HomeMy WebLinkAboutDesignation of Wetlands in the Coastal Zone - An Assessment REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
c•-bmitted by James W. Palin Department Development Services
,.ate Prepared January 25 19 80 Backup Materiel Attached 0 Yes No
Subject Designation of Wetlands in the Coastal Zone
City Administrator's Comments
Statement of Issue, Recommendation, Analysis, Funding Source, Alternative Actions:
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
A map delineating wetland areas within the City' s coastal zone has been
developed by the California Department of Fish and Game and reviewed
those state agencies having permit or review authority over wetlands.
resentatives of those agencies will be present at the February 4th
Council study session to discuss these areas as related to the City' s
local coastal plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
Provide input to staff and state agencies concerning the wetlands map
and text.
ANALYSIS:
The California Coastal Act requires that local coastal plans delineate .
wetland habitat areas and establish policies for their protection and
enhancement. The City' s Local Coastal Plan work program does not include
.funding to map wetland areas; this requires definitive identification
by professional biologists. City planning staff in November 1979
requested the Regional Coastal Commission coordinate wetlands mapping
efforts among state agencies. As a result, the Commission, in cooperation
with-the Department of Fish and Wildife, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers ,
developed the attached map and text. A glossary of terms used in the
text and an outline of the permit and review authority of each agency
involved in the mapping are also attached.
Under the Coastal Act, wetland areas must be provided maximum protection
-hin the local coastal plan. In essence, no residential, commercial
industrial development may take place. Human uses would be oriented
toward nature study and other passive activities. General Plan designa-
tions for such areas would be "open space, " "conservation, " or "natural
resources. "
Request for City Council Action
,'anuary 22 , 1980
Page 2
'I'lie intent of this study session is to acquaint the Council with the
state regulations and attitude regarding wetlands as mapped in the
City and to allow the Council opportunity to question and give comments
to Federal and State agencies and staff.
Respectfully submitted,
,James W. P lin, Director
Development Services
JWP :JWC: s
Attachment: Map and Text
y t
■ COMM --,
ih
v � RESIDENTIAL ........., �� �. ! I
LU
co _ .M (^� l.: RESIDENTIAL -
i. C F R
- " * FUEL STORAGE BARREN
��wTq
!w_F., I 17
• t
TANK 111
1_
ILT
I",,I LTA j ' OIL SUMP
INDUSTRIA ROTARY
BOAT - i - MUD
. �
SALES _ y ■
'�• +: \ Mobile Home D U M P �
Par
—N,`—
``T=%% C•�` r ^ >\'\... FUEL STORAGE J
O
HM6UN Co` i r I / Z
POWER PLANT
PACIFIC OCEAN \ L• ��'C
LEGEND ,fr, C q .� o �• A.
O
COASTAL SALT MARSH _
C
':BEACH -qy _
Q COASTAL SALT FLAT
FRESH/BRACKISH WATER
MARSH
-
® RIPARIAN AREA "-
® STANDING WATER AND
FLOOD CONTROL DIKES
RESTORABLE AREAS " -'-
�` ^1�' WHICH HAVE BEEN FILLED CAI-
AND/OR
CLEARED �19
ti
(See Accompanying Text)
im , Coastal Zone Boundary
WETLANDS AS DEPICTED BY THE DEPT. OF FISH AND GAP4E
January 1980
1 <
IIANNIN'• , AVI !
Z
w W
�ItI1I! Illy.I1ITi.l11 II r I, II
"'V ILi
R r* ut.'w�l. ...�i,/cc
.:
S RESIDENTIAL L X
Lw-
`LM RESIDENTIAL
I I i
_ RESIDENTIAL I Iat
CAI-
RYI
—
�r��'✓r * "- SEWAGE FACILITY v
r
oil A.
ORANGE COUNTY
SANITATION TREATMENT
PLANT
ysr�. ^• -
LEGEND
COASTAL SALT MARSH 4
BEACH -a• `
COASTA L SALT FLAT •�; ���-. �-- `"
® FRESH/BRACKISH WATER \, C
MARSH
® \ _
RIPARIAN AREA
® STANDING WATER AND
FLOOD CONTROL DIKES
RESTORABLE AREAS
' WHICH HAVE BEEN FILLED
AND/OR CLEARED
(See Accompanying Text)
eme Coastal Zone Boundary
WETLANDS AS DEPICTED BY THE DEPT. OF FISH AND GAME
January 1980
i J"t Jl. j Li, i
'd
� , 1' I V �a•oP� a .L. .�1-t
CF-.R
o y ; L "U,
I
0f1T �
Q
w
m 2
ROTARY
� _ _ M U D
U—O
D U M P
E� ,
��o" _ _ ono z
PACIFIC OCEAN \ f.
.4, o � O
Cb
(4)
(6) a .
KEY
_(IT CalTrans 20.86 acres
(2) Mills Land & Water 16.66 acres sr^
(3) McVicar 9.26 acres
(4) So. Calif. Edison 19.98 acres
(5) Orange County Flood Control -N C,�
District 4 . 19 acres
(6) a. Thorne 10„ 41 acres
im ,Coastal Zone Boundary
WETLANDS AS DEPICTED BY THE DEPT. OF FISH AND GAME
OWNERSHIP AND ACREAGE*
*In gross acres. Acreage and boundary does not indicate each
owner' s complete holdings in the coastal zone .
January 1980
BANNINI, 1 AVE
Ou
-
Qy 3 � r c. uwu c•
d _ j •
( •H- -
I
11
TUT
♦ li ® • Q
YTI
J
t --
C CfY c \ ORANGE COUNTY ••
SANITATION TREATMENT
c PLANT
Cp
qs o
T
(
va
\L� tirC ,J
y
KEY
(6) b. Thorpe 36.05 acres tiw
(7) a. CalTrans 27.80 acres
(7) b. CalTrans 21 . 99 acres / ^
-N-
III = iCoastal Zone Boundary
WETLANDS AS DEPICTED BY THE DEPT. OF FISH AND GAME
OWNERSHIP AND ACREAGE*
*In gross acres. Acreage and boundary does not indicate each
owner' s complete holdings in the coastal zone.
January 1980
GLOSSERY OF TERMS
Utilized in Department of Fish and Game Report
I . ".Ec_osystem" means the complex of a natural community and its environ-
ment functioning as a unit in nature. (Webster ' s Dictionary)
3 . "Environmentally sensitive area" means any area in which plant or
animal life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable
because of their special role in an ecosystem. (Section 30107 of
the Coastal Act) .
3 , "Wetland_" is land which may be covered periodically or permanently
with shallow water and includes salt water marshes , fresh water
marshes , open or closed brackish water marshes, swamps and mudflats .
(Section 30121 of the Coastal Act) .
A more specific definition of wetlands recognized by the Coastal
Commission is provided by the U .S . Fish and Wildlife Services
(U .S .F.W.S. ) for purposes of technical identification:
"Wetland" is land where the water table is at, near or
above the land surface long enough to promote the for-
mation of hygric soils or to support the growth of hydro-
phytic plants. (U.S .F.W.S. )
4 . "Hygric soils" are soils that are saturated with water at or near
the surface and are deficient of oxygen long enough during the groc,-
ing season to result in properties that reflect dominant wetness
characteristics near the soil surface. (U .S.F.W.S . )
5. "H dy rophytic plants" are plants which grow in or near water, wet
habitats or hygric soils. (U.S.F.W.S . )
6 . "Flats" are wetland areas where vegetation is lacking and soils are
poorly developed or absent as a result of frequent or drastic fluctua-
tions of surface-water levels and/or high concentrations of salt or
other substances in water or substrate. (U.S .F.W.S . )
7 . "Fresh water marshes" are marshes where the water has concentrations
of salt less than five parts per 1000. (U.S .F .W.S . )
8 . "Brackish water marshes" are marshes where the water has concentra-
tions of salt ranging between five parts and thirty parts per
1000 . (U.S .F.W.S . )
9 . "Iialine water" is water with salt concentrations of 30 to 40 parts
per 1000 where the salinity is derived from the ocean. (U.S .F .W.S . )
10 . "Hyperhaline water_" is water with salt concentrations exceeding 40
parts per 1000 . (U.S .F.W.S . ) '
"I.6_1>arian habitats" are areas exhibiting vegetation characteristics
of Lliose which (.1row adjacent to freshwater water courses and the
c�:ssociated animal species. (U.S .F.W.S . )
Page 1
12 . "Tidal influence" means an area is affected by tides via subterranean
or surface connection to the ocean. (California Department of Fish
and Game [D.F.G. ] )
13 . "Restorable Salt Marsh" is a wetland which is filled and/or cleared
and which may be easily restored as coastal salt marsh. (D.F.G . )
14 . "Feasible" means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner
within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economics ,
environmental, social and technological factors (Section 30108 of the
Coastal Act) .
15. "Levees" are embankments to protect flooding. (Webster ' s Dictionary)
16 . "Biological productivity" refers to the rate at which energy is stored
as organic material. Factors which indicate the quality of productivi-
ty include the efficiency of the transfer of stored organic material
as food. (D.F.G. )
SUMMARY OF STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATORY IN` QLVEMENT
REGARDING WETLAND AREAS
The alteration of wetlands associated with development, such .Is
di.kinq, dredging or filling is subject to the r.equlatory require-
ments of several federal and state agencies . For development in
wetlands to occur, permits or agreements by the California Coastal
Commission (CCC) , the California Department of Fish and Game , and
the Corps of Engineers must be obtained. Additional permits or
approvals may be needed by the State Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) de-
pending on operation proposed; and the State Lands Commission (SLC)
if the project is proposed on land that is owned by the State .
A. Coastal Commission
Decisions regulating development in the coastal zone made by
the Coastal Commission in permitting and Local Coastal Plan
certification are based upon policies in the Coastal Act of
1976 .
Provisions for protecting and enhancing wetlands :
1. Environmentally sensitive habitat areas shall be protected
against significant disruption of habitat values (Section
30240-a) .
2 . Development adjacent to environmentally sensitive habitat
areas shall be designed to be compatible with the continu-
ance of such habitat areas (Section 30240-b) .
3 . Coastal-dependent developments shall not be sited in a
wetland (Section 30255) .
4 . Marine resources shall be maintained, enhanced and, where
feasible, restored (Section 30230) .
5. The biological productivity of wetlands appropriate to
maintain optimum populations of marine organisms shall be
maintained and, where feasible, restored (Section 30231) .
Types of Development Permitted in Wetlands :
1 . Wetland restoration activities (Section 30233-a) .
2. Nature study, aquaculture or similar resource-dependent
activities (Section 30233-a) .
3. Incidental public services which temporarily impact the re-
sources of the area, such as burying cables and pipes , and
maintenance of existing intake and outfall lines (Section
30233-a) .
4 . Entrance channels for new or expanded boating facilities
may be constructed in wetlands (Section 30233-a) .
Page 2. ,
5 . In degraded wetland, as identified by the Department of
Fish and Game, boating facilities other than entrance
channels may be constructed under special circumstances
(Section 30233-a) .
6 . Coastal-dependent industrial facilities , such as commercial
fishing facilities, may be constructed or expanded (Section
30233-a) .
7. Energy facilities may be constructed or expanded (Section
30233-a) .
8. Port facilities may be constructed or expanded (Section
30233-a) .
9 . Existing degraded depths in navigational channels, turning
basins and boat launch areas may be maintained or previously
dredged depths may be restored (Section 30233-a) .
B. California Department of Fish and Game
Pursuant to Sections 1601 and 1603 of the Fish and Game Code,
The Department of Fish and Game (DFG) regulates wetland altera-
tions. A written agreement issued by the DFG satisfying Sec-
tions 1601 and 1603 is required prior to any development in
a wetland. The DFG is directed by the State Endangered Species
Act and the State Native Species Conservation and Enhancement
Act to protect the State' s endangered species .
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 28 (September 13, 1979) has
given the DFG the responsibility of proposing plans to protect,
preserve, restore , acquire and manage wetlands . In addition,
the DFG reviews and comments on development permits issued by
the Coastal Commission and the Corps of Engineers .
Both the Coastal Commission and the DFG take under advisement
the State Resources Agency Basic Wetlands Policy which states :
"It is the basic policy of the Resource Agency that this Agency
and its Department, Boards and Commissions will not authorize
or approve projects that fill or otherwise harm or destroy
coastal, estuarine , or inland wetlands .
Exceptions to this policy may be granted provided that the
following conditions are met:
1 . The proposed project must be water dependent or an essential
transportation, water conveyance or utility project.
2 . There must be no feasible , less environmentally damaging
alternative location for the type of project being con-
sidered.
3 . The public trust must not be adversely affected.
Page 3
4 . Adequate compensation for project-caused losses shall be a
part of the project. Compensation, to be considered ade-
quate, must meet the following criteria:
a. The compensation measures must be in writing in the
form of either conditions on a permit or an agreement
signed by the applicant and the Department of Fish and
Game or the Resources Agency.
b . The combined long-term ' wetlands habitat value' of the
lands involved (including project and mitigation lands)
must not be less after project completion than the
combined 'wetland habitat value ' that exists under
pre-project conditions . "
C. Corps of Engineers
The Army Corps of Engineers (COE) , under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act of 1972 , regulates development in wetlands .
Section 404 permits are required for any development that would
discharge dredged or fill material into any waters of the
United States, including wetlands .
The Corps of Engineers wetland policy guidelines state :
The purpose of a proposed structure or work will be examined
with a view toward avoiding siting in wetland areas . If that
purpose is not dependent on waterfront access, or can be satis-
fied by the use of an alternate site or by use of existing
public facilities, the application will ordinarily not be
granted. The applicant will be required to demonstrate that
a feasible alternate site does not exist; the inability to
finance or acquire an alternate site is not a factor in the
determination of feasibility.
Unless the public interest requires otherwise, no permit shall
be granted for work in wetlands identified as important . . .
unless the District Engineer concludes, on the basis of the
analysis required in . . . (the public review) . . . that the
benefits of the proposed alteration outweigh the damage to
the wetlands resource and the proposed alteration is necessary
to realize those benefits . (33 Code of Federal Regulations
209. 120) .
The guidelines mandate the denial of Section 404 permits unless
the applicant is able to demonstrate both of the following:
(1) that the activity associated with the fill must have direct
access or proximity to, or be located in the water resource in
order to fulfill its basic purpose or that other sites or con-
struction alternatives are not practical ; and (2) that the pro-
posed fill and the activity associated with it will not cause
a permanent unacceptable disruption to the beneficial water
Page 4
quality uses of the affected aquatic ecosystem (Section 230 . 5
b-8 of 33 Code of Federal Regulations) . *
D. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (U.S .F .W.S . ) , under
the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, the Estuary Protection Act, and other
Federal laws, reviews 404 permits before they are issued by the
Corps of Engineers . Although these permits are issued by the
COE, responsibility is shared with the U.S .F.W.S . and permits
must be consistent with guidelines issued by the U.S .F.W.S . ,
the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Coastal
Management Program.
The U.S.F.W.S . is authorized by federal Endangered Species legis-
lation to identify federally endangered species for purposes of
habitat protection.
In addition to development being subject to the regulations of
these federal agencies , an Environmental Impact Statement is
required for any action taken by a federal agency that would
have a significant impact on the environment, under Title I ,
Section 102 , of the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) .
Such a document would require coordination with the various
agencies having permit authority.
* Source: Wetlands Protection: The Regulatory Role of the U.S .
Army Corps of Engineers, 1978 Coastal Zone Management Journal Volume
4, Number 4.
AN ASSESSMENT OF WETLAND RESOURCES
WITHIN THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
BETWEEN BEACH BLVD. AND THE SANTA
ANA RIVER.
by
Bob Radovich
Department of Fish and Came
Region 5
Fred Worthley, Regional Manager
INTRODUCTION
This report was prepared at the request of the South Coast Regional Commission
staff. The Commission staff specifically requested that the Department of Fish
and Came map the wetlands between Beach Avenue and the Santa Ana River within
the Coastal Zone of the City of Huntington Beach. The Department was also
requested to provide an assessment of the biological value of the area in
question, and to provide recommendations for possible enhancement.
A brief evaluation and mapping of the area in question was prepared for the
State Coastal Commission in March of 1979. The present report is somewhat
more detailed and the mapping is considerably more precise.
The_ maps and accompanying text were prepared after review of pertinent literature,
_ield surveys, and careful examination of aerial photographs. In spite of the
considerable effort expended, and the attention to detail which was applied to the
map delineations, it must be kept in mind that habitat maps are somewhat subjective
in nature. Only rarely are divisions between plant communities rigid enough to
be delineated as a line on a map. The transition from one plant community to the
next is often quite subtle. The problems facing the field biologist/map delineator
are often like trying to establish the precise instant when day becomes night -
the change is certainly apparent but the instant is quite obscure.
The accompanying maps must, therefore, be viewed for what they are - a good
approximation of the various habitats available to wildlife in the area in
question.
DEFINITIONS
.he following definitions apply:
Environmentally Sensitive Area - "Any area in which plant or animal life or their habitats
are either rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an
2
ecosystem and which could be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities
a
and developments". (California Coastal Act, Section 30107. 5).
Wetland - "Land where the water table is at, near or above the land surface long
enough to promote the formation of hydric soils or to support the growth of
hydrophytes. In certain types of wetlands , vegetation is lacking and soils are
poorly developed or absent as a result of frequent and drastic fluctuations of
surface-water levels , wave action, water flow, turbidity or high concentrations
of salt or other substances in water or substrate. Such wetlands can be recognized
by the presence of surface water or saturated substrate at some time during each
year and their location within, or adjacent to, vegetated wetlands or deep-water
habitats."1
Coastal Salt Marsh - A wetland, as defined above, estuarine,2 of estuarine origin,
or exhibiting a water-regime and halinity which maintain vegetation characteristic of
an estuarine system. For the purposes of this report let the "Coastal Salt Marsh"
designation include areas which are at least 307.3 covered by salt marsh indicator
plant species listed in our November 7, 1979 letter to Eric Metz of the State Coastal
Commission (See attachment #1) . (These areas are shown in light green on the maps).
(E2EM1K3dhg)*
Coastal Salt Flat - A wetland, as defined above, where vegetation is lacking (<30%
.coverage 4) and soils are poorly developed or absent as a result of frequent and drastic
fluctuations of surface-water levels, wave action, water flow, turbidity or high con-
centrations of salt or other substances in water or substrate. (In the case of the
subject wetlands , salt in water and substrate, in combination with drastic fluctuations
*
in surface water levels, severely limits vegetation). (E2FL3K 1/3 dhg)
*USFWS Wetland classification system.
3
Riparian Area - Areas which support riparian plant species as listed in our November
7, 1979 letter. Riparian areas are wetlands by U.S.F.W.S. definition, and for the
purposes of this report shall be considered wetlands. Although the Coastal Act does
not specifically list riparian areas as wetlands, they are environmentally sensitive
by Coastal Act definition and have been protected as environmentally sensitive
habitat areas by action of Regional and State Coastal Commissions. (These areas are
shown in black on the accompanying maps). (U/O? SS 1/3 K), (Note: areas designated
riparian include some coastal strand vegetation, some upland vegetation, and some
saltmarsh vegetation (i.e. Juncus).)
Fresh/Brackish Water Marsh - A wetland, as defined above, which supports vegetation
characteristic of a fresh or brackish water marsh as listed in our November 7, 1979
letter. (These areas are shown in dark green on the accompanying maps). (PEMIM/0 hg)
Flood control channels - Estuarine areas contained within flood control dikes with
either permanent or semipermanent standing or flowing water (partially deep water
habitat). Dikes have also been included, dikes themselves are upland. (These areas
are shown in blue). ((E1/E2 FL3/UB(MUD) K2/3 t dh)/ U)
Restorable Areas - Wetlands which have been filled and/or cleared, and which may
be easily restored as Coastal Salt Marsh. (These areas are shown in red). (E2EM1K3dhg
(filled and/or cleared))
GENERAL
Historically, the subject area was part of the 2,950 acre Santa Ana River marsh which
existed in the 1890's5. This historic acreage was roughly 2.5 times larger than the
vacant wetland area of the Bolsa Chica gap of today. This once magnificent wetland
has been filled, and developed for residential, commercial, and industrial purposes
until today approximately 170 acres remain within the City of Huntington Beach.
The areas delineated as wetlands on the accompanying maps are wetlands by Coastal Act
* USFWS Wetland classification system
4
definition (except for riparian areas) , by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service definition,
and by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers definition. P'cklewueu (Saiicornia pacifica)
is the dominant salt marsh indicator species in the study area. Other salt marsh
indicator species include alkali heath Frankenia rg, andiflora) , saltgrass (Distichlis
spicata) and Juncus (Juncus acutus var. sphaerocarpus). Outcroppings of willows
Salix sp.) , tulea Scir us sp.) , and cattails (Typha sp.) occur in several areas
where haline conditions are sufficiently diluted to allow such growth. Several
characteristically upland/transition species such as coyote bush Baccharis sp.)
and holly-leafed cherry Prunus ilicifolia) grow near (among) willows forming dense
thickets with unquestionably high value to wildlife of the area.
The flood control channels support a great number of estuarine-related fish, molluscs , and
crustaceans. Pickleweed is the dominant plant species and grows in narrow strips near
the waters edge. For the most part these channels are either tidal mudflats or subtida'
unconsolidated bottom (mud).
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The average height of the subject area is less than 2 ft. MSL. Virtually the entire
wetland area would be subject to tidal flushing were it not for dikes along the
flood control channels. The entire wetland area is within the hundred year flood
zone, and would have standing water 9 feet deep during such a flood.6
Soils of the subject area are organic with high halinities. Groundwater of the subject
area is chemically similar to that of the ocean which indicates a hydraulic link
between the ocean and the subject wetlands.7 "Schmidt (1978) indicates that the
flood control channel and the ocean will exert diurnal and seasonal tidal pressure
on the groundwater, causing semi-ebb and flow motions , although not to the degree of
surface tidal movement."8 It seems that coastal salt marsh and coastal salt flat
areas are directly influenced by tidal action lahich causes variations in saturation
levels of the soil.
5
Standing water runs the full range between fresh (less than 0.5 parts/1000) and
hyperhaline (greater than 40 parts/1000) depending on location, time of year, recency
of rainfall, amount of rainfall, and it some instances the height of the tide. Stan-
ding water is generally circumneutral to alkaline (ph 5.5 or higher) .
The wetlands of the subject area have been diked, partially drained, and exhibit
an artificial water regime. They are at least seasonally flooded or saturated.
It is the combination of low elevation, high groundwater table, euhaline groundwater,
and precipitation which allows the growth of coastal salt marsh vegetation and the
maintenance of coastal salt flat areas.
Riparian areas and fresh/brackish water marshes are apparently the result of urban
runoff which dilutes halinities sufficiently for maintenance of these vegetative
associations.
There is evidence of recent vehicular activity in many wetland areas. Fill (with
the exception of the trailer park, power plant , oil storage areas, and boat sales
facility) is of a rather minor nature. Existing service roads are narrow and have
been largely ignored in map delineations.
NATURAL RESOURCE VALUES
The primary resource value of this coastal wetland area is it's function as habitat
for water-associated and marsh dependent bird species, both migratory and resident.9
Two endangered species (the California least tern Sterna albifrons browni) and
Belding's savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis beldinki)) use this area.
With minor modification this wetland complex could become valuable habitat for
marine fish and invertebrates.
6
SITE SPECIFIC DISCUSSION
For the sake of convenience, we have divided the Huntington Beach wetland area into
two subareas as follows:
Subarea I - That area bounded by the Santa Ana River, Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) ,
Magnolia Street and the Orange County flood control channel. (This sub-area is
shown on map 1).
Subarea II - All areas delineated on Map 2.
Subarea 1
For convenience this subarea can, in turn, be divided into 2 distinct sections.
Let section A be the area bounded by the Santa Ana River, PCH, Brookhurst Street ,
and the Orange County Flood control channel. Let section B be the area bounded
by Brookhurst Street, PCH, Magnolia Ave. and the OCFD Flood Control channel.
Section A - As mitigation for impacts to the California least tern from an Orange
County flood control dredging operation in the Santa Ana River, a tidal estuary
was created on this site. Orange County subsequently removed the culverts which
supplied tidal flushing to this area. The federal government filed suit over the
County's action.
This section is presently a wetland with manufactured tidal channels not subject
to tidal flushing. If tidal flow is reestablished, then the area will again be
estuarine in nature. Coastal salt marsh vegetation, though sparse, is present.
For the purposes of this document, we have mapped the area as Coastal Salt Marsh
without regard to more precise delineation.
Within six months after this area was exposed to tidal inundation, a large (and
suprisingly diverse) complement of fish and invertebrates had invaded the area.
The California least tern fed extensively on forage fish such as mosquito fish
7
Gambusia affinis) and top smelt (Atherinops affinis). Other fish collected from
the site were: staghorn sculpin (Leptocottus armatus) , long jaw mudsucker (Gillichthys
mirabilis) , yellowfin goby (Acanthogob:us flavimanus) , arrow goby Clevandia ios) ,
Kelp bass (Paralabrax clathratus) , California halibut (Paralichthys californicus) ,
Opaleye Girella nigricans) , and shiner perch (Cymatogaster aggregata). Invertebrates
included ghost shrimp (Callianassa californiensis) , jacknife cams (Tagus californianus) ,
little egg cockles (Laevicardium substriatum) , bay mussels M tilus edulis) , bent-nosed
clam Macoma nasuta) , common littleneck clam (Protothaca staminea), Striped share crab
(Pachygrapsus crassipes) and a crab of the genus Cancer. Additionally, this area was
a valuable feeding and resting site for shorebirds and waterfowl.
Our enhancement recommendations for section A would be to simply restore tidal action
by replacing the culverts which were removed.
It. should be pointed out that 'reestablishment of tidal flushing to other wetland
areas in Huntington Beach would be likely to result in rapid colonization by the
above mentioned species as well as others.
Section B - This area consists primarily of a pickleweed and Juncus dominated coastal
salt marsh. Riparian areas dominated by willows occur along PCH. A fresh/brackish,water
marsh exists at the intersection of Magnolia Street and PCH. The area shows evidence
of a historic tidal channel which has been delineated as coastal salt flat on the
accompanying map.
The area is quite valuable to the Belding's savannah sparrow, and is seasonally
important to shorebirds and waterfowl.
nur enhancement recommendations for section B would be to recreate tidal flushing
8
by the installation of culverts between the flood control channel and the subject
wetlands. Some channelization of the subject wetland prior to the establishment
of tidal flushing may be advisable. Extreme care would be necessary to avoid
adversely impacting the Belding's savannah sparrow. Because unconsolidated fill
along PCH supports rather dense vegetation of high value to wildlife, we recommend
that these areas be preserved. Similarly, the fresh/brackish water marsh contributes
to habitat diversity and should be maintained if such maintenance may be feasibly
included in an enhancement plan:
Subarea 2
This subarea may be divided into 3 sections as follows:
Let section A be that area bounded by Magnolia Street, PCH, the Edison Power plant
and related facilities , and the OCFCD flood control channel.
Let section B those wetlands randward (generally north) of the OCFCD flood control
channel as shown on map #2.
Let. section C be those wetlands delineated on map 2 not included in sections A or B.
Section A - This area consists primarily of a pickleweed dominated coastal salt
marsh covering roughly 60% of the site, and a coastal salt flat area covering
roughly 307. of the site. Additional habitat is afforded by outcroppings of willow
along PCH.
The Belding's savannah sparrow uses the coastal salt marsh and coastal salt flat
areas. The California least tern fed extensively on mosquito fish which were
introduced to the salt flat area after heavy winter rains of 1977-1978. 10 and 11
Our enhancement recommendations for this area would be to reestablish tidal flushing
9
by installation of culverts connecting the wetlands to the flood control channel .
Additionally the fill area (::Mown in red on the accompanying nap) should be removed,
and steps should be taken to eliminate vehicular access to this area.
Section B - This area consist; of two geographically distinct subsections:
The first subsection is immediately east of the "Light Industrial" designation
and is shown primarily in red on the accompanying map. This entire area is re-
storable by installation of culverts. During a field survey it was noted that
water from the flood control channel was inundating the small area shown as
coastal salt marsh (green) , and that a rather dense mat of pickleweed was present
(again only in that portion of the site designated as coastal salt marsh). How the
water passes through the dike is unknown as of this writing.
Review of pertinent literature reveals that at least as recently as 1971 this
ntire area (red and green) was coastal salt marsh as was the area immediately to
the west presently occupied by the office complex ("Light Industrial"). The area
designated restorable (red) has been heavily impacted, but the presence of sparsely
arrayed pickleweed throughout the site indicates historical conditions. Restoration
of this site should receive the lowest priority of any area discussed in this report.
The second subsection is directly across Newland Street from the office complex men-
tioned above. This area consists primarily of pickleweed dominated coastal salt marsh,
two areas of unconsolidated fill, and a coastal salt flat area.
The coastal salt marsh areais important to the Belding's savannah sparrow. The
coastal salt flat area receives heavy use by waterfowl and shorebirds following
heavy rains. Presumably salt fly larvae, and scuds supply a valuable seasonal food
-nurce.
The unconsolidated fill areas paX be ecologically important. They certainly contribute
to plant diversity and may be used by the Belding's savannah sparrow as a resting site
10
when heavy rains innundate rmich of the coastal salt flat and salt marsh habitat.
Their importance must be ev:lluated before recoi,Qnen,lations for their removal can
be made. If it is determined that they should be removed, then it would be a
very simple task to change these areas to coastal saltmarsh, saltflat, or open
water habitat.
Enhancement recommendations for this area would include the establishing of tidal
action by placing culverts between the flood control channel and the subject
wetlands.
Section C - This area consists of unconsolidated fill (red) near the shopping
center, pickleweed dominated coastal salt marsh, coastal salt flat, a small channel
with permanent standing water, and a small fresh/brackish water marsh.
The coastal salt marsh and coastal salt flat areas have essentially the same
values for the same species as" those previously mentioned for these habitat types.
The tidal channel is used by waterfowl and shorebirds as a feeding and resting area.
The fresh/brackish water marsh contributes to habitat diversity and should be maintained,
if such maintenance can be feasibly interwoven into the primary enhancement effort
(i.e. restoration of tidal flushing) .
The unconsolidated fill near the shopping center is restorable and should be restored
as coastal salt marsh. Removal of fill might be feasibly accomplished by designating
this area as a borrow site for fill material. The existence of pickleweed growing
sparsely on this fill area, and the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development (DNOD)
map (see attachments) indicate that this area was a viable salt marsh at least as recent-
ly as 1971.
There is an irregularly shaped area of low lying unconsolidated fill near the boat
sales facility. Saltmarsh vegetation in this area seems to gradually blend with a
11
community made up of ruderal vegetation which characteristically colonizes recently
disturbed areas. Pickleweed may be found growing as individual plants (rather than
mats of many individuals) right up to the boat sales area. Precisely what is occuring
in this area from a ecological standpoint is difficult to determine. It may be that
saltmarsh vegetation is gradually supplanting the ruderal community, it may be that
the opposite .is occuring, or it maybe that the area is relatively static. Because
of the gradual nature of the transition, and because of the existence of coastal
. salt marsh indicator species throughout the site, we have delineated the area as
coastal salt marsh. Coastal salt marsh values might be considerably enhanced by
lowering this area somewhat.
Enhancement recommendations for section C would include placement of culverts and
reestablishment of tidal flushing.
V THE R CONSIDERATIONS
Endangered :i ep cies - Of paramount concern within the subject wetlands is the retention
or improvement of habitat values for the Belding's savannah sparrow and California
least tern. These species should be the focal point around which restoration
efforts revolve.
Flood Control Channels - These channels are tidally influenced throughout the study
area. Aside from the fact that they provide a readily availatle source of water for
enhancement of the subject wetlands, these channels are a valuable habitat in their
own right. A11 fish and invertebrates mentioned above in the discussion of subarea
1, section A are to be found in the flood control channels. These channels are used
as foraging areas by the California least tern, as well as numerous other bird species.
he levee embankments which adjoin wetland areas constitute most of the remaining
12
non-developed upland in the study area. If these levee embankments were planted
with appropriate native plant species , the effect would 1C l.y ':a profoundly
beneficial to the subject wetlands in terms of wildlife diversity.
Trailer Park - The area covered by the trailer park (including narrow vacant strips
along Newland Street and PCH) is restorable as wetland. The Department does not
advocate immediate removal of the present land use. However, if this use is phased
out , we favor marsh restoration over any other land use. The feasibility of a "phase-
out" of the trailer park use, similar to that which was at one time considered for
the Irvine Coastal Area, should be explored.
Fuel Storage Areas - These areas are restorable as wetlands given a phase-out
of the existing land use.
Flood Risk - Flood risk must be taken into account prior to opening some of the
discussed areas to tidal flushing.
Mosquitos - Mosquito production would be likely to decrease if these wetlands
were open to tidal flushing.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The subject wetlands constitute a valuable resource of greater than local
importance. The Department recommends that the wetlands in question be preserved
and enhanced as wildlife habitat. Measures necessary to insure this objective should
be incorporated into the Local Coastal Program for the City of Huntington Beach.
HYDROPUYTIC PLANTS - COASTAL IIABITATS
Our November 7, 1979 letter to Eric Metz of the California Coastal Commission
listed the following indicator species. An X indicates that the species is
known to occur in the subject wetlands.
Salt Marsh
X Pickleweed (Salicornia Pacifica)
X Glasswort (Is. subterminalis)
X Saltgrass (Distichilis spicata)
Cordgrass S artina foliosa)
X Jaumea Jaumea carnosa)
X Alkali heath (Frankenia raniflora)
Salt cedar (Monanthochloe littoralis)
Arrow grass Tri lochin maritima)
X Sea-blite Suaeda californica var. pubescens)
X Marsh rosemary Limonium californicum var. mexicanum)
Gum plant (Grindel.ia stricta)
Salt marsh flebane Pluchea purpurescens)
X Juncus Juncus acutus var. sphaerocarpus)
Freshwater Marsh
X Cattails (Typha spp.)
X Bulrushes Scir us spp.)
Ledges Carex spp.)
Rushes Juncus spp.)
Spikerush (Heleochoris palustris)
Pondweeds (Potamogeton spp. )
Smartweeds (Polygonum spp.)
Water lilies (Nuphar spp. )
Buttercup Ranuculus aquatilus)
Water-cress (Nasturtium officinale)
Bur-reed (Sparganium eurycarpum)
Water parsley Venanthe sarmentosa)
Naiads Na as spp.)
Brackish Marsh
Alkali bulrush Scir us robustua)
Rush Juncus balticus)
Brass buttons Cotula coronopifolia)
X Fat-hen Atri lex ap tula)
X Olney's bulrush Scir us olneyi)
X Common tule Scir us acutus)
Common reed (Phragmites communis)
Riparian
A willows Salix spp.)
Cottonwoods (Po ulus spp. )
Red alder Alnus rubra)
Box elder Aur negundo)
Sycamore Platanus recemosa)
Blackberry Rubus vitifolia)
Horsetail (Equisetum spp. )
So. Black walnut (Jugulans cal_ifornica) ,
California bay (Umbelularia californicum)
Current Ribes spp.)
BIRDS OF THE HUNTIN�TON BEACH WETLANDS
These bird species are known to occur in the subject wetland area. The
following list is not intended to be exhaustive. The list is based on actual
field observation by the author.
Wading birds: Ardeidae
Great blue heron Ardea herodias
Common egret Casmerodius albus
Snowy egret Leucophoyx thula
Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis
Black-crowned night heron Nycticorax nyct.icorax
Surface ducks
Mallard Anas platyrhynchos
Pintail Anas acute
Common teal Anas crecca
Green-winged teal Anas carolinensis
Blue-winged teal Anas discors
Cinnamon teal Anas cyanoptera
American widgeon Mareca americans
Shoveller Spatula clypeata
Diving ducks
Lesser scaup Aythya affinis
Surf scoter Melanitta perspicillata
Stiff-tailed ducks
Ruddy duck Qxyura jamaicen: is
Rites, hawks , falcons (observed foraging in wetland areas)
White-tailed kite Elanus leucurus
Red-tailed hawk Buteo iamaicensis
Marsh hawk Circus cyaneus
Sparrow hawk Falco sparverius
Shorebirds '
Semipalmated plover Charadrius semipalmatus
Killdeer Charadrius vociferus
Black bellied plover Squatarola squatarola
Long billed curlew Numenius americanus
Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus
Willet Catoptrophorus semipalmatus
Greater yellowlegs Totanus melanoleucus
Least sandpiper Erolia minutilla
Dunlin Erolia alpina
Western sandpiper Ereunetes mauri
Marbled godwit Limosa fedoa
American avocet Recurvirostra americans
Black-necked stilt Himantopus mexicanus
Northern phalarope Lobipes lobatus
Gulls and terns
Western gull Larus occidentalis
Herring gull Larus argentatus
California gull Larus californicus
Ring-billed gull Larus delawarensis
Bonaparte's gull Larus Philadelphia
Heerman's gull Larus heermanni
Forster's tern Sterna forsteri
California least tern Sterna albifrons browni
Caspian tern Hydroprogne caspia
Miscellaneous wetland-related species
American coot Fulica americans
Belding's savannah sparrow Passerculus sandwichensis beldingii
Red-winged blackbird AAelaius phoeniceus
Miscellaneous species not directly related- to wetland habitat
Mourning dove Zenaidura macroura
Common crow Corvus brachyrhynrhos
Mockingbird Mimus polyglottus
Starling Sturnus vulgaris
English sparrow Passer domesticus
Western meadowlark Sturnella neglecta
House finch Carpodacus mexicanus
American goldfinch Spinus tristis
Lesser goldfinch S inus psaltria
Song sparrow Melospiza melodia
REFERENCES CITED
1. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, "Classification of Wetlands and Deep-water
Habitats of the United States (An Operational Draft)", October 1977, pages 4-5.
2. USFWS , page 14.
3. USFWS, page 35-37.
4. USFWS, page 35-37.
5. Speth, J.W. et.al. 1976, The Natural Resources of Anaheim Bay"; Calif. Dept.
of Fish and Game, Coastal Wetland Series No. 18
6. Final EIR 77-9, General Plan Amendment 78-1, page 31.
7. Final EIR 77-9, page 31.
8. Final EIR 77-9, pages 32-33.
9. Mansfield, T.M. , et. al. 1979, "Evaluation of Wetlands and Natural Resources
Values Adjacent to the Southern California Edison Plant, Huntington Beach,
California."
10. Massey, B.W. 1978. "Proposed mitigation for loss of California least
tern feeding habitat during construction of flood control improvements
on the Santa Ana River." Orange County Env. Mgt. Agency. 8p.
'I. Kelly, P.R. 1979. Assistant Wildlife Biologist, Calif. Dept. of Fish
and Game, Endangered Species Program, personal communication.
12. California Dept, of Navigation and Ocean Development, "Comprehensive Ocean
Area Plan, Land Use-Coastal"; Sheet Number 99 of 127, August 1971.
or
AP I From: -'alifornia Department
" of Navigation and ocean
Development, "Comprehensive ;
l r - -,' �•t. ;ocean l+xea. Plan, Land Use -
_ Coastal"; 'Sheet Number 99'
of 127, August 1971, -
• j t. ,.
WO R. t% 111111
k
S:Cr Rid COt:i•,.�t'E!
Ce �• ''
Ce i CC
I ce _
I m RI E ND' ,
Rt Crrim
� ..
Y
r• Th
•'^ •� N9 • ce
Nm Id r. E
�• •L Gt We •Nm CO
Gs
No
� t '•� % • •,•' '� :. . � ND Red ` /•.
4
`• ti• ,�• a ..�. ► t �.: . y _' .,• Red
of
of
. '-�,��:': :; ,•,.�• .:�•. •.., •,•�t'J .. '.a1 _ `' 1.
o.
-i^1 ':: •� , .�, 1. •. \
•'—'�' ...may_.-^�,,,, � .'...��,•^•t. :.i:,.. : �I.. C'. r .. • .� ` 7
Legend (taken from document) - fir' 'T ''�. . •'' �' ` ' '"
"N m" = "Salt-water marsh" , `r'"`'—�--••••�-�.:.1 r
"Nb" = "Natural Barren"
"Rt" _ "Residential (trailer)" Note: This map indicates that the
"Rsd" = "Residential (>4. du's/acre)" subj&t wetlands have been
"Idly,
f, ff „ = formally classified as wetlands
Id Its It "Industrial" ' by the State of California at :
"We" _ "Estuary" least since August 1971•
"CA" , "Cr" = "Commercial"
�vN Sn�-tt, -Aa
RESIDEYTIAL po _
c
M
SEWAGE FALILRY
RESIDENTIAL
. ;Zia
ra _
�F4C �li CGAST
BEACH
MAP L
_"_raw"„�.�s.�,.+►+.i�Yrr.�w.�sn�.e,_ - -�- -' - -
c?c�, RESIDENTIAL ` RESIDENTIAL RESIDEUTIA.
RESIDENTIIAL RESIDENTIAL
SEE MAP 2
",roc--r--� t ..,, t � .. .. .. _ 1 •..
kA
_.___..- . � I c i "tom f://• rY IL a � ."_
- _ter • -_ 1 _f._ � _ - ,
� S tip' '•�:; _ . .
( 1C CCAST 4:GH`w'4Y
BEACH
RESIDENTIAL CD
Zi
C •
SEWAGE FA41L ITY
RESIDENTIAL
14
FALiJi. CGgST-
N;GN'w'AY 1.
17
N �\
BEACH
0
�l
C'
MAP L
REST^arIAL
OIL SUMP
`'1 RESIDENTIAL
LT. INDUSMN-
FUEL STOUG 6
j" 9r RESIDETi';h
POWER PLANT s'1�
:R PARK
s
BCACH
0 1000
SCALE IN FEET
MAP 2
rN
RESIDENTIAL
REST GENnkL 6ARAEK
LT. INDUSTRIRI.
RIEL SMPAOE
( 1
r
TRAILER PART(
• rPE,I �4�p�
BOAT SALES
HIGN`a;lY _..._
BEACH
�EGELD
I
ICOASTAL 3AL',I'1dRSH ' RIPARIAN AREA
COASTAL SALTFUT STANNIC WATER AND
A FLOG& CONTROL DIKES
RESTCRA9LE A4lEA1 VI!!LH 4iRvE
yl) F, S�:,6>uCKSM Va E!l MAgSN Li 5' rN FILLED AND/CR CLEARED. � t
!i\l ACc6APAU41%6 TIM
SCALE IN FEET