Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Local Government Coastal Management Improvement Grants - Ons
A,Ihorrta0 to PuCltsh Advo,tisements of 311 kind:including public notices by oceraa 01 the Superior Court of Qranqu County, , Cahfnrma. Number A•6211• dated 29 September, 1961• and A.24631.datrl 11 June, 1963. ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange • o.c 0*e44A AeNIUM/CNMM mew N0W• � I.t'js�gtp`w= I am a Citizen of the United States and a reside:lt of r pe,teiat� '" the County aforesaid; 1 am over the age of eighteen i�.NOTI., 91S H19RK8Y �IYEN.11r1 IM.1AaAAlrgM years.*and not a party to or (nterested.in the below iliaanCMrCaartsfarA low apu 1W16* in,IntIMCrr►- entitled matter. 1 am a principal cierk of the Orange W:Ch�noW,al,ow""Wo-, Coast DAILY PILOT. with which is combined•the �:�r = Ng1on aaaclt.Cs1t1WIMa;or! t NEWS-PRESS,`a newspaper cvf general circulation, W4 at r� printed and published in the City of Costa Mass. I t am parearrs«+w..IMl.le ba t Coun•y of Orange. State of California, and that a f ,t►twr.•10 feet F Notico of public Hearing t aararwa L Cetrslat�+r�t' � . of which copy attached hereto is a true and complete copy, wes printed and published In the Costa Mena, kiva a1e1p'e U- >:, al►tiae?slut!I Milli:t/Ill Newport Beach. Huntington Beach. Fountain Valley. NM•.1or,artalr.nat t111Mrp+r1 Irvine. the Saath Coast communities and Laguna p1t u;li`�N itfi Beach Issue, of said newspaper for _QZA time t►arlc+�!�wb� . , �, x2mNW iv*xarleh*fo wit the issues)of InoiiilitstA"L, •TAN�e�lrin�pfWtwi'wllh ■j JL if+aCMIMeAtaa+kMMlilNlal �• je�ii�Mi!�A�+dii •1r ti January 22 . 198_7 !. (' WOW,ail"Im Mw we an 94 r,i �i14 198 �aat:.i�lNtrtea��H� Is*r � PL* . 198 Isah aie tm,llatt w':11in1� All;W0011l14W.,}Motimt and i oft-poem oil ot of*a •�'.e+f;.O t i0 ai MIa C3ti CM'i�;�, 198 urart�alrtM.,Hwrlrgton! DOPWI cesmod4 1A W IIF 1 declare, under penalty of perjuryOW , that the +°0 +0' tt+q tlsft•i1Mi N .. ,.rt foregoing is true and correct. �p�„k,,�gry�.�=s ~•t? x.thmnrbis•a.�l.�. Executed on - •Tan„ar. 72 at Costa Mesa, California. Signature i� J - l j �t�• i PROOF OF PUBLICATION l- r r. • Publish 1/22/87 r ; NOTICE UP PUBLIC 1 E"G - - COASTAL GLINT APPLICATIONS NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN thet `the Huntington Beach-City Council will hold a pn: lic hearing in the Council Chamber at the.Huntiugton Beach Civic Ceuter, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, on they date .and at the time indicated below to receive and consider the statements of all persons who :rich to be heard relative to the application described below. DATE: February 2, 1987 TIRE: 7:00 P.H. SUBJECT: Local Goverwaent Coastal Management Improvement Grants APPLICANT: City of Huntington Beach PROPOSAL_: (1). Study to identify onshore aupport facilities and asseso the feaalbility of using the facilities for additional offshore oil development. (2) Development of extension of existing Bluff Top Park Westerly of Goldenwest Street. ENVIRONhCAL Siins: Compliance With the California Environmental Quality Act will be completed prior to great funds being disbursed. ON A copy of the {draft applicatiana arc on file is 'the Department of Development Serdices, 2000 Hain Street, . Huntington Beach, California 92648, for .inspection by the public. ALL INTERESTED:PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions -or oubaiit evidence jor.:or against.the application:as outlined above. All applicitiuns,' exhibits, and descriptions of this proposal are on file with the Office of. the City Clerk, 2000 Hain Street, Huntington . • Beach, California, for inspection by the public. HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL By: ticia.H. Wentworth City Clerk Phone (714) 536-5405 Dated 1/16/87 00 Y. `....._......» :.,ysura.�s,rws'awe+rya.�•�r...w.,...ww+....rss»w...+.w^""""^�"''w•...""".r".�..ry.16s `t - ' 1. _ r:I,. +- t, ,�, NOTICE`'•TO CLEP.K TO SCHEDULE'PUBI:iC HEARING I TE r ' ''' j a+j M 4 : /I -i.�;_;'.''t-,-_.ry"1..,-,1A,V�."-..., > f( f ;TO: CITY:: LERK''S OFFICE.,' . DATES '• . {r � ((11 - _ . y i FROMf s�'t''C",p �t • / ;' .r . . t t r` [ 4 r ', 4•7 /'p, ii 1. a r[r•,`.' •%'I 't•: ''ij,�.': :•-f. t .r` y. r` I ,a + ty'.1 ,. PLEASESCHEDULE A PU8l.IC'HEARING 115ING THE ATTACHED.L'k NOTICE FOR THE 4 i y 1. Tr .j --'dAY`'4F ' t ,.`.I98 . - . } r: t l j,` ::: 'i t' .� ` 1. ,'1'i. r•[ , t '.'•, .'fY. + ...,'r-4•..�I ) 4. y I+ tf rt ' t 't r AP.'s:are .attached r. I,, -rt t ) C Y7 i ). t. 1 i }s i'i•4 'l + r. -t , r S r ; ,t t tit AP's +will foIIcr1 - i f ,t "� "f i'+ 1 ,, r s f ..N o'• ' ',f r� y 0''A 5' y t i,+ t r r :,`i L-a ,, A t r ;; f.' I'. { .t 1 r�4y _r rS -r> .f'tt, r• e' )r t . 4 . :ti.-a c t.i 1 [1> t- +.- ti;4.r "1 - t. "r i. .S• + '.1 ., - l, 1...--.,t t r'S uj ! -rS L'6C! 3 tr�f 1{1 yy4•" ` , , 1 Initiated b' i 4 r }j L ) �) e r ,fiLtl i ct t, r - 1 1, -t r� .5,.. U!. �, .. tt t•. ,AnO.� % ; �. .v �i ... 'l trir y{;+-'i,.Y,fI t+ .,:1 fy' ;.+met+}-"I.ty;'a K ;rL"'�`�� C _ )L .I f 5'[ ..� 'i::•¢� :.,::� ".� _f .•I ,.`f. ' .:t"t t, }ltn,. i ,:.. ,, t'. S r'y rr. .;.��i.- 'ti,^r+ 1!! '"•�- •, Planonafii ' =°•, , fl r,t , - 4 k3 :�.`•• i 1-"t*,_. i J x':_'I�l:. :,.t. r _ S_=r ar + '1CC�{ "i)� ) i i 't?:. , t r, - r.;- t SSiO 7 :a , F}"F;;: ._ ,,, s01 1".`'.ja`:1+ 1'r1.t f 2 r F !t .,r. , "t r i t -Y't �t::.i',f rY} t' : �t'i_ r i. ' t t ) ;•y I1{ ., t +!'4A. 1. _�*f;;;, '■y� ,.' t ^+y^•r .i i. ). •1.• C .t,'}t 1 i 4• t bf �t''} 1t g ° • i., :q.i Lll ,sl, t *' . s :'.J:,. Planning: Aepartmerit- 1•,. _ a .,,'. , ;* f ;: `=as °ti: �«•"� °'.;,, _ k,ryr; '.r,. k:,'✓ + 1 • >['-.i='✓ � ; .13 :,-t t .Sri ..2a-:��Z.:y �t. ..!`' ^t+ti 4'• .�f.�/>r+"-tSi-?y C N%__, r t i,e >,• s t ,i:.+.t. ,,:,.tr > 'j;,r.,J 'N . s't r r: ..y .t > t -ti^ i*j , yY� +1 r• t t t t•'.,'7, .r•.. 5 .Z L r.r r ~�..� •. 1 '� a3 .. V i•i ')i 4[ , :Peti>:ion , d . Si j f <1 ~tr `.i r. ['. k1. ♦ '1.,lf f„ ' t t t:t: µ y t yyt :�. t ', , t 3 t. t r �'- C t rA [ C )>t CL��``��r+ 'jt.,,.k rt , { 7�. i..l ,), C �,��r' +« 1 t r .J'71. r-f r• �i + ,l_, t7 `°-.r I i r�- " ;r 'P'r�i4f1 ,;f. C r, ctI ,.^. 1 r -.� � f r ;*,/.S�r`l)* tt r r r- %" 7.. - r- '' r 1 i�. i ,>e!�-C �r r 4( ' '��^1, r,r .,47 .�"ti1••!f.1 tw •>. ' •" +.* 'pea -,, C..'` , ' r t t -t'J� ,+k}.'c', Cr j .tiy. f.l" l! i i"r h_}�,: y rr. u> [ r r I.- It t If y y l:r }.Z G1 ,.,; y.°y }" + 4, Y:' j:^=�'✓i.� _.S$r , r.T '=' ,, ��J t "rt t+ ;*J�,t. =t r m'1 `�'C* F�'" '��'%=�'; t�X' ' ',JC' °aS f'" j t ` t. `• i ,t. pp j,� `� �_ •1 "i :, r.t,-..II,C !r ;"� l"t t ,._ Ix� 'i "'"F',. �' a; t �il -�s]. .r�` r- y- Ythi o'^j ' i L `� � �. .rtr3'%y"'''•i-n 1,=,1.4`!j+ r� l[ii"1,,;t ',�'r?i�; 'r:!`$�r"i;i f.�C i •4 .•t,.•}7t > t 7 "^� tt)� 'J '`i; 1� :? '�• .>'.)••�' '1 ,i, '11{ ..r: ;' i+)i� 'ors: ,t�:ll��'�i r«/1 t1. .[, •iti`L..•' + `x! W;' 'i.._,, 1., ,1' y } t. . V "•,a. s' f t,:'�C.' .!tM.t.l i ' ' • •�°''=i:'t'r•. .� .. Lt .'!,:' �' }..• >:. I.. t 1. t. r; i �j�-'..5. + "r�4,•1 :,yr .' ! _=�•�;;s"..t ,;' � 1':;;'��:� �, ;�. A apttorx of�Enviror*46tal':SteWs�: (x)}- i'.*': .:�1;, , :e :; , �`=` ,� .'. ;�> , '.••'•' ,1.•• '� t 1 1[ 1 i .i.. } k t 17: :1 ` r 4 .ti yi f."". f ,'1/ 1} �•r1t1 , !,; "'i', Ir Y. ,., t @ t+ ° t .} • [ '.CJ 'jPr'i # C4t�t77 iftt},;l+ ;qr"'+. ilt r) :i+.z: "t }..• ti. 't <r ii,'t I..::f a�i i !` '�•�; � ;+1- i �{� P.�.. '1 5 .# tt 'r:,••r,.�" r:4, l ,;` ` _ ) Nas";�i ty"-Attorney.s`Office,,b"en , YES 'r NO I 'f ! •,;1 t {.,. [ , t,-• 't t t �,i h ' r:ihfaim' e'&'of:forthcoin ,public ., , r=, i' J t > „ t f, -, ,r t `> hearing?' F , )' >' ;`r) "5, 1 ,r yL,J.,r. t i r,f. ,•C ..r 1 t�► AA r :, �r..r r. - t. n ..•. ] /.,3'Cj�,. ! "�Refer'to �t- ri' • ''' Pl . , ' , ' i zf '::. :;�:��>� : r . 't I 4r , , .ir AI,i;, r �,,, anrii'rig" Departn�rtK=f Extension r _ ', x,- jy :I for{�dditiana�l. inforcaat'on:a �_ _ . _: �; "> >K 't.r:,1+.. A a-� 1 " 3} '�., J i f t ,= r t.4 e 1`3 '7 ' r:v ' 1 S 4' r, ,sty, i { i-At frt,-i '! -+ R-' :1"�t t .a. .. " I ,.. ".1 =:' + , s , . t Z•- Is;': ;" R If a cal• please transmit eXact.wording to be required'.in .ttie `1eg�1. 'i ,,; ;a #'T 2w i`.*t t <tr`�� '�M,14f� ;e '�:t..'• f ' `Y .S til 't:t ''�� r{� 'r.1tr-,t.I� 4 +i�,,. 1 ":z . �C t .i/2 i :. .. ■t , t ," i.+,•, t Y +f{".j a? rk i.: ,°AN APPEALABLE DEVELOPt1ENTi (COASTAL DEVELOPMENT.. PERMIT ?.r " -. 71 `:.ti1� f7"' i• -i• {' y 1 ..{4 ( -sty w••'," i i- -r ; C'fc I..�' S t w. C L , •Y! I," ,f) ! - •.i'" `r L -1ES r . I w y,•7 y t{+ .L1?: a tt a, .i� i •":f - t , , S {.. rr,."r. �� { i "•,. rt,' wt`;u f ` C,t i ,�, ' -✓ '= r"c F{ ) ) r ,'}. �1,• kt� 1 4 r : > •1 i' yr w' L .' ..t , tt i- . .. aZ .. ... `. . 7 t-.i..m_tip' ."I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COASTAL GRANT APPLICATIONS NOTICE IS• HEREBY;,GIVEN- that the Huntington'Beaah City' Council will hold a public hearing to the Council Chamber at the 'Huntington Beach Civic ,Center, 2000 Main-.Street, Huntington Beach,. California, on the date and at the -time indicated below to receive and consider the statements nt all persons who wish to be heard relative to the application described below. i DATE/TIME: February 2, 1987 — 7:00 PM APPLICATION 4: Local Government Coastal Management -` Improvement' Grants DESCRIPTIO,". (1) Study to .identify..onshore support facilities 06 and; assess 'the feasibility of using-.;.the facilities for additional offshore oil development. (2) Development of extenaioo of existing Bluff Top , Park westerly of Goldenwest Street to?PLrCANT:, City, of Huntington Bench ` ENVIRONMENTAL"STATUS: Compliance with the C41iforn'ia vi Enronmental,. Q u a I i y Act- will be 'completed prior to grant funds being disbursed., ,. ON FILE: A copy` of the draft applications are on file in the Department of Development Services, 2000 Main Street, Huntington, Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. . Alicia Wentworth ~ City Clerk Huntf ngton Beach City Council (7139d) .na.a.:"trYxa6:.^�wh+awa:Y'...z1•L.•:J'.:.ancrr-•a..v....i..=isiw^1%:.�•YAC.?�''"ita*rr"'.'w�"`►r+.....�-�—,'..M REQUE ST FOR CITY COUNCIL. ACTION Date Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submittedby: Charles W. Thompson, City Administratord-w'r Pr4wredby: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services t '0 A Subject: GRANT APPLICATIONS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT COASTAL MANAGEMENT IMPP.OVEMENT PROGRAM Comistont with Council Policy? y4 Yes j Now Policy or Exception Statement of Issue,Recommendation,Ana!ysis, Funding Soures,Alternative Actions,Attachments: RT ` STATEMENT OF ISSUE: 0n' Dacem'be r 15, , 1986, the City Council approved. Resol'utyon 574b authorizing the City Admini,strat"or ,to make application for grant fonds offered by the California State Secretary of Environmental Affairs. Final applications are due by February 'l5, 1987. Grant 1 is for an .invent:ory 'of onshore oil facilities and their relationehip to offshore oil development. Grant 2 is for preparation` of plans for and install'ation of ! landscaping and other amenities :too extend the existing '. Hlufftop park north of Goldenwest Street to the Bolsa Chica. . RECOMMENDXTION: Z No"action Is necessaryother than holding a public hearing on the two grant applications, `ANALYSIS; r The .Local ;dovernment Coastal Management Improvement Program grant rules ,require that a public hearing be held .before submittal of the final. application' order to receive any public comment. The two ` grant. applicatiora have been scheduled for the Council agenda as a public, hearing item in. order to comply with this application requirement.. Usual noticing procedures have. been followed. The notice was published in the Daily Pilot 'ten days prior to the Council meeting. in addition, . notices were mailed to the following groups or agencies who have. indicated an interest. in `•receiving Information on .coastal" 'iasues: Chamber of Commerce, Board of } r Realtors, Amigos• de Bolsa Chica, Friends of the Huntington Wetlands, Coastal Conservancy, and the Huntington Beach Company. The final application must be accompanied by a summary of any testimony or comments that are received, 00 � , { r Plo 4194 S T yr, ; �-- VUNDING SOURCE: The grant program provides funding for .80% of the project costs. The reniair,ing 20% will be absorbed wii:hin the budget of the respective departments. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: If a. public hearing it; not held, the City will have to withdraw -from further competition for the grant monies. ATTACHMENTS: .1. Request for Council Action datt:d Decem!-ar 15, 1986 2, Resolution 5740 r 30 Pin al Grant Applications . t JWP:JA:kla A ^ ` I RCA - 2/2/87 -2- (7185d) ,-� I. --- --•---.......-.,..•.......+w,W,.y...G.Y:.,r:-..T:�.....r..,:w....,a--.ti::.:.�.::::;,,:F,..g�.. .,.w _ .._,._... i.- . `f ,•. . fit•. • ,. �• _• • ' • • '.`i i' '. . ' REQUEa FOR C 1TY COUNC ACTION Date December 98_6__ Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepersdby: James W. Palin, Director, Development Services Subject: GRANT APPLICATIONS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT COASTAL MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Consistent with Council Policy? Yes ( I New Policy or Exception Suument of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: The, Department of Development Services ic:seeking City,—Counril appio�al foie the', submittal: o£ .twa'draft applicati"ons for grant Funds avai'lible' from th"e- California State Secretary of Environmental .; ;Affairs. Draft,: applications are due December 15, 1986, although-* the City, has obtained permission to express mail the applications and accompanying'materials tomorrow, December 16, 1986. Grant 1 is for .an' inventory of onshore ail facilities and their relationship to offshore oil development. Grant 2 is. for'preparat:fon, of plans .for and install�ation...of landscaping:"and, other amenities .to extend the; existing BlOfftop park north of Goldenwest' Street to the Bolsa Chica. RECOMMENDATION: Statf 'rcommends that the `City Council apptove the attached resolution authocizfrig the City Administrator to make application to the grant program offered by the California State Secretary of Environmental Affairs. ' The.'grants, require that..a public hearing be' held, after submittal of the draft 'applicatiori but• before submittal of the final application in order to" receive ally public comment. Staff further recommends 1 that this public he+firing be set for the Council meeting of Fetr►aery 2, 1987. (The final application "is due February 15, 1987. ) ,ANALYSIS: The ,grant xprogram provides funding for projects begun. after May 1987 and completed- by May 1989. The grants require 20% matching funds by the City, which will. include both direct cash and in-kind costs of City personnel working on the projects. i �I FIO 4/54 u J Total cityyIs Protect Cost 20% Share Gr'ant ,1: 'Inventory of $ 13,900 *2780.00 facllft es Grant-2: -Extension of $525,000 $1051000 'Tu M-p Park Funds..sre. provided`on a`'quPrterly basis' throughout the, project! 16plamentation:.per iod and can' be ar.anged t;o.'-be- received in advance of work complete'd. .in: each quarter so that interest income will not be lost while waiting for funds to be reimbursed. Thevprojects-,.w112 benefit '"the. citizens of Huntington4'Beach as;,; , follows. Grant.:l;.wi11 enable;.the City' to c`btaifi better knowledge of both", its onshore'-and, offshore.oil . developments;and . their:,iiAegratian in o"r"der, to.-.mitigate any:'adverse impacts of future 'development. Gran t',:Zyi1l. enhance ocean views and increase: �:ecreational oppar'tunf ties`for. coastal" visitors. ., An information display will. provide education .to the' public regaiding .offshore oil activities. Botih:pro�ects';relate to eyi'eting City programs, Grant 1= wi11. serve asp a;follow-up; to<past . studies that .have-:�included• oil spill �., Pont ingency''°;plar�ni.�g, f..iscal impact of oil operations :and enhanced recovery. technolc gy ;. Grant; 2 'continues the. landscaping'',improvements completed 'in' 1984. that established the Elufftop Park between Ninth Street and Goldenwest Street. ''ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Xompliance with the requirements of the California, Environmental . Quality .4ct will need 'to be--' made prior to . the allocatiion' of `grant- >> funds. . Grant 1 is exempt from CEQA requirements. Grant 2 will likely have a Negative Declaration. FUNDING' SOURCE: .: Aa deEcribed above and detailed in the attached Fiscal Impact Statement. 'ALTERNATIVE ACTION; :.i. Modify grant requests as desired. } ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resoiution 2. Fiscal Impact Statement 3. Draft. Grant ApLilications JWP:.TA:t l RCA - 12/15/86 -2- (6787a) CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH LOCALS 30VSRNMENV COASTAL ,.:,. MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DRAFT-APPrICAm ijN FOR XSMSMENT R OIL FACILITIES THAT MAY SERVICE OFFSHORE OIL PRODUCTION APPLICANT: City of Huntington beach 'r MAILING ADDRESS: City ot: Huntington Beach Development Services 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, California '92648 CONTACT PERSON: Jeanine Frank, Senior Planner FISCAL MANAGEMENT CONTACT: Robert Franz, Chief of Administrative. , Services PROJECT NARRATIVE: A. DESCR1,PTION: The,'purpose of the grant .is to mitigate the adverse onshore impacts of increased offshore oil production off the City's shoreline. B. 'OBJECTIVES: The..:ob�ective of. thepraject is to inventory the City's ' onshore facilities and determine if the facilities can support additional offshore oil development.. .This information could be , used by. the.City. and the State, as well az private companies, ' to 'aid "in locational decisions for future offshore oil developments. C., PAST AND FUTURE OFFSHORE EIiERGY ACTIVITIES: There are currently five platforms offshore from Huntington Beach. To support, these platforms, there exists in the:City: an oil tanker unloading terminal, tank farms, and a pipeline network twat includes two offshore pipelines and six onshore pipelines. The tank farms i.nd onshore pipelines also serve the City.'s extensive onshore ail development. The extent to which future offshore energy activities. would impact the existing onshore facilities needs to be determined prior to any new development. For example, community safety concerns dictate that the City assess the Fire Department's capabilities of handling an increased demand for their services and equipment. .............,.�..-- r PROJECT NARRATIVE (cont'd) Currently, there are very serious concerns. about the possibility of collisions involving platforms and tankers which ., could result in ail spills. A spill could have a great impact upon the City's popular recreational beaches, sensitive wetlands and inland economic resources which rely or, tourism. The eight riles of beaches in Huntington Reach are ..easily accessible and are visited by an estimated 13.5 million people per year. The benefit of a safe coastal area is enjoyed on a large regional scale. Resf.dents throighout Orange County,. as well as tourists nationwide, frequent the City's beaches. The City also hots an annual wnrld championship surfing contest. The.,City of Huntington Beach. actively protects and�cnjances its coastal resourc'es. .:. A "Local Coastal Plan",-was: certified in March .g985 by the'.•California Coinmission which, established development guidelines and regulations to assure that', coastal properties are' developed�. in a..manner that will implement the '+ "California Coastal Act of 1976". The' downtowh""area is currently undergoing Jnajor redevelopment efforts which will greatly increase an economic bane which relies on tourism.: An increase of offshore oil development and. related onshore support activities could greatly impact this L. `. resource. '`ei Some`of the issues;that 'have: been addressed' in'.'the past include: ,oil spill =;continoency planning;', fiscal impact;.-of oil operations .and enhanced.,oii- recovery technology: _ However, no study, has ever identified the C3ty's onshore resources, and, facilitieo. L Further study is also needed to address the possibility that additional facilities ,may be sited here to support offshore oil development. Planning efforts can then. be directed towards the mitigation of adverse Impacts. D. PRODUCTS OR DELIVERABLES: 1) A written, report assessing the appropriateness of the use of the City's onshore facilities to support future offshore oil development. E. EXPECTED BENEFITS TO THE CITY AND REGION: The City will benefit fLom_ .this project by obtaining, a better knowledge of both its onshore and offshore oil 'developments and their integration. . This knowledge can then be used to 'develop plans to 'mitigate any adverse impacts of future development in Orange County in general and the City of Huntington Beach in particular. r PROJECT NVARATIVE (cont'd) F. CURRENT CITY ACTIVITIES RELATED TO OFFSHORE OIL The-,.City_ of Huntington Beach performs a substantial role'.'in the: regulation of oil production facilities. , An extensive '"Dil Code". contained in., the City-'s Municipal Code:: stablishes z authority for controlling many: aspects of .oilt'production in the City:-.`•,, The City iseues :drilling, redrill•irgy;;and, reworking permits for ,a3.1 :wells •in .the City.`.and sub�3ects ."a •ll;;oi1 production related. equipment. to annual':inspeat on- b,1 the Fire, , I; Departm6it. On'-shore equipment used for transporting, storing or refining offs shore_produced oil -Is i-ncludea' in, the City's "oil" Code" jurisdiction andsis annually, ibspected for compl3.ance regulations.; A stringent landscaping code:'.is •',: applied to such; equipment::located in' developed or•, City- park: . areas. The. City.also 'prepa!:es, and up date$:`:detailed `contingency ` plans for emergencies generated by off-shore: oL onshore,. oil equipment. Lastly, the 'City carefully monitors and comments upon all new propo:ials for off -shore oil production. ; G. ti OTHER FUNDING SOURCES: ' . The City's General. Fund may provide. funding. H. ALTERNATIVES: zi }• There is no other way to identify our onshore resources. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COSTS: =' The City's estimate 'is that one person would need to; be employed full time For twenty weeks in order to, complete -the _ study. The following is a breakdown of the estimated project cost: Personnel 800 hours at $17.00/hour _ 13,600' Material - Pr inting,rintin Graphics, Photography r c• g, phi s, 200 Expenses Travel 100 $13,900 --3- (6823d) PROJECT NARRATIVE (cont'd) i f .t WORK STATEMENT AND SCHEDULE l OIL F_A_C_ILITIES ASSESSMENT t TASKS COMPLETION SCHEDULE I 1. Infoimaition ,gathering on current and July 1987 future offshore oil development. a. Production levels; number of gallons per day b. Equipment; present and future needs =� c. Projected ail production time 2. Information gathering on current r August 1987 t and future onshore, oil .renourcesZT development. offshore oil develo • that support h P a. Tank farm capabiliities �! b, Pipeline capabilities c. Industrial ermit'Lzd uses. appropriate.. t _ P _ s or. o • onshore ruc i t and available for con t k facilities. d. Safety standards and fire prevention systems that handle offshore oil development i 3. Assess appropriateness of City's onshore September.''1987 oil resources with regard to offshore oil developments. 4. Analyze information with respect to impacts October 1987 on the City's coastline. j ` S. Prepare fina3 written report of findings. Octoher ,1987 K. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS: Prior t6, receipt' of .grant .funds, compliance with the requirerents of the California Environmental Quality Act will be made. The ` study would either be classified as not a project or would be 1 categorically Exempt from CEQA provisions. -4- (6823d) �I . r I1wrM,r ��py.�w "^ LIA•2'.If+'i.MYd+i�'tl`.wY�+•'^ wrMR+I CL�1Y.'Ltr.«M✓-•.M1':°•431 t:'awe'J�..wi1:7.1—JT.;i+Yw•.lY.ww,�(1MYt'MTorWrvA++`�^`�'" "� s • LOCAL GOVERNkkN -COASTAL MANAGYKEW'f"I77'PRITPL" 1ENT FR"UGRAM DRAFT-APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF BLUFFTOP PARK APPLICANT: City of, Huntington E2ach Development services 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 CONTACT: Jeanine Frank .Senior Planner FISCAL OFFICER: Robert Franz Deputy City ACministrator/Chief of Administrative Services PROJECT NARRATIVE A. DESCRIPTION: The existin'g'�bluffs along the ocean side of Pacific Coast Higna—y, north o .Goldenwest Street, are unimproved. The unattractivenesf.s of the. site, is further :m��r=ed` by. the existence of; offsho`re'oi1; drilling platforms.: City staff• has .concluded that landecaping 'the bluff top would substantially 'improve. the., . area ►,y mitigating ,the vifsi6ility of both. offshore" oil . platforms and onshore. oil .wells that directio;ial &ill.',for' offshore. oil. The:, landscaping''would serve to";enhance thA 'appearance and increase the regional:.recreational Opportunities -for.: this coastal. land. The landscape improvements would, include. the..instal-lation of:.... a irrigation system, grass, ' palm trees, planteis,. benches# .. picnic tables,.-.and -safety railing. A public information display would be incorpo-rated in the improvements which could educate the . public about offshore oil activities. . As discussed below, the project would become an extension of the existing Blufftop Park located between Ninth Street and Goldenwest Street. B. OBJECTIVES: 1. Mitigate view impacto of offshore oil development by creating a landscaped public vista. 2. Provide the public information about offshore oil activities. C. PAST AND FUTURE OFFSHORE ENERGY ACTIVITIES: The City of Huntington Beach has been impacted by past offshore oil activities to a greater extent than most coastal cities. There are five platforms which are visible from the coastline: three are in federal waters, two are in state waters. Pipelines run ashore from the trio state platforms. Offshore oil development has not only caused visual blight, but has subjected our coastline to the risk of an oilspill. Currently, there are very serious concerns about the possibility of collisions .involving platforms and tankers which could result in oft spills. A spill could have a great impact upon the City's popular. recreational beaches, sensitive wetlands and inland economic resources which rely on tourism. The eight miles of beaches in Huntington Beach are easily &ccessible and are visited by an estimated 13.5 million people per year. The benefit of a safe coastal area is enjoyed on a large regional scale. Residents throuSbout Orange County, as well as tourists -nationwide, frequent the .City's beaches. The City also holds an annual world championship surfing contest. Many oil wells are located along our coastal bluffs. Most of these wells ,directi.onally drill for offshore oil. The City has been very concerned about the appearance of these areas. As a result, a major effort was launched in 1981 to improve our ocean view by ridding the bluffs of old ,pipelines. and. by'landscaping and ,!bcreening the wells. The existing .Blufftopp. Park between . Ninth. Street and Goldenwest was completed. in N8. 4.. . It provides scenic vistas for the 1.3.5 million •visitors annually.. who enjoy our active and passive beach recreation opportunities.. The, proposed project would become an extension of the Blufftop Park from Goldenwest north to the Bolsa Chica, providing additional landscaping and screening for oil wells and mitigating the visual impacts of present and future offshore oil development. D. PRODUCTS OR DELIVERABLES: 1. Plans for the Blufftop Extension 2. Work Program 3. Cost Estimates 4. Completed Blufftop Improvements E. EXPECTED BFNEFITS TO THE; CITY AND REGION: The improved blufftop. will provide enhanced ocean views and recreational opportunities to the 13.5 million visitors annually. The educational display will provide -the public information about offshore oil act ' '.ties. P. CURRENT CITY ACTIVITIES RELATED TO 'OFFSHORE OIL: The City of Huntington Beach performs' a substantial role in the regulation of oil production facilities. An extensive "Oil Code" contained in the City's Municipal Code estabii;ihes the authority for controlling many aspects of oil production in the City. The City issues drilling, redrilling and reworking permits for all wells in the City rnd subjects all oil production related equipment to annual inspection by the Fire Department. On-shore equipment used for Iran:;porting, storing or refining off shore produced oil is included in the City' s "Oil Code" jurisdiction -z- (6820d) C, t, and f annually inspected for compliance with 'ope'rational and environmental safety, noise and aesthetic regulations. A stringent landscaping code is applied to. such equipment located in, developed or, City park areas. The. City also prepares and. .. updates detailed contingency plans for emergencies generated by off-shore or onshore oil equipment. Lastly, the City carefully monitors and comments upon all new proposals for off-shore oil production. G. OTHER FUNDING SOURCES: The Coastal Conservancy, County of Orange and. oil companies and private citizens have provided funds in the past for the Blufftop., Park. These sources could be pursued again. H. ALTERNATIVES: The only alternative would be to not construct the,.project.. In this case, u.isighkly, barren oil wells will continue to degrale ocean views and more attention will be focused on the negative aspects of the platforms. I. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT COSTS: The cost of design engineering, including plans and ' specifications, is estimated to cost approximately $25,060. Construction cots including contingencies, will total an estimated $500,000. WORK STATEMENT AND SCHEDULE BLUPFTOP PARK TASKS COMPLETION SCHEDULE t 1. Preliminary Engineering and De3ign a. Development of conceptual plan, November 1987 plans for p7,oposed information display. b. Obtain approval of conceptual plan December 1987 from City Council c. Obtain Coastal Commission approval February 1988 ' d. Preparation of final plans and May 1988 specifications e. Put project out to bid June 1988 f. Evaluate bids received and July 1988 award construction contract x. -3- (6820d) i,.,,..,..r^1r.'[XT+iArrrn-»—;^..�__.�-,.. ...-.. _• --- ..,......................�,....._-.,-........w..,..............w.,.......,a..•..,.e.+..»�........_...._.� .,..........•....��- TASKS COMPLETION SCHEDUL:{ 2. Construction Phase a. Clearing and grubbing the site September 1980 �. b. Fine grading of bluff top September 1988 c. Installation oF. .concrete flatwork October 1988 and irrigation system d. Installation of safety railing, November 1988 benches and picnic tables ' e. Preparation of soil for plant December 1988 materials f. Planting of shrubs and trees January 1989 g. Seeding grass February 1989 h. Installation of information display May 1989 ' on offshore oil activities K. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICABLE LA`TS AND REGULATIONS: ; Prior to receipt of grant ft-tlds,, compliance with the requirements i of the California Environmental Quality Act will be made. Due to t; the location of the proposed landscaping improvements, approval } ' by the Coastal Commic.iion will be required. 1: p ,. f.•I t 1. _q_ (6820d) �yeraawnM++.►-•+..��,..•....... +w+1...r.-,y.M6•.l r+i 1w..:�aTiZ.i"/.'.��'�i..l{I(M/'�••� .�.•,.•wY'K.a wf4ilH.Y II.SA.T.+h, I�•Nt"�]k.A Fiat{SFiiJ+.'•ri✓{Aw tirfMl!`1.J!t�►\I"i�,Xti�•!.�•i{isZM� �:- 1 Authorized to Publish/dverusaments of&I k.nds including puth c nolices by Decree of the Superior Court of Orange county, .�" In M California, Number A•6214, dated 29 Peotnmber. 1961. and wI , t A•24031,dated 11 June. 1953. NG?�+ P i Ott .l cl'rY cov STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange "Vwbwv cow& a l�,1 ey as W4""U ON M l paM ,»M ea e+K+tr�M,Mn aneC1 ll Cxry�r+ I am a Caizen of the United States and P resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or Interested in the below �WAFM+t µ° ' c._..,,,,A/ TO•,.;:;;. entitled matter. I am a principal clerk of the Orange oflff�u, aoftttTru• Coast DAILY PILOT, with which Is combined the F1111 tr , f10 04.:::+:; NEWS-PRESS, a newspaper of general circulation, tp eHl�:tpa�p,�ffstisaY printed and published in the City of Costa Mash, VMbe how brlhot ,0061n•, an of the pry of Nunmp{eh County of Orange, State of California, and that fll iae4a+t:t l"'gee .t3atr►retf �ChafitDer-OIr'thG•.Q Notice of p"h 1 {ter• 1r o3r.i,]JX,...I 2jLL�11+ [et04 V)o voter Ot dIQ Ku or ' To Planning Commission erooeatftonl w �IOfe an 1Aon.�90,fi•r an of which copy attached hereto Is a true and complete 0* to ". copy, was printed and published In the Costa Mesa, la,14 Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Mont poffal;No..%e 4 0 9 coastal C►rlMatapnw I Per. Irvine, the South Coast communities and Lajuna (I'Ilyl MN �e ;M 104- Beach Issues of said newspaper for 1 tune I0��"a1 f2dfM"WEvitxettaft to wit the Issues) of tlsa 1'!trmt;W.64-10 Car 1r++tly�of 74-vott rporit W ltdf 19 tk1$-b0*O=wm `nnc+:lf:aw•bee>rvan wytr J u l u 4 . 198 5 aa1.n dM aver t park v W,,,..Wxo tG a noel. mum "c M 45 1414L.Wo 198 irrtt+tna sim of t-�W �w90 in, 13e1 � 1a �N.non+eefelrte brabra xr ..?A�t�appi�osrC�rtsM , 198 eddreM!ten ttwa�nlrt�i b , P!lr�tteecf>, 198 lkere 1106 is atta r t�satin itnp artp..*Xwssasthelr for Or t .._., 198 �lxlfi�r�'lnAo`riste�yt';rnir .'� be obtto�1 from tt»otlt,¢s the� rxertr,•!'JPO 1�Wn declare, under penalty of perjury, that the !t►aeatzr,�h�:•�r •�:,,.';�,. foregoing Is true and Correct. :."' 'i= �tACH.�.w A'yta,trl. July 5 5 1t7i►ttt;t Executed on at Costa Me al California. `a kad Signature 00 0 CT) Alt:- S. • .. � i 1, CITY OF HLJnJTINB"t ON BEACH ' 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK •a July 16, 1985 j. 4' Mola Development Corp. 8072 Adans Ave. Huntington @each, CA 92646 ' City Council of the'City of Huntington-6each at 'its:regular !a meeting.held Monday, July 15, 1985 granted your appeal .to the - ?' Planning Commission denial of Coastal Development. Permit No. 854. ' The City Council approved, with findings, Coastal Development Permit No. 85-4. : Please contact the Development Services Department for further ;t information. , ALICIA H. WENTWOR'TH, CITY CLERK ' y .4' j onnie Brockway, Deput cc: James Paiin, Development Services Director ` t • I,I .T C IT.doptiorv,:71I.69G••52?71 . �' ��'' .^+FL+t!a�'�r a}i:."Cq+!'+'"^"�__...�.._�^�'.^_.•+wMir :+,vLa.�a.r.s«.++.+..,....--».......e..n w..«+..•....—........«+w. ��.;f JLJ,Me CITY OF HU NTINGTON B :ACH INTER-DEPARTMEN r COMMUNICATION ►ukfooc"St4c" HONOR ABLE ,MAYOR BAILEY AND From ROBERT C. SANGSTER To MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL deputy City Attorney t Subject j Data July 12, 1983 ,til6la Condominium Pro ect, - Agenda Item D-2a, July 13, 1933 Car Davenport Marina Thr• staff has recommended approval of Coastal Development. Permit No. 83-4. The action of the Planning .Commission was to deny, the permit-(if ter, a 3-3 tie vote),- The Planning Commission was concerned abrut a number of things, Including density, particularly in view of the oaplicant's admission that his Immediate plan was to rent out the condos, rather than sell them, and parking. -' Their finding was as follows: "Although the proposed project can be provided with Infrastructure In a manner teat is consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan the Impact of .the proposed 103 unit 0416 residential project an the adjacent streets will be adversely ri� 1 impacted by additional on street parking." In our view, the staff has analyzed this ,permit Issue correctly. The project apparently meets the standards of the Downtown Specific Plan. The city's LCP has been approved by the Coastal CommissIan . The Planning Commission found that the development met these standards when,CUP 84-19 was approved It would be Inconsistent to now deny the Coastal Permit, since the project meets our approved coastal plan. Further, there Is no legal requirement that an owner- sell condos, or that condos be occupied by owners. • ' From a legal standpolrit, the staff.'s proposed findings are supportable. Council's consideration should relate to whether the project meets coastal standards, . • Incliating access and r creational policies. OBErRT C. SANGSTER Deputy City'Attorney 4.:. w«....r.•.. �.rL�+••'.Li's*.uw•r..«.,......n-...+..sr..,r.¢eA,•kx.•.C•'7.•.:..t.i'wr.:�r.�.;•,•z«n.+,_.A..:.a rt L=:,.�{•,yl..i'L:4.:.iT rt u.�+r.,.....:.1 rYY�:+.i0'•.,w.•w.�..nw.•w.vr.yy'tts[!.1'«.l�•SL➢41:i1q}7R. t: REQUE 103 . C� CICAUTION REVISED . Submitted to: Honor City Coancil Submitted fly: Charles W. Thompson, City Administrator Prepared by. James W. Falin, Director, Development Services , ' . Subject: COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-4 (APPEAL) Consistent with Council Policy? DC`{ Yes ( ] New Policy or Exception : Statement of Issue, Recommendation,Analysis, Funding Source,Alternative Actions,Attachments: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Transmitted for your consideration ie, an .appea`l of . the Planning Commission's denial of Coastal Development Permit No. 85-4 which analyzed specific local coastal issues 'related- to a 105-unit condominium project on 3.07 acres of property on the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway between 17th. and 13th. Streets. RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commi,sion action and recommendation: On June 1$, 1985_ the Planning Commission DENIED Coastal ' Development Permit No. 85-4. ON, MOTION BY- LIVENGOOD AND SECOND BY PORTER, A MOTION TO DENY COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-4 WAS AFr_:OVED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Livengood, Schumacher, Porter, Rowe. NOES:, Erskine, Mirjahangir ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Winchell Chairman Livengood noted that, he had changed his vote to break the c]eadlock ta' aZlow the applicant an opportunity to appeal the decision. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: 1 . Although the proposed project can be provided with infra .. structure in a ;fanner that is consistent with the Coastal Land Use , Plan the impact* of the proposed 105 unit residential ,, project on the adjacent streets will be adversely impacted by ti additional on-street parking. Staff recommends that the"City Council approve Coastal •Development r Permit. No. 85--4. Ick,?. No 4164 :.'.'. '!"r'�� 1"'w-+ " "�:`t-�st.....xsa erw..w...•.v.c:. .,L _....., ... u..•........... .......::.:r-t.a . n . �. ' ::a [�'.:;::�.:u;v�+F�"' i�. .. •'s. c... ' ,.�. .,.. •:s w.w.�:.rs....a,.sw+....k.. .,iv�..+ ..«�..«.w..a.+»arnsk�wr,.•.+a.....+...... Y ANALYSTS: On September 6, 1984, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No.. 84--19 and Tentative Tract No. 12238,_a requeiit to construct 185-unit condominium project.:,on 3. 05 acres;"of property an the .inland side of Pacific Coast Highway between 12th. and l3th. Streets. The project is a one lot subdivision consisting. of 74 one-bedroom units, 12 one--bedroom and den units,-, l4 ;twu-bedroom units, to be constructed over a •...two-level parking"stiuciure to a maximum tie`lght of 45 feet. At the time, of approval• of. these.' applications, the City's ILocal Coastal Plan MCP) had not .been " certified by the Coastal Commission. Therefore, the applicant was unable to .concurrently apply for the necessp!ry.;Coastal" Development r Permit (CDP)., - After the Coastal Commission. certified the City,'.s; i LCP, the applicant filed for the required CPD in order to complete the entitlement process. on June 18, 1985 the Planning Commission denied the .applicants request for a CDP based on concerns regarding height, bulk, density ard parking. A,,,Coastal, Development Permit is. required for any. development within the coastal zone.:which is neither 'ex#.�mpt nor categorically excluded. The subject site is .located, in an, area desig►�ated`by: the Coastal Commi"ssio " as an 'Appealable Development, ' which is - defined as 'all area between -the sea and the . first public road •paralleling '. t e e within three �u nixed feet of the inland extent of a h s a or thin r t r h i n n beach or mean high tide line of sea where there is no beach, y whichever is the greater distance. ' The CDP is.,designed to give :spec+ial''at ten ion . to ,those issues deemed tj of::imprrtance by the California Coastal Act and the City',s,'Certified Land Use Plan. These include coastal access, visual resources., community facilities, hazards, energy, "density, height,, parking, signs End issues: relating to water, wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitats. The City's action on,.,a coastal development applii:at;on for. an appealable development . shall be deemed final and in effee't. when ten is working dt.y appeal period to the Coastal Commission has expired. As pant or ,the, origirial entitlement, .the, staff analyzed the project as it related to development standards contained in the Downtown Specific P3.an and consistency with the City's General *.Plan of Land Use .('see attached staff report). Issues dealt with' specifically addressed height, bulk, density and parking.. At that time, the .. .,. Planriing,,Commission made .findings. that tile, project would comply with the Downtown Specific Plan and General Plan of Land-.Use in order to approve the project. Staff believes that the analyses contained in the 'original staff report is, valid . todaX, "and that the. proper , r: findings can be .made. •`In addition the applicant his agreed''to comply with Section 65590 ' of the government code, which requirees new ` �1 housing .devlopments constructed within the coastal .zone to provide housing unitss 'for persons of low and moderate income. RCA _ 7/5/85 -2- (2926d) ;t` .i " `�f��r.'!':•1 i+i•L'' x•'•Yes/w•..i�+.......,..�...L<..u'Gti .:.'..GRZ.'l aAIR[s;c.«w.sL.. .K.,ra.a.:.�ir..,xr.a.+.•.wa.titRu'i'...«w'.:i.:.1:.7]:��1N.'L:lr✓::.tN�+s a.,r5"x'ewEw •.f. .i1} /' S../ Staff, is concerned that denial of this CDP based on its. par.king, height, bulk,, or density. would not be supportable,,, considering the fact that the .Downtown Specific Plan . standards specifically allow developments of this nature. . There is also an approved Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map for this project which already appoves the proposed projects parking, height, bulk and density. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The. proposed project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act which states "where a public,. agency has prepared an- EIR on a specific plan after January 1, 1980 no EIR .or negative declaration need be prepared -for a.'residential project undertaken pursuant to and it conformity to that specific plan if the project meets the requirements of this section. ' FUNDING SOURCE: Not applicable. ALTERNATIVE A CTION: As an alternative action the Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Coastal Development Permit No. 85--4 teased on the following findings: � FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT N0. 85-4: i 1. The proposed project is consistent with the .City ,Coastil Zone suffix as well as� other provisions of the Hunt.tngton Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property; .,and conforms with the plans, . policiee, requirement.s .and standards of the City's Coastal Land Use Plan. 2. The proposed project. can be provided with intrastructure. in a manner that is consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan. t 3. The .propoued project conforms with the public access and public recreational policies of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act. The Staff will be transmitting under seperate cover, the information which .the City Council requested at their last meeting with respect to apartment and condominium project profiles. .' ATTACHMENTS:, 1. Letter of appeal from Mola Development Corp. , dated Jane 26, 1985. 2. Staff report dated June 18, 1985 with attachments 3. June 4, 1985 Staff, Report 4. August 21, 1984 Staff Report JWP:HZ:kla RCA == 7/5/85 --3- (2826d) N 41 [ .,:'.:tyc.+rw-...-- ....•.�..Y w.uneaa•.ra.:.Nw.r ._ ....._.....-..-.w..+ ,....... .. ....».•.w.,.....aa.*nw.,....w.........-+.r....o�. .+w..•n....a.*rhhaaR►..ww+�.— 1 Mola Development Gorporatlon RECEIVED CtTY CLERK CITY OF 14UNTINGTON EEtC11,CALIF. 8p72 Adams Avenue,Hunt,ncji�n E3cxh,CA 92&,G in 26 52 NINE (714)969.13.13 June 26, 1985 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Subject: Appeal to Planning Commission Denial of Coastal " Development Permit 85a-4 Dear Mayor Bailey and Members of the City Cocncils ti We.hereby appeal the Planning Commission's decision to deny Coastal Development Permit No. 85-4. # The Plgnning 'Commiasion's' decision was based on a' finding that she development will adversely impact adjacent streets by additional on-street parking. This conclusion is not supportable as this is the first ,project `Y in the. Downtown Specific Plan area to meet the new parking •' standard. Also,,- the only evidence presented to the Planning Commission. tc :support this finding wag the inadequate parking x for the existing project. It was- the inadequacy of parking for existing developments that led. the. City' to. adopt:,new parking requirements and to. modisy be design- of or.-street parking spaces to acco_ mmodate .two. times 'tl e• existing on-aetrest:. pa;king. These -factors -were taken into consideration by the Planning Commission when they approved our.,Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract ..Map for' this development :in September 1984. and when the standards for the Downtown Specific Plan were adopted. i We will be in attendance at the Public Hearing on 'this appeal and will be available to answer your questions. Please feel free. to contact our office if you need any additional Information. R p ctwfully submitted, M LA DEVE PMENT CORPORATION 4 + Frank J. Mola, President FJM:Iw y wR,q.,.,. tj%.:7?�v�^+4•.a.�.+�w..w•1wW.:+'.l•�.i�«l'Y.a a.wa.,.a ..w�yYtaaw.+leNr..r..• vra u.Y 4 '•}. - .ti...4,tx Ir:.<::1t1`C`..`.,;,• ...:�,;'JIX�:%:l'Jtwraum.a��+• ,,. huntington beach development' services department STAff ,�...._.......�t E P ORT..- _..,...,_._...........__ j 4 - TO: Planning- Commission FROM: Development Services DATE: June 18•1• 1985 SUBJECT: COASTAL..DEVCLOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-4 On June 41 1985, .the: Planning commission continued coastal Development Permit.No•. 85-4, a request to construct a 10E-unit•-; condominium projecti,;bn 3.07 acres of property on the inland side of Pacific Coast Highw4y',.between 12th and 13th Streets until the June 18, 1985 Planning dommission Meeting. :- The. Planning -Commission directed Staff to transmit the approved plans (Conditional. USe Permit No. 84=19 and '.tentative Tract 12238) I' to the City Council' in order to confirm that ,the project is consistent with council 's intent on the Downtown Specific Plan. A letter from Chairman 'rAiredgs+od has .been transmitted to Council and a memo from James Patin to Charles Thompson has also been prelared (both of which are a:cached to this report ) . ..The Staff 'Will -prepare a rummary of the City. Council 's discussion 'd• t e 1 5 meeting.and 'distribute it for he Jun 8 l98 � ' In addition, Staff met with the Attorney's o1fice .to discuss the action; which arc appropriate 'for the-Planning Commission to take on this project. . .The conclusion was that a final decision, has been made on the ,enti.t,lement •request (Conditional Use Permit No. 84-19 ) ; and that Cammission' shoula only be making findings in relationship t to the Coastal. Development Permit (CDP No. 85-4 ) . Staff has expanded the find;ngs 'for approval from the previous staff report (June 4, 1985) . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends tHat ,the Planning Commission approve Coastal ' Development' Permit••-:io, 85-4 based on the following findings: 'FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85-4: 1: The proposec;` L05--u»it residential project is consistent with . the City Coastal .Zone suffix as. well as other provisions of the .Hunt ingtoh .Bea'Ch Ordinance Code applicable to the property, and conforms. with the 'plans, policies, requirements and standards •of the City's Coastal Land Use Plan. now A•FU-2]A Hip ^f i r• • 2. The proposed project can be provided with .infrastructure in a manner thatz- Is consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan. 3. The proposed!residential project conforms with 'the public access and 'public recreational policies of Chapter 3 of the CaliforniusCdastal Act, as they apply to the project location. •TViese 'provisions were addressed by the California Coantal C•omipfbsion in their .certification of the Downtown specific Plar. 'ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff report- dated June 4, 1985 2. Letter from -Tom Livengood '•to the City Council dated June 61 1985 3. Memo. from JAmes Palin to Charles Thompson dated ;June 14, 1985 4. Conditions ot•.'Approval Conditional Use Permit No. 84-19 dated September 5. -Letter from ,.Mdla Development 6. t9i6utes of •5ept'bmber. 5, 1984 Planning Commission Meeting 7. Draft Devi.gh-"Guidelines for Public Improvement in the Downtown Specific Plan . 8. Council Actloh' Report JWP:31:kla .� (2675d) , .At ` Staff Report - 6/1.8,/85 ' -2- (2675d) F�"^'•w'r"rw;,,""'�i!✓'l*:iw+�•^+------_......... r.,wYSK�.inw...-.�-.-.._..... _._.»...._. .....-... .._. ....... - _ :}. - _ � , I,t r 1 •Sys t i • huntingiton beach deveiopme' ,it services department • STAB : f TO: Planning Commission FROM: Develop:rent Services DATE: June 4, 1985, SUBJECT: COASTAL•,DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 85--4 •1.0 SUGGESTED ACTZdti: Approve Coantal Devi.-3.oument Permit No. 85-4 with the ••ffndings , outlined in Sectidti:'6.0 of this report. +' 2.0 GENERAL INFORI•SATION: On September 6, 190A, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 'No. .84-19 •and Tentative Tract No. 12238, a request to construct a 105--uni't condominium project on 3.07 acres of property on the inland side 'of Pacific Coast Highway between 12th. and 13th. Streets. . 1 e;.projd'ct is a one-lot subdivision consisting of 71 -one-bedroom units, •12 one-bedroom and den, 19 t4!a.,bedroo:n units to be cranstr'uctea over a two level Parking structute to a maximum . 'height of 'A5 feet. : A copy of the staff, report has 'been .attached for the• Planning Commission's information. ' 3. 0 "SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Subject Proaerty i GENERAL KAN DESIGNATION: High Density . ZONE: . Downtown Specific Plan District II LAND USE: Va,:•ant South of Subject Pr peerty ` GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Recreation ZONE: Downtown. Specific Plan District II LAND USE: Public Beach , ' Nor-th of Subject Prvperty GENERAL •PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Denaily ZONE: Townlot Specific Plan LAND USE: Single family residence I all- A-FM-13A w R-R tr'•*•••1 j:�'Zir'..r►r..•+^••+•.+•+.v.w..r-:Fa.Ti: • •.ta.M•...�.�....-. -. _.. ......+..•..�—......+••,s.-ww+.✓ + 4. r West of Subje .t Pro arty GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density ZONE: Downtown Specific Plan District II LAND USE: . % ' Vacant East of Subject Property GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density ZONE: Downtown Specific Plan District IT LAND USE: � .• Vacant 4 .0 ENVIRONMENTALSTATUS: The proposed project' is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15182 of ehe'. California Environmental ,oual.ity Act which states 'where a public agency has prepared an EIR an •a_ 'speciflc plan ,n,Fter Janvar1► 11 100 no EIR or negative declaration need be- prepared for a residential project undertaken purnuant •to"and in•, conformity, to that:'apecific plan if the project meets the ' equirements of -thi5•section. ". 5:0 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: The Huntington Beach Local Coastal Program has been certified by •the City an the Califorhia Coastal Commission. A Coastal Develppment Permit (CAP•) is required For any development within the coastal zone which is neither exempt nor categorically excluded. The subje' c t site. is located in .an area designated by the Coastal Commission as' an "Appealable Dev.plopmant", which is "defined'as "all area be4ween the sea and the. first public road paralleling the sea or within • three hundred feet ,of the- ;inland extent of any beach or mean high tide line of sea where there is no beach, whichever is the greater distance" . As part of the origf:iai entitlement, the staff analyzed the .project .as it relates to development standards contained in the Downtown . Specific clan and consistency with the City's General Plan of Land i Use (see attached staff. report) . At that time, the Planning Commi.saion `made findings that the project wouid .comply with the Downtown Specific Plan and General Plan of Land Use in order to appro,:e .the project. Staff believes that the analyses contained-in the original staff .report is valid today, .and that the. proper findings can .be made. , In addition. the, applicant has agreed to comply with 5ectian 765590 •of the government code which requires new k housingdevelopments- constructed w t n i within the c astal zone to provide . i housing units for !persons of low and moderate income. The City's action on'.a coastal. development application Por an appealable development shall be deemed final-'and in effect wb en ton working day appeal P6 riod to the Coastal Commission has expired. Staff Report - 614/65 -2- (2548d) y�R71:1}y!ryV:'>MMf Tr�ww=:.sf,L^,y.1\ 4AY.wwa•.I.wr+rYMw•Vlw+.vw.vrtw+.......... .�........w—... .. -« «. . .._�..��.__.� _. .. ,+''•�e�•::ra':ytY�y df' ':ISM •.. ��• Nil r % W INA 51 Z 11 I xm 6.0 RECOI*tEUDATION:. Staff recommends Nat the Planning Commission approve Coastal Development Permifillo. 85-4 based on the following findings: SUGGESTED 14I)INrs*.'EOR APPROVAL COASTAL DEVELOPMEUT PERMiT U0, &5-4 : 1. The proposed project is consistent with the City Coastal Zone suffix as well as other provisions of the Buntington Beach ordinance Code- applicable to the property; and conforms with ti the plans, .pcjl*iciesj requirements and standards-'of the Cityl.§ Coastal Land 'UGe Plan. 2. Tihe proposed-project can be provided with infrastructure 'in a manner that -is consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan.. 3. The proposed project conforms with the public access and public recreational policies of Chapter 3 of the California Ccasial Act. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Area *nap 2. Staff Report *dated AuOsL. 21, 1984 3. Site Plan, Floor Plant Elevations -JVIP:UZ la • .It • Staff Report 614.165, 3 (2548d) • t - r •c_.i•I.• ��.. .r«..r.�...,•....•.4:..v�w.1.•..�."..r,.1 t�. 1. � k .y , y � fin � �� ��.'� + - {� • � .��/�,\, �� ,��• ��, . ��fin, �� '�����►,,� /�,. • 1��,•� �`�:/ `'•�, `mot•, ` 's..;/t�•�1 � \•e,tiV'� �`�' n+x Ji 116. Nk 0-11 1.40 It ic �.�` S 1.+� ___..•III �� �•.E• /•,�- '�� � �i __ fl: yf�� '" r9 �. Al �:- CLa w SP cn rflrc IF1C 'SF'� �lrJ i ' 7'V; • � , •� ram• ���.11 � .��• Yl� s'::;'i ,� •;= �� { �°��t !�f t} � r.' � '� � S''� ?� ` .}y��+; .1_ �yS,'• '� �,,, ;,iS �[j�, 1.• ,�'f. '�P f 1 �, . �'1' �`" �: • tom _ li r�t.s �R..i `{ �, r y f�t • �• ' s` �F���F r C t+���5��. 1. �1� j�, �'3 '1�i � fii �.�4y�i �' � t �y,s � � �.I.'�.St ',; ♦ .4�tt 'ti, � � t � ,� } .� ` � ��.���5 �Y�� d� �• ,�•���, �' � }��,'' 'u ,fE nY��yft��1�;y ra �j �„ ;i,{�, t.� ��� r s ) �t; ,� t 0. S t�;�c +�,Z ��(�1�l�/>k/i �•�• f, V 1: r� r ,� � �r��� .W ���,�ip'.} �+, �1`' I� ;x• i.af ',y�fi � , w• ,�f, � 1,� �;,"< .''� ��. 1 �� i q a � ,� £+i� t�, y��}ty,. �fi t;, :�', �5�1 , ��x ` .p� �i ', ii�l t "�'�,�5�1.•C ! � ?: yyi��.�,`i nt ` i *�T'•'Z 1 . ! l�.� t r - •'� •� . �__ _ ' _� _ �% eta_.�t�»�' � ��T.lI r � I�lsylr � LY � ,�t t 4 •t Jai .� ,�( � , +t. ,],{�'`�. 4 .1 ,� + �� � t' * � n a f� ' f� � �i.�� �i"yF`; y 's'��ra+Y {�a r 1t iQ`�yk p�? '�'fit, , �`CC�� y �' �+ '' � f��• 1� ,r�l� C ''� r'i� G4�4r A. �� 4' '� , ,T� .�� �}Fi�'�'A'. i' •�,}, SV`•�� i't St }�'�, �•. t Y +?`�', ,t �!`� t � � a '�'y �.1��{ .; � a�' k k � It=• .�4. � y�`�al+y:s r. t.;��,.. ,f �..••�4t y. ;{•� W S'y% ,y+,'7 MTV ,� � fi,`r�, (' 'Kt t- +c4 Aw�.�. �y,i. ,.� � •�t � �j�,Ji ql� � ��.��. �",�•,. .� � .f �x �; .���: •�. .y � L . � �,i�l .ia" "�� .� t� ,S" -�D' F 1�i r lty. NZ�t•"''.t• �r .t� qq--'t�•.t i�'�,` '� 4 luntington beach devefopP .t se ' c TA f rvlces department -�R EP' OR 1• Pldn,iing q mniission FROM: Uc�portment . Dev DATE: a lupment• Services August COIdDI'1'IOire1L UI'il; !'CItt1I'I' I1p, 84- isJt1'I_'11'!'IVC'�'1'IOA(;•r tJO, t t70'72 itiJ iOs Avt.,• OT. 11t CL�'t�I'I:U:• �2236 I 1, c; 11untincItoh Be.-tctt, CA92G48 Atrgttst: 1 cr, 19.D4 '�4UEST: Toparr;•ti C o 1.tJ, unit ISTtttU11'!'OItY reridcn C i PPOOVSS jtq� Dom_ c f-r nrlclranri n}.urn ----- c1evOl.0111netjr: and a c!r}e .:ut: • '. sulid V* 's16n. • October 9, 19FA' �,�.._,,,�,• !lnrth side of P,-Wi fic Coast; l,OtJl•:: Jl i crhwa? 'he�trt:cn 121:!} h, •-- 1 !th St rCf�t; • t)Otvtit:nWR Specific plot, D•i i t:r i.c t. 1.1,) 2 1.07 lir ctic •itC�ir`i i t.�� Jtr�. r .lent• i.t r t 1. 0 �UGGI :;�1r U ACTI(II T1ppro t:or•di tional L'ue Permit No. 84-19 a abject to t•'inding� ih conditions containeddin Tentative Track No. .12'l3ti . tf GENZ;'1?►1, •INk'Clit7lt, �Ct10i1 8.6. C'ondi tional Use Permit No. 1.�238 is a4 •19 in conJunctiot� with Tentative '1'rac ; do request to •create a oiTe lot subdivision .and construct: a IO unit condominium develop}nent on 3.07 gross .acres o 1'3cificject t:pa.;t ?li,hway', •12th Street, 13th Street ai}d W<�IEjeCtY bounded by ; subject site ;s locate- within the dorms:own 5 RUC 11VeT1uP• 'I`Ii�+ Specific i E i c Plan; Dig 3.0 EMlI IJt:hi 6t�ALL g` r�r`S: t ri ct PJo. 2 The proposed with 'Sectiun 1a182�ot1 '1raxSl:at tram envit'anmc.ntal r . ' Lis-w in accardanice I e C. Guldel,inesw y j, . a S • Y I •� ? �*'_ '+� +�i �,� 1 �!' �;' Y�i,�� ••SY e �' � �v +� F � I t�tvY„�} ,D l j r S ??� • 1 � ,, �� � r i � fir' '� �i � Z . `��. 4# � +tY;i 'i�Y� ?^�%b�} � �r, 4 S +�{� •i�. t lT ` f���YU ��i � y ry�•��. � gill v `. �hs+1�� v •��.i F �l r� �P� rr�•'C�t '��� •�' •�'� �YCi � �,<� 'S� � ;' t�'�•�rj� �� tt �4',1•H` Y 1 (h +�.+ � i 4.0 SURWUNDING L/ USG , ZUNI14'i. A14D GENEMIL r Atl VE;SIGNATMIS: - Subject Property: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNAtMCN: Itigh Den pity ZONE: Downtown snecific Plan District No. , LAND USE: .' Vacant . South of Subject Pro 12at:ty:_ ' GENERAL PLAN `DESIGNATIGN : Recreation , 'ZONE: Downtown SCiecific Plan + District No.. 11 LAND USE: public. Clench West of-_Subject Pr y GENBPAL PLAN DESIGNATI'4CJ :. : 11igh Densi'•ty ZOtJ);: Downtown Seci f i.c Plan District ttd.' 2" LAND USE: Vacant. East of Subject: PropdicX: . t GENEMA1. ELAN DE SIG CJ/0"iCtl : • ffiyh Density 7011E: Downtown :ioecific 1114n Dist: t,if:t 14-j. 2 i,AtJO USt• : Co irune r i ca I/V ac a n t Nortf, .of Sut,ject Property: GENERAL PLAN '.1iESIGNATIL" : Medium uensity LONE: Town Lot Specik.ic Plan LAND U,%: Single Family Residences 5.0 SI'ATI STICAL ANALY SES/DISr RICT 1 DE'VELOPME'N' T STANMRDS: 5.1 AREA OF PROJECV: 3.07 gross acres, 1.88 'net acres 5.2 NUMBE:` OF UNITS•: 105 ,�• , , 5.3 TYPE OF.- UNITS: • ;' 86 One-bedroom; 19 two-•bedroom ' 5. 4 DENSITY:• i Maximum 35 units per gross acre. f x �°{ � Q� � a � §• ,r}r►; ,C�� t ear� �� 4 ; .��. �• f ��i ''� �, .Y�•�` t��Yt},� �`t}� � T J�� C }t� j�'���_ ��' t''�� I� � ; � � j r��' j �• i �rt.ti. � :f ,t �' ;�... tgT'i Y �it' 1 ♦a � 3 rr � '� Y .� i �I� �. ''�j.- ,: fy, � {i Y �1\aC�� fy '� �'�•�; r: �� `¢� JI ' .� � t 4,y k �d ! a .tk.t 7d } i 2 q a � rl. •r� a �`.(a{ '�� � � � .`{t w '« .,r F •� � '�{�'i �ty�i +. k� .� .TG bEli�'�$ + �t �' .,. � , 'i}' w, 1 S 4�� >t ,� �''d� �,' '� ' k t; 3 �J.e 1�, �� �n�at .•r� t,� L• 9 l"aS�, b 1 i � � Z 1j l.r` � r 5.5 BUrILDING 11CI/r: � maximum 45 feet: (b'uildings fronting Walnut Avenue maximum 35 feet within 75 feet of 'the property line) . Maximum 501 J 5.7 SE 13ACKS: "•. , i Front yard. minimum, z0 feet; side yards minimum 15 feet; rear yard �rinimur► 3 feet. r , 5.8 OPEN SPACE: Cotr•:aon open space shall be equal to 25% of the floor area of each unit; private open space* minimum area for one-bedroom utritz 200 square feet; , . minimum area . for two-bedroom units 250 square feet. 5.9 PARKING: = . ' , r minimum for one-bedroom units: 2 spaces per unit. Minimum ,for two-bed zoom• units s - 2 1/2 spaces per unit. 6 .0 SUBUIVISFM COMMITITr:: The .rt utAi vision Cnmtnittep. reviewrA this pro jur,t F,st Augu:;c. i'tl, 198.1 . tlr attr_-ndan#:c: at the meeti.nq vezre ronresentative:: bf Lite Vcjirrttncsrrt of ({ Public horkr, Fire: it, Dwiarttnent of Vew,,npitierit Services,- .►nd r Commi,slotiels Sahonpacher �tnd iligifi.ns. Several art.-as of .:anccln t�'crc � . idenL i t l-;#r and dih,-.usaed hq Ote :.arxii visi on Cutnuu: :tr_e. '!here apeci f i s '•. isv-sos i tiLti t it-led try the wrntie rs of the comini t tetd are contained in t tFc� attached deaft minutes. 7.0 1SSLES AND ANALYSIS: The proposed 'devolopment includes 105 one and two bedroom conanminium units in one structure built over two levels of seibterrane4n parking. The entranco into ther 'aubterranean parking structure will be off 12th f Street, acid the exit off '13th Street:. The root Line of the propoposed development varies in height from '3 to 9 stories. Comwn oven .space 4 within the development is provided in two main areas; a central.rourt yard area, and a recreation area facing Pacific Coast ;Highway which will contain a swimming.ppol and !;pa. Three floor p1,1115 are proposed within the development raric ing from 748 to 936 square feet in size. Each unit will. be provided with a private deck. The major issues of!: concern are whether the proposed dewelopment complies with the intent: antl'.specific development standards applicsd to this of t:e within the i u4ntown. Specific Plan. Section 3. 2. 4 of the Downtown Specific plan state• ghat. District '2 " is; int.erded to develop as a continuation af, the" type and variety of residtntial development which .4 exists in the, adjacent town Lot area. ..with. the exception, that Ia*rger pro jets lone full 'block 'or more) should be provided with. addi tional • �5 Y . `f. 1 • 1. . .y1.4Y!'*z',•"•'r: ,;��;�l�aa w....r..�.. ..._....__. _........-�.w•...w, wv..a.w.-...-,.__ ..... ...+..........,M.. ._.......... .. �...�.-...._.. ._•__-_..�_..... .._._ ... •'F •;` +PY� � � •� � � j' S�( '�Y T8 '�« 7 1 11tiFIf"'.GGii t T �'� � { { 1 �# n' I`��.� et+ � ,1� ' +�,a . L '1{ss�+�;i }�y+�• �. 'l �:.T ��� `4+�Y, � ,. }, i �• � ;� I } a. T ,��, i� ,� •,e 7'Y t rE �� ;, ,t. !41 `S -�� e.;1,+"� ;� q x � �. � 7 :r)S � ,• ,• iW NP A + incentives to encoif• e lot consolidation.. . inr-`•tier- to accoirplish this the allo::ed djensi ty .n the distr in should as the parcel size increase `. Consolidation is desirable in this list• riot as a means to achieve the •design, controls and variety of the residential types which will produce q.talix•y `residential. development which is sensitive to the adjacent neighbors ; roncerns. multi -block consolidations may also be allowed to promote'-better design, however, view corri:brq should •be maintained along tbty existing right-of-ways so as to n-ot, :adversely affect the resided fial ar vas 'further inland. Projects of one 'tr a l,l block or greater should be allowed additional height. in Which to achieve the allowed density with•a design which takes advantayc of. the pro'ects location, while reroairiing compatible with adjacent uses through upper story set blacks and ,other• design regulations." , The staf f has reviewed the propcsed project as it relates. to development standards contained .,in Sections 4.2 General Provisions and 4. 4 District 2 Deyela ment Standards' of the Downtown Specific'Plan. The proposed density'.for the project is 32.4 units per dross acre, The . specific Plan permi,ts'a abximum of 35 units per gross`•;acre. on a full block -within Distr iG '.t 2 of the Downtown Specific Flan pep. H&ximum building ha:ight Ear Cull -block parcels is AS feat, 'however, the specific plan requitres that within 75 feet. of the property line of Walnut ;N r Avenue the hdight 01411 noL exceed 35 feet. In reviewing the building' elevations, the staff liar, found that the propo3e6 hu ildincis along -Walhut r. Avenue wi *itist the pper Ot.;ry ,et react: -'prea are shown appioximitely 17 i feet in he bg tit, and :the 4-• std ry hr, ildinga nri t 11e r•ernainrlC-r of the site are 41%owi. ap11r1)x1$n.-tely 47 foot in 'neight, howevpi , Section '4. 2.04 (al of the SpeclI i•: plan pe'tmit:; an adds ► iunal tere feat, in height for roof line treatment l i non-habi tali] r a.-eas ,x 1,11e maxim..o site coveraje toquired tar projvcts within District. 2 or the. Specific i"' an is 5t,t. The amount 'of coverage proposed for the project is approximately 40%. For all structures 42 inches in height or greater the net back requirements for the subject site are 'as follows: front yard 20 feet - exterior- side, yards •15 feet; rear yard 3 feet. Set backs for the propo:ed project are, generally in compliance with the minimum ` requirements, however, there are some low--profile walla built over they parking structure which surround terraces, decks, and drive rasps•which' encroach into the setback areas. The applicant his addressed these encroachments* in a request for special.. permit (attached) . The required amount Hof ,common open space for multi--family residential developments in D isi;r l' t 2 of the Downtown Specific Elan is 25% of Ole floor area ..of each ii111t. . The total amount of common open space required for the pcopbsed development is 20 ,640 square feet: The amount provided is in excess of 40,000' square feet. . The Specific Man requ,ire;. two parking spaces per unit for one bedroom units and 2 1/2 parking s�inces per unit for two bedroom units. The total amount of .par.king reyia fired for the proposed development is 220 pair ki ng spaces. The ,ainount provided is 222 parking spaces. , • � Y n • T7EVYrw.^.+r..�►T•- • ii+cr...n....-......-......«.......,.a...«b.,..w.,rrw.n:•.�•..... «...... _ ..... ..+.,«..... ..«..«..,,._.�...-..�. •..—.. ...,.... S i `�. _ , '�" 11•+C b� .�Si• t f'R �'!tt t } ;`���!'� ,�j'f •r+ � R�• - , : Y. .!� (t+ S. �. i � r, tip. Ir. � .� !•.� r .n. , >,k' .�r. �`; �X uc •-a The staff has reviy"'°�d this proj,rct in terniy c ,r ri compliance with the design concept for Ae downtown area describer. n Pages 23 through :15 of the Downtown 'Specific Plait. The design concept calls. for building architecture of a modern or a contemporary Mediterranean style with specific elements such -as .plain wall surfaces built of stucco, colors from white to pastel shades, brightly colored awnirr3 sp ect. In the star f' s view, the '-proposed project fully meets the intent of the- design concept and. set: ap- excellent• precedent architecturally for future development'.rwithin.•the downtown area. , Section 65590 (d) •of-.the Government Code requires that new housing developments constiiacted within the coastal zo'ne shall, wherry feasible, ? provide housing Units for persons of low or moderate income. W1»•re it is nbt feasible to provide tt;ese' .snits in a proposed new :housing development the City shall require the developer to provide such housing , if feasible to do so, at anothex location within the same city or •county, either within the coastal zone or within three miles thereof. 8.0 REC OMME;N DAT I GO The staff r-ecommendA' that the planning commission appkbi q Conditional Use , Permit No. 04-19 and .1entati ve Tract No. 12238 with the! rollowing findings and condido'ni s : . '• )'INDI NGS I:OW SPECIAL•PERMIT: 1. the project-.. contains fea:ures which provide qood land plan ninq techniques :rr.ith maximum i ne of aesthetically pleasinq hypes; of landscahin•1 , site layout,, and tiesign. The proposed lnLnor ern:roarhrrr•nt5 of 1 ow--prdf- i le bu ildinq walls i.err roundirrq terra net;, de•-Ios and access c an+l+F. will not detract t ruin the t._iuposed davelaintient or ,ureoutidinq env1roninertt. 2. l•tr• ru 'e. :` will not be ae t:rimental to tl t: 4 P ] - r general health, welfare, safety and convenience of the neighborhood or of the city in gene ral, nor detrimental or injurious to. ttre value of property or improvements in the neighborhood or city in general. 3. The project is consistentr.wi•th objectives; of the downtown' s :. specific plans standards in 'achieving a development- adapted to the• terrain •arid eompatible with the surrounding environment. r FINDI14GS CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT No. 84-•19/T1:N' ATIVL•' TRACT NO. 12238: j1. The proposed, develcpment 'complies with the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan. 2. The General-.Plan has set forth provisions for ;.his type of land • Or4r a, Weil as objectives for implementation of .this tyre of !lousing. , 3. The properry'was, previously studied for thiE, intensity of use •at the ••time the Downtown Specific Plan zoning designation was •t placed on the subject property. i p•(�"f••-•�'••��v}ry/wr.+ ....._ ....»rrwwv.WAM • .++Hwr..� .•_. r �_....-� �+w...w••�� .,.,.w�.„irw•.• �.v.-.. ram+ • • .;'is j1 � ���....[[[[ � � VI ati M '! ` 'h' .•f �R t� ., � 1� S; k.`t' 1 t •, t , 1 . j+►UE/U: :;,ji�di vi ioil (it l:l't is .3.07 ' :re parcel of: land zoned Vowntcr.tn?") :ific Ilan Itt.strict 2 i:� .,Dosed to be constructed having 3. units per gross acre. S. Lot: widths depth, fronta(le street width and tlirough the use of the'speeial permit all ether design acid inl3lementation features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliarice 'with the standard plans and specif ications on file with the;Gity as well as in compliance with thc- ,r;tare• j stabaivisk6n" map ')ack and supplementory City subdivision = • o rdinanc� } SUGGEMD CCt4DITIQOS 'OF APPROVAL CUIDITICUAL U&3 PE1u•1IT 11O. 04-1.9; 1. The. site 'plan, floor plans, and elevations dated Aug:ist 16, 1904 shall be tihe approved .layout. ' ` 7.. • Natural gas ''and 220V electrical shall be stubbjed in at .the location ofclothes dryers. 3. Natural g4^.;.'sha1T be stubbed in at the locatiph. of- cooking f ad ili ti at�-' ~later heaters and central heating ;units.' ' 4. [.crw volurrP_, heads shall be used on all showers. 5. All•.bu ildiiig spoils such as unusuable lumber, wire, pipe ,and other surplus or unusuable materials shall. be disposed of at an off-site acea equipped to handle them. { 1 6. F:tie.i+ly-ef t.icxent 1 igtitl iriq shall be used ;ii open Space , rer s. l 7. All dw#!i I its;s on, t he subject property ,11411 he const ructed. lit rc,mt,iiant�e: with state ac+►u:�tical stariiiarJ�� :yet forth for units that .ate `,Within tire 60 C111:1, contour of the prone rty. Ei. A detailed' soils analysis shall he prepared by a_ registered soils engkheer. This analysis shall include .an-site sanpling and, laboratory Itesting of materials to provide detail recammer.dation5 regarding grading, chemical and, fuel ,properties ' ,oundations, retaining .walls,, streets and utilities, etc., . z ' 9. A detailed .landscape and sprinkler plan shall be •subject `to the l approval of the Department of Development Services 'prior to the PP P P P . issuance of hr,ilding petmiLs. 10 . The location- and design of all entry gates shell be reviewed and., approved bj the Department of Development Services, Pub!4 t9orks • •• Departmentj''and Fire Department prior to the issuance of , bu iIdiny permit§. .11. The Fire sii•ri,nkler systems shall be designed and installed -in • , ' those str ubtu res as deemed necessary by the Huntington Beach Fire• Department -prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. All •approved• drives shall be considered required fire lanes and shall• be skj tied as such as deemed necessary by .th'e Huntington Beach Fire Department. .; rt �YS{•1l - I" f� t k r �,�.• t.` A e.• ' 1 4 k i 'i' '' � �� t. � - t �^,�7 {'� '"TT��','�'., l A 1 3 � � ) �'� k .r 1•�y, tl�'�r �� ���Y. y y�r j I �, .� a 1�.. .�. ��� .�•k. .�•i� n �Y. l E ! 7• � � Y}7 r,1r' 1, 13. Building c? -,atinnr, sha' 1 be modifier;/"'+ r•omply with the maximum �alloyiable .A111t, limitations within D.,_.;. rict 2 of the Downtown Specific Plan. ; 14. A edondary 'access to basement G shall be provided in accordance with Department of Public Works' standards. 15. • The •me thod =of `trash pick-up shall be subject to •the approval of t he'Depa r tiden t of Public Uork s. 16. The applicant shall provide housing units for persons of Icrw or ma.6arate income subject to the provisions o[ Government Section 65.550 (d) The applicants compliance with Section 65590.• (d) of the Government Cade in terms, bf atrount and locatiart of. affordabld•'hpusing provided shall be subject to the review and approval of the Department of Development Services. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TE•NTATIVC TRACT 00. 12236: 1. The . Tentata-v:a Tract Map received and dated Angus t 16, 1984 shall be.t-he apgl�dved layout. '. • ,• • . r 2. The water Isystem. shall be -in accordance with the Department of Public Wnjfk s standards. 3. on and ofte site sewer drainage and street improvements shall be in _accordanca with the Department of public Works' standard A. sire hydrauxs lie located in accordance will, Fire Dnpa rtmen•. • s stand's rds. ' JWP:3B:aj tt (1059d) ATrAC3 U UTI5: ' . Area t•l.qp Z. ' Site P,an,, Floor flans,• I;leva tions 1. Tentative Tract 146 ' 12133 4, 'I,^tter from applicant dated September 16, 1964 r - 1 }j •} 9' �t•'� �' ,y � • M' ,'{�. tM r Y � � l' •` "1.� � ,. 'Ifs�� e�� f i ��•�l ' 1 y t ,•. t., 4•` ` �� 1��'�' ; Y. It_;�5 hf � y) ���y ' l. r I It �•� '•� 4 i r+.1, > � y �� '�9�. ;'r, �•J, f ,� 'i�"�.0� .,7 Sr ��j�, �q' ,,/fir Y "'�4 �� A .�'f� 1s �. `fix R At H 18-0 U:i F •- Y -J L_.-J L_.ill ri Lr C,Osry :1441 k All it tL •�"!,^.G,iy�f �` �/.�C'• ' `�_...�1J„1)�,�\'��j���ti,\ � a';�r• �•,•+lr�c��j _ ZZ 96 NI 0 01, IP •'r�,\''��Y ICI '�` �f • � .. v': � � � ' � , �� 6+fZ,•r` �. '� Y:;f� � ' y. �'�. �. �' 3 to. �,� �i � �� k' . � ,Y T � ��. a q 3t r; OKI .I J •. I atingtan Beach Planning, Commission P.O.,•HOX 190 CALIFORNI;± 925 41) June 6, 1985 Dear Honorable Elayor- and City Council Fie are transmittip our concerns with regard to the "P.ier House". project located onethe inland side of Pacific Coast 111ghway between 12th and` 13th Strebts which was approved through' Condit€onal Use Permit Na. 84-•19 and..Tentative Tract No. 12238. i .. As part of the enkitlement process the applicant must obtain approval of the Coastal Development Permit which is currently pending before the, Planning Commission. As a reault of this application (Coastal Development Permit No. 85-4) the following issues were raised; 1. Is this the type of architectural design (specifically in terms f ! of bulk ) that: the Planning Commission and City Council intended f-or the Downtown. Is 32..4 units per acre an acceptible density' for a one 'block, consolidation? (The Downtown Specifric Plan permits a maximum of 35 units per. gross acre on a full block within District 2 of the Downtown Specific Plan Area. ) 3. As a . result of the additional research generated by the proposed code• amendment- for the Oldtown/Townlot and Downtown Specific Plans; an issue regarding the adequacy of our parking ratio was raised. 4. The Development is presented as condominium type ownership; but can meet the standards for an Apartment project; does this affect the City Council 's view of the proposal2 it should be noted'"that the project meets the development standards set forth in the Downtown Specific Plan, The only Special permit ,y granted was for railings, patios and balconies to` encroach into the setback area. The Planning Commission appreciates any clarification or direction ;. which the City Council can provide in the above stated areas. Sinc rely, ' Tarn Li engood d. chairman, Planning; Commission T1 •it .+R'ly'ty�w'.. �:.17:%:1 r.».+.-�...-..�.....+-•. ....... •++e_r,:,..n• .«..._.... _ ..._ .. ........- .... .-.._-.......�_...-^...•w wM.,f.::•...Ot ^t..w:Aun.e+,.rw.+..........�+•..-�-...-..-., ,, S �1 ¢ r r r�, A.• •� ' � �. � •� i .! S'._ 4 f �5�� � � i �Tc?� y1J• �'•{a.'�i r �il�y 1 CIT v of �i1J4G1if"JI'f��34�"�'OM 0t+..r.�i�i INTER-DEPARTMENT COMMU TION HIMYiN`41CY1([4CN To Charles W. ThJompson f° James 1•7. Pat'in, Pirector• F city,*Administrator Development i'ervices 4. 4 Subject PLA14NING COMNISS2011 REQUE T Date June 12 , 1985 . FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF { CDP FOR HOLA •PAOJEC`1' AT ' ' I2TH -AND PCH A Coastal Development •Perinit (CDP) is required For developments •in the Coastal zone that are not exempt or categorically excluded. During normal processing, ,;the CDP would be considered and acted upon at the same time -as any other entitlement for the project. tit '.this' particular case, tfid"CDP would have been processed at khe•.t1me that •. the Conditional Use-,'Permit (CUP) and Tentative Tract Map were approved. The CDP is designe4 .to give special attention to those issues deemed of imporhancd by the California Coastal Act and the City's 'Certified Land Use Plan. Thesd •include coastal access, visual resources,' community facilities, hazards, energy, density, height, parking, signs and issues relating .to water, wetlands and environmentally sensitive habitatr.. All of these issues were addressed and provided for in the Downtown Specific Plan. lit the time that .CUP 84-r19 and Tentative 'tract No. 12238 were approved, the City hiad not yet received certification of th.0 zoning portiun of the 1XP, aisd was not insui"q CDPs. IF the applicant had wanted Lc procecd 'with the development, is CDP from the Coastal Commission would have been required. In view or the CY ty's approval•%of the CUP, and based on the approved Land Use Plan and the? Downtown specific Plan, staff believes that Lhe Coastal i Commission would have, approved a CDP. However, the applicant waited until the City regained their permitting auttiority, • and is now requesting City approval of the CDP. The city's zoning 'Implenmentation was certified by the Coastal ' Commission ds adequate to implement the Land Use Plan policies. This means} that, in gene4al, if the development complies with the zoning, if will meet the test of the findings for a CDP. The issue of whether I the zoning• ordinance itself is appropriate for the City is not in:: question in a •CDP application. The subject development, which was approved by the Planning Commission In August of• 1984, :lies within an appealable area of the coastal zone. However, only CDP approvals may be appealed_ beyond the City Council to the Coagtdl Commission. Denial of the CDP will mean that the applicant' cannot'.develop the project, even hough the City has already agreed that.;,Ehe project meets the zoning requirement!.-, by approving a &P. Staff is concerned .t)iat denial of this CDP based on its heii7ht, bulk, or density would notr•be supportable, considering the fact that the- Downtown Specific Pl•ar. _Landards specifically allow developments of is i 3 yx � rq( � "jll �� � �;� ` ♦ �, Q 1, !, t r- j1 ii 3 +� 71! i �.K a 7 L, k]•1 AM+ � `y 1 a .t �0 � ~ i (�f C �3 ! � �t'�, � i ry�?''7,��i,�/tr V ♦ 1 �\\\\`� • � ° .,iT'.11'�'�! ( !4 ,♦ "t N '�f'f4 1�, ♦ �� �b't k...�; C � � "+�� �� .rS ti t� + r�� '��T'K j�t; `�M'•�'•�,• •,''M.�W�ii 4� ti :1''f � a� '7� �r �•f �3 sS "'VVV... ) ti: 3' � +' �i :L. >�.+ � a "r �y K l' ti this nature. -It Gtie Planning Commission is dissatisfied with the approved zoning, they- may recommend a resolution to the City Council to chango the allaw,ed standards in the Downtown S ecific Plan. Until such revisions are made, the staff must continue c r-�cojrimend approval of the CDP•,t ased onJ Compliance of the project with the rc-:tifi�d: LCP. JIM:JA11:kla ; ' (2682d) ! �C t - r t + {.fir` • •. • + ' 1 a � , 3 � 'I '1 v • ♦ mot. lr `a�� y44p' � `.•'°:+STi�,;aarw.....�..-.........� .._+•++K.+�i.^.sK+4v...•...+►.... .rw.w..,+w♦....,.ww,.r•ar+wwr.....••..•.-•�-- r• yr, • • ,1. •t• r+ �' � � • •� f� " t •t` y it ;x., 1 A � s �[• ."�' , l� ' � �+ ; r� 1 � i i •' 4 s� • �. 1'� Y-{ .fo� �ji�1 t��1 fir" �•'�'. `� t� ..1 ` � r. '� ���� 4' ,.♦ 4S�*, i(i� r ��"k�'+'.. t�f � � � t�! �l'�•• �t x t y •t �1'. tAy r •� fry :yunting on Seach Panning Commission .�. P.O. Dox 190 CALIFORNIA 92648 Septembe:: 6, 1984 ' i• , r I Mola 0071 Ada.:s Avenge Huntington Beach, t:A" 92648 Re iust: To permitfa 105 unit residential condominium 'development and a ' one lot nubdivisioh::' • ? ' Subject: CONDITICli7AL USE PERMIT 84-19/TENTATIVE TRACT-No,• 12238 DATE OF l%Pl:ROVAT,: • September 5, 1984 FIG"'NUS VO1% SPL:CI;%1. .PERMIT: 1. •t'I.�• j �oJer•I- ':ontains feattis es which provide aouu J aiod planr ng L?(ihniques with waximum use cry ay.,thLttit .Aly p]:•. : :rty types 'of architecture, landschpiny, -At.. Layout, ,7nu den,qn. TO. proposed minc,t encroac:hmei,ts of Low-1.:of i!.r liLi loiny walls surroundlnc7 -.erraces, decks ally.! at.r'• sr' ramps will' ,ivt de+.ract xrotn the t;caposed develoliit"ent or surLIA.Ilditlq environment:. 2. The project will not be de•tritrzntal to thu general health , wt tfare, saibty and convenience of tale neighburhuod or of . thy: c5ty in general, nor detrimental or injti,rious 40 t.lse Vail.Ue• of pclpt'rty or improvements in the neighborhood or city in general. .3. The project Is consistent with objectives of the d,,wntovrn!, specific plans standards in achieving a development. adapted to the terr;sin •and compatible with the sorrounding I FIt.. I Vas l;ONOITIONAL USE LPL UMIT W. 84l-19.''.►ENTATIVE NO. 12238 -. 1. The 1•cupor,vb:.deVeial.uuent: ccamplies With the Gestural. Platt acid ' Vownk.7wr, Spe' i•fic Plan. 2. 7'11r rt.neral •plan has set f'r th provisions for thin. typ,- of. latA upe, ar••'weti as ohjWIves li;r implementation of this . typ•? *f hous tng . ;en`;t.ryn-h•t`=* t"i4'},' Y:f,-.w--•-""---�...,.,.....e..s:._..ct:_r..a....«...... _ ...... _.,. ..•..,.....,,. .:. e:,.. ... - .... •._ . ' 1 . l 3. The property was previously studied for this intensity of use at the time the Downtown Specific Plan zoning designation was placed on tHe, subject property. 4. Thy: proposed,`fubdivision of this 3.07 acre par e•.!1 of land zoned:-;Downto�yji„"Spec.ific Plan District 2 is ptoposce.* to be constructed having 34.2 units per gross acre.S. Lot width, depth, frontage street width and through the use of the speelal' permit all other design and implementation features of the proposed subdivision are proposed to' be ' constructed in' compliaace with the standard plans and specifications *v file with the City as well as :ih compliance with the state subdivision :nap back and supp ementory City subdiv:sion ci:dinance. , CONDIT10I4S OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL, USE PERMIT 140. 84-19:; 1. The site plarir ,floor plans, and elevations dated, August .15, ' 1984 shall be'-the approved layout. 2. Natural gas shall be stubbed in at the location of cooking facilities, w4ter heaters, and central heating units. This recuirement iwiV be waived provided that the applicant will . install a more energy efficient alternative subject to the review and approval of the Department of Development Services. 3 . Nal.ural gas small be stubbed in at the to cation of cooking fae.ilities, ,jter treaters and central heating units. This requirement may be waived provided thatIthe applicant will install a more energy efficient alternative subject to the review arid approval of the Department of Development Services. 4. Low volume heads shall be Used on all showers. i 'j 5. All building spoils such as urusuable lumber, wire, pipe and other surplus- or unusuable materials shall be disposed of at an off-site area equipped to handle there. fi. Energy-etficlerit lrghtling shall be used in open space areas. , 7. All dwellings. on the subject property shall be constructed in compliance with state acoustical standards set forth for units that ace,within the 60 CNEL contour of the' property. 8. A detailed sb�.16 analysis shall be prepared by a registered suils' engineQE. This analysis shall include on-site sampling and laboratory, testing of materials to provide detail recommendation: regarding grading, chemical and fun_1 properties foundations, retaining walls, streets and utilities, eta. ' y { 1 I BEST PHOTOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO �. AGE AND CONDITION OF ORIGINAL DOCLTNMNTS ' .ti+�`r';`t1Gr'N��i.G�t.• r.,z.' .�idl�kL'"F�!W¢�a6'i�_r'�iT.�"�7� +','..'`�r. - '-',jS�:.;u�,�»i.:y�.&�i�9+*�;:��i�S?:' �d v;nl. .��� �r,'.. J/ r r1!', r�. r..w�r_yr�..•w._ �.�."++Vsi7;wr„ � +.-...n.r.-..T•. .sv......rr.�s,l1[.�.- •,J,•...-'e,� � ' •... ti r. .. .. . r.-. .+.r«n-.•.wr.-..,..s ..-r..,...•.'.......rr+[Ikf!T ti•}¢^,�a .R_ T"',�•'s"."'`".� "+ '�e'r'.1.�.•;i:S.�'.:" ,'j�i`e 'T::,:>u.:): ,G� r•.��.,w•\.fat- .,r� :t..+e'•.t':!<<�" yh•'1'le"''.�yy 1� ,�"�;�'^",•;t r. � I s a detailed landscape and sprinkler plan including all public, anci. private walkways consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan shall be subject to the approval of the Department of Development services prior to the issuance of 'huilding perini•ti. . : 10. The -7,a,cation and design •cf all entry gates shall be reviewed ' and approved by the Department of Development Services), Publi.•c*Works Department, and Fire Department prior to the dal ' issuance+ of build:.ng permits. ' 11. The lEie sprinkler systems shall be installed throughout the development in accordance with National Fire Protection Standa'-rd No. 13 and standards of the Huntington Beach Fire •• Department. 12. All approved drives shall be considered required fire lanes nj1+'.� and sha1:1 be signed as such as deemed necessaryiby ,tile . lluntington Reach Fire Department. 1a. The method of trash pick-up shall be subject to the approval : . of the.:mpartment of Public Works. 14 . The applicant shall provide housing units for persons of .low or moderate income subject to the provisions of dovbrnment , xa Section 65590 (d) . The applicants compliance with Section 65590 (di of the Government Code in terms of amount and r } location of affordable housing provided slial.l be subject to ' the review and approval of the Depaaitmunt of Development Services, Is. A wet srondp!pe system approved he the •lluntington Beach Eire Depar.traent snall be installed throughout the development in : + accordance' with standards ok the uniform building code. 16 The architecture of the project shall be in compliance with s , the .desir,n concept of the Downtown Specific Plan', ' CONDITIONS OP APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12238: ;'.� . 1. The Tesitative. Traet 'Map received and dated August 16/ 1984 shall be the - eppr4ved layout. , ` 2. The water system shall be in accordance with the Department . of Public ,Woia ks' standards. 3. (in and off--bite sewer drainage and street improvements shall be in accordance with the Department, of Public Works' . standards. ' 4 . Fire h'ydrants*sha11 be located in accordance with Fire Department's standards. _� .• too.....-- • -- --•�----- _. _ ... ....--....... ---1 i hereby certify rhat• Tentative Tract No. 12230 and Cohditional us-e Permit No.84-19 wag approved by the planning Commission•of the City of Huntington Beach-„ California on September 5, '19041 upon the focegoi.ng conditions and citation:,. Very truly yours, ' James W. Palin Secretary JWP:MA: jr (1121d) ; • r . _,`te7r.(�r•.••.t�!'~-.+v 1.i;.rv:i:[T .%1•,-,7lSG-M iij iJ:'l.�a'f:..w:sswro+r..v+."w.,,..�...•...rwe.r.•.+.•+".�r..w,w.+.........r—s.�«....._. �...._..^,.a: Mole L eve1o��t��ei'�:.orlauratic i i. 80792A(3!ii,,,A%vrnu•,1Iiti IltxI .r:xJt. (714)M91;14.3 June 10, 1985 • ' HUNTINGTON 13EACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Huntington Beach Planning Commission 3 j�Q5 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA' 92648 P.O. 13ax 190 Huntingion 130ach, CA 92648 EtEs Coastal Ceyelopk.ent Permit #85•-4 Dear Chairman Livengood & Members of •the Planning Commission: This letter i.s :in response to the Planning Commission's action to continue Coastal .Developmene Permit '85-4 relating to our proposal to develop-the Pacific Coast Highway property between 12th and 13th Street on the inland side. We have patiently waited through moratoriums and the adoption of Local Coastal Plans .since we acquired our interest in the . propeirty in. 1978. Since .your decision last September we have spent approximately i500,000.00 in legal fees, final c architectural and engi'neeri►•►y plans. We presently anticipate filing for building permits this July. Your action is contidtie the matter is extremely disturbing since the plan is virtually the same plan approved by the Planning Commission in septembeir 1984. The Coastal Development Permit would have been processed concurrently .with Conditional Use Permit #84-19 and Tentative Tract #12236 if the City -had had permitting authority.;4 t' that. time. Since the Coastal Commission was in the process of 'g7rantiny the City permitting authority we waited to file our agplication at such time as the authority was granted. )1 11.13. Planning- Commission June 10, 1985 , Page Two r ' When the approvals 'Vere obtained for the Conditional Use% permit and Tentative Tract-Map the Planning Commission stated in their findings that the prppbsal complied with the General Plan and the bowntown• Specifit 'Plan. Additional findings were made with regard to consistency'-with other City requirements. Staff bus . ' determined that "the proposed project is consistent with the City Coastal Zone. suffix as wall as other provisions of the Huntington Beach Ordinance Code applicable to the property: and conforms with- the plebs, policies, requirements and standards of the City' s Coastal Land Use Plan". We understand the Planning Commission's function'at this juncture is to determine that the' Project is consiateni✓;with the Local Coastal Plan and implementing•Ordinaiices and is consistent with Coastal 'I'cilicies. It is not no►3 proper-to attempt to reevaluate the project and ' ask the City Council -"for clarification_ and direction . .. with '- regard to thin project". We feel what the Commission is � . attempting to do abould have been done, if at all, ten months. ago by way of appeal 'to the City Council if the decision of: the ' Planning Commission was to be overturned. . I With regard to the vpecific property there is absolutely no i distincticn as to whether or not an apartment coriplax or � condominium development is constructed. The City Council's ' action with regard .tp adoption of an "Inducement Resolution" authorized its to pursue tax- exempt band financing for an apartment complex to'Vermit us certain flexibility in arriving at the final economics for the project. We still have not made the final decit:icn as to what form of lifestyle will -first be provided in the project. In all likelihood, especially in todays economic climate, the project will be initially an apartment complex. Our ultimate goal however is to have the N. project nold. in the future as a condominium project If the economic climate is favorable upon maturity of the multifamily housing bonds.. t• We have worked closely with Staff to develop the, property to its ,.. present state. It is•'truly beyond our comprehension to- think that the Planning Commi'fision now is having second thoughts about .the project. Our analysis of the law is clear that the . , approvals have been 4kanted, findings of fact clearly made which support the pkoject',ar_S that the Planning Commission has : absolutely no authoxiEy to reverse itself: at this juncture whether sitting as the Planning Commission or as the Coastal. Permitting authority . . r Pv H;B. Planning' Commission June 10, 1985' �f Page Three + .� we will be presentt•hi' the June 18, 1985 meeting to resppiid 'to any Further questions• that 'you may have. , Very truly yours, M0LA DEVELOPMENT CORt ORATION , Peter E. von Elten,- f Executive Vice President/ , Genera]. Counsel ' PEvE:1►► cc: Tran% Mola ' Greg Hi].lgren j Richard Harlow- ' r 11j�ti'ca'ti�r Ti�.d .• + TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.84 -585 CONDITICNAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-20 AEnlicant: • fiancoci: Development ' Tentative ,Parcel .Map NO. 84-585 is a request to cretite 4-,industrial • parcel with reeipxocal ingress and egress on 8.0 acreq/of property r located on .tber hbi:t:heas t corner of Warner Avenue and/Gothar.d Street. Conditional Usb 'Permit: No. 84-20 is a request to construct a mixed ' use' industrial/commercial/office development at bas location. Mika Adams mare staff presentation. Public Hearing was opened. Eugene aancoc:k,' -tre applicant, addressed the 9ommission regarding the improvements,, recommended by the Planning/Commission that were .incorporated intp 'the• project. lie stated concern over the requirement to replace trees on a two to olse ratio acid recommended that a landscape' plan be approved by sta'�f instead of this condition. He .•ilsp expressed concern peer 'Condition 13 0tt Tentative Parcel Map No. 84;-585 regarding post i•ig a bond for future median improvements and -requested a dollar/figure. On Condition 15, he requested that, a••.tiaf£ic stuc9y alo g Warner Blvd. to determine if ' right turn rnly Nqs nFcessary. a public hearing was closed. Commissioner Higgins expresse concern over the commercial and mixed use application so that we ,d not draw out of primary conx'Wrcial areas to secondary areas a stated no objection to commercial uses that relates to . inilustrW.. fie also stated concern over• the pa;-king. Commissioner L ^vengood stated concern over the parking and also requested that the Planning Commission , delete some of the permitted uses from th application. A utraw vote wac taken and it was agreed that 10b% tof buildings 1 & 2 may be industrial related commercial uses ari�% of buildings 3 & 4 . Secretary Palin advised the .Planning ,Comms.Pion that a Conditional Exception must be is::ued in order .to deZGGINS note the buildings along Warner as commercial. • ON MOTION BY AND SECOND BY MIPJAHANGIR CONDITI N AL USE PERA;IT 11O.. 8 -20/TEINTA9'IVE PARCEL MAP NO. 84-585/NEGATIVE• DECLARATION C� 84-25 WAS CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF' 'SEPTEMBER 18, • 1984 WITH t)NCUPRENCE•OF APPLICANT, BY THE .FOLLOWING VOTLr AYES: Higgi.ns, Li.vengood, Winehell, Erskine DOES: Schumacher. ABSENT: Porter ABSTAIN None . CONDITIONAL US9 PEWliT NO. 84-•19/TENTATIVE TRACT .NO. 12238 • continued frosts Plann• ng Commission meeting of. August; 21, 1984 Applicant: Mola A request to construct:• a 105 unit condominium development in the downtown area .pn' 3.07 ..cross acres of property bounded by ,nacAfic Coast Highway, ' 12th Street, 13th Street and Walnut Avenue. ' Mike Adams made staff ;pfesentation and stated that the conditions of approval were modified,*added and deleted as requested at the Planning Commission meeting of August. 21, 1984 . Staff recommended approval of this project. (I24.2d) ,., -5_ z, _ ��ti•lam r ' t ' 1. t t Cowintssioner Schumacher inquired about the status of the• Design Guidelines of the Cowntown Specific Plan. She requested that condition 9 should,=i'nclude all public and private walkways. ON MOTION BY•L•IVENOO'O1) AND SECOND BY HIGGINS TENTATIVE PABC£L MAP 12238/CONDITIONAL U9E PERMIT 84-19 WAS APPROVED BY Tf1E k'&LOWIV6; VOTE: FINDIIGS FOR•SPECIAT •PERMIT: 1: The project co6 dens features which provide good larid planning tcchniques with =maximum use of aesthetically pleasing• types of architecture, landscaping, site layout, and design. The , • proposed minor encroachments of .Low-profile building walls ' surrounding terraces, decks and access ramps will not detract. from the proposed development or surroundipg environment. 2. The project wilX not be detrimental to the general } ea]rtb,'. - welfare, ,safety;�iknd convenience of the neighborhood 'or iif the ' ' city in general; •nor detrimental or injurious to the 'value of property or iarfirovements in the neighborhood -or city in general. 3. The project is •cdrisistent with objectiveir, of the downtown' s specific plans standards in achieving a development* adapted to the, terrain and compatible `with the surrounding environment. i FINDINGS CONDITIONAL USE. PERMIT NO. 84-19/TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 12238: 1. The proposed development complies with the General Plan and Downtown Specitic Plan. 2. The General plan• hies •set forth 'provisions for this type of land use, as well as objectives -for implementation of this type of housing. 3 . The property was previously studied for this intensity of ure at the time the Downtown Specific Plan zoning designation was ' placed on, the subject property. ' 4. The proposed sub'division of this 3.07 acre parcel of land zoned Downtown Specific'-Plan Dintrict 2 is proposed to be constructed having 34.2 units per gross acre. s' • 5. Lot width,• depth,- frontage street width 'and through the use of the special hermit. all other design and implementation features of the proposed•:stibdivision are proposed to be constructed in compliance witN..the standard plans and specifications on file with the City as. Vell as in compliance with the state subdivision map rack and supplemeutory City subdivisidn ordinancei CONDITIONS OF' APPROVAL'CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-19: 1'. The site plan, i).00r plans, and elevat:.ons dated August 16, 1084 shall be .the approved layout. f l�42d) 411. -7- P.0. 9-5-C-4 y„ '•'S.7;+T+In?'• *�` i; e'y`:...i.rr...ww..ti..............w......«se...,w .».»....... _. ... .. ...�.....�.r........-.r......... _.... -..rr ._ .. _...,._. ._ ,-.• .. •....�-�rw.... 2. Vztural gas sha11, be stubbed in at the location of conking facilities,' water .heaters, and central heating units. This requirement may.- be' waived provided .that the applicant will install a more energy efficient alternative subject to. the •.�,: review artd apprgyal of the Department of Development Services. 3., Netural gas shall be stubbed in at the location of cooking i facilities, watcx'heaters and central heating units. This requirement maybe waived provided that the 'applicant will install a'rsore endrgy efficient alternative subject ,to the review an approval of the Department of Development Services. t. 4. Low volume heads'' sshall be used on all showers. ' • 1. 5 . All building aloiis such as, unusuable lumber, wire, pipe and . other surplus ok.,unusuable materials shall be disposed of at an off-site area egtii.pped to handle them. G. ' Energy-e f f i c I on ghting shall be used in open space af:eas. 7. All dwellings -an *the :pubject property shall be constructed in compliance with state acoustical standards set forth for units that are wi thin' the 60 CNEL contour of tbn property. 8. A derailed soils analysis shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer. 'This analysis shall include on-site sampling and laboratory testing of materials- to provide detail recommendations regarding grading, chemical abd fuel properties E foundations, •retaining walls, streets and utilities, etc. ' ' 9. A detailed landscape and sprinkler plan including all public and private walkways"consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan shall be subject .to the approval of the Deportment of Development Services prior- to the issuance of building'permits. 10. 'Me location and. design of all entry gates shall be 'reviewed and approved by the Department of Devel.operent Services, Public Works Department, and Vi're Department prior to the issuance of building permits: Il.. The 'Fire sprinkler systems shall be installed throughout the development in accordance with National Fire Protection Standard No. 13 and standards of the Huntington Beach Fire Department. 12. All approved drives shall be considered' required fare lanes and shall be signed as such as deemed necessary b the fluntin tan 9 � y y 9 E.I Beach Fire Depar,tment•. ; 13. The method of tra4h pick-up shall be subject: to the approval of ' the Department of public Works. ' ' 1a la . The applicant shall provide housing units fcr persons of low or- moderate income -'subject to the provisions of 'Government. Section 65590 (d) . The arpplicants compliance with Section 65590 (d) of � (1242d) .' -•8- P.C. 9--5--84 .11 1. 1A , L • • t ' the Government :Code in terms of amount and location of affordable hous;ng provided shall be subject to the review and approval of tb6 fCepartment of ,Development Services. 15. A wet standpipV,gystem approved be the Huntington Beach Fire ' department shal:l'be installed throughout the development in accordance with standards of the uniform building code. 16 The architecture :of the project shall be in compliance with the design concept of. the Downtown Specific Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12238: 1. The Tentative Tract Map received and dated August 16, 1984 shall be the approved:,layout. 2. The water systes•shall be in acccrdance with the Cepartment 'of Public Works' 4tandards. i 3. on and off-site -sewer drainage and street improvements shall be in accordance with the Cepartment of Public Works' standards. 4. Fire hydrants shall to located in accordance with Fire Cepartment' s standards. AYES: Higgins, Livengood, Erskine Porter, Schumacner, hirjahangir { hGES: Winch-all ` ABSENT: None 'ABSTAIN: hone ,r Commissioner Erskine -excused CONGITIChAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-25 ; Applicant: Susie Kyung Su Hong A request to relocate 'the Spy, of Hawa' . to a location which meets the locatianal criteria contain dd i Article 975 and to obtain the required Conditional .Use Permit. Mike Adams made the, ataff Vpres tation which recommended approval with findings and conditioThe public hearing was Fesstaff Harold R. Stokes, an attorney representing Ms. Hong, present. He indicated that his client ' was in agreement with report and the conditions of t approval. David Rotai�fi,, a resident wtio lives approximately 35C feet t i from this proFased siness, wanted clarification as to the type of massage parlor. d ••inquired about the track record of Ms. Hong' s business at he r• urrent location as to arrests and violations. . He stated concern fiat' the shopping center attracts a lot of minors and questioned i this was an appropriate type of business for this center. L al. counsel,- Art Folger, informed him that•Massa.ge Parlors m t be licensed. He' stated that the Police ; -0 w'/!.� .s^^,+.. .w..7,:•4iGi.J.;,•u"1 se.r+.•w�•-w.awl.•-•sNf.a.Mlr'a.eµc A'•NN*�•.�w.,. .-_ .. -_-_.......-...+-.r.._.. ��•`1 PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS , LIGHTING ,. The existing lightTa4 system shall be replaced with a modern and efficient 110 volt system with underground wiring. This area shall be illuminated with the standard southern California Edison Company. £ixtUre. The lighting system shall be LS-1, owned and maintained by the. Southern California Edison Company. The lighting source.,-shall be high pressure sodium vapor;. PAVING MATERIALS :;':�•• Concrete within the•public right-of -e►ay shall not: be colored. Concrete surfaces may be enhanced by scoring or the use o� a broom or salt finish. ' Decorative block pavers shall only be used within the public right-of -• way, in those designated locations within the downtown core area. -LANDSCAPING The taashingi:onia Robusta shall be used as a major theme tree for the ' down.t n core area;= Was}iingtania Robusta shall be planted in a • formal pattern along Sixth Street. Orange Street and Lake Street within the downtoVm core• area. The Washingtonia Robusta planted I along Pacific Coast Highway shall be in informal groupings. Landscaping in the setback areas along the inland side of Pacific Coast Highway shall mirror the design of the Bluff Top Park. Appropiate material�� �hall include Paspolum vaginatum variety sad with groupings of 11gshingtonia Robusta palms. Turf areas shall include mounding. Private developments within the Specific Plan boundaries desiring to make a landscape statement with palm trees shall utilize the following varities: .y. Chamacrops h'umilis Mediterranean Fan Palm Trachycarpus':fvrt el Windmill Palm Brahea armat'a. Mexican Blue Palm Brahea edulis Guadalupe "Palm Butia capitat . Pindo Palm CITY OF HUNTINGTON MACH :-COUNCIL - ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNICATION CA 85-46 tnrrtwstav u� . :. - To Honorable Mayor and From Charles W. Thompson, }. City CouncM Members City Administrator Subject COASTAL DEVELOPMENT Date June 13, 1985 PERMIT NO:.85-4 The attachments (referencing Planning Commission Coastal Development Permit No, 85-4 "Pier House") are being•forwarded for your information and comments, should you care to make them. The Planning .Commission continued this matter with the request that staff secure input from;the City Council. The specific input which the:Planning Commis- sion is seeking is whether the City Council would confirm the September 1984 design/ 1 development criteria ap}iroval for the Downtown Specific Plan. You will see that this -matter was prepared as an "RCA"I However, it should be noted that the City Council Could be called back into this process if the matter Is brought up on appeal. For the Cite Council to review the matter as a format agenda Item at this time, and take a formal minute action, could raise a question of-prejudice if It f should subsequently be.appealed. Therefore, the pertinent materials are being forwarded i for information so that she City Council will have the necessary background to pursue j any course of action deemed advisable. Also attached Is a letter to the City Council from Peter VonElten, Executive Vice Pres- ident for hlola Development Corporation. Should any member of the City Council desire additional in formation vor.have questions, please advise. 'espectf submitted;' Charles W. hompson City Administrator , CWTspj Attachments • R .y. •��F1 7 L. w .1`iyq.-vj.r�x,.w.+.. ..,j;i.'.1;.,1.*.......»..M-.•...�..•,w.w+u;._aia.hr..s.:.....r....._.._._�._.._.....-.--.,..-.�,+«...««.-_.._....._.,.__.�.�..._-_`._--___••;__.• -............ ...�...- , t r< C + if/ 1 " tl' 40 RAP 1 t t / + s • a • i.. • 2 • r l 11 11r • I t • • •I t i • t t 3 I l • 1 • . f 1 • 1 A' • ♦ I • r • i . • 3 / f • r r •s • • r r _ s t r 111 t ♦ • r 1 1 / ; 3 • . ;4 A' �+fJ •+T ' -r v ,. lit M � � �r. � �. !4 Y I r .• ` ". 1 .� •.1 ..�' 'ri r a.�. , 1_ 1 j+ �_1 .:,��IFAA�t 1, y•�-�'` ,+li w_"��,Kl�i��S,�` •,,` rL , ti .F'� � rr `ram r}}'" x ;L''• '� • _ i n._ 1 `�'}T r;�,+�!"r^ y�_,a �.h1 [ •�}� ti•t • • ,+ •�•: �1 � f` 4 � - ► 7�•i�.,. • 'J'� • .1 ,� ti ♦r� r �,. �• � r �1 " { { � �: +�; ..Y �♦!y.� ,�.:+' w� Kbr��' �'r�,f�,%rr1;:'�y J��.y yn "' +�i M1� j �,�;,k�y _%-,. ��rc'�i'2 ,.Lr�I �' ►ti ,�1 \ + 'R�•►`, . '� � "'j}(x 1� ..1`� , c r_ '��• y' �',1 ��'. r\•:�. y� ai . '� M+ }}. �.,'..� `. S•r iwl �{- it y.2 rr * ` • '.�` Yx;~A�� t` r x , 1 •*r r r r, od tit 'y, �, ,}1 * +• �.. t Y y .a `�`= � -f .f'�ir � ` + ++'.x, r��j; +f � .�', t •4 �c�'.-'"1 wti'� ►. 1* J'�., '.,.1: 4.' t ... .�,• ,. � �. ' Il r<:f• r !.t .jy'h.�� r 'j+t•��.� '�' 'r �;�'M ~�'�r*r y�� �t. f,.A ��� ~ �+ti'��.* ��� � f .��•w L t Rya ti f' Vr F3 i 1+ d^ ..i. » '*S r r ,�9.! t. a�i 'tj' i• .�■ �' �.a Lr, F!L ti l a r _�. Y.�.n,•,'t at`. r rS.*a 11Y+h' 1 'Y _.{ �1,;r4n`' �` a '4,•`. •i� �'"� ! w�� .` �. .�' L.:;� M .},�' �� F L' l • ; x 1' ��l �j7y�Y'-"+1�'' � �., ,l� ` i`:1'1,. yam' +.• .+V t G. .�• �3c�..��w..a+'.'y*,•;,�i'.��__��-`3;F.i•�t,is+.i�' -�-- ` .+�.+.c-.•.r:u:1..-•+r;� ,:_ '�' `..al�.i1_� �� + � yr�. �..! �! ,.Y 1". • .' *1•.�. ^�', ` �. .a.i��;,'r�� '� ..�-`4y�'l�M':•.� ,ya,1 ` fir'=;.`'t����{, } Z:}��t'>� "p"4 } �-� '•.�,'e+ n �1. ►:. . »,. �41 �ry1 ti 4 �"+• M•, wr-.r �+ .Y NY.Y,��+'•J�':�6� �, i�,..�,a.. r���.y1,.'it 'y'�17i.� ♦ �,r'. '�3 "'�rr��it�'h"� ' Y�'+ti Sb' .•� 1•�.'R, �� X " '+' »'. `+�'. b► y 1 e,�r��.5�_ ► 114 J` ';' F a r,a �«�.'' ti �, �"�, ii ► 0 4 � y 1 ��.. � �.w t i'!i + � • a tY ' `4 ,i� t .Lt/• r.� rj l'}1 ry■ • ! 'M f Y �. +_.'i n y�l±'1. a 4 fi:,, i +M�+ .'iC +'I .''�,ts. y.�S +M.'.7's■ I..�Y. � lk!�, �F :1 �t�'7��ar�c{ y' � zi • Y,�„ � ,trs, �', •,r}k nx _+ I ,1 _54+ i� ,rs �. : '�q 1� ���•R � ti!!S"" �tCM, r. }� �. M..r� +^",1 � r� �.. 1. �y '; NOTICE TO CLERK TO SCHEDULE PUBLICHEARING l )er .+Y 1 " OFFICE DATE.. ./ FROM PLEASE SC1 1ULE A PUBLICATTACKED LEGAL NOTICE FOR THS 1 . 1197 attachedAP's are 9 will follow No AP's Initiated by: Planning Co=ission Planning Department Petition Appeal I. Other Adoption of Environmental Status YES Ive Refer r to Department for 1 . information. If appea please transmit exact wording to be required in the le3al. l i f 1 •71y.:� rri • t •I`r l 1 s j, 4 ti CT:• t s �1 S] •'r'• . . 1 1 E li �, �'"It•ro .,��•��'�;+ �y�gry!jt+tl'�?��;"� ,ei "�+� �,1 d •. N��l "Y��"••,ylil'�f ? 1''�`� �y���,,��� '��� .� y"�,�5 �'�'�'{�U �!� �(�yq�,�'+�1 •`�`�k�+� •;:+. �,�yy�j � i.r� tFt r{T A, N? tx• +, R Gki ��,.. • *4 {�� (�.� `41• � �' :�'''� "e4 P�'t���''{ �• ��. +�.i� •,� �, � �ti � r ti��.p- 'Vri�6��1� Sr '�y �• �• ? 1������ �° �"� 4�4"'b�13� _��', �' �� � '��� � `�'� �i �1 !;� ��,, ,t r �"�, '} 'S�, '�`� s YI�t,.r ,'4� •�,�r»,:t�� � �I ��i'� ,�f,. �1 . �� � ,�• �, � �� �w� � �,'�`� 6_�t � . tl�� ��r ". f'. •i����f � '����tr"� py�ttyy� �� ]' ��" ��1 '�� t�li,� �,1 5}�•�' ; `; 1'� `4 �• i?v+ t,! t ,�, � lKil � .� � � ' yy ] � ��'r a a ! r 10'� . 1".�� �� �f �� }��' ,�'+h�,. •� 4 � "F' ��r.. 1 ��t r M j]tfJ1�r+E�J�T2:hti� �? � '('�rltlr.c`'�"f '•t{'1 jf�#,�']t,,�'.� �,t p � �, � .�y -``4�•� � �� 5'���v �Iy}' r„k +� , � �1.;+, 1 :��a 2 ll� . 1, a 1 'F•��" �� �r ,�,y.,t �4.r i�_ q�'� i ' ll�p) y� 4� `�• ,J ti, .�;�' .��� Il S''1 `'1' }, yyy7 ��,. 1� /� `� �; � '�a. .t �� ' �• aka `; 1 +�:'� f t t` a LM�111 + Yl•,Vt LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC BEARII�G� C� NOTICE IS REBY GSVYY.N that a public hearing will be held by the City of the City of Huntington Beach, 1� Cal fornia, for the ,purpose of considering Coastal- Develo meet Permit No. 85-4 is a one lot subdivision (Tentative Tract map No. for Eftle purpose of constructing a 105 unit planned residential development (Conditionai Use Permit No. 84-19) consisting. of 71 one-bedroom units, 19 two-bedroom units and 12 one-bedrooms with den. The project .will be constructed over a 2 Level parking structure to a .maximum height of 45,1 . The, subject site is located on the inland side of Pacific, Coas�.. Highway between 12th and 13th Streets in Specific P1an *District two area of the City. This applicationwill address the issues related t to the Local Coastal Plan for Huntington Bea h. } • �dW H'�'DWyI ' HUNTINGTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES JUN 33 1085 Huntington Beach, CA 92648 / ,r ! r -7 r ?, Said hearing will be held at the hour of -74 84). P.M. , on June 4, 83 in the Council Chambers Building of the Civic Center, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, f' All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express their opinions for or against the proposed Coastal Development Permit No. 85-4 OL Further inform.Ation maybe o,tained from the City planning Department. Telephone No. (714) 536-527% 14 DATED this -1-.+th day of CITY PLANNING COMMISSION HZ By ,,'.:... . a+ «.. r»,n.. .. •.....5... .':V' . 4i.y ... ,c.. . ..r. i.. . « .a ... .. a tA. .1.u]]„t .i r.:.'.w...•..... a .. 4. �s (Y a 1 tt1A T (� ti l 1 1 y4 . i • ���� i RFSMENT *tCR 49t1 RE011FNT **CR 481t 220 r` Art tlZ 9f{1 ST roll) 77n 1ZTll APT In HU4r[1JGTr7►{ AC11 CA 92648 11UHUNGTf1N ACI.1 CA 92648 f RES[nEtJT **CR 4911 RESMENT *kCR 4011 220 17.T14 ST 220 121`11 Sr APT 15 APT 14 t 11WITINGMN RC.11 CA 92648 11UNTINGMN nC11 CA 9264n RES[UENT **CR 4911 RESIDENT **CR 4011 j 220 1 ZT11 5T 220 12TIf Sr APT 10 APT 9 11UyTtNGTI1►1 AG1 CA 92b4�1 1111NTtNGTUN {3C11 CA 92013 Rr'SIOFNT **CR 4411 220 t 2T{I ST RCS[I1FNT **CR 4811 . 2�0 12TN ST APT. Ai ' APT 5 . NUNrI NG TON 11C11 CA 12649 1111NT INGTnN 8CN CA 92648 RFSIAFNT *41CR 4►111 , RFSMENT **CFT 4J1i1 1 220 12TN ST APT 2 Z?0 t2T11 ST 11UNr[NG tUN OC11 CA g7b4'g APT. i ! 1JUNTI1IGTON nCN CA 9264A t f 4 RFStunit **CR 4All r r RC,I f)t:fir +t*CR 4f111 12 TN St Zn0 12 TO ST APT F AP'! F. Hl1"1T t►1G'TpN DC{I CA 92W IIUNT[NGTUM nCN CA 4764$ ►,. RESInFNT **CR 4911 , Zoq 12tF1 'ST RI:SIOENT *OCR 4AII 20n 12 TN ST APt,�.:. Apt A - HWITINGTON RCN CA 72hh�t • f1UNr[NGTt1N t1C11 CA 064H '•:`-� R1:SInFNT **CR 4Rt1 RFSinr►Jr *'�, 70? 1 2 TN sr CR 41111 ' Art . 4 17 rll Sr APT 3 �. {IUrJTINGTON nCll CA 9?649 11UNTINGTIIN 8CN CA 9264�1J ;Y RFSI►1ENT **CR 4ni1 REStMIT ** 201 1ZTN ST CR 4611 111)'iTiNGTI N PCFf CA 92648 205 12TN St NUNTINGTnN RCN CA 92649 " RFS1nENT Or OCR 4911 211 1 ?T!1 ST RFSInFfit 9*CR 4811 APT '1 211 12TH Sr 1fUNrINGtnm nat CA 4764 ArT" A +t 111INt1NGTIIN RCFI CA 92648: r RFSInFNT *OCR 4A11 t 211 12TFf Sr RESMENT *1'C�t 4f31I Apr C,, 217 12T11 Sr NUNT1NGTt7►1 BCJ4 CA 9764R A n T RIIUNTINGTn" BCFI CA 9264F1 RESinFNt **CR 4911, RES1nFNT **CK 48ii 227 12TN ST 1204 rXIVE AYF `{IUNTItJGTON nC11 CA 92648 111M I/JGTON RC{1 CA 9264F{ K(:S1 nrfIT *SCR 491 t RFSInFNr **CR 49t t ao� t�T{1 ST Apr .n 307 17. T11 Sr {tor 1 NG TON fiC1t CA 92644 APT A 14UNTINGUM nCH C4 92648 RCS10FNr "CR 4Rt I ill i 2tf1 Sr RFSlflryr **CR 49t t Apr n 311 17,rif ST APT A 190NtT}7Gtn+J nCll CA 92G4q {1111JTTt1GTnN nCFf CA 92648 r / Iv •.n . ` + r r r t'7 • �� � � 't � P.�'�t6k• I a tt X,q i' � � i � µ l t i ` ''3.• '(�••*" ;# ? y�r�kx gTj7p;,:..•R k'i*�( 'y'ft i;J�C" :� ,L\ d,T�9I,} ,11:� ',t �;k'.»� � 1 :C-,` 'L.v � r, 1A.` l k t� L. t ?:k, ; '•#TT L '4,�i3' � r 3c`, �'S �:: + �!f �• 1. �. ��, .�� 1 7� � n}. � Le :k a, �"iy i,}, �- �„y 4: r �j;�';'`�r>�i� , l �,, '� 'l � �a" ,�:f S• at �. t 1 x• i'Y` °C +�Iv �, ► i• - •SFr > ��y�..;x "+' i v S: P; z >y>>i• ' an !i•+t;. '.,3:+ * t `y»'.�r R••., � i,1�r, 't�"� � '4 ..�> abs, t r:� .� r ,• .,1 �di� S EN,: 1,�; `` x,9 ,• ��t tip f'"� :dt ,i'�t. ':t t Y 1. ,Cr.. 3,+q. � �•L t .' y r Vie. 7 e L i. �.. �,iyy.ti '� ;:�. ,•� .� ,6� r��!i�t .1� •k ;(. '"4..;�-'Mt�trat�`�` ;3• '•1s'7r A `n..�.�••3t��•-+r �} trt• i, 5, az n:.; ��'+�, w �' >5 .�.. i }� ttll` "l+ �t •'1�' la•� d. •A, `�4a A.,� a ��l 4.N ��4, ��;` -+ t� ,�., .xy•"�R,'F•�fyr�� r •;�,1F ,�a )' % 't;�f' � ���T� .�� A#�"y °� y��t ,3' r. '•1i�;,•",•}}';;5: :'L, + k�.F,ti+r1,,"S+;�I..p •} i.t4,•h+"f"•'.� L 't. '•°.�a *`4`8• v! �ilM f •T Lz 'L; - ..t+i..a'.x > it,.Y�;jEj�t � i; .� � � T � o��'• "a���� 7a?«f •7.i* �.`t"" 1���"i ' ;y, � �Y �N �'�}.i+� v k• .S`~��:,: �s"z 't�`"�}'�.M� Y ,�' ��':' }`,� *j+{ xt.,{k '�� , + � q, t '� I}be 't-' ,'i� �'s } ��t�� .�'+r�.',• 7 �?�"V. ,r:gf �. _r` ,,� .�r! ;;} �,. I�+';*+• N f'i,#�+.. . � a Ss,:il �a.S�`�?,a�� f ) iA Y � i' �i<. t i k(•� F�J 3 ;` tip' + � h ����5 �i;i4';1 J ��, E,;,tic !�` y. � a ,� i �' ♦e ' b•,.� TF�.NS 1 �k�� � S ``�}� '�4:{���1'�"N. �:�Y ��'' �� Y � of L � y����IV�4� � �^r �'�,:.rww �.. .��•, �:�..�: t�, �, , , k.�, .ram. ti � 4*CR 4811 L.SItlt 4i St 'r`'n z.•.r RES I DENT, 2211 12TH AP O t1UNT1NGT1*C11 CA 92648 11Ut ! I I NGTON RCH CA 92640 44CR 4811 RESIDENT **CR 4011 RESIDENTc20 12TFI ST 2Tu 12T1i 5i APT lb APT 17 APT 1NGTf)N 1)C1i CA 92648 11UrJTINGTON 001 CA 92648 �k4CR 4611 RESIDENT **CR 4811 RESIDENT 220 12TIl ST 22U 12TH Sf APT it APT 12 11UNTMGMU BC11 CA 92646 t1UtI T I UG MN UCH CA 92646 *bCR 41i11 RESIDENT 44CR 4811 RESIDENT 220 121`11 ST 220 12TIi ST .A.1�T d APT 7 • II1Jt4TtNGTt1N dCH CA 92643 HUNTINGTON 801 CA 92648 **CR 4811 RESItENT **CR 4ti11 RESIDENT 220 12T11 ST 220 12TIl ST APT 3 ANT 4 . 11t1NTINGTtIN QC11 CA` 92648 t1UNT INGTAN UCH CA 92648T RESIDENT **CR §B11 ' ItESIOEVi **Cit 4E1111 . ` 212 12TI1 ST 210 12T11 S1. ` t1 NUNTINtTON 8CN CA 9264fi UtIfiNGTAN f1Ct1 GA 92648 RESIUEHT *4CR 4811 RESIDENT **CR 4811 200 12TN sr 2013 12TN ST AIsT D. APT C HUNTINGTON 8CH CA 92648 IIUNTINGTON HC1i CA 92648 RESIDENT **CR 4011 RESIDENT *OCR 4811 202 1?T11 ST 202 12TH ST AP 5 APT 6 I1UNT I NGTAN RCH CA 92648 HUiITINGTON QC11 CA 92648 RESIDENT **CR 4811 RESIDENT **CR 4811 202 12T11 ST 202 12TH ST At APT, 1 T 2 AUNT INGTAN 8CH CA 92640 HUNT INGI'234 UCH CA 92648 RESIDENT *4CR 4811 RESIDENT *4GR 4811 I 211 12T11 ST 211 12TIl STAPT C • • APT 0 HUNTINGTON 9CII CA 92648 IMITINGTON 11C11 CA 92648 RESIDENT 4*CR 4811 21SIBUIT **CR MI ST 21:i 12TI1 ST AUNT INGTON I1CH CA 92648 tiU�iTItIGTiIN QCtt CA 92648 • RESIDENT **CR 4011 RESIDENT **CR 4R11 217 12TH St 221 12TN ST . } APT A IIUNTING(ON 110 CA ' 92648 11U4TINGTON UCH CA 92648 i RES10ENT **CR 481! RESIDENT *4CR 4E111 1202 OLIVE AVE . 307 12111 ST r1UNT INGTON UCII CA 92648 APT C HUNTINGTON 861 CA 926411 RE5 t 11EtIT *4CR 4011 RE SI U(:NT *4CR 41111 309 IMI Sf 311. W11 5T HUtJf irlGTON 11C11 CA 926413 IiUMT IHGTOti UC11 CA 926t11 1, � S ��a I r�i � �� }+�, � �• � � ,` �` ' 'fir � `� tjgL t 1°;����7�� w +.,.;. '� •...}•,.era.--t�� 3� � �s��c }'�x" a'� ��� i��r .t �`t�q���jT��ct���'t�i��'�x�; '('t'�";i 4�}�\s �Q S } 1`.'�+�;i �� <�s�.•t��.g ti ,. „^��r�.x#' 'fit`I;. ��u':':�y�3•}. �} `s,t"j��'} �al'�7�! r �t.s i t}r� +� .ts•. ., ��h!'g�t� ":� Y`.q.1i`{�a �'�{'rt�,�*v.'LIt T t. . � '� .7}.#�, , [!4 .•r rkf...�i�.# Y sy,.� T4 ji `;,t .. y�,y,4�qh :.t Y+ :'t't,k�.�.: 'x'{' C 'i•{� f lt ��..y �, '!4 'Yl fit. t�x+•+t,l t'� '•" t'� .{ � i.; :,.,e.� 'y,'�"1�11v � 'l .S.��,i:iP,�`;�.f t:,t"�''4:�t�4 ��7 �,i,.` �rfa•�. � �t���c',�E !� s :'����` '�. 1s.�)p4 +,��Fl� }5:t�:.sr� � `r�"y'° S ,i r�t�i.,A.' ;�•43' a. � j nj' .i.>•Y'(�`9 i� ����� t��i�..'`�t � :�.. a�.,»+.,. ;:� �.r- � � 1 .ty�i' ;x �•�t.l� 4.0 to •t,.,`�. • �`� � '1 � '4�t�+�`'° ��tt� 1 ttS:"f $ f�r` } 1 � � t t'i "S�`C�' yy M !.v�,.� .{,... S,. �� `4. T'i �.�'::. ,a yS*c4 y '�. r ij 3 F a 'i3 3 7' S��r S7 �.� }��4 �� 4 X''X,•!'•- ,f t�,i i•x i 1` r � �r ,� Y� ��I'^'•�'.y Y f!�".4...t" �.y 7 �l �,���,:akXl';� 'h���" �c30.+)�.t� �:; ``M j` i ��x 4.'i .F+ � i � �. q r�' t �j �. ' �i �, r .�ti r 9 kF�' �(•�',� #�+ .CtI�;+9 �• � ,��. � F�^''t.��� f r�(<��'�;t`��r ¢Ya;�::�C�. t� �i� ` ;;(� `'�'.JS"'i'}ttr.�,�2�1,1� ('�,,i"i1w, t' r�;'�, r�mr s q s`#. ���Y�` • �I\�5S'�} ��� �i P ,r��`. �'1�S', 'µrY "�� +•r.1�[FF#:c 1 "�,#'}�CS.^i�5 Zx c'�; ti�v �.} �. .'y'� lit n.'� ., {, ..1 ;�Y � � �x#s d'1� .�3��1• k� x ��N6 -� `� ,t 4�s� �'.Ax��k�Y )j.�.{.A +,,�• ��c�iti s�..'�•1t Y }�.Y�i+t. i y�,:�"�,F;.\,'aX 1 N+TS �,��.,�' 't i t j ',lt� � .[.. t�.:�_.l �riY�`t'a3`a�.SRlS�t?!::r��4�ti�i ��tits�n�.� #`k"�-��.+*.��� tc�J ��,y.✓•.'r`'i�1:.i�;i+irti: }' +!«.� i 1 �a,R�4 t RESIDENT 4*CR Vltt **CR 4g11 214 11TH ST '� "" RESIDENT 1. 71b 11 TN ST •• ••• NUNT I NGTIM HCH CA 9264EI f.. 11191TINGTntJ HCH CA 92648 RESIDENT -. 44CR 4811 RESIDENT **CR 4811 2Q2 11TH ST 202 11 Tll ST APT. .14 APT IF) TINGTON 'HCH CA 92646 , NUNT INGTON HC1l CA 92ba8 IfutI f, RESIDENT ,. .,**CR 4811 RESIDENT **CR 011 202 11TH ST 202 11TH ST APT A APT 9. CA 92b4R HUNTINGTnN HCH CA 9264A HUNT INGTnN HCII . RESIDENT **CR 4911 FtFSt DENT **CR 4t111 2Q2 11 TH ST 202 11TH ST APT 4 APT 5 . CH CA 92648 flUNTINGTnN HCN CA 92b4R BUNT 1 NG TIIN H RESIDENT **CR 4J311 RESIDENT **CR 4811 i l E1. 11 TH .Sr ' timIT I NG TI1N HCII CA 92b4I1 202 11Tll ST -ART ,1_ HUt1T I NGTIIN HCII CA 9264N i RESIDENT **CR 4811 , j RESIDENT *CR 4H11 1101 WALNUT ST 1101 WAL1411T APT F API' .F. IIUNT{tlGTnN HCII CA g264E1 HUlITTNGTnN 0CfI CA 92643 RFSIgI;NT **CR 4811 RESIDENT *OCR 4Aii 1101 tIALNUT ST 11t11 WALNUT ST APT A APT It 11UNTI11GTf1N HCiI CA 92b4R HUtJT I tJGTQ4 I;CH CA 92b4K RES1DEiIT **Cft 48t1 REST DEN 1 **CR 4N11 207 11TH ST i 2n5 IITH ST HUNT IHGTnN 11CI1 CA 92b4R N f1N U'IT{NGT f1Cfl CA 97.643 RESIDENT **CR 4011 RFS1nEHT **CR 4811 215_1/2 11TH ST 213 Wil ST 9264B 111111MIGT(IN 6CH CA 92b4R litINT[NGM4 HCII A RFSpoll **CR 4H11 ftFS[DtiNT **CR 4gll 221 IIT1l ST 21y 1 it ST iltluTINGTIIN DCFi CA 92648 HUtJT I MG T['1N 11CH C A 926411 RFS[DC:NT **CR 4t111 RFSID NT **CR 4tllt 301 11T11 ST �m 11 TH ST AP T H APT C IHINTINGT1114 BC11 CA 92b4R HOT iNGTnN BC11 CA 92648 RESII)FHT **CR 4H11 RES10ENT **CR tail 313 11T11 ST 311 IITII ST APT 9 IIUtJTItMM" 11CH CA q?648 HOT INGTtIN t1CN CA 92640 FVA . +*CR 4011 - REST RESIT?ENT 210 It ST . •.•• '32b4R 220 11TH S1 AUNT tlIGT11N nC11 CA +{►1NT t t4GTilt, SlC{{ C A �Z64'l RESIDENT *+SCR 4oil RESIDENT OOCR 4011 210 11TH ST , '212 11111. ST ► oTV,.,G N itLli CA 92648 IIUNTINGTON UCH CA 72649 RE SI )r;NT +*CR 4811 .RESIOVIT *tCR 4011 ?02 11 TN ST ,202 11T11 ST APT . 10 APT :12 92640 HUNTINGTON RCH CA 92b4R 110T INGTON UCH GA ft SIOEfNT . **CR 4E11t KF.SIl1ENT **CR 4811 ?.OZ 11 TH ST Zp7 11T11 ST APT 6 APT 7 "Ell CA g2648 {{UNTtHGTON RC11 CA 9264R ►IUNWIGT[1N RFSiUEt1T **C:. 41<11, RESIOE4T *#CR 4E+1t 202 11TH ST 1 7.02 1 t TH ST APT 2 APT 3 48 11UNTINGTTIN qC{i CA gZ64n k 1 HUNTINGTON BCN CA 9ZG • RESIDENT *OCR 4011 REStOEyT **CR 48t1 1101 WALNUT ` 119 11TH ST APT APT t IIUNUNGTUN RCI{ CA 9264q ►1U4TI11GTt)N 11Cr! CA 97b4f3 RE51pEllT ... *+CR 4A11 RE5ti)ENT *tCR 4811 1t(It WALNUT ST l tOt HAL.NOT ST APT, C APT 1) 1lUt1TI11GTnN RC11 CA gx64N .4U4TtNGT0N t1CH CA 92646 ' aEstnft�T *OCR 4Ait RF51DE41 **CR 4811 203 11T11 5T 2nt- t 1 TH ST {IUr1T INGTnl+ RCIt CA 92b4t1 Hlf'ITtNGT(IN licit CA 9261" . • **CR 4811 RESIDENT **Ca 4011RESInENT 21t 11TH ST ' tn9 11TH ST HUNWIGTON nC11 CA g7.64E1 1lUt1T ItiGTUN UCH CA 9264n RESInENT **CR 4911 Ri:SInE4T **CR 4E111 717 1IT11 ST 215 11T11 ST HUNTINGTON 11C1t CA 92h44 1iUVINGTUN n0i CA 926411 REStUENT *tCR 4811 RE,II.►E41 4�►CR g811 301 11TI1 St 225 11TH ST IIUNTINGTUN ncil CA 9264n AUNT It1GTt)N 11Cti CA 92644 RESInENT **CIZ +Etll RES10E'4T 4*CR 4811 307 11TH ST 305 11T11 ST {1UNTtNGTUN RCiI CA 9264E< APT A 111f►1T iNGTitN RCII CA 926" r `Z sty}.{M.,1 •�f��, •i° ;t#{l�' � �' ��� A���,1�4��� � 1 *� +� } � 1 •.CUR r.. .5 �� 4 h1 r +„M1M1� yyyj��� � ,� 4/ r .'6s J r� � ' �,y'l, tit' �f� �� '�•a�I ��3 w�1� ` f �r �{� � ��,Ll t(yt, '(�}}`�p ,l�i:A r {.��� t y 'Y ,Li�� '�• y"�� k{l I �� ��� 1 � �r r {� 1 iJ9 �j, E '�.� �r• `Y � ,i.�l�.,�'1 v dl �.r� 'Ct ��"y J '� i, y� L '� , iP\ 1 /ty •4}�]�A+`-�T" t��� ' 4 .• I\' � 0 R �t • jl 't t \� T .•j f : � , ,� �, •ASS , 4 � �a x ��• ' ,+i1tu7y �• n'C • �� �", �`�.t � t �;y shy p5� St ��'���`�j�i ,�i ,,,r„ >.,,' ..,•�. e a S.i t �i`t� � Y r '.. t5 x ( �4.a„�� 'F' x�: 4^t 1�`,��,.{*,�•yrlii,, �"��.;rri�,. .o.w .�y � kWt. '+i r_r�,.. � d Er i ( •r-� t.k r. t�,�a..<� ti�� �.I� Aa..y SF ht� 7; ��!',•w 5. �•t.�°�j t' �S:I17� A ��Y l:'rot t1E..:� •+� 'K �` 1ai �^Fi; �r^'�'�d��w kt v�i`kit.,y�. r�. { �'k�. !'t,is�-�i.4�•�.� po s��' 'i �x.s> f 1 ,:. sir 1 � �,`s q•��1..i. 4-1 (r .., .r.,ay-• -� .r a 1 i\�:•s /A+' f�t.�: 3.�" �'t 1 .'�xro;.,p`.rfa.; ap j 1?" ,t �t. o�j r , t .1 }, �Y 1., • �"S, 4Jt. - +•'t SI :.G,�}" nfi e' v .: T` -r iy� .1'_ {A`, } N." . ; .y -,� ,fl,� .i.•r C �{ !tic, , �: v'ai: ''�" :�,v' .t.s'9.s.,•vs1`1 �n"'�i.. 'pa.t"t•+. c"� �'1l fS' { � ��� ,',� A1�,r• �.a d .: +� it,�-'t. rru\� \t a'•�5.1\ �;';t7!a."�' �"v. �l�•�it �.� ��a, ,r�,.,j : '`�tst` 4r, 1 .r'lu.+ 7 �' '�.• SIRS ,t. 1' 1��. '.� �,. t,.r,l:} * .5 .V ;a. 2 ,n ;'.�{;•�`�L'tb? t �_» •l,:c',.{'j ftF f ,{p r qt, jY .i't.,.� c. Z?�� �i!?l � '.t, �',Y:�- ^i,'1 0�.^1'` 9 �"+'^".'�#, `7. t}•:`�1.C�� •i1' ��y � ',"iAt;�1� 1 � � ;�'ap,estiy' �ti',t' � ' .:x.tp�.a.^.•�z ��yi i�XT'.-,,ny,f�f'�.�,� pal:kF ,r ;�t: 3�f.''-"a�; �"• r:a�;.� < '>1 r. �; `t l; s ,,.'}i'4•ar.`. . '�`f� �I.d�(t4+ 1'1 i �` t+,»1 a��pj� . {n,`{ n.. 1 �.� � .�.. 1,�w.� f.•{li(� "C ., �[£:, � {.. �Y c� `� ai� , s + ,,*:t, ii..i,s%.r.'Y,t-�'.i+ :x �..�t{t �`t�tk'"� .;a,••.. �1 i1 �t '�.l �riJ.i'4""' .s�,•1, '�t',k .tg .� ��R'l+{lf:� "Ys ryl. '11L l�. �=k{' .t.ir1� +> i t .t. �,r 4�,?}7'%r:yv?�7a. �•1 ty, t�,, t .1� � �, i , s a� { a i,� � ! -�.' +t`.;' �.,R. `� .1's 1 Y, t.;•++ ��s� ,,.:� .(t� w A.�s �,.r 4. S `� � tt � t ��t �i,tm �•4x, , . 4' 1 '�k � ��4.:}.3h.�� ;r«iht l�h 9. � 1 •�" Y s S 4Af, � � i �' '� `�•. �f�A'\§ Ytfai, iii 1-k°t,� R +t..t `.. r�-�„ai,,,,Y}s' a A �i t ; :,r.. t `c�i•.�'a±, 't 1 t'1 x r�7 4` "�^ y, M ``��,,���",�!"`' 4 �: ��• r i 'A lk p w!i+�4 4t;;..a'�l ,.T 'R„,x.. t�yry i'i 4 ,��.,�,Y�•� t4A t�� Y'i y}i ���.w}}}�a,,,��3,�^{i}+y{ `K} ��.r° r� 1'�`'��'tpf� �" :.}i.\�,F� �i a�lr '*'+`ia.,..�.r�»�S...se 9t�M'^''#�xC.�S._7.fM�..���.s;�t�\i•`a•J«,,i�?'S�Y46SIi����sr�S ar�ti.�s.k�§ii���t..-.. vi r.<T.�.�. 'et RCSIflEt�T:. **CR 4811 ? E'v T . **CR 4911 r RESIDENT *OCR `'9t1 31? 12TH ST RESIDENT *#CR 4811 ?1 i-1/2 12TH .ST HUNTIINGTOU BCH CA 92648 315 12't4 ST a HU!4T.1 t�GTQt'i 3CH CA 92649 =•r: ::� r�— 313 12T1�! ST HUNTInGTON' SCN ••A 9264— ," - -iU�1T i yGTD'� $CH C A 92643 **CR 4811 RESIDENT Tti ST -- 4*CR 4311 RESIDENT 321 12 Go RE SI DcST 12TH ST� ,, _ **CR _.li 321: _ R-SID=%T 321 127H ST APT L 321 12TH ST iTI APT D HU►;TI*+-STON BCH CA 92648 A T LPT E 92f�4s3 HVN GT0*4 BCH CA 92643 a 4l1':TIniGTON BCH CA r 4v'3TINGT7N BCH CA 92643 RESIDENT **CR 4911' �--� ,,, RESIDENT **tR 4311 RE�IR_NT. 325 1?_TH ST - #t�LR 4512 32112T►i 5T _ APT E r' RE 325 12TH ST u = �2548 APT 411NT14GTON 9CH CA 92648 321 12TH ST HUN I4GTDN 3CH CA NUNTIiiGf�7'3 BCH CA 92643 y TD H CA 92643 4U4TI` G N I'1E'�T ##CP. 4311 — * rR �►.,1IRESIDENTYt�*CR 48I1 325 12TH 5 * _ o T ESIUENT *# 48i1 R=_SiD:r.t 325. 12111 ST : as p CQ APT A 325 12TH 5T �, 325 12TH S` !, T �!T titT'J�1 HCH LA 92648 ,_.:... APT C q HU14TI NGTJN 3CH CA 92648 HU I A. T D ►1U!,T t'�GTDN C'� CA AU-ITINGT3N **CR 4811 BCH CA 42649 RESIDENT � � #SCR 4811 "¢-• '- - !tESiJ=_ftiT *'SCR 4Et1 RESIDENT ST 324 12TH ST <-�_�' � �, **CR 4811 1115 fl A V J..x-• s 2ESIJC'IY 1111 3^,ANGE ST rf . » -• i� ;, _ HUWTINGT04 CH CA 92643 APT. I �Ar1�_ ST q - '::;• ` ;.r 'y ^• � --may*-- .r 1135 'J HUgTINGT3N 9C`� CA 92649 HUt3TI1+�GT^Tt BCH CA 9234 4UNTINGTDN BCHCA 92648 RESIDENT **CR 4811 RESIDENT **CR 4911 RESTGENT_ **CR 4811 316 12T!e 5T .: r •- RESIDENT *OCR 481Z 329," 1?TH ST HU►4TIKGTDN BCH C�► 92648 322 I2TN ST f HUNTING TUN BC4 CA 9..b4�3 324 12TH ST r HUNTINGTON °LH CA 92649 " .ti- �lJyTiF7GTON BCH ..A 42649 a�'•-�.YT'_;„^•,='�.�,; � .,r- emu' ,,! '*• - _ 77 - � r f^is `fit rd.� t .tom•►„`_ _ `may.! - „w.w^-e^ ''. .. �Y,< ask^...,,. .� �,•i��.�!��''',.,.:;� Mom, -„n.•� • x�.. RESjt}ENI **CR 4811 RESIDENT *�4R �r$lI RESI7ErtT *#CK 4�tII RESIDENT **CR 481I -”" � .-_ w ► ,,. � �' ,�- = F- 312 IZTH ST 303 12T4 ST 306-1f2 12TH ST 306 121H ST *4UlTIN:•T3N BCH CA 9264E HUI:TI'�GTs3rf 5Ct! CA 92649 HU'�3INGTOu 8CH CA 9264s HUMTINGTON BCH CA 92649 I ON RESIOE%l **CR 4811 RESIDENT *�*�CR 4g11 RESIDENT **CR 4?1l RESIDENT **CR 4811 1112 OLIVE 1110 OLIVE 1133 OLIVE 1106 OLIVE 4UNTINGTON BCH CA 92643 HUNTINGTON SCH CA 92645 HU4TI4GTO4 9C4 CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BCH CA - 9264S RESIDENT **CR 4811 RCSIDENIT **Cg 4EII RESIDENT **CR 4311 RESIDENT **CR 4911 1I04 Z:.iV; 1111 OLIVE III1-1f2 '.;LIVE ST 1113 'OLIVE ._ , HU'JT145T3N BCH CA 92643 HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92649 HUNIINGTOH $C4 CA 92649 HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92648 • SIaENT **CR 4311 RESIDENT *• CR 4511 RESIDENT CR 4RI I RESIDENT **CR, 4811 224 13TH ST 224 13Tq ST 224 13TH ST 222 1NGT S BCH CA 9648 T •PT C APT APT 3 U 0 2 vr -1UNTI'+fGT314 BCHCA 92649 HUNTINGTON eC-! CA 92643 4UNT2'si,T34 5CM CA 926413 RESIDENT **CR 4BI1 RESTDE�.7 +�*CR 4:�I1 RESI3EN'T **CR 4811 RESIDSHT **CR 4811 13TH ST Z20 13TH ST 216 13TH ST 218 13TH ST 4UNTINS'TON BCH CA 92643 HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92b4° KNTINGTON BC" CA 9261%9 APT C Sri;-•.:.�: :' },-.�., -'+�"�''r� ""i "���+ `r'S • - :=j:'�„%�.�:=...-�-..,, e!� _ -�_�G - ►iUNTINGTJN 9CH CA 4264$ N ,:.'S •` .ti� �+-44•"r^1�=•Fpr_ t'i �`,f..�r _.,�.. r .... . 7 tjy, ,fi b ^,,,.._ •-�? ,.•� :.i..�, .. ., " f *CR q 31�• • 212 13;ti SZ LA QZbgg aNt � AB t*iG gGEI i�;H St L" G g26 �tG7G 3 13 a254 _ 4611 let G gGw Ch tWc �2645 0311 . b titTt�GS7i t?Gg 13tN ST 8CK Lb *LR i7E�'C S HAS R g�I �a•iT Z'1GtJN 5i cN'f` t cS 3T ; 4g # G q U P.� 3gZ 5 bG� G aC� ••A De""' S'� rA CL 4g11 pv i• GyGz�K gGtt `iGt 2.12 i,t L{ �Uht , i`•��iTi R 48-1 ;isiGS�� gG RfSi�` Ltztl'� t.�t_Ga g�649 ,K#La 4g11 � L •' 11tT["ZGT��i 8L� 13j� �� �,8 *+�GR 46 �yStGFtst St 926�'a. f:. . .. 'r 212 H �a q26 Q_,+T � _ g43 1 11oM 1 Nut�N Sty Ga su" .�T L .ZGt'3*S 9L RSS A µt.L.4ul G� GA g2 LII 4_ 1 - �L?L811 �U�itZ ; 13t�t Gt * GR 4Bl AK G 9 .64S GR O1l tpl j 7N gG"� G Z RCS1 2� G; 3p3 926� _ ` r . • - , ,- , �,, i2tiNvt�N =Si3_r.T ; 4a11 1 t 3 �!t gLN S!. r ti UN . S 9Z64� +a�t� i►Q Y�csGS v 4dr Ao= tI aGg L R�y 3�3��t.L 64 4S Z�1G?a �Mkt St +FLR 4g11 kflt �, ts3''� Gg RGSig` ►;JT T 43 a iG �t 1►�. ►iU,z[L ci 1 l�yp•4 Lt, r _,.h •_,. -tU'i R353 aL�iu= 9264E **Cp q T �uNti!3G7G� gG >J� `*� =t"� * +SCR 4511 a�T i T�'i gtH G� itESi��NS+�Jt b •_ r HUK;i+,G 13g3 W AL. ' g? ;a # 649 ; #CR 48 �ot t I NGt-3a 8 IS ayµ ass'°-9-3 tr N �z �ut3tia1Gt7 13Gg Fittµ ?Z6110 Elf Yri n ♦ lr 4 � GAP „�*GR 4811 �Pt NGTµ BC" .faf3.~.rY' �f. .arm ... `��•,tr•y{" 3; Y!H 's . 7����'.4 v•� ,.. -x ;OF �..fa J..f. � ... ' Cf. /'_.3f2'si'. : �.,Y' f _ rt.��..� t!'r•!. _ r�,. - • ... 1 ` RES I 11CNT • + +fCR 4g11 1'3t)6 WALNUT REStnl;liT APT T A 92640 . 1301 11ALnUT IIUNTINGT�N 1yC11 C APT 1 11 CA 92643 Nt1NT tl1r,T�1N 8C *J%CR At311 RE S t nipit *+SCR 011 1306 WALt1UT P,ESInEttt APT 3 9Zh4A 130h WALNUT IIIINTtNGT11N r'" CA APT `4 rA 9Z64q ,.,. IWITItIGTWI HCII **CR 4R11 RFS11'Ftt[ , *+SCR 4R 11 2n5 t yT11 ST [St qFN T APT C 926g0 R 2t)5 I;IT11 ST ►IU+ITINGTIM c1C11 CA APT 11. 92648 NUNTINGinn r1C11 CA **CR g011 RFS1i1"T t,!.CR 4811 2n9 1ITII ST RE5it1FNT APT, C A r 9208 i• 709 13`114 ST IItINTitIGTnN 11CN ., APT n 9264FI ' i IIUM1ltIGTpN aCtt CA *SCR 4R11 r. . RES1nFNT **CR 4R t t 211F 13TIl ST 9264[1 RI StS1PNT- HUNTjVGt(1N 11G11 CA r 213 1-1111 5T 9264n IIUpIT I NGTt1N IIC`l CA **CR 4811 REStnrtIT 13 Tit. ST ts+ CR 4R11 225'1/2 926411 Ri=SInENT IIUNT111GTnN FiCll CA 22-1 1 ;T11 ST A 926gq 11tt�ITItIGTt1tI RCII C ;u **CR a8tt RES,InF_t!T *4Crt 4F111 1315 11LIVE AV RF51null AVE APT g264% 13nT OLIYF ;N CA 9264f1 1111NTItIGI 11CH CA IIU`IT ItiGTntt 11.. aCS111FtIT 4,OCR 4t111 *+SCR 4R11 n1_1VC AVF 1315 aF)Inr.4T ::VF APT Z r1 92649 t;1tr, IIL1V1" 1111FtT1ttGT N nCll CA APT 3 INGT 9Zh4R Ilts-1IItI DO CA **rp 41at1 RFStnt:Nt nUVE AVE GR 4R t t 131? q�Z648 RESInFNT +t4 IIUtIT1NGTf1N ac11 CA 130 OLIVE AVE 97.649 NUNt t NGTntt f101 C•A pFC1nrNT .�*cR 4R1I ►)*CR 4R11 30i�1/? 13TH ST 92649 RESInEtltl St IIl1tITt�IGtntt nCII CA 303 13T 1264!1 NUNTINGTnn nc11 CA RE51Ktit **CR **CR 4R11 :321 13TN ST 92640 RErTnf tIT it 111ItITI'IGTnN 11C11 CA ' f 1'ItI IGTtI�I rtifyl CA 9Zfi4�1 RESIDE"T *4CR 4811 . **CR halt 3Z6 13T11 ST 1;1:511lErIT APT 6 . 92648 327 13 11 STRC►t CA 9254R 11UNT11IGTnt4 RCII CA . IIU'ITiN ,t I ii k '�fc ,� ♦ �[tY w OMMMs��14F ?l ;1 '[''r.,,,y-r;�`� 1A'?Y"!""� ,'^"'T'�'�'�'"^^'�•'""';'r". '�'"!'. ,.y.._•,t.+ 4'p',•(}y'•;T,�'q^1. '`„!�'�%?,,j' '°�''�r"..c .r�"""�"tT;"'"'"3y""' ,r�.�"'{' : �.a`4`- :i} f,%r,-L ;x" (ti't p•.;�U.: f 1 1 P it k ..•'3� ,\v Of f,.�f,'.b ,4. ,{ \i. a Pb,i.� fr C t�� 5 I'�n'}R. A'• l i ..�, t l�N. ' S� 'i f a � ', 3'4�< - F 1 J` `,�^{� ''e�" a ,P t c �2.� e ^) �t� ';� 5:� `1 a.M?.J w!y 1 ,�,s � r�•:� r. t, � 1 t �py��i tt S ,lisp ,{` r. � t.tx77t�lzlj,iptt',,1:a.f4Y. fie ,ty�` c'�, :et4 k{4,.X � .1..,.{. 1 f+ as. �►S �i'L! '• ! . t (4 f •.r� t i�ta �:t. `y x�•a 3 .k•ri: (' ..1 .f•t:. i• .l. (+. ty "I .( u ,x �` .i•[+•7"•f ( 1 �7``...k`::�d 1.. .)�,ri. S 1 :,10 t:i:, tt > ff 7 1'. YS(� } ), '4 �,. Fjs `..tr: 1. ��.i:p, +. �+ 4s. ,`y.t Y ;, 7t t '^ � 5'° ri t e t ,_, , �� ._ � ,;�•., a^ 0.�j1. r�� .t i Y� ;`�a�kt1:`t:�'1����. i. .P l.4. 1. �t ;� �i pp 6.ct:l�,t; .fi���,- ,5,. C`pj.."`1�3'.y,>{ .5��'J a•rr� " y.�. Cv �wy.-f\ ':�•,� ` ii.,4. 5�: tz,�•-te,�t'�J. t'.''.T,3t rlt;1':Z? ' '•: �t�'7 4biit' 4u;i:��� i1•s1,���� .: '^'� �``j Sr��'S,:w; li �.ytf,jtl 1 � r.i. ��i tt�tr; i� .} •: . .: it�, � _..(�j`f :7,,�I..H tF'rrt ., ;,{,+,F}-: 'P'a,:.�MR({r 4�.f,•�.c.�l„�.+•,1 tf I�.� X^( .f. .:tlf,l.,�tr.1'•,r..,�;.:,ry�.y, y�,! �yjSY.���,F i^:i ,:4. �t J. -y .t.. •.i l: � b t t, .! ..4 f W»., ,!. - of•."i� 1"4• , I t."- _ 4ti ,.IFI. ` ) t'f•hL r• {i �,•. }, .'.(f..'L. �.�.,r,t � eta, � pi.rt � *, '�i W.�.:€,, r•- �•.,-Ly � " .,±�G�"1: ' i'.:...• :i .:��iar l,<• :S , Rs t7�t'tt:o ,�H�....'�"�...,. a`:I •���t�•1 ..1.,f�1:1A,' , I jI� >�f.'•..,�, f � -1�,. <v.+6{ t��.tY. 3 ..;_ 1 JL a( . � � l(`�j��je `l..` T" ', '1•'f )�(!`.. �'{,4�t ` "'x!��l1 4 � Y^1 1 ) ..l. :•t' ,t:,. 1`_ �,, "a 11111111��t.f;i,(,�P D.,r.: S X�!' ti, i x iti y,, } s,ri.KS�i '' '�J 1 ,'t RESIDENT **CR 4011 RESIDENT **CR 4811 1103 WALNUT 1301 WALNUT APT 3. APT 2 111)Nr1NGUM BCH CA 92641) 11UNTINGMN HCFI CA 92648 R1:511)lYI *OCR 41111 RESIDENT **CR 41111 I J06 WWI-Niff 130f, WALNUT APT 6 : APT 5 41.14TINGTnN ETCH CA 9264H 111INTItIGTl1N HCH CA 92648 , RESILIENT **CR 4811 RESIDE CT, **CR 4811 1 '346 WALNUT 13Qf, 11ALNl1T 4F.►.r At)r.'l HU11 T LNG TnN ETCH CA 92648 nuttr i NGTON OCIt CA 92640 RE:SIBE NI **CR 41111 RESIDFNr **CR 41111 285 1 S TH Sr. 20..13 T11 ST Apr, .11 APT .A flUNIIIJGTIIN BCH CA 926411 HUNTINGTON fiCll CA 9264A RFSIDE:VT **CR 481E RisID1:NT **CR 4011 -109 1.31`11 Sr 109 13TH ST APT It APT;'4 tiUt�rINGTUN Udit CA 92648 1tUNTINGTnN BCI1 CA 92640 RESILIENT **CR 4611 RESIDENT . . **CR 4811 219 13TH ST 221 13TIt ST HUNTINGTON OC11 CA 926413 HUNTINGTON HCH CA 92648 5� RE!;IUEVT **CR 411111 REESIDENT **CR 4H11 ' 225 1:3111 5T 1303 OLIVE HUllrl'JGTnN 13C11 CA 92640 HUIITINGTIIN ITCH CA 92640 ►tES10M **CR 4811 RESIDENT *OCR 4811 t 1315 nLIVE AV 1315 OLIVE AV OF 5 ANT 4 ItUt1TINGTON ©CII CA 92640 HUNTINCTnN BCH CA 92648 s RESIDENT **CR 4811 RESIDENT. **CR 4811 1315 OLIVE: AVE 1.311E OLIVE AVE APT t IIUNrlUGTON 1101 CA 926413 IfuNrINGTnN HCH CA 92648 ,ti r RESIOFNT **CR 4811 RESIDENT *#CR 481E 1338 fIL IVE AVE 1366 UILIVE AVF 11UNTHGTIIN ETCH CA 92648 HUNTIllGrON BCH CA 926411 •'1 RESI1)EflT f*CR 40I1 RESInEt1T **CR 481E i 305 Wit Tit Sr 311 13TIl ST 1 IEUN r I NG TJN RCH CA 92648 lillN r l UG rl)N RC1t CA 9264 H RESIDENT *(OCR 4E11 t RESIOE`1T **CR 4811 32.3 . 13T1t ST 325 l sTlr ST rlUr1TINGUM RC1,,A 92646 11UNTING�4 RCN CA 926411 ` r R. a�f LI:k>ra\�i(� 'Yrs+" �WY��i':Irs,rlY,a:k�t�A a +', 1T. '•1' .3, .t'•' ;. ` ^r .t'^� �.�t�Y�;!�"ri •t• :�a`�`• ''„ j��ti ; (�"r:��ri r+�'rt',.y.��.yj'', t4•xit..�s't',`.+}J." tFR = �.� 't \.�bt°.1,'C';.v a; �L r •��".�,} fs'3: 4. .a 1 i� .:•Y 1. ,,...i�, ? kc K�'4''.7' �•, -".•x ,, {�i{. 'i 2'r[ l. t`�l' '• 1.Kr 1 .1, i4" t. a{t'.` .,,,i J!i'r. t. , `d4 "� �1(`�y iC i' �t ,.{t, ,}.t i'.�,1^.:+;'.sy° :.�5 !.j� }.. yK•Js�. J 'C,Kr '�� 6{�� �'.... ,, f. t t,{.` ,1#�4.A..#{ :.L•1{'.�F.."a`�1, �} •�'Jti"^t' { ��:..��. ?{ll ^��. _ x?. t# :fit{i- IK.! 1t: ,{•' tK.1;. F ,}; ���, i $� '� Jr'4 .Y 'S:y ay.•i,i t, r 7"1?.��,{, ��.47.. u t,.,#'" tt° \t,:t`. �''' t J ,1' .,2s S•xt t' i.{ A. .t y ;, �+{.. „ 'S Xt.4 ,'•" '' 'S "•5' t»�1� S.t ,.{i: ': .{ is -,> : z., y, .r r ..,:`:, .. r .• ,�..,. b:�, } t ,1y.4 It t 7r,'.x: aJ`�;•! .r F ,1 "...,ati a,lb, J,} i i �;�4 ..• , t J. 14 .,,"� <al �, 1. � 11�.., J,J. ! '"f•; 4, `ac,L, J �Fy t1 t•s 'x t� ! t �, .,� t � ... f'`� t� t*..ti+'tk"iK•:�� .� 'r., �:•r �. rrJS. '.a,,t- r:t/ .,. r :,, .-f !�.^ i4tf._ �L �t'c-. S S `j` '^,;'t i ,K 3 l ••�y t. �{r +i+,•y 7�.,b �r'`itt i { •>-- 4,.. t��[�� 1.'��1. S+':1'rJt� '�l h�.Y �K r t S,�,t {t\a.y,s d�:,lr�Y tl •i�r('L�. .,, t„)tK,:� tv,�5,s� .,{se;..+[ Sj t1.S'•[, a,'Y, !,t:�:i,�'� :�•��i,s :\` 1 r s ".>. R j``' i.FG.J;Y.�e. t�'i.��i_f! i„t# ru :,y,e:t t,: lty4�j;y,? �„ ttu,h � 'l:rs,•s..;�, }'f .=� t 'pf t.x. J`'s4,1�' � ,� 7y ,�t y \� ft�2;' �, '{.` Y��!{'�,, •)a << 't,'P�,t'✓ S7 ,� 'A �i�':1 IS A. r Ga.lif.f',,t`�• ,k r41,.,?b't.S rt�l�+;r,��'�'.11'dt) f. ,b:;5� t r'�}tfii•rp-«a f•1.L1 �.i�iTt tTt{{t.:'.}„�,.a1.t ,}1.1Y} "1 f 1 t+'aL;wh 4y.t !-lt�'f ey '1• •'�.t �t. ta.':1<s''.1:1 5{J ,t,J,3,; jy ;' �. x{, f( 'i1i$� =rt ,,k.fR 1`,e:;{.{.a` �`+ ` S,t x1� ,r .':��'1, .c^�it _I5' tt �{,,;:g� , < .t '�It�gg a>P�.s.�rsw• "" .:,Fe;I: �•,I E xt:., '• s,,{� ,r 1'4,aSS..t"t,a ..J { 1 Y;Y..'\''4 t,l.a�x'1� t at."s� :; �.' t a, ..x tF � , ,i'`�s F' t!4. rt.. .. s •, 4f'. { bt' ftt�`Y; ,t` �,S'I t:tn�t ,�; :�s .<`�.t�. ,. }\' �,: '� ..,1's••, i 5{ Ji! 'y a+6� 75 > :,? ;�<`+.,tv, •s, .�; >r5.,4. *�l�d� •.Y .� �•. +�,.t�•. aa�t 3 [�t,',,�,(i'�c , .�"C'hK�r" e� ,�;1 �u``Y. ���l��x ;.? Y1•}.1S' ,^.,�1,,• f,4.r�•«lt\r,},. '�,^ ,•} r�����` � �,t 't��., � '�;;wx; sY�Y ".5 i'�.-i",� �1`: .,', '3 w.� .t l k. t.d/ 3`, �, yJ A/ 5}�- � t.fij 1�Ft �" a� fTx^1, � i .l��t \ ♦ ! �.'t� ��, h\S � (!� �• .�., '4 ;, ,��` ".�t�.• .t �t ::,C� �ly+, .I� `� a��S• s u��! *s �`� '.,� t{ �. °f��K J t• �{"EI, t � A• �� b,�?;� ,u. .�...} ,.:. <� x :? ,t,x t' >k�:,a?:1(t?�#•t�. ....r�...�,.,..+......:....:.lr�^:,._ft�.#l:,c:{'j�,�.r ��"�' ,�.t,r,�... ,.,�'F# _'K 27 y+'�v� .sue'; .. - - '- .; .. •. _ .. **CR 4311 REST3.=V **CR 4�11 - RE.SIDE4T *'*CR -4SIV RESIDENT *�'CR #tili �,,.':... .r � : ram• � .+y.-,..w.•:.ram.., .r �"-.. ._�Y:z. •��' '� . . Zi4' 14TH SF 2Z�4 i4TH S7 • 212,-;;,._ .. . �,:,�„«� • 14TH ST 212-14 ,H 5T APT D ADT C APT D APT C -IUITtNG77H BCH CA 9264S 43NTiNGT3N $C4 CA 92649.. HUqTINGT7!i BCH [A 926#s HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92648 REaIv='�T **CR 4811 R= IDE*.T. **CR 4511 RESIDENT, **CR 49I1' RESIDENT. **CR 4811 a- ;:. 210 14TH ST 210 14TH ST 205 14TH ST 20R 14TH S3 -I PT D AST C APT D APT C 1�,3•rTItiGTJs�1 3C:i LA 92f�49 H'JNTI'�GT3FI SCF3 CA 92649 HUNTINGTO4 BC4 CA 92649 HUI:TI!�1GT�N $CH CA 92645 t fill �.- r- RESIDENT *OCR 4811 RESIDEW **CR 4811 RE;IDEtiT **SCR 4811 P.ESiDEKT **CR 481Z _ s Z06 14TH ST 2D6 14TH ST 204 14TH ST 204 14TH 53 APT D APT C APT -D APT C . 3 d -tUNTINGTON BCH CA 92643 tilt+T14GTON BCH C4 92649 14114TINGTON BCH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92648 R=_SIDE NT **CR 4811 RESIDENT **rP. 4?11 RESIDENT **C2 4911 PESIDE4T **CR 4311 202 147N ST 216 14TH ST 216 14TH ST 20Z 14TH ST � �^ .: . - -.s APT D APT C APT '3_ APT A y -„. . , •�" - 3UNT14ST3N BCH CA 92649 HUNTINGTON 3C4 CA 92646 HLMINGTON BCH CA 92643 HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92648 R_SIDEIT **CR 4911 RESIU='+T **CR 4FIl RESIDENT *&CR 4311. RESIDEENT **CR 4611 214 14TH ST 214 14TH ST 212 14TH ST 212 14TH ST z, APT 3 APT t APT. 3 APT A HUtiTINGTJK BCH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON SCA CA 92649 HU4TI4GT3N BCH CA 92649 HUNTING- BCH CA 92648 s *� Q P,ESIDENT **C :y;:---..,f• � ;�»� REStDE'vF **CR 4811 RESID=hT * ,.IZ 4s1I RFSIDINT **GR 4 11 R 481Z 2 208 14T4 ST 210 14TH ST 10 14TH SF 203 14TH ST AVT 3 APT A APT A ApT. A - '= s y '=` ,,` � � "� •�` Hu�1Tt'�1GTON BCH CA 9264s Fi[�'�TI�IGT9N BCHCk 92649 HUVYI'JGT'J►! 9C-4 CA 92649 HU%TI4GTOH 5CH CA 92648 * , • �.*,. o C ** REST�JEyT *4CR 4811 ., RESIDENT **GR 4811 RES!DEN ..it 4_.L1 RESID. rtT tR 011 2D6 i+tTH ST 236 14TH S7 204 I4Tlt S7 2Ct4 1�iTH ST Aa7 a kaT A APT 9 A?T A HUNTIHGTJN BCH CA 92649 HUNT INGT]N 9C4 CA 92649 HU4TINGTON pCN CA 9264Q HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92648 R_StD=&:T **GR 4811 R=SIDE'tT *'SCR tt?IZ RESIDENT **CR 4911 RESIDENT **CR 4911 'l 7 . �" 232 14TH ST 232 14TFl ST i20 14TH ST 119 14TK ST -' rr A)T 5 APT A APT 1 APT D -lJ'.7I►�GTay 9CH CA g2643 HUNTINGTON3C�i CA 9?.54? HU`2TI!vsTntA aGH CA 92645 NUNTI%GTnN BCH CA 92648 �i'£`-'?,.,"`s!-r:r''`i: - . . . - - .- - .. - .,�..-.......�....• wry' -- r ri r ?ESIDENT. **CR 4811 RESIDENT **CP. 4811 RESIDENT; **CR 4911 RESIDENT **CR 4811 326 13Tti ST 326 13TH ST 326 13TH ST 326 13TH ST APT 4 APT 2. APT 5 APT 3 HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92649 WNTINGT3N BC4 CA 9M3 HU4TI NGTOM 8C4 CA 92643' HUtITIUGTI. N gC4 CA 92648 ' RESIDENT 4-11CR 4811 RESIDENT. RESIDENT **CR 4511 RESIDENT **CR 4811 010 326 13TH ST 324 I3TH ST 324- .13TH ST 324 13T4 ST -,� .x f A' 1 APT 4 APT-_3 APT 2 4UNTIHGTON BCH CA 9264B HUNTINGTON P' CA 92648 HUNT I NGTON 'BC4 CA 92643 HUf,TIN(;TC 92648N BCH CA RESIDENT **CR 4811 RESiDEhT *:SCR ►B11 RESIDENT **CR 4S11 RESIDENT **CR 4911 324 13TH ST 322 13T ST 322 -.I3T14 ST 322 13TH ST APT 1 APT a APT 3 APT 2 -� ` 43hTINGT3N BCH CA 92648 HUNt ';TON BC-4 C: 92648 H1hTIyGTaN 9tN LA 92649 HUtITINGT7N BCH CA 92648 4 ^•, , Rc5IJEVT **CR 4811 iDc NT **CR 4811 REST DENT. **CR 4911 R=SI }ENT ** R iR11 322 13TH ST -,3 13T4 ST 32D 13TH ST 320 13T4 ST "'PT 1 APT C APT 3. APT A H11hTIySTON BCH CA 92648 NJNTI�tGTDN 9C'� CA 9264�? HUNTINGTON BC4 C4 92649 HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92648 RESIDENT **CR 481i RESIattiT **CR 4EII RESIDENT **CR 4P11 RESIDENT **CR 481I 316 13TH ST 312 13TH ST 312 13TH ST 310 13T4 ST iUNTINGT3N BCH CA 92648 AD K A PT. 3 HUMTINGT'IN BCH CA 92649 ' " • HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92648 - "UNIT INGTDN SC4 CA 92649 CR 4911 RESIDENT DENT **CR 4 811 ► �' ::=`' R=�I7=!�T **CZ 48�, RESIDENT **CR 481I' RESIDENT ** c 339 13TH ST 336� 13TH ST 1215 CLIVE AVE 222. I4TH ST HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BCH CA 92648 APT 9 APT E HUNTING79N 9C4 CA 9264S HUNTI4ST ON BCH CA 92649 wrY---- RESIDENT **CR 4811 RESIDENT **LR 4911- RFSIDEVT **CR 4811 RESIDENT **CR 4911 ;w «y 222 14TH ST 222 i4TH ST 222 � 14TH ST 222 14TH ST ADT D APT C APT S APT A ' 4UNTINGTDN BCH C'A 92648 HUNTINGT7N BCH CA 92�i4a HUNTINGT3N 9CH CA 92649 HUNTINGTnN BCH CA 4264f� •'��iv , f R_SI3E4T **CR 4811_ RESID NT **CR 4811 RESIDENT **CIE 491I RESIDENT aACR 4811 2iB-112 14TH S: 218 14TH ST 216. 14TH ST 216 14TH ST i:ItiTiNGT3H SCR CA 92648 H:INTINGT]tti 8C4 CA 92648 APT 7 APT " HUtiTI NGT04 BC►! CA 92643 HUNTTMGTCt: BCH CA 92648 lip liz- low_.... -... Lai - _ _ FO COUNCIL - ai)Mih!STPA'YUH COMMUNICATION CA 85-46 To Honorable Mayor and F rom Charles W. Thompson, City Council Members City Adininis.rator Subject C©ASTAL DEVELOPMENT Date June 13, 1985 PERMIT NO. 85-4 The attachments (referencing Planning Commission Coastal Devefopment Per_ No. 85-4 "Pier House") are being forwarded for your information and comments, sho6ic •:u care to 60-ce them. ,The Planning Commission continued this matter with the req: that staff secure:'Input from the City Council. The specific input which'th a Pianri. Commis- slon is seeking.is whether the City Council would confirm the 5eptembex 1984 c 1gn/ development criteria approval for the Downtown Specific Plan. Yo'u will:se'e that,this matter'was prepared as an "RCA:t However, It ahoulrl h oted . thtit the City Council could be called back Into"this �rocess if the matter.,is ht upon appeal. For the.City Council to review the matter as a formal agenda , at this time, and,take a formal minute action,could raise a question of:prejudict ,, t should subsequently be appealed. Therefore; the partinent materials are being for ti,arded for information! so that the City Council will have the .iecessary background to pur,om ,�- any course of action deemed advisable. (, 'AIso:attached Is a:letIter to the,City Council from Peter VonElten, Executive Vice Fres- ldent for Wa,Developme' nt Corporation. Should any rn:mber of the City Council desire additional information or have questions, please advise. Respectf submitted, Charles W. ompson, City Administrator CIYT:pj Attachments `1 .Py.x.'.IV jj�tx r 4 it ���Y ! ' i� , t♦ } T ��1 T YYVCCC '� 1 "�. ►.k _. t.P .t �1aQ ' '�,\�t�. /'. jYF. ti ..} ... ,l'1:.. �� .�?_. .I 1 , : t �sdr. ��). n .:��i: � s� REQUE.. i FOR CITY COUNC;... ACTION -� Date June 7, 1985 bmitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council Submitted by: Charles Vt. Thompson, CityAdministrator Pmpered by: James W. Pali.n, Direct r-, 'Development Services �I' T N $ Subject: COASTAL AEVE1rOPMENT PER 3I Q. 5-4 "PIER HOUSE" Consistent with Council Policy? [ j YerN New Poiicy o Exception Ste rment of Issue, FRecomftmJation,Analysis, Funding Source, temadve Actions,Attachment:: STATEMENT OF •ISSUE: x On June= 91 1985�, the. Planning Commission continued :Coaastal 1=r Development Permit No. 85-4, a request 'to` construct. a .105-unit: condominium project.'`on 3.07 acres of property on the inland siide;,'of Pacifi c .Coast Highway between 12th and 13th streets, until .the June 18 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission directed Staff to,transmit. the approved-. : plans (Con41ti6nal Use Permit No. 84-•19"•and Tentative. Tract •12238 �. to the City council in order to confirm that the September 1984 design is valid today for the Downtown. RECOMMENDATION: t The.. Planning Commission and Staff •'recommend that the City Council review. tte design of "Piet House" and transmit to the' Planning Commission any •comments and/car concerns through a •minute action. F� rther, �the Staff has attached a communication. from the Planning Commission which addresses the concerns with the project. ANALYSIS 71 The,.applicaht 'had elected to process. the' project known as "Pier . House' in two steps. The 'first step,-for,-approval of the -CUP and Tentative .Traat, went before the Planning,"Commission and was approved on September 5, 1984. Rather than process-.a coastal development permit .to the Coastal . Commission at- that time the applicant: decided to ,wait until the City had rei:eived its LCP certification, and then process the coastal permit through the City. The second step occurred on .June 41 1984. The coastal permit is presently pending before the Coastal Commission. The Commission at its meeting of June 4, 1985'1' raised concerns with its ,previous_appruval of• the project. In rethinking the project, in light of the bulk, ;height and density as reflected on elevation drawings and as compared against recently constructed projects of � Flo 41" .. - �yyoy:.. the,:same size and height, the Commission decided to refer the project to. the City .Council for clarification and direction specifically with regard to this project and more generally with `. regard to the development atandards in this district in the Downt`ovin Specific Plan, ATTACH14ENT: 1. Site Plan,' Floor Plan, Elevation 2. Transmittal from •Planning Commission 3. Conditions of Approval JWPiHZ:k1a (2621d) :. .. 4. Ci - -7 Y - , I RCA -- 7/7/85 -2- (2621d) .:. . . ---�..«arr...rsa:r�•+.++•...........�«..._.._.._._ ...�.r.ra.r.r.«•a„rwrm•».avrais�,a«a•r-clxwxw..ie]]jLi..�.i.r'i4..'�'� ...........f._.... �. oil, T-TTc ..r tip BESTIF)""JOTOGRAPrix is REPRODUCTION POSSIBLE, DUE TO 'AGE AND CONDITION .�k OF ORIGINAL D 1,0.C N rs 4 ;f J. AT t' t i.v3.ti J+i�•�+S .sFk ,1. ��i.Zr��,Cf,;!c:i�.L�:r�.'�'�'<�tr.:rt.,;;��4y`•,`ryyi�'��.'.,'.+;..�ti,;, ��, •.`.� ,•. --,�� t• �` •� b.\.ISYL-=."��.-1S..T''�El�`S.M'S.1:•'.:.'L�.'i'f'C:aS.•...'..R:..!7,.�........f..•�.�..(•."� , •..ti.••..�. .. + �. • I ^2 � r . u r i} � ' ' • 13 U 1 1 L. i{� � .. w. r r r • 7 I � LE LH lilt PIER HOUSE r • • 1 t. �- _ ._._:_••••..ram ,Rsi9,1•: •r...r....«• l �� . + Ii .»_.. ..... „•ice......._._. _._.__•._... .. f Nan = s + a Huntington Beach' �. � {2 �Malt MrW:+nynl l:ayarttKn *.It„e",.••.. 0rr.\t.•M to•tat ~' wuuus AVVOX I 00, I - � �• � rw.w w w n..wqw "� . s ul f . .-.__ " =' it - �L - �• ��' • Pgwc Cc Mr ti OVEMA r �' ( . . . i .i' do , y.:'' 11 !!U Lti�✓li LI*l:J '0 ':' I Itsco is r-rlrserrs:� � +�leis- bit o ID fol t t f • i r • -."'�'=,���emu. :� � o . . a . �Ic J• iJ.'S'^""' c::7'f3'..►aw+-•--••+-,�. -w,-..-.�.,.r+.urn.....�...+..,,....-•-----'"_�..._.....-.-......,.,-.�.�:.«.:r,.:•,•.:.»"i'�:..i•K.JI:,.-� ;':c�.z.:.- ,CCU.«�;.stT.Tkr.►Eaa�ci+tas�s.o-•+.+c.Ri.. • 1 � • I • • 'I 1 . a l � r . r...-�_ _tom_...l • �w+ } ., (54 ; i t 1 i AJ' rb�r SV ]rd FL" .� 3w� - Q' ISO FL OWN SEC7M B 3 JHSL] 0 Q : \ nlrn rlwieou....�r- . ni�rwrnr+! - � i �• 1 � *i M•r� PW E��VATfOl�l ra _ • .. ����-` _ _iLwiiiiaii�rlrL.Y(i. ., ..� •'i.• `�'�..�� � -. -. 1-3 �f • r.>v.r. • !;.flitlfn�.IM�• � 1 1 � . i r 3r ' � 1ln 1lMlf • _ .• a ����arlrr � �r • .♦ i. • - • • • � ii • ti WAL14LUT-. AVEPM ELEVATION . ca. a ❑ L , ,rr i a . r Ju Jr - r .!■�1y�.1 • ■ ►�+} '� --'�'�•�—r r-mac I It s ■ ■ cl _ ssti.� y�' �,,,� K �'' � .���•! { ¢ f � � ,III -� � �^� �.y ELEVATKAi - ...�'�.` Z�;�l1f.•' iA'"�■a... M�ea .rne....si,.-,�..`�t� > �.rF.1i�s;+ �• i P �NCC , • � t R ' i I t • ! r G .�� iLs+r• tee••. ..• . � .ire• -"e- �'�•• t.1. k �3TH STREET El • E:EYATaON' 4 D , { Lr �a .. r 4 , o� i �flflCf for.. •. OdINdr. ;rr: it:l1A trRurJ'Z,.,: fe"W'drE. LA , -' � � ... � tri���►r•, ;;:�ri'iii-=_,..�,�..;t.. ' -'=. . , . 'll�tatTl" A'.tI . t� 1 T !� • � . V Icy. t•• .. ; `.. .—. ►. _ .., fit..• N. . ..PU /tJ I fditf r tfrJJ"ayf:/7 JY/f.1717 s►Y«✓,f r.A�Nt! :4.047r tlttN!IYh:�t'M.' w. 11 ..� �.. {_ '�'�. .. �. .. •'�� ;..-•- ! AfArZ f IVf:ir/.@&*#If Off n J't4 A70 k'Itt k all I .,^ ' ���! -_ 1 ; } J JftKt A'�IM+T.'sY.1et fJJr JJof.:+fZt � 1 v ; ! i M, � ~ tar rear. . ' •_ �._._� � t'v INC Bp 1 r _ r `' � ! � ! � tit•, 1 .tA Idf !/I Ol.90dflA.r T0,1' 'dt/tA; t,Ittf/,rAt,! "LACT 12238 1 �'> -� I �� �\,:E.. ,� _t .�; �..• ! .� � -' •!`a/! ��_ • �f'I t '10'IOI�'/Il4A'f!R COy�:A�lA7Gtl /tJRr�J:I �qs I E: -� ._=• _ -=._..="i-'� u1.7r 147 i•rr.rtr a:t "Anwa afff ff.rr 0 In, .r r i a; :•t-r,*•? •` IMM1117 JUM R&jr"I rfllfrW if Mf!.'�d<:A ' :, -� �t►i1 •$ ��____ IftfttttlJlJJ7 AJ/f AlCtd!!iIfflfift C/s`7J1,f/!:'f;:l,%. r _ _ errt�• btrrufra . :_:ra.y:rs L TVU(!IV 0 MMICAPT Cl rl:I&1.110> f a,f, -- '•� iv,iJ Ar"t"-W II//J/•*I/tlAr AkMl//11•t",.l.IJ'..r.•J' .. - `. J.if/t Vif a ftw rll Ault.U ra# 1-arw U fra, HnntdNIton Belch Planning HoMtolsslon P.O. SQX 190 CALIFOCi!iIA W4C .. June E, 1985 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council We are transmitting our concerns with Zigard' to- the 'Pier- House" project located on the inland vide of Picific. Coast: Highway between 12th and 13th Streets which was- approved through Conditional Use Permit No. . 84M19 and. Tentative Tract No. 12238. ; Oart of the 'entitlement proveus the applicant ;rust "obtain . . approval :of;.the Coastal:-Development` Permit which i,s..currently pending- befoie..the Planning Commission. As a result oU this ; application (Coastal Development Permit Nc, , 85-4) the following f issues were raised:, 1. is this t3ie`.type" of architectural design (14ecifically in terms of bulk) that the Planning Commission and City Council intended for tt,i Downtown. 2. Is �2 °4E. it'nits- per acre an:-acceptable density for a= one block consolidation? (The Downtown Spe�ifric, Plan ' pirmits. a ,maximum . of 35 .units- per gross. acre on a full block within District 2' of the Downtown Specific Plan Area. ) 3. As a 'xeeultof the additional research generated. by the proposed code amendment for the Oldtown/Townlot and Downtown• Specific Plans, an issue regarding the adequacy of our parking ratio was raised. 4. The Development is"presented as,condominium type ownership, but . can meat. the standards for an Apartment .project; 'does this affect the City Council's view of the propusa13 It, should, be noted that the project meets the development standards set forth 'in the Downtown Specific •Plan. The only Special" permit granted was for railings, patios and balconies to encroach into the setback area. The Planning Commiasion'appreciates any clarification' or' diiecti.on which the City Council can provide in the above stated areas, a sine rerly, 17 .Tom Li engood Chairman, Planning commission TL:jr R�rt'r'�4.tiV�y�iL....r�n.rrrn+�.rars.Vw. .+M. ..VNfn..r...a.r....�...• ti..w.f-..rt.a5.:11..Y'i.tit.•.•., .w r...l,• •. ..s r•.nrNikYe.Y.C..•i.T�3...lfL]►Y•M.M• wr...- [red, 2 Huntington each Planning Comwission P.O. Box 190 CALIFORNIA a2648 Septembe: ,6, 1984 . Mola 8071 Aoauts Avenue Huntington Beach, CA 92648 ' 'RigweSt: 'To permit a 105 unit residential ' condominiUrf development and a' one lot subdivision. ` Subject: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84•-19/TENTATIVE/ TRACT N.o 12230 DATE OF API%RUVAL: September 5, i984 ; FIND,JNGS FOlt SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. - The project contains featuces which provide g000 laiid planning techniques-.with,maximum:use of.'aestheti«LLy pleasing types of architectures Landscaping,- sItt? Layout, ants design., The proposed minor encroachments of `L`ow-profile building walls surrounding terraces,' decks and' access ramps will scot detract. from the Nsoposed development oL surroundinq environment. ( i 2. The' project will not be detrimental- to lthe general health, wrlfare, safety and convenience of the- 'neighborh 1, or, of the arty in general., nor detrimental or Jnjurious to ..he value of i property or improvements in the, neighborhood or' city in ,j general. 4 3. The project is consistent with objectives of tfie duwntown 'b , specific plans standards in achieving a' development adapted to the terrain and compatible with the surrounding ' environment. FIN.. INGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-19ZTENTATIVE :kA4•: NO. L2238: L. The proposed development complies with the ' General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan. . 4 2. The rleneral Plan has set firth provisions for this type `of lao i use, aL well as objectives for implementation of: this type r•f: housing, r e it , 3. The property,was previously studied for this intensity of use ;. at the time the Downtown specific Plan zoning designation was placed on the subject, property. 4. Ttii=Trop&seo . subd•ivision of this• 3.07 acre parcel of land , zoned Uownto4a Specific Plan District 2 is prutiosud to be constructed having 34.2 units per grass acre. 5. Lot, width, depth,: frontage street width' and 'through 'the use of the. special permit. all other design and implementation features of the proposed subdivision are proposed 'to' be constructed in' compliance: with. the; standard plans and ,specifications on file with the City as. well as' in compliance with the state subdivision map back and supplementbry City subdivision uedinance*. CONDITIONS 'OF'APPAOVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. . 84-19: 1. The, site.'plan, floor plans, and .elevations •dates-. August 16;, 1984' shall be the approved layout. 2. Natural 'gas shall be• stubbed in at. the location of cooking facilities, water heaters, ,and •central heating units. Thi; requirement md'y be .waived provided, that the applicant will install a more energy efficient alternative subject to the . review and approval of ;the Department of Development Services. ,. 3 . Na.tural• gas shall ,be stubbed. in at the location•of cooking 'W facilities, water heaters anil central heating units. ' This requirement may,:be waived provides that the applicant will ' install a more_ energy efficient- alternative subject,,'to the review and approval of the Department of Development Services. 4. Low volume heady shall be used on all showers. 5. Ali' building . spoils .such- as unusuable lumber, wire, pipe and other surplus or unusuable materials shall be disposed of at an off=site area equipped -to handle them. 6. Energy= okficient lightling shall be used in open space areas . , 7. All dwellings on the subject •propeity shall be constructed 'in compliance with state acoustical standards -set •foirth for u: ' t: •that are within• the 60 CNEL contour of the property. ' 6. A .O.�tailed soils analysis shall' be prepared by a.'registered sn`irls erigineer. `This analysis shall include on-site -sampling ' and laboratory testing of materials to provide detail recommendations regarding grading, chemical and fuel properties foundations, retaining walls, streets and utilities, etc. 'fiY'•;+y'... :�.:.: .t..:.r...s..»w►....w ,..r»...........,».........«...........•.._..._.___....-....,....._.. ..,u:ns,.w..y..,7-•...--rw•.,,.v .*...... ................+.+,...r-.-r.v...+..•.n.....!..� -• I 9. A •detailed landscape .and sprinkler plan inclu' ding all public and private walkways consistent with the Downtown Specific . Plin ,� halI be, subject to the approval of the Department of : Development Services prior to the issuance of bViiding permitj. 10. The.46cation and design of all entry gates shall. be 'reviewed and. Rpproved by .the Department of Development Services, ( - Public Works Department, and Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. The) Fire- sprinkler systems shall be -installed throughout the development In accordance with National. Fire Protection Standard No. 13 and standards of the Huntington Beaeh. Fire Department. - � 12. All approved drives shall be considered reciuired :flie lanes and shall be signed as such as' deemed necessary by the luntington Beach Fire Department. 13. The method 'of trash' pick-up stiall be subject to the approval of the Department 'of Public'Works. ' 14. The applicant shall provide 'lid using units ' for •persons of low or °moderate"income subject to the provisions of Government .. Secti'od.65590 ' (d) .' The 'applYaants compliance' with Section t,� 65590,; (d) of the Government Code 'in terms of amount and i location of affordable housing provided shall kie. subject to the, review -and -approval' of the ;Department of Development Services', ! is. A wet' standpi pe .system approved •be" {the I Huntington Beach Fire Department- shall be installed thlroughout' the development in' accordance with standards of the uniform building code. ' 16 The architecture of *the, project shall be in compliance with the design concept of the Downtown Specific Plan, 1 6NDITIONS OF'APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO.. liiia:. 1. The Tentative Tract Map 'received' and dated -August 16, . 1994 shall be the approved lalout. . , I 2. The Hater system shall be in accor�.lance with the 'Depar'tment of Public Works, 'standards. . 3. On and off-site sewer drainage and street improvements, shall be -in accordance with` the Department of Public Works' f standards. !. 4. Fire hydrants shall be located in accordance with Fire ( 1 Department's standards. ., �._..... __. - - --_______•_____-___U.. ....... . . _.._._._..___•... _�.....-._.__........ .....,.,.... _.....,,,r.....,c,szrr,;Nn:t..:.::.:ttiomr.R-=- 1 ?09 -: hereby. ce-rtify. that Tencative Tract No. 12238 and Conditional Use Permit No.84-19 was approved by the_ Planning Commission of the City of Huntington teach, California on September 5, 1984, upon the foregoing conditions and citations. Very truly yours, James W. Galin gecretary JWP:tiA:jr (1121d) a Sri fJ74T.. ..s...t':f•».1 «,,...«...,:i.t 1 Xi.'f,;tilii3a.1•.+rrc:.:t U.+ar,i:5t�.x'ts=iA uvusro. 1 i Mola Development 'orporatloll 1 June 11, 1985 i 3 i HUWINGTON BEACH CITY COUNCIL � 2000 Maim Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Re: Planning Commission Coastal Development Pormit No. 85-4 ; Dear Mayor bailey and Members of the City Council: s Attached is our letter of 'June `10, ,19850 explaining our position s• on the above-referenced matter to the. Huntin ton leach Plaanninc. g ,. 'Commission: We undarotana the, Planning Commission has. asked the ' City Council`•.to -review' the design of our proposed development l; P i . and to transmit an comments or concerus: back to the tannin ,-' Y 9 Commission. It ie important for, us to have the_ City' Couneil,'concur in, our re'adoning ,they the •issue.before,,'the.,Planning, Comr.1asion, is, the issuance of a! Coastal'.Development Permit and;not a reevaluation Of the,'Conditional Uaa,Permit. and' Tentative. Traci Map, which were approved,, by the Planning Commission . in Septe2ber of 1984. f.,. The .findings for::approval ;of ,a Coastal Deveiopmenfi Permit relates to compliance with the standards set forth in the ; . Coastal Zane Suffix. The„facts;,and circumstanoee have not changed which would ermit g P a, reevaluation of the project that was previously approved by ' the Planning Commission in September, 1.984. ,,Any reevaluation by t-.. the. Planning Commission under these circumstsnceR would be as though an appeal was filed 10 months after our project was approved rather than the 10 days prescribed by ordinance.' our project clearly mests. all of the requirements as set forth under the Coastal Act and local ordinances. We, would ' respectfully request that the Council, limit• their action to the Provisions of �the Coastal. Zone Suffix. Very yl*� ly yours, MOLA £LO MEET CORPORATION i at r von E1ten, y • Executive Vice President/ _ General Counsel i PEVE/cd '!= attachment .. ._.........—...... .. ....-.,..._.._.__ ..._...._. ...-'-'t'"_.. ,. .. ..._.,...... .......�...rr.n.-......w...... ... ..,,.••.......a,a;.4'a'nr.:1.Y:-.Y::,r...«+t'..'i�-r..:tX''a. ":.i.id'1%Siw."� • j J I 1 Mda' DEvelopro hf'Corporation 8072 Mavis kmfsue Hunt rxjlorr&--WJI.CA 92646 (714)989.13:3 June 10, 1985 Huntington Beach .Planning Commission 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach$ CA 92648 RE: Coastal Development Permit• #85-4 Dear Chairman Livengood ` Members of the Planning Commission: This . letter is in response; to:the Planning" Commi.s3ssfon's action to continue .Coastal Development Permit:485--4 'relating to :our proposal. to develop the Pacific Coast Highway property batween 12th and 13th Street on the inland side: Wa have patiently,waitied' through moratoriums and the adoption of ` Local Coastal Plans sinc'e.we acquizad our interest. in the` Property.in,1978 , .• Since your decision-.leaf September we have spent, approximately t5000006,000 in legal . fease- final architectural -and engineering. plana, We presently anticipate - filing for building permits this July.. Your action to continue the matter iz:eztremely disturbing since` the plan ,is virtually the same plan approved by. the Planning . CoimisvionT-in -Septeiaber 1984: The .Coastal .Development permit would.have been processed concurrently with"Conditional' Use Permit #84-191.and Tentative Tract #12230 if :the City had ,liad ermittin auth r o it at that time. ' Since• .0 p g yt3ie oastal� Cammission� ,was in the process of granting the City permitting authority' we' waited to file 'our application at 'such time as thc� 'authority was granted. H,B. . Planning Commission June 10, 1985 Page .Two ' Vrien-:the..'appxovals, were obtained for the Conditional Use Permit and. Tentative Tract. Map the Planning Commission- stated in' their findings that the proposal complied with the General Plan and the Downtown Specific Plan. . Additional findings were made with regard. s .to consistency with other City requirement . Staff has determined that "the; ' roposed project : is consistent with 'the City'tcoastal Zone suffix .as well, as other provisions of',the . guntington Beach ordinance Code. applicable to .the property; and conforms with the plans, policies, requirements and standards •of ' the City's Coastal Land Use, Plan". We understand the Plannina' Commission's function at this juncture . is to determine that the Project is, consistent with the Focal Coastal Plan and implementing ordinances and .is consistent with Coastal Policies. Itr is.,not. now proper to attempt; to reevaluate the project and, ..ask 'the City Council. "for clarification and. direction . ., with regard to this project". We fe`el' what: the Commissioni, is attempting to do should have been done,. if at all, ten months ago by, way of` appeal to the City Council if the decision of the Planning Commission was to be overturned. With :regard to the specific property there is absolutely no distinction as for whether or,`no%. an' apartment 'compleit or- - condomin�.um development,'is"..constructed. ' 9°he".City Council's . action,'.Nith regard to';adoption of an "Inducement Resolution" . authorised us to pursue tax exempt bond financing for an• • apartment, complex. to• permit us certain flexibility in arriving at the. firial'•.economics for .the project'. ' We ntill haver not made the final; decision .as to what .form of -lifestyle.. will first be F provided �in ` the project. -'Iii all likelihood, e©pecia'lly in todays .economic climate, .,the project wilVbe initially an apartment �complez. Our ultimate •gnal'• howe,*er is to have the project sold In the fuiure' as a condominiiim 'project if the economic: climate is favorable upon maturity of the multifamily housing bonds. e s+ : ' ~� We have worked closely. with Staff to develop'the Property to, its !i present .state.. It: is truly'beyond our .comprehension;='to"think " ! that the Planning 'Commission now• is haAfig }secdhd thoughts about the project. " Our" analysie.of the -law is clear that'the approvals nave been granted, findings`of f act ,clearly: made which ' support the project and that the Planning 'Comiission has, absolutely no authority to reverse itself at this- juncture whether sitting as the Planning Commission or as the Coastal Permitting authority. .. .-.. .. ......r.•+r�...wws........nr+..�.... _....r..-..._.. -..... r.v.«.•rr,:�Ira4V+�r ':i'iR:i w4.w4KXJ:CiMu�' ,per H.B. Planning Commission June 10, 1985 Page Three We will be pre sent. at the June 18, 1985 meeting to respond to any further questions that you may have. very truly yours, MOLA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Peter E. von El`ten,.. Executive 4*ice President/ General Counsel ' PEvE:Iw cc: Frank Moo a Greg Hillgren Richard Barlow j i i• ' a. lid' CITY OF HUNTINGTON DEACH INTER-DEPARTMUST DOMMU TION ���J!' •== nurr.rcnw a'a' :}' 0r H U t cl hti".:i To Charles Fr. Thompson ro James W. Palin, Director City Administratar Development, Services ! Subject PLANN?NG COMMISSION REQUE T Date June 12, 198S POR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF CDP FOR MOLA PROJECT AT 12TH AND PCH A Coastal Development_ Permit , (6DP) is required for developments in' the Coastal zone that are not exempt or categorically excluded. During normal processing; the CDP Mould be considered and acted upon at the same time as any other entitlement, for the project. in this particular case, the CDP would° have been processed at the time that the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Tentative Tract Map were approved. The CDP is designed to give,;special attention to those issues deemed of�:importance by the California Coastal Act and the' City's Certified � Land Use Plan. These include coastal access, visualresources, community facilities, hazards, energy, density,,,height, parking, signs ind, issues relatfnn to water, wetlands and 'environmentallj► sensitive trj habitatu. All of these issues were addressed and provided Jor in the <t Downtown Specific Plan, At the time that CUP 84--19 and Tentative Tract No. 12238 were approved, the' City .had not yet received certification of th'e zonirig portion of the -LCP, and was not. issuing CDPa. V-'the .applicant' had, wanted to ,proceed with ,the,development:, a CDP from the Coastal Commission would have been required. . In viers of the City's approval . of the CUP, . and based on the approved Land "Usel Plan and the .Downtown specific. Plan, staff,:believes that the Coastal Commission would have approved a CDP. However# the applicant waited until the City .regained their permitting authority, and is now requesting City approval of the CDP. The, Ciiy'.s zoning implementation. was certified by the Coastal Commission. as adequate to implement the Land Use Plan policies. This means that, in ,general, if the oevelopment complies with the zoning, ' 1 if will meet the ,test of the findings for a CDP. The. issue of whether the zoning ordinance itself is appropriate for the City is not in question in a CDP application. The subject development, which was approved by t6 Planning Commisston in August of 1984,. lies within -an appealable area of the coastal zone. .. Hr•.:ever,. only 'CDP approvals may 'be appealed. beyond the .Ci ty Council to' the Coastal Commission. Denial of the CDP will mean that the..applicant cannot develop the project, even though the City has already agreed that the project meets the zoning requirements by approving a CUP. 4 Staff is conceirned that denial of this CDP, based on its height, bulk, or density Would not be supportable, . considering the fact that the. Downtown"Specific Plan standards specifically allow developments of .. R'r'1'}Y:�«j!.C�-�-:7.:i:.aJ n..+.wrr1•z+nearw.•r.a..-r......,....., ...__......�"�_".,_-.�..,.w-.•+., raih•.::, •.I to ta,.<�1. •'lrw._..:I N.ta.a...a..cur...aa•u�•a.rnww+r..•+�.-----•• AMIL this: niture., . If the. Planning Commission is', dissatisfied with the. .. ., approved:' zoning•,.'they may recommend; a resolutic+n to •the City Council to chan the allowed standards B. Until { such �re�i�sfons are mide, the staff must continue to recommen approval of the CDP based on compliance of the project with the certified LCP. JWP:JAF:kla cz�ela� r S, rA J• t f7 4 :L 1 . ►'•'S`71v"'ji4�-=:Ga.<aw...,rwr+...,..+..+y....n.,.wrw...ww...+..•••..... ....._....... �... ......—..W•.raaw•ti tea,at+� •, ••. t, :kY�'� .erf.+Jl _ = .. .f •r ti .Rr.:W..•tJ.::.'.:.:�.tr7.•.:. .et.•Catt.jy:'U';137'AtJAYrvw�.wr..........-•'.. —;i^`�