HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional Exception 70-23 - Lindborg Company - 22 Unit Apa (7) • (Published Huntington adwh News
NOTICE OF PUQl.IL MEARtNo (Published Huntington Beach News ANAL TO CONOMONS ON April 9, 29T0�
� LEGAL NOTICE
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 70-23 1 NOTICE OF rUBLIC NEA ING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that & pub- 4 CONDITIONAL EXCEh'ttON 100. 70-23
lic hearing will be held by the City I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a
Council of fate CRY of Huntington Beach. public hearing will be hold by the City
In the Council Ciomber of the Civic Planning Commission of the City of
Center. Huntington Beach, at the hour of ! Huntington Beech for the purpose of
7:30 P.M., or is soon thereafter as pos- considering a Conditional Exception to
sit}Is, on >tAonda'► the lilth day of May, pArrni un11 apartrni=t complex on
1970. for the purpose of considering ; a arcel of land having 11,750 sq. ft. of
an appeal to conditions Imposed by the ores in lieu o: the maximum 12 units
City Planning Commission in granting permitted by ordinance. Thic conditicnal
Conditional Exception 70.23, to permit a exception will result In an Increase in
. 22 unit apartment complex on a parcel density from one unit for each 950 sq.
of land having 11,750 sq. It. of area !n fL of tot area to one unit for each 534
lieu of the maximum 12 units perrsitted sq. ft. of lot area. Said property is lo-
by ordinance. This conditional exception cated at the southeasterly corner of
will result in an Increase in density from Pecan Avmue and 16th Street in the
one unit for each 950 sq.- It. of lot are& R3 Limited Multiple Family Residence
to one unit for each 534 sq. ft. of lot ' District. A legal Oescription is on f:Ie
_ area. Said property Is located at tha in the Planning Department Offim
southeasterly corner of Pecan Avenue and Said hearing will be held at the hour
tith Strict in the R3 Limited Multiple of 7:00 P.M.. on April 21. 197% in the
Family Residence District. A legal des- Administrative Annex, 523 Wain Street,
cription Is on file in the Planning De- Huntington Beach. California.
• Rartmeret Officer. All Interested pera-mns are invited la
All interested persons are Invited to attend said hearing and express `.heir
attend said hearin, and express thair opinions for or against the proposed
opinions for or against said appeal to Conditional Exception.
CE 70-23. further information may be obtained
- Further information may be obtained from the City Planning Department.
from the Off Ice of the Caty Cleric. Telephone No. 53"WL
DATM 5/6/7(L DATED this 9th day of April, 1970.
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
By: PAUL C. !ONES By K. A. REYNOLDS
City Clerk Secretary
I
Affidavit o 'l ublication 04
State of Callfotxia , r���' \
County of Orange
City of Huntington Beach � � Ca
w• m
J. S. Farquhar, brim; duly som on oath, ways: T1►nt he is a
j citlien of the United States, over the age of twenty-one yt•nry `,�� •,.•'
That he is the printer and publhihcr of the 1funtinglon Beach d
\rw%, et tmekly new•rpalwr of general cirri lation printedanfl inch.
lishe ll in IiuntinRion Beach Califonda and circulated In the said
County of Orange and elsewhere and Imiblisholl for the dissemination
ttf hwal and other nears of a general chnmelerr, and '.ni a tvinn file
.-ubr crlptlon list nr paying suhscritx't,t, and sithl paper has Iron
a.itnhlished, printed and puhliched In the State nr Callforitia, and
County of Orange. for at least one ;ear next tueforr, the i►uhlirrttion
ltf the first Insertion of this no:it•e; and the said new•spaler is not
.tevoted to the interest (it, or published for the, entertainment of finy
pArtirular cizim, profession, trit•le, caning, mve or denanunation, or ,
any number thereof- •�'��`
The Huntington Ixench News w•a4 ndjudicate d n legal new•sim1w.r rt
of general circulation by Judge G. 9. Sc,vel In the Sur►crior Court
ti! Orange County, Califorala Aupust 27th. f-'17 by order No. A-51031 ra j
,that the NOTICE OF 1'UPLIC HEARING
APPEAL TO 1."0NrT",'IGN8 ON CONi1.EXCEPT.pro-23 MM �
of i%hirh the annexed Is a printeYl ropy, was published In said new•s•
�tsiMeMit�ll!
Raper at iea%t One Issue
t t>Mt
i
EMI►hVtie
commencing tm:n the ?t h, y
xfl
14— . and ending on the 7�h..Any cf._ y_ f
70
ita_ _ .._, tx►th days Inclurlve, and as tiften during said ix- ltr'l nntl ltlrnrs of publirntion ns said Imper wax r egulai ly hsued, and lit thnreg-wlar and entire issue of said ntrw,i�ni>rr proi�rr, a:►d not in it 19
�►. i SEsa1 Is
supplement, anti snirl notice was puldialml therrin on tl►.? follo%vina; f� '111f�1tT~/M " '• t•�trw
datcx, to-Nit: "OHL
MA y 7 1970 ;
- a
Puhlisher
Subscribed And sworn to i*efurr me !his _._..• �1: _ day „f
C Notary Pubic
Orange County. California
THOMAS D. W rLUE
MKIPXr MO1M1� NMIIC • CAt110N1t11 ,•� :�
amm
#I
QAM►iE notion .
r
•
HuatiNgtoo Beach PIaNNINg CIMMISSION
P.C. Bt1x t!O CALIFORNIA 02M
May 18, 1970
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Conditional Exception No. 70-23 - APPEAL
ATTN: Doyle Miller, City iWministrator
Paul Jones, City Clerk
Gentlemen:
Transmitted herewith is a report regarding the Planning Cora-
mission' s decision to approve Conditional Exception No. 70-23.
The Planning Commission' s decision on this stattrr was appealed
by the applicant.
&R.licant: Lindborg, ^ompany
'�" '!�" 414 Walnut Avenue
Huntington Beach, Calif.
Location: Southeasterly corner of Pecan Ave.
and 16th St .
Masten Planned: High Density.
Present Zoning: R3 Limited Multiple N3iWili
Residence District .
Re guest : To permit is 22 unit aparttent complen
on a parcel of land having 1:., 750 sq .
ft. of area in lieu of the tPAxiwm 12
units permitted by ordinance. This
conditional exception gill ?result In
an increase in density from one unit
for each 950 sq. ft . of lot area to
one unit for each 534 sq. ft . of lot
area.
Reasons jlvan ' by the Mel icant: (In Brief)
Better use of `property.
- Plannin Commi4sion; A'�ion: Approved upon the
0 OWLng conditions :
1. Cuent parking shall be provided at a ratio
of 4 parking spaces per unit. Abutting .
on-strict parking may be used to satisfy
a portion of this requirement.
2. The plan shall , be,. review" by the Board
of ' .",apt Lng Adjustwonts to establish rondi-
tloaa of approval.
3. The elevation shall osseutially eoafam
to the rotaderinS submitted by the afflic4int.
r
ROLL CALL VOTE:
AYES: Bazil, Bokor, Miller, Porter, Slates
NOES: Duke
ABSENT: Tom
THE NOTION CARRIED.
Additional information: The applicant explained the proposal.
rpetltion s gne y 3 property owners in the area opposing
the request was submitted. Three property owners addressed
the Commission and opposed the request.
Respectfully ubmitted,
K. A. Reynol s,
Secretary
KAR:dr
i
i
i
I
ru" I a, M.
CIS Of HUNT64 ON PAEKST ZONE010. Box 00 w
uv mum
IAMgrd 0, L.lodhM DV
AM4XANT Olt ANENT •
414 Walnut, H COMMISSION ACTION DATE
i
MAILING ADOWIS APPROVED
536- 615 79 vs U CONDITIONALLY APPRCIVEO
a DE NIE.0
PHONE NCO. []WITHDRAWN :{
Leonard 0, Lindborg z APPEALED M YES ❑ No
Pti'�1PERTY OWNER w COUNCIL ACTION DATE
414 i.'al6ut, 1►untington 7ch, SUSTAINED COMMISSION
MAILING ADDRESS M APPROVED WITH C%MWAR I
OTHER THAN '
TO PERMIT Z 0 DENIED
a 22 unit development Q C7 WITHORMN
EFFECTIVE DATE
...�..As-O..
LOCATION OF PROPERTY ( SIDE OF STREET, STREET NAME , DISTANCE FROM NEAREST
INTERSECTING STREET)
on 16th Street, nearest cross street is Pecan
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
;sots 22 , 24, 26, and 29, Block 415 , Huntington Beach
JUSTIF"TIOy -- J
F1L.L OUT COMPLETELY ( IF MORE SPACE IS REWRE0 ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES )
A) WHAT E*EPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES APPLY TO THIS PROPERT Y (INCLIIDMNG ! SCE , WM ,
TOPt18RAPMY, LOCATION ORSURROUNDINGS) THAT DEPRIVE THE SUBJECT Pf10PERTY OV
PftV"K5 ENJOYED ON OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND LINDCR I09NTICft
ZONE CLASSIFICATION 7
N, WtTH LMI�TAI'*W LOM CONDITOdAL OTHER"O ER�TIESQ IN THE VICMITY AND SPECIAL
10 K IM
CLASS IWCATION
i�
C) WW IS TH8 CONOITMIAL EXGEPTKINI NECESSARY FOR TIDE PRESERVATION AND
E IW ONE OR M41t! !t,NIANTIAL PROPERTY RIdHTS
D) JTATE REASONS WHY TINE ORANTIMS OF THIS CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION ML
MIATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL , TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJUWWS TIC NA MWV . w
T ME SAME ZW& C LAMO ICAT mil.
, Y
Sitter u" of property #'
� UK or
T"a Ar rACKID S1I. / MST Sd REAG "0 3I60190 WV THIK Al A
.4
A
y
A//vIM, //
.00
�,�r4Fify,,. i
j y/
/i /y
y /
, ; . fir / ,, //, y %/ �j y /
70 ��
fl
Ali, f'd A gr
/i - •j.
01
OF
05
♦ ! � / �
��� •f i/ ,� � y// ..yjf
y
STAFF REPORT
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION N0. 70-20 and
CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 70-23
Applicaut : Lindbor Coam�ppaany
Date: April 2�, 1970
The staff has reviewed Conditional Exception No. 70-20 and
Conditional Exception No. 70-23 abd offers the following in-
formation for your consideration:
1. Both parcels of land are situated in the "old town" portion
of the City and the requests are similar; therefore, the
staff has combined their commenta for both conditional
exceptions into one staff report .
2 . Conditional Exception No. 70-20 is situated on the west:
side of 15th St. , 100 ft. south of Pecan Ave. in the R3
zone. Conditional Exception No . 70-23 is situated at the
southeasterly corner of Pecan Ave . and 16th St. Tt is
also zoned R3.
3. The applicant proposes to construct a 22 unit apartment
complex on both parcels of land, each having 100 ft. of
frontage and 11 , 750 sq. ft . of area. This density is in
deviation to the maxi.m= of 12 units permitted by ordinance.
This conditional exceptionwill result in an increase in
density from one unit for each 950 sq. ft. of lot area to
one unit for each 534 sq . ft. of lot area.
4. The Planning Commission, at a prior meetiba, iustructed
the staff to prepare standards for multiple faeaily develop- i
meets in the downtown area. These standards have been pro-
ceeding at staff level and should be presen►:ed to the Can-
mission at the April 28, 1970) Study Session or at a otudy
session during the moath of May.
5. With regard to this request, the staff offers the follovings
T
a) According to the enis ri eaLing equir nts, the vny *=op-
tion being requested is the number of apextsmot ;melts.
b) In terns of the standards tentatfvtly ptiapo+red by the
staff, the follawi.ng is offered:
1) The ramp leading to the subterranean perking on
Conditional Exception No. 70-23 is situated too
close to the exterior side property line. The
staff feels that this driveway should be arranged
so as to be set back further from the adjacent
street.
?.) Parking has been designed to back directly onto
the allay. This is permitted by ordinance; however,
there has been acne discussion at staff level to
require that all parking enter the alley from an
on-site driveway.
3) No guest parking has been provided. The standards
proposed by the staff and suggested by the Commission
indicate that guest parking should be provided at a
ratio of 1/2 space per unit . Other methods of pro-
viding guest parking have been discussed by the
Commission such a9 using the existing street areas
and abandoning the right-of-way but have not been
agreed to by the City.
4) Open space requirements do not appear to most the
existing standards of 200 sq. ft. of open space por
unit nor does it tweet the proposed standards which
are allocated on a floor area basis,
5) Five ft . side yards have been provided. The question
of side yard I- by has been discussed Y the
staff and there are several alternatives to this
requirement . They aret (a) requiring a fixed side �
yard requirement; (b) Tfing the side yard raquire � ftt
to the height of the building; and (c) tying the
side yard requirownt to the asount of parcel frantags.
b) It appears that the width of several of the parking
stalls is insufficient it terns of the existing
e and r seed standards. cificall the
ordinance p � � ,,Y�
stalls ad jacout to .a mall are required to be '1l2 ft $
in width. This has not bean dolitwted an tbt plaA.
i
6. If guest parking requirements are strictly enforced,
such as required in all other areas of town, the plan
submitted by the applicant would only permit a mximn
of ly uaitc . This ri1l result in a loss of 5 units . The
staff has prepared a tentative parking layout which pro.
video all of the perking within the structure and does
not perwi.t cars to back onto the alley. The plan also
provides additional open space. This would, how*vcr,
result in the loss of an additional unit, thereby per-
mitting the applicant to conztruct 16 units .
i
7. With regard to the propoaad density, it should be noted
that the density proposed in this application is within
the limitations tentatively being considered by the
staff,
8. It should also be noted that another application in
this area of town requesting exceptions to the present
zoning requirement-8 was considered by the Planning Cosa-
mission at a prior meeting and continued to June 7, 1970,
to allow time for the Planning Commissiot: to review the
proposed development standards.
9. It is the consensus of the staff that these prarposals
are in general agresaant with the staff s proposal with the
exception of guest parking. The staff feels that, the guest
parking requirement in this area of town is an absolute
necessity and if the Ccomission concludes that the plant is
acceptable, the staff recoaoatends that the plan ba approved
subject to the applicant providing 1/2 guest parking spare
per unit and that the final, plot plan be submitted to the
Board of Zoning Adjustments for approval . Specifically
Ow applicant is four parking spaces shy on Conditional
Zxception No. 70-23 and seven parking spaces shy for
Conditional Exception No. 70-20.
Publish 5/7/70
PUBLIC WEARING SET
FO B '�. 4 Postcards 37
A9 r4ir- :�2 !� i
NOTICE OF YUBLIC HEARING 5 ��
APML TO COlI ITIONS 0.1 COW ITIOUL EXCEPTItlM 7043
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the
City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council
Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach , at the hour of
-Z1.30 , P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible, on 1bnIa7
the let h day of May 19 70, for the purpose of
considering an appeal to conditions imposed by the City Planning
Commission in granting Conditional Exception 70-23, to permit a
22 unit apartment complex on a parcel of land having 11,750 sq. ft,
of area in lieu of the maxim 12 units permitted by ordinance.
This conditional exception will result in an inermwe in density
from one unit for ekh 950 sq * ft. of lot area to one wait for &Wh
334 sq. ft. of lot area. Said property is located at the southeasterl;,
roger of Pecan ,Awome and 16th Street in the 23 Limited )MItiple FmLly
141sidi4a District. A legal description is on file in the Plamift
Department Office.
All interested persona are invited to attend said hearing and
express thef opinions for or against !laid ammarl to Ci 7'OR22.
Turtber information may be obtained from the Office of the City
Clerk.
DATRD: 3/ilZO CITY or, N'!'IMMm WACW
by: Paul C. Jaws
City Clerk
LAND D
RWAU
$Alai L N
C OMPNY
s 414 WALMIR AVM.M
�N/aACIL CALIFORNM 93W
(714)SW2519
1 , 1970
City Clerks t�ffice 7s- Orl
c lox 190 )e .c.tfit- Atx.2i G
Huntington b'cach, California
Honorable & .ayor and City Council
Attention: Paul C . ,Tones
`t''tiis is an appeal for further cony cation onthe o�pplications for
conditional exception (variance r -,0 anti LV 70-2 The original
applications ask for a variant o uila 22 one-bedroom, units with S guest
parking, no curb cuts , ana subterranean parking, instead of 12 units with
t guest parkin;; ana curb cuts .
The Planning Com.nission, on Tuesday . April 28, 1970, voted that I could
built as many units as possible anu be able to proviae the city with
rewired guest parking. unuer this approval I coulc build 17 units. However,
the prise of the lot , plus an ndo i tiona i for the subterranean
parkin , plus the rents receiveu in this area , make it economically unsoum
to Budd less than 22 units .
The remuirecrent of 30io guest parking is a good standard to aint for in the
future, but at present time is far to radical.. The area between Sixteenth
and Golden nest is still overrun with oil wells and pumps and no action has
started in their removal or cleaning up of this area. As this area is
cleaned up, other developers anu residents will come into the downtown area .
The consensus of opinion of the general public in regard to downtown
Huntington Eeach is extremely negative, in it ' s present state. It is quite
evident that the row•th will have to depend on developers as the old time
residents are eitker disinterested or have closed minds in regard to progress.
The City Council , Building uepart=nt and Planning Department state that
they are earnest and interesteo in the development of the downtown area ;
Own shouldn' t they consider the economical side of bringing people , into t w
area. I will be more than happy to build what they want in the downtown area,
but 11. would need to see in figures a profitable return for mnaney invested.
The developr,ent of the downtown area is uppe n.ost in my thoughts, along with •
the beat possible use and value of the Land .
a
LAM VVVIR.QtM M
R1WMA
DA2.lrLINDBORG
RG
d
OMPAI
� 414 WALNUT A'+'.MJF
(714)ssb-u�,
k�r ��r t;u :.�.:'t�,;� u � �?icy ►: .'.�,n C�� "t:c- v:�r ; �;ncc: :,; i��bruary I 5t:i, 1 7 7 � ,
CL: i. C1C. ..!'ilu , I , :. ��CJt ::t,:]-VL j of nc iLhbcri n� C4.Gi.0 1:
to l.%t:l-:;. _nL t►:C fc�� �ibiiit,y •�f � Dctil,-Ain t';ic: :.? unitF . :tIcy Ce! t :cason,,tI}►
sure t:i.. pLans c,•�:ulu be -ppx 7u , tl;c�-crarc , 1. wont t,) ttte c,;pense of
an�lyini for variances anc. n.:✓in6 ,Slane c rawn , so far the cost has excee.;c
;,� , hrvc also spent consiuerable time on research that I felt was ta
the City ' R tNrns fit., as well as ,nine . Tr: LonL, leach, the Fide yarn re,:uir(
:2nt is C, fLCL insteae. cf 5 any they providic no tuest parkin-r. .ill teach
cities arc crokueu in the _u.;,.ner , uuo to the poYuLation . ::plosion tr.•at , in
fly opinion, will eventually result in hA.-ri_se parkinE a3 A solutiun.
The rra ori.ty of the lots downtown are Z5 :-. 117.5 with th an alley. BetwcM7 the
bounuaries of 7th Street , Palm, Ccicaer .eet, a► u Ocean Boulevar6 there. are
appro:cic-ately 2,:i35� lots zones; for a .Ltiple dw-ellings , perhaps it Would he
better to ehangc the zoning to -1 to :sect the present restrictions for
guest parking. If the City persisc; in such racical parking reyutrements, the
growth anu progress will bcr curtailed, and the downtown will continue to be a,
bli--htee area anu eyesore. It was i hoe that ��e could worts together on
thisfor the bettery,ent, of :.11 . F g
In cenclosion, I woula appreciate an answer to ny question as to why metered
• arking angle parkin 20 minuteg
parkin , or no overnight parkin, , could
•not be the solution to the guest parkincproble;n? If necessary , remove the
parkway rraking the street wider for angte parkin-.. Also , actors would
provide the City kith additional revenue.
The type of buildiniz that I propose sct a standerd , and as the
U n:nt.own area Srcws, the U,ar!:in;_,• re !wirer.-,cnts shouLd beeotc more restrietivF.
:'cry truly yours ,
r--
;Acconar ,.j;7 Liftor
l,)L:kbs
Auaset t J. b�r� Hettn N. Cibvon
CE, YO- 23 4P 1520 Por..An Ave . 3014 iraesbyry Ild ,
.smtgn. %ch. , Cal . $264 Los Angeles, Cal . 903)
,j
Lame&M kindborb C.M. Baker 111las M. Slevin
414 Walnut 607b Roosevelt Ave . 9810 Rirch►tlale Ave.
Hnttr, Ach. , Calif . South Gate * Cf%1 . 90i!s0 Downty , Cat . 90240
Clartme L. PmeI I -r t City Adminiti► rotor Mar i 1t . 1* "art
1600 Marigold P. O. Box lyt,
Corona dot M • r . C.a l . 9762 5 I1nt Rn . Rch . , Ca t I f .
A H ach, 90440
M. K. To =art Robblo• colter el. at lose r uvn
% R.W. Stull 1999 :i► ne Burn M. , th Sr. . A pC . 3
174.,4 Coml I1 . nitudenai , fast . 0001 Ontgo . Uh. , Cal . 92646
:.Cal beach , Cal . 907'.0
Elbert F . Fdlrbmnka John V . Aemvrr Sol bH Chi.•s U11 Corp.
620 IS%% 1 301 �t . 545? Lit l tense Dr . U . :3 . Nat.usrat Kt souvcoo i
llntgn. Bch. , LA 1 . 421,•.i, Hut6n. Bch. , Cn t . 92(,41 4001 W i lshl re blind Suite,
k Davvely Hill*, Cal .90210
f Arthur 14. Weir ct al Harold 0. Fox .1e4k Sacatla6o at al
•2 ; 8 Main Sc . j2U S . Pine Ave . 2217 114mint. le Lane
Eintgn. Itch . , Call . 01etA , Wet . 41,117 cAnr ., Ana. Cal . 92701
1 ,
Coldle C . Andrews r L „ t beck C. 'Chorre U .C. Schwickreth
L.C. Entet rise-s Im . ektal 510 lbt)% '%L . 411 Marco A% e .
5435 Mi lst � r Itiv : . 11nLKit . lk.h . ,
Suite 14�
Los An=e It :. . L:r, !
llallie M. 0> .11. 1tl tt .11 itus It J . Antoinette E! dact et al
N. lh- Pape 1 `v:0 ' 191 ' Nambrook Ave .
sox eil3 '; gab& 7 u l liel ► Park, cal . 91706
Wlchenburg . Asti . Ba ?50
Lotan A. St;►sstr 8unt9I1bt0n Aoach C-i.
It2 Dolt 2.1h Div. 301', Country Club Dr.
Orland. Ca 1 , 45 t- s 22a lhlgq st . CosLs Mass, Cal . 97626
San Frei c t scu,
.loft awry Arthur 1.. ,upo Jake Mutt
tto •• •QUO $&ata ho"ica Blvd. Is$ ' 11ecar, Ave .
Los Angeles. ref . M)rtiq ► ratan. bch. , Cal . 926"
Vo1ms Mick* Rabtrt M. Attain harsh A 1As. CowrMrL
Ila hritic St . W M . Waller View 6006 2LOir7 Ilsrlt�t br
lNetiae Cal , 92610 Ihtl lortom. Cal . 92612 722 "o rket Cant
Los Ar4tles, Cal . !
cc 70-2)
• - C. Molls
.i A TmWy Lem
- . Ono Col . 97647
tar L. Mb rrr "a
4169150 St .
mt6n, fah. . :s t . 92646
Jack Saatlafa
6STCS 1"vwsterot Croup
2 217 lbnt L e St .
Santa Air. Cal . 921 u l
�Alex M. Caudiff
406 13kh St .
Flntp. Sch. . Gal . 92b46
Lhsrlos W. Ru.h�; rfuzLl
6725 1e Mnt radn
I
u%lttibir" CaA . ')Ij i
N:R . union N1Sh
1l42 11th St .
Moss. fth* , Ca 1 .
Attar Dist . :►upt .
Staff Amot . Design A
.tat* Div. of Fi ghwo) b
r.O. f" z XU4 j r*&u.N:I9w,%
LAG Awles, Cai .WO54
1.i
,1
;rp
f
'C
it �`rr• T ! r • 1 r r�n-f
t��r 1 S 1 .i.y_ � 't j .. 'I r i� r f ►Pi�
S[� �.Y�l�.Er:-.iY'i-[�K'.'Z',}•�%.t�.+f.i�i.7,r�1':►'.kyl�rzt�sU,.t�.,.,_..e 1.r � �. . ..-r. ... ._ ., '_... ' �'�... `"f��} �••j�-. "�fY� r 36t��_ ._�. ...7.� r, ..�.;�,}Rf���rC4.,�(,if.�'�7