Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous Annexation Information 1957 to 1963 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION GEORGE R. REILLY First District,San Francisco 1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO 14 JOHN W. LYNCH (P.O. BOX 1799, SACRAMENTO 8) Second District,Fresno PAUL R. LEAKE Third District,Woodland RICHARD NEVINS Fourth District,Pasadena ALAN CRANSTON Controller,Sacramento DIXWELL L. PIERCE Secretary Mr. Paul C. Jones Huntington Beach City Clerk P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California July 2, 1963 Dear Mr. Jones : This is to acknowledge receipt of two complete filings. covering the Newland No. 2 Annexation to the City of Hunt- ington Beach. The documents appear to be in order, and we are enclosing our official acknowledgment for them. We note that one set of documents was addressed to the Board and the other to the Assessment Division of the Board. We actually need but one filing for each annexation. In order to expedite our handling of your filings, they should be sent to the attention of the Valuation Division of the State Board of Equalization, P. 0. Box 1799, Sacramento 8, California. For us to process your annexations for property, sales and use taxes, each filing should include the following: 2 copies of the ordinance containing legal description. 3 copies of the map, on two- of which the street ad- dresses are indicated. We do not require that an affidavit of completion be filed, but since they contain much useful information, they are gladly accepted. Very truly yours, td(t Martin C. Rohrke Supervisor of Drafting Services Valuation Division MCR:eo encl. GEORGE R. REILLY PROPERTY TAX DEPARTMENT 6' +rryp - FIRST DISTRICT,SAN FRANCISCO , RONALD B. WELCH 4 JOHN W. LYNCH °6m luau ASSISTANT SECRETARY SECOND DISTRICT,TULARE - flw Af0 PAUL R. LEAKE Y � L. JUDD EASTMAN THIRD DISTRICT,WOODLAND I CHIEF,VALUATION DIVISION RICHARD NEVINS ABRAM F. GOLDMAN FOURTH DISTRICT,LOS ANOELES OFFICE OF CHIEF,INTERCOUNTY ALAN CRANSTON, CONTROLLER STATE BOARD OF .EQUALIZATION EQUALIZATION DIVISION SACRAMENTO NEILON M. JENNINGS STATE OF CALIFORNIA ACTING CHIEF,ASSESSMENT STANDARDS DIVISION DIXWELL L. PIERCE,SECRETARY 1020 N STREET SACRAMENTO MAIL ADDRESS: P.D.Box 1799 SACRAMENTO S.CALIFORNIA Mr. Paul C. Jones Huntington Beach City Clerk July 1, 1963 P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California Your letter of June 26, 1963 Dear Ivor. Jones: This is to acknowledge receipt of the statement(s) , filed as required by Section 54900, et seq. , , of the Government Code by which certain uninhabited. territory- designated as "Newland #2 Annexation" was annexed to the City of Huntington Beach by Ordinance No. 967 on June 21, 1963 : x Legal description(s) of boundaries =Map(s) showing boundaries Resolution(s) No. 2 _Ordinance(s) No. 967 Other: The 1964 Board roll will reflect the action evidenced by the above statement (s) unless it is found to be inade- quate or its validity for assessment or taxation purposes is questioned. We will bring such a situation Co your attention. A copy of this acknowledgment has been sent to the Department. of Business Taxes. If they need additional information for local sales and use tax purposes they will notify you. V ry truly yours, L. J. EASTMAN, Chief eo VALUATION DIVISSON cc-Mr. Hugh. J. Plumb Orange County Assessor cc-Local Tax Unit - Room 307 AM w 16702 Dolores Sunset Heights Huntington Beach, California $= August 12, 1963 R City of Huntington 1BJJJJebch City Hall , Civic Center Huntington Beach, California Gentlemen: We are one of several property owners recently contacted by La Rue Realty Corporation concerning possible annexation to Huntington Beach. La Rue Realty has designated our property as AP #106-171 -17, which lies in the area east of Algonquin Street, North of Pearce Street and South of Heil Street. La Rue has further advised that all expenses involved in this annexation would be the responsibility of one of their clients who is building a de- velopment of apartment houses in the recently annexed area at the southeast corner of Heil and Algonquin Streets. They have also advised the yearly tax rate would be increased by $1 .33 per $100 assessed value of the property. We are most interested in this proposed annexation, since we are presently constructing a single family residence on our property, which faces Algon- quin Street; however, there is certain information which we would appreciate your supplying. 1 . La Rue advises his client will be required to improve city streets and to bring city utilities to his property. a. In light of the location of our property, how close will utilities be brought; specifically water and sewage? b. Will improvement of city streets affect Algonquin Street and if so, how soon could we expect the street to be repaired? 2. What assessments will the City of Huntington Beach impose upon the individual property owners for the improvement of the streets and for the connection of utilities? Naturally, our specific in- terest lies in how this assessment will affect our tax rate. Since our home under construction will be all electric, the only utilities we will require will be water and sewage; what will be the specific assessment for bringing these utilities to our property? 3. While we realize the area under contemplation is zoned R4, we would like to know the possibilities of having this area rezoned to R1 and what steps would have to be taken to have this accomplished. 4. If the area is incorporated into the City of Huntington Beach, what provisions are made by the city for trash and/or garbage collection? and what would be the monthly charge for this service? We would appreciate your prompt reply to this letter so we may intelligently -2- City of Huntington Beach August 12, 1963 consider this proposed annexation. Sincerely yours, r� Gustav C. & Dorothy B. Mohr M Hugust 23, 1963 i Mr. Gustav C. Mohr 16702 Dolores Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr : Mohr s , - Sr 1 In :repipyto your letter posing questions concerning the pro- posed annexation in your area, Ican supply you with answers to some. 0n others you will have to refer to La Rue. Realty Since they have . to do with the proposed plans of the Client. You question the assessment the City mightmight impose on property - . owners for the improvement of streetsand for the connection of utilities. Any improvements mad6.1� in areas annexed to the City will have bo be done through thb formation of improvement districts, the cost of which must be born by the property owners affected. You may obtain s**er connection charges by calling the City Engineering Department. Under the present ordinance of the City any property annexed to the City at this time would automatically come into the City as R-1, and any other zoning would have to be worked out through the Planning Commission. The Tax Rate for the City of Huntington Beach has been for the: past fouryears $1.33 per $100.00 assessed valuation; _Ada will continue to bb the same for the ensuing year. Trash and garbage collection on a biweekly basla is included. In regard to Mr. La Rue's Client, any subdivision that he makes would require that he improve City Streets and put in City utilities to his property. Since I an not _sure of your property, you 0 FI - Y j+ r Mohr ®2-- 8-23--G3 could check: with the City i'ngineering Department to see how close these services might be brought to your property. If I can be of further service to you in this matter, feel free to contact cue. Sincerely yours, I't' UL C. JOKES City Clerk Y3y Deputy PCJ:ed Enc: i 0 - BOLSA CHICA ROAD ` PROBLEM 1. To maintain a reasonable traffic flow within Huntington Beach when 1000 cars leave the Douglas Space Systems Center for the residential areas lying to the northwest and to the present southerly terminus of the San Diego Freeway. FACTS 1. The shortest rou-11 in distance to the objectives stated is north over Bolsa Chica Road from Rancho to Westminster. This is a two-lane road in extremely poor condition. 2 . When Douglas employes leave the parking areas at the end of the day shift, it is estimated that the two-lane road and the lack of left turn signals at Bolsa Chica Road and Westminster will cause traffic to queue from that intersection back solidly to the Douglas lots, making the road virtually impassible for 35 minutes or more. This will restrict the movement of Huntington Beach residents as well. 3 . Bolsa Chica Road and three or the four corners at its intersection with Westminster fall within the limits of the City of Seal Beach. That city estimates it will be September, 1964 before they could complete improvement of Bolsa Chica Road to four lanes . No left hand turn lanes or signals at the Westminster intersection are contemplated. 4. Traffic congestion of this magnitude may --- a. Adversely restrict the travel of the citizens of Huntington Beach. b. Adversely affect future industrial developments in Huntington Beach. Companies investigating the area have indicated that accessibility and traffic flow are prime factors in site selection. c. Adversely affect the growth of the Douglas Aircraft Company in Huntington Beach due to traffic conditions intolerable to its employes . POSSIBLE SOLUTION 1. The City of Huntington Beach could, with the consent of the City of Seal Beach, expeditiously annex the required right of way. 2 . The City of Huntington Beach could then promptly improve Bolsa Chica Road from Rancho to Westminster to a four-lane thoroughfare with northbound left turn lane and left turn signals at the Westminster intersection. 8-63 e s,T 1v1 1 N s T 4 v 711 il"Al S TE 1-1� 2fol 70 -aO' f,--7 E3 plz/if�z 14Y WA r- Z lot ez IUJ ca 332? HUNTINGTON ENGINE ERIN95 CORP. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS REPORTS PLANNING DESIGN INSPECTION WATERFRONT AND LAND DEVELOPMENT 7355 SLATER AVENUE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA VIKING 7-6027 January 22, 1963 Mr. James R. Wheeler, City Engineer, City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 Huntington Beach, California .Attention: Mr. Paul C. Jones, City Clerk - Auditor Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we are herewith submitting our proposal to prepare a annexation map and legal description of your proposed annexa- tion, located at the southwest corner of Heil Avenue and Graham Street. We propose to perform the above mentioned services for a fee not to exceed $100.00. Respectfully submitted, HUNTINGTON ENGINEERING CORP. William H. Duncan, Vice President WHD:mr October 31, 1962 'e Mr. R. V. Wise Supervising Surveyor County of Orange Santa Ana, California Dear Sir: . This is to inform you that an uninhabited annexation which was processed by the. County. Boundaries. Commission about a year ago, and known as "Sunset Heights Annexation, " was never completed. After submission of a petition, followed by "a supplemental pp�etition, the proponents failed to. btain the necessary 25% required to initiate the annexation. On January 2, 1962, the City Clerk presented a certificate of insufficiency from County Clerk Lynn B. Wallace, to the Council. We are transmitting herewith, a certified copy of the min- utes of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, covering this item. This should permit .your department to terminate proceedings on that particular annexation. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones i City Clerk PCJtaw enc. O ® City of Huntington Beach Califomia August 7, 1962 Mr. Gustav C. I4ohr, Jr. 7224 Lanai Street Long Beach E, California Dear Mr. Yiohr: . Your communication .to the Ma r of Huniti.ngton Beach, concerning proposed anAexatiorns eyithl in tone City, has -been referred to me. It is true that the City, is legally unable to supply water from -its lines to areas beg,wa she City Limits. From the description you' gave me, your lot- is contiguous to the City limits of the City of Huntington Beacon can the west side. If you can get enough of the property owners adjacent to your lot to form a-parcel large enough f©r considerati.o� by the Council, I believe. an annexation might be arranged. I am not familiar with the dcnsity jf population in this area and an uninhabited annex- is contingent on the number of property owners residing in' . the area proposed to be annexed. May I suggest that you come in and see me some day soon, and per- , hays we. can review the situation in your particular area. It would be better if you would call and. make an appointment, since I am in � and out of the office throughout the delay. Sincerely yours, Paul C. .zones City Clem FWLaw i 7224 Lanai Street Long Beach 8 , California July 25 , 1962 The Mayor City of Huntington Beach Huntington Beach, California Dear Sir: We have purchased a lot in Orange County, the legal des- cription of which is: Lot 7 , Block A. Tract 349, in the County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in book 159 Page 17 , Miscellaneous Maps , records of said Orange County. This lot is represented to be the fourth lot north of Pearce Street on the east side of Algonquin, Sunset Heights, Orange County, California. It is our intention to construct a single family dwelling on this property, and during the course of construction plan to live in a house trailer on said lot. Permits, etc. , for these plans have been applied for through Orange County. However, we face a problem with water. We have written to the City of Huntington Beach inquiring about a 16" water main which is now on the west side of Algonquin street and have been advised that since we are not in the city limits we cannot tap into said main. We have heard through various sources that an area in Sunset Heights is to be annexed to Huntington Beach within a year. Since the problem of water has our plans "hanging in air," so to speak, we would appreciate any advice you can give us con- cerning this proposed annexation to Huntington Beach, such as the actual location involved and the proposed time this anne- xation will take place. Our reasons for the above request for information are that we hope to prevent the necessity for drilling a water well, and making other provisions for water. Your prompt attention to the above is appreciated. Sincerely yours, Gustav C. Mohr, Jr. *m Cate 7 e _untington BeRchref April 19, 1962 U Mr. Millard T. Chase 16897 Coast Highway Sunset Beach, California Dear l r. Chase: I. am enclosing herewith a summary sheet of the first steps required in the processing of an annexation of inhabited tebritory. This is pursuant to a conversation which was hold between you, the City Administrator and myself . last week* After reading same,, or if under zany c rcumstances you have any questions,, feel free to. contact me. . The City stands ready to cooperate with you in this matter at all tines. However$ as Mr, Miller pointed out, .we hesitate to take an active part in the early proceedings, lest your people get the idea eve are land grabbing. In Any event, feel_ free to call me or come to. my office at. any time to discuss this matter. Sincerely yours, Paul C. Jones City Clerk PCJ:aw enc. i SUINMU',RY OF M,,1JOR PRELIMINA-ZY STi;11­' IN Tilk" ANNi�XATION OF INHABITZO Ti.,J�Z'isITORYTO TiL, CITY 1. It is suggested that when you are sure you have more than 25% of the registered voters in the area proposed to be an- nexed, ready and willing to go ahead with this matter, you direct a letter to the City Council marked to the attention of the City Clerk, requesting the consent of that Body to :)roceed with other steps in the proposed annexation. If the Council expresses its approval, they will give such consent and refer the matter to the City "lanning Coiiimission for a report or recoi.,imendlation. It might be well when �)resenting the letter requesting Council permission to proceed, to in- clude therein a request that the Council ,juthorize the City ,:ngineer to assist in the preparation of maps and descript- ions of the area proposed to be annexed. 2. Following receipt of consent by the Council, you, as propon- ents of the annexation, submit a maj) and specific legal de," scription of the boundaries of the proposed territory to be annexed, to the Secretary of the County Boundary Commission. (ilresently, the Boundary Commission required both the map and description to be a sepi, copy) . Submission must be made to the Commission by 5 :00 11.11. on any Monday for that Body to consider same at their meeting on the following- Monday. 3. Following receipt from the Boundary Commission of information that the boundaries of the area proposed to be annexed have been found to be reasonably definite and certain, proponents then must publish a "Notice of Intention to Circulate Annex- ation Petition" , at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City. "Vithin 10 days after cir- culdtion, proponents file the notice, statement and affidavit of publication with the City Clerk. 4. '.Within 15 days after the filing of affidavit of publication, the City may adopt a Resolution approving the circulation of the petition. This prohibits other proceedings for 50 (lays. In no event shall a petition be circulated before the Council has adopted this Resolution approving the circulation of same. This annexation petition may be circulated 21 (lays after pub- lication of the notice of intention to circulate. (Assuming of course,, that the Council has adopted the ;resolution of Con- sent.) 5. Thy petition shall contain a description of the new territory proposed to be annexed, ask that it be annexed anda copy of the proposed notice of intention and accompanyig statement. i;hen you reach this stage, we will assist you regarding signat- :'age `. Summary, Re : Annexation ure requirements. The date of signing should be affixed. '�e will also provide you with a form of Affidavit of the Circulator which must be attached to each petition. The Petition must be filed within 6 months of the earliest date on which a signature was affixed. G. The petition is then filed with the legisl<.tive body and the ;ity Clerk shall within 2 weeks check the petition and certify to the sufficiency thereof. The Petition must be signed b� not less than one—quarter of the qualified electors living within the territory to be annexed. if petition,, , when filed, is found to be insufficient , supplemental petitions can be filed within 10 days of the date of the certificate of insuf— ficiency. Receipt by the legislative Lody of a sufficient let— ition gives it jurisdiction over the proceedi�-,gs, and until the ,proceedings are tz -filtnated, no others can be commenced. After these preli.Anary steps have been made, we will be in a position to direct you in any further steps. G, M9LD9M ��'� �pp � _ 'IL,AV'm�cVN M, ?G1G3mgm SANTA ANA, CG4UFORtr19 A @C3PV-77 August 12, 1960 County Surveyor and load Cowmia a_l.on r WtghwAy Department Court House Annex Santa Ann9 California D`c r Sir- In your letter of Augu5t 11, 1960, you have requested San opinion of this office as to mbether or not a County Boundary Co miasion, in connection with annexation proceed- Aga s ubm-i ted to its, may require that the municipal body we eating an approval on the boundaries submit a metes d hounds description of the territory to be annexed, In 5 0= Atty. Gen. 259, the Attorney General0 a Office was cAM Ur an interpretation of the then Political Code Section 3720, ,presently Sections 54900 and :54901 of the Gone ca.._ent Code, pertaining to the filing of boundary de- acr ptione with the State Board of Equalization, In that situation, the Attorney General was asked whether or not the Sate Board of Equalization could require that the inho aa;ation submitted to it under the terms of 54901 be in the form of a metes and bounds description rather the a deacr pt ion which relied upon certain other recorded. infor- mation .rich could be toured only in the Offices of the County Recorders in order to establish some of the boundaries, Even though a description incorporating other recorded maps would be a sufficient "legal description" for most purposes, the Attorney General°s Office determined that as used in Section 54901, "Legal description" meant a metes and bovads description. An arriving at Chia ccnclu- Kono they relied on the fact that the administrative linga of the State Board of Equalization had been issued almoat sioultaneously with the enactment of the code sec- tion and as the Legislature had not seen fit to m1ke any change in the code section as a result of the administrative ruling, this was evidence that the administrative agency had carried out the intent of the Legislature �.; oG'p�yAz� t ff'-"t -tt ivIumc,n Ome (,-,f ;tea pump aaas ®� � *aaic 41T 1 i ri a4i�55� a ego-._ o o x to de -A S q CO *agi ma�CcriSlkc 114?st�saa :e � � � atf�� Xich will ben2L�Scc� Vhca Ojz*; 6 Poaz4 of Z *, Uzat.ica under Sect - Zk 0�gclAc? cal--0,g§iO l is Corxvc-t in '-,�,VgiStin& that any dvac p= W,( e t5 iz C ii,h *za noZ of thin type. Very �-=Ay yours m tepee _ � wags and e opp @ iM tit JCS o ft r \ � G 1 G. R. ESTABROOK A. S. KODH � �b DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR }w COUNTY SURVEYOR AND R. B. VAILE ROAD COMMISSIONER z . HIGHWAY DIVISION ENGINEER L. McCONVILLE \ M. I. STORM ASST. COUNTY SURVEYOR REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER AND ROAD COMMISSIONER TELEPHONE: HIGH ENGINEERING BUILDING WAY DEPARTMENT DONIS BARRETT KIMBERLY 7-3311 CEXT. 2923 BUSINESS MANAGER 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Apri 1 10 , 1961 Suggestions for the Preparation - of Descriptions for Annexation Boundaries Since the County Surveyor's Office is charged with the responsibility of certifying to the "definiteness and certainty" of any description of an annexation area to the Boundary Commission, as provided in Section 35002, Government Code, the following suggestions are offered in the hope that they will relieve some of the problems confronting the proponents of these annexation areas. Quoting from the opinion of the Orange County Counsels' Office, dated August 12, 1960: "It is our opinion that since one of the purposes of the study by the Boundary Commission is to develop adequate accurate information for the subsequent filing which will be required by the State Board of Equalization (under Section 5490) the Boundary Commission is correct in insisting that any descriptions filed with it contain a metes and bounds description and should cor- rectly refuse to accept any descriptions submitted to it which are not of this type. " This is signed by Stephen K. Tamura, County Counsel. In order for the County Surveyor's Office to certify in accordance with this opinion by County Counsel, it becomes necessary for the County Surveyor to be very careful in his analysis of any description submitted by a proponent. He must place himself in the position of not knowing where this land is. He must con- sider that he has never heard of this area before and in making a correct analysis, must assume that this is something new and alien to him; that he has no access to any previous record; that he probably has before him only a copy of an existing boundary, as previously described. With this attitude, he proceeds to read the description submitted, so it becomes imperative that the point of beginning of this description be very definite. If it begins in an existing city boundary or district boundary, it must describe beyond any doubt the position of the beginning portion on the existing boundary. The next thing to be considered is whether or not the line being described leaves or follows the existing boundary, so this must also be noted in the description, i. e. , "thence, leaving said existing boundary, etc. , or thence, following said boundary etc. " In describing courses and distances, it is imperative that each line be given a definite bearing. That is to say, North 200 E., instead of Northeasterly. The use of the cardinal directions is permitted in which one could say "North" but this would be presumed to be due North, East, South or West as the case may be. Also, it is important that when an existing boundary is cited, or an angle point therein, that the proper nomenclature that established this boundary also be shown. That is, the name or number of the certified annexation which created this point. In most cases the distances probably would be given in a mor.•e or less "style. " That is to say, "Thence, North 200 East along the existing City boundary 1320. 00 feet to an angle point in said boundary. " The use of secondary calls in this type of description is almost imperative. The more information given tcl describe where the line is, makes it that much more definite. It must be para- mount in.one's mind to remember.that the person in the Sacramento State Board of Equalization-does not have access to any County records. Therefore, calls that SAFETY PAYS-ON THE JOB; IN THE HOME: ON THE HIGHWAYS - -u Suggestions for preparation of de- scriptions for annexation boundaries refer to the record must be qualified by secondary calls. This is not intended to imply that such a call as "along the North line of Tract No. 3671 M.M. 134, Pages 30 to 32, Records of Orange County" is not in order, as this further clarifies the intention. In general, a course must follow one of these existing situations: A boun- dary line, a record title line or a record right of way line, and this quality of "following" a line must be clearly stated. The bearing and distance of any line should be the same as the legal reference for the line, or a reference given, if the bearing and distance is taken from another source. Such secondary reference can be in an abbreviated form. Should a course in the description either leave or join an existing line of a previous annexation in the middle of the course described in the previous annexation, it may be necessary to show this course in two parts. That is to say that if the boundary intersection of two cities is passed in this course, it would be necessary to state "to an angle point" in one boundary, which is also an angle point in the boundary of the other municipality, etc. In a case of street right of way lines, the following is in order: The line must be clearly defined by street widths, or as parallel with a specific distance from the center line. It must be remembered these right of way lines are subject to modification at a later date, so it is necessary that the right of way width be described at the time of the de- scription for the annexation. Also, it is important that the map and the description be compatible in every sense, since they have to be treated as part of the same. The distances and bearings on the map must agree with the calls of the description. The maps should also have a legend on them indicating the symbols used for the existing boundary and a symbol for the annexation boundary as a minimum. The map should indicate the name and/or number of each annexation previously certified which adjoins the proposed annexation and which is referred to in the description. In closing a "legal description" to most Engineers and Surveyors, is some- thing that is "surveyable" and this is generally true. However, in the description of the boundaries, this is not necessarily true and another attitude as explained above has to be assumed. -2- ANNEXATION OF INHABITED TERRITORY ("Annexation Act of 1913" Any territory proposed to be annexed to the city containing twelve or more registered voters is designated as an inhabited annexation and is processed under the Annexation Act of 1913 (Secs. 35100, et seq. , Gov. Code) . This Act requires an election to be held within the area. This Act demands much detailed work by the City Clerk' s office, this includes the checking in original affidavit of registration books of signatures which appear on petitions , and the legal publication of such items as council resolutions and ordinances . In addition, upon complete approval of the annexation, notices must be sent to a variety of state, county and city officials. These must be sent promptly and in correct form. The City Clerk' s office must handle such matters systematically so that each step in the process receives attention at the proper time. Name of Annexation- Petitioner- Total Area- Date Petition to Commence Proceedings Filed with City Clerk Petition Referred to City Planning Commission by City Council Petition to County Boundary Commission Filed Report from County Boundary Commission Filed Council Resolution # consenting to commencement of proceedings adopted Notice of intention to circulate petition published by proponents (one time) Affidavit of publication and copy of notice filed with City Clerk (within 10 days after publica- tion) Council resolution # consenting to circula- tion of petition adopted within 15 days after filing of affidavit) Circulation of petition commenced (more than 21 days after publication of notice) Petition filed with Cit Clerk (within 6 months after first signature Certificate of City Clerk and Registrar of Voters as to sufficiency of petition filed with City Council (within 2 weeks after receiving peti- tion) Supplemental petition filed (within 10 days, if necessary) Council resolution # of intention to call special election and setting hearing date (not less than 15 days nor more than 40 days) Adopted Resolution published in news aper) in territory (once a week for 2 weeks Date Notices mailed by clerk to owners requesting (not less than 20 days before hearing) Hearing held (not less than 15 nor more, than 40 days after passage of resolution) Council resolution or ordinance # calling election (not sooner than 54 days nor later than 75 days) adopted (or) Council resolution # terminating the proceedings Adopted Notice of annexation election published in (newspaper) (Once a week for 4 weeks in newspaper outside city but in county) Resolution or ordinance calling election published in (newspaper) Election held Council resolution # declaring election results adopted Ordinance approving annexation given first reading Ordinance approving annexation given second reading Ordinance # approving annexation adopted Ordinance Ik approving annexation effective Ordinance # approving annexation published in (newspapers (or posted) When effective, certified copy of ordinance sent to Secretary of State together with City Clerk' s certificate Date certified copy of ordinance filed by Secretary of State Certificate of City Clerk, ordinance with legal descrip- tion and a map sent to county assessor and to State Board of Equalization Affidavit of compliance sent to county recorder Certificate, ordinance and/or map sent to city and county departments and others on list, i.e. Pacific Fire Rating Bureau, Census Bureau, Utility Companies , etc. Council resolution # taking territory out of fire district adopted Council resolution # accepting streets into city system adopted Resolutions (last two) sent to proper authorities INHABITED TERRITORY ACT OF 1913 (35100 et seq) Value of land: $ Date rec. Date action NAME: City Clerk City Council Req. to commence proceedings referred to Planning Commission 35108 Report of Planning Commission received: 35002 Report of Or. Co. Boundary Commission received: Consent of Council to commence proceedings . RESOLUTION NO. 35111 Notice of intent to cir. petition published by proponents . Date AFFIDAVIT of Notice .of Intent filed: 35113 RESOLUTION NO. (Rec. affidavit & approve cir. of petition) NOTE: Report of Or. Co. Boundary Commission must be received before petition. RECEIPT OF PETITION: 35116 (Clerk & Co. Officer check petition within 2 wks) RESOLUTION NO. (Intent to call special election and date for public hearing) DATE 35118 Public Hearing held not less than 15 days, nor more than 40 days . 35119 Written notices mailed to property owners 20 days before hearing. DATE 6066 PUBLISH RESOLUTION (Once a week for two weeks in paper published in the territory, or if none, in paper within�' tity. (Hearing to be at least 7 days after final publication) DATES PUBLISHED: 35120 PUBLIC HEARING: DATE Continued to: DATE 35122 COUNCIL CALLS SPECIAL ELECTION: DATE (Res .-) (Not sooner than 54 days , nor' later than 75 days) 35123 PUBLISH NOTICE OF ELECTION (once a week for 4 weeks) in paper outside city. Dates of publication R , ,Date rec. Date Action NAME: City Clerk City Council 35126 Polling Place: 35127 Inspector: Judge: Judge: 35132 CANVASS RETURNS: Date (next reg. meeting after expiration off " days or 6 days if absentee ballots have been issued) RESOLUTION ON CANVASS ORDINANCE NO. (1st read. ) (Final read. ) Ordinance published; Date Mailed to Secretary of State: Date Filed by Secretary of State: Date INHABITED TERRITORY ACT OF 1913 (35100 et seq) Value of land: $ ,._._________ _- Date rec. Date action NAME: City Clerk, City Council Req. to commence proceedings referred toC�l �` �'�`^" 35108 Report of`\C.P..0 received: 35002 Report of Or. Co, Boundary Commission received: Consent of Council to commence proceedings. RESOLUTION NO, 35111 Notice of intent to cir, petition published by proponents. Date AFFIDAVIT of Notice of Intent filed: 35113 RESOLUTION NO. _o (rec. affidavit & approve cir', of petition) W NOTE: Report of Or, Co, Boundary Commission must be received before petition. RECEIPT OF PETITION: 35116 (Clerk & Co. Officer check petition within 2 wks) RESOLUTION NO® _ (Intent to call special election and date for public hearing) DATE 35118 Public Hearing held not less than 15 days, nor more than 40 days. 35119 Written notices mailed to property owners 20 days before hearing. DATE 6066 PUBLISH RESOLUTION. (Once a week for two weeks in paper published in the territory, or if none', in paper within city. (Hearing to be at least 7 days after final publication) DATES PUBLISHED: 35120 PUBLIC HEARING: DATE Continued to: DATE 35122 COUNCIL. CALLS SPECIAL ELECTION: Date_ (Res, __._____) (Not. sooner than 54 days, nor later than 75 days) 35123 PUBLISH NOTICE OF ELECTION (once a week for 4 weeks) in paper outside city. Dates of publication: 35126 Polling Place: 35127 Inspector: Judge: _ Judge: s 35132 CANVASS RETURNS: Date (next reg.. meeting after expiration of 3 days or 6 days if absentee ballots have been issued) RESOLUTION ON CANVASS ORDINANCE NO, (1st read. ) (final read. ) Ordinance published: Date_ Mailed to Secretary of State: Date Filed by Secretary of State: Date CITY OF A , r AHEIM, CALIFORNIA i TIMETABLE OF ANNEXATION INHABITED TERRITORY .(prepared by Harry Y-Jilliams and Bill Sorensen) lm. Proponents should file petition requesting the City. Council ° s consent to annexation® 2e City Council should refer the matter to the Planning Commission for its report or recommendation (35108) . 3m The Council_ should not act upon: the request for annexation until receiving a report o,r recommendation from the Pla1'ning Commission® If such. report is not received from the Planning Commission within 40 days from the date it is tef2rred , the Council may act. without such r^port or _recommendation (35108 and 35109) . 44 The City Council shall consent , before any annexation proceed- ings are ca mimenced (35106) m 5® The. proponents should submit the description to the Boundary Commission after the consent of the City Council has been obtained (35002) , 6. The Boundary Commission must report within 20 days and if it does no.t , the description is deemed correct, (35002) e 7e Proponents shall publish a notice of intention to circulate a petition for annexation (35111 and Elections Code 1702 - 1703) a 8. `llvithin 10 days after publication of notice, . a copy of the affi - davit of publication and a copy of the notice with accompanying statement shall be filed with the Clerk (35112) . 9e !hfithin 15 days after such filing, ,City Council adopts a resolution acknowled ing receipt of the notice and approving circulation of petition Uj113) e 10. ., If Council .adopts resolution required by 351.13, then petition may be circulated 21 days after publication (35114 ) . l0a® Note: If the property to be annexed is to be taxed for 'bonded indebtedness of the city previously incurred , or improvements . of the city previously constructed, then the petition should contain reference to this (35147 ) 11, When a petition signed by not :less than 1/4 of the qualified electors is received , City Clerk and County Registrar of Voters must chec,: she petition and certify its sufficiency witihi.n two weeks (35116) . 12. If petition is itisu-f icient , supplemental petition may be filed V,litri_n ?C drays 13. If the certificate shows petition is sufficient , Council with- out delay shall pass a resolution of intention to call a special election (35116) . 14. A hearing on. the intention to call the election shall be held not less than 15 no27 more than 40 days after passage of the resolution of intention (35118) . 15, The Clerk shall cause a copy. of the resolution' to be published at least once a week for the two weeks prior to the hearing (35119) 16. The Clerk shall mail written notice of the proposed annexation to each owner of ,equitable or legal interest in land within the territory to be annexed who has filed his name and address and description; of the land with the Clerk. Such notice shall be mailed coot less than 20 days before the public hearing (35119) 17. %,Vrittenl protest to proposed annexation may be filed by owners of property within the area to be annexed not. later than the hour set for hearing (35120) . 18.. .If at time of hearing there are irsufbicieht protests on file, supplemental protests may be filed within 10 days. (35120) l9. If protests are filed by the owners of one-half of the value of the te:critory proposed to be annexed, the proceedings shall terminate (3512).) 20. If no majority. protest, and if the Council elects to proco :c, , the Council_ may reduce the area proposed to be annexed '.)gyp' noi. more than 526 ('3;;121.5) 21. If no majority protest , City Council shall call a .special election without delay or adopt a resolution terminating the proceedings (35112) . 22. The alection shall be held not sooner than 54 days and not later than 75 days after the termination of the hearing on protests (35122) . 23. The City Coi,ncil shall cause the Notice of election to be pub- lished at least once a week for the four weeks prior to the election (35123) . Notes The embers in parentheses refer to sections of the .Government Code, runless otherwise designated. The above .table does :not take into consideration any delay which may be caused by a previously (riled petition for incorporation or annexation by another city. The foregoing does not contain any reference to the steps which must be taken irm the event the election cn the annexation is favorable to the annexation. -2- INGTpN� City of �-iuntigton beach CppNTY GPI California April s. 17 `001mcilken gentlemen# TIle total a0aOS60,4 value oS- the land ih f o o d Total tsc roll, log value o orbwritten been f Iled O 04 asaeaiW + . t Ji, L.. Renridkoen, Iork of thd city O Osts filed are 0,00 t o l e total a r4eased Valua ion ir. a0cord ee with. . asse0ament roll of the County 1 6060re dotal ,protest oval e � - land VaIU ro .eat r0tez 6' g xr� of total assesoed ° juatjo* the total y Viand valuation _ A GEORGE R.REILLY '�� , 1 �• UATION DIVISION FIRST DISTRICT,"N FRAIICI.CO //Ft \` '`".'�,..m.,'�� '� t3 LEY E.TRAVIS JAMES H.QUINN o �� CHIEF SECOND DISTRICT.OAKU ND �.S.y..� •..t 7 ECEIVF - ?. CB IR HUTSON PAUL R.LEAKS /� A,S�,ISTANT CHIEF %..IIRD DISTRICT,WOODLAND - ,958 ROBERT E.McDAVID efty Of �OFFICE OF Red FOURTH DISTRICT.LOB ANGELS.^, ` I, CITY CLERK u FQOBERT C.KIRKWOOD.CONTROLLER STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZA�'ION % i 1 SACRAMENTO N STATE O F C A L I F O R N ! A ;;_`j `1 ,' DIXWELL L,PIERCE,SECRETARY 1020 N STREET AIL ADDRESS:P.O, BOX 1799 SACRAMENTO SACRAMENTO S.CALIFORNIA May 29, - 1958 Mr. J. L. Henricksen, City Clerk and Administrative Officer for the City of Huntington Beach City Hall Huntington Beach, California Dear Mr. Henricksen: This is to acknowledge receipt of the statement(s) ,. filed pursuant to Section 54900, et seq. , of the Government Code, set- ting forth with respect to the annexation of territories known as t1North .No. 2 Annexation" and "North No. 3 Annexation" to the City of Huntington Beach: x Legal description (s) of boundaries x Map (s) indicating boundaries Resolution (s) x Ordinance (s) Nos.685 and 686, respectively Order (s) Other: The 1959 Board Roll will reflect the action evidenced by the statement ( s) , unless its validity for assessment or taxa- tion purposes is questioned by an interested party. We will, of course, bring any such question to your attention. The following applies only in the case of the formation of, or an annexation to, a city within a county having a con- tract with this Board for state administration of local sales and use taxes: Filing is adequate for sales and use tax purposes. Sales Tax Division w' ask for additional information. 4BOLE ry trul o , � E. TRA IS, Chief VALUA ION DIVISION aw cc-Mr. Hugh J. Plumb Orange County Assessor cc-Miss Kane, Permit Section O OFFICE OF y STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1020 N STREET MAIL ADOREss, P.'O.BOX 1799 SA C R A M E N T O SACRAMENTO 8.CALIFORNIA Procedure for Filing Future Notices of Annexation and New Streets Pursuant to Sections 54900, et seq., of. the Government Code, you are required to furnish this Board with a map showing the boundaries of each area annexed to your city and. a legal description of the area. Under Article II, Section J, of the contract between your city and this Board for state administration of local sales and use taxes, your city must also notify this Board of each annexation, giving the address of the property in the annexed area which is nearest to the extended city boundary on every street crossing that boundary. You may meet both these requirements by sending one copy of the legal description of the area and three conies of the map. The map should be accompanied by three copies of a list of all names of streets wholly or,, partially within the annexed area. With respect to each such street, the list should show (1) that all addresses on a street are within the city if the street is wholly inside the city (and there is no other street of the same name served by your city post office); (2) the inclusive numbers of addresses within the city on a street that is partly inside and partly out- side the city; or (3) that odd. or even address numbers, as the case may be, or odd or even numbers between certain limits, are within the city on a street that serves in whole or .in part as a boundary of the city. In the event the annexed area is uninhabited or undeveloped, the foregoing information with respect to street names and numbers should be furnished to us as soon as it becomes available. Likewise, we should be informed of any new streets or extensions opened in other parts of the city, any changes in city street names, any renumbering of streets that brings numbers within the city that were formerly outside or vice versa, and any changes in postal addresses from route and box numbers to city street num- bers. Receipt of this information by us will assure your city of credit for local sales and use taxes collected from all sellers whose places of business are within the city limits. CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION NORTH ANNEXATION No. 2 Street Names House Number Limits House Number Adjacent to Old City Boundary Bolsa Chita Road Even Nos. 14602 to 15998 15998 Graham Street 14251 to 15999 15999 Springdale St. 14341 to 15999 15999 Bolea Avenue 5001 to 6499 Smeltzer Avenue Odd Nos. 5001 to 6749 5001 to 6749 NORTH A11,411TEXATIU-4 No. 3 Goldenwest Street 15501 to 15999 15999 Sugar 2venue 7501 to 7749 Smeltzer Avenue Odd Nos. 6751 to 7999 6751 to 7999 NORTH ANNEUTION No. 2 Street Names Rogee Number Limits Hoizee Number Adjaoent to Old City Boundary Bolea Chioa Road Even I'Vos. 14602 to 15998 15998 Graham Street 14251 to 15999 15999 Springdale St. 14341 to 15999 15999 Bolsa Avonue 5001 to 6499 Sm.eltzer Avenae Odd Hoso 5001 to 6749 5001 to 6749 NORTH ANNEXATION No4 3 Goldenwest Street 15501 to 15999 15999 Sugar Avewae 7501 to 7749 Smeltzer Avenue Odd Nos. 6751 to 7999 6751 to 7999 r d^ 1HINFIA-P-1. m -.RRI It the territory sought to be annexed is already subdivided, and 3f the design of the suli di vision and the cons truct.1.1ct of buildint.9 deg not comply with the standards, that is the ordinances of this city, consent must be secured from, the Clity Council after a report and recommendation from the planning co.~viesion. Thereforc, the first step. would be for the l%proveme nt Association to request st consent of the City Council of 14antington Beach. After receiving the request the city council is required to sub- it the reWest to the pLmninp coo ission, vho musty make a report tvitthin forty days thereafter, or the city council may act without the report. After consent: has amen obtained the proponents must -.=bush a notice of intwition to circulation a petition for acznexation. Ibis notice shall contain the names of the propcownts ititandine, to ci:rcu latia the petition, and a description of the specific boundaries souOht to be ar axed. Also a state- tue nt not exceeding 500 words in luxe th „of the reason.s for the ;proposed anziaxe.- ti . Apparently the notice: must be published in tho city to which the territory y voul d.use annexe di Within tern days after the publlcatton of the notice the proponents shams file e cc p of the notice, to with an affidavit of publication, w�'iVi the cityalerk: Twmtyr one days after publication the proponents cir- culate the oeti.tion iwithln the area sought to be annwce& The poti.ti.ont to qual.ifly, shall be signed by riot leso than one fourth in number of the qualified electors resict4mr, within the territory des- cribed wig the petition, as shower .toy the registration of voters in the co'.Mty° Mtn which the `tervi.'tory i:e si<tuaat;ed: After the petition is presented the city must: pass s resolution of Intention to calla special election] describing the territory and at the same time giving toti ees of a hearing; thegreoa: The hearing, shall be hold not less than fifteen near more than forty days from state of passage of the r.eso- luti;on i 2. PPPP- The resolution must be published once a week for two successive veeks in the territory proposed to be anuexods if there ir, a newspaper in such area., if -nots then within the city to which said area seeks to be imaxed. If tho omers of more *.art fifty per cent of the parcels involved protest,, the proceedipgs then must &bat-*. Ykmevar., if the proteat Is not sufficient the legialative body mu8t,, without deldyj, call a special election, In the terAtory proposod to be annmmd. If the election, carriea the city council may alther by ordinerace approve of the annexation,, or if they fail to co, do,, then thkey must sulmit the proposed annexation to the electors re— siding in the ciV. 7he ordinance or report of the election must be filed in the oMee of the Secretary of State rich completes tho mmexation. taps also, must be filed with the State Board off'.Squalization aid Goianty Assoosor. SUGGESTIONS TOWARD an ANi1EXATION POLICY Whether or not the City should annex any territory or a certain territory cannot be positively determined by a general set of criteria or rules. Action may be guided by pre-determined standards, but the actual decision should also include specific considerations attached to the given area. These may include existing development, potential use, special future use for city purposes, peculiar difficulties, surrounding situations relative to annexation and incorporation, and whether or not the land is State or Federa]lyowned. Listed below are items which attempt to point out some more or less general considerations in the matter of annexation and which, as noted above, might have to be modified to suit a specific case. Immediately following are five conditions which would suggest unfavorable action on annexations 1. Territory which is not suitable for urbanization even though the city may be able to provide the area with some of the normal and customary city services. An exception to this item might be annexation for a special purpose, which should be stated. 2. Territory in which a large percentage of the land is occupied by buildings which would not meet present city standards, as such areas yield low tax returns and are costly to maintain. This item might be overlooked if there is a definite development plan which would required elimination of the substandard structures shortly after annexation. Also, this item would have to be overlooked if failure to annex such an area would cause it to become a county "island" within the City. NOT 3. Territory in which the owners areAwilling to allow their land to be assessed and taxed for its share of all city-wide, bonded indebtedness as they will be deriving benefits from the capital improvements thus provided. 4. Territory which, due to distance or other factors, would be too costly to provide with the customary city services such as sewer pains, street maintenance, and garbage and trash collection, unless very unusual benefits are involved. 5. Territory which might cause the city to reverse certain improvement policies unless the City is ready to have them reversed. An example is street improvement work which is paid out of general taxes such as curbing, gutters, sidewalks, street grading and surfacing. If an area which is generally lacking in such improvements is annexed, either the present policy of providing these improvements without special taxation would have to cease or the same privileges would have to be given to the newly annexed area also. This policy matter should be decided prior to annexation. It is recommended that each area provide its own improvements. The following are factors or situations which should receive serious considera- tion, but which are not necessarily in the category of the enumerated list aboves (a) Whether owners of an area about to be annexed should pay a certain sum per acre or per lot for the privilege does not appear to be a generally accepted practice and is not recommended here. However this matter might be based upon whether or not the cityle facilities in all branches, are presently built to care for only its present population and needs. If it has over-built its library, schools, water works, sewerage plant, city hall and offices, park areas, fire equipment, and trash and garbage collection facilities, then it is ready to serve a larger area and population without much additional outlay, and the new area might well be expected to pay its share of such equipment and service. On the other hand, if present use and existing facilities are balanced, the cost of enlarging facilities for the new area would appear to create no greater hardship for the enlarged city than was the providing of original facilities and service for original city. (b) In regard to practically undeveloped land, consideration should be given to likely uses of the area in future years. Guided future development may make the annexka�area a real benefit to the original city, particularly if the are is large enough to ultimately require a business center, or in a location particularly suited to manu- facturing or industrial development. (c) Special attention should be given to any area which is considered to be ideally located for a future shopping center. Such a center, close to the city, might develop and remain outside the city, thus furnishing no revenue to the city. This condition might tend to reduce future revenue to the city from the business- area therein be- cause of possible depreciating effects. This is mentioned because studies show that business districts in cities pay from about 25% to 35% of the city's ad valorem tax revenue. If such new business area were in the city, any possible ill effect on previous revenue sources would more than likely be off-set, if not superseded, by such new business area. (d) If the City were to annex State or Federally owned land for some unpredicted reason, it is suggested that a method for payments in. lieu of taxes be attempted in order to provide r"6m0bursement for any city service considered likely to be furnished. (e) In general it would appear logical to require that "an area to be annexed take steps to be released from special districts established to .provide services which the City intends to furnish to the area. Perhaps it is well to point out, in conclusion, that a list of criteria relative to annexation for use of a large city might be utterly different from the itmes pro- posed for a small city. Also, an annexation policy for one small city might ,be:-sur- prisingly unlike that of another small city whose situation and needs are quite different and whose citizens have created, attitudes or desires one way or the other in regard to the matter. (f) Under no circumstances should the City provide from its General Fund to pay for improvements in any inhabited area that requests annexation. I� { �. WV R.g13 TFO C�9 City of Huntington Beach California CppNTY Gp�, February 19, 1.�to 58 fXd Lemke 624 - Garden Grove Blvd. Garden Grove, California Dear Bud, The attached map as per your telephoAitscomp For your information the breakdown o1e basis for the original . City Lai ated and annexations in process to- , Old City L' is 4.68 square miles (This doeso,include our 9 sq. mil. of ocean within the City Limits) Forth No. 7.5 square miles East No. 1 6.5 square miles Forth No. 2 in pro SO 2.509 PP ►P Nortk o. 3 P .937 " PP NE PP .469 PP PP O. PP PP .04 ( PP Pi H4rber Ann ation :05 Total 22.692 PP PP Trust the above information will be of help to you. Estimated population of all areas approximately 10#081. Very truly yours, J. L. Henricksen, City Clerk JLH:sc ss I w r ,I o n6mwTa°r �Y'1rMrtr a ,,..-w � a Blank. Raw 00m, 00 a 04 Outti . prod 40* vt 41, Avoida m3 e UNION 4 N tows o 149 1443 ,3y SAO MAN W& 3�0*00 11 80= *0 h� i 1600010 Z &�� `" 0 1,50 044 4 � »,� ,... .. . ,,...: .' ft4wo t « *E�Q *00 on � 38*36 Vis �» Mooft « tag, 41 . Jr. , . ,416. `468 ta, Av « . ! . 7.0 s 2 #OQ dt jrf .r Ufta000 lA ,R Co ` ! �. �i-O 16 . . , �r2245 UA *26 ► . 11 # ► MUO La", . W04W 00*- 940 • # s t t � * s i t t s t • # s • s +r a ♦ ♦ • ♦ : • t t t t t t s ♦ # t t t • • t +r t .�+ t � � � � 31Pit H 4 � + TOM pal", !4rrNarwirw ,.wwr.+c M i.. rwawwt The Imo Vim►., or "lie v* t9 6065 00 22.17 . .�. a . 19 #� � s • ' U*380*00 2S.46 UA-090-7 130. P*ftsm of I � m * IlrAm 400.00. ....n�r�rw.Mh+www�rwa+r 4 (�/ y9 et 4 O_ /ie- NAV • ,., f B 0 9 T,�•�t��.. c�� �/�.� a�A�� S 3 to �,>� ,�. �-s's�to r_ Irk - _ e {j � to—- — _- _ :�^`• �-� t c� t�� , �` , � j +� �°�•-��tom- _`�- /�, 6 E � _ __-a_-.�.__�- R �� i 4 r r 110 AZ 0 A / .n ' IF._ c / o - 33, cCe �'d,� /m o - - ------ - ---- ------ ---- -------- - -- - 0 6 0— 119 00 __ ' -- - -- -- ---�0 �.- 6 a-' (� ) / t Ys 0 60 %'A 4-V— — 4--t Y-0— 3,z�o /e¢. 6 G -- ( , , J ° s " 3 " —-- -- - ------------------ on ., rg D tt C� /ram— o '7o® � /` p -- ----- -- t_—_r._�.r_ to ot IV 7- 4 — �• _., .�^.--- -- ,�-J-�f-�-o�-ate=-�'— —--�-----/-y�.—o�-n-o_._ —_�_�;�t"�,.- _- ------- ------ - - --- - 1. 7.b .3 U.0 U 1.1 4 0.00 6 7 0:0 0 1.0 5 0.0.0 460.00 1 5 0.00 3,0 4 0.00 6 0.00 1 2,4 4 0.00 34,080.00 1 3,2 4 0.00 28,670.00 9 1 0.00 3,700.00 1 0. 1 5 0.00 4 3 0.00 1 5 0.00 3,8 0 0.00 4,0 0 0.00 4,8 4 0.00 4,6 0 0.&0 4.0 1 0.00 1 0,8 2 0.00 1 8,3 0 0.00 5. 1 5 0.00 830.00 4,6 9 0.00 5.4 7 0.00 2 7.0 3 0.00 1 6.00 0.00 4 1 0.00 3 3 0.00 .230.00 6.6.6 0.00 7.92. 0.00 1 4.07 0.00 1.0 .4 0.0 .0 1 4.07 0.00 30.81, 0.00 2.8 1. 0.0 0 3 2.7 6 0.00 3 1.02 0.00 1 1.4 5 0.00 6.4 1 4.00 2 9.0 9 0.00 1 4.2 7 0.00 8,3 0 0.00 9.5 1 0.00 1 7,6 1 0.00 1 8.8 2 0.00 8,02 0.00 3.9 8 0.0 0 1 7.5 9 0.00 25,.950.00 6,7.8 0.00 3 9. 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 2 0 0.00 1 0 0.00 200.00 1 0 0.00 5,2 0 0.00 1.00 0.00 '5,5 7 0.00 7.5 0 0.00 2 1.9.4 0.00 8,4 7 0.00 3,7 8 0.00 26.400.00 1 6.0 3 0.00 .9,0 2 0.00 8.95 0.00 5 1.2. 3 0.00 4.2 9. 0.0 0 30,590.00 5,6 3 0.0. 0 1.1 9 0.00 2,9 4 0.0.0 1 0 0.00 1.0 0 0.00 4.4 7 0.00 - 35.280.00 7 0 � n n n • 1 7.0 2 0.0 0 .1 7.0 0 0.00 8.4 0 0.0 0, 1 5.9 .1 0.00 1 5.00 0.00 1.'0 0 0.0 0 1 4.9 5 0.00 880.00 7.00 0.00 8 5 ..0.0 0 1 4.0 6 0.00 94 0.0.0 8 5 0.00 1 3,1 5 0.0 0 780.00 65 0.00 3.820.00 8 3 0.00 7,8 7 0.00 4'5,8 1 0.00 7,8 5 0.00 . 29,.1 2 0.0 0 7.1. 9 0.00 1 1.4 0 0.00 3,8 8 0.00 1 1.3 8 0.00 1 1.7 2 0.00 64 0.00 3 7,1 3 0.00 1 4.8 5 0.00 4.2 0 0.00 5.5 5 0.00 3.0 8 0.0.-0 1 0.2 9 0.00 4.2 0 0.00 3.97 0.00 3,8 4 0.00 4.5 8.1 7 0.00 57,560.00 3 0 0.00 6.1 6 0.00 400.00 1 0.500.00 2 5,1 2 0.00 8 5 0.0 .0 2.6 2 0.00 1 . 1,3 8 0.00 3,300.00 1 1.6 4. 0.0 0 1 4,000.00 1 1.6 0 0.0.0. 6.6 5 0.0.0 1.2 3 0.00 3.0 8 0.00 8.7 4 0.00 1 1.3 8 0.00 3.4 0.00 1 3 0.00 1 2 0.00 400.00 6.42 0.00 1.6 3 0.00 340.00 4,0 0 0.00 4.4 8 0.00 3.5 2 0.00 1 0. 0.0 0 3.1 0 0.00 1.,167.254.00 2 5.0 0 2.5 0 3 8.5 0 2.5 0 2.5 0 3 8.5 0 5.00 ' 4.4 5 1 4.6 6' 4.8 8 2.2.2-0 119.09 1 .8.70 : 8 6.9 3 9.7 0 3:0.0 0 .9'.7 0 3 7.9:,2 3 8.20 2.4 4. 7 7.7 7 4 27 5" 1 0.00 1 9.6 3 1 0.00 2.4.7 1 1 0.00 2 6.5, O. 29.55 7 7.8 9 1 8.1 5 1 6 2,2.3 1 .5 0 28.50 1 .8'4 2 8.6 5. 8 .2.0 6 .2`.5 0 . 7.5 0 2 9.7 0 9.7 0 3 8.8 1 3 '8.52 3 8.2 7 2 2.1' 7 4.4' 1 1 1 .00 1 9.5 5 2 8.46 1 .00 2.00 2 0.7 2 3.5 5 1 .3 5 1 5.7 5 3.9 5 4.2 5 9.7 0 4,1. 7 1 .9 3 .5 0 1 .0 0 l 1 6.4 0 5 9.9 6 � 9-5 4 - _- 2.7 3 1 .5-,0 4.60 1 .4 7 1 7.3 4 .25 3 8.8 7 1 0 3.27 3 8.5 0 8 9.60 7.6 4 1 9.54 4 9.24 2.00 1 .00 2 3.6 6 1 8.3 6 1 8.3 6 3 0.6 5 2.00 5 4.08 6 6.5 3 1 9.6 3 1 .5 0 1 6.55 1 3.03 5 8.86 3 8.52 1 .86 2.7 3 1 .9 1 1 8.88 ! 2 4.7 1 3 9.09 2.50 3 9.09 8 1 .6 9 2 7.8 0 7 6.1 0 8 2.28 3 8.26 --- 2 3.27 7 7.1 7 3 8.68 1 8.4 8 2 9.6 6 3 8.68 3 6.5 5 1 9.6 8, 9.78 3 9.09 6 0.4 5 1 9.6 3 7.00 1 .25 4.90 I / 1 9.5 4 1 .8.6 6 5 7.7 4 3 8.50 8.22 6 8.6 7 3 8.1 8 2 2.5 5 2 2.3 8 116.45 1 .00 8" 3.3 0 1' 8.7 6 5,26 1 9.00 2.0 0 2.00 3 6.44 8 3.7 9 2 0.9 3 3 9.09 !� 4 0.00 2 0.00 3 8.5 0 3 8.5 0 2.5 0 4 0.00 i t 1 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLETION OF ANNEXATION STATE. OF CALIFORNIA ). COUNTY OF ® E PAUL C. JONES, being first duly sworna deposes and says: That he is now and at all times herein mentioned was the duly appointed, qualified and acting Clerk of the City- of Huntington Beach.' a Municipal corporation,, and ex-of ficio Clark of the City Council of said City, That pursuant to the .provisions. of the "Annexation of Uninhabited Territory Act. of 19390, and am ents thereof and. additions thereto, the City Council .did on the 23xO day of May, 1069, pass and adopt Resolution No. 1421 giving notice of the proposal to. annex certain uninhabited territory to the City of Huntington Beach, said territory being designated as PNOR AST: No', 2n 8, and said action being taken pursuant to a written petition,, therefore. That annexation proceedings wekd completed by said, City Council on the 18th day of Julye 1960$ by final adoption of its Ordinance No. 784, said Ordinance becoming effective thirty days thereafter. That by said proceedings. said City annexed the territory referred to in that certain certified copy of said Ordinance ioo 784 and a reap delineating said boundary, which Ordinance and Map, are annexed hereto and by this reference incor. porated herein. The boundary description of said annexed area .is set forth in Ordinance No. 784, That all requirements of the lags relating to such proceedings have been complied with. That on the lath day of -August., 1960, a certified copy of Ordinance No. 784 and a map of territory described therein designated as "NORTHEAST No. 2" was transmitted to the Secretary of State aand was received and fii.ed ,by the Secretary of State on Au$nas t 22nd a 1960.i ..` IN WITNESS WHEREOF,. I her -set hand and affix the Seal o f the City of Huntington ngtton Beach this 24th day of Auguste 1960, City 18rte �41e�enme fn ` THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH MAP ON FILE WITH CITY CLERK