Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutInfrastructure Fund Annual Report for FY 2014-2015 Dept. ID Pw 15-056 Page 1 of 2 Meeting Date: 9/8/2015 Approved 7-0 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: 9/8/2015 SUBMITTED TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members SUBMITTED BY: Fred A. Wilson, City Manager PREPARED BY: Travis K. Hopkins, PE, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Receive and file the Infrastructure Fund Annual Report for FY 2014-2015 Statement of Issue: The City Charter requires an annual review and performance audit of the Infrastructure Fund and a report of the findings to the City Council prior to adoption of the following fiscal year budget. This review covers the current fiscal year (FY) 2014-15. Financial Impact: None. Recommended Action: Receive and file the Infrastructure Annual Report for FY 2014-2015. Alternative Action(s): Instruct staff to make revisions and resubmit at a later date. Analysis: The Infrastructure Fund was established 2002, by City Charter Section 617(c), which states, "the City Council shall by ordinance establish a Citizens Infrastructure Advisory Board (CIAB) to conduct an annual review and performance audit of the Infrastructure Fund and report its findings to the City Council prior to adoption of the following fiscal year budget." Prior to this fiscal year, the Public Works Commission acted in this capacity. Earlier this year a separate Board was established by City Council. Two meetings have been held to date (July 15 and August 12) to review the Infrastructure Fund performance audit and confer on other issues pertaining to the City's infrastructure. The single substantial revenue source to the Infrastructure Fund is transfers of excess General Fund revenue. Transfers are made pursuant to Reserve Policies adopted in FY 2006-2007 and revised in FY 2009-2010. A $3 million transfer from the General Fund to the Infrastructure Fund is programmed for the current fiscal year. Total expenditures this year are projected to be $1,513,057. The fund balance at year's end is projected to be $9,064,587. Per the City Charter, the Infrastructure Fund is designated for the sole purpose of infrastructure expenditures. "Infrastructure" is defined in the Charter as 'long-lived capital assets that normally are stationary in nature, and normally can be preserved for significantly greater number of years. They include storm drains, storm water pump stations, alleys, streets, highways, curbs and gutters, Dept. ID PW 15-056 Page 2 of 2 Meeting Date: 9/8/2015 sidewalks, bridges, street trees, landscaped medians, parks, beach facilities, playgrounds, traffic signals, streetlights, block walls along arterial highways, and all public buildings and public ways." Citizens Infrastructure Advisory Board Action: The annual Infrastructure Fund Report was approved at the August 12, 2015, meeting of the Citizens Infrastructure Advisory Board by a vote of 7-0. Environmental Status: Not applicable Strategic Plan Goal: Enhance and maintain infrastructure Attachmentfs): FY 2014-2015 Infrastructure Fund Annual Report •JJ CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITIZEN'S INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY BOARD SUBMITTED TO: Citizen's Infrastructure Advisory Board SUBMITTED BY: Travis K. Hopkins, PE, Director of Public Works DATE: August 12, 2015 SUBJECT: Approve Infrastructure Fund Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 - Revised Statement of Issue: The City Charter requires an annual review and performance audit of the Infrastructure Fund, and a report of the findings to the City Council. The report was presented to the Citizens Infrastructure Advisory Board on July 15, 2015. At that time, the Board requested some minor revisions be made. This information incorporates those revisions. This review covers the current fiscal year (FY) 2014/15. Fundinq Source: Infrastructure Fund No. 314 Recommended Action: Motion to recommend to City Council approval of the Infrastructure Fund Annual Report. Alternative Action(s): Direct staff to modify the Annual Report. Analysis: The Infrastructure Fund was established in 2002, by City Charter Section 617. Per Section 617 (a), the originally intended revenue source for the Infrastructure Fund was a planned utility use tax on natural gas purchased to generate electricity. However, this ballot measure failed. So, while the Charter amendment created the fund, it was left with no source of revenue. Other Charter requirements related to the fund are: • Revenue placed in the Infrastructure Fund shall not supplant existing infrastructure funding. • General Fund expenditures for infrastructure improvements and maintenance, subsequent to 2001 , shall not be reduced below 15% of general fund revenues based on a five-year rolling average. • The City Council shall by ordinance establish a Citizens Infrastructure Advisory Board to conduct an annual review and performance audit of the Infrastructure Fund and report its findings to the City Council prior to adoption of the following fiscal-year budget. Revenue The single substantial revenue source to the fund is General Fund excess fund balance per the Financial Policy adopted in Fiscal Year 2006/07. The Policy was revised beginning in Fiscal Year 2009/10 to allow for an Economic Uncertainties Reserve commitment. Excerpts addressing the Infrastructure Fund for the previous and current policies are shown in Attachment 1 . 1 . The General Fund transfer for FY 2014/15 is $3,000,000. 2. The maintenance agreement for the traffic signal at Beachmont Plaza provides approximately $10,000 annually. This payment is normally received in August and, therefore, has not been received as of the date of this report. The anticipated payment is included in the financial information below. 3. Interest and market adjustments are paid in proportion to the citywide investments and fund balance. Expenditures Budgeted expenditures and expenditure adjustments for FY 2014/15 consisted of carry forward projects from 2013/14, carry over encumbrances and new funds. Where applicable, a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) summary sheet is included with this report in Attachment 2. • Heil Pump Station Property Acquisition - A Hazard Mitigation Grant that will provide $2,250,000 in funding for the project was awarded recently. A separate fund has been created to track the grant funds. Infrastructure funds in the amount of $2,426,057 were carried forward from FY 2013/14. (CIP summary attached) • $1 1 ,864 in encumbrance carry over funds for City Yard improvements. These improvements are completed. • $1 ,000,000 in new funds for the Atlanta Avenue Widening Project - The Project's other funding sources include, $600K in Measure M2 funds, $1 .45M in Prop 42 funds, $896K in Traffic Impact Fee Funds, and $2.2M in grants. (CIP summary attached) • $170,000 in new funds for replacement of the Arena Soccer Artificial Turf. As of the date of this report, these funds have been spent. (CIP summary attached) • The Infrastructure Fund is being used as a holding account for developer fees and expenditures related to the proposed Bella Terra Pedestrian Crossing Project. The FY 2014/15 budget includes $63,639 in encumbrance carry over funds related to preliminary design and $200,000 in carry forward funds designated for construction. However, to date the project has failed to move forward due to the fact the Public Utilities Commission, which oversees railroad crossings, is reluctant to allow an at-grade pedestrian crossing. (CIP summary attached) • FY 2014/15 funds for construction of the Senior Center (CIP summary attached) • include: o $165 in encumbrance carry over funds related to plans and specification printing, o $867,310 of carry forward funds for construction, and o $3,000,000 in new funds for construction. Other funding sources in the current fiscal year budget for the project include a $2M donation from Hoag Hospital and $15M in loans. Due to favorable bid results, it was determined that the entire $3M budgeted in the Infrastructure Fund for the Senior Center would not be needed. Administration directed staff to expend a portion of the funds on other infrastructure needs. These include: • $305,000 for replacement of street lights fixtures with new LED fixtures. • $400,000 for concrete replacement in zone maintenance areas. • $600,000 for the Beach Parking Lot Rehabilitation from the Hyatt pedestrian bridge north to Huntington Street. In addition, on January 20, 2015, City Council approved the appropriation of $1 ,500,000 from the Infrastructure Fund to the Main Street Promenade Parking Structure Rehabilitation and $500,000 for Worthy Park Phase 1 improvements. New budgeted projects for 2015/16 include improvements to Walnut Avenue and 1 It Street lighting. (FY 15/16 CIP summary attached) INFRASTUCTURE FUND (314) Summary Report for FY 2014115 Total Projected Projected Budget/Carry Budget 2014/15 Revenue and Over to FY 2015/16 Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance 9/30/14 $7,559,644 Projected Fund Balance 9/30/15 $9,064,587 Revenue Transfer from General Fund $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Interest and Market Adjustments $8,000 $6,000 Maint. Agreement- Beachmont Plaza $10,000 $10,000 Total Revenue $3,000,000 $3,018,000 $16,000 Expenditures Heil Pump Station Const. and Property ($2,426,057) ($10,000) ($2,323,657) City Yard Building Improvements ($11,864) ($11,864) $0 Atlanta Avenue Widening ($1,000,000) $0 ($1,000,000) Arena Soccer Artificial Turf Repl. ($170,000) ($168,715) $0 Bella Terra Pedestrian Crossing ($263,639) $0 ($263,000) Senior Center ($2,562,475) $0 ($2,562,475) LED Lighting Retrofit ($305,000) ($305,000) $0 Zone Maintenance Concrete ($400,000) ($400,000) $0 Beach Parking Lot ($600,000) ($600,000) $0 Main Street Parking Structure ($1,500,000) ($20,000) ($1,480,000) Worthy Park Phase 1 ($500,000) $0 ($500,000) Walnut Avenue and 1 st Street Lighting ($143,000) Accounting adjustment prior year $2,522 $2,522 Total Expenditures ($9,736,513) ($1,513,057) ($8,272,132) Projected Fund Balance 9/30/15 $9,064,587 Projected Fund Balance 9/30/16 $808,455 Attachments: 1 . Excerpts from Financial Policy adopted FY 2006/07 and 2009/10 2. CIP Summary Sheets Attachment 1 City of Huntington Beach Financial Policies Adopted FY 2006/07 FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING STANDARDS The City's accounting system will be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices and the standards of the Government Accounting Standards Board and the Government Finance Officers Association. The annual financial report will be prepared within six months of the close of the previous fiscal year. The City will use generally accepted accounting principles in preparing the annual financial statements and will attempt to qualify for the Government Finance Officers Association's Excellence in Financial Reporting Program. The City will strive for an unqualified audit opinion. An unqualified opinion is rendered without reservation by the independent auditor that financial statements are fairly presented. The City will contract for an annual audit by a qualified independent certified public accounting firm. The independent audit firm will be selected through a competitive process at least once every five years. The contract period will be for an initial period of three years, with two one-year options. BUDGETING The budget will be prepared consistent with the standards developed by the Government Finance Officers Association and California Society of Municipal Finance Officers. In addition, a summary version will be provided to the public in a user-friendly format. The City will maintain a balanced operating budget for all funds with estimated revenues being equal to, or greater than, estimated expenditures, and with periodic City Council reviews and necessary adjustments to maintain balance. On-going revenues will support on-going expenditures. Revenues from one-time or limited duration sources will not be used to balance the annual operating budget. Support function appropriations will be placed in the department in which they are managed. GENERAL FUND BALANCE The General Fund reserve (designation) will be a minimum of seven percent of the General Fund budget. In addition, a second tier reserve will consist of the net accumulation of amounts that were in excess of the seven percent reserve (designation) and remained in the General Fund after application of the financial policy that immediately follows. This second tier reserve will be used to balance budget fluctuations. Allocation of the audited General Fund balance in excess of the above reserves (designations) may be as follows: 25 percent for capital projects (transferred to the Capital Improvement Reserve) 25 percent for Infrastructure transferred to the Infrastructure Fund) 50 percent to increase the 2 tier reserve All supplemental appropriations from the General Fund minimum reserve that cannot otherwise be funded during the current fiscal year operating budget must meet one of the three following criteria: It is an unanticipated emergency. It is required to implement a Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) or a mandate. It is a new expense that is offset by related revenues. City of Huntington Beach ' . Financial Policies Adopted Budget — FY 2009110 -� FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ❑ The City's accounting system will be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices and the standards of the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) and the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). ❑ The annual financial report will be prepared within six months of the close of the previous fiscal year. The City will use generally accepted accounting principles in preparing the annual financial statements and will attempt to qualify for the Government Finance Officers Association's Excellence in Financial Reporting Program. ❑ The City will strive for an unqualified audit opinion. An unqualified opinion is rendered without reservation by the independent auditor that financial statements are fairly presented. ❑ The City will contract for an annual audit by a qualified independent certified public accounting firm. The independent audit firm will be selected through a competitive process at least once every five years. The contract period will be for an initial period of three years, with two one-year options. BUDGETING ❑ The budget will be prepared consistent with the standards developed by the Government Finance Officers Association and California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO). In addition, a summary version will be provided to the public in a user-friendly format. ❑ The City will maintain a balanced operating budget for all funds with estimated revenues being equal to, or greater than, estimated expenditures, and with periodic City Council reviews and necessary adjustments to maintain balance. ❑ On-going revenues will support on-gang expenditures. Revenues from one-time or limited duration sources will not be used to balance the annual operating budget. ❑ Support function appropriations will be placed in the department in which they are managed_ GENERAL FUND BALANCE ❑ There will be an established Economic Uncertainties Reserve commitment in the General Fund. The goal is to have an Economic Uncertainties Reserve commitment equal to the value of two months of the General Fund expenditure adopted budget amount. ❑ Once established, appropriations from the Economic Uncertainties Reserve commitment can only be made by formal City Council action. Generally, appropriations and access to these funds will be reserved for emergency situations. Examples of such emergencies include, but are not limited to: ■ An unplanned, major event such as a catastrophic disaster requiring expenditures over 5% of the General Fund adopted budget ■ Budgeted revenue taken by another government entity { Drop in projected/actual revenue of more than 5% of the General Fund adopted revenue budget ❑ Should the Economic Uncertainties Reserve commitment be used, and its level falls below the minimum amount of two months of General Fund expenditures adopted budget, the goals is to replenish the fund within three fiscal years. 350 City of Huntington Beach Financial Policiest ° Adopted Budget — FY 2009/10 ' ❑ Allocation of the audited General Fund unassigned fund balance will be done as follows if, and until, the Economic Uncertainties Reserve commitment is fully funded (i.e., two months of General Fund expenditures): • 50%to Economic Uncertainties Reserve commitment • 25% for Infrastructure Fund 25% to Capital Improvement Reserve (CIR) commitment ❑ Once the Economic Uncertainties Reserve commitment attains full funding, unassigned fund balance will be divided as follows: ■ 25%for Infrastructure Fund 25% to Capital Improvement Reserve (CI R) commitment ■ 50% to Equipment Replacement commitment ❑ Any unanticipated and unrestricted revenues received during the fiscal year will be added to the fund balance of the General Fund. FUND BALANCE CLASSIFICATION ❑ The City's fund balance is made up of the following components: Nonspendable fund balance typically includes inventories, prepaid items, and other items that, by definition cannot be appropriated. The restricted fund balance category includes amounts that can be spent only for the specific purposes stipulated by constitution, external resource providers, or through enabling legislation. • The committed fund balance classification includes amounts that can be used only for the specific purposes determined by a formal action of the City Council. The City Council has authority to establish, modify, or rescind a fund balance commitment. • Amounts in the assigned fund balance classification are intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. The City Administrator or designee has the authority to establish, modify, or rescind a fund balance assignment. ■ Unassigned fund balance is the residual classification for the City's funds and includes all spendable amounts not contained in the other classifications. ❑ The City considers restricted or unrestricted amounts to have been spent when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available. ❑ The City's committed, assigned, or unassigned amounts are considered to have been spent when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which amounts in any of those unrestricted fund balance classifications could be used. APPROPRIATION AUTHORITY ❑ The City Council is the appropriation authority for the City Budget. As required by state law, appropriations expire at the end of each fiscal year. 351 Attachment 2 II :i h ,ai ,II,II III II _ f.r CI TY OF HUNTICVGITol BEACF�I h, I,Ir �I hll II,I,h fill, rl1 - '.II I , _ _,I lnl lyll!; air,:III III IIII f,, 'li: - Illk�la{Irby i } Il�11+1rl7 if Ill���Ilf vl x9 I{ CAPITAL IMPiOfl/EMENT PI?QJIECT�NFQRMAITIO,CIIII I _ ui i0ifliliflIN11 �' h4y�, hl 11 i III PI I f� ='Co,nflnurn Pro-eGt, flllilll°11 iil hr rlllllll!,{IIIs-r.. ,IIhfIAI hII;�I 'I ptl,I,ul,ml II arr PROJECT TITLE Heil Purrt�IS,tation PROJEG DESCRIPTION Construct Heil Pump:'''Station-at new locotidh1lll l I h r, II ,I II,f _ - :,.IIII .I�,+II IIIII ul III Ii,:,,l}ulHi hy�� +vl 1 o�JY1l4Fli 11k f rl Ir+I Relocatlo'ri I aka'lI l� - III I i°,u - I I J [ni-I�.,.�T �I''{ r I - � 'i I f�'lill i I°li - I! - s-r�i�flf Ilr .I'!� rnl If.fart �1�fl III1�1IIIIIIIIiII: _ ��I III�I III II IIII __ Il,ir Illu,� ki,i�ilr r.,.. Il�x 111 ' 'i111}f,'}II " .IIIII1I:IIII Illf Lflll III - M = IIIIIIIp,II II I`111111I l f - 1 1f rtilvYI lil h{!k'r_ x ':IiFfILI II it yl h I. yII I'LI I,II�I I�.:.III +` 1 S rlfl l,I':. �.IGII: Ihi 1 III x.� I+III ,IIII - Il vif'lll},Iliril II:.I ul IIII - - iI _ �111f ,Y�'.' r II III r I I i, .0 Ilhl I.. { flh 1h IfV [, III ;�tIII+ II �I..,- u b lh Ir f IIII = 9 yTlm'fNfl l IIII I nl�}'f III I+ IIIII�+f f _ III Irfill IIIII l iI. _ h�v 4>r�,fr �a}Il.III - 1 IIIIII IIIIII III - f ,I'. IIIII 11i4 - i. rrli i, f I Ii - I� I II I le h - 1, PROJEGT'IINE IED� II I I fhe old um^' statidniis In need 6- rep lacelt>�' rit due to a nd,r' '&V suffiicient illl i I I P ,-Q I h _ P �r. I ge� a Ilfl f caCit II.IIII Ijf�r r I, llrtl l,lf l`{ { f v�I rilrNlil,l llh�l 1 FUNDING DEPARTMENT: r p, yl'I rI II ! y �Ir �,r fki IIIII ��Y III III I111: — 1 I� I,III IIIII I Ill III IIIII I JI 'y tij lVf�v.5 J 4� rr h Public Works T Ir {i�+ i r� 1 �ll�jflllfiil ��,7 IIII , EN :I � i -wDEPT. PROJECT MGR: idI e I I UrI banRundff Mana!gI eIIrI rerltu�,'r-t llf+la'��-r(2005} - €"k}{I�I4fll ll11y1u1r�l �llk l>'i III I,II,IiIIII,II it l �I,II�I hlhll'llllpl ul!�k;i r li P� .!II 11r� l rl if - - rill f 14�I� hl l�+Illlkil - �I�I f1i��,I�I�I114IIlII�i+'ll Jim Wagner II,IIfI d I,l .; IIII - III III Ii r _ IIIIIIipijlh1 f�l 11 STRATEGIC FLAN GOAL. i, If" 1 Alin rove the CI rs�xi °frastructure Approved Expended/Enc. Requested SCHEDULE: PROJECT COSTS Prior FY 14115 FY 15116 FY 16/17 Design Complete: FY 2014/15 Design/Environmental $ 344,300 $ 344,300 Construction Complete: FY 2015/16 Construction $ 1,352,300 $ 2,500,000 Project Management Supplementals Continuing $ 2,352,300 PROJECT LOCATION Other $ 1,000,000 TOTAL $ 2,696,600 $ 2,352,300 $ 2,500,000 FUNDING SOURCES Prior FY 14/15 FY 15116 FY 16/17 Infr Fund $ 2,696,600 $ 344,300 s',M,., �I;IIII'll'll� Other(Haz Mit) $ 2,500,000 Ahxe I�Il�ui° r J':r rt�rll r,�r. � i11�i l i::r r 'I' TOTAL $ 2,696,600 $ 2,500,000 I IN? !. ati-4 W iI MAINTENANCE COST IMPACT: TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 5,196,600 � r i+ I Additional annual cost: None � L x 7+7�fP'II�}il i ull I II , P1fl I igll I y �� �I IIFI ayk�llt 4 I III a ICI Iil�;�glll �i = I li`11111�Ij IiPV,�IMIItiI III II f h l 9�I .; I tPP�tpu 1��k � �4rr�,flf r r+Iflldl IIVL1I COMMENTS ON GRANTS/OTHER FUNDS: l I'I'Y,iJ PROJECT TYPE: New Construction CATEGORY: Draina e Drainage.xisx Heil PS HUNTINGTOI���Bh�AC.l�il IN ,. ,, CA HIM I = . - I Ilzl, �_,r.'-' "'-- u l: I 1 .�,�-{, -- -^ 17 I• ,� -- �,s i< - I � - ---` ""�s f+�rl r fll111 y, � r {114j 1,llr�,l!I�I llaa.l P..LTAL IMPR(�I/L` PN""IIII PROJECT�N � ,I .ATIONI. Jl�,l l r':M::, f II9 ,u,„ hal�llllll �rN„ 'url{ullll,d:,l I,11 =,:' III V IIIY:�f lu,� I pu;l+I', ' _ Conk nu►�hl IuuP�a'ec :71, f,lI�I IIII III il,llll Ifulhl ll Pr.f,.,I_O,. E.,,C".I'6-:I-.T TITILl A.3..•:-t-'::l iaIY..n tae.A. V�:reIa�,�n'I"�u�I iIaI IIr„lI-N:I i II Pll:.l r�o{I Ir q1y e�Yy.r cu,frf..t:W--wai 9 lSl 9 PROJECT DES i rLI 4d.l,r ef oIII,I rI{fIIAI1I I nII II I;t..LLI,,�,Il al,V.:a4-,n d aaI hI akt Ii lrl l I D eIaware +'Aa,I r.[l.�.iI,{°:�{.r:s*"r..-au l h,.�I-'hi.erV.Ir:,.,h"fl{l 4IlfII,r19L,1y:,,b-0n:I 11Ir.Jrl..l.l.,.a:l,:ll„,Itl.I;;-l..l Il lhIII l l I II I II IHI IIIIIlII1I Il IIII�I I.II,u II 4I�,III,�,vn�I'I'r,f"+I«�`"C��'t,.,y•:w IL.,:3:::-sIl,:vL,rIan{:I.":.n 4�,V miII FII 1�g1 14�h1�I I�p1trIa I IIo IIjIIII v{tII II v,II.In IIII rI"I ICIIL II L°IL.SLvI4vl�,h�,r,lVl{- t:l1,.[i,eIp iuesS i El_II+II t.IV...l.Ilir'i.p: r9 :,:a I I o{s,wI I <r„ {II Ih Li f1� r,I,- v lI Il IlII lLlyI"Itl+rI l�Ij:.VI,,Ilu.,l:l:Jl..LfIll I:l,l �- i=-v. .s u,,,l I r IIIII IIIII ul I:! - ':i I I I IIIVI{NI Il.oll�V��i�uL��I I I __ _ I I frl yh{y� �I d��I�l I IIpr I I I I I,I7 IVigI I Iu�Ij11i II�1!ffl IIII hIVI:�:),,; "Thi 11 -irV,I TI III PROJECT NEED: �F s pro�ecis"regiiEel�o meet the:goals of theenela�Il�lldn I , 11 r �'� rill 111 1 IIJ �i+re srI lal b ,.s vl y Il I I hl I :I I J, r. I I v l +.0 ill III I I I I I h:.l III �^r hfl Pi}I I{I II II lyl I r III,IIII"I^., r Vi;II all II IIr -++ Y I,�I{1J rll�h,l llr+rl l��, 11i Illilllll 111 IIIII,{Irr:::ll u'�_ FUNDING DEPARTMENT: ,I III u' '1I� , I ,: II IIIII { I,I{I+�Il�l�rl4ily _.e,g4yl�lrrflf�Irill4 lhl,l I�- - J11I{irLf�dll,�I�H�1'llllll IIII IIII!(({I�Illlldl" _ +vlri,,dlarLll+i V11f411II�I:jJ IIIII IIIII -Public II I fl'll 1 , Sf r'Jt L:'I+ J I, II JII Jv 1141drs llllr I}V IP III,, I = III III liafihl ll�[iilkh4l!L iJ r,! I ,. Il lllrly{f�-u � ..h++✓ril,l�.1;Ilf {{I I II,IJI _ ',r� r���tl IhI III I,II II IIIII DEPT. PROJECT MGR: SOURCE:pOCt11111ENT Gener Iar� Circulation Element Mst �i�d Arteri2l Hi hwa i II"'I."I+PI 4111 rikl.r -,. xr #I{III IIII jI.l�hl l I'I ,r:_ - I� FueIlll IIIlIl'I I�If1%r g J .w^IIsI�III II�,IIy�IILIII•!'',I�III�I IiIo�,r l: Jo Claudio ill I i{ Villa ll ll l hllllll �l{l l IIIul{WS LV 411IIII IdI�I!I�IP I VIII yIIlSlfl�%d��i1 l� '" �,it°Idl il�llllll IIIII fill hllr I rlh-,...- - l IIIII IIII!llfpll�ili l�Il '. III+Ill lllllll jl V IIII StRATEGIC PLAN( (�dl �a�;Iris rove the ft ` y+,h rastr�lG� re M ull°ilfyflili ,l F _ - Approved Expended/Enc. Requested SCHEDULE: PROJECT COSTS Prior FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 Design Complete: FY 2015/16 Design/Environmental $ 396,000 $ 396,000 Construction Complete: FY 2015/16 Construction $ 1,500,000 Project Management $ 50,000 Supplementals $ 50,000 Continuing PROJECT LOCATION Other $ 4,759,364 $ 4,759,364 TOTAL $ 5,155,364 $ 5,155,364 $ 1,600,000 t ' � h I� 1 FUNDING SOURCES Prior FY 14/15 FY 15116 FY 16/17 lot �r PL, zr� I +�{ {IISIJ r �� t N {� - T Measure M $ 600,000 $ 600,000 Traffic Impact Fee(TIF) $ 296,000 $ 296,000 $ 600,000 Infr Fund $ 600,000 $ 600,000 $ 1,000,000 1E t ' nln f Prop 42 $ 1,450,000 $ 1,450,000 "141 °r@pfhi TOTAL $ 5,155,3641 1 $ 1,600,000 y G +r MAINTENANCE COST IMPACT: 11TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 6,755,364 C nY Additional annual cost: None f r �������IIIIIIWI��I�fI�I;I�l�ill��l��l�llhi,u r-,,� �rf ,. ,, is{M J"r �✓� +.� a�f; r��1`�f I,IIIIIIIIh,l llly��.l Yu�� .. V trill a � �JE I � ity itI r,ll4iTf�d{ill�4'�' hI FUND � �I �t�d�ll��l1 II{Illll2�3,206,965,2'i9;�', '1�4 �, � �II�Ir�1III�IIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllll���F� {{ Y Ih�IIh9 L� !"4 [IL4y 1wl - �',u41 I, _ _hh:-lII,Vrr Ill lllllll IIII ll lT 71 r,. COMMENTS ON GRANTS/OTHER FUNDS: PROJECT TYPE: New Construction CATEGORY: Streets Streets&Trans portation.xlsx Atlanta Widening il PROJECT TITLE: Arena Soccer Artificial Tur PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project ih'cludes the replacement,of,the artificiaLturf on-t_he:Atena Soccer Field Replacement field at the H untingtibril,Central Park Sports Complex.'The-turf field Was originallyr installed in 2006 and is significantly worn. Tile average life span of a tort field is 8 ,''years depending on use;;-The arena field is used 7.days a week and ex per eitce, reater wear and teat'0 to the fact the turf isdaid over concrete , u -s PROJECT NEED. The soccer field is used for both Adult league play and Pee Wee.Soccer. FUNDING DEPARTMENT: ' Approximately 540 adult league games with"1400 participants are played Community Services annually, as well as_almost 300 Pee Wees(ages 3{,5); DEPT. PROJECT MGR: SOURCE DOCUMENT:> Huntington Central Park Master Plan Dave Dominguez 01 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: Im'rbVe the Cit 's infrastructure"and Enhance the Qua It of Life SCHEDULE: PROJECT COSTS FY 14115 FY 15116 FY 16/17 FY 17/16 FY 18119 Design Complete: FY 2014/15 Design/Environmental Construction Complete: FY 2014/15 Construction $ 170,000 Project Management Supplementals R/W PROJECT LOCATION Other TOTAL $ 770,000 } } � �� � � FUNDING SOURCES FY 14115 FY 15/16 FY 16117 FY 17/16 FY 18119 Infr Fund $ 170,000 7 �rr TOTAL $ 170,000 MAINTENANCE COST IMPACT: TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 170,000 �V Additional annual cost: None Ir .- PROIECT�QC14Ti0�! ,� " � 1r �� FUND: �,1,il,vr 'w 1314 - � V �' COMMENTS ON GRANTS/OTHER FUNDS: � � r 1 r � � wr, f, r' Project cost is estimated. PROJECT TYPE: Rehabilitation CATEGORY: Parks &Beaches Parks & Beaches.xlsx Arena Soccer Field - = i, I, - rll 1.{11 III v,l : rrn llylri u _ - CITY OIFIHU�ITINGTON B�A�H I " ` "p CAP�TA'L;IMPROVENI EI11 T I �OJECT/11►�OI41VI/I IIII N: I,FI II'`4'rIII'II'I it t,,,,,?IIi '�';Irllll III 11141II IIII II�IILI�191�II III , {IIII' r III IILI.I II I,I,..IIIIIIIII r�l 141111IL,.Ihll1 ,IN.�j. T a,l III u I Contintrih IIPi�o'ecfi „1111,,11 111 911�hII,III IIh�l PROJECT TITLE. Pedestrian Crossfn�Jat PROJECT DESCRIPTION. This.p,tblactllw,oufc�provi11I,I IN de a pedestrlalf�Io�blssir�g between the �a�lla Terra acid Bella'Terra/Boart(walk _ I! Boardwalk prp�ects;Illdppromote pedestriah mobl(itj�.l;:'Ir,,he crossing V✓buldlti "ro,Vide-' safe access across ari'Ilxitilg,railroad and flood ctir�rolrchannel. l ;'JII ITlkrlll'll` II, ,11"I r ru+E - I s�� - TI IiSI1lI1II s�k1 L„4. ,a' II Ilt � v 1�1'll l hill I'' J Illr:'I III IIIIII L. ',�t�`I I, ,III II Irk,,ui ril =IIII 1411111 I�. _ IIII Il jlllll rll �� IIII II � IN ., I i1 I Ih�I II _ IIIII II III - v I IIII - r II IllI IIII Il,x ` IIti v dl�N� I u I ' I{Q I..1 1 II PROJECT NEED To romate.y�ed 5tnah mobilit , between�helBd�l Terra and Boardwalk projects. I II IIII III II I�.,:..r�' p F'� .11 � - I I I�I I11VII I �4�1'�, IIII�II II IhII la I d. _ T e sect Is' u ded{ie hall '�b each Devela er FUNDING DEPARTMENT: - 111 III I � h project f h �' r 1 I I vl r4 III V ' Il t�v o I IiyI� IIII lllp IU VLI r '� to V1 - le 4 111 h�lll li Public Works = III _ - I - Ilf Ili I1 J �lll�i IIII I,IH,pIIry VYII..klk ti�{R r' DEPT. PROJECT MGR: SOURCE DOCUMENT. ll��lrIII II,�I �I IIII ry �Iil�l II Todd Broussard r II �II� � , 'I':- I ".I rll II ILII II 5Kh)`III I���III STRATEGIC PL'AK OAL. Im rb'VO!"lthe°,Ci 's infrastructUre� �'�. ,^,�,� kl,rl„Pw I� -� I,°rl'INIII A2proved Expended/Enc. Requested SCHEDULE: PROJECT COSTS Prior FY 14115 FY 15116 FY 16/17 Design Complete: FY 2014/15 Design/Environmental $ 200,000 $ 100,000 Construction Complete: FY 2015/16 Construction $ 250,000 Project Management $ 25,000 Supplementals $ 25,000 Continuing $ 100,000 PROJECT LOCATION Other TOTAL $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000 T s FUNDING SOURCES Prior FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16117 F Developer $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000 I 1 1 is 1.lw S tF h %9 tivv TOTAL $ 200,0001 1 1 $ 300,000 - MAINTENANCE COST IMPACT: ITOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 500,000 Banrxdvrcpllk i - Additional annual cost: None .t�µ - �' r II III III I I 41hI II Ilj IIIII I �, I � , I IIIII IIII,,I,II, III�1111 11 ��, 9 FUND 3l4 ill II �.=1+rr IIII iIv = rffl F' - COMMENTS ON GRANTS/OTHER FUNDS: PROJECT TYPE: New Construction J , CATEGORY: Neighborhood Neigh borhood.xlsx Ped Xing CIITY,OFHUNTIN'GTON:BEACH „=,,;I - L'rlrllkll,h'l"IIII1,iIllll'uIIII'1 pin l_I h- !I�Ivr ire .r Ivv.LII _ +jlyl ill IIIII l�Ill lll�Il�IIIII I� L.CAPITAL INIPRQI11%EMENT PRO:�E°CT;lNFORMArl011fIII III��I,� , �I::- �, , I�iIIglill'171 I =,�,.,�, llu�!'�IIId l{II,h.L{ I1.1 N Ila I� I � r I I I I � fl Sr 'r = irk r I I d l I I.o'I IIII iP11,11 '�t r iIII,I „I ,Continuln Pro`a�t�r �.�� ,I,I II II II .Id, ,I,1� PROJECT TI'�d ,. II "I1I ; l I l t t'I IfTLE e �'Senorene O ESRPTION Com letion of oonstuctioh Plans sped oatiosand contrucoY1bIna knn dew � hingtol CentralPark and eo b letion ofaneh'hIa is senior centerin, y, ` f I y = taptor,foraging hac to,Icorpply With mitigatlohlimeasures for the°piolecti, - �+ }IIII nrll ;`'?If�l Ill ail. l iil III! - II v�ll lil _ I Ih I!III I � "I 14x4111 r-a:,� ,. I{II II vll,l 4 I - '. I,O IIIII, i IIIII III VIII1 dF PROJECT NEED:- ,.' The curtelht Senior Center at 1#7th1%tl eefl,and OrangeAvo �o'lis Undersized tb', _ r` Il r .+ ya, V III - I'I IIII - FUNDING DEPARTMENT: r I, effectively se �ttel re ,heeds of the groWin is,ehior:poputation vII ld IIIIIII 1.,,IIIIII, - v u III 1 rIJ III III II III u,��r° programming spa el,islllttleeded to adequate�y'serue t>7e public. '', li'III'I';I''i Community Services �I { III _ V ��� S �I lY}kJl�ll�l Ill DEPT. PROJECT MGR: SOURCE DOCUMENT HuhtingToh Beach IS6hiot�ICenter Feasibility Stud 'ii 2007; Masten „I,IIFhIIIGI IIIII Dave Dominguez �I L' c��ities Plan April 2012,' II � I', �rA'Irlr� �Inr'�I,�;�;III�IIII f in f [ �'-: — I v� �r 1 I I', ry l,il l'Ii I� - 1°I III III! STRATEGIC PLAN bt A s: Im roVe?lthe Cit s infrastructureaaiidIE:'lih Qualtt bf'L�fe,11 Approved Expended/Enc. Requested SCHEDULE: PROJECT COSTS Prior FY 14/15 FY 15116 FY 16117 Design Complete: FY 2014/15 Design/Environmental $ 420,065 $ 288,950 Construction Complete: FY 2015/16 Construction $ 1,614,000 $ 18,875,000 Project Management $ 650,000 Supplementals $ 475,000 Continuing $ 1,745,115 PROJECT LOCATION Other TOTAL $ 2,034,065 $ 288,950 $ 21,745,115 ,,. FUNDING SOURCES Prior FY 14115 FY 15116 FY 16/17 R1 General Fund($2m Res,$1m New) $ 3,000,000 InfrFund $ 1,500,000 $ 1,000,000 ':— l PA &D(Park Fees) $ 300,000 $ 197,385 HUD EDI#90 and#130 Grants $ 234,065 $ 91,565 Donations $ 2,000,000 T 1 Potential Bond/Other Financing $ 15,000,000 TOTAL $ 2,034,065 $ 21,000,000 ° MAINTENANCE COST IMPACT: 11TOTAL PROJECT COST: $23,034,065 I ' Additional annual cost: None o 1 r r �- �II � � � _. �'Y - - I IIIII Ila � �j1,1�{I111filI IIIII I� IIIIII II II : �✓ .{� '� v a�i�'vl.� - I I IIII IIIIIII+F ifi MY 1I� COMMENTS ON GRANTS/OTHER FUNDS: Staff is researching potential bond financing.$1 m GF PROJECT TYPE: New Construction (new) is for payment of Bonding Debt Service. CATEGORY: Parks&Beaches Parks& Beaches.xlsx Senior Center