HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional Exception (Variance) 88-29 - Robert Goebel - 162 r.
`;rti. 1• .a �
yplertt Ad00OW0116 of ON king.�1cw en putfMt �
aatN:ae tt brCM t1�.. suprrwr Court of Ordi County. I
CaNtorrog %WWW r A•61 1A. da100 29 Sraat.nrbW, 196 1. Old
A.102 t, OrIMr 1 t A". ttla3
STATE OF (3ALIFORN1A
County of oranpe •, •�..�. .d.-+ �.+�«
n ew r flow"M �+
." sop"mw�w.fin
I V
am a Citiaw of the Untied States and a residttrlt of C/
the Courtly aloresaid; 1 am over the ap of hlden
yev& OW not • party to or interested in the below
entitled matter. 1 ant a prificipai clerk of the Oiangs
Coast MLY PILOT. with whici. /d combined the
NEWS•PAESS• a newspeRwr of gwreral tdrewation,
printed and puMeho4 in the City of Costa MeW
County of Orange. State of California, and that a
Notice of BUW swrIM-1
of which cagy attached tweto is a true and complete
copy, was printed and published in the Costs Meu,
Newport Ch, Huntinpfon &uch► Ft,untain *V*W,
Irving, the South Coat communities and, Laguna
Beach issues of said newspapdr for
ConsOMIeve wee*s to wit the is (sf of
19d.
198
1dd
deWare, under penalty of perjury, that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on .r.,. Dec- 24
at Costa Mersa,, Califar a.
Sfp to e
q
0V
PROOF OF PUKX ATi N
4, .
46
VON
r '
40
1
,r
' CITY OF . HUWINa TM BEACH
,
2000 MAIN STREET CALI FO(iNIA 92648
OFFICE Of THE CITY CLERK
N
;i
January 5, 1989
,
Robert and Sheila Goebel
16201 Typhoon Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
The Huntington Beach City Council at Its regular meeting held January 3, 1989,
denied your application for Conditional Exception No. 88-29 acid granted the
appeal filed by Jdhn •Chang to the Planning Commission approval of said
Condi,tinnal Exception.
This io • final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to pro-
visions of Sectfon, 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedures of the State of
California you have ninety days from January 5, 1989, to apply to the
courts Fur ,judicial review.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please cell our office
at 536-5227.
MYr
Connie Brockway CHIC
City rierk
Cacao
Enclosures
CC: John Chang
City Attorney
City Administrator
Director Community Development
l� � y11
..71
r I'
REQUE FOR CITY COUNCIC ACTION
4
p J u a X 3`„_1,�,�89
imbiolhed Honorable Mayor and City Council
6ubssitm by: Paul Cook, rity Administrator
Pt' d by: Mike Co Adams, Acting Director, CowAn, ty Development
raj : APPEAL Of THE PINING CONMIS3ION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 90. 88-29
C* rt with Council Pauly? 19 l yes r ) Now policy or Exoeption C1, t `�
Shft, rrht of Ism, Raowr:nherhdatlan, Art•"is, Funding Source,AttNuMye Actla t, Attaehme u:
as
•
Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by John C.H. Chang
to- the, Planning Commission 's approval of Conditional Exception
. (Variance) No. 88-29. Conditional Exception No . 88-29 is a request
to permit a_ six (6) foot block gall to encroach five (5) feet into
the req' uired fifteen (15) foot front setback on a single family
reaidentiai lot.
Planning ,Q is siQU RgQ 5,L j, U- '
Planning Commission recommends that the City Council uphold the
action: taken by the Planning Commission on ,Bovember 15, 1988 by
denying the appeal and approving the request .
09 NDTION MAN BY SIAT88, 830090 BY BOURGUIOWN, THE Pk43NlAG
03=891(* OVERTCIR CA THE BONIN3 AMINIS` RATOk'S DENIAL AND APPROVED
CONDITIOUL NRIrEPrtOR (VARI&RCE) NO. 88-29 , WITH FINDINGS AND
CONDITION OFAPPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AM:. Slatos, Silva, Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon
NOW-' Livengood, Leipzig
ABOUT: None
ABSTAIN: Naee
1. Applicant ' s backyard faces onto a channel arid, because of that,
a public walkway along the Mack of this property was regui red by
the Coastal Commission . As the property owner has no primacy in
the rear yard, it is necessary to allow the applicant to fence
off his front and side yards to allow primacy by encroachment of
five feet in the front yard setback.
"o sm
1't
I
1r
^/ ' (\! ! Ian I''�y ^•• `' , Al Y•
t
v �
04,
•
36 -TM greating '.of the conditional ezception will not constitute a
taut of & 0�a 1a3 privilege inconsistent upon other properties
a the vieleaity and under identical sone 'classifications as
Nurse aro ot home - in the area that have either a structure
of gall at a ton foot front yard setback.
canting of a conditional exception to neasasery in order to
.pros*Cve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property
sights.
4t Top granting of ar conditional exception will not be mterially
h401trinotal to than public welfare or injurious to property in
t1Ao sawn* sone classification*
so Me granting of the conditional ezception will not adversely
effect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach,
C1llifoe�nib.
' -Tim of iPi aro► ;;;1 . ww
1. 'ate site plan received and dated November 1, 1988, shall be the
appfoved layout .
B. All neemeary permits shall be obtatiraed
31 Intensified landscaping shall be provided in front of the
subject wall *
4 . 442 building spoils, such an unusable lumber, wire, pipe and
other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an
bff—setae. to ellity equipped to handle them,
S . The pets red wall shall be architecturally compatible with a
aid j acen dwel liagn e
t
staff retoa■Mrrs.ds that the City Council grant the appeal and overturn �
thug Flsol.ng Cmmiaaeion' s action taken on November 18, 1986 by denying
Condltional szception (Variance) go, 89- 299
R
1. sus* of the size, iconfigu ration, shaepe' and lack of unique
topographic features of the subject property, gears does not
appear to be ezeeptional or eztraordinary eircuaatances or
conditions applicable to the land or promises involved that
Goals not apply generally to property or ciasm of uses in the
nano district.
2. Bince the subject property can be fully developed within
regular testablisbed setbacks, such a conditional exception in
not nGtesiary for the preservation &ad enjoyment of substantial
property rights . There is sufficient room for a pool and spa
behind the required 13 foot setback.
NC M 1/3/69 -2- (1790d)
L
•
SA, ' propose# weII within the 10 toot setback would be
ihcom st:bls Frith ,the adjacent ptopertius. The additi�►r
5 foot encroacbment would advorsely sifoct the view as seen by
the property directly to the southwest of the subject property.
d Azwptie►esl 011fouestances do not apply that deprive the subject
1prepegty of privileges en j oye4 by other properties in the same
S r gizassi!icat too.
VMS
App set: Robot* A 'bh ei l a Goebel
16201 Typhon Lane
Ntntington Bleach, CA 02549
1!►Milaelti Jobs C H. Luang
16212 T phoon Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
��i,�t s►rdtieerty=
041"Mm PLAN 098MATION: Low Density Residential
E RI--CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal
Zone)
L"D TiftI Single family dwelling
,
W o t ggA NoIrthsaMt Cl uI2,iect Pranartr
ORS UAL, PLUS MIGRATION:: Lori Density Residential
Zonal RI-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coadtai
zone)
iD CAE: Single family dwelling
Nnra�at,p,�,_ ,ie�Pra�rty;
Gann" PLAN 1128MATIOR: aperi space-water
ZOUS WR-CS- PP2 (rater Recreation-Coastal
• Zane-Ploodpl,ain)
LAID Vas Harbor channel
The applicants* Robert and Sheila Coebel, are requesting a 6 foot
high block gall in the front yard with a 18 gout setback so that a
pool and sps can be constructed in they front yard. The applicant 's
rear yard abuts & '•public walkway adjacent to the public channel.
The gear fence is wrought iron thus allowing risibility from the
walkway into the applicant ' s rear yard. Additionally, the applicant
believes that the subject property' s rear yard configuration
discourages a pool in that area . On September 21, 1988r the Zoning
Administrator denied Conditional Exception No. 88-29 with findings
(see Attachment 4) .
RAM - ?.ft/dq -8- (1790d)
Y
` I
S �
i
R �
I
y y
The applicant initiated an appeal to the Planning Commission bested
on their belief that the lack of privacy in the rear yard dick
constitute c lood-related hardship and that other properties in the
vicinity had been granted similar conditional exceptions (see
Attachment 3) . On November 15, 1988 the Planning Commission
concurred with the applicant and overturned the zoning
Administrator ' s denial by approving Conditional Exception No. 88-29
with findings and conditions of approval (see Attachment 5) .
The neighbor to the southwest, John C .H. Chang, submitted an appeal
to the City Council to overturn the Planning Commission' s approval
of Conditional Exception No . 88 -29 . His objection is based on the
affect the wall will have on his view from within his home and the
possible affect the wall will have on his property value (see
Attec'-wont 2) . The appellant states on his letter of appeal that
six homeowners within the vicinity have signed letters in opposition
to the proposed wall . no copy of these letters are cn file, however .
A thorough disc~uaeion of the history of the previously approved
similar variances in the vicinity and the arguments for and against
the request are contained in the attached Planning Commiss-.on Staff
Report dated November 15, 1988 ( see Attachment 6) .
M.,
The proposed b3ock wall is exempt pursuant to Class 5, S15305 from
the provisions of the California Environmental quality Act . In the
appellant 's letter of appeal, Mr . Chang states that the wall
requires an Environmental Impact Report (EIH) as no clear
categorical ezemption applies . Class 5, N7.5305 of CEQA states :
"Clans 5 cunt3.ats of minor alterations in land use
limitations in aroas with an average slope of less
than 20%, which do not result in any changes in lard
use or density, including but not limited to :
i u) Minor :.tit lii a adjustments , side yard, and net
hack variances not resulting in the creation of
any new parcel ;
(b) Issuance of minor encroachment permits;
(c) Reversioa to acreage in accordance with the
Subdivision Map Act . "
Subsec-tion 0) of Class S adequately applies to the proposed
structure and thus, does not requiri an EIR.
ECA - 1/3✓89 -4- ( 179Od)
,
Pursuant to §989 . 5 . 3 , b. 4 of the Huntington. Beach Ordinance Cade, the
proposed block wall is exempt from a Coastal Oavelopment Permit .
Mr . Chang , in his lat:tet, of appeal, has claimed that: the proposuc'
development; requires a Coastal. Development; Permit: . §989. S . 3 . b. 4
states that "Maintenance of or improvements to, existing
single-family dwell i.ngn o accessory uses and structures , and
landscaping are exempt, except the following which are not: exempt , "
(Several types of devalopment area listed including , "the
I construction, placement or establishment of any significant detached
structure such &6 a garage, fence, shoreline protective wcrkis , docks
or trees . *
Staff has determin2d that the. fence is not a " aiynificant:" structure
in relation to the Coastal Act:. The fence in no way limits access
to or affects the view of the channel as no access or view are
currently present: .
Not applicable.
ACTIQjjj:
The City Council may either ( a) uphold the Planning Commission' s
approval of Conditional Exception No. 88-29 and deny appeal of the
City Council and (b) overturn the Planning Commission' s approval of
Conditional Exception No. 80-29 and deny the request with findings
as recommended by staff .
1 . Area map
2 . Neighbor ' s letter of appeal to City Council dated
November 21 , 1988
3 . Applicent ' s letter of appeal to Planning Commissioa dated
September 24 , 1988
4 . Minutes from September 21, 1988 Zoning Administrator ' s meeting
5 . Draft Minutes from the November 19 , 1988 Planntag Commission
east i rig
6 . Planning Cocamiesion Staff Report dated Iovember 15 , 1988
i
I
MA:TR:gbm
RCA -- 1/3/89 - 5- ( 1790d)
' I
PIW
,1ArE �
RlIq
nzcz
� sent -- -- � .•,i J '_ ..4•. 'j In , .. !• i
Apo 001. op _001F
Rf-cZ oil &OPP1
'- 1olor,
M ; `�' #N•• �• E, ff'/ /f C� ��-77•Gce
C Q.'/i \ `�f 1I_ ♦�`./• � j `4
r R2•P0 ` ll
• ��' -
/111
oz
�}
Al
op—
OOF
Ar
o L' zz
at..�.
�Yfj, l 10
� � �l .,*icy t• /,C,,' 4 �' �y �� � � � �J i
WJiM WGTON MACH n AN4[!!4G DIVISION M+M+wGrw�.cr:
. t
• rl� . 7r .
1
.Ar- 7
RECEIVED
CITY CLiFft
JOHN a. S. CBMG V
U211 '' "boon Lams
Euntingt'on Beaoh, California 92649 NOV � �;� �Jf l d
November 22, 1983
City of Muntingtcn Beach City Council
City Clark' s Office
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, California 92648
Attention: No. Connie Brockway, City clerk
Subject: hppesl of Pla inning Commission 's averturr, of Zoning
Administrator' s denial of Conditional Exception
(VairiAnce) No. 88-29
(Request for a teen (10) foot front setback in 1 iaeu of a
fifteen (15) foot front setback for a six (6) foot high
block wall)
Dear Members of the City Council, City, Clerk:
This letter is to serve as an appeal to reverse thf decision of the
Planning Commission to overturn the Zoning Administrator' s den!.al
of Conditional Exception No. 88-29, which proposes a ten (la) foot
setback for a six (6) foot block wall to be erected in the front
yard of the property located at 16201 Typhoon Lane, Huntington
aaarch.
Enclosed plenso find a check in the amount of one hundred
sixty-five dollars ($165. 00) to cover the processing costs of the
appeal.
I respectfully request the hoaxing can this matter be delayed until.
mice-J'arnuary 1989, as my attorney has advised me that this is the
min ninum time required to prepare an adequate and complete
presentation of our came.
,Rations and 1192ndl.l,92CIW UIS
A. This applicant xaguests relief from the fifteen (15) foot front
setback in order to construct a pool in the front yard.
Presently there is suf f icisnt area f or at pool and spa of
aizilar also keehind the fifteen. (15) foot setback.
(Raft Community Development Staff Report, dated 11/15/88,
paragraph 9. 0)
+f N
ddW
1
City of Huntington Beach City Council Page 2
November 22, 1988
h. k six (5) foot wall at a ten ( 10) Foot setback will adversely
affect the front and side view from the kitchen doors and
windows of ry he mee. In all previously approved variance,,
cited by the applicant the adjacent property ' s views were not
affected. in two of the caes, garages were adjacent to the
approwsd block walls, and in one other c:.&*, the wall
encroachment was adjacent to a coastal access.
(Raf: Community Development Staff keport, dated 11115188 ,
paragraph 9. 0)
C. The property located et 3332 Venture, cited by the applicant
as a precedential example has a front yard pool with a six (6)
foot, wall within thu front setback. No variance was granted
for the wall ars no permit for the wall is on record with the
Department of community Development .
.
(Red f: Community Development S to f f Report, dated
paragraph 9.0)
D. Because of the size, configuration, shaper and lack of unique
topograpbics features of the subject property, Lhercz does not
appear to be e:zzz;ti,onal or extraordinatry circumstances or
conditions applicable to the land or premises involved that
do not apply generally to property or class of uses it the
sane district.
(Ref: Community Development Staff. Report, dated 11/15/88,
pardgiraph 10. 1)
S. The proposed wall within the fifteen ( 15) foot setback would
be incompatible with th* adjacent properties
(Reef: Community Development staff Peport, dated 11/15/881
paragraph 10. 3)
F. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the
subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in
the same zone classification.
(Ref: Convinity Development ;Aaff Report, dated 11/15/89,
paragraph 10 A)
d. Since the subject property can be fully developed within
regular established setbacks, such a conditional exception is
not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
substantial property rights. There is sufficient room for a
pool and spa behind the required fifteen (15) foot setback.
(Rot: Comunity Development Staff Report, dated 11/15/ft81
paragraph 10.3)
1
loom
•r�
City of Huntington Beach city Council Page i
November 22, 1988
i
K. A Coastal Devolvpment permit has not been obtained and is
required pursuant to Section 989 . 5 . 3 .b. 4 of the Huntington
Beach Ordinance Code.
I . An Environment Impact Report, required pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act has not been filed and
there it no clear indication that any categorical exemption
applies.
J. Six (6) neighboring property owners have exp+:esssd strenuous
objections, in writing, to the granting of the eanditio."jal
Exception. The written objections were signed by owners of
the properties located at 16211 Typhoon Lane, 16232 Typhoon
Lane, 16231 Typhoon Lane, 15221 Typhoon Lane, 3411 Sagamore
Drive, and 3402 Sagamure Drive.
K. The proposed structure %%101 he inharmonious and out of
keeping with the general plan for the uniform subdivision,
impzcvement and use of the properties as governed by the
covenLnts, conditions and restrictlens of the Trinidad Island
liomeowr&srs Association.
L. The proposed structure will have a negative effect on
neighboring property values.
M. The granting of conditional exceptions, particularly in
extreme situations as the one presently under consideration,
serves to undermine tP, e Intent end purpose of caning
regulations, encourages additional applications for variances,
and over time tends to destroy the offectivene®s, application
and substance of such regulations in a manner not contemplated
wii.hin the procodures established for creation aria/or
modification/deletion of zoning rules.
Based on the above stated g"ounds, I hereby make this appeal and
urge the Huntington Beach City Council to deny the proposed
v~.riance.
Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter.
v truly yoYr
ohn C. He man
JC RC:cd
' 1
16201 Typhoon LAne
Huntington Hach, Ca . 92649
September 24 , 1988
Gentlemen :
We are writing to appeal the decialon of the Huntington
Beech Zoning Administration of September 21, 2988 reaa►rding
II
Conditional Exception No . 88-29 rbgard ingc our home ai
16201 Typhoon Lane , Runtinaton Basch , Co . 92649 (,also mown
as TH 86360 Lot 31 parcel Number 178-731-04 8 .
We have enclosed our check � ,��� for 4,165 to cover processing
of our appeal.
We wish to build a skimming pool and spa in our front yard
arA require more room than the allowed 15 ' setback to install.
It . We cannot install the pool in the backyard because It
faces thn public walkway on Trinidad Island and we would have �
no privacy wh11e swimming. In addition , our pool man and
architect tell us that the backyard is too small , even for
& safell lane pool . The side yards are both also too small for �
a pool. We have worked extensively vi.th our architect and
pool man to sere if the pool and spR eon be installed within
a 15 ' setback and they say it carpi due to the position of the
douse and the structural pilasters supporting the roof. We
honestly feel that not having some relief from the 15 ' setbRok
rule would deprive our family of privacy and our three: children
of the ability to enjoy the pool they have been looking• forward
to.
We realize that the Zoning Admin} stration did not feel
that our camp represented a hardship under strict technical
guidelfneg , but we feel that in a practical sense it does .
We know that there are Four other homes , the later three
of which are on the public walkway and have been granted
variances for this exact same reason + walkway access in backyard .
We would request that you consider these precedents when
you consider our request . Below to a list of the address of
thee* other homes ,
As your can see from our plans, we have worked closely
with an architect and pool man II:o assure that this enhancement
of our property would be a►esth"ically appealing and harmonious
with the surrounding community.
16.122 Sundanoor
3402 tare- walkway house
3302 Venture + walkway horse
3332 Vonture a walkway
We thank you in advance for your oonsldeeration to this matter.
no Go Min IN Wwwwr, JA
,
HU 1GJQNgEACH QEEJCE QF.7(1NG ADMMISTRU011
Roorn B-6 r- Civic Center
2000 Main Stre(..t
Huntington Beach, CA 02643
1:30 P.M.
j.JNG Al2H 151M][0,g: Michael Strange
I
STAF,F„MUM: Thomax Rogers
MMIES: Minutes of the September 14, 1988 Zoning Administrator's Meeting
were continued to September 28, 1988
REGULAR AGENDA.11EMS:
CONDIT ONAL EXC;.1c'' $J 29 - ConSiolieci.If= September` 7. 1988
Applicant: Rober: and Sheila Goebel
This request is covered by Categorical Exempt;on, Section 15305, Class 5, California
Envirenmentai (duality Act, 1986.
Staff member, Thomas Rogers, reported that this is a request for a ten (10) ft. front
setback in lieu of a fifteen (15) f't, front setback for a six (6) ft. high block wall.
(Applicant is requesting a. pool in the front yard), located at 16201 'Typhoon Lane. Mr.
Rogers stated that th,% applicant supplied a list and pictures of other properties on
Trinidad Island that have had conditional exceptions granted for a 10 ft. setback. Staff
determined that these were approved at the Board of Zoning Adjustments level by a split
vote, with the planning representative always voting against it. The Planning Department
has consistently taken a strict Interpretation of what a land related hardship 'evolves.
h x r neighbors� Additionally, Mr. Rogers stated that the next door had sent a letter to Mike
Strange and himself strongly protesting the additional encroachment into the front yard
setback. Mr. Rogers stated that st-iff Is recommending denial.
II
The public hearing was opened and Mr. and Mrs. Goebel, applicants, were present and
spoke to support of the request. �I
Dave Rukatalis, rWesenting Mr. Chang (applicant's nei iibor)� spoke against tahe request.
There was no am else present to speak for or against the request so the public hearing
was clams.
CONDrMNAL EXCEPTION NO. 88-29 wAS rxml) BY THE ZONINC
ADMVMRAT04 WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
I. pause of the aiae, c onfi*uration, shape and lack of union t a is features of
the subjt.property, there doea not appear to be exceptlonal or extraordinary
cirtacs or condition: applicable to the land or premises involved that does
not ep*fitly to property or class of in the same district
to Mar 7/21/88 —lam 4 2h
I
6
LIN
. i
DRAFT
6-2 appm. or zoNaa aDmisi6T ATOR,B z2ara or CON ITIONAI. XXCEPTIQN
` APPLICANT, ROBERT & SSE I LA GOEBEL
Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 88--29 is a request to permit a 6
toot high block Wall to encroach 5 feet into the reguirad 15 foot
front setback located at 16201 Typhoon Lar1e. On September 22 , 1988,
the gaming Aftinintrator denied Conditional Exception (Variance) No.
88-29 with findings. Submitted for your consideration is the
applicant ' s aypesl to the action taken by the Zoning Administrator.
The proposed project ka exempt pursaant to Clans 5, Section 15305 of
the California Environmental Quality Act .
MASTAL �s
The subject property is Ic: ated within the appealable at.---ion of the
Coastal Zone . The project is exempt from a Coastal Development Permit
pu;'rsuant to Section 989 . 5 . 3 . b.4 of tha Huntington Beach ordinance Code .
� ��►�'1"�r �.wnATr�
I
Deny the appeal and uphold the Zoning Administrator 's denial of
Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 88- 29 with :inklings .
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
Robert Goebel, applicant, presented photographs of other tomes in the
area that were granted exceptions and spoke in support of the
request. He said his family would like to construct a swimming pool
and that because of his lack of privacy in his back yard due to the
public accema/walkway it is necessary to build in his front yard . He
said the extension of the front wall would allow him to have patio
furniture and enough room to enter his front entryway without strapping
into the, pool .
James Sapp, pool contractor representing the applicant, spoke in �
support of the request . He said the proposed pool is very small yet
has an aesthetically pleasing design.
David kakstalis Jr. , representing the appellant , John C. H . Chang,
said his client sent letters to the surrounding neighbors and twelve
responded by objecting to the proposed extension of the block wall.
He distributed photographs to the Commission showing the blockage of
Kr. Chang 's ♦ie+s. He also presented photographs of the ether homes in
the area that were granted variances that do not block views . He
fools the variances will have adverse effects on the homes in the area .
r1�1a��'1
PC minutes - 11/15/88 -7- ( 1.629d)
+mow i r
Shaile Goebel , 162U1 Typhoon Lane, said an additional five feet will
not block Mr . Cheng 's view. She said she had aroken with the Changs
and was told they would not object to the request and is surprised
that he has contacted the neighbors to stop the construction .
There were no other persons present to speak for or against the
request and the public hearing was closed .
It was felt that since the applicant ' s backyard faced onto the channel
and a public walkway was required by the Coasted Commission, he was
deprived of privacy in the rear yard and that a variance of five feet
in the front yard setback should be allowed for privacy.
Conaraissionere lielpsig and Lfvengood felt that the existing codes and
rules should apply and be upheld.
.A NOTION WAS FADE BY SLATES, SECOND BY BOURGUIGFON, TO OVERTURN THE
DENIAL AND APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VAR1A10CE) NO. 88--29 , WITH
FINDINGS AND CONKTIONS OF APPROVAL , 8Y THE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: Slates, Silva , Ortega, Higgins, Bourguignon
HOES: Livengood, Leipzig
ABSENT: None
ABSTAXN: none
UM AS
JrrNA ,JQJJ F0&.-AJ'PROVAL:
1 . Applicant ' s backyard faces onto a channel and, because of that,
a public walkway along the back of this property was required by
the Coastal Commission . As the property owner has no privacy is
the rear lard , it is necessary to allow the applicant to fence
off hi$ front and side yards to allow privacy by encroachmenh of
five feet in the front yard setback.
2 . The granting of the -onditional exception will not coLstitute a
grant of a special privilege inconsistent upon other properties
in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications as
there are other home:; in the area that have either a structure
or wall at a ten foot front yard setback.
3 . The granting of a conditional exception is necessary in order to
preaarve the enjoyment of one or more substantial property
rights.
4 . The granting of a conditional exception will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to propert? in
t'he same tone classification .
S. The granting of the conditional exception will not adversely
affect the General Plan of the City of liuntitgton Beach,
California.
PC Minutes - 11/15/88 (1629d)
I
CONDITTONA Or
Y, 'khe mite plan received and dated November 1, 1988, shall be the
approved layout.
Z . All necessary permits shall be obtained .
3 . latensi.f i*d landscaping shall be provided in front of the
sub3e:ct wall.
a . All building spoils, much as unusable lumber# hire, pipe and
other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an
off--mite facility equipped to handle them.
5. The proposed wall shall be architecturally compatible with
adjacent dwellings .
i
I
•
FCC Ninutoe 11/15/88 -9- (1629d)
i
•t
r
4¢ t' F.
huntinglon beach department of community development
SrAff
EPORT......-
V: Planning Comission
#RON: Connwinity Development
DATE: November 15, 1988
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR' S DEAIAL OF CONDITIONAL
EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO . 88-29
APPLjj=/ Robert & Sheila Goebel RAII ACCEPTED:
16201 Typhoon Laney September 24 , 1988
Hunt . Beach, CA 92649
MANDATQBY PRQC 6 S,I NG DATE:
A ten (10) font front November 23, 1988
setback in lieu of a
fifteen (15! foot front ZONE: R1-CZ (Low Density
setback for a six (6) Residential-Coastal Zane)
foot high block wall .
QENE$AL PLAff: Low Density
LO ATIM: 16201 Typhoon Lane Residential
aMAM". 6 , 000 squarer feet (:net) ,EXISTING USE : Single Family
Dwelling
1_Q SUS, ESTED._ACI^ :
Deny the appeal and uphold the Zoning Administrats: : ' s denial of
Conditional Exception (variance) No . 88-29 with finings .
2 . 0 GZRZRAL INFORMATIQN:
Conditional Exception (valiance) No . 88-29 is a request to permit a
6 foot high block wall to encroach 5 feet into the required 15 foot
front setback. on September 21, 1988 , the Zoning Administrator
denied Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 88-29 with findings .
Submitted for your consideration is the applicant ' s appeal to the
action taken by the Zoning Administrator .
2-0 .fiUMUNDINQ L & .r_ ZON AND gXNf RAC 12LAII D 9N&TIONS :
QSNL2M PLAN DESICHATION: Low Density Residential
EOIAICI 91-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal
Zone)
IJUM USE Single family dwelling
MIT - A 4 M_436
• ram..
l uthyngk - AgM;haast ,Ana fiortheafit of SUbr & t _PraparLy:
t#lY;1 MAL PLAZA DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
ZOM R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal.
Zone)
LARD USN: Singles family dwelling
JJgXEhwnat, QL sUbjegt Fr2pAlty:
GENERAL PLAN DESIONATrON: Open Space-Water
ZONE: WR-CZ--FP2 (Water Recreation-Coastal
Zone-Floodplain)
LAND USE: Harbor channel
4AD _ FEM(IRDMEML� STATir�:
The proposed project i.r exempt pursuant to Class 5 , Secw{ on 15305 of
the California Environmental Quality Act .
A J C=T,B,L 9TATM,
The subject property is located within the spi-ealable section of the
Coastal Zone. The project is exempt from a Coastal Development
Permit pursuant to Section 989 . 5 . 3 .b.4 of the Huntington Beach
Ordinance Coda.
5. o ,R�LQP ATUS: Not applicable.
7. b EPECIFIC MAN: Not applicable
A,. 0 lSUSDIVT iQCOi�1ITTEE; Not applirablet.
� ISSUES AND A 'U�1£�I�
The applicant is requesting a 6 foot high block wall in the front
yard with a 10 foot setback so that a pool and spa can be
constructed in the front yard . The applicant 's rear yard abuts a
public walkway adjaeeat to the public channel . The rear fence is
wrought iron thus allowing visibility from the walkway into the
applicant ' s reaz yard. Additionally, the applicant argues that the
subject: property' s rear yard configuration discourages a pool in
that area . ft open space is repaired in the rear yards of homes
that back up to public channels. As a result, the house sects back
13 .5 feet from the rear property line on one s We and 18 feet on the
other. For these two reasons, the lack of privacy in the rear yard
and the rear yard configuration, the applicant desires to construct
a pool in the front yard and requests relief from the 15 foot front
setback for the required wall . It should be :,►oted that there is
sufffoieat area for a pool and spa of si,ttui.lar size behind the 15
foot setback. The pool would need to be redesigned dnd the deck
area etould hatte to be reduced significantly,
Staff Report - 11/15/88 (1593d)
1
1,
63varal lots in the innnodiate vicinity of the subject proparty have
pools in the front yard enclosed by walls that encroach into the
front setback. The applicant, in their letter appealing the Zoning
Adininit,trator ' s denial , lists four addresRes that have walls within
the front setback. The applicant believes Chat , since the precedent.
has already been set , their va iance roqu8st should likewise be
granted .
It should be noted that the Planning De-oartment recommended denial
for those variances that were previously granted . The first one
cited by the applicant (16322 Sundancer - Conditional Exception No .
84-6) was granted by the Board of Zoning Adjustments by a majority
decisien with the planning Department representative voting against
the request., At 3302 Venture Drive, a variance to allow a 6 foot
wall within the front setback (Conditional Exception No . 54-66) was
granted by the Hoard cf Zonisig Adjustments by a majority vote, again
with the Pleniag Representative to tha board voting against the
request. At 3402 Venture a variance for a wall encroaching Into the
front &etback (Conditional Exception No . 86-94 ) was denied by both
the Board of Zoning Adjustments and the Planning Commission. The
denial, however, was overturned on appeal to the City Cc.uncil . The
final property listen by the applicant as having a wall within the
front setback, 3332 Venture, was not granted a variance nor is there
o permit for the wall on record with the Departm3nt of Conumuni.ty
Development ; a permit four the swimming pool , however , was issued .
The neighbor to the aouth4goat at 16211 Typhoon, :4r . John -.. H.
Chang, submitted a letter to the Planning staff in opposition to the
applicant ' s request (see attaciimernt) . ,Additionally, w
representative for Mr. ChL4g, Mr. Dave Rukstalis , spoke in
opposition to the subject proposa' . The basis of their opposition
is that a 6 foot; wal'. at a 10 foot setback would adversely affect
their front and side view from the kitchen doors and windows . The
nG..ghbor ' s house is stet back. approximately 35 feet . The proposed
wall would limit their view. It should also be noted that in all
the previously approved variances referenced above , the adjacent
propNrty ' s views were not affected . In two of the cases, garages
were adjacent to the approved bleck walls and in the other case, the
wall encroachment was adjacent to a coastal accessway.
I,, Q:RECQJ=NQ&T1OH;
S4% aff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the appeal and
uphold the Zoning Administrator ' s denial of Conditional Exception
(Variance) No. 88-29 witn the following findings :
FIN jHGA FO_It ,U 7AL :
1 , Because of the size, configuration, shape and lack of unique
topographic features of the subject property, there does not
appear to be exception4l or extraordinary circumstances or
Conditions applicable to they land or premises involved that
does not apply generally to property or class of uses in the
same district .
Staff Reyort 11/15/88 -3- (1593d)
+r
2 . Since the subject property can be fully dove )ped within
regular eat bliahecl setbacks , such a conditional exception is
not neceseaary f_ar the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights , There it sufficient roorn f'o�: a pool and spa
behind the required 15 foot setback .
3 . The proposed wall within the 15 toot ,.tietback would be
incompatibles with the adjacent properties , The additional
5 foot encroachment would adversely affect the view as seer by
the property directly to Lhe iiouthwest of the subject property.
4 . Exceptional Circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same
zone classification.
13. ,,Q ALTERNAT1VE ACj=.*
The Planning Corinission may approve ' t.he appeal and overturn: the
Zoning Administrator ' s denial of Conditional Exception (variance)
' } No. 88-29 with findings and conditions of approval .
+
I, 1 . Area reap
2 . Zoning Administrator minutes dated September 21 , 1988
3 . Applicant ' s letter of appeal elated September 24 , 1988
4 . Neighbor ' s letter of opposition dated September 16 , 1988
I
SH:T : k1a
Skaf! Report _ 11/ 5/88 M.4- (1593d)
i
OINyEPw-
Vve
,. �;.`�� j - �.� =.�.� '• L • �17"al_cz
IL
ir
[RI-CZhnl-c?)/
1
lo
• �!�/` .d / + ��-��.-•�4.'1• � �. /�1��l�, �.µ.C.•L �. -�•('•• � >'�4l•�t /� �, �fjf.�,/` o f
A• 111
ALJ /•�r�l / Ill' Cl�.- �c� C s % s
'.RN. .
� ��,�� •r•Elm � C � l,•,�t�, � l! /Ij �?,� fj ��, 1� '; 1�
c •. r/ � fir_ �. ti
-
NOf
„f;. \\`` // ,p '%. •rl, // If�`�\ �'j a �a% I/�/ i/n` 1.�,76L�/` �
CEAPPO
f1
lob
_-{
lRhi�;if�Ml HUNTM�iKsTON BEACH PLANNNAG DI-VISloi i �,IQr
f
y
1, V i
b,N ,
�3;�I�12��'�� ��A.���.1�1�.��'��.I�ZNc Ao�lr�►.+.�.'�3.AT�
Room B -6 Civic Center
2000 Main Street
Huntington Beach, CA 02648
7D,YM =TKATQR: Michael Strange
SWI ME1MBE U: Thomas Rogers
MjNUIF.S: Minutes of the September 14, 1988 Zoning Xdminis .rator's Meeting
were continues, to September 28, 1998
.AQENd_A.ITEMS:
CONQUIQNAL EXCEPTOOL NQ, 88-29 -- Cc2ntIr=d- orn September Lila
Applicant: Robert and She'.la Goebel
This request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Section 15305, Class 5, California
Environmental Quality Act, 1986.
Staff memb,- Thomas Rogers, reported that this iE a request for a ten (10) ft. front
setba-A in lieu of a fif teen (1 S) ft. front setback for a six (6) ft. high block wall.
(Applicant is requesting a pool in the front yard), located at 16201 Typhoon Lane. Mr.
Rogers stated that the applice.nt supplied a list and pictures of other propertles can
Trinidad Island that have had conditional exceptions granted for a 10 ft. setback.
determined that these were approved at the Board of Zoning Adjustments level by a split
vote, with the planning representative always voting ,against it. The Planning Department
has consistently taken a strict interpretation of what a land related hardship involy-ri.
Additionally, Mr. Rogers ,stated that the next door neighbors had sent a letter to Mike
Strange and himself strongly protesting the additional encroachment into the front yard
setback. Mr. Rogers stated that staff is recommending denial.
The public hearing was opened and Mr. and Mrs. Goebel, applicants, were present and
spoke in support of the reque-it.
Dave Rukstalis, representing Mr. Chang (applicant's neighbor), spoke against tahe request,
There was no one else pr esent to speak for or against the request so the pi 'tic he-iring
was closed.
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 88-29 WAS DENIED BY THE ZONING
ADbGNISTRA.TOR WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS:
+, •
I. muss of the size, confiSuration, sihaps and lack of unique topographic features of
the s*Jest property, there does not appear to be exceptional or extraordinary
cbvu=t*r4ft or aoaditions applicable to the land or premises Involved that does i
sot apply PWally to p9VPWty or class of uses In the same district.
zA Mimto 7/21/88 4102h
ilk K
a 1
T. Since the subject property can be fully dr-velaped within regular established
setbacks, such a Conditional 12,xreption is no, necessary f,,ir the preservation and
enjoyment of subs tan tla 1 property rights.
3. Thi proposed wall within the 15 ft. setback would bi; incompatible with the adjacent
properties. The additional 5 ft. encroachment would adversely affect the view as
teen by the property directly to th- southwest of the subject property.
4. Exceptional circumstances do not apply that deprive the subject property of
privileges enjoyed by ether properties in the sarr.(% zone oassirications.
I
Applicant: Valerie K. Carroll
T request is covered by Categorical Exemption, Sectic,i 1531;, Class 1 California
Env nrnental Quality Act, 1986.
Staff me ber, Thomas Rogers; reported that t'-ds is a request to su vide one tot and a
portion of lot into two parcels io�;a ted at 1217 Acacia. Mr. Rog s stited th;tt a title
search had n provided showing that the additional five feet w obtained legally prior
to the City's S ivislorr Ordinance going into effect. He stat that the proposed lots
meet code as to outage pnd area and stated that staff is re mmending aoproval.
The applicant, Vaier K. Carroi!, was present and spoke i . support of the request.
TENTATIVE PARCEL P NO. 88-309 WAS APPRO D BY THE ZONING
ADMINISTRATOR WITH . E FOLLOWING FINDIN AND CONDITIONS:
FIN12ING I:O"P.1'.ROMAL:
1 . The proposed subdivision of o (2) p cels for purposes of residential use is in
ompliance with the size and pe property necessary for that type of
development.
2. The General Plan has set for provis ns for this type of land use as well as setting
forth objectives for Imple station of is type of use.
3. The property was prev ly studied for this ' tensity of land use at the time the
land use designation r Townlot Specific Pla lstrict allowing residential
buildings was plat on the subject property.
4. The size, dept frontage, street width and other de n and improvement features
of the d subdivision are proposed to be constr ted in compliance with
standards ns and sped rlcations on file with the City well as in compliance
with the ate Map Act and supplemental C;ty Subdivisio Ordinance.
A. BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO USE OR OCCUPANCY OF SAI ARCELS FOR
Y PURPOSE:
Tha Tentative Parcel Map received by the Department of Community velvpment
an July 19, 199S shalt be the approved layout.
Z. A pam1 map shrill be Mad with and approved by the Department of Publle ks
and recorded with the Onne C&Aty R.ee deer.
ZA MbwM 7/21/83 4103h
*,
162C1 Typhoon IAne
Huntington Beach , Ga . 2649
September 24 , 190
Gentlemen ;
;We tkre writing to a7ppsl the decision of MtiP ijuntin,_.ton
"each 2oninw kdministratior. of Septauibpr 21 , 1988 revardi^fi
Coral itior_al 21ception No . 88-29 rewarding our hove eLt
16201. Typhoon Lane , Huntinrton Beach , Ca . 925L9 (also knowr-
as TR 6-` 36 , Lot 31 ARrcpl ::ur�t=Pr 778-?31�Of� 8W have enclosed our check � yJ�� fcr 1•165 to cover processlr.E
of our appeal .
Ne wish to build a swimming pool and spa in our front: y%rd
and requirp more room than the al:lowRd 15 ' setback to install
It . We cannot; install tre pool in the backyard becausq it
faces the public walkway on Trinidad Island end we would have
no privacy whi1p swl.mminw . In eddition , our pool rran and
architect tell us that the bec �yerc is too small , ,?iren for
e small lane pool . T's-e side; ,yards fires both also too small for
a rnol . .de hale worked extensively with our archite: t and
tool Tarn to see if the pool and spa can by ir.stallad wl`.-hin
a 15 ' setback anal they say it can ' t due to the position of the
house 9nd the structural pilasters sucportlna the roof . We
hcn"stly feel. that not having some relief from the 15 ' setback
rule would deprive our farily of privacy and otar three children
of the ability to enjoy the pool, they have been lockin? forward
to .
', a realize that the Lonin- :�,1:6.nlstratIon did not feel
that ;gar crisp r- ::resentad a hardshto under strict technical
.:ulelelir_es , but wp feel +!gat in a practical sen.ae it does .
We know that there ,are four other homes , the later three
of which are on the public walkway and have been granted
v::.-rlair'ne'!s for this exact same reason - walkway access in taeckyard .
We would request that you consider these precedents when
you conaider our request . Below is a list of the address of
theap other homAs .
As you can see from our plans , we have worked close ;ly
with an architect and pool man to assure that this enhancement
of our property would be anathptically appealing and harmonious
with the surrounding community .
16322 Sundancer
3402MCure- walkway house
3302 Ventura - walkway house
3332 Venture - walk-ray
We thank you in advance for your consideration to this matter*
w
r� fit. ltr �
� r,
w
I I
"r' NIALS DIVISION
N septa,mbar 1s, l�Dae
.JOHN C, 11.CHAN43 "
Wont
Office of zoning Administrator
City of Huntington Beach, Californln
.Manning Department
2000 Kain Street
Huntington Beach , CA 92648
Attention: Mr. Aichael Strange, Zoning Administrator
Subject: Conditicnal, Exceptio-1 No. 88-29, regarding request fo* a ten
(10) ft. front Setback in lieu of a fi::teen ( 15 ) ft. i:ont
setback for a six - (6 ) ft. high block wall . (Applicant is
i,equesti.ng a pool in the front yard) .
Gear Mr. Strange,
I wish to take this opportunity to express my most strenucus objection to
the subject proposed variance , My concerns are being presented to you in
writing in advance of the planning meeting scheduled for. 3epLember 21 , 1988,
since due to prier buainesa+ commitments, I will regretfully riot be able to
personally attend.
The property for which the six (6 ) foot wall is proposed is located at 16201
Typhoon Lane. The property adjacent t•j the proposed wall location is at
16211 Typhoon Lane and is my perflonal residence. I have resided there with
my family for approximately seven ( 7 ) years.
The proposed wall, if built, will permanently block the front view and side
view existing from my kitchen doors and windows . If the variance is allowed,
this view will be further obstructed. The wall, if extended an additional
five ( 5) feet will become a visual nuisance, not only as seen from my property,
but aiso as seen from the street.
It is my fires belief, such a wall will serve to cause depreciation of property
valuees, affecting not only my own, but neighboring properties as well.
I therefore wish to urge the City of Huntington Beach to disallow the proposed
variance.
Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter. If I can further
&exist in any manner, please do not hesitate to call me at (714)850-0668,
during normal working hours.
a truly yours,
ohn C. yang
t rreesident, R17Cd teriaio Division
Sae Hr. fho s Ro"rs, A�dministrati • Alde Y1~
WMO MAIM"plNd1O1i M 0 1221 L OM AW,GUMI I I&•ll!"fl'A AM CA 66M
t i
l i sh I L112C/38' ooe-Qr MUM-
APPEAL OF PLANNING CaHNISSION' S AVPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO . 88-29
NOTICE 1S HERUY GIVEN that the Hunti�tgton Beach City Council will
i hold. a public bees. i ng in the Council Chartiber at the Huntington Heach
Civ;►c Csnter, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,. California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persona who wish to be her rd relative to the
application described below.
��--
IMULI_ � Tuesday, January 31 1969 7 ; 00 PM - ----
APU1CA',I(73 NUM I: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s approval of
Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 88-29
APpL3CAN'f/
ApPEZ�LAN Robert and Sheila Goebel/John C.H. Chang
W ►T 16201 Typhoon Lane
ZQNE: R1-•CZ (Low Density Resid3ntfal-Coastal Zone)
$ T: To allow a sic (6) foot block wall to encroach five
(5) feet into the required fifteen (15) foot setback
on a single family residential. lot .
IROMMU L SxA Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15305 , Class 5, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
CABAL ETA=: The proposed blockwall is within the appealable
portion of the C,,,,stel Zone (exempt from a
Coastal. bevelopmenl- Permit pursuant to Section
9a9 .5 .3 of the Huntington Peach Ordinance Code) .
On EIIA: A copy of the proposed request in on file in the City
Clerk' s office, 2000 N:.An Street , Nuntington Beach,
California 92648 , for inspection by the public. A copy
of the staff report will be available to interested
parties at City Mall or the Main City Library (7111
Talbert Avenue) .
ALL IMMRZSTSD PERSONS are invited to attend said hear: .,g and l
espreas opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call
Thomas Rogers, Administrative Aide lip at 536-5271 .
DATED: 12/14/88 CONNIE BROCKWAY
(155'�d-1) CITY CLERK
CITY OF HUNTINGtON BELCH
- - ,
r
APPEAL OF PLANNTNG COMISSION ' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION ('VARIANCE) �C . 80-29
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council wi11
hold a public hearing in the Council Chambar at the Huntington Peach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Ha4ae:ti , California , on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
aapplication described below.
P2 .-' r: Tuesday, January 3 , 1989 , 7 : 00 PM
}�2uiva t7I _mmi: Appeal of 1,31anning Commission' s approval of.
Conditional Exception (Variance ) No . 88-29
SLAM: Robert and Sheila Goebel/John C .H. Chang
LQ!i
" 16201 Typhoon Lane
ZONC., Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential--Coastal Zone)
RE(WEST: To allow a six (6) foot block wall to encroach five
(5) feat into the required fifteen ( 15 ) foot: setback
on a single family residential lot ,
ENYMM ITALM RE: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15-05, Class 5 , of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COMM SAS: The propoaed blockwa,ll is within the appealable
portion of the Coastal Zone (exempt from a
Coastal Development: Permit pursuant to Section
989 . 5 .3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinances Code) .
S?.N•..FIL10. A copy of the proposed request is (in file in the City
Clerk' s office, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach,
California 92648 , for inspection by the public . A copy
o,f the staff report will be available to interested
parties at City )fall or the Main City Library ( 7111
Talbert Avenue) .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
eaxprees opinions or submit evidences for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any further questions please call
Thomas Rogeraa , Admini8traat:ivea Aides 11, at 526-5271 ,
DATED: 12/14/88 CONNIE BROC KWAY
I CITY OFHUNTINGTON BEACH
Willis® Gregory Warnr r r Vinreitt T Paglia ;H,srbour-Pacific Ltd ,
3741 Swaecat+e Dr 3295 Tempe Or 7ohn C. Green
Huntit tdn Beach, ' CA 92649 I"'NsntlngLort Beech, CA 92649 "'N301 Tempe Dr
78-?0 -42 f 178-70&-04103 Aunt�ngton beacht CA 9loay
178-706-17
Marc J Litt i Harbour-Pacific Ltd. Keith X. Cowles
3327 Tempe Dr John 13. Frankl:1q, Jr 13299 Tempe Dr
Huntington he$_h , CA 92649 ;3304 Tempe Dr ((� Hcint•ingtcn BhAch, CA 92649
178-705-43 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 i 178-706-18
,
1.78-706-65 i
Harbour.-Pacific Ud
Harbour-Pacific Ltd � Stan Conrad
Robert L. Jarrard Vincent Puglia � 3295 Tempe Dr
3325 Tempe Dr 3308 Tempe Dr ! Huntington Jae_-ch, CA 9261,9
Huntington beach, CA 9 649 Huntington beam, C�. 92640 178-706-.19
l 78--705-44 178-706-C6; 07;
Christine G Stagge Harbour-Pacific :td
3323 Tempe Dr R..tald L' Brown I 3293i Tempe
am B TDrta
Huncington Beach, CA 92.649 3.31.2 Tempe Dr i Huntington Beach, CA 92649
178-705-45 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 � 178-706-20
176--706-09
Caarge William Kay Harbour--Pacif is Ltd Westchester Bay Homeowners Ass,
480 Lake Rd Partridge Developments Co P.O:Box 1863
Wrighttwood, CA 92397 P.O.Bax 9473 I luntington Beach, CA 92647
178-705-46 Fountain Vallev, CA 92 728 17$-706-39
178 -706-10 f
i
William J. Rhodes Carmen De:rtino ' harbour -Pael fi c Ltd
16146 Twinkle Cir 3315 Tempe Dr � Trinidad Isle Homeowners
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Leach, CA 92649 I p,0,13ox 1761
178-705-47 178-706--11 Huntington Beach, CA 92647
178-721-01;U2
Clyde S Williams peter Maypr .John P. Mar.tasevich, Jr
16147 Twinkle Ci 28092 Or8o:l a 34 01 Sagamore Dr
Huntington )leach, CA 92647 Misslon Viejo, CA 92692 HL.lLingLon Reach, CA 92649
1 88-705-48 178--706-12 178-721-03
Wc�tchester flay Homeomiers Ronald L' Kent Stanley Sze-Chuen Tseng
P.O.Box 1863 Assn. 3309 Tempe Dr 3411 Sagazore Dr
Huntington. Beach, CA 92649 kuntitt ton Beach CA 92649
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 1 i ti-706-13 $ '
178-705�-95 178--711-04
Harhour-Pacific Ltd Harbour-Pacific Ltd.Partnershi
Mohamm�nd Shaff P Kirk B Aashore
3307 Tempe Dr •3421 Sagamore Der
20Templarawd
20 Dr ngo NJ 0706p Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington '3each, CA 92649
lia178..706-qt 178-706-14 i 17ESw121-05
Sharon K Sadler Harbour-PacifI.c Ltd Robert C L&Bayne
3292 Tempe Dr 3305 Tempe Dr 3431 Sagamore Dr
fjuntiuSton Beach, CA 92647 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649
178-70642 178-706-15 � 178-721-06
�� �+� f Alan D Sterling Grant C Loco at t1,
I 3303 T Dr 3441 Sagamoira Dr
►t ton beach, CA 92649 IHuatin g,tor► beach, CA 92649 I Huntington Beach, CA 92649
is y -p3 Y78w70Gµ16 178-721-07
On..
Joan K. Johnson Harbour-Pacif ic: Ltd ' liarbour-PacMfi,c Ltd
vacant land
U9 mlirldge Capital Group r �. James R. Traudt
178 .0 O16 043 5 Pullman St �3363 Tempe Dr
Santa Ana, CA 92705 Kuncington Beach, CA 92649
17t3'-70`)-10 1.78-705•-32
Harbour-Pacific Ltd Atin Scott Hobert Stein
3025 wympic Blvd Cambridge Cap!t-_al trout) 3:161. Tempe Dr
Santa Monica, CA 90404 1943 S T'u11;ttan St Ilttrtt ingt:ott Beach, CA y2749
178-700�-07 ;08 Santa Aria, CA 92?05 178-705--33
178-705-10
City of Huntington Beactt Ilarbour--Paelfic Ltd. kichard E 11^Imes
P.O.6ox 1.90 Philip J. Randazzo 3357: Tempe Dr
Runtinpton Beach, CA 92648 :3358 Tempe Dr Hont.ingron 113onch, CA `_,2649
178-iOtl-11 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 1718-705-34
178-•705-11
Herbour-Pacific Ltd. Harbour-Pacific Ud Joan A. Johnson
Harchs 'rohill Elie Shuhalbar 3355 Tempe Dr
3480 Hol.lyb_rry Trail, 2502 grand Ave Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Vista, CA 92084 Covina, CA 917-14 178--705-35
178-705-01 178--705-12
Mark S Getting Parbour-Pacific Lid Ja-:�tluelyn A Windle
3322 Tempe Dr John 0 Alley 3351 Tempe Dr
Huntington BP.ach, CA 92647 3362 Tempe I)r littntington Beech, CA 92649
178-705-02 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 178--705-36
178•-705•-1.3
Harbour-Pacific Ltd Barbour--Pacific Ud Ilarbour-Pacific Ltd
i
Ronald W. Davis, et al. Gerald T Olson Michael D Smith, Et al.
3324 Tempe Dr 3366 Tempe Dr 3347 Tempe Dr.
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649
178--705-03 178-705-14 17► --705-37
Barbour-pacific Ltd Harbour-Pacific Ltd Michael. E Allen
Marappa Y Gopinoth Marshal. F, Lundgren 3345 Tempe Dr
10072 High Cliff Dr 3372 Tempe Dr Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Santa Ana, CA 92705 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 178--705-38
1.78-705-04 1.78--705-15
Harbour-Pacific Ltd Harbour-Pacific Ltd Richard A Outwater
lansuelo H. Bourman Harty R Heartman S., 3345 Tempe Dr.
1332 Tempe Dr 4442 York #8 Huntington '.each, CA 92649
iuntington Reach, CA 92649 Los Angeles, CA 90041 178-705-38
.78-705-06 178-•705-16
laul R Lesage Harbour--Pacific Ltd , et n1 Harbour-Pacific Ltd
1336 Tempe Dr 3378 Tempe Dr Conrad k Platt
luntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 16362 Spartan Ctr
78-705--07 178--705-17 Huntington Beach, CA 92649
178-705-39
arbour-Pacific Ltd Harbour-Pacific Ltd David If Olson
atrial Porter Steen, et al Eugene Matar 3337 Tempe Dr
33g Trope Or 3382 Tempe 11r Huntington Beach, CA 92649
uatingtoii Lath, CA 92649 Huntington Reach, CA 92649 178-705-40
78-705--08 178-705-V18
arbour-Faclftt Ltd. Harbour-Pacific Ltd. 11arbour-Pacific Ltd
Lchdal 0 Smith Robert P Edwards Richard Lloyd Bundles
146 Tampa Or 3363 Tan Dr 3335 Taupe Dr
IntlaSton beach, CA 92649 �
�1�-•�p5_A� Huntin ton 'beach, C.A 92649 Huntington Bercht CA 92649
178--701-31 178-705-41
1 1 y
w
1
i
Stuart Fischer 'lQ.aeph J 0arafalo +
3402 S�ga,more Dr +� 1 Tyahnon l.n (��'^ l) Jack N Naytieri
'y1.6251 Walrus LnEuntingtdn Reach, CA 92649 I )ntington beach, CA 92649 �iuutington Beach, CA 92649
174-722-01 8-731-06 1.78-722-14
I'Dala Pet,�raon T.:a T Nguyen Willian.. J Nassit
3422 Sagamore 1)r 162 33. 'Yy hoop 1,n 16261 Walrus Ln
'Huntington Beach, CA 32649 } Hunr.ingtort 11ozich, CA 926119 Huntington Rcach, CA 92649
178-722-02 i 178-731--07 I 178--732-15
I
f
Cordon M. Jamiason Ronald B Moss I7 l -
3442 Sagamore Dr 16241 Typhoon Ln i Relbif dr 'SAlt k 6-0dot'i
5intingtoni Reach, CA 92649 Purit ing.ton Leach, CA 02649 /6:)01 Tyr h PO-) 1-QMP1 '
178-722-0:3 172-731-08 r/ {- CA
lF Mv1 I�^�
John W Hein I Oreste D Taddeo � ✓�w w .� j
3452 Sagamore Ur 16251 'typhoon Ln 7oO
Huntington Beech, CA 92649 NunCington Beac',,, CA 92649 r J ��-
178-722-04 178-731-09 j �`'`"� � ,
Morton. ? Karlan Victor Nihon Andersen
3431 Aquarius Dr ! 1.6262 Typhoon Ln
fluntingtoii Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649
178-722-22 178-732--07
Chaxtes E Cleveland Ezekiel Joseph
3421 Aquarius Dr 16242 Typhoon Ln
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649
17 8- 722-23 178- 732-08 I
i
Jeffrey M Leonard Tom T t _ye
16221 Walrus Ln 16232 ihoun Ln
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntin .gin Beach, CA 92649
178-722-24 178-73" )9
Hugh Donald Hagerty Robe, C Richter
16231 Walrus Ln 162" Typhoon Ln !
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 H!ar1. .,ngtorl Beach, CA' 92649
179 -122-25 ; 178-732-10
Harbour-Pacific Ltd Yong Lee i
Trinidad Isle Homeowner 16212 Typhoon Ln
P,O.Box 1761 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 +
Huntington Beach, CA 92647 l 178-732 -11
178-731-01,02,
Randolph H loada Michael Leight
16191 T)rp"a Ln 16202 Typhoon Ln
Huntingtett Beach, CA 92649 Muntingtou Beach, CA 92.649 178-731-02
178-131-03 178-732-►12
}, Trinidad Isle liom�ownftr
F. 0. Box 1761
John C x *rrs Alan H Stri.aak I HU11t:ington Beach, Ca.
16211 ?YOM" Ln 16241 Walrus inn t 92647
INOuriit3ustan 1nach, CA 92649 1��t7 t Beach, CA 92649
77,
Womb
QUARANTE.1',
Liability $ 100.00 Order No� OR-106786-M
Fee Yonr Ref . 300' Variance
1620). Typh,-,on Ln. , H. B.
FIRST AMEUCAM TITI, INSURANCE COMPANY
a Corporation, herein called the Company ,
GUARANTEES
Sheila Lobel
16201 Typhoon Ln
Huntington Beach, CA 92640
herein called the Assured , against actual loss not exceeding the liability
amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any
incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A.
LTABILrry EXC1:jb70N!; AND LTMITATIONS
1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the
identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with
respect to the validity, legal affect or priority of any matter
shown therein.
2 . The Company' s liability hereunder shall be limited to the mount of
actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the
assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company' s
liability exceed the liability amount rer forth above.
Dated : October 14 , 1988
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
I %, f .- 11
F. Gowi6sky
Assistant Vice President
Director of Special Services
First A"ricar, Tit I* Insurance Co.
114 E. Fifth Street
Bmta Asa. C4 92702
714/5W3211
I
r
�z
Variance
16201 Typhoon ln, ,H. 9,
SCHEDULE A
FROPERTY OWNER'S NCl'1'1'CE GUARANTEE
1. That, arcnrding to the last equalized "Assessment Roll" in the
Office of the Orange County Tax Assessor -
a. The persons 31sted as "Aseesbed Owner" are shovn on the
assessment roll as owninS real property within 300
ffer of the property identified can the assessment roll
as Assessor's Parcel Number 178--731-4
b. The Assessor's Parcel Numhar and any addresses shown on
the assessment roll are attached hereto.
2. That , according to the Company 's property records , (but without
examination of those Company records inaintFined or indexed by
name) , there have been no documents recorded subsequent to
April, 1988 purporting to transfer title to any of the
properties listed .
'sr■_
f -719-- r
' 1
«� t
TR.4f:i19pr Av L !rt(� if•� �� { /YR.f tR S-1,-r �` t
1�1 ` �1 a`a •+l`I�l�'�t�1`wl,:-`1.:1 +_i`•�+`1"f�f•■faf`t�. .L.3..L^a"L d.S • S\\\ u.
,■� _ - ' 'tat�- _J.`'1.L1_i1:= J. �� •�a . . Ia.L i-t-L3' u - ,,.
-•�ti •f�i LS SOT ! +{.IKrt2J���:� SI."iiS/ (la 1` t
TF +.•% J1.= .a r•:e s at••'++) s•�z EO �7 r ti •Z,'
Ap - 13 14
��st� �.• T 8 9) E o t 1 •�� �a ,tip.} 6 1 �� % S1:is>`\
4 . .
z.�y} r► 3 rN■. � -
li as as Y `-.fi `�u• \
l M'; y • � I
4 SAti.716 ORf s+,�ra■ a{ , - a f�� i' :� t+� .iJ r^ a`�`"`'!
yy�X ash �. a• !e
yjY j Z� a� - ■, sa' - ar- st�_.>,.. .. + J� � 1�• iti ti�f~ 1� `"� � �t %�•_1
� 03
tf �.J \.i- L 1 so
F}1 '. r +' was f !O t �i�51 r--•a~ t •-� %� _
,• \J wti e `� i �•s sY ,a;�+-�s)•` A r-4�] `'' '• y"-"' f �r'� ' �n
a•' ` 63 15-C O2aa■d 6+ a t aY �3•.at 36 { t�fi/ t y 1
6la�aj �f
�' � �r' !�' .a ]•�� ^alas
104
E {ZQJ- _ )e� % � • i y �♦ twat a, C. .01
•o =?• ■��/,-a a t ..La ae- II a:..; .era' �!t• � i �f a`�'_ / •• t � L
+a 4 ► i*it �a:i rc �� a J r d
� �`- e Mtt. • � � taa'a s. � isa - r= '.1 � ��;f �1� � r�- ..
4 `5 10, r ' Aa a� 21 �' aa�ti- 'Z n �',�+� .•/ ``vir
�l ej .e:-.7 • r� Z7 •"a EE �`� `` :li 1C
73 � c � /
a �d
`r f
71 MOTF-ASSESSO'.S atC)r-K a ASSFSSoit'S
SHOW lIUM�Erg�' *OC'Kl78 p �
SHOWN IN f.=k�+ES AGE 72 ' -
_ COUNTY cr o."cF
:At y 4i r7+J A
468
rr•■
� l R
r,yy
fU SFr\ •� / � ./le . ��^ ��
CR = L lI
t 'Al
yam^ '- -•�_ 11 �'• N w� ..,.
OX
CIA
oil
LT
ra
tlA
— Ire' , TF,
ri
0
X
al �"J\
a � Y4. y 1
M..
ti r N} : % • I •ar
4,
■ M
+ 1+/
far' •;�
a
�' � �r .• 'r�IQi
OCR M1.11A.SEC!-9.T5s,R1fi;., 70
.. Q C f r
1$013t [►rrtj Corjw
Li
T,'74CT f
.7 . �•'•'
•�� ,�?� ti� $.,�. TRACTr`;rr
'C✓:�-f=1
V.
tCr f
ti5� %f set PAGt 6
SEE
f NO. 9356 1/
% � r�`��' _aQ ; fors %Loy 4-, NO 54ev
4z -00r5��1�L�/•�� Q � •c +ram-e��i
' z
p ? to a '„ �_ • i
Of
l \
3 L Ac. •�. ! .�C �Alo
lb ta
o f
l `
rRk:T NO. 9337 Al M. 383-e4,45r46
Tf?,aCF' Na. -w69 M. m 331- f r0 4 mc.
TRACT AlGt 4356 W M 3t*9-48,45 SG
r' TRACT NO 8718 M.M. 39G-f,f7 `
' NGTE -ASSESSG;s BLOCK a ASSESSOR'S A'A F
PAIM 14UAILERS ECOX 176 PACE 70
�)� MOW!, !'r •�.CLES CCUNT7 OF ORAING ��
*► 'J
4E
70
' - _, - __ r ram` ;per�•�►� ST n� • DOW
} - 1
' _.- ^1— �i j _ •6� +,1i •!1r to- a °- u' - an ♦.� i
_ �XtE flxl ,...x� TR.4 /� r ST �a Tlaus ;
a• u ISO
f 9 -
SP } as r' s� �' r• ►,y 1 � �S JOi Q Spr� _�
• - SJ r
tv
-ram IF
_- 59
r
e-_,� - f � � � - 's. • �
4 Of
_ : �a- � t v wry ~;. , � -\``� '� ` • ` .`�•-_` 4 ti � �� [ � � ty�•
`,• � ��a, - �..•raA � � 45 r Sa'. T,: t�- •`,`•. � fags i � amps,
At OF Ab
rN t r}. ` '` �Or47
-Al 65
35 14 z �Z• t3 1 = p! 'a.� �F !�• �• •��Ci`
I
ib
�• � ..�i/ v � � 4{y� lr.FiY.er[ =:h-£f•7/ � y}i" � 26 t `: f ram'
Q 'f.�i+
Ell
• .r a • ! t (S a
•\ � �i , ` �j - .� 2 1i 3 11v f � lr. f`• , ;�C.. a+r, � ��/ ,',� fJ rr 3 j 117
19 f +_ lib -
_ S +a�� t� ( " a ° srs• Jos• •� r..e r6 �� 2� �//r
i ► y a`f�a• �•/ :%` TR.d�T Fr'O. 9.3<6 IV A, .?33- S'C. MO,�'A40
SS���S BVCDCX d r+ � i
PARCEL
SHOWAf 1N cfncLes ' aS AtAp 1
Boom 178 ''AGE -fos
y cavxrr CW oMr41f6j
.r -10
Y ...•� �.
f,
ln' �
I '
womb
r
Chi (A I I'm do"Im doh 7 ,P
� f
H ntk*m Owah,CA li"
ILF` ,
c Ltd
pX� Zopuient CO.
73
11ey, CA 9272E
178
FRST CLASS MAIL
I
1
77 ,
Publish tzi20/8a
1 i:Cz QX_ Iftlys
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIOM LACWTIOU (VARIAMCE) NO. 88-•29
NOTICE U HEREBY GIVES that tha HuntingtoA Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beech
Civic Canter, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
stotewnta of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATS/11 : Tuesday, January 3 , 1989 , 7 : 00 PM
.
1.
,U 1=1 J;j $$: Appeal of Planning Commission' s approval of
Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 88-29
AR2L&j13;: Robert and Sheila Goebel/John C.H. Chang
L0CAT2019: 16201 Typhoon Lane
ZONE: RI-CZ (Low Density Residentiel-Coastal Zone)
EAQUESZ: To allow a six (6) foot block wall to encroach five
(5) feet into they required fifteen ( 15 ) foot setback
on a single family residential lot .
EXUROMMAM IL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15305, Class 5, of the California
Environmental quality Act .
COASTAL EXAMS: The proposed blockwall is within the appealable
portion of the Coastal Zone (exempt from a
Coastal ,Deverlopment Permit pursuant to Section
; 989 . 5 . 3 of the Huntington beach Ordinance Code) .
i
on L1: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City
Clark' s office, 2000 main Street , Huntington Beach,
California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy
of the staff report will be available to interested
parties at City Hall or the Hein City Library (7111
Talbert Avenue) .
ALL lWr==TBD PER;OBIS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or subunit evidence for or against the application
Of Outlined above . If there see any further questions please cell
Thomas Rogers, Administrative Aide II, at 536-5271 .
DATED: 12/14/88 CONN i C BROC KWAY
CITY CLERK
( 1557d-1) CITY A AUNTINGTON BELCH
� w
�, rr
an
777
Cixy of Huntington �eachW . .. ,-•..... _ . ..... .. ,:,,c,�a�r �;: , r�•�. _ �
fiOX 3i�0 RNIA 42
RID. Chli�O
John Ba kakis
{ .202C2 Rung tip_,t-.Ws I !t L}
a Huntington ``.A '42646 ,
$� 151- 271-33
2646 F?1_:r1.IF;N f l-i SE::NI)h:F�
���G�N B�iH .� s�l:i 1=�l:Ir�ti�Ir,f�c):t:r�c; c�l.l'ii;::i CIr�
, l� IJ�!llli�t.l:. TO
I�'tIF�W�rt�C)
`i
era.•°
LOW Math•
0*of 1%1& lr"eal lkmmh
QW49 of do my a"
lhlrwrlYlr�IMt��� ,
r
Harbour-F r
ae
Eugene Hat
3382
Hunting+gtt 4 a C
178�-705-18 �F�p ���
i &ON' MAIL;
4, : , Il,f,,►��,l,,IlII.l,Ifl,}„�„flf,illll}III„ffl,llll
Leval Notice
Gtv of HUMkWon eel,
O fkw of Ow City cWk
P.01 Box IN
Barbour-Pacific Ltd.
Robert p Edwards ��-
3365 Tempe Dr
Huntington Beach, CA 92649 �-
178-705-11
` NfA1L
• '. ��y� ���`�• III II oil fflf„11f,�I,�,�lf f ll�
9"
.y
Legal Notice
Gty of HWAw" Bomb .. ... .... .... , v. ..
Oftim of t31w Cky CMrlt ll
kj(i
NWak*od tea,CA MU
Lode
g8rbOux a
Ph
3 o g264�1
Kuntl. '
1.78-7p5-0.,.
FIRST CLASS MAIL
P.O, ROX Igo CALIFORNIA 92648
Harbour-Pacific LTD.
Philip J. Randazzo or Occupant
3356 Tempe Drive ,
Fluntington Beach, CA 92649
i
178-705-11. �
b City of Han:ington Beach
ego%AAX 190 CALIFORNIA 92648
178-705-11
Occupant
3358 Tempt Dr.
Huntington Beach, CA 92549
•
v
of ON CRY chic
, Ity Pf Huntington BeAch
Harbour-pacific LTq.
[wart: J. Litt/or Occupant
3327 Tempe Dr.
H"ntingtort Beach, CA 92649
178-705-43
Legal M*ties
WIN
of do Cky CWk
ilk AfRigoid owe** 1ti
('f�A�
Me r
k.,
3327
H7uat i� 92649
ST CLASS MAN.
�.y ��������'v •fit;��' � ,
1 •' R
ti
f M.
y
r'
of Huntington
Pa.ca The
Michael R. Allen/DR OCCUPANT"
3345 Teupe Dr.
Rlintirbgton Berac,L,, cA 92649
178-705-38
L api Noting
0ity of Mueti"Iton s"rh
Q"kw of the City Work , . ,�'��' `}'•.t
Richar ,�• ,
3:3 T
ro �
Hun
4� � � ��• 178-•70 92649
qWeyi
SST CLASS MAIL
'.'�.y
4
waft
PA wx its CALIFORNIA 9 `A$
i
178-7-6�19
' David E. Fitton
3295 Tempe Dr.
Huntington Reach, CA 92649
Laval NaNe��
city of Mwwn004 Basch
attics of the City Cleric
P. 0. Box 190
Myra►,B.am, CA
d
3 2 <
�tunttn ,t 'A 92649
178'-106 ��
' FIRST CLASS MAIL �vi
City of Huntington Beach
AO
M.O.,10 ac 196 CALIFORNIA 9260
hart a. r.-Pacific Ltd.
Vincent T. Pagl i
3308 Tempe Ur.
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
118-706-19
a
tiV
5 T• T 1
oft**of tft CHY Cleric , .
City .of JR
untingron Be -
•0. 1g4 • CALIFOPN1A 9
178-706-02
OCCUPan t
3292 Tempe Dr.
Huntington Beach, ;,A 92647
City 0 Gw
f If n
gtOn Beach
CAtIFORIVIA,92646
-rb0L1 -Pc1Cif is Ltd.
N0121,,est M°xt j2ge znc.
Attn: pZ0
"'d- 130x 76-0
water 1OO. IA 50704
179-706-02
Oft of tft City GW*
F am ISO
*AdnOw w$,CA @No
Sharon K Sadler , � i
3292 Tempe Dr � y ti,- -/R.
Huntington Beach, CA 92647178-706-02
�+
CAI:) c 21d 3!5UC1 12r•Z31`8 i
ST CLA,9 MAL SADLER
t.:TLORN TO SEWER
MOLD L.. i T
A '
P-161 ish I ?0/8d
A�TICNy OF �LIC_ -N
APPEAL OF PLANNING COWISSXON' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO. 88•-29
NOTICE 18 HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Btreet , Huntington Beach, California , on the
data and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statemnts of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
j D=L : Tuesday, January 3 , 1989: 7 : 00 PM
AMICA11011 U.pi : Appeal of planning Commission ' s approval of
Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 88-29
j&Pi'LIC&S.T/
AUISLUNT: Robert and Sheila Goebel/John C .H . Chan,!
OWN: 16201 Typhoon Lane 1
_zQU: R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
1=21 : To allow a six ( 6) foot: block wall to encroach five
(5) fees into the required fifteen (15) foot setback
on a si.c,ale family residential lot .
ENY QWZHTAL =ATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15305 . Class 5 , of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
CalITII STATUS : The proposed blockwwll is within the appealable
portici, of the Coastal Zone (exempt f;om a
Coastal VevelopTent Permit pursuant to Section
989 . 5 . 3 of the Huntington Beaoh Ordinance Code) .
an ZILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City
Clerk' s office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,
California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy
of the staff report will be available to interested
parties at City Hall or the Mann City Library (7111
Talbert Avenue) .
AU I1yTMUSTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for ' or against the application
as outlined above. If there are any further questions please call
Thomas Rogers, Administrative Aide I1 , at 536-5271 .
DATED: 12/14/88 CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
( 1557d-1)
CITY OF HUNTINGT►JN BEACH
r -
.4 r
�4
k A►PPF.AL OF PLANNING COM ISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDIT TONAL EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NO . 88-29
NOTICR 10 HBRRSY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council ChambwAr at the Huntingten Beach
Civic Center# 2000 fain Street , HuntingLon Beach, Garli.tornia , on the
date and at the tlnw indicated below to receive and consider the
statownts of all persons who waah to be heard relative to the
application described below.
R TEIT : Tuesday, January 3 , 1989 p 7 : 00 PM
PLICA110L 11MER: Appeal of Planning Commi-ssion ' s approval of
Conditional Exception (Variance) No . 88-29
APPLICANT/
AREELLANT: kobor. t and Sheila Goebel/John C. H . Chang
Tj0 16201 Typhoon T.ane
ZO RI-CZ (Low aenuity Residential-Coastal Zone)
1399UXST: To allow a six ( 6 ) foot bock wall to en:.roach five
( 5 ) feet into the required fifteen (15) Foot setback
on a single family residential lot .
ENVIRQNaNT 5 JUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15305 , Class 5 , of the California
Environmental. Quality Act .
. AL NTA : The proposed blockwa k 1 is within the appealable
powtion of the Coastal Zone (exempt from a
Coastal aevelopipent Permit pursuant to Sectiun
989 . 5 . 3 of the ttun::ington Leach Ordinance Code) .
9, A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City
ClerWs office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,
California 92646, for inspection by the public . A copy
of the staff report will be available to interested
parties at City Hall or the fain City Librury ( 7111
Talbert Avenue) .
AU M1'ER28TBb PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
ospress opinions or submit evidance for or against the application
as outlined above, . If there are any further questions pieasee call
Thomas Rogers , Administrative Aide 11, at 536-5271 .
DATED: 12/14/88 CDNNIE MCKWAY
CITY CLERK
t 135 7d-Y) CITY OF HUNTI NGTON BEACH
• ,'��, . w h • 'row.-
A4qr
Pm�l ish 11/20/80
r alp =Ct rim
APPM 4F PLAMIE4 COMISMS'8 APP IAG OF
CONDITICEAL KXCRPTION (VAXXAICE) YAO. OB- 29
'ICE 18 XURNY GZVEU that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in thla Council. Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Nain Btreewt, Huntington Bessch, California, an the
date and at the time indicated bolos to receive and consider the
stotownts of all persona who wish to he heard reloti.vt to the
application described below.
RMZT : Tuesday, January 3 , 19890 7 ,000 PM
A12141CAT1011,,R: Appaal of Planning Commission's mpproval of
Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 88--29
BigPELLAtiT: Robert and Sheila Goebel/John C.H. Chang
kgwron: 16201 Typhoon Lane
R1-CZ (Low Density Residential--Coastal zone)
$ M&T: To allow ,a six (6) foot block wall to encroach five
(5) feet into the required fifteen ( 15) f,:ot setback
on a single family residential lot .
SM1119 ITATU61: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15305 , Class S. of the Caslifocniaa
Environmental Quality Act .
S,T�►L TATLJF: The proposed blockwall is within the appealable
portion of the Coastal Zones (exempt from a
Coastal Development Kermit pursuant to Section
989 . 5 . 3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Coyle) .
t?�: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City
Clerk' s offices, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,
California 92648, for 3napec+ion by they public . A copy
of the staff retort will be available to interested
parties at City Hell or the Main City Library (7111
Talbert Avenue) .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
+exprO48 Opinions or submit evidence for ' or against the application
an outlined above . Tf there are any further questions please call
Thomas Rogers , Administrative Aide I10 at 536-5271 .
DATED: 12/14/88 CO&IME BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
( 1557d-1) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
N 1
.r,.!rR'j• r •V r
b}'1
4,
mob
P '"")i sh 1 io,/20/68
"PZAL OW FLAMING DOMIBbxON'b AMOVAIA OF
CONMITION" EXCEPTION (VARIANCE) NC. 08-29
*MtCb It H MXY GIVEN that the Huntington beach Ci tr council will
hold a public beating in the Council ChaWwr at the Huntington Bosch
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the
dater and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
t Tuesday, January 3 , 1989, 7 : 00 PN
Appeal of Planning Commission 's approval of
Conditional Exception (Variance) No. 68-29
Robert and Sheila Goebel/John C .H . Chang
L n": 16201 Typhoon Lana
11--CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
$ T: To allow a six (6) foot block wall to encroach fire
(5) feet into the required fifteen (1.5) foot setback
on a single family residential lot,
Anvils STAIN: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15305, Class 5, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
MUTAL STM51, The proposed blockwa l l in within the appealable
portion of - the Coastal Zone (exempt from a
Coastal bevdlo9n*nt permit pursuant to Reaction
989. 5. 3 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code) .
Oil L A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City
Clork's office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach,
California 92648 , for inspection by the public, A copy
of the staff report will be available to interested
parties at City Hall or the Main City Library (7111
Talbert Avenue) .
ALL INTXRESTED PERSONS are invited to attend Paid heating and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as 4'Qtlined above. If there are any further questions please call
Thomas Rogers, Administrative Aida Ii , at 536--5271 .
DATED: 12/14/88 CONNIE BROCKWAY
CITY CLERK
( 1557d-1) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
1,M
� 1
IY
Y/
S.
„
k.
4 ,1
Lop$ M**We
Ow of Nook*"Dowh
*map of so my cbrk
P.a w. IM
Q'.
RIChnts ard E t
. Hu �
178-705-3j 649
rafjp
y
ot4
521235
WL
ST CLASS MAIL
;. FDA
,
ry5i';'(j, C # 11P .
a
' b
i• •
PM{_ Y`
Af
City of Huntington Beach
• � � �'
eaooa M c m"MT C.- _S •:GAF =
s
f {a J s
74,1n
kHunpnrqegt
02
ntpe Dr.
on Beach, CA 92647
t
I
Ai= +iE