HomeMy WebLinkAboutMaster Facilities Plan - Prepared by Revenue & Cost Speciali Master .facilities Flan
for the City of
Huntington Beach, California
October, 2011
Copyright, 2009, 2010&2011 by Revenue& Cost Specialists, L.L.C.
All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon
may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means --graphic,
electronic, mechanical, including any photocopying, recording, taping or
taping or information storage and retrieval systems without written permission
of-
Revenue& Cost Specialists, L.L.C.
1519 East Chapman Avenue, Suite C
Fullerton, CA 92831
(714)992-9020 SUPPLEMENTAL
COMMUNICATION
M"ing Date:
Agenda item No. � �
i evenue
®St
pecialis$S, LLCa
Serving Local Governments Since 1975
October 17, 2011
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Via Mr. Fred Wilson, City Manager
City of Huntington Beach - City Hall
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
RE. City of Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan
Honorable Mayor, City Council, and City Manager Wilson,
The following Document, the proposed Master Facilities Plan(MFP)is hereby submitted for City
Council review and consideration. The proposed MFP is the result of many hours of work
between City staff and Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. staff. This document represents a
long-range program of identification and recognition of the entirety of infrastructure and physical
needs necessary to meet the service demands of an ever-growing residential population and
business community. The information included in this proposed MFP identifies capital needs
throughout the community and is primarily based on the numerous elements of the Huntington
Beach Comprehensive General Plan, it's many elements, Master Plans and other official
documents.
The City's five-year Capital Improvement Plan and the proposed development impact fees will be
a function of the entire list of proposed projects listed in this document. Stated in a slightly
different way, the list of projects contained herein needs to be agreed to by the City Council in
order to increase the validity of both of the two above mentioned documents.
This Master Facilities Plan contains the following:
e A Table of Contents
A Guide to the Master Facilities Plan
® A Project Summary schedule
• A section containing all Law Enforcement capital needs
s A section containing all of the Fire SuppressionlMedic capital needs
® A section containing all of the:Streets, Bridges and Signals projects
• A section containing all of the Storm Drainage'System improvements
• A section containing the ft ture'P&lic"L;ibramand Collection expansion needs.
Intcrnet: www.revenue cost com
Voice 714.992.9020_ 1519,E. Chapman P,ve%iue:•"Suite.C Pull rton, CA 92831_ ,. F 714.9.92,9621..' "
Page Two, October 11, 2011 MFP Letter to the City of Huntington Beach
® A section containing all of the Community Use Facilities projects.
® A section containing all of the Park Land Acquisition and Development of
Recreation Facilities projects.
In addition to the efforts of Bob Hall, Deputy City Manager in coordinating the flow of
information, the following staff were instrumental in identifying the required projects:
M. Todd Broussard, P.E.- Principal Civil Engineer (Storm Drainage)
David C. Dominguez -Facilities Development and Concessions Manager
Eric G. Enberg -Division ChieflFire Operations
Jim B. Engle Community Services Director
Kevin Justen,- Senior Administrative Analyst-Fire
Tung M. Kao -Info Systems Specialist
Darrin Maresh, Fire Development Specialist
Tony Olmos - City Engineer
Jerry Thompson - General Services Manager
Bill Reardon - Fire MarshalllDivision Chief
Dan Richards - Customer SupportlGlS Manager
Bob Stachelski - Transportation Manager
Chuck Thomas - Police Captain
Jerry Thompson - General Services Manager
Bob Mngenroth -Director of Finance
RCS appreciates the efforts of the listed staff and any others whose efforts RCS may have been
unaware of for their assistance in generating the information provided within this Master Facilities
Plan, and we look forward to meeting with the City Council in order to implement and achieve
maximum use this comprehensive report.
Sincerely,
SCOTT THORPE
Vice President
City of Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Table of Contents
Guide to Master Facilities Plan i-vi
Master Facilities Plan Cost Summary - All Projects
...... xnt. ..... .
Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost Summary 5
LE-00 I Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space 6
LE-002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles 7
LE-003 Acquire Additional Sworn Office Issued Equipment 8
LE-004 Acquire Law Enforcement Specialty Equipment 9
Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost Summary 11
FS-001 Relocate Station #8 (Heil) 12
FS-002 Construct Station #8 (Heil) Apparatus Storage Facility 13
FS-003 Construct a Single Bay/Quarters at Station #4 (Magnolia) 14
FS-004 Acquire an Engine Company and Ambulance for Station #4 (Magnolia 15
FS-005 Acquire an Engine Company for Station #1 (Gothard) 16
FS-006 Acquire an Engine Company for Station #2 (Murdy) 17
irc f
,C 1""" .........MOM.,
Circulation (Streets, Bridges and Signals) System Cost Summary 19
ST-001 Beach Boulevard and Edinger Avenue 2.1
ST-002 Beach Boulevard and Heil Avenue 22
ST-003 Beach Boulevard and Warner Avenue 23
ST-004 Beach Boulevard and Slater Avenue 24
ST-005 Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue 25
ST-006 Beach Boulevard and Garfield Avenue 26
ST-007 Beach Boulevard and Yorktown Avenue 27
ST-008 Pacific Coast Highway and Warner Avenue 28
ST-009 Pacific Coast Highway and Goldenwest Street 29
ST-010 Pacific Coast Highway and Brookliurst Street 30
ST-01 1 Goldenwest Street and Bolsa Avenue 31
ST-012 Goldenwest Street and Slater Avenue 32
ST-013 Newland Street and Talbert Avenue 33
ST-014 Newland Street and Warner Avenue 34
ST-0 15 Newland Street and Yorktown Avenue 35
ST-016 Gothard Street and Slater Avenue 36
ST-017 Gothard. Street and Talbert Avenue 37
City of Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Table of Contents
ST-018 Ward Street and Garfield Avenue 38
ST-019 Brookliurst Street and Adams Avenue 39
ST-020 Miscellaneous Traffic Signals/Intersection Improvements 40
ST-021 Public Works Maintenance Building 41
ST-022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles 42
...........
Mw:
Storm Drainage Collection System Cost Summary 44
SD-001 Santa Ana River & Talbert Channel Region (SD Region #1) 45
SD-002 Coastal and Bolsa Chica.Wetlands Region (SD Region #2) 46
SD-003 Slater Channel Region (SD Region #3) 47
SD-004 Wintersburg Channel Region (SD Region #4) 48
SD-005 Bolsa Chica Channel & Harbour Region (SD Region #5) 49
SD-006 Public Works Maintenance Building so
..........
N
..........
Public Library Facilities and Collection. Cost Summary
PL-001 Expand Banning Library 53
PL-002 Expand Main Street Library 54
PL-003 Expand Library Collection Items 55
. ...........
. . .......
..........
Community Use Facilities Cost Summary 57
CF-001 Central Park Senior Center 58
CF-002 Edison Community Center Gymnasium 59
CF-003 Murdy Community Center Gymnasium 60
CF-004 Oak View Recreation Center Expansion 61
.. ..................
A
X.
Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Cost Summary 63
PK-001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan and EIR 65
PK-002 Irby Park Phase 11 66
PK-003 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR, RAP and Development 67
PK-004 Le Bard Park Expansion Master Plan and Development plan 68
PK-005 Blufftop Park Trail Improvements 69'
PK-006 Edinger Dock Development 70
PK-007 Wardlow Field Reconfiguration Design/Construction 71
PK-008 City-Wide Parks Master Plan 72
City of Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Table of Contents
PK-009 Central Park Habitat Plan 73
PK-010 Central Park Acquisiton of Encyclopedia Lots 74
PK-011 Central Park Development of Remaining 86 Acres 75
PK-012 Central Park Rebuild Two Restaurant Facilities 76
PK-013 General Youth Sports Facilities Grants 77
PK-014 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase II 78
PK-015 Beach Playground 79
PK-016 Central Park Development of Former Gun Range 80
PK-017 Warner Dock Renovation and Expansion 81
PK-018 Lamb Park Design and Development 82
PK-019 Central Park Sports Complex Team Room 83
PK-020 Future Parks Acquisition (Possible Closed School Sites) 84
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
GUIDE TO THE MASTER FACILITIES PLAN
The Master Facilities Plan is a compilation of projects identified by City staff as being needed for
the City of Huntington Beach through theoretical General Plan build-out of the City. The Plan is
based on input from City staff,recommended projects contained in the City's several Master Plans
for infrastructure and an occasional recommendation from RCS staff.
The Master Facilities Plan generally provides for three major types of projects. The first group
of projects provides for the maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the City's varied
infrastructure, including its streets, storm drains and other public facilities. These projects
represent a very small portion of the needed replacement of the City's fixed assets identified at
more than$1.435 million of depreciable fixed assets which are being consumed, conservatively,
at an annual rate of just over $19.1 million, (assuming a conservative 75 year infrastructure
lifetime). The $1.435 billion figure excludes owned park land, not subject to depreciation, at
$678.2 million. The following table indicates the replacement values of the various infrastructure
owned by the City.
Table MFP-1
Replacement Value of Existing Infrastructure
Infrastructure Replacement Value
Law Enforcement $71,246,699
Fire Suppression/Medic $61,234,227
Circulation System(1) $533,539,375
Storm Drainage System(1) $203,631,313
Library Space/Collection $76,593,112
Community Use Centers $56,649,600
Park Improvements $432,133,770
Total $1,435,028,096
(1)Does not include millions of dollars owned in land right-of-way and
Excludes "local" facilities, those limited to neighborhood facilities.
The second group of projects are needed to serve future development and include such projects
as widening of streets, creation of additional parkland or construction of a new fire station. These
projects are proposed to be funded through the development impact fees recommended in the
companion to this document called Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for City
of Huntington Beach.
i
Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan
The last group of projects are proposed to enhance the quality of life for all City residents and spur
economic growth in the community. These projects include the construction of a community
centers, libraries and parks that expand the existing level of service.
Goal of the Master Facilities Plan. The Master Facilities Plan is not intended to be the final word
on capital improvement projects needed for the City, but rather a starting point for discussions
between policy-makers (i.e., the City Council), City management staff and the public prior to the
formulation of a Five-or Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The Master Facilities Plan
begins the process of identifying all growth-related capital projects required to accommodate new
City development through General Plan build-out. This document, as all capital improvement
programs should be, is rooted in the philosophy that for the document to have any meaningful
value to future residents and staff members, it must be constantly updated and revised as new
legislation is adopted and as the environment and the City itself changes over the years.
In short, the Master Facilities Plan is intended as a fluid, not static, document. Thus, it is
essential that periodic updates be performed to add new projects or delete completed or no longer
needed projects.
The Master Facilities Plan represents the starting point for fulfillment of the following purposes:
Planning - The Plan implements the standards and goals contained in the City's General
Plan when applicable and proposes improvement projects which are constructed and
located in conformance with the General Plan.
Financial Planning - A Facilities Plan or CIP should consider the scheduling and
availability of financing sources in order to achieve an orderly and comprehensive process.
Individual project descriptions in this document detail the project's relationship to other
recommended improvements and other scheduling constraints. This effort should always
be a high priority of the City in order to insure that efforts between departments are
coordinated and to avoid construction made more costly by duplication of construction
efforts (Le, a water pipe installed one year after a road is constructed).
A sound capital planning process can also help to rationally plan projects for the purposes
of long-term financing. Taxpayers can accrue savings when capital financing is
coordinated such that long-term financing can be sized and timed to achieve the lowest
possible financing costs.
Budgeting--The following projects should provide the outline for preparation of the Five-
Year Capital Improvement Plan in the future. The first year of the CIP then is incorpo-
rated into the City's Annual Budget. Note: the scope of services did not include the
ii
Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan
identification of what year the projects will be needed therefore the project costs default
to the last column.
Master Facilities Planning Process. The Master Facilities Plan represents an interdepartmental
effort to identify needed projects through the theoretical point of build-out of the City.
Management staff was then asked to allocate projects as a first step towards prioritizing all projects
for the Plan. Criteria considered by the management team in evaluating projects included:
® Does the project generate operating savings or otherwise enhance the ability of the
department to deliver services?
® Did the project reduce or eliminate safety or health hazards?
• Was the project needed to provide adequate levels of service to future residents or prevent
deterioration of service to existing residents?
® Was the project recommended in any of the City's engineering or planning Master Plans,
the Corporate Plan or any other adopted City document?
® Did the project have a significant positive effect on the community?
Funding Analysis. The following summary section of this Plan includes a projection of historical
and potential revenue sources for the financing of the listed capital improvement projects.
Development impact fee revenues were estimated based on the proposed rates recommended in
the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report. For the purposes of this Report it was
assumed that development will occur evenly over the period of build-out for the City.
Other revenue sources were projected based on discussions with City staff, but are shown only for
informational purposes. Given the magnitude of costs shown in this Report, RCS recommends
that a more detailed financial strategy for construction of these improvements (i.e., a Capital
Financing Plan) be conducted by the City within the immediate future. Such a document would
seek to further identify and quantify potential financing sources for the City.
It should be noted that the Master Facilities Plan emphasizes the total capital needs of the City,
in contrast to the more traditional Capital Improvement Program approach which places more of
an emphasis on reducing total needs to only reasonably assured revenue sources. The process of
further scheduling projects on a year-to-year basis should continue onward during the Capital
Improvement Program process.
Organization of the Master Facilities Plan. The Master Facilities Plan is divided into eight major
sections, according to the category of capital improvement. Each will ultimately be quantified as
iii
Guide to the Huntington Peach Master Facilities Plan
a separate development impact fee in the companion document. The eight types of improvements
are:
Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment - These are projects needed for
the City's Police Department, including expansion of the Police Station and acquisition of
additional communication equipment and response vehicles.
Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities and Response Vehicles - This program includes
facilities necessary to accommodate new development support with the existing level of
service provided by the City's Fire Department. This section contains the need for one fire
station relocation, expansion of second, construction of additional vehicle storage space
and a number of additional response apparatus.
Circulation(streets,bridges and signals)System-These projects consists of future street
additional traffic signals and intersection improvements.
Storm Drainage Collection System-These projects include the construction of new storm
drain lines, channels and other facilities for the purposes of storm drainage.
Public Library Facilities and Collection-This program provides for the expansion of the
City-owned library facilities. The project consists of the building expansion and expansion
of the collection inventory.
Community Use Facilities - This project includes the construction of a
community/recreation centers for classes, meetings and other general public uses.
Park Land Acquisition and Park Facilities Development-The acquisition and develop-
ment of new parks, the construction of recreational facilities for the City and improvement
of existing undeveloped parklands are accomplished through this program. It also includes
open space acquisition.
At the beginning of each of these sections is a summary of projects in that category and proposed
project cost. Next, is an individual project description for each project submitted, detailing the
proposed scope of the project, the submitting department, justification and listing of related
projects.
The table on the following page indicates the total project expenditures ($403,399,086) identified
as necessary through build-out. Some of this amount, about $22.3 million would be financed by
other revenues or government agencies.
iv
Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan
Table MFP-2
Cost of Future Infrastructure
Infrastructure Project Totals
Law Enforcement Facilities, et. al. $10,100,895
Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities et. al. $11,941,972
Circulation (Streets/Bridges/Signals) $28,537,800
Storm Drainage Collection System $207,494,050
Library Facilities/Collection $7,841,369
Community Use Centers $28,750,000
Park Land Acquisition & Improvements $108,733,000
Total $403,399,086
Fairness and reason(as well as the more important State and Federal statutes and court decisions)
dictate that not all of the projects will qualify for development impact fee funding (i.e. some
projects are replacements or service level increasing, etc.). If the City adopts the development
impact fees that represent the General Plan Build-out need-based impact fees (Schedule 2.1 in the
companion Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report), 42.6% of the required
funding(or$172.1 million)would be raised with development impact fees. Existing Development
Impact Fee Fund balances of$3.6 million will provide 0.9% of the total project funding and other
sources (inter-governmental support) will finance 5.7% ($23.0 million) This leaves 50.8%, or
$204.8 million of the total project costs as unfunded, to be financed by other sources such as fees,
rates, existing taxes or voter approved additional taxes, inter-governmental transfers and the rare
occasional grant.
Relationship to Development !=act Fee Report. The Master Facilities Plan was prepared in
conjunction with the City's Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, also prepared
by RCS, LLC. Projects listed in the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report
correspond to projects found in this document and contain the same numbering sequence as the
Master Facilities Plan. The Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report is also
contains eight chapters specific to each one of these infrastructure sections according to the same
category of projects described on the previous page.
Thus,a reader who wants to find more information on Law Enforcement Project No.1 (Additional
Law Enforcement Facility Space found on Schedule 3.1 of the Development Impact Fee
v
Guide to the Huntington Beach Master Facilities Plan
Calculation and Nexus Report may turn to Project No. LE-001 of the Master Facilities Plan. For
readers of the Master Facilities Plan who wish to understand the determination of development
impact fee financing more fully, refer to the Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus
Report, Chapter One.
Vi
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Master Project List Total Thru
G.P.Build-00
LS001 Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space $7,597,165
LE002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles $1,751,040
LE003 Acquire Additional Sworn Officer Issued Equipment $327,690
LE004 Acquire Law Enforcement Specialty Equipment $425,000
FS001 Relocate Fire Station #8 (Heil) $7,169,470
FS002 Construct Station #8(Heil)Apparatus Storage Facility $1,716,044
FS003 Construct A Single Bay/Quarters At Station#4 (Magnolia) $1,266,458
FS004 Acquire An Engine And Ambulance For Station#4 (Magnolia) $740,000
FS005 Acquire An Additional Engine For Station#1 (Gothard) $525,000
FS006 Acquire An Additional Engine For Station#2 (Murdy) $525,000
LGO01 Beach Boulevard And Edinger Avenue $600,000
LGO02 Beach Boulevard And Heil Avenue $1,000,000
LGO03 Beach Boulevard And Warner Avenue $400,000
LG004 Beach Boulevard And Slater Avenue $500,000
LGO05 Beach Boulevard And Talbert Avenue $1,000,000
LGO06 Beach Boulevard And Garfield Avenue $1,000,000
LGO07 Beach Boulevard And Yorktown Avenue $500,000
LGO08 Pacific Coast Highway And Warner Avenue $2,000,000
LGO09 Pacific Coast Highway And Goldenwest Street $750,000
LGO10 Pacific Coast Highway And Brookhurst Street $750,000
LG011 Goldenwest Street And Bolsa Avenue $500,000
LGO12 Goldenwest Street And Slater Street $50,000
LG013 Newland Street And Talbert Avenue $500,000
LGO14 Newland Street And Warner Avenue $30,000
LGO15 Newland Street And Yorktown Avenue $300,000
V: 1.33.0 Date:11/11/2011 Time: 2:17 PM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 1
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Master Project List Total Thru
G.P.Build-Out
LG016 Gothard Street And Slater Avenue $500,000
LG017 Gothard Street And Talbert Avenue $264,000
LGO18 Ward Street And Garfield Avenue $.8,800
LGO19 Brookhurst Street And Adams Avenue $10,000,000
LG020 Miscellaneous Traffic Signal/Intersection Improvements $5,000,000
LG021 Public Works Maintenance Building $2,820,000
LG022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles $65,000
SDO01 Santa Ana River&Talbert Channel Region (SD Region#1) $23,728,000
SDO02 Coastal And Bolsa Chica Wetlands Region (SD Region#2) $21,527,000
SDO03 Slater Channel Region (SD Region#3) $34,236,000
SDO04 Wintersburg Channel Region (SD Region#4) $28,749,000
SDO05 Bolsa Chica Channel & Harbour Region (SD Region#5) $98,549,000
SDO06 Public Works Maintenance Building $705,050
PL-001 Expand Banning Branch Library $5,268,470
PL-002 Expand Main Street Branch Library $1,651,375
PL-003 Expand Library Collection Items $921,524
CF-001 Central Park Senior Center $22,000,000
CF002 Edison Community Center Gymnasium $2,975,000
CI`003 Murdy Community Center Gymnasium $2,975,000
CF004 Oak View Recreation Center Expansion $800,000
PK001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan And EIR $5,400,000
PK002 Irby Park Phase 11 $500,000
PK003 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR, RAP And Development $4,325,000
PK004 Le Bard Park Expansion Master Plan And Development Plan $1,450,000
PK005 Blutftop Park Trail Improvements $1,000,000
V:1.33.0 Date:11/11/2011 Time: 2:17 PM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 2
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Master Project List Total Thru
G.P.Build-Out
PK006 Edinger Dock Development $700,000
PK007 Wardlow Field Reconfiguration Design/Construction $1,000,000
PK008 City-Wide Parks Master Plan $350,000
PK009 Central Park Habitat Plan $250,000
PK010 Central Park Acquisiton Of Encyclopedia Lots $1,020,000
PK011 Central Park Development Of Remaining 86 Acres $20,000,000
PK012 Central Park Rebuild Two Restaurant Facilities $800,000
PK013 General Youth Sports Facilities Grants $39,600,000
PK014 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase II $2,500,000
PK015 Beach Playground $350,000
PK016 Central Park Development Of Former Gun Range Area $3,000,000
PK017 Warner Dock Renovation And Expansion $800,000
PK018 Lamb Park Design And Development $1,100,000
PK019 Central Park Sports Complex Team Room $100,000
PK020 Future Parks Acquisition (Possible Closed School Sites) $24,488,000
Total All Projects $403,399,086
V: 1.33.0 Date:11/11/2011 Time: 2:17 PM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 3
City of Huntington Beach
Lava Enforcement Facilities,
Vehicles and Equipment
4
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment
2015-16
Through Project Build
2011 -12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Build Out Out Total
FS-001 Relocate Fire Station 98(Hefl) $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,169,470 $7,169,470
FS-002 Construct Station#8(Heil)Apparatus Storage Facility $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,716,044 $1,716,044
FS-003 Construct A Single BaylQuarters At Station#4(Magnolia) $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,265,458 $1,266,458
FS-004 Acquire An Engine And Ambulance For Station#4(Magnolia) $0 $0 $0 $0 $740,000 $740,000
FS-005 Acquire An Additional Engine For Station#1(Gothard) $0 $0 $0 $0 $525,000 $525,000
FS-006 Acquire An Additional Engine For Station#2(Murdy) $0 $0 $0 $0 $525,000 $525,000
TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,941,972 $11,941,972
Notes:
1)If project timing is not a component of this effort,then all projects default to their"Thru Build Out'amount.
V:1.12.0 Date: 11/01/2011 Time:12:06 PM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 1
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Law Enforcement Facilities,Vehicles And Equipment
Project Number./Title LE 001 Additional Law Enforcement Facility Space
Submitting Departments: Police Department
Project Description:
Acquire land(or replacement land is placed at City Hall)for and construct 12 041 square feet of law enforcement space. The department will
need to hire an additional 33 sworn officers at General Plan build-out to accommodate the additional 14.6%(8,697)in calls-far-service
demand over the current 59,479 annual calls-for-service. Roughly 249 of these would be to the beach area. The additional space could be in
the main station or could be located elsewhere in the City.The space would be necessaryto expand,patrol,investigation,traffic control or any
of the many specialty support services such as communications or records.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
Annuallythe City currently experiences roughly 61,285 calls-for-sevice,97.05%of which are from privately-held properties within the City`s
limits. The land-use database indicates the addition of 7,065 residential dwellings,1,353 commercial lodging rooms and 7.3 million square
feet of additional business(commercial,office and industrial)space which will generate,on average,an additional 8,448 annual
calls-tor-service,or a 14.6%increase. While the existing station is adequate to meetthe current needs,the addition of 34 sworn officers will
generate the need for a proportionally greater amount of space.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The project primarily addresses additional calls-for-service from new development(97.05%)and thus is allocated 97.05%to new General
Plan development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 97.05%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project timing would be dependent upon both the rate of development and collection of Development Impact Fees.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 568,524,00 568,524.00
2. Land Acquisition!Right Of Way 0.00 a.00 0.0o 0.00 1,033,801.00 1,033,801.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,173,493.00 6,173,493.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 309,604.00 309,604.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 511,743.00 511,743.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,597,165.00 7,697,165.00
6
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/1412011 Time:12:47 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Law Enforcement Facilities,Vehicles And Equipment
Project Number:/Title LE 002 Acquire Additional Response Vehicles
Submitting Departments: Police Department
Project Description:
Acquire thirty-two additional response or specialty vehicles at an average cost of$54,720 each in orderto maintain the existing ratio of 0.98
vehicles per officer. Approximately 97.05 fo of these vehicles are required to serve private sector development.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The Department currently has 231 law enforcement vehicles that are used by the 235 sworn officers creating an existing standard of 0.96
vehicles per sworn officer. With that the addition of 33 officers needed to respond to the annual calls-for-service likely to be generated by
future General Plan development the Citywlll need to acquire an additional 32 vehicles in orderto maintain the 0.96 ratio ofvehicle per sworn
officer,Failure to maintain the current ratio ofvehciels per officer could reduce the City's abilityto maintain beat strength and would certainly
accelerate vehilce turnover.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The acquisition addresses onlythe future additional calls-far-service from General Plan new development andthus is allocated 97.05 percent
to new development
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 97.05%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projeettiming would be dependent upon bath the rate of development and collection of Development Impact Fees.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 U0
2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment l Other 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,751,040.00 1,751,040.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,751,040.00 1,751,040.00
7
V:1 M.0 Date:10114/2011 Time:12:50 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Law Enforcement Facilities,Vehicles And Equipment
Project Number:/Title LE 003 Acquire Additional Sworn Officer Issued Equipment
Submitting Departments: Police Department
Project Description:
Acquire additional equipment assigned to the additional 33 sworn officers necessary to accommodate General Plan development. The
capitalized list of equipment includes(but is not limited to):a protective vest handgun,baton,compliment of leathers,handcuffs-uniforms,
helmet raincoat and heavy duty flashlight. The costs,at$9,930 includes anominal background check medical/physical check and
polygraph exam for the sucessful candidates.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The equipment and related costs ar necessary for an officerto function in the field. The list is mostly safety equipment but also includes the
costs absorbed by the City in identifying an appropriate candidate. Roughly 97.05%of the required new officers would be necessaryto serve
new General Plan development.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The project primarily addresses additional calls-for-service from new development(97.05%)and thus is allocated 97.05%to new General
Plan development
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 97.05%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projecttimingwould be dependent upon both developmentand collection of development impactfees.
2016-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 OM
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 327,690.00 327,690.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 327,690.00 327,690.00
8
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/1412011 Time:12:56 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Law Enforcement Facilities,Vehicles And Equipment
Project Number:t Title LE 004 Acquire Law Enforcement Specialty Equipment
Submitting Departments: Police Department
Project Description:
Acquire specialty equipment to supportthe additional 33 officers needed to accommodate new development. Approximately 97%of that
figure are needed to accommodate new development of private property.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The amount and type of crime is ever increasing. The Citywill need to acquire additional information-sharing computer capacity as well as
specialty equipment such as bikes,dogs,hand-held radios,etc.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The project primarily addresses additional calls-for-service from new development(97.05%)and thus is allocated 97.05%to new General
Plan development.
Allocation To General Pan Buildout: 97.05%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project timing would be dependent upon both development and collection of development impactfees.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 425,000.00 425,000.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 425,000.00 425,000.00
9
0
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/11/2011 Time: 2:26 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
City of Huntington Beach
Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities,
Vehicles and Equipment
10
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities, Vehicles And Equipment
2015-16
Through Project Build
2011 -12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Build Out Out Total
FS-001 Relocate Fire Station#8(Heil) $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,169,470 $7,169,470
FS-002 Construct Station#8(Heil)Apparatus Storage Facility $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,716,044 $1,718,044
FS-003 Construct A Single Bay/Quarters At Station#4(Magnolia) $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,266.458 $1,266,458
FS-004 Acquire An Engine And Ambulance For Station#4(Magnolia) $0 $0 $0 $0 $740,000 $740,000
FS-005 Acquire An Addition Engine For Station#1(Gothard) $0 $0 $0 $0 $525,000 $526,000
FS-006 Acquire An Addition Engine For Station#2(Murdy) $0 $0 $0 $0 $525,000 $525,000
TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,941,972 $11,941,972
Notes:
1)If project timing is not a component of this effort,then all projects default to their"Thru Build Out"amount.
V:1.12.0 Date: 10/10/2011 Time: 5:38 PM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 1
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities,Vehicles And Equipment
Project Number./Title FS 001 Relocate Fire Station#8(Heil)
Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description:
Relocate Station#8 from its current location on Heil Avenue just west of Springets Street to a more northerly area near Graham Street just
north of Edinger Street. The proposed 11,350 square foot facilitywould be a be a five vehicle configuration and would require roughly 1.25
acres. The facilitywould be capable of housing up to three companies and battalion chief. The facility would provide 3,550 square feet of
vehicle bay space,1,290 square feet of mechanicalAechnical space,6,150 square feet of living quarters consisting of(a maximum of 24)
bunks,lockers,restrooms/showers,a physical training room,kitchen,dining and a dayrocm. The parcel is also planned to house a reserve
apparatus storage facility(see FD-002).
Justification j Consequences of Avoidance:
The forty-five year-old station,once state-of-the-art has numerous limitations in addition to mere aging.In addition to asbestos removal
needs,the station design does not allow for mixed gender accommodation or the assignment of an aerial response truck. Since the station
needs to be reconstructed,relocation more northerly,about 1,25 miles,would improve the first-in engine,truck and paremedicALS response
capacity to that area of the City. Redevelopment along the Edinger/Beach corridor and the Downtown Specific Plan will result in a greater
number of calls-for-service changing the response dynamics of the existing eight stations,If the station were not relocated the area in question
would receive longer response times.
Relationship to General Plan Development
Relocating Station#8(Heil)is consistent with the City's General Plan Public Safety response time commitments and would improve the
average engine,aerial truck and ALS paramedic response time through-outihe City,in particular the Edinger/Beach corridor area.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 50.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The redevelopment along the Edinger/Beach corridor and the Downtown Specific Plans would likely be the trigger point for the timing orf this
relocation effort. The station age and limitations are also be an issue and could trigger the constructiontiming.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design/Engineering!Administratit 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 532,561.00 532,561.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,026,097.00 1,026,097.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 4,963,827.00 4,963,827.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 285,204,00 285.204.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 361,781.00 361,781.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 7,169,470.00 7,169,470.00
12
V: 1,08.0 Date:10/13/2011 Time: 4:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppress ionNiedic Facilities,Vehicles And Equipment
Project Number:/Title FS 002 Construct Station#8(Heil)Apparatus Storage Facility
Submiitin>g Departments; Fire Department
Project Description:
Construct a 3,620 square foot reserve apparatus storage facility upon relocation of the existing Station#8(Neil)to it's proposed future location.
The facility Would consist of a 2,660 square foot two bays wide by two vehicle deep storage building for up to four reserve response vehicles.
There would also be a contiguous 960 square foot basic storage room. The facilitywould be constructed on the rear portion of the parcel
nearthe hose tower and hose storage building.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The proposed storage building is necessary for proper storage of the reserve vehicles and other specialty equipment not used on a routine
basis,but important none-the-less. The existing vehicle storage facility cannot stare all of the reservse vehciels thatwill be needed at General
Plan build-out. The existing vehicle storage building will be inadequate for storage of all reserve vehicles at GeneralPlen build-out.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The additional storage space is necessary,in part to new deveopment and also because of the limited capaciaty of the single existing
reserve vehicle storage facility and the existing apparatus inventory.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 25,00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The facility would likely be constructed at the same time as the proposed relocation of station#8(Heil),.However,the construction could be
completed at a different time.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120,415.00 120,415,00
2.Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 327,266.00 327,266.00
3. Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,122,703.00 1,122,703.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64,210.00 64,210,00
5, Equipment 1 Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 81,450.00 81,450.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,716,044.00 1,716,044.00
13
V: 1 X8.0 Date:1011412011 Time: 1:31 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppression/Medic Facilifies,Vehicles And Equipment
Project Number./Title FS 003 Construct A Single Bay/Quarters At Station#4(Magnolia)
Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description:
Construct a 2,400 square foot addition to Station#4(Magnolia)-The plans consist of an additional bay and sufficient living
quarters/training/storage space to be added to the existing two-bay Station#4(Magnolla). The,additional 1,400 square foot vehicle bay
would allow for two additonal response vehicles,in this case an engine and an ambulance. The 1,000 square foot living quarters expansion
would increase storage/locker space by approximately 206 square feet and living/training space by approximately 800 square feet.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The expanded facility will be needed to accommodate the additional calls-for-service demands from the planned density-inceasing
redevelopment from the Downtown Specific Plan and along the southerly portion of the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor. Increased
call-load must be balanced by having adequate fire station quarters and apparatus in order to meet the City's General Plan emergency
response goals. Withoutthe additional facilities,the response goals will be unachievable with the greater demands.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The facility expansion is required to accommodate higher densities resulting from development consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan
and the southerly portion of the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor as well for multiple response vehicle demands to other parts of the City.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 50.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As needed and as development impactfee receipts and other revenues become available.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012.13 2013-14 2014.15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering 1 Administrati( 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 109,650.00 109,650.00
2.Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 o-o0 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 1,020,000.00 1,020,000.00
4. Contingency 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,308,00 60,308.00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 76,500.00 76,500.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,266,458.00 1,256,458.00
14
V:1.08.0 Date:1011412011 Time: 1:32 PM Huntington Beach October,2311
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire SuppressionJMedic Facilities,Vehicles And Equipment
Project Number:/Title FS 004 Acquire An Engine And Ambulance For Station#4(Magnolia)
Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description:
Add an engine company and an ambulance to the Station#4(Magnolia)apparatus inventory. Project FD-003 details the proposed 2.400
square fool quarters/bay expansion required to house the new engine and ambulance as well as staff.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
Increased Call-load must be balanced by having adequate fire station bays/quarters and response apparatus necessary to meet the City's
General Plan emergency response goals. Without the additional resources,the response goals will become unachievable with the greater
demands from continued development.The expanded vehicles are needed to accommodate the additional calls-for-servee demands from
the planned density-inceasing redevelopment from the Downtown Specific Plan and along the southerly portion of the Edinger/Beach Specific
Plan corridor.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The facility expansion is required to accommodate higher densities resulting from development consistent with the Downtown Specfic Plan
and the southerly portion of the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor as well for multiple vehicle response demands to other parts of the City.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 50.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
As needed and as development impactfee receipts and other revenues become available.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 740,000.00 740,000.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 740,000.00 740,000.00
15
V:1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time. 1:35 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities,Vehicles And Equipment
Project Number./Title FS 005 Acquire An Additional Engine For Station#1 (Gothard)
Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description.-
Add a standard engine company at Station#1 (Gothard). The engine would be fully stocked with an appropriate and sufficient amount of
hose,appurtenances and other safety/rescue equipment
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The expanded facilitywill be needed to accommodate the additional calls-for-service demands from the planned density-inceasing
redevelopmentfrom the Downtown Specific Plan and along the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor. Increased call-load must be balanced
by having adequate and sufficient apparatus in order to meet the City's General Plan emergency response goals. Without the additional
apparatus,the response goals will be unachievable with the greater demands.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The facility expansion is required to accommodate higher densities resulting from development consistentwith the Downtown Specific Plan
and the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor as well for multiplevehicle response demands to other parts of the City.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 50.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As needed and as development impact fee receipts and other revenues become available
2015-15
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design!Engineering/Administratic 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0o 0.00
5, Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 525,000.00 625,000.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0,00 525,000-00 525,000.00
16
V: 1.08.0 Date:11/11/2011 Time: 2:44 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Fire Suppression/Medic Facilities,Vehicles And Equipment
Project Numbecl Title FS 006 Acquire An Additional Engine For Station#2(Murdy)
Submitting Departments: Fire Department
Project Description:
Add a standard engine company a1 Station#2(Murdy).The engine would be fully stocked with an appropriate and sufficient amount of hose,
appurtenances and other safety/rescue equipment.
Justification l Consequences of Avoidance:
The apparatus will be needed to accommodate the anticipated additional calls-for-service demands from the planned densivinceasing
redevelopment along the Edinger/Beach Specific Plan corridor. Increased call-load must be balanced by having adequate apparatus in
order to meet the City's General Plan emergency response goals. Without the additional apparatus the response goals will be unachievable
with the greeter demands.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The facility expansion is required to accommodate higher densities along Edison/Beach Specific Plan Corridor and the possibility of multiple
apparatus response demands to other parts of the City
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 50.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As needed and as development impactfee receipts and other revenues become available.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 525.000.00 525,000.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 525,000.00 525,000.00
17
V: 1.08.0 Date:11/1112011 Time: 2:45 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
City ®f Huntington Beach
Circulation (streets, signals
and Bridges) system
18
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Local Circulation (Streets, Signals And Bridges) System
2015-16
Through Project Build
2011 -12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Build Out Out Total
LC-001 Beach Boulevard And Edinger Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $600,000
LC-002 Beach Boulevard And Heil Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1.000,000
LC-003 Beach Boulevard And Warner Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $400,000
LC-004 Beach Boulevard And Slater Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
LC-006 Beach Boulevard And Talbert Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
LC-0D6 Beach Boulevard And Garfield Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000.000 $1,000,000
LC-007 Beach Boulevard And Yorktown Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
LC-008 Pacific Coast Highway And Warner Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000.000
LC-009 Pacific Coast Highway And Goldenwest Street $0 $0 $0 $0 $750,000 $750,000
LC-010 Pacific Coast Highway And Brookhurst Street $0 $0 $0 $0 $75D,000 $750,000
LC-011 Goldenwest Street And Bolsa Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,00D $800,000
LC-012 Goldenwest Street And Slater Street $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
LC-013 Newland Street And Talbert Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
LC-014 Newland Street And Warner Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $30.000
LC-015 Newland Street And Yorktown Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000
LC-016 Gothard Street And Slater Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000
LC-017 Gothard Street And Talbert Avenue $0 $D $0 $0 $264,000 $264,000
LC-018 Ward Street And Garfield Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,800 $8,800
LC-019 Brookhurst Street And Adams Avenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $10,000,000
LC-020 Miscellaneous Traffic Signal/Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000
LC-021 Public Works Maintenance Building $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,820,000 $2,820,000
LC-022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles $0 $0 $0 $0 $65.000 $65,000
V:1.12.0 bate:10/10/2011 Time, 5:38 PM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 1
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Local Circulation (Streets, Signals And Bridges) System
2015-16
Through Project Build
2011 -12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Build Out Out Total
-----------
TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,537,800 $28,537,B00
Notes:
1)If project timing is not a component of this effort,then all projects default to their"Thru Build Out'amount.
O
V: 1.12.0 Date: 1011012011 Time: 5:38 PIVI Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 2
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number./Title LC 001 Beach Boulevard And Edinger Avenue
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capabilityto move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions)-the following improvements to the
intersection are proposed:1)Add 41h northbound through lane,and 2)Add a 3rd westbound through lane. Beach Boulevard,being a State
Highway,makes this a CALTRANS managed project. Since the project would not be managed by the City,the estimated cost consists of the
entire project cost but does not separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification(Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacitywhere warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City.making some of them require improvements orthe LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated overthe next twenty years will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the CiVs existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total3,506,137 daily trip-milesat the twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Builduut: 75.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design I Engineering I Administratic o.00 0.00 0.00 OM 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition i Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600,00100 600,00aoo
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment 1 Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600,000.00 600,000.00
21
V: 1.08.0 Date:1 Oil 412011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number,/Title LC 002 Beach Boulevard And Heil Avenue
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection Cin all directions),the following improvements to the
intersection are proposed:1)Add 2nd northbound left-turn lane.An alternative would be to construct:1)A de facto westbound rightturn lane,
and 2)add a de-facto southbound right turn lane. Beach Boulevard,being a State Highway,makes this a CALTRANS managed project.
Since the projectwould not be managed bythe City,the estimated cost consists of the entire project cost,but does not separate those costs
into engineering and contingency components.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through outthe City thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow."and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles wailing upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other Locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship fa General Plan Development:
All new developmentwill impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated overthe next twenty years will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the CiVs existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-miles at the twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buiidout: 95.013%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administrati< 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
3.Construction 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
S.Equipment/Other 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00
22
V:1.08.0 Date:1 Oil 412011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets.Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number.J Title LC 003 Beach Boulevard And Warner Avenue
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize 1he capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvements to the
intersection are proposed:1)Add a separate westbound right turn lane. An alternative would be to construct the following:1)A de-facto
westbound right turn lane,and 2)add a separate northbound right turn lane. Beach Boulevard,being a State Highway,makes this a
CALTRANS managed project. Since the project would not be managed by the City,the estimated cost consists of the entire project cost,but
does not separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through outthe City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flaw at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level°E"is"Unstable Fiow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection", Level"E"."Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement'.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new developmentwill Impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements orthe LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like V',"E"or"F Development anticipated overthe next twentyyears will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a I.8%increase daily over the City`s existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added dailytrip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total3.506,137 dailytrip-miles atthe twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buitdout: 95,00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing,
The projectwiil be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-15
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total ail Years
1.Design I Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3. Construction Mo 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 400,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 400,000.00
23
V:1.08.0 Date:10/1412011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 004 Beach Boulevard And SlaterAvenue
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capabilityto move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvement to the
intersection is proposed:l)Add a separate eastbound right turn lane. Beach Boulevard,being a State Highway,makes this a CALTRANS
managed project Since the project would not be managed by the City,the estimated cost consists of the entire project cost but does not
separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification J Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from ether locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated over the next twenty years will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the CiVs existing demand of 3,135.213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-miles at the twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1,Design J Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000,00 500,000.00
24
V: 1.08-0 Date:1 0/1 41201 1 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 005 Beach Boulevard And TaibertAvenue
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvements to the
intersection are proposed:1)Add a 2nd westbound left turn lane,2)add a de-facto westbound rightturn lane,3)add a separate northbound
rightturn lane,4)add a 2nd eastbound leftturn lane,and 5)stripe a de-facto eastbound right turn lane. Beach Boulevard,heing a State
Highway,makes this a CALTRANS managed project. Since the project would not be managed by the City,the estimated cost consists of the
entire project cost but does not separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification I Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City.thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
AAII new developmentwill impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated overthe nexttwentyyears will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8.increase daily over the CiVs existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-milesrepresents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-milesat the twen"ear
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 62.90%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administrati< 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment I Other 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000.000.00
25
V:1.08.0 Date:1011412011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number1Title LC 006 Beach Boulevard And Garfield Avenue
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capabilityto move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directlons),the following Option#1 improvements
to the intersection are proposed:1)Add a separate northbound rightturn lane,and 2)add a de-facto southbound right turn lane. An alternative
would to those improvements would be to:1)Add a 2nd northbound left turn lane,and 2)add a 2nd southbound left turn lane. Beach
Boulevard,being a State Highway,makes this a CALTRANS managed project Since the project would not be managed bythe City,the
estimated cost consists of the entire project cost but does not separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification j Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as`long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammer)conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement'.
Relationship to General Plan Development
All new deveiopmentwill impact existing intersections within the City.making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"P.Development anticipated over the nexttwenty years will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the City s eAsting demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added dailytrip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,596,137 daily trip-miles atthe twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 96.00%
Reference Document:
ProjectTiming:
The projeciwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2016-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition!Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 1,000,000.00 1,00n,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,oa0.00
26
V: 1.08.0 Date:10114/2011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 007 Beach Boulevard And Yorktown Avenue
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capabilityto move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvement to the
intersection is proposed:1)Add a separate westbound right turn lane. Beach Boulevard,being a State Highway,makes this a CALTRANS
managed project. Since the project would not be managed by the City,the estimated cast consists of the entire project cost but does not
separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through outthe City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development
All new developmentwill impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements orthe LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated overthe next twentyyears will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the CitVs existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles.all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added doilytrip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 deilytrip-miles atthe twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Build out 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-1s
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Budd-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering I Administratic 0.0o 0.00 0.00 O.00 0,00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00
27
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 008 Pacific Caast Highway And Warner Avenue
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvement to the
intersection is proposed:1)Add a 3rd northbound through lane. Pacific Coast Highway,being a State Highway.makes this a CALTRANS
managed project. Since the projectwould not be managed by the City,the estimated cost consists of the entire project cost but does not
separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flaw:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flaw"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated overlhe next%ventyyearswill generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the City's existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-miles atthe twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildoui: 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build out Total ail Years
1.Design!Engineering/Administratir 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 000 0,00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
28
V:1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach Cctober,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Numberj Title LC 009 Pacific Coast HighwayAndGoldenwestStreet
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvements 10 the
intersection are proposed:1)Add a 2nd eastbound left turn lane,and 2)allow southbound right turn overlap.Pecific Coast Highway.being a
State Highway,makes this a CALTRANS managed project. Since the project would not be managed by the City,the estimated cost consists
of the entire project cost but does not separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification f Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F'.Development anticipated over the next twenty years will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the CitVs existing demand of 3,135,213 daily,rip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an 10,6%of the total 3,506,137 dailytrip-miles at the twenty-year
development horiz on.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 68.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 750.000.00 760,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 750,000.00 75D,000.00
29
V:1.08.0 Date:10114/2011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 010 Pacific Coast Highway And Brookhurst Street
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capabilityto move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvements to the
intersection are proposed:1)Add a 2nd eastbound leftturn lane and,2)allow southbound right turn ovedap.Pacific Coast Highway,being a
State Highway,makes this a CALTRANS managed project. Since the project would not be managed by the City,the estimated cost consists
of the entire project cost,but does not separate those costs into engineering and contingency components.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as'long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Row"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements orthe LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated over the next twenty years will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily overthe Cily's existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 dailytrip-miles at the twenty year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Tetal all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 750,000,00 750,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 750,000.00 750,000.00
30
V:1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time: 6:03 PIVI Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 011 Goldenwest Street And Balsa Avenue
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvements to the
intersection are proposed:1)Add a second southbound left turn lane,2)Add a separate northbound right turn lane and 3).Allow westbound
rightturn overlap. This would be a City-managed project
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles throughout the City,thus movement of traffic across major circulation routes. Failure
to or inability to increase circulation capacitywhere warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Semite(or LOS)traffic flaw at
intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed Conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated overthe next twenty years will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles-
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the CitVs existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,5V added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,508,137 daily trip-miles at the twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 96.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Budd-out Total all Years
1. Design/Engineering/Administradc 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 60,000.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 400,000,00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 40,000.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,o0o.ao
31
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/1412011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number: Title LC 012 Goldenwest Street And Slater Street
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvement to the
intersection is proposed:1)Add a 2nd southbound left turn lane.An alternative would to that improvement would be to:1)Convert a separate
northbound right turn lane to a third northbound through lane.This would be a City-managed project.
Justification J Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation
routesis critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or
LOS)traffic flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck, Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as
"long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates'Jammed conditions,back-ups from other
locations restrict or prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new developmentwill impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"I"'.Development anticipated over the next twentyyears will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles-
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the City s existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles.all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-miles at the twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Budd-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 6,000.00
2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.0D 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
3. Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 40,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
5.Equipment/Other D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 50,000,00
32
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/1412011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2911
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets.Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 013 Newland Street And Talbert Avenue
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(n all directions},the following imprcvementto the
intersection is proposed:1)Add a 2nd eastbound left turn lane.This would be a City-managed project.
Justification IConsequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through outthe City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E "Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D" "E"or"F".Development anticipated over the next twentyyears will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the City`s existing demand of 3,135,213 dailytrip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-milesrepresents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-miles atthe twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 95.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administrati( 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 60,000.00
2. Land Acquisition!Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 400,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 40,000.00 40,000,00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00
33
V:1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets.Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 014 Newland Street And Warner Avenue
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capabilityto move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvements to the
intersection are proposed:l)Convert a separate westbound rightturn lane to a de-facto rightturn lane,and 2)add a 3rd westbound through
lane.This would be a City-managed project.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inabilityto increase circulation capacitywhere warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development
All new developmentwill impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated over the next twentyyears will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.6%increase daily over the City"s existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-miles at the twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 95.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,600,00 3,600.00
2.Land Acquisition!Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.DO 0.00 24,000.00 24,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,400.00 2,400.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 30,000.00 30,000.00
34
V:1.08.0 Date:1 Of 14/2011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Numberl Title LC 015 Newland Street And Yorktown Avenue
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvementto the
intersection is proposed:1)Re-stripe westbound right turn lane to a 2nd westbound through lane.This would be a City-managed project.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck.. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:`and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow'creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement'.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new developmentwill impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements orthe LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated over the next twentyyears will generate 307,924 additional deity trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the CiVs existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6 a of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-miles at the twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 95.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 36,000.00 36.000.00
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240,000,00 240,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,oa0.00 24,000.00
5 Equipment/Other 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 300,000.00
35
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time: 6:03 Pill Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 016 Gothard Street And Slater Avenue
Submitting Departments: PublicbWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvementto the
intersection is proposed:1)Add a 2nd northbound left turn lane.This would be a City-managed project.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles throughout the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream ofthe intersection". Level"E"."Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,beck-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Aft new development will impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements orthe LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated overthe nexttwentyyears will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.6%increase daily over the City"s existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added dailytrip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-miles at the twen"ear
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities sand as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering IAdministratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 60,000.00 60,000.00
2.Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way 0.0o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.0o 0.00 400,000.00 400,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 40,000.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500,000.00
36
V:1,08.0 Date:10114/2011 Time: 6,03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 017GothardStreetAnd Talbert Avenue
Submitting Departments: PublicWarks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions).the following improvementto the
intersection is proposed:1)Add a 2nd southbound left turn lane. An alternative to that improvement would be:1)Convert a separate
eastbound rightturn to a 2nd eastbound through lane.This would be a City-managed project.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection", Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements orthe LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D"."E"or"F".Development anticipated overthe nexttwentyyears will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles,
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the City s existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an'0.6%of the total 3,606,137 daily trip-miles at the twenty-year
development horizon
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 95.00
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Bu ld-out Total all Years
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.0o 0.00 000 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240,000.00 240,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 24,000.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 264,000,00 264,000.00
37
V:1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2911
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number/Title LC 018 Ward Street And Garfield Avenue
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the following improvements to the
intersection are proposed:1)Add a 2nd eastbound leftturn lane,and 2)remove aseparate eastbound right turn lane.This would be a
City-managed project.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through out the City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inability to increase circulation cepacitywhere warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development.
All new development will impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements orthe LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"P'.Development anticipated overthe next twenty years will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily overthe CitVs existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added dailytrip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-milesat the twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwilf be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
2.Land Acquisition t Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3. Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,000.00 8,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 800.00 800.00
5.Equipment 1 Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,800.00 8,800.00
38
V:1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number./Title LC 019 Brookhurst Street And Adams Avenue
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
To maximize the capability to move vehicles and pedestrians across the intersection(in all directions),the fallowing improvements to the
intersection are proposed:1)Add a 4th through lane in each of the four directions,2)add a separate northbound right turn lane,3)allow
northbound righttum overlap and 4)allowwestbound right turn overlap.This would be a City-managed project.
Justification}Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles through outthe City,thus maximum movement of traffic across major circulation routes
is critical. Failure to or inabilityto increase circulation capacity where warranter)and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic
flow at intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow."and is identified as'long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Levet"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions,back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement'.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new developmentwill impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D"."E"or"F".Development anticipated overthe next twenty years will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the City's existing demand of 3,135,213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of major roadway lane miles. The 370,924 added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6%of the total 3,506,137 daily trip-miles at the twen"ar
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013,14 2014,15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design 1 Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00
2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3. Construction 0.00 000 0,00 0.00 8,000,000.Oo 8,000,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 800,000.00 800,000.00
5.Equipment t Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00
39
V: 1.08.0 Date:1011412011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October.2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number./Title LC 020 Miscellaneous Traffic Signal/Intersection Improvements
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
Construct on average,one traffic signal(and supportive intersection improvements)per year over a twenty-year development window.The
intersections would be selected on an as-needed basis from an existing prioritized list of proposed intersections. The improvements would
include,but not necessarily be limited to,concrete curb,sidewalk and disabled ramp alterationss,new signals infrastructure,consisintg of light
arms,lights-electrical control boxes,off-site controls. In addition there may be a need for lane restriping and left-turn and right turn pockets.
These projects would be a City-managed.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
There are few opportunities to add additional lane miles throughout the City,thus movement of traffic across major circulation routes. Failure
to or inability to increase circulation capacity where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service(or LOS)traffic flow at
intersections of major streets to a Level"E"by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E"is"Unstable Flow:"and is identified as"long queues of
vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level"E","Forced Flow"creates"Jammed conditions.back-ups from other locations restrict or
prevent movement".
Relationship to General Plan Development:
All new developmerlwill impact existing intersections within the City,making some of them require improvements or the LOS will drop to
unacceptable levels like"D","E"or"F".Development anticipated over the next twentyyears will generate 307,924 additional daily trip-miles.
This is a 11.8%increase daily over the CiVs existing demand of 3,135.213 daily trip-miles,all of which will compete for use of a static number
of mayor roadway lane miles. The 370,624 added daily trip-miles represents an 10.6%of thetotai 3,506,137 daily trip-miles at the twenty-year
development horizon.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwilf be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-1I4 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design I Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 600,000.00 600,000.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 400,000,00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.000,000.00 5,000,000.00
40
V: 1.08.0 Date:1 011 4120111 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Title LC 021 Public Works Maintenance Building
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
Construct a 10,000 square foot split-face block general-use circulation system maintenance building. The facility would have full utilities and
a number of roll-up doors. Approximately 80%of the cost of the additional space would benefit circulation system maintenance. The
remaining 20%would be required for the growing storm drainage collection system maintenance needs and would thus be financed with
Storm Drainage System Development Impact Fee proceeds_ The cost below represents 80%of the proposed cost of the facility.
Justification f Consequences of Avoidance:
The additional space needs is required tro support the roughly$40.0 million in additional equipment and supply space needs resulting from
the addition of major circulation and strom drainage improvements as well as an untold amount of local street miles and local strom drainage
lines.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The facility expansion is limited to the demand created by the new infrastructure required to support new development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwould be constructed based upon normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient DIF revenues are collected.
2016,15
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Buil"ut Total all Years
1.Design 1 Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 265,000,00 265,000.00
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 2,410,000.00 2,410,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 145,000.00 145,000.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 2,820,000.00 2,820,000.00
41
V: 1.08.0 Date:10114/2011 Time: 6:03 PIVI Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Local Circulation(Streets,Signals And Bridges)System
Project Number:/Tide LC 022 Public Works Maintenance Vehicles
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Maintenance
Project Description:
Acquire an additional maintenance utilitytruck and a traffic signal lifttruck.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The additional maintenance vehicle would be required to supportthe additional demands from the roughly$25.0 million in additional
circulation system improvements.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The circulation system maintenance fleet expansion is limited to the demands created by new infrastructure required to support new
development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 95.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The proposed afleet additions would be acquired based upon normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient OF revenues are
collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 201 t-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design I Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,Land Acquisition f Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 a.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
4.Contingency 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment I Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65,000.00 65,000.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 65,000.00 55,000m
42
V: 1.03,0 Date:10/1412011 Time: 6:03 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
City of Huntington Beach
Storm Drainage
Collection System
43
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Storm Drainage Collection System
2015-16
Through Project Build
2011 -12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Build Out Out Total
SD-001 Santa Ana River&Talbert Channel Region(SD Region#1) $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,728,000 $23,728.000
SD-002 Coastal And Bolsa Chica Wetlands Region(SD Region#2) $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,627,000 $21.527,000
SD-003 Slater Channel Region(SD Region#3) $0 $9 $0 $0 $34.236,000 $34,236,000
SD-004 Wintersburg Channel Region(SD Region#4) $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,749,000 $28,749,000
SD-005 Bolsa Chita Channel&Harbour Region(SD Region#5) $0 $0 $0 $0 $98,549,000 $98,549,000
SD-006 Public Works Maintenance Building $0 $0 $0 $0 $705,050 $705,050
TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $0 $207494,050 $207494,050
Notes:
1)If project timing is not a component of this effort,then all projects default to their"Thru Build Out"amount.
-P
V:1.12.0 Date:10/10/2011 Time: 5:38 PM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 1
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
lnfrastructute: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number:/Title SD 001 Santa Ana River&Talbert Channel Region(SD Region#1)
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
The 788 individual projects within Area 1 are required to remove storm drainage wafer from the City's street surfaces and other public areas
and safely conveying itto the proper outlet. Sub-drainage region#1 drains the lower central to east and southerly areas of the City.It is
generally bordered on the east by the Santa Ana River Channel.on the southwest by the Pacific Coast Highway and the Pacific Ocean,on the
west mainly by Alabama and Main Streets,and on the north by Garfield and Ellis Avenues.It encompasses the Santa Ana River and the
Talbert Channel Water Quality Planning Area and is represented in watershed Drainage Maps 20-27,29-32,40,and 41.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
These improvements are needed to provide efficient removal of storm water from the City's streets,roads and other public areas. Storm
water will increase in amounts proportional to the amount of impervious surface reducing the capability of the ground to absorb water. The
amount ranges from a low of 0.745 for detached dwellings to a high of 0.830 for commercial properties. If not completed,there would be the
potential forilooding of downstream creeks,washes and other storm drainage collection pipes. Emergency vehicle response by the City"s
Police,Fire and Public Works crews could be effected to all areas of the City.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A proportional amount of the projects,vis-a-vis the cost of the entire system,is appropriate.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: T52`0
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1,Design I Engineering/Administratic a.oa 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,847,360.00 2,847,360.00
2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 O.Oo 0.00 0.00 18,982,400.00 18,982,400,00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,898,240.00 1,898,240.00
5.Equipment I Other 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,728,000.00 23,728,000.00
45
V: 1.08.0 Date:10110/2011 Time: 6:00 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number./Title SD 002 Coastal And Solse Chico Wetlands Region(SD Region#2)
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
The 235 projects within Area#2 are required to remove storm drainage water from the City's street surfaces and other public areas and safely
convey itto the proper outlet. Sub-drainage region#2 drains the central southwest area of the City,and is generally bordered by Lake and
Main Streets on the east Pacific Coast Highway on the south and west Seapoint Avenue and Edwards Street on the west and Ellis Avenue
on the north.Sub-drainage 2 also includes the community surrounding the Springdale/Talbert intersection.It encompasses the Bolsa Chica
Wetlands and the Coastal Water Quality Planning Area and is represented in watershed Drainage Maps 16-1 S.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
These improvements are needed to provide efficient removal of storm water from the City's streets,roads and other public areas. Storm
water will increase in amounts proportional to the amount of impervious surface reducing the capability of the ground to absorb water. The
amount ranges from a low of 0,745 for detached dwellings to a high of 0.830 for commercial properties. If not completed,there would be the
potential for flooding of downstream creeks,washes and other storm drainage collection pipes. Emergency vehicle response bythe City's
Police,Fire and Public Works crews could be effected to all areas of the City.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A proportional amount of the projects,vis-a-vis the cost of the entire system,is appropriate.
Allocation To General Plan Build out: 7.52%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-16 through Build-out Totai all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 2,583,240.00 2,583,240.00
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,221,600.00 17,221,600.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,722,160,00 1,722,160.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,527,000.00 21,527,000.00
46
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/10/2011 Time: 6:00 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number/Title SD 003 Slater Channel Region(SD Region#3)
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
The 270 projects within Area#3 are required to remove storm drainage water tram the City's street surfaces and other public areas and safely
convey it to the proper outlet Sub-drainage region 3 drains the central section of the City,including a portion of the City of Fountain Valley,and
is generally bordered by Newland and Magnolia Avenues on the east Ellis,Taylor and Talbert Avenues on the south.Graham and Boisa
Chica Streets on the west and Warner Avenue on the north.Sub-drainage 3 consists of the Slater Channel Water Quality Planning Area and is
represented in watershed Drainage Maps 10-15.
Justification I Consequences of Avoidance:
These improvements are needed to provide efficient removal of storm water from the City's streets,roads and other public areas. Storm
waterwiil increase in amounts proportional to the amount of impervious surface reducing the capability of the ground to absorb water. The
amount ranges from a low of 0.745 for detached dwellings to a high of 0.830 for commercial properties. If not completed,there would be the
potential for flooding of downstream creeks,washes and other storm drainage collection pipes. Emergencyvehicle response by the CiVs
Police,Fire and Public Works crews could be effected to all areas of the City.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A proportional amount of the projects,vis-a-vis the cost of the entire system.is appropriate.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: TU%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 OM 4,108,320.00 4,108,320.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,388,800.00 27,388,800.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,738.880,00 2,738.880.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,236,o00.0o 34,236.000.00
47
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/1012011 Time: 6,00 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Coilection System
Project Number/Title SD 004 Wintersburg Channel Region(SD Region#4)
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
The 220 projects within Area 44 are required to remove storm drainage water from the City`s street surfaces and other public areas and safely
convey it to the proper outlet,Sub-drainage region 4 includes the northern and northeastern parts of the City,and is generally bordered by
Newland Street an the east,Heil and Warner Avenues on the south,Springdale Street on the west and McFadden Avenue on the north.
Sub-drainage 4 corresponds to the Wintersburg Water Quality Channel Planning Area and is represented in watershed Drainage Maps 6-9.
Justification I Consequences of Avoidance:
These improvements are needed to provide efficient removal of storm water from the City's streets,roads and other public areas. Storm
waterwill increase in amounts proportional to the amount of impervious surface reducing the capability of the ground to absorb water. The
amount ranges from a low of 0.745 for detached dwellings to a high of 0.830 for commercial properties. If not completed,there would be the
potential for flooding of downstream creeks,washes and other storm drainage collection pipes. Emergency vehicle response by the Cit/s
Police,Fire and Public Works crews could be effected to all areas of the City.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A proportional amount of the projects,vis-a-vis the cost of the entire system,is appropriate.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 7.52%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design I Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,449,880.00 3,449,880.00
2, Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 D.Oo 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,999,200.00 22.999,200.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.00 2,299,920.00 2,299,920.00
5.Equipment 1 Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.DO 0.00 28,749.000,00 28,749.000,00
48
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/10/2011 Time: 6.00 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number:/Title SC 005 Balsa Chico Channel&Harbour Region(SD Region#5)
Submitting Departments: PublicWorks-Engineering
Project Description:
The 278 projects within Area#5 are required to remove storm drainage water from the City's street surfaces and other public areas and safely
convey itto the proper outlet Sub-drainage region 5 covers the northwestern section of the City,including a portion of the City of Westminster.
Bub-drainage 5 corresponds to the Harbor Water Quality Planning Area and the Balsa Chica Channel Water Quality Planning Area and is
represented in watershed Drainage Maps 1-5.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
These improvements are needed to provide efficient removal of storm water from the City's streets,roads and other public areas. Storm
water will increase in amounts proportional to the amount of impervious surface reducing the capability ofthe ground to absorb water. The
amount ranges from a low of 0,745 for detached dwellings to a high of 0.830 for commercial properties. If not completed,there would be the
potential for flooding of downstream creeks,washes and other storm drainage collection pipes. Emergency vehicle response by the Civs
Police,Fire and Public Works crews could be effected to all areas of the City.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A proportional amount of the projects,vis-a-vis the cost of the entire system,is appropriate.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 7.52%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The projectwill be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administrati< 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,825,880.00 11,825,880.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.0a 0.00 0.00 OM 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78,839,200.00 78,839,200.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,883,920.00 7,883,920.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 98,549,000.00 98,549,000.00
49
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/1012011 Time: 8:00 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Storm Drainage Collection System
Project Number:JTitle SD 006 Public Works Maintenance Building
Submitting Departments: Public Works-Engineering
Project Description:
.Construct a 10,000 split-face block general use,maintenance building. The facilitywould be have full utilities and a number of roll-up doors.
Approximately 20%of the cost of an additional 10,000 square foot building in support of General Fund Public Works maintenance from Storm
Drainage System Development Impact Fees. The remaining 80%would be financed with Circuation System Development Impact Fees.
Justification J Consequences of Avoidance:
The additional spat,needs would be required to support the additional maintenance demands from the construction of additional circulation
and storm drainage infrastructure improvements.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The facility expansion is limited to the demands created bythe new infrastructure required to support new development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 100.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project will be constructed within normal review of priorities and as adequate and sufficient revenues are collected.
2016-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through euildout Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering 1 AdministratiC 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 66,250.00 66,250,00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3, Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 602,500.00 602,500.00
4.Contingency 0.00 O.Oo 0.00 0.00 36,300.00 36,300.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 705,050.00 705,050.00
50
V: 1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time: 6:08 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
City of Huntington Beach
Public Library Facilities
and Collection
51
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Public Library Facilities And Collection
2015-16
Through Project Build
2011 -12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Build Out Out Total
PL-001 Expand Banning Branch Library $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,268,470 &5,268,470
PL-002 Expand Main Street Branch Library $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,651,375 $1,651.375
PL-003 Expand Library Collection Items $0 $0 $0 $0 $921,524 $921,524
TOTALS $0 $0 $() $0 $7,841.369 $7.841,369
Notes:
1)If project timing Is not a component of this effort,then all projects default to their"Thru Build Out'amount.
lJ
V:1.12.0 Date: 10/14/2011 Time:11:53 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 1
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Public Library Facilities And Collection
Project plumber:/Title PL 001 Expand Banning Branch Library
Submitting Departments: Library Services
Project Description:
Expand the Banning Branch Library facilities by 10,100 square feet from the current 2,400 square feet to 12.500 square feet to assit in maintain
the existing levels of service and extend those same levels of service to the I TD89 new residents expected to be added through General
Plan build-out
Justification j Consequences of Avoidance:
The current defacto library standard of space is 0.669 square feet per resident. Added 17,089 residents from new General Plan development
will create additional demands upon the existing level of service provided by the library. Without increasing library space,the existing
standard would decrease to about 0.614 square feet per resident.
Relationship to General Plan Development
The proposed improvements are required to meef the demands of an increasing residential population.
Allocation To General Plan Build out: 100.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
Based upon the rate of construction of residential units and thus collection of any imposed development Impact Fees.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design t Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 635,260.00 535,260.00
2.Land Acquisition!Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 808,000,00 808,000.00
3. Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 3,568,370.00 3,568,370.00
4.Contingency 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 566,840.00 356.840.00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,268,470.00 6,268,470.00
53
V:1.08.0 Date:1 0/1 21201 1 Time: 3.54 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Public Library Facilities And Collection
Project Number J Title PL 002 Expand Main Street Branch Library
Submitting Departments: Library Services
Project Description:
Expand the Main Street Branch Library facilities by 4,804 square feet from the current 4,500 square feet to 9,304 square feet to assist in the
maintenance of the existing levels of service and extend those same levels of service to the 17,0.89 new residents expected to be added
through General Plan build-out The project consists taking 4.804 square feet of the current building that house the branch library currently
used by a non-City tenant and turning it into library space. There is no current effort to oust the current tenant,however,ultimately the
non-library space could easily be converted as librray space.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The current defacto library standard of space is 0.669 square feet per resident. Added 17,089 residents from new General Plan development
will create additional demands upon the existing level of service provided bythe library. Without increasing library space,the existing
standard would decrease to about 0.614 square feet per resident.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The proposed improvements are required to meet the demands of an increasing residential population.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 100.00
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
Based upon the rate of construction of residential units and thus collection of any imposed development Impact Fees.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012.13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 198,165.00 198,166,00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 0,00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,321,100.00 1,321,100.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 132,110.00 132,110.00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,651,375.00 1,651.375,00
54
V: 1.08.0 Date:10112/2011 Time: 3:54 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Public Library Facilities And Collection
Project Number:lTitle PL 903 Expand Library Collection Items
Submitting Departments: Library Services
Project Description:
Expand the public library collection items inventory by roughly 36,861 items to maintain the existing 2.157 collection items per resident currently
offered by the City's library system.
Justification{Consequences of Avoidance:
Added population from new residential construction will increase the City's residential population by approximately 17,089 additional
residents. Without expanding the library collection items inventory,that standard would drop to approximately 1.979 items per resident.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The proposed improvements are required to meet the demands of an increasing residential population.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 100.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
Based upon the rate of construction of residential units and thus collection of any imposed development Impact Fees.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic O.oa 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2,Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 921,524.00 921,524.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 921,524.00 921,524.00
55
V: 1.08.0 Date:1 0/1 412 01 1 Time:11:53 AM Huntington Beach October,2011
City ®f Huntington Beach
Community Use Facilities
56
Huntington-Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Community Use Facilities
2015-16
Through Project Build
2011 -12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Build Out Out Total
CF-001 Central Park Senior Center $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,000.000 $22,000,000
CF-o02 Edison Community Center Gymnasium $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,975,000 $2,975.000
CF-003 Murdy Community Center Gymnasium $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,975.000 $2,975,000
CF-004 Oak View Recreation Center Expansion $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $800,000
TOTALS $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,750,000 $28,750,000
Notes:
1)if project timing is not a component of this effort,then all projects default to their"Thm Build Out"amount.
V:1.12.0 Date: 1 0/1 01201 1 Time: 5:39 PM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page 1
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Community Use Facilities
Project Number: Titfe CF 001 Central Park Senior Center
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct 45,000 square foot Senior Center in Central Park. The facility would have a large multi-purpose room,a number of smaller
classrooms,awarming kitchen,fitness center,game room with pool tables.and ancillary offices. There would also be a garden patio with a
water feature,turf and gardens. The facility would have parking for 2S0 vehicles.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The City currently has a de-facto standard of 0,620 square feet or general purpose community use facility space per resident based upon the
City's 118,820 square feet of public use facilities available to the 190,377 residents, The City wishes to maintain,if not improve,this standard
by construction. The 0.620 square foot per person is notthe standard for senior only facilities,but for all community use facilities available to
the entire residential population.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The proposed land-use database indicates additional residential dwellings that would likely result in roughly 17,089 additional residents
requiring at least 10,595 square feet of public use space in orderto maintain the existing level of service(LOS)
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The construction of the facility is on-hold pending litigation.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through ElWd-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 2,200,000.00 2,200,000.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,600,000,00 17,600,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 1,760,000.00 1,760,000,00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 440,000.00 440,000.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22,000,000.00 22,000,000.00
58
V: 1.08.0 Date:1111112011 Time: 2:40 PIN Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Community Use Facilities
Project Number:/Title CIF 002 Edison Community Center Gymnasium
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct a 7,000 square foot gymnasium contiguous to the Edison Community Center. The facility would be a basic"high school"design or
grade with a single main basketball courtthat can be broken dawn into two smallerfuli-courts orfour half-courts for practice sessions. The
facilitywould also have locker rooms and restrooms.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
Due to higher demands of their own,the local high school gymnasiums are no longer as available as they once were. As a result the City is
finding it more difficultto meet the City's youth indoor sports needs.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The proposed land-use database indicates additional residential dwellings thatwould likely result in roughly 17,089 additional residents
requiring at least 10,595 square feet of public use space in order to maintain the existing level of service(LOS).
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The expansion is planned for construction between 2010 and 2020.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total a(!Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 357,000.00 357,000.00,
2. Land Acquisition i Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,380,000.00 2,38o,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 238,000.00 238,000.00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,975,000.00 2,975,000.00
59
V:1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time. 6.18 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Community Use Facilities
Project Nurni Title CIF 003 Murdy Community Center Gymnasium
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct a 7.000 square foot gymnasium contiguous to the Murdy Community Center. The facilitywould be a basic"high school"design or
grade with a single main basketball court that can be broken down into two smaller full-courts or four half-courts for practice sessions. The
facility would also have locker roams and restrooms.
Justification I Consequences of Avoidance:
Due to higher demands of their own,the local high school gymnasiums are no longer as available as they once were. As a result the City is
finding it more difficultto meetthe City's youth indoor sports needs. This problem will only increase with more residents.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The proposed land-use database indicates additional residential dwellings that would likely result in roughly 17,089 additional residents
requiring at least 10,595 square feet of public use space in order to maintain the existing level of service'LOS).
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document
ProjectTiming:
The expansion is planned for construction between 2010 and 2020.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013.14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design 1 Engineering f Administratic D.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 357,000.00 357,000.00
2.Land Acquisition!Right Of Way o.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,380,000.00 2,380,000.00
4,Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 238,000.00 238,000.00
5. Equipment 1 Other 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
TOTAL COST: 0.D0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,975,000.00 2,975,000.00
60
V:1.08.0 Date:10/14/2011 Time: 6:18 PM Huntington Beach October,2911
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Community Use Facilities
Project Number:/Title OF 004 Oak View Recreation Center Expansion
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description
Construct a roughly 2GD0 square foot expansion to the existing 10,000 square foot Oak View Recreation Oammunity Center. The facility would
consist of a game room,multi-purpose room and a restroom.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The facility is necessary(or planned)to maximize the fairly small facility.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The proposed land-use database indicates additional residential dwellings that would likely result in roughly 17,1089 additional residents
requiring at least 10,595 square feet of public use space in order to maintain the existing level of service(LOS).
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The expansion is planned for construction between 2010 and 2020.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design/Engineering/Administrant 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 80,000,00 80,000,00
2.Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 640,000.00 640,000M
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64,000.00 64,000.00
5.Equipment I Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.000.00 16,000.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600,0co.00 800,000.00
61
V: 1.08.0 Date:1 0/1 4120 1 1 Time: 6:18 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
City of Huntington Beach
Pudic Library Facilities
and Collection
NOTE:"Allocation to General Plan"on all projects is listed as 0.00%because any or all of the projects will qualify for
Quimby Act financing due to it's flexibility.
62
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
2015-16
Through Project Build
2011 -12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Build Out Out Total
PK-001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan And E[R $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5.400,000
PK-002 Irby Park Phase II $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $600,000
PK-003 Edison Park Youth Sport Complex Plan&Phase I Improvements $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000 $4,250,000 $5,500,000
PK-004 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR,RAP And Development $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 $4,325,000
PK-005 Le Bard Park Expansion Master Plan And Development Plan $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $1,450,000
PK-006 Blufftop Park Permanent Beach Restrooms $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 $2,400,000
PK-007 Blufftop Park Trail Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
PK-008 Edinger Dock Development $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $700,000
PK-009 Wardiow Field Reconfiguration Design/Construction $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $880,000 $1,000,000
PK-010 Worthy Park Restroom $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 $130,000
PK-011 Skate Park Facility&Restroom Design/Const. $130,000 $0 $0 $0 $1.130,000 $1,260,000
PK-012 City-Wide Parks Master Plan $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $350,000
PK-013 Central Park Habitat Plan $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $260,000
PK-014 Central Park Acquisiton Of Encyclopedia Lots $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,020,000 $1,020.000
PK-015 Central Park Development Of Remaining 86 Acres $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000,000 $20,000,000
PK-016 Central Park Rebuild Two Restaurant Facilities $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $800,000
PK-017 General Youth Sports Facilities Grants $150.000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $39,000.000 $39,600,000
PK-018 Sport Complex(eth Field) $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $450,000
PK-019 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase 11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $2,500,000
PK-020 Beach Playground $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $350,000
PK-021 Central Park Development Of Former Gun Range Area $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $3,000.000
PK-022 Warner Dock Renovation And Expansion $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $800.000
W
V: 1.12.0 Date:11/08/2011 Time: 9:24 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 1
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan
Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
2015-16
Through Project Build
2011 -12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Build Out Out Total
PK-023 Lamb Park Design And Development $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000 $1,100,000
PK-024 Central Park Sports Complex Team Room $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
PK-025 Future Parks Acquisition(Possible Closed School Sites) $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,748,00D $14,748,000
TOTALS $1,375,000 $150,000 $150,000 $1,400,000 $106668,000 $108733,000
Notes:
1)If project timing is not a component of this effort,then all projects defaultto their"Thru Build Out"amount
ON
V:1.12.0 Date:11/08/2011 Time: 9:24 AM Huntington Beach October,2011 Page: 2
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:/Title PK 001 Bartlett Park Conceptual Plan And EIR
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
The project consists of the environmental assessment and conceptual plan forthe remaining 28 acre Bartlett Park,largely an Environmentally
Sensitive Habitat Area(ESHA). The preliminary plans include a natural-passive use consisting of trails,trailhead kiosks,end limited,natural
parking.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The park improvements are needed for protection of the currently open or vacant parcel. Roughly 90%4 of the park would remain untouched
with improvements designed to protect that 90%.
Relationship to General Plan Development
Little direct relationship,but the improvements are consistent with the CiVs General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the
additional residents resulting from new development. The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0,09%.
Reference Document
ProjectTimmg:
The design and environment assessment component is planned for 2009 to 2010. The first construction component is planned for between
2010 and 2020.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012.13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total a{t Years
1.Design I Engineering I Administrafk 400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 900,000.00
2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.0o 0.00 4,000,000.00 4,0011,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000M 500.000.00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
TOTAL COST: 400,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 5,400,000.00
65
V: 1.08.0 Date:11/11/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:/Title PK 002 Irby Park Phase II
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
The project consists of the development of the remaining eight acres. Construct bio-filter and water retention area. In addition,construct trails,
passive pocket areas,interpretive signs and a small area of neighborhood park improvements(climbing apparatus,benches,picnictables)
adjacent to the neighborhood area. The more active portion would be designed in a fashion to protect the more natural areas.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The park needs a combination of passive/active improvements to create a balance of active uses with protection of the water retention
needs. The water retention needs would receive appropriations from storm drainage sources,a State Public Works Grant.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,but the improvements are consistentwith the Citys General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly supportthe
additional residents resulting from new development. The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00i
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
Based upon receipt of State(Public Works)Grant. The project is in conjunction with a PW State Grant-matching funds.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design I Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 50.000.00
2.Land Acquisition!Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 400,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0AID 50,000.00 50,000.00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 500.000.00
66
V: 1.08.0 Date:1 111 1/201 1 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:/Title PK 003 Central Park Former Gun Range EIR RAPAnd Development
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
The project consists of an Environmental Impact Review,Remedial Action Plan and ultimately a development plan. The gun range has been
inactive for overten years and the accumulated lead in the soil and use of creosote woad presents an environmental problem and must be
remediated before re-use. Phase I consists of preparafion of an Environmental Impact Report and Remedial Action Plan, Phase II($2.0
million)is an estimate of the range remediation, Phase III(also$2.0 million)is the actual site improvements to turn it into an active park use,
proposed at this time to be a skate park.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The roughly five acre gun range area is pan of the City's major regional park and needs to be used to its maximum potential in a yetto be
determined manner.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,but the improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the
additional residents resulting from new development.The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
The studyfreport,site remediation and site improvements are planned for a period between 2010 and 2020.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-cut Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 325.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325,000.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.000,000.00 4,000,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 325,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000,000.00 4,325,000.00
67
V:1.08.0 Date:11/11/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:J Title PK 004 Le Bard Park Expansion Master Plan And Development Plan
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Undertake the Park Master Plan and construction documents necessary to expand the turf area and park amenities on the two remaining
undeveloped acres. The improvements will be completed in a single phase. Improvements also include the elimination of drainage
problems and construction of a ramp to the Santa Ana RiverTrail,
Justification J Consequences of Avoidance:
The park improvements are necessary to complete the park and maximize the roughly five acres available at this park.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the
additional residents resulting from new development The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Suildout: 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As park-related revenues become available.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design I Engineering 1 Administratic 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250,000.00
2.Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3,Construction 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
S.Equipment 1 Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 250,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200,000,00 1,450,000.00
68
V: 1.08.0 Date:1111112011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:/Title PK 005 Blufftop Park Trail Improvements
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct improvements to the existing two and a half-mile long asphalt trail,including a splittrail system for pedestrian and wheeled traffic.
The project includes 15%for citizen input project design/engineering,soils and materials testing,project plan check and construction
inspection.The project also includes a standard 10%for project contingency.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The project is necessary to reduce the rate of erosion of the very important blufftcp area.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
None direct;y,the improvements are primarily necessary to maintain an existing asset
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
As revenues permit.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Totai all Years
1.Design!Engineering!Administratit 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 120,000.00 120,000.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 800,000,00 800,000.00
4. Coningency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,000.00 80,000.00
5.Equipment I Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 o.00 0.00 1,000,000 00 1,000,000.00
69
U:1.08.0 Date:11111/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:{Title PK 006 Edinger dock Development
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct a new dock and boat launch.
Justification j Consequences of Avoidance:
The improvements need to be made to meatthe recreational boating needs of the community.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentwith the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly supportthe
additional residents resulting from new development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
Within priority and as Park Fund revenues become available.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total ail Years
1,Design 1 Engineering/Administratic o.0o 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
3.Construction 0.0o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 600,000.00 600,000.00
5.Equipment 1 Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00
TOTAL COST: 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 700,000.00 700,000.00
70
V: 1.08.0 Date:1 111 11201 1 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number./Title PK 007 Wardlow Fieid Reconfiguration Design/Construction
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Reconfigure the parkto accommodate ayouth sports field and plan for additional parking. Construction costs for the little league field and
parking lot are included at$389,000,
Justification l Consequences of Avoidance:
The parks earlier configuration is inefficient in terms of space.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,but the improvements are consistentwith the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the
additional residents resulting from new development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
2010.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012.13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 120,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120,000.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0,00 0.0o 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 800,000.00 800,000.00
4,Contingency 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 80,000.00 80,000.00
5.Equipment I Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 120.000-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 880,000.00 1,000,000.00
71
V: 1.08.0 Date:I V1112011 Time: 2:14 PIVI Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:/Title PK 008 City-Wide Parks Master Plan
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
The project consists solely of the preparation of a Parks Master Plan.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
A Master Plan of Parks is needed to insure the continued rational programmed development of the City parks system.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
A Park Master Plan forthe continued development of the City's Park system is directly related to General Plan development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.000/.
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project is scheduled forthe period of 2010 to 2020.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES - 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-16 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 350,000.00 350,000.00
2,Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
5. Equipment/Other 0.00 0.0a 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350,000.00 350,000M
72
V:1.08,0 Date:1111112011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:/Title PK 009 Central Park Habitat Plan
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Complete an enhanced habitat plan for entire Central Park area. The plan is necessaryfor mitigating the raptor foraging area related to the
areas slated for construction of the proposed Central Paris Senior Center. The results may indicate the need for a one-to-one basis within the
park That is,all negative impacts must be fully mitigated.
Justrfication/Consequences of Avoidance:
The area proposed for the Senior Citizens Center has been vacant for a great deal of lime and has become a raptor foraging area. The City
needs to study the entire park area and determine if and how the impact of the proposed development of the Senior Center can be mitigated
on a park-wide basis.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentwith the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly supportthe
additional residents resulting from new development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
As revenues permit,
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES .2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014.15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 Q.00 0,00 0.00 250,000.00 250,000.00
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 D.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250,000.00 250,000.00
73
V: 108.0 Date:11/11/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:)Title PK 010 Central Park Acquisiton Of Encyclopedia Lots
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
The expenditures allow for the acquisition of fifty-one privately owned lots located within park boundaries at approximately$20,000 per lot
The small,individual lots are located generally north of Ellis,south of Edwards and west of Golden West Avenues.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The acquisition of the small lots is necessaryto allowfor the complete development and thus maximization,of Central Park.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentwith the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the
additional residents resulting from new development. The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
As Park Fund revenues permit.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Budd-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.020.000.00 1,020,000.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.oO 0.00
5.Equipment!Other 0.00 OM 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,020,000.00 1,020,000.00
74
V: 1.08.0 Date:11111/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number. Title PK 011 Central Park Development Of Remaining 86 Acres
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Complete the mostly passive area of the park,near Ellis and Golden West Avenues,with trails,picnic areas,a restroom and additional
parking per the Central Park Master Plan.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The improvements are necessary to maximize the use of this major park.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,but the improvements are consistentwith the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly supportthe
additional residents resulting from new development. The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As park capital revenues permit.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OD
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000,00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00
75
V:1.08.0 Date:11/11/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number./Title PK 012 Central Park Rebuild Two Restaurant Facilities
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Rebuild the"Park Bench Cafe"and"Alice's Restaurant".
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The facilities are nearlythirty years old and in need of replacement
Relationship to Genera!Plan Development:
These improvements are largely concession-based improvements and thus financed with long-term concession revenues.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document
Project Timing:
As revenues permit and as negations are completed.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 800,000.00 800,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 800,000.00 800,000.00
76
V: 1.08.0 Date:11/11/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number./Title PK 013 General Youth Sports Facilities Grants
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
The proposed expenditure acts as seed money for grants obtained byvolunteeryouth sports programs. The project consists of$150,000 per
year in grant assistance.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The City has had a long-term policy of assisting local groups leverage City money for common park area improvements.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,but the improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the
additional residents resuiting from new development.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0,00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As requested by local groups that have success in obtaining grants or other financial assistance.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.0o 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 160,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.D0 150,000.00 39,000,000.00 39,600,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 150,000.00 160,000.00 160,000.00 150,000.00 39,0o0,000.00 39,600,000.00
77
V:1.08.0 Date:11/1112011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park facilities Development
Project Numberl Title PIG 014 Murdy Youth Sports Complex Phase 11
Submitting Departments Community Services
Project Description:
Reconfigure the current park school configuration to increase youth sports capabilities. The City and school district will amend the existing
joint use agreement and the City will construct a sports field on school property. There will also be parking lot improvements with additional
spaces and a turn-around.
Justification f Consequences of Avoidance:
The existing field configuration does not maximize the existing field space for use by youth sports associations and the re-design of the
existing park and school parcels will address this shortcoming.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The existing field configuration does not maximize the existing field space for use byyouth sports associations and the re-design will address
this.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As revenues permit.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013.14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1. Design 1 Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3. Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: O.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00
78
V:1.08.0 Date:1111112011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October_2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number)Title PK 015 Beach Playground
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct atot lottyouth playground with capability to serve the needs of two different age groups. The improvement would be located on the
City beach north of the pier adjacent to Blufftop Park at 9th Street. The park would have asphalt access with aturnabout.
Justification f Consequences of Avoidance:
The improvements are intended to improve the beach day experience foryouths.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The existing field configuration does not maximize the existing field space for use by youth sports associations and the re-design will address
this.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
As revenues permit.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350,000.00 350,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
5. Equipment/Other Goo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 350,000.00 350,000.00
79
V: 1.08.0 Date:11/11/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number: Title PK 016 Central Park Development Of Former Gun Range Area
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
The project consists of the removal of the existing gun range and designing/constructing a skate park facility.
Justification I Consequences of Avoidance:
The City currently has no facilities of its own for in-line skating and skateboarding in this area of the community and will need to offset the loss
of the existing Huntington Beach High School skate facility,
Relationship to General Plan Development:
None directly,but the proposed skate facility is capacity increasing,
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction between 2010 and 2020.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through ElWd-out Total all Years
1.Design I Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 360.000.00 360,000.00
2.Land Acquisition I Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,400,000.00 2,400,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 240,000,00 240,000.00
5.Equipment I Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000,00
80
V: 1.08.0 Date:t 1111/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:/Title PK 017 Warner Dock Renovation And Expansion
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Improve the Edinger Dock area by dredging the area and adding four to six docks or slips. There would also be improements made to the
public boat launch ramp.
Justification j Consequences of Avoidance:
The area serves the yacht club activities as well as casual boaters.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentwith the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly supportthe
additional residents resulting from new development The projectis also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction between 2010 and 2020.
2016-15
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total all Years
1.Design 1 Engineering 1 Administratic 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 96,000.00 96,000.oa
2. Land Acquisition!Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.Construction 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4. Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 640,000.00 640,000.00
5.Equipment 1 Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64,000.00 64.000.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 800,000.00 800,000.00
81
V: 1.08.0 Date:1 1 11 11201 1 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:/Title PK 018 Lamb Park Design And Development
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Design,engineer and construct park improvements on the 2.4 acre Lamb Park site. The improvements would include lighted sports facilities
(ballfield and sportsfield)and other neighborhood fixtures such as benches,sidewalks,drinking fountains and a play apparatus on the parcel,
a closed school site.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The park improvements,mostly sports oriented are necessary to complete the park and maximize the roughly 2.4 acres available at this
p ark.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,butthe improvements are consistentwith the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the
additional residents resulting from new development. The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout 0.00
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction between 2010 and 2020.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through guild-out Total all Years
1.Design/Engineering I Administratic 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 132,000.00 132,000.00
2.Land Acquisition f Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 880,000.00 880,000.00
4.Contingency 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 88,000.00 86,000.00
5_Equipment I Other 0.00 0.00 0.0o 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oa 1,100,000.00 1,1oa,000.00
82
V: 1.08.0 Date:11/1112011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:/Title PK 019 Central Park Sports Complex Team Room
Submitting Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Construct ateam-room at the sports complex The facility would be used byteams for during game breaks. The facifitywould have electrical
service and possibly a drinking fountain butwould not include shower/locker facilities.
Justification I Consequences of Avoidance:
The facility will provide sports teams with a location for team discussions,changing and personal effects security.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
Little direct relationship,but the improvements are consistent with the City's General Plan Recreation Element and indirectly support the
additional residents resulting from new development. The project is also capacity increasing.
Allocation To General Plan Suildout: 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction between 2010 and 2020.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDF RJRES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-Out Total aii Years
1.Design 1 Engineering I Administratic 0.0D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.Land Acquisition 1 Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 D 00 0,00 0.00
3.Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00
4.Contingency O.Oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.Equipment/Other o.ao 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL.COST: 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00
83
V: 1.08.0 Date:11111/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October.20111
Huntington Beach
Master Facilities Plan Project Detail
Infrastructure: Park Land Acquisition And Park Facilities Development
Project Number:/Title PK 020 Future Parks Acquisition(Possible Closed School Sites)
SubmiVing Departments: Community Services
Project Description:
Acquire approximately 28 acres of land suitable for development of active and passive parks such as including neighborhood,community
and sports parks. Potential sites would include closed school sites. Land acquisition is estimated at$20.00 per square foot or$871,120 per
acre.
Justification/Consequences of Avoidance:
The City needs to acquire approximately 100 acres in order to meet the General Plan target of 5.0 acres per 1,000 residents.
Relationship to General Plan Development:
The City's General Plan currently identifies a target of 5.0 acres of recreation opportunities per one thousand residents.
Allocation To General Plan Buildout: 0.00%
Reference Document:
Project Timing:
The project design is planned for 2010 and the construction between 2010 and 2020.
2015-16
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 through Build-out Total ail Years
1.Design/Engineering/Administrati< 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2. Land Acquisition/Right Of Way 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,488,000.00 24,488,000.00
3,Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.Contingency 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
5.Equipment/Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00
TOTAL COST: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,488,000.00 24,488,000.00
84
V:1.08.0 Date:11111/2011 Time: 2:14 PM Huntington Beach October,2011
End ®f Plan
85