HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 89-25/CDP 90-91 DR JAMES SCHELL Appeal by Robert Chic CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Ice 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
April 6, 1990
Dr. James Schell
16872 Baruna Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
Dear Dr. Schell:
The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held
April 2, 1990, denied with findings, your application relative to Conditional Use
Permit No. 89-25, Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1.
This is a final decision. You are hereby notified that pursuant to provisions of
Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedures of the State of California you
have ninety days from April 6, 1990, to apply to the courts for judicial review
relative to the Conditional Use Permit.
Sincerely yours,
Connie Brockway
City Clerk
CB:me
CC: City Attorney
Community Development Director
City Administrator
Robert Chick
i
1051 K (Telephone:714-536-5227)
•,, CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
NOTICE OF ACTION
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25
APPEALABLE DEVELOPMENT
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
16872 Baruna Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92649
REQUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an
existing two story single family residence.
The addition includes a 2 , 000 square foot
third - story.
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island -
Huntington Harbour)
Your application was acted upon by the Huntington Beach
City Council on April 2, 1990 and your request was :
Approved
Conditionally approved (see attached)
X Denied
Withdrawn
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance
Code, the action taken by the City Council is final .
The City Council action on this Coastal Development is
appealable to the Coastal Commission pursuant to Public
Resources Code S. 30603 and California Administrative Code
S. 13319 , Title 14 .
i
. E
i
i
10 5 7K (Telephone: 714-536-5227)
Notice of Action
Coastal Development Permit
Page Two
Pursuant to PRC 5. 30603 , an appeal by an aggrieved person
must be filed in writing, and addressed to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The appeal period begins when the Commission receives this
notice of action and continues for ten (10) working days .
Applicants will be notified by the Coastal Commission as
to the date of the conclusion of the Commission' s review
period, and as to whether or not an appeal has been
filed. Applicants are advised not to begin construction
prior to that date.
Provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code are such
that an application becomes null and void one (1) year
after the final approval, unless actual construction has
begun.
c
Jai u�
Connie Brockway, CMC
City Clerk
.0
1057K
t
Apri12, 1990
Position Paper
Huntington Beach City Council
Property Owners Against Three Story Homes In Huntington Harbour
Reference: Conditional Use Permit#89-25/Coastal Development Permit#90-1, and
Conditional Use Permit#89-57/Coastal Development Permit#89-32.
Speakers This Evening:
(1)General Situation - Property Owners Against Three Story Homes, - Robert L. Chick
(2)Why the Harbour Community Is Against These 2 Three Story Homes, - Manuel E. Peres'
(3) CC&R's Are In Effect On All Harbour Property,.- Joseph Rosen x
(4) Huntington Harbour Architectural Setting, -Mary Ellen Hoseal ^,
(5)Environmental Concerns, -William E. Kavasch
(6) Survey Results of 2700 Harbour Residents, - Stewart Zuck rn
(7) Summary "'
rn
N 'pmrn
Speakers:
(1). General Situation 2 Pending Requests for Third Story Home Permits At _
Huntington Harbour. o T
• Good evening my name is Dr. Robert L. Chick, I am a scientist and businessman, and-I am
here to speak as a Huntington Harbour property owner against three story homes.
•At issue-2 specific three story homes 16872 Baruna Lane and 16391 Ardsley Circle
and a request for a zoning change to two story homes only for the Harbour Community.
•We met with the City Planning Department and
worked out a plan for Harbour home modifications exclusive of third story construction.
•We conducted a survey of all 2700 Harbour property owners as to their.views regarding
two and three story homes.
• Will of the Huntington Harbour Property Owners is against three story homes.
(2) Why The Harbour Community Is Against .These 2 Three Story Homes.
• Good evening my name is Manuel E.Perez,I am a practicing Architect, the former Chairman
of the Long Beach Planning Commission, the former Chairman of the Huntington Beach
Redevelopment Commission and Design Review Board, and I am here to speak as an
architectural consultant for the Huntington Harbour property owners.
• I have reviewed the City planning code, the CC&R's, and the two proposed designs.
• Items the property owners find unacceptable with the 16391 Ardsley Circle remodeling.
• Items the property owners find unacceptable with the 16872 Baruna Lane remodeling.
• We request that the Council disapprove these 2 three-story homes and zone Huntington
Harbour for two story homes only.
(3). CC&R's Are In Effect On All Harbour Property.
•Good evening my name is Joe Rosen,I am the Director of the Architectural Committee
for the Huntington Harbour Property Owners Association, and I am here to speak as a
Huntington Harbour property owner against three story homes.
• CC&R's established in 1964, approved by the state and City of Huntington Beach.
• CC&R's are implemented by Huntington Harbour Property Owners Association.
•Highlights of CC&R's - homes limited to one and two stories in height.
•Per the agreement worked out with the Planning Department we believe all CC&R issues
can be accommodated except the three story issue.
(4). Huntington Harbour Architectural Setting.
•Good evening my name is Mary Ellen Hoseal,I am an attorney, and I am here to speak as a
Huntington Harbour property owner against three story homes.
• The current architectural setting, consistent with the CC&R's,.is one and two story homes.
•Less than 1% have third story protrusions,
and none of these have 2000 square feet on the third floor. /
1
M
i. Apol 2, 1990
Position Paper
Huntington Beach City Council
Property Owners Against Three Story Homes In Huntington. Harbour
Continued:
•We encourage our neighbors to improve their property consistent with the established
CC&R's, original setbacks, architectural ascetics, and preservation of neighbors views.
•Harbour residents are not alone in disliking inappropriate housing modifications.
• Two surveys support our position against the Baruna Lane and Ardsley Circle homes.
• We request that the City Council disapprove.these 2 three story homes and zone Huntington
Harbour for two story homes only.
(4). Environmental Concerns.
• Good evening my name is Bill Kavasch,I am retired mechanical engineer, and I am here to
speak as a Huntington Harbour property owner against three story homes.
• General trend and environmental concern on the encroachment of bulkhead setbacks.
• Possible earthquake impact of a three story home on Davenport Island access.
• We request that the Council disapprove these 2 three story homes and zone Huntington.
Harbour for two story homes only.
(6) Survey Results of 2850 Harbour Residents.
• Good evening my name is Stewart Zuck, I am a businessman, I am the Treasurer of the
Huntington Harbour Property Owners Association, and I am here to speak as a Huntington
Harbour property owner against-three story homes.
• Over 2850 Huntington property owners were surveyed by mail starting March 16, 1990.
• The survey addressed preferences for two, three, or three story homes with special
considerations.
• The results of that survey involved xx responses, with xy in favor of two story homes,
xz in favor of three story homes, and xx in favor of three story homes with special provisions.
• The will of the people has spoken.
• We request that the Council disapprove these 2 three story homes and zone Huntington
Harbour for two story homes only.
(7) Summary.
• In the last 18 minutes you have heard the voice of the Huntington Harbor property owners
speak clearly, speak specifically, and speak aggressively against three story homes.
• Huntington Harbour residents are not alone in desiring to maintain a quality to life.
•We have presented the rational as to why both of these houses, 16872 Baruna Lane and
16391 Ardsley Circle should be disapproved from third story construction.
•We have worked out a plan with the City Planning Department so that we can meet our
CC&R objectives in a harmonious implementation.
• We have presented the environmental, technical, and architectural impacts concerning three
story homes.
• We have presented the results of a 2850 home survey.of Huntington Harbor property
owners views as to three story homes.
•We request that the City Council respect the wishes of the property owners and disapprove
these 2 three story homes and zone Huntington Harbour for two story homes only.
On behalf of all of our speakers, we thank the City Council for the opportunity to speak,
your valuable time, and your vote to support the will of the Huntington Harbor people.
Huntington Harbour Property Owners
Appellant Robert L. Chick, et al
2
Authorized to Publish Advertise. ants of all kinds including
public notices by Decree of the Sup�rior Court-of Qrange
CO
Calilomia, Nurnber A-621 September 29, 1961. and — ---
A•24831 June 11.1963. t D r V
f
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Orange
am a Citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the =
age of eighteen ears, and not a a to or I - =Sans appeal must be in
9 9 Y party 1 PUBLIC NOTICE ^ writing and must set forth in
interested in the below entitled matter. I am a I NOTICE OF detail the actions; and
i' PUBLIC HEARING grounds by and upon which.
clerk of the ORANGE COAST DAILY APPEAL OF the applicant h interested
principal PLANNING Party deems himself ag
PILOT. a newspaper of general circulation, COMMISSION'S grieved.
appeal of a coastal deere Is no fee r;
APPROVAL OF velopment permit. An ag-1
printed and published in the City of Costa Mesa, CONDITIONAL USE grieved person may file and
PERMIT NO. appeal to the Coastal Com-
County of Orange, State of California, and that CO89-25/ASTAL mission within ten(10)work-
Ing days from when the
co
attached Notice is a true and complete as DEVELOPMENT Coastal Commission re-
PERMIT NO.90-1 I ceived the Notice of Action
4 (To construct from the City of Huntington
was'printed and published in the Cosa Mesa, l a fhlyd story i Beach, pursuant to Section
Newport Beach Huntington Beach Fountain ad gle f is y 3ourc of.the Public to:
sin le family
residence) :I sources Code,In writing to:
Valley, Irvine, the South Coast communities and I NOTICE IS HEREBY I I California Coastal Com-
GIVEN that the Huntington)I mission, 245 W. Broadway,
Laguna Beach issues of said newspaper to wit Beagt,City Council will hold ,Suite 380, POB 1450, Long
9 l�l� I Beach, California
the issue(s) of; s p Iic hearing in the Coun-I'90801-1450(213)590-5071
cil Chamber at the Hunt-1
� The Coastal Commission
ington Beach Civic Center, review period will com-
'2000 Main Street, Hunt= mence after the City appeal)
ington Beach,California,on period has ended and no ap-
Ithe date and at the time in peals have been filed.AppII
Idicated below to receive and cants will be notified by the;
r�3rt h"2�, 1990 consider the statements of
all persops who wish to be Coastal Commission o to
heard relative to the appli- the date of the conclusion of'.
jcation described below. the Coastal Commission re-,
DATE/TIME: Monday, view..Applicants are advised;
April 7:00 - riot to begin construction,
APPLICATION NUMBER: Prior to that date. �
Appeal to the Planning Com- ON FILE: A copy of.the
missions Approval,of Con- proposed development plan
m
I is on file In the Community'
Idtionaf -Use Permit .No. Development Department,
89-25/Coastal.Development 2000, Main Street, Hunt—
Permit No.90-1 ington Beach, California-
APPLICANT: Dr. James 92648,for inspection by the.
Schell
APPELLANT: .Robert Public, A copy. v theilable aff
to
Chick,et al report will`be available to
LOCATION: 16872 interested parties at.,City'
Beruna Lane (Davenport Hall.
Island-Huntington Harbour) ALL INTERESTED PER-
ZONE:R1-CZ'(Low Densi- SONS are invited to attend
ty' Residential-Coastal said hearing and express
Zone) opinions or submit evidence
REQUEST: 7o permit the for or against the application
as
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the remodel and addition to an are antlined above: If there
existing two story single fam- - any questions or further
sly residence.,The addition details necessary please
foregoing is true and correct. includes a 2,000 square foot !contact Herb Fau
- third story. s(stant Planner at 536-6-5271.
1.
ENVIRONMENTAL Connie Brockway, Hunt-
EC., MEXCh 22, 0 STATUS: Categorically ex-!'I Ington Beach City Clerk
xecuted on 1199 mept pursuant to Section Published' Orange Coast.
15301, Class 1, of the Call Daily Pilot March 22,1990
at Costa Me California Th27o;
Sa, fornia Environmental Quality
Act.
kk COASTAL STATUS: APri
PEALABLE(See Below)
This project is in the ap
pealable portion of. the,
Signature coastal zone. .
Under the provisions of
the Huntington Beach Ordi-
nance Code, the action
taken by the City Council is:
final unless an appeal Is filed,
to the Coastal Commission
by the applicant or an ag=
grieved party.
'�� PROOF OF PUBLICATION
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Date April 2, 1990
Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Submitted by: Michael Uberuaga, City Administrator �n�C�
Prepared by: Michael Adams, Director of Commun7ty Developme
Subject: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25 AND COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
Consistent with Council Policy? [ ] Yes [ ] New Policy or Exception
Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE•
Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by Robert Chick,
et al, to the Planning Commission' s approval of Conditional Use
Permit No. 89-25 and Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1.
Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 and Coastal Development Permit No.
90-1 is a request to permit the remodel and addition to an existing
two (2) story single family residence. The addition includes a
2, 000 square foot third story.
RECOMMENDATION•
Planning-C mmission Action on February 21, 1990:
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MOUNTFORD, SECOND BY KIRKLAND, TO APPROVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.
90-1, WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
AYES: Leipzig, Mountford, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland,
Bourguignon, Shomaker
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
PIO 5/85
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 89-25:
1. The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2,000 square foot third floor will not
have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare,
safety and privacy of persons working or residing in the
vicinity or will not be detrimental to the value of the
property and improvements in the vicinity. As proposed the
third story addition without windows or roof deck will not
affect the adjacent neighborhood. In addition, the proposed
remodel will increase the property values of the existing home
and the surrounding neighborhood.
2 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2,000 square foot third floor is
compatible with existing or proposed uses in the vicinity and
has anticipated the age and permanence of the existing
subdivision which was built in 1963 .
3 . The location, site layout and design of the proposed
remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor is properly
related to the streets, drive and other structures and uses in
the vicinity in a harmonious manner. The proposed building is
provided with additional front building offsets, adequate side
and rear yard setbacks and will be provided with a three-car
garage._ Also, the proposed remodel will not affect the channel
to the east, . the park to the west, or the homes across
Davenport Lane.
4 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor is
consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach
General Plan.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1:
1. The remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal Development
Permit No. 90-1 conforms with the plans, policies, requirements
and standards. of the Coastal Element.
2 . The remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal Development
Permit No. 90-1 is consistent with the CZ suffix, low density
residential development standards, as well as other provisions
of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the
property.
3 . Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1, at the time of occupancy,
the proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a third floor will provide infrastructure
in a manner that is consistent with the C-LUP.
RCA 4/2/90 -2- (5197d)
4 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1 conforms with the public access and
public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California
Coastal Act.
Staff Recommendation:
Planning Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the action
taken by the Planning Commission on February 21, 1990 by denying the
appeal.
ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 in conjunction with Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1 is a request to permit the remodel and
addition to an existing 2, 140 square foot, two-story single family
residence with a two car garage on Davenport Island in Huntington
Harbour. The addition includes a 2, 000 square foot third story
addition. Section 9110.4(a) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code
states that the Planning Commission may approve building heights of
thirty (30) feet and/or three (3) stories pursuant to the
conditional use permit process . .
The proposed remodel and addition to the existing 2, 140 square foot,
two-story single family residence includes the addition of
approximately 2, 500 square feet of floor area. The first floor
remodel/addition includes a new entry area, remodeled kitchen and
expanded existing two (2) car garage into a three (3) car garage.
The second floor remodel/addition includes a family room, library,
exercise room and guest bedroom. The third floor addition includes
approximately 2, 000 square feet for a master bedroom, master bath
and two additional bedrooms. The third floor addition requires the
discretionary review through the conditional use permit process .
The City Council shall consider the following guidelines when
considering the request for a third story addition:
(1) The proposed building shall not have a detrimental effect on
the general health, safety, welfare or privacy of surrounding
residents, or on surrounding property values.
(2) The location, site plan and building design shall be harmonious
and compatible with the streets, driveways, property lines, and
surrounding neighborhood.
(3) The age and anticipated permanence of buildings on adjacent
properties shall be considered.
(4) The Council shall consider any other criteria it deems
necessary to preserve the health, safety, welfare and
convenience of the neighborhood.
RCA 4/2/90 -3- (5197d)
In reviewing the applicant ' s request to permit a third story
addition, staff feels that the design of the third story addition
will not be detrimental or effect the surrounding residents or
surrounding property values . The applicant is proposing to
construct the front elevation (Baruna Lane) with second and third
story building setbacks of an additional 5 and 3 feet,
respectively. This will reduce the visual bulk of the third story
addition.
In addition, the right side elevation (Davenport Drive) will be
setback approximately 45 feet from the public right-of-way. The
existing site plan is conducive to reducing building bulk along the
streetsides of the subject property. The proposed building design,
location and site plan will be compatible with the surrounding
properties . Also, the overall height of the third story
remodel/addition will be approximately 28 feet to the average height
of the highest pitched roof giving the general appearance of the
surrounding two-story structures.
The analysis of the proposed 2,000 square foot third story addition
also included the potential infringement of privacy upon the
surrounding properties. As proposed, the third story addition would
only have the potential to affect the adjacent (north) property
owner. The other adjacent properties consist of a public park,
waterway and Davenport Lane. The adjacent (north) property is
developed with a two-story single family residence. The proposed
remodel and addition proposes no windows along the north elevation
and the applicant does not propose any roof decks. Without windows
and roof deck, no infringement of privacy exists upon the adjacent
property owner.
In their letter of appeal, Robert Chick, et al, contend twelve items
of agrievement . The items can be generalized into three (3)
categories; 1) Architectural compatibility, 2) Huntington Harbour
Association Rights, and 3) Structural Requirements . Each of the
above arguments are discussed below.
1. Architectural Compatibility
As noted in the attached February 21, 1990 Planning Commission Staff
Report, the applicant has provided front setback building offsets to
reduce visual bulk of the third story addition and is proposing a
maximum building height of 30 feet to the peak of the new roof. In
addition, the average height of the highest pitched roof will be
approximately 28 feet, giving the general appearance of the
surrounding two-story single family residential structures. The
proposed project does not propose any windows along the north
elevation or any roof decks, therefore, no infringement of privacy
exists upon the adjacent (north) property owner.
RCA 4/2/90 -4- (5197d)
The appellant also notes that the Planning Commission is permitting
architectural change in Huntington Harbour without due process and
is setting a precedent. As required pursuant to Section 9110.4(a)
of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, building heights of thirty
(30) feet and/or three (3) stories require the discretionary review
of the conditional use permit (CUP) process by the Planning
Commission. The CUP process and coastal development permit require
public hearing, which in turn require public notification of all
property owners within a 300 foot radius and all residents/occupants
within a 100 foot radius respectively. The applicant has complied
with ordinance code and state law to provide due process to
Huntington Harbour residents . Finally, the appellant notes that
this request will set a precedent in the Huntington Harbour. It
should be noted that there are numerous three (3) story single
family residence in the Harbour area and the Harbour area is in a
transition period of major remodeling. The approval of this CUP
will not set a precedent.
2. Huntington Harbour Association Rights
The appellant notes, that the Harbour property owners should be able
to voice their opinions, allow 2/3 vote to approve a third story
addition and that all property owners should be treated equal.
Staff maintains that the owners were given the opportunity to voice
their opinions at the public hearing and by petition, and that the
ordinance code does not require a 2/3 Harbour property owner vote to
approve a third story addition. Please note, as required by Section
9110.4(a) each owner who would like to remodel their home in such a
manner would be treated equally and be required to follow the same
discretionary review process as the applicant.
3 . Structural Requirements
The appellants note that the existing seawall will not have the load
bearing to adequately bear the weight of the third story addition.
As required by the Uniform Building code and Building Division,
structural calculations will be required to address these issues .
They also note that the proposal requires a variance to the 22 front
setback for a front entry garage. The existing home is setback at
20 feet as was required when Tract 5264 was developed. The
applicant is not changing the footprint of the existing building.
All proposed additions are at or within the existing footprint of
the residence. Finally, they note that the proposal may be
converted into a multiple-family dwelling. In staff ' s review of the
proposed addition, every planning issue is taken into account to
address such potential concerns. Staff does not believe the
residence will be converted into a multiple family residence nor is
it the intent of the applicant.
Summary
In response to the letter of appeal, staff believes that the subject
conditional use permit and coastal development permit were processed
in full compliance with City and State requirements and that due
process was given to all parties involved. The staff and Planning
Commission believe that all findings required for the approval of
this project can be supported.
RCA 4/2/90 -5- (5197d)
FUNDING SOURCE:
Not applicable.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The City Council may approve the appeal by overturning the Planning
Commission' s action on February 21, 1990 and denying Conditional Use
Permit No. 89-25 and Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1 with
findings.
ATTACHMENT•
1. Area map
2 . Letter of Appeal dated March 5, 1990
3 . Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 21, 1990 .
4 . Draft Minutes of the February 21, 1990 Planning Commission
meeting.
5. Map of three story homes in Huntington Harbour (Wall map)
MTU:MA•H . lab
RCA 4/2/90 -6- (5197d)
<ar/ �2.
a,y7 /.C�✓j,/ ✓l1/�j c r�/ /�^1} n y'"C� /� Q/ �q /RSTUWA emR!°ioaoo w sI II - R3 2 '�LAI
,� CF E
0 C\ �� 2 p r�o cy /,C G1 / a•::c ..E.. .,...,,.- R2 U oglA
-P �/ ` y1Q RI CZ CF-R .o
RNING STAR ll!�- `r R
I-CZ J �\ Oft.
PICKWICK CR
to 1. Z r 1 (J VV/ 4P J�WR-Q-FP2 .x
\.CI BRANIF A iiVl'AMNJI:'bA::
RI-CZ i \'GI.
Da. z
2 R 3 R2 R2 N R2
/ RI- Z -G
?�R�\G,�. ��',(,_ _ �., <V/Yi/ � ���j/ y�• Q� G,� CZ-FP2FEARCE
ZE RI cz s r
N P 3 DALE DR.KAV :Nrwc:ti
,�,� i i o i yL R\,G1 WALK DR R2 I R2 I R2
} Z r1 N SI p- .FP2 C
s y� n RI CZ RI�Z Y T—CL 9➢r i MII�SF
CT U z RI CZ K C,Y I
CZ W f <
/�I•'� �;` �V� f f U DavFfaV DAV NPORT t _
$R -CZ J - R3
F
°o
I w n
wwasoR aL WO z a ¢ J RI-CZ„RI-CZ
R2-C2 RI_`Z
ca�t+i '3W WESTPIXiT �RI-C2 �
�i �' K'"° 'I R I CZ R w x!E
�� G2 0 —
R3 IRS
M16
R2R
F
WR-CZ-FP2 -P� RI-CZ
( o 16A S\ R2-CZ � wa-�-� �7.F.ATRERLY BAY N
5ve ! IV
Nor 'E191.6i I—cz RI-CZ3 _ , V U
WR-CZ-FP2
'ALADDIN DR. HUNTINGTON HARBOR n�P e
BAY CLUB SPEC
w rrcT IFIC PLANS G� RI—CZ '"RI-CZ
R I'CZ
ol-ram-='I i o CF-C-CZ a.g a I E¢ C�p7NCY �\
Ac? RI-CZ / R-
C/,c. \ ." AVE WARNER ,. a 4 AVE. RI-CZ .�
% W^A NEfl
HUNTINGTON BEACH
HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION
DRAFT
i
t
B-4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 89-25/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.
90-1
APPLICANT: DR. JAMES SCHELL
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington
Harbour)
Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 in conjunction with Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1 is a request to permit the remodel and
addition to an existing 2, 140 square foot, two-story single family
residence with a two car garage on Davenport Island in Huntington
Harbour. The addition includes a 2, 000 square foot third story
addition. Section 9110 .4(a) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code
states that the Planning Commission may approve building heights of
thirty (30) feet and/or three (3) stories pursuant to the
conditional use permit process .
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California Environmental Quality Act.
COASTAL STATUS:
The proposed remodel and addition to an existing two-story single
family residence is located within the appealable area of the
coastal zone. Therefore, Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1 has
been prepared in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 .
Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25, it is
necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 and Coastal Development
Permit No. 90-1 with findings and conditions of approval.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
James J. Schell, 16872 Baruna Lane, applicant, spoke in support of
the request. He said he has accomplished all guidelines imposed on
him by staff and urged the Commission to approve.
Joe Rosen, 16915 Edgewater Lane, Association member, spoke in
opposition to the request. He said the plans are not harmonious
with surrounding residences since the CC&Rs limit the homes to one
and two stories .
1
PC Minutes - 2/21/90 -8- (5120d)
Lewis Goldenson, 16831 Baruna Lane, representing several homeowners,
spoke in opposition to the proposed three story home. He said the
plans have not been reviewed by the Architectural Board of his
Homeowners Association and that the CC&Rs specifically say one and
two story homes . He feels the Architectural Committee should have
reviewed the plans before being presented to the City. He would
like to see more cooperation between the City and the Homeowners
Association.
There were no other persons present to speak for or against the
request and the public hearing was closed.
The Commission felt that because the proposed remodel and addition
did not propose any windows along the north elevation or any roof
decks that no infringement of privacy existed upon the adjacent
property owners . In addition the Commission noted that the proposed
addition met all code requirements for the Low Density Residential
and Coastal zones .
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MOUNTFORD, SECOND BY KIRKLAND, TO APPROVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.
90-1, WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
AYES: Leipzig, Mountford, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland,
Bourguignon, Shomaker
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 89-25:
1. The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor will not
have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare,
safety and privacy of persons working or residing in the
vicinity or will not be detrimental to the value of the
property and improvements in the vicinity. As proposed the
third story addition without windows or roof deck will not
affect the adjacent neighborhood. In addition, the proposed
remodel will increase the property values of the existing home
and the surrounding neighborhood.
2 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2,000 square foot third floor is
compatible with existing or proposed uses in the vicinity and
has anticipated the age and permanence of the existing
subdivision which was built in 1963 .
PC Minutes - 2/21/90 -9- (5120d)
3 . The location, site layout and design of the proposed
remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor is properly
related to the streets, drive and other structures and uses in
the vicinity in a harmonious manner. The proposed building is
provided with additional front building offsets, adequate side
and rear yard setbacks and will be provided with a three-car
garage. Also, the proposed remodel will not affect the channel
to the east, the park to the west, or the homes across
Davenport Lane.
4 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor is
consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach
General Plan.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1:
1. The remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal Development
Permit No. 90-1 conforms with the plans, policies, requirements
and standards of the Coastal Element.
2. The remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal Development
Permit No. 90-1 is consistent with the CZ suffix, low density
residential development standards, as well as other provisions
of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the
property.
3 . Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1, at the time of occupancy,
the proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a third floor will provide infrastructure
in a manner that is consistent with the C-LUP.
4 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1 conforms with the public access and
public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California
Coastal Act.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated
February 5, 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout.
2. Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner
shall complete the following:
a. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials
proposed.
b. The site plan shall include all conditions of approval
imposed on the project printed verbatim.
PC Minutes - 2/21/90 -10- (5120d)
3 . The Public Works Department requirements are as follows :
a. The water service to the home shall have a Water Division
approved back-flow prevention system.
4 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows :
a. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and
installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations .
b. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and
Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards .
5 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of
the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department .
6 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and
other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an
off-site facility equipped to handle them.
7. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7: 00 AM to
8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal
holidays.
8 . Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed:
a. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property
shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans
and conditions of approval specified herein.
b. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein
shall be accomplished.
9 . Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 and Coastal Development Permit
No. 90-1 shall become null and void unless exercised within one
(1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of
time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a
written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum
30 days prior to the expiration date.
B-5 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 89-443/CONDITIONAL EXCEPTION
(VARIANCE) NO. 89-65/NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO 90-3
APPLICANT: ROBERT STELLRECHT JR.
LOCATION: 7841 Glencoe (north side of Glencoe, west of Beach
Boulevard)
Tentative Parcel Map No. 89-443, Conditional Exception (Variance)
No. 89-65 and Negative Declaration No. 90-3 is a request for the
subdivision of a 110 foot by 135 foot parcel into two parcels, one
with 60 feet of frontage and one with 50 feet of frontage. The
PC Minutes - 2/21/90 -11- (5120d)
huntington beach department of community development
STAff
_REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Community Development
DATE: February 21, 1990
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE. PERMIT NO. 89-25/COASTAL DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT NO. 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell DATE ACCEPTED:
16872 Baruna Lane February 1, 1990
Hunt . Beach, CA 92649
MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE:
REOUEST: To permit the remodel and April 1, 1990
addition to an existing
two story single family ZONE: R1-CZ (Low Density
residence. The addition Residential-Coastal Zone)
includes a 2, 000 sq. ft .
third story. GENERAL PLAN: Low Density
Residential
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane
(Davenport Island - EXISTING USE: Two story
Huntington Harbour) single family residence
ACREAGE: . 14± (6, 300 sq. ft . )
1 . 0 SUGGESTED ACTION.:
Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 and Coastal Development
Permit No. 90-1 with findings and conditions of approval .
2 . 0 GENERAL INFORMATION:
Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 in conjunction with Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1 is a request to permit the remodel and
addition to an existing 2, 140 square foot, two-story single family
residence with a two car garage on Davenport Island in Huntington
Harbour. The addition includes a 2, 000 square foot third story
addition. Section 9110 .4(a) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code
states that the Planning Commission may approve building heights of
thirty (30) feet and/or three (3) stories pursuant to the
conditional use permit process .
A-FM-23C
3 �
3 . 0 SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS:
Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
ZONE: R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal
Zone)
LAND USE: Two story single family residence
North and South of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
ZONE: R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal
Zone)
LAND USE: Two story single family residence
East of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Open Space-Water
ZONE: WR-CZ-FP2 (Waterway Recreation-Coastal
Zone-Floodplain District 2)
LAND USE: Weatherly Channel
West of Subject Property:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential
ZONE: CF-R-CZ (Community Facilities-
Recreation-Coastal Zone)
LAND USE: Park
4 . 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California Environmental Quality Act .
5 . 0 COASTAL STATUS:
The proposed remodel and .addition to an existing two-story single
family residence is located within the appealable area of the
coastal zone. Therefore, Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1 has
been prepared in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 .
Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25, it is
necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1. Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1
may be approved or conditionally approved only after it has been
found to be in conformance with the Coastal Element of the General
Plan by making the following findings :
(a) LUP. That the development project proposed by the coastal
development permit application conforms with the plans,
policies, requirements and standards of the Coastal Element .
Staff Report - 2/21/90 -2- (4807d)
(b) Zoning Regulations . That the coastal development permit
application is consistent with the CZ suffix, the base zoning
district or specific plan as well as other provisions of the
Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property;
(c) Adequate Services . That at the time of occupancy the proposed
development can be provided with infrastructure in a manner
that is consistent with C-LUP;
(d) California Coastal Act . That the development conforms with the
public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of
the California Coastal Act .
6 . 0 REDEVELOPMENT STATUS: Not applicable.
7 . 0 SPECIFIC PLAN: Not applicable.
8 . 0 SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE: Not applicable.
9 . 0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
The proposed remodel and addition to the existing 2, 140 square foot,
two-story single family residence includes the addition of
approximately 2, 500 square feet of floor area . The first floor
remodel/addition includes a new entry area, remodeled kitchen and
expanded existing two (2) car garage into a three (3) car garage.
The second floor remodel/addition includes a family room, library,
exercise room and guest bedroom. The third floor addition includes
approximately 2,000 square feet for a master bedroom, master bath
and two additional bedrooms . The third floor addition requires the
discretionary review through the conditional use permit process .
The following is a zoning conformance matrix which compares the
proposed -project with the development standards of the Low Density
Residential (R1) district .
Section Issue Reggix red Proposed
9110 .2 Parcel Size 6, 000 sq.ft . 6,300 sq. ft .
Frontage 60 ft. 63 ft.
9110 . 3 Density 1 unit .max. 1 unit
9110 .4 Building Height Max. 25 ft ./ 30 ft./
2 story 3 story*
9110 . 5 Max. Site Coverage 55%/3,466 sq. ft . 34%/2, 142 sq. ft .
9110 . 6 Front yard Setback 22 ft . 20 ft . (existing)
*Conditional Use Permit required
Staff Report - 2/21/90 -3- (4807d)
Section Issue Required Proposed
9110 . 7 Side yard Setback:
Interior 5 ft . 5 ft .
. Exterior 10 ft . 10 ft .
9110 . 8 Rear yard Setback 5 ft. 14 ft. -8 in.
9110 . 9 Open Space Exempt N/A
9110 . 10 Parking 2 covered 3 covered
The Planning Commission shall consider the following guidelines when
considering the request for a third story addition:
(1) The proposed building shall not have a detrimental effect on
the general health, safety, welfare or privacy of surrounding
residents, or on surrounding property values .
(2) The location, site plan and building design shall be harmonious
and compatible with the streets, driveways, property lines, and
surrounding neighborhood.
i
(3) The age and anticipated permanence of buildings on adjacent
properties shall be considered.
(4) The Commission shall consider any other criteria it deems
necessary to preserve the health, safety, welfare and
convenience of the neighborhood.
i
In reviewing the applicant ' s request to permit a third story
addition, staff feels that the design of the third story addition
will not be detrimental or effect the surrounding residents or
surrounding property values . The applicant is proposing to
construct the front elevation (Baruna Lane) with second and third
story building setbacks of an additional 5 and 3 feet,
respectively. This will reduce the visual bulk of the third story
addition.
In addition, the right side elevation (Davenport Drive) will be
setback approximately 45 feet from the public right-of-way. The
existing site plan is conducive to reducing building bulk along the
streetsides of the subject property. The proposed building design,
location and site plan will be compatible with the surrounding
properties . Also, the overall height of the third story
remodel/addition will be approximately 28 feet to the average height
of the highest pitched roof giving the general appearance of the
surrounding two-story structures .
Staff Report - 2/21/90 -4- (4807d)
The analysis of the proposed 2, 000 square foot third story addition
also included the potential infringement of privacy upon the
surrounding properties . As proposed, the third story addition would
only have the potential to affect the adjacent (north) property
owner . The other adjacent properties consist of a public park,
waterway and Davenport Lane. The adjacent (north) property is
developed with a two-story single family residence. The proposed
remodel and addition proposes no windows along the north elevation
and the applicant does not propose any roof decks . Without windows
and roof deck, no infringement of privacy exists upon the adjacent
property owner .
10 . 0 RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional
Use Permit No. 89-25 and Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1 with
the following findings and conditions of approval :
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 89-25 :
1 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor will not
have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare,
safety and privacy of persons working or residing in the
vicinity or will not be detrimental to the value of the
property and improvements in the vicinity.
2 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor is
compatible with existing or proposed uses in the vicinity.
3 . The location, site layout and design of the proposed
remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor is properly
related to the streets, drive and other structures and uses in
the vicinity in a harmonious manner.
4 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor is
consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach
General Plan.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO, 90-1:
1 . The remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a third floor as . proposed by Coastal Development
Permit No . 90-1 conforms with the plans, policies, requirements
and standards of the Coastal Element .
2 . The remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal Development
Permit No. 90-1 is consistent with the CZ suffix, low density
residential development standards, as well as other provisions
of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the
property.
Staff Report - 2/21/90 -5- (4807d)
J f,
i
3 . Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1, at the time of occupancy,
the proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a third floor will provide infrastructure
in a manner that is consistent with the C-LUP.
4 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1 conforms with the public access and
public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California
Coastal Act .
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1 . The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated
February 5, 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout .
i
2 . Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner
shall complete the following: itt
a . Elevations shall depict colors and building materials E
proposed.
b. The site plan shall include all conditions of approval
imposed on the project printed verbatim.
3 . The Public Works Department requirements are as follows :
a . The water service to the home shall have a Water Division
approved back-flow prevention system.
4 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows :
a. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and
installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations .
b. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and
Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards .
5 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of
the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department .
6 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and
other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an
off-site facility equipped to handle them. -
7. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7: 00 AM to
8 : 00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal
holidays .
Staff Report - 2/21/90 -6- (4807d)
8 . Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed:
a . All improvements (including landscaping) to the property
shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans
and conditions of approval specified herein.
b. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein
shall be accomplished.
9 . Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 and Coastal Development Permit
No. 90-1 shall become null and void unless exercised within one
(1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of
time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a
written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum
30 days prior to the expiration date.
11 . 0 ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
The Planning Commission may deny Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25
and Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1 with findings .
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Area map
2 . Narrative
3 . Site plans, elevations, and floor plans dated February 5, 1990
HS:HF•kla
Staff Report - 2/21/90 -7- (4807d)
R3 zaT'�;"d41
��/ `�� / ^ 04f / n 59.20'i T•E]T6200.00 W R
a ,� ✓/ Fp �e CF-E .. ..A.° ���/ / r,: •..F... .,. .,. R 2 R 3 AGfA
CF-R
9 �G�
•� \r. // y� No9ulr. sTSR 'I R
R/CIRI-CZ <'rul J
EP 2 ° ._ \ V// 4`t'P ��WR'Q•FPZ PICNWILN CR
BRANFOR Gl- 74 W"OMMAl_:
i FLU' oa- .TQ
\ti R, Z R 3 R 2 „ R 2 N R 2
RI-CZ cr
•1,
N ^ FI aR R ` GZ d� � .......... PEARCE
o ti .� /�/., a\ WALK
; c R2 R R 2
RI CZ
i v � cT' sPy �a, Ny 2
`P',.:• Q-� 1j'��� �j�1 ,�j � � = Gv 6a I-CZ Q� � y ZaUMBN.t � CZ '•1 �-��
RI"
tJ '
; — U i� R -FP2 RI'(.Z RI('.Z 2R1 I lJ"r—CZ'40' I KILO ST.
'•,+ �/ f V OAYZ DAV NPORT
CZ R v y
\' '!pi I-
/ m ` C
N A- , .._J o
_ - R3 F
xvaDBaR DiL� _y RI-CZ�
+� ..._R.icz... of R13cT"�' a—= —-'--'RI-CZ
Ill Go A RI-u J
WESTPORT RI-OZ 3
I-CZ RI-C
R\y R I-CZ RI-CZ c� R3 A3
6\-
r c2F R2 F
N WR-CZ-FP2 F RI-CZ
\ A RZ-CZ Wa"G1 I Y.f.AT/Ef7.Y BAY U
q �q, Re9•sru•EI9za: i WR-CZ-FP2
I-CZ RI CZ�
� 'ALADDIN DR. YHUNTINGTONCLUBHARBOR/ �r'\. e
y -a cT•G BAY CLUB SPECIFIC PLAN/ G RI"CZ RI-CZ
P °° CF-c-cz D RI-CZ TNEv ��
�1 R,
9 R I-CZ
% \ 2e:.., n AVE WARNER „^ " SAVE. RI-CZ
WA NER
z C u P8 9-- Z5 C D P 9o---1L �-
HUNTINGTON BEACH
- r HUNTINGTON BEACH PLANNING DIVISION
- Tames J. Schell
16782 Baruna Lane
Huntington Beach, Ca.
92649
The subject property is a single family residence on the water.
in Huntington Harbor. The owner desires to provide property im-
provements and additional living space fpr his family through the
provision of:
A. Pitched roof
B. Additional bedrooms
C. Family Room
D. Breakfast room
The existing site plan is such that the only reasonable way
to accomplishthe requirements is through the addition of a
third story. Engineering consultation reflects the original
foundations will support the additions. The site location adjacent
to to a bridge and across from a beach to the east and a park to
the west minimizes the impact upon existing neighbors.
The residence is situated in a single family, non commercial,
neighborhood on Davenport Island in. Huntington Harbor. The
property will continue as a single family waterfront residence.
The property improvements are solely for the enhacement of an
existing single family mesidence for the benefit of the owner and
his family without any commercial interests.
The surrounding use relates to single family living with the
benefit of an existing swimming pool , boat dock., adjacent beach
and park.
2nd&3rd Floor Additions
&Remodel far
Dr. Jim Schell n N N C L f
Tabulations [.caGl �•5e u
Area Residence
D[<GRIofbIJ e°.R. 'DGSCVPTION "Sti.FT
L.Or ARr^ 6,12aLc 1ef FIOOK frKgtHG7 Lost..q 1 Li �
635. xl0 NOOK lL?1311NF) j,ab1A• -''6 Eala yvr.HILORION. .. EWlJj C.O[GC _�lO FI.LlOR.A)Mr1O1•L fAifad 11=b•�Yr'd �a�5�d— �, <,'.• _ I -
,t.•rA1V•E�rL-,.OLE/VSA S.I'YI.O a i-----+Ga�e o4c' TOJt n:GP+erl. ��,,.o -
1
JtYt+AREA -7' ---tea o 4
.e.ii •.L ii�: I
. tO+sF+lcifGJ rIR w_. .DEGI;3 '•.� 17 ` -
' � .. _ � OfGI:PfNGY R•'!a f41 .Cd^I.Ca•1�.' ; � � I� J I'
LV
_. .y LO nt'JM.,, 1. i I V iFl txLe+vl Y 1
\ .1
\ 0
\ 8 ^ G 2 8rOrrceR7 11 I ...... .-.
R=ar� wl d Y C
CL
o Y
Location Map
:. •s"`~ �• - 5bl O�.f1 IO
O/c J.iC i o-o Iti"- " .
.34AZ. let I dd O
.. r /a -i' `0 0 5 T �• 4:: .. I °i+w a 0�. .i �VL. xsr+�L' .. _ 4 ' .
::.o• i •off.' =t - .. - --- ''� I
Site �:`�/.+•✓c:t- .- o:(orocuwv- F.�I 4f'ls�s x' I _.
^"• ...r.-.. m,.,t,.o nr t•i � �; � i+ rO H3Ydi
•r
•�L:.. F ltt� yy,,// .� .Jj_ .N rD+�J llt �`..00' ^' _�V.
' � ti '•�' . .11 ^A'•a« 1r r!IGi/'V^I �'l'•M 9KCRwGVAY 1 .
•• !F' FH Rv�Y I '.'y�� J R•20� j LJ A
t • ••a. rR.�L'• l-.�4iG f �FTt.i'•..H FFk �
111
Baruna Lane I i •c
t 1 o I
t -------� — a ..
- Plot Plan �w
-J-- � I oa n wi_I.r o y. Vo-ltd
l I-- Le—dal •-• �l.br
I =Ntl � zf:Its 1 'oN-j Lot:
Tract: sw.
i
C P O O L ..
SGN6ARAGE ��� j
l.
I
I
yj ir<' I J ' 1 1 FW SEPVICH I _ I _ i �•
LIVING `IDININ°�' aaA -
'11 4-Kf
i �� � C � � �I 1 1 L_J I I 'I (�I .1 �—�V. � 1 I � .. �� • � 5
I
°I i 1
'ENTRY
It
c tV I a °. to
° 1st Floor Plan
Remodeled 1/4Fd'
sxUr O:
141 a1:4 w I
GVILOHT � u I
TBFSut+le
l�rsurt I
.. I. I FAIN
S!'lS1
mbr
O 000 - II
I � I ��Qo ��J m ba Ill < I�,;:.:i.:�•.:5 r�:;v'�� � s
V S r----�I`u11 il — I • a
dress - . I
_`'
_7 GAL ERM / I bLLSnn a Q,
-t p I
' • I m.Y]Ii I I Dom. .CONY•. .- �. .I► .I I _—
=-=� hall I NALL
�, BEDROOM
1 i
\� i br 3 e .
SITTINP � RECREATION/
-
br 2 - j EXERCISE
• ® LIBRART/CDNW' TER` }�• it li�i��;i��!1�JI�
i T c s1
3rd Floor Plan 2nd Floor Plan NewAd ition •yd'=T-d' Rrmotleled 1/s:Ad J11
'
I >
Fl,
r/ b
I+`P-
I Fr.ont
�' � t5�o �� i � ���•�,.�lt.�• ITS I - � � � . .. c 3
• , pp
Iltil,l II I,n I III I I.. :i Illt it I III I' \ wxle—orr wHire a;_:co
( I rae
GTiF-u�E/G.:et n.ec
, ,V•�-� � t - — - r`_ra�s�—arrM.are•rouo i
�_ LLL I � ..f�� � �•� �� IJT.�,e i 1i �1 ; I � �F' � QR;Y.t:G�fc�Qltikt j:
I i. I -,�.�'.� •y.: _i I! k I 1 6 _ !� f - :.:Eery
ttte
�� I
n
Li eew. - -
`. ,•..,• r,l?fE: LPNGHiG'iL.tf'-`ems-+brw� j
+at cGFyyFto. Right Side rrrxuoaY In
R:t •.tG/f/TE G If 6c�fII.IG yrv-y..Hi 70 RY,lr�l
• Exterior Elevations -Mj-ILo � ci
n
•r.
r,
T�
t .!�• \ Ill �YI
" R
m
o �
a .
ti
I IN
CO
DAT-
CM. T11OMSON,INC
" 0 Jim Sche „ rau.on e,e uto —
u.a�fFur
nw wuu
_a
B-4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO - PrI;" DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.
90-1
APPLICANT: DR. JAMES SCHELL
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington
Harbour)
Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 in conjunction with Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1 is a request to permit the remodel and
addition to an existing 2, 140 square foot, two-story single family
residence with a two car garage on Davenport Island in Huntington
Harbour. The addition includes a 2, 000 square foot third story
addition. Section 9110.4(a) of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code
states that the Planning Commission may approve building heights of
thirty (30) feet and/or three (3) stories pursuant to the
conditional use permit process.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
The proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California Environmental Quality Act.
COASTAL STATUS:
The proposed remodel and addition to an existing two-story single
family residence is located within the appealable area of the
coastal zone. Therefore, Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1 has
been prepared in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 .
Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25, it is
necessary for the Planning Commission to review and act on Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 and Coastal Development
Permit No. 90-1 with findings and conditions of approval .
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED
James J. Schell, 16872 Baruna Lane, applicant, spoke in support of
the request. He said he has accomplished all guidelines imposed on
him by staff and urged the Commission to approve.
Joe Rosen, 16915 Edgewater Lane, Association member, spoke in
opposition to the request. He said the plans are not harmonious
with surrounding residences since the CC&Rs limit the homes to one
and two stories.
.. ..,DRAFT .
E
PC Minutes - 2/21/90 -8- (5120d)
BRA'
Lewis Goldenson, 16831 Baruna Lane, representing several homeowners,
spoke in opposition to the proposed three story home. He said the
plans have not been reviewed by the Architectural Board of his
Homeowners Association and that the CC&Rs specifically say one and
two story homes . He feels the Architectural Committee should have
reviewed the plans before being presented to the City. He would
like to see more cooperation between the City and the Homeowners
Association.
There were no other persons present to speak for or against the
request and the public hearing was closed.
The Commission felt that because the proposed remodel and addition
did not propose any windows along the north elevation or any roof
decks that no infringement of privacy existed upon the adjacent
property owners. In addition the Commission noted that the proposed
addition met all code requirements for the Low Density Residential
and Coastal zones.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY MOUNTFORD, SECOND BY KIRKLAND, TO APPROVE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25 AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.
90-1, WITH FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BY THE FOLLOWING
VOTE:
AYES: Leipzig, Mountford, Williams, Ortega, Kirkland,
Bourguignon, Shomaker
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
MOTION PASSED
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 89-25:
1. The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2,000 square foot third floor will not
have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare,
safety and privacy of persons working or residing in the
vicinity or will not be detrimental to the value of the
property and improvements in the vicinity. As proposed the
third story addition without windows or roof deck will not
affect the adjacent neighborhood. In addition, the proposed
remodel will increase the property values of the existing home
and the surrounding neighborhood.
2. The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor is
compatible with existing or proposed uses in the vicinity and
has anticipated the age and permanence of the existing
subdivision which was built in 1963 .
nth
rat'-
1J
PC Minutes - 2/21/90 -9- (5120d)
3 . The location, site layout an esign of the proposed
remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a 2, 000 square foot third floor is properly
related to the streets, drive and other structures and uses in
the vicinity in a harmonious manner. The proposed building is
provided with additional front building offsets, adequate side
and rear yard setbacks and will be provided with a three-car
garage. Also, the proposed remodel will not affect the channel
to the east, the park to the west, or the homes across
Davenport Lane.
4 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a 2,000 square foot third floor is
consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach
General Plan.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL - COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO, 90-1:
1. The remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal Development
Permit No. 90-1 conforms with the plans, policies, requirements
and standards of the Coastal Element.
2 . The remodel/addition to an existing two-story single family
residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal Development
Permit No. 90-1 is consistent with the CZ suffix, low density
residential development standards, as well as other provisions
of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the
property.
3 . Coastal Development Permit No. 90-1, at the time of occupancy,
the proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a third floor will provide infrastructure
in a manner that is consistent with the C-LUP.
4 . The proposed remodel/addition to an existing two-story single
family residence with a third floor as proposed by Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1 conforms with the public access and
public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California
Coastal Act.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1. The site plan, floor plans, and elevations received and dated
February 5, 1990, shall be the conceptually approved layout.
2 . Prior to submittal for building permits, the applicant/owner
shall complete the following:
a. Elevations shall depict colors and building materials
proposed.
b. The site plan shall include all conditions of approval
imposed on the project printed verbatim.
F
v [
PC Minutes - 2/21/90 -10- URA'
(5120d)
ItRAv
3 . The Public Works Departmen-f requirements are as follows :
a. The water service to the home shall have a Water Division
approved back-flow prevention system.
4 . Fire Department Requirements are as follows :
a. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be approved and
installed pursuant to Fire Department regulations .
b. The applicant shall meet all applicable local, State and
Federal Fire Codes, Ordinances, and standards.
5 . The development shall comply with all applicable provisions of
the Ordinance Code, Building Division, and Fire Department.
6 . All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and
other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an
off-site facility equipped to handle them.
7. Construction shall be limited to Monday - Saturday 7:00 AM to
8 :00 PM. Construction shall be prohibited Sundays and Federal
holidays .
8 . Prior to final building permit approval or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, the following shall be completed:
a. All improvements (including landscaping) to the property
shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans
and conditions of approval specified herein.
b. Compliance with all conditions of approval specified herein
shall be accomplished.
9 . Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25 and Coastal Development Permit
No. 90-1 shall become null and void unless exercised within one
(1) year of the date of final approval, or such extension of
time as may be granted by the Planning Commission pursuant to a
written request submitted to the Planning Department a minimum
30 days prior to the expiration date.
B-5 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 89-443/C TIONAL EXCEPTION
VARIANCE NO. 89-65/NEGATIVE D ATION NO. 0-3
APPLICANT: ROBERT STELLRECH
LOCATION: 7841 Glencoe th side of Glencoe, west of Beach
Boulevard) 4'
Tentative Parcel Map No. 8 43, Conditional Exception (Variance)
No. 89-65 and Negative D ration No. 90-3 is a request for the
subdivision of a 110 fo y 135 foot parcel into two parcels, one
with 60 feet of fronta nd one with 50 feet of frontage. The
PC Minutes - 2/21/90 -11- (5120d)
:iT`Y..G1'E.
• ''���Ti1�G-rr�8r C;;
l Ckt_;r,
March 20, 1990 �,
Ju
To: Huntington Beach Mayor, Tom Mays, and City Council
ss
From: James J Schell M.D.
16872 Baruna Lane
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649
Subject: Appeals of Planning Commission Approval of Conditional
Use Permit #89-25 and Coastal Development Permit #90-1
As the applicant who has received approval of subject permits by
the planning and coastal commissions with said permits now the
subject of appeal, I would like to take the opportunity to briefly
• respond to the twelve causes for appeal.
Most of the cause for appeal focus around the third story with
references to "Not Harmonious" "Inappropriate" , "Invasion of Rights" ,
a "Dangerous Precedent" , and the inappropriateness of "Double
Standards" .
It would appear that the appealants are unaware of . the 'miiltiple three
story homes currently in existaince in Huntington Harbour as well as
the authority of the planning commission to grant such permits under
the City of Huntington Beach code section 9110. 1 (c) : " The following
uses may be permitted subjec"t to a conditional use permit by the Plan-
ning Commission" . Huntington Beach code section 9110. 2 (2) "Building
Heights between_ Twenty Five (25) and Thirty (30) Feet, and/or Third
Stories pursuant to Section 9110.4 (a) " .
Our plans have changed significantly since the origional plans were
• presented one near aqo. An additional garage space was provided to
reduce impact upon the street and several setbacks were provided to
reduce the impact upon existing homes. Each and every chancre reflected
consideration for neighborhood impact.
• We occupy a unique space in that we: (1) Front a City Beach, City
Parking lot, and Marina accross the channell from our home, (2)
Occupy the intersection of Davenport and Baruna and (3) Front a City
Park opposite the street side of the home. The increased distance from
the waterside and streetside adjacent homes is similar to that of a
Main Channel home on the .waterfront side and improved impact circumstance
on the streetside in compariaon to a main channel home. Essentially
I
we impact only one adjacent neighbor who is in support of our improve-
ments. The appended photographs illustrate our referenced setting as
well as the line of sight wiew toward our home from each of the appel-
lant' s homes.
The Davenport Island Home Owners Association is a voluntary organization.
Because of the distrubing positions taken by this association as well
as the questionable cause for objection to homeowners improvements, I
have elected not to join the Davenport Association. As a result I am
not subject to their review. Should they review my plans, they would
• find our improvement does not exceed the CC&R and City Code limitations
of 30 feet. In reviewing this organization' s Bylaws, I fould the CC&R':s
to specify that their Board of Directors and Architectural Revlew com-
mittee suport all City of Huntington Beach Codes and regulations.
Our proposed improvements have undergone careful scrunity and are in
compliance with all codes and regulations, hence by their own ByLaws,
we are in compliance with the CC&R' s.
The appellant's have disagreed with our permit approval because "it
call for a two foot variance and reduction of the front yard setbacks" .
Surely the group that desires first architectrual review rights recog-
nized our tracts were developed with twenty foot provisions and that
the plans reflect' an /las is" setback. All improvements , hence street
visibility will remain the same.
I will not comment upon "The City of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated
the capability to handle situations where multifamilies reside in property
• approved or zoned for single families" or the cities ability to assess
engineering requirements or architectruial worthiness. I will state
-w
•
that even the most cursory review of our plans would reflect it' s
intended single family usage. Throughout the evolving plan development
timeframe, I found the City' s Staff to be both diligent and concerned;
concerned not only with City Codes, but also to future environmental
needs, and especially impact upon neighbors. I am confident the City' s
Staff will ensure we provide adequant Engineering and Archictectural
Development compatible with our enviroment.
I can appreciate many residents desire a Status Quo. But as elderly
resident depart from the _Harbour, they are being replaced with younger
owners with families. The existing housing- does not provide adequate
bedrooms or family areas for a family of the ninety' s. The cost of land
require a thoughtful development to ensure the improvement cost are
eventually returned to the homeowner. This is not speculation but a
prudent family head ensuring his family's needs are met and the monies
• spent on improvements,will be returned upon sale, when the children
have moved on to head their own household.
I would remind those who desire the Status Quo, that we are dealing
with twenty five year old homes with twenty five year old improvements.
Improvements in the Huntington Harbour are inevitable and the City of
Huntington Beach has ensured these improvements are occuring according
to code, are concerned with future environmental needs, and give a great
deal of thought about impact upon the existing neighborhood. Accordinaly,
I urge City Council to deny these appeals.
Z
a y,
Schell M.D.
JANES J SCHELL
10672 BARUNA LN ��� - 3/1s.r�
HUNTINGTON EEA CA 92649 4+�
•. �p6�WlYi"�R EDG2-wA' � •
D I I-(1
V 25 T
o�
I I/�/ � e•A,
�D�EWaTYx-
�.
�, n
A)
N I A
O ��
' G 2
`! f 'l.L
T- -
I�.j
�611�L IESI b8z 4831., 168y ��-
lbFJSZ
/M
L ee
&) '!
--- '8 -►-u � 2' � 3S3 L"
•
The following photographs reflect:
(1) The applicant' s unique setting across from a beach, City
Parking Lot, Marina, City Park, and occupying a corner lot.
Reviewwill illustrate why the improvements fail to impact the
neighborhood with the exception of one adjacent home, the
owner of which is in full support of our improvements.
(2) Line of sight views from the appellant' s homes. Many photo-
graphs were excluded because the appellant' s were remote to
our location and to avoid irrelevant views. Review will clearly
demonstrate the lack of impact upon the appellant' s.
Index of Photographs
• (1) View across the- marina to the nearest homes. The distance is
similar to a main channell spacing.
(2) View across the City beach toward the applican' s home.
(3) View from Davenport bridge toward Baruna neighboring homes to
the north illustrating that no waterfront homes view will be
impared.
(4) View across applicant' s pool toward Davenport side neighbor
illustrating that rrees block the view of the house to the rear
of the garage. This neighbor is not an appellant.
(5) View from front of applicant'd house toward Davenport side
neighbor. An existing wall blocks their view.
(6) View across the park area abutting Finisterre. The homes
• vivible on Finisterre are not appellants,
(7) View from appellant' s house across the City Park. Note the
hedges obstructing most windows of the homes on Seawitch.
•
(8) Northwest view across park dimonstrating the obstruction of the
northwest Baruna neighbors view by existing foliage.
(9) View illustrating the separation from the neighbor adjacent
to two the north. Note the absence of windows. This is the only
neighbor to be impacted and he is in support of our improvements.
(10) Front view of the immediate neighbor illustrating the same setback
with good front allignment and the lack of front impact upon this
home as the result of tge improvements.
(11) View toward applicant' s home from north side appellant' s home.
(12) View toward applicant' s home from norht side appellant' s home.
(13) View toward applicant' s home from Baruna north side appellant' s
• home.
(14) View toward applicant' s home from Baruna north side appellant' s
home.
(15) View northwest appellant' s home with foliage obstructing view
of applicant' s home. Note the absence of windows in the appelant' s
home adjacent to the first house.
(16) View of applicant' s home from appellant' s home northwest on Baruna
(17) View of applicants home from an appellant' s home northwest on
Baruna.
(18) View of applicant's home from an appellant' s home southeast on
Baruna. Note that Baruna has angled causing adjacent houses
to obstruct the line of sight and further blockage created by
• the foliage.
(19) View towar- applicant' s home from an appellant' s home southeast
on Baruna.
. (20) View illustrating foliage obstructing Davenport appellant' s
view toward applicant' s home. The appellant is east of the beach
in photograph (2) .
(21) View of applicant' s home from an appellant ' s home on North side
of Finistere. Note the single story' s line of sight is blocked
by an existing home and the park is beyond this home.
(22) Foliage obstructing Legend Circle, appellant' s view of applicant' s
home.
(23) Finisterre appellant' s view toward applicant' s home.
(24) Finisterre appellant's view toward applicant' s home.
(25) Sirius appellant' s view toward applicant' s home. The` .
angle in Baruna coupled with foliage preclude any line of site
• view of applicant's home..
(26) Bolero appellant' s view toward applicant ' s hone. Note the existing
two story to the rear of appellant' s one story home blocking any
potential view of applicant's home.
(27) Bolero appellant' s view toward applicant' s home with absence of
any possibility of viewiyig applicant' s home.
(28) Davenport Island three story home with construction in progress.
Several appellant' s have this home within their line of sight view,
hence are aware of the existing of three story homes in Huntington
Harbour.
NOTICE -OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL 04 PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
lhold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Centex, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California , on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
r statements. of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT : Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION : 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE : Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REQUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2 , 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
. 15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
} ?6sp_ See- 0-/Xe w- .S We--.1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be "in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved . There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten ( 10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
j
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street ,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
mvvEQ 30 S�
C, CLERK
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: ctTY of March 2, 1990
HU1iTINf;TC'i U=t Cti,CALIF
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the pro : an glan �e>he two - two story
residences into three storyresidences at 16872 Baruna Lane, . d a 1 9 Ardsley Circle, H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.Therefore,we are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and.an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home sets a
dangerous precedence,and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community. Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan were the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30) feet in
building height.No three story residences were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height.
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore, we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion.
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to
a different one.
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste,and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum,environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Baruna Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard set back. This comer is the.single ingress and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
corner is almost blind 'at present. Any further encroachment we believe_could be a hazard to all Island
residents; especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park, which is across
the street.
12. Although not the stated intent of the applicants to convert the third.floor addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction favors subsequent owners to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores, and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Residence Signature
,t
i
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two - two story
residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley Circle, H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved. Therefore, we are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home sets a
dangerous precedence, and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community.Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan where the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30)feet in
building height.No three story residences were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height. I
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore,we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion.
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to
a different one.
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste,and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum,environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Banura Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard set back. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
comer is almost blind at present. 'Any further encroachment we believe could be a hazard to all Island
residents; especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park, which is across
the street.
12. Although not the-stated-intent of the applicants to convert the third floor.addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction- favors subsequent owners to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores,and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name Residence Signature
Ka'A CA,Ac-cc VC le-
s:�a%�'tir.�icf
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two - two story
residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley_Circle,H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.Therefore,we are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-,1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the:reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the constriction of any three story home sets a---
dangerous precedence, and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community.Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan where the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30)feet in
building height.No three story residences were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height.
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through 4 use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore,we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to
a different one. -
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve.and modernize_their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste,and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum,environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Banma Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard setback. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
comer is almost blind at present. Any further encroachment we believe could be a hazard to all Island
residents;especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park,which is across .
the street.
12. Although-not the stated intent of the applicants to convert the third-floor addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction favors subsequent owners to make 'such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores,and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name CAOtJU4
Residence Si ature
J ew�� 1 len CiC `
i
i
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned,have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two - two story
residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley.Circle, H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.Therefore,we are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-:1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/.costal'development permit#89-32 for the some or all of_the.reasons stated below..
1. These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or:compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home sets a
dangerous precedence,and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community.Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan where the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30) feet in
building height.No three story residences were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height.. .
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to'authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore, we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single-family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that.all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion. -
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to . .
a different one.
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize_their homes. We believe that.such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste,and consistent with the cuntnt architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum,environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Baruna Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard setback. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
comer is almost blind at present. Any further encroachment we believe could be.a hazard to all Island
residents; especially to children who run occasionally into the.street while playing in the park,which is across
the street.
12. Although-nof the stated intent of the applicants to convert the third-floor addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction favors subsequent owners to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores, and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name Residence Signature
pis e,t
i
To Huntington Beach.Mayor,Tom.Mays,and City Council: March 2,-1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two - two story
residences into three story.residences,at.16872.Banma Lane, H.B:and at.16391 Ardsley,Circle; H.B.. We, j
the home.owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three,story homes will be an imposition on, -
the residences of Huntington Harbour and.should not be approved.-Therefore,.we are appealing the.Planning ;
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development.peimit#.90-1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the:reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not..harmonious,.befitting,.or:.compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington,Harbour home
owners property rights.
3.. The home owners of Huntington-Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home-sets a-----
dangerous precedence,and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community.Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan where the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30) feet in
building height.No three story residences were built. ,. . . . _ . . ..
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to.building height. . .,
S. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour.' To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting;is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore, we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it Is in the '
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change-the current architectural environment
from' one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
'effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion.
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to.change from the present environment to
a different one.
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize.their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste, and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum,environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Banina Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard setback. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all.Davenport Island residents.The .
comer is almost blind at present. Any further encroachment we believe could be.a hazard to all Island
residents;especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park,which is across
the street.
12. Although-not the stated intent of the applicants to convert the third-floor addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction favors subsequent into
to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores,and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name Residence Signature
tAN JE )6312 CONTENT CI
1
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2,.1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two T. two story
residences into three story residences at 1687.2 Banuia Lane, H.B. and at 16391'Ardsley;Circle,H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these.enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.Therefore,.we.are appealing the planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the.reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not,harmonious,.befitting, or:compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home-sets a ;
dangerous precedence,and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community.Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan where the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30)feet in
building height.No three story residences were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height.
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to-authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the.Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore,we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that.it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment'•--
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to ...
a different one. r
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve.and modernize their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste,and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum,environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Banina Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard setback. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all.Davenport Island residents.The_
corner is almost blind at present. -Any further encroachment we believe could be.a hazard to all Island
residents; especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park,'which is across..
the
the street.
12. Although-not the stated intent of the applicants to convert the third=floor addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction favors subsequent owners to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores,and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name Residence Signature
Lapq �-R2 /632 Cvnr�✓T Ch2 .
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two - two story
residences into three story residences at 16872 Batuna.Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley Circle, H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved. Therefore,we are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home sets a
dangerous precedence,and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community. Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan where the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30)feet in
building height.No three story residences were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height.
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of-property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore, we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion.
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to
a different one.
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste,and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum,environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Barvna Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard set back. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
corner is almost blind at present. Any further encroachment we believe could be a hazard to all Island'
residents;especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the pant, which is across
the street.
12. -Although not the stated intent of the applicants to-convert the third floor addition into an.apartment and-
-multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction--favors subsequent owners to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores,and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name Residence Signature
/C 'Oeo T J�-A4kE L Zom Z50/.t_ p-402
f
MAZY t U/ Ius0f4 I b8Z( Utzi x LANE ,
a
i
1
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two - two story
residences into three story residences at 16872 Banuta Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley Circle, H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved. Therefore,we.are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home sets a
dangerous precedence, and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community. Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan were the building j
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30)feet in i
building height.No three story residences were built. r
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height.
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore, we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion.
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two think majority vote to change from the present environment to
a different one.
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if it is done in good taste, and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum, environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Baruna Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard set back. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
corner is almost blind at present. Any further encroachment we believe could be a hazard to all Island
residents; especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park,which is across
the street.
12. Although not-thestated intent-of the applicants to convert the third-floor addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, -we believe this-type of construction favors subsequent owners to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores, and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name Residence Signature
o ( QO7 Sea W.`� 1 n,
Lati; by C& 9Z6
WO 0-1 L t4 CiT ota NMO AA QW-cq- .4Kq
o -� L t--1 CA
i f
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two - two story
residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley Circle, H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.Therefore,we are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home sets a
dangerous precedence, and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community.Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan were the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30)feet in
building height.No three story residences were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height. i
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to.decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights. ,
7. Furthermore, we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion.
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to
a different one.
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste, and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum, environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Baruna Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard set back. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
comer is almost blind at present. Any further encroachment we believe could be a hazard to all Island
residents; especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park, which is across
the street.
12.- Although not the stated intent of the applicants to convert the third-floor addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, we believe this type .of construction favors subsequent owners to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores,and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name Residence Signature
E r- Gk -opm-
gT44 ?q s- 130 L,�-RO
w
i
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two - two story
residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley Circle, H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved. Therefore,we are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home sets a
dangerous precedence, and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community. Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan where the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30) feet in
building height.No three story residences were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height.
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change-the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of.property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore,we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion.
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to
a different one.
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste,and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe,as a minimum,environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Baruna Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard set back. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
comer is almost blind at present. -Any further encroachment we believe could be a hazard to all Island
residents;especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park, which is across
the street.
12. Although not the stated intent of the applicants to-convert the third floor addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction favors subsequent owners to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores,and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name Residence Signature
J q ca-- c0,tvs 3>
i
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two - two story
residences into three story residences at 16872 Batuna Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley Circle, H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.Therefore,we are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home sets a
dangerous precedence, and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community. Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan were the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30) feet in
building height.No three story residences were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height.
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights. ;
7. Furthermore, we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story &sidences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their-opinion. \1 ' '
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to
a different one. '
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste, and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum, environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Baruna Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard set back. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
corner is almost blind at present. Any further encroachment we believe could be a hazard to all Island
residents; especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park, which is across
the street.
12. Although-not the stated intent of ihe:applicants to convert the-third floor addition into an apartment and =
multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction favors subsequent owners to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores,and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name Residence Signature
v�-1 /7a ZZ��vNA L nr_
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -two story
residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley Circle, H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will be an imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.Therefore, we are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional
use permit #89-57/costal development permit#89-32 for the some or all of the reasons stated below.
1. These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the construction of any three story home sets a
dangerous precedence, and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance of the Harbour
community.Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan where the building
height was restricted to one and two story buildings and no two-story dwelling or garage exceed (30) feet in
building height.No three story residences were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height.
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore, we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion.
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to
a different one.
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize their homes. We believe that such
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste, and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum, environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Baruna Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard set back. This comer is the single ingress and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
corner is almost blind at present. Any further encroachment we believe could be a hazard to all Island
residents; especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park,which is across
the street.
12. Although not the stated intent of the applicants to convert the third floor addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction favors subsequent owners to make such
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores,and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
Name Residence Si tore
lOIw kw, L. A SSW 6 37-%ZuwA, w1xv—. r,
CES GoLyMj6cpyz 3,4teum Ay,
1
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two - two story
residences into three story residences at 68�1 72 Banma Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley Circle, H.B.. We,
the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story homes will`N a imposition on
the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.Therefore,we are appealing the Planning
Commission approval of condidio gorse permit#89i25/-coastal development_pen nit#90-1 and conditional
use permit_#_89-57/costal development_permit-#89732.for tl�e some or all of the reasons stated below. il
1.These three story residence designs are not harmonious, befitting, or compatible with the current
surrounding neighborhood.
2. We believe all three story residences are inappropriate and an invasion of all Huntington Harbour home ;
owners property rights.
3. The home owners of Huntington Harbour believe that the constriction of any three story home sets a
dangerous precedence, and a major change to the one and two story architectural appearance-of the Harbour
community.Huntington Harbour property was constructed based upon an architectural plan were the building
height was restricted to one and two story-buildings and no_two_story_dwellin or garage exceed (30)feet in
building height. _o three_story_resid&nc76 were built.
4. We believe all Huntington Harbour residences should be treated equal. We believe it is inappropriate to
have a double standard in regards to building height.
5. We do not believe the planning commission should have the arbitrary and capricious right to change the
architectural setting of the Harbour,through the use of special use permits,to authorize three story residences.
6. We believe that all Huntington Harbour property owners have a right to decide whether or not to change the
architectural appearance of the Harbour. To incrementally change the architectural setting of the Harbour,
without due deliberation and voting,is in fact denying the majority of property owners equal rights.
7. Furthermore, we believe that if the Planning Commission and/or the City Council believe that it is in the
best interest of the property owners of Huntington Harbour to change the current architectural environment
from one and two story single family residences to that of one, two, and three story residences, that all
effected property owners should be queried and allowed to voice their opinion.
8. We believe that any such poling of the property owners for a possible change in the architectural
environment and standards should require a two thirds majority vote to change from the present environment to
a different one.
9. We do encourage our Harbor neighbors to improve and modernize their homes. We believe that such ��,�;'� ��'
additions and modernization efforts can and do significantly improve the value of the surrounding property,if
it is done in good taste,and consistent with the current architectural plan and setting for the neighborhood.
10. We are deeply concerned that any and all three story construction,especially adjacent to the seawall,could
prove to be detrimental to the load bearing strength of the seawall (cement caissons), especially during
moments of great stress, such as during an earth quake. The seawall surrounds the land and islands and
protects property owners from the sea. We believe, as a minimum, environmental impact studies should be
conducted to assess these and other issues brought about by any architectural change to the community.
11. We further disagree with the 16872 Banana Lane plan as it calls for a 2 foot variance and reduction in the
front yard set back. This comer is the single ingmss and egress point for all Davenport Island residents.The
comer is almost blind at present. Any further encroachment we believe could be a hazard to all"Island
residents; especially to children who run occasionally into the street while playing in the park, which is across
the street.
12. Although-not the stated intent of the applicants to convert-the third floor addition into an apartment and
multifamily residence, we believe this type of construction favors subsequent owners to make such-
conversions. We are very concerned that Huntington Harbour go the way of Newport Harbour, Belmont
Shores, and other such communities that have permitted third flour construction in residential neighborhoods.
To our knowledge the city of Huntington Beach has not demonstrated its capability to handle situations where
multifamilies reside in property approved and zoned for single families.
N e Reside J Signatuye
Y
I
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two-
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane,H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We, the home owners of Huntington Harbour, feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.
Therefore,we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit #89-57/costal development permit
#89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence Signature
/6Je6-7, -IE9 01*11 IWAg
3-722 �n s terre
OA cfS 3 9 P R
i
Rh e
PDX M
tMC+yr,Z 1� h)
�. I nn 9 t � 1
Uo83 SA.
t
r L 3
dtSAl^i� �',_ St�n2 UAS2 1-3ARUN& LANQ�
}
i
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We,the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Barura Lane,H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We,the home owners of Huntington Harbour, feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.
Therefore,we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit #89-57/costal development permit
#89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence Signature
i
LfI/,G' Z9%ll9/A6£C7 `% % % wea�-4 —11
3,99 L
F
i
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two-
two story residences into three story residences at_16872 Baruna Lane,H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We,the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.
Therefore,we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit #89-57/costal development permit
#89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence Signature
L. / Gam''�� �B/� �✓/a- �i✓
7o Z ed vz�'
I
,
' C
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We,the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane,H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We,the home owners of Huntington Harbour, feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.
Therefore,we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit #89-57/costal development permit
#89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence Signature
RALPH I %i-tam P.Sau 1476 2 GA9V JA LAAlE q j .�
Uo a if [3 A 2 L)&
v
i
i
i
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We,the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane,H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We, the home owners of Huntington Harbour, feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved. I
Therefore,we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/ {
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit #89-57/costal development permit
#89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence Signature
III r 4.4 .1_(?.A nw Pbfc-'- /L 2i �. ,vs� 14 v—,
j�
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We,the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Baiuna Lane,H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We, the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.
Therefore,we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit #89-57/costal development permit
#89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence Signature
v�`v o/pirc.� y
i
t
f�
+i
3j
1
1
i
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We,the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Banana Lane,H.B. and at 16391•Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We, the home owners of Huntington Harbour, feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.
Therefore,we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit #89-57/costal development permit
#89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence Signature
.G � 17 e L/a t?A41-� f ��
�-�
9S2 f3ke0N1# c.N
V0, C MCS 3 L-e ,ewok (
Ea ward, twwAA ti Z5 -3a l Le rvjA Q t ✓- 4iw�
S'u rt vJ CUUAAMIW%S 3 a Lj L I-eza wof ttv
Q ,
' t
i
I
t __
r
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We,the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Bar uia Lane,H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle,H.B.. We,the home owners of Huntington Harbour, feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.
Therefore,we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/ !
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit #89-57/costal development permit
#89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence ` Signature
AIICo LAA� M, EMC(E I.,;,sZ CA-RoUSF-L LtV
71
4;eA
j�
r � r
14-
!S
f
J .
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We,the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Banma Lane,H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We,the home owners of Huntington Harbour, feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.
Therefore,we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit #89-57/costal development permit
#89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence Signature
cJr:n
. JJ
.. GZrO"\ •� lChO��dyl �J� GCl/el'1 d �.
SS
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays,and City Council: March 2, 1990
We,the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane,H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We,the home owners of Huntington Harbour,feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.
Therefore,we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit#89-25/
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit #89-57/costal development permit
#89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
i
Name Residence Signature
Co ��r-la.vvu
1
i
i
1
rs
CL)
cz) P
NOTICE T0: THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM: THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
THE AP LISTS FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR
NOTIFICATION MAILINGS BY THE CITY CLERK MUST BE
THE LATEST AVAILABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH DIVISION
T.HBOC REOUIREMENT9.
***
***PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE 'LIST MAY HAVE CHANGED
SINCE THE MAILING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING WAS SENT.
DA T E 3< Lu / 9d
fffFlATURE VERIFYING ADEQUACY OF LIST
i
AP: 178-375-14
Jp.MES--R. SOLUM, TR.
16842 BARUNA LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP: 178-375-15
DONALD P. SWARTZ
16852 BARUNA LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP : 178-375-16
LEONARD M. LILLY, 3RD, TR
16872 BOLSA CHICA, #1
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP: 178-375-17 AND 18 Z
HUNTINGTON HARBOUR CORP. '
4241 WARNER AVENUE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92647
AP: 178-311-01 AND 02 AP: 178-315-01 AP : 178-363-63 AND 64
HUNTINGTON HARBOUR CORP. R O N A L D S T. P I E R R E HUNTINGTON HARBOUR CORP.
42'41 WARNER AVENUE 16892 BARUNA LANE 4241 WARNER AVENUE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92647
AP : 178-312-01 AP: 178-315-02 AP: 178-374-01 AND 02
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH CRAIG C. FERGUSON ALAN W. . HELLER
P.-O. BOX 190 16902 BARUNA LANE 16852 SEA WITCH LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP : 178-312-02 AP: 178-315-03 AP: 178-374-03
RALPH H. REIMER OLIVER J . FERGUSON ISIK UCER
16862 SEA--WITCH- LANE 16912 BARUNA LANE 16822 SEA WITCH LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP: 178-312-03 AP: 178-315-04 AP: 178-374-04
RONALD M. ASHER GEORGE T. COONEY ROBERT P . BERNFELD
16872 SEA WITCH LN. 16922 BARUNA LANE 16802 KAMALII DR.
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP: 178-312-04 AP: 178-315-05 AP: 178-374-07
HUNTINGTON HARBOUR CORP. JAMES K. G I BSON R O B E R T L . CHICK
225 BROADWAY, 7TH FLOOR 16932 BARUNA LANE 16811 BARUNA LANE
SAN DIEGO, CA. 92101 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP: 178-312-05 AP: 178-315-51 AND 52 AP: 178-374-08
H A F T A L I LEVY HUNTINGTON HARBOUR CORP.' M I L A J. C A M P B E L L
16878 SEA WITCH LANE 4241 WARNER AVENUE 16821 BARUNA LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP: 1.78-312-06 AP: 178-323-27 AND 28 AP: 178-374-09
MOSES TENG JOHN J. STANKO, TR. LEWIS W. GOLDENSON
16882 SEA WITCH LANE 16771 BOLERO LANE 16831 BARUNA LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92749 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP: 178-314-01 AP: 178-363-48 AP : 178-375-10
PETER F. MOURITZ JOHN THOMAS PAUGH, TR. PRESTON KING
3942 FINISTERRE DR. 4002 DIABLO CIRCLE 16802 BARUNA LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP: 178-314-02 AP: 178-363-49 AP : 178-375-11
HILDA L . WARDEN JEFFREY J. STANSFIELD CARL L . RANDOLPH, TR.
3932 FINISTERRE DR. 4022 DIABLO CIRCLE 16812 BARUNA LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP: 178-314-03 AP: 178-363-50 AP: 178-375-12
GRANT H. WILSON CAROLYN KOCH JONES OREN EUGENE LANGSTON., TR
3992 FINISTERRE DR. 4032 DIABLO CIRCLE 16822 BARUNA LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
AP: 178-314-36 AP: 178-363-62 AP: 178-375-13
EDWARD H. CUMMINGS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH WILLIAM E. KAVASCH
3941 LEGEND CIRCLE . P. 0. BOX 190 16832 BARUNA LANE
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92648
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA. 92649
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, April 2, 1990, 7: 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No. 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No. 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr. James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE: R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REQUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence. The addition includes a
2, 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
COASTAL STATUS: APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone.
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved. There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit. An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to:
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed. Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California -92648, . for inspection by the
public. A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above. If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271.
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2,3)
Div '^ ' "A s �1•r n at 4y.s S�i"r, y �,>> ��. '� +s to r`t! � i '` � -'' � ��
}
Y =1jld'Lt I Y Yf. I.,n�' f. yj :• ��
BEND Roll backing from label Apply just below top of folder tab BEND j
HERE�jiI VHE RE i.
_ J J2 S /%►., ice[ -;
7 —7 I '-7F.
UL
® � a
-',1.45 '/l�Ghr vY
/2 C L.
as
.. .. ..
yvz� //� 3co
MOM
//l
9
ids. 6T, LC'ri�
®I
Y t t f
�• ELK' ` r t t y,;L s
t
1:
® If-adhesive file folder labels
f ®Avery se
in typewriter. F1
Insert opposite end
E MAU Roll backing from 1607 Apply just below top of fold6ir tab. atnu. F-. DCAU Roll backing from label Apptj just below ioroflfofdi�iaC
HERE�l VHEFIIE HERE:�l 14HERE
H1 L bA L,\j A/Z P 4:,,,
James J. Schell
39 3 Z- 1T7i,v,'-r -'Z-t VE:
16872 Baruna Lane
1-4 r:�, f 4 9'2 1,Y 9
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649
Huntington Harbour Corp.
4241 Warner Ave ue Ci
Huntington BeacR., Calif. 92647 Cx 9 z-C-'V9
City of Huntington Beach CD i
L/ I D .2.C-4- L2
P.. 0. BOX 190
Ca- 92948 CA q 2-6 C/9
Huntington Beach
fig�q a andtilEnald Asher
;191" Seaw*l c Lane Ci Z 3 4 A
41 A? "7*
Huntincton Eeach , Ca. 92649 3 F.4Ci-f, 9 2-6
"J
Naftali and Fivka LEA7'y
1687e Sea-witch LarLE! G 9 c>
CE.Hunt e ington Bach,, C 2649 4, :FAC -I, e',110
C)L VtF�rZ- r-E,2-C,
Ralph and Carol Reimer �J
16M� Seawitch Lane -3 L
11V. J-4 0 "4-6 C-)/L, 6'q eo w, C"-V 19 ?Huntington Beach, Ca 92649
.10
M : :7
Tehg and Rcsnd tiOSE�S Y
16F82 ali
Sea-witch LartE!
---irkqt.c.n Beach.. , Ca. 92649 ev 6 , Cr L Y.7
F.i:-n-4L
Peter Y.ou r i t z A-
3942 Fin.isterre Drive 71�A
Buntdrqtort Bee.c:17.-. , Ca 92649 -7-,—6 7-4-1 13 0-4-C IF2-411�tl 17
1,A11 9&1 Z19
AVery 0 self-adhesive file folder labels AVery 0 self-adhesive file folder labels
Insert opposite end in typewriter. F Insert opposite end in typewriter. F'!;':
q
5,
q
,?1-3663
REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-52 7-9663
35-2345=. ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST -i=7�a=385=2345¢
1989-90 EDITION F 1 O
CITY OWNER ADDRESS / CARE OF EX-VST PARCEL NO. TYPE SQ.FT.-F UNITS SITUS ADDRESS CITY
VA
ZIP YEAR ROOM CT. DATE LAND VAL TFR VAL !
VAL_YRj HC/STS PHONE PARKING A P LOTSIZE DOCUMENT-; IMP VAL FULL VAL-YR
HTB 1 GARRETSON ROBERT D *17123 ROUNDHILL DR 1 7 8—2 9 2—1 9 RES 2620-3 17123 ROUNDHILL DR HTB
*HUNTINGTON* TINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1964 9-4-2.5 7/24/97 159 416 265 000-F
010-75 N TR 4880 LOT 107 ATACHD 6,700 87-421771-6 110,H4 270,100-88
HTB TIERRASAN(TA CX *8171 TOWNE CENTRE DR, 8 CO 1 7 8—3 0 1 —0 1 RES VAC-LAND 4121 WARNER AV HTB
*SAN DIEGO CA 92122 6/29/89 140,636 2 700,000-F
155-86 ' SEC 30 T 5 R 11 POR NE1/4 1.9 89-344147-G U0,636-75
* 17 8-3 01 —0 2 VAC-LAND SITUS PENDING
530-86 TR 5775 11.7 000000000
HTB i AHADPOUR FERYDOUN *AHADPOUR DORIS JT 1 7 8—3 0 1 —O 5 COM SITUS PENDING
*4121 WARNER AVE *HUNTINGT6N BEACH CA 92649 12/31/87 423 458
908-86 N TR 11881 LOT 7 87-293536-U 1,026,175 1,450,233-81 �
HTB AHADPOVR FEdYDOUN *AHADPOUR DORIS JT 1 7 8—3 0 1 —0 6 C014 VAC-LAND SITUS PENDING
*4121 WARNER AVE *HUNTI
0 NGTbNI BEACH,CA 92649 12/31/87 106,488 !
,,518-�F N TR 11881 LOT F 87-293536-U 106,488-87
HTB ' HUNTINGTON HARBOUR CORP *4241 WARNER AVE X-XF 1 7 8—3 1 1 —0 1 WHx VAC-LAND SITUS PENDING
! *FU TINGTN BCH CA 92647 2/29/74 88
516-841 TR 5264 LOT A 300Z INT - CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 0645000 88-75I
!
HTB HUNTIN6TON HARBOUR CORP *4241 WARNER AVE X-XF 1 7 8—3 1 1 —0 2 WHX VAC-LAND SITUS PENDING
,�000 4 *HUNTINGTN 9CH CA 92649 3/01/72 88
.>74-77; TR 5264 LOT D WE -EX WHARFAGE RIGHTS- 100Z INT - 098060956 88-75
HT9 ! SCHELL JAMES J *16872 BARUNA LN 1 7 8—3 1 1 —0 3 RES 288D-2 16872 BARUIW LN HTB
,000-Lj *HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1965 6-3-3.0 12/05/86 354 621 78 000-L
.957-75 ; TR 5264 LOT 1 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN ATACHD P 6,300 86-597739-6 163,498 518,119-87
HTB CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH *P 0 BOX 190 X-XX 1 7 8—3 1 2—0 1 WHX VAC-um 16831 BARUNA LN HTB
000-Ll *HINTINGTN BCH CA 92648 7/30/70 179,651
163-75 N TR 5050 LOT 119 30,000 ..-- 093600178 179,651-75
HTB REIMER RN" H *REIMER CAROL A H-JT 1 7 8—3 1 2—0 2 RES 2732-2 16862 SEAWITCH LN HTB
000-F *16862 SEAWITCH LN *HUNTINATON BEACH,CA 92649 1976 8-4-2.5 1/19/79 160 097 100 500-L
357-77 TR 5050 LOT 109 POR OF LOT (714) 840-1024, ATACHD A 5,850 130060227-G 110,267 270,164-79
HTB j ASHER RM" N *ASHER GLENDA L MW 1 7 8-3 1 2-0 3 RES 3248-2 16872 SEA WITCH LN HTB
I *16872 SEA WITCH LM *HUNTIAGTON BEACH CA 92649 1966 7-3-3.0 6/30/87 1" 184 320 000-F
:124-84M N TR 5050 LOT 108 ATACHD A 6,000 87-371812-6 143,439 342,923-87
HTB f HUNTINGTON HARBOUR COW *225 BROADWAY 7TH FLOOR BL . 1 7 8-3 1 2-0 4 RES VAC-LAND .16878 SEA WITCH LN HTB
*SAN DIEGO CA 92101 137.
'+22-84� TR 5050 LOf 107 NWLY 1.50 FT 15,000 137-75
HTB LEVY NAFTAU . . *LEVY RIVKA HW 1 7 8—3 1 2—0 5 RES 2596-2 16878 SEA WITCH LN HTB
,000-L *16878 SEA WITCH LN *HUNRfNGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1970 8- 2.5 8/29/87 242 516. 385 000-F
310-881 T4 5050 LOT 107 ALL -EX IWLY 1.50 FT- ATACHD 5,851 87-489785-6 . 150,E84 392,W88
HTB I TENS MOSES *TENS ROSALIND JT 1 7 8—3 1 2—0 6 RES 2180-1 16882 SEA WITCH LN HTB
*16882 SEA WITCH lrl *HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1965 8-4-2.5 11/pq/79 142 025 85 0pp-� `
00-88q N TR 5132 LOT 69 ATACHD 7,000 133881631-6 112,193 254,418-80�
-1 .x
Cp�•�WI pow MK
.'7-966.' - REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
S-2345fr
ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST y
- REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES
7-9663i - 1-800-527-4663
35-2345= 0 R A N G E . 0 0 0 N T Y PARCEL LIST _7I4=3e5--23as'
.1989-90 EDITION. G 1 0
o I
CITY ' OWNER ADDRESS / CARE OF EX-VST PARCEL NO. TYPE SA.FT.-F UNITS SITUS ADDRESS CIT1
ZIP YEAR RQOM CT. DATE LAND VAL TFR VAL
UAL HC/STS PHONE PARKING A P LOTSIZE DOCUMENT-X IMP VAL FULL VAL-YR
UAL-YR
ROWSELL ARTHUR P *16861 SEA WITCH LN H-JT 1 7$—3 1 3—O 1 RES 2705-2 16861 SEA WITCH LN HTB
H7B *HLNTINGTN BCH CA 92649 1970 8-5-3.0 10/29/71 24 760 58 000-F
,242-81 N TR 5050 LOT (714) 846-2072 ATACHD P .6,000 098680070 66,J32 91,692-75
HTB i GOLDSTEIN LESTER *GOLDSTEIN DEANNA HW 1 7 8—3 1 3—O Z RES 2654 2 16871 SEA WITCH LN HTS
5,000-F *10892 MARIETTA AVE *CULVER CIfY,CA 90232 1968 . 9-3-2.5 9/22/87 248 238 349 000-F
.221-82 N TR 5.050 LOT 90 ATACHD 6,000 87-532694-6 107,`l42 355,W88
HTS RYBA JAWS R *16881 SEAWITCH LN JT 1 7 8—3 1 3—0 3 RES 3432-2 16881 SEA WITCH LN HT9
*HUYTINGM BCH CA 92649 1970 10-4-3.0 . 6/05/75 43 691
,078-864 N TR 5050 LOT 41 ATACHD P 6,000 114210346 81,073 125,664-76
ELLISON WERLIN FRANKLIN *2ND TR H-TR 1 7 8—3 1 3—0 4 RES' 2388'-2 3911 FINISTERRE DR HTB
HTB i *3911 FINISTERRE DR *HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 1965 8-4-2.5 8/13/84 26 404
J,000-0 F � N TR 5132 LOT 68 (714) 846r3436 ATACHD P 7,455 84-334755-H 56,927 83,031-75
.679-8 �
KIRKLMD SCOTT F *3891 FINISTERRE DR HW 1 7 8—3 1 3—0 S RES 1959-1 3891 FINISTERRE DR HTB
0� i *HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1%5 7-3-2.0 6/09/89 161 657 430 000-F
�25-87j N TR 5132 LOT 67 ATACHD 6,090. 89--303576r6 103,l18 264,075-84
MOORE CARL A *3881 FINISTERRE DR H-BL 1 7 8—3 1 3—0 6 RE gg Z361-1 3881 FINISTERRE DR HTB
.59 7HTS *HUYTINGTN BCN,CA 92649 1965 8-4-3.0 26 452
7 N TR 5132 LOT 66 ATACHD 7,455 50,`/39 77,191-75
HTS SMITH MARION HANNAH TR *16882 BOLERO LN H-TR 1 7 8—3 1 3—0 7 RES 2369-2 16982 BOLERO LN HTS
*1TINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1%5 8-4-2.5 . 4/10/80 24 808
155344--ai LM
l N TR 5132 LOT 65 (714) 846-9527 ATACHD 6,000 135700087-H 51,910 76,318-75 '
OHT9F � FRANC R *TOPPO SHAREN I HW 1 7 8—3 1 3—0 8 RES 11667-1 16872 BOLERO LN HTB
+Tc BOLERO LN *HUNTIAGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1965. &-3-2.0 3/22/88 142 059
,532_84 N TR 5132 LOT 64 ATACHD 6,000 88-128861-6 -_ 78,J66 220,425-81
HT8 MEYER AMC *16862 BOLERO LN H-BL 1 7 8—3 1 3—0 9 RES 1927-1 16862 BOLERO LN HT8
000-FI *HLNTINGTN BCH,CA. 92649 1965 6-3-2.0 24 809 i
,500-891 N TR 5132 LOT 63 ATACHD 6,000 42,00 67,629-751
HTB MOURITZ PETER F *3942 FINISTERRE DR H-CP 1 7 8—3 1 4—0 1 RES 2369-2 3942 FINISTERRE DR HTB
,531-81 �
N*FTR 5132 LOTH�lOA 92649. (714)
264. (714) 846-6928 ATACHD 196P4 6 600 . 1098310563 58695 6 .. . 85,,6033--75F
WARDEN HILDA L *3932 FINISTERRE DR H-WD 1 7 8—3 1 4—0 2 RES 1959-1 3932 FINISTERRE DR HTB.
r000 *4A�fTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1964 7 3-2.0. 2/01/89 24 809 .
'i,512-77� N TR 5132 LOT 71 ATACHD 6, 89-073181-U 42,UO� 67,629-75
WILSON GRANT H *3922 FINISTERRE DR„ H-JT 1 7 8—3 1 4—0 3 . RE8_ 937-1 3922 FINISTERRE DR ' HTB
OAF *44lNTIl16T11 BCH to 92649 19W -3-2.0 8104171 24 809 51�500-F
000
.
. 4(1-84� N TR 5132 LOT �2 ATAC}p .' 6, 097470110 .', 43,;49 ",ISM
, SM75
HTB I HURWITZ FRANCES H *3912 FINISTERRE DR H-WD. .1 7 8—3 1 4-0 4 RES` 19927-1 3912 . FINISTERRE DR HTB
*HWINGTON BEACH �.0 9/10/85 43 691
305-81 { N TR 5132 LOT 73' (714) 846-4332 ATACHD 6, 85-340350-U 45,968 89,359-76�
HTB ROSEN FRANCLYN *ROSEN CHERYL 1 7 8-3 1 4—0 S REgg 22369-2 3892 FINISSTERRE DR HTB
*3892 FINESTERRE AVE *HUYTIAGTON BEACH CA 92649 1964 8- -2.5 11/18/86 193 099 3pp 0004
`, �qFj N TR 5132 LOT 74 ' ATACHD 6,000 86-564740-G 139,621 332, 20-871
CW,Ao.t,.* hC
-9663 - REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
-2345 * - - -2345
ARANr: E rAuaTY . DARrcl I T Q T
�27-9663 REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
- ���Y�
35=2345� ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST -r a-ass=i3es
c
1989-90 EDITION 10
CITY i OWNER ADDRESS / CARE OF EX-VST , TYPE SQ.FT.-F UNITS SITUS ADDRESS CITY
2 VAL
ZIP YEAR ROOM CT. DATE LAND VAL TFR VAL
z VAL-YRj HC/STS PHONE. . PARKING A P LOTSIZE DOCUMENT-X IMP VAL FULL VAL-YRi
HTB ( BAKER ROBERT C TR *3911 LEGEND CIR TE 1 7 8—31 4-3 4 RES 2369-2 3911 LEGEND Cl HTB
,.8 500-F i *IUYTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1964 8-4-2.5 5/13/88 27 080
3,M-75 ; N TR 5132 LOT 103 (714) 846-9538 ATACHD 7,626 88-224663-6 50,939 77,719-75 !
—HTB S BULLOCK 8QB *9lLLOCK PAULETTE 178—314—35 RES 2276-3 3921 LEGEND Cl HTB {
*3921 LEGEND CIR *HUNTIMfON BEACH,CA 92649 1964 8-3-3.0 10/23/95 167 363 49 500-L
2,016-75 ; N TR 5132 LOT 104 *87 ATACHD P 6,790 85-408425-6 108,949 275,M-86j
HM ) CUMQNGS EDWARD H *3%1 LEGEND CIR H-JT 1 7 8-3 1 4—3 6 RES 2361-1 3941 LEGEND Cl HHTB
�2 OOo-F -MUNTINGTN SCH CA 92649 1964 8-4-3.0 8115172 27 080 54 5O0-F
;,498-75 V TR 5132 LOT 105 (714) SW7825 ATACHD P 7,776 102730991 76,676 103,096r75
HTB ST PIERRE RONi1LD *VMJGHN TR H-TR 1 7 8—3 1 5—0 1 RES 3115-2 16892 BARLMA LN HTB
! *16892 BARLIM LN *HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1964 9-4-4.0 2/18/81 91 585
I,1,892-75 ! TR 5264 LOT 2 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN ATACHD 6,000 139521750-H 91,ul 183,006-76
FERGUSON CRAZG C =1691)2 eAAIMA LN HT9 1 7 8—3 1 5—0 2 RES 3101-2 16902 BARUNA LN HTH
i *HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 19" 9-4-2.5 2/11/85 259 284 400 000-Fi
3 143-78 TR 5264 LOT 3 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN ATACHD 5,000 85-048149-6 162, 1 422,145-85 '
FERGUSON OLIVER J *1&M2 BARIMA LX H-HW 1 7 8-3 1 5-0 3 RES 2467-2 16912 BARUNA LN HTB
HTB t *HHUNTINGTN BCH CA 92649 1964 8-4-3.0 . 9/21/77 277 904 297 500-Fj
;,505-80 TR 5264 LOT 4 fill. (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIMS IN (714) 846-47M ATACHD 51800 123850353 115,W 393,S46-78
HTB i COONEY GEORGE T *16922 BAMMA LN H-WR 1 7 8—3 1 5—0 4 RES 3132-2 16922 BARUNA LN HTB
000-F( *HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 196S 7-4-3.0 6/04/82 110 078 225 000 1
TR 5264 LOT 5 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN (T14) 846r9468 ATACHD 5,700 82-191237-U 124,491 235,669-78#
GIBSON JAWS K *GIBSON MARGARET S H-CP 1 7 8-3 1 5-0 5 RES 2o71-1 16932 BAMM LNHTe �
5 OAF; *16932 BARUNA LANE *IUNTIaTON BEACH CA 92649 1964 6r-3-2.0 10/21/92 60 054
166-87; TR 5264 LDT 6 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN ATACHD 5,000 82-370622-G 52,69 112,142-751
HTB FRICK ROBERT J *16942 BARUNA LN Hw 1 7 8—3 1 5-0 6 RES 1794-1 16942 BARUNA LN Kra
*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1%4 7-3-3.0 6/30/89 349 835 695 00D'-F;
447-75 TR 5264 LOT 7 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN ATACHD 5,000 89-348055-G 100,138 449,673-87 :
HOUSEAL HOBENT W JR *16952 BARUNA LN H-JT 1 7 8—3 1 5-0 7 RES 2363-1 6952 9ARUNA LN HTB
i3 S00-F *HUNTINGTN BCH CA 92649 1964 7-3-2.0 10/10/75 91 585
',654_80 TR 5264 LOT 8 t1L.L (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN (714) 846-9556 ATACHD 5,000 115361494 64,641 155,626-76 '
HTB HERRICK LYLE D *12027 S EAST END AVE H-UM 1 7 8-3.1 5-0 8 RES 5-1 16962 BAMMA LN HTB
*CHINO CA 91710. 1964 2.5 3/26/80 411 859455 500-H_o
."6D89F 1 TR 52U LOrT 9 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN ATACHD 5,000 135491059-G 103,91 515,96 41
HTB
PERRY JOHN M *16972 BA14MA LN H-JT 1 7 8—315—0 9 Res 2m-2 16m Mmm LAM Hie
*HUNTINGTNI CA 92649 1%4 §4 3.0 4/O6/�2� 60 055 90
,77S-75 I TR 5264 LOST 1ff ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGTS (714) 592-1533 ATACHD 5,000 IOD690990 60,606 120,06�F
HT8 U S SIDECARS TRAIL * 1 7 8-3 1 5-1 0. RES 641-2 16982 BARUNA LN HTB
s 500-L i NEW AAEIt * SEE SITUS t%4 2.5 9106189 435 0
93-79 TR 5264 LOT 11 ALL (HNC ADJACJ3HT WHARFAGE RIGRS ATACHD 5, . 89-475631-Q 143,14P 578,71"7
HTe YouNIS ERNEST *1699Q BARLMA LN 1 7 8-31 5-1 1 t77-1 6992 BAMMA LN HRH ?
000-F' TR 52INGTM 64 LOT812�AALLL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ��9(714) 592-5311 ATACHD S 0020.0 899-455764-Q 652160 179 058-77-;521-75 : • • • a
�27-9663 � - REAL ESTATE�IF01MATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-%63
:35=i345¢ 4* i=7 385=2345*
ORANGE COUNTY PJ1aCE1 i itT
,OAT/7 .. . t-' --- -�-•--- '�-'^---•...�.. ..�..... .�, v.v•...+++--'n.,q.ro► ... -7,vw I Ijaw- IIr,Ems
:�27-9003 MEW
- REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
=ss=234st. E ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST 1-11 a=385=2345ii
I ; 1989-90 EDITION M 1 0
OMER ADDRESS / CARE OF EX-VST . TYPE SQ.FT.-F UNITS SITUS ADDRESS CITY '
VACITY ZIP YEAR ROOM CT. DATE LAND VAL TFR VAL
VAL-YRi HC/STS PHONE PARKING A P LOTSIZE DOCUMENT-X IW VAL FULL VAL-YR �
! GERMAN RICHARD H *16951 BOLERO LN m 1 7 8—3 1 5—4 0 RES 3236-2 16951 BOLERO LN HTB
rJ�O FFf 1 TRR552rINGTON BEACH CA64 LOT 411 U -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ��9 ATACHD 19P5 15�00040.0 87-197664-G 1 4/10/87 73,586 7 2,�aa 714 000s7 !
1 KAKINDTO WILLIAM M TR *16941 BOLERO LN 1 7 8—3 1 5—4 1 RES 2257-1 16941 BOLERO LN HTB
,,� M *HUNTINGTON BEACH ,CA 92649 1965 8-4-2.0. 12/15!88 603 617 715 OOQ-F �
TR 5264 LOT 42 ALL -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,000 88-650651-G 111,183 715,600-89
HOFLY C ROBERT *16931 BOLERO LN H-CP 1 7 8—3 1 5—4 2 RES 4016-3 16931 BOLERO LN HTB
t4UNT�� i 1R 5204 LOT 43 it -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS TON BEACH CA 92649 1965
846-7053 ATACHD 1%5 15 000 �12551538 840,6935 145,6�751
.,450-75 1
MITCHELI WARREN I *MITCHELL NANCIE L 1 7 8-3 1 5—4 3 RES 1747-1 16921 BOLERO LN HTB 1
HTB I *16921 6OLER0 LN *HUNTINGT6N BEACH CA 92649 1965 6-3-2.0 6/28/85 451 013 425 000-FI
),229-751 TR 5264 LOT 44 ALL -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE AIGHTS ATACHD 5,000 85-237891-G 208, 659,461-861
i ALLEN R VIRGIL *16911 BOLERO LN H-8L 1 7 8—3 1 5—4 4 RES 2933-2 16911 BOLERO LN HTB
HTB *►UNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1965 8-3-2.0 60 055
,b
�'S
9087-87 T.. 5264 LOT 45 ALL -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (714) 946-9567 DTACHD 5,000 94,�48 154,.703-75
MUHS FRED B TR *6921 LOYOLA DR TR 1 7 8—3 1 5—4 5 RES 794-1 16901 BOLERO LN HTB
00�0-F ; *HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 1965 3-3-3.0 8/01/Sr 91 584
j,�02_87� TR 5264 LOT 46 ALL -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (714) 842-5363 ATACHD 5,000 13687(" 4 55,�31 146,715-76
HTS ! WOWIN6 LIONG TR *16891 BOLERO LN 1 7 8—3 1 5—4 6 RES 2988-2 16891 BOLERO LN HTe
*HI�RINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1965 9-4-3.0 10/29/86 521 737
;',S�F; TR 5261 LOT 47 ALL -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (714) 840-7004 BUILTN 6,000 86-514626-Q 136,155 657,892-80
HM FREDERIKSEN WILFRED C *16881 BOLERO LN H-WR 1 7 8—3 1 5—4 7 RES 3951-3 16981 BOLERO LN HTS
;1,500-F *HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9'"9 1965 10-5-3.5 9/03/81 92 986
�_6br77$ TR 5264 LOT 48 ALL -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (710) 846-1524 ATACHD 5,300 142070533-U 90,178 183,364-76 _
HTB FORE JOI ;: L *16871 BOLERO LN H-WD 1 7 8—3 1 5—4 8 RES 3888-2 16871 BOLERO LN HTB ,
9 OOQ-F ' *HANNTINGiON BEACH CA 92649 1%7 8-4-4.0 4/27/81 62 468
376r75i TR 5264 LOT 49 ALL -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,400 140341140-U 81,582 144,250-751 _
KUM EUZABETH ANN *16861 BOLERO LN H-ND 1 7 8—3 1 5—4 9 RES 2271J-1 16861 BOLERO LN KTB
1t O F4 *HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1966 6-3-3.0 2/C11/82 63 675
89-85 TR 5264 LOT 50 ALL -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,600 82-037016-IU 261,01 325,566-75
GREEN SARBARA AM *16851 BOLERO LN 1 7 8—31 5—5 0 RES 3284 2 16951 BOLERO Lti HTB f
NTH ; *HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1966 9-5-4.0 6/03/37 - 63 145 i
,,919-75 { TR 5264 LOT 51 ALL -INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (714) 846rt327 ATACHD 5,500 87-313410-6 82,�50 145,795-75s.
HUNTINGTON IW®OUR CORP *4241 WARNER AVE X-XF 1 7 8—3 1 5—5 1 WHX 121-1 SI7M PENDING
.) OOQ-Fi *HLWINGTN BCH CA 92647 2/29/74 137
TR 5264 LOT C ILL -9( WHARFAGE RIGHTS- 10OX I14T - 0645000 137-751
HTS i HUNTINGTON HARBOUR CORP *4241 WARNER AVE X-XF 1 7 8—3 1 5—5 Z WHX 198-1 SITUS PENDING '
3,100-F T*�64 LC BCBH CA l00x. INT - CITY Of HUNTINGTON BEACH
0645o _4 137 1�7
�00
� 1 16901 WESTPORT OR *KJNTNTWHI BEACH,CA 92649 1 7 8-3 21 -0 1 1964 8-3613.0 9/17/816901 281 704T DR 385 000-F j
:L33-76 N TR 4880 LOT 1S1 ATACHD P 8,453 87-525591-G 110,496 392,f00-88i
JUM •�•
.,2;_9683 Fir - REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
-�Ems
- REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527--9663
;_-9�5� i* —i-714-385-2345
23 , ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST ;
1989-90 EDITION D 11 1
CITY OWNER ADDRESS / CARE OF EX-VST . TYPE SQ.FT.-F UNITS SITUS ADDRESS CITY ':
2IP YEAR ROON CT. DATE LAND VAL TFR VAL
Y,L-YR ': HC/STS PHONE PARKING A P LOTSIZE DOCUMENT-X I!P VAL FULL VAL-YR
BUCCOLA VICTOR JHTRA *16979 EDGEWATER LN H-TR9 1 7 8-3 2 3—1 6 RES
964 22996+_t-2 1 /1 /816979 EDGEWATER LN HTB
300-F : *H UINTIN6 EAC C 3.0 U 3 61 604
01_88 ; TR 488D LOT 15 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS 5,000 83-452050-H 71,M 133,395-75
g410RANA RUSSELL J TR *16985 EDGEWATER LN 1 7 8-3 2 3-1 7 RES 1819-3 16985 EDGEWATER LN HTB I
*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1964 7-3-2.0 4/07/86 328 704
_37-88
TR 4880 LOT 16 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,000 86-137647-6 151,675 480,579-80
THOWSOM*16989 EEDGGEWATER LN *HUNTINGT6N BEACH VIRGINIATHOWSON L 92649 1 7 8-3 2 3-1 8 RES 1964 73-3.0 11/08/84�� 382 86SFR tJr HTB II!
�55_88 � TR 488D LOT 17 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 6000 84-460815-H 456,613 838,878-89 '
IS THOIPSON VIRGINIA *ThOHPSON VIRGINIA L H-TR 1 7 8-3 2 3-1 8 RES 1794-1 16989 EDGEWATER LN HTS
I *16989 EDGEWATER LN *HUNTINGT5N BEACH 92649 1964 7-3-2!.0 11/08/84 382 865 t
?17-881 TR 488D LOT 17 ALL (INC 83
ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS H/C. ATACHD 6,100 84-46081" 456,613 8,878-89f
CARLSON JOHN A *16995 EDGEWATER LN 1 7 8-3 2 3-1 9 RES 2231-1 16995 EDGEWATER LN HTB
*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1964 7-3-3.0 12/19/86 381 879 486 000-F
354-87 TR 4880 LOT 18 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,000 86-628091-6 113,151 495,5D-87
f HMO" PATER *HORTON DONNA S HM 1 7 8-3 2 3-2 0 RES 794-1 17003 ' EDGEWATER LN HTS
*17003 EDGEWATER LN *MHNTIATON BEACH CA 92649 1964 7-3-3.0 7/06/87 57 457 480 000-F
TR 488D LOT 19 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE kIGHTS ATACHD 5,000 87-384015-6 67,f04 124,f61-75
THO14PSON JANES R *17007 EDGEWATER LN H-JT 1 7 8-3 2 3-2 1 RES 3466-2 17007 EDGEWATER LN HT8
*HUNTINGTN 8CH,CA 92649 1964 10-5-3.5 7/24/72 61 604 109 0008E
TR 4880 LOT 20 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (714) 846-0543 ATACHD 5,000 102360857 68,087 130,01-75
GOULDING STANFORD *P 0 BOX 240 1 7$-3 2 3 2 2 RES 747-1 17009 EDGEWATER LN . HTB
*SUNSET BEACH CA 90742 1964 1-3-2.0 4/25/89 252 993
-130-88 , TR 4880 LOT 21 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,000 89-216450-G 69,656 322,849-78
HUNTINGTON HARBOUR CORP .*4241 WARNER AVE X-XF 1 7 8-3 2 3-2 3 WHX VAC-LAND SITUS PENDING
*HUNTIK-M BCH CA 92647 2/29/74 137 I
45_� TR 48M LOT D WOR LOT -LYING ADJACENT TO LOTS 8 TO 24,194 06450M 137-751
HUNTINGTON HARBOUR COW *4241 WARNER AVE X-XF 1 7 8-3 2 3-2 4 WHX . '36-1 SITUS PENDING
*HAJHr<TIN6TN BCH CA 92647 2/29/74 .137
742-88! TR 48M LOT A i= INT - CITY CF HUNTINGTON BEACH 1.4 0645000 137-75
HTEI t S*HA NKO JOHNN BEACH,CA *16771 BOLERO LN 92649 1 7 8—3 2 3—2 7- 1%5 3/06/844052 D0ENPORT LN . HTB
'35-791 N TR 48tO LOT 173 (714) 340-1433 32,448 84-094160-H . 18,637 518,304-831
HTB
i STANKO JOHN J TR *16771 BOLERO LN TR 1 7 8-3 2 3—2 8 CON . . SITUL PENDING,
4 *HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649' 1970. 3/06/84 2 838 1 .:
116-771 N TR 4880 LOT C (714) 840-1433 2.1 84-094160-H . 186, 189,439-83
HT8 COLAO GIOVANNI 8 *16931 SAYBROOC LN wn 1 7 8-3 3 1 —0 1 - RES 2564-2 16931 SAYBROOK LN HTB
1 N*�T4761NLOTH�CA - 92649 1965 8-4-2.5 6/14/j6_ 56 534 113 000
73-75 ' S ATACHD 7,600 117701i3R+ 58,6% 115,433-77
HTB FILIPAN JAWS S *FILIPAN VIRGINIA HW 1 7 8-3 3 1 -0 2 RES 2366-2 16941 SAYElr LN HTB ;
*16531 COTUIT *HUNTIHl6fON BEACH,CA 92649 1965 8-44 2.5 1pp/14/88 3 5 859 431 0008E
''87 , .y TR 4761 LOT 24 ATACHD P 6,500 88-527293-G 1t�,�41 431,600-89}
9663 _L�n - REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
-2345 n!) A kl& r r n H R u" n Ad%jb r• • T A T =71�=;385=2345
r map - REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
-2345* ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST 7i a-3as—�3a5
1989-90 EDITION L 12
CITY PIPER ADDRESS /CARE OF EX-VST . TYPE SQ.FT.-F UNITS SITUS ADDRESS CITY
ZIP YEAR ROOM CT. DATE LAND VAL TFR VAL
u- HC/STS PHONE PARKING A P LOTSIZE DOCUENT-X IMP VAL FULL VAL-YR
i.
,AL-TRH I JACOBS BARBARA E * MUCH BARBARA E ND . 1 7 8—3 6 3-4 1 RES 2018-1 4081 DIABLO Cl HTB
HTB j *3558 WINDSPUr OR *HINTINGfON BEACH CA 92649 1966 8-4-2.5 6/26/78 48 083
4_75 TR 5360 LOT 22 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,024 127320586-A 50,1155 98,238-75
` ROSS HARRY F *4071 DIABLO CIR H-BL 1 7 8—3 6 3—4 2 RES 2105-1 4071 DIABLO CI HTB
',5HTB *KINTINGTN BCH CA 92649 1967. 7-3-2.0 58 605
531-83f TR 5360 LOT 21�ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,000 60,96 118,611-75I
HTB ? ROSSI ROSEMARY
1 7 8—3 6 3—4 3 RES 3618-2 4061 DIABLO CI NT13
* NEW OW ER * SEE SITUS 1970 10-4-3.5 6/19/89 60 055
993_75 � TR 5360 LOT 20 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,000 89-320830-G 96,623 156,078-75
IS UZEL LEND *4061 DIABLO CIR H-TR 1 7 8—3 6 3—4 3 RES 3618-2 4061 DIABLO Cl HTB
HTa i *HUNTINGTC`4 BEACH CA 92649 1970 10-4-3.5 12/21/es8 60 055
)32_86 � TR 5360 LOT 20 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS H/C ATACHD 5,000 88-665771-H 96,623 156,078-75
HAMILTON J.:CK G TR *4041 DIABLO CIR 1 7 8—3 6 3—4 4 RES 3780-2 4041 DIABLO Cl HTB
' 50HTS *HLWINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1968 7-3-3.0 10/06/86 60 054
3210-F TR 5360 LOT lei ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIG#iTS (714) 592-1010 ATACHD 5,049 86-468597-. 86,V67 146,521-75
ff DAVE GRATTAN 9 SONS INC *16147 MONTOYA 1 7 8—3 6 3—4 5 RES 767-1 4031 DIABLO CI HTB
Hm *P 0 BOX 2264 *IRWINDALE CA 91706 1967 6-2-2.0 10/25/85 360 894 440 000-r
O
524- r TR 5360 LOT 18 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,124 85-411437-G 106,635 466,09-86
. 86
H i MCWHINNEY MIX C *4021 DIABLO CIR ND j 7 8—3 6 3—4 6 RES 3960-2 4021 DIABLO Cl HTS
i F * TINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1%8 10-4-4.5 6/10/80 131 128 30 000-L
,37 CI TR 5360 LOT 17 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,775 136301545-U 227, 54� 358,182-78
H� WOOLSEY WILLIAM F *4001 DIABLO CIR JT 7 8—3 6 3—4.7 RES 3770-2 4001 DIABLO Cl HTB
*F#JJITJNGTN BCH,cA 92649 1973 6/26/73 69 132 58 500-F
544 751 TR 5360 LOT 16 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS P 5,160 107680635 108,146 177,178-75 ;
PA M JOHN THOMAS TR *4002 DIABLO CIR *-TR 1 7 8—3 6 3—4$ RES 4368-2 4002 DIABLO CI HTe II
-OO F' *HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92669 1973 12-5-5.0 8/02/83 70 729 j
lly)-89� TR 5360 LOT 15 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,590 83-332982-H 147,�02 217,931-75 !
HTB { STANSFIELD JEFFREY J *STANSSFIELD, LAURETTA J H-JT 17 8—3 6 3—4 9 RES 2452-2 4022 DIABLO Cl HTB
1 I *4022 DIABLO CIR *HUNTINGTON BEACH 92649 1985 7-3-3.0 5/02/84 529 547 377 000-L
,519-75 ! TR 5360 LOT 14 ALL (INC, ADJACENT WHARFAGE 6IGHTS DTACHD P - 5,720 84-180621-G 542,S28 . 1,071,675-87
HM JONES CAROLYN KOCH *4032 DIABLO CIR H-0 1 7 8—3 6 3—5 0 RES. 2989-2 4032 DIABLO Cl HTB
*HWINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1965 8-4-2.5 9/25/86 64 593
:21_7S TR 5360 LOT 13 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (714) 846-9511 ATACHD 5,289 86-445910-U 91,M 156,465-75
HTB DICKSON TED E *DICKSON VICKIE H-JT 1 7 8—3 6 3-5 1 RES 2460-2 4052 DIABLO Cl HTB
*4052 DIABLO CIR *MJNTIMGfON BEACH,CA 92649 1965 8- -3.0. 7/22/37 357 408
.549-781 N TR 5360 LOT 12 ATACHD P 5,349 • . 87-416885-t" 141,482 499,390-87t
HTe 1 REEDER WILLIAM H H *REEDER RUTH H CP 1 7 8—3 6 3—5 2 RES VAC-LAND 4062 DIABLO Cl HT8
i *1444 OAKLAWN RD *ARCADIA CA 91006 111IM83 60,054
•;2¢83i TR 5360 LOT 11 ALL (INC ADJACENT GHARFAGE RIGHTS (818) 355-6513 5,000 83-538510-11 60,054-75
I ROBERTS R LEE *ROBERTS ANTOINETTE R HW 1 7 8—3 6 3—5 3 RES 2082-1 4072 DIABLO CI we i
*4072 DIABLO CIR *HJNTIOON BEACH C 92649 1966 6-3-2.0 5/13/88 424 114 515 000-F{
;21_75 ' TR 5360 LOT 10 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD P 5,000 88-224561-6 101,186 525,W89
9663 SIFF - REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
'5-2345 * - 4=3835--2345i
nRANGE. COUNTY PARCEL LIST. .
— p *407Z DIABLO—CIR _ *HUN1iN6Ttiw1 UMN C YZo4V . . . lloo 6-3—Z.0 5113/88 %2% 114 515 000—F
500-5 i TR 5360 LOT 10 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE kIGHTS ATACHD P 5,000 88-224561—G 101,186 525,100-89
REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
35=2345,� �* - 4-385=2345
ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST ;
j1989-90 EDITION N 1 2
t
CITY 014�ER ADDRESS / CARE OF EX—VST , TYPE SQ.FT.—F UNITS SITUS ADDRESS CITY
VAC ZIP YEAR ROOM CT. DATE LAM VAL TFR VAL
_ VAL—YR ! HC/STS PHONE PARKING A P LOTSIZE DOCUMENT—X IMP VAL FULL VAL-YRj
HTB GORDON BENJAMIN *4082 DIABLO CIR H—BL 1 7 8-3 6 3—5 4 RES 2918-2 4082 DIAMO Cl HTS 1
*HHNTINGTN BCH CA 92649 1965 6-4-3.0 40 501
�,257-75 ' TR 5360 LOT 9 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN (714: 946-3597 ATACHD 5,138 68,410 108,911-75
I ,IANESKI GERARD J *JANESKI SUZANNE V H-CP 1 7 8-3 6 3—5 5 RES 2654-2 4092 DIABLO CI HRH
HTH *4092 DIABLO CIR *HUNTINSfCN BEACH,CA 92649 1967 9-4-3.5 6/10/82 1Ti 378 ±
000—FI N TR 5360 LOT 8 ATACHD P 8,030 82-19811" $1,A34 259,212-791
'166 75 ZWICK EUGENE 8 *P 0 BOX 2460 H"£L 1 7 8-3 6 3—5 6 RES 2624-2 16841 EDGEWATER LN HTB I
HTB *MWINFTON BEACH CA 92646 1968 7-3-3.0 52 571 I
>,000-89 s TR 5360 LOT 7 ALL(INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN ATACHD 5.100 307,189 359,960-75 �
BANZETT HOWARD *16851 EDGEWATER AVE H—m 1 7 8-3 6 3—5 7 RES 3055-2 16851 EDGEWATER LN HTB I
HTB *HRHTINGTN BCH CA 92649 1968 9-4-3.0 57 111
`J OGD—F TR 53M LOT 6 AE (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN (714) 846-9105 ATACHD 5,000 81,491 138,602-75
3 58-87 j
' SCHWANTES E DOUGLAS JR *16861 EDGEWATER LN up, 178-363-58 RES 4627-2 16861 EDGEWATER LN HTB
HTB i *HDIGTINGTON BEACH,CA 92647 1969 9-4-4.0 1/05/89 601 509 825 00D—F
363-75 i
' I N TR 5360 LOT 5 5,250 89-00698D-6 223,491 825,600-89
Hre E COLEWA WILLIAM R *COLENHAN KIMERLY S HW 1 7 8-3 6 3—5 9 RES 2599-2 40r. DAVS ORT DR HTB I
*4081 DAVENPORT 9T *HUNTING BEACH C 92647 1%8 8-4-3.0 5/26/88 267 016 400 OOD—F
''5 OHF R,T24-87 ( �. 5360 LOT 4 ALL —0 POR DESC IN Or —7576f709 OR— ATACHD P 7,452 88-246443-6 140,484 408,600-89
;- s BESLEY PO4AS F TR *4061 DAVENPORT DR 1 7 8-3 6 3—6 0 RES 2998-2 4061. DAVENPORT DR HM
J *H NTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1965 9-4-2.5 1/09/87 90 714
0H-.B
000—Fl T- 5360 LOT 3 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN ATACHD P 51050 87-011373-6 97,451 188,665-76-80
PGCHOLSON EDWARD LALONDE *4051 DAVBSNXW DR H• A 1 7 8-3 6 3—6 1 RES 2477-2 4051 — DAVENPORT DR HTB
kTB *M.WINGTON BEACH,CA 9L j=9 1966 8-4-3.5 11/14/83 58 605
-,_99-77F TR 3-3-60 LOT 2 ALL (UIC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN ATACHD 51000 83-553681—H 72,461 131,566-75 '
HTB CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH *P 0 BOX 190 x-xx 1 7 8-3 6 3-6 2 uHx vAC-LAND 4001 DAVENPORT DR HTB
S,OOG—F *HHUNTINGTN BCH CA 92649 7/30/70 254,728
.,689-871 N TR 5360 LOT f 20,000 09—MOO178 254,728-75 �
i H NTINGTON HARBOIM CORD *4241 WARIER AVE X—XF 1 7 8-3 6 3-6 3 wHx VAC—LAND SITUS PENDING E
0OD{ I *NUNTINGTN BCH CA 92647 2/29/74 137
'i500—Hl9, TR 5360 LOT A W* OF LOT 100% INT - CITY OF 3.6 0645000 137-751
HANRINGTON HARBOUR CORP *4241 WARNER AVE X—XF 1 7 8-3 6 3—6 4 WHX VAC—LAND- SITUS PENDING .
5 OOD—F 4 *FHUNTUHGTN BCH CA 92647 2/29/74 137
,�500-891 TR 5360 LOT 8 ALL —LYING ADJACENT TO LOTS 2, 3, 5, 2.1 0645000 137-75
HTB } SAPMEN ADMEN N *16737 BOLERO Lu H-BL 1 7 8—3 7.1 —01 RES 3899-2 16757 BOLERO LN HTB
I OOD—F( *HAYTINGTN BCH,CA 92649 1965 9-5-3.5 60 055 .
§62-85} TR 5050 LOT 48 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS 51090 85,107 145,362-75
HTB SIMMONS LOUISE J *16761 BOLERO LN 1 7 8—3 71 —0 2 RES V 07-2 16761 BOLERO LN HT8
--WNTINGTN SCH,C.; 92649 1966 4-3.5 6/05/89 60 055
318-78 I TR 5050 LOT 49 ALL (LUC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD 5,000 89-296049—Q 105,293 165,348-75
HTB MINASIAN JOHN K *16767 B('LERO LN HH—JT 1 7 8—3 71 —0 3 RES ��ygg,33 2 16M7 BOLERO LN HTB �
--H NTINGTN BCH,CA 92649 1965 8-4-3.0 11/25/70 60 055 55 50D-F ,
,559-75 TR 5050 LOT 50 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (714) 592-3124 ATACHD 5,000 094700530 75,214 135,269-75
•aA •ti CO..Aq..T YANK
- REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
27-9663 /Rffw i=714=T85=2345
;�s=23as ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST
� j
1989-90 EDITION C 13
A
CITY ; ONNER ADDRESS / CARE Of EX-VST . TYPE So.FT.-f UNITS SITUS ADDRESS CITY '
ZIP YEAR R0011 CT. DATE LAND VAL TFR VAL 1
VAL ` HC/STS PHONE PARKING A P LOTSIZE DOCUMENT-X IMP VAL FULL VAL-YRI
VAL
CHANG TERRY J L- *CHANG TERRY J L TR 1 7 8—3 7 3-O 4 RES 3423-2 16752 SEA WITCH LN HTB
HTB *16752 SEA WITCH LN *HUNTIAGTON BEACH 92649 1972 11-5-3.0 3/01/89 229 643
S6F N TR 5050 LOT 95 ATACHD 6,000 89-10768Z-6 178,157 408,000-88 �
1-75 FAIRON DEBORAH J *167420 SEA WITCH LN 1 7 8—3 7 3-O S RES 2080-2 16742 SEA WITCH LN HTB
HTB I *HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1969 8-4-3.0 2/24/89 239 790 !
N TR 5050 LOT 96 ATACHD P 6,000 89-098114-0 112,B4 352,024-89
,760-75I MARTIN MICHAEL *MARTIN CHRISTINE H-JT 1 7 8—3 7 3-O 6 RES 2633-2 16732 SEAWITCH LN HTB
HTS *16732 SEAWITCH LN *HUNTIN.TON BEACH,CA 92649 1973 9-4-3.0 12/14/83 200 179 335 000-F
000-L N TR 5050 LOT 97 ATACHD 5,250 83-566679-6 169,467 369,S86-841
7,622-86 j
j MQRALES RAFAEL E *16721 BARUNA LN H-BL 1 7 8-3 7 3-0 7 RES 2151-1 16721 BARUNA LN HTS
?t 0HTS
*I�RINGTN BCH CA 92649 1971 8-3-2.0 27 080
',�16-88' N TR 5050 LOT �8 (714) 846-3094 DTACHD 6,600 51,103 78,783-75 �
LASKER H PETER *16741 BARUNA LN H-JT 1 7 8—3 7 3—O 8 RES 1866r1 16741 BARUNA LN HTB
*HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1969 7-3-2.0 5/02/74 25 196 71 500-F
564-76� TR 5050 LOT 99 Pa OF LOT AND POR OF LOT 100 (P M (714) 946-OM ATACHD 6,000 111340312 71,353 96,149-75
ii GARGAN LEO E *GARGAN NORMA P HW 1 7 8—3 7 3-O 9 RES 2088-2 16751 BARUNA LN HTS
HTB I *16751 BARUNA LN *HUNTINgTON BEACH CA 92649 1969 8-4-3.0 1/15/88 256 785 360 000-F
,076-86! TR 5050 LOT 99 POR OF LOT AND POR OF LOT 166 (P N ATACHD P .6,300 88-020672-6 110,415 367,200-88
' ERICKSON DALE P TR *16761 BARUNA LN 1 /8—3 7 3-1 O RES 2654-2 16761 BARUNA LN HTB
*► WINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1967 9-4-3.5 5/31/88 27 080
000-Ff N TR 5050 LOT 101� (714) 846r2296 ATACHD 7,125 88-254552-a 59,W 86,462-75
,t�71-80
SEGAL GARY PETER SEr3AL, PHYLLIS P 1 7 8—3 7 3-1 1 RES 2433-2 16771 KAMALII DR HTB
II''S 0HT9 *16771 KAMALII :HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1969 9-4-2.5 9/26/85 170 377 280 000-Ff
,500-89i N TR 5050 LOT 102 ATACHD 7,370 85-318842-G 126,160 297,137-86
HTS DOREMUS CHERIE *KERR CHERIE ND 1 7 8-3 7 3-1 2 RES 2427-2 16781 KAMALII DR HTB ,
•5 000-LI *16781 KAMALII DR *HUNTfNGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1969 9-4-3.0 5/15/84 53 535
,�01-80f N TR 5050 LOT 103 (714) 846-3830 ATACHD P 6,000 84-200740-0 71,435 125,470-77
NTH I HILL SUZANNE F *16791 KAMALII OR UW 1 7 8—3 7 3-1 3 RES 2838-2 16791 KAMALII OR HTB
000-F� *HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1969 8-3-3.0 5/04/87 213 543 335 000
.� 000 N TR 5050 LOT 104 ATACHD 6,000 87-245515-6 134 348,S34-87 .
SCHELL.HAPIER MMST *SCHEUHAMMER DOROTHY W 17 8—3 7 3—14 RES 3010-2 168M KAMALII DR HTS
HM *16801 KAMALII DR *HUNTINGTON BbA 92649 1974 9-4-3.0 6/04/86 185 711 352 500-F
"A - N TR 5050 LOT 105 ATACHD '6,000- 86-232428-6 188,164 374,675-86
HTS HAVE NOW *PERRYMAN LYNN 1 7 8—3 7 3—1 S . RES 2088-2 16MI KAMALII DR HTB
*16811 KANIALII DR *HUNTING%i SEACH,CA 92649 1969 8-4-3.0 ` 8/22/86 180 790 . 278 500-F
,283-80 N TR 505E LOT 106 ATACHD ;: +. -- 6,500 . 86-3774E6-G 108,460 289,f'S0-87
HANSER DAVID V *16782 SEAWITCH LN H-JT 1 7 8-3 7 3-1 6 RES 3752-2 16782 SEA WITCH LN HTB
000-F *HUNTIN6TN BCN,CA 92649 1967 &g-� 3.0 12/07/77 265 253 350 000-FI
HM,,500-89i TR 5050 LOT 92 AND LOT 93 (714) 592-5151 ATACHD P 12,500 124830431 165,159 430,912-781
HELLER ALAN W *NELLER SHIRLEY D CP 1 7 8—3 7 4—0 1 R 328D-' 16852 SEA WITCH LN HTBHT8 j
S F *16852 SEAWITCH LN *HUNTIN6TON BEACH CA 92649 .1 8- 2.5 10/28/81 2211 946 248 000-L ?
,35OD-F TR 5050 LOT 110 AND POR OF LOT 109 ATACHD P 6,5888 142711130-6 157,�94 369,g4D-82;
•aA '. • CpMgwt taw�%C'
C
s ems•
?7-9663 w/ - REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
s=23as* * n R A N A E COUNTY D&D r c l I T c it
��� - REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
I?'r-56o3 w
35=2345 I* 1=714=385=2345fr
1 ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST
1989-90 EDITION 1 3 !
04IPER ADDRESS / CARE OF EX-VST PARCEL NIJ. TYPE SQ.FT.-F UNITS SITUS ADDRESS CITY
CITY ZIP YEAR ROOM CT. DATE LAND VAL TFR VAL
? VAL HC/STS PHONE PARKING A P LOTSIZE DOCUMENT-X IMP VAL FULL VAL-YRI
_ VAL-rR `
i HELLER ALW W *HELLER SHIRLEY 1 7 8—3 7 4-0 2 RES 2070-2 16842 SEA WITCH LN HTB
HTB *16852 SEA WITCH LN *HUNTINATON BEACH,CA 92649 1968 8-3-2.5 12/30/85 144 388 245 000-F
332-77 ! i N TR 5050 LOT 111 ATACHD 6,954 85-520267-G 151, 9 296,657-86 ,
j UCER ISIK *UCER SEVIN HW 1 7 8—3 7 4-0 3 RES 2136-1 16822 SEA WITCH LN HTB
HTB *16822 SEA WITCH LN *HLWTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1966 7-3-2.5 6/24/87 219 742 325 000-F
r,a05-78 N TR 5050 LOT 112 ATACHD P 8,= 87-35992" 115,265 335,607-87
BERNFED ROBERT P *BERNFELD KRIS H-CP 1 7 8—3 7 4—0 4 RES 2848-2 16802 KAMALII DR HTB
I :J 0000-L N1TRR 50550 LLOOTI113 *HUNTINGTSN BEACH,CA 92649 ATACHD 1966 6,7900.5 83-43/999008-G 1444 2 358 91-84
3,B0-80 �
WARNOCK HUGH K *16792 KANALII DR H-BL 1 7 8—3 7 4—0 5 RES 2029-1 16M KAMALII DR HTB
►TTH f *HUNTINGTN BCK,CA 92649 1967 7-3-2.0 27 080
>5 000-Fi N TR 5050 LOT -04 (714) 846-0884 ATACHD 6,720 45,138 72,218-75
ii,625-87
LOSCIALPO ALEXANDER *LOSCIALPO ANNETTE S H-JT 1 7 8—3 7 4-0 6 RES 3224-2 16791 BARUNA LN HTB i
HT9 *16791 BARUNA LN *HUNTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1966 S-4-4.0 5/25/84 153 819
;,447--75i N TR 5050 LOT 115 BUILTN P 9,200 84-218221-6 105,991 259,410-78 �
CHICK ROBERT L *16811 BARUNA LN 1 7 8-3 7 4-0 7 RES 3112-2 16811 BARUNA LN HTB
�b0HTBD-89 *HUNTINGTN BCH CA 92649 1966 9-5-2.5 10/23/89 53 535
N TR 5050 LOT S16 ATACHD 6,545 89-568117-G 114,f33, 167,668-In
CAMPBELL MILA J *16821 BARUNA LN H-EA 1 7 8—3 7 4—0 8 RES 1991-1 16821 BARUNA LN HTB
z1 0HTEI i *HUNTINGTN BCH CA 92649 1967 -7-2-2.0 24 909
41-80 � N TR 5050 LOT 317 (714) 846-0275 ATACHD - P 7,366_ 51,446 76,855-75
GOLDENSON LEWIS W *16831 BARUNA.LN H-JT 1 7 8-3 7 4-0 9 RES 3250-2 16831 BARUNA LN HTB
HTB ? *HUNTINGTN BCH CA 92649 1966 9-5-3.5 12/15/70 25 197 - 62 000-Fi
:,202-761 N TR 5050 LOT 118 (714) 846-7317 ATACHD' - P 8,526 094890546 76,639 , 101,136-751
MAY HEW HENRY *2350 S JONES 0101-M 1 7 8-3 7 5-0 1. RES 2925-2 16712 BARUNA LN HTEI 1 *LAS VEGAS NV 89102 1965 8-4-2.5 4/19/89 60 0 1747�5HTB475}
•,W-75 TR 5050 LOf 16 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (714) 846-9574 5,000 89-204173-6 71, }
MILANO P R =-P 0 BOX 628 H-BL 1 7 8-3 7 5-0 Z RES 2066-1 16722 BARUNA LN HTB j
HTB *SUNSET BEACH CA 90742 1965 7-3-2.5 60 054
1
56- F TR 5050 LOT 1S ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS ATACHD - - 5,000 56,467 117,021-751
86
E.
HTBI SELVIN GERALD J *16732 BARUNA LN H-JT 1 7 8—3 7 5-0 3 RES 2238-0-1 16732 BARUNA LN*HUNT Hre j
1 TR' SO50INGTON 0 LOT 14 BEACH CA
(INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS 92649 1965
840-1846 ATACHD 1 5,000.0 097820001 56,S33/71 60 5 - 1163UF751,
213-75 1
ANDERSON JOSEPH H *ANDERSON CYN►HIA T. 1 7 8—3 7.5-O 4 RES564-2> 16742 BARUNA LN HTB
HTB *167 BARUNA LIN *HUNTI;W& BEACH CA 92649 1964 9-4-3.5.- V16/89 511 275
. ,440-75 TR.5050 LOT 13 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE AIGHfS ATACHD 5,000 89-435273-4 172,f25 683,400-88
PARKIN GREGORY L *2500 W ORANGETHORPE AVE H-JT 1 7 8-3 7 5-0 5 RES 2 16752 BARUNA LN HTB
3 000-Lj TR I5050VLOT 12 ALL (Imc ADJACENT iQFAGE RIGHTS 92633 ATACHD 1964 5,000.5 122000111039 99,4558 211,SP77
,`/32-83 ;
HTB j THOEPSON RALPH T *16762 BARUNA LN 1 7 8-3 7 5-0 6 REgg 3741-2 16762 BARUNA LN HTB
000-f *HUNTINGTN BCH,CA 92649 19�67 8-4-4.0 9/14/89 60 054
58-75 TR 5050 LOT 11 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (714) $40-2674 ATACHD 5,000 89-492029-G 79,118 139,372-75
;
cQ�v-p +%�T T-�
..I%c •
ANNIF snap
27-34563 - REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-'00-527-9663
'35-2345ii * - 4-385-�345
ORAN(;F MINTY aearFl 1 IcT ___ I
AMN was
- REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1- 'e)0-527-9663
s5-234s= ORANGE COUNTY PARCEL LIST -71 a=3as=23as ,
1989-90 EDITION E 1 3
044ER ADDRESS / CARE OF EX-VST PARCEL NO. TYPE SQ.FT.-F UNITS SITUS ADDRESS CITY
z VALITM HC/STS PHONE PARKING YEAR
P LOTSIZE. DDOCUIFNT-X IMP VAA LAND LL TFR FULL VAALL-YR 1
VAL-YR i CONQ`IN ROBERT R *16772 BAR;ANA LN HF-JT 1 7 8—3 7 5—0 7 RES
282-2 16772 BARUNA LN HTB
HTB ! *HLINTINGTN BCH,CA , 92649 1965 3-3.0 60 054
,971_T8 i TR SOSO LOT 10 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS (714) 846-2276 ATACHD 5,000 84,03 144,927-75 #
Hra { D*RNEW STEIN # SEE SITUS 1 7 S—3 7 5—0 8 199664 7-4 2.5 7/14/8967� 38837L" 181 DODO-L
���-F TR 5050 LOT 9 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN P 5,000 89-374137-6 142,W 525,1OQ-88
r 78 it DALE CHARLES TRACY *DALE MAUREEN M 1 7 8—3 7 5—0 9 RES 2925-2 16792 , BARUNA LN HTB
Ha *16792 BARIRU LN *HUNTfMGTON BEACH CA 92649 1965 8-4-2.5 12/05/86 401 615 533 50 I
TR 5050 LOT 8 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN 5,000 W599836-G 153,437 555,652-87
HTB KING PRESTON *KING MERLE TR TE 1 7 8—3 7 5—1 0 RES 3630-2 16802 BANANA LN HTB
*16802 BARLIMA LN *HUNTfNGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1965 8-4-0.0 3/02/89 396 406
,832-80 � N TR 5050 LOT 7 (714) 840-%80 ATACHD 5,000 89-111039-6 183,%01 579,807-841
RArDOLPH CARL L TR *16812 BARUNA LAI 1 7 8—3 7 5—1 1 RES 2879-2 16812 BARUNA LN HTB
HTB *H4WINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1964 8-4-3.0 12/22/86 60 055
3,685-75
N TR 5050 LOT 6 (714) 846-8817 ATACHHO 5,000 86-632897-* 108,254 168,309-75
HTB i LANGSTON OREM RX04E TR *16822 BARUNA LN H-TR 1 7 8—3 7 5—1 Z RES 2401-2 16822 BARUMA LN HTS
*M1IYTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1965 7-3-2.0 6/03/81 331 743
' TR 5050 LOT 5 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN BUILTN 5,000 140651063-H 114,99 446 429-80 ;
174-75 ! • • •
•.� 0HTS KAVASCH WILLIAM E *KAVASCH HELEN S H-CP 1 7 8—3 7 5—1 3 RES 2277-1 16832 BANANA LN HHTB
3,�4d-621
TR 5050 LOT 4 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN - (714) 846r9597 ATACHD H CA 92649 1965 5,000.0 84-242%28-G 64a10 5 -124,359-75
SOLUM JAHES R TR *16542 BARUNA LN H-TR 1 7 8—3 7 5—1 4 RES 3020-2 16842 BARUNA U HTEI
HTB } *HR�RINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1965 9-4-3.0 9/12/80 60 055
;3r54F-78# TR 5050 LOT 3 ALL(INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN (714) 846-9598 ATACHD P 5,000 137420481-H 113,Z57 173,512-75
HTEI SWARTZ DONALD P *1U52 BARUNA LN H-JT 1 7 8—3 7 5—1 5 RES 2620-2 16852 BANANA LN HTB
*HLNTINGTM BCH CA 92649 1965 8-4-3.0 6/17/76 112 298 171 000
J79 � N TR 5050 LOT (714) 592-5291 BUILTN 5,000 1177514" 93,956 205,15-4-771
+ LILLY LEONARD of3RD TR *16872 BOLSA CHICA STE 1 TE 1 7 8—3 7 5—1 6 RES 2925-2 16862 BARUNA LN HT9 ;
HTB *HLINTINGTON BEACH,CA 92649 1965 8-4-2.5 5/27/88 393 697 fi
:3,176-761 TR 5050 LOT 1 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN ATACHD 5,000 88-251346-6 141,171 534,860-871
HT9 ( HHUHRINGTON HARBOUR CORP *4241 WARDER AVE X-XF 1 7 8—3.7 5—1 7 . WHX VAC-LAND SITUS PENDING
i *t4DRINGTN BCH CA 92647 2/29/74. 137
-2,116-86I TR 5050 LOT A ALL. -LYING ADJACENT TO LOTS 1 TO 16 24,000 064.5000 137-75.
HWI NGTON HARBOUR CORP. *4241 WARNER AVE.. X-XF 1 7 8—3 7 5-1 8 wHx VAC-LAND SIMS PENDING i
?A 000Q-F *HHLKrINGTN BCH CA 92647 2/29/74' 137
3,�72-76 TR 5050 LOT 0 RECTANGULAR LOT IN LOT'100% 'INT - 36,000 ° 0645000 137-75
HTB **LIOSC�ANGFELEESS CE . *1435 TANAGER.WAY 90069 ' 1 7 8—3 8 —0 1 1965 �ffi 3.0 8/28/726702 . 960 O 5LN HTH t
?,748-75} TR 5050 LOT f7 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS 5, 102970486 73,973 133,728-75 _
THOWSON JOHN F * 1 7 8—3 8 1 -0 Z RE5 2 16692 BARMA LN HTB
.'-? 3,OO F * NEW OWNER * SEE SITUS 1 4-3.5 9/22/89 60 055 890 OOO-F.
a�_84
TR 5050 LOT 18 ALL (INC ADJACENT WHARFAGE RIGHTS DTACHD 5,000 89-509623-6 72,418 132,473-75j
MAP
'.27-9-663 1_���� - REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES - 1-800-527-9663
- <z-2345* # 1-714-
ORANGE . COUNTY PARCEL LIS' " 2345I .
CLT� Continental Lawyers Title Company
Subsidiary of LawyersTideinsurranceCorporation
PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATION
I , Lynn Tilley certify that on 3/14/90
the attached property owners list was prepared
by Continental Lawyers Title Company, pursuant the request of
Said list is a complete and true compilation of owners of the
subject property involved and is based -upon the latest
equilized assessment rolls.
I further certify that the information filed is true and
correct to the best of my knowledge.
Continen a Lawyers Title Company
By:_ y)YN
Date: . -
1015 N.Main Street,Santa Ana,California 92701 • P.O.Box 10100,Santa Ana,California 92711 • (714)835-5575
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California , on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME : Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission.' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION : 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE : Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REQUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2 , 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1 , of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved . There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal .period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion o.f the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway .
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
i
NOTICE. OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To con$truct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California , on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7.: 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE : Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REOUES'I': To permit the remodel and addition to ,an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2 , 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
? asp See- 0-1Xe W_ .S a/el
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved. There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review. period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story .addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California , on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE: R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REQUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2 , 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
?61se See,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved. There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten ( 10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street ,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2, 3)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE : Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REQUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes .a
2, 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
?61sp—
j
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved . There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE : A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department , 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE: R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REOU ST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2 , 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental, Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS: APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by . the applicant or an aggrieved party.
?61se- See, d-lifer. SvC1c
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved. There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within .ten (10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street , .
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above. If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO . 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coas.tal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE : Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REOUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2, 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
?base
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be -in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved. There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten ( 10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street ,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2, 3)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING .
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California , on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME : Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE: Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REOUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2, 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
?61 S P_
See- 011%e w— S,(A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved . There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271.
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To con$truct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California , on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
.DATE/TIME : Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE: R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REQUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2 , 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party .
See- 0-1XL1 _
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said. appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved . There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street ,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2, 3)
,I
I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center , 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME : Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : OO PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE : R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REOUEST.: To permit the remodel and .addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2 , 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL. STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
?61 S P_
See 04Xe*t_ StWc�
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said. appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved. There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten ( 10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed. Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street ,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above. If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence) .
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval .of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE: Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REOUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2, 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission .by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
?61se-
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved. There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department , 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above. If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME : Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE : Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REQUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2 , 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California.
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
? asp_
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said. appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved. There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten ( 10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
I
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been. filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME : Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE: Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REQUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2 , 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final. unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
? as P- See-
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved. There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten ( 10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date .
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street ,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street , Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/-TIME : Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commission ' s Approval of
Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island - Huntington Harbour)
ZONE: R1-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REOUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2, 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL .STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301, Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
?6se_
--
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said. appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved . There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten ( 10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed. Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
I
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above. If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant .Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
V ,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION' S APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-25/
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 90-1
(To construct a third story addition to a single family residence)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Huntington Beach City Council will
hold a public hearing in the Council Chamber at the Huntington Beach
Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on the
date and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the
statements of all persons who wish to be heard relative to the
application described below.
DATE/TIME: Monday, April 2 , 1990 , 7 : 00 PM
APPLICATION NUMBER: Appeal of Planning Commis,sion ' s Approval of
. Conditional Use Permit No . 89-25/Coastal
Development Permit No . 90-1
APPLICANT: Dr . James Schell
APPELLANT: Robert Chick, et al
LOCATION: 16872 Baruna Lane (Davenport Island —Huntington Harbour)
ZONE: Rl-CZ (Low Density Residential-Coastal Zone)
REOUEST: To permit the remodel and addition to an existing two
story single family residence . The addition includes a
2, 000 square foot third story.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS : Categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15301 , Class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act .
COASTAL STATUS : APPEALABLE (See Below)
This project is in the appealable portion of the coastal zone .
Under the provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code, the
action taken by the City Council is final unless an appeal is filed
to the Coastal Commission by the applicant or an aggrieved party.
?61 S e-
y
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Continued)
Said. appeal must be 'in writing and must set forth in detail the
actions and grounds by and upon which =the applicant or interested
party deems himself aggrieved. There is no fee for the appeal of a
coastal development permit . An aggrieved person may file an appeal
to the Coastal Commission within ten (10) working days from when the
Coastal Commission receives the Notice of Action from the City of
Huntington Beach, pursuant to Section 30603 of the Public Resources
Code, in writing to :
California Coastal Commission
245 W. Broadway, Suite 380
POB 1450
Long Beach, California 90801-1450
(213) 590-5071
The Coastal Commission review period will commence after the City
appeal period has ended and no appeals have been filed . Applicants
will be notified by the Coastal Commission as to the date of the
conclusion of the Coastal Commission review. Applicants are advised
not to begin construction prior to that date.
ON FILE: A copy of the proposed development plan is on file in the
Community Development Department, 2000 Main Street,
Huntington Beach, California 92648 , for inspection by the
public . A copy of the staff report will be available to
interested parties at City Hall .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and
express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application
as outlined above . If there are any questions or further details
necessary please contact Herb Fauland, Assistant Planner at 536-5271 .
Connie Brockway
Huntington Beach City Clerk
(4738d-2 , 3)
No_'
WHARFAGE T,C',T5 TR. 5264
107-5 2 TO 29 INC. HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS - 31
IN A 36 L A1Or I D/15 F D AREA O F LOT C^WHARFAGERIGHTSTOSALL OF LOT D' 178
LOTS 29 TO 5/ INC HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS
L 0 r A� a J� /.V A D£FIN£D AREA OF THE 400' CHANNEL
3�wHaRFAc.E AREA �� AS /OWN. 32 t too'
.
I
(SEELOT D�l
J,
I✓orFJ� ��� u
�O v A1./
LOr B
�. 658.5 ' PIERHEAO LINE
,
Lbr C GE
658.s I WHA FABUL EAO £E NCtTEI
6'•Q /, 4 5 67 8 9 1/ ✓2 I_3 N se.B4'/5 53.-8'I6 /7 48' 18
C) O O 10 I I 12 13 $ 14 .^ P 15 .m v. 16 \� I7
1. TRACT
� � 3
l!
h
/ LANE
Onv£NPORr PARK l o � � L �90
(c J� r"` 94 2J
II9
o.R LOT lee I07 59 m ti �)
l P C Y en
TRACT h a JG 56
o ° �� ti 11 0 N W O W 21 n o $ ✓°° —
z.7y' h m 20 R.S.69-17 21
O O 77 -
ll o n io° OS .o&" V i°S" S9 97 io5 V n o' 90 B9 6 O
+� 9 z h
"•Q, - PAI12- ` t m ®,�' 5..az saz' l O
se.s co' sRs• os�.se' 71 35 lb27 m
O O tiT O 19 21 0 0
y? 04 86e5 mq B3.jB" 99 96 89.7s' �1 �^ 86.Bg 9/ Be
A— u
SEA W/TCf1-� LANE - 3 0 z3 O
03 o /Do 95 , 92
W ?
60' •, 6p, 81. 72
FJ
N0.✓ °°a Js9g° �31 26 0 39g4 �16 23 ry 18 moo" 24
n 2 S o n 4 O Q 35? ', ` e7 �3
O O o 68 io5" Lai 73 n¢ O ! O $ 24
7 17 o z5 51 198
` (,5.��, 102 /0/ 191, I i33 9 93 i38" O 24 1.21 AC
63 64 65 O h �J 76 776 8 79 8t 82 3 84 6 \ ioo' 4C
ios" 7q B5 ioo' 7-7 c"K
C O O 0 6 Z ✓oo' 75 - o 25
0 9 8 7 o n O v O n g a 009
10 I I 12 13 14 15 o m 16 gq.,. Z —
O. 5y 32 �s 0
,4.T2
SOL ERO - L ANE 139
-5c Sa, 63 GGo. 5°.. ,. .. . .• ., ., a' {t1 7izy v.)/ qo i
�c83• �?
g 5O O O ni 4C o 45 �4 43 42 4 t �0 `3� 38 37 O O m O P. 28 2B o° oqp
5/ 50 49 48 4 46 45 4.4 43 42 4/ 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 5. 3/ 7B' 3 os
0 z? ' 70 97�G 5 640z•
4 I I I I I I I it'HAR.FAGE AfrEA (.EE NQT£f
--1--1 --L--I - -1--L— - - — — L—L— 1 -- --�--
EAST LINE OF 400 CHANNEL NOTE ASSESSORS BLOCK B, ASSESSORS MAP
DEEDED ro SrArE OF CALIF rRACF NO. 5/32 65 M.M. /82- 14 TO 20 INCL. PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 178 PAGE 31
AMRC.H /97/ IN BOOK 6358 PAGE 4 OF r-,-T .,� ., .,
,o� �� rn 7 f /n11-/ _......... ,., ,..,,,-, « /'n//NTY nF nRANrF
3361
/42 _
94� i5 0
iY
��.
4165
,` a
� TRACT_ `.' /so 143 9s9. 2�147 � P� ° 100
29
g 17 v
l., r O O7 4 IL O
67
P IIVpN�
O
u oz 43" 90 I I gl,6B
22o z/
„ 10 69y 19
�.o. .
c l� f s�.•7� S7"� 90 ja O ppy 21 2Dr
r 4o b
05 0 9 ��y>7O py
BC 82 B `J O o O 89
� b ,9
,-R 94 B J B6 88 99st.��711.
."3✓� �� 30 77 76 f �.. ,9 72
5.
` 29 �I b' 74 �e.3" 73 22 �i"•. ^�� �� �,�P
28 5a o 0j 18 h ��
� 3
dgs 17 r,
A
'z d 74 3 .�yd 16 l /6 V
./5 30
a ay83 IS 5a'� 23
s3. 459 14 .14 Lor A
'�.ro;.. 3• 45.24 13 5a�PLOr a
Lor 173 OR a .
� o 0 vse9 ys.N�' 'F 59
•
•/3
(
4 O 3 3 0 12 ,Al�Ot EI 10L,
� „ / 7 10 I I N �,
`r'0 2 O O // 15E 1.36 AC
3
9 0 E AR A
207
NP�F G
t 9
T, ^1
N0. 4880
Q �'•'�.� Lor C o NOTE
Q o LOTS 8 TO 21 INC HAVE
a O WHARFAGE RIGHTS /N A
Z
28 DEFINED AREA C.F LOr D
A S SHOWN.
•j.i p _ _ —J— 'ERHEAD LINE /
3A5 31
orn
/ac
PARCEL NUMBERS 6n '.178 !,,1, 32 �
.�lir)bb'PJ 1N C:t?C!tS rO1.n,:: r11- i�':!" G
IE ;/lE FOLLOWING L07-5 HAGC AO,IA CE%r/- WHARFAGE
R/6HTS IN AN UNDEFINED AREA OF LOT
LOTS 2,3,.5,6,�t AD 7 Z '
o W " 9 To 22 INC- a 78- 3 6 W J
r q 24, 25,AND 26 2 3 F J j t,
n p 26 To 4I INC. W o JJ 1��= /00, m
v " 43, 44, AND 45 4 o j
47 TO 60 INC AND 6^ 34
PHEL PS
`V Leo LC .. .. .. .. .. ,. 6O• 50' rvn 1a _e G3' F3.26 7S.2S-- `/ H
f4U
TR4CT o
p c/
I o 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 m I 2 3 4 O n e Ln o RJR/�E/
Q O e O O O O O" O O p O o O p O O p O O, 0 6 0 �� 81 UN LL
267 266 265 264 263 c15 26/ 260 259 256 70' Q �n 24 \ " 7
� 25T 256 2S5 254" 2 I�s 6/q3' O O py O 0
268 269 270 27/ 2T2 273 274 275 276 2T7 21 2T9 280 281'2''3" 25 v O
0 m 20 0 19 IB 17 16 15 14 13 12 o I 1 O 18 . 51
0 816 '0 p282 2264 249 V
Fo' 0 14 �"
�o p 13 2B5 12 286 o
nP C-O' .• GO _ 2pb o4 So 63" 53.23'
II
u 63
EP6EWATER 0 l0 n O
G3'
� 6y.
;36
OlOIr'C7T�)T bv6.32L ip0 \poO(�n 34�� ppyo h inOOo' OIB O9�1900 O
20•oo^H 4 2 OO2To1 o' oIVG' ¢mp +7 �
G/'
4 O o
STTORM 46 423ESMT i B 6 61 7o" 45 44 43 25 24s
2 (341 . T Nn� O56\ �S35s75o
'
°
747 4/
60 28 363 49gpd s5ss8'o
4���°, z29
se
7"
� 6�C Z obo-b
N
46 ./
4D 29 /0 f�3
,� 14
00
30 59 0 49 '061 0
30 20 h b
O � Too' 30" 3a' 39 /oo" a .00 O Too yy 11 � 2
58 0LQ13 H ° : 30' m p /oo' ° 30 3p• Too
50 y O ,>.r..3 32 H h 44 ^� J N `^• 1
Q o h 31 ,3.58 AC. 19
O b
96 ' 9a—q, Cl 5s3 5
0 9'26 31 FbR.LOTH m O ntiY 4 tl ea,4c m 0
o � o tlo �
NO S. 0 1�N_
m 9 �o ao a 3 11 n 3790 s2 3 30 33 17 O 2' 32 a.� /3 N O
c � _
oO8 a O 10 52 36 270^�6 28 '� 29 n ^60 47 48 �: 4 p Z
_aPsc' 54 53 76' p �30' 35 Too• 34 so' \ �/ /6 so• 15 Tao' 14�� ,yes Q
234 2 34 234"
POR. COT B WHARFAGE AREA �SENOTE)
306 3oG' 30G' �0
1
38 37 NOTE-ASSESSOR'' BLOCK B ASSESSOR'S MA
MARCH /97/ TR. NO 5360 �M M O-6 TO 14 /NCL. PARCEL UMBERS BOOK 178 PAGE 36
SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
OTE
LOTS I TO l6 INC.. AND 48 TO 59 INC OF
7R. 5050 HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN A �7a- 37
DEFIN,'D' AREA OF LOT A'' AS SHOWN.
LOTS 52. TO 54 TR. 5050 AND LOTS 52 TC 60 INC.
OF TR. 5264 HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN A DEFINED
AREA OF THE 400' CHANNEL AS SHOWN.
O� 38 75
0 46 0 p O
T .QC� O�. O 76 27 0 �- 1p5,05 p
Q0� IB F(17 49 0 60 77 26 `° O n O /5
2O 50 h do h
o O `-' 59 78 25 A\` 97 99 PARI �Ll O /4
5
/ Y Z 3
z
yo LP L 56 79 24 R� PM.27-23 J l3
/00V PAR,? O
57 23 96 xez 9
O BO o C� O ,2
02 ioa zz O o ~
_ It 95 10 // o
v 06 6 J
a,� B7 u° /0
O 55
5 2 a m It) 7 r 29 94
3 37.7
!� ; I.a2 /O
ca 7 Lv
54 O a) IAO" 55 uJ zsR 16
'` oasz o_ v
0 6 co
' �60/Jo 929/05 - 13 �� �Z 7Da 17 18
RAG RA � o 9 3 s" �� B
\ ^ r o 0 B2
O56 oa /06 0
15 � 92 //5 cc,x' / _ /00
5B 10 O B3 a 3e P�\\ O //4 //6 10 Q
Py � 7 W
Ln
a 18 3 `' 0�. O n
Q0 5a 57 II O 58 E4 0 4) ios.ao'
17 a2 a 6 �Q
z 56 3 C 12 O S O 1 Og 12 4 4�i= 10 85 3 /7
59 //2
_FAST LINE OF 400 \� _55 13 16 5p , �9 13 m 4
Ch'ANNEL DEEDED TO —'— IZ9' 4
574rE OF CALIF. IN O _ I I 60 6' -
6C0X 6366 PAGE 411 1 54 1
OF OFFICIAL RECORO.S— \= 14 O UA
66 Q 3
m IZ 6/ B7
\� 53
3I POR. LOT
o'
\ 16 N�5 BB 109
52
^ 0 62 /VO. 50
� g 13
No.52�' 31
MARCH 1971 TR. NO. 5132 M M. 182-14 TO20INCL. NOTE-ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 8 ASSESSOR'S MAP O
TR NO 5264 A!M. 185-27 TO 34 INCL. PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK178 PAGE 37
T,Q AIn l7n /J M /4/- 39 Tn 4.3 1AIrl SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
NOTE:
WHARFAGE RIGHTS TR. 5264 '
LOrS 2 r0 29 /NC. HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS I78-
36 IN A DEFINED AREA OF LOT"C'AS SHOWN.
LOT I HAS WHARFAGE RIGHTS TO ALL OF LOr �O.
LOTS 29 TO 5/ INC. HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS
LOT A_-) a J� IN A DEFINED AREA pF THE 400' CHANNEL
WHARFAGE AREA 19• AS SHOWN. 32 1 /00,
(SEE NOTE) _ s3O
� 2B.
LOT D `C l
..) ACT
LOT 9
6�.
° (V� 6,. ��� / 2?e> 658.S7' PIERHEAD LINE
J
0
L b r If I WHA FABGUL -AD ! A'F
Q 3 a, '?�>' i 658.5 REA (L5•EE NCITEJ
014 So "P o ^ ,�• 4 5 6 7 8 9 A� // /2 13 / Sa.94'15 S3-8'/6 /7 4B" /B
0 I ,,\
'V�^`ii ` 9 o
(3 D '5 6O 8O 10 II 12 13 a 14 _^0 15 'm 17 /
p A , -
3267 SO' .. ,. .. •• SO S.S 4410. V (o' 36,o)
b TRACT .�
t m
O q,`
DAVENPORT PARK ^ � ---o— � LANE
14 7r°19 0
2p.R LOT l08 /07 69 3G
TRACT J O29 8 ~ �So' O21 n ti a
R S O/6o9o-'I7 2o,0905 J b.�z
o 9p r oeO ' B9 � /oo'5a ioo.
_
h
Q 22
,�5a GOB ,a 5' 5 . 922
29
'-� 7l n 35 n - Q O O d 19 0 21 o `o
h
8�9 Dg•
SEA WIT LA l04 8GD5 99 96 83.71" LU 9' BB O18 6O .
O3 k 23
I00 95 92
72 03 LAJ o O
60 IQ 15
' 8 °N0.5 39. 24
O 9 B'� 1•�65 .05" LQ 73 a
7 z5 51 /96
8"0 "?.7,"?.7,90 9! (�5-�), 13G' l02 /0/ " I �33 9 93 /3e' 17 (o AC
3 64 65 76 77 78 79 8/ 82 43 84 6 J
/oo' A0
os'
sz�
6 /oo' 75 o B5 /oo' 6" 25
o (SJ O 26
7),
6 J 6 mgC7 ° CJ 0
O. 5132 c 2,
I �4.11 3
— —SOL ERO --�— L ANE °s —° k
4
31 � 19 �.7/JGB3 4 ip�O tip ,
�I
1.50> O Ti 46 0 45 �4 43 42 4l �0 39 38 37 O O O 31 8® O c 28 29 2Bh^c oq.
e �5 64
5/ 10 49 48 1 4 46 45 4-4 43 42 4/ 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 S/ 31 70' 30 2zo9' 7 g,ya >oz'
f I I I I WHAR�ACE AFEA (JEE Nc rE)
--- �--�— J —� — - -1--1-- — —�--L — L — �I — --� — =- --L—�- 1 —� ---� —
EAST LINE OF 400' CHANNEL NOTE-ASSESSORS BLOCK B, ASSESSORS MAP
DEEDED TO STATE OF CALIF TRACT NO. 5132 65 MM 182- 14 TO 20 INCL. PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 176 PAGE 31
Yfil-?CH 1971 N 9,120,1( e,3,P P4GE 4'% OF o
TRACT NO. 57.64 MM 185-27 TO 34 /NCL. SHOWN /N CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
178- 3�
J 0 ioo' 94 a
rRQcr. 150 onn m 65
93 I6
Oa; y 3`` /a4 100
o p� :66
O _ 02. Q 29
h 9 17 v
.67
RO U Nth'// z Az ,. �O.
>r.� >oa a3• 190 I I O 91.68
2 G.L S 10 �69 19 py <,
s7.91' S77 90 9� O P. 21 20
8/ O O O 70
0 u0 tia
a y 80 82 8 O o ' O B9 .s 20 ap a 20 /9 td�
79 `/
I�l 715 84 2 � 13 .:�. 9 1 39 71
BS B6)' 88 n 197NJ/ ,a 72
76 7tI 73' i1 79
8 V
2 �F.
sj 18 5 f �P
EnG 456 17
v
ATE Q d 9�2 7470
P
0 /5 30
a a�83 IS 5a'� 23
455 LOT A
O o O Ys,e as BJ J5..9+' aSBJ 13 ./3 9a. LOT A
`Jf 4 3 3 II o 12 Al� � EI eo 2ti
,_or r7� 6 (7 10 / Np1
o / \� O O (5E 1.36 AC.
9 /0
E
Qz i s 6 7 8 HARE G
O �27
N0. 4880
,V
LOT C o NOTE
o LOTS 8 7-0 21 INC HAVE
O o
ze WHARFAGE R/GH rS 6V A
-.0 _ OEF/NEO AREA OF LOT O
—� AS SHOWN.
? 14 ZC. r — — J— v
r _ _JE4MF•10 L%Nf
A5 31
o�
o,o rdUrL ,ti; .!`•5c;h� 6t�.x_n 8 aSSE:�.>� < r•
PARCEL NUMBERS Cn.-�` 178 32
fl---
l9a 4C / /07; TR. NO 4860 tit M. 172 - 12 To 19 /NCL
NOTE . THE FOLLOWING LOTS HAVE AD✓ACE/.'T WHARFAGE
RIGHTS/N AN UNDEFINED AREA OF LOT
LOTS 2,3,5,6,AND 7 2
o W 9 TO 22 /NC. 20 WL
c 1 78- 3
J
J •• 24, 25,AND 26 Z)W
28 TO 4/ INC.
•• 43, 44, AND 45 2 �O /��_ )OD J�
47 TO 60 INC.AND 6 k 0 34
ti
o PHEL PS 7,
Go' 50' o� �¢ 50' 63, 63.26 75.25' L qNE 41
TR4cF
0 c/' a ROO
0 0
Q m � O O O O 0 10 m O 0 O O o O � O pN 6 0 Any e�' giy6o OR7ELL
ro' 267 266 265 264 263 269 26/ 260 259 258 �o' Q >o' 257 256 255 254 1 c%o3• O 0 O n
268 269 270 27/ 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 28/z'2— 25 `282 v O9
2 60
2
'
W 20 `� 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 o I I R m 18 .p 17 16 0 15 p O 283/4 284> 250 249
m Q v 13 t Lu
60" ' U 2B5 286 >o/o
60 60 ,
�4 , •' , �P so' \ 63 63.2G' S3,23• 12 I I p Q
5 so' '�'e
63 I0
EDGEWATER n
3' 6a
ZOM1
eo' S. ell eo 50 ao' b? N >q' �G i' So' Si >< by �4/1/E
IC�163�7.', ipOj o O ac' 17 ^ , IB 19 20an 21 „G" x O � �37 °° O oO m O ac o 55 n� s.�>.• so
,O STORM •i0 0o Too' 46 °
OR4I,V.ESMT i \ 42 Too' 94' 27 23 aa' h n O• �2s
LZ �62 6/ /a' J 0 16 45 44 43 � ss'26 25 24sc' �22
zz.eo v 8 � 57 48 °
�; C3 .,0 22 b V 35 z�N so' 29, 41 (� O , Z7.6 om 59 y
° 47 4/ 28 74s.s Too 363i o O 9 0 6 I N
60 0 IS O H O o O 2/67JC. 42 0 \ iao.oz /s3so ss• 14 `�e2
O ° 48 yo 40 29 eo 2I
b /O O V
59 0 3 ,
14 Too Too
49 24 r, 33 30 20
cj Too' moo" :30 39 /oo"
58 00 lLl 13 O n �o' 30' °� O oo' o 3o' —o
50 h 25 Q n.Gi 32 h h 44 �l N N /
° Q O 3/ 3.5B AC. /g �v' 2" 51 4,
38 � _, 9a.ie- M ,n sG/s aa- Q o.ze' /20
3 12 v m
M 57 m 9.a6 l� v, m y Q ea.ac
u M 1 0 PoR.LOT A
e3.90 °� 26 31 0
O 5/ m m h m
o 32 /B ti 9 NQ 5360 0
30 3�, ,cI n 37azG �� '�2' 32 30 33 /7 46 v 32" g2 9 2-� /3 N O
m 27 o O 56 n� C\O d 10 52 36 0�� 28 , 29 ''o n m °V 47 48 4 �
O O O .� L�
55
�p x ? Q
sc' S4 ,oz' S3 �6" v -'30' 35 Too' 34 a>' \ •/ l6 -� I5 /oo' /430�1 3�es Q
�34 LJJ 234-.
POR. LOT B o WHARFAGE AREA SEE NOTE) 60'
3oG' 3oG'
38 37 NOTE -ASSESSOR BLOCK a ASSESSOR'S MA
MARCH 1971 TR. NO. 5360 M. M. aV-6 TO /4 INCL. PARCEL UMBERS BOOK 178 PAGE 36
SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
LOTS I TO 16. /NC. AND 48 TO 53 INC OF
rR. 5050 HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN A _837
DEFINED' AREA OF LOT A" AS SHOWN. 17 J 1
LOTS 52 TO 54 TR. 5050 AND LOTS 52 TO 60 INC.
OF TR 5264 HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS /N A DEFINED
AREA OF THE 400' CHANNEL AS SHOWN.
38 - oa /6 tea'
6° o 0 o O
V0�0 T 48 AC7' 0
O
Qo O O 0
1� I$ 49 60 /5
77 26 O
(P 50 O 50
z ,`(`
1 0 98 —
40�� oO 59 78 25 A\` /� 97 99 PARI = O /4
51 ° O Oe
yo LP b° 58 79 24 v q RM 27-23 v O /3
52 =c,y O 96 ,,/00 PAR 2
Z.
nN 0-5
v� o 57 go _ 23 4 �O 3 /2 ti
I �5) 4O o 5 �- D O 02 Ioszz'
y 3 /0/ J J
°°
1 �q� 'a O ~
53 10
54 �' 55
C41 O oa 5z 16 o V
H Ioo / O 3 se 93 �6 I$
$ o m 92 13
6o Q� tRAcT 20 /05 �F y �a 17 r�
H k $ O
\ w TRAM m
?- 59 O O 56 B2 I°° 10e b o 14 k� O 9
/00,
OO //6 10 Q
\ n 6 `
O7
a 18 5P 0� ^ 7 Q
O II W� W
57 II O 58 B4 o O ios.ao' 6 :�Q
a 56 12 S 1/3 O f2 W W
\ z 10 59 85 O3 I 17 5 Y
3
FAST [.INF OF 400' 55 13 16 Hv-- 9c�a m �g '� 13 m 4
CHANNF, DEEDED TO / -C 66 �Z �h 4
.STATE OF CALIF. IN ` \ _ O - I I 60 3 _ //l /18 -
HOOK 6365 PAGE 411 � \/ 54 � cc_ 15 Q •� � � .
J O
�c OFFICIAL RECORDS -`-- 44. -1 3
\ m 12 6/ 67 Q cfl M O/2//66 O m —
\ 53 O 14 pO• - 15
Is 513z ' . PDR LOT
\ � Is -�. N� 62 68 /09 �, o NO. 50
52 \ g 13
h 16
/ No 526 31 s
MARCH 1971 TIT. NO. 5132 IV.M 182-14 TO20 INCL. NOTE-ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 5 ASSESSOR'S MAP
TR NO 5264 M M. 185-27 TO 34 /NCL. PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 178 PAGE 37
TR NO- 5050 fef. M. 191- 39 TO 43 1NCL. SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
NOTE
WHARFAGE RIGHTS TR. 5264
LOTS 2 TO 29 INC. HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS t78_
31
36 /N A DEFINED AREA OF LOT C'AS SHOWN.
LOT I HAS 91HARFAGE RIGHTS TO ALL OF LOT D.
LOTS 29 TO 5/ INC HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS
LOT A J� IN A DEFINED AREA OF THE 400' CHANNEL ��
33p . /••- /00, .14•HA•iFAGE ARE AS SHOWN
A Q � �
(SEE NOTE) K .1 0: Q
LO/T D O
i\ 6320
ro 311 Q° a ACT 7 4so.e4
'p>.6,. LOT B
C, v, l vie] 6Se.5)' PIERHEAD LINE
QP 3 / a I I LbT C WHq FACE REA /ISE£ Nqr£) l
0 a<r, ? G58.S1 BULKIIEAD I L INE s
4 S 6 7 B 9 A9 /l l2 /3 / So.Ba'/5 53,oe'l6/7 Ge' ��
o
Jo. \ °1 '�J `I 5 O O O 10 II 12 13 0 14 a 15
P � �
0
�b TRACT � ?6>32.G@ 3;,'_ Sa SO SS 4¢lo V 5o M 360)
g�'4 IB h
/ DAVENPORT PARK LANE
c m
."riR LT l08 !07 5-9
»=r II�..n- l!/\ J 20 J6 56•
119
09 TRAc T j h 1 O n 21 n 2.79 70 R.5.69-/7 2/
v �°� ioa' �05 /05" .R4 7 /05 V �i o' 90 _>LQ 67]O
P,Ir/2 q M Op` 5.4z � _ saz a mk,�. 92
69 00 oo' h
.-58.5r s8.99' 7/ n 35 y� n 2T22
'Q ;EA W/T -�..� ��"LANO Oa Beres B3je99 96 s3.7s BBO03 ° /Do95 < 23 W72 J I�JIVO 5 � °off. 39 ° . 67". 18 60 24�,,� s5B7 �3CO6 105' 4j 73 ro 36 C� 3 7 zs .98
24 AC
89 90 9/ O � � oEsc' r02 /0/ ]a3' /33" 9 17
63 64 \ 65 `^ 5 76 77 B 79 B1 B2 93 64 J
6 00' qC
74 B5 /oo• 73.z3" c"6
c,n O
09 O O o n6 O /0C�oO 7n$ O o O8 0 IO It 12 13 14 15 16 25 —
s4.7� h
O. 5 2 �s 2,
Jq.)r
__--- =SOL ERO LANE °s --D
54' S3 I Go. 50. •, Jo• ie7 ?,2, z 40 O
0
.. ., .. .. .. .. ., .. .)/11.3 �9
�, }
(� O O ��J 46 0 45 �4 43 42 41 �0 39 38 37 O O O �3 O 31 0 O O P 28 2Bh o oqw
o 29
51 50 49 48 ?1 4 46 45 4-4 43 42 41 40 39 36 37 36 35 34 33 32 57 3/ lB" 30 z�as• �B 9>9e�5 640z'
:{ I WHAR�AGE AREA ( E£ N rE) 1 /
----'-- L— ' —1--�— J- -L— — —�--� — ' — --L �-- —L-1-- --- ---'—
EAS T L;1:E OF 400 CHANNEL 65 NOTE-ASSESSOR S BL OCK B. ASSESSOR S MAP
MARCH /97/ DEEDED ro SrATE OF CALIF TRACT NO. 5/32 M.M /82- 14 TO 20 INCL. PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 178 PAGE 31
v eccx hiss PACE of TRACT NO. 5264 M.M. /B5-27 TO 3 .4 INCL. SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
33
178— 3C
64 107
J o " 94 a
H EST,00,9T
,�a....•� J� a� ti � ,a 14 � h p
�a 65
TRACT. /50 /49 /43
1 �5 v.
O O y n!6 h,. "j. O Q 93 16
146/45 �, 66 /00
3 I O - ti 9 Q
g 29
a 0 e p 17�; O !n 5 V
7 o-. 12
�J190
50
. II 9/066
695 19 21
3 �;� •'� s»o s'''� 90 20
y B0 62 8 5 O O B9 . 70 20 by 20
3i 79 77 65 66. �� 66 7g56`! 21 a " 19 po Q
p O 76: w,,'67 76 3/ a,A
i! 74 73
72 /B 0
29 r'I 1 '
28 Y Sd. o O �) 18 5 P
7's" 25 24 ��- •�
p a58 17 /i�
/6
H
r�
6 ' F 'ATE'Fi' 7N /902 71 70
(,D a5 0 ./5 23 30
45p4 14 .!4 Lor A
524 R
rs.ao .�se� as as.e' 13 /3 5° Lor Lad
, 3 3 _'2 p,N�1 E1 z4 �9'21 IO
`
LOT l:3 � ro./ C O
,
Z 3 7 O 1 // SSE 1.36 AC.
4 o -5 9 o
E nR A
p 27 o N
_ W N0. 4880
e,
? Lor c o" NOTE
Qo tors 6 ro Z/ INC. HAVE
o
2 28 WHARFAGE RlGHrS 64' A
OEF/NEO AREA OF LOT O
AS SHOWN.
j F /4 .:c.
_ — — 7 —j
3A5 31
o�
140 o,ti ASSE;�.,-)? h i
m o
PARCEL NUMBERS CC? " 178 /' 32 pp
6—�
TR NO. 4Rf',) Af. 1V /7•9 - /7 ro !Q /NCL
NOTE r IHE FOLLOWING LOTS HAVE AO✓ACElrT WHARFAGE
RIGHTS INAN UNDEFINED AREA OF LOT
LOTS 2,3,5,6,AND 7 2
o w " 9 TO 22 INC. 20 W L
178- 31
2925 AND 26
28 TO 9I INC.
v -- 43, 44, AND 45 1 o h Q, /��_ )00� J
47 r0 60 INC.AND 6 k .34
ti
o PHEL PS
C.;0•. So' up �a so' 69' F3.26 75.$S' LgNE 41
T CT �o o
0 c/ Rp
I o 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 m I 2 3
O ° O ° O O °
0 6 oO e�
0 �' 267 266 265 264 263 cY 26/ 260 259 258 70' Q 70' 257 256 255 254syH 2 �.
268 269 270 271 2T2 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 260 28/rz.i3• P5 \ O v O n
LLl 282 '95I 0 60
mm. 20 ,0 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 o I 1 ° O m 18 .° 17 16 0 15 ° O 083 284 0�250 249
° ° 13 2e5 lye
286
P a 12 (y
63' 63.ZG' S3.
s GO� .Ga so' t➢ c s°� 6j- 10 n Q
0
u EDGEWA TER
� 64.
dc' so' b. .a. do 50' S0' ° Bo' b? T7AANE
POP. iLOT 632 so/OSTO.RM046nV.ES,NT i42 Boa' 9 23 s4'� �62 6I 7o' J 0 16 45 44 43 � 4a' --2z.� il .e3. 857 25 29 i 47 zSn' -z9 41 h v ^`� 7 h
1� 0 4/ 28 22 O ae,so" 6 y
60 O O IS Lj o0 363 o iao.oz 9 's3 5 s 4 97.e7'
O h 0 O 2./6 c. 42 so 44' N
O 46 yo 40 29 90 2/ h 53 /0 33�s O f
59 14 b
ioo ioa
.3o 49 24 r,
30 cYJ
-10' 30 39
58 5 LLJ 13 H O ° : 3io' 30" m O ioa" 30' gp• / ioo oa L-a Z 0 50 y 25 Q ,. 32 h h 44 � Jm Nz9� 51 M
0 O q 3/ 3.58 AC. /9
a O 98,96 38 xis as Q o.ze' l2m
ry 57 O.3 0
^S 12 �� �, 9.a6' � ll s,• � FOR.LorA 'H
Ea.sa `Vt2631 0 o O O 0
O s.. 5/ O c 32 16 0 " 0 ell
,
o Mo -II 37 G �' ao 9y sz� /3 NO.53.0 N
9 3p. 30 n 9Z• '�2' 3'• 33 /7 O 2 32 N O
56 o ` m 27 o 30 49
O8 O9 10 52 36 0^� 28 :� 29 c n °4 47
55 p - 's � � � C P• � d o a J
o Rsc' 54 ioa 53 76 6p 30 35 roo' 34 vo' v \ / /6 90 15 ,
234 2 34 2 94
POR LOT8 " WHARFAGE AREA SEE NOTE) �•
306" 3oG" ioG" d
38 37 NOTE -ASSESSOR' BLOCK a ASSESSOR'S MA
MARCH 1971 TR. NO 5360 M. M. XO-6 TO /4 )NCL. PARCEL UMBERS BOOK 178 PAGE 36.
O,
SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
NOTE: l
LOT-5 / TO I6 INC. AND 48 TO 53 /NC OF
TR. 5050 HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS /N A 178_ Z�
DEFINED" AREA OF LOT �" AS SHOWPI. V J
LOTS 52 TO 54 TR. 5050 AND LOTS 52 TO 60 INC
OF Th. 5264 HAVE WHARFAGE RIGHTS IN A DEFINED
O( AREA OF THE 400' CHANNEL AS SHOD NN
J $. 38 75
Too 16. 3.�.
4g 0 p O
T, AC 49 Do- coO 76 27 0° �_ p5,o s�
a.
/5
18 P o 60 77 26 G 7
`_n4 50 O 5 do �'-
h
O 97 99 PAR/ /4
V 9s O
51 U 59 25 �A� /� = 3
5s 79 2L O � PAI.27-23 v /3
52 5 O
9 0„ �_ /00 PAR 2
57
I N^ ti o. 4 80 23 4 3x- 9 3 /2 m
0 O 02 /oau' O5 of O
95
O 55
\ 53 za. 5 3� O 9 94
pp' 37. m o'
°0 55 / 7 zsa 12 4 ky p /O
C �� 5410- , / ioa Sz 16 o U O
3
Q
60 °� grRgGT ro 20 k92 ��� �2 �¢ 17 �;
TRAMT �0 �° 0� e 9
o VAO 82 0° l06 0 l4 k 6
- 59 O 56 O9
m 19 15 92 0 //5 8 /00
S8 IO O 83 0 9� ,,AAP\\\ O //9 116 10 Q
a 18 as 7 r
57 II O 64 O II W� W
2
656
a 12 10 B5 8 O //3/; O8 v� 12 2 2
3 SQ 5 Y W
EAST LINE OF 400' \\' 55 (1,
CHANNEL DEEDED TO --5--'— 13 O jz9•`�° O 13
STAr£ OF CALIF. IN I �\ _ O I I 60 3 _ /// 118 4 -
Q
6COX 6368 PAGE •1/1 54 `� �] 15 ,
pF 01FICIAL RECORDS-_._- 14 O w 9�
O 66 3
m 12 6I 87 o N
O53 15 14 60
00 POR LOT
109
N
O 62 8B NO. 50
\ 52 26a" g 3 h 16
NO 5 a 3 Too / 70 s•
MARCH 1971 TR. NO. 5132 A4.IV. 182-14 7-0201NCL NOTE ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 8 ASSESSOR'S MAP O
TR NO 5264 M.M. 185-27 TO 34 INCL. PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 178 PAGE 37
TR NO. 5050 41. M 191- 39 TO 4.5 /.NC/-. SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
t '
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays, and City Council- March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.: We, the home owners of Huntington Harbour, feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved. '
Therefore, we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit# 89-25/
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit # 89-57/costal development permit
# 89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence- Signature
i-
/6 /
It;�PJ b 9S Z �/�le v N/4 L n/
�v. C w► ivv s 3 I �e �w a C° .
5a
�'ti rt t Cl.L AMtW ' 0. Le_ 'aw tV`
L
s _
A 2-
16912, 1
A L .�f I I !-((-•,`7 1�.i C$li I t. �L ` 13�a�'a.v�a /!�i F_ _.(_�'l,b�"�'/ J ..��•...r _L"y��
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays, and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Baruna Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We, the home owners of Huntington Harbour, feel that these enormous three story ,
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved.
Therefore, we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit# 89-25/
coastal'dcvelopment permit#90 -1 and conditional use permit # 89-57/costal development perrnit
# 89-32 for the some or all of the 12 masons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence Signature
E/ c IV �l �'1 c rt cs•w�
�i9�Pa L 7CA/PE h1p,
I
e_ 88 r e
l= r RL ftoJR - -,
i
- f
�4t�tc� L` . ��—►<SS lte�83< 5
0-0 Lhc� 3 f
�L[ � f`1/_ ���- ..Z„4 "C� ��f'_� .,Z f):t 7c< -rt. �` '� l icy' -l� '� 'Jc�•u i'�
AlICO AAA 5 M. t:: M mE I bps-Z- C_4ROUSF-L `L .
Cg"�Das t;-L LV
16
ZVe
% `"� J -
i' ! f, 1 - /
I
To Huntington Beach Mayor,Tom Mays, and City Council: March 2, 1990
We, the undersigned have seen and reviewed the proposed plans for converting the two -
two story residences into three story residences at 16872 Banana Lane, H.B. and at 16391 Ardsley
Circle, H.B.. We, the home owners of Huntington Harbour, feel that these enormous three story
homes will be an imposition on the residences of Huntington Harbour and should not be approved. -
Therefore, we are appealing the Planning Commission approval of conditional use permit# 89-25/
coastal development permit#90-1 and conditional use permit # 89-57/costal development permit
# 89-32 for the some or all of the 12 reasons stated on the accompanying detailed letter.
Name Residence Signature
r
-I CA,\\,
-J tl o-)l-) i 14 t"h
,Name/
Residence
Si nature
vib
-Signature --
l CAS o ^ y�� 131�r lairA i iy, `
- Namc Residence Si Tnaturc
f� •
Name Residence 7777 Si nature
a � j91J1
..
Name Residence Signature
Wttr,4 ��_ 672F_�A-U_ o I p C) _A�elc�14
to N2�,L'� 1
- - - - --
Name Residence Signature
C z c
Name Residence Signature
NARY t . bAiZo�va, LANE -
Name Residence Suture
o ,
Name . Residence Signature
ORN JF-N ,9FNI(� 312 ConrrE�n CIR
Name. Residence Signature
T w7
Name Residence signature
Hsu l2 10�,R C�oti,.- r��~ r
Name Residence
Signature