Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditional use permit 88-31 - Mark F. O'Donnell - To permit 8 . 0 SUBnrvrsror; nMMEZ: Not applicable . w 9 . C, ISSUES- AND ANALYSIS.: Nan-ConfQ-'ITina Asvects of the Site Although the subject dwelling is addressed on Joliet Avenue, the site frontage facing Delaware Street is narrower, and therefore considered by. Code to be the front property line . The structure is set back three feet from the front property line on Delaware Street and one foot from the exterior side property line along Joliet Avenue . The Code requires a 15 foot front sathack and a 5 foot exterior side yard setback. After, the required street dedication For the corner radius , the main dwelling will not only encroach into the setbacks, but will also project approximately 50 square feet into the public right-of-way and approximately 220 square feet into the required corner cutoff (see Attachment 4 ) . An existing one-car garage is located at zero foot setback along the interior side and rear property lines in lieu of the required 5 feet and 7 . 5 feet , respectively. The one-car garage is also non-conforming because a two-car garage is currently required for single family dwellings . Lastly, the garage and dwelling unit are separated by approximately 3 feet , while the Code currently requires a 1.0 foot separation between buildings . Z12titlgment History* �x The -. fallowing is a brief chronology of events concerning this application. . May 3 , 12aa.. A building permit was issued by the Department of Community Development for a number of alterations to the existing structure . It was the understanding of the Planning staff that the exterior walls of the non-conforming structure would not be impacted , and therefore, the modifications would j fall under Code Section 9652 ( a) , which permits interior repairs/alterations and re -roofing for health and safety purposes . May J . 1988 . A building inspector ' s notice indicated that the work undertaken on the site did not match that shown on the plans , and that preli.ainary work had begun without benefit of building permits . May 5�. UU. F stop work order was issued by Land Use Enforcement for possible non-compliance with Code Section 9652(b) , regarding exterior alterations to a non-conforming structure. The applicant was required to submit revised plans to the plan checker for verification of uetback and property line dimensions . r„ Staff P.eport -- 8/16/38 -4- (1087d) MAj 25, 1288 . A letter was sent from Mike Strange , Senior Planner, to Mark O 'Donnell , stating that a conditional use permit application would need to be filed based on the non--conforming provisions of the Code and the type of work to be undertaken ( i .e. complete refraining of the major room closest to Delaware) . o �ulY 12 . 19U. A letter was sent !prom Mike Adams , Planning Director, to ?lark O' Donnell , again stating the requirement for :- "filing of a conditional use permit and conditional exception. (Staff has since determined that a conditional exception is not • requi red) . JUIY 15A. 1988 . Application for Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 filed . £ .4.E_. Nph C n f o x.� i nQ P.r.Qv W a s 1 The intent of the non-conforming provisions of the Code is to . protect the public health, safety, and welfare by restricting: the improvement of nonconforming structures to those modifications necessary for health and safety, and/or to bring the aesthetics of the structure into conformance with the neighborhood , The { provisions are intended to allow minor alterations that do not extend the reasonable expected life of the structure, and expressly prohibit such major alterations as increasing the floor .area by more than -10 percent , or increasing the number of stories . Within these •�� limitations, .the Planning Commission has discretion over requested ' exterior alterations . it is staff ' s determination that this proposal does not constitute a minor alteration in conformance with the intent of the Code . 1t involves re-roofing and substantial demolition and rebuilding of one room (except foundation) , relocation of the kitchen , dining room, living rooms bedroom, and bathroom, and new plumbing and electrical wiring . Although the exterior appearance of the duelling would undoubtedly be improved, the proposal essentially involves replacement of major, portions of the structure , thus greatly increasing the expecteu life of the structure . Because of the extreme degree of non -conformity in the setbacks , staff feels that it Would not be appropriate to make such alterations without obtaining adequate setbacks . hd i AggoQ�v?loo rim ti Adjacent development consists of single family homes and small multi-unit developments to the north, west and south, Which have been developed to existing Oldtown front setback standards of 15 feet.. To the east are older single family homes facing Joliet , t, which are set back approximately, 6 feet from the front property line. The subject proposal would therefore be inconsistent with established front setbacks in the vicinity. Staff ]Report - '8116188 (1087d) Street, De icati n and Corner cut- ! The Department . of Public works requires that the applicant dedicate a 20 foot corner radius at the corner of Joliet Avenue and Delaware Street , to be utilized for sidewalks and parkway improvements . There are currently no sidewalks abutting the site . As shown in the attached diagram, the existing structure encroaches approximately• 50 square feet into this right-of-way area . The Code also requires that ' ne structures over 42 inches tall can project into a triangular corner' cut-off area formed by measuring 25 feet from the intersection of the front and exterior side property lines or their prolongation . This area is intended to provide adequate sight distance from a vehicle stopped at the intersection. The existing structure encroaches approximately 220 square feet into the corner cutoff . The applicant ' s requested improvements would extend the life of the structure such that attainment of public improvements and an adequate corner cut-off would be unreasonably delayed . As an alternative , the Planning Commmission may wish to consider approval. of a modified site plan , which would allow a portion of the existing'. non-conforming structure; to remain . Those portions of the structure that encroach into the corner cutofx and the public right--of-way should be removed . Additionally, the front yard and exterior side yard setbacks should be made to more closely conform with setbacks in the immediate vicinity . It is possible that the building square footage removed in these areas could be located on a second „level , or in the rear of the site if • addi�fonal open space were-provided via a second f loor/roof deck. �¢,,Q_ R=COMIK,�NDATFdN: • Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 with the following findings : FINDINGS FbR DE2 AL : 1 . The proposed structure will not be compatible with adjacent properties because it encroaches within the front yard and exterior side yard setbacks , as Bell as in the public right-of-way at the corner or Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue . 2 . Substantial alteration as proposed will be detrimental to the general welfare of persons working or residing In the vicim, ty because the structure will preclude 'improvements within the public right-of-way, and will impede sight distance at the corner of Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue . 3 . Althouth' the, property is irregular in configuration , tt,e size of the lot satisfies the minimum size of 2, 500 square feet and exceeds the minimum frontage of 30 feet . Therefore, the conditional use permit is not necessary to , preserve a substantial property right . t,. Staff Report 8/16/88 --b- (1087d) 4 . Encroachment into the required setback is not compatible' with setbacks established for properties to the north, south, east and 'west and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon those properties. The Planning Commission may approve Conditional Use termit No . 88-32 .with • :redueed room °size with findings and conditions of approval . ATT CHMENTS 1. Area map 2 . Site plan, floor plans, elevations provided by applicant 3 .•--Previous and proposed floor plans. .4 .._. _.•.Site.,plan with adjacent development, curb radius and corner cutoff 5 . Building Permit dated May 3 , 1988 6 . Building Inspector' notice dated, May 4 , 1988 7 . Stop Work order dated May 5, 1988 a . - Letters from Planning staff dated May 25,' 1988 , and July 12 , 1968 i SH:LP: kla .r f • f 1 z 1 StAff Report - 8/16/88 -7- (2087d) U Y 1 RI as 't • t 1 Mrt_w111LI! ice_ ".�w_1 l.._._. • • as w Rf at st at a �es' ' a,a,. C2 - f�~••i :,.r.�ewrS A, R! • ♦ . 16, let A• w •° {tl no .O �;�' 'O •O O at no IVI .0 � +_ ,+t +I1 ' 1•• — Qi.DT SPECIFiC I ,t.�LCFR -d FLAN RDCi' TWO) { "'•'°o� : r � t Pi CF-R no Sol-w p oll • 1 {t Rt { Z w Somei r��-y r►j �) CI i '• '.•,4.r'M1. (p R� _elrl • 1 . t s �• fit R! N i as M3 43 Cs — s Rt ! _ A ! tt pit oil "' Ri ..� --� ..j Rt { r / Rt j . fitLLTL CF—E i r At V .� ck SPCMK; oil 0 fit t - HUNTINGTON REACH t1ANNllA':: DIvISWq SfAm E - '' . I, , in ODOCOC . _.. %W%b at u t,.�aac -PLOT ?C.w k�r1 wawa, ?Stclt�+ aawrtc�n. of roac4 Mtn: act =L4V. 046boe$t "Ut.M.ay' 1.cwlss�. ab OLD x t+actirt+U" tort A. ux"►ftc,%"m w. Pawl 9 Cam, e^ 1407 . P.• Oil-1`•)•60 Y44�MC�M11 fot: �o�.r!!' A.P•t aua.�41'1«�e • �'�111 �i•t AILH1' + i• Mb0�11r G�14•� W/ �Lw�eL $ UIW VAt.jscwn Z'IL• OyJuV ;..► . W4.4 P11.1p• x 'Ad-&'MM- % +4s WI►,►I 1M.�S�. `� 1.alyQr t'A.p►Asir. s a gem IY MM-4 OVA �c ----------- as d VI L31Dd,'C y svt� CWiiT• ,'� � �� � 1 a VIVO S. G►81►sc`ta CICOC" H • 1N 1 T 1 •,a �1bC♦+1. S ; D1Fi.1/�ZDti•/ �R�`AK . ..�...� .• � 1 T y r , •+ CiL�4tt v.�t � �+ ,' •!r � � A.11p Q 1 J + i • i 1 ti It M�•I♦• 11�•Ql �. y►,an • Z7RY i �l,7ar{►"� 1 IC14t•��tyy � 1�GL�4.11�'►rddi�MWi.. t �i • ' � �v�CJl 4 t,1,+•1� .!�� t+�>rt 11r•O•C.t�iwrj At►`� '� 1. _ �.t�•trt Ipy/ tat I�� 1+e�cw Nb 6,��mil.M A>R q M�1D� Y*I f tG Itt L�f.�!t'h�l to �Md4c.T film"#"K Mieit^"w WCOAAlks •4- 4 ���( � +c,w� G /, i�. _ __ , -rI' '- ,I, -- - ,,}�,""�7,�,} i� —. t'��"'.7�r^••- -N.,.�r s„ ;1PA{t+e+xf.Y..,v.r��.�' I . tir rrw i �vsw E.�u��+a►s. a�tW t2+'+ ,•loll L4 s cw ?Ra�iil�'t` 7 rows fflE out F L 00 PL. N �. PlglN& �M L,WNG41 NC Raw R LAC� �.. t MAC ENT STRLt-f'URic 'o0v aw am ky i¢a •1�rvK ♦•k�L'►,1. .2 ri�i r• ,4.i; w\'Sy�I�,«}ff�1H0 r+(� ' I r+++ ,r���` •�':+CsyK,t ra,ZSi �5�12' 4T'�'}i.'`v.,71I ♦f�LvlLyi+ xt:Y.v\r+r s;,•1 rf t!fri;! Y<,�� ~`�`iSY�,Lt rtltijv►^ �,-k�' '6S tf��{\�' r,4t� <y rvi�� i..�.•�..h.YrL'�afM+�t�/S 1 ` �s.Jf-f/i'-s. v fs�♦l vFf i?.JW; f..w..j a�'."�j.fY.>+h.i� 1 tiff Jy:^v\{hrr♦ + (5' r[ 44. 1Y \ 1 vu f r. { srj �.r s y1I S.• }�, / f y. 419 w kvJ f ;l r ¢.• a4� __it T ♦ ti'r7C`v;.s th' r �r'f } v r S i ar{-♦n s�4� G. +�. rr.srh[�I' !'�.t� , '!f!^n"�M!,i"!�'•'i,�.,lrt ••3 c}+.+t...ay..,..4 \i.r.j,fI!c •h+T+,r•`�cr li S�"3-�' : s q+•w..Vt�..�. w 'r• i '�s �Z S r t Z•f ♦? a x �Y! 'k• ', <.r Y.!-'t;k � 'r. ♦��4^ CN"''\•w >r � s "J f`.hv S.\rY�.,.t ef'��r �a:!1. M+.. �%+� rL.r`♦ �7 � . 7 ♦ F �, its * 4 ♦t♦ S•'y1•� s{ ,,1 ..r. i �~��r-._f s � a•. {+ .y ♦ ♦f t t<.�{Cr-1\ \. s yt+�'rYsr f �SI '1Y"+r���s( r ma`s°s v•y♦i``ts r?�'''11y'+M,f,, t iL�'`i.•\� .\•+st ��f. �i•_� T\1.yt�3c� s�r1 •r(.•Is'h r ^ S%�� 7 t L�„� 1:.♦ t .�•`1 x a x ' {�p� an�'♦v M,♦ !(.,f' !,{. BSI r 1\S� s �) 1r V t k 't '• f 95 y`�(Y� le,,�i,s M .+ �j, Y r s/ �SSQ _}.� s!•.�•I S !'s{n r r ci (�� :,��ijri Jtl'.J �.vl�w +��FlCr TN � T'rs ,,v\ s♦t.;5 \,� ♦'v;!f .�Lw'�l��s ♦i Gf"'L \i,�; ^4! r � sY, �% v1� � 2- t�v,7 L �! e h •t [!t r`f l `.i�y�f tiS,.,'. �+,v�W' Yf1 t\' �lT�r•rl �v�'i`i 2 v�♦sw�}�! t•.,� -.=fj Y r:Qi fJ *, Mss. ry`�`sr?"flr•{4's'n �• i a�Y 7r1✓��Ar\3"'t�y,L r'C y} y +� s M�+tiL..\,� `�� �i.�s^ +Zy v(r• tkl +.i t� ice'.\ a a i_ e 1 ,ss '•5 1 +�+�, �%+r � tiYf`1r '3�+rr ,• 71G)Cr> y1At «y� .\�.�\(:Y s\ tt�.� \ > !t+ v ry<.,'Z?.`Ti'�'{v!� \ r #rev �+'i M+f�_fx•.<Y,`f .4�lYXr�a.Y�`a` � i�w,�+'!C#• r� i^et t>• �v♦,���..� • �y .}n.r \�.SM + Cf�I� � la� M�•wr: 11. i C.�Z} f T\., � �.1 . t'Y S+ T !. t V i ♦ Ma �y� ,'1 O *,' v � '.• s h Y� y w' r..MtS{ ~ C �-Lr\�♦- { � ,tt'L ,tiY. t`^SS {`r W�.� `P Y��j.f �'•�Kv4.1•wb .r•if�-7`,a(> i!' t•.!r �� ♦i}�'-ris >A 1Tw n 1 !+S: t!s A.:r�t b�Vi.�✓ ,y i T�.!•`51)+i/ ,r Y a♦� a♦ .145 2 ♦ \'( r„` s<,. . LA S�S� ta'�'s:1�fY wf, F ft.X'.t Y Fn)1'�i�/r/+S }s��)�^i♦'' s .a aL Sf c� � v ��;•Ts�• ��d SV [vl '9�. t XS > S �r� t*7 ss__♦ .;11 t ,'r 1 5 �+ 1� ?. i��,.���l�f,.�•.+ s �k^1. y�'�2�`t�•'�s�`.7�Y } j1( ll'{�`w\+ � ��ir��rzt�)r,: ` , +r.�{ ~(7.��i+`t'i 7�t`{�4YVf���,�1/y ': �rr[c4�''x� �,.'•'�,`,'�?..'`"c l.. 4r';�?� �e+�: v\�•.�.;r•?,�..f� it 0 SIT bAb'-A ��a� ...•�■.,.■ �■r�r.�r. ■,.r.r.r■ ....�r.�■n� ■■■.n•�n.� ^,vim.*♦� ��t�+ �+k ..ret� • � w .ummr..w+ mrwr 1 cw , " +Dr.w li 1 w �. ■.. •r L UTO FF KLH r ate' RADI u xis i mp JOLIET AVE. PROPEPTY LINE l..tN� nEDt��T10 , I lit+f. ►-►.1-U. udiaAA 14a Ua• ..a as Owner Contractor- "All tiltl (!0 CURTt•':TOk) CL113 CA • .Ito.. Architect or Eastasar •� , •r':•�• �,-`' ' ,�' � _ 1 , ' •''•ter Cr � ----------------------—~---r----------r--r---r-------••-----r-r--rA—�—....•ram—�N—. Camomestat'JIMAME MOT 011 A iOOf BEhGVr 2 NOW-IFS I IG WiUS.-AiO '1 j `� . .;i: : :�••.. ALL FOR aE0110-MOVE 1 DOC&, OEK4 3MAGE 1, IONCH _• ''f•:• t•� luhll9 oulllttos T No 34.Ft l Lt+tes Me.3torl ae 1 Yalustlon 2000S ,._ '1 ;�s, Carola co.ra■tltaa '1 Dut1d.L0de a, M - � DeAartOtl '`' • i '00c Grpt 13 Conatr.Typ. TO Ooc.Load .?��' genre UT31D1 f Csaeua Cwd• 434 etds.ueale 3YD tarltla• 308.' •S. ~ ; I.saalat Action$ Coastal Porsttt . ba --------------------------------------------To,.--r.-----------------«�- Apvl.o.to 05/Z31511 Landuee XM 05/01/116 Auth. CH o5r01/8's _ - - -•---------------------------------•----------- '--------------••-------•-•• \ rC tG 3o9o1pt ♦ ----------------------------------- - rlfz.uad- ChC 05/03198 Ieeu9 190911;!, ♦ 23102 ".-1���• ---------------- ----------------------------------------.-----------.rr---�• 1sarECT;o1r FEI3• . . .. ,>�' i . 1$•a.r1ptlen Ahount .Do nor ipttoo f•ouwt':;= �`�;i�' S ----------- laaaaotioa rive 14p.60 �•,t .-!. ;� rroeaaals4 10.00 /llRcboalc 109.54 ` �:•� •'�' Library 0,00 Coaa4:.vatlelk , �• �I .. More Copt raa 7.00 • - `-1 raaalty 0.00 Total Fos 296.59 • � ���: it . `�•, Tit „eLL { �. } oweweutoiwotwawtsisst �. � e} .-•ot•t w+ias�a.ateur+}.Sa 1 AA.r.ar I tS-..a-.r S•(-.•+.A\r.0 u.v w\r.ti rw•1 i.,.. i tU. titnl a.r.r r N.wr-.6+. ti--b.- ■-.M .r•..r...-�< - •+......-.-ti\...♦...��..r.rr-.r r... •«++.w r sa-•.-. t--9 to r....a.. _.�R ..�'_-.rr�".-;•�.•.}Taro---+,.a++:,f�' tr-...•r\-..��r•.-..�+.+.o.r1�M�\.gyp wa~-NW~"wry _.r.. 40 ...--O. •wht•- �+-►r_......... I-.-'may-"Guar Ions w afr.o m i s-a-.-,..r rawm d..tf.r 006" rr.►1--,w'•w.rf-.-rrr ra MMr •�,r.f tr•.f►.I.r~air ar i.d.t Aft.*)saw Utz-....rto 6-m..sft r 061MK/h O1.Y../.I,/MY.fiMi" I.-�...�r,.fir fY;iw..•Ii.i lr-\t l-rtN..`.�r 1.�Y!�-. Oft. -.r�•.+t�'9w--.---I:w-e-�.N,r0}/f/_�.L.!r./-1.4••.a It f7e.•�..rr r`w -,-..r!�,...-7 �.w IwY M.Hasl.a•-1 v_- -'•a--•l.f a•vw mm a•w.M,M s•--I r-..+.�lw..1i 1 r.y ... w r••.-.-...-.rw�.-....---.r..r�1...s --.-a.u-.r r--..5 .0-+--.Ma r rr,-r.•M 7•M. �•-. --..W-v r-.r a+r r.+.a..a.-w Star►fr►-•tr--.�.\-� 4...-.f M,- r•�^. ...•1.;;�•'�: •`,-c4- .•r�:> s•.. _. *AW-A Oa-r-rwA-�.-.a-*"»we%" ft 10-4am-ft.% m=ry'.. 1 .."do.•0 rwcr+.t ..---,.r ti.."SM.- IN v.M.f w ON.*t-w ".r,r-fv. f••y ---..w..r-.-•..r • Stw w.earn 4..•.r-.-.-.-.---.•r wr r--.w ft.w ' w. ... q" P to w+d%rw�'.0 r.►►'-,...+�..rr.-r,... ,.. J 49 1 a.ry w.:a I...-.......:v.r-..0 a... "W-moo.r 6.0- •r+.. Its"r 0%~0 of A.a.....rt t.r....s..a r.�a.r...v tw w a"• our.ra..t-tt.twtl tttt~:, �'-+ 1\--.-rr..n.-..►-.--+..•+.r..1•.--ter of p_.,tw* f.....arm.-..'.....�..--.�...Ntir . •wrtnt-r�at-t1�+fN.bCl - .:A.`(/'- •\ •Q t..r.r.s,w�.a.+.••�••++S•IS..r-.w rru.frf.�•...H t-r.r�M..r r.-+.- w-.ewe w ►-+-.+*--•► 1a.+i. Itt tr..r Sr f rat.Sr 1 tr..t tr.�i....r Sam S..t.-•-.-D..a a-..*t w.r.+.sa+.►'-V, - .'- - _ - • ----�'amb~.V......r r--- �.............�..-.��.*fir �4 • •Ili► . few w+9rtcrovr:rr.U'ECTOMJkl)&CWV Cot,Iffy.Jaa COW-OFfW=!CWeCNGOPY-Arpuiilf IV too - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH OEFARTM:NT OF _ T 0MLOPM"OT SERVICES INSPEL ON REPORT f`_X COR R EC740N UOTICE 5fEuilding O Electrical O Plumbing ti .. PERMIT NO. r, •..:•�, _.ate-__ -• • JOB ADDRUS Ile 1 if more ors Questions an the above Please•ull me al ltween and...-.....r...,...•_.,...•• 1 t� " �It• :l ggr rl • r --.�_ .... „ ... ....••a rya. M ' __ ....�,a .. Ry•- _... • -••.1 1 1 r•.•. r - •� _• • r.� `�,• _ -:' �-��--; INYESTIdATION Rqp*%ORT OF BUILDING' HU"NGTON; CAUFORNIA Joh Addresa• rrp t,�U L Lc,.'E"'• ' . . Lot tio. Tract No. 81ka No. f OWnees •• . - V ' Address Descrlption •. ;... ' of Work XNA Y\A I •� Cn • � 1af1r i • ` K•••—•• r w a A • Approx. Size , Approx. Valuation PERMITS REQUIRED •- `• 8uiiding Electrical 0 Plumbing G INSTRUCT10NS It (will) ) be necessary to STOP W 0 H K immediately ar,1 to obtain tho necessary permits, tl Pro.6do two copies of (1) Plot Plan, (2) Floor Plan, s (3) 151ruetural details, (4) Elevations, (5) Other infor• mation as required. ��. Spe-tfal Instructions � .�..._.. • tot yr rf I certify that one copy (ryas) (vas not) left at the i . .. r above addFess . . . -.•. ::; • • inskZ _ Signature r flats ' Q .&r._ Rwtinq: NR t 1n"iar •.f/w.:QtOtu CapYM - Fir►'3Crin+K t7 �` •• . J rr Via' • �w� 'i1 irw�. •..r �. ••' ,• 71 • �•Swr•,• •. •r. r r r w it. •.•�.. .•i w..•..r4 w w •••.�.r.wrr�.w a••.w4 M - r• � ri v. I . ., _:::, .�-.,c.-,.*•. { t aware.. ... r ... �.. r...,.... ..,... ...�...�—..-..��.—.---- „' ' �t o �- u tingtOn each «7 M 20MMAINSTREE7 -�• CALIFORNIA92648 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . .. _. Building Division 536.5241 Nousi"Madevelopment Divi:iots 53&554� Planning Divieior. 536.5271 May 25, 1988 ' Mark O'Donnell 220 Maid Street Huntingtcn Beach, CA 92648 �~ SUBJECT: 503 JOLIET, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA Dear Mark. The site plat for 503 Joliet has been reviawed by staff for zoning compliance, and based on Section 9652(c) of the Huntingmn Beach Ordinance Code, it has been determined that a conditional use permit and conditional exception applications are required for this project. In addition, a chain of title Is necessary to determine the date of creation for the existing lot. I recommend that the chain of the title be submitted firs: so that we may determine if the lot was legally c-eared. I have enclosed copies of the application for yo-.:r convenience. If you should have any questions regarding .his matter, please call me at 536-5271. Sincerely, Mike Strange Senior Planner MS:gbm Ja . -� Jd - City of H U- n8nsf ton Rea' ch y• .:_ _; 2000 MAIN STREET cALIFOR.` 1A 92t'Id8 = ' t . . DEPARTMENT nF COMMUNITY D EVE LOPMENY Buildlnq Uivition S36•S241 `Housing/Red2volopment Division 536•SS42 Plenninq Division 536•S271 i July 12, 1988 Mark F. O'Donnell .- Pierside Business Services =-r Post Office Box 329 Huntington Beach, CA 52648 SUBJECT: 503 JOLIET STREET :gear Mr. O'Donnell: '7 This:letter is in response to your correspondence dated June 28, 1998 and your numer= telephone inquiries concerning 503 Joliet Street. As stated in past meetings and { conversations, in order to proceed on your project you must file for a Conditional Use Per*init. The necessity of this application is due to the extensiveness if rehahilitation work being conducted on a non-conforming structure. Your building presently encroaches r into the front yard setback area and therefore will also require a Conditional Exception. Upon submittal of the necessary applications (Conditional Use Permit do Conditional Exception) a staff member will be assigned as the project planner for your project. if In filing your application you should have questions that cannot be answered by the planner working at the counter at that time, a meeting should be scheduled with the Counter Supervisor, Susan Pierce. Questions that cannot be answered by the Counter Supervisor will be directed to Scott Hess or myself. Staff recommendation on your project will not be rendered until such time as the City has adequate access to all facts related to the project. Once staff has researched the project, a staff report will be submitted to the Planning Commission for public hearing. Typically, there is a 4-6 week time period from the date of filing to the public hearing. We hope this letter has thoroughly addressed the process which must be foilowed in order to complete your project. Should~you have further questions regarding thi!Matter, please do not hesitate to contact F Susan Pierce of my staff at (714) 536-5271. •. Sincerely, Mike'jk rcs, Planning Director cc: Susan Pierce, Associate Planner Mike Strange,, Land Use Technician MAa•t C' +i of yHuntington beach !•�.: ZM MAIN STREET 1 CALIFORN1A9MS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 536.5241 HoUAWROdevelopment Division 5.1&5542 Planning Division 536• 271 ' w May 25, I988 ' Mark O'Donnell 220 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: S03 JOLIET, HUNTINGTON BLEACH, CA Dear Mark: The site plan for 503 Joliet has been reviewed by staff for zoning compliance. and based on Section 96521c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, It has been determined that a - conditional use.permit and conditional exception applications are required for this project. In addition, a chain of title Is necessary to determine the date of creation for the existing lot. I recommend that the chain of the title be submitted first so that we may determine If the lot was legally created. I have enclosed copies of the application for your convenience. If you should have any ques: ons regarding this matter, please call me at 536--5271. Sincerely, Mike Strange Senior Planner MS:gbm , (OS62d-•3) Huntington Beach Planning Commission n P.O. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA mu D%Nta: iu�:st 18 . 4Eq : NOTICE OF ACTION ._ Applicant: Mark F . O ' Donnell Subject: CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT NO . 8g-31 Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach Planning Commission on August 16 , 1986 and your request was : I ' • Withdrawn :• j Approved Approved with Conditiona (See Attached) Disapproved XX (See Attached) Tabled Continued until j Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code . the actic, l taken by the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal is filed tc' I the City Council by you or an interested party . Said appeal must be : writing and must set forth in detail the actions and grounda by and upon which the applicant or interested party deems himself aggrieved . Said appeal must be accompanied by a filing fee of one hundred and sixty-five ($165 ) dollars and be submitted to the City Clerk ' s office within ten ( 10) days of the date of the Coz=iss ion ' s action . In your case , the last day for filing an appeal and paying the filing,-: fee is Aususc 26 , 1068 . •ryy Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such that any application becomes null and void one (1 ) year after final approval, unless actual construction has started. w C PC-LT- 1A ;r moo m t t CH AfA �.. 1Ai` A OrTEiE1i NON-CONFORNQl1G ' ' PROMMIFS IN `iM, aam SUR11OU14DING NEIG�HBOR1100D m • 503 JOLIET :` (SUB EM PROPER'M ' L - 1) 1001 FLORIDA �`''` MAM� R 2) 1005 FLORIDA XXWOMA ' 3) 620 JOLIET � ► 11) 611 JOLIET :•:t�,c.f 1 f�..._E z ,� 5) 902 noRIDA 4lots ' 6) 901 E24GLAIID cz a 7) 507 �toLier ��sE •gyp' i f _ a 8) 505 JOLIEI' �- 9) 111 DM WARE I f 10) 1108 LIN OLN L I N CO � 11) L102 CALIFORMIA p1 12) 302 JOLIE-r . 13) 1005 HUN'TIt roN irk t t 4, 1007 HUNTTI>G-TOtI Y C(C _ t 15) 308 JOLIET .• " "4 17) 711 Ii WINGTON 'J®L 18) 619 NUNTINTMN 19)r 1111 INDIANAPOLLS ~? - 20) :901 DELANAftl: i Not r Pao I��•� 21 ) 611 INDIMIAP01.13 22) 628 HARTFORD � 23) 623 GEMA 1� 211) 3 I LL HaiR FARI) , n[IS DOES NOT INCLUDE f .�` PROPERTIES MIAT ARE •" '��� ,� NON-CONF 1004C UNDER �� G EIJ NEV DENSM GUIDELINES. :3 ec SHC CHIC 0 8aLT1 E T9x w r t CITY OF UNTING� TON E A •. f! DlPAIRTMINT OF Y t DEVELOPTAENT SERVICts INSPEMON REPORT CORRECTION NOTICE j Building 0 Electrical 0 Plumbing ♦ ti• ••+ � � r,,,. ,r,�. ter, r,w__ ..••• rr•.• :-.... Y • • y ! Ty "t' .� ' .�,y.� ��..Z i� �.7Vr•.�•Y�'1 r • �.J �+• • •. �X „/� M S• �.•rC• ri�j �'• ►• y�,, to,;.•.,• �, /r • ', .lr; r • •!l;� .a�,.. i:••. •`, �•.�1•K++�11'"♦rr f`l•►. �,•r•`'r•.••h' ''r ice^ ♦Y �•s ~► ♦.1.:�Z�,.•+,����j"I 'T.: + f�.. .` •� ..r.�Mw^n/-w,L•r•1.1u••'tlwi.��.•'.+.• •a •i''t".1Jr••r�C'r♦.�rr.r..ww� Lr t., r , � ' � j•1Ir•r'v f���.,r�\V •i ✓I.l .. y.. IJ1r . ``�S•.••.�. ••1.' 'j •r . .. �i:T` M fa •. ♦ � • r+1� 1._.�• •�.�.r.rti'+•1�.4�'1�JI~ i w��' •. .• , '}V•7 {�V':I�`;�rjlf'�;r:rT!��rt•`•'I�;r���F'�!I,art•w �:�•��.2:•'.j,:•.�7:p:.�.r�:i►'•r.�'�%^C. r � I t I � t �l C102 9 VI }� r . rr..r'(:••��• ' ••r V.T`.ro����•%�.'•f t.'rf'�1►ifsarS ir+r j:•...*•fir i'�.,,T,���•`•••�,t I • � �• � Jl',,l"l ��• rd�l�f 7•.'�i•'-Ft�•♦ �, r'-, \ !.. •41•r4•} • .:• rl • • � . � �.�'. Yr�,T .: ti. •,.tr••.a_.••Z''1•�•=.�,`,•'r't•� r..7 r, • �••�1�•7•.,.. { f• r .1=.i mow. �� �. � • . ; ` � ' . f.. r' .M•'� !. ►•• r •. �.I 7»! •.�I��r"��i • �y+�s'y i` ,_f�l •._ 4 �.•` ,• �r•�«,• •t�i..i .•. • y�•a ^++� - e �• '� fi -'ti.v•M�sv�►IE�% + �'r � �•Tr .1 �'. • !. •• .. . .ice . � err•♦,..r�, f�,•r,• tr• I ,' , • r , • i w Wt �! ar l f•�.Q 1 iS.� T .q �_t %.► •�•...� :.:ti.�;nt.�t " +.Z.•L,,...., I •'. t•.r•5.., •.'• t • �MAO :�ii;•1�«�I• C`o��iliLi� � ;� ti, f ''T• �.r�; 1.�„ •. ~ ~rC:.'.�/ r;.1: �.i r;a• �."••^i ,•.. f,��L• ..y•f.•2 w; .�•f t'rR S .r• �. i'J rf'a}:Aii.fi..i'-.i r JvC.`;.•mot�� f'�,�-•f'••;•..'• •Y '"1�•r•L "�► • • �.:+.' IA f t '••t;}.� 4 ,'••+• • �. .• �. � . ~ �. .�.L« ^S+7I••T r• •, i •. :'l a. rr:•• w••�•.:.. ��•• ! S.• 2 •• .'�• `• � • I��•'Mtu�J.�� •x.� O r.i•`51.1 j'y�•1t"��i�ii'��.•JKL��., ..'.i�ir7 M• • ��1�p� �►M, • �_y���xj�fi,!•r�`,l.••. �;�. '��r�•1{J••�+• � f �w•• ti 1i 1�V � F "•Y 1,�'^���r.'•r't �����'•;f• •�'Qrj1(� �'l•/'ij!•�r •�i��.ftZ 3�`•'ti•'�.:�✓ '• .' r .. � t r,"r »•r, `» •7. .4^M• � ��.. -. � .�•+!:'/'r►1r.2'wa rlt I �' �•y.�,�w'r• .•••'+ ... rr •�� ••� I ;.r:.w►1 t.• r!' J ' •. • t•'�,. y-.'•Y . t•��Y�p,t�'�"• •T •. r r. `•� v.. ':.�•ti ,�'�!M. •�i �' •`y.`I ♦ . .., .,��'• y��. ••..•• t• ♦ - �fi!'ty II •'l.4.`•f••' �. `.y ., r '. - •+ ,•.`- I •_'1•••'♦ ,r••'t � � , • ' `.' _•. 'tom ',y J. • ♦ •;1 •.. .A!•'�::N�..f•.: til ';r • A qt. ,� •. �•�• w.• / t ,l. . '� V'►w,I'',!� •� ..•••.♦ ��I ♦'• •i.w••... ••.S= r 1• • ►• �•' �' ••♦ r r ♦ •r f,_f., ♦ � �'f •♦' vrl..., �� +♦. r - ., t'.!•^/•p• .f� •7r:` 4' . .lam.♦...' •,. •♦•'' •* . .i t• ••i ..... ••�• � ••i - r ,!r ... ,t �•♦. •.:..'' ,""'•• a:.• `rf�,n• ` • r _ / r,•, 'f�w., • �• .If♦ .•i •1 ,••,•..••♦r` �..;:r••• i� +' r��I� •�C•••r • ~•, f�w� ♦ ♦ ►f. ,r•. r �•♦f j Li �I r'I'••{•J I• •••• t � � � •-,"�. f•„• ... �•'r .•.�. • • ..•::I . .,1•.frr:� •I! .•,;;..y�,.{,• •••• •,• •..� r7.. •,•, , .•.. -r.: :yr �• • •• n•,• r+• •.. '.r= • •• ,'� f,. •_1. • _ �•• •S�•r•1• �,•�:•• . r.•,+ ./ ', +. i.•.i .•.'7!- .rr .''•`�' L�•''• •.�•1. • • t•r.•.• �1 .. �Sr '�.�••L•r� •:,•.. ♦ �. • ��\, f .. . ••' '•!�. 'A •' •r•.�/ 'a • •' ..• . f,, 1• . .. ,'.'••••t •'d'r;/1:'� •.�•.� J::t+ .•,•.�. ♦r•'.► • ,• ♦ •j�� ,�:•i�-•�''r .• ., K ,.•, n .. ,. ••1. r;,V , •ri. I rr - .1 ,�,L♦�tr�i�yr,`41.�• r���rL�• ••V• •�r..Aj=•r�*/.y��jt�iv'i•.�vr 1!� r•►-�'I � ♦ � •Y i• .•r1 •r•'r�1• �r•yM1"'�� �� •�. .''r:�����' "- }'y f ` :�I►.�p --►�'~�A,,, 5�`i-. • INVESTIGATION �AEF0 7 `r _ •t•••r'�/,•,.=.i,;f••�Y,' • w•.2••.-"'.-1•.'•!..•^�,•. - r'!..! ���w��:�_;.,;r� DEPARTMENT ♦i MJ,,�'�1��?♦r• •• �.f CITY VT '♦• +� 1 OF .BUILDING ,�- ,t,;, HUNTINGTON BEACH•'` :w.• •• •� -•�•�•` �•�Zr '%1��a !►`'r r' v,' /♦ ► •' ,�, ••• ' ' ••(�t �j•_s.r.R. - •.t/j c,;.y .:`.. .♦...,� 1 •,,• r "• `- �l.r - ••'. '` +•.' i .. .. .-. . . �'..Ca:a LIFORNIA r:;t�.., CA ,. ;t•Job Address. 50 UtA: . • Lot Na, Tract No. BIk. Nn, wner Owner's _ ,•. •: , ' ' -rAddress �=�. ` .:_:s_ ,:--w°'.�:.��^{ T�•it�•:r�r '..-_,, "• '�' ;' . .-` ,.ram..,...- .. Description t t . of WorA .•,• Cr .' �y •Z••'•�./y�• �~v�•�!}�I t.';'J• •t M•b Zr•K{�„"�yf'~I •�....�.�.�`•�•„ 1 1� J• •Ir� w• �'^" :.l µ�:�jl�• �tti« 17' i..J r'1 �: 7 �+r.•. �.r ���',�' 1'•�, •••��•• • .....�s�n ••'r,Of :+ • -.r�. Approx. Site ~� -••�;_��,: 'z i Approx. Valuation ' , r r1r1 f"'yr'"��• 'l.'jLtX w•.i%ri/.>t,►.•... - �.•,+�r` r l.�•• rf.•y ,t-'�••-, •. i PERMITS REQUIRED � P,uilding G Electrical a Plumbing [] - INSTRUCTIONS it (will) (.eiiowt) be necessary to STOP WORK • _ Immed iately toY rr d to cbtai n the necessary Permits. is. Provide two copies of (1) Flat Plan, (2) Floor Plan, (3) Structural details, (4) Elevations, (5) Other Infor• mation as required. Special Instructions P tilU.�1Q1r `kAnXI U. N CA-PI •t • r' -•,. �•�f i• i1 `►�• _'�:�r7•"'!..J C�4r ►�'•KL�!LJf ,.I i.,:.►J• r I certify that one copy (was) (was nct) IQ;'t st the • l • . above address --,vci;::r=- •X-1 Z. . •.. • . :,I n$pect0e�Slgnsturao �h/'►� '.Iz ��fib' a, •Date___=--=-'--.._ �I Routing:Ns.1 Inspotisr - No.2 0"Ice copr '! No-3 0m1 r'�"~"' w �. :._7M.. r/~•y•►.;,. -•ti. j r•~A/n\r••••4,•♦•ram •..••yrw1+ •�•+y y f r•' PAPA CRTZ 10 •..� � / � .• . • �••. •a\,.••V` • •�. �••\2w, 'i,r••'r ••r/•/••.•+/w•i 1•�.•b t� ��A,••�•.�'r it'/"•' •r♦r7►��f,�j,.-•♦* ♦. City Of Huntington Beach 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92M DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Building Division 636-5241 ' Housing/Redevelopment Division Planning Division 536.5271 May 25, 1988 Mark O'Donnell 220 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: 503 JOLIET, HUNTRI TON BEACH, CA Dear Mark: The site plan for 503 Joliet has been reviewed by staff for zoning compliance, and based on Section 9652)(c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, it has been determined that a conditional use permit and conditional exception applications are required for this project. In addition, a chain of title is necessary to determine the date of creation for the existing lot. I recommend that the chain of %he title be submitted first so that we may determine if the lot was legally created. i I have enclosed copies of the application for your convenience. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 536-52711. Sincerely, Mike Strange Senior Planner MS:gbm *� n Qua urUUjj b l so RW tw 121 n -4Ri - �__„_., Plaming Coeeeission igneril lla� Zoning Acisinistrator ..,.,_., Staff Ravi r+ j nn jd . Precise Plan Desisn Review ,�ark F. 01Donnell pPlin Alyiew _ Applic L or Autharised Agent Sits Pl&n Are •- Mai ing Address Silo Elan Hiryite SPR Hunt Beach C�a�992.648 _ city trts Zip � 0 Telephone Humor z2ne chtnat ..a FAA Zone Property a Envirorumntal Flood Zone i+- Exsept NO Oil District 2407 3cod co- Arad o EIR Wevelopment Area Mailing Address 0: Alquist Priolo Area Cep' Ca 95307 c'- Coastal Ara&: Yor No DATE RECEIVED City State Zip 1 209) 537-7885 .__Ex�+p c COP Telephone 8mber Categorical Exclusion Ste_ A=ACEEn ADDENDUM, _Ownership Verification Applicant Authorization Plans. APs, Juttificatior. Receipt / Concurrent rases: rev ous Uses: i Pursuant to: In tiau of: J,( jiOH A.HO DEESCAIPTIOH OF EMERTX: a Street address:, S03 Jabot St-met. IhmU nUm Be anh Ca Q RAS o Nam and distance to nearest intersecting strost: _0ej2WZrn $tmei to the„Weat, 12+ o Assestor's Parcel Mucber _025=167-10 „_ Acre►pa_ 51.0M�tt+ .0e • or 2970 9.q. o TractVi3ta dad. r Block 3M5 tot t„al IS and M o Section Tomship_____r, Rang• have read and understood all Please Print Your Kamm statewents including tht filing requiromnts on the reverse side of this applScation. I 1 so th• propartr owner of the subject` property. l hereby affirm under penalty of per ury that the foregoinq 'statesa►nts, he facts and attacwits are true and correct. I understand that this appl cation for entitlement or variance way be .denied, wdifiod or appmv d with conditions and that such zmodltiont or, modifIcations must be wplied with prior to issuance of building peneits. t hereby authorize , .,�� C , to act ar my representative erN to bind I* in all matters concern ng this 51 . of ...,,,,,,,,.........,.._... mature re;rrty =er 7 lokt; Autherl t Date .. Hwic F. 0'har�y .L.. ADDENDUM TO CONDITIONAL USE PERM T ' The project is the remodeling of a single family home on the northeast corner of Ealaware and Joliet Street . No expansion of the existing residence is taking place. Instead , many safety and aesthetic improvements are taking place . The outside paneling has been removed in order to reframe the residence and install drywall . The roof , which was subject to leaking, is being replaced . Electrical and plumbing is being improved for safety. An encroachment (porch) on the portion of the property possessed by the City on the Delaware side has been removed , as wt'l as a fixture (shed) that was an eyesore adjacent to the proper•.-y line away from Joliet Street . Removing the unsightly front and side parts , cleaning up single wall construction with new framing, cleaning tip the roof framing, rewiring with a new service panel , replumbing the kitch- en, baths , and laundry room, replacing windows with aluminum sliders , insulating with R-11 in walls and R-19 in ceiling, , drywall with 1/2 sheetrock , rercofing with composition shingles and wrapping and stuccoing the exterior has improved both the safety and aesthetics of the residence, wit)--out increasing the size of the existing struct-:re . The changes comply with 59552 (b) and (c) . One major problem which is hoped will help accelerate the granting of Conditional Use Permit is that a building permit was issued to applicant and construction and removal commenced. Shortly thereaftert a stop work order was issued . The result is since May, 1988 , an open unprotected building exists , which building is subject to vardalism and vagrants using the residence for shelter . The stop work order has resulted in a potential dangerous and ugly condition at this time. GLR36/080 7/14/88 M Narrative re Use: of Property ( # 11) (a) The site reasons for initiating this application are that tk.e City of Huntington Beach , after iesuiug a building per- mit r f iled a stop notice and requested a Conditional Use permit � Application be filed to reflect the nature and extent of improve- ments. (b) The project is a single family home located at the corner of Delaware and Joliet Street, in an area of single family homes and some apartments. The population served All be one family. The entire neighborhood will benefit by a more desirable appearing building, with safer fixtures and wiring within the residence. (c) Remodeling of a single family home . The outside dimensions are not being increased , but rather are decreased by 127 sq. feet . The only room added is a bathroom. (d) The Surrounding uses are residential . l , ; aLR36/082 Ric Lucte'Li.a t It1a. shatL tvC.vna,t 5 KumaEe 1605: Cata.Uita Ave 420 .scu.et Ave 911 Vetcuot,'td S.t SEa Beach, Ca. 90740 Huntuta tort Beach, CA. 9268,E Hu►Ltina.toiz Sea;it, CA. 076 025- 103-01 OZ5-1C4-Os 02s-104-14 t Lty, F.utnh 8.t,ilttt Shiateu FenauSon 4cha%d Ke.Ztet 10 19- Vetmurtd St. y09 ve-imzLtd St 1556b Gialtam •N,:sttit:)tgxon Beach, CA. 92648 HU►zt6tato)t Beach, CA. 9Z648 Huntuta.tolt 8eaeh, Ca. 976� 02 -103-02 025-104-04 025-153-10 F Low',s SatCabaugh KCV.CIt J Kc,t,Cek David 7' Femie t 16156 Twt to& C.i,+ 905 Denutmtd S't 6 731 Hat ban Key 'C -t Hu)ttr<.)taton Beach, Ca. 9264Y Hurt crta.ten beach, Ca. 92648 Hu►tVito.snn SeAch, Ca, 91416 02�-103-03 015- 10,-?5 02S- lbs""-1" L'omm .11 Lcbcw Seruu,e Lc"Se. SO-IMI 1'•'a.'. t� ^iC: Hauen 2�'u51 BeQumv►vt Gc,: Stackbw—w Ra - 321 F 23.d S.t Hwttrutaton Brach, Ca. 92646 Se,CU%k Nu I Z158 Co s.trz Mesa, Ca, 91626 025- 103-05 025- 1041-07 025-1c3-13 Ca-2 A. Ku.tti,,t I-tztu Ff Stela;..-'t Rc,)ta�d� A -k - 470 K,,ezviZte Ave. 3134 N Isabek 1001 cnozaml S.0 '•iLt'ltC.'ta•toll Beach, Ca 92648 Rc4ernea:, CA. 91.77.0 HC:►t.LCl gQ c)t Seaclt, CA. 9Z54L 0Z5 05-06 0l • lOY-Oa OcS-?53 •ld E-*-,- ..d J Pt ps Atsons c P a'-'d cts J" U a-ulC t P Mc Max-ttr 1 =� a.tct)te St Ge► e; &iC.�✓ t ve." i 101 Z c,laCa►ld Sz - Gw:uesI G-, v2 Ca. 926-0 SuF:aeti 0e[C.i• C::. �0"�� jj -r�N y '' {�� A: i Jt5-103-07 025- 104- 10 041:7 63-19 Ciia.L'd j StyZ,Z1 c;,t G e cC H. 1'1 ohC�� .1C.,nS 1 i11'c:!1L7QIt 13 i" lonttE'.eir AVe 906 Ca-Li rt1 ++ 1010 c►tataltd Ave t 9-42 S j+�,i.�•` •; .. -.��• •'1!. �./ C•1. a •'L ,J ��+ •t-r.1ia7 ll,+t Sectc�t, C•',. �i L64. 0 5- 103-09 175- t c?� ♦s.//c.r +ta .rce. Shp,=' a v .0 A '% 6,Y)n J04' wit S Stcch. 1002-CQ&--'Q'j%. ►t S-6 r i 52 6 1-�l�Vr:Z/1' - Ave�• 53 7 3 C HolICIA C,,ci Lit �•�i�t.t. tt�t��)t Ecac 2, CA. 9216 s L.t•./l i'..,. J C'-,.� �•+►�+jC4�"•. C4. qz" 0 / I 02 - 103- 1.s 025-164- 1'6 S C G•toty Paul P !.eU StiePfle)t P Sa,,ve 1001 Detmtw.-d St 12422 Pine St 920 t.110cana .St f�flatitg.tcJt Beach, C.A. 9?W Gotden G,cve, Ca. 92340 MujLr,4jtdaC+t Eeach, ca. VU4 3 j�- IC:-1Y 025-10s- 16 D�'S•16s-17 Ganda. A Wood Hats De fc►.a John 6 Eat t 1005 Der'me .e S.t 910 Car✓{ at►t{a S1 913 Enotand S.t 4wi t.rta-tcn tfeach, Ca. 92648 Hun um-co t leach, CA.. 92648 HUILCi natcrt FeaC:c, Ca. 926= 1Zr- 103. 13 dZ3-lOs-1 ; a24-I�b•13 t F tor null Cha.ttez P Saute AnVivn►r C He,-tnandeC r _ut.e 168 A,,ba Ct 912 Ca.t'i c-%►zut St 3655 C6pct'ze Ave Pecs. Ca. 9Z708 NuAtt►toton Beach. CA, d s,8 wituom J Comm%.t Nocaci fC StcacP�:a�� ;. ,017 :Eltatmid 54- " 1010 ueC=twzd St 904 DeCa=%d Sit ` ; 'AiMt,619.tCn •8each, Ca. Y26.;3 Hwt-ting.ton Beach, CA. 9264is Hcuttutgtton Beach, Ca.i 926:, -16�-03 025-167-16 oCc-632 A ldeopettx Rudy U Ma►win ' 005 .1F4taiiii St .1012 vetmu.rd SIC r i �untbigbit Beach, ; CA. 92648 Hun.�.:ngtion Beach, Ca. 92648 725= 16y-0� 025-168-01 -la r:ne L C%ook -oy=Zd T Woo.L-'�cn 3:0 S Canoga S1 1 S J 12 Memteea Ci t tah•i.e�n,- Ca. 92804 Hutting-ton Beach, Ca. 92647 )25-167-07 025- 16a-C1 'ttr.: es N Unae•t Geoue W CtccU 5.4842 Spi-iitahuzsz Ave :8WReaat Rd Suite a 4u)z.Ujtgton Seacit, Ca. 92646 PZaito 0 7'z 75705 i. )25-167-08 025- 168-03 :elillet"t ptaltt evet y.-I MC sett 07 Jetie it Ave 7Z5 w ut1+.'e S-t :uiMoigton Hea.ch, CA. 920548 Ft ccubu, Co. 80521 J2.7- 167-09 02 r-168-04 aw E Ketw, RcbwLt Lee Vvcc;:S Ol Setv.ice. Rd 905 Eltairastd ZS, Ca. 95, 07 Hun Ziul-tcit Beach, C 91- ,25-;67- 10 025- 168-05 m-,-f c�'eEcnt Kz:,t Kett"t a Szxa- ` 07 Sc%v.'cc Ra; 9618 Kobt,t 've -c es' C►:. 95307 FOUIL '.61 Vixd'er, U. 9':7 C3 '255-767- 17 025- 168-06 i ece M Salldvil stuce J s:U 017. EmZana Sti Ape`. C 918 S�i w .ur=tiistotiOlt Seac%t. Ca. 92is5 Httittmzatoti v' =:r, CA.. -5 '25- 167-12 025- 168-07 as D,'Sandet : NztaUe. A Kctisch 015 #A► Enafand St 2) 8 7tJt J4: Umt,<.ttgtoit Seczdt, _CA* 92643 Hunz ng-,C)l sea cil, Ca. 9:643 7-W-13 025-161-08 ►ut et? C GU-Ciso .i' 1 'J Dezakm%d St 250 Seacieu trt Se �,ti,rto Cnd4lte ut.tc► q.ton Beach, Ca. 92644 Coacita,: Ca. 4)72 0 a- 167- 14 , 025-)6,8-09 :tst%r. C Gi.Etr. RicJtsz,d C 7v4 tn� 92658 . ,S�er b tina Ave .90740 td S t D 1 S 13e3at�a. Y /t 3earlt a i A. _ _`.� `„'. _1 t 1 M. 40 c 1 rare; AN _ r-- t r -�WO t --40 r. r � - e • e ' r , Y M A r 1 .. r �• d�a w 1 3 J I� 1, - _ s R • l I. 4L - y - .r..u.s 1 �ry 4 � ppjj J� zk Lj 1 99 1111 DELAWARE � i �I i r � S-10 408 LINC" { .X i II O t 1 1102 CAI. MIMIA ri .I e $12 302 JOLM ,a i • .L I r� I 16 � • � , jig . ` ,�. .�� �1�� �. IN! 1rr i A 13 1005 HUNTI13TON fell M 1007 _.W1111G1 AI a r r it I K� I it I I #15 308 jom.F.r Ilk r .11GJw•� e 16 807 f sulrr1 tmori 4 r ��+�' ` w L�• w ' ,.' AP � J� IV rpm r � r \ X.. owift * �� � �h.�. Ott' - '� �i��A� �•�R�' a • S i I , i I 019 Jill INDIANAPOUS v it .,v-?n� �,'•� � :L:! 'J% - I I 020 90I DIUWARE T I I i I I I I I� II i #21 611 IVDIANAPOLLS rt I I i i 022 628 fMMU) I 023 623 CENEVA plc;.'• I w I 0211 3 BILL .j Vy♦7t` �• f ram. 1.. w VIEW APPROACHING INTERSECTION DRIVING SOLT111 ON DU AWARE (NOTE STOP' SIGN MID STOP LIKE M JOLIET) ry N I J4 `A•I rt: t � L ��' ..� .I `��A.�r!f•1 1.wry +` yr' tt(M.' SIG14 AND MAHKINGc 3) ON !TME1:r It t r it w C� I VM OF DRIVING NORTH ON JOP.IG'r (NM STOP SIGN { �tp SIP- 17- At VIEV OF IlII`F:RswrIm av xt.IF:r AND DMAWAHE (NOTE: STOP SIGN POLE TO HIGHT. VI-111CLE IS 91I)P'P E.1) AT WHITF: LIMP:,! ToMIS Huntingtw Beach Residents and Property Owne As a. reside�it .and-,'property ,bWhex ii 'this of miitingtcn Bosch, it was with I pleam- Am' that I witnessed the eli.ng of the old house on-' the'.Korth- tist corner of Joliet and : not to far from metre `we are tight now.: MY, tooling, were, *This is Ercat, rInA21y this home will' get the faceli.tt it needs. What a-benerit' to all. of us uiw live nearby." Perhapa you have noticed ttsat uoric `ras stopped' in the tra=U*stage and that no'work tint bee» done• in three months. , This is ;because ;the 'City of Wntington Beach has stopped this project for some reason which I will relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason #t . By. tak ' -off the old siding . stucco : (a that stwun on blueprintssaS fop . Ghee and application . toir�,p,6-Mit) , the owner has cone into' conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (c) ) . This particular section deal3 exclusively with older homes..that do; now met certiln set-back requires:.ats that were changed AFTER the home wasbuilt. Would you prefer that older homes be made more attr�actiuel Reason #2: The Cif also leer. that the hcme is bei ng ing remodeled in exerw. About 325,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had she option of fixing up your older home or neu what �dout ouInto Nanttto o? Do�outteel�t3�at� � a 89 Y Y people should be able to remodel their homes? Personally, I like the blend of 'different homes down here and prefer Huntington Heath Is, 01dTo, nl ounlot area to the tracts. I should alsro mention that ,, making � • in addition` to the` hccoe cleaner, safe, arxi attractive �. . NO ADDITION& SQUARE FOOTAGE, NO ADDITIOPL UNIT, NO ADDMONAL STORM, NO` ADDM(XNAL BEDROOMS are being added. Only, a re=del. MIS PROPERTY, TICS HC IS ON 719. AIDE F'OtJNDATION THAT • IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YFAAS. So, �,:we need your help, the PtARDIG CCr?=ION HEARING IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CM COUNCYL CHAMMMERS at ?PH. PLEASE CO and PIEASE SIGN OUR PETITION. °pecificaL'ly, we ask your support for the completion of th. resvadelirw which makes our neishborhood more attractive and provide a setter hoar for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the =mplation of the remodeling of the home at 503 JoUet, IhIntington Beach, CA. rsacne a .t„q Thank you, !'lark O'Donnell t6 f tt gton Seach Residents a'zd property Owneri: 4 A i D�i[1 j.ng'to[1 ati ti�atrlptiriYttieosedrthr of Hunt Heath it ass with great"pleasure _ eL4ng or the old house on' the North East coarser of Joliet and; , not :to far' from where we are. right tit.';, • .,;tee ' uf.11 get the My' lines were, ."'ibis is great, finally this home facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us Who live nearby.R too tiozic been danicad that Wort uas stopped the tramit*`stage and , not wit hays, e in three, months This is because the City of i.ngton Beach has stopped` this project for some reasons which I win relate to you. Please consider what the 1#1 icatiocss are. ;. the olds >::.. Reason I1 : By. taking off siding to prepare ,the building for. stucco la ;change that was shown on the blueprints and application , for pezmit) the owner has come into coaflict with an ordicv`nce (section 9652 (b) (6) ) . Thi{s particular section deals exclusively with older hwes that do not meet certain set-back,requirements that were changed AF'I M the home was built. would you prefer that older hones be made more attractive? Reason #2: The City also feels tt at the hma is being remodeled in exci ess. About 325,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate mrket to buy,a new-home, what would' you grant to do? Do you feel ttlit I people should be able to. remodel their hoses? Per.4nally, I like ,the blend of 'different homes down here and prefer Huntington Heachls ad di.tioa °t area to the tracts,' I should also mention that 3n in 'adwn/T ,t;&,making the home cleaner, .safe, land attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOG'TAGE, NO ADD,FTIOH& UNIT, NO ADDITIGNAL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL 9EDROUZ are being added. Only a remodel. THIS PROPERTY, MS HCV.P IS ON TM SAME FOUNDATION THAT IT HAS SDI ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS, i So, we need your help, the. PLANNIM COKSMIGN HEARING IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at ',the CITY CC)tINCIL Mee at ?PM. PLEASE COME and PLEASE SIGN OUR. PETITION. Specifi_ 6L .y, ' wo ask your support for .the completion of 'this rexmodeUrAg'-which makes our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better hove emr a local family. I, the undersigned, support the ccmpletion of the remodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, Bmtington Beach, CA: 'ala'." name aaaTess Thank you, Mark O'Donnell To Huntington Beach Residents and Property Ow+nera: . "ide'&'�'and.;propm y owner, in th3.e' or Huntington Beach, it wa, with -`:A� ,a r great ploasut�e that I aritnessed the cling of;" the old house on fhe Borth- Fast ooriier o r. Joliet and` ► not to ra.r from mere;we are right Hare My fee lings ngs were, "This L3-ligreat, finally this home- will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us utio live nearby. " Pertaps`:you have noticed that work- was stopped -in 'the framing`stage and that Huu ,hBbeen has sin three months. This is becauac the `City'of • ington, peed this project for some reascns w'hich' I will ret ate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason #1: stucco ttakinga of f old sdinr� _to prepare the .building for : .. ( charge that was rhoun on the blueprints''and application for permit) , the owner has cove into-;_conflict with an ordinance, (section 9652 .(b) (0) . This particular Section deals exclusively,with older homes that do, not .met certain set-back requirments that were changed RFTER the home was built. Would you preff.- that older homes be made more attractive? Reason 2: y spent and that is a mere fraction of the The City also feels that the home is being remodeled in excess. About $25,000 is being . pen cost of a new home. If you had the option •of fiiij* uA your older. home or going out into this real cstate mare et to buy a new"home, what would you Want to do? Do .you feel-thit: ' le should be able to remodel their how-s? Personally, I like tr:oj blend of different homes down here and prefer Htmtington Beach's,, O1dTownlTownlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to making the horn: cleaner, We, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 1 .40 ADDITIONAL UM, ;NO ADDITIOML SMRIES, NO ADDMCNAL BEDROOMS are being added. Only,'a remodel. . THIS PROPERTY, THIS HOME IS ON :hz SAW. FOUNDATION THAT IT HAS BM ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, 'We need your help, tho: PLANNING COK-UM101i 1EAFING IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at;-;the CITY COUNCIL CHAi�F� at 7F4. PLEASE CCFZ and PL SIGN OUR PETITION. Specifically, we ask your support for the ccopktion of this modeling which makes our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better home for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the recadeling of the borne at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. /11**?�eLz�� 10,10 &—ld-Yo 11c'11� address I lbank you, Mark O'Donnell 1 t To Huntington Beach Residents and Property Owners: M a resident andproperty caner in- �t1nt Beach : , it was with great; pleasure that I vitne9sed the 3rit of the old house on the North«► _ Fist'corner ;of Joliet and , not; to far: from wh6re we I are right ma.; My reeling, were, wMis is .great, f i,:nally this.home wi11. get the facelift it need.3. 1 Tat a-benefit to &U of us who live nearby. " Perhaps",You 1 have noticed '. • , , . .; r , t.�t work Was ,stopped in 'the ,stage and that amitotic', Yeas , d irr, three .months: This' is because tha City ,or reha�YOU. Please consstoider what wha the'project f��soa+�a�;;ir,,3socLs ti+hi.c.3� I xill Y imp ns are. Reason #1 : By off the old- ai6mg to prepare..the building'for stucco to change that was shown on. the blu£printo' and application for.;'permit) ', the owner 'has came into conflict with an orciinance``(section 9,652 .(b) (c y) This particular section deals exclusively with older homes that do; not met ce rtain set-back requirements that were changed AFTER the home was built. Would you prefer that older hoses be made more attractive? Raason #2: The City also feels that the home is being raraadeled `in excess. About 325,000 is being spent and that is a Mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you,had the option of ,fixing up Your older home or going out into this real estate market to buy a new,home, what would you want to do? Do you 'feel that people should be able to remodel their homes? Peery, I. like the blend of different hods down here and prefer aunbington Beach t s O1dTown/Towmlot area to the tracts. I should aLw waition that in addition; to making the"home cleaner, , safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE F(WAGE, NO ADDM.1O!NAL U1f1 T, NO ADDMONAL STORES, NO ADDITIONAL HEDRMAIS are being added. Only a recodel. TKIS PROPERTY, THIS HOE IS ON THE SAM FUNMATION THAT IT HAS BM ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your heap, the PL.A.NNY,NG Ct+MSION !FARM IS ON AUGUST,A16, 1988 at the CITY (VMCIL CHAMWS at 7PM. PLEASE CCM and PLXASE SIGN WR PETITION. Specifically, we ask your support for the c cmpletion of this rvmodeL ng 6 tich makes our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better hone for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the remodeling of the home "AtqJoliet, tington Beach, C.A. Thank you, ?!ark O'Donnell : To Huntington Beach 'Residerita and Property O,*ers As a ,rewx den t and� owner'ire� ., . . . Pro P�Y� thla � of Huritingt;on. Beach, it w�. xith p . that-, I witnessed the cling of the old. house 'an,the Horth- Ea_sttcoeoer_1 ofof Joliet and` , not to far fr�a�m' Where wi are right. Er rx . !'!y f inally this 'home` Were, "Thi.3 is great, f ``home will get the facelift it needs What a benefit to all of u3 who ]rive. nearby. " Pernaips i you have noticed that work' Kw stopped in' ,the fiamit�g �tag+e and that rk has ' been done in three mcnths. i This ia because:.'the City. of ' tington Beach".has stopped this -project for some masons wtAch I will relate to you. Please consider utat the implications are. Reason #1 : By taking off .the, old siding to prepare the buildirK3' tnr' ' r it) the arner has ccxae `into conflict kith ucco (a cthahge that was shown on then blueprints and application ordinance (section 9652- (b) (c)) This particular sectionit deals exclusively with older he me•9 that do not met certain set-back requirements that were changed AFTER the home was built. Would you prefer that older homes be made more attractive? Reason 12: The City also reels that the home is being modeled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction`of 'the cost of a new ham. If you had the option of fixing up your older horse, or going out into this real estate market to buy' a new home, what Would you cant to do? Do you feel that people should be able to remodel their homes? Personally, I Lice the blend of different homers:dorm here and prefer Huntington Beach's Oldrown/Tc�nlot area to the tracta. I should also mention I that in addition to cam the home cleanea•, sate and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL. SQUARE FOOTAGE, Na ADDITIONAL UNIT, ,NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS are being added. Only a remodel. . TffS FROPEATY, THIS H0,E IS CAN THE SAME FOUNDATION THAT IT HAS BF" i ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, ..we need your help, the PLAN MC- 02+ffSSION HEARM 7S ON AUGUST' 16, 1988 at I the CITY COUNCIL CHAMEM at 7PM. PLEASE COPE and PLEASE.SIGN OUR PETI'i'ION. Specifically, we ask your support for the c oci pletion of, this r odeling,which crakes our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better home for a local family. . I It , the undersigned, support the completion of the remodeling of the home at 503 Joliet tington Beach, M. name Thank you, Ku*.. O'Donnell Toy;; Huntington, Beach Residents and Property Ownp-. s Jts a rei'd `exit and ro comer. 'in thfs P PAY o� Hunt . , i.n8tcr� beach it w8.i' ,with , .at Pleasure 'that I witnessed .the cling of tie old house on: the North- East corner,- of Joliet and ndiassa` , not"..to far `from Whei we are right - .. rQW%-,,MY 'feelings ►ere, ^'This ig` gnat, 2snal l.y this licne' 'WM get the J 11 facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us who live nearby." Perhaps iyou` have noticed that. wont:was stopped in the fr�aariiig stage and that no.work been ;''done in three months. This *.is because the;`City of Miitlngt.66 Bch has stopped this project for some reasons ►,rtiich I will relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason #1: gY, taki off the old siding to prepare the ',build.ing 'tor stucco (a change that was shown on the blueprints and application for, permit) , the owner, has come into conflict with 'an' ordinan`ce (section 9652_ (b) (c) ) . Tliis particu,Lar section deals exclusively with older homes that do not met certain set-back requizvments that were changed AFTER , the home was built. Would you prefer that older homes be made chore attractive? Reason 12: The City also reels that the hcLe is being rewdeLed in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cosh of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your . � new home what would out into thiz dreal estate.,market to' buy`' a older home or , y ? Do you feel' that le should be able to remodel their noses? Personally, T lipthe blend of ". iffereat tomes down here and prefer Huntington B�ach,'s O1dTownlTownl.ot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition.to making the ,home cleaner, safe, , and attractive, NO ADDM1 ONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, .NO ADDITIMAL LQM I J;O ADUI"TICM STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL. BEDROOMS are being added. Only, a remodel. THIS PROP=, THIS HCFEE IS ON THE MME MMATION THAT IT HAS Bel ON FOR OVER 50 YL?US. so, - need your ,help, the Ps.ANNIWO CL' +USSLON I ARDC IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS at ?PH. PLEASE CCFSE and PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION. Specific a.11y, we ask your support for the completion of this rrrsaodeLing which makes our neighborhood xrire attractive and provide a better home for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the rewdeling of the home at 503 Joliet, ffimtington Beach, •CA: name address , I 1&w* you, Mark O'Donnell i i j .. TO Hun t ingto� Beach Resident3 and property Owners. As a rira3dent and propex.ty owner -in . , 8�'e8tt ; 1 this f Hur�tinktwh Bi each ' it � 'With P easuo Jthat I xitnessed thi r e ling of the old h;7use ' East garner liet and to tar f on. the' firth- raw. My reef wart, nnijs is. li�nat.I,l. where we ii* rat y this, home'w44,, t'.the facelift it nee13, What a benefit to ahh of us who Live nearby. P M You hive noticed that uor.k WM3 stopped in the f n8 atag+e and that a, no ;work:has been `done in three paths. ,1`hs is becauft the 'City-of Hunt -1 isaton Beach has sto Peed this project for some reasom which T will relate t6 you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason #1: B tataking off the siding to preps •the build{rsg tor. change sham an the blueprints and application for Permit), the owner has come into conftiet 'vith an ordinance (section ,9652 (b) (c?) . This Would particular suction desks exclusively with older hems that do not 'met"certain built. ck requirements that +ere changed A� 'tha home was youprefer that older:homes be made sore attracti. ? Reason 42: The City also feels that the home is bei ng resaade3ed fn excess• About $25,000 is being spent and aat is, a mere. fraction of the cost or a new hope. If you had the option of fixing up yo4r older home or ,going oiit into � this ,real estate mer�k�t. new home, whitto,'� a would you want to do? Do you feel that peoplo s?',maid be able to remodel thP- ir homes? PersotzalZl Z like the blend of different homes down: here and prefer Huntington,BWch's Old'ro6+tiTow.rsot area to the tracf:9. I Mould also mention that is addition to caking ,the home cleaner, safe, anC attractidre NO- ADDITIONAL SQUARE FWrAGE, W.1 `DD1T?CMAj_ UNTT, NO ADDITION& MRIEZ, NO ADDITIONAL BEDRWIS are being added. CtUy a remodel 'THIS PROPI1'Y, THIS IM IS ON THE SAME FOMATIM TMT IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we reed your help,, the PLAN;,M CXX' tSS10N Mann IS CS AtX'= .16, 19M CIT at the Y COUNCII, Ch.MM at 7M. PLEASE CcRE and FLFJ=j MGN OUR PETITION. Speci_+'ically, ' we ask your support for the coaipletion o1' this � remodeling which na.kes our ne home for a local Family• igbborhOOd more attractive and provide a better. I, the undersigned, support the completioq of the remodeling of the I home at 503 Joliet, Huntington ileach, i,A•' name add eaB Thank you, Merle O'Donnell 41)Awriorlreo to Pac,r,f.h A(3owt,semen%l of 0 >.+. ':S M0013+r+p Nb&4 t'.- C,11' Micas oY Oecteo Gi the Superior Court of orange County. 1 0� oahlotnrt- NumCet A•6214. Oalsd 29 September. 1961, and 1 G A•24e]1. tit%od t 1 J',ne. 1963 a STATE OF Ct 1.IFORNIA4.0 County of Orangr. .,.p.., . •er"rWW4 I*-Wed emdowl .0 �.H la tYL�[h/ti+OMCr� JJ y, I am a Citizen of the United States and a resident o! the County aforesaid. I�am over the age of eighteen + + yews. and not a party to or interested in the belowFLANOM04 entitled matter- I am a principal clerk of the Orange �" r Coast DAILY PILOT. with which is combined the NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation. 12MWT 1041 114?.1 IuKt4y' 04 ' !leach y Cowult+tit s printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa. a M+�Wr,plt�i~wt'�tW4 di Ca�+rat'er NM'?iutt j County of Orange. State of California. and that a �' x I Notice of public ltearipg two cift and be t�aabie!bylaw' raka►tt� h, +oa+a�IN' 1>�t ittaht*-�r+Ms.ot I i1Z f}M><a�l �toD'11�EL°t lQ btl tdaM 14� eM sty. of whictti coFy attached hereto is a true and complete ' ,.' copy, was printed and published in the Costa Mesa, pw 1>p T.Amgur ' Newport Beach, Huntington Beach. Fountain Valley. (44 oh�tis�oa'a D►• Irvine. the South Coast communities and Laguna tt " '• 6eaCh I newspaper of said newspa e, for _ one ( 1 ) ApPt,1GAKt. MOW.,; aaa�twa consecutive weeks to wit the issurAs) of Mery ,4 fi+t►at''0' LOCAT10ft SWa1644v�r lemur!.6Wat�,eaKs'+,g6tt'rRt;d soiiae� end�*� jj, September 6 8.._a.� • r11CPOSAt.. � ►. :� nGal,�G') a.rtlQtMt{t,} Ae•�' i .�twtiar�`f6rr..mri sQoet er• ty�q#fa trastoactt:>', .ai � . 198 lifiWYrtt MMENT.ilr xtraTv4;1'Wvatxte Nsa is 0XMMWI C.'s t i 01111%tort ra a"V&8401-0., tloh. tssos ': rent ,►ht pvftw a ot r71t!ter' ! - A µicy 6�.tt4 196 f4ta�t1+e ior�wt= al .rip ff*.V l7• ►o.. "19M+nea .-1000 -larfalf}; sot, 1lirntlttplt>Rt'AqG.++i,' a, I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the ALL tfirt ttr t�''` ea ttia" wo 1"mo l to_+errd foregoing is true and correct. ,K„o atar►rf� itrt�:aiew�et► forty fete a�lwe►�n Executed an See t emb e r 9 l 198 a M `.el is es at Co Mesa, Catiforni �;°'t��'�taoil�'tw� i�� *ter l ,l'kr�rrM+tMttittn�:tt�ll�oh,; PROOF 0 F PUBLICATION � y t''"" 1 _ Leggy) Natite City of Huntington Beach ....-.. .... .. _. .,r /ti u�. — office of the City ClerkCk e - P. 0. Box 190 •re w.Y r 1, � � t Huntington Beucf CA 92648t. � ,. . ,.. - �.� .' � •: i � , i Air. ' Gecs.2ge W 6-Look Prato ,Tz FIRST CLASS MAIL t� li y , 1 t. • L17 -- - -- --- - - - ,. • 1 1 i►e S, s i t i j 0 to i ` Legal Notice Cites of Huntington Beach w Y office of the City Clerk �`�;:►*'i , J� P. O. Box 19014 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 r, ;, � � r r u S .T- *w, � � � � � • , Ce\may,, ' FIRST CLASS MAIL t. Publish HQTII= QF Z TEiLIC HFJLRING APPEAL .70 PLANNING S OF Z�N 17I MAL USE PERXIINO. 88-31 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN t it the RuntIngton MEE City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington' Beach Civic Center , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California , on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. Dom: Monday, September 19, 1988 7 :00 PM Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Lenial of Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 APPLIC.ANT: Mark F. O' Donnell a1!PEL1JUgT: Rogers S Hartley, Attys . , on behalf of Mark F. O' Donnell 503 Joliet Avenue (Northeast corner cf Joliet Avenue and Delaware Street) Appeal of Planning Conmzission' s denim of a request to permit exterior altcration to an existing single family dwelling that is non-conforming with regard to setbacks , parking, and building separation. E�YT.139�NEW& .STATUS: The proposed project is exempt Class I Section 15301 and Class 5 Section 1.5305 from the provieict:s of California Environmental Quality Act . ON ZILE: A copy of the -proposed project and appeal are file in the Department of Coma.,unity Qevelopme.r-i ` 2000 fain Street, Huntington Bench, CA 92648 . � ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hnaring ' and express opinions or submit evidence $,or or; against the application as outlined above . All applications , exhibits , and descript;ib�t• df this proposal are on file with the Office of the City Clark,, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, for Inspection by the public. H'UNTINGTON BEACH . CITrY COUN^IL By: Connie Brockway Ci ty .Cleat Phone 014), 53 6-54 04 Dated 11506-2) t: Legal Notice City of Huntington Beach Office of the City Cleric P. O. Box 190 Huntington 84nch.CA 9264$ Kenneth iltant Sty JoUct Ave. Hwtt�uty;cart nedCit, CA. 92648 FLU FIRST CLASS MAIL , PLANT Nl1rTMrGrQw llACll � ;r.' ,, 1 Publ i sh NXISE OF MLIC UlUING ,APPF-AL TO OF OND AKA USE pENINk �ii SSNO,� Nam.1i� NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVER that the Tuntin§Un ea City Council will hold a' public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who Irish to be heard relative to the application described below. p,BZ'S: Monday, September 19 , 1988 .TJM: 7: 00 PM .Appeal of Planning Commission ' s venial of Cniditional Use Permit No. 88-31 AYTI M: Mark F. O 'Donnell APFELLAM Rogers 6 Hartley, Attys . , on behalf' of Mark F. O' Donnell : 503 Joliet Avenue (Hartheast corner of Joliet Avenue j and Delaware Street) 2$QF9SAL: Appe--1 of. Planning Corunission' s denial of a request to permit exteriur alteration to '.in existing single family dwelling that is n,nn-conforming with regard to setbacks , pRrking , and huilding separation. gYxg4MXUAL STA S: The proposed project is exempt Class I Section 1.5301 and Class 5 Section 15305 from the provisions of California EnvirAnmental Quality Act . A Copy of the proposed project and Appeal am on file in the Uepartmbnt of Community Development 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for. or against the application as outlined above. All applications, axhibite , and descriptions of this propoital are on file with the Office of the City Clerk, VDO Main Street , Huntington Beach, Califorrlia , for Inspection by the public . HUNTINGT`ON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Connie Brockway City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5404 bated (115Od-2) `f i "OTON' ' BEACH CITY OF HUNTING ' 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK October 3, 1988 Rogers & Hartlev A Law Corporation 17111 Beach Boulevard, W to 103 Huntington Beach, CA 92647-5999 7h Council of the: City of Ntanlin tan Beach at its regular meeting e CityCity 9 9 g held September 19, '1988, granted your appeal relative to Conditiorinl Use t Parivit No. 88-31 property located at 503 Joliet Avenue. this approval was based on revised findings and amendefa -ondiltions. � IF you have any questions r2c arding this matter, plenav call this Cow.unity Development Department aL 536-5271 . Zonnic Brockway CMC City Clerk CB:MC CC : Mark O'Donnell - i i { ,s - — - REQUE i FOR CITY COUNCli ACTION I' Date Se2Umber 19 , 1988 I Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Ccunci 1 ` t Submitted by: Paul Cook , City Administratort;- [ Prepared by: Mike Adams, .Acting Director , Community Development` tt .Subject: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF COND � l PERMIT NO. Bb-31 V fl 4.y Consistent with Council Policy? Yes [ 1 Nsw F<aliry or Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Fund[ay Source. Aiter4a c 1 S,. rnetrts: STATEMENT OFLSSIUE: Transmitted for your considerat;on is an appeal submitted by Rogers S Hartley, Attorneys , on behalf of Mark F. O' Donnell , to the Planning Commission 's denial of Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 (Applicant: Mark F. O' Donnell) . Conditional Use Permit No . BB-31 is a request to permit exterior alteration to an existing single family dwelling located at 503 Joliet'. Ave-nue, that is non-conforming With regards to building setbacks , parking, and building separation. RECOMMEUM'I0: P l a n n i 11g__C91tai.sJQ n Action a nc Rer,.Qmm c� tttl..o f A u ctu t ISS. 19 8 8 : f ON MOTION DY SILVA AND SECOND BY KIRKLANJ* THE PLANNING C=IISSION CONSIDERED APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 140. 88-31.0 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES : Silva , Kirkland NOES : Livengood, Leipzig , Ortega , Higgins ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None MOTION TO APPROVE FAILED ON MOTION BY LIVENGOOA At;D SECOND BY HIGGINS, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-31 , WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE : AYES: Livengood, Higgins, Leipzig, Ortega NOES: Silva, Kirkland ] ABSENT: States ABSTAIN: done r s 4 :r rite 5/ft 4 FjND1,i3GS_ ''yQA 1_ENIAL; ' I . The proposed structure will not be compatible with adjacent . properties because it encroaches within the front yard and Exterior side yard setbacks, as well as in the public right-of-way at the corner or Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue. 2 . Substantial alteration as proposed will be det .•.-.T!vatal to the general welfare. of }persons uorkis:g or residin4 :Y ',he vicinity because the structure will preclude improvemei-.1;Z. within the public night-of-way, and will impede sight distance at the co_ aer 'of Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue. 3 . Although the property is irregular in configuration, the sizO of the lot satisfies the minimum size o; 2, 500 square feet- and exceeds the minimum frontage of 30 feet_ Therefore, the conditional use permit ic. not necessary to preserve a substantial property right . 4 . Encroachment into the requited setback is not compatibla with setbacks established for properties to the north, south, east and crest and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent with limitations upon those properties . Staff Reco.¢nendatio Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the Planning Corunission' s denial of Conditional Use Permit No . 08--31 and deny the appeal , based on the findings outlined above. The subject site is a 54 Foot by 55 foot parcel located at the northeast corner of Delaware Street and Jcliet Avenue . The existing structure is an .approximately 1, 100 square foot single Afaatily dwelling constructed in 1920, that does not conform with the standards of the Oldtown Specific Flan with regard to enclosed ' parting, building separation, and front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks . The applicant is proposing to substantially , altar the interior and exterior of the dwelling , including rn-framing, re-roofing, electric&l and plumbing improvements, changing interior walls, replacement of windows, removal of a porch and shed, and stuccoing of the exterior. Section 9652 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code states that non-conforming structures shall not be enlarged or altered or: the eztexion. in any manner unless they Planning: Commission permits aucr alteration subject to approval of a conditional use permit %nd conformance with all of the following conditions : ( 1) That ' the alteration is necessary to secure added safety or reduce tho '',ire hazard and/or improve the aesthetic appeut-ancQ of the structure's architecture by bringing tha design into greater conformance: with the surrounding neighbo:hood. RCA 9/19/88 ..`_ (1243d) (2) That the alteration shall not increase the number of stories . 13 ) Thst regardle3s of any alterations, tt,e floor area shall not exceed more than 10 percent of .he floor area the structure contained at the time the structure was classified as non-conforming . (4) That a set of plans covering the alteration be submitfted for approval as to location, des:ian, color, ar,.d general architecture, and any work completed shall be in conformance with those plans. The applicant ' s requests to demolish a room of the house (excepting the foundatioit) and reUuild constitutes an alteration which falls under this section, and therefore a conditional use permit is regilired. Non-conforming Asper. J5 .9f_ L-he_..si.t-e Although the subject duelling as addressed on Joliet Avenue, the site frontage facing Delaware Street is narrower, and therefore considered by Code to be the front property line . The structure is set back three feet from the front property line on Delaware Street and one foot from the exterior side Property line along Joliet Avenue . The Code requires a 15 foot front setback end a 5 foot exterior side fare setback. After the required street dedication for the corner radius, the main dwelling will not only encroach into the setbacks , but will also project approximately 50 square feet into the public right-of-way and approximately 220 square feet into the required corner cutoff (see Attachment 4) . An Existing one-car garage is located at zero . foot setback along the interior side and rear property lines in lieu of the required 5 feet and 7 . 5 feet, respectively. The one-car garage is also non-conforming because a two-car garage is currently requirec'' for single family dwellings . Lastly, the garage and dwelling unit are separatecO by approximately 3 feet, while the Code currently requires a 10 foot separation between buildings. Ent. dement History The following is a brief chronology of avents conccrning this application . May 3 . 1988 . A building permit was issued by the Department of Community Development for a number of alterations to the . existing structure. it was the understanding of the Planning rtaff that the exterior walls of the non-conforming structure would not lye impacted, and therefore, the modifications would fall under Code. Section 9652(a) , which permits interior xepairs/alterations and re-roofing for hearth and safety purposes . The Planning staff member who issued the permit Pkannin counter, andlwhent uestionedwabout�the�sco a oftwork �1 iindica�ted that t o 9 9 P � the applicant indicated that no exterior alteration would occur. RCli - 9/19`88 -3 (1243d) �- ��. - - : ...,.. -mar.■.w+a..r: 'srRiis ,�l�,�y7•.. .�.-....�--_...._...-w+17 44r MAY 4 , building inspectorer notice indluate6 that the work, undertaken on the site did not match t::::L down on the plans, and that preliminary work had begun wit'hout benefit of t building permits . Mny 5. 198,B. A stop work order was issued by band Use Enforcemc-r,t for possible non-compliance with Cpide Suctinn 9652(b) , regarding exterior alterations to anion-conforming structure. The applicant was required to suAmit revised plans to the plan checker for verification of setback and ; 'iroperty line dimensions . May 25 ,.,. 1988 , A letter was seat from Mike Strange, Senior Planner, to Mark O'Donnell, stating that a conditional use permit application would need to be `fled based on the non-conforming previsions of the Cade anej the type of work to be undertaken (i .e. complete refraining of the major room closest to DelawarA) . JUly jai 1908 . A letter was sent from Mike Adams, Planning Director, to Mark O ' D.ar<hell , again stating the requirement for I filing of a corditlUaal use permit and c:ondiNsonal exception . (Staff has since determine) that a conditional exception is not required) . • ZUly 15 • 1982 . Application fot Monditional Use Permit No . 88-31 filed. Intent of n-ConforMirsa eroy„1.sfans The expressly stated intent of the non-conforming provisions of the Code is to protect the public health, safety, acid welfare (Section 9650) . This goal is accomplished by restricting the improvement of non-conforming structures to those modifications necessary for health and safety, and/or to bring the aesthetics of the structure into conformance wa.th the neighborhow.-4 . The provisions are intended to allow minor alterations that do not extend the reasonable expected life of the structure, Pnd expressly prohibit such major alteration3 as increasing the floor firea by more than 10 percent , or increasing the number of stories . Within these limitations, the Planning Commission discretion over requested exterior alterations . If major cha:;ges are proposed, then it Is , required to bring the entire itmicture Into conformance with the zoning code. it is staffs determination that this proposal does ;no" constitute a minor alto-%tion in conformance with the intent of the ' _''ode . It ,involves re--roofing and substantial demolition and rebtA ;ding of one room (except foundation) , significant floor plan changelt which include relocations of the kit^hen, dining room, living room, bedroom, and additional ::athroom, and now plumbing and electrical wiring . Moving the kitchen to the front room of the s t r uct:u re places It within three feet of the Delaware Street right-of-way. (See attachmetzt No. 3 of Planning Coniission staff report dated RCA 9/19/88 �-4- ( 1243d) August 161 1988) . The existing non--conforming portion of the house within the setback and corner radius area is currently designated as one large front room. As one large room, it would be possible to modify it so as to conform with the setback requirements without affecting the current layout of the house (see Attachment No . 7 of the RCA) . It would also allow partial expansion of the living room, dining and kitchen along Joliet meeting part of the applicant ' s objective to modernize the structure . This would bring the house into conformance with the setback requirements and be more compatible with the setbacks of adjoining parcels . Although the exterior appearance of the dwelling would undoubtedly be improved, the applicant ' s proposal essentially involves replacement of major portions of the structure, thus greatly increasing the expected life of the structure . Because of the extreme degree of non-conformity in the setbacks, staff feels that it would not be appropriate to make such alterations without obtaining adequate setbacks . hd1acent DeveloP1Lent Adjacent development consists of single family homes and small multi-unit developments to the north, hest and south, which have been developed to existing Oldtown Font setback standards of 15 feet . To the east are older single family homes facing Joliet, which are set back approcimately 6 feet from the front property line . The subject proposal would therefore be- inconsistent with established front setbacks in the vicinity. k.reet Dedica icon and C2raer—Cu.t--OU ` The Department of Public Works requires that the applicant dedicate a 20 foot come: radius at the corner of Joliet Avenue and Delaware Street, to be utilized for sidewalks and parkway improvements . There are cu:rent~ly no sidewalks abutting the site . As shown in the- attached diagram, the existing structura encroaches ;ixproximately 50 square feet itivo this right-of-way area . The Code also requires that no structures over 42 inches tall can project into a triangular corner cut- off area formed by measuring 25 feet from the { intersection of the front and exterior side 'property lines or their prolongation. This area is intended to provide adequate sight distance from a vehicle stopped at the intersection. The existing j structure encroaches approximately 220 square feet into the corner cutoff . The applicant ' s requested improvements would adversely 'impact public safety by extending the life of the structure such that attainment of public improvements and an adequate corner cut-off would be unreasonably delayed. Prior to the Planning Commission hearing, staff received a latter 1 from a near-by resident Who contends , that a portion of the subject J building was a store from 1920 to 1963 , and that gasoline tanks may ' still be located underground . Staff has been unable to confirm ttiese allegations through available records . RCA '- 9/19/88 -5- (1.24 3d) As an alternative to denial of the site plan, the City Council may wish to consider approval o E a modified site plan, which would allow a 'portion of the non-conforning structure to remain, and Fellow for additions which meet Code. Those portions of the structure that encroach into the corner cutoff and the public right-of-way should be removed. Additionally, the front yard and exterior side yard setbacks should be made to more closely conform with setbacks in the immediate vicinity. Staff does not feel that these modifications would render the lot unusable because the lot does exceed the minimum area of 2, 500 square feet required by the Old town Specific Plan. The site is 2, 910 square feet before the corner dedication, and 2, 884 square feet after the corner dedication . The site angle corner cut-off restricts another 226 . 5 square feet of the 1L)t , leaving 2, 657 . 5 square feet of lot area outside the radius and corner cut-off area . The unusual size and shape of the lot compared to others In the vicinity may impose a .land-related hardship, and therefore, there may be some grounds for a conditional exception (variance) to so►ne required setbacks , providing the dwelling did not encroach into the public right-of--way or site-angle area impacting public safety. It is possible that the building square footage removed in these areas could be located on a second level . The Code does not prohibt a second story if the structure is brought into conformance with the �. code, or is non-conforming Q..nly as to setbacks. For those reasons, 1 staff does not feet that denial or modification of the applicant 's request would preclude All development an the site . ZNMIR122QMEUAL ST IUS: This project is exempt Class I Section 15301 and Class 5 Section 15305 from the provisions of the California Environmental. Quality Act . Not applicable. AL ATIYG-_.=BM: The City Council may approve Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 with findings For approval, subject to a modified site plan which more closely conforms with Code requirements . ATTACHMUff,$.: I . Area Map 2 . Appeal Letter dated .August 24 , 1988 3 . Staff Report dated August 16, 1980 . 4 . Article 965, Huntington Beach Ordinance Code 5 . Latter from Charles Black dated August 11, 1988 6 . Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated August 16, 1988 7. Alternative site plan MX: LPtgbm RCA_ 9/1.9/88 -6- '(1293d)' a1 V 4 "L_j wti.+ L_j i—J An� s _j ,_...�.. A Ai Q A•1 R•! i•I R2 i •i" ��i• + y ;'IWhDttr Y_C2 _ �( (Yu.. {`� �-t+�wfrYf•'� j • fit R, RI hi OR At A �wR �SW. �� �'O �:,�I�Ttt/�t�aa . » � � . a T. tti A: as sit alR -� o f ..r��•—r ° �' C r ol RI ... . . N •— •-�1� ■crows � ��- JV A! at -o 0 o r.o N rr R aanta r �' •� # Rs I RI l_�_� ii 1• ..^-wsl / L A, Rt i s TCS�N�SPECIyFtf�ry •: Ri 11 �.• •p' PLA11 R ,rAT TWO) 1(>tD� : � � � •. I (, CF-RAlm RI 71 ca •yl' '�.wr`, t .(.� jis J• R! at Ili �' ;- •� � � t A .:�t CY .s t R! � •. j • t l ` ~ �1 � 7{� �''�1��y((��J{�� f if, RI J(i l - _ .i R IaIC : { ;c. u RI Rt s to .1•l .w . : F;LA f ws{ a,s Rs,c i- f • „ tt _- ' � N ,1 I R17 at t _ b R)�, c.. A 7t .s.� f* t 1jj L }� = • �.:� �{.J � _t � �__�______ —j ,st1 •1/• �, ---r= �—.___"A1 to Lu HUNfTINGTON REACH PLANNING DIVISION r , t vlY CURA ROG ERS & HA RTL.EY CITY Dr FIUI(�It+IS'►r�e �Ca;r1l.L>;Llr. �. I,aw COaPC�awtlC•� j GCOROC L POWERS 1711i DEAC•r 90U&.CVA,1O, SUITr ,O] JV LC9 J. MAgrLCr OCOROC C. WILLIAMSON MUNTINGTOPI HCACk, CALI/Gg1#1J% SM547.509GO RALPH A, LOYO Tf.�tf'•+O•IC i7`AI ,l�7.9R+ August 24 , 1988 TO: CONNIE BROCKW.AY , CLERK OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, AND TO THE MIA. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 11UNTINGM1 BEACH: Re: Application for Conditional Use: Permit No , 88-:j1 , for 503 Joliet- Street , Huntington Beach, California Ladies and Gentlemen : I. . PLEASE TAKE C.C►T.ICE that Applicant , MarkF. O'Donnell, heru"Dy appeals from the decision of the Planning Commission of ivaunt 16 , 1988 , denying his Application for a Conditional Use { co improve the property located at 503 Joliet Street, tiuz:tington Beach , California . Enclosed is the $ 165 . 00 fee tur this appeal . 1I . S'I'r?T EMSENT OF FACTS : A. Applicant is a liuntingtr)n Beach businessman, anti r.;tie a q u n t o: the, owner of the: subject prouurty that: is located at t hu aort:h{�4ayt corner of Joliet and Delaware. B. The subject property is a 54 x 55 fuot parcel that t ,.l.; used as a single family home , of approximately 1 , 100 square~ feet , and is estimated to tie at ?east sixty ( 60) years old. AttijChcd hereto as 'rizb 41 is a letter dated August 19 , 1988 , fxarn Bob iteyncIeJs , a £carraor: tonzoit , e stablitshing that said property was usecl as d i't:`a1L''..'i1l::t. . Pictures of the property ill its candi.- tion pr ioz to May of 1988 pare attached unctcr Tab 92 . it in uncontroverted that at that time , tht- property was an eyesort_ and a knight on the neighbor hood . C. The subject property was and is a pre--axinting non -conforming use at the tirrj- the Cit.� adopted the bic?town Specific Plan, anc; is located in District 1 of the Oldtown area, and a map is attached as Tab 13 . D. The Applicant applied for a building permit 'tart May 3 , 1938 , with plans that clearly showed changes to the vxterios walls . Those plains;. clearly ::state: and depict where: the exterior. , waLLs were to be lac sated. Those plans are attached as Tat) #4 and c those plans were stamped approved by the Planning Departmestt of. the the City of Huntington Beach. The Applicant: also submitted 'a y narrative description of the proposed improvementh, 'which specif- ically referred to the exterior wails , which' narzativr~ i�. ,atM r r` August 24 , I968 . Page 2 tached as Tab #5. At times and plares the word "walls" was stricken from that narrative and replaced with the word "doors" by persons whose handwriting is unknown to Applicant and the deletion of the word "walls" from that document was not dis- covered by Applicant until August 16 , 1988 . Applicant alto submitted the Plot Plan , the: Proposed rloor Plans , and a render- ing depicting they project on completion , attached as Tabs 16 , 17 and 18 , respecLively. Additionally, Applicant submitted struc- tured engineering calculations dated May 3 , 1988 to show the stability of the proposed project, a copy of which is attached hereto as Tab €9 . E. The application for a building permit, Tab #5 , was approved and a building permit was issued on May 3 , 1988 , and a copy of that permit is attached as Tab # 10 . A limited arnount of work , principally demolition , occurred prior to the issuance of the permit , as a resillt of a misunderstanding by the Applicant ' s contractor. F. Applicant relied upon the issuance of said build- ing permit and through the use of a crew of eight (8) workmen, after the permit was issued , proceeded to c:,:use a portion of the: work contemplated by the project to take place on May 3 , 1988 " May 4 , 1988 , and 2-lay 5o 1988 . Photographs depicting the par- tially completed work , as of May 5 , 1996 , are attached as Tab G. On May 5 , 1988 , a Stop Worn. Order was issued by the City ' s Land Use Enforcement Unit for an alleged non- compliance with Huntington Beach Code 3 9652 (b) , and demand was made on ;Applicant to revise: his plans in a wa,y that would r f the work ::had: had been done, and require destruction of most o h . also cause Applicant to build a structure that was not usable . The Stop Work Order is attached as Tab 012 . It. On May 25 , 1988 , Applicant was notified by letter by Mike Strange, the City ' s Senior Planner , that a Conditional Use permit would be needed, and that letter is Attached as Tab # 13 . I . an July 15 , 1988 , the Application for Conditional Use Permit was filed, which application is uet forth in Tab 114 . - Notice was given to 56 neighbors , whose names are set forth in the nailing list attached hereto as Tab #15 , and none of those persons objected to the issuance of it Conditional Use Permit . J. On August 16 , 1988 , the Staff. Report was filed with the Planning Commisnion, which report is� net forth in Tab 116 . Said report is silent as to whether the project secures added safety and admits that the project involves now cilectrical wiring , which reduces fire haazards , and the report also admits LJli9/007 .l August 24 , 1988 page 3 that the aesthetic appearance of the structure will be improved. Said report cuntains no information as to whether the pro jec:t' s design is in greater conformance with the surrounding neighbor- hood, but instead focuses solely upon the inanediately adjacent development . Said report recommended denial of the application, +: arguing that Code g 9652 (b) impliedly prohibits alterations that extend the reasonable life of: the structure. Also, the Oldtown Specific Plan contains greater set-back and corner cut-off requirements than were required when the structure was built. The Applicant' s approved plans had no impact on the existing set- backs , and provided a greater corner cut-off than before, but t1le Staff recommended denial of the Application for a Conditional Use f Permit because the structure did not fully conform to the current requirements for set -back, and corner cut-offs . No finding , how- ever , was made that there would not be: greater conformance with Y the surrounding neighborhood. K . On August 16 , 1988 , Applicant inade an uncontro- z ve:rted showing before the Planning Ccmmis,ion as follows: t 1 . The site was a forrie:r _-yesore, and the proj- ect would beautify the area. 2 . Denial would result in litigation costing the taxpayers over $200 ,000 . 00 for the owner' s damages. 3 . Denial would result in the structure contin'a - ing to be a blight on the neighborhood. 4 . Denial would result in loss of public; cor:fi- dence in the system. 5 . Approval was favored by all persons who spoke to the Planning Commission and the only concern of the owner of the adjacent property on Joliet was merely that the structure of the garage wall on the site be stabilized , which was an accept- able condition to Applicant. ` 6 . Approval of a Conditional Use Permit would save the taxpayers at least $200 , 000 . 00 in damages for which the City would otherwise be liable. } 7 . Approval would enhance: property valuer in the neighborhood and maintain public confidence in the system. 8 . it was not feasible to fully comply with the c Oldtown Specific Plan because of the limited size of the lot and because tkie lot could not be consolidated with adjacent and ir.1- (i proved properties owned by third persona. L. on August 16 , 19BB , the Planning Commission not at �l 7300 p.n;. , and after l l : 00 p.m. the: matter was hoard before a LJH9j007 ; August 24 , 1988 Pace A aired and divided commission. The minority opinion was that it was unfair to the Applicant for the project to be stopped after a permit had been issued . The principal argument, offered in favor of denial was that one Commissioner pa-rsonall.y O.-Id not like the proposed floor plan , which is a matter of personal taste and outside the scope of the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission. Another Commissioner who apposed the application did not under- stand why the Applicant would want to rehabilitate the structure. The Staff tried to argue that Applicant could build a two (2) story structure; however, it was pointed out that the Code pro- hibits an increase in the number of stories . ►aff also tried to argue that the plan could be redesigned , but the lot .is too small to do so, and it is not feasible to reduce the exis;ti;ig structure as requested, because it is only 1 , 100 square feet. At no time was the 'denial based on a failure to meet the statutory require- ments of Code 5 9652 . The vote to deny was A 2 , and the denial of the application is attached as Tab # 17 . III . THE APPLICA' 1021 FOR A CONDITIOUAL USE PEMIT SHOULD DE GRANTED FOR 'ruE FOLLOWING REASONS: f A. THE APPLICATIOU MET THE EXPRESS CRITERIA OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LODE § 9652 . Said Code section only contains four (4 ) requirements, 1, which are as Alollows : t I . No increase in the number of aturies , and here *here was no change , as the prior structure and the: proposed r structure were both one (1 ) story. ; i 2 . No more than a ten percent ( 101 ) increase in q the size: of the floor area , and her tt there was a slight decrease , and no increase: in size. 3 . Issuance of a building permit, which occurred �� orr May 3 , 1989 . A . Satiofactic;n of pn,y one (1 ) of the following -� three (3) criteria relative to the effect of the project : a . Securing added safety, and the proposed � project met this criteria of effect and there is no contrary finding; p. Reducing fire: hazard , and both the S proposed new wiring and the proposed new roof show that this criteria of effect was also met ; c . Improved aeuthetics that tiring the pro ject 's design into "greatex conformanco with the` currounding L.T119l007 : August 29 , 1988 Page 5 7 , i neighborhood . " Here, Staff admitted that aesthetics would, be improved, and instead of focusing on the " surrounding neighbor- hood,, " Staff limited its focus to the immediately adjacent prop- erties , and the one that was on Joliet has the same front yard set--back as the existing structure. Additionally, Applicant , through slides, established that in the surrounding neighborhood, there were numerous other properties that were also pre--existing and non-conforming uses thatt did riot meet the Oldtown Specific Plan ' s set--back and corner cut-off requirements. Attached at Tab # 18 is a list of comparable properties , photographs of those properties , and a map showing the location of those properties in relation to the site in question . Those documents and photo- graphs clearly establish that the proposed project is in "greater conformance" with the surrounding neighborhood . Applicant also established that the corner cut--off area would be increased at the site , So as to enhance sight distance, resulting in greater conformance with those corners that meet the current. corner cut- off requirements . A photograph showing the: enhdnced sight distance and the stop sigh at the corner in questivi, is attached as Tab #19 . B . EVEN' IF THERE 18 ARGUMENT AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES THE "SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD" AND AS TO WHAT CONSTITUTES "GREATER GONFORBANCE'r, THAT IS BESIDE THE POINT, BECAUSE APPLICANT M:'T TWO 2 OF THE THREE (3 ) ALTERNATE CRITERIA AS TO F,FFECT, AM ONLY NEEDED TO MEET ONE (1) OF THOSE CRITERIA TO QUALIFY FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. As noted above , Applicant clearly met at least. two (2) of the three (3) alternative: criteria as to the effect of the project, and as such , was entitled to the issuance of a condi- tional use permit. 1 C. THERE ARE NO ADD'ITIONAL "IMPLIED" CRITERIA TO ISSUANCE OF A CONDMONAL USE PERMIT, AND NEITHER STAFF NUR THE PLANNING COMMISSION RAS THE POWER ►q ADD UNAUTHORIZED_CRI%ERIA, PARTICULARLY ON A � RETROACTIVE BASIS, ONCE A BUILDING PERMIT HAS BEE14 I ISSUED. I . As noted above , Staff now claizried that it was � the "implied intent" of the City Council to prohibit improvements that prolong a structure' s useful life , and there is no reason- able basis for attempting to create that criteria because, if the Council wanted to do so, it would have done -so when it paused Huntington Beach Cade § 9652 . Since the Council did not do so , then..: is no basis for the Staff to attempt to invent additional criteria not required by the Ordinance , especially on a retro- active basis after the Applicant relied on the issuance of a building permit. } LJH9l007 r .r.�_..r.s.:i )i.}f . _.i.:4)L'•F_"'.alit/iM1s..a4'-J :........,n...='w,..:' .. yts'7C5h4 MwrMw...,rr:jE. .1 r .w,.r. i l.t:.:. ,... _._�_—_ —_. _. August 24 , 1988 Page b ? . It is obvious that the creation of a non- 'existent criteria is an atteript to overcome the fact that , a building permit was isaueu and relied upon, and it is simply unfair to change the rules after the fact. 3 . Moreover, only the Council has the power to amend Huntington Beach Code S 5692 , and neither Staff nor the Planning Commission have the authority to do so by their own fiat . 4 . Moreover, no governmental body car. pans retroactive; legislation , because the U. S. Constitution prohibits ex post facto laws. D. RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES TIDE ISSUANCE OF A CONDIT�� USE PERMIT. 1 . Nere, the prior subject was an eyesore, and if a permit is granted , the site: will bo beautified , which is in the best interests of the. community . Additionally, the Applicant i is willing to build a sidewalk. on both Joliet and Delaware, at Applicant ' s own expense, and dedicate the right of way as a condition of develapatenr , to further beautify the neighborhood . 2 . Here , the owner ' s only recourse is to either obtain a conditional use permit or sue_ the City for a $200 , 000 . 00 loss , an". the taxpayers ' money should not bt wasted when it can be•; saved by issuance of a permit . As such, there is no basis for Staff to argue that !here is "tic deprivation" of a substantial property right. 3 . Mere, the project wil) upgrade the appearance of the neighborhood , and bring greater pride of ownership and enhanced propr_-rty values to thc: area , which is also in the: bs:st interests of the community. 4 Ifere , issuance of a conditional use: permit will re:--affirm public confidence in the integrity of the system, by showing that the Council does not leave owners high and dry � when Staff has a belated and after-the--fact change of mind. E. ISSUANCE: OF A CONDITIONAL USE PER," IT HAS PUBLIC � SUPPORT. f 1 . It is uncontrovert-ed that no citizens opposed the application and the only concern was about the garage wall; and Applicant was willing to remedy that condition. i 2 . Here: , the project has the approval of at least eight citizens , whose letters of support are attached at #20 , and more will be presented. H9/007 a�J �t'� August: 24 , 1908 �;. .. Page 7 i 4 . CONCLUSION: The Council should balance the pros and cons of this situa- tion, and when it does , Applicant respectfully subs is that the considerations of fair play and aesthetic improvements that upgrade the oldtown area, in the ease of pre-existing and non-- conforming uses , are clearly in the public' s best i.iterest , and take a dominant priority ovc : a policy that favors the n&int:e- nance of eyesores , the wasting of taxpayers ' money, and the frustration of the reasonable expk:ctations of our citizens . As such, this Application should be granted. Please give written notice to this office of the date , time and place when this appeal will be heard , and also give the same notice to dark O ' Donnell , the Applicant , at 220 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648. Respectfully submitted, ROGERS 5 I3hRTLEY , A Law Corporation Zo By: ES HARTLE , Attorney for Applicant LJII/jt: Attachments cc; Mayor John Erskine Mayor Pro Ter. Tom Mays Councilman/Councilwoman: Wes Bannister Ruth Finley Peter Green Jack Kelly Grace Winchell Hark O' Donnell - Applicnnt Mary Fern - Owner • LJH9/007 f huntin ton beach department of community dav�elo 9 F pment f'A ff E OR [ ` P 4 TO: Planning ConLmisaion FROM: Community Development DARE: August 16, 1988 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. ©8-31 APPLICANT: Mark F. O' Donnell DATE ACCEPT : P .O. Box 329 August 1, 1988 Hunt. Beach, CA 92648 M�2iGATS�iiX P_HQ S511jG DATE: QWNE Mary Kerr October 1 , 1988 Iz 2407 Service Road Ceres, CA 95307 Oldtown Specific Plan District 1 R-EQULST: To permit exterior alteration to an existing GENERAL PIAU: Medium single family dwnlZing Density Residential that is nonconforming with regard to setbac:-;,, I'N..SE- Single family F parking, and building home separation. ACREAU= 2, 864 sq . ft. (net) ATIOI�l: 503 Joliet (northeast corner of Joliet and Delaware) S Deny Conditional Use Permit. No . 88-31 With findings . 2 : 4 GENERA ,Z 'J ORMATIOII: The subject site is a 54 toot by 55 foot parcel located at the northeast corner of Delaware Street and Joliet Avonue. The existing structure is an approximately 1, 100 square foot single family dwelling constructed in 1920 , that does not conform with the standards of the Oldtown Specific Plan with regard to enclosed parking , building separation , and front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks . The applicant is proposing to substantially alter the interior and exterior of the dwelling, including r6-framing, re•-roofing, electrical and plumbing improvcmonts, changing interior walls , replacement of windows, removal 'of a porch and shed, and stuccoing of the exterior . Section 9652 of the Huntington Beach st 9 g tir < 1.. ,. r'..�,F' ,M)� �k j11i.Y)�r(r...• r2.7? -. •„-:& :rri�rx, n. ti. t / �, +!7r�7+,. ,.�^C;'1^M!,a�, s; Ordinance Codu states that non -conforming structures shall not be enlarged or altered on ­theexterior in any manner unless the Planning Commission permits such alteration subject to approval of a conditional use permit and conformance with the fo loc+ing conditions: (a) That the alteration is necessary to secure added safety or reduce she fire hauard and/or improve the aesthetic appearance of the structure ' s architecture by bringing the design into greater conformance with the surrounding neighborhood. i (2) That the alteration shall not increase the number of *stories . (3) That regardless of any alterations , the floor area shall not exceed more than 10 percent of the floor area the structore contained at the time the structure was classified as non-conforming . ' (4 ) That a set of plans covering the alteration be submitted for approval as to location , design, color, and general architecture , and any work completed shall be in conformance with those plans . The applicant ' s requests to demolish a room of the house (excepting i the foundation) and rebuild constitutes an alteration which falls r under this section, and therefore a conditional use permit is required . 1 S tktb - East Su P-'9_P.e r,tY: GENERAL- PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE: Oldtown Specific Plan-District l LAND USE: Single family residences North of Suhjeat Prop_zta: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential ZONE : Oldtcwn Specific Plan- District 1 LAND USE : Multi-family residential The proposed project is exempt Class 1 Section 15301 and Class 5 Section 15305 from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act . i 5 . CQg,� T�►TI : riot applicable. 6 , Q REp , cIigp1l NX Z.TAW: Not applicable . It=A .3 Staff Report— 8/16l88 . -2- (1087d) , a'.:r,',�r^Cf.�;i _.�F �,aS. _ "','.{� . .'Y'+�a„'t.ik. ..'11+Iie1', - �y1:.b.. , :?°� c.t `• I .• idiHVMrr...: .,r 3C`�t"„`^`�'F.y.3 I .. ; . '.�. .Q ...J512ECJEJ,: PLAN The site is '_ocated within the Oldtown Specific Plan-District 1 . The following is a zoning conformance chart comparing the applicant ' s proposal to Oldtcwn Specific Plan standards: sec t i a n 11!'4aL r ed P14.:�3s1 9130 . 2 Min . Parcel Size 2, 500 sq. ft . 2, 884 sq . ft. Min . Frontage 25 ft . 54 gam . 9130 .:3 Max . Density 1 unit 1 unih Max . FAR 1 : 1 . 39 : 1 9130 .4 Max . DuiLding Height 30 ft. except 11. ft . �single 22 ft. Within story) 25 it , of front and rear property t lines 91210 . 5 Max. Site Coverage 50% 45% ( 11442 sq . ft . ) ( 1 , 298 sq . ft . ) s � 9130 . E Front Setback (Delaware) Dwelling 15 ft . 3 ft. • Garage 22 f t . 28 £t . 9130 . ? Side Setback Interior 5 ft . 1.1. 5 (house) 0 ft . * (garage) Exterior (Joliet) 5 ft . 1 Et . * (house) it 9130 . 8 Fear Setback 7 . 5 ft . 11 £t . (house) 0 F. , * (garage) i' 9130 . 9 Open Space GOb sq . ft . 723 sq. ft. 9130 . 13 (c) Eui lciinq Separation 10 f t . 3 ft . * 9606(b) (3 ) Parking I spaces within 1 space within garage garage, 1 open -1 tandem* : I 9770(e) Corner Cut-Off No structure house encroaches* 25 ft . trinagla over 42 in. high approximately 220 sq. Et . *Existing non--conforming i t (1087d) St-aff , Report -- 8/.16/88 3- r A.Q SUF3MMISAY.0 COMMITTEE: Not applicable. 4....Q ISSIZES AND ANALYSIS : Dian-CQnforMin9..ANRCC. Qf the Sitc Although the subject dwelling is addressed on Joliet Avenue, the site frontage facing Delaware Street is narrower , and therefore considered by Code to be the ,front property line. The structure is set back three feet from the front property line on Delaware Street and one foot from the exterior side property line along Joliet Avenue . The Code requires a 15 foot front setback and a 5 foot exterior side yard setback. " After the required street dedication for the corner radius , the main dwelling will not only encroach into the setbacks , but will also projcct approximately 50 square feet into the public right-of-way and approximately 220 square feet into the required corner cutoff (see Attachment 4 ) . An existing one-car garage is located at zero foot setback along the interior side and rear property lines in lieu of the required 5 feet and 7 . 5 feet , respectively. The one-ca. garage is also non-conforming because a two-car garage is currently required for single family dwellings . Lastly, the garage and dwelling unit are separated by approximately 3 feet , while the Code currently requires a 1.0 foot separation between buildings . � 2ement NistorY I The following is a brief chronology of events concerning this ; application . ,ly ,'�, 9�Q . A building permit was issued by the Department of Community Development for a number of alterations to the existing structure . It was the understanding of the planning staff that the exterior walls of the non-conforming structure would not be impacted, and therefore, the modifications would fall under Code Section 9652 (a) , which permits interior repairs/alterations and re-roofing for health and safety purposes . tlay _4.A_.19 a 8 . A building inspector ' s notice indicated that the - i work undertaken on the site did not match that shown on the plans, and that preliminary work had begun without benefit of building permits . v 5 . 1988 . N stop work order was issued by Land Use Enforcement for possible non-compliance with Code Section � 9651 (b) regarding exterior alterations to a non-conforming structure. The applicant was required to submit revised plans to the plan checker for verificption of setback and property line dimensions . a Staff ]Report 8/2b/88 -A- rX087d) .. 00, M X 25. 128a . A letter was sent from Mike Strange, Senior Planner, to Mark O'Donnell , stating that a . conditional use permit application would treed to be filed 'based on the non-conforming provisions of the Code and the type of work to be undertaken ( i .e. complete reframing of the major room closest to Delaware) . July ,12, 19ag . A letter was sent from Mike Adams , Planning Director, to Mark O' Donnell , again stating the requirement for filing of a conditional use permit and conditional exception. (Staff has since determined that a conditional exception is not required) . y7uly 15 . 1988 . Application for Conditional Use Permit tlo. 88-31 filed. ti - 'Intent _of Non-Cs2aforming Frgvisigns The intent of the non-conforming provisions of the Code is to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by restricting the improvement of non-conforming structures to those modifications necessary for health and safety, and/or to bring the aesthetics of the structora into conformance with the neighborhood . The provisions are intended to allow minor alterations that do not Ij extend the reasonable expected life of the structure , and expressly prohibit such major alterations as increasing the floor area by more ,f than 10 percent, or increasing the number of stories . Within these t limitations, the Planning Commission has discretion over requested exterior alterations . It is staff ' s determination that this proposal does not constitute a £ - minor alteration in conformance with the intent of the Code. It involves re-roofing and substantial demolition and rebuilding of one room (except foundation) , relocation of the kitchen , dining room, living room, bedroom, and bathroom, and new plumbing and electrical wiring . Although the exterior appearance of the dwelling would undoubtedly be improved , the proposal essentially involves replacement of major portions of the structure, thus greatly increasing the expected life of the structure . because of the extreme degree of non-conformity in the setbacks , staff feels that it would not be appropriate to make such alterations without obtaining adequate setbacks . y Adjacent .2va JQmelft Adjacent development consists of single family hosaes and nmall multi--unit developments to the north, west and south, which have been developed to existing Oldtown front setback standards `of 15,:feet. To the east are older single Lamily .homes facing " Joliet., which are set back approximately 6 feet from the front property ' a line . The subject proposal would therefore be inconsistent with } established front setbacks in the vicinity. Staff Report 8116/86 (1087d) . f 'Street Dedication and Corner Cut-Off The Department of Public Works requires that the applicant dedicate a 20 .foot corner radius at the corner of Joliet Avenue and Delaware Street , to be utilized for sidewalks and parkway improvements . There are currently no sidewalks abutting the site . As shown in the attached diagram, the existing structure encroaches approximately 50 square feet into this right-of--way area . The Code also requires that no structures over 42 inches tall can project into a triangular corner cut-off area formed by measuring 25 feet from the intersection of the front and exterior side property lines or their prolongation. This area is intended to provide adequate sight distance from a vehicle stopped at the intersect7ion. The existing structure encroaches approximately 220 square feet into the corner Op cutoff . The applicant ' s requested improvements would extend the life of the structure such that attainment of public improvements and an adequate corner cut-off would be unreasonably delayed . As an alternative , the Planning Commission may wish to consider approval of a modified site plan, which would allow a portion of the existing non-conforrning structure to remain. Those portions of the structure that encroach into the corner cutoff and the public right-of-way should be removed. Additionally, the front yard and exterior side yard setbacks should be made to more closely conform ' with setbacks in the immediate vicinity. It is possible that the building square footage removed in these areas could be located on a � second level, or in the rear of the site if additional open space s were provided via a second floor/roof deck. f i 19 . 0 HECQL4!TEk*;V TIC', : s 4 Staff recorcmtends that the Planning Commission deny Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 with the following findings : i FINDINGS FUJ�_p �. ie: 1 . The proposed structure will not be compatible with ate j acent-. properties because it encroaches within the front yard and exterior side yard netbacks , as well as in the public right-of-way at the corner or Delaware Street and Joliet Avenue . I . 2 . Substantial alteration as proposed will be detrimental to tho general welfare of persons working or residing in the vicinity because the structure will preclude improvements within the j public right-of-way, and will impede sight distance at the corner of Delaware Strer:t and Joliet AvF•nue , 3 . Althouth the property is irregular in configuration, the: size of the lot satisfies the minimum size of 2 , 500 square feet and exceeds the minimum frontage of 30 Feet. Therefore, the cGnditional use permit is not necessary to preserve a substantial property right. Staff Report 8/16/88 -6- (1.097d} t r 40 Encroachment - into the required setback is not compatible with. setbacks: established for properties to the north, south, east - and west and would constitute a special privilege inconsistent Y: with limitations upon those properties . 1 o ALTERNATIVE---ACTIQN 4 The Planning Commission may approve Conditional Use Permit No. 88-31 with reduced room size with findings and conditions of approval . ATTACHMENTS : 1 . Area map 2 . Site plan, floor plans , elevations provided by applicant 3 . Previous and proposed floor plans A . Site plan with adjacent development , curb radius and corner cutoff 5. Building Permit dated May 3 , 1988 6 . Building Inspector notice dated May 4 , 1983 i. Stop Work Order dated May 5, 1988 B. Letters from Planning staff dated May 25 , 1988 , and July 12 , 1988 SH:LP:kla I ' 4 Staff Report 8/16/8 w7�. t lOb7d1 L. e , L.it..,:..1 tr..a_1�L.I 1.J ► , � r f,-.�J�t__.. _^1 t_.._.._ rJ r '`---•- Ott •1 A t A•1 R� $ f t♦ f"'—_� _ _.1•y�.._._: �� .C2 � v ..i ��"'■°'r,'y t R1 Rt ' RI elf wl RI Rt �C4 1 •C 1MLMt�,taw t `'� 1^' . '.. SEA .�J�t. tf•; RI RI Rl Rt RI ,RI wt wt �c R! Ri lw JI •r{ MI • 1 1 � -01 ,� -A• R1 Ni �0 .p .p .fl F-0I l ...w. « r { •,1 .• 1 1 Ri �" SPEC I F(,A E; � � ,v wo:: j RI >h ; at kl -o: PL.Ai�!(C RiCT 7Y�f?} i [ : ( rl...• ,,.. .. ,... . R cl R ,. L_ _ up _ Ito {{ , RI wo—I L L ul" FAI, 111 b-�... a cs � ,C�J U; cRln Rl RI no Rl wr �� !lTv . All rLietN-4f + r C� a At l'ac 4 I✓ c►3 t RI RI JI f I j [i� �_ �. R�C • — �� y �I�rL�} ' '� R]�i,t) • k] tl I� " all t.. �31 f Rl FJ� f Rl ptl R! M U,_ILLPH mil(\}�..\.. �• �x.�fr 7,t: ^' ; y f • � r If I f- 165 AW 4 NUNTINGTON MACH PLANNING DIVISION i i 0 C SAM L Q x do Ci _C1r��t �•MrRst ,. PAD�NrL'�!Nt�Mfl�t i�.�Cr+XSw.1 �P4A C��i•.11�A ��• . �+CsA► �f1lp +�1115 tii+�t.l�CA�#TM1w1%lA'f ��� c&� W O M/�, , aw ff. 1 Lp0 G�1hSy,tJ�1y� iw 11.A ►�•R ^ AAn4a6S. wV►3s•'�}+.�t/�►�ltilsi :,''-I v Rtx� W�+►t. wcf �A i4oc0.~10� t+t/W f►M.i b At�Z1N4 ' uM� yt ►�..ruw,+(. �.p.t GtJi.ri.9-w t ,- .,• � p4iI6 l.. Wbti�lE3 rat 6*160404101.0.. �yal tiA+Z rrW� N I w �..�,• uvt- I to,..�: t7f_.. ,..�, r�� ' , - �a •�t. S.JrmaLi ►9t►a TM 21h'DRAi►! 164" wok. ait,"TPWAl4S }` IfiA ti+AMiaa1i�MK y ► '�ub'ffR bac4oAu+1a 2•la'' y tn1 MV�.TAt.t wr► �*�isttal 52.wh+rt 2 ww uAvAltwIf, Z'h. wewi AK uwO '040* . s OWOAM not% 40%XSM 7. 6AG-b 0, 1 �uu:►ct awiu. Rsi4t�►tt Rs�lnw�ont w+�a/«aC Z•hNtt�RGk1 r1 h%1W.oft ion Tit 1 I 4�� �+ 2'•/••6• yp•.p+ btu+ L•.yr .�I�+ L+.�+ .' s caa�.xt • we ai o Q i ,CuD6R'�' , . •�•` ,i N •'� or tttw.wWA � C�$1NLl� CtiCw H i , ♦N I , 1 .i 1 , RtX�M v 4 I Y Y" • ti . � � . � Ct♦S�♦:iti Ai1�.A I ; v 1 �..•r..r� .+r•e•.r �.rr. iw•...�r n�rr. ram+ ilia ��Llt♦ji. r• .�,..r �rr� 4 , Gu1lb , p�s�x•wMco��. aw.F+�•�ws r�«aro c•�►�s•,es�tn�l� � f tow, obw 4mN aos=t.►�t 1)cuo kw ui..* L Why. sola�nuttlo►� ux.64."&AMWA44 tAn lat" wor"vllm mmsfM +.�t�V94M Ib *mwATfW VUSM t"XmmUt#.%WPM SAK3A4.&A. ReUp W.ls#4i$. . .,{..... } ... .. - •: t .+i 3 r - JU.Is/.{r.<t"t !rlv..::«r• r ., R•�►r+�•"!'• ,y, _ I ED 1 W(.S� LiIV,T'�:fn! '� 1r1L,J i�JN VCS.JW�•:L L'L i J W�•1'p' 1 N 1 �T7� Ej-i1JA'�r.►�. J1jSJ t�y'w+. -3O{,L'"; �r . . is BEN FR...CNT ROOM r PREVJOU� FLOOR PLAN 6E�;RX I �Ze HEN � PRDPO. DEDFLOO � P LC. ..... gy.rw �.e.se;.r�, ,•...t�•T.V .f:'t•• f,. .TIi ` ! •` _'•y.. � ` .e ( , e �w 7 1 � ' ANAGElf T 'SET c.A SYQXITURE OC A M M M N ti w rww��w�r rY i 15` Y ,: r , r f i �. %i` •�rt�'��T r� t , +�I.R 1•7M�'�. t'�1'�r,l �aW }M•�Y .1 1•'1' ` t w 1+ Yrl r ,:Lr a l�r� ..t -• �' as .,�' ,`'. '"� i tu Ln Lij ` I a•� � 1 , iCtt�' a; ,;• 5 �4 yet ry efs� ) � ; • + � J e t 1,' �y r, 1 i 4 tjwK�;'•y r tiz=xqt �►sr�--�t�S � ,�u+��C', �i t i<� .ti j � LJ �'_y r .ram a a T CS . , �ZN7 r at'•S t W e cif :� ) 1 f� 1 �.,aC:. �`t �,r},.. rr ♦t ys, ''t t>♦f N ; J it t * c } 1 r _ � r i., J t v tt ° ft?:o{� � ..�� �!� ✓r X � y�> �°�' a 1 rY ''... a is, -i� f Y�1+�e' �r� ,/l t^.*.Y '7 J}f � 7: }f�R',� � ti4 ,t S T ✓ S i r � � ' f r i •:`.a,�;�t.� f ySY. <S L*�� i Y` e i � ?•✓ t. y. ,, k 1�1. �:�. •raw '4 '���Y y�.aS,},� �►'�i���-1.°Q� i i'!�i Y�� {h,yuu die 7 'K a e..''.,1�1 f1 rr! �• f t�v t. 5 7�NS Z••41 .fit H�S , -}S SST l�AL1i ----wpm owwaftw PUF ; .r. �..«. CT) wrc)ff PO 0 RADI trs JOLIETAVM. PREP � !•�t��y �'y.. VGL/ti�•�f 1v� �r a? CA 'Paralt numbers O00 151>1 rc�- -- - - kIdA Address._ 503 JOLILT- Traci WA Lot && black'&& "EXIST. bLOG. Building Use i 5FD . it, •Owner Contractor MARS KLAR (RO CublitACtOk) 2190T L EMCf Cf.RfS CA ..L ; Architect or Engineer • a . r'•-------------------------------------------------------------------- CQroectat REtelhE 7900T bA t k00F,REMOVE 2 N0R-bEAklhG LALLS,ADD 1 : ,�••, , �J ALL VOA nOYE 1 b0hhe D001t, DthO 510SAGE i PORCH 1�'•t:i Publlc butioing : NC •r +�;• 3a.Fts Living, No.Storiss 1 valuation 20000 Garage ko.rsaillss - 1 Pu114.COC! ` Das-ripts • • v '• f Occ Grp% k! Constr.Typt VN 000.1.osd .. Coasue Coca 43% DICE.Usage .01'L Parking Soo. PIOUDI at Actions -----------------------------------P-_ t- -- --MO ------ - ------- • �---- - �y 05/03Jbe Lencus• ►M 05:r31b8 Auto. GH 05l03ieb ADDi.Datt ;t`l:i} �y.s PC PC Receipt I Issued ---GhC---OSlO3/t:y----Iseaf Rfceipt-i----731a7�------------------- ---- � y,, s ------------------,------- ---------------------------- --- I03PECT:ON FEES ' Description AelounL Dovartptlon Aaauat ''• ' ---- fee 1611.6u---- --- ----------- ------ In '•�;• r 'ZZ lraoea+Ss;; Ir.00 r:encnas: L1aNry O.eo f Conserv.tian 1.1C •� i•; . ,_ Micro Ctpy tee T.CG Penalty G.La total yet 246.;9 .. f .4.-f.�♦♦-.MYf.-.>W-...n- ••••�r.•f.-.w��..r ti 4•~r♦Nrr%a.to a•ta•ti..on.t• i M. },1 >f a.-..... r M..rr C-.- r. r. racy - y� - - f a..•a•a.M>�.•.r..►... .wr+-r.«.••.w..-.►w► r+ r +•s..R tr ••>.s♦1 r..M M-♦. �► aw..w •-. r•r - �.'. .w.r-raw. -♦r•.•......1..•�1♦+>att►�[♦ .•.w• •.• .-w•r w...r r r� r.r •-�•...nr.o.tl aw � A1.•w.-�..-.r�..r.►...�._...�� 1+.....r r rr fwar/.� 1+.-I.I ar.•ter•a.f M.rw r.�. - C i.rr.w•+s....r n. .. a •r,.t ...•. ewf.-.r'•...•.".•�, J _. - �4w�.....•��.�+...a--•�r--w•r~ .ram i >-i.rp.► ww •wr.1 a•. r •as•1 ararr M.o~s♦.>.a f •..rr.✓...-..r�-..-r.r rwlaar7• _ t.. ...r.+.-�.--��..,....._�.. 4]►r rr r r--..•r-�wr.w r>.--.r wi.......w••rA.�s • - w wti•r s.••.•e.•...Ao..s.a.Y r M•(�Ia••1/rrr�•.♦ iar'a-a♦wa.aW..-.) ar,.r..r.. C... r.. l-w..-• t�..r c.- w r .r.. r ♦ �+•r _ r..••b--• a+.- i+..-.�+�..t.r r.r r.w.w..f'ar+�..a - p.: �!r•r.r rs7•O r,cocoa♦4 i•-�•r w w.-r�..*..a-.r. .•.•..... -...04 M-.0 w. oo w r ♦—ftf v ~M• >rwr ar .w.-•..-.••-•.r.►r ..r,.w�.+ . ,n..0 -. ... It ..-......a..-a•ar.w.1 a ..•>r-.f ar• t••09 M r••r••rrr w r-.w.r-ti-..•r.•tow--+r.w ^-'.'-. w.....w o—or-M rr a.M-M 4-0 w arc.*F s•' Anil _ ... ♦.Lw .�,..�.I M�•�•..r•,.aM•,O-.waK.A•a-...>a...r-.+r r.rr.i (.' = . 4.r.w.►♦.w-.. A w....r- w.... ,>.. ••.q..•...r•✓...,•.....4.- 1...Gwers:••••..►a•r .•s•.r.a.•.r. fr•.•-r.-.w.•+ w�r 4..> >.r ..r bww n-. .N MY r do..r .. F...4 ...►.- . .ws or•.• N,a,. • - - 'r.•P.�•fr•.-..•.ww•+y.w•wr.• .r•..♦ r a+a-.r•••...> ...�a..IN a-r..w-w r-r V; r -, . .. .-oi��OwwrL+ts.o.c►..r!... t•t...w.wr w •a taco w tow w.wr>.. rc.. � a s+.•rr+s 4*--••..++.w+r...+ +-- Mkft d6 ft At e,..afro.owW .. 4 "•.•.,r a a N v.>M Dow•^--- ccwMac+Pawc-aNfKT M _ - .. 1•a•>arise. •-cos .� r wr t.♦.•a•a-s 1'1.•,a>,f.C-bL .. ..�`�'. •+ - - 1 w•. r.i 1�ai..wr K""oomo.ar r..%a -.rr.r..r• '(�-Iw♦.wp 4rtw 0--vawr+..rr.wr..a.--•"% • .s-a sA'1+.lotVa1: . _ ...�+r A� r.7- .t Arr►t •aa4 LM•a- tNl esaw .,> ! a...r a--w vwrrw wh"t mn-tr4KCTOR swc-Cri-v CeviTY,Guin Copy.OFFKEsGAff N COPY-A PPUCANT a j'. r� CI 'O .. TY F HUNTINGTON BEACH �. DEPARTMENT Oi 7 • OEVELo►mENTSEAv1cES INSPECTION REPCIi'T ' CORRECTION NOTICE ffBuiiding O Electrical O Plumbing / PERNIT NO. JOB AGGRESS _ wrr�'_" r � J- �✓—�� '� � •fir �f..rwa�1 G. :�c' `Sri+--.r.�► ���,^W7f.�'`�✓�,f - 'i i f i i 11 there are 9jestront on the above y.....�. please call mo at } betwten and _ wry . •.-.! •• Iw r'• • ••''IINV _.i•• i f �_ ww+v. P.-• I Os•. ., F �+ 1.M fir` 1�,•�.:�� taw �. • .� i. MCA ♦ y _• �yESTIGATION ' REPQ RT �l RMENT or .• , r .� ^rCAILIFORMIA .ti • .. ., ;-glob'Address;. r- k. No. Lot No. � ._ ?act No• 81 ' Owner y %�r' r►t Irrir•••••�I Y�_w••.• -• ..b - .. • � Owner's • . ' , . - Address y Description •;_. • _ a " of Work _ �,,L rut Approx. Size w ."� ---- Approx. Valuation PERIWHS REQUIRED Building CJ Electrical ❑ Plumbing13 40 "❑ a ` INSTRUCTIONS It (will) Jwii6wx*) be necessary to STOP WORK r'r 0 immediately an,i to obtain .he necessarryy permits. re Provide two copies of O Plot Plan, (2) Floor Plan, I -- (,D ` (3) Structural details, (4) Elmitions, (5) Other Infor• _ lv mation as required. . T Q� Special Instructioru ` P It. 50 HIM, .�NC?�' - 1 certify that one copy (ryas) (vas not) left at the i above address - T lnspector' �,, .a�"` ,• . Signaturo RwflMs Ala.1 fnsp+etw .M`•2 OMles Cry Nr.3 Qhresar .i :I :1... _. .. ... w>jr�•1......-. M:.w.•r.a.►•AL•a.�w..�wr..twy...►.wr.��+...r�Aw..A lti../ I PA* �C I �1F,, of [unt�nReath r � toy► ... M00 MAiy 3719EE'T -�, CALIFORNIA On" DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DE - VELt3WiNT f uildin 0146;6n 536-5241 Housinj/A�Ser�iopm�nt Oiridon 538.55IZ .• ;. ' Planning Division 636.SZ71 May 25, 1983 .hfa' r�'d'Donnell 220 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92.648 SUBJECT: 503 .IOLIET, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA Dear`Mark: The stile lan foi 303 .1oli: . pfia P et::$as been reviewed by staff for.zoning com nce, and based on Section 9652(c) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, it has been dictermined that a conditional use permit and conditional exception applications are required far this ~� p •o;ect. In addition, a chain of title is necessary to deternine''the'date or creation for the eYistIng lot. 1 recommend that the chain of the title be submitted Efts. so that we may determine if the lot was legally created. I-have enclosed copies of the application for your convenience. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at 536--5271. Sincerely, Mike Strange Senior Planner NIS:gbm �1 i 1� . t CA 03'62d-3 ��. t f ity, u""titi h4 to-h lea,c 20M MAIN 17REET. � �,� a . • CAIIfQRN1AlnA8 ' • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEIOF%IENT F3uiMirp�Di,rf�ian 536-52;1 . Housing/Redivelopmont Division 536.5542 Planning Division $36.5271 -Ju' Iy 12, 1998 r , Mark . O'Donnell ` Pierside,,Business Services �r Post Office Box 329 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 SUBJECT: 503 JOLIET STREET i Dear kIr. O'Donnell: This letter is in response to your correspondence dated June 2$, 1988 and your nusmemps telephone inquiries concerning 503 Joliet Street. As stated In past meetings and conversations, in order to;proceed on your project you must file for a Cond.tional Use P P j 'Permit. The necessity of this application Is due to the extensiveness of rehalilitaclon work being conducted on a non--conforming structure. Your building presently, encroaches into the front yard setback area and there;ore will also require a Conditional Exception. Upon submittal of the necessary a 1lcations (Condhionat use Permit & Conditional Exception) a staff member will be assigned as the project planner for your project. 'If 1n , fiiin'g your application you should.have questions that: cannot be answered by the planner working at the counter at that time, a meeting should be, scheduled with the Counter Supervisor, Susan Pierce. Questions that cannot be answered by the Courtier Supervisor will be directed to Scott Hess or myself. Staff recommendation on your project will not be rendered until such time as the City`has adequate access to all facts related to t.he'project. Once staff has;researched the project, a staff report will be submitted,to the.Planning'Cammisslon for public hearing. Typically, there is a 4-6 week time period from the date of filing to the public hearing. We hope'this letter has thoroughly addressed the process which must be followed in order i to corry)lete your project. Should you have further questions regarding this (natter, please do not hesitate to contact Susan Pierce of my staff at (714) 536-5271. Sincf realy. hilke ams, Pla using Director cc Susan Plerce, Associate Planner Mike Strange, land Use Techniclan .,Q' 2d)4 1 • 9652 ti ' use.,o955yAert istcu ue or Tirat ano an or re a rs may. , a male which , do not ..e; ar . . � Interior . ` ge !'the square ' footage�or; -increase the h g a niA onfo'zming structure , - Rexoofirig for health aedsafetypurposes may also be permitted , under this 'sub- section . (b ) Nonconforming structures shall not be enlarged or altered on the exterior in any manner unless ; .( 1 ) the provisions contained in subsection (c ) apply,- 'or (2 )., all . as- pects of the existing structure and the proposed addition are , made to conform to applicable provisions of Division 9; or ( 3 ) the planning commission permits such , a1teration .subject to approval of a conditional use permit and conformance with the following Conditions ; ( 1 ) That , in the opinion of the commins`ion, the alteration is jiecessary to secure added safety or re- duce the fire hazard and/or to improve the aesthetic appearance of the structure ' s architecture by oringinq. tha Aesign into greater conformance with the surrounding _ neighborhood . (2 ) That the alteration or addition shall not increase the number of stories . ( 3 ) That regardless of any or all alterations , enlargements, or additions , the floor area shall not exceed more than ten ( 10t ) percent of the floor area the structure contained at the time the structure was classified as nonconforming. ( 4 ) That a set of plans covering the proposed construction, alteration, or addition shall be sub I` mitted to the commission for approval as to location , design , color , and general architecture; and, any work so represented shall be completed in accordance With the approved plan; and rJa permit for such work shall be issued until the plan has been approved . ( c ) Subject to use permit approval by the board of zoning adjustments, existing structures which are noncon- forming only because of setback requirements may be altered or enlarged provided that the alteration or enlargement is in conformance with applicable provisions of Division 9 . Addition' s determined by the director to be minor in nature may be constructed at the existing yard setbacks if such I 7f 87 /'ffgY•/'/•f/+od1''Y3T'�t/1i`tl..ffn,`.fYiJI a.11vn� +w.w�. —� -r--;eS.Ta;.r�>t,h >t:. .r3.�i+..,e.Veti...,M+Mw:ialit Y>,•C..+..7 _ ,, .. { '9653 f setbacks were legally. established, (Ord. ; 2879, '16 Dec 86Y. i � 9653 Exception. SpeeiFlc provisions of th is''.i:article,' shal1, not appl 1f separately addressed in ``an adopted specific plan . . (Ord . :2 79, 16 Dec 86 )` i1 ' (Prior .:law: Ord . 495, 6/46`; Ord. 1105 , 1/65 ; Ord . 1743, 2/72; Ord . 19450 12/74) I. h i (t SJ 4, Or r August III L988 Mike'.Adams _ Plrxnning I Commis s ion Huntington Bench, Cal, Condit:ionaL, Use Permit No. 88 '31 {� t Dear Sir : 4 My initial ne•.�at�.ve reaction to the application is , that it is de wious . No mention is made of the s truct:ure facf otng pelaware which ;was a store from a�iout 1920 �o .1963 and - used" for. i►torage since* This s truc turd was never used for residential puz•pases . At one time there Were gas pumps in front with the tanks still' under the sidewalk area. ' A� future unsuspecting purchaser would soon find that the store was torn down to the rotting sub floor which at places is below grade level, existing floor 'joists were used with zero clearance from grade;,no 'provision: for ventilation and a 4X8 hip beam with no support, at: the upper end which will allow the whole roof to sag. I Sincerelyours , I i it •• •w J • • •••• ' i NA _il 0, il.j F11 3 . ingzeaa,`and ogre' t01,the slit® has t potentiail ofcreating ` -additional traffic. mpecta t&, th me 4 • rsection `of - ►dams •'Avenue t . , . Ufid iinpacta and commerc al,;ce�ropoendrannch cause * o 'tx generated b- the hour fashion shows, 7 . The s. ' '�: . �". ".;j.., ,,•. ..�• :, •, ;', ,.: ';: .�;` .•_: ; � t`�,':., ., proposed` daricin ve tertainment, use does not 'conform with the Huintin4t Beach, 0 inance.,Code in : ofterms buffer area, s; • the rest ant building s`; approzimately 180 feet from residential es ' to the north { ross AdamsAveriue) . 5 . ,The pro sed dancing/1 !we entertain nt use is , not compatible . with a existing 24-hotu.r market wi t ' n the center. C-5N1?IIONAT! USE PERMITQ, 31 APPLICANT: MARK F. O'DONNELL Conditional Use Permit No. 88-31 is a request to permit exterior alteration to an ex* sting single family dwelling that is nonconforming with regard to setbacks, parking and building separation. ENV IEQ dTAL_ STATUS • Thp .Secti PrnP 1•sed project is exempt Class 1 Section 15301 aad Clan$ 5 0 5305 from the provisions of the California Erwironmental Quality Act . t SPECIFIC PLAN: l te, is located within the Oldtown Specific Plan-District 1. The following is a zoning conformance chart comparing the applicant' s proposal to Oldtown Specific Plan standards : EE RECQ=ND TION Deny Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 with findings and conditions. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED Les Hartley, attorney representing the applicant , spoke in support of ;,the request. He said that the applicant 's request meets the requirements under the old zoning coda for a conditional use permit and that stopping the work has created an eyesore in the neighborhood. Mark O'Donnell , applicant, spoke in support of the request He said the improvements to the residence would enhance the lot even, though it still would be a small cottage . He further stated that there is I� a lot of diverse architecture in the neighborhood. Tom Van Tuyl , Pier Realty Group, spoke In support of the request . E, �I PC Minutes - _8/16/88 -12- (1L70d) �t tat 'Waft. (~' , Mahood r .213, Portland, o 'the '' �gtreat- Dennis t sspoke 3n ,support .--Hr--= aaid :..the:;jproperty� is "an eyesore and the addition is a big Improvement Charlie Unger; 8442 Springhurst, "reported' his conc"erns' with the Char . �. rrouert arid `isontthe9verge fLt� the,:gubject �property,'�ad�oi�ns him . , quest . garage be 'rebuilt w A o falling , down. He rgglu ed the proper Y ithin the proper setback requireirants. , Natalie Kotsch, 220 Main Street , spoke in support of the request . re.1uesteandnthethublperhon present clan . -.. The peak for or against the „ 4 p hearing . was ed: A:;MOTION WAS MADE` BY , SILVA AND SECOND BY, KIRKLAND, TO,"APPROVE CONDITIO�AL . USE PERMIT NO. 88--31 WITH ALTERNATE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: -Commissioner Higgins expressed , concern, with quality,'of the con'struction ;of the remodel and suggested that the ,entire structure, He Eur'ther repa'irskinstead the P applicants misrepresentation p instead of a. 'major , remodel . Commissioner Leipzig stated he would not support the motion -,as he felt the remodel would not enhance the property or neighborhood . AYES: Silva, Kirkland NOES : , Livengood, Leipzig , Ortega, Higgins ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None A',MOTION-..WAS MADE BY ,LIVENGOOD 'AND SECOND.'BY ';HIGGINS :TO DENY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 88-31 WITH FINDINGS, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Leipzig , Ortega, Higgins NOES: Silva, Kirkland ABSENT: Slates ABSTAIN: None E U11M _FQR DENTAL: 1 . The Proposed structure wL.l not be compatible with adja:;ent properties because it encroachea within the front yarrd and exterior side yard setbacks,. as cell as in the ptiblic right-of-way at the corner or Delaware Street and Joliet .Avenue. PC Minutes -- 6/16/88 13- (1170d) 2e Substantial alteration'. as proposeDA d sill tibe.,;detrimenC'al ,`.to .the; bacau`se the�structureritill wrecl`udeoimrrovamen" -in' the vicinity gene, p ,�:9 ;, . .. p, p ks : within -the ., public right-of-way, : and will :'impede sight_ distance at the corner, of Delaware Street and' Joliet Avenue. 3 Although the property-, is irie4iilar in ctinfigutation, the size lot satisfies the minimum `size ,ae 2, 500. square -feet and exceeds the minimum,:Erontage of 30 feet. Therefore, the 'conditional use permit is not necessary to preserve a substantial property right._ 4 . Encroa'chment into the required setback is ndt : compatible cks established for a north, south, east,. properties to th and west and would canst3.tute a special priv;.]ege inconsistent with limitations upon those properties . C-6 AMENDMENT NO, 88-8 APPL ANT: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH or A."request Ito end Section 9101 of: the Nuntin on Beach. Ordinance Code,,.t'o .allow:, ecific temporary uses withi the Residential i Agriculture. (RA district subject: to condi oval use" permit, and to emend Saction 951 . 15. 1 to allow temgora recreational vehicle ,storages'within the Restricted Manufact ing District (MI-A) subject to conditional use ermit . ENVIRQNMEML STATU,a: The proposed. code amendm nt is 9�tegorically. exempt from the provisions of the Califor is E 4ironmental Quality Act . STAFF RECQNfiSE�p,,�,'I'IQN Approve Code Amendment No 88 8 and recommend adoption by the City Council . THE PUBLIC HEARING WA OPENED There was no one p sent to spear r or against the request and the public hearing wa closed . A MOTION WAS MA BY LEIPZIG AND .SECO BY KIRKLAND TO APPROVE CODE AMENDMENT NO. -8 AND RECOMMEND ADOPTI 1 BY THE CITY COUNCIL, BY THE FOLLOWING OTE: � AYES: vengood, Silva, Leipzig, Ortega Higgins, Kirkland NOES: one ABSENT: Slates ABSTAYH s. flone PC Minutes •. 8/6/8B -14- (.117Od) ♦�� 'fix' .. `�� • �S—D �-- heW • wall l ' NOS . 1 be •� �. ' ► I� d w..---;� -fit ext. 11 '��r�StG�t1 64 , �j(M 1�i 1� f -, �a� �.,tiw�.µw.w�... ,. ;,;. � '3. � r ,^4.-RNt-.,,-r. .N•......�.,�.n: —. _ .. i.rr.♦n.,.�,r•...a„n,• � ,,�� .� � ! t r.�wr....•r+•w...r.r+r•w..rw..�.rw��' r "Y�" ,,�,/+ r��L� + . � . 4.4 . �0 el nwx •�- 3 ,jG,f�tn r,/f� uirr t/l,� .. �� ,��� � ±Y`Y1 Y'1 Rti�Y1� 1� , ��1� Lb• •��t.�7�C2.1 ,. { �13 l VkA i�A(Z PLAY)N TO E-G P�!C\A\-LV Uc- Loae�;a4-) 00"C- 5?, TWS -p�Ao� Xb "t'tA�. ca n ? �- a' onn�� t� lea t 1.,L V F*%v %�LAn A rN 0 01 C04ni>,M TO -tAAZ neklyeoavkao IT kz- h ol,, ;' To Hungnpton Beach Rezidt iLi and Property Owners: ' t IL9"a - • arxi fPtropertykoianer in',"this of HuntngtcarV tleaclj, it tMw5 :W3.t-,h �reaL• ;pleasure thit."I Witaneesed ttie` 'of the old house on the, Hoxth Est canner"of Joliet ani3-:EzxFlsnapr� not; to far, film whea'e we are right now.,: M�► ldel3r s were, "''fhda fs ,garea1. lit'ially this home Will get the ds facelif t it 'nee . What a benefit to ail of t� . ;live nearby." - ! °• frYr ,4�Sf��., ti ,.•`{ i"r 'i � 14 r1 Perl� eed that ti+ciric t► stop in' fri:ati 4 st�-ige ants that r ;Yo u have noti ped tiiork has been .done in. three moi�t3as, be+t~auee the" t;ity, of Bunt' -Beach has sto � some rea--m= which I will angtan piled this project 'late, relate to, you. Please consider what the implications are. Y f •' Reasan #1: B � Off, t0 th@ WD, f;, " Y , 5, the old sidfr�g atuoco a, change that eras shown on the blueprint and application , for.'pe nntt •� the o�er hast`ooma into'-conflict xith'atn ordit«2t m (section 9652 (b) (a)%H This `particul eir section deals 'exclusively with older: hcwes that do not- met -cc.�tain setback requiremwts ,that: i&m chat ged AFMM :the home teas built. Would you pr-fer that older howl be- made more attractive? , N Rea. 42: Cit Y also reels that the home is being r e odeledAnexcess. About`$25;000 ls'..to6 soetit and tt it. Is a acre:.fr"actic4-i -"of the older homer,home." out into this rcalesCate OUP. Yam'. If ou ` 1oin8 i to .bu a ., ,, what would yt..r want to do? Do' you reel that p�op1P Should.be able to r=del. t..hoi�r huts?' Personally, " k'e the blend �`t>�tx3 ,1 l . or &trerent hems,-dean here and prerer• Iluntingten OldTc4a Tbwnlot area to the tracts. .Y should t lno mention ,that SCfS1$ tt13 I�1�E33 �216�". t` 33�0 ary attr 6t�v6 in addition to t� , , , NO ADDITIONAL S+ ?JAR£. FOOTAGE,' NO ADDITIONAL UM, NO ADDZTIotdAs. ShOHIES, NO ,AD ITIONAL BED11,00 S are being'_add.ed. Only a Y model THIS PROPERTY, THIS HOW IS ON THE SAME I:'Y)MATION' TNAT IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, tP, need your help, the Pi.ANNI'NG UV1ff&'"IGri DEARIM IS'ON AUGUST 16, 1988 a* ITY the C C"CM CIIA BM at ?PM. FI.F.A,.aE COW and PLEASE SYGH OUR PETITION. , Speci ric2illy, to ask your support for the completi6h `of this remodeling which makf s our neighborhood morn wt tractive and'provide a better hodtee for a local faoaly. I, the undersigned, support, tlxi completion of the remodeling of the homn at'503 Joliet., Huntington Beach, CA. z V I ram .� . j. Pac f ica . t' you ' OFDo� 1 _Y Y I Donna Kimball S 13600 Main Stierit Suite 140 Ht;ntinoion Beach.i;;kl tcrn)a 02648 E (714) $41.6133 =i To HuntkWtan A3each lResidents and P%erty Owners: As' a resi.deint and',property owner in.this`part 'of, Huntington Beach, it � with ®teat' pleasure tt�a►t I witnessed the r�modelisig of the old house on_the Ner•th- Po - East corner�ot" lolie;t and:.Indiana li' not to afar. fra.n Where we are righ now. fee 46r a "This is,: t "fiiA1i ;'::alai hose K311 t the lftags. faceiift it needs. What a benefit all of use who live nearby" Perhaps you have noticed that Work'was stopped in the stage and that axe s�ork has been done in three month. This` a because the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this pra3ect for some rea9ons which Y will relate to you. Please consider What the implications are. Reason 11: By taking off siding to' pre the old , . pare the�building for , stucco (a change that was shown on the blueprints and application for,"permit), the owner has come ant;o conflict with ari ordinance (ee:tion 9652 (b) (c) > . This particular section deals exclusively with older homes that do not mat certain set-back requirements that were changed AFM the home was built. Would you prefer that older homes b© made more attractive' Reason 02: The City also feels that the howis being rewdeled In excesses About $25,000 is being spent and that: is a mere fraction or the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate mwicet to buy a nest.:lore, whir would you want to do? Do you feel that People should be able to remodel t.'wir homes? Per aaiall y, I Me the blend of different hows down here and prefer Huntington Beach's OldTown/Townlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to making the hone cleaner, , gaffs, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FWrAGE, NO ADDITIONAL UNIT, 140 ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO.ADDITIOWL BEDR00MS are being added. Only,a rewdel. THIS PROPWN, THIS FEW IS ON 111E -UM FOUfi7i ATION T}LAT -► IT HAS' BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. Sol we need your help, the PLANNING 0Mt=%1ON 1TAR1W IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY CDUNCIL CHAME M at 7PM. PLZkEOX COW and PLEASE SIGN UUR PETITION. Specifically, �we .ask your support for the completion of this remodeling %tdch rakes our neighborhood nare3 attractive and provide a batter .home for a local family. iO I, the undersigned, support the completion of the remodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. � name address Rer 4 cTtYL Thank you, t'tark O'Dof=11 ,r. To 1111,i6tingttm Beach Residents :and Property Owners L grit and ro of Elunt Beach, it way With As a t'e:rfd per•ty.,owner,-irt this a part �P,'�..: great• pleasure trat I Witnessed`-,the;;remodeling or.'. the old..IxA se on 'the kicth- Ei�t My fee. oliet and Indianapolis, not: to fair from 4i6ee,,►�e arm right �t ._corner. o! J liiw were, "This is great, finally tr- home will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit, to all of'u3 who,live nearby. " -. ps.Y top . ,. Perfia have noticed t1�t. work . s ped'in' tha lra�ing stage :�r�1 that no . City.-or , in: three months This is because 'the Huntaington Beach has stopped this project for some rea:�ona which I will relate to you. Please comider what the implications are. Reason #1 By taking off the old siding' to prepare the building for stucco (a change that was shown on the blueprints and application for 'permit) , the owner has come into contliat with an ordinance: (section 9652 (b) (0 ) . This ticular section y deals eelusiyely with older homes that do not met certain set-back requirements that were changed AFTER the bogie wag built. Would you prefer that older b=s be made more attractive? Reason #2: The City also feels that the home is being remodeled in excess. About 325,000 is being spent and that: is a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older hose or going out into this real estate io ket to buy a new,;home, what would you rant to do? Do you feel that people should :be able to remodel their homes? Personally, I like the blend of different hows down here and purer Huntington Deach's O1dTownlTownlot area to, the tracta. I should also mention that in addition to mik the'.how cleaner, safe, and attractive, No ADDITIONAL .SQUARE F Or)TAGE, NO ADDMO U UNIT, NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO;ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS are being added. Only a remiodel. _THZS PROPERTY, 71IIS tDC IS CN THE SJI,i£ F1Q IDATION 711AT IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the PLANNEW COKIIS ION ItPhRM IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY COtINM CIS at TPM. P rE COAL wid P[.P.M SIGN (XIR PETITION. Specifically, we ask your support for the completion of this remodeling which sakes our neighborhoed more attractive and provider a better home for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion or the remodeling of the ,,r-hoaae-at 503Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. a Thankou bark O'D-w)elJ. Y � , t t 7r= I d' l � 1 j To Wntington Beach Residents and Property Owners: :Aa: a re ident and Prbpex ti owner in this pant 'Of. l mtin ton Beach, it Vws"with Feat pleaswre that I K3� he or,,the old house on the North East`corner of;Joliet and',wIndianapolis, .not to far from where we are right nw+ '' my, f6iiin6s"were. ."Thws� is'great I fiho i y this' hone will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to"all or us 4w live nearby." , Perhat PPe"d i�r the framing atag�a errd th��t ps,you have noticed that work sto no Work has been done i i three months. This iz because the City of Huntington"Beach:`has stopped this prof ject' for scmw reasons which I wiU relate to you. Please consider k't1a,t the IMLications are. Poe&% n t 1 ; off ,t;he old si to re the. +build for tucco (a change that was shown 'on the blueP rims and 'application for permit) , „the owner has come intoccantl3et wi.th'aai ordinance (section 9652 (b) (off) . This p$rtictdw •section deals exclusively with olde that do not set �rtaln set-back requirnts that were chazised AFIEtt' the home iras built. Mould you prefer that older haws be made mom attractive i Reason #2: The, City also feels that the home is being. remodeled• in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere,fracxtion.'or the t Wa of a new hone. p If you had the option of fixing u yews- older home or going out into UU3 real estate market Lo tUy a new,,name, what would you want to dos Do you foal that 'people stuould be able to r esiode' l their hones? Persmally,' I 'like the blend of 'different. homes down here and prefer Huntington DcachIs OldTownlTownlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition � the l safe, nd attractive,. NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE. ph�, VOADBT4N� , NO ADDITIONAL CRIES, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS are being added. Only a remodel. THIS PROPERTY, 'lHLS tM IS ON MIE SAME FOUNDATION TIMT IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the PLANKING 00Irlr0=DN 1 EARM IS ON AMUSC; 16, 1986 at the CITY' COUNCIL CHAMI3L•'RS at 7PM. PLEASE COM and PLEASE SIGN OUR PEr1'I 00. specificany, we ask your support for the completion of this remodeling which makes our neighborhood morn. attractive and provide a better h+owe for a local. Family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the remodeling odeling or the horse at 503 Joliet, Huntington D&ach, CA. !/ a I � tbw* `you, Nark O'Daruiel.l i To 4iunti ragton Beach IteAdenta and Property Owners property.,�e ,,, As ,a resident and r+o r in'. this of, Hunt c_ h�.:it �� Frith gm . p re that. I- witri.% d- the�r�ea deii4g 6f the old house on-the:North- East corner of Joliet!and_,Irxiiii i.s, not'to far;from where am right ; now. feelings wWr: "This is" t ` finali this• home.will t the 4; facelift it needs. What a henefit to all of ups who,,Live nearby." ha work was,.s ,a. in the `f. -s ;• and" tha t� P�et^haps you have noticed t tpod taming • no Work has been dcane in three:months. This is b+eeause:the City of Huntington Beach Yu�g ug stripped `tI� ,proje�et for; some rea9onm which I will , .. .. relate to you. Please consider what the i*.Ucations are. Reason 11 By taking of F; the old sidii� to prepare .the ,tiu3lding`for; stiueca to ` that was shoaa on the blueprints and application Yor'p(.rmit) , Ue owner 'has come into-confliot,,wi:th an ordin-ince (section 9652 (b) (c) ) , This particular section deals Exclusively with older homes that do not met`cex•tiirr set--buck requirements that were-changed AFTER the :h<me wag built. Would you prefer that older homes be made mode attractive? Reasm 12: The City also fee1.9 ' that the home is WINS r{emode' lcd i.n excess. Ab6ucosttoP2a�n�'home�iIP Sou Thad the o�tticm of of;�-friicufan� the Y p ixin$ P y olden home or going out into this real estate market to•buy a neW homa, what would you want: to do? Do;you', foal that, people should 7`be able to remodel their )xxr q? Pers oiially, I like 'the blend of different home's•dean here an on Bea d prefer ! ntingtch's O1dTowin/Townlot area to the tract9. I should also .mentioh:that In addition, to the.NO ADDITIONAi ��AOeoae�clearier, :oafs,� and attractive; DDITIONAL UNIT, NIO ADDITIONAL. Srt�RIES, FAO ADDITIOUL BEDROOMS are being added. Only a remodel. TLETS PROPERTY, THIS HOW IS ON THE SAME FYJIMATION TNA1' 4 TT HAS BEEN ON FDR OVER 50 YEARS. 4 t So, we need your help, the PL.AMIHG C0FH SIGN HE:AAM. . ' P, 7S"(?N AUrGUST; -lE, 1988 at. the, CITY MUNCIL CHAME�M at 7PH. PLEASE COW and PLEASE ON, On LOUTSON. Specifically, we ask your support for the ca'glletion of this remodeling which makes our neigbbor hood more attractive acid provide a bitter k home for a loral family. I, the undersigned, 'support the completion of the remodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA• ; .1 << _r , niim address - i 'nank yogi, Mark 0'Uo ne1l 4 S August 29" 1988 •:.,,y Huntington Beach Tlann-In Co=City of Huntin t g fission _ Vr P.o.1 .BoX ,190 Huntington Beach',' California 92648 "Location: 503 Joliet Request That conditional use permit No . 88-31 be approved. This is a remodel and will improve the appearance of the subject property and bring it into greater conformity with 'the surrounding neighborhood. I am a Huntington Beach property owner and a local realtor. G Leo P. Keller 21841. Oceanbreeae Ln. Huntington Beach, Ca. 92646 • a r..,... ,._.- .�-.....r.. ......v.:,....-..r.a.:r...r.aa�R'fM1wM►'tfrtl4'RTuSr .ri ... ii r. pis .:ai: (i7A7R17. ..� y., .. •.wr�.rww..... _......� . .-_ "- __ -.._. To MMUngtan Beach Re 3idents and Property.Owners: w As:,a re;9ident and pcopet"ty owner in this'piK of SKuntiiagtora;Beach, it gas with d great pleasure that I ,rrit6ii66d,:the . of�'.the old hawse on the-Mouth- East ,comer o- :'Joliet and Indlanapolia,` rat:,to :fai-"`ftv�'wtiero„ +e are right _. My feelir', wear; ,1Miis`i ;gr*t t3rally U _`home will,got the facelift it 'needs. What a benefit to a1Z of us who live may.'° PPS Perhaps`you have notic that r`ork Was st'.o in the fraubng' stage and that no;work-"taus betin dome in-`three month. -Mils is because the City or &Jntii4O.on Beach` h" Mopped- this project for some 'reasai3 which 141.1 relate to you. Please consider what the implications are, Aeatn #f: �... . By, taking off the old aiding to Prepare the t:eiil djtMg for " t t(a change 'owner t� ec�me into ca�nt?ae � and application fa ordinance {: tion 9652. (b) (c)) this `particu3ar- section deals exclusively with older tame that do root met certain sat-back requirements. that were changed AFTER the hams was built. would you prefer that older homes be mado more attractive? Reason #2: The City also feelm that the home Is being remodeled in excess. About $2155,000 is being spent swirl that is ,a me" fraction of the mat of a nett tsome. If you =had' the option of fi)dng up'your older tome or going out into this real estate, markat to buy a new home, what w tdd you Want to do? Do you feel that people should be able to r model their homes? Personally, I like the blend of different homas down here and prefer Huntington Beads'3 O1dTown/T6nUot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in additic'n' to making the 'home cleaner, safe, . and attractive,NO ADDITIONAL' =ARE F00TAGE, NO ADDMONAL UNIT, NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL MXMM are being adde.-d. Only a r wodel. THIS PROPEM7, 'THIS titer IS ON ME SAM RMATION MAT IT M tit ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your- halp, the PLANNING C"UMION fiFJIH M IS ON AUGUST:16, 1988 at the CITY COUNCIL CILMItS at 7PM. PLEASE COW and PLEASE SIGN OUR MITI SpeCifically, .We a3k your support for the ccnpletion of this remodeling which makes Lxw neighborhood more attractive and provide a better home for a local family. Z, the undersigned, support. the completion of the remodeling of the hoses at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. name a nw k you, Mast! O+Dtxrrrell To Huntington tiagton Beach Residents and Property Owners:, tit .cn a resident and propert part Hugs Hr:�ch, it Was Frith y,;owner; his of , meat :plea9tu�e that;I Kitaneed ,the{remodalinrg df t?�e 'old ?xxsse on',tha Horror- ti _ East rorr�er of„ Joliet and.:Lrxi.iaa teelingi � *'I�ii9 is t , f t: to tear frow Mere..Me are r3,�it POD r My. great , finally this ,him will 'set the faoe]ff t it reeds. What a benetit to all of us Qw,live 'nearby.'� Perhaps you have,noticed that.work was stopped in the f s aril than framing, tags .. n woworst`'h63 been dune in three months. This is because the City of ffiintinjtort L3each has stopped this project for some reams which I will relate to you. Please consider what the implications ac-e. Reason #i : Sy, taking off.:the old siding to prepare tt'e hLaInng :frir stucco (a 'at�mw `that wan stxm on the blueprints and application fora;pernit)', the owner has came into. conflict with an ordiixar ,- (section 9652 (b) (0 ) . This particular section deals exclusively with older homes that do not not certain set-back requirements that were changed AFTER the home was j built. Would you prefer that older hoaxes be made more attcrac:tive? Rea. 42: The 'City also feels ttmt the txm is being re wdeled in exoess. About,s25,00'0 i s being spent and that is a acere fraction of the cost of a new hone. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out ,into this real estate aarket to buy a new home, what would you wnt !o do? Do you feel that people should be able to rva ndel' their games? Personally, .I like the blend of different homes down here and. prefer Huntirigtw Deaeh's O1dTown/Towdot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to aaki�g the.hma- cleanser, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE F=AGE, NO AMITIU" UNIT, NO AllDITIt +iAl. SMRIES, NO"ADDITIONAL BEDROOM are being added. Only a remodel. ,THIS PROPEM, 7111S fM IS ON MIE SAME FOUNDATION THAT Tr HAS oELt ON FOR OVER 50 YEAPS. So,, we reed your help, -the PLANNING C0H41=ON HEARING IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the, CITY CDUNCII. CHAMBM at 7PM. PLEASE CCM and PLEASE SIGN OUR PETI'ITQN. Specifically, we ask your support for t1M completion of this raaadel3.ng reLich makes our neighborhood more attreotive and previ.de a better tome for a local family. i I, the undersigned, support the.% ccopletion of the remodelling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Dach, CA. • � �/,0 '/Xr You C< , a 'j C you, Mirk 0'nonnelt T Huntington o mintBeach Residents and Property Oti+r�ers: As a t'6ii debt and ,..-' er in this part;ot,` 7ti ragtcrn Bench it . t. Pl'bPM _ , �i�oot�e�c of: 3oliet arid� �lis not �do rarthe, ol_d ,t�u�ro.6n tt�e'lbrth� Fast` f We s ; rc�r where arse right , now. � My. feelings wet*e 'This is;:`gzat, finally Chia hole wi11' geb the taoeiirt it needs. that a benerit to'all or us wio live nearby." - Pe�ps .:you have noticed tbat work ww Mopped in the framing stage and that rio�.worir has beenare d in three:aaKxtths.- This is beea .�u the City of "untiiigton Beach ha.3 stopped this- protect for so= rera64= Welch I win relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Rt r� #1 : orr .the old siding to prepare the building fot� stucco (a lrhange that aaas;sh6m on the blueprint9.,and application for:'permit),: ,the o�+ner has Dome into:confliet r�ith an ordinance (section: '9652' (b) (c 1) l is parLiC'ular aeetian deals exclusively 'with older homes that do` not enet ,oartaSn setback requirveents that were c anpd.AFTER the home was built. Would you prefer that older homes be made a�►e attractive? Reaxo< a #2: The"City also feels that the borne is being r mD&1'ed 1n ezce�s. About $25,000 is LxAng spent and that is a so a traction of tt.e coat of a new lime. If you had. the option 'or fixing'up your older home or going out into this real estate ma icet to buy a new 'hceii, What would you want to dell Do you feel that people should be able to remoddl their homes? Perocxally, I -like the blend of_\'different .homes, down here and prefer 11untirq5tocs Dq_ach"s alffown/Townlot area' to the tracts. I should also wmtion that 3n addit :. , on to-mldi•W, the .teams alearaer, safe, : and irttraetive, -: NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FQOrTACE I NO ADDITIOi4Al.. UNIT, NO AMMONAL STURI£S, NO ADDITIGNAL BEDROOMS a v being added, Only z remodel., IM PROPERTY, TtQS 101E IS ON THE SAS FOUNDATION 711AT IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YWS. So, we need your help, tt* PLANttM CCX 'ION WARM IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY COUNCIL 01AME3M at 7PM. PIX-M CCM6 egad PLEASE SIGN OUR Pi:TITION., Spcc m©k y,our neighborhoodey� �rrQ att:ractir the cve and vide a better , of Mis remud ling whichpro home for a local family. j I, the undersigned, support the completion or the modeling of the home at 503 .Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA, Oek U_..rj v-q-- /��tot/rvl CqgC( 't . i Ma* you, Bark 0 c Donnell. To ' HuntirWton Death Re9identa and Property Owners: i 1 Ai"a - , iVMit. and. r0 off t 'lea • r in this: Huntixigtan.Death, it �+as, tti sure that I wi.tanedsed the. remodeling of;the'old house an tha•Mos�tki�-B „P , East `ooc�fer of `Joliet and;ltxdiasia 61.1a,{ riot,.to far h^or where we. are'right now.: MY."fae'l r�s' were, "Thies. �is. t, fining .this haiara wi.21' get ttie faoelift 'it need. . What.a lxmfit to all 'or ua who', life. nearby." Petaps you had•e,.noticed that work was atapped in: the: frarsing stage and ttk t done inp� Dnths'# This s s because the City, of no, si n rite to you. h he me to _ this ro eat for some rea.�or r+hich I will t�gtcxi Beach has 9 consider twat the impl.i.catio�ns am. Reason 41: Ar,:taking orf ,the old aiding' to prepare the building for stuGtua, (a, chaiik6 that-was show on ,the blueprints ux:1 application for�.'pervit), the owner has came into''conflict with an ordinance.. (seetion 9652 (b) (c)) . This particuiar Section deels exclusively with older taxes that do.not aMet. certain set-back` requf.retaents that were cd�raged AMR the ticee was built. Would you prefer that older homes be made Wore' attractive? Reason #2: it OW feels that n th hcme is being r odeled ,in :exceaa. About �, . beinB p that is a mere fraction of t:* cat of a new home. If you had the option'of fixing up your older. home or goipg out into this .rf-.al estate nu*&t to,buy a new; h, P., what would you grant to do? Do you feel that people should be able to_' remodel their hows? Personally, I like the blend of different hwes' down here and prefer Huntington A&ich's OldTowhnownlot,area to the tracts. I stiould also mention that In iddition to making the,lxue cleaner, safe, 'and attmative, NO,,ADDITTONAL';'SQUARE MAGE, NO AIhDMOM UW, .N0 ADDITIONAL SMRIES, NOIDDITIONAL BEDROOM are being added. Only a remodel. THIS PftC)MM, THIS IMM IS ON ME SAM FVEMATIOH TEdAT 17 HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So . we need'`y'oux help, the PLANNING (XtWMI N IWARING IS ON AUGUST_ 16, 1988 t the CITY (IU 5 at PM. PLEASE OCM acid p ZASE SIGN OUR s COUNCIL ? PEI'I'1 Off. .,Specirically, 'we ask your support for the ecoplotion of thi.9 remodeling which cakes our rxdghborhood more attractive find provide a better how for a local family. I, the undarsigned, support tha cmVletion of the remodeling of the ham at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. arhW* you, O'Donnell Aft- To liur t3r4ton Beach Reaidi!nts.,and 'Property tkiners r •'� f ,-.. 'l ♦'•:+ 1 fft- '.: _•" f jf,r 'tom . .'...',. ', , '.,. As a residetlt 'owner:in this,part of Htiriti tcxi`Beach, t and ProPec'ty i xao ,with great..;pleaiah" that. I or the old,house'on .the tWorkt Eait oormr•; of c36liet and 7nd3.ana 119 rat to tar. froie.,;whiece ve" are right , Fi6if. my Yee get; thei�"�great:; � rir>auy this homo �`�� fa©eWt� it needs. that a 'benefit to all 'or us who Live: nearby. Perhaps you have noticed that idrk for stopped � the ,ii-.ur1 "rig�stag� and 'that no.cork;has >:bee� curie in' three months. This is bemuse the"City of Ikxr init,ixi Beach has stepped- this project for some reamis which' I will relate to you. Please comider what the implications are. Reason #1 : HY taking off the old: sid , 'pre . itigto pare the building for stucco (a change that was 3h6wn on ,the blueprints and application ror; permit) , the owner has come Into conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (a) ) . This particular -"tiara deals exclusively with older homes that do not net certain set-back requirements that were changed AFM the' home webs . built. would you prefer that, older homes two made more attractive? llbaut , ODO is" • spent atki that ,i�a mec�e ©le;! in excess. Rea.-= #2: The City also fee, i s that the hove Is be remod $25, being pen fraction or the Cost of a new home. If you had t1m option of rixxing up yam' older hoc a.& going out into this real. estate mdriczet to buy, a new; home, what would you want to do? Do you feel that'people should be able to,,re model their homes7 Per konal ly, I like the blend of difrerent homes .dawn hers and prefer tiunt:ington Beach's ; C11dT4: wn/Townlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that safe, and NO ADDSTIW& SQUARE F DTACE'NO ADDiT d on M& UM 00Ott:AMractive, T'iZONAL S'I1QR3r"5. , N0 ADDITIONAL BOROOM are being r added. 'knly a remodcl. THIS PROPERIT, THIS HONE IS ON THE SAW MRATION THAT IT HAS BEM CH FOR OVER 50 YEARS. Soy we need your hel p, the PLANNING (X HMSION WARM IS ON AUCU5r, 16, 19a8 at',the CM COUNCIL CiUMBUS at 7PM. PLFME COM and PLEASE SIGN OUR PE7TITON. Spcclfically, 'roe ask your support for the CCOPleticn of this remodeling sdach makes our neighborhood hood more attractive and provide a better home for a local family. I, the undersigned, .atupport, the coupletion of the remodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, C.A. name addreas �.� r Thw,k you, Mark O'Donnell y To Huntington Desch Residents and Property Osiers: JL� a resident _. asLcrd P t Y over 3n this part;of flUntirigt4n'Heaeh it Wu : that, I with > Brea. pleas nv witnessed the, ivmxxk of 'tb ,'old hart on' the Not�t.h- Eabt corner ;of�Joliet and�Indianapolis, not to '?f r iro■ inhere � are 'r t fiaall ti ' home will get the mows j.ter feelit �, i�.great; , y facelift it creeds. ifat a benerit to all of us %ho lfye 'ruarby." ' Peips4 you have noticed that Mark Was stopped'in the 'tcamin�g stag and that - no :4brk,has Age wade in three months. Ttus is 'bocaim the City or Huint � has stopped this project for some reasons ti+Qtich I Trill relate to you. P1ai e eider what the implications are. Reasoin #1 ; �g p p� . ,:. . . . BY ,tak�ir'rg� F orf;` t,'ae ;old siding' to re t2ie:.buildirsg for stucco (a. change that rya shmm on the blue rims and application ror,�p irimi.t) , 'the owner has come. into: bad'liet with an ordirmnce _ (seetion' 9652 (b) (c) ) . This particular section deals a elusively with older homes that do not met certain set-bait requirements that Were changed AF'M Uie have was i built. Would you prefer that older hoaaE►.s be wade mDm attractive? .The,City also feels that the home is being ride Reak3on #2: 1.ed in excess. About V25,000 is being spent and that 1s a xern fraction'or the cost` of a new home. It you had the option of Pix1ng up your older home or going out into this real estate nwicet to buy a my home, what .wmad you want to do? 'Do. you feel' that people should'be able to, remodel their homes? Per .11y, I ''Me the blend or dirrerent homes dorm here and ,prefer 1hmti %torr Beach's O1dTowv7o4dat ai to the tracts.: I s) d also mention that in addition to m3aking the.,home cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO. ADDITIONAL,SQ0ARE,',FOGTAGC, NiO ADDITIONAL VW, NO ADDMON11i.. STOMMt NO ADDITIOW%L BEDFW-Z are being added. Only a remodel. 'MIS PROPERTY, MW HW. IS AN 7W SAME FOUNI':ATICH MKT IT HAS BM Oct FOR OVER 50 YUM. I So we need your help, the K ANNZl+yC Cckts=ON HWING +S ON ALVJST 16, 1989 at the.,CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS at 7PM. •PLEASE CW'S =4 PLE= SIGN OUR PEl' . ON. Specifically, we ask your aupport for the camplat{m of this 1 deling which makes ctzr neighborhood more attractive and provide a betttr hcm for a local raml1y. I, this undersigned, support t m c aMl.etion of the modeling or the homer at 503 Joliet, untington Beach, Cat. -2!p r7Stae ad&res3 Thank yocr, Mari O'DcrmI • <t,. TO fkuntingt.,n Roach Residents and Property Owners: A3 a resident and property owner in this part of Hunti Beach, it was with lit pleasure that Y witne."3ed the remodeling of the old house on the V"~Irth East comer of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far from %tere we are right now. MY feelings Were, "This is great, finally this home Will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us who live nearby." Perhaps you have noticed that work was Ito in the f 3 and that stopped framing stage no work has been done in three months. This in because the City of flunt_zagton Beach has stopped this project for some reasons which I Will relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason #1: By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for t stucco (a charge that was shown on the blueprints and appl.i.cation f for per mi.t), the o%mer has come into conflict With an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (c) ) . This particular section deals exclusively with older hczof---% that do not mat certain set-back requirements that were ch-anged AFTER the hcwe was built. Would you prefer that older homes be made more attractive? Reason #2: The City also feels that the home is being remode2.:d in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that i_9 a mere 6action of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older• home or going out into this rn..al estate market to buy a new house, what would you want to do? Do you feel that people should be able to remodel their hom�_s? Personally, I like the blend of different homes dorm here and prayer Huntington Beach's O1dTown/Townlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to making the home cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDrrioNAL =ARE FOOTA.CE, NO ADDITIONAL uNI'r, NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS are being added. Only a s remodel. THIS PROPEffff,, 71EIS 101E IS ON THE WE FWNDATION THAT IT HAS fkM ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS.. f So, we need your help, the PLANNING OOMMMSION HEA.tMC IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY CMICIL CHAMBERS at 7PH. P �- COME and PLEASE SIGN OUR PET.LTION. Specil'i.^.ally, •we ask your support for the completion of tus remodeling sthich makes our neighborhood mom m.+ attractive and provide a better home for a local family. y I, the undersigned, support the coVletion of the remodeling of the at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. r address 6010 047�5cvv Thank you, tic O'r zt Z 3 r: 1 t i To Huntington Beach Residents and Property Owners: A9 a msident and property owner in this part of Iuntington Peach, it was t?ai.th great pleasure that I witnessed the remodeling of the old house on the North- East corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far from where we are rigit now. My feelings were, "This is great, finally this home will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us who live nearby." Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing stage and that no worst has been done in three months. This is because the City of Huntington Leach has stopped this project for some reasons which I will relate to you. Pleaze eider what the implications are. Reason 11 : By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for st:ucen (a change that was shown on the blueprints and appli cation for pemit) , the owner has cocoa into conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (c)) . This particular section deals exclusively with older homes that do not met certain set-hack requireme_rits that were changed AFTER the home was built, Would you prefer that older haves be made more attrautive? Reason 02: The City also feels that the home is being n%modeled In excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate market to buy a new hone, what would you want to do? Do you feel that people should be able to del their homes? Per on lly, I like the blend of different homes down hero and prefer Huntington Beach's O1dTownJTownlot area to they tracts. I shm1d also csent,ion that in addition to msk3ng the hc: •e cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDMONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, NO ADDMONAL UNIT, NO ADDTTIONA[. STORIES, 140 ADDITIOKAL BEDROOMS are being added. truly a remodel. THIS PROPERTY, THIS OWE IS ON VE SAME FOUYDATION THAT IT HAS MIN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, ttce PULMUPiG COt*=ION HEARING IS UN AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY COUNCIL 0i •�ERS at 7PH, PLXASE COW and FIE-AM SIGN OUR PEPITI . Specifically, we ask your support for the completion of this remodelkig which crakes our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better home for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the remodeling of the home at 503 Joliet., Huntington Beach, CA. Ef�'R /1s C.�N `l�-�• -C-�.4 cc;AK Cif . rxaare address 7&.u* you, mu* 0'DocMll r. Y 00 To liuntiragton Beach Residents and Property Owners: As a resident and property owner in this part Of Huntington Beach, it was Witt Veat pleasure that Y witnessed the remodeling of the old houso on the North,- East corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far from where we are right now. MY feelings were, is great, finally this lame will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us who live nearby," Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing stage and that f no work has been done in three months. This is because the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for some reasocm which I will relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. I Beason #1: By taking off the old sidiAq to prepare the Wilding for stucco (a charge that was shown on the blueprints and application for permit) , the owner has cone,n, into ccnfliat with az► ordinance (section 9652 (b) (a) ) . This particular section deai.s exclusively with older homes that do not mat certain se .-back requirements that were cad AFTER the hoar: was built. would you prefer that older hows to made more attractive? Rp4on #2: The City also feels that the home is being remodeled in excess. About $25;000 is being spent and that is a mom fraction of the cost of a r'kl w hare. If you had the opticn of fixing up your older home or going out into this rersl estate market to buy a new hone, what would you want to do? Do you Veal that people should be able to remodel their hon�w%? Personally, I like tht, blend j of different homes down here and prefer Huntington Beach's O1dTown/Townlot area to the tracks. I should also mention that in addition to making the home cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL.SQUARE FOOTAGE, NO ADDITIONAL WIT, NO ADDITIONM STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL DEDROCM are being added. Only a remodel. THIS PROPERTY, THIS 10E IS ON THE SAME FO IDATION THAT IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. i So, we need your help, the PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at .the CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS at 7PM. PLEASE CaIE and PLF-M SIGN OUR PETITION. Specifically, we ask your support for the campletlo+n of this remodeling ueh.ich =ekes our neighborhood mores attractive and provido a better t home for a locaa family. r i I, the undersigned, support the completion of the raaodeling of the hcm at 503 Huntington Beach, CA. 2. na,m�e address + T w k you, Mirk 0'Dor"ll o✓a VS'Q To To Huntington Beach Residents and Property Owners: As a resident and `property owner i i this n. t of H�.-,t i .. •- ington .Qeach, it was with great pleasure that I witnes.-uBd the remodet.ing of the old house on the North- East corner of Joliet and L-Viianapolis, not to far from where we are right now. My feelings were, "This is bleat, finally this horse will got the facelift it needs. what a benefit to all of us who live nearby." jPerhaps you have noticed that work was stoppers in the framing stage and that no work has been done in three: months. This Ls be%=w the City of 11unt1xWtr.n Beach has stopped this project for some reasons which I will relate "*,o you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason #1 : By taking off the old .siding to prepare the building for stucco (a change that was shown on the blueprints and application for;:,permit) , the ownev has comer into confliot with do ordirmce (section 9652 (b) (c) ) . This particular section deal. exclusively with older homes that do not trot certain set-buck requirements that were changed AFTER the home was built. Would you prefer that. older homms be made more attractive? Reason f2: The' City also feels that the horse is be;ng remdcled in excess. { About 325,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your f older home or going out into this real estate ma,*et to buy new home, what would you want to do? Do you reel that people should be able to r eLoodel, their hods? Personally, I like the bled of different homes down here and prefer 'Huntington Be aeh's O1dTownlTowalot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to making the home cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, ND ADDITIONAL UNIT, NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO ADDITIC4M BEDROOM are being added. Only a remodel.. HIS PROPERTY, THIS fEW IS ON THE SAME FOUNDATION THAT IT I AS MEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the PLANNING CCfVMiON HEARrm IS ON AUGUST. 16, 1998 at the CITY UOUNCIL G'WM S at ?PM. PLEASE COW. and F`,..EM SIGN MR PE'I'LTI00. Specifically, we ask your support for the completion of this r =deling which maces our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better home for a local. famil.V,. I, the undersigied, support the c=letion of the reavdeling of the hoar a: 503 Joliet, Eiunti Wton Bead, CA. name TVJyL4 Thank you, Nark O'Dormil i TO Hurntington Leach Residents and Property Owners: As a resident and property owner in this part of Huntington Beach, it was with great plea -mm that I witnessed the remodeling of the old house on the North- 'East corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far from where we are rat norr. My feelings were, Trats is great, finally this home will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to aU of us who live nearby. " Perhaps you have noticed that work: s-s stopped in the framing stoma and that no work has been dog in three months. This is bemuse the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for Some rea.rc= wt,ich I will relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reasai f1: By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for stucco (a change that was shown on the blueprints and application for; permit) , the owner has come into conflict With an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (a) ) . this particular section deals exclusively with older hoes that do not met certain set-back requirements that were changed AF'TEM the home was built. Would yov prefer that older homes be made more attractive? Reason #2: The City also feels that the home is being r oodeled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that i.9 a mei*e fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fJx ng up yow, older home or going out into this real estate awtat to buy a new ham, what would you uar; to do? Do you feel that people should be able to immodel their how-s? Personally, I like the bled of different tromes down here a A prefer f itington Beach's 01dTown/Townlot area to the tracts. I should also nuition that in addition to making the ham cleaner, safe, and attractivQl NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOCITAGE, NO ADDITIONAL UN1'T, NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO ADDMONAL I1EOW are broing added. Only a remodal. THIS PROI'EYMO THIS HOW IS ON THE SAME FDWATION TILT IT ETAS MIN. ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the PLUOMC COMMISSION HF,ARM IS ON AUG= 16, 1988 at the CITY CWKM CHAMBERS at 7PH. K- ASE COM and PLEASE SIGH! OUR PE 1TI . Specifica],ly, we ask your support for the ooWletion of this remodeling which does our r W*.-srttood more attractive and FToyide a better howe for a local fami ly. t, the undersigned, support the completion of the reeeodel.ing of the home at 503 Joliet, Ihmtington Beach, CA. 1 r,,,,�-•s'.t ,� 1 r r.� ".: lid✓�� t.i / � ♦:♦ . � �.1,� nam address _J L.' lhw* you, Hoak O'Donnell To 1untin9ton Beach Residents and Property Owners: As a resident and property owner in this part of lluntingt.on Beach, it was with great pleasure that 7 witnessed the mnodeling of the old houso on the North- j East corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far from where we are rigit now. My feelings were, "This is great, finally this home WA-11 get the faceli-ft it needs. That a benefit to all of us who live nearby." Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the fnam ng stage and that no work has been done in three months. This is because t;be City of lluntingt:on Beach has stopped this project for same reas(ms which I will relate to you. Please consider what', the implications are. I Reason t1 : By taking off the old sidilig to prepare the building for stucco (a change that was shown on the blueprinl.s and application for permit) , the owner% has come into conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 W W ) . This particular section deals exclusively witl; older homes that do riot met certain set-back requirements that were changed AFTER the home was built. Wa ld you prefer that older homes be made more attractive? Reason 12: The City also feels that the home is Wng remodeled in excess, About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate market to buy a new home, what would you want to do? Do you feel that people ! should be able to remodel their homes? Personally, I Me the b1mW of different homes down here and prefer Huntington Beach's aldTownlTownlot area to the tracts, I should also mention that in addition to making the home clearer, safe, and attractive, No ADDITIONAL JS UAAE FOOTAGE, NO ADDM VIAL UNIT, NO ADDITIONAL SIYJRIES, µ) ADDITIONAL. BEDROOMS are being added. Only a remodel. THIS PROPERTY, TIUS WHEE IS ON THE SALE FOUNDATION THAT IT Has BEEN ON FOR OM 50 YE.A.RS, So, we need your help, the PLAWING CCaM MION WARING IS ON AUGUST, 16, 1988 at the CITY COUNCIL. CHAMftE RS at 7PM. PLEASE CW and PLEASE SIGN OUR PL•'TI'1`ION. Specifically, wA ask your support for the ccmpletion of this remodeling which sakes our nei&,hborhood more attractive arxi provide a beater how for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the rvmrs3eling or the I ome at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. f?j -�----- ELMORE TOYOT'A name a f 1 ,� L, ISM Beach'Boulawr;J PAUL ��' s l•7� OV= '4 W921fnin3ter,Catlfw-" 9268-1 t tsi � Au1'��ra Thank you, Mark O'Dormll , But. (7141 894-33.'2 . (213) 582.Mi a, S. To Efuntix gton. Beach Residents and Property Owners: . As a resident and property oimer to this pa.^t of 1Vznt,1z1gtw E meh, it was kwl great pleasure that I witnessed t %e reeling of the old house on the !forth- Fast corner of Joliet awJ Indian.:,o1is, riot to far from Where we are r L#iL• now. &M feelings were, "This is great, finally this.home, will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us who live nearby." Perhaps you Nave noticed that work was stopped in the framing, stage and that no worst has been done in ttu*ee months. This is bemuje the City of Huntington Heinch has stopped this project for some reasons which I will relate to you. Please consider What the implications are. Reason I1 : By takixq off the old siding to prepare the building for stucco (a charge that Was shorn on the blueprints and application for permit) , the owner has come into cmflict with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (a) ). This particular section deals exclusively with older homes that do not met certain set-back requirements that were changed AFTER the hme was built. Would you prefer that older homes be made more attractive? Reason #2: The City also feels that the home is beLng r=W.eled in excess. About $25,000 it Arzg spent cnd that is a mere traction of the cast of a new ham. If you had the option or fixing up your olde.- home or going out Into this real estate market to buy a new home, what Would you want roc do? Do you f*el tiuit pwpl+e should be atle to remodel aeir homes? Personally, I like the blend of different homes down hem- and prefer Huntington Beach's OldTawnlToinilot area to the tracts. I should also mwtion. that In addition to making Lie home cleaner, safe, .and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE F=AGE, hX) ADDTTI0tLkL UUM', NO ADDMOtUL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS am being added. Only a I remodel. 11M PROPERTY, THIS IM IS ON TfiE SAME FIOUN ATION 111Xr IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your heap, the Pi.AKM;G COhiFi=1014 kiPAR= M ON AUGUST 161 1988 at the CITY COUNCIL CfiA SERS, at 7PH. PLEASE CCME and PLEASE SIGN C'JR PETITION. spit arieally, we ask your support ror the ecmmplation of this reaodel.ir%g which makes our neighborhood more attractive arxf provide a batter home for a local ''amil.y. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the ranodeling of the xe at 9503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. n31AE3 address a Ttuu� you, K-u* O r Donnell i. To Huntington Beach Residents and Property Owners: As a resident and property owner in thts part, of Huntington Beach, it was with great, pleasure that I witnessed the r e doling of the old house on th© North- Fast 'corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not '%:o tar from where we are right now. Xy Peelings were, "This is peat, finally this home will get the face]ift it nos. What a benefit to s1-. of us who live nearby." Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing stage wW that no ;aor)t has been done in three Months. This .is because the City of Hunts:r4o ci Beach haz stopped this project for :omn reasons which r will relatie to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason /1: ;By taking off the old siding to prepare the NLVAding for stucco (a change that was shown on the bluefu-izits and application for permit) , the caner has come into aor.Pliot frith an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (c) ) . Zhi.n particular section deals exclusively with older homes that do not tact certain set-back requirements that were changed AFM the how was built. Would you prefer that older Imes be made more attractive? Reason .... The City also "eels that the homy is being rma doled in excess. fAbout $25,000 is being spent and that is a mom fraction of the I cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older how or going out into tKis real estate maritet to buy a new home, what would you want to do? Do you feel that people should be able to rawdel theLr- homes? Persoml.ly, T like the blend of different ho ao down here tar.( prefer Huntington beach's i Old're►u ir-ownlot area to the trants. I should also oxmtion that in addition to staking the hone cleaner, 3&.f©, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, NO ADEorrIONAL ',SNIT, NO ADDITIONAL SWRIES, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROOM are being added. Only a remodel. THIS PROPERTY, THIS HChEE IS ON THE SAME FOUNLATION VAT IT HAS BEM ON FOR OVEN 50 YEARS. So, we new your ;yelp, the PLANKING COMMISSION 1EARDIG IS 01 AUGUST 16, 1988 • at ,the CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS at 7PM. P1.F.ASE 00 M and PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION. Specifically, 'we ask your support for the completion of this remodeling which makes our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better home for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the corpletion of the mmodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, C.A. �' r addvew 44 Thank you, Mark ,O'Damll 04 To Huntington Beach Residents and Property Owners: As a reside-at and property owner in this part of Huntington Beach, it Was with great pleasure that I witnessed the remodeling of the old house on the North- East corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, mt to far frcun where we are right now. My feelings were, "Ibis :ts great, finally this home will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us who live rk=4ay." Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing staff and that no work has be.w done in three months. This is becau3e the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for some reasons which: I will relate to you. Please corsider what the impLications are. Reason #1 : By taking off the old siding to ptmpare the: building for stucco Is change that was shown on the blueprints and application for permit) , the cA er has came into conflict with an or•d1na nce (section 9652 (b) (c) ). This particular section deals exclusively with older hrAws that do not met certain set-back requirements that were changed AFTEI't the .hwxne was built. mould you prefer that older homes be made more attractive? Reason #2: The City also feels that the have is tieing remodeled in excess. About $251000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate maricet to buy a new home:, what would you want to do? Do you feel that people should be able to remodel their fumes? Personally, I lance the blend of different homes down here and prerer Huntington Beach's O1dTownlTownlot area to the tracts. 'I should also mention that in addition to making the home cleaner, 'salfe, and attractive, NO ADDITIOUL SQUARE FMAGE, NO ADDITIONAL UM, NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO ADDMONAL. BEDROCKS are being addW. Only a remodel. TfQS PROP10M, TMS ME IS ON TW SAW FMIDATION THAT IT HAS BM ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we .eed your tplp, the PLANNING CCi+USSION HEUM IS ON AUCUSr 16, 1968 at the CITY CQUhCIL CWWRS1 at YPM. P UR COPS and PLEASE SIGN O PEON. Specifically, .we ask your support for the completion of this remodeling which makes our neiEliborhood more attractive and provide a getter home for a local family. I, ;he undersigned, support the completion of the rcoodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. IL ,� r 1 addresa. Thr,rsk ,you, mark O'Donmll ,i r 1-7- To hUntington Beach Residw.Ls and Property Drmem: As a resident and property owner Li this part of Huntington Dearth, it was with grea, pleasur;: that I witnessed the remodeling of the old house: on the North- East comer of Juliet and Irdi nuiapolis, not to far fro© -where we are ri&t now. My feelings weee, "This is great, finally thij home will get the facelJ ft it needs. Wrot a benefit to all of us whc live no-srrby." i Perhaps you have noticed thaic work was stopped in the framing stage and that no work has been done in three months. This is because the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for w me reasrns which T relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason 11: By taking off the old alding to prepare the building for , stucco (a change that was shorn cn the blueprints and application for mit,) , the owner has cove into crnfliet with an ordirbnce. (section 9652, (b) (c) ) . This particular section deals exclusively With older homes that do not met certain set-back. requirementa that were chwW%A AFTER the home was built. Would you prefer that older Nxws he made cadre attractive? Reason 02: The City also feels that the home is being remodeled in excess. About $25,0,00 is being pent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new hacne. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate market to buy a newr.'home,. what would you want to do? Do you feel that people shoal.d b l able to remodel their hoar? Personally, I Me the blend of different homes down here and prefer Huntington Beach's OldTownlTownlot area to the tracts. I should alzn mention t1,.at , in addition to taking the home cleaner, safe, a:r4 attractive NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE F'OOTACEt NO ADDITIONAL UNIT, NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL =ROOMS are being added. Only a remodel. THIS PROPEfM, THIS fM IS ON ME SAME FOUNGATIC44 THAT IT HA,S BM ON FOR ov•.R 50 YEARS r So, we need your help, the PLAN nM 0C4USST(.N E1r.ARING IS Off AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY COUNCIL CHAt",I3ERS at ?PM. PLEASE DI-S and PLEASE SIGN OUR PETTTION. Specifically, .we ask your support for the canpletien of tFim remodeling which awakes our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better haae for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the rarodeling of the home; at 503 Jo et, Huntington Beach, CA. (714) a41.3145 Ulm addmlls %I�l. /� r iLI�? � ��✓3J� '�� Revventio a 4 N ammerclsl @uudMq F►ee Fat,matea•wh,a4ty Cr3113m An thlp it arwk you, hark O'Donnell+ GEORGE PAtlltARO aer�.iN Coytractcr LW_ui8t 7J Donato A Inauted i To ffuntington Beach Residents and Property Owners: As a resident and Property a�cr in thi9 par of Eunt i.-gtor Beach, it was with great pleasure that: I witnessed the remodeling of the old house on the North- &,st corner of Joliet: and Indiampol", not to far frcam where m are night now. My feelings were, Mhin i4 great, finally this have will, get the faceli'i t it needs. lit a benefit tl all of us who live nearby." Pet%haps you ha- ve noticed Lhat work was stopped in the framing stage and that no work has been done in three ironnths. This i.9 because the City ct Huntington Beach has stopped this project for some reasom which I will. relate to you. Please wider what the implications are. Reason #1: By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for stucco (a change that %= shown on the blueprints and application fot" ,permit) , thrs owner I= come .into cxWliet «with an ordinance (sect•kon 9692 (b) (6) ). This partictdar section deals exelust:ely with older homes that do not,met certain set-back requirements that urre changed AF M the hares twos btxUt. Mould you prefer that older hcma' bu made more atte ntive? Reason 12: The City also feels that the home is being remodeled in excws. About $25,000 is being spent and that s a mere fraction of the cast of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate market to busy a new home, what would you grant to do? Do you feel that peoplo sh uld be able to remAel their homes? Personally, I like the blend of different: tomes down here and pmfer Huntington Beach's O1dTown/Townlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to making the home cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL MARE FODTIBE, NO ADDI' ONAL =71 NO AUGI'1'IONAL MRIES, NO ADDITIONAL BED.4W-Z are being added, Only a remodel. :'}ice PROPERTY, 'PHIS tM IS ON THE 51 M FOUNDATION THAT i IT HAS i UA FOR OVER 50 YEAnS. y So, we need your help, the PLANNIM CCNrf i=ON HEAIMIG IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 s at the CITY COUNCIL C YMMLS at ?PM, PLEASE COW. and PLEASE SIGN OUR PET. MON. Specifically, we ask your support for the completion of Lhis remodeling ng which makes our neightxirhood more attra.:tive and provide a better home for a local family, I, the undersigned, support the completion or the remodeling of the hwe at 503 Joliet, Huntington Bch, CA. q027 41, MVM�.. ... address, 4�%L insole you, Dark O'Donnell To Huntington Beach Hesiden s and Property Owners As a resident and property iNner in this 06� cf ftitIn ton, Beach, it vas wi'..n great pleasure that I tiri tnegsed the eling of tr.e oU house on wile North-- East corner of .Joliet and 1 AUL-wua , not to far fvom where we are right Ww. MY feeli.rgs were, "`I'hia is great, firmJL'y this ham will get thw facelift it needs. What a benefit t.,) 4,111 of w who _•.:.ve nearby. " � Perhaps you have noticed trot work was stopped in the framing stage and that no work has been done_ jn three months. M%is is because the City of �tington Beach has in this project for m= reax= which I 'Kill relate ' you. Please c ow',der what the implications are. i Reasor : :: By taking off the old sidi:%g to prepare the txiUdirui for stucco (a ch,xLm that was shcwm on the blueprints and application for permit) , the owner has came into conrliet 'with an ordinarp-e (sfttlon 9652 (b) (6). This particular section decda exclusively with older homes that do rit met ee;•tain set-back requiranent,s ',hat were c i:,anged AFM. X the `►aag wx built. would you prefer- that older homri bra mde more tractive? Reason 12: The City also feels Uiat LhF :x;raa is being r ewdeled i;wi excess. 1 .t that yet of the Abo�.t $25,t?00 is acing spt�. dr�d ha is 3 m� fraction cost of a new home. If you 1-iu the option of fixing up y," older home or goirW. mt inW this real estate mrkut to buy a i new hormm, what would you want W do? Do you feel that pe"le should be able to remAel their homes? Personally, I like the blend 'of different homes down here and prefer Huntington Beach's !' O1dTown/Townlot area to the tracts. I .N. Mid also mention that In addition to making the home cleaner, ;=f&, and attractive, NU ADDITIONAL. SQUARE FOOTAGE, NO ADDMONAL Uh'TT, tiA ADDITIONAL STOR.TES, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS are being added. Only a remodel. TLLIS PROPERTY, IMES JEW IS W THE SAME FOUNDATION THAT IT HAS BM; ON FOUR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the PLANNING GC14ISSION HFARIM IS ON AU LUcT 16, 1988 at the CM COUNCIL CIMMBERS at Mi. PLEASE t� and PLEASE SIGN OUR pKanON. Specifically, "we ask yow- support, for the coopletion of this remodeling which mantes our ne ghbor hoe i mure attrae a ve send provide a better home for a local. family. I, the undersized, support the rxopletion of who remodeling of the tx= at 503 Joliet, Huntington ' .Lch, CA. name ® van lti" yote, lark O'Dcnnell To Fiuntir' xt. n Wach flesidents and Property Owners: As a resident and ro f perty owner in this of Etuntington F3aach, .i t cAa with great pleasure that I wit:iessed the =t��tto ng of the old house on the North- East corner of Joliot and S�ui , far from where we are right now. My feeling were, "This is great, finally this home krill get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all or us who live nearby." Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the franing stage and Mat M wo.'}c has been done in three months. IhLa is be cauzo the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for scare ►­aions which I will relate to you. Pleas: consider What the impl.ication:D are. Reason 01 : By taking oYf the old siding to prepare; the building for stucco is change that was shown on the blueprints and application foi% permit) , the corner has come into conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 f b) (0 ) . ThU particular section deals exclusively wir<h older homes t kit do not met certain get-back requiramcnts that were changed AF11 R the hme ww built. World you prefer that older how.ss to made more attractive? Reas-on 12: 'T' e City also feels that the home is being rewdeled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent mid that is a cx<r a fraction of the cost of a new hrm. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into thin mal a ntate market to buy a new 1u=e, what would you want .to do Do you ft.vl that people shnu:d be able to remodel their homes? Persm-aly, I like the blend I of different homes down here .end prefer Huntington Dearh's OldTownlTownlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to makJxg the home: Ilea ,,.r•, We, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL Stet M FWrAGE, NA Ai3DM(3N& UNIT, NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL MROOMS are being added, Only a remodel. THIS PROSPF:M, THIS DOME IS QN THE SAME EMIDATIM THAT rr HAS BEEN Of? FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the PLANN114G OOMUSSION 1¢:ARTNG IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 -it the CITY COUNCIL CHAMBM at 7PH. PI RASE OGW anA PLEASE ,SIGN 00 Pb'TI'T'I.ON. Speeirical..ly, we ask your support for the oo 2letion of this remodelirg& which makes our naighbor hood wren attractive amid provide a better home for a local. family. Y, the undersigned, support the ccxa!pletion of the remodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, 1imtingWn Beach, CA. soaae Thank you, Mw-k O'Donnell t To hluntlngton Beach Residents and Property Owners: As a resident and property owner in this #jrtof lhmtington Peach, it was with great pleasure that I witnessed the eling of the old house on the North-- East corner of Joliet and LadWQpoga, not to far from where we are right now. My feels W were, "This is great, finally this home wi11 get the facelift it needs. What a ber►efit• to all, of us who Live nearby." Perhapa you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing stage and that no work has been done in three annths. This is because the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for some reasons which I will Erelate to you. Please cormider vAiat the implications are, Reason #1: By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for stucco (a ci•unge that was shown on the blueprints and appli,ration for permit) , the owner tms come into conflict w',.th an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (c) ) . This particular section deals exclusively with older homes that do not met certain set--back requirements that were chanpeA AFPER the hoar ua3 built. Would you 1>i%efer that older hams be grade more attractive? Reason 1E2: The City a].so reels that the home is being remodeled in ex, . About $25,000 is being spent and that .in a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate maricet to buy a new home, what would you want to do? Do you feel that people f should be able to model their howas? Personally, I l.f,k.e the blend of different horns down here and preSer 11untington Peach's OldTo;m/Townlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to making the horse cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL. SQUARE: FOOTAGE, NO ADDITIUM UkZT, NO ADDMONAL SMRIES, NO ADDITIONAL fiMRO0MS are being added. Only a remodel. T LM PROPEIi'1'y', THIS IME I:3 ON IME SAME FOUNDATION THAT IT HAS WEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. Soy we need your help, the PLANNIM C01aSSION 1EARING IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY COUNCIL C11AMBE:RS at 7P►1. PLEASE `, ' and PI SIGN OUTI PETMON. Specifically, we ask your support for the completion of this r deling which sakes our neighbonccxad =re attractive and provide a better home for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the r cmodalipg of the hoar at 503 Joliet, hiuntirtgton Beach, CA. 4 4 U- 9c) E-1- S name ac „.., To Huntington Beach Re3ident3 and Property 0dru%-a: As a resident and property owner in thin par Mxntingtm Beach, it was with ,meat pleasure that I witnessed t1vi ing of the old house on the North- East corner of Joliet and l�di� , not to far frow v here we arc ri,*t � now. My feelings were, "ThAz is vat finally this he w will �t the Br � � ; Paeelift it needs. what a benefit to all of us who live nearby.” Perhuaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing stage and that no work has been done in three months. This is because the City of llunti.ngton Pa-;tch has stopped this project for some reasons which I wi.Ll. relate to you. Please eomsider what the implications are. t'►na #1 : By takimg oft the old riding to prepare the building for stucco (a ctsange that was shoym ou the blueprints and application I for permit) , the owner 1= cow- into conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 W (0 ) . This particular section deals exclusively with older h xz that do met certain set-back requimmenta that were ctuuged A-FrER the home was built. Mould you prefer that older homes be made more attractive? ' Reason 12: The City also reels that the home is being remodeled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up: your older home or going out into this real estate marl l to buy a new home, what would you want to do? Do you feel that people should be able to model their homes? Peroonally, I like the blend of different hoaxes down here and prefer Hunti ngton beach's Ol.d'Towr-v7ownlot area to the tracts. I should also wjition that in addition to making the home cleaner, safe, mW attrmctive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, NO ADDITIONAL MIT, NO ADDI71ONAL � SMRIFS, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS are bring added. Only a remodel. 'TEI£S PROPERTY, THIS Ii01'iE IS Ott THE SAME FOUNDATION THAT IT IM BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the PLANNING W14TMIDN HI•:ANING IS CH AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CM COUNCIL CHAMBEASS at 7PM. PLEASE CCHE and PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION. Specifically, we ask your support for the completion of this remodeling deling which makes our neighborhood core attractive and provide a better I for a local. family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the remodeling of the home at Joliet, tingtc�n Beach, CA. e ,_ 1 r li addxmn _ t lbw* you, Mont 0'Dar w11 a � To llunti.s*itn Btach flesid;7t3 and Property Owners: ;t As a r+e3ideret andpropertyotime in thi o ant Beach, it was with r f H �� , great pleasure that I witnessed the e7 irk of the old house on the North- East corner of Joliet and Jad,iar�ape14 , not to far from where we are right now. My feelirigs were, "This is grsat, finally this home: will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us who '.live nearby." Perhaps you nave noticed Uut work was stopped in the framing stage and that no work has been done in three months. 'This is because the City of Huntington Beach has stopped thAz project for -v= reasons which I will relate to you. Pleases consider what the implications are. Reason #1: By taking off the old siding to prepare the building &or stucco (a change that was :shown on the blueprints and application for pernit) , the owner has coax; into conflict, with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (c) ). This particuLar nection deals exclusively with older homes that do not tvzt certain set-Hack requiremnts Mat were changed AFM the home was built. Would you prefer that older hones be node more attractive? Reason #2: The City also feels that the hoax' is being rvrrxieled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new how. If you had the option of fi3d ng up your olden home or going out into this real estate anrket to buy a new hcee, what would you Kant to do? Do you .feel that people should be- able to remodel their homes? Personally, I like tMe blend of different homes down hem and prefer lluntirq ton Beaches O1dTownlTounlot area to the: tract.9. I should also w-ntion that in addition to making the hcxme cleaner, safe, tend attractive, NO ADDITIORAL. SQUARE FOOTAGF, NO ADDITIONAL UNIT, NO ADDYTIONAL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL BE)RO343 are being added. Only a remodel. THIS PROPERTY, 119S ICHE IS ON ME SM E FOUNDATION MAT IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. Sol we need your help, the PLANNING COMMISSIOti MUM IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY CC ICZL aw,akt,,m at ?PM!. PLEASE 00M and PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION. Specifically, we ask your support for the coa-pletion of this remcdoling which makes our ne4ghbor hood cwre attractive and provide a better tome for a local family. . I, the undersigned, support the cocaplation of the rexrodeling of the home at 503 Joliet funtingtoi Beach, CA. nacre a rti: s Thane you, Marie O'Donnell. ..- ,. i;• i"„_1 ray .'. s To luntington Beach Residents and Property Owners: As a resident amd property owner in this cP 11untixigton Beach, it was with groat pleasure that I witnemed the: el.ing of the old houses on the North- Fast conzer of Joliet and Indianapv 14d,. rot to far from where we are right now. toy feelings were, "This is great, r nally this home will get the facelift it; needs. What a benefit to all of us who Live nearby. " Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing stage and that. no work has been done in three months. Thl.s is becaume the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for some reasrons which I will relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason f1 : By taking off the old :4iding to prepare the building for stucco (a charge Mat was shown on the blueprints and application for Permit) , the owner has come into conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (a) ). This particular section dels exclusively velY With older hom es that do not met certain set.-back requirements that were changed AFTER the home was built. Would you prefer that older homes be and© more attt-uctL te? Reason 12: The City also feels that the huge is being remodeled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a Caere fraction of the cost or a new home. If you had the option of Fixing up your older home or goi►tg out into this real estate market to buy a new home, what would you want .to do.' Do you reel that people should be Phle to remodel their homes? Personally, I like the blend of different: homes down here and prefer Huntington Beach's O1d7own/Townlot area to the tracts. I s:tould also mention that in addition to making the home cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, NO ADDITIMML. MI 114 ADDITIONAL SMRIES, NG ADDITIONAL BEDROCM are being added. Only a remodel. IWIS PROPERTY, 119S IM IS VW THE SAME FOUNDATION MAT IT 1i1S BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. � So, we need your help, the PIJJWNG CONMMION I EARIIMG IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY ODUt1CIL CHAMBERS at 7PM. PLEA. COME and MY" SIGN OUR PIMTTOt1. Specifically, we ask your support for the ocapletion of thiss remodel.i.ng which onk s our.neighborhood more attractive and provide a better � home for a lo.^.a.l family. � I, the undersigned, support the ccWletion of the rcuodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. name address Thank you, ttrk O'Donnell M To 11unt n Beach nesid s inBto cnt and Property Owners: As a r 3ident and property owner in this t oP Huntir P P'e Y ,atop Beach, it was with great pleasure that I Witnessed the cling of the old hou-sc on the NorthM Fast cornets of Joliet and :� , not to far frcm where we are right now. My feelings were, "This is great, fina.'"_ly this home will get the facelift it needq. What a benefit to all, of us who live nearby." Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing stage and that no work has been done in three months. This is because the City of Huntington Beach K-w stopped this project for sacae reasons wttLich I will relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason 11 : By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for stucco (a change that was shown on the blueprints Oral application for permit) , the cwner has come into conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (a) ) . This particular section deals exclusively with older homes that do not met certain set-back requirements that were changed AFM the home was built. Would you prefer that older homes be =de more attractiva? Reason M The City also feels that the home is being remodeled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction or the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate market to buy a new home, what would you want ,to do? Do you feel that people should be able to remodel their homes? Perscnally, I Like the; blend of different homes down here and prerer Huntington Beach's OlffowT lTownlot area to the tracts. I should .also mention that in addition to making the hcxre cleam-r, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE [•M TAGE, NO ADDITIORAL UM, NO ADDITIC311AL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROM-S are. being added. Ctily a Model. THIS PROPERTY, THIS HOME IS ON 11LE SAME FOUNDATION THAT IT HAS BEEM ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So. we need yc ar help, the PLANNING COMKLSSION HEAR.IM LS ON AUGUST 16, 1986 at the CITY COUNCIL MAIVERS, at 7FM. PLEASE CLIME and PLEASE SIGN OUR PEI` rION. Specifically, we-aak your support for the coq)letion of this r=odeling which makes our neighborhood more: attractive and provide a better home for a local family. I, the undersigned, suppoft the completion or the remodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. r-240 M name addrva3 'lhv* you, 1�rk O'Donnel l r To Huntington Beach Residents and Property Owners As. a resident and property uwner in this pant of Huntington Beach, it was with great pleasure that I witnessed the remodeling of the old house cn the North- East corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far from where we are ri&it now. My feelings, were, "This is great, firza.ly this home will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us who live nearby." Perhaps you have noticed that cork was stopped in the framing stage and that no work has been done in three monthi. This is because; the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for saw reasons crhich I wil] relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason 11 ; By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for stucco (a change that was shown on the blueprints and application for permit) , the owner has come into conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (c)). Thiz particular section deals exclusively with oldex- homes that do not net certain set-back requirements that were changed AFTER the home was built. Would ,you prefer that older homes be made more attractive? f Reason 12: The City 31so feels that the home is being remodeled to excess. j About $2.5,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a nent horse. If you had the option or fixing up your alder how or going out into this real estate market to buy a nL-.d hoax, what would you want to do? Do you feel that people should be able to remodel their homes? Personally, I like the blend of different hooves down here and prefer tlunLington Dw- ch's OldTown/Towrnl.ot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to caking the home cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL. SQUARE FWrACE, NO ADDITIONAL UNIT, NO ADDITIONAL TrORIES, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS are being added. Oaly a remodel. THIS PPOPERIY, 7111S fXW IS ON THE SAME FOUNDATION THAT IT HAS SM ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, . the PLANNING l:VILiMION f IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY CWICIL CHAMURS at ?PH. PLEASE COME and PLEASE SIGN OUR . PLTIIZON. Specifically, we ask your support for the completion of this remodeling which makes our neighbor±x;od more attractive and provide a better home for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the rem doling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. 'lank you, Mark 0'Daniell To 11unt1r4Kt,0n Beach Residents and Property Owners: i As a resident. and property owner in this part of lluntirAgton Detach, it was with great pleasure that I witnessed the remodeling of the old house on the North- East corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far fr m where we are rigtrt now. My Teelings were, "This is great, finally this hcrne will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us who live nearby." Peliv3ps you have noticed that work was stopped in the fi-aning stage: and that no work has been done in three nontha. This is because the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for some reasons wtuich I win relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason #1 : By taking oft the old siding to prepare the building for stucco (a change that was alhown on the blueprints aM application for per 1t) , the owner has came into conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (a) ). This particular section d•w1s exclusively with older homes that do not wet certain set-back requirements that were changed AFTER the home was built. Would you prefer that older hooey be made wre attractive? Reason 12: The City also feels that the home is being remodeled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate market to buy mi new home, what would you want to do? Do you feel that people should be able to remodel their homes? Pe:rsoanlly, I like the blend of different homes down here and prefer Huntington Beach's U1dTawm/Townlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that In addition to making the home cleaner, safe, and attractive, N0 ADDM(?NAL SQUARE FXOOTAGE, NO ADDITIOAL UNIT, NO ADDITIONAL SMRIM, 110 ADDITIONAL. BEPPOCVS are being added. Only a remdel. THIS PROPERTY, T;ii i 1KVE IS ON THE SA1HE FOUNDATION THAT 1T HAS BM ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the. PL.AHNI2CC CCHUMION HEAP. M IS ON AUGUST 16, 19M at the CITY COUNCIL CHAH&M at 7PH. PLEASE CLME and PLEASE SIGN OUR P�"I'IfiIO,`1. Specifically, we ask your support for the completion of this remndcling which makes our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better ham for a local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the rvmodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. ?hank you, bark O'Donnell .�......... .. ........ ♦;:,., .. _:. ,.,..,.3'i:+Fl �:♦iL:a`.�w Jlv.r. '-..1 .. .. - r�r\ .t♦ .... .. .rsw.w�.s ... _.___.__—.__ _ To E untitgton beach Re sidents and Property Ownens , As a resident and ro P PAY' owner in this part of Hunti,t4;ton Beach, it was with great pleasure that Y witnessed the remodeling of the old house on the North- East, corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far from where we are H4it now. rIy feelings were, "Ibis is great, finally this home will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of us who live nearby." Perhaps you have noticed that work was stoppedin the f s t no work has been done in three months. Thi is because the City of Huntington Beach t as stopped this project for some reasons which I frill relate to you. Ple3.ie consider what the implications are. Reason #1: By taking off the old siding to prepare the budding for stucco (a change that was shoran on the blueprints and application for permit) , the owner has cam into conflict with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (c) ) . This particular section deals exclusively with older homes t1wit do not met certain set-back m-quirements that were changed AFTER the hme tins built. Would you prefer that older homes be made more attractive? Re.-son 02: The City also fctas that: the home is being remodeled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up yaur older hcma or going out into this real, estate mrket to buy a I new home, %fiat would you want to do? Do you feel that people should be able to remodel their how-s? Personally, I like the blend � of different homes down here and prefer Huntington Beach's Ol.dTo%mnownlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to making the home cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FbOTACE, NO .ADDITIONAL UNIT, N0 ADDIF.TONAL SI-OR- IFS, 110 ADDITIONAL BEDROOMS are being added. Only a remodel. IRIS PROPERTY, THIS iKM IS ON TdE SAME FOUNDATION THAT IT HAS BUN ON- NOR OMI 50 YF.ARS. So, time need your help, the PLANNING COMMIMI'M EiEMW4G^ IS ON AUGU�aM' 16, 1988 at the CITY LWNCII. t�iIM'fiS at 'KPH. PLEASE COM and PI.F.ASE SIGN OUR PETITION. ::pecifically, time ask your support for the completion of this remodeling which mkes our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better home for a local. family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the remodeling of the home at 503 Joliet, Huntington Peach, CA. rna=r address you, mark o'Donwll ..a" ...Y`:Tf.Yi'.wiw^ai..w...w...t*.:-•t -;. , t - : !.'! .Y..S�/lt'F AI , I To Huntington Beach Residents and Property owners: r As a resident and property owner in this part of Huntington Beach, it was with great pleasure that I witnessed the rvmdeling of the old house on the North- East corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far froca where we are right now. My feelinV were, "This is great, finally this home will get the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all, of us who live nearby." r Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing stage and that no work has been done in three months. This is because the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for some reasons which I will relate to you. Please consider what the implications are. Reason #1 : By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for stucco la change that was shown on the blueprints and application for permit) , the owner has come into eonfliet with an ordinance (section 9652 (b) (c) ) . This particular section deals exclusively with older homes that do not met certain set-back requirements that were changesd AF 1ER the home was built. Would you prefer that older hrms be made more attractive? I j Reason #2: The City also reels that the hoax~ is being remodeled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction of the cost of a new hone. If yay had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate unrket to buy a new home, what would you runt to do? Do you feel that people should be able to remodel their hcme97 Personally, I like the blend of different homes down here and prefer iuntington Beach's O1dTown/Townlot area to the tracts. I should also mention that in addition to makAng the home cleaner, safe, and attractive, 110 ADDITIONAL SQUARE F" rAGE, NO ADDITIQ&L UM I NO ADDITIONAL � STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROOM are being added. Omly a remodel. THIS PROPS , TIUS HOME IS ON MIE SAME. FOUND(ITION THAT IT HAS BMI ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the PLANNING QOM rSSI;ON EFAf M IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY COUNCIL CRiAMERS at ?PM. PLEASE COME and PLEASE SIGN OUR PL`I'ITION. Specifically, 'we ask your support for the eapletion of this recadeli.ng which zmkes our neighborhood more attractive and provide a better home for a+ local family. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the remodeling of the Noma at 503 Joliet, Huntington Beach, CA. �• _� �— �...t � r►r �. . !'f! _. .tip �.��� (' �!t.J!_.. .� �.�!, �. mane , addrovas •�� ��"' } �"�-'-�'t'f� tj-�,.""yu�L.J .C.ity ;`4f�;..a..,�,`�' J.�'�{,'�,�J � a;�;�.�.e�J Ll"i� „ J Thank you, Marc O'Donnell To h'untington Beach Residents and Property Owners: As a resident and property owner in this part of Nunti.ngton Beach, it was with great plewur a that I witnessed the remodeling or the old house on the North- East corner or Joliet and Indianapolis, not to tar from where we are right now. KI feelings were, "This is great, Finally this home willl, get. the facelift it needs. What a benefit to all of = who live nearby." Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing stage and that no work has been done in three months. This is because the City of Huntington Beach has stopped this project for some reasons wMch I will relate to you. Please consider what the Jmplications are. Reason 11 : By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for stucco (a change that was shoran on the blueprints rind application for permit) , the owner has came into conflict with an ordinance (.section 9552 (G) (c) ) . This particular section deals exclusively with older homes that do not met Pertain set-back requirements that were chwiged AFTER the home was built. Would you prefer that older hoaxes be mde more attractive? Reason #2: Tbn City also feels that the hors is being remodeled in excess. About $25,000 is being spent and that is a mere fraction or the cant or a new how. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out .into this real estate market to buy a new home, what would you want to do? Do you foal that people should be able to remodel their homes? Per=uil.ly, I Like the blend of different homes down. here and prefer Huntington Beach's O1dTown.'Townlot area to the tracts. I should also mx nticcl that in addition to mWdrig the home cleaner, safe, and attractive, NO ADDITIONAL SQUARE FWTAGE, NO ADDITIONAL 1RlIT, NO ADDITIONAL STORIESS, NO ADDITIONAL BEDROC M are being added. Only a rgmdel. THIS PROPEfrTIC, 111IS HOME 15 ON ME SAME FOUNDATION 17iAT IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YEARS. So, we need your help, the PLANNING COr"KI SION 1EARING IS ON AUGUST 16v 1988 , at the CITY COUt1CIL CRAMBERS at ?PM. PLEASE COME and PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION. Specifically, Iw. ask yow• support for the ecopletimn or this remodeling which makes our neighborhocad more attractive and provide a better home for a local famfly. I, the undersigned, support the completion of the modeling of ttie home at 503 Joliet, Huntington &,aeh, CA. name Thank you t 142rk O'Do mn I 9 To tfuntIngtra Pktadh Residents and Property Owner a; As a reafdent and property par irgton . p petty gamer in this t of Ifunt Beach, 31, was with great pleasure that I witnessed the r ewde ling of the old ho-me on thso Nrrth- East, corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far Prom where we are r-iqja ' now. Hy feeli were, "This is great, Pinall.y this hcoe will get the facelift it needs. %u- t a benefit to all or us whc live nearby." � Perhaps you have noticed that woric was stopped in the f s armd that P Y p�xl h framing Cage no Mork has been done in three months. This in because the City of i Huntington Beach has stopped this project for some reasons I.Mch I Will relate to you. Please consider^ what the implications are. Reason t 1 : By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for stucco (a change that was shorn on the bLweprints wid application for permit) , the owner has cow into miflict with an ordinance (:.section 9652 (b) (a) ). 'This particuLar section deals exclusively with older homes that do not met cert a n set-back requirements that were changed AFTER the home sea built. Would you prefer that older has= I)e mile more attractive? Ramon 02: The City also feels that the hoe is being remodeled in excess. About $25,000 is being agent and that is a macro fracticn or tt:e cost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older hcm or going out into this real estate market to buy a new home what would you want to do? Do you feel that le � PAP should be able to remodel their homes? Perscnally, I like the blend of different homes down here and Prefer 1hmtingWn &.-act:'s O1dTownlTownl.ot: area to the tracts, I :should also mention that in addition to asking the hoe cleaner, safe, and attractive, 110 ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE, NO AUDII-ZONAL M TT, NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO ADDITIONAL BF_DROUZ are being added. Orily a Model. 719S PROPERTY, THIS IME: IS ON 111E SAW E'OUMATI014 TIM IT HAS BEEN ON FOR OVER 50 YCARS. So, we need your help, the PLANNING CCRUMION 1EEARM IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CITY COMIL Ctt4MBERS at 7PM. PLEASE COVE and PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION. Specifically, 'we ask your support for the completion: of this remdeling wtich makes our neighboMx,,vJ more attractive ash provide a better home for a local. fam0y. I, the underaig7ed, support the completion of the remodeling of the hme at 503 Joliet untingtcn Beach, CA. ex, name a r ` Thank you, Mu* 0 Donnell To EIuntirgton Beach Residents and Property Owners: As a resident and Omer In this property part of Huntington Beach, it eras with great plea-sure that I witneased the r ewdeling of the old house on the North- East corner of Joliet and Indianapolis, not to far from iwiwre we are right now. My feelings were-, "Thin is great, fire illy this h=i will get the facelift it rweds. What a benefit to all of ua who 11ve nearby.' Perhaps you have noticed that work was stopped in the framing stage and that no worl: has been dons' in three months. This Is because the City of Huntington Beach has Stopped thin project for some reasons which I will relate to you. Please consider what the replications are. Reasm #1 : By taking off the old siding to prepare the building for stucco (a ctuiW that wa:3 stwun on the blueprints and application for permit) , the owner has comma- into conflict with an ordinance (section goy? (b) (c) ) . This particular secticm deals exclusively with older homes that do not met certain :set-bask requirements that were c fanged AFM the home was built. Would you prefer that older how-s be made core atLractive? Reason 12: The City also feels that the hone 1.3 being remodeled in c:xe w • . About S25,000 i9 being, spent arod that is a mom fraction of the Lost of a new home. If you had the option of fixing up your older home or going out into this real estate market to buy a new hcL4, what ,mould you ant to do? Do you feel that: people should be able to reel their hocaes? Per-aon;U l.y, I like the blend of different homes down here athl prefer thintb gton i3each13 O1dTownlTownl.ot: area to the tract.3. 14hculd al a m enti.co that in addition to eking the home :leaner, 3a,.fe, and attractive, NO 0DITI0NAL SQUARE F00UGF, NO ADDITIONAL (MIT, NO ADDITIONAL STORIES, NO AMXTIONAL BEDIMCMS are being added. Only a remodel. THIS PROPS 1TY, MELS 1KM IS ON THE ;i FOWIDMON T MT rr HAS BEn OIt mi ovu 56 muts. So, need yol.ir help, the PLANNING GY!`4 SSltNl HE1 RM IS ON AUGUST 16, 1988 at the CI'I Y CLWCIL LIMBERS at 7PM. PLF.Af1E CCM and PL IMM SIGH MR Purrr ON. Specifically, w-.-- ask your support for the coepl eti can of this re=xieling Ni ich maces ow^ neiefiborN.xA mom at:ta-active and provide a better tc for ,a local family. I, the undersigned, support the ceopletion of -be r emcxieling of the home at '503'Joliet, Huntington Deach, CA. ee name aWresa X 01, L Thank you, Irk O'Donnell L Jr ',;, ?'y �� ♦t"� • � �. �r1rf�Cva,.+4sJ d�i�_w+.�•7 ` �� ^++.• , 3Y 'i • ♦ *• i i • y^',`�� •• "• i�'. p. 5,. .� Mr.� OL! ' S,.�n � ! �,ta- I 4'L, �N��.l w r♦•. �.a i,tti L ,„ . rT ,1r�'�1�► ♦'►1.. •• I'�ti�.,r�+�1{ ` gl.t� ,/�". •i.y, i ,� ♦,_ �.F � • 'i�-� s -..rj�'�,•1„f �i3 • ��+�y.. '' '� 'Iu 7 »y� t�r!'�,t)�,,•�`.'!«�'".'� ' y`' •r� 'i � Xa' ^!C' -a ` , � �, . • ' ITEM.�C�.g , ����� F• �; d� '•,.T:"tx„'i:j� rA ,�.��•. �:�•. 1 � .'3 !iit�:� !., �L,`�r�if��'i.�•;��j�+•`���1 � L"'r �'r�'ji��=S*�'..•��.y� + '�,��.r !•�"1 1 i Y bf}� . ftr{w.• r••�'�r ' it 1 r . � " Ail •f, 1rY :S �'1 • h. iris ?. A •, CTION FOR � ►. ALTERNAT -VE A PP�Q V 4 •t r. CONDITIONAL USE VERMIT NO 88--31 FINDINVS �QR APPRQVAL : 1 . The proposal to rehabilitate an existing single family dwelling is consistent with the goals and objectives of the city' s General Plan and Land Use Map because the site is designated Idedium Density Residential . 2 . The location, site layottt , and design of the proposed use properly adapts the proposed structures to streets, driveways , and 'other adjacent structures and uses in a harmonious manner . 3 . The applicant is i.c't proposing to add floor area or increase the number of stories . CONDI:•XQN$ OF APIIROVAL : 1 . The site plan , floor pla s and elevations received and dated July 15 , 2988 , shall be r`nod-i-f-iod--Lo--shose--t:-he--ex4sti-ng-'bu -l-ding e#--vra•�--anci-•-eo•rzi��r---eut--of€•;--erd- confo*mi-ng•--w•Ythr f rant•-a nd-ext:er io'r--s-i'de--ye-rd-setback$-. 2 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant shall Eile a parcel reap or parcel n-ap waiver request to consolidate portions of Lots 19 and 20 , Block 1005, of Vista Del Mar Tract: . The parcel map or plat map and notice shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder and a copy of the recorded map or plat filed with the Department of Community Development prior to final inspection or occupancy. a 3 . Prior to issuance of building permits , the applicant shall submit the following plans : a . Landscape and irrigation plan to the Department of Community Development and Public Works for review and approval . 4 . Installation of required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be completed prior to final inspection . 5 , All building spoils , such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material , shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. +6 . Low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water Faucets . ♦ r .. .Y ,• .s i i Y w t , i r r f r - 17 I t is i ,� _ � F •, ! r `fit {r.°:'� � F t+`;r` i••'�i'��+1 � Z'ar= 1 ���"r y'►,,•�'�, \ II•, \7•,�.:; w ,`,,.tee �•.s•' f y.�.,•t. Y�r�,;,i r ,.t1 o%y.�� ��AM P tPrioi to NIsuanc�„Iof Abui peraait ' e ra ark a�cnar aigii �'o+�ari'sa 'I'and zecord .i+ith 'tho�Co . 'jP P Y ,.�,ahsLl , °. ugqly Recorder -' of �►grebment assuring that ;tho •`single `Emily .residence 11i11 %be "'•;'Y' F , r= maintained as one (1) dwelling unit . S. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits . 9 . The development shall comply with all applicable -provisions of the ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department except as otherwise approved by the btt,S,I G { 10 . The applicant shall meet all applicable Local, State, and Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards . 11 . Landscaping shall comply with Articles 913 and 960 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code , I� . 'i1tie., cam' S.�•-� 1 cc•o 4�,�c-- 1n V,. O+ ' Y' temo cl,-ng OUU 6 &,q CZALA�4- r ' { • w .� 1 sir J 4 1 I. it ''�.. a 1 l. , 1• �� t; h � s {~ .` • t Y• I. '` , s r �iil it .� 1 r.. '1•. • /F .I•jln.�.1 f i •� ~ - r � ' •,r� N+ � •r 6,' ,i 4 / .�. }._ a ��..••.\.. r .�:, 1 �"{l�i 1 t t)l• r .iw:•,. •1'•\ � i� ~I v _ •ti` ..I h 1 f ;r A •..z.Y'`' �'�- i • ,? a I.f^.'•-�' ,t•.♦ t..� Iw. y 4" M r,�. .1•I �!;r L•>,lrl i �.wrr . L Ri 14L�,,� t.,� r .. ` ';, � r :';R.lr .� L4".k fr.!�i-+^�`y' •;o,+w.��:' r� rr. -r y'�rr r'\�' 1� .1►I . tA .1 r S.t•,.�.•it• f:i � •� y� 1�♦N.-.` ,i� �: v ti • .l� t r Q� +• � y r / r .,,, t Irk 1 !.1 I l�y �' r. •r l ,♦ I •s`, f 'v � .R!'� �; / _ � i� • i!"r�-y �� • �'•: \ 1 Y•.�. {; y� ,` r ♦ � � 1 zl ;�l ti:•, i\, L:4't✓1"i!'�♦ i �w�v Y •t.. i:�, s� '..,+� r �'�.+ ` 'r / '351s• � .r �jl, y. •• ,. If ♦� +-••y► r 1 ^{,,�. / trI-'J ;.• !1' .* �«ar ��A., I:j • , •.,. ? tee', X.t' K. .,. '., • r, ,JA'µre _ 1 ish �-- r , �.. I'�OTI�_OF pUi�?.7C H -�°►RItdC J APPEAL TO KANNING C"TSS�N -DLf 'Ur CONDITIONAL USE"PERW17 t M-s1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEA'�" ia -�fie`"f�un xng anOEM City Council will hold a' public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic . Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California , on the k date .and at the 'time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who 'wish to be heard relative to the application described below, p$TZs Monday, September 19 , 1988 T1 7 : 00 PM 51W.J=: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Denial of Conditional Use Permit No . 88-31 APPUCANT: Mark F. O'Donnell Rog-rs S Hartley, Attys .s . f, on behalf o Mark, F . � ..�: O ' Donnell AT101J: 503 Joliet Avenue (Northeast corner of Joliet Avenue and Delaware Street ) PRQ &L: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s denial of a request to permit exterior alteration to an existing single family dwelling that is non-conforming with regard to setbacks, parking, and building separation. EN'VIROh The proposed project is exempt Class I Section 15301 and Class 5 Section 15305 from the provisions of California Environmental Quality Act . 4N FILE: A copy of the proposed project and appeal are on file in the Department of. Community Development 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92648 .- AhL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the rppli.cation as outlined above. All applications, exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office: of the City Clerk, 2008 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California , for inspection by the public . HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Connie Brockway City Clerk Y Phone (714 ) 536-5404 R, Dated t ( 1150d-2) .. • ypF}, 7 f 0/-G1 �- 025-167-:15 EUdet "H XWeA 'WC.%am J Colamat Noo.w X Shaotian " JOLT E tata►td St ;. 010 Vc. maLid St 904 1.71,,CatMad S '~Kwit�i zott cactt, Ca. 92641 Hatt"Ung.ton Beach, CA. M41f Huntbiaton Beach Ca. 4264t OY5�161-03 d25- 167- t6 ,a,, 1.OuL,SC a• Incope.M R.udcr y l!anhcun 1005:-EnjtAnd 'st 1012 Vr-U Ad Sr Hu►iw9ton Seach, Ca. 92649 fftmanyton Beach, Ca. 92648 025- 1b7�A 025-768-01 Y Nam to L C'took Ro,ut4:d T Wootton, 950 'S C4naga St 18112 Mc►t tircCC Ceti Attalacm' Ca. 92804 Nu+t~'ina:cn Beach, Ca. 92647 i . 025-167-07 c?25- 1G6•t�Y C es k Uitgvt 41 BYooh„s 8442 Sptbighuts.t Ave 2804 Ruaf Rd Sa.;.tc 5 . Htintx9tolt Beach, . Ca. 91.546 Pta:to, Tx 75705 025-161-08 025. 16S-03 KclmetJt Pt:ant et►ctim Mr- Beth 507 Jo.f ct Ave- 7Y5 6- vUtpe, St Hum Wig to►s beach, CA. v'2646 Ft CoCcbut , Co. sC5f 1 `025-167-09 025- 16 - na Ai-,,-y E l:w: Robe-t Lee c%mw 2407 Scu ice, Rd 905 Cnat'and CCAa, Ca. 95W Hur4tinaten reach, C,... 9;:64s � 0.25- 167-10 04,- 165-05 Ma".-y bjet�1t 1"{,mi �C�Ct1: SQLtl: t'J 1407 Sewi-ce Rd 9618 kobut A-;c CcAaf CA. 95307 Va.t_tev, ca. 9 7Qe 04S- 1b1- 11 D:,S- 1o5-4a 11 SaltdUil filuccc J £-.Lta .101 1 Eng Land St ►1pC C 918 Dc.!'r =tdd St Htuttirtg ton ge4ch, Ca. 92741 tlur.tutgtnr. Bvch, ('A. 92648 025- 167-12 ors- rbs-o, JA)z V Sande,% Nalat,ic A Kotscl: 101.5 MA P„5cm:d St A 7 t h s� N4ntingtalt Beach, CA. 926ML MoluAgto►t seach, ca.. 92a48 025- 167-13 Q25• J�,d�Q� 7anieZ C Gi.•f l:i Se c wistr G-odine: t01 a ; Vetmomd St 9250 dra tell. bi lurLt�.ngtoti Sc�acit, Ca. 9�646 t'aRana,' Ca. 91720"- ti, '025-168-09 �ina:et C Ric,hmd t zy6 a a I X :Ve44 t.2d St 1605 Cattt&.a Ave Iurit«�g.ttrn 8cacf; ! ca. gbd8 Serr,t :#lesefs, {.'A. y0740 -} ;s,i �11' `�.,�i�urr 4 _ `T',a2rr '1t-G��lj•.*�'1'i'dS1.t4rsEss+ww.H ^-«tycy�tr* ,4y��i«v �U i�l.s.w-+* ... ._� _. ."- _'� -,•J25- l Qt- 16 ' . i • 025- 104.-a1 025-1U� 1S Richa,%d-l ' ZytAt,%a �:. No^►maul S Kunoi he ,.1605T. .#at,Cita Ave 420 Jottr-t Ave 91/ vetmaud St SBa,C 5eacJt, Ca. 90740 tluottigto►t Beach, CA. 926E4 Hu,cti,tctta,i BC ch, Ck. 9264a 025-103-01 025- 1 Oa-D.i Q25- 1C�4-19 , Gory ` niunk S t miz SU,%tcy Fc tausoot r�.cft tc! Kt:t t t 1019 Dc ec mtd- St 909 vefuWattr St 1556b Graham • ,.Huntington Beach, CA. 92648 Hu►tti.ngtct: BcaC►t, CA. 92648 HunUA4ta,t Biajn, CA. 9t6.17 025- 103-02 025- 104-04 02ti- 163-)0 F Lotub >=a�t.trtbaugh Kev<.,t J Kc►ttcet thvid T Fc,irett 16156 Tontota Ut 905 Uc- mcu.•,d St 6731 Hab.bo- Kea C.i�t ffu►t.tington Beach, Ca. 9Z649 ffu►ttulatQot beach, Ca. 92646 lftuttbytn,t Brach, CA. 9[64e 0,25- 103-03 025- 104-05 025-163-1 Donna lit Lebme ttor.,tua. Lcutise Scctc� �1 kvlk tl.icto►• Hamsert 20051 beaumvitt C4.. �1tactbur.,; Ra - (If' 321 k 23:d St NetmWig.tort beach, Ca. 92646 SetFti:k, Nu 171Ss yyy�' Cnsr�; ur-Sal CA, 9Z626 025- 103-05 Ca&t A Kt ttut RtiL:ct 3.' StCs�u",ti Rcmazed A vw i:C'. I 410 Kiww ''-ftlCe Ave 3, 3Q N Ysabet 100Y biotr►,d St Hu,ttt.,tgton beach. Cart. 92645 RasCrcad, CA. U_7 7V. N mtijl.3 011 Uac}t, CA. 9?648 i 025-103-06 0 5- 1C-4-OS c�?S- lhS- 1S kc uxttd s Plt.c,C.tcp.s At crs4, papdeds J.Z RL-.tact P sic !�utu 12042 Otmic St ko%etaC Dr-Uvc-:u 101 F,tata,td St Ga.:deet Glxvc, Ca. 926s0 Sur:set Seely. Ca. 9074 Hu►:tbijtet; buch;l CA. 9Z64t 025- 103-07 0t - 14s- icy 0;�- J63-19 Ranatd J &ee,ttier: Bvc.~e,tt t{ Vieko ' Jamu 1 dtrta%hmaot 2872 Montacu Ave 906 1010 fo:gCa,:d Avc Costa l(cba, CA. 9 626 ffuwt-ilwtol: Scctcrt, Gt. Huotttrta•tim Beach, CA. ' 916;1 025-103-09 0117- 104- 12 i►:5-ics• 1S Nancy Wt i.c Shv-w-it Wi::r A He bres Joseph S Stock 1002 CaP.c�o�,tia S� 1E5 b Fatr.sm<.ut A<<c 5375 F Horecr-wed Lot rfuntingtAm beach, C• 9r641 Gatd�.):r, 'CA. 90iJ4 A,uikiem, CA. 91-7407 .025. 103- 13 01675- J04- 14 0?5- 164- 16 8 C Gww Haut P. Ncil S-tephc,t P ;im%vC,,t 1001 DetatuL%d St 12422 P-ble, St Y20 tit Wild St Hwtt bta,tcot Beach, CA. 9?64S Gtov:, Ca. 9?640 Nurtuta tort Buick, Ca. V2641 " - Qi5 025 164- 17 '-.103-i4 025- l04- Jn • r Wa,tcfa A Wood Hans peJ�'+t9 Jr►►ut 1: f,ii�►i't 1005 Debut to St 910 CaziAouid -fit 91d bintartd St � Hcut tc,s gzan hcach, Ca. 941 Hur:.Wigto,: beach, CA- 4:b�f1 Nujstt,tAtort Beacltr Cu, 9254E t?75-103- J5 025-'10:-17 025-166-13 .{ Lyle F 1on r ' Gait C1tar..trs. P SavZ¢ h,t{lto�su C Flc+UttotrfC« �, 1 X 1 SS Aj Wk- Ct•, 911 Ca.Ujo.tnca St 3635 hctpctLC Ave Fotut.taut Vattruf Ca. 92708 Ifunttngtor. Suchi, CA. 92648P ei;Ktuc.3a. t' 4f16A1 rok ST 'Ublish _ NITRE of FOLIC-11EARING APPEAL TO PLANNING COK4ISSION DENIAL DF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-31 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIg£t�T'�EFaf�'1ie'"Aun ng on'"`IIeacfi` Ciky` Council will hold a" public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California , on the `date and at, the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. PIKE: Monday, September 19 , 1988 T 1 7 : 0 0 PM SIIBJFCT: Appeal of Planning Commission 's Denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 88--31 i MUM Mark F. O 'Donnell } A22YLVim: Rogers & Hartley, Attys . , on behalf of Mark F. } O ' Donnell LQCATiON: 503 Joliet Avenue (Vortheast corner o Joliet Avenue and Delaware Street) MWEAL: Appeal of Planning Cor=issionos denial of a request to permit exterior alteration to an existing single family dwelling that is non-conforming with regard e to setbacks, parking, and building separation. NYIRQ �t'i'. STAx'US: The proposed project is exempt Class I Section 15301 and Class 5 Section 15305 from the provisions of California Environmental Quality Act . A copy of the proposed project and appeal are on r file in the Department of Community Development t< 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach , CA 92648 . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. All application.:, exhibits , and descriptions of , this proposal are on file with the Off ice of the Cl ty Clerk, 2100 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California , for inspectVn by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Connie Brockway s. City Clerk Phone '{714 }. 535-5404 Dated 1150d-2� yj Publish : NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CODE XIVIDMEL IT 88•-B TEMPORARY USES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach , California , on the date and at the time Indicated below to receive and consider the statement of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. DA IME: Monday, September 19 , 1988, 7 : 00 PM APP�.Z. TI.911 -KUP-Inn : Code Amendment No . 88-8 c3 1.r�.8JJT: City of Huntington Beach - AREA INVOLVED: CITY-HIO£ RE ST: To amend Section 9101 of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code to allow specific temporary uses within the Residential Agriculture (RA) district subject to conditional use permit , and to amend Section 9510 . 15 . 1 to allow temporary recreational vehicle storage within the Restricted Manufacturing District (rtl-A) subject to conditional use permit . tt'tIIRQN NIAL-51 U-5: Categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Evir.onmental Quality Act . i ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above . All applications , exhibits , and descriptions of this proposal are an file with the Office of the City Clerk, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Leach , California, for inspection by the public . HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: Connie Brockway City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 t • a c r f t, r CREATE A FI LI (35 characters grid) �D Q nt1LY.0 nit e _ MApLc4- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 i E AFTER FILE FOLDER IS CWPLETED, CHECK HERE: L RETURN THIS FORH TO EVELYN! 0895I i t �S4f. { E k • . 1, gucjust 19 1988 To 1hon. It '!au Concern: I , Bob Reynolds , 3.ived at 503 Joliet, HuntinSton 3each for ove", one year.'prior to rehruar.� 1388 ��hen I m oved� My w rasi'dency. there can be `confir�Pc' by both the electric and gas cor..pany as well as the prone conpaay . n05 Reynolds i ; ; I e. if �• ��� 'S�+�y�y . - r ( l _. tY _ i� t l_.1�L-1LJ I�. 111 til '1 A t t N! 3 ` _ �• - • ulu>a - 5c2._.. . riµ'•. f 111 ti I C� -O ' Mtwa 1.. •c i• . ON A! AI RI AI ? I .1 _ MSEAEft AI NI NI N! 1 NI Ns -O t .... -•I ��Nt� •.�- • Q J Yor -01 t• Op / Nl NI N1. .• ♦. w•.1 1 w � •'�::_. ..�` Rt zap— t tyA.�DTr EC►fiC 1 �,•I�b : { .-. �_... .. ! AI at • I..r -Q% i"V1N+E.� ' fR1CT TY�K�) ' "A6 "i ii 1 i Rt CF—H j �_ _M;�CF 14 1 , ! •q Al •M, t l- .J — "_ — . ; N) c, ,t �1. 1J Ur i ,}its �Il 1 at RI fit i w �`•4.1 _ 1IC 2 AI Ic + !IS ti! t►S La 1 J .. '3 �' + teat 1 l_ N 1" RI Rl ft ml V �•j I t RI Lu fee c j 1 --� ll CF-E �f 2 it ni to i NUNTINGTOH BEACH :OLANNING DIVISION : Y .. i'•1rtC?'s►y.+y1y,y,'1•� �q�err�,c'�'Y'M 2� o�.t'+i•tiro�a•v i S, -all 6 %rw -mq WAUO•lbCx V=FWL, to I .ur T&Quwr ry%aa "*rry • ti4►r'tT 1a�'t�•T«t1 wy„�at l"vh1 7w«••,.fit '�.•� =Inc= %'.M try htwsaw ' . k�.w'tleS� xxkc'r� • -En 1 'Ltae��4! �l'.�Jtid K; t 1 y MOM% r . f4Y S 0 it .. • t i ,1 Y 4` x ; PO j s " ..A ' • mtiRT i • 1tt1►iC�'I O loop do • �� L1rAfi1(QOM ;� �DIiW i • 4I� .•� 0 ;i-, M 1- yI V'dcft&= KVA►»atK pwtat]7N vtg&%*Mobal • A R'�+C %Akd%h VLA fmabn Alb 'la+mr ?%OFltttW AtlOM741 901 JOCAT 1 (bpZ.DCLA--S& Q6lE"L* %P%GIiP 1nW.b. 0,46b VOAKO R. ' 1R1�tlMii'Cq�1�LV.G%,t& C 4004 V1 boas UtV+r►%&Zd. UJM TAA4 Lq Lt44% C1LSC7%Vrc It 1•r, X �0`yC.:Kltf► tll,arR 4lis t�L Vt'M �1i0uy%ft-mx P�x� 'um ���.+.� wt��,11ttKS�'llri►:z+�,� Ro�M � �.►.%Mbh%CAI cis 10•cc+ .�Narwx�a..A.oayL .wTM M�,�wrwr► �ea+s 0 CR tit. t�N ,Es c lk► �Wrt.��+a�VtK. vav*o wft1. DUAIOsxt StuCCI C.� .yr• T• T..: P.•V�' �# R7� wR1t 4YMM Ciw►xbiA/0� Y�M34.R�C ►.. • —..-.-.,....__-�..—`_-..,r.....•..—�-�...•�v...�•.....r-...;.ifrf....'.h.c:.r�Y'r TJI•R'%21•.'ar.!.!}/.i'.Yr�.lti•G1M,s:1 Y/wY7A�� ►`. T; N •,, u r CA.Cm[r M �.,,,, }per►{ • (iJC1t'ivtl EXISTkik3f. ROCS �t�raG.WO Rk �,YiC'. �wOt>X�.. ►�OIvSt1� ALZI'�.►►T10FI+j pW�1£rij KC1tR, ttMCl il�+�t WS1R.wrL� No ►+a0 Ste. "Wo!� ft %Vw.%%rm ��tsrtltlV R aoat"s'�.� 01 sr."Im i too?. sty"Ql' %JV.4Li.�.n++.ct+++►�tva'•uJ wrty ►.xw ritJM.�t. ►kA4V M44•CAC.,A.tA%Ull S A CAX044%I* %Ocg C1Wwvu� twAt OAAP M4 OPn&?G A• m Pu[rMNIE. UlU" tftUX%PT%A,% Si;,T Iti, %LOCK. IOaQ.V*Th t&-Mk% �OL..D+�G lu�M t.lO.U1�1iK[riaaQ„ TRI"CZ l�b+.3"a at�+e4�•1►m►S. tJa�a�atiY l�cl.+1 - w,l, ►JurAKJIS OScs•►�4•10 �l >; i.y►+1�41•n WM4 WA3ftt% *1updt* 'wot1A'?lV Wy "aJ C�u1.Ki. 111 t Rw3►w. ws++► `fi S+�t: C� llama Sib--OWL& 1,�s►}.+hbl. dtRAw�1►C 7�til�C't alsr�.�.m�tPu�w ewO 11�rsnyG Avow s4lrww� a1 Rcaao+ wrsti. �.>rt+4 c+�-R7c�sct�oa•.r.;,Ocus. rA ww � ltbcab l�rttat:0�!� , r i ( • . V�d� �� L•,`r`. Ip•,0• • `�;� ,thy• �.�• _•�+,� . + .� '� a T •.` •• L'N.� S'•$ Lo— Lwi Un C sArm ja cxowll • r 1•�•• is � • 1 ♦ 1P6 .,.. , �rtOo+� �� it �d9tCAM S i • �� 1 i0'•O" � t iu CtrCls!'T.�• 1 t ii �'�,•1. �� _1•�-c �c,,.r.._z�..i� G ..�`L..r- .�:,�. f. � �•c a a. .wo L . 'rt4•t r�..•r' fir• + a ,. � .,' / '' �`• 1•NC• r• :�1 w �•!if A4R►•OV L ( Q w « .r � .. w..• r � w r •• •. r .• � � .� w r w. .n w « � w v. r •• �. w ,� .w � r r �. w w �. r .. .. ��. � ,,.. P�ELt�a�i•oo�.. v�...•�wJY ryr,.w..w� ��►••�.t+�wn ' owwt�s aR0.. 1+L�w q u,.w+x..a..iJxrtta,� Lo►��aCaws 1'�G17i7Ct�) u:w�rs l aas '+ts~.tC�T ! �aoi atr.�aw�t U t� �,aw k'0.4 nwr�..ad '+e'llrt Nw.7�twi'li�•.l T�[I�i�Ci �t+••tl i �1p t/r•�l.M�tK N!>a• epC 1t1• fyt-Our 1b0 5•V�1R7.t�4 y+►nt 1 .,.�.•.�:.c......�•r.—.�..-.,azW .+..,,.. - �.c;;rrr,+niew••nrw�sc�:�a+•::-,;�t�frwca .-,........ _._r. .. tl�� t •r'•�r,�• •r�•,r,FOr.r.r�l.• •S i . r ~'� �• Z•��`r 10�'¢r ���` L%Y• spa+ �•,�r � ;. Mr Ltd V•'!11 eue 94 t y >p�scwu► �� Y Hta%cAM � • vw Vs►�LC� IS `��.t�•�,,.7,� a•G, to •� sl•a11 ••�r «) In y r 1'• 7 .'�',� «• .0 .:+ i � '/ •tom � 1 � a r ti n N N — — •► — — N r F •r A — — — M .• Y — M r r r — — F — — — .. j W. I i»- cuRe xt-- p,.asttn>�trraoea. ca�...as ►�ore►�,,,� �wtorr�t Q,.♦.tl�l1 a1Rll. tayW Il u.[h•a yr 4nit.���.M 4a.iA�'>f►.td�o.I ' TMctRtY l.Ci�1•i�is a0>•3[t6siT ! It�lt t�a.�aW►.it �tf�L�l� k.•O�tr r1L+RMeYL• Ar"� • M1t3�W�T`.�t MAGI {A h Zv.trwWl t�.Al.?�1711•M't 1 pN� � N♦ !y►�IC�C/. 10Q'�i�vHl1,tae•3•w•� �` It l�R + �!l11: 02lS.ilNO 'I ".+.'i�►.Y r.:•,•uv....••�.Iti.../` ,. L�1i�►�::�i 1�N1bd1'� '' 'r"„r-'� - 4YM*NrK';K��I•�•WiWi�� :. .� , Itif i&MGNi`10fty 1L ,1rJi'Iir�L 11iLl.i�w►',.=•iy t�{�IIJ A1fU4M lb"64 &OW .Tr AP6 4 -�• IiA rtiiAMVMi11� �,_ ..' . ++i T�,c�♦�/' 'A.1� ' 11i,� �.�1 WtJ�Nfi� �HT•'tiMM•i 'wnM �r•1�TIr1aL,�wrn1' � :� MiA !l�4�IIfT rMfi/,iK J♦Z iWhaK/ t li*.i W-m 1H 1.1M1L f•+K 4�its � �1•K tir'11�► to► %14� Woo-Lao ` K/G♦ WMOIE,11�•awb 't :►M.+'lay.�f .Vy.1wv . x • hlyd•lilW�C�*1.7K ;,; �R+j/4rR MNw.tMr� >,r1�IL+•1>ril x,'ii'•YMRr11+i ;; nww�.,....,� •w•Iwwr• "i tor.SGWM L row VWMXAMltJt t 1 . -V cuour 1 l` 1 11.0 �• �+ •�t L•:rrl�. 1'.p• y o' , '.a 166 1 .•� �., q�,p�� i ,n. , �. q'•C• �� C�Ai•t:T Ctt7ra 1 it ,R..a. •. • w.•I ( Q ( iL�•.,ytp••1'•0` }'•N'A'•tY L••i• 4'•L' �'•fr' Ufq ! . t tS1131►J; AMA 1 l � i o t i►waOrCh uNl. J « � _. w � .. r w � r w r r .. � � .. r r r w r w.w r w r r r r w r r � _. e r r .. •_ � r 1 ...._._._.+ram... � CUMS 2�•-• �I�TI 'R�GL7a. AO.�wI►!t 1',OR1►r I/w�'\twaRy.IrT, O+l�13�,1 I>1Z3�, MRiW 1�I.L&^64 n%wp4.LL%a%, . �►.»oe11JLTICw1 1•tQ1�4"I I b,% •4%LCT ! IOOL %Z46"AAL 4rt* "%3 MVcot VS^64 (, Af•w^ NV.r"A4" UAC61,U• •4tL411 >7 04JAZ~. %PO%W*HTLV ♦M3&W tWb t�i.�4.tlf.•f,t:Ilp•t 10wL kSS 19 O�CeA .nO S,VIM►,Ski.V IuK %4L tI W rl► st%ktl►Tft l 't'UK1' Qp,'1r11�T���OL/r.� W 11M p„1tC_r1.�tAc. 1A,1D Rr1iA'1�MJb �•..S ....M...�.5'.TiVDV['i:+��.-�.•YN�.'.-r;.i�.wr..:ay.varo-..a�ril`-`��.\"..\l�ri:n•:u �nl.w r.l„lY.ia.a++�a.... . ..........�.�.� _�. �� _ _ _. 1 t:11 pt yi. �nbtAl RJo,I►�t10U %MC !Ie�tCiL1.=%AcT tii6 t•o�.ao G•.p+DSKi .rs /a rou^sxj PAX r Ib� Mwwt o►I moa m o ft6r 1; • 0. ' ttOu� Itr'.O.C• urtM.x•or�c o� t'�•t" 11.'QL `q j s•.ti• r1VAt..rn � ,;. � txt9'�sC a.,L. twl+zli►�.r> U Im k .„ w.Aj1^•o4c9m 0/1111Atf. QA�fr9CwR11�Y.+t� 190311 MM rat( rL V%A*R ADW% ' W rrl R•+• c�+c y,,c+attf ', � �.►+�'t'ti �t ..�w►a�t[V w+n+rA.�q CueTb+te , et,ivt►tIW•atOK wtSit� tVbwws�l'Ou� � *tLf�T��L+wOio1Z O►,�.+tR+ w�� wwt� Tooval414 "&gags 1 4w S JQIAR7, tom tit "AV - ' • ' �'ML.t�[S•ly tur�Ct �►�11MN41 � � � { Z•l�i"L�O�?1LaYr ' � 7{�1Ri, J r Al e r � ��1�LOC�CIJ>AYs Z rjcw vaup� 1 1 Owl tUttSTWG iIGCl�.lk1G!! �i 1.�` wALAP "tAwVWO" W,rA mtksR"kftV tgncwd CVWr 4 s.ax 1 CA&9-CDP" i )i w.w++xn m %a va, !Z OIL%Cvk 4 two T ut.tIJ W46 ry V x camwop" W .'Revel �W. nC�Da1ZD 6e "UAUL* 2,rL' • L'.`' ZA4D c&qr- ♦'p'�t'O" •%1 D►vwm to"s. -I* m %Cutu C 4 4"Pot[ t'Mlltw� arn'•tx1C QbJ►1► �b"a !'•o• K,S••�++wi� �' ?ac, ttae�qer*oe+ct. % I�i�t�l 3 TO TtA ►�iuount.c rV' . s.'.�r wcuaa taw_ t�.JJc w tyy► : . t . J" %ASMv b-10 fit,t mw %.xft 0.ryw KAAV r %Xi 9004?'Lan as %4#M Ilk 4'• tea j�lo�pla0►1 J �! Ya9t..Crt/Ii�Q1 O4l�J�Kit• 'ii.' Lrt• NQ ftA CC*L ItA�+r.+iyM tuRW►t �0wJ1#W I" 34 /-4Cf.1 0%C•1 MCA A" •� 1*A �.01 ow#=skn5 toeft 1Q4 WMA04CROWS ta?�,+{, C�L.IOr•'Lt7*1� Ipt M•�M.dtJiC �ae>r�, � RI.Ol74D 't'^*'♦ 1.•4' '1 aUs'. A.Q. • .pifr•�t.t-♦O �'��iWraD�Jylt bccMo► •- ' «J����n trbJVNQ4 �� Iles �.•{�• �' , ►�- NTING""CON BEACH 2000 MAIN ST, cEtMta+► n o HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92641-M •�' P.V.SOX IN-UUMMIA tuft Jfitt AOAre1e t1Mo.iueab t Mr q . Aa1Ka1+�11 4 ;. jot T. 1: Tmct Na Lot ma. stout Na WWI raft? =O moo 1►LS� hp� nor Nam! Nue+Oer , AgArtati fuel ift7�l.tl..N0.Sitlrt•VhLGitY.S4tl. 01 �• Zqo7 tr+tt;tora c4ry L,earsl 4 Numper weeor t sass ueenss Nimoa? YEV: mace k' frM�41tCIf1Q� 8WtQ1e+S t.lsags -. P,to+lc$+0*7 Sm n,Unrq . 54,tl UnKa vs+uatr�rt t Nss.Stonrrs Na f ertu+.es Bs�.Cxt: t NEB = ADD_ ATM," nELOCA71 VEMOWN'= REPAIR= Destts9t►orc,,, -'\e?.CY!s = ti_ 1ti a�.' Cr�i.� .sf C: �� t t`�mul \ LL a,A •y[ t • R i Al Y.• - 1�� •�'�^�•��;1 \ / ,..:.,r.+:w�,; 1� . �:• 1:'t \••f1 1 4.,n P� '�11 1 1 L� t ...:1- .�.r /. ' AtCtvtoC'1 Nave . /� F't+Of'•o NturttiMt ; � r �.i �11�`.iLrL`/1/! i�Lr �1S► i w •��� ` L��,,.�,1 �•� •r.Stii �w•�� , ���'�"t �~ ^'- �'��' �++••� f ' Art„ttfiKt Aocrest s�ast wfetoleutY=�.e_Ko•5ustL tht t�+tr,Sure. p� . - ' : G•� Lt �,L..'•'�•-�� v ✓�':`.:.''� fw � ^+ � •tom Ares,taa State Ll"11111 hun=er ' "4— CmeMli �?..."L�:L.�' Nr� ' Gr +•t +f•• ''r,� y' -.i.- n Lv ��"�, J !hr w"�/v. orr - .L-�i�•r►ti.-tt./s,Ls� ILI e l!:; cu1. _ �'T�"�� r `1..:-•� - Os« Group CoAsu.Type Gte.Lwa • nq L.0�� �� � . Census Cone 6409 usage ye. Pusu+q 5:�ates IMPORTANT f.nnuirMwom No. Coastal Perrnft za^e IVES—. NO: t.Ptusa see re•enft 241 !r l"N;7Mt lnlyfryI pn taro Use•ApW.By Qate 4 2. i°tt3"flu' in fit ue�s CoR010491r elcYr1 dw3N a►sr.,$, AVttxar4ied am BUIL13ING PERMIT I~ G M PC A0�►. rule. .ACa�L1 e Irc Kx Pawr Y 30 hsua�!11 Dare leave f+eCe•pt r ,...._,...... , .�...�.. �- .. .... . 1y.IM•wM•MylMMY. ..n . ♦ ..l.r .C.Iww�... � -•--.� _.-_ __ _ , r - , r 1 r i i f g 0 wwt.� oOqAcaa. oc so% mwm o�►k+wt x we".rw�N t��+►1s�r�� 1M�R1►�1."N�o1 fty"tSy►'��L+�1 Q 2&401 *094%ofAtim UP x.m..vabcv►nw1 Lay 14%, UAW-&was,Qvu* %a. *AOA CA ,4•�oiR•Kr1•Ki -� 'i'RA�t1t1� iaG �t'1 •. 1►�b1.�.V NYari.\rC�.�G.A t�tJfA � 4"tJ�/3'L�J1wY6 �kAfUSL�"i�1C�1/ML ...........,...�j ►i�R4 t vrs*7t►r•�eti. Iot�rG ' A,P•+ It.'1-so •wo rl.R,LA Aii41•44�Mt , t�'l.�I Z''a• 'fL'K� 1r1�•��OM t�V•�=�.0. !•+.+0�v1rH � } O►rfJ ut /tiyM��.x!� �i wsk� � �� � ' r LO U%q o:, vai+ • ,e fi u 11 N ��` tr�uibw•i � - 4-1 �aicu.t� �� �n�►oot� ,I bLer 1 VC, S C4��IRtVr.p .,•r. .p '!`h` `�ri�o .:. y'- t�tr• N Y wrrG• L'1 Wy M Vit— • � A Z O �. • Zo t a.n• .r w.w •... w.r r �� .'L.ate'r•��c•�1x Tat11' & it •.+ir.�w•. .w" �t �,•a. g,,a, c� Ct.�d � `,., p�rrx.�araaw.. w>�rs r•csw�w t+•rtitiowt�+ra C++04xR% till. V4&" 11 CLAC0,64%W r..IQA%Iw. eaMI%*4 w.j W.mX9 L=•: "AO4,CA az,r.t a ►weM+►+Is vwsw-Sgl .Y ma%r Mso t►.t G►bcyyaf3/.��.wt►>i K, with. �71l��I+MNOdwM I;L'1v t'a* ',V{' �M Yl s1VcLn R7rltlot, t �, ,I ,) a MWA ka Uwe, NA Carro�ca ' f�X1�T1Nf. P;+Of r,.r 4 r 4rw+ ♦./ �� err.■. ,.ram. ���� - t • 1'b w • t 0 r vassar� towaa�. s�a•►e•s+� uto��noM, tpr�D1� KOA,ruw A NEB wtiicaml Moo= awk"SAA*.+4t fa %kmK^mm poor"m P M%W.i so► M&Av!root mLk-W►,c ti�09 411 Shh"&U*&&crOM*=44 4snK +ems VOAOa*g, "L4%t%,a'%WM A t �sp *op! /M1►iR- it IrD�ntyi A., 14t7"MM+Mt. ma c.aa�oR�rt+t�J: 101 r1,%UD(A VWC,WW%M%^A o4a%lMuuWt.l."*AL w,r,uvh�+twi O�L�•�1.1•�a �)�xx�t t,a.nAo►.aR wcTw iK,�.►w�w►kaeDe� . 1�W 1WIJ+Z 4.KlM w►f kh^" lklf *09%Mrs caw% 6, a)tycv��r►t t.>►e+� 'K � tt+�s��araltyit ►�,,,ae:.' . t71n�.�i.vu.W Kft4 r&-4 DM IL**=s W+ww+44 Agar+ wrn► wrm► twnhr�R�aa l•is► sa it r I , ^^, .�••�I+�.�c 'w rsR+b1� ►"uhi6 4 9"4 a� 0;4 i�h'Iww us M►,11.'f 1964 Ni�iN► Iilr M.j�MMi�I St St +nA� Z tea 1HwINi tiv v1*1A+V M�1i j 1 /' M•Iri{. 'X OII�� 7iP�► W�IiMCdP." M�a�M ,'; ►i'�+'1�►�m 4•`MM%W 1�W� *ice • .: `t lM�.' r kr�*1,. low+.L two \wig+wAl�lr �.i Vet!• i 2•i i' . iC'�O" .`» L,�` s4va , L�•�M Ly'�� k• is •w r,r . A • ,,ice+p.1 y.• - , 1 � - . � ..•r- � '. \�' I 1�bPC�o.► 1 DO.1' •�ZOOH v J , 0• G low .• i 1,4•Via. r 1 it �♦ ► 1; to A400%i.r •r • 'J + :,<,^..t �s'� r ..,Matte w•.w �,r•u.•• •...•w• r.r.�.r• ..■wo w� rwsYw .+.. ouw.� .�wa�+�' Q ,�; 411 . w.:�1ti0'Y't, rrrrw x r All bwjmt MR. KWV *.*I,aww.. %*cr%04 Y+or �aesrl�a.� -,as s�, s! �aot t• +++�a .�nw �� w.•�-G�iwwa r+ t a�i7di Mai►t7► '+ 1 !� NiMdrltaL sK.MZt�f 1Wftff �4N0 —-f-v �MWl: Ld".L Wa$m"W..1+ k" 11 i WWMA %ft S►V Hew Oro.µ 1110t"On i` wabb ak •so • �71'tiP.L�oA`.i'4Is, t►lyfti► Q'..MCT1x+L�t.INJP �4wvd�Wi `� 4 c r r. S/Ns� �• R1TCN�►d , bN,►�ilr 1+1iA �� i �•� �J1ilY R + �T + + • !lOslAirt ♦'�Oy't 1wOM , + • • q �lDi�Q"•1g1i0t�1'iL 1'*CA�f� N."ArWtl4ii� fear ausKw� Ic�It,+t, I.1►.RY 4 ii�+� �]a11wfTL�( l+�R.o+.?t�i�s V>aR t�� �i t�sorsrt� "AfWTV NAWAKs %o►%lbuar..WL04LAMMOC iyumwuo %4u+t upo-cbk4u til�iw.i wmt ►�>rw+lwat+ 14A111ib1'D+�1M K.U►+liihl tt�,4N 00 vaer "Ro"W4. Um W~^44 is idi. ta&Mwrc*4 s tat m.%Uxx ►=C.%ww% M"ftlk Ir ww- t%w% I"%Wwx"gas, t'hhGT: ��M+.►>� �+rR4J+1hIM6+ LhX�i�ly �Ot'/►4 , !.,t;Iil1MIK0.1 �•11r1 tC► !� R kYw ++ +�Ril AtAinMKir1 %"%Cft '' ?�i�itV6��. l*NfUt 11r1t M1�� 1►i]�;�r1�+1J�.�L,11.14� ' •• '` t�OR`A3KL. tr•1+tK `i1. SI�#j. ILrM�►s+�a�►1+riMIR'•�rrlpl. �t+'S�lar,1('a (RJR IftwJ�! �1�•110r�/ WCM,b�N CO�w�SR1fS�I�rl��twt.t� Wi/M' IrraA 1MMA R'"S&C ► . sti.n..� .wwt�.�r.u+rvrw.�www.wWwx+sw�wra..� ....oiiati',Y''.•wn,a'4]diftdaowf .. �r: fir.., .,......,.. _ +�1� I i WLST LUV#*X.ow i O u UA JA 9aitn► d�aUwT0�.1« ut4J XiL7w� SOuGT . I I ++1 r� �xino 'tliy' s Md"nt.tEZ wi Y/�CE ZiatJ S M RWC'tO 4400 wwi+.w t•��•oc,rctt � � rr►as+.oe ' ��''�• '�1SJai i 5AXW Tina►0*9 tti•r' GiitStl�G �RbOlIh:G t'► S;1,• Nam a"n'uia ux set ma%. twtlt � / sruatw c�ra' S.c owa Wit' W,%L�CACIL cart ��sb '�IR�cle; dr, Liac�A �cwcS74s os w+r<neS�S ftL wf*wx- a %L ec,*L ow%Wixv, Two vftwNi off.%Co.* Q oat c rapAis& vaft*3 Au. ftwV4 io w.eo,[�w►s�. z'�'• �•t• UNAD cps ro*a'c• �) OA "M toe" u W 040L.l cm .Arm VMWA% %W-lbx"' 4%ak 44%&a IV-W, A 4ftw" ?Acmesl�y*cn+rR. U S►3ZkjZ4L oars t+t %C ~t&%.t tCA&L ; tv IL 1.••t' waU.&% Cam. TOAtdft nod A".V-Ab W*-0 fM.IW" uw% %avi..wju.rY %)TAO peemr%mow wJ ANO mm tpftpy[ 1%4.1 trq' �wA�tW h�bhw'z+ tloi.Y wwv:Tl t00%%*.*US " 2•�.` . vs., tiirSt.Ais ccaM w.u�+wwr► �QM wwtti�rw "Xn&.bbZQk 11�d,CA R'.WR 'q 1 Ott t�t.4trC�t w•lelil�pu3 wn lw Off.1wncN l tw A'laA" ► e<# 4 WA �•1�dla S�Q a b�^ �O+ib R'.O'.r'.1.' l4�Jp� ��La1M) 'lira. t+rR't�CX �R1"xr taSW�+rip0 r��t.'Otxi1� A.?. obi-%61-to V�pttls, t'CY 6'4'. 1y Wi i)1►1M►�OwR wola M N II' %Ika.ipW Tit W To G U(w'AD s•.�•o+..+► cxrt`fy.1G Rast�►'�W tacwa.�t�ae�.�� Q'irAMa3 %log SmArA, Xucr is tW,Je 1W;3r y6 1616* TWA lob lag C�7�W Wapp aC . I v.ti rarti I i•i1i' �uni�c � : �� Mue�x�otis �� � r _• trvlwc moo! t4ons,ay,. s . 1�aW ZtOATL tie, � t 1L'C c a v'►+RrO�JR! CJttlTlwb wOOc } � 1 7 L•4 y, M X � lbtW�tA4r1) w4'Ca x. km , laa+a 4vkR.ot�l i �I1TlNi Z (��1.• ' i �►y• 1ers7i \ 77w CLKT%&q& AaL W�Md►•„►'O 1i K.IIMiw1�;M f1�1•(w1 ,Y•. 1,7ib•G1�it, • Wad"LgAO AIQ 1C*a NJ S"Pa " 1iiMO t l ,iDwx1 We7% 16L#A vim !r/PNpm �,,,ct,a„v„co,a. C�'i�Cr1� 'S��'iGt�1S►, O�J1s,, . a� �b s sad-30LMT dt y6�,c,t�r�uurtw•.: ur7 ���si,cc•c�aac, u.r� M rnkt�encx ' iP +�b2JF•�1•�•Ip , I 1 ratr L( t IL Sol. Lmx .r.. ..o \• 4 41.& i 1{ f.M ♦ O Ll r! kv 3.S 2l^..4 f, It. 7 1., 11 ,5� ,S a•R ii '4 g•3 ; c.r� t I (is x 11, SA is �y 1 j'y i b r� �. ;uu ��5. rltu�5 ik'3'r L�t�L7C +3k ' tsY't:.e• .a�'.r �, _. _ --«• •r�j`��`is VI 16 • • •� • t •. • ' CTURALCALCULATIONS x. • •STRU FOR— .. • • , ,� • _.__..•tea o 3. '.� L I 'A.. , j STRUCTURAL • ENGINEER16 . GLENN ALMQUIST I: • 408 ACACIA•AVM. QRof ss o�� A r • CORONA DEL MAR, CALIF. CV� met r 1 � t • 0.16 'wrru4r• .� , *�E of { f, .. �jr/Tf�-M�' �`'.r"v.i„f?r��i . ') _ s.V���r•� � r��-��'�'J,_ .r.r,./ _�+crnwq t+III*y _ �r� I�•4���.�n.YA�� 1'�1.��� 1�.�..�'irA� - .�-��•��A�iA�IMl�l�lii+r`�1� �f' '1 /'`i 1 1 1 m{ 3c ..r"�7dY►�tJU t /20� t�/v, •��l• it i � .t 1 y lilt I iSS'� t • v6c I-Ap, I - L V-J .OLt L AL GL vp - woo salt � + . {.S; ► �1 ; ,f1�.j� F a, fib~ '�f3S3 I , -- � _._.,.�•.., .., -:. .�.-- �...-r r.-:....-�..r; r .-.. .,-.•.r••..••s_.•.�.... '_�. .:..;�'f1 ......� ....�..••...�w.........••.•... - ..r.MMIR1f•.i#7� r t CITY OF HUNTINCTMID&ACN .� �' �• •' s I , O ARTMEi IF DEVELCwiK' S VICES � ,. �. . . •� ••� .,•� •„•��.��� •.�i•f N�;jam••.,,`'•�. :S..;: y 1•,�1.•. ,y y ` `i•.� `� T' �, ti Inspec on " d • S} P 0 s"t' 0' jo � `r.. V'ritit, ` IN A CONSPtC OU P ' •'--�. �� •.23 k Cl,1 ,�'•` ::^r'7 It o-:�r�;.;:«.•.,-~•.:.,-f t.M •=-�-•r••�� !'�; U. S LAC • ,� , �',: - CALL 535.5242 FOR INSPECTIONS t•'r: •�.t��. � .► .I f•' -ram},�,y=•L' ••,�:•�.... JOB ADDRESS r•1 ��` 1� rt- PERMIT NO. 0S ... OWNER •• `•• - CONTRACTOR G'! �r6.4F�o�� INSIEC?ION DATE INStLCTOA I r,•,. ::•'��'� ''-.. PLUMBING GROUND SOIL, ELECTRICAL GROUND WORX } `:...« :•-.� •••. ::.: UNDERGROUND ELECT.SERV. 1 _•i' - �.. ,•;�::�'sir: .:. � 1' .. ....•.:. , •..', _••' .• ..:;- '.: '' � - •�' STEEL,RE RODS _,; '3' s �� ±1• /`w. �.>,. .,•+. .•_r.•;-.1•l:.f�•:•,�•;K::.'�•.�.: :\,�-'y'!• .•' FOUNDATION . � ._._......_...,...�...... •_' , •, �,• G ROUND WATER { . .�. '.• :;.;• �;, •r,► v:., •'.:.•;:. ;..•. •.r. ,.�.-• ::.•��., SLAB OR DECK •.(: . .,•,•.'S•�'•%:�,!�.j;t�'�.��• ,:..j��'. .� �' • ♦:.'r•tt:•ire. -,. ;; -.. ..- :� •�ti.' t. ... ROUGH PLUMBING 1 M .t•r. i�.,,• ..Iw,,•.1' "•L , .•ram L•.`..TF .;•'g- ' ROUGE: HEATING :_.'i .r.._• '_ 1 ' _ ;; HOUGH ELECTRICAL } r• ;�- «;. • ,•. .,;' : • ..••' .� • w, .: PRE-FAD FIREPLACE • •• �•.r1�•�.•�• .f�:..'�•�'.S. `��.••�, =.'w�v err:«`I•M/;,.«•17.t:i..'�'S. r ur � ..� - --ti-�r3��- ..;•� •►-,•` ,::r¢ •y ._,� ROUGH SHEATH ` VENTILATION SYSTEM fa FRAMING 1 . • - '' , - ,.COVEA NO WORK UNTIL. ABOVE HAS BEEN SIGNED EXTERIOR LATH } INTERIOR OR DRY WALL } W PLASTE.P BROWN COAT I ! - MISCELLANEOUS 01 � SEWER SEPTIC TANK SOLAR 114STALLATION 1 GAS TEST I 1 .G�+�•t►i �'?;rile",�r'�v?�1•',:i; a ..isa'i►;:• :; '•t�:�:;^ '.r,' ' ALL BELOW FAUST BE SIGNED BEFORE • ,, .. ►,_� . - ANY UTILITIES WILL RE RELEASED ' GRADING FINAL • LANDSCAPING FINAL • , PLUMBING FINAL HEATING F iNA L • ELECTRICAL FINAL � • FIRE DEPT. 1536.6411) WATER DEPT. I536•54311 PUBLIC WORKS 1636.54311 �� . • , SUILOINQ FILIAL •.'?`y 1.1�rr1:uK't��1�:•,�!�i .�r �r:"'�,"r'iw'�'�'��'�''..�L,�;� .w.w�sw�rnw�.1+«r■ I I 1 PARTIALLY COMPLETED WORT; AS OF STOP NOTICE I May 50 198E I i i Suhungton beach departure of community "developrn+ent 51A,f f RE 'PORT. ' To • Plarn'i - • �� � ngi`Coauni` sio'n FROM. C nuru 0 oft De v e to . • Y p me nt DATE I.: August '16 , 1988 USE P�.RMIT N0 . - 88-31 SUBJECT, CONDITIONAL Mark F 0 D P A� AN1': onnell r D TE•ACC D. - . P -O. Box 329 August 1, 1988 hunt . Beach, CA 92648 PROCESSINQ DATE: Q_„NE$: Mary Kerr October 1, ' 1988 2407 Service Road - Ceres , CA 95307 E: Oldtown Specific Plan District 1 To permit 'ezterior , alteration ; to an 4xistinq �. I3ERAL Medium that is non`Iy dwelling Density Residential _ single f�amI conforming _ _ ,. _. I with to; setbacks , EXISTYNC VSE: ` Single family Parking , and building home separation. ' = j AC 2889 sq. ft . (net) LOCATION: 503 , Joliet (northeast corner of Joliet and Delaware) I 1 1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTIQN: Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 88-31 with findings . o GEN.EBAL_.I-NFORM6TION The subject site is a. 54 foot by 55 fact parcel located .at the northeast corner of Delaware Street - and Joliet Avenue. The existing structure is an appioximately 1 , 100 square foot single- family dwelling constructed in 1920, that does not conform with.-the standards of the Oldtown Specific Plan with regard to enclosed parking, building separation, and front yard , side yard and rear yard setbacks . The applicant is :proposing to substantially alter the interior and exterior of the dwelling, including re�friming , re-roofing, electrical and plumbing improvements, changing interior walls, replacement of windows , removal of a porch and shed, and' stuccoing of the exterior . Section 9652 of the Huntington Beach ASLk A•fU43C 0�„ SPECFZC_, LAh located Nithin the ,OIdtown . Spacitic Plan-�Diak=ict 1 . • This Lollgwiny,As , a :Toning conformance chart ''camparinq the applicant ' s proposal to Oldtow'n Specific Plan standards : . .4I1 31tr. Q e Ma l i Ta Rio A f �c� 9130 .2 Mfn,,• Parcel Size 2,504 sq. f t . 2, 8B4 a . q. Min, .Frontage 25' f t . -. 54 ft , Yti 9130:3 ;. ;,r, Max*. Deinsity l t hi. 1 ua fi' : .. :: Max. FAR 9130 .4 Max. Building Height 30 , f t . except . 11: ft . (single - - ' 22 -ft . within story) 25 1t . 'of front ind ear property .- . 9130 . 5 : Max. Site Coverage 50% 45 Mr442 sq . ft . ) (1 , 298 sq . ft . ) 9130 . G Front Setback (Delaware). . Dwelling 15 ft . 3 ft . * ` - - Garage 22' ft . 28 ft. 9130 . 7 Side Setback 3 Interior 5 ft . .115 (house) :Y - - 0 ft. *- (garage) a Exterior (Joliet) f ft. 1 ft . * (hou'se) 9130 . 8 Rear Setback 7.5 f t . 11 f t . '. (house) 0 ft . f (garage) 9130 . 9 . Open Space 600 s q. f t . 723 sq.f t . 9130 . 1-3 (c) Building Separation 10 ft . 3 ft . * 9606 ( b)'(3 ) Parking 2 spaces within l.. 'space' within garage garage, 1 opeix • tandem* 9770 (Ub") Corner Cut--Off No' structure house �.encroachez* 25 ft . trinagle over 42 in . high approximately *Existing non-cohformi.ng Staff Report 8�16:�88 �-3 1oB7�dy