Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Conditional Exceptions - 1981-1982-1983 - 83-06, 82-39, 81-5
lye. , ' AWM+o !tea to PuMob Advw-loo rrwnts of w M pubes 1 notim by D"rw of the Gu"r or Court or Orwip County, C41ttDrnfn• Nurnbrr A-62 4, doled 219 Soptwnbir, 1901• ornd A-24831,dQM 1! Jww, 111063. STATE OF CALIFORNIA O;ounty of Orange nrVA05 4*WW #.'04 we " N,Y 00"W 1 1t so Y1 7 ppYM Wft "MCi oa*.vw mom I am a Citlten of the United Stags and a residont of the County hfwasaid; I am over the sge of eighteen years, and not a party 10 or interested in the below � entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT, with which is cornbit%d -the NEWS-PRESS, a ri"npaper ,it general circulation, printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, State of u 9lifornis, and that a Notice of Public hea<rino— «,r,_A151MIT. T 1PT.AMMTMr: r 'LI'L�+i7. S�CSN CITY Q1` t:UNTINGTON BEACH _ T of which copy at' ched hereto Ir. a true and complete copy, was printed and published in the Casts Mesa, o Nswpwt Ektaeh, Huntington Mach, Fountain Vaxllay, Irvine, the South Coast communitlis and Laguna Beach issues of *aid newopeper for - _o o - � it1n7NiliM iseuV.10 Of rr tnirirolie•' c:t^her ? ___..____�___�_ , 198—_... 3 r I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the forgoing is true and el ract. Executed an 00tabe r 27 , 198 _ 3 et eta MW, California. . Si�ittue /;o a 4- MOF CW PUM w+ - li'l'ro, A ram-• .� IN Thl Superior Court STATE OF C.411TORNIA 11171f to and for the County of orange CITY OF HUNTINGM BEACHt CITY CLERK 2 .�..r�... PBQOF QE 1'�,jBLiC PUBLIC HEARING L2054 State of Califon � Caeoty of 0re� �'a Rita J. Richter Tbat I am and at All timed herein mentlooed was a citizen of this Udted States,over the age of twenty-one yew,and that I am not.a party to,nor tutereated Ga the above entitled mattat; I that I am the principal clerh of Nn printer of the HUNTINGTON BEACH LNDM REVIEW a nswepepar of general circulation,published In the City of HUNTINGTON BEACH County of Orange and which ndwllpaper it published for the diiserah atlon of I"»awe and intaliigena of a general cha es- ter, sad which nnapapar at all timas herein mentioned had and 40 has a Was flde subscription 1st of paying subscribers, and w" newspaper liar been established, prizrW and pub- llsbad st regfular interwM In the said County of(hanpe for a period o wseding one year; that the notice, of which the a is a printed eoplr, he beer. published In the regular sad salt»iasnsa of mW wwspaper,and nut in any supplement thee*A va the tob"Ing dates,to*W MOVEMW 109 1993 I awft(a► dedase) wWw peaskl of pisrjtQy that the farego- cog Is ales aW aoezv. Dom!at...........RMCIA L A;r.O.V e•0.............. ... tiwa 83.. . ...Bita.J,..Richter— . soft ........ ... CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ZOOA MAIN STREF'i CALIFORNIA 926a8 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK i Decembnr 1 , 1983 I I III Rick Ann i gon i 16261 San Clemente Circle Huntington Deach , CA 92649 1 City Council of the City of Huntington Beath at its adjourned The i y Y 9 regular meeti+:g held Monday, November 28, 1983, approved your re- quest to withdraw the appeal which you filed relative to Tentative Tract No. 12054 and Conditional Exception No. 83-06 . If you have any questions, please contact the Department of Develop- ment Services - 536-5271 , ALICIA M. WEN'1•WORTH, CITY CLERK By: •� .� -Deputy AMW:cb cc: Jim Palin, Development Services Dept. ry 1 *rlrpHnnp '14 5:4li ti?�71 S ' T dddo CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2' W MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICIE OF THE CITY CLERK I / Noveaalber 72, 1983 Rick Annigoni 16261 San C;emente Circle Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 Due to the lateness of t;ha hour several public hearings, including your appeal relative to Tentative Tract 12054 and :onditional Exception 83-06, were opened and continued to the November 28, 1983 adjourned Council w.eting. Enclosed is aaN copy of the November 28, 1983 Council agenda, Your appeal is l i ite d under Item D-2g. 1 Alicid M. Wentworth Ci*y Clerk AMM:CB:bt • I Enc. CC: Director of Devel oµment Services . i r, , 1 ITe4pMM�:T1A ,�a1 Pew) Ifa I - lei 'J M NoveW*e 10, 1983 ,!; `��i;� Honorable Mayor and city Council City of Huntington Beach l P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 'i. Attn: City Clerk RE: Appeal i`.E 82-06/TT 12054 Agenda Item D-2g - 11/21%83 P1e43e wept this letter as nW request to withdraw the appeal to the above, scheduled for the Council Meeting of November 21 , 1983. T►m matter has been settled to the homeowners satttfaiction at this ti y y urs, Rick Anntgonl 16261 Son Clemente e Huntington Beach, CA. 92649 (213) 192-4141 ` .ram c 5ity of Huntingtoa Beaoh Alicia K. Yentva rth, cac City Clerk 2000 Xain Street Kuntingtoa Beach, as,at 92NW, lei AzI�1 of CZ 83-06 / T.T. Kap 120 Too Honorable Mayor and City Council l Speaking for the H xbour Coven Homeowners Lad the Harbour Covert Hevoowners Association as are urAnisously in favor of sub-divider S. Y. Histiball's proposal to develop single family lots. Our appeal Is prinwily against the use of Santa Barbara Lane ars the ingress- *Mob to his prc ject. Froviously, the City and the Homeowners spent time and money to limit traffic and expoBure by closing off the forth and of Santa Barbara Lane. By virtue of the fact that Santa Barbara wane is not perpendicular f at Uybraak arA Sari Clemente Circle lands itself already to blinday te. To burden Santa Barbara Lane with almost twice the amount of additional traffic would totally lefeat our previou.3 efforts. We propose the sub-divider take advantage of our presence 'by cohesively designing his protect as if we were part of his tract. By closing off the South and of Seta Barbara Jane and deolgnis:g a forma entrance through his property, traffic coup+ be routed to pas by only those homos necessary- to reach their own residences. ALUitiona2lyeL we are ooncerned that the homes to face the existing r9LV.Ldenc*s be of a like alwo and similiar in style to wdntain our valueb and a singular neighlxvThood appuwanea. Mr. Borreaarrn, engineer for the srrb-divider, has indicated a willingness to the above, but we meat a coaita nt in writing to Include elevat,ans and minima square footage referencing the late effecting our existing hones. V u I , av mom Y City of Huntington Beach Clicia M. Wentworth, one City Clark Qatober 26, 1983 paw 2 ftaLlty p in an effort to 112.11t uwWalrables and increase security we woleme the sub-divider to create a guarded gate comminity. Canal Caya sucamm grad the quality of buyers have been greatly substantiated because of the sourity and the privacy. There is as opportunity for th6 sub- divider to appreciate additional profits and concurx*ntly lower oity earvicea by smating tht above suegdati.ona. Rica Aac�igonS. 16261 San Oleo^ e 0 ale Buntingtoa Be$+ h v ., 92649 (213) 592.4141 I y 1 �r a R. j , aY I 'a i w 4''1 % Pu►�1is h 11-10-83 �..� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEX. TO PI.ANA I NG COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT N1. 12064 & COND:TONAL EXCEPTION NO. 83-06 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach , in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, j Huntington Beach, at the hour of 7�_ P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible an n�a]� � the 21st day of November , lg 83 . for the putpose of considering an appeal filed by Rick Annigoni , to the approval by the Planning Commissia� of Tentative Tract No. 12054 and Qi-aditional Exception No. 83-06 on property located south of Edinger Avenue betweei► Santa Barbara and Saybrook Lanes. A legal description is ort file in the Department of Development Services. i i i I All interested persons are invited to attand said hearing and express their opinions for or agdhst said appeal Fuw"r inforaetion Roy be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California. 82648 - (714) 536-5227 �TEO ,� CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By.- Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk .� fir- e Iq,•c'n' y. r j err t `W public la� NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING CGMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12054 b CONDITIONAL EXCEPTMA NO. 83-06 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVLN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntingtoni Beach, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on , Mpliday _ the Z!L day of 1983 . for the purpose of considering an appeal filed b � � o e P pa 9 pp Y �, to the approval by the Planning Commission of Tentative Tract No. 12054 and Conditional Exception No. 83-06 on property located south of Edinger Avenue between Santa Barbara and � Saybrook Lane. A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or agafnst said _ _ appral • further informtion may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main St+heat, Huntington Reach , California. 92648 - (714) 53C-5227 DATED---..,� � c i rY OF HUNTI NGTON 8F ACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City flare l ; • .rig JOSEP11 L. HARRISON r RAHUY STRICKI AOD tor ZISS HARTLEY / r 4022 HONTiGO CRIME ".., OU2 BMAIRS URCLE 92 BGNAIRE CIR ,LE IrL91TIN(riON BEACH, CA 9264V AUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 APO 178-622-03 ' AP#178�-622-14 AP# 178-622-17 ' HAROLD G. WEISS IAN ROLLO ERNEST E. 50UTHERLAND 4016 XnNTEGo DRIVL 16084 BGNAIRE CIRCLE 16096 BGNAIRE CIRCLE HUNTIi'•. rON BEAC'4, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HU2FTINGTON PEACH, CA 92649 AP0178-622-04 AP#178-622-15 APO 178-622-18 N01tlSAN JARVIrl � 4012 M19TEGO DRIVE CHARLES M.r' LOON WILSM Y aRACE 5302 PASATIW DRIVE16102 BGNAIRE CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BE11Ck, CA 92649 ! YORBA LINDA CA 92686 HUN76*0TON BEACH CA '92649 AP#178-622-05 AP#17H••622�-28 A..# 178-�622�-19 � ' XARTIW SCHWARTZ JOHN SI;ARL>'S ? BBTH SALE 508 R ?!AI'LE DRIVL+ 16651 WANDERER LANE i 16106 BONAIRE CIRCL9 ` A!L►RI,Y HILLS, CA 9d2Y0 IIUNTINCTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 l 's1178-6x2-O6 AP#178-621-29 AP# 170-622-20 • i COLIIGE W. SMITH t 16048 b0#�AItR CIRCLE � 1CATNR J+ HAMU JAMEIS 4�ie,RTIN HUNTIMMN REACH l CA 92649i I.535 COMMERCE LANE 16110 HONAIRE CIRCLE I IiUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ,AP0178-•622-07 AP#178-622-30 APO 178-622-21 FUC*ES ZSIBMOI D ' LAWRENCE STELLL RAYMONfi F. LOGAN P.O. BOX 58 16055 DUKINICA CIRCLE 4011 ONDINE CIRCLE WEM1NSTER, CA 9:0683 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 '"!#UNTZNGTON BEACH, CA APO 178-622-08 AI'# 178-622-31 AP#178-622-22 XONLAT STALKER iNORMA AZ2ARA JAMSB* LAIN 16050 BONAIR CIRCLE 1b051 DOMINICA CIRCLE � P.O. BOX 1937 NtWtNGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINOTON BEACH, CA 92649 ! HUNTINGTON BEACH, Q 92649 AYI1'16-627�09 AP1 178-622-32 AP 178�-622-23 1 MICH EL S. CUCIMBR i JOA1t HILBRIC[t ! L$YGfI A. ROSE 16�62 bONAIR CIRCLE 19675 SFAC'1�IP'P' LANE , P.O. lliJx 8$9 1 POIII! -622 REACH, CA 92644 i HUNTINGTO AZACH, CA 92649 PARAMOUNT CA 90723 Al'#17 •622-10 AP#179-622-33 r AP0116- 622-24 tHIL2',P N,t D8 CAltC! JOHN RARRISON i ?HILIP E. TRINDACH 16068 SONAtR CIRCLE 16412 ARDSLLPT CIRCUS ', 1612C BGNAIRE CIRCLE I=rACTOW BEACH, CA 92649 IMNTIN N BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTING BEACH, CA 92649 APO 178-•622-11 AH11S.!622-34 SAP#178-622-25 I XIC AM D. GEORCE MTCHNSTER SAY HOMEOWNERS ASSN.; MYRO DALY 16074 1i VAIRE CIRCLE Me Box 1863 16122 DWAIRE CIRCLE S MTIl16`l011 blACH, CA 92649 NUIITINGT011 BEACH, CA 92647 HMI1iC-RM BEACH, CA 92649 Of 178-622-12 i A'0178-622-35 AP#178-622-26 IiAYID C. J 0#DiBTOK t ALEXA1�1 I D. MC LEM DALN MEn�INos EEAC 16b�A Amin pCIRCI.E � 16088 dONAxRR CrRrI.6 16075N� Li11YCA CIRCL2 �AQI� CA 4264E Ht1NZ'I��I'04f 'H, CA 92649A-62E•7i�C1i, CA 92649 At#$ tic F i, 14 j mom. t el (:IitN CttuU TSAL 0 FREY J . 5'[Alll6t lK U% ' 191 SANTA BAIi9A1tA Wh1iB JACK T. -HER 1 bA91 SANTA BAtlBAtiA LANE HU"IMGTON BEACH, CA 92649 INGTON BEACH, CA 92649 . AP#178-621-09 AP# 178-621-19 . . ' � �- E.�s�-�' •'� ey WILLIAM A4HBY I.AWRENCE C. MOZAN LOUIS He SHERBY 16101 SANTA BARBARA LANE 16201 SANTA BARBARA LADE 4156 RACQUET CLUB DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUnVOTON BEACH, CAL 92649 HVNTlNGTON BEACH, CA 92649 Apt 178-621-10 APO 178-•621-20 "0178-601-63 STMLEY A. JACOB3 HARBOUR COVES CO. GENbM 6 DRECKMAN 71 PRINCETON Yak. 7072 GARFIELi AVE. 16361 WIMBLEDON LANE RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92210 HUNTINC'TON BEACHp CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 API 176-621--11 APO 178-621-21 AP#178-601-30 : J,AMES B. ST°"JDE I� HARBOUR CONES CO. ; DONALD J, LEM 16121 SANTA BARBA4RA LANE 7072 CAltO YBLD AVE. 16359 WrKSLODON LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92648 1 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 API178-621-12 " API178-621-22 APJ178-601-31 LINDA YUPPA ThERON W. MC INTOSH, JR. ERNLST B. BBNr.EL 16131 SANTA BARBARA LANE 16001 SANTA BARBARA LANE ' 16357 WIMBLEDON LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 , HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON REACH, CA 92649 AP# 178-621-13 APO 178-621-•23 AP#178-601-32 DIANE J. GALE' ; KZhAIE L. BRAFAM GEORGE BECK 16141 SANTA BARBARA LANE 16061 SURPRISE LANE 16355 WIMBLEDON LANE HUYTIHGTJKBRACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 *HUNTINGTON PEACH, CA 92649 Alf# 178-6?1-14 APO 178-62144 AP#178-601-36 FM DALEO HARBOtM-PACIFIC LTI)o FRED BERNSTEIN 16151 SANTA BARBARA LANE %MSTCHESTER BAY BOA 1 16353 WILALEDGN LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 : P.O. BOX 1863 HUNTING'ToN BEACH, CA 92.649 AP# 178-621-15 F#MINCTUN BEACH, CA 91649 ' AP#178-601-37 AP# 178-621-27 6LEANOR M. NUGEN'T ! HARBOUR PACIFIC LTD. JACK BOWW 16161 SAKrA BARBARA LANE 2WESTCHESTER BAY H 0 A 16351 VI BLEDON LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i P.O. BOX 186.3 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 APO 178-621-16 RUNTINCTON BEACH, CA 92649 AP0178-601-38 AP# 178-621-28 OWI GE H. CHUN HARBOUR PACIFIC LTD. JAMES Fo ALMELY 16171 SANTA BARBARA L03 EWBSTCH28TER BAY H 0 A 16071 SANTAA BARBARA HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 P.O. BOX 1863 HUNTINGTON $EACH, CA 92649 AP017"13-17 i HUIITINGTOA BEACH, CA 92649 AP#178-621-07 Ai'#178L621M29 JAM AfmR � a ARLES C. 1iMLER 16181 SANTA BAR ARA LANE 4032 MORT300 DRIVE 16081 SANTA BARBARA LANE Bt1N'TIIMON SSAC!!, CA 92649 [lU[ INGTON BBACHO CA 92649 HUNTIRCTON BEAC--Iv CA 92649 APO 178-62L-18 APO 778-622-01 AP1178-621-08 t4, JERAT ROPER CHOIR 2'BAx 4026 NOgi'1r= DRIVw 10691 SANTA BARVRA LANE NU..Txii'TO)l SUCH, CA 92649 11PO178-6"7-02 N I w j l r . A r I MURK'B NT WALTKR ,lANSSF"N gUARLSS DARKER 16282 WAYFARLR LANE ?'. 111116 WAYF'ERSR LANE r1q.1,46272 WAYFARER LANE - 11UNTINCTON BEACH, CA 92649 'adNTINGTON HLACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, r'.A 92649 AP0179-063-14 AP#118�-034-62 AP#178-034-73 T RRY TIFFANY COMMUNITY DISPOSAL CO. AI,EXANDER HALPERIN 10203 VALLEY VIEW sT. � 9167 LA EtOSA DRIVE HUNTINGTON WAYFARER LANE CYPRESS, CA 90630 11Utt1'I1+1G'i0d BEACH, CA 92649 AP# 178-064-02 TEMPLE CITY GA 91780 i AP9178-034-74 AP1178-034-63 f kw CHES'TER NEWNAN LESTER M. EARCUS, FAMILY TRUST I LEST& KAOH'N 16292 WAYFARER LANE 1 2� WAYFARER yE 163 FOREST HILLS LANE HUNTINGTON BEACK, CA 92649 � b 6 R 1'A" tRMINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BU.Cil CA 92649 ' Ap#178-064-d3 AP#178-034-64 . ' AP#17d�601-53 , DENNIS BERG HARRY SHEKKAN THOMAS F. BINCIES 16302 WAYFARER LANE ( 16232 tiAY1�AAEPI LANE i 4202 RACQUET CLUB DRIVE UNTINOTON BEAU.` CA 92649 } 16232 4AYYTON HLACN, CA 92�+49 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ! 178-064-04 i AP#178-034-65 AP0178-601-54 • i t EDMU14D COTTA RONALD M. ,AKYN DONALD ROESNER 16312 WAYFARER LhNE YFLRR LANE j 413E RACQUET CLUB DRIVE 1b236 WA I� HUNTINCTON BEACH, CA 92649 1 HUNTINGTON WA)N BEACH CA 4:'64p HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 AF#17d-CI64-O5 .,,PI#178-034-66 APB 178`'6p i"55 r HUNTtNGTON HARBOUR CORP. RICHARD EVANS JAMES G. HOWARD 4241 WARNER AVENUE: 4192 RACQUET CLUB DRIVE HUNTINGTON BEACIE, CA 92549 16242 WAYFARER LANE HUNTINGTON BEACIls CA 92649 vHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 AP0178-064-06 ' AP#178-034-67 AFC 178-601-56 i 1 HWXNGTON HARBOUR CORP. !EN B8M E. TOLAND 4241 WARNER AVENUE ARNOLD46 WAY DAREEt LANE 4186 RACQUET CLUB DRIVE Eta:' INGTON BEACH, CA 92649 16246 WAYFARER BEACH, CA 9264g HUHTZNGTON BEACH, CA 92669 17'l b4-07 HUNTIa#178-034-�68 Ap#179-601-57 i ROBERT HERRON WAL'"ER P'AIRFAX i ME L. A03TRONG L6L96 WAYFARER LANE 4182 RACQUET CLUB DRIVE. AUli mTON BEACH, CA 92649 16252 WAYFARER LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 926449 AP17034-58 HUNTING-TON BEACH, CA 92649 A_�#178-601. 58 AP#178-034-69 I L9$'1T2R BLANCHARD ILA VERM1 MAYS + DOUGLAS L, ELLIS 16202 WAYFARER LANE 4116 RACQUET OLUB DRIVE 11MIMTON EEACHO CA 92649 16256 WAYrZRER MNE HUNTIN=N BEACH, CA 92649 .A!#1�Q-034-59 + N1WINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 A Ar#17d-a34-7a P0178-601-59 v EZ ALC�1? HILL RESAT ttAl9�lTI' MIt:HAb`i. R. ASQU 16206 WAYF'ARBR LAWS � ER, LAMB WAY FARER 62 R 4172 1tACQUBT CLUB DRIVE EtU11T1114TON DEA4`Ro CA 92649 162!#Ufi62 WAY EAL 1, CA 92649 RE*INO"i'+0N BUrH, CA 92649 AP#178-034--60 s AP/178-034-7 f A1'/178-60 i—b�� QW= SUDDAlC1'R SWIMS tKINAS WALTER J i WJFFV i 62iZ irAYFAaalt LME 4166 ,RAL''&It CLUB DRIW. 16 WATFALUR LAt�1E MMIN+C' 11, OFAM, CA 92649 TON AE.ACH, NIENTII�IC.'TtH+f A6AC4E CA 9264g , CA 92649 At9171r-094-61 AP#178-034-72 AP178-601-61 i I I MEN" t I • ... . fit: ,w:n.. �a . . ... . . Rya Ilenr cF:tiA.i1ER r to i,A!r�r,ttit:�. , UHT�.I.11' A. GI.ASr,,c,W 4231 HUMBOLDT DRIVE �, 1041 SANTA BARBARA LANE ' '4 6281 SAYMPOOK LANE - 'IlVNTTNG'T(;N BEACH, CA 92649 dl;tr-LNGTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUN 1NGTON BEACH, CA 9264Q Ali#lis-�;11-U1 0#178••021--04 AP0178-6.1-12 SUM WVK KIM RONALD 50TWIN ROBERT STOUT 4221 HUMBOLDT DRr 219 E, BROADWAY 16291 SAYBROOK LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 LONG BEACH, CA 90602 tIUN'1'INGTOId BEACH, CA 92649 APAIyB-�611-aZ APp 178-621-b5 AFf178-611-13 _ i f MURREY SEIMER j RICHARD L. FRANDSEN Kol. NOPAN 16281 MANDALAY CIR(U 16061 SANTA BARBARA lm%NE 16211 SANTA BARBARA LANE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 1 Hu;;Tr N'GTON BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BIRCH, CA 92649 APA118-612-14 APO 178-621-06 APf 178-612-r01 ' KEITH STSWART I FRANCIS MILLER ART#'1t1R YAC03OZ7I 16281 IANDALAY CIRCLE 1,211 HUMBOLDT DRIVE 16221 SANTA BARBARA LANE 44UNTINGTON BEACH,. CA 92649 i HMINGTON BRACl1, CA 92649 i HUMINGTON BEACH, LA 92649 AP0170-612-15 AP#178-61.1-03 APPII 8-612-02 ROBERT SCIiNPIDElt I IRVINE NEWHAX I GARFIELD MISTA 16311 NANDALAY CIRCLE 16312 MANDALAY CIRCLE i :.6231 SANTA BARBARA LAMP HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 � HUNTINGTON ZEACH9 CA M49 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 AP#178-612-16 AP#17 8-611-.04 AP#178-612-03 JERRY HAYNES C.V. HELAPAY GARVIN SKAGG3 4171 HIMOLUT DRIVE 16282 MANDALAY 16k41 SAN CLEMENTE CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, C4 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 rHUNTING'TdN BEACH, CA 92649 AP0178-612-1 i API).78-611-05 APO178-612-04 i HARBOUR COVES COM2ANY KENtd1:TH N. ISAAC � WILLIAM PESCHELT 7072 CARFI.ELD ,AVE. ` 16272 MANDALAY CIRCLE 16251 SAN CLEMENTE CIRCLE HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 � HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 i HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92619 AP#17-612-18 AP#178Y-611-07 AP#178-612- t)S i HARBOUR COVES COl~d tMY BURDErrE Lb HALLETT i RICK AMNIGOWY 70'12 GARFILLD AVENUE 16251 SANTA BARBARA LANE 18552 MAC ARTHUR BLVD. 1R11NTINGT'ON BEACH, CA 72649 HUNTTNrTON BEACH, CA 92649 SUITE 440 AP#128-612-19 APO17S--611-08 IRVINE, CA j AP#178-612-06 i :ITT OF HUNTINCTOIN BEACH ROBERT MC NALLEN I ROBOERT HINOW POO. BOX 190 16255 SAPTA BARBARA 'LANE ! 16262 SAN CLEMENTE C14pl, R M IN=N BRACK, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACE9 CA 92649 !tl)h"T11'1GTON BEACH, CA 92649 APOI?8-612-20 ! AP#178-612-07 A,Y#179-611-09 i PHILI? B. LUP''SON ST PHO C. MET'r UR t GEORGE A, PE&ISON 16021 SANTA BARBARA LANE ' 15261 SANTA BARBARA LANE 16282 SAN CL.EME14TE CIRCLE hVgTrNMN BRACK, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BPACHr, Q% 92649 HUNTINGTO4 REACH, CA 92649 AP 17�-6x1-02 00178-611-1 0 AF#178-612-08 RYOMW IjMt iO ! mo HnMICK ! U-ILLIA14 imums 16031 SANTA r- ARl1 t,Al ' 16271 SAYBROOK LAIZ 16235 SANTA P.A"ARA LANE IIMInGTON 5& ., to CA 92649 HUW ING.To BEACH, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON EEACH, CA 92649 A1ri 17A—R21:�� AP!Y]8-6! 1�11 11� 11A.•6l y-�fo _ - ---__y i r 'M11CH�►At. �t�!!L 1MG6�t ,!tlRll F: �,� �l14� �� .; C twit 47 ANDROS !'I�t�1�E � 19ACHo CA 92645 O.MkWINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 741-28 AP#178 -741-39 y 08WOU RAY WILL]E FKANK BROWN 16011 CRBTE y.ANE 4191. ANDROS C't RCLE EiMI*:T(M Iftac,t, CA )2649 HUNTINGTON REACH, CA 92649 AP0176-741-29 J AP#178-74'-40 i r + f D'�IN1S BlcG3 ORIN G. F1mEt JR. 16077 C*nx LANE 4ti3 ANDROS CIRCLE SWIMCM BEACNt CA 92649 RMINGTON SFACN, CA 92649 AI'/X 78x7 1�•30 AP#178-741-41 NOEL R. KNUOSEN y'I:NG L1:E 16083 CRE► E LANE 4179 ANDROS CIRCLE NMINGTON surer - CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACHs CA 92649 Apt 178*741-31 AP#178-741-42 JAMS W. XAM { ORIN Gs BERCE 16089 wl1BTE LANE 3561 VEN':tJRL DRIVE H BZACil, CA 92649 ; HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 1►tAII -741-32 ( AP#178-741-43 I ' MARCK Kt, F. CHAN i. ROBERT L. rjowNE 16095 CRETE LANE 4167 ANDROS CIRCLE HUN TINI:tOH BEAD`!!, CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 ;w 00178 ►141-33 AP#178-741-44 i S' AMM To SUG11=0 ALFR,ED BEREST 4225 ANUR08 CIRCLE P.O. BOX 2250 MINCTON WCH,, CA 92649 SEAL $EAC'Ht CA 90740 APO 119-741-34 AP#178-741-45 momm PROUDY00T HUNTINGTON SUMIDE CORP. 421.9 mons CI1 rmt 411 MAIN- ST. SUITE B TlVG-M BEACH,; CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649 Ilw/i 7# -i4i—#S AP#178-741-46 , I t.ftIK Lq CALHOUN OCEAN VILLA SCHOOL DISTRICT ''' "r• Neft lei 4915 Al DROS ClRGL% 7972 WAMR AVE. MN"i'1 CTO BEA01, CA 92649 i 11I1N'1•tNCTON BEACH, CA 92647 � t1J J41-36 AP117&-781-01 ; A. StT1`LER I OCEM VIEW SCHOOL. DISTKICT �b A*W.,5 CtRCtx r 7912 WAWR AW, MINN I DUCH, CA 92649 1 11uNtIMGI'l?1i BEACH, CA 92647 ' 1 ''117i�5T AP4178-781M02 G� *A" ""TIN CITY OF x11mm SWR r AM S l t1'211 uu J tNHl h SAa.W AWS' CRM, LANK �' �g�7 ANDROS GIKCLII �»+� TMY 11 H BRACH$ CA 92649 •.•tH7114M.ON BEACH, CA 92649 r41-26 AP�17H-'141-•3� Cif IA BAY WILLIE FRANK SR(MN , 16071 CIRTZ !ANE 4191 ANDROS CIRCLE: HUIi`1114GTON DFAOl:, CA 92649 � HItNTINGTON BEAClio CA 92649 j AF9178-741-29 i AP#118-741-40 OWNIS StGG$ GRIN G. tltmt .m. � 16071 METE LANS 4173 ANDROS CIRCLE . HUNTINCTOM BEACHO ti:A 92649 i HUNTINGTON BRACII, CA 92649 � AP#178-741r-30 A?0178-741-41 I� j N09L R. KNUDSEN CNEUR YING LEE t6083 CRET6 LANE 4179 ANDROS CIRCLE 11MIM--TOR BEACK, .CA 92649 HtTrT'IINGMON REACH, CA 92649 AlR178•-7'41-31 ( A►P#178-741--47 I` I ' DAMES Wo KAM � ORIN G. BERGE 16089 CRIT9 LANE 3561 VENTUPE DRIVE HUNTINGTON XZACH g CA 92649 � HUNTINGTON REACH, GA 92649 0#175-741-32 0#178-741-43 MUCK K. F„ CF1At1 ROBERT L. DOWNS � 16095 CRHTE YANz 4167 ANDROS CIRCLE HUNTINGTON B"CHp CA 92649 ; HUNTINGTON REACH* CA 92649 Ar#179-741 -33 i AP11.78•-741-44 STAlrM T. SUCIMM ALFRED SEREST { 4225 AADROS CIRCLE P.O. Box 2250 MWIHGTON DEACHp CA 92649 SEAL BEACH, CA 90740 A?# 179--741-34 I AP#178-741-4 c f NONAW PROUDFOOT. HUNTINGTON SURtFSIDE CORP. 4219 ANDROS CIRCLE 411 MAIN S:C. SUITE b � tMINGWO REACHt CA 92649 HUNTINGTON REACH, CA 92649 A1t91�8- 7�►1-3�5 A,P1178-741-46 LE81v111 L. Q4LW`UY OCEAN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT T-- ti-eadeR,, 4215 ANE.WS CIRCL9 7972 WARNER AVE. WWtWGM BEACH,, CA 92649 MWI NCTON BRACH, CA 92647 Atl�177A1-36 AP#178-781-01 j � JJ JAM no sm"R OC1tA11 VIEW 5Ct100L DI9nlCr 6209 ANDA06 CIA= � 7972 WARNER AVE. . .. 11kdM11C1'M BRACH9 CA 92649 HtfMINGrTON BRA+CH, CA 92647 AZ'!17l�7'41�37 ! AP1178-781-02 L AtCmD gn'BATim CITY or ot!N'1`xtIC'1w BEACH � C oom! Lux 1p«o. WK 190 /H4Crr f 11 4 ! p1Rlt o" ALUX, CA 92649 t�177/Y. Superior Court / ! or Tws t �1*;5;1,pp: �.�tr�t fi�i►� d'C.. f,TATIr OF('A1.IFOHNIA e In and t'(►r the Counl,y of[)range aaraR.... +r+•.�w. ---- -- .-cam-.��_ v C.XTY OF HUNTINGTON Bf'ACH ! MY CXMI ' PUBLIC HEARING gtatte of C►slifornis 1 County of Orange ►as. APRIL L. ELLIOTT That 1 am and et all times herein ►petitioned was it citimn of the United State•,over the age nf twen►,y•ohe years,and that I am trot a party to. nor inta,rested in the Awpt entitled matter; that I ate►t.ho principal clone of the printer of the HUNTI NGTON BEACH I ND. REVIEW a new"per cf get►t►ral cimtlatimt,published:n the City of NWTINSTON BEACH County 0 Orange and which new- raper in published for the diaetniraition of focal news And inuiligence of a geneml charac• ter, and whi-h mwepaper at all times herein mention! hrd &W at3'.) naa a bona fide sui►acription list o. pnying sulrscrihtra, wW whi.,h newsprper has been estehlishod, prinW aad pun• b Ilehrd at reprlar intervals ire t he said County of flrnnge for a ' period aaceeding one year; that the notice, of which the annexed Is a printed copy, Imso bren published in the Wular i and entire imut of said rresrnpeper, and not iu any nupplement Ihertof,cm the rolls wing dates, to wit: OCT. 141 1982 I -taffy for deelsr0 under penalty of perjury that the fort-go- (r g is true end airrect. Dow at. .. .. .. .. .6Ai. N 8R01/E.. .... . ....... .... .. C411 amia,th ..day of ..00T. .. 1,9.�... SEltrtet•tee farm No, iP B r.. '•'off n• CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1 , • C� I i 200 MAIN STREET CAL I FOR NIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 26, 1982 James Neal , General Partner Sunset-Orange Partnership 8231 Westminster Boulevard Westminster, California 92683 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its adjourned regular meeting herd on Monday, October 26, 1982 upheld the decision of the Piaining Commission and denied your appeal relative to Conditional EAceptioio 82-39. 'This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the State of California , you have ninety clays from October 26, 1982 to apply to the courts for judicial review. Please contact the Director of Development Services if you have any questions regarding the matter. Alicia M. Wentworth City C1 erk AMW:CB:bt CC: City Attorney Gail Hutton Director of Development Services Jim Palin I y r • ra. REQU S i FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Data Octgber ..6. Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council � A Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administ•raj�d ��/" Pmp,rsd by: James W, Palin , Director of Development Services 0 SubjW: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 8 2--39 (APPEAL) Stwtement of Issue, Flawrnr»endstion, AnAytis, Funding Source, Aittrnative Actions, Attm,rnsnts: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is Conditional Exception No. 82-39 , an appeal of the Planning Conraissicn ' s denial of a request to permit a 2 ' 8" encroachment into the recptired 10 foot rear yard setback . RECOMMENDAT100; The Planning Commission and Planning staff recommend that the City Council uFhold the Board of Zoning h4Justmen4%,-s ' denial of Conditional Exception No. 82-39 with the findings outlined in the September- 8 , 1982 Planning Commission staff report, . ANALYSTS : APPELLANT : Janes Neal, General Partner � Sunset-Orange Par tr,e;7Rhip 8231 Westminster Boulevord � Westxninst.er, California 92683 APPLICANT: Same a8 above RE_ QUEST: To permit a 218" encroachment into the required 10 foot rear yard setback . 1AXATIONs The subject property is located on the south aide of Hideout Circle approximately 175 feet west of Green Street, PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON SEPTEMBER 8, 1982 : ON MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER THE PLANNING COMMISSION UPHELD THE BO"M OF S`JNING ADJUSTMENTS DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION No. 82-39 BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING 'VOTE PMZNGS rOR DENIAL: I. The auplicent can modify the design of the buildings allowing for ccnF ,L&nce with the minimum standards sot forth in the ordinance code, : f M r. 1 C.E. 82-39 (Appeal) October 6 , 1982 Page 2 2 . A oubsstantia:l hardship has not been demons,tr-aced to grant the subject roridi tional exception. 3 . The granting of Conditional Exception No . 82-39 would be grant of special privilege inconsistent with the past acticans of the Board of Zoning Adjustments . 4 . The proposed layout of the building w.)uld adversely impact the property to the rear because the 218 " encroachment would place the proposed taro-story apartment within 714" of the property line. AYES : Higgins , Paone, Winchel,l , Schumacher NOES : Livengood ABSENT: Porter, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None DISCUSSION: History. In November of :1980 the P1a,sning ConmUssion reviewed a precise plan of street alignment (No . 80-1) for :Neely Circle, Hideout Circle, and Sande Inane . Hideout Circle (the subject location) was a legal easement which could not be developed because it was too narrow to permit emergency vehicle access . In order to remedy this situation, :he City precise-planned the above mentioned streets for two specific reasons : First, to provide a minimum right-of-way that the Fire Depart- ment, Police Department, and Department of Public Works wou_•d find acceptable as an alternative solution to public streek.s for this area . The 6treets9 were designed to be 38 feet wide , which world provide two 12-font travel lanes required by the Fire Department and allow an 8-foot parking lane on one side of the street. Secondly, the City Council intended to encourage consolidation of lots throughout this area through the precise plan. "It was the consensus of the Council that if owner consolidation does not take place, the redevelopment of the area by the City would be considered. " (City Council minutes of May g , 1981 . ) Consolidation of the general area has not taken place and ownership is still fregmented . The subject property has been consolidated from five small lot¢; however, this does not comply with the Council intent . Even though dive lots have been consolidated to create this parcel, it is still substandard in siLi and further reduced in size by the required dedication resulting from Precise Plan of Street Alignment 80-1 �125 ' by 38 ' 6") . on April 7, 1982 , the Board of Zoning Adjustments approved Conditional Exception No . 82-9 , a request to permit a 318" encroachment into the front yard setback of a side entry garage on the subject property. Sub- sequent to this action by the Beard, the applicant submitted his plans for plr!►n check, where it was discovered that the proposed units encroached 209" into the required 10 foot rear yard setback . Therefore, on duly 21 , 1982, the applicant filed a conditional exception to the Board of Zoning Adjustments which was denied based upon the following reajons: I . The Applicant can modify the design of his building on the property allowing for compliance with the ordinance code. r, 4 y. C.F. 82-39 (Appeal) October 6. 1982 Page 3 2 . No hardship was de►rtonstar.-ited. 3 . The p.oposed 1.1yout of th:� building would impact the property to the rear because the 218" encroa-hmant woulA place the propoapd apartment within 7 ' 4 " from property line . 4 . It would create a apecial privilege inconsistent with past actions by the Board of. ZonJ tic Adjustments . After analyzing the Board of Zoning Adjustments denial of the su}I;ect conditional exceptJ.on , the staff concur,l with their findings . Seeauae the property is vacs-iit, there are numerous design alte-rnatives available to the applicant which would permit the. development of a duplex while complying with the minimum standards at the ordinance code . Therefure, any claim of hardship is one that is self-imposed f duce to the selection of design . Fuather, as previously stated, the Board granted the applicant a conditional exception for a front yard setback which allowed for design flexibility. The granting of yet another conditional exception -would be one of special privilege incon- sistent with the philosophu of past actions by the Board of Zoning Adjustments . ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Pursuant to Section 15105 , Class 5, of the California Environmental Quality Act, the subject reque3t is categorically exempt. FUNDING SOURCE : Not applicable . ALTERNATIVE ACTION: The City Council inay over+:urn the Planning Commission' s denial and approve Corditional Exception No. 82-39 with findings. SUPPOFiTXNG INFORMATION: 1 . Staff repast dated September 8 , 1982, with attachments 2 . Planning Comnissicn minutes dated September 8 , 1982 3 . Letter of Appeal M Tit'i Hfl 5 dJ. 4•T , r'.JI nuntington beach devaicpmant services department WAf f REPORT. jTO; Planning CommitiSiori F ')M : bevclonment Scirvi.ces DATE : September 8 , 1982 CONDMONAL EXCI.,MON NO . 82-39 (APPEAL) APPELI NNT: James Neal , Gencral Partner BATE IIPPEAL, FILED : • Sunset--Orange Partnership 8231 Westminster Blvd . August 2 , 1982 Westminster , CA 92683-3669 MANLt�TORY PRUCESSIr'IV I)A"CL : APPLICANT : Same 60 days from public hea:7 14C:QII1;;"1!: To permit, 7 2 ' 8" encroachment :fearing i.TI L0 the rC'(Ju ireci 10 roast roar 7,0NI; : R2 , Medium ()eris i ty yard s . t,back. Residential WCATION: Sub joct property is located GENERAL. PLAN , Me.di_um on the south Side of Hideout -- Circle, approximately 1.75 feet Density Resicienkial west of Green Street. EXISTING USE : ACREAGE: 11 a c * Vacant 1vO_ SUGGESTED ACTION : They Plannjng staff and Board of Zoning Adjustments recommend that the Planning Commission uphold the Board ' s denial of Conditional j Exception No . 82-39 bared on the findings outlined in Section 6. 0 of this report . 2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Conditional Exception No, 82-39 is an appeal of the Board of ,Zoning Adjustmentst denial to permit a. 218" encroachment into the required 10 food rear yard setback, A 4U48A I I r�r CE 82-39 (APPEAW Sept. 94 1982 rage 2 3 , 0 ENVIR(.,NMENTAL STATIJS : Pursuant to Section 151.05 , Class 5 Of ;:he California Environmental Quality Act, the suLiect request is categorically exempt. 4 .0 SURROUNDING LAND US13Z-3., GE EFU-.T, PL N_L.YONING : Subject Pro pe.,rty GENLMI, PLAN DE S1 GNATION - Medium DensiLy Residential Z D N I&N'5 : R2, Medium Density Residential LAND USE : Vacant North of Subject Pro2ertk.; I I GENERAL PLAN DESIGINATION: Medium Density Residential ZONING: R2 , Medium Density Residential r-AND USE: Apartments I Soutl, 'of Subject Property : GENEX%L PLAN DESIGNATION : Medium D,.-�nsity Residential ZONING: R2f Medium Density Residertial, LAND USE: Single family dwellings East of SubLect__Pr2,2erty : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Medium Density Resid6nti,-.1 ZONING : RZ , Medium Density Residential LAND' USE: Existing four-plex West of SubJect_Pro 2erty: GENERAL '_QLAN DESIGNATION: Hi h Density. hesidejjtial ZONING: CN, Community Facility Recreaticin LAND USE: Future. park-srte 5 .0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: flistoEx. in November of 1980 the Planning Commiscion reviewed a precise plan of street alignment (No. 80-1 ) for Neel,,, Circle, Hideout Circle, and Sandy Lane. Hideout Circle (the subject location) was a4egal easeanant which could not be developed because it was too narrow to permit emergency vehicle - access . In orde,.o to remedy this situation, the City precine-planned the above mentioned streets for two sFii.,,Afic reasonki ; First, to provide a minimum right-of-way that the Fire Department, Police Department, and Department of Public Works '"uld find acceptable as an alternative soluilon to public streets for this area. The streets were designed to be 38 feet wide, which would provide two 12-foot travel lanes required by the Fire Department and allow an 8-foot parking lane on one side of the street. Socondly, the City Council intemled to encourage consolidation of — r -- - - - - - - - - - - - C. E. 82-39 (Appeal ) September 8 , 1982 (,,,Page i lots throughout this area through tti, precise plan . " It was the con- sensus of the Council that if owner const:.Oidat:ion does not take pl .rce , the redevelopment of the area by the City would be considered . " (City Council minutes of May 4 , 1981 . ) Consolidation of the general area has not taken place and ownership is still. fxagmanted . The subject property has been consolidated from 5 small lots ; however, this dae a not zomply with the Council .interit . Even though five lots have been consolidated to create this parcel. , it is still sui bstandard in size anti riarther re-• dW_,ed In size. by the required dedication resul.t:ing from Precise Plan of Street Aligrvnent No . 80- 11 (125 ' x 38 ' 6" ) . 1 On April 7, 1982 , the Board of Zoning Adj us;.rnents approved Conditional Exception No . 82-9 , a request to pa.rmit a 3 ' 8 " encroactiment into the front yard set-back of a side entry garage can the subject property . Subsequent to this action by the Bcard , the applicant submitted his plans for plan check where it was discovered that the proposed units encroached 218" into the required 10 foot rear yard setback . Therefore, on July 21 , 1982, the applicant filed a conditional excep- tion to the Board of Zoning Adjustments which was denied Lased upon the following reason,. 1. The applicant can modify the design of his building on the pro- perty allowing for compliance with the Ordinance Code ,, 2. No hardship was demonstrated . 3 . The proposed layout of the building would impact. the property to the rear because the 2 ' 8" encroachment would place the proposed apartment within 714" from re. ert: line property Y . � 4 . It would create a special privilege inconsistent with past actions by the Board of Zoning Adjustments . After analyzing the Beard of Zoning Adjustments ' denial, of the sub- ject conditional exception, the staff concurs with their findings . Because the property is vacant, there are numerous design alterna- tives available to the applicant which would permit the development of a duplex, while complying with the minimum standards of the Or- dinance C:)de. Therefore, any claim of hardship is one that is self-- imposed due to the selection of design. Further, as previously stated , the Hoard% granted the applicant a conditional exception for a front yard setback which allowed for design flexibility. The granting of yet another conditional exception would be one of special privilege , inconsistent with the philaBophy of past actions by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. p RECOt NdATION: The Planning staff and Board of Zoning Adjustments recommend that the Planning Commission uphold the Board ' s denial of Conditional Exception 14o. 82-39 bared on th_ following findings: J t C . B. 82-39 (Appeal. ) : September 8 , 1982 Paige 4 FINDINGS FOR DENIAL 1 . The applicant can modify the design of the auiIdings allowing for compliance with the minimum standards set forth..in the Ordi- nan(:-y Code. 2 . A substantial haruship has not been demonstrated to grant the subject c:anditi ona 1 exception. 3 . The granting of Conditional Exception e2-39 would be a special ptivilegv inconsistent with trite past actions of the Board of Zoning Adjustments . 4 . The proposed layout of the building would adversely impact the property to the rear because the 2 ' S" encroachmcnt would Enlace the proposed two-story apartment within `714" of Zroperty line. ALTERNATIVE ACTroN: The Planning Commission can overturn the Board of Zoning Adjustments denial of Conditional Exception No . 52-39 if the following findings are made 1. That there are except;oval or extraordinary ci_•cumstances or-, con- ditions applicable to the lane:, buildings , or premises involved, or to the intended use of same, that do nct apply generally to the property or class of uses in the same district. . 2 . That such conditional exec-)tions are necessary for the preserva- tion and enjoyment of sub ant.ial property rights . 3 . That the granting of such •onditional exception will. not be ma- terially detrimental to t, public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the confo Ang land, property, or improvements in the neighborhood of tY property for which such conditional exception_ is sought . } i 4. That the applicant is w _ling and able to carry out the purposes for *7hi.ch the conditional exception I.s sought; that he will pro- ceed to do so ithov,t unnecessary delay. ATTAC NTS: 1 . Site Plan 2 . Atea Map 3 . Minutes from Board of Zoning Adjustments 4 . Ldtter of Appeal . I • . 1l9 1�1NlM4 ?c?NCNct DM 2�6 CTIONAl DISTRIt T MAI' 2 --- 5 -- 11 �, •„ ,f-� a(���r•tI D Pt Ct irin , r!r.I' r,r;+.r r � � . ...r.•r .� ... C1It C0114'It LO 14f 1.'f Ir) 11,10 f l f(1;!' ruI rrf�f I• D9r1 hn nL.-w1� fir_,11 M1 ��• I -,I r•. r �r•r.,�, ..,r HUNIr �I�� 1�1'( I � B� / C-14-1i1Rt IO• J•tit IC r•4fi 4.9 rrrN . cnw.. •,.r !• 1.4 1 It IO 4 \ r. .r' 11r11 r,l r r..ryu .� r,l rw ,. ,,., r ,•. 7"" -1l. • r 1 i rtORAl�G . COUN3 Y , (, At, lYORNIAr. , .•1, t�l . ln V • 1 l.hn 71.:1,1 r,;'k.r 'c4 In.!1 + I1.{', 1111 ;tl'. u...�arr���� r••' p,•r• r !•!,!1t 1•r e,yr •u>t i n i11,.}1,i34,ow4, ,•irl.•Ii r.l, n,H•lS 1• ti •yth a •(• 1» r,r .1 ,a CI , w• l4 .n I irl •W YO H-�yrKf7.A1.27.i1A{r k1 R{s) ►{•t�.i+: �,h+ Pr.'r r;,�N 117MCIJy.rr7. /•1121t 1�11 r �) n •, r r�r rt r,wn.. ..n���lrrurr�..• r hrr.r.,r. fy l,>. ►�•(111.1#(1'/�.N 1, 11.2-i• 101{ f./r• !I'r; '•�1 rWl,lr.,�.r �,• ll{• AV[ L �1/ 'r _ .YI..ram•YV..wwIYWYY/.—aa-•.Y•��M�—�.w�e—w.-w. `-r_...' - �. `._ r.I., 1 r� .• � .i 1-11 t •,• r !d' II w J7 RI F;1 ;!� RI Ir '`;�, Ilia R/ IWI TV ; . 1 Y F. r n llllrt `-J fin i C F- t t • III 1•�l -All l i ( \ ;+�, � a, �:•� 1. •� �. ..t31...__--� �tS�\ CF-R :v R' t' RI R+ I R I UA s-c�wei.i -_ _..._t_u 1 1 M h to R oll,. JJ R2 C4! y „�. 3 R3 wl-rtwii 7W•lsrr•Ir• � I( .�_a3 ;'jr{84f1�• :�a ,.. pry /� CF- ) �G• R2 j\R3 rr�at.ru I r �•�� C ''.�f1' ;Ni Wong ( yr Yi rw ' RI R3 �� �4 R2 R2 r R2RI Ir•1•, l ii�•'/r. II ��� �. RI � i�( .,3 t•. � � ....� ' tXki� R3 1 R2 R2 R3 R? R2 1 'owlR 2 R I r� � C- --r�+�y�, l R2- C oil I CIF R � RI RI ' C4 "i RI R3 R3 ' M �' 1 r ; ' •� i ; ; IJ R3 R3 R.3 RI R3 R3 Q�N Ai n ) 5 r _ �� !' C • r.W�wwr�►,l/wF.M..�re W...r .s+.+.w� --wv�+w...�wY...�+r.r..oc�.+W.�. w Iy I-s rCT1ONAt L4STRfC; T MAP 20 - 5 - 1I CITY OF zraerr4 1-FLUNTINGTON BEACH USE OF PROPERTY MAP l ulwse,tkL �` + cr- IkUt i r -T�'� ✓'CF-RWWI Iwlwu Jlt 4 0 R ¢ �M.IlT.1:l LLtI1:1�I iL1 LuT 110711 T 7'I 1 all uAmn A Mkt .1 .. CF-R CF-E l- • -fit CF-R uva,l li �1 :P CPR oftwok J CF.p �; '"--wocr ..3+ l CF-R �ti �• _- _ _ 4 , Stab eqt Y gperty i MOI�♦r I �..� T _�, {� 1 ., . M I+1 I ��.��Ir �• I I FAk r MI �1 I w 4, 4. CL Ld 1 0 1 CL ui uj 44 d +�,,. I i •t) rl el I Li ui x uj ' 1 I 1 4 r. ; 1 l 4J r, _I• Ln 11 L r Lr) Q I ; z { � ° LIx ; • .►.J � f uj Vic, r iS IY, so OL v - ��N,w A RSE-READWO F.-AN 9BR LIVING UNIT s _s, fir. -�I' �•�yjr r 'rT RiyM�X—A�irGira�s. 6 I OPPOSi1 E MANS ~ 'fir .. 74 ' -- GARAGE ! `GAL +� s3 - -Oki A_ —... ._ ..._.�.....��r w— ... .- •.. .. —— .. ... .�.- 711 C s. r.. t SITE DEVELOPMENT FLAN _ _ � � i 1 a.' i MIN HUNTINGT_ ON _jEACH BOARD OF ZONI&a USTMENTS Room B•-6 , civic Center 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA IrNBODAY,j�JULY 21•j 1962 1 : 15 P.M. IW MEMBERS EXHTs Webbe Evans, 'Vogelsang, Smith BOARD MZMBER_ABSENT : Kelly STAPF MEMBER PRESENT: Zelefsky mxNUTts : ON MOTIGN BY SMIS'll AND SECOND BY V(X; ELSANG, THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 16 , 1982 , WERE APPROVED AS TRANSCRIBED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : j tots AYES., Webb, Vogelsang , Smith NOES : None ABST/6IN Evans "SMT : Xelly REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 8 2--3 9 A licarnt% James E. Neal, General Partner V.ftmTo permit a 2100 encroachment into a 10 ft. rear yard natback. Property located at 4802 and 4822 Flideouit C.ircle,, zoned A -2, Two-Family Residence District . Acting Chairman Evans informed the applicant, as well as others present requesting Conditional Exceptions and a Use Fait, of guidelines necessary whereby allowing the Board to grapt these types of applications provided that in so doing, the general purpose of the Ordinance Code is not affected. Staff outlined the proposal and stated that this request is categorically OZOMPt, Class . S, Oal?.fornia Env,kronmentai Quality Act, 1970 . It was i st4ted tha an April 7, 1982, a conditional exception (Nof 82-9) was appmyod pamitting a 3 ' 8" encroachment into the front yard metba►c:k ' i i u 1a Minutsist H. B. Board of toning Adjustments July 21, 1982 page RwO x,. of aide entry garage for subject property , At: that time , the plan did indicate the encroachment of 2 ' 8" into the applicant ' s rear yard setback but was not requested on Kr . Neal ' ,s application nor advertised. The applicant also appeared before the B7A on June; 230 1982, with a tentative parcel, map (Na . 82 - 559) for this property which approved c:onsol Ua t.ion of the five ( 5) existing small Icts into one (L•) parcel . Acting Chairman Evans opened the public hearing. Mr. James Neal , General partner of Sunset-Orange Partnership, addressed the Board . When tney purchased they property a Few years ago , they Originally contem - ' it;ed building a triplex but had difficulties in meeting the access requirements of the Fare Department along thc. private alley . A precise Flan of Street Alignment was approved allowing for three ( l) Ane-;w ,streets i:1 this particular area which created subject 1.0t to become suhs'•andaxd in size . He said that because of the odd shaped conf iguL•ation of the lot, they have had a very ditr'icult time in trying to design salable livable units while at the some time enhancing the neighborhood, tie urged approval of the 2 ' 8" encroachment into the rear yard setback allowing the dining room area for both units to be enlarged . The Board expressed concern because a hammerhead at the end of the cul-de-sac was not retiected on the plan. George Tindall., Engineer for the project, informed the Board that they have received approval on the plan from Public W,.:)rks and the Fire Department . Re further stated that: the Fire Department did not require the hammerhead . Mike Mc Mahan , adjacent property owner, stated that: he felt the applicant should conform with the. zoning =ordinance and the encroach- Mani: should not be granted . Jess Mc Mahan, property owner in back of Mr. Hoa►1 ' s property* questioned the Hoard as to whether or not if he applied for a variance foc• an encroachment in his rear yard %M1d it be approved. 'the plia heaairq was closed. VohrA diacussion ensued. Board Member Smith motioned that Conditional fta*ptlon fins. 02-39 be approved as the subject lot is substandard In Si" (30 ft. aide by 125 ft. in length) created by the precise PLC,of Street Ali runt' with a .: 9 private street as they only c;:,.a►ne `11r1U. t0e s antic the property. the motion failed for lack of a 2 BZA 7/21/62 ,I,k, R Minutes M.B . Board Zoning Adjustments � July 210 1962 Vale three 40 140TION BY WEBB AND SECOND BY EVANS, CONDITxONAL EXCErTION NO . $2-39 WAS DENIED WITH REASONS FOLLOWING, BY THC POLLCVIINC VOTE: IMONS OR DFIIIAL i Conditional Exception No. 82- :39 was denied by the Hoard of Zoninq AdJustments based upon the following 1:e43ons 1. The applican�: can modify the design. of his building on the property allowing compliance with the Ordinance Code . 2. Ho hardabip was demonstrated. •3. The proposed layout of the bui.ldiny would impart' the property ' to the roar because the 2 ° 8" encroachment would palace the propor ? apa►rtatent within 714 " from the property lino . 4 . it , w^•41d create a opecial privilege inconsistent with past actions by the Board of Zoning Adjustments . AYE;i ' Webb, Evans, Vogelsang NOES : Smith ABSTAIN: Nona CONDITIONAL EXCEPTXON NO. 82-40 A licant : Mr . Daniel E. Xafer To pe"Mit a reduction in parking . Property located at 16912 Dolsa Chica Road . Staff outlined the proposal and stated that thy S request .is categorically Exempti Class . 51 California Environmental Quality Act, 1970 . Acting Chairman Evans opened the public hearing. Mr. Daniel E. Kafer , proprietor of Daniel0s Salon , addressed the Board . He informed the Board that presently he has an established business located on Warner Avenue in Huntington Beach . He said they currently occupy a building with 1, F90 sq . -ft - which is 'not enough space to effectively serve their growing clientele . The office building he is considering leasing for his salon consists , of 2 , 871 sq, ft . which ti has an entitlement of ton parking -paces . He stated that the center: ;. which ha La proposing to irelocate - -o was conceived as a mixed use -- �� ' ret LI hrid office development of two buildings : an 8, 000 sq , ft. retail building and a b , Odd sq . ft, office building. Current parking fbt tha center is the code required sixty spaces determined by the respG0tLV1 also of the retail and office facilities. Mr . Xafer conducted e parking analysis. He said the parking demand under the most axtreme circumstances is apprcx1mately half of the forty spaces provided for the retail uses, This figure does not include any of the twenty spaces pr i4 d and required for the office building . Because Daniel s Salon is an established business, witt, established hours , operating on an appointment bass-Be he felt it was possible to make predictions about �•3- BSA 7/21/82 ,.9 M 4j 1 mom *r: '"Volt LAW OFFICES WGSWAWW,CA 92883. , ; !'. U. U August 20 1982 .C;i, CA r, . I •r'. �,r i' Secretary, Huntington Beach y ^ Planning Comission 2000 Main Street, P.O. Box 190 • Huntington Beach, CA 92648 PE, Appeal of Board of Zoning Denial Applicant.: Sunset-0ratt9e Partnership . . ' by James E/ Neal , General Partner Subject : conditional Exception No . t. :.-.39 • �' : To the Honorable Conan• -3sioners . Mis letter is an appeal by the above-referenced applicant from ' an adverse decision rendered by the Board of Zoning Adjustments . on July 21 t 1962, The grounds hy' which the applicant deems itself a;rgrieved are. as followa I . By reason of the "precise street alignment" imposed on the „• ', subject property, a design hardship, withovot allowing a special privilege, will be created if the encroachment into the rear' � 't'' • 1 - yard sett back in not allowed. $. Thehistory of the files with the Planning 1 partate7►rit -o+ the M' _ City of Huntington Beach , see CE78-50, CE80-4 , and 82-9" p rtray' an applicant that has complied in good faith so ara to build a guaUty project to a difficult area of Huntington Beach. 'ktf Enclos a requisite filing fee of one hundred and sixty-fivw , ($16S 00) . Very trul ours L J" a. NmA r�eral Partin StBi$RT-ORANGE VARMRISHIP `1 �• ^ JRtMrcxt •,wy • • yJ M n., H oR. planning Commission Sept. at 1982 Page 7 ON 140TXON BY WINCHELL AND SECOND BY HIGGINS THE .APPEAL ON USE. PERMIT NC. 82-23 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 71, 1987 , BY THE FOL- IMYNG VOTS: AY88i Winchall, Paone, Higgins NoNBs LivengOod,, Schumacher ABOUTs Porter, Hiz ' -ihangir ABSTAIN: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 82-39 (APPEAL) Appellant and Applicants James Neal, Ganeral Parter, Sunset-Orange �; p xt�ers�►f F; An appeal of the Board of Zoning Adjustments ' denial to pe:tmit a 218" encroachment into the required 10-foot rear ,yard aetback of pro- perty located on the south side of Hideout Circle, approximately 173 feet crest of Green Street. The public hearing was opened. Speaking in favor of granting the appeal was the appellant, James Neal . The public heak ng was closed. Conaissiuner winchell asked where the stairs were located, Mr . Bellavia said they were located inside. Sore discussion took place regarding the encroachment at the first story lLvel . Commiss._oner Livengood made a motion to overrule the BZA denial and approve Conditional Exception 82y-39. T11is motion failed for lack of a second. AN MOTION BY HIGGINS AND SECOND BY SCHUMACgER THE PLANNING COMMISSION UPHELD THE BOt.RD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS ' DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEP - TION NO. 82-39 BASED OIL THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE FINDINGS FOIE DENIAL: 1 . The applicant can modify the design of the 'buildings allowing for j compliance with the minimum standards set forth in the Ordinance � Code. 20 A substantial hardship has not been demonstrated to grant the eubjeet condi`ion&l exception. 3. The granting of Conditional. Exception No. 82-39 would be a special privilege inconsistent with the past actions of the Board Of Zoning Adjustments . ' i 4. The proposed layout of the building would adversely impact the property to the rear because the 218~ encroachmmnt would place tim prvpoa two-story apartment within 714" of the property lime. =7- 9--8-82 P.C. i D• i You • R.B. Flanning Commission Sept* Sp 1982 • Page a 11Y t Higgins, Paone, Winchell, Schumacher t p B= Livengood AMUNTs Porters Mirjahangir w ANSTAM Noses CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT No. 82-21/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 82"-28 �1Ap►�ta4nt s iluntingtoA Beach Company wr....�.+-- .i��......r�....■u■rf. ...r. w+.�. .,..—.«ter n■ A request to permit the establishment of a parking lot pursuant to Section 9331 ta? of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Cade, on property located approximately 500 feet north of Yorktown and approximately 500 feet eas-, of Main Street. The public hearing was opened . Dave Eadie said he would be available for any questions . See,ng ne, other persons wished to address this issue# the public hearing was closed. ' ON MOTION BY SCHUMACHER PWD SECOND BY LIVENGOOD NEGAIIVE DECLAP.ATSON NO. 82--28 WAS DEEMED ADEQUATE AND APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES : Higgins, Livengood, Winchell , Paone, Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Pir•tter, Mi.rj ahangir ABSTAIN: None ON NOTION BY SC HUMACHER AND SECIOND BY LIVENGooD CONDITIONAL USE PER- MXT NO. 82-21 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: 1« The proposed secured parking lot is compatible with existing office uses and Future residential uses and will not be detrimental to the general health and safety of those people working or. residing .in the in-mediate area. 2. The propcsedd secured parking lot is co7:,oatible with the land use designation on the General Plan which is medium density resi- dential. CONDZ TONS OF APPROVAL: 1. They site plan received and dated July 29, 1982 , shall be the approved layout. 2. The secured parking lot shall remain open duri,r.5 the day for use by the employees and customers of the existing office complex. � 3. Repair# service, refueling and other related functions shall bos prohibited on the subject property . --8- 9-8-82 - P.C. i a vp f-'/N T NG (114)808.06M. 8231 We91mIn%tsr AV WWe. Wa3tminsW, CA WWI September 20 , 1982 tuntington Beach City council City of Huntington Beach P .O . Box 711 Huntington Beach , CA 92646 RE : Appeal of Planning Commission Dental of Conditional. Exception Uo . 82-39 � To the Honorible Mayor and Council Members I of the Huntington Beach City Council. { This is an appeal for the above.-re;f.erenced Planning 1 Commission action of September. 8 , 1982 . I The grounds by which the appl i catit deemed itself ,-iogri eved I i is as follows ; ► 1 . By r.eauon of the "precise street. alignment" imposed on the subject property , a design hardship , without allowing a special privilege , will. be created if the encroa :hment into the rear yard set back is not allow-ad . 2 . The building plans cannot: by modified by design without loving the quality of the project to the axe& , potential tenant and owner , and the City of Huntington Beach . Enclosed is a photocopy of the building plane no submitted prior to Karch 24 , 1982 . RD a act is the requisite filing fee of $LGS . 00 , ieryJ truly YB {1 f ►" JA1 35 E ► NEAL J+: clt Enclosures (2) 4 r 5 ask* •' r, NUTICY. TO CLERX TO SCHIA));Ii,l�: PUl3l,1C HF,A�iIA'C� ITEM to { TO: CfTY CLERIC'S OFF ICE DATE FRS; YLI._- Q!C . law eNl' Sc IN c -,< RLUSS SCHEDUM A PUBLIC HEARING USING 1'HE ATTACHED LEGAL HCIL ICE FOR TM DAY OF C��� �� 1,97 /AFO9 are attached AP' s will follow No AP' s I Initiated by: I Planning Commission Planning Department Petition _ { Appeal _ ✓� - Other Adoption of Environmental Status (x) YES NO Refer to -_-, Planning Department - Extctnsion �F3 :'tir( for additional information. * if a tai. please transmit exact wording to be required to the legal . y y _ _ r VIM LAk 1 STATE OF CAUFORNIA 1s 41W iota twl Cawtty of OFOOk" CITY Of HUNTIMOTaM NEACN CITY PLANNING C0046410ION PUILIC HEARING ....r._ ..._.,,.�..�:...v...�.... 414"of t'•ati; ,enih 1 County of Otatye f APR I L L. ELLIOTT � That 1 am and at ail times lwmin mentioned waw n citizen it( • de the (tnited sutrw.ewer the s it cif twenty-one Vrars,end that I t min not a patty en, nor intet"ted in the shove rhtitiecl matter; r � �i �,,��� that I am the principal rkrk of thr printer 4 the �j'c HUNTINGTON BEACH IND. REVIEW a ntMwspaper of general ritrulatienl,puliliahed in the City of � � w �c}: HUNTINGTON JEACH t'i+u,nty of Or/nee and which trrwapaper i+ pitblish•d 6sr thr dimminatkin tit Hital ne"and intelligence of N grneral charec for. and which newspaper at all times herein n1s"isti4+ned had MIAad and mull has a Nita fide sulwription list of paviiiK aul►Mcrihrrn, r and which newmpstper h/a kwn eataiblished, printed and puh• P"k iitatted at reguiat intervals in the &W County of Orange Ina a t'`" ' perW cuoirding tine y-,or that the ntotire, of which the � d anreraed is a printed cuprf, has twee puhliehed in the tepoty and rntirt it i.*d maid newspaper, and tiot in nny istipplemew themif,an the full.iwing dam,to wit: ri AUGUST 289 1962 I cwetffy► tar dsriarc" wti/r pamok►of perry that the 6wmi- INS is W"card caar/t tti �OL..... QfI�YE.. .. .. ....... .. .. .. .. GARDEN Cali mmila,thk t w &Y at AtI fi.. , Ig. R2. .. A0Ir1i Le, 6I1lsetA ... . .... ..... ...... ........ .. ., .. .... .. ....... �wtw• e llyyyyJ{M.N,✓.J d p •N , y, 40" I"1,+C Waral 176,-201-36 i In#Rdtator Blvid. CE #82-39 Appxft,t Mickmi W Mcfft& n W"mit tom`. (�s1if 1Uusct 25, 1982 (J!-!) 4831 Sacxy T. + Hunti.rqbm B"ch, Wif 92642: 1116t Rutwship 178--191.--31 M*Wwtmr lUvd. VaImi timmuxbrena 17&201-37 mobdo , Wif aux 1998 .leas A McMahan 9 3-36b9 tlsula ';ism, Calif 14334 Frui.tvale Rd 92G12 Valley Cbnter, CaUE 92082 179-191,41 17a-191-37 178-201-44 fly of Hmtirgi m Beach Ferey&m Kavarmvor Shaffer Develop wnt Inc 9275 Dalbur %Wchael McMahon 8e,llflower, Calif 9 )706 4531 Smr Y w* "itington Beach, Calif 92t; 174-191--09 178r-1.91-49 1_78�.201-SO A 8 i#� Vilia F'=aids Kurcbaums Lec F Bach Crave F auxler .11231 Wcatberby Rd 2739 E Mean Blvd. Wx 554 Ws Alamitos, Calif Ldxl Beach, Calif Sweet Bench, Calif 90742 90720 90803 17&1191-20 178-191-50 178-201-51 My Belle Cook A. W Cl ap mn Mabe1, C Fairchild 2033 LrWal,e Ave 3) 5361 cbmemial Dr, John W Mrx hill 1 t4re dem.7.i9, Flinn. Itntirygton F ach, calif 5050 Kltmp Avenue 55408 92649 mo. Hollywood, Calif 91601 I 178-191-U 178-191-53 178 -201--52 HmrY Rim , Fen j anWi Nbr-,imto Clavton R Souders L P 8ishap 6851 Via Ar*w i na Drive 113 Cologm Drive 7" Ad t-ILmtimitm Beach, Calif Santa Ana, Calif Arroyo axle, Calif 9342() 92647 92703 178•-191-23 178-191--54 178-201-54 L V tap Byron Marvin BisbDp Darold I Rand 7" s Ad 4781 Pearce St Apt. 1 4821 Pearm Avenue C1Ca%b, Calif n Beach, Calif Hmtirx3t n Bch, Calif 92649 92649 " 71- 178"-201-28 178-201-55 au a4�1gf3 Partnership Edward �' 1by rifle claret Rome 8231 Wb*b d mtar Avenue 4041 lease Ave Apt A Westminst*r, Calif Mrstington Beach, Calif iqmbo Callly 90265 92683 92649 174-191-29 178-20Y-33 178-201--56 m riaw IfSt- Wie D Ord Lyle F Still ! W�rt,in Lynn At3tLtwm 4861 Pearce Avenue 41S7 2 Ltva Oak Avwm 8306 Rmh S�u eenA. y�n4 H mtin)ton Beach, tom.:f ;IOaU 91 , CaLlii 1006 2649 Y UAW tit,, *a almodboo, C6' 9245i Ron (b CC #82-39 - ApFeal r9307 MU ftLwt August 25, 1g52 4TH) !o 30 8K416 O"f 9260 „ t Xdt*4 P.Ob Bm 127 omwat !l"dN C�s1if 90742 178-201-70 Lav ma*m C+ rtoa 9002 Aarrigtm Avwm Cb gwo C 90240 178-Ul-67 Dal K t 16692 Gcom Street 92"9 D m" M Unkhtimr JLGM m t pletclar cLrcle paom" vlu,ey, Calif 9 179- -78 Bart Malty omp 2M ftear' b CIA 92649 X104LL , madmt Elm" Am ,t, d� OIL- _ as •Y ti f d. -17 Publish 10/14/82 NOTICE OF POSLIC HEARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S OENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO 82-39 NOTICE I5 HEREBY GIVEN that a public heering will be held by th r e City Council of the City of HuntingWn Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civ ic Center, ^ Huntington $"Ch, :t the hour of 7:30 � ..�.�....,_,�.,,` P,��. , Or as Soon thereafter as passible on _ . t►bnda,v ^ the 25ttr day of October for the 14�Z Purpose of considering are appeal of the Board of Zoning Adjustment's denial of Conditional Exception No. 82-39 which was, uPhe l d by the PlanningCommission mnission at its September 8, 1982 meeting. Conditional Exception No. 82-39 Is a request q t to permit a 2 ft. 8 inch encroachment into the requires! 10 ft. rear yard setback. The ' subject property is located on the south side of Hideout Circle,eppraxinatel 1Z5 y ft. west of Green Street in the R2 (Medium oensity Residential ) District , F legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services. All intorested persons are invited to attend said hearing opinions for or against sai and express ttlei r d a eal Further �,infortion may be Obtained froth the Office of t ._,.— _ Str'e"et. Huntington Beech, e City Clerk , 20Qd Fain California .ornia 92648 - (714 ) 536-5227 �- CITY OF HUNTINGTOM BEACH ". 8y: Alicia M. Wentw►�rth Citv Clerk p _ i�t,mil` i . .. �. i�/��� •!.r �� � ' w.. s' T F _ r r° F�p At -- -, - - - y ( -- `_•_- -- • •' - "- l. . -� a._,..,.:..� - _ - -- -lam rTol oil .G.l.. �low _ I rf -•� r A sk -41 kam snowdo =_ rel ram'• 'lll�fY�l/y� Rom• �� ,� � � - -- - +�.. �-f�- - WC IF vx IT a.�. Y.r•�� �.1 ... �.� . i •� f • it 7r - _ 11JIi'iNk• s W"vw ilCf�ON 1d-C' l� ie1 � - f t � � L ___-Z. 2•a - �'. •--7 .� r -• • t1 .ram/ + - ' � �K. + �-. • fir • � / J - /1 q[p� VAT■m skill e �i'7�ii"...'R i�il�la""•r►�s.�►ai r 1 11 AMA LAYM Ya saa �s�ws�f a: r r t qqmm-m OWN NAM *K J __•1 -'• '�`�1•�� •�`^ � ..lr.rre r'am.r.•pa M. ftmwsrwn AM rr rw. • � •��� J r.ar�....n- r.urw •r.•�r�•wn�� �A.A�r ti.r.-w M- *•• i�.rr.• w�wr �" � r+�irs r.•• •.r1r.► ice..� �0 qlr��� s•ra-�r.r . am I r.a.•w.w a.alr fir w... a AMw�srli +' d .f.ra r r.n ar rw_ rrr '• M rw 'Ca M,ur�r rra.�wow.•�rr� rr�. ■ rw -`L��'.._ _ _ - ..�a.l,•�. .ss..ra rr rraawa .•r r wwr•..r�_wr..• . v w..rr.•��w•....�wrw �... r• & au..•s�r.i ■ar. � x � ..ar• �awf�w.ru-a ar ��wr f•ur•a r�s ww— �r w w.r - - -•_.- _• - ...1•.r_ �' 10416 q �..MM a ma ram.a r- A..v._ ft.r 1c." :r��r 1M WANIAM ~sr�in a.• w�lr tirr a { � .v� +.f irs a.saa.. Lvr v snww - �- Jam.i�.1 L�. a1i r�•i r�wgr r r 7r w .wa s. .wr� r w� �� w _¢ ' r 1 I. wAmm q ram• a• - ar. - * s.' �•••tea'•_� r � ru.rir: ..•�.rlr wrr_ � rrr ...rr. r•,v i i ` a r•�aa �s �. ' _ _ rr.•r•rri rrr.w w� .w.rt�www.e a M�r w�.a�i�_�M���.aar rwi� -- --e- - _ V• ./.aiw.rl.i 74.a 4�..lr•. .. �R1r�i��.f��l.ai "-TtIVP • MOOD�'DIl1 OETJIi� �•� - ., � •i MAW IMP s + --•�-• ----- __ LAMM - ;_ s�1s r } .i►�s� Yids~ i elomm WMLL 1 WALLow ��...�`�'.�■` ,� =►M z dmma r.=+ � .... t.. .• ram- -- '- ._ - _ � -r--�`- -- E `-'_" • ...a ;� ! !'OI���!bMO11E ! Qf�R SILL _ �----- _ - } 1,•K!r• _W Tamer -- __� w r - _. _ �..__ '-#�- i�'�'aMA si•t&s - S� grrY 140. W. ,r Mrw s•w -- __ - t F�h fYl1a�L� vans a a Low PLAN PLrO=Ali ftM 7 UMAYM POr. 3 iiiL F i �wPaa = FAr _ Anew" i 11 � d iPllal i 1�-70`'�MII� '-'��r+•:1� �� • s � i 11Mae low. } 1 _ F F p49 nw � 11 � ► 7 i �r ��i +a+Tii�a.�� a' �� 1 V 1 � 1 ♦-� nwMti�.11w�a . _ - -•wM� � - ' � 1 � i. - � ` �' ram,,. ".�#:� - _'lit d mum41 ONOM MMMK ter.. _ -- - - . --gem - ..� PL�"in -4 w' c IB M►Mil it.M�•�� R• Nam' w�.A - -' ,.-- .I�.w = a � _ I _ inlS Sit[ KI0 if H1LtLg6 rAb MT'1C11i wissioa - I AND •YC-I FOR ql iWFORGIATI01 MOAD11i 1'iT( it �' ____ w•�' _ ��" ____ _ �1 __ _ f'} _�-'-•3` , �+� '' a ---di," _ '4 V ]I + 4r 1'J 1�wr7+ar t 4 tf 1 - i " T ; 2m - _ jt Ap TO flSEm STMU HVEOM arm DEVELOPMENT PLAN _ Wv bex=•- Li 4 �; � d� � � �� � ip � `` 1(�� � ; �� it �t #yf •' i �� ���1 site •� toy �w 1 Jib- _ ! ■ •� -� 192 =I tt it r i tIoil i� •r ' � • r ��t � � ti = P i* t • li �wtil3t l�tl e�,itl �I�f� �j' !!1! � #t � titlt {tI - 5 ����� �� ! /i� �+ ►•,�r fly � # f``al != II�E� �� �i 4 �1�� � � ! �t �� # �� � t �a a#t��t � a i��� ii �• r �1 if !Jill, � �t � i to lit, tt ■ 1 .� � f � '� i I t �if� • f x�i �• ' t � � i i i ��� � �� 1 ��i '.� i lr�. �I,�� rt� li {t !�� 1 •�� t�E � ;, �� �� �i �; � i � !. !t� = ti � t~� � !! fit # �i� � p •� � � � � r��► � ��a t a � � �r �i i � ���ii i � '� 1 t�3 mop M 't j I•�. T 4 , Y,q 4', M � r•M1;,' r� _ r,TM• .. '.•5., +•.. �¢f . �,, . . ..,� i.r r,� ;LI(7w°'•�P '"i'Y i�Mlw< ', IW 1 I' •R } a � fin, r•�� � � o � ° M. •. . I �� P . - r � . lY' i � o- y •' .? __ .� _�—.—_ �r I� �1fR�a;iJ��l_,el_!1�r11± , _.-.._i._ moult. �.�Ila�. n rarlwlr �awllwM�111�1r1 r1aL�. aRlf+.atsa.f�la�a �>a���r��iar< _ ADA • awaw •rl-�„veal•Aaai!!_ate•mama a:art oars rafaa sr.a bam,maw art`aim•.t- • aa..a:.r rt•raa.r r a....a aa..a r r- • aaata i..•rri �aaa aI•aa ice.f� _ - Y_` _ �!t_ oral war•I' .a.ar.�_.war-..+..r r•�r s.w..••.r :�.ra r++w wr a.rM•yN our.aft'w1. '+s. •s.w. m wawa IN JO N"W.mm r w• %,+W as. - aI/wa•as sa IA Iara aIn:rt rjo Ywt fca.a +na ...raara arm a radar r marl twata.r sw s ar armwrra m a.aaac•�'•r`-str /ama✓i!- _ -'--A- - `=-r p- mr•r.alaaawr aa.roam ar wa aaa..raar•a r r.a r a.aLwa aa.aa.a Warr a aV aw Iilaat aaI at mill Yra i•a wl saaalt a ara�lawarlrarars rlt.rr laiq r-ws,amr all a -- - _ _ r _ - awatoms Ism+.wa Elwaa al•.ar d a saw ♦ wr-w.i..r r/..+r ra rm atararr.... •.rrar.•aaa naarw r wawdrtr Y wnama foam r.Iw rw aaaL amw a1r a rl a�.aa w Sri ra r•em-r aaaa.aaa...rtr a ar.a«r .. s•T•H am aa+wl a.a m.all.asawrfaw Aral art a.•.•arsrara ww •�a laiiarr - - - =-- °-- a•mmaa N r y�tw1•alaMapr.sa ri o.raaaar r aaa Ira wra,aawaa aaa � r..•.arw rsl a.w.a aswa rRalYr.r rraar _ - _ --r^ _ -l-.-y aW arrawa Oft.f�NI atom firma aatafw, • sa+•-a aaa a amr a.rw.a a.rl r Mr, f move all�ar rMrtl.amlal a!a as asr - _ _ -1- _ r'ra aaat l.lr.art!I14 awl a■IIrrM y r w sa•r w•IrM,•.aa oar:IT Asa at.raw.ra.lf r ytarwt saatsmq w Y armor rl faa V a a aver.e-f i as aroma r•"wa a41a.i �: +��•�wsu.r rr alas+•r•. swa•wa•r rw••.w r arrwrsrlara AM r a r•r.a awa wfw^ram an gamul a■a We. ' •r.rrMri-wwa as a atawwrdelftffiWl aa`�N WILY; 1�i!lido aiL_t ri allaaal ataaawa a./aN nw i a aawl! r.A.•a.a move aala r.aaawr w raar.a uaas w�••i>•lwtaf/aaf�i aaaY ra - - _ - - - _ _ - _ - - li r .r.r.a•.a.r r.r.w.•s. L w..w waver aaa arwa>•c a.At a aaa M• amlws nwrw!aria w aaa�a, a. aas arrm ar oa.a+aals _ - - _ar+•.�a awa•►r•ar r..a•r.aaara..r r M • IIlr•is awlY w Alaa.r rw.r r r.as rota rrr w av.=A,aw rR4 aIr a+ Y.Y Mr�.aw'.aw7_!• �,•,,a, .oar_ 1 .M sue.a Iwa�aw r mt,aw mamma _ oil astr n•a•a a•,>•w ti:7alrlt•aw Yrl•rs frlrwr.aw Y aanmr molar r ssi ,wr a.rr aamaw aa.ar I •.1r Iola a:ra.L me saallnara awa as Wallow ••••-a..rw ra.r arwl.w..a.r qNa w r aal�r r.a•.lr a...•a.•a..s r ._ 1 >• r•ararta r a.aaw a vaa •molar attar r 1 a.Iga.aAw+awt�aala �e- - aa/•r,ara.r a a art•.rr..r.r r ar. 1 r.m.a aw.a wawa•r:a aw.aa N.a ar w saaaa alit N arR.1•w.a an.Y .. 7-i a.alaV:.a Askew-K•T.7.L att•�'-� S - - M• Y anf a a&-"—�,a watt•w r,., w room ar.ar•.a rrrr aacaa.aa Ala w•-4aw I.1.a war..am.,r•...a w. ! • y+f�K7 ra,!M•!r a y �3I VAaI•.,rr r�•N•Asa r•r.aaaa.a a.aw,sa,w awlalY w arrtl?Ias»wl mama as 7■L 7rwr N fa.rtr.aaI r 1-• LLaA!•a f.l1a� • aralaa�swam ar aY love a vet•w csawr `._ -- _ - - - .+a,ra•ra ISAIa.w Ills.r aMr•Ir r• t.1.L a aa•1w•f lea�.M.at♦r awe ally.!• �Iw1 _-_ - _ - - a.•pasr al•aw.el1a.P.r aaa.w a an mlrw. aaA wave a rr a mamma.r aR -la f>r M awY qr+rY•!at.w.nr M ar,Asa wrA a m.aaa.as r.. -i i �•alatm•aAa as ffa�a aarrta rr,d awnaaw atr aw wtr..ms - - - 1 alb a .a lim 1% AIM.4 ms atom asa.aaat - a. +.a.a alarraa r raamrr.l.....f r. ws.r,w wr.w.w+a.aar n oar a ra wratr rra•tea•.0•u. i 71t r - - .rr r,rrm.ra ...a tw artr•aw.a rw.ay r as eaaprtm,Asa.a Ms rr wr wr aJ al.ral w arwa.err a.- is ar u.a•><•�.aara••r roam. wr.w sra.•.a y r••a,.at•-Asa a/mm aaa a.N,r asu a awl IWO 'r•.ena.aaa a rtaaae•-la-rN Arm ...1-i w.a r r■4.,,Y Iat...ra•aaa,t •r r.rt s.•••ra rtm..o�.aY mama i•r ��• - - -r •a•a•a.aF .arwa •a/aw.w r+w a L- rllra - ssw.lane"law sa•tsa Ana a aw IawLlla a•taly 'sw•a MV a RM.a!w. f_a a! _ ■■ - _ M•r-t.a aIwac+tfa aK••mat a a+w,i alAw w ,r•.,r rrr.r aaa.•a r.. •- � ' !a'•- - r at _ __ • Asa/war Asa/rw r aft•w ream,a as momb - r.a r•,ram•1.rraa aw r.wr:r.arra r Rra -: .r-•.sa-s t •rr.rw eau:...r•r.w amw,a.r raratl,a r w r aaL ala.a . w a.aa .rl MM.am.„tsa.ra4 r.. ..! 1fa Itala.:-- --_,a_-- Y ar•M a+war..r•.- - f r+aaa:..a..•c. . .....•�.t.r...Iarwa.cs•Aft .1.N awww�16 -AV6- -� • yaa•wa+wasra�a....w...�.r - _ •.a.r!ii w• Mull Ltns,a. Aa1f•r Ia,�Ia y rrf a t.r ra s a.•q.No raw 2•i —� _-t a w'rr aY Mom �Itlls a Alt qi 1 1QaL- - - •-r ra..,/aa r•f a•rrw :••a ur/ar...,r r Asa.alr.oa ar a••. -...a a alas+.,+at.r. _ - .__ a. __�.'�. a Ia...rM L rr a.•r.rRaa aaaarraa.+.a- -_` -•� err••�. 1.....«..r 5 alu r••wr. "'a..Ow Ir•IaIL./r•,.ram A-JS�''r aw.•Olt w.r.r ..M.am 1•1,.ar••w N m ar•a Ara... 1-a -; -- - r a all •ate a s..r r r r.r m a..r w �. .. /••.Iri l.a•wY K• `•'Ilan Yrb.,a l .a•,r.. eta... :www�,veal.07�R rr..Asa a r -v.w.r sw la a!raw.s 1 �4 w •�r•+t ra��� f�__ - - tat s+,:\" raa•a.w a.Asa a.a opal a ar.ra.a.a:.a rr _--__ -aver m Y►r..rraailr - rf-r�"--- J w'i.a a rr aa..RNI ' a+'.•..a r•/a r Ara a+.r a•YAM•.frr'!• L .ara.JN■raw• ••ra.aa•a aaca t.ra r a.m•a.r - .. Iw ANI ..r.wa a..tr...a ..r-a..aw..run a•rr.a ry a ra w+a - , rrw w s FN w a/►.a.-r N all l.r wa'.Ns/.aa.r,.twat•r r.-• .•N war r•al •� I—aa..i r.,a rrs r r'a rAa.a r move.P r 1 ra.raaa• � --a � - r•Y: as+.+ww raw.a tara.r rn. move ate. aaM.a•r/ar..M Y•a't l�a ww"al tr/ILran -- - --,T- r J..r.oar.....a...-r a...a.w:t..w. r-..c. T•. eAlm w_w -Ma aww r.�•.r•a�a tea.•.ar.�a•r A.n aa4•a r ra:-raa�•ar��, 4%wsnb t L aaa�aas aw � NY w /n abeam 4w•w 4wome on - _ .- f+...•,r � mo Lr r Y al• ala ar oar,I- •�— -aralarr-� �a . wa.r Y.a a-IaF a+a.YY a R•fllaw - y. .rs a aa.u•m rr«.•w w'r,.a w.r •••+ f• l v•••n•• RratL Yw.r.aw,S am La ai 'Ia•awal a�ffsaa•a.aa saw alwaww ra•ai�a �taaa aa rsa.ama'sma ` - a.y aver a.ro r•+•...rear r•.•rr. l•.r+.u.r a..•r r :'m.a,A.•�s r_. II- arrr a ar.a -~raw.lama'ft - I•a.•..a s•P rR." W-1w W.a ft— ar— __Oft- 4awk afralaar.,ammw+w �iAsa! ..�1,raw wrr•ra aalti rw a K ra..aa.... T —_r Y rr o :NswtM•.• rtr.r or R atti oar M��m„wYio waaY•w. �`��� r - w rats.ra tmaa•.a was a 48.oar r w.... a.r.r w.rw >7At 1•./r Iw-'a a— - fm Ap S r Ala NIaI �I aalwi araaar •a«wr•q1.ar.a«•ar t ar a.w7n M,r f•L•.•.•r.Up.-w•Cwa•, a 1 mMaa AM. aw�aam. p AIM cam--momm ,a•I •aa,l aAW•rya JYrJIf Ira s_ a a a aY alarm asi..save AIARA,aaaaar arm - r r"r a r Ara f�YaA iti at araama�oar.aaaa o ti r:L•rr♦Y•a 1's:w•1/1•r.rn 4atart-,...a•^ •^.V r...r a !•ar..a.r.• _4_ - .nrr•t m a.rrr..w ti L nIl a.r •.ts Ir,, wow w - '1`1Ot awsawar.ramy.wa•rf mammal�a�awa�•�►arr aaN mammas.SAW_ - - ,waw�f/w asaaa�ar a�L.saaaa ararlrawa..a ...war..r•,r...wa.• r r...r::•�.a.ti w-w a.a.+.a a.aaa r a.a Ara,./rw.atsr war -nalw r w•mw rat alas - - - w Asa••1.1 laa•r.r•'-a••..b•rba y.,as.r1a r •y veal..tale. ate!aa.•rr rate -man r..A Asa• f saga Y s�aawa Yai�r�wafara - -r•r. - a./r r••r+ }atom • al...yi NaaA am. orlow 1ar1 rl.a veal am&aaano.aiNwaN aai Ala 1•aaE - - •• •a.•a..Mal.. a.r•a...._.ar aarw I-•.Aaa • awnat 1 a��rA aa�a rawr�la.err•r=w rr,aoa.■as ram••veto r.arflar r cal. lama Sa •• •raatrrsialw�a�la. ,-�__- _ •_ O.•.,..rw i�.r r.wr n w /•i alasraa.aaataala Ara. - L twlac..a aaaLar N aaarw at mover alaaalaaaa f a�oar Y Vauban aaN l,w aaraara -1 • .. ...r•. Asa« a r r.w..r ar..,.-C rra. «.rwr LT sA.rs oar.a��s. •a.aa.ar r w a.rata I.M w~ a awww.r.Ammar sAi aaa•i a u a stela]a l w a..Nmo � •t .: I a•ssr M•a_y atM HIYI w as alalala Asa..a r« aaatar-a aawaralw as aa.Y ai oar aola err - s a w•a•r:- .r ar.a.aara r an►..art nr a..r..aw a. Lw...a.r+a a.waN+.l. a a• 7K raw as1.L ow alalL awwa frL oar.a ass wa>ri a�aML a SWIM atti Asa- - - yr..N/arPr r Iw r W.v•ra • Yw/r M aa•am r war art.ova. r_r ar F wr s.rMa•rt ra rw as W aa aasa.sa aw a w marate• -"Am oar.•a+r r.r•.a•r..r w 1.•.r rrw lI aat....w..a•m/r:aFa a.r':wa� J me-0 ar MO a war r•f.mr••ra ti•al aaa•ar lass •�fIN a 1 aa.asnow err.slla ar to rfarR awaaari aa�+r sa • - r.rrr r a attatar a•w aa.af►rI. w • a.rr«..•.a•.r w.atr aver r.s as a all.ra ��M!���a•�i -- ■li]L•aa1i iR■r oar r+tweawaarwwi aw•raa a•'•a•••a OrNa GM J f�a Irla'!-•5 wrla •1 a�-s s.r.:a.a•!/.alr_�lama t0 raYr ar•>t.-+�• wr•swtlars iirr araaara.rratrr.our •aamaia�aa r r .Lk arr rwrw a1110. srw will■'Aw anal sr wi N a.wr.r•/.v..w. ,a•/a P a ammo.Ir aaaY mi S- r.rs•area•wars tea.r a+r i••r__m aar - '+••Ir r r..at..a.raa a•raro w w we arra t-�IL. a'!•INa r a0�••alkf a al,,.•ar l>r Ara Maw ass do Y aaaaa r a.a aaaaa.A as 4 arw�ream analaa ~rl a i dt w -- • as•rn+••••ra aa.I,-all"watt.!Ara was at•..r-ar r7aasw al Aasmw•late,r a1s�i w arms M%aaaaaaa+f_as t _ err-1 Oa a..K 9a.I..aw,r•r a.r.. ••s••r . taro ar aaa/.aw' r ar•�sa1R.swrra M. atr.wl.a.a_mm a}•wr swa oar aw Ara a as a r am.aaa.fa maw Ar•ataa as ataawtsa%awwm �r sae wa.ra a - aar.l..r Aaar.aw.r.ti •. ..mart r moms mama.Asti P ataraa base. ....Asa ar a.a.rr.. aaa a ar•'gNL.low as•tab Lwrlw. - •N.•1 err/r.� aasaA M.soffowR _ - - a •a•a.a+r ...ow r.c.a.r a.r r r r as»crra•Aso. o r swam w aroma rr.r ?. war aver ra a awY wma.sYlaaa��aY' r usra amw■as tarlY w r�awtaa a amp•a.r.!a Ara •.•F,•aa wa rta area a.a.aara.1atiA ai tlaaai milt oar aaftlN.a aor ass �•` - �•M •a•m••.w rr a aaa..r.art arm•r __ a.r.r.....:•war c/r'rw ar aaaw- -sawwalr atop anraaar sawrw o ar LmaJt.ca. i mama aaaM:i Ywmmi a-..a y.a a rr a•.a mart. s taCu r I..~oar Ara w rrw •qO sr..s atrwat v aaa at w rr t nowt L. -ML aaaY!ssli as •■a..•"'a 'r•,•••••.• rr ar•iaR a Iar. ry w./alaar r alto aaaatflswrar arwaa a1��aw ii�wralw� aww i- - - aa•lr as I.On •as1al flay altli a MANE Asa Y m W%ft. Mar a.a. MUM!aN - a .+,.a.►.area lea.m L t•saga w Y w wom •alai Iraw r ar1Ai slaw a I age fi ■ Gulk�flaa air'rlla04��. aa�l__- •o--. -:rJ •.Ua. •w..wp t .•laa$"V ors Na mM A.f l6 •. 4, Rala Irma a..--.A a!4=0&far a a,aal-llaatw Ara a as wrrs.Asa.sower=a sal- - a•I� t�arras somas • :�•• •...•� ra•.r V rw Ara sfa.w•aI R•iL aver r arli- a•alfa wawa aa.aaw•. alRi 31P•Y oar IIrI S6 �!L t araYa r�sa awlwara r a�w as ���mYa .•war- w•-„-`� - �- - a'1- a ; r r�rt rr ,war.rr••atom a rwr ta, .ram as-omIm-wo mas ras.w.7V• ya a.•.al r.swear-a A so-so& -As r _r"- +"a - a•-a+r••.a •A a.r ar a Ill.I.a l Y is sal•-on MlWbsL w A,assata a m slow 'MAIN s.a.art aw'am aww af a Y. asrr ar - - +- it 'a r u.aalaa war vela - •r- � - F Ami as ammo awarsY raw limas faag,a/aa a• ci 'no'—it3 �- E y r ewrwi !341 C0 D SIUr11AS. M 10 CM40 stalt"s WLr } a a +lI satica. l tr 7 fwT1al0a Ras180- Im"fYL COLOMO 0001141010 C r mono 11t.t• a s t 0000 1a1—, 421a1►a11R sla14 FI414-. - RaS7,9 %we wl011tb UCi SibaG( Dw: R1MOC& 14411A ra mftm6 tHtta. t/hG Srbgw.. 1 moot: slats: rstlnu: ts.ao. tLaLK.aat -18 TrsrmaFa •L VIP," 11O14t. !rt-Cacwhis Al L_. t!alw fifth.[. 1 awo AY4T- i s L .sloe MIT- 7 s L W-V" T! .36 1 \ mpLi ?min ] • • a[naLa► wowT111� 10 s11U'.�LF CLtlt t; llLy[I�t, OIIk�SItF io"Ift Swr<< ce - j iy OVAU v=*•aS[la: t a II moM falksa Ai1M I a • lalm- s c.•r.1oa .Lasree 'Meg-eurs': IY a IY: rtmelw to tI►TC- T•ar:aL 211Ca100 PLASM. IWAR El E MTM New sm UFFT ROW Lj 1 I 1 I 1 1 i • I I 1 I i 11 � i 1 I if I� �I . t . Ili •� 11 I _ y r 16 N�I .'alas—mop. "soon fli:XL, ! r � 1 ► i Z a pop r � sii�rirsl��P"��It�■ � I It► t� loss..V 9 f t .,y M .J ol 4 ISO 1-0110� 00 r mid ...,.. F � .i ram♦ J ��� _�� fuller f WOMEN0 lK C no jig >� _ rMwr�r . f Tj'��Y'�,ny`�r��'t rlx�r y��� � 'yT Li�t.' t l�M� � ����.� �.. 'r�'1 .'-i +t � �•. � � � - iC�... {;, �� •� r+' ;r�. ', r�o 1� r , .Y �� rh r r�. y '�I,,+n i � '; .�. eye`r;u:`..'�1,`/��� '� ,",•�,�;�� ���'��•/A3w�r�x41�� ',Yj�i.1'.`7.•�;�,14.'�1�y j�}*, , �'�}•ate^r+ I71, M ••'r',, � ...� , lit, . '/,��•!' ', MIk MUNTINIO I : . 2M."N, VRBET CA21FOf NIA Ala ,I1 •r 3TCole I2 Ragtime Circle ' tiogtoN Beech, CA ga�9 Ci Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its l ar noting •' 40007 18. 1982 granted your appeal to the Pla�nnirrgowission s Itiont of approval imposed on Conditional Exception No. 81-58. Please Contact the Department of Development Services for further in- . � fOO"tion - 5 -6271 . Alicia N. Wentworth Cf Cl#rk ' AM1zC8 s w Jim Patin. Development Services director l } < <TMophue-m. 714IU4Ml , i •i III �Y•r J''ttAl I • \ ;.6fv;' yyss #Lw nt� g>�q�1C�i BY Cil 4Q rCIL �t -!" " �q...,... 1 ' VrA7V CW G1� bt a.r1>>hr tIN,iloueetq of fkttetple Cl CtT* Of HUNTXNOTON BEACHe CITY CLERK , ..._._.,,.,.... � _. �►�o ,w�.. PUBLIC HeARI O -* A*" �N/C.V'W� low, Joann*,& Lo 'rhoaee I%u I m awA at a .imu hamta tissGmW°ems a citim of tlrs UtrW 860%over the op of twaRtyons you%and tMt I mi wt a lily*nor pratwuAW in Ow above satitlsd matter; "1 m 66 pobmbw ONA duo prinwe of tbs !luntingtan Beech Ind. Review a rarer�etpat alprwrnri�vittia�,publWesd to tbs�y d HuntInsteh Bench Omft of Ormpr rasl whleh sovoie er ii published tar the d!a■ti■rtltaa atf kwW wm And IMallivom of a pearral oham- 1 anew ti t�llelr at ap m hcnie mestioasd had s>tsd do has a bead �oAswiptioo Ibt of pWap ouboMbers, ad%hied�+eertpairsr tier beeo aetmWis6d,piiatW and pub- Alwd at WIr►t+rrvsie in fits raid County of Omnps for a prtW seas If aai yur tdrtt the =two, of *hkb the ae wd Is a P rWod aapy, has bran publMW in tip uvular mad ss dw Maur of said srwspapsr, and not in any suppleasent 04".oa Om 4t odog dstse,W J$ridArV It 1482 i aor ft(or dwd nl under ponalty d petjvty that the forepo- WS M true Bad cmr wL D►,sr,t!at A.q l:0 op..0.r9m 4........... .... ..... .. .. .. c tbr;ia ..�.�h.dy►or ..�f.� �. .. r ..w Try::..•`/�I'Ttii.I1'.. . .. . .. . ., y� � Signature •1 77 Old ;'. FOR CITY COUNC1 ACTION Honorable mayor and city Council Charles V. Thompson, City Administrato Jams W. Pslin, Director, Development Service r• I d CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81- 58 (APPRAL OF CO fTIONS OF APPROVAL) Alk- Of b", Reaum IIIwWadon,**Nsk flundkq Source, A km, Amwhnmts STATEi�i�i' -s'tP.. SBTJE: Transmitted for your consideration is Conditional Exception No. 81-58, an appeal of the Planning Cominiss ion' s conditions of ap- proval imposed on Conditional Exception No. 81-58 at the December 15, 1981 Planning Commission meeting. kr The planning Commission and Planning ste x'f recommend that they City COuncil uphold the Commission' s approval of Conditional Ex- caption No. 81-58 w+ th the conditions as imposed by the Planning Commission on December 15, 1981. BJl�ie�C���r hZJ!_MLLAff: Roger Cole 3772 Ragtime Circle Lot 33, Tract 9168 Huntington Eeach, CA ARJP%XQM: Same as above �s To remove the conditions of approval imposed on Conditional Exception No. 81-58 at the December 15, 1981 Planning Commission meeting. LOCATION: The subject property is located on Ragtime Circle, approximately 300 feet south of Sundancer Lane . LUMIFE SN AQTJow 9 CFMIM 1,5i. ,19.01 A NOTION WAS MADE BY PAONE AND SECONDED BY KENErICK To OVERRULE THE BZA DENIAL AND APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-58 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS. �o� kv r 11• f" I0 k3�i 1'+1w1, Y•J.JR(F' ± ' •n04t, v4 P4 0 >.a ••o CZ 81-58 APPMUS Un. 18, 1982 Page 2 ' piscussion toot placs regarding one of this conditions of approval . It was felt that the language describing the material to be used on the cover should he :rore specific. ON NDTION BY BANNISTER MD SECOND E MANA FEY THE ABOVE MOTION X N09D TO INCLUDE "GLASS OR TEMPERED GLASS" AS A DESCRIPTION OF TUB MATERIAL USED ON THE COVER OF THE WINDSCREEN, BY FF.-HE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYESs Bannister, Xenefick, Mahaffey, Winchell WOOS: Paone ABSENT: Porter, Schumacher ABSTAIN: None THE FOLLOWING VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE AMENDED MOTION TO APPROVE CONDIT101 AL EXCEPTION LYO. 81--58 WITH THE FOLLOWING FX,%IDItiGS AND CONDITIONS: FINDINGS 1 . Based can the testimony presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearings, the Commission has determined that the requ irted windscreen will not be detrimental to the public safety and general welfare of the neighborhood or tho cortihnity. 2. Th%i applicant is willing and able to carry out the purposes foi- which the conditional exception is sought and ' is willing to do so without unnecessary delay. . CONDITIONS .FOR APPROVAL: 1. That the height oZ the windscreen shall not: exceed nine (9) feet &L . 2. That the cover of the windscreen be of a light-.weight material (e.g. tempered glass) . 3. One end of the windscreen must have an opening ten (10) feet wide by the height of the windscreen for purposes of ventila- tion. II1 f �MF ' r ii t• CE 81-b 8 APPEAL Jan. 1$, 1902 ` page 3 AYZSs Bannister, Keaefick, Paone, Winche'_1, Mahaffey 11018 x Noma AMENTs Porter, Schumacher ABSTAIN; Nsne DISCUSSION: on September 2, 1981, the Board of Zoning Adjustments denied the x. applicant' s request for the construction of a windscreen ten (10) feet in hAl4t. The windscreen would enclose a► projecting deck over a portion of the balkhead in the rear yard of the subject �`- prcperp:,. The code allows at deck to be roofed with "nonpermanent" Material, with sides not to exceed a height of eight (3) feet, in order to provide protection from the elements for decks. The appli-Cant is proposing a glass or acrylic roofing fur the windscreen in addition to the variation in height. ". They Hoard of Zoning Adjustments denied the applicant' s request ba zed on the following findings : w'•.r. 1 . The code provisions allowing for windscreens did not intend that any sort of closed, habitable room Should result from their instal,i.ation. but only that a screening structure be allowed to protect a deck area. 2. Granting of the conditional exception by the Board of Zoning Adjustments would establish an undesirable precedent. 3. The applicant has failed to demonstrate hardship related to the subject property. Subsequent to the Board of Zoning Adjustments ' denial, of Condi- tional tuception No. 81-58 , the Planning Connission granted the applicant' s appeal with conditions: 1+ Tnat the height of the windscreen shall not exceed nine (9) feet at bulkhead. 2* That she cover of the windscreen be of a light-weight material (e.g. tempered glass) . 3« One and of the windscreen must have an opening ten (10) feet wide by the height of the windscreen for purposes of veatil.a'- tion. I I .Y. �. litr,*w.iyJ,'• , 1u�lkr I�1+�' A', T1{ •'t .y' ,, M•;M1 z 1 •'~ , r, r r" , CI 81-58 APPEAL Jan. 1$ , 1982 - ; Page 4 li4.r. Three conditions reflect the proposed crude amendment to Section 9103.4 (Windscreens) which the Planning Comoirsion reviewed at the December 15 , 1981 planning commission messing. abTR.iMATI" ACTION: The City Council may approve Conditional Exception No. 81-58 without the conditions imposed by the Plarning Commission. This mould allow a windscreen to be constructeI at a ten (10) foot height with all sides enclosed. The City Council may also uphold the Board of Zoning Adjustments denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-58. MVIROWSPITAL STATUS : Pursuant to Section 15103 of the California Environmental Quality Act, this application and request 4.s categorically exempt ando therefore, there is no requirement- for an environmental assess- ment of this j roect. P FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. SUPPOITIN ,;HMPMTI0Mt 1. Letter of appeal dated December 28, 1981 3* Site Plan 3, 6taff report dated October 30, 1981 4. Planning Cnavission minutes dated December 15, 1981 JWPtRSs3h „y'�j Y ` • a. ,r RAJ •. r •,, K � ;N "'. } r . -i. ! + 'l , I I • '� C �` 7�EA}fldrfi•MTs�" r ,+�11 ' ,�is•�,f y'���f 4, 1�. �, . • ,yi! t r'[��., Jgl,_ Y �� 1 r �� IM{T 74q�'r•'!f '' t; •i, i dr ' �f. .M. ',r r Iiwi �j.,.,� r 1 r , � '' •�r ' r � • r ! + 7 f , V L • '.: - "�' •%:fit:i`Ii.,/! '.Mi ' �� .” ` r, .:r ' r . a+• �. r 71, ,. :i1� �,f r...ld', rl'..:� i .• I 'I 1:41 .<111�'j i. ry,, j+l r• Roger C. Cole 3772 Ragtime Circle Huntington Beach , Coo 92649 f December 2691981 �Y' 4 itrgtoed,"Beach' City •Council .r City Hall F bgtaft eactis Ca; Dear Cc rncil Mumbacsi In July of 1981 we submitted plena for a glass windscreen r SC,aur residence. The plans were drawn by Datken Engineering , Inc . as they built the house and are familiar with this type of wind- screen .having built several in the area . We were denied a permit because of the need for a nine (q) Foot height to maintain archive tectUral continuity with the rest of our house. gubsequent:ly , we met With the 8ZA ,were denied , and filed For a conditional exception with the planning commission. After being continued several times use were granted our exception (81 -58) with co."dit4ons. Upon reviewing our Fans we feel, that the canditions defeat the purpose and intent of the windscreen. Our intention was , and is , to cnnserve energy , cut our heating doe•t'n', *aMd ifford a measure of comfort to our deck . 8y building a r:indscFatln Rnnclpsed and covered with ffjlar glass ( tempered glass) an COT fullfill then* arms . tie have meet the requirements fur ventil a-tiUA b-i Orispo$.ing sliding glass doors and louver windows on all Rides ` of qut- ,a0jnc14gr.1en. i .is Oaf fling to us why the Building Crept.. and Planning " Covemi..aafan.. are so ihtetnt on denying us the energy savings and comlta' en dyed qX pinny other residents of the Harbour areae many ef" *MM built: windscreens aired rooms without the need of panditionol exceptionoin view of this and our desire to conserve 'f! resoureee we ask permission to build our windscreen according to plan. 9 . Pe tfully , 00 IV Roes C . Cole ,11 �r J .��! �I •r',+.�y y 'Rig*�'•r i I • / •;`1'�',,+!•1' "�ISi�n.•�l •> MW ' ' 1!1i'�i,'. 'f. •++I�F�y,l,q','y.�'t#��,M,. Jr' .1 !4',' I y, •,'•'1 r, ,,ryry :• R 14" �F y . tmtftWn beach develapmeli services depnrtmont STAf f EPORT TOs Plahning Commission PROW De &rtzont of Develnpment Services p�1 "s ,• October 29C 1901 rid t Roger Cole . DID & ACCEPTED: • 3772 Ragtime Circle 1, September 14 , 1981 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 � I = Same YJg0CFI ..J1 gz PATE: pu bT�� heAP°ingclose of T E. To allow a windscreen to be constructed at a •ten foot g MQ&Lp EIM, DCSIGNAIg: height: in lieu of the code-- Low Density Residential permitted 8 feet. ' EXISTING USE: t &&=;Qw i Subject property is located Single family dwelling :: '• on Ragtime Circle, approxi- mately 300 feet south of ZONE : R1 , Low Density Sundencer Lane. Re:.:idential 1s1�. $UGGESTED ACTION s The staff reco-.wends that the Planning Commission upheld the Board of Zoning Ad justmentc ' denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-S� I.,.• based on the Findings contained in Section 7 . 0. ';,yggSS, 2. G GENERAL INFORMATION: on Septem er Z, 1981 , the Board of Zoning :Adjustments d6nied ' Conditional Exception No. 81--��, a request to Allow a wind- ' soteta to be constructed at a ten (l0) foot height in lieu of the code-permitted eight (0) feet. The decision has been appealed by the applicant. I 3. 0 SUMMARY OF ISSUES: 1. Has the applicant demonstrated a hardship in order to justify' the granting of a conditional exception? M•�Maei� I. r1 x* *,- Tj y +•'!}+,-'4Tfi`'r�!'r.1`}'y16`-IT,���r! �„ . ,,r +��•4�y r n,��� �, I{ti^•':�' •Y• .C1, .^ - ��� / 14, f r i �If I `fly r'f�h i� r , k " W' • ! � -1 y •A Y Y r •�� � �, 4.WY ��. hf lilt w � ' 4 . Q I,RONMf7�'i`AL STA_US: � arr,�wl�llMf �T+pII IIILIYr rursUant to Section 15103 of the California Environmental ' onmenta►1 Quality Act this application and request is categorically exempt and ' therefore, there is no requirement for an environmental assessment.. of thLe project. M'K •l:.•Y, .�PIFl�lu lrrY ri�W. �rw�arr.++�l rY o r�'1r��l1 r• � YI 11�1�� Gioneral Platt Designation: Low Der.airy Residential Zone: R1 Land ''Use= _ Single Plalmily Dwelling RT pF SUBJECT SITE r+` General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zone: Ri Land Use: Single Family Dwelling SOUTV DF SURJZCT SITE ? Genoral Plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zone: R1 Land Use: Single Family Dwelling JAST OF SUBJECT S_TTE General plan Designation: Low Density Residential Zone : R1 Land Use : Single Family Dwelling .!061 OF S+U13JIX BITS W ill 1111+10. General plan D6signation: Low Density Residential. Zonet RI and Use : :ing1v Family Dwelling r , CO O AWS t S : On, Se ter 2# 19911 the Board of Zoning Adi,ustments denied � the aepplicantas request for the construction of a windscreen ten (10) feast in height. The windscreen would enclose a projecting dack over a portion of the bulkhead in the rear yard of the sub- `� Ject property. The code allows a deck to be roofed with "non- permanent" material , with sides not to exceed a height of eight (8) feet in order to provide rx�ection from the glemapts for decks. The applicant is proposing a glass or acrylic rooting or the windscreen in addition to the variation in height. The Board of Zoning Adjustments denied the applicant' s request based on the following findings : 1. The code provisions allowing for windscreens did not intend that any sort of closed, habitable room should result from Y A AIt"T; t� OW 'f a *fin r, M � � •J ( ',� '' � ° rw., �� ,'1f f r k r' ��•:tlrpY1 + ye ►�SWs nr .i ,,�.i .• � . Y V' r 2Q� i9$1 their i"tallationt but. only that a► screening structure be allowed to protect a deck area. 2. Otantinq of the conditional exception by the Board of zoning >' j�jiu� tmmtu would eetoblish an undesirable precedent. 3. The applicant, hss..#nilad to demonstrate hardship related to the subject property# f, y Thev+o a was; ulea�ei' nwus "four denial by the ,board. ,.'r.... The staff has .re,tiewed the applicant' s request and the justifica tion offered for . the conditional - exception and concurs with the board of Zonirmq Adjustments' findings for denial . 7. 0 RE'D tnAT1CN: Rased an. the ttb4va analysis and the fallowing finding, the staff ` r 'recomends that the planning Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 01-58 . FINDING PCR OmmL t The Planning Commission may grant a conditional exception providing for relief from, the strict application of the provisions of section 9830. This standard requirea 3 showing ,of exceptional ciarcum stances, inability to enjoy property rights, that Cie exception ►ul.d not be materially detrimental to the publi':: Y dalth, safety and welfare or injurious to the surrounding area►, and that the appli- ca►.nt, is milling and able to proceed with the project without unnec-- ee101I delay (9832 .1, 9832.2) . 1. Exceptional uirc=stamcev do not apply that - deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed on other properties, in the vicinity. ,. Cthex properties' under the same zone classification and circum- stances have not been granted the privilege of a windscreen ten (10) � feet in height. Attachinnts: 1. Area Map `.c 2. Letter of appeal from the applicant, received and dated September 14, 1981 I 3. 141nuites ,of the .HZA meeting of September 2, 1981 4# Site Plan trd!! � •.�r'1 rr� � � � yam, �t r i , • r 0. broom. • ; y'y �J AF-- .r / .-" .,- I r y yr rr�+r+�• Vft 401 Apt -4or �l • �r p ,W A, W eofk, 1 rk, f !F t o.• f �� 7 iY •n� 1 .•,l'' k . ,' .nl� � , r *.'.wn'• 1 d l •, y «a, aftwo ate'• �� n,"'�'" � ' ' -a;r • ' . . , nl�i�. ��il�t 1�i�i .�.�,J�,,"• ' •4,t1 '.l"�a, �y ..1! .,t ^,lN y . ",� t•, c,• MINUTES OUNTINGTO14 BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION Council Chambers Civic Center 2000 Main Street Y , Huntington Beach, California DZC1RGZR. 15. 1981 , 7xQ5 PH StQN : Kenefick, Bannister, Paone, Winchell, Porter, Mahaffey 2= 3=10M Mom,: Schumacher C LL C1. rt Winchell requested that the Minutes of the meeting of Decombox 1, 1991, be changed to reflect a "no" vote for her and a "yes" vote for Commissioner Porter at the top of page 7, regarding CVP'• 81- 25 • and TT 41b03 ' submitted by R & R Investments. Commissioner Kenefick also requested that the minutes of the November 17, 1981 meeting show a change. Commissioner Schumacher, and not herself, seconded the motion on Conformance to General Plate 81 -12 . The change was reflected, ors the bottom of page 1. Ott NOTION DY KENEFYCK AND SECOND BY BANNISTER T&; . CONSENT CALENDAR, CONSISTINC3 OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 1, 1981 An NOVEMBER 17, 1981, WITH THE ABOVE CHANGES, AND EXPANSION OF A NON-COMPORMING USE, WAS APFROVED BY THE FOLLOWING V'OTEt AYE$ r *Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Mahaffey ABS#NT: • Schumacher, Paon e, porter � ABSTAIN: Bannister* (abstained from minutes of 11-17-81) CCNpiTlONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-58 (Appeal) (Continued from 11-17-81) A regoest to allow a windscreen to be: constructed at a ten foot height in lieu of the code-permitted eight feet. Subject property is located on Ragtime Circle approximately 300 feet south of Suhdancer Lane. Comiaissloner Kenefick stated that although, she has abstained from voting on this issue in the Fast, she has nuw listened to the tapes and will be eligible to vote. Commissioner Mahaffey also listened to the tapes and is eligible to vote. ' y�I'P+.b`rj `r� T�I r,1 iY i•',, P 9 ' • n , I" 4 1 I. ° � ry�J..� '• � `M � � •• ! 1 k 1F`li.' � + �� • M77'd;''�rY" 1, '.'f`7'�m{ � . '��1;..i.' i� 'r. ly, v a toot I.N. pla - ng coaniiision Dour 150 1981 race Z w The public hearing was opened. Seeing that no one came forward to address thin issuer the bearing was closed. Camissi.on wao. basically co ce'rr�ned wits the fact that this would eppem"f. to, a habitable rom an proposed, thereforet one of the dox4jtUms of approval would be to leave one and of the windscreen ;W • Also g4estioa*4 was the material to be used for the cover. +posed.'materi.a�l alas tempered glass. Commissi+aner$ requested that the conditions specifically estate "glass or tempered glass" as an ex ►1e of 110bt-woL9ht material" . A WOTION WAS MADE. BY MP►,WFEY AND SECONDED BY BANNISTER TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL .,LXCEPTION go. 81- 58. TH!S NOTION rAIL9D BY THE FOLU MINa VOTIC: f'. AYESx Bannister# Kenefick, Mahaffey NMI Panne, Wirichel l ANSENTt Porteer, Schumacher .'►813',i'A1N: pone . t Fger, , Deputy City Attorney, advised the Commission that already r issue sue has been ' befor a them many times and could show no Clue process, y A MDI= MS MW BY PANE AND SEC== BY KMWICK TO MFYt UME THE BZA 17 =L AND APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 814-58 WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITXONS . � Discussion toot place regarding one of the conditions of approval . It was felt that light-weight material to be used on the cover be more specific langu+age�wise. j I ON NOTION BY BANNISTER AND SECOND BY MAHAFFEY THE ABOVE MOTION WAS AHMED TO INCLUDE "GLASS OR TEMPERED GLASS" AS A DESCRIPTION OF THIS HATCRIAL USED ON THE COVER OF THE WINDSCREEN, BY THE FOLLOWING VoTE: AYESa Bannister, Kenefick, Mahaffey, Winchell DES t Paone AMSEW: Porter, • Schumacher i ABSTAIN: None THE 1`OLLOWING VOTE WAS TAKEN ON THE AMENDED MOTION TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-58 WITH THE eOLLOWING FINDINGS ANL CONDITIONS : 1 . Based on testimony presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing$, theCommission has determined that the requested I -2- 12-15-81 - P.C. .. - ----,, if ! �r� �y+� ��*G'h�� '� i � +� � J�Y1 4 ��'r'^ S b•_ �Y ��w, �r��*" . } , ���� �j1 �, � ��,�1rJa�yh "'F s�, kd ���+1�� � �� J.,..^I'�ti'w�h'•���t+1 •� �"d� �a � � h r (, MA +wi :r, �,�,; �r1 �� , , ! Y$$ � } r .� �.�. �,� �•. P,..�Y"i�rW �. f 'l•7�i1114�� , Y �12 r `?�u,�; r,.'., N�YT J�'�r�.7Y�:,� ' :yr1.l,� k'� "� �"'r� ,►. , Cu,�� '+il Y + •+��r :w ' Z,wf lr�'_ r L�1r��,w�;F yl6li�N�-, ,�� •r �•� ,� T � 4 � N r � (S •'r�'""' ,� } ` '.i�t�' ++ y T ,�'y ( 5R 94ir • q,. ;�r✓r . '�'/y�`r r^ .� t''+}� 1�,�t'ir "�N4y,^^1wP.tiMlM�.j�l�.�'6h+�R0'� "i�Y�l.f7l`�. •ti•.�7�'{!�'�� - }P'i�i{>r„�•�'�ppr r,�4' ,�. -,. � � , t:' .4.. ,�`aN. w "not Alan 4 Q Colmission vagd 3 ' win4sc reen will not be detrimental to the public health, safety � .i?. and general welfare of the neighborhood or the community. A�M 2. 40plicant is willing ail able to carry out the purposes for wMeh the aooditional "extaption is aou;ht and is Milling to do w,..'. OW thcut 0"011 xy 40lay s t the. height of the wirAsclreen shall not- exceed nine (9) feat. 2, that the cover of the windscreen be of a light-.weight material Io,g tempered glass) . -Q" end of the windscreen must have an opening ton (10) feet w1de by the height of the windscreen for parposes of ventilation and light. Bannister,' Ken4fich, Paone, Winchell, Mahaffey None =TAIR: poitero Schumacher None r., r • `i ' T 1 i T ,r M v,Mt r� "� r, w ' ' • , ..• ,`i'I�,�,r, .S�A E . � i�' � rjy" f � �r •W.. �°''yrA W � ti � •i y, y��,�l :�'• "", l � 1> ,' T�F''i, ^�:,� '•T. ,,,/ Syy ' �wrtL!r 1 �, �' y "' ;. elAl J r ,e 1 �f�`4�t1�♦a":•;r« n••nlh,`!,4" �•, rMu , ;:vim"y,, ., ,a.,,.:,r,r,.'•'a. ., ,,� ri r ,ter( /•'LRr / Publish > -82 J' rM •, i! r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPM TO THE FLAMING. C ISSIr/NIBS CONDITIONS OF APPIh111AL ON C M Ir:ONAL EXCEPTION 81 ICE ib NEMY GIVEN that a public hearing will be hu1S by the City Council of Of CIV Of IUntinOton Beath, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, tir4ton Mach, at the hour of P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on 1►bndav the ISO da0► of Janua 19 .•• AZ — for the purpose of considering an appeal of the Planning Commission's conditions of approval igwsed on Conditional Exteation No. 81-58 at the December 15, 1981 FlarAlrol Commission NMeting. The subject property is located on Ragtime Circle, approximately 300 feet south of Sundancer Lane in the R1 (Low Density Residential ) 01strict+ A legal description is on file in the Department of Development Services 0ffice. �A. 4 i+ All Interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinion for or against said aepeal Further informtion may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2O00 Main Street, MWntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 0ATE0 1-4"82 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk k r o#o M"I LN" WRICS AM a VMblic hearing Will bO IMILIN AW4 set= "0 City of Runtimmon &Wcftj )io G 0, 01. PAJ 5 VO #OP?AO1/00064. r /"�'c ,fieV rl -nr- 0 /Y/V 16 6 eJ 1-fr& I PAJ 44,Arl W,#Oe-(5 X AL I$ toy. . e-s 1,oenoi frot 4060W� DeI7 Mill be hold at the hoUr of On in the Council ChaLbers Building of the m "oil 1 �40 066kftip, 2000 Min 9treeto ftntington Seacho California. M sated persons are invited to attend said hearing and or 499iftst the proposed VA per 149omation may be obtained frcma the City Plwminq I' I' Sphipsk no. (714) 536-5271 Mm this day of CITY PLANNING COMISSION BY 1 �.��� 1T'�•` `rq' -�1..It, >�� *.•1 I, .���'��.�� � ������ �,�T r!`�"y��\�'4 ip�. ,•A�'��, .\,��i �Er t J..�� ;�. * �, ,��1��•.. , r� � ,.t.�},�' � � � � „ .� �� f 1 , 6 f5�l�l 1 .,,..,.. � }y 1�• � ,�a �• � ^� t' ��•+!f'�:� � r �w�r d'•��r�� "t���,�� ''' r '. � ';• ;��'J'�'�.��•��I�T'dy:'1�. •,', �'r.,J •••� ''.�1•��,�{i,r(•' '• { � 1 �,.• 1,,, � f,�;' rO� 4.1 � � r ,� �'���r i.l�F�� ? � fit[ r' v7 r °! � � • � � � �. .\ : ! f. 1 :r ��f1,1 .IF r.' �,.,h.'•:t►•ear (A � M Nyltl r•,, r r� o�sAy6�t�,4 ♦. 1l'Fti..'.i�vl:'d ryu;r.r�:•'r'�'M/?�kr�1 i�:da►1:�• '��4.:.• �• .�, r 1 ,yy �A . WrICR TO CISM TO SCHWWA PUBLIC HZAR1Nv r not j 14c.6 kV4 fk�;,• � "` A " Y1MN A1?I1C t,Si`,/1L x '� . �yl y�y AT or r Alp rsr attaew V00, rltl`� will follow. • j Na APIe 1 s.,# ,r ,1 tattiated by: ; . Pia®ice Comisrion Planning Departsont ' I Patition App"l ... Ott A&Vtiou of XuVIroommotal Status (a) YES d0 NOW, i Pluriein6 Aeparts"t Sxtenstoa d b .. . r�. • •fad a�iSI iafatiaa. I if &jMM1v ploase tranmult exact warding to he required in this legal . i i i I 1 I 1 i- - _ - - - - - _ - _ _ _ _.., _ _ _ - -, - _ - _ so 17, 6 ; "al Ja9tift CilwAs � 1A skah C" i I li+i4f Iasah, Caul I - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _. - . 17"36-4 i l ':- l•�l i 176-Ul-/0 M 1 ► .? i l26+t� Aw■ , C1lt,� i duatlEoer , 0111! � q ; �d F GLOOMI i�b Maur a+630 Idea Cfad44 1 � �� ' P.O. Sm 2234 Mau �at�, t#1.�I ; �, all! i ftacho od i Saw !3"7 170491-42 Jtwa D Acn* at JU C�11 : X -u tb L YAra M E 1r M Aft tom C1XCIa t is� f otw .iL 3792 no me !�! t4 �1t , ' tbLit Y7i1-4 i I<is'i t I d D ifxi i Duods D White 16251 y Cixs 1 1'i' 2?S2 map r C. tla 92iA!IOWU mrr sus01�, C .i! Z ! ! I� -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ wiftwon C Wi9d a /C 1�1J1i�1 M dill . l$ "ARMY. CI=34 IS= NMk*wW JAM I JAM Owzknn Lsw I ' - - - - - - ----- - - - - - - - -- T-- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - 1 - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - -- 17"3-21 1 17!-W36 IL7@-"1-47 j I I - 17"36-7 1i lam. 1 OLQK'f 1 =zw AWSMI r Li272raw Yrus I �/4!'�lz"�,t,�d We Ilr�aw� Afts3N C"a 1 *Aavtm bodhe C"U Y.0 . He 1761 af1� 1��0 1 11 �� ; Z7�-iAl- r�a i Isis J6 tslq■b I TIlAided XsUwd limmmCgi paw ' fit *Now* Drum I 17M N�1r 04%s ' P.O. am ILM Corr ftN24 Cyr I I _ _ - ., _ _ _ - _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - _ - - 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - 1 ( I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I F yp� Z i I I I r I I I I ( t I � 178-i611 5i �DAUM t C# 1 61-54 BUT 3377+62 ftwumu Cola i . 17, 3692 Aquarium Drive 9 9 � NOWN OkU i i 92649 BM:N Oalf . - _ - _ _ - - _ _ w _ .. _ _ .. _ - .. _ _ _ -i- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - -�- - - - .. - - - - - - - - .. - - - - . - - - - - 170-i��l 17�-�a�-o�► , ��e�-os AbetM _ �7i om"C C t�tCrivr>� 1i292 �c Lwa ; 3 Atpw Rive kpsrt.�r it8 1 m:h C&.i•f somah, caw 8mah, t'3~Uf 92+649 --.a-- - - - - - r - .- - - - - - - r - --_ 17#b91-0 170412-10 1 - 170-40-% On= L Asms 3752 m 6 lxi�r i Wive 1 =2,Nqu --- LtiCive I 92 9 �► 8ww-ti, Wit � 91r�49 beach* C�1if o 92649 d�ia, Calif - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � _ - _ __ .. . ww - - _ - - - - - - - - _ .- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - 17�1"'iY,>�1t2 170"'i0�111 1 - 17"83~-0 t` is 3r a■=ws It Slurp ' ftatw J Otlaw ki 37i2 ftmompe ArIvf 3691 Pirate Cola y '6!► ltt ldati, Calif i 9 9 4 Cali l i.E 92b4 dun , C" y 1 . w _ + _ _ .� — — _ w w .w_ _ a•. -a_. — _ w _f—_. —r — — — w — — — — __ _ — — -. — — —,— — —I— — — — — — — —— — — — — — — -. — — _ — -. _ • 176-683-0 I ui�iiwy it llusrt I%= AruturJan of al i JAM j V 16242 Nilarl Lam , 16291 Llwp 1 3w Pinata Cunl'A Hu Ciro Dow*,ow*, Oil ' kk li!, Ca � 8urttljWtxan bac-h, CLU ` 92649 ; 92649 i 92649 _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - _ _ w - -- _ - - - _ 1- _ - _ w - _ - _ _ 17i1-16►62,-Q6 ; 170-8i 13 i 170--691-01 17�i -Q6 1 E 4 ft Q*XqG Selloom D LAM V M7cift 16381 Lamle 1 16212 8ur�drr�r Lane s, Cal it Dutch, C7 LW 16, ►2 cal Ruch, Calif 92619 92649 , 92649 _ .a 17�-4>8r 0i - i - _I- 1T$-602-1i 178-691--02 ' itl�lc' ,T Guth' t � �Y>Iwat � Aurt�l 1 � J1u<,�t><sk .� 16262 PAmo LL Ia.m , 16271 Surma tare 1 16352 L,tp buntIngtom Much, C'.aW M and *mKt4 4:4.11 ; mmajiNtm lmoch, Calf! � � L 92649 1 926419 170-M-�07 i `l7"2- _ _ r _ _ �. _ - _ - _ - - r -15 17W491-03 Sam G ftit'h 1 Ir ldWWl a VOY ' ltlu�old S l�+alUing w ' 16272 Rawl C�]t 16 8w ]Lam ; 3741 Mlabli Cimle i 1i9 CYIif i 8 , Coli! Nu kt nvton b*K h, Cali 926 1 92649 , 92649 � . •1�1r-iY i Y7r-6�1 -Ql 17"91-.04 -- fat 3�■S q r3q Mrlat B 0d �lh�c' 1 A.1it wwd K Ashby LOU2 Meml Law 1 3652 As j%wUn Mtvw ! 3751 NlodAle Citcle l�1 , Cam! ' 92649 92649 C; Rack LW + Htaatfn,�b►an oftbch, Calif i 1 92649 — — r — — — — — — — — — .� r — _ — — ... — —. - . _ —• — - _ .- _ 4 1 I ' � 1 ' ( I I ' 1 ' ( J s 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! - rra• .. ... rr ... •.. T ram .. r --y, rr� .► wr .► r •r w►v srrrti rr M •r rrf : rr r r rr rrrrM! _ s ... rrrrr 1 f 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 f •. .. - .. . . r w r . rr r _ a+ .r rlr w•rr .r. r• r .. w. � ... ... r. r r r .. .. w r w w r ' .. . r . .. .. r r r • r � e.r I f � 1 I I I 1 1 ! 1 1 ! 1 r . . . . � .. .. .. w �..� r .. -, �. r_. ... .._rT .. rry. .. r_�._ _ ,,,..�. 1 ,r ,..�_.. .. .. � ... r �r _�. �. rT � .. . 1 I 1 I � I I 1 ! I 1 I . ! 1 1 I _ r r r • _ _ r - r r 7 r r w r r T- r i -_ L�. r w, r r •� r r�►r r_ +. .� r a Y. r.w�.�..,.r � r r r � r r�. w.r w. 1r rw T r W V•a M r r � y 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 r - .w r _- .-r r r _ - r r r r r r. - r r-- }- - r .- .. r r r - r w. .- - r -- r r -- : r r f r� I 1 ivy 1 y • r•r r Vw r r r ti r .f r ww r.•-.r _ r w.� r err r r r _ _ r w - - T w r r—•r r — r r r r r. r w► r r r.A 1 1 ;, Film 1 I Mn it r - r r - - - r - .- - .. r w• - - - - r w w r r r - - - r r r - .- - - - r. - - r w - r. r r - - - r 1 1 4n=- Ices v w►•! r r r •111 M - r - r r - -r - .- T r - - - r l r r L r .w 7 � r---r r r r r ./r _T _ r r r.�.Y Fw r r r r.•1•r r r . r -. .r w -. r - r r - w _ w - r r r r. - r - M r ,.- - -. r r - r r r _ - .. _ r ••- r r .- - r r r wl - - - - - - - - - - TM SIT '4f imomki =VAN an r K-T" N I r Y T -+ --w w. .- - T r -. _ - -_ - -. _ - -. r - .- r r wl r w w - - w. r r -. .- r r r -. _ - r r .r - w.•.rp I I Vh 1 I I ( 1, 1 W,, a= Superior Court i nr•rtttK Jay Cx'1 y_ Ct7U WAT80F CAI.lFORNIA C11L In wnd fur the County of Orange ' r I PAL 1111) 10*"OFAWWWM . CITY CLE$ CY.'rY OF HUNTINGTON REACH r CITY CLERK Hearing CM-18 � "Mete of Calif imrib i � Crnrnty,tif t'�sry'a ►"e• Jeannie Lo Thomas i 14rat I arty arW at all times herein mentioned was a St ire.n of Um United Metes,over the apt of twenty-one yens,and that 1 • am not a patty u.vmw interested in the Phove entitled matter., owe I sae the principal clerk of the printer of the Hointington Beach Ind. ROVIOW a m.•wpaper ofpetwral circulation,published in the City of Hantinetton 8e4ch County of Ot+rW and which newrpaper is published for the diietminatkm of local nears and intolliger!ce of a general charac- tn, and which ewwsoaper at. all titnes hareln mentioned had and mill has a bona lido subaatiption list of payinj auhecriba;i. W which erewnpapw has been established, printed And puh- li" at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for a period vzoWlas one Sear, that tie notice, of which the a)nezed In i prinW cagy, hu been published In the reirular on .mire issue of said newspaper,and not in any supplement thence,on the falkming dater.to wit» September 24+ 1901 1 amity car deec rs) urAW perrwahy of Perim that the fa►elto- il9 k tree and ta~. Voted at, -IRO. OM It,At.f............ ........... i t�ipes.tser. i � I fear.e•�_..y_ __Y . li I Lloyd Mary • ? 16265 Les Cumbross Whittier, Calif. 50603 Id 16 ILI i 1 � , F. ; — ✓, ' ,s REQUES i FOR PITY CCOUNCIL ACTiON Date September 21 , 1981 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council ' 7 Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administratorj i Prepared by. James W. Palin, Director of Development Servicesk4li t; REFERRAL OF AN APPEAL To THE PLANNING COMMISSIONIAL OF CONDITIONAL FXCEPTIONS 81--17 AND 81-18 9mmi mt of hm, t vvwv .wwbtlon, Analysh, Funding Source, AtU rnetiw Actim, Attachmocrt:: STAT ENT 2E__LS_dUE : Transmitted for the Cuunrilla consideration is the Planning Com-- mi.esion' s action taken on the referral of an appeal of the Planning Commission' s denial on Conditional Exceptions 81-17 and 81-18 . These applications are a request to allow the construction of single family dwellings in the Townlot area with a double-zero side yard setback. And to also allow an increase over the allowed 30% site coverage to 56% site coverage. II RZCOj lEtM OK t T_;ie Planning Commission recommended that the City Council uphold its original denial of Conditional Exceptions 81-17 and 81-18 with the findings as outlined under the Analysis Section of t,hi3 rersort . APPELLANT: ^obert L. Corona 7308 Center Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 APPLICANTt Coruna Development Company, Inc. 7308 Center Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 LOCATION: Southeast corner of 18th Street and Orange Avenue and southeast corner of 11th Street and Olive ` Avenue. REgUESTt To permit a portion of the main building to be constructed with zero side yard setbacks on both sides and to allow an increase in the permitted Yet coverage from 50% to 56% . '.L�L� , COMMIsstoN H- ON_ _d�1G2ST, 18,4 1981 : A NOTION WAS t4ADR BY PRONE AND SECONDED BY SCHUMACHER TO RECOMMEND t TO THE CITY COUNCIL A DENIAL WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE t NOW 1 CE 81- 17 81-18 Page 2 AYES: Bannister, Paone, Winchell , Porter, Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: Kenefick, Mahaffey ABSTAIN: None EI N.DINQS FOR j7ENIAL: 1 . Since the Townlot Specific Plan allows for individual detached units on a zero lotline development on 25 foot lots in the Irownlot area, there is no exceptional circumstance unique to the Ynetitioned -)roperty that deprives it of privileges normal- ly enjoyed. 2. Since the Townlat Specific Plan allows for zero lotline develop- gent with a minimum of five foot separation between every other unit, the granting c£ this conditional exception would consti- tute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with normal limitations . 3. The Townlot Specific Plan allows for the development of these individual 25 foot lots, therefore, this conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substan+4al property rights . DISUNION:. At the April 7. 1981 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Com- mission denied Conditional Exceptions 81-17 and 81-18, a request to ` allow the construction of single family dwellings in the Townlot area built with a Zero side yard setback on both sides of interior late. The applicant was requesting to allow the development of a four unit project:, each unit on an individual 25 foot lot, having common wells along the property lines between each .-ref the units. The center two units would have a zero lotline setback on both sides of the property. This, in essence, would create a four unit at- tached project . The applicant also lied requested that the permitted site coverage be increased from 50% to 56%. After considerable discussion, the Planning Commission denied this request barred on the fact that the applicant had failed to demonstrate a hardship in that there were no uniq►ie cir:umstances related to the property that deprived the property owner frr-ot normally enjoyed property rights. The applicant appealled this decision tr.; the City Council and at the May M, 1981 City Council meeting, the Council considered this appeal. At that time the City Council referred both Conditional Exceptions 81-17 and 81-18 back to the Planning Commission to be heard in conjunction with Code Amendment 91-.5 . The Council directed staff to prepare a revision to Code Amendment 81 .5 which would allow a double zero side yard concept in the Townlot Specific ci: 81-17 & 81-18 Page 3 Elan area . Code Amendment 81-5 iE an amendment to the Townlot and Oldtowrn Specific Plans which clarified and resolved a number of minor problems within these two ordinance code sections . The staff prepared an addendum to Code Amendment 81-5 which de- veloped provisions for a double zero side yard concept in the Townlot area . After considerable discussion anc{ a number of public hearings by the Plarininq Commission, the Corrunission approved Code Amendment 81-5, however, it tabled the portion of the amendment ` which dealt with tho double zero side yard concept . The Planning Commission felt that this concept was not a viable development al- ternative for the Townlot area. This co0e amendment has been scheduled for the Council ' s review at the September 21 , 1981 City Council meeting. Based on the fact that the Commission had tabled the portion of Code Amendment 81-5 which would have allowed the rouble zero side yard concept and further that the Commission could not find a hardship related to the land, the Commission voted to recommend to the City Council that their previous action of denial be upheld a.-4 that these two conditional exceptions be denied by the City Council. Pursuant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the requested conditional exceptions are a Class 5 categorical exemption . FUND' .SO R(' Not app? icable. The City Counr.il may consider overturning the Planning Conw ission ' s original denial of these two conditional excep ions and its subse- quent recommendation for the Council to deny these conditional exception& and approve conditional Exceptions 81-17 and 81-18 . The City Council may also consider the re-advertising and holding an additional public hearing on these conditional !exceptions . SMEPOUIN ZNEQNWibNs 1 . City Council Transmittal dated April 24, 1981 2. Planning Commission Etaff Reports dated April 7, 1901 JWP:SRtj1m 11 ..l& I (714) 894.7f41 ) $94.7542 • (r l 4) 04-7.g4.1 --�... �• .ij� I�G#' 730R Center DriN. a ESNnri►.qhm &,a(b, Cal/*)Mid 9264 IV HMN isviltm Bah It Can" Cn1w • Wrsinvinsrrr • Vista + h6opmill « Rwlra Nwrk Hid YM41 • Hentrr n R inrrsidr +� Srrn &�rnrdicr�� Sri 1 la r 19811 _ pwntington Deac:h City Council on P, a. am 190 .0 star the CA 92648 hers 11 Ift ra of the City Council& IN um lira evnditional, xaception no. 81-17 go. 91-18. Our appeal is based upon the interpretation of r,&wnlot 6peailic Vicar -- Ar" (one. Article 935. Paragraph 09356.4, sub Parngra;h (ii) in the last eentows, which we have not beer, able to receive Interpretation of thin paragraph from the rlannirq r.:Vartmnt. it is the te .lir q of our attorney and mrwriveo ttrat this line allows giro lot line coustruaction. Me plan to d3eams this with the City Attorneys GaiV xutton as sash Abe r ma frm vacation. Pre"Mat, Oorona Development Co. • d 0700Powl- III a 1 M `( Y 1 +` INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION of �rw�raw r�tr Td Charles W. Thompson' v r From James W. Paiin, Director City Administrator Development Services Subject SUPPLEMLZU: 1 rdN ON ate April 30, 1981 AGENDA 81--17 AND D2 ( - Attached herewith is a letter from Corona Development company, which has been filed pursuant to a meeting held with Mr . Corona, Gail Hutton and myaolf on April 27 . The purpose of that meeting was to discuss an interpretation of the To clot Specific Plan development standards, at which time I in4icated to Mr . Corona that I would concur with a referral back to the Manning Commission of these two conditional ex- ceptions subject: to the Commission' s concurrent review of an amendment � to the Townlot Specific Plan. This amendment would propose allowing zero-to-sezo construction. However, the letter goes beyond that point � and stipulates that it had been Mr . Corona's understanding that hie variances would be granted . The Department of Developsmnt services cannot concur with that statement, nor should the City Council mandate an approval by the Planning Commission for these applications should they be referred back to that body. I have attempted) to contact Mr. Coronas on this subject mince recetivinq his letter's however,, he is out of mown and as of the preparation of this communication no contact with him has been made., Therefore I would only concur with a referral back to the Planning Comm.tsaion after Mr . Corona acknowledges that the decision Is at matter of determination of fact to be made by the planning Camission, as that body is an autcnnmaus commission and at decision should not be mandated upon them. I should also note that berth the Attorney 's office and Development Services in riviawring these requests felt that the variance they ask for goes koy:)rd parity and would, in fact, be a grant of special privi- lego. The Council, therefore, might have a difficult time finding the necessary haNrdshiP for approval . I .Mill be preparf0to discuss this further with the Council at its y 4 , 1981 meeting . xdf F bta►chwent 6 Y VON i � I • I 141 S'O 1 i 4 l �.' • i . i Jhu►►►rr1► r► �c,«li • GaUkft Grove • 1 '1•1.1 • uarll + k►�ol► ' h'►.�k l ilip►r ,�J • I b rrav M Nti rciclt + X104 Ffc'rilardir►.c « 20, 1 Val .' o rp►taa 2w AbLA $treat �t •cWAM AMU •446rr 8 4 C-i 9.2648 liso. go" Illurtton., CLAJO AIR 19 fti va6'&ift1p with J?,Obor4 Am Corwr, Pr..&t,dvr�t 10. 0080190 Cc Pon& 3%veLc rat C'ompapMi. -P^cv , *r 4A 2IP OA AM 900 QED As, It, at Vm of#&a& of Vw C *Aorow* Pr r�rrrt r l)o!►ort to& Ceara., h" 6 PO&L%$ Ratcoa &qW sr* of Ow CLAV AVWro 6 44 of f sub j oett: PrOJAM" 64AA "ad 40 RVAIGAMt Cora", cocated at Mtn, Urort ww O"W" wwd • 6sar► d�r��d b� #lea Pl.�i.� t'4wa1A�.rw b�r�6 o f # CoorwL b LAS_006 caevra r tom. rroaao�r%, OV t wry► Ln► f awo w of UO p r o f �►rorrdr Yhat, !r Robert Am Corona# of Cor m hwai"O rt. C , i Am , 10 rd And 4"thatt6�.►#..' r s o� woo" wofe U be W%f�rrred 6ek to UM P'+ infti4 Ci.or. for V6rrtra++aarrowt, 6 +r�►ow t1�►s CLtM �' �MM+rt�t . r. A*4' r (.iAo A "^d &^t, wh4xA wou" attow F;lro-tc-Zara 44 Afto -I t Utopoottt of the pro„iarto Cm tks lowntot area. �t :.e► w4upww4tood that fiJws var"^" W"t ba pre"ej tamd that b#A tdany parftL" WILU bo i. wd b4LfOr46 trot ce�dopt&t4oft of OAM&A ZOMAP Cod4 A6wwr, •tto by tJta G`Lty. to l,t h t of the fowAtAet the A roja0r,. s WUA b w 4^ a¢r�.f o roor►e s W�Lt k fi t of tho tc-ba-adopted Mt# Zo�� .�rt�da�n� of Ua�dLorrrcos. ,fit t� �� +r•d#ra�tood tlt�rt #ho OrdL�an�a A�wro�td�+r�+►t, wLt.0 aerd.f lo tAs LAo of 44 eavajn*o. 9h& Cat caww s 4A6" d"a,4s►� A d.o a M444 ^0 �t the -4&tsr fawt of �1saaAar wi•tl► Arr. pa&^# Are 40oL Lr, tWO r4lpr6 4bP&t0#AL,vdWL of the end mmeb of f. J# La air x the4444 oovaros car4.f Zti�as wa4 &Uw a 50% j fLtt# pr.ra+vsV t oo4or4^t at an* es i ��i"► home �14*0 and ort -W with a 10 I tar► 1 cavamps for a+rri UAWAur pra$"uAm *WWh " bay a►" ow& ta""d isn r t h e1 G�bova #red&, s f4,4re#Aeco*+r the a;b$setAms 4& Chat 40% (forte ,,•►arrortxl o t" r opine. &W www~ed two art:,# pc,&%t 24 n (bro%tv, four ;,r►c�.o/ a�va proms t�o tlta alb. w � �• • o (.'opro ►a 3*v Jhce REOUEb t FOR CITY COUNCIL. ACTION 4 I D`te April 24, 1981 swmi"M to: Honorable Mayor and City Council 9ub-,nMvdP by: Charlej W. 'Thompson, City Administrators_ (� rnrarw by: Department of Development Services I 9ubim: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION Nn.( 81-•17 r /� y,,��� �1,of IS",, A� / b, Fund* ��, A M Aetkm,AtaWhrrunts• .. r Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal to Conditional i Exception No,. 81 -17, a request to permit a ' 0 ' side yard set-- back on both mides of 25 ft. lots in the Townlot area and to allow an increase in the maximum lot coverage from 50 - 56 percent. Blom Tho Planning Commission and Planning Staff recoiinnends that the city Couynvil uphold the Planning Commission' s denial of Con- ditional Exception No . 81-17 . Appellant; Robert L. Corona 7306 Center Drive Huntington Beach, Calif. 92647 ?applicant: corona Development Company, Inc . 7308 Cnnter Drive Hur.-_ tngton Beach, Calif. 72647 Locations Southeast corner of llth Street and Olive Avenue. Request: To permit a portion of tho main building to be constructed with 101 sidayar3 ectbacks on both sidon. and to allow an increase in the permitted lot coverage from 50 to 56 per4ient. ON NOTION BY SAUER AND SECOND BY SCNUMACHER C'ONDrTIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-17 NM ' DEMIED BY THE FOULOVIN i TOTE WITH THE FOLL)WING � AYESS Bannister, Winchell, Potter, Schumacher, Bauer NOESt Kaneflok ,AUIMT x None AAe' WIN s None r PF Fibga Two 'I N QJAQ. •, l. , Since the Townlot specific Plan al1cws for indivi.dual detached units on separate parcels or units developed with zero lot line ..ancept on two contiguous 15-..foot parcels, there are no exceptional circumstances unique to t;•e petitioned property that deprives it of the privileges n4,Wally enjoyed . 2. Since the Tournlot Specific Plan allows for zero lot lire dev- clolsaent with a minimum of five (5) foot separation between every unit, the granting of this conditional exceptiorti would constitute a grant of special privilege inconAlstent with normal limitations. 3 . The Townlot Specific Plan allows fur the develolment of these individual 25-.foot lots, therefore, this conditional exception is not necessary for the pr"servation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property nights. I Dl CUS§LAINa ' The applicant is requesting to allow the development of a four unit project, each unit on an individual 25-font lot, having ccgmmor, walls along the property line between each of the units. The cent::r two units will have a zero lot line setback on both aides of the property. This in essence would create a four unit attached project. ?".:e ap- plicant has also requested that the permitted site coverage be in- 1 creased from 50 to 55 percent. The Townlot Specific Plan presently allows a zero ].at line concept j betweer, two ntrcels, however, the opposite site yard of each unit mast have a minimum side yard setback of not less than 5 feet. This would allow no riore than two .ttached units in any one catnplex. Humerova single family homem have been developed under the Townlot 5uecif#c Mari since its adoption in 1976. This ordinance allows for detached units having 3 foot side yards on eitbar side and attached unity with zero lot line along a Common property boundary with the 5 foot side yard setback on the opposite side of each unit, The original intent of thin � ordinance was to allow single family hcmes on 25 foot lots in this area, while providing some reasonable separation between single units, or units comprised of not more than tiro ride by side. At the April 7, 1981 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission quentl.cm*d the nonditional excbption procedure for trying to accomplish thin' co►acept . The Commission also noted that during a meeting between the applicant, Planning Staff, and an ad hoc comaittee of the Planning Commission, several mrntbs prior to the meeting, the applicant igdi- cated that his would be willing to prepare a study and poosible code aw11&vent in order to allow this zero lot line concept an he is praemmting it. Tha applicant has not submitted a study or code. . amndwrnt regarding this matter. Therefore, the Commission requested that the staff research the Specific Plan DistrLct and roevaluaete the atarMarda, therein fur the purpose of r possible code amendment, taking into considerattion *he Implementation of On presented con- cept. The staff indicated it would be nix to eight weeks before a study and proposed code amendment could come back to the planning CaMissiCM. M . 1 r t Page Three 4 Pursuant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the requested coiidiUonal exception is a Clasen V categorical exemption. Not applicable. ALTAR & IJZ =ION The City Council may consider overturning the Planning C mtmission ' s denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-17 rind allow they development of the four aide L• y side attached units as proposed by the applicant. 1. Area Map 2. Staff Report dated April 7, 1981 q 3. Letter of Appeal Respectfully submitted ; e w. aline Director Depa►rtmant of Movclopment Services CWr:JWP: SMB:gc i l 7 REl UEdt, FOR CITY COUNCIL*ACTION Di"a -April 24 , 1981 --- Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator'.'i P'oWsO by: Departrnlert. of Development Services Sub*-t: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO 1 -1.8 $tnar mt of h►ue, ResemmoWatkrn, AnWyWs,. Funding Source, AltenutWe AcUOM. Attuftwty: k. AUMENT' .gF__j VE: Transmitted for y3ur consideration is an appeal to conditional Exception No. 01- A a request to permit a 101 sic'e yard set- back on both sides of 25 ft. logs in the Townlot area and to allow an increase in the maximitin lot coverage from 50 - 56 percent. NEC(?l�IENp��'1ON t The Piatning Commission and Planning StaEf recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission ' s denial of Con- ditional Exception No . 81.-10 . MUYS19: Appellant: Robert L. Corona 7308 Center. Drive Hiint:ington Beach, Calif . 92647 Applicant: Corona Development Company, Inc . 7308 Center Drive Huntington Beach, Calif . 92647 Location : Southeast corner of 18th Strnet and Orange Avenue . Request : To permit a portion of the n.ar.n building to be constructed with 101 sideyard :ietbacks on both sides and to allow an increase in the permitted lot coverage from 50 to 56 percent . pLJfN UN 9t7MIfiSI9N ACTION ON APRjAj 7.j J 281: ON MMION BY SAUER AND SECOND BY SCHUKACEER CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-18 WAS DENIED BY THE FULGOWING VOTE WITH THE FOLLOWING PINDINGS: AM Bannister, Winchell , Porter, Schmnacher, Hauer loss$ Kenefick AB RM S None AUTAIN s Nane "n oUh �) :R S Page Two I . Since the Tc)wnlot rpecJfis Plan allow-1 for individual- detached units on separate parcr.7s or units developed with zero .lot line concept on two ccnt.iquous 25-foot parcels, there are no exceptional circumstances unique to the petitio»ed property that deprives It of the privilegee normally enjoyed , 2 . Since: the Townlot Specific Plan allows For zero let line dev- elopment with a minimum of five (5) foot. separ.atfon between every unit, the grahti ng of this conditional excampti.on would constitute a grant of special priviiege inconsistent with normal limitations . 1 . The Townlot Specific Plan allows for the devefloprmer<nt of these individual 25.400t: lots ; therefore, this conditic,na.i exception Is not: necessary for the preservation, and en,joyinant of one or more substantial property rights . flI$Ci.1_ ,�Q�3 The applicant is requesting to allow the development �*f a four unit project, each unit on an individual 25-foot lot, havisrg common wales alorig the property lirce between each of the units . The center two unitria will have a zero lot line setback on both sides of the property. This in essence would create a four unit attached project . The ap- plicant has also requested that the permitted site coverage be in- creased from 50 to 56 percent. The Townlot Specific Plan presently allows a zero .lot line concept between twu parcels , however, the opposite side yard of each unit must have: a minimum side yarn setback of not ler�, than 5 few' . This would allow no more than two attached units in any one compLeex. Numerous single family homes have been developed under the Towrelot Specific Plain since its adoption in 1976 . This ordinance allows for detached units hawing 3 foot aide yards on either sides and artta .:bed units with zero lot Line along a common property boundary with tKa 5 foot side yard setback on the opposite side of each unit . The original .intent of this ordinance was to allow single family homes on 25 F.,ot lots in this area, while providing some reasonable separation betweeri single units, . or units comprised of not more than two side by sine. At the April 70 1981 Planning Commission m"eting, the Commission quest:toned the conditional excerption procedure for t:ryAng to accomplish this concept . The Commission also noted that during a meeting between the applicant , Planninq Staff, and an •�d hoc committees of the Planning Commission, several months prior to th%e meeting , the applicant indi- cated that he would be willing to prepare a study and possible code nrnenfteent in order to allow this zero lot line concept ae he is presenting It , The applicant has not submitted a study or code amendment regarding this matter . Therefore, the Commf as i on requested that the staff research the Specific Plan District and reevaluate the standards therein for Lhe purpose of a possible cob* amendment, taking into consideration the implementation of the presented con- veept,. The staff i nd tcated it would be six to eight weeks befor* a study and prroponed code amendment could come back to the Planning ' V � i i Page Three Pursuant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality Act , the requested conditional exception is n Class V categorical exemp-tion. 49KOE_ Not applicable . 91' The City Council may consider overturning the Planning Commission ' s denial of Conditional Exception tio. 81-18 and allow the development of the four side by side attached units as proposed by the applicant . §VR !QH 71 ti r 1 NFQ T I OI : 1 . Area Map 2 . Staff Report dated April 7 , 1981 3 . Letter of Appeal Respeettully submitted: Ines W. P l.in, Ui.�rectcr Uepartim nt of Development Services CWT i JWP: S148 i g-- h �r 4 ' f STAf EPOR '!'0 : Planning Corurnission l f'Ro1M: [)evelufxrrent. Services DATE : April 7, 1981 � �p1T1ONAla . E CEpllOt']_NU, _81 - I (Referred by Board of Zoning Adjustments ) I,?PL C II' : Corona Dave i cipment Co . , Inc . DATE ACCEPTED) : 7308 Center Ave . F'ebrua';ry 25, 1981 + llUntingt:on Beach, Ci: . MAN1?A'TUFiY_ f„ ROCES INS_DACE : REQUEST : To permit a portion of I.he main April 25, i981 building to he constructed with zeros foot sldv yard on both ZONE : Townlot. Specific Sides . Pi an, Area One LQC.hTJON : Located at the southeast OWNERAL PLAN : Medium DensO y corner of 11t.h Street and Itc:� ;dt'ntial nl Lve Avent+n . I.,xi s+1'I,vc. USE : ACINAME: . 269 acres Vacant 1 161`het staff is recommending that the Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 81-171 a request to permit a zero side yard setback can both sides of a 25 f t . lot aizd to a l low -in increase in the maximum lot coverage from 50 - 56 percent. Conditional Exception No_ 81-17 has been referred to the Planning Com- mission by the Board of Zoning Adjustmenta. This application is a request to alloy a zero side yard setback on both sides of two of the four contiguous lots located in the Townlat Specific Plan Area and to also allow an increase in the site coverage f roni 50 - 56 percent. . This proposal would allow four units on it dividual lots with common walla at the property liner establishing a four unit side-by-side complex . Y.s.SUP.,S At 1 or t't`V J ewing theidentifiedproposed project , the staff has the ' t i ►1 1 e�w t +tit j ncactet� an'l ivartt deiminstrat.vd a hardship it of der to justify the sir aiii i nq or a VOtId t t iOna 1 exoe!pt ,ton7 A9ft i • rp H1- 17 2 . 1s the granting of the cundi:. i,anal exception necessary for the preservation and en joynent of tho ::ppl icant ' s property rights? 4 , (, RO ENTA ft__S:[&1US : Pursuant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality Act , the requested condit+lonal t_. ception it a Class V Categorical Exemption. Li 0 _ P? _70NxN+C. 14NA CFNNRA� P1.L�+N ION : 5ubjeidt property is located or, the rjoutheaat cornier of 11th Street and Olivia Avenue in the Old Town Specific Pl&n, District one. Subject property in presently vacant of development and .is des) gneted on the Oeneral plan as Medium Rensi,ty Residential . The properties to the north, east, south, and west of the subject cite � are also zoned Townlot Specific Plon, Area one , designAlLed on the General Plant as Medium Density Reai.deritial and are developed with single gamily and multi-family residential units . The applicant 's request is to allow the development of a four unit complex, each on frtdividual 25 ft. lots having common walls along the property lime of all of the unite. The center two units would have a zero lot line ols both sides of ti.i: ,property. The Townlot Specific fo%Wlan presently allows a zero lot line concept between two parcels, however, the opposite side yard of each unit must have a minimum 5 ft. _. a'do yard setback. The applicant is requesting that the center two unite have the sero lot line concept along bath side property lines . This in essence would creates a 4-unit attached complex. The applicant has also requested that the permitted site covorage be increased from 50 - 56 percent , Numerous single family homes have been developed tinder the Townlot specific Plan since its adoption in 1976 . This ordinance allows for oetached units having a 3 ft . side yard an either side and attached units with a zero lot line along a common property boundary with 5 ft . PAdea yard along the opposite side of each unit . The original intent of this ordinance was to a 1 l ow single family homes can each 25 ft. lot in the area,* while providing some meaningful separation between .9+1n(lic- units or Units comprised of no more than two side-by-side. Thc• Mall ronc tie :; 1-hat they proposed project will c•i-oate an extremely hiilky development . Those four units attached side-by-side are proposed tc1 be Conatrue:ted three stories high. They staff feels that this wx11 vreate a 3-story high wall , almost 100 feet long. The applicant of this request has answered the four following questions nn the application Forin in this manner . i *sub �! r r *"�' ►.,V H1 - 17 1 . V!hat eXcept ionaI r. it cimist4nr.ie.; 0ppI y to pt,t i t ion property ( aric1udinq size, shapc- , totingraphy , locatri.on, or nurrotindr, ntls? that deprive it, of pr•i v i lecivs norimi l l y en j oyed i nswr Norte 2. Will the candi tional exception constitute a tic ant of speciGl privilege inconsistent with normal limitations: n PhD.or : No Why .is this conditional exception necessary for the preservation and enjoyment- of one or more substantial property rights &FIVY120 The plan shown presents a better usage of the lineal ground area avall.abl.e on the site . It- converts the unusable 3 it . side yawl into a usable court: -•ard and b ft . side yard . 4 . S+,ate reasons why the granting of this conditional exceptions will not be materially detrimental to the public: welfare? &U w,pl;_r In compliance with front and rear seetbac), .:', and height requirements , the project-, is laic] out visually Trot to appear, to by connected from the front or rear view. There is access for Fire, Police, and public util.i tieas from both front and rear, and will not: be materially detrimental to the public welfare . The above answers do no' demonstrate iardship related to the size, shape topography, locektion, or surroundings which are required for they granting of a conditional exception . The app%cans: has indicated that the granting of this conditional exceptit n will :show for a more usable sides yard , when: in fact the code provides T ur a zero lot line concept with S f t . opposite side yards . Therefore, this concept is already provided for by the Ordinances Code , howeyver, limiting the number of units aide by side to two . :,t -iff analysis indica ,"ns that the applioant has not- demonstrated a hardshil, veer i .,: this Condit iun0 uxeept ion nevessary for the preservation and on-- juywent. of the appl icart, e s property, therefore , the staff it recommeendincz t h.et IN, ("o4 reimsion deny Conditiionn ! Exception No . 81--17 . 1hised rote the abe- vo analysis and the following findings , the staff r terorwniend that the !e 1 a nn i ncl commia=ss t ern deny Cand i i ona l Exception No. 1 . Shear, they 'Pawn1ot :ovvific• t' lan allows for individual detached units of .e ,1e•r'cy lot. t We elovel opine n t on 25 f t . lots in the Townlot Arco, h w✓ t he,•ry is no exce pt icin<-1l rirc•umstancei unique to the petitioned r proport y that derpriven it. c,f pr 1vj, legea normally enjoyed . � (� (� w a i' IT r. 2 . 1; in e. the '1ownlat. Snr:ci fi.c Plan allows for' zero lot line deve1opmen v-ith a minimum of 5 ft. . separation between every othm- unit , .he (Iranti,ng of this conditional exception would constitute a grant of special privilege incr.)nsistent with normal 11mi.tations . i 'rho Townlot Specific Man allows for the development of these individual 25 f t . lots , therefore, this conditional exception is riot necessary for they preservation ind enjoyment of one or mort: substau lla l prope:r t X r*i.ghts , 8:gC ATThCbt ENT,A 1 . Area Map 2 . Site Plan received and elated April 3 , 1981 I I i t I. M ♦I 1i1 i r . , a � f w ' / ,' • • T • 'S r � J Of Alk ' 0." .! w I � r uming[on neecnt aeveiopr Services department STAf f - - IEPORT.--- ------ - TO : Pliinning �:rn►mir��; i �,n rROM : Development- 5ervives DATE: April 7 , 1981 CONDIT?oNAL_. EXCEPTION NO , RJ_�1t3 (r b erred ' Y E1oar•c3 of ;toning Adjustments) API. 'LlCANT: Carona Development Co . , Tnc . DA'ii.: ,,C:Q:PTk;D : 7308 Center Ave ,, February 25 , 1981 Huntington Beach, Cu . MANDATOR Y PROMS r ,%Lc A_TF . ,Q E.,` ro permit a portio" of the main April 1. 25 , 1981 building to be constructed with zero fool side yard on Loth sides . ZONE ; ' OV'r. lvt spec i f i.c: L.D(:AT 1QON : Located at the sots t hea si: turner of [plan. Aftea one 18th Street anti oranq(,- Ave. GENERAL P Medium Density aesidentia.i. CR ' 4F: . 269 a•�res X,1S't'INt, LJJL: Vacant a_Al §STED ACTION . The st-iff is recommending that, the Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 81-18, a request to permit a zero side yard setback on both sides of a 25 ft. lot a--id to allow an increase in the maximum loL coverage from 50 - 56 percent . O N N mA,r I ON: I Conditional Exception No . 61-18 has been referred to the Planning Com-- j triissinn by the, Board of Zoning Adjustments . 'rhi. s api7licaL•ion is a request to allow a zero s.icip }yard setback on both sides of two of the four contiguous lots located in the Townlot Specific Plan Area and to also allow an increase in the site coverage from 50 - 56 percent . This proposal would allow four units on indivi ,!ual iota with common walla at the property line establishing a four- unit side-by-side complex. ,0 SUtRY ()F' _i 5U ES: Aft.et rrvIewinq the proposed project , the staff has identified the fol. lowing imalloo : 1 . Has the appl iluant: dvinr�n.91 r•► t e d n h0r dship in ��� �i,. � to justify the j granting of a ctandi t ionR, l cxcept.i on? I AS CE to1-IS 2. 1 :i the gi ant. inn of ' ho r-ondi t. 1orlill l'�Cd`t~O� l (111 nor o r ary for f'.hv prese.-Vat. ion and en joymernt �)!.' the tl,ppi iCant. propert•y ri.c,jhts? 4 . 0 Pursuant to Sect.ian 151.09 -)f the California F'rlvitonincrnt,ll Ouality Act , the requested conditional exception is ;i clas:s v c zitellorical LXempt' ion . S. OINUINC tAN >} - .� SI( N ►TTON:� O --AV j_ Z � Sub j ec t property is located on the soli the a s t corner of 18th Street and O a►nge Auemw it, thrr Old T )wn ,Specific Plan , L).i :,tr.iet Cane . Sub iec-t property is presently vacant of development and is desicnate3d on the General Plain as Medium De-nsity Residential . The properties to the north, cast, south, and west of the subject site are also zoned Townlot Specific Plan, Area One, desi(Inated on the General Plan as Medium Density Nesidential and are developed with single Lamily and mult.i•-family residential unit.s . 6. �1 d,N LYSIS: The applicant ' s request is to allow the development of a four unit � c(xnplex, each on individual 25 ft . lots havin conutllor. walls aloe the g n property line of all of the units . The center two units would have a zero lot line on both sides of the property. 'f.he Townlot Specific Man presently allows a zero .lot line concept between two parr.els, however, the opposite side yac•d of jac:h unit must have a minimum 5 ft . ,side yard setback . The applicant ' s reque stinq that the center two units have the zero lot line concept along both side property linen. This in essence would create a 4-unit attached complex . The applicant has also requested that the permitted si te coverage be increased from 50 -- 56 percer Wimerouts sing family homes have been developed under the Townlot .Specific Plan ince its adoption in 1976. This ordinance allows for detached unit,- having a 3 ft . side yarct on aitber side and attached units with a pro lot line n1ong a common property boundary with 5 ft . side Yard al.- g the opposite side of *-ach unit . 'rho original intent of this ord; ,nce was to allow single family homes on e:-.c;i 25 ft. .lot. in the ; ea, while providing somQ meaningful AeparaLion betwnen single uni' , or units comprised of no more than two side--by-side. The sLr- i f concurs that the proposed project will errato ,n extremely bulky de�veloptnent . Theses Four units attached side--by-sidic area proposed to be constructed three stories high. The staff reels that this will creator a 3-.story high wall, almost 100 Feet long . The applicant or this request has answered the four following questions on the application form in this manner. Y + � tom. _ • , �.w�d,y 1 a rE N1 -1H 1 . I-1h,tt exroj)LionaI viroutngtancos apply to peel it ion property ( inr_luclino � :-; 1zc,, sll,- p(!, Lopoq.raphy, location, or survoundings) that deprive it of p:;fvilegr. s normally enjoyed? 1►n None 7 . 1•1111 the condit ,for,al Fxception const:i Lute a urant of special privilege inconsistent w.lth normal limitations? 6Msw_g1 : No J . Mary is this conditional exception necessary for t ho preservation and enjuyment of one or mare substantial property rights? n •w r ; The plan shown presents a better usage of the, lineal ground area available on Hhe site. It converts the unusable 3 f. t . side yard into a usable court: yard and 6 ft . side yard . 4 . State reasons why the c1r ant.irty of this conditional exception will nest tie materially detrlmental to the public welfare? �n .da: in compliance with front and rear setback.n. and height requirements, the project is .laid alit visually not to appear to be connected from the front or rear view. There is access for. fire , ' Police, and Public utilities from both front and rear, and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare . The above answers do not demonstrate hardship related to the size, shale , topography, location, or surroundings which are required for the granting of a► conditional exception . The applicant has indicated that the. granting of this conditional exception will allow for a more usable side yard, when In fact the code provides for a zero lot line concept with 5 f t . opposite side yards . Therefore, this concept is already provided for by the Ordinance Cade , however, limiting the number of units side L:)y side to two . Staff analysis indicates that the applicant bas not demonstrated a hardship nnr is this cand.iticnal. exception necessary for the preservation and en- Joynent of the applicant ' s property, therefore, the staff is recommending that the Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 81-17. 2.j 0 .....�t�,�.��T Y N: . 11ancoil n the above areal yal s and the following r i ndincls, the stal•r' uvrungitend that the Planninq Conaniasi.on deny Conditional Exception No. Ai�17. 1 . .Since the Townlot: speciric, i,ian atiows for Individual detached units or a zero lot lint devr.lohrnr_nt on 25 ft . .lots in thr. Townlot Area, � there is no exceptional circumstance unique to the petitioned property that deprives i t: of prfi.vi l eges normally enj oyed. �4' 7 a t , I t 1 . I; i r1(:e thn' 'rownlot Sf.oci f l c v lan a i lows for :'.('r"f7 lots ] inn dove l.opment, with a minimum, of 5 ft . separation between over•y other unit , chanting of this s•:onditional ex::ept.ion would cmi stltute a grant of spoci al privilege inconsistent with normm 1. ].imitations . � . The townlot Specific. Plan allows for the developmerit of these indlviaual 25 It . lets , therefore , this c(andition.-l. exception i not. nece s.,;ary for- the pru-servat.ion and enjoyment of one nr more substantial propel ty r-icihtS . 5MB:gc T' 1 : 1 . Area Map 2. Site plan received and dated April 3, 1981 i III ..VV . 4 r � , Yp " r , — f f orFm �� "'' •�, 'fir, • �' �w �i/ '• ��, 1 SAP ol of • 1 , , 4 tIrop •, �, ol ' ' , / , �� to u: � �. , /•'/ I + 1 I I '' / /'/// ; of 46 •r+ k, i ' i1 n w G '•y Nk e X►any K. L!�:yr! " 16285 Lars GUMli i wilitt r. •----=.,.r..,..r.— c, r p 4 I n' It CRY of rmGTom BL6g4 TIVE OffXE REOUES FOR CITY COUNCL ACTION Dated April 24, 1981 to: Honorable Mayer and City Council !ulMttdidby: Charles W. Thompson, City Admini,stratc�r��� how edby: Department of Development Services N61w: APPEAL 011' CONDITTONAb EXCEPTION No 81•-1,8 E fteup it V Isar, Row mmwdation, Analysis, Funding Source, ltemative Actions, Attedirrants: � L TEKEhj QF_ jS : Transmitted for your consideration is an apneal to Conditional Exception tic). 81-].8 a request Lo permit a ' 01 side ya -6 set.- back orl moth sides of 25 ft . lots in the Townlot area and to allow an increase in the maximum Iot coverage from 50 55 percent. RECOMMEtLDAT, : The Planning Commission and Planning Staff reccmmends that the City Council uphold the Planning commission ' s denial of Con-- dl tiona 1. Exception No . 81- 18 . Appellant : Robert L. Corona 7308 Center Drive Huntington B-• ac h, Calif . 92647 Applicant: Corona Development Company, Inc . 73C8 Center Drive Huntington Beach, Calif . 92547 Location% Southeast corner of 18th Street and Orange Avenue. Request: To permit a portion of the main building to be constructed with 101 sic:eyard setbacks on both sides and to allow an increase in the permitted left coverage f i,om 50 to 56 percent. I P&MIn a...0 .;SS 1OK„.ACTION .QN .A j!R IL 7,. 1281: i ON W?'1`lON BY BAUER AND SECOND BY 0CHUNIACHER C0Nj,)J-T-'Mt1A1- EXCEPTIO:: NO. 41-18 WAS DENIED BY THE FOA'AjOWING VOTE WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: AYES: B,arnister, Winchell, Porter, Schumficher, Dauer NOES: Re3nefick ABSENT s None ABSTAIN: None y purge Two FhbINC-#S e 1. Since the Townlot Specific plan allows for individual detached ' units on separate parcels or unitm developed with zero lot line concept on two contiguous 25-foot parcels, there are no exceptional circumstances unique to the petitioned property that deprives it of the privileges normally (,-njoyed. 2. Mince they Townlot Specific plan allows for zero lot line dev- elopment with a minimum of five (5 ) foot separation between every unit, the granting of this conditional exception would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with normal limitations . 3 . The Townlot Specific Flan allows for the development of these individual 25.-foot lots; therefore, this conditional exception is riot nee-:ssary for the preservation and en i oyment of c:)ne or more substantial. property right&. DYSC:USSIaN The applicant: is requesting to allow the development: of a four unit � project, each unit on an indi,ri.Jual 25--foot lot, having common walls alone the Property line between each of the ut,its. The center two units will have a zero lot line setback on both sides of the property , � This in essence would create a four unit attached project . The ap- plicant. has also requested that the permitted site coverage be in- creased from 50 to 56 percont. The Townlat SFecif i e plan presently allows a zero :Lot line concept between two parcels, however, the opposite side. yard of each unit must have a minimum side yard setback of not less than 5 feet. This would allow no more than two attae'hef-' units in any one complex. Numerous single family homes have been developed under the Townlot Specific plan since its adoption in 1976. This ordinance allows for detached units having 3 foot side yards on either side and attached units with zero lot line along a common property boundary with the 5 foot side yard Patback on the apposite side of each unit . The original intent of this ordinance was to allow single family homes on 25 toot lots in this � area, while providing some reasonable separation between single units? or units comprised of not more than two aside by side . At the April 7, 19'• - Planning Commission meeting, the Commission questioned the conditional exception procedure for trying to accomplish � ' thia concept . They Commission also noted that during a meeting between the applicant, Planning Staff, and an ad hoc committee of the Planning 4 Indi-Cammisaion, several months prior to the meeting, the applicant cated that he mould be willing to prepare a study and posLible code ew amendmnt in order to allow this zero lot line concept as he is presenting it. The applicant has not submitted a study or code ameudwrert regarding this matter . Therefore, the Commission requested that -.he staff research the Specific Plan District and reevaluate � the standards therein for the purpose of a possible code amendment, taking into consideration the implementation of the presented con. cept. The staff indicated it would be six to eight weeks before a study and proposed codes amendment could come back to the Planning F 11 addib Pago "We* Pursuant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality" Act, the requested conditional exception is a Class 'V category.cal exempt•i on. 22=0 gongs k g Not applicable,. ` a� �►fiIv � IUr� The City Council may consider overturning the planning Commission ' s denii`_ Of Condttional Exception No . 81-3.0 and allow the development of the four side by side attached units ac; proposed by the applicant. i 1 . Area Mep 2. Staff Report dated April 7, 1981 3 . Letter of Appeal Respectfully submitted: mes W. Palin, Director Department of Development services � CWT:JWP:SMB:gc F r l c. 1 fd�,rKti1 •• hItnthWon beach devwlopnj ,�59rVIC06 dOPSAMant S f f FA EPORT , 'Irof Planning Commission "chi Development 5errvf car R P ATIG o April 7. 1981 s (Referred by Board of Zoning Adjustments) .►�t,�, i Corona Development Co . , Inc: . DATE_ACCEPTED ! � 7108 Center Ave. February 415 , 1981 I Huntington Heath, Ca . MANDAZ'(&Y P. QCF,$§INCH DA : : To permit a portion of the main April, 25 , 1981 building to be constructed with zero foot side yard on both .LONE: `Y'ownliat Specific sides . Plan , Area One W3:12p : Located at the southeast fQMIN AL PLAN : Medium penalty corner of 1 1 t.h Street and lies .dential 'f Olive Avenue , EXf STTNG USE. Vacant 0,9AGI: . 269 acres JA2 . St3 UaTEU ACTION: The staff is recommending that the Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 81--171 a request to permit a zero side yard setback on both sides of a 25 ft. lot and to allow an increase in the maximum lot coverage from 50 - 56 percent. Conditional Exception No. 81--17 has been referred tc -he Planning Com- mission by the Board of Zoning Ad justmenta . This application is a request to allow a zero side yard setback on both sides of two of the four contiguous lots located in the T'ownlot Specific Plan Area and to also allow an increase in the site coverage from 50 - 56 percent . This proposal wMId allow four units can individual lots with common walls at 7f�W property line establishing a four unit side--by-side complex. Alter rcaviewinq the proposed project., the staff has identified the t t'1%11owIIfci Issues 1 . lhii4 then applJezanr demonstrated a hardship in order to justify the ctr:int i nct of a oondi t ional exception? f �•ras�i w w s'`• �' MID .t � Fri• 0 JAW, Pogo TWO, 09 41-17 i 2 is the granting of the conditional exception necessary for the +I preservation and enjoyment of the applicants property rights? M: PurgUent to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the requested conditional exception .is a Class V Categorical Exemption. _.._._• Subject property is located on the southeast corner of llth Street and Olive Avenue in the told Town Specific Plan, District one. Subject property is presently vacant of development and is designated on the General Plan as Medium Density Residential . The properties to the north, east, south, and west: of the subject site are also zoned Townlot Specific Plan, Area one, designated on the General Plan as Medium Density Residential and are developed with single family and multi-f.afnily residential units . E 6. 0 ANAt,XS I S t The applicant ' s request: is to allow the development of a four unit complex, each on Individual 25 ft . lots having common walls Nlong the property line of all of the url ts. The center two units would have a zero lot line on both sides of the property. The Townlut Specific fl"Wlen presently allows a zero loc 1I.ne concept between two parcels, however, the opposite side yard of each unit must have a minimum 5 ft. sides yard setback. The applicant is requesting that the center two units have the zero lot line concept along both side property lines . This in essence would create a 4-unit attached complex. The applicant has also requested that the pe nutted site coverage be increased from 50 - 56 percent. Numerous single family homes have been developed under the Townlot Specific Plan since its adoption in 1976 . This ordinance allows for detached units having a 3 ft . side yard on either side and attached units with a zero lot line along a common property boundary with 5 ft. aide yard along the opposite side of each unit . The original intent of this ordinance :►as to allow single family homes on each 25 ft. lot in the area, while providing some meaningful separation between ninnle- units or units comprised of no more than two side-by-aide. The staff concurK that. the proposed project will create an extremely bulky 4e velopenent . These futir units attached side-by-side are proposed to be constructed three stories high. The staff feels that this will Y create a .3-story high wall, almost 100 feet long . The applicant of this request has answered the four following questions or the application form, in this manner. i r I •Ir r1 � rt Y Page Three CX 81-17 to Wh4t exceptional circumstances apply to petition property (including vise, ehape, topography, location, or surroundincla) that deprive it of privileges normally enjoyed? k.. 5., geri None 2. Will the conditional exception constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with normal limitations? Anaw r: No Y" 3. Why ie t.Aa conditional exception necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of • one or more substantial property rights? Any: The plan shown presents a better usage of the lineal ground area available on the site. It converts the unusable 3 ft , side yard into a usable court yard and 6 ft, side yard . 4 . State reasons why the granting of this conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public: welfa, e? Ara ear : In compliance with front and rear setbacks , and height requirements, the project is laid out visually not to appear to be connected from the Front or rear view. Where is access for Dire, Police, and public utilities from bath front and rear, and will not be materially detrimental tc• the public: welfare . The above answers do not demonstrate hardship related to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings which are required for the granting of a conditional exception. The applicant has indicated that the granting of this conditional exception will allow for a more ubable side yard, when in fact the cede provides for a zero lot .line concept with 5 ft . opposite side yards. Therefore, this concept is already provided for by the Ordinance Code, however, limiting the number of units side by side to two. staff analysis indicates that the applicant has not demonstrated a hardship nor is this conditional exception necessary for the preservation and en- '^_ ioynemt of the applicant ' s property, therefore, the staff is reco meind i ng 't tmt- the Commission deny i7o.ridi tiona l Exception No. 81-1 7 . a; I.kined on the above analysis and the following findings , the staff >.'. remand that the Planninq Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 1 . Since the Townlot t:pec tfic• Plan allows for individual detached units for a tern 10L line development on 25 ft . lots in the Townlot Area, t 1w,re i a no excerpt i ona l circumstance unique to the petitioned prtniort.y that deprives it of privileges normally enjoyed. SStier�j•�pjR" ':-1 4'. —.. _ � r � Y 1 , l . J' Page Four Cr @1..17 �r 2 Since Ow Townlot Specific plan all owe for zero lot line development# with a minimum of 5 ft . separation between every ether unit, the granting of this conditIonal exception would constitute* a grant of special privilege inconsistent with noxmdl limitations. 3. The Townlot Specific plan allows for the development of these individual 25 ft , lots, therefore, this conditional exception is not necessary for the preRervati on r.nd enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. AVgc A T`ACMINIS z 1 . Area Map 2. 5it a plan received and dated April 3 . 1981 1 \ I go r • ' �fj • ' wk + • 14 ,!- . , . IF 00 OF ol 0)6 OF 10 I , ' r r , I' 01. /• ip / I 01, 1± Y y. Ile� 1. .41 M 1� i 0 dl y t f. xr4 S P�r i,s:'41iih'.„ 6Y.y f. � untington beach devleiopmt;w,, services department Wftf f .o.. EPORT...- t. } M 'planning Commission 1t a Development Services 'JAM April 7, 1981 4ZT*Ql.rarNAI,�"-XCIFT�roVI. N,0� S1-1�8 (referred by Board of Zoning Adjustments ) 11 Ili��p�r M CAM; Corona Developmer,t Co . , Inc . DATE ACCEPTED: 7308 Venter Ave . February 25, 1.98 i P Huntington Beach, Ca. i' MEhdAT_UR_Y PROCE58ING DATE , f M: To permit a portion of the main April 25 , 1981 building to he constructed with zero foot :.•.le yard on bath sides . ZONE: Townlot Specific Plan, ARea One QQ :LQ.N Located at the southeast corner of 18th Street and Or.ange Ave . GENERAL PLAN: Medium Density Residential . ?69 acres FXTST NG U4�: Vacant 'i 1 . _AWGE TEn_ACTION The staff is reconimcndi,ng that; the Commission deny r anditional Exceg)tion No . 81--18, a requrn..st to permit a ?era side yard setback on both sides of a 25 ft. lot and to allow an inciec.se: in the maximum lot coverage from 50 -- 56 percent , . 2,0 GENERA ZNFL7LMrlaN: Conditional Exception No. 81-18 has been raferred +-o the Planning Com- mission by the Board of Zoning Adjustments . This application is a request to allow a zero side yard set:bac L on both sides of two of the four contiguous lets Located in the Townlot Specific Plan Area and to also allow an increase in the site coverlage_ from 50 - 56 percent . This proposal would allow four, units on individual lots with common walls at the property line establishing a four unit side-by--side complex. 3.t? L MMLY gZ C-34UES: 1 After reviewing the proposed project, the staff has identified the fallowing issues: L. Has the applicant demonstrated a hardship in order to justify the grantIng of a conditional exception: 41141A C , 9 t A_F4•=315 1 ' rl► t ' ,v Parie Two CH 01-18 2. 1s the granting of the conditional exception necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of the applicant ' s property rights Jil_, EMV I AQJWNTA I,tJus g Pura uant to Section 15105 of the California Environmontal Quality Act , the requested condltiorial exception is a class V Categorical Exemption. Ilk §FUitR!C?UMQJiG LAYD_USFg L_ONING,_ AND GENERAL, PLAW DESIGNATLN; Subject property Is located ore the sr�utheast corner of 18th Street and Orange Avenue in the Old Town Specific Plan, District One . Subject property is presently vacant of development and is designated on the Goneral plan as Meclium Density Residential . The properties to the north, east, south, and west of the subject site area also zoned Town-lot Specific Plan , ,area One, desi.gnited on the Derr -al Plan as Medium Density Residertc.Jal and are developed with single family and multi-family residential units . 6.0 AMLLYSI I The applicant ' s request is t,:) allow the development of a four unit complex, each can individual 1?5 ft . lots having corrnon walls along the property .line of all of the units . The center two units would have � a zero lot line on both sides of the property. The Townlot Specific Plan presently allows a Nero lot line concept between two parcels, however, the opposite side lard of each unit music have a inir►imum 5 ft . ride yard setback . The applicant ir, requesi incj that the center two units have the zero lot_ lino concept along both side, property liner;. This in essence would create a 4-unit attached complex. the applicarit has also requested that the permitted site coverage be increased from � 50 - 55 percent . J Numerous single family home: have been developed under the rowraot Specific Plan since its adoption in 1976. This ordinance allows for detached units having a 3 ft . aide yard can either si3e and attached units with a zero lot line along a common property boundary with 5 ft . aside yard along the apposite side of each unit . The original inter_t of this ordinances was to allow single family homes ors each 25 ft , lot ,in the area , while providing some meaningful separation between Angle units or units comprised of no more than two side-by-side . The staff concurz that the proposed project will create an extremely bulky development . These four units attached side-hy-side are proposed to be constructed threes stories high . The staff feels that this will create a 3-story high wall , almost 100 feet long . They applicant of this request has answered the four fallowing questions on the application form in this manner. aF; Y -14 NAM pro 1- �,. What exceptional circumstances apply to petition property (including .` alzsa shape, topography, location, or surroundings) that deprive it of privileges normally enjoyed? } SA&: None 2. Will the conditional exception constitute a grant of special privilOge inconsistent with normal limitations? A, saver: No 3 . why is this conditional exception necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights? hn&XRt The plan shown presents a getter usage of the lineal ground area available can the site . It converts the unusable 3 ft . side yard into a usable court yard and G ft . side yard . 4 . State reasons why the q .anti.ng of this conditional. exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare? mow . In compliance with front and rear setbacks, and haight requirements, the proj3ct is laid out visually nct to � appear to be cor-ierted from the front or rear, view. There is acces:i for Fire, ' Pali.ce. and public util'4* ties from bath froiit and rear, and will not be materially detrimental to the public welEare . The above answers do not: demori strato hardship related to the size, shape, I, topography, location, or surroundings which are 17r_rtuir. e_d Ear the granting of a conditional exception . The. applicant has inOicatecl that the granting of this conditions 1 exception will allow for a mrre usable side yard, When in fact toe code provides for a zero lot line concept with 5 ft . opposite sjde yards . Thoi:efore, this concept is already provided for by the Ordinance Code, however , limiting the number of units side by side � to two. Staff analysis indicates that the applican': teas not monstrated a hardship � nor is this conditional exception necessary for the cservation and en- joyment of the applicant' s property, t:het,efore, the :aff is reconanending that the Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 81-17. T•0 JJ&5E.HQA.TXON s Based on the above analysis and the following findings, the staff recommend that the planning Commission deny Conditional Exception No. M121MLY29 DENIM: 2. Sine the 'rownlot specific Plan allows for individual detached units ' or a zero lot line development on 25 ft . .lots in thv Townlot Area , there is no exceptional circuinstance unique to the petitioned property that deprives it of I)rivileges normally enjoyed. y l 1 !,• i'+1 n , , t Page Four r ���11 QQ VAS. 81-18 Since the Townlot Specific Alan allows for zero lot line development, with a • minimum of. 5 tt . separation between every other unit, the granting of this conditional exception would canstitute a grant of special privilege 1noonscistent with normal limitations . The Townlot Specific Plan al-lovs for the development of these individual 25 ft . .lots , therefore, this conditional exception is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property r1ghts. �tB s qe f Area Map 2. Site plan received ;.nd date :( April 3 , .198.1 i i r r � r ' 1 a j ' J 4.4 • or �' fit/ ,• •'•. / �' + �'�'��� � , '• •'. � � 10 Ile •'' • / Y r it ," , loI r �I • / ` I• 40 co LLJ / • I ' ' Y / � •� 'j• + ♦ ♦+ r1 �� •,♦,./ . +• aka` ♦ + i ` IN 000 do r A , • �, .r 1 LL-- •�1 r IL rri Op 41 ' / •' r , • 1 ' e • , 01 DO ,, , r •' ', . do dvP .� •. . , , /% , •' /. f , is 1. � r /, / ', , � . •',,/ •rI, r . pie, r /' • ' , /• ,, � ;';• - ; .- ,! ,', ' ,/',/ -pot -,• ,, mac, /• ♦ ,•, I • r/ , ' M r0e. ,; r 7 ! * ,. •• Off•/rr I • •' ,, / {/ Ol 10 N � �I TTTT T• n' I ' '�{ 1 �� 1,aI� 5 MA .a'f4'rY�''�nt�ln+�.'����Y�{1' �1'�^` ' y� ; 'r'' ill'i+ .'y.,,, .n . ., ''�y �yyyII,,,I•y�l r .ty,. ,', ,jr,,. . .,4..11, 4Np� ' '� ., „AIF'�,�IF"����I� 'P�i('y{�rY•'�, •., a►+V�li j,i I �x� 5 I 1 Pub11•h ._ �a.� .j.. '�__s�tl IIDrics or P1 KIC WMIIIN MW TO UK DMIAL OF CX #01*141 WTICE IS GOY GIVEN that a pyblic 1 wring will be hold by the City Coti1 of the W r of Natialto hem*,a 1n- the comi 1 Chsorber of tho Civic C ator o Nw ti ft , at the Mw of j,��•- P A. . or as sow tWmCtW an passible an & #W ,ter„_, day of for 2e prrpo" of coulder q all appeal to the Plominq Cfrlssioh's denial of towitioul ExcW1001 Vo. 11-189 a r MPMt to permit a wtioa of the "in ` baildi" .to be umtmUd with taro foot Sidon yard an bath sides. The suNect prap omfW is lasted at the southeast career of loth Stmt aw ONO" Anon A lap*] deserip►tiao is oa file in t1w 09arteent of oeveloomint lerwiaes Office* All interested pemoos are invited to attend slid hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal �����I -.�_.. •rlYaf��l.ii1 a,��l/MY.��ir. I��, i~urtw.er information Aqy be obtained free the office of the City Clerk. 2M Main Street,' Monti ngton Nwch, California. 92 - (7 14) 536-522 7 DATED S tear 159 1 ftl CITY QP HUNT x SUM NEACM By: Alicia M. Wentworth city Clerk r ' /+-.'h. �Y<•'.111iiAYM'�ta rFY M� ...a+ r•w • __ _ u .��l r y U"�• y r NT *�i ,• . '' i !,Y a. M Yr w�J•,,,,r�.y .' w. K'l'r.'. �. tii"" r Y,�7 •re�';S y . y Y•wC R't'S yya it �LL�4 � . . 'S. i ,,�'! •\ ,, qy 11' rr'r� W• rrr" '� . • '. ri �,4!' y; _y'Pi�• r'!1 :.� .,T'Y• r • 1 y!i7�( Ai1i" 4• �'b ��'7�LiQ. .+�r•Y.J r o, +Y,IMibY '�J'_ r. .v A•I rY llul*blotu f IMMA10 CJ" 1; jaz+a l 24, lit Wa1 9 4i 'kM JO CAM ^ON" XdkW Quo a mrm 117 lv,,tb 5371 OPMU MOM "3 AWN= uta!1t,�, vtm MNK*4 Ohl 4 CU,MW ClF, CAW M1ttN rtJdaartes, Wif :�tb4d 90M 92U3 23457-01 44, StXftt 32V� 3 � ,L7th Start , 19#t t >4 C f 1 't , Cm 11f wton Domaho Calif 23 -M-07 211K57_03 412 Mb Ottubt 237 1021 Whitastara 7OL- MA I, I A h OLW iim� Bomb* Cluf y14 92M 8st" LIMO Calf f 92705 13 1 23-155-09 157-04 t 4 lss grin ,•Cmam 41U l aft+ SO lath 1 WVD 144antr4.140= MUMN Calif imam. C.etlif matingIzIll amck, Cau i4l1 92d4S 928 33-155-10 23157r05 •►ai, ,i A I gar PNW Des i Obaft 1Wtr1 Mkff Akg 'J' c Iav�i 200 Bath gem !f Z-45 btmot tort SmAcht Ca►l j 304 17trh Strom r A .wn framiaJam, CAII 94120 9264 OuOtiNtwil fleachp C`aI J 92 48 i!►�t �p 8� ��f 155-11 1�157�i daw "uA aril Lair P D*two im It �f y Jl r mwn 1, Cal 6"3 Dolam Vei+e 304 17'th Strut ParsdiM, Cal wonDONChs Calif !►ktns 93%9 92644 44-15"1 23'-Mr-L2 23-161-10 . �$u 3_fi, J�1> t r i+rilllar► 1�' iyrl Roy C. MCCIYmmds 19721 S"Mm C.i.=16 16285 Los Om r" 4M 100 Street l hmt qtm M.1.J *dtt , ml.I Huntington Besch, Calif. ' Aid 90603 92"s 23_ d 23-155-13 JOW stasaceinae wain OLI Cb Oul vii.sm Dal bo1 Wive 401 loth Stxee bunt jvj tm u C&lifHAtkqt1r. Beach, Calif 94647 92649 + Yy�`i ON1Y �',M #• � � h jk: qp . JL+ �+F�iri1 I ''4t s ,I . i r .�• 1Y r 4„ + ', goo Ak +„ •,T� ' � I•'' I fT �' ,� vµ. �ro a•^i ,�/,� 1�r`�I •,��r���,/,Uk l , �h"*'F-- rRr. . .rrlr ,1�.� •rY,M,w,ic.,i�Lr.$Y"�;M1 , 'i,til '4 '+Il:�lv er_ • Nrt •. :urit' , ♦., , '�i.,Y. , 'r M46 u"t w Chibri t L Parilh us"If Col 1 407 18th Start 12447 bomb* Calif „ll �r Il -17 73-ice-13 Rt'ioe Id 00"OkV 9 M46 C cmm ,1w mirin 403 IM 9tx'wt ..Araam, CAW Eton kodia, Ca t Lib 92648 i-156�Q4 , 23.156-17 U-151-15 C Vbl1e■vcart staw 1 ec323 ✓ a '' p 191.14 "*t4*t anche CMLIU Vailmy, Cali 8walty 92700 etm t 13-IM-18 , at" bq1w 313 17th Stt+aat Apt A 9 rir Ct�tii ' $-wimt He O16 Wif 92663 9 Cy 23-LW19 23-M--16 ItAntill4f/in AA MOM um a Patir" i I"Aw4ty K j art 323 17th Bttemt 49 14th ftreet fllr.wwtod asm are. 111 , Calif kImUngton ,, Calif J�1,tl7 93644 92649 _15zr111i 33-154-20 I�Vjx o foutm AMV,L Imrj D Rvid C Miahalof �.1.30 cello *0 M 17th Stye t 411 18th 81tridet rn, kph, Cal ! l 7t. #irk hmmicho, Ca 14 Meachr iif .Only 92649 92646 44.45 P-13 ;� '' 21 33-151-1d 'i,x* u ULwrccth Owww cia IMANte Steven R Ta16e-rf. 17th btreat 6851 Defianm bciv% 413 18th Street �A%UI ,Nt m AMWIO Calif 1Ax*Amtm the Calif lbsitirutm beaten, Calif I 16�b 92647 92648 , 23-151-09 Awsm y. Aoeac 1 Dy� �9et al ak)m Omp 85 �1 e 41 � +lug 17th Stma Santa ana. Cal I Hmtfnutun bed. Calif tsw►tIcrit on km awo Ca'4 92648 92701 92646 '43-15u-lb 2 51-1 } 23-151-4 J�.�rr r�uoac 40b• Buse ,,, ,.. Ceonje 14 Woods et al sb� 1" '`h Suet Bunt Aloch, Calif 4L'i loth Street •...slt;.i vjtw umu-no Calif 9264d nunti%tui Sewhj Cam �Zt,4d 92b4b /Mat et d 4*4 d d�,, ofil l�"��b1�D'"P `ca `'�m��%1 �D•yy !!['►�S �a '1 � � �w.;�, •'1.. ;N:i,,lh .'" ,f�,,.4 tr.4' .ic � i..'; �r� S 'p a� +• r11 rr. , �yY I�h'f'fr'�, Ire' �� , .1 1 r , " '• ;ti ,. � , , '1' 4 i '�• [� rr ANAM L, �� # 6 Y(t� IftOA h API NO Amm y M erg A CITY V iN�r NAM CM CI.M momM. Hearing K-lS at CAM"a1'f raara )"' r it#ta Jo Richter i 'That I m ad at am ilmae bawiat mado"d frog a dtim of do t)aftw smug,agar dw w Cl owwlyhaee yeah,and that I eaa oA 4 pant►f^am bdam ted in the ob o satitied mattar; th"I an do Plhw%w Cbrk setae pa stw of the *W01noto 'Nach Inds flfi<rlow a pm at 69 ienl ebeda* a,Pww" d is the City of NmiUwton amb Cowq of Oitaq aed a►1 & b publieitod for the dbmodmwm of bawl seas ead !It a gaffes J dutsa to. aced vhieh at ill mom bw fio �tloawd had and dW has a baeam mWerlptbo WL of papriitd wbaaribere, and WMtab am -*@psi bm boon a■tabtiahed, printed and pub• V" at r%Ww iotMM&in tines avid Owsly or Orattfe fa a p`riod wxowft auto yw dwa the owdok at whkh the atat... . is ■ prtatod opy, bees bane published in the rarukt and amift b wo of eratii umgq ar.and not is aw sunptament 6weaf,an do fol mbg 4OW4 to wit: Arrlt 23e 1 I oerti car doeMn)mdu"malty at penury that the toreao- ka it tram and oorrom UaW at................sorden.9feve.............. Col d o/Apr .1 .611 ... . .. . .. .... i MIM wo.uf•OM T r y�,*"n'�r 't' ►� �YIL }r�x r�' I�'S A!i M,r r'ti A' 1"�; "�+•' r lu,i, 'i Y {� '"� : �� 11, �XAIR � 3Ri'�,r #{Y'„ � iAY"� I �. i � �► r��'i� �1� ��rh, .A w 1, M ''y�.y !�' f r 1 r V�V�f1� ,i •1 21 �r h`, '• �ly� � " .� ��� '� r ` I ,^ r ��� `Kt ,r r,•y:���RrJ• „r ob ZK"OlCALIP"MA OW kk ' r 4� � t �i� .�M: :.t ,',f'.�^ 1 *1t� .J�, ,„I• ''rll " Ay,,, 1' r1 .. �� yF. �7� '>• . '\' i r1'Vi��.r �,�9:11� :� h ��• 'A , .,� � '`r ..I.k �.�' �;. �:''�_ 4�" ' �,a� l� ' ; � " :r��M1 r �R f r, + 'I. � �. y ,4 �w,i 't J � ' t� h�';r t J A;�•'•;�,,, j a 1�" ,i'ry' ''p ! ",h'w^Y• „� .,�. ''�.�y�yW"�: "�, �� El.,`y!"R',�'F,�I�i' i A t 5:; e CA: ON47 1 �1r . Itt�n I" for 1M�i l�wrrt�rto � � I amliplat servitor I I for fur"O r A1i�i� !�. i�e�wbrH1 toty Cl • �1bt k1166 81y4a ► of 1a t1t servic" t 1' N try art• ',1l Yq��,��" I �1. r '\• J91 r r ' / IIj . Olf • I, op 4r , ife Ao 4or Lu v 1' w G a 1 ,,j 4„ let 4 w:2' n ' t9"r +fit+pox��. .vn. u i r ilwt beach dewlopm6ni -cervices department STAf RIEPon "I Planning Commission �.� F'oomt ot!velop"nt Serviten l.� �Re F e r, ccd b y Board of loninq Adjustments), )A�-t-__� Cj �� 1 �tAl' lk ve]opjricnt Co. , Inc . -_ 7 10H Cvrl 1.crl Avo. Vebr•ua r.•y .5, 19H I iluntincltcart 13�-c'IC,ir, �'ki. kF:oUES'Vt 'I'n- porItAt a portton of the main April 25, 1981 bul'J i riq Lo In! oonstructed with :aor'ca J'ucyt icJt: yar-d on both lc�Nt":s 'rownlof Spec! Et r :ric�eR. tilan, Area Onc 1A��*Ali*ION Loc:aLad at tbu sold.-hc��st c�F:NwttAL VIM: Meth Brut Density cornor of 11th ;tt:ruet and 1t�►sScic:"nt id1 s Olive Avenue.. !A U�'rTI V,_M�`� � i . 269 Acres Vaic ant r The staff is recoinending that the Commission deny Conditional Exception r h1r,. $1-17, a request to permit a zero side yard setback on both sides of a 25 ft. lot and to allow an increase in the maximum lot coverage from 50 - 56 percent. 2.0 GENERAL THEgA . XQH: Conditional Exception No. 81-17 leas been r•e'ferred to the Planning Com-. . mission by the Hoard of Zoning Adjustments. This application is a ; r.equeat to allow a zero side bard setback on both sides of two of the four contiguous lots located in the Townlot Specific Plan Area and to aaac allow an increase in the site coverage from 50 - 56 percent . This proposal would allow four units on individual lots with common walls at . the property line establishing a four unit side-by-side complen. c. Aftor reviewing the Proposed project, the staff has identified the following issues: I . this the applicant denmonst.t:ated a hardship in order to just:i fy i.l. granting of a conditional excep .iota? ^'�" A•/M 230 • }1pS ,1 :a : r . sir,,, r s�'�:,.� • ti If i 14 yy ;^; mob •. r bl,r i V hr �• . RY + Two u 7 46 CS 81-1 I " ' Is the granting of the conditional exception necessary for the prebarvation and enjoyment of they applicant 's property rights? E1tYlttt'�N1lRbfyAL ST,�S a Pursuant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the requested conditional exception is a Class v Categcricsl AsApption. BRINQ. UM. Mfig, .12 .e�-AND G.ffit�.ER�L MAN. 129219.T1.0: Subject property is located on the southeast corner of filth street and olive Avenue in the old Town specific plan, District one. subject propeRrty is presently vacant of developr cent and Is designated on the General plan an Medium Density Residential . . The propeirties to the north, east, south, and test of the subject site s are also sona,d Townlot Specific Plan, Area one, designated on the General Plan as Medium Density Residential. and are developed with singles family and multi-family residentl.al units. b.e!L-ANAW 15 L The applicant ' s request is to allow the development of a four unit complex, each on individual 25 ft. Iota having common walls along the prbp+rrt libe of all -of the units. The center two units would have a zero �t line on both sides of the property. They Townlot Specific plan pr*sently allows a zero lot line concept between two parcels, howeVesr, the opposites aides yard of each unit must have a minimum 5 ft. side yard setback. The applicant is requesting that the center two units have the zero lat line concept along both sides property lines. This in essence would create a 4-unit attached complex. The applicant has also requested that the permitted site coverage be increased from ga - 56 percent. Numerous single family homes have been developed under the Townlot . Specific plan since its adoption in 1976 . This ordinance allows fog,' datachod units having a 3 ft* side yard on either aide: and attache units with a zero lot line along a common property boundary with 5 ft. side yard along the opposite aide of each unit. The original intent of this ordinance was to allow single family homes on each 25 ft. lot in the area, whip providing some meaningful separation between single units or units comprised of no more than two side-by-side. The staff concurs that the proposed project will create an extremely bulky development. These four units attached side-by-side are proposed to be constructed threw stories high. The staff feels that this will create a 3-stogy high wall, almost 100 feet long . < < - .-W icant of this request has answered the four following questions � ' application foram In this manner . ' . „t, Vag e t Owe Three CE U-17 ' IV ghat exceptional ciryVM*tanQes apply to pat;i t:iors property t ineludin.,. , st"t shap6, topo ra hy, Location, or surroundings? that deprives it ' of privileges norml y en j Oyead? •t t;1 tii c:d I ' e None 20 Will t-be 66ndition'41 exception constitute a grant of special �s privilege inconsistent with normal 11mitaticMR? No 1. Why is this conditional exception necessary for the preservation and enjoyewsht of one or mare substantial property rights? • Array rs ` The ,plan shown presents a better usage of the lineal ground area available on the site, It converts the unusable 3 ft. side yard into a usable court yard and 6 ft. side yard . 4 . Mate .reasons why the granting of tble conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare? ', ,wer$ in complianco with front and rear sertbacka, and height requirements, the projavt is laid out v1suelly not to appear to 'be connected from tim front or tear view. There is arceas for Fire, police, and public utilities fros6., both front and rear, and will not be materially detrimenta: 7 to the public: welfare. The above answers do not demonstrate hardship related to the size, shaper, topography, location, or surroundings which are required for the granting of a conditional exception. T' .e applipant has indicated that the granting of•. 'i+hi s conditional exceptions will allow for a more usable sides yard, when in fact the code provides for a zero lot line concept with 5 ft . opposites sine yards. Therefore,,' this concept In already provided for by the Ordlnsance ' Code, however, limiting the number of units side by side to two. Staff aralysia Indicate thit' the applicant has not demonstrated a hardship nor is this conditional exception necessary for they pre:seevation and en- joyment of the applicant' s property, there:fore, the staff is. recommending that the Commission dery Conditional. Exception Nc. 81-17„ Based on the above analysis and the following findings, the staff r-e umen'd that the Planning Commission deny Conditional Exception No. F1141)Jffl_4§EQR DSHIALe 1 . since the Townlot Specific Plan allows for individual detached units or a zero lot line development on 25 ft , lists in the Town.lot Area , 1 hvrc Is no exceptional circumstances unique to they petitioned pi +iperty that, deprives it of privileges normally enjoyed. r r SI .r d �If v1' ; ,p .0 Ira *' P1'. • } �.��.` 1 + y`r r T ri b +i.l+ `'.��i} �'�i ,`S 1,llr •, ,•1'r ''A .r+,, ' ,.. � y V 1' yy� �, 1'' { '1`, ��}i" .i'*IFr F'* fff"� el "Cl 4147 Since the T,t wnlat Specific Plan allows for zero lot ling dovelo"Wnt, a minimum of $ Ft, separation bs item every other writ, the ralWaqq cf this couditianal exception would constitut* a gr4nt of spoix I trivil"o inconsistent with normal 11mitationov. '". 3. The Tovt let dpacif ie Plan alloch for the deeplop"ntr of these individua.l 25' fte lots, therrafore, th1s conditional exception is >! not necessary for the prenecvatlor, and enjoymen of one or more subst4at ie l property rights. Area Map ?.* Attof Plan received and dated AVr11 3, 1981 r. 1 -Ir-- • ow sob Mi. 11 c , 14 194-701 . 714 894•T ( 7308 Cewfr DWw. • Hamlin.qwm ca& h nrni�t 92647 ac . 1 l'hrarrlaps Brk • CgrrW CAW s WeRpriWO * Vim Alum# • RWho Mw1k R lnwoiAr • San &nwrdim k, MmUngtou beach City ccwtoil 31 P. o. Wx Ito bmUngtan Macho CA 92649 Dear Msabars of tba City Council t Mr are• ►1 Cm&tioaal focoption No. 61-17 a no. tl-14. our a+pial is b"W qPOR the intenvotation of 210mlot 'Specific Flaw - Ana Oftr Article 935, Paragraph 59356.4. sub paragraph (it) in t1* .lost ianteme, which we have not been able to ra mLve intixparetation of this pi OWmph from the Planning 1O wa'at.- it is the feeling of our attorney and ourselves that this lino allow Biro lot line oansttructica. Nb plan to disc+ess this With the City Attorne'y# Gail Button an soon sbe raturas !r" va�ativn. iM 1 ft"ident, Corona Mvelcv,at Co. AID ). _1 I do�,/. , , / • / I,/,••, 1� f / / • I CP Of 00 to , \,\,�, t ,/,• , ��• f � j/ � ' i!/ ' I '•' / t f • ', /'� / . •/� IJ I f mn I �/ I'I I I /• / �r � OF r I , op / ' ' ' ' ' /•,OF /• �� �j /'• I••' 4� f rI S r ' 10 MENU • c 1 r ` •/r .• jib � � x'F•,r L•q r1 � i� �. iA\ 4�N9 ' Ail + 'i , �� 1 '� ,'•�(,4,P + ,y-r 1• k`, dis,,fir A T 41t�} � #��y ����a�l� may'rM P�t a' .�� k` � M 1 r, �1 ��• �'+t' A,•�*+�raTf�,yY M.r "jf- SJ ^ �. , N� } Rr�� ��R,ai fry to t§'�f I rr I`��� 1• 1� 1 'ti �rA �{'1 h I�'t A. ' AM 1 �r►4 r ark f „r ,s: 1 �. e �� � i. �'• �� Nr�'T�l I�+,f^,' � r' A�r�t,Q1 , �� �N S i' � „r 7. _ ''•� AF1�•i�r� � � i ,'•i+'r� ., �'4 .il � • .7 y � . , ��' .�'� ,,�"N+1 .. �'c � M Y .Ri w �.h.��t. } R� .,3 ��f' " �r�r'�. I -� r�, i r �.t� � •.i� y �� � �,•,�,*�.y�J �I �i A,�I 11�4 � r� �6; '� � r� �• by ' ti,'�' ly�,f� r. �', � , .1P1 'II� • I�..CA ��." ';`M q `'1 iu���r It .. r , 1 1' ", A' '� ,. i A 'L.• M• A, n ':` .It:� �,1 �. 1•�7,A 1 �� rAr. •rA� \n rll . '. �' '^ L'rR�MM�'h? ::�,�y� � �, ,Y�i•IL�,K I,., .,'-w •f:0,:'41•-V"J AP , ,I lkp'•..Jlaa- : I" CJR CITY C ! ,lN IL? CTION ,' +� r •i 1 a '. Aeril 24, 1981 ., Date 40WOld fg: . Honorable Mayer and City Council �Md by: Charles W. 'Thompson, City Administrator a :y 'off„;;,��,j;�,'y,,, •�'° Dsportme nt of Development Services &*OAt APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-18 f , fttmw t of Inue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions, Attahments: =Imw 2r 16AUE Transmitted for •,dour consideration is an appeal to Conditional ' Exception No. 81- 18 a request to permit a 10 " side yard set- back on both sides of 25 f t. lots in the Townlot area and to allow an increase in the maximum lot coverage from 80 ,W 56 percent. r; The Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommends that the � City `Council uphold the rlanninq Commission' s denial of Con- ditlonaJl Exception No. 81-18. Appellants Robert L. Carona 7308 Center Drive • Huntington Beach, Calif . 92647 Applicants Corona Development Company, Inc. 7308 Center Drive Huntington Beach, Calif . 92647 Location: Southeast Corner of 18th Street and Orange Avenue. Request: To permit a portion of the main building to be Constructed with 10 ' sideyard setbacks - on both sides and to allow an increase in the permitted lot: coverage from 5G to 56 percent. R=_tU f&J_ COMISSICIN AQ112A ON A _L 7, 19 1 : ON MOTION BY DER AND SECOND nY .SCHUMACHER CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81- Y 8 WAS DENIED BY T14E FOLLOWING VOTE WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: AYES: Bannister, Winchell, Porter, Schumacher, Bawer NOES: Kenefick ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None swo 4ti� + r +RR'`nyR; +4R . Y': �' i � + `, r 1 �. ll �ro YYr`# y `r•• '' •1 ry � ' � t•�L � 1( l°Y., 0. r 1 � 'p '' IST�*= y rye,✓tL r�A + '" Iryr'.'tdw i I. Sind the Townlot Specific Plan allows for ind::vi.dual detached ., units on separate parcels or units developed with zero lot line concept on two contiguous 25-foot parcels, there are no exceptional circumstances unique to the petitioned property that derives It of the privileges normally enjoyed . 2. Since the Townlot Specific Plan allows for zero J_ot lines dev- elopment with a minimum of five (5) foot separation between every unit, the granting of ti:is conditional exception would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsiatent with normal limitations . r 3. The Townlot Specific plan allows for the development of these individual 25-foot lots ; therefore, this conditional exception Is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one oL• more substantial property rights. 2 irliSSION• The applicant is resquestinq to allow the development of a four unit project, each unit can an individual 25-foot lot, having common walls along the property line between each of the units. The center two units will have a zero lot Tina setback on both sides of the property. � This in. essence would create a four' unit attached project. The ap- plicant 'has also requested that the permitted site coverage he in.- creased from 50 to 56 perccnt. The Townlot Specific plan presently allows a zero :lot line concept between two parcels, however, the opposite side yard of each unit must bave a minimum :;_ ee yard setback of not less than 5 :Ewer. This would allow no more than two attached units in any one complex. Numerous eingle family Tiomes have been developed under the Townlot Specific Plan ' since .its adoption in 1976. This ordinance allows for detached units raving 3 ' foot side yards on either side and attached units with zero l,ot line along a common property boundary with the 5 foot side yard setback on , the opposite side of each unit. The original intent of this ordinance was to allow single family homes on 25 Foot lots in this area, wh{le•.nroviding some reasonable separation between singles units, or units epmprised of not more than two side by side . At the Apr31 7, 1981 planning Commission meeting, the Commission quesstloned the conditional exception procedure for trying to accomplish this concept. The Commission also note that during' a meeting between ,the `applicant:, planning Staff, and an ad roc committee of the planning C61mi.ssion. several months, prior to the meeting , they applicant irdl-- ,cated -hot he would be willing to prepare a study and possible coder amendment in orde i to, allow titis zero lot line concept as he is presenting it. Th" applicant has not submitted a study or code amendment regarding this matter . Therefore, the Commission requested that the staff research the Specific Plan District and reevaluate U'ss standards therein for the purpose of a possible code: amendenent, takino into consideration the implementation station of the presented con- cept' The staff indicated it would be six to eight weeks before a study and proposed code amendment could come back to the Planning Commission. ,•r)p• Y/, 4•'�' �SY`f, t 4 J w+ + t r�Iea iY Ih " • ,d f' 1 �•!' ��. r�i 4 � Fi t.""`,r �t7F;i f � „� �", ",y r: .a �� , 4 �} Nr , �'' aNArA.- .1, + f • _'�,' lhik, 7 �� ��'�'.�y�r'rY'+ ',v�n•T•.ayK+ K�M, F �� . a i rrq'' q `nKiP�• . r.l '!V+PY}�'/iMri ',1 a L+W.rx� •M'/'Y'YFN t:.'riJ 1,r+hr.r +w. � � 1.71 1 l.. pureoant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the requested conditional, exception is a Class V categorical exemption. JWIJ2I1M §OU];gE Not applicable. ALTZBOATIVE ACTIUN: The City Council may consider overturning the Planning Commission ' s denial of Conditional Exception No . 81-18 and allow the development of the four siege by ride attached units as proposed by the applicant . ,511MATING l 1. . Area Map 2. Staff Report dated April 7 , 1981 3 . Letter of Appeal Respectfully submitted: ' em ea W. E+alin, Director Dartment of Development Services CWT:JWP:SMB:gc .ri �_ '1'� I.'IFi 1 r rM1Y" IlryfVV11 ' 1w M . r � vLr'y1' ',/r i : •r.~ .M•�"+F',..r r M '/ rl '. �� 1Y.11 h•, beach W V tr.Af. EPORY.-I" TO Planning rommi ssion pRCUS Development Services DAM April 7, 1981, GMXT72M . it7(QUU-10N,I!9A- 81 (referred bar Board of ZoNing Adjustments) U LIgM's Cortina Development Co. , Inc . 7308 Center Ave . February 25, 1981 Huntington: Beach, Ca. I� a'c : To permit �. `QAJgRXPR12CUSINQ PME, portion of the main April 25, 1981 building to be constructed with zero toot side yard on both sides . Z,�E: Townlot Specific Plan, ARea one LAWW IQN: Loca ted at the southeast corner of M 18th Street and orange Ave . GENERAL PLAN: Medium � Density Residential��: . 269 acres EX T Vacant J 2 0_ S!VgQj§ ' P.. S` are : The staff is recommendingthat the Commi�ssi .an den Conditional Excepl.ion Y No.' 81-18, a request to permit a zero side yard setback on both aides of a 25 ft. lot and to allow an increase Li the maximum lot eo,werag!e f rom 50 - 56 percent. .a v � OEUML, IKEO MAT_ION: f:o�dit tonal Exception No . 61-18 has been referred to the planning Com- missi.on by the Hoard of Zening Adjustments. This application is a rcwqueet to allow a zero Ride yard setback on both sides of two of the four conticluous lots located in the Townlot Specific Platy Area and to also allow an increase in the .site coverage from 50 - 56 percent . This proposal would allow four units on individual lots with common walls at the property line establishing a four unit side-by-side complex. After r•rview•a nq the prcafoscad project, the staff has identified the ro I Iowtno J nslle. .m 1 . tl.i:• 1 llo . ppl iv.i1+t it h-yrdship in ardor to justify the tit -ml i no is( .i ootitl t l 1 ona ( (-xv apt t nn7 w , r" '..lot fib Lt k .My "• �r ', ,.r dYrT"•�'•a�I,r.}w,i•,Y •r!. �t Is 1 he to ,►nr i nci I ►1- t I►c rand i t iotinI oxcepti can nur esnary for the prvarirvat• ior .arid ►:rr joyment of the applicant ' s property rights? 1 "a Purauent to Section 1505 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the raltquested cineitional exception is a Class V Categorical Exemption. fiUH8jQVfi21HU 61HU U§_E r. J.NQ... ANQ. rj&NZH �•..EL, DE SIG N Subloot oraberty is located on the southeast corner of 18th Street and snq �'t 1e in the Uid Town Specific plan, District one, Subject proper•ti in presently vacant of development and is designated on the General Plan as Medium density Residential . The properties to the north, east, south, and west of the subject site alre also zone] Townlot Specific plan, Area One, designated on the Oener'al plan as Medium Density Residential and are developed with single family and multi-family residential units. 6. 0....AMVY.SJfi.L The appli►cant ' s request is to allow the development of a four unit complex, each on individual 25 ft . lots having common walls along the property line of all of the units. The center two units would have a . zero lot line on both sides of the property. The Townlot Specific Plan presently allows a zero lot line concept between two parcels, however, the opposite side yard of each unit must have a minimum 5 ft . side yard setback . The applicant is requesting that the center two units have the zero lot line concept along loth side property lines. This in essence would create a' 4-unit attached complex. The applicant has also requested that the permitted site coverage be increased from SQ .- 56 percent . Numerous single family hoanes have been developed under the Townlot Specific Vlan since its adoption in 1976 . This ordinance allows for detached units having a :I ft . side yard on either side and attached units, with .-a zero !ot line along a common property boundary with 5 ft . skin y:itd alonct the apposite side of each unit. The original intent or this% 'ordinance was to allow single family homes on mach 25 ft . lot in tho area,. while providing some mvaningful separation twatween sinelIe units orunit s comprised of no more than two side-by-side. 't•he� ::1 ;►t'f e'c tii'l�t';i that the propo:;cd project will create an extremely hill ky 'f ivs o rout~ units attached side-by-aside are proposed to 1%, tGonotr•uc•t ed t hrve stories high . The staff feels that this will i•r vol c, is .{••ht ivey 111oh via t 1 , almost 100 feet long . 11►. ` ,s11111 il•,sr►i tit I tya :: ► oilti st has :answered the four following questions •is► ! IIV ,11411 Wot ac,►► t ill ill i It t his manner, 1. A�4, r 1• vf �� >+• .y . . r �' '' ° V RA � �++r•,'••�r'., o. �,� ' •fin_ y4 '�����`r '� - .f ,, � � •'� , «,., ti .,fir: �t s'r'*' 1wA.��'p�ht'R�.��� 'T.,..rw..�, f.- '. :r.'. :r.y rr r • ,I.,y, 7 . Throo cc 91.10 �,• 1 . What except• iona 1 circumstances apply to petition property (including site, shape, tope' graphy, location, or surroundings) that deprive it of privileges normally enjoyed? I None t0 will the conditional exception constitute a grant of special w . privilege inconsistent with normal limitations? hany"t No L Why is this conditional exception necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights? jJlfiggr: The plan shown pr•esenta a better usage 'of the lineal ground area available on the site. It converts the unusable 3 ft, side yard into a usable court yard and 6 ft. aide yard. 1 . Mate reasons why the granting of this conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare? In compliance with front and rear setbacks, and height requirements, the project is laid out visually not to apt'rar to be connected from the front or rear vier. There is access for Fire.. Police, and public utilities from both front and rear, and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare . The above answers do not demonstrate hardship related to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings which are required for the granting of a conditional exception. The applicant has Indicated that the granting of thIs conditional exceptions will allow for a viore usablia side ard, when in• fact the coda provides for a zero lot line concept with � ft. bVpoaite sides yards. Therefore, this concept is already provided for by the Ordinance code, however, limiting the number of units side by side r to two Staffs ana l yni s indi oal os t-ha L• the applicant has not demonstrated a hair dshill nr)r• it; t hi x c ondi t- iona l oxreption necessary for the preservation and on- Anyiowmil (if' the. :rlipl iivair t ' :, property, thrrrefore, the staff is recommending tlr.:t t1m, c•cwumitAnicyrt deity Conditional exception No. 81-17 . tc.r:�c �1 c�tr f ii.• ,rl�wcr •itr.� I y:= i :a ;anti t-he I of lowi ntl f i nti i ncls, the tataf f r I'V1111a:WIrld t ha I t Ira.• v l.i tin i nt r t'onuiq s:t i can deny rand i t i:aria 1 Exception No . F INo !F 01t_ t)F:N,i AI, 1 . :tirwo PLiss allows for iyidividua.l detached units Ill. •r ;:c•r:y lot 1 i 110 d:wo l opmont• on 25 Ir t . logs in the Townlot Area, t hor f% r :: 110 oxt-ollt i rm'l I vi r-ollmStally y unique to the petitioned I�r �•lw•r t y 11.•11 cit,pt r vc•;x it of pr! vi leges normally enjoyed. i fy I��� �i 5 �h.y�"ry��,�„� r •11 � 1wy/I#f�eFTY� �� { (, `�,+y. ��y uy ���1� �� � < i�1. �.. �. �� ���+Y•, � J �,n n!� �'ik'MS D' �"P• .;� Y' �r. M� i wl� � .. �� �� i��� ���L� q�,e���l ar■ ,h ��I�,,, ��} � y I '�y11�"h S 'k�� '�yl,,,W F.�„ i�i �,� „" ' •_ I j } I ��ti/� �S, i I ,�`.7}1' Kr�y,,� r 1�1"�,I r iP �t • r .�7 '� �# " t �. r+ .. . • 41 y �f r� • ,r.. r ,,,, „�pyCrll�•p•.uw�•,�.nM•.lyip�r„n�••r��y...,. '.lr.� r; ''•�i�i-.�'P' _.�q�0."�F'. l,•'��5'r�rw•;.,,;R � ,�w ,, 'ti �. ,7R+,�r'` �w. ..�.•,.y,�� N� � 00*1 dr 2. Since the Townlo+t Specific Plan allows for zero lot line development, J With a minimum of 5 ft. separation between every other unit, the grantAng of this conditional exception wound constitute a grant r of sp*clal privilege inconsistent with- normal limitations. 3 . The Towtilot specific Phan allows for the development of these individual 25 ft* lots, therefore, this conditional exception is Obt fteces*ary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights. ` 1 . hrea Map 2. Site Plan received and dated April 3, 19FIl i � i r��,�yy{' ����\M I• I ��..� 1 �ti 1•* , , -YT . M1Y ,a • ' i 11 w �.i� '!r�'�R�rs � � .f(�.; $ ,v, 'Sri• tit'•.w►•i. � 1� .. ' r•' . �I•. i � Mg Ctnte/ Drive. • 14unti►►Vopt &-ach, ("alf fivnia 91647 Nwtk HoOpe kl • Hemet • R hor side • . Fj Bermsndow k: Wil x8# 1"1 ao. Q i i w S . Huntington Beach City Councila=;,% P. O. Box 190 n � Huntington Be*ch# CA 92648 f,' CA aee Vear Msakwics of the City Councils we are-appnaling Conaitional, Xxception No. 81-17 A No. 61-18. Our a al is based upon the L-Sto rpretution of Townlot Speoj'.`ic Plan Arta One# Article 935, Paragraph 691S6.4, Bub Para,;rra 4h 0.0 in the last sentences, which we have not been able t+•. rc ceive interpretation of this paragraph from the Planning Depa�rtmnt. it Is the feeling of our attorney and ourselves that this line allm' a &&ro lot line umnstruction. We plan to discs this with the City Attorney, Gail Hutton as saoa th sat�xne vacation. Ar 1 President, Corona pevelopwat Co. f Yf V r 9 '1• a I 'Y No, 4 ' 1 a1 !{ yp ��'{:� .'(s,.�G;Y':' ,tl',Ylf'"dt • . .= p, ',,y, ...,......... " 1,.•' ,Y •---y�.r� w�wai�.r.+ `� Y �y!r 'r 1 rt ! ~ 04 Publish �1 23, 1�81 pro; r t` WJTl'VwE OF WIC NEARING AppM TO 7K KNIAL OF CF #61.18 'ICE tS !DENY GIM tMt A pub!is herd ng wi l i be held by the City Caur I l Of the City of Komi ngtorn Ruch s in the Counci I Charttber of tho Civic Canter, .t Nfttington %MChs at the hour of 7:30 R.N. , or as soon theniafter as peailblo cm y' NOW tt* _ Ath . day of Mey 1�61 . for the purpose of considering An appeal to #ha planing Comission's dotial of Conditional bcoption No. 81-18, a request to permit a portion of the min building to be raksthucted with 3*ro foot side yard on both sides. The subject property is located at the soutImst corner of 18th Street and Orange Avenue. A legal description is on f11# in the Departmat of Iavelopeent Services Office. K All iNIrreat(O persona ire invited to attend said herring and express their 6PINions for or against said __ .mot F..s further intcrmtion trey be obtMined flVe the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Ste t, NuntingUm B"Chs California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATEDAw4l2g-.jal CITY OF NUATINGTON BEACH By; Alicia of. Mentrorth City Clerk i,4f�0, A � y w. Al 001, 4. fit•,. 1 •r sm MAN Now f�' M L � } RrATIS(WtALWORMA b ad ar es claw 40 0#240 MAW r,,r ,1, rtT',JrTO'J MACH i PLAr",J I!M'= PRE of P .tr�►Tt�H �* Waft:rrt A�-fie .t, 41hter '" t Arm of ""i.w jai dt d4 d"A - w w"awa{wo a dumb at lumsoh sib."A Poo try aw bmo uw 41 do rbIft WOW wow" )MOIL RF ' SW 1 rage A*P*gw"or der~at ow a we we rt"ri ob oAdick.P h1 tbo Cfty at Ifg-41 f vj at ��fl� IM tsar tIN #AmmmwwC�IAMd- f.r, �r�i rrMllM A or loom 1r WWA aattomw w rarA st�l!rr A �r t - Im of pst trMt wub"bom t il'a, 11 K •off W""wow it w brw oldim Md,I i-i d MA pub. tkbw Ott try iaormh am ONE*of 01"l�r o oro Ii R the o! WMA 1a i"146 t#K Sri ww w /WW*Of PN*M fiat ow fump- ive in In*ad noom � .a.t. • .......... .. .... .. ........................ .. .. .... .. • .. .... .. .......... .. .................. t+x�wrt�. "„AR ! ,4kp,. 44 01 Nil QA 0* MCI To am To SCWWLN PUSUC main CIZU'l OFVICI DAT I i 41 0101 win TRs ArrAcm LvcAL mtcz no rm I set a are Atmochad All 'Will follow No AP's PIOVAiAl b4partftnt *, Appeal OOOIPM Other A&Vtlm -of Inviramontal status (a) #000' "far to #SMA gar Oults"mal takomtikm. if *' Pie4ss trommit exact ceding to be required in the legal . i , '.�, V , , y�',!. �"d• ,! l� +Ig Q � .ry":Y;ita; r : ' '+0'° ` �`n., , ry. = •.� ' r a,, I MORO- ,{ a �►� r r.--�. _,�: 23-1.51-11 ,.) L%Ntw 4mm LZ h-18 thw"]aw E Pa��h tirq y Cal 407 18th £t r"t 92647 b"dh► 011.E 92648 `J. 1• ,;.. � ' Y1Y1 13�1�17 23�1.'Sl"'13 � MCKMM , :.� Calve m 403 18th 8ttwt 4 C*W o wt. -Lo4 ]'fir-l7 33-151-15 228 '�VU LSD god Sts i. •Y ,9+t ompo r Coif V81 lC• t3"1if wl ltsslty , 9 3 92M 21M Win Street .�3'196r+05 23-LWJA Suite 250 L�� stave fto1w MI wO ! 8s+�ah� 3u Oft Apt A 92648 Cmli� _ 23-151-16 1tM1 tit i�D�i �t/li o b351 Dsflarom Drive 323 17th SUmt 409 18th Strwt > 1xun� Susan, �iE 8o►�rch, Cali � �botr beer►, P.alif tubV 92640 92640 23-156-10 23-1G-20 23�-M-17 'is." w ri�Utw JbW L 14M Dmvid C Miatmaa 11311 lwwdLw Iwom .1 M 8troot 4u loth 8 um1 boadu Calif �. Coif 1ntingbc .R1if : dls 92 926" f / 1W,3-"�1'• `r13 23-U6-31 ;} 23-LU-28 .-49 KXWActtk 1 7 s t 6O51 MUnrom Erive 413 1ft Stet J+ r1b�n RMwlr Cola! '947 Calif �2zmbqwn 648 ° Calif 4 23- 5I-09 23-153-19 fcAmm L FUoc ew�ly �l�aae 41�9 18trh St�ws�C at � ' �. wl 84fta aa, Cl if H�tirr;�tan , C�+lit 3U� 17#h Striwt 927a1 92641� jawt� bm MIGN Calif 92648 156-16 J L you 406 >ftk Stet GOOZVe 14 WoOds et. &I i JU5 11th Btrot '-i ig -4 Coif 415 18th Str-et i1untUwma 11 . Calif 92"0 kumt..ington Brh, Calif 94640 9264d /Mat etd Aeu d�, Al •,� � �-try*}• . � � r ti x r 61 r 1 23-155--15 I. / 1 Claim M & �d cc #81-18 21942 r� to trio ANWC ► 24 L% be Calif 1 � I 23-155--16 L t�1�1�Ms ill fella G UMAX 417 i 9M mmodim A+m M32 � Avrcaea a . CUXVW Citw, Cali! W�l t�0 Calm �1�i46 90 93 k p a.ms Jr �y.y y�+r���baec 1�1 i �,Jana �! 414 • 323 Vla1 lAcb Slid 326 17'th $bit • ►e�lii ► 8sewh, ,fit b Bah, Calm n Beach, Calif 926U 93663 92648 23-151-28 23-155-07 23-157-03 cvwAgn L uw*m DAL A Lightest ffi!as Btlaustin 4 2 15 8tsaatilt 237 QM1 1821 WhitmMi Lmn Wr durinyiacnamscho C114 ma4met 8 , M,lL,,f 0" 226" Santa Anne CmW92705 155"00 .3-157-04 (kowcy Stew a� It Canna 517 16th Stt"t 10071 - - 1 live lwntiny n &OW24 CAI MmUngtoa~ mmuh, Calif lmtirl�oe'- esach, Cal J 944#3 92645 92646 � - 01 2' 2.55R10 23-1.57--05 '�� Ot Diana J 8bwt Karl lm UIL lu Wbmth Lane Jan. ff 5 rib l t s t1i andrit Calif 304 17th Shot Atk A :aan 1i , t 9412 926116 Ountix;Wn Roth, Calif 92448 1wtigjtoa Moog* as 23 IL55-U 23-157-06 410 UsinS pors Jan TVmmkwff � "' 'tm sass%, "43 Dolum Wive 304 17th Stroot !0264�' Bier p y Coll I ntitcr tiara ftwh, Calif 95969 92648 ��-155-01 23--155-12 IjAvd 197 S Rl Ciwlr 16205 � Codxm � sad %603 1�ti�-UY 23-1.'�5~l3 jbm Sts"Um M"t Gil co 6901 visbs Dad. WL Drive M 20th Stzmet tAmtiYNtm 4 ,, WJ yd647 92648 ,��'�r L�AS+� .,,A, �1� � h'jl�y��,� �1 �.� '�•r � �� NI � ri �{ iy„ �� A ea� i':� +r7 '�� fp' r���" 10— `,, ��i�• 'N7� I :1, r557��' v�0+� � � 1� fy �;r 1�+ �A,1 � �• '7 .,+ � Jr L f�1 N � r � i � F' , •,. 10 Iwo �,���� � p1e��.'�� ,� �rf y",11��' A��:, � •� n• ,w•��,��..�.}rr� ht�q. �li �'��� i i i 2 r �' o II,"•� r 1 ,y , •��, � .-way., �r,•����., �,� � � _ �•• r 1 L 1 f i I ' r � 11 r r • t k r, 1,rp�' ♦ 19 ry lh,ri,�pir" .r, ,w 1'3'd ,• �I r` /,r 1M A�v , W .f y �JPr 4 idy7 ';,r ''1KrT 1` '�'i I ��„p� y��'r'r1', 1��'•, j�Y ir'�• �"� ! . r',4 Yr''. �i.. � � �w�t'� �, JT "k i.a}Sr�Y.yf I �i.r y T r•rl '�y 1.1^ `"r � ,f' `♦ �.• L ri �:'r rt7^^' 4 r� r a � I � ;•1 17 00 y1 ,yam• %},�,'.��[y ',�'a ,,,? ' 'I ; � M07M OR IU4LIC N"Nan APPIM TO TIN 061111AL Of CA NO.91.16 FJla•�� .,r �'rtl,M ,i , . r r,• , t NAB M M WHEN OI%MN*a■fwft liwriO WN be Mir of tIM tom/a""of dM a"10""Opp"ftlik, ' Ili*Oe*4Mewef7180Pa '&ar vat"&Nos rsPON" os MM+iN Ow 40 wY of Iw1►.1N1 far Oa pwPert of eoWder` .,. •ur' ;: ift W 44"t#an P%Mft 06"M rd"16 4WAW of Oft"W ii ),,,4;;: " i,oM p f�M.!r1•tIM,M ra*N M 114111 a ral im of do min r bombs"re ro NWIN Oft a"Bret dde WOO ON be" n5 0006 TW PdJM+t IN PM Ir lesolM at Oe mwW aea awrim •. 5. of IS*i1b"am Awnrr. A NW daw4pNea N ea All kowtow io"M wM WOW to atOWW"M haft anal Main Olftbw for or 0100 aid"OW. a y 11M Flom 1 IN web"my he Ob"WM tram the OW40 of ft 4 ONY Chrk,+3M MWn!!port,Mundmom Mash,CA fly � pawl ool CIITTY O iMUN INO'TON DRAW s'w 0" ALICIA N.WEN7YIIDi1TM ' CN1r CINk 'a"t•'' . Pub.AprN 3&IN1 N".Mftok Old. w 1 ;, A 17 iHIrnr, x-C.O NC1L Superior Court OF T4+k �... �� STAn.oF CALIFORNIA In and for the County of Orange t■Y1`X� VTY OF 4IUNTINSTON BEACHip 61 TY CLERK PR2F OF rU L!CATI0b Hearin! 81-17 State of C40fornia ) County of Orange le' JeannI4 Le Thalsas That 1 nm&ad at all tines herein mentioned was it eltiven of i the llnite,el fttarWa over the sgr of twenty-ones yearn,and thr.t 1 � am not a party to, not inte-.voted in the shove entitled matter; i Out I am the principal ck+rk of the printer of the Huntington Beach Ind. RQVI* r a rv,wapeapw of gtseral circulation,publiabed in the City of Huntington Beach County at Ore► p rod which n-meppaaper is publi.hed for the dWatination of local news and Intelligence of a general chantc- ter, and °.vhich newspaper at aU time% herein nwntioned had end s1JU has a bona fide subveription list of puying subscribers. erne which rwnrwtpsMr hse beers eetablirhed, printed and pub- 11AW at regular intervals in the said County of Orange for n period excerAing an-t year; that the notice, of which the t.nn*sed Is a printed copy, has been ptibl+shed in the regular rrs e . mWe a m of said newrpymr, and not in any supplement thsr",on the tolbwing dates,to writ: ! September 24, 19111 F l r 1 Mrt,ify(or declare) under penalty of perjury that the fut*go- � Ipg Is true sod correct. + i Dow at-.-Or.Aarx.Aroms... .................... ....... . .... .. .... s:jrehrrr ` I -•' r Y REOUE ` FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Daze September 21 , 1981 ubmkudtoo: Honor stile Mayor and City Council • Charles W. Thompson, City ' n st at o l�� Submitted by. Char a ho-nps n, i y Admi i r o �20 10 N"red by: James W. Patin, Director of Development Servicespenc e Super; REFERRAL OF AN APPEAL TO T�iE PLANNING COMMISSIONNIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTIONS 81 -17 AND 81-18 mom ent of law. Rewmrt wKhr ian, Analysis, Funding Source, Altsmartive Actions,Attsahwonts: .... +... r �r•+i+w r WV ST T NT 7S UE: Transmitted for the Council 's consideration is the Planning Com— mission' s antion taket on the referral of an appeal of the Planning Commission ' s denial on Conditional Exceptions 81,17 and 81-.18 . These applications are a request to allow the construction of single family dwellings in the Towt+lot area with a double-zero aide yard setback. And to also allow are increase over the allowed 50% site coverage to 56% Site coverage. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council uphold Its original denial of Conditional Exceptions 81-•17 and 81.-18 with the findings as outlined under the Analysis section of this report. APPELLANT: Robert L. Wrona 7308 Cent-ir Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 APPLICANTS Corona Development CompanZ. Inc. 7308 Center Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92647 ' 1A)CATiION: Southeast corner of 18th street and Orange Avenue and southeast corner of llth Street and olive Avenue. RROUBST: To permit a portion of the main building to be constructed with zero side yard setbacks on both sides and to allow an increase in the permitted lot coverago from 50% to 5 6 i . .U21 ArMON 99 Augun IL 12 _ A NOTION WAS MADE BY PAONS AND SECONDED BY SCHUMACHER TO RECOMEND T4 THE CITY COUNCIL A DENIAL WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS, BY THE 1r't7W WING YCTE s t i Y � , ' r Ok CC 81-w17 & 81-18 Page 2 AYES: Bannister, Paone, Winchall, Porter, Schumacher NOESs None ABSENT: Kenefick, Mahaffey ABSTAIN: None XJN IN.§ FOR ,QENJ&A ,: 1 . Since the Townlot Specific Plan allows for individual detached units on a zero lotline development on 25 foot lots in the Townlot area , there is no exceptional circumstance unique to the petitioned property that deprives it of privileges norrnal- ly enjoyed. 2. Since the Toiwi&lot Specific Plan allows for zero lotline develop- ment with a minimum of five foot separation between every other unit, the granting of this conditional exception would consti- tute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with normal limitations . 3. The Townlot Specific Plan allows for the development of these + individual 25 foot lots, theresfore, this conditional exception ' is not, necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights . i At the April , 7, 1981 Planning Commission meeting, the Pla►nninq Com- mission denied Conditional Exceptions 81-17 and 81-18, a request to � ' allow the construction of single family dwellings in the Townlot area built with a zero side: and setback on both sides of intericr lots. The applicant was requesting to allow the development of a four unit project, each unit on an individual 25 foot lot, having common walls along the property lines between each of the units. The center two units would have a zero lotline setback on both sides of the property. This, in essence, would create a four unit at- tached project„ The applicant also had requested that the. permitted site coverage be increased from SO% to 56%. After considerable discussion, the Planning Commission denied thiA request based on the fact that the applicant had failed to demonstrate a hardship in that there were: no unique circumstances related to the property that deprived the property owr vr from normally enjoyed property rights. The applicant appealled this decision to the City Council and at l the. Nty. 40, 1981 City Council meeting, the Council conside3rad this appeal. At that time the City Council referred both Conditional. Exceptions 81-17 and 81-18 back to the Planning Commission to be heard in conjunction with Code Amendment 81-5. The Council directed staff to prepare a revision, to Code Amsndxnent 81-5 which would alloy a double ia*ro eider yard concept in the Townlot specific won t M CE 81-17 6 81-18 Page 3 Plan area. Code Amendment. 81-5 is an amendment to the Townlot and +Oldtown Specific Plans which clarified and resolved a! number of minor problems within these two ordinance code sections. The staff prepared an addendum to Code Amendment 81-5 which de- veloped provisions for a double zero side yard concept in the Townlot area . After considerable discussion_ and a number of public hearings by the Planning Commission, the Commission approved .ode Amendment 81--50 however, it tabled tbo portion of the amendment which dealt with the double zero side yard concept. The planning Commi ss.1on felt that this concept was not a viable development al- ternative for the Townlot area. This code amendment has been scheduled for the Council ' s review at the September 21, 1981 City Council meeting, Based on the fact that the Commission had tabled the portion of Code Amendment 81-5 which would have allowed the double zero side yard concept and further that the Commission could not find a hardship related to. the land, the Commission voted to recommend to the City Council that their previous action of denial be upheid and that these two c, tditiondl exceptions be denied by the City Council . OMIROMENTF T, ATUS: Pursuant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the requestea conditional exceptions are a Class 5 categorical exaiapti;;n, i FUNDING SQ CE: Not applicable. The C!,ty Council m&y consider overturning the Planning Commission ' s original denial of these two conditional exceptions and its subse- quent recommendation for the Council to deny these conditional exceptions and approve Conditional Exceptions 81-17 and 81-1.8 . The City Council may also consider the re-advertising and holding an additional public heaving on these conditional exceptions . SUPK T N NFO RMON: i 1. City Council Transmittal dated April 24, 1981 2. Planning Comm.iseion Staff Reports dated April 7, 1981 JWP$SB: j 1m P OW ti P •c-'A7i�Y�1rr t mow• - . (714) 994-7541 894.7542 �' r" (714) 894.7545 PSI) 7.108 C:ewer Drbe. 0 Hurilin ►liar; Bt,ach. Gill 4nia 92647 i Iel + .l ` i I � ' I i F1w►r►i►Van Srarh Gardt-n Cwty • Westminsta Vism • Bilwiall + Ri,dm Ncrih Nit Ip-twd • M-tria + Rit►rrsidr Sim Bi-mdrdi►rt, April 18, 1981 , ti Huntington Beach City Council P. C. box 190 ;:a Hunting ton PA&ch, CA 92648 r � � Dear Members of the City Council: ; w- We ar$'appealing CotnditionAl Exception :Co. 81-17 & No. 81-18. Our appeal is baaed upon the interpretation of Townlot Specific Plan - Area Oner Article 935r paragraph P9356.4, Sub Paragraph (ii) in the last sentence, which we have not been able to receive i.ntezpretatio;, of this paragraph from the Planning Department. it is the feeling of our attorney and ourselves that this line allows zero lot lire construction. We plan to discusa this witl i the City Attorney, Gail Hutton as arson site returns from vacatidn. R+a c 1 y V RD i` LEX CORONA Prosidentr Corona Development Co. ,I i .11 � V i mob •'1l' . n. ,1. CITY OF HUNTINGTON Ord"M � INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION rN N"NCTOM OWN To Charles W. Thompson' q � From Jamt.s W , Palin, .Df rector City Administrator Development Services I Subject SUPPLEMENTAL INFO I0N ON ate April 30 , 1981 AGENDA ITE 81y-1'J AND D2 ( C.E. 81- Attached herewith is a letter from Corona tie elc�pment Company, Which has been filed pursuant to a meeting head with Mr . Corona, Gail Hutton and myself on .,%prJ.l 27 . The purpose of that meeting was to discuss an interpretation of the Townlot Specific Plan development standards, at which time I indicated to Mr. Corona that X would concur with a referral back to the planning Commission of these two. conditional ex.- ceptions subject to the Commission 's concurrent review of an amendment W the Townlot Specific Plant. This amendment would propose: allowing zero-to-zero construction, however, the ' letter toes beyond that paint and stipulates that it had been Mr . Corona ' s understanding that his variances would be granted. The Department of Development Services I cannot concur with that statement, nor should the City Council mandate an apprcvtal by the Planning Commission for these applications should { they he referred back to that body„ I have attempted to contact Mr. Corona on this subject since receiving his letter; however, he is ot�t of town and as of the Preparation of this communication no contact I with hiw has been made . Therefore I would only concur with a referral back to the Planning i Commission after Mr. Corona acknowledges that the decision to a mutter of determination of fact to be made by the Planning Commission, as that body is an autonomous commission and a decision should not be mandated j upon them. r X should also nite that both the Attorney 's office and Development ! Services in reviewing these requests felt that the variance they ask for goes beyond .parity and would, in fact, be a grant of special privi- lege. The Council, therefore, might have a difficult time finding the necessary hardship for approval . I will be prepa4to discuss this further with the Council at its y 4 , 1981 meeting, f %df ttachme►rtt � J (, 14) Nw•7 5a1 ef1i) ,W9�i•7541 • 1714) 8V4 ,i4 i or 410 ` if70, Elif'l o t' 7.1{IX C'eiticr 1)rAw. • l li;►► ipgi,-n A-sic h, (.ij1i/jir►Ihl IV2647 /{Mlfllll�hyl �Wlt GirJi-of Grove • WroII inver Vifia 9,N:w it � 1t1�►l/�� h'��rl� I l��Ils�c,��J � I irrHrc � k ica'rsirJr' � ,�nc lir•►rair�licc,� I I *r4A 28, 1901 of Ala ZVOW&A I&MxcA 2000 fit+. • eat MaWewtox Sir CA 92648 N" VVT# : Ivr. 41"W-1a +pa"t Ct pt .1i.raat'or aa, t mutton, CtA* At"nuo AN W"k Rob&r le,s Co p F+ 040 t l Cowan A#wetopwan Ce --A, .* , *pu Rip 1Mr 11! 9100 A. 11. S"t wtaa ae the ca* Attr►rtrrw prr+&wr tr Hoban Zee carols, lews�► POL&s, Est° a and wramber& of *vs NAV AtUrwN lti � ##• Sir44WA: pw aabMLL"d 6V R0640%t Z" CarOM4 I-OC44W at 18" stroat and Orwq ti artd J UA Strwax and OL"Sp wMAA& kg-; pVWt4U dA j0 bean dyad bo Vm P4W4^0M ors 6i64w�a. Of the Caar 6-4 Opt"& aaftcsm for tAs *%M& 4ft favor Of the p rO A,. .4rard: Jhryt„ 5o Pabcort Xse Car*^&# Poll of Caren& v-I I wit Co wwo Ate* , **a" a1F ap-LU pop .tie& o► # p��rwr �e#, eend tJea Cl.t.� attar � tha.+' tha .r rot.064Uve a f �► w to t" C"p cows*" t "a 0"$64 * ream be rrs#arr og :.,ask to tha p4anwtAV �f G' +fin Avw Var " a{ryrr�ow`t,� open U& C P4 ,o* «�gpar�t"__: y f ..fir ... • � .a C.L4 Ate wvmW 04. of-f arbrot.e.sl.ar► o f t & Cads Aws wre•t., wk4xA wo4.d at l aw Zero-t-a WZare X4^s of "a prrjLac A 404 tA& Yo wnt-a t area. A ice► wrjd*r&t**d t"t figs Var"^" w A4 be granted ertid t Mt bw4.4d4rW paara'LA wttt be i.4+ Ww ba#ors f i nat 040A at Lam of 40CA 1044A# eods blo the C44r " t4#ht of Vm fact. heat t%s prof acA& &,LU �% i^ v aft f O MMCs wih th* W*" Of tour to-b a-adopted CLt* z0ft4^0 " of Ur4LOnc". Jt 4A *44a wndoreUod #.hat th* OrA4.sno* t64 6 Wife s.a►ad 4A a a*&U^# i,A ohs r pert aa, 4"emh4r w".4 Or. Ps&m., Nr. jotn", two "0ww4wr�# t�.,v ► a f fiJ�s �t Coea �t.aa «mot4rrL#. i .p•t 4A 04#* tAs &US cover". wat 614W =0% r f4.f p,*Vicefct P #Q*4r4j6t of ^NO � haws �ra�s and r�n,�t�sa�y► b�,�,at,�l•t,�r �r a �� � i �tar+ psr�o+ow P *iWA O-M-- Cava"#* for 1��� a+a�1► a# bed wlsti+atowe toc�► 1�" � �P 4bfW4,. gr dd 0 604"ft464p f i.ropttaa", at+c+ I Ids ob #Lv4 4A 40% t forto pier ) cot � r ok**-.l OW wwovsred from aftio 004nt �4" l t* #war 4^eh"J above swadla to #.iwr ate. G"orona WPM 7 � b"AT19 OF r.Ae !►rL_tNIA i In:uW for the County of Orange CITY OF N NTINTON MEACHY CITY CLERK Hearing 61-1T Rate of Calitornis County of OT&W Alto ! . Richter- That I am and at all time+herein mentioned woe a citizen of li the United States, over the ale of twenty-one}oars,and that I am not a puty to, nvr interested in th3 abova er'itled matter; . that I am the ptiacipal r!�ri of the printer of the MuntIngton Mach Ind. Review a utwspgmr of poorsl circulation,puh*Aod in the City as Huntington Nach County of Otvage swd which newspaper is published for the ' diesm±;etke of local tw"and intalligence of a general charac- ter, and which newapapet at all times heroin mentioned had and still has a bona floe oubreription lirt of paying subscribers, and which newepapez burs been atitsbtiahPA, printed end pub- Hatred at regular intervals irl the said CcrMty of Orange for a 41 j period exceeding one year; that '&be notice, of which the rtn:ieW is a printad oopy, hea been published Ic the regular and writhe Was cf add awnpow,artd not in any nupphavat thereat,on agar fal m tsj dates,to grit: Agri 1 23, 193.1 i c"ty(or dociun)undst penalty of perjury that the forego- ing is ttus and carted. Dot dat ... ..Garden, 8revt......... .... ... Ct ... 2 L- 1.0 i I .Ia al ... ,, - ,,.. r � Pone M e.t7A�'••1�0 _._. ... ....� �..... �� ...�++....��.....•....Yl.a w.�w.w�..r.M�,.......�a�.. .may....��.r.�...+wr�,y..� _ _ _lid..a.r lrMa.iMn.M..y..•d1�A..� .....•.++wK.�w.�.; I CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2M MAIN STREE-T CALIFORNIA a2848 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK may 60, 1981 Robert L. Comna 7308 Center Drive Huntington Beach, CA. 92647 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular w•ting held icy 49 1981 , referred the matter of your appeals to the Plenning Commission denial of CE 81-18 and CE 81-17 back to the Planning Commission. Please contact the Developm3nt Services Department for further information - 6271. 1 i Alicia M. Wentworth � City Clerk; AMMI:bt CC- Jim Pal ino Director of Development Services 1 i ram:Ir�4s�#tn►1 i •.Mr IV • )wiry, � i I (714) 894.7341 i (11.1) 04.734. •, (714) ,�Q4.7 4, r .J 7308 Cmer Dr►►1e. 0 Hs►ntiot Free►► Reads, C"Id for►d(i 92647 Haler►i►Vion Rtw(h Garekn G�oov a Wevmbiswr • Ilis►-e ," aw.wli • Rialto North Hollythhhl • Heine•► a Ri► -rside Sim &-riwrelino April 16, 1981 ar Huntington Beach City Council 16 P. O. Box 190 ,r Huntington Batch, CA 92648 ra �v Dear ! bars of the City Council: �as We axe •appealing eondittonal Exception No. 81-17 a No. 81-16. our appeal is basad upon the interpretation of Tcwnlot specific Plan Abdo One, Article 935, Paragraph S9356.4, Sub paragraph (ii) in the last sentence, which we have not been able to receive interpretation of this paragraph from the Pl&nning Department. it ier :he feeling of our attorney and ourselves that this line � aellovrt hero lot lino construction. We plan to d1scuss this with tno City Attorney, Gail Hutton an soon ahe returns from vacation. R! c 2 y RO EkT L$E C- President, Corona Devolog=ent Co. ,1 Ali i i ClTV Or HLNGTI1 ° + INTER-DEFARTMENT COMMUNICATION I To Charles W. Thcwapsoff � � from James N. Pealin, Director �I City Administrator Development Services Subject SUFPLM NTAL INFO ION LOIN its April 30, 1991 j hGXNDA I 81-17 AND O2 ( CIS. 812 Attached herewith is a letter from Corona Dovelope9 rent. Company, which has been filed pursuant to a meeting held with Mr . Corona, (fail Hutton ^nd myself on April 17 . The purpose of that meeting was to discuss an interpretation of the To"lot Specific Plan developaasnt standarda, at which time I indicated to Mr .. Corona that I jould concur with a referral back to the Planning Commission of those two conditional ex.- captions subject to the Conmission's concurrant review of an amendwnt to the Townlot $pacific Plan. This amendment would propose allowing zero-to-saro construction. However, the latter goes beyond that point and stipulates that it had been Mr. Corona 's undaerntanding that his variances would ;as granted . The Department of aaevelepeent Serrvi,cee cannot concur with that statement, for should the City Council mandate an approval by the planning ComrAssion for thew* applications should they be referred back tot that body . I have attempted to contact Mr. Corona on this subject since receiving his letter; however, he is out of town and as of the preparation of this comunication no contact with his has been made. Therefere I would only concur with a referral back to the Planning Co mission after Mr. Corona acknowledges that the decision !.a a matter vt detormiration of faut to be made by the P1auning Commission, as that body is an autonomous commission and a draisioO should no*t be mandated upon thma. I should also note th-it both the Attorney ' s office and Development Servi.com in reviewing these rm:-vents felt that the variance they aril for goer beyond parity and r d, in fact, be ,a grant of special. privi- lege. The Council, therefore'. Haight have a difficult tiow finding the necessary Mrdsh:tp for approval . t will be prepardAto discuss this further with the Council at its y i , loll meeting. adf ttach"at ` I Y � '1 fLlff 1 l Y�4 i • t.•A (i 14) 89 i 7 541 ' (71v'XY4.7S-Q (714) 894•7•S4.i AU k0l' ti' C.'rlrirr Drir r. 0 f hirrfiii f, i hi s1th, (. di/ilriihi 92647 oil -any, l�+tali I l+tlly�1 ,+++1 • I Gvtri r + R hoc xidi, S;m 13rwhlrdill,+ Apra 28, 1981. C-j t6t o f AAn4ir µton deaCh aooa mazn Straa.t: ;n Beach, CA 92648 1N ,irWn 7' BEACH P•ANNIN3 Wffri Att: Mr. )am" Pa4Lm, Ci t* PtanrLiA# -24,re&tor MA.. g&4A 4u.tt on, CUo Atto meµ pad 2'9 01 . . Re.- i�l ze t L* w•i.t1i Ro b a rt Zee Corona, Pl rGA4Ai&Awt P. 0. B" 190 Corona �he.v�cpmen•t Ccr�perryi, Qno. , *r" 211, ON ch CA SM 9: DO A+ n. Q " of#$.+r.Q. off• the rXtµ Aura rne** Pr i&6 nts Robert Xee Corhea, jamw4 P&Un, ga-Z A tfion and mgmbsr4, of the City Att4r 'a 4tatt• Sufi�ect: ProjLecAa• 6&sbmU as bio Robert Xse Corona# 1 o ca ed at l a h Street and Oran*e and 11,th Strest and (t4we., who c L hod prew�ou-64 b t4n den.Leri byk Vm Pt4mn4jL* CoarwLa&Lon. 4c."a of tha Conmg, ,4cos%',a concern for L" proper a,a,' ' p ro c eedr rep though Vm ConwAA6 .on w" -n favor of the ,tiro j.e 4rse-d: Jha't, 9, Robert • uom Corona, Prwe►Lden,t of Cc ronaaeve topmwtt Cuapan�, Jmau , w PP �r eaA the pagtMW&t and th&C 40f`# .that• •th"r r 6psctL we o f f 4xALb, wbI&U r.""Wftd to the eJ-t•V CouncA t tJL&t the p rro$&Vt4 wour[.d be referr-ed bach. to t.Jeo Pam,'., ,,• Con rrqA4440% for Va k anc•e app rovat, t upon tA4& c4AO Pt ann 34p►ar t ;. qV6,A00" beach dWv91 rpM* *ftrvWO$ department StAf f EPORT TO! PI-inning Commission I►►'1'I"r:: April 7, 19111 (Referred by Hourd of Z(Oning Adjustments ) '•t'1'11�'hIt'I't ('c,r. cii%a DevuIolvtsr.,nt Co . , int- I)kl-I:_AC('1.�:!'TED,— WIV (:i•ntep Avo, f'lrl�i•�.t.�l'yl :!5, 19141 • Itclrrtittrytor� tieac�ft, t"a . To permit a pori:ton cif the mein April 25, 1981 lxif)d i nq to 1xi tronstrileted with zorc, f' of a idu yard on bnt�: LNJi Townlot S% xr::4 t f- reii�:a . N on, Arua One Al ION Ir eatc..tt at tfla S0111:1hcast —t�F�IF'ttl��1��1�)r iMedicsc�i Density corner cr 11t1i ,;Lrc:et aixl lit-:4i (ic;nIIaI 01 ivo Avonti::. hA,It . 269 acres Vacant � i I 'rho staff is rec=monding that the 4w.n.:ii mist on deny Conditional Exception ttf,. fl 1 --1 i, m roquest t9 permit a ter* aide yard setbi,.~k on both aides r)t* a 25 ft. lot and ta• allow an incroa®e in the vwx1mum lot coveracio f r am 50 56 percent. . .;. t Ovondi t ional Exopption No. 81 -17 has been referred to the Planning Com- 1! F kOicrn by that board of Toning Adjustments . This applicat, on is a c.,quent to altov a veto aide yard setback on bot:r sides of two of the t (mir contiquous lots located its the Townlot Specific Plan Area and to Ise) allow an increase In the alto coverage from 50 - 56 percent, This Proposal uOuldt allaW Vour units m indit!idual lots with common wall* at they property live *stablishiag * four unit side-by-side ccoplsx. A s icr reviewing the proposad project, the staff has Identified the 1 h J 1 oroi r; i ssa4r r 1itr01 the applicsot aMIr nst,ratad a hardship in order to juatify pt'antift" of a itia"i exception? 40 Lk 4 4. TWO the granting of rite conditional exceeptior necessary for the preservation and er,aoyment at the applicant '~ proporty rights? Pursuant to section 15105 of the Californian Environmental (quality Act, the r9qu*szoei conditional exception is as Class V Caateegoricaal aximption. Subject property Is locatod Cara the eaouth+east corner of 11 th Street and Olive Avoinue in tho Aid Town Speeelfic Plan, District One. Subject property is presently vacant of d&velopmont and it dONi,ghatad On thtr General. Plan as liedIUM Deenal. ty Residential . The propertip8 to tho north, east, south, and went of the subj*ct site are also son#d Townlat Specific Adair, Area one, designated on the General plan as MediWM Derttslty Residential and are developed with single family and Multi-family residential, units. I The: applicant" a request is to Allow the development of a four unit complex, each on individual. 25 ft . lots having coomon wails along trio property liner of all at the units . The center two units would have K sera lot Lino on loth side of the property. The Townlot Specific Plan presently a l lnwa a sera lot line concept between two parcels, however, the opposite aide yard of each emit must have a minimum 5 ft , side yard setback. The applicant in requesting that the center two emits have the soro lot: line concept along bath Lid* property liners. This in essence would cxeratea a 4-unit attached complex. The v.?plicaant hoe also requta ted that the pereei ttod site cover.44e be i ncrai+eed f r*n 50 - 36 percent, Numerous single family homes have been developed under the Townlot Sperclfle: plan sIncee Its adoption in 1976 . This ordinance al',lcnre for detached units having a 1 ft. vide yard on either side and attached units with a sero lot lime aJ ong a common property boundary with S ft side yard along the opposite aide of each unit . The original 1,;iteent of this ordinance was to allow single family lwae os an each 25 ft. lot in the area, w%ifelr providing ,rasa ananingful separation between ,tingle units or units ot>Mprlstd of no more th4n two side.-by-side. The staff conmrs that the proposed project will create an extr~ly baulky develcps~eent . These four units attached side-by-side are proposed to be con+struc:tod thirei stories high. The staff fools that this will cffWte s 1-story high %mllo almost 100 feet long. -W icant of this request had ansvere d the four following queastlons �., -MlieMation form in this manner . 1 ayes `Chreo ton al-17 ' 1 . what eexci t 1 ona l circumstanc*a apply to petition on property ( i �ncludin P Pe sise4, shape topography., location, or surroundingsi that deprives it of privileges normally enjoyed? M13K,lMlti r Diana 7. Will the conditional exception constitute a grant of spocial privilege ihconslstant, with normftl li nitations? 3 . Why is this conditiotual *xceeption necessary for, the prit4 ervaetion and en joy ont of one or more substantial properi,:y rights? VQK, r. The plasm shower pretsents a better usage of the lineal ground ' atrem dvatilablo on the cite . It converts the unusable 3 tt v side yard into a usable court yArd and b ft. sides bard . 4 . States .reasons achy the Uraanting of Chia conditional exception will not be aeotertally, detrimental :o the public wolfaree? A&SMs In ecapliana:e with farcnt and rear setbacks, and height reequiravonts, the project it laid out visually not to eappeeatr to bet connected frm the front or rear view. There is acceesx for Fire, Police, and public utilities from both front and reear, and will not be materially detriments.' to the public w*ltaarea. The above answers do not demonstrate hardship related to the size, shape, topography, location, or surrounding# which or* required for the granting of a conditional exception. The applicant has irAi aateed that that granting of thi• cmditA ona 1 exception will n'l laV for a more usable sWee yard, when in fact the and* providers for a seem LA 1 i nee concept with S f t. opposite side yard*. Tt amtoree, this concept is already provided for by the Ordinatnco Ccdoo hay ovor, limiting the nuirber of units rides b7 side to two. :staff analysis indicates that the applic&nt has not demonstrated a hardship not to this coiWitional exception necessary for the preservation and en- Joyment of the afflie;ant' s property, thgrefore3, thee staff is reeconwnding that the Comiselan deer Cooditional. Exception No. 81,•17. 129 6-- - VI clamed on the above analysis and the following findings, the staff r&camend that the Planning Commission deny Conditional, tteesption to. at--lie F'f MNlIO M UPS J a 1 . Mine* the 7raiQt Specific Plan allows for individo al doteecherd units or -* zero lot lliae deverlopoent on 25 f t . lots in the Tewnlot ;seas, i hebree is no OxeOptiO461 circumstance unique to the patltioffl ed sir +qF Ay twit dk*tivea It of privi l*9ear normwe l l f enjoyed, 1 r OM :{Y 11,19v Four �' . Since the Townlot Specific: Plan allows for Zero ;ok lime devolopmont:, vi► to a minimum of 5 f t. separation be►tweer, every other unit , the granting of this corAltion4X exetp►tion would cvnet:tuts a graant of epaiA&I privilage Inconsistent wit;i-i normal limitrtiona. I . The Townlot specific Pia allows for the dovelopment of these Individual 25' ft. lots, thereforoL, this conditional o:xcreption is not nece,smary for the preeor. vat.i.,xi Ynd enjayment, of one or more, substantial property nights. Nice 7. nit-* Plan Peceiv*d and dated April 3, 1901 y rr AP-D ri 46 Off COMM ol .01 •". ,, • " r," /� , w / !•J .• •,' ,/ •fir',r .' •, I I •, �„� � , " •� 'fir �/ ,` � '. • • , ,fr. rr . . ' • ,r , / —II RIM 40� . I '- Y, , 1 M , r it r• , ,f 'r } �•• , L REQUES AZOR CITY COUNCIL 'S,CTION Date „A8�`r i 1 24 , _.1981 Submitted to. Honorable Mayor and City Council ';Pijbmitted by: Charles W. 'rhompson, City lidministrator Prepared by: Department of Deve.lopmerit Services SubjW: APPEAL OF CONDITICNAL E'XCEPTION NO ., 81-17 Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Soiree, Altrnnntive Actio(is, Attachrnents: MTZtjENT OFSSU :: 'r.ransrnitted for your consideration is ar,, appoL-11. to Conditional Exception No. 81-17, a request to permit a ' 0 ' side yard set- back or) bath sides of 25 f. t: . lots in the Townlot: area and to allow an increase in the maximum lot coverage from 50 56 percent . The Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommends that the City 'Counci.l uphold the Planning Commission ' s denial of Con- ditional Exception No . 81-17 . ANA I _: Appellant : Robert s. . Corona 7308 Cen•.-.r3r Drive Huntingtox'k bear,h, Calif . 92647 Applicant : Carona Development Company, Inc . 7308 Center Drive Huntington Beach, Calif , 92647 Location: Southeast corner of 1,1t:h Street and Olive Avenue. Request : To permit a portion of the main building to be constructed with ' 0 ' sideyard setbacks on both sides and to allow an increase in the permitted lot coverage from 50 to 56 percent, , „LAidN �'iC„COMMZSSION.. ACTION ON APRIL 7, 1981 : ON MOTION BY BAUER AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION No. 81- 17 WAS DENIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: ALES: Bannister, Wirchell, Porter, Schumacher, Bauer NOES: Keneficrk ASSENTS None ' ABSTAINs None Pig 4141 Page Two I . Since the Townlot Specific Plan allows for individual dctF-.ched units on separate., parcels or units developed with zero lot line concept on two contiguous 25-foot parcels, there are nc, exceptional circumstances unique to the petitioned pvoperty that depriver, it of the pr. iviiegos normally enjoyed . 2. Since the Townlot Specific P'lan a.'Llows for zero lot line dev-- elopment with a minimum of fiv , (5) nor' separation separation between every unit, the granting of this conditional exception would constitute to grant of special privilege inconsistent with normal. limitations . 3 . The Townlot Specific Plan allows for the deve.IOPITIellt Of these individual 25-fout lots ; therefore, this conditional exception is not accessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial prope-A.-ty rights. .QjSCU5SION: The applicant is requesting to allow the development of a four unit project, each unit on an in,3ividual 25-foot lot, having comi-ilon walls along the property line between each of the units . The center two units will have a zeL-0 lot line set'back on both sides of the pvoperty. This in essence would create a fouru-nit attached project . The ap- plicant 'has also requested that the permitted site coverage be in- creased from 50 to 56 percent. The Townlot Specific Plan presently allows =i zero lat line concept between two parcels , however, the opposite Vide yard of each unit must ha,re a minimum side yard setback of not less than 5 feet . This would allow no more than two attached units in any one complex . Numerous single family homes have been developed under the Townlot Specific Plan since its adoption in 1976 . This ordinance allows for deta�:ho.d units having 3 foot side yards an either side and attached units with zero lot line along a common property boundary with the 5 foot side yard setback on the opposite side of each unit . The original intent of this ordinance was to allow single family homes an 25 foot lots in this area, while providing some reasonable separation between single units, or units comprised of not more than two s.-ide by side. At the April 70 1981 Planning Corunission meeting,. the Commission questioned the conditional exception procedure for trying to accomplish this concept. The Commissicti also noted that during a meeting between the applicant, Planning Staff, and an ad hog; commit-tee of the Planning Commission, several months prior to the meeting, the applicant indi- cated that he would be willing to prepare a study and possible code amendment in order to allow this zero lot line concept as he is presenting it. The applicant has not submitted a study or code amendment regardinq this matter . Therefore, the Commission requested that the staff research the specific Plan District and reevaluate the standards therein for the purpose of a DOSsible code amendment, taking into consideration the implementation of the presented con- cept . The staff indicated it would be six to eight weeks before a study and proposed code amendment could come back to the Planning commission. J:i Tl1l 10 Page Three pursuant to Section 1-5105 of Lhe California Envirc),imental 011,31ity Act , trig requested conditional exception ii3 a Class lr categorical exemption . U! ti I G SQU^,—Rr'jq Not applicable. tLTERNAT,j,V� T 4N The City Council may consider over. .urning thn Planning Commission ' s denial of Conditional Exceptiorn No . 81.--17 and allow the development of the four side by side atta/_hed units as proposed by the applicant. 1 . Area Map 2 . Staff Repjrt dated April 7, 1981 3 . Letter of Appeal Respectfully submitted: At7essW. Galin, nirectoirtrnr�nt of Devf-.lopment. SeSrvin.a.3 CWT:L7WP:SMS :gc F , `a� �� ,� �'l- •a _ a ., , ' �,�� \\ :� \\ \�- :� •\- •� � Ili :t del 7/ (iy GEL SCA `.EAe IN FEET, - 17 MONTMOWON KACH PLANNING DlVfSION i (714) diM-7541 • (714) 994. 41 71 41 ,ryi. 7.M Cerat,�r 1�►r, t. N+ ntrN ►t� $�rA, (,.rb �,rr�� 91647 � 1 I V tiWMR" BeWh C#V4FW t FOW a it 40MO 4V a i'isr+ + B+"MM �Vrn� f�,�rv�t + �►�+► + k�vn +� 8lr+��w veil Ise 1"I wottAft" 9"cb City czm"U P. 01 fox 1*0 11I ntixrpmw M"C&a CA 93i44 Dmax **bus of tha city Cow mil I ft Prt • i s OwAit mkl 39o4ption IN. 81 -17 ` p©. 91.14. Ow appeal is Swomd vf4m tM $Artarprotat ion of f+niot opwiiic 101m - ks" Ouwr At^tAela M# Yitr"L*aph J93$4.4, sub Para4prW 111) is the last aratanm+ rkiaft wM bays wt bom *Mo to receive is srtatrl�ow of WS prurap oh ixvu Use 9iaadjw t. xt is tba lVaelk" Cw ow atta va" aaa OQC"sVOG tit this Lim m atk2ft swan► U* itasi I=. tip PIMA t* "MOOM this With City Att*rt*y, tail 9uttaa as sew► rst+sxas trsA v+taati�via» l law ff pr"14"t, Con" uwwlapmmt Co. .w• • 111 ,intington beach developmel services department ff REPORT�� TO: Planning Commission FROM : I 1 ov,I!Iont. -rv.i CON PIT1ONA1, I;XC1:!!_lai)tI_•)l()..._ti ) I (1101. 01' I'r'Ll h! ' lie-1,_11-d of ;,aininrI r AP11LICANT Cot on.--t Co , Ct)c: . 1)r\'•1'1-: ACC;E I)T ::i) - 7 1O i Ct 1:LU1 25 , 19H 1 11trt11. i ttcrt �il I{r. :: r•!t, c'�) _ f)�ltdlrr','1'Oli�'- !'l�(ri'►'S iINt;_ DATE : !kE 1)E ST: To 1)r'r—wit. rr I)c)rl inn t ho w! lit - 1�tt.i l cJ i 11( 1 1:.$) l,t- c•nt1:;t-CS1(7t Ocl t•ri t:h Zc: I'�ti , c,r)1. :; idc .�rrrcI �)n ►,nt. Ii Ic�tdt: - I'c�wnlcar. F;nr_��ifi.r, Plat) , ArL?i1 0110 1w�1�'�1TI0N : E,oc itc.!tl ,it t.irc; :;c.,lrl hr�;� ;l Cil;i11_:i,t�[,_ (�1,t�id : t`1ecl� ttm I)cynsity corner cal 1 ] t 1r ; ;t.r<:��t �tt�:l - -- - - 12t�:, icic'nt ial Olive hvc•ntw .. V;;c_,ttrt: 1 ,,O_S-UGc ST V ACTION: The staff .is reCommeTidinrl that the Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 81-17 , a request to p�-rmi t a zero side yard setback on both sides of a 25 ft . lot and to allow an increa,so iYI the maximum lot coverage C from 50 .•- 56 percent . 2. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION: Conditional Exceptit:n No. 81--l7 has been referred to the Planning Com- mission by the Board ot• Zoning Adjusunent,s . This application is a. regttorsst to allow a zero side yard setback can both sides of two of the four contiguous lots luca.ted in the Townlot Specific: Plar. Area and to also allow an increase in the site coverage from 50 - 56 percent. This proposal would allow four units can individual lots with common walls at the property line establishing a four ;snit side-by-ride complex. 4 4 21W OF ISSUES t After reviewing the proposed project, the staff has identified the following issues: 1 . Has tt,e applicant demonstrated a hardship in order 'to Jtr:;tify the granting of a ^onditional exception? AlLk �-�rwsa 4`� i 11 , �,. •ice � ...,.ri� hT ,e,4 '.yw`�h '• Ilk Page Two CE 8i--0 2 . Is the grarntinq of the candiVional exception necessary for the preservation and 0n.joyment of the ept�li.cant 1 s property ri.7ht:� 4 . 0 t NV I RQVftE; T ,, !ILA TU_,S Pursuant to ,)e-ction 11,105 c,f the California Environmental Quality ?act, the requested conditional exception :is a Class V Categorical Exemption . i 520 Sc.'RROUNDING LAN USE, ?G[v_lc4c, AND GFCVk�RAL _��I /'1N L�E�1Gt��r7'Ic�r�; Subject property is located on the southeast corner of 11t:h .Street and Olive Avenue in the Old Town Specific Plan, District: One . ;Subject property is presently vacant of developmont and is designated on the General plan as Medium Den i.tv Ftesidenti.al . I The properties to the north, east, south, and west of the subject site are also zoned Townlot Specific! Plan, ,Area one, designated on the ' General plan as Medium Density Residential and are developed with single family and multi--family residential units . 6,0 ANALYSIS:_ The applicant ' s request is to allow the development of a four unit i PP q complex, each on individual 25 ft. lots having common walls along the property line of all of the units. The center, two units would have a zero lot line on bath sides of the property. The Townlot Specific k Plan presently allows a zero lot litre concept between two parcels, however, the opposite side yard of each unit must have a minimum 5 ft. side yard setback. The applicant is requesting that the center two units have the zero lot line concept along both side property lines. This in essence would create a 1--unit attached complex. The applicant has also requested that the permitted site coverage be increased from 50 - 56 percent. Numerous single fami_ r homes have been developed under the Townlot Specific Plan since .s adoption in 19176 . This orft ance allows for detached units havin a 3 ft . side yard on either side and attached units with a zero l.c; line along a common property boundary with i ft . side yard along the pposite side of each unit . The original intent of this ordinance a to allow singe family hordes on each 25 f lot in the area, w' le providing some meani.ngllul sepekrati.on bets. een single units or ur ;s comprised of no more than two side--hy-side. 'i';.e staf,� concurs that the proposed project will create an extremely bulky develo;-inent. These four units attached side-by-side are proposed to be constructed thiree stories high. The staff feels that this will create a 3-story 'high wall., almost^100 feet long. The applicant of this request has answered the four following questions on the application forth ir. this manner. 7 r Page Three f!! CE 91-17 1, . What exceptional circumstances apply to petition pr'oparty (:including i size, shape, topocraphy, location, or surroundings) that deprive it of privileges normally enjoyed? Answer;: None 1. Will the conditional exception constitute a griant of special privilege loc.onsis tent with normal i_imi U,. E-A.on.9? f &.rawer• No i 3 . Why is this cor►r::i Lineal c�xcept:i,c�i� necessary forthe presf,rvati on and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights 'I II An eV The plan shown presents a better usage of the lineal ground area available on the site. It convert, the unusable 3 ft . side yard into a usable court~ yard and 6 ft , side yard . 4 . State reasons why the graritirg of this conditional exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare? I saver : In compliance with front and rear setbacks, and height requi.re.ments, the project is laid out visually . not to appear to be connected from the front or rear view. There is access for Fire, Police, :nd public utilities from both front and rear, and will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare . The above answers do not demonstrate hardship, related to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings which are required for the granting of a conditional exception. The applicant has indicated that the granting of this conditional exception will allow for a more usable side yp,r.-d, when in fact the code provides for a zero lot lire concept with 5 ft . opposite side yards . Thernfore, t?,is concept is already p.rovi.ded for by the Ordinance Cade, however, limitinrl the number of units side by side to two. Staff analysis indicates that the applicant has not demonstrated a hardship nor is this conditional exception necessary for the preservation and c.n- ,joytnent of the applicant ' s property, therefore, the stuff is recommending that. the Commission deny Conditional Exception No. 61-17 . Based on the above analysis and the following findings, the staff recommend that the planning Conunission deny Conditional Exception No. 9z�.x7. FIND= ...EQ9 . N AL' 1. Since the Townlot Specific plan allows for- individual detached units or a zero lot line development on 25 ft. lots in the Townlot Area, there is no exceptional circumstance unique to the petitioned property that deprives it of privileges normally enjoyed. • .,•4M 4.' .,_ y_.w'+�W.MaFr+�#!r mow.. ., .+.. _"^v .rz '+ Mwi.W+��•�� ._ �Y�...^' . . � ..., 1+ ' P49a Fc ur CE 81- 17 2. Since the T'ownlot Specific Plan allows for zero lot line development, with a m{llimum of 5 ft. separation between eve:y other unit , the granting of this �ondi.fiinn��1 exception wnu' d constitute a gran: of special. privilege inconsistent_ with normal. limita-ions . 3 . The Townlot Specific Plan allows for the develot-iment of these individual 25 ft . .loLs, therefore, this conditional exception 1s not necessary flor Lhe preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property H.cPubs. B!gc &TTA � NTS 1 . Area Map 2 . Site Flan received and dated April 3 , 1981 r i ♦ : • h• yam'1 4 r" N9 w't ton M.W r:fo._ �. ..��..�, — -i..lYrrIF w—. .. .r �C• f 1 ►ed •N� ; Pub 1 i shwApri l 73 1981•, NOTICE OF PUKIC HEARING APPEAL TO THE DENIAL OF C E 081-17 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Courtci 1 ChdWer of the Civic Center, Huntington Desch, a� the hour of _ �_ P.M, 6 or as soon thereafter as � passiblw an NOnd&✓ the 4th dsy o�, may 'for the purpose of considering an appeal to ':he Planning Cm mis3ion's Benia1 of Condi tioral Exception No. 81-1 i`. a request to ;:ermi t a aortion of the main j bui'.di ng to be constructed with zero Foot side yard on both sides. The subject property is located at the southeast corr,,ir of ltth Street and Olive Avenue. i A legal description is on file in, the Department cf Davelopmt. Services Office. i i i `i All interested persons are invited 'to attend said hearing and express their opinitns for or against said appeal Further inferMOOM Hwy be obtained firm the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main street. "Mungtoar peach. Caiitorniad 92848 - (714) 5M-5;:?7 r DATED .. amd1 .2„aggL,,,,.`„. CITY OF HUNT!NGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth ;a City Clark T 4 was* ' f *, At' . . . .... r +.��..-•,.rr.,... ..,�Li.fp.�p��Ilrfii.�rY�Yii�iss Y N.r in me SruP#fW CAWO COMO to a"to the G a(Omft. , Henri" 01 .11 &L , o f 4i J. 1 r,h't e r .�. . ?lwot l oar Ow at all tiawa.Iwww ki Mo+wwwt 0%w wNa a c-0645n of �•�•Arm. tlwr .lnitad$tmok Uwe? W am of two0tyOw yfaft.sued that l +111�tEt1Mi %in nc t a Party k, am ist*ww W in is rwbow wd,l u o%atsar; 0.0 I to fbw paww4w Ark of tba prLun of tlma 1 1 irisi Id w. 4 tJYw -, { 40 Mid tom.f+rw .r iar r• �► 1h�� �- tIu►'t il, 11an Cowreer of OUNW awed a►lw" ft wowwpopae io published for the alweewlm www of 6xw ism*xA inkoftwoar at it p e*l ebo w:- wr bmw N tw, and •fib miftporw at aR do w Wevin wwwlrfwl+:i*d had wa� p w�tP/ MN qpfts ** dad a4711row abor,q Aida wrtarriptiaa lief at peyriwwf autswcrilwars, awe f v iw�Al� 111� d +ri kh movisp-mm hao be" wtebUdodr pwiat,ed mW pub r` ? wore't~ linow at rwlpwwlnt kitemde 10 Ow amid County d f rrMA-Igm for s MY 7..+�: s W IM � porkmd esmsda g a n s yuut; deaf tie native, of whkh the v;7AD mr eead is a plow campy, hau irm psiliaiwad lu thrp rsXdar i;IIT rc amd entire bwo of raid wweWWRPW.ewwd w� in any Ompplo=ent hr: $WOW,un Ow Iallaerim dews.to wi►: �. I ew Wy tar dscimn) ww4dw p mky of pMwrtwy :►+at the f wwo- f i�le taus old oo:rroR � pardon ►trove ... ............1 .. .... . .... .. .,•... .. ....... . . ...... ..... lrh+tr . .. ......... .... ........ .. .. .. . .. Biplwrtwa r •' r y,T i 7 +, NGTICIS Tic CLg2K TO SCHEDUL! PUSi,IC s IT JfMjMMMM ra To CM CLRU I! Off!ICZ DAT4: •• •. .. Pig 3CMMJW d MLIC MUM USING TUN ATTACHED LNGAL NOTICZ MR THE Y Or �• P P r 0's are attacbed AP'a Mt11 follow r NO ,k?ta Initiated by: Pla=Lug Couaieaion Planning Department Petition Appeal Other Adoptiow of grnvirormantal Status (X) _ YES NO 1 1 Refer to w�.�na•r.r..r_�r 1 Planning Depertmnt r Ixtenstan for oddit iona l iu(orewt Lft r ME pleat tr*wit wmcl,* wordluS to be required in the legal. Hn.`v ONO ._ .. . ..,a._.'. ...., ,. w ..._..._ ._... �'C:".'�r.rr-' :�.:�.,..:...,r-::•�.. ,••�--+M .'�'?:u .r•--ems ' C March 25 , 1981 (act) p 6 DOD 24--155-15 7 ].1, Mirka et al mAtiayixm Omft, call U6 13th strmt 92a47 926418 8 n Bch, CLUf ' 24-IlS-Ol W115~-16 24-Ul--03 Art�>w N fts bliAtthm J PAWLch Stoom arew*mq 8300 Haa t ftrdcv,Blvd "4 uth 8Uvwt 320 llth 8t. Lm Arg"". Cal i ftachl caw Huntington Ito Ca. 42648 sxW9 92648 24-lir-p2 14-115-1/7� ��. }24-111�-04A" Pholty OD. Riefutd m,,u Jams aymid S. 1�7V�i�it IIL— ,*ile��yitit 1 •-1 20581 ppL,,e�i,�n�L Cali� 318`Uth Stty,� ns 2 . Ikatir-jtm iWtm chi 648 Los AnpLU i, Cm ld.f 90069 926" 24»155 08 24"11.5-18 24-Ul-08 Scat PAWT Ot a1 Stall& feria V'"drturgh Sri TUXCO 370 S EXI.fad Avmm 210 nth street. 405 N. 6th St. UVIA'1de omit f 61u�nt q n Bowh, Calif Mntdxdlo, CA. 90640 9178b 9264e i r�- 1�.r09 24-1.15-19 24-111-11 mutin 91Min Jams T kit P4 m m CaLhol c A""v of ar 1771 W Awe► dt #Cr IF 81.8 14t1i strut lit mar y I a by the sm Area, CAI if k0art.imt Gn Bewh, Calif 321 lOtli St. 92601 92648 Hnntitvton Boach, C.a. 92648 24-LIS-11 24--115-20 24-111-12 001di C �. m l W14 8 Code Reran Cat iol is Bishop of an S q! U"dw as3U Bala AVOMA 440 So DIUV xr St. 173 fty OMO bNOW Kidray City, Calif C MMIF Ca. 926" Lora McWhe Call,f 90903 93655 *OU11*13 34--Wl►u 24-Ul-13 aw 1w Gnm at aL 3l7 10 8721 t Cal* I* t ;rU +-14 wow N32 • ut h .t 24m jai I Gait NIL fit, Cklif I gills, Ok. 92653 '9Z64i r.' V ' I 1� . Nwe-Ji 25, 1981 (JA) t 4�+ - 34-116_01 74--027-05 %tam� R• 17 m D. St. � Pine� . 0. UK 242 tit= dswi4 Ca* 92646 HUnti%bM Beach, Ca. 92647 rt+4`�31,��16 2+-U6r-02 4-027�06 ' s .r�Ul C. QXWNM C�►. 92+646 3 12th t. I*mtinow Amcbs Ca. 92648 24-11"3�4 24-02 i-Ot� B�e`.�rrt J. Hc�t ,tvJrm tt. 8•xWt w 2a loth 8`t. C tge X. gichalIe A45 1-01.164 FA, Ham, Ca. 92648 P. G- WX 243 ,AWth ca. ~' ►0.90 d=tU)gtM doWh, Ca. 92648 j44-►.LU--24 2+-IU-04 14-027-13 +►rim � t�idazd V. Stll kait�et t Z:. Qcrtu �r, Jr. 413 M. wwoomy Rd. 5.U2 Ave. 339 UKbroitr St. fUt&jm ,r 91 lftvbdrwt.dro, CA. 92683 Laguna bawki, Gi. 92651 44-112-04 24-L.6--05 24•-027-14 L:st'lxw 4rh.),1mbian N M Vita, Inc. et Al vein H. KLXIUFCs -d 11 . Gum= ft. UO2 N. Ekmlid JLve. 527 7th St. IlaoWmat CAU9=4it 9U06 OntiuC'i, l CA. 91762 Hunt. gton Bewh, Ca. 92648 I A-112--os 24-116-06 24-027-15 J.w* SaW,i Fcbart J. Rust= TOW '.turner ,ds1.7 MeILIG LAW 210 10th St. 3US 1.2th St. ant& Aga, C'ltm4lo 927U Uartiniton bowh, Cal. 92648 kfuntirvton 60achs Ca. 92640 24-U6--07 34-027•-16 4i 1ol1mm at al Pit J. fUstatn Aene bor;jsr et al JkM 10th St. U0 loth 8t:. 306 12th St. t,'-.m-rbm homaht OR. 92648 tt3ar act bomah, Co. 92648 1mtlmUz Daach, as. 9264ts AM= 24--027-•17 6*ArM G, MCI f-Uwuc M/. shape wamml l Dr. �! Aft. 208 10th St. ;� ib►. �1] 14ur�k. acact Dar-',. Ca. 9?648 Nam; Atrk, Ca. 90057 24-116-a9 24-027-20 106 JmkiUm ftbm D. V4= A. Ar jurn L147 2&d a53 t.. //��.�� ((yypp..yy���� 25i142 ��yy�i��-�Vherl CQiyr�. IF Ca. /Yke ' Ol IrX&td� 9 l ._.... ... . moo j � T 1 ?4-027-Z 24-034-14 k,,' Is Nob. OR. 92651 &R City, ca. 92381 i� 34-034-1 3 t � t D. ;m *.Am 44tft Am. 217 Uth St. k..n1 Romaht Coi. n Beach, Ca. 92648 h a. how ►4 O*jAt Cimn limUMton loodho Cis« !X49 A-U34• 03 if,gr, H. MmcdwLtl, 3nl ..114 12t h tit:. umitinot m bmd&.. Co. 02648 1-U 34--04 :c_.1mW CroodMn o9-14 Chu=& CiLcrloo lmtiv Beach.. Ca. 9260 A-034NOb ;.wlyn M, awbran lath St. auAiMt m beach* Ca. 92648 .J4•'•V 34-U7 'I tit wictU= '44 Uth at. 1 wNi1t:Llyt M MWk*r Ch. 9264W ,r 390, LOW ; q ut h $-t. - F., am � QMM An Ik ' ice � i r . r r REOUES f FOR CITY COUNCIL "ACTION DaW April. 24, 1981 Wbniittld t4: Honorable Mayor and City Council i $Wb Bitted by: Charles W. 'rhompsun, City Administrato�(, V Nsper+ed by: Department of Dev.1opment Services �"" � f t: APPEAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO.C817_17..� . P ftlownt of Ion, R wom"Vondwtion, Analysis, Funding Source; Aftemetive Actions, Attechtwtus I'. STATENNIa Qr ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal to Conditional Exception No. 81--17, a request to permit a 10 ' side yard set- back on both sides of 25 ft. lots in the Townlot area arJ to allow an increase in the maximum lot coverage from 50 - 56 percent. i The Planning Commission and Planning Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commissionfs denial of Con- ditional Exception No. 51-17 . ' MN YSIS: Appellant : Robert L. Corona 730E center Drive Huntington Beach, Calif . 92647 Applicant : Corona Development Company, Inc . 7308 Center Drive Huntington Reach, Cala4 . 92647 Location: Southeast corner of llth Street and Olive Avenue. Request: To permit a portion of the. main building to be constructed with 10 ' sideyard setbacks on both sifts and to allow an increase in the permitted lot~ Beverage from 50 to 56 percent. ru1►7w CGMIAS M ,ACTION ON APRIL..... .. 9E j OR 140TION BY BhUER AND SECOND BY SCHUMACHER CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION no, 91-17 WAS DENIED BY THE FOLLOWING 'DOTE WIT11 THE FOLLOWING AXES: Bannister, Winche.11, Porter, Schumacher, Bauer MOBS: Xenefick 1AssIm t None ANTAIN s None N, N0 40" 1-0 r Ir r i Page Two Y, . . INDZ=t w' l,* Since the Townlot Specific Plan allows for individual detached units on separate parcels or units developed with zero lot line concept on two contiguous 25-foot parcels, there are no �Y. excaptional circumstances unique to the petitioned property that deprives it of the privileges normally enjoyed. a 2. Since the T•ovnlot Specific Plan allows for zero lot line dev- elopment with a minimum of five (5) foot separation between every unit, the granting of this conditional exception would constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with normal limitations. 3. The Townlot Specific Plan allows for the development of these individt+,l 25-.foot lots; therefore, this conditional exception in not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property ri.ght6. DxgoJON t The applicant is request-!.ng to allow the development of a four unit project, each unit on an individual 25-foot lc-)t, having common walls slang the property line between each of the units. The center two units will have a zero lot line setback on both sides of the property. This in essence would create a four. unit attached project. The ap- plicant hac also requested that the permitted site coverage be in- creased from 50 to 56 percent . The Tc'•^tot Specific Plan presently allows a zero lot line concept between two parcels, however, the opposite side yard of each unit must have a minimum Ride yard setback of not less than 5 ,feet. This would allow no move than two attached units in any one complex. Numerous single family homes have been developed under the Townlot: Specific Plan since its adoption an 1975 . This ordinance allows for detached unitm having 3 foot side yards on either side and attached uni �s with zero lot line along a common property boundary with the 5 foot side yard setback on the apposite side of each unit. The original intent of this ordinance was to allow single family homes on 25 foot lots in this area, while providing some reasonable separation between single units, or units coWrised -�f not more than two si.'�e by side. � At the April 7, 19b1 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission j questioned the conditional, exception procedure for trying to accomplish this concept. The Commission also noted that during a meeting between the applicant, Planning Staff, and an ad boc committee of the Planning Commission, several months prior to the meeting, the applicant Indi- cated that he would Ut willing to prepare a study and possible code ww dmnt i» order to allow this zero lot line concept as he is ptesentinq it. The applicant has not submitted a study or code 4"ondmant roVarding this utter. Therefore, the Commission requested I that th6 staff resee<rch the Specific Man District and reevaluate the stAjAards therein for the purpose of a passible coder amendment,, taking into emai.deration the implementation of the presented con- eept. The stain indicated it would be six to eight creeks before a studr and proposed code amendment could come back to the Planning 1 Cossaissa�on. r c • T 10 ftge Throe Mwouant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental QuaL'.ty Acts the requested conditional exception is a Clean V categorical •` a� ,tion � rNat. applicable. L'. The City Council may consider overturning the Planning Commission 's ' denial of Conditional ExceptJ.on No. 81-17 and allow the development ' of the four aide by side attached units are proposed by the applicant. J 1„ Area Map 2* Staff Report dated April 7, 1981 ' 3. Letter of Appeal, Respectfully submitted: es W. a13n, director Department of Development Services CKT:J V :bMg:gc a. q„ L Publish September 24,E 1981 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN APPEAJ T�, TN�iAL OF CE #81-17 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVER that a public heariiig wil I be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington beach, in the Council Chamber; of the Civic Center, huntingtkon Beach, at the Hour of 7:30 P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on !Monday the 5th day of October , 19 81 . for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Commission's denial of Conditiona'i Exception No. 81-17, a request to permit a portion of the main building to be constructed with zero foot side yard on both sides. The subject c property Is located at the southeast corner of llth Street and Olive Avenue, I A legAl, description is on file in the Department of Development Services Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said-hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further ifnfor"tion aray be obta inert! from the Office, of the City Clerk, 2OW Ma 9 ii Street. Huntington Beach, California. 92648 (714) 536-5227 DATED Septebber l4, 1981 CITY OF HUNT I NGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk r 1b^ 1, A% eo *X)ft MP CIS t 'r Uri.-17 March 25, 1981 (34) r. = t Ixxr 24-155-15 pp,t . OsWa Avagm William 6 Parks et al � l h, Calif 216 11th Surest r � Huntix'x'= beach, Calif 92648 24-US-01 24-11.5-16 24-1.1.1-03 Matt)iew -7 Rasi ch s'tg:�' FY1 Gr� txr`"Hwam Blvd 214 Uth Street ' ' 320 11th St. . higeles, Cali Huntington tea, Calif flunti Ntan Beach, Ca. 92648 r9 92648 ;w�_Ilz_02 14--111-04 gjPO Polity co. Richud D Jores Tr paywxxi S. 9kamit 'Aalea inq Crtjatdzaticn 205S1 IIU= IAw. 318 11th St. 0300 SmIta t+tMAM Blvd. kbAnt:inytnr: BeacJi, Cs Uic Hun-taa lton Leach, Ca. 92648 ,�,jrt e , CaiLiJ:, 90069 92646 ,.'., w ;' 24-1SxU8 24-.115r-18 z�-111-0£3 Jon Baker at al Stella Paric. Vanci mrgh John 1'ut.°ca 378 S >wlid Averwe 210 l,l th S tref,,L 405 14. 6th St. Calif Huntington Beach, calif ft)nLeLv1lo, Ca. 90640 4 017A 92648 _ 7.4--W-09 24-1.1.1-11. i mmmin tatin Ja+iw T MxL4on damn Catholic DYishop of Oran 1771'W Amwwa Dr'Suite F 81.8 14t1x Strut St Mazy's by the Sea At ahej, Calif huntizINU)n be�=1, Calj.f 321 10U, St. ,�.9, QU3, 92648 fIunLL-xjt i Bach, Ca. 926olS 24-US-20 24-111-12 C JUXIr ►rs Merle E Cade Rxnmi CaUiol c Bishop of Oran �,Awrm Unarm 8331 Win Avenue 440 S. Batavia St. t �2 ftf Sly Avwvje Midway City, Calif t3raix,7e, Ca. 91668 ! rV Owdit Calif 90803 92655 24-1.15�-�22 24-111-13 MCary }Cary iValme .7onjtn9m et al. 11th Stet 217 1.0th Stmet 8721 Rnights Ciro 1� #ten bawhf C" Hmtingtun boadi, Oilif HuntfiiUt= Boach, 'a. 92646 92648 �; 14 24-111.-01 24-.LU-14 3�► 14sjid K b Millis R. bunt l Ccive " 327 11th Strut 247911 W.1l o OhU Ad. ftophe C31J HMt;,3r.jtM beacru, Calif Laguam N.r!Usr Ca. 92653 . 92648 �. . &tat K+ �j Fi 1 ��f'"��y b�u•,' � � id Y rll�l+r 1 M, k �f a n I 24-034-14 k t*rt k w Bliss 27053. Pxwlay St. 0%. W51 stm City, ca. 92381 `717P 24-034-15 40 low PaXrt D. BdUaan amm Aft, 217 11th St, mucht Ca. Etunti.Nton d-i, Ca. 9264 8 , *-034*02 t C'=1 DoWhe Ca. 92649 � .f 3"34-03 y a �. , 3rd .pith02 St. : umbm ij Ca. 92648 W 034-04 JW4M Groxkaan ' 10 *AWMh CUUI8 R Dw"U Ca. 92648 M. Cochran h. Ca. 92648 4�7 MCA gat. lei, Coat. 92640 low ry . r Al r' S ��11 � • R •L ` + r. ICA Mmrch 25, 1981 {JN 24-116--01 24-027--05 'xl=w s D. MU tin in ! 0. ft 343 1742 Pima St. ` �" DopCh, CA* 92648 Huntirv#m 8aach, Ca. 92647 . ,, •�,�.a, �,. . , 24-1.1.+6-02 " C* 0004= 24- :1'27-06 CI=14 Luc i j arawn "L—OOPM boach, Ca. 92646 312 12 th St. Huntington 13wclf Ca. ' 92648 ' t 24-116-03 , i ; h111-2? Brian J. Hoytz9�027�08 at, zmulw ;t28 10th St. Gee R. Michelle -345-RilUide *10 " H%m ,4ngtm Beach, Ca. 92648 P. 0. Box 243 �Olaf Ca. 91030 ttuntix y n Hkah, Ca. 92648 '24-111--24 24-U6 04 24-027•-13 ,J Wwn Hbmai= Ric,w-d G. Stol] -bLvxt L.. ODnmr, Jr. 413 R. WvcxWA y Rd. 5212 Dartlroutii Ave. 339 Ledroit St. 1#lt ia, C,al i forn A 91001 Wits LIStjsz', C-.. 92603 "-quna Bewh, Ca. 92651 'U-M-04 24-116-•05 24-•027-14 Rather itallsl%i,an Nick De Vite 1w. et al. Vernon H. Hud eons 272 H. Mena= St. 1102 N. Fuc-aid Ave. 527 7th St. Via, Calib=nia 91106 Ontario, Ca. 91762 HuntiogbDn 13eacb, Ca. 92648 24- -05 24-116-06 24-027-15 Jack santLixp f *xt J. Fustz U 7td4 '5tuiier 2217 Male u1ne 210 lath St. 3U( i 2th St. t &A, California 92701 liuntinyton lieadi, Cal. 92648 IWAtimjWn Beach, Ca. 92648 24-112-06 24-•116-►07 24 -027-16 C440 Hahn n et al z -t J. Rwtan Rene der et al 309 lath St. 210 10th St. x306 12th St. bancho ^.a. 92648 Huntington beacli, Ca. 92648 Hwitington Swch, Ca. 92648 1-15 .24--116-08 XVW A-027-17 Wkcm G+ �► Charles W. St�-e wuuel up z �4141 Carbeight Ave,. 209 10th St. 1SG6 Wngbi].l Dr. mkwk:hyw�x Cal 9102 tlw�UnVt Qn lNu ch, Ca. 92648 i�cx�te�y )Park, Ca. 90t157 i 3 -16 24-116-09 24-027r-20 MAP H. uplimm au im t ,U. viqw V' A. Ar jw, $t� - 1147 22rd St.. 25442 ftjo,n ;4ve,I Cir. CA, 92648 Mad-atten Deach, Ca. 90266 Laguna Hi11s, Ca. 92653 r Y a n •` 1i ` I dJr• � Y Op P*JhrrVyWTVW A �1�I11Mr�► mm" 6TR#87 CALIFORNIA MW WINIM octmer 7. 19111 • ! L. COMM M ING cater Drive Natingtoob Mach, CA 97641 The City Camtil of the City of Huntington Beach at Its regulati rt1>~p hold Fkw4 1* October 5 110 1 denied your app"1 s to the fllami lWon's denial of Conditional Exceptions 81-11 This is a fined decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to omision of Soctiai 1094.6 of the Coda of Civil Prace tart of tM State of Cal i forr f a yea have ninety days from October S. 1981 to apply to than courts for judicial review, Pleas# mUct this office if you have any questions regarding this aaetter, i 8 CI$ N. W"twrth tit$ Clerk E cc: fall #err. C i t1r httormy 4% Pal% Director of Developwrrnt Urvicua ii+�Mra via�aawil • �1 1 � 1 ' f e oF muwrawroN 1m M41N 8,rn*ET CALIFORNIA 02 M 1 OIPVKS OF TM QITY WOW July 279 1981 F Pacific Vocation Vehicles (R. Fmily Dodge) 16655 nth Blvd. Nwitingtoa Beach,, CA 92647 Attention: Rpr Soto o Pms i dent The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its reguler s .tinS held July 201 1981 approved your appeAl regarding Conditional Exception No. 81-8 with findings and conditions. Phase contact the O"rowmt of Development Services for further infor- •- nation - 636--5211. Alicia 0. llantwerth City clerk IM�I:tN:es ;5 r .« r,J q, i now "1 MTV or �11J1�1T1�1 :H INTER-DEPARWENT COMMUNICATION i Q t4 VAa4lei WW meson James W. Palin, 'Director 04.it2 Aftinistr r ps{velopment Services Dl (a) - APPRAL to July 16 F 1991 1 (R PAKILx DODGE) At,tadhsd• ih a typical site plain and elevation depicting the minimum standards that should be applied if the City Council wishes to overturn the Piamin.9 Comission' s denial of tonditiona]. Exception Noy 81-8 . said plan shows s wrought ircri" fence located behind the existing landsoapinga The wrought iron fence has been designed with 'masonry Ions At 20 to 29 feet on center. The fence has a maximum height of feet 6 inchis s, while . thre pylons have a maxim,= height of 6 feet. Also included are suggested findings of approval if the Citycouncil wishes to 6vexturn the Planning Cormissionps denial and approve Condi- tional Exception No, n -c f OR APPROVAL Or /✓C.E. 81;8 .. A VI M W.�l�.l.rL�..W�i.�� .iY � 1�1�1i�r• 4 1a. The sub)4dt property has considerably more frontage than a nonvil, su,;o agency in the same zone and located on the same street. 2* subject auto agency is Iodated on a unique parcel of land bsca�use of its shape and location. fiUWZ"&V C IZION-, " APP�t�wt The neoTarity fence shall be constructed to the approval of the Depart went: of bev*lopment Services in compliance with • standards depicted in , r the site pleri reviewed by the Council and dated July 16, 19 81 . ,r JWP S am t df '' �►ttach�attt JULnn i G CRY OF M MI'11 M11 KAM A�11�IMIIITIIIE � :1 S- max 10.4 P. i �i ,� t L ;�N' 1;'ii_5;�'1 h�n`�%,.fi, r ...— _ _. — � � � T,• ten'. 0 4 w 4' 41 T .c R OUES FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION '�. July 150 1981 &Om#W to: Hostorabla Mayor and City Council &bid by: Charles M. Thompson, City Administrat r IV VY CIT CO`NOM Nr+dpo Ir/. Departa*rit Of DOV610pnOnt: UrViCOS 00 0V*A?L 19 S'AI 4 sF- . 11 APPEAt OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION 81-8 orry atrt emet of Issue, RsoommaWatlan, Anslysis, Fumdln$ Source, Atu meters Actions, Atawhneents: ' 61-CATAWNT OF I S SUZ z Transmitted for the City Council) s consideration is updated informa- tion the appeal of the Planning Comulanion' s denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-8. Conditional Exception 81-8 is a request to permit a five-foot high !once within the 50 foot front yard setback in the C4, !Highway Commercial , District. ANALYSIS: At the May 1S, 1981 City CoubciL meeting, the Council continued action on the Appeal of Conditional Exception 81-8 in order for the staff to met with the appellant and represent:stives of other auto ' agericiees to dtscuss with the appeallant and other auto dealers along Beach Boulevard different ablutions to the front yard seculty fencing. After a meeting with the owners of major dealerships along Beach Boulevard, the staff has formulated the following information for the Council ' s review. It was indicated to the staff that only one of the three auto agencies represented a►t the meeting would construct a security fence along the front" property line in front of the auto display area. The other dealers indicated that the vinoal access is extremely important in auto- mobil& display and sales. Several of the agencies indicated that if the fencing were allowed they may consider it if it were completely removable during. normal Selling hours. All of the agencies' greasent in- dicAt:ed that the majority of theft problems occur after normal business hours and from the rear portions of the auto dealerships . It van also indicated than most every type of security measure has been tried at one time or another by the dif f eaxemt agencies along Beach Boulevard and thefts still continue to be a major problem, even when areas are com- pletely assured by fencing, barbed "wire, guard dogs, and on-premise guards. Staff analysis indicates that security fencing along the front prop- . arty lints would not be widely used by the numerous auto agencies along Beach Boulevard. The: majority of the dealers want as much visual access from Beach Boulevard onto their lots as passible . Analysis also I .t . a ,F �► - Cox* 11-8 B 2 indicates that the major problem of theft and losses from the deal- erships occur after business hours and from the rear portions of the auto a0males. The staff fools that a preparation of an ordinance to allow security fencing within the front yard setbacks for the auto agencies will not be utilised by the majority of auto dealers along Beach Boulevard, nor will it provide the adequate security to reduce the theft and loss occurring with the n=aroue agencies. 1CM I The planning staff is recommending that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional. Exception No. 81-8. The staff further recommends that no ordinance be prepared allowing the security fencing within the front yard setbacks for auto dealers and other uses which require outside stores, -..:. &TRPAATXVZ AC.TIONs r The Council may overturn the Planning COMMi.ssion's denial of Conditional Exception 81- 0 and approve the request for a five-foot high fence within the 50 foot front yard setback. If the Council allows this security fencing for the subject site, the staff is requa sting that the fence be located, at least behind the landscaping presently provided on the sub- jeot site. SUPPORTING l INFORMATION; 1. Bequest for council Action dated May 8 , 1981 Cl :$MB:df rh of t ? Y r r •,y � . . '1 r..•�, R 7;Y�.� ram.+•.' J r py„+, K r 'y •L'd }',�,• ,', ).•' j' Mr . 14 ,. ,. . ,.�6 y . ,'. ' , .,, yK.fyya r , RIQUEPNWOR CITY COUNC"CTION J, rJ� ' +1 K' [iat� may 801981 .. Idia: Honorable Mayor and City Council SW*mMWby Urles V. Thompson, City Administrator h PV#OWW hy1 Department of Development Services " Mod_ CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-8 Ott of Ims. Romomw WWOon, Analysis, Fundirp Source, Altwnetlw Action:,, Attwhawts: Transmitted for City count l ' s consideration is an appeal to the Planning Commission ' s denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-8, a request to permit a 5 ft. high fence within the 50 ft. front yard setback In the C4 (Highway Commercial ) District. MAURY as AR2,1191nt: pacific Vacation Vehicles `„ 1 ions The west side of Beach Boulevard, between ReD. Avenue and Chrysler Drive. To permit a 50 ft. encroachment of a 5 ft. high fence into the required 50 ft. front yard setback and night angle arena in the C4 District. . PkARK tt COMU§IgA ACTION 12N AM IL 21, 19 81 : 014 NOTION BY KENEFICK AND SECOND BY PAONE, CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-8 WAS DENIED WITH THE FOLLOWING 'FINDINGS BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: ZINRING&„XgJa DENIAL: 1. Based can the size, shape, configuration and location of the subject property, there is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances which does not apply generally to the property or glass of uses in the same district. 2. A 5 ft. high wrought Iran fence within the front and side yard setbacks and within the sight angle is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights . 3. There is not sufficient hardship demonstrated to justify approval of this proposal . Approval of this exception would be a grant of special privilege inconsistent upon other similar uses in the area and would set an undesirable precedent. 4 # The granting of this exception mould create a hazardous traffic problem. hd�t �Je I ,1 r 'I �VT , I 1pegil Two AY198r Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Porter, Paone NOES 1 Nona MOM Schumacher AW*%XN I None Conditional Exception No. •81-8 is a request to permit a 5 ft. high fence at 00 , front property line which would encroach into both the 50 ft . required front yard setback and the required sight angle it the C4 District. The Huntington Beach Ordinance Cade allows only a 4 ^9 inch high structure to be placed anywhere within' ' the required setback. The 5 ft. high wrought iron fence has been proposed in order to provide security for an auto agency located on they west side of Beach Boulevard between Heil Avenue and Chrysler Drive . At the Feb:uary 25, 1981 Board of Zoning Adjustments Meeting, the Board considered this application and based on the finding that the applicant could not demonstrate a justifiable hardabip, conditional exception 80-8 was denied . The applicant appealed the Board ' s decision to the planning Commission. The representative of the applicant stated at both the. Board of. Zoning Adjustments and Planning Commission meetings that the fencing would discourage theft and damage to cars on display and would prohibit children leaving school to use the display as a tshortcut+ He further stated that the wrought iron fencing would not detract from the appearance of the street scene and would be designed in a manner to provide visual access through the subject fence. The Planning Staff concurs with the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Planning Commission' s action on this application and the fin4ings for denial . The proposed fence not only has a negative aesthetic effect by encroaching into the front yard setback, but ilso could obstruct visibility to atdjacint properties. The Planning Commission in its deliberation of this matter canr..luded that allowing the fence at the property line would establish a . verb undesirable precedent. Attached is an inter-departmental memorandum from Earle Robitaille, Chief of Police, stating that his department would concur with the applicant ' s .request in providing a 5 ft. high fence to increase the security of the subject property. The staff concurs that some additional security may be needed on the subject site, hovel.er, it is very difficult for the applicant to demonstrate a hardship which can justify the granting of a conditional exception, and which does not appear to be a special privilege, n i K i'�'IYI1rq�:A'1�T7.,qNo �u� n'1+Yf+OSn''•Y I!w r •. A,r �, " � ' G i" ,r,1. . t �efore, the staff concurs with the hoard a �c�niriq Ad ustm�+nti xann3n c j Q ON"ission • denial of the subject •: ,.,,;., t ` ! nai zxc*ption No,, 81_8 is categorlCally exempt under kntY`�q • r t`• f � s. a MACE'S NOt a tic I�p abl$AXIVE . • v. The Planning Commission directed ` e staff to develop deign criteria which � Would Provide security for the businesses along Beach Boulevard without detracting from the aesthetics of the area . Another alternative course of action for the Council would be to overturn the decision of they Board of Zoning Adjustments and Planning COMIssion and grant the Cond.itional Exception. CRMATTA ; 1, Area Map . 2. Planning Commission April, 21, 19a1 Staff Report 3. Letter from Appellant dated April 30, 19al r . C6fP: :JBN s gc i 1 'Prf ambr all La �UIMpNL ""� to i f , \ s� ON.{. .Z r� to fir \•r�� 1 44• '—/ N 13 13 1 c� t�• n cs rf •1 3 � � � 3 • .T} ^� �• f m • rr R P 3 i 3 » M 43 :A 114 mow._ } . s R ��' � � .t �N1;lR ' �tr}�'' ��ry ART��s• 1•. 1i ti� j • 1• 1 r' N ,rye Ox r qP .i 1 •0. r err FAMILY DOD ' 14655 peach ONd a NIRM1111,01on ROAC11 Ce11141rnin 0704 ' 1�I!' 1'hn►��+ I 11A 1 AA� 51�1 ]ol! ' ■LAWM r. heel 1981 Marab 9, 1981 P. o. qou lh0 s;, I�unliniton ktccck, Ca1N. �N>g Board of Zoning Adjustments City of Huntington Beach, Ca. w• dontlemen: • With reference to notice of sction dated 2/75/81for conditional exception 81-8, ve wish to file an appeal. We need the fence to preclude children from using our premises an a abort-cut. They cross tho lot on foot, skate hoards , bicycles, ate. With the care: going In and out, this creates a heal hazard. The fence needs to be high enough that they cannot crawl over easily. The fence will be wrought iron and will not derract from a good appearance. The other factor Involved Is a High percentnge of' •pilferage in this area. A 42" pence is not high enough to discourage unwelcome visitor during the night hours We appreciate your further cons.tderation. of this; matter. Ve rely yours, :i 1t 1 LY D( R KY Sol 1 ' P r�• ' ;j'!''' ',elf* , ( / •'7.r1� 1 t . Q. , �! " �/ ,4•'Ly,1,.v J to RQUSFOR CITY COUNCIC.". )ACTION ' tN Junes 11, 1981 �u1M�tlsd Iss Honorable Mayor and City Council rridbV: Charlels M. Thompson, City Administrator „ M by; Jemes N. Pa►lin, Director of Development Services 7 W: APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONALo EXCEPTION NO, 81-Y8, R FAMILY DODGE. SNIom of Ion# Rewimombtlan,Analysis, Fundlrp Sourus,Altwnadve Actlam, Attaehmsats. At tie 'May 18, 1981 City Council meeting, the Council continued an appeal to the Planning Commission' s denial of Conditional Exception No. 81--81 a request to erect a 5 ft. high wrought r iron fence at zero property line on a site located on the west xide of Beach Boulevard between Heil Avenue and Chrysler Drive. This continuance wry$ to allow adequate time for the applicant to arrange a meeting between the Department of Development Services and other auto agencies along Reach Boulevard in order to discuss alternative solutions related to security for the auto agencies, A number of agencies were contacted and a meet- y Ing was scheduled, however, all but one of the agencies cancelled on, the day of the meeting. The representatives of the auto agency g..oup indicated that another meeting will be scheduled in order for the auto agencies to discuss the numerous security problems � with the City staff . This meeting has been tentatively scheduled for -Tune 19, 1981 . since the applicant of Conditional Exception 91.8 has been very instrumental in orchestrating the meeting between staff and the agencies and believes it would be an Important step to take prior to this item being reheard by the Clay Council. He has concurred with a one meeting continuance of Conditional Exception No. 81--8. Council continue appeal of Planning Commission' s denial of Con. ditional Exception No. 81.8 to the July 6, 1981 meeting, at whieb time additional information will be submitted to the City Council . CiSMB r gc • , moms y2t ,9 i �.EW41• r �.q + e7 t 'r a s�• .'� r. �, ,} yy ,(icy rL'.( ' . . �. w � y /r• i. �a r ,,b, 1 •JiR s,M�iF`r 1�.1..7iJM ll.r l t" r� a..*:.` r ' ,,yti' � �w CTION FM S FOR ' 01V OUNC A I Msy 8, 1.991 gi IkWA i toe Rmorablo Mayor and City council Charlos W. Thompson. Citr Admlristrato • Poem art WI: ft"rtment of Develop "nt services �= C ONDITZON.#L EXCEPTION NO. 01_8 0-11 IR 6fbm, R rna edon, /W@Neb, Furyft Source, AhernWwAetbm, Atto6notts: 2,- ITAT12 ' Or 6MUZ: r Trhnamitted for City Council ' s consideratior. is an appeal to the I Planning isai-in 's denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-8, !; a repot to Pormi t 4 5 ft. hlgb fence, within the 50 f t. front f ynrl site In the C4 (Higtmy Carawrcial) District. The PX nrAnq Commission has recommended that the City Council deny CWmAltional Exception No. 81-8. The staff 's recommendation to the � Comisafte was f of denial. Aonl,icax:ts Pacific Vacation Vehicles UWR&AQJQ1 The west side of Beach Boulevard, between Heil Avenue and Chrysler Drive. To permit a 50 ft., encroachment of a 5 ft. high fence into the required 50 ft. front yard setback and sight angle areas in the C4 District. Z"Im ._C=11112N A=-Uffl ON UBIL A. 19 81 : ON NOTION BY KENWICK AND SECOND BY PAONEt CONDITIONALS EXCM)TION NO* 81-8 WAS DMIED WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS BY THE POLLOWINO VOTE r 1 1 . Based on the size, shape, configuration and location of the subject property, there is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances which does not apply generally to the property � or cuss► of uses in the same district. 20 A 5 f t. high wrought iron fences within the front and side, yard setbacks and within the: sight aingie in not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. Ol'1n�"} roll '�w'",P!T'rh"F�.'1Y.ry.fir r �s;=.r. P ..,��' . y±l b' ,h� wsir ir, r' '!III , 'r- :f. ,'', 1.l r �•�'i inX' .',; •r,1 •n,�a'• '..I ,ill M'`�,�. ;! ,�A E, 07 'U f i I n 1 i 1�J.,•r' va Mw �• ,+ a .� rS,l wFh .. ryrt � '411M. •C' ', r1 lu.1 'lhR J ..�. e _ 'T?,h�;•� 1, ►, 1,h�,, ,r'\y..' , I;�iliAe+ i•.� , Y r, b � I,�•' J'r�T "!� ,11 M ,' IS A ✓Y 1 I'. Y I1I 3+ 4 is not mWaoisat ba"ship d sstrated to justify 1 of this proposal. Apraval of this exception mould we 4 grant of special privilege inconsistent upon other similar Us In the area and would met an undesirable precedent. k 4# . . grAsti" of this exception would ,create a hazardous traffic poll • r • &"Aietor• Resefick, WInchell, Porter, hose ASSIM3 dchmacber ABSTAIN s honey Conditional fteoptian No. 81-8 is a request to permit a 5 ft. high fence at 100 trout property line which would encroach into both the 50 ft, required front yard setback and the required sight angle, in; the N District, ". The Huntington Beach O.dinance Coda ailosra only a 42 Inch high structure to be placed anywhere within;,, tbs required m etb*ck:. The 5 ft. high wrought iron fence ham been proposed in order to provide security for an auto agency located on the west side of Beach Boulevard t►etween Heil Avenue and 3 Chrysler Drive. ? I At the February 25, 1981 Board of Zonirq Adjustments Meeting, the board, considered this application and based on the finding that the app4icant could not demonstrate a Justifiable hardship, conditional exception 80-8 was denied. The applicant appealed the Board' s decision to the planning Commission. Tho J representative of the applicant stated at botb the Board of { Zoning A►djuotments and planning Commission meetings that the I fencing would discourage tbeft and damage to cars on display and would pyrohlbAit children leaving school to use the display as a shortcut. . He further staged that the wrought iron fencing would not detract from the appearance of the street scene and would be designed in a manner to provide visual access through the � subject fence. The Planning Staff concurs with the Heard of Zoning Adjustments and planning Ccsmissiroo's. Miction_cn this application and the finding for denim.. ' The _proposed fence not only hsa. i_•negative • • is effect try encroaching into the front yard seetbatk, but aesthetic aI.so could-obstr.uct visibility to adjacent gropert�.es. The Planninq Co mtiasion in its deliberation of this matter concluded that allowing the fence at the property line would establish a very undesirable: precedent. Attached in an inter.-departmental memorandum from Earle Robitaille, Chief of Police, stating that his department would concur with the applicant's request in providing a 5 ft. high fence to increase the security of the subject property. ' '+ W\�^ A:;' lr�"bd i Q 1 r• '!,�' ) - FY 1 I `'. YI } r �, v •:I "i ��� y, 1 r, i !•� �. 4'." ", ' r•I , 1I r+, .. S,Y� 4+ 4 r r + {� I•.�11 1} r�+rA. r �.�,,�r,����.„(gyp� 'o "1 . � � �:�,i,,., 1 'I }, ,`'; �•i- �1 ri ��•l 5.:4� �At; �� ` `r ''�f4 4WOW# of ,4 ►1 "t may be d on the It to OL�� 1t fer the ll nt to 1t Oftoft oaf Jwftty t of a wit wMat 464m o ppear to so a special prixil r � 1 th t ward ! us r ht o t 4 � � COUN4481CO'a deaiai of the subject application, O"ditional Exception No, 81.8 is catagoricallp exempt under 1=4.I�M Not applicabla. LTho Planning Comisaion- d1rected staff to develop design criteria d which would provide security for the businesses along Beach Boulevard wit bout detracting from the aesthetics of the +area. ,A►aother alternative course of action for the Council would be j to overturn the decision of the Board of Zoning Adjustments and y Planning Coo nission and grant the Conditional Exception, 1. Area Map 2, Planning Cc anission ,hpr•il 21, 1981 Staff Report ` i ti 3 . Lettar from Appellant dated April 30, 1981 CWT ;.TRNagc w: I r yA I w r ;7' 11 ti � l{, � +� � — r , i, _ � � ►+'' I 40 •,It,k�:`,:hy�, t� �I 40 th r,'V �u , 11�� • ' 1. �,�� •,, � ,� u �)'� � : �, 11 r 1 r,r<b�M 6 n ,g ;4+'�► •h!�' � �'�f�t+"� l 1 IJ 1 ,1 y �J1 •. 1 � N 1 E J • R C O E f 4 wu. E 1NLI SL U 57 if dm� r + ;) n00 � .'i.. _...ill._...... LL J\ U a _ J 10 G U _ � 0 1 � TrE 'a. W. r ■ a r �� N rx c� idE 1 i' y 1. � •Y ,�I F�` ' 1 •. KIM ' , 1'i` 1�`� �+ Ir a .. +.1 ,. r t• ,1 � j. I •1 � `Ir� 'Zh 1+1 �r rp.A,t; tiC yy.n 1 + �, M•R�, • '1�� M M t lb'� ! 9 N T - A. ','R."�. InIr1R t^A `� � it>•.4� '• ,.� ' A .� •'L'i , 1 9^� tY �r^I n ,'I ,r ��i�.1 •�7�A• r, A M P 1 • " ,,, FV..T. r wr l DODGE 1�1 n I4566 Beech lllvd. • Muntington Beach, Cofifo►nia 62647 Phone 17141 847 5615 r r WUNT1FfCM MAW • ��11NCi "Mill' MAR Horeb to 191 P. CL ag log Nem nn �oadw Cam. am a card of Eeaidg Adjustments City of *fttivatoh $each, Ca. 1 ,�1 AN "r 1 �e4tle�ellt • (; with reference to notice of action dated 2/25/81 for conditional exception 81-•80 we wish to file an appeal. I We need the fence to preclude children from using our premises as a short-cut. 4 They cis the lot on foot, skate boards, bicycles, etc. With the c6rs going In and out, this- creates a real hazard. The fence needs to, be high anough that they cumt crawl over eosi.ly. The fence will be wrought'.- iron and will not detract from a good appearance The other factor involved is a high percentage of pilferage in this area. A •42" Fence is not high enough to discourage unwelcome visitor during the night hours We appreciate ./our further consideration of this matter. 1 i; Ve ly youi;s, R L 1 1• i 1 1 Y e s � i• r Y yr 4 �i �k����9rµCi1',}y{43,*•"'r r �. � /'.' �lT,1w(,'%�'•R;'"^'4�"JP(. e . • .. . ,f� 74 Y 41�' ff 4unth*w beach developml services departmem A EPOR WOOMMOW TO: Planning Commission FROM: Devel nt Services• DAM Aprillo'l, 1981 LI,C :- Pacific Vacation Vehicles DATI A6(4' PTED: DBA R Family Dodge Marche 9 , 1981 16555 Seadb Boulevard. Huntington WAach, Ca . 92647 : 60 days from close of Pacific Vacation Vehicles Public Haairing DBA h Family Dodge ZQUi C-4 (Highway 16555 Beach Blvd . Comer c is l) Huntington Seam, Ca . 92647 GEN?A&JtW: fl9WESTs To permit a 50 ft. encroachment General Commercial of a 5-ft. high fence into the required 50 f t . front yard set- qXJfiT= UAJi back and sight angle. Auto sales lot OCA'�t0: Looted on the west side of Beach Boulevard, between Heil Ave. and Chrysler Dr. CRM91c E 'C The staff is recommending that the Manning Commission uphold the Board of Zoning Adjustments , denial of Conditional Exception No. 81.-8, a request to construct a five (5 ) ft. high wrought iron fence at Zero property line for an auto agency on Beach Boulevard. Conditional Exception No. 81-8 is a request to permit a five: (5 ) ft. high fence at a vero front property line, which would encroach into both the 50 ft. required front yard setback and the required sight angle. This fiver (5) ft. high wrought iron fence has been proposed An -order to provide security for an auto agency located on the west side of Reach Boutetverd between Heil and Chrysler Dr. At the February 25, 1901 &mrd of Zoning Adjustments ' meeting, the Board denied said kequostf the applicant has appealed the Board 's denial . ft I i I A FMi31 j I 1 11 firr I •1 I i I Y 1 .'. lo one CS I .yam 111��4,1�.r■ After reviewing the subject request, the staff has identified the following issues; 11. Is there a hardship which will ju3tify the granting of a conditional excerption? 2. . Will the propoond fencing hamper emergency response to the subject site? 4.0 VVIROMMAL STAITUS s Pursuant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality Act, ' the requested conditional exception is a Class V categorical exemption. S. 0 SURROUNDING LAVID US21 ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN MM IGNATION: The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Chrysler Drive and Bench Boulevard* and is presently zoned C -4 , highway Cormtercial. Thq subject property is presently de;vf:lapeed with a vehicular sales agency and is designated on the Gene-al Pl ar. as General Co-.Maercial. Sub Jact property is abutted on the north and the .west by the Orange County Flood Control Channel. Adjacent to the Channel, the property 'is zoned, general planned, and developed with single family residential dwellings. The property located to the east o!- the Stab jest site, across Beach Boulevard is also zoned C--4 , designated on the General Plan as General Commercial and is developed with commercial units. To the south of the subject site, across Chr;sler Drive, the property Is stoned C=2 , Comtaunitly Business District# F,nd developed with a small shopping center and is designated on the General Flan as General Commercial, 6. a ANALYSIS: � Conditional Exception 91-8 is a request to construct la five (5) ft. high ' wrought iron fence along the property line of an existing auto agency on beach Boulevard. The Huntington Beach Ordinance Code allows only a 41, i:xh ' high structure to be placed anywhere within the required setback. The setback at this location is 50 ft. from the ultimate right-of-way Along Lieach Boulevard and 10 ft. along Chrysler drive. Thereefore# the premised five IS) ft. fence along the front, and exterior property line Vould encroach 50 ft. into the required front yard and 10 ft. into the required side yard setbacks. At the February 25, 1981 Board of Zoning Adjustments' meeting , the Board Considered this request and based on the finding than the applicant could not, demonstrate a justi-iable hardship,. Conditional Exception 81-8 vies denied. The representative of the applicant stated in his address to the board that the fencing would dieourage theft and damage to care on display and would prohibit children leaving school to use the display an a shortcut. He further stated that the wrought iron fencing would not distract from the: Appearance of the street scene and would be designed ix: a rAnner to provide visual access through subject fence. {,'r i; , r R , IIl . i. 1•. a �, +, 'i r � + ;�� � t��`� 1'I�Wjrg',' g ?I�i, ` r • t . 1 � " � rti. .. " t''�'• r, y° I 'a�Mf aY fi� 7 �^"i ' � 1 '1G t ^ "4 ,tom f 1 1 fvi'}• � i •y� ,l✓ff'v1 f 11 ;aIr1 "" �1ti' 1 a,It "' ., h, ,.Ow, C1 •/tin '^ + .. 4s r .� IF!"ll' rtiay� ',r�.� .Ya�:i•i.'Rkid'."a•1....%�}+ �auy r' w•..ir. '1� i' . ' slow$ qM ry'I 16 ft&rd of 20ning Adjustments' finding for denial was as follows t 1. erg -is not sufficient hardship demonstrated to justify approval of this propoeal. approval of this exception would be a grant of special privilege inconsistent upon other similar uses in the f area and would set an undesirable precedence. in addition, granting of this exception would create a hazardous traffic problem as well. as fire protection difficulties. � The vote was unanimous for denial . The py arming staff csoncurs with the Board of Zoning Adjustments ' action � on this 'application and the finding for denial . The proposed fence not � Y e �:a�► re into tho T ired setboak, but also wwroaches into the � r aired �r�.oht angle, which was developed to provide visual access to adjacent properties and visual access for vehicular traffic . ; Jkttached is an interdepartmental memorandum from Earl Robitaille, ► Chief of Police, stating than his department would conger with the ' applicant's request in providing a five ( 5) f t. high fence to increase the security of the subject property. j The staff concurs that some additional security may be needed on the subject site, however , it is very difficult for the applicant to demonstrate a hardship which can justify the granting of a conditional exception and which does not appe&r to be a spe::ial privilege, therefore* the staff concurs with the Shard of Zoning Adjustments dencial of the subject application. 1 .0 RECON M RATION: ' This staff is recamending that the Planning Commission upheld the Board of Zoning. Adjustments ' denial of Conditional Exception No. 81--8 and deny said appeal with the following findings: PINOINGS FOR DENtAL 1. Based on the size , shape, configuration, and location of the subject property, there is no exceptional or extraordinary circumstance which .� does wt apply generally to the property or class of uses in the same district. 2. A five (5) ft. high wrought iron fence within the front and side yard setbacks and within the sight anglep is not Necessary for the preser- vation and enjoyment of substantial property rights. 3. Tbare, is not sufficient hardship demonstrated to justify approval of this proposal. Approval of this exception would be a grant of special t privilege inconsistent upon other similar uses in the area and would set an undesirable precedent. a i i r .1+N'i. I ' / 1 f `.iA I �'� .j ,�^. HAY wfi i :� r '•�' lot � �+I` � F'� { rL 1c>s•-1► ��Vc r , xy^ �i,.,•. ti,('� !,. '2Y y� •!�MV�' � �'�Ip�'� fi rT�y� "; k� y�,f ft o155 � •y,( ti J Y i. . 1 �1' w , . y4Y Ir ,f . r1lyT, , , I CO L*I-a POP ,rig I, •, y�•I 1{ � Y, :'1 �f�t� �1.��1 •, f I 1 �•f 1 .3 �a1M� ' .rM' 1'�iAt'/1'1 � "`I .f"I��n�^..� Y �.1�^may{Ty�1^1'r{�1. {• y ,� 1 • qq��rrentin4 Of this OX00Ption would create a hawdour ptabl+�� traffic Olga AMCM0=i 1. Area Map tt t a from the applicant reoeived and -dated March 90 I98L Mtmntas Gf W 8oaX•d of Zoning Ad j ugtmsnts a meeting dated 7QWU*vy 215, 1881 # t'"t+x4* . r ntti Memorandum from FArl W. Robitaiilep dated March 00 8i site Man i' L�r 1 __, � i �- ... iw�.ip• ,'*;, �h ••'r /. N"yax ti�t'� i,-, r`.f r �^•,. iM, �SJ Jr� �: ''t 1{ �v4•..ir�4 `� �r � • � 40 f• r 7, �„1 , :. -rF . • „Y / 'ti' n-�4�I r iwthQY ,JKh h .i i4, „4 .L ..r V!w1'w ,�•1r11 , A!" MINUTES r►�► RUNTINGT% BEACH • 50AIND Of'' ZONING ADJUSTMENTS Rope B-80 Civic contel 2000 Main Street Huntington beach, CA. ,',.. N Zvi l9E l.s 15 F .M. • 'y S� Uippa , Tindall, Kelly AiWTX$i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF DECEMBER 31 , 1.980 , FEBRUAAY 4 , FEBR4'A K','. 11 , AND FEBRUARY 19, 1981 WERE DEFERRED MUL,A.R AGEWA ITSMS s atYl� 4/1� I .Ni�+�• CONDITlONU EXCEPTION NO. 81"8 A plicaht'• Pacific vacation Vehicles M f f.frr.a.r♦.rf.�f i■rA��f.�fa i fr.�.ra r��.rr.rr. To permLt a five (5) foot fence at 01 front property line within fifty (50) fset of front setback and eight angle . Subject property 1'a located on the west side of Beach Boulevard between tfeil and Chrysler Circle (16555 Beach Boulevard) This request is a Categorical Eltemption Class 5, r"alifornia Envirorvaenta ) Quality Act. Chai,rmon Tindall introdured the application to the Board . Secretary Gipps briefly outlined the application, stating that the applicant was requosting a few of approximately 60 inches high, eighteen (18) inches higher than allowed by Code . He noted that the Board had not previousl granted a request of this type. Chairman Tindall opened the public hearLJ&, fto . PAy S4tn was pteeent to represent the application . He stated that tom,, i,tion of the. fencing would discouragetheft, damage to c' pirs on q&CAy and would prohibit children leaving schbol to come onto lot . "Puirr, the fencing is decorative in design and would not detract from the appearance of the area (wrought iron design) . Cb►aii-man Tindall questioned the applicant regarding the type of gateau tC- be• located at the entrance. Mr. Soto stated that 'the gates would be staurity type gAtes on rollers . Mr. Sato submitted photos of sites in 8i4way City where such security fences are located. Mr . Bute stated that the cost of security is escalating due to the constant pilfering duving evening hc%ur-0 . Fire Representative Kelly noted that the request did ;got constitute a hardmfiip, as other recourses were available. 0, M do ,I I. ,. Aiidi.,;: � •5F1n ..,.ri..: . ' •.. , ;I 'YL 10 'F`I • Ir y + 1 1 •' : N�* F�QAINb low i wr3 ADJUSTMENTS r 39 loll r, Secretarry Lippe stated that the reguaLt was not compatible with highway xoniinq, therefore settincT a precedent. He recommended that the appliaanl most frith crther dealerships in the area and collectively approach the City Council to ravine the Code to allow for this type of security , fencing . There being no othet persons present to speak on the request, Chairman Tit%del l closed the public hearing,, Further Board discussion followed. EW 140TI", AY LIPPS AND SECOND BY KELLY, THE BOARD DENIED CONDITIONAL EXC2PT'IO N0. 01-9 BY TRZ VOLL0WMP 'VOTE, Willi REASONS A3 FOLLOWS : RASOM FOR DENIAL: There is not sufficient hardship demonstrated to justify approval of this ptopo"l. Approval of this exception would be a grant of special pri ileges .inconsistent u'pon other similar uses in the area ` and would set an undesirable precedent. In addition, granting of this exception would create a hazardous traffic problem as well as fire protection difficulties . AYES: Lipp,, Tindall, Kelly WOES: None ABSXNT: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-9 Ap l icant:ems L. Jacobs To permit a two foot encroachment into required main access and a nineteen (19) foot front yard setback to allow access to a front on garage located aw 207 Alabama Street . IN CONOUNCTION WITH: CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-11 � l ARpl�irant: Thomas L. Jacobs u I r li To permit a two (l) foot encroachment into required main access at 209 Alabama Street. This request is a Categorical Fxeauptao:i Class 5, Cali.forn,t4 Envireruaentai Quality Act, 1970. Mr. Thm Jacobs was prcoent to represent the application. Secretary Lippe briefly outlined the application . Chairman Tindall opened the public hearing. S 1i, � f�N}q1*iy�� ,�'Kr {u •r yE•7 A•�4.,�r "ry 3M- ' Y :r '�y •.oh C � ' �, - � � . tine ''Y.t! ^'A•, " " r, �, fLAUa FeaAitfJ 10MIN i A[.,#JUOT!'ISNTS rrr aocr*taty Lipps stated that the roquest was not compatible with •highws,y sonic, therefore settinq a precedent. tie recommended that the app iCan meet with other dealerships in the az .a and collectively approaich the City CoUnail to revises the Code to allow for this type of security fencing - There being no o thet persons present to speak on the requeest# Chairman Tit dat'i 'elosetd the public hearing. rtheer board discussion followed. ON M*I w iy Lipp AND SECOKO BY KELLY r THE BOARD DENIED CONDITIONAL UMPT16N NO. 61-1 EY THk rotLOWING VOTE, Yr'1T1f REASONS AS FOLLOWS s AFASON FOR' DENIAL S There is not sufficient hardship demonstrated to justify approval of this proposal. Approval of this exception would be a grant of f special pti.vi.leges ,inconsiste3nt upon other similar uses in the area and would set an undesirable precedent. . In addition, ,granting of this exception would create a hazardous traffic problems as well as fire protection difficulties . AYES : Lipps, Tindall, Kelly NOSS: None ABSENT: None CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 51-9 Applicant: Thomas L. Jacobs To permit a two foot encroachment into required main access and a nineteen (19) foot front yard setback to allow access to a front on garage lm=ted at 207 Alabama Street. i 111• CONOURCUON WITH: 9 CONOI`fIONAL, EXCEPTION NO. 81-a 11 M13cantr . Thomas L. Jacobs To permit-x two (2) foot encroachment into required main access at 209 Aiatbaeaa Street. This request is a Categorical Exemption Class 5, Callforrel,ii Znviran aental Quality Act, 1970 . "r ThM Jacobs was present to represent the application. Secretary Lippe briefly outlined the application. Chairman Tindall opened the public �� l�iaxi,tg. a•V r M � rj..Y� :N0,4 • . .* n• IL .I'a. f•, .li.�rr. .l...M•v1. n � .',1� 1�.w.., dC8 . . r•r✓tv.i' . ..A.J .y•„ .xi4',nf. . .. u.ev ..f . . . fA w WIV Or "UNTINGTOWN111INV H y INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ,To JIN PMM, Diretinx R-AyFrom EWZ W. Karmuum r . Services ens Chief of Police r fact Date Hum 1.9 1"1 4 ' f sea ngLwating' that sm i imnside ration be given to a request fit Ow Fmily► 0xigej, 16555 Bmchl, B tkgbm Huh, fro► inareaee tl* height of a faem'as secswit y fw the burin a fxvm the 40-inch f hsight 41ed by city to a 5-foot Nd9 t. It is nay Lwouing that they have a m4uwt before the Planmb q 0nt lasiC,�rt to i.n=emse the height of this farm to fnprove the momurit y of theiroar lot. Rhe additiewl heio tad a®rtafst].y k=mase the m=ity of the butsi rom. This ]ocatim has been the vim of nummum thefts. • � : am ' d ice Vw tmnt tar eontac�tAd by a Mr. "busty" Boyd, a . rt tow'woenteltiV'a for auto dears from the Fanvers Inowance �1 t :oW. He ndvised that this is a ration of the Farmers +' it ltr+srioe Givip to prevent theft. it should also be realized that the oww is going to bvnsidarable expaim to meet their suggestion I w d ir=mse their security. Crime ttatget tardsning is a coal of the polite . t. The history of fret I rowan m shma that at 1watimW whom these types of precautims have been takes, the daft,rate is gmtly reduced. This move would assist `** police risr hoasmas a. we have to prooem the perk involved In reporting V= 00tm3 rasticn in this m'tter would be apprwiated alie r• f • 1 '•'I•I 1 f Of mlioe •�VK,, L�tsged Y I w. L' P ' r ,�' ', C��" � �, 4'r' � �!�'•'14`,� '� '� � , r� �Cs�� "�F�'�F��`Iltl.� +•,� � ..; "1 .. Y i ..'f '' n� N' _n PAM- / MO .0�' t� w �L 1J1� ��p�Sb '�� '�' ' i^1 S { .,, w •r� Wt k,K. M t �r , �'�' i��rc'�� tow,*a 92647 Phone (7141 •47►•5516 V.Solf wz �' �• M'MM � Ilua&Wjs Vdda3.M-DBA 1 7 17 Stu .PVT� .r A�� , � �• ' ' i 1 r' A&L OR 1 back ft � Los domil ao tba basis tb" • hazard to the hblia do" ozUt, s ttlMer 1t ImUt-ta cw t to CM City of 8=t1v4to& Sal. vhiaa awe mW abold b4 *"U"O V "ei o!ty CowmU that the Public a1mM ,with the Alt be Vad by in dwqe I the ordiumee whIA vo*14 Waw 60" 1 a# y , • A i , 1 i r i _ ��JS.l:s�i�6 v♦�.tL.�...`��e.,,.l�.'.'.� _.'._,�. .si:a- _... .,:,.�''},,�dS'iP:.:�is._ ._ ... irT ,i 1 �,, !' p.Y�1 ►fir, Rv ' ,� �'y,�J j • orb ,Y ,����E����` ,t'�, ;` f�+v ,�7'� ' 4�`�80891, FAMLY ;1 A INN jam 130 cr ! lit or a ►! �1i �► roqu t for the hearing sabedu xld for July d,, l9pl S � At41 July 100 1901 as Kr. Key Soto Will be out of tarn ttt a be unable to attwW, `YTh4ak you. } ., sincerely, , PAC371C VACATION VOICLU DU It IPAHILX DODGE Uwa axle, • ttli�i �li,prg1� h • ,`}, .. it . 1t1.1 ►� P. 0. O���c 190 " ftwk CA a i r+' ell.J/• Y J' AVt,vi 4, ✓wA I'00 � y i�yIti?M .'�'• I M �i!�1� «r I r`< r jTi;Yyr$'� r 5� r'• ^ + , ,`v' t},�, 2 �ryJ 5�� :� r� �� .iL A ��. ��, �71'. a'i� 064 +J� yi r0 R{� Jar11' N "� � � ICr' ` t� � �f�.81 rY'� •,� r�,igr� � r y �i r a �� Y��} • �� J-+ '1 A AIf•�Yir. jrvo, TV y JAI ON MEA=4 '�+.r r r�+1vh'"itCr*',wr..:v'' rr � �,.... JI_ey�'r, :..'A r iS w w �►MiN r rr � Y F r• Y'• Y+.+ T� .. Atus Aw Soto Wi l of the Ci tt4y Of "Ot1 such �Ot tlww�l�sion as Ow1 J 10 Owrt at Dw1nt � it lwttne Mb my 90003000 sow 1 : I _ � I i • i 1 � r •I �fv I 14 ,y 1 4O( a4,04"..,k�; •,`k1 �� r 'may, LI 7�ry q mw Court k. MA"CW CAt.M)RNIA f By CiiUNCIL ay 0"Dar*1 c4m attr of t't1t w M M'M'A1 lw. Ct.E1tlt Mtsrim We fits J. Richter It"t so* d at an ft" ioaad w atth"d *0 va4ad auft+ww do aka dt iwrmv-aw raM,and"i @ a an a pasty �GIs w +ss►d*d n SUN; tbLAt t am the poknipsi a w+ i"wl ;;blkm Yfa u City at Womt 1 ttan Ned of� ad W" M pubtkw tar the�� a .- �pal�of a c mm. lair. ma *hub at ait sbw bwia smupaw hoe am so bw a bum IN I Nat at WM bar baaa I ed pRtaW &W pub. IEaiwd ra�riar h�Meaa it Iba acid llelua�y a[t?raota far a avmmd is a p a!%so Iwo VOWA d to ebe eater at� warp ..�1 uet or wp C 109fh irw daoa,ta►WdW praalty d PWWY 04 tb*%Ma- +1�4 tMra arat w r ��1M~►+�li.�t�0 *•� 'tit � _�e ? } �' 41 rs Q ,S � � 1� � +6j J•, 1 ,+�`�' .4ti�i ,: I �"' �`r �a�M I J,rNy c to jv � � r .���y •tit Illy N FANILY 00001 14665 0446h IWO, • HUMI ►G10n baiOh, C8100MIS 92447 � Phon* (7141 047-5018 � * ova .+.+ to 0 v4catift Vablel4 a DU R Padly Dofte k M�Ili4t the Vic' of 8aatiaStou J"ch City Council eonoidorr the M*Ucstlo a UP.tows at -0- el di■ aft set back. Map t 41 an Cho bask that a herd to the f4lia do" exist. with U*"Mt Wlt-lm 'cost to the City of Nimin$ton beak„ which one esd 1k oftitift tlri CIO Caaeell that chits .hlie &I with chit Business ca -mnity C600 t �O sired by a cMfte In the ordLumas which would allow 60" leacLo* 1• 4' Ott •r' i1 {{ K' 1 li f� 1 1 j • y 7 Polish 80_' i_ ,081 NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING AREA!. TO THE PLAIINI I NG C"I SS I ON'S omiAL w CONorrimAL EXCEPTION NO. 9�=� NOTICE IS WMEBY GIVEN tkt a public hearing will be held by the Pity Council Of the MY of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beacho at the hour of �,;,� P.M. , or as soon thereafter as + possible on AX thir ....�$ i....,�, day of 198, 1 .. for the purpose of c4nsi oaring an appeal to the Planning Comi s s ion's r ecomanda ti on for denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-81, a request to construct a five (6) foiat i high wrought iron fence at- zero properiky line on a site located on the west side of Beach 8oulowd betters Hail Avenue and C.hryslor drive in the C4 (xighway Comercial) District. 1 d All interf$tad persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their *P?nion$ for or spinet sold appal FWthlr i3ft files Agar be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Mbin Str"t, 1 MM$*torn RMChs, California. 9MS - (714) 636-6227 DATED CITY OF HUMTIMGTOl� BEACH ._.� ,.�x, 1�,.�.�,r.�.,�..,. By: Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk + ll � Fr y r,IVA • c MICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING TO: CITY CLBRK'S OFFICE DATE : _ _ _ ..-..,..,.- PLEASE SCHAMA A FUILEC REARM USING THE ATTACHED LEGAL NOTIUr. THE my or , ,.....��..._.. _� list . P' sire att�ctted At's will follow No At's i Init iat*4 by: 1 i Planning comieston Planning• Dopertment Petition * Appeal Other Adoption of Envirammotal Status (x) YES NO Rotor to ,�4sN �,1�1�T,�_- .�., Planning department - Extension # for additioaol iafoxm tlon. * If aeg2a1, please transmit exact vordiag to be required in the legal . r F i .war , • / 01 •., P�blish,�,•` � WTICM OF F MLIC WART NG MMICE IS NEUDY OWN that a public hearing will be held by the , City Cowell of the City of Owtiogton Mach, in .the Coane i l Cher of the Civic Center, Owtinston leach, at the hour of P.M. , or rs som tlwro*fter as page ible , an the deny of Mog 19X., for the purpase of considering &v% � �� 4 o ALt 4 Loobvw �� ? ,�,o�6 vot t o ^j8k+� ^ -for �fwq�.t 1 o EXL1 No- oil -if ? k 4V i &_ llw�.L- vA JL lo#.m 4161 Vft 4%'t 1AM4 %,10%fik j �e 41.06(t V-11h. Wk L% e uo All inurested pe r+ssw ars invit*4 to ettmd said hearIN and es their P� opirlioas for or a4aim t said i (_&Ce p 4cr-..A3b. *l-jr l ctber l t(ftWUoa rosy► be ObtaAmd trum for Otf im o! tbs City Ciork. Op' WNIMM UACM t IL iicatvaz" fiftl tyr �itr�ttic .. . •.w wr ram.••mow•• w.•w r...•. .. ...... ..- .. '32--100-01 Jam P Fwtt LAP #81-8 1 xd�� w e6611 4 At � lot 1981 ON) �13�-1 � �• � t flaw 'Z` I, L 16613 � Amunibu ►. I V/y • � 1 •� 154U nop000d vowtolmimlo a .••'�'�,'ti f•r I i 91693 932-100-04 itxM►id R W1,t aMs 16617 wiftp-at XvM 9"47 WARD Of • l -... _..�w..�.w�MAr.w.-�R`� ' .Y.�MwM.Ir.w�F••4..� .w ... .N [\K_A Pacific Vbmtum vabiol a MIL 142-172-ld It Family Dodge ` �»ld E i.,L,l;yist 16555 Blvd. y l�, 19� �Jtl) 7822 Rh}fi; [Five Ifuntinom emdk-,MW WbUrqkjh jam, c)&Llf 92647 d c.ALYSJ.ar aac ► i1 17 142--17 - 4 J.600 U. a ti 11i11 f m 70".2 MAk t ive , Cal !' 92647 i r }, `.�', ;�as, �•�I,• •,�: +- :is . . j 1A2�•17 r'.k ,�,' , OraVa CaU aW r1cod Mnttol `van" CM*V Pad �. :,, ,r 1. � District i; Ui etrit', • P.C. Holt 1078 � i U1X721W RA"tv Y•`-, '.•r� &, C" Smt& Am, CAli.f 92702 P.O. am 1919 '� 142 173-01 �I : i , Z► Um ord L Abel I' 4�2•!1 vl� 640 VU Licb Nc cd �r , f N94pmt Rancho Calf 92663 i 107•401-04 142-172-01 "47 C11Td n A Brush Gadvad L SatNUX ' At NWWt�a0attna3.1 133a►02 oar Stsvet 300 MCDAin #vem WmtMilm"C, C1if 8410 *0 C014 Mdorsib Boach, Cb►lif 90279 92603 a 142-172-02 4U=10 107-401--32 Aidwxd L ins Ot 4 n matin Hums 7932 Rnivas DrivM `,Wiv* 24910 7dm Mmmt Pd i ► s,Cjbam aab,C�l3rvtC4 �Mrorh. lif HJd m f3i.3.l , Calif � 0�b{l7 91302 142-172 -03 3a6 ►i7,�'-11 1.07-401•-23 kakom cwri= Side 00r*m 7922 9UM Ete` ve ,. ii 16164 lbrtWA CirGIS � ! 92647 92649 r 14 a-172-,041 hi;.; w7 1 4it of iftawkwter LOCUM QK%ft 7y12 Ahir�R � �*� �r��ir �� �`�,� � • I I a amok, CRU 92U3 92647 142'-1�2-�i L�-172iw12 1i�tl��t� " rclol �i�iAt ! •, 13211 ar nc oa St C' 7N2 IMM`Aries , y 1S1�tdc, l 92�4y • ' u w.1M r a� 1� ciTy i � H rvrip BEACH �,....... _„�...,� 20M MAIN STREET CAL, "ORNIA 02648 OFFICE of THE VATY CLERK May 20, )981 a Family o►od8e 16555 aeach Blvd. Huntington lkwch, CA 92647 Attn: My Soto, President The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular eating held NorWay, May 16, 1981 continued decision on your appeal to the Planning Cemission's denial of CF 081-8 to the June 15, 1961 meeting. Please contact the Departwmt of Development Services if you have are questions ; 536-5211 . Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AN;CO:cd cc: Jinn Nalin, Director of Development Services r� a00b 1 NOTff_ P PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NNUM C�OMMISMON'S A!'�RL TO 1 'EAL TO THE PLANNING COMMI331 N'S DENIAL.OF MR61TIMAL EXCEPTION NO.61.4 d` 'AL cif`CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION N�.8i4 NOTICE ell HEREBY GIVEN tha a public hrearinq will be meld NOTICE 18 HEREBY GIVEN that a public herring will be heW ble the City OMWAR at tare City of Hurnlr4.Jn Baaeh,in the by Cho City Council of the City of Huntl#tgton Beady,in the Coutreil Chwokm of Litt Civic Canter,Huntington Bradt,at Council Chamber of the lavic Conner, Huntington Batch,at the hour of 1.30 P.M,or a erwn th4nmf w a Possible on the hour alp 7:30 p,m.,or as roan ttwwher as possible on Momley the 18th day of Aby,1L11 far the purpoto of Monday the 18th day of hay, 1001 for the our"of oan.idrrrinpl an appeal to the Manning Commission's soommen- ao wW6ri..,f an appeal to the Plennirp Cortmholon's recommnn- dation for danW I of Conditional Exosption No. F14,a request lotion for denial of Conditional Exceptior,Na.61-8,v repot �f to construct a five(51 foot hI0 wrought iron fence at two to construct a five(51 foot high wrought iron fames at Fero f property line on t seta bested on she west side of Beach property line an a•,its lorstwi oa the west A*of%wct. 1 Boulevard betvwra HNI Awrnur and Chryt!er 0iIva In the C4 Boul,ward betwt;on Hail Avenue and Chrysler Drlt,: !n the C4 lhighwoy Do wnervia!) district. (Highway Corr.ffwelal)District. 1 All intimated persord err invited to attend fs id hoaring and All Intaraded parsom are invited to attend raid henrirrg end k exprew their opinions for or agsinat Fuld appose. @%prom their opinions for ar wpaintat mid appeal. Fwttw in ww0ion waV b a olntaln W from tha Office of the Further information my be obtained from the Office of the J.. City Clark,2000 Maim StrsW,Huntington Brash,CA 92618 City Clerk,3t100 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 926" ` (714) 535w62V 1714)538.5327 'I Detest: May 4.1Sol Dntr,d: AOV 4,1961 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: ALICIA M.WEN"ORTH By: ALICIA M.WENTWORTH uiy C W* City Imark r Pub. 5,17/81 Pub.517/81 l Hunt.ftoslr Ind. Hunt.Beech Ind. i NOTICE OF PUIILIC Hr-%AINCI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO TH9 PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPEAL TO THE,'ILANNINO COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO.814 I DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO.814 f NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be hold NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN that a public hoaring r.•111 be hold by the Gity Council(of the City of Huntington Beech,in the by the City Council of the City of Hurrdngton Such,in the Qostssall tltanirer of the CWe Cantor,Hrmtirglore Beech,at Council Char*w of the, )vie Cantor,Huntington Bosch,at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,or as aeon thereafter as possible on the hour of 7.30 P.M.,or n soon thereafter as possible on M*ndey tin ieth dry of May, IN for the purpose of Nbndsy tine I Orb day of f y.1981 for the purpose of I rorodirinil an appeal to the planning Commission's recomman• cdnnisNring an t+ppoel to the Planting Commission's nsrommett- datien for denial of Conditional Exception No.81-8,a request , dation fbr dankil of CooWltiontl ExcalWon No.8143,a rtrquest to co"ouvet a few(51 feat high wrought iron fence ti we to construct a fiva(6)foot Mpthr taroughe Iron fence at nwo ' property lint:an t" located an the eat aide of Beady property fine on a site bested on the weal side of Beach Bswia Fed bmvwm Mail Avenue vend Chryaier Delve In the C4 Boulevsre betvwon Hell Avenue and Chrysler 1 Wwo in the C4 IMLIMuw" Caernartreiel)Distelat. (Highway Commorcial) District. { All Into anted parsons we invited to attend wW Ireering tar! AN lntereatsd pwa m are invited to attend Mid hearing and exprow thalr ople0o no to,or oolnst still appeal. exprm th*Ir opinions toe or again acid appeal. 77 Further hrfornsatiorr n oy be abfained trorrn the CNfie4 of the Furtive information nmw be obtelned from:he Of loon of rho Oty Owk,30t'10 Main ftva,Hwrtlepton Bitch,CA! 41141838•111=7 City Clerk,2000 Main Street,Huntington Beach,CA b.;M►a (f 141 $3B•52V Orttads May 4,101 tlatdd: May 4,1901 CITY OF HUNTINGTM BE&M CITY OF NUNTINOTON BEACH t �►: ALICIA M.WENTINOATN By., ALICIA M.WENTVWRrH ' City C kirk Cfty pale • rear.+sn� �.�n1 PlWW.No i Ind. H".Bleach Ind. t ' F ...` IN Tliv Superior Courfi � .KTATF Or UAI.IFOHNIA In and for the County of Ora-ge A CITY OF HUNTI aTON WEACH9 CITY CLERK �u�LICATiOh'_ �_ Pub Iis HearirW @i 02 State of California 1 CountvofOrange ? Rita J• Richier p Th;' 1 am and at all times ho,,,-ein rae.itiunad ivap a citizen of t..r united States,over the agi r.wenty•one ye�:s,and chat 1 AM not a prrty to,nor intaresteJ in the above entitled mutter; ' that I min the principal cl-trk of the printer of tho Huntington Beach Ind. Review ■newepaper of general cirr•!lation,publish-d in'.he City of Hwt1r9ton Iksch T Count of {hangs ar.J which newwpalm• in pubitshed for the diaeanination of local news end intellig:nce of a general charac- ter, end which newspaper at all timet, herein mentioned had and still has a botis fide xuhecription list of paying subscribers, and which nem"per has been established, printed and pub- � lished of regtel:r iatervala in the said County of Orange for a period eiosseling one yow; that the rotice, of which the annexed is a printed ccrpy, has been puullshod in the regular , and entire ieeue of mid news;mper, and not In any supplement thereof,on the following dates,to wit: April 99 IM I certdfy(or declare) under penalty of p:rjuvy !hat the forego. ;rrg is truo and cntm-t. Dated at.. ....... .....iMr tf ........ .. ...... Calipow �1 �- ,, r* REST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTIN •'`� i r Date April 10, 1981 &ibmittsd to: Honorable Mayor and City Council AP RP OY" BY CITY ClVNCYL SubmkUd by: Charles W, 'Thompson, City Adminint Ptspmed by: Department of Development Services 4 �.�.1 Tv GL ix Sebjt: APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION 'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-02, A REQUEST TO WAXVE THE REQUIREMENT TO DEDICATE STREET RIGHT.-OF-WAY ON BANNING AVENUE. Backup MMdal AtUdW: (A Yes t No 00 Of-,,f"NA, Stetwont of luue, ReoomtYrintis'tion, Anstp!�Jundi2j Source, Alternstivot A;bony: SX&TEMENT 0? Ig UE: Transmitted for eonsider.3tion is an appeal to the Planning Com- mission' s denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-02, a request to waive the requirement to dedicate street right-of-Way on the north side of Banning Avenue, between Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River, The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission ' s denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-02. The Commission and rtaff also recommend that the City Council adopt the findings imposed by the Planning Commission on March 17, 1981. ANALYSIS: APPELLANT: Balboa Construction Co. , Inc . 20221 Praire St. Chatsworth, CA. 91311 AP g,MTs Balboa Construction Co. , Inc . 20221 Prairie St. Chatsworth, CA. 91311 TIQV: North of Banning Avenue, between Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River. R1C0UAfij1- Waiver of an Ordinance Coy-e requirement to dedicate street right--of-way on Banning Avenue. r PLANNINQ 0Q s IOx =19& k ON NOTION BY BANNISTER AND SECOND BY KENEI'ICK CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 81-02 WAS DENIED $Y THE FOLLOWING VOTE WITH THE , O FINDINGS:F i,LO�lIfll� PI C3S: �W o t� t . F Conditional Exception No. 81-02 Page Twd f t AYES: Bannister, Kenefick, Winchell, Schumacher NOES: None ABSENT: PorL•er, Bauer ABSTAIN: None 1=NGS ,ZOR,-,0 16 1. There are no exceptional circumstances that apply to this property that deprives the subject property of privileges enjoyed on other properties in the vicinity and under identical zoned classification because thee requirement to dedicate real. property F;:r streets and alleys is required d for all properties prior to issuance of building permits . 2. The approval of this conditional exception would be a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon :ether properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classifi- cation because the requirement to dedicate land for streets i and alleys appYies generally to all properties requesting permits for development. �I 3 . The approval of. Condit!.onal Exception No. 81-02 wouxd be materially detrimental to the public welfare because deft- cation of Banniny Avenue is necessary at this time to relieve traffic congestion in south Huntington Beach and west Costa Meuse . Conditional Exception No. 81-02 is a request by the applicant to weUvea the Ordinance code requirement set forth in Section 9730 . 2 to dedicate cteeegt right-of-way on the north side of Banning Ave. between Brookhurst Street and they Santa Ana Rf.ver. In Marca, 19eO, the applicant f." j.ad 2oiie Change No. 80-5, a request I to rezone the subJeact property from RA-0 to Ml. The intent and � purposes -)f the zone change request was to ultimately construct a mini-warehouae facility on the property owned by ::he County Sani- tation District. The applicant t e zone ebange request was altered by the Planning Commission to include the (Q) suffix limiting the use of the property to a self-storage facility. in Deeeembe r, , 1380, the applicant filed Administrative Review No. � 00-32, ' a. request to establish a mini--warehouse facility on the subject property* The request was subsequently approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments on December 10, 1980 with a general condition that s "Dedication of Banning Avenue and slope easement be accomplished prior to release of building peervits for the mini-warehouse facility." Bscauce of this condition and cotes requirement.. the applicant filers! Conditional Exception No. 81- 02 Kith the Depart-- +raant of DevalpMent Services ' i f• 1 Conditional Exception No. 81-02 Page Thkas Or( March 17, 1981, the planning Conuni,ssion reviewed Conditional Exception No. 81-C2 and after considerable discussion denied said application with findings as stated on page two of this report. In its analysis of the applicant ' s request to waive the code requirement to dedicate street right-of-way on the nori-h side of Banning Avenue, the Departint nt of Public Works stated that construction of a bridge connecting Banning Avenue to west Costa Mesa had been tentatively scheduled for fiscal year 82- 83. in addition, the staff and the Department of Public Works found that dedication of ;Banning Avenue was imperative to com- pleting the proposed bridge project within the timetable set by the County' s Environmental Management Agency and the City or Huntington Beach. When completed, the Panning Avenue bridge pro- ject will relieve *raf.fic congestion in the southeastern portion of Huntington Beac. and west Costa Mesa. The Departments of Development Services and Public Works also identified an additional traffic concerti for the propo6ad projects access to the mini-warehouse facility from Banning Avenue will be disrupted or eliminated due to bridge construction and street improvements. Analysis of the mini-warehouse site plan previously approved by the Board of Zoning Adjustments indicates that access to the facility is limited to the drive approach located on Banning Avenue. The Department of Public Works has also indicated that should the entrance to the mini-warehouse facility remain in its present location, and the proposed bridge is built, an unsafe traffic situation will occur for vehicles traveling west on Banning Avenues. vehicles traveling wost, across the bridge will not have sufficient time to slow dorm, or stop for vehicles turning into the mini-warehouse .facility. Bubsaquent to the Planning Commission action on Conditional Exception No. 81-02, the Attorney' s Office has forwarded an opinion regarding requirements of building permits and dedication for special districts. Based on the attached memo, the Sanitation District should have previously dedicated the Banning Street E.> right-of-way at the time the present expansion, was begun . w : On December 10, 1980, the Board of Zoning Adjustments adopted Negative Declaration No. 80-49 in conjunction with Administrative Review No. 80-32, having found that the proposed mini-warehouse facility will not have a significant adverse effect on the physical. environment. Conditional Exception No. 81-02 is categorically a; ans"t from CtM requirments, and no additional environmental revi" is necarsary tit this time. "C-oz tional Exception No, 81_02 Ptqe u►r E: RAINS 1�CL: Not applicable. Reverse the Planning Commission ' s action and approve Conditional Nxception No. 81--02 based on the following findings : j �MINU_IoUPAQy,,,,_„_L t 1. There are exceptional circumstances that apply to this property that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed on other properties it the vicin--ty and under identical zone classification. 2 . This conditional exception is necessary for the ,preservation and en joymort of the applicant' s property .rights. 3 . This conditional exception will not constitute a grant of special privilegE inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. f Sg2gQ8TIIIQ ..INFORMATION: k 1. Letter of Appeal from applicant 2. Site plan dated February 110 1981 3 . Staff Report dated March 17. , 1981 4 . Letter from George Tindall, C:Lty Engineer dated March 17, 1981 5. Memorandum Opinion from City Attorney' s Office dated lurch 27, 1981 Prepared by: s N. Ps�1::n, Director Department of Development Services { JWP:S!S s gc I i i 'm f 10 1 ip 150 • j ,,,� � rat!�a� -r-- 4 I ►nstruotion Coop Inca i; �j it iI March 25, 1981 4• Mayor Ruth Beiley t City of Huntington Beacha City via l l 430jP.O. Box 190 � 0v Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Mr. James W. patSn � City of Huntington Beach Flanning Commission P. q. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Conditional Exception No. 81-02 American Balboa Properties Dear Mayor Balley and Mr. Palin : I hereby am appealing Conditional Exception No . 81-02 which was disapproved by the skeletal Planning Commission that I appeared before on March 17, 1981 . Since I do not feel that I received a fair hearing by the non-attendant and anxious-to-leave four members of the Planning Commission, I think it unreasonable of you to charge additional fees to now bring this matter before the City Council . I should point out at this juncture that I am now twenty months into a sixty month lease and have cnnti nued to be waylaid by she Planning Commission fbr various rea.cons 'whicii are not appropriate to delineete in this letter at this time. I, therefore, request to be heard at the next City Council meeting. I further request that you arrange to have the City Attorney contact Mr, William Raff at my office on April 1 as there are Certain conflicts and other problems which should be resolved prior to my appearance . .1 X.IX RAW SMFT P.O. KW 977 • CMATSWORTH, CALIFORNIA 01311 • (213) Mq-.V61 �•"ham I „'. w 1 _ holoo r Sa i l ey 14r. Pa 1 i n March 25, 1981 Page 2 .. { I have, for the purpose of this application, however, enclosed the $150 that the Planning CommissiWan has additionally extracted from me, per their letter dated Itrch 190 which 1 received on March (just two days before the expiration of my right to appeal ) . Please contact me at My office and let me know your thoughts in regards to the Above nutters . i Very truly :vurs, r M ael Go and MG:cls cc : N.B. City Clerk w/check v� rl •M 1 1 ,J �1 ' 1 1. � yt.�IMww�a _�^--�_.�. ...�.. ._..._.r. _...._--.._.,.... �_ . _.. ..__ �.—__ _..r ._..�—��..+.�... 'Syr:. '• I�. � --�.-.�. 1� MOWN �r• r r ' r ,�• i � %% / 1 ! u it r ' I 1 y rA • +4v I � ♦1 r , Imo. I �1 HUNIINQTM BrACH .. PI.ANNINC DEP!►MI FNT (T i 3 SMIUM-r MAMO asW,ar ra! v P. 0. Box 1:� r 0 -., ^«•..,. Nurv�n&r Brach, CAN. 92W- ALL CIT93 tNIW&Mt#^WW. •�•�' • •••"+`�•�"• K4Mw w lMM h� Ir- I ,,,,,•ar/ 1 •Wbyl MAR Nd ,r wwr N ter,«•- ..,,.,�,w ., Its.•,I►+rnwiv A%rrs Q WACH_ •�,■r� NNW I& Ilr ' w y, %ram � a SIMTA AM '�',;,� .�i �■,d rr�A �k\r+.Warr�,� � .�r+iw��M/wi 0 I c �� l 10kid LAW � w rr i Z i I —w... �iE 141 A-.; kA y 1 +,•Arr;' ��� I•''.� IA 11,ter � �' '�1 �' r r ��� > 4 .�Jl�un'.il�r,�.Ay:�'Ltil�l�'sate:�J,.,i,.1.«S';.�W,.�.r'i��.:,1 '.,•� rl,, ' .��.._ -- � 1 r�i'�Ar ley � • •�i�. .i rl R..'• rJ �•41 OIL OqOP7 mail J, Ir It Aft dW ki NN �Y�f 1 ,11 Y i 1 ♦ 1 i� 1 +1 11 / 11 I 11 1� 11 r , 1 1 11 1 \� i �'ter, �•' �'� / 'i 'C _tom• �tj �� ti 11 +� 11 ` PI.Al�NF1N�lht T("AMMT N P. 0. 90A 190 /n+ sYlwlrr. IYIr AM/MI•nM •IMb Mali Q 1 � A~ AW On%~ OWN— ' 1 IW.'!1���� y R ) {7°�'� ��{y��•�/I�1�• +� Mlr�n rl/r �r/ � .�1f�'� r ,� 1 !• � ..�i���v.r'r•,•���'�5' .(��F��1• i�r�';i iYR��_� r���Yl/,l�.Mt}" V. �;• .• - -�.�.� 1 ' P 41untington beach devalepment services departtnen% STA f f REPORT �._... TO: planning commission FROM Development Services DATE: March 17 , 1981 C�7ND I T IONAL EXCEPTION NO.g 11- 0 2 ' ll�;.A : Mierican Balboa Properties DATE APPL.T.C`A`I'TON F�CG'EPTEf) : lay : Balboa (,'onstruction Co . March 5 , 1981r 20221 Prairie St . Chatsworth, ca . 91311. t4ANDATORY PROCESSING - DATE : May 5 , 1981 HEQ,UI&'V: Waiver of the requirement to dedicate street right- ZONING; : (Q) Nil of--way on Banning Ave. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: LGCA7'to: Located north of Banr.tng Ave . Public Use : Institutional between Brookburst St. and the Santa Ana River. EXISTIN(; USE: Vacant ACBEAC�E, + 7 Acres 1 . 0- REgQ M.EN)ATION: The staff recommends denial of Conditional Exception No. 91-02 baser on the findings as outlined in Section 7 . 0 of this report . j 2A 0 . GOBA,A.L NNWATION; Conditional Exception No. 61-02 is a request by the applicant to waive the ordinance; code requirement set forth in Section 9730 . 2 to dedicate i� streee right-of-way at Banning Avenue between Prookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River . In March, 1980, the applicant filed 'Lone change No. 80-5 , a request to rezone the subject property from FAA-0 to M1 . The intent and purpose of the lone change request yeas to ultimately construct h mini-warehouse facility on the property owned by the County Sanitation District. i The zone change request was altered by staff and the Conunission to include the (Q) suffix limiting the use of the property to a self storage facility. n CE al..02 Page Two In December, 1980, the applicant filed Adminlstra'-ikre Review NO. 80-321 a request to establish a mini.--warchou;e facility on t:}ic subject property. This item was subsequently approved. by the Board of 'Zoning ?Adjustments on Docember 1.0, 1980 with a general condition that: "Dedication of Banninq Avenur, and slope easement_ b(: accomplished prior to release of building permits for the mini warehouse facility. " Because of this condition, the: applicant has .fixed Conditional Exception No. 81-02 with the Department of Development Services , 3 . 0 SUMMARY OF TSSUES: The majc- issues of concern regarding Conditional Exception No . 81 . 02 are as follows : : 1 . Are there exceptional circumstances that apply to this property that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed or other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification? 2. Will this conditional exception constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicirity and under identical zone classification? 3. Ts this conditional exception necessary for the. preservation and enjoyment of one or more substantial property rights? 4. Will this condit.l.onal exception be materially detrimental to the ;public welfare or injurio,,s to property in the same zone classifi- cation7 4 00 EhV 1R�_AENTAL STATUS: On December 10, 1980, the Board of Zoning pdJu8tments adopted Negative Declaration No. 80-49 in conjunction with Administrative Review No . 80-32, having found that the proposed mini_ warehouse facility will not have a signific-ant adverse affect on the physical. environment . 5 . 0URROUIIDINg_AND USE, ZONING. ANC- c;ENGF�AL PLAN T�ESIGNATION: The subject site is currently vacant with the exception of a concrete building owned by the ,Sanitation District. The site is zoned (0) M1 and is designated on the General Plan as Public use; Institutional. Property to the north of the subject site is zoned R-•3 and is developed Multiple-Farnily Residential . This property is designated as Medium Density Residential on the General plan. The property to the south of the subject site is presently vacant and is zonea Mi . Thls property it. designated as Public Use; Institutional on the General plan. Property across grookhurst Street to the west of the subject site is zoned R-1 and is developed with single family residences. This property is designated on the General Plan as Low tensity Residential . L rr` • FALV14 • Conditional Excopti.on No. 81--02 Page Three I SLY S I S: i Conditional Exception No. 81-02 is a request by the applicant to waive Section 9730 . 2 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance a (.oche to dedicate shr. eet right-of-way -,n Palming AVenuP_ At the December 10, 1980 Board of zoning Adjustments meelting, the fallowing general conditions were impos-ad on the applicant as part of the entitlement for Administrative Review No . 80--32 . Admi.r►J st.rati.ve Review No. 804-32 was a request by the- applicant to establish a mini.-- warehouse facility on thy: subject property. GENERAL CONDITIONS : L. The propo_tied use will comely with all. conditions of Zone Change 80-5 and all provisions of Article 964 A ( Qualified Classification) of the Iiuntington Beach Ordinance Code . 2 . Dedication of Banning and slope r-eisement prior to building permits . 3 . Conditions of Apprcvc-0. to include, all mitigating measures as set out ,in Negative I)eclaration ,to . 80--20 and Negative Declaration No . 80- 4 9 . 4 . Drive approach to be constructed to tLepa.rtment of Public Works Standard Flan 212 A & B . 5. Applicant shall comply with all applicable Uniform Fire Code standards. . 6 . Reviser] pll:in to be suLmitted if improvements or dedication adversely effect building setbacks or access to property . i 7 . If lighting is .included in the parking lot , energy efficient lamps shall be used (e . g. high pressure, so:iJ.urn vapri,r, metal halide) . All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties . The Department of Public works has state) that construction of a bridge connecting Banning Avenue to west Costa Mesa has been tentatively scheduled for late 1982 or early 1983 depending on funding. Becausa of this major project, General Conditions No. 2 and 6 were imposed by the Board of Zoning .Adjustments. The conditioning of Administrative Review No. 80--32 was intended for clarification only, .and Condition No. 2 pertaining to dedication of. Banning Avenue is found in Section 9730.2 of U., Ordi- nance Code. it is also the opinion of staff and the public Works Depart- ` meant that dedication of Banning Avenues at this time is imperative to com- pleting the Banning Avenue Bridges project which will relieve traffic !; congestion in the southeastern portion of Huntington Beach and west Costa Mesa. t, dJ: Conditional Exception No.. 81 -02 Wage Four. If dedication of Banning Avenue is not required by the city at this time . future improvement- of Banning Avenue would he the responsibility Of the City. If this ituQ tion is allowed to ccr_ur. , re,imburserrient of funds invested by the City would only be recovered at such time the property owner developed the properties abut�jng Dnnni.ng Avenue . In addition, access to tho rn.ini-warehouse facility from Banning Avenue will. be disrupted or eliminated clue to hridge, construction and street improvements . Analysis of: the mini-warehouse site plan previously approved 1)y t.ho board of Zoning Adjustments indicates that. access to the faoii.ity is limited t-) the drive approach located can Fsanning Avenue. The Public Works Department has also indicated that should the entrance to the mini.-warehouse facility rr.:main in its present location and the bridge be built , an un:►34f'e traffic situation w&ll occur for vehicles traveling west on Banning Avenue . Vehicles traveling west , across the bridge will not: have suff:iei_erir time to slow down, or stop for vehicles turning into the mini-warchouse facility. 7. 0 RECO E,NDAT1Q'N: The staff recommends denial of Conditional Exceptior No. 81-02 based oil the following findings : f.INDINGS FOR DENTAL: 1 . There are iio exceptional circumstances that apply to this property that deprive the subject property of privileges enjoyed on other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone c:lassif:ir_a�ion � because the requirement to dedicate real property for streets and alleys is required for all properties prior to issuance of building Permits . 2. The approval of this conditional exception is a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification because the requirement to dedicate lard for streets and alleys applies generally to all p.rororties requesting permits for development. 3 . The approval of Conditional Exception No. 81,-02 would be materially detrimental to the public welfare hecause dedication of Fanning Avenue is necessary at this time to relieve traffic congestion in south Huntington Beach and West Costa Mesa . MS:gc �C i s 1� site plan 2.. Area Map N, t ills t�i iq I f R I off R t ' J Ri I t It�� tt • �] o = FF ++ } 0 ��33 E ( 4 RI M 71 Ri CC;F E 1-1 1 " �1 I r-- 11 Vi�. I vil RI i i M I 4 CF—R p ---- If : 1 1 /110, RI i� o. RI ; 4{ ' RI"' RtRt . �c. cm R1 Ri [P.��j,�"f�`• RI r�`�,/� •I f k \ v_, Rid, t- ' ' E (!`l.'•DI LIMITED USE DISTMT CESI -^ r Mvx T":she§L Cn HUNTINGTON UACH pLANMINis 01VISION 1 r M ! • 1 C1TV OF HUNTINGTON OFEACH IIdTER.DEPARTMENT COMMUNICAFIVN , From Cr�rce Tindall �� Try Jags ��alin � � Uirector, Develcixwn;t Servicos City Engineer !-,Ile March t7 1981 ' Subject � N,,r !3t-•Q2; Mini--st�oragc� Facility ' I?roo)diurst St. at Danning Ave. T!v-4 P.lann.hig Con-mussioN at their 3/.1.7/81 meetinci will be consi.der.inq a request to waive 0 Ly O di nance rcquirements for th-, dedication of Banning Avenue in conjunction with approval of a pmNased mini-storage yard on B.r-ooRhurst Street. This office sees twv major probl4ro with the proposed plaza for the subject mini-storage deti eloprent. First, Banning Avenue is an nVortant cast-west arterial highway on both tlye C.i.ty's and Cbunty's Master Plan of Arterial Highways. A Comt:y Ara Hoc C=rdttee reviewing bridge crossings of t-bo_ Santa Ana River has recammnded to E.M.A, that the Banning Avenue crossing of the Santa Ana Riviet be g:.ven top priority. As a result, E.M.A. is proposing to sctwdule the Lonstx-ucticn of the banning Bridge within P.Y. 82-83. Tbere- fore, the waiver of ordinance dedication requircrents relative to Damning :Avenu,a is not recxxmwxx ad. The se�,orxl concern this office has with thi., proposed developmcnL plan is the location of the driveway. The dri.vtiway is proposed tc be sei,vioed cuff Banning Avenue, which will create traffic safety problaro resulting from l imit ad visibility flue to the :u.tt:ure bridge grossing of the ,Santa Ana River. 7be best location for U.a driveway would be can Brookhurst Street. Tte developer of this project: has indicated in several meetings with members of the City staff oveL' the past F, months that the sanitation District (propexty owner) has imposed various te::hnical reyui;:ements which make it inpossible to ccniply with City CWe requiretients rr,l.a' ►u tr) dedication of 1aming Avenue a:xl driveway access on Broaokhurs t C. -et. Alt hough the Saiii.tation district's requi.rernents make it difficult t) develop tl•ie orcposed site, I believe the City Ordinance requiremnts zhould still be tnet. There- fore, I recar<merrd that the Planning Camdssion sup Ex7rt the staff y s rc4_xnmezx3a- tion to deny CE No. 81.-02. GLT:Jy h rpP i DF W. Jt ! CITY OF HUNTNNG11014 BEACH MAR 3 i 99 i { INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION P. 0• f3ox � R� ' ►MwuN� �i�r�+c„ Ilur,!it��;�n Rt;�rt`, i, ,,;,•.iB To ,7arne,y W . Pal.in , Director From (1a111 fill t, toti Devel.opmettt: Scr•vi(:e.s CJ.tu Ai: 'Gorney Subj t SF�orir.tl lei st rtct: tttt.'f �,on f.,�i; l'. me March 27 , lyt�l Ordinanoe NEWORANDUM OPINION STATEMENT OF FACTS : An applicant ror, a rnin:t-storage fatal. t,v ( CE? 140 . 81-02 ) is a Lessee of Orange :'ount;y Sanitation District (p-roporty owner in fee) . The rppl.icart/developer states that: the Orange Country Sanitation District hars imposed variuu; technical requirements which it says cannot be renonciled wA th city rode requirements for the dedication of Banning Avenue . The Orange County Sani- tation District is a special district which has a plant within the city . For a number of years County and City have proposed � g an arterial hi�;hwa„, , Banning Avenue , to add an additional river crossing between Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa. When the Sanitation District expar;ded its existinlo; facilit,i.es , it made no requests to the city Cor building permits . Had the Sanita- tion District sought the issuance of building permits the City could have had an opportunity to require that; this, segment of land ( Banning Avenue ) be dedicated to the city . � Apparently Orange County Sanitation District is denying the city a right-of-way easement for extension of Banning Avenue . The city would like to require the sanitation district; to dedicate an easement frr this purpose . The Planning, Commission raised the quest ion whether ;special districts are subject to the city ' s zoning ordinen.nces QUESTION : Are special districts subject to zoning and buildiTtr; rodeo of the city prior to the District ' s expansions and/or initial con- st l-ucti.ons of f aci litiet; -Located within the city ? ANSWER : Yes . r' or memo,vandum Opin.lon, ve spoc.ial. v).istilict.c.i Page 2 and Zoning Ordlncarwe,,; March 27 , 1987. ANALY31S : Orange Comity S)anitation Dintrict. 14o . .1.1 IS) itm Inofl-umenta.11ty of the State , It is fot,med purrmaril; fx) Stnto sitatuto : County Sanitation District Act.- , Health and Safety Code § 11700 . This issue is cmitisol.lerj by "RegulationIL O ' Le"o al A g,e-n c i by Counties and Citii: s , 11 Government Cride § 53090 ., (-,L seq . (ArtIvIe 5 provides t-.hnt; , "Each locai afrency shall oomply with A'all applicable buLldlnr, nrd]-manecE3 �Ind zon.tntr ordinances of the County or City in which the territory of the local agency is situated . . . 11. ) Government Code §53091 . CONCLUSION: Orange County Sanitat:16n DIstri,�t No . 1. 1 Is, sub,; ect to the City ts building and zoning ordiminnes . Government Code §53091 - GAIL HUTTON City Attorney a b- b ccyc- mber, of the PlannJnp Commission i � y 1 q' 11 Publish April 9, 1981 M NOTICE Of' PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO 'P:E PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL DF CE #81-02 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Huntington Beach, at thle hour of �2 :30_ P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possible on . �� the h day of APri1 _ 19 8�• for the purpose of considering an appeal to the Planning Conmission's denial of Conditional Exception Not 81-02, a request to waive the requirement to dedicate street right-of-way on Funning Avenue as required by Section 9730.2 of the Hunti ngton j Beach Ordinance Code. The subject property is toned (Q) M! (Qualified Light Industrial District) and is located an the north side of Banning Avenue, between Brookhurst Street and the Santa Anr River. A legal description is on file in the Department of development Services Mice. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against said appeal Further inforntion may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk. 20C' Street, Huntington Beach, California. 92648 - (714) 536-5227 DATED ril 3g 1901 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH By: Alicia M. Wontworth City Clark s a Y Publish April 9, 1981 NOTICE OF PtlBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO THE PLANNING C"ISr ION'S DENIAL OF CE #81-02 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach, in the. Council Chamber of the Civic Center, Hunting�c,: Beach, at the hour of 7: 30 , P.M. , or as soon thereafter as possibl a on * — MOMAY I the .�h - day of April , 1981 ._ for the pwrpoxe of considering an appeal to tha Planning Comais*ion's denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-02, a request to waive the requirement to dedicate street right-of-way on Banning Avenue as required by Section 9730, 2 of the Huntington i Beach Ordinance Code. The subject property ii� zoned (Q) M1 (Qualified Light � i Industrial District) and is located on the north side of Banning Avenue, between Brookhurst Street and the Santa Ana River. A ;e9al description is on file- i,I the Departnv.Ant of Development Services Office. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their up•inioos for or against said appeal Further infamStion my be obtained from the Office of the City �.lerk, M Main Ur"to NantingtW Bch, California. 92548 (714) 535-5227 DATED. ri1 3 1 1 CITY OOFHUNTINGTON BEACH ���i�ri�Yl�arlw�.Mr�nw. Alic 8y. �Git,�iClerkld�ntaworth r 1 � p .. Hubl ist-led in li . '! . ,J)onde nt Nees Njars:h 5 , 1981 LXGIVEK E a +V 'YC$ OFEARIN,3 r ONUITIONAL V0. 61--02 NOTICE IS HERSB that a public heari,ncl will be held by the City of the City of Hu'l«i ngton Beach , California, for the urposa of considering #ionftl '"•n��•�n No. 81-02, a request to wapve the requireuiPnt to dedicate street ' ex& right of way4as req!Yreel by Section 9730 . 2 of the Hunting ton reach ordinance Code. The subjeac* property is zoned (, ) M (Qualified Tight Industrial district) and is located a �#s+ �•!«�o•'� AWL .j hW 11400 A legal description is on file in the Department Cf Development Services office . i Y Said hearing will be held at the hour of � � P.H. , on in the CounCil. Chambers Building of the CivLc Center , 2000 Main Street, Houtington Beach, california. All interested persons are invited -to attend said hearing and express their opinions for oM against the proposed Conditional Exception No. HI-02 Furthar information may be obtained from the City Planning Ueapartment. Telephone No., (714) 536- 5271 DAT= this SLh____� day of Mareki, 1981 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Jarr,as W. Palin By Seycretu ry sti; r •;�-. t� - P-.. r'. �. �'. ti - 1 Y � �'i. � � .��� r� ,l�•. s r � � - �Y{y� In 1 �{ �, ,�� - + r•► �' .. ,� { •w : �� r; V•-'�.. `` --� '�, ,. ;i' �: r c ff�. t �.�� �� • :.. a .., � � :r - i � _t ��f4� - �•' +;�, ;� _ � .,t ; A' � 1�, R, �*/ i 3 _. � � - � r � - M / �. � ' � r�.1 4 A. 4 .. _ , .�� a t � t• �1 - � • � � . a r 1 A a+ � � ,� �� �•��, •,r ;r �,;� t � �, . � ��. _ . � .0�.. • �( 11f31771. -t, ,. ,� _ 1;.., _ � :r' rat+. �� #� ., .t �.:r'.'t qr i � }, � ,f' 'a' 1 :�1. ,� - r f �_�- �,. �r' . l'.iri t• JR �. j ' •�r�.. � ' ' i ' J��:.. _ `,t; r } i t. �:. .. .�� � . •��� � �.. �� ' ;� .M , N � �' ,�♦ .! I . 3-3-41 Pop 2 of 2 14qOb/- 149-OWIL3 149--06 5-03 i'bald W. Arty #gum I1. akt cmw a. >A41dq 21$72 Law 21811 Lang kwltU , CK On" , CR 92646 HMtU SMK*►, CA 926405 1 49-t " 149-►065-% 7/�lbmr : A. � ;. 0913,1 Jt' M 8. i Lam lam 21621 �1ta�vi 1 Uvw t raw '�; � CA 92646 R=tln7tm MMocho CR 92646 '149-064-06 •: 149k-%5p-07 JL 2U92 I tumtwiL7.1, psi If Lftw �l�gt�l�f ' Q9►. _t: f 6 Burch, CA 92646 1,49-064-07 A • 149a6�+06 � Jt� t �1 X. .11tlmm L. z 111.902 . Zom P.O. BoK 5217 � i;wnti�rghoA , cal, 2b4fi �g111d r CR 9?."6 Bach, C% 9216 JJI 149-06" 1+19-06-r"-09 I ' lid J, tw ICs, � k P. MrLimg 21912 rl U r 9e L 21061 --mmandmd Lw i i hmtblgt n somm, CR 9x" CR 92646 awtim0mBar tr, Ch 92646 149-064-M 16�-Od�i-i11 149-��10 i �ti,lliaat D. 14attka f Ovid P. Tm=w Jercy it'd 1vtt Z1681 �dtx? rye 2�u�rtt �y#�sr 8�t�1't, Q► � i ir�lal�! �1'.ti, Ch 92646E�uttttit�gtr�ei �, Ch 92646 I t49-064-10 1i 4f5 2 144-WS-11 ? i raresd J. momy KtdwA1 J. llrl lttb RidNard T. Do Nike ' 21932 317a 2101 a Late lkmtimjtm e■d. Ck S" ar i , Ch 9 "n SUK&t ok 99646 149-064-u 149-066+ 01 ' 1 S. 1 ohm= flem D. lkraa 94 ! 217K d ran 49U oaermet t larlva dftod4 Ch 926U 901*0 Ch 926" A*-OW22 U.0-069-44 '19l� d�nd 'l J � LOW fdt��le� �� � 11 �+►, C# 9 , ` ftue ` r i a • n � , R P ar go IlA rah 3 r 1901 Olaf 2 Arnow BoIbm ptomr " 149°-LL3-ft 149-34)-12 __tln IM. now" Xam" Tim 00 0321 Prpiris Ift W 9 CCMm� - mot Rive 99761 MWinda Circle b4t»noortt, C h 913U jOVWA D■edh• CIL 92646 !#andxgtoo Hmc.h, CIS 92,;46 Ir ft Li9-113 149-Q63- 1 i Ell 4 -Avom A. mwUn Gerald G. Wmw .. , unt In VkIlWr Ch 9270 =_ %mmomploc"tDriver 21901. aow4h,'"m Lam i t�q Smaho C h 92648 t twi 109scho C3k 92646 E 219u - M 6 d Lum cx train V&11W, � ' �s C3► 92646 B illin � BeaCho CA 92646 j 49-1.11--18 149-063423 Ian R. Itb0m jaw a• RUMUMMON. Cani.M S. 7Asma 18 5th Stxvnt X Maw 21921 SumandM Yam 11mitington beac . CR 92ck,$ Nwho C h 92646 &mtiigt= bukcIti, CA 92646 i 19-11 19 31� -].13-q3 149-063-•24 ;wrge W. S1tokB ljmt,#k>l axmfh G. Sir* 17.0 llth 6 C/o 1" T. Cb m 21952 IN it arrhtoersM L�►. 'Iuilt:.ingtm Busch, CA 926U M2 cbwy Ome Drive L`Imti"oa's Moc h r C`A 92646 fib+ [t 92646 14 9-111-20 149-113-06 149-%3-25 ,Texam M . Him moire M. Wmfarrd 1110. am 545Jim * omym � dri%m 21942 Hax!a 1-IV am* Lam m[booed, CA 91770 g04 roqRoo CA 92646 • CA 92646 149-12 .01 149-2?3.-03 149-064--01 l rt W. waraw am 021 gal » Ltd. Pwber B. mop lin 990111 V +t Drive � am* ait»im 9932 ft4co ms Lean Itr�ntirr76Cxt , 926! '...Mrt, C n bumhe L71 92045 1+19-1 3 149-321-15 149-064--02 D. 8d m A. Ciemloi C�eerid P. i t ve t # CL 9 6 l q m Ms C R 9�Y�660 2 C� 93"6 J 149-1.1 3 149-341,-11 149-M 03 f t moot CR paw",_ 9mmA, Ca► 92646 8mmob, CA 926" J%A ` ILd r pb. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC N %,. ,PION'5D9NIAL o APFkAL TO THE ►LANNINtif OOMIdIMB10N'*Ili.AIAL APPEAL to THE PLANNING CM . OF CE NO.81-02 Op CE NO.81.02 NOTICE 1E HIM lWY GIVEN that a pulft hwW4 will be NOTICE it HERRNY GIVEN that a p##1#lls hoerinll will be ,r Raid ky ilia My ON Uri;! a 1 the C1ey d"wain■son a*"*. Mid by the City caunell of the City of Huntw Own oMih. t' tint due Cpttresil gwrA R►of the Clvhr C~,ffuM neon In tM Gournll*wrttber of the Civia Center,HuMirgton faaai,r at*6 how of 7130 pin.,or as soar Ihereaftsr es Basalt,at tits haw of 7:30 P.M.,or se a"ther"Itar as ' >' M■alMiu On Ms clay sire Wh day of April, 1901 for the possible on Monday the ZOth clay of Alril,18B1 for the N W&POaa df OOndiW**sn oppaa)to the Plmek Cosuaisbn's , purpew of wrridsrk�y an apyrsal to the MannkM CawirMlieaMrn• dessiM of GCntslKltrrtM Elm@0Isn No.81-ft,s re"vm to woke desist of Conditional ►?xeoeptian No.1111A2,a rquest to WkV ngtrlretsese�t q 4edlaata atreN rl�rtofawoy oar AsntNrw the rqubsntent to dadm"street right-eMeay on 1110"he e' , Arwrtio y re,ttlresl by Seotlolt B7 J,=of the Ntt#tt(rtMan Avanua as required by Session 6730J of the MMnik4ton Neagh 0millinnse Owls.T'ha WAIM pwperty is WOW (fa) Sarah Ordinance Ooda,the a kisat propvty is eened(0) frtAl 10"w1w 1,1p d I adYMriat Maw WA Is loertow on the MI(f wIffiad Indumia) 01mist) and k k► dd on the nerds ddo ad Illwat♦ity Avenue,to tivow Broelthwst Berm and north site of Bennirrg Avenue,between Br►,okitw'-t Street and t 1 ti the Banta Ane RNutr. the Santa Ana Inver. rr A►hMsl deaeription k on file In the Depentrowd of Devolopmsnt A IMI dowription lean file in tyre Department of L VOlopmNrt w *, Servioea OWisa, Sarviae Off iw. MI intereartad paroom we hrvitet:to attend acid hewing and All Inionseted persona are invited to attend sold Marino said express their opininn a for or spinet said appeal. express their opiniora for or against said appeal. Further infatmothm mmy be obtained from the Off We of tb,% Ftwthor Infohrtetion may be obtained from the Offlor of the M„ City Clerk.2000 Maier Street,Huntington Beath,CA 9211101111 City Claris,2000 Main Stair, Huntington IS",CA 1112MIS 17141 59114112T7 (71 d) 63"227 �r Detr ' April 9, 1981 VMod:April 3.1901 ' JTV OF HUNTIRO FON BEACH CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 9y: ALICIA M.WENTWORTH BY: ALICIA M.WENTWORTH k City Clark City Clark I Pub.April8, 1t:1B1 Pub,Atxii 9, IS$I Hunt.Beach Ind. Hunt,B#Wch Ind. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR114G N01ME OF PUBLIC HEARING APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL APPEAL TO THE PLANNING COMMISCION'S DENIAL OF CE NO.8142 OF CE NO.81-02 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public tfaarirg will be NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public heanatip will be Mid by the City Council of the City of Irvnthptoh Beach, hold by the My Council of the City of Huntington Such, In the Council Chamber of the Citric Cent or, ifuntington in the Council C harrrbar of the Chin Carter,ffuntlnoon Beath,at the how of 7:30 p.m.,oe as soon thereafter Ps Beath.at the hour of 7:30 p.m.,or as noon thereefter as possible on Monetary Ow ZMh flay of April,19 d1 for the possible on Monday the 20th day of April, 1861 for the purporw of oonridsring an appeal to the,Planning Commission's purpum of oonsidarieV an appeal to the Plennirrq Cummkitior's denial of Cooditionrel Exalptlnn No.0142,d#quest to waive denial of Conditional kxoeption No.81-02,a reggsot to waive the raquirenlant to dediesd#street riglttof-ml,an Raining the requirement to dadkote street ripWof-way on Banning Avenue w required by Bection 97302 of the I Iurntington Avenue ai required by tisction 9730.2 of the Huntington 4esah OnNnowte(bode.The subiaot property Is Zoned 10) peach Ordiarin Code.The taybieet property Is waned(0) W(011211 isq Light Indrtstriel Dint-kt)and M I xWW on the MI Xivalifiad Light Industriel Dhtrlat) aro Is basted on the 6 north We of BanaNirrp Avatnw,hetwearn BroolrhwsE Stoat and month side of Banning Avenue,betty om Brookhurst Street and due l nla Ana IMrar, the Santis Ans Rlnsr. A keSsl daoi 1pplen Is on file In the C.pertmant of 09pelopmrit A lagsl dMariptian Is on file in the Oepa►t.nentt of Oevolop"unt yr, >Nrvimea Offom Services Offise. w . AN iMm Mild peeves am awned t*areal ON Mnhq end All intsrostad p u carte era invited to attend aaW howfng end erlpreea thek apiaie ft farr eir -1p Mot mW appeal• exgrsw that spinians fw ter spinet mid appeal. IpurtMr Mtiorerartlost stay be obtained fronn the Off:.,e of the Forfar information m"be obtai#t+ad from the Office-3f the k my park,=0 Main Street.H WImApti Beadn,CA 92M Sri Clerk.200b M■In Street,Nw Mn&m Baeoft,I:A�,i4S y j (7141 G354W (714)6368x27 " Datarl: April A IM dated:April 3, 1881 CITY Of HUNT UGTON BEACH City OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .1 BY; ALICIA M.WORTWM011TH BY: ALICIA M.WENT"TH city CMrk City I"wk Pub.April 0.1 W1 Pub.April 9,1961 Hine. Deseh Ned. Hunt.Basch Ind. KV',p4I A .r r '/1 Yyy ♦ r .y1. r// r rr r r nw on ors $now y. " March 25, 1981 Co Mi or Guth Dailey �t,11��•,�,, .' City of Huntington Beach ri ty Mail �A P.O. Box 190 p, 0. x90 0&60 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 %00 Mr. James W. Palin City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 i Re: Conditional Exception No . 81 -02 American Balboa Properties Gear Mayer Bailey and Mr. Pal in : I hereby am appealing Conditional Exception No . 81 -02 which was disa7proved by the "skeletal " Planning Commission that I appeared j before on March 17, 1981 . Since I do not feel that I received a fair hearing by the non -attendant and anxious-to-] Pave four members of the Planning Commission , I think. it unreasonable of you to charge additional fees to now bring this mattor before the City Council , I should point out at this ,puncture that I am now twenty months into a sixty month lease and have continued to be waylaid l:y the Planning Commission fbr various reasons which are not appropriate to delineate in this letter at this time. 1, therefore, request to be heard at the next City Council meeting. I further request that you arrange -to have the City Attorney Contact Mr. William ftff at any office on April 1 as these are certain conflicts and other problems which should be resolved prior to ray appearance. 20221 ML4= il'OEFT P.O. sax 0*17 + CN.+ATSWCWTH. CAUFORNIA FIN • (21j) 349-)ill t. . ' rr 5. . wrlr y'11 , d i } , r Mayor Day i l ey Mr. Pali n March 25, 1981 Page 1 Y 1J I t� I I have, for the Purpose of this application, however, enclosed � the $150 that the planning Commission has Additionally extracted from me, per their letter dated March 19, which I received on March 25 (just two days before the expiration my r•ignt to G f, appeal ). Please contact me at my office and let me know your thoughts in regards to the above ratters. Very truly yours , Mi ael Goland MG:ClS cc; H.B . City Clerk w/check w, { M I •iJ "I r k, --ION BEACH C V OF HUNTINLO 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFOANIA 92W OFFICE OF THE CITY CURK r. ,. Apri l 28 1981 Balboa Construction Co, Inc. 20221 P r•a i re Strut Chatsworth, CA 91311 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, April 20, 1961 , continued the public hearing on your appeal to the Planning Commission 's denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-02 to they May 4, 1961 meeting. If yoc have any questions, please contact the Department of Devei - opnient Services - 536-5271 . Alicla M. Wentworth City Clerk j AMW:I'll cc: Jim Palin, Director of Development Services ' I • i yN � CITY OF MUNTINLO I BEACH 2O00 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 9260 00FICR OF THE CITY CLERK t k' r,4 �r c, Mity 6y 1981 r` Ia 1 boa Construction ^,ompa ny, Inc . ?0221 pratre Street Chatsworth, California 91311 The City Council of the City of Huntingto-, Beach at its regular a"ting held Monday, May a, 1981 , approved with amended conditions, your appeal to the Planning Commission' s denial of CE #81-02, Please contact the Departimnt of Development Services for further informtion - 636-5271 . Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMM:bt I CC: Jim Palin. Director of Deveioprwt Services r ' i4f n l,l +y. I d' 4 ' a ny aai- ••silk... . ....na. .__ _�_ _� 1 1 �-- INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION 1NAYTMQ• M�fM To Charles It. Thompson From Jdaes W. Pali.n , Director City Administrator Development Services Subject SUPpY.UMUTAL INFORMATION: Date April 29, .1981 APPZM, ON C.E. 81--020 XCENDA ITEM D1 (a Attached is the chronology of the applications which have been filed by Balboa Construction Company in conjunction with their efforts to have a mini-storage facility approved on property at Banning Avenue and Brookhurst Street, starting with Zone Change 80-5 on February 1, 1980 to the present date of consideration by the Council of their appeal to the V.anning Commission' s denial of Conditlon+al Exception 81--02 . This information was requested by the City Council becasise the appli- cant in this case had alleged that there had been numerous undue delays by the City in his seeking approval of this facility . The Council also requested) that information be provided on whither the. applicant had sufficient authority to be. processing through this present condi- tional exception application . The Department of Development Services has reviewed the lease agreement and, based upon such agreement, it in our understanding that he is not only authorized to do this but in charged to comply with all regulations and ordinances of the City of Huntington Beaoh. The Council ' s attention should be dir+e►oted to Items 6 and 12 in the attached lease agreement, as they appear to creat.c a Catch 22 .for the applicant in that 6 does not: n1low any change or alteration to the property yet 12 requires of they comply with all. municipal ordinances and regul e tions . P:df tachments : Chronology of Actions Lease Agreement T 19AIV1 0 APR 2 91N1 1Y OF HUNMGTON BEAW ADMIN RATINE OFnCE INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION foi. .r.nw uv�� To John Vogelsang From Pat enter Deputy Director Development: Services Suhject MjNI-STORAGE FACILITY OOta April 22 , 1981 BANNING Z BROOKHURST ZC 80-51 AR 60-32 , CE 81-2 The f.olio4ing is a chronological listing of filings , meetings and action daces regarding subject facility . j Februaar 11 1980 w Request filed for zone r_nankfe I Applicant : Balboa Edon Properties Mr . Mike Goland February 22 , 1980 - Legii 't filing date - per notice to applicant. from James Barnes , Associate Planner March 3, 1980 "Development review requese' received from Tindall - no mention of street (Banning) dedication or physical improvements March 61 1980 - Notice of public hearing .nailed for Zone Case 80-5 applicant notified also. Public hearing scheduled for March 18 , 1980 Match 18 , 1900 - Public nearing helu by Planning Commission on Zone Change No . 80-5 Vlai rh 20 , 1980 -- Applicant (Balboa Edon Properties) mailed "Notice of Action" stating that Planning Commission recommended a conditional approval of Zone Change No . 80-5 April 1 , 1980 - Notice of Public Hearing mailed tr applicant (Balh*a) stating that a public hea=ing on Zone Change No. 80--5 will be held by City Council. April 21, 1980 . April 21, 1980 - City Council approved Zone Change No . 80-5 and approved introduction of Ordinance No. 2428 . Mini-storage facility April 22, 1991 .. Page 2 `. May 5 , 1980 City Council final adoption of Zone Change No. 80-5 to take effect in thirty ( 30) days . Condition attached to zone was : "that subject site shall. be developed as a self- storage facility or county sanitation distr•iot facility" . July 17, 1980 - Applicant (Balboa Construction Co. , Inc . ) filed an 10ministrative Review application for the establishment of a "mini-warehouse facility" to be heard by Board of Zoning Adjustments .7ul.y 22, 1980 - Application (Administrative Review No . 80-32) officially accepted for processing this date. July 310 198.0 - Meeting held with Balboa Construction c.o . and representatives from Fire, Public Works and Development Set-vices staff memberr� . .Items discussed primarily were emergency access, sewer and water tine extensions to serve subject property. Numerous other meetings and phone conversations took place between applicants representative and staff in order to resolve concerns and expense in extending water, &ewer , and secondary vehicular access to the facility , November 4 . 1980 - "Notice of Application Status " was mailed to applicant (Balboa Con.,-truction Co . , Inc. ) notifiying thRm that hearing date for their Administrative Review No. 80-32 was set for November 12, L980 . !:nv,amber 12, 1980 AdrriniRtrative Review No. 80-32 was discu$sed at some length with the applicant 's representative Mr . 0choneville . Dincussion primarily was dedi- cation and physical improv9ment of Banning Avenue. It was the conae,:sus of the Board that Administrative Review No . 8U-32 ba continued for one (x ) week in order to 'r input from orange County Sanitation staff members . Rovemlber 19, 1980 - Administrative Review No . 84- 32 was continued fox two ( 2 ) weeks at the request of applicant in or►iet to allow them (Balboa Const_r uction) to meet with Orange County Sanitation i)istrict . } Mini.-storage facility April 22 , 1901 Page 3 December. 3 , 1900 - Administrative Review Ne . 80-32 was again continued , at the applicant ' s request , for one ( 1) week . December 10 , 1.980 - BSA adopted Negative Declaration No . 80-49 and approved Administrative Review No . 80-32 with Conditions . One of these conditions being dedication of Banning and slope easement prior to building permits . December 22 , 1980 - Applicant (Balboa Construction Co . , Inc . ) filed an appeal to the Planning Commisaion requesting • that Condition #2 of AR 80--32 asking for dedication of Banning Avenue be waived . JA nuary 30 , 1981 - Applicant (Balboa Construction Co . , Inc . ) was informed that Condition J2 imposed by the Board of Zoning Adju-stments was an improper condition and was intended for clarification only, that dedication is an Ordinance Code requirement, and, if they (Balboa) felt a hardship could be d+aaionotrated, a, Conditional Exception application, to the Planning Commission could be filed. February 11 , 1981. - Balboa Construction Co . , Inc. filed a Condition Exception application to the Planning Commission asking for waiver of Banning Avenue dedication. I March 5, 1981 Applicant (Balboa Construction Co. , Inc. ) was notified their application, Conditional Exception No . 81-02 was officially accepted this date and that a public; hearing date was being set for March 17 , 1981 . March 17 , 1981 - Application Conditions' "• ception No . 81-2 was denied by the Pla nm n Commission this date. !larch 27, 1961 - Applicant (Balboa Construction Co. , Inc . ) filed an appeal to the Planning Commission action of March 17 , 1981 anti asked for ac hearing before City Council, April 3, Ml - City Clerk published a "Notice ef. Public Hearing" appeal to the Planning Cammission 's denial; and set the date of hearing for April 20 , 1981 . April 20, 1981 de i Or f W.. ACR E EME NT Rf. '1 NttNTIhOTOW LIE.ICN PROPERTY LEASE AT PLANT NO. 2 FW00 EXPAW MINt ` SPECIFICATION NO. L-010 + P. O. Oou IOU U COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 . of Orange County, Ca 1NMy1b�1�,�tpJ6+ltt��r corporation , acting for itself and as Agent for County Sanitation Districts was, 2, ) , S, b , 7, and 11 , of Orange County . public corporations , herein- after called "LANbLOW , to consideration of the covenants and #yreements contained herein, does hereby ?came to AMERICAN STAR-ALL , A General Partnership, whose address Is 830 South Cutlld Streetr.Fullerton, _California 12b32 , hereinbfter called "TENANT"; and Tenant hereby leases from landlord that certain real property , situated in the County of Orange , State of Califcrnia , which is more particularly described hereinafter . ( 1 ) TERM. The term of this least shall be five (5) years beginning September 1 , 1979 and ending _August 31 , 1984 Upon mutual :agreement as to rent and Landior^." s intent to further least said real property, this term ray be extended up to five (5) rears provided that tenant , ninety (90) dayi, before expiration of the initial term and each subsequently approved extension thereof , applies in writing to landlord for each said extension. The max i inum of al 1 ext ens i nns hereunder sha 1 1 not exceed the sure of' five (�) years . (2) AFNYAL . Tenant shsli pay the Landlord as rental for the real . property leased Under the terms of this lease the sum of Seven Thousond *nd 00/I00 Dollars (S7.000.00) per annum for each of the five years of the initial term of said lease. Rental payments shall be due and payable annually in advance on September Ist in the event of an ex(ension of the term of this )case as prov ;dad for in Paragraph ( 1 ) , tandlord and Tenant shall mutually agree to the annual rental amount foi• .each extended tern prior to t' vprovaT of Laid extension by Landlord. i tr,� r � i` J } Tenant shall allow rio noxious weeds to 4o to seed and shall ` .. r �,. keep ltw prom I,et frtr from Needs, grosses, and rodents. Tenant shall maintain the1wern,i. in es qcv,.,d rondo ior- as the s*me now are or may hereafter be put, and upon ter minat icn of this least , shall, except sE hereofler provided in Paragraph (6)0 deiiver posession of the se►rne to Landlord in suhatantially the Borne condition as it received timm and free of weeds, debris and improvements. Tenant shall not commit waste of the premises. (4) p551GNMENT. Tenant stroll not eaaicn this lease without the prior written consent of landlord, which oSel; not be urtressonably withheld. Landlord does axprressly eckrlowietlgp that it is the intent of Tenant to conttrunt multiple units of small rental storage facilitieM. E and this Section s`rs:l no; be construed as barring a subletting of the ;ndivid-usl spaces Con- structed or irrKelled on the premises. (5) ENI RY. Tenant shall permit Landlord or its ag,nts to enter upon the prernisei i at al.1 reasonsbie times for the purpos,-s of inspecting said premises, maintaining, or repsir- ing the L sndlord's facilities and appurtenwinces installed an, in or through the premises. � W' AL•1LRA7 )ON- 5. Ter•riot shall not change not alter the premises in any materia 4+W r rnrinncr vr,'. ,lout the prior wi itten consent, of Landiicrd. 'renant shall not ennstruct nor place upon the premises structures, irnprove+ninte, or facilities of any kind whatsc,-ver without first recelving written consent os Landlord. Prior to receipt of Raid virilten consent, Landlord and Tenant shall rnutuaNy determine, and agree thereto in writing, if sold alterations, structures, improverneMs,or facilities shall become the property c•f Landlord upon termination of this lerese, and, if so determined to become the.+ property of Landlord, Tenant here►ay Agrees to leave sanrt upon vscati►,g said 1, rFmises. Landlord reserves the right from time to timt to make W-territions or improvements deemed nevestary pirsuant to this provision. Growing of crops is not recommender.! and, (heref ore, shall not be allowed without Prior written ronsen; of Landlord, If Tenant receives wr:ttt�n permission from Landlord) to c-ow rrnj-s, Tcnint ir to rf-gi,l,ztt- the use of said " 0�' .1. 1 • �J � 7 '� to i4" "f r If r .>I ' �T4y', ,.W', ,y►�'yp�r,ll?RN�'�9 fi, W A' •, •�4. 00*15el► so that Ony $06 growl"# crops can be raatvved on the 'termloat ton w of this loses malt$* Tenon# has received written consent of Landlord to u Oittow the Urn of this lease for this purpose of harvest ing a grow!np crap. $$1A extenslea post bo prontod More arty such crop is planted, UTIL�s Tenant agrees to be resppasiblo for pros1dIng any tnel Mli Ytil hies .rptbtrired by Tenant during the term of this lease, entities provided by Landlord, if any, are set forth on Exhibit 'W'g attached hereto and made a part Woof. (3) DRE&C.14._. to the event Tenant shall rsake default to any. of Its agre*r mitts .,heriin cotttaln+ed or subsequently' mutual I agreed to, Tenant shall forfe(t all r (ghts and*e this lease; and Landlord or its agents may , at their option , teraarnate this loose and take immediate possession by action of forcoable '4 entry and detainer or may ava i 1 themselves of any legal remedies ;bay may f Own possoss. 0, INSOLVENCY, if Tenant has either (a) n receiver appointed to take potsession of all *r substantially all of the assets of Tenant , and W takes or submits to any oct ion under any Insolvency or bankruptcy mct and for a period of thirty (30) days does not terminate or remove any such appointment assignment or action; then and In that event , the lease shall be considered toririn&ted automatitsl )y and without further notice, and all gr(xiing craps on said leased premises shall become the property of Landlord as of the date of termination. (10) URMINATION aY LANDLORD, The parties hereto rnconniac 'hat the Landlord is a public Corporation providing sanitary sewage collection, treat- merit , and dispossl service for the major port ion of the County of Orange , and that in the event of substantially changee conditions or a health emergency , Landlord may require the use of the premises herein leased , or- a portion thereof , and"In such event Candlord .hefcby reserves the rigtit to terminate ,end cancel 1 w 3- } d. �,'�.�'{'�1'I , r♦ • � i • , , r"M;1,. �n. I• r ,� VFW�� +.'i A'iwilm ) 'days written notice 1ven to Tsa&nt. in the and•aantellotl-,n by toodlord. Tenant sha11 ba rt- • r ` ' i rrt 1o+r�Mtd asN+t of prepaid sad unearned rent. (#I) Nit& Whenever under the terms of this lease any notice Is to ` 1%*41 4' Other &#' the parties or whenever Tenant Is to awke rental pay- I Ii+IM i tp &000114wd* tha. s shall ie $.l veo or me4o by enclosing the sates In ' ati' i�a with. poste$* Prepol�l and by t>alli011 such envelope as ? ,s' ' 4' tot$ara: " -LAVOLOM: County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County P. d. Box $127 Fountain Valley,, California 92706 Rf w, YENANt•I Mrrtriean Star-All 830 South Euclid Street ' Fullerton, California 92632 (12) USE AND CAMPLIAWCE WITH LAW. Landlord is of the opinion that the best use of the premises Is for growing nursery stock, which such use is doyttasd compatible with landlord's operattans adjacent to the loosed preml!►es, will cause minimal environmental Impact and reflec: 1imittd public access to the leased promises. Tarrant intends to use sa id premisci solely fors,torp � f,2�11 Tenant shall , at its sole cast and exp;,nse, comply with all the requirements of all municipal , state , read federal authorities now in force or which may hereafter be in force pertaining to the use of said pronflse% and shall faith- fully observe in the use of the premises ail municipa? ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force or which may hereafter be in force, and obtain necessary permits or 11cerses therefor. Tenant shall be responsible } for , and pay directly, any and all taxes , fees , cheres, and assesirroents 1ivied I .•r16ar''�''p,'1,'R',i,l }II�rr,. :V. V r�i r,xr 1 d 11�. • •tPi r k ' A •r in'q$/rsrr,ct Ion with use of sold premises, The Judgomeot of any court of a ' , 'k' , ANi.Owtiftt • jurlsdistlew or the admission of Tenant in any action or proceeding aWn*t 1ronant, whether landlord be a party thereto or not , that Tenant has '- violated any such ordltwn" or statute In the use of the promises *hall be conclusive of that fact as be t wwn landlord and Tenant , (11) LAMOL"D TO ME HELD HAIIMLESE. Tenant, as material part of the con- sideration to be rendered to landlord, hereby agrees that it will 10114 Land- lord anowt end harmless freer any daraege or injury to any person or, to the property of any person arising from the use of the premises by the Tenant or• from the failure of the Tenant to keep the premises In good condition and repo l r Ms herein provided.. , ff (14) LIABILITY INSURANCE. Tenant further agrees to take out and keep In forca during the life hereof, at Tenants's expense, public liability in- surance in companies and through brokers acceptable to Landlord to protect against any 1 iabl l icy to the pvbl tc Incident •to the use of or resulting from any accident occurring In or about the promises , the liability under i such Insurance to be not loss than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100.000.00) for any ono person Injured or Three Hundred Thousand ($300,ODO.00) for any one accident or One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000. 00) for aroperty damage. ' Sold insurance covora94 obtained by Tenant shall name Landlord as an additional Insured. Tenant shall provide Landlord Certificates of in- surance as evidence of said coverage. ( IS) DESCRIPTION OF LEASED PREMISES, Landlord represents that it will lease to Tenant at the northeast corner of Srookhurst Street and Banning Avenue in the City of r..HuntingtonBeach . - ^. not less than , 6.0 net usable. Acres. Landlord further represents that said 6.0 net acres are shown and r C 1 ry ,•fir:.1' ),;. / +r " 11 tt M111 lahibl w A' ad juft1 . 270 hereto. „�. n���/ as.i� ; '' I�r t M � f Landlord his nsad to occupy any of said 1tosed promises $ either. r: F ` r r or or +tie t�rrrat ro,r of the looses the reduction In srer to be be calculatedti►e+ rental p;yoantt prawlded In 'a pro ratty, and Tenant •h*11 be refunded tlMe < `` "00e r00rte afty rt of '00rpa'10 sirs wworrrtd rent. ' if VITUS$ i11 ftL Of. the parties herat.o ,here substwlbe4i thsiy elpnaMure: thl a 11th day of July, 1979 . LAM M1b: County S3nitatton Cibtrict No. i of Orange County, Cal iforaieo a public corporation IJ • Aso r,•r 404* tc tN,' r o ►e£tows ____ 1 MART: "rlcanv for-A) 1 , a general• partnership ONO i APpItYCp AS TO FOAM AND LEGALITY ,a . 1 C� •6- r r; i s Z�V7y •n ! ;4 01 ts*,+ UTILITIES : No utilitie* are provided y Ian lord . if needed , Tenant &110 must obtain water from City of 5 . 1640of.10 1•(.•I Huntington Beach and electrical ' d pone* from Ho. Galit . Woo Co. 6fA. I9d♦at.67 6)w PC OfA tOd 05,00-0.8, • 5AYfA YA d tl�l. ArO II a owl AVAILAOLF VA � I � AVAI � - rL oos) WALL 1 f 061f 1410P Af CA RESTR l CT 1 ON$ : Ya Area between west edge of 48 " line and west edge of Santa Ana River - levee . 2) Due to eNisting underground utilities including 2 each-100 pair Communication cables , l each-6" plastic digester gas line and 3 large sewers . Ha digging, boring or tither soil disturbance is permitted . 3) No structures are permitted . COUNTY SANITi fTOR-V_0S_VCCYS 1 ) potted plants etc . , may be set in ORAWE COUNTY• CALIFORNIA this area, provided that the area must bt cl earod upon recaipt of 30 A � � 2 days written notice for consu-uct-i on AGrICUL JAL LrA5ir of now lines etc . , and must be cleared _ 1pm diately for any emergency repaii rs ^ �, _ � �I''+ zoo' to underground f act l i t l es required by �.•__ the�iatriets. �.�C'._ .4.......... . .. _ � . . r � 6 ' 1y.r 11*7 Y /1 r£R7 ,��N► Y•.M�. ''+ Y. ' • .. I.��. .yrri• . �.r�.Y..� na•�.+•s.ter•S+ ' . 'r ' ' i -- 5 I Ire CHARGE OF Npsrlc or . #posit aA; WMERAN; CountyaAilatioe district No. I of Orange r�-$forals, a public corporation, a$ Landlord &nd ;,`'; •` 1 100gito" Mtor-All , o donreRui partnership, as Tenant executed ttsoae Certain Agreements No Property tease at plant Roo 1 , 604tion Not L-Uo! and Agreement Ne property Lease at p1:N16*, *0 2 Specification No. L-010 , both 4ated July 130 1979; and".. WHEAEAN, the 'Correct name of the said tenant IS Amerionn Balboa Properties * a general partnerships NOWO TUMFORE, both of the aforesaid af:eemonts are hexob$ smomhd by iphanging the now* of the tenant thereunder to ►rteric N Pr op#gties. .,. ' IW KI THESS wHEnw, the patties have executed this ` n v , b instrument tr�srent as f a No erg er 1979 . , AML.AICAN RAL POA PROPERTIES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT V0. 1 s l400rti partnership OF ORANGE COhNTYg CALifORNIA ( for;erly known as a public corporatic'n Ar.#iJCen Stor-All , aw f4r.er!af Partnership) Py VALF0A . CC.!;$7-Rt1CT1ON co. , ISC. s fax i r,� r rl9 '', • +ram y _ `h / I P'�"Acc K F t e s i�E n t a Chi a C t ----�-�-�- ----- rFctarB By Lr :).tD YNo 1FED1§P.qW, artnrr Oy. _ • � . ... .__.. S azd o D3 rectors N `.10 ?:I4L1� L. -5h'4:$ ER, Partner AP VE AS 70 FORM AND I.PGA LI i Y Attorri y f r �Y�D3st t c i r� Psi .. . .�._.._�....�._ r t • r 11 4•' IZ'a'Y*win. r1 46 cow }raga. STY cwftt CITY W MWII ON NAC11r -CITY CLARK PA,40F;QF PUhILICATIDH Pub 1 it Nearing 81-01 F coloft Omw �r. of } Ma Jo Richter 1101•m wed A ap tiara+berdn mretkaW wow citizen of the gated 8tetas,am the to of tw4m v-0ne yam and that I an eat a pour to♦nag hdwa*W in Ow abm entitled matter; &d 1 am the p+'iaoipwi diet}at a*printrr of the AwAimton Beach mod. Review a aewapop.r of saeetal rirtuhrtko,puh1Wwd 1n the city of r Wot#mtan Koch V-Umktw at Chi dad wMA uewspoW is publisbed for the at 6 wl news wd Wt*Wgmft of w gwm d Chirac- tar, mad wmmw nrrwep ter ot all times hereia waentiorred had ad 90�a bows No submiptioa list a(paying .ubpMbom a w wl" ae+wpar a hm bore mobUsh4 printed aid pob• hirirnt at .egatae into IWe in the raid CKaaty of Orenp ror 0 '. ptrriad aoesadtap eras yar, tint the MAIN, of whkh the ooae"d is a printed cw, bw been pubbdwd in dw iftWor OW entire isew of add eewspapar, and not in any adppkment thusaf`,as the Mbwim dotes,to nit: 5 Awl l 99 i98f i osrWy(or declare) un&r pww&y of perjury that the forep• WE is tare ewd correct. Dated at... ..........gerdei~•8rarit.. . ........ • turl lr • i 1 Fine 06.GAF-81M y^� '1•;r''`a��''• ,'. •fir ,1, .+—r y41 ' t H M Qtt' F+OF� CITY COLNOIL ACTION h, A i1 10t 1981 ,•4 � . OW 0: Honorable Mayor and City CounciI DENIED 6AWAe W bV: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator ivy H OL P r*1- Department of Developnent Serviced "'...".,.. ho ..,,r..r ` f.....r,................. .... APPEAL OF CONDI'TION.AL EXCEPTION NO. 81-1, A REDUCTION IN THE PARKING STALL SIZE FOR A PERCENTAGE OF THE R$QUIRSD PARKING SPACES FOR THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT* 8wkup N 1N AttmW: C d YM H No . *oft"of law PANa r u dedon, Fund $euror,Alt�nstiwv Acdm: STAT=jj UF' .. 3M: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal to the Planning Caission' s denial of Conditional Exception No. 81-01, a request to allow a reduction in the parking stall size for a percentage of the parking spaces for a mixed use development. Y t , The Planning Commission recormends that the City Council uphold their decision and deny Conditional Exception No. 81-01. MUM: UPILM: Pacific Design and Development 423 S. LaSalle St. Oirange, Calif. 92666 AR&ICART: Same 1r_�TTOAs East side of Gothard Strut, approximately 790 ft. south of Heil Avenue. R T: To permit a reduction In the required parking stall size of 90 x 191 to 81 x 151 ,for a percentage of the required parking in a mixed commercial/industrial development. PLANNING COMl S 1ION ,C TjQL QE. ,CH 17,, 1981: ON MOTION BY 13AUER AND SECOND BY -lANNISTER, CONDITIONAL EXCEP" ION NO. 81r-01 WAS DENIED WITH A FINDING OF NO SUBSTANTIAL HARDSHrP, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYESt Bannister, N'inchell, Schumacher, Sauer NOES: Kenef ick ABSENTz Porter ABSTAIN: Done now 1 • it r i i 1Nyr i Conditional Exception No. 81-01 r : I& The Comission finds that there is no substantial hardship r existing or the subject property which mould Justify the granting of this conditional exception. 4n May 20, 19801 the Planning Commission approved a mixed use development located on the east side of Oothard Street, approxi- mately 790 ft. south of Hail Avenue. This mixed use development ' is primarily industrial with two buildings, one parallel to Gothaird Street and the other perpendicular to Gothard Street that will be used for office/commercial uses. The applicant f is requesting that two bays of parking located in front of each of the mixed use buildings have a reduced parking stall dimension from the required 91 x 19 , to 80 x 151 . t;T The entire project consists of 18 buildings with on-site WXing of 654 spaces The two buildings approved to be used for mixed use development are required to have a total of 184 parking specesw The applicant is requesting that 37 of these required parking spaces be allowed to be developed at the reduced size. ' T s would comprise 20 percent of the required parking spaces for the two mined use development buildings. The applicant has indicated that by allowing the reduction In the parking stall simeo additional landscaping can be provided in front of the two buildings designated for mixed use. In addition to the additional landscaping provided by the reduction of parking stall size, the applicant has also indicated that the need for CaVact spaces is greater adjacent to the mixed use buildings, In that a portion of these compact spaces will be designated for r employees, therefore, being used as long-term parking . The Planning Cons iasion' s main concern was the concentration of these reduced parking stall spaces, in that they were located In tMo specific areas and not provided for throughout the entire •r industrial project. It should be noted that the overall project has 834 spaces, however, only 615 spaces are required per code. Therefore, there are 39 spaces over the requirement. The appli- cant is requesting 37 be of the reduced size. The Commission felt that the reduced parking stall spaces would be more beneficial to the project if they were provided through- out the entire project and that under the specific request, the applicant did not demonstrate a hardship in order to warrant the granting of Conditional Exception No. 81-01. .IXIME= STM : Pursuant to Section 15105 of the California Environmental Quality Act, this conditional exception is a Class V, Categorical Exemption. i aita V} ',, 1 „p. •.• I�ri ` r, I,�' r i 0 R ' I A '1���r RRRRffff i'y, 1y • ..I Y Y �.. �p��►� �xti�►A �. 81�Q1 Ikm Applicable a t Tm City Council may consider overturning the Planning Commission' s denial of this application and approve Conditional Exception No. }ti . 81-41 with the following findings: 1. The granting of this conditional exception, allowing a reduction in parking btall size, will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare or injurious to the conforming land, property, or improvements in the neighborhood In the property for which this conditional exception is caught 2+ Because those reduced parking spaces are in excess of the required ou dvr of parking spaces for the entire project, an exceptional circumstance exists which does not apply generally to properties or rlesses of use in the same district. 3* The applicant .is willing and able to carry out the purpose for d which this conditional exception is sought and will proceed to do so witbo;4t unnecessary delay. I, I' 1. Area May 2. Planning Comission Staff Report dated March 3, 1981 and Nareb 17, 1981 3. Letter from Applicant I Prepared by t etnee K. Pa1in, director De ent o Development Service partta fs i JWP:SMH:gc l y'11 Ir� 71IF1 T' � Nr1 i, 5�4� T 4'.1, .�.• � � f� �'. F ar 11 -41 • bunch t r beach dswlapnrwst services department ff Ed 1 SPORT. --ma Toe Pla8wing c4mmissioti !'RlaMI Wportusent of Development Services DATX: March 17, 1981 NVWRMi COND14.— XXCUTION NO. 81-01 At the March 3, L381 manning, the Planning ComamlBalon continued Conditional Xxceaptwn 'Wo . 91.-01. This item was continued because of a lack of four affirswRtive votes on the motion . The subject application is a rw4uest to reduce 37 parking stalls for the 'Industrial develorAwnt located on the east side of Gothaard Street, ap1proxUAtea1Y 790 feet south of Nall Avenue, from the required 9 'y. 19' space to a 80 x 151 space. The stP1f I s reco mendation 'is the same as outlined in the attached staff reapext dated March 3, 1901, except for the addition, of a third corAi t ion of approva l. f s 3. All of they reduced. parking stall .-npaces small be marked as ' epsbt parking only. ` 1. Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 3, 1981 i c I 1 i i A-frW4is IN 1 �is '� IA iL d 'v1-�4 _i !' rya aly '.� ' ';' i i. r I •r CIA , r, r 1Y • r Yr: ."untkoon beach devolopmeN services department Af f '. SrEPORT- 1*1. planning Commission "cog Development Services i OATZ: March 3. 1981 1� ' ! ONA1Le WF �• . _ NO; 81;0l AMI, !roLtt Pas-ii tr. j.,;;a (7n & Development Patef Accented: 413 S. r13sr • 1. Orange, rf3 . g2666 Feb. 11, 1981 nd§torX prQces-gIngwPatg= $egmel: Reduction of parking stall Size. . April 12, 1981 a, z..e : M-1 ,atl9n ; East side of GQt_hard St south of Heil and north of Warner . General Plan : Industrial Existing U1e : ' Mixed Use Development (under construction) 120 SUGGAAM ACT101r s The staff is recommending that the Commission approve Conditional Exception No. 81--01, a request to reduce the parking stall size from .the required 9 x 19 ft. to 8 x 15 ft. for the portion of parking in excess of the requirement for the overall project. 2.9 } , INFO on May 20, 1950t the planning Commissior. approved a mixed use develop- ment located on the east side of Gothard Street approximately 790 ft. south of Heil Avenue. This mixed use development is primarily industriall with two buildings, one parallel to Gothard Street and the other perpen- dicular to Gothard Street that will be used for office/commercial used. The applicant is requesting that two bays of parking located in front of each of the mixed use buildings have reduced parking dimension sizes f r. tam the required 9 x 19 ft. to 8 x 15 ft. ok AILL A•+Ili —T— ! i� �fi I ,� T•. T ! 1 • . !n..' :t •YJrl1• 4v r.•d v -� p �y fir, , q . , •Y• 1, as 1. �i;�Y� n f r • .. .. � ; , j�3'' rho �• *Owe .r,„ rWON 1 Z ,1 r Ut*t *wVIeving the proposed project, the staff has identified the 16WIhO ilsssstuosr N111 they reduced parking dimension size impact the 6V*>Ira11 project and lessen the convenience to the patrons of the center? Pur*Uisnt to the rirov ions of the Environmental Quality Act, this tditional ExcMp..io.:A .ioei not need to have any environmental asoesss- mant or review at this PRUINT ,I ,.909s, 40NING, AN2 SENAL PLAIT. A.gt§I NATIQ Subject property in located on the - east side of Gothard Street, approxi- mately 790 ft. mouth, of Heil Avenue and is .zoned M-1, Light Industrial . The subject property is designated on the General Plan as Light Industrial and is presently being developed with a mixed use, industrial/ commercial development . The property to the north is also zoned M-1 and is designated on the Gen6ratl Plan as Light .Industrial and ,has been developed with a small industrial park, The property to the east across the railroad right. t.- of-way is developed with single family homes in an Rr-1, Lowy Density Residential District . The Warner Avenue Drive-In is located to the south across the Grange Bounty Flood Control District Channel. Propertl to the wessst, across Gothard Street, contsainb an apartment development within an R-3, Medium High Density Residential Zone and a small in- dustrial development :located within an M-1 zone. 620 AMU IS: The applicant his requested that 37 of the. total 654 parking sp-ces be allowed to be reduced in ssi xe from the required 9 x 19 feet tog x 15 feet In order to provide some compact parking spaces-and to increase land- scaping in the area's of the two mixed- development building's. The overall project in required to have 615 parking spaces, the proposed plan is providing 654 spaces or 39 spaces over. the requirement. The applicant is requesting that 37 of these spaces be of the compact 'size. At the original onset, the staff did not have the problem with the reduced stall size for those 'space's in excess of the requirement, however, after analyzing the plan, the staff required that the applicant file a conditional exception because of the location of the spaces . All of the compact spaces have been located in front of the two mixed usebuildings . The applicant, has indicated that this reduced parking space will provide several advantacies to the overall project. (1 ) Additional landscaping will be provided in these area's; (2) the need for compact spaces is greater adjacent. to the mixed use buildings then in the re- maining portion of the project and ( 3) a portion of the compact space's will be designated for employees , theyreforet being used as long term parking . (`,Q � ^4YyF' f 4^ 1• .11,.. . .��'I_' ' . - '' ' � • i • i, �, .. � ^ ., i �hta'. ,fit, � ' s,: ,,, , , • .,, ' ,, • �;+�k + r " �� 'ti Z "di' �( fit•'• .�n:+ .y . + .A Y , ..r. KaL "�•�'' . ,EMI f ' I / Ca 8l-01 i page 'three The staff has analyzed the applicant' s request and concurs with the i }; justification for this request . Since the overall project is in excess of parking, the compact spaces need not even be provided, however, additional convenience will be provided to the ubers of � this center with the compact spaces and the additional parking. �-" Therefore, based on the above information, the staff is recommending ` that the Planniract :' :.wmisai can approve this request find allow a reduction i1h the +, r ng stall size for this additional. parking . 7.d . REC01�lMEMpATJuN s The staff is recommending, that the Manning Commission approve Conditional Oxception No. 81•.01 with the followi.ny findings and conditions: � �1Nt'IYL�C3S: 1. The granting of this conditional exception allowing a reduction in parking stall size will not be materially detrimental, to the public health, safety, and welfare, or injurious to the conforming lar I property, or improvements - in the neighborhood of the property for rthich this conditional exception ie sought. 2. By allowing additional parking spaces at a reduced size, the granting of this conditional exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights . 3. Flecalase these reduced narking spaces are in excess of the required number of parking, an exceptional circumstance exists which does not apply generally tc properties or classes of use in the same district. 4. the applicant is willing and able to carry out the purposes tor which the cnnditional exception is sought and he will proceed to do so without unnecessary delay. ScJCGFSTED CONTY 1TJct4S .DF AEEROYAL 1. The site plan received and dated February 5, 1581 shall be the approved layout . 2. Xf the parking for the overall project is reduced for any reason, then the applicant is required to provide at a I to 1 ratio standard size parking stalls in place of the proposed compact spaces. 4 :gc T 1 . Area Map 2 . Site Plan received and dated 2/5/81 ' 4, 3Y LUILL.11 Le lb I IINSTAI_. 1 r Cl 1 E ••+ 1 p _ " r' o - - --_ f x _ �, n �1 .._ _ 4•_ 4 4 DARDON 4Nv I i •"'l ►fir ��� .C7 _—. 1 r w [ITr t .'—•rmj c n •a OZ uj W RHONE TIAFR L M Ile r , _ ..w C, ,\ 109% ollrl 1 1 i • llwv •1 Fr� r o - - SRI 1981 _�j- 1kr�ch 20, ice_ S City of Huntington Beach 2WO Mai n St. P. 0. Box 190 Hu1ftington Beach, Calif. 92648 Re.' Conditional E ,M Exception �81-� Attention: City Clerk to the Planning Commission I Daar Mrs. Alicia Wentworth: - Please accept this letter as notice of appeal to the City Council by Pacific Design and Development, agent for Princeland Properties, owner of Tract #10446, now under development. The reasons for this appeal are we aid not have sufficient opportunity to explain our case to all comissioners present at the two consecutive regular meetings of the Planning Ca Isslor. As admitted by the colmlissioners absent from the first hearing, the tapes had not been heard and they were un-aware of what had transpired. Since public hearings were not re-opened at the second session, it is felt the commissioners could not offer a fair Judgement on the case, yet they did not abstain from voting. It is our sincere hope that the reasons noted are sufficient to warrant are appeal to the City Council . Very truly yours , Pacific Design DevelopmentG. - . GJH/fr ..' 413 C41= 11 COMM CA 9688 F 7MJ 997--397D t a't - March 231, 7981 City of Huntington Beach ZOQD Main St. P. 0. Box 190 Butington Beach, Calif. 92648 Re: Conditional Exception #81-01 to the Planning Ca Ission Attention: City Clerk Haar ors. Alicia Westworth: Per our telephone conversation 3/23/81 with the city clerks office, please note the folloOng expanded explanation to the appeal dated 3, 20/81 . Pacific Design, as agent, applied tur cmrpact space allotment under conditional exception #81-01 . The size and percentage of spacE� allocated for compact cars has been twice approved by the planning comission, in the pa=+. for other developers. It is our contention .r that denial places a hardship on the developer as it deprives him of uses enjoyed by other developers with similar circumstances. Enclosed please find a check for $150.00 appeal fee as requestta_ Very trti:y yours, Pacific Desiy,. Developr&nt GGJH/fr _ t 413 S. Gimell*Orange.CA 92M• (714)9+97 3970 1, fA 4a;-04 h�� 1 1 Wish Agri i !, 19e1 ' ,��1.• y .YI',li •y� llyyJ, y n• d; ,,',y,• 'i � , �..,. . r 'Fib T NOTt _ . ! trl . ireldr Cityuncil } j tl* M1C C4litiaroPftsIbI • or NtV Parp+ ' ',� :.i�lr�ngr Ga�rindion' 1t1N1 4t Cand'it1 1 <ti•.4 :y , 'PnM on is paPO4 ml I lift fft, �: ' �; ft..` ,fta for thoee s ce$ in excu*of •�� :'..;,.r 1 it �n indastrial cWlex and pia 1oCat r y . te1y 720 ft.- aokh of Mail ' A err vZ4' AA"fw:�' • .1 1 .1 Iw• A 1 A 1 1 d i" pt1q ,'. ,'' �, * -�� ayl nt of Davelopwo"t Serwiaes Office. j Al 1. low w 1 to' MOM "Id hearing add express their the 4ffiCe of the City Clank, Mein Stet, Ilyh'c :' •C� f i. (714) 556- 87 Im CITY OF MU�ITIti6TON UACH BY: Alicia M. Wentworth ;: sircity Clot � ��' �•,( �^ ice, '�r '� � � � + �, �. A ♦n� k 'i Ar� .� R1 '•�� � 1<A��•, ArPf`��4 i �� b1� Y�hN t 'P,L+ a � :yAYk' ��� S•� , 4, {"�l`r.,}, ` ,' .y+, I A VS'�� .' � . "RI ?T {`fR",�,a!"�1d�r •i�, �1`+ r��i����A k �l`��i:�4'�,��LL���'• ', •.r/�,.Jwi��•FY,, vp;� 't� 1#v�'�� , .)fir•� ' O cm 10 L1C main 21 ^f `'�.• no A 000. will 141* I � 4 w ' t *""*Lft "I" .A'. . . for ' ' rl•�r�is� :rw�at - +�eiria�r � idol M. awt wwdlas to be r"uL2v! in tba 1ep1, MIT" ., h i I' I • � art �"IN IMATR M rMioNNINIA IN atM144 00 t'f*A%yt tot thtw W iW M�A�111 llr�Al F Aty t Arm 1 Rita, is R1*tgw C' Thu!Mn and at A LWw homier tarot =W on i aifirmn of the Uadtad ItWU%ow do air at 1rw*-am pw%and that 1 � ! .'�M lot so tad i pa!!r* at w Itil-MR,l In 440 abm.mod WOW, thAl i go tyre pcbAw gwa d(tlta Oww.rd of Makp"a Nwtw t wpaprt y�asrNl elyd�ti�-1-1004 PIldrrMl loth#chy of M11MMI'VIN•UNN ter,and eMA a!A AW bNrM mimes.*bad ,%W MIN has a 1Mt itt�auioarrtiwra, and whkt+ 1% -pop d ad pub. IWW at twNder ittteev&is do trill at am*1*a Pad eseee#lttd tote pw. 60 Nra r.tlte. air do "Iwi%W it a p*Wd uW. bM brat t1 M on.eltt w and and Nsw of .MAd tills ih er■a► t harMd,np tha dalat.in VIA lr*ww r sot Wl I crrfify fnr dathmel WAN pealttti of pee**tart tM 1aala il"in true sad freshet. Dawd at......... .......... 1"` A........ ... .. ...�►f!.!!its.. .�. + 11 '............... ... . ,tww Nr Cas•ttLVO , �• 4.7 1' PwLfIq Um4p 142-152-25 413S+ MaWmU 00-16 J MW" L a►M= P.O. 9m M M oisi D t actttt 7512 MhLms Wim Wc&'DCLVB IMt IM-1lit re Bndbf Cyrw 1 92647 , it IW*t Oil ! `'#1=�r1.k..pp '#14 UNM41 Cif P.Q. Lm P 92647 romta* Wusy, Ci U2-156-07 93707 d p 14lem Jr Jbh n H 0 IMU Mort Leer 16561 muw• LOS • • co, twit 647 142-14;i-� ��i 142"l52`-x0 outhod 't Bull W11 ford Ttffm d 16"2 1 AIML 400 Owbo CUtle 1,6571 Kxxo YA sitar 425 owma Dal Nor" Co &Atirrgbm Haag, Cali 1 vi-f - Q .�.9,92?].5 92625 92647 •; 142-152-15 14 1i2�-1�, 1�1�'�-15fr-09 • -� ; 9" G Wight D J RAM w Van* 16592 IM IAM 16652 RIM& Lma 16591 Rh m - Imm litwti� ton Br r WA >mmah, Cali,! , Heed, call ' "•'' rt 92+647 92647 92647 F'. �142-152-16 W-m-22 142-156-10 A ! J&Oobs i AMI-M-1.1-IMr Cade C Nblz Rhygod R Vidal B.O. Bw 655 16672 ftm law 16601 Awe xam ' 5111 lam, cc.11f 9264� ti, O tlif Had of m i Hac#1, Cai,l f 92647 1,42-152r-x7 142-L%2-25 242-156-U 1"12 won Larne 16692 16d� *no Zone Such, Gam! e-7 goon . Cali � Beech, Calf ., 92M92647 142-1S2-Y6 142-152-24 142-IW12 ' l p i amrinm H Smith Dwol d A Zdci+aL*a UU Brow Drive 16531 Sun lawk.;� '+ • call f' iU*IngtM 8Wh, Cayi.f 92647 92647 1 aA, f �J � �/ r Irk %FNI r M• /am �a1-mil_ 142-451-09 1"31 ami 1" may 50 01990 (JH) 7512 hn a Drive + 'r 92"7 992647 , 142-U6-IA 142-4.1-10 *&hum A jam NoMb w H tlil oar ' 16641 Was 14= 15743, Law 7522 VbuUmp t rive x�aa Bnaah, CAW tm 4 ., Ca113� 9Z647 Bsaat�, Cal 4 . .92647 SMW R r h , rI NUUMr 1ICib51.Xwo tam am Ofto tam 7532 Watago Drive k, I l Cir�ptiO4 H ey C�iii! l Ch, Qetli amtitg � h� C214 f 92647 03"7 . 92647 1.42--156-16 142-M-03 142--451-33 J n It Dow ftmoir 9 Cluke 3rd Alpbxm A 1tti" s 16671 Ift in 1wa 1m1 I6'ntt- Law 16792 t�tt� Lie MOW now ftad4 2 • PUMAB �, C I LtE fah, Cali! 947 7 92647 142-1"-17 . 1.43--451-04 142-451-34 OWL* A ]awad 1l%t G10roon B Ge►z I , 1"91 ftwoLamer JAM Umm LWA P.O. SM 3146 92647 ' CW1ff 92647 , Calif 9074 Beach, Cali 142--156r-1.8 ' 1-0-45L-05 142-451-35 _ J"91 xa= 1IM 1r6791 Lunn 16762 l9aaria Lem •. , •r ntf�xitrorc► H mhab4 cot I tltwhnn Book,, G"a j f� 119h l . h, Cal.I ' 92647 92647 a,42-15b�19 142-451-06 142-451-36 am A 0=tin Mosel D Poland A-rAm N Ftney 16701 jt9w lam 1600i FAX)m lane 16752 Mum 7Am 2400he G24f dw Inc hip Cal I 1U*Anq1= Bach* Calif 92"7 92647 92647 1424 -A 142-451-07 142-451-37 16 * wR S f 0m Law 16OU Law 16742 Rtxm ire 4 0A13•f Ilea Ch Calif llUntington Beall, y2i4i 92641 92647 142-156-U 142-451-08 142-211-51 Ott J H ChIXI" Bairn Jose Feliciano 167U III" taw 7502 Uwtap Drive 439 Ivive was •001, HvQWo , Cd! f S m"ta, BO ch* Calif Nmwp3tt Bam#x, CAU d1h 92647 ikUK 92647 92660 C I k 5 lip 142-231-42 142-221-�01 0 DAMS CUP 18i�-14 Me i�lll�r A I�� ' 141 $ & boon abd aw 9r W (JH� a IM �r 9570 IMNIVILA rol+e 90Q 8 ftaftaln VkJ r 'Call 92719� 142Y-232-03 �`� 142-231-43 011.bwt rujJ=W ! Cal Bitaw 38" Vmti clit Wive bas�i��l'y► wr 2781 Ba hm Pl�aas �iur�t;� txan tea, am �1Yttptronmo Mwb► CAW ► 1'saw, Ce►lit ,9�649 7 92626 14*491-01 rrr�y► mirchat�d ws i7e�+Cbsr •� +• 9S�rMrsrt iac► ` Aaria* co, , col j f 100 W. Main Bt. etdt* 11 ... ,� 92807 7 Tustin, Calif 9268a 142-232-05 Aa3st F rugoom it Imalm d 120 SDd, wing St , 7311 ftiL m Dr Apt 01 lam x#l.�l�t wVm L� A vaim, Calif 9W52 �� r . 4 Attu;. SWf Assist 9 647 9 ?68 Damign 8 .142-232-30 142=231-23 ObIlph D 8kdtb Or 0 11 i ar A I&Tah U44 8Ww Um d Mk� Ct P*Oo RK 1623 San pip, i)IIf won Boomba CAW .90732 962647142-231-26 i l 2 im A Whim , w 14.t-23r1 142-231-27 idu A c`arlsM . d V Shasky $94x F+ek4 o Bach Cingo 16762 8a4an Law M% h a,net&, Cif broach, MlI 92"3 92647 30— -10 U2-23X-29 8dsdts W 2Udm c a7612 Onch Blvd.o Sint* 16 1623 UffiNkidnS LAW , 4 r C.t min PA.C*, air � ►, c�.f 9Z647' �� 14-23130 DM 0 COMM : 88% & ttw Cir. #e-526 9 � � F 26" t ! Ah � r 19 �AF�—.�r�r •F `.. � , ire r�`A .A`�f• ~ S•,�•' .r.., .r ,Yv1 ,; s , t ,, y ' '. „ :.� +1 �`�' 1Yi ion A Mob CITY OF MUW r{ 1 MAIN 61`NL6'TI CALIFORNIA MW OF=Or TM CITY CORK r' .0 r' Apri 1 2$o 101 Po"Iflc resign and 'odveloplmt 41$ S• La WU stroot � Orontes CA 92666 - :he city Comil -of the Ci of Huntington Beach at its regular m"ting held April . lghl , -danied your appeal to the p1.601ns Ctmissigri's finial of Conditional Exception No. 81-1. This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of Uction 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the state of California you have ninety days from April 28s M to apply to the courts for judicial review. If have any questions please contact this office - Aiicla14. Wentworth r City Clark AMW-.CR:Js '