Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Conditional Exception 70-50 - John Turner - Meadowlark Airpo (7)
«. _ .•...ram-•••.. .._ ...\,.�.... ... .:•.. ,1 _... „�..._�_. .. �_ ., - .-.-.....•�•,.Jrr.�.r...�r.•e'st+yaw 1 1 U. w � ` •• •!� yi• ' •L �. .41.,�.♦:, '.. -I`.J�4 w�t�..r• 1 :::'\�,�.17...�,.'•1�•':; I •. -64 :,•• 7 to �_ � f�-• '. � t •� �? ..r ye_ 41�*J•a mil, 1 , 1'�:� .� rIrw�s.•..na, •!t+' nei .,1•• 1 j} •.'x.�j�`4,�. y LLL ':,,..;� ♦ •.11�I,I.t �1 r.:.f••�! . /.rJ t .rw..•.J. ! �- L�-Icf,�Y'� ;.J T''�'-.•an��./w•tJr { 1• r4 !t?`►�llr- /,1 oY►•�i if' �� ,.1�11��. ....tt�: . �_�� rl ' �.•j .�.i�l < .•�y�tiY 7` 6 •�., f • �,0•Itll f' r '••I: • 77 1•' e+.�i�' 11r ` i �,�. ..�.•.�,� `` L•1_.Y,y•.,jr: p f/ Su j: J �.t::+ .�• I. � � `: t'. 1...1. �i -'• M.at11tX1.�-i'1R1, t�� / •�'1 `1' ' ♦• �i, �'=.�...�.. • �.`:.• �'+.vt••t f.i.1.•���• j1[�y.�-•1.I�•'.,,l ra 7•J l.'••.�'.ty"- J• .�. • 1:rr�• '.�iJ•�r 7a•1.F.. r ,-r!�i`✓•! '� r.1)i��_ •.1` • �1j��'.• � -, (r041. 4�1`- 1- - 1".L *1=Ir.m.. ., v.1 l��.1� i 7I • :_� •• .. M4 i.I 1 'r1'� fI.1 !� f,.'�-, '; 1 "�,�� It• •'ll �a `L +( . -_ _,h'� .� =•ler]": , I� _c .0 `x.'e_�� fix. �. !• �. `'�'' ' :7' ,' :14�•.! .1•r:tiri.�.rts+l. ++1{,q�.• •': ��h� .1: `\ ta.1 :f�� !• - . Vat i:1 �'4" •ii Gym--+ ... :;: tt 1 jitf :.:1 1 !. r•rw.� l,� - y1 I:'�''. r , 5':•.��!_�. /� yfL���{+I��t•�:11�7 !�•!{f•N�',' 1 «--�; •r•.'•iAAJ~.•v.^ lo •r.,,./.•• 'w� 1 -.1 if'. Y�i;yi •-l' :-r• 1 'i'7.'1....1!'•.l� �1 F��,.,• -r ,�'�•.� • •j~r.J...rl�r�rr...I, ,�, '__ J •' �Vr T'.:..•��(-1�.�..: a�. • , .• IM -•' :!E.�•+.i�� . ' ,ram��� ��j. _ ft• _ ...4-� �-+ p i 1,�!1 ,���• �,�.,�y,� '� � �y.�•�,t�� �'.: 1•'`ig1 � :a. :,`1 ,.,'"1�,_: 1 •( �1 rrwrr»� •� rT - S � •�jar. � '.��."..:•� ,/ ,• '•,i { '' , • `� .•''i /�.'1 '. r _....�.. TL...��.r� • j. �'•' � �� ._� r••�f ��.` ' r�..J�--=! � 1�._,..�► •r^I.l ter, :' r"�' • - • .', �, wwr! r,. t. LLI ��i•r a ti.7' 1, 1 I c .; wij -. 4 '' 'r .• '.eTir'�r '��!II`�� t���'�..1,r..'i YwtE.l. ,r .�«•' I r'�/ �A•'3r!' '*.!�'•"'• ��r.+-�_.__ I L'•1 1� �. ...\"r, '• ; •��.t�,'�'1' ` .' ';• ':,�t:+'i•�1.`.`- ��+Qbtfrn A. 4 �+,. .ir�r����/'-'+�•. f . -;'. Ci qtr- iu �'•a"��'~ t1 !'} I• •', I.r• ►i ►},i�.�,� .•Y:.. r 1 •�JI'.r�f�t•'iA + �.� i j�' •rJ ('�•�. ( r I4:y „ i' �`i�• i 'oo'gxH -1 'i �� ^t •1•Z7 z • y �•r' �� •.)1 � � � lawn•—• •' y:yyl wy,.i�L• • � �, r '.f�j� I�'K����y",' to 0 �)1 � tir ���,• .�Sp Y*tire.., _ _ —�.��y`..�1 r� ,+ - /�•' _).1,,•�+� 4i/ t` v� �•r ,.+n•I+s�i.� j�',•�,�♦?�R•.� � '�i l.•� .J.i `r���/ . CZ'• r�;� .. ::rp G.. •3:""ii• i '�,`-y�T,IE •�Y v�,���C}r•�'� �•.,.:,��.•�.,,Y'J_. -LIP-"'�- 1�".�T j�1.�� `'t•-!�'�-'�>�' ;1, . , gt• .'ij�+ '..�'_ c. �i�.'(f .>.\f 7►\ '�t�' •• � ..r .r'-J-e• �+•�'•'•w� ��-"Mj '!'A'" •• t,-. }}{{ h71' t'+` ,Y•�� ,r•�,, �_;depot j°"q_rr?11ii1 �•• -• +� + iii r L �f•_'l,i ,' dt �•Jl )r/r' y -"T� J •� ',1 �1`: �.•1_,�.. '••••tiWti'(��•��..1 ,r�,,�� 1 .�'>' !��Spt• ;� •,t "" J •�� �t. C J "�•A•'f j� •1r4•firlr��'i..4r �Y11 1 i•I.• ••V tS lr�,, �' .�•:•i ��N � \`7f ;' .i •ti dl� I I. 1�•►_(T {J `-1 rl�.�Slr,�•tJ•••.7r,� ,'r�l .i�l ` •_�.'' J , .. �• '£f¢ ` •art•.w_ ,.lo _ `'�`••�y 1Pt. '0*. Ir { •.j �r\11...`�i' •'Zi^:• MEADOWLARK AIRPORT, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES TAIL: OFF: Use short field technique and climb as rapidly as possible. CLIMB OUT: Turn 100 right after takeoff to avoid apartments. Climb at j beat angle (` ..) to safe altitude, then reduce power to cruise- climb setting at best rate of climb airspeed (Vv), I PATTERN ENTRY:Enter dovrnwind due south of the airport at 800 MSL. DOWNWIND: Reduce Power to minimum cruise setting, maintain 800 MSL. BASE LEG: Cut power and begin descent. Aim for the power station so as to avoid schools. .:VA,.L: 1-Jake turn to final at 400 to 600 MSL, Fly steer approach using m: tim+lm power. tl7r)r,ATM'%'f-, TO OMPA t714i qAA-?.42h ,1 V r-, r, ' Mll Of CAU10MA -MMN&U AND nANIMM"M AOWY wbube a UVWN A. GO"~ DEPARTMENT CIF TRANV RTATION DIVISION OF AERUNAUtICS EXECUTIVE AIRPORT SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA M22 19161 322.3M October 27, 1976 Mr. Robert Novak 17171 Bolo& Chic& Street, Apt. 223 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Dear Mr. Novak: Governor Brown has requested me to respond to your most recent letter concerning the Meadowalark Airpor!,. I have studied your letter with intercat, and it appears that you may have been given inaccurate information concerning the airport. Most of your areas of concern are addressed in the Division's aralustion of the airport which wan ccnducted at the request of Assemblyman Robert Burke. The atucbr report was transmitted to Mr. Burka on July 30, 1976. On that date members of your group were advised of the report. In addition, a copy was furnished to the City of Huntington Beach, and a meaber of nV staff presented a brief of tht report to the City Council at their meeting on 1 August A 1976. It is also vy understanding that McVor Weider made a copy f if the report available to m=bors of your group. To ensure you ere axare of the contents of the study, a copy is enclosed. The following items are not included in the study, anu ase addressed in the order they appear in your letter. i Mr. Frank Allen, Chief FAA, Lung Beach FSDO, stated that the PAA is continua13y monitoring the .!lying activities at Meadowlark. To this dste, no v172a:iona of Fnderal Aviation Regulations have been observed. Consequently, according to Mr. Allen, no enforcement action has been taken by the FAA against pilots at Meadowlark. Mr. Peter Boyce was assigned as the Division of Aeronautics Southern California Area Chief until June 30, 1976. As such, I had delegated to him the responsi- bility for the State's aviation activities in that area, supervised by ny Deputy Chief. Any correspondence prepared by Mr. Boyes reflected his pro- fescional assessment of the situation. Since I am responsible for aviation activities in the entire State, it In appropriate that ay uIgnature block appear on his correspondence pertaining to aviation matters. 1 1 �., .. Ir _ ldr. Robert Novak Page 2 October 27, 1976 I am particularly concerned with your statement concerning ov remarks to Mr. Long. My visit to Mr. Long's residence van generated by ty desire to place uyself in the position of thole making the uomp]aintst and obtain first hauid i.iVormation concerning the scope of the nciee intrusions. While at bur. Longs apartment I observed tour different aircraft fly over the building. My statement to Mr. Long vas that the pilots of the aircraft were not making the 10 degree turn after tetkooff -jhich is a violation of the airport regulations. Airport regulations (commonly known as 0:—,ort operating rules) are enforced by the airport operator, and are not within the Jurisdiction of local, State or Federal governments. California Airport Regulations, Section 353% establishes the requirement for an amended site approval permit when V%ere are -.:bangos in the une of the airport or changes in the class of the airport. Changes in land use surrounding the airport, in accordance with current taw, do not establish the requirement for an amended airport permit and anso;ieted public hearing. An of this date, I have been unabla to cone rm that a noise monitoring program has been conducted at the airport. Section 5012, California Howe Standards establisher the criterion community noise equivalent level (CNEL) for existing civillan airports as 70 DB until. December 31, 19859 and 55 CHEL thereafter. You are cautioned not to confuse a single event occurrence with the MEL, vhich is a weighted average of all the aircraft events occurring in a Ph-hour period. They method for calculating the CNEL is contained in Section $OO ;f) of the enclosed regulation. l I have attempted to respond to each comment contained in your letter to the Governor. If you desire additional informatton, please contact gar present area chief, Mr. Earl Tucker. He is well versed on Mcadovlark, and is readily available to respond to any questions concerning the State's past and present involvement with the airy►rt. Sincerely, E. J WKENM$ Chief" - - Div i n of Ae�autics cc: Mr. Frank Ades, Chief Long Beach FSDO Ms. Jerri Chenelle, Adm. Aid City of Huntington Beach Enclosure A ' C\IAI I!Ai ION OF AIEAD0+!'I.ARIf AIRPORT I iuntington Brach, California Conducted by CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF AFRONAMICS July 28, 1976 — s tttr� i'Attl.l'. ��i' ��ln ♦�1 1..`rl�1 I'a�u 1. 1131 roductlon 1 I1. CuncluMans 2 111. ItccuntrundatIons for Future Action 3 t Description urthe Airport •1 - V. C.Nloting'Situntion 5 t G i'I. 1,"ch. round of the Problem •.'11. Nal-tru- ul' Complaints 8 ".111. Sattrre nr Complaints 9 f Y. ^.utir or Complaints 10 X. .kMinns taken by Division or Aeronautler. .'1,�nrnrticcg; I - 1.0ter from .i:-sembiyman Burice :rclucating evaluation. '' - Photo or Alrport. - map or netohboritood. 1 - 1�trtlnn 710M) or Callrowfa T►tiblit Utilitiox Code. 5 - I;ertiun 21GGO or Calitom!._ Public Viliitics Code. I i. INTRODUCTION ' hIii study to evaluate the operation of hf--adwilurk Airport at 'luntington leach was undortalwn by C;o California Oivizlon of Aeronautics, at the ;vqurst of lies mnoraLlc Itobart it. Burke, Abeemblynicr., 73rd Matrict. rho Division used inforrnaLlon obtained from public comments at tim April IWO m:-etine of me Ctilifonda Aeroiwutirs Board and from our airport files. Thin iafurmition wav supplemented by visit& to the ai:pMrt and convrrsations %wi;h several interested pcople. 7 i I I r I 11. CO.'XLUSIOXS j i a. No reason ivas found for the State ae ttiC City to take action artainst the airport. b.4/ Thore ;vou1O be no point in establishing noise irnnitoring as i,iu,.; cj,pears to be no way Fire entail airplancs ush%% the airport { could be in violation of the State Noise Steuidarda. Our-noliv sludles or similar airports show that incompatible-wilso lereis i Flo nut c%tend beyoml the end Dr the nirnvay. 'I r. It is (luz tionablo %Yluther the airport ivouid nual4 fur a l,.-rsnit urid.r tuday's requirements. lioa•ovorg dr uirport doer conrarm h to the "grLaidraUwr clause" permit Issued In Septem:.cr, 10.19, ' 1 J. Thera is iw cause to rcvoke the existing, State Airport hermit undcr the proviblons or Section DOOM of the California Nblir 11111tic:. Codo (Appendix 5). The conditions under%ialch an Airpo P ru:it rwi be revoked are specifiv and do not exist. at �tca•'ual.ir::. �. Then. is iu) need for a rormt.l public hearing about conditions at tag: airf,ort. •%It pertinent facts have been ubtained and acerb}• rrf;iden::: %mv had the opporbinity to express their concerns to the California Aeronautics Board, glitch can act on appeals to artlunns t.-Urrs by the Divi»ion. • I i • i i 111. itf:c:cf;�t!tti:c;U�1C1U�5 FOR WFUR1 At:FION i a. N:o cnfotvenu:nt action is recommended against the California .%ir1wrt i cr►nit covering, ldcadowlarl: Airport, i i b. '1'liere appearn to be no re(julroment for City action rail mic is recommendcd. I c:. F,%.k has been alerted to possible violation of flying, renulatiow; and sliould bu notlMd or any specific violations obi.om-cd in the future. c!. Conthuied obscrvation of Ow situation by dw Division o* I Aeronautics, i i c. i m-ticrt; of the airport and fliiiht schools should cni'ome the • Imn .►tier talwoft" rule. IV. UC SCittl'Tluti OI' T1IC' AItti'OItT h1vmWtvlj6t Airlxurt is a small zuncral aviation airport in tic City or I lunthrolun Beach in Oranno Comity, it h; pOvately awned said open 1a public u-:u. It Itas a ainalo runway 2,WO R, long with asplialt paving. 1'lture is alsu a taxiway parallel to t1w runway. (Set) attwl—.cd snap and p hotoLraltlt for location of tiro airport wid its air trafric puttern.) The airport has a valid State of California Airpurt Permit, initially N"ut•il un `;clttcmb6r 30, 1949, v. F.XISTwc SITUATION �►. is allay lettntit I'm lr,s than todaylu derired alr1wK stasttlards, but it mects safety requirements for the kinds of aircraft ubin„ ►1st; a}snort• b. I here Is considerable deforrtd maintenance. � . riu: i-mitititted exiMence or the alrport is depewlent upon tilt: cconvinic Sits►ation or the owner raid lils desires coswenting lone of tit_- lit-aperty. d. Lit), uf' Vutstln41on Duach is no: intorestcd in acquiring tit airport. �. ;Limsall tiimsholds are; rnarilwd for Clear 20:I appimach and d.,p tWre su,•ram,; (the highest obstruction Is power llact. -.. :-ot iaiildingsl. There are no unusual safety hazamis. r;:c aitliort constitutes a ;cgal cottfursning use to local 7ortign. vvvrc no unsare or nonstandard air ttraf is patlemis obsem-ed. ��, `:!�!1►! nyin;; and touch-and-p landings are restricted. i. Ti:-r❑ line hem violations or flying regulations, The Federal .V-Intlon Administration is aware of these violaions and is actively rn('i�rrtni*rompttaatcc. I �'. 1:�itil'1:•'(; �;I11'A'1'i(t� (cnnl'd) j« i he o►►tier his talien noku aiWainent jet-on by con.h�irliti;; a wooden blast fenco on the northarly end of tiro wunway and re(Itilring a 10 degree turn to the right alter Ialceoff toward the soulli to avoid apartment Imuses. i,. About I OGG, a permaitent injunction wait Issuod against the airport, limiting it to 67 airplancs permanct..i), based tlwre. The injunction was the result of Li dispute over n private road behtp, uacd an a taoiaay.. A salt was brouglit by four r-,sidcnts against nirport 01%lier Nerlo and airport operator Tut.•ner to require Injtuictive �--� r relici' to proliMt use of the road by alreralt. The court denied Hip itijurn .ion ziaainst nse of the road at; a taxiway, but issued 11ty injimelluu limiting the number of alicrai't baacd at the airlmit to provide partial relief from taxxing aircraft. It is up to the inju:cd parties to citroree the Injunction. Nelther the City nor the S'at,_• is In a aositio►t to enforce. The issue in court did unt apply t11 rtuhic (It.... on-, airplanyv, only to the use of a private road. I i V1. IIAGI(CttOt';%D OF TIIIs I'ItOBLI At f Over the )earc;g the airport Icaa liven coy llnually crWmached upon from all s.ldci; %vitlt Incompatible use of property a(Uac ant 0 tlw airport. In roccnt %,cars, hevcral :tinglo family residence s have been built west raid north of the airlxirt, raid apartment houses and comma.vial buildings havo been built hear the south and of the nanway. hleadowlark A Arport is located under ilia Instcurncnt alipmach to ilia Long Ile/fah Airport. ThaiL Is a holding pattern associated with thla approach witch brin2a heldinn,nircraft dircetly o,-or (lie NIcadlowlarl: Alrhort. 11any of tho aircraft making apprtinnccs to luug 11cach and using the folding pattern arc licavy jets. No e!udy t:an mLdc of the t•ulumc of such traffic. I I — 7 — i VI1. NATURE OF COMPIAINTS a. Minplaints or aircraft flying unusually tow over adUacent residential property. b. Noise made by aircru.?u6:ug tic Airport, i c. Intentional low flying or buzzing over aftceit residential areas. d. liazard of airplanes crashing in a(Uacent residential anus. e. Encroachment of residential improvcutento around the existing airport. 1 - Q - VI II. SUUIICI: U1. C()1111'I.AI hTs Com;,inints have come prlmaril� from: I. him. Jam Colllns who 11 wes about two mild; from the aiij)ort mid also under the hrstri must landing approach to t1w lroup, Beach Airport. ?. John long, hlanngcr of the Cambridge Apurtmcnts near the nirpor;, and Ilobcrt Nowal., a rr_sidcnt of the Cambridge. Apnstmcnts. 3. 01her residents or Cambridge Apartments and othor f n^ighlsurs who have signed n petition complaining of trio f! noise and alleged hazards. i .l. I he u%►•ncr or the airport, who has many times rc.jucstcd assistance to contc�ol Incompatible land ase around tlic a c1mr•t. 1� 1\, CAUSE OF CO11i'I.Alws Tlw-re are several ba,,Ir causes behind the r.umplaicits which have been ITedived: ►�. (.and Ilse piarutinL and zoning Ili file vicinity or the airport have been totally Inadequate. This has allowed liniperty devolopment, resulting In land use incompatible: with the airport. h. Airhl,}ncs Wdnp, off and 1widing have no choice but to tie tour over resielcntial units which liavo been built very cloao to t1Ic airport, icr lino with the runway. Tills is undenirable t but not Ille.rd or particularly hazardous. t•. 'I h,;, histrunlcht approach to Runway 30 at Long Beach Airport. %%-Irieli passes over Meado.vlarlc Airport, could have the r.rrect of t-a►isiu;; small aircraft approaching h1eadowlark to by lmvcr than nnrn�r.l. d. The airport is pleated near the nceon and at times low overrnst r-kv rnntlitinns could cause aircraft approachin;. Meadowlark to flr unusually low in order to fly under the clouds. 10 — �. �1t:'f lU�'S 'f'AICL•:h' Uti' !)1V1!�lUti'U1� Al:li()1'Al'I'I(:S a. In ,Ini;ualy, I J15, the Dlvislulc of Aeronautics required the -Anxirt owner to stop construction of Live) houSus which would have t,ecn hniardollS to airport operation. Airport owner purchased the lots and this partly :onstructcd buildinba. b. The Divialon of Acronuutica mcommended the traffic palters „e raiscc1 frocn 500 It, to 1100 IL to alleviate noise Impact, This has brcir.�!anc. . r. Avintiolr COlisullalrt Peter Doycs flc%v to the nlrhort an Sunday, AprI1 4, 1076 and observed 05 landings and takeoffs nt file alrlxmi curd also nb:,crved the aircraft flying In the traffic pnttcru around file airport. d. During Its meeting on April 12, 076, at Costa ilfasa, the California .Aeronautics Board heard testimony concerning uperatfonss at Meadmi-lark. Severai people complafned of nalsy, 11,mar wos operations; others praised the airport's operation_ ns belm, com-, 7:rtil,lc With the acUncent nnmmunity« The rionrd took no ;;rtton% M this mecting. c. On April 12, :976, Mr. E. J. MclCeturcy, Clifcf, DIvIsion or Acronnatirs, viewed tine airport and s, rroundinp developments from the air. ,11 r I AC f IONS TAKEN BY DIVI SION 01' A1-:110NAI TICS (rnnt'ci1 f. Oil May 12, 1976, Dlvlt�ion Chief J. hlcl:cnncy vhiitctl tltc airport and sjurroundin2 tielghborlwod. Mille there lie: 1. tallied to tite owner of tits ninwrl; 2. insperted the airport; 3. Famillariml ,tirnselt'with tlttt ncighborho�td; 4. ob-im-ed air traffic; :. visited Mr. and hers. Collins; and i,. ntet walt the following oi' icialn of the City of ituntington Heath: a. Ilarriet Wicdcr, Mayor; it. John O'Connor, Deputy MiatrieL Attorney; c. Dick harlot, Pl.,umittg D!rector; tl. I.t. R. Morrison, Police Department, Acro tlttte-w; and e. Jeri Chenelle, Administrative Aid. MrKonnc;r visited the airport .Ind stirronnctine! r7a July 19, 1sJ7G, Mr. tivishborhood to observe air traffic and flight patterns. During lH.: it•ip, he visited with Jahn Leng at the Camb^id-c Apartments: and discussed iris conecrn with tits; situation. — l2 — u P1111L o//1c1 ,� fphlf.lfit[[S �J.I].N'11• f t �� �Y�I .�r.[II i f7�1 f91sy��!f3A ��•' fig War•ad H N+, 11•)77 I.w�M fiffd, cmMf c Nr.r;npbn Iatf► nM pl,y 11].tN1 R0oasty H. euP. xE 730 plariff RECLAVEC Harcr 30, 1976 APR 11276 W-`101nw W.V—" E. J. McKenney, Chic:f Division of Aerona.ut:ica C%cecutive Airport Sacramento, Ca. 95822 Dear Mr. McXenney: As you know from my previous letter to you, there has been a growt,.,.W concern over the operatic:: of Meadowlark Airport in my district. '.:here have been meetings between the owners of the airport,, p'lots, home owners and renilazInts of the area, city officials, avid :*afnbera of my staff and me. Th:are have been some changes in operatinrj procedures and some: compromises reachfd but there %re still complair.es from some of the recidento of the area. I believe the differences between the parties could /.e revolved if there were a comprehensive, factual evaluation of the airport opera- tions available upon which to make rational judgm+lnts. I am, therefore, requesting the Division of Aeronautics, as the Pgency responsible for licensing airports in California, to make such an evaluation of Meadowlark Airport. In my judgment, the study should determine: whether or not the airport is fully meeting the reglArements of Section 21666 of the Public Utilities Code, under which she fleado .•lark Airport is licensed, Also, the s Ady should evaluate the current conditions surrounXing the airport to determine itj impact on the general public an specifi.ed in Section 21668 of t�Ae rablic Utilities Code. Special emphasis iihould be given both to safety and noise, both at the airport site and the surrounding areas. Howev, r, the study should riot in any way be limited to these sub,Muts. It it my understanding that tY:e State Aeronautics Board frill hold its April meeting in Costa Mesa. I would very much appreciate having the subject of --'--he Meadowlark Airport. operation placed on the Board's agenda For that ta;+eting. Hopefully, the evaluation I hnve reyuestcd would be comp:.•:ted so that it could be reviewed by the noarl at that time and public comment accepted. i E. ►7. McRenney, Chief Division of Aeronautics -2- March 30, 1976 I wattle ait7g aiattheensottin5rofpthin subjectiforthearing.ofThankCyoua Mess Meet as ill advance: for your cooperation. 8 yo R HE r. Ultl�; mie t rw ' cc: Dick Nerio J Hon. Hurriet Wieder lion. Laurence Gehmit J David .IowlandB Jeanna Collinn Robert Nowak I I � �[• �-�w �-�R .ice� � 'V ,�-t �•.�.yirr k`� �o�►1 i.�..-t►�?:.��~ ,;tti.,,�-� •�• lw IN" �Z: Imo-• y •� �. ..�- r+ ._ � - ~^ � � -��;_�.. .•�t�-�,` ..._- - v :.�- _.� Ot vc -Not F ARW WE -,� rt•�'£" •ice!-• _•w -�.-�,,,-r• �- - ,•.,....�.�� "��`, .r'�- ��- �_ _'�S J ST. ry - _ �' .� -=`-r y-�'� _.. ,elrb+J`4�►�-��.J�J!� ls�`�i�i�'� �y._.�!�, -_��.:+r _ j `t�..�•- 1�p.+ � R--w- -'_ ems ■ '• l�,r,4 �� C:,,, j �i• »„�.= "tR�iTr'"- _ .,'-� � _� -_''ram=,;.-�-_' -- r��. - - •' - •j;�• ,!'1'' ig;t_ . i lirvonrs o/P�:m11i�Requlrinrtnls;Cand�rton$ 2!666. The departr..:nt shall issue a permlt if it is tatisfled that all of the f011DWing requirements love been mcf: (a) The site meet$or exceeds►the sninirnum airport standards spec:Iicd by the department in its rules and rcgrlations,provided,however,that the department may modify its minimum airport standards when issuin a nrit if it is satisllcd that the airport Will conform to minirsum standards of safety. 01 Safe air traffic prsttems have b^cn established for the proposed rdrport and for all a sting Sirp.por s and ap roved airport sites in its vicinity. j (c) The.oneofapprmch of f1heairport bar brut engineered Inconformit with i the rra►isions of Seition 214113,the documents relating thereto are available for i pu"Ic inspection. ^ 14 i rd) The department when issuing a permit may impose reasonable cone-Mons ! 1 ► hich it deems necessary to effectuate the rurpose:of this article. ' to no advantages to the public in sciactioss of the site outsvetgh tite disad►•antages to the environment.Environmental considerations include but are net limited to none, air pollution, and the burden upon the surrounding area caused by the airport,Including but'lot limited to,surface traffic and expense.The ! �, standards b> Whimh noise considerations are ►vct hed shall be the level of noise acceptable to a reasonable person residing in the vicinity of the airport. Tiac trgubtions adopted by the deputy-ent porsuarif to Section 21669 may be co:isidcred in detcrminErg such level of noise. Earls rermit issued byy the department shall set forth any conditicrs imposed thrreon, and any mAl'iication of the gene-al minimum ulrport standards prescribed by the department relative to such airport or airport site. The department may refuse to issue a pcsmit under this article if it determines dtcr notice and heAring held pursuant to this part that the requirements of this section have not been met. Rararativn of pf-riv lr Rnvndi 2160. The department may revoke any airport permit if it determines that ' a:sy of tlse following conditions are present: s r) There has been an abandonment of a site or an airport. tb) There hys been a failure within the time prescribed to develop the site as an airport or to tnmpl)• ►►ith tho condition of the approval as set forth in the prrrnit 1ci .he airport or site no longer conforms to the minimum airport stardsrds pr:srr bed by the depariment,or no longer complies wish the conditions imposed in the uirport permit or site approval. td► The ot%ncr or operator ofa permitted,sirpor!has failed to comply►with ony nde or regulation of the department. itl The site ma)- no longer be safely used by the general public because of, change in physical or legal conditions either an or off the airport site. i I i I . f ,.10 \ sic: may' � q� � � r. .r 1� a. .■ r-a. O ltrt of r r. w rr' (� j •� In,, 15 - �iFill I � ' .r•t.rtr Itl� I �• try . rs:• I f doll •f U 1S � �LV.v•i va•, •M:. ��. .. � r f �. doll... •...:s - 27 J Of i _ .J W DrFARTMEST OF Arn0NAV l% dpl 0419111ter 70. Me.4•-11.1;•10) 8tt MMO Tut 6, Nonlc SUNOAMDa At t;cle 1. General 9W. Preamble. The following rules and regulations are pro- n►ulgateei in accordance with Artio!t. 0, Chapter 4, Cart 1, DivIsion 9, Public' Utilities Code Mirulatinn of Airporto) to provide sul"e stand- . arda governing the operation of aircraft and aircraft ent!inrs for all airports operating; under a valid prrmit imul'd by the depaetnunt. These standoo►ds are based upon MO separate -d b Rrout.da: (1) the pourer of airport proprietors to impuse noise v gel ga and other !(tr�(ta- lions on the ttse of the airppoort, and (2) the power of the state to art to an extent not prohibited by federal law. The regulations are de"laned to cau"e the airport proprietor, aircraft operator.local govern- tnents,�piluts, and the department to work rooperatively to diminish noise. The regulations acUP►plish these ends by controlling and rte- duclaa th►' I:oise in cc'nmu'lIflea in the vicinity of airports. NuTC: Autborley elfee' &rtlun 21009. t'ubllr l't;;ltla('ode. lielennr�; t9n• Clone 210t10-210WA,Public Utititlrw(`ate. Ilnelor�: 1. New 8nbchepter 0 (11 t1o0U-14I00, 50101►d14, b030d10 6r31 - 15o;T'1, MA ilolo. ft(11tf-�t0/N, 1W.D. WtA 1f0"d101. now 41T0,w76, Ufa R oal—mioz1 filo 10-2 lo, tk►IAnsted effectlre•12.1.71 (granter 70. No. 411. 501. Liberal Oonatnclion. This subchapter shall be liberally construed and appled to promote ita underlying purlwaer which are to protect the public from ""I" and to tw.snKe incompatibllitim be, twecn airports and their surrounding ueighbom. 6002• 0o►etit:ultS9iltatlity. if any Vn5visloll of this subchapter or the applicatiou thereof its any person or circumstance is held to be unconatitutional, the remainder of tllr a►:bchap!er and the application of Pnrh provision to other perscna or eircunistancet ahall rest it►o af. fccted thereby. NO. Provislons Hot Exclusive. The pros islons of this suh- chapter are not exclusive, anti the remedies provided for in this sub• chapter shall be in addition to any ot:►er retnedle's providrrt for In soy other lav'or available under common law. It io not the Intent of these regulations to pre;mpt the Held of aircraft noise limitation in the state. The noise limits specified herein are not inte,.ded to prevent any local government to the extent riot prohibited by federal law or any airport proprietor from settipg more stringent standards. 15M. Applicability, These regulations establish a mandatory procedure which Is ap!niicr:t- to at:,, at all existing and future po- tential airports in Cali:jrnia whlch are required to on,-rrtte under a valid pern►it issued by the department. These regulations are applies- ble (to the degree not prohibited by federal 1s*) to all nperatlone of aircraft and aircraft engine" which . roduce noise. Only those air. ports which shall have been determined to have a nof_e problem (in accordance with Section 6050) will be required to perforin noise moral. tor'.ug, . I I y Busmir 8 I -ent►t.ATtnxa TI'IAJ 4 ' (Regis'•.•70. No.46-y-11.28 l0) The regulations establial►ed by thin Nubehapter are not intended to wt nuke leveln applicable in litigation nrieing out of rlainte for data• noes occneioned by nniu. Nothing herein contuin►'d in then regula• Ilous hhall be construed to prescribe it duty of car;, in favor of, or to create any evidentiary presumption for use by. any perann or entity other than the State of California, the cuuntics and airport proprietors in thy enforeetneut of tl►cte regulatlons. 6006. TinMup. Citizenn residing in the vicinity of airports are exposed to the nelme of aircraft operatione. There have bt-en nunteroua inKtances wherein individual citizens or orkanizod citizen groups hove cutnpledned shout airport noise to various aulhoritien. The severity of three cotnplohlls has ranged from a few telephone calls to organised legal nctinn. Many of these casm have been studied by aeaunties rts- warch workers under sponsorship of governmental and private orlani- zntione. These studies have grnernlly ehowtt that the severity nt the ` ro►nploint is principally asroolated with it coutbinatiou of the following Jj fnctorx: (a) Huguitudr and duration of the nulve from, airernft opera. tlona; � (b) N�ituber of aircraft operations; and (o) Time of oraurmaco during the day (daytime, evening or night). There atv marry reasons given by rea(denta for their centptaints; hnwever, those tmoet often cited ore interference with ap"eh com• ►nunication, TV,, and sleep. A number of atudica have been mnde re- lated to epeevh interference and hearing duninge, end tv,mr studies i,nve been made related to nleep disturbnnrr and other physinlugieal effects. Thew atudice provide hubitttintin) evidence :'tie the relntienNhip between noise level and its htterfereue•e with speech entntnunicutlnn and Its effect reIntive-twhenring lom. SiKnihnititly leas itifornetiun is -tvallable from the tran'tn of sleep And phyt+inlouical studiett. In order to provide it ayalemntie tnelhod for evaluating antl evetr- tuslly r^•taviur noise Ineompetibilitiea in the, viuhtitl• of airports, it it, nPeeasury to- qusntity the noise problem. For this purpose, thelie ^ regulations establish a procedure for defining n noise iu►pttet arcs sur- rounding an individual airport. The r.riterin and noise levels utilized in detlne the bound.-trien of the nnise hapact Oren hnve been batted on exiAting evidence front atudies of community noise reaction, nniu lu- terfereree with speech and nleep, and nni►te induced hearing lava. One of the fundamental philmophics underlying the procedures in these regulations is than tiny noise gnantity specified by thezte regu- Intictta be meets-arable by relutively ain►ple ► ivnna. Therefore, thm. regultitious utilize ns their busie mensure the A•wrighted nolse level, which is the mnit commonly art-epted simple mctttture. To insure etrn- Sihteury between criteria anti menqurement, the unite fur tht• criteria are also batted ot, the A-weighted Round level rather thus tine of the several more eomple: perceived nui►e levcla. These re�trlations provide a proecdurr to limit the allowable Polar for an individual aircraft flyby mrasured at PpreiBt-d points in the vHnity of the airport. The twit* limits are specified in ternvi of the class of circraft and n►eururemprit locution. I it I TITLM 4 Dri'ANTitCST a►' ;l!ta (Register 70. No.40--11•2/•701 The Ivvel of aoine atvi-plable fn it reamititfle reuidini.• its fliv vieinity of an airport 14 miablislied am if i-m m mitt' uuieee e-40voh-111 level f t':1msi value of G;► du fur limlimw•,fi of lhrm, mpuhitinuie. Thi►e t•rherimi level hna tern eht►(.eis fur re-nmimble perp-mim rekliling iu nrl►(m riAlenthil urem where houm% are of typical 1'alirerrnia wiwitruefinn and nosy have ►cimlim-w partially open. it hire been i,eleeted with rrf• • rrener to apemli, sleep and romimmity rt'arlinn. If In mrnanixed that Ilia- is N c4jnw1derah1,- Individual varinbility in the renrtbm In nniar. Further, there nre ►+everid faetimi v.•hich un- dnubtedly i+ifhtrtive thiw var)nbllily nail whicli are wit Otimuphly understood. Thett•fore, thin vrifer(ou level due4 wit have a cicKrtr of prereiaitin which 14 nffen awmit-fitted with e'nuinrerlmr rrilerin for it phya(rnl phenomenon (e.,:., the atrent:lh nr it bridge. building, et enteral. For this reason, the +state trill ievit-w the vrifirrhm perindicully. tnkhig lnln aveount assy nrw infimuetimi wbieh only hri•mne nvuilable. 151146. Deflnitions, (it) hound Pressure Level(SPL): 'rise mosins(i primieure level, in de•t.•lbelm (11.3). of it womid is 20 timem flit- luftarlihm to the base of 10 of the nitio or the pre inure of this Mnuul to 1he rrf• creme prmurp. For the purpow of theue regulittian►i. flip referetier premorc• nlitill be 20 miermi:•svtnu•t INtluarr nicter (2 X If)-' mierubmO. (b) Noise Level (NW: Ntitme lei•el. In derlhelm. is mi A•sveikhted wiurd prenmre level as weamured urine file slow t1►•ui1111ie ehnracterle►tie far hound level ntefern epeeMvil lit AR 1 RiA--10GI. Anicricim Rtatid. and Rpre)flpation for Oviiertil Purpow Sound Level I+fetera, nr !aired revitiiau thereof, The A-weitrhftuu elmravirrirtic mmlif -14 flip fre• quenry renpoitne of the menxnrhsu inntrummil to w-4,m nl nppruxi• inately fur the frerluoury elinraetcriatipm of flip 1•umnn ear. The rer- erenve jimmure im 20 miernnesvlunN hequnrr mrter (2 X In-4 mit,riebarl. , (e) NoW Erposuro Leval (NEL): The ttuiae ex{mmire level i►e 1 fir Irvel of anise nceumulated durhio it uiven rvent. w4h reference in it duratiim of one iceeund. More mu•eiRenlly. ^ %quosure level, i i deeibrlm. fm Or Icvel of the tins+•-intetrtnlpd A•. :.tell mmired tearild prewire for n atnted tune i-tforvol or event. b .vel on the reference prew,tirr of 20 tuirroiw%vtmi% per %quiire• melt-or aid reference durotieni or one sernnd. (dl H)ngte Event Noise Expoeuro Level (BEZEL): The ithig , event imiw expe.4ure level. its dwibels. is flip ttnine expunure level of if elnRlr event, much ay ua nirernft t1yby, nwaktired aver fit(- time Interval tx•Iw•een the initial null flriu{ timry fnr whirli flip noW level of a eintrle event e•xeepd+i the thrimlin)d imiNe level. For +mph-mcnlnfinu in fhl.'e aubrhnpter of theme regOntinmi. the threxhuld nnine level shall he tit least ,ill det-lbela iN•low fli,• valne of flit, mingle event anise esptiomr.' 1ere1 limitN . -sevif vil N tief-fiun 5035. (e) Hourlr Nelso Leval (HNL): The knurly mike lrt.•1, In act.i• belm, is the m•erntte (im im energy bn►iinl uni►c li'vel during it partivuh+r )tour, Ilnurly noim level IN de•"ermined by Nubir+n•liitg .3.i.11 dreibelm equal to 1U InRi►►�Ifit)n) fronts the amps• exp•wtire level niravtn•ed during the pirtivulnr hnur. integrotim.+ fur them- perimIx during which the nniye li'vel exreedn to thremhuld nniye level. i :.—atlst e► { 1 3qJ DtttssNL-s }1tnvI.Arw%s '!'x'PfX 4 (Reolate•r 70, No.49--11-711.70) For intpipmen►ntion lit thiK sub-itepter of there regulntionM, flip fhrehba)d n6w level t:hull be a no6e level which in 10 devitrelw b-inw the nunteriral volue of the appropriate rritrrion CNEL Oirh Its altrcl- flcnd In Section 501"'. At fait"( mirropltk,t,r Ineall lls. ►wtun•ra of "(liar ether than nireraft wov euutribittr to Jie CNEL. Where he airport proprietor eau tlemunoiralt• th it flip mocurur.- of the CNEL "tetteure- we)t will renjAn Othin for requirrd tnleroner in Rection 540 flip departinent may graut it woi%rr to increase the thrmhoid noise level. (f) Daily Ooauannky Nobe EquivWout Dayst (CM): Corn• ntunhy ncS»e equiri(leM le+-rl. in decibels. reprewnin the average dry tiute ttoiu, level (luring a :r-1•hour flay, adJu%trd to an muivnlcrt level to rrcnuut for Ihr lowtr tolrrattee of ptul►le to hair( durlug evenhtg nud night time pt-ricds relative to the deytitne period. Comniun;ty noire equhvttirnt level it culculnteil front the hourly nuLe ievris by Inc following: ! . ifNLU F1Ni.0 CNEL ., 10 Ing L E untiloag —!0 -+- 3� antuos 10 -I- .101 nntitog 11 LINI 10 Whem NNLD arwd,4 hourly noixt lovely for the period 0700-1000 houng IINLE nre-the hourly noise kveN for the periot! 1000-2200 hours; , ITNLN are the hourly ahme Invela for the jrriM 22f)D-0700 hour4; f wad I rocattll buinumilon, (gl Annual CM EL: The enitunl VNEL, in deelbeln, ix the aver- nitto (on an tttrrgy b;tsis) of tltr flinty f'NEL over it I2-mmilh period. The annual VNE1, it valmOnted hi acrordnnrp with the followingg Annuol ('WVL Q 10lugto�3GJ�' sntllog CNt0(I)1 WhereL CNi:L(i) - the duly C.NEL for caeh tatty in u eontinuuua 12-month peritxl,wad Z"(items autnntatiott, When the annual VNIBI, A appruximatrd by rcrnsurrmentu on a at(ttiNtienl LtRla,tit, qw-ifled in t:ec-tion 502„, the nuntbrr 365 14 repleteed by tlr nuuttwr of dn�-n for which mrasttrementa ttre oblatim-d. ()I) Maize ImIxut Dcruudm7: Noise inipnet boundary around nn uirpart vaurista (it the Iw2ux of ltuintm for whicl( the onauul (.'NDI, b( �gtt,ti to the vriferiott value. (i) Robe Impact Aria: Noise impact area, in sauarr statute toiled,6 the toad luod urez within the nolme impart bnundury IM that nrtvt devittrd to littvc At couiputible Wad une in decurdanee with Section TITLZ d DrVAHTMENT or AMONAnTICS S91-1 ` (R•altt•�70, No.46-11-N-7J) I Airp n 1'ropriator: Airport proprietor inviuln the kolder of an airpirl �lcrwit iasurd by the ilepArtmrttt pursnaut to Article 3, Chapter 4, l art 1,Division fl, Public Utilities Code. (k) Airm!di Ope.etor: Aircraft operator m-mus the Irptl or benr- flelal owuer of the airvraft w•it'a bull,orit to .ontrul tap airnrrft utilization;except where flip aircraft is leased,flip Ie wti• Is the operator. (1) Air Omisr: Air carrier Its any aircraft of .tlnic pursuant lu either m fedrr.,l or a suite eertifente(if public convenirner and ►irre"It)•. ineluding may certifleste issued purswim to 49 U.N.C. Section 1371 and ! any permit imued puratwut'to 40 U.N.C. fiecliuu 1372. 1 (m) fisneral AviLtlon: General aviOlon aircraft arc all aircraft other than ■lr carrier mircroft wid militusy aircruft. (it) D"tmeat: Department means the Department of Arro• 4 nautles of the 8tafe of Cnhf�tri lu. (o) Ooun:y: :`auuty,am used herein, shall mean the ecuuty(ward of atylprviaori or its dmignee authorized to exercise flip powers diod duties herein sMifled, S; Article 2. Airport Noine Minits 5CIO. Purpose. The purpose of three regulations is to provide ! it r, positive basis to aeco3:pllah rrnnlutlott of existing w6v problems in r commu,,i4les survoundhig rirporls and to ptYveut the development of new rolsu probleni-l. To itmotnplish this purpose, them, regulationp eatabliblh it quantitative frimiewurk within which the vioricum interosted i �I partiea (i.e., airport proprieforu, aircraft up.rntora, Input communitim. countleg and the etnfe) emu wink tugether effeeticrly to reduce and prevent i,irpurt no:ee problpulrr. 6011. Methodology for CautrolUng and Reducing Nobe Prob- lems. The methods whereby the impact of airport who shall be II controlled and reduced include but nee Hot littlllyd to flip following: (a) EneourAigitig use of the airport by aircraft VIANWs with lower . voice level characteristics mud di.wuuniging use by higher Hoine level mirm'.4 cluxsee; (b) Encouraping approach and departure f lit palhn and proce- dures to minimize the noise in residential arems; (a) Planning rummy utitita ion arhedules to take into account adjacent residential arena, now, chnraclrrinlieH of aircraft and noise sensitive time periods; (d) R ducl'(►n of f1w flight fr-,!wjivy. particularly iu the momt nuisa wimiti.- time pe-iuds and by the nni•ier Wrermff. (e) Emilluring mhlrldinu hir mdvantntm, uOitr natural terraln. buildings, et cetera;and (1) Devclupinpnt of of compatible land we withill the noise impact boundary. Preference shell be given to sedans which reih►ee the impnel or airport noise on existing conunumities. Unrl use convcrµtan involving J9G 13un1r:rSS RrOULAYIONN TITLE d (Register 70,No.40-11-21•To) exintinic residential communities shill normally be couuiderrd the leant dr.rirable action fur achieving enmplinner with them regulntiunu. 5012. Airport Belie GritoatL Llmitationn on airport uolno In redden/iu) viininumities are hereby establihhed. (a) The criterion conimupity noise equi-ralent level (CNEL) Is 65 dH for prapcwd uew airportM and fur vacated wilitary airports being converted to civilian attr. (b) Giving due cousideration to rcunomic and technologfea) feasi. bility, the critrrlou community nuise equivnlent level (CNEL) for existinct eivilittr. sirpor4i (r7cel►t as follows) is 70 till until Drecaatrr 31, 1985. and 03 d13 thereafter. (c) The criterion VNEi. for uirporta whirh nave 4-engine turbojet or turbofan Or currier aircraft opet-atiuna and at least 25,000 annual mir currier operntior:a: (takeonn pluy ",andings) IN as follows: --� Daft CNEL:n decibels ER.etive ditto of reltulatione to 12.31.76 _. 86 f 1.1-76 to 12-31.60 --------------------- ------- 75 1.1•6; to 1?-37•e:t ------------------ 70 1.1-86 dnclthereafte-r ------------------------- 65 6013. Hoke Uipa at L'ottsdary. The noise impact boundary at oirpork which huve it noise problem sot drterrtined in uccordantr with livetion .050 xi;nl) !xr established and rulidatrd by measurement in •e. rordnner, with the procedures given in Article 3 of this sultehapter. Fur prnimsi-ii new nirports, or fur antirilmted chnnRes of exiling air. ports, the uniwr impact boundaty shall be extimated by applicable ncoustirnl rnlrulatimi tet•hnhlues. The nrrn of Innd which in within the noire import Muntbtry and which hits inronipniible land use is utilised as it tnenaurr of thr magni- tude of thr imim- problem at an airport. The conce�ptts of noire impact � bourdttry tuul noke :m1met area ano ill;tatratril in Figure 1. 00.14 Qjwpatiblo-w,aaci Uses Wit &the Wit Urpct Boundary. The t-rtterion for the nni+*- impnet bo-indsry woti extubliahed for rcui. '~ i dential uyeg including t•in;tle-forally and multiple-family dwellhtge truiler park", and whDols of Ntendurd t•anxtruction. Ocrtsin other land toes may tx-rnr within the boundary but br cnmpatiblp .71th the eom. munitt- nckp equivs1vitt Ievel and hest-e be exeluded in the valculatiun of nuixt- in-prict nrrn. Por thiN purpu-,r.,, the tollotr:•iog laud uwa are � deemed compatible: (u) Agricultural; (b) Airport property; (e) lnduatrial property; (d) t ontnaenJul property; (e) Arulmrty Hnbject to an avigution euuetnent for neisr; (f) Zoned open 11pxer; W High-rise npartmentm in which ttir-lu 0v protrrtion auninat eztprior unitx• has been included in tlu dmilrn and ronntructinn, to. gethcr with it central itir• t-unditioning eyntem. Adequate virutectinu l ,.r s I ' TITLE ! DErAs'TllrNT or AmNAuTlcei 997 � (I1��I�t�r�0, Ne.4i-11•t1.70) t f FL It a A A • � Io'I"�yl r. � �. � a i y 3')8 llualr+r_S liWot.ATIO\N TITL39 4 mrann the nniw- reduction (exterior to hrteriur) hhall be nnfli:drnt to 4N a-sure• thnt interior e:urnorureity mine equivalent level in till habitable roonsts doer out eyeeed 45 dI1 during aircraft uperationr Arnustical perfurn►anev of III-. buildings -rha)l be veriAed by talculariur, or ni-asured by yiuilifiVil 11MVinln of the baildiuK ir►hpect=un aKenry of the city or county in whieh the buil:lin It tire situated; (h) In the c,s►te of existing airportm and exiufiog honrew only, residential arrnn in which existing boom have burn atvuticr►lly • treat,-d need not 6% aubjec-t to exterior nuiw- limits quite as ntriet all thune for normal residentiul construction. For thin purlxtrr, thr corn• ntunity noire equivalent level on the buundary of aueb a remidential nr-!it may be inerrowd by nn murh a►r 15 dB over flip evinnrunity nuiwe equivalent level criterion for uunacoustically treated hornets. The nmuunt of the in:•rrase allowed on the boundary is the difference be. tween the nolae level reduction of the treated hcme and the value 20 ci t:ibels tr'.tich is maumrd to be the noise level reductiou of an avrrape normal residence. The noise level rrdutctson of a honer Is defln-d as the avrrage di,7erenct between nin-raft noire levels in free apace out- aidr of the home and the currealwnding noires levels in rooms on the expostcd Sidra of the burue. In carrying out thin rseclion• the nefunl fuse to Mbieh the land Its pat, not the clatmif3caliean for widuh the hind is stoned, is determinative. Article J. Entabliahing and Validntisssr Nuiae Impact Boundttriem for Airporin Hrquiretl to Monitor !BOZO. Val ALUIta of the NOW Timpact BatttAu7. For airports with a names problem On acunreteence with Section W50). the noise impact boundary shall be validated by rnruwurensrnts►made at locatiow :!repined in Rrrtiou W21 and according to frquency regnirrmenta siveifled in liectiun UM Thew nreusureuientn nhnll be utilized to calculate the daily • -ji uunitr mine equivalent Irvela Them— daily CNEL vrtiuett will theft be nveraped (on au enemy basis) to obtain the aunw-1 i :%r.l, at eas-h of the community meaaurernent liwalions. The Inestiun of the nubk impoet boundmiry will be cwaridered valhl if the value of the annual CNEaL lies within :L-1.5 t1Ii of the criterion vnl uib. WSW Community Meaaaroment Loos Uf uL At leuot twelve (12) loeetions, approximplely egnidimlant, but not exceeding one and tine- half (l.f 1 statute miles': wparertion, telutll be wleeled slung the nol*r impact b:,vadary. The locutions aholl be tta-lected seuch That the rrraxim►uri extent of the buur dory be determined With reference ter the nirporl's flight patterns. 5M. Frequency of Nestsurumaut at Community Lonatfons. (a) For uirports with UNK) or more hmnuw within the nuiar impact bounehrry bused an a CINEI, of 70 M. t•untinuoiri monitoring in re• quired ut thtwe moisiforing poodflonn whivii full within reaidcntial arras. Weaaurrruent for at kart 48 weeks in et year :hull be considered as continuuun nronituring. , TTl"I.Y 1 DEMUtmas:xT or AERONAt►TICn 199 NO.4M-11•Ra•►C) (b) Fo? all other luratiumy will for all InrwtiunK wt other airporlm, an inirrruittent munitoring xchcdule is allowed. Va. intermittent muni• taring a,:hpdule shall be deigned so an to obtain the reeultlug annual CNE1, at computeu from mrnmurementn of each Inr:allon which will correspond to the valut which wouid be meanurerl by a munitor op- crated covilnuouxly throughout file year at th,,; location, with In an acwuracy of t1.5 dB, • Thus, it Is requirrd that the intermittent m„nitoria:q whedule be designed s.o as to obtain a realintle xtetimtical unaple of the noise at each location. As a minimarrn. this requrex that menrurenspnts be taken continuously for 24•hour perio,4 during four 7-day samples throughf.ut ticu year, chimer wurh that for ench sample, eaa•b day of flip wee•:. is reprewpted, the tour seasons of the year ire represented, end the results account for file effect of annual proportion of runway utilization. At most airports, theme intermittent ruessurements can be accomplished by a single portable monitoring inetruwcpt. OW. IuiUAJ BoUbllahmoat of the Ned"Impact Botu►datp. The method to be tined for Initial estnblish►nent of the noise Impart bound• ary of airports rr'eequired ci monitur will vary deprndinKK upon specific situations, The tallosving Kuidelhim represent one por_,iblc. method: (a) Calculate the approximnir location of the noise impact bound- ary using applicable acoumtle entitnurtion techniques. (b) Select convenient measurement locations on this ratima4ed boundaay seconding to l3ection 6021, (a) Make a suitable series of CNEL trial measurements along lines perpendicular to the estimated noise Impact boundary. For ex- ampple, two to three measurements over a one-to-seven day period along e ilia perpendicular to the estimated noise Impact boundary should provide suit lent data to detlrne, within file required accuracy, the paminal position of file noise impact boundary. Due consideration should be given to the number and !imp period of aircraft operations. mix of aireraff c1nmes, average runway utilira• tlon and other nseaaurable fnrtunr which would cause a differpnee be- tween the trial measurements of CNEL and the expected annual average. (d) Initiate vulidatiun measurements of till-noise impna.t boundary following selection of rrrmanent or intermittent mrinitnri:ag locationx to comply with the tiall0stion accuracy criterion specifled in Section SM. For permanent tneaxurement locations at which the menxured CNEb lies outside, this accuraev criterion, subsb!e auxiliary measure. mentR or analytical methuda rnuy be used to eslciapulste tine mennured CNRL to determine the -ilue on 'I-•- noise impart boundary. Sus-ln extrapolation proLvdu-:a are subject to approval I%- flit- department. 8061i. Dsvistlons from Specified Memurement Locations. Re.s- ognising the uulqur georraphle and land uxe features Rurrounding specific airpor fe, the department will vonxider mcanurentent plan►+ tailored to fit any airport for which the appm•ifled CNEIj monitoring locatlune .ire impreetital. For -xnmpl(,, munitors „lnuuld no het located on bodies of water or m }aims inhere other rnol k• miurces might in- • 4fA Itu:~u:iJln Itixll1LATION14 TI`rL? (Roalater 70, No.4e-11-A•70) -0_� tiorfere 1vltFi nlrereft CNRI., taessifrrnl pill►+, nur ere nlensitrementr re. quires Ili regions where land use will rlrarly ri•main compatible. 5MO. Alternative Matawement lEryoter. a. The acquisition of measurement systenia that tire more extenu(ve or scientifically more reflnrd than thuse e(.evitled herein Is emouruged, particularly nt air- ports with it major noW problem, where ca mpliance with the latent of Aectiun 5075(s)(4) requires niure comprelienvive riollip monitoring, _ particularly to monitor nuliv- a{alrnunl procedures. Airports ron. lemplating file acquisition of suvil niollitorilig bybtrilis may apply to the department for e:eniptluns from specific monitoriug requirements set forth !n thin subchapter of thew regulations. Article 4, bfeaaurenient of Hingle Event Noisa Exposure Levu UM. Metisuremant Hequimmants. Bl•asuremrnis of flit single event bolos exposure level (SENEl.) shall be made in the vicinity of airports with a nOw problem a6 determined In necordanur with Section 5050. These measurements are hilended to monitor flip noise of aircraft to insure .-oniplianee with the noise limits recommended by the airport proprietor and approved by flip del,urtinent In accordauce, with Article 5. W31. MeamareIIMnt Locations. Menonrements shall be madr, on the centerline of the nundual takwiff and landing flight tricks for air carrier jet aircraft and private- jet nircruft at the focationn specified ^ In Figure 2. The nominal flight trick is the lint projerfed an the ground under the nominal flight path of the aircraft. Pfrimuremrnts will not be rrqulre, for landing or takeoff Hight frocks aluovNed with aircraft operations which do not contribute to the nolse Impact area of the airport. GM. Fr&queaoy of WessurameoL At each microphone loca. tion. single event polyp exposure level nieanureinvula shall be made euntinuoualy for a uiininium of 48 weeks per year. The reinalning 4 weeka are hatesided to allow for intennittent lire oda of downtime !or r` equipment maintenance and calibration. i I mom 0 t ay Flight Lancing - — o Threshold Di.ectiaet zi d e dL t � N v o� R d Z a o S Point 150 feet inboard of i beginning of runway surface z usable for mkooff. ® Wmphom Locntioes Contedine of Norninn! a TJteoff or Landng } L — Loedin3 Hight Traek T — Takeoff dL = 25M Net to 1.0 Noutical Mile dl. a 10,OW feet to 3.5 Nautical hVies(sae Rrma 3a.) FIGURE Z OINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LIEVEL MGNITORIN3 POSITIONS o 403 11UsiN1_'24a TlMULATIONS '9ITLI 4 (Raalater 70,No.4-11.78-10) Article 5. Niugle Event Noke Lindta W35. liaxisrtxtrt lltWls Event Waist lizposurs Urrsls, The pro. prietar of rash airport which ;a required to perform noise monitoring shall recommend to the department the i ingle event noise rsposure level liutitR apprupr:ate to hie airport. In no even. khsll the Ilmits ree:,:nmended by the airport prupriitur rseeed the vulurs In Figurer 3A and 30 which correspond to the noNfrat aircraft claw utilising the airport oil a recurrent baits (which ahMl: Pican an everege of at least two airrraft operatioua wr day) during the taut-mouth perlud prior :o the determination that the airport has a nri„- problem (Section 5050). The values in Figure" 3A and 3D are baswd on ma:imtun grow weight operation without none abatement night procedure uru'.r utaudard almonpl,rrle cnntlitions at ses level. Airport proprieto►s are therefore ent- utraged to recom►uenrl lower liauita. 1!3on appruvxl of Kk h limits at it apceitle airport, thow limits will be enforced by the county in a�-cordnnre with this entire aubehnpter of there regulations. Article S. Additional bonitoring Locations 5040. Addittftd MeaLwbS Losatlors. For airports which are required to monitor, additional wouituring locations may be Lwful in some cages. These additional Iocationm may be utilized for mrsanrriumt of either alugle event noise e:pxwure levels (awb as monitoring of noise abatement!light procedures) or community noiw equivalent levOis (such s2 ut (lied points in high noi,tr level rteidential sreas`. The frequency of measurement at these additional monitoring loeatioats should be determfwd on the bsaia of each specile situation. r l J i TIM 4 Df.$%A 1't►ZNT ter AVIONAUTICH 403 (M�lt1•e M No.N-11•It•70f cW" u#so%h Clow A 4 UOA*fwM).t t.*taw is,/., ?W, 7,10,W-4 N 4 GWa 'J..64•tvM(we•(•./.,74n C 3 fptMTw4shoaniAJrb�n�t�.q.,7?�,QGIQ#wall) 0 1 Ehi+w YNMIa VG•f,7M i 1 14ro"i%aiw. [f 9 4 4 Dom DwAmj•t n 12! r ; 11t0 Its 11ef tilS 1=' 10 1? 1! Id ti 1q 1!i Off SmOumm Rw fleet rt TA"m bll, so%h . o)TAso f !! FIGUC:H 9A. MAXIMUM LIMIT) FOR RINGLIE 0VKNT H011111 BXPOAURE LKVIL f i { i i M 4M ` AuBINLM )(1:(1t11.ATIONK T Lx 4 (Register 79,hu.l6--11.2s<40) Umf Alan/►Clsr 1 feral" TwMj.�rd Tr?-der(�.1•,A7,7?O,DC-1) Y 7,2 Qh1Ar T.d.tw(e.g.,Mt n?PC-" X ! Woo 'IS'Twbtm,4's.,747) w S Woe A1A-A Twbotin•(e.g., DC-10, 1.101) V 7 L-wM&GIAMJot Y+!M 4 10VAI&41Mm Jet Wrh k?W Jule lr#?ti 0 _ I 12f 0 lb ' 1,0 0�,,hrwe*fan t,wtry ro+dreW, 1000 h b)twRra FIGURS ii• MAXIMUM t.IMM FOR 11ING .X lYIENT NOME ~ a>I POWNl< LIEVUL 1 • T1TU . Dr.PANTUENT or A911UNAUTICN 405 (Aoaleler 70, No.4e--11-26•70 Article 7. Nuiw. Itfunitoriug flystem Requirr-aenta 6W. tieael;al 8?s5lAca'I0aS. (A) The noise monitoring systrus shall provide for the followlttK out little- (1) lu the vkinity o! airport (sea Article 51. kl!wle event ttolse exposure Ii-vela e:cerding the muxintunt lirallo, to. gether with their time of occurence. (2) In community- (mv Section 5.020), Hourly noise level for cacti hour of the day, together with identHkation of the hour. • (b) The overall accuracy of the noise measurement system shall be •!- 1.5 dD. determined in sccordance with thr pro.rrdure of the ; noise measurement syslein sipecillwation given in SQcliunu 5W through 5080.6 of these regulations. 11M, DoWled Hpocifications. Noise monitoring systems uhall i -' be In Accordance with detailed epeciVeationg given in S"tions 5080 through 5080.5 of these regulations. W47. Yield Measurement Precautions. Speeitic loestiona of the � monitoring system, particularly for the community measurement loca- lions, shall be chosen, whenever poaaible,such that the community rolse uivalent level at the Imation from murces tither than aircraft In eq � flight be egt�sl to or Iem than 53 dB. This objnvtivt may W antiellyd by selecting :he location such that it is In a residential errs not im. • mediately adjacent to it noisy Industry, fr"wsy,. raiirtmd track, et cetera. The measurement microphone "hail be placed 20 fret above the ground level, or at least 10 feet ulrnve neighSuring root tops, which- ever Is higher. To the extent praeticable, the following precsutlona shall be followed; (a) Each t3ENEli monitor location shall be in an open area stir- Tot nded by relatively Sat terrain. having nn exrenive hound ahw r plion ch Arse te rildles such se might be caused by thick, toll grans, shrubbery, or wooded arena. r (b) No obstructions which Aignifl ontly influence the sound field cram the aircraft shall exist within a conical apace above tic, measure- ment position, the cone bring drfinrd by an asis atonic a line of silrht normal to the aircraft path rind by a half angle of 75 d.grees from this axis. (a) When the foregoing prernutions Are rot praeticxble, the micro• phnne% shell be placed rtt least 10 feet above neilrhboring bttiirlinp in n position which hus a clear line•of-sigbt view to this path of the air- c?aft in fliRbt. AM. Number -f 1MIemurement Systems. The frequency of memureatrnt spfelfled in Sections 5022 end 5032 i„..4 oral •lesigned to limit the number of monitoring Aystems required. The tnluimutn num• ber of mystems required lucr airport iss (a) One for interinitivnt mebAurementA of the uoise Impact bound• ary, plus Il)(i nuatNL,:a nratILATt"xa TITLE 4 (Register 70, No.ti--11.21.73) (b) Ono for continuous measurement of flit- xinaly r%-ent nnhe exposure level for each landing ur departure MUM tr"rl; Het mpfeifird [it Sm-tion 5031. This mininium munber will increaw- where necn,+uiry to conform. to Ihr requirement that sepuratlun distance betweeu ;uonitorinu pool. Lions on Ilie boundary not exceed our and one-half (1.5) statute miles or when continuous weatiuretneuts are rtnitirerl on the weitisurcuient boundary in accordance, with 13ee:tion 502`.. Arflele B. Implementation by Cuuialen j OM. dauutlaa. (a) 91ht, county wherrin an airport is situuled shall enforce this subehapter of these regulations. (b) in reemnsilion of Ihr requirement to allow the mnxitnueti "mount of local enttlr�il cad rOnrrement of this regi lailon, the county sliall determine whit:, of the airports w)thin its boundaries arc re• quired to in(tiiite aircraft noise monitoring in accordance with these relrulationtc. The county shall require nais- monitoring b� the airports i within its bountluries thHt are deemed to have a noiiie problem its de• ferminrd by the county. For airports with joint ore by both military i and civilian aircraft operations, the defennirsatior. of the rzirtenee of a noise problem aliall be based upon fhe civilian operations. In making a determinalion flint a noise problem rxists around an airport. the- county shall: i ~n (1) Inventigntr flit, possible existence of a nr,lse, impact .•, I .� area greater than zero bawd on a C AEI, of 70 till, and de- ferrnine whether or not people actually reside inteides the noisy. i impact boundary; (2) Review other infornntinn that it rntiy deem relevant, Including but not limited to complaint history and legal actions brought about by aircraft noise; and (3) Coordinate with, and Kive clue consideration fo the recomatcndations or. the county airport lend now commission as defined In Public Utilities Code Section 21670). (c) Any affected or interested person or tiny government agency t dimgreeing with the county's findings rrgareling the existence of a j noixt, problem nt it gir?-u airport may file an appeal with the depart- men,. Ppan receipt of nuelt tin appeal, flip depnrtrurnt shall make an investigation and detertnination as to the validity of flip county's findings. The department shall serve by snail the written record of such iavestiomfian and determination to the county, the airport pro- pripfnr, sail the affected or intrrexted person or governmrutal agency. If flip tlepartnteut finds that the enunty's dettr►nination does not car• respond to the fnelm, the county shall adhere to the dptermhinfinn of the department. Whenever the department has served suirh recnrd, the county. sirp,irt proprietor, affe rted or interacted person, or gar- ernment agency piny in writing Within 10 day►i demand a hearing. fn such ease. the department shall file it stntemrnt or imum and shall votiduct prixred'.agm in iter•nrtlance with the Atiministrative Procedure Act (Chapter 5. I'art 1, Divi,Jou 3, Till(- 2. Government Code). l TITis 4 Dri-AArMI!RT w, AMMAUTM-S 407 (Reatater 70, 46--11.28-70) (d) For all airpartrs required to perform nul*r monitoring, the enunties shall validate moatitnrisig data supplied by the airport pro• prietur and ishati rnfnrrr thew• reRula Buns in all respects. (e) The county xhssil ,submit quarterly report* to the Department of Arrots*utls•a. li;nrh report is slur 45 slays after the end of the quarter of the enirnslmr year rnrercrl in the report. Thu report shall aoataiu at Icast the following information on tacit airport within the etautsty covered by thew regulations: (1) A Wrap illtuttratiog the Imation of the noise Impact boundary. no va(id.ttetl by mrimurement. and Ike lo--stion of tueasuremrnt pointy, in the four pre tiling .quarten; (2) The annual n:im- impact ureso as obtained frm the prterding four calendAr yuartera, arul a* ubtt=ned in aeeord. ante with Article 2 of this svbehopler of thew regulations; (3) The daily CNPIo mrwsurrAments. Ity.ether with klenti. fteatiou of the dates on which eirh measurement t•aa nude, number of total aircraft operations during the quarter, call. ranted number of up erntion n t,f the high"t rtolwe level air- craft claw Its the quarter. anti any other data which is per- tinent to tho activity during the quarter. In addition. the •� JIINL data shall be retained for al least 3 yrmru, and matte available to the deportment upon request; and r (4) The total number of reeotslad violations of Ow da& event noisy ripoenre level ilntitw, subtatalx of such violations catf1mriaed by airs-raft class_ is list of the *same* of lire air- . craft operators in queatlon, the number of violstionn by es b, i ,1 the single event noise expowure level eorrewponding to eaeb violation. mud the diaposillon stark or tlar collected fdr each violation. (0 The counties athall eetabli,h the re puiretneulm for ideatillim. lion of ahvraft operators whow aircraft exceed the single event ooisr exposure levels in Article i of Subehnpter 6 of thewe reprulatiotlst. (g) The department will nutintain in Ale, for a period of at Irassf . 3 years. all the nolw data rtetived purAuant to these rValatiurtas. , Thew records shall be mnintained in accordance with the provbiona of the California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5, Division 1. Title I, Government Co9e). Article 9. Implementation by Aircraft nperatora MU. rlhVW9 Operf!•tors. No operator of an aircraft shall operate any airvraf t in ei!re t of the wingle event nnixe exposure level limlIA adopted in aeeord.,nee with Article 5 of this subs hupter of there replations. No violst:on exixta if the operator eatatt-t-bl..w thrt such op. eration Is the direct rrAult of the pilot'A exercivi., of hi* respanssibUity for safety of the pus enuprrs. crew. canto and tsirerift or of no emer. gency authority. Violation nt sneh limits is punia,,hable As prescribed in Public UtHitic: Code Section 216G:1.4. • /''``� dry` MIN llursit;t}n Rtx:ut..%rtoVR TITLX 4 (tit�ist�rTO, Na.�i•-11.7a•T01 Artit•le 10. Implrosrntutiun by Airlmort Propriefon 5NO, Xon;%oring ittsquiraments. (a) All airport prultrirtors shall cuol,ernte with the euttnty in flit• rounty's investigations fa defer- miue the r:in+t•uer of x noise pruhlem, sesd %hall furni%li such data as the county mev require. (b) Each airport prtpriefor whnse airlwrt is determined to have it rtcise problems shall tnrnsure, ro-tnhliah and validate twisr impart boundaries, monitor as rrquirrd in Artieles 7, 4 and 7 or this uub- chapter of these r-gulstions. Hiss! ohm)) furaiiih snt•?s claim as the t.-ounry may rrquhr. OUL Single )afros litoW Mall WoLtiew No airport pea prietor uliRll knowingly permit any oifermff operator to e:rerd the single event noise exposure level limits r%frblihhe4 In ocvo ktur with Article ,i of thin subehapicr of these rrguUtiuns. 5M. Ifoiss Impact Arts Vi*bAiam No aleport p;opr'sefor sftall operate his tsjrpart With a noko irapaet area o" attic. unIM Bald operator has a vsrunce ms prewribed it, Article 13 of thin Rubu chapter of their regulations. 5403. HubuolUd of WalkttiM Min. l:sel! airport proprietor who is regt.ired to perform anise mnnitoring ehalf submit a dpwriplivn of his tnoniturin;f plan to the enunty and to the department for ap- proval. Hsieh deucriptions ulsall twntain at Jrast -he foRowing itefornia• lion: (a) The lfenrral wunitnrirsR s}•strrtt loan, in�rltulill: at lees! {nra- tiuns and instrumrntatiuu; (b) dustiflration for any propewml devintinns from Me mearure- rlent eyntem locations sprrifiM In firma rranrlstionx. (c) Eifatitttirol aampl:nlr plan prolnow•d far intermlttrnt monifor- ing at community Icxeliuns; (d) The proprirtor'a rstinrumendni ~eagle event nolsr linsits for 11im airport;and (e) Addition-al Wnrmation its pertinent or as requeAted by the .•� depnttment. WOC Ciro uk forApprava], Failure of the airport torprlefor to comply frith the pmviaions of Rubrhaptr: A of thnrr rrgnlnfHsns colt• Ktitutex a ground for denial of approval nr au airport mite within the menning of Publie lailitiem Code,Het•linu 2166G. Arliele 11. fntpletnetttnllots by the Department OW. Implemeutatiou by the Department. The deps+rtruent trill review flip dntu submitted qustrterly by the euunties for the pur- pose of astteming the degree of compliance frith thin sutlrlsapfer of these regulations. The depnrtmrnt's review will include. but not be limited to, obsprt•tltion of any chanlres in bottutbtry nsnuitor llositiont, and any ehangen in nttmerieril 1•alurs of CNEL. TITLE S i)rrtatsr .m, or AERONAUTICS 405 (Register 70, No.46-11•id•70) Article 12. firlicdttle of itnplementa►ion 6070. t3ohednla of LnplMIXtattoto. (a) For airport« in exiNt- enre on Ili:! effective date of this strbehaptrr of thea,- r•t;;trhtllona, rnnn- ties aliall complete their do,'emination of whether nr nut it nni4e prob- lem existta avithin the Ghorteat frasible time uft.r the effrctive 4ile ut their re)nrlationa in tin event rhall Ihr time for completion of th(a de- terminstiou exceed 6 months fn+m the effective date of throe rrgnla- lions. (b) FArh propriefor of an airport that hnx it no6e problem, upon ree-ipt of nutitication front the rotnty, shall initiate name tnooiforirlK Within the shortest feasible time not to exceed 6 niontlix in aevonlance with this subchapter of these regulcllona and coneurrently p1hall make application to the departrnt for a temporary variance in acrordanre With Article 13. Article 13. Vatienr-a 5070. VariaLc:ar. (a) in tcranting variAne", the department shall be guided by the uuderlving hit-vat of t.lirse regulallous as follows: (1) That the noise impact area surroundirg propwd new airports be zero; (2) Thst the proprieror of each existing airport havinje a cur•rounding noise impart area of zero hasnl on a VNFfs of 70 dD take actious to prevent a noise impart area of greater thin zerj; (3) Mat the proprietor of each exhrting nirport hating a surrounding noise impact ar•ra of greater than uro based on a CNEL of 70 dls Ink- actions to prevent an inereme of the airport's noise impart area;and (d) That the proprietor of each existing airport hsving a surrounding noise impact ama of greater than zero based on a CNEi. of 70 dD be required to develop and Implemen► programs to reduce the noise finpael area of the airDurt to an acceptable decree in an urderly manner over a reasonable period of time. (b) An airport proprietor may request varinnerm front the regriire- ments of atiy or all of these regulations, except for fiectiona 5012 and 5W, for periods of not exceeding one year as set forth hereinafter: (1) The Airport proprietor fq1,a11 apply to the departrertit for a variance. (2) Aurh apr•rnlion for rurianre Hhall be ratde upotr it form which the :7e1jartmenl shall make atailtible. (3) Stich application shall set forth :h- s e,!%or,e why the airliort proprietor believes rald vr.rianer in necesr-dry. The ap- pllcation shall ante the future date (:y which the airport proprietor expects to achieee vemplinuce with tf,- regulatians from which n variance is sought. The nphlication Khall Act forth an incremental uchedule of noise impact area redurtioue for the intervening time, 410 BMULATWHe Ti'YIE d (RMIMMr A NM.4-11•/•7r) (4) The deparitwtt way grant a varl"ce, if the public Interest would be aattedW by such a variance. In weighing the public interest, rho dr.Artment's eoaslderatioas ineisde bat UT cot limited to the folkmwg: (A) The etonwitle and taboologiral fooWlity @C complylag with taw cols dtandards set by ties ragnhM tio"; . (B) The noise Import should the variaaes w V-sated t (C) The value to the public of tLe serriess for*WA the veriamm Is sought;and (D) Wkdber the airtwrt p7prietor is takiat loan standards set by tbow remeamrse to the bad�gouuhk lat�.lt(t�r to schiere toe~Dire (5) The bwdm of proof gall be apm glee appUe vat fie �► eariaate. (a) On its own notion, or upon the regtw■t ed are edtosted or interested person.the del ertownt abaJl hold a prink hear. - ing In conneetiae with the approval of as appiicatlim for s variance. Any iateroded person siiy abteia from ik depsrt. meat information an pending raquabi for varlances at pay ties 5. (7) ?be department in Rrenting a rarismae may impost reasonable toad float which it deem necauty to effeetuata ^ the purposes of this cubehapter of tbose regulations.' Article H. Specifical6s:Noise Mositoriag System IM PMVWA Seed lieope. (a) 1<rtrpars. Tbk speeilkatisu estallishm the minimum requirements for tastrumeatatka to be stillsed Ass�perieies required to monitor aircraft wise in accordance with rtleles 1 through lg of this sabebapter of these regulstions. (b) Soop% Two measurement eyeteme are detintd he►via. One systeaa shall be utilised to monitor the noire at speeilltally.desigaated lorafiahn adjacent to airport runways. The second eratem %ball be J utilized to monitor noise leveb at epeeitically4mignated locstimm in the community surraunding the airport. (c) Dwlga 00" The design goals for the moaitot, system are aeeurney, reliability. and ease of wairtenanee. The measuresent tab- niques set forth are sufficiently uncompilewd no that current state. of-the-art instrwnentation equipment :cosy be utilized to canflgure the two q*eme.Analysis and recording ttcbniques be wren eommunit!'and . runway monitor systems vary; however. this sp .1fiedtloa delineates a procednre whereby maximum commonality of systems elements visy be schleved. . The monitor system alwideationa are not intended to be unduly restrietive in apecifyinp (ndividual eyRleat rompoaepte. The speeitica- Hoao a11ow the util!zat:ou of equipment ranging from analog system -'^r ti 211n A 4 DttrARTatUT or AuwxAvinc4 411 ~ to automated tampater system. Tim enact eo Agm -OWN will depend upon the speeiAe ssoaftoring regalreseent said the aware ed =*Aimg uorr inslruawntatioa. This(a a total Votesas specifkatiou.It r the preraptive of tine stun to configure the oymess with emaposents wbieb will be most oompsttbis with his missing equipment and peraaawL fflfpl L AdiNiswil DeiW*n •pplfsaW k Afth 14- (a) 1f►M IasMame-a-" Men to those eleasents of a anus asaaiter- fag gsten that are exppom�ed� to the outdoor eavinaaerat in the virbiq► of the tsessarrumt microphone. This equipment mart 1wortiva withM speeffiatlon daring exproure to it ►ear groan l oa t ti vIrma djossat to any airport licensed ►the state of Cali OMIL (b) Outssiw ltasiretaesritalNa. Beim to those eksomts d the note atoaitorinE "eat wbieh will be oeataisad In Na aaevirmsmm- tallycoafrolled r+soea. (e) /111NNL JiioakoeMr systor,. The B111 M nowtaring sputa shalt monsure simple event nobs rxponre levok e:eendiaS the astssleas allowable mingle,event nolme exposure level and" ion Use time of me. currew of eaeh such event. An SNNZ4 eyslaso eamba of two = - ownssrt a poise level anbsysteve s+'.d as iairmtor/logm wbgolpr. (d) MM lfisdtaft Byslass. The HN4 snooltodog gaeae d" safta a the hourly noisa level and shall provide ideatiAestias of the hoer: This system shall br deployed :•i a cos mosity monitoring apse• teen. An HNIj systems consista of two subgVesaat a noise Wd stsbgw " teas and an Lategrator/logger sulkrsteta. (e) Noise Level Mobsystom This term defines a sobsydetst toss. posed of a =kmpbme, an A-weighted Alter, a squariug eircuit and a Ing network. This subsystem In used to derive a aipal rep easating the a%=square,A-weighted value of acoustic pressure. (f) L /ubryrlaea. This terns deimes a sobeys- text con: of a th gold comparator.as fntegeator,a clock as me. tat►ulatur, a !oWr or printer, an SOML eota tar (81E M gm tem only), ar.d a loprithmie converter. This a�apteea &all be wand to tntcvtform the output bona a noise Level subsystems.in sears et[ a pee-set threshold into BZNSL or HNL. OMAptwaoh. L 20apbe tenia6 f Pwdb defined: theP88 4 mopftp+ti� mystran, and (2) the H(NI, monitoring "ea. There are taany possible methods of configuring systma to produce SZNSI. data and IM data. Theme systems ms.• 'w anmiat.4yarm, digital systems, or eery biped analog and digital a;/atems. Frures 4 and R M-stater two eon- figurstiona which can provide SENAL and IINL meuarr-.nent& The ayatem configuratlons described bertiein art presented for iaformt oa only and not as specific design criteria. t I I 414 Hasrx>tr Ra�trr,•Tto:rs !l�T.1 d (t�l.at.e..M M..�tt•�r•�l (b) /il1111f1. S�trt,*% Oand/,a MIM An gitXZL system may be •-. oompomd of the f-T-rina elewests: (1) New 1AWA Paboymnt. (.0 Mropiim The microphone converts wow tte data to,.a equivalent electrical voltege. (p) A.WdSbft>rlllar lfatwost. This Sher mw& lief the voltage from the mks boae y►titem sa► that its • fr0fovacy charseterietku are ss/hnaaped to an ♦•w=tsd. relstltit response in aeealyduwt with weit;Ming tans is ANA 81.9.19t31, or latent rvrWm Wood. tInuuar, irWa ne gw emr�e of W valu of heddectrieal sigAM delivered froaa the♦•weiphth*nstwwin. ord, Lv (slagk•ppoML ok filter) to awootlt the m be o of the tearing eireuit for delivery to The lag network provides a d w dynsm�ihstneteristls w eve ererWat tbnund level neter in ABA 81.4.1081,or 1st•MWE (2) ilhlli&b4dSrster/1ft*ar NdrpAWM (A) TMutwsltaid This devise Stomata an output sib 1 dories; the base its input esecVde at peM. � set threshold kveL (H) IaMVab7. Thie circuit provides as output Elgcnsl vhkb b tie deilaite tlme•iateval of the input alff. sal. The input h a slowly-varying, asaootS, ualVdar sig- nal delivered from the lap network. "M int�ratar !tare three aperaO"d states: integrate or rax. bold. oe trnret. These antes would be controlled by tha tkresioVA Com, paratos Initially. brfone the Integrator input mewl ez• ervils for tbrnhold dgual, the integrator is held is rtiseL When the threshold is e:eee8ed, the integrator b act In '~ OW integrate state, causing the output to be the time-In. 4agrsl of the input. When the input nest falls below the tht+edtald, the integrator it act into the hoW state. The output d the integrator is,at hold time, the tune- integral of the tapes while it exceeded the meawresneat tletedin iA The same sigbal causing hold would be wed to resd the output of the integrator and the true time when the hold command occurred. Following these readiagr,the integra- tor would be returned to a react state. (C) Omph sad Sold (Qptdettsi). This circuit may be wed to stone the value of the integral at the time of in- tegrator bold to minhuiae the time required for tke ia- tegrator to be maintained in hold. i I tam d DsrARTumm or Aaoxatntos 413 pteeieMr Ne. -tt•10•70) (D) Ols& This device graeratrs trw titer which AT,r directed to a �r upon an lategrator•taid am. (S) Mdil .itmab darsotar This rlementie ed to eoaver ntegrated areas P-m a wwW l neererore out of from the iste�graAor (or wapk and bald) into an BSNii. havlag start HZ and stop time dedewd by the • thrsshoid citeuit and a reft-resee duration equal to am seeord. no reference duration my be intradated as a pin r an a V011(or age stT) term at st rt thethe eutput from the �►arfer caw. t to the Tartar. �k (F) SiNSL Lord Canwakr./�Thee ORM ems- C pastor oontrok Oe actual priat"W a� _the eywstim y 11 tLe signal appearing at the ostpat lagirkboils ssavertar ewewds a pre4demloed vale.titre c4sparsOw will isswe a print command. It the pm4dee■bW value Is not eneeeded,the event is ad reeordad ' - (p) ila�Mtt. This element may be a printer whit can ooneurreatlr or sequentiatr print sat vain of true tithe and SSNXU (e) I=mite Ov An HNL system my be em. posed of the following elements: (1) igaiss xwvd lkbeyoke. The HNL noise level seb- ayatem is identical to the 9SNNL noler level subsystem. 0) ML IMadrstor/Loarr 11labsydne. The HNi. In. subsystem is similar to the SSNSL nbert* in noted below. ((A) Thrrsbold Oomgamtar. Similar eseept that the threshold level Is adjustable over a Merest but pw tentiallr overlapping range. (B) Lttsgeator. Sbuilar,cseept that the Integrator is controlled in its rears, ran, and bold state a rtb&t (1) it integrates for some fixed period of time,a,C.,90 aeoowds, e2) it"holds"only long enough to transfer out the sett. put vabe for that Axed period istegration, and (a) k "reacts" only long enough to rtiturn the output to sera so that another "Integrate"period our be initiated. (C) Ana•-te and M.I.O. (OptIand). Similar. (D) chock. This device control- #L. Oming.ot the Integrator and the amumulator readout. (S) LogaMbmio Oo'Tettsr (Options-l). This ele- ment Is used to convert tho secumnIated integrated noise level to a logarithmic quantity proportional to HNL. /� (F) i11 XZL Level Owsperstor. Not required. 411 BatarNsars 112MATiONs ?><97 E 4 (140h"r M NOAO--11•01•19) (0) L�ng Sisson. Blallar. eaacept substitute HNi.for 8=lY114 (H) AeaunttbAft. This device is used to store the output of the lutrtator for all events rxemlinr the tbmO old level within a MW second period. II print roat- Aund dgnal M also prorided on tbe.bour to the lopdrr/ printer st one boar later► k 80" MUSS — III stisst. (a) O"OR Aenner. The overall sauracy of both kvatea; shall be *1A dB when neworlag noise train airtraft In Hight. It Is the intent of the ralkwing spftwka. tiara to verify this aeeurney with laboratory almulatin. (b) IN**LOW iahsyS"M (i) 1lh�tMssr>trfatase W hMMarslbow ArwrssiKbtMr. The frequen r+espoaase, sad awoeintod tolerance of the aeb. era, shall is aeeordanee with 1W PuM ation 179 es• titled "PrftWoa Sound IL"d Meters," pefte" 4, li sad a for the A-wrlgbtiug network, to be wperaerMd tkc"MI. ' tteatio" for Ike Type 1 pprtroaeision sound level •rater In the latest revision of ABA 81A1ik11,wbeo available. (5) DYMt WO ftiiw The eystew eutpat shall be pro. portionah to Cite antilop of the coke k►d ow a soiss 10"I range of 60 dB to 120 dD, 1 torer(ed) For In s0 dB or�grea$ter Inerrraients the the use of • atteauatom Tie Doha level For each attravator rsv►ge shall be at kart 40 d8 below tall seek. Full style nags 4WI apply to dgaala with a erw factor sa gtret os l:1. (B) For the HNL sabsysim. the internal elMrkal noise shell not exeted an equivalent !spat aohse level of Ib 49.and the full mate romp of 120 dD deli apply to sigtsds with a east fsefor a%posit ss 84. (S) ZhiONVOy. The eleetrieal amplitude rrapo m to slat wsvea in the frequeney► rasp of SU his to 11.100 Hs W1 be Usear within oar decibel from 30 dB below each fall scale mop op to 7 dD aboro the lull scale sage on say given j. mace d the lastrmnaL M '/Le[ti'er Naboysi n. ! (1) Thnabdd Omparalae, For BEN1;L.the threshold level shall ire selectable in steps of no greater than 10 dB over a wAw level cause of at least 60 to fl0 dB. For HIN4. the *ftshold level shtJl be adjustable over a noise level roue of at Inst 55 to 70 db. In both ewes, thr+esbold triggering sba11 ' be repeatable within t0.5 dD. (L) L Ooutparator. The maximum allowable SW IL shall be selectable over an SHNEL range of 85 to •�.. i •. n TrrLz 4 DarAa'tNUT or ASMONAUTICS 415 125 dD. Comparator sensing shall be reputable within t0.5 dH. (3) Chmk The clock shall be capable of being aft to the time of dam within am Mur(K7 of 10 seconds and shall not drift more than 20 seconds fa a h&11 ur perbd. For SBNNL, the cloak output which Wen:ti l s the start or pep • time of the single event dlwll be readable within nee asas�d. (t) MID&W111114 AUUFW. The ead•to•ead aeeunmy of the integrator/logger subsystem is defined In tersas of a W. Polar, positive•gving square nave Input. The iomIA faw grated output of the system should tail within S:1 aB-at the ` true value predicted for the wave, of it given duration at ra sanplitnde eseceding the measurement tbrmbold by at leant 10 dB, and at all higher amplitudes within the rasp, no square wave shall hs applied at the input to the lotogrator and lore!eo■oparator. (A) /finis U%pv$w/Lsggw OWW7olfaa. For . square waves drdmd at all iregseaeiss between 0.026 and 1.0 Us. the subWstem shall output the S1rM es- oeeding the ma:imu»n allowable SNNNL and Its tim of exurrswe to demonstrate end•to•eud aeearaoy. (H) En I:touts AARfr asMystrat. 1. For eae bear durift which ores noise event ' .. esanede the HD1L aM m twice level threshold, the subsystem shall output the time on the hour, and Indicate that the astlleg of the NNL for the pre• ftdlhour is:sero. . The end-to-end accuracy AW1 be determined over the r.wile of M from 45 dB to 85 dB for each embleu,tioa of the following eooditim vbkb gives a value in this rates: a. Square wares,as defined above,sbau have durations of 1,3, 10,30 and 100 cycles. b. Square wares shall be at trequeneles of 0,025,0.06,0.10 and 0.20 Ha. e, Square waves shall have smputades which are equivalent to noise levels of 70,80, 00, 100 rind 110 dB. (d) DverA /yst4 a Aosurpsy Dsmostetr*lott, The overall sys. tent accuracy ahau be demos strated for several conditions within each of the following ranges, utilizing a 1000 Ns slnosoldpt acoustic View ware.oriented abag the preferred plane wave aria of the microphone, or are equivalent signal generated in an acoustic coupler: ' (1) w1 j.Notdtoring ryatam. (A) The SBNSL emparstor shall be set at several r values of interest, inaluding at lent 05, 106, 115 and, 125 dB. it SIM i f 416 BustNttas Rao111,41rtaxa T1TLZ 4 (Reat•!•r M Ns.40-11•21•79) (8) The durallona of the rinmoldal aroustir slplsle shall Iodate at hart 5, 10.20 and 44)secalds. (C 1 The noise levels for the acoustie luputs at each of the above durations shall be set at levels calculated to producr BRNPIa's of —1.5. +1.5 and +10 dB relative to the f1RNR1j comparator selling. (2) NIM hag iyMM . (A) The noise levels for the seowtie top uts shall include at least values of 90,901 90 mad 1�00 d8. (B) The durstionsof the alnusaidal scouNical sigash shall include at least 5,10, 20 and 40 semads. (0) Imb of the events deAoed by the above eons• biaations shall be repeated 1.8, 10, 90 maid IW tiros per one hour tat to obtain the UNL malting from such repetition. The HNL aeeursey for each combination Is defined as the difference between the cale►tlated and nn& ured value for eseh test. Testa are not uhA for those comblustions which produce a calculateddHNL Wits out. side the range of 43 dN to 95 dB. 11M.4. >llald OollbrA w. The monitoring system shelf include an internal electrical mesm to electrically check and maintain ealibra. tion without resort to additional equipment. Provision shall Wait be made to enable calibration with an external scoustle coupler. 5090.5. xxvkGREMW PrM atleas aid 1R�sgttlratiaealts. (a) The geld instrumentation ahall be provided with suitable protection stub that the system perfortnines specified will not be degraded while the system is operating within the range of weather oonditlens encountered, at airports within the State of California. (b) >Xwtaldlty. The effect of changes in relative humidity on sensitivity of geld instrumentation shall be less thaw 0.5 decibel at any frequeney between 214 and 11,200 Its In th! range of 5 to 1W percent relative humidity. (a) Vlbrtailox The field Instrumentation shall be drel tied and constructed so as to winiraise the effe0s of vibratiou resulting frwa mechanical excitation. Shock mounting of the geld instrumentation shall be provided sa required to preclude degradation of system per. lorasanoe. (d) •ovine xolss. The field instrumentation shall be designed and constructed so ju to minimise effects of vibration resulting from airborne noise, and shall operate it► an environment of 125 dB BPI.-- broadband noise over a frequency range of 22.4 to 11,2W Hs—without degradation of system performance. J • TIM d DZPARTalFX-t or AMONLnT10/ 417 (e) X- a tarn ems• The elfftta of tnspetle and slertrostatle fields shall be redneed to to minleansa. The aaapaitude of uroh Bella whieh would 4ep%dr the performaaee of the "eaa is aewrdamw with the apevitieatioua is Rectieaa 50W.3 shall be deg named and atated. (f) WbOISWOM A windaereen suitable for we with tba mi- crophone aAall be used at all timm. the windwreea "I be drslpi so that for wkndapet& of 80 mike ppwer lour or less. the overall rooatraey of the mmureaaeat wets n "heed In 8ectlen bOW.11(s) is aot eataa- I j t ti s A r i S'iiii �Kd,twtno�t�( wsntsng 6t1 22M ! DSPAWm=t or AMMAUtlC/ !lf i i ; 1• I 1 ' I r Ir I . i + I � I l� i .-ti THE HEAD'C LkRK LAIABILITY How does the pilots t,�nelit H.Il.I Does their r+.A-fo join them and do they dine out in our fair city as do the active Pilot Aesooa. The Asaoolation benefits the city by their visit. What can our pilots dpol Fa they visit other adrportsT Not Do they have an active purpose for their flights that beneffts the city and thomelvesl or do they fly around, fly around, get boredo flying love being nosey and beomaiug- ar.large nuisaanctel We Jobj La% (its hospital) who represents 400 peoplie at the Cambridge and wontioello optse has outlined in his letter a, continuous problem, lack of action, broken promises, and Lt. Norribm trying mad giving up. He does state Mve N. J. XaZenney, Chief of Division of Aaronautics while visiting the Qamtridge apta., noted 5 flights and stated 3 were is vicletion. "x. E. J. mcAenneT did stab see fit to Ito the Job he is paid to do and do something about the violators:. NOTE: : s Random sole otiono -SNIalators our to 5 flights. dometime ago we noted the planes were flying extremely low over the south and of the cambridge apts.. Mr. Long called Art Norio and asked why. Kr. Nerior said,"There is a, 60 foot boost in front of the new 3 sto:•y executive bldge and we cannot clear the bocan"... I think this tell us something. We asked Alicia- Wentworth on Ajugust 7, 1976, item 6- Pllo* Liability* are all pilots using Meadowlark airport fully covered by proper insurarcol- "its to the hide risk factor in the ORAf9N HAZARD ZWO Is there ways to proteort City, Residents, Pilots, and Businessman The Alraraft Expert hired to study the aircraft and airport wbetr C. as 70-50 was being drawan up diiioovered certain !acts. Let as put this may ots the wall it possible. Note it is 1700 feet plus to the boom or that derrick as takeir from H. Be maps. Table two- titled "Altitude At End Cf Runway" as done by aircraft expert gives: this data:. the data- Is good for orckl days, ato hot days g and nar load except pilot. The $emarm 150 will be 70 feet above the ground at the boost or 1700 feet• Cessna 172 will o be orasb3nd into boom at a pout 6 feet below top of boom. Apaahe, ame engine, Will take dcwn the 11ght phles Md hit boost at 8 foot mark above sr ound./ X w superior O'ourt Me a rso ord ♦1w aopy of u,. Is W-50 that city of H.. Be has 6-7 year history at' auloeanee Mesa@ listen osr*fully nrsr• ... d plane takes oft form Moa.dowlark airport and arashes Into the mm 3 story eseautive bid6, (a• arash is behind scbedultr 3%cw) his tenants move pub on& mew tenmat• won 't awe in ant owner sues the City of H. Be for 15 million dollars. He will win automatically tecause of C. Z. 70-50 record' in superior court and Court Crdersl U. Be 50485.2 and Asidersen vs souwr (1952), 243 P.2d 497, /d 0.2d 82% Tbome states If a, alty knowlt*ly letr w- nulsoanoe exist., they are 11ble. 1bu It it nice to provide that land owner a nice- 15 ral inaaw or I. 15 million dollars. Just bonus* the City of H. H. failed to do the job required of then?M I I I I' f i I I i� I 1 I f� • r • Gcto wr 30, A-VIG Gwabridge .%pt l e. , .L(I'1.L �olcaa Cnioa :antimgtan coach, Ca„ j2WP-/. I:nyor .za riett Wisdor, Lombers of tne City Oatuwxl: ae ti1mbor L,!'(5 , a protest was lodged with A. rleri.o, ooncornxrsg, loft ovorrlitans Rxtremo sraire, Buzingi, 'Pouch me av rly1mas 1ML- of .mlos govorning t'I1ght i attem s- Take off Ix and mui4-tnga, kight F'lignts, early WmIng F3lguta, Stunting ovor oanjosted Aresw. Tjw rilots upon learning of tao protest, tooic it upon tttom- oolvos to naroms by oxtromo low dying, isrzzing, ,.uap thumbings Finally after mucn rootura.c, continuod protont to the C3ity, ri, .iv :.:C raooting via,s asp.aged and hold on ;,irport rropertly I-Isre ,ant,, 11,�tbe -%vault s .�ost :tubs and notify all pilots, A=tructorz and stuciont I:ilots ro;;ard=Z- Turns at tal o off- i'lsp.nt patti©rno, ,:,j t:oucti cmd go rly.Lng and avoid u..►. I•'i.V.1tG ovor the Cambrxdro AI)Da. Lto I:orrifson, hunt izigton I3oaon aclicoptcuo -.:rout,, to pat.- i.oi Leal aii-port atYd adviao the piluts oV ru,.os turd '.ntructiorw 2.,iuoo rulas wore Wood to by all concarnod paitio3 and to bo put into ai`;act for a tnroo monthporiod„ '1'lioroi�y r3.vl.isg ..4io t 4ous ands of pora ona, inaludinG caildarn in :ahools,a rap.. move rron L'no throat of potontial crashea, Knish would in juro main ar 11.111 a:V n=ber$ of parsomp including, 3tudont r:.lota, 1 inatruotors and dostroy property, I it la now wtobor juth, tq'(b, uno year and tiro montba later W, ru;►.i tea:: u:it.us aftc:• ":.'Iu-oo nonth trial purioa Of tho AD rcoct- u:r o':UY►flirhta continua all wnan long, tho wool: onds are vary witn air traffic, Fat. Eorrlsou door not patrol on wookondo• 'tirlsnt training-- flights have iuoruasod, very few are turniM at jo _logrous to right or left on tako off+a. Docuriontod I•lite flights aftor io:uw rM• t City „tto3L7x)-y j ,early morning flights, before daylite; 5:uo Am to dayli.te. TIL.unty fiva violations nonitorod on one weekend by Lwange Cotuity Airport Control Tower Chief, who was a rosidont or the Cambx►1dj;o at time of the abovo noted violations. ivmic Allan , Suporvising inspector F.A.A* roeoinded uovoral : dote iieonsu and warned other photo, for gross violations. ,, 0. Lo,wmey,r Chiof Division of Aoronautico, r.hil.0 r:isitirg" q� C;, �i,ridro Aptb, nc"edAviolations. st xa a fact that over soveral thouumid pors3one, aro livdng 31 a nAZJWD JWSA, whion surroul,d-9 Ilia He adowlari: Uiloontrollod Airport, auvoral vory oloso evasnes havo boon obs:orvud by myself cued atilcr rusidonta.- une piano stallod ovor our complox, tiarnod cuic? :�aclu 1.t bacY to tho Airport, ormiod. ►-'his 3ucodont t4a$ not a•.,:,o_ tod t:n tho F. A. A. Dur:.:u; Santa Aua sriaid conditi,ona, it in oxtromly mazardous !'or all rursoue litri.iig midur the twm off and landing flight patnap plat-icc :rove boon cbsurvod Just cloaririg the thirty foot p floe near ttic Canbridge, an almo3� hoadon •.;as ubsorvocl ovor tno ;,v.UJA CaaCA and ',1:1_11I...► atroot intemoctior. at approximatloy Su to 'ju feet off the ,rround- tmo pz.lot tauinr of.V vrith thu wind tho other pilot :Luncling tita:ints tno wind,, 1 1 en)--no:: lot this information ror rilot 3afaby conoors, go by uicio'-cod do Chin board; waai'0 in a throo atory building boing conritrueted on Bolen -';ilAaa, apnroximatloy Lne ThouaaW Fbat tl000j from trio and ur the Lts noiant at this phase of aonstruotion wan thirty tt 'u'tila air. --n this p art ioular mornings tooyjawan an uriusua�hd avy tira 'f to of low flying plans ovor tho cantor of ouz, complox, :;oi:inf; this L c allod Hr. Art; iterio aria as.iod him uhy thle wan :1np,)on3.i2S-t no aatod thusly- Thera ill a Telescopic Grano ,toietirg .3u,-)nlioa to the Top Floor of the now Shopping Cantor :tenor eonsty- uc L zot, oii L'o to u Chia&, and tho r1lots grant to avoid this aro lsL duo ti V,I—) nui,,;htfn of the Boom of the Crane. 1 l/ont elowu to maim a porls- I oral obnoilvation and notod that trio 800sa was axtundod to approxim- atlay o—sty t6u) footp liftli:g lumbar supplies up over the side of � Lao ciall of tao third floor, whioh vaa thirty ffo ram. Total ,seigttta i •.T- Avoiding a poriaible C,tAS:y :ran tli.e roaaon the planes r.l;; mr- ovor our home or complox - 4LUtiTY In d A vo Concorn for t,i(, poo_ile living u;uloi• tllek VI.Lght patn,, :,n .,u•.�zttly ',lio a 4ntin1;ton j3oach iollue havo no JUri:diotion a v Ui9 Airport# Including the iielicoptar s?attrol, co it soon 3.:, a .:auto of money to tiny acid control tho U iGuiMtvjji-t3 a.t.ir VAT a !no Intent or this lottor to all of you is not intondod to {i im,e incridunts to try to :Unpr rss your -&nouguto About �I but, to give you factual, information, and nhoiring trLy :.o two concornad about our L.LV,.3 and rovr,:uL' jj duo to tno uncatr� ccri, of u row pooplo. � Tn�nk y i f I 0 ?RA e. OA- D G V� G /-4r wf r 1 r , r - TUE II t I ALTIT. AT E) OF R! MY P i �?C� tFi} Min iFT� x MOM i UM A 15D 70 FT 119 FT 70 (MiA 172 54 FT 1(I3 FT 91 WE MIN ENGINE) 55 Fr 135 FT 147 J WE Of Wit) 8 R 1) FT 15t? NPAK M X ESIW) 27 R 16 FT } f E f f F • I � . r 1 • Affidavit of P"Jolicotion � ! County of Ora:�e sr I City of Huntington Ceo G Flsequhar. being duly swami on oath, says; That he is a o dtlsatt of the Utdtt+d Statsx, over the age of twenty-one ymm That he is the printer and pubUsher of the Huntington peach News & weekly newspaper of general circulation printed and pub- ' Hahed In Huntington Beach. California and circulated in the said County of Orange and elsewhere and pubUshed for the disseminatlon of local and ether news of a general character, and has a bona fide wUeer�lptlon list of ponying subscribers, And sold paper has been established, printed and published in the State of California, and County of Orange.tar at least one year next before the publication of the first ltbertlon of this notice; and the said rA%npaper Is not devoted to the interest of,or published for the entertainment of any particular d+ss, professlos>, trade, eaftg, race or denonilmilon, or ' any number thersof. s The Huntington Beads New was adjudicated a 1*0 newspaper i Of ttie wnl circulation by Judr G. It Svevel in the Superior Court t� i of Orange,County,C%Woroir►August 271h,2937 by ar&r No.A-5931. Tit the -R XUA___ TICK 0r �D TTONAt. of wl" the annexed Is a prlatN Ropy, was published In said news. piss' at UW aLe Image , munmetag A m the _ day of .001e bn o r 19.26... suxl et Slag oa the ..21 o l day of - Oo t nbe r sae., srM 1s . both days MaludM and as often during ssld period and time of publication as said paper was regttlarly Issued, and in the regular and entire law of said pewspoper proper, and not in a oupple;mertt, and said miles, was pubUftd therela on the following e1 i dates, to-Wit: Oot ,210 1976 I Pubgohet Alubseribed sad swoon fd before the this 22nd day of 13 Inbe r 19.2 j q . Notary Public •� •_. • �i:C Orange County, California r7.� . � ..................vy�ul� '�It�hiAS 0. � Netsry t„ule.Caiiferde J. ,� Oreille ceeniy i �j•t.•( My Cemmissles Gpirel 1WL SIM o! Cal!loro�aa f fi&vitof Publicatiox of GEME FARQUHAR I Publ'stw HunUnow Basch Now I i Fi ..- -.. . Cie* Lb"Glut Vivo • �I� CITV OF � UNTINGTON BEACH `� COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION CA 76-172 IKAW110N a4cif To Honorable Mayor and From Floyd G. Belsito, City Council Members City Administrator Subject MEADOWLARK AIRPORT Date October 28, 1976 Attached is a report requested by the City Council from the Building Director, John Behrens, reggarding Meadowlark Airport's compliance with the conditions of CB PO-S0. Mr. Behrens notes that a supple- mental report will be submitted on November 1st in order to provide up-to-date information for Monday night's public hearing. No back-up material is being submitted regard?.n2 the issue of any I general public nuisance caused by the airport operations. That, after all, is a matter to be determined by the testimony given at the public hearing. Under separate cover the City Council is also receiving reports from Administrative Aide Jeri Chenelle regarding the possibility of the City's acquiring the airport and from Planning Director Ed Selich regarding land use in the area of the airport. While these reports are not directly related to the public nuisance issue, they contain valuable information concerning alternative courses of action that 1 Council, on August 16th, asked staff to investigate. Respectfully submitted, 1104yd Belsito, ty dministrator FGB:p Attachment i Ion • •� 00"N CITY 0P HUNTINGTON BEACH -` INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION Nw�wcroM e�d`w To Floyd 0. UtIaL to, From John F. Behrens, Director City Administrator Building d Communi v lopnant Subject M:adowlark pate October 27, 1976 Y'L On October 6, 19769 this department submitted a report concerning the status of the subject facility with respect to CE #70-50. At that tima we reported that all of the conditions of the subject CE were satisfied with the exception that; 1. Obstruction lights had not been installed on the blast fence nor on the trees along Hail Avenua, and; 2. that the required sign identifying the run up area had not been reinstalled. As of this date the obstruction lights havd been installed on the blast fence and the sign identifying the run up area is in place. Therefore, the only condition not satiafied is the requirement for obstruction lights on the trees along Hail Avenue. This department will make another inspection and submit an updated report again on !Monday, November 1, 19769 the date of the scheduled public hearing. It aright be well to speculate on the possible consequences of the alternative actions available to the Council in considering the possible revocation of C1 #70-50. One, alternative is an action not to revoke. This essentially will maintain the status quo with the exception that the airport would be in compLianee, or virtual coanpliancep with the original conditions imposed upon the granting of CB #70-56. A second alternative would be revocation of CB #70-50. This action would eliminate the several conditions originally imposed and would deny to the airport the use of the 320' of runway approved with the granting of CE #70-50. We have been advised recently by Cal-Trans that the loss of the 320' will not result in Cba closure of the airport. The consequence then would bit continued operation without this portion of runway available. P.Lreraft would be sayuired to commence' tbeiz roll 320' south- west of the present point and also result in a point of takeoff 320' southwest of the present point. As a result, aircraft would undoubtedly be i.t a lower elevation when passing over properties adjacent to the southwest of the airport, Noise would therefore be somewhat greater than at present. The shortened runway might also represent a certain degree of additional hazard from operations. D OCT 2 8 1976 CITY OF HUNTINGTP"1 GEACf1 ADMINISIRATIVE OFFICE Y Floyd G. Belsito Page 2 October 27, 1976 A third alternative could be the maintaining of CE #70-50, the deletion of the requirement for a blast fence and perhaps even permission to use a further sagment of the runway, in addition to the 32010 for takeoff purposes. This could have the opposite effect of atternative two. It could move the point of cospmencemant of toll and takeoff to the northeast and result in aircraft being at a greatsc altitude when passing over properties to the southwest and some dimiuution in resultant noise. At the prior hearing concerning CB 70-50, a little over two years ago, both this department and Cal-Traus recomeaded the elimination of the blast fence based on the fact that it nerves no 4ctual function cs a blast fence and that Its presence could constitute some additional hazard as an obstruction to clear on landing. JFB/vl I i C1TV OF HUNTINGTON BliACH INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION NWI1MLItlN 1iK1t To ' Ployd G. Belsito, FromJohn . ehrens, Director City Administrator Buil a Comm»nity Developmen Suh;eat Meadowlark Airport Date Octob r 6, 1976 I it is my suggestion that you recommend to the City Council at their meeting this evening that they set a public hearing for their meeting on Tuesday, October 26, for the purpose of considering the revocation of Conditional Exception 070-50 . Enforcement of the above Conditional Exception ham been a difficult, on and off process. On prior occasions there was substantial compliance with these conditiions, however, we have been in an effort over the last two or three months to obtain proper and permanent compliance. In connection with this we submitted a formal request to the City Attorney's office on September 17, 1976, to institute legal proceedings to enforce those conditions. On October 5 we were advised by the City Attorney's j office that enforcement of conditions of approval on a criminal basis was not possible. As a result we are recommending the scheduling of a hearing to consider the revocation. An inspection today indicates that the conditions of CE 070-50 are satisfied with the exception that the warning lights have not been installed on. the blast fence or on the trees Ed t the sign indicating the area for engine rust up has not been reestablished. In addition to the above, two other violations have been noted on these premises in recent weeks. On September 20 a notice was issued by the department citing the fact that a horse corral had been established in violation of zoning requirements. T e not ce stated that the owner should remove this facility or make application for an Administrative Review. On Thursday, September 231 Mr. Art Nerio was in my office to discuss this matter. I again told him that it would be necessary } either to remove the facility or file the application at the Planning Department counter. Mr. Norio left City Hall without making contact in the Planning Department. As of this date the horse corral remains J on the property. I �I f M - Floyd G. Beleito Page 2 October 6, 2976 The second matter is the fact that there has been an additional business, known as Red Barnes, established on the preMiz This activity deals in aircraft Gales. This activity had previously been initiated on the airport And after receiving notice of violation from this department was discontinued. The business has now been resstablished and we have been advised by the owner that he does not intend to comply with our notice of violation. JFB/vl. 1 ti 1 i s CITY CW HUNTINGTON BEACH � 1 INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION !a�rr+coM w,�cw ! To John F. Behrens, From 0aicktp-1pla, Director Chief Laud Use Technician Subject Status Report - C.B. 70-50 Date October 6, 1976 Meadowlark Airport 5141 Warner Ave. IW inspection of the subject site on October 6, 1976 revealed the following violations of C.E. 70-50 still exists 1. Coaditiou f2 - The pre-take off run-up pad is not plainly marked "Perform engine and pre-ta'te off check here". 2. Condition 44 - Obstructica lights have not been ,Installed on ' the blast fence or on the trees along the northerly property line. In addition to the above, two additional uses have been established without: benefit of adminietrativc approval. 1. An airplane sales business called "Red Barnes" has been established by Mr. Greg Hein who has been informed of the violation. Mr. Hein indicated at one time that he intended to file for administrative approval of this use and during a more recent contact, claimed that he has documents to prove that his use is a continuing non-conforming use established several years ago. Mr. Hein has been requested to forward this documentation to our department for review and he has agreed to do so. , Also,- a request for prosecution is being prepared to be for.- warded to the City Attorney. 2. A horse corral has been recently built, housing one horse. A i letter was -sent September 20, 1976 to Mr. Herio requesting that he file for administrative approval of this use and on October 6, 1976 a request for prosecution was filed with the City Attorney because he has ;failed to comply. There are other zoning violations an the subject that have not been approached as yet. Moat of theme could be considered relatively minor except for storage of wooden boxes which are strewn about the dwelling units (a probable fire haaard) and two inoperable vehicles (one dilapitated house trailer and an unidentified trailer-type vehicle). j WDL/ecd l • .J� City Of I-IciiitilIgto i Beach DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P.O. Box 190 CALIFC_ZNIA.926I5 September 20, 1976 1 Subjects 5141 Warner Avenue Horse Corral Art Nerio 5141 Warner Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Dear Mr. Nerio: A search ok our records in conjunction with a field, l.nspection conducted on September 16, 1976, revealed that horse corrals have been erected in violation of Section 9631, Uses Permitted. Said Section requires the filing and approval of an Administrative Review before the Board of Zoning Adjustments. You are hereby requested to file necessary documents within ten (10) days from raceipt of this letter. If there are any questions, please contact the undersigned at 536-5241.' sincerely, _ i DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & COMHUNITY DEVELOPMENT i J01IN F. BE11RENS1 Director VICK MOMS, Land Use Technician r VM/vl I I i City of Huntington Beach P.O. Box 190 DEPARTMENT CF CALIFORNIA 9UN {�! BUILDING 9: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 17, 1976 Subjectt Htedowlark Airport; 5141 Warner Ave. Art Norio 5141 Warner Ave. Huntington Seach, CA 92649 Dear Hr. Narios An inspection of the Meadowldrk Airport facility on Aug;uot L6, 1976 • Teveals that the Conditions of Approval of Conditional Exception f70-50 and the Conditions of Operation have not been complied v th. These violations are as followst Conditiosai Exception d70-50 1. Condition 44 - Obstruction lights have not been installed on the blast fence or on the trees along the north property lint, 2. Condition 06 - Signing does not appear to adequately-indicate proper use of runway area. Conditions of Operatioa 1. Condition 41 - (As modifiel on June 2, 1975) The blast fence has not been shortened to 4 feat in height, the myoporuaw planted behind the blast fence are not maintained to the minimum 4 feet in height, the slatting of the chain link fence has not been repaired and maintained and the existing 10' blast fenca is in a state of disrepair. 2. Cnditlon i2 - The pre-takeoff run up pod le not plainly marked "Paz'form engine and pre-takeoff checks here". 3. Condition #3 - The original run up pad at the northerly end i of Runway 19 remains intact. no asphalt paving ties be-,n retained but is not marked as unusable. Art Nerio Page 1 ' August 17 1976 Since requests for compliance have been sent previously, without result we will have no alternative but to refer tilis matter to the City Attorney, unless all corrections are made within ten days of receipt of this letter. • +1 If you have any questions, please contact tha undersigned at 536-5241. I f� Sincerely, 13S-ARTHENT OF 6UILDINr, & CO►` IUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOHN F. BEHRENS, Director HALTER D. LIPPS, Chief Land Use Techvician WDL/ecd i ? 1 �yf .,',•lq:: ... .l:s..sw:.y•..0.....,..........__.... .. ._...-.—.. .... .... ... .._.._.. - ..-..�.�..........�...w.—... • ... ._ .�....L:l. {, �u.f.+K.. Page #7 - Council Mir" a - 6/2/75 - The clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met anti that she had received no written communications or protests to Zone Case No. 74-10. Mayor Gibbs declared the hearing open. There being no one present to speak on the matter and there being no protests filet!, el_ther oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. On motion by Duke, Council adopted F.nviros.mental Impact Report No. 74-12 and approved 'Gone Case No. 74-18 by the following votes AYESs Wieder, Bartlett, Matney, Shipley, Dukes, Gibbs _ NOES: None ABSENT: Coen The Clerk was directed to give Ordinance No. 1979 a first reading by title - "AN ORDINANCe OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AMENDING THE INNTINGTOU BEACH ORDINANCE CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 9061 THEREOF i0 PROVIDE FOR CHANGE OF ZONING ON REAL PRO- PERTY LOCATED NORTHERLY OP ADAMS AVENUE AND WESTERLY OF NE'WLAND STREET (ZONE CASE i On motion by Duke, Council Waived furthor reading of Ordinance No. 1909 by .the following vote: i, AYES: Wieder, Bartlett, Matne,!, Shipley, Duke, Gibbs NOES: None ABSENTS Coen (� PUBLIC HEARING - CO11DITIONAL EXCEPTIO13 70-50 - APPROVED i Mayor Gibbs announced that this was the day and hour set for a public hearing to ' consider a modification to the conditions of approval for Conditional Exception No. 7C-50 whi^.h permitted a 500 foot expansion to an existing runway at the Meadowlark Airport. The modification would amend Condition 41 to read approximately as follows: "The blast fence shall remain in its present position and shall be reduced in height i to approximately 4 feet. Plant material shall be installed immediately behind the bast fence. The slatting of the chain link fence along Heil Avenue shall be repaired r; :.nd thereafter maintained with the plant screen barrier." The subject property is l located just south of Heil Avenue, east of 9olsa Chica Street and west of Graham Street:, in the R1, Low Density Residential District. fi The Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met and that abe had received no communications or written protests to the mutter. The Planning Director presented a resume' of the Planning Commission's reasons for recommanding approval of Conditional Exception No. 70-50. Mayor Gibbs declared the hearing open. There being no one prevent to speak on the matter and there being no protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by the Mayor. ,'• gem Ma - Council Minutes - 6/ A motion was made by Councilman Duke that based on the findings of Council, the property owner, residents of the area and the pilots, that safety is a consideration in said amendment, that the modification to Condition No. 1 of Conditional Exception No. 70-50 be approved as follows: The blast fence shall rem.l:: 'n its present location and shall be reduced in height to four (4) foet. Myoporums shall be planted directly behind the blast fence and maintained to a height of four feet. The slatting of the chain link fence along [foil Avenue shall be repaired and thereafter maintained with the' plant screen barrier. The motion was passed by the following vote: AYES: Wieder, Bartic6`, Matney, Fhipley, Duke, Gibbs NOES: None ABSENT: Coen PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL TO DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 75-4 - APPEAL DENIED I Mayor Gibbs announced that this was the day and hoer set for a public hearing on an appeal filed by William C. Cdrlberg, President of ;Iarlberg Montessori Schools, Newport Deach, to the denial by the Planning Ccmmission of Conditional Use Permit No, 75-40 ' to permit the establishment: of a private school through ages 12 for approximately 120 students with the required play area Facilities and off-street parking. The subject site is located on the west side of Goldenwest a_rest$ approximately 420 feet north f of Breeland nrive in the R1 Low Dens:.ty Residenti,..' District. The Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for notification, publication and posting had been met and that she had received no ccmmunications or written protests to Laid appeal or to the recommendation of denial of the Planning Commission. The Planning Director presented a resume' of the Planning Commission's reason for i recommending denial of Conditional Use Permit 75-4. He also presented slices of the area for Council's consideration. i Mayor Gibbs declared the hearing open. Mr. William Carlberg, President of Carlborg Montessori Schools, addressed Council regarding the reasons why he believed tha Conditional Use Permit should be approved and stated that he believed the school would be an asset to the area. Mrs. Karen West, resident of the area, addressed Council in favor of the proposed use. +f Mrs. Premerton, resident of the area, addressed Council in favor of the Conditional. I Exception. Mr. Carl Farnsworth, repreLinting the owner -of the church property to the north, addressed Council and stated that the rocx bands mentioned as having been on their property were not connected to their organization. lie informed Council that he believed the school would be a compatible use. Mrs. :iickey Korba, 6962 Moonbeam Drive, City, addressed Council and presented an informal petition listing approximately 13 residents of the area opposed to the granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 75-4. She then presented reasons why she did not believe the school would be compatible to the area. Mrs. Barbara E. Willis, 15802 Rollins Lane, City, addressed Council in opposition to the proposed use as she believed it would cause traffic congestion. Mr. George Snyder, resident of Goldenwest Park to the north, addressed Council and stated that he did not believe the proposed school use was a good use for R1 zoned prnr,rty. e... R�'�EIVED 1974 b J S 3 0 PLANNING D John Behrens , To Building Diractor uI• 9 4 74 CONDUIONAL BXCUPTIO 0 70- _ The City Council at the ZLppe!`inp amcrtdec��, ; ;the conditions of Conditional hxceution 070-50 to relocate the blast fence agains*_t]aq ro_nr , fence and bushes at Meadowlark Airport. I i aLEASE REPLY TO StpnoOZI cc: Dick Harlow David .Rowlnnds City Administrator I 1 a r l i � 1 Dole Signed AS A6S SIND PARTS I AND 1 Wlfll CARCONS INIACI. /•gLASSOwil4/41S 1A•I 1 WITS at Il[TpRNSD Willi 01.011, r ry� .,hags 15 - c:uuncil Mimes - 9/3/14 Chaatbor by the City clerk and D:3:eCL7r of Public Works, and that G. S. MacDonald Construction Company, Hontr(-qe, California, was the low bidder with a bid in the account of $288,508. The Director of Public Works recommended that Council award the bid to G. S. MacDonald Cons.trurtion Company. E:-nvironnuntal Impaor. Report i No. 73-13 was adopted by Council oa September 17, 1973. The bids submitted were as followss G. S. MacDonald Const. Co. Montresa $2860508.00 Guy Atkinson Company Long Beach $308,790.00 Elco Corporation Iong Beach $3091200.00 ECCO Contractors Santa Ana *390,213.00 A motion was made :)y Councilman ltatney tu award the contract for Project CC-240 to G. S. MacDonald Construction Company, Montrose, California, the lowest responsible hiddor for the bid amount of $280#5080 hold all other bids until G. S. MacDonald Constvuetlon Company has executed the contract for said work and filed the necessary bonya and insurance, and direct the City Clerk to notify the unsuccessful bidders of the action and return their bid bonds forthwith. The motion was passed by the following votes i AYES$ Shipley, Bartlett, Gibbs, Matnoy, Wieder, Duke, Coon HOESs .Vona AFiSENTs None DID AWARD - CENTRAL LIBRARY INTERIOR LANDSCAPING - CC-300 The City Clerk read a coamuu.lcation from the Public Works Department stating '.1:at bids for Project CC-308 - Construction, furnishing And installation of the Central Library Interior Landsvap.ing, were received and opened on Thursday, i August 29, 1974 nt 10:00 A.M. in the Council Chamber by the City Clark and Director of Public Wcrks, and that Sharecroppers Inc. , Orange, California, wac the low bidder with a bid in the amounti of $54#502. The Director of Public: Works rsecommnndnd that Council award the bid to Sharecroppers Inc., Orange, California. The bids submitted were as follawn s Sharecroppers Inc. Orange $54,502.00 Robert E. Sapian, Inc. Culver city $65#413.00 Roy C. Barnett Riverside $70,000.00 (corrected) The City Administrator reported on matters relative to the proposed project. A motion was made by Councilwoman Gibbs to coward the contract for Project CC-300 to Sharecroppers Inc., Orange, California, the lowest respon3ibl2 bidder for the bid amount of $540,502, hold all other bids until Sharecroppere, Inc., has executed j the contract for said work and filed necessary bonds and insurance, and direct the City Clerk to notify the unsuccessful bidders of the action and return their bid bonds forthwith. The motion was passed by the following vote: i l I 1 A'.17S: Shipley, ,Bartlett, Gibbs, Matnuy, Wieder, Duke, Coen NOES: None ABSENTS None PUBLIC HEARING - REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 70-50 - AMENDMENTS APPROVED Mayor Coen announced that this was the day and hour set for the continuance of a public hearing from the meeting of August. 19, 1974, for the purpose of considering revoking and declaring Conditional Exception No. 70-50 null and void, which was to permit a 500 foot ixpansion to an existing runway at they Meadowlark Airport, The subject property is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, east of Solna Chic& Stxeet in the Ri Single Family Residence District. r i �J �• 'pAge 16 Council Minutes ,/74 The Director of Building and Community Development informed Council that there we:e minor amendments to his recommendations which had been suLomitted to Council in his coaaavnication dated August 28, 1974. He stated that relative to Recom- mendacion lip he would recommend that the slatting of the chain link fence be xepaired and thereafter maintained along with the planted screen barrier. le connection with Recommendation A3, he would recommend that the original I run,ip pad adjacent to the very end of the runway (Runway 19) be removed or marked as unusable which means that the paving could bu retained and could help in o3nnection with any potential dust problems. He s;.•- ted that if these recommendations were stet, based on the recommendations contained in the letter dated August 20, 1974 from Mr. Earl L. Tucker, Aviation Consultant with the Division of Aeronautics of the state Department of Transportation, to would recommend that: the Conditional Exception not be revoked. Discutision was held between the Council and Mt. Tucker regarding tic mAttei, inclwiing the disposition of the blast fence. Mrs. Margaret Wilson, resident of `lte area, addressed Council and requested that the nciso element relative to the airport not be increased. Mr. Davi3 Diamond, representing the Home Council, addressed the Council i, and spoke regarding matttere pertaining to the blast fence and the noise clement. Mr. Larry Lindenberg, operator at Meadowlark Airport, addressed Council and stated that he believed the blast fenca was outdated and recommended that .a slope indicator be installed at the airport. Mr. Tucker than commented on the matter of installing a elope ,indicator, Mr. John Turner, Manager of Meadowlark Airport, addressed Council regarding the reasons for his opposition to the blast fence ar.4 discussion was held between Mr. Turner and the Council. Hr.. WJ.11iam Gamble, pilot, addressed Council and urged that the blast fence be remved or moved back. There being no one further present to speak on the matter and there being no further protests filed, either oral or written, the hearing was closed by tho Mayor. A motion aas made by Councilwoman Gibbs to uc�ade to the zeconmendations of the Director of Building and Community Development that Conditional Exception 70-50 not be revoked subject to compliance with the five :ecomamendatione outlined in his letter dated August 28, 1974 as follows% I 1. The blast fence be relocated to a position as close to the north it boundary fence as possible, the slatting of the chain link fence be repaired and thereafter .maIntained along with the planted screen I barrier. 2. The pre-takeoff runup pad be maintained in its existing position and plainly markeO "perform engine and pre-takeoff checks here." 3. That the origin": runup pad adjacent to the very end of the runway (Runway 19) be removed or marked as unusable which means that the paving could be retained and could help in connection with any potential dust problems. 4. M&L.tain the existing displaced threshold markinni. s Page 17 - Council ?Unu, - 9/3/74 5. Lstablis:s and effectively enforce an airgnct rule requiring aircraft operators to conduct pru-takeoff •-hecke in the dasignated area and whan ready for takeoff, and air t,.af'fie permits, to move aitflout delay to the wry and of the runway :nj commence takeoff roll without stopping for further aircraft wigtns checks. Following discussion by Cn nril, Mayor Coen directad that at such time as the lease between the property owner mull Mr. Turner may be negotiated he would direct that staff bring back to Covncil the matter of imposing a condition relative to the in-- stallation of a slope indicatur. The motion wads by Councilworian Wieder was then passed by the following votai AYES: Shipley, Hamlett, Gibbs, Matney, Wieder, Coen N08Sr Duka ABSBNTs None ME ;LL:ST .0 ADDRESS COUNCIL BICYCLE THEFTS Mr. Kennedy, 19281 Newhr.ven Dane, City, addressed Council regarding the numerous bicycle thefts his family h^d expezienced and spoke regarding the extent of the problem, Discussion was holi and the Police Chief spoke regarding the increase is thefts and atatod that the beat solution was to istscrihe the. license number on the bike ao well as following the C!.ty licensing procedure. REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL - InlEODORE HIC110W i M_. Theodore Nichols, 412 8th Street, City, addressed Council regarding the claim he had filed against the City and the Deputy City Attorney advised Kr. Nichols of the reasons for the City's procedure in this regard. REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL - PHIL PECK CALIF COALITION OF ANIMAL OWNERS Mr. Phil Peck, representing the California Coalition of Animal Owners, addressed I Council and clarified certain portions of a recent article appearing in a local newspaper, stating that there is no correlation between their group and the current recall action. Mr. Peck urged that the first reading of nrdinance No. 1942, scheduled later in the meeting, relative to the Huntington Beach Animal Welfare and Control Cosml.ssion be approved. PUBLIC HEARING - MA NURSERY - DECISION DEFERRED TO IZY75 Mayor Cuen announced that thi's was the day and hour set for a public hearing for the purpose of receiving evidence that a public nuisance exists at the Oda Nursery located in the vicinity of property bounded by Brookhurst Street on the west, Ward Street on thq east, Kukui Orivu on the north and Kamxela Drive to the southr located in an RI Low Density Residential District, and for the possible direction by the City Attorney to take appxopriste legal action to abate such nuisance. The City Clerk informed Council that all legal requirements for notification, publicatl.on and posting had barn met and that she had received a corm-anication from Oda Nursery together with an informal petition listinq approximately 110 signatures tl favor of the nursery. An informal petition listing approximately 1 80 signaturea in opposition to the nusery was submitted by Mrs. Francis Zohlman at the July 15, 1974 meeting. She stated that letters from Allan R. Rivelli, 10361 Kamuela Drive, in favor of the nurser;, operation and from Mr. ana Mrs. William A. Bechtel, 10242 Kukui Drive, in opposition to the operation had been received, Mr. Richard A. Harlow Page two In a_n aggressive attempt to enhance the overall safety aspects of the airports the Division of Aeronautics submits the following recommendations: 1. If the requirement for the blast fence still exists. we recommend it be relocated to a position as close to the north toundary fon-,e as possible. Maintain the re-takeoff runup ,ad in its Existing position :.. p P I ._ and Plainly mirk it "perform engine and pre-takeoff checks here '. i 3. Remove the asphaltic concrete runup pad that is presently adjacent to the very end o2 the runway (Runway 19) t close to the north boundary fence. 4. haintain tke Existing displaced threshold markings. �. Establish, and widely advertise to all airport users9 an l airport rule requiring aircraft operators to conduct pre- I ' ta:.eoff checks in the desi;nated area. ;-.'hen ready for ; -takeoff, and air traffic permits, move without delay to I the very end of the runway and commence takeoff roll without stopping for further aircraft/engine checks. 6. Widely advertise to Huntington Beach residents these joint efforts to enh>3nae safety, and community relations at Meadowlark. These recommendatfons. should result in: 1. Removing the existing hazard to flight operations on the runway. 2. Maintaining the existing noise level/dust control at the north end of the runway. 3. Increaeed flight safety for aircraft departing to the south by providing more available runway. 4. Enabling aircraft departing to the south to gain more altitude ov3r airport property, which will result in a higher altj wuua over ;;araer Avenue and reduce the noise level acid exposure time to p,iople on the ground. 5, There should be no chang3 in approach/landing procedures. h. No changes are roquired in the California State Airport Permit. i I • IrATR 01 CAUFORNIA—IUSINESS AND 11ATISPORfATION AGENCY RONAID REAGAN, Cle..re.t I T DEPARTMENT OF TP.ANEPORTATION DIVISION Of AEROK4MCS EXKUT1YE AIVORf RACLOW0, CAU10M A Hit! � AUG 2 s Isla RECE1vEo AUG 2 81974 j PLANNING DEPT. •- Mr. Richard A. Harlow Director of Planning City of Huntington Beach P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Dear Mr. Harlow: On August 15 1974 the Division of Aersnautics conducted a routine safety/airport permit compliance inspection of the Meadowlark Airport. During this inspection it was observed that the blast fence had been reinstalled across the north end of the runway. The Division is aware of the reason the fence was originally installed) and consider that a function of local government. Our concern is with safety of flight operations at the airport, rind in its present position we feel the fence creates` a. definite hazard. This hazard is not restricted to aircraft lan&:, at the airport, but also to aircraft departing to the __uth by further reducing the amount of runway available for take- off on as already critically short runway. Aircraft engine noise and dust caused by propeller blast have long been areas of concern in airport community j relations. We recognize our responsibility to airport operators/-,tsers, as well as to the residents adjacent to airports, to ro%co mo)id procedures that will not only increase flight safety but enhance airport/community relations. Many changes have occurred at Meadowlark since the blast fence was originally installed. The chain ? ink fence has been slatted the oleander bushes along the fence have 1 grown until they now provide an almost impenetrable neural barrier; the pre•-takeoff engine runup pad has been relocated further south, and a use pattern has been establish( and accepted by the airport users. I . i Mr. Richard A. Harlow Page three These proposals were discussed at an informal meeting with the airport owner and Huntington Beach city officials on August 219 1974. During this meeting tho subject of reinstalling night lights at Meadowlark was addressed. Subsequent research reveals that an amended airport permit to install runway lights was ` approved by the Division on April 5, 1971. This approval is _ still valid and includes the runway lights and establishes the I . requirement for obstruction lights on the power lines to the north. If the blast fence is retained in Its present position, abstraction lights will also bo required an vhe tap of the fence. We understand Meadowlark Airport will be the subject of a public hearing in Huntington Beach on September 3, 1974. if additional information is requireal or that we may be of assistance in any ways please feel free to contact us. Sincorely, I WILLIAM F. SHEA Chief Earl A. Tucker Aviation Consultant cc: District Transportation Office J/07 John Turner Meadowlark Airport Manager Art Nerio i r I i I i I ' I • r s'rAFF 11F.PUKT Co.idltlonal Exception No. 70-50 Applicants John 'turner DAtet October 19, 1971 1. This agenda item is before the Planning Commission pursuant to condition cif approval #9 of Conditional Exception No. 70-59 a request to permit a 50D ft. expansion of an existing runway at the Headoviark Airpsrt= also, to alinw two existing trailers to be used for temporary office and &'light school. The subject property is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, east of Bolaa Chico Street its the RL Single Family Residence District. 2. This application was approved by the Planning Coradssion on Octuber 20, 1970 subject to the following conditions of Ldt:o all 1. The runway extension shall be redu320 f ,i however, in no case shall the extension be closer than 375 f h ses on ileil Avenue. 2. A blast fence shall be installed 100 ft. north 'of the end of the runway. The precise location, size and building materials shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. IIy 3. That portion of the runway and taxiway north of the blast fence shall be removed. I 4. Obstructioa lights shall be installed on the blast fence and any trees along the north property line. Alsos any trees along Lne north property line shall be limited to 23 ft, in height. Placement and type of lights shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments, 5. Provisions shall be made for dust and noise control on the site. Such Oist and i noise control methodr shall be approved by the Board of Zoning Adjuatmants, v. Signs shall be posted to inform pilots of the proper use of the airport anal runway area. 7, All violations of the City Code mall be corrected Within 60 days. 8. A review by the PLanuing Commission of conditions 1 through 7 shall be made on DecemJer 15, 1970 to determine the applicant's compl. !nce With the rbe/c conditions, ibis conditional exception shall become null and void if the Planning Commission determines that conditions 1 through 7 have not been complied with. 9. Conditional Exception No. 70-50 shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission during the month of October, 1971 to determine whether or not additional �• conditions should be required. However, in the event the Planning Commission determines that added safety precautions should be imposed, said conditional I exception may be reviewed prior to October 31, L971. In case of a review by the Planning Commission, the applicant shall be notifieA in writing at least 10 days prior to the review. 1O. The use of .the trailers -s temporary facilities shall terminate in October, 1971 or construction shall be started and proceeding without undue delay on permanent structures. I CE No. 70-50 Page 2 3, The Planning Commission, at Jse uecemter 15. I970 meeting, reviewed Conditional ' Exception tin. 70-50 for complionce with established canditions of approval as per condition No. Be The Co=19sion declared the Conditional Exception null and void because conditions Non. 1 through 7 had not been met within the prescribed time. This decision was based on the follcwing findings of fact: a) Informatiun contained in a memo directed to Doyle Miller, City Administrator from O11In C. Clevel-n+# Director of Uuilding and Safnty, dated December 150 1970 indicated that trill applicant had not complied with the required .- cunditions. b) Field investigation performed by Cearasissioner Duke Indicated the followings 1. The blast fence Was not properly constructed according to the plan. 2, wheel stops were not fixed to the runway. 3. Electrical wiring pertaining to the blast fence did not appear to be properly installed. 4. The Planning Commission'a action was overruled by the City Council on January 4, 1971 at which time the City Council added the following conditions: a) That until the State Issues a permit to allow night flying, night flying i shall be proh+hfted and runway lights turned off from sunset to sunrise; `,tat after the State issues a permit * to allow night flying, night flying t prohibited and runway Lights turned off from lwo hours after sunset jr 10:00 P.M., wh{chever first occurs, to sunrise; I i c) That the violation of any condition suet forth by this conditional exception including the two above conditions be grounds for suspension or revocation o said conditional exception un previous notice to applicant and heating by City Council. 5. Pursuant to the conditions of approval, the Board of Zoning Adjustments reviewed the plot plans and attached the following conditions of approval: a) The blast fence sha:l 'be constructed at a location as the specifications as delineated on the plot plan received (November 18, 1970. .. b) Obstruction lighting and markings on the blast fence shall conform to State and F.A.A. standards. c) The Board of 7aning Adjustments reserves the right to review for dust control on site at any time. 6. With regard to the conditions of t!pruval established by the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Adjustments, the Building Department has submitted a report giving the status on these requirements. A copy of this report is attached for your review. NZM 0 CE No. 70-50 Page 3 With regard to the hours of operation and night flying, it should be noted L11.1t In addition to the requirements set forth by the City Council on January 4, 1971 the city has adopted an ordinbnce (Article 608) specifically dealing with tuts sub.1cct. A copy of a memorandum from the Police Department regarding Mils subject is attached for your review. I I 1 l -pi l t Iona l Encepti on No . 70- 50 1in•.l; t ions o f Approval I' : ..�!,� ��.. .��5�i.i i0_2Ur•f 0 w-}lican,t: John Turner r I l 1 . The runway extension sliall be reduced to 320 ft ; houevvi•, in no case shall the extens'_on be closer than 375 ft . from houses on Neil Avenue . 2 . That vortion of thr runway and taxiway not permitted in this conditional exception sliall be removed. 3 . A ,last funce ' sllall be ins;.alled 100 ft: . from the north y propert line , in line with the end of the runway and taxiway. The precise locntion, size and building }materials shall be cUproved by the ' Uoord sf zoning Adjustments . Obstruction lights stall Ue instilled on the bla::t fr_ne-:t and .any trees aiang the north property line. Also , any trees zler% the north property .line shell be lirlited to 20 ft . in height. 111aca::ant and � type of light, shall be approved by the hoard of Zoning Adjustm•"nts . S . Provisions shall be }Wade for dust and noise control on the site . Stic!t dust and noi:-c control methods shall be approved by the Board of Toning Adjustments . G . Sipas shall die ►?u 5ted to inforn pilots of the pruper.use of :he air• ort and rltn::a area . P Y 7. All violations of tice City Code shr_11 tic corrected withil, cr d•:"ys. S. A revict: by the Plan'liing Commission o.f condi duns 1 tltioury:t 7 shall he made oil December 15 , 1970 , to determine tlly applicant ' s coo-plivnce i with the above conditions. This conditional excu-ption shall becu.:•.: null and void if the Planning Commission det rrrtlnes that rotlui C:U11S f 1 tltrougli 7 have not been complied witli. V. Conditional Exception No. 70-50 shall be reviewed by th^ P7 nning Commission duritt;; the monril of October, 1971 , to dctCTninQ !;%eth-r o: not additional conditions -41iould be :•arn1 xcO . llntrevcr. ttt r;:,a event the 131-annln- Commission dat:er:;!ine!; t;ltii.* .•.'nZnu- ti.rnns should be iir.nostct, said conL11tiuna? W.- : I d prior to October 31, 1971 . In case of ,a rvLi %%, by :Ile Planning Ccmnisslon, the: applicant shall be notified in writini. ^t lew.;t 10 days prior to the rcvlew. I 10 . Use of the trailers its tc:a[7crar}• �'}�Ci� ? !'i� S e��l,ill tCT}lL}li(tC ill October , 1971 , or Call traction : ia? l be stazt-�d :!:,cl proccer"1.11„ a thout L!!t(ll:" 6-C 111}• Oil I • dp (1) that un-lil tn� State issues a pezmit to allow night flying , ::ig,:t flying be prohibited and run-,av lights turned off =.-om s nc;-us-,w to suns-:l + (21 that, _k Lor tie State issues a perr:it to allow night flying , night flying be prohibited and runway lights � turned vif from two hours after sundo e or 10:00 p.M. , ;Mche•::r first occurs , to sung-% ""rt (3) that rmy 023tio❑ of any ccnditiJnin-;- this Conditicnal r::eer�ticn , i�c�•c:�irg the L%_0 above conditions , oil?. be orouad� io_ •�sY�nsiBn cr reVCCcItiUR of -t' 'e Conditional E::ccption rnn ;revieus notice to applicant and hearinS i by the CIL%' CorLSnci l . _...:n cn rr;ed . . i i t E ' - - AL - -- r �`c:. ��_ •i- IL Publish '10/21/76 POSTAGE PAID pop tc srds 400 ttJ NOTICE OF 1° WC HKARING REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL EXCITTIO4 70-50 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be hold by ttl City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Ht:ntlr4ton Beach, at the hour of 7:00 P.M. or an soon thereafter ass P0281ble,, on lbnday, the ���, diny of November x9 � for the purpose of considering whuthex the manner of oparrtion of Headowlark Airport canatitutcs a public nuisance and the revocation of co,uiitioral Exception M. 70-50. Said Public bearing will bo hold pursuant to the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance :.ode Section 9037.2 which states in part, "Any building or structure sot up, created, built, moved or maintained and/or any use of property contrary to the provisions of this Article anC/or any conditions attached to the granting of any Conditional Exception pursuant thereto shall be and the nano is hereby declared to be unlawful and a public nuizanm and the duly constituted authorities of Huntington Beach shall, upon order of the City Council, inw..dintely commence action or actions, proceeding or proceedings for the abatement, removal and enjoin- ment thereof in the manner provided by law and shall take such otbor steps and shall apply to such cooxt or courts as may have jurisdiction to giant such relief as will abate and remove such building, structure, or use and roatrain and enjoin any person, firm, or corporation from setting up, erecting, building, moving or MAintaining any ouch building or utructure or using any property contrary to the provisions of thin Article." Said Conditional Exception originally permitted a�fot nxpanaion to an existing runway at the Meadowlark Airpurt and allowed two ex-sting trailers to Le used for temporary office and flight school purposes. The subject property is located on the north side of Warner Avenue, east of Doloa. Chica Street in the R1 Single Family Residential District. A legal dr.scription is on fila in the Planning Department Office. All intekested persons are invited to attend •aid hearing and express their opinions fm on any aide of thus present controversy in issue. Further inforwation maey be obtalvied from the Office of the City Clerk. UATgD: October 14, 1976 CITY alp• RUKIilMW ERMH BY: AUCLS H, Wentworth City Clerk COIiUrFIaML EOCEM N 70-50- Uctx*w 18, L976 146-041-22.e l`%-00-336 146-043-419 Gmedmagh, Ghadyn Nillw, FLvft1Cic H Millie, Vicboc L 15401 Santa Anita In 5192 CRL40 s Dr. 5201 W- I Ave Fu� Itech, CA 93649 Ekv* sKxbrr ► CA 4260 Bcntisgbrn Bmclt, C7t 92649 146-043-329 146-Nal-13n 2%W10ye Desks C 146-043-42a Grangpr, James R 5202 Calioa.2e Dr Heatvi w1o, Anthony G 16411 Santa Anita In Umti Vtm aw-A-., CA 92649 5191 Heil Ava Runtjmtm peach, ca 92649 RmttLx"i Dewh,, M 92647 146-043-338 3L46-043-43s 146-041 14a uwir Micsaetl Hic',k,-Bawh, Fred H Cassera, Philip J Jti' Coal..Arft [tom• S191 tki I Ave 16412 Golciean Mtn In NPAcht, CA 92649 IAmtingbcn Haach, CA 92649 tiunUMbm Hearh, C h 92649 504-3.7-369 146-043-44a 146-041-Ba Putrlight. *Jhn A B u rban, Jaws T Nalsm, Craig H J Calianta Dr. 5161 Dail Avb 16402 Goldn Gate In tm Beach CA 92649 Ftcz 4ington Bc�fi, M 92649 IftmU gbon Beach► C A 92647 3-35e 146�-0�43-45s 14 E-27.109a Jctatt D Scott, Foul E Deem, Ai�ctna-d M 5232 Calirnts Der 5251 ftil Ave Jay, Melvin A Bes&, C& 92619 Hmtin?born retch, CA 9xo49 5200 Heil Ihmtlrt7tm FOsch, CA p2549 3-360 1r16-043-46a djVV Atitx H , Rich ad vt MD41 42 Cetlisest;r Lr p1tr1 Fat It D 3 ,I�m*Avgtat B�dt, CA92649 H�Lc9;, PA 186031t2 1 3-37r 146-042- IU 14G-271-08s ► DO-mid P A&W Im# Philip 'a Jay, Melvin A et al 1 llw 59142 DKOCk U t St: 3261 Druid Ln i. I1rh, CA 92649 Rmtih7tm DQ"-fit CA 92646 We ALsuitida, CA 90720 N3-39• 146-042-13r I46-321-20,?1.22.23r 146-t 1A w ! 8�h m r Qw. C l3nrfaarie, Del j it s 9458 Ga rdada km 15411 "in G m In 3941 Myra Ave i ltafteein Vai1�y, Ch 92700 HesttimW 1 Be�adte CA 92649 hos Alsmitxoe, CA 90?20 J 146-043-39r 146-A';1-14s 146-241-23,24.25e BAdw, II%owd Nett Ef+eld, Jrem L Nwio, Mao at al i SZ21 t8slI hARm 16W sa ratop In 7795 Wastmirtrter Ave ttington Beds, CA 92649 Br*istgbn Desch, CA 92649 , CA 92683 I1�s i 146-043--406 116-042-LU 146-232-01! Cid,34 , may M Naar, Stanlsy K Trobt a r, Jamm H 5211 hail an Acxiity 5141 Sta1lim Cir nins4 rntT W+^••qh m ww4c I1et p /'Ar+pw tfintMr yMn ftswh, r'A 9264q TOW CCNDx' KAM E ?=ON 70-50 October 10, 1976 163-042`4a 163-0421-3.7a 16 3-121-0 U,9 s awtXPe Charl,as W Grover,, Dr4A 13 Hirt, Samuel C 17011 Neaquist in 5311 El D=ado Dr. 8750 Shannon River Cir mintingtm B662111 Cif 92649 Mintington Bone,, CA 92649 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 163-046-02 thru 08a dot W-042-18 thxuu 26e 163-121-10a 163-042-So • &=t2exn 0iliforia Ea-IM9 Z Crutkahank, Wm A Jr et. al ' Rabe, Nalan is bean Dian 8383 WilAhire Blvd 170.0 l�quist Ln 9100 Wil&' rd Blvd suite 1040 amt4qum Basch, CA 92649 Deverly 1ti218, CA 90212 Bover'ly fit t3 w, CA 9()713. 163-042-gs 16 3-0 4 6-Ole 16 3-121-11a • ty , Robext R 10ta, Hisa et al Gom2xirg, Harvey I; 17 ri Noequist Iat 5242 Warner Ave. 6050 Wagner Ave. I g;� , Ch 92649 Huntington Reach, CA 92649 Huntington neachf CA 92647 1 42-7e 163-121-019 163-•121-15a Leorstr4, rarsiis D Douglaa Stations Inc Seeds, Itugh of Al 17 km quidt In P 0 Box 2500 16931 Bolaa Chica 5t Beach, CA 92649 Caata Diem, CA 92626 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 1 Bs 163•-121-02a 1�63-•121-16a 1, NUUm T Jr Ituehne, Lester W . Seeds, Hugh 170811k%nLdnt Lr. 17032 Bolus CI•iica 5142 Warner Ave. bwCh, 0% 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 `d6 qq 163-121•-03a 163--121-18e I 6, A WA A Deam, Richard M Kaehiekas, George at al 17 A t rn Elmo D L 15604 Gaymon* Dr WaUnOM Bsachr CA 92649 5271 Be!1. Ave La Mirada, CA 90683 Huritingt:..n Bench, CA 92549 163-121-04s awald F , Rule, Richard R at al 353-1..1••19s 17 t-, � 5075 Warner �►�*e. Suite C Buccelln, Grai�Y.lin J etal 6 1966 Rhodaa D:. bM Bsdt, Ch92649 Huntington beach, CA 92649 Costa Mean, CA 92626 I � 1 y 3-042 Us 163-121-05s o►.itt, ,� D % Ferrara, Kennoth J St Onge, Ha Mums 1?lll � 4126 Mnnja Ct St: Dn9o, Mazgeret E axting�B�? M 92649 Las Vegas, Nev89104 , 24001 Muislands Blvd Space 363 81 Tara, CA 97530 4 163-0U-156 163-121-06s 16 3-121-`1 s i° Qmk, DrfJ 1 T Szabo, Esther F Tit Tokaruk, John D 5332 12 Diller Dr 1105 Burlinghall Dr P.O. Sox 1657 MntUgtcn paw, Ch 92649 Long Beach, CA 90807 Huntington Deach, CA 92647 • 163-042"16s 163-121-07e 163-121-22s BM*Wd, KW% 14 Downs, Stephen Ir Espinoza, Roilolfo 53.21 El. Dorado St 5092 Warne= Ave 5121 Dunbar Ave Una-4 WT " w•+.e,+r., rs 00)44n Hunt i"ae -nr A-rah. CA 476AQ �• ... ,.���� r11 OMMITIC04L P.XG7MCN 70-5G i Octnber 19, 1976 930-50-021s, 228 930-50-032a 930-50-042a Kirklsn, Ctarles A Jr R. bwn, Vern L et ail Hielmn, Radl.a D 5351 Otwlatd Or. 16871 Canyon In 16961 Canyon In amtingtvn Buc ho Cal 92649 lkmtincjtrn Bwrh.. CA 92649 Tbmtlrwjtm Dwch, CA 92649 1 930-50-023o 930-�0-033s 930-50-0433 `Landg:mfp fkvd L S Lao, tiir-k C Ro xxta, Willitsa T 533). overlatr4 Dr 16075 Carycm Ln 1697Y. Ca ryon Ut fAmtbgtcn ftwir, CA 92649 Ihmtingtco 13sac 1, CA T2649 iitmt t1y:1b�m onwh, CA 92649 930-50-024s 930-50-034a 930-5D-044s , Pixtwxtl C Paynu, Ri&ard N Carlatnn, Betty J et Al '5 1 verle d Dr 16881 Catrytarl In 16981 Carryon In ngean 8eechCA 92649 Itmtingtxm Beach, CA 92649 Muntington Desch, CA 92649 y 0.0259 93th50-035rs 930-50-0459 ng,Ya I3arold :fight hold, RMgwW H *4bebar, Ruthr✓ E t 5 gland Dr 16691 Cavm in 16972 Canyon In Imb ton Dmdi, CA 92C49 Llmtingtm Doak, ca 92649 l.u-ztingbon Doach, CA 92649 9 026s 93D-50-036s 930-50-046n Dine 1; Ranson, Harlan EC at: a1 (b�hnLt:h, Mart in R 5311 Overland Dr 16901 C'mrjm Ln 763 center St TMich, Ch 99649 mxtltwm D►wcp, CA 92G49 El Sagumo, CA 92245 1s 930-50-037s 930-50�-047a S 3tvntx, Mary W �Mrs; DIAll I Jams C azd Dr. 16911 Cat Ir 16952 Canyon In i Ihnub2 an Fine , CA92649 Mmtingtxn B3wh, M 92649 Ihnitirgton Ilaatfi, CA 92649 9 so 00-50-030a 930• 0-048s LM , Neftm C Du CXtt3ttxds, ir'ztma" R Nela m, ondl s W am bud or. 36921 Cams: In + 16942 Cm ma In awho CR 92649 Ittit eatgton DEACh, CA 92649 Hmtirgtm Bch, CA 92649 93o-•50-0399 + 930-=)-029 ` Ch=miaar Randmu P 930.50-049s Popp Visglnia V 16931 CaaVon In t73,c3zm, EbRTd W 16851 C"m In mmt:ingbw DDaxh, Ch 92649 U932 canyon In MmUrat ca amch, Cx 92649 mwtincrtai Beach, CA 926 49 930-50-040s 930-50-0301s IlaMasbont W Saot-t 930-50-050a Ni].um, xdsryrl E 17270 Iuttm*wd St % Arnold, Harold J IM51 CwFM in Fountain Vallejo CA 92708 16912 C mrym In tsmtincJ m Desch, CA 92649 mvwingtm oomah, CA 92649 930--%-04ls 930-50-03Ls Roman, HaVaret A 930-50.051a Chins, ti mar" 16951 Canyon In Mlvin, Faye C et et 16065 cwrt i 3n BfZ*4rrgton tech, CA 92649 16902 Canyon In Hunt'imill BMW+ 0vmf-4*4rMn Milt-l- f'8. Q7649 COEVITZCWJ, 10MMclY 70-50 Octobar 19, 1976 930-5f1-052a 930-50-062a 93D-50-072s lku*, Gearge B t• wine, J Kuecnnr�, Fietrleldla�e J gsi'�Y 16892 Oarcn In ` CIAnc'Y, IarnadLna 5451 Borartza Dr HuntLi5b ri Ilar+cli, C1 92649 5331 Do ►ts= Dr ltutn mbon Du;nh, CA92M limtingtant Beach, Ch 92649 930-50-053u , 930-50-063a 9303-50�-073s Bela@, DOXTiu H et Al' nt 5341aDc J= C . Dmm, Charlesta B 16862 Cart�ym In Ihr�ti» Bwch, CA 92649 5461 Immiza or I4uatin3t Ln Dwch, CA 92649 Ittmtimjtm Dosch, CA 92G4, 93t1-5Q-OS4R 930-,0-064a 930-50-074a Patteram, Cary W Dierlein, lam J w D 5351 rowr►za Or 5462 Wruvaa or 16 r In Itcntiriginn Dmcho C1 92649 j IAn Wwhr CA 92649 Fltaitingtnsl &' It, CA 72(�19 930-50-065n F 93D •055s Iltrtchimm.s Clirtnn R 930�--50-0759 Itwt . Bother 0 et al 5361 Bonanza Der Winelaw, Qxir.V--3 C 532 land Dr InxttizYq= Macho. CA92649 5452 Flanmiza rAr :9 ; 6�t, C1 920649 Thr;t.,irsjt On Dcaah, J192649 930^5C-066a 930-50-076s 0--:i8 Umd, Ham-A Jaws C Jr �5391 F za Dr � �r Q�las E 7805 Bmtcn 8t SE lbmt:ingb nt Dwch, C1 92649 59y. Bo!�,1xa Dr Itt �,, � 35602 Ifunt.i.',vton WAc;t, CA92649 0' 9 0-057a 93t?-SD-067+a 930-50-0779 Hari 0 •D�m, Haun a P1�,Walter A 537 Dr 5391 Omar= Dr � 5432 ;Zvira Dr IAmUnstm W tch, C A 92649 Rnting"i Baa�ch, Cl 92649 Itmtimjbm Iloac], CA 92649 93 0a8s 930�-50^068a 930-50-078s � �► � a 5411. W4u� Lost ci Vet Affairn St of Ch MmtAxigt m Daach, CA 92649 Dr 3Ii tx�rmu, IE�'artk 2r I9►n Beec.�t, CA 92649 5422 B�r.nta Or TAntimban Mach, CA 92649 930-a0-OS9a 930-50-069s 930-50-079rs Aittiatt R • Leaf he• nn�rt H C aae, P`ratx�es L Dasla�t, 5352 B Adrian n 5421 Ba = Dr � 5412 Bcuta vl Dr FAntingtxm Beach, CA 92649 ItmLUVim Do , CA 92649 �Inm ;h, CA 92649 d 930-50-uMs • 9Bet of Vert Aiefa4 St of CA Field -080s i Over oltx, Rmcia A Jr . Josh D Jx c S342 Bm m Or 5431 5421 Diennexi Dr ��Dawn,a DEC 4? w j Imt3ngtw Beach, Ch 92649 MrnjgtcnWadi, Ch 92649 lltrntingtan Dutch, CA 92649 y 930-5D-061s 930-50-�081s 930-50.07Lts ClwdAs, R x j -3�Donc = Dr � Pall, Ja& E 5431 Riemani Dr Ir M••M1.y.+nr. run.,.+s� .•+► n+r�n 54CI.Bcnm= tw Thmtfroty" Awxrh. mgU49 I r oa+DrrIMAL E937TIM 70-50 amboLnw 101 1976 146-232.02r 146-231.12a 146-232-22s Nub III', Moak BartDlla, Josap2dM . SaNuiso 1013 ieu F P0Bw1561 � 3151 Btallicst Jhr 5151 Pears: Or 29►s'itirwlc w 3mach, CA 92649 %X inj= W ach, CA 92649 IkvitL gtm Beach, V. 92649 146-232-13s 14b-732-03s 146-232-23s ' Ou"tr Mtn R TYIer, J91MM F; Gastafam, Jot',&i 5161 Otal i Cir 5161 Celdinc3 Car 5161 Pearco Dr Amtington boach, M02649 Vimtin3tnn Da4c:h, Ch 92649 Ikmt4)gtan Dsech, CA 92649 14 �32-04s 14P kic 2-14m tt J 146-232-24s 25s E � 5171 Gel Cir Nr�rio, Art M Tiff- 1 Cir Aittg 7795 U-stminster Ave i Heat, Cal 92649 D3a*Jngtm ecsach, M 92649 heatminster, CA 92683 0a"e 146-232-1x3 146-231-0l ^=or yAIXY a Darnall, Mlim D tkuuie, Jaat C 51B '.11aa Cir ' D1m51B1 G`' eat. 92649 fie, Jackson S aw5d-,, 01 92649 � 0 1360 If. 6!h St Sui.tr_ 220 Slut Pc dco, M 90732 1 14Cr•232-M 146-23190fs rrstl.a A nm=, Ralph F Gons3alwo. FAther M .r.W ObRI . m Cir 5102 Geldir.9 C' " 16503 Eblsa Chica St ULU Bwdi, (M 92649 mutingtm swell, CA 92649 Ibmtingbon R'%ch, Ch 92649 s 10-232-179 146--231-03s VT179t Twtzy J mil, Flilli= D Ctmsu, Art2m`r H W% Cir ' 5172 GgULixJ Mr 5061 Poum St. iimtit gI m Dwhe CA 93649 *ton Boach, CA 92649 MvIL nrl M Beach, CA 92649 Uum ]A6-232-Us 146-35"2z 03 04 Charlsr h slater, iF1'JAM A er al Dorris, FObert: 5'I i Lon Or 5162 0&2db* Cir 2169 E ocean Blvd Bssc hi CR 92649 ftttigcn Notch. CA 92649 FAIba, CA 92661 W-232'-09s 146-32-19m 146-351-05s Itswratim )am' g obaal�ian Cir ' �Z Mdding Cir 45 Fla-f�ic Ave Ifttim"m Boach, CA 92649 ffmtiMtrni baw:h, Ca 92649 S a1 Beach CA 90740 146-232-10s 146r232-2ft 146••351-06o • Du*wwth, Mold Bell F rcb=t It SLO staniion r- 5142 GoIdIM Clr 144 sr h St Bat , CR 92649 Bmtkqbm Mach CZ 92649 Gloats Mem, M 92627 7 i i5;A; 146-232-21r a 0 C�c, Osv1d C albftme s TjmOt'hy GAC�ceui, Jerxy fl et aI 1 cir 5141 Pears" Dr Goo&m r wiLli m A 0 AGk Cmditicrial Maoat,,tton 7050 OC 16, 197E L46-IU-Olx b 146-201-14a *W1001 xGlchi et a1 146r201••la Grah ma, Cal"d A et al 7795 MuMdusbor Ava City Of tfntingt m Bondi Pfca d, Raynand C mber, Ch 92683 LN 5452 Old Pirate In llwtirtigWn 9wrh, CA 92649 146-211.-02s 146-201 03e: 146-201-Ills Oacixf the Fresiding H.iWW TN=gwon, Earl TI lbeerablat.-t, StmiW Of thO Of L.a" CtuUt 16671 Graham 5t M07 Graham 9t oc IDO Ra:titxjtan Daach, CM 92649 Mmtirgtmj CA 42649 Final ustatte Gapt. 10 e. awn Salt Lwr City, Utah 04101 146-201-04a 146-201--17a Wal tar, Clarencs Son, Willim K IWO! Crahm St 45319 E. F3r-ida Pn mntingtm each, Ch 92649 Hewmt, CA 92343 L u-034 146-201-06s 146-201-18a ucebme aviA H at al Pmrj=d, H*mt D Picard, Rarjr"A . �>aurd MI Old F Ants In 5152 Ol.d Pirate Yn N. Ave LAz tttac=bm I3aaC+t, CA 92649 amtingten lmwh, CA 9264:" angtan Bosch, CA 92697 -� 2*5-201 07n 14G-201-20a ftxft L , B C rhaffnere, #.V rlss R el: al 176H Cmwom 3441 Old Pirate Ian 5405 Old RL'hhc In Pooh, Ch 92647 Rmtirr ban Dew, CA 92649 mmtimton wad), CA 93f ;9 .�ll'06" 146-7011 OFls 146-201.2Ls 01 DRvId , Ima�,y A Dept of Vats AEfirs of State tirdwo !fit h431 EOM Pirate In of Catllf aria Atnt3Domichl CA 92649 P�&Ongotn Bmdi, Ch 92649 Martin, r 09W C 3372 03.41 Pete Ltl mmtinyCm Hee&, CA 92649 1-07e . 146 Sal L Tiekhomt, Ua IM N S. "t at:. Apt 16 5US CQA PIrEto In 403mbo CA 9M02 Smitingbm Deadl, CA 92649 146-2U-09r 146"M-10s 145-201-22s 8ba1lme , Podb rt L H+►T,, Ax'ibm C Jr. RiAft, Ralph D I&= Gaboa Sta. 2656 Chia+ Av4 5362 02d Pirate Lai UasUs>g W Mach, CA 92649 Boo1 Mmo-er CA 9L'733 AtiItire3tan Beach, CA 92649 146-211-1Oms of 10LAIn 146-201-23a 24 ba.l vm lv mamb tlaar, kalm Min aar, 3amr P 166M arabaa etr SM. Old Pirate La 3.6705 Grahm St. H�sttir0 M VMch, CA 92649 Domtington Beach, CA 92649 Rmtingbm Borah, CA 92649 146-211-no w I '- n, 8ta ploy y st al. 502'Oman An COMMUNAL EM3WrtCH 71 50 Oob 1-c- U, 1976 1i6-05S�L 146-055-11m 146r054-14a 6dt'h, NiwId J ti;rdr Alkw tt H Le May , Lat rwwe SM CaUmts PC. 5341 Heil Ave 16412 Smite wits Ln a a � Dench, CA 92649 Mmt.init m &+wisp CA 92649 Hntingtm Beach, CA 92649 1WO55-2r 14&-055-12a 146-054-156 AtartSts, Jawsa D Nil0$, Huy L Szekeresh, RAmrt J 5352 Calianbe Dr. 5361 Heil Aim 16401 Santa Mites Ln Hutbvtoa Besch, CA 92649 Mmtingtan I3uch, CA 92647 IhmUngtm Haab, CA 92649 146-M-39 146-056-0 .. 146-053-129 83�,'9c I Lu d+d M. D=m, Lloyd A Logic, Zhwu D SM Caalinsim Dr. 52A2 CaLianba Dr 16401 Arlirm3tan Ln Hm ingbgn Deacho Ch 92649 Umtisgtm bu=h, CA 92647 Iiwit irgton Da3cb, CA 146r065-4a 146-056-02s 146-053-13s PaUswl, art F Cm Kelvin P=d, Sterling W 5332 C*UmnU Dr. 5272 Caliento, 16411 Arlingtm In lkmtirsgtm Dnch, CA 92649 IUrrJ- mgtxn Eawh, CA 92649 Bmt irjtcn D= i, CR. 97,j r� lwo5s-056 146-056-03s 146-053-14s l Tifte Arthur KUxWntmr Cw". t! zartexr Ridia rd C 5M.2 Cltliantm Dr. 5252 Cal.ianto Dr. 16412 Duel Mar In Mutfratms eewh, to 92649 k ttl. tmn 1leach, CA 92649 thmU gtan F*ach, CA Sfl6 10 146-O .1416-056-04a 156-053-15s "Y1bm, Zola L T&battmf Boy N Millar, BtanW A 5302 catiente Lr. 5251 rail P.m. 16402 Dot Ilmxl rn Iim ti gtoer M2d , M 92649 Huntington H+sadti, CA 92649 lhmdrgtm Daach, CA wa9 14 Tie 146-056�-OSo «tl6 US�Z-13s JMW, AU= K -]a=, Das L Kt1ns, Ovules K 5m NOU Am. SM Heil Ave 1,6402 Arlingbon In Hmlawlbati Ar►Khp CA 92649 HVtingbm 8aadho CA 92649 amtirrton Beach, CA 92649 3�6-A5�5-06s 1�6-Gs6-06[a 146-052-14e licssr 41mar, Dam N Schatt, Vandy T Xoth, Fyrai G 53U HAL Avg 52.81 Hail Ave 16412 Arli.ngbori Ln IlM*Afotcn Dewh, CA 92649 Ivtkydt a Ike mchr CA 92649 I6saUmjt*n tleach, CA 92649 IAG-O ,.09m 146-062-Vi , Dale F P�p.�Tmzwth H @ sin us,�d C 1 t all Ln Apt 1 Crertlins, CX 92325 16401 Del lino: in IAantwi Wm Bmtj CM 92649 Med:.b-;bnn Headh, CA 92649 146-055-1Or 146•-054-I3d 146-062-LIS Whzd, E.leine A m-cd, L9 Roy Dugm, Wallace 5341 Will Me U41.1 Dal Ma In 16412 Hollp w i In : oanditional &x=pticn 70-50 Octnbw 19, 1976 146351••089 146-•241-14u 146-241-38a 4 Eh •, to Drrty LAW, Jan Dreuaz%-Iiarrism Inc 4 P liml o Dr 16815 Iaoosemit: lid • Mvuar, C J R�llir� fiil]m Est, CA 90274 Huttsngban Ilaa►ch, C► 92649 1750 Indorn Vboa f!tttlr rban, Ch 9 63? 146-351--09A 146r241-39s 40 44 146-241-15a Nicoolaid ", John N EVE=, "Toneph P Crcesley, SIA PIOTM, Burton K • Carriam ll.iard ' 1055 FL-w Ave 5350 Lou I�rrc'4i,,Altos Ln ti66 16005 F.X)Wmlt Rd Palm Springs, CA 92262 Yczbm 3wAr .P.m BeAch, r'A 97649 146r-351-IW 146-241-16a 146-241-41a P Hvrtan K Vinamt, Peber S 5 Alt Ch os YA Wimp I> It 4ahrd V � 16751 Roasult RdI`i't t 92686 Sun.4et 13eac2:, CA W/42 IAmUng Mac h,ch, CA 92649 14 .3a r 146-241-17s 146-241-•42e Jcamo Glen W Stith, Agnes L Ib is ay, Cliffazd iv 1717 Ylatvi#L.IF Ava . T . 17609 S. I3roscfi�+ay St CA 90740 20821 Cr+e Wiew In CAtdom, CA 90248 lmtjnjtcn D3ach, (M 92646 1A 03a 45 146-241-18a 146-24143a jam E et a1 Boller, Allert O Tecka1xTxy, Virgin M C4W►, A C 5032 Few= St 5052 Pearce St -r061 Warner Awn B&W-h, CA 92649 thvtington wsadi, ck 92649 IbmtLngtcn Bawh, CA 92647 I -080 146-241-•19a 146-241-46a ` 3bbsrt 4 at al 1+tiaLu d, L Cm rl , i L Ja dtal 5 pGam Sr. 5074 P St ' 50�75 ftm-Ir Ava Ihan uvtm Deachr Ch 92649 13mtjn_;i i E ac:h, CA 92649 B,t,_gton Bwdi, CA 92649 146-241-20e 21 146-241 47s Jewau D et al mamma Lila 09dm" irtiLUM B � 3440 A" 16771 Aooaemlt rd . 4Padio Cpez'ational Sr2rna fray , C'A 90Aik3 FAs�x�t poach, CA 92649 5075 W rner A% Rntirv#m Beach, CA 92649 146-241-33a 163-041-3s UE-241-06e • Peck Lj=1 S . Ids Batter %*mb 8 P.O. Boas 14511 17042 Na�uiat In 17171 �1 Or In" Bwdh, M 90814 IhntLxftm, Death, CA 92649 � Bad, CA 92649 14G-241-LU 146-241 34a 35 163-041-2a . ftLr�dlb a Qoa u ity WobaoC OC et .-d ftL% of Amwiaon • 0 Brim, Jdn W Balru C hica Wta r 00 Tr. fVI-01115-0 17052 Hr quiet In P 0 Bar 103 P.O. Boa 328 Itr� Hoesch CA 92649 Am"t B�oacgh, i� 90742 Sauna Ann,, LIA 9,. 02 146-241-]3a 146-241-36s 163-041-39 • Nadal Hamm at al ftLIas, Ste+lla M • !Warla nd, Charlm D 7795 ANe 5064 Pea va St 17022 Newquist Ln W., tmir~ CA 92683 ftMUIgtan &%mch, CA 92649 �nM1wt , Fi&A^h. rr Q'7FAQ • • oataciLdnnnl sa m tim 7050 Ocbd3w 18, 1975 i46-062-14v 146-062-2/� 146•-063-15a 11�3r .Tam A covilm" Chu-lam B L6W HaUywwd Ln Waft, Tts=w G 16402 Bay; Bove In U*i-wban Bn4cb, Ch 92649 5391 Eieil Ave Htmtbgtcn Bends, Ch 92649 8onU gtan Bond%, Ch 91649 146-062-16a 146-062-25e 146-064-12e 414=0 winim N qgndlarg, Albert F 5101 Heil Ave W�j �'°1'd' is 5i62 C41 Dr 16401 Baysh=v Ln Beech, qR 92649 IAndxigton Doak, Ch 92649 nimtIngton Dmch ok 92649 1 16C 14;'r062-26n 146-064-13s Actm J YACCJUM, Donald G Drmrt xt, Jme9 H Dr 54U Hnil Ave 16411 Baydmm W Batch, C2► 92649 Dx*lrgtzm Bwch, C k 92649 Fiuntim3tcn Mwh, CA 92649 346-062-3.7s 146-062-27s 146-043-24s N aXd W Wang, Vozw BowzIl u, Colia C Dr. 5421 Rail Avo 19731 H=on7o St Bmzh, CA 92649 JAUltingtm Witi, CM 92649 Fcxmtain Valley, Ch 92708 I" . 246-•062-20e 146-03-75n C1ask=, WIN" B F'�+ D ratbaeam► witu m J OLUAda Dr, 5431 BdI hw 164U Santayu Ln Besc�hh, CA 92649 "WtLU: = , CA 92649 MmLbyjton Beech, CA 92649 19� 14tti-t}f -29s 146-043-26s r ice, E L C1t].ls�tx� Br. Sol Ron Ave 10082 G rfield Avo Isatitutco Imo, CA 92649 Hmt•.isgt cn Beach,, Ch 92649 Ibx*irvjt= DpAch, Ch 92646 I 20r 2 44;-'0+�2-30s 146-00-27e AWtIn y Xbfin. Othro<-d H Zle�snotvc, Michael L 54ft ibi.1 Ave 5142 CS1.iants Dr CA H r � 92649 a E;4 tom zch, C h 92649 Hmtingtnn Beach, CA 92646 34i^fi63-12a ]4i-06�2- Ricks, Fer=th R 146-043-28s I wAt.,s, I *IA if 1M HoUyrood In ;met "nMM s 53% CALt ntir Dr. Rmtin#M Bewh, Ch 92649 5691 Spa Dr 14batis�q�oci HwMo CR 92649 Pion rsc�ton Er�acn, CA 92649 U*-061-22s 146-063-13o 146-043-299 Romer C C a� O+lt�od►�t3, Clifford S sw Gluemb a De. U411 adlywood in SIR Calient a Dr Mwtiagb n Bmicfi, Al 92649 q'boin Bdnch, CA 92609 13ci ungtxm Bewhr Ch 07649 063-14n 146-00-33a 145-043-30e Hich*70 Fidbu t: B 8RI14m1, James m u==, Ntchael h � 5381 1 Ave 1441.2 Beyehoae In 5142 Cay ionte Dr ��,..�<.,.,,...., b...•a, .+� �,�.� . Ch 92649 Ettntinatm Desch, CA 92649 i C014DITIONAL EXCEPTION Oct�obe 19, 1976 163-121-•238 93050-0030 930-50-011s T+W31ey, Lazy L at al bran, iL s J Mid3m3h, Milers S r►a 600 14U- or. 5441 Overland Dr. Soa1 torch, Chi 90740 lfmtingtran Bosch, CA 92649 ftnntinibon Beach, CA 92649 163-121•-24a 930-50-002s 930-50-012n San&&@, M1114 C • WbOd, David R 'Hayes"s, Jdm C 2236 B. Brom&gy 16072 Coach Ln 5435 Overland Dr. L"V beach, C11 90002 lfmUmitm Beach, CA 92649 MmUngton &-tech, CA 92649 163-121-25m 930-50-003a 930-50-0139 , Mm D Rw3And, James A at al I Elliott, 1'.chwer a J 165 in 16062 Coach Ln 543L Overland Dr 1�tsI1 txx7 tine, CA 92649 fftyntinc3ton Duch, CA 92649 Ifuntrix gbM Soach, CA 92649 163- -26s 930-50•-004a 930-50-014a Sakin, KLdael of al jwla=, Inota M Alonzo, Glcria L et &l ffl*, 217�s tip•. �Mans h, I.eotn 2M ' lg , u�J (�it�h�t n, f��.'tin , CA 90740 16352 Coach Ln 763 Centx3r St Dmtirx3txn Flitch, CA 92649 M Segundo, CA 90245 93D-5D-005a 903-50-015s urles r Dept of V©te AEEasra St of CA timm* Carl if 5051 Dunbar Avis ' Purdy, Barry D 10568 Chinook Ave Fatah Burch, CA 92649 5471 Overland Dr ftmtasin Valley, CA 92708 Mmtirrgtt m BE&Oj, CA 92649 1 -Me 830-50-006s 930-50-016s 8Ia , Moron B 1. M=Wcad, Maycxries M Albin, David S 5 1uts r Am 5465 Ov=1anl Ur 5401 OVrzhrxl Dr tAnt4ng1m Been, (A 92649 Smtington Beach, CA 92649 ffwnUYxjt:on DetLoh, CA 92649 163- -29s 930^50-007a , 930-50-017a 1 PMI 11 11mm, Mar jariea V et a7. CcanU. Robert L 5421 • AV® 5461 Ovtsl nd Dr. 5391 Overland Dr Bach, CA 92649 H x*1n9t= Beach, Ch 92649 fiuntingt on Mach, CA 92649 I W-M-304 930-50-008a 930-50.018s Mr, RWAM S ` Berl r, 13=lsm T 17042 eoasa 04m 5455 0mland Dr. Nelsen, Carlyle 1t M=Un"m Mach, CA 92649 Huntiri trn Beach, CA 92649 5361 Overland Dr. 1fmtlrv.Vm Bea:h, CA 92649 163-11-31sr 930-50-009a 93D-50.019a K"489 s nt Jean M Mwrtino, Mmmjwribe at al ' Gray, Lynn 17062 boIm Chico 5451 Overland nr. 5371 Overland Dr kbMUOtm Memr-h, CA 92649 Jkx*jr ,1,m Beach, CA 92649 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 163-122-41a 93o-50-010a 930-50-020s3 agh Benda et al AlCM 01 w ruin J , flawthmm o G>emxta M 931 Bales Chiea St 5445 Gverland Dr 5361 overla4ui Dz !. )hint-4 "wrr W.w-V. rM 010:40 C% q90;/0 . — r.--... ..r n•.fRn WIDITUM L=TI N 70-50 Oc tob_r 19, 1976 930-50-082s 930•-P•-100s Vice, DMVLW P 93D-50-09�8 • bong, Tim T 5441 1t3•mmd Dar 16931 .Pad Pcck Cir Fi ztirgtcn BrAdh, CA 92649 S%xw;cxfiGId, Willim F limit=irntm fbmrh. Ch 92649 16931 Agate Cir • O Is Pittso Charles E Ittmtirvtrn Dmch Wintcra, F3arbara M 5451 DimuA Dr 16941 Rcd Ibck Cir IAntingtm iifld►%' CA, 92649 IluazGimLzn Desch, CA 92649 93D•-50-092a 930-rrik.084e 8tmmtfieldf W1 Z t Inn F• 930-50402e MUTM G 16931 Agate Cir lta=vp Pdxrt W 15 1 st Iom St IAmtbytm Ik--ach, CA 92649 16951 ltvl Flc=k CIC { CA 92683 I%mt -sjtm Des.ch, CA 92649 930-50-103o j 93Q 0851� 93C•-50•-0919 Empar" Huriot A .Bh==r B=Verf W Mdioo, Jo--,cph T 16961 Itc+d Iic ck 16 to Cir 16972 Red Rack Cir If=tir' b Booz.i, CA 92?649 , 1 lzwa ,h, CA 92649 Irmitip3tm Itch, CA 92649 �3� a�� 3a5a-zo4s i • R , pvmk J► 930w50-094a Maya -lp, Iki1.o C 169 Ageto Or RiOD. C'M=90 K 16971 sled lbck Cir Ukotingbm Dwah, CA 92649 16962 Had Rock Cir Iluatingtm Dnchi C h 926,19 r 1% Th.mtir+►r1 n,*,�t�, CA o�Kan I • j I t 1 1055 Rono Avenue Pslsm Springs California November 4th 1976 i i F. City Couucil 1IuntinCicu Beach California Re; Airport and adjoining Parc el o 146-241-39 146-Z41-40 1 1c►?-?.1t.1-44 Oantlomau: As it Rao a very buoy meating laot Monday night, I thought x mold put my veiwR in writing. i I I as tho ovtor of tho above parcelo and wish to st•ato that I am opponed to tho Airport. Until recently I have had a � hard time collecting rants from the eight tenanto,occuping � Caeoers Plrazaj on parcel 39 & 40. Taxco on the property have boar over V3.800 for some time. Parcel 44. io 2.76 acros adjoining tho above property (teems are 13.594) Thera boo boon IA.ttlo or no int"rent in the proporty for the 10 yoaru thmt I have owned it. Tho flight path of the Airport, Soon right over Wth of these pieces of property. Now with more heunea,apartmente and aondominiume to built in that area, I alto would like to build, and with progress continuing, tho dungora,nuicancoc and complaints are bound to multiply. Leto not ki%A oursolfc pidnoo, somotimen do fly low, are noir.Ay and dangaroua. Yes the Airport wao there first, co vas tho dairy up Boleia Chica. Now that property will be improved, will bring in more tax dollars and bo a credit to the community ' Going Weat on Warnor it in a bnauti.ful Street until you reach the AJ.rport and then it is n PEES.: i The actual bualneea of a small Airport like this one, is � teaching flying. Constant takeoffs and landings. Students j praticing flying around, Aat is fast becoming a denai%7 populated area. &W4 Donit you r0allyAthat urea would be more beautiful, if * built upon, with the type of house that Ayers is plaruiing on building? It in choice property, and would certainly bring in lots more Ux Dollara, Yous very truly Sid Crossley CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 6- 181 ' COUNCIL • ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION Oil-.IING10%$111 11 To Honorable Mayor and From Floyd G. Iielsito, City Council Nernbers City Administrator Subject (MEADOWLARK AIRPORT NOISE 37*UDY Date Noircmber 10, 1976 I (RESOLUTION N0A'3v1 ) j l� I Attached is Resoltttion No."1-3(o/ requesting the Orange County Board of :supervisors to authorize their Airport Division to perform a noise study at 14cadowlark Airport . Vic County is responsible for enforcement of noise regulations ;or airports within the County. Previous studies have indicated that no noise problem exists at Dlcadowlark Airport. Since most of the complaints at the public hearing were about noi.Se , it i:., appropriate to request the County ' to perform another study. There is no cost to the City. �. RI:CODibIENDATIOtd � I ! . Adopt Resolution No.g3(pj h Respectfully submitted, -4,i } Floyd.Floyd.4. HejLsito, City r dministyato; i I'GB:p I Attachment r I I I � I i I 1 I i l RESSOLUTION 110. 4361 A RESOLUTION OIL TIfE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFF 11UNTINGTO11 BEACH REQUEST1,NG THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO AUTHORIZE THE ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORTS DIVIS1011 TO PERFOR1.1 A STUDY TO DETERMINE WHETHER 1I0ISE CREATED 13Y THE OPERATIOU OIL MEADOWLARK AIRPORT CONS'I'I`l'UTES A NUISANCE WHEREAS, there has existed for inayiy years within ehe boundaries of the city of Huntington Beach a privately operated airport for small propeller-driven aircraft known as the Meadowlark Airport; and A public heaving was recently held on the issue of the maintenance of a public nuisance at and upon such airport because of the noisy operations of private aircraft flying into and out of such airport and the proximity of such flights to residences in the vicinity of the airport, and on certain other issues not F relevant to this resolution; and Certain statements and testimony concerning the generation of excessive noise by aircraft using the facilities of the air- field were adduced at the hearing; and The State of California has Jurlad.iction over the operation of Meadowlark Airport and has adopted certain noise regulations for airports within its jurisdiction; and Such regulations provide that the County of Orange is the appropriate enforcement agency in regard to noise regulation for airports within the County of Orange; and Certain noise abatement studies were performed at Meadowlark Airport by the County of Orange during the years 1971, 1972 and 19714, which studies resulted in determinations that no excessive noise levels were generated by oper?tions at the Meadowlark Airport during such periods, j r Z. WS3A:ahb .00" 1J01•l. THEREFORE, BE I`P RESOLVED by the City Council of the t C{ty of Huntington Beach as follows: 1. The City Council finds that it . would be relevant to issues raised and the evidence presented at the aforesaid public hearing to have an additional noise level study performed by the County of Orange at Meadowlark Airport for the purpose of ascer- taining contemporary nolai, level. conditions, and 2. The Council requests that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange cause such necessary tests to be performed and analyzed in order to study and report on current noise con- ditions at the Meadowlark Airport; and that ouch reports be made available to the City Council for the purpose of evaluating the ex- istencc of a public nuivance on the issue of excessive noise emissions at the Meadowlark Airport. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of PJovember, 1976. 1 1 /(`]21 - i Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED A5 TO FORM: City Clerk Sj�, .'its Attor y INITIATED AND APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: i Cit Y Administrator 2. I 1• • No. 4361 5'1'AT% OF CALIFORNIA ) "UUMrY 0' Og/1NCE CITY OF ifUM'ING'TON BEACH ) I, ALICIA M. WiEMNORT11, the duly elected, qualified City Clerk of the City of Huntington beach, and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of said City, do hereby certify that the wFole number of j members of the City Council of the City of 11taiHngton lieact: is seven; I that the foregoing resolution Was panned and adopted by the affirmative i vote of more than a majority of all the members of said City Council 1 at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15til day of November 1976 , by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen ,—aartl re r. Pattireon, Shgnkman.111 dQr NOES: Councilmen; rnen_ Sf.eher• ABSENT: Councilmen: Gibbs 1 I � f 1 i • City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of lfuntington beach, California t i i R I • C"lTMM FX„1'MC N 70-50 Dember 19, 1976 930-50-110r 930-50-11.Le mmngc County sanitation Mclt hie m, CWOMs L Ml.d*4, CoorW L P.O. Box 111.7.7 16922 Ruby Cir 16971 Ru:ly Cir Fountain. Valley, CA 92708 Ilnt:ittgbon Beach, M 92649 13unting on beach, Ch 92649 930-50-11L 930-5(-117ts 0rwW Cavity Flood District: GaIdir, Ruth M gotta, Dulaw F' P.O. Saar 1070 16921 Ruby Cir 1G922 Couch Ln Senta Ana, CA 97.7n2 HmLUVt on Hearh, C h 92649 Wnt:irr;ton Beach, CA 92649 930-57-Me 930-50-1100 • m Cir y2m C Cat+ea, bOtsjus 16 r 16912 CoachIns eeMch, C h 92649 IfuriU ton 3awlt. CA 92649 9 113s 930-50-]Mx Jtdhnman, DMM1 x lrrjmh at, G90tW B L6rs br Cis 16902 Catch Ln bmi Beach CA 92649 Mintington Hee-h, CA 92649 9 Wn 930-50-120a lsintxn T Paylltt m, Ridurd R 16951 aft Cir 16892 Coach Its TMach, CA 92C�49 Huntington Mach, CA n?14,) 1150 wt of �a � ttail ltc� ors-�.'taJohn R P.O. M 4304 Tenn Annex uby Cam: Los ArrInles, aN 9nn52 lkmt.inyton M—sch, CA ^2649 Steff An3t Desiqn B Oman Vim Sdool Distxi.ct 7972 Wbrner Avg tiurtirxjton Beachp CA 92647 lbmtbigt oo WAch Union ILIgh School Dirstrict j 5201 Bolsa Aver 1luntimbm MAch, C % 92649 1 I 1 I I i I t"Iff CITY OF HUNTINOTON MINACH l - INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION �iS To Ed Felich From Jim Palin Acting Director Assistant Director SuWoct CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Date November 8, 1976 MEADOWLARK AIRPORT The City Ackninistrator, Bud Balsito, in his memo dated November 2 asked for clarification an original Conditions of Approval for Conditional Exception 70-50 - specifically Condition No. 4 "Obstruction lights on the blast fence" as well as along the northerly property line. I have reviewed the file and based upon this inve^'.igation have determined that Condition No. 4 as originally stated '�)y the Planning Commission would still be in effect. It should also be noted that the Board of Zoning Adjustments on November 18, 1970, reviewed said conditions of approval and pursuant to Condition No. 4 placed additional restrictions upon the operation which have never been repealed or overruled by either � the Planning Commission or the City Council in any subsequent action. The Planning Commission did revoke C.E. 70-50 on December 15, 1970. However, that action was appealed to the City Council and heard by that body oa Januarr 4, 1971, at which time they overruled the decision of the Planning Commission and approved C.E. 70-50 with the conditions as imposed by the Planning Cotmmission together with additional conditions. In summation, let me again state that my investigation would indicate that Condition No. 4 of the original conditions is still in effect. 3WPsdf Att e Wb AP i 4 I f � I ,�F•t�,t a� MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I4ovetabcr 2:., 1976 IN RE: AUTHORIZE CONTRACT DhNGEROUS DRUG ANAL13ES DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBATION DEPARTMENT PHARM CNE14 LABS, INC. On motifs: of Supervisor Riley, duly seconded and unanimously carried by Board members present, the County Purchasing Agent or his designee is authorized to contract with Pharm Chem Labs, Inc. , for a period of one year, for dangerous drug analyses at an annual, estimated cost of $95, 000. 00 for the Department of Mental Health and the Probation Department; to make adjuatments in the contract as deemed necessary, not to exceed 5%, without further Board action and to extend the contract one additional year provided terms, conditions, and unit cost remain the seine, as recommended by the Assistant Director, GSA, Support Services, in hie letter dated November 12, 1976. IN RE: REQUEST FOR ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORTS DIVISION TO PERFORM STUDY MEADOWLARK AIRPORT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH On taorion of Supervisor S:;hmit, duly seconded and unanimously carried ry Board members present, Resolution No. 4361 adopted November 15 1976, by the City Ccuncil of the City of Huntington Beach requesting the Orange County Board of Supervisors to authorize the Orange County Airports Division to perform a study to determine who-ther noise created by the operation of Meadowlark Airport constitutes a nuisance, is ordered referred to the GSA to confer with the Orange County Health Department, and to negotiate with the City as to the costs, and to report back to the Board of Supervisors as to capabilities, costs , etc. IN RE: SELECT ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING FIRM PROPOSED CONVERSION OF FEATHERLY PARK DAY 'PE AREA TO CAMPING; DAN R011LAND AND ASSOCIATES On motion of Supervisor Clark, duly seconded and unanimously carried by Board members prevent, the firm of Dan Rowland and ssccia_c is selected as the architectural/engineering fir,p for the proposed r_or.- version of Featherly lark dray use area to camping. and the Director, -EbA. is authorized to prepare the necessary contract. 1 t •