereof.
The Huntington Beach New was adjudicated a legal newspaper
of general circulation by Judge G. K. Scovel in the Superior Court
of Orange County, California August 27th, 1937 by order No. A-5931.
That the NOTICE OF MEETING OF HUNTINGTON Putiiishea'Hi,ntington eeacll:News, Feb.
19 1976.' s.
NOTICE OF-MEETING OF.HUNTINGTON
BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BEACH REDEVELOPMENTr AGENCY
of which the annexed is a printed co was published in said news- H�gTicE Is HEREBY GIVEN mat a mI0p-
P copy, P in=of-'the Huntington��8each Redevelop-
ment agency-will,be held-un.the-council
OI1e Issue 8 u@ chsmtier"of"ttie,civic-`center;"Huniirigton
paper at least Beach,"-at the hour of._7 66 P.M. or as
soon,thereafter ,as.,possible,,on•Monday;,:
{the 1st,day of March 1976 -for the.Puri-
commencing from the 19th day of February 'pose_of considering a--resolution.of'the
Redevelopmentt`Agericy' accep'trng a lo2n-
�� from the City of Hunlington Beach artd
19 ` 6 and ending on the � day of February agreeing :,s�bseq" �ntiy reimburse_ the
city in,:conne'ctron withadministrative-
eiipenSin of�theiA6ehey as p+ovided-for.
19Z6 both days inclusive, and as often during said by Section .33610.. •tt seq o`f,the Cali=
� ys g period and fomre=Health.andr Safety:Code.'.` -
times of publication as said paper was regularly issued, and in the By nUCIA M.'WENTWORTH-
regular and entire issue of said pewspaper proper, and not in a I secretary
supplement, and said notice was published therein on the following
dates, to-wit:
Feb. 19, 1976
Publisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 0 t h day of
February 19_16
Notary Public
Orange County, California
--------
- THOMAS D. WYLLIE
i Notary Public-California i
m 'a Orange County i
r My Comrnission Expires i
September 12. 1978 i
---- --------1
i
q0of Huntington Be
County of Orange
State of California
Affidavitof Publication
of GEORGE FARQUHAR
Publisher Huntington Beach News
Filed
Clerk
By
Deputy Clerk
NOTICE OF MEETING OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A MEETING OF THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON
BEACH, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 P.M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS POSSIBLE, ON MON-
DAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 1976, FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING A RESOLUTION
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACCEPTING A LOAN FROM THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH AND AGREEING TO SUBSEQUENTLY REIMBURSE THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH AD-
MINISTRATIVE EXPENSES OF THE AGENCY AS PROVIDED FOR BY SECTION 33610 ET SEQ.
OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE.
r
r
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUNTINGTON
BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD MONDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1976, WAS ADJOURNED
TO WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1976, AT 7:00 P.M., IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Secretary, Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Agency
By(��J
Deputy
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN
BOARD AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CIVIC CENTER,
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ON OCTOBER 5, 1976, AT 9:00 A.M.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Secretary, Huntington Beach-
Redevelopment Agency
By �Deputy
NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUNTINGTON
BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HELD MONDAY, MARCH 1, 1976, WAS ADJOURNED
TO WEDNESDAY, MARCH 3, 1976, AT 8:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER,
CIVIC CENTER, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Secretary
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE BULLETIN
BOARD AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER OF THE CIVIC CENTER,
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ON MARCH 2, 1976, AT 9:00 A.M.
Alicia M. Wentworth
Secretary
i
r v
•
EJ
CITY OF HUNTINGTON 13EACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To Bud Belsito, City Administrator From Alicia M. Wentworth, City Clerk
Subject Redevelopment Agency d Date 8/31/77
Parking Authority Minutes
i
The question has come up in the past regarding the approval of
minutes of the Redevelopment Agency and Parking Authority. Attached
is a response from the City Attorney's Office stating that there is
no legal requirement that minutes of these specific previous meet-
ings be approved.
Therefore, starting with the 9/6/77 meeting agenda, Redevelopment
Agency and/or Parking Authority will only be placed on the agenda
if a meeting is set at a previous meeting or a special meeting
called.
In the event action is taken in the future, the minutes will be
placed in the packets stamped "INFORMATION ONLY."
Attached you will find the Attorney's memo and a copy of my request
to their office.
You may wish to inform Council of this change in your CA Friday.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To Richard Harlow, From Alicia M. Wentworth
Assistant City Administrator City Clerk
Subject REDEVELOPMENT AGWCY AND •. Date May .16, 1977
PARKING AUTHORITY 'MEETINGS
Last week we had discussed`'tl a"j)ossibili'ty of-;eliminating
the need to place. the convening'of�the Rsdevelopment Agency
and the Parking Authority-on .each'-Council -Agenda, as recently
no .business has been-transaeted',,.`aad the`meeiings are convened
solely to approve previously-'.meeting- minutes.
We. are attaching copies' of:the resolutions which set-.the time
and place, etc. for said meetingW-in the event .that it might
be possible to amend said reso]utions:. to provde•that meetings
of the Parking Authority-W:the-,Redevelopment-Agency could be
held after being called_-for= at aprevious meeting. It is also
recommended that a-new section-'be added to. include a provision
whereby the Mayor -shall be alltowed,to.approve and execute
minutes of previous meetings if-no specific action had been
taken.
Encls:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH \
To Alicia Wentworth From John O' Connor
City Clerk Deputy City Attorney
Subject Redevelopment Agency and Date June 28, 1977
Parking Authority Meetings
Approval of the minutes of the Redevelopment Agency or the Parking
Authority would require official action by the respective bodies
as a whole, and any provision delegating such authority to the chair- 1
person would, in our opinion, be an improper delegation of authority
and invalid.
There are several easy solutions to the problem. Fi , _ there is no
legal requirement that the minutes of previous meetings be approved.
Second, the meetings could beset at less frequent intervals , thereby
obviating the necessity of calling the meetings to order.
i
J N 0' C R
eputy City Attorney
JO:bc
cc : Dick Harlow
Assistant City Administrator
' t >
RESOLUTION NO. 10
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIXING THE TIME OF REG-
ULAR MEETINGS OF SUCH AGENCY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach that Section 1 of Resolution No. 1 entitled,
"A Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach Fixing the Time and Place of Regular Meetings ,
Appointing Officers and Providing for Use of Services and
Facilities of City Departments,". is hereby amended to read as
follows:
SECTION 1. That regular a t04thgird
ofpaid�Redt—/ 4C,mA� �Agency shall be held every first Mondays of each month
at the hour of 1 : 10 p.m. in the Council Chambers in City Hall,
2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, and that in all
respects meetings of said Redevelopment Agency shall be governed
by and be in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (California
Government Code Sections 54950 et seq. ) . Except as otherwise
provided by the Community Redevelopment Law (California Health
and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq. ) , the rules of procedure
for the City Council as set forth in the Charter of said City
shall also apply to the City Council acting as the Redevelopment
Agency insofar as such rules can be made applicable.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City
Of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th
day of January, 1977.
airman
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
WSA :ahb Auc►a K VIENTWOM
ecretary �fA ega vi r
By W
Deputy 1.
1
t
RESOLUTION No. 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PARKING AUTHORITY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIXING THE TIME AND
PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS, APPOINTING OFFIC-
ERS AND PROVIDING FOR USE OF SERVICES AND
FACILITIES OF CITY DEPARTMENTS-
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach,
acting as the parking Authority of the City of Huntington
Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That regular m�e�etj s of said Parking
01
. •c�A=�:CGK -y c.t
Authority shall be held e Yof
eoth =r30 z'.o c7i.00k P.M. in the Council
Chnmbers in the Me=riel...Hell-- Sixth and Pecan in said City,
and that in all respects meetings of said Parking Authority
shall be governed by and be In compliance with the Ralph M.
Brown Act (Sections 549509 et seq. of the Govern:'nent Code
of the State of California). Except as otherwise provided
In the Parking Law of 1949, the rules of procedure for the
City Council as set forth in the Charter of said City shall.
also apply to the City Council acting as the Parking Author-
ity insofar as such rules can be made applicable.
Section 2. Thet pursuant to the designation pre-
viously made the Mayor of said City shall act ex officio
as the Chairman of said .Authority.
t
Section 3. That the Vice-Mayor of said City shall
act ex officio as the Vice-Chairman of said Authority.
1.
RESOLUTION No. 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PARKING AUTHOrRITY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIXING THE TIME AND
PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS, APPOINTING OFFIC-
ERS AND PROVIDING FOR USE OF SERVICES AND
FACILITIES OF CITY DEPARTMENTS.
The City Council of the City of Huntington BeFach,
acting as the Parking Authority of the City of Huntington
Beach, California, does hereby resolve as follows:
Section 1. That regular meetIngs of said Parking
Authority shall be held a day- of
ki3V .o4cloek P.M. in the Council
Chflmbers in the Memorial Hell, Sixth and Pecan in said City,
and that in all respects meetings of said Parking Authority
si:all be governed by and be in compliance with the Ralph M.
arown Act (Sections 549509 et seq. of the Government Code
of the State of California). Except as otherwise provided
In the Parking Lew of 1949, the rules of procedure for the
City Council as set forth in the Charter of said City shal].
also apply to the City Council acting as the Parking Author-
ity insofar as such rules can be made applicable.
Section 2. Thet pursuant to the designation pre-
viously made the Mayor of said City shall act ex officio
as the Chairman of said Authority.
Section 3• That the Vice-Mayor of said City shall
act ex officio as the Vice-Chairman of said Authority.
• 1.
^ i"A
• CITY OF HUf1TInGTon BEACH
P.O. BOX 190, CALIFORNIA 92648
�%-- PLANNING DEPT. (714) 536-5271
TO: Redevelopment Agency
FROM: Planning Department
DATE: August 16, 1976
ATTN: Floyd G. Belsito, Executive Director
RE: OWNER PARTICIPATION RULES
One of the required actions prior to adoption of a Redevelopment
Plan is for the Agency to adopt and make available for public
inspection, rules for owner participation in conformity with the
Redevelopment Plan.
The attached rules (Exhibit A) were prepared by the Planning
Department staff in conjunction with Urban Projects Inc.
The rules set forth procedures whereby owners of real property
and tenants are given preferences in the implementation of the
Redevelopment Plan. Also, the rules provide for participation
agreements whereby the participant agrees to rehabilitate ,
develop or use the property in conformance with the Redevelopment
Plan. Finally, certificate of conformity procedures are outlined
for those properties already in conformance with the plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt by resolution the attached owner participation rules..and
instruct City Clerk to make the adopted rules available for
public inspection.
Respectfully submitted,
/EJa D6'e 1 i Wch
Acting Director
Planning and Environmental Resources
EDS:gc
Enclosure: Resolution
Exhibit A, Owner Participation Rules
1
IV
RESOLUTION NO. 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING A DRAFT
OF OWNER PARTICIPATION RULES FOR THE HUNTINGTON
BEACH DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
WHEREAS , Section 3339 . 5 of the California Health and Safety
Code provides that every redevelopment agency shall adopt and
make available for public inspection rules for the implementa-
tion of a redevelopment plan for a downtown redevelopment pro-
gram area; and
Exhibit "A" constitutes a draft of such rules for owners ,
operators and tenants in the Huntington Beach Downtown Redevel-
opment Project Area which draft was prepared at the direction of
the Redevelopment Director,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Huntington Beach has read, approved and hereby
adopts the draft of rules governing participation by and prefer-
ences of owners , operators of businesses , and tenants in the
Huntington Beach Downtown Redevelopment Project Area (Exhibit "A" )
as its rules for the implementation of Health and Safety Code
Section 3339 . 5 as to the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area, and
directs that such rules hereafter be made available for public
inspection.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th
day of August , 1976.
ATTEST:
Mayor as Chairman o the
y Redevelopment Agency
Clerk for the
Redevelopment Agency
WSA: cs 1 ,
f�
+w
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT : APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Chie Executive Officer City Attorney s ga
Adviser for the Re elopment
Agency
APPROVED, INITIATING DEPARTMENT:
NO FISCAL IMPACT
• FISCAL IMPACT -- G+ i-r:FTF.n
FISCAL IMPACT
REQUIRES FINANCIAL IMPACT REDORT
2 .
Res . No. 6
�55
5�
`PA'IT OF CALIFORNIA )
"'MINTY OF ORANGE )
I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Clerk of the Redevelopment
A}*,rncy of the Cite of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY
(:E)PTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a
meet; na; of ,aid 'tif-development Agency held on the day of
197r, and that it was so adopted by the
followjnp vote :
AYES : Members :
Bartlett, Pattinson, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder
NOES : Members :
None
ARSENT : Members :
Coen, Gibbs
Clerk of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach
i
a
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION BY AND PREFERENCES
OF OWNERS, OPERATORS OF BUSINESSES,
AND TENANTS IN THE HUNTINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
•i
Prepared By
Huntington Beach Department of Planning
and Environmental Resources
(Redevelopment Agency Staff)
and
Urban Projects Incorporated
Consultants to the Redevelopment Agency
July, 1976
.0 +�
PRi7L"LIMINAF
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION BY AND
PREFERENCES TO OWNERS , OPERATORS OF BUSINESSES ,
AND TENANTS IN THE HUNTINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
SECTION 1 . 0 GENERAL
These Rules are adopted pursuant to Section 3333.9 . 5 of the
California Health and Safety Code to aid in the implementation
of the Redevelopment. Plan for the Huntington Beach Downtown Re-
development Project Area ("Project Area") . These Rules are
intended to provide a framework within which property owners with-
in the Project Area may improve , repair , restore or otherwise
modify their properties to conform to the standards of the Redevel-
opment Plan for the Project Area , and in the case of certain
owners of improved property to obtain confirmation that their
properties presently comply with the Redevelopment Plan.
Also , the Rules are intended to grant preferences to existing
businesses (which term includes the commercial or industrial
activities carried on or under any legal form of ownership) within
the Project Area which may be displaced from their present locations
as a result of the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan for
the Project Area and which wish to relocate within the Project Area.
ARX
I
�V.
SECTION 2 . 0 OWNER PARTICIPATION
2 . 1 Certificate of Conformity
Any owner of property, whether improved or unimproved , I
may at any time after the effective date of the Re-
development Plan for the Project Area apply to the Agency
for a certificate of conformity ("certificate" herein) .
Such a certificate , when issued , shall constitute a
statement by the Agency, in recordable form, that the
property in question presently conforms to all the pro-
visions of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area.
2 . 2 Presently Improved Properties
Owners of presently improved properties meeting the re-
quirements of these Rules , including the redevelopment
standards incorporated herein, shall be entitled to re-
ceive a certificate upon application to the Agency or its
designated agent .
2 . 3 Unimproved and Partially Improved. Properties
Owners of unimproved or partially improved properties not
Aft 2
RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION AND PREFERENCES
BY OWNERS, OPERATORS OF BUSINESSES AND TENANTS
IN THE HUNTINGTON BEACH
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
SECTION 1 . 0 GENERAL
These rules are adopted pursuant to provisions of the California
Health and Safety Code for the purpose of implementing provisions
of the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Redevelopment Project
relative to participation by owners , operators of businesses, and
tenants in the Project. These rules set forth the procedures
governing such participation.
The Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency desires and urges partic-
ipation in the growth, development and revitalization of the Project
Area by as many owners, business operators and tenants as possible.
Participation opportunities are necessarily subject to and limited
by factors such as the following:
1. the elimination and/or relocation of some land uses;
---- 2 .- the realignment and/or creation of some streets;
3. the necessity to assemble areas for public and/or private
redevelopment;
4 . the replotting of lots;
5. change in orientation and character of portions of the Project
Area;
6. the ability of Participants to finance and carry to completion
the development or property improvement specified in their
proposal to participate;
7 . the conformance of Participants ' proposals to participate with
the objectives, requirements and purposes of the Redevelopment
Plan.
K
1
SECTION 2 . 0 PARTICIPATION BY OWNERS OF REAL PROPERTY
2 . 1 Participation in the Same Location
2 . 1 . 1 Owners of real properties which conform to all provisions
and requirements of the Redevelopment Plan may participate
in the Project as conforming owners, without an Owner
Participation Agreement with the Agency, upon issuance
by the Agency of a Certificate of Conformity.
2. 1. 2 Owners of real properties which conform to the land use
provisions and redevelopment objectives of the Redevel-
opment Plan shall be afforded reasonable opportunity to
participate in the Project by retaining their properties
and rehabilitating to applicable code and other stand-
ards the improvements thereon, or developing or redevel-
oping their proper7ies in conformance with provisions of
the Redevelopment Plan.
2. 1. 3 In appropriate circumstances where such would further
the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, owners shall
be afforded a reasonable opportunity and preference to
participate in substantially the same location by retain-
ing all or portions of their properties and purchasing
contiguous or other properties in the Project Area
available for development in accordance with the Re-
development Plan.
2 . 1. 4 In appropriate circumstances where such would further
the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan, owners shall
be afforded reasonable opportunity and preference to
participate in the same location by redeveloping their
properties in conjunction with a redeveloper selected by
the Agency for the development of a consolidated parcel
of which the participant' s property is a part, or by
participating in substantially the same location with
such a redeveloper selected by the Agency in the re-
development of a consolidated parcel for which the
participant' s property was eliminated.
2 . 2 Participation in Another Location
In appropriate circumstances, ' owners shall be afforded reasonable
opportunity and preference to participate in the Project by selling
their properties to the Agency and purchasing for development in
accordance with the Redevelopment Plan other properties in the
Project Area.
SECTION 3 . 0 PARTICIPATION BY TENANTS
3 .1 Participation as Owners
Non-property owners who are tenants engaged in business or residing
within the Project Area shall be afforded reasonable opportunity
and preferences to participate by purchasing and developing in
conformance with the Redevelopment Plan properties offered for sale
by the Agency.
3. 2 Participation as Tenants
Business and residential tenants shall be given preferential
opportunities to rent or lease redeveloped commercial or residen-
tial facilities, as applicable.
X0 4i+i::" ••:Ni:
SECTION 4 . 0 RULES FOR PARTICIPATION, PRIORITIES AND PREFERENCES
In the event that conflicts develop among the participants with
respect to any particular site or land use, the Agency is author-
ized to establish reasonable preferences and priorities among the
owners and tenants within the Project Area. Considerations upon
which such priorities and preferences are based shall include but
need not necessarily be limited to the following:
'preference for property owners participating in the same
location
'preference for property owners participating by the purchase
and development of .adjacent property
'preference for Participants displaced by Project activities
'accommodation of as many participants as possible
'length of time in the area
'conformity of a participation proposal to the objectives and
requirements of the Redevelopment Plan
'ability to perform
tt.x X*s4R. f`
I
In addition to participation as individuals or as individual firms,
owners and tenants shall be given the opportunity to join together
for purposes of participating in the Project as partnerships , corp-
orations or joint entities .
SECTION 5. 0 PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Each participant, who is not a conforming owner, who retains his
property for rehabilitation or development, or who obtains real
property from the Agency, shall be required to enter into a bind-
ing agreement with the Agency by which the Participant agrees to
rehabilitate, develop, or use the property in conformance with
the Redevelopment Plan and be subject to the provisions thereof .
The Agency shall not acquire real property to be retained by an
owner pursuant to a Participation Agreement if the owner fully
performs under said agreement. In the event a Participant fails
or refuses to rehabilitate or develop his real property pursuant
to the Redevelopment Plan and the agreement then the real property
or any interest therein may be acquired by the Agency and sold or
leased for rehabilitiation or development in conformance with the
Redevelopment Plan.
In such agreements , Participants shall be required to join in the
recording of such documents as are necessary to make the provisions
of the Plan applicable to their properties . In the Participation
Agreement, a participating owner shall agree to remove or permit
the Agency to remove any and all restrictions existing against the
property involved which are contrary to those contained in the
Redevelopment Plan or the Participation Agreement and to impose
or permit the Agency to impose restrictions of record restricting
the use of the property involved to uses and development consistent
with the Redevelopment Plan and Participation Agreement.
In the Participation Agreement, a participating owner or business
tenant shall agree to insert into and make. a part of any lease,
rental agreement, occupancy permit, use or sales agreement per-
taining to the property involved or any other document pertaining
to the property or use thereof, a provision that there shall be no
restrictions imposed there o because of race, sex, color, creed,
religion, national origin,n r ancestry.
In the Participation Agreement, if a participating owner agrees to
remove, demolish, alter, improve, or rehabilitate existing
structures and improvements on the property involved, he shall
also agree to do such within specified time limits established by
the Agency. If the participating owner agrees to construct new
structures and/or improvements on the property involved or to
remove, demolish, alter, improve or rehabilitate existing property,
he shall agree to do so only after plans and specifications of the
buildings have been presented to and approved by the Agency. He
shall •also agree to perform such construction, after said approval ,
within specified time limits established by the Agency.
Participation agreements will be effective only if approved by the
Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency.
SECTION 6 . 0 PROCEDURE FOR BECOMING A PARTICIPANT
The Agency will notify by certified mail every real property
owner and tenant in the Project Area of the adoption of the
Redevelopment Plan and enclose in the same mailing, together with
these Rules, a form entitled "Statement of Interest to Participate,"
and will also notify all such persons of the date by which such
S atement shoul e submitted to. the A encyy. &oe, Or , 01'C- MP-+i141S Shall
behe1G tov all reSpor� 2 s }0 6fpi�Alm par+�c�par�o�J �roceaurBS•
Every property owner or tenant interested in becoming a Participant
should submit to the Agency a completed "Statement of Interest to
Participate" within thirty (30) days from the date of the certified
mailing by the Agency of the form for such purpose. All "Statements
of Interest to Participate" received after the established date for
receipt may be given consideration, but in a priority secondary to
those Statements received prior to the established date.
In those situations in which the Agency will be offering for sale
and development or rehabilitation properties which it has acquired,
each person who has submitted a "Statement of Interest to Partici-
___. pate" will be notified of the time within which he must submit a
proposal to participate on the offered site.
Opportunity will be given to discuss proposals with the Agency
staff and to make necessary adjustments . The Agency will make
every effort to meet the desires of every person desiring to
participate in the Project.
In those situations in which the Redevelopment Plan provides for
rehabilitation of existing structures and the Agency determines
that the property of an owner requires rehabilitation work in
order to conform to standards of the Redevelopment Plan and other
local ordinances, the Agency will notify the property owner in
writing of its intention to require an Owner Participation Agree-
ment to cover the work required, will provide a description of the
rehabilitation work necessary, and will provide a copy of the
proposed Owner Participation Agreement.
' Y} ♦v
ti
"1
}f-
t
i
4
SECTION 7 . 0 CERTIFICATES OF CONFORMITY
r
The Agency may determine that certain real property within the
Project Area presently meets the requirements of the Redevelopment
Plan and the owners of such property will be permitted to remain as
conforming owners without an Owner Participation Agreement with
the Agency, provided such owners continue to operate, use and
i. maintain the real property within the requirements of the Redevelop-
ment Plan. In such cases, the Agency will issue a Certificate of
Conformity, stipulating that the Agency shall not acquire, through
the use of eminent domain, the conforming property, and specifying
that the owners of such conforming property will be exempt from
Owner Participation Agreement provisions of the plan with respect
to that conforming property. In the event that any of the conform-
ing owners or their successors in interest desire to construct any
additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing
structures on any of the real property described above as conform-
ing, or desire to acquire additional property within the Project
Area, such conforming owners may be required to enter into an
Owner Participation Agreement with the Agency in the same manner
j as required for other owners .
• �%n {v ii
SECTION 8 . 0 PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING A CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY
Any owner of improved property within the Project Area may at any
time after the effective date of the Redevelopment Plan apply to
the Agency for a Certificate of Conformity. The Agency will ,
within sixty (60) days of receipt of such application, inspect
and/or otherwise examine, the property on which the application
was made, for purposes of determining its conformity to provisions
of the Redevelopment Plan.
Upon completion of the inspection and/or evaluation, and upon its
determination of conformity, the Agency will issue to the con-
forming owner in a form suitable for recordation, a Certificate
of Conformity.
Should the Agency ' s inspection and/or evaluation of the property
result in a determination that the property does not meet 4--he re-
quirements of the Redevelopment Plan, the Agency will notify the
property owner in writing of those improvements or other work
necessary to bring the property into conformance with the Plan,
and whether an Owner Participation Agreement will be required.
The Agency will issue its determination of conformity within 120 days of receipt
of the application. The Agency may, withthe consent of the applicant, withhold
issuance of such determination to a mutually acceptable date.
SECTION 9 . 0 AMENDMENT OF OWNER PARTICIPATION RULES
The Agency may amend these Rules at any meeting held after their
adoption. Any amendments after the filing of statements of intent
shall be made only after notice to the persons who have filed such
statements . Such notice shall be by mail posted at least four-
teen (14) days before the date of the meeting at which the proposed
amendment will be considered. The Agency will hold at least two public
hearings prior to adoption of any amendments. The resolution adopting any
amendment shall not become effective until thirty days after adoption.
DATE APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO. �!
:: ..............
44
H CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
`:+ �%y"•.' HUNTING TON BEACH,
Bud Belsito, Executive Director-:: From Ed Selic
To
fi of _the: Redevelopment.Agency.� r�sr 4 Acting Planning Director
"4 Subject . Addendum to -Owner, Participation ' Date ' August 13,`1-1976
Rules
Attached are five minor changes to the Owner Participation Rules recommended
y the Project Area Committee at their August 12, 1976 meeting . The Staff
!.�'--r'?..concurs with the changes and recommends they be included as part,,of
Exhibit A for the Agency. Resolution No. 6.
the PAC and Staff discussed how to make owners and tenants in the
;4,:L: ;': Project Area cognizant of the rules. It- was determined that a public
44C,-4;'.information program should- be:.developed in addition to the mandatory -k;
.". ;af,�'-'notification processes.' As an immediate step, the Downtown Merchants
r�"-"- Guild will receive copies of the rules and opportunities to obtain ex-
;'",• planations. In addition, owner participants from other project areas
4'
will be invited to- PAC meetings to share their experiences. Staff will
also be developing other methods to communicate the owner•J; ;.; p g participants
;;�-;."- . procedures to project area owners and tenants.
t
'i >: Enclosure:.:.:_Addendum to Owner Participation Rules
EDS: j a
Enclosure
�{tit• '- ' -
YVg ~i
F _
ADDENDUM TO DRAFT RULES GOVERNING
PARTICIPATION BY AND PREFERENCES OF
OWNERS, OPERATORS OF BUSINESSES AND
TENANTS IN THE HUNTINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
Section 2. 1. 2, Line 7: Correct spelling "Properties"
Section 5. 0, paragraph 4, line 7 : . Change to read " . . . . . ..national
origin, age, or ancestry. "
Section 6. 0, paragraph 2. Add to end: "One or more. meetings shall
be held with all respondees to explain participation procedures. "
Section 8 .0. Add paragraph 4: "The Agency will issue its determination
of conformity within 120 days of receipt of the application. The
Agency may, with the consent of the applicant, withhold issuance of
such determination to a mutually acceptable date. "
Section 9 . 0. Add to end of paragraph: "The Agency will hold at
least two public hearings prior to adoption of any amendments. The
resolution adopting any amendment shall not become effective until
thirty (30) days after adoption. "
F
RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION BY AND PREFERENCES
OF OWNERS, OPERATORS OF BUSINESSES,
AND TENANTS IN THE HUNTINGTON BEACH DOWNTOWN
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
Prepared By
Huntington Beach Department of Planning
and Environmental Resources
(Redevelopment Agency Staff)
and
Urban Projects Incorporated
Consultants to the Redevelopment Agency
July, 1976
Revised August 4 , 1976
6 aj�+.nC•l.�tx'.lJ:`'•i*':L'•.::fca:�w'?.:
4
irn
SECTION 3. 0 PREFERENCE FOR RE-ENTRY OF PERSONS
ENGAGED IN BUSINESS WITHIN THE
PROJECT AREA
3. 1 In any case where as a result of activities of the
Agency in implementing the Redevelopment Plan for
the Project Area it is necessary to temporarily re-
locate an existing business (or businesses) from a
particular location within the Project Area , such
business shall be given a preference to relocate
in such location.
3. 2 In any case where as a result of activities of the
Agency in implementing the Redevelopment Plan for
the Project Area it is necessary to permanently re-
locate an existing business from a particular location
within the Project Area , the Agency shall grant that
business a preference to relocate in some other
location within the Project Area .
3 . 4 The following are the minimum requirements which must
be met by any business to establish its eligibility
for the preferences set forth in these Rules :
5
(1) The business use proposed shall be consistent with
the land use standards of the Redevelopment Plan
for the Project Area.
(2) Any existing structures or improvements which are
to remain in the Project Area shall have been con-
structed under the auspices of approved building
plans and permits . All new structures or improve-
ments shall meet the current building and safety
laws and regulations applicable in the City.
(3) The owner shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of
the Agency that he is financially capable of per-
forming any and all modifications or rehabilitations
or modernization on the existing property in order
that it will conform to the Redevelopment Plan.
(4) The business shall agree in writing that in the use ,
occupancy and conduct of business on the premises
there shall be no discrimination because of race ,
sex, color , creed, religion, national origin or
ancestry.
f. VY
�+ to
AMk
n
6
L
meeting the requirements of these Rules , including the
redevelopment standards incorporated herein, shall be
entitled to receive a certificate upon the completion
of such improvements to their properties as may be. re-
quired under these Rules and the standards of the Re-
development Plan for the Project Area.
2 . 4 Certificate Standards and Procedures
Each owner desiring to. participate in the Project Area
will be required to enter into a Participation Agreement
with the Agency. Each Participation Agreement will con-
tain provisions necessary to insure that the Participation
Agreement will be carried out , and that the owner ' s prop-
erty will be developed or used in accordance with the
conditions , restrictions , rules and regulations of the
Redevelopment Plan and the Participation Agreement .
Each Participation Agreement will require the participant
to join in the recordation of such documents as the
Agency may require in order to insure such development
and use.
The following are ,t O�Ints that must be
met concerni r o o a Participation
Agreement :
•�
(a) Any exist ng structures or improvements which are
to remain in the Project Area shall have been con-
structed under the auspices of approved building
plans and permits . All new structures or improve-
ments shall meet the current building and safety
laws and regulations applicable in the City.
(b) The improvements as existing or rehabilitated
shall conform to ' the Redevelopment Plan for the
Project Area .
(c) The owner shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of
the Agency that he is financially capable of per-
forming any and all modifications or rehabilitation
or modernization on the existing property in order
that it will conform to the Redevelopment Plan.
(d) The participating owner shall execute a Partic-
ipation Agreement in -which he shall agree to proceed
with the redevelopment of the property involved in
accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. In the
Participation Agreement , a particpating owner shall
agree to remove , demolish, alter , improve or re-
habilitate existing structures and improvements on
the property involved and to thereafter use and
maintain the same in such manner as shall be
3
required by said Redevelopment Plan.
(e) In the Participation Agreement , a participating
owner shall agree to remove or permit the Agency
to remove any and all restrictions existing against
the property involved which are contrary to those
contained in the Redevelopment Plan or the Part-
icipation Agreement and to impose or permit the
Agency to impose restrictions of record restricting
the use of the property involved to uses and develop-
ment consistent with the Redevelopment Plan and
Participation Agreement .
(f) In the Participation Agreement , a participating
owner or business tenant shall agree to insert into
and make a part of any lease , rental agreement ,
occupancy permit , use or sales agreement pertaining
to the property involved or any other document per-
taining to the property or use thereof, a provision
that there shall be no restrictions imposed thereon
because of race , sex, color , creed , religion ,
national origin, or ancestry.
(g) In the Participation Agreement , if a participating
owner agrees to remove , demolish , alter , improve ,
or rehabilitate existing structures and improvements
on the property involved , he shall also agree to do
such within specified time limits established by
the Agency. If the participating owner agrees to
construct new structures and/or improvements on the
property involved or to remove , demolish , alter , .
improve or rehabilitate existing property, he shall
agree to do so only after plans , specifications and
artist ' s renderings of the buildings have been
presented to and approved by the Agency. He shall
also agree to perform such construction, after said
approval , within specified time limits established
by the Agency.
AOKI,, 4
ORDINANCE No. 1285
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
AMENDING THE HUNTINGTON BEACH ORDINANCE CODE
BY ADDING CHAPTER 50 AND ARTICLES AND SECTIONS
THERETO, DECLARING A NEED FOR A REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY TO FUNCTION IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON
BEACH, AND DECLARI M THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID
CITY TO BE THE AGENCY.
WHEREAS, there exists within the City of Huntington
Beach blighted areas as defined in Chapter 1, Article 3 of
Part I. Division 24, of the California Health and Safety Code,
which Part I of said Division 24 of said Code is known as the
Community Redevelopment; and
WHERE®S, Section 33100 of the Community Redevelopment
Law created in the City of Huntington Beach, a public body,
corporate and politic for the purpose of exercising the powers
granted by the Community Redevelopment Law, but providmd, pur-
suant to Section 33101 thereof, that said public body corporate
and politic shall not transact any business or exercise any
powers unless, by Ordinance, the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach declares there is a need for such agency to
function;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City COuncK of
the City of Huntington Beech, as followas
Section 1. That Chapter 50, entitled "MWEVELOPKENT
AGENCY" is hereby added to the Huntington Beach Ordinance (ode,
to read in words and figures as followss
1.
CHAPTER 50
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Section 2. That Article 501 is hereby added to Chapt-
er 50 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, to read in
words and figures, as follows :
ARTICLE 501 - "REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY"
Section 3. That the following sections are hereby
added to Article 501 of Chapter 50 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Code, to read in words and figures as follows:
Section 5011. It is hereby found and declared, pursuant to
Section 33101 of the Community Redevelopment
Law, that there is a need for the Redevelopment Agency created
by Section 33100 of said law to function in the City of Hunt-
ington Beach, and said Agency is hereby authorized to transact
business and exercise its powers under the Community Redevelop-
ment Law,
Section 5012. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 33200 of
"- the Community Redevelopment Law, this body here-
by declares itself to be the Agency provided in Section 5011
hereof and that all the rights, powers, duties, privileges and
immunities vested by the Community Redevelopment Law in such
Agency shall be, and are, vested in this body.
Section 4. The Redevelopment Agency hereby authorized
to function shall cause a certified copy of this ordinance to
be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of California.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the pass-
age and adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to
be published by one insertion in the Huntington Beach News, a
weekly newspaper printed, published and circulated in the City
2.
Ord. No. 1285
Of Huntington Beach, California, and thirty (30) days there-
after the same shall take effect and be in force.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach, California, this 16th day of January
1967.
r"
l MayWt
ATTEST:
y er
APPROVED AS TO RM
B
City At
STATE Uf• i':1 t•'UH\lA
COUNTY OF UIlANGE ) ss
CITY OV 111;NT I NG1 0\ BEACH
1 , Pat C ,' JO ES , the duly elected, qualified and
acting Ci t %- (' i (.i,k of the City of Huntington Beach, and ex-
offic.io I: l ,irk of the City Council of said City , do hereby
(:(.rr i f y tha ; i iic whole number of members of the City Council
of the city of (luntington Beach is seven ; that the foregoing
resolution was passed and adopted by the affirmative vote of
more than a majority of all the members of said City Council
at a regular- all-t, t.ing thereof held on the 16th day of January
1967 by the following vote :
AYES : Councilmen:
Shipley
Coen Bartlett Gisler , Kaufman,/ Green, Stewart
NOES : Councilmen:
None
ABSEN`r : Councilmen:
HP&a `
City Clerk ap& ex-officio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
The forgoing instrument is a true and correct
I. PAUL C. JONES, CITY CLERK of the City of Copy of the original on file in this office
Huntington Beach and ex-officio Clerk of the City
:ounch, do hereby certify that this ordinance has Attest
been blished in the Huntington Beach News on
xr.� � �. ......... 19
In ordance with tiff City Charter of said City.
_ CITY CLERK AND EX-OFFIC LERK OF THE CITY COUNCI(
-y - City Clerk OF THE CITY OF HUNTINSTON BEACH, CALIF.
Deputy City Clerk
�
L
STATEMENT OF FACTS
ROSTER OF PUBLIC AGCN[{ES FILING
(Pursuant to Chapter 1805, Statutes of 1963,
�'i`ich changes the Covarument Code Section 53051)
TO: Secretary of State
Sacramento, California 95814
_____________
(File Stamp)
).egal Name of Public 88eocy: R�deV�J�pment Agency
Official Mailing Address of Public Agency: |Unt CA__92648
Name and Address of Each Member of Governing Board:
MUM
Name: Address 1121 Park-St. , Huntinqton Beach, CA
92648
l e r L�
Name: Alicia M. Wentworth Ad6rcae� 7801 Ellis Avenue, Huntington Beach, CA
----' '--------- -------- ---'------------------ 648
M�mber�:
Name: Bob M�ndic �ddzaao� llS 17th Street, Huntington Beach, CA
-- -- -'---------'-------9eb48
Name: Ron R. p�ttin�o� ��Greae� 20601 Elizabeth Lane, Huntington Beach
------�--------------------'----------' -----�------�-------------'----'- 646
Name: John A. Thomas �d6r�ma: 19782 S��Oi� Q L Huntington Beach
------------��--- — --�-----� W048
Uume: Ruth 8ai]ey �ddraao� 5641 Marshall Drive, Huntington Beach
9Z649
Name: ClaOcy Yoder ��Jraum; 21120 Sailors Bay Lane, Huntington Beach
----------��—'--��- -��--------------� 92648
4/30/79
-------'-----'---------''-----'------
8
Clerk
I1 the name of the agency Is !,uiu8 changed, or if two or more previously recorded agencies
are consolidating into one, please indicate the full .information at the hnctom of the new
filing` listing all agency names involved.
CORPORATE DIVISION
, Legal Review (918)445-0820
Certification (916)445-1430
Status
(916)445-2900 '
Office of the Secretary of State 1230 J Street Microfilm Records (916)445-1768
March Fong Eu Sacramento, California 95814 Name Availability (916)322-2387 '
>� Trademarks (016)445-9872
Statement of Officers (916)445-2020
April 26, 1979
City of Huntington Beach
P.O.Box 190
Huntington Beach, Ca.92648
The enclosed Statement of Facts/Letter, which was forwarded by your district pursuant
to Government Code Section 53051, is being returned to you for the reason indicated
below. Please resubmit the statement in proper order for filing in this office.
Statement incomplete - address of district not shown.
Statement incomplete - names and/or addresses of each member of governing
body not shown.
Statement incomplete - a complete Statement of Facts, giving the full legal
name of the agency/district, the official mailing address of the district
and the names and addresses of the entire governing board, must be submitted
each time there is a change of any kind.
Statement covers a city or county: Under subject section of the Government
Code, cities and counties are not required to file a Statement of Facts with
the Secretary of State's Office. DO NOT RESUBMIT STATEMEPiT.
The name of the district which appears on the enclosed statement differs from
the name in our records, although it seems to be the same-district. Since
this statement does not specifically indicate a name change, unification of
districts, etc. , please clarify.
The name shown on our records is
Please have form signed and return to this office for #iling.
Original signature please.
M s. Rose Ma. Machado
Legal Docum Examiner
rmm
Sec/State D110
13
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
g OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
April 18, 1979
Ms. March Fong Eu
Secretary of State
1230 J Street
Sacramento, California 95814
Dear Ms. Eu:
Pursuant to Government Code 53051 , the City Council who also serves
as the Redevelopment Agency, changed composition as follows:
Ron R. Pattinson
John A. Thomas
Bob Mandic
Don MacAllister
Ruth Bailey
Clancy Yoder
If this office may be of further service to you in this matter, please
do not hesitate to call .
Sincerely ,
J. ,
v/
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
AMW:CB:es
1
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO.1
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1, made and entered into
this azS day of , 19760 by and between the
HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a body corporate and
politic in the City of Huntington Beach, California (hereinafter
called "Agency") , and URBAN PROJECTS, INC. , a California corpora-
tion, located at 10850 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1950, Los Angeles ,
California 90024 (hereinafter called "Consultant") to that
certain Agreement heretofore entered into between the parties
dated March 3, 1976,
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS the parties have heretofore entered into an agreement
for the provision of certain services by Consultant to Agency; and
The agreement as originally entered into contained a limi-
tation on Agency's liability for payment and upon Consultant's
right to receive compensation for services; and
The original Agreement contained a limitation of time for
performance of such services and the parties mutually desire to
Increase the aforesaid funding limitation and to enlarge upon
the time for performance,
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties covenant and agree as follows :
1. Paragraph III Time of Completion of the Agreement
dated March 3, 1976 is amended to delete in lines one and two thereof
the words "six calendar months" and to substitute therefor the
words "nine calendar months" .
Z. Paragraph IV - Consultant 's Compensation of the Agreement
dated March 3, 1976 is amended by deleting from line four thereof
the figures "$10,000. 00" and by substituting therefor the figures, >
WSA ; er 1. )
"$25, 000. 00".
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Supple-
mental Agreement No. 1 the day, month and year first above
written.
Mayor for HUNTINGTON BEACH
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ATTEST.
01.
City ler for edevelopment
Agency
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
05P`Coy torrrey acting aprXgal
,e
unsel for Redevelop " Agency
.44.e
—Actin C y min s rator
APPRO ED BY IN ATI G DEPARTMENT:
URBAN PROJECTS, INC.
By wee
E vePle'll r e s I
d
2.
' 1
A G R E E M E N T
JJ THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
1976, by and between the HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOP-
MENT AGENCY, a body corporate and politic in the City of Huntington
Beach, California (hereinafter called "Agency" ) , and URBAN PROJECTS ,
INC. , a California corporation, located at 10850 Wilshire Boulevard,
Suite 1950, Los Angeles, California 9.0024 (hereinafter called
"Consultant") .
W I T N E S S E T H
I. RECITALS:
WHEREAS, Agency desires to prepare a Redevelopment Plan
and program and establish a Redevelopment Project area within the
City of Huntington Beach;
WHEREAS , in order to accomplish this purpose, it is
necessary to obtain the services of a firm qualified in the field
of redevelopment, planning, and consulting;
WHEREAS, consultant is a firm with experienced and - skilled
personnel qualified to render consulting services in connection
with establishing redevelopment agencies, project area and related
activities;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby mutually agree as follows :
II . SERVICES - SCOPE OF WORK
Upon specific request the Agency Contracting Officer (hereinafter
referred to as "ACO") or his designated representative, Consultant
shall attend meetings , prepare work programs, prepare financial
and economic analyses , provide criteria, . guidance and advice on
the preparation of a Redevelopment Plan. .`.'Such work shall be per-
formed in a logical sequence, and delivered to Agency in written
letter, memorandum and verbal communication as appropriate to the
request and the subject matter. Consultant shall use those of its
staff members who in its judgment are best qualified to carry out
the work. Consultant shall be given reasonable notice of required
. attendance at meetings . ACO will keep Consultant reasonably informed
of schedules, programs in which it is expected to participate, and
IV
shall promptly furnish information to Consultant as needed in the
performance of Consultant' s work.
III. TIME OF COMPLETION
Consultant' s work shall extend over a period of six calendar
months from the original date of authorization. This contract
shall terminate on that date unless otherwise extended by mutual
consent of the parties. The date of authorization shall be the
date of execution of this Agreement by Agency ' s duly authorized
representative.
IV. CONSULTANT'S COMPENSATION
As full payment for services to be rendered under this Agreement,
Consultant shall be paid in the amounts and at the times described
in this paragraph. For the services described above under paragraph II ,
Consultant shall be paid at a total cost not to exceed $10, 000 . 00
for the time of personnel employed to carry out the work at the
hourly rates listed in Exhibit A, attached hereto, entitled "Billing
Rates" . The hourly rates listed cover Consultant' s personnel costs,
office overhead, profit, local communication expenses between
Consultant and the Agency, and local travel of Consultant' s personnel .
Within ten (10) days after the end of each calendar month following
the date of this Contract, Consultant shall submit an itemized invoice
to ACO listing the name, title of personnel and hours spent rendering
the services called for, and the charges therefore, computed at the
rates shown in Exhibit A attached. Agency shall pay Consultant' s
invoices within a reasonable time after receipt of said invoices.
In addition to the hourly rates described above, Consultant
shall be reimbursed at his actual cost for local communication
expenses in connection with solicitations, reproduction in quantity
of solicitation letters, offerings, brochures, plans and other
materials (other than ordinary letters and memos) required in
carrying out the assignment and for any travel or communication
expenses outside of the Los Angeles area, said travel or communication
expenses subject to prior written approval by the ACO. Consultant
shall be reimbursed at cost for any subcontract services paid for
by Consultant, required from planners, designers, engineers, graphics
specialists, etc. Subcontract services shall receive prior written
approval by the ACO.
-2-
V. TERMINATION
Either party may terminate this Agreement upon thirty days
written notice to the other. In the event of such termination by
Agency, Consultant shall be compensated for all prior authorized services
performed and expenses incurred to the date of termination less
any amounts theretofore paid by Agency. In the event of termination
by Consultant, Consultant shall be compensated for its services
and expenses incurred to the date of termination as reflected in
a written report prepared by Consultant addressed to the Agency
specifying the reasons for termination and the services rendered
up to that point. Upon termination, all completed work shall become
the property of the Agency.
VI. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
Agency reposes personal confidence in Consultant and has
contracted for the personal service of Consultant. Accordingly,
Consultant shall not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose
of this Agreement or any title or interest therein nor sublet nor
sub-contract any of the work provided for herein without first ob-
taining written consent from the Agency Director.
VII . NOTICES
Notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by United
States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the parties hereto as
follows:
A. Redevelopment Agency for Huntington Beach
Attention: Planning Director
City of Huntington Beach
Post Office Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648
B. Urban Projects, Inc.
10850 Wilshire Boulevard - Suite 1050
Los Angeles , California 90024
-3-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this Agreement the day, month and year first above written.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ATTEST:
Con acting Officer
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk or Clerk of the
Redevelopment Agency
By 7" C c?x
Deputy City Clerk AS TO FORM:
City Cit Uell
Huntington Beach,
acting as legal c for the
Redevelopment Agervy
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
City Administrator
City of Huntington Beach
URBAN PROJECTS, INC. , a California
Corporation
By: CC
EXHIBIT A
URBAN PROJECTS, INC.
BILLING RATE SCHEDULE (PER HOUR)
Current
Rate
President $75. 00
Executive Vice President $70 . 00
Senior Vice President $65 .00
Community Development Specialist $45 . 00
Senior' Associate $35. 00
Associate $30 .00
Senior Analyst $30. 00
Analyst $25. 00
Graphics $20 . 00
Research Assistant $15. 00
Steno/Secretarial/Typist $12 . 00
NOTE:
1. Rates include salaries, employee benefits, office operating
expenses and fee.
2 . Reimbursable expenses are, .in addition to the above time charges ,
and include air fares, hotels and motels, meals , car rentals,
taxis, long distance telephone calls, special delivery charges,
and costs of procuring special research materials (i.e. maps
and outside electronic data processing) . All items are reim-
bursed at cost and will be reimbursed by Agency only when
approved in advance and in writing by the ACO.
3. Printing costs for printing of reports in excess of six (6)
copies shall be invoiced to Agency at Consultant ' s actual
reproduction cost.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE
OF REGULAR MEETINGS, APPOINTING OFFICERS AND
PROVIDING FOR USE OF SERVICES AND FACILITIES OF
CITY DEPARTMENTS
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, acting
as the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach,
does hereby resolve as follows :
SECTION 1 . That regular meetings of said Redevelopment
Agency shall be held every first and third Monday of each month
at the hour of 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers in City Hall,
2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, and that in all
respects meetings of said Redevelopment Agendy shall be governed
by and be in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (California.
Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ) . Except as otherwise
provided by the Community Redevelopment Law (California Health
and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq. ) , the rules of procedure
for the City Council as set forth in the Charter of said City
shall also apply to the City Council acting as the Redevelopment
Agency insofar as such rules can be made applicable.
SECTION 2. The Mayor of the City of Huntington Beach shall
act ex officio as the Chairman of said Agency.
SECTION 3 . The Vice Mayor of the City of Huntington Beach
shall act ex officio as the Vice Chairman of said Agency.
SECTION 4 . The City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach
shall act ex officio as the Clerk of said Agency.
SECTION 5 . The City Treasurer of the City of Huntington
Beach shall act ex officio as the Treasurer of said Agency, and
shall keep the moneys of said Agency in the City Treasury but
separate and apart from moneys of the City.
SECTION 6 . The City Attorney of the City of Huntington Beach
shall act ex officio as the legal adviser to the Agency.
er 1.
SECTION 7 . The City Administrator of the City of Huntington
Beach shall act ex officio as the chief executive officer of
said Agency and as such shall be responsible for the administration
` of such Agency business as by law is not required to be directly
administered by such Agency.
SECTION 8. The Planning Director of the City of Huntington
Beach shall be the Redevelopment Director of said Agency and as
such shall be responsible for direction of the Agency' s daily
activities and shall serve as primary staff support to the
Redevelopment Agency and Redevelopment Commission.
SECTION 9. Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code
Section 33128 , for the purposes of the Agency. it shall have
access to the services and facilities of the Planning Commission,
the City Engineer, the Finance Department, and other departments
and offices of the City .
SECTION 10. The City of Huntington Beach may charge the
Agency the reasonable value of services rendered by City staff
to the Agency, and Agency shall pay to the City upon demand re-
imbursement for such services at such time or times as the Agency
has funds available for this purpose . Such reimbursement moneys
shall be deposited in the General Fund of the City .
SECTION 11. This resolution amends Resolution No. 1 of the
Redevelopment Agency.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th
day of July, 1976.
Chairman
ATTEST
Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Actin Chief Executive Officer �S;,=-Z, "4,a
r;;��
2. tl�
K
APPROV , TIATING D PARTMENT:
NO FISCAL IMPACT VZ
FISCAL IMPACT -- BUDGETED
FISCAL IMPACT -- NOT BUDGETED
REQUIRES FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT
3 •
rr ,�
i Res . No. 5
-ITAI'E OF CALIF013NIA )
i'�IUNTY OF ORANGE )
I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY
(;EPTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a
input i ni7, of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 6t1L day of
July ) 1976 , and that it was so adopted by the
roilowi.ng vote :
AYES : Members :
Bartlett, Pa t i n cnn, CnAn. S i phPrt, Shpnk a n DZ40dar
NOFS: Members :
None
AIR ENT : Members :
Gibbs � � .....
J.
Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach
Ab
RESOLUTION NO. 4
. A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING A PLANNING
SERVICES CONTRACT WITH URBAN PROJECTS, INC.
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington
Beach is engaged in redevelopment planning studies and the
Agency has generated a need for planning consultant services;
and
The Agency is engaging the services of Urban Projects, Inc .
on a time-and-material basis to satisfy this need, and Agency and
Urban Projects, Inc . desire to increase the dollar limitation
thereof,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach does resolve as follows :
A Supplemental Agreement between the Agency and Urban Projects,
Inc . for the increase in the funding limitation of the existing
agreement for planning services which is attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" is approved.
The Mayor of the City of Huntington Beach, a member
of this Agency, is hereby authorized to execute a supplemental
agreement on behalf of the Agency, and the City Clerk of the
City of Huntington Beach is hereby authorized to attest such
document on behalf of the Agency.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the
21st day of June, 1976.
Mayor for
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Huntington Beach
ATTEST:
City Clerk
for Redevelopment Agency
WSA:er 1.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ,
oplCounsel
City Attorney acting st a ga
for Redevelop t Agency
Actin City Administrator
APPROVED, INITIATING DEPARTMENT:
NO FISCAL IMPACT
FISCAL IMPACT--- BUDGETED
FISCAL IMPACT -- NOT BUDGETED
REQUIRES FINANCIAL IMPACT REPORT
2.
• Res . No. 4
-TATE OF CALIFORNIA )
''MINTY OF ORANGE )
I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY
CEIN'TIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a
meet i niT of said Redevelopment Agency held on the list day of
June , 197.fL_, and that it was so adopted by the
following vote :
AYES : Members :
Bartlett, Pattinson, Gibbs, Siebert.Shenkman, Wieder
NOES : Membern :
None
Al SENT : Member-- :
Coen
Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach
RESOLUTION NO . 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AKENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUN`1'INGTON BEACH APPROVING AND AUTHOR-
IZING THE EXECUTION Of A PLANNING SERVICES CHN-
TRACT WITH URBAN PROJECTS , INC .
WHEREAS , the Rpdevelnpment Arrency "r Lhr. City of Huntington
Beach is engaged in redevelopmont r:)l ann i n, nLud i es and the Agency
has generated a. npeci Por pl anni nF ennsu I tint ner•v_i ees ; and
The Agency drpi r oK to Pn;yro t:iw . Pvv ; ,..ez nr Ur ran
Projects , Inc . on n t1mP-Nnil-r1i(_lW v1N1 hnsiv W nat; isfy thK''
need,
NOW, THEREPONE, tho Radpv ' lopmenh A-rPH Y nr the City of
Huntington Beach dnr n res"l.ve as Pol w s :
1 . The aprt'C'r` eHt WtlNpeH tho Avency Nnd ttrhan Projects ,
Inc . for the provision or pinnn i nr', services which is attached
hereto as Exhi b L t A in approved .
2 . The mayor of the City of Hunt i nrton Beach , a member
of this Agency , is hprehy authorized to execute the agreement on
behalf of the A:rency , ;and the City Clerk of t.hn City of Huntington
Beach is hereby authorized to attest such cl.- numont; an behalf of
the Arr.ency . The Pl jinn i nF Di r oc unr PP the City of Huntington
T t i 3 1 ffice b
Be?_Ci1 l.S f"lerEJV a.l,, ,,}rc�r>iz:�•,1 t,r; l.'• (•i.ri„?�;i('i; lrlt; O) ) ) .r OT`1 F--
half of the Agency fnr pur,norp nV this Nrreempnt . The City
Attorney of the city or Hunhl t1;' ; o" jj;,lich is nut;hnPi zed to act a.:
legal counsel to t.h Redr•vo 1 oom: "Y A(r: ney N"d to approve. he
agreement a2 to rnr•m .
3 . The i'i nanc! Direrttir or rho city or HunLi nrton Beach
hereby authorized to Qnnurn 'rnd mn 1 rl n n he Ai , '�- d l rn t o I t: -'� rli. � rl.i rl 1 :%t: '1 V
Fund , and ,i) disI))apsp t 1 ..rams requirad } •term t h
Obligation to Urban Prui( aLn , [ c . upon car't. iP entioH or the
' 1 .
wSA : aiab
Planning; Director that ,-,aid :.um i c due and pa,yal
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Afrency of the
City of Hunti.nFton Beach ,)t a refr,ular meet1rifr, thoreof held on
the 3rd day of March -----' 1976 . —
CMayor for
Redevelopment Agency of the
ATTEST: City of Huntington Beach
APPROVED AS TO P ORM:
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk
for Redevelopment Aency ,By: c. �� /l i+-fry- .�/ �/J�a-L�y
Deputy ,�.�A'' Ci ty to e acting;
�e al coun'; Redevelopment
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Agency
APPROVED , INITIATING DEPARTMENT :
City Administrator
NO FISCAL IMPACT
FISCAL fh9PArT _- ( '. !'D`:F
FISCAL
REQUIRES FINXNC' i;-1.,L ;iY,r--;; r REPORT.-_
Res No . 3
",TME OF CALIF011,'NTA
k't)UNTY 01� ORANGE
1 , ALICIA M. WENT Woit",T;1-1 , Secretary of the Redevelopme!il.
Agr-nc.v of the Olt:; of Hunttnc�ton Beach , California, DO HEREIq_Y
('E','T_rLI','Y that the f'ol'e,-oinfr re,,-olution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment Aitoncv of the '..ity of Huntington Beach at a
meet llni7 of Agency held on the 'Ard —day of
March 1117 6 -, ;and that it was so adopted by the
following vote :
AYES : Memtlers :
Bartlett, Coen, Duke, Gibbs
NOES): Member'!
More
A15SENT : Memhp,,:-
Wieder, gatney, Shipley
Alicia M. Wentworth
Secretary of the Redevelopment
A,;-.ent,y of the City of
Huntington Beach
By 4. ltiDeputy
RESOLUTION NO . 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ESTABLISHING A REDEVEL-
OPMENT AGENCY ADMINISTRATIVE FUND, AND AUTHOR-
IZING ACCEPTANCE AND REIMBURSEMENT TO THE CITY
OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OF MONEY ADVANCED TO IT BY
SAID CITY IN THE FORM OF A LOAN
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington
Beach is engaged in redevelopment planning studies and- the dis-
semination of redevelopment information; and
The Agency is without necessary funds to accomplish these
tasks; and
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach. has by
resolution authorized a loan to the Agency for these purposes ;
and
The Agency is required. to meet certain terms and conditions
imposed .by the City Council in order to qualify for such loan,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach does resolve as follows :
1. The Agency hereby establishes a Redevelopment Agency
Administrative Fund.
2. The Agency agrees to borrow from the City of Huntington
Beach the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000. 00) ,and. to place
such amount in the Administrative Fund .
3. The Agency agrees that the amount so borrowed shall
be repaid to City at such time or times as the Agency has funds
available for such purpose .
4 . The Finance Director of the City of Huntington Beach
is authorized to administer the fund . The Finance Director is ,
further authorized to disburse funds .from the Administrative
... 1 .
WSA: ahb
r• �
:l
Fund at the express direction of the Agency and not otherwise .
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on
the 1st day of March, 1976 .
Mayor for
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Huntington Beach
,„. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney, ac ng s
for Redevelopment Agency legal or
for t W S�
Redevelopment Age
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED, INITIATING DEPARTMENT:
/. Qj
City Administrator
NO FISCAL IMPACT
FISCAL IMPACT BUDGETED
FISCAL I�r� �,�,�;; _. ,.; =UDG�TEDD
REQUIRES FINANCIAL 'HMIPACT REPORT
2 .
Res . No. 2
STATE OF CALIFORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY
C'U"11IFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment: Agency of the City of Huntington Beach .at a
rneet i n�; of said Redevelopment Agency held on the . lst day of
March , 197 6 , and that it was so adopted by the
following vote :
AYES : Members :
Bartlett, Wieder, Coen, Duke, Gibbs
NOES Memberr, :
None
ABSENT: Memberc :
Matney, Shipley
01
Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of .the City of
Huntington Beach
RESOLUTION NO. 1
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIXING THE TIME AND
PLACE OF REGULAR MEETINGS, APPOINTING OFFICERS
AND PROVIDING FOR USE OF SERVICES AND FACILITIES
OF -CITY DEPARTMENTS
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, acting
as the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach,
does hereby resolve as follows :
SECTION 1 . That regular meetings of said Redevelopment
Agency shall be held every first and third Monday of each month
at the hour of 7 p .m. in the Council Chambers in City Hall ,
2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California ; and that in all
respects meetings of said Redevelopment Agency shall be governed
by and be in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (California
Government Code Sections 54950 et seq. ) . Except as otherwise
provided by the Community Redevelopment Law -(California Health
and Safety Code Sections 33000 et seq . ) , the rules of procedure
for the City Council as set forth in the Charter of said City
shall also .appl,y to the City Council acting as the Redevelopment
Agency insofar as such rules can be made applicable .
SECTION 2 . The Mayor of the City of Huntington Beach shall
act ex officio as the Chairman of said Agency .
SECTION 3 . The Vice Mayor of the City of Huntington Beach
shall act ex officio as the Vice Chairman of. said Agency .
SECTION 4 . The City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach
shall act ex officio as the Secretary of said Agency..
SECTION 5 . The City Treasurer of the City of Huntington
Beach shall act ex officio as the Treasurer of said Agency , and
shall keep the moneys of said Agency in. the City Treasury but
1 .
separate and apart from moneys of the .City .
SECTION 6 . The City Attorney of the City of Huntington
Beach shall act ex officio as the legal adviser to the Agency
except that the Agency may employ special counsel to handle
specialized legal work. Such special counsel shall cooperate
with and report to the City Attorney .
SECTION 7 . The City Administrator of the City of
Huntington Beach shall act ex officio as the chief executive
officer of said Agency and as such shall be responsible for the
administration of such Agency business as by law is not required
to be directly administered by such Agency .
SECTION 8 . Pursuant to California Hearth and Safety Code
Section 33128 , for the purposes of the Agency, .it shall have
access to the services and facilities of the Planning Commission,
the. City Engineer, the Finance Department , and other departments
and offices of the City .
SECTION 9 . The City of Huntington Beach ma,y .charge the
Agency the reasonable value of services rendered by City staff
to the Agency , and Agency shall pay to the City upon demand re-
bursement for such services at such time or times as the Agency
has funds available for this purpose . Such reimbursement moneys
shall be deposited in the General Fund of the City .
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on
the lst day of March, 1976 .
Chairman
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO .FORM: .
CL"=,
Secre ary Legal Advise
2.
1
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED, INITIATING DEPARTMENT:
Chief Executive Officer
NO FISCAL IMPACT V
FISCAL iMPACT -- BUDGETED
FISCAL IMPACT -- NOT BUDGETEI)-_.-------
REQUIRES FINANCIAL IMPACT Rem"T---
3 .
, J
• � Res . No . 1
i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach , California, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a
meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 1st day of
March 197 6 , and that it was so adopted by the
following vote :
AYES : Members :
Bartlett, Wieder, Coen, Duke, Gibbs
NOES : Members :
None
ABSENT: Members :
Matney, Shipley
Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach
FRANK M. JORDAN
SECRETARY OF STATE
,,,..
� �• r i
mf „ ' the
ecYeta of State
SACRAMENTO
I, FRANK M. JORDAN Secretary of State of the State
of California, hereby certify:
That on the 16th day of February, 1968, pursuant to the
provisions of Section 33102, Health and- Safety Code, State of
California., relating to Redevelopment Agencies, there was filed
in this office:
A certified copy of Ordinance No. 1285, passed
and adopted by the City Council of the CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH on January 16, 1967, declaring
the need for a Redevelopment Agency. to function
in said city, and declaring the City Council of
said city to-:be the Agency.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set
my hand and affix the Great Seal
of the State of California this
16th day of February, 1968,
FRANK M. JORDAN
Secretary of State
BY.
his P. Sullivan
Assistant Secretary of State
1
I
- 10922-062 6-97 eM OSV
I�
•
•
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
ICOMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Pmmaco. Peat,Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
PE.T, �'I�13WICK, �IITCHELL & CO.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
• 660 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE
NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92660
August 15, 1978
r Mr. Frank B. Arquello
Director of Finance
City of Huntington Beach
• 0. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Dear Mr. Arquello:
In response to your request, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (PM. M&Co. ) is
• pleased to submit our proposal to provide auditing services to the
Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach (Agency)
for an examination of the financial statements of the Agency for the
years ended June 30, 1978. This proposal contains our understanding of
the scope of services to be rendered together with our estimated fee for
performing such services.
SERVICES TO BE RENDERED
Recent changes in the state laws governing redevelopment agencies and
their related projects require direct involvement by independent public
accountants. As auditors for the City for the last two years, we are
well prepared to provide the Agency with the audit services required.
The scope of our proposed examination involves performing sufficient
audit work to enable us to perform an examination of the Agency's financial
statements since inception as of, and for the years ended June 30, 1978.
The objective of our examination of the Agency's financial statements is
to render an opinion thereon.
You can be assured that the proposed scope of our examination is directed
towards meeting the financial reporting needs of the Agency as discussed
above. In this regard, our examination will be performed in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly, will include
such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures
as we consider necessary in the circumstances. Inasmuch as the primary
purpose of our examination is to enable us to express an opinion as to
the financial position and not to perform a detail check of the day-to-day
transactions, you can appreciate that reliance must be placed on adequate
i systems of internal accounting controls as your principal safeguard against
irregularities that may not be disclosed in a test examination.
P. M. M. & CO.
Mr. Frank B. Arquello
City of Huntington Beach
• August 15, 1978
2
FEES
As is true of other professional firms, our fees are based on the time we
ispend on an engagement. We believe that our approach is realistic and
controlled through effective engagement administration and utilization
of staff assigned to the engagement who are knowledgeable of redevelopment
and public sector accounting.
We believe our fees for our examination of the financial statements for
the years ended June 30, 1978 will be $1,250.
The fees we propose above are expressed on a "not to exceed" basis and
include any out-of-pocket expenses we incur. Should our actual time
expended on the engagement be less than anticipated, the Agency will only
be billed for the time incurred and not the stated maximum fee discussed
above.
In making our estimate of fees, we anticipate that the Agency's accounting
records will be completed in a satisfactory fashion and that appropriate
supporting records will be available for our inspection. We also anticipate
that we will receive assistance from Agency personnel in the preparation of
needed workpapers. The degree of such workpaper preparation will, of course,
be mutually agreed upon in advance.
ADDITIONAL MATTERS
We understand that the Agency has not decided as to how it will respond to
section 33080.1 of the California Health and Safety Code. This new section
of law governing redevelopment agencies has posed problems for almost all
California redevelopment agencies. We would be happy to discuss the new
financial reporting requirements imposed by section 33080.1 as we understand
them with the Agency at their convenience. additional work, if any, arising
from the Agency's decision to respond to such new requirements would be
performed at hourly rates commensurate with lees used to develop our estimate
of work set forth above. We would, of course, provide the Agency a full
written proposal for such additional work. The fee for such additional work
would also be expressed on a "not to exceed" basis.
P• M. M. & CO.
`fir. crank 3. Arquello
City of Huntington 3each
August 13 , 1978
3
Should you have an,, questions regarding our understanding of the engagellent ,
we will be oleased to discuss them with ;iou at your convenience. _= our
understanding oL the raaulre:Ilents o= the pr000sed engagement 1s accepta]1e
to you and tale agency, please acknowledge your approval by signing and
returning the attached copy of this letter. We look forward to again
working with you and your staff.
Very truly yours ,
PEAT, `L;kRWiC.Z, MMITC.IE-T 1 Co.
" CLO `"'. cam►'/�
Thomas TN. Snow, Manager
Enclosure
ACCEPTED:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
r
By
Date
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To Gail Hutton, City Attorney & From Connie Brockway, City Clerk
Redevelopment Agency Legal Counsel
Subject 'Vequest for Redevelopment Agency Date March 23, 1989
Records from George Borkowski
Attached is a communication from George M. Borkowski for Redevelopment Agency
records pursuant to G. C. 6250 et. seq.
I am forwarding a copy to the City Treasurer and to Mr. Franz, Deputy
City Administrator.
Please give me any input you consider necessary in this matter.
Thank you.
CB:bt
CC: Don Watson, City Treasurer
Paul Cook, City Administrator
Bob Franz, Deputy City Administrator
Z '7 ?aS
G
/f ti� pi 9F
11377 West Olympic Boulevard
Los Angeles , California 90064
March 21, 1989
Huntington Beach City Hall
Office of the City Clerk
P. 0. Box 190
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Dear Sir or Madam:
Pursuant to the California Public Records Act
(California Government Code Section 6250 , et seq. ) , I hereby
request access to and copies of each and every "public record" as
defined in Government Code Section 6252(d) in the possession or
under the custody or control of the City of Huntington Beach, the
Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach,
or any official , employee, or other agent thereof,
(a) which constitutes all documents prepared
for the City of Huntington Beach and/or the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach by
their auditors and/or accountants for fiscal years 1980
to 1985, inclusive, including, but not limited to, all
financial statements , financial reports , audit results,
management letters , transmittal letters, and any other
written report, advice, or opinion;
(b) which constitutes all records of
investments and/or purchases and/or sales of financial
instruments made by the City of Huntington Beach, the
Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington
Beach, or any official , employee, or other agent thereof
during the fiscal years 1980 to 1985, inclusive . This
request is intended to encompass , but not be limited to,
long- and short-term investments in bonds , treasury
bills , treasury notes , certificates of indebtedness , and
any and all other financial instruments ; and
(c) which constitutes offering materials ,
notices inviting bids, official statements, bond
resolutions, bond covenants, offering circulars, and
bond issues by the City of Huntington Beach and/or the
Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington
Beach during the fiscal years of 1980 to 1985,
inclusive.
Huntington Beach City Hall
Page 2
March 21, 1989
I specifically request that this letter be treated under
the California Public Records Act to permit the maximum access to
the available records within ten (10) working days after your
receipt of this letter . ( See Government Code Section 6256 . ) I
agree to pay reasonable charges for search and copying pursuant
to your regulations and the terms of the applicable statutes so
long as the charges do not exceed the sum of $1, 500 . In the
event such charges would exceed $1, 500 , please call me forthwith
at ( 213) 312-3725 before undertaking the task of copying the
documents involved. If you deem all or any portion of the
records, information, or material requested to be exempt from
disclosure, please supply me with a specific written statement
indicating the portions of the records, inforamtion, or other
materials deleted or withheld, a full statement of your rasons
for refusing access, and specific citations of statutory
authority for your actions .
To expedite this request, I would be willing to discuss
specific instances of deletion or other exemption claims in
advance of a final decision. Also, if you make an initial deter-
mination that certain information within a requested document is
exempt or entitled to confidential treatment , I request that a
copy of the requested document, with the potentially exempt or
confidential information stricken, be released without delay
while a final determination is made.
I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest
opportunity.
Very 1� ou.r_s,
George M. orkows i
ZCHGB7031
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
MUNTINGTON BEACH
To Gail Hutton, City Attorney & From Connie Brockway, City Clerk
Redevelopment Agency Legal Counsel
Subject Request for Redevelopment Agency Date March 23, 1989
Records from George Borkowski
Attached is a communication from George M. Borkowski for Redevelopment Agency
records pursuant to G. C. 6250 et. seq.
I am forwarding a copy to the City Treasurer and to Mr. Franz, Deputy
City Administrator.
Please give me any input you consider necessary in this matter.
Thank you.
CB:bt
CC: Don Watson, City Treasurer
Paul Cook, City Administrator
Bob Franz, Deputy City Administrator
L-A, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
March 27, 1989
George M. Borkowski
11377 West Olympic Boulevard
Los Angeles , California 90064
Dear Mr. Borkowski :
I received your letter of request for Redevelopment Agency
records and have informed the various departments involved .
The City Treasurer ' s office requires additional time due to
the volume of the records requested .
I would appreciate your calling me at your convenience as I
cannot reach you by phone .
Sincerely,
Connie Brockway, CMC
City Clerk
CB :me
(Telephone: 714-536-5227)
is
CITY OF HUNT►_ TON BEACH
TO: —
DEPARTMENT DATE
❑ For your approval. ❑ Per your request.
❑ For your signature. ❑ For your information.
❑ Take appropriate action. ❑ Prepare reply for my signature.
❑ Return with more details. ❑ Answer.
❑ Investigate and report. ❑ Note and return to me.
❑ Note and see me about this ❑ Note and file..
13
Please call: TEIJEPHONE
Mr.
Mrs. A ,
Miss �•/�'�
TIME CALLED.- DAT CAL ED TELEPHONE NO.
I ' S i --37k
ESSA E
�Leje1 "
a sSbj
FROM: p- DEPT.
TRANSMITTAL AND TELEPHONE SLIP
�/6/,*
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH S,�s
INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
PAUL COOK CONNIE BROCKWAY v' /
To CITY ADMINISTRATOR From CITY CLERK
Subject AMEND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Date 1 1 /28/88
RESOLUTION NO. 147 CALLING
FOR 4TH MONDAY AGENCY MEETINGS
Please consider amending Resolution No. 147 which calls for a meeting of the
Redevelopment Agency to be held on the fourth Monday of each month.
Although the meeting may be cancelled, as long as Resolution No. 147 is in
effect a member of the City Clerk' s staff must call the meeting to order,
adjourn the meeting for lack of a quorum and write the minutes of the
"cancelled" meeting. This results in overtime Monday night and extra staff
time to write, print and distribute the minutes of a "cancelled" meeting.
If there is no longer a necessity for the third Redevelopment Agency meeting I.
recommend that Resolution No. 147 be amended to reflect that change. A
meeting can always be scheduled and adjourned to the date selected or a
Special Meeting can be called.
Attachment: Agency Resolution No. 147
1
REQ T FOR CITY COW IL/ _ �a�-� •
REDEVEL PMENT AGENCY A r ION
1
August 7 , 1989
Date
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCI� .
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members p�
Submitted by:
Paul E. Cook, City Administrator
ILI
Prepared by: Richard Barnard, Deputy City Administrator CITY CLE x
Subject: REVISION OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGULARLY
SCHEDULED MEETINGS
Consistent with Council Policy? N Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception �Q
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
Statement of Issue:
Resolution 147 currently provides for three regularly scheduled meetings per month of the
Redevelopment Agency. A new Resolution is being presented which calls for two
regularly scheduled meetings per month.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution J 96) .
Analysis:
It has been brought to the attention of the City Administrator by the City Clerk that
Resolution 147 is in need of revision since the Agency's regularly scheduled meetings are
currently held twice a month rather than three times. This Resolution does not preclude
the Redevelopment.Agency from calling a special meeting at any.time one is needed.
Funding Sources:
Not applicable
Alternative:
Not adopt Resolution a-6 and leave Resolution 147 as currently written.
Attachments:
1. Resolution 147
2. Resolution
PEC/RB:paj
3926a
PIO 4184
t
RESOLUTION NO. 180
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE DAYS OF
REGULAR AGENCY MEETINGS BY DELETING THE FOURTH
MONDAY OF EACH MONTH
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
resolves as follows :
Section 1 of Resolution No . 147 entitled, "A Resolution of
the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach Fixing the
Time and Place of Regular Meetings , Appointing Officers and
Providing for Use of Services and Facilities of City Departments , "
is hereby amended to read as follows :
SECTION 1 . Regular meetings of the
Redevelopment Agency shall be held every
first and third Monday of each month at the
hour of 7 : 00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in
City Hall , 2000 Main Street, Huntington
Beach, California . In all respects meetings
of said Redevelopment Agency shall comply
with the Ralph M. Brown Act (California
Government Code §§54950 , et seq. ) . Except as
otherwise provided by the Community
Redevelopment Law (California Health and
Safety Code §§33000, et seq . ) , the rules of
procedure for the City Council as set forth
in the Charter of said City shall also apply
to the City Council acting as the
Redevelopment Agency insofar as such rules
can be made applicable.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
-1-
Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day
1
of August , 1989 .
Chairman
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
1.
�,Lp
Agency Clerk Agent Attorney -�_����
Ig-��*
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: INITIATED AND APPROVED:
Chief Executive Officer Assistant City Administrator
-2-
180
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH )
I , CONNIE BROCKWAY, Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the
foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Huntington Beach at a meeting of said Redevelopment
Agency held on the 7th day of August 1989 , and that it was so
adopted by the following vote:
AYES : Members :
MacAllister, Green, Winchell, Bannister, Mays, Silva, Erskine
NOES : Members :
None
ABSENT: Members :
None
CONNIE BROCKWAY
Clerk of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach, CA
-3- 180
RESOLUTION NO . 1.47
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH FIXING THE TIME OF REG-
ULAR AGENCY MEETINGS
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
resolves as follows :
Section 1 of Resolution No . 1 entitled , "A Resolution of
the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach Fixing
the Time and Place of Regular Meetings , Appointing Officers and
Providing for. Use of Services and Facilities of City
Departments , " is hereby amended t.o read as follows :
SECTION 1 . Regular meetings of the Redevelopment Agency
shall be held every first , third , and fourth Mondays of each
month at the hour of 7 : 00 p . m . in, the Council Chambers in City
Hall , 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach , California . in all
respects meetings of said Redevelopment Agency shall comply
with the Ralph M . Brown Act ( California Government Code
Sections 54950 , et sec . ) . Except as otherwise provided by the
Community Redevelopment Law (California Health and Safetv Code
Sections 33000 , et seq . ) , the rules of procedure for the City
Council as set forth in the Charter of said City shall also
apply to the City Council acting as the Redevelopment Agency
insofar as such rules can be made applicable .
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on
the 19th day of October , 1987
rman —
ATTEST : APPR D AS TO FORM :
Clerk ' vity Attorney
REVI-EWED AND APPROVED : INITIATED AND APPROVED
' 1 •J
City Administra or. WeXiAfCity Administrator./
f^, Co unity Development
. RE No. 147
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH)
I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Huntington Beach, California , DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing
resolution was duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach at a meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the
I9Lh day of October 19 87, and that it was so adopted
by the following vote:
AYES : Members :
Winchell , Mays, Finley, Kelly, Erskine, Green, Bannister
NOES: Members :
None
ABSENT: Members :
None
Clerk of the Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Huntington Beach , Ca .
REQUE; i' FOR CITY COUNCkL-- ACTION
Date
August 17, 1988
Submitted to: Mayor and City Council APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator
9- .
A
Prepared by: Louis Sandoval, Director of Public Works - �'
CITY C
Subject: Demolition of various structures within the various areas of redevelopment
in the City of Huntington Beach.
Consistent with Council Policy? [X] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Bids for the demolition of various structures within the various areas of redevelopment
activities, have been received by the Purchasing Division in response to a Request for
Quotations No. 421-0725.
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the quotations submitted and authorize the issuance of an annual purchase order to
Pomona Valley Equipment Rentals, Incorporated on a time and material basis, backed up by
individual purchase orders for each separate structure or parcel.
ANALYSIS:
With the escalation of redevelopment area property purchases, it is considered advisable
to retain a contractor to expedite demolitions of the various structures as they may be
vacated; and individual bidding for each varied structure would effect delays and consume
an inordinate amount of time, as well as increase liability for a vacant structure.
Therefore, on July 8, 1988, Purchasing mailed requests for quotations, along with a
general description of the type work to be performed. Two bidders responded and
submitted quotations, Pomona Valley and Greenleaf Grading. In comparing like items
quoted, the Pomona Valley quotation is the lower of the submittals. It is noted that
Pomona Valley is the firm that formerly demolished the Old Lake Fire Station in an
expeditious manner, and has demolished several other redevelopment area structures
pursuant to annual and individual purchase orders authorized by the City Council on
August 18, 1986.
No demolitions will be ordered without completion and receipt of an "Authorization for
Structure of Facility Demoliton" form.
Should any structures be suspected of containing asbestos or other hazardous materials, a
separate purchase order will be arranged for with a licensed environmental assessment
firm.
ATTACHMENTS:
Copy of Request for Quotation with description of work.
Copy of Submittal by Pomona Valley Equipment Rentals, Inc. \
Copy of Authorization Form.
I
PIO 4184
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AC jN - PAGE 2
FUNDING SOURCE:
Funding will be from Redevelopment Funds.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Do not authorize the Purchase Order issuance, and request individual structure bidding.
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 421-0725
QUOTATION NUMSCR
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Stow this wamber on OUTSIDE
POST OFFICE BOX 190 of your envelope.
HUNTINGTON BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92648 Please quote on this form.
"WrIWITONMACII FREQUEST FOR QUOTATION
e Pomona Valley Equipment Rentals, Inc. Date Mailed July 8, 1988
17301 Beach Blvd. #8 Bids will bereaeived until
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 July 25, 1986
4:00 P.M.
at the office of the Purchasing Agent
Ren Corhett
Buyer
QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION t"•.T_ !o„E AMOUN
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK
FOR
DEMOLITION OF VARIOUS STRUCTURES
IN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
The City of Huntington Beach is requesting quotations for
the demolition of various structures within several areas
of planned redevelopments Within the City of Huntington
Beach, California. Bidders are invited to submit
quotations for such work on a Time and Material and
Equipment basis for demolition work, which is anticipated
to occur at intermittent times and in varying locations and
quantities.
I. COAL AREA DESCRIPTIONS:
A. Pre-designated redevelopment project areas.
1. Main - Pier
Quotations are requested for furnishing the Items described
TERMS: — in accordance with terms set forth herein. All quotations
rb days must be F.O.B. delivered. The detailed specifications or Sales Tax
Cash discount periods of less than 20 brand names or numbers given herein is descriptive and in-
days will not be considered In sward of dicates quality and style of item required. Offer to supply
bids. IOth prox is not considered equal articles substantially the same as those described herein will TOM
to 30 days. be considered provided the articles offered are equal in
yyuallty. durability. and fitness for the purpose intended. bras must be
Aeeeptsbllity of alternates will be determined solely by the
City of liuntington Beach.
Delivery Address. ADDRSSS YOUR R<PLY TOt Signa r'e
City of Huntington Beach
California PURCHASING OKPARTM<NT
Delivery to be made on or before CITY OF HUNTINGTON ■<ACH Tl[le Suzanne Cain, SecAeta,
P.O. SOX too p G
HUNTINGTON ■KACH. CALIF. 92.Na Date 7125188
TSL.- 17141 53ei221
or days from receipt of order. phone 714 546-30 28
THIS 1S NOT AN ORDER
1
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PAGE 2 OF 6 PAGE
2000 MAIN STREET
421-0725
HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648 QUOTATION NUMBER
Pomona Valley Equip Rnt
REQUEST FOR QUOTATION VENDOR NAME
JANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
2. Talbert - Beach
3. Oakview
4. Yorktown - Lake
5. Huntington Center
o. Terry Park
B. City/Redevelopment interest areas.
1. Oceanview
2. Commodore
3. Central Park
4. Southern core - Beach to Goldenwest and PCH
to Yorktown
C. Others within city limits as may be contiguous to
above in A & B or as may become interest areas in
the future.
II. COAL STRUCTURE DESCRIPTIONS:
A. The structures which will be ordered to be
demolished are anticipated to have the
following variations.
1. They may be one to two stories in height,
and may have basements.
2. They may be framed to masonry structures.
3. They may be former residential to
commercial structures.
4. Demolitions my be ordered for single
structures, multiple structures adjoining,
or for multiple structures not adjoining.
5. The structures may be "stand alone" or
they may have a "party wall" with an
adjoining structure.
�i
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PAGE 3 OF 6 PAGE
IL 7itA' 2000 MAIN STREET
421-0725
HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648 OUOTATION NUMBER
Valley Equip
REQUEST FOR QUOTATION PomonaVENDOR NAME Rnt
IANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
III. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF DEMOLITION WORK
REQUIREMENTS:
A. Timing shall be considered to be of the essence
in the performance of demolitic>ns due to the
proximity of other residence; or business
establishments.
B. ;The contractor shall be prepa--eC3 -o commence
demolition within ten days after notification
to proceed on any structure and site.
C. Demolitions shall be expedited, without any
regard for salvage, in order to minimize
inconvenience to neighboring owners and the
general public.
D. Fronts, backs, and/or sides of each lot or site
shall be fenced off during demolition for
protection of the safety) of neighbors,
pedestrians, motorists, and general public.
Fencing may be chain link along the back and
sides, and shall be eight foot high plywood
along the fronts. Should the plywood fence
cause pedestrian travel to be within the
street, a second plywood fence shall be erected
to provide a minimum width of five feet
corridor with lighted barricades at each end.
E. All fencing shall be provided by the
contractor, whether owned or rented, at his
expense, listed as a cost per lineal foot of
each type.
F. Upon completion of the demolition, all fencing
shall be removed from the site, unless
requested to remain on a negotiated rental
basis.
IV. SPECIFIC DEMOLITION REQUIRFMETrS:
A. City furnished services.
1. The City will arrange for service
discontinuances and meter removals for
electrical, gas, telephone, water, and
cable television.
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PAGE 4 OF 6 PAGE
2000 MAIN STREET
421-0725
HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92648 QUOTATION NUMBER
Pomona Valley Equip Rnt
REQUEST FOR QUOTATION VENDOR NAME
UANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
2. The City will process any application
necessary for a Coastal Permit, if
required.
B. Contractor furnished services.
1. The contractor shall obtain and pay for a
demolition permit from the Building
Department.
2. The contractor shall properly abandon any
sewer laterals to the site.
3. The contractor shall clear each site as
follows:
a. Removal of all surface asphalt or
concrete to sawcut lines at adjoining
facilities to remain in place.
b. Removal of all concrete footings,
basement walls, foundations, piers, or
underground structures.
c. Removal of all structure walls, whether
frame, masonry, or concrete.
d. Removal of all roofing, including
rafters, joists, or bracings; and
whether basement, first, or second
story or all.
e. Removal of all roofing, including
rafters, joists, bracing, beams,
purlins, or other framing; and
including any steel framed roof
structure.
f. Removal of all underground piping, and
conduits.
g. Furnish, compact, and grade soils to
leave the site in a relatively flat
condition from the back edges of
sidewalks to any alley or adjacent
property grade.
J.
PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PAGE 5 OF 6 PAGE
i'
2000 MAIN STREET
421-0725
HUNTINGTON$EACH HUNTINGTON REACH,CALIFORNIA 926" QUOTATION NUMBER
Pomona Valley Equip Rnt
REQUEST FOR QUOTATION VENDOR NAME
JANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
h. All demolition removals shall be
disposed of offsite, and the contractor
shall pay any and all dump fees.
i. Compaction including testing paid for
by the contractor shall be performed on
sites with basements, and the
compaction s":311 meet the requirements
set forth in the "Green Book".
j. The site shall be left in a
satisfactory condition to the engineer.
k. For structures that were constructed
with a "party wall", the contractor
shall only remove portions of the site
facilities which will not endanger the
adjoining or wall sharing structure; nd
for sites which have a basement, the
contractor shall brace the adjoining
structure until backfill and compaction
efforts are completed.
1. Removals of all interiors shall
include, but not be limited to,
furniture, cabinets, floor coverings,
electrical fixtures, plumbing fixtures,
and heating and air conditioning
equipment.
V. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF BIDDERS:
A. All bidders shall furnish a Bid Bond in the
amount of $10,000, guaranteeing they will
execute a contract for a duration of at least
one year.
B. Bidders shall list quotations for import soils,
fencing of various types, barricading, move-in
and move-out, wall shoring of adjacent
structures, sawcutting, and disposal fees,
together with any other cost not reconcilable to
fixed or hourly rates.
C. Bidders shall list labor costs, including all
benefits,_. for any trade or work classification
anticipated to be needed for a demolition
project; and equipment costs for any equipment
anticipated to be utilized for general
demolition work.
J� PURCHASING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH PAGE 6 OF 6 PAGE
!' 2000 MAIN STREET
421-0725
HUNTINGTON BEACH HUNTINGTON BEACH,CALIFORNIA 926M QUOTATION NUMBER
Pomona Valley
REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONVENDOR NAMEip Rnt
IUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
D. Bidders shall list, as a percentage their
quotation, overhead and profit based on any or
all the other items listed.
E. Each bidder is made cognizant that prevailing
wage rates must be quoted, and that upon
completion of the work on each site a
certificate of compliance will be required
together with certified payrolls, prior to any
payments.
F. The contractor must adhere to any work
regulations by local, State, County, or Federal
Authorities; including, but not limited to,
working hours, air and water pollution, noise,
transportation, EPA regulations, and OSHA
regulations.
G. All proposed use of public rights of way which
may block, detour, or restrict traffic flow
must be submitted to local or State Traffic
Engineering for clearance and permissions in
advance.
H. The successful contractor must furnish
certificates of liability and workmens'
compensation insurance as required by the City.
I. Each bidder shall signify on his quotation the
maximum time his bid shall be valid. The
project is anticipated to occur over a period
of one to three years; and any lesser time
listed by the successful contractor will effect
necessity for rebidding at the end of his
quoted valid period.
J. Detailed invoicing shall be furnished for each
site completed, and following approval, partial
payments shall be made on the overall contract.
Ten percent of the monies due on each site
shall be retained until 35 days after the City
has filed a Notice of Completion on the
particular site.
Pomona Valley Equipment Rentals Inc.
9800 Beau Avenue
Riverside,CA 92503
(714)546-3028
Juty 25, 1988
City ob Huntington Beach
PuAcha6.ing DepvLtment
2000 Main StAcet
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE: QUOTATION NO. 421-0725
ATTENTION: Re.oate.e CoAbett, Puneha,6ing Agent
The 6ottowing -i.5 owt quotation 6oA the above Ae6ene.ieed pAoj zct:
977 Loader on. equivatent. OpeAated and maintained. 99.00 HA.
Move-In Z HAA . @ $99.00 peA hA.
973 LoadeA oA equ.ivatent. upenated and maintained. 125.00 HA.
Move-in 2 i4m . O '$125.00 peA hA.
235 Excavatm with BAeaheA. OpeAcured and maintained. 195.00 HA.
Move-In 2 HA6 . 0 $795.00 peA hA.
235 Exeavatm with SheaA. Operated and maintained. 195.00 HA.
Move-in 2 Hu . @ $_195.00 peA hA.
750 FoAd Backhoe oA equ.ivatent. Opmated and maintained. 60.00 HA.
Move-In 2 Hu . & $60.00 peA hn.
750 FoAd Backhoe with BAeakuL. upeAated and maintained. 720.00 HA.
Move-in 2 HU. @ $120.00 peA M.
825 Bobcat oA equ.ivatent. Operated and maintained 75.00 H)t.
Move-In 1 HA. @ 15.00 peA ha.
825 Bobcat with 8,teakeA oA equ,iva.bent. Operated and mainta.ired. 95.00 HA.
Move-In 1 HA. @ $95.00 peA hA.
Champ Fo&kt i6t 10,000 ib. Aated capacity 55.00 t4h.
Move-In 2 Hu. C $55.Ou peA hA.
Low6.ide End Dump oA equ.ivatent. 53.33 HA.
His.ide End Dump oA equ.iva Bent. 64.09 HA.
Pomona Valley Equipment Rentals Inc.
9800 Beau Avenue
Quotation No. 421-0725 R iverside,CA 92503
Continued (714)546-3028
Labors (4 Hours minimum) 29. 50 Hr.
Foreman with Truck 39. 50 HA.
6' Chain Link Fencing (TemporaAy) 8 .00 Ft.
8 ' TaZt Ptywood Fence 15.u0 Ft.
UafE Through Canopy 25.00 Ft.
vt,3puaa.e Fees:
Debra,6 9.50 Ton
ConcAete 50.00 Semi. Load
Hat Sawcutt.ing A4pha,Q;i- 4" 1 .00 Ft.
Conctete 4" 7 . 55 Ft.
Minimwn $250.O0
Soil Import 7. 50 C.Y.
Compaction Teate 55.00 HA.
4 Hr. M4,n.imum
Vemotition Pelcmi t6 @ coat p.E'us
Watt Shoti-ng and/or B)taci.ng bayed on hou42y .Labors rates ptuz mazeAiat eoat6
and any eng.ineeki.ng eo.btb i6 requiAed.
15% Overhead and Pro6 t.
P)Lice,5 are bub eet to change according to new P.U.C. rates, new ptevaiX-i.ng
wage rateb, and .i.ncrea6ea in county dump co.etb .
POMONA VALLEY FQUTPMFNT Rr:NTALS, TNC.
Suz n C , Secnet-ah.y
BOND # 02b954
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST
P.O. Box 85563 - San Diego, California 92138-5563
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That we, POMONA VALLEY EQUIPMENT RENTALS, INC.
(hereinafter called the Principal) , and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST,
a corporation organized and doing business under and by virtue of the
laws of the State of California, and duly licensed for the purpose of
making, guaranteeing or becoming sole surety upon bonds or
undertakings required or authorized by thE' l,::iws of the State of
California, as Surety are held and firmly c)ound unto the
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
(hereinafter called the obligee) in the just- and full sum of
TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND N0/100----,
lawful money of the United States of America , for the payment of
which, well and truly to be made, we hereby bind ourselves and each
of our successors and assigns , jointly and severally, firmly by these
presents .
THE CONDITIONS OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT, WHEREAS, the above
bounden Principal as aforesaid, is about to hand in and submit to the
Obligee a bid or proposal dated 7/25/88 for ,
DEMOLITION OF VARIOUS STRUCTURES IN THE CITY
in accordance with the plans and specifications filed in the office of
the obligee and under notice inviting proposals therefor.
NOW THEREFORE, if the bid or proposal of said principal shall be
accepted, and the contract for such work be awarded to the principal
thereupon by the said obligee, and said principal shall enter into a
contract and bond for the completion of said work as required by law,
then this obligation to be null and void, otherwise to be and remain
in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said principal and said surety have caused these
presents to be duly signed and sealed this 22ND day
of JULY, 191988
POMONA V EY EQUIPMENT RENTALS, INC.
Suzan e 'n, SecAetahy
INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE yEsT
76-01MON C. H
Attorney in Fact
1
V .Y
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
On This 22ND day of JULY in the year 1988 , before me, the
undersigned Notary Public, in and for the State of California,
personally appeared GORDON C. HILL
personally known to me (or proven to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence) to be the person who executed the written instrument as
Attorney in Fact on behalf of the Corporation therein named and
acknowledged to me that the Corporation executed it.
Given under my hand and Notary Seal this 22ND day of JULY
A.D. 1988
My Commission expires 11/25/90IM/7 h Ll�q -r
_(.
Signatu e of Notar
(Seal )
CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NO.202
FItateli fornia On this the 22i'Z day of JuZY 19=� before me,
SS.
Orance Donna Battin
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
Suzanne Cain
Lx personally known to me
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
OFF CIgL SEAL to be the person(s)who executed the within instrument as
� I -Secretarz� or on behalf of the corporation therein
QVNOOISiTM named,and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it.
MtOwra 1**W1gti= WITNESS my hand and official seal.
own
Notary's Signature
120 122 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 9 23012 Venture Blvd. 0 P.O.Box 4625 • Woodland Hills.CA 91365-4625
}
INSURAi-4CE COMPANY OF Thir, WEST
HOME OFFICE: SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
Certified Copy of
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Insurance Company of the West, a Corporation duly authorized and existing
under the laws of the State of California and having its principal office in the City of San Diego, California, does hereby nominate,
constitute and appoint: GORDON C. HILL
its true and lawful Attorneys)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and stead, to execute,
seal,acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written obligations in the nature thereof.
This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Insurance Company of the West at a meeting duly called and held on the Sixth day of
February, 1973, which said Resolution has not been amended or rescinded and of which the following is a true, full, and complete
copy:
"RESOLVED: That the President or Secretary may from time to time appoint Attorneys-in-Fact to represent and act for and
on behalf of the Company, and either the President or Secretary, the Board of Directors or Executive Committee may at any time
remove such Attorneys-in-Fact and revoke the Power of Attorney given him or her;and be it further
"RESOLVED: That the Attorney-in-fact may be given full power to execute for and in the name of and on behalf of the Company
any and all bonds and undertakings as the business of the Company may require, and any such bonds or undertakings executed by
any such Attorney-in-Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by the President and sealed and attested by the
Secretary."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Insurance Company of the West has caused its official seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to
be signed by its duly authorized officers this 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1984
PA I, INSURANCE COMPANY F THE WEST
� r
N
a vigc", N%
�,ltrptk President
STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
On this17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER blM the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of California, in and for the County of
San Diego, duty commissioned and qualified, came ERNEST RADY , President of INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST,
to me personally known to be the individual and officer described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and he acknow-
ledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, deposeth and saith, that he is the said officer of the Corporation
aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the-Corporate Seal of the said Corporation, and that the said
Corporate Seat and his signature as such officer were duly affixed_ and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and
direction of the said Corporation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at the City of San Diego, the day and year
first above written.
V1f '��`•S'd`d5fV1AVb`PR�'411r',cSWdtiVW
OFFICIAL SEAL
NORMA PORTER
..;�.'i• f;GS:�Y PUuLi:,•CAL1f�RN1«
���:ram►^':'r Prww.vl Of1wo in Son Dices County Notary Public
% +,
My C°rturission Exp.Jan.Z.1988
�A�Jb
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SS:
1, the undersigned, Richard S. King, Secretary of the Insurance Company of the West, do hereby certify that the original POWER
OF ATTORNEY,of which the foregoing is a full,true and correct copy, is in full force and effect, and has not been revoked.
IN THE S WHERE 1 have hereu ubscribed my name as Secretary, and affixed the Corporate Seal of the Corporation,
tls �ay of Ir9�.
LpM PA)V t.
3�atpNOA.�Eo r�,
a g
`ARCM 1.���� `�' Secret
ICW CAL 37 (REV. 5/82)
Authorizations
FOR
STRUCTURE OR FACILITY DEMOLITION
ADDRESS:
A.P. NO. :
GENERAL DESCRIPTION:
REFERENCE NOMENCLATURE:
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION:
RECORD OWNER
AUTHORITY APPROVALS DATES
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
REAL PROPERTY MANAGER
LIAISON/ HISTORIC RESOURCES BOARD
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
ESCROW CLOSED :
COURT ORDER OBTAINED:
IMMEDIATE POSSESION
CONDEMNATION COMPLETED
RIGHT OF ENTRY/DEMOLITION
OTHER
APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION PERMIT
DEMOLITION PERMIT ISSUED
+� Page 4 - Council Minutes - 3/26/84
Councilman Thomas returned to the room.
INEXUIRIAL CCWITTEE F47M AND SLIDE PRESENTATICN CN DOCNCMIC DEVEIAPHERr
PROGPM
Tarn Tincher . Redevelopment Coordinator, gave a slide presentation on the
Economic Development Program. He presented a report from the Industrial
Committee. Discussion was held regarding a proposal from Business to Business
magazine pertaining to advertisement and brochures, the slide presentation and
a proposed videotape.
Following discussion, a motion was made by Bailey, seconded by MacAllister,
that Council direct staff to pursue brochures and Business to Business
magazine proposals; and to approve in concept the slide show and videotape and
direct staff to bring back a proposal for in-house production of the slide
presentation and videotape. The motion carried by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Pattinson, MacAllister, Thomas, Kelly, Finley, Bailey, Mandic
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Councilman Mandic left the room.
STAFF P�TATIC N C N DOWNTOWN REDEVELCOEW IMPLEMENTATICN STRATEGY COUNCIL DIR=CN GIVEN
Tarn Tincher, Redevelopment Coordinator, presented a staff report regarding the
downtown development.
Discussion was held regarding procedures for public input regarding plans for
the downtown areas, particularly plans related to traffic circulation.
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Finley, that Council direct staff to
hold meetings in each sub-area to include the property owners and other
affected parties of that area. Following discussion, the motion was withdrawn.
Following discussion, a motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Finley, to
authorize staff to continue their work in each of the sub areas with the
appropriate public and property owner review of the proposed plans prior to
the public hearing, perhaps as a Saturday review. The motion carried by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Pattinson, MacAllister., Thomas, Kelly, Finley, Bailey
NC ES: =-None --
ABSENT: Mandic (out of the room) :.
Councilwoman Finley stated that she would .like periodic reports on the steps
that have been taken to receive input from the property owners and persons in
the community that would be affected by redevelopment plans. The
Redevelopment Coordinator stated that this information could be incorporated
into his regular report.
I
Page 5 - Council Minutes - 3/26/84
A motion was made by Pattinson, seconded by Kelly, to resume publication of
the Sands with a redevelopment report published on a regular basis. The
motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Pattinson, MacAllister, Thomas, Kelly, Finley, Bailey
NOES: None
ABSENT: Mandic (out of the room)
Councilman Mandic returned to the room.
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO DEVELOPMEWT OF THE TAUT-BEACH INDUSTRIAL SITE -
OCrIN w FRER 3 9 84)
The Deputy Clerk presented a communication from the Redevelopment Coordinator
regarding alternative approaches to promote development of the Talbert-Beach
Industrial site, as requested by the Agency on March 5, 1984. Tom Tincher,
Redevelopment Coordinator, presented a staff report.
Mr. Tincher stated that he had contacted the Ferro Corporation, as directed by
Council, and that it was the intention of the corporation to relocate to a
larger property outside the city so they could expand their operation. He
informed Ferro that staff would work with them to locate an alternate site
within the City, and suggested the Talbert-Beach industrial site as a possible
location. Mr. Tincher stated that representatives from the Ferro Corporation
would be arriving from Cleveland on March 27, 1984 to meet with staff
regarding the matter.
Following discussion, a motion was made by MacAllister, seconded by Thomas,
that the Agency direct staff to continue to look at all new alternative
approaches to the development of the Talbert-Beach industrial site and return
with a report to the Agency at the meeting of March 19, 1984. The motion
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:. Pattinson, MacAllister, Thomas, Kelly,
NOES: Finley, Bailey, Mandic
ABSENT: None
MOBILE HOME SHELTER PARR CONCEPT
The Director of Development Services informed Council that they had been
provided with a copy of a memorandum dated March 23, 1984 regarding mobilehome
shelter park concepts.
Discussion was held regarding the various sites within the City that staff had
selected as being suitable for mobile home park relocation projects. In
addition to the sites listed the Huntington Beach Transfer Station on Gothard
Street was suggested as a site. The City Administrator pointed out that some
of the sites listed on the memo were not intended for mobilehome parks but
perhaps for prefabricated houses or rentals. In answer_ to an inquiry from
Council the City Administrator stated that staff would present the concept of
a shelter mobilehome park at the meeting of April 16, 1984. Councilman
MacAllister requested information regarding how many mobilehome units were
being considered for relocation.
I
NOTE o
PRESENTED FOR AGENCY INFORMATION AND
FUTURE AGENCY ACTION
Subsequent to this Work Session, and with
appropriate revisions, it is anticipated
that the proposed actions will be brought
back to the Agency at its next formal meeting.
i
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
DOWNTOWN IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
Enclosed are maps which reflect the general alignment of
streets addressed within the proposed circulation plan for the
Downtown Redevelopment Area. Also included, is a map which
reflects the proposed planning and development subareas for the
existing downtown area. The proposals reflected by these maps
represent many hours of study and debate on the part of City
staff members over transportation and development issues. It
is felt that the proposed circulation plan is the alternative
most responsive to the variety of issues and concerns which
have been raised by the public and in support of the develop-
ment and transportation issues being addressed by staff.
Based on this circulation pattern and the identified and anti-
cipated development opportunities, a series of actions have
been outlined on the attached sheets, by planning subarea, for
Agency consideration. The approval of these items will move
the Downtown Redevelopment Project a significant step forward .
I
\ DOWNTOWN
\
C I RCU LA Fl ON PLAN
® SUBSTPOJTI+°►L 0R NEW gLDG#S•
01L USES
i 5
I I I I \ \\ \
J \
I \ \
I I \f 1 \\
I I I
I I I \ T4"•+sh��+
I I I
I
I I I I I \ \
I I I I i I
I I I I I
r
. .
�
�
SUBAR -_''
TOWN . SQUARE
1� SUBAREA
CRAMG
L%L -
M -PIER
AIN
SUBAREA
PL-ANNINC
` 1
TOWN SQUARE SUBAREA
1 . Approve the overall development concept for the subarea and direct
Redevelopment staff to initiate discussions with property owners and
development interests.
Authorize staff to initiate the appropriate public review of the proposed
circulation plan.
3. Authorize staff to incorporate into the Town Square Phase I Associates'
Disposition and Development Agreement, a requirement that they prepare an
overall master plan of development for the subarea working with adjacent
property owners.
4. Authorize staff to work with the Town Square Phase I Associates and other
Town Square property owners in an effort to incorporate appropriate
parcels into the Phase I development program.
5. Work with Mr. Niccole and assess the possibility of trading his downtown
holdings to the Agency in return for his participation in the
Talbert-Beach Industrial Project.
6. Work with Natalie Kotsch, Caltrans; Mr. Cavic and other auto dealerships
within the downtown area, to assess the feasibility of possibly trading
Caltrans out of their Beach-Yorktown location, into the Gothard
Industrial Area. This would allow their existing site to be used for
relocation purposes and their storage operation shifted to the industrial
area, where it more appropriately belongs.
7. Authorize staff to assess the need and the feasibility of the Agency
acquiring the vacant Southern California Edison building as a relocation
resource and possible future Community Services Center.
MAIN-PIER SUBAREA
1 . Approve the overall development concept for the subarea and direct
Redevelopment staff to prepare a "Request for Qualifications" to formally
solicit and assess development interest in the area. Said RFQ's will be
evaluated on the basis of a) the ability of the developer to respond to
existing property owner interest b) previous development experience c)
financial capacity and d) hotel interest.
2. Authorize staff to continue to explore ideas for the development of the
Public Interest Center and assess alternative means to financing the con-
struction and ongoing operation of such a facility.
DOWNTOWN CORE SUBAREA
1 . Authorize staff to continue to work with existing property owners to
assess development interest and opportunities.
2. Authorize staff to meet with Petrofina to discuss their schedule for oil
consolidation activities in the subarea.
3. Approve overall development concept and authorize staff to initiate the
appropriate public review of the proposed circulation.
r i
4 . Authorize staff to develop a more detailed concept of the proposed Trans-
portation Center and assess the feasibility of financing and developing
such a facility.
5. Authorize staff to work with the Community Clinic to assess future needs
and relocation alternatives.
HUNTINGTON-LAKE SUBAREA
1 . Authorize staff to continue to work with the Huntington Beach Company to
assess development interest and opportunities for the subarea.
2. Authorize staff to work with the Huntington beach Company and Petrofina
to assess the feasibility of incorporating a site within the subarea for
the consolidation of oil drilling operations.
3. Authorize staff to work with the Huntington Beach Company and the Hun-
tington Shores Mobile Home Park residents to develop a mobile home
shelter park in the City to accommodate the residents' replacement
housing needs.
BEACH-CITY SUBAREA
1 . Recognizing the fact that only very limited new development is likely to
occur in this subarea, unless an acceptable alternative mobile home park
is provided, and/or other appropriate housing accommodations are agreed
upon by the existing residents, authorize staff to evaluate the
feasibility of responding to this need as part of the Agency' s required
Replacement Housing Plan.
2. Authorize staff to work with The Robert Mayer Corporation and the
existing mobile home residents to assess development and relocation
possibilities for the subarea.
ATLANTA-BEACH SUBAREA
1 . Authorize staff to work with the shopping center owners to establish an
acceptable realignment for the frontage road and an overall upgrading of
the center.
2. Authorize staff to assess the need for, and feasibility of, the Agency
participating in the upgrading of flood control channels adjacent to this
subarea in response to the County' s request which occurred during the
fiscal review proceedings.
OVERALL ADMINISTRATION
1 . Authorize staff to commence immediately to prepare a Replacement Housing
Plan which will respond to the needs of residents which could be
displaced as a result of redevelopment activities. Such a plan should be
responsive to the phasing of new development which is anticipated, as
well as, the Agency' s relocation obligations.
2. Authorize staff to commence immediately with the consolidation of all the
existing redevelopment areas into one overall redevelopment project.
Such an effort will reduce administrative costs and improve the Agency' s
ability to meet its replacement housing, relocation assistance and
affordable housing obligations.
3. Authorize staff to continue discussions with the City School District in
an effort to assess the need for, and determine the feasibility of, the
Agency assisting the School District in obtaining needed industrial
storage space in response to their request for assistance during the
fiscal review process.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
COUNCIL ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To 46n6.rable Mayor and From Charles W. Thompson,
City Council Members City Administrator
Subject ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Date March 26, 1984
PROMOTIONAL PROGRAM
As part of the adopted 1983-84 Community & Neighborhood Enhancement Work
Program and -Budget, staff was directed to work with the Industrial Committee
to develop an aggressive promotional program and publish an industrial
development brochure and related marketing materials. In addition, the Work
Program called for the development of appropriate materials for the Beach
Boulevard Commercial Corridor. During the past several months, staff has been
working with the Industrial Committee, representatives from the Chamber of
Commerce, and Board of Realtors in carrying out these tasks.
The following pages reflect the components of the proposed promotional program
and the associated costs. As shown, it is expected that a significant portion
of the overall cost will be covered through advertising in the Businss to
Business Magazine insert and from donations from the local development com-
munity. The materials generated from this effort will be used to attract, as
well as reinforce, user and investor interest in the City, and in particular,
the target areas. The slide show has been viewed and critiqued by .the Indus-
trial Committee, Board of Realtors, and representatives of the --Chamber of
Commerce. With the recommended adjustments, it will provide the outline for
completion of a professional quality video tape, similar to what Long Beach
and other redevelopment agencies have done.
If you approve of the program, we will bring to you an R.G.A., as, soon as
possible, which will outline the necessary agreements and related actions.
Respectfu-1 submitted,
�l�
s W. Tho son
ity Administrator
CWT/TT:Ip.
attachments
• 'r
PROPOSED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PROMOTIONAL PROGRAM
ALTERNATIVE 1 - BUSINESS TO BUSINESS MAGAZINE INSERT FOR THE NOVEMBER
ISSUE AND ORANGE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE
FUNDING FROM ADVERTISING TOTAL ESTIMATED
PROGRAM ELEMENT DONATIONS AND SALES COST
Business to Business $ 20,000 $ 49,000
(30,000 brochures
circulated via a 32-page
insert and front cover)
10,000, 32-page brochures 6,000 --
Ultimate Video, Inc. 16,800
(8-minute video tape) 8,000
Final Slide Show 1 ,500
$ 34,000 $ 67 ,300
* City/Redevelopment Agency would be required to finance a maximum of $33,300 with
the private sector supporting at least $34,000 of the overall cost.
ALTERNATIVE 2 - CITY CONTRACTS WITH BOWER COMMUNICATIONS OR OTHER
ADVERTISING AND PRINTING FIRM TO DEVELOP AND PRINT
BROCHURE
FUNDING FROM ADVERTISING TOTAL ESTIMATED
PROGRAM ELEMENT DONATIONS AND SALES COST
10,000, 16-page $ 6,000 $ 12,345
brochures
Ultimate Video, Inc. 16,800
(8-minute video tape)
8 ,000
Final Slide Show 1 ,500
$ 14,000 $ 30,645
* City/Redevelopment Agency would be required to finance a maximum of $16,645
with the private sector supporting at least $14,000 of the overall cost.
n
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Z COUNCIL ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION
ri ,iivcro,`eras i+
70 HONORABLE MAYOR AND From CHARLES W. THOMPSON
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS City Administrator
Subject TERRY PARK SENIORS HOUSING Date March 23, 1984
PRELIMINARY APPLICATION AND
RELATED DOCUMENTS
We have prepared the attached forms which will be used in the application process for the Terry
Park sev..iors housing project. We have worked closely with the ad hoc senior citizens
committee and will be reviewing these forms at a meeting scheduled for March 29. For your
information, we have also included a copy of the City Attorney's opinion relative to age
restrictions and special consideration for Huntington Beach residents.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact Vivian Borns.
CWT/VB:dp
0482e
Attachments
TERRY PARK APARTMENTS
PRELIMINARY APPLICATION
(An individual application is required for each person)
NAME:
Last (First) Middle
ADDRESS: PHONE:
Street Area Code Number)
City State Zip
BIRTHRATE: AGE: MARITAL STATUS:
The following information is voluntary and is requested for statistical purposes only.
This information will not be used to determine the acceptability of any applicant for
tena�c _. Applicant' s race/ethnic origin Check one :
Write Hispanic American Indian Black Asian or Pacific Islander
Other
REFERENCES: Please give two names , addresses , and phone numbers of relatives or friends
who can locate you at all times:
Tame Address Phone
(Name Address Phone
HEALTH: Do you have any physical handicaps? If yes, please state:
.y
Do you require special medication or have any special medical problems? If yes, please 7;1
state `' a
PARKING: Will you require a parking. space:
INCOME INFORMATION: As a condition of occupancy, residents are required to certify their
income before moving in. Income Certification forms will be filled out when an apartment ;t
becomes available. In the meantime, please give your estimate of your annual income at . = i
this time. 'S
I ESTIMATE that my annual income from all sources is $ `
In signing this Preliminary Application, I am indicating my interest in becoming a ` "
resident of Terry Park Apartments, subject to the attached conditions and requirements.
F.
Signature Date
OCCUPANCY CRITERIA
TERRY PARK APARTMENTS -�
Every effort will be made to assure that the initial occupants of the Terry a
Park Apartments represent a cross section of the community. Therefore, it is
a goal to select a group of tenants that is a mix of ages, couples and
singles, and represents a mix of social and recreational interests. Within
this goal , the following basic eligibility criteria will apply:
- Residents must be 60 years of age or older (one member of household) ;
- Total household income cannot exceed 70 percent .of HUD' s median household
income ($23,590/year - April , 1983);
- 10 percent of total assets (such as stock bonds, investments, etc. ) will
count toward total maximum allowable income;
- Preference will be given to residents of Huntington Beach (How long have
you been a resident?) yrs. mos. ;
- Residents should be healthy and ambulatory individuals that do not require
regular ongoing in-home medical care. Several units are specially
equipped to suit the needs of physically disabled persons (Will you
require such a unit? Do you have any physical disabilities that should be
brought to the attention of the manager?)
- Are you able to climb stairs regularly?
- No pets will be allowed; -j
.q
- Residents will be asked to identify a "sponsor," a close relative or
friend, church or fraternal organization, that should be contacted in case
of illness. This person may also be asked to cosign your lease and would
be responsible for your personal possessions in the event you become
incapacitated. (If you can identify a sponsor now, please do so) :
Name `^'
Address
E
Phone
Relationship
Residents should not currently be receiving housing assistance in another
location (Are you now a participant in HUD' s Section 8 Housing Assistance
Payments Program?)
TERRY PARK APARTMENTS
PROPOSED TENANT SELECTION SCORE SYSTEM
MARCH, 1984
.s.
Income (as % of HUD Median) '
30% or less 30 pts. a
31 - 50% 20
51 - 60 10
61 - 70 5
70 - or over Ineligible
Residency
2 yrs. or less 0
over 2, less than 3 yrs. 5
over 3, less than 5 yrs. 10
over 5, less than 10 yrs. 20
10 or over 30
Bonus
Couples will receive bonus of 10 pts.
TERRY PARK APARTMENTS
INCOME ANALYSIS
HUD' s Median for All Households: $33,700
30% 50% 70%
Per Yr. Per Mo. Per . Per Mo.
L Per Yr. Per Mo. ;
•s
1 person: $7,080 $590 $11,800 $983 $16,520 $1,377
2 persons: $8,100 675 13,580 1,125 18,900 1,575
INTER-DLPARTMEN I COMMUNICATION DEC 1 4 1983i
-M1II lU Pl At it REDEVELOPM-
ENT
o PAC SPENCER From PAT HUTTON
Special Project Coordinator City Attorney
_a
' Subject MINIMUM AGE AND RESIDKNCY Date December 1, 1983
REQUIREMENTS FOR TERRY PARK
SENIOR HOUSING ' }
i
Question #l : May the City impose minimum age restrictions
for the occupants of this housing project? s
Answer # 1 : Yes .
Question 42 : May the City give special consideration to
HunLinaton beach residents in the selection of 1
tenants ?
A.
Answer- 02 : Ye.s .
't ht, i t-.y of f1riW i :rgWn Beach may impose minimum age
resfriut inns L"r t ho Acupants of the housing project . The
yerfor".al welfare cal. he prioplo is onto of the legitimate
objectives of the CiL ' s police power . In re Drexel 147 Cal .
763 , 82 P. 429 . Providing housing for the elderly both ¢*
promotes the eneral. ' w"Itare of the City and furthers one of
the ot,jectives of the public housing laws in California , _, ..
which is to increase the supply of housing available to the
elderly . ( Health and :safety Code §S0003 ( e ) . )
A minimum age requirement would provide an objective cut-off ;•'._'_ ,
point, to ensure that: the senior housing project would serve
the more eider ly c i t i zo n; of our cormnun i ty . Although the 1P;':
gonrvraI welfare whrise prmmnt .ion is authorized under the
police pnwer usual l y iid (!r!; Lo tho we l l being of the entire
rommuniLy , legislation may hr aimed at a special class in . �
order to improve Lho general welfare , as long as such All
legislation does .rot violate equal protection under the 14th '
AmendmQnt of the U . h . Constitution . 13 Coal . Our . 3d ,
C-onst i t ut.ional Law, 5 1 3l , p . 246 . A classification based on
age i ; valid i. f the clag; i V icat inn serves a rational purpose
t17.
of the City ' s policy power. . it is rational for the City to � '
�
^
- . . .
. �
Memo Lo Pat Spencer
()ocrmher 1 , 1983 -
/
Page TWO
�|
consider primarily i (e most (�}derly residents because these
people are most- likely in neod of affordable housing . This �
Una1 is hest accnmy \ �s}�od hy ^a minimum age requirement . ` ' The
�
\ `
City may adopt sLeps reanonab \y calculated to improve hou'sing �
condjtions for Lhe clUerly , and it is within the police power �
to protect particular cia��-,es of the public in need of �
protection . Sidebotham In re 12 Cal . 2d 434 , US P. 2d 453,
'"he City may give preference �o Huntington Beach reside-its in
` seleotiny tenants [or Lhe Terry Senior Housing development .
Not. all difterentiati(--)n by municipal regulation as to
non-residents is cons1-- ituLinno [ly prohibited . McClain v. '
South Pasadena ( 19�7 ) 155 CA 2d 423, 31.8 P. 2d 199. It is '
pcooi ��� ihlu for Lhe Ci �y to yive -yreforence�' to its own
residonL7, because Lhe clnssificatinn between residents and `
'1o11-residents -�ccvon a valid purpose of local ' ^
�
government , which in h` took after the health , safety and
morals n[ its own In Lhc, McClain case , the City of
Sno |�h Pnnadena hnd a mon i.' i pn 1 nwi mminq facility which was
cosirici'�d to u�;.` hy n[ Lhe City . The court held
/ kn( Lhiy cegui�V. inn was ceaq*nahle to p revenL unnate.
c1 01 n'/ , Gi vi :.| [ i rc;i yre ["renc o H Lin t ingLon 8each
roni '\',:i for �h`, �cxiu.' >|no!-, ing 4cvelnpment would help
nllcviaLe L h e lncL ')I a1: ['`rdah]c , ade«upte housing for the
,iJ,r | y of: 13^)dh . Ihoo ' such a preference is
wittlin the police power o[ Lhe City because it promotes " the
honlUh, morals , com[^rL , convenience , and general welfare of
the residents of Lhc CiLy . , , [and ] a fundamental function
and prime duty of a municipality is to preserve the health of.
iLs reaidents. " Kcllar v City f Los Angeles ( 1919 ) 179
Cal . 005 , 609, 178 P. 505 , 506.
It in inadvisable , hovonar , to condition occupancy in the
Son \or housing project nn a specific period of residency in
HvnLington Heach , The UniLed States Supreme Court has held '
that a state may not condi tinn the conferral off welfare
bon(� [ iLs on a nno ycar lnngLh of: residency . Shapiro n
'O)o I n ps n n ( l9h9 ) 394 U . S . 6\ 8, 89 S . Ct . l322, 22 L. Ed . 2d
h00, hecouae im|v`sin,| a \,nyih of residency requirement has '
been int.erpceLed h` violoi, Lhe fondomental right to tranel , `.
nll elderly resid``:Ls of-- Huntington Beach, despite their
lcnyth of residence horu , should be given equal �
consideration .
`
�
� '
Memorandum to Pat Spencer
December 1, 1983
Page Three
In conclusion , the city may enforce a minimum age restriction
for the occupants of the housing project and give special
consideration to lluntinciton Leach residents without violating
the Constitution or laws of the state or the United States .
,,J"'L�
GAT f_; HUT`1'ON
City Attorney
is
4
i y
A.
a
ri
'a.
V
REQUEST I _)R REDEVELOPMEN _ AGENCY ACTION
RH 88-15
April 18, 1988
Date
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL,
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Submitted by: Paul E. Cook, City Administrator ^_11
Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administra ' ci Y cL�x
Subject: TRANSFER OF CDBG PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUNDS
Consistent with Council Policy? K Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
At the Redevelopment Agency meeting of October 19, 1987, an Owner Participation
Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and the developer of a project within
the Main-Pier Project Area obligates the City into funding certain offsite public street
improvements in conjunction with that developments proposed multi-family residential
project. Staff has identified CDBG funds that could be utilized for those public
improvements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize staff to transfer $208,000 of CDBG funds currently programmed within the
Oakview Redevelopment Project Area to the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area for
construction of public improvements.
ANALYSIS:
On October 19, 1987, the Redevelopment Agency entered into an Owners Participation
Agreement with Newcomb Development Company, developer of a 159-unit condominium
project within the Town Square subarea located at the intersection of Lake Street and
Atlanta Avenue. This agreement commits the City/Agency into funding certain offsite
street (public) improvements, estimated to cost between $200,000-$240,000.
Staff has identified existing CDBG funds currently programmed for public improvements
within the Oakview Redevelopment Project Area that are unencumbered.
In early 1985, the United States Department of Housing & Urban Development notified
the city that the balance existing in the city's previously allocated federal "Job Bill"
monies needed to be expended by April of 1985 or returned to HUD. This unexpended
balance ($208,000) was a result of the blufftop park project in which the city's original
allocation of $567,000 was to be spent.
Upon completion of the blufftop park project, a fund balance of $208,000 existed and
because of the time constraints imposed by HUD, an alternative project could not be
designed and implemented within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area.
PI O/1/85
Staff at that time identified and prioritized five (5) alternative public improvement
projects for which these remaining "Job Bill" funds could be re-programmed and qualify
within the federal deadlines. One of these public improvement projects identified was
the "then under construction" Koledo Lane Demonstration Project that was utilizing
CDBG funds for alley reconstruction.
At the City Council meeting of March 4, 1985, Council approved the transfer of the
remaining "Job Bill" funds of $208,000 to supplement Phase I of the Koledo Lane
Demonstration Project; thereby, qualifying and meeting the federal deadlines. This
transfer was a means to retain public improvement funds and also envisioned that at such
time as an identified public improvement project was implemented within the Main-Pier
Redevelopment Project Area, a like amount of $208,000 of CDBG funds could be
transferred back from Oakview Redevelopment Project Area.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1. Do not approve transfer and direct staff to identify alternative funds.
FUNDING SOURCE:
CDBG funds
ATTACHMENTS:
1. RCA dated March 4, 1985.
PEC/DLB/CPS:lp
3649h
REQU T FOR CITY COUNT-IL ACTIOqH� 85$7
Date February 25, 1985
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members 4 C�v�CiL
� 11111110 D BY CZT � S
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator E _ i' `•
J
Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy Director of Redevelopme t &
c
Subject: ALTERNATIVE JOBS BILL FUNDS PROJECTS GiTY
Consistent with Council Policy? [ X) Yes ( ] New Policy or Except y Z C
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Fundinq Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
' I
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
At the City Council meeting of February 19, 1985, staff was directed to identify
additional, alternative projects that would qualify under Federal guidelines as being
eligible to use the city's remaining "Jobs Bill" allocation funds. Staff has researched
and identified five (5) additional projects that would qualify. These additional
projects have been prioritized and are being submitted for your consideration.
RECOMMENDATION:
The remaining Jobs Bill funds of $208,000 be used to supplement Phase I of the
Koledo Lane Demonstration Project, (alternative Project No. 1)
ANALYSIS:
The "Jobs Bt11" funds are governed by provisions of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended. The laws and regulations applicable to CDBG
entitlement programs, including regulatory provisions governing eligible activities,
apply to these funds.
Each activity assisted by "Jobs Bill" funds must be eligible under CDBG rules and
must meet all of the three broad national objectives of the CDBG program; benefit to
low and moderate income persons; aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or
blight; or meet other community development needs having a particular urgency. In
general, an activity does not meet the objective of benefiting the low and moderate
income persons on the basis that a majority of persons hired to carry out the activity
are of a low and moderate income level.
An activity serving a middle or upper income area, such as an improvement of a
public facility (beach service road), would not qualify as low and moderate income
benefit even though a majority of persons employed on such a project might be of low
and moderate income.
PIO 4/a4
RH857
February 25, 1985
Page Two
When "Jobs Bill" funds are proposed to provide assistance to a "for-profit" business
(where necessary or appropriate to carry out an economic development project - as
within the downtown redevelopment project area), qualifying such an activity to
benefit loyv and moderate income persons is usually based on whether a majority of
the permat?ent jobs created or retained will be available to low and moderate income
persons. '
Based on the applicable rules governing CDBG funds in general and those which are
outlined above, staff has identified and prioritized the following projects for your
consideration:
1. Koledo Lane Demonstration Project. Located within the
Oakview Redevelopment Project Area, predominately occupied by those
of low and moderate income level.
As the first phase of the Koledo Lane Project is underway, (contract
awarded etc.), with construction costs anticipated to be $575,000, the
remaining $208,000 Jobs Bill funds could be used to offset these project
costs, allowing a similar amount of previously budgeted CDBG funds to
be used within the second phase of Oakview's activities next program
year; or utilized for other qualifying projects. - Plans and
specifications completed.
2. McCallen Park Site Youth Recreation Building. This site is
located within an area predominately occupied by those of low and
moderate income levels in which the anticipated users will be from that
neighborhood, the remaining Jobs Bill funds could be used to offset
construction costs. - Plans and specifications could be prepared
within three (3) months.
3. 5th and 6th Street Connection. This would qualify as an
economic benefit to the downtown redevelopment project area. -
Plans and specifications could be prepared within three (3) months.
4. Liberty Park Neighborhood Improvements (curbs tters
sidewalks, street lights, etc.) This would qualify as meeting objectives
in providing an area occupied by low and moderate income levels. -
Plans and specifications could be prepared within three (3) months.
5. P.C.H. Median Modification. This would consist of a new signal
to be installed at PCH and 6th Street with the existing raised median
being modified to accommodate left turns onto 6th Street. This would
meet the objective of qualifying as an economic benefit since it's
located within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. - Plans
and specifications completed.
RH 85-7
February 25, 1985
Page Three
We have been notified by HUD that in order to retain our remaining Jobs Bill
funds, an approved project needs to be identified, 50% of remaining funds be
expended by April, 1985 and the total project completed and funds expended by
July, 1985.
Due to these time constraints, staff is recommending that you approve
alternative Project No. 1, Koledo Lane Demonstration Project.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
Approve one of the other four (4) alternative projects or reject the five (5)
recommended alternatives and provide staff with further direction.
FUNDING SOURCE:
Jobs Bill Funds
CWT/DLB/CPS:lp
0718h
,3
Page 6 - Council Minutes - 3/4/85 ,, ;
JOBS BILL FUNDS - ROLEDO LANE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT (ALTERNATIVE PROJECT 01)
- APPROVED
The City Clerk presented a communication from the Deputy Director of
Redevelopment submitting five additional alternative projects that would
qualify under federal guidelines as being eligible to use the city's remaining
"Jobs Bill" allocation funds. Prepared pursuant to Council direction on
February 19, 1985.
The Deputy Director of Redevelopment presented a staff report.
Discussion was held regarding reversal of one-way traffic on Main Street.
A motion was made by Bailey, seconded by Thomas, to direct that the remaining
Jobs Bills funds of $208,000 be used to supplement Phase I of the Koledo Lane
Demonstration Project (Alternative Project #1) . Following discussion, the
motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bailey, Finley, Green, Thomas
NOES: Kelly, Mandic
ABSENT: MacAllister
Councilman Thomas left the room.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR REVISION OF OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION ELEMENT -
APPROVED - FINLEY APPOINTED - BAILEY Y ALTERNATES
The City Clerk presented a communication from the Development Services
Department recommending the formation of an Advisory Committee for Revision of
Open Space & Conservation Element.
A motion was made by Finley, seconded by Green, to constitute a committee to
advise staff on the Open Space and Conservation Element update and appoint one
councilmember to serve; further direct the Community Services Commission and
the Environmental Board to appoint two members each, and the Planning
Commission to appoint one member. The motion carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Kelly, Mandic, Bailey, Finley, Green
NOES: None
ABSENT: MacAllister, (Thomas out of the room)
Councilwoman Finley volunteered to serve on the Open Space and Conservation
Committee. Mayor Bailey and Councilman Kelly agreed to serve as alternates.
Councilman Thomas returned to the room.
REPORT - TRANSFORMER AT LIBRARY HIT BY LIGHTING
The City Administrator reported that the transformer at Central Library had
been hit by -lightning and the library was operating with auxiliary power.
�. r
}
Paul F. Picard
1735 Main S t.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
1,
March 23, 1987
Orange County Grand Jury
700 Civic Center Drive West
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Dear Grand Jury:
This letter is about Redevelopment Projects within the City of Huntington
Beach and their relationship to the Community Redevelopment Laws of the State
of California.
I write this letter in the spirit of the law with no malice whatsoever to the
fine people at City Hall . I just have a major difference of opinion with 'the
City and cannot afford to file a law suit. All citizens have a legal right to
question the actions of their City regarding Redevelopment Projects.
I write this letter on behalf of all concerned citizens and taxpayers that
reside in the City of Huntington Beach.
Very truly yours,
Paul F. Picard
Attachments
cc: Clerk of Cit,, of Huntington Beach
Date: March 23, 1987
To: Orange County Grand Jury:
Statement: I feel the City of Huntington Beach is in violation of the
Community Redevelopment Laws and City Ordinance 1285.
The Community Redevelopment Laws of the State of California, in
conjunction with Federal Urban Renewal Statutes are laws to assist communities
in the elimination of blighted areas that exist within their boundaries. I am
not against this type of legislation as it serves a very useful purpose in our
society. However, the way the City of Huntington Beach is distorting these
laws will eventually destroy the quality of life as it now exists for all
residents of the community. These projects go well beyond the original intent
of Redevelopment.
The City of Huntington Beach has a very sound economic base, and is
presently sitting on a 70 million dollar investment portfolio from excess
revenues. The City has very few signs of physical blight, and no social
maladjustments. It is just a very nice place to live. So why does the
Redevelopment Agency continue to declare large sections of their great city to
be suffering from physical , social and economic burdens which cannot be
eliminated or reversed by private enterprise acting alone? This is a valid
question to ask the Grand Jury. Why does the city continue to attest to the
State of California Legislature that large sections of the city suffer from a
lack of proper utilization to such an extent that it constitutes a serious
physical , social or economic burden on the. co►rimunity? This is a valid
question to ask the Grand Jury. Members of the Grand Jury,, the residents of
the City of Huntington Beach are stil-1 groping for the answers to these
questions.
It is my honest opinion, after careful evaluation of the law, that the
city is using the Redevelopment Laws of the State of California for the
purposes of planning and they want to float bonds and use other sources of
taxpayer money to promote their idea of a master planned community. I do not
question the city's right to master plan a community; however, I do question
their right to use redevelopment laws to promote this plan. They wart large
sections of the city to come under their absolute control for the next
thirty-five years. They want to maximize and intensify the potential land use
for future revenues to the city and will use these public assistance funds
towards those purposes. They do this regardless of the present conditions of
blight that exist on these large sections of land and regardless of what the
residents feel about these projects.
The California Supreme Court in Redevelopment vs Hayes 1954 warned the
Courts and the Cities , including Huntington. Beach, that they should be chary
of the use of Community Redevelopment Laws unless there is a situation where
the blight is such that it constitutes a real hindrance to the development of
a city and cannot be eliminated without public assistance. The Law, said the
Supreme Court, can never be used to make a better use of planning of an area.
This is still a valid decision and was last Referenced in a 1985 Lawsuit
between the Oakland Raiders and The City of Oakland. I read this decision
-1-
into the record during my public testimony on October 14, 1986 along with
sections of Sweetwater Valley vs National City during a. Planning Commission
Study session regarding Proposed Beach Boulevard Project (see attachment) .
I also read the following from City Ordinance 1285:
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE HUNTiNGTON
BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 50 AND ARTICLES AND SECTIONS
THERETO, DECLARING A NEED FOR A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO FUNCTION IN THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, AND DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY TO
BE THE AGENCY."
"WHEREAS, there exists within the City of Huntington Beach blighted areas
as defined in Chapter 1 , Article 3 of Part I , Division 24, of the California
Health and Safety Code, which Part I of said Division 2.4 of said Code is known
as the Community Redevelopment;"
My last conversation was with the City Attorney's office approximately
two weeks ago when I expressed my concerns about the legality of these
projects. A Representative of the City Attorney' s office and myself agreed on
the following items:
The Redevelopment. Agency has a right to exist by Ordinance. They do not
have the right to act unless there are conditions of blight under Article
3. That the presumptive clause could allow structures like the Statue of
Liberty or the Eiffel Tower to be located in these project areas and as
far as the legislature is concerned they would presume they were
blighted.
I would now like to address the vain pier Redevelopment Project:. You
will see by the attached Map that the Project- was amended (Amendment #1) to
expand the Project area by a factor of 20. This expanded area includes 3 to 4
miles of beachfront adjacent to the sand south of Pacific Coast Highway. It
also includes a mobile home park, a small 9-hole golf course (Sweetwater
Valley vs National City) , two nice motels, and large sections of vacant land.
Some of this vacant land is encumbered by oil wells and small tank farms.
They have been there forever and constitute no eminent threat to the residents
of the community. With Amendment #1, the entire project area is now made up
of predominately non-blighted parcels of lard, either physical , social or
economic. This I feel is against the Community Redevelopment Laws.
For an explanation of what the court says about an amended Plan, I quote
the following:
"In Prudential Bldg. & Loan Asso. v Urban Renewal & Community Development
Agency (1971,Ky) 464 SW2d 629, wherein some of the added territory within
an urban renewal plan plainly was not itself blighted, the court held
that under such circumstances , a presumption existed that the added
territory was not blighted and was not necessary to the accomplishment of
the overall renewal plan. Prima facie, the territory could not validly
be included in the project, explained the court, and it was not enough
for the city legislative body simply to make the generalized finding that
the area, as amended, was blighted. Held the court, a specific finding
was required that the added territory was itself blighted or that it was
-L-
necessary to the accomplishment of the project, by reason of "stated
facts" such as would appear reasonably to warrant such a finding. While
recognizing that an amendment of an urban renewal plan may occur at a
subsequent time if consistent with the purpose of the renewal
legislation, the court said nevertheless that the procedural processes by
which the amendment is to be accomplished must meet certain standards
which perhaps may not be required in the original establishment of a
project. " (Refer to page 1114 Urban Renewal Statutes Blighted Area
(Prudential vs Agency KY) .
I feel the area was expanded for purposes of planning regardless of
conditions of blight. A major portion of this expanded area, especially open
areas used for recreation purposes adjacent to the sand, should have been
protected from urbanization under various sections of the California
Constitution as being in the public interest. Yet the City of Huntington
Beach's first project is adjacent to the pier and sand south of Pacific Coast
Highway on city-owned property. This Amended Plan area also includes a
shopping center more than a mile inland up Beach Boulevard and several miles
from the pier. This is a shotgun approach to Redevelopment.
I will now address the phrase, "private enterprise acting alone". At
present, no structure can be built without approval of the city. Historically
sewers, curbs, streets, gutters and public utilities have been the
responsibility of the City, County, State. and Federal Governments. These
easements are already controlled by these governmental agencies . Height
limits , zoning ordinances, etc. are already on the books as local codes and
ordinances. So in effect, nothing can ever be done by private enterprise
acting alone within the city limits of Hunt-i-ngton Beach or Newport Beach or
Costa Mesa or New York City. There is always government involvement by
established laws.
One may ask, what is so different about the overhead utilities, the
sewers, curbs, gutters and landscaping on the Proposed 5-mile Beach Boulevard
Redevelopment corridor as opposed to say Adams Avenue in the City of
Huntington Beach. At present the city is putting in center dividers,
landscaping and resurfacing the entire 4-mile stretch of Adams from Beach
Boulevard to the city limits at the Santa Ana River Channel . The cost of this
project is around 2 million dollars and is not a redevelopment project. This
same type of funding could be used to upgrade Beach Boulevard. if the city
needs a sewer in the middle of a street, is it necessary for proper
installation of that sewer for the city to place all of the private and public
parcels adjacent to the street under threat of Eminent Domain, consolidation,
non-conformity or condemnation for the next thirty-five years??
Possibly, the difference in the eyes of the Rede✓elopment Agency between
Beach Boulevard and Adams Avenue is the 400+ acres of commercially zoned
property adjacent to the boulevard itself that the city wants to control and
intensify over the next thirty-five years for Tax purposes regardless of the
present conditions of blight that exist on those parcels. Please refer to
Criteria for Boundary Selection, Beach Boulevard Report.
Ordinance 1285 (attachment) establishes the Redevelopment agency for the
City of Huntington Beach on January 16, 1967. The City of Huntington Beach
declared to the State of California:
-3-
"Whereas there exists within the City of Huntington Beach Blighted areas
as defined in Chapter 1, Article 3 of Part 1 , Division, 24, of the
California Health & Safety Cede, which Part 1 of said Division 24 of said
code is known as the Community Redevelopment."
In doing this, the City of Huntington Beach by Ordinance declared
blighted areas by definition to be contained in Article 3 of Community
Redevelopment Laws. A violation of a City Ordinance has no statute of
limitation.
The following are direct quotes from State Redevelopment Laws Section 1,
Article 3:
Article 3, Section 33030. Necessity of redevelopment:
"It is found and declared that there exist in many communities blighted
areas which constitute either physical , social , or economic liabilities,
requiring redevelopment in the interest of the health, safety, and
general welfare of the people of such communities and of the state. "
"A blighted area is one which is characterized by one or more of those
conditions set forth in Sections 33031 or 33032, causing a reduction or,
or lack of, proper utilization of the area to such an extent that it
constitutes a serious physical , s.oci.al , or economic burden on- the
community which cannot reasonably be expected to- be. reversed or
alleviated by pri vater ent.erpri se ac ti gig alone.
Article 3, Section 33031. Characteristics of blighted area ; Unfit
buildings and structures:
"A blighted area is characterized by the existence a, buildings and
structures, used or intended to be used for living, ccmmercial ,
industrial , or other purposes or any combination of such uses, which are
unfit or unsafe to occupy for such purposes and are conducive to ill
health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency,
and crime because of any one or a combination of the following factors :
(a) Defective design and character of physical construction.
(b) Faulty interior arrangement and exterior spacing.
(c) High density of population and overcrowding.
(d) Inadequate provision fer ventilation, light, sanitation,, open spaces,
and recreation facilities.
(e) Age, obsolescence, deterioration; dilapidation, mixed character, or
shifting of uses."
Article 3, Section 33032. Factors indicating economic dislocation,
deterioration, or disuse:
"A blighted area is characterized by properties which suffer from
economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse because of one or more of
the following factors which cause a reduction of, or lack of, proper
utilization of the area to such an extent that it constitutes a serious
physical , social , or economic burden on the community which cannot
reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise
acting alone:
(a) The subdividing and sale of lots of irregular form and shape and
inadequate size for proper usefulness and development.
-4-
(b) The laying out of lots in disregard of the contours and other
topography or physical characteristics of the ground and surrounding
conditions.
(c) The existence of inadequate public improvements, public facilities,
open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or
governmental action without redevelopment.
(d) A prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments, and social
and economic maladjustment."
MEMBERS OF THE GRAND JURY, IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS BY NOW THAT REDEVELOPMENT
LAW INVOLVES THE ELIMINATION OF BLIGHTED AREAS AS DEFINED IN SECTION 1 ,
ARTICLE 3.
Westminster Mall in Westminster is not a redevelopment project. Only
private capital was involved: there was no public assistance fund used. No
Declaration of Blight. The same is true with South Coast Plaza. Why should
taxpayers pay for the parking structure at Mervyrs? There is already 85
million dollars allocated for this Huntington Mall Redevelopment Project alone
and this amount could always be amended upward. The Huntington Beach
Company owns the Mall and the 48 acres of land underneath Huntington Center
Mall . The Huntington Beach Company owns all the privately held parcels of
land in the Yorktown Lake Redevelopment Project (see attachment) . The
Huntington Beach Company owns large parcels of land in the downtown section of
Huntington Beach. As you can see the Huntington Beach Company obviously has
great political influence at City Hall as to where these pork barrel projects
are located.
I respectfully ask the Grand Jury to please review the attached
annotations, "What Constitutes Blighted Area within Urban Renewal and
Redevelopment Statutes" . More specifically, Condition of the area as a whole
as being the controlling factor.
Another important factor that should be considered by the Grand Jury is
that Biennial Public Hearings are supposed to be held specifically to review
the plans for the various Redevelopment Project Areas.
Redevelopment law states the following:
"Section 33348.5. Biennial hearing for review of plan; Notice
The agency shall , biennially, conduct a public hearing for the purpose of
reviewing the redevelopment plan for each redevelopment project within
its jurisdiction and evaluating its progress, and shall hear the
testimony of all interested parties. Notice of the hearing shall be
published pursuant to Section 6063 of the Government Code and posted in
at least four permanent places within the project area for a period of
three weeks. Publication and posting shall be completed not less than 10
days prior to the date set for hearing."
"This section, does not apply to an agency of a city, county, or city and
county if such city, county, or city and county has a population not
exceeding 75,000 persons. "
-5-
According to this legal requirement, the city should have held Public
hearings to review the plans -for these Project areas as follows :
Main Pier Redevelopment Sept. 1985 - DUE Sept. 1987
York Town Lake Redevelopment Sept. 1984 & Sept. 1986
Oakview Redevelopment Sept. 1984 & Sept. 1986
Talbert Beach Redevelopment Sept. 1984 & Sept. 1986
Huntington Center Redevelopment Sept. 1986
Beach Boulevard Project In planning stage. N/A*
I do not recall these biennial notices ever published regarding any of
the Project Areas. I respectfully request the Grand Jury to ask the City for
copies of these published notices.
The average residents of all cities in Orange County are for less density
and more open space. More breathing room so to speak. The City of Huntington
Beach as it stands right now is a really nice place to live.
The Old Downtown section of Huntington Beach is probably the only
originally intact, undeveloped area adjacent to the sand in South California.
Yet the City, through the misuse of redevelopment Law is planning massive
projects that will change forever the historic and architectural soul of a
city. We cannot let this pass unnoticed without a challenge:. as to the
legality of these massive redevelopment projects..
In closing, I would like to quote. a passage from- Rodievelopm.ent Agency vs.
Hayes:
"One man's land cannot be seized by the government an.d. sold to another
man merely in orderthat the rurChaser may. hu.ild upon- it. a better house
or a house which better meets the Government' s idea of what is
appropriate and well designed" .
*Not Applicable
-6-
STATEMENT OF THE ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Council Chamber, City Hall
Huntington Beach, California
Monday, May 4, 1987
Mayor Kelly called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach to order at 7 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Winchell, Mays, Finley, Kelly, Erskine, Green, Bannister
Absent: None
REMUNERATION TO THE HUNTINGTON BEACH REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY k APPROVED k
SEPARATE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING TO BE SCHEDULED 4TH MONDAY OF MONTH
Following considerable discussion, a motion was made by Bannister, seconded by
Mays, to schedule a third meeting every month for redevelopment purposes only
and to reimburse Agency members $125 for attending the meeting, with a maximum
of four meetings per month. The motion failed by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Mays, Kelly, Bannister
NOES: Winchell, Finley, Erskine, Green
ABSENT: None
A motion was made by Erskine, seconded by Mays, to hold a third meeting every
month as the Redevelopment Agency and to reimburse the Agency members $125 for
that meeting with a maximum of two special Redevelopment Agency meetings per
month. The motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Winchell, Mays, Kelly, Erskine, Green
NOES: Finley, Bannister
ABSENT: None
Later in the meeting, a motion was made by Mays, seconded by Erskine, to hold
the separate Redevelopment Agency meeting at 7 p.m. on the fourth Monday of
each month, except for the month of June 1987. The motion carried by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Winchell, Mays, Finley, Kelly, Erskine, Green, Bannister
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
It was clarified that Agency members would not be paid the $125 when meetings
were held during regular Council meetings.
Mayor Kelly adjourned the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Huntington Beach.
ATTEST: Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk and exrofficio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
County of Orange )
City of Huntington Beach)
1, ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, the duly elected and qualified City Clerk of
the City of Huntington Beach, California, do hereby certify that the above and
foregoing is a true and correct Statement of Action of the City Council of
said City at their regular meeting held on the 4th day of May, 1987.
WITNESS my hand and seal of the said City of Huntington Beach this
the llth day of May, 1987.
Alicia M. Wentworth
City Clerk and exrofficio Clerk
of the City Council of the City
of Huntington Beach, California
Deputy
�a6 v Q 6=.
Lim CITY OF HUNTING_TON BEACH
CA 87-62
V-� COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION
HUNTINCTON BEACH S 7-8 7 �Upu
yko Tld Ild Ich
To
Honorable Mayor and From Charles W. Tho*or
4f/Cy
City Council Members City Admi ' rf`j 00q/Ti�/�MbSubjectREDEVELOPMENT Date April 29, 1987TIOI✓ OF 'IDS-
AGENCY COMPENSATION
GtliTtA MA,rnK��
Q s dc,4A MT4f
Prk Md.
In response to Councilman Bannister's request of April 21, 1987, regarding a summary of 5- Z
Redevelopment Agency Members' compensation of the five (5) largest cities in Orange (Hit Ady/
County, I would like to provide you with the following information: 84AK15k ^
ANAHEIM
ND)
The City Council acts as the Redevelopment Agency and they are given no additional
compensation when they meet as the Agency, however, Anaheim does have an Advisory
Board, meeting as a Redevelopment Commission, whose members are compensated at
$50.00 per meeting.
COSTA MESA:
The City Council acts as the Redevelopment Agency and they are compensated at
$30.00 per meeting up to four (4) meetings per month.
FULLERTON:
The City Council acts as the Redevelopment Agency and they are compensated at
$30.00 per meeting with a maximum of $60.00/month.
GARDEN GROVE:
The City Council acts as the Redevelopment Agency and they are compensated at
$30.00 per meeting, not to exceed four (4) meetings per month.
SANTA ANA:
The City Council acts as the Redevelopment Agency and they are compensated at
$125.00 per meeting, up to four (4) meetings per month. Chairman Oviayor) received
compensation for up to six (6) meetings per month.
The Huntington Beach Agency Members are compensated $30.00 for meetings other than
the City Council's regular or adjourned meetings.
If I can provide you with any additional information, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience.
PSep
3189h i-� r-
f
Y�
��1
�) o(/4L.A!-/K. k ANGEvinl
8196
1966.•PAWTu c KIT DR•
RECEIVED P1uN 1/N(�TON BF�y� chi.
CITY CLERK /98'I q�64�6
CITY OF Hli p`NT1h"uTG d f3�
C7M)
�
7m O
Q ^? E O� 14
R SP TFu��Y R cr Ed'T A A TTa CON F10141 16.
THE pAcT Tffo�~ A COPY of TN Tie exT OF WU�uTIoN
wM N6T AVA(LAc6 'T'o Ti4g GeM9QAJ- P�ta�rL.
--o2o(kc'm 7-He C,,*ry at-&Rej orr-I« 3&FbeE T744E
CITY CauNcr - MacTN6• of A4AkC# /6 =� Ig87 47
0 -
7 .-
o P. N, Fu 2TNER Mot 61 PLaWR A,-So CQN rtR m TY4T T'
�g TaxT LAjA4 NeT A-vA/L4&& 7b TN& CLRkkfr dFPCE
ITs,e4.F AND WO PROVjb6 To 7'HF CouNCIL S Y 7WE
QE- D v
E14PZMeNT 3TA-FF DtQgcTLy 8Y PAJN46- NoteMA4
CRY GL-�ek AMT✓IT Ed OF CITY CouNM �MerMBFk
phr,iedr CONSOLINT'aA .AND Pd-M16uTOIJ. T#ANkyou vfiey
rA ucq poQ ysuQ TMF AMb T*0USI-E .
YOUIP3 Tnuc.y�
.J o.
CJ
yJOLLY �
d� r
z �
S �
t
CITY OF HUN'TINGTON BEACH
kJ2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
6 April 1987
Mr. Douglas M. Langevin
8196 Pawtucket Drive
Huntington Beach, California 92646
Dear Mr . Langevin :
In response to your letter , dated April 3, 1987, this
is to inform you that neither the text nor copies of
Resolution No. 140 were available for insertion in
the March 16, 1967 council packets prepared by this
office .
A statement that the City Attorney ' s office was pre-
paring such resolution was attached to the supporting
material , copies enclosed .
Very truly yours ,
ALICIA M. WENTWORTH
City Clerk
Encs .
EL-IIZ-L- COPIES TO:
Charles Thompson, City Administor
City Council
Doug LaBelle, Deputy City Administrator
(Telephone: 714-536-5227)
Page 9 - Council Agenda
F-3c . PUBLIC HEARING - BEACH BOULEVARD PLAN ADOPTION - DRAFT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for
the proposed Beach Boulevard Redevelopment Project Area
Adoption. The City of Huntington Beach is the Lead Agency for
said redevelopment project involving properties adjoining both
sides of Beach Boulevard from Edinger Avenue on the north
southerly to Atlanta Avenue on the south, approximately 500
acres .
RA: After close of hearing, direct staff and the
Environmental Impact Report consultants to consider
public comments in the preparation of the final draft
document .
F-3d . RESOLUTION NO 140 - MODIFICATION OF RESOLUTION NO 48 - MAIN
PIER PROJECT AREAS
Communication from the Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment
transmitting Resolution No. 140 - "A RESOLUTION OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING
PROCEDURES FOR APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS WITHIN THE
MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA. "
RA: Adopt Res. No. 140
F-3e . REVIEW & APPROVAL OF REOUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS/REOUEST FOR
PROPOSALS - MASTER DEVELOPER FOR DOWNTOWN CORE AREA
Communication from the Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment
relative to the selection of a master developer for the
Downtown Core Area . Copies of RFP' s & RFQ' s available for
review in the City Clerk' s Office
RA: Staff would recommend after review, analysis , and the
incorporation of modifications desired by the Agency to
the two-phase draft Request for Qualifications/ Request
for Proposals document that the Agency take the
following actions :
1 . Approve the Request for Qualifications/Request for
Proposals for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project
Area, Downtown Core Project and authorize its
distribution;
2 . Specifically approve the selection process and
schedule as set forth in Attachment 1 .
(3/16/87) (9) -
REQUEST FOR =DEVELOPMENT AC O:NCY ACTION
RH 87-16
Late March S, 1997
Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members
Submitted by: Charles A'. Thompson, City Administrator/Chief Executive O icer
Prepared by: Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopmen
Subject: MODIFICATION OF AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 48
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes New Policy or Exception '��
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: � �
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Agency Resolution No. 48 was adopted by the Agency in September of 1982, and was
subsequently modified by .Agency minute action, changing the sixty (60,10) requirement
to two-thirds (2/3). Resolution No. 48 sets fortn the parameters under which the
.Agency's powers of eminent dornain =».ii! be ,Itilized to acquire property for
Redevelopment purposes. During the negouation and implementation stages of
projects within the fain-Pier Project Area. tree two-thirds requirement, as it has come
to be known, has had the resuita^t effect of neing a major constraining factor to Zhe
implementation of projects within the Vain-Pier Project Area. As a result, staff :gas
prepared a resolution which will supersede une provisions of the original Agenc\
Resolution No. 48 for your consideration and the Agency's subsequent minute action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve the attached Resolution No. r' .
,ANALYSIS:
Since the Spring of 1984, efforts have been underway to negotiate and implement
Disposition and Development Agreements for several projects within the 14ain-Pier
Redevelopment Project Area. In each case, the developer has been required to
prepare a plan and seek the approval of two-thirds of the landowners, by both area and
parcels, before a Disposition and Development .Agreement that requires the acquisition
of properties by eminent domain could be executed by the Redevelopment Agency.
The result of this action has been to place undue emphasis on existing ownership
patterns. In staf f's analysis, the major governing factor should be achieving the
desired land use for the site in question in concert with enhanced economics. 4 ith the
two-thirds requirement, the controlling factor, in terms of support, tends to hinge not
upon the benefits of a given redevelopment project, but rather the realization of a
perceived land value.
I
The new Agency Resolution No. will not remove any of the owner participation
requirements under the previously adopted Owner Participation and Re-Entry Rules,
nor any of the requirements for a critical cost benefit analysis on a project-by-project
basis by the Redevelopment Agency prior to a project's implementation. It will,
however, assure developers that once the mutually desired land use plan is arrived at
and tested from a cost benefit perspective, and the deal points of a Disposition and
Development Agreement mutually agreed upon, that the Agency is prepared to move
forward with all property acquisitions as appropriate to assure a project's
implementation.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1. Do not approve the attached resolution and continue redevelopment implementation
efforts, utilizing the existing provisions of Resolution No. 48 or modify Resolution No.
48 in other ways.
FUNDING SOURCE:
None as a function of the adoption of this resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 164").
Resolution No. 48.
Cu TiDLB:io
3087h
or
a -
RESOLUTION NO. 46
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING PROCEDURES FOR APPROVING DEVELOP-
MENT. PROPOSALS WITHIN THE MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREA
r
WHEREAS , the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
has prepared a proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Main-Pier Redevelopment
Project Area; and
WHEREAS , with the adoption of said Redevelopment Plan by the City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach , the Redevelopment Agency wishes
to insure meaningful owner participation in the identification , evalua-
tion , selection and implementation of specific development proposals which
may occur within the Project Area ,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington
Beach does resolve as follows :
Section 1 . The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
Will solicit the participation of existing property- owners within the
Main-Pier Project Area in the redevelopment program as required under the
previously adopted owner Participation and Re-Entry Rules .
Section 2 The L-.edevelo ment rcenc, , _n consu_`�tio
pating property owners , will identify and pursue specific development
proposals for sites within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area .
Section 3 . Upon formulating a specific development proposal for a
site within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area , the Redevelopment
Agency will submit said development proposal to the owners of property
within said site for their consideration and approval . Before the Re-
development Agency can execute a disposition and development agreement ,
or owner participation agreement , or both , to implement a development
proposal within the site which would require acquisition of property by
the use of eminent domain , the development proposal must be approved by
sixty percent ( 601 ) of the owners of property within the site, by number
of owners , anc: at least sixty percent (60% ) of the owners , by land area ,
excluding public rights- of-way within said site .
Section 4 . For the purpose of implementing Section 4 of this Reso-
lution, the Redevelopment Agency shall utilize the map which is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" for determining the land holdings. of each individual
..3 _
3d -
s
owner and the number owners which will be e: ible to vote on any -
specific development proposal. Land holdings of an individual prvra:rty a.4m--r
within a site being considered as part of a development proposal will be
aggregated to one total amount of area representing one vote for said -*-_
C property owner.
Section 5. With the adoption of this Resolution, the Chief Executive
�! Officer is authorized to develop administrative procedures to implement
the owner approval process as outlined above , and is also authorized to
amend the ownership map as ownership changes occur .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of September 19� 2 .
ATTEST:
Secretary Chairman
APPROVED AS 70 FORM: iNT?ATED AND APPROVED AS TO CON-ENT :
Legal Counsel vector, Business & ;ndustriai Enterprls�,
APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT :
STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH
t a v_
Chie Executive ff cer BY • TOM CLARK
Speical •Redevelopment Counsel
AMM
,3
19
115
Ot
114
' L12 0 _ "t t— a 4T,
14
14
1; ' --- -- - -- —-- O :
---------- ---==---, ------- `-' -- ——— 1 1. ---------
40— ---aj=---i= —1 it I n (8 16�• 26 ti .
to i 1� t 10
13 a IC I 1 0 j / 1 - - IQ
j...._ -------------------J � __-.�---------L
N 13r1
S Z
—— ( S T
.9
� 70
.... ___---_—_--->----------------------------2—_----____--_— � M
40
Vf
NAher. John 1 1'•uitt. Rnbo�t sl. 11 m
Mnrris, lon^io R. 17 x
SarraDere, Chs•lts ? _
Taylor, Margfe 3 Me,%lund, len 0. U to
TO aran Tuhach. Gwendolyn, et al (Holt) 4 WaI1a(e, G,.PndoIvn 1. 14 To mean
tide Tine Fo■■ Development Company 5 Mnlwpfefa, Thnn.A% 15 tide line •
lefdan, Adel M. 6 Nelson, Norm" 16 D
Davis, Stephen F. 1 Gardner, RI(hard 11
r
Gates, Clyde Ronald 8 Gardner, ,rnvstlne 18
M 8. Assistance league 9 O.C. Spn,iallios +1 19
Mad
Iotff. Helen 10 poste. IlArvey D. 70
0
(ity of 11unti..ylon HPA(h 40 ~
N
W
25
Lj
Q 13, 5 Worthy, Norm
!1
- `^ ` --- Westmoreland. Clyde C.
137-------1 - Energy Qvelopwent-Cerpor+tton 23
� '38—� Conley. John N
2 —3 i 11 1 ,6 1
—S i ' Shupe. Margaret E. 2S
24 ,d . �3 2 1 Omohundro. Stuart W. at al 26
• - -- �-- 1 1 '• � j �.T CraccAiolo, Frank 2)'
-----..—�� i-- ----- ---"--- J —1.--------1
r--r—_—.-----,—w---- Wood. Blanche A. et al 2s
4p '�� —�27 �128 1'40'30 �31 �i i33 i " Terry, Robert 29
1 1 ---
tl �0 �I i 12 i 1� i I 1 32 8+gst+d, Eldon W. 30
Gosney. Jack L. 31
Abdelmuti. Admad Hawed 32
---' --- — --- — Barter, Anna L. 33
Lindley. Mary B.
Terry, C. Victor 34
Mast, Ronald A. )S
Draper. Eleanor J. 3i
--. ----------------------------
--------------------i- --- ,—
/ 4 0 Wilson, Thomas f. 37
1 Main Street Saloon (Gary Mulligan) 36
1 Watkins. Homer 39
To mean To mean tide City of Huntington Brach 40
tide line line and oule-'
limits of pier
v
0
A:+
Res. No. qB
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH)
ki
I , ALICIA M. 'WENTWORTH, Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a
meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 7th day
of September , 1982 , and that it was so adopted by
the following vote:
AYES: Members:
Thomas , MacAllister, Mandic , Finley, 8ailev, Kelly
NOES: Members :
None
ABSENT : Members :
Pattinson
Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Huntington Beach, Ca.
r � F_
3d .
_
�esOIV-1-� Dr
�-t4-orheyS
d �
Page 11 - Council Minutes - March 16, 1987
The Deputy City Clerk presented Resolution No. 5763 for Council considera-
tion - "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
APPROVING LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN NO. 87-1."
Resolution No. 5763 - Adopted As Amended - Land Use Element Amendment to the
General Plan 87-1A
A motion was made by Finley, seconded by Mays, to adopt Resolution No. 5763,
as amended by deleting Area. 2.3, (17.90 acres bounded by Utica Avenue,
Seventeenth Street and Lake Street). The motion carried by the following roll
call vote:
AYES: Winchell, Mays, Finley, Kelly, Erskine, Green
NOES: Bannister
ABSENT: None
JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Mayor Kelly announced that a joint meeting of the City Council and the Rede-
velopment Agency had been called.
AGENCY ROLL CALL
Present: Winchell, Mays, Finley, Kelly, Erskine, Green, Bannister
Absent: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS RELATING TO CITY/REDEVELOPMENT ITEMS
Dave Schulze suggested that the pier be expanded into a tourist attraction and
that height and design restrictions be deleted for downtown redevelopment.
Judith Severy, representing the Huntington Beach-Fountain Valley Board of
Realtors, requested that Council/Agency defer consideration of Agency Resolu-
tion No. 140 pertaining to the power of eminent domain to give the Board an
opportunity to study the issue.
Doug Langevin stated that he was opposed to Agency Resolution No. 140.
Natalie Kotsch stated her concern that the pier area committee should have
input regarding Agency Resolution No. 140.
David Hunsaker, Jerry Higman, Bob Bolen distributed letters to Council from
Reliable Wholesale Lumber, Inc. , Hans Imports, Marlin Industries and Lengyel's
Machinery Co. , Inc. , all dated March 16, 1987, in opposition to the proposed
cul-de-sac for Redondo Circle, Roger Rhoades, Ron Pattinson and Tom Ewing
spoke in support of the Rhoades-wing proposal for the Talbert-Beach indus-
trial parcel.
Lee Wieder, Pat Friend presented Council/Agency an informal petition with
approximately 35 signatures supporting the Boureston proposal and Bob Chrisman
spoke in support of the Boureston Development proposal for the Talbert-Beach
industrial parcel.
Page 12 - Council Minutes - March 16, 1987
Stanford Tharp stated he believed there was a need for public input regarding
the concept of a Master Developer for the downtown core area.
Councilman/Director Erskine stated for the record that the letter from the
Coldwell Bankers that he referred to during the meeting of March 2, 1987 had
been shared with all seven councilmembers/directors.
MINUTES - APPROVED
The Deputy City Clerk/Deputy Clerk presented the minutes of the adjourned reg-
ular meeting of March 2, 1987, and the regular meeting of March 2, 1987 for
Agency consideration.
On motion by Erskine, second Kelly, Agency approved and adopted the minutes of
the adjourned regular meeting of March 2, 1987, and the regular meeting of
March 2, 1987, as written and on file in the Office of the Clerk, by the fol-
lowing roll call vote:
AYES: Winchell, Mays, Kelly, Erskine, Green, Bannister
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Finley
ABSENT: None
JOINT PUBLIC HEARING - BEACH BOULEVARD PLAN ADOPTION - DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT - STAFF AND EIR CONSULTANTS DIRECTED TO CONSIDER PUBLIC COMMENTS
IN PREPARATION OF FINAL DRAFT
The Mayor/Chairman announced that this was the day and hour set for a joint
public hearing by the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency on the Draft
Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Beach Boulevard Redevelopment
Project_ Area Adoption. The City of Huntington Beach is the Lead Agency for
said redevelopment project involving properties adjoining both sides of Beach
Boulevard from Edinger Avenue on the north southerly to Atlanta Avenue on the
south, approximately 500 acres.
The Deputy City Clerk/Deputy Clerk announced that all legal requirements for
notification, publication and posting had been met, and that she had received
a communication from the Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Board of Realtors
dated March 16, 1987 with a request that it be made a part of the record.
The Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment presented a staff report.
Steve Kohler, Project Manager, reviewed the schedule of the project.
Mayor/Chairman Kelly reminded Council/Agency that Dean Albright, Chairman of
the Environmental Board, distributed a communication to Council/Agency dated
March 11, 1987 transmitting their responses to TABLE A, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
SURVEY, PAGE XIV.
The Mayor/Chairman declared the hearing open.
Dean Albright, Chairman of the Environmental Board, stated their belief that
in order to proceed with the Beach Boulevard Redevelopment Project it would be
necessary to upgrade the Orange County Flood Control Channels in order to
LAO CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
VIJ COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION
HUNTINGTON BEACH
To Honorable Mayor and From Charles W. Thompson,
City Council Members City Administrator . I /,,
/(�
Subject Date '�[ ( o
MODIFICATION OF April 2, 1987 /
AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 48fNb%s-r PO Nt
r
At your meeting of March 16, 1987, it was your action to continue consideration of
Agency Resolution No. 140 to your April 6, 1987, meeting to allow for further review of
this item by interested parties. Resolution No. 140 would serve to modify previously
adopted Agency Resolution No. 48 which set forth the parameters under which the
Agency's powers of eminent domain would be utilized to acquire property for
redevelopment purposes within specific development sites.
In view of the Agency's pending effort to select a master developer for the Downtown
Core area, it is staff's recommendation at this time that this matter be tabled for a
period of approximately 120 days to allow staff to work with existing property owners and
developers as the Request for Proposal submittal process proceeds. Following the
completion of that action, this matter could be removed from the table and appropriate
action considered by the Agency at that time.
Respectfully submitted,
Charles W. Thompson,
City Administrator
CWT:lp
Attachments: Resolution No. 48
Resolution No. 140
3133h
3 �
I
RESOLUTION NO. 48
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING PROCEDURES FOR APPROVING DEVELOP-
MENT PROPOSALS WITHIN THE MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREA
WHEREAS , the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
has prepared a proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Main-Pier Redevelopment
Project Area; and
WHEREAS , with the adoption of said Redevelopment Plan by the City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach, the Redevelopment Agency wishes
to insure meaningful owner participation in the identification , evalua-
tion, selection and implementation of specific development proposals which
may occur within the Project Area,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington
Beach does resolve as follows :
Section 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
will solicit the participation of existing property owners within the
Main-Pier Project Area in the redevelopment program as required under the
Previously adopted Owner Participation and Re-Entry Rules .
Section 2 . The Redevelopment Agency, in consultation with partici-
pating property owners , will identify and pursue specific development
proposals for sites within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area .
Section 3 . Upon formulating a specific development proposal for a
site within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area, the Redevelopment
Agency will submit said development proposal to the owners of property
within said site for their consideration and approval . Before the Re-
development Agency can execute a disposition and development agreement ,
or_`owner participation agreement, or both, to implement a development
proposal within the site which would require acquisition of property by
the use of eminent domain, the development proposal must be approved by
sixty percent (60%) of the owners of property within the site, by number
of owners , and at least sixty percent (60%) of the owners , by land area,
excluding public rights- of-way within said site.
Section 4 . For the purpose of implementing Section 4 of this Reso-
lution, the Redevelopment Agency shall utilize the map which .is attached
¢ hereto as Exhibit "A" for determining the land holdings. of each individual
owner and the number owners which will be el ble to vote on any
specific development proposal. Land holdings of an individual prclerty cwner
within a site being considered as part of a development proposal will be
aggregated to one total amount of area representing one vote for said
property owner.
�• Section 5. With the adoption of this Resolution, the Chief Executive
Officer is authorized to develop administrative procedures to implement
the owner approval process as outlined above , and is also authorized to
amend the ownership map as ownership changes occur .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of September 19, 2 .
ATTEST:
Secretary Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM: INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT :
Legal Counse Director, Business & Industrial Enterprise
APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:
STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH
Chief Executive Offrcer BY: TOM CLARK
Speical Redevelopment Counsel
w
WALIIJT
1. 17 18L9 L 11`11
6 7 1 6.1 W m nJ
t LIa= ---N—---a2 11 115
-h'—
� 9
•I -4 %E- 1 1b'_ 1 i 12 _ ---=t 1�--------
------ -, .jam -------1 _ --I 1,- --- -
I 1 — -4 i --�-�' —--1 -.—+� 1 c:,�- : s --
t
13 �4' y �;-- ;--- 1 i40 i i a il9f`a 18116, 119{2Cr
f2 I 13 1� 16 I. C
tZI m
o rn
E r
--- 1------------------- --------'-------- ---1 1_--__�_J_r--�_--_�-'� m �o
3
N rT1
S Z
C
a o
40 7..--------------_—_-----_-------------------- --------------------------4 m C-)
1 �_
N
Heber, John 1 Pruitt, Robert W. 11
Sarrabere, Charles 2 Morris, Tommie R. 12 `..
To mean Taylor. Margie 3 Marchand, Leo D. 13 is tide aloe Tubach, Gwendolyn, et al (Holt) 4 Wallace, Gwendolyn I. 14 To mean -�
foxx Development Company 5 Holwerda, Thomas 15 tide line
Zeidan, Adel M. 6 Nelson, Norma 16
Davis, Stephen F. 7 Gardner, Richard 17
n
Gates, Clyde Ronald 8 Gardner, Ernestine 18
m
H.B. Assistance League 9 O.C. Specialties N2 19 ..
Madzoeff, Helen 10 Pease, Harvey D. 20 c
City of Huntington Beach 40 -%
N
J
{
21 ---- �25 ----- --------- i3———————
- I
R - 13_S_-_5--_-_ 1 Worthy, Norm 21
1 r - _. - ---- 1 136 - 1 '^ Westmoreland, Clyde C. 22
-----�/ ! l 1 ...�o- < 1---------1
22 Iq 1 1 137 =. 1 Energy 08velopment-Corporation 23
Conley. John 24
a i23 3 i 1 39 B __I 1 ' Shupe, Margaret E. 25
4 -T-------��15 1 L
24 el Yi 1 _-`--� ,j' 32 - 1 Omohundro, Stuart W. et al 26
-- ¢---a 1, - -� Cracchiolo, Frank 27
Mood, Blanche A. et al 28
40 i i i77 12$ `: 140 30 '131 1 133" , Terry, Robert 29
Ba stad, Eldon W. 30
!3 I !0 1!! ! 12 132 !t, L 2 11 9
1 - 1 Gosney, Jack L. 31
I {___-_T-_�__ -___1 Ij• ' 1 .� 1 1 I Abdelmuti, Admad Hamed 32
Baxter, Anna L. 33
Lindley, Mary B.
Terry, C. Victor 34
Mase, Ronald A. 35
-----------------------------------------------i------T— Draper, Eleanor J. 36
/ 4 0 Wilson, Thomas E. 37
Main Street Saloon (Gary Mulligan) 38
tWatkins, Homer 39
To mean To mean tide City of Huntington Beach 40 !
i
tide line line and outer
limits of pier
v ,
d
o '
A
O i
y
,N !i
f
i
Res. No. 48
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
=- COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH)
t2b J
I , ALICIA M. -WENTWORTH, Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a
meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 7th day J
of September 1982 , and that it was so adopted by
the following vote:
AYES: Members:
Thomas , MacAllister, Mandic, Finley, Bailey, Kelly
! ' NOES: Members:
I None
ABSENT: Members :
Pattinson
r
%,
Secretary of the Redeve opment Agency
of the City of Huntington Beach, Ca.
RESOLUTION NO. �qo
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING PROCEDURES FOR
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS WITHIN THE MAIN-
PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach has prepared a proposed Redevelopment Plan for
the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project area; and
With the adoption of said Redevelopment Plan by the City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach, the Redevelopment Agency
wishes to ensure meaningful owner participation in the
identification, evaluation, selection, and implementation of
specific development proposals which may occur within the Project
Areas; and
The provision of meaningful owner participation
opportunities requires that accommodations be made among the
respective interests of owners;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach does resolve as follows :
Section 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach will solicit the participation of existing
property owners within the Main-Pier Project Area in the
redevelopment program as required under the previously adopted
Owner Participation and Re-Entry Rules.
Section 2 . The Redevelopment Agency, in consideration
with participating property owners, will identify and pursue
specific development proposals for sites within the Main-Pier
Redevelopment Project Area.
1 .
Section 3 . Upon formulating a specific development
proposal for a site within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project
Area, the Redevelopment Agency will submit said development
proposal to the owners of the property within said site for their
consideration . Before the Redevelopment Agency can execute a
Disposition and Development Agreement , or Owner Participation
Agreement , or both, to implement a development proposal within the
site which would require acquisition of property by the use of
eminent domain, owners and tenants must be given an opportunity to
review the development proposal .
Section 4 . For the purpose of implementing Section 3 of
this Resolution, the Redevelopment Agency shall utilize the
current assessor 's parcel map at the time of project review by the
Agency for notifying the individual owners and the current
certificates of occupancy for determining the various tenants .
Section 5. This Resolution supersedes Resolution No. 48
of the Redevelopment Agency (which Resolution No . 48 shall
hereafter be of no further force and effect ) .
Section 6 . The Chief Executive Officer is authorized to
develop administrative procedures to implement the owner/tenant
2 .
review process as outlined above, and is also authorized to amend
the ownership map as changes in ownership occur .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,
1987 .
ATTEST:
Agency Clerk Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVE AS TO FORM:
k7 Agency Counsel Special Agency CoUP56611
��4
I • TIATED AND APPROVED: APPROVED•
D City Administrator of Execu7tfve Offitler
edevelopment
3 .
REQUEST FOF. .3EDEVELOPMENT A� HNC ON
H 87-16
Mar 5, 1987
Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Red elopment Agency Me bers
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator/Chief Executive Offi
Prepared by:
Douglas N. La Belle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopm nt
Subject: MODIFICATION OF AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 48
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exce tion
Statement of"Isue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source,Xternative Actions, Attachments:
,\
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Agency Resolution No.\48 was adopted by the Agen y in September of 1982, and was
subsequently modified by�'Agency minute action, c anging the sixty (60%) requirement
to two-thirds (2/3). Resolution No. 48 sets forth he parameters under which the
Agency's powers of eminent domain will be util' ed to acquire property for
Redevelopment purposes. Durin� he negotiation and implementation stages of
projects within the Main-Pier Proj��A rea, e two-thirds requirement, as it has come
to be known, has had the resultant effe t o being a major constraining factor to the
implementation of projects within the Ma -Pier Project Area. As a result, staff has
prepared a resolution which will superse t provisions of the original Agency
Resolution No. 48 for your consideratio and th Agency's subsequent minute action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve the attached Resolution . 0
ANALYSIS:
Since the Spring of 1984, effor s have been underway to negotiate and i lement
Disposition and Development greements for several projects within the in-Pier
Redevelopment Project Are . In each case, the developer has been required
prepare a plan and seek theapproval of two-thirds of the landowners, by both ar and
parcels, before a Disposition and Development Agreement that requires the acquisi ' n
of properties by eminent domain could be executed by the Redevelopment Agency.
The result of this action has been to place undue emphasis on existing ownership
patterns. In staff's analysis, the major governing factor should be achieving the
desired land use for the site in question in concert with enhanced economics. With the
two-thirds requirement,.!the controlling factor, in terms of support, tends to hinge not
upon the benefits of a given redevelopment project, but rather the realization of a
perceived land value.
1
G
3C,
PI O/1/85
The new Agency Resolution No. will not remove any of the owner participation
requirements under the previously adopted Owner Participation and Re-Entry Rules,,
nor any of the requirements for a critical cost benefit analysis on a project-by-project
basis by the Redevelopment Agency prior to a project's implementation. It will;
however, assure developers that once the mutually desired land use plan is arrived at
and tested from a cost benefit perspective, and the deal points of a Disposition and
Development Agreement mutually agreed upon, that the Agency is pre red to move
forward with all property acquisitions as appropriate to assure a proje is
implementation.
Staff ias reviewed this proposal with the Huntington Beach Ch ber of Commerce,
the HB`/FV Board of Realtors, and the Main-Pier Project Are ommittee. Comments
and recommendations from these various groups will be ma at the Council meeting
of April 6\, 1987.
ALTERNATIVE.ACTION:
1. Do not approve\the attached resolution and contin redevelopment implementation
efforts, utilizing the existing provisions of Resol ion No. 48 or modify Resolution No.
48 in other ways. \\
2. Approve a modification to Resolution No. 48 ich would require that project approval
by property owners representing greater tha fifty percent (50%) of the land area
excluding public right-of-,ways within the oject area.
FUNDING SOURCE: \
None as a function of the adoption o this resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 140
Resolution No. 48.
CWT/DLB:Ip
3087h
•
Ji HUNTINGTON BEACH CHAMBER of COMMERCE
• SEACLIFF VILLAGE, 2213 MAIN, # 32 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648
TELEPHONE (714) 536-8888
March 30 , 1987
1987-1988
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Resident
SIEVE HOLDEN g
South Shores Insurance Agency Mr . Jack Kelly , Mayor and.\
Vice President \Members of City Council
ARTAviles S d Associates Art Aviles '_City of Huntington Beach
Vice President 2000 Main Street
CHRIS N.CLAWSON Huntington Beach , CA 92648
McDonnell Douglas Astronautics
Vice President
KLAUS GOEDECKE Dear\.Mayor Kelly :
Automobile Club of Southern California --•\
Vice Ptesiderrl
ROGER WORK This letter is in response to Agency Resolut on No . 140 which ,
Huntington Beach Company if adopted , would supersede Agene,y Reso tion No . 48 which
Chief ra fficer
HOWARDSHUPE establishes procedures for a ppro,ving evelopment proposals
Weiser Lock within the Main Pier Redevelopment' Project Area .
Executive Vice President
JOVCE RIDDELL
JOYC RIDDr At our March 2.6 meeting , the Board oted unanimously to support
Past LARRYWASHA Resolution 140-, which would rem ve the two - thirds control
TheBroedway requirement placed on develop rs before eminent domain could
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
be used for the aq-uisition :of property .
JEROME M.BAME
Atiomey At Law r..
CORRIEBROUS.SARD We feel that the p,rovi�s ons of Resolution 48 have become
Resident-SandDoliars restrictive and are en";c ering the efforts to move forward
BRA Star Real
on the plans for dowr_t t redevelopment, thus making it extremely
EPA Star Real Estate Center
ELIZA.BE'HCOPLEY difficult for develo e..nt to proceed at a reasonable and
Attorney economical pace . \�
PAT DAVIS
Nautilus Imports
DALE LDUNN Also , we believ that Agency Resolution No . 140 will , in
HuntingtonSavings& Loan no way, circumven any of the�\legal and due process procedures
JOHNFARIS contained withi Eminent Domain Law or Redevelopment Law ,
✓ICKHArn Cali!omiaGas Company including owner participation , as well as Agency DICK HARI�W \ g y policy with
Richard Hann.3.Associates regard to this a t t e r .
PHILIP 5.iNCLEE
Uberty?:aria+aiSink Thank you f the opportunity to comment on this issue which
ART ecurit'7s is of vital imp
ortance portance in continuin the momentum in the
MIKE MARTIN Main Pier Redevelopment Project Area .
Southern C.Iif,mia Edison Company
ROXANNE NICKEL-O'MALLEY Sincerely ,
Fabric Protection Inc.
DON PANKHARD.C:-U
The Pankhard Agency �/J�y.. i.�"'�•
BROOKE PLUNKETT ,
Plunkett Insurance
Steve olden
FRANK RICHMOND
Francois' P r e s i e n t
BIU_REFICE JR.
Luati s Dell&Bakery S H:kb
SPENCER SHELDON
Omnibus Environmental Services \
FRED SPEAKER cc : Charles Thompson , City Administrator \
Terry Leasing Doug LaBelle , Director of Redevelopment
HAYDEE TILLOTSON V
Beach Front Properties
STAN TKACZYK
Rainbow Disposal Company
REQUEST FOF. ,IEDEVELOPMENT A cNCY ACTION
DN 34/&? e0d-1-u2 D -�b y/`lj 7 " 5+A*
'Q -�(m 11 Subw►,.�--� �l�/FV crf ?,,AJ446, RH 87-16
C c� C- , 1�edeualopwro<.t Co,��.�++ee �
�ow��owh4At- eor.,.�.►flee 6- "e- Date March 5, 1987
q�QS{' Qy.r(� t`Ps4oAns a b^Lk }e C0-JWC4c.
Submitted to: Honorable Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator/Chief Executive O ficer
Prepared by: Douglas N. LaBelle, Deputy City Administrator/Redevelopment
Subject: MODIFICATION OF AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 48
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes bJ New Policy or Exception '��
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments:
•
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Agency Resolution No. 48 was adopted by the Agency in September of 1982, and was
subsequently modified by Agency minute action, changing the sixty (60%) requirement
to two-thirds (2/3). Resolution No. 48 sets forth the parameters under which the
Agency's powers of eminent domain will be utilized to acquire property for
Redevelopment purposes. During the negotiation and implementation stages of
projects within the Main-Pier Project Area, the two-thirds requirement, as it has come
to be known, has had the resultant effect of being a major constraining factor to the
implementation of projects within the Main-Pier Project Area. As a result, staff has
prepared a resolution which will supersede the provisions of the original Agency
0
Resolution No. 48 for your consideration and the Agency's subsequent minute action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Approve the attached Resolution No. .
ANALYSIS:
Since the Spring of 1984, efforts have been underway to negotiate and implement
Disposition and Development Agreements for several projects within the Main-Pier
Redevelopment Project Area. In each case, the developer has been required to
prepare a plan and seek the approval of two-thirds of the landowners, by both area and
parcels, before a Disposition and Development Agreement that requires the acquisition
of properties by eminent domain could be executed by the Redevelopment Agency.
The result of this action has been to place undue emphasis on existing ownership
patterns. In staff's analysis, the major governing factor should be achieving the
desired land use for the site in question in concert with enhanced economics. With the
two-thirds requirement, the controlling factor, in terms of support, tends to hinge not
upon the benefits of a given redevelopment project, but rather the realization of a
perceived land value.
C/
I.
PI O/1/85
The new Agency Resolution No. will not remove any of the owner participation
requirements under the previously adopted Owner Participation and Re-Entry Rules,
nor any of the requirements for a critical cost benefit analysis on a project-by-project
basis by the Redevelopment Agency prior to a project's implementation. It will,
however, assure developers that once the mutually desired land use plan is arrived at
and tested from a cost benefit perspective, and the deal points of a Disposition and
Development Agreement mutually agreed upon, that the Agency is prepared to move
forward with all property acquisitions as appropriate to assure a project's
implementation.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1. Do not approve the attached resolution and continue redevelopment implementation
efforts, utilizing the existing provisions of Resolution No. 48 or modify Resolution No.
48 in other ways.
FUNDING SOURCE:
None as a function of the adoption of this resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. ILP.
Resolution No. 48.
CW T/DLB:lp
3087h
RESOLUTION NO. 48
f
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING PROCEDURES FOR APPROVING DEVELOP-
MENT PROPOSALS WITHIN THE MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREA
WHEREAS , the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
has prepared a proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Main-Pier Redevelopment
Project Area; and
WHEREAS , with the adoption of said Redevelopment Plan by the City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach, the Redevelopment Agency wishes
to insure meaningful owner participation in the identification, evalua-
tion, selection and implementation of specific development proposals which
may occur within the Project Area,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington
Beach does resolve as follows :
Section 1. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach
will solicit the participation of existing property owners within the
Main-Pier Project Area in the redevelopment program as required under the
previously adopted Owner Participation and Re-Entry Rules .
Section 2 . The Redevelopment Agency, in consultation with partici--
pating property owners , will identify and pursue specific development
proposals for sites within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area .
Section 3 . Upon formulating a specific development proposal for a
site within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area, the Redevelopment
Agency will submit said development proposal to the owners of property
within said site for their consideration and approval. Before the Re-
development Agency can execute a disposition and development agreement,
or owner participation agreement, or both, to implement a development
proposal within the site which would require acquisition of property by
the use of eminent domain, the development proposal must be approved by
sixty percent (60%) of the owners of property within the site, by number
of owners , and at least sixty percent (60%) of the owners , by land area,
excluding public rights- of-way within said site .
Section 4 . For the purpose of implementing Section 4 of this Reso-
lution, the Redevelopment Agency shall utilize the map which is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" for determining the land holdings. of each- individual
owner and the number owners which will be eli 51e to vote on any
specific development proposal. Land holdings of an individual property owner
L within a site being considered as part of a development proposal will be
aggregated to one total amount of area representing one vote for said
property owner.
Section 5. With the adoption of this Resolution, the Chief Executive
Officer is authorized to develop administrative procedures to implement
the owner approval process as outlined above , and is also authorized to
amend the ownership map as ownership changes occur.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of September 1902 •
ATTEST:
Secretary Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM: INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT :
Lega —Co unse Director, !B`u�snirffletl—& Industrial Enterprise
APPROVED: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:
STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH
Chief Executive Offrcer BY: TOM CLARK
Speical Redevelopment Counsel
� ,I
�1 EXHIBIT "A"
Page 1 of 2
MAIN-PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
LAND HOLDINGS AND OWNERSHIP PATTERNS
d
v
or
I
I
11 1
I
�121 i31 i•; —,10 —� co� e
I I
m
N
STRFFT d 3m • > u v• n .'
7...— I I .o �� 3HL= L �o > c
x,-° LD .C,
1i4 I S 61 I t 1 c 44) W✓ •o
I.— I Ir�',•.11M I I N.- -- - -1 I L o
•3 I I ' I 1 •1 I I �, I o
IOC• I.-
133�J1S GY f
IIT cD � 1 I �• I it m v o Ew cs u
I�
-30vw% nx
i¢ u G w
I aLt� c .aw
l I L
y 1.2
u A u o
I J I LA K v•� w ti
a L ,a x > m
w y
o fL m m o
NC LLD
�•1 ,, 1 ti, -,i ..1 ,I 1 1 I I
I I i
�r:r .rrrlr
W
C
`, 133N1S NIV)Y i A
lu
1•4
r-------1 )--------1 ---------t r----------
,1 21 j L2b = 129 -d 134 •1 ,
1 e 135 5 '; Worthy, Norm 21
13(� -Y-- 1 ' Westmoreland, Clyde C. 22
—� 1------- T I - -. Z 1---------1 —
i22 1 ` 137 1 Energy Development-Corporation 23
—� —�� C--6--- i It-..-- - Z-11 f---------/ —
N� 7 1 Conley, John 24
r 3 16 1 I r5 1 1 6 r _ a 1 k Shupe, Margaret E. 25
-r--------Y 1 1 l- —=----1
`24 ¢ Aj5, _ 1 : i F32 Omohundro. Stuart W. et al 26
1
1 1 1 1 3 ! I , I r Cracchiolo, frank 27
4 _<< P r_T__ ��T_ .p. Wood, Blanche A. et al 28
1 f I i 177 "77
128 :,1 �40i30 '�3i 133 i Terry, Robert 29
lI ? 13 I 1 10 I I 12 .I r I 1�1 I 132 Bagstad, Eldon W. 30
Gosney, Jack L. 31
1 +' 1 1 1 1 1 .� 1 1 Abdelmuti, Admad Hamed 32
Baxter, Anna L. 33
Lindley, Mary B.
Terry, C. Victor 34
Mase, Ronald A. 35
r---------------------------------------------------,--i— Draper, Eleanor J. 36
f / 40 1 Wilson, Thomas E. 37
! Main Street Saloon (Gary Mulligan) 38
Watkins, Homer 39
To mean To mean tide City of Huntington Beach 40
tide line line and outer
limits of pier
v
a
m
A
r4
O
' N
Res. No. 48
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH)
I , ALICIA M. 'WENTWORTH, Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency -of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a
meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 7th day a
of September 1982 , and that it was so adopted by
the following vote:
AYES: Members:
Thomas, MacAllister, Mandic, Finley, Bailey, Kelly
NOES: Members:
None
ABSENT: Members :
Pattinson
Secretary of the Redevelopment gency
of the City of Huntington Beach, Ca.
t �
RESOLUTION NO. l 1 0
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ADOPTING PROCEDURES FOR
APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS WITHIN THE MAIN-
PIER REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach has prepared a proposed Redevelopment Plan for
the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project area; and
with the adoption of said Redevelopment Plan by the City
Council of the City of Huntington Beach, the Redevelopment Agency
wishes to ensure meaningful owner participation in the
identification, evaluation, selection, and implementation of
specific development proposals which may occur within the Project
Areas; and
The provision of meaningful owner participation
opportunities requires that accommodations be made among the
respective interests of owners;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach does resolve as follows :
Section 1 . The Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Huntington Beach will solicit the participation of existing
property owners within the Main-Pier Project Area in the
redevelopment program as required under the previously adopted
Owner Participation and Re-Entry Rules .
Section 2 . The Redevelopment Agency, in consideration
with participating property owners , will identify and pursue
specific development proposals for sites within the Main-Pier
Redevelopment Project Area .
1 .
Section 3 . Upon formulating a specific development
proposal for a site within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project
Area, the Redevelopment Agency will submit said development
proposal to the owners of the property within said site for their
consideration and approval . Before the Redevelopment Agency can
execute a Disposition and Development Agreement , or Owner
Participation Agreement, or both, to implement a development
proposal within the site which would require acquisition of
property by the use of eminent domain, the development proposal
must be reviewed by owners and tenants .
Section 4 . For the purpose of implementing Section 3 of
this Resolution, the Redevelopment Agency shall utilize the
current assessors parcel map at the time of project review by the
Agency for determining the individual owners, and the current
certificates of occupancy for determining these various tenants .
Section 5 . This Resolution supersedes Resolution No. 48
of the Redevelopment Agency (which Resolution No. 48 shall
hereafter be of no further force and effect ) .
Section 6 . With the adoption of this Resolution, the
Chief Executive Officer is authorized to develop administrative
procedures to implement the owner review process as outlined
2 .
above, and is also authorized to amend the ownership map as
ownership changes occur .
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,
1987 .
ATTEST:
Agency Clerk Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Agency Counsel Special Agency Counsel
INITIATED AND APPROVED: APPROVED:
Deputy City Administrator Chief Executive Officer
3 .
CORPORATE AGENCY SERVICE CENTER
BOX 37002
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94137 Bank of America
Date: March 31 , 1987
Parking Authority
City of Huntington Beach
P. 0. Box 19i
Huntington Beach , CA 92648
Attn: Alicai M. Wentworth Trust Number: 77972
Statement for services and expenses as Fiscal Agent for the
196E Parking Revenue Bonds
for the period from 9/01:G6 to 2!28/87
Please forward your remittance to CORPORATE AGENCY SERVICE CENTER
in the zel f'--addressed envelope. Thank you.
Semi--E-;rinu�.i AcJinirli�tr-a+_:i �::irl Fee
from _ /01/67 to 8/ 1/87 S 425. 00
Coupons Laid 196 ty 0. 15 29. 4C)
Irlt=�r;,,_t r':�id to Re��i�teri=d F�Cindhnl rirr•r=.
Checks is'=.-i._ied 1 re 0. 34 . 34
t-,:-i. stee directed 2 t-y 75. 00 150. 00
Subtotal
sq
Postage 5. 0':
Envelopes . 01
Co-agent Charges (Chase Manhattan) 2. 16
Subtotal A__ -7. h
TOTAL CHARGES 611 . 94
"TO AVOID A 2% SERVICE CHARGE (MINIMUM $10. 0 1 i FOR EACH MONTH
THIS BILLING IS OUTSTANDING, PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED IN OUR
OFFICE WITHIN 45 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS BILL. ** TO ENSURE
PROPER CREDIT, INCLUDE YOUR TRUST NUMBER WITH PAYMENT. **"
Tel . #624-4036 AJ #71
EDP-445 9-86
CL
t
ei
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION GEORGE R. REILLY
First District, San Francisco
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 1799, SACRAMEENTO, CALIFORNIA 95808) October 27, 1980 ERNEST J. DRONENBURG. JR.
(916/ 322-2323 Second District, San Diego
WILLIAM M. BENNETT
Third District, San Rafael
RICHARD NEVINS
Fourth District, Pasadena
KENNETH CORY
Controller, Sacramento
DOUGLAS D. BELL
Executive Secretory
TO: Redevelopment agencies, county assessors
and county auditors
Revised Map Specifications and Fee Schedule
for Redevelopment Protects
The Board of Equalization at its meeting of October 2, 1980 approved
revisions to the map specifications and fee schedul , for redevelopment
projects, effective January 1, 1981. A copy of the revised specifica—
tions and schedule is attached.
The fees shown therein do not apply to any projects for which filings
pursuant to Section 33327 of the Health and Safety Code are received
by the Board prior to January 1, 1981. The fees adr. Pted on December
159 1976 are applicable to such filings. Please ca' l Mr. Martin C.
Rohrke at 916/322-2323 if you have any questiuns abi It the new spec—
ifications and fees.
Sincerely,
NEILON M. JZI t ',S1 Chief
VALUATION DIVIS i )N
NMJ:dc
Attachment
- 3 -
(2) Maps of project areas shall be drawn to these minimum scales:
ACREAGE WITHIN PROJECT AREA MINIMUM MAP SCALES
under 10 acres 1" = 100'
10 — 40 acres 1" = 200'
40 — 200 acres 1" = 300'
200 — 1000 acres 1" = 400' or
1„ = 500'
over 1000 acres 1" = 600' to
1" = 1000'
If any segment of the boundary is shorter than 1140 of the map scale (i.e., 10 feet on a 1" = 400' scale map)
that segment should be shown enlarged on a marginal sketch.
(3) Every map shall bear a scale and north point. if a reduced map is to be filed, the original map
shall have a graphic scale affixed to it before the reduction is made. The reduced copies must meet the scale
requirements given in Section 2.
(4) All maps must be professionally drawn. Rough sketches or pictorial drawings are not acceptable.
(5) Redevelopment agencies filing pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33327 shall send
one copy of the map of the proposed or amended project area boundaries to county and taxing agency officials.
They shall furnish the State Board of Equalization with an unfolded reproducible map (sepia or duplicate
tracing). If facilities for making such a reproducible map do not exist, fifteen copies of the original map may
be furnished.
3. PROCESSING FEES. The fees indicated below shall accompany the Statement of Preparation. The amount of
$200 is considered to cover the cost of preparing the State Board of Equalization's portion of the fiscal impact
report. If a proposed project or amendment is terminated before adoption of the redevelopment plan, the re-
mainder of the fee will be refunded. A written notice of termination is required. Please make checks payable
to the State Board of Equalization.
ACREAGE IN PROJECT ACREAGE IN PROJECT
OR AMENDMENT FEE OR AMENDMENT FEE
0 — 10 $330 661 — 1500 $ 800
11 — 20 $350 1501 — 3000 $ 990
21 — 60 $420 3001 — 6000 $1,200
61 — 100 $520 over 6000 $1,700
101 — 660 $630
.. . -r•ync..!w�a;,":4E:nb'�.^J',vrfax_"mcPe3pes+w:carat o.mwa+.._.z..,..,....,—..__.,_. ..
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
REQUIREMENTS FOR BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS, STATEMENTS, MAPS
and
SCHEDULE OF PROCESSING FEES
for
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Sections 33327, 33328, 33328.4, 33375 and 33457,
Health and Safety Code.
Effective January 1, 1981
1. GENERAL APPLICATION. All statutory references herein are to the Health and Safety Code. The prepa-
ration of the report required by Section 33328 will not commence until the filing is accepted as provided in
Section 33328.3.
Subdivision maps, assessor's maps and deeds are not on file with the State Board of Equalization, nor are
such documents readily available to its staff in Sacramento where all processing at the state level is per-
formed. Boundary descriptions that merely cite recorded documents or refer to assessor's parcels are of very
limited value to the Board's draftsmen.
The maps filed pursuant to Section 33327 serve a dual purpose. First, they are transmitted by us to the public
utility companies whose property is assessed by the Board. Nearly 88% of all state-assessed property consists
of improvements and personal property. Much of this is in the form of "continuous structures" — power lines,
telephone cable, gas mains, and is located over or under streets and alleys. It is most important that the
relationship of project boundaries with streets is clearly and accurately delineated on the maps. In many
cases, state assessees will have to make measurements on these maps. Because of this, the accuracy of the
base year assessed values will be directly related to the quality of the maps sent to us. Secondly, the some
map can be used for filing under Section 33375, when they will be used in conjunction with the legal descrip-
tion to delineate the project boundaries on the Board's tax-rate area maps. This map work makes possible the
automatic derivation of subsequent changes in assessed values for tax increment funding purposes as a by-
product of future assessment rolls.
The requirements given in Section 2 herein were developed with the foregoing points in mind. In many cases,
these same requirements have existed for city or district boundary maps and descriptions for several years.
We are merely applying them to redevelopment projects.
Please mail all filings and amendments to: Valuation Division, State Board of Equalization, P.O. Box 1799,
Sacramento, CA 95808. Inquiries concerning maps, legal descriptions or fees should be sent to Mr. Martin C.
Rohrke. Questions concerning the determination of base year assessed values should be sent to Mr. Jay Hubert,
Valuation Division, State Board of Equalization, P.O. Box 1799, Sacramento, CA 95808. Please call
Mr. Hubert or Mr. Rohrke at 916/322-2323.
2. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS, STATEMENTS AND MAPS. All documents filed with us are microfilmed and
then recycled or destroyed on an annual basis. Any document that will not produce a readable photographic
image must be rejected and returned to the sender for replacement.
(a) BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS. Every boundary description mus! be self-sufficient within itself
without the necessity of reference to any extraneous document. A boundary description making reference only
to assessor's parcels, subdivisions or lots within subdivisions is not acceptable unless all dimensions needed
to plot the' boundaries are given on the accompanying project area map. When a description refers to a deed
or recorded document, such references should be secondary in nature. Our draftsmen should be able to plot
the boundaries from the legal description. For on amendment of boundary, the entire perimeter of the added
or deleted land must be described.
(b) STATEMENTS. The statement shall be in the form and style shown below. This form of statement is
also designed to satisfy the requirements in Section 33328 with respect to the selection of the base year
assessment roll.
2 -
STATEMENT OF PREPARATION OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OR
AMENDED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
(Name of Project)
TO: Auditor, Assessor, Tax Collector of County, to all other affected taxing
entities and to the State Board of Equalization.
Pursuant to Section 33327 of the California Health and Safety Code, you are hereby notified that the
Redevelopment Agency of the (Name of city or county) is in the process of completing a
redevelopment plan for the (Name of project) . It is the intention of
the Agency to complete said plan and to have it adopted pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment
Law.
It is the intention of the Agency to use the (fiscal year) roll as the Base Year Assessment Roll for the
allocation of taxes pursuant to Section 33670 of the Health and Safety Code.
Dated: Redevelopment Agency of
Check one only (Name of city or county)
(Signature)
Initial plan Name
Amended plan Title
(c) MAPS
(1) Every map must clearly show all existing streets, roads, and highways lying within or adjacent
to a line which is 300 feet from the boundaries of the project area, together with the names of these thorough-
fares. The relationship of the project area boundaries and the line which lies 300 feet from those boundaries
with street rights-of-ways must be clearly and accurately delineated. New boundary lines must not obliterate
right-of-way, subdivision or property lines. Suggested boundary line symbols are shown below. If.a map is
being filed for an addition to an existing project it is preferred that the map cover only the immediate vicinity
of the addition. A marginal key explaining boundary symbols is necessary. Do not show future street align-
ments or zoning on the project area boundary map.
• 30W radius
ui
a •
JMAIN ST.
Existing boundary
• � —Now boundary
' •�-300�perimstat
ST.
3ti• ,000
REQUESI' rOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ACTION
Date September 22, 1982
Submitted to: Honorable Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency
Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer
Prepared by: _10 Tom Tincher, Director of Business and Industrial Enterprise
Subject: AGENCY ACTION AUTHORIZING CLERK TO ACCEPT AND CONSENT TO DEEDS AND GRANTS
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attachments: eA.
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Attached is a resolution prepared by the City Attorney' s office which authorizes
the Agency Clerk (City Clerk) to accept and consent to deeds or grants conveying
any Agency interest or easement upon real property to the Redevelopment Agency.
This is simply a procedural step necessary to allow the Agency Clerk to carry out
this responsibility as part of her Agency obligation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached resolution.
ANALYSIS:
Government Code Section 27281 provides that a political corporation or govern-
mental agency may designate an officer to consent to deeds or grants. The attached
resolution establishes that the Agency Clerk may act to carry out this function
on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution
CWT:TT:jb
PI O 4187
/ 1
RESOLUTION NO. 51
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AUTHORIZING
THE CLERK TO ACCEPT AND CONSENT TO DEEDS
AND GRANTS
WHEREAS, Government Code §27281 provides that a
political corporation or governmental agency may designate
an officer to consent to deeds or grants .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach that it hereby
authorizes its Clerk, and his or her assistants and deputies ,
to accept and consent to deeds or grants conveying any
interest in or easement upon real property to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach for public purposes .
r-- PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on
the 4th day of October , 1982 .
ua
C airman
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Agency Clerk Legal Advisor �L
INITIATED AND APPROVED :
D . .� �.
Director of Business and
Reviewed and Approved: Industrial Enterprises
kY roo
ls�' iy
Chief Executive Off er
RCS :bb
` ,r . • i
Res. No. 51
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH)
I , ALICIA M. WENTWORTH, Secretary of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach at a
meeting of said Redevelopment Agency held on the 4th day
of October , 19 82, and that it was so adopted by
the following vote:
AYES: Members:
Pattinson, MacAllister, Mandic, Finley, Bailey, Kelly
NOES: Members:
None
ABSENT: Members :
Thomas
/41
or/
Secretary of-the a eve opment AgerWy
of the City of Hunting on ee'iL
z
IN THE
Superior Court
OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In and for the County of Orange
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH9
CITY CLERK PROOF OF PUBLICATION
NOTICE OF MEETING
Pl16LIC N01'ICE
State of California 1 Non CEOF,ME"MOF
EUNTQIG'fON BEACB_:;;
County of Orange )ss. l• `bREDEYELOP[VR?aITtAGBNCY
Jeannie L. Thomas NOTICE IS HEREBY-GIVEN-that al
,meetl.g"of the Hun' itBMgJRWe-
velopmeiit-geney'.iviDt:be°`heldjin�the
Goimcil`Chamtieraof't6e?`Civic'`Center;
Huntington�Beeeh;�et�the 6a`u'of}!30
That I am and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of R:M.or ea s000-ttieFeeftei as`tpaeeible';on
= the United States,over the age of twenty-one years,and that I Mondiy;.thit_1 `-dey�of.;Fetinery 1982
for the cpoee of reviewing.00neeptual
am not a party to,nor interested in the above entitled matter; I:.Pl*for Bueineaegpropeitiee:pro
that I am the principal clerk of the printer of the commercial deialopmenttit the
corcer of Warner Avenue eudrGoWeen dest�
Huntington Beach Ind. Review Street iu;the Cittyy.'a sWe0 Goldeniid
Redev elopment.Erojed�Area°Th:�pro
paged plan is to 6e located on ,15�►aerel
a newspaper of general circulation,published in the City of ette with 162641 egpare feet�bugdiug
Space.', . .
Huntington Beach Thy concepwel.p�,ito4-
v'U include Parking;_vehicular`circular
tion,,laiidscapmgt"eggne,.end f'tecOal
Count of Orange and which newspaper is published for the desi�' endcolor.ecliemeo`ftibropoduige
Y KP S�iiein"eee3PioDe+f+Se�'ie+propoe�c6y'to;
disemination of local news and intelligence of a general charac- build the developmentinpheeee w
ter, and which newspaper at all times herein mentioned had Dates Jan`28 1982ry'
CITY OF
NIB
and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, By,ALICIA-M_WENTWORTHj
and which newspaper has been established, printed and pub-
lished at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a Pub.Jan.;28,1982
g Beech
period exceeding one year; that the notice, of which the Hunt: Ind.Rev.tt 10760
annexed is a printed copy, has been published in the regular
and entire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement
thereof,on the following dates,to wit:
January 289 1982
I certify(or declare) under penalty of perjury that the forego-
ing is true and correct.
Dated at....Q a r.d.e n..G.r..o v e.......................
California,this 28.t.h.da•o
. ..... .................................
Signature
i Form No.CAF-81380
MINUTES
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Council Chamber, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
Monday, November 1, 1976
Chairman Wieder called the regular meeting of the Huntington.. Beach
Redevelopment Agency to order at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Bartlett, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Wieder
Members Absent: Pattinson, Shenkman
MINUTES APPROVED
On motion by Gibbs, second Bartlett, the minutes of the Special Meetings of
October 11, 1976 and October 20, 1976 were approved and adopted, as written and
on file in the Office of the Clerk. Motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bartlett, Coen, Gibbs, Siebert, Wieder
NOES: None
ABSENT: Pattinson, Shenkman
On motion by Gibbs, second Bartlett, the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting
of October 26, 1976 were approved and adopted as written and on file in the Office
of the Clerk. Motion carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bartlett, Gibbs, Siebert, Wieder
NOES: None
ABSENT: Pattinson, Shenkman
ABSTAIN: Coen
ADJOURNMENT
On motion by Bartlett, second Gibbs, the regular meeting of the Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Agency adjourned. Motion carried.
Chairman
ATTEST:
Clerk
City of Huntington Beach
P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 9260
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CALL FOR SPECIAL MEETING
OF
CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Harriett M. Wieder, Mayor
T. W. Bartlett, Councilman
Alvin M. Coen, Councilman
Norma Brandel Gibbs, Councilwoman
Ronald R. Pattinson, Councilman
Ron Shenkman, Councilman
Richard W. Siebert, Councilman
You are hereby notified that a Special Meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Huntington Beach, California, is called for and will be
held in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. on.
Monday, October 11, 1976, for the purpose of holding a joint public hearing with
the Community Redevelopment Commission to consider the proposed Redevelopment
Plan for the Huntington Beach Downtown Project Area.
3L���17'7 (, J.
Mayor, City of Huntington'Beach, California
ATTEST:
City Clerk
I hereby certify that I received the above notice, "Call For Special Meeting
of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency," prior to 7:00 P.M. , on Sunday,
October 10, 1976.
Mayo
Councilman
Councilman
Councilma .01
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
MINUTES
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Council Chamber, Civic Center
Huntington Beach, California
Monday, June 21, 1976
Chairman Wieder called the regular meeting of the Huntington Beach Redevelopment
Agency to order.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: Bartlett, Pattinson, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder
Members Absent: Coen
MINUTES
On motion by Pattinson, second Shenkman, the Agency approved and adopted minutes
of the adjourned regular meeting of 5/26/76 and regular meeting of 6/7/75 as written
and on file in the office of the Secretary. Motion carried.
REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY & SUB-COMMITTEE RE: FORMATION OF REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Mr. Harlow, Planning Director, presented information relative to the advisability
of the City Council retaining their memberhsip as the Redevelopment Agency and
appointing a Redevelopment Commission to work closely with them, delegating considerabl,
responsibility. He reported that a meeting had been held between the Mayor, Acting Cit;
Administrator, Planning Department, City Attorney and Dick Mitchell, former Director
of the Los Angeles Redevelopment Agency and that it was the consensus of the group
such a commission be established.
On motion by Pattinson, second Gibbs, the Agency referred the matter of establishing
a Redevelopment Commission to the City Council. The motion was passed by the following
vote:
AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder
NOES: None
ABSENT: Coen
RESOLUTION NO. 4 ADOPTED - PLANNING SERVICE CONTRACT WITH URBAN PROJECTS
The Secretary presented Resolution No. 4 for the Agency's consideration - "A RESOLUTION
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING A PLANNING SERVICE
CONTRACT WITH URBAN PROJECTS, INC."
Following a reading by title on motion by Shenkman, second by Pattinson, the Agency
waived further reading and adopted Resolution No. 4 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Bartlett, Pattinson, Gibbs, Siebert, Shenkman, Wieder
NOES: None
ABSENT: Coen
.R Page #2 - Redevelopmen*ency Minutes - 6/21/76 t
ADJOURNMENT
On motion by Pattinson; second Gibbs, the regular meeting of the Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Agency adjourned. Motion carried.
Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary
Page #3 - Council Minutes - 10/7/74
NOTICE OF COMPL6111.0N - MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - 21iASE II - CC-225 - Accepted
work on the Muni::ipal Corporation Yard, Phase II, - CC-225, completed by
Julian-Waterfield, fv. a Final contra-:t amount ui $862,379.35, and directed the
City Clerk to file a t;otice of Completion with the Orange County Recorder.
J V
AGREEMENT - CITY OF F6UNTAIN VALLEY - APPROVED - Approved an agreement between
the City and the City of Fountain Valley providing for the discharge of sewage
into the others system and authorized the Mayor and Clerk to execute same
on behalf of the City.
PROPOSED DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT BUDGET - 1974-75 - APPROVED - (CA 74-94)
The Clerk presented a communication from the City Administrator
transmitting the proposed downtown redevelopment budget for fiscal year
1974-75, and recommending that Council approve the transfer of funds for the
downtown redevelopment work from the contingency account (101593) to a separate
account number under the Department of Harbors, Beaches and Development budget.
The Director of Harbors, Beaches and Development reported on the redevelopment
work which had been necessary and the reasons for the request to transfer
funds. Discussion was held between the Council and the Director of Harbors,
Beaches and Development regarding the background of the matter.
Coy d- 3 I (W-cew 0-5 &— ��(/
On motion by Gibbs, Council approved the transfer of funds for the downtown
redevelopment work, from the contingency account (101593) to a separate account
number under the Department of Harbors, Beaches and Development budget. The
motion was passed by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Duke, 'oen
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Wieder
ABSENT: Matney J
FINAL TRACT MAP NO 8248 - ALL O): TT 7155 - A J HALL CORP - APPROVED
The Clerk presented a transmittal from the Planning Department
submitting final form of Tract Map No. 8248 - All of Tentative Tract No. 7155
for adoption as follows: A. J. Hall Corporation, San Diego, California; Location:
North of Palm Avenue between Goldenwest Street and Se•�,onteenth Street; Acreage:
11.067; Lots: 92.
The Planning Director reported on the arrangements which had been proposed to
satisfy Condition No. 6 of the Final Tract Map relative to recreation and park
fee requirements. Discussion was held between the Council and the Planning
Director regarding the matter.
A motion was made by Councilwoman Gibbs, to accept the offer of dedication and
improvement as shown on Final Tract Map No. 8248, all of Tentative Tract Map
No. 7155, located ncrth of Palm Avenue between Goldenwest Street and Seventeenth Street
examined and cert.iLfied by the Director of Public Works and the Secretary to
the Planning Commission as being substantially in accordance with the tentative
map as filed, ar.inded and approved by the Planning Commission. Acreage: 11.067;
Lots: 92; Developer: A. J. Hall Corporation, San Diego, California; adopted
the map subject to vtandard conditions set forth by the Department of Public
and the Pinning Comatissiar. in Resolution No. 3056 adopted October 20,
1969, vit additional stipulations as follows: