HomeMy WebLinkAboutSunset Beach Annexation - General Information (8) ANT�'EXATION-:T IME' SCHEDULE
! t f
1 Pub 11sh _ a notice of Intention i 1
tc"A inex
? Pile a -copy of not ice an
.....
- At , , t
Affi'da -�'of_ P_�b2-7 •won with -.�" �• �'
tht '.-Cix . Clerk� i
City
r i i.. ea3s:toA .Y Y t f
l ,.ounci.i.- sg�rav �g _circulatio:r
of -a petition y ;
4. Peti fib A is` cbi ' tee ( t I
S. No ntltsr annexs .ot�s oT in-
_ corporations csa` take :Place
a. _ Petitiaa..is fiiard= rith'. the
City Catcil � t��►�Clerk E ► i , r
`7. Pst.1tiou is cba ed i ; carti i 1 : 4I
f - l
€ilid - - f •-
as tc nffi cY ; 1 -
Su is a ttl pe. ans filed ! # I
s=*tin
_ ca
- _ �� citeit
-wy ..;tom -' •Y�"_• -_- - - - _. ./--._ __ _. .. .__F. _._- -- �'- '-- --I ._ .j.. ��.
..r+ y�r a_ _•• 111 _ tt _ � `
Su�pplsseatia �' Sty -filed
. 4rdi�anct -�ss�si�► _.�i# _.- . ' , _ I I •
a ' COIL zci ` or er lot
lta�r�tion ! ( r�
mc
_. -•- �. - .. t I-- - � . � � � , �i " . � � sir 4
#
- .r
4
. •. _ . ; _:i.:---1'L-Je..r-. .. ,_. ..,- Wit' _ _ .. \r"••..a.'� •e_
,
_
_
-
' . . a• . •._r •.. .-.. - -.. is - - - S_
_.. i. ..<+a.0 — - .N .r._ ..., .. ..t. . ._. er .. -_ ✓.• w .. .J ....w}.... - A - ..• �.._.ate.., . ? '...Wbr.'Y•
- + •• --. r•7,.X'. -1... V -. -.-- . a_-::... ♦..- L. ... ..-f..: f.. f. _ . _ ._.d• - .tw" 'J- _ .. _.,r i_ .r.
ram..,.;.:- _nh.. r-:Y..'!.....if.ie _ _ .�... .n...ar.. ... ....-...• i.<Y...,... ,-. - ;-w.,., _,.. ,..:. s,,. .'Y'1._.. .._a.,.•.,.-w.we•5 ---- . . r__...f.,- <a._ _. `•, __:'t-'h1-. .a -.. a .. . _a. . .._i.r . .
r
49
SURESIDE COLONY LTD .
REPORT ON ANNEXATION
February, 1967
Maintaining the Surfside Colony as an unincorporated community Is becoming more
difficult. Fast and future local developments are forcing the Colony's Directors
to reevaluate its position of desiring to remain an unincorporated county community.
Our purpose in questioning our current status is not to change the Colony's character, ,
I
but quite to the contrary, we wish to insure the perpetuation of our p:resent.?,ocally
controlled private beach community status.
f _ g
There .s little question but that we must soon decide which one of our neighboring
cities to join; Huntington Reach or Seal Beach. Because of extreme pressure being
brought to bear on us by the City of Hunting ton• Beach, the Board of Directors felt
this whole question of annexation should be evaluated at this time while we are still
in a position to choose which city to join or continue to fight to rernain unincoipora-
zed. The question of forming a city of Sunset Reach-Surfside was investigated in
' great depth, and it appears that we cannot incorporate, mainly because the niinirimm
land area required for a new city is not available to us. The 'Colony's Board of
Directors has investigated, the mutual benefits which would result from -joining an
established city. Huntington Beach, with whom we have no particularly close ,
interests or ties, continues to aggressively take action ill an attempt to force
Surfside under their control. Thev parchased our water company in spite,of,an.
order frcm the Public'Utiiities Commission barring them from doing so •This has
been rt tested in court however, and it now appears a new
p , pp water district can br
y nee to protest every building var
formed. Ths conti nce applied for in`Surfside:
. the have established a fi e,station'I, Over the preterit of our local fire department T
Y at'
. y s t i'hthewater Com anY1R ozfice remises on Anderson Street. iiunkin da Biiacas,
,
never had a meeting with; ixr calked with the Surfeidu Boar"d of Directors about ottr
mutual robxems The continua to use all the fordes1hey can ather to put ,
1
Surfside under their control for which we assume are solely their own selfish
interests and not those of Surfside.
Surfeide has, over the years , enjoyed a close association with Seal Beach. eerier
to the Navy's 1944 cuudernnation, a significant sure of Surfeide lots were located
within that city. Even now, the turn around read at the Colony's west and is wit:zin
Seal Beach. Our children attend the two schools, many attend their churches , and
we use the nearby Seal Leach shopping centers. Should the Colony ,join Seal Beach,
we would be in Mr. Stanley Anderson's First Councilrnanic District which includes
the older ocean front Seal Beach district, an area which shares many common
problems with Surfside, like older buildings , beach erosion, Pacific Electric right
of way, and a limited transient population. The future Seal Deach develop-me nt of
the marina and beach on this southside or the Navy property will bring their city
sew-vices and utilities to the Colony's boundary,
When annexation is mentioned, many think this would affect our private community
status.. This is not true . Seal Beach has another private community within their
city limits , Leisure World. They are used to dealing with and understand the pro-
blems of a private community. Mayor Lloyd E . Gummero of Seal Beach is a
Leisure World resident and is sympathetic to our cause of desiring to maintain a
private community. It hair been affirmed that should we choose to join Seal Beach,
both parties would want, Surf side. to continue the functions of the Community Service
and Storm Water Protection Districts . This guarantees the Colony its indirect
income and assurea Seal Beach that they would not have to nay for periodic- beach
fills and maintenance. Any agreement with Seal Beach on annexation must be based
on mutual needs , We feel that the most significant Surfside needs requiring detailed .
rnutual agreement of conditions for annexation'aret
I . Private C:arzimunity Status
The Colony would ,continue to exist as a private l-e6 ch comm unity. Should the
!. fi
_• ! ,,.,.,.. .....>. .....s N ..;+ .;. � r � •1vWUWt .--`"..�i.N ..r.. ..na-..r:...._w.�..-
��ii i'� _. _. •In+ / ,Y, ) ,e ..:.f.:1�t. • .n. ' _ — —_ .:.,.,..wM1iF/ii�.t •r{fr.�1lM•fa;t'.'Y.11>
i
Colony negotiate a lease for the adjoining Pacific Electric right of way, that
property would be fenced off with the property becoming a leased part of the
private Su*rfuide community.
2 . Zoning
The present lot sizes are sub standard by the county's code definition. All new
construction requires a varisnce of some type . Hence all building within the
Colony is subject to the whim of the County Planning'Commission. We have
been told by the County that they are both unwilling and unable to a stablish a
special zone within the Colony to eliminate the necessity of requiring variancea
i
for reasonable construction,
Huntington Beach's position on variances and construction are well known. They
formally protest `all variances within the Colony ire their attempt to stop new con-
i
struction within Suriside.
i
Surfside would develop with Seal Beach, a detailed agreement on a special, but
reasonable R-1 -soning to allow building in a safe manner while realizing maximum
benefit of this very expensive property. This agreement would be along the follow-
ing line s:
A. 2 1/2 feet minimum side yards .
`
flimitation. Height limitation of 35 feet or three stories which ever is mo
st
restrictive .
C. Rear yards of 3 feet where residential properties abet. No'rear yard
ro uii ements on be,-..ch abutments .
butments .
D. All garage s'and first; living stories of itstructure are to be set back
2 1/2 feet: froin' 'the street line . No Bet backs required :;..
for 2nd and
3rd stories. '
S ,
z . Automobile ar`� ' g ages tbz two vehicles shall be a minimum of 19 foet. .-
outside widt va'n' 'd 20'feet in length,, or, two.off street parking spaces,
`3 1
one of which shall be covered for each single family dwelling.
F. Variance for all multiple family dwelling units (standard provisions)
except for 1 and 1/2 off street parking spaces for every dwelling unit.
Variance for Post Office , C-2 zoning for service station, restaurant,
and water distribution company and interim zone requiring a conditional
j
use pert-n.t on the Pacific Electric right of way.
G. The City will assist the Corporation In forming, if it so :esires , a
Water District without any City financtul assistance .
H. The City will agree to the removal of the County fire protection
structural tax. The City will provide police traffic enforcement in
the private streets upon request of the property owners as required by
law. City will agree to assist in securing clear title to the ld foot
strip as long as there is no cost to the City. The City will contract,
If requested by the Corporation, for the maintenance of private beach
area, street sweert-,1,„ :,ninting and repair of privately owned streets
at whatever is the City's cost. It is understood that the Storm Water
Protraction District, Sanitation. District, and Community Service
District will continue in existence and that the streets will rernain
private streets ane. the beach a private beach . The City* will provide
life guard service equal to that pruvidcd by the County.
3 . Wate r
The Colony's ultimate desire is to continue receiving soft water from the
Svrfgide Sunset Beach Water Company. The question o: possible ownership and
future control is now a subject to the execution of an agreement between
Huntington Beach, Sunset Beach, and Surfside Colony. Should this work oui as
p to receive our � ,
planned we.would continue. ,,c ', 'od soft wellwater. Also; continua-
tion of the- proposed Seal Beech transmission main to the 'nrw Aquatic Park would
, a e y B ,� pry , ice in case of
G
xtefided to the Surf �Colbn boundary to give back u neiv
well,failure
r '
4. Streets
All present and future streets within the Colony would continue to be corstruct6LI
and maintained by Surfside unless Surfside decided to contract for maintenance
from the City for which they would pay the City a maintenance fee .
5 . Sewers
The area would continue to be served by the local sanitary district, at least until
i
such time as either (a) a main trunk line is constructed through the area to the
county sanitation district facilities near Fountain Valley, or (b) a force main
is constructed from the area (including Aquatic Park) to the City's facilities.
6 . Lifeguard Services
Although the ueach to the mean high tide line is Colony property, there currcfitly
Is a strip between the mean high tide lin.) and the actual water line which is
publicly owned. In addition there exists the City owned, public beach between
the Navy property and Surfside. The puhlir aroas are p�.troIled by a county.
lifeguard during the summer, and this would become a City responsibility if
• j
the area is annexed.
7. Fire Protection
Current services are from the county volunteer station in Sunset Peach. Fire.
j protec,ion from the City would come fro n the downtown station and the station
on Bay B.►ulevard. Seal Beach is curruntlV purchasing in'exces's of 120to00
of fire,fighting equipment and beg-inning
e -inninB a stron8,Pro rarn 'of employing full-
time professiona) fire fighters. ,
_
I
The Cityis currently graded as a 6A and Surf sid . Cclon a y g • a� y is; a 9R . We .coeld .
reasonably anticipate ,a reorading of tits area within the lorseeable future and
`t.
more favorable fire insurance rates 1f:She zrea' aMnc�xes to Seale- Beach,
8 . Police hrotocti&i
With an estimn' ted papiaation'`saf 400' or less , and with pri�tato streets, the, City
would not contemplate any additional police personnel, but would handle calls
with present forces . This would still be a substantial increase in police service_ j
over present services . Currently, one sheriff car serves Sunset Beach
Surfside , Rossinoor, Midway City, and other areas. With the development of
the Aquatic Park, additional pclice supervision will undoubtedly be necessary
I
In that area. As the streets are privately owned, the only traffic citation that
can currently be issued is for drunken driving , The City would not be
M M '
responsible for traffic enforcement unless Su.fside petitioned for such services
P P
to protect us from illegal parking, speeding, and other similar offenses .
9. Storrn Water District
The present Surfside Storm Water Protection District would be continued to
hat -dle the periodic beach fills and bulkhead maintenance . Hence this Surfside
problem would not be a tax bur,len on Seal Beach.
10 . Beach Maintenance
Surfside could contract with the City to clean and maintain all the beach from j
waters edge upland to the beach front lots , if it so desires.
11 . Clearing Titles
The land bounding both the ocean and upland side of the privately held beach front
lots is held by Surfside Colony Ltd. Unfortunately, the Colony'a, property title
allows for ingress and egress by any stockholder at any tirne on these parcels . j
Our recently completed survey indicates that In some sec+ions the upland street
er;croaches on the privately held lots , the houses in turn are displac.dd an equal
amount onto the Colony's ocean front strip: thou! exception, the stockholders
desire to swap equal areas of street property for equivalent beach area`so the title
and h
would indicate the true location of the lots houses . The Board'ot Directors
ic.einvowered to swap land'to correct this condition. Unfortunately, 6#en'aftex
a,Superior Cvurt order which gave Ito' consents and disclah"' er for the relief we
sought as the plantiff to remove this cloud on the title, the titIv Ansurance
companies will not honor this and issue policies of Title Insurance . .As some
properties are held in estates, trusts; 'or in process of sale, it's an impossible
task to get all stockholders to simultaneously•sign for relief from this rebrric-
tion. The City has promised to help Surfside with this problem , although there
is no immediate solution at hand.
12 . Taxes and Fire Insurance Cost.
We have collected the following information concerning taxes , revenue, and fire'
insurance costs . Assume that all properties to the ocean side of Highway 1. and
extending from Seal Beach on the North West to the centerline of Anderson Street
to the South East would be ant,excd to Seal Beach.
A. Revenue to Seal Beach
Preliminary data concerning assessed valuation at this time indicates
a total assessment of approximately $1 ,200,000 at a tax rate of
$1 . 35/hundred would yield the city $16, 200/year and according to
Seal Beach state subventions would approximate $5, 000/year. Other
fees , i.e . , building pert-nits would generally be offset by costs .
B. City Conts
Beach erosion problems are handled by our own district, and would .not
be on the general city tax rate . Lifeguard coats: one man, 9 hours
par day, for four rn. onths would cost about $3, 400 for the City. Should
they ap ly the present field strength of the police departrncnt per .1 ,004
population this would be equivalent to one police car spending 1/3 time
in this area day and night . They would allocate, a police cnstof about
$5, 000. Beach maintenance and clean work would cost the City approxi
mately $4 ,000 per year. it would appear that out-of-pocket costs to
the City therefore , would be: apprbXima,cly $12 ,400 .
C. Costs to Surf side Taxpayers
The following table, shower tha estimated cost effect on Sur! lde property
owners of annexation. The City tax rate of $ 1_.35 for .deal Beach or
1
T t
$ 1 .33 for Huntington Beach would be added to the basic rates which are j
lower than Surfside for Seal Beach and higher than Surfside for
Huntington Beach. Annexation to Seal Beach would result in lower`
costs to the Colony for beach maintenance , legal fees and fire Pro-
tection. Annexation to Huntington Beach would result in lower beach
maintenancv costs , lower fire prot.ction costs, and ! igher legr.l fees . -
'rhe estimated tax rates would be $13.0086 with Huntington Be.ich,
$11 .4511 with Seal Beach as opposed to $104399 for this year in
.Surfside . The decreased fire insurance -rato•; occasioned by annexation
would reduce the equivalent rates to $10 ,9731 with Seal Beach and`
$12 .5 306 with Huntington Beach which is $1 .60 higher for K :'ipgton
Beach and about 3- 1/3� higher with Seal Beach.
l Surfside Taxes - Esti=r.ate as Part Esti6ate' .as Part
Unincorporated �of Seal -Beach of HuntingtonBch.
mope r ty Taxes
• r
'I
Basic Rate 7 . 3407 7.2763 8 .4038
City Fund Rate -0- 1.3500 1 .3300
Surfside Community 1 .0000 1 .0000 1.0000
Service District
Surfside Strrn Wtr 2.5992 R.5992 2•5992 ,y
Protection District
Estimated Savings
RkLsult of Annaxation
Bench Maintenance - .4600 .4600
Legal Expenses ' 2000
Fire Protection :0644 .0644
;a.
Tax Total 10,49399 11 .4511 13 .0086
Fire Insurance 'Rate
Reduction FquivaI'tt1) .4780 -:4760 j
Cost Total 10
. .
9399 12 .530ti
Not Increase -d- ' 0332 1;5907
(!,,Based on $151,'000 policies for 177h6tne8 ,
- -- - - r • r rsrnt�ialtFatt�[11�
For z hou:sc assess16 at $4,000 this increased rate of .0332 would incirease the .axes.`'
by $1 .32 annually with Sea1Beach.
13. Seal Beach Reasons for Considering PnnexatLon
Seal Beach's reasons for considering annexation are the following:
The basic reason in their estimation. is the potential of the area. V land prices
have not reached $10 per square foot, they feet that they would do so in 'time
The price of land will demand that Surfside be a high-value residential community.
The costs of services in this type of community are often miniir.al in comparison
to other areas . The people in the Colony are attempting �.o improve the area
and are undertaking the leasing of the adjacent Southern Pacific right of way for
parking and beautification, solving, to a major extent, o-,:i of the more: pressing
problems improving s and im rovin the area.
'i
i
It appears to the %ity Manager that the annexation need not be an immediate cost
to the City; that revenue s in gene ral wculd cover out-of-pocket costs . In the
long run, the value of the property will cause exceptionally nice housing to take
I
the place of L,I.ase dwellings classified as: poor or very poor.
The area is adjacent to the .Aquatic Park and city services rendered in the park
area �ould be reasonably- extended to the Surf side Colony. The City is probably
the only agency that would be responsive to the Colony's request for zoning com-
patible with its wishes . The City is also one of the two agencies that ca.n as-gist. '
in solving future sewage and possible water needs .
We h'Ave tried to present a comprehensive and factual analysis of the current
annexation situation. We would like to discuss this and answer any questions at the
npecial-meeting that h&s be-em called. `
Surfsido Colony Ltd.
Board of Directors
K.C. .Cleve land,Jr* ' PrQa ident "
Al MAO,wiea; Nice' President
award C Sukla�,�'Secr E. . et:zry/:Treasures
Hal V. Claaunccy, Dire'cto:
J oseph L. Kray,' Director
�•«7..: .. t~I�f :"tti 'i( ;., ... u„ ..,:�It�l.Z1d} t:FL2[.ttr.r....•.��...._.�..r�.�..a�.+.�_. ... T.-".•�,,.. . ' : :�.
f . �l• ��- � 1,
LOCAL AQVICY FORMATION COMMIS"ICIN
MEMORANDUM
Larch 29, 1967
TO: City of Huntington Peach
Attention : Paul C. Jones, City Clerk
FROM: Richard T. Turner, Executive :officer
RE : PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SEAL BEACH ;
Annexation 67-1
Pursuant to its Bylaw No. 33, , the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Orange County requests you-r. report on , the }
advi %•ability, An terms of the general publl interest re-
garding the factors named in Government Code Section, y
54?96 as they ,relate to the special concern of your agency.
Copies of the "Justification of Proposal,," , map and descrip-
tion are attached.
This proposal will be Bet fur hearing before this Commieai n,
May 10, 1967 * :. er• P
r 4-4am, The report should be delivered to the secretary
of the Commission, County Administration BuildinE,, 515 `north
Sycamore Street, Room 501, Santa Ana.
if you feel the importance of vhe proposal from the ;"oi'nt- of
view of you: agency makes it advisable to cotitinue the hearing '
to a later date in order to allow time 'for further study,
please furn..:sr an interim report so indicating, b v to containing -
your � tentative advice on the proposal.
Richard . T. Turner
Executive Officer
would a ..
,
` iate recoil vs' your report by Apr31. 2Ei, ig67
We reo .
c + s
■+ 1�.. .!• r . ., +. +.. .T- ` .:1 1 a . { i t f eft l�tlf .�F+ , ,. -�• t1Y) '
t + l
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
TO: LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION C=41SSION
FIFTH FLOOR - ROOM 503
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
515 NORTH SYCAMORE STREET
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
NAILING ADDRESS :
P. 0. ,BOX 838
,SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
FROM: City of Seal Beach
California
SUBJECT: JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL r
TITLE OF PRGPOSAI, Annexation 67-1
I
A. GENERAL
1 . TYPE AND DESIGNATION OF PROPOSAL: Annexation of
j inhabited territory to thy: City of Seal Beach.
2. STATUTORY PROVISIONS GUVERNING PROCEEDINGS :
Amnexation Act of 191.3-inhabited territory
3. THE REASONS KC R THIS PROPOSAL ARE AS FOLLOWS :
Request by property owners and voters within area
proposed to be annexed.
f-, t i
�Irr , 5 41•, liYf4� .it' +• ' ' "t` .r... ,jt., .,.-.. .,. 1
.,i +..+... sic . . .i•rr w+w.).nr4� .t'y,{•o�. �t:47*►.v....�1-
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
B. PHYSICAL FEATURL5
1. LAND AREA : S(tUARE MILES .07 ; ACRES 44
2 . STATE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TOPOGRAPHY:Portion of area
south of Pacific Coast Highway is generally flat, beach area
I
adjacent to Pacific Ocean; area north of Pacific Coast
Highway is marsh tidal land.
3, DESCRIBE "NATURAL" BOU11DARIES : (RIVERS , MOUNTAINS,
FREEWAYS , ETC. )
The proposed annexation is bounded on the souta by the
Pacific Ocean. A ,portion of the northern bow.idary is
the Pacific Coast Highway.
4, DESCRIBE DRAINAGE BASINS, RIVERS, FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL,
Eric
I
^he area. north of Pacific Coast Highway is a marsh tidal area
djacent to a water way connecting Anaheim Landing and the.
p .oposeda uatic' park. The area south of Pacific Coast
Highway drains generally to the adjacent Pacific Ocean.
5 . DESCRIBE MAJOR HIGHWAY ACCESS TO THE AREA :
The 2roposed annexation is served primarily by the Pacific
Coast Hi. Aiwa California 1
C . POPULATION AND RELATED MATTERS .
1. POPULATION IN SUBJECT AREA :
`.-.,proximately 375
POPULATION DENSITY (I.E. PER SQUARE MILES, PER ACRE. )
' The density of the r si.dex� ,ia area only is ap2roximatelY
46 per gore; the density of the entire annexation land
area is apQroximately 8 5 -per acres
2.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
3. NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS : Approximately 107
4. NUMBER OF DIIELLING UNITS : 176
5. PROXIMIT'Ll :!`0 OTHER POPULATED AREAS :Sunset Beach an
uniaco _ nrat:ed area of a • roxims tel 1 100 is adjacent to
Uie ease; portions or me. ClEy ot Huntington beach are adjacent
to the north east, the City of Seal Reach is adjacent to the
west.
6. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN POPULATION IN
NEXT 10 YEARS ;As the area will be zoned R-1 and is of high
i
density for that zoning classification, it is not likely that
there will be any significant increase in population in the
next 10 years . l
7. LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN ADJACENT AREAS
IN NEXT 10 FEARS :
A. IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS :Small gradual increase, in
population may take place in the Sunset Beach area depending ;I
un2n future land use plans as they may be _ap roved by the
goveB. Na NCORFORATED AREAS : y
The tit of Seal Beach
nroiecrions are for a population of 45,000 by 1985 within
present corporate boundaries .
I
D. ECONOMIC FACTORS ]
1 . ZONING AND RELATED MATTERS : !
A. DESCRIBE THE EXISTING LAND USE IN THE AREA WHICH
IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS PROPOSAL.Approximately , 5 acres are
devoted to come ercial Uses ; there is apprcoximatei.y 23. acres, of
beach area much of which `is privately owned;- approximately 82
l
acres' is devoted to Y-eaaden'Uh.1 uses ; the remaining '-acrea a is
in ,: greets, vacant or undeveloped land.
3. :
. f
1s
-
i
I
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
B. DETAIL EXISTING ZONING: The residtntiAl area is
zoned R-r4, the commercial area is zoned C-2.
C . DESCRIBE PROPOSED NEW ZONING OR CHANGES IN ZONING,
IF ANY:
It is planned that the residemtihl area will be zoned
the commercial area. C-2, the raiLro&d right of way placed
in an interim zone, and the remaining beach or tidal property
to be unzoned.
2. ASSESSED VALUE aN AREA:
A. LAND: 793 , 340
B. IMPROVEMENTS : 1952560
Total - 9682900
C. AMOUNT OF PUBLICLY OWNLL LAND IN AREA : 7 acres
exclusive of beach and streets .
I'I ,
.�. AMOUNT OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA : Not in excess
w
Of �11000e
E. GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES IN AREA {DESCRIBE IN SUCH DETAIL
AS IS APPROPRIATE TO THE AREA THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTAL
SERVICES AND CONTROLS IN THE AREA INCLUDING, FOR EXAMPLE,
POLICE PROTECTION, FIRE PROTECTION) REALTH SERVICES,
GARBAGE AND TRASH COLLECTION, LIBRARIES, PARKS AND PLAY-
GROUNDS, SEWERS, STREETS, STREET LIGHTING, ETC. )
See attached page 4a.
4
i
�. Governmental Services In Area
Police Protection: County Sheriff supplemeni:ei by private
patrol.
Fire Protection: County Fire Department, volunte'nr station
in Sunset Beach.
j RefAise Collection: Sunset Sanitary District provides for j
this service.
Streets : Streets within the colony are owned and maintained
as private streets ; Pacific Coast Highway is a state highway.
He.zlt',. Service : Orange County Health Department,
Library: Orange County Library branch in Seal Beach.
Sewers and Sewage 'treatment: Sunset Sanitary District.
General Government : Orange County.
Surfside Storm Water Protection District : Beach erosion and,
maintenance.
Surfside Community Service District : Legal services, entrance
gate, etc.
t
4a.
..•.. • ..... s. ... ...... • .... ..... .. •..-,. Ir if.. .. .•w� ..r1".. ........r......r.'yWf .A•: ":hf`_. .!!M,h(JYMS•U•M•�.•••"7Yc"+.t+ J - ..•.. .•.w+ - —
USTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
F. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS :
1. DESCRIBE THOSE GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS WHICH
SHOULD BE PROVIDED WHICH ARE NOW 140T PROVIDED OR WHICH
SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN INCREASED AMOUNT IN THE AREA.
See page 5Atand 5B.
2. ESTIMATE PROBABLE FUTURE NEED FOR NEW OR INCREASED
GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES OR CONTROLS IN THE AREA.
1� is- ari .icipa.t e-d that the propDaed service levels. comnarbl-e
to those provided other areas of the city, would be sufficient:.
in the foreseeable future considering the development of the
area as an R-1 zoned territory.
3 . DESCRIBE HOW YOUR PROPOSAL MEETS THE NEED WHICH YOU
HAVE DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS F, 1 and 2 ABOVE.
In outlining the needs in Paragraphs F 1 and 2 above,the
proposed method of meeting the needs are also outlined,
4. WHAT ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION EXIST FOP. MEETING
THE NEED DESCRIBED ABOVE? DESCRIBE AND EVALUATE:
See page 5C.
G. WHAT REVE14UE WILL YOUR PROPOSAL REQUIRE FOR THE ACCOMPLISH- r
MENT OF ITS GOALS AND 14Ht?T ARE THE PROSPECTIVE SOURCES OF '
SUCH REVENUE?
Seepage 5D.
Y:
50
�. Need for Additional Governmental Services and Controls :
General Government : The City of Seal Beach is a chartered
city with a five member City Council elected for four year
overlapping terms by districts and a council-manager form
of government. The 5 member planning commission is appointed
for four year overlapping terns by the City Council. The
City Hall is less than two road miles from the proposed
annexation, thereby being considerably more convenient for
residents of the area in handling of local goverrunental
matters affecting their area. Many of the problems of the
area, particularly in the field of zoning, are similar to
those of areas currently in the City and therefore could
receive localized attention.
f
As the proposed annexation area is immediately adjacent to
I
the city any development, growth and/or lack of development
will affect, to some extent, the remaining portions of the
city, particularly any developments that will occur within
::he city (or the city's sphere of influence) in the south-
easterly area of the city.
It is contended that the representation provided by a city
government would be more responsive to 'Local needs and Lhat
a combination of city representative and county supervisor .al
representation would be beneficial to the area proposed to be
annexed.
Pr .ice protection : Presently police protection is provided
beach areas -end streets adjacent to the proposed
annexation. The size of the area and population would not
seemly impose an undue burden on the present police strength.
As most of the beach area is :private property and restricted
by the layout of the residential area from extensive use by
,-.he general public, it is not anticipated that beach crowds '
present a problem.
By having a police station within two miles , an adequately
manned department including sufficient patrol strength, the
amount of patrol time devoted to the area v-1.11 uridoubteJly
be increased and thereby enable the colony too either dispense
with or reduce the use of private patrol services.
5a.
Need for Additional Governmental Services and Controls (coat'd)
Police Protection (cont' d)
The city will also enforce traffic regulations within the
colony on the private streets, in accordance with the S•Cate
Vehicle Code, and thereby offer a partial solution to the
area parking problems .
Fire Protection: The area is currently classified ao 9 B
by the Pacific Fire Rating Bureau for insurance purposes.
This is a very undesirable rating and indicates a reed for
increased fire protection and fire defense services.
Present services are provided by a volunteer fire fighting
force.
The City of Seal Beach has on order an aerial platform
(snorkle) truck and an additional 1,500 gpm pumper,
which together with the cicy' s three 1,000 gpm pumpers
and other equipment, provides considerable flexibility
in fire fighting apparatus .
The City has initiated a program of staffing fire stations
with full time professional fire fighting personnel. It is
anticipated that the company which will be the "First in"
for the proposed annexation area will be staffed with full
time personnel within approximately 1k years and will he the ,
third full time f::re fighting company. "Second ins' response
would be provided by a company with full time personnel. 4
The proposed annexation area is N-rithin two miles running t
distance of the first response fire company as recommended
by the American Insurance Association (National Board of
Fire Underwriters) for residentail areas .
There is little doubt therefore that the present fire
fighting capabilities will be somewhat improved currently
and that over the succeeding years , the service will improve
s,:Lbstantially.
Park and Recreation : The area' s basic recreation area is the
beach €rc::::, both private and publically owned. The city would
be responsible for lifeguard service in the publically. owned
areas and would staff the area, with personnel during the summer
and provide roving checks during 'the winter 'season. This {{
. 1
follows the basic pattern of current services.
5h.
Y 1
F. What alternative courses of action exist for messing the
need described above:
1. Alternative ; The area proposed to be annexed to
Seal Beach might be annexed to another city. 1'
Evaluation: The proponents have not indicated a desire t
or willingness to be annexed to their other neighboring
city. The proposed annexation area is within the Seal
Beech Elementary School District and the residents of
the area tend -o do much of the shopping in Seal Beach.
A portion of the area is bounded on the north by Seal
Beach and annexation to another city could present
boundary difficulties.
2. Alternative : Incorporation.
Evaluation : Completely insufficient tax base even when
combined with other nearby unincorporated areas.
3. Alternative : Remain an unincorporated terrtitory.
Evaluation. The proponents contend that governmental
services would be enhanced by a local government with
the representation of a locally elected council. Zoning;
problems could receive consideration by an agency faced
with similar problems in adjacent areas. By consolidating
work forces with the city the cost to the Colony for
street and beach maintenance could be reduced. The
residents of eba area appear to recognize teat there is
a need for municipal type services and desire to have an
opportunity to determine the city of Lheir ct-uiee. It is
recognized that in arriving at solutions to sewer treatment
and water service problems, the assistance of a municipality' s
staff would be helpful even though the financial problems
are handled by the annexation area.
Sc.
i
f
1 ;
G. What Revenue Will Your Froposal Require For The Accomplishment
Of Its Goals And What. Are The Prespective Saurces Of. Such
Revenue : .
It is estimated that the city would receive the fallowing
annual revenues ;
1. Property Taxes $123620
2. Motor Vehicle In Lieu
and Gas Taxes 4,170
j 3. Sales Tax 5D0
44. Business Licenses 75
Pots? $17 92 0
It is estimated that the city would expend the following -
amounts annually:
1. Lifeguard Service $ 39400
2. police (proration of costs ) 5 ,000
3. Bes,:h Clean Up and
Operational Maintenance 53000
4. General Government 3,000
Total. $163,050
a ed a
It i s nticzpat that charges for building permits and
similar items would be offset by city expenditures .
Beach erosion costs and problems would continue to be
handled by the Surfaide Storm Water Protection District .
t
'l
5d .
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
f
r H. ESTIMATE TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY THE EFFECT Or THE
PROPOSAL ON:
I. , COST OF GOVERNh7,IJTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS See Item G
for outline of major costs of required additional overn•-
mentLl services and controls .
2. ADEQUACY OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS.-The
annexation would enable the area to receive additional fire
and police services which cannat -be pray-Ida etLr_ ren�.�an—
unincorporated territory without the creation df expensive
li L
Fs ecial service districts . The annexation wo�Ald�lro _re,�,,y,1.t
n representation at t zT a local governmental level. .
3. MUTUAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS . The Rroposed�
annexation area is within the Seal Beach EN entary School
District; the aroa utilizes the county, brangh 1_ibragy in the
j City of Seal Beach. Seal Beach also provides the closest
shopping and b t u_,i n s s c e n tni;..-t to n annex
Surfside and the Cicy of Seal Beach are concerned with the
` pt-
4. LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTY.
See Wage 6A
I• ThE NATURE OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR
REORGANIZATION AND THE NAME OR NAMES OF ALL DISTRICTS AND/ -
OR CITIES FOR WHICH THE CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGAN-
IZATION IS PROPOSED ARE AS FOLLOWS :
The County Structural Fire Protection District is the only
service organization and/or special taxing district which
will be eleminated
64
H. Local. Governmental Structure of the County.
The proposed annexation area is a part of Super�risori.al
District Nwnber 2 and the following spacial taxing districts :
Country Library
County Flood Control
County Harbor District -
County Mosquito Abatement District
County Structural Fire Protection
Orange County M.W.D.
M.W.D*
Huntington Beach High School
Seal Beach Elementary School
Orange Coast Junior College
Sunset: Sanitar•-f District
Surfside Colony Community Service District
Surf side Colony Storm Wa::er Pro tec;:ion Ms tric t:
s l
ba.
1
��,j�i:.d� f'v ' Yr w����x����r,�,u�xt��«:e1n �r,Mrr.,w+v-.A .» ,.,..«... .«- = � ,!`•`nr�`t1i'i�� d','i<.jltli���f�,r'i f�;�i"�';; r.�±�"lx:1C�� ly�; "�
,„.:,t., tr }�ss�J� ,,, , . ,. . ,r_. ,. t_ t r _ .. .•r'+.r(�F�'`,�`:+`c+t�+;:VabT���i�N..
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
J. THE NAMES OF ALL OTNTR AFFECTED COUNTIES, CITIES AND
DISTRICTS ARE AS FOLLOWS :
None
I ,
K. ANY OTHER COMMENT MIGH YOU WISH TO MAKE
See page 7a.
I
i
I�
L. TO BE COMPM-TED FOR FORMATION PROPOSALS ONLY
1. SERVICES AND MAJOR PROJECTS TO BE PROVIDED BY
PROPOSED AGENCY IN FIRST AND SECOND YEAR OF OPERATION :
2. ,PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY'S
EXISTENCE. ATITACH PROPOSED BUDGET SHEETS AS EXHIBIT
"D'r TO PROPOSED REQUEST.
3. ESTIMATED TAX RATE FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY'S
EXISTENCE. ATTACH TALC RATE PROPOSALS AS EXHIBIT "C" TO r'
PROPOSED REQUEST.
4. ALTERNATES TO PROVIDING SERVICES OTHER THAN BY
INCORPORATION OR FORMATION
,
K. Any other Comments Whici, Yot c Wish To Make :
The proponents as residents of Surfside Colony des`i.re to
have the area annexed to the City of Seal Beach. The area
may not be of immediate direct economic benefit to the City
and may even result in a deficit for a period of time. However,
over the long run, as the area develops more modern housing
(which appears to be very likely because of current land prices)
the annexation, of the Surfsi.de Colony avea would result in an
advantageous one to the City.
i `1
The proponents are willing to provide solutions to many of
their area problems including off-street parking anti clearing
title to property held "in common, " but may need the staff
assistance of a municipality to achieve the solutions. They
are also willing to continue the financial stipport of correcting
the beach erosion problem and thereby not to impose the problem
on the City in general. In order to upgrade their community
it is their belief, however, that it can, be accomplished easier
and faster by working with a municipality.
The colony is also desirous of maintaining its private, walled-in
community. The City of ;'eal Beach has had experience with this
type of community within the City (Leisure World. •• Seal Beach) .
i
It is requested that the proposed annexation be approved as
submitted.
7a.
JUSTIFICATION UP PROPOSAL
M ' SUBMIT, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION vl{ICIl MAY . BE OF VALUE.,
TO'
TEE COMMISSION IN REACHING THEIR DECISION ON SEAPARATE
SHEETS.
N. NOTICES AND COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED CHANGE
SHALL BE DIRECTED TO THE FOLLOWING (3 MAXIMUM)
NAME Lee Risner, City Manager 'rEuPFiONE 431 2527
A"JDRESS City Hall CITY Seal Beach, Calif. 90740
NAME. Philip Bettencourt TELEPHONE 431 2527
ADDRESS City Hall CITY: Seal Beach Calif, 90740
NAME TELEPHONE
ADDRESS CITY
i
1
t
r
. ,'• :1, _
r
_
,
..JJ
F
r 1,
I
r
1
I
TITLE INSURANCC AND TRUST
i
AT1COR COMPANY
i
` t
Jam•'- �Y ,3
OnAll COUNTY OFFICE T
i <
900 orttt Ma{ St. Santa Ana 92702 0 547.3333 Ztnfth 2345
► P LICATION DATA Sf-{U
.r
COLRITY OF ORANGE
UXAL AGENCY FORMATION C(MISSION
5B NORTH sYcwm STREET, ROOM 101
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701
Proposals subject to Local Agency Formation Commission review and approval cannot
be initiated until applicetion is made to , and accepted for filing by the Executive
Officer. Each application must contain substantially the :ollowing:
`. 1 . Justification of Proposal
2, Map and Legal (metes & bounds) Description
Map:
Professionally drawn blackline map depicting the boundaries of the
proposal , and such information as the title of the proposal , acreage,
bearings and distances , north arrow, scale, point of beginning, location
map, etc. Map size shall be on Will x 14" when possible. A reproducible
snap on sepia, vellum, etc. , is required for anything larger.
Legal Nscri,2ticn:
Description shall be typed on 8�" x 11 " or 8h" x 14" paper so that
xerox copies can be produced from the same . Identification of
proposal must not conflict with that inscribed on map.
3. Applicable fee
4. Initial Study
Pursuant ;to the provisions of the California Environmental quality
i Act of 1970, the Initial Study form is designed to assist Oe
Executive Officer in determining environmental impacts , if any,
relative to a proposal filed with the LAFC. If an Environmental
Document (EIR or 'Negative Declaration) prepared in connection with
i an earlier project is applicable to the activity underlying the
proposal then that docuirent shall be submitted in lieu of the
Initial Study form.
Al
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
COUNTY OF ORANGE
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING -
5:15 NORTH SYCAMORE STREET, ROOM 101
SANTA ANA, CALIFORKIA 92701
IN ORDER TO FACILITATE THE COMMISSION S REVIEW OF THE FACTORS SET FORTH '
IN GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54790" YOU ARE REQUIRED, PURSUANT TO BYLA14 NO
31, TO COMPLETE THE FOLL014I NG QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY
r
a
i
i
E
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
1'I TLC OF PROPOSAL
APPL I CANT
NAME
ADDRESS _ ZIP CODE
TELEPHONE NUMBER ; AREA CODE t }
A GENERAL
I . TYPE AND DESIGNATION OF PROPOSAL :
Z, STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS ; j
1
REASONS FOR THE PROPOSAL: (BE SPECIFIC) 1
,
` ^+ lyl+tLilYf'*t+
4 , JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
, j
I . f�1UMf;ER 0-F DWELLING UNITS :
�. PROX I141T Y TO OTHER POPULATED ARC-AS:
6 LIKELIHOOD OF S I GNI F I CANT INCREASE IN POPULATION IN THE NEXT 10
YEARS :
,
� LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN ADJACENT AREAS I14 THE NEXT
10 YEARS
'A , IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS ;
I
B, IN INCORPORATED AREAS ;
D, ECOI-10141C FACTORS
I PLANNING, ZONING AND RELATED MATTERS
A . DESCRIBE THE EXISTING L{AND USE IN THE AREA WH I CH ' I S THE SUBJECT
OF THE PROPOSAL; (BE SPECIFIC)
B, DETAIL EXISTING ZONING:
a ;
JUS-I'I F I CATI ON OF PROPOSAL
34 ASSESSED VALUATION IN ARE
ASSESSED:�� A
A LAND: _.._.__ ___._.__...� __._ .... ......._._..�.._._
B It-1PROVEMENTS
C /V40UNT OF PUBLICLY OWNED LAND IN THE AREA► ;
4 , AMOUNT OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA :
1
6 .
El GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES IN AREA : (DESCRIBE 1N SUCH DETAIL AS IS APPRO—
PRIATE TO THE AREA THE EXISTING GOVERNIMIENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS IN
THE AREA INCLUDINC, FOR EXAMPLE, POLICE PROTECTION, FIkE PROTECTION,
HEALTH SERVICES, GARBAGE & TRASH COLLI=CTION, LIBRARIES, PARKS $ kECRE•-
` 7lTIPM SERVICES, SEWERS, S'f ROE T PIAI NTENANCE, STREET LI GH'fI VG, ETC , )
r -
To
i
{
i
�';. ,. "... ":;:K'1 7 .,, 1,§:x'C!!^ay-M.V'fiM YMt!I `U-s• ... .n . ,.. ♦,a iR.vr1..Y1. �..�7R1�1\ - _- —__ . ._.._.,.. ..�-�-�--_.-...__.
JUSTIFICATION OF ..PROPOSAL
ASSESSED VALUATION IN AREA
B . Ih1PROVEMENTS :
co AMOUNT OF PUBI.1 CLV 01114ED LAND IN THE AREA :
AMOUNT OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREA :
I
f ,
E GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES IN AREA : (DESCRIBE IN SUCH DETAIL AS IS APPRO-
PRIATE TO T14E AREA THE EXISTING GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS IN
THE AREA INCLUDING, FOR EXAMPLE, POLICE PROTECTION, FIRE PROTECTION,
HEALTH SERVICES, GARBAGE $ TRASH COLLECTION, LIBRARIES, PARKS ` R RECRE-
ATION SERVICES, SEWER , STREET MAINTENANCE, STREET LIGHTING, ETC„ )
. «. ter+..«..... ..«....w.w...�—�r.rrr....«
JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
G WHAT f?EVF.NUE (S) WILL THE PROPOSAL REQUIRE FOR THE ACCOMPLIS
HMENT of ITS
GOALS AND WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTIVE SOURCES OF SUCH REVENUES) s
H . ESTIMATE TO THE BEST OF YOUR ABILITY THE EFFECT OF THE PROPOSAL ON :
�. COST OF GOVERNMENTAL. SERVICES AND CONTROLS : _ I
2. ADEQUACY OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS :
MUTUAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS : _-
4 . LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTY ; _
I , IS THERE ANY SERVICE NOW BEING PROVIDED IN 'THIS 'ANNEXATION WHICH ' WILL
SO,.F' BE PROVIDED BY THE ANNEXING CITY OR DISTRICT? I DESCRIBE ;
IN VETAIL' WHAT STEPS WILL BE TAKEN UPON 'ANNEXATION TO DETACH' FROM ANY .
DISTRICTS)— WHERE A DUPLICATION OF SERVICE AND TAXATION WOULD BE
—I NVOLVED '
t
JUSTIFICATION OF: PROPOSAL
.. SERVICES AN6 MAJOR PROACTS TO BE PROVIDED BY PROPOSED AGENCY 'IN
FIRST AND SECOND YEAR OF OPERATION ;
2 , PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY�S OPERATION. ATTACH
PROP05ED BUDGET SHEETS AS EXHIBIT 411 TO PROPOSED REQUEST .
31 ESTIMATF,C! TAX RATE FOR FIRST TWO YEARS OF AGENCY ' S OPERATION
ATTACH TAX APE PROPOSALS AS EX141BIT "C" TO PROPOSED REQUEST ,
:.I
Ar. L." L•RNATI V!~S TO PROVIDING SERVICES OTHER THAN BY INCORPORATION OP ,
FORMATION ; _.
t�
1
I
;i
ml SUBMIT ON A SEPARATE SHEET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 14H'I CH' lAY.:EE OF
1 VALUE TO THE COMMISSION, 'IN REACHING A DEC I S'I ON SON THE PROPOSAL
:
-
° i
APPLICATION DATA SHEET
f•
• COUNTY OF ORMGr.-
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATm CttmsstON
5'15 NoRT SYCAMORE STREET , RW� 101
sANTA ANA, cAu r-ORN I A 92701
al
Proposals subject to Local Agency Formation Co rmsion i evi ew and a, royal ':. '�
n 9 pp cannot:_
be initiated until application is made to and :accepted:-for fi 1 in ' b the Executive
Officer. Each application must contain substantialy the following:
1 . Justification of Proposal
2. Map and Legal (metes b bounds) Description `
Ma ,
Professionally drawn bl ackl ine map d f pi c ting the:,6oundari es .o4f:
proposal , and such information as th , ti tle of the proposal , acreage, .
bearings and distances; north a;;rrow, •scale ,; paint of beginning;': location '� {';:•'
map, etc. Map size shall be on 81j" x 14" when:possible.?-, A 'reproduc`ible
map on sepia, vellum, etc. is required for anything 'larger, ,
Legal Description :
Description shall be typed on Bk-,11. x 11 " or 81A" x 14" apes so tnat
xerox copies can be pruducEd from the :same. Identification' of ;
proposal must not cosiflict with that inscribed on map. ,
3. Applicable fee
4. Initial Study ,?
Pursuah` al '.Quality
nt to the provisions of.'the Cal t farm a Envt ronment L.
Act of 1970 the Initial' Study form :is designed to assist the
d g � t roil Executive. Officer , in ' determinin e�;vi mental impacta', if any� �
relative to''a proposal file with the LAM .T f an Envi ronmeptal
.p g ration ) prepare,yin connyctigon wi th Doci� .
m_nt (E 1 R or ale atz tre De,.l G .
an.,earlier project is applicable to the .activ�it underl yir. the
proposal , then that document shall be submitted in lieu of the
Initial study form.
t
,
1 +
%IUSTIr"ICATIQN 0� PROPOSAL
,
COUNTY OF ORANGE.
LOCAL AGENCY FORt•1ATI'ON COMMI SS ION ,L
COUNTY ADM I N I STRAT I ON 'BU I LD I NG
515ROOM'
NORTH SYCAMORE 'STREET, ROOM 101
SArJTA ANA, CALI FORK I A 92701
+; t
:
IN ORDER TO FACILITATE Tf4E COMMISSION S REVIEW OF THE FACTORS SET FORTH`
1 N GOVERNMENT CODE SECTI ON 54796 'YOU ARE REQUIRED, PURSUANT ;Tc YLair NO', 7
3110 TO!'C0mPLETE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE BESY . OF` YOUR ABItIT'{ .
i
Y tr
;i ry}
JUSTIFICATION OF "PROPOSAL
r ,
TITLE of PROVOSAL _
r
APPLICANT
NAME
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE 'NUMBER : AREA• CODE C }
A� GENERAL
1 -TYPE AND DES I GNAT4I'O N OF PROPOSAL
STATUTORY PROVI SlONS GOVERNING •- ,
.� R�1 I NG PROCEED I N PaGS ; .,
31 , REASONS ` FOR THE PROPOSAL : (BE `SPECIFIr)
.._.. .. .:+•- /:,. .a. ..,...._..,-re.. ::ar.:,,CrJL 1iii"a_.''r :.:r+.r+.1-...':d. "•9S,Vlr+•.?+a't }.� —t. —i.. _ _
r
"OFPROP
JUSTIFICATION
f
Be PHYSICAL FEATURES { •.1'
(R �p
�., LAND' AREA: SQUARE 141 LES ACRES
{
Z; STATE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TOPOGRAPHY . :
i
c /
i
3� DESCRIBE NATURAL. FEATURES , lWATERCOURSES, RIDGE_INES, RAVINES,
! ETC , )
si
46 DESCRIBE "MAN--MADEr' FEATURES : (FLOOD CONTROL CHANNELS, FREEWA' YS,,M j
RAILROADS, ETC . )
DESCRIBE 14AJOR HIGHWAY ACCESS TO THE AREA :
psi
I i
6, DESCRIBE PROXIMITY OF PROPOSAL TO ANY AIRPORT AND/OR FLIGHTPATH :
• rf
x Co POPULATION AND RELATED MATTERS
POPULATION IN SUBJECT AREA ; �.
Z. POPULATION DENSITY ( I .E . , PER SQUARE MILES, PER ACRE) :~
31 HUMBER OF 1EGISTERED VOTERS : ..w. .. --- _....._._.._......,;.�.._... .......'.
}.
J UST I'F I CAT I ON "OF PROPOSAL.
. F
4 flUMNER OF DWELL I NG I114 1 TS
5 PROXIMITY
'TO OTHER POPULATED AREAS :
60 LIKELIHOOD '0F SIGNIFICANT' INCREASE IN POPUL'ATI01) ' IN THE NEXt'. 1�
YEARS : w
i
7 . LIKELIHOOD OF SIGNIFICAtJT INCREASE IN ADJACENT AREAS IN THE NEXT
jl T ,
10 YEARS
A. IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS :
D IN INCORPORATED AREAS ., _ .. -
D, ECONOMIC FACTORS
11 -'PLANNING, ZONING AND RELATED hiATTERS
A . DESCRIBE THE EXISTING LAND USE IN THE AREA WH I CH IS THE SUBJECT
:OF THEPROPOSAL: (BE' SPECIFIC)
B . DETAIL EXISTING LOMING :
.. � ti••r•r1.••.wr..w+Nr�•►�rw •�..r.rr�..�.w�wwa.rM�.�.Yr+VY+�..�r/Y•r.�.r.r wTr...�.wOw.A•1ti..►
If i
JUSTI FI CATI ON : OF PROPOSAL
C DESCRIBE PROPOSED CHANGES IN ZON I NG OR PREOZ
i ` ` 1 ON I NG I F ANY s
Do INDI �.
CATS LAND *USE USE DE:S I GNATI ON AS PRESCRIBED BED BY THE ORANGE
COUNTY GENERAL PLAN
' 4
E . IF IN A CITY S GENERAL PLAN, 1NDICATE ITS LAND USE': DES I GNAT[.CN
f
FOR THE SUBJECT TERRITORY ;
I
F , INDICATE ADOPTED SPHERE OF - INFLUENCE PLANS OF ANY .LOCAL
AGENCIES Wfl I CH MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSAL: ,
i
2, AGRICULTURAL PRESER.-VE AND OPEN SPACE FACTORS
A , DOES THE PROPOSAL INVOLVE ANY TERRITORY U1,1DER AN AGRhCULTURA L
PRESERVE
� ERYE CONTRACT.? IF So, STATE THE: PARTIES THEREOF .. .
B , HAS EITHER A NOT I C•• OF NON—RENEWAL OR NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
- BEEN FILED WITH THE. COUNTY RECORDER �S OFFICE? IF F SO,
STATE 'mE DATE OF FILING ;
Cc ULD ' THE PROPOSAL INDUCE, FACILITATE OR LEAD TO THE CONVERSION
OF EXISTING OPEN SPACE LANDS TO USES OTHER THAN OPEN SPACE USES
IF S O, PLEASE EXPLAIN
i
j
f
4 '
—'_........•.•."'r1r^.,..it tt;'.'. ,�C,{.L.�:�."•":if.� �. : � C. i.: - '-::I bi:.:%WLnn_._..s!IC7M►A. M � ---"rw''cy� ,�.1
JaTI F r CA " 1 t TION OF PR'4P
Jt OSAL,
3a ASSESSEb VALUATION IN AREA
'A LAND
^ • ` ` B: 'J11f ROVEMENTS ,
C f,MOIlNT OF PUBLICLY OWNED ' LAND IN THE AREA'; _.._
4 - AMOUNT OF SALES TAX COLLECTED IN AREAS
,
E GOVER (DESCRIBE I N SUCH DETAIL AS I S , APr RO
,. �N�1IrNTAL' SERVICES I N AREA . "
O , IN.
PRIA7E TO "THE AREA THE EXISTING GOYSRNhEfJTAL SERVICES AND GONTRS
OR EXAMPLE, POLICE PROTE
THE AREA I . I PIG, . F , . ;NC LUD CT I ON, FIRE PROTECT I ON;
HEALTH SERVI C' �.S, GARI;AGE & TRASH COLLECTION; LIBRARIES, PARKS RE~CRE-
ATION SERVI CEO, SEWERS , S7REET h1A! tdTENANCE, STREET LIGHTING, `ETC , lo
)
�......,_.......-....._... ... -r.. �.._....�.....-...-. .�. .............� ..._ .,
� ;��
r
JUS'rI FI CATION bF2 NROPOSAL
F .,,NEE J 'FAR AU111 T I f��IAI_ GOVERNMENTAL SERVE CFS OR l:Ot11'r�OLS '
n S�Cil11;E • TI10SE .(;OVI=Ri(NiENTAL �SERVICES�, 0R �CONTO.' LS VIRI�CH �SHOULD.`BE
R E N PROVi D1•
OW
n WFI'i CN n NOT PROVIDED ` OR WHICH 'SHOULD BE PROV I DED {
I N 1lkRI-ASED AMOUNTS TS IN •r `
=
FIE AREA :
t
2 Ec-,-r i M AT E PROBABLE FUTURE NEED FOR NEW OR INCREASED' GOVERNMENTAL
SERVICES ,OR CONTROLS IN T MC AREA :
31 DESCRIBE, HOW THE PROPOSAL MEETS THE 'NEED(S) AS NOTED I N, .PARAGRAPHI
FI A0 FZ ABOVE : .�
I'
11 r
1 . WHAT ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION EXIST FOR MEETING THE NEEDtS)
140'1 ED ABOVE , DESCRIBE AND EVALUATE :
, r
JUSTIFICATION OF ROROSIIL,
ASSfLSSCD VALUATION IN' AREA
,A I' LAND`;
A •I14PROVEMENTS
C e AMOUNT of PUBLICLY
� • Y 014NED LAND 1N THE AREA:
i
AMOUNT OF SALES TAX -COLLECTED I N AREA
l .
1
:•,} AL -SERVICE • • _ S UCN �DETA I L"AS _I S APr RO-..
E , G�JVERNAIENT 5 I N� ARCA.- DESCRIBE I N ,
i, P.R I ATE TO- TEE AREA TE{E EX I ST I NG GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND .CONTROLS*!', IA
I
THEAREA 'INCLUI)IPIG, FOR EXAMPLE POLICE PROTECTION , :FIRE PROTFCTION,.
HEALTH SERVICES, GARBAGE & TRASH COLLECTION, -• LI ARARI ES , 'PARKS ' &, REGRE~.
ATION SERVICES, SEWERS.# STREET MAIWENANCE , STREET 'LI GHTI yG; ETC. )
1
1
frww.+M•!��• Mr••r•�rrrw•••••�w w-w• •.••.w✓�•r••-r-
••n --- N•__ •_mow r+`.�/r.•.__r_• ... _r.......�r.y_ r r_r_y ��_ -
•
•
`JUST I FII CATION.*OF -`PROPOSAL
,
NEED FOR AD11ITIO�JAL GUVLRNhi"NTAI. SERVICES `
' r . 1 OR COII'1'rIOLS '
'I hENTAL SERVICES
-OR
�Tn SC�� I )3E THOSE `CVER 604
ULS• WHICH isHOULD BE i
` V,R0V I DI D WH I Cii ARE', NOW 'NO1 PROVIDED OR WHICH SHOULD BE PROVIDED ' a
IN I NCREASCD' Ah106NTS IN THE APEA.
i' 2. ESTIMATE PROBA)3LE FUTURE NEED FOR NEW OR INCREASED GOVERNMENTAL: t
AI SERVICES OR CONTROLS IN -THE AkEA ;
31 DESCI;II3E. HAW THE PROPOSAL MEETS THE NEEDCS) AS. .NOTCU. IN. PARAGRAPHS
.'�
Fl A`ND" F2 ADOVE w
•
I
I. WHAT I EXIST `FOR MEEI ' 'ING THE- NEEDCS
�tLTEIlyllT I VE CO(1RSES OF ACTT OP ,
s
NU♦tED ABOVE? DESCRI BE AND. EVALUATE
,
, •-1 f l�z i'i
' t
1:
JUSTIFICATION 'OF' PROPOSAL
r J,
r•
1'
. r
! i ,�...- '...,&.i. 1Li+'r Oi ft 1 �
G", WHAT`�ftEVE�hIUE�S) 111I LL THE"PROC'USAL REQUIRE " FOR THE ACCOMPLI SNMENT OF I TS•,
GOALS AND WHAT ARE THE PROSPECTIVE SO
, URGES Ot' SUCH REVENUE Cs) .•-�._.._: -.
Jj
Ho ESTIMATE TO THE BEST .OF YOUR AB I 'LITY THE • EFFECT OF AL THE PROPOS ON I'
1 COST OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES AND CONTROLS :
ADEQUACY OF GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES ANU' CONTROLS
3. MUTUAL SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INTERESTS
r . 44 LOCAL' GOVERWIF PETAL STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTY :
I . IS THERE ANY SERVI CE ' NOW EC ING PROVI D,ED IN 'THIS "ANNEXATION WH I CN WILL i
BE . RUVI DAD BY THE ANNEXING CITY OR DI.
o c STRICT? IF `'S0, DCSCRIBE' -
:1I LL ' BE TAKEN UPON 'ANNEXATI O
I.N DET/1I L WHAT STEPS I N• TO -DETACN � FROP�1 ANY,
• , .' ;:
D I STR•i OT C S•) INHERE A DUP L I CAT I ON OF SERVICE AW TA?tA T I ON WOULD. -BE
' ...n,ww„r.w hrtah..��Irrr�w•r�u.0 .wr+rr•rrr•w...•.w.h�r.....u.wF.ti�r��iwwi.+r ,-,li
MM• Yr Yr rl�rrrw•,wrra+�rr••••ti MrY rr•rr..w��rrry r..�tir•.r'
' . r••M�.r�y•rar•�Frr.a.Mu rr�.�•�r."•r r�r �.�r. ��Y� • '
r•�.r.,r..�.•.w. .•. r. rrr�..ww•r�.r��hr r•M•�r.hrw Nrr.MM.�.�rr.whrl w• M�h•w�w.rtir�w•'M�...�rY
' .. t^„ ;lr.v...-...,...... ..,.....w............:.........•..........-.,_..'.. .. ..,.. _......_.. - tw rY•.Ae+f .,1'e. :'.>.:.r r..-- ..,. — -w.r..;l,X�'. .'rIH:.IMpMy!'0['RI,. �
+ JUSTI I-ICAT ION O PROPOSAL
7 THE NAMES OF ALL .COUNTIES, CITIES AND. DISTRICTS AFFECTED::; ,..
POOPOSAL: BY T ,
,
K, 'USE SPACE
BELOW ..FOR ANY- GTHER COMENT YOU WISH TO MAkE
I. _
., '.��.r+.�++ter: t _ ;�•.
t
Q��4'���5�. �li,rl�nZtali�t��1'f��j�\�li�%J'RI.,IY��1�y+Sff���{(s,. Yr�,Y�It.-�i'N7'•+"^"—... .,.,,�.•r e. { •+wt��c.L ..
. ., JUSTIFLCAT-ION: OF F'FtOPOSAL: . ; ' •. •;�;�,
'
, 1
1
-
3
:-SERVICES `�NU , MAJOR PR(�JEC '3' TO'BE PROVIn.ED°'BY. PROPOSED' AGENCY
_FIRST AND -SECOND YEAR OF OPERATION
1.
� _r.••.r.• w.�..._�w �•r.war•�r..r+r.•rw.rr•rp.r�r•i...w�wr.rr.r�w.
1 ,
-ARS ; OF AGENCY . .. ,
21 PROPOSED GET F FIRST TWO YE S„'OPERATIONS ATTACH
' •:. "' if 1 �f •i`1 1 :K,.. :, �;sati'.�.ry, +,�•
PROPOSED BUDGET' 'SHEE.TS AS EXHIBIT B TO PROPOSED REQUEST
3 ESTIMATED TAX • RATE ,FOR FIRST TWO YEARS Or AGENCY, S OPERATION
►l ATTACH TAX `RATE PROPOSALS AS EXI, 18I1 f',r Ta �ROPosE z ..�.
D REQUEST''
` 4 . ALTCKNATIVES TO PROVIDING SERVICES OTHER JHAN BY INCOR ' " ATI0N O'
FORMATION :
�1
1`.
l r
�O mo SUBMIT ON' A 'SEPARATE SHEET ADDITIONAL I NIF k '
! � FORMAT ON' 'hfN i CH, I.1�IY BE OF
VALUETO 'HIE COMMI SS 1014 IN REACH I NC A DEC I S I ON ON THE PROPOSAL '
,
rw.0 .• .. na:.:J'•` 'Jrsras.N.••""..... . . �...••a -..:... .«L.•rw........r_ , al•zy.; a.111 P.,r n'i.r.......•._. ....5..t, ' .. ..+...H.:,Ni NTt���'1 .�
tsti r �
i
JUST I fi I CATION OF PROPOSAL
LI S� T11E< NAt ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE N11M.13ER OF EitCN PERSON iX I t'iM). :;
Yflt! WI St 1 f�OTI CES AND COMMUN I CATIONS ' REGARDING THE PROPOSAL TO. BE , SENT
NAME:: -
ADDRESS : , ,
zip .CODE : .".
TELEPHONE .NUMBER: AREA CODE
NAME::
ADDRESS :. �. M.__ ZIP CODE
E UMBER AREA C TELEPHONE N ODE
NAME :
ADDRESS: ZIP� CODE ;
' TELEPHONE NUMBER : AREA CODE { )
i r .};.c {,••)7l t,.M...'1.Y..•...i'i w.:.M...,. ,.�.... .�-++hrrel v .r.rtA Yr..•.. -•.^++... ;j.. •1.,u —•�+
Imo:`' t,''^`�t' .. rt�;_�(�i - - -�� ft��,r•.,
,
I N I'f IAi. STUDY F
COUNTY OF ORANGE
LOCAL AGENCY'• Y- FORNA•f• IOrt Comm lssJotrt
P, a, Box 687
SAhTA AhA, 'CALIFORNIA 92702
.t:
~
�4.,?IL .ir. THIS I N I T I AL. STUDY I S A. -�lR s\Et AND HAS NO OFFICIAL STA
TUS UNLESS
REVIEVIED ANP FI Np,L1 ZED 3Y AN AUTHORIZED LAFCO STAFF OFFI CI C.L. LArCD ' .
RESERVES ' THE RIGHT TO EDIT THE DRAFT AS PIECESSARI''
AN INITIAL, STUDY IS REQU,IREG 3FOR C6MPLIANCE, 1-11TH THE .CALIFORNIA ENV IROMMENTAL QUAL:I.TI
ACT:.OF 97D.':� NOT -ALLa,PROJEC•f5REYtE1'lED ArID ACTED UPOPI BY,,Tt{E LOCAL AGENCY' FORMATION j
COMA , ,,, ot4 WILL REQUIRE'.TtlE PREPARATION OF A111 ttIVIRONMENTAI IMPACT 'REPORT.,, IN -ORDER TO
DETERMINE• WHETHER OR NOT; A PROJECT WILL, IIAVE .A SIGNIFICANT ,EFFECT `ON THE 'ENVIRONMENT,
THE';FOLL01-lING, INITIA
L,` BE, FILLED OUT IN DETAIL. AND SUBMITTED TO THE LAFCO
EXECUTIVE OFFICER. THE-'EXECUTIVE OFFICER WILL, .AS SOW AS POSSIkE4 EVALUATE THEN
'PROJECT'BASED.'ON THE '-INFORMATION PROVIDED AND: OTHER_FACTORS AND WILL DETERMINE I•tFIETHER
OR`'NOT, ,THE. PROJECT WILL REQUIRE AN EIR AND WILL NOTIFY TflE o PROPONENT-ACCORDINGLY. :IF
AN EIR 'IS :REQUIRED'-THE PROPONENT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING AND SUBMITTING .A
'DP.AFT' ' EIR `TO -LAFCO. IF AN EIR IS NOT REQUIRED, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE ISSUED
FOR THE PROJECT AND FILED WITH 1HE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.
1. PROJECT TITLE:
L. PROJECT LOCATION:
3. ' REASON(S) FOR THE PROJECT (be specific) :
4. DOES THE PROTECT INVOLVE PROPOSED (or ongoing) DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY?
IF SO, DESCRIBE THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT AND ITS PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS (i .e. , `
purpose, size, number of uni ts , etc. ) ; _ �,.._....
r
5. EXISTING ENVIRO'NMEN'T 'OF THE PROJECT SITE ANn SURROUNDING AREA:
301 Topography }
ri.i?. Ai Q tial ty t
5.3 tlatel uaIit , surf(Ice `and/a • sit1)wrf6Ce
• � y (. =. • . . -' _..._._....mac..... __ ... _... _ ._:,. -...
5.4 Mineral Resources
5.5 Flora E Fauna (emphisis on rare, endangered or unique species).
5. 6 Ambient Noise Levels
5.7 Archaeological/Paleontological Resources
5.8 Population _
5.9 Public Services
5. 10 Improvements (tie specific)
6. 'ANT'ICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL '_'I'MPACTS OF THE PROJECT UPON
6. 1 Topography
6.2 Air Quality
E. 3 Water'Qu0ity _ ._..�. ,_....:
6.4 Mineral Resources
r
,
:
K Pub f).t1 t « 1SC Leve)s
6. 7 At-chaeoiogical/Paleontological Resources
6.8 Population
;f.
6.9 Plibl'i c Services
7. THE IS PRO `_ PROJECT LOCATED IN' Ah AREA AFFECTED BY (or to be affected by) HIGH irOISE
LEVELS, SUCH- AS AIRPORTS , ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS, RAILROAD' TRAFFI! ETC? ;F S02
PLEASE .EXPLAIN:
8. IS THE PROJECT NEAR A'NY LOCALLY OR RFGIOIALLY SIGNIEICAMT NATURAL OR CULTURAL,
RESOURCE , SUCH AS A WATERCOURSE, HILLSIDE OR THE BEACH? IF SO, PLEASE
EXPLAIN :
9. IS THE PROJECT IN CONFLICT WITH ENVIR0?11I.ENTAL PLANS OD GOALS THAT HAVE BEEIN
4DOPTED BY THE COMMUNITY WHERE THE PROJECT IS TO BE LOCATED? IF SO
PLF•ASE EXPLAIN
. I
F
,
( 1 r'tITT! t (1' ; 1 +! �' •:r 1l: 'r��t� l ,,". l�f. • lrr 1�1 1 rr lW, i ;)
I5;' F'rlCiltlltAf"tl n rt7 !?ISGI' l 'ANY AOUI i'IOflft"' INI_04'91A1 1(IN tlit'f f,.tf f!<1'1 "1;l
,C
PERTInEN•f TO' HIS S1unY , use llniilTl'�IrAL' PnrFS Ir rdt�Crsant2Y
1
I1 .. PLEASE INGICrirE"ALL',ri'1HER AGENCIES I•lflICli :NIIVE , URISOICTION OVER •ALL W,°A' F'Ol2TIUtt
OF THE .PROJECT, HAVE TO CONSIDER PERMITS. FOR THE, PROJECTS, ARE , INVOLVEn" IN THE
PROJECT'S FUN� NG, OR ARE OTfItR61ISF AFFECTED E;Y THE PROJECT:
SUBMITTED BY DATE:
(Signature)
NAILING ADDRESS
1i
ZIP CODE
PHONE NUMBER: AREA CODE
REVIEWED AlD FINALIZED BY:
DATE:
�Jaauery 6, '1569 ,
• t ' Box 242 ,
since at Beach, 'Crxli 0 i ,
Mayor. Aavin M. - Coen ,
Memorial Ha11, 5th and Pecan ,
Huntington Beach , CaliT.
Subject : Request or Annexatio�a of Suns et. Beach
to -the .Opity of Huntington Beach
• near Sir:
uuderB ed respectfully
1 ;
We, they:, ectfully eau :that ;th ign r est' e
caof xuntington�.Bea�ch and"erta4e the; . , ep
toward a�zn exat i on.'t o,Hunt
necess at a
eted area of Orau� e County known' Does eh'''oP ,the':unincorpor-
g y known as' Sunset Beach.
'property .,
s re �. oviner� of, sunset Beach w .. •�,
�sidents �,anda ;:. _
are 'dedicated to" h'e ,immediate, and long ran 'e '' oaSa of
Treservin• im rovin h. .,
o, accomplish , these . dbjo tives ,well look forward'toQ'devel�- -
' . P g
t er Plan with
your P�.anninayCo
y desirable and- f easibl a Mee
gl midssion and, other City ,agencies con.oerned.
The request ; For,. annexation 19- made, of I course', with t}ie
understanding that a Master.Plan acceptable- to this com-
munity ` would be developed 'prior to the aaaexatioa "'election.
This ,; ,. •, .
Master Plan and-;new long range Program would,
be d*eveloped for the benefit of our residents, property
owners, and ,bu' six esa interests , as well as the oitizenn
of Huntington Beach and Orange County.
The .0 g unt Plannin Commiosion currentl bee
_ ran a Co
under. consideration proposals for zoning `changes which are
unacceptable to this . community. .'Therefore, we, would apprga-
late your coati deration and action on this request at the
earliest possible date.
Very truly ycurs,
Mrid King., Pres t,
Sunset Beach' Chem er of Commerce
LQ
Chairman , oomunity Co ci Board Member;; Chem e o
for the treserration , cl Im- 'Co roe , Sunset ch
pre ement of Sunset each ,
I � '.
�jo �'
ember, Citizens A vino y C a• rmen P Pic Ave e r
Board Oommittee
o� chairman', 1sa d ?improve reasurer, C any ear o cstr�norre
ment Committee ' Suns et Beach
DK:vmMI
I
•
1
S r. '1'• M�Ww .l
iepW
:77,
w Ida
'r4
e--eo)
l
�.
•s
' '.1. 'a-'�`� \►.�t' i 1 R•l'� '� -1i(�il�.;y, l i��111� ��/�S�.w..� t, � ter iYl L�rUU's�tp��
I
•
.,.:h.f.o .•.;,..'.a...,. .......k..P ' t....l'.:a ....,t` h r .1 r. '.wl,� +_... 1
•
I J •
Hu ti gton :Beadh Plafloing ammission
P'0. •Box_40 CALIFO lA 9264b ,
Fe brur 1 a
Y3 959
ti cf-
• � •'`• -_COL
,
Y COUNCIL 0. •0 HONORABLE OR CITY
T H N MAY ANU •,�c,
,
FROM: Planning Cocnnission % ••�,
SUBJECT. e s t for Ann' 1*41
,q exaLion' af,"Sunset Beach to
the City of Huntington Beach
ATTENTION: Doyle Miller, 1, Cj,ty• Administrator
Paul Jones, City Clerk .
Gentlemen:
The City :o f Huntington Beach`, h8s been request ed t l ..
` e to undertake i
the,: nece'ssary steps: to annex' an unincorporated';,are$ of .'Orange
ain residents • a d ..ro-
f County
yowners o� ,Sunset. Beach`, �Thi s r• . „ . _. . P . ,
g un rwatded to
party q
set Beach: a uest was fo
�h= PLannin eCrcmn Isis a on to January ; 11; I, 69; meeting:.foC
s1on .at ' the Q
eport . or.., r mme ti your. Honorable Body pursuant,.to
Section 35148` of the Annexation Act of 1913.
d c nsiderati'
. J.
After ue o on , it was.l the. Planx�in Ga�rcnisaion! s
una ort to:> xecoamend; in view o the rY$pidity of
tl is, pro9osalf s culmfnation, that a . a PP.• p p ... ',p sitiv :,R r ch •b , ;
taken in:: thedeveYopment of an; action-study ;progxun.r The,
t '
: `
y, :working in close,,'cooperation w3.th': SunsetBeach co�aiuunity
re resentat .ve$
C t ould� identif problems` aridi offer il�ternative sh Y ,
solutions 'concernin ;the area .`and `the :�proposed' annexat,iori
a ex t! a workable: Ma 4
, � stet. P�.an mutually,,; ccpt8ble�,,should '.be
l •develoge
ed 3�}:Third`; ,.a program of pre-.zonfng of the..,,et tire , area
wouls� u'Imi.natied or in prx�ccss Prior to lannexatioh.
biped with ositive action' as df.fferent haves of the study
•ocess would "include-an accelerated • stud of the area c -
• P P dY
are completed.
Respectfully ubmftted,
K.-A. Reynol a
Secretary, Piannia&',,-Commission
KARa dr
l.
ti&tri%;f.. i tNT .'r MIRL. !t�a�71I77YML�i' ...fl"-.£W! '
w...�...r _
ORIGINAL
COPV
1z
,
h
Febr;sary 3, L9 G19 j
1'0 t3CNQrBhE MAYORAND CITY COUNCIL
ERCHS Kann'" Cession
SUBnCT: Heipest for Aunw$t1 ►' of Sunset I ch to
the Cit.v: of t3=bingt6n Wench
ATTENTIQNs Doyle Miller, City Administrator
Paul Jones, City Clerk
A
�ntlemeil�t
Thal City' of Hunti> stont Beach ba beam• requested to uiWe "'i�ke
their-Meassa y steps, to amwx !an',unitxcorpozated:,area of 4raage ,
i coutaty:, i 360h as Sishiel: Beach, b��',,'c� extniu;'.resfdeuts and.. p ro- .
per ,Owners of: Suneat Beat %is
e -a-o st was Fazw�ai�td �to $
the ", ueming Catemission ,apt the Jlru�ary ,21 ��19G9, wasting: for �f_
e' spport or recoc ue�tion. 'to youz Honorab1s Rody ..p s'uant to
Sect3an 35108 of the Amexation Act of 191:3.
Ater >du on it was the Flax I Cc�mr�i.es3:oas .s
e •crnoeic�erati
s�naui�aous dec siur� :to: recommrend, :in..wicaw;. ahs';rapWI" : of }
E his proposal"e Gulmiilatian� tEaet a ositive`:a ro�►ch' :be "y
tsken is tbn 'deMetoptaent ,of .an "r lonw.atudy.f pro "
. ,Tl�e
y,: op►eration; iitis"Sunseeltct3t.ya
�i ,rOMM Ives , `should, fdentify_,�probiemsa a ff�er, r ,'
taticags coeraiage 'araa ,sad the proposed axxatiax►. :�
Nc3xt: ' a trotticb�.e rSastaac', P mutually ;acceptable;,"'Shauld;Toe .
devaf v . 'Mid ': a' program cf .rreia son 'o f: the entirs' area
would be cu�nLaated or .in process prkor to amexatione, Thia�
praceas wo+�,d iucluode an ec�celeratod ,study of the 'area pose-
t, bred with poeititvwe action ass different 'p ses of the study ,
ara cawpleted.
' Re fitfully submitted,
Socrataryt Pl�arxdng Commission �
Ulldr
f
"c
► ,
W. "06011 OF MuFunm
s xE"fit"AT14NDl 11AGUE o/ CITIES .,
, � � . Mr�e�Aiwe;dAwJ •• ��,
. ,' •,•''•W11T11114 CITT'• CJf►1CIAt'1'U/tIGTIQN-i • ;.*`•+
s , Berieky 94703 Nole! Cla eno t
ra Ir 84 •3C83 rilrta *rode
Lo.r'AitRdei 90017 7925'1a�ter Ciitter 624.49.34 . .'�lr,a'Cod r 21.1 ` r
' Aerkele'y, 011ilbrnU : r
OPFK
its Iluguat 23, 1965 s
! )&Aft Mi[IM YMeyer. bogies-Oaks
• :14., '�^, -. 1.
Fiat l/ia•/NIIlMI,
a; f Rtl►IN s111/1 - Mr.. ft%;C•
y AN,.., 094 61400
s.«w vk: C1ty 41erk
JAa o MAITER!/ lbmtington Beacb, Califo=la
MAY".So"toom4flo
hd�a,ilfii,
x Jaw be"m . . D"Lr PIltiLl•
<,QryGs.eAt►InM,
� taolwtw Qt.a».
RKMft CAVEW1l Please im=aa the delry' ` i wtvrr your Lu' 'Y
N„
on'concerning the 1e$tU4.-y ,Of the propw O#
t'
a�t7iaY•� tide-
! DRO T C
?.ands adjacent to:'the 'city.
Since. 2 iclRv_ir'au;ylst ,z ;t�l►i►� �
�OMfT r. iakaleaic + attaaded the xiericaaa'Bar Asdooiation''A�saual'Caaxtei ace a i
City Akta►w.y,sa ,t.la ti
l,trlu'A. allies h&Te bcon trying 'to 'Catch: as•.the gi,La of-Lettere as aw. >
It6118a.1 City 0484.•<for Plead desko i bare a question coccQzatag the validity. of•`such an
,eru/ r.'cvI/!II$gN saaesat on�sn vievr of,a 1963 sam4 sent .o the'.annexation lair.
City c.a..u..�. tsl
chapter 3, a' 1894, stututas 06dd""..Bebtioa':35014 to the Gur am— ,
• ,
vast«,ire O+a.a slept .t' o.ia to .a.ioit a=i=tLQ1a of tha `etata i
/t,»ar C..twvtr to those enca ae vithim the aeewrd, extensime of the
IliuotD ►�t'ilir *xL& Un bIo�ea of the CSty)* '.%•.t4nd*d�,frm hC,,.��ltti .
oti C .O91I~.tat Assets vheie` the ] nd bouWaries it tertl et ttia Pboreliae at suck-Am
X)M,c. WM9104M
w3gle to' tha shoreline and,fol3otrisxg such a cout�'>aQ Y.batr awy
011KNO be so road by the state Lauds Cromtision. ,
a1ati.►;a►1w•
l:W00OfOW.T. mA111[W "
L Y.
# o++..»,.t'►la.aao. /kAma The :purpose .of this bill was .to 'avoid the
RAY,
a
axt ;ticioa. each' the' yr*pa�ted a=' %m aticxs. rtiuld create and .that °
r � o•�/cv auNIN is •the' neaoation of tidelands' xitlio ' b the aan eeoi►tioa' of the �
Cut Coys or ilamem.A ..si.. aa - ,.
f9l040 M. IADWA0411 u .>b0� 'Ii►tleJ.•wm, ♦ e:MASSIMO'-vu ;•dLlpporW .by, F
wl ,aii�yhl. r+eaidexiLs of tbt�,uniacox7orati' area* 'o! ionticitAo loca#,*d:
ivAat a no'11k+/cN Sctska 8a. .ra :o ect'�,to the of :
►.Ia.Gi.l. Deaver scstit?1 cf vhq b `City.. Ssate,8irbem
,i►ai'`rri+rww M Ua&1m 414 mjmcent to thoi, liulnCOx'jrf0rlted v y
0"C W4110*0,soak. MN i
OCle Gowns+. xL1 fa�rr 1, t
ntt► A: s�Notu ;that if �1oo4►ecito e�rytr.,ixt. tad;tta+i►t t:� xa
«,W,IL cra.1 have no` Control over the 'tidelow"4 vhich v6WA be i�ocarat to
POW F. /k!!tt[r
also dose�(� � r+
G"I"W. WADI use 1 ofubm ed strips " a mam of �:O CC . t .thy. s
m"W.Sim fmaglIC. The Iaemcm vsm tO Xi
tloity
tar Afrot.Loan ooth t0 properly be1mg mwevad but vhtob 1e:ct ackl4 dty'with the,
the chut N»+I��laa r..+ .aoQ portion OZ ta]e city:
wo,#emu::re i��n.a... Perhaps rs can dincus s this a ore at .%be CU-r WA rkkks'
"C" wit" meting in ftm CJvimi ate. In tbol aeAatima you ow v1s2f, to discus•
I ems..fNws+«,Rlt+•+*� this % th .7Qiims D. PL=tkt3tt. 3inae .thd BtAt t 1ADdO t3QC11Grr8NI t1
wA+�at wlgf/1t1 .,
►wimpor mot s the sammtion.. they � baTO leas* 'new ir..0" an
AlkARL
Una
ti W. I CA* subject: also
Mfg IAMsic
+
is . . s �, . r✓
f
a a:, W1 . ,
t ;
•