Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional Use Permit - CUP 88-31 - Mark F. O'Donnell - 503 (7) I r. I ` �+.'►O•+JlO ►, �'u6 .ah �Q.s• 1A•^M�I, CI p. � f ++<:wQir� (t�Yl1W✓. �,,• "Vilcef ov :.SK h n r!• DI ' • supel+or :null OI 7+YnQ6 GJ11 11' C11U1prn.1• Numtel A 6214 ciiilitc! 1161 61%13 .,n r • "4 6 3 t L 4+ eq it j rrw 1963 STATE OF I17rJF1NIA .� s County of O►angr +ira ti0V . v.w M 1 wow •4 7a• tw+rr wfW I am a ClUrer of the Un+led States and a resident of the County atotesala I am over 1pe age of eighteen years and not a ;.ally to or interested in the below � entitled matte, I am a principal cletIA of the Orange J Coast QA10 PILOT with oh1ch 1s combined thlr J i NEWS-PRESS. a newspaper of general clrc:utet*n. ! wo �Doi" pnntea and published 1n the City of Costa Mesa, , County n1 Grange Slate of California, and that a Notice of M IMIy oft fat 1M� of rrhlcn Copt attacheC hereto is a true and COmplele cony was printed and nur)Iished in the Costa f.Aesa t>Mta► S�`� Ne*cort Seach, Huntington Beach. Fountain 'Walley ,a Irvine the South Coast commun►ttes and Laguna I~• Bract, issues al said newspapet lot .-__-•-- -- Mirk.►. consecutive weeps to w,f the issueas! of "Will +tr tMw sc an jam AV. au1 OG~M11waof f. 19 8 C raw dw ,_ ttaUal fr _. .. . _. 19e .. .._ x' w It A'1 oft I met -• - -._.. -__ .. _ ._ '98 taowa rM►e!c .Marta aa>I� 196 . W� a� . taifna ! declare. under penalty of perjury, that the 0 soft foregoing is true and correct. w e. Ex&cuted on . , tt emb c c 9 . 198 F. at Co .a Mesa. California,, Signature r "CW IN �Vti,�CA1'1aN Legal NO tics City of Mun:irwOn Biaeh O wg of the City Clerk P. 0. so it 190Huntinfl on Beach.CA 92648 J 1 b1 1 at l�I ot FIRST "'LASS NAIL.,t�1ph 04" 11 111111.411 4111111 slit 11 1 v • 4 Legal Notice City of Huntin/ton Beach Mee of the City clef P. O. Bon 190 - HunUnptort ileaah. CA 92d48 HE ► ��m.«.� FIRST CLASS MAID. 1 Publish e.,WIm If ■O'r r G"'"! Q,�,�r'9L I C I�R I APPEAL TO PLAN PLANNIbi C ISSUN UV USE PERM11 NO. a8-31 POTICE IS HEREBY GIVn talt tne nuhtifigtonM City Council will hold a' public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach , California , on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. Q=: Monday. September 19, 1986 TIM: 7 : 00 PM $, Appeal of planning Commission ' s Denial of Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 M11I Mat k r . O' Donnell Rogers S Hartley, Attys . , on behalf of Mark P. O 'Donnell 1d TZON: 503 Joliet Avenue (Northeast corner of Joliet Avenue and Delaware Street) P'tak9fimi: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s denial of a reque4t to permit exterior alteration to an existing single family dwelling that is non-conforming with regard to setbacks , parking , and building separation. The proposed project is exempt Class I Section 15301 and Class 5 Section 15305 from the provisions of California Environmental Quality Act . A cop} of the -proposed project and appeal are on file in the Department of Community Developwent 2000 Main Street , Huntington beach , CA l2648 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications , exhibits , and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City erk, 2000 Main street , Huntington beach, California , for inspection by the public . NUPT I BBC.' P S EACH CITY COUNC I L dt: Connie Brockway City Clerk Phone ( 724) 536-5604 Dated »Slid-2) /o-0.. /.1..• • Legal Notice City of Hurttinston ®each Office a! the City Clerk P. O. &,it 140 '. Huntinrlon bewh, CA 22648 .:` 1n1- 0! 1 f;u►trc�:,�r.•,: t<rncic/ � .1. y.�1S i J10 PLA 07 0j123571 09112/96 FIRST CLASS MAIL PLANI RETURN 10 SE-?"Ft A MOVED LEFT NO AOCKSS Publish �/•- - Kai o 1AIC MUM APPFA TO P N N A UF CONDITIONAL USE - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVLrX that'11% VIGINtIngl0n 11WHIA City Council will hold a public heeling in the Council Chamber at the Huntington eeach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and Consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below, LUM: Monday, September 19, 1988 T M: 7 : 00 PrS Appeal of planning Commission ' s Denial of Conditional Use Permit No . ee-31 &ITT,IQ=: Mark F . O' Donnell j I p�,ylz: Rogers 6 Hartley, Attys . , on behalf of Mark F . O ' Donnell : 503 Joliet Avenue (No: theast corner of Joliet Avenue and Delaware Street ) Appeal of Planning Commission ' s denial of a request to permit exterior alte:atton to an existing single w i non-conforming family dwelling that s non-confor nq with regard to setbacks , parking , and building separation. : The proposed project is exempt Class I Section 15301 and Class 5 Section 15305 from the provisions of California Environmental Quality Act . A copy of the proposed project and zppeal are on file in the Department of Community Devilapment 2000 Main Street , Huntington beach, CA 92648. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opiniora or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above . All applications , exhibits , and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Strep,L , Huntington beach , California , for inspection by the public . KVNT I NGTOM NZACH CITY COVOC I L By: Connie Brockway City Clerk Phone (724) 536-5404 Dated ( 1190d-2) ON CITY OF late NT°IN ON 13EACH 20DO MAIN STREET C'hLIFORNIA 926M OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October ; , 19118 Pogers h HartIvy A Lnw Corpni-ation 17111 Bench f3rnulevard, '',tits- 10 Hunt irlgt.orl Bench, rA 1.12647-11f)"49 The City Cnunc i 1 tt f the C t t y to t Hunt milt ot, f1ererh at i t regular meeting held SepLvmbf-r 19, 1`)Il8, gr:lt►terl yntlr appi-al relative to Comlitionni Usr Permit No. 88 {1 property Incrated at `,;li ,1nl iet Avenue, lhin appravnl war, ba ied Cal r e%. t,-,wd f ),nf111'lfIs .0 ld 6riml-nderl cor)(1 i t t ttn, , If �•tltt haVf' iIn'* tjtw.-A inwi re(jarding this matter, hlf•nat` rnll the Crvtvrmnity D"velopmr,nt t)Epal—tment fit Cont•+ie ETrnrt.,vtl�• CM1' Ci tv r l�r� cn :Rr Mar6 0' O-+r)rlf- 1 ' ftitl�Mrerie iNi�it 1 REQUES O FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Date Seatgmber 19 , 1988 Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Paul Cook, City Administrator Prepared by: Mike Adams , Acting Director , Community Deve lopmeW`f ,- Subject: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL OP CO PERMIT NO. 8 8�-31 6Y Ct • , 'espy Consistent with Council Policy? ( ( Yes ( ) New Policy or Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Fundinq Source, Alter nsents STD' Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal submitted by Rogers & Hartley, Attorneys , on behalf of Mark F. O' Donnell , to the Planning Commission ' s denial of Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 (Applicant : Mark F. O' Donnell ) . Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 is a request to permit exterior alteration to an existing single family dwelling located at 503 Joliet Avenue , that is non-conforming with regards to building setbacks , parking , and building separation. cQfMissiQn_-Action_and_-Re- .Qmmend.,osiQn__QL_AU9Us-t_.1� ..._�2�� ON MOTION BY SILVA AND SECOND BY KIRKLAND, THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERED APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PErd1IT NO . 88-31 , BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Silva , Kirkland NOES : Livengood , Leipzig , Ortega , Higgins ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION TO APPROVE FAILED 0!i MOTION BY LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY HIGGINS, THE PLANNING COKMISSION DENTED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-31 , WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE * AYES: LAvengood , Higgins , Leipzig , Ortega NOES: Silva , Kirkland ABSENT : Slates ABSTAIN : None 1 �s I!Qwt DE�: I . The proposed structure will not be compatible with adjacent properties because it encroaches within the front yard and exterior aide yard setbacks , as well as in the public right-of-way at the corner or Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue . 2 . Substantial alteration as proposed will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the v+. , tntty because the structure will preclude improvements within i-�i#_- public right-of-way, and will impede sight Iistance at ti.4 corner of Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue . 3 . Although the property is irregular in configuration , the size of the lot satisfies the minimum size of 2 , 500 square feet and exceeds the minimum frontage of 30 feet . Therefore , the conditional use permit is not necessary to prtzor-c a substantial property right . 4 . Encroachment into the required setback is not compatible with setbacks established for properties to the north , south, east and west and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upo. those properties . Staff ReCOMMCndation Staff recommends that the City Council upho:d the Planning Commission ' s denial of Conditional Use Permit No . 99-31 and deny the appr3al , based on the findings outlined above. AMWIS IS: The subject site is a 54 foot by 55 foot parcel located at the northeast corner of Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue. The existing structure iE an approximately 1 , 100 square foot single family dwelling constructed in 1920 , that does not conform with the standards of the Oldtown Specific Plan with regard to enclosed parking , building separation , and front yard , side yard and rear yard setbacks . The applicant is proposing to substantially alter the interior and exterior of the dwelling, including re-framing, re-roofing, electrical and plumbing improvements , changing interior walls , replacement of windows, removal of a porch and shed, and stuccoing of the exterior . Soction 9652 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance_ Code states that non-conforming structures shall not be enlarged or altered on the exterior in any manner unless the Planning Commission permits such alteration subject to epproval of a conditional use permit and conformance with all of thw following conditions : (1) That the alteration is necessary to secure added safety or reduce the fire hazard and/or improve the aesthetic appearance of the structure ' s architecture by bringing the design into greater conformance with the surrounding neighborhood . &CA - 9/19/88 -2- ( 1.243d) (2) That the alteration shall not increase the number of stories . (3) That regardless of any alterations, the floor area shall not exceed more than 10 percent of the floor area the structure contained at the time the structure was classified as non-conforming . (4) That a set of plants covering the alteration be submitted for approval as to location , design , color, and goneral architecture, and any work completed shall be in conformance with those plans . The applicant ' s requests to demolish a room of the house (excepting the foundation) and rebuild constitutes are alteration which falls under this section, and therefore a conditional use permit is required . Bon--ConfQxM ng .aspects of tha Site Although the subject dwelling is addressed on Joliet Avenue , the site frontage facing Delaware Street is narrower , and therefore considered by Code to be the front property line . The structure is set back three feet from the front property line on Delaware Street and one foot from the exterior side property line along Joliet Avenue . The Code requires a 15 foot front setback and a 5 foot exterior side yard setback . After the required street dedication for the corner radius, the main dwelling will not only encroach into the setbacks , but will also project approximately 50 square feet into the public aright-of--way and approximately 220 square feet into the required corner cutoff (see Attachment 4 ) . An existing one-car garage Is located at zero foot setback along the interior side and rear property lines in lieu of the required 5 feet and 7 . 5 feet , respectively . The one-car garage is also non-conforming because a two-car garage is currently required for single family dwellings . Lastly, the garage and dwelling unit are separated by approximately 3 feet., while the Code currently requires a 10 foot separation between buildings . Entitlement His-tau The following is a brief chronology of events concern4ng this application . K" 3 . 1268 . A building permit was issued by the Department of Community Develepment for a number of alterations to the existing structure. It was the understanding of the Planning staff that the exterior walls of the non-conforming structure would not be impacted , and therefore, the modifications would fall under Code Section 9652 (a) , which permits interior repairs/alterations and re-roofing for health and safety purposes . The planning staff member who Issued the permit indicated that the full set of plans was not presented at the Planning counter , and when questioned about the scope of work, the applicant indicated that no exterior alteration would occur. RCA - 9/19/88 -3 ( 1243d ) May 1 . 1988 . A building inspector ' s notice indicated that the work undertaken on the site did not match that shown on the plans , and that preliminary work had begun without benefit of building permits . May 5 , 1988 . A stop work order was issued by Land Use Enforcement for possible non-compliance with Code Section 9652 (b) , regarding exterior alteraticris to a non-conforming structure. The applicant was required to submit revised plana- to the plan checker for verification of setback anO property line dimensions . May 2. 1988 . A letter was sent from Mike Strange, Senior Planner, to Mark O ' Donnell , stating that a conditional use per-nit application would need to be filed based on the non-conforming provisions of the Code and the type of work to to undertaken ( i . e . complete reframing of the major room closest to Delaware) . ��,+1•r U, 988 . A 13tter was sent from Mike Adams , Planning Director , to Mark O 'Donnell , aSain stating the requirement for filing of a conditional use permit and conditional exception . (Staff has since determined that a conditional exception is riot required) . July 15` 198a . Application for Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 filed. Intent of Nojl-CotLformina Prfl -Isiom The expressly stated intent of the non-conforming provisions of the Code is to protect the public health , safety, and welfare (Section 9650) . This goal is acc,)mplished by restricting the improvement; of non-conforming structures to those modifications necessary for health and safety, and/or to bring the aesthetics of the structure into conformance with toe neighborhood . The provisions are intended to allow minor alterations that do not extend the reasonable expected life of the structure, and expressly prohibit such major alterations as increasing the floor area by more than 10 percent , or increasing the number of stories . within these limitations, the Planning Commission has discretion over requested exterior alterations . If major changes are proposed , then it is requited to bring the entire structure into conformance with the zoning rode . It is staff ' s determination that this proposal does not constitute a minor alteration in conformance with the intent of the Code . It involves re-roofing and subxtantial demolition and rebuilding of one room (except foundation) , significant floor plan changes which include relocation of the kitchen, dining room, living room, bedroom, and additional bathroom, and new plumbing and clectrical wiring . Moving the kitchen to the front room of the structure places it within three feet of the Delaware Street right-of-way. (See attachment No . 3 of Planning Commission staff report dated RCA ( 1343d) August He 1988) . ?he existing non-conforming portion of the houses within the setback and corner radius area is currently designated as one large front room. As one large room, it would be possible to modify it so as to conform with the setback requirements without affecting the current layout of tho house (see Attachment No . 7 of the RCA) . It would also allow partial expansion of the living room, dining and kitchen along Joliet meeting part of the applicant ' s objective to modernize the structure . This would bring the house into conformance with the setback requirements and be more compatible with the setbacks of adjoining parcels . Although the exterior appearance of the dwelling would undoubtedly be improved, the applicant ' s proposal essentially involves replacement of major portions of the structure, thus greatly increasing the expected life of the structure. Because of the extreme degree of non-conformity in the setbacks , staff feels that it Mould not be appropriate to make such alterations without obtaining adequata setback, . &d i cont Dayelgpmant Adjacent development consinte of single family homes and small multi--unit developments to the north , west and south, which have been developed to existing Oldtown front setback standards of 15 feet . To the east are older single family homes facing Joliet , which are set back approximately 6 feat from the front property line. The subject proposal would therefore be inconsistent with established front setbacks in the vicinity. Stet _Dedjsatioa and__Cglna Cut-OfI The Department of Public works requires that they applicant dedicate a 20 foot corner radius at the corner of. Joliet Avenue and Delaware Street , to be utilised for sidewalks and parkway improvements . There are currently no sidewalks abutting the site . As shown in the attached diagrrm, the existing structure encroaches approximately 50 square feet into this right-of-way area . The Code also requires , that no structures over 42 inches tall pan project into a triangular corner cut-off area formed by measuring 25 feet from the intersection of the front and exterior side property lines or their prolongation. This area is intended to provide adequate sight { distance from a vehicle stopped at the intersection. The existing structure encroaches approximately 220 square feet into the corner cutoff . The applicant ' s requested improvements would adversely impact public safety by extending the life of the structure such that attainment of public improvements and an adequate corner cut-off would be unreasonably delayed . Prior to the Planning Commission hearing, staff received a letter from a nearby resident who contends that a portion o the subject building was a store from 1920 to 1963 , and that gasoline tanks may still be located underground . Staff has been unable to confirm thecae allegations through available records . /•1, w w / d As an alternative to denial of the site plan, the City Council may wish to consider approval of a modified sits plan, which would allow a portion of the non-conforming structure to remain, and allow for additions which meet Code. :'hose portions of the structure that encroach into the corner cutoff and the public right-of-way should be. moved . Additionally, the front yard and exterior side yard netbacks should be made to more closely conform with setbacks in the tmm"iate vicinity . Staff does net feel that these modifications would tender the lot unusable because the lot does exceed the minimum area of 2 , 500 square feet required by the Old town Specific Plan . The site is 2 , 910 square feet before the corner dedication, .end 2 , 8a4 square feet after the corner dedication . The atite angle corner taut--off restricts another 226 . 5 square feet of the lot , leaving 2, 657 . 5 square feet of lot, area outside the radius and corner cut-off area . The unusut±l size and shape of the lot compared to others in the vicinity may impose a land--related hardship, and therefore, there may be some grounds for a conditional exception (variance) to some required setbacks, providing the dwelling did not encroach into the public right-of-way or site-angle area impacting put,lic safety. It is possible that the building square footage removed in those areas could be located an a second level . The Code does not prohibt a second story if t:aM structure is brought into conformance with the code, or is non--conf o r mi nS oMly as to setbacks . for these reasons , staff does not feet that denial or modification of the applicant ' s request would preclude all development on the site . AT►AM : This project is exempt class 1 Section 15301 and Class 5 Section 15305 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act . Not applicable. The City Council may approve Conditional Use Permit No. 88-31 with findings for approval , subject to a modified site plan which more closely conforms with Code roquirements . : 1 . Area Map 2 . Appeal Letter dated August 24 , 1988 3 . Staff Report dated August 16 , 1986 4 . Article 965, Huntington beach Ordinance Code S . Litter from Charles clack dated August 11 , 1988 6. Graft P: anning Cossaission Minutes dated At;gust 16 , 1968 7 . Alternative trite plan RCA - 9/19/88 -6- ( 12430) i Yl a l 1 M 1 t l j 1__11_1 L--__l l_A6L11SId t • w 1 ! w: t� �+Iaaa��•� l..C2 r� ' 40 �- '•`"'wog r �lRe 1 !t wt ■t w tw (�[ O f•fcw� M _ cr + ' ,,11s t M we ■• wt wt w 0 -p 0 7—-0— ! • +. t � � 0 - jFj •p! •t w• 'M 1 �� o o'ro'no me —AIR oiro 1 .� . , . ` f l •� 1 tS 111 11 r r� — 11! AI �• ,. OLD 7ECJFIC )i ; M �� , ..�tj ;s CF- . .. .... �= - duos �t M w• w) Cw R! F � I IJ��J '• ! Iwo+w�1�w]�L� I �• �I Z I� '..__IJ t / 1.- I' tf ' 1 -}" �1 N1 ' 641 - I no -_ � ;.`�� ' � � ��•�-----... FA arcLl / •� j ;"49 ./ •. V_ �.1 �=-- - * r• it i. \ �-- - !1 t I+IMiw_S*2N IIMACA' ftA StM OW1310N R[tE 111� Clt 1 tIICR'IK ROGERS 6. HARTL.EY city of lr ti • A.% C Oft r+ONa r,q.. S P aRowata L tlt �[qf )i „r v::,. An1J.[VIA"r), :: If r I �yl♦ �� LC11 J r+AATLry ORCwO[ [ V ILL-AsASQN ►4UNTiNGTON PSCAC►+ CALiIpNflr♦ DL'f 47•0}OD9 AA•,�H Pt LO+D i111 �11st. TO: CON:N11' BROl:KWA'i , t:1,ERY, t:E' T111: (:IT'i C)F'' HU?;:'INGTON BEACH , Pam 'ru ' HI-_' CIT'i Ct)UNCIi. OF THE CIT'i OF HUNTIN7GTON BL•'ACH : Ro Appl i C a t l )I'i : o- \'l i'r(1 : t lc,r1�11 t �t: irl:rl;il L t;i) • gy- 3 1 , . :11-, _,03 .' ,A let Street . 1lunr i ncltcm 13va.•ti, C liforriia L' : �::; tl:la i.it_•IIt 1 ('III•-11 . . F'L LASE AiA: that Apj� '1 lcijnt , Maz-1: F. O ' Donticl i , � := zr;r, t.11- �i,'c-i :i � �+11 cif the Planninr; '.'otunxssion of AIL-,; i t: , 1 �) �+ '� , L.F'`il'.' 1.1}t� his App11cat. ion for a Conditional V:3(: t ' ' 1I:}111-0v0' tilt, 111,0perty locatt_d at 503 Joliet S,trLet , is tht_• S 15`_t . 00 fee . ur OFF F•'AC:S A. itppIicatit Is 11 11'1111tInot :1 B isc11 burti tic ssmar: , tavtl of the sub)t'c't. that iri lucat"'(1 at -it., t t.Vl'Ilt'I' O .4111ot. and D'_-11tkitr'_' . ?'ht sllb'w :t urort' rt'.' l .'; a '_ 4 x 5� foot parct'i t'F;'tt .. ,... L :;"c; d'.; ., 5114,31 V ft:r;l. ly h(.7rtc , A approxisntttely 1 , 100 squar t C�bt 1I',I tUtF ttt F:l' ,It as :` iXty (60 ) yerI i'S v :.ti . t�Lt.�i !lt Ale c a:i Ti 1: 1 1s a I ttoi c!atv"I August 19 , 19a8 , f t :;11111(I that ---,it lid 1): •t l' i.;: W..1. Ll..1' 1. t1 :' u ':. U : OIL.L' F- I L)p': r t}' ill it Miry t, i 1 '.+ t3a tt '' attilchud urider Tab +1� . It i. tc UI1CMIt_1'UV',.'I ',I_'Li t.11itt It that t li•.'.t' , the p:"t)puz ty was an (.tt:Fiur�_' aria I't1v :,uF, t i110p. rtr• was and is a pro.-v)' I stIng sion-coo,. clrr}in(: 11St' ;it ' he tint• the City adupted the Oldt>:own .5��t'ciflc' I'1i.n, and is it_,L ,2t.l`(! iti Uistrl, 't. 1 _if the Oldtown arc:fl , illU.; a mal., i :; attached ;1= i`.111 13 . L' The App. : t:,ant appI iud fov it F)U1 IcFing permit oil May 3 , 1988 wittl p1.::r1:I Lh-it. clearly showed chatlges to the exterior wa11S . lli su p131i1% clt!arly tit at.v and depict where the exterior walls were to be lucated . Those plans ar`' t• ':tached as Tab 14 and those plans were stamped approved by the rlanning Department of the City of Huntington Beach. The ,;pp) ',r:ant also oubmitted a narrative description of the proposee. improvementsa , which ;ap\cif- iCal ly referred to :.he exterior wal. s , which rcirrative is dt- I August 74 , 1988 .,.. Page 2 Ip tached as Tab 05. At times and places the word 'wall +;' was stricken from that narrative and replaceu with the word "doors" j by pe;rsuns whose handwriting it% unknown to Applicant and the de-letiun of the word "walls' from that document war; not din- j cuve:red by Applicant �:,:til August 16 , 1988 . Applicant also submitted the Plot F'laul tht: Proposed Floor Plans , and a render- ing depicting the prc)L:c:t or, completion . attached as Tabs 160 07 and 18 , respu ; :ively. Additiunielly , Applicant submitted struc- tured engineering calculationb uaterd May 3 , 1988 to :show the stability of the propos_-d project , ca copy of which is attached he,;etu as TaL $9 . E . The application for a building permit , Tab t5 , was appruved and a buildir.9 hermit war,, issued on May 3 , 1988 , and a copy of that permit is •ittachcd as Tab 010 . A limited amount of work , principal71 dernol ition , occuL-rt•d prior to the ibsuance Of the permit , as it result cf a misundLrsLandinq by the Applicant ' s contractcr . F. Applicant ri li(,d uf)c-,r, the issuance of said build- ing permit and throutih the use ui a cicw of eight ( 8 ) workmen , after tht- permit wab issued , proce.ede:d to cause: a Fort. ior. of the work contemplated by the project to take place on 1Kby 3 , 1988 , May 4 , 1986 , and May 5 , 1988 . Photographs depicting the par- tially completed work , as of Mal• 5 , 198b , are. attached as Tate 111 . G . On May 5 , ? 9880 a Stop work ordCr was issued by the City ' s Land tt,V F11forct:1:.Vnt Una t for an alleged nun- cornpliance with tiuntir►ytor, Beach Code 5 9654 'L) , And demand waa tuddC cr. Applicant tc l uvlse his plans; in a wry that would require destruction of most of tht� wi:!•l: that had Lt_(:n done , and also cause Applicant to build it btL•ut-ture that was; not ubable. The Stop Wort; Order i:; attached as Tab 11:. 0 11 . oil May �5 , 1988 , Apl)lictsrtt war notified by letter by Mike Strange• , the city ' :; Senior Platinet , that a Conditions: Use Permit Mould he rlcr. ded , and that 1vtter is attached a7 Tab 013 . 1 . on .,,uly 15 , 1988 , the App: ic:atiun for Conditional Use Permit was filed , which application is set forth in Tab 114 . Notice was given to 56 neighbors , whose names are suet forth its the mailing list attached heretu as Tab t15 , and none of those persons objected to the issuance: of it Conditional Use Permit. J . On August 16 , 1988 , the Staff . Report was filed j with the planning Commission , which report is met forth in Tab 416 . Said report is silent as zu whether the project secures added safety and admits that the project involves new electrical wiring , which teduces fire hazards , and the report also admits I LJN9/007 August 241 1988 4P Page 3 that the aeuthetic appearance of the structure will be improved . Said rep!)rt contains no information as to whether the pro ject ' s design is in greater conformance: with the surrounding neighbor- V hood , but instead focuses solely upon the ininerdiate:ly adjacent development . Said r:jport recommended denial of the application, arguing that Code: S 9652 (b) implieydly prohibits alterations that extend t1W Lvasonable life of the: structure . Also , the Oldtown Specific Plan contains greater set:-back and corner cut-off requirements than were required when the structure Was built. The Applicant ' :; approved l•lans had no impact on the existing set- backs : and pruvided a greater corner cut-uff than before. , but the: Staff recommended aen :al of the Application for a Conditional Use P,urrdt because the structure did not fully confo:.m to the current requirements for net-back_ and corner cut-Dffs . No finding , how- ever , way. made that there would not be greater conformance with the surrouneiine? neighborhocd . K . On August lb , 1986 , Applicant made an uncontro- verted showing before the Planninga Commission as follows : 1 . The• site war, a fvrt,;#_t eyesui-e , and the proj- CCt would beautify the area . Denial would result in litigation c0stitig the taxpayers over $:'.00 , 000 . 00 for the; uwr.c•r ' damages . 3 . Denial would result in the structure: continu- ing to be a blight on the Neighborhood . i . f�cni it would re' :ult ill loss of public vorifi- dence_t in the s;•steri. 5 . Approval was favored Ly all persons who spoke to the planning Commission and they only concern of the owner of the adjacent property on Joliet was me:terly that the structure of the garage wall cin the sit#..- be stabilized , which was an accept- able_ condition to Applicatt . b . Approval of a Ccnditiunal Use Permit would save: the taxpayu s at least $ 2100 , 000 . 00 in daniagets for which there City would otherwise- be liaLlu . 7 . Approval would enhance property values it: the neighburhuod ar,a maintain public confidences in the rystem. 8 . It was not feasible to fully cuwply with tit* Oldtown Specific Plan because ut the limited size of the lot and because the lot could not be consolidated with adjacent and im - proved properties owned by third persons . L. On August 16 , 1988 , the Planning Comastssion stet ct 7 t 00 p.m. , and after 11 : 00 p.m. the matter was heard before a LJN9/007 2CP I August 24 , 1986 � Pale 4 tired and divided commission. The minority opinion was that it was unfair to the Applicant for the project to be stopped after a permit had been issued . The principal arguments offered in f.avcr of denial was that one Commissioner personally did not like the proposed floor plan , which is a matter of personal taste and outside the scope of the jurisdiction of the Planning C'omnission. Another Commissioner who oppoaed the application slid not under- stand why the: Applicant would want to rc:hrabilitate the structure . The Staff tried to argue that Applicant could build a two ( 2 ) story structures however , it was pointed out that the Cody: pro- hibits an increarse in the nu:nbcr of stories . Staff al :;o triad to argue that the flan cuu ld bey re de signed , but the lot i s too small to do so, and it is not ff_�asikalt: tri recluse thou (.xiuLing structure as requested , because it is ugly 1 , 100 squate feet . At no time was the denial baULU on a failure to meet the 6tatutory require- ments of Code S 9652 . The vc)tt., to c:eny was 4 - 2 , and the denial of the applicatiu:t is attached as gat: t 1 , . Ill . THI: 1PPLICATTON FOR A CONDITIONAL USE FER. n, SHOULD BE GRANTED FOR THL VOLLOWING RF::%S0t:S: A. THE _ APPLICATION MLT THE EXPRESS CRITERIA OF JiUr;iINGTON BEACli CODE 5 965� ; Said Code section only contain foul- ( 4 ) requirements , which ar(, an follows : I 1 . No i tic:rcase_ in the nucit)cr e. : bturics , and hLru tteerc %as no thanes , i,b the prier ::tructurc and the: proposed structure were both ( 1 ) 2 . r;u inure than a ten percent ( 10% ) irc:rease in thu size: ul tho f le .c>r area , and herd three was a slight duc:rease , and no i ncrva;,t: in size_ . 3 . Issuance of a rjilding permit , which occurred oil 111ey 3 , 1988 . 4 . Satis: actiein of an one ( 1 ) of the following three ( 3) czito_ria .(,Jative to the a itect of they project : a . Securing added safety , and the proposed p, ject met thin cr it -ria cif affect and there is no contrary finding ; b. Reducing fire hazard, and both the pzoposte:ci t;er+ wl ring and the proposed new roof show that this Criteria of effect was also meet; c . Improved aesthetics that bring the projesct ' s design into 'yr+euter conformance Frith thtt surrounding LJN9/007 Auquat 24 , 1988 j Pale 5 neighborhood . " Here, Staff admitted that aesthetics would be improved , and instead of focusing on the. " surrounding neighbor- hood, " Staff limited its focun to the immediately adjacent prop- erties , and the one that was on Joliet has the same front yard suet-back as the exiutiaq structure. Additionally, Applicant , through slides , established tha� in the surrounding neighborhood , there were numerous other properties that were also pre-existing and non-conforming uses that did not meet the Oldtown Specific Plan ' s set-back and corner cut-off i cqui remen!s. Attached at Tab 018 is a lint of comparable properties, photographs of those properties , and a Wrap showing the lucation of those properties in relation to the situ in question . Those documents and Photo- graphs clearly establirilt that the: proposed project is in "greater conformance" with the surruurtriiijg n(.-i(Thborhood. Applicant also established that they corner cut-off area would be increased at the site . so as to enhance sight distance: , resulting in greater confurmanc#2 with those corn_.rs that meet the current currtur cut- off requirements . A phutogr :,pr showinq the: enhanced sight distance and the stop ,; idt, at the corner in question is attached as Tab 019 . H . .,VEt. IF THERE 10 ARGUMENT AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES THE "SURROUNDING NUGMRN00D AND AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES GREATER LONFORMANCE , THAT IS BESIDE THE F0111T, BECAUSE APPLICANT MET TWO 2) OF THE THREE ( 3 ) ALTERNATL CRITERIA AS TO EFFECT , AND ONLY NEEDED TO MEET ONE (1 ', OF THOSE CRITERIA OT QUALIFY FOR A CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT. A, noted aLGVL , Applicant clearly :yet at least two (2) of the thcef: ( 3 ) alternative: criteria as to the effect of the project , and as such , Mar, entitled to the issuance of a condi- tiunal u&c perr,it C . 'rIIERL ARE NO ADDITIONAL " IMPLIED" _ CRITERIA To TSSUANCE OF A C00W. 'IONAL USE PERMIT, AND NEITHER STAFF NU Tilt PI.ANNINC COMMISSION HAS THE POWER TO ADD VNAUTHORI ZED CRITLR1A1 PARTICULARI.Y� O..N,A K6".TROACTIVE BASIS, ONCE A GUILUING PERMIT HAS 13EEN ISSUED . I . As noted al.ave: , Staff now claimed that it was the " implied i.nte ijt" ut the City Council to p.rahibi t improvements that prolong a structure ' s useful life, and there is no reason- able basis for attempting to create that criteria bc-:ause, if the Council wanted to do so, it would have clone no when it passed Huntington Beach Code S 9652 . Since the Council did not do so, there is no basis for the Staff to attempt to invent additional criteria riot required by the Ordinance , especially on a retro- active basis after the Applicant relied on the issuance of a building permit. L.TH9t007 'J&A August 24 , 1968 Page 6 1 2 . It is obvious thbt the creation of a non- existent criteria is ar attempt to overcome the fact that a building pernciL was issued and relied upon , and it is simply unfair to change: the rules after the fact. . Murcove:r , only the C:c,unci l has the power to an►end Huntington Deach Code 5 5692 , and neither Staff nor the Planning Commission gave the authority tQ d(i 60 by their own fiat. 4 . Moreuver ,, no governs-m!ntisl budy can pass retroac:tivu legislation , tccausu the U . S. '.onstitution prohibits EX post facto laws . D. RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMEU7 REQUIRES TEE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAI. USE: PERMIT. 1 . Heio , the prior subject wab ai► r_-yescire , and if a hermit i :; granted , the site wit : be beautified , which is in the bent ititerusts of tht, community. t►dditiuttally , the Applicant is willing to build it sidrN.ilk on Loth JUliut and Delaware , at Applicant ' s uwn rxpoi,.-;(- , and duulcate the right of way as a condition cf develupnic nt , to further Lc-autify the neighborhood . Z . Here , the owner' s only iecuurse is to either obtain. a conditional use permit ut sue: th(.. City for a $200 ,000 . 00 loss , and the taxpayers ' money shuuld not Cc wasted when it cntc be saved by i:;suanc.c of a permit . A!; such , thure is no basis for Staf i te, argue: that the: ry i ti " nc deprivation" of a Substantial pxoperty right . . lie:re: , they }- ro-)vct will upgrade the appearance of the nciyhborhuod , and bring greater pride of ownership and alues to the rircrcc , which is also in the: bust enhanced property %• interests of the c onimunity . 4 . Ifere , issuance of a conditional ubu permit will re-affirm public coniidenc-e in the intcgri.ty of the system, by showing that the Council does not leave _,wnux b high arid dry whe:r, Staff has it belated dnd after-the-fact change of mind . E. ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT HAS PUBLIC SUPPORT. 1 . It iu uricuntroverted that tiv citizens opposed the application and the only cuncern was %bout the garage wall , and Applicant was willing to remedy that condition. 2 . Heree the project has the approval of at least Fight citizens, whose letters of support are attached at Tab 020t and more will be presented. LJH91007 August 24 , 1988 Page 7 4 . CONCLUSION: The Council should balance the,: pros and cons of this situa- tion, and when it does, Applicant renpectfully bubmits that the conbiderations of fair play and aesthetic improvvments that upgrade the Oldtown area , in the case of pre-existing and non- conforming uses , are. clLarly in the public' s best interest , and take a dominant priority over a policy that favors the mainte- nance of eyesores , the wasting of taxpayers ' money, and the frustration of the reasonable expectations of our citizens . As such , this Application should be granted . I'lease give written notice to this offi,:#, of the date , time and hlacu when this appeal will be Yeard , and alao dive the same notice to Mark O ' Dorinell , tht� Applicant , at 2ZO Main Street# Iiuntingtoii Beach , caiifurriia 92648 . Respectfully Submitted , � F?(aGEFiS a FlAFiTLF:2' , A I,aw Corporation ALX -iby: HARTLE , ttorr►cy for Applicant I.J11i jt At tachmr!nts cc : Maycr John Erskine Mayor Pro Terr Tom Maya Councilman/Counci lwcrian: Weis Bannister Ruth Finley Pvter Green Jack Kelly Grace W i nche l l Mark O ' bonnel l - Applicant Mary Kern - Owner LJ09/007 huotWgton bew.h dopwtnant of CommWty d Ff Jt Epokit TO: Planning Commission FROM: Community Development DATE: August 16 , 1988 SUBJECT: CONDIT!,nNAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-31 &MM& : Mark F . O 'Donnell D&JE CCE=ZD: P.O. Box 329 August 1 , 1988 Bunt . Beach, CA 92648 M"DA!r0 X—nQCESSINGDATE: Qom$ : Mary Kerr October 1 , 1988 2407 Service Road Ceres , CA 95307 ZQ.g : Oldtown Specific Plan District 1 P140E52 : To permit exterior alteration to an existing GENERAL PLU: Medium single family dwelling Density Residential that is nonconforming with regard to setbacks , LX,I, II,KG USE: Single family parking , and building home separation . &C.R QC: 2 , 884 sq. ft . (net) j,.40,gM 503 Joliet (northeast corner of Joliet and Delaware) 1. a syca ST ,D ACTION : Deny Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 with findings . A, b GENEML INEORMTIQN : The subject site is a 54 foot by 55 foot parcel located at the northeast corner of Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue. The existing structure is an approximately 1 , 100 square foot single family dwelling constructed in 1920 , that does not conform with the standards of the Oldtown Specific Plan with regard to enclosed parking, building separation, and front Yard , side Yard and rear yard setbacks . The applicant is proposing to substantially alter the interior and exterior of the dwelling, including re-framing, re--roofing, electrical and plumbing improvements . Changing interior walls, replacement of windows , removal of a porch and shed, and stuccoing of the exterior . Section 9652 of the Huntington ftach I i i �s -- � _acre. _ '�fo.rSYlY�r` -_ ..aar....w�.M•' Ordinance Code states that non-conforming structures shall not be enlarged or eltered on the exterior in any manner unless the Planning Commission permits such alteration subject to approval of a conditional use permit and conformance with the following conditions : ( 1) That the alteration is necessary to secure added safety or reduce the fire hazard and/or improve the aesthetic appearance of the structure' s architecture by bringing the design into greater conformance with the surrounding neighborhood . (2 ) That t:1e alteration shall not increase the number of. stories . ( 3 ) That regardless of any alterations , the floor area shall not exceed more than 10 percent of the floor area the structure contained at the time the structure was classified as non-conforming . (4 ) That a set of plans covering th3 alteration be submitted for approval as to location, design, color , and general architecture, and any work completed shall be in conformance with those plans . The applicant ' s requests to demolish a room of the house (excepting the foundation) and rebuild constitutes an alteration which falls under this section, and therefore a conditional use permit is required . Sit , GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Medium Density Residential ZONE: Oldtown Specific Plan-District 1 LAND USE : Single family residences KP:th Q f -s biac t J?x P.Q_11 Y : GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION : Medium Density Residential ZONE : Oldtown Specific Plan- District 1 LAND USE: Multi -family residential 4-4 0 ENV I RO MENT The proposed project is exempt Class 1 Section 15301 and Class 5 Section 15305 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act . 5. 0—C4 STAL _STATU Not applicable. dA_._.8OKYELOMT STAB: Not applicable . i I I I staff Report - 8/16,086 =CASb (ladid ) I � The site is located within the Oidtown Specific Plan-District 1 . Thi following is a toning conformance chart comparing thu applicant ' s prnposal to Oldtown Specific Plan standards : AaQ"QA IsjLLQ RCguired Pror dyed 9130 . 2 Min . Parcel Si-e 2 , 500 sq . ft . 2 , s84 sq. ft . Min. Frontage 25 ft . 54 ft . 9130 . 3 Max . Density 1 unit 1 unit Max . FAR 1 : 1 . 39 : 1 9130 . 4 Max . Building Height 30 ft . except 11 ft . (single 22 ft . within story) 25 f t . of f rcnt and rear property lines 9130 . 5 Max . Site Coverage 50% 45% ( 1 , 442 sq . ft . ) ( 1 , 298 sq . ft . ) 9130 . 6 Front Setback (Delaware) I Dwelling 15 ft . 3 ft . * Garage 22 ft . 28 f t . 9130 . 7 Side Setback Interior 5 ft . 11 . 5 (house) 0 ft . * (garage) Exterior (Joliet ) 5 ft . 1 ft . * (house) 9130 . 8 Rear Setback 7 . 5 ft . 11 ft . (house) 0 ft . * (garage) 9130 . 9 Open Space 600 sg . it . '723 sq . ft . 9130 . 13 (c) Building Separation i0 f t . 3 ft . * 9606(b) (3) Parking 2 spaces within 1 space within garage garage, 1 open tandem* 9770(e) Corner Cut-Off No structure house encroaches* 25 ft . trinagle over 47 in . high approximately 220 sq . ft . ahzisting nun-conferming (:j • �c stag waMp�rt - iJlili� -�- t j4�i� i I ■-d ■ d �ela� �YT'TRE : Mot applicable . j ��D Mj�� A1�ID �►MSi.V�i T c Although the subject dwelling is addressed on Joliet Avenue* the site frontage facing Delaware Street is narrower , and therefore considered by Code to be the front property line. The structure is set back three feet from the front property line on Delaware Street and one foot from the exterior side property line along Joliet Avenue. The Code requires a 15 foot front setback and a 5 foot exterior side Yard setback. . After the required street dedication for the corner radius, the main dwelling will not only encroach into the setbacks, but will also project approximately 50 square feet into the public right-of-way and approximately 220 square feet into the required corner cutoff (see Attachment 4 ) . An existing ore-czar garage is located at zero foot setback along the interior side and rear property lines in lieu of the required 5 feet and 7 . 5 feet , respectively. The one-car garage is also non-conforming because a two-car garage is currently required for single family dwellings . Lastly, the garage and dwelling unit are separated by approximately 3 feet , while the Code currently requires a 10 foot separation between buildings . i EDIitlement ' story The following is a brief chronology of events concerning this application . May 3 . 198a . A building permit was issued by the Department of Community Development for a number of alterations to the existing structure. It was the understanding of the Planning j staff that the exterior walls of the non-conforming structure wr,uld not be impacted , and therefore , the modifications would fall under Code Section 9652(a) , which permits interior repairs/alterations and re- roofing for health and safety purposes . Kay 4 . 1905 . A building inspector ' s notice indicated that the work undertaken on the site did not match that shown on the plans , and that preliminary work had begun without benefit of building parmiis . May S,,_ 1988 . A stop work order was issued by Land Use Enforcement for possible non-compliance with Cod* Section 9652(b) , re�, irding exterior alterations to a non-conforming structure . The applicant was required to submit revised plans to the plan checker for verif.icdtion of setback and property line dimensions . Cii Staff Report - 0/16/88 -4 - t10�74) 0 sear 2s- 1621 A letter was sent from Nike strange, ieaioc rlanae►c, to Mark fl'Donnell , stating that a conditional use permit application would need to be filed based on the anon-conforming provisions of the Code and the type of Mork to be undertaken ( i .e . complete refraining of the major room closest to Delaware) . July 12, JOIN . A letter was sent from Mike Adams, Planning Director, to Mark O' Donnell, again stating the requirement for filing of a conditional use permit and conditional exception. (Staff has deice determined that a conditional exception is not required) . July 1„5, 1988 . Application for Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 filed . Intent of Non-Conforming Provisions The intent of the non-conforming provisions of the Code is to protect the public health , safety, and welfare by restricting the Improvement of non-conforming structures to those modifications necessary tc_ health and safety, and/or to bring the aesthetics of the structure into conformance with the neighborhood . The provisions axe intended to allow minor alterations that do not extend the re , sonable expected life of the structure, and expressly prohibit such major alterations as increasing the floor area by more than 10 percent , or increasing the number of stories . within these limitations , the Planning Commission has discretion over requested exterior alterations . it is staff ' s determination that this proposal does not constitute a minor alteration in conformance with the intent of the Code . It involves re-rooting and substantial demolition and rebuilding of one room (except foundation) , relocation of the kitchen, dining room, living room, bedroom, and bathroom, and new plumbing and electrical s wiring . Although the exterior appearance of the dwelling would undoubtedly be improved, the proposal essentially involves replacement of major portions of the structure, thus greatly increasing the expected life of the structure. Because of the extreme degree of non-conformity in the setbacks , staff feels that it would not be appropriate to make such alterations without obtaining adequate setbacks . AaAcdnt W0102ment Adjacent development consists of single fAmily homes and small multi-unit developments to the north, west and south, which have been developed to existing Oldtown front setback standards of 19 feet . To the east are older single family homes facing Joliet, which are set back sppr021ct4t*l7 i feet from the front property line. The subject proposal w.enld therefore be inconsistent with established front Setbacks in the vicinity . 1 i staff 1169oct - t/16/84 i strut JWleation and.Carragr.Cut-Of f The Department of public works requires that the applicant dedicate a 20 foot corner radius at the corner of Joliet Avenue and Delaware Street * to be utilized for sidewalks and parkway improvements . There are currently no sidewalks abutting the site. As shown in the attached diagram, the existing structure encroaches approximately 50 square feet into this right-of-way area . The Code also requires that no structures over 42 inches tall ctn project into a triangular corner cut-off area formed by measuring 25 feet from the intersection of the front and exterior side property lines or their ralon stion . ':his area is intended to provide adequate night P 9 P q 9 distance from a vehicle stopped at the intersection . The existing structure encroaches approximately 220 square feet into the corner cutoff . The applicant ' s requested improvements would extend the life of the structure such that attainment of public improvements and an adequate corner cut-off would be unreasonably delayed . q y As an alternative, the Planning Commission may wish to consider approval of a modified site plan , which would allow a portion of the existing non-conforming structure to remain . Those portions of the structure that encroach into the corner cutoff and the public right-of. -way should be removed . Additionally. the front yard and exterior side yard setbacks should bo made to more closely conform with setbacks in the immediate vicinity . It is possible that the building square Footage removed in these areas could be located on a second level , or 1n the rear of the site if additional open space were provided via a second rioor/roof deck . i h?.L0 SES.. NDAUQN : Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Conditional Use Permit No . 86 -31 with the following findings : FLN12I NGS FOR UN_IAL : 1 . The proposed structure will not be compatible with adjacent properties because it encroaches within the front yard and exterior side yard setbacks , as well as in the public right-of-way at the corner or Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue . 2 . Substantial alteration as proposed will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity because the structure will preclude improvements within the public right-of-way ► and will impede sight distance at the corner of Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue . 3 . Althouth the property is irregular in configuration , the size of the lot satisfies the minimum site oZ 2, 500 square foot and exceeds the minimum frontage of 30 feet . Therefore, the � conditional use permit is not necessary to preserve a substantial property right . stiff Report - 8/16/68 # . ftcroaehrent into the requ i raw notback is not compatible with setbacks estaLlished for properties to the north, south, east ' and west and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon those properties . 1142 -1►La NATIVE ACTION: The planning Commission may approve Conditional Use Permit no . Ile--sl with reduced room size with findings and conditions of approval . 1 . Area map 2 . Site plan, floor plans , elevations provided by applicant 3 . previous and proposed floor plans + . Site plan with adjacent development , curb radius and corner cutoff S. building Permit dated May 3 , 1985 6 . Building Inspector notice dated May 4 , 1985 7 . Stop Work Order dated May 5, 1988 a . Letters Erom planning staff dated May 25, 1988 , and July 12 # 1988 SH: LP : kla ilteff Ne"rt {- cz at as al ato an at in at At ok IMP at 96 so al ir OF .. . �a "• SPECIFIC` i1 M .• CCF -o PLANS RICT TWO M•• ■� ��� J•' 1 r!Pogo ' *1 ` ' • - ••/ } Arm— Ir Sam Am ! P) c.1 no Ok Olt �!' nt iow 04 N (f CF-E ni IL 0�l � _1 � _ � � it a-�-�"/f,- � � f •, + ... 4m ` 1 as IF as MUNT GION IWACH PLAAMW40 Df'111SOON 1� I' 0 1 s J PM a Ik S40WA •ram AlsomM as ODWR ,,,,., Nona.*O+R w-m. vm. W49N MAIM*WON"MO "ADO* 0-1 2"a w1r Mr.�itONKS"w owl w w +• wMw► ' "UM loom i+�s . M► ONE' «ww OA600" Ift1ft. +1tr+rs .ow""a UMM.M ill~-Vrlr W �, �� 1•a.r�rtl.�r�rMr r�nrt,� i *A ors MS�wwr I •• W-d' Mom. t.,r• WOW 3.,`• • OLLw L*J I • OAXW 101430 db •. 1 ' 1 1 I 006 I M T ,., ..+. b r } fir,.,. 1 �'•o•'no' '��'`.•A.•Q. `.,`� ''•`• ��•`. 1 • so.e� ...•.r. 4� mam•on& ..,. w..i• � � .� ..r. arm Q �hK� Is4 1'•O• R'•O' 11' Ir' M�•O� ,.,r frWM i IT— *a- IOWAw uwam& MfAWNMMR rw4w4mft POPIOMMOUNft1 MrMI IM. wow A GIAPM 0%MMrA War daGNMOMMO VWAPGW Mid *ft rim►MiM VAP"IMSIOM ~ IRAA .. ,�avi.,b..a • '��' ,;�:•fir'.•�,ro'. '�d�N � ��fi1'Ai��iflYS�w �r M� �9 I f � f ' a�w h MDRZVM � z w -of n. EN F"T RPCM Lllv*(,� WINN& PREVIOU FLDOR PLAN Fp M 'N r �I M;DcObW RXOR FL-M .�- 4 � � AD3A`ENY i5 S� K db i r 2 r', i h ' lt�l0" r; woo on.i f r as wm JOLIET AVE. 1 , l r� ilia jkrassl Sal MI!! Tress si Lst ti 240" ii -- -- -- - LIIfl. fvllsiss Us• u0 one" CswtretteFT a RINT all$ iw0 GualsaGTGs! . 240T 392TICL �►� r CM3 CA j .71k:4.-� brahttest or Cagisssf bi f = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------�' 'Caatiastaa MIAMI 11OsT NO ! kOCF.a[MOME 2 MGb-bkh%1+G :aLL1,a00 I -,.•• it y ALL YOa b1bbM,MOVL 1 WLk, DLKO jlOkAGL L rONCh ,..: . j � RY111a3Y:111e3 7 >tC � �� >i�.ftl Uvin! Ct.3larlaa ! frals�a�iow 2000G i Garsaa ao.Fawtllws t ll.ila-Coen ;J, psesrl�tl Gaa Grp$ - k} toaalr-Typo IN t)oa.Loal . 'ate-� I - Ione: rs:StDt �� Cesare Case e)e b1Ca.Useae 3tL tarklns lbs. -'' f t1625106 Lstlaal Ceaetel foraLt? aO tii1'..1 -Appl.99se 05/0}/0� Lanauaa YN ^ -05101/bl' auth. CH G ---5JO Jab -- •r --------------------------------------------------------------- PC PC ieeelpt f ;•" Issues 6MG - 65/03/Eb Iamoo ?eaelpt s 431*72 ;. 1.*, ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --• Ir3PlCTIOs fEF3 ' Deaerlpt:en soounl Doaor/ptiow Asouwt ----------- ------ ----------- ------ � ��• Inapeation too 161.6L �SS~ ' frocetstoa 10.DL rianchoci► t04.S4 -j� Lsarary C.GG 1 Conaervat!%n toaolcy 0.00 Iotal !es 296.S9 =v MtL��a7'�Y 'V •�-.ti Iwr Ow I w--.r a--I.{ Oftuft r..ft.l ..- ...... .r.... ... ......r.sr% ti w 4P ow ~memo" .r..r...-r.�..•rW.-•. •.•• . •rr•r..•..• rr . rrr r. •rr •ram-- - wr w Ir.n. I-- • •• awi.�.•.-.�-••-•r.•r•-r.r,w•w t. r...-• •� w+r .Fw•4.0 010,001•"D• ~4mw1w a- r .w.•.•.r--r- wwr•..�i..-Wv 64MMOR•.leaow Ij I /.•i.r �__-..._.•.•+.� .- - - --- - - - - r row wa rr.ftr 1-1 a....1 40 w•a,w.•am mar"a 1 r O..r...••.•-r r..r-• - r f • *-~ •r.rr •.. MI •r. r w. 4. 0.0"W.•r► i' a wr.w-�•r r r-•-�.�..•-r.-�. ••^-'- w,•" /1r mw r -.•d-W•.0.�•.•�-•.W• 7 V/�/tifi.ir a..rt •. -w /.I 00.w....a•••r..rl•1 rr..r-•4hm ft-6 0.0-20-.1 •.-w�.••1-.•.d...a! ••...ter it ... LA-. •--r ••- mom no 484 • .aI-I-I rw.. r..�-- .w..•-.•..rr t•s r...-�•wr 1�-r�•-..r••r�-n-.••-ate+-..w.-.M•rr i�wl•••-1 •••'- ram• ISM Ow•r 1�1.��a•.r 8Arr•sow"• 1 ww 0..•./......rw f. r.. is •Y so.-+•-.� .-..•r ..• • •-.w A..-....-..mow-I,r wr w Ow!•••Ilrs r' +ram w rw-w•...r.•-�r-..••�-..rr•ar•r•...i•� .+.+.. .••r r•1•w�•..1 r r w r^r w•.I••.r� r w • y 1 M tiM�-�_.-�__ �_._-.-.� :...r•r.•-ww�r�•rsr-.w�.r•.w••rrl.•S•1�. +-r r 00%db . •-•-+...r f.w-ft I• Fwe sm" •r ram. INS, ti•µ aw.a.wr�I a+ �err.rer•...-.•..� �a • am ar-•fw-.w-.r-�. r r.•.. .r w r r•..r. -r-. �. .-r..-r - -••r..m- GRIMM row r eft �.1A�y���-•-1.-•1•r•rr�rr ..--.• w •.•.•r-�.�+�.....--4. -r•.-- .r qN 1 - -�7aMa�.si#MaYMM •�..r.•�r�r� al�iw/ •.-a•�-w..-rr--.s r-.-r vr� •r..+.q arrr s �-- wanaa... /ra....Ia..r...-a•r..r..-•.......+ ,w. - aawei+raffia - ,- r-..5..�• -�tii •vas.•r.w.-••• •III UM w• �-t as r11 r w..r-w...w/r y.r.�► - A a 1 �-rlar MIO ._ uft*a.f. Q.r�.r.-�ra-/a�w-rs.r•�--.r.►-•.• •ra.rw�...___� fM•y ...•�, ..•...+.r..r rr-.....r�r r.•warms a wR 4 IIIa�I -I^� "a*.1 r..rr- r rr. -rs ..-- 01-- .. 40% a 104ft go i w+r•r er SI.rft• ....+sue.-10-00102•-w.r an 0 w M 00 r.aillftm aow+ai I SKrI CLOY-austEGTM OLUC COS•Cov%Tv.GOP GOPT-c*HClLFOMEN GOrr-/PPUCJWT . 11'4TY Of HUNTINGTON WACN !'uw fit`041 99PAN"WorT OF DovtkoP11 w"MVI >s iow"CTION A!l"T OOPPICTHM !NOTICE �Svildinq d Electrical 0 Plumbing P�NMIT NO. AooaESa I I ' •-F �. • , ,,,M. • 1 t i fIf Vwo are q6m!or+, on ttw a0aw PIaaM call Ate a --- i � btttwr+n tx+d . t N rlt! CAj .� 30 I ! L • • • " . !• '• •'••1• � •• i• �► � w, s �+,a•rj tr:.. S'� . • r � r•�: ••• r � �• Jam• � •wt . .0 a• lj i mow 04--w w - : Lot No. find paowm Addres as lr _ 'WOOa ��ioo � .' t 39 In dft .•� • . +- • d Jr Approx. Sint �- Approx. Valuation PERMITS REQUIRED • , Building [] Electrical Q Pllimbint ❑ INSTRUCTIONS l It (will) " be necessary to SLOP WORK immediately and to obtain the Po"it . . fe Provide two copies of (I) Plot plan, (':) 7 Plan. .� t0 (3) Structural details, (4) Eltwtions, (S) 00w infor• mation ss required. dr C� Special InsbuctWo -. P 61w6 V--- MA OL � (� I ;wtify that one copy (wes) (was. Mft at the , • •— atwwa addrfss - • -- : -_� • O inspicwi Sivatu" f� � ••iris Rwtt f1i ti1M N !t�11ts�� / twr OAR - f 7 i Cat of Huntington m� N (�!/IIIti11'MiitNT�/ C IMMtIM11 Y DM LMMT 9WIAM Q hbn 6364041 9364"s Miry bNririww 9�gt71 May 2S, 1988 Mark O'Donnell 220 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 "' SU13JECT: 503 JOLIET. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA Dear Mark: The site plan for 503 Joliet has been reviewed by staff for zoning compliance, and based on Section 9652(c) of the Huntingtort Beach Ordinance Code. it has been determined that a conditional use permit and conditional exception applications are required for this -- project. In addition, a chain of title is necessary to determine the date of creation for the I existing lot. I recommend that the chain or the title be submitted first so that we may determine if the lot was legally created. I have enclosed copies of the application for your convenience. if you should have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 536-5271. Sincerely.KI ' mot........ �� Mike Strange Senior Planner MS:Sbm . . . ' .. Cityof Huntington Beach 1 � ;�# • ' �!MAIN iT[�tT � i`a11.IpOA1MA ii6� "'AATMEW OF CONtA W" 0EVti1,.O "Ir awls"Oiuir" W6624 1 Iis�rriMlllM�w1 M1 Diw MU42 636•5271 July 12. 1988 Mark F. O'Donnell Pierside Business Services Post Office Box 329 Huntington Beach, CA 92641 SUBJECT: 503 JOLIET STREET Dear Mr. O'Donnell: This letter is in response to your correspondence dated June 21, 1988 and your nun n"d telephone inquiries concerning 503 Joliet Street. As stated in past meetings and conversations, in order to proceed on your project you must file for a Conditional Use Permit. The necessity of this application is due to the extensiveness of rehabilitation work being conducted on a non-conforming structure. Yaw building presently encroaches Into the front yard setback area and therefore will also require a Conditional Exception. Upon submittal of the necessary applications (Conditional Use Permit & Conditional Exception) a staff member will be assigned as the project planner for your project. 1f in filing your application you should have questions that carmat be answered by the planner working at the counter at that time, a meeting should be scheduled with the Counter Supervisor, Susan Pierce. Questions that cannot be answered by the Counter Supervisor will be directed to Scott Hess or myself. Staff recommendation on your project will not be rendered until such time as the City has adequate access to all facts related to the project. Once staff has researched the project, a staff report will be submitted to the Planning Commission for public hearing. Typically. there is a 4-6 week time period from the date of filing to the public hearing. We hope this letter has thoroughly addressed the process which must be followed in order to complete your project. Should you have further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Susan P:clC- of my staff at (7 14) %36•-S271. Since r ly. i Mike mse yVol Plannttrg Director cc: Sum Pkwft. Asrociate Planner Mike Swta V. L•&ld Use Tecltrtician NA= �r ro1rs�q li92 ®r 9432 Altercations to a nonconfocninj structure at use. a n tc or alterations an or *pairs way be Me which do not enlarge the square footage or increase the height of a nonconforming structure . Reroofing for health and safety purposes may also b permitted under this rub- section . ( b ) Nonconforming structures shall not be enlarged or altered on the exterior in any manner unless : ( : ) the provisions contained in subsection (c) applyl or ( 2 ) all as- pects of the existing structure ano the proposed addition are made to conform to applicable provisions of Division 9= or ( 3 ) the planning commission permits such alteration subject to approval of a conditional use permit and conformance with the following conditions ; ( 1 ) That , in the opinion of the commission , the alteration is necessary to secure added safety or re- duce the Fire hazard and/or to improve the aesthetic appearance of the structure ' s architecture by oringing the design into greater conformance with the surrounding neighborhood . ( 2 ) That the alteration or Addition shall not i.+crease the number of stories . ( 3 ) That regardless of any or all alterations, enlargements , or additions , the floor area shall not exceed more than ten ( 104 ) percent of the floor area the structure contained at the time the structure was classified a: nonconforming. ( 4 i Trsnt a set of plans covering the proposed construction, alteration , or aduttion shall be sub- Mitred to the commission for approval as to location , design, color , and general architecture; and any work so represented shall be completed in accoroance with the approved plan; and no permit for such work shall be issued until the plan has been approved . ( c ) Sub)eet to use permit approval by the board of zoning adlustraents , existing structures which are noncon- forming only because of setaack requirements may be altered or enlarged provided that the alteration or enlargement is in conformance with applicable provisions of Division 9. Additions determined by the director to be minor in nature Okay be constructed at the existing yard setbacks it such 7►/67 4& setbacks were legally established . turd. 2679, 16 Dec 06) 9651 6 c t on . Specific provisions of this article shall not appl i •eparatel�r addrtased in an adopted specific plan . (Ord. 2 79, 16 Doc 96? ( prior law: Ord . 495, 6/46 ; Ord. 1105, 1/65 S Ord. 1703, 2/121 Ord . 1945 , 12/74 ) i �I f I 7 Ii August lit 19" Mike Adams PlamLmg Camission Huntington teach, Cal . Canditfotla1 Use psrrit No. 88-31 Clear sir : My initial negative reaction to the application is that it is devious . No mention is made of the structure taciong Delaware which was a store from about 1920 to 1963 and used for storage a ince . This s twruc tune was tut ver used for residential purpases . At one time there were gas pumps in front with the tanks still under the sidewalk area. A future unsuspecting purchaser would soon find that the store was torn down to the rotting sub floor which at places is below grade level, existing floor joists were used with zero clearance from graded,no provision for ventilation and a 4X8 hip beam with no support at the upper and which will allow the whole roof to sag. Sincerely yours , � i • • • • • . • i • � ' 1 I � . I sees sad Beret to the site hs• potential cc creating a itiowal traffic tracts to t ters*ctioa of Aloft Ague aa4 a arwasaisl create eatta •use Of traffic impacts 9eeratod by the props h hour fashion ohms, d . The proposed dancip To tertaimaent use does not coaform With the Wntinyt Beach 0 inane Code in tesms of bufder area= the rest ant buildi"-, s approximately leh foot from residential es to the north ( tass Masco Avenue) . 5. The pro ed dancing/live entertai nt us* is not compatible With a existing 24-hour market with the center . C-5 CONDt TI - pXJWT T.. no, S-31 APPLICANT: MARK P. 0'DOIULL Conditional Use Permit No. 88-31 is a request to permit exterior alteration to an existing single foxily dwelling that is nonconforaing with regard to setbacks , parking and building separation . The proposed project is exempt Class i Section 15301 and Class 5 Section 15305 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act . B IrEC I�pLAl1 ; I i The site is located within the Oldtown Specific Plan-District 1. The following is a toning conformance chart comparing the applicant ' s proposal to Oldtown Specific plan standards: Deny Conditional use Permit No. 55-31 with findings and conditions . THE PVHLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Los Hartley, attorney representing the applicant, spoke in support of the request . He said that the applicant ' s request whets the requirements under the old toning code for a conditional use permit and that stopping the work has Created an ey*sore in the neighborhood . Bark O'Donnell, applicant, spoke in support of the request . He said the improvements to the residence would enhance the lot even though it still would be a small cottage. He further stated that there is a lot of diverse architecture in the neighborhood . Tom van Tuyl, Pier Realty Group, spoke in support of the request . PC Minutes - 8/16/88 --lZ- ( 1170d) 0 RAFT 01;041§ Nabb", 213 Portland, spoke in support of the SON the !r*pe:rtr is an eyesore and the oddition is a big 1we roverredt. Charlie Unger, 8442 Springhurst, reported his concerns with the requ*st . NO said the garage for the subject property adjoins his Property and is on the verge of galling down. He requested the garage be rebuilt within the proper setback requirements. j Natalie Rotach, 220 fain Street, spoke in support of the request . There were no other person present to speak for or against the request and the public hearing was closed. A NOTION K&S MADE BY S I LVA AND SEOOND BY K I RMLAND TO APPRAM CONDITIONAL USE FRUIT ND. 88-31 WITH ALT'E' MTS PINDIMS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLO"INC VOTE: Comissioner Higgins expressed concern with quality of the construction of the remodel and suggested that the entire structure be demolished . He further expressed his frustration with the applicants misrepresentation of interior repairs instead of a major remodel . Commissioner Leipzig stated he would not support the motion an he felt the remodel would not enhance the property or neighborhood. AYES: Silva , Kirkland NOES: Livengood, Leipzig, Ortega , Higgins ASSENT: Slates A!lSTA I N: Notre A NOTION US MADE BY L I V''ZXWOD AND SECOND BY H I GG I NS TO DENY COND I T IONAL USE PERMIT NO. g•-31 M I TH P I ND I NGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYSS: Livengood , Leipzig, Ortega, Higgins NOES; Silva, Kirkland ABSENT: Slates AWTA I N: (lone F'Z/DING$ Fie �AL 1. The proposed structure will not be compatible with adjacent proportion because it encroaches within the front Yard and exterior side yard setbacks , as well as in the public right-of-way at the corner or Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue. �-� cab PC Minutes - Sllilkg -13- ( 1170d) DRAF! 3. Substantial alteration as proposed will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working as residing is the vicinity because for structure will preclude IN covameato within the public rigbt-of-ware and will ingede ght distance at the Corner of Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue. 3 . Although the property is it ul r n �co f a r q p pe T req a i a iq►ir teen, the is+1 of the lot satisfied the minimum site of 3.500 square feat +nerd exceeds the minimum frontage of 30 feet . Therefore, the Conditional use permit is not necessary to preserve a substantial property right . 4 . tncroachmont into the required setback is not compatible with setbacks established for properties to the north, south, east and west and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon those properties . C-6 APPL C I T'Y OF HUIi'T I NMN BEACH A request to nd Section 9101 of the Huntin on Beach ordinance Code to allow chic temporary uses wfthi the Residential Agriculture (RA district subject to condi anal use permit, and to amend Section 951 . 15 . 1 to allow tempora recreational vehicle 1 storage within the Restricted N'anufact inq district (XI-A) subject to conditional use rMit . I The proposed code amend nt is tegorica1ly exempt from the provisions of the Califor is E ironrtental Quality Act . fiTa r�$FCC KDATI Otl: Approve Code Amendment No 88 s and recommend adoption by the City Council . THE PUBLIC HE"I NG OPENED There was no one p sent to speak r or against the request and the public hearing wa closed . A NDT I ON NA"s $Y LE I PZ I G AND SECO BY K t RKLAIID TO APPROVE CODS Al V D KEPT 110. -8 AXD RECOMOM ADOP?I BY THE CITY COUNCIL,, BY THE FOLL+O"I NG AYK$ : vengood, Silva , Leipsig , Ortega Higgins, Kirkland 110E8; one AdSRW: Slates ABSTAIN None PC Minutes - A/li/t! -14- (a17dd) R 1 Krue t* 7RTH I w'✓1N� � N.�ls MOW milb A A .i A • • in gea�mmeewW 64 eA604— 91-101-YI owl 7p to 3 iell, AW) ry'1 f1AYY1 lib Ksk"T" b. SEWNRZ pdleclisuec) LZ 7 le e, Peo fy E: c IT� 4E�WTXTJ r ► T�W ` vks t z ew n AT Tti�. A Lo-&) t UG9.-y �0�w '�"�-}lS �.�"��t.S..�► L COn6ZM TO -Ne nC\ J T t4 k�z z Oj:)C aT P�s ►T +.. j Lk,., Ij lci,�e AFL ucl� .. 1 r) C;�t �A tat HW� To & tisjjtm Beach and Prop+*ty Ownsm As e resident and property aarraer in this �I eoaeh, is �sa+e with gnat Pl�ti that 1 writneserd the of the old hours on the Morth- Baet oat�err of Jalie>rt and , not to far fm hatam we am rWt now. hey fealirmp wee, Olds in great, finally this hone wrill Ipt the tuoela.tt 1t no dr. What a benefit to all of us %tro live nearby.w ri>repa you have notiood that front was stopped in ttae frandre st W and tst no waft ha•s been done i:q% three manthhe. Thia la beam an the City of Huntington Beenh his stopped thU project for some rearans wtdch I wiu rvIate to you. Places ommidelr what the ImpUostimo anti. Reraon 01: By takes off the old aiding to prtipera the building for atucoo (a shows that was whc a cw the bluepr nts rW applioation for peituit) , the o6lw has ooze into oonfl.iot with an ordintaaoe (section 9652 (b) (a) ). This particular, owtion deals wwlusively with olds hames that do not met oerta►in set-bw* t3 that were changed AF70 the home wee built. Would you prere:rr that older hni , be m ft wore attractive? ; iieetsora /2: The City a13o feela that the home in being r u delerd in excess. About M,00O is being spent and that in a mom frsetion or the cost of a new home. It you had the option of fixing up your alder hame or going out into this Taal eutrte m whet to buy a rww hose, rataat would you want to do? Go you feel that ppvople ahaould be able too remodel their hame:sr? Personally, I like the blaid or die recent haws dowry heals and prefer Huntington beach's 016ownlTawnlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to staking the haamie elowwr, sate, arrd attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUAW FW AGE, NO ADDITIONAL UNIT, 00 ADOMM AL STORIES, N0 ADDITIONAL KDROOM are being added. Only a r =xMl. THLS PROPERTY, TIMS HM 1.5 ON TIC SAM EMMATION IVAT IT HAS 0M ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the PLA1MING CUMLMIC MI WARM IS CM ALC= 16, 1968 st the CITY COUNCIL. CHAMMM at ?PM. P1.lASE OOM wW PIAM SIGN CAM mmTzaN. speeirically, we male your suwpert for than oa■platicrt or tam It 11M which ■skes our nei*bortmd mom attractive grad provide a !titter hum ror a loos l family. T, the undwa lined, support the oomp.kation Or the lift Or the hues at 503 Joliet, H ntirdt4ml Beach, CA. ! IL Pacifica realty you, V"* O'Donnell Donna Kimball t 06W Mim 5110*I Skm1 i 40 Munt'MOICK, O#Gch calkXne%Z646 I�t����t•�t13 To UmUraton Sawh bmidenta mW Famim y : As a resist, and y arm In this part of "Otington Nerdh, it was with mat pleasure that I witnesmid the of thra old ham an the Owtb- !�t oa mw of Joliet and Iadisutiapolis, not to fare from Wharer we are r1Aht macaw. My feelirop wens, '"this is S mit, finally this hr wiU got the fea ll t it rwWn. What a borafit to all of us who Uve near".e r'erhpa you have rrotiord that w�ark was s topped in the tfvm&g stqp arrd that rya weak has boar dam in tksm mmUm. This is betcmm thrr City of Hmtington Beads has stopped this prrj ject for sows reasorwr Which I will relate to you. Pleam aormsider what the iaplioatiom are. peasm #1: By taking oft the old tiding to prepam the building, for stwou (a chw%W that sea, shown an the blumprints and gelitaation far permit) , the ow er has oomre into oon at with on ordinance (3ection 91552 (b) (c) ) . This particular section deals exclusively with alder tomw that do not ■et oeertaLn stet-back requires mrts that were clod AF` O the home mm built. Mould you r^fer that olden bmw be male some attractive? Aeon i2: The City also rrAls that the home is being mmieled )A awma. About A25,0DO Is being spent aced that is a emrs traction of the coat of a rmw tom. If you had the option of fixing up yow older Roan or going out into this real estate market to buy a new hale, what would you wrnt to do? Do you feel that people should be able to rmmmkl their homaa? Personally, I like the blend of different hoaee down here and prefer Huntington beaM'a OLdTown/Towtlot sma to the tracts. I should also iaent ion that In addition to making the hom cleaner, sale, and attractive, No ADDITIONAL SWAW POUTAGE, No ADDITIONAL UNIT; NO ADDITION& STORIES, W1 AW ITIONAL DEDfiOM arme being adrleri. On 1 y a reaadel. MS PliOPF M, 'THIS NOW IS ON I11E SAME: F"WATXOM MIAT IT HAS BM ON FUR OYER 50 YEAW). So, we need your he 1 p, the i"tANN I NG Cx MI&SION IW ING is ON AUGIl:,'T 16, 19M at the CITY OOUNCUL C11AMl*LS at 7 M. PLEASE C(W- mul f'LXIW SIGN OUR PE"r'MON. Specifically, we aA your support for the aaWlet ion of this remodelim which makes our neishborty-,ol a" attractive and provide a better how for a local family. I, Ctrs undera ipted, impart the ooW let ion or the r emmUl ing or the how at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. AJokm0^1D .- - &ijs .-A APF. rem K�rxt c.T�L rw mnk you, Hark O'Darrml l t To Huntington 06ach Residents and property Owners: As a M aidant and pr Warty comer in ULJM part of Hnntingtor; Beach, it w with Feat plaraitm that I witnee ned the r ling of this old 'gram on the Nortb- Bast con ier of Joliet a lis, not to far from where we are root nw. MY feelin n were, *This is great, finally this hoary will not the facelift it no@&,. What a bwwfit to all of us who live nrerrby." Partape you have noticed that worn wa 3 stopped in the 1.reams stable acid that no wo t have bean done in three a mthe. This is Locaum the City of Huntir4jt4n Beraete knee stopped this pMJWt for seine rwAsonsa which I will relate to you. Plasm consider what the iaepl icatiorm are. Reason 01 : By takites off the old siding to prepare the building fnr stumo (a d wW that was shown an tore 'blueprints sari appLication for permit) , the om,,,r has scare into crx►flict with on ordirmarm (section 9652 (b 1 (0 ) . Th.s particular section deals exclusively with older Nam that do not abet certain set -back requirments that were charged AFTi 71 the hraae wan built. Mould you prefer that older 'muse be ede aeory atuvative? Resson 12: Thee City also feels tliat this hcremes is brig n led in exomun. About i25,000 is beirwg sprint and that is s were fraction or the ooat or arrow how. I r you had this option of fix' up rexn- older hose or aoipg out intu this real get-mts autet to buy a rww hose, what would you want 'sc do? Co you feel that people should be al)le to rmmx*l their tmes7 Perswally. I like tttie blerrd or dirrerent haw3 down here arxf prorer IluntirKtron Nmc-h's O1dTownnownl of arm to the ttac:to. I shvul d also sent ice that in additim to awkift the ham cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIOMAI. SQUARE FW1'ACZ, ND ADDITIO1" UNIT, NO AMITIO11A1. 55MIM, No AM ITION& 1*2*00M are boiM added. Only a 11earrde 1 . MIS PHiWOrTY, 7H1S H@NE 115 GM TM WE YOM AT I ON THAT IT HAS FM ON ENN 0011 50 YLW. So, we need your help, the MANNING tl7tlCMION IWAR ING IS ON MAW 16, 1966 at the CITY ODD NCIL CHAMMM at ?PH. KYAM CtOM atd PLEASE SIGN OUR P' ITI ON. Spec i r i oa l y, we ash your support ror the ocmp l at ion of this r 1 irg %Midi oaken our ne ightmrhood ■uree attractive and prtw ide a better hmo= for a local family. 11 the urdrrren 14p.-i, support tyre amp lret i on of too I i ng of the hmaawnr-t 5031jol set, Burt l i igt-an PA6 h, CA r `hark you, 16ft O'Lbnrol l I To " ntirftcan h fteldents and hopwty ems►: An a rraident grid prapn ty maser in this part of MsrUftgw esiab, it W" with great plaumv that I witnessed the remodelins of t!w old hairs an the 1lorth- "St CMIM of Joliet aind Us, not to far tram where wee are riht etiaw. NY tMal PIP , nhis is great, finally this hale will, net the tb=Uft it needs. Whet a benefit to all of us who Uwe ='raarby." Pattie you have noticed that work was Mapped in the framing stago and that ra work his bow doers in hears manths. ThJm is beawas the City of Huntington 8ebh has stopped this project for rot reewns which I will relate to you. Plasm oonsidw what the imp"'oatiorne are. FAmu an i 1 : By taki, off the old siding to prrepam the buildirs for atuaw (a dhww that was strewn an the blueprints and applioatian for parult) , the owner has oo■er into omrliot with an ordinanae (section 9652 (b) (o) l . This particular section deals m1usively with older homm that do not east aartain seat-bim* requLreamts that m, chanted AF1 the home was built. Mould you prefer that older ho■ea be grade meta attractive? Reason 02: The: City also feels that the home is being retxleled in excess. About t25,000 is being spent and that is a mom traction of the 000t of a new ham. If you had the option of fixing up your older hone or going out into this real Mate market to buy a new hem, what would you want to do? Do you feel that pule *xWd be able to remodel their hones? Parsm lly, I like the bland of different howa clown here and prefer Aunt in gLon Honeh's 01dTowuPTowalot area to the traeta. I should also mention U at in addition to Making the home clearer, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FCOTACE, NO ADDITIONAL. WI'T, 00 AMITIaMAL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL WWROOM are bei.-A added. Only a ra■ndel. THIS pAOt'F.M, 'PHIS "W IS ON ME SAME F101MDATION THAT IT WAS Ems]! ON " OVER 50 n". So, we rased yotr help, the FLAMIM CcIO S1-:30 I tg:Al XG IS ON Aucmr 16, 1958 at the CITY 00MCIL ChNGM at 7pll. PLIAI SE COW zed SSE SICN OUR PLCITION. Specifically, we ash your support for the oampletion of this rervdelirig which aakea our ere ighborto& more attractive and provide a better home for a local faisily. I, the undarsigied, xuppor t. the co■plat:ion of ttw remodeling of the hraa at 503 Joliet, "tirdtan dewW CA, lhw* you, !uk O'Donnell To AMrrrtl O jklac Y NwLldents ad Prvperty ors mas: As a residrat od mW in this of vemi* it wra with prepw'ty part t3�,toa , weat plesvire that I wittresred the r�axfeling of thr old ho u" on dale Narltb- lest ow of Joliet and Indianapolis, rot to tar fr m `+game we am rfht now. NY feeLirrga Marry, "This is barest, tinslly thi3 hume will yet the faae].itt it reeeda. What a bewfit to all of = who live ma tor." . Pertapa You have notioed ttrt wont was stepped in the framing stake and tart no work hen been dates in We* eronthe, Vda is beomm tiro Cit; of WmtbVtm Beach has stripped this pm.%ot for woo reswo which I win mlate to you. Plemw coraider whet Uw LoF11catiorms are. Neiman i 1: by tald * off the old aiding to prrrpsm the building for stuoon (a ehataye that was Ww%rri on the t`tuWAInts and application for permit) , the ow r-r have oam into conflict with an ordinsnce (ssotion 9652 (b) (a)). This prrtioular section dorals exclusively with older homes that do not set oemta►in set-back tvquir+rawnts that wore ehwlpd AFTER the ham was built. ltauld you prefer that older hom a be mode mom attractive? Plesam 02: The City also feels that the hoes is being I led in exons. About M 9 0M 13 being spent :and that is a smart fraction of lUm oast of a newt home. If you hod the option of fisting up yarn` older hcm or going out into thin real wtate aaritet to buy a now ham, what %mold you w%nt to do? Do you Feel that people shhw1d be able to raaodeI their hcaen? Perawally, Y like the blend of different hoom down here and prefer Huntington beach's O1dTow►lTowmlot area to the trscto. I should also awition that In addition to making the hme cleaner, safe, and attractive, No ADDITIONAL SQUAAE F=AGE, NO ADDITIONAL UNIT, NO ADDITIONAL. STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL WAWWV arm being added. Only a 1 1. TM PR-n-ER17 , TIM NW IS ON TW SW Ft1t1N ATICNI THAT ice: HAS BM ON FOR OVU 50 YEARS. So, we treed your help, than FLAMING 039tI 100 WAKING IS ON AtXWT Ib, 1969 at the CITY COUNCIL CHAMMM at ?FM. P ZAM CCME and KXASE SIGN OW WIT ON. Spec i f ioa.11y, we salt your supp wt for the eosplet ico of this reaudeling which arrkers our nre1gtatXx4Wod acre attrM:tive and pttrrIds a bett or hart for a local family. 1, the underaLpied, support the completion of the t w wdsllft or the hear at 503 Joliet, lbmtingta'r Beftah, CA. �i : WE* Two* you, !%rk CIDN"ll „1 1 , August 291, 1988 z y City of Huntington Beach Planning Cau sission P.O. Box 140 duntington Beacb, California 92648 Location; 303 Joliet Request: That conditicaal use permit No . 88-31 be approved. This is a remodel and will improve the appearance of the subject property and bring it into greater conformity with the �I surrounding neighborhood. I am a Huntington Beach property owner and a local realtor. Leo P. Keller 21041 Oceanbreate Ln , i Huntington Beach, Ca . 92646 ' I To "tingtcn Deffich Aeerideents and Property 0WOM: At 0 reeeldMt and prOpe ty, MW In this peat or HuntUYStan Bench, it was with lip t PISSM ri that I witnwwed thee ra odexlrig of the old hu mre an the Worth- Brat oomer or Joliet nand Irrd.irrrnpnUs not to far from wtrere we are right txtt. W feelf cqP wmrie, 'rhos ii peat, ritually this haft wf41l got than fbarrlift itroods. What a b mefit to all of us who live nearby." I Poch you haw notioed that wank ways stopped in the ftaa:Irg rtgp sad that no %w% has, been dare in three months. 'bier is boomemse the City of lbmtirgton Beach has stopped this peo ject for some reemm which I will relate to you. Pleases © What the iaplioatiors are. il+ wm 01 : By takU. ? off the old aidLngg to prepare the builditg for sttrow (a otw W that was drawn on the blueprints and appLio.►tion for pwuit) , the swayer has cow Into oantliat with art ordinances (section 9652 (b) (c) ) . 7h1s perticul r section deals excluoi"ly with older hams that do not met aertaitt art-back rvquitrratents that were ctr m%W AFM the home wins built. Would you prefer slut older hcm m be evade mots attractive? Aar,wn 02: The City also feels that the hope is being r,amo Bleed in excess. About U251 000 is WIN spent and th of is a mare fraction of the oast of a new, hams. It you had the option of fixing up your older, home or ping out into this meal estate warirat to buy a new !rote, what would you want too do? Do you feel that people should be able to rowrxiel their hovel? Personally, I like the blend or different homers down hem and prefer Huntington Beach's O1dTow VTownlot area to the trwta. I ehapuld also vention that in addition to emking the home clemar, safe, and attractive, NO ADOITIONAL S N AW FOOTAGE, NO AMIT7OK& UNIT, NO ADDMOMAL SHIES, NO ADOrTIONA1. MMOOM are being added. Only a rem del. THU PROPEM, '1'M HCM IS ON THE 5AF£ FOLMDATION THAT IT HAS OM ON FOR OVER 50 rEM. So, we need your help, the PL ANNLNG LXHK S;ION HURIBC IS ON AtlCtis'i" 16, 1988 ,at the CM COUNCIL CPA1B5 at 7PH. P1.P" MM acre Pi. SIGN an PR7`a om. Speciric a l y, we ask your support for the completion of thi3 remodeling which makes our nei&1bor h od mom attractive and provide a better her for a local faaily. x, hate undernigmO, support the oampletion or the e+l.ird or the howtc c1s6 503 Joliet, HuntLrq1ton PA*oh, CA. usher 'thmnk you, ft* 0'Drxrrrll ltil It CY1 oft* Itsumts held hvpl 'ty 01tle": M a reeldW tt Wad pnopwty awnor in this part of H nti Dow* it tws With W'rat PIMA" that I NILW# ld the 14 vs of tho old ham an ter Morthu- ftst 601"trer Or Jaunt herd Indiampolis, not to tar rM rhea we are rw ww. My fealings tw e, wrhis is greet, finally thU tram rd11 Ipt t1w fto&IM it made. "t it benefit to &U of us wha live ana"." Farah eau harm noticed that twee was stapW in tlte• fr mi% ~ and that no welt has been dote in ethane amths. This is because sae the City at "tirtatan Bench teas stopped this pro j%ct. far xw raasore Which% I will relate to you. Please oomLder what the isplicatiaas are. Roam 01: By taking off the old siding to prapsm the buUd L* far atu000 (a ahw4p that was *wm an this blueprints and appl.iaatU n for psrlalt) , the owiner has came into aonfUct with an o dirtarm (section " t b) to)) . 'their partio Aw •eetion deals exclusively with older hoaen that do not not orrt.ain setrbw* its that twee c wrigod Art the hate wv built. Would you prefer that older hcom be wade me attrat:tive? Asamum /2: The City also f eel.a that the howe is being In etiOo+ - About i25,000 13 being spelt and that is a som frwtian of the ooet of a now haws. If you hsd the option of riztrtg up your older hone or Mp LPS out into thin real estate owtat to buy a now hdee, w at would you want to do? Do yae fail that people Nvuld be able to rvnx*l Chair horse? PsraxmIly, I like the bland of different tastes dearth here nerd prerar Huntir4" Baboh'a OldTown Townlot area to the traat4. I dw%ad aleo sontion that in addition too voking the haw cleaner, safe, and attretl-act, NO ADOITIOMAL. SQUARE FWTAGE, NO AWITIOMAL UNIT, NO Aa ML4AL. gT0liIES, NO AW TIty& KDROOM sate bait% added. Only a tee ode1, WM PROPEIRY, THIS HOW IS ON TW SAE F1aliWATION THAT IT WAS MM ON FUR OhlE7i 50 YEARS. Soo, we need Your help, the PLAIMIIG CaMM SSION HEARIIG IS ON AlGl1S'T 16, 19M st the CITT tX LWIL OWIM at 7PM. MA M COW and MAkE SIGN OUN PE'1'T'l'ION. specifically, we oak your supput t for the oa■pieticm or this r 1UM Wdch ■akea ear n 1#6ortaxrd nx attnwtive and provide a better tme for a looal, faintly. I, the umdsrsigted, support the onapletion or the r mdslirig of UN hum at 503 Joliet, Huntington Bea0hr, CA. address t il' 'ttu* you, Msr k 0'DwMll LL T* 1 1 1 �i and P'hopotyl OWAM: t As a resident and in Ud a part at BID*, it mar Idtb a"eat plow u m that I %dtrieseed the ersscpdrling of the old tam an the Nwthi 00t oar ar Joliet and Indlianepolimp not to far from Am we an ri#A now. Vq twliqp ""I "Ihia ie gnat, finally this bore %dli at the liaalirt it needs. Whitt a benefit to all of us Who lin nearby.• twrr Fe You him notiomd that waft was atapprd in the frromirg atgp and that no wort has been dame in thrv* months. Dti a it bmwm the City of H ntington hwah hms stopped this pro)eot for soma remwarr whLdh I will ralat4 to You. Plean aomider what the Li pliastiro n are. Baum f 1: By taking off the old aidind to prepmr the buildLrt for stucco (a ohm w that tins atemo an the blueprints and appl j oation for ppersit) , the owwr has oom into oarcnlat with an ordinari ce (section 9652 (b) (a)) . Ihis pwtiCoulir' auction deals exclusively with old house that do not met oirtain set-tom* requirements that worms ah wV 1 A AM the h me was built. Yauld You prefer that older t- -vi be mode wrre attractive? Nea;.eaa 02: The City also reels that the haste is bring r led in exaame. About $5,000 is being spent and that is a mom fraction of the cost of a new hose. If you hod the option of fixing up yow older ham or doing out into this rapal eatate savlot to buy a rover ham I tihat weld you went to do? ab you feel thrt peupl. should be able to r I their hcsm? Personally, I like then blend of different hoems dmm hens and prefer Huntington Beach's OldTo VTornlot area to the tracts. .I should also montion that in addition to making the heime cleaner, safe, ores attractive, NO AYIOTTTONAL SOUAAg FOQ1'AGg, 1O ADpItIMI MIT, NO Aty MONAL STORIES, NO ADOTT MAL BOADO S aria being added. Only i,% remodel . THIS PR0 WT O THIS NOW I5 ON THE UM !'oIB►4ala I THAT IT HAS DM ON FAIN ONQt 50 YEARS. So, we nimW your help, the PL.AWINC 00MKIW1ON FEAli= 13 ON AUGU4'T 161 1966 at the CITY' tXlWIL CPJMWM at M. PLUSE GOM and KXA9B SIGN CO ASPITION. Sprrcitically, we ash your a*ppot-t for the c ampletian of VU& raeodeling w i.ch miaIeen our nei#%bortw*d am attrimetive and provide a better ham for a laual family. I, the undernigrrrtd, support the aaepletiopn of the rwadal.tW cf the hoer at 503 Joliet, &vtingt-an Lerch, CA, � w A-1 0/ r At P i '!?memo you, X k O'Dmnall To Hwtiftarr Beach Neriidenti arid Property owners: Am a resident and propo ty awrw in this of Doub it tea with meat R lfto rye that I Witnessed the tr■p0e1 tidies , 1 A. OC the OLd houDe Cc the Nwoth- Blast carters of joust and Indiarrpolis, not, to far frog where wa are rWA n w. "Y tealirw wore, This is Refit, f inslly thia boo trill eat the facelift it needs. What a bonefit to all of tear who liver aeaurby.0" spa Iron hove rntiorwd that v;x k we stopped in the fr wing staff and tint no work hem bean darer in thm months. This is boamume the City of "tsrtir4ton Beach has stopped this prvjact for now reas<'m which I relate to you. Please oansider *teat the Ipplicatis7ns lee. hossm i t : By diodes oft the old sid M to prrsp" the building for atA (n ahrL a that wo shorn cm thw blueprints wW appl.icstiao ror pee%it) , the oter'ter" has oomre Into own Lot with an ordinertea (suction W.)2 (b) (a) ) . This particular section deal. 6=1usively with older homes that do not art oertain act-beo* to that %ease ct wood AFM the hear was built, Mould you prefer that older Ir -1 1 be oak sot'e attr wtive? Bosom i2: The City also feels that the hone is being r led in s►uess. About i25,000 is being spent and that is a more fraction of the oast of a nw home. It you had the option or rixirg up your older how or gping out into this real emtat i maftet t-o buy a rev haste, what Mould you want to do? Do rat reel Uvat, pnople should be able to remodel their hlosma? Personally, I UkMe the blend or dirrerent homes dawn here acid prermr Kwtirlgton Beech's Ol drown/Tornlot area to the tic t,. I should also smUon that in addition to making Uxt home clowwr, safe, and attractive, MO ADDMONAL SQUARE FAO "AGE, NO ADDITIOMIAi,. UM, MID AWIT'IONAL STORIES, 00 ADDMGNAL INDAOOMS are b lM added. Only a rewo, 1. THIS PIKWU CY, MS HOW IS ON TrE SAW. FOLMA `ION THAT IT WAS 8M ON FOR OVER 50 YXM. So, we noW your help, t w PLANNUC MR S:3ION ham. RDIG IS ON AlA M 16, 19N at the CITY COt1hICIL CPJM tS at 7PM. PlJ'.ASE CIS and PI USE SIGN MM MITION. Specifically, we ask your i%4*ort for thin ovmpletion or thin r amodeling which makes our neighborlvxd acne attractive and provide a better how for a looLl ra&Lly. I, theuMersi�red, support te cx■Plrticn of thw mammUlift of he ham at 503 Joliet, Ntnt irgton Noah, CA. � II 'the* you, Ittic 0'Dwv*U f .no MW m 1 NeeCte and Property Owners: As a remident and property tmr in this put of BmtiatsStan agent, it rr with Wmt p2mare that I witanrrraad the resodeling of the old hmm an the Nw th" Z%Pt oontee` of Joliet and Ited3,wpolia, not to tar from whom we are rw* now. Mb fo*Ltgp were, rmu is it mt, rinauy tt" hms will met the taras3, M it ran". What a benefit to all of to wW live mwobj.0 u h►:.fe notioed that worst wr:o a in the a asad tkat l�ee#teps yr topped Crasri,tsrg stage no worn has bam done in thaw st ath&. This in baeaaar the City of lM�ntime tai Brah hensetopped this project Car Baia resstRa which 1 will relate to you. PUmm ommider what the iaplinatiorm are. Beeasee 01: By taking off the old aiding to prep ure the building for atu000 (a ohwee that was shown as the bluusprirnt s Bred application for permit) , the owner has cores into ocae Mat with to ordirm a (section: 9652 (b) (e) 1 . This particular section deals amclusively with older hsmea thst do root met oartain sat-bw* requirementa that were dirrr @od A!'M the home was built. Would You prefer that older hoeea be made irewv attractive? i N. am f2: The City also fools that ties home is being mideled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent seed that in a mrs fraction of the cost of a new ham. If you had the option of fixing up you older hone or going out into this revel estate mmimt to cry a now haws, wtat would you went to do? Do you feel that people :+ "dd be able to remodel their hor ea? Pers rally, I like the blind of ditterent homes down Mere mW prefer Huntington beech's O1dTo n/Townlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to makind the haae cleaner, axle, aced attractive, NO AMITIMAL SQU r. FOOTAGE, NO ADOITICNAL Wn a NO AMI'TIM" STORIES, NO ADDMOMAI. BLTPCM am.. being added. Only a rm.mde1. THIS p"EM, THIS HIPE 15 ON THE SAFN; PMUTIGNI 'CHAT IT HAS BM ON FOR MV 50 1'yJ1RS. So, we need your heap, the PLAM1ING CO.SSI(Ni WAR= IS ON ALUM 16, 1908 at the CITY t 0tWIL CHMIM at 7PM. KXASSE MW mW PI.E:AM SIGN cXM PETtYION. S,pecifical l y, we ash yaw suppoK for thie caplet ion of this reeeadelir:g which aaake3 our neightxwWod eam corwtive and provide a batter hmn for a local family. I, the =k"I rrsd, P4"rt the oaWletion of the rmadalird of the hoses at 503 Joliet, Nmtiigum fit., CA. 00S Li T1laaai * you, Maio 0'DWreall i !'o !lraatingtan &MOA Nvraidents and huperty OerrMM: Ns a r"ident and proputy ar ea in thin part of Huntjngt4 n 8eaah, it was with Ore at pyre that I wits mmod the ri delIng of the old house an the N - MOt corner of Joliet and Indiaeeapol s, rat to far from we am right wog+. IV feeliM were, 'this is giVat, f1MUy this hM wily Jet the faaelit't it need i. What a benefit to all of us who live rmfty." t5tetraps you harry noticed that woes was at in the fe*dag sta4a and that no wm* has been dire in tlr4w mouths. Thies is bey the City of NMt1rg1%M Beach hrs stopped this project for aoeee rem= which I wUl reUte to you. Kmase oanaidw what tho iWlioatirorw are. Mason 01: &r taMcirrg off the old siding to prepare the bull bg for stta,00 (a c arlp that was abown an the blusprints arrd application for permit) , the owner has ocree into contlict with an ordirwece (auction 9652 (b) (c) ) . Thiar particular awtion deals exclusively with older harem that do not met owtain set-bw* rdqu rmenta that were changed ArM the how was built. Would you prefer, that older hussy be made mama attr*ctive7 Fusser 02: The City also feels that tare ham in being reeadeleMd iA exoema. About $51000 is being spait and that is a owe frerction or the cost of a yew how. it you had the option of fixing up war older hose or going out into this real estate market too buy a new ham, what Mould you want to do? Do you reel that people should be able to remodel their homes? Personally, I like the bland of different hams down here and preter NuntiLqgten Beach'a Q1dTowrVTawn1ot area to the trrets. I should also abortion that its addition to mkirs the harry: cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FDOTACB, ND A00MONAL U IT, NO AWMON& SlMO t No ADOTTIONAL 8E] MM acre boi.ng added. Only a 1rm.cxfe1. 1111.S PROP'EM, 7= HOW IS ON THE S" FrJI "TION THAT IT HAS HM ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the ?L.AM = OMLSSION NEARDE IS Ch AXQW 16, 19W at the CM OOLINCIL CHAOMM at TPM. - PLFJ►SR COME and P*.#TM SIGN OUR Pb'PITION. Specifically, we ask your support for ttre oampletion of this r"arradeling which makes our nei&%bor W aoro attractive and provide a better how for a local family. I, Un undae+sidrred, support the completion of the rveeadeling or the ham at 503 Joliet, Intington Mooh, CA. nom 70 You, "W* O'Donnell