Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional use permit 87-5 - Lamppost Pizza, Inc. - Pizza r t AAM ALthwilM 1� PuOMM+ AFjvv 1ifcmoWs or AN bw%06"X 0161101t AoliCes iw OKrN al Ih6 SupN-Or COvf1 Of Mi%Oi COWAty, C&OWnia. NVMbM A•6214 381Ad :1 Siple-DW 1061 and A•?N�1. O�MO 11 Jur» 11N3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange OwAft AUDW. ..•.... 60foa 1 14 MM 646~ N rr A + MMr I am a Citizen of the Unded Slates and a reudant of the County alores,ald, I am over the ache of elgmwn ;a rears, and not a party to or interested In the below entitled matter I am a principal clerk of the Orange Coss! DAIL Y PtLOT. w9111 which 1s combined the NEWS-PRESS. a newspaPor of general circulation, printed and published In the Gltr of Costa Mess. ' County of Oran . State of California, and that a Notice of ._ Pudic lira r ing of whKn copy attached hereto is a true and corn,341e Copy. was printed and published 1n the Costa Mesa, NewpOrt Beach, Huntington Beach. Fountain Valley. Irvine, Ine South COW communities and Laguna Mach issues of said nowspapw for __'_�n t' ._ M.f: _ 4e4 fMill "GrM10 wit the issue(s) of - - _ Apri1 : 3 19fi 7 . t9e 19e _ t 9a1 ! declare, under penalty cl penury, that the 10re,20ifg Is true and Correct. G' Cuted On _ Ar�r i 1 .:] ._._� . 1�lS I at Costa Mesa, California, ;, ; A S"t'ure ' CITY C Hl, N T"INGTI N BEAU:H 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 9204 OFFICI of TMf CITY CL90K 1 June 1987 Hal A. Young , J: . , Eoquire 3146 Wedhill Avenue Suite 100 Costa Mesa , California 92626 Re : Use Permit No . 87-5/Lamppost Pita Southeast corner of Brookhurst and Adams Dear Mr . Young : The City Council of the City of Hvntsngton Reach, at ite adjourned regular meeting held Wednesday, May 20 , 19871 denied your appeal to the Planning Commission ' s denial of Use Permit No . 87-5 ( Lamppost Pizza ) . This is a final decis .on . You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094 . 6 , you have ninety days Trom June 1 # 1967 to apply to the courts for judicial review . if you have any questions regarding this matter , please call this office at 536- 5227 . very truly yours , ALI CIA R. WENTWORT►i City Clerk 00 By CONNI% BAOCRMI,Y :eputy City Clerk cc : Lamppost: Pitxa City Attorney Development Services Director Enc. F r� SPWAL Mt%Dci1cD1W;X Pool I IeaIM 30 .1.4w" Ow bra I AW d. ttot.. 1101 W ■aiwr.l ►ad bw Jett.itiae 1•4ii1++i l'W4ot*rwarl it.+. Awwor 104. oW OW as *Arrrlrw ftvvtro. Wrap" U OWN 1r't 1141tpt. aMr 57 VA-11111 A. Ijw. Ior. t. 0WOM tl 1111a%1 N C.tt►IWI. TrW rwat'o juiw.rw 40 at me thew of T 1* 1111 2W tr.aadalr 10 Ma .i drr+rrt of wrhvMarr rAn 1944 htt►t doriarl" OWN Orr I• aN 644 W% 4r.4.iwtt rrt"iw Matt Mo• Ire Ar A its Idtrr d ..i .• w, A"% a*I ad of.a lime am W airr"rt ribs I% 6**waa .a that .ht •*o cw*j .f ww.•ow4w i1r p- PM hetnil w r"v?W4 and ftep tv an"tac retreat► rasa. It•wM IM ftIM tea • w,Mde.l to Reid .watt 04111 Argll.r. .w at.rt%larwo awl a f"10-• Iwo to fttrtams tr.raw+l by to A#$Vr•f two fsry.e* .( 4Utrr6 v00wr me boor" bdwo nwor 1 rwaso"rrNy Me petanNy p.r.MW Wa. •*1K f -nwo twoodm/eo nWm" was MI• lOSO4 060M it whir 0 01 IbCO ONN +N Iwywlwl awy M 10 whAt Iovi wA fa 11.E fba"" amm" patrli ort wfr Mt AM of Ili* 4*1M. ad hM PPROM tiro ire• aa"artwl by srNrom h)as" %. tAr1 ram et of •t*wwI ae •I real from jirlt. 171rttMr of Art4a wa !trrl► t,;ad. w.1 swunr.r omw 1)pd.o #%rt wM .f Ilver.silk U('.AJM M. mob?*. otter ►ovetrultw ILL fee of I'lMGSAa* fer r+Nrta of Mrwwl b rare• lM meWeer .weft. is rtwtaed t%ra 0Mtar o0baboal of taftwrntloaw W r'Mow! to to Ilr r••r+ap.raa lot to-vowarrulow Own" poly r4610 of wlarvieabtru obovw rbrry ■Y I "ihrM6 of bm oat eoww b N+wea•lowl M Map/Mr ...trt for rattwtlw rr"'"'d of 11M .lr.voywr• as .N ibifr"Ifta t iam W&W W r I M N men stelae w• of t hire dare ev I'r7.t t, loom .%�� C%&vb +.IIW aril - I to In"Wrt .• •[tins oaer's IF t�t11 i++rt" 1 a ea.aha 13,11111111 tt1aM f►r*A40, wawa retain wpmrworb Amer. I .3d P. ter t r►yr 114. 1094.6. jWkW i s viev r; Ofivw l w *I toast .prat hs; rooks; rulft; Now, rrtewr; *006tlitlt "W lady dy /nrd; Irr- Maaacr. or I laww n f a) Judkial tmrvit4wn of any de+ciaim of a lovat ag" � . olherr than school dbKrim as the term kcal AC"',cy is defIrY..•1 In Suet ton 54961 of the Gawrrmvwnt Co*. or at any board„ off%cw or awt th. -*of. may be had putiulant to Sertlon 10Wi of thilt t.'rclde only It the petition for writ at watrdrta punrturint to such >rrl;tkin Is filed .:'%thin the time thnits tipedfled In this action. f bl Any rush petition *AU to Mal rtwt later than the 90th day foUawing the rebate an which the decision brew. fUMai. U time Is no prowirion for rasWmtlon of the doebion M any apli&%bie pMA- Molnn of any statute. charter. or nAle. for the purporell of this 0W1.7f%. the dKi" Is nml on Ow taste It In made. u then Is ouch pm Won for comokk4stion. the dwisalon is f IrAl for the purposes of this sec- tion upon the otpirwiion of the period during which sail% rvc=*Wera• Onn can tx ~I.- pi'twWtrd. that it tviwrltlerptlan is ramSM pw v- wit to any such provision the Mon is final to the paupatNe of tb orctlon on date that reroraWcretion Is l,e}et.• ed. 1 r 1 I %e rritm l llw•t r I r t-otA of l hr• 1 wa vc-A ho Mm U W fwvp •'t''d by ION' hM:11 itt,,'t"tia'y 1W 1lh Iauttlt. tKfkVf. IN' ilklyN whie4l It1:Nlit the thvisakNf and ch tll br tIt•Nm I to the peiitkft-r withift !to ,keys iifkr he ,hm hied a written rtipavl I►xrr(ur. This hxml agwy hiker► iscov" (ran the pttltkWW Its Wtsual awe for t 11in cribMrlZ of tubet wlere pn9wi ft U* ltlaDot'd Smth rem d shall krlu t t1w vrao. fRlpt of Ills- 11111ttlrlpifttl7f, PA /kNnd'tlW 64 nocim mW enkm OW pr'opv a drelsim by s 1 mdm ea kw. three tlraal Ail et, fill er11■rltllsl $ 4 I WAW Or 114xIp Ta 10"*6 On Wits. WI tirJaa rtrhAOU In dw pi m m lof- at dw buW gpaa or ha eaetiltiaMoet, bsamL a('fk w. or Woo. an wwritealt Nridef m. mW mW •their pop" In the Craw. (d) It tk- petlUbrerr tlko a twpk*1 /or the rrme! m Mrtified In lall+Itivi%ill" It.) Withirt In dAym 6111rr the►dMir the det~iNeera bigmes 0- nal a ll provkkd In vAdtivulan (b), Ow tiltrl: within whkh a lrttitktn pwmmni to XMWn lams inty he nerd shwft he a><teerdw to neat weir than t!w -we day following the da" oa Which eha romm Is wither pmanally dtiivrrW or malMd to the petltla er of hie atta im eel tec- OK It he Im am. (a) As used In this seectlon, declriaet ao om --aL, 0 W7, &*Ohl Salt m"ve dwi" made. alter Marft atrpteltdtrad. demot ft or die- mkdit an ottketr or wnpio)@ e, rewiring or de Wft an ap pb atlon for a permit or • liectm, w dmyb g as a pl mOm liar ems► retim meet bets do or ab wrmca. (f I In mokbe a Armal decision as ddbwd in b�dtvtelu. (a), tllw WM ap WY s)rall pr vvide aatkt to tlw party that the tune wtddee which MSeiat m iew ntaM be Is d+mrerfd by this seFtlien. As used in this avbalvision, "party" rm m an ~ or ow piom wbat Im bnn suelpndrtdl, demoted or dietanlbsed; a pmma whom permit or f Nu been rvvolwd or whose opphmtflaet tour a i prr nWt or Ikvm haw been dw4od; or a petsw whow appikatian for a retira mm be uMt or •llo wKv hu brigs dean" (s) This action shall be apptkabk In ■ " agary a* It tht dowtaht Hoard themd rd"an ordinsa r or rasola ion amkfni this wdMan appl:mbk. It mach wdinancr or rw*Mm Is adul l; t)w PMIMQM of this wrtiwet SW pmftu owrr any Coati eift pmvbioa In any of herwim applicable is-1, wiatbad to the r~teftr. t A"vd 1'7 btAll.1"ll. C.274. P.M 1. 11.) trortlr +k. Wgm,O Case*"" Code Yxak C419 pme "m LAMY Stan" A*bbbi►t►.Nfr tw o@W IOno vt* CJAI raw A#afttpf► dfe "New NW et .t+.IM•t+>tiw.. n.fa/Iw %ml f f-iwdfr M.11 h •Ifgrwlirr. •b"ate+ ilto .1► l.r�frlw rlwe�ll t )NO W00. wt tft ►Iw rf e.�A+e.' fiaw� 1m ►sl.m-.v flow* 0601`of"hv foafto I. to gem" Wm6pf lbr M+MII A.e. hid 0"" OrfW M M.iw.l b"Ary Wmillatrwel lgtom ft mm of .m-We to fire ompw- I-04-W fmrfin mAr► lopoinubm vl M* WOWI►M M A1011*1 .IW elbroN to @Ww .1*.04 Y"T. •%ft n.1i nwq OFFE"wlwW wMrim 11e f "u6n I.wfkoft AwwOW Vol- **Opp lWad1n. .WM1IS aw+. N W44* M "-*;W Amry O&WOHM A1M •. �irWom t•Aelew In dwrUol M ter a edit Ar4 fw 061 L%&*Sr- tic 0 I L.tN 101. HnL A YOUNG, JA HAS A. .outia. �w / tQ.�,hf wii.«rn. p ■uCwti[w GOrfA MLti♦ CALOrOwWA pfAlb ''r7I [►[�rr0'rl �� , `t�/ A1 •�1.Oi�d COL1.9904 ►+ DC7 r [.f. .1IC...,[L April 16, 1987 /� I Cat/A rO.:% .1 t+cC►A. City Council �► City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California 92668 Re t Use Permit No. 87-5/Lamppost P i t sa/ SEC Brookhurst and Adams Honorable Coanci.l : Appeal of the Board of Zoning Adjustments ' denial of use Permit No. 87-5 concerning Applicant/Appallant Lamppost Pizza, Inc. Is request for approval of the relocction of an existing piass restaurant in the Chopping center located at the southeast corner of Brookhurst and Adasia, City of Huntington Fseach, California, was heard on April 7, 1987 by the Planning Commission . At that htaring , Applicant/Appellant' s request for U" Permit ft. 67--5 was denied. Applicant/Appellant hereby appeals the denial by the Planning Ce mission and seeks a hearing and review by the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach of the application and denial of Us* Permit No. 87-5 . This appeal is submitted upon the grounds that the Findings r for Denial are an inappropriate basis upon which to issue a denial of use Permit No . 87-5 and that the Findings For Denial did not sufficiently or adequately take into consideration facts end mitigating circunstan at which , if seasonably considered, would require a reversal of the denial and thereby require the granting of i Use Permit No. 87-5. Concurrently with the delivery of this Notice of Appeal , Applicant/Appellant is delivering to the City Clark of the City of Kuntit.yton Pasch the required fee of One Hundred SAxty-five and No/1000 Dollars ($155.00) . Very my yours, RAY!ral cc$ Jos A. Mistenew J69"6 T. 11r1 t; sr Rich atom as Rarxo ION'S 81`11iCa Ai. te111t11CUDI NGS INN 1 no" >tlr 1.rn.hrll for sere,' trial 1b Qw11. 11tr ss«I 1 ►wlssr.I .%.vote. :-0wowt horn M.• 111ris.twlw e'allrefrsk 1'Nri..ts11s1itlresl lots. .\141r164 1101. wwddW ow slrlronjose, os.•reu. we"Ptr All t Itmil NIT e'nl 11114r. m4s. 1m. IJarrr loos. %. Namo dd f iMtill 11! ('&i kPic Tr6l 1-CNtt•6 Ig11Ms'l,*1 11.1.11sse mood sit of Ile, 1111 t 10. I144tnllfalr to ter+( som-lar at "FUU1111►a rust oboe Weise, 411s•1rbarpuf tslfllet Its. It& aPt adir hie .6s+4•hm rvsal,ioW pr1166n• lot fifth iR s•fft.. of ....assts 66rft1 .18101 •f'a 11%.Vaer as Wn'taf1 141.11 11$ Iwe.le►rom ••1 that •he, •a0 a"114/ .r( sw1r.l.adltlrt K W I*" r%%t red rat art rrar f wA rsfow rr swtliws pule W ►91004- 1:.w. 160 to" 8814 lwalrlegl to 1e,141 s4parl bills .litn0.m• I's iw16111411ryl •1a1 WVtolraT them M Nrkm Fre.lsswl 1-+-e Its dlr►rint f..r rttrl.u.r W daft&. U60nes its Yearly Were etwllf t r re r n xI.1e rhy the pme l t 1 p r.1 lasnl; I sa• ri 1 11 s.r rt w• s sliaslli sw►law e s rlrwra as* * 1~411t risen it was r..IMI that some of thl•ItrciA ew11 om to slat I.M pim me the chm/N agusr1at prtltlwnrr were awl nose of 11sr .Isere. " sort freivlre 160 da a•illperted hs rsimlem". 1\IG01014 I t As-q swift .d al.lsr+l no ,s ,-al frown pole I-Pimi1.r at AllArtkurts (1MT11 144 Ual. OW111 .•rf*ft rvW+t Ipl.i., Pleb •nt ltilfi. 611.39(`.Ail 70. t ande w after rree,+adas 11 a )tolswat of Note+tllbe hN rrelfrw 1r! •Irma) low .ww1• IN# refperlar swlart. in fpga11.1 Ilse "tier nsihoMw M rwtldiratlar. et 1-wrmit to to 160 t-♦•sm.1wIM for to-0046sraibe, 1 tMltsa t►t Ift 06111. 1N riwt•re II.rrr boo • alwikr/1t of tbrla ant. seek{ 1w rrtw4Il.b•d to sornw,sor mu►t for rwooAK rtnv.l.l of IM .L%wmnl• M .'i 1lrterlstiftfsIk 4 064111e,r I{srrr ..a• 041161nt s•t ILr r:fir• Vra ll s. I.F. 1'rssa 1 Mil it Ko f t 1 e e t emom Mrlrbr 111pr1 t !� 11r1 wHaasro lY •uillwrt s•4.liale1d11seser'a V.3d& I(trs t'.Ayi 114. f 1Mdleaa. -when gin , nallres, fir d stiff• 1094.6. tH11lkw rsvww-, *cislrlela it bct►j rtSlruelfrs; petitiaa; Meg; ale.; nloa ; llodsMa mW perms daltimeds .r. (a i Judkial review of any decision of a Its-al agrrl.•> . other th.:i; schor 3 district, as the term loc-.I aR"ry In def i rt d In 34)41 of the, Governnwnl Cade, or of MAY comnlWion. Word, olfirvr or agent tit. ^cot, tray be had pumm t to Section 10U1.5 of this mdie opt; iJ the petition for writ of tea rich t e pumm n t to ouch ILkwtion Is f iie'd 1athin the time limps sp, :ificd In this aectloll. (b) Any dash petition mMI1 be ANd slut Liter than the 9Mh dale, folk►winig the date on which the de+rhhlM ba•ottM firmr if thfft M flo provision for reconsideration of the drrlskin In any sP1dlcablt grovi- s\eon of any statute, cturter, or rule, for the putpoaes of thin strtim. I he decishAti is nntll on t hmi! elate It Ia mark. it there is rurh prep is" for rnconsideration, the dit-htion is final for the purpow-% of this srec- u on upon :he expiration of the period during which writ rreonskWa- Imn can be, weight; promided. that If t't virislderrltton Is toothier put•w- atilt to any uwh provision the decision is final for the purfeoara of this .vet fan on the date that reronskirm t ion Is r^ryectsd. (ul The I-millifelf• Iti'UTA of I/%- ln-1r1-(w41rlsm sh.-111 11t' here- t1rtrd b,• 1114• hi -.11 at;rllcy ill- il, 11Mtu11L.• IIY,1, l0t:1111, nffil•cl. fit. ill,',1'tl( whis'k made the d1tviltion antt It wil lids Mimmi to lilr lietilioewr• within :tU t1:I,ya idler he, hris bletl .I wr•itlm I'"jm!*I llso 'fur. That, Imam mgm-y nay rocorter from the petitiolm- IIto tactual coats for it meficriNtV or ntherwim prgmuini the romd. Such mvmd shall ter tok the trot►- SMpt of the- pl'omvMrls % all pk4ltNW all notieas mnet vrden, arq► pr")ODod daekWn by a b tlrft otfloer. the (Intl dod;ision, art a& 1it(led U74 1 'tMM 1 WRIT 1F MARDATS IONA "bits. All re)a ftM nhibitlt In the possession of Ow la AI #@ascot or Na Casittnifletiaet. board. offkw, or ape i. aU WHttast atrillslm. lead say aatlter PMPPM In the case. (d) 31 the path t kxwr files a rat it"t for Ow ivratrf all sgxv if tied in rallrlivi:-skm (c) wilhin 1( Mays slfl!w the rbir the dteialm bec'rones fi- nal es pletrkkA in a"vhlkm (b), IN- Iinx, wPW whk* It la-litkal puivmnl !o Stt-tbn IMA.S rruty IV filed shall he exten to not later than the :loth day fotdowing the date an which the roeoard is either peraona4 delivered or ar ded to the petitkmw or Ida arttarmy of roc- osd, if he has oats. (t) An used in this section, dKMiala tt ftm adAmIksIM7 cAWA- Wh4stive deelsion made, after hearing. au ; trdit, denwtft or dis- mimini an offices or eenpi"ve, reeokIng or twrinp an application for a panNt or a k'enw, or dmyft as appUmbon for =' Y*Ure- ment broetit or allawa nm. (1) In waakhm a final decision u ddined In suttdlvWoa (0). the total SWWY thatch provtide not.ke to the party that the Uaw sl4 tab which AWkial review must be sought Is emrrned by this section. As Used In this subdivhMm. "party" mmna an atrwer or am- ployoe she has beat su Wert l!d. detno ed or diatniased; a parent whose permit or Ikvnw has been mwoW or whove apptk-etion for a permit at Ikena has been denkd; or a person whom applleatbtt for a retlmwent benefit or aikm'arwce has been denlet (g) Thk eM;oh aMU be appllkabie In a kK1al vigency only If the gvvtTubg board therttot adopts as ordinance or m olution rnkinr this sett km appiic able. It such tidinanee or rrsotutian Is 04WA4 the provisions of this section sh" prerrafl aver any cordlk-ttets prowhion In any otherwiar appikabb low trlating to the s*jwt matW. t AdM by Stats.I*' . c. 270. p. Mt, i 1.) PwM Never WS'A'. C&bl►t rd. Form*. 0.11 rmtWoof+. t.bmi MIR Mew A*14AIrlr01l14, IA• •w•l 1100.oblrr► CwJ:C. NNlr A40406Iroul• alWA sod bw?2 19I.M046re I I". HOW M b + Is Big I that 194d tw• rn.pbir.wr.1 rvular4t Ival'l [>tlgNt+IM N e1MNs1►rttM rt�e/Mc ! hS4 .141.1-ilm h/r1.Mr0eft IY .Isle"Mee MMflurr ter IPW44F Prom" slats" "Ott jwtilw•1: ywd, lu rirw of wer6wft' h11wvr 1.1 .OL11161 Iwrlr 04MIaWrwlirr Nw►oit" 1. le //t~MtA &$*Orr I G♦ IlM41a A#I. I" eAgn etre.l M Ph Anw.i "A r tr+.1A.Irrd frr+aoie .it : wawke writ of w ow+Mh to otAtAf swow. Irw.'IIpre SOMA" ofl.r I+yl«wlax W( "we iwlw•t.r.l of dl.lrwi OW oahwr• Iw r bw a.Iwl.i ytor. whMi► r-.wrraH w Ire iol~ 60140-4. of evel•Iw 10e1I0rllr Ano4w Tel• wr rr PPOAM. e00rNIF M. ON Wer44ir Ivy Ile.%Wb r r MWr ftP% Mew %. N r wth ~in in •lelatln d 91- Nettie 4rt op (*M1 M C.WAMr. 1K 0 1 A.M 101. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION Door &Awntted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Subtri"edby- Charles W. Thompson, City Adminixtrator �-'w Pr i'' James W. Palin , Director , Development Services A EAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S DENIAL or USE �� I .•,. �', • 'ff0 87-5 - LAMPPOST PIZZA, INC. r• _ Coltsirtii�t with it Policy? Yr ( J Naw Policy or Exaeptkm �►rrmt of Irsus. Recommwvdation, Anelysit, FundWq Sours, Ahe►nrthm Ac*m. Anedwmtr: k� I Tl it , QF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Lamppost Pizza , Inc . to the Planning Cor=ission ' s denial of Use Permit No. 87-5 . Use Permit No . 87-5 is request to permit the establishment of a pizza restaurant in a retail center . a ATM: Planning Commission and staff recommerid that the City Council sustain the action of the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Planning Commission and deny the request . ON NOTION BY SCHU1 ACHER AND SECOND BY HIGGINS, THE PLANNING COWAISSION SUSTAINED THE DENIAL OF THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUS7WZlV 'S AND DENIED USE PERMIT NO. 81-5 BASED ON FINDINGS , BY THE FOLLOWING YOTF : AYES : Sch•imacher , HiCgins , Leipzig, Livengood, Pierce , Silva , Summerel l DOES : None ASSENT : pone ABSTAIN: None 1'rINDI NGS__FOR -DER AL: 1 . The proposed use will not be compatible with adjacent properties duet to noise, tra:flc, lighting and activity associated with major restaurant businesses . 2 . The establishment , maintenances and operation of the us►a will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the •icinitY . I 3 . The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will be detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the neighborhood. On February 25 , 1987, the Board of Zoning Adjustments denied Use Permit No. 67-5 , a request by Lamppost Pizza to relocate their pizza restaurant from an existing building within a retail center ( Pad I) to a new building within the same center ( Pad A) . In August 1986 , Pad A was the subject of Site Plan Amendment No. 86- 10, which permitted the pad to be located 18 feet from the adjacent easterly residential property in lieu of 23 feet , as shown on the original site plan for the shopping center . At that hearing , the residents of tha single family dwellings to the east expressed concern that the reduced setback to the commercial uses would be incompatible with their homes , specifically with regard to noise, lights , odor, pest control and crime . in response to these concerns, the Board of Zoning Adjustments approved Site Plan Amendment No . 86- 10 subject to the condition that 'No major restaurants or nightclubs ( hall be permitted' (see attached) . A major restaurant is defined as one having more than 12 seats . The existing Lamppost seats 132 customers , while the proposed location would seat 135 to 148 customers . The Board of Zoning Adjustments denied the subject Use I ,%rmit No . 87-5 based on their previous action on Site Plan Xaendment No. 86- 10, and based on findings that a restaurant in this location would be incompatible with the adja,:ent presidents and detrimental to the value of property and improvements in the neighborhood . The appellant contends that the intent of the Board' o condition for no restaurants on Site Plan Amendment No. 86-10 was that no now or additional restaurants be permitted to locate in the center (as opposed to relocation of an existing restaurant) . However, Site Plan Amendment No. 86- 10 prohibits major restaurants with reference to the particular pad in question , Pad A. The concerns expressed by tht residents and addrersed by the Board at that time relate sp::.-iEicalXy to Pad A ( see attachments to staff report dated April 'f, 1987) . The appellant also contends that the restaurant will not be detrimental to the general welfare of persona residing in the vicinity or to the value of property and improvements in the neighborhood . The Board noted , however , that the existing restaurant is 35 feet from the nearest residential property, while the proposed restaurant is located only, 18 feet from residential property. Additionally, prevailing winds will tend to carry trash, odors , and noise toward homes from the proposed location, rather than away from horses as at tho existing site . Therefore f.t may be expected that residents in the vicinity of the proposed location will be more adversely impacted than those at the existing site . V4/87 `2- (79624) �..STA A: The proposed project is exempt Class 1 Section 15301 Iron the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act . Not applicable. �a Al13M ACT 10 1 As an alternative action, the City Council may consider approval of Use Permit No . 87-5, based on the following findings and conditions of approval . FIi:DT(IGB E'OR APPR4VML; 1 . The establishment , maintenance and operation of the use: will not be detrimental to : a . The general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity; b. Property and improvements in the vicinity of such use or building . 2 . The granting of the use permit will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Huntington Beach . III 3 . The proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City ' s General Plan and Land Use Map. CONDI1',IQNS OF APPLY: 1 . The site plan, floor plans , and elevations received and dated March 11 , 1987, shall bw the approved layout . 2 . Rear door of the restaurant (facing east) shall be equipped j with an slams and shall be for emergency use only. 3. All applicable conditions of approval of. Use permit No. 75-61 and Site Plan Amendment No . 86-10 shall still apply. 4 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. S . The development shall co"ly with all applicable provisions of the Ordinance Code, building Division, and Eire Department. 6 . The applicant shall meet all applicable local , state and Federal Fire Codes , Ordinances , and standstds. RCA - 5/4/67 -3- t»say i s are 1 . Aypellan! ' s letter dated April 16, 1987 1. Area map 3 . Minutes of the April 7, 1987 Planning Commission meeting 4 . Planning Commission staff report dated April 7, 19#37 S . Minutes of the February 25 , 1957 Hoard of Zoning Adjustments meeting 6 . Minutes of the August 20, 1986 Board of Zoning Adjustment* ti moee nq JWP:LP: be1a i RCA � 4- 7fii0� cr-It .,..,..f,....: M� C I tr2 s Cf'E-FP2 �• 1 /moo Sas as as go OW Fr fl �3 _ so y■ l Nam Ir N �w ti C 2 t � .i w4 c, � �M,�1 � •� ��----- --sees s/ !1 i LLL ' � �1,.r�s A+-!�2 ._ _1 +— w. k w� 4 a. 1 i ,' CF-E80 ma,mas ads" �1I up 117-4- 5 ■ 100 A NOTION NAB MADE By 6CMM&CnR0 SECOND BY SILVA, TO APPRM CODE AIM11101 NO. 87-3, AS REVISED, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYia: 8i lva , Schumacher , Aiggins , Piet-_�e, Leipzig, Susmerell, Livengoud, NOES: None ASSENT: gone ABSTAIN: None 1Nn 00 PAS,BXD C--3 AEP= Qr IQ_ �9NIB.G....AD.J.0 T T's D lIA1�._4L_.V81� IIL Nisfl7-5 APPLICANT: LAMPPOST PIZZA, INC. On February 25 , 1987 , the Board of Zoning Adjustments denied Use Permit No. 87-5 by a vote of 5 to 0. The applicants have initiated the appeal because they feel that the use is consistent with previous Board actions , and that, the use would not be detrimental to the surrounding property owners . Use Pormit No . 87-5 is a request by Lamppost Pizza to relocate their pizza restaurant from an existing building within a retail center located at 10056 Adams Avenue (southeast corner of erookhurst Street and Adams Avenue) to a new buildinq within the same center (Pad A) . 9ffYl,R4�'..,. T� The proposed project is exempt Claxs 1 Section 15301 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Art . Upheld the Board of Zoning Adjustasent ' s denial and deny the appeal on the findings outlined in this report . TNl. PUBLIC NEARING WAS OPENED Joseph Malthour , representative of the canter , spoke in support of the request and gave a bi lef history of the center and why the setbacks were changed and elevation on Pad A raised , He stated that Lamppost pizza needs more visibility from the street for its success and urged the Comission to grant the request . Rudolph Johnccla , 20051 Larson Lane, spoke in opposition to the request . No stated that he fools there should not be an eatety so closer to residential property because it attracts rats. He also feels that the Brash containers for the center are located too tar away frogs this restaurant location to properly serve their purpose. Mo llstson, 20101 Lawson Lane, spoke in appmsitiod to the rest bscaese of the noise created grow the restaurant one the trash freb1 m. PC Wastes - Jar Ooodi►n, 20031 Lawson Lane, spoke in opposition to the reque&t. ft stated that theta is already too much traffic in the center; there are, already three restaurants which create note trash; 6 d a possible rodent problem. He further stated that because the building being proposed is elevated that if the sidewalks are used people using thew will be able to look right down into the residential Yards . Allen Macenski , 20021 Lawson Lane, spoke in opposition to the request. He feels that the present dumpsters are located too for from the restaurant and that too many restaurants in a center creates a fire hazard . Dan Barrow, 1585 Sunland Lane, Costs Mesa , owner of Lamppost Pizza, spoke in support of the request . He stated that he has never had a rat or pest problem in his restaurant and that it has always checked out with the Health Department . Me further stated that his restaurant uses grease-free cooking (only dry heat ) and that it is not a fire hazard . He feels that his restaurant in its present location has not presented a detrimental effect and that it shouldn ' t if it were moved . i Phil Winkler, 20082 Viva Circle, spoke in op position to the request . He expressed his concern with the hours of operation (closing after midnight) , and fools that the existing parking lot is presently misused (with customers loitering after hours, playing loud m+isic, noise from vehicles , drugs , alcohol ) and will be more distlAr.bing if moved closer to a residential neighborhood . Thera were no other persons present to speak for or against the r:: �uest and the public hearing wan closed . A NOTION WAS MADE BY SCHUNACHEO.:, SECOND BY H I GG I NS, TO DENY USE PERMIT NO . 87-5 , WITH riniNGS, by THE MLEAVING VOTE : AYE6: Silva , Schumacher , Higgins , Livengood , Leipzig , Summorell , Livengood mots: None ADBBNT: None "STAIN: hone 11I0DZNGS role nLlltAL : I. The proposed use will not be compatible with adjacent properties due to noise , traffic, lighting and activity associsted with major restaurant businesses . 2. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the use will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons workinq or residiaq in the vicinity. The eutsbl.i shiswnt, maintenance and aperat ioa of the use wi 1 l be detrim"tB1 to the value of the property sad iaprovesr to is the Neip wyrbo". yy huMbVton b*aCh dW-0- 4 tse ff PORT- TO : Planning Commission F10m: Development Services DATE: April 7, 1987 i SUBJECT: APPEAL OF HOARD OF ZONING XDJUSTMENT' S D9J11AL OF 092 PERMIT NO . 07-5 APPLICANT/ Lamppost Pista , Inc . DATS ACCEE=: 1585 Sunland Lane February 27 , 1947 Costa Mead, CA 92626 rU o T: Appeal of the Hoard of April 27 , 1987 Zoning Adjustment ' s denial of a request to establish C4•-FP2 (Highway a pizza restaurant in a Comsercial-Flood Plain retail center . District) LOCAT ION: 10056 Adams Avn r u e (South- QLAZBdi.- IM: General east corner of Brookhurst Comawrc:al Street and Adams Avenue , IS'fi1MG tISE : Retail Shopping Center 1- 0 _._SUCIGEsTER ACTIOM Uphold the Board of Zoninq Adjustment ' s denial and deny the appeal based an the findings outlined in this report . Z_ Q _rd MERAL___ 1NEQ8MJL0 . On February 25, 1967, the board of zoning Kdjustnnents denied Us* permit No . 17-5 by a vote of 5 to 0 . The applicants have initiated the appeal because they feet that the use is Consistent with previous !bard actions , and that the use would not be detrimental to that surrounding property owners . ZONING ��r� mac- pL-�� ��aru►r aes : IgSth CC $tyhi Ct _pgaggrty J1L PLAN 095 t GMAT I OR: General Coarde t r i a l a hd Ned i u A 00 fie i ty i Residential Ca-FPf tad 23-FPZ (COMWaity pu•iae,1.-p'ieddpl.i4 oistcict srA tWIM Milk 0e"ityaideatiil-!'lao0�lei�r rdstrriiit) LAW miss cestir sad Walti-f1aily d"Itts" loft 7J VAL Olt,v A SAL PLAN MIGRATION: Low Density Residential am: XI-FP2 (Low Density Residential-floodplain District) LAW MR : Single faTil•- dwellings (itMtRAL PLAY DESIGNATION: Wneral Commercial Vlz : C4-FP2 (Highway Coomrcial-Tloodplain District) LSD u$R: Shopping Center The proposed project is esampt Class 1 Section 15301 from the provisions of the California Rnvironmental Quslitr Act . 1.0 CUASiTAL bTAXUS: Mot applicable . 6 .0 gEd YFLO Z_SM115: Not applicable . .Z.2. SPECILIC J%M : not applicable , d_0 $V2910 IQX, CO I_ME: no. applicable. file I YSLS : On rebruarr 25, 19870 the Board of toning Adjustments denied Use Permit No. 87-S , a request by Lamppost Piss& to relocate their pinsa restaurant from an existing building within retail center (tad t) to a now building within the rarer center (pad A) . In August 1984, Pad A was the subject of Site Plan Amend1ment Ice . 46-10, which, permitted the pad to be located 19 toot from the adjacent easterly residential propertr in lieu of 23 test, as abmn on the original site plan tot the shopping center . At that bearing, the residents of the single tarn lr dwellings to the east expressed comers that the reduced setback to the Commercial uses would be incompatible With their hoses, specifically with regard to Poise, lights$ Odet. Prat control and crime. In response to these cometas, the roars of seeing Jldjustmeats app#oved site Plan t go. •i-ld MaTet to the amwitien that •ft M jot restautb its of sightelwo s1,a11 C rented* (see attached) . A "jet renteerant is deSlad do ears eirp spore t"A 11 awts. The "Ssti" Law"st "at• ips flst ear 4/7l47 • * �� r euitosr*rs, while the proposed, location Mould Beat 135 to 146 Oustowers . The board of Zoning #AjustXMnts denied the subject Use Pernit No . 67-5 based on their previous action on site Plan Amndmeat N4 . e6-10, and based on findings that a restaurant is this Incat,ion would be incompatible with the adjacent residents reW detrimental to the value of property and iaprovemsents in the neighborhood . The appellant contends that the intent of the Hoard' s condition for no restaurants on Site Plan Amendment No . 66-10 was that no new or additional restaurants be permitted to locate in the center (as opposed to relocation of an existing restaurant) . However, Site Plan AmndmerAt No. 86-1.0 prohibits major restaurants with reference '-o the particular pad in question, Pad h. The concerns expressed br the residents and addressed by the board at that time relate specifically to Pad A ( Ben attached Board of Zoning Adjustment ' s minutes of August 20 , 1986 and February 25 , 1987) . The appellant also contends that the restaurant will not be detrimental to the general welfare of poisons residing in the vicinity or to the value of property and improve"nts in the neighborhood . The Board noted , however , that the existing restaurant is 35 feet from the nearest residential property, while the proposed restaurant is located only 18 feet from residential property. Additionally, prevailing winds will tend to carry trash, odors, and noise toward homes from the proposed location, rather than away from homes as at the existing site. Therefore it ajar be expected that residents in the vicinity of the proposed location will be more adversely impacted than those at the existing site. 10. 0 RSCQMNDAT Y OIM Staff reeormaends that the Planning Commission uphold the Board of Zoning Adjustment ' s denial and deny the appeal based on the following findings . FrMo t M..Cl:.�.1�L 1 . The proposed use will not be compatible with adjacent properties due to noise, traffic, lighting and activity associated with major restaurant businesses . 2 . The establ i sharent, ma i ntonanee and operation of the use psi I be detrimnta 1 to the general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity . 2 . R'he establishmnt, maintenance and operation of the use will be detrimental to the value of the property and iwprowaftnts in the ear i g hbo r hood. staff sweet - 40 71i'i F OVOCtYta the eosrd of Zoning Adjustment ' s denial and approve Use fermi t No . 87-5 based on findings and conditions of approval . 1. Urea map 2 . Letters from applicant dated February 26, 19874 and Match 20, 19117 3 . board of zoning Adjustment 's minutes dated February 25, 1987 4 . Petition submitted in opposition S . Petition submitted in support 6 . !bard of Zoning Adjustment 's minutes dated August 20 , 1196 (Site Plzn Acaend :mnt No . 86-1C) JWP L : kla •! ! /art! d/7/fit -4- Jw tM) t f� L^r4P. POff rmuNnONOTON OEA�C�1 oMLOPVS,T SWANS P44A FE62 '7 ":';' CA OW Febr,lary 26 , 1987 Huntington Reach Planning Department 2000 Bain S t re tt H,in t ington Beach , CA 92648 I He : Use Permit $87-5 Dear Sirs : As applicant fur the above referenced permit , Lamppost Pizza . Inc . wishes to appeal the decision rendered by the Huntington Deach Board of Zoning Adjustments in their meeting of February 35 , 1987 . regarding said permit . Please find enclosed a check for $165. 00 to cover requ i rea fees . If you have any questions or information relevent to the appeal or any necessary action on our part , please notify the undersigned at ( 714 ) 556- 139. 2 . Sincerely.,;' O r Rich Brown ' I Um SOW Lme &W Oft CWdmftftM9 W44011W Mon Nee m�1� RF(PvF.a Pp4t TiZZ40 15n Sunk" Lang + costa Mesa, Califon" MO. • (7140 9&13N March 20, 1987 937 2 i Huntington Beach Planning Department - - 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach , CA 92648 Re: Use e-rmlt 48?-5 i Dear Sirs: On February 25. 1987 , the Huntington Dosch Board of Zoning Adjustments -ruled against the- approval of Use Permit 087-5. r We c:hoone* to exerc,i see our npt ion to appeal said decision pu rnusn t to the prov is icons undo-r t h•: Iiun t i ng ton Beach _Ordinance Code. . Xc� c:nnt(!nd the spiri t of the agreement betweo-n nurtinems Properttem. th(• fatndnwn#sr, and the City of Ifunt ington De ac.•h was such that no additional or new restaurants would be opened in , the center. As we are not. a new restaurant , but an existing restaurant wishing to relocate within thv same center , we feel warranted in our proposal . ,, It seems logically inconsistent • that our. existence is acceptable at the present location and deemed "detrimental to the general welrxre of persona .corking or residing in the .vicinity'�, if re- located wl th in the ' sade -cea tfir,--i t _ ,lay further uaderstandable that those working in the vicinity-are _basically ' the sum people in both instances . Moreover, residents in close proximity to our present location concur with our assertion that there have been no impositions on their "general welfare" as a direct result of our operation . With ten years of operating history exhibiting a cooperative and j considerate relationship with our neighboring residents, art believe this finding for denial, should also be reconsidered. With these considerations , we request the City of Huntington Bosch Plaaaing Commision overture the deaiai by the !bard of Zoning Adjustments and approve Use Permit 067-5. �iw >hty� Minutes, 8. s. Board of Zoning Adjustments rebruary 25, 1987 Page 1 10 . No ' gns, swags, cables, poet--signs , etc . , shall b lowed in the lac right-of-way. 11 . This app val i ,s valid from May 22 , 1987, September 20 , 1987, incl ive . 12 . Lot surface sh 1 be to the sat action of the Fire mad public Works Department NOTE TO APPLICANT : You ar reby notified that , for future pro i s \ his Department moat receive Your j c fete ap !cation a rein wum of tau t i w ,irks j rior to the e ninq date or adequate review and processing. this 'Procedure is not followed our application will no a rocessad . � AYES : ranger. Evans , Godfrey, Poe, Sm NOES • None ti AS T : None USE PERMIT NO . 87-5 ,A12121icant : Lasppost Pizza , Inc . ~� A request to permit the establishment of a pizza restaurant in a retail center . Subject property is located at 10096 Adams Avenue (Southeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Adana Avenue) . This request is covered by Categorical Exemption , Class i , California Environmental Quality Act , 1986 . Staff reported this was a request to relocate an existing pissa parlor from one location in a Chopping center to Building A in the sane Center . The existing restaurant accommodates 112 state and the proposed area would seat 168 patrons . This would increase the parking demand by two ( 2 ) spaces over the existing use, start also stated that , when Site plan Am*ndment No. 84-10 was approved for construction of the new building pad by Business Properties, a restriction had been placed that era restaurants or night clubs would be allowed because of the proximity to the adjacent residences in Meredith Gardens . Those residents had objected t6 the prospoct of noises, odors, loading and unloading of delivery trucks, pests, etc. , and the Board had conditioned the project to mitigate those concerns. Staff further added there were already two existing restaurants in that area of the shopping center, and Staff recomwinded Genial or the request because of the previous rest O&CtIODS& 9'I!e ftblie Nariag was '"Oned 860 tb* -.4011eant9s reproMtatige, pea 1148rror gas preisent . act "Fro stated he r"140 like to atidere" the resid"ts1 oonrirw a" added be bad letter trams trap rty " Minutes, ff. A . Board of coning Adjust.4ents February 2 S t 1987 ,Page S owners adjacent to hi^ existing restaurant which stated they had no c.oMplaints over operation of the pizza parlor at that location . Mr . 9arro further added he would have deliveries made through the front of his location because there would be no drive behind the restaurant and this would eliminate most of the truck noises . He added the peak hours of operation for the pizza parlor would be in the evening after retail buainesses had closed and that would east any parking problems . ats Evans asked why the applicant wished to move to another location and Mr . Barro replied for better exposure from Adams Avenue which should bring more business from the Costa Mesa area . A representative of Business Properties , Joe walthours was present and stated the restriction of no restaurant at the location had been generated by Robert Franklin and the property owners of Meredith Gardens . Mr . walthour added that Lamppost Pizza would mitigate the concern of truck noises by not having rear deliveries and the pis=a odors were not that unpleasant . Mr . Nalthour also stated that , in his opinion , the intent of not allowing a restaurant on that pad was because of the parking situation in that area of the shopping center . Re further felt that , since the pizza parlor was presently existing in the center , it would not increase or impact the parking and added they would be putting in a retail operation where the pizza parlor was now located . Mr . Barro added he would be willing to sign a document stating he would only acctpt deliveries thrcugh the front entrance . Paula Macenski said she was representing the Meredith Gardens Home f Owners Association and asked if her letter had been received . Ms . Phillips stated it was in the file and the board members also had copies for their reference . Ms . Macenski added she did not understand how Mr . Marro could may they would not generate sore traffic because he had also stated his reason for roving to a new location was to attract more business . She further stated she liked Lamppost Pisxa and frequented the business - but she thought it should remain where it was . She added that if Lamppost Pizza moved to the new building pad, it would create a precedent for another testaurant or night club to occuplo, the building if Lamppost Pizza moved out . Ms . Macenski added than existing restaurants in that area had caused enough problems without creating additional ones . Another resident, Rudolf Johncolat stated his opposition through concerns over rates odors, garbage or trash disposal# etc. No added that he had personally killed twenty-seven ( 27 ) cats in that atea btcauae of the tsisting restaorantar add an additional •atiftl establiabsent WN14 create sore . K* furthor addend that , In walking his dodo through the Contact there was always Ccamb and latbelle around tho front of Lamppost Pia*a. -g- N 35/87 BSA Minutes, H . B . board of Zoning Adjustments February 250 1987 Page 6 .Toe walthour reminded Paula Macenski that any restaurant replacing Lamppost Pizza would be required to come to the Board of Zoning Adjustments for a Use Permit and the residents would be duly no ified at that time . Ms . Macenski countered with the statement the residents had already been through this process twice and they did not wieh to go througt• it again . There was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the project so the Public Hearing was closed . naryl Smith said he had originally understood this -,#aa a new restaurant coming into the shopping center instead of an mxisting one relocating to a new site . Glen Godfrey reminded Mr . Smith that the previous Site Plan Amendment had conditioned that no restaurant or night club could be iocated 'on that particular pad . Mr . Godfrey also mentioned approval of that request had been sought in order to conform with the flood plain elevations . Robert Franklin had met with the adjacent property owners and their request was that no restaurant or night club be allowed at that location . Mr . Smith added that , in Acting as the "Devil ' s Advocate` , the people who signed the letter stati ^g there had been no problems : created by having Lamppost Pizza in their area would not have had the pizza parlor odors blown into their homeal however , the prevailing winds would carry those odors into the adjacent residences on the other side of the center if Lamppost Pizza moved to the new location . Glen Godfrey reiterated the statement the Board ' s previous approval was based on the residents ' concerns and would preclude any restaurant being allowed on that pay: . He further advised Mr . Johncols that he should contact the Health Departsont relative to the rats in the area . Mr . Smith said he wanted it made clear that Staff did not go to the I residents and make promises about "no restaurants" without also talking with Dusiness Properties . He also wanted it understood that !Business Properties had been aware of the restriction at the tie* Site Plan Amendment No. 86-10 was approved . Tom Poe added that they had accepted those restrictions without appealing the boaacd' s action . UPON MOTION 8Y POE AND SECOND BY GODFREY, D8E PERMIT 00. 87- 5 WAS DENIED WITN TIRE FOLLOWING PINDINGE, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTS: P�1JN3 POR DENIAL : 1 . The proposed structucs will not bee compatible with adlatent prop*cties due to arAffic, noise, lighting, and activity. � - I - to C. Y r, ukt8►, M� R. hoard a Zoning Adjustmente ;cY 35, 1917 1 . The establishment , ■aintenanct, and operation of the use wl' 1 be detcLmental to the gentcal welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity . 3 . The establishment , maintenance and Operation of the use will be detrieenta1 to the value of the property and improvesents in the neighborhood . AYES : Cranmer , ev, nSp Godfrey, Poe, Smith Noes : None ABSENT : None ALtMIN STtATIVE pru t EM NO . . �, t.._ . #S111811) (it . .la �uesta A requc%s to restripe pa ; ksny area and fence 'tf a portion of the parking a a . Suh )oct property is loc:jted 18061-65 Pedondo Circle 111e sl1v of Redrindn Circle approx ' ately a.�,e hundred sixty- five et ( 1 MO" ' ) Soutti of Talbert enue ) . This ro(lueat c cve� t od by Categorical xempt ion , Class I , California rnv c,nrnc- .ira 1 Ou,il i ty Ac:t , 986 . Staff stated thi, w.= ; a proposs : fo ' restriping a parking lot . The applicant wants t out down or eli Unate the use of his lot by the adjacent tenants . :he driveway w a to be a reciprocal arrangeoent but the parking was ot . The a ual use of the buildings is to be I` for warehouse/sterag and, bas on that usage, a total of thirty ( 30 ) parking spaces w "!d be quired. Staff , however , would k recomend that Brix ( 6 ) arki spaces be eliminated from those provided by the applican - as . 2S, 30, ]1 , 35, 36 and 37 . Ms . PhL11Lp+� added that t applicant was proposing a sit foot W ) high chars link fence b S ff would �uggost a thirty- two inch ( 32* ) high decocativ* oek 11 and that no gates shall b* Installed . The applicants Heys ld d• la C sta , was present acid, upon questioning by Lee vans, said he had not seen a copy or the conditions . Afte reviewing the nditions, Mt . d• la CoeSta said the major issue of concern to his ct the parking and the block wails vuivented y Staff. No said th block wall would be estcWholy expensive and he thirty-two inch (32 ) height would not 1proweat People, from rkiag on his lot - that her would just stop aat*ss tb* wall . r. arm Se cuests •dead he we lasing O.a00 per MOO me y k was Ja"St ins to invemm tho lot fos p tomato* do also , adwhed t were W"p indast~rial builaia4 to the l.NOrti*to or" wit1 la Sisk fesaw and be did sot /taft's tIda for the bloak wall - that Imo oat it was oxeeting a ' +t• bilraalwIV for his ft7w sy Mlnyteta, M. h. hoard of zoning Adjuntsionts M9410t 20, 1966 I Pa" d � FWAS"Ment packing Plan &hall be enfocced by the afplic"t hared by the Land Use Division of the City of dunti Beach. 3 , oc to issuance of building permits the app nt ahall cog pe the cking lot so that it confor a the provisions of Art a 5i of the Huntington Beach Trance Code. (NFORWATtON ON SP Pic Con RC 1NLPN : • 1 . fire access lanes 11 be ntained . if fire lane violations occur and the service hn fire ttepartamnt ar'% r"uired, the appliCant will be li e c expenses incurred. AYES: Cranmer , C by, Pat , Smit MOSS: Godfrey ASSENT: pone Mr . God y stated his 'NO' vote was because the ition of rest& ants and/or ' fxst food' establishments can on crease the pa ng demand and cause problems in the future. CD� SITZ PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-10 ( Cont . from 8/13/96 ) j Aoglican t_ : business ProEeecties A request to permit a change from twenty-three foot ( 23 ' ) side yard setback to eighteen foot ( 18' ) side yard setback for a proposed 10 , 500 Square Foot building which was previously approved by Use Permit No . 75-61 ( Code requires ten foot ( 109 ) side yard setback ) . Subject property is located on the Southeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Adams Avenue . This request is covered by Negative Declaration No. 75-61 . Staff reported the request had been continued from the previous ; { sooting and was for an adjustment to a previously aVVcvntd shopping tenter . The pad has been vacant for several years and nerds to be elevated to conform with the new flood control sequiremonts for the area. A Site plan Amendment does not require a f~tblie ftariapt however , because of prior problem at this, shopping center site, it was deteceined that the adjacent property owners should be } ' notified. staff stated he had met with the operty erasers to asof fort to alleviate their a mee+t"N and he telct the pse61•fts had bweA Covered by conditions which were rev*aMewded for tM pg9ject, Staff C ee+i Aderd the ioa rd the heating hae re►se f m =Ueoaf f ref t* PCweloito beotiaq. staff recomes4ed approval WAV 4 * Mi4Ra • +r I r i 't b •.. �. `, +re iw}. Y wi ` '' ' i' Minutest N. S. Board of Boning Adjustments , August 20, 1944 1►a ge S There WAS a discussion relative to the previous Approval arkd DOC 1 Smith eXpressed definite concerns about the landaca iAq, esperialiy at* the rear of the proposed building pad. Me . omit sea tlemed the types of trots he would like used for srreonLal the ad aceat properties Icon the Center , along with the existing wallo the height of the wall was also a point of discussion. The Chairman declared the hearing still open and as4*d if the applicant was present . Joseph T. Malthour was prox*nt to represent the applicant. Mr . Walthour explained the necessi --y for raising tho pad since this was an older center and the pad was two foot. ( 1' 1 below the flood plain . He further explained the necessity of 1 meeting Government and insurance company requiresrents for the location. Mr . walthour also c*minded the Board the wall was fairly new and he would rather not have to rebuild it . Glen Codfrey stated a letter had been received that day by his office and asked that it be r .,�ad into the Minutes . The letter is as follows : 'Mr . Glen Godfrey Board of Zoning Adjustments P. 0. Box 190 Huntington Beach , CA . , 92646 August 19, 19L6 At: Site plan amendment 166-10, requested by Business properties Dear sir , As a 15 year resident of Huntington Beach, and as a concerned citizen that lives adjacent to this property , we strongly oppose any further developeaent (sic) of this site until the property owners correct all of the conditions ( but not limited to) listed below; 1 . A security guard should be provided on site from the bouts of dusk until dawn to patrol all of the parking areas to Control 411 existing problems such as overnight parking, drunkeness isic) , routines$ (sic) from pix:a parlor patrons , and night baseball in the I'I lot behind Albertson ' & 'i 1 . Avecnite parking and staging for ?out Buses in lot behind AI Ire r t son's. 3 . Drag racing in lot and alley behind Alberts*n 's. d . Praight truck deliveries should be maimed between the bores oil 1es00 p►.e. aM 7M a.m. �caeir a rater• •Irer�id he ieital�e+1 to elisdmat• we"r stary esaslltle" Noisy tra" tcfack rick-er eis Mrs a WW*O �Ji ` •i r ♦ 00fat 0. C Mmcd of & Mrimi Ad3aatments �t—t�rt �0. 4. b eatrent notice should be Mailed to aeighbots proVidt01 the se eme1ty quarde mobile tolg;+hone -number to allow disterbawoes to be tepotttd to his in*tt►ad of the 090t ington beach POUM 00pt. For your recoeda our addreas and phone number at* as follows: Dale and Cynthia Nenke 20182 tanbark Cr . Runtington teach , Ca . , 92644 Mork phone ( 714 ) 557-0922 ; Thank you for your concern . Touts truly, D. S. Menke Dale Menke• There• was no one else present wishing to speak for or against the pro)ect so the hearing was closed . UPON IMION RY POA AND SECOND BY CRANMER, SITE PLAN AM9NDMZMT NO. 86-10 WAS APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, NY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : f SP�ECIAL CONDITIONS CP APPROVAL: 1 . The site Man , floor plans, and elevations received and dated July 2, 6, shall be the approved layout , with the following Rra'ifications : a . Applicant shall provide a new six foot W ) high wall along the East property lint tot add two or there* courses of compatible blocks to existing wall ) . P+� 9 , { b . Trash enclosure shall be provided away from al pt"Orty and 3 closer to the existing trash enclosure for the nearby retail building . c . Provide gates between both ends of the ptopoeed buildiad and the wall along the heat property list subject to approval of the Fire Departtment. 2. ftior to Issuance of building petmits, tho appliasat 86411 *omit the following pleas: i -�.�,..{{ `__ ``y��,y, ,•, t*r .IIII� .,�d+.'OOi►. h .luY '°',:1i� ,,2' `l �! ''1+df _r y .'b. A" NinYtoo ■. 96 11*4rd of Uming Ad Justments "lost i0, 19ts sale 7 a . Landscape and i t t i ga t i on plan to the leper tsent of Dievelopoent Services and Public mocks for review #era approval . provide pla'au which will pleach aloof tb* WWt MO ) perty linty adiaeent to block wall Twent -t r Loeb boat size trees shall be planted app cosiSAtelY tweet -live feet (238 ) on center along the wall od joeftt tp the ■fiddle of the pcoposod building. The eaiitial tress shall remain in place. i b . Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Plan . Said plan shall � Indicate screening of all rooftop wchanicaa mpip wat &Ad shall delineate the type of material proposed to sateen said equipment . 2 . service roads and fire lanes, as determined by the Fire Department , shall be posted and marked . t . proposed structures shall be architecturally compatible with existing structures . 5 . Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the location& of cooking facilities , water heaters , and central heating units. d . Low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets 7 . All building spoils , such as unusable lumber , wire, pipe , and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle then. Q . If lighting is included in the parking lot , high-pressure lamps shall be used for energy savings . All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent *spillage* onto adjacent properties . 9 . if foil-type insu:ation is to be used, a fire tetardant type shall be installed as approved by the building Division . 14 No major restaurants or night clubs shall be permitted. 11 . No twenty-four. (24 ) hour operations shall be, permitted. 12. The Boatd of toning Adjustments reserves the ri4bt to revoke Sit* Plan Amiendment Me. Sd—lu it any violation of those conditions of the Suntington Beach otdinance 04McS0 13. All other Condition* of Approval of previowsl - ed site Plan A"nalment 00. 64-13 and use rocuit 100. 71-�`.r anrll testa in etfect. y10, 1 l minutes• M. bo hoard of soaiag Adjuktawate August 20, 1966 r4ge a 1NTOBMATIM GM *ractric, co2s Rtwiazygns: 1 . The development shall Comply with all applicable ptoVisi4ns at the Ordinance Code, Building Divi,siont arnd Fire Deprrtseent . 2 . Fire access lanes shall be maintained, It fire, lase violations occur And the services of the fire Dopartoent are regatred., the applicant will be liable for expenses incurred. J . All signs shall be brought into compliance with Article 961 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . All, freastandinq signage shall be low-profile , monument type . 4 . All applicable: Public Necks fens sh A ll be paid price to issuance of building permit& . AYES : Cranm*r , Crosby, Godfrey, Poe, Smith KIM None ABSENT: None N -CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION NO. 86 59 !B646cant : Thomas L . Jacobs/J i R builders A toques to permit a second story side yard encroach t of two feet ( 2 ' ) i c a required five toot ( 51 ) side yard tback . Subiact Property is l ted at 502 fourteenth street (No east corner of Fourteenth Stree nd Pecan Avenue) . This request is cover by Categorical E phone Class S, California Environmental III Act , 66 . Staff informed the board the a ant was requesting a variance to provide usable floor area in t per floors . Where is an abandoned oil well on the s and a lime Department has asked for 4 six foot ( 61 ) clearance round the a a . This clearance, has caused the building to shifted four f (41 ) in the front . A five foot (S' ) side d setback is require and the ground level will maintain that ootagei however , the sere level will encroach two feet ( 21 ) . a director of Development Bier cos boa approved the open space rcangement . Staff recosase,nds app al of Mee terqueest wit editions . Daryl h asked that the, findings be alteeCeed to tetleee t seeci circumstances exist because, of the hardship ce"I the a ed oil Well . Olen Gadtctr requostod a coadlties be ad t reo future addi t ineal square footage er th i fed 1116 ►etc be ally this stractux*4 �v, ��n CA !'ice ` r 1 y� w*fo A. wouwe, in. colt& rtaA C^LIF00041A *Roma �� •� 1'►tiwOAi W16.►1A01 0. s1.ICw04944 ,� �t lf�rl •ys•o�i� y J004111 0. YCCk.&'1 04nil 29, 19V �/�/X� !yam( ,• •' � i City Council and City Clerk CI'!'9 Cr iitri8t'Itci'PdM IN AM 2060 Main Street 8untington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Use Permit. No. 87-5/ Lamp Post Pizza/ SEC Brnok.hurst and Ad"$ 50mrable Council and Clerks Public Hearing for the Appeal to Planning Camission Denial of Use Ptrait No. 87-5 has been scheduled for Monday, May 4 , 1987 , at 7 :00 P.M. The principals of both the Applicant, Lamp Past Piaxa, and the Landlord of the Shopping Center , Business Properties Partnership No. 15, are unable to attend the scheduled May 4, 19V hearing due to previously-scheduled, out-of-state, prior cowitments. Both Applicant and Landlord are greatly interested in preserving their right to present evidence and express opinions at the hearing. ?berefore, Applicant hereby petitions the City Council for continuance of the hearing of the Appeal to Planing Ccmission Denial 'I of Use Permit No. 87-5 and seeks to have this matter remain open and coi inued until the next available hearing date of May 18, 19V Please notify the undersigned, the Applicant, and the LaW,ord as to the disposition of this request for continuance. Also, please note that the Landlord' s address for notices Lot Business Prop:rties, 17621 Pitch, P.O. Box 19596, Irvine, CA 92713-9596 . Should you have any questions, please call. Ver t my yours# OAL A. IG J'R. W tdr cat Jams A. chr istaft"s jos"h To 11i tllouC Ow/ Ideb Mrva a" oar re F � Pvbl it11i �/ 7 �► TO MANNIN COIMISSYON PEN AL d� WrIcs 1b U Qrv= that he Hunt gton beach city co usicci 1 wi l l bold a public hearing in the Council Chorber at the Huntington Mach Civic COnter . 2000 Rain street , Huntington beach, California, on the date a>aO at the tim indicated below to receive and consider the stateraeat$ of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below, 9=: Monday, May 6, 1987 Tr : 7 : 00 PH #1P-PL-T-QjjQN NIS B : Use Permit No. 87-5 - Appeal filed by laappost Pizza I&CATION: 10056 Adams Avenue (southeast corner of Brookhurst Street and Adams Aver,ue) : Appeal of the Planning Commission ' s denial of a request to permit a pizza restaurant at an existing retail center . M1201MRTAL-STATUS: Categorically exempt Class 1 , Section 15301 . California Environmental Quality Act Od FIIZ,: A copy of the above described appeal is on file in the Department of Development Services . A:.L Z11'7'tRES7LD PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outline above . All applications, exhibits , and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 { Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, for inspection by the public . If theme are any further questions , please call Laura Phillips , Assistant Planner , at 536-5271 . HUW In=N 9ZACH CITY COUNC I L dr: Alicia M. 1fantworth City Clerk Phone (716) 536- 5405 ('792") w R : F ST CLASS MA L i f . Publish 4/21/81 ; Al. TO _ . „ 11p t"j BSI a1M OEM 1 OF USE PEWIT 87-5 8 TICR is Now" Glyn that tb* Hunt iragton beach City COVOCi l Will hold a public hestisb in the Council Chamber at the Nuetingtos Beech Civic Center. 2000 Nain itroot , Huntington reach, Calitatuie, os the date and at the tima indicated below to receive and consider the stat4l ants of all persona who wish to be hoard relative to the application described beloo. am : Monday, May 4 , 1987 7 : 00 P" Use Permit No . 81-5 - Appeal Filed by Law"'It Pirrs 10056 Adams Avenue ( southeabt cornet of 1lrookhurst Street and Adams Avenue) Appeal of the Planning Commission ' s denial of a request to permit a pizza restaurant at an existing ratal.1 center . ILNYIBQMVMAL STATI : Categorically exempt Class 1 , Section 15301 , 1 California Environmental juality Act On E� E : A copy of the above described appeal is on file in the Department of Development Services . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and espress opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above . All applications , exhibits , and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 !lain Street , Huntington beach, California , for inspection by the public . It there aro any futt►+er questions, please call Laura Phillips , Assistant Planner , at 536-5271 . HU*T 111=A BEACH CITY COU11C I L by : Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone ( 714 ) 536-5005 Y . r NoTta to CLM 10 boom MKtC MtMIn '; tTEN ter* ,AM TO: CUM CLERK'S DfftCE DATE: I PUAK 1EDil4E A %w iC wu m Ust u rN[ ATTACMED LEGAL NOTICE 00 TK A* DAY (W 1 Ni. vffrs are attached AP's will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Comm ssion Punning Departwment Petition • Appea 1 Other Adoption of Environmental SWUS (A) UK Nis City Attorney's Office barn YES NO informed of forthcoming public hearing? Refer to PlannierD De"rawt filtM1004M, J, for MW i ti Oal i nformat i oa. +� If owl , please tramai t exact Mrdi w! to bt r+egeInd In tAh Is"I . "- 1S /NIR AN APPULAW 0EKLOM (COASTAL 0M0PWN1 FM7 A.OW �lMY Y R V Y,{ M 1. �•' • ( r 4u , a Y. G� Y ,• r,l A�"'`. .Jn :'i " 7, iun. :!_ �.�H,•:IIv.I:rai�.�..m•� e r gave air&1 ,- 1 1 lrisestom C1r. 5. 186� N1wIA My•tlastoft o CA D=119Y o Tw RR M 92646 20101 TAXw►XX CI R AUNT I NGION BXWN CA 102444 G . i�i5- 1�1-16 1 . 15�-1n1-09 SKINNER , CARL A CHRYSONr , GEHAI.0 E' 20191 TANnANK C I R 20191 PR I NCETON C 1 It I IUNT I NG,TON BEACH , CA HUNTINGTON BEACII , CA 92646 2 . l�ri- lJl- lU HOUPOLI 0 RICHARD 7. 155- 191- 17 20181 PRINCL"TON c:llt MENKE , DALE S IIUN*riN(;,i,oN UI:,1Co , CA "(;1K*.! TANBANK C111 11UNTIN61-ON BEACH , CA ��c1G I 1 i 3 . 155-191 -11 8. 1 Cif,- 1�J1-111 WWUS , f REUI:R I CK W CACHRE S , ROURT G 20182 im I NCETON C l It 10121 ►IFRED ITH V11 HUNTI NGTON IIE ACII , CA HUNT I NGTON UEACI1 , CA J 92046 I 4 . 155-191-12 9. 155-191-20 i L.AMZAWMTA 9 RAYMOND 2ELT314 0 JAMES N 20102 PR I NC2"m C I R 10131 MKRZD I TU 0R BUNTIMG?w WAC1I9GA UUNT1MG" m ACM f CA N l2"s I' y , t: vzuA. fell i ! 00MV 0 b b A� 10141 MOMITO be WILAIRW O DAVID IF OW11`1I 0100 MiACN j 4A lom Avow Avg 92046 MtM INOTOA alwAs feu l lmu M o 11 . 155-191-32 Ia. 155-181-04 JARAMILLO, LYNN 1, TR IX)MNEY SAVINi:lI M 10A11 10151 MEREDITH DR ASSN HUNTINGTON NEACII , CA D51. ACCr'TC DEPT. 9304G P.0. Dox 6050 COSTA M93A , CALI MM I A 9262G 12. 155-191-23 17. 155-181-05 MOPE-1.1-0 , RONALI) It D OWNSY SAVINGS & LOAN 1001 MKIMMITII DR ASSN 11UNT I NGTOM UEACII , CA D31. ACCTG imirr. J 1 6.1 11.O . WX GOSU CWTA MUSA , CALIFORNIA 92620 13. 155-191-15 18 . 155-181-13 ZI'i` KU, SAUL DURIAM I1(MAN G 70171 LAMSON l.N 20151 VIVA C I R HUN'TINGTON BEACH , (7A IIUNTINCTUN UEACII , CA 14 . 155-175-02 19 . 155-151-14 MCCIA)S KEY , GORWO P rR I MSC11, MARK 201 n LAMMM LP 20131 VIVA C I R IIUNTI NCTI 1 nAcu l A ' ! IIUNTi NC.TON 5"c"VM CA it Sam VIVA till •IfItIL�r� r�tx �r 41 OU NTI N4" mamm, CA 1IQia r I VA clik- UUNTISOMM MISS CA J 1 • IS5-181�17 18 • 155-11�1-21 YO')N, UOWLAS MAN WIC119R 11" l DAVID 1. 20111 VIVA CIIt 20W2 VIVA CIIt HUNT I NG`I"ON DRAC11 , CA IIUNT I NGTON OUCH o CA 926441 92046 22 . 155-181-17 1.11TES , ,1UF G 27 . 155-162-06 20101, VIVA r 111 J01INSONO JKFYRRY R IIUMI•I N(i'I*ON UEACI I , CA 20071 I.A9AON l•N 92G4G IIUN'1'IMMUN ONACH , CA 02646 i 23 . 155-.181-18 � 111,ANT—UASON , 11 I LLI AM K 28 . 155-162-07 j 20091 VIVA CII1 QUIN". QUgwrm 1) l HUNTI NGTON BRACII , CA 20081 LAM Im 92G-16 HUNTINGTON 019AC11 , CA li2tT4li I i 24 . 155-181-19 LA MARCIIB, R I CHARD A 10. 155-162-01 20061 VIVA C I R Lt)OBAT, IJRBA I INS G HUNT I NGT'ON BSACII, ^A 20011 I.AWKW LN 9284E RUIRT I NG'IOP &SA 91046 CA IIA � Az LIX G 38. 165- 64-84 1 LAB EM n,A> aT T somw C owspom mucNo CA 10212 CIR mum po"m r wu l CA 0 31 . 153-162-03 36. 155-054-83 (dX0DI N , JAMS U MR 1 SACC, W)OK t ICK J 20031 LAWSON I.N 10210 A3cor Clq HUNT I NGTON DEACII , CA H UNT I NGTON UBACH , CA 02640 92646 32. 155- 162-04 JOIINCOLA . RUD0l.P11 37 . 155-054-54 20051 LAM50N LN 11ASYK, ARTY HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 10208 ASCOT CIR 926,16 HUNTI NGTON DRACH , CA 92646 33 . 155-162-05 3b. 155-054-85 GALLUP , BREWSTER 0 Tit PETERSUN , VIVIAN L 20061 LAWSON LN 10206 ASCOT C1R IIUNTI NGTON BEACH , CA HUNT I NG'TON DIACH, CA 02646 02646 34 . 155-054-81 IIRYDMJ, EWA 30, 155-054-86 10214 ASCOT C I R DOV K , CHR I S"PHIM K HUNT IXGTOX SUCH CA 21062 OCILANVIXV LN 62046 HUNT I NGTON UACU O CA 92"d o f OR , , 46Is 0�8t coollolm ail LD s VA is lam di a 1O174 A�COR Cie utw i rIG $244o 41. 155-036+7 4 ors . 15�i-U33-8q U6811I NG O D I AN DUNCAN , U81Am 10242 ASCOT CIli 10170 ASCO.1' CIA HUNTINGTON BEAC119 CA IIUNTINGT(NI U"Cii, CA ll�u�c; v2u4U i 42 . 155-054-79 ZAGKIt j I)I:NN I S 47. 155-053-90 10362 MA I KA I 011 R011 I NSON IIOLLAMII L IIUNT 1 NCTON DRACII , CA 10178 ASCOT C l it 926-16 IIUN'1'IW;T'ON UKACIIl CA V2646 i 43 . 155-054-50 48 . 255-053-741 KLEINMAN , PAUL 11 3NOtUON , KNNNliTu J 1U216 ASCOT C111 � HUNTI NGTON DEACII . CA 9382 CANULgW" DR 0264(i IIUNTI NGT'ON I39AC110 CA 92646 44. 155-053-87 49. 155-053=82 C1U N0l 1.lDOMAND D PXffGIIA. LUCY MAY 1"38 P I CCAD I LLY LN 10111 YA LLST FGR VR AUNT 1 NG"iON MACH , CA HUNT I Nt TON 11AACII s CA 92646 92646 see M 1xv WIT MI A 2062 M T1w111 AUN II TIMN' !I siACl� CA AMANIN A 51, 155-053-84 56. 155-4C1-28 UMK 1 . ADBLINR C NKVAUA INVIL'!'l SM 10106 ASCOT C I R IKl 14)1 Ws I NC IIUWrlt*."WN DEACII CA SUM 230 92646 12U Conk muss NARK U!1 UB1.ItAY UICACIS 0 Fl. 33445 52 . 155-053-95 57 . 151 -461 -29 PASSAVAN-r, 11K.11MAN U PACI VIC 30UT11VZST IIKALTT NASSAVANT, 11F.T1'Y F % C:OIaN 'TAz 1120-12 9130 10168 ASCOT C 111 P.O. IM 2097 TiUtli ANMKX IIUNTINGTUN UBACII , CA IDS ANliK AS 9 CA 53. 155-053-86 NI KUI.SKY * DONNA DET11 58 . 155-271-29 10170 ASCOT C 111 MUNOz o 110DENT It 11UNT I NGTON DBAC119 CA 9971 K 1 NC3 CYN OR 926,IG HUN'TING"1'ON Ul1AC11, CA 92040 54 . 15 5-401-3# 8119LL 011. co S9. 151-371-30 B23TSM TAX RXG laid Z91 CKLXR, DAMI XL p.a. DDX 2099 20102 RUNNING tlPRlwis LM IIVUNT% TX HUNTINGTON Di#CR , CA 77252 RSA tl rrtrr BEAM CA 4310 M-051-07 65 . 155-181-24 FA I NUARG, ALLAN Tit OUSI NKW PAapi"1 s 300 V 1 A L I D0 NORU NAIITNK2811 19 00, , to NEWPORT BEACII , CA 1741 • KA'1'ULA AVK 02GG3 ANAllsim a CA 92604 155-051-10 T11061PSON , JOHN i' P.O. BOX 719 DALLAS , TX (3y. 1��-Ua1-11 CK3 UEVEllopm tNT co BANK OE AMERICA TAX UEPT #324 5 P.O. DOX 3700 $AN P1t ncisCO3 CA 94137 I I I 64 . 155-051-12 MULL I LUTZR C Tit am I LL 0 KQOU T 11 2750 3 WR i NG ST i taana SWU, CA moo . _ 1 { oa-d18 709 1��•1� • 20141 LAWN IANX mmimolum 92"s 66 • 1S5-1g1-08 11O0PNER, MAE 71 . 155-193-01, ANDERSON , MAR J NAYiAN, WILLIAM A 10011 MENZDITII UI'.1 VE 10012 IIzatol"I DRIVE HUNTINGTON DEACII , CA HUNTING'1'ON O"cill, CA 926-16 9264G 67 . 155-191-13 72 . 155-162-Ob IXE 9 JOHN N TR Voaui ptt t NCt:'t'nN C i r�Ct.>•: Kta,t.Y , CgYA K AUNT I N(iTON UE:�1(.'ll , CA1UU91 I,/IM5ON I.ANti � 9�G�1 G IIUN7'{NGTOK BEAC11 , CA 92646 68 . 155-191- 14 73 . 155- 162-00 ZEI'EIIA , J01IN A NATSONt KENNETH w 20201 TANBARK CIIICI.E 20101 I.AW&* LARS IIUNTING'I'ON BEACH , CA IIUNTINGTOO 66AC11, CA 92G46 U:I�3.1ii 69. 155-191-18 74 . 155--162-03 NATALI R, ALBERT GLOW a tRA KLIX P 30193 TANURK CIRCLE 2001 LAMM LADE IIUPT I NGTOO BRACII, CA NOT t IIIi sucu 0 CA 92646 92646 �O�tq►� K��� J �zMBR'�� At.��! sw�Yas atw�orl 4Aj1E "IN [A� LAND pI11 INGTON B"cu r CA 110m exAm s CA 92644 70. 155.-171-05 e 1 . 155-172-04 RU33E1.1.0 .1011N M OARNKS , tA3UIS E 20161 1.AVSON I.ANE 10222 N IACRA t*i VE t1UN7'I%"fW 09AC11 + CA IIUNTIN(;T'ON tIEACII s CA 92646 92646 I i 71 . 155-171-06 SAND tX)I,1,Ait DEV INC V►OGOYEM HETIREMENT 94. 155-053-72 11tUST M11Adq MERRITT G 10371 BEACH ULVI) 4683 V 133 RU $TEEIt'f SUITE 240 HAW THORNE t CA 111INT I NGIMN BEACH , CA 90250 92646 10 . 155-172-01 STRINDECK 9 BEVERLY JEAN 20122 LAWSON LANE HUNTINGTON BEACII, CA 91046 79 . 155-172-02 BR I TT o LLOYD O 20112 LAR341f LAME 11U NT I NGTDII BEACH , CA 92646 X01AOMIN411AcII Lanz ,� �VIN � Lm MUNI INC UACI, CA WTIMOWN I CA e r 83. 155-162-02 88. 155-161-07 COPPLSOGRg CHARLES GRADY 36LIAILIo LAW29 19 N 20022 LAWSON LANE 20042 L.AW90P LAXI HUNTINCTON BEACH , CA HUNTINGTON BUCK , CA 92646 92646 84 . 155-161-13 89. 155-161-08 KING, EDITli CE'CILIA RUSSCI, JASPER 20032 LAWSON LANE 20081 LAWSON LAWN HUNTINGTON ©EACil , CA 11UNTINGTON BEAC119 CA 92646 92646 II 85. 155- 161-04 90. 155-161-09 IMPELL I ZZER I , JACK RUDABAUGH s JAMUS G 20052 LAWSON LANE 20071 COLGATZ HUNT I NGTON BEACH , CA HUNTINGTON BAACl1 o CA 92646 92646 86. 115-161-05 91 . 155-161-10 RICAAWON , HXX RT N UN I NS o BDlAAD M 20062 LAWSOP LANs 20061 COLGATZ NtINT I NGTON MACHO CA MAI Ni�`''L ON MACHO CA A2�8 1 get WAR 0 1&=41 A "ITS a LURLM MOTUN VA3 IM I CA �Mlf' UACV s CA NN�08 96. 155-053-74 101 . 155-053-80 JOHNS , ROBERTA T DATEY I JOUN E 10156 ASCOT C 111CLS 209 DUNES 08 IIUNTINGTON UEACH, CA MORRO We CA 92U46 93442 97 . 155-053-75 102 . 155-053-61 EAIWER , HELEN 1, F1iENC119 JAMES 10134 ASCOT CIRCLE 10100 ASCOT CIRCLE IIUNTI NGTON DEAC119 CA 11UNT1 NGTt7N OXACH i CA 92646 9264G 98 . 155-053-77 103. 151-271-32 CARMICIIAEL, MARY J I)UWsAN, J011N F 10152 ASCOT CIRCLE 20192 RUNNING SPRINC3 LAKE 11UNT'INGTON DEAC11 , CA 11UNTINGTON GRACU , CA 92646 02646 99. 155-053-75 JNCKWN g BARBARA L 104 . 151— 271-33 10154 ASMT C I RCLS R04Y, R I CUARD NWT I NIGTON 8EACN , CA 20202 SUNNING SPRINGS LAKE 92646 HUNTINGTON IIEACtl r CA 92646 �1C11aR� 0 1�•• M�T � Wivx eM�o1 u4cal CA mumillsom NwM, CA 115. 155-193-05 120. 155-193-10 ABBABCIA, GEORGE dI 9IMIA, AL,FM C 10072 MEREDITH DittVE 50 PAIRLAKS HUNTING'tON BEACH, CA IRVING. CA 92646 92714 11E3 . 155- 193-OG 121 , 155-193- 11 WHEELER , RICHARD J PAW)D1 , AN70Rto 10082 MEREDIT11 DRIVE 10132 MEREDITH DRIVE 11UNT I NGTON BEACII , CA HUNT I NGTON BEACH, CA 92646 92646 I 117. 155-193-07 122. 155-193-12 9EXLER t ROBERT MICHAEL TR A I LEY , CHARL13 JO 10002 MEREDITH DRIVE 10142 MEREWT11 DRIVE 11UNTINGTON SEACll j CA HU'NTINGTON BEACH , CA 92646 92646 118 . 153-193-06 123. 15S-193-13 TW*P60N, KEliNETH R LIpBE'"C, HARRY L P.0, 902 5406 10152 ItXMITN DkIVK ORA NG3 9 CA HUNT I NGUM NUCN, CA 9"13 92646 i IT gain LAMING onI"s LAMS �0 4X0 11"m• CA IIt111T I M4'l�Olt Wj� � 63646 106. 151-271-35 111 . 151-271-27 CAMPBELL i OSCAR B AR I MURA , MASAO 20222 RUNNING SPRINGS LANE 9951 KINGS CANYON WIVE IIUNTI N(:TON BEACH , CA IIUNTI NG7v* OXACH O CA 92646 9264U 107. 155-172-36 112 . 155-1 B3-02 CARROWo JOSEPH It Fa)MARDS 9 J9ANB'ITE JOAN 10221 WESIXY CIRCLE 10032 MKRM)ITII DRIVE HUNT I NGTON BEAC11 , CA IIUNT I NGIMM DEACIl , CA 92646 926.16 93 . 155-161-12 ION . 151-272--16 ZIMUKRMAM, ERIC F STERKEL, MANUAL. W 20071 COLGATZ 9952 K I NGAS CANYON ROAD HUNTI NGTON BEACH , CA HUNTI NGTCNi BEACH , CA 92646 92646 109. 151-272-17 113. 151-193-03 GE AND O DOR I S N D9 ROCC1O$ CLaKM J "51 MANUM DRIVE IL004 2 MsM I TIll DRIVE HUNTI NGTON DSACH . CA IIUNT I NGTCNI ma. CA 92646 92646 134« IW193-14 ' NoTm, 10142 Sa rTo DRITS inaTorr suet, CA 125. 155--172-25 RONA0 MARK M 10211 WZ8LXY CIRCLE HUNTINGTON 89ACH , CA 92646 t 126 . 155- 161-13 ROACH , HAROLD If 20021 COLGATE IIVXTINGTON BEACH , CA 92646 127 , 155.-161- 14 FEEXE , V J 20011 COLGATE HUNTINGTON BEACH , CA 92F46 92. 155-261-11 MCYLROY, PHILLIP 0 20051 COLOATZ HUN I'INGTON SUCH O CA 92646 WYE PLEASE rSCMEDO A PUBLIC. J1IlI NCIL ` ft MY OF • I .. � � •• - CIS ., ,1 `I'.'F�Y�: tiL�• � f • i..' . s are attached' r • .l t AP' s wi l 1 iol icw ^^ • { r �� yt l: r + + NO Ap' s Initiated by . Planning Commission Planning Ccparuaen: :rvircnr.en a Ststut t Ci ty a ; t.,rney' s 0" ice been YES MD irf„rnmec of forthcoming publ is �r :ring' �7 •_� • r( 1Ir Planning Department - Extension r t f r• r to _. aLVOLla i_1.1_L _ foi- additional infarnaticn , 04 ` • ' • i t Peal , alea ,e transAi t exact wording to Olt required 1n tl� Algal ., IS THLS AN APPEALABLE DEYELDPtENT ,'(CWT•AL bEYELOP-4tV `�IIt,TiTa ...�.,�. • YE y yr•4 r•r lr i, ,T� • , .44. - •1.. r. • L .r Ake r~ �. 4P11th d/ti/dt MPEAL TO PLAMlI I NG tClS'M I ON DENIAL OF USE PEN(I S 81-5 PoTiCE is xnny Gives that the Huntington Mach City CoutCi i Will hold a public hearing in the Council Cbawber at the Huntington k.sch Civic Center, 2000 Main street, Huntington beach, Califoruis, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider thu statownts of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the applieshion described below . I a=: Monday, May 4 . 1967 j T 7 : 0 0 P'M dPP dlQUI r i1LM== Use Permit No . 87-5 Appeal i led by, LMOPP>Ost Piste I.QCAi•ION : 10056 Adams Avenue ( southeast_ cornet of orookhurst Street and Adams Avenue ) pROPOIAL : Appeal of the Planning Consuission ' s denicl of a request to permit a pizza restaurant at an existing retail center . ,_STAZU5 : Categorically exempt Class 1 , section 15301 , California Environm*ntal Qsality A( t QN FILE : A copy of the above described 2ppe+a l is on file in the Department of 13eve ? opmer,: Sirvices . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidonce for or against the application as outlined above . All applications . exhibits . and descriptions of this proposal air on file with the Office of the City Click, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California , tot inspe*ctioa by the public . If there are any further questions , please tall Lours Phillips , Assistant Planner , at 536--5271 . HUNT I NCTON BEACH CITY COUX t L By : Alicia M. Wentworth City Cleark Phone (714) 536-5405 (751Sd) VF OF 64tA111'1i11r1PJ1WM 300 MAIN STRIET CALIFORNIA dM �Tt�C1T1►�tN1i li May 1987 Hal A. Young , Jr. . Attorney at Law 3146 Redhi l l avenue. Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its rogwlsr meeting held May 4 . 1987 granted your request for continuance of the pwbl is hearing oii Use permit No. 137-5 to the regular weeting of :!ay 18. 19pi . at 7 :00 ' X i Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk A.%:bt r�w� tMiM�� CW wv� W MAIN STREIT CALIFOWAI IA off 0'TM am C1Arlli May 5. 1987 Lamppost Pizza , Inc. 1585 Sunland Lang Costa Mesa. CA 92626 Attn: Joe Wa1thour The City Counci ' of the City of Huntington Beach at its r"ular meting held May 4, 1981 granted your request for continuance of the public hearing on Use Pervit No. 87.5 to the regular meting of May 18, 1987 , at 7:00 p.m. Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk AMW: bt }} �'•' C'Owr+ golf �ly��/�'7 �svl/1•A► ee�i► ►'41y 4 v 1987 3 Ah'r &VOW14A . V.,$ A rio or Dear Council Member-at Thank you for allooting me to voice my opinion on the move of 0041 lampost Pi%%s from their present location to 1005E Adana Aire. 4A ,*-##-- Ordinarily, if would not meke a greet deal of difference to 0'#r#'Nw us in Meredith Gardens what type of business is placed in •� the Albertson •s Shbpping Center. However. where Lampost wishes to cove has a amall parking lot surrounded by buildings and it in like an echo chavAber. All the sounds rises up and the westerly winds glow it right into our homes . N'.y neiphbor told me he thought there we$ someone in his uput;airs . when he went up he found that his wife had left 'the tipstairs window open and the noise was cortinr from. pounding inside the new stores. Can you i rarl ne' what the v i tua t i on will tie Ir Larp►os t moves in with its video f;Ar.es , Leer and ita teen And young adult crowd? I can Just hear '.ho.-e car redion boorrinf', it I out to :gee who s the l oude.n t . We , in -',eredi th don ' t went to keep callir.f- the i�olice to. : ulvt then dov:r. zio we clan sleep. But we ce+rtni nIj will . Another Droner is ' raf fic throtsrh our tri)c ' . leriions leaving the propo-sed 1.hTl,or.t yni•kint- lot rust turn r j-ht c,r. Adarm . :tie next a tre!et : c :.awt- on, ,i rs t rti it-h t u t :rest ror 3 t,lcc ks tl:rouj-h our tract . 1 ^ran ttst nee : a.-' post ' s ;'ntrons usir:#• our r- treet for a rncaway . 1t 10 tad er,IL,ur•h now . Lampont ►Jan cleared up the f•Ar1 H,•e on the out;r,ide of their trash cons which we pointed out at th,e laz:t plonnirf• corr.rAlLsion meet- itir , 3ut why do they ree.,�d outsidern to tel t them It is un- healthful and will draw rats? 0 1 A-L;w Xen Dorothy 1 taon �►iith 1/��/dT AMAL To LW OF W)TICK YS KLO? GIVEN that t1hi M�t ington Much City Council will hold s public hearing in the Council Chaaber at the Hunti"ton Brach Civic Centex , 2000 Main Streit, Huntington Mach , California , on the date and at the tine indicated below to receive and considet the staterntt of all persons who wish to be heard telative to the application desctibed bellow . QA,T Monday, May 4 , 1967 7 : 00 pM APP'LlCATIQe K MIBELR : Use Permit No . 57- 5 - Appeal Filed by lamppost Pitt• W hligm : 10056 Adams Avenue ( southeast Corner of Rrookhurst Street and Adams Avenue) P-M_ m : Appeal of the Planning Commission ' s denial of a request to permit a pizza restaurant at an assisting retail center . YI ROMPM _STATUS : Categorically eacapt Clans 1 , Section 1530.1 , California Environ•-.antal Quality Aut 0d_,_LILS: A copy of the above desctibed appeal is on file in the Department of Development Services . ALL INTERES7ED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications , exhibits , and descriptions of j this propomal are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Mach, Cali !ornia , for inspection by the public . if there art any turthor questions , please call Laura Phillips , Assistant Planner . at S36-5271 . KUYT X PM0 DEACM C I TY COUPC I L by: Alicia 14. Wentworth City Clerk Fftane (714) 536-5405 1 ( 7924d) i _ + i1 �' • ZV I CKLRR I 201a1 RUNNING SPRI Coo LN IIUN'T1NO-Ttim DNACIIl CA 62646 • FIPST CLASS MAL i i I ..1 ' ilk 4/23/87 l Al' 70 PIANM1INS CtIMf41SSION KNIA1 OF NOT= is HCRM GIVU that t dunntisgton notch City Council will hold a public h*srinq in the Couzwil Cher at the ttuatin9toa Sesch Civic Center, 2000 Main Streset$ lluntington peach, Catirorwia, on the d4t6 Sind at the time indicated below to receive and coasidor the st4tesaents of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. {ATE: Mandar Ney 4 , 1567 : 7:00 Pit . APpLIC3►T„IOr Use Permit No. 87-5 - Appeal Filed by Laeppost pill• 10056 Adams Avenue ( southeast corner of orookhurst Street and Adams Avenue) Appeal of the Planning Commission ' s denial of a request to permit a pica# rostuurant at an existing retail center . =Igo AL_fiTATit,S : Categorically esemmpt Class 1 , Section 15301 , Calitornia Environmental Quality Act oil FILF : A copy of the above described appeal is on file in the Department of Development Services . ALL INTERESTtD PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evi,!ence for or against, the applicatin*: as outlined above. All applications , exhibits , and descriptions of this proposal are on filo with the Office of the City Clock, 2000 Main Street , Huntington breach, California , for inspection iDy the public . It there are any further questions , please, Coll Laura Phillips , Assistant planner , at 536-5271 . WM'Y'I MC'1'oN ■BACM C r TY C W I L bj►: Alicia N. Wentworth City Click Phone ( 714 ) 536 -Sgh3 i 7SZrd) i ti.�. '" m 89. is Rusup BPER 2008 )iU1/Tx M , RrACH , CA +_r OF R2"8 SST CLASS MAO. k �. Mael :: r fly FRI Mr �r C� CA Mai 7�i r�rt�rt . i1SS-181-24 . � bus i nwrss pr rt 1•s partnership No. 15 1741 M. Ratll l a Ave. Attn: ftivin R. Sct"ntr Anaheim. CA 92804too C, I ST GABS MAL i 11sh 4l25/87 TQ tMNS C01'!iI SSIONI KN7AL OF USE PdRiT ey-S !MGrIC$ id HZUVY GYV= that the Huntington Mach City Council will hold a public hearia$ in the Council Chamber at the Huntington mooch Civic Center, 2000 Main $treat. Huntington teach, California, an the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be beard relative to the application described below , W= : Ibnday, May 4 , 1987 TMW : y ; 0 0 PM UPLI CAI tQY JOAN g: Use Permit 'No . 87-5 - Appeal Filed by Lrwaost �z�C•' 14=1TON: 10056 Adams Avenue ( southtnst corner of Nrookhurst Street and Adams Avenue) pg , : Appeal of the Planning Connission ' s dtnial of a r8gue5t to permit a pizza restaurant at an existing retail center , i ZKY Y T11$ : Categorically exempt Class 1. , Section 15301 , California Environmental Quality Act Q ( EtLE : A copy of the above described appeal is on file in the Department of Development Services . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and os press opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above . All applications , exhibits , and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clark, 2000 Main Street, Huntington leach , California, for inspection by the public . If there are any further Questions , please call Laura Phillips , Assistant Planner , at S16- S2-- 1 . MUMr't I NGMV NZACN C I TV C UPC I 4 By : Alicia 14 . Wentworth City Click Phone ( 714 ) 536-5405 (7$2") s . 11�1f�rMr �1«M*A.CA UM t i(,fie, , 0. 155-053-83 N#11•rll, It00911•C F. r 8055 rRESNO CIIt UNIT #501 A HUNTI NGTON UNACII , CA 92646 am, 55 REum f To T S 1lAAL NO F�IM am .,, F'IR� 4il�.A 3 uNV" TO Fa v i k a t 1 i CKs�e � APPEAL TO PLAININGCOl I SIAM DENIAL Of USE PEWIT 87-5 NOTICE is HEALnY GIVEN that the Huntington beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Dosch Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington poach, California, on the dote and it the time indicated below to receive and consider the stateients of all persons .iho wish to be heard relative to the application described belor. . M Monday, May 4 , 1987 rim : 7: 0 0 PK &MICATION_ g : Use Permit *No. '87-5 - Appeal Filed by Law Post Pura i tQM: 10056 Adams Avenue (southeast Corner of bro.okhurst Street and Adams Avenue) PROPOSAL: Appeal of the Planning Commission' s denial of a request to permit a r .ssa restaurant at an existing retail center . FAIN18 CAL SIMS: Categorically exempt Class 1 , Soction 15301 , Calizorns a Rnvirunawntal Quality Act 0 FILE: A copy of the above described appeal is on file in the Department of Development Services . I i i ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All applications. eshibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the office of the City Clerk, 2000 Moin Street, Huntington beach. California, for inspez-tion by the public . If there ire any further questions , pleas* Call Laura Phillips , Assistant Planner , at 526-5271 . KW I P G700 BENCH CITY COUPC I L By ; Alicia M. frntworth City Clerk Phone (714 ) 526-S+05 J (7g28d) as*" rot .. k� OrmhokCAl 77 . 155-171-OG SAND UOW.AR DXV INlf4 ., RUPLOYESS RRTIREMEN1%, ���- CIO TRUST `v o 10371 BEACH Ut,VU �� b SUITE. 240 HUNTI NGTON BEACH, CA W 92G4G Fmk` CLASS MAIL it APPEAL TO PLANING COMP!I SS I ON OEN I ill OF ► MOTICs i5 KIMBY GIYE11 that the Hunnatington reach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Choodwr at the Huntington beach Civic Center , 2000 Nain Street, Huntington beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. QA,E : Mondays May 4 , 1987 TZ : 7: 00 PM ' Use Permit No. 57-5 - Appeal Filed by Lowpost Pizza r U= 19K: 10056 Adams Avenue (southeast corner of 1lcookhurst r Street and Adams Avenue) p�QpQ�1w,: Appeal of the Planning Commission' s denial of a request ' to permit a pizza restaurant at an existing retail center . Categorically exempt Class 1 , Section 15301 , California Environmental Quality Act ON IFj,L A copy of the above described appeal is on file in the Department of Development Services . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing 9 and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above . All applications, exhibits, and deseciptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of the Citr Clark, 2000 Main Street, Huntington leach, California , for inspection by the public. If there are any further questions , please call Laura Phillips , Assistant Planner , at 536-S271 . mLq"11NG,1r0If BEACH CITY COUNC I L by : Alicia M. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (716) $36-5406 i (752M) 'e7 i To : Planning Coamiss ion/Development Services Frua: Stepnen C . Roesch Date : 2-9-87 Subject : Conditional Use Permit No . 87-1 After considering the extreme reactions of my neighbors and evaluating the opt ions available , I have dec idad that it appears to be in the best interest of the neigghborhood to request that the Conditional Use Permit No . S7-1 be withdrawn . After modif icnt ion to the design I wi�l apply for a standard build;ag permit for a room addition with a wet bar . Thank you for the approval and I hope the withdrawal does not create any problems with the Planning Commission . Sincerely l KUM V a r � 40 CITY HUN"00 CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATI01116 • + • f O N0410!!A!!LC MAYM AND CITY COthiC I LNM Z= P MdM COUNCIL Mil TM MU and ALICIA M8' IWM TH, City Clark MlMQt APPUL OF PLANNING COMISSIdp DAT8 PibrUary 4, 1947 DECISION of 2/3/37 AS TO CUP 87-1 9872 LhPWORTH CIRCLE I hereby request an appeal to Planning Comission decision on Cite 87-1 for the following reasons: 1) Apartment units in this tract will have an adverse iapact on traffic, propsrty values , and the current R-1 designation for this area' 2) The Planning Comission based this deefaion Without having a clear knowledge of State lens regarding granny units , 3) The planning Comission did not seek Legal advice from the City Attorney concerning the city's ability to either reject or accept these types of units in R-1. housing traits, 4) The homeowner ' s CCitt' s do not allow for this type of unit, and r) The demign of this extra unit will have an &d~1W iepact on the area. TM:bb ` cc: City Administrator City Attorney ti i 1 Vigo �y r^