Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
File 5 of 5 - Pierside Pavillion Reconstruction - 300 Pacifi
Exhibit T PIER - H uim 'T' ING . TON C 0 L 0 N Y H U N T I N C T a N BEACH C A L I ' F O R N I A c OMER ; ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CALIFORNIA RESORTS TOGAWA & SMITH ARCHITECTS PLANNERS L.AWRENCE REED MOLINE. LTC). 305 Walnut Avenue. Huntington Veacn, Coliforn;a 92648 2914 Main Strcet, Santa Monica. California 90405 5807 Uptander Way. Culver City. California 90230 �p 1 � .7 ._1-•a.s. L1��� .�/y .��'�. .�'i . Ma1 M1taW �..�4� Yam" 'SST%" I•' �r-!1 f— -� Y ? ,.n/•�.� i i•erc.w.•mr.r,a �. � I ``{ jl � • � '�m '%�+ ! m„r,,.. s a wA wa+ �y,syi 1 f ' • a / t .r[.a tea,I t -m.a.aa.rm. .�• 1 �L/ a ��C r ✓• t �'� Y t 77 va •II'is 7 fix!: �'!�ll'h! I f'r .e�.�{'�YL�]t tl.'u+ ft w'•':W s{.,r„•.y yj�'.�+�, �:7�1', 6�.•.`� {� �1 - �r�1M;+•�� C:ww lw !'JI+ �'#a J'1.'�• s ma e +.M; '• ', 1 T'K�i.,'y['.' T�r" ,� , I111��, d:`4hWt;•I rLhK }: �C:i•: a}ra.4� I.�:.qp p.l'7 ^'•, i[it;a -;�c_..o�..m aim�� `� .,� lsr ._1r�.�,�: '!�II,_� '� •V �` 'i,/r-l+•.. C�!g:C:.rj{p il. �/. r m\.9 "+, .� � �f ! •y:m e_ea.Yiilf..-•,1 1 . f �� �I I� 1� � I'J...ILJ�y '��"�1'OS ,�, leis �'h �e L-_� .S / A " �_..'.•-��`°°'a'e��r. R.W. [i...1. y� +� ,,,V�YI•aT�jR�Y • •±I'.\y•.*. YYIbW+1� 11wNk _. 1 ) •.. •tr _ � �. 1f::i:a�f9A/• e' v .'"r ..qy n rE �+ium�}''Cr k ,4 Q$ Kwy�i� Jay 7}� a�J r' y �.�+:.•,p ��/�/� i�r CI_.Cl. - r�"�'�1 U GY �yy��f�_ i��`..-�+•=s— ram• /^°'i\ $$w'�'L:a,.ilf."�^� f•+� o. � __ .Gl.. � .t� S� l y. U!Mre m9ln.pµlh" rsn t` ear M•r11 h•MY•. 1 w p - /y g� .1c�l:isi� M •'�! f w"�I. .11_Q'I � ' w0.I°t �° Z 'i'.Illtl.JiN::•'�. �.^'T•^ �! � r,St.f'�s��r'�.'� •` �������mWI •'d�Oi+YJtim ��.� a •I �_"tiC��.,, � e�Etlo••(m.is w+;iu w�i e,�[a��i�>�*�,�i:�. ti[+'�a.1:�333�'� 'N,1 Fi P, . l 1'.r ..-1 traaa Y!h. Er+! wa a+t ►+IL.. Rd 1 bRy, 11 ,.ae l ,L ri r E"1(t 1rfr1f r- .��m� )1(� p �}11 `J may.• ili}� '+J- �j J._'1•9`' �[F S^ i� ll::','-n. Y-,:$! ��LJ� •` + L�-�4N�. ,�+.r�-�.. .....�._•a:n._@!"��i w..wa.a�,v.(,Pltkwr�id',a i.a rF i:ir,:c.� w..il�a.-,•,.. .+.ir..:. .�...,.,. '7f ��"''•. a.ua aW.:N A41N®Wu1MW! •a'f*r�'•'a'•"tnrl+n•"r ����,...mmm--•rrr��� -r"-•_;F.:.. .r S':•[! :9 u•a. np s.r' �. Y I _� _�. 1 2�� �x �y'' `' �I'..r°!:>.a.o . +F.,`':;"�;:tisAx�•`;:µ�i:-� • .._.1L_Jl_...I .1 �.. - .,y,Y , _ter ...wa+m.•m.0 � ® IAGe[C G(lAfl r.wr i=T1ab,/13r.4i�;tY,.�'•` /S..•+m'M .++.w.r,t y.1t6:' .!r® •r•.'fr /r.. HUNT6NGTON ® PIER• ° .COLO lY SITE PLAN ` CHTE R T AINMENT CENTER CALIFORNIA RESORTS SOS wainul Arenae, Huntington BeaCh, Colllarnlo 97644 A� \use!! T(7GAWA & SMITH ARCHITECTS PLANNERS F p� 2914 learn Slreel, $onto Ilonjea• California 90405 -W t 1rr, OM e. era®+wa 0 e� •wnaw a.m msNy� Ns1 �Y � ,• '�� b0 �,.• •.mie .w.. 6.�••f 6 .asp.. r� m.w y �('°'1� �,"11 a ppp B ,y/•^ l•Z"aaao SECOND FLOOR VVRO FLOOR H U N T I N G T 0 N PIERoC0L0NY PLANS 1E N T1: R T A t N 04 E N T C E N T C R 80 Iq' cAurOR A RESORTS 30 WW wt aa.H„e. ►unlingtor 9each, toNi®elo 92649 �¢4 T00AWA &f SMITH ARCHITLEcTS PLANNERS as+a main sweat. softie ugnka ccodalW4 99405 -1 i _4 d.rw s• I . ME WFM I If 1-1-1111 I � ..—rwr wa.0e•w �� � �- 1f � .�{ I II ,.,,w"".I 0w79a 111,1114 awtEnfAo"Ur CEIVrta PAM&G rail".0 ia+.t a"w" 153 DIM" 1.4 5,415 HUNTINGT0N • PIER ° C0L0NY GARAGE PLANS ENTERTAINMENT CENTER dt` 76, CALIFORNIA RESORTS �ICi p[� a 903 Walnut Alenua• Huntington Baoefi, California92548 f �•T4 TOGAWA 6r SMITH ARCHITECTS PLANNERS , ~+ 2914 mom Sheol, Santa Monica. California 20405 o w 1 w ara r a ar wsLJ7 Avr am" Job jil . � ii l • I jl : Laj , 'L�..+ y� :iT � slB • IdI lie I • f 4. i : P l � .� A°r- �$� .� •��ode' A ! � ��, 'fV�Y � __ I I I_( I I iA � I ! 1 � ! .• �� • � — � �� ! � �,Itr„e� e f � f L,. _ , �{ i.S � � a � i � a � Fib """".''° S � l � � � � �: � ; rj •t� 1�X� PM . �i �-Lii•. :� . ".i I�111li { 1 !•� lili � lii � ,� .; I � { � ' ° + ; 11 I ' : � II ! ". •9 • 1 �•S •`A"°\„3 ' . Fri ++ ] I Z I ( i 1 •` ' 1 1 i i i l i l + y i ` , i t :• ' " ' `�'� :� + If � � . � � . ,�_. ..�;... "`"'1 �� l � ��j! lil � l11i4 � lI� �' �'��. ,.�., ��� iii I111 ;,. :. � � � °•-_ ' B I � ._--. a s--ems ��: 1 ± I d � 1 � 1 I i l l � j• .o. I ,} .:r� •�+'� ) � �• _,. ....... ' ` _ _� • M 4•.eL,µf.•h" fP' 1 9h:+ ti 9r4•,W •, f•�W'•'I N• 1 °• Le''•....y Lep194 PA••LP•4 CD+faOA1 PAMAPMi LYALn LEtlLI tPANq PP6 LLLwLW IEHL f9.9IALAP too PIALL4 Ip Pl Ally H U N T I N G T 0 N PIER C0L. 0NY GARAGE PLANS 2• CALIFORNIA RESORTS 3015 9Ywnut A+eawa. M.ntmpton bench. caworn14 9264e pe. TOCAWA & SMITH ARCHITECT'S PLANNERS 2914 exam Su00%. $onto MomC0• C01.ewn-6 9040'. ,w+ •x r t L 1 I N NUNTINGT0N ° PIER ° COLONY SECTION �f3 ip CALIFORNIA RESORTS 305 Wc9nut Avenue. Huntington Beach, CoNlornto 92640 TOCAWA &e SMITH ARCHITECTS PLANNERS a 2914 Main Street. Santo Monica, Calttornla 90405 PAnO 1 i 1 � 1 .i KDA00H UmvG rr-r �. II eEW00i i i 1 ^r P�WO ( p Par v` a9aW 2 BEDROOM FLAT `tee 070 w.". PAM _.. DW ewWml i th" 1 0 i a nr i' ...... .. .... i Kee" i i i ax+fP IEKt UPPEW IENI 1BEDROOM FLAT 1 BEDROOM TOWNHOUSE .e in wry. H U N T I N G T 0 N ° P I E R C O L O N Y CONDOMINIUM UNITS P CALIFORNIA RESORTS 305 Walnut Avenue. Huntington Beach, California 92648 TOGAWA & SMITH ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2914 Alain Street, Santo Monica, California 90405 1 ' f asoeoor I i '�, W1paM ! i M 1 W 1 _ UP 1 1 1 mMwa WIQ4M 1 larl U L '""'--- _ 1 OPEN la suftoom WOO UAW WV4 i 1` i 1 PAIIO 1 BM.CaNr 1 ------------ 2 BEDROOM TOWNHOUSE 1 BEDROOM LOFT m?wit an awl. HUN TIN GTONePIER - COLON Y CONDOMINIUM UNITS P CALIFORNIA RESORTS �0 305 Walnut Avenue, Hunlingion Beach, California 926413 TOGAWA 8c SMITH ARCHITECTS PLANNERS l 1Y 2914 Main Street. Santa Monica, California 90405 i I 4L �.,t�"L?,•tr. �,�. _A__: � .T o j s or'1,++._1 In� �i.l}..tl 1'4h a 'r «� 1� � A 1 1 as I r .! 1 �1 �0 •�' @ �^r� I �, ,'�L� TI H U N T I N G T 0 N P I E R • C 0 L 0 E M T TC R T A , N U E M T C E NI T C R •►.� CALWORPSIA hESORTS �♦ �� i W5 mm�l A.~ A..tr..am Cloaca.CON40.4 YTS-• TOGAWA Or SUITM AMCMITECTS PLAMI4ERS /. Sw.°a lB.�nKO•im,lorna WaUS 1 a 1�1 1 �l (y limp it i eel' ► I ,Z Alt H U N T I N G T 0 N P I E R C 0 L. 0 N Y E N T E R T A I N h1 E N T C E N T E R i ' CALIFORNIA RESORTS 30 Wdnof Arenua. Nanlinglan B•och,Cdiianta 92645 TOGAWA Bc SMITH ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, 2914 Man Straat. Same Monica.Calfwnm 90405 } Z �t ffj Vd H3 Hi1e,, i _- IL NjQ. 1 - -•-- A � w •f '.. ��l�O"\a �'�'�Y � � � ,tl M 14 0%4MQ' / �,!•;���—��...w� ^ � �'aR. �' ^^+� {aft�� 1=a'4•_ • �.,n H U N T I N G T 0 N - P i E R • C 0 L 0 N Y CALIPIORP41A RESORTS 709VlW—Al MWIjnqjaa ,CO-. 92648 T00 4WA @ SMITH ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2914 Mom Sbeal,S�IA m-wgO Cadjwn 90405 MuwttwCtdw•P Ito-00 tow r FaGN'1C C0A3' t+iW+wny SIr:C75CaP[ .*—T"°":`-Lz j �.rola.'.:Y:arP :1.� ( 1 .,r eE ! w.......• x 41 4w !� m0 I I 9rS !�c+f I •sR► 1 kw%1 No re0 3.0 - �•L7'!.?tv9'xT J. ,... WK' veo ...1,too n;f- C'� '+. I � I Il �,�-•-, alit srm .-el" 1*,• I di 4 to ter .Pt ♦is 1 i ;aL',T rt+ry T7 !" _ ti`, .✓' 1 s 6at•� :�•s�• AYM Me ials !at0 w 4At: Arr ".:v -%• 1 -^ MK I MST.v'+S/R alr -rn- L.iz >'s I arw A.A..., �+ a t . � _x tiw srI x. saeG lit _ b rr I.wO• r:� }P" a1•L r $As .;:'144r�'}!•J �11u 1.'!IiM►•a_.1 rA - r�•�b:ti+ , = q "` I ,.x9C+ 4 66 .0.ro=A•=.�:7. .r. �i -' '�•I 77W I 02+ 1 IItC + @...6-. 11Ja 1�^^4 �1 •� I � i �29[; y'*j"J 1 OSD 1 � ! a7i Aa HUNTINGTON • PIERaCOLONY SITE COVERAGE PLAN ENTER TAINMEN T C E N T E R o ♦• CALIFORNIA RESORTS 305 aosn„t e.onw, ""Mmoton ®eoch• CW,flwn,o 92645 1f TOGAWA & SMITH ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 1 ,� 2914 49aA Street. Sort° Jaonaa. Ccd`torn,o 90405 t 17 4 � I: ' W k it l i l y Y ` Q. ( b� --L J— Ad ile.1 H U N T I N G T 0 N P I E R C 0 0 N y r N T E R Y A I tJ M E I'l T CENTER DIMENSION PLAN sc CALIFORNIA RESORTS 305 VocKut Avenue. muntm9lon boacti. Colikoruo %?Gas TOCAWA & SMITH ARCHITECTS PLANNERS to, 2914 M6on Stteel. %orkto MonlCo. Cablorn.0 90405 Ir%,.-Xr� joct ATTACH ENT NO. 1 FINAL FINDINGS AND COVDMONS OF APPROVAL Huntington Beach Planning Commission P.C. BOX 190 CALIFORNIA 92548 April 19, 1988 California Resorts/ City of Huntington Beach Redevelopment Agency SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13478 REQUEST: To develop a mixed use project with a 90,000 square foot entertainment complex, including retail, office and a 6-plex movie theater in addition to a 160 unit condominium project. LOCATION: The area approximately bcunded by Pacific Coast Highway, Main Street, Walnut Avenue and Second Street DATE OF APPROVAL: April 5, 1983 FIVDINGS FOR APPROVAL - CONDIXIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 88-7: 1. The proposed mixed use project with an entertainment/commercial center (a maximum 1,750 seat theater; 23,575 square feet of commercial; 15,925 square feet of office space; 10,000 square foot restaurant with 3,500 square foot outdoor deck area; and a maximum 3,000 square foot night club) and 130 condominium units will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the value of the property and improvements in the vicinity. All required parking for the proposed project will be provided on-site for the residential portion with a minimum of 300 spaces on-site for commercial. The remainder (approximately 675 spaces) will be provided within a parking facility adjacent to the proposed site. 2. The proposed mixed use project with entertainment/commercial center and 130 condominium units is designed to be compatible with existing and proposed uses in the vicinity. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13478 Page Two 3 . The location, site layout and design of the proposed mixed use project with entertainment/commercial center and 130 unit condominium project is properly related to the streets, drives and other structures and uses in the vicinity in a harmonious manner, 4 . The architecture and design of the proposed mixed use project is in conformance with the adopted Design Guidelines for the Downtown Specific Plan. 5. The general appearance including architectural features of the proposed mixed use project shall enhance the orderly and harmonious development of the Downtown Specific Plan. 6. The proposed mixed use project with entertainment/commercial center and 130 condominium units is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. F111DINCS_FOR_APPROVAL_- SPECIAL PEfiPJITS: 1. The following special permits for deviations to the requirements of the Downtown Specific Plan promote a better living environment and provide maximum use of the land in terms of site layout and design; exceeding the required amount of common open space. a. Setbacks of 10 feet in lieu of 15 feet along Pacific Coast Highway and Walnut for encroachment of a colonade. b. A reduction in the required alley width from 30 feet to 27 feet and a redaction in the main accessway width from the required 28 feet to 27 feet. c. An increase in site coverage to create a better project profile and to help reduce the potential conflict of adjacent residential and commercial uses is necessary. Residential will have a maximum site coverage of 59 percent and commercial a maximum of 60 percent. At the request of the Planning Commission the residential site coverage was increased from 50 percent to a maximum of 59 percent. 2. The approval of the special permits for encroachment in setbacks, accessway widths and increase in site coverage will not be detrimental to the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of - the neighborhood in general, nor detrimental or injurious to the value of property or improvements of the neighborhood. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13478 Page Three 3. The special permit requests for encroachment in setbacks, aecessway widths and increase in site coverage are consistent with the objectives of the Downtown Specific Plan in achieving a development adapted to the parcel and compatible with the surrounding environment. 4. The special permits for encroachment in setbacks, accessway widths and increase in site coverage are consistent with the policies of the Coastal Element of the City's General Plan and the California Coastal Act. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL-- TENTATIVE TRACT lam: 1. The proposed two lot subdivision for condominium and commercial purposes of the 170,912 net square foot parcel of land zoned Downtown Specific Plan-District 3, is proposed to be constructed having 130 residential condominium units and 90,000 square feet of commercial and retail. 2. The property was previously studied for a greater intensity of land use at the time the land use designation and Downtown Specific Plan-District 3 zoning designation were placed on the subject property. 3. The Huntington Beach General Plan is designed with provisions for the type of land use proposed, mixed use with entertainment/commercial center and residential, as well as setting forth provisions for the implementation of the proposed project. 4. The site is relatively flat and physically suitable for the proposed density and type of development. 5. Tentative Tract 13478 is consistent with the goals and policies of the Huntington Beach General Plan. FINDINGS FOR APPPROVAL - COASTAL -DEV �CPP2EP2E�1 T?FRR��3' NO. 88-3 1. The proposed mixed use project with entertainment/commercial center and 130 residential condominium units conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards of the Huntington Beach Coastal Element. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88®3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13478 Page Four 2. Coastal Development Permit No. 88-3 is consistent with the CZ suffix and the Downtown Specific Plan as well as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the project. 3. The proposed mixed use project with entertainment/commercial center and 130 condominium units shall be provided with infrastructure in a manner that is consistent with the Huntington Beach Coastal Element and Land Use Plan of the General Plan. 4 . The proposed mixed use project with entertainment/commercial center and 130 condominium units conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. 5. The Mellow Hill Affordable Housing requirements, Government Code Section 65590(d) , are satisfied in the following manner: a. The City has provided density bonuses within three miles of the coastal zone which have provided affordable housing. b. Due to the location and economics involved it would not be feasible to develop affordable housing on this site. The value of the land coupled with the need to provide subterranean parking on site would prohibit the ability to provide for affordable housing. IDITTONS OF APPROVAL - CONDO IONAL USE PERMIT NO, 88-7: 1. The site plan, floor plan and elevations received and dated March 25, 1988, shall be the conceptually approved layout with the modifications described herein: a. Number of units shall be reduced from 160 to 130 in order to create a greater separation of the residential from the commercial portions of the project; provide an increase in the average unit size; provide for a better overall building profile; and to provide greater view opportunities. b. The finished floor of the first level units and adjacent common open space areas of the residential portion of the project shall be elevated to a maximum of 8 feet above existing grade for the creation of a greater physical separation of the residential from the commercial portions of the project. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13478 Page Five c. The residential building elevations adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway and Second Street shall be modified to show a greater degree of upper story setback or other building wall movement, subject to review by the Design Review Board. d. The vallet/passenger drop off area adjacent to Walnut Avenue shall be modified to reduce the potential conflict of pedestrians and vehicles entering the project, subject to review by the Planning Commission. e. The residential project shall include the following sound mitigation features: (1) Double glassing on all exterior perimeter windows (2) Intensified landscape materials with water feature (3) Vertical separation from pedestrian accessway f. All private open space shall comply with the minimum dimension and square feet requirements of the Downtown Specific Plan. g. Parking layout shall show minimum 25 foot aisleways with all spaces dimensioned at 8-1/2 feet by 18 feet except those adjacent to a wall over 42 inches in height which shall be 12 feet in width. h. Depict all utility apparatus, such as but not limited to backflow devices and Edison transformers, on the site plan. They shall be prohibited in the front and exterior yard setbacks unless properly screened by landscaping or other method approved by the Community Development Director. i. Depict commercial electrical vault in a location that presents the least public hazard subject to review and approval by the Fire Department, Public Works Department and Community Development Department. J . Adequate trash enclosures shall be provided with a method of trash pick up subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and Community Development Department. k. The three security gates in the residential parking structure shall be located so no dead-end driveways are created for guest parking. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13478 Page Sig 1. Circulation in the entertainment center parking structure shall provide a continuous flow on the first level down to the second level subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and Department of Community Development. m. Site coverage shall not exceed 59 percent for residential and 60 percent for commercial. n. Parking layout shall be modified to add an additional 155 spaces on-site. If it is not feasible to incorporate the total additional spaces on-site, the shortfall must be made up in the off-site adjacent parking structure as identified in Condition No. 5. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following shall be completed: a. Street improvements as determined necessary by the Fire Department. b. Water mains and fire hydrants shall be installed and operating. c. All existing or abandoned oil well sites must be abandoned pursuant to Department of Gas and Oil and Fire Department standards. d. A circulation and parking management plan by a traffic engineer addressing valet parking, ingress and egress to the site, the allocation and assignment of parking spaces for residential tenants, and the need for a second ingress and egress ramp to the residential subterranean parking structure shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. e. Prior to combustible or above grade construction, a fire protection plan, pursuant to Article 87 of the Huntington Beach Fire Code, shall be submitted for approval by the Fire Department. The plan shall have provisions for: phased installation of sprinkler systems, on-site security, and telephone for emergency notification. f. Final tract map for the subject site shall be accepted by the City Council and recorded with the County Recorder®s Office. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, COASTAL. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13478 Page Seven g. A copy of the revised site plan, elevations and floor plans, pursuant to Condition No. 1 of this report shall be submitted as record for the conditional use permit file:. h. A landscape and irrigation plan pursuant to the Downtown Design Guidelines and Article 960 shall be submitted and approved by the Community Development Department and Public Works Department. i . A rooftop mechanical screening plan submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. J . An affordable housing agreement plan to provide affordable housing within 3 miles of the Coastal Zone for the replacement of the 12 existing units displaced as a result of this project shall be submitted for review and approval by the Community Development Department. k. Hydrology/hydraulic drainage studies shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for approval. 1 . A grading plan and soils report shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for approval. m. All applicable Public Works fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. n. The applicant shall post a cash deposit for the public improvements on one-half width of Main Street from Pacific Coast Highway to Heidi°s adjacent to the subject property in an amount to be determined by Public works. o. The parking facility identified in Condition No. 5 shall be approved by the City of Huntington Beach. 3. The following Fire Department requirements shall be complied with: a. Fire lane shall be minimum 27 feet clear width from Walnut to Pacific Coast Highway. Turf block is unacceptable as a fire lane surface. b. Building address numbers shall be installed pursuant to Fire Department standards. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13478 Page Eight c. Fire flow for entertainment/condominium plan is 4,750 gallons per minute. Water system shall provide minimum fire flows. d. Five fire hydrants are required for this project in locations to be approved by the Fire Department. e. Alleyway from Walnut Avenue, behind existing buildings shall be a minimum 27 feet clear width for Fire Department access. f. All structures in project Shall be provided with the following: (1) Automatic fire sprinklers throughout with combination standpipe systems; (2) Fire alarm system with graphic annunciators. g. Elevators throughout project shall be a minimum size of 6 feet-8 inches by 4 feet-3 inches with minimum opening of 42 inches. h. Access for emergency purposes shall be provided to all perimeter stairways from public streets. 4. The following Public Works Department requirements shall be complied with: a. A right turn lane shall be constructed at Pacific Coast Highway and Main Street per City and CalTrans design criteria. The appropriate right of way shall be dedicated to accommodate the right turn lane. b. The traffic signal at Pacific Coast Highway and Main Street shall be relocated per City and CalTrans standards. c. Walnut Avenue, Main Street and Second Street shall be constructed ppr Public Works standards. d. - Driveways shall be 27 feet wide minimum and radius type construction. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PEM1ITS, COASTAL DEVELOPP'fENT PERMIT NO. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT 110. 13478 Page Nine e. The parking structure for the condominium units requires two entries/exits unless one entry is determined adequate by a traffic engineer pursuant to Condition No. 2.d. f. The proposed 27 foot wide commercial alley is adequate until the property to the west dedicates an additional 5 feet. g. Landscaping (including public right of way) shall be per the Downtown Guidelines and maintained by the developer/ homeowner's association, h. Street lighting shall be installed per the Downtown Guidelines and the City electrician's requirements. j . Parking shall be prohibited on Walnut Avenue and Pacific Coast Highway. j . All utilities located in the alleys and streets to be abandoned shall be removed per the direction of utility companies' representatives. k. A 12 inch minimum sewer main shall be constructed in Main Street and walnut Avenue and connect to the County's coast truck sewer at the alley between Main and Third Street. 1. A 12 inch water mains shall be constructed in: (1) Main Street from the existing 12 inch main in the south side of Pacific Coast Highway to walnut Avenue. (2) Walnut Avenue from Main to Second Street, connecting the existing mains in the north/south alleys. (3) Second Street from walnut to Pacific Coast Highway. m. Any on-site- water facilities required to be dedicated to the City shall be located in vehicular travelways. The developer/ homeowner's association shall be held responsible for repairing the enhanced pavement, if the water facilities need to be maintained or repaired. n. All security gate configurations shall include on-site turn-arounds (no backing into the streets) and shall be approved by the Public works Department, Fire Department and Community Development Department• CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13478 Page Ten 5. The project shall be responsible for providing the balance of required off-street parking spaces in a parking structure to be built at the northwest corner of walnut and Third Streets. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, an off-site parking plan shall be approved and adopted by the City as identified in these conditions or other adequate contingency plan. Such parking sufficient for this project and off-site requirements shall be available prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the theaters. 6. Provide a centralized mail delivery facility which shall be architecturally compatible with the structures. 7. All dwellings on the subject property shall be constructed in compliance with State Acoustical standards set forth for units that are within the 60 CNEL contour of the property. 8. All guest parking spaces for residential shall be designated as such by marking "Guest Parking" on the surface of each stall. 9 . Street furniture and other required improvements shall be provided in public plaza areas according to the Downtown Design Guidelines and dedicated to the City of Huntington Beach. 10. A planned sign program shall be submitted to the Design Review Board for review and approval for all signing. Said program shall be approved by the Department of Community Development prior to the first sign request. a. Advertising of the theater complex, including the marquee, shall not be permitted at the corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Main Street. 11. All building spoils, such as unusable lumber, wire, pipe, and other surplus or unusable material, shall be disposed of at an off-site facility equipped to handle them. 12. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the locations of cooking facilities, water heaters, and central heating units. This requirement may be waived provided the applicant installs a more energy efficient alternative subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Department. 13 . Low-volume heads shall be used on all spigots and water faucets. 14. If lighting is included in the parking lot, high-pressure sodium vapor lamps shall be used for energy savings. All outside lighting shall be directed to prevent "spillage" onto adjacent properties. 8 � " CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PERMITS, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13478 Page Eleven 15. The location of the night club shall be limited to 3,000 square feet at a location facing Main Street subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. 15. Conditional Use Permit No. 88-7 and Coastal Development Permit No. 88-3 shall not become effective until the proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan are approved by City Council and in effect. 17. Any modifications to plans shall be subject to additional review and approval by the Planning Commission. Any modifications which result in an increase of project intensity shall be subject to additional public hearings. Modifications to interior layouts or exterior finishes shall be subject to Design Review Board review and approval. CQHtD TI IQNS OF APPROVAL - TENTATIVE TRACT 13478: 1. Prior to final recordation of Tentative 'Tract 13478 the following shall be completed: a. CC&R°s for the subdivision addressing the conaitions herein, Article 915 and Condition 2.d of Conditional Use Permit No. 88-7 shall be reviewed and approvea ov the f,;itv Attorney and Department of Community Development in accordance: with Article 915. b. Legal documents which will provide for restricrana the use of common spaces for the designated ouroose. as aoprvved n the final development plan, for the res : Nntsa oroF� t m shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development and the City Attorney. 2. The tentative tract map shall be revised to show: a. Typical cross section for pacific Coast Highway and the public alley. b. Right of way radii of 25 feet at Pacific Coast Highway and Main and Pacific Coast Highway and Second Street. c. Flight of way radii of 30 feet at Walnut and Second Street. d. A 12 foot wade raised median in walnut Avenue. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88-7 WITH SPECIAL PEMITS, COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 11O. 88-3 AND TENTATIVE TRACT 11O. 13478 Page Twelve e. The sidewalk in Second Street is 7 foot wide. f. Adjustment in lot lines, if necessary, to be consistent with division between commercial and condominium uses. 3. All Pacific Coast Highway improvements shall meet CalTrans criteria. 4. Vehicular access rights to the streets surrounding the tract shall be dedicated to the City except at approved driveway locations. 5. Tentative Tract No. 13478 shall not become effective until the proposed revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan have been approved by City Council and are in effect. I hereby certify that Conditional Use Permit No. 88-7 with Special Permits, Coastal Development Permit No. 88-3 and Tentative Tract No. 13478 was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Huntington Beach on April 5, 1988, upon the foregoing findings and conditions. This approval represents conceptual approval only; detailed plans must be submitted for review and the aforementioned conditions completed prior to final approval. Sincerely, Mike Adams, Secretary Planning Commission by: /! 1 ✓ti Scott es Senior Planner MA:SH:kla (0393d-1-12) .t �UBI.IC I'�OTiCE NOTICE OF A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ON THE SECOND AMENDED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CALIFORNIA RESORTS. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach will hold a joint public hearing on June 27, 1999, at 7:00 PAS In the Council Chambers, City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, to consider and act upon the Second Amended Disposition and Development Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and California Resorts and sale of the land pursuant thereto. The Agreement provides for the development of a six-plex movie theatre, retail commercial and office space along Again Street and public plaza with subterranean parking and residential condominium units, within the Alain-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. Description of the sites can be found in the Agreement. The terns of the lease and sale of property between the Agency and California Resorts are set forth in the Agreement. The proposed projects are covered by a final Environmental Impact Report for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area for which a Notice of Preparation was filed on May 6, 1985. Copies of the Amended Disposition and Development Agreement and the Environmental Impact Report are on file for public inspection and copying for the cost of duplication at the office of the City Clerk, City of Huntington Beach, California, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday thru Friday, exclusive of holidays. Interested persons may submit written comments addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, Post Office Box 190, Huntington Beach, California 92648, prior to the hour of 5:00 PM on June 24, 1988. AT the time and place noted above, all persons interested in the above matter may appear and be heard. Dated: June 10, 1988 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH,By. Alica M. Wentworth, City Clerk Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot June 13, 20, 1999 0643H yF :rg � s. a :Y5 # Iffl +ter s PUBLIC NOTICE -PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF A JOINT PUB- aration was filed on May 6; LIC HEARING BY THE CITY 1985. " COUNCIL OF HUNT- Copies of the Amended, INGTON BEACH AND THE Disposition and Develop REDEVELOPMENT AGEN. ment Agreement and the CY OF THE CITY OF,HUNT- Environmental impact Re-' INGTON BEACH ON THE port are on file for public; .AMENDED DISPOSITION Inspection and copying for# iAND DEVELOPMENT the cost Of duplication at the J AGREEMENT BETWEEN Office Of the City Clerk,City ITHE REDEVELOPMENT of Huntington Beach, 2000 AGENCY. AND -HUNgt_ Main Street. Huntington 9f 1-1 Beach, California, between f FIBr�H the hours of 8:00 A-M.and 5:00 P.M.,Monday thru Fri- day,exclusive of holidays. NOTICE .IS HEREBY Interested persons may GIVEN that the City Council submit written comments Of the City of Huntington addressed to the City Clerk Beach and the Redevelop- of the City of Huntington; ment Agency of the City of Beach,Post Office Box 190,. Huntington Beach will hold a Huntington Beach, Cali- joint public hearing o fornia 92648, prior to the h 2'i l itiS�l in hour o P.M.tin 9c$o the Council Chambers,City ber-�_ t 7 t tip inn Hall,2000 Main Street,Hunt- At the time and place. 2 t ington Beach.California,to noted above,_ all persons consider and act upon the interested in the above mat IAmended Disposition and ter may appear and be, Development Agreement heard. ` }p 1 1 All lib between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Hunt- CITY OF HUNTiNGTON i ington Beach and -Hunt- BEACH, By: Alicia M. Wentworth,City Clerk �meRh6cenale of the Published Orange Coast land pursuant thereto- The Daily Pil i s r so vibb Agreement provides tar the development of a liret-Pale M331 4y -high quality hateir retail Allov1 Q}eLt commercial and office space along Main Street and public ;plaza with epedeekiaweoer - �i ub��✓ihr%i� k,, ItJ Yelepyr&*,within the Main-( {t5i b�1 Pier Redevelopment Project; Area-- Descriptions of the' ^.wy.y�"° sites can be found. in the' GO V' •'r Agreement. i Th land safe of property between the, Agency"and 11=^"^^t Pa-; x C&I.1--",174'03 are set forth In the Agree-. ment. : -: -;The proposed projects are' covered,by="-a-firm ,,En-i vironmental Impect.Report ,for the. Main-Pier Re-- f development Project:Area for which a Notice.of Pr8s=, a e ' IPd LIC lt3OTICE NOTICE OF A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL. OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH ON THE SECOND AMENDED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEITLOPMENT AGENCY AND CALIFORNIA RESORTS. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach will hold a joint public hearing on June 27, 1988, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, to consider and act upon the Second Amended Disposition and Development Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and California Resorts and sale of the land pursuant thereto. The Agreement provides for the development of a six Alex movie theatre, retail commercial and office space along Main Street and public plaza with subterranean parking and residential condominium units, within the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area. Description of the sites can be found in the Agreement. The terms of the lease and sale of property between the Agency and California Resorts are set forth in the Agreement. The proposed projects are covered by a final Environmental Impact Report for the Main-Pier Redevelopment Project Area for which a Notice of Preparation was filed on May 6, 1985. Copies of the Amended Disposition and Development Agreement and the Environmental Impact Report are on file for public inspection and copying for the cost of duplication at the office of the City Clerk, City of Huntington Beach, California, between the hours of 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday thru Friday, exclusive of holidays. Interested persons may submit written comments addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Huntington Beach, Post Office Box 190, Huntington Beach, California 92648, prior to the hour of 5:00 PM on June 24, 1988. AT the time and place noted above, all persons interested in the above matter may appear and be heard. Dated: June 10, 1988 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, By: Alica M. Wentworth, City Clerk Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot June 13, 20. 1988 0643H ' I RUTA N & TUCKER OARv.N F.SNALLEN#C4OC4' 04R4 S.►4421CR ATTORNIEV S AT LAW URO tl.. AM D .O.-Cs R.V0049+ PA4.N T,MPOOWS NtIIO . ANL,DR. N.L.Ir.NCI rCCORw1C4• T.ONAs J.CRA.0 A PARTNCPSKIP 1NCLUCINO PPOP[SSIONAL CORPORATIONS w 411 ILLIAN e.s�¢L+ D4UCE a.BrA40 P.4...a A 4iYPMUTT• JAN[a�.LITTtS CENTRAL DANK TOWER, SUITE 1400 S W.RUTAN 4.800•IB 06641.0601 1 LLONA40 A..ANPEL' ant 9.'AULOUIST JA.R B TUC 4CR.S4,ISAG-. 021 JONM s_MU4L0u4 J. M.RAT.4R'.[JENSON SOUTH COAST PLAZA TOWN CENTER M.PODOCR wOWtu o0a0•.0031 riCr4[i w INrC..L- Jawt'L.r.CLAC.LA. MIL►D■D 0 OANL.J4' SCOTT R P.N20NE S11 ANTON BOULEVARD TM[OOOAt 1.WALLAC[.Jw• NA4V e_""SO4N PO NALO R AR4'N070 N• R.C.ARO 4.MONTt V.C[O POST 07/ICE Box 1950 R'CwA4O P SINB• DAVID 9.CO BO4OV[ MAR#.ALL M.p4A4LNAN• MA44#rITN TLTN. COSTA 14CSA, CALIFORNIA 92628.1950 TELEQMO*1E {7145 6at•gte0 0O6t4T c •4w.• cAROLC STSWENO i �213! 6Y8.95�9 POISE.A.aRAaLS• LOP,AAPNC4 SNIT. [DWA47 O.STP[$MA.JR_• JAMCS P VINC4TT TCLECOPICR (T14! S46-9Q=S 7wOYAt a 84L'NO[R• E4N[sT W.KLATTE,111 bA4RT R.L4US#CN[W' 8L12A8[T.M_COWLE[ POSCAT W At BE4T4 M.N D,Tw"040ft WILL-AM V SCNMIOT+ JATNE OANO.SK'TAT604 DAVIO C_LARSCN• PUT.i.E.8[N C,*AD[.rot.CO[•.• Jt/Ta[T W4RT.[INER TC LEe b�0 S80'Ibs] A RT.UR 0 T'a.... MANS VAN LIOTEN CABLE ADDRESS ■UTAN TUC CSYA M.C.A[L D.RUD.N• MATT.[. i4w p.QIV.N• M.G.A[L O.Tv4N[R J.'.RCT M,009".N• JO.N C RAPOSA JOSCPw D.CAapUT. PATI"ClA ANO4L OISCOE. June I3, 1988 BT4M wOLCO/T• ANO.t4 P.CABLN ROO[R•#.BOw[P' J.R4t809LL TVLC4.JR O•VIO J.AL[S.10C ROb CAT O.owe IT MARCIa A.•OaS'T. BAPPT L.AOAYO L'ILL4AN M,MARTICOP[NA ADAN N.VOLI[C4T @y JA its L,.O4a.B JCFFM%V A.POLO►ARD VIA 31iESSEAtGER 114 REPLY PLEAS[ P[►EP TO ANNC.4LBON LANP.AA sAN/DeD BNAT[ W.LL.AN J.CAPLAM PATRICK N. A.LT MIG.AAt T,.00NA4 tea r.PURCELL JANICC L•C[LOTTI CAO..J.TMO MAS Pr.L.P O•R KOw' ST[v[N TOO.SP4[CMER JOEL O. U+EeBEsO OSC"TO NO-ITZ STEVE,A.M.1;NpLB 40N1 D.JACK8ON T.ONAa 0.Baoes.NOTpN MATT.tw R S[tat4OCR w.LL.AN w T..'NOER VCLANIC C.CTRE E VR.DIK.IVIC4.1 OALLAG CN[ST4R A.PUCMAL SKI RANOALL M.DA000#'• V,NCVIN BRAZIL MAP'M.04E CN RORYN L.MOBMAN Pw'L.O N_PRINV[ LAIN[N.N[L[[A Jp—L.►[.Laws III PATRICK>.RA.►[RTY DAV.O...00"[R •A N O•..A4Tw+l ac4*A•.b• Fir. Uri E. Gate. GATI ASSOCIATES, INC. 14225 Ventura Blvd. , #200 Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 Dawn C. Honeywell, Esq. STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH 660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1600 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Mr. Mike Adams Director of Planning CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 grain Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 - Re; California Resorts DDA Dear Uri, Dawn, and Mike; I an enclosing a revised draft of the DDA which incorporates the changes discussed in our June 1, 1988, meeting at City Hall. If you want me to send a copy of the document to anyone else, please let me know. My understand- ing is that Mike will distribute copies of the DDA to anyone else at City Mall who needs to review it. I trust that the DDA is sufficiently close to the final version of the document to enable us to proceed with the RUTAN & TUGKEn� S,. ATTORNEYS AT LAW j a w....e►M..rowaw"MOOD—,eoom—"I Mr. Uri E. Gati June 13, 1988 Dawn C. Honeywell, Esq. page 2 Mr. Mike Adams scheduled public hearing on June 27th. According to my notes, the only items remaining to be resolved are as follows: 1. The Permitted Title Exceptions need to be listed in Section 201.1. If preliminary title reports are not already available, Uri or Mike should see that they are ordered immediately. Uri's engineer will have to review the underlying documents to determine whether easements, etc. , are consistent with the development plan. Please advise me as soon as -you have completed this task so that I can incorporate the infornation into the DDA. 2. In our last meeting, it was agreed that the Agency would notify Uri how much of the $1,000,000.00 available for relocation, ail, and hazardous waste removal has already been spent. There is a blank in Section 201.4 (11) to fill in this number. Please advise. 3. My notes indicated that Mike Adams was going to review the Schedule of Performance. To date, I have not heard any of Mike's comments. 4. Mike was also going to review the language in the Scope of Development regarding the Developer's obligations to provide on-site parking. If anyone has any questions regarding this last draft, please let me know. Very truly yours, RUTAN & TUCKER OPA"� Jeffrey M. Oderman JMO:jb Enclosure cc: Mr. Richard A. Harlow (w/encl.) 6/112/012304-0001/010 mFew Jj lf4 CITY OFF HUNTINGTON BEACH S INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION ft%_WG1ON BEACH TO City Clerk's Office From Michael Adams, P* b - Planning Director Subject REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA Date June 14, 1988 RESORTS DDA A public notice published In the Daily Pilot on June 13, 20, 1988 stated that copies of the Amended Disposition and Development Agreement and the Environmental Impact Report between the Redevelopment Agency and California Resorts are currently on file for public inspection in the City Clerk's office. (see attached copy of notice) These copies will be available for review on the third floor at Shelley Stice's desk. Any requests for copies may be directed to her. MA:ss (0780d) PUBLIC NOTICE`� PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE ! PU311C YOTICE �� PUBLIC. NOTTE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUNTINGTON BEACH AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.OF-THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACi; ON THE SECOND AMENDED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CALIFORNIA RESORTS. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of- Huntington Beach will hold a joint public hearing on June 27, 1988, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, to consider and act upon the Second Amended Disposition and Development Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Huntington Beach and California Resorts and sale of the land pursuant thereto. The Agreement provides for the development of a six—plex movie theatre, retail commercial and office space along Main Street and public plaza with subterranean parking and residential condominium units, within the, Main—Pier Redevelopment Project Area. Description of the sites can be found in the Agreement. The terms of the lease and sale of property between the Agency and California Resorts are set forth in the Agreement. The proposed projects are covered by a final Environmental Impact Report for the 4 Main—Pier Redevelopment Project Area for which a Notice of Preparation was filed on May 6, 1985. Copies of the Amended Disposition and Development Agreement and the Environmental Impact Report are on file for public inspection and copying for the cost of duplication at the office of the City Clerk, City of Huntington Beach, California, between the hours of 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday thru Friday, exclusive of holidays. Interested persons may submit written comments addressed to the City Clerk of the City ' of Huntington Beach, Post Office Box 190, Huntington Beach, California 92648, prior to the hour of 5:00 PM on June 24, 1988. AT the time and place noted above, all persons interested in the above matter may appear and be heard. Dated: June 10, 1988 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, By: Alica M. Wentworth, City Clerk Y f Published Orange Coast Daily Pilot June 13, 20, 1988 I I Exhibit Z WALNUT AVENUE ------------------- ------ s mm�—1 Z LANDSCAPE NQUE1 Arohitects ITS. I "a.V,eroJecDts ', ILI SAFCB I IANIICIPI BEE— F ;o 9260182 (NIBUCA',IS) B, PEl IIACI new Pwunxcrvr (PUBLIC ACCESS) ADJACENT BUILDINGS L-NU MOPENSPACE 8,MCSP— LILA n. =LANDSICAPE 1,5SSSF 175% R 4, I z 0 E 0 BUILDINGADJACENT SUMMARY OF DEVILIOPMENTS—DAR—I-L IONINAIIIIAL OR MIXED USED S—ON 4 I'll .L I — lAlY 111 111C 0 7 LF TL A mtr~u Ea' 0 I, R A IP—.1 F- z11. T�—111� B-D--A IUM— EXISTNEAREA 11�4SN NEWROLD-PREA 27772SF N,FULARE A 1 40 Lu TOTAL AREA In'BEB, RUIING FOOTPRINT 14,Il.11 C3 Cc JOE DAICHE ET NN D nne.xLP =—,CAFIEE4 LIE—OESCRIPTION Ern9 4,--441-4-4- Lu I T.�l TRACTIUMBER 13722,BLOCK." z 3/36 M ZP,� 'UNTINGION BEACH, j INTHE C"0 CEUNTI OF 0 E, BARR STATE 'CAI B NIA 17 uj z NOT FOR ON PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY CONSTI I -BIT- SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN A-0 s O © ® OO PH l i i I MHUR I A hlteCls RIC. l�10 ❑' ® °�" f o�® 0 0 — Sgeosal�role o © 8E F Ploer O •AS I•cnE000zs v aio EFE— eED,ez ,o I � � / I 0 IJ F O FE Z, �° „ 3 0 �� O 0 � z — Cr Z/ LEGEND o 5 i 0 'O O O� rv•x mlumu U bl �,.,® rv�a•�rv,� o�w�ry (�'� � 00 0 0 0l0 o,M,•wrvi� —El ry 0!a L L L El L f7 L O O zjrc FEO LPED PARKINd NEW OUP SOB STALLS 0 CI O O iOae L RESTAURANT NO STALLS OFFICE ME STALLS TOTAL PARKING MODIFIED 600 STALLS ® liL46JL�f "❑' '�„ 0 '�°' '�°' I T56] Ell T T r. PAINNGcoOUT NOTES rvo CL ooQ 9 1.rEREARE 10 UISTLNG TANDEM PARgNG SPACES ON W tl 2PARKING LEVEL Pl ,WITH APPROVED VALE*PARKING LAYOUT 2E ADDITIONAL zp /j T °r 1 CARS CAN BE PARKED ON THE FIRSTIPSI IfVELAND 36 CARS F �o�olo Io 0 oI '0 0 0 0 ch ,o, 0 y �NeEPARKE �i L TI C J J� DDNmesecouD tPzI LEVEL FOR A TOTAL OF ,Q EavALEr PaaKiNGSPAcesN TnE aDEL AKAmE Prx rnruvA OTNEREAREODDSPA R /,T, h/ ��o. _ o �'� ❑o�0❑u' EDR aTDTALDi 59EPANKiNG SPACES ICG V C p cc 4z _ a O R P N J ® NOT UOT��N T��Jam\ a a O O a ® xi) 6 E �� e 9 CONSTR °EEA-1 P2 PARKING PLAN s,•G,•._o. ---------- 0 L AN R AO"L D, U_TDt' 1.,.Ah— T 3T08,3lo E C2° QJD -oj i".M 99 El 0, 1,5 P A i L LEGEND x.wwwmu 0 HE] -�W-L:ll L FE�l ® H W,,� —PR Sll-- EIP" oil- w Fj T T T 7 A All. 90 STALLS T 11:1 Ell,T E L�l E %rRANT BEPS STALLS * W cl) 162 STALLS 2121 E-1 R E E 2 2i -E ]Fzq"I ]� xi I TOTAL PARK—FREOURREED 530 STALLS 7 , E H Lbl —1 1 L I El Fd �l LI THM V TING TA SPACES DIN LEIL [ L E —NIPRDVjC VALET PIRKING LAYOUT 28 ADDITIONAL T CARS CAN E PARKED ORTHE FBST(PL LEVELAND 36—F CAN BE PARKED ON THESECOND B21 LEVELFORATO U OF SHVILETPARKINCSPAVES 3 THIRE ARE GOD SPACES I IRE 11JELIC GARAOE PER THE 01A,DRA T.,A,.,IFV'AIKINC11.11 P, 17 511 F1 F7 7 7 F"i cc cc z c SUC�ST @ (9 1 coloT,0,T10, T (9) 0 a) (!�o @14 0 0 S —ET 10 PI PARKING PLA A-2 WALNUT AVENUE - --- -----------— ------ --- — -- � �8D�1 A,I Pns SDaclel Profecp 1980 s'EP1,�loo�r oe Angeles,CA""I"F,310.026 2106 � 310 02fi o1B2 LPLl Y natlelaro tool Rs�, ADJACENT i BUILDINGS I = j z O Al.6 Fi m ❑'ri ���ax,x6 4 ADJACENT J � BUILDING �L \J )o ��� CLx�N C {IL¢o,nmv4S ° I W 0 siaasa[nn[<, —Rrw raas«oR .. e�Reu_" a o�:�aENa.ra - LEGEND NEW BUILDING AREA 1B4O455 s GROSS NF 11ALOBBV(411") z na ` BILL AREA 19,06JSF.1 O a Z�_� wul nrv+ Qrnm.esmw ucwva - A. vLa ��— I � uo-,fvri ❑ 1/1Ld EXIISTINOOIITDOGR DINING(3D35 F) r uj S vs mix 1 o� TW 1 �n®tlpa I � y ' L 1 L ——— AP. VL __ —7— -- -- --- a,A=✓ �ra_ c3t1 �,�- --7 — --- O 7 L U O7 FOR 0 N Ra O N I a LL 1 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY EON57R L--——————— ————————————————— —————————— :L,x FIRST FLOOR PLAN _ A�3 F WALNUT AVENUE (D L,3 � 75 NfluEl Archit—Ire. mm l Port cts T 1 1;1 ez 1 12 (DK @ --A ALLEY Ito 0 I--=4 z -05 s�f 14 Z 0 D 4 gomiL z 0 EX,SERVICE u 7 110 eub Ws I ®r J-0 L9 ob 0 w 'o EEiIF�71=� Ra /Al 1 Q—p- 2` oz o X, Sulk 106A SuI-o' i e' Tisar L 11 R z/ 22 z T-'L L ca ccas -(AD PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY LL. 4c za p cc 0 0 R Lo) NO.r FO ION x , LL CONS' EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN A mRpoEl Architect Inc. Bpeclel1 310 62G 2100 C, L I LEGEND --Po' RITE... OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM JE, u (CE2 W R 0 w lK L, LLj 7 ADJACENT 710 BUILDING IL LEGEND L ST, z LT EXISTIN6DUTDOORDININC,(3,403SVI ADDED TERRACE AREA(6141Y-2,061 S F I EXISTING TERRACE AREA O,SPESF) L L I- 'MIND! It! uj bd L I z Z 0 0 0 LLI Q NSTR p U. �OT FOR UCTION CO --- w A-4 SECOND FLOOR PLAN I No El ArI'lp[s \ / Specie)Petolectes J� /Pao soo 0ioo1 / Ew AnT 3k OA90025A atos i Ote] Q oPB1A— I / k� �8 — / U —�� co .... N v U n t ADJACE BUILDING r _�L Ems/ ,,, piix is _LL 0 L / _ _ov- W 2 -- LEGEND s i »,. TLL �m - NEW Pm�mrvc APEA lsesesE ePossl _LL � i� DIN-EIr�AP rPP�s.EI —L_L , --- --- NEW TEPPACE APEA ISPBSF L mFlu1�4k m LLL EXISTING TERRACE AREA 2,-EF) G J -- L L W PiS L�I_LLL -Mllss"'CLLLLLL-LLLL L j IT �a tn__ Ll yr {i 0 z Cr oc N 1lpN co51 r a THIRD FLOOR PLAN ,�s`�`,`,_o, A_J MODEL A,chlte,As Inc P,.J..tG WE. En,fps n\ow U z Z q rr 0 ADJACENT BUILDING LLJ 0a. (L LEGEND NEW BUILDING AREA(6,670 S F GROSS) N1111ARIA(IS111.) z EXISTING TERRACE AREA 11,196 S F) sqq uj CL z 0 ,FOR 0 -1 NO' 0 ION LL LL. CON51 A-6 FOURTH FLOOR PLAN NHOR Architects Inc. r,ea En- AnTaleaaCA OB25 L = 31nB bD B2 -_ natleletc.com [l � _ Q oPS SICY+s III Qo-n-L 1 Q 4 r i Z jW 5 ADJACENT j JI � Z u j� JJ i IIBUILDING01.rc 1- a ILE�GEND _ icaas Paen scAcu rrnu LJ NEW BUILDING AREA(1,122S DUTc—DINING I152a 5 F) a v AE - LL CIL 6 y� Lu w r _ �useor r�entre�w � a U. 0 0 NOT OR ION cc CON5' RLALR LrN, . n A,7 as ROOF PLAN . .................... Z-7 Z It -T T Architects Inc Seelbl P"jects se.el"'ll .. ................. � .. -- A [,,MCAW025 A GLASS SCREEN W— ALL HIA 1, —F.F ,AV- H T I T 11 1 l? ..........- 9 11 L -j ILL-U 11, 1 'T, -T C) z z o 19 �z g GLASS RAILING DETAIL SOUTH ELEVATION 0EA w o1wx LLI a. 0 11"OVr—TAll LU es` 7� (A z R I I TITA-1— T JV pl;'l'l"l'= ON T —lT.11. OTTRUCTI FOR 0 _3 CS ON N EAST ELEVATION i IIr Arehltad,ins. �- - Spacial Prgects i9so sF sand —— or v"orn�ro,�,r O ra..rm "rmn.u,v. ,.�,. Foioersmez , s<^'E — / ELEVATION AT ATM ,�,.-,.-�. QA RM, --- . \ rw.nxnr.uovi sysr n,nvevnrsrAin own„o., "e..nv�rx u.ren"ovn� �- isr o'v�< a ..nemav,rneu.0 w.maviro. , I -- -nisuueas.�n.s,on,m.�" co r m,rcx xew n."onr wA.m shun nm siza`n`�°i Z — n. n„u a �� 0 3 WEST ELEVATION _U W O—Q Oda--——O — O O O Q Q = o IL 7- x�rvm�;r"nwA w _ n.w,An„wsxr.m,„r �. i .m x.�nrrn z I — Lu -- / ®'� _ N 'M \ - \\ —=.I novrnor.rsvnrmre.uuArvorws-- .,�,,,,exreuuowv Y 4t O —N na no.r a nE,ro.rm.„ CCLIA W r.nW�a. «won` „r" ,n<..r NOT 0 7IoN S W � 0N5 U� T.,E i NORTH ELEVATION ,zs`„`._. A_9 _------_----------- Architects Inc. scelel p A,0. ,rr 8262100 F�310 826 0181 (D F77 F77 IL Lm m I k _Ap I 1L 0, '1"1 THI o D z 0 6 WEST SECTION/ELEVATION 2 "Ir 1 l" O Z qL 7- U.1 sev— t _7 4 Nil AN, ........... t E! Bic 0 0 �T FOR N(TVUCTION z w CONS -------L,� l A-10 NORTH SECTION/ELEVATION I I j�'.� • ' I ..P n.�nn. lot V .� s. - Idea,' ■kkayypp i Fikil I es�= iiNi1111 c ?i..� ille ni• r� ^,, �, � ar I�r �4 u�. �1 �'�j•l rt�,.. • nw_a"ir �1 i IV • • • • v1 o� I n u.i .. 1 s a a •f\ w . yyn♦j , .,r �o ADDEL ArNmtaoLa L Special Pra�ac'S nImr Los A—- - BOa26 T 3108262100 F 313826�i62 J � G ,I- -Z: �P I l a — t Ak 7' l — _ - _ E � LIB iTr �I — J' 1 O0 NI AJ L � - T --� -- L- !-- -- - s! 1 - Ir j'-�-' _ -- - 'I� —�1 ._ �IF AI IF G LU CAI ccLU a$ z y y Q W C N",,,ION c® 9 A-12 VIEW FROM PCH AND MAINRE 1 -P NOBEc e Special Projects bar L.Nngalee�CA 90035 T etee]e Rf" tO B266162 U� � J �L 1 f- LD -1--- -J, - _ T W 110 '`j i a s tyd sccif'�' Ili _ ii -—---------- c� z W NO7 fO 7ION Cl) �' ��N57R�C VIEW OF MAIN ENTRY A-13 MHOEctL A,ch, �-H I"A.�L.,Al.cA e I Ismsar -------------- ---------- Ji IT w IT" R j Tr 0 Ld IL L t lad17, I Z - iTaik,ORO* L I �_ - - - - 1 l ------- -- -- --�,I _ ll� j I IF TTF __T LU-F, --T u TF J� T11 4L IL-L J_ L a_ L CL co NOTFOR -rloN CONSTSLJC VIEW FROM PCH A-14 Ns�eolslOBA.h, ds Inc. A—11 —Elf z '�- -_—- _ / _-__- -- III -- _----=-( "_ __ -= Z) z 144 d�aw t III I J i 7fil I. (00,J (A M I I_77- To IT LLJ ai Jt CO NOT RUCTION 9RUCTION NOT VIEW FROM PIER A-15 - -- -- -- - ■. -, i.._` -_`- mod•-' �u����r�■ 80UTH ELEVATION CL cc oll 00 Ii��l . ��■��►1\■Il�l�llt�i�ll��ll�� �11■■■�1� 11■ ■■ 1 �� ■■■■■■ ■IN■■\■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■�■■■�� ---- „ii �I NOOR Door _ Z IP WEST ELEVATION - �I6'�1 u J u o a O i = g ! "71 a • ___— a ui s� �I w W = w; 2 Jt �=t W U 2 W NORTH ELEVATION A-17 Exhibit AA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT:SCOPING ADA CHAPTER 2:SCOPING REQUIREMENTS 208 Parking Spaces 208.1 General. Where parking spaces are provided, parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with 208. EXCEPTION: Parking spaces used exclusively for buses, trucks, other delivery vehicles, law enforcement vehicles, or vehicular impound shall not be required to comply with 208 provided that lots accessed by the public are provided with a passenger loading zone complying with 503. 208.2 Minimum Number. Parking spaces complying with 502 shall be provided in accordance with Table 208.2 except as required by 208.2.1, 208.2.2, and 208.2.3. Where more than one parking facility is provided on a site, the number of accessible spaces provided on the site shall be calculated according to the number of spaces required for each parking facility. Table 208.2 Parking Spaces Total Number of Parking Spaces Minimum Number of Required Provided in Parking Facility Accessible Parking Spaces 1 to 25 1 26 to 50 2 51 to 75 3 76 to 100 4 101 to 150 5 151 to 200 6 201 to 300 7 301 to 400 8 401 to 500 9 501 to 1000 2 percent of total 1001 and over 20, plus 1 for each 100, or fraction thereof, over 1000 Advisory 208.2 Minimum Number. The term "parking facility" is used Section 208.2 instead of the term "parking lot" so that it is clear that both parking lots and parking structures are required to comply with this section. The number of parking spaces required to be accessible is to be calculated separately for each parking facility; the required number is not to be based on the total number of parking spaces provided in all of the parking facilities provided on the site. Department of Justice 2010 Standards: Titles 11 and III - 65 Exhibit AB WALNUT AVENUE N ------ Nflo.El M, j It, tt 1 _-j 41 Ld I - I vi �I Ai .... ...................... ...... -17-7 ADJACENTBUILDINGS _- - 1 -�'`f ....rv.,.,, HIM,- A B Li zol Pt 14 IRIC F- M! , —EXISTING MODIFIED FIRELANE ROLLED CURB, TO REMAIN "w RELOCATED PALM TREE,TYP. P X 7j L z U r 'J0Tr,T,oN PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY CcN5TF0 —-—-—- SITEILANDSCAPE PLAN A-0 Exhibit AC Occupational Safety and Health Admin., labor §1910.95 §1910.95 Occupational noise exposure. TABLE G-16—PERMISSIBLE NOISE EXPOSURES 1 (a) Protection against the effects of Sound noise exposure shall be provided when Duration per day,hours level dBA the sound levels exceed those shown in sponse Table G-16 when measured on the A scale of a standard sound level meter 6 """ 90 at slow response. When noise levels are a ................._................................. 95 determined by octave band analysis, s ......... ......... ....... ............. 97 the equivalent A-weighted sound level 2........... .................. .................. 100 may be determined as follows: 11/2....................................................................... 102 1 ........................................................................... 105 140 '/2 ......................................................................... 110 orless.................................-.......................... 115 130 - 125 'When the daily noise exposure is composed of two or - more periods of noise exposure of different levels,their com- 120 i bined effect should be considered,rather than the individual > > effect of each.If the sum of the following fractions:C,IT,+C, 120 Its O T C„JT exceeds unity, then,the mixed exposure should be considered to exceed the limit value. Cn indicates the total a'^„ W time of exposure at a specified noise level,and Tn indicates q m �05 the total time of exposure permitted at that level. jv110 0 Exposure to impulsive or impact noise should not exceed O n W 140 dB peak sound pressure level. 3 Z- too < (c) Hearing conservation program. (1) 700 W The employer shall administer a con- > 9s < tinuing, effective hearing conservation 90 — 90 a program, as described in paragraphs (c) o W through (o) of this section, whenever so employee noise exposures equal or ex- 100 200 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 ceed an 8-hour time-weighted average HAND CENTER FREQUENCY IN CYCLES PER SECOND sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels meas- ured on the A scale (slow response) or, FIGURE G-9 equivalently, a dose of fifty percent. Equivalent sound level contours. Octave For purposes of the hearing conserva- band sound pressure levels may be converted tion program, employee noise expo- to the equivalent A-weighted sound level by sures shall be computed in accordance plotting them on this graph and noting the with appendix A and Table G-I6a, and A-weighted sound level corresponding to the without regard to any attenuation pro- point of highest penetration into the sound vided by the use of personal protective level contours. This equivalent A-weighted equipment. sound level, which may differ from the ac- tual A-weighted sound level of the noise, is (2) For purposes of paragraphs (c) used to determine exposure limits from through (n) of this section, an 8-hour Table 1.G-16. time-weighted average of 85 decibels or a dose of fifty percent shall also be re- (b)(1) When employees are subjected ferred to as the action level. to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or Monitoring, (1) When information engineering controls shall be utilized. indicates that any employee's exposure If such controls fail to reduce sound may equal or exceed an 8 time levels within the levels of Table G-16, Weighted average of 85 decibels, the personal protective equipment shall be employer shall develop and implement provided and used to reduce sound lev- a monitoring program. (i) The sampling strategy shall be de- els within the levels of the table. signed to identify employees for inclu- (2) If the variations in noise level in- volve maxima at intervals of 1 second gran in the hearing conservation pro- or less, it is to be considered contin- gram and to enable the proper selec- tion of hearing protectors. uous. (ii) Where circumstances such as high worker mobility, significant variations 211 Exhibit AD U'OrURBAM 41 Corporate Park, Suite 300 Irvine, CA 92606 Prepared by: Bill Lawson, P.E., INCE J.T. Stephens, INCE Prepared for: CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH Department of Planning & Building 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648-2702 PIERSIDE PAVILION IMPROVEMENTS NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA June 12,2012 (Revised) April 16, 2012 (Revised) November 7, 2011 JN:07984-05 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................. 1 1.1 Off-Site Transportation Noise Analysis 1.2 Off-Site Stationary Noise Analysis 1.3 Construction Noise Analysis 1.4 Construction Vibration Impacts 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 4 2.1 Purpose of Report 2.2 Site Location 2.3 Project Description 3.0 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS ................................................................................ 3 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Noise Descriptors 2.3 Noise Control 2.4 Ground Absorption 2.5 Noise Barrier Attenuation 2.6 Community Response to Noise 2.7 Land Use Compatibility With Noise 4.0 REGULATORY SETTING ............................................................................... 12 4.1 City of Huntington Beach Noise Element 4.2 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code 4.3 Significance Criteria 5.0 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS ...................................................... 15 5.1 Measurement Procedure and Criteria 5.2 Noise Measurement Locations 5.3 Noise Measurement Results 6.0 OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ............................................................. 24 6.1 FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model 6.2 Traffic Noise Prediction Model Inputs 6.3 Traffic Noise Contours 6.4 Existing Roadway Noise Levels 6.5 Future Conditions Roadway Noise Levels 6.6 Year 2020 Project Traffic Noise Level Contributions 6.7 Off-Site Transportation Related Project Noise Mitigation 7.0 OFF-SITE OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY RELATED NOISE IMPACTS ......................... 35 7.1 Project Related Stationary Source Noise 7.2 Reference Noise Level Impacts 7.2.1....Restaurant Terrace Activities 7.2.2....Air Conditioning Units 7.3 Project Only Stationary Source Noise Impacts 7.4 Stationary Source Project Noise Level Impacts Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ®� City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.07984-05 Report) L UR BAIV CROSSROADS TABLE OF CONTENTS CONT. Section Page 8.0 OFF-SITE CONSTRUCTION RELATED NOISE IMPACTS ..................................... 43 8.1 Construction Activities 8.2 Construction Noise Levels 8.2.1....Demolition Activities 8.2.2....Site Preparation Activities 8.2.3....Physical Building Improvements 8.2.4....Architectural Coating Activities 8.3 Construction Noise Impacts 8.4 Construction Vibration Impacts Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis URBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN: 07984-05 Report) CRoSSRCP.AOS I I APPENDICES City of Huntington Beach Noise Element...................................................................................................4.1 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code..................................................................................................4.2 Approved Specific Plan Noise Criteria.......................................................................................................4.3 StudyArea Photos ....................................................................................................................................5.1 NoiseMonitoring Data Printouts ..............................................................................................................5.2 Short-Term Noise Measurement to Hourly Leq Calculations .................................................................5.3 Off-Site Transportation Noise Contour Printouts .....................................................................................6.1 Off-Site Operation Related Noise Level Impact Calculations.....................................................................7.1 Construction Related Reference Noise Levels Database..........................................................................8.1 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Paqe 2-A Location Map....................................................................................................................................5 2-B Site Plan ...........................................................................................................................................6 3-A Typical Noise Levels and Their Subjective Loudness and Effects....................................................9 5-A Noise Monitoring Locations.............................................................................................................16 7-A Operational Noise Impacts..............................................................................................................37 8-A Typical Construction Noise Levels..................................................................................................44 Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis � City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) U crzoRssRAN III LIST OF TABLES Table Paqe 5-1 Long-Term (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements- Friday ............................................................18 5-2 Long-Term (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements- Saturday........................................................19 5-3 Long-Term (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements- Sunday..........................................................20 5-4 Long-Term (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements- Monday..........................................................21 5-5 Existing Short-Term (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements ...........................................................22 6-1 Off-Site Roadway Parameters .......................................................................................................26 6-2 Average Daily Traffic for Existing and Year 2020 Conditions .........................................................27 6-3 Hourly Traffic Flow Distribution.......................................................................................................28 6-4 Existing Conditions Noise Contours................................................................................................29 6-5 Year 2020 Without Project Conditions Noise Contours...................................................................30 6-6 Year 2020 With Project Conditions Noise Contours........................................................................31 6-7 Year 2020 Off-Site Project Related Traffic Noise Impacts ..............................................................33 7-1 Reference Noise Level Measurements...........................................................................................36 7-2 Project Only Stationary Source Impact Noise Level Projections.....................................................39 7-3 Daytime (7 a.m. to 10 p.m.) Project Noise Contributions ................................................................41 7-4 Nighttime (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) Project Noise Contributions ..............................................................42 8-1 Demolition Construction Noise Levels ............................................................................................46 8-2 Site Preparation Noise Levels.........................................................................................................47 8-3 Physical Building Improvements Noise Levels................................................................................48 8-4 Architectural Coatings Construction Noise Levels ..........................................................................49 Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.07984-05 Report) CROSSROAE)S iv PIERSI®E PAVILION IMPROVEMENTS NOISE ANALYSIS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 100 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This noise study has been completed to determine the noise impacts associated with the proposed Pierside Pavilion Improvements at the southeast corner of Main Street and Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Huntington Beach. The project proposes to expand the office, retail and restaurant portions of the commercial center. The purpose of this noise assessment is to evaluate the noise impacts for the project study area and to recommend noise mitigation measures, if necessary, to minimize the potential project impacts. 1.1 Off-Site Transportation Noise Analysis To assess the off-site noise level impacts associated with development of the proposed project, noise contour boundaries were developed for existing and Year 2020 traffic scenarios. The analysis shows that the proposed project's contributions to off-site roadway noise increases for Year 2020 will not cause any significant impacts to any existing or future sensitive noise receptors or expose persons to noise levels in excess of the standards established in the City of Huntington Beach General Plan. 1.2 Off-Site Stationary Noise Analysis This section analyzes the potential off-site operational noise impacts resulting from the proposed improvements to the Pierside Pavilion development. The stationary noise impacts associated with the proposed project include the second floor restaurant terrace activities, roof terrace activities and the roof-top air conditioners. Existing noise sensitive residential uses are located east of the new restaurant space on the southeastern portion of the project site. Based upon the reference noise level measurements, it is possible to estimate the noise level impacts associated with the proposed Pierside Pavilion to the adjacent noise-sensitive uses. The stationary source noise level estimates include the second floor restaurant terrace activities, roof terrace activities and the roof-top air conditioners. The unmitigated noise level impacts associated with the operation of the proposed project site are expected to reach 62.8 dBA Leq. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.07984-05 Report) U GROSSROAOS 1 The noise level impacts calculations also consider the noise attenuation provided by the proposed plexi-glass terrace barrier as well as 5-foot high parapet walls on the surrounding the rooftop air conditioning units. . In addition, the roof terrace will be separated from the neighboring residential units with a 13.5-foot high mechanical ventilation room. With the proposed noise barriers, the project only noise levels at the adjacent receptor are expected to reach 54.4 dBA Leq To assess the operational related noise level impacts, the stationary source noise level estimates generated by the project were compared to the standards established in the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance as well as the significance criteria presented in Section 4.3 of this report. In order to assess the level of significance, the existing ambient noise level measurements were combined with the stationary source noise level estimates generated by the project. The analysis shows that the daytime and nighttime project only noise level contributions will range from 0.4 to 0.8 dBA Leq when compared with the quietest daytime and nighttime hours. These barely perceptible noise level impacts will contribute less than 3.0 dBA to the existing residential uses, and, therefore, the proposed project will not create a significant noise impact to the surrounding receptors. In addition, the project only noise level impacts will not exceed the existing ambient noise levels which according to the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance becomes the standard (8.40.060) 1.3 Construction Noise Analysis Construction noise represents a short-term impact on the ambient noise levels. Noise generated by construction equipment, including trucks, power tools, concrete mixers and portable generators may reach high noise levels. The City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code exempts noise impacts from construction related activities that occur within the applicable noise hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays. Though the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code exempts construction noise, the proposed project will incorporate the construction mitigation measures that were included in the City of Huntington Beach Downtown Specific Plan EIR, the land use document that governs the site. These mitigation measures, which are listed in Section 8.3, shall be implemented during construction to assure a less than significant impact at the nearby noise- sensitive residents. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis � City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.•07984-05 Report) URBAN cRossrzo o 2 1.4 Construction Vibration Impacts Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. Construction vibration is generally associated with pile driving and rock blasting. Occasionally large bulldozers and loaded trucks can cause perceptible vibration levels at close proximity. However, since the proposed Project is not expected to employ any pile driving, rock blasting or heavy grading equipment and with residential uses located greater than 10 feet from construction activities, impacts from groundborne vibration are anticipated to be less-than-significant. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ��� City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) cRossrzAN 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION This noise study has been completed to determine the noise impacts associated with off-site traffic noise impacts, on-site operational noise impacts, and temporary construction noise and vibration impacts related to the proposed Pierside Pavilion improvements located in the City of Huntington Beach, California. 2.1 Purpose of Report This noise study briefly describes the proposed project, provides information regarding noise fundamentals, describes the local noise guidelines, and presents an analysis of the potential off- site project-related noise impacts. This study has been prepared to satisfy the City of Huntington Beach noise standards. 2.2 Site Location The project is located at the southeast corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Main Street in the City of Huntington Beach. The location of the Project site within the study area is presented at Exhibit 2-A. 2.3 Proiect Description The project is located in the City of Huntington Beach Downtown Specific Plan area, which consists of residential, recreational, retail, office and other mixed uses in the downtown and beachside areas of Huntington Beach. The Pierside Pavilion is one such mixed-use site, located in District 3 of the downtown area, and includes a two-level parking structure located at 300 Pacific Coast Highway, bounded by Pacific Coast Highway to the west, Main Street to the north, and Walnut Avenue to the east. Exhibits 2-B and illustrate the Site Plan for the Pierside Pavilion Office and Retail improvements. This study has considered the following proposed project components: • Expansion of existing Retail Space (approximately 9,000 square feet) Expansion of Existing Office Space (approximately 21,000 square feet) ® Approximately 3,000 square feet expansion to existing Restaurant use. Mostly includes Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBANCity of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) 4 i,_ ! ��- � � �1 �� � �•� r � ..a ",�, ',�„ �Imo, �k {',.t Ei m 4 • KR Y. - . r y r " S aR R a Q L UJAT` Oceon � � � EXHIBIT 2-13 SITE PLAN k WALNUT AVENUE L J, — —— i c 7 "R _ 1 z4w I i ci+J ADJACENT ` BUILDINGS I ADJACENT t BUILDING � ���� au,awMrl� t � G g q � _ :.^�^,4 _`� m �S�� •o,mrvuru�w�vwu -- -- a I,t t � , -,.._fir .•t I .�.w � �...x 7a PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN-07984:001.dwg) CROSSROADS 6 amendments to the North (Main Street) and east (Walnut Avenue) Outdoor Dining Areas, such as amending the existing hardscape and expanding the outdoor dining areas on the north side of the building along Main Street. The proposed restaurant improvements generally require the extension of sidewalk and removal of three (3) existing angled on- street parking stalls on the south side of Main Street. The restaurant expansion component also includes expanding the existing outdoor dining area on the east side of the Pierside Pavilion building along Walnut Avenue through modifications to the existing hardscape. The proposed improvements require widening the existing sidewalk on the east side of the building, eliminating the south bound-rig ht turn picket into the Pierside Pavilion parking structure from Walnut Avenue. For analysis purposes, consistent with the project's Traffic Study, impacts resulting from the Pierside Pavilion Project consists the proposed expansion of existing Retail, Restaurant and Office space throughout the four-level Pierside Pavilion building. The existing building modifications shall provide additional square footage by constructing new building area for Office, Retail and Restaurant use, and in-filling portions of the current structure within the footprint of the existing building. The new project as currently designed will result in approximately 10,100 square feet of additional Retail space (43% in-fill, 57% new); 7,800 square feet of additional Restaurant space (19% in-fill, 81% new); and 15,934 square feet of additional Office space (2% in-fill, 98% new). However the project applicant anticipates the potential for modifications to occur in the final square footage allocations and thus has requested to establish a final allowance for +12,594 square feet of additional Retail use; +12,213 square feet of Restaurant use; and +17,818 square feet of Office use. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis � � City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.•07984-05 Report) CROSSROADS 7 3.0 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS The purpose of this section is to provide basic information about noise and to present key terms and concepts used in this report. 3.1 Introduction Noise has been simply defined as "unwanted sound." Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm, or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A-weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise sources by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. Exhibit 3-A presents a summary of the typical noise levels and their subjective loudness and effects that are described in more detail below. 3.2 Noise Descriptors Environmental noise descriptors are generally based on averages, 'rather than instantaneous, noise levels. The most commonly used figure is the equivalent level (Leq). Equivalent sound levels are not measured directly but are calculated from sound pressure levels typically measured in A-weighted decibels (dBA). The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. A single-event noise exposure level (SENEL) is the sound exposure level of a single noise event (such as an aircraft flyover or train pass-by) measured over the time interval between the initial and final times for which the sound level of the single event exceeds the background noise level. 3.3 Noise Control Noise control is the process of obtaining an acceptable noise environment for a particular observation point or receiver by controlling the noise source, transmission path, receiver, or all three. This concept is known as the source-path-receiver concept. In general, noise control measures can be applied to any and all of these three elements. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis City of Huntington Beach, CA(M 07984-05 Report) 0 OSSRCP^DS 8 EXHIBIT 3-A TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS AND THEIR SUBJECTIVE LOUDNESS AND EFFECTS COMMON OUTDOOR COMMON INDOOR A- WEIGHTED SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES SOUND LEVEL dEA LOUDNESS NOISE THRESHOLD OF PAIN 140 NEAR JET ENGINE 130 120 JET FLY-OVER AT 300m(1000 ft) ROCK BAND 110 ' LOUD AUTO HORN 100 GAS LAWN MOWER AT 1m(3 ft) 90 DIESEL TRUCK AT 15m(50 ft),at 80 FOOD BLENDER AT 1 m(3 ft) 80 km/hr(50 mph) z, NOISY URBAN AREA,DAYTIME VACUUM CLEANER AT 3m(10 ft) 70 SPEECH LOUD, INTERFERENCE,- HEAVY TRAFFIC AT 90m(300 ft) NORMAL SPEECH AT 1 m(3 ft) 50 QUIET URBAN DAYTIME LARGE BUSINESS OFFICE 50 MODERATE SLEEP QUIET URBAN NIGHTTIME THEATER,LARGE CONFERENCE 40 DISTURBANCE ROOM(BACKGROUND) QUIET SUBURBAN NIGHTTIME LIBRARY 30 BEDROOM AT NIGHT,CONCERT FAINT QUIET RURAL NIGHTTIME HALL(BACKGROUND) 20 NO EFFECT BROADCAST/RECORDING 10 STUDIO VERY FAINT LOWEST THRESHOLD OF HUMAN LOWEST THRESHOLD OF HUMAN 0 HEARING HEARING SOURCE: NOISE TECHNICAL SUPPLEMENT BY CALTRANS Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis 011011113AN City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN-07984:005.dwg) CROSSROADS 9 3.4 Ground Absorption To account for the ground-effect attenuation (absorption), two types of site conditions are commonly used in traffic noise models, soft site and hard site conditions. Soft site conditions account for the sound propagation loss over natural surfaces such as normal earth and ground vegetation. A drop-off rate of 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance is typically observed over soft ground with landscaping, as compared with a 3.0 dBA drop-off rate over hard ground such as asphalt, concrete, stone and very hard packed earth. Based on our experience, soft site conditions better reflect the predicted noise levels. In addition, Caltrans' research has shown that the use of soft site conditions is more appropriate for the application of the FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) traffic noise prediction model used in this analysis. 3.5 Noise Barrier Attenuation Effective noise barriers can reduce noise levels by 10 to 15 dBA, cutting the loudness of traffic noise in half. A noise barrier is most effective when placed close to the noise source or receiver. Noise barriers, however, do have limitations. For a noise barrier to work, it must be high enough and long enough to block the view of the noise source. 3.6 Community Response to Noise Approximately ten (10) percent of the population has a very low tolerance for noise, and will object to any noise not of their own making. Consequently, even in the quietest environment, some complaints will occur. Another 25 percent of the population will not complain even in very severe noise environments. Thus, a variety of reactions can be expected from people exposed to any given noise environment. Despite this variability in behavior on an individual level, the population as a whole can be expected to exhibit the following responses to changes in noise levels. An increase or decrease of 1.0 dBA cannot be perceived except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments. A 3.0 dBA increase may be perceptible outside of the laboratory. An increase of 5.0 dBA is often necessary before any noticeable change in community response (i.e., complaints) would be expected. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) OUROAM 10 Community responses to noise may range from registering a complaint by telephone or letter, to initiating court action, depending upon each individual's susceptibility to noise and personal attitudes about noise. Several factors are related to the level of community annoyance including: ® Fear associated with noise producing activities; ® Socio-economic status and educational level of the receptor; ® Noise receptor's perception that they are being unfairly treated; ® Attitudes regarding the usefulness of the noise-producing activity; ® Receptor's belief that the noise source can be controlled. 3.7 Land Use Compatibility With Noise Some land uses are more tolerant of noise than others. For example, schools, hospitals, churches and residences are more sensitive to noise intrusion than are commercial or industrial activities. As ambient noise levels affect the perceived amenity or livability of a development, so too can the mismanagement of noise impacts impair the economic health and growth potential of a community by reducing the area's desirability as a place to live, shop and work. For this reason, land use compatibility with the noise environment is an important consideration in the planning and design process. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) U URBAN 11 4.0 REGULATORY SETTING Local noise guidelines are often based on the broader guidelines established by state and federal agencies. This section describes the regulatory setting for the proposed Pierside Pavilion Improvements. 4.1 City of Huntington Beach Noise Element The City of Huntington Beach Noise Element identifies an exterior noise level impact standard of 65 dBA CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) for new residential developments and states that new residential developments in those areas that will experience an exterior noise level greater than 65 dBA CNEL are required to have a noise study performed to determine what level of sound insulation, if any, is required to meet the acceptable interior noise level impact standards established. The interior noise level impact standard for the City of Huntington Beach is 45 dBA CNEL. The City of Huntington Beach Noise Element is presented in Appendix 4.1. 4.2 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Section 8.40.050 of the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code provides the following stationary source non-transportation related nuisance noise level standards by land use within the City: Noise Zone Sound Level dBA Time Period All Residential Properties 50 dBA 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 a.m. 55 dBA 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. All Professional Office And Public 55 dBA Anytime Institution Properties All Other Commercial Properties 60 dBA Anytime All Industrial Properties 70 dBA Anytime These levels are measured at the property line separating the source and the noise sensitive receptor. If a noise barrier is present, the receptor location is moved to a distance of 10 feet from the noise barrier. If the ambient noise level exceeds the applicable limit noted above, the ambient noise level becomes the standard. Section 8.40.060: Exterior Noise Levels Prohibited, noise levels shall not exceed the ambient noise levels in Section 8.40.050 by the following dB(A) levels for the cumulative period of time specified: Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis �� City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) CROSSROADS 12 (a) For a cumulative period of more than thirty minutes in any hour; (b) Plus 5 dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than fifteen (15) minutes in any hour; (c) Plus 10 dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than five (5) minutes in any hour; (d) Plus 15 dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than one (1) minute in any hour; (e) 20 dB(A) or more for any period of time. Section 8.40.090 (d) under the Special Provisions section states that "Noise sources associated with construction (are exempt from the noise ordinance) provided a permit has been obtained from the City; and provided said activities do not take place between the hours of 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday." The City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code is presented in Appendix 4.2. 4.3 Significance Criteria The following significance criteria are based on guidance provided by Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. For the purposes of this report, noise impacts would be potentially significant if the proposed Project is determined to result in or cause: • Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; • A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above existing levels without the proposed Project; or • A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above noise levels existing without the proposed Project. While the CEQA Guidelines and the City of Huntington Beach noise standards provide direction on noise compatibility and establish noise standards by land use type, they do not define the levels at which increases above the ambient noise levels are considered substantial. However, the Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans both identify changes in noise levels of greater than 3 dBA as "barely perceptible," while changes of 5 dBA are considered "readily perceptible." This is consistent with the community response to noise characteristics described at Section 2.6 of this report. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ��� � City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) crzossRAM 13 In a community situation, the noise exposure is extended over a long time period, and changes in noise levels occur over years rather than the immediate comparison made in a laboratory situation. The level at which changes in community noise levels become discernible is likely to be some value greater than 1 dBA, and 3 dBA appears to be appropriate for most people. On this basis, and for the purposes of this study, a substantial increase in noise levels attributable to operations of the Project would occur if: 1. For operational noise: • Ambient conditions are below applicable standards, and (i) project-generated noise would result in an exceedance of the noise guidelines for surface transportation (mobile) sources in the City of Huntington Beach Noise Element at receptor land uses, or (ii) project generated noise plus ambient noise would exceed the noise guidelines for stationary sources in the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance by 3 dBA (a "barely perceptible" increase) or greater; or • If ambient noise conditions exceed applicable Noise Element or Noise Ordinance Standards and project-generated noise would create a 3 dBA ("barely perceptible") or greater permanent increase in ambient exterior noise levels. 2. For construction noise, a substantial noise impact would occur if activities occur outside the allowed daytime construction noise hours of 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. The level of significance criteria presented above is consistent with the significance criteria presented in the approved City of Huntington Beach Downtown Specific Plan EIR by Hodge & Associates in July 2009 and is included in Appendix 4.3. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ��V���� City of Huntington Beach,CA(M 07984-05 Report) crzoss A1V 14 5.0 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS To evaluate the existing noise level environment, three (3) long-term 24-hour measurements and one (1) short-term measurement were taken at locations throughout the project site. Exhibit 5-A shows the boundaries of the project study area and the noise level measurement locations. The long-term 24-hour noise level measurements, taken over the course of 4 days, were positioned at three locations along the existing commercial building on the eastern side of the project site at varying distances from Pacific Coast Highway and Walnut Avenue. To supplement the long-term measurements, a 10-minute, short-term sample noise level measurement was taken at the southern portion of the project site. The noise level measurements were recorded by Urban Crossroads, Inc. from October 28th to 31st, 2011. Appendix 5.1 includes a photo index of the project study area. 5.1 Measurement Procedure and Criteria The short-term noise measurement was taken using a Larson-Davis Model 824 Type 1 precision sound level meter. The 24-hour noise readings were recorded using a Quest DL Pro data logging Type 2 noise dosimeter. All noise meters were programmed in "fast" mode to record noise levels in "A"weighted form. The sound level meters and microphone were mounted on a tripod, five feet above the ground and equipped with a windscreen during all measurements. The Larson Davis Model 824 sound level meter was calibrated before the monitoring using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 150 and the Quest DL noise dosimeter was calibrated using a Quest QC-10 calibrator. All noise level measurement equipment meets American National Standards Institute (ANSI) specifications for sound level meters (Standard S1.4-1983). 5.2 Noise Measurement Locations The Pierside Pavilion contains both commercial and office uses. More specifically, the existing project site contains retail uses, restaurants with outdoor seating areas, a bar, and office space. The subject site is bounded to the north by Walnut Avenue; to the east by existing multi-family residential units; to the south by Pacific Coast Highway; and to the west by Main Street. The existing noise environment is dominated by traffic noise from Pacific Coast Highway and activities associated with the surrounding stores. Exhibit 5-A presents the noise measurement locations. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBANCity of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.07984-05 Report) cRossR 15 EXHIBIT 5-A NOISE MONITORING LOCATIONS WALNUT AVENUE j 7- I. V L1 II i _ �_ + e:�v ADJACENT BUILDINGS cc ==k ADJACENT BUILDING Niff x 36" le. 17�-"L-- 3 S1 - -- -------- PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY LEGEND: LONG-TERM,24-HOUR,NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATION SHORT-TERM,10-MINUTE,NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATION Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN-07984:004.dwg) OURBAM RC3 CSSRC3ADS 16 Long-Term noise measurement locations L1 through L3 were monitored for a time period of 72 hours. • Site L1 is located approximately 70 feet south of the Walnut Avenue centerline on the northeast portion of the project site. • Site L2 is located approximately 150 feet south of the Walnut Avenue centerline on the eastern portion of the project site. • Site L3 is located approximately 180 feet north of the southern property line on the southeastern portion of the project site. Short-term noise level measurement location S1 was monitored for a period of 10 minutes. Site S1 is located approximately 100 feet north of the Pacific Coast Highway centerline along the southern portion of the proposed project. 5.3 Noise Measurement Results The results of the noise level measurements are presented in Tables 5-1 through 5-5 with noise monitoring results printouts included in Appendix 5.2. After reviewing the data, it was determined that noise levels on the southern portion of the project site are impacted mostly by traffic on Pacific Coast Highway where noise levels on the northern portion of the project site are affected by public activity from the nearby shops, bars and restaurants . Data for all days are included in the Appendix 5.1, however, a summary of the noise levels are presented in this section. • Hourly noise levels at Site L1 ranged from 52.6 dBA Leq (late Sunday night) to 60.3 dBA Leq (Monday morning). • Hourly noise levels at Site L2 ranged from 55.4 (late Sunday night) to 66.4 dBA Leq (early Friday evening). • Hourly noise levels at Site L3 ranged from 56.0 dBA Leq (early Monday morning) to 60.2 dBA Leq (Sunday afternoon). • Short-term noise measurement at S1 produced a noise level of 65.6 dBA Leq which is consistent with the existing noise level contours calculated from the Pierside Pavilion Traffic Study traffic volumes and presented in Section 6.0 of this analysis. Additionally, projected Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis City of Huntington Beach,CA(JN:07984-05 Report) CROSSROADS 17 Table 5-1 Long-Term (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements' Friday, October 28th, 2011 Daytime Hourly Nighttime Hourly Observer Time Of Primary Noise Noise Levels Noise Levels Location Description Measurement Source (Leq dBA)3 (Leq dBA)3 Located approximately 70 feet south Ambient and of the Walnut Avenue centerline on 4:00 P.M. - L1 the northeast portion of the project 12:00 A.M. Traffic on Walnut 57.1 -58.7 59.0 - 59.1 site. Avenue Located approximately 150 feet south 4:00 P Ambient and L2 of the Walnut Avenue centerline on .M. - Traffic on Pacific 60.0-66.4 59.8 -60.5 the eastern portion of the project site. 12:00 A.M. Coast Highway Located approximately 180 feet north Ambient and of the southern property line on the 4:00 P.M. - L3 Traffic on Pacific 58.8 -60.1 58.9 -59.1 southeastern portion of the project 12:00 A.M. Coast Highway site. 'Noise measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc.on October 28,2011. 2 See Exhibit 5-A for the location of the monitoring sites,and Appendix 5.1 for Study Area Photos. 'he long-term noise level measurements printouts are included in Appendix 5.2. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAri City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CROSSROADS 18 Table 5-2 Long-Term (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements' Saturday, October 29th, 2011 Daytime Hourly Nighttime Hourly Observer Time Of Primary Noise Noise Levels Noise Levels Location Description Measurement Source (Leq dBA)3 (Leq dBA)3 Located aproximately 70 feet south of Ambient and L1 the Walnut Avenue centerline on the 24 Hours Traffic on Walnut 57.8 -61.9 53.5 - 58.8 northeast portion of the project site. Avenue Located aproximately 150 feet south Ambient and L2 of the Walnut Avenue centerline on 24 Hours Traffic on Pacific 56.9 -63.1 56.3 - 59.9 the eastern portion of the project site. Coast Highway Located approximately 180 feet north Ambient and of the southern property line on the L3 southeastern portion of the project 24 Hours Traffic on Pacific 57.9-59.8 56.9 - 58.7 Coast Highway site. Noise measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc.on October 29,2011. 2 See Exhibit 5-A for the location of the monitoring sites,and Appendix 5.1 for Study Area Photos. long-term noise level measurements printouts are included in Appendix 5.2. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAri City of Huntington Beach, CA (M07984-05) CRossRosaos 19 Table 5-3 Long-Term (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements' Sunday, October 30th, 2011 Daytime Hourly Nighttime Hourly Observer Time Of Primary Noise Noise Levels Noise Levels Location Description Measurement Source (Leq dBA)3 (Leq dBA)3 Located aproximately 70 feet south of Ambient and L1 the Walnut Avenue centerline on the 24 Hours Traffic on Walnut 56.0 -60.3 52.6 -59.4 northeast portion of the project site. Avenue Located aproximately 150 feet south Ambient and L2 of the Walnut Avenue centerline on 24 Hours Traffic on Pacific 56.0 -63.6 55.4-60.3 the eastern portion of the project site. Coast Highway Located approximately 180 feet north Ambient and of the southern property line on the L3 southeastern portion of the project 24 Hours Traffic on Pacific 57.7-60.2 56.9 -58.4 site. Coast Highway 'Noise measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc.on October 30,2011. 2 See Exhibit 5-A for the location of the monitoring sites,and Appendix 5.1 for Study Area Photos. 'he long-term noise level measurements printouts are included in Appendix 5.2. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAM City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CRo55R0P^0S 20 Table 5-4 Long-Term (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements' Monday, October 31th, 2011 Daytime Hourly Nighttime Hourly Observer Time Of Primary Noise Noise Levels Noise Levels Location Description Measurement Source (Leq dBA)3 (Leq dBA)3 Located aproximately 70 feet south of Ambient and L1 the Walnut Avenue centerline on the 12:00 A.M. - Traffic on Walnut 56.1 -62.7 52.0- 54.4 northeast portion of the project site. 3:00 P.M. Avenue Located aproximately 150 feet south Ambient and L2 of the Walnut Avenue centerline on 12:00 A.M. - Traffic on Pacific 59.3 -63.6 55.8-57.6 the eastern portion of the project site. 3:00 P.M. Coast Highway Located approximately 180 feet north Ambient and of the southern property line on the 12:00 A.M. - L3 Traffic on Pacific 57.5-58.9 56.0-57.0 southeastern portion of the project 3:00 P.M. Coast Highway site. 'Noise measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc.on October 31,2011. 2 See Exhibit 5-A for the location of the monitoring sites,and Appendix 5.1 for Study Area Photos. -he long-term noise level measurements printouts are included in Appendix 5.2. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURAM City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CRossRosaos 21 Table 5-5 Existing Short-Term (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements' Measurement Projected Hourly Observer Time Of Primary Noise Noise Level Noise Levels (dBA Location Description Measurement3 Source (Leq dBA) Leq)4 Located 100 feet from the S1 Pacific Coast Highway 3:36 PM Traffic on Pacific 65.6 61.3-69.7 centerline on the southern Coast Highway portion of the project site. Noise measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc.on October 31,2011. 2 See Exhibit 5-A for monitoring site locations,Appendix 5.1 for Study Area Photos, and Appendix 5.2 for Noise Monitoring Printouts. 3 Measurement at location S1 was monitored for a period of 10 minutes. 4 Mprojected hourly nosie level were calculated comparing the short-term noise measurement,S1,to the long-term noise measurement, L1. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CROSSROADS 22 hourly noise levels were calculated at noise measurement location, S1, by comparing the measured noise level to the closest long-term measurement location, L1. The projected hourly noise levels range from 61.3 to 69.7 dBA Leq. Appendix 5.3 presents the measured Leq to hourly noise level conversion printouts. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ��URBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) CF2ossRoaos 23 6.0OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS To assess the off-site noise level impacts associated with improvements to the Pierside Pavilion Development, noise contours were developed based on the Traffic Impact Analysis. Noise contours were developed for the following traffic scenarios: Existing Year (2011): This scenario refers to the existing present-day noise conditions, without construction of the proposed project. Year (2020) With / Without Project: This scenario refers to the background noise conditions at future Year 2020 with and without the proposed project. This scenario corresponds to 2020 conditions with the project, and includes all cumulative projects identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis. The following section outlines the methods and procedures used to model and analyze the future traffic noise environment. 6.1 FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model The projected roadway noise impacts from vehicular traffic were projected using a computer program that replicates the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model- FHWA-RD-77-108 (the "FHWA Model'). The FHWA Model arrives at a predicted noise level through a series of adjustments to the Reference Energy Mean Emission Level (REMEL). The adjustments made to the REMEL account for: the roadway classification (e.g., collector, secondary, major or arterial), the roadway active width (i.e., the distance between the center of the outermost travel lanes on each side of the roadway), the total average daily traffic (ADT), the travel speed, the percentages of automobiles, medium trucks, and heavy trucks in the traffic volume, the roadway grade, the angle of view (e.g., whether the roadway view is blocked), the site conditions ("hard" or "soft" relates to the absorption of the ground, pavement, or landscaping), and the percentage of total ADT which flows each hour throughout a 24-hour period. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) crzossRAN 24 6.2 Traffic Noise Prediction Model Inputs Table 6-1 presents the FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model roadway parameters used in this analysis. Soft site conditions were used to develop the noise contours to analyze the traffic noise impacts to the study area to take into account the varying ground surface types between the roadways and receiver locations. The average daily traffic volumes used for this study are presented in Table 6-2 were provided by the Pierside Pavilion Improvements Traffic Impact Analysis completed by Minagar & Associates, Inc. in September 2011. Table 6-3 presents the hourly traffic flow distributions (vehicle mix) including the percentages of automobile, medium trucks and heavy trucks for input into the FHWA Model used for this analysis. 6.3 Traffic Noise Contours Noise contours represent the distance to noise levels of a constant value and are measured from the center of the roadway. CNEL noise contours are determined below for the 55, 60, 65 and 70 dBA noise levels. The distance from the centerline of the roadway to the CNEL contours for roadways in the proposed project's vicinity are presented in Tables 6-4 through 6-6. The purpose of the off-site noise contours is to assess the incremental off-site transportation related noise impacts at land uses adjacent to roadways conveying project traffic. The noise contours conservatively do not take into account the effect of any existing noise barriers or topography that may affect ambient noise levels. In addition, in that the noise contours reflect modeling of vehicular noise along area roadways, they appropriately do not reflect noise contribution from the surrounding commercial uses. 6.4 Existing Roadway Noise Levels Table 6-4 presents the existing noise contours. Most of the off-site study area is currently developed with commercial, residential and mixed uses. Table 6-4 shows that the unmitigated exterior noise levels along Pacific Coast Highway currently exceed the City of Huntington Beach 65 dBA CNEL exterior baseline compatibility standard for residential uses at 100 feet from each Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis UI�.�■■�� City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.07984-05 Report) V o�ssRo.wos 25 Table 6-1 Off-Site Roadway Parameters Vehicle Speed Site Roadway Segment Roadway Classification' (MPH) Conditions Pacific Coast Highway w/o Main St. Primary Arterial Street 45 Soft Pacific Coast Highway e/o Main St. Primary Arterial Street 45 Soft Main Street P.C.H. to Walnut Ave. Secondary Arterial Street 40 Soft Main Street n/o Walnut Ave. Secondary Arterial Street 40 Soft Walnut Avenue w/o Main St. Secondary Arterial Street 40 Soft Walnut Avenue Main St. to Third St. Secondary Arterial Street 40 Soft Walnut Avenue e/o Third St. Secondary Arterial Street 40 Soft Third Street n/o Main St. Secondary Arterial Street 40 Soft 'According to the City of Huntington Beach General Plan Circulation Element. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OUR13AIV City of Huntington Beach, CA (M07984-05) CRossRos+.os 26 Table 6-2 Average Daily Traffic For Existing And Year 2020 Conditions Average Daily Traffic(1,000's) Year 2020 Roadway Segment Existing No Project With Project Pacific Coast Highway w/o Main St. 26.0 33.3 33.6 Pacific Coast Highway e/o Main St. 26.1 33.4 33.6 Main Street P.C.H. to Walnut Ave. 2.3 2.7 3.2 Main Street n/o Walnut Ave. 1.2 1.7 1.8 Walnut Avenue w/o Main St. 2.6 4.1 4.1 Walnut Avenue Main St. to Third St. 2.2 3.4 4.0 Walnut Avenue e/o Third St. 1.4 2.1 2.3 Third Street In/o Main St. 0.9 1.5 1.9 Traffic volumes according to the traffic Study for Pierside Pavillion Improvements Project by Minagar&Associates, Inc. on September 27,2011. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CROSSROADS 27 Table 6-3 Hourly Traffic Flow Distribution Daytime Evening Night Total % Motor-Vehicle Type (7 am to 7 pm) (7 pm to 10 pm) (10 pm to 7 am) Traffic Flow Automobiles 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Typical Southern California vehicle mix. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OUR13AIV City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) GROSSROAOS 28 Table 6-4 Existing Conditions Noise Contours CNEL at Distance to Contour(Feet) 100 Feet 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Road Segment dBA 2 CNEL CNEL CNEL CNEL Pacific Coast Highway w/o Main St. 65.8 RW 125 269 579 Pacific Coast Highway e/o Main St. 65.8 RW 125 269 580 Main Street P.C.H. to Walnut Ave. 53.7 RW RW 42 90 Main Street n/o Walnut Ave. 50.9 RW RW RW 58 Walnut Avenue w/o Main St. 54.2 RW RW 45 98 Walnut Avenue Main St. to Third St. 53.5 RW RW 41 87 Walnut Avenue e/o Third St. 51.5 RW RW RW 65 Third Street n/o Main St. 49.6 RW RW RW 48 "RW"= Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road 2 Rnld numbers indicated noise level impacts that exceed Noise Element Policy N 1.2.2. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) cRossRosaos 29 Table 6-5 Year 2020 Without Project Conditions Noise Contours Distance to Contour(Feet) CNEL at 100 Feet 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Road Segment dBA CNEL CNEL CNEL CNEL Pacific Coast Highway w/o Main St. 66.9 68 147 317 682 Pacific Coast Highway e/o Main St. 66.9 68 147 317 684 Main Street P.C.H. to Walnut Ave. 54.4 RW RW 46 100 Main Street n/o Walnut Ave. 52.4 RW RW RW 73 Walnut Avenue w/o Main St. 56.2 RW RW 61 132 Walnut Avenue Main St. to Third St. 55.4 RW RW 54 117 Walnut Avenue e/o Third St. 53.3 RW RW RW 85 Third Street n/o Main St. 51.8 RW RW RW 68 '"RW"= Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road 2 RnId numbers indicated noise level impacts that exceed Noise Element Policy N 1.2.2. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAM City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) cRoSSRosaOs 30 Table 6-6 Year 2020 With Project Conditions Noise Contours Distance to Contour(Feet) CNEL at 100 Feet 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Road Segment dBA CNEL CNEL CNEL CNEL Pacific Coast Highway w/o Main St. 66.9 69 148 319 686 Pacific Coast Highway e/o Main St. 66.9 69 148 319 686 Main Street P.C.H. to Walnut Ave. 55.1 RW RW 52 112 Main Street n/o Walnut Ave. 52.6 RW RW RW 76 Walnut Avenue w/o Main St. 56.2 RW RW 61 132 Walnut Avenue Main St. to Third St. 56.1 RW RW 60 130 Walnut Avenue e/o Third St. 53.7 RW RW 42 90 Third Street n/o Main St. 52.9 RW RW RW 79 "RW"= Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road 2 Rold numbers indicated noise level impacts that exceed Noise Element Policy N 1.2.2. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CRO55ROA1:)�5 31 roadway's centerline. For all other segments analyzed, the existing noise contours at 100 feet from roadway centerline are below 65 dBA CNEL. 6.5 Future Conditions Roadway Noise Levels Tables 6-5 and 6-6 present the Year 2020 without and with project noise contours. Tables 6-5 and 6-6 suggest that the noise level increases on the study area roadway segments are primarily the result of other cumulative development projects and regional growth expressed in the without project conditions noise contours. For reference purposes, the CNEL level at a distance of 100 feet from the highway centerline is also included in the tables mentioned above. The off-site FHWA model printouts are included in Appendix 6.1. Project contributions are discussed in the following sections. 6.6 Year 2020 Project Traffic Noise Level Contributions Table 6-7 presents a comparison of the Year 2020 with and without project noise levels shown in Tables 6-5 and 6-6. The roadway noise impacts will increase by 0.0 dBA CNEL to 1.1 dBA CNEL with the development of the proposed project. 6.7 Off-Site Transportation Related Project Noise Impacts To be considered a substantial noise impact, the off-site project traffic must either cause an exceedance of the local jurisdiction's exterior noise threshold; or, if ambient conditions exceed the jurisdiction's Standards guideline, project traffic must create a "barely perceptible" 3.0 dBA or greater permanent increase in ambient exterior noise levels. Table 6-7 shows that for the Year 2020 analysis, the development of the proposed project will increase the off-site noise levels by up to 1.1 dBA CNEL. An increase of less than 3.0 dBA CNEL is not considered substantial in terms of community noise impacts. Therefore, the proposed project's contributions to off-site roadway noise level increases will not cause any significant impacts to any existing or future sensitive noise receptors. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis City of Huntington Beach, CA(M-07984-05 Report) CROSSROADS 32 Table 6-7 Year 2020 Off-Site Project Related Traffic Noise Impacts CNEL at 100 Feet(dBA) Potential No With Project Significant Roadway Segment Project Project Contribution Impact? Pacific Coast Highway w/o Main St. 66.9 66.9 0.0 NO Pacific Coast Highway e/o Main St. 66.9 66.9 0.0 NO Main Street P.C.H. to Walnut Ave. 54.4 55.1 0.7 NO Main Street n/o Walnut Ave. 52.4 52.6 0.2 NO Walnut Avenue w/o Main St. 56.2 56.2 0.0 NO Walnut Avenue Main St. to Third St. 55.4 56.1 0.7 NO Walnut Avenue e/o Third St. 53.3 53.7 0.4 NO Third Street in/o Main St. 51.8 52.9 1.1 NO A significant impact is considered both a level above 60 dBA CNEL and an increase greater than 3.0 dBA. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis UPJ City of Huntington Beach, CA (M07984-05) CROSSRosaE)S 33 In summary, the project will not generate a substantial permanent increase in transportation-related noise levels, nor cause exposure of persons to noise levels in excess of the standards established in the City of Huntington Beach Noise Element. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ��URB City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) CRossRoA.OS 34 7.0 OFF®SITE OPERATIONAL ACTIVITY RELATED NOISE IMPACTS This section analyzes the potential off-site operational noise impacts resulting from the proposed improvements to the Pierside Pavilion development. The area in which the Pierside Pavilion is located consists mainly of commercial uses including shops, restaurants, and bars. Given the proximity of the Pierside Pavilion to the City of Huntington Beach, there is a considerable amount of noise generated by pedestrian activity while walking to the various other commercial uses as well as the beach. The uses within both the existing and proposed Pierside Pavilion are consistent with those identified in the City of Huntington Beach Downtown Specific Plan. 7.1 Proiect Related Stationary Source Noise The stationary noise impacts associated with the proposed project include the second floor restaurant terrace activities, the roof terrace activities and the roof-top air conditioners. Existing noise sensitive residential uses are located east of the new restaurant space on the southeastern portion of the project site. 7.2 Reference Noise Level Impacts This section provides a detailed description of the reference noise level measurement results shown on Table 7-1. It is important to note that the following projected noise levels assume the worst-case noise environment with the roof-top air conditioners operating continuously. In reality, these noise level impacts will vary throughout the day. The stationary noise source locations expected on the project site are shown on Exhibit 7-A. 7.2.1 Second Floor Restaurant Terrace and Roof Terrace Activities In order to evaluate the noise impacts associated with the second floor restaurant terrace and roof terrace activities, reference noise level measurements were taken by Urban Crossroads Inc. on January 25th, 2002 at an existing Yard House restaurant in the City of Rancho Mirage with outdoor seating. The primary noise generated by outdoor restaurant terrace uses include music from the patio sound system, loud talking and general restaurant activities. The unmitigated noise level was measured at 63.6 dBA Leq at a distance of 20 feet from the restaurant patio area. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBANCity of Huntington Beach,CA(JN:07984-05 Report) 35 Table 7-1 Reference Noise Level Measurements Drop-Off Duration Distance From Noise Source Rate Noise Level Noise Source (mm:ss) Source (Feet) Height(Feet) (Leq dBA) (Leq dBA) Restaurant 60:00 20.0 8.0 6.0 77.3 Terrace Activities' Air Conditioning 2:00 100.0 3.0 6.0 51.8 Units2 'As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 1/25/02. 2 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 5/29/2001 3 Noise level (dBA)drop-off rate per doubling of distance. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CRossRoskos 36 EXHIBIT 7-A OPERATIONAL NOISE IMPACTS .. .KITCHEN RESTAURMIT J. I',sSTOREFROP}7`WIHDOW - P �11',%k - - - til x_ t ;° ,ia � p X. . q a aw ,i. .. 2 .. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OUR13AIV City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN-07984:003.dwg) crtossRC>^DS 37 7.2.2 Air Conditioning Units In order to assess the impacts created by the roof-top air conditioning units at the planned project site, reference noise levels were gathered from the Albertson's Shopping Center in Ladera Ranch, CA by Urban Crossroads Inc. on May 29th, 2001. The unmitigated exterior noise levels were measured at 51.8 dBA Leq at a distance of 100 feet from the air- conditioning units. 7.3 Project Only Stationary Source Noise Impacts Based upon the reference noise levels provided on Table 7-1, it is possible to project noise levels from the proposed Pierside Pavilion to the adjacent noise-sensitive uses. The noise level projections were calculated based on the site plan showing the spatial relationship between the potential on-site noise sources and the noise receptor locations. Table 7-2 presents the expected noise level impacts associated with the proposed Pierside Pavilion Improvements commercial center to the neighboring noise receptor locations surrounding the project site. The stationary source noise level projections include the second floor restaurant terrace activities, roof terrace activities and roof-top air conditioners. The unmitigated noise level impacts associated with the operation of the proposed project site are expected to reach 63.2 dBA Leq. With the planned noise mitigation measures, the project only noise levels are expected to reach 54.4 dBA Leq. As shown on the project site plan and on Table 7-2, the planned noise mitigation measures includes a %" thick 6-foot high plexi-glass for the second floor restaurant, and a 5-foot high parapet wall surrounding the rooftop air conditioning units. In addition, the roof terrace will be separated from the neighboring residential units with a 13.5-foot high mechanical ventilation room. With the proposed noise barriers, the project only noise levels at the adjacent receptor are expected to reach 54.4 dBA Leq. The stationary source noise prediction calculations are included in Appendix 7.1. 7.4 Stationary Source Project Noise Level Impacts To assess the operational related noise level impacts, the stationary source noise level projections generated by the project were compared to standards established in the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance as well as the significance criteria presented in Section 4.3 of this report. In order to assess the level of significance, the existing ambient noise level measurements were combined Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ��� � City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.-07984-05 Report) CR055ROA05 38 Table 7-2 Project Only Stationary Source Impact Noise Level Projections Distance From Source To Unmitigated Barrier Mitigated Receptor Receptor Noise Level Attenuation Noise Level Location' Noise Source (Feet) (Leq dBA) (Leq dBA) Barrier Type (Leq dBA) Restaurant Flloor Terrace 40' 57.6 -7.9 6' Terrace Wall 49.7 Neighboring Roof Terrace 40' 57.6 -16.1 13.5' Mechanical 41.5 Residential Ventilation Room Air Conditioning 40' 59.8 -7.6 5' Parrapet Wall 52.2 Overall Unmittigated Noise Level: 63.2 54.4 ' See Exhibit 6-A for the noise receptor locations. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact AnalysisLAY URB AM City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) cFcossrzosaos 39 with the stationary source noise level projections generated by the project. Though it assumed that the future restaurant with outdoor terrace uses will close prior to 2 a.m., the noise level projections we compared to the quietest daytime and nighttime noise hours. Tables 7-3 and 7-4 shows that the daytime and nighttime project noise level contributions will range from 0.4 to 0.8 dBA Leq when compared with the quietest daytime and nighttime hours. The noise level impacts will contribute less than 3.0 dBA to the existing residential uses, and, therefore, the proposed project will not create a significant noise impact to the surrounding receptors. In addition, the project only noise level impacts will not exceed the existing ambient noise levels which according to the City of Huntington Beach Noise Ordinance becomes the standard (8.40.060). Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ���w� City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.07984-05 Report) CROSSROADS 40 Table 7-3 Daytime (7 a.m.to 10 p.m.) Project Noise Contributions Exterior Noise Level Receptor Location Condition (dBA Leq) Project Only Impact Noise Total 54.4 Neighboring Existing Ambient Noise Level 64.4 Residential Combined Project&Ambient Noise Level 64.8 Project Contribution 0.4 Existing ambient noise level coincides with lowest daytime noise level recorded at nearest noise monitoring location. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OUR13AN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CROSSROADS 41 Table 7-4 Nighttime (10 p.m.to 7 a.m.) Project Noise Contributions Exterior Noise Level Receptor Location Condition (dBA Leq) Project Only Impact Noise Total 54.4 Neighboring Existing Ambient Noise Level 61.3 Residential Combined Project&Ambient Noise Level 62.1 Project Contribution 0.8 ' Existing ambient noise level coincides with lowest daytime noise level recorded at nearest noise monitoring location. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CRossRoA.os 42 8.0 OFF-SITE CONSTRUCTION RELATE® NOISE IMPACTS Construction noise represents a short-term impact on the ambient noise levels. Noise generated by construction equipment, including trucks, power tools, concrete mixers and portable generators can reach high levels. As mentioned in Section 4.0 of this analysis, the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code exempts noise impacts from construction related activities that occur within the applicable noise hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays. The following construction noise impact analysis was completed to determine the expected noise levels at the surrounding land uses. 8.1 Construction Activities Project construction is expected to consist of multiple phases including, demolition, site preparation, physical building improvements, and architectural coatings. For noise impact purposes, calculations were performed during each phase when activities are closest to the eastern property line. 8.2 Construction Noise Levels In January 2006, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published a national database of construction equipment reference noise emission levels. The database, as shown in Appendix 8.1, provides a comprehensive list of the noise generating characteristics for specific types of construction equipment. In addition, the database provides an acoustical usage factor to estimate the fraction of time each piece of construction equipment is operating at full power (i.e., its loudest condition) during a construction operation. Noise levels generated by heavy construction equipment can range from approximately 70 dBA to noise levels in excess of 100 dBA when measured at 50 feet. However, these noise levels diminish with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance. For example, a noise level of 78 dBA measured at 50 feet from the noise source to the receptor would be reduced to 72 dBA at 100 feet from the source to the receptor, and would be further reduced to 66 dBA at 200 feet from the source to the receptor. The location of the nearest noise receptors are shown in Exhibit 8-A while noise levels generated during each phase are summarized below. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.•07984-05 Report) GROSSROAOS 43 EXHIBIT 8-A TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS NOISE LEVEL (dBA) AT 50 FEET 60 70 80 90 100 w Compactors (Rollers) z (D Front Loaders z z Backhoes z Z 0 0 cn Tractors oW Scrapers, Graders QPavers cc Trucks w z m Z Concrete Mixers J WConcrete Pumps o I Cranes (Movable) W z z Cranes (Derrick) w a Pumps oil w o Generators a U) Compressors Pneumatic Wrenches � w aa Jack Hammers, Rock Drills Pile Drivers (Peak) w cc Vibrators w o Saws NOTE:Based on limited available data samples. SOURCE.United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1971, "Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment,and Home Appliances,"NTID 300-1. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OUR13AN City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN-07984:002.dwg) 44 8.2.1 Demolition Activities Table 8-1 shows that during demolition activities, noise levels at the adjacent residences are expected to reach 81.9 dBA Leq when activities occur at the closest portion of the construction area. 8.2.2 Site Preparation Activities Table 8-2 shows that during the site preparation phase, noise levels at the adjacent residences are expected to reach 89.1 dBA Leq when activities occur at the closest portion of the construction area. 8.2.3 Physical Building Improvements Table 8-3 shows that during physical building improvements, noise levels at the adjacent residences are expected to reach 76.1 dBA Leq when activities occur at the closest portion of the construction area. 8.2.4 Architectural Coating Activities Table 8-4 shows that during architectural coating activities, noise levels at the adjacent residences are expected to reach 84.6 dBA Leq when activities occur at the closest portion of the construction area. 8.3 Construction Noise Impacts Under Section 8.40.090(d) (Special Provisions) of Chapter 8.40 of the City's Municipal Code, noise sources associated with construction are exempt from the requirements of the Municipal Code, provided that the project developer has acquired the proper permit(s) from the City and construction activities do not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. In addition to the City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code, the project will also comply with MM 4.8-1 of the City of Huntington Beach Downtown Specific Plan EIR mitigation measures. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURC)R13ANCity of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.•07984-05 Report) cssa 45 Table 8-1 Demolition Construction Noise Levels' Usage Hours Of Reference Noise Level @ Cumulative Level @ Equipment Type Quantity Factor2 Operation 50 Feet(dBA) 50 Feet(dBA) Tractor/Loader/Backhoe 3 40% 3.2 78.0 78.8 Cumulative Noise Levels 50 Feet(dBA) 78.8 Noise Reduction Distance To Due To Distance Noise Reduction Due To Construction Noise Receiver Location Residents (In Feet)5 (dBA) Temporary Barrier(dBA) Level (dBA) Eastern Property Line 35 3.1 0.0 81.9 Source: FHWA's Roadway Construction Noise Model,January 2006. 2 Estimates the fraction of time each piece of equipment is operating at full power during a construction operation. 3 Represents the actual hours of peak construction equipment activity out of a typical 8 hour workday. 4 Receiver locations are presented on Exhibit 8-A 5 Distance from the nearest point of construction activity to the nearest receiver. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CROSSROADS 46 Table 8-2 Site Preparation Noise Levels' Re Terence Noise Usage Hours Of Level @ 50 Feet Cumulative Level @ Equipment Type Quantity Factor2 Operation (dBA) 50 Feet(dBA) Grader 1 40% 3.2 89.0 85.0 Tractor/Loader/Backhoe 2 40% 3.2 80.0 79.0 Cumulative Noise Levels 50 Feet(dBA) 86.0 Noise Reduction Due To Distance To Property Due To Distance Temporary Barrier Construction Noise Receiver Location Line (In Feet)5 (dBA) (dBA) Level (dBA) Eastern Property Line 35 3.1 0.0 89.1 ' Source: FHWA's Roadway Construction Noise Model,January 2006. 2 Estimates the fraction of time each piece of equipment is operating at full power during a construction operation. 3 Represents the actual hours of peak construction equipment activity out of a typical 8 hour workday. 4 Distance from the nearest point of construction activity to the nearest receiver. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CROSSROADS 47 Table 8-3 Physical Building Improvements Noise Levels' Reference Noise Usage Hours Of Level @ 50 Feet Cumulative Level @ Equipment Type Quantity Factorz Operation (dBA) 50 Feet(dBA) Crane 1 16% 1.3 81.0 73.0 Cumulative Noise Levels 50 Feet(dBA) 73.0 Noise Reduction Due To Distance To Property Due To Distance Temporary Barrier Construction Noise Receiver Location Line (in Feet)5 (dBA) (dBA) Level (dBA) Eastern Property Line 35 3.1 0.0 76.1 1 Source: FHWA's Roadway Construction Noise Model,January 2006. 2 Estimates the fraction of time each piece of equipment is operating at full power during a construction operation. 3 Represents the actual hours of peak construction equipment activity out of a typical 8 hour workday. 4 Distance from the nearest point of construction activity to the nearest receiver. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis U�U RAN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CROSSROADS 48 Table 8-4 Architectural Coatings Construction Noise Levels' Usage Hours Of Reference Noise Level Cumulative Level Equipment Type Quantity Factor2 Operation @ 50 Feet(dBA) @ 50 Feet(dBA) Aerial Lifts 1 20% 1.6 85.0 78.0 Air Compressor 1 50% 4.0 82.0 79.0 Cumulative Noise Levels 50 Feet(dBA) 81.5 Distance To Reduction Due Noise Reduction Due Property Line (In To Distance To Temporary Barrier Construction Noise Receiver Location Feet)5 (dBA) (dBA) Level (dBA) Eastern Property Line 35 3.1 0.0 84.6 ' Source: FHWA's Roadway Construction Noise Model,January 2006. 2 Estimates the fraction of time each piece of equipment is operating at full power during a construction operation. 3 Represents the actual hours of peak construction equipment activity out of a typical 8 hour workday. 4 Receiver locations are presented on Exhibit 8-A 5 Distance from the nearest point of construction activity to the nearest receiver. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ���RBAN City of Huntington Beach, CA (JN:07984-05) CROSSROADS 49 • Noise attenuation devices shall be used on all construction equipment, and construction staging areas shall be located as far as possible from any residences or other noise sensitive receptors. In addition to the required mitigation measures above, the following practices are recommended in order to reduce noise level impacts during construction activities. • Ensure that construction equipment is properly muffled according to industry standards and be in good working condition. • Schedule high noise-producing activities between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. to minimize disruption on sensitive uses, Monday through Saturday. • Implement noise attenuation measures, which may include, but are not limited to, temporary noise barriers or noise blankets around stationary construction noise sources. • Use electric air compressors and similar power tools rather than diesel equipment, where feasible. • Construction related equipment, including heavy duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than 10 minutes. • Construction hours, allowable workdays, and the phone number of the job superintendent shall be clearly posted at all construction entrances to allow for surrounding owners and residents to contact the job superintendent. If the City or the job superintendent receives a complaint, the superintendent shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action taken to the reporting party. Construction noise is temporary, intermittent and of short duration, and will not present any long-term impacts. While the noise level impacts presented for each Phase are a "worst-case" scenario and may at times be audible over existing traffic related noise level impacts shown in Section 6.0, these levels are not expected to be of a continuous nature. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ��u�� City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-05 Report) CRossRC)^OS 50 8.4 Construction Vibration Impacts Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. Construction vibration is generally associated with pile driving and rock blasting. Occasionally large bulldozers and loaded trucks can cause perceptible vibration levels at close proximity. According to the Transportation and Construction-Induced Vibration Guidance Manual prepared for Caltrans, ground-borne vibration from construction activities and equipment such as such as D-8 and D-9 Caterpillars bulldozers, earthmovers and haul trucks at distances of 10 feet do not create vibration amplitudes that causes structural damage to nearby structures. Since the proposed Project is not expected to employ any pile driving, rock blasting or heaving grading equipment and with residential uses located greater than 10 feet from construction activities, impacts from groundborne vibration are anticipated to be less-than-significant. Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ®®���� City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN.•07984-05 Report) C URBAN 51 APPENDIX 4.1 City of Huntington Beach Noise Element Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis L4 URBAN City of Huntington Beach,CA(JN.07984-03 Report.doc) CRoss RC3^DS T-TOVAR NOIDN-Ilmf -6. tvw. r' H HAZARDS CHAPTER NoisE EL 1NENT STAIUTORY REQUIREMENTS Government Code Section 65302(f)states the following: The General Plan shall include a noise element which shall identify and appraise noise problems in the community. The noise element shall recognize the guidelines adopted by the Office of Noise Control in the State Department of Health Services and shall analyze and quantify to the extent practicable, as determined by the legislative body; current and projected noise levels for all of thefollowing sources: 1) Highways and freeways; 2) Primary arterials and major local streets; 3) Passenger and freight on-line railroad operations and ground rapid transit - systems; 4) Aviation and airport related operations; 5) Other ground stationary noise sources contributing to community noise environment. A local noise element should accurately reflect the noise environment,the stationary sources of noise, and the impacts of noise on local residents. TECHNICAL SYNOPSIS A. NOISE SOURCES Noise is often defined as"unwanted sound"because of its potential to disrupt sleep,to interfere with speech communication, and to damage hearing. Noise is generated by interior and exterior sources, which can include mobile and stationary sources. Interior noise is generally stationary and includes devices and machines such as stereos and televisions. Exterior noise can be both mobile and stationary and is generated by motor vehicles,aircraft operations, construction work, industrial operations, and human activities. The primary noise source within the City of Huntington Beach is vehicular traffic. Secondary noise sources include aircraft operations,railroad operations,construction and petroleum extraction activities. 1. Vehicular Operations Vehicular traffic noise is the most pervasive source of noise throughout the City. Traffic noise is generally attributed to all types of vehicles, including automobiles, buses, trucks and construction equipment transport. _ THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-1 4.1-2 HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISE ELEMENT 2. Aircraft Operations a. Airport While there are no operating airports located within Huntington Beach, and no airplane flight patterns for .either the Long Beach Municipal Airport or the John Wayne Airport over the City of Huntington Beach (Federal Aviation Administration, Burgen, 1992), it is not uncommon for airplanes to fly over the City during their approach to either of the two airports. Such variations in airplane approach patterns can be attributed to inclement weather and delays created by the large number of commercial and private flights accommodated by these airports each day. During such approach flights to the Long Beach Municipal Airport, airplanes typically fly over downtown Huntington Beach, areas east of the Bolsa Chica wetlands, and the Huntington Harbour,at altitudes ranging from 1,500 to 4,000 feet. Similar approach flights to the John Wayne Airport fly over the southeastern most portion of the City at an altitude of approximately 5,000 feet (Burgen, 1992). During the warmer months small aircraft frequently fly back and forth along the Huntington Beach and State beaches and over Huntington Harbour. - b. Heliport The five heliports are located at McDonnell Douglas Corporation (Bolsa Chica Street at Bolsa Avenue), Guardian Center (Beach Boulevard at Warner Avenue), Police Station at Goldenwest Street and Talbert Avenue, Cal Resources at Pacific Coast Highway (between Seapoint Street and Warner Avenue), and the Civic Center (Main Street at Yorktown Avenue). With the exception of the Huntington Beach Police Department's helicopters, helicopter flights are typically located above the major and primary arterials as well as the 405 Freeway. Although single-event noise exposure resulting from airplane and helicopter operations are potentially annoying, the relatively low frequency and short duration of these operations do not significantly affect average daily noise levels within the City. 3. Railroad Operations Another source of noise within the City is the Southern Pacific Railroad and the U.S.Navy Railroad. The Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, located east ofGothard Street, extends 3.5 miles from the northern portion of the City to its terminus, located north of Ellis Avenue. The U.S.Navy Railroad originates at the U.S.Naval Weapons Station and travels eastward through the northernmost portion of Huntington Beach for approximately one mile. Within Huntington Beach,the Southern Pacific Railroad is used once daily and the U.S.Navy freight trains rarely travel outside the Naval Weapons Station. 4. Petroleum Extraction Activities Petroleum extraction from the Huntington Beach Oil Field is a source of noise within the City. The Huntington Beach Oil Field is anticipated to remain active for another 15-30 years. Aminoil,USA, SWEPI, and Chevron,USA are the primary oil companies that extract oil from this area. Located within Huntington Beach are Aminoil, USA's separation treatment and storage facilities, Chevron, USA's oil extraction facilities,and various independent oil companies'"oil islands"(isolated oil extraction areas). THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-2 4.1-3 HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISF ELEMENT B. NOISE MEASUREMENT Environmental noise is usually measured in A-weighted decibels (dB). Sound waves, traveling outward from a source exert a sound pressure(commonly called"sound level")measured in decibels. In general,a 3 decibel increase in sound level represents a doubling in sound energy,although it will not be experienced as a doubling of loudness. The average range of sounds that humans are commonly exposed to generally falls within the 30-100 dB range. Environmental noise levels typically fluctuate over time. Different types of noise descriptors are used to account for this variability. For the purpose of this Element,Ldn,the day-night average noise level,is used. C. NOISE CONTROL MEASURES Noise can be controlled a) at its source, b) along its transmission path, c) at the receiver, or d) through a — combination of these measures. Federal and state regulations provide for certain controls on noise sources, such as motor vehicles. The City has adopted additional provisions which restrict the generation of noise within the community. The noise level standards adopted by the City are more stringent than State Office of Noise Control guidelines for residential and commercial noise levels, placing limitations on noise produced by equipment operation, human activities, and construction. As stated in the City's Noise Ordinance(Municipal Code,Chapter 8.40,Noise Control)the Orange County health officer,or a designated agent, which is the City's Code Enforcement Officers, has primary responsibility for the enforcement of these regulations. D. EXISTING NOISE CONDITIONS As discussed previously,the primary source of noise in the City of Huntington Beach is generated by motor vehicles. Average daily traffic flows along arterial corridors within the City were utilized to assess existing noise levels. These noise levels are based on a noise Prediction Model created by the Federal Highway Transportation Administration. Based on the model, average noise levels along arterial segments range from approximately 60 to 68 dB(A) Ldn at 50 feet from curbside, and generally average about 65 dB(A) Ldn. As a rule,existing development along the major arterials in the City include noise-tolerant industrial and commercial (excluding professional office) uses. The noise level along these roadway segments is normally acceptable for industrial level uses. However, the City of Huntington Beach exterior noise standard for commercial uses is exceeded along all major arterial segments where commercial land uses are located within approximately 150 feet of the curb. Land uses along the other arterials include residential,professional office and institutional. These land uses are much more sensitive to high noise levels. Many schools and newer office buildings provide parking areas and noise attenuation barriers (e.g., walls, berms, shrubs) between noise sources and buildings as a method of reducing noise levels. However, older residences, churches and schools do not have adequate setbacks, nor are buildings equipped with interior noise attenuation devices (e.g., double glazed windows). Therefore, all of the land uses located along arterial roadways (excluding industrial uses) are exposed to noise levels that either meet or exceed acceptable City noise standards (]Figure N-1 locates sensitive land uses within the City). THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-3 4.1-4 V � y 0 SEAL (, ® WESTMINSTER BEACH BOLSAI x 3 I '• �• Ma o ® am r EN EDINGER •� ® --• HEIL a • WARNER FOUNTAIN VALL - ----- •SLATER 405 ti '`•� COUNTY OF + •TALBERT o/Fc0` vY ORANGE (BOLSA CHICA) ig `• �` ® f E1LS `� � � a �• o ♦ I_— — PACIFIC ® YORKTOWN Ilk OCEAN �� I ADAMS I I ®1 ® / INDIANAPOLIS ® I ATLANTA PIER HAMILTON LEGEND I BANNING COSTA City Boundary I MESA s ' ® Public School O Hospk ® Institutional(Church,Museum,Private School) NOTE See Figure RCS-1 rot Ibc9=of parr. LOCATION OF NOISE SENSITIVE LAND USES CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN WN54 HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISE ELEMENT ISSUES 1. Some residential, commercial, and institutional land uses in the City of Huntington Beach, particularly along arterial roadways, are impacted by vehicular noise levels exceeding City standards. (N 1.2.1, N 1.2.4, N 1.3.2, N 1.3.3, N 1.3.4, N 1.3.5, N 1.3.6, N 1.3.7, N 1.3.8, and N 1.3.9) 2. There are several developments within the City of Huntington Beach and its sphere of influence that are currently being planned or have been recently approved. These include: Bolsa Chica, Ellis-Golden West,Meadowlark, and Holly-Seacliff. Buildout of these planned developments will increase traffic levels in the vicinity of these developments, resulting in increased noise levels. New development is required to adhere to the standards set forth in the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. (N 1.2.2,N 1.6.1, and N 1.13.1) 3. There are several vacant parcels of land that is surrounded by existing development. There is a - potential for noise generating uses to be developed on these properties. The City should enforce the Infill Ordinance to protect existing uses. (N 1.2.2,N 1.2.3,N 1.4.1,N 1.5.1,N L 7.1, and N THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-5 4.1-6 HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISE ELEMENT GOALS,OBJECTIVES,AND POLICIES Ambient Noise Impacts on the Community The following section presents the goals, objectives, Objective and policies relative to both ambient and stationary N 1.2 fixed-source noise conditions in the City of Huntington Prevent and mitigate the adverse impacts of excessive Beach. At the end of each policy is a reference to the noise exposure on the residents, employees, visitors, appropriate implementation program. Each and noise sensitive uses of Huntington Beach, implementation program's schedule and possible funding sources are indicated in the Noise Policies Implementation Matrix. N 1.2.1 Require, in areas where noise levels exceed an exterior Coal Ldn of 60 dB(A)and an interior Ldn of 45 dB(A),that N 1 all new development of "noise sensitive" land uses, Ensure that all necessary and appropriate actions such as housing,health care facilities,schools, libraries, are taken to protect Huntington Beach residents, and religious facilities, include appropriate buffering employees,visitors,and noise sensitive uses from the and/or construction mitigation measures that will reduce - adverse impacts created by excessive noise levels noise exposure to levels within acceptable limits. (I-N from stationary and ambient sources. 4) Noise Ordinances,Regulations,and N 1.2.2 Guidelines Require new industrial and new commercial land uses or the major expansion of existing land uses to Objective demonstrate that the new or expanded use would not be N 1.1 directly responsible for causing ambient noise levels to Adopt and enforce appropriate local noise ordinances, exceed an exterior Ldn of 65 dB(A)on areas containing regulations, and guidelines to effectively control both noise sensitive' land uses as depicted on Figure N-1. (I-N 4 and I-NS) ambient and stationary noise conditions and impacts. Maintain baseline information regarding the ambient and stationary noise sources on an ongoing basis. N Require development, in all areas where the ambient Policies noise level exceeds an Ldn of 60 dB(A),to conduct an N 1.1.1 acoustical analysis and incorporate special design Monitor and update available data regarding the measures in their construction, thereby, reducing community's existing and projected ambient and interior noise levels to the 45 dB(A) Ldn level (see stationary noise levels as shown on Figure N-2 and Figure N-2). (I-N4) N-3. (IN 1) N 1.2.4 N 1.1.2 Encourage existing "noise sensitive uses," including Update all local noise ordinances, regulations and schools, libraries, health care facilities, and residential guidelines as required by modifications to state uses to incorporate fences, walls, landscaping, and/or standards and guidelines. (I-N2 and I-N3) other noise buffers and barriers,where appropriate and feasible to mitigate noise impacts. (I-N 3 and I-N 4) N 1.1.3 Consider revising the City of Huntington Beach noise N 1.2.5 ordinance to establish acceptable standards for mobile Require development that generates__increased traffic and subsequent increases in the ambient noise levels noise sources(such as,but not limited to, leaf blowers, mobile vendors,mobile stereos,etc.). (I-N 3) adjacent to noise sensitive land uses to provide for appropriate mitigation measures in accordance with the acceptable limits of the City noise ordinance. (1-N 4) THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-6 4.1-7 y, s �rA 4tio,A tad ' rya de Ile ey a ,. . %� .' '�/•r:.` 'i' y:V,A�:� `\� Wya ��.6, ��.yn,' you \.. •:. , i.,, i Sig• ` � � a ' ,r+',:/' 'tom F�'�r✓a;\ it:`\`.,., r, ' \` r�r``'n'. \ � °s+'o, � �':`•J rJ„ . /�� I` :'i..0♦�'60.� � f ��a ,�,`4 jT df'' \'/�'• .1'� .L'.� a;' A �14�=•::r •'6 i:, '!,; ✓_ �•� `` °`o•:vI-\s r,A�� �-`�• ''•( '� /�t:�%��'"''' `i •�'vi,. 'A � '1A4. .���/'.;\,['.;��,� \gal: 10 o �� �� s'ra' � ..a•'i�a' .,�•l7� '�,�.ij f K"\` \•�rw. \'�" a�/.n / ,.•;),�• S `{ S'4 .r•'. .r, I•�p 6 I• a '�� � � � ' i i' •,�'•, w.,,•11,:`y ��', i,§../. ,�a,r \f' y�'r n,,�� � '`\i: i• ,�. ' .Y`!�;'b„ i. ��.��rJJ, `,'a` �• �r`�,'A�"�S:J % �.j' .�n •.Z�� \�', i�, \\`/, �r,'.y!�,, . ,�``' 4 p,�0.1; 'a ya.;Gj:, (', �*�\F1`1y ��^• r� :� h'pa a , 'Fi \fi.\.. iAlr,,��- rl.�J l ` '+/�j� 6✓• 0 .0�� ", .J.'a ���':r. `.�1��11!1i S' `��- ) •!i_d:;f-" `.;t.• - - �'.:_!„� f �;"_ 1 o Il CdUtl!�CIA _ __ ,�'• �ss ou --eo -- - _ i , •_ :1•. 11 , J, Il ;i1s:I�L'' 60 Acres Scale in Feel North Pacific i0ceall _ - so - — xs so o xar ".mo HUNTINGTON BEACH NOISE CONTOURS (1992-dB Ldn) N-2 City of Huntington Beach General Plan HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISE ELEMENT Traffic and Mechanical Equipment Related N 1.3.7 Noise Impacts Provide for the development of alternate transportation modes such as bicycle paths and pedestrian walkways Objective to minimize the number of noise generating automobile N 1.3 trips. (1-N 8) Minimize the adverse impacts of traffic-generated noise on residential and other"noise sensitive"uses. N 1.3.8 Ensure that commercial and industrial uses, as required Policies by the Air Quality Management Plan, implement N 1.3.1 Transportation Demand Management(TDM)programs Require all new non-residential development to design such as incentives for car pooling, van pools, and the and configure on-site ingress and egress points diverting use of public transit. (1-N 8) traffic away from nearby"noise sensitive" land uses to the greatest degree practicable. (1--N 4) N 1.3.9 Alter surface street traffic flow through various methods N 1.3.2 (including but not limited to one way streets,speed limit — Actively enforce existing applicable sections of the reductions, truck and heavy vehicle prohibitions) to California Vehicle Code related to vehicle or equipment maximize steady flow conditions. (I-N 4) mufflers and modified exhaust systems. (I-N 2) N 1.3.10 N 1.3.3 Require that mechanical equipment, such as air Require that any vehicles or noise-generating conditioning units or pool equipment, comply with the mechanical equipment to be purchased by the City of City's Noise Ordinance and Zoning and Subdivision Huntington Beach comply with noise performance Ordinance. (I-N2and1-N4) standards consistent with the best available noise reduction technology. (1-N 6) Noise Impact Encroachment of Commercial and Industrial Land Uses N 1.3.4 Investigate the feasibility of retrofitting currently Objective city-owned vehicles and mechanical equipment to N 1.4 comply with noise performance standards consistent Minimize noise spillover or encroachment from with the best available noise reduction technology. (1-N commercial and industrial land uses into adjoining 6) residential neighborhoods or"noise-sensitive"uses. N 1.3.5 Policies Encourage local and regional public transit providers to N 1.4.1 ensure that the equipment they use and operate does not Require that the automobile and truck access of generate excessive noise impacts on the community. commercial or industrial land uses abutting residential (I-N7) parcels to be located at the maximum practical distance from the nearest residential parcels. (I-N 4) N 1.3.6 Encourage the State of California Department of N 1.4.2 Transportation (Caltrans) to install and maintain Require that the loading and shipping facilities of landscaping or other noise mitigation elements along commercial and industrial land uses abutting residential freeways and highways which are adjacent to existing parcels to be located and designed to minimize the residential or"noise sensitive"uses. (IN 7) potential noise impacts upon residential parcels. (1-N 4) THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-9 4.1-10 HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISE ELEMENT N 1.4.3 Policy Require that the parking areas of all commercial and N 1.6.1 industrial land uses,which abut residential areas, to be Ensure that construction activities be regulated to buffered and shielded by walls, fences, or adequate establish hours of operation,to prevent and/or mitigate landscaping. (1--N4) the generation of excessive or adverse noise impacts through the implementation of the existing Noise N 1.4.4 Ordinance and/or any future revisions to the Noise Require that the parking structures of commercial or Ordinance. (1--N 2 and 1-N 3) industrial land uses be designed to minimize the potential noise impacts of vehicles on the site as well as Noise Impacts/Encroachment Within on adjacent land uses. (1-N4) Multi-Occupant Structures N 1.4.5 Objective Require commercial or industrial truck delivery hours N 1.7 to land uses abutting residential uses to be limited Ensure that buildings are constructed to prevent adverse unless there is no feasible alternative or there are noise transmission between differing uses or tenants overriding transportation benefits. (1--N4) located in the same commercial structure and individual Noise Impacts of Mixed-Use Structures dwelling units in multi-family residential structures. Policy Objective N 1.7.1 N 1.5 Rigorously enforce the applicable provisions of the Minimize the potentially adverse noise impacts Uniform Building Code and City of Huntington Beach associated with the development of mixed-use Municipal Code which prevent the transmission of structures where residential units are located above or excessive and unacceptable noise levels between adjacent to commercial uses. individual tenants and businesses in commercial structures and between individual dwelling units in Policy multi-family residential structures. (1--N4) N 1.5.1 Require that commercial and residential mixed-use ]noise Impacts of Entertainment and structures minimize the transfer or transmission of noise Restaurant/Bar Land Uses and vibration from the commercial land use to the residential land use. The design measures used may include: (1)the use of materials which mitigate sound Objective N transmission; or(2)the configuration of interior spaces ,to minimize sound amplification and transmission. (1- Minimize the generation of excessive noise level LU I1.1.5,1-N 4, and 1-N S) impacts from entertainment and restaurant/bar establishments into adjacent residential or "noise Construction Noise Impacts sensitive"land uses. N 1.8.1 Objective N Require that entertainment and restaurant/bar uses take appropriate steps to control the activities of their patrons Minimize the impacts of construction noise on adjacent on-site, as well as within a reasonable and legally uses• justified distance or proximity, to minimize potential noise-related impacts on adjacent residential neighborhoods. (1--N 4) THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-10 4.1-11 HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISE ELEMENT N 1.8.2 Policies Discourage the development of new nightclubs, N 1.10.1 discotheques, and other high noise-generating Determine if any residential neighborhood or sensitive entertainment uses that may impact residential land use beneath the Long Beach Airport or the John neighborhoods, schools, health care facilities, or other Wayne Airport's flight path is within a CNEL 65 "noise sensitive" land uses, unless it can be contour. (I-N 1) demonstrated that adequate measures can be installed and employed to adequately mitigate the potential N 1.10.2 impacts of on-site operations and/or off-site customer Solicit funding to remedy excessive noise exposure access and activities of these establishments upon these generated by aircraft operations. (I-N 10) areas. (I-N 4) Noise Impacts of Oil Operations Noise Impacts of hail Uses Objective Objective N 1.11 N 1.9 Minimize the effect of oil operations noise on Minimize the noise effect of rail transit (freight and residential and other sensitive land uses. passenger) on residential uses and other sensitive land uses. Policy N 1.11.1 Policy Require that new oil uses near existing residential uses N 1.9.1 or that new residential development near existing oil Coordinate with rail planners to: facilities include noise mitigation measures. (I-N 4) a. locate light rail and fixed rail routes and Analysis And Mitigation of Ci , -Wide locate/design rail stations in areas which are Stationary(Fixed-Source)Noise Impacts accessible to both residential and commercial areas but which also minimize noise impacts Objective on surrounding residential and sensitive land N 1.12 uses; Ensure any use determined (by the City of Huntington b. properly maintain lines and establish Beach) to be a potential generator of significant operational restrictions (e.g., hours of stationary noise impacts, be properly analyzed and operation, speed limits) during the early ensure that the recommended mitigation measures are morning and late evening hours to reduce implemented. adverse noise impacts in residential areas and other noise sensitive areas;and Policies c. install noise mitigation features where N 1.12.1 operations impact existing adjacent residential Require detailed and independent acoustical studies be or other"noise-sensitive"uses. (I-N9) conducted for any new or renovated land uses or structures determined to be potential major stationary Noise Impacts of Aircraft Operations noise sources. Recommended mitigation measures must be successfully implemented and tested, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the land Objective use or structure. (I-N II) N 1.10 - Minimize the effect of aircraft noise on residential and other sensitive land uses. THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-I1 4.1-12 HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISE ELEMENT N 1.12.2 1-N 2 Encourage major stationary noise generating sources Noise Ordinance Enforcement throughout the City of Huntington Beach to install additional noise buffering or reduction mechanisms Continue to enforce the local Noise Ordinance to within their facilities to reduce noise generation levels comply with the State's Noise Insulation Standards. to the lowest extent practicable prior to the renewal of Said ordinance shall contain policies and regulations Conditional Use Permits or business licenses or prior to addressing both overall(ambient) and stationary source the approval and/or issuance of new Conditional Use (intrusive)noise impacts. Ordinance shall also regulate Permits for said facilities. (1-N 4 and I-N 11) and limit high noise generating vehicles,equipment and construction activities to reduce their potential impacts Objective on local noise sensitive uses. N 1.13 Encourage residents in high noise level areas to I-N 3 improve their homes to meet the City's noise standards. Noise Ordinance Revisions Policy Include provisions within the City of Huntington Beach ` N 1.13.1 local Noise Ordinance that: Assist the efforts of local homeowners living in high noise level areas to noise attenuate their homes through a. establish acceptable operating standards such funding assistance and retrofitting program as permitted decibel levels, operating hours, development,as feasible. (1-N 12) etc.for mobile noise sources,if determined by the City Council to be necessary; IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS b. require that noise sensitive uses proposed to be- located in areas with noise levels of 60 dB(A) I-N 1 Ldn or greater include the recommended Noise Environment Data/Studies mitigation measures or demonstrate the interior noise levels will not exceed an Ldn of Require the following as appropriate: 45 dB(A), prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancies and/or certification of a. the developer to conduct or hire acoustical completion; engineers to conduct studies where current c. specifically address and sufficiently regulate or data is not available; limit the hours of truck deliveries to b. the review of available technical and commercial or industrial land uses abutting acoustical data and studies conducted for residential/noise sensitive uses;and proposed projects;and d. specifically addresses construction operational c. the recordation of changes which occur in the techniques and practices. community's noise environment. The existing local noise map shall be updated as new information about the community's noise environment changes or becomes available,to ensure accuracy in land use compatibility planning and the mitigation of noise impacts. THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-12 4.1-13 HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISE ELEMENT I-N 4 1-N 5 Development Review Process Development Standards Revisions Through the proposed project development (i.e., site Modify the City's industrial and commercial zoning plan) review and through the environmental review development standards to require that the developments process: be designed in a sensitive manner to minimize potential noise impacts on abutting residential and noise sensitive a. address and sufficiently mitigate noise uses,including: impacts; b. require a noise evaluation for all projects to a. locating vehicle access points away from determine if unacceptable noise levels will be residential and/or noise sensitive parcels; created or experienced and to define noise b_ locating loading and shipping facilities away abatement; from adjacent noise sensitive uses; c. consider altering surface street flow methods; c. incorporating fences, walls, landscaping and d. configure non-residential developments' street other noise buffers and barriers between — patterns and access points to minimize incompatible uses; impacts; d. incorporating structural building materials e. limit the commercial land uses located below which mitigate sound transmission;and residential mixed-use structures to those which e. configuring interior spaces to minimize sound are not overly noise-intensive, and require amplification and transmission. design and construction measures which minimize the transfer of noise and vibration 1-N 6 from the commercial uses to residential uses; City Purchased Equipment Conformance f. implement all applicable provisions of the Uniform Building Code and the Huntington a. Purchase vehicles and other noise generating mechanical equipment which comply with and Beach Municipal Code which prevent and conform the latest available noise standards mitigate the transmission of excessive noise levels between business tenants and between and requirree ments. individual dwelling units; b. Conduct a feasibility study to determine the g. require that entertainment and restaurant/bar costs and benefits of retrofitting current land uses limit the activities and noise of city-owned equipment and vehicle to comply patrons in and around their facilities to ensure with noise performance standards. that noise levels emanating from the I-Nestablishments do not impact surrounding Int 7 eragency Coordination uses; nt h. encourage the installation of buffering Meet with representatives of the Orange County Transit techniques at major stationary ' noise District, Caltrans, and other local and regional public generators. Installation of such measures shall transit providers, on an annual basis, to discuss and be required prior to the renewal or issuance of suggest the impacts of the generation of their vehicles a business license or a Conditional Use Permit. on local noise conditions; feasible mitigation measures shall be suggested, requested, and implemented, as necessary to reduce such impacts. _ THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-13 4.1-14 HAZARDS CHAPTER NOISE ELEMENT I-N 8 I-N 12 Circulation and Air Quality Elements Residential Retrofit Funding Implementation Seek funding sources and create new programs which All feasible policies and programs of the General Plan's meet the funding criteria for the noise attenuation of Circulation and Air Quality Elements relating to the existing homes located on high noise level areas. further development and use of alternate modes of transportation and to the use of TDMs shall be fully implemented. I-N 9 Coordination with Rail Operators a. City of Huntington Beach representatives shall meet on a project by project basis to pro-actively work with light or fixed rail planners, engineers, and architects to ensure route and station locations and designs minimize impacts. b. Review local rail procedures and operations to monitor their potential noise-related impacts on the community. As necessary, staff shall meet with rail operating officials to discuss and/or suggest noise mitigation measures which reduce rail noise-related impacts on the community. I-N 10 FAA Funding Seek Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) funds to develop plans, and retrofit residential and sensitive land uses located within CNEL 65 contours to meet federal aircraft noise standards. I-N 11 Stationary Noise Generators New and expanded projects which are determined to be a potential major stationary noise source (based on the results of the local initial study and environmental checklist)shall fund and complete a specific acoustical analysis to identify, determine, and analyze potential impacts and propose appropriate mitigation measures. Said mitigation measures must be installed and tested - prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the structure. THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN V-N-14 4.1-15 ADM TF?ATKN d o d d o T 15 •E o i d s d 1 W d _ o aci E I v r3 E i3 ¢ LL U W lei a U CJ O U' 6 O K U' N ii No. Name anoFwwro�craeewi I anaFxuxmwraiec PROGRAM RESPONSREAGENCY FUNDMGSOURCE SCHEDULE N1 Noise Envinmment Data I Studies • I • i j t Year Plan N2 Noise Ordinance Enforcement • • j • • ongoing' N3 Noise Ordinance Revisions • i • • • r r�pv�n Plan N4 I Review Process • • I Ongoing' N5 Development Standards Revisions • • • • I I r YA.doph n plan N6 City Purchased Equipment Conformance • ® I • I I I 1 ye°popmm N7 Interagency Coordination • • ongoing' NS Circulation and Air Wy Dement Implemenm6on • I• i I To Ongoing ---- r N9 Coordination with Rail Operators • i FI• t • • • i ongoing' N10 FAA Fmmding • i I I ® I® Ong°Ns' I N11 Stationary Norse Generators • I ' • ongoing' N 12 Residential Retrofit Funding ®I • I 101, I•I 0.01 • Ongoing' As funding perils NOISE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM MATRIXI V CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH GENERAL PLAN 41'r3-6t s This Page Intentionally Left Blank APPENDIX 4.2 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis LO MRIBAN City of Huntington Beach,CA(JN:07984-03 Report.doc) CRoss RC>AX)S Huntington Beach Municipal Code 8.40.010--8.40.020(d) Chapter 8.40 NOISE CONTROL (1006-10/63, 1072-11/64, 1354-11/67, 1935-11/74,2364-5/79,2379-7/79, Urg.2434-5/80,2533-2/82,2788-9/85,3131-4/92, 3216-12/93,3514-12/01) Sections' 8.40.010 Declaration of policy 8.40.020 Definitions 8.40.030 Noise level measurement criteria 8.40.040 Designated noise zones 8.40.050 Exterior noise standards 8.40.060 Exterior noise levels prohibited 8.40.070 Interior noise standards 8.40.080 Interior levels of noise prohibited 8.40.090 Special provisions 8.40.095 Leaf blowers 8.40.100 Schools, hospitals and churches--Special provisions 8.40.110 Air conditioning, refrigeration--Special provisions 8.40.111 Prohibited noises 8.40.112 Loud noises 8.40.120 Manner of enforcement 8.40.130 Variance procedure 8.40.140 Noise Variance Board 8.40.150 Appeals 8.40.160 Appeals--Notice of hearing 8.40.170 Action of council 8.40.180 Violations--Misdemeanor 8.40.010 Declaration of policy. In order to control unnecessary, excessive and annoying sounds emanating from incorporated areas of the City, it is hereby declared to be the policy of the City to prohibit such sounds generated from all sources as specified in this chapter. It is determined that certain noise levels are detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety and contrary to public interest; therefore, the City Council does ordain and declare that creating, maintaining, causing or allowing to create, maintain or cause any noise in a manner prohibited by, or not in conformity with the provisions of this chapter, is a public nuisance and shall be punishable as such. (2379-7/79) 8.40.020 Definitions. The following words, phrases and terms as used in this chapter shall have the meaning as indicated below: (a) "Ambient noise level" shall mean the all-encompassing noise level associated with a given environment, being a composite of sounds from all sources, excluding the alleged offensive noise, at the location and approximate time at which a comparison with the alleged offensive noise is to be made. (b) "Commercial property" shall mean a parcel of real property which is developed and used either in part or in whole for commercial purposes including, but not limited to, retail and wholesale businesses and professional offices. (c) "Cumulative period" shall mean an additive period or time composed of individual time segments which may be continuous or interrupted. (d) "Decibel" (db) shall mean a unit which denotes the ratio between two (2) quantities which are proportional to power; the number of decibels corresponding to the ratio of two (2) amounts of power is ten(10)times the logarithm to the base ten(10) of this ratio. 12/01 4.2-1 8.40.020(e)--8.40.040 Huntington Beach Municipal Code (e) "Emergency machinery, vehicle or work" shall mean any machinery, vehicle or work used, employed or performed in an effort to protect, provide or restore safe conditions in the community or for the citizenry, or work by private or public utilities when restoring utility service. (f) "Fixed noise source" shall mean a stationary device which creates sounds while fixed or motionless, including but not limited to, industrial and commercial machinery and equipment, pumps, fans, compressors, generators, air conditioners and refrigeration equipment. (g) "Grading" shall mean any excavating or filling of earth material, or any combination thereof, conducted to prepare said site for construction or the placement of the improvements thereon. (h) "Impact noise" shall mean the noise produced by the collision of one mass in motion with a second mass which may be either in motion or at rest. (i) "Industrial property" shall mean a parcel of real property which is developed and used in part or in whole for manufacturing purposes including research and development uses. (j) "Mobile noise source" shall mean any noise source other than a fixed noise source. (k) "Noise level" shall mean the "A" weighted sound pressure level in decibels obtained by using a sound level meter at slow response with a reference pressure of twenty (20) micropascals (micronewtons per square meter). The unit of measurement shall be designated as db(A). (1) "Person" shall mean a person, firm, association, co-partnership,joint venture, corporation or any entity, public or private in nature. (m)"Residential property" shall mean a parcel of real property which is developed and used either in part or in whole for residential purposes, other than transient uses such as hotels or motels. (n) "Predominant tone noise" shall mean a noise characterized by a predominant frequency or frequencies so that other frequencies cannot be readily distinguished. (o) "Sound pressure level" of a sound, in decibels, shall mean twenty(20) times the logarithm to the base of ten (10) of the ratio of the pressure of the sound to a reference pressure, which reference pressure shall be explicitly stated. (2379-7/79) 8.40.030 Noise level measurement criteria. Any noise level measurements made pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be performed using a sound level meter as defined in this chapter. The focation selected for measuring exterior noise levels shall be at any point on the property line of the offender or anywhere on the affected property. Interior noise measurements shall be made within the affected unit. The measurement shall be made at a point in the affected unit at least four (4) feet from the wall, ceiling or floor nearest the noise source. All noise level measurements shall be performed in accordance with procedural rules and regulations of the Orange County Health Department. (2379-7/79) 8.40.040 Designated noise zones. The properties hereinafter described, whether within or without the City, are hereby assigned to the following noise zones: Noise Zone 1: All residential properties; Noise Zone 2: All professional office and public institutional properties; Noise Zone 3: All commercial properties with the exception of professional office properties;and Noise Zone 4: All industrial properties. (2379-7/79) 12/01 4.2-2 Huntington Beach Municipal Code 8.40.050--8.40.070(a) 8.40.050 Exterior noise standards. (a) The following noise standards, unless otherwise specifically indicated, shall apply to all residential property within a designated noise zone: Exterior Noise Standards Noise Zone Noise Level Time Period 1 55 db(A) 7 a.m. - 10 p.m. 50 db(A) 10 p.m. - 7 a.m. 2 55 db(A) Anytime 3 60 db(A) Anytime 4 70 db(A) Anytime (b) In the event the alleged offensive noise consists entirely of impact noise, simple tone noise, speech, music, or any combination thereof, each of the above noise levels shall be reduced by five (5) db(A). (2379-8/79, 2788-9/85) 8.40.060 Exterior noise levels prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the City to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the noise level when measured on any residential, public institutional, professional, commercial or industrial property, either within or without the City, to exceed the applicable noise standards: (a) For a cumulative period of more than thirty(30) minutes in any hour; (b) Plus 5 db(A) for a cumulative period of more than fifteen (15) minutes in any hour; (c) Plus 10 db(A) for a cumulative period of more than five (5)minutes in any hour; (d) Plus 15 db(A) for a cumulative period of more than one (1) minute in any hour; or (e) Plus 20 db(A) for any period of time. In the event the ambient noise level exceeds any of the first four noise limit categories above, the cumulative period applicable to said category shall be increased to reflect said ambient noise level. In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the fifth noise limit category, the maximum allowable noise level under said category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level. (2379-7/79) 8.40.070 Interior noise standards. (a) The following noise standards, unless otherwise specifically indicated, shall apply to all real property within a designated noise zone: Interior Noise Standards Noise Zone Noise Level Time Period 17 1 55 db(A) 7 a.m. -10 p.m. 45 db(A) 10 p.m. - 7 a.m. 2, 3, 4 55 db(A) Anytime 12/01 4.2-3 8.40.070(b)--8.40.090(g) Huntington Beach Municipal Code (b) In the event the alleged offensive noise consists entirely of impact noise, simple tone noise, speech, music, or any combination thereof, each of the above noise levels shall be reduced by five (5) db(A). (2379-7/79, 2788-9/85) 8.40.080 Interior levels of noise prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the City to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the noise level when measured within any other structure on any residential, public institutional, commercial, or industrial property to exceed: (a) The noise standard for a cumulative period of more than five minutes in any hour; (b) The noise standards plus 5 db(A) for a cumulative period of more than one (1) minute in any hour; or (c) The noise standard plus 10 db(a) for any period of time. In the event the ambient noise level exceeds either of the first two noise limit categories above, the cumulative period applicable to said category shall be increased to reflect said ambient noise level. In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the third noise level, the maximum allowable noise level under said category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level. Each of the noise limits specified above shall be reduced by 5 db(A) for impact or predominant tone noises, or for noises consisting of speech or music. In the event that the noise source and the affected property are within different noise zones, the noise standards of the affected property shall apply. (2379-7/79) 8.40.090 Special provisions. The following activities shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter: (a) School bands, school athletics and school entertainment events, provided such events are conducted on school property or authorized by special permit from the City; (b) Activities otherwise lawfully conducted in public parks, public playgrounds and public or private school grounds; (c) Any mechanical device, apparatus or equipment used, related to or connected with emergency machinery, vehicle or work; (d) Noise sources associated with construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property; provided a permit has been obtained from the City; and provided said activities do not take place between the hours of 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. (e) All mechanical devices, apparatus or equipment which are utilized for the protection or harvest of agricultural crops during periods of potential or actual frost damage or other adverse weather conditions; (f) Mobile noise sources associated with agricultural operations provided such operations do not take place between the hours of 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a federal holiday. (g) Mobile noise sources associated with agricultural pest control through pesticide application, provided that the application is made in accordance with restricted material permits issued by or regulations enforced by the Agricultural Commissioner; 12/01 4.2-4 Huntington Beach Municipal Code 8.40.090(h)--8.40.095(c)(5) (h) Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property provided said activities take place between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. on any day except Sunday or between the hours of 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Sunday or a federal holiday; (i) Leaf blower shall be governed by section 8.40.095. (3131-4/92) 0) Any activity or equipment to the extent that design regulation thereof has been pre-empted by state or federal laws. (2379-7/79) 8.40.095 Leaf blowers. (3131-4/92) (a) Definitions. As used in this section, the following terms shall have meanings as set forth below: (3131-4/92) (1) "Leaf blower" means any machine, however powered, used to blow leaves, dirt and other debris off sidewalks, driveways, lawns and other surfaces. (3131-4/92) (2) "Parcel" means an area of real property with a separate or distinct number or other designation shown on a plat recorded in the office of the County Recorder. Contiguous parcels owned by the same individual or entity shall be considered one parcel for purposes of this section. (3131-4/92) (b) Unlawful to propel debris beyondparcel boundary. It shall be unlawful for any person to use or operate any leaf blower in such a manner as to blow, dispel or make airborne, dust, leaves, grass cuttings, paper, trash or any other type of unattached debris or material, beyond the parcel boundaries of the parcel being cleaned, unless the consent of the adjoining owner or person in possession is obtained. It shall be unlawful for any person to use or operate any leaf blower within the City in such a way as to blow leaves, dirt and other debris onto the public rights-of-way or private property and to allow such debris to remain there in excess of thirty (30) minutes. (3131-4/92) (c) Special prohibitions. It shall be unlawful for any person to operate a leaf blower within a residential zone or within one hundred feet of a residential zone of the City of Huntington Beach, except under the following conditions: (3131-4/92) (1) Time restriction. Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property provided said activities take place between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M. on any day except Sunday or between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. on Sunday or a federal holiday. (3131-4/92) (2) Distance restriction. Leaf blowers shall not be operated within a horizontal distance of ten (10) feet of any operable window, door, or mechanical air intake opening or duct; (3131-4/92) (3) Duration of use restriction. Leaf blowers shall not be operated for more than fifteen (15) minutes per hour, per day, on parcels less than one-half acre and no more than thirty (30) minutes per hour on parcels greater than one-half acre up to one acre. Leaf blowers shall not be operated for more than two (2)hours on parcels of one acre or more. (3131-4/92) (4) Number restriction. No person shall operate more than one (1) leaf blower per parcel on one-half acre, no more than two (2) leaf blowers on parcels greater than one-half acre and no more than three (3) leaf blowers on parcels greater than one acre or more. (3131-4/92) (5) The maximum decibel level of 70 dba as measured ten (10) feet from the leaf blower shall not be exceeded. (3131-4/92) 12/01 4.2-5 8.40.100--8.40.112(c) Huntington Beach Municipal Code 8.40.100 Schools, hospitals and churches--Special provisions. It shall be unlawful for any person to create any noise which causes the noise level at any school, hospital or church while same is in use,to exceed the noise limits specified for exterior noise standards in this chapter, or which noise level unreasonably interferes with the use of such institutions or which unreasonably disturbs or annoys patients in the hospital, provided conspicuous signs are displayed in three (3) separate locations within one-tenth (1/10) of a mile of the institution indicating the presence of a school, hospital or church. (2379-7/79) 8.40.110 Air conditioning, refrigeration--Special provisions. During a one (1)year period following the effective date of this chapter, the noise level standards specified in this chapter shall be increased by 5 db(A) where the alleged noise source is an air-conditioning apparatus or refrigeration system, which was installed prior to the effective date of this chapter. (2379-7/79) 8.40.111 Prohibited noises. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter and in addition thereto, it shall be unlawful for any person to willfully make or continue, or cause to be made or continued, any loud, unnecessary or unusual noise which disturbs the peace or quiet of any neighborhood or which causes discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitiveness residing in the area. (3216-12/93) The standard which may be considered in determining whether a violation of the provisions of this section exists may include, but not be limited to, the following: (3216-12/93) (a) The level of the noise; (3216-12/93) (b) Whether the nature of the noise is usual or unusual; (3216-12/93) (c) Whether the origin of the noise is natural or unnatural; (3216-12/93) (d) The level and intensity of the background noise, if any; (3216-12/93) (e) The proximity of the noise to residential sleeping facilities; (3216-12/93) (f) The nature and zoning of the area within which the noise emanates; (3216-12/93) (g) The density of the inhabitation of the area within which the noise emanates; (3216-12/93) (h) The time of the day and night the noise occurs; (3216-12/93) (i) The duration of the noise; (3216-12/93) 0) Whether the noise is recurrent, intermittent or constant; and (3216-12/93) (k) Whether the noise is produced by a commercial or noncommercial activity. (3216-12/93) 8.40.112 Loud noises. It shall be unlawful for any person to: (3514-12/01) (a) Use, operate, or permit to be operated any radio,receiving set or device,television set, musical instrument, phonograph, CD, DVD, tape player,juke box, or other machine or device for producing or reproducing sound in such a manner as to disturb the peace, quiet, and comfort of other persons. (3514-12/01) (b) Make or allow to be made any noise which continues for more than a five minute period between the hours of 1 OPM and 7AM if such noise is audible for fifty feet or more from the source of the noise. (3514-12/01) (c) Maintain, manage, or control any business or residential property in violation of sections (a) or(b). (3514-12/01) 12101 4.2-6 Huntington Beach Municipal Code 8.40.112(d)--8.40.140 (d) Own, maintain, control, operate, take care or custody of, or otherwise provide any premises, and allow noise to continue after being informed, anytime within the preceding thirty days by the Police Department, that a violation of this chapter has been committed on said premises. (3514-12/01) (e) Violations of this section are hereby declared a nuisance. (3514-12/01) 8.40.120 Manner of enforcement. Except for Sections 8.40.111 and 8.40.112, the Orange County Health Officer and his duly authorized representatives are directed to enforce the provisions of this chapter. The Orange County Health Officer and his duly authorized representatives are authorized pursuant to Penal Code section 836.5 to arrest any person without a warrant when they have reasonable cause to believe that such person has committed a misdemeanor in their presence. (3216-12/93) If the Orange County Health Officer or his duly authorized representatives conduct db(A)tests or readings for purposes of enforcement, and the noise level is found to exceed those levels stipulated as permissible in this chapter, the owner or operator of the noise source shall be required to pay the cost of the db(A) tests or readings. No person shall interfere with, oppose or resist any authorized person charged with the enforcement of this chapter while such person is engaged in the performance of his duty. (2379-7/79, 2533-2/82) 8.40.130 Variance procedure. The owner or operator of a noise source which violates any of the provisions of this chapter may file an application with the Health Officer for a variance from the provisions thereof wherein said owner or operator shall set forth all actions taken to comply with said provisions, the reasons why immediate compliance cannot be achieved, a proposed method of achieving compliance, and a proposed time schedule for its accomplishment. Said application shall be accompanied by a fee in the amount of seventy-five dollars ($75). A separate application shall be filed for each noise source; provided, however,that several mobile sources under common ownership, or several fixed sources on a single property may be combined into one application. Upon receipt of said application and fee, the Health Officer shall refer it with his recommendation thereon in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. An applicant for a variance shall remain subject to prosecution under the terms of this chapter until a variance is granted. (2379-7/79) 8.40.140 Noise variance board. The noise Variance Board shall evaluate all applications for variance from the requirements of this chapter and may grant said variances with respect to time for compliance, subject to such terms, conditions and requirements as it may deem reasonable to achieve maximum compliance with the provisions of this chapter. Said terms, conditions and requirements may include, but shall not be limited to, limitations on noise levels and operating hours. Each such variance shall set forth in detail the approved method of achieving maximum compliance and a time schedule for its accomplishment. In its determination said board shall consider the magnitude of nuisance caused by the offensive noise; the uses of property within the area of impingement by the noise; the time factors related to study, design, financing and construction of remedial work; the economic factors related to age and useful life of equipment; and the general public interest and welfare. Any variance granted by said board shall be by resolution and shall be transmitted to the Health Officer for enforcement. Any violation of the terms of said variance shall be unlawful. 12/01 4.2-7 8.40.140--8.40.180 Huntington Beach Municipal Code Members of the Variance Board shall be appointed by, and shall serve at the pleasure of the Orange County board of supervisors. The Variance Board shall adopt reasonable rules and regulations for its own procedures in carrying out its functions under the provisions of this chapter. Three (3) members shall constitute a quorum and at least three (3) affirmative votes shall be required in support of any action. The Health Officer, or his appointed representative, shall be a nonvoting ex officio member of the Variance Board, and shall act as secretary of the board. Meetings of the noise Variance Board shall be held at the call of the secretary and at such times and locations as said board shall determine. All such meetings shall be open to the public. (2379-7/79) 8.40.150 Appeals. Within fifteen(15) days following notice to the City of the decision of the Variance Board on an application,the applicant, the Health Officer, or any member of the City Council, may appeal the decision to the City Council by filing a notice of appeal with the secretary of the Variance Board. In the case of an appeal by the applicant for a variance, the notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee to be computed by the secretary on the basis of the estimated cost of preparing the materials required to be forwarded to the City Council as discussed hereafter. If the actual cost of such preparation differs from the estimated cost,the applicant shall pay the difference to the secretary and the secretary shall pay the amount of any excess to the applicant. (2379-7179) 8.40.160 Appeals--Notice of hearing. Within fifteen(15) days following the receipt of a notice of appeal and the appeal fee, the secretary of the Variance Board shall forward to the City Council copies of the application for variance; the recommendation of the Health Officer; the notice of appeal; all evidence concerning said application received by the Variance Board and its decision thereon. In addition, any person may file with the City Council written arguments supporting or attacking said decision and the City Council may, in its discretion, hear oral arguments thereon. The City Clerk shall mail to the applicant a notice of the date set for hearing of the appeal. The notice shall be mailed at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing date. (2379-7/79) 8.40.170 Action of Council. Within sixty (60) days following its receipt of the notice of the appeal, the City Council shall either affirm, modify or reverse the decision of the Variance Board at a duly noticed public hearing. Such decision shall be based upon the City Council's evaluation of the matters submitted to it in light of the powers conferred on the Variance Board and the factors to be considered as set out in this chapter. As part of its decision, the council may direct the Variance Board to conduct further proceedings on said application. Failure of the City Council to affirm, modify or reverse the decision of the Variance Board within said sixty(60) day period shall constitute affirmation of the board's decision. (2379-7/79) 8.40.180 Violations--Misdemeanor. Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a MISDEMEANOR. Each day such violation is committed or permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. The provisions of this chapter shall not be construed as permitting conduct not proscribed herein and shall not affect the enforceability of any other applicable provisions of law. (2379-7179) 12/01 4.2-8 APPENDIX 4.3 Approved Specific Plan Significance Criteria Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ����� City of Huntington Beach,CA(JN:07984-03 Report doc) CROSSROADS 4 --Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures the equipment. Similarly, sound walls can be located around HVAC equipment that is located on the ground. Without mitigation, impacts could occur. Mitigation measures such as providing sound walls and requiring further studies for the commercial zone are presented in Section 4.8.4 below. Music and other noise from concert halls, theaters and similar establishments can also be a potential impact on adjacent land uses. A proposed CuIItural Arts Overlay area would allow a performing arts center within District of the DTSP. However; the performances would all be held in the interior of the performing arts building, which would be sound attenuated and likely would not create significant noise impacts. It should be noted that this overlay also allows library, museum, and art gallery uses. It is not known what uses may be proposed, if any, in the future..Noise from the concert hall/theater is not expected to be a significant impact. Amplified music and other noise at restaurants (dining) can have a potential impact on adjacent land uses. Eating and drinking uses are allowed inl Districts 1,2, 3, 6, and7, and amplified music from live entertainment and dancing uses would be permitted in Districts 1, 2 and 3 with a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) subject to Planning Commission (PC) approval. Findings for a CUP require that a project must demonstrate that it will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties and people in the vicinity. In addition,through conditions of approval (COAs) and provisions of the City's Noise Ordinance, potential noise impacts from these uses would be reduced to a less than significant level. 4.8.4 Mitigation Measures 1. Temporary Noise Impacts Project demolition and construction noise could result in significant impacts to nearby residences if uncontrolled. The most effective method of controlling construction noise is through limiting construction hours. The Noise Ordinance doe's have restrictions on construction hours. Therefore, the following mitigation measure and code requirement are proposed and consistent with the Noise Ordinance. MM 4.8-1 Noise attenuation devices shall be used on all construction equipment, and construction staging areas shall be located as far as possible from any residences or other noise sensitive receptors. CR 4.8-1 All construction activities shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 1 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Construction and demolition shall be prohibited on Sundays or federal holidays. 2. Long Term Off-Site Noise Impact's a. Traffic Noise Noise levels along the roadways impacted by the project would increase by less than 3 d13 due to the increase in traffic as a result of the project. Therefore, there would be no noise significant impacts to nearby residences due to the project.No mitigation is necessary. Draft Program Environmental Impact Report City of Huntington Beach page 4-150 Downtown Specific Plan Update 4.3-1 4.8 - Noise b. On-Site Activities Impacting Off-Site Areas Commercial establishments in Districts 1, 2 and 3 will be far enough from off-site sensitive locations to avoid a significant noise impact. Therefore, no mitigation is required. 3. Long Term On-Site Noise Impacts Lots containing newly constructed residential units facing Pacific Coast Highway, Goldenwest Street, Main Street, or Beach Boulevard may be subject to noise levels from roadway traffic in excess of 65 CNEL. Therefore, noise reduction measures may be required to achieve the noise standard along some of these roads. Since the plans for any potential new developments are not yet available,the exact noise reduction measures necessary to achieve mitigation cannot yet be determined. It is possible that measures to reduce noise levels could include (but not limited) for example, installation of sound attenuation such as quarter-inch plate glass, five-eighths-inch Plexiglas, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. Although noise attenuation measures (e.g., masonry material) might be warranted depending on the details of individual project locations,the areas identified that may be subject to noise levels from roadway traffic in excess of 65 CNEL are already developed with existing newer development (e.g., residences near Pacific Coast Highway and Goldenwest). Therefore,these areas with newer development would most likely remain unchanged. Mitigation Measure MM 4.8-2 will ensure that these uses meet the City's noise standards and mitigate the potential significant impact. MM 4.8-2 Prior to issuance of building permits for residences located within the 65 CNEL noise contour, a detailed noise assessment with noise reduction measures specified shall be prepared to show that noise levels in those areas will not exceed the 65 CNEL outdoor noise criteria. Prior to issuance of permits, a detailed noise assessment with noise reduction measures specified shall be prepared to show that noise levels in the residences will not exceed the 45 CNEL indoor noise standard. The assessment will be based on the architectural plans for each specific project. The reports by a qualified acoustical consultant and shall document the sources of noise impacting the areas and describe any measures required to meet the standard. These measures will be incorporated into the project plans. The report shall be completed and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits. Loading docks, parking lots, and mechanical equipment in Districts 1, 2 and 3 have the potential to generate excessive noise levels at adjacent residential areas.At this time, it is unknown if specific development projects will result in significant impacts. To ensure that potentially significant impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level,the following mitigation measure shall be required for future development projects as a result of the proposed project. MM 4.8-3 Prior to issuance of building permits, a detailed noise assessment shall be prepared for mixed-use and commercial projects within 50 feet of any residence to ensure that these sources do not exceed the City's Noise Ordinance limits. The assessment City of Huntington Beach Draft Program Environmental Impact Report Downtown Specific Plan Update page 4-151 4.3-2 4 - Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical engineer and shall document the noise generation characteristics of the proposed equipment and the projected noise levels at the nearest residential use. Compliance with the City's Noise Ordinance shall be demonstrated and any measures required to comply with the Noise Ordinance and reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels shall be included in the project plans. The report shall be completed and approved by the City prior to issuance of project approval. 4.8.5 Level of Significance after Mitigation With implementation of the recommended mitigation measures,the project will not result in unavoidable noise impacts associated with the project,with the exception of projects that include pile driving. Even with implementation of noise mitigation measures,these short-term construction- related impacts (pile driving)would be considered significant and unavoidable. 4.8.6 Significant and Unavoidable Impacts If any projects plan to include pile driving (e.g., for construction of subterranean parking), further analysis would be needed to determine any impacts from this activity. The use of pile drivers presents the greatest intensity potential for construction noise impacts. This temporary increase in ambient noise levels would be noticeable and would likely be cause for human annoyance. Therefore, construction activities associated with pile driving would be considered significant and unavoidable. All impacts relating to noise associated with the proposed project would be less than significant or mitigated to less than significant levels. Therefore, no significant and unavoidable impacts related to land use and planning would occur. 4.8.7 Cumulative Impacts Related development projects in the vicinity of the proposed project include projects that are already approved as identified in Table 4.12.3, Summary of Cumulative Projects (page 4-196) and that have been anticipated by the existing DTSP and the Huntington Beach General Plan. In one area (along the east side of ls` Street), cumulative traffic noise impacts will be significant, but the project will not contribute significantly to this increase,therefore, no mitigation is required. Cumulative noise impacts associated with the proposed project would be less than significant. Draft Program Environmental Impact Report City of Huntington Beach page 4-152 Downtown Specific Plan Update 4.3-3 This Page Intentionally Left Blank APPENDIX 5.1 Study Area Photos Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OUItBAMCity of Huntington Beach,CA(JN.•07984-03 Report.doc) a Y( N KOM _ ��r a � �• � w�J,CS`�,�t11.�E � � f, 9 a x� f nd 1♦7 AA�Cf � � - a y it I< at rTVIItJ 4)... K. sdc('AV141� E )N r is wo Mot, , � 1 r rA i a'�..uaztis1�~ ..1 `••�' I t Y IhA, i •x, ,Al This Page Intentionally Left Blank APPENDIX 5.2 Noise Monitoring Data Printouts Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis u���N City of Huntington Beach,CA(JN:07984-03 Report.doc) CROSSROADS 24-r_H Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number. 07984 Location#: Ll Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: Ll Start Date: Friday, October 28, 2011 Hourly Leq dB(A) Readings (unadjusted) 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 E7-- 9 771 10 _4 i, 11 Y 12 0 13 14 15 17 ZA 18 19 ---77J 20 21 22 23 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour., 12 Measured Peak Hour dBA Leq: 61.9 Monday,November 07,2011 5.2-1 24-HourNdio Level Measurement Summary Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number.- 07984 Location#: L1 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L1 Start Date: Friday, October 28, 2011 Leq To CNEL Noise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 58.1 10 68.1 1 58.7 10 68.7 2 56.6 10 66.6 3 53.5 10 63.5 4 53.7 10 63.7 5 54.5 10 64.5 6 55.5 10 65.5 7 57.8 0 57.8 8 56.7 0 56.7 9 59.7 0 59.7 10 56.6 0 56.6 11 58.1 0 58.1 12 61.9 0 61.9 13 57.1 0 57.1 14 58.3 0 58.3 15 57.8 0 57.8 16 58.7 0 58.7 17 57.7 0 57.7 18 58.6 0 58.6 19 57.1 5 62.1 20 57.2 5 62.2 21 58.6 5 63.6 22 59.1 10 69.1 23 %0 10 69.0 Calculated CNEL: 63.9 Monday,November 07,2011 5.2-2 Mea mentSuffithdry- 24-HOu r'N ip�q,Level' sure Project Name.- Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number 07984 Location 9: L2 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L2 Start Date.- Friday, October 28, 2011 Hourly Leq dB(A) Readings (unadjusted) 0 3 4 1 N3I 17 i�TF� 71 6 7 8 ,- 7777777� 91, CD 10 4 -20� 12 L, X, 0 13 -.-77 I 14 :7 15 16 1 41 Z' 20 21 22' -4 :23 ----- 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour. 14 Measured Peak Hour dBA Leq: 68.0 Monday,November 07,2011 5.2-3 214-Hour Noise Level MpasuremetitSummary, Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number." 07984 Location#: L2 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L2 Start Date: Friday, October 28, 2011 Leq To CNEL Noise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 57.5 10 67.5 1 56.9 10 66.9 2 56.6 10 66.6 3 53.3 10 63.3 4 53.5 10 63.5 5 54.1 10 64.1 6 54.7 10 64.7 7 56.3 0 56.3 8 60.6 0 60.6 9 62.7 0 62.7 10 61.0 0 61.0 11 61.4 0 61.4 12 63.3 0 63.3 13 67.3 0 67.3 14 68.0 0 68.0 15 64.5 0 64.5 16 66.4 0 66.4 17 65.2 0 65.2 18 62.4 0 62.4 19 60.0 5 65.0 20 60.6 5 65.6 21 60.1 5 65.1 22 59.8 10 69.8 23 60.5 10 70.5 Calculated CNEL: 65.6 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-4 0 0 Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number- 07984 Location #: U Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: U Start Date: Friday, October 28, 2011 Hourly Leq dB(A) Readings (unadjusted) p 2 3 4 fi J. 5 6 8 9 10 . c 11Ca e m Z 12 , 0 x 13 .P9 14 A 15 x` 17w 18 19 20 s 21 22 M 23 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour: 18 Measured Peak Hour dBA Leq: 60.1 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-5 0 diis&L&61 Measurement Summary? Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number. 07984 Location#: L1 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L1 Start Date. Saturday, October 29, 2011 Hourly Lech dB(A) Readings (unadjusted) 0 2 , 3 +` 4 t 6 W 7 : . 9 of 10 c_ m m 12 0 = 13 k h• 14 16 17 „ +m 18 19 . 20 - 22 fi 23 ; 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour: 12 Measured Peak Hour dBA Leq: 61.9 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-6 Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number. 07984 Location#: L1 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L1 Start Date: Saturday, October 29, 2011 Leq To CNEL Noise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 58.1 10 68.1 1 58.7 10 68.7 2 56.6 10 66.6 3 53.5 10 63.5 4 53.7 10 63.7 5 54.5 10 64.5 6 55.5 10 65.5 7 57.8 0 57.8 8 56.7 0 56.7 9 59.7 0 59.7 10 61.1 0 61.1 11 58.1 0 58.1 12 61.9 0 61.9 13 57.1 0 57.1 14 58.3 0 58.3 15 57.8 0 57.8 16 59.3 0 59.3 17 60.0 0 60.0 18 57.6 0 57.6 19 57.6 5 62.6 20 56.6 5 61.6 21 57.2 5 62.2 22 58.0 10 68.0 23 58.8 10 68.8 Calculated CNEL: 63.8 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-7 -Hour�24o Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number: 07984 Location #: L2 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L2 Start Date: Saturday, October 29, 2011 Hourly Leq dB(A) headings (unadjusted) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 c 11 m 12 0 = 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour: 9 Measured Peak Hour d8A Leq: 63.1 Monday,November 07,2011 5.2-8 0 0 Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number: 07984 Location#: L2 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L2 Start Date: Saturday, October 29, 2011 Leq To CNEL Noise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 59.6 10 69.6 1 59.9 10 69.9 2 59.6 10 69.6 3 56.3 10 66.3 4 56.5 10 66.5 5 57.1 10 67.1 6 57.8 10 67.8 7 59.3 0 59.3 8 59.7 0 59.7 9 63.1 0 63.1 10 61.8 0 61.8 11 61.4 0 61.4 12 62.6 0 62.6 13 61.2 0 61.2 14 62.7 0 62.7 15 61.5 0 61.5 16 59.5 0 59.5 17 58.4 0 58.4 18 57.3 0 57.3 19 56.9 5 61.9 20 57.1 5 62.1 21 57.3 5 62.3 22 57.6 10 67.6 23 58.3 10 68.3 Calculated CNEL: 65.3 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-9 '24-Hour Noise Level Measurement S.Ummary Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number.' 07984 Location#: L3 Analyst., J.T. Stephens Description: L3 Start Date: Saturday, October 29, 2011 Hourly Leq dB(A) Readings (unadjusted) 0 1 2 . 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 c m m 12 0 = 13 14 15 .. 16 17 ' 18 19 20 21 22 23 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour., 16 Measured Peak Hour dBA Leq: 59.8 Monday,November 07,2011 5.2-10 24-Ho Wise Lev6l'Meas�ijreniLt�,ni8-Umhiafry Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number.' 07984 Location#: L3 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L3 Start Date: Saturday, October 29, 2011 Leq To CNEL Boise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 58.4 10 68.4 1 57.8 10 67.8 2 57.7 10 67.7 3 56.9 10 66.9 4 57.2 10 67.2 5 57.5 10 67.5 6 57.8 10 67.8 7 58.5 0 58.5 8 57.9 0 57.9 9 59.0 0 59.0 10 59.0 0 59.0 11 59.0 0 59.0 12 59.1 0 59.1 13 58.8 0 58.8 14 59.0 0 59.0 15 59.2 0 59.2 16 59.8 0 59.8 17 59.5 0 59.5 18 59.3 0 59.3 19 58.7 5 63.7 20 58.6 5 63.6 21 58.7 5 63.7 22 58.7 10 68.7 23 58.3 10 68.3 Calculated CNEL: 64.7 Monday,November 07,2011 5.2-11 0 0 Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number.- 07984 Location#: L1 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L1 Start Date: Sunday, October 30, 2011 Hourly Leq dB(A) Readings (unadjusted) 2 3 4 �. 5 k,, ;V 6 AL 7 ' 8 , 9 - a� 10 ., c •E- m °n 12 _ 0 x 13 14 15 ¢. 16 a - 17 18 k h.. 19 . 20 22 :: 23 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour: 13 Measured Peak Hour dBA Leq: 60.3 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-12 0 0 Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number.' 07984 Location#: L1 Analyst. J.T. Stephens Description: L1 Start Date: Sunday, October 30, 2011 Leq To CNEL Noise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 59.2 10 69.2 1 59.4 10 69.4 2 57.9 10 67.9 3 54.2 10 64.2 4 52.6 10 62.6 5 53.0 10 63.0 6 54.1 10 64.1 7 56.0 0 56.0 8 58.0 0 58.0 9 58.4 0 58.4 10 56.6 0 56.6 11 57.8 0 57.8 12 59.1 0 59.1 13 60.3 0 60.3 14 60.0 0 60.0 15 60.0 0 60.0 16 60.0 0 60.0 17 58.2 0 58.2 18 59.1 0 59.1 19 57.1 5 62.1 20 57.6 5 62.6 21 56.2 5 61.2 22 55.0 10 65.0 23 54.8 10 64.8 Calculated CNEL: 63.4 Monday,November 07,2011 5.2-13 ® 0 Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number.- 07984 Location#: L2 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L2 Start Date: Sunday, October 30, 2011 Hourly Legg dB(A) Readings (unadjusted) p 2 �-7 3e' 4 6 , 7 s, . 7 8c` 9 r>.; 10 c - 11 d m 12 0 z 13 ' 14 , 15 N gip° 16 ,>� 17 ; 18 ,. 19 . 20 21 22 :. 23 x ._ 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour: 15 Measured Peak Hour dBA Leq: 63.6 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-14 24-HoU f Noise,Level:Measurement.Summary Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number. 07984 Location#: L2 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L2 Start Date: Sunday, October 30, 2011 Leq To CNEL (Noise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 60.3 10 70.3 1 60.1 10 70.1 2 59.7 10 69.7 3 56.7 10 66.7 4 56.1 10 66.1 5 56.5 10 66.5 6 57.3 10 67.3 7 58.8 0 58.8 8 59.5 0 59.5 9 62.1 0 62.1 10 60.9 0 60.9 11 61.7 0 61.7 12 63.1 0 63.1 13 63.3 0 63.3 14 63.5 0 63.5 15 63.6 0 63.6 16 60.0 0 60.0 17 59.0 0 59.0 18 58.9 0 58.9 19 56.9 5 61.9 20 57.3 5 62.3 21 56.0 5 61.0 22 55.5 10 65.5 23 55.4 10 65.4 Calculated CNEL: 65.1 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-15 24-Hour Noise Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number. 07984 Location#: L3 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L3 Start Date: Sunday, October 30, 2011 Hourly Leq dB(A) Readings (unadjusted) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 •� 11 m m 12 0 = 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour., 16 Measured Peak Hour dBA Leq: 60.2 Monday,November 07,2011 5.2-16 24-Hour Noise Level Me.asuremerit'suffirnafy Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number., 07984 Location#: L3 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description. L3 Start Date: Sunday, October 30, 2011 Leq To CNEL Noise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 58.4 10 68.4 1 58.3 10 68.3 2 58.3 10 68.3 3 57.3 10 67.3 4 56.9 10 66.9 5 56.9 10 66.9 6 57.1 10 67.1 7 57.7 0 57.7 8 57.6 0 57.6 9 58.6 0 58.6 10 58.3 0 58.3 11 58.8 0 58.8 12 59.2 0 59.2 13 60.0 0 60.0 14 59.7 0 59.7 15 60.2 0 60.2 16 60.2 0 60.2 17 59.8 0 59.8 18 59.8 0 59.8 19 59.1 5 64.1 20 58.8 5 63.8 21 58.2 5 63.2 22 57.9 10 67.9 23 57.7 10 67.7 Calculated CNEL: 64.6 Monday,November 07,2011 5.2-17 Project Name: me5ge Development Noise analysis Job Number- 079 8 Location * 11 Analyst., J.T. Stephens Description: L1 Start Date Monday, October af 2011 Hourly Leq dB(A) Readings (unadjust ed) 2 3 4 e < < ? < . : z . . 1 . ° x77"+ 7 , B @amp > ,v2?« o 10 3: a» . © 711, � � 12 �y «� . I g : « : ©»: 7 Szz2777'x » >37 # 9 » . . « ter « z> aw +y # # 2 xm ,»« : r > . y , .y. --------------- 2 2 45 a # 5 S 5 9 S e e « £ # Hourly LegdB(m Measured Peak Noise Hour. 9 Measured Peak Hour dBA Le= 6.7 Monday, November 07,2011 E»e ,24-HOUf Nbise,Levell Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number. 07984 Location#: L1 Analyst. J.T. Stephens Description: L1 Start Date. Monday, October 31, 2011 Leq To CNEL Noise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 53.1 10 63.1 1 53.5 10 63.5 2 52.2 10 62.2 3 52.3 10 62.3 4 52.0 10 62.0 5 52.8 10 62.8 6 54.4 10 64.4 7 57.2 0 57.2 8 56.9 0 56.9 9 62.7 0 62.7 10 56.1 0 56.1 11 56.6 0 56.6 12 57.2 0 57.2 13 59.3 0 59.3 14 57.3 0 57.3 15 60.0 0 60.0 16 60.0 0 60.0 17 58.2 0 58.2 18 59.1 0 59.1 19 57.1 5 62.1 20 57.6 5 62.6 21 56.2 5 61.2 22 55.0 10 65.0 23 54.8 10 64.8 Calculated CNEL: 61.5 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-19 0 0 Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number.` 07984 Location#, L2 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L2 Start Date: Monday, October 31, 2011 Hourly Omer) dB(A) Readings (unadjusted) o 1 a 3 C. 4 5 x 6 Y i j- . 7; 7 GF 8 9 10 C 11 m m 12 or a 0 0 z 13 14 15 16 iIEL . 17 �t;M 18 : , - . 19 20 z 22 23 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour: 15 Measured Peak Hour dBA Leq: 63.6 Monday,November 07,2011 5.2-20 e o Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number.' 07984 Location#. L2 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L2 Start Date: Monday, October 31, 2011 Leq To CNEL Boise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 57.6 10 67.6 1 58.4 10 68.4 2 58.0 10 68.0 3 55.8 10 65.8 4 55.9 10 65.9 5 56.4 10 66.4 6 57.6 10 67.6 7 59.3 0 59.3 8 60.0 0 60.0 9 63.2 0 63.2 10 60.5 0 60.5 11 60.6 0 60.6 12 61.6 0 61.6 13 61.8 0 61.8 14 62.0 0 62.0 15 63.6 0 63.6 16 60.0 0 60.0 17 59.0 0 59.0 18 58.9 0 58.9 19 56.9 5 61.9 20 57.3 5 62.3 21 56.0 5 61.0 22 55.5 10 65.5 23 55.4 10 65.4 Calculated CNEL: 64.2 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-21 '24-Hour, 0 Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number.' 07984 Location#: L3 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description: L3 Start Date: Monday, October 31, 2011 Hourly Leq dB(A) Readings (unadjusted) 0 - 2 3 4 5 6 . 7 t � 8 ;M. µ g 10 c m 0 = 13 14 15 16 18 < 19 t,, ; 20 21 22 23 -f. 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 Hourly Leq dB(A) Measured Peak Noise Hour: 96 Measured Peak Hour dBA Leq: 60.2 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-22 Project Name: Pierside Development Noise Analysis Job Number., 07984 Location#: L3 Analyst: J.T. Stephens Description. L3 Start Date: Monday, October 31, 2011 Leq To CNEL Noise Calculations Noise Hour Hourly Leq CNEL Penalty Adjusted Hourly Leq 0 56.4 10 66.4 1 56.1 10 66.1 2 56.1 10 66.1 3 56.0 10 66.0 4 56.0 10 66.0 5 56.3 10 66.3 6 57.0 10 67.0 7 57.8 0 57.8 8 58.5 0 58.5 9 58.8 0 58.8 10 58.0 0 58.0 11 57.5 0 57.5 12 57.9 0 57.9 13 58.9 0 58.9 14 58.3 0 58.3 15 60.2 0 60.2 16 60.2 0 60.2 17 59.8 0 59.8 18 59.8 0 59.8 19 59.1 5 64.1 20 58.8 5 63.8 21 58.2 5 63.2 22 57.9 10 67.9 23 57.7 10 67.7 Calculated CNEL: 63.9 Monday, November 07,2011 5.2-23 This Page Intentionally Left Blank APPENDIX 5.3 Short-Term Noise Measurement to Hourly Leq Printouts Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis OURBAM City of Huntington Beach,CA(JN.07984-03 Report.doc) B Leq Reference 24h Measurement Location: L1 Project.- Pierside Pavilion Noise Measurement location: S1 Job Number.' 7984 Measurement Time: 1500 Analyst: J. Stephens Measurement Level(dBA Leq): 65.6 Hour Adjusted Hourly CNEL Hourly Leq Beginning Leq Penalty With CNEL Penalty 0000 65.9 10.0 75.9 0100 66.5 10.0 76.5 0200 64.4 10.0 74.4 0300 61.3 10.0 71.3 0400 61.5 10.0 71.5 0500 62.3 10.0 72.3 0600 63.3 10.0 73.3 0700 65.6 0.0 65.6 0800 64.5 0.0 64.5 0900 67.5 0.0 67.5 1000 68.9 0.0 68.9 1100 65.9 0.0 65.9 1200 69.7 0.0 69.7 1300 64.9 0.0 64.9 1400 66.1 0.0 66.1 1500 65.6 0.0 65.6 1600 67.1 0.0 67.1 1700 67.8 0.0 67.8 1800 65.4 0.0 65.4 1900 65.4 5.0 70.4 2000 64.4 5.0 69.4 2100 65.0 5.0 70.0 2200 65.8 10.0 75.8 2300 66.6 10.0 76.6 Resulting CNEL(dBA) : 71.6 U:\UcJobs\_07600-08000\07900\07984\Fieldwork\Short Term Measurements\[LegCNEL-24hmeasurement_based.xls]S1 5.3-1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank APPEN®Ix 6.1 Off-Site Traffic Noise Impact Calculation Printouts Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise ImpactAnalysis City of Huntington Beach,CA(JN:07984-03 Report.doc) OURBAN - r o ® os Scenario: Existing Conditions Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Pacific Coast Highway Job Number. 7984 Road Segment: w/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 26,000 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles). 15 Peak Hour Volume: 2,600 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles). 15 Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 69 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer.- 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.' 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 104.569 Left View. -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 104.485 Right View. 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 104.493 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 2.20 -4.91 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -15.04 -4.90 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -19.00 -4.91 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 64.5 62.7 60.9 54.8 63.5 64.1 Medium Trucks: 58.3 56.8 50.4 48.9 57.4 57.6 Heavy Trucks: 59.2 57.7 48.7 49.9 58.3 58.4 Vehicle Noise: 66.4 64.6 61.5 56.8 65.4 65.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) _ 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 54 116 250 539 CNEL: 58 125 269 579 Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-1 FHWArREi-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing Conditions Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Pacific Coast Highway Job Number. 7984 Road Segment: e/o Main St. Analyst. J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA 7 NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 26,100 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 2,610 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 69 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height. 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer.- 110.0 feet Autos. 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.' 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 104.569 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks. 104.485 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 104.493 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL FTrafficFlow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 2.22 -4.91 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -15.02 -4.90 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -18.98 -4.91 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq bay=Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 64.6 62.7 60.9 54.8 63.5 64.1 Medium Trucks: 58.3 56.8 50.5 48.9 57.4 57.6 Heavy Trucks: 59.2 57.7 48.7 50.0 58.3 58.4 Vehicle Noise: 66.4 64.7 61.5 56.8 65.4 65.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn. 54 116 251 541 CNEL: 58 125 269' 580 ,Aonday,November 07,2011 6.1-2 -D-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREbICT71ONMODEL Scenario: Existing Conditions Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Main Street Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: P.C.H. to Walnut Ave. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 2,300 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles). 15 Peak Hour Volume: 230 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening I Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height. 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks. 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier., 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer: 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.- 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -7.82 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -25.06 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -29.02 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 52.3 50.4 48.6 42.5 51.2 51.8 Medium Trucks: 46.2 44.7 38.4 36.8 45.3 45.5 Heavy Trucks: 47.5 46.1 37.1 38.3 46.7 46.8 Vehicle Noise: 54.3 52.5 49.3 44.7 53.2 53.7 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 8 18 39 84 CNEL: 9 19 42 90 Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-3 R-I) 0:�11HIGIHWAY NOISE PREDICTIONMODEL, Scenario:. Existing Conditions Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Main Street Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: n/o Walnut Ave. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 1,200 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume. 120 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Autos. 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer: 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.' 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad). 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View. 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -10.65 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -27.89 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks. 82.99 -31.84 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos. 49.4 47.5 45.8 39.7 48.3 48.9 Medium Trucks: 43.4 41.9 35.5 34.0 42.4 42.7 Heavy Trucks: 44.7 43.3 34.3 35.5 43.9 44.0 Vehicle Noise: 51.4 49.7 46.4 41.9 50.4 50.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 5 12 25 54 CNEL: 6 13 27 58 Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-4 ® a ® ® - ® Scenario: Existing Conditions Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Walnut Avenue Job Number. 7984 Road Segment: w/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 2,600 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage. 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 260 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance. 12 feet Vehicle Type Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks. 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier., 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer. 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer. 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks. 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks. 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations Vehicle Type REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -7.29 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks. 77.72 -24.53 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks. 82.99 -28.48 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn_J CNEL Autos: 52.8 50.9 49.1 43.1 51.7 52.3 Medium Trucks: 46.8 45.2 38.9 37.3 45.8 46.0 Heavy Trucks: 48.1 46.7 37.6 38.9 47.2 47.4 Vehicle Noise: 54.8 53.1 49.8 45.2 53.8 54.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 9 20 42 91 CNEL: 10 21 45 98 Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-5 DEL Scenario: Existing Conditions Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Walnut Avenue Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: Main St. to Third St. Analyst. J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 2,200 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage. 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 220 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening I Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height. 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer.' 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.- 10.0 feet Medium.Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos. 66.51 -8.02 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -25.25 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks. 82.99 -29.21 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0,000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 52.1 50.2 48.4 42.3 51.0 51.6 Medium Trucks: 46.0 44.5 38.2 36.6 45.1 45.3 Heavy Trucks: 47.4 45.9 36.9 38.1 46.5 46.6 Vehicle Noise. 54.1 52.3 49.1 44.5 53.0 53.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) _ __ 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 8 18 38 81 CNEL: 9 19 41 87 Aonday, November 07,2011 6.1-6 FHWA-RD e • ® • • ® Scenario: Existing Conditions Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Walnut Avenue Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: e/o Third St. Analyst. J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 1,400 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles). 15 Peak Hour Volume: 140 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height. 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer.' 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer. 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation. 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos. 66.51 -9.98 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72, -27.22 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -31.17 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 50.1 48.2 46.4 40.4 49.0 49.6 Medium Trucks: 44.1 42.6 36.2 34.7 43.1 43.3 Heavy Trucks: 45.4 44.0 34.9 36.2 44.5 44.7 Vehicle Noise. 52.1 50.4 47.1 42.5 51.1 51.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn. 6 13 28 60 CNEL: 6 14 30 65 .Aonday,November 07,2011 6.1-7 e � ® s � �EL Scenario: Existing Conditions Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Third Street Job Number: 7984 Road Segment. n/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 900 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 90 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks. 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier., 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer. 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer. 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation. 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos. 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks. 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks. 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresne/ Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -11.90 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -29.14 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -33.09 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day �Leq Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 48.2 46.3 44.5 38.5 47.1 47.7 Medium Trucks: 42.1 40.6 34.3 32.7 41.2 41.4 Heavy Trucks: 43.5 42.0 33.0 34.3 42.6 42.7 Vehicle Noise. 50.2 48.5 45.2 40.6 49.2 49.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 4 10 21 45 CNEL: 5 10 22 48 Aonday, November 07,2011 6.1-8 e 68� ,H-Id�tWAYNO(SEPREDICTION�MODEL 92, Scenario: 2020 No Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Pacific Coast Highway Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: w/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions (Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 33,300 vehicles Autos. 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 3,330 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 69 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer.' 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 104.569 Left View. -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 104.485 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 104.493 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 3.27 -4.91 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -13.96 -4.90 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -17.92 -4.91 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 65.6 63.7 62.0 55.9 64.5 65.1 Medium Trucks: 59.4 57.9 51.5 50.0 58.4 58.7 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 58.8 49.8 51.0 59.4 59.5 Vehicle Noise: 67.5 65.7 62.6 57.9 66.4 66.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA= 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 64 137 295 636 CNEL: 68 147 317 682 Monday, November 07,2011 6.1-9 Scenario. 2020 No Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Pacific Coast Highway Job Number.' 7984 Road Segment: e/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 33,400 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 3,340 vehicles Heavy Trucks(3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed. 45 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 69 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer. 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer. 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Road Grade. 0.0% Autos: 104.569 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 104.485 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 104.493 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL TTrafticFlow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 3.29 -4.91 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -13.95 -4.90 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -17.91 -4.91 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 65.6 63.7 62.0 55.9 64.5 65.1 Medium Trucks: 59.4 57.9 51.5 50.0 58.4 58.7 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 58.8 49.8 51.0 59.4 59.5 Vehicle Noise: 67.5 65.7 62.6 57.9 66.4 66.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA I 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 64 137 296 637 CNEL: 68 147 317 684 Aonday,November 07,2011 6.1-10 FHWA-RD-77A.'08s r da Scenario: 2020 No Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Main Street Job Number.- 7984 Road Segment: P.C.H. to Walnut Ave. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 2,700 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks(2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 270 vehicles Heavy Trucks(3+Axles). 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet Vehicle Type Day I Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks. 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier.' 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer. 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer. 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad). 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View. 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations Vehicle Type r REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -7.13 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -24.36 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -28.32 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Vehicle Type Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 52.9 51.1 49.3 43.2 51.9 52.5 Medium Trucks: 46.9 45.4 39.0 37.5 46.0 46.2 Heavy Trucks: 48.2 46.8 37.8 39.0 47.4 47.5 Vehicle Noise: 55.0 53.2 49.9 45.4 53.9 54.4 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 9 20 43 93 CNEL: 10 22 46 100 ,Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-11 - ® e ® • ® e Scenario: 2020 No Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Main Street Job Number. 7984 Road Segment. n/o Walnut Ave. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 1,700 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 170 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed. 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening I Night Daily Site Data Autos. 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height. 0.0 feet Medium Trucks. 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer. 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.' 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -9.14 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -26.37 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -30.33 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 50.9 49.0 47.3 41.2 49.8 50.4 Medium Trucks: 44.9 43.4 37.0 35.5 44.0 44.2 Heavy Trucks: 46.2 44.8 35.8 37.0 45.4 45.5 Vehicle Noise: 52.9 51.2 47.9 43.4 51.9 52.4 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) _ 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 7 15 32 69 CNEL: 7 16 34 73 Jlonday, November 07,2011 6.1-12 FHWA-RD-�77,-l'ogHIGHWAYNOI$EPREi ® 9 Scenario: 2020 No Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Walnut Avenue Job Number.' 7984 Road Segment: w/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 4,100 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume. 410 vehicles Heavy Trucks(3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening I Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer: 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer. 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks. 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks. 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMELT Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -5.31 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -22.55 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -26.51 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 54.8 52.9 51.1 45.0 53.7 54.3 Medium Trucks: 48.7 47.2 40.9 39.3 47.8 48.0 Heavy Trucks: 50.1 48.6 39.6 40.8 49.2 49.3 Vehicle Noise: 56.8 55.0 51.8 47.2 55.7 56.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn. 12 27 57 123 CNEL: 13 28 61 132 Monday, November 07,2011 6.1-13 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISEoM,Obtl- A." Scenario: 2020 No Project Project Name. Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Walnut Avenue Job Number.- 7984 Road Segment: Main St. to Third St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 3,400 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage. 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 340 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles). 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/FarLane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height. 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier.- 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer., 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.- 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation. 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks. 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 7 REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -6.12 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -23.36 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -27.32 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 54.0 52.1 50.3 44.2 52.9 53.5 Medium Trucks: 47.9 46.4 40.1 38.5 47.0 47.2 Heavy Trucks: 49.2 47.8 38.8 40.0 48.4 48.5 Vehicle Noise: 56.0 54.2 51.0 46.4 54.9 55.4 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA T dBA Ldn: 11 23 51 109 CNEL: 12 25 54 117 Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-14 FHWA-RO-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE • •P Scenario: 2020 No Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Walnut Avenue Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: e/o Third St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 2,100 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 210 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed. 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer: 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.' 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View.' -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View. 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos. 66.51 -8.22 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -25.46 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -29.41 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 51.9 50.0 48.2 42.1 50.8 51.4 Medium Trucks: 45.8 44.3 38.0 36.4 44.9 45.1 Heavy Trucks: 47.2 45.7 36.7 37.9 46.3 46.4 Vehicle Noise: 53.9 52.1 48.9 44.3 52.8 53.3 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA E 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 8 17 37 79 CNEL: 8 18 39 85 ,Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-15 i 1 : • PREDICTION0 Scenario: 2020 No Project Project Name. Pierside Pavilion Road Name. Third Street Job Number.' 7984 Road Segment. n/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 1,500 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 150 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height. 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier., 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer: 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.' 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -9.68 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -26.92 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -30.87 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 50.4 48.5 46.7 40.7 49.3 49.9 Medium Trucks: 44.4 42.9 36.5 35.0 43.4 43.6 Heavy Trucks: 45.7 44.3 35.2 36.5 44.8 45.0 Vehicle Noise: 52.4 50.7 47.4 42.8 51.4 51.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA I 65 dBA I 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn. 6 14 29 63 CNEL: 7 15 31 68 ,Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-16 -D-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTIONor Scenario: 2020 With Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Pacific Coast Highway Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: w/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 33,600 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 3,360 vehicles Heavy Trucks(3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 69 feet Vehicle Type Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer: 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer. 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 104.569 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 104.485 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 104.493 FHWA Noise Model Calculations Vehicle Type REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 3.31 -4.91 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -13.93 -4.90 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -17.88 -4.91 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) Vehicle Type Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 65.7 63.8 62.0 55.9 64.6 65.2 Medium Trucks: 59.4 57.9 51.5 50.0 58.5 58.7 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 58.8 49.8 51.1 59.4 59.5 Vehicle Noise: 67.5 65.8 62.6 57.9 66.5 66.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 64 138 297 640 CNEL: 69 148 319 686 Monday, November 07,2011 6.1-17 -D-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTIONMODEL. Scenario: 2020 With Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Pacific Coast Highway Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: e/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 33,600 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 3,360 vehicles Heavy Trucks(3+Axles). 15 Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 69 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer: 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 104.569 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 104.485 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 104.493 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 3.31 -4.91 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -13.93 -4.90 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -17.88 -4.91 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 65.7 63.8 62.0 55.9 64.6 65.2 Medium Trucks: 59.4 57.9 51.5 50.0 58.5 58.7 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 58.8 49.8 51.1 59.4 59.5 Vehicle Noise: 67.5 65.8 62.6 57.9 66.5 66.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 64 138 297 640 CNEL. 69 148 319 686 Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-18 - r o ® r ® er Scenario: 2020 With Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Main Street Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: P.C.H. to Walnut Ave. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 3,200 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks(2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume. 320 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer. 110.0 feet Autos. 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.- 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -6.39 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -23.63 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -27.58 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 53.7 51.8 50.0 44.0 52.6 53.2 Medium Trucks: 47.7 46.1 39.8 38.2 46.7 46.9 Heavy Trucks: 49.0 47.6 38.5 39.8 48.1 48.3 Vehicle Noise: 55.7 54.0 50.7 46.1 54.7 55.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 10 23 49 105 CNEL: 11 24 52 112 Monday, November 07,2011 6.1-19 FHWA-RD-77-1,08 OISE PREDICTIONsoo Scenario: 2020 With Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Main Street Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: n/o Walnut Ave. Analyst. J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions (Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt). 1,800 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles). 15 Peak Hour Volume: 180 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed. 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks. 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks. 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer., 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer.- 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -8.89 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -26.13 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks. 82.99 -30.08 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 51.2 49.3 47.5 41.5 50.1 50.7 Medium Trucks: 45.2 43.7 37.3 35.7 44.2 44.4 Heavy Trucks: 46.5 45.1 36.0 37.3 45.6 45.8 Vehicle Noise: 53.2 51.5 48.2 43.6 52.2 52.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA I 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 7 15 33 71 CNEL: 8 16 35 76 Monday, November 07,2011 6.1-20 Scenario: 2020 With Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Walnut Avenue Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: w/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 4,100 vehicles Autos. 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 410 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed. 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet Vehicle Type Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height. 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer: 110.0 feet Autos. 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer., 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation. 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade. 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks. 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks. 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -5.31 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -22.55 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -26.51 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) Vehicle Type Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 54.8 52.9 51.1 45.0 53.7 54.3 Medium Trucks. 48.7 47.2 40.9 39.3 47.8 48.0 Heavy Trucks: 50.1 48.6 39.6 40.8 49.2 49.3 Vehicle Noise: 56.8 55.0 51.8 47.2 55.7 56.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 12 27 57 123 CNEL: 13 28 61 132 Monday, November 07,2011 6.1-21 -D-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTIONMODEL Scenario: 2020 With Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Walnut Avenue Job Number.' 7984 Road Segment: Main St. to Third St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 4,000 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 400 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening I Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height. 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer. 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer. 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad). 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Road Grade. 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -5.42 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -22.66 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -26.61 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 54.7 52.8 51.0 44.9 53.6 54.2 Medium Trucks: 48.6 47.1 40.8 39.2 47.7 47.9 Heavy Trucks: 49.9 48.5 39.5 40.7 49.1 49.2 Vehicle Noise: 56.7 54.9 51.7 47.1 55.6 56.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA I 65 dBA I 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 12 26 56 121 CNEL: 13 28 60 130 Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-22 Scenario: 2020 With Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Walnut Avenue Job Number: 7984 Road Segment: e/o Third St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 2,300 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 230 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet Vehicle Type Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks. 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer: 110.0 feet Autos. 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer. 10.0 feet Medium Trucks. 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad). 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks. 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade: 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View. -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks. 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations Vehicle Type REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -7.82 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -25.06 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -29.02 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels(without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Nightj Ldn CNEL Autos: 52.3 50.4 48.6 42.5 51.2 51.8 Medium Trucks: 46.2 44.7 38.4 36.8 45.3 45.5 Heavy Trucks: 47.5 46.1 37.1 38.3 46.7 46.8 Vehicle Noise: 54.3 52.5 49.3 44.7 53.2 53.7 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 8 18 39 84 CNEL: 9 19 42 90 Monday,November 07,2011 6.1-23 ! : HIGHWAY NOISE ! • • ! Scenario: 2020 With Project Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Road Name: Third Street Job Number.- 7984 Road Segment: n/o Main St. Analyst: J.T. Stephens SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions(Hard= 10, Soft= 15) Average Daily Traffic(Adt): 1,900 vehicles Autos: 15 Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Peak Hour Volume: 190 vehicles Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15 Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Vehicle Mix Near/Far Lane Distance: 12 feet VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 100.0 feet Noise Source Elevations(in feet) Centerline Dist. to Observer.' 110.0 feet Autos: 0.000 Barrier Distance to Observer. 10.0 feet Medium Trucks: 2.297 Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Lane Equivalent Distance(in feet) Road Grade. 0.0% Autos: 109.950 Left View: -90.0 degrees Medium Trucks: 109.869 Right View: 90.0 degrees Heavy Trucks: 109.877 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance I Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -8.65 -5.24 -1.20 -1.04 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -25.89 -5.23 -1.20 -1.15 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -29.85 -5.23 -1.20 -1.43 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 51.4 49.5 47.8 41.7 50.3 50.9 Medium Trucks: 45.4 43.9 37.5 36.0 44.4 44.7 Heavy Trucks: 46.7 45.3 36.3 37.5 45.9 46.0 Vehicle Noise: 53.4 51.7 48.4 43.9 52.4 52.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour(in feet) 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA Ldn: 7 16 34 74 CNEL: 8 17 37 79 Monday, November 07,2011 6.1-24 APPENDIX 7.1 Off-Site Operation Related Noise Level Impact Calculations Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis ������� City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-03 Report.doc) cRossRAN STATIONARY •URCE NOISE PREDICTION`MODEL' Source: Restaurant Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Observer Location: R1 Job Number: 7984 Analyst: J. Stephens NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 40.0 feet Barrier Height. 6.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier.' 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Barrier Distance to Observer: 35.0 feet Noise Height: 4.0 feet Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 (20 =6 dBA per doubling of distance, 15 =4.5 dBA per doubling of distance) NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq Reference(Sample) 20.0 63.6 Distance Attenuation 40.0 -6.0 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) -7.9 Adjusted (Distance+ Barrier) 40.0 49.7 Monday,April 16,2012 STATIONARY • • e o • ® Source: Roof Terrace Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Observer Location. R1 Job Number: 7984 Analyst: J. Stephens NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 40.0 feet Barrier Height: 13.5 feet Noise Distance to Barrier: 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Barrier Distance to Observer.- 35.0 feet Noise Height: 4.0 feet Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 (20 = 6 dBA per doubling of distance, 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance) NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leg Reference (Sample) 20.0 63.6 Distance Attenuation 40.0 -6.0 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) -16.1 Adjusted (Distance+ Barrier) 40.0 41.5 Monday,April 16,2012 STATIONARYWURCE NOISEe • MODEL 5 Source: Air Conditioning Project Name: Pierside Pavilion Observer Location: R1 Job Number: 7984 Analyst. J. Stephens NOISE MODEL INPUTS Noise Distance to Observer 40.0 feet Barrier Height: 5.0 feet Noise Distance to Barrier. 5.0 feet Barrier Type (0-Wall, 1-Berm): 0.0 Barrier Distance to Observer. 35.0 feet Noise Height: 3.0 feet Observer Height(Above Pad): 5.0 feet Observer Elevation: 0.0 feet Noise Source Elevation: 0.0 feet Drop Off Coefficient: 20.0 (20 =6 dBA per doubling of distance, 15 = 4.5 dBA per doubling of distance) NOISE MODEL PROJECTIONS Noise Level Distance (feet) Leq Reference (Sample) 100.0 51.8 Distance Attenuation 40.0 8.0 Shielding (Barrier Attenuation) -7.6 Adjusted (Distance+ Barrier) 40.0 52.2 Monday,April 16,2012 This Page Intentionally Left Blank APPENDix 8.1 Construction Related Reference Noise Levels Database Pierside Pavilion Improvements Noise Impact Analysis �® City of Huntington Beach, CA(JN:07984-03 Report doc) cr�oRssRAN RCNM User-s Gaide Construction Noise Pi-ediction Table 1. CA/T equipment noise emissions anclacowztleil usage factors dawbase, GAIT Norse, Emission Reference Levels and Usage Factors ,L00narna: EQUIPI-ST.As revised,7126105 Acoustical Spec T21.560(Actual Measure c No.of Actual Impact Uie Factor 1-max�50ft 1 Lmax @ 50ft Data Samples Eguipment 12esWu$Ipn Lnenl>5 HP No 50WA- N 0 84 2,1 84 36 gad 7 No 40 372 -_,�A Bar Bender 20 80 -NIA 0 N!A- -N;A- 0 t7 4,�--_-I__--I mooring Jack Po"r Unit Chain Sa�v No 20 85 1 4 46 84 _Clam Shovel -P qmShgvel(0 0 Yes 20 tompactor round No 20 80 L83 57 Compressor(air) No 40 so 78 is Concrete Batch Plant No 15 83 -NA 1, - 0 Concrete Mixer Truck 0 40 _Concrete Pump Truck o I 20 -- 82 81 30 -�g�-rete Slw�- No=:1 0 90 90 55 Crane No 1 16 85 81 405 Dozer NO 40 85 82 55 Drill Rig Truck No 20 84 79 22 Drum Mixer No 50 86 80 _Pyfr�pjruck No 0 84 1— Z6_ 31 Excavator _ No 40 85 81 170 Flat Bed Truck i No 40 84 i 74 "--'--4 Front End Loader 0 79 96 81 19 50 70 —73 74 Gr No 40 85 83 0 L n 40 85 1 -NIA- 0 Grapple on ba 3 No 40 85 1 87 1 Hori7Rq!qVBorirnHA.Jack No 25 80 82 nd Break JRam as 10 NIA_- 0 mpa Ict Pile Driver Yes 20 95 101 11 Jackhammer Yes 20 85 69 133 No Mounted Impact Hammer(hoe ram) Yes 20 pavement Scarafier No 20 85 90 2 Paver No 50 85 77 9 —Pic No kup Truck 1 40 55 1 75 1 Pneumatic Tools No i 50 85 I 8 50 T7 81 17 Refrigerator Unit Na- 82 Rivil BusteM�py!g_9un 20 79 Rod Mill No 20 Roller No 20 85 1 80 Sand Blasting.,(Pingle Nozzle) No 20 85 ge 9 No 40 85 84 12 Shears I 40 —-,--,85 96 urr 100 78 8 50 82 —jio 75 Soil Mix Drill Riq 5107 Tractor t!o 40 $4 t,VA- 0 Vacuum Excavator(Vac-truck) No 40 85 --- ---1497— Vacilurr,Street Swospt-E No 11) 80 82 1s V,,,�ntflalion Fan No100 85 79 13 frbrat Co fete Mixer NO I Z i6r=ry Pile Driver No J.Q 95 -101 44 W g., A VI/Wer I Torch No 40 73 74 3 J-3 8.1-1 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Exhibit At: CA Codes (shc:8300-8309) Pagel of 2 STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE SECTION 8300-8309 8300. This part may be cited as the Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easements vacation Law. 8301. Unless the provision or context otherwise requires, the definitions in this chapter shall govern the construction of this part. 8302. "Adoption" of a resolution includes passage or enactment of a resolution. 8303. "Clerk" includes a person or officer who is the clerk of a legislative body. 8304. "Legislative body" means: (a) In the case of a county or city and county, the board of supervisors. (b) In the case of a city, the city council or other body which, by law, is the legislative body of the government of the city. (c) In the case of the California Transportation Commission, the commission. 8305. "Local agency" means a county, city, or city and county. 8305.5. "Public entity" means a local agency or the California Transportation Commission. 8306. "Public service easement" includes all or part of, or any right in: (a) A right-of-way, easement, or use restriction acquired for public use by dedication or otherwise for sewers, pipelines, polelines, electrical transmission and communication lines, pathways, storm drains, drainage, canal, water transmission lines, light and air, and other limited use public easements other than for street or highway purposes. (b) An easement or right of a type described in Section 8340. 8306.5. "Public utility" means a public utility as defined in http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=shc&group=08001-09000&file=83... 9/13/2012 CA Codes (shc:8300-8309) Page 2 of 2 Section 216 of the Public Utilities Code. 8307. "Resolution" includes an ordinance. 8308. "Street" and "highway" include all or part of, or any right in, a state highway or other public highway, road, street, avenue, alley, lane, driveway, place, court, trail, or other public right-of-way or easement, or purported public street or highway, and rights connected therewith, including, but not limited to, restrictions of access or abutters' rights, sloping easements, or other incidents to a street or highway. 8309. "Vacation" means the complete or partial abandonment or termination of the public right to use a street, highway, or public service easement. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=shc&group=08001-09000&file=83... 9/13/2012