Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMitigated Negative Declaration 03-08 - Conditional Use Permi NOTICE OF APPEAL TO PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION f: OF Date of Planning Commission Action TO: Planning Dept. (2 copies) DATE: City Attorney (1 copy) FILED BY: loe 6 ��lZ V61i q/, L L—.�(j 7. REGARDING: Tentative Date for Public Hearing: Ta7- 26 Copy of Appeal Letter attached. LEGAL NOTICE AND A.P.MAILING LIST MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE Joan L. Flynn � City Clerk X5227 Fee Collected �� DIOCESE OF ORANGE 4 fl�f1 i `ICYI =rti; ' OFFICE OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES � ► httpi//www.inovoa.(arcbo.org/ : MARYWOOD CENTER P. O. Box 14195 2811 E.VILLA REAL DR. ORANGE, CA.92863-1595 (714)282-3012 FAX:(714)282-3124 http://www.rcbo.or_q/ November 19, 2004 City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Appeal of Planning Commission Action, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 Good Shepherd Cemetery Dear City Clerk: The purpose of this letter is to formally Appeal the Planning Commission's actions at their November 9, 2004 meeting, wherein they approved the above subject Mitigated Negative Declaration (Neg. Dec.). The Diocese of Orange, at 2811 Villa Real, Orange, CA., the owner and operator of the Good Shepherd Cemetery, is the proponent of the project and the appellant. The Diocese is requesting this Appeal for several reasons, the primary one being that the Diocese disagrees with portions of the final Neg. Dec. Report, and was not allowed to make a full presentation on key pertinent master planning issues at the November 9, 2004 Planning Commission meeting, apparently because the related imposed Neg. Dec. Findings and Development Requirements were deemed to be"Code-related"and not subject to the review of the Planning Commission. It is our contention that the issues in question are not Code-related, and should have been contained in the Conditional Use Permit Staff Report, and open for discussion. We know that several items have been drafted and modified during the four years that this project has been in review at the City, so we are not convinced that these items have been officially codified into the City's Codes. By separate letter (attached) we have requested that the City Attorney review whether these items are within the purview of the Planning Commission's approval. e Please note that this Appeal has been submitted in order to retain future rights, and is limited to the above subject Mitigated Neg. Dec. approval. In as much as the other portion of the project's proposal, the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 00-63, has not yet been approved and has been continued to a special meeting to be held December 7, 2004, the Diocese respectfully requests that the processing of this Appeal of the Neg. Dec. be placed `on hold', until after the Planning Commission's final action on the CUP. DIOCESE OF ORANGEa• OFFICE OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES � r http://www.inovoa.((Drcbo.org/ MARYWOOD CENTER ,11 P.O. Box 14195 2811 E.VILLA REAL DR. ORANGE, CA.92863-1595 (714)282-3012 FAX: (714)282-3124 http://www.rcbo.org/ November 19, 2004 Chair Ron Davis Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08, Good Shepherd Cemetery Request for Clarification Dear Mr. Davis: The purpose of this letter is to request clarification of the Planning Commission's actions taken on the above subject Negative Declaration on November 9, 2004.. It must be noted at the outset that the cemetery business is unique and not like most commercial ventures, and in light of recognizing these differences, the Diocese simply requests what is fair and equitable. At the November 9 h meeting, the Diocese began to address positions in the text and a few of the Mitigation Measures in the Negative Declaration that we did not agree with. We were not allowed to make our full presentation on our positions on key pertinent master_ planning design issues apparently because the related imposed Negative Declaration 'Conditions' and Development Requirements were deemed to be "Code related" and not subject to the review of the Planning Commission as indicated by City staff. If these items were not under the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, then why was the Planning Commission asked to approve these items without hearing our position on various items that are, in our opinion, not code related issues? It is our contention that the following items below are not "Code related" and should have been contained in the Conditional Use Permit Staff Report, and open for public discussion: We have listed the main items of our concern and included our proposed amendments as follows (as referenced in the November 2, 2004 correspondence regarding Development and Use Requirements): 1. Item 1.c., Storm Drain Pipe Design: We propose that the system be allowed to utilize the on-site drainage systems towards providing detention capacity; this is an industry-wide standard alternat6 accepted by other governmental agencies, and we propose the following revision: "Furthermore, the proposed on-site drainage system will not be permitted to provide any required detention capacity unless it is demonstrated in the final hydrology and hydraulics study that the retained storm water in the pipe(s) would Pet negatively impact the existing upstream or private properties or cause flooding onto Talbert Avenue." • Page 2 November 19, 2004 2. Item 1.c., Detention .Basin Design: We propose that the detention basins be constructed with concrete vertical walls instead of earthen 5:1 slopes. The rationale for the 5:1 slopes is unclear, since the City does not have a set of detention basin specifications. The Cemetery is confident that it can design and construct a vertical wall facility that will meet all of the City's operational requirements. The Cemetery's proposed design will make maintenance easier. Instead of utilizing a backhoe to scrape large sloped grass areas clean of debris and silt deposits, the Cemetery's design will concentrate the debris and silt, and will provide easier access, which will allow for more efficient maintenance clearing with a front-end loader. The Cemetery's design is more sensitive to its surroundings. The Cemetery proposes to encircle the basins with a secure wall, which will then be heavily screened with landscaping, which allows for the noisy and visually obtrusive maintenance activities to occur behind a visual and acoustical barrier, and thus have less impact on the somber and sacred Catholic religious practices. The Cemetery's proposed design is also a more efficient use of the land. The City's design,which is a frustum, utilizes 50% more private property than the Cemetery's design. Other developments can find dual use for temporary detention basins; however, basins in a cemetery cannot have such dual use because interments are never made in an area that is subject to flooding (except in New Orleans.) In as much as over 85% of the Cemetery will be landscaped, there is no need to encumber any remaining valuable land for an indeterminate period of time for slope areas that cannot be utilized in any fashion because they may be underwater for a few short days a year. The Cemetery's revised language follows: "Slopes within the earthen detention areas met can be steeper thaR 5A Maximum vertical." 3. Item 1.c, Detention Basin Freeboard: Please provide clarification for the following statement: "Additionally, the proposed on-site detention basins shall be designed to maintain 1-ft. minimum freeboard (measured from the top of the respective detention basin)during the 100- year storm event." 4. Item 1.c., Storm Drain System Maintenance: The Cemetery respectfully requests that the Public Works Department be consistent with its past practices, and continue its maintenance of the existing native water course, and accept responsibility for any portion of the facilities that are constructed per the City's Master Plan of drainage, including a vertical wall detention basin. In as much as the improvements to the Cemetery are anticipated to be phased, the Cemetery expects the City to assume responsibilities as each portion of the improvements consistent with the City's Master Plan is completed. Therefore, the Cemetery proposes that the entire following paragraph be deleted: QFaRge that deSGFibes the GR site deteRtiGR aFea(s) and steFm draiR system, the maximum Felease Fate tentionMraiRagesytem • Page 2 November 19,2004 Please find attached the required check in the amount of$2,335.00 If ave any questions, please contact me at 714-282-3012. ince ely, Joe voa, Direc r of Const ction, Diocese of Orange Cc., Howard Zelefsky,Director of Planning Scott Hess,Planning Manager Herb Fauland,Principal Planner Paul Da Veiga,Associate Planner Leone Mulvihill, City Legal Counsel Terri Elliott,Public Works JN/df f • Page 3 November 19, 2004 5. Item 1.e., Existing Storm Drain System: The Cemetery requests that the City accept maintenance of the existing 36" pipe from Talbert be accepted by the City, in the event that the pipe is shown to be sound. The Cemetery therefore proposes the following revised language: "Additionally, any portion of this pipe that is currently located beneath the existing mausoleum and is shown to be in a sound working condition shall not be re-aligned..." a ppliGable GG,4nfir Sta RdaFds and RE)t aGGepted by the City `RgiReer." 6. Items 4.a.2., 4.a.5., 4.s., and 41, Fire Sprinklers: Throughout the various reports and findings, there are conflicting conditions regarding the installation of fire sprinklers. Some of the requirements appear to be mandatory, while others, such as 4.a.5. are conditional (i.e. '...if required...'). The Cemetery's position is that each building will undergo a separate review by the Fire Department, and if required, fire sprinklers will be installed. At the present time, the Cemetery anticipates the possible installation of a fire sprinkler system in the maintenance portion of the Maintenance/Garden Crypt building in Phase I, but not in the Garden Crypts or the Mausoleum. The Cemetery therefore requests the following revisions: Item 4.a.2.: "Construct private on-site water system to provide domestic and fire service, if required, to the proposed maintenance building(s) and mausoleum." Item 4.s.: "An automatic fire sprinkler system will be installed tl;Feugher:+t. in those facilities requiring such a system." Item 41: "A Class II wet standpipe shall be installed. in those facilities requiring such a system." . 7. Item 4.a.6., On-Site Irrigation Water Well: The Cemetery respectfully disagrees with the City's requirement to abandon its existing well if it switches to City water in the future. The Cemetery recently completed an extensive rehabilitation of the well, and replacement of the pump and pump control systems, and expects them to be utilized for several decades hence;'this upgrade was sized to handle the build-out of the Cemetery's grounds. The only extenuating circumstance that may occur that would cause the Cemetery to request City water would be if the Cemetery's water supply was impacted by circumstances out of its control, such as seawater intrusion into its aquifer. Because well drilling and pump placement is capital intensive, the Cemetery requests that the well and pump systems be allowed to remain in-place after being disconnected, in the event that the water supply under the Cemetery returns to a usable condition. The Cemetery requests the following changes: "A single sew-_e c9f Shall sep,�e all iF�gatk)R Reeds af the existing and pFE)pGsed developm A separate irrigation water service, meter, and backflow prevention device may be installed to serve the existing and future irrigation system(s) • Page 4 November 19,2004 8. Item 4.c., Tree Report: Because the Cemetery already has a significant number of trees on-site, the Cemetery requests that the required report on existing trees be limited to those impacted by construction, and requests the following revision: "Prior to the submittal of a landscape plan, the applicant shall provide a Consulting Arborist report on all the existing trees impacted by construction, if an With this letter, we are .requesting that the City Attorney's Office review whether or not these items are within the Planning Commission's jurisdiction. In order to maintain all of our rights, we are anticipating filing a formal Appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the project's Mitigated Negative Declaration. However,we will request that this Appeal not be submitted to the City Council until after the Planning Commission's final actions on the project's remaining Conditional Use Permit approval items. As a final separate item, we are preparing the additional exhibits and submittals regarding the architectural issues that were raised at the November 9 h meeting for presentation at the special meeting scheduled for December 7, 2004. As always, if you have any questions, or if I can be of any other assistance, please contact me at 714-282-3012. ,Resp ctfully Joe ovoa Direc or of Con ruction, Diocese of Orange Cc: Howard Zelefsky,Director of Planning Scott Hess,Planning Manager Herb Fauland,Principle Planner Paul Da Veiga,Planner Leone Mulvihill,Legal Counsel Terri Elliot,Public Works JNldf CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 2000 MAIN STREET CALIFORNIA 92648 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK JOAN L. FLYNN CITY CLERK March 29, 2005 Mike Padian Padian Team Consulting 14 Crucillo Dr_, Ste. A Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Re: NOTICE OF ACTION —Good Shepherd Cemetery Appeal Dear Mr. Padian: The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach at its regular meeting held Monday, March 21, 2005 took action on the following Public Hearing: Public Hearing Opened and Continued Open from March 7, 2005 to Consider Appeal Filed by Applicant Mike Padian, Padian Team Consulting, of the Planning Commission's Approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 - Good Shepherd Cemetery, 8301 Talbert Avenue (N/E Corner of Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue). The action agenda pages 7-9 and the approved as amended Findings and Conditions of Approval are enclosed. In addition, the City Council directed staff that in the event that the applicant would like to pursue a conditional use permit to allow perimeter fencing in excess of 42 inches in height within the setback area along Newman Avenue, the CUP would be heard before the City Council. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office at (714) 536-5227_ Sincerely, 0�- jigo-) Joan L. Flynn f City Clerk Enclosure: Findings and Conditions of Approval Action Agenda Pages 7-9 cc: Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director Scott Hess, Planning Manager Paul Da Veiga, Associate Planner (Telephone:714-536-5227) FINDINGS MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL—MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty(30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63. 2. Mitigation measures are recommended to avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the project, as mitigated, will have a significant effect on the environment. (MND 03-08) Attachment 1.1 Summary of Mitigation Measures Description of Mitieation Measure Impact Potential flooding 1) On-site water detention basins shall be incorporated into the site design to downstream caused by the temporarily detain runoff on the subject site. elimination of two natural a) Historical volumes using cross-sectional areas that are perpendicular to drainage swales with the the longitudinal (N-S) centerline of each "historical basin shall be proposed project calculated to identify the size of on-site water detention basins. b) The design of the detention basins shall provide for earthen slopes not to exceed a 2:1 slope ratio. Inadequate design of 2) All easements, storm drains, and detention facilities shall be designed per detention facilities may City and applicable County standards and approved by the Public Works result in a lack of storage Department. capacity and future maintenance issues (MND 03-08) Attachment 1.2 (7) March 21, 2005- Council/Agency Agenda - Page 7 ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, March 17, 2005. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk. 1. Staff report 2. City Council discussion 3. Open public hearing 4. Following public input,close public hearing PowerPoint titled Timeshares GPA 03-03, LCP 03-02, ZTA 03-03 Applicant: The Robert Mayer Corporation Date: March 21,2005 is included in the agenda packet. Recommended Action: Planning Commission and Staff Recommendation: Motion to: 1. Approve General Plan Amendment No 03-03 by adopting Resolution No. 2005-19— A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 03-03"(Attachment No. 1); and 2. Approve Zoning Text Amendment No. 03-03 with findings (Attachment No. 2) and after the City Clerk reads by title, approve for introduction Ordinance No. 3702— "An Ordinance of the City of Huntington Beach Amending the Downtown Specific Plan of the City of Huntington Beach"(Attachment No. 3); and 3. Approve Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 03-02 with findings (Attachment No. 4) and adopt Resolution No. 2005-20 —"A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Adopting Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 03-02 to Amend the Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan and Implementing Ordinances to Permit Timeshares in the Commercial Visitor Land Use Category and to Reflect Zoning Text Amendment No. 03-03 and Requesting Certification by the California Coastal Commission." (Attachment No. 5) Rosemary Medel Associate Planner gave PowerPoint presentation. Also referred to Late Communication from Chamber of Commerce supporting recommendations. Council discussion ensued. City Clerk reread Late Communication. Public Hearing opened, one applicant spoke and Public Hearing closed. Approved 5— 2 (Cook No, Sullivan No) D-2. (City Council) Public Hearing Opened and Continued Open from March 7, 2005 to Consider Appeal Filed by Applicant Mike Padian, Padian Team Consulting, of the Planning Commission's Approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08-Good Shepherd Cemetery, 8301 Talbert Avenue (N/E Corner of Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue) (420.40) (8) March 21, 2005- Council/Agency Agenda - Page 8 Public Hearing to consider appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 (Good Shepherd Cemetery). Appellant/Applicant: Mike Padian Request: To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with a proposed expansion of Good Shepherd Cemetery. The expansion includes three phases of construction over a seven to ten year period. The proposed improvements consist of an 85,000 square foot three-story mausoleum, a 10,000 square foot maintenance facility, one-story garden crypt buildings totaling 100,000 square feet, and construction of approximately 1,850 lineal feet of perimeter fencing. Location: 8301 Talbert Avenue (northeast corner of Beach Blvd. and Talbert Ave.) Environmental Status: Notice is hereby given that the initial environmental assessment for this item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that this item, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. On file: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648,for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday March 3, 2005. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk 1. Staff report 2. City Council discussion 3. Open public hearing 4. Following public input,close public hearing PowerPoint presentation titled Good Shepherd Cemetery Expansion Appeal of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 is included in the agenda packet. A communication is included in the agenda packet. Recommended Action: Motion to: A. Planning Commission Recommendation: Motion to: Approve Mitigation Negative Declaration No. 03-08 with Findings and Mitigation Measures (5:1 slopes) (Attachment No. 1); OR B. Staff Recommendation: Motion to: Approve Mitigation Negative Declaration No. 03-08 with Findings and Modified Mitigation Measures (2:1 slopes) (Attachment No. 2). (9) March 21, 2005- Council/Agency Agenda - Page 9 Associate Planner Paul DaVeiga gave overview. Discussion among Council and staff. Public Hearing opened. City Clerk announced Late Communications. Two applicants spoke and Public Hearing closed. Motion to approve staff recommendation as amended — to allow slope to begin at property line and return to Council with CUP for fence exceeding 42 inches. Approved as amended 6— 1 (Cook No) D-3. (City Council) Public Hearing to Consider Approval of Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 04-08 (Nautical North Residential Development— Rear Slope Modifications for Four Lots: 6454, 6455, 6464 and 6465 Marygale Circle (Located at the Terminus of Marygale Circle, West of Edwards Street, South of Ellis Avenue) Filed by Applicant, Fred Tinker (420.40) Applicant: Fred Tinker Request: To amend the previously approved site plan by permitting modifications to rear slopes on four lots located at the terminus of Marygale Circle. The modifications include construction of a five-foot high retaining wall topped with a one-foot block wall and two feet of view fencing in order to allow an extension of the usable rear yards ranging from approximately 12 feet to 30 feet in depth. Location: 6454, 6455, 6464, and 6465 Marygale Circle (Terminus of Marygale Circle, south of Ellis Avenue) Environmental Status: Notice is hereby given that this agenda item is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. On file: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday, March 17, 2005. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk 1_ Staff report 2. City Council discussion 3. Open public hearing 4. Following public input,close public hearing Recommended Action: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: Approve Entitlement Plan Amendment No. 04-08 to permit modifications to the rear slopes of four lots within the Nautical North development with findings and conditions of approval (Attachment No. 1). ~ ~ Esparza, Patty From* Lugar, Robin Sent Tuesday, March 22. 20053:37PK1 To: Esparza. Patty Subject: FVV: Good Shepherd Cemetery' CCAction Here are the findings and mitigation measures i Shepherd Cemetary. ��oo. Paul has indudedsuggested language for the |eMerthat informsthe app|imshtof certain direction provided by the City Council at last nights meeting. No appeal language necessary. --{)ngina| Message----- From: oaveigaPaul Sent: Tuesday, March 22'ZO053:zhPM To: Lugar,Robin Subject: Good Shepherd Cemetery CC Action On March 21, 2005 the City Council approved the appeal to modifiy Mitigatiojn Measure 1.b. to read as follows: .w/Tha design of the detention basins shall provide for earthen slopes not to exceed a 2:1 slope ratio." In addition, the City Council directed staff that in the event that the applicant would like to pursue a conditional use permit to allow perimeter fencing in excess of 42 inches in height, within the setback area along Newman Avenue, the CUP would ~\ be heard before the City Council. � | have attached the findings and mitigation measures for reference. ELJ FlNDlNGS& MD[doc Paul DoVoigo Associate Planner Department nfPlanning City of Huntington Beach Phone (714) 374'53Q4 Fax (7i4)374'1540 z (7) February 22, 2005 - Council/Agency Agenda - Page 7 2. Approve General Plan Amendment No. 04-02 by adopting Resolution No. 2005-10 — "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Approving General Plan Amendment No. 04-02 Regarding the Redesignation of Certain Real Property." (Attachment No. 3) Associate Planner Ricky Ramos presented PowerPoint report. Council inquired regarding new development, renovations of existing development, extent of zone in question, and the direction in which the City is moving with these amendments. Motion to deny Negative Declaration No. 04-02 and continue item, direct staff to make zoning consistent with General Plan. Bohr amended motion to deny Negative Declaration No. 04-02 and to instead direct staff to return to Council with a citywide solution for addressing zoning inconsistencies. Maker and second agreed to amendment. Motion to Deny Approved 7— 0. D-2 (City Council) Public Hearing to Consider Appeal Filed by Applicant Mike Padian, Padian Team Consulting, of the Planning Commission's Approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 - Good Shepherd Cemetery, 8301 Talbert Avenue (N/E Corner of Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue) (420.40) Public Hearing to consider appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 (Good Shepherd Cemetery). Appellant/Applicant: Mike Padian Request: To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with a proposed expansion of Good Shepherd Cemetery. The expansion includes three phases of construction over a seven to ten year period. The proposed improvements consist of an 85,000 square foot three-story mausoleum, a 10,000 square foot maintenance facility, one-story garden crypt buildings totaling 100,000 square feet, and construction of approximately 1,850 lineal feet of perimeter fencing. Location: 8301 Talbert Avenue (northeast corner of Beach Blvd. and Talbert Ave.) Environmental Status: Notice is hereby given that the initial environmental assessment for this item was processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that this item, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 is on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and is available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. On file: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday February 17, 2005. All interested persons are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further (8) February 22, 2005 -Council/Agency Agenda - Page 8 questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk 1. Staff report 2. City Council discussion 3. Open public hearing 4. Following public input,close public hearing PowerPoint presentation titled Good Shepherd Cemetery Expansion Appeal of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 is included in the agenda packet. Recommended Action: Motion to: A. Planning Commission Recommendation: Approve Mitigation Negative Declaration No. 03-08 with Findings and Mitigation Measures (5:1 slopes) (Attachment No. 1) OR { B. Staff Recommendation: Approve Mitigation Negative Declaration No. 03-08 with Findings and Modified Mitigation Measures (2:1 slopes) (Attachment No. 2) City Clerk read Late Communications. Motion to continue item to March 7 meeting. Approved 7— 0 D-3 (City Council) Public Hearing to Consider Whether the City Council Shall Grant a Water Pipeline Franchise to Southern California Water Company Pursuant to Resolution of Intention No. 2005-7 Adopted on January 18, 2005— Introduction of Ordinance No. 3701 —Approve Agreement Regarding Construction of a Water Pipeline (600.45) Notice is hereby given that on January 18, 2005, the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach adopted a Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Huntington Beach Declaring Its Intention To Grant a Water Pipeline Franchise to Southern California Water Company." The City Council of the City of Huntington Beach hereby gives notice as follows: On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting place of this City Council, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California, the City Council will conduct a public hearing on whether to adopt "An Ordinance Of The City Council Of The City Of Huntington Beach Granting A Pipeline Franchise For Transmitting Water In, Under, Along And Across Streets In The City Of Huntington Beach," If adopted, this ordinance will grant Southern California Water Company a water pipeline franchise to provide water service to the Bolsa Chica Mesa, pursuant to Decision No. 00-10-029 of the California Public Utilities Commission. If granted, the franchise will terminate in fifteen (15) years, and provides that Southern California Water Company will pay to the City of Huntington Beach an annual fee consistent with Section 6231(c) of the California Public Utilities Code, as amended from time to time, and that, in the event such payment is not made, the franchise may be forfeited. ell CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH � 4,-'5s MEETING DATE: February 22, 2005 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL05-07 Council/Agency Meeting Held: � � Deferre Continu dJto: .31,��D.J -3 1 0� i '4P%oved ❑ ondi onally Approved ❑ Denied City CI s S nature �. Council Meeting Date: February 22, 2005 Department ID Number: PL05-07 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH u; REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION u - o , SUBMITTED TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERSCA C_J r `r SUBMITTED BY: PENELOPE CUL�H-GRAFT, City Afii istr or PREPARED BY: HOWARD ZELEFSKY, Director of Planning SUBJECT: APPROVE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08 (Good Shepherd Cemetery -Appeal) Statement of Issue,Funding Source,Recommended Action,Alternative Action(s),Analysis, Environmental Status,Attachment(s) Statement of Issue: Transmitted for your consideration is an appeal by the applicant, Mike Padian of Padian Team Consulting, of the Planning Commission's approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08. This application analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed expansion of Good Shepherd Cemetery that includes the phased construction of a three-story mausoleum, a maintenance facility, one-story garden crypt buildings, and construction of perimeter fencing. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 00-63 covers the proposed cemetery expansion. The Planning Commission approved the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) on November 9, 2004 and continued CUP No. 00-63 to December 7, 2004. On November 19, 2004, the applicant filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the MND. The basis for the appeal is the mitigation measure that requires the on-site detention basins be designed with earthen slopes at a 5 to 1 slope ratio. There are no other mitigation measures that are being appealed by the applicant. On December 7, 2004, the Planning Commission approved CUP No. 00-63 with findings and conditions of approval. There were no appeals filed on the approval of the CUP by the Planning Commission. Planning staff recommended approval of the MND to the Planning Commission and is recommending the City Council approve the MND based on the revised mitigation measure and re-design of the detention basins. PL05-07 Good Shepherd Appeal 2 2/4/2005 8:44 AM I• REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: February 22, 2005 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL05-07 Funding Source: Not applicable. Recommended Action: A. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Approve Mitigation Negative Declaration No. 03-08 with findings and mitigation measures (5:1 slopes) (ATTACHMENT NO. 1)." MOTION PASSED Planninq Commission Action on November 9, 2004: THE MOTION MADE BY SCANDURA, SECONDED BY STILTON, TO APPROVE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08, WITH FINDINGS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (ATTACHMENT NO. 1), CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: THOMAS, SCANDURA, DAVIS, STILTON, LIVENGOOD NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: RAY, DINGWALL OR B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 with findings and modified mitigation measures (2:1 slopes) (ATTACHMENT NO. 2)." Alternative Action(s): The City Council may make the following alternative motion(s): 1. "Deny Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 with findings." 2. "Continue Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 and direct staff accordingly." Analysis: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL: Applicant: Mike Padian, Padian Team Consulting, 14 Crucillo Dr., Ste. A, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Location: 8301 Talbert Avenue (northeast corner of Beach Blvd. and Talbert Ave.) PL05-07 Good Shepherd Appeal 2/10/2005 3:24 PM REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: February 22, 2005 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL05-07 Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed expansion of Good Shepherd Cemetery. The expansion includes three phases over a seven to ten year period. The proposed improvements consist of an 85,000 square foot three-story mausoleum, a 10,000 square foot maintenance facility, one-story garden crypt buildings totaling 100,000 square feet, and construction of approximately 1,850 lineal feet of perimeter fencing (See Attachment No. 4). Please note the development project (CUP No. 00-63) approved by the Planning Commission and not appealed cannot be issued permits and constructed until such time as the project receives environmental clearance and approval of MND No. 03-08. The major issue identified in the MND is on-site drainage. Currently two natural drainage swales are located in the area of the proposed development and serve as a detention basin for storm water runoff from the subject site and upstream development. Although the proposed development will not generate a substantial increase in water runoff, the historical volume of runoff detained in the two natural drainage swales during a large storm currently exceeds the capacity of the downstream storm drain system. The existing on-site drainage pattern will be altered based on the proposed improvements and therefore is required to mitigate the potential impact. A mitigation measure was proposed to provide two on-site detention basins with earthen slopes at a ratio not to exceed 5 to 1. The final size and design of the detention basins are subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Department. B. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 9, 2004. There were five residents who spoke at the public hearing. Three of the five residents who live to the north of the cemetery expressed concerns regarding flooding that has historically occurred in their neighborhood during large storms. These residents also raised concerns regarding the aesthetics along Newman Avenue with the proposed detention basins. The other neighborhood concerns regarding the project were considered in relation to the CUP. The applicant preferred vertical concrete walls and contested the mitigation measure that required detention basins to be designed with earthen slopes at a 5 to 1 slope ratio. The applicant stated the earthen slope design would require more land on-site and reduce the land available for future internment. The Planning Commission approved Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 and continued Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63 to December 7, 2004. The MND was approved with the following mitigation measures: 1) On-site water detention basins shall be incorporated into the site design to temporarily detain runoff on the subject site. a. Historical volumes using cross-sectional areas that are perpendicular to the longitudinal (N-S) centerline of each "historical" basin shall be calculated to identify the size of on-site water detention basins. PL05-07 Good Shepherd Appeal -4= 2/4/2005 8:44 AM 3 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: February 22, 2005 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL05-07 b. The design of the detention basins shall provide for earthen slopes not to exceed a 5:1 slope ratio. 2) All easements, storm drains, and detention facilities shall be designed per City and applicable County of Orange standards and approved the Public Works Department On December 7, 2004, the Planning Commission approved the CUP with findings and conditions of approval. The CUP was not appealed. C. APPEAL: On November 19, 2004, the applicant appealed the Planning Commission's approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08. The basis for the appeal is the applicant's objection to the mitigation measure and the required design of the detention basins with a 5 to 1 earthen slope. The mitigation measure would require more land on-site and reduce the land available for future internment (see Attachment No. 5). D. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The mitigation measure is required to mitigate the potential impacts associated with the proposed expansion of the Good Shepherd Cemetery. The project includes a three-story mausoleum, a maintenance facility, garden crypt buildings and perimeter fencing .The applicant's original proposal to address the mitigation measure consisted of two detention basins with vertical concrete walls located in-line with the garden crypt buildings along Newman Avenue. The basins were surrounded by six-foot tall concrete block walls and were setback 20 feet from the northerly property line. The detention basins were approximately 206 ft. by 57 ft. and 61 ft. by 37 ft. respectively. Exhibit 1 below illustrates the original design of the detention basins: EXHIBIT 1 — Original Design (Applicant) PERIMETER WALL NEW GARDEN GRYPT5 DETENTION BASIN DETENTION BASIN P.L. 20'SETBACK NEUTAN AVENUE . .............. ............. ... a co Ll . . RVR ❑ PL05-07 Good Shepherd Appeal ,5'' 2/4/2005 8:44 AM y REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: February 22, 2005 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL05-07 The approved mitigation measure with the earthen slopes ensures that failing concrete walls, as proposed by the applicant, will not hinder future maintenance of the detention basins. The possible repair of the concrete walls could be difficult based on the location of the proposed improvements. Subsequent to appealing the MND, the applicant met with staff on December 6, 2004. Several design solutions were discussed which represented a compromise between the design criteria outlined by the mitigation measure and the vertical concrete walls that were proposed by the applicant. The applicant has revised the design of the detention basins to incorporate earthen slopes at a 2 to 1 slope ratio in an effort to comply with the mitigation measure and the engineering requirements of the City. The revised proposal consists of two detention basins in approximately the same location but at a minimum code required setback of 10 feet in lieu of the originally proposed 20 feet. The detention basins have increased in size to accommodate the 2 to 1 earthen slopes. The basins now measure approximately 197 ft. by 90 ft. and 60 ft. by 132 ft. respectively. The depth of the basins range between approximately 6.5 feet to 6.7 feet. As a result of the depths of the basins, a six-foot high wrought iron fence is required around the perimeter of the detention basins in accordance with the Uniform Building Code. The following exhibit illustrates the revised design: EXHIBIT 2 — Revised Design 6'HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCING LOCATED AT A 10-FOOT SETBACK DETENTION BASIN PROPERTY LINE DETENTION 10-FOOT SETBACK 10-FOOT SETBACK BASIN NEWMAN AVENU- mm .. .. . ... .. .. :.. .... ... .. a. T , ■. 3 The bottoms of the detention basins will be planted with ground cover and the slopes will be landscaped with ground cover, low shrubbery, and trees. As shown in Exhibit 2, a perimeter wrought iron fence surrounds the detention basins. Staff supports the revised mitigation measure based on the proposed design of the detention basins with earthen slopes. The revised mitigation measure is consistent with the findings of the MND and the CUP and will provide a compatible and aesthetic design solution consisting PL05-07 Good Shepherd Appeal �6� 2/4/2005 8:44 AM S REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION MEETING DATE: February 22, 2005 DEPARTMENT ID NUMBER: PL05-07 of wrought iron fencing and landscaping. The design will also facilitate future maintenance of these facilities while mitigating the potential impacts associated with the development project and the storm water runoff from upstream developments. The applicant also concurs with the revised mitigation measure and design. The final size and design of the detention basins will be based on a hydrology study submitted by the applicant and subject to review and approval of the City Environmental Status: The project's potential environmental impacts are analyzed under Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08. Staff determined that the proposed development, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Attachment(s): City Clerk's . - Number No. Description 1 Planning Commission - Recommended Findings and Mitigation Measures 2 Planning Department — Recommended Findings and Modified Mitigation Measures 3 Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 4 Minutes from the Nov. 9, 2004 Planning Commission Meeting 5 Planning Commission Staff Report Dated Nov. 9, 2004 6 Appeal letter from Applicant dated Nov. 19, 2004 7 1 PowerPoint Presentation RCA Author: PD/HF PL05-07 Good Shepherd Appeal .7-' 2/10/2005 2:37 PM U 1j .' N f FINDINGS MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL— MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63. 2. Mitigation measures are recommended to avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission that the project, as mitigated, will have a significant effect on the environment. (04NOA1109 MND 03-08 CUP 00-63) Summary of Mitization Measures Description of Mitigation Measure Impact Potential flooding 1) On-site water detention basins shall be incorporated into the site design to downstream caused by the temporarily detain runoff on the subject site. elimination of two natural a) Historical volumes using cross-sectional areas that are perpendicular to drainage swales with the the longitudinal (N-S) centerline of each "historical basin shall be proposed project calculated to identify the size of on-site water detention basins. b) The design of the detention basins shall provide for earthen slopes not to exceed a 5:1 slope ratio. Inadequate design of 2) All easements, storm drains, and detention facilities shall be designed per detention facilities may City and applicable County standards and approved by the Public Works result in a lack of storage Department. capacity and future maintenance issues Environmental Checklist EA 02-08 k, aj E, 3 � 3,uw FINDINGS MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL— MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. It was advertised and available for a public comment period of thirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Planning Commission prior to action on the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63. 2. Mitigation measures are recommended to avoid or reduce the project's effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment will occur. 3. There is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Planning Commission that the project, as mitigated, will have a significant effect on the environment. (04NOA1109 MND 03-08 CUP 00-63) Attachment 1.1 I -- Summary of Mitigation Measures Description of Mitigation Measure Impact Potential flooding 1) On-site water detention basins shall be incorporated into the site design to downstream caused by the temporarily detain runoff on the subject site. elimination of two natural a) Historical volumes using cross-sectional areas that are perpendicular to drainage swales with the the longitudinal (N-S) centerline of each "historical basin shall be proposed project calculated to identify the size of on-site water detention basins. b) The design of the detention basins shall provide for earthen slopes not to exceed a 2:1 slope ratio. Inadequate design of 2) All easements, storm drains, and detention facilities shall be designed per detention facilities may City and applicable County standards and approved by the Public Works result in a lack of storage Department. capacity and future maintenance issues Environmental Checklist EA 02-08 Attachment No. 1 -Page I a 5v i A ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHIE CKLIis FORM AM f CITY OF"HLTNTIN y' TON BEACH31 y IN'G 'Ep c "LANN I), AIk..MENT e ENVLR 1�1MENTAL� � S'S �S Sl�IENT NO 0 �1 ; �� N, y N: 1. PROJECT TITLE: Good Shepherd Cemetery Concurrent Entitlements: Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63/ Design Review Board No. 00-48 2. LEAD AGENCY: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Contact: Paul Da Veiga, Associate Planner Phone: (714) 536-5271 3. PROJECT LOCATION: 8301 Talbert Avenue (Northeast corner of Beach Blvd. and Talbert Avenue) PROJECT PROPONENT: Padian Team Consulting, Inc. 14 Crucillo Drive, Ste. A Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Contact: Michael Padian, Project Manager Phone: (949) 370-9778 5. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: PS (Public/Semi-Public) 6. ZONING: P (Public) 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Back r ound The subject property is approximately 35.5 acres in size and is developed with a cemetery. The current improvements on the subject property are limited to the southerly 23 acres along the Talbert Avenue and Beach Boulevard frontages. The remaining 12.5 acres are undeveloped. The cemetery is surrounded by commercial and residential uses with Walmart shopping center to the south, commercial uses to the west, and residential uses to the north and east. Vehicular access to the site is provided via a single access point on the Talbert Avenue street frontage. The Talbert street frontage is partially improved with asphalt curbs and sidewalks, and fencing consisting of sections of permanent wrought iron and split-face block pilasters. Proposed Project The applicant has requested a conditional use permit in order to develop the remaining 12.5 acres of vacant land within the project boundary. The proposed development will include an 85,000 square foot mausoleum (an enclosed multi-story crypt and internment building), a 10,000 square foot maintenance facility for housing maintenance equipment and vehicles, and garden crypt buildings totaling approximately 100,000 square feet along the perimeter of the subject site. New sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and fencing will be constructed along the Beach Boulevard, Talbert Avenue, and Newman Avenue frontages including new signage at the corner of Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue. Additional street lights are also proposed along the Talbert Avenue and Newman Avenue frontages. The onsite improvements include the installation of three new concrete detention areas to collect stormwater runoff from the subject site. The project is proposed in three phases. Phase 1 consists of construction of the maintenance facility, garden crypt building and an adjoining lawn crypt area, including installation of the loop road system. Phase 1 also includes the proposed off-site upgrades along the Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue frontages. Phase 1 will commence shortly after approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Phase 2 will include the initial phase of free-standing garden crypts, the initial mausoleum, and associated loop roads. The westerly drainage course will be completely improved, with the construction of the remainder of the concrete pipe, and the westerly-most flood detention basin. The Newman Avenue improvements will also be constructed during this phase. Phase 2 would be completed approximately three to six years from the approval date of the project. Phase 3 completes the development of the cemetery with the buildout of the mausoleum, garden crypts, and surrounding horizontal interment areas. The easterly drainage course and flood control facilities will also be constructed within this phase. Completion of Phase 3 is anticipated at approximately seven to ten years from the date of approval. 8. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SETTING: The subject property is located in a highly urbanized area. Surrounding uses to the north, south, east, and west are as follows: North: Single Family Residential South: Commercial—Walmart Shopping Center East: Multi-Family Residential West: Hospital 9. OTHER PREVIOUS RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION: None 10. OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED) (i.e. permits, financing approval, or participating agreement): CalTrans, Encroachment Permit Page 2 r� ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"or is"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use/Planning ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑x Public Services ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Utilities/Service Systems ❑ Geology/Soils ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑X Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Hazards and Hazardous Materials ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ❑ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant impact"or a"potentially significant unless mitigated impact"on the environment,but at least one impact(1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and(2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and(b)have been avoided ❑ or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Page 3 This environmental assessment summarizes the appropriate findings of the General Plan EIR, however, some impacts resulting from the proposed development will likely be"peculiar to the parcel or to the project, "therefore,this Initial Study checklist acts as a tool (to identify impacts"peculiar to the project") in conjunction with Section 21083.3 of the Public Resources Code. Based upon the results of the Initial Study checklist and the partial exemption allowed within Section 21083.3,I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATFp NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Sign ture Dat Printed Name Title EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except"No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A `No Impact"answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A"No Impact"answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact"is appropriate, if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or if the lead agency lacks information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact"entries when the determination is made,preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is warranted. 4. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigated"applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from"Potentially Significant Impact"to a"Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering,program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 c 3 D . Earlier q y Y g O( )( ) analyses are discussed in Section XVIII at the end of the checklist. 6. References to information sources for potential impacts(e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances) have been incorporated into the checklist. A source list has been provided in Section XVIII. Other sources used or individuals contacted have been cited in the respective discussions. 7. The following checklist has been formatted after Appendix G of Chapter 3, Title 14, California Code of Regulations,but has been augmented to reflect the City of Huntington Beach's requirements. (Note: Standard Code requirements-The City imposes standard code requirements on projects which are considered to be components of or modifications to the project, some of these standard conditions also result in reducing or minimizing environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. However, because they are considered part of the project,they have not been identified as mitigation measures.) Page 4 SAMPLE QUESTION: Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES(and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: Landslides? (Sources: 1, 6) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑k Discussion: The attached source list explains that I is the Huntington Beach General Plan and 6 is a topographical map of the area which show that the area is located in a flat area. (Note: This response probably would not require further explanation). Page 5 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy,or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but ❑ ❑ ❑ t✓7 not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Sources: 1 and 2) Discussion: The site is presently developed with a cemetery including direct burials,lawn crypts, and cremation niches on the southerly 23-acre portion of the subject site. The remaining 12.5 acres are undeveloped. The land use designation for the subject property is Public under the Huntington Beach General Plan allowing a maximum density factor of 1.5. The zoning on the subject property is Public Semipublic. The proposed project is consistent with the permitted uses and development standards within these designations (including setbacks,building height, and floor area ratio). No significant impacts to Land Use or Planning are anticipated. The project is consistent with the following goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan: 1. LU 13.1 — Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses, such as governmental administrative, public safety, human service, cultural, educational, infrastructure, religious, and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses 2. LU 13.1.2—Allow for the continuation of existing and development of new religious facilities in any land use zone where they are compatible with adjacent uses and subject to City review and approval. 3. LU 13.1.8—Ensure that the City's public buildings, sites, and infrastructure improvements are designed to be compatible in scale, mass, character, and architecture with existing buildings and pertinent design characteristics prescribed by this General Plan for the district or neighborhood in which they are located, and work with non-City public agencies to encourage compliance. b) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan?(Sources: 1) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: The subject site is not shown in the General Plan as a generalized habitat area, which supports plant or animal communities, nor is it within a marine habitat. The project will not conflict with any applicable habitat or natural community conservation plan as none currently exists in the City. c) Physically divide an established community? (Sources: 1, 3 and 4) ❑ ❑ ❑ RI Discussion: The subject site is located at the northeast corner of two arterial streets and is located within an established urban area;therefore, it will not divide any established communities. The project will not impact access to surrounding development. II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (e.g., through extensions of roads or other infrastructure)? (Sources: 1) Discussion: The project will not be growth inducing through construction or extension of roads or other infrastructure. The proposed use of the site is public and will cater to local residents and residents of the surrounding region as an extension of the existing cemetery use. There will be no substantial growth as a result of the proposed project. Discussion: The project will not displace any existing housing. Page 6 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact b) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 3, 4 ❑ ❑ ❑ El and 5) Discussion: The project will not result in the displacement of people since the site is currently vacant. No impacts resulting from the development are anticipated. III. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury,or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?(Sources: 1 and 9) Discussion: The project site is not located within the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or any other known earthquake faults. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?(Sources: 1 and 9) Discussion: The project may be subject to ground shaking in the event of an earthquake in the region. Structures to be constructed are required to comply with the Uniform Building Code per standard code requirements and to be built to a Seismic Zone 4 standard to address this issue. iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? (Sources: 1,9 and 16) ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Discussion: The subject site is located in an area of potential liquefaction according to the State Seismic Hazard Zones Map. The structural risks from seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, will be less than significant because the proposed buildings are designed and constructed in conformance with current standards set forth in the Uniform Building Code.No significant impacts are anticipated. iv) Landslides? (Sources: 1) ❑ ❑ ❑ C✓7 Discussion: Site stability, including impacts from landslides, should not be a concern because the project site and the surrounding areas are relatively flat. The building will be built on a level pad. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) Result in substantial soil erosion, loss of topsoil, or changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ grading,or fill? (Sources: 1 and 9) Discussion: Site preparation may result in short term wind and water erosion impacts; however, the project will be subject to standard code requirements requiring implementation of dust control measures and submittal of an erosion control plan. After completion, the site will be covered with structures, landscaping, and paving, which would preclude substantial soil erosion. Standard code requirements require the preparation of a grading plan by a registered engineer. The analysis will include on- site soil sampling and laboratory testing of materials and submission of a soils report, which will address issues regarding excavation, grading, fill, foundation and utilities. The site contains two natural drainage swales. The subject site will be re- graded. The project does not propose a substantial amount of earth moving or any other activities which result in unstable earth condition or change in geologic substructures with the exception of digging activities to construct on-site water detention basins. The proposed cut and fill activities will balance; therefore, the import/export of soil to and from the site will be Page 7 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact negligible. In the event that unstable soil conditions occur on the project site due to previous grading, excavation, or placement of fill materials, these conditions would be identified in the geotechnical study being prepared to evaluate the project site. No significant impact would occur and no mitigation measures would be required. No significant impacts are anticipated. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ potentially result in on or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? (Sources: 1 and 9) Discussion: The subject site is located in an area of low liquefaction potential according to page V-EH-15 of the City's General Plan Environmental Hazards Element and the State Seismic Hazard Zones Map. This potential impact shall be addressed through compliance with standard code requirements. However, in the event of an earthquake in the Huntington Beach area, the site may be subject to ground shaking. The UBC and associated code requirements address lateral spreading and subsidence. No significant impacts are anticipated. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(1994),creating substantial risks to life ❑ ❑ ❑ or property? (Sources: 1,and 9) Discussion: Based upon the City's General Plan and Geotechnical Inputs Study, the project site is located within an area of low to moderate clay content according to the Expansive Soil Distribution Map. This is common in the City and impacts can be addressed through compliance with applicable soils, grading and structural foundation requirements, codes and ordinances, such that any potential geologic impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance. No significant impacts are anticipated. IV. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Sources: 1,4 and Public Works Department) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: The Public Works Department recommends a standard code requirement requiring a Water Quality Management Plan to be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations in order to control the quality of water runoff and protect downstream areas. NPDES requirements assure compliance with water quality standards and water discharge requirements. The project will be designed to drain entirely into the City's storm drain system. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would ❑ ❑ Q ❑ be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? (Sources: 1 and 12) Discussion: The Water Division of the Public Works Department reviewed the project and did not indicate concerns about any substantial impacts to ground water supplies due to the nature of the proposed use. The project site does contain an active private well which is used for irrigation of the existing landscape areas within the cemetery. The project will utilize existing water lines connected to the City's water system in addition to constructing a private on-site water system for domestic and fire service to accommodate the proposed use. The proposed water use will amount to approximately 500 gallons per day. This figure does not include water used to irrigate landscaped areas which will generate from the existing, on-site private water well. Although the project will contribute to cumulative water usage in the city, it is considered insignificant since the estimated water demand for the proposed project can be accommodated by the City's water service capacity and does not Page 8 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact represent a significant increase in demand. The project will be subject to standard code requirements requiring implementation of Title 24 conservation measures such as low flow fixtures and use of drought tolerant plant species and drip irrigation. No significant impacts are anticipated to the City's groundwater supply. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream ❑ LEI ❑ ❑ or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site? (Sources: 1 and 4) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream ❑ El ❑ ❑ or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount or surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on or off-site? (Sources: 1,6& 10) e) Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Sources: 1, 3,4 and 12) Discussion: c)-e) The project will not impact the course of a stream or river, as none exist on the site. However,the existing drainage pattern of the site will be altered based on the new mausoleum buildings and private access roads proposed on the site. Currently two natural drainage swales, located in the proposed development area, serve as a detention basin for stormwater runoff water from the subject site and upstream development. Runoff flows northerly and enters the system on Newman Avenue through two storm water inlet structures. With the development of the project, approximately 10%of the site will be paved, 20% covered with buildings, and 70%will be landscaped with pervious surfaces such as turf and landscaping. Although the proposed development is not anticipated to generate a substantial increase in runoff water, the historical volume of runoff water detained in two natural drainage swales on the subject site during storm events currently exceeds the capacity of the downstream storm drain system. Based on the alteration of the drainage swale with the newly proposed development, the project is required to incorporate water detention basins into the project design. The size and design of the detention basins are subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Department. Public Works has informed the applicant that the detention basins depicted on the submitted plans are not sized adequately and shall be sized to accommodate the historical volumes currently detained on site in the two existing natural drainage swales. Furthermore, the design of the basins shall include earthen slopes not to exceed a 2:1 slope ratio in lieu of the proposed design with vertical concrete walls. The project will be subject to standard code requirements requiring submittal of grading plans and hydrology and hydraulic studies for review and approval by the Public Works Department as well as the construction of the necessary detention basins to ensure that the runoff generated by the proposed project will not further exacerbate the deficiencies in the existing downstream drainage systems and adjacent properties. The following mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the on- site drainage design: 1) On-site water detention basins shall be incorporated into the site design to temporarily detain runoff on the subject site. a) Historical volumes using cross-sectional areas that are perpendicular to the longitudinal(N-S)centerline of each "historical basin shall be calculated to identify the size of on-site water detention basins. b) The design of the detention basins shall provide for earthen slopes not to exceed a 2:1 slope ratio. 2) All easements, storm drains, and detention facilities shall be designed per City and applicable County standards and approved by the Public Works Department. With the above-mentioned mitigation measures, on-site storage of stormwater run-off water will be adequate in mitigating the loss of the drainage swales on the subject site. Impacts to the on-site drainage are considered to be less than significant with mitigation. Page 9 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (Sources: 1, 4 and Public Works Department) ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Discussion: The Public Works Department requires a Water Quality Management Plan to be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations in order to control the quality of water runoff and protect downstream areas. NPDES requirements assure compliance with water quality standards and water discharge requirements. The project will be designed to drain entirely into the City's storm drain system. g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Sources: 10) Discussion: The project site is located within Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Zone X, which is not subject to Federal Flood Development requirements and is outside the 100-year flood hazard area. The project will be subject to standard code requirements requiring Public Works Department review and approval of grading plans, soils reports, and hydrology studies prior to any activity on the site. However,no impacts are anticipated. h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Sources: 10) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: The site is not within a 100-year flood hazard area. Therefore,no impacts are anticipated. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of ❑ ❑ ❑ El the failure of a levee or dam? (Sources: 3 and 10) Discussion: The site is not in the immediate vicinity of a levee or a dam. Therefore,no impacts are anticipated. j) Inundation by seiche,tsunami, or mudflow? (Sources: I and 3) ❑ ❑ ❑ Rl Discussion: The project site is not designated in the General Plan as an area subject to tsunami run-up and is not located in proximity to areas susceptible to seiche or mudflow. Therefore,no impacts are anticipated. k) Potentially impact storm water runoff from construction ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ activities? (Sources: 1, 5 & 12) 1) Potentially impact storm water runoff from post-construction ❑ Rl ❑ ❑ activities? (Sources: 1, 5 & 12) m) Result in a potential for discharge storm water pollutants from ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 areas of material storage,vehicle or equipment fueling,vehicle or equipment maintenance(including washing),waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage,delivery areas,loading docks or other outdoor work areas? (Sources: 1, 5 & 12) n) Result in the potential for discharge or storm water to affect the ❑ ❑ ❑ 121 beneficial uses of the receiving waters? (Sources: 1, 5 & 12) o) Create or contribute significant increases in the flow velocity or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ volume of storm water runoff to cause environmental harm? (Sources: 1, 5 & 12) Page 10 eotentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact p) Create or contribute significant increases in erosion of the ❑ ❑ ❑ project site or surrounding areas?(Sources: 1, 5 & 12) Discussion: k)-p)As identified in the discussion for Section IV.c-e,the existing drainage pattern of the site will be altered based on the new mausoleum buildings and private access roads proposed on the site. Currently a natural drainage swale, located in the proposed development area, serves as a detention basin for runoff water from the subject site and upstream development. Runoff flows toward Newman Avenue to two storm water inlet structures. Although the proposed development is not anticipated to generate a substantial increase in runoff water,the historical volume of runoff water held in a natural drainage swale on the subject site during storm events currently exceeds the capacity of the downstream storm drain system. Based on the alteration of the drainage swale with the newly proposed development,the project is required to incorporate water detention basins into the project design. With the mitigation measures identified in Section IV.c-e, the impacts of run-off from the site to the existing storm drain system will be less than significant. The project will be integrated into the existing storm drain system and will be monitored and maintained by the Public Works Department. The Public Works Department recommends a standard code requirement requiring a Water Quality Management Plan to be prepared by a Civil or Environmental Engineer in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)regulations in order to control the quality of water runoff and protect downstream areas. No significant impacts are anticipated. V. AIR QUALITY. Where available,the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or ❑ ❑ Z ❑ projected air quality violation? (Sources: 11 and 12) Discussion: The project site is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD). The local air quality management agency is required to monitor air pollutant levels to assure that the air quality standards are met, and if they are not met, to develop strategies to meet the standards. The proposed project is consistent with the adopted Huntington Beach General Plan. This long-range plan has been utilized by the SCAQMD to prepare the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Project implementation does not include land use changes that would conflict with the long-range air quality projections; rather, the proposed project is consistent with the adopted General Plan and, therefore, the AQMP. The project is consistent with the intensity of development prescribed by the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The applicant will be required to implement measures to minimize pollutant emissions and to cooperate with the SCAQMD and other regional agencies that implement and enforce regional air quality management plans. Short Term: The construction of the project is proposed in three phases, over a period of 10 years. All three construction phases may result in short-term increases in dust and construction equipment emissions. The construction time within each phase is estimated at approximately 9 to 12 months. Emissions are expected from gasoline and diesel powered grading, excavating, and paving equipment. Fugitive dust generated from these activities might occur. Due to the size and scope of the grading(approximately three months in each construction phase)and general location,the dust and construction emissions are not considered significant. In order to address community concerns regarding air quality during construction, it is common to reduce any potential air quality and emissions impacts through standard code requirements. The applicant/contractor will be required to water down construction areas and vehicles, employing low sulfur vehicles, avoiding construction on high-ozone days, and decreasing activities during windy conditions. Water trucks will be utilized on the site and will be available to be used throughout the day during the site project construction. Also, wind barriers will be installed along the proposed site construction to minimize the dust during construction of the project. In addition, site premises and adjacent private and public properties will be kept free from accumulations of waste materials and rubbish. Removal of debris and dirt from public property and around project will be executed. Sidewalks and adjacent driveways and public areas will be swept promptly and daily. Minimal poor local ambient air quality may occur during site preparation and construction as a result of construction Page 11 r _ _ I votentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact equipment emission and dust, however impacts resulting from the proposed improvements are not considered significant and will be further reduced by the following: all haul trucks would be covered prior to leaving the site to prevent dust from impacting the surrounding areas. Rubbish and waste material on the project site will not be burned or buried. Cleaning and disposal operations to comply with local ordinances and anti-pollution laws will be maintained. The standard code requirements also require that the site be posted with a name and phone number of a contact person capable of handling construction complaints with regard to noise and dust control measures. The contact information will also be mailed out to surrounding property owners prior to grading and construction. No adverse impacts are anticipated with implementation of standard code requirements pertaining to dust control and compliance with AQMD requirements. Long Term: Since cemeteries are not identified in the Daily Thresholds of Potential Significance tables for air quality in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, the impacts associated with the construction of an elementary school were used to analyze potential impacts of the proposed project based on similar project size and intensity of development. According to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook the maximum daily threshold of potential significance for an elementary school is 220,000 square feet. Since an elementary school is a much more intense use from a traffic generation standpoint when compared with a cemetery, the proposed construction of a 185,000 mausoleum and a 10,000 square foot maintenance facility will not have significant air quality impacts. The Traffic Division has indicated that a project that will generate a one percent or greater increase in traffic generation on any arterial may have a significant impact on traffic circulation and will require further analysis. Vehicle trips for the project are estimated at approximately 100 trips per day and approximately 150 trips after development. The net increase in vehicle trips is negligible and will not result in an increase of over one percent to surrounding arterials;therefore,the vehicle trips generated by the proposed project are not expected to produce emissions that will significantly impact air quality. Because the scale of the project is substantially below the threshold criteria establish by the SCAQMD for potentially significant impacts, its contribution is minor in nature. No significant air quality impacts to the area are anticipated. b) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Sources:3, 11 and 12) ❑ ❑ ❑ Rl Discussion: The project site is located a significant distance away from any potentially sensitive receptors. The project is below the threshold identified by SCAQMD for projects of significance,and no impacts to sensitive receptors are anticipated. c) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Sources: 1,4, 11 and 12) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: The proposed development is an expansion of the cemetery use already existing in the area and is not anticipated to generate any unusual or objectionable odors. The development will remain subject to the air quality standards established by the SCAQMD. d) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Sources: 1, 11 and 12) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: This project is below the SCAQMD's established threshold for projects that could potentially have significant air quality impacts. As described above, the project's contribution to the cumulative air quality impact, identified by the General Plan build-out, is not considerable. e) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment ❑ ❑ EI ❑ under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (Sources: 1, 11 and 12) Page 12 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: The 195,000 square foot cemetery expansion does not constitute a cumulatively considerable increase in development in the city. According to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook the maximum daily threshold of potential significance for an elementary school is 220,000 square feet;therefore,since an elementary school is a much more intense use from a traffic generation standpoint when compared with a cemetery, the proposed construction of a 185,000 mausoleum and a 10,000 square foot maintenance facility will not result in a cumulatively considerable increase of any criteria pollutant under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. VI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (e.g., ❑ ❑ Q ❑ result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? (Sources: 1,4, 12 and 13) Discussion: The proposed development is projected to result in approximately 72 new vehicle trips/day. Access to the project is proposed via Talbert Avenue. Beach Boulevard is designated as a Major Arterial and Talbert Avenue is designated as a Primary Arterial on the Circulation Plan of Arterial Streets and Highways in the General Plan(1996). The Traffic Division of the City of Huntington Beach has indicated that acceptable levels of service (LOS) for roadway segments and intersections exist in the project vicinity. The City's General Plan considers all surrounding roadway segments and intersections acceptable. Traffic generation associated with the project is anticipated to have a negligible impact to levels of service in the area due to its small size. The project is still subject to standard code requirements including the payment of traffic impact fees to minimize any potential impacts. Construction traffic resulting from development of the project may result in short-term interruptions to traffic circulation, including pedestrian and bicycle flow. Based on the scope of the project construction, the short-term interruptions to traffic are not considered to be significant. These potential impacts may be reduced through implementation of code requirements requiring department of Public Works approval of a construction vehicle control plan. b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management ❑ ❑ ❑ C✓1 agency for designated roads or highways? (Sources: 1, 12, and 13) Discussion: As discussed above,the traffic volume projected for the development is not anticipated to affect the current level of service for area roadways. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 substantial safety risks? (Sources: 1 and 13) Discussion: The heights of the proposed structures do not penetrate the navigable airspace to impact air traffic patterns or levels for the area. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 (Sources:4) Discussion: Project access will be provided via an existing driveway off Talbert Avenue. The project access and circulation design has been reviewed by the City and is considered adequate. Page 13 i rotential ly Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Sources: 1,3 and 4) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: The project was reviewed by the Fire Department and no comments regarding emergency access problems were noted by the Fire Department. f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Sources:2 and 4) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: Approximately 65 parking spaces will be provided along the internal road system leading to the new mausoleum structures in order to accommodate visitors to the cemetery. The planned project has been designed according to City parking regulations and provides sufficient parking spaces. No impacts are anticipated to parking capacity. g) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Sources: 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 and 4) Discussion: Based on the project size and use, the development will not conflict with any policies or regulations regarding alternative transportation modes. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S,Fish and Wildlife Service? (Sources: 1) Discussion: The project site is presently vacant and located in a commercial area of the city. It does not support any unique or endangered species and is not shown in the General Plan as a generalized habitat area; therefore, no impacts to any habitat or wildlife area are anticipated. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Sources: 1) Discussion: The project does not contain any riparian habitat or sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service. The project will not result in any loss to endangered or sensitive animal or bird species and does not conflict with any habitat conservation plans. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Sources: 1) Discussion: The project does not contain any wetlands;therefore, no impacts are anticipated. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Sources: 1) Page 14 rotentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: The project is an expansion of the existing cemetery use and is surrounded by commercial development. The site does not support any fish or wildlife and should not interfere with the movement of any fish or wildlife species nor impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ordinance? (Sources: 1) Discussion: The site is currently a vacant dirt lot and does not contain any rare or unique plant species. The site does not contain any mature trees. The project will be subject to a standard code requirement requiring the submittal of a landscaping plan including standard tree requirements in the Zoning Code. Landscaping associated with the proposed project may introduce new plant species to the site; however, plant materials are expected to be common landscaping species and will be contained within the project boundaries. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or ❑ ❑ ❑ Q other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Sources: 1) Discussion: As discussed above, the project site is currently vacant. It does not support any unique or endangered plant or animal species and is not shown in any adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local,regional, or state habitat conservation plan;therefore,no impacts to any habitat or wildlife area are anticipated. VIII. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 state? (Sources: 1) Discussion: The proposed cemetery expansion will increase natural resources and energy use on this site. The project will be subject to standard conditions of approval, which require implementation of Title 24 conservation measures for construction. The new mausoleum buildings are not anticipated to deplete any non-renewable resource or require the development of new energy sources. No impacts are anticipated. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, ❑ ❑ ❑ Rl specific plan, or other land use plan? (Sources: 1) Discussion: The project site is not designated as an important mineral resource recovery site in the General Plan or any other land use plan. Development of the project is not anticipated to have any impact on any mineral resource recovery. IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 materials? (Sources: 1,4 and 5) Discussion: The proposed mausoleum buildings are designed for the interment of human remains. The applicant is not intending to operate the site in a way that would generate hazardous materials. No impacts are anticipated. Page 15 rotentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions ❑ ❑ 21 ❑ involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Sources: 1,4 and 5) Discussion: The project will be subject to regulation by the Fire Department for any possible hazardous materials. Currently, the site provides four to five 50-gallon above-ground fuel storage tanks for purposes of providing diesel fuel to machinery and maintenance vehicles on the subject site. The applicant proposes to eliminate the existing 50 gallon tanks and replace them with an above-ground 500-gallon tank for the storage and dispensing of diesel fuel oil. Only minor amounts of gasoline will be stored on-site in 10-gallon containers. These activities will be monitored and regulated by the Fire Department. The on-site storage of fuel is subject to environmental regulations. Based on the information noted above regarding the proposed uses,no significant impacts are anticipated. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous material, substances, or waste within one-quarter ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 mile of an existing or proposed school? (Sources: 1,4 and 5) Discussion: The site is surrounded by similar uses and the nearest school is approximately one half mile from the subject site therefore,no impacts are anticipated. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section ❑ ❑ ❑ 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Sources: 1,4, 15) Discussion: The site is not listed on the State's Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List. No impacts are anticipated. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public ❑ ❑ ❑ C� airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Sources: 1 and 3) Discussion: The City of Huntington Beach is included in the Orange County Airport Environs land use plan due to the Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center. However,the site is located such that it would not be impacted by flight activity from the center. No impacts are anticipated. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working ❑ ❑ ❑ ID in the project area? (Sources: 1 and 3) Discussion: The project site is not near any private airstrips. No impacts are anticipated. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 plan? (Sources: 1, 3 and 4) Discussion: The project has been reviewed by the Fire Department and is designed to be in compliance with fire access and circulation requirements. The proposed construction of the project will not involve the use of any hazardous materials and will not result in any impediments to emergency response or evacuation plans. The project site is located within the recommended five-minute response area from the Gothard Fire Station. No impacts are anticipated on any emergency response or evacuation plans. i Page 16 i c-otentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wild land fires, including where wild lands ❑ ❑ ❑ Q are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wild lands? (Sources: 1,3 and 4) Discussion: The project is located in an urbanized area and is not near any wild lands. No impacts are anticipated. X. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ❑ ❑ Q ❑ ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Sources: 1,4, 5 and 6) Discussion: During the site grading for the new building and other construction phases of the project, noise levels on the site may increase from normal construction vehicles such as concrete trucks and a backhoe as well as other equipment and tools typically used on construction sites. Construction of the project will create short-term noise impacts. However, the development will be required to comply with the City Noise Ordinance(Chapter 8.40 Noise Control),which restricts the hours of construction to reduce impacts to the area. No other significant impacts are anticipated after construction due to the nature of the use,which is compatible with the character of the area. Long-term noise impacts from the project are subject to compliance with the City Noise Ordinance as well but are not expected to be a concern due to the proposed use of the site as an expansion of an existing cemetery use. No significant long-term noise impacts resulting from the new development project are anticipated. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels?(Sources: 1 &4) ❑ ❑ Q ❑ Discussion: No significant additional ground borne vibration is anticipated given the anticipated traffic volume generated by the project which is considered negligible and does not significantly impact the level of service on area roadways. No significant impacts are anticipated. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ❑ ❑ ❑ Q (Sources: 1,4 and 5) Discussion: The type of noise to be generated by the project in the long term will be similar to that generated by the existing cemetery use and is not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ❑ ❑ Q ❑ project? (Sources: 1,4 and 5) Discussion: The project is anticipated to generate short-term noise impacts during construction. Based on a standard code requirement, which regulates hours of construction, a negligible impact is anticipated. No other significant noise impacts are expected after construction due to the nature of the project,which is compatible with other commercial uses in the area. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public ❑ ❑ ❑ Q airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Sources: 1,3 and 4) Page 17 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact Discussion: The City of Huntington Beach is included in the Orange County Airport Environs land use plan due to the Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center. However,the site is located such that it would not be impacted by flight activity from the center. No impacts are anticipated. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to ❑ ❑ ❑ Q excessive noise levels? (Sources: 1, 3 and 4) Discussion: The development is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip and will not expose people living in the residences to excessive noise levels. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? (Sources: 1 and Fire Department) ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Discussion: The Fire Department reviewed the project and indicated that it is required to comply with several code requirements and specifications. The project site is within the area of five-minute response time from the Gothard Fire Station and can be served by existing facilities. The proposed on-site fuel storage tank shall be subject to the Fire Department permits. Based on this,no impacts are anticipated. b) Police Protection? (Sources: 1 and Police Department) ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Discussion: The Police Department reviewed the project and indicated that they have no concerns that need to be mitigated. The project can be adequately served with existing Police resources. c) Schools? (Sources: 1) ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Discussion: The site is located approximately one-half mile from the nearest school and will not result in substantial adverse physical impacts. Payment of school impact fees will be required prior to issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated based on the location of site and nature of the use. d) Parks? (Sources: I) ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Discussion: The project is not expected to have impacts to park facilities based on the location of the site with surrounding commercial and residential uses,nor result in additional demand on existing park facilities. e) Other public facilities or governmental services? (Sources: 1) ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Discussion: The project is located within a developed urban environment and all facilities needed to service it are already in place. The project has been reviewed by the various City Departments, including Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire, Police, and Planning for compliance with all applicable City codes. With compliance of standards code requirements, and compliance with City specifications,no significant adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Page 18 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (Sources: 1 and 3) ❑ ❑ Rl ❑ Discussion: As indicated under section IV (a), a standard code requirement addresses wastewater quality issues. No significant impacts are expected. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing ❑ ❑ El ❑ facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1 and 3) Discussion: The project is not expected to result in the construction of new or significant expansion of existing water or wastewater treatment facilities. The project will likely require extensions of public services and utilities to the site provided by the respective governmental agencies and utility companies. All public utility connections to the project will be in accordance with all applicable Uniform Building Codes, City ordinances, Public Works standards, and Water Division criteria. The project is subject to standard code requirements,therefore no adverse impacts to the City's utilities or services are anticipated. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the ❑ ❑ ❑ construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: I and 3) Discussion: The proposed project will not contribute to significant increases in storm water runoff to off-site facilities or result in erosion of the site or surrounding areas if the required detention facilities are constructed prior to the removal of the existing on-site drainage swales/detention basins. However, the existing drainage pattern of the site will be altered based on the new mausoleum buildings and private access roads proposed on the site. Currently two natural drainage swales, located in the proposed development area, serve as a detention basin for stormwater runoff water from the subject site and upstream development. Runoff flows northerly and enters the system on Newman Avenue through two storm water inlet structures. With the development of the project, approximately 10%of the site will be paved, 20%covered with buildings, and 70%will be landscaped with pervious surfaces such as turf and landscaping. It is not located in the vicinity of and does not drain directly into any natural body of water. Although the proposed development is not anticipated to generate a substantial increase in runoff water, the historical volume of runoff water detained in two natural drainage swales on the subject site during storm events currently exceeds the capacity of the downstream storm drain system. Based on the alteration of the drainage swale with the newly proposed development, the project is required to incorporate water detention basins into the project design. The size and design of the detention basins are subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Department. Public Works has informed the applicant that the detention basins depicted on the submitted plans are not sized adequately and shall be sized to accommodate the historical volumes currently detained on site in the two existing natural drainage swales. Furthermore,the design of the basins shall include earthen slopes not to exceed a 2:1 slope ratio in lieu of the proposed design with vertical concrete walls. The project will be subject to standard code requirements requiring submittal of grading plans and hydrology and hydraulic studies for review and approval by the Public Works Department as well as the construction of the necessary detention basins to ensure that the runoff generated by the proposed project will not further exacerbate the deficiencies in the existing downstream drainage systems and adjacent properties. The following mitigation measures shall be incorporated into the on- site drainage design: 1) On-site water detention basins shall be incorporated into the site design to temporarily detain runoff on the subject site. a) Historical volumes using cross-sectional areas that are perpendicular to the longitudinal(N-S)centerline of each "historical basin shall be calculated to identify the size of on-site water detention basins. b) The design of the detention basins shall provide for earthen slopes not to exceed a 2:1 slope ratio. 2) All easements, storm drains, and detention facilities shall be designed per City and applicable County standards and approved by the Public Works Department. Page 19 rotentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact With the above-mentioned mitigation measures, on-site storage of stormwaterrun-off water will be adequate in mitigating the loss of the drainage swales on the subject site. Impacts to stormwater drainage facilities are considered to be less than significant with mitigation. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ expanded entitlements needed? (Sources: 1 and 3) Discussion: The proposed project would result in a minimal increase in public water usage on the subject site based on the proposed expansion of an existing cemetery use. The applicant has indicated that the average water usage would amount to 500 gallons per day. This figure does not include irrigation of the site, which is accommodated by an on-site private water well. The project is expected to have a negligible impact on water supplies. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (Sources: 1 and 3) Discussion: The proposed project would result in a minimal increase in wastewater on the subject site based on the addition of restroom facilities,however,the proposed use is expected to have a negligible impact on wastewater treatment capacity. f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (Sources: 1 and 3) Discussion: The project is not expected to generate a significant amount of solid waste. The nearest landfill is the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill located in the City of Irvine. The landfill has a remaining capacity in excess of 30 years based on the present solid waste generation rates. The project is not anticipated to noticeably impact the capacity of existing landfills that will serve the use. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (Sources: 1 and 3) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: The project will be served by Rainbow Disposal and will be subject to participation in any solid waste reduction programs presently available in the city. XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Sources: 1, 3 and 4) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: The project is located in an established mixed use area. It is not located adjacent to a state scenic highway nor is it in an area with any scenic vistas. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 within a state scenic highway? (Sources: 1, 3 and 4) Discussion: The site is presently vacant. It does not contain any scenic resources such as rock outcroppings or historic buildings. No adverse aesthetic impacts are anticipated. Page 20 rotential ly Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Sources: 1,2, 3 and 4) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: The proposed building will be designed and constructed of similar colors, materials, and scale found in the surrounding development. This includes the same color pallet and similar mass and height of the other structures in the project area. The project will incorporate modern architectural design and should be an enhancement to the aesthetics of the area. No negative impacts to aesthetics are anticipated with the proposed development. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Sources: ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 4, 17) Discussion: Lighting will be included throughout the project but will be in character with lighting found within the existing cemetery. The project will be subject to a condition of approval that requires lighting to be shielded and directed so as to prevent glare and spillage onto adjacent properties. Although the project will result in an increase in light, the additional lighting in the community is considered negligible as the area is already developed. XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 515064.5? (Sources: 7 and ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 12) Discussion: The subject site is currently undeveloped and does not contain any historic structures and is not located within any of the City's historic districts. No historical resource will be impacted by the construction of the project. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 515064.5? (Sources: 8 and ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 12) Discussion: The subject site is not located in an identified archaeological site;therefore,no impacts are anticipated. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site unique geologic feature? (Sources: I and 8) ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion: The site is a vacant dirt lot. It does not contain any unique geologic features. It is not designated as having any paleontological resources. No impacts are anticipated. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Sources: 8) ❑ ❑ ❑ El Discussion: The existing burials will not be affected by the cemetery expansion. Based on the discussion under item XIV(b), the project is not expected to result in the disturbance of human remains. XV. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood, community and regional parks or other recreational facilities ❑ ❑ ❑ Q such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Sources: 3 and 4) Discussion: Although employees of the proposed use may visit existing park facilities, no significant increase in the use of existing neighborhood, community and regional parks or recreational facilities is anticipated based on the small number of employees proposed. No impacts are anticipated. Page 21 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Sources: 1,3 and 4) Discussion: The project will not require the construction or expansion of new or existing recreational facilities. The proposed use is for the expansion of an existing cemetery,therefore, no adverse impacts to recreational facilities are anticipated. c) Affect existing recreational opportunities?(Sources: 3 and 4) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: Although employees of the proposed use may visit existing recreational facilities, no significant increase in the use of these facilities is anticipated based on the small size of the project. No impacts are anticipated. XVI. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? (Sources: 1 and 3) Discussion: The subject site is currently vacant and surrounded by commercial and residential uses, and does not contain any farming operations. Development of this project will not result in the conversion of any farmland. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Sources: 1 and 3) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: The subject site is presently zoned PS(Public-Semipublic)which does not permit agricultural uses. Development of the site will not conflict with agricultural use and zoning as none exist nor are permitted on the site. c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Farmland,to non-agricultural use? (Sources: 1 and 3) Discussion: The site is presently vacant and is surrounded by commercial and residential uses. Therefore, the development will not result in the loss of any farmland. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a Page 22 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ISSUES (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Sources: 1,3,4, 5 and 7) Discussion: The project site is currently vacant. It is not located within any wildlife or biological resource area and therefore will not impact any fish, wildlife, or plant community. The site does not contain any historic resource. Based on discussions in Sections I to XVI above,the project is anticipated to have no impact on the quality of the environment. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) (Sources: 1,3,4, 5 and 12) Discussion: As discussed above in Sections I to XVI, the project is not anticipated to have any individual and cumulative impacts based on the limited increase of vehicle trips (72) and use which is an expansion of an existing cemetery that will result in negligible impacts to surrounding properties. c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ indirectly? (Sources: 1, 3,4, 5 and 12) Discussion: As discussed above in Sections I to XVI, the project as proposed and with implementation of the recommended code requirements will have a less than significant impact on human beings,either directly or indirectly. Page 23 XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSIS. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to tiering,program FIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c)(3)(D). Earlier Documents Prepared and Utilized in this Analysis: Reference# Document Title Available for Review at: 1 City of Huntington Beach General Plan and EIR City of Huntington Beach Planning Dept., Zoning Information Counter, 3rd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 2 City of Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance " 3 Summary of Mitigation Measures See Attachment#1 4 Project Vicinity Map See Attachment#1 5 Reduced Site Plan,Floor Plans, Elevations See Attachment#2 6 Project Narrative See Attachment#3 7 City of Huntington Beach Municipal Code City of Huntington Beach City Clerk's Office 2000 Main Street, 2"d floor Huntington Beach 8 City of Huntington Beach Historic District Map City of Huntington Beach Planning Dept., Zoning Information Counter, 3rd Floor 2000 Main St. Huntington Beach 9 City of Huntington Beach Archaeological Site Vicinity Map " 10 City of Huntington Beach Geotechnical Inputs Report " 11 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map(June 14,2000) " 12 CEQA Air Quality Handbook " South Coast Air Quality Management District(1993) 13 City of Huntington Beach CEQA Procedure Handbook " 14 Trip Generation Handbook, 5°i Edition,Institute of Traffic Engineers " 15 Orange County Airport Environs Land Use Plan (Nov. 16, 1995) " 16 Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List " 17 State Seismic Hazard Zones Map " Summary of Mitigation Measures Description of Mitigation Measure Impact Potential flooding 1) On-site water detention basins shall be incorporated into the site design to downstream caused by the temporarily detain runoff on the subject site. elimination of two natural a) Historical volumes using cross-sectional areas that are perpendicular to drainage swales with the the longitudinal (N-S) centerline of each "historical basin shall be proposed project calculated to identify the size of on-site water detention basins. b) The design of the detention basins shall provide for earthen slopes not to exceed a 2:1 slope ratio. Inadequate design of 2) All easements, storm drains, and detention facilities shall be designed per detention facilities may City and applicable County standards and approved by the Public Works result in a lack of storage Department. capacity and future maintenance issues Environmental Checklist EA 02-08 Attachment No. 1 -Page I ATTACHMENT 4 PC Minutes DRAFT November 9,2005 Page 7 Vice Chair Ray made reference to Area C on Attachment No. 4.12 and discussion ensued with staff about the term "mixed vertical" (commercial on the ground floor and residential above) and how the Lowe's project changes the area to commercial. Vice Chair Ray voiced approval. Staff discussed mixed use being used for 10-15 acre parcels, and explained that requests involving smaller parcels do require a coordinated development plan. Staff explained uniform regulations throughout each district and also discussed how zoning maintains property values and character. Commissioner Dingwall discussed how the request assists residential owners that are locked out of making improvements and how this request will not hurt auto dealerships. Commissioner Stilton explained how the request only makes consistent the current zoning identified in the Huntington Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance with the General Plan. THE MOTION WAS ACTED ON BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Thomas, Scandura, Ray, Stilton, Livengood, Dingwall NOES: Davis ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION APPROVED B-2. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-63 (GOOD SHEPHERD CEMETERY EXPANSION): Applicant: Padian Team Consulting Property Owner: Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange Request: MND: To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed project. CUP: 1) To permit the three-phase expansion of the existing 23 acre cemetery. The phased improvements include the construction of an approximately 85,000 square foot, three-story mausoleum, an approximately 10,000 square foot maintenance facility, and above-ground garden crypts totaling approximately 100,000 square feet on 12.5 undeveloped acres adjacent to the existing cemetery. 2) To permit approximately 980 lineal feet of six-foot tall decorative block walls and view fencing at a zero setback along the Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue frontages. Location: 8301 Talbert Avenue (North side of Talbert Avenue, east of Beach Boulevard). Project Planner: Paul Da Veiga STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Motion to: "Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 with findings and mitigation measures;" and, "Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63 with findings, modifications and conditions of approval." The Commission made the following disclosures: Vice Chair Ray and Commissioner Dingwall excused themselves from action on the item due to possible conflicts of interest; Commissioner Thomas visited the site; Commissioner Scandura visited the site and spoke with staff; Commissioner Stilton visited the site; Commissioner Livengood visited the site and disclosed that he owns a plot for future internment. (04pcm1109) PC Minutes DRAFT November 9,2005 Page 8 Paul Da Veiga, Associate Planner, provided a staff report and PowerPoint presentation to the Commission. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED: Chrysteen Bandy, Board Secretary for the Tamarack Village Homeowners Association (TVHOA), spoke in support of the proposed lighting but voiced concerns about the proposed vinyl fencing, criminal activity, vagrancy, and the 10 foot setback between their property line and the crypt building. She also voiced opposition to the 3-story building and discussed how their front doors face the cemetery fence. Mindy Belli, Huntington Beach, discussed the property's north/south border along the Tamarack Village and voiced concerns about fencing and a 10-foot setback. She discussed how the area collects bad traffic, including trespassers coming over the fence at the northwest corner of Tamarack Village. She stated that safety issues in the 10-foot setback must be addressed through proper lighting and maintenance. She also discussed the nature of the gate at the end of alleyway, and whether groundcover was being considered. Gordon Doull, Residents — RD283, voiced concerns that existing water runoff problems and not being adequately addressed in the report, including water basins not being able to maintain proper capacity because of problems that exist downstream. He discussed Districts 2 and 3 having no tract access to the east and south, creating a pocket that could attract undesirables and encourage criminal activity. He also discussed the 20-foot Newman Avenue setback and the use of trees and shrubs that could provide housing to vagrants and prohibit vehicular access by police. He stated support for wrought iron fencing. Ron Cowper, Huntington Beach, stated that certain exhibits do not correctly depict the area they represent. He described the mausoleum as prison-like and dilapidated. He discussed the public notification process and the 300 feet radius requirement. He voiced concerns about aesthetics, wall height, and connecting a 54" drainpipe into a 48" drainpipe. He described flooding in recent years that caused water to rise up to the front doors of residents on Newman Avenue. Joe Novoa, Diocese of Orange, identified his associates and discussed a neighborhood meeting held to address concerns by residents about lighting, landscaping, Police accessibility, and neighborhood flooding due to the absence of a capable drainage system downstream. He explained that a large volume of public water travels through their property that lies between 2 drainage areas, suggesting the need for a comprehensive master plan to upgrade the property and improve runoff conditions. He discussed landscaping and setback enhancements and stated that the project is committed to enhancing the infrastructure, irrigation, current slopes, and mitigation of issues related to drainage and runoff. Discussion ensued about standard city code requirements. Mr. Novoa addressed concerns related to noise by referencing fencing and solid block wall information provided on page 3 of the staff report. He also requested that public improvements along Newman Avenue be completed within the second (04pcm1109) PC Minutes DRAFT November 9, 2005 Page 9 phase of the project because of unfeasible costs estimated at $3 million dollars. He finalized his comments by referencing staff's opposition to the three-part phasing plan identified on page 11 and the associated financial impacts related to grading and construction of detention basins. Mike Padian, applicant, addressed the concerns related to possible flooding on the property and the re-design of the nature of detention basins. He discussed Public Works suggestion for compliance with the sloped basin design for water drainage, City liability issues, the City's annual schedule for maintaining the channels, and basins not depicted in the City's master plan of drainage. He also voiced concerns with taking property away for City drainage issues. Commissioner Scandura made reference to an informational discrepancy related to phase one activity on attachment 3.15 and the conditions of approval listed on page 5 of the staff report. Mr. Padian discussed drainage improvements projected in the first phase, including making detention basins slightly bigger by using larger drainpipe, depicted on Attachment 2.1, CUP Site Plan Phases 1, 2 and 3. Irwin Fishbein, Huntington Beach, provided a history of activity related to the existing storm basin backing up and causing flooding to area neighbors. He described how his property has been flooded 3 times in 25 years, and that boats were required to access neighbors front doors that were submerged in 3 feet of water. He called the situation urgent and recommended that an expedient remedy for drainage be initiated. WITH NO ONE ELSE PRESENT TO SPEAK, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Scandura commented on the differences in drainage and the applicant's proposal to install pipes in certain areas but not throughout the property. Commissioner Stilton questioned the applicant's choice for phase 1 improvements proposing the walls along Newman Avenue, and the corner of Beach Blvd. and Talbert Avenue. The applicant suggested swapping Newman Avenue improvements for the Beach/Talbert improvements. Commissioner Thomas asked if it was common for the City to require an applicant to complete improvements like detention basins within the first phase of a project. Staff responded that it is common to condition necessary public improvements within the first phase on projects with a phasing plan, and given the drainage issues that impact the residents to the north of the site, the condition is appropriate. Commissioner Scandura asked about the vinyl fencing near Tamarack Village. Staff replied that the Tamarack Village Homeowners Association (TVHOA) is responsible for maintaining the vinyl fence, and suggested that the Commission consider a condition that prohibits double fencing. (04pcm1109) PC Minutes DRAFT November 9,2005 Page 10 Commissioner Scandura asked how the applicant would control vagrant and graffiti activity. Staff responded that security patrols will be made 4 times per evening and reported graffiti would be removed within a 24-hour period. Commissioner Scandura asked what type of storm event the proposed detention basins would control in the final phase would control. Staff responded that the improvements would maintain the current level of detention and not accentuate the condition. Commissioner Scandura asked if the cemetery is responsible for the floods experienced by area neighbors. Staff responded that the cemetery is not the reason for the floods in the area, but rather it is a combination of things. Staff discussed the vertical concrete walls requested by applicant and staff's recommendation for earthed sloped areas to prevent slope deterioration. Commissioner Scandura stated that he had difficulty contacting cemetery officials and requested that a condition of approval be added that provides a public contact number. He asked that the vegetation in bermed areas be clearly identified, reminding the applicant that the Environmental Board requires native, drought-tolerant plants. He voiced concerns about the height of garden crypts along Newman Avenue, and massing issues associated with the mausoleum height. Commissioner Stilton asked if staff received reports related to criminal activity on the property. Staff replied that code enforcement has received calls about people trespassing, but none from the Police Department. Commissioner Stilton voiced concerns about massing of the mausoleum and height of the garden crypts. She asked if the applicant considered the scale of adjacent businesses when designing the project, and whether or not it was possible to relocate the 3-story building. She also voiced concerns about insufficient landscaping and lighting to mitigate vagrancy, discussed how drainage issues may have dictated design, and how the request hasn't appropriately addressed neighborhood concerns. Commissioner Livengood asked how much property it would take to create sloped basins that would accommodate the storm water. Staff responded that they were waiting for a final proposal from the applicant before an exact area could be determined. Commissioner Livengood asked if the City is responsible for replacing the 32- inch drainpipe. Terri Elliott, Public Works, responded that channels downstream are not sized properly to accommodate a large volume of water, and that a detention basin must be included. Staff also discussed existing drainage channels identified on past maps. Chair Davis asked if the issue is inadequate downstream capacity. Staff confirmed, stating that the City provides a recommendation based an analysis of the worst-case scenarios and then determining what level of improvements are necessary. Staff also explained that the adjacent Wal-Mart development is conditioned to retain storm water flow (underground pipes, detention basins, etc.) in order to maintain current water flow conditions. (04pcm1109) PC Minutes DRAFT November 9,2005 Page 11 Chair Davis asked what is involved, including costs, to fix the problems that exist downstream. Staff responded that a number of issues exist, most importantly improperly sized channels constructed by the County prior to 1996. Staff also explained how detention basins operate to store water. Commissioner Livengood voiced concerns about the sidewalk/curb/gutter on the south side of Talbert Avenue being ADA compliant. He stated that modifying the sidewalk and adjacent improvements would be cost prohibitive, and asked for a recommendation by Public Works. Public Works staff distributed photos that identified sidewalk width and their relationship to the streetlights and other right- of-way improvements. Discussion ensued on the process of involving the DRB in area modification. Commissioner Livengood discussed Attachment 3 and the applicants phasing for the CUP. He asked if the detention basin identified within the first phase was temporary. Staff confirmed that the detention basin was temporary until the issues identified downstream were corrected. Commissioner Livengood discussed staff's acceptance of the applicant's wall proposal for Newman Avenue, and staff's recommendation for view fencing at the Beach/Talbert location. Staff described wall and landscape design along Newman Avenue. Staff also stated that view fencing was recommended at Beach Blvd. and Talbert Avenue because of zero setback issues, adding that it also softens the overall appearance. Commissioner Livengood asked the applicant if block wall fencing would better deter vagrants. Mike Padian discussed topography and fencing in between crypt buildings along Newman Avenue and that the detention basin in front of the mausoleum is heavily screened. Commissioner Livengood asked if the crypts are considered part of the wall. Mr. Padian discussed the wall materials and crypt construction. Commissioner Thomas asked if the proposed crypt design provided an improvement to the stark-like appearance that currently exists. Mr. Padian responded that the proposed design would not be a flat wall. Discussion ensued about the zero setbacks along Beach Blvd. and landscaping. Commissioner Thomas asked if the fence along the garden crypt on Talbert Avenue could be set back to align with the mausoleum. Staff responded that moving existing gravesites pose serious problems. Staff stated that the wall could not be set back enough to provide adequate landscaping and that is why staff recommends view fencing. Joe Truxaw, the applicant's consultant, discussed street access and ADA compliance on Talbert Avenue. He also discussed moving the existing curb line 2 feet into Talbert Avenue to provided for a 6-foot wide sidewalk, explained that the existing gravesites abut at a zero setback line and encroaching into the street will not prohibit the right turn onto Beach Blvd. Staff responded that the City does not recommend reducing the right-of-way for Talbert Avenue to provide a 6-foot sidewalk. Commissioner Thomas asked if the properties lighting is shielded away from the adjacent residents. Staff confirmed. (04pcm1109) PC Minutes November 9,2005 DRAFT Page 12 Commissioner Scandura recommended adding 4 new conditions for discussion including keeping the applicant's proposal for drainage, looking at garden crypt and mausoleum heights, considering a maximum height of 30 to 35 feet, redesigning the garden crypts along Newman Avenue, and moving the crypt wall and flush with the existing mausoleum. Commissioner Stilton stated that the applicant did not provide enough information asking if it were possible for the applicant to present material to the Design Review Board (DRB) in order to consider Urban Design Guideline elements, etc. Staff referred to the mandatory processing time identified on page 8 of the staff report, and explained that the Commission could act on Mitigated Negative Declaration. Staff added that based on the comments related to design, staff recommends that the Commission receive input from the DRB. Staff asked Commission Counsel if a 45-day extension of the CUP would be in compliance with CEQA guidelines. Commission Counsel stated that the applicant would have to concur. Discussion ensued about possible meeting dates for the DRB. A MOTION WAS MADE BY SCANDURA, SECONDED BY STILTON, TO APPROVE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08 WITH FINDINGS AND MITIGATIONS MEASURES, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Thomas, Scandura, Davis, Stilton, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Ray, Dingwall MOTION APPROVED Staff recommended the Commission identify what they wish to see at the next meeting, adding that the applicant had met the code requirements. Staff also reminded the Commission that public improvement requirements are regulated by code and the Public Works Department. Commissioner Livengood asked for an appropriate solution to widening the sidewalk on the north side of Talbert Avenue. Staff reminded the Commission that the street/curb/gutter/sidewalk design was part of the WalMart project and again referenced the photos distributed. Staff also stated that the existing utility pole would be relocated underground, and that the signal poles comply with Title 24 requirements. Commissioner Livengood asked for the sidewalk width in commercial areas. Staff replied that the sidewalk on Talbert Avenue is 8 feet and explained that due to gravesite location along the north side of Talbert Avenue, a 10-foot dedication would not be possible. Staff said that the existing sidewalk could be modified to meet ADA requirements. Commissioner Thomas asked if the fence could be moved inward at the corner of Beach Blvd. and Talbert Avenue. Commissioner Scandura said he believed that 15 feet existed between the fence and gravesites. Mr. Padian explained that (04pcm 1109) PC Minutes )KI"A F T November 9,2005 Page 13 lawn crypts must be measured and the width must be established for the area behind the fence, but that they would prefer a block wall in that area to inhibit noise and allow visitors to mourn. Staff stated that such a request would be subject to further review. Staff also recommended seeking a recommendation from the DRB for walls and landscaping. Commissioner Scandura questioned how much time would be necessary to allow the applicant to address height and sidewalk issues. Chair Davis responded that the applicant has met all zoning requirements and staff repeated that if the Commission decides to continue the item, clear direction must be given on what specific items the Commission is asking staff and the applicant to address. THE COMMISSION TOOK A RECESSED AT 10:00 P.M. AND RESUMED AT 10:07 P.M. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY THOMAS, TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-63 TO A SPECIAL MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2004, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Thomas, Scandura, Davis, Stilton, Livengood NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Ray, Dingwall MOTION APPROVED A SUBSTITUTE MOTION WAS MADE BY DAVIS, SECONDED BY THOMAS, TO APPROVE STAFFS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-63, AND FORWARD DESIGN ELEMENTS (BUILDING SIZE/MASSING) TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. Commissioner Thomas asked if it were possible for the DRB to provide a recommendation on downsizing the garden crypts or mausoleum. Staff responded that there isn't enough time to get a DRB meeting scheduled to review the proposal prior to the next meeting. The applicant explained the overall crypt height, articulation, and design proposed to address the mass of the building and to soften the appearance of the Newman Avenue frontage. Commissioner Scandura suggested modifying the grade, downsizing the proposal to 5 crypts, and reducing the mausoleum height by 15 feet. Commissioner Stilton requested that the Commission give the applicant precise direction. She also expressed concerns with the long, linear design of the crypts and the 10-foot setback along the easterly side of the project adjacent to the existing residential development. COMMISSIONER THOMAS WITHDREW HER SECOND TO THE SUBSTITUTE MOTION MADE BY CHAIR DAVIS. Commissioner Scandura restated his proposal to reduce the mausoleum height by 15 feet. He also recommended reducing garden crypt height by 3 to 6 feet, (04pcm 1109) PC Minutes DRAFT November 9,2005 Page 14 creating view corridors on the east side of the project, widening the sidewalk width at Beach Blvd. and Talbert Avenue, and providing view fencing versus a solid wall at Beach Blvd. and Talbert Avenue. Commissioner Stilton stated that height issues could be addressed during design review. Commissioner Scandura stated that if the slope/grade causes increased building height, then a two-story structure can be considered. Commissioner Livengood stated that the projects phasing plan needs to be studied, adding a request that 1 to 2 feet be added to the sidewalk on the north side of Talbert Avenue for increased width. Commissioner Scandura proposed conditions of approval to address the Tamarack Village fence issues, advertising a public contact number for the cemetery, using California native/drought tolerant landscaping, prohibiting use of bushes and shrubs that may provide visual cover to vagrants, and to leave the applicant's phasing plan as is. Discussion ensued about continuing the item to December 7, 2004. A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY THOMAS, TO CONTINUE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-63 TO A SPECIAL MEETNG HELD ON DECEMBER 7, 2004 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Thomas, Scandura, Ray, Davis, Stilton, Livengood, Dingwall NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION APPROVED C. CONSENT CALENDAR C-1. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2004 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to: "Approve the September 14, 2004 Planning Commission Minutes as submitted." A MOTION WAS MADE BY LIVENGOOD, SECONDED BY THOMAS, TO APPROVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2004, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Thomas, Scandura, Ray, Davis, Stilton, Livengood, Dingwall NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MOTION APPROVED (04pcm1109) ATTACHMENT 5 City of Huntington Beach Planning Departmenf STAFF REPORT` NJNiVtGTON 6E 401 ... TO: Plannin-, Commission FROINI: Howard Zelefsky, Director of Planni t BY: Paul Da Veiga, Associate Plam DATE: November 9. 2004 SUBJECT: MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 00-63 (Good Shepherd Cemetery Expansion) APPLICANT: Mike Padian, Padian Team Consulting, 14 Crucillo Dr., Ste. A, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 PROPERTY OWNER: Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange, P.O. Box 14195, 281 1 E. Villa Real Dr., Orange CA 92863 LOCATION: 8301 Talbert Ave. (Northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and "Talbert Avenue) • Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-05/ -• Analyze the potential impacts of the three-phase expansion to tiie existing 23-acre cemetery site. Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63 request: - ConStrUction of an 85,000 square foot•, three-story mausoleum, a 10,000 square foot maintenance facility, and one-story !garden crypt buildings totaling 100,000 square feet. - Six-foot tall decorative block walls/wrought iron fencing at a zero setback along the Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue frontages. Staffs Recommendation: Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08/Conditional.Use Permit No. 00-63 with modifications based upon the following: The proposed development is consistent with the- General Plan designation of Public on the subject site. - The project complies with all development standards identified in the Huntington. Beach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. - The proposed development is consistent with the existinu cemetery use and can be integrated and be sensitive to the surroundino land uses with adequate setbacks, landscaping, and design amenities. - The project will not be detrimental to the general health. welfare and safety to persons workin<, or living in the area, nor detrimental to the value of the property or improvements in the area. L_ ' �ENT a t 8 8 MCf 1 (SlTL FD1KF3 I �Q. WARYCM \ \ sz-.,m Y.. TAIJ W \ \• Da ♦ _ t1LB uS 8 \ GAl►IZtil ' —��AX"* MIAMAYOUS j?IS I W r `y�G;{, ! IjY HAMMMN z 1S M o-+ NANNQIC r a 7J,*, f y� � �rit��Ui=1�r�'�,t� "€ `� �� ^�T7 "'v p.y4►� � � 5a ��a� Tyt`g tfi fij,r S'UiUECT S1.TF `�• J `y,`x 4.t •�, . to iK Z t sr`p I I a n e�',y z'sa�^'$I�' '>'s•'' Ft jfi}i '{"F{'4 `41 .t �" �+if'riu�� x+T � z�g ty'n`*�i*� �•�.?\a.clk...�{,�:i �- x • r V irk S �i' ,�""''�"�T. 'r�*X.ti 3P�I•+..' � ��`�_R �►�`q +�`i1 t� � �) r •' rx r,c,.py�,'s�y`w° fr`�i • *'ram ,r s"#}3 ',+� �� ""n "Y"`2n, �'f•illlr t".i t+ > ,.�" "'" .� ,� {gt t ;l�fl9'��1 � 'S� . .6'gS 9 c h• �� r � a�,�� 7�7 ��. �� a c.,ra:'`7t--2.5_�w'.a.iY'`?.�-r25:taf '• �.t�.k,�. ,'r�.�`�.�"�.�*.�.yc=�'3�f a•:�► i: r VICINITY MAP Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08/Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63 8301 Talbert Avenue THE CITY OR HUNTINGTON BEACH PC Staff Report— 1 1/09/04 -2- (04sr29) e...,h��x� B '4 Ati;r x e.,...,.,»...—.•,.....—.» Staffs Suaeested Modifications: Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63 - All new fencing along the Beach Blvd. and Talbert Ave. frontages shall be composed of wrought iron view fencing with split face block pilasters at measured at?0 feet on center. The design. color, and materials of new fencina shall be consistent with existing view fencing alone the Talbert Avenue fronta,,e. - Security liolltim, shall be installed at the rear of the garden crypt buildings adjacent to the easterly property line. (Lightin�p. shall be shielded so as to not spill onto adjacent residential properties Code Requirement] - The existing mausoleum along Talbert Ave. shall incorporate architectural enhancements on the south elevation facing Talbert Ave. - Public improvements along Newman Avenue shall be completed within the first phase of development. - Fnhanced landscaping shall be provided within the twenty-foot setback along the Newman Avenue frontage in order to deter graffiti. Landscaping will consist of climbing vines on perimeter walls, ground cover, shrubs, and trees. RECOMMENDA11ON: Motion to: A. "Approve. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 with findings and mitigation measures (Attachment No. 4) " 13. "Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63 with suggested findings, modifications, and conditions of approval (Attachment No.I)" A117'ERNA'I'1VE AC7'ION(:S): The Planning Commission may take alternative actions Such as: A. "Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63 «-ith findings for denial." I3. "Continue Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63 and direct staff accordingly." PROTECT PROPOSAL: i\,Iitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 was prepared pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed cemetery expansion. The study concludes that the project will not result in significant environmental impacts with the proposed mitigation measures. PC Staff Report— 1 1/09/04 -3- (04sr39) F�y rS Conditional Use Permit No. 01-20 represents a request for the following_: A. Phased construction of an 85,000.square foot, three-stony mausoleum, a 10,000 square foot maintenance facility. and one-story garden crept buildings totaling 100.000 square feet pursuant to Section 214.06 PS District — I-and Use Controls of the HBZS0; and B. Six-toot tall decorative block walls/view fencing at a zero setback in lieu often feet along the Beach Boulevard and 'Talbert Avenue frontages pursuant to Section 214.08 PS District: Development Standards and Section 230.88 Fencinu and Yards of the FlBZS0. The applicant has requested a conditional use permit in order to phase development of the remaining 12.5 acres of vacant land located to the north of the existing 23-acre Good Shepherd cemetery property. The existing cemetery provides direct burials, lawn crypts (pre-installed, in-ground, concrete vaults), and cremation niches throughout the developed site. The entrance to the cemetery is restricted to a single access drive off of Talbert Avenue. The Talbert Avenue frontage is partially improved with asphalt curbs and sidewalks, and fencing consisting of"permanent wrought iron and split-face block pilasters. An existing garden crypt building with in approximate height of 20 feet is also located along the Talbert Ave. [montage. The Beach Blvd. frontage has concrete and asphalt curbs, and dirt and concrete sidewalks. The fencing consists of chain link covered.with vines and sections of split face block walls. The undeveloped portion of the property is to the northeast of the existing cemetery and is rectangular in shape. A temporary maintenance yard is located in the center of the undeveloped property. The proposed development swill include construction of a three-story 85,000 square foot mausoleum (an enclosed multi-story crypt and interment building), a 10,000 square foot maintenance facility for housing maintenance equipment and vehicles, and one-story garden crypt:buildings totaling approximately 100,000 square feet along the periinet:er of the subject site. The mausoleum will occupy a prominent location on the cemetery property and is positioned to take advantage of the terminus of the main entrance road from Talbert Avenue. Both the mausoleum and garden crypt buildings include horizontal design elements that incorporate materials such as polished and rough granite, pre-cast concrete, textured concrete., and art glass. The request also includes newly proposed fencing along the Beach Boulevai and Talbert.Avenue frontages at a zero setback in lieu of the required 10-foot setback. The proposed fencing will replace existing chain link and block walls in the same location. The fencing will be a combination of six-foot high split face block walls, pilasters, and sections oiwrouglrt iron. New sidewalks, curbs and gutters Will also be constructed in compliance with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessibility requirements aloe<o the Beach Boulevard._ Talbert Avenue, and Newman Avenue frontages. The onsite improvements include the installation of two new concrete detention areas to collect storm water runoff from the subject site. The reason for the cemetery expansion is based on the diminishing availability of land on the existing ceanetery grounds. The existing crave sites within Good Shepherd limit alternative forms of interment on the subject site which; coupled with the diminishing availability of grave sites. requires that they expand onto the,undeveloped portion of the subject site. The proposed phasing program anticipates the future interment needs of the surroundintu rer?ion over a seven to ten year period (See Attachment No. 3). The project is proposed in three phases and includes the following improvements: PC Staff Report— 11109/04 4- p (04sr29) :3 Phase I is approximately two acres in size and is concentrated at the southwesterly portion of the property, adjacent to the Huntington Beach Hospital's service area and existing cemetery. This phase consists of construction of the maintenance and ,arden crypt building and an adjoining lawn.crypt. area, including installation of a portion of the loop road system. Phase I also includes the proposed off-site installation of curbs. sidewalks, and fencing along Beach Boulevard and Talbert:'Avenue. Phase I will commence shortly after project approval. ❑ Phase 2 is approximately 4.5 acres in size and is located at the north\vesterly corner of the expansion property adjacent to Newman Avenue. It will include the construction of freestanding garden crypts the main mausoleum, and associated loop roads. While it is anticipated that the entire mausoleum will be constructed at one time, it is designed so that it can be constructed in sub-phases, per the demands of the market. The westerly drainage course will be completely improved, with the construction of the remainder of the concrete pipe, and the westerly-most flood detention basin. The Newman Avenue improvements will also be constructed during this phase. Phase 2 would be completed approximately three to six years from the date of'project approval. u Phase 3 completes the development of the cemetery with the buildout of the mausoleum, garden crypts, and,surrounding interment areas. The easterly drainage course and flood control facilities will also be constructed within this phase. Completion of Phase 3 is anticipated at approximately seven to ten years from the date of approval. ISSUES: Suhiect Property And SurrormdinA, Land Use, Zoning And General Plan Des4,,,nations: LOCATION GEN ERAL.PI;,AN ZONING LAND USE. Subject Property: P (Public) PS (Public-Semi-public) Cemetery North of Subject R1:, (Residential Low R.L (Residential Low Single I"amily Homes Property: Density) Density) CO (Commercial Office) CO (Commercial Office) Church East of Subject RM (:Residential Medium RM (Residential.Medium Healthcare Center/ Property: Density) Density') Condominiums South Of Subject CG (Commercial General) CG (Commercial General) Retail Commercial Property: (Walmart Shopping (across Talbert) Center) \'rest of Subject CO (Commercial Office) CO (Commercial Office) Huntington Beach Property: CG (Commercial General) CG (Commercial General) Hospital (across Beach) Retail Commercial General Plan Conformance: The General Plan Land Use Map designation on the subject property is Public. The proposed project is consistent with this designation and the coals and objectives of the City's General Plan as follows: PC Staff Report— 1 1/09/04 -5- (04sr29) A. Land Use Element Dbiect ve LCs 9.4: Provide for the inclusion of recreational. institutional. reliLIous. educational. and service uses that support resident needs within residential neighborhoods. Policy LU 9.4.1: Accommodaic the development ofparks, sports facilities; schools, libraries, conlnlulnity nleetin�, facilities, religious facilities. and similar comm Lill ity-servitl(� uses in all residential areas, provided that they are compatible vwith adjacent residential uses and subject to review and approval by the City and other appropriate agencies. Obje,ctive L U 1-1.1: Provide for the continuation of existing and development of new uses, such as 0overnniental, administrative, public safety, human service, cultural, educational, infrastructure religiouS, and other uses that support the needs of existing and future residents and businesses. Policy LU 1).1.S': Ensure that the.City's public-buildings, sites, and infrastructure improvements .are designed to be compatible in scale, mass, character and architecture with existing buildings and pertinent design characteristics prescribed by this General Plan for the district or net hborhood in which thev are located, and wort: with Iloll-city public agellcies to encourage compliance. The proposed cemetery expansion is consistent with the. General Plan objectives all(] policies by advocating the inclusion of institutional and religious rises that support resident needs ill the City and s11i-1-01.11WITU)region. The use oftllc site as a cemetery fultdis a basic public. necessity 1:61, ilit.ernle:nl and is consistent \vith the General Plan.designation of Public on the subject property. /_ollin- compliance: This project is located in the PS (,Public Senli-Public) zone and complies with the requirements of that zone \vith the exception of the block walls along Beach Blvd. and Talbert Ave. Ul-ban Uesc,-n Guidelines Confimmance: The proposed development is ill Substantial Cs0111701'nlance \Vl.tll the Urball Design GLii(lellneS. The proposed buildings will be compatible with the surrounding area in terms of design, layout, materials, and architecture. The height and class of the buildings are compatible \with adjacent properties. The project incorporates high quality materials and architectural treatments such as pre-cast concrete, polished and rough granite, textured concrete, and colored glass treatments. Staff is recommending that newly proposed perimeter fencing be composed of split-face block pilasters at equal intervals with wroui�1ht iron view fencing which is compatible vrith existing fencing on the subject site. Staff is in support of the proposed design of the subject buildings based on compatibility with surrounding development and compliance with the Design Guidelines. The filial des1g11, colors, alld materials for all the Illlprovemellts are recommended to be reviewed by the Desi(?n Review- Board. Environmental Statics: Staff has revievwed the environmental assessment and detemlined that no siVnificant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project that could not be mitigated to a level of insiDiificanc.e with proper design and engineering. Subsequently, N-fitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 (Attachment No. PC Staff Report— 11!09/04 -6 (04sr `9) 4 was prepared,with mitigation measures pursuant to Section 240.04 of the HBZSO and the provisions of, the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Department advertised draft \Mitigated Negadve Declaration No. 03-0S for thirty (30) days coninwricing on September 13, 2004 and ending oil October 15, 2004. Written correspondence frown the applicant "us received regarding the design of Be detention basins as required by the PLl1-,)I,iC WOrk'S Department. Comments were also received from the Environmental 130ard 1-CCILleMing' information on the types of drought-tolemrit plants proposed oil the project and imwe Wiled information oil the desi-n of the on-she detention basins. No other correspondence regarding the nihigated negraiNe declaration "us ivecived. The major issue identified in the niNg'ated ney&ve declaration is onahe drainage. Currently two natural Isinage swales are located in the area OF the proposed development and serve as a detention basin for StOrlll Water I-1.11101Y \Vc11Cr Il-0111 the subject she and upstream development. Although die proposed development \\,H] not wrierrite at submantial increase in water runoff, the historical VOIL1111C OFrLlnOffNVatCr detained in two natural drainage swales on the subject she du6ng smriii events ctilyeimly exceeds the capacity ol,the downstrealli S1,01-111 drain system. The existing drainage pattern NAII be altered based on the improvanalts proposed on the site, Based on the auemoon or the drainage swMe, We pnoea is raluArd to incorporate Nvater detention basins into tile project design. The size. and desio'll of the detention basins ,Ire subject 10 the review and approval of'the Public Works Department. Prior to any action on Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63, it is necessary Im- (lie Planning Commission to review and act on N/fitigated Negative Declaration AW 0308. SMIT, in it, initial study Of the project is rec,0111111elldilli..; that the mitigated negWive dechradon be approved withfindings and rnhigadon incamilvs to reduce die potential impacts of the development to sunpundhig, development.and compliance with the I [Untill-Ut011 Beach Zoning and SUbdiViSiOn Ordinance (IABZSO). Coa-viti/Suays: Not applicable Not applicable. Desuit Revieit, Board: "I"lle project is subject to review by We Design Review Boand based oil its location fronting Beach Boulevard. The project is recommended to be presented to the Design RCViC\V 130ard subsequent to Plannim-, Conlinky,on approval. Wer DepwVnews Concerits aid Requirements: The Departments ol"Public Works, hire, and Building and Safety have reconunended conditions that are noted for the applicant as typical code requirements or are incorporated into the conditions of approval if they are unique to the project-proposal. PC Staff Report— 11/0904 -7- (04sr29) Public rNottfcatton: Legal notice N,,°as published in the.Huntington Beach/Fountain Valley Independent on Thursday, October 2S, 2004, aIld notices Nvere sent to property o\yners and teriailts of record within a 300 ft. radius of the. subject property, indlvlduals/organizabons requesting ilodficadon (Planning Department's Nodflcation Matrix), applicant, and Interested parties. As of Novelllber 512004, no other c.onlmunlcadon supporting or opposing the request has been received. A community meeting was held on October 26, 2004 to discuss the proposed project. A total of ten neighborhood residents attended the, meexing and commented on the project. Residents from the single family residential neighborhood to the north expressed concern over drainage problems that currently exist on their street and clucstioned whether the project would further impact the drainage: system. "The neighbors were irlfornlcd that as mitigation fir the project, storirl water detention basins would be constructed on-site to accommodate the same amount of volume as currently is stored on the. site.. The residents to the east of the site expressed concern over security within the setback area along the easterly property line. The residents cited an existing problem with loitering and graffiti within the cemetery. The applicant responded that security lighting could be placed at the rear of the garden crypt buildings as a deterrent to potential loiterers. To address this concern staff•has included a condition of approval thal. requires security lighting along Me easterly property line. The applicant also indicated that a security company currently patrols the cemetery (our times throughout the evening to provide: necessary security. The applicant stated that the setback area along Newrllan Ave. would have substantial trees and l ndsmq ing including climbing vines on the walls as a deterrent to graffiti. S1'nff Ims incluifcd a condition Of approval rC(Illiring ghat the property c"vner be responsible for the removal of all gr ilfiti ant rcdtiiring enhanced landscaping to deter graffiti. The neighbors also expressed concerns regarding the two proposal l li-foot access driveways along the Pgmvman Avenue frontage. The applicant indicate:(] that the. sole purpose for these d6ve.ways is to provide access twice a year to maintain the detention basins Stuff has recommended a condition of approval_that limits use oft-he two driveways to maintenance purposes twice a year and ill etwelrgeilcy situations oilly. -9ppltcatioii Pi-ocl'ssitt,, Dates: DATE OF CO1b1.PLETE- APPLICATION: MANDATORY PROCESSING DATE(S): Mit. Nc`,,. Dec.: April 19, 2004 October 15, 2004 (ISO days)* :'tNovertiber 29, 2004 (45-day extension per request letter submitted by applicant) Conditional Use Permit: April 19, 2004 Within 3 months firorn Mir Ne,_,ative Dec-laration Approval .ANALYSIS: The three major issues for analysis ill this proposed cemetery expansion project are the on-site improvements and land use compatibility, the perimeter improvements and aesthetics; and the phasing plan. PC Staff Report— 1 II09/04 -S- (04sr29) On-Site 1171prov""ments The subject cemetery has existed on the site since the, mid 1,900's. Currently the cenietery is linlited to the 11 1. 1 vehicular access point located southerly 21-acre portion of the property. The cemetery has one single vehi Talbert .-%venue. \vhich will remain as the only public access to the cemetery after the. complete build-out of the cernotery expansion. A continuous loop road currently traverses the entire property and will connect to the northerly. UndeVC10]):d Site. Staff Supports the layout of the loop road as It will provide continuous Vehicular access to all portions of'the cemetery and will allow for parking along the side of lh street for visitors to 'tile cemetery. Two gated access point,*, are proposed along Newman A\,,;,IILIC, that allow access twice a Vear for maintenance of tile proposed detention basins. A recommended Condition of approval limits use of. the two driveways along Newman Avenue to twice a year and for emoroency maintenance Situations only. The SLIiloested condition will ensure the limited use of these driveway~ and reduce any potential ad'verse,traffic impacts to the residents north of the site. The proposed three-story MaLISOlet.1111 building will be located at the center of the site and will have substantial setbacks, from ad' cent rcs'denti'll uses to file north and east. The proposed MaLISOICA1111 will N"aid' 1 K setback approximately 2.1() feet to the northerly property line and 410 feet to the easterly property 1111C. The proposed setbacks to the mausoleum building"Substantially exceed the minimum code. I-CClUirellIC-rit. In addition, tile strud.1.11'C, IrIcOrPorale,', a contenip("Uary architectural design that will include quality IIiatcri.a1, and is highly articulated on all four sides of tile building. There will also be approximately 150 to 17� new trees a.nd landscape turf areas Introduced 11111-OL10110111. the site, which will soften the appearance. of the proposed mausoleum. The location and design of the mausoleum will provide substantial setbacks, iIIIPI_OVCd arChileCtUral &Silln, and Increased landscaping throughout the entire site. The abOVC, OrOUnd, one-story garden crypts will be located along the perimeter of the site and are oriented in an inward less n focusing all of dic activity to the Interior of:the site. The bu'ldino will range in height froill approximately IS'feet to 21 feet. The Structures are compatible in design to the mausoleum building incorporating similar materials such as orinite and textured concrete. The design of the garden crypts also incorporate ,,,ariatioli in the roaffine with breaks in the facade. The garden crypts will comply with reCjUlred setbiacks along tile, easterly, westerly and northerly (Newman Ave.) property lines. In response to neighbor concerns re-ardi.no loitering and s'ecurity of the site, staff is recommending a condition of Z -, I I -, g UI)IN-OVa1 re(IIIIIA11,12, security lighting alono the easterly property line. The landscape setback along the Newn-inn Avenue will be heavily landscaped with trees, shrubs, and climbing landscaping to provide additional buffering to adjacent residential uses and to act .,Is .,t deterrent for graffiti. Staff supports the proposed location of the garden crypts based on adequate, separation from.adjacent residential uses, OICII, inward, orientation, the architectural design, landscape buffers, and Security lighting The proposed 10,000 square foot maintenance facility will be located adjacent to the Huntington Be-,,.ch Hospital property, at the. southwest corner of the undeveloped site. The maintenance facility will be setback approximately 420 feet from the nearest residential property to the north of the site. The facility houses all of the, maintenance. eqUipm.ent, supplies, and fuel for the cemetery. The building will be a combination garden cry,)t building and mainumance facility. The garden crypt portion of the building will be visible to the rest of the cemetery site and will incorporate the same design and materials as the other garden crypt buildings. The,portion of the building that houses the maintenance facility will be enclosed PC Staff'Report- 111109.104 -9- (04sr29) and not visible to the public. As a result of the new deli 2n and orientation of the maintenance building, the. issuC, of noise bei.ni; generated from the buildinu have been reduced and.<'or eliminated. i - I The increased separation to the maintenance facility and construction of new perimeter crypt buildings Will minimize noise impacts to adjacent residential properties currently experienced with the temporary facility. Staff.Supports the proposed location and design of the maintenance facility as it provides a substantial buffer from adjacent residential properties and incorporates the same design and materials as the other garden cr�q)t buildings. Perimeter Improve nzents i The project proposes the installation of perimeter fencing along the entire BeachBoulevard frontage all(] a portion of the Talbert Avenue frontape stretching from the soutlaurest corner of the site to the existing i mausoleutll. T11e appl_iCant is f.woposing 20-foot long sections of six-toot high split face block va-all with intermittent four-foot wide Sections of view fencing. The.existing Cencin- is located on the property Iine and cannot meet the required 10-foot setback based on the location of existing grave, sites. Since there is no opportunity to comply with the required setback and provide landscaping in front of the perimeter walls to soften their appearance, staff is recommending that the walls be composed of six-foot tall wrought-iron view fencing with split-face block pilasters at. equal 20-1oot intervals. This design is consistent with the view fencing already existing along Talbert Ave. The incorporation of vices fencing to offset the inability to provide a landscape setback along Beach. Blvd and Talbert Ave. will permit clear visibility of landscaped areas and trees already existing oil the Subject site. The Newman Avenue fronla('e will include new public improvements and a 2046ot landscaped setback. 'The proposal is to provide decorative block walls all(] garden crypt buildings at the 2046ot setback along the Newman. Aven:uc ffrontage. .In order to soften the look of the rear of these crypt buildings, the applicant is proposing a landscaped.berna up against the rear ofthe garden crypt buildings in conjunction with trees and climbing ]andscapitag. The rear off the garden crypt buildings is also designed with vertical offsets in the Facade to allow for shadow patterns, adding interest to the design_ A six-foot high block walls will be located between the garden crypt buildings and will provide a visual break along this frontage. The perimeter improvements along Newman Avenue will greatly improve the frontage based on the 20-foot setback, enhanced landscaping, and the overall design of the buildings. The southwest cornier of the site (Beach/Talbert intersection) will also be upgraded with tlew m.onun1ent signaue, landscaping mid fencing. A.pre-cast concrete monument\vill be erected to identify the cemetery, stn-routided by raised and at-grade planters with trees, shrubs, and ground cover. A new stamped concrete paving pattern is proposed in front of the proposed planters. I-he existing curb cuts at the subject location will be elitrainated to allow- for new a new Curb, gutter, and sidewalk. The proposes] modifications to the southwest comer of the site will provide an updated appearance and provide a focal point that identifies the cemetery as a landmark in the City. The existing Talbert mausole.urn vvas built in 1.96S. The design of the visible portion of the structure is stark and unarticulated. The applicant is proposing to upgrade the facade of the existing mausoleum by introducing metal panels with cutouts and lighting. The existing bollards located at the base of the mausoleum will be removed to allow for a continuation of a low split-face wall directly in front of the PC Staff Report— 11109/04 -10- (04sr29) I i j structure. The upgrades to the southerly fagade of the existing-, maLISOletlnl will improve the overall aesthetics and articulation of the structti.re. The Iast improvement is the Talbert \venue entrance to the. site. The existing. improvements consist of i sections of six-foot high split face block walls with sections of view fencing. There are two vehicular gates that are always open during the cemetery operating? hours. Staff is recommending thlt adequate turn around space be provided in the event that a car needs to turn around if tile- gates are closed. The main entrance to the subject site along Talbert Avenue-will be enhanced with new landscaping in existing planters and new sighs consistent' Of raISed I1ldlvldual metal lettering depicting the name Of the cellleterv. These proposed improvements will a-pdatc the look of the entrance to the cemetery and provide nevy i identification. 1111(ising Pro(11,0111 I The applicant is proposing a three-part phasing plan for all l.he irnprovcnlent,S prOI)OSed On the Subject site. See Project Proposal on page 5 ofthis report_ Stall'does not support t11e applicant's proposed phasing progra m, based on the tinlin" 01;the perimeter improvements along Newman Avc. and construction of the detention basins, which are not proposed until the second please. This phase is estinlate.d at three to six years from the date of approval of the conditional use permit. The subject property is located adjacent' to residential property to the ❑orth that has historically experienced problems with run-Off from the subject site as a result of large Sloan events. The residents have expressed concerns regarding the potential Impacts to drainage as a result of the project. Staff is recommending that all required drainage facilities, public improvements, and perimeter improvements be Ill place within the first phase. 'IIlie recommendations are made based oil the premise of protecting residents Iro111 any potential impacts relating to storm water runoff(flooding) and provide the required public and perimeter improvements to address the perimeter access and aesthetics of the site. The two remaining phases and their scheduled improvements are satisfactory and remain as originally proposed by tlhe applicant. SUMMARY: As conditioned, and with the implementation of mitigation measures, the project is consistent with the Public-Semipublic land use designation. Staff recommends approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 and Conditional Use Permit No. 00-63 for the following reasons: The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan designation Of Pt1bI'C On the subject site. The protect cotllpiles with all development standards Idelll'l:fled III the HuI1tington Beach 7oIlln­ tend Subdivision Ordinance. o The proposed development is consistent with the existing cemetery use and can be integrated and be sensitive to the SUrroundnlg land uses with adequate setbacks, landscaping, and design amenities. The project will not be, detrimental to the general health, welfare and safety to persons working. or living in the area, nor detrimental to the value of the property or improvements in the area. 44 F gpt (° PC Staff Report— 11/091104 -11- (04sr29) ATTILC HNNI E NTS: I Sup -pested I"iI nclings and Conditions of approval -CUP No. 00-61 11 -,.-I e%, 1 11 site, Plan. Floor Plans rind E -at*ons dated June 24, 2004 3. Narrative elated October 7, 2003 4. \-litig'ated Negative Deckinition No. 03-08 & Comment letters iA A, PC Staff Report— 11/09/04 -12- (04sr29) 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ! StIGGESTE-D FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF A- PPROVAL NMITIGA'TI: D NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08 CONDITIONAL, USE PERNIF1' O. 00-63 SUG{:h;STED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL— MITIGATED D NEGATIVE DECI.;.kRATION NO. 03-08 : 1 . IMiti^ated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 has been prepared in compliance with Article 6 ofthe California hnvironmental QLlaiity :het (CEQA) Guidelines. It %vas aclx ertised and available for a public comment period ol't.hirty (30) days. Comments received during the comment period were considered by the Plannillu, ConulIission prior to action on the Nlitigated Nc,,ative Declaration and - Condi.tional Use Permit No. 00-63. 2. measures are rec_onnuended to .avoid or reduce the projects eflcets to a point VNrllere clearly m) sienilicant effect in tile, enviri)runent will occur. 3. 'I'herc is no substantial evidence III light of the. whole record before the Planning Conanaission that t1ac project, as mitigated, will have a sil,nil.icant effect on the environment. i S000ESTI�;D FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL, - COND[T11QNAI., USE PERMIT NO. 00-63: 1 . C oIlditi(.)nal Use Permit No. 00-63 4:or the establishment, maintenance and operation ofa tauec-phase expansion ol'the:existin" ')3 acre cemetery including the construction Of.*a i approximately 85,000 j square loot, three-story mausoleum, an approximately 10.000 square 'foot maintenance facility, and ahove-ground garden crypts totalilag approximately 100,000 square. Icet oil 12.5 undeveloped acres i adjacent to the existilIo cemetery and to permit apprc)ximately 980 lineal feet ol'si:a-foot tall decorative block \walls and view fencing at iI zero setback along the. Beach 13ouleyard and Talbert Avenue fi-onta,,,es will not be detrimental to the general welfare ofpersons working or residing in the vicinity or detrimental to the value oi'the property and improvements in the neighborhood. '1"he-proposed project meets or exceeds all Huntinuton Beach loninu and Subdivision Ordinance standards. Based Upon the conditions imposed, the cemetery expansion \vill be desiumed with adequate setbacks. landscape bui'ferin<�. and quality architecture and materials which will be, compatible with adjacent residential and commercial properties. With the implementation of NIND No. 03-08 mitigation measures, conditions of approval. and design modifications, the potential impacts of the project have been mitiLiated to a level of insli-mif1cance. �. The conditional use permit will be compatible with SUITOLIndlm�,£ LISeS Which Consist Of residential properties to the north and east. medical office uses to the west and the existing cemetery to the south Of the subject site. The height of the buildings in proximity to residential uses will be limited to a one story building with. a maximum height of 18 feet. Setbacks will be entirely landscaped with trees. shrubs and ,round cover to provide a buffer from nearby residential uses. Security lighting will also (04-sr29 CUP 00-63 NTND 03-08) ° x v i p , . �..... be provided wilhill tile setback area adjacent to residential uses along_ the easterly property line to deter loitering activity. -3. "I'lle proposed Conditional Use Permit 'N'o. 00-63 Nvill comply with the provisions of the base district and other applicable provisions in Titles 20-25 of We Ilumington l3cach Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance and any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. 4. The granting of the condbional use permit will not adversely affect the General Ilan. h is consiment with the Land Use Element designation of Public on the subject property. In addition. it is consistent with the following goals and policies of the. Aneml flan: Wwal f0c Oencint Djc c tii.c l-1, 9.4: Provide 1`61- tile inclusion of recreational, institutional. religious, educaiional, and service toes that support resident needs within residential nei.ghhorhoods. Polo cv LU 9 4 1 Accommodate the develtyimilent orpain", Sports flacilities, Schools, libraries, coill III Lill ity illecting, I'acilitics, religious facilities, and shih% community serving+ uses in all residential areas, provided that they are comp oible with ad,jacent residential use, And subject to review, and approval by the. City and other appropriate aocl Icli es. /33.1: Provide I"or the continua ion of existino and developrileni 01"new uses, SLtell -IS governillental, administrative, public Safety, human service, cultural, Aucational, infrastructure, rCli�',JOUS, alld Other Uses that SUI)l)(11-1 tile, needs ofcxistill- and fulurc residents and businesses. V Ljj F-'Jollre that the City's public buillngs, sites, and inbustnIchwe Ympl,wernelits are ded-ned to be compmibk in scale, mass, character and archhecture %vith existing buildings and pertinent design characteristics prescribed by this Cieneial Man for We dKINO cw neighborhood in "Alich they are located, and Nvork NOT non-city puNic alellCiCS to eIICOLII-agC compliance. 'Ile proposed cernetery, expansion is consistent with the Gicneral Plan objectives and policies by advocming the inclusion of inwAdolud and reli��-'iOUS USCS that Support resident needs in the City '-IIICI Surrounding wgion. Good Shepherd is the only cemetery in Humingkxn Fkawh. The use or the she as a ceinetery fulfills a bade public necessity for the interment of family members and kwed Ones and is consistent \,vith the General Man designiation ol,'Puhlic oil the sllb.jCCt pl-01-VI-ty. 04sr29 CU".],00-63 NIND,03-08) SUGGESTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - CONDiTiONAL USE PERK-11T NO. 00-63: I. The site, plait. floor plans. and elevations received and dated June 24, 2004 shall be the conceptually- approved design with the ti?llowin_g modifications: a. All fencing proposed along the. Beach Blvd. and Talbert Ave. frontages shall be w-rougtlt iron view fencing and incorporate split face pilasters at 2046ot intervals. b. Secti by lighting shall be installed at the rear of the garden crypt bui-ldings located along the easterly property line. Lighting, will be Added so as to not spill onto adjacent residential properties. c-. The existing anain entry drive at Talbert Ave. shall be redesigned to provide, adetluaw turnaround area 11or a vehicle_ when the gates are closed. The main entry drive shall be fully handicap compliant with access ramps in conformance with 'title 24. (MV) d. The 2046ot setback located salon the Newman Ave. frontage shall incorporate enhanced landscaping consistirl" of(aces, shrubs, and climbing landscaping oil perimeter walls to deter graffit! In addition, a landscape berm shall be provided against the rear of the garden crypt buildings kwated along the Ne wnimi Ave. Wit:age. 2. Prior to submittal for building pcnnits, the Design Review Board shall review tllc design, colors. and mal.ci ials of*the proposed rnausoletun, garden crypts, maintenance building, perimeter fcalcing, ind all improvements proposed at the subject site. j. Ile phasing, program as outlined In the narrative dated Anober 7, 2003. shall be modified to InCIUde the following within the Not phase ofconstruction: a. Construction of both detention basins including all appurtenant drainage pipes prior to issuance 01' ally permits oil t,l,le undeveloped site. b. A1l public improvemenm Wig, Beach Blvd_, Talbert Ave., and Newman Ave. 4. The property owner shall be responsible IS the removal ofall ME From the subject site within 24 hours. 5. Ile two diiveways located along the Newman Ave. frontage shall he used tier access to and for the sole purpose of maintaining the detention basins. Ile two driveways and access shall be permi.tte_d Wee a yea' and in emergency situations only. 1 DF--NjNrF1CArL()N .A?qD i1OLD HARMLESS CONDITION: The ownei" of the property which is the suhtect of this project aIld the project applicant ifdiftere'nt from the propel, owner, and each of their heirs, successors and assigns, shall defend, indemnify and hold harnlle:ss the. Chy of I-funtinoon Beach and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceedings. liability cost, including auorne f s fees and costs against the City or its a,_ents, officers or employees, to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the City.. including but not limited to any (04sr29 CUP 00-63 ivtND 03-08) phi 1AUTAU", I � approv-al granted by the Cite COLIIICIL Planning Commission. or Design Review Board concerning this project.cct. The City shall prompt.1v notify the applicant of any claim. action or proceedina and should . cooperate fully in the defense. thereof. (04zr-19 CUP 00-6) NI-ND 03-08) "gl .AM WALL MUN 2 rntwri. . OARDON 2 -E 7�I - t_ 7 ;6M ww aum clux"m Im ovw smarm se HIM OUTLET STRUCTURE 52CVORS K&M;.Tm K"CrDRAW" Ngwmm %J li iclim 4 �IPM U NANCE&T C,01 dffM AO�INTAL Pam UTAL —4 4"­ a IN A lt:7 r "'J *scum 7`-1 "Alecncswra QT-A, PIMART am Ji� Ri r N"Myoumum f "7777777-777 srrE PLAN SCALE.,V-W-T 4p Lamm C.U.P. SITE PLAN 7`1 FRASS U)Ur I PHASES 1, 2 AND 3 mwm FRASS PRAW 2 PHAW 3 tIN,� ' 1, �.._.. kJ r%,) i ii� , '� (1 -------------------- AL 15 4! 1 '� it t�, � � .1 l fl--�.. i -�,,«..•' , i' i r :Fii:!: t� r LAS GOOD SHEPHERD CEMETERY m LANDSCAPE MASTER PTAN- HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA At'!? -Tit NE iV YEWA '177 eop k2 2, FEATURE 33,00\,T m�,' -1.5 1 FS,3 27 70.171 9 4 1 PHASE 2; 2 ; 6 ,; J 1 13 �5 §N�CEMEMyDPJVK 2e, PHASE 2 24.901 H Ifiv FF FrAlulte 7.- FEA lllitE j SI COVERED 6EWALK �YP u I 0: 10 ^19.42 TC' 38 07 FS 1 23 26 It 28:92 FS �d To 44" E FF !PHASE 3 R LE' LE � F, -40 6 f4 �42 FS-C8 .3 TS 3! r rA rijitc 5 42- S (3.37) --tf -PAVEMENT,,-- JV, 54 27�FS vj MAINTENANCE..YARD 4-1 rI C T i SS-I o.(,�iK '"XI S Tit I G 2 51 1 v L 37 1 FS 'r y. PHASE 1 '0, 2 _:m m45.0�FIG 43.20 FL-HP 60�FS, 4q 37J S Tm WMAN C' "It '. 7� - 7 I x!!!I I t T - W CMRY DRIVE P r0GOObS 7 , THASE-3 c u P..*cONCEPTUAT LAN? SCALE I INEW WROUGHTMONNERBtfETERtLX i �2G.IPIC8000010GOOO-6rH-COPrd.g 'ASTERS-PHA 21:42 A. PDT TENCQ AND PIL FIELDS DEVEAEAUX p1 SING I AEEAS � yr=• � I �, � 1 � 1�111111 y111L : ML: COlM1YA40 •• G9uT,!M � •— _� Gow tlflN1 �� CPlei��l0 �� � Y � � iT1LL171L IL7lIL71L17L 1171D■ t � ., Q _ 1 Y(M A1.IOII-- pW'(1 tlt10N f0 OC30� � � £ A `.' p� ___ ` � ^ n ♦ � uw Wtl _� . 1 p 0Y _-__________ ole[n ��i.l W1LLL�1: I" � •-1 LL111L.111 t: _ __'1 I \ .1 LL11J.11LJ li 1�����:�, M 111��4.w :• / it zrcn. Gf1Y�W p 1 F COLW!YMo g CJI�IT '; a S�V4�YM0 ... 1 x^rr MAUSOLEUM curµ m]vn!a w n+vr:•a.asa f100A PIAMS 3RD FL00 2ND FLOOR 1ST FLOOR FLOOR MEN— FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN +he'-+•_ + ) Al101 00 a© FI EL0S OEYEREAUR AA(XIFE(tS iINGI AFf Af off MAU i00D SNFMEID 1F1E1fTt1 (Z UM NORTHLELEVATION .enm +nr.r-v till LW,k,- naa�►en ' fiY+n t]HI to MINES mij ni" r ? tin _ _— - - D -- iPH �♦�� 'i.� ._.....m..�._- ------------------- " s NAIISDtEUN r" AND GARDEN CDC (UPTS RE NAINTENAN(E EEEIAEIONS MAU�OL�U,M - WEST ELEVATION MAUSOLEUM n EAS ELttvvA71ON SIMILAR z S UTH ELEVATION -AIW. ,.,.. �� . fie oo, ,/te•-Yd ,am, ,/,�'.,•-a• .+..r�iiow IL- ' A5.001 FIELDS DEVEREAUX AA(NI iE(Ef A[AGIAE[Af MAUSppLEUM LONGITUDINAL SECTION f000 fAE11EiD QMfm t'i1 t gill Lb.,k— n�o=a caror i 1tr,29Ot :� ( 17N. ttrrx ncx nn (2� TRANER E SECTION -' F> ;z .s r-' y MAUSOLEUM Slaloms AS.101 F I ELDS DIVEAEAUX Ti GARDEN CRYPT SOUTH ELEVATION Y. WTE� GARDEN CRYPT r2'\ SOUTH ELEVATION dit 74 GARDEN CRYPT NORTH ELEVATION GARDEN CRYPTS ILIVAlloms GARDEN CRYPT NORTH ELEVATION A5.002 FILLDS DEVEREAUX ANCNII E(II AE NGI NEEAf u snoa�a u w. GARDEN CRYPTS AT MAINTENANCE —S= T SOUTH T ELEVAa 'm T 91E►NE1D .__ EIlEIEQ rp nx� OM'R IIJCL �� LLYI.tWNCe 20'-p' JI'-a Ica amI` }e-z• 1 n'-e' � r:-r j zs-.• y :7-,r j n'-e• y zn-a• j ze-e• j nn Ir.n 4s — Nsettn M zj �•-1+• r-o ao'-a• r-o w'-a- LW111J Li1111JLJJ.AIJJ Lill LLLJ tr...nui 4-e' ac-e' a7-e• � m .a r u. c _ t GARD N CRYPTS CARD€N CRYPTS AT MAINTENANCE T °< 4 L PLAN C1 -FLOO PLAN "q Bros Vlr.rt !!.= GARDEN(ATM NINEAT NAINTENAN(PI, MANI SECTIONS c —1 EIRAlIONf GGARDEEN CRYPTS AT MAINTENANCE GARDEN YTS AT MAINTENANCE OS5 SECTION a NORTHWE IEVATIQN y Iapw +/+r-r-v ianm Vn•-+•d AS.003 Good Shepherd Cemetery Conditional Use Permit CUP-00-63 Submitted To: City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Contact: Paul Da Veiga Associate Planner 714-536-5271 Submitted by Diocese of Orange P.O. Box 14195 Orange, CA Contacts: Joe Novoa 714-282-3121 Director, Construction Services Mike Wesner 714-919-1610 Director, Cemetery Operations INTRODUCTION Proiect Summary This Use Permit package has been prepared to provide the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission with the necessary information to approve an expansion to the Good Shepherd Cemetery, located at the corner of Talbert and Beach. .(See Exhibit 1: Area Map) Currently, the Cemetery is limited to the southerly 23-acre part of the property. This existing area is approximately 90% occupied or committed, and at this time, offers Direct Burials, Lawn Crypts (Lawn Crypts are pre-installed, in-ground, concrete vaults), and Cremation Niches as interment options. Recently, the Diocese of Orange embarked on a Master Plan of improvements for the Cemetery to improve irrigation operational efficiencies and the look and health of the landscaping (project complete), provide much needed additional cemetery product, and enhance the perimeter. The total scope of the proposed expansion project is depicted on the Master Phasing Plan which primarily encompasses the buildout of the remaining undeveloped, northerly, 12.5 acre Cemetery property. (See Exhibit 2: Master Phasing Plan) Several new buildings are proposed for this vacant area: a Mausoleum (an enclosed multi-story crypt and niche interment building); a combined Maintenance Facility/Garden Crypt building (a Garden Crypt is an open-air, one-story crypt and niche interment structure); additional free-standing Garden Crypt buildings; and Private Mausoleums (smaller, single-family open-air and enclosed structures). Off site, new sidewalks and fences will be constructed along the Cemetery's Beach, Talbert, and Newman street frontages; also, new signage will be installed along Beach and Talbert. On site, waters flowing in the existing urban drainage courses will be placed in concrete pipes, with flood control detention areas at the downstream edge of the property. Significant amounts of landscaping will also be installed. (See Exhibit 3: Landscape Master Plan) The project will be constructed in three phases. Phase I will consist of the Maintenance Facility/Garden Crypt building and an adjoining lawn crypt area, and the surrounding private roads. A small portion of the westerly drainage course will be placed in a concrete pipe, with additional interim flood control improvements. Phase I also includes the improvements along Beach and Talbert. Phase I construction will commence shortly after approval of the Conditional Use Permit, and be complete within two years. Phase II will include the initial phase of the free-standing Garden Crypts, the initial Mausoleum, and the associated private roads. The westerly drainage course will be completely improved, with the construction of the remainder of the concrete pipe, and the ultimate west flood control detention basin. The Newman street improvements will also be constructed with this Phase. Phase II would be constructed approximately three to six years from now. Phase III completes the development of the Cemetery, with the buildout of the Mausoleum, Garden Crypts, and surrounding horizontal interment areas. The easterly drainage course and flood control facilities will also be constructed with this phase. Depending upon demand, this last Phase will be constructed approximately seven to ten years from now. Purpose and Scope of Use Permit This document has been prepared in order to provide the City of Huntington Beach Planning Commission with the necessary background and supporting documentation to approve the following discretionary actions: Permit the construction of an 85,000sf Mausoleum, Garden Crypt buildings totaling 100,000sf, a 10,000sf Maintenance Facility, and Private Mausoleums; Permit all grading and construction of infrastructure and drainage improvements, including the placement of the existing storm water drainage courses in concrete pipes, connecting to similar facilities both upstream and downstream, with flood control detention basins; Permit construction of all landscape, sidewalk, and fencing improvements, along Beach, Talbert, and Newman; and Permit the Project to be constructed in three major Phases. ° � T �� l PROJECT BACKGROUND History The Cemetery was established by the Huntington Beach Company in 1907 (before the City's incorporation in 1909) on a four-acre parcel at the corner of what is now known as Beach and Talbert; access was at the Beach/Talbert intersection. At that time, the Huntington Beach Company wanted to redevelop their exiting cemetery on Reservoir Hill in Pacific City; several remains were relocated from the old cemetery to the Good Shepherd site. Over the years, numerous civic and public figures came to be buried at the Cemetery, as well as several Civil War veterans who became enamored of the area during popular encampment reunions held at the City around the turn of the 19th/20th centuries. After World War II, the City started to grow beyond its original boundaries near the ocean, and the farms around the Cemetery were transformed into residential neighborhoods, schools, and small commercial buildings. In the late 1950's, the low-lying area downstream and north of the Cemetery was filled in and developed into blocks of single-family residences, resulting in the ponding of stormwaters on the upstream vacant property, south of Newman. In the early 1960's the existing cemetery and an additional 19 acres were sold to Dr. Paine, who constructed a residence at the east end of the property. In the mid 1960's, the Diocese of Los Angeles acquired the existing cemetery from Dr. Paine and the approximately 12.5 acre vacant property to the north. Also during the mid 1960's, all of the property was transferred to the newly created Diocese of Orange, and the Diocese separated 4.5 acres to create a parcel for the St. Vincent de Paul Church. Dr. Paine's house was transformed into the rectory for the new Church. Until the existing Garden Crypt structure was built in 1968, only direct burials occurred at the Cemetery. In the early 1980's, a new office was constructed, along with a new entrance on Talbert; and recently, Lawn Crypts were installed. The General Plan designation for the property is P(OS-P) Public — Open Space, and the Zoning is PS Public/Semipublic; this submittal is consistent with the appropriate development standards, so no variances are requested. Per the Zoning Codes, a Use Permit is required for the proposed development. An application for a Use Permit was first submitted to the City in September 2000, as CUP-00-63. During the ensuing three years, several screencheck comments and responses have been transmitted between the City and the Diocese. The Diocese also took the opportunity to refine the Master Plan. This submittal is in response to the City's last screencheck comments, dated September 20, 2002. Existing Site Conditions The Cemetery is surrounded by commercial and residential uses. To the south, across Talbert, is a Walmart store and several smaller free-standing fast-food and commercial establishments. To the west, across Beach, are several, small, one-story strip mails, and other commercial establishments. To the northwest is the Huntington Beach Hospital. Across from Newman to the north are a two- story medical office building, a two-story church, and several single-family homes. To the east are the Huntington Valley Healthcare Center and the Tamarack Village townhomes. Access to the Cemetery is restricted to a single access off of Talbert. (See Exhibit 4: Talbert Avenue Main Entrance) The Talbert street frontage is partially improved with asphalt curbs and sidewalks, and fencing consisting of either sections of permanent wrought-iron and split-face block pilasters (See Exhibit 5: Talbert Avenue West of Main Entrance) or plain split-face block wall, with concrete-filled steel bollards located adjacent to the existing Garden Crypt structure. (See Exhibit 6: Talbert Avenue East of Beach Boulevard) The Beach frontage has concrete and asphalt curbs, and dirt and concrete sidewalks. Along Beach, vines cascade over the existing chain link fencing and split face block wall. (See Exhibit 7: Beach Boulevard Frontage) Remnants from the original access remain at the corner of Beach and Talbert. (See Exhibit 8: Old Beach & Talbert Access) The Newman street frontage consists of older concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalks, and a few mature eucalyptus trees (See Exhibit 9: Newman Avenue Frontage) The undeveloped property is rectangular in shape, and is bounded on the southerly side by the existing Cemetery. (See Exhibit 10: South Interior Along Existing Cemetery) On the west side is a six foot concrete block wall that surrounds the Huntington Beach Hospital service area (See Exhibit 11: Huntington Beach Hospital) Also along the west side, on Cemetery property, is an overhead electrical line that services the Hospital. On the north boundary is a six foot chain link fence along Newman (See Exhibit 12: North Interior Along Newman) Along the east side, there is a five foot block wall adjacent to the Huntington Valley Healthcare Center (See Exhibit 13: Huntington Valley Health Care) and a six-foot wood fence along the Tamarack Village Townhomes (See Exhibit 14: Tamarack Village Townhomes). A temporary, fenced-in Maintenance Yard is located in the middle of the undeveloped property. The topography of the vacant property is gentling rolling, with elevations ranging from 28 to 47 feet msl. Waters from upstream developments and public streets course through the Cemetery and the Church through storm drain pipes under the private roads and parking lots, and then through the undeveloped Cemetery property to Newman Street on the north, towards either one of two storm water inlet structures, which in turn are connected to 36"RCP and 48"RCP pipes under Newman. The underlying geology consists of sands and clays. Operations and Maintenance Hours of Operation The Cemetery is open every day of the year from 8am to 5pm in the winter, and until 6pm in the summer. The Office is not open on Sundays and some Holidays. Services are held from gam to 4pm Monday to Saturday, except for Holidays. Most maintenance work occurs from 8am to 5pm, Monday to Friday; rarely, maintenance will occur on a Saturday. Types of Activities and Equipment The primary activities at the Cemetery are the interment of remains and associated grave-side services. Currently this typically involves the excavation of a burial plot; in the future, as more facilities are constructed, the interments will involve the placement of remains in the crypts and niches of the various structures and in-ground vaults, generating significantly less dirt spoils. The secondary activity is the maintenance of the site's landscaping, primarily the mowing of the turf and the pruning of trees and shrubs. The main lawn mowing activities are performed once a week on a weekday, by a larger, tractor-mower. The lawn-mowers are self-mulching models, so there is little or no green waste from the turf maintenance activities. Roll-off trash containers are placed within the temporary Maintenance Yard. These bins are typically removed once a week during normal business hours; the majority of the waste is flowers and decorations left by visiting relatives. The types of equipment stored and used at this facility are: Three (3) four-wheeled diesel tractors, with trailer, mower, backhoe, and frontloader attachments Two (2) 72" gasoline riding lawn mowers Two (2) gasoline lawn vacuum trailers One (1) diesel air-compressor (assists in compacting grave backfill) Gasoline edge trimmers Gasoline hand mowers Several general-duty pickup trucks Hand tools Miscellaneous irrigation parts and hoses Cemetery operations-related equipment (chairs, canopies, etc.) Concrete crypts Minor amounts of bagged sand and concrete There is not currently, nor will there be in the future, any bulk storage of fertilizers, herbicides, or pesticides; these items are purchased in just the quantity needed and applied promptly via approved means. Most of the larger pieces of mechanized equipment run on diesel, which is stored in 55-gallon drums. Gasoline is stored in 5-gallon cans. Irrigation water for the Cemetery is supplied from an on-site well, which was recently refurbished and enlarged to meet the needs of the expansion area. With the proposed expansion, there will be a minor increase in maintenance activities, but the operating hours and basic procedures will remain the same as existing. MASTER PLAN OVERVIEW Expansion Area Layout Most of the new improvements will be constructed on the remaining vacant 12.5 acre parcel north of the existing cemetery. The Good Shepherd Cemetery Master Plan for this expansion area is designed to create strong relationships between the built forms and the landscaping areas. The buildings are in service with the landscaping, either as carefully considered and positioned objects within the landscape, or as garden walls that enclose and frame the landscape. The result is 'a serene and peaceful park setting, appropriately created to honor the memorial function of the cemetery. (See Exhibit 15: Expansion Area Master Plan) The two primary building forms are the Mausoleum and the Garden Crypts. Overall, all of the project's buildings have been designed to be of a similar vernacular, consisting of clean lines and simple forms. The direct and well- proportioned development of the basic forms gives the design a timeless quality, and although it does not evoke period associations to a particular architectural style, there are elements that are reminiscent of architects Le Corbusier, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Moneo/Daly, with influences from artists like Mondrian. The buildings are primarily open air to take advantage of the prevailing onshore breezes, and planned with views and convenient passage into the landscape of the lawn burial gardens. In addition to the Garden Crypts and Mausoleum, the Cemetery will permit the construction of a limited number of smaller Private Mausoleums. The buildings will be constructed primarily of cast-in-place concrete, with granite finishes in warm, earth-tones. None of the buildings will have exterior lights that will create glare offsite. On-Site Improvements The primary on-site improvements are the regrading of the surface, and the placement of the existing open storm water drainage courses into pipes, with open-water detention basins at the downstream end of the property. The proposed development will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern or the quantity of flow. The onsite drainage will be conveyed through a combination of the aforementioned pipes, and the road gutters, in approximately the same locations as the exiting courses, to the existing downstream onsite inlet structures. Each phase will be designed to be balanced, so there is no import or export of dirt. Based upon previously submitted Hydrology and Hydraulic studies, the City has determined the methodology for ascertaining the size of the storm drain facilities. Per the Department of Planning of the City of Huntington Beach, " a hydrology and hydraulic study shall address and provide for onsite/detention capacity to accommodate existing conditions plus increased runoff resulting from the proposed development without flooding into Newman Avenue or negatively impacting the existing deficient downstream storm drainage systems. The study and design analysis shall limit stormwater runoff from the site to the undeveloped pre-1986 10-year storm event. The onsite area of detention shall be comparable to the existing historical volume detained within the project boundary" Preliminary calculations have already been performed, and result in the pipe and detention sizes shown. (See Exhibit 16: Master Grading Plan) Prior to each phase of development, detailed and project-specific Hydrological and Hydraulic studies will be submitted that outline the improvements required for that phase. The other on-site improvements include the private driveways and utilities required to support each phase. The private driveways will be reviewed for exact width to comply with the City's Fire access requirements, and constructed of asphalt with rolled concrete curbs. Water, sewer, and electrical utilities will be brought into the site and distributed as needed. All new utilities will be undergrounded. Off-Site Improvements The primary off-site improvements consist of new curbs and gutters, sidewalks, and fences along the Cemetery's Beach, Talbert, and Newman frontages. In addition new monumentation signage will be installed at the Talbert entrance, and at the Beach/Talbert intersection, with a minor sign at the north end of the Beach frontage. In conjunction with the Talbert/Beach monument project, the northeast corner's street intersection traffic signal and control systems will be upgraded. Master Phasing Plan The Project is the master-planned improvement and expansion of the Good Shepherd Cemetery. The principle improvements consist of the construction of a permanent maintenance facility, much needed additional interment options and inventory, new sidewalks and exterior fencing, and new monumentation signage. (See again Exhibit 2: Master Phasing Plan). The majority of the improvements will occur on the currently vacant, northerly parcel. Phase I The expansion project will be constructed in three phases. The Phase I portion of the expansion project consists of a combined Garden Crypt/Maintenance Facility, adjoining Lawn Crypt areas, and the surrounding private roads. A small portion of the existing, westerly drainage course under the Maintenance Facility will be placed in a proposed 51" Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP), and the existing downstream detention area will be temporarily expanded and improved. Also during Phase I, the project will install new curb, sidewalk, and fencing along the entire Beach Boulevard frontage, new fencing along Talbert from the corner of Beach and Talbert to the end of the existing Garden Crypt, and a new sidewalk along the entire Talbert frontage. In addition, the traffic signal system at Beach and Talbert will be graded. New monument signage will be installed at the corner of Beach and Talbert, and minor improvements will be made at the existing entrance. Development efforts will commence immediately upon City approval, and be complete two years later. Phase II Phase II will include the initial phase of the free-standing Garden Crypts, the initial phase of the Mausoleum, additional ground-burial inventory, and the associated private roads. The westerly drainage course would be entirely improved, with construction of the remainder of the proposed 51" RCP, and the ultimate storm drain flood control detention facility; at the same time, the easterly drainage course will be temporarily expanded and improved. Also during Phase II, new curb, sidewalks, fencing, and landscaping will be installed along Newman. Phase II will commence immediately after Phase I and will complete three to six from now. Phase III Phase III will complete the buildout of the Cemetery, with the final phase(s) of the Mausoleum, and additional Garden Crypts and ground-burial product. The easterly drainage course will be placed in a proposed 54" RCP pipe, and the ultimate storm drainage flood control detention facility will be constructed. Phase III will start after Phase II and complete seven to ten_years from now. These Phases are described in further detail in later sections. ARCHITECTUML RESIGN Mausoleum The design of the Mausoleum establishes a vocabulary of built forms and materiality that is carried throughout the landscape and Garden Crypts design. In the middle of the expansion area, the Mausoleum will occupy a prominent location on the Cemetery property. The Mausoleum complex is positioned to take advantage of the terminus of the main entrance road, as well a command of the surrounding areas. The Mausoleum plans depict the building's elevations and site plan. (See Exhibit 17: Mausoleum Elevations, Exhibit 18: Mausoleum Cross-sections, Exhibit 19: Mausoleum Floor Plans - Dimensioned, Exhibit 20: Mausoleum Elevations — Dimensioned, and Exhibit 21: Mausoleum Cross-sections - Dimensioned). The building height ranges from 41 to 57 feet, is approximately 85,OOOsf in size, and could hold upwards of 6100 crypts and 2800 cremation niches. The upper, main entrance level provides access directly into the two-story Mausoleum Chapel from the south, and the lower level entrance on the north side enters directly into the lowest level of the Mausoleum. On two sides of the main building, wings of the Mausoleum are developed with open-air courtyards with crypts on three levels facing into the courts, and with lawn burials available within the courts at the ground level. Side entrances allow for access and views from and into the adjoining garden areas. In addition to stairs, an elevator will be located inside the air-conditioned space to provide access to all of the floors. The Mausoleum creates a transition that unites the upper and lower burial gardens. Garden Crypt buildings are placed adjacent to the lower level of the Mausoleum enclosing the adjacent garden lawn burial and mediating the scale of the Mausoleum's tallest elevation. This reinforces the horizontal emphasis established in the design of the overall site and strengthens the connection established between the built form and the landscape. This building will have minor amounts of accent and security lighting; the mechanical equipment will be ground-mounted and screened by landscaping. The applicant will review fire sprinkler coverage in the enclosed public areas with the Huntington Beach Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits. Typical Garden Crypts The same basic architectural elements from the Mausoleum are extended and incorporated into the Garden Crypts. The Garden Crypt buildings are low and one-story in profile, and their horizontality is emphasized. (See Exhibit 22: Garden Elevations) They are arranged to visually contain the perimeter, allowing minimal and controlled views into the cemetery, thus preserving its open space value to the neighborhood, without compromising the cemetery visitor's experience. The Garden Crypts form a nearly continuous wall that also creates an acoustical barrier from the neighborhood, and the adjacent street traffic. The edge to the adjacent neighbors is softened through the use of landscaped berms and plant materials between the garden crypts and the street frontage. The spaces between the buildings will consist of more intimate gardens, with smaller statues and niche spaces. The main elements of the Garden Crypts are a long breezeway-type corridor, with an open-air, canopy roof. (See Exhibit 23: Garden Crypt Elevations — Dimensioned) Crypts and niches occupy one side, forming a continuous wall, while the other side has groupings of crypts and niches, creating wide open areas that allow for views into the garden areas. Skylights with opaque glass in the roof are centered over the more closed portions of the corridors, providing a soft-light to the areas below. These buildings will have minimal security lighting, no fire sprinklers, and since they are open-air, no mechanical equipment. In total, up to 100,000sf of Garden Crypt buildings are proposed, with space for 10,000 crypts, and 6,000 niches. Garden Crypt/Maintenance Facility Phase I contains a special building that is a combination of a Garden Crypt structure and a Maintenance Facility. The Maintenance Facility/Garden Crypt plans depict the building's site plan and elevations. (See Exhibit 24: Maintenance Facility/Garden Crypt Elevations, Sections, and Floor Plans — Dimensioned) The Garden Crypt portion of the facility is one-story, 21 feet high and approximately 10,000sf in size in Phase I. It will provide spaces for 1000 caskets and 600 cremations. Typical of all of the Garden Crypts, it contains an internal open-air passage that is canopy-covered and punctuated periodically with skylights along its length. The Maintenance Facility portion of the structure is one-story, 18 feet high, and approximately 5700sf in size in Phase I and 4000sf in Phase II. The Maintenance Facility shares a common wall with the adjoining Garden Crypts. Due to the utilitarian nature of the Maintenance Facility, and the minimal views from the exterior, its architecture is clearly functional; the Garden Crypt side architecture matches the master plan style. The Facility's finished floor elevation will be several feet below the adjoining Garden Crypts, which will reduce the perceived height of the building. Garden Crypts will form two sides of the Facility's yard; the other side is an existing block wall ranging from 6' to 8' on the west side adjoining the service yard for the Hospital. A paved driveway leads to a gate; the interior courtyard area will be paved, and striped to provide eight parking stalls for the Cemetery's maintenance employees, including one handicap stall. The largest part of the Maintenance Facility may have up to six bays with roll-up doors to provide storage for machinery, equipment, and supplies. A smaller area will be constructed for an office, restrooms for employees and visitors, and a break area for employees. On one side, concrete slabs will be poured for roll-off trash dumpsters to be stored. Elsewhere, an aboveground 500-gallon tank will be installed for the storage and dispensing of diesel fuel oil. Only minor amounts of gasoline will stored on-site in 10-gallon containers. The applicant will obtain all approvals and permits for the storage of these substances from the appropriate agencies, including but not limited to the Huntington Beach Fire Department This building will have minor amounts of exterior convenience and security lighting, and fire sprinklers will be installed, if required. The Maintenance Facility's mechanical equipment will be ground-mounted, and located within the yard area. Note that only one of the ultimate Maintenance Facility buildings will be constructed with this Phase; the other building will be constructed during Phase II to support additional maintenance activities as the Cemetery expands. Private Mausoleums Private Mausoleums are smaller, free-standing structures for the interment of a direct family; typically, they contain less than eight crypts. As the name suggests, these structures are not built for pre-need inventory, but rather are built-to-suit per the family's direction. Most are simple, above-ground, pre- assembled, companion mausoleum crypts. (See Exhibit 25: Typical Companion Private Mausoleums) A few may be larger, with doors and interior conveniences such as an altar or bench. (See Exhibit 26: Typical Vestibule Private Mausoleums) Most will fit within a ten foot by ten foot by ten foot cube, with none to exceed 15 feet in height. As the areas around the main buildings are developed, spaces will be set aside for these minor buildings. Materials The building materials are selected for their permanence and low maintenance properties. There is an emphasis on integral rather than applied finishes. The buildings are primarily constructed of cast-in-place concrete, overlaid with veneer surfaces consisting primarily of polished and rough granite in natural, earth- toned hues, and textured architectural concrete similar in appearance to natural sandstone, with limited amounts of architectural metals and art glass. (See Exhibit 27: Building Materials and Colorboard) 4 PHASE I On-site Improvements Phase I is approximately 2 acres in size, and is located at the southwesterly corner of the expansion property, adjacent to the Hospital's service area and the existing Cemetery. The existing drainage course will be placed in a proposed 51" RCP pipe under the Maintenance Facility parking lot, connecting to the existing upstream 36" inlet from the Hospital service yard. The RCP pipe will drain to an enlarged and improved temporary detention area that then drains to the existing 36" inlet structure at Newman. Per the City's condition, the temporary detention basin will be sized to accommodate the existing historical (pre-1986 10-year event) storage, plus the amount required to handle the slightly increased runoff resulting from the hardening of the Phase I buildings and private roads. A detailed Hydrology and Hydraulic report will be submitted with this Phase to validate the sizing of the storm water systems. A small amount of private roads will be constructed during this phase, creating a loop from the existing Cemetery circulation system. New sewer, water, and electrical utilities will be extended to serve the facilities in this Phase. While the designs for these systems currently are in the conceptual stage, the goal is to minimize site impacts by potentially creating the existing electrical service area along the west boundary with the Hospital into the expansion area's utility service corridor. Buildings Maintenance Facility/Garden Crypts As noted above, the only building anticipated during this phase is the 15,700sf Garden Crypt/Maintenance Facility. Off-Site Improvement Talbert The majority of the project's off-site improvements , including sections of new fencing, will be constructed during Phase I. (See Exhibit 28: Perimeter Elevations) Starting with the Talbert frontage, the existing Main Entrance is proposed to be enhanced, with new monument signage and landscaping, consisting of stone and brick walls, with raised individual metal lettering. (See Exhibit 29: New Talbert Entrance Elevation) In addition, handicap landings and an extension of the sidewalk into the property will be constructed. (See Exhibit 30: Main Entrance Plan) The existing wrought-iron and split-face block pilaster fence along Talbert will remain as is. Additional trees will be planted within 20' inside of the perimeter fence along Talbert in the few uncommitted grave sites adjacent to the street; the new trees, together with the existing trees, will meet the City's requirements of a tree every 45 linear feet. Closer to Beach, the existing 5' block wall will be replaced with a new 6' block wall, with minor sections of the same wrought-iron fencing. In front of the existing Garden Crypt structure, the existing bollards will be encased in an extension of the new 6' block wall. Along the entire stretch of Talbert, the existing asphalt curb, gutter, and sidewalk will be removed and replaced with concrete. Due to the existing on-site interments, the public road right-of-way cannot be expanded. To accommodate the six-foot sidewalk, the curb will be relocated approximately two feet towards the street, reducing the existing traffic lanes to 11', with a five foot bicycle lane. (See Exhibit 33: Talbert Cross-section) The existing single electrical pole serving the Garden Crypts will be removed, and the service will be undergrounded. In addition, several streetlights will be installed along the Cemetery's Talbert frontage. Beach Along Beach, the existing chain link fence and low block wall will be removed and replaced with the same type of alternating open wrought-iron and block wall sections as proposed for Talbert. (See Exhibit 32: Typical New Talbert and Beach Perimeter Fencing and Monument Signage) The alternating sections provide security, yet also allow for screened views into the Cemetery, as well as reducing the volume of traffic noise inside the Cemetery. A few new trees will be installed inside the perimeter closer to the Beach/Talbert intersection; together with the numerous existing trees, the new trees will meet the City's requirements.The existing asphalt curb and gutter and 8' dirt sidewalk will be replaced with concrete curb, gutters, and sidewalks. The existing bus shelter will be protected in place. Beach/Talbert Intersection The existing northeast quadrant of the Beach/Talbert intersection will be removed and replaced with new concrete curb, gutters, handicap landings and sidewalks, and new traffic signal poles and related control systems. In addition to City review, the project will also require the approval of Caltrans. The existing wrought-iron gates and block wall will be removed and replaced with new corner monument signage. The new signage consists of a series of wrought-iron fences, and block planters and walls of various heights, up to 6'. tall, with the same raised metal individual lettering. (See again Exhibit 32: Beach & Talbert Monument Signage) The entrance will be backgrounded by a 17 foot tall wall, with an incised cross. PHASE II On-site improvements Phase II is approximately 4.5 acres in size, and is located at the northwesterly corner of the expansion property, adjacent to the 'Hospital's service area and Newman Avenue. The existing drainage course will be placed in a proposed 51" RCP pipe, connecting to the existing upstream 51" RCP pipe installed under the Maintenance Facility. The stormwaters will then flow to a permanent on-site detention basin, which will drain to the existing 36" inlet structure. The detention basin will be constructed of concrete vertical walls, and a soft, non landscaped bottom. The walls will be higher than the surrounding topography, constructed with form liners on the outside surfaces to create the appearance of stacked stones. For maintenance purposes, the basin will be accessed via a locked driveway off Newman. In addition to the permanent improvements to the west-side drainage channel, the storage capacity of the east-side drainage course will be enlarged and improved, created by expanding the existing stormwater ponding area. The stormwaters will flow into the temporary detention basin, and then to the existing 48"-inlet structure.Per the City's condition, both the permanent west-side detention basin, and the east-side temporary basin, will be sized to accommodate the existing historical (pre-1986 10-year event) storage, plus the amount required to handle the slightly increased runoff resulting from the 'hardening' of the Phase II buildings and private roads. A detailed.Hydrology and Hydraulic report will be submitted with this Phase to validate the sizing of the storm water systems. A small amount of private roads will be constructed during this phase, creating a loop from the existing Cemetery circulation system. New sewer, water, and electrical utilities will be extended to serve the facilities in this Phase; the designs for these systems currently are in the conceptual stage. Buildings Garden Crypts Phase II envisions the construction of additional Garden Crypt inventory, and the Mausoleum. Approximately 30,OOOsf of Garden Crypt structures are anticipated during this Phase, holding 3000 crypts and 1800 niches The exterior fagade will consist of exposed integrally colored concrete, screened from view from the outside by a combination of landscaped berms, shrubs, and trees. An additional 4000sf Maintenance Facility expansion may also be constructed at this time. Mausoleum Phase II includes the construction of the main Mausoleum. While it is anticipated that the entire Mausoleum will be constructed at one time, it is designed so that it can be constructed in sub-phases, per the demands of the market. Off-site improvements Along Newman, the proposed Garden Crypts will create most of the property's exterior, together with a 20 foot bermed and landscaped setback. The existing chain link fence will be removed and, in the small areas between the buildings and the detention areas, replaced with the same type of alternating open wrought-iron and block wall sections as proposed for Talbert. The alternating sections provide security, yet also allow for screened views into the Cemetery, as well as reducing the volume of traffic noise inside the Cemetery. New trees will be installed along Newman to meet the City's requirements. The existing. curb, gutter, and sidewalk will be replaced with new concrete curb, gutters, and sidewalks. In addition new streetlights will be installed along the Newman frontage PHASE III On-site improvements Phase II is approximately 6 acres in size, and is located at the easterly side of the expansion property, adjacent to the Tamarack Village townhomes, the Healthcare Center, and Newman Avenue. The existing drainage course will be placed in a proposed 54" RCP pipe, connecting to the existing upstream 54" RCP pipe installed under the Church parking lot. The stormwaters will then flow to an on-site detention basin, which will drain to the existing 48" inlet structure. Similar to the Phase II structure, the detention basin will be constructed of concrete vertical walls, and a soft, non-landscaped bottom. The walls will be higher than the surrounding topography, constructed with form liners on the outside surfaces to create the appearance of stacked stones. For maintenance purposes, the basin will be accessed via a locked driveway off Newman. Buildings Garden Crypts Phase III envisions the buildout of additional Garden Crypt inventory, and the Mausoleum. The Garden Crypts are arranged in clusters around the edge of the property, creating an internal garden environment. Approximately 60,OOOsf of Garden Crypt structures are anticipated during this Phase, with 6000 crypts and 3600 niches .A71$ `may {fig'F N y G .?�uia,�.�'. ,�a�, ,a„.. a .;.,;-: -.: ,_...,,r�-��rx»; •. ..;:�' _ zF.. �44..�n33�a;; " r',:_ - DIOCESE OF ORANGE j'rvCA OFFICE OF CONSTRUCTION ` ° 4 itiOV I i�: rj MANAGEMENT SERVICES r hftp://www.inovoa.CcD-rcbo.org/ MARYWOOD CENTER P. O. Box 14195 2811 E.VILLA REAL DR. ORANGE, CA.92863-1595 (714)282-3012 FAX: (714)282-3124 hftp://www.rcbo.org/ November 19, 2004 City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Appeal of Planning Commission Action, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 Good Shepherd Cemetery - Dear City Clerk: The purpose of this letter is to formally Appeal the Planning Commission's actions at their November 9, 2004 meeting, wherein they approved the above subject Mitigated Negative Declaration (Neg. Dec.). The Diocese of Orange, at 2811 Villa Real, Orange, CA., the owner and operator of the Good Shepherd Cemetery, is the proponent of the project and the appellant. The Diocese is requesting this Appeal for several reasons, the primary one being that the Diocese disagrees with portions of the final Neg. Dec. Report, and was not allowed to make a full presentation on key pertinent master planning issues at the November 9, 2004 Planning Commission meeting, apparently because the related imposed Neg. Dec. Findings and Development Requirements were deemed to be"Code-related" and not subject to the review of the Planning Commission. It is our contention that the issues in question are not Code-related, and should have been contained in the Conditional Use Permit Staff Report, and open for discussion. We know that several items have been drafted and modified during the four years that this project has been in review at the City, so we are not convinced that these items have been officially codified into the City's Codes. By separate letter (attached) we have requested that the City Attorney review whether these items are within the purview of the Planning Commission's approval. Please note that this Appeal has been submitted in order to retain future rights, and is limited to the above subject Mitigated Neg. Dec. approval. In as much as the other portion of the project's proposal, the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 00-63, has not yet been approved and has been continued to a special meeting to be held December 7, 2004, the Diocese respectfully requests that the processing of this Appeal of the Neg. Dec. be placed 'on hold', until after the Planning Commission's final action on the CUP. • Page 2 November 19,2004 Please find attached the required check in the amount of$2,335.00 If ave any questions, please contact me at 714-282-3012. ince ely, Joe voa, Direc r of Const ction, Diocese of Orange Cc: Howard Zelefsky,Director of Planning Scott Hess,Planning Manager Herb Fauland,Principal Planner Paul Da Veiga,Associate Planner Leonie Mulvihill, City Legal Counsel Tern Elliott,Public Works JN/df DIOCESE OF ORANGE OFFICE OF CONSTRUCTION ,,~>o' MANAGEMENT SERVICES /!A_ hftp://www.Onovoa.Co�rcbo.org MARYWOOD CENTER , , , P. O. Box 14195 281.1 E.VILLA REAL DR. ORANGE, CA. 92863-1595 (714)282-3012 FAX: (714)282-3124 http://www.rcbo.org/ November 19, 2004 Chair Ron Davis Planning Commission City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08, Good Shepherd Cemetery Request for Clarification Dear Mr. Davis: The purpose of this letter is to request clarification of the Planning Commission's actions taken on the above subject Negative Declaration on November 9, 2004. It must be noted at the outset that the cemetery business is unique and not like most commercial ventures, and in light of recognizing these differences, the Diocese simply requests what is fair and equitable. At the November 9`h meeting, the Diocese began to address positions in the text and a few of the Mitigation Measures in the Negative Declaration that we did not agree with.z We were not allowed to make our full presentation on our positions on key pertinent master._:planning design issues apparently because the related imposed Negative Declaration 'Conditions' and Development Requirements were deemed to be "Code related" and not subject to the review of the Planning Commission as indicated by City staff. If these items were not under the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, then why was the Planning Commission asked to approve these items without hearing our position on various items that are, in our opinion, not code related issues? It is our contention that the following items below are not "Code related" and should have been contained in the Conditional Use Permit Staff Report, and open for public discussion. We have listed the main items of our concern and included our proposed amendments as follows (as referenced in the November 2, 2004 correspondence regarding Development and Use Requirements): 1. Item 1.c., Storm Drain Pipe Design: We propose that the system be allowed to utilize the on-site drainage systems towards providing detention capacity; this is an industry-wide standard alternate accepted by other governmental agencies, and we propose the following revision: "Furthermore, the proposed on-site drainage system will net be permitted to provide any required detention capacity unless it is demonstrated in the final hydrology and hydraulics study that the retained storm water in the pipe(s) would net negatively impact the existing upstream or private properties or cause flooding onto Talbert Avenue." • Page 2 NoveV'"{sr 19,2004 2. Iterdl.c., Detention Basin Design: We propose that the detention basins be constructed with concrete vertical walls instead of earthen 5:1 slopes. The rationale for the 5:1 slopes is unclear, since the City does not have a set of detention basin specifications. The Cemetery is confident that it can design and construct a vertical wall facility that will meet all of the City's operational requirements. The Cemetery's proposed design will make maintenance easier. Instead of utilizing a backhoe to scrape large sloped grass areas clean of debris and silt deposits, the Cemetery's design will concentrate the debris and silt, and will provide easier access, which will allow for more efficient maintenance clearing with a front-end loader. The Cemetery's design is more sensitive to its surroundings. The Cemetery proposes to encircle the basins with a secure wall, which will then be heavily screened with landscaping, which allows for the noisy and visually obtrusive maintenance activities to occur behind a visual and acoustical barrier, and thus have less impact on the somber and sacred Catholic religious practices. The Cemetery's proposed design is also a more efficient use of the land. The City's design, which is a frustum, utilizes 50% more private property than the Cemetery's design. Other developments can find dual use for temporary detention basins; however, basins in a cemetery cannot have such dual use because interments are never made in an area that is subject to flooding (except in New Orleans.) In as much as over 85% of the Cemetery will be landscaped, there is no need to encumber any remaining valuable land for an indeterminate period of time for slope areas that cannot be utilized in any fashion because they may be underwater for a few short days a year. The Cemetery's revised language follows: "Slopes within the earthen detention areas s#ali RE)t can be steeper than 5:1 maximum vertical." 3. Item 1.c, Detention.Basin Freeboard: Please provide clarification for the following statement: "Additionally, the proposed on-site detention basins shall be designed to maintain 1-ft. minimum freeboard (measured from the top of the respective detention basin)during the 100- year storm event." 4. Item 1.c., Storm Drain System Maintenance: The Cemetery respectfully requests that the Public Works Department be consistent with its past practices, and continue its maintenance of the existing native water course, and accept responsibility for any portion of the facilities that are constructed per the City's Master Plan of drainage, including a vertical wall detention basin. In as much as the improvements to the Cemetery are anticipated to be phased, the Cemetery expects the City to assume responsibilities as each portion of the improvements consistent with the City's Master Plan is completed. Therefore, the Cemetery proposes that the entire following paragraph be deleted: • Page 3 :�lovember 19,2004 6. Item 1.e., Existing Storm Drain System: The Cemetery requests that the City accept maintenance of the existing 36" pipe from Talbert be accepted by the City, in the event that the pipe is shown to be sound. The Cemetery therefore proposes the following revised language: "Additionally, any portion of this pipe that is currently located beneath the existing mausoleum and is shown to be in a sound working condition shall not be re-aligned..." , and- 6. Items 4.a.2., 4.a.5., 4.s., and 41, Fire Sprinklers: Throughout the various reports and findings, there are conflicting conditions regarding the installation of fire sprinklers. Some of the requirements appear to be mandatory, while others, such as 4.a.5. are conditional (i.e. '...if required...'). The Cemetery's position is that each building will undergo a separate review by the Fire Department, and if required, fire sprinklers will be installed. At the present time, the Cemetery anticipates the possible installation of a fire sprinkler system in the maintenance portion of the Maintenance/Garden Crypt building in Phase I, but not in the Garden Crypts or the Mausoleum. The Cemetery therefore requests the following revisions: Item 4.a.2.: "Construct private on-site water system to provide domestic and fire service, required, to the proposed maintenance building(s) and mausoleum." Item 4.s.: "An automatic fire sprinkler system will be installed throughout. in those facilities requirinq such a system." Item 41: "A Class II wet standpipe shall be installed._in those facilities requiring such a system." 7. Item 4.a.6., On-Site Irrigation Water Well: The Cemetery respectfully disagrees with the City's requirement to abandon its existing well if it switches to City water in the future. The Cemetery recently completed an extensive rehabilitation of the well, and replacement of the pump and pump control systems, and expects them to be utilized for several decades hence;"this upgrade was sized to handle the build-out of the Cemetery's grounds. The only extenuating circumstance that may occur that would cause the Cemetery to request City water would be if the Cemetery's water supply was impacted by circumstances out of its control, such as seawater intrusion into its aquifer. Because well drilling and pump placement is capital intensive, the Cemetery requests that the well and pump systems be allowed to remain in-place after being disconnected, in the event that the water supply under the Cemetery returns to a usable condition. The Cemetery requests the following changes: A separate irrigation water service, meter, and backflow prevention device may be installed to serve the existing and future irrigation system(s) pmvided that the appliGaRt properly abandGRS the GR Site Well • Page 4 November 19,2004 8. Item 4.c., Tree Report: Because the Cemetery already has a significant number of trees on-site, the Cemetery requests that the required report on existing trees be limited to those impacted by construction, and requests the following revision: "Prior to the submittal of a landscape plan, the applicant shall provide a Consulting Arborist report on all the existing trees impacted by construction, if an With this letter, we are requesting that the City Attorney's.Office review whether or not these items are within the Planning Commission's jurisdiction. In order to maintain all of our rights, we are anticipating filing a formal Appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of the project's Mitigated Negative Declaration. However, we will request that this Appeal not be submitted to the City Council until after the Planning Commission's final actions on the project's remaining Conditional Use Permit approval items. As a final separate item, we are preparing the additional exhibits and submittals regarding the architectural issues that were raised at the November 9 h meeting for presentation at the special meeting scheduled for December 7, 2004. As always, if you have any questions, or if I can be of any other assistance, please contact me at 714-282-3012. ,Resp ctfully U Joe ovoa Direc or of Con ruction, Diocese of Orange Cc: Howard Zelefsky,Director of Planning Scott Hess,Planning Manager Herb Fauland, Principle Planner Paul Da Veiga,Planner Leone Mulvihill,Legal Counsel Terri Elliot Public Works JN/df ATTACHMENT 7 GOOD SHEPHERD CEMETERY EXPANSION APPEAL OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO . 03-08 APPLICANT / APPELLANT : MICHAEL PADIAN ' LOCATION : 8301 TALBERTAVENUE FEBRUARY 22 , 2005 L ocA TION AND SURROUNDINGS LOCATION • N / E / C OF BEACH BLVD . AND TALBERT AVE . SURROUNDINGS • NORTH - RESIDENTIAL/ CHURCH • SOUTH ,, COMMERCIAL (WAL,-MART) • EAST ,--- RESIDENTIAL • WEST ,.- HOSPITAL/ COMMERCIAL AERIAL MAP P211, SUBJECT SITE � �¢ - �. ,�,...�� 'a`•-a. 33 ....y �£� «.,r It ... �y e.t�7 � F E y � y I H / i _ t 051 77 Rt W AN IF MR rA �:.s»-� '� 'M�— �c ram'. � � �,a, c a �' n� �: /s � `'�y ? ', •� y PROJECTPROPOSAL MND No ,, 03wO8 ANALYZES THE PHASED CONSTRUCTION OF: • 859000 SQ . FT. - MAUSOLEUM • 109000 SQ . FT. - MAINTENANCE FACILITY • '1 00 , 000 ';rz3,%om4% ,, FT. - GARDEN CRYPT BUILDINGS • 1 , 857 LINEAL. FEET OF PERIMETER FENCING PRojEcrHisTORY PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS: ,l- , • 1 1 / 9 / 04 - MND APPROVED / CUP CONTINUED TO 12 / 7 / 04 • 1 1 / 19 / 04 - MND APPEALED BY APPLICANT • 12 / 7 / 04 - CUP APPROVED - No APPEAL FILED APPEAL REASONS FOR APPEAL : I � • MITIGATION MEASURE REQUIRES DETENTION BASINS WITH 5 TO 'I SLOPE RATIO WI EARTHEN SLOPES • 5 TO I SLOPE REQUIREMENT RESULTS IN MORE LAND AREA • APPLICANT' S DESIGN PROPOSES VERTICAL CONCRETE WALLS NEWMAN AVE. FRoNTA CCU' (LOOKING SOUTH) r r a-z �� •Ti' � 5tk` 3 . 3 � u�fa�r z��# � � �dr ��' 'T ?• ip, t.e., yy��� w_�'0 3:.##'' X' �. y.: �i �eg- ��S•k( bs '�Y ONE ,�a s' x "� J'� . "'• ` g` ��� -3 M � wN' 3 SC 1 T � y }/P UNDEVELOPEDSITE (LOOKING NORTH) m E. E I M". 4 f \ k \ ma j(( '�•ram - X � e k :`A�' ISSUES: DrrENrION BASIN DESIGN A COMPROMISE DESIGN SOLUTION INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING : • Z TO 'I EARTHEN SLOPES IN THE SAME GENERAL LOGAT"ION AS THE, APPLICANT'S ORIGINAL PROPOSAL • 'I O"FOOT SETBACK TO THE PROPERTY LINE • WROUGHT IRON VIEW FEhICINC STAFF RECOMMENDATION RECOMMEND APPROVAL BASED ON: • THE PROPOSED DESIGN MITIGATES POTENTIAL DRAINAGE IMPACTS • 2 TO I SLOPES ARE ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY AND APPLICANT • DESIGN OF THE DETENTION BASINS WILL BE CONSISTENT VYITH THE FINDINGS OF THE MIND & CUP & WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDINGS RCA ROUTING SHEET INITIATING DEPARTMENT: Planning SUBJECT: Appeal of Mitigated Negative Declaration NO. 03-08 (Good Shepherd Cemetery) COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 22, 2005 RCA ATTACHMENTS STATUS Ordinance (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Resolution (w/exhibits & legislative draft if applicable) Not Applicable Tract Map, Location Map and/or other Exhibits Not Applicable Contract/Agreement (w/exhibits if applicable) (Signed in full by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Subleases, Third Party Agreements, etc. (Approved as to form by City Attorney) Not Applicable Certificates of Insurance (Approved by the City Attorney) Not Applicable Financial Impact Statement (Unbudget, over $5,000) Not Applicable Bonds (If applicable) Not Applicable Staff Report (If applicable) Attached Commission, Board or Committee Report (If applicable) Not Applicable Findings/Conditions for Approval and/or Denial Attached EXPLANATION FOR MISSING ATTACHMENTS REVIEWED RETURNED FORWARDED Administrative Staff ( ) ( ) Assistant City Administrator (initial) ( ) ( ) City Administrator (Initial) City Clerk ( ) EXPLANATION FOR RETURN OF ITEM: Only)(Below Space For City Clerk's Use RCA Author: HZ:SH:PD:rl Page 1 of 3 Ehring, Liz From: Dapkus, Pat Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:29 PM To: Ehring, Liz Subject: FW: Good Shepherd Cemetery Appeal Hearing FYI d c -----Original Message----- From: Dapkus, Pat _ Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:29 PM 1 To: Flynn, Joan; Zelefsky, Howard; Emery, Paul cr' Subject: FW: Good Shepherd Cemetery Appeal Hearing rrl FYI ry -----Original Message----- From: padianteam@aol.com [mailto:padianteam@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:12 PM To: City.Council@surfcity-hb.org Cc: Pat Dapkus; Cathy Fikes Subject: Good Shepherd Cemetery Appeal Hearing Dear Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers, On behalf of the Diocese of Orange, Owner and Operator of the Good Shepherd Cemetery, located at the corner of Beach and Talbert, we extend an offer to make ourselves available to you to discuss the reasons for our Appeal of the Planning Commission's Approval of the Good Shepherd Negative Declaration, and the reasons for our several requests for Continuance to next Monday's, March 21, 2005, City Council meeting. The Conditional Use Permit application for the expansion of the Good Shepherd Cemetery was originally submitted back in September 2000. While there have been numerous issues regarding this project, the primary cause for the extremely extended entitlement processing duration centers around the disposition of storm waters which are temporarily stored in the Cemetery's expansion area. In summary, the problem with the storm waters has always been the result of off-site issues, and not with the Cemetery itself. Early on, the Cemetery was able to identify that the reason for the waters being stored on its property was due to downstream development in the 1950's and 1960's that filled in an existing pond, and installed what is now recognized as woefully inadequate storm drain pipes; the result was in effect, a dam, that pushed the waters upstream onto the Cemetery's property. In addition, almost all of the water was coming from upstream public sources off areas that had been significantly hardened over the years. The waters are only detained during significant rain events, and are typically stored for only a few hours, until the storm runoff peak has passed. The City's original requirement for dealing with the issue was a small paragraph without much detail. At first, the Cemetery proposed to proceed with a development program that would avoid the storm water storage areas until a later date. But upon further review, the Cemetery decided that proper planning of the buildout of the property could not take place until this issue was resolved. As with any land development project, the key concern has been how much property would be needed to handle the storm water situation, which is not related to the property's 3/16/2005 Page 2 of 3 approved use. For a while, the City required the Cemetery to construct an extremely large 2-acre basin, that would take care of the City's downstream flooding problems. The Cemetery argued against such a proposal, indicating that there was no nexus between the City's request and the Cemetery's development. The Cemetery indicated that they would be willing to allow the City to utilize its property on a temporary basis (ten years), with the City paying its fair-share of the construction costs, and execution of a Development Agreement. Note that these basins do not show up on any of the City's Master Plans of Drainage. After much review, the City staff decided that it could not force the Cemetery to construct such a large facility, but also could not commit to a deadline for taking care of its downstream problems; nor was the City willing to fund any of the costs. Instead, the City reduced its storage requirements down to the amount that has been stored on-site since the Cemetery acquired the property in the 1960's. After this finding, the Cemetery retained new land planners and architects, and revised the plans for the buildout of the property. Among other improvements, the Cemetery proposed the construction of vertical-walled temporary basins, with significant fencing and landscaping screening. For the longest time, the City staff rejected the vertical-wall solution, with very little reasoning. The City Planning Commission in November 2004, approved a Negative Declaration that called for 5:1 slopes for the basins, which significantly increased their size (by almost 50%) over the vertical wall design. The Cemetery appealed this decision. In an effort to resolve the differences, in a meeting in December 2004, Public Works proposed a compromise of 2:1 slopes, with the edge starting at the right-of-way line in an effort to partially mitigate the increase of land taken for the basins. After reviewing the merits, the Cemetery agreed in January 2005 to the Public Works proposal. Unfortunately, while we were able to gain concurrence with Public Works, Planning has indicated that they cannot support the compromise proposal because an extremely small portion of the basins would be located in the setback zone. In conclusion, the Cemetery requests that the City Council approve either the Cemetery's original vertical wall solution, or the 2:1 slope approach, provided that the edge of the basin is located at the right-of-way line. The reason for placing the basin at the right-of-way line is simple: an attempt to minimize the taking of land for what the City has recognized as a temporary situation. Unfortunately, since the City has no funding program in place or even planned to eliminate these basins, the Cemetery has had to consider the basins to be permanent encumbrances. The Cemetery believes that it has already shown its good faith and willingness to be a good neighbor and member of the Huntington Beach community by agreeing to take care of what is really the City's problems, by funding the construction of temporary facilities and suffering the land taking associated with the basins. The existing Cemetery is over 90% occupied, and additional space is urgently needed to support the needs of the vibrant and growing Catholic community in westerly Orange County. The Cemetery's latest proposal is an attempt to find a fair, reasonable, and equitable resolution of the issues in light of the circumstances. We are hopeful that we can find a time when we can meet in advance of next Monday's City Council meeting. In addition to numerous exhibits, we would also like for you to see a very detailed model of the Cemetery's proposed expansion. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 949-370-9778, or reply to this email. Respectfully, Mike Padian Padian Team Consulting, Consultant to the Diocese of Orange 3/16/2005 CS) D I O C E S E O F O RANG E Corsaucb Managema tseMces 1 — P\e'�� MARVWOOD CENTER A- P.O.Box 14195 28+1-E:VfttA-REAL DFiNE ORANGE,CA.92863-1595 — (714)282-3012 FAX:(714)282-=4 T_ iv _C March 2,2005 0 Mr.Paul Da Veiga Principal Planner City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street CO o r=.: Huntington Beach,CA 92688 r-q.;U RE:Negative Declaration,City.CounciLAppeal;.Good.Shepherd Cemetery C-) Dear Mr.Da Veiga: U t C Co D The purpose of this letter is to formally request a continuance of the Negative Declaration Appeal Hearing for the Good Shepherd Cemetery expansion project,that was on agenda for the March 7, 2005 City Council meeting. In as much as we.just received the Staffs final report for the Appeal Hearing of the project,as well as the latest Design and Use Requirements,we are requesting the continuance in order to have the opportunity to review the final comments, and so we may meet with City Staff to resolve several outstanding differences, We request that this project be continued until the CVs next meeting,scheduled for March 21,2005; we believe that by requesting this continuance we are not impacting any time limits associated with the projects overall approval. If you have any questions,please contact me at 714-282-3012 r Respectfully, Qoug zer Assistant to Joe Novoa Signing for Joe Novoa Director of Construction Management Services Diocese of Orange CC: Mike Wesner Mike Padian Jack Fleming DLOC. ESE OF ORANGE OFFICE OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES http:ltwww.inovoa. rcbo.org/ MARYWOOD CENTER P. O.BOX 14195 2811 E.ViLLA REat.DR. ORANGE,CA.92863-1595 (7T4Y282=3012- FAX:(714)282-3124 http/twww:rcbo.OM/ February 22,2005 Mr.Paul Da Viega Fs*sicipai Planner City of Huntington Beach 200 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA RE:Negative Declaration City Council Appeal;Good Shepherd Cemetery Dear Mr.Da Viega The purpose of this letter is to formally request a continuance of the Negative Declaration Appeal Hearing for the Good Shepherd Cemetery expansion project,that was on agenda for tonight's, February 22n0,2005, City Council meeting. In.as much as we have.yet.to.receive the Stafrs final report for the Appeal Hearing.of the project, we are requesting the continuance in order to have the opportunity to review the final comments. In particular,in cider to fully analyze the Cit)'s positions,we are also requesting that we receive the final Staff report containing the final revised Design and Use Requirements from the City's Public Worts Department along with the Appeal Hearing Staff report. We request that.this pro*tba continued until the City's next meeting In March, 2005, provided that we receive the aforementioned documents in a timely manner,and none of the Appeal time limits are exceeded. If you have any questions,please contact me at 714-282-3012. Respectfully, t� Doug Fisher Assistant to Joe Novoa Signing for Joe Novoa Director of Construction Management Services Diocese of Orange cc. Mike Wesner M#m Padian Jack Flaming t7Z/ZZ/Zt1Un li:1'j (14-zbz-diLy ViUULbE OF URANGE PAGE 02 D. I. O.. C..E_.E. E. Q. F O R A R_C.E... OFFICE OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES httpJhvww.inovoa.arcbo.oM// MARYWOOD CENTER P.O.BOX 14195 2811 E.VILLA REAL DR. ORANGE,CA.92863-1$96 (7T4j 282:3012 FAX:(714)282-3124 http:/twww:rcbo:oroi February 22,2005 Mr.Paul Da Viega A� Rafsisipel Planner City of Huntington Beach 200 Main Street Huntington Beach,CA RE:Negative Declaration City.Council Appeal;Good Shepherd Cemetery Dear Mr.Da Viega The purpose of this letter is to formally.request a continuance of the Negative Declaration Appeal Hearing for the Good Shepherd Cemetery expansion project, that was on agenda for tonight's, February 22n0, 2005, City Council meeting. In.as much as we have.yet.to-receive.the Staffs,final report for the Appeal Hearing.of the project, we are requesting the.continuance in order to have the opportunity to review the final comments. In particular, in order to fully analyze the City's positions.we are also requesting that we receive the final Staff report containing the final revised Design and Use Requirements from the City's Public Works Department, along with the Appeal Hearing Staff report. We request that.this project ba.contlnued.until the.City's next meeting.)n March,.2005,.provided that we receive the aforementioned documents in a timely manner,and none of the Appeal time limits are exceeded. If you have any questions,please contact meat 714-282-3012. �Respectfully, Doug Fisher Assistant to Joe Novoa Signing for Joe Novoa Director of Constriiction Management Services Diocese of Orange CC: Mike Wesner Mike Padian Jack Fleming NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, February 22, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 04-02/GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 04-02 (BEACH BOULEVARD RESIDENTIAL): Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Property Owner: Various Request: ND: To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed project. GPA: To amend the General Plan land use designation to match the current zoning designation for three areas along Beach Boulevard as follows: Area A—Amend from CG-F2-a-d (Commercial General — Maximum Floor-Area-Ratio of 0.50—Auto District Overlay— Design Overlay) to RMH-25 (Residential Medium High Density— Maximum 25 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre) or RM-15 (Residential Medium Density— Maximum 15 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre) for properties along portions of Stark Ave., Holt Ave., MacDonald Ave., Glencoe Ave., and Alhambra Ave., west of Beach Blvd. Area B—Amend from CG-F2-a-d (Commercial General — Maximum Floor-Area-Ratio of 0.50—Auto District Overlay— Design Overlay) to RM-15 (Residential Medium Density— Maximum 15 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre) for properties south of Terry Drive, east of Viewpoint Lane, and along Moonshadow Circle. Area C—Amend from CG-F2-a-d (Commercial General —Maximum Floor-Area-Ratio of 0.50—Auto District Overlay— Design Overlay) to RM-15 (Residential Medium Density— Maximum 15 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre) for properties along portions of A Street and B Street, south of Warner Ave. and north of Blaylock Drive. Project Planner: Ricky Ramos 2. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08 (GOOD SHEPHERD CEMETERY) Appellant/Applicant: Mike Padian Request: To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with a proposed expansion of Good Shepherd Cemetery. The expansion includes three phases of construction over a seven to ten year period. The proposed improvements consist of an 85,000 square foot three-story mausoleum, a 10;000 square foot maintenance facility, one-story garden crypt buildings totaling 100,000 square feet, and construction of approximately 1,850 lineal feet of 06fimeter fencing. Location: 8301 Talbert Avenue (northeast corner of Beach INvd. arid Talbert Ave.) Project Planner: Paul Da Veiga GALEGAMCOUNCIU05\050222.DOC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the initial environmental assessment for Item Nos. 1 and 2 were processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item No. 1 would not have any significant environmental effect and, therefore, a negative declaration is warranted. It was determined that Item No. 2, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Negative Declaration No. 04-02 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday February 17, 2005. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited tc attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at; or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 GA.l:GAi.S\COUNCIL\05\050222.DOC NOTICE OF APPEAL TO PLAN-KING COMMISSION ACTION OF 610 Date of Planning Commission Action b TO: Planning Dept. (2 copies) DATE: —�oo Ci 1 h'Attorney ( copy) FILED BY: REGARDING: Tentative Date for Public Hearing: Copy of Appeal Letter attached. LEGAL NOTICE AND A.P.MAILING LIST MUST BE RECEIVED IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE Joan L. Flynn 1 a`� City Clerk X5227 Fee Collected �"�� DIOCESE OF ORANGE OFFICE OF CONSTRUCTION , " �: V. C1 MANAGEMENT SERVICES a`/ http://www.jnovoa.(a�-rcbo.org/ )✓ I� MARYWOOD CENTER MUM P.O. Box 14195 2811 E.VILLA REAL DR. ORANGE,CA-92863-1595 (714)282-3012 FAX: (714)282-3124 t http://www.rcbo.o[g Q�9 November 19, 2004 City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street Huntington Beach, CA 92648 RE: Appeal of Planning Commission Action, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 Good Shepherd Cemetery Dear City Clerk: The purpose of this letter is to formally Appeal the Planning Commission's actions at their November 9, 2004 meeting, wherein they approved the above subject Mitigated Negative Declaration (Neg. Dec.). The Diocese of Orange, at 2811 Villa Real, Orange, CA., the owner and operator of the Good Shepherd Cemetery, is the proponent of the project and the appellant. The Diocese is requesting this Appeal for several reasons, the primary one being that the Diocese disagrees with portions of the final Neg. Dec. Report, and was not allowed to make a full presentation on key pertinent master planning issues at,the November 9, 2004 Planning Commission meeting, apparently because the related imposed Neg. Dec.'Findings and Development Requirements were deemed to be"Code-related" and not subject to the review of the Planning Commission. It is our contention that the issues in question are not Code-related, and should have been contained in the Conditional Use Permit Staff Report, and open for discussion. We know that several items have been drafted and modified during the four years that this project has been in review at the City, so we are not convinced that these items have been officially codified into the City's Codes. By separate letter (attached) we have requested that the City Attorney review whether these items are within the purview of the Planning Commission's approval. Please note that this Appeal has been submitted in order to retain future rights, and is limited to the above subject Mitigated Neg. Dec. approval. In as much as the other portion of the project's proposal, the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 00-63, has not yet been approved and has been continued to a special meeting to be held December 7, 2004, the Diocese respectfully requests that the processing of this Appeal of the Neg. Dec. be placed 'on hold', until after the Planning Commission's final action on the CUP. • Page 2 November 19,2004 Please find attached the required check in the amount of$2,335.00 ITe ny questions, please contact me at 714-282-3012. c��'�� Jnst action, Diocese of Orange d Zelefsky, Director of Planning Scott Hess,Planning Manager Herb Fauland, Principal Planner Paul Da Veiga,Associate Planner Leonie Mulvihill, City Legal Counsel Terri Elliott,Public Works JN/df 1 Tj MEETING DATE: February 22, 2005 DEPARTMENT RECEIVED SUBJECT: REQUESTING: DATE Planning 2/3/05 Negative Declaration No. 04-02 / General Plan Amendment No. 04-02 (Beach Blvd. Residential) Planning 2/3/05 Appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 (Good SheperdCemetery) TODAY'S DATE February 4, 2005 VERIFIED BY ADMININSTRATION: APPROVED BY: Robert F. Beardsely Acting City Administrator 2/4/2005 8:55 AM NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, February 22, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the following planning and zoning items: ❑ 1. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 04-02/GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 04-02 (BEACH BOULEVARD RESIDENTIAL): Applicant: City of Huntington Beach Property Owner: Various Request: ND: To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed project. GPA: To amend the General Plan land use designation to match the current zoning designation for three areas along Beach Boulevard as follows: Area A—Amend from CG-F2-a-d (Commercial General — Maximum Floor-Area-Ratio of 0.50 —Auto District Overlay— Design Overlay) to RMH-25 (Residential Medium High Density— Maximum 25 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre) or RM-15 (Residential Medium Density— Maximum 15 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre) for properties along portions of Stark Ave., Holt Ave., MacDonald Ave., Glencoe Ave., and Alhambra Ave., west of Beach Blvd. Area B—Amend from CG-F2-a-d (Commercial General —Maximum Floor-Area-Ratio of 0.50 —Auto District Overlay— Design Overlay) to RM-15 (Residential Medium Density— Maximum 15 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre) for properties south of Terry Drive, east of Viewpoint Lane, and along Moonshadow Circle. Area C —Amend from CG-F2-a-d (Commercial General — Maximum Floor-Area-Ratio of 0.50 —Auto District Overlay— Design Overlay) to RM-15 (Residential Medium Density— Maximum 15 Dwelling Units Per Net Acre) for properties along portions of A Street and B Street, south of Warner Ave. and north of Blaylock Drive. Project Planner: Ricky Ramos 2. APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 03-08 (GOOD SHEPHERD CEMETERY) Appel[ant/Applicant: Mike Padian Request: To analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with a proposed expansion of Good Shepherd Cemetery_ The expansion includes three phases of construction over a seven to ten year period. The proposed improvements consist of an 85,000 square foot three-story mausoleum, a 10,000 square foot maintenance facility, one-story garden crypt buildings totaling 100,000 square feet, and construction of approximately 1,850 lineal feet of perimeter fencing. Location: 8301 Talbert Avenue (northeast corner of Beach Blvd. and Talbert Ave.) Project Planner: Paul Da Veiga G:\LEGAI.S\COUNCII.\05\050222.DOC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the initial environmental assessment for Item Nos. 1 and 2 were processed and completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. It was determined that Item No. 1 would not have any significant environmental effect and, therefore, a negative declaration is warranted. It was determined that Item No. 2, with mitigation, would not have any significant environmental effects and that a mitigated negative declaration is warranted. Negative Declaration No. 04-02 and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 03-08 are on file at the City of Huntington Beach Planning Department, 2000 Main Street, and are available for public inspection and comment by contacting the Planning Department, or by telephoning (714) 536-5271. ON FILE: A copy of the proposed request is on file in the City Clerk's Office, 2000 Main Street, Huntington Beach, California 92648, for inspection by the public. A copy of the staff report will be available to interested parties at the City Clerk's Office on Thursday February 17, 2005. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS are invited to attend said hearing and express opinions or submit evidence for or against the application as outlined above. If you challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. If there are any further questions please call the Planning Department at 536-5271 and refer to the above items. Direct your written communications to the City Clerk Joan L. Flynn, City Clerk City of Huntington Beach 2000 Main Street, 2nd Floor Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-5227 G:\I.EGAI,S\COi1NCIL\05\050222.DOC 4 CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPNIENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING REQUEST SUBJECT: >.- tiF 1-I1T ,.1E,& . ,,- d= 63—e:26 l 6Zt22t2-. �e__4�Z)) DEPARTTvEh`T: � MEETING DATE: 2 CO ACT: J&A t 11 — per. VF_Il_ PHONE:_[rt64 YES NO ( ) (►� ( ) Is the notice attached? ( ) ( ( ) Do the Heading and Closing of Notice reflect City Council(and/or Redevelopment Agency)hearing? Are the date,`day and time of the public hearing correct? If an appeal, is the appellant's name included in the notice? i I ( ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Permit,does the notice include appeal language? ( ) (✓� ( ) Is there an Environmental Status to be approved by Council? f ( ) ( ) (V Is a map attached for publication? Is a larger ad required? Size - i ( ) ( ) (✓ Is the verification statement attached indicating the source and accuracy of the mailing list? Are the applicant's name and address part of the mailing labels? ( ) ( ( ) Arc the appcilani's name and address part of the waling labels? If Coastal Development Permit,is the Coastal Commission part of the wading labels? VI ( ) ( ) If Coastal Development Pcrmit,are the resident labels attached? (✓ ( ) ( ,) Is the Report 33433 attached? (Economic Development Dept. items only) Pleasa followin,,complct the g. 1. Minimum days from publication to hearing date ja l/ , 2. Number of times to be published 3. Number of days betwctn publications 21 Jam Free Printing www.avery.com Q AVERY® 5960TM Use Ave TEMPLATE 596OTM 1-800-GO-AVERY 167 53128 69 167 531 28 69 167 531 28 69 OCCU?ANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17772PASEO CIR#B 17772 PASEO CIR#C 17772 PASEO CIR#D HUNWUTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 6M O 170 167 601 01 70 167 601 01 70 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17752BEACH BLVD#104 17752 BEACH BLVD#203 17752 BEACH BLVD#305 HUNTOGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 601 01 70 167 601 01 70 167 601 01 70 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 177528EACH BLVD#203 17752 BEACH BLVD#202 17752 BEACH BLVD#104 HUNTIGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 .. 16160101..74 _ 167 601 02.71 167 601 02 71 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17752BEACH BLVD#203 17742 BEACH BLVD#100 17742 BEACH BLVD#340 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167.60102 71 16760102 71 167.601 02 71 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17742 BEACH BLVD#235 17742 BEACH BLVD#215 17742 BEACH BLVD#350 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 60102 71 167 601 02 71 167 601 02 71 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT ..00CUPANT 17742 BEACH BLVD#330 17742 BEACH BLVD#345 17742 BEACH BLVD#305 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 60102 71 167 601 02 71 167 601 02 71 ; OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17742 BEACH BLVD#315 17742 BEACH BLVD#315 17742 BEACH BLVD#310 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 60102 71 167 601 02 71 MIKE PADIAt4 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 14 CRUCILLO DRIVE 17742 BEACH BLVD#355 17742 BEACH BLVD#360 SUITE A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA, CA 92688 ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ORANGE 2811 E. VILLA REAL DRIVE ORANGE, CA 92863 AH3AV-09-008-L w1096S 31MdW31®tiaAd asB w1096S OAHMV Q woriGane-A&M n 6ulluud 9ai3 wef jam rree rrmung www.avery.com rj,�t AVERy®5960T- Use AveryO TEMPLATE 5960TMI ��' 1-800-GO-AVERY V 933 130 41 fill 933 130 47 "o 933 130 49 � y Occupant Occupant Occupant 17884 Pollard Ln 17870 Pollard Ln 17892 Pollard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 52 933 130 59 f y 933 130 63 � Occupant Occupant Occupant 17915 Pollard Ln 17881 Pollard Ln 17835 Beard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313064 3�7 93313072 315 933 130 78 y� Occupant Occupant Occupant 17831 Beard Ln 1781.2 Beard Ln 17822 Beard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 86 933 130 89 3 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17851 Beard Ln 17846 Beard Ln 17831 La Costa Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 91 933 130 923<j .933 130 943�' Occupant Occupant Occupant 17825 La Costa Ln 17823 La Costa Ln 17817 La.Costa Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 13U96 933, 130 99 3 1, 933 131 08 . 51(7 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17811 La Costa Ln 17824 La Costa Ln 17701 Sergio Cir#201 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 9264.7 933.131 09 1 y f 933 131 10 3 y�, 933 131 17 3 5� Occupant Occupant Occupant 17701 .Sergio Cir#202 17681 Sergio Cir#102 17681 Sergio Cir#204 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 131 19Si 933 131 24 933 131 33 37Z Occupant Occupant. Occupant 17661 Sergio Cir#202 17661 Sergio Cir#104 17641 . Sergio Cir#204 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313138 377 93313148 MY 93313149 Of Occupant Occupant Occupant 17692 Sergio Cir#201 17722 Sergio Cir#104 17722 Sergio Cir#204 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 9331 �1_�1—_.� --933- Occupant I'L Occupant 17722 Sergio Cir#203 17722 Sergio Cir#202 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 w.L0965 31VId W 31 okaw ash Jla3AV-09-008-I �� 6ui;wid 88a3 wer w.L0965 ®A?J3AV Q worti8ne*N6V- n Jam Free Printing www.avery.com AVERY@ 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 932 180 96 �� 932 18099 / � 932 181 00 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8383 Benjamin Dr 17647 Brittany Ln 17645 Brittany Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 181 02 /�G� 932 181 06 /f 17 932 181 07 /q0 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17637 Brittany Ln 8417 Benjamin Dr 8419 Benjamin Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 181 10 /4f3 932 181 21 you 6f 932 181 22 �'y Occupant Occupant Occupant 8425 Benjamin Dr 8449 Benjamin Dr 8453 Benjamin Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 1.81.25 Z a� 93218121 040 932 18128 741 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8467 Benjamin Dr 8437 _Benjamin Dr 8439 Benjamin Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218131 fjq 93218137 Z?-0 93218138 Z/ Occupant Occupant Occupant 8475 Benjamin Dr 17647 Newland St 17643 Newland St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 181 39 y y L- 932 181 41 Z Z 6f 932 181 43 ZL(o Occupant Occupant Occupant 17637 Newland St 8442 Benjamin Dr 8450 Benjamin Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218144 0-1 932 181 50 � 3 932 181 52 5 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8425 El Arroyo Dr 8433 El Arroyo Dr 8413 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 181 54 f 932 181 57 ZQ 932 181 59 r-yZ Occupant Occupant Occupant 8417 El Arroyo Dr 8423 El Arroyo Dr 8428 Benjamin Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 04 y�f' 933 130 10 z lj 3 933 130 22 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17886 Maggie Ln 17861 Maggie Ln 17885 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 — 9 933 130 36 746f 933 130 37 I-P Occupant Occupant Occupant 17876 Hawes Ln 17891 Hawes Ln 17901 Hawes Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 g AIRAV-09-008-1 �� w1096S 31VIdW31 @AJany ash w1096S ®A2IaAV W0:)'Ai8ne•MMM 6ui;uiJd aaA3 wer Jam Free Printing www.avery.com Q AyERYO 5960'r- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 167 482 10 167 482 14 3d5 167 503 02 P Occupant Occupant Occupant 8252 Noble Cir 8241 Newman Ave 8282 Noble Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167 503 05 167 531 08 -�;Cf 167 531 24 S Occupant Occupant Occupant 8322 Noble Cir 8382 Newman Ave 8371 Talbert Ave Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 167 601 03 72, 167 601 12 167 601 14 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17772 Beach Blvd 17952 Beach Blvd 17772 Beach Blvd Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167601 18 167 60120 932 180 01 �,�/ Occupant Occupant Occupant 834.5 Talbert Ave 17822 Beach Blvd 8475 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 16q' 932 180 18 gyp/ 932 180 20 f0-3 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8447 El Arroyo Dr 8455. El Arroyo Dr 8463 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 23 9.32.18.0.30 !/3 932 180 38 �u Occupant Occupant Occupant 17731 Newland St 8458 El Arroyo Dr 8438 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 39 /1 932 180 47 13W 932 180 50 3 Occupant Occupant Occupant 8436 El Arroyo Dr 8412 El Arroyo Dr 8428 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 56 /31 932 180 59 /*/Z 932 180 66 /may Occupant Occupant Occupant 8408 EI Arroyo Dr 8380 El Arroyo Dr 17725 Brittany Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 70 154 932 180 72 /rjCJ 932 180 81 /k y Occupant Occupant Occupant 17707 Brittany Ln 17701 Brittany Ln 17679 Brittany Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 87 /70 932 18091 /14/ 93218094 Occupant Occupant Occupant 17661 Brittany Ln 17653 Brittany Ln 8375 Benjamin Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 w,0965 31VIdW31®AJared asn Akl3AV-09-008-L r 6ullulid aaJJ wel wi0965 @AZI3Ad worAJane•NW" Jam Free Printing www.avery.com Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY a AVERY® 5960TM 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD#400 17822 BEACH BLVD#400 17822 BEACH BLVD#400 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD#407 17822 BEACH BLVD#407 17822 BEACH BLVD#418 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT . 17822 BEACH BLVD#419 17822 BEACH BLVD#430 17822 BEACH BLVD#442 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD#452 17822 BEACH BLVD#452 17822 BEACH BLVD#473 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Jl113AV-09-008-L �� w1096S 31V1dW31®AGany ash wi0965®A?J3A11f ® uiortianeNU" 6ul}ulJd aW3 wef Jam Free Printing www.avery.com AVERY� 5960TM Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM �� 1-800-GO-AVERY . 167 201 20.82 167 201.20 .82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD#100 17822 BEACH BLVD#100 17822 BEACH BLVD#101 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 167 201'20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD#103 17822 BEACH BLVD#136 17822 BEACH BLVD#152 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 .82 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD #152 17822 BEACH BLVD#166 17822 BEACH BLVD#173 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 16T 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT . 17822 BEACH BLVD 4215 17822 BEACH BLVD#218 17822 BEACH BLVD#230 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 167 204.20 82 167.201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD#242 17822 BEACH BLVD#243 17822 BEACH BLVD#243 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 167.201 20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD#252 1.7822 BEACH BLVD#263 17822 BEACH BLVD#278 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH.BLVD#300 17822 BEACH BLVD#300 17822 BEACH BLVD#301 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 167.201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD#301 17822 BEACH BLVD#321 17822 BEACH BLVD#330 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD#342 17822 BEACH BLVD#343 17822 BEACH BLVD#343 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 167 201 20 82 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17822 BEACH BLVD#345 17822 BEACH BLVD#352 17822 BEACH BLVD#367 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 J1113AV-09-008-L W1096S 31V1dW31®tiaAV ash w1096S @AU-gAV ® wortiane•mmm 6ullulad 09J3 weL Jam Free Printing www.avery.com w AVERY® 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM � 1-800-GO-AVERY 167 482 30 38 167 482 30 38 167 483 27 40 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8201 NEWMAN AVE 8201 NEWMAN AVE#102 17691 VAN BUREN#A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 483 27 40 167 483 27 40 167 483 27 40 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17691 VAN BUREN#B 17691 VAN BUREN#C 17691 VAN BUREN#D HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 483.28 41 167 483 28 41 167 483 28 41 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17701 VAN BUREN#A 17701 VAN BUREN#C 17701 VAN BUREN #B HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 483 28 41 167 483 29 42 167 483 29 42 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17701 VAN BUREN#D 17711 VAN BUREN#A 17711 VAN BUREN #B HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 483 29 42 167 483 29 42 167 483 30 43 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17711 VAN BUREN#C 17711 VAN BUREN#D 8171 NEWMAN'AVE #A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 483 31 44 167 483 31 44 167.531 25 66 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8161 NEWMAN AVE#B 8161 NEWMAN AVE#C 17742 PASEO CIR#A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 531 25 66 167 531 25 66 167 531 25 66 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17742 PASEO CIR#B 17742 PASEO CIR#C 17742 PASEO CIR#D HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 531 26 67 167 531 26 67 167 531 26 67 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17752 PASEO CIR#A 17752 PASEO CIR#B 17752 PASEO CIR#C HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 531 26 67 167 531 27 68 167 531 27 68 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17752 PASEO CIR#D 17762 PASEO CIR#A 17762 PASEO CIR#B HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 531 27 68 167 531 27 68 167 531 28 69 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17762 PASEO CIR#C 17762 PASEO CIR#D 17772 PASEO CIR#A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 AkRAV-09-008-L ,096S 31vldW31 OfUany asG w1096S SAIMA W wortiane-AAmAn 6ul;u'Jd aaaj wed Jam Free Printing www.avery.com a AVERYO 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 1.65 181 36-22 165 181 36-22 165 181 37 23 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17931 BEACH BLVD#212 17931 BEACH BLVD#110 17911 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 165 181 38 165 181 38 _24 165 181 39 25 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17881 BEACH BLVD 17877 BEACH BLVD#B 1.7873 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264 165 181 39 25 165 181 39 25 165 181 39 25 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17877 BEACH BLVD 17875 BEACH BLVD 17871 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264 165 181 40 26 165 181 40 26 165 301 27 27 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17855 BEACH BLVD 17851 BEACH BLVD 17811 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264 165 302 21 28 165 302 21 28 165 302 21 28 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17827 BEACH BLVD 17849 BEACH BLVD 17855 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 165 302 21 28 165 302 22 29 165.130. 22 29 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17851 BEACH BLVD 17851 BEACH BLVD 17855 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 482 16 36 167 482 16 36 167 482 16 36 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17710 VAN BUREN#A 17710 VAN BUREN#B 17710 VAN BUREN#C HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 482 16 36 167 482 16 36 167 482 16 36 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17710 VAN BUREN#D 17706 VAN BUREN#A 17706 VAN BUREN#B HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 482 16 36 167 482 16 36 167 482 16 36 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17706 VAN BUREN#C 17706 VAN BUREN#D 17698 VAN BUREN#A HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 167 482 16 36 167 482 16 36 167 482 16 36 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17698 VAN BUREN#B 17698 VAN BUREN#C 17698 VAN BUREN#D HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 A113"-OD-008-1. w.L0965 31VIdW3i @AjaAd asB w10965 oAIJ3A W a word.iane•mmm 6ul;ulJd aaj3 we f Jam Free Printing www.avery.com a AVERY® 5960TM Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM '�� 1-800-GO-AVERY 157 381.04 .4 157.381.06 6 157 381 08 8 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8272 TALBERT AVE 8302 TALBERT AVE 8222 TALBERT AVE HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 157 381 10 9 157 381 12 11 157 481 01 15 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 8311 GLADYS AVE 8281 GLADYS AVE 18012 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92646 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 157 481 03 17 157 481 03 17 157 481 03 17 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 18042 BEACH BLVD 18042 BEACH BLVD#A 18062 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 157 481'04 18 157 481 08 19 159 141 66 20 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 18072 BEACH BLVD 8230 TALBERT AVE 18001 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON.BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 159 141 66 20 159 141 66 20 159 141.66 20 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 18021 BEACH BLVD 18023 BEACH BLVD 18027`BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 159 141 66 20. 159 141:66 20 1591.4t66 20. OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 18035 BEACH BLVD 18047 BEACH BLVD 18047 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 159 141 66 20 159 141 66 20 165 181 35 21 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 18055 BEACH BLVD 18061 BEACH BLVD 17941 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 16518135 21 16518135 21 165 181 35 21 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17543 BEACH BLVD 17955 BEACH BLVD 17971 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 165 181 35 21 165 181 36 22 165 181 36 22 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17969 BEACH BLVD 17931 BEACH BLVD 17931 BEACH BLVD#112 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 165 181 36 22 165 181 36 22 165 181 36 22 OCCUPANT OCCUPANT OCCUPANT 17931 BEACH BLVD#216 17931 BEACH BLVD#118 17931 BEACH BLVD#214 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 CV A113AV-09-008-1. �. w.L096S 31VIdW31 @AJany asB w.L096S @A213AV woyi(Jane-mA& r► 6UIIUIJd a8J4 wer Jam Free Printing www.avery.com a AVERY@ 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 93313146 385 93313147 386 93313148 387 Cheri Bolen Matthew Bender R A Koch 17702 Sergio Cir#102 11702 Sergio Cir#202 18451 Huntington St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 93313149 388 93313150 389 93313151 390 Roger Paul Riddlemoser Denise Tolbert Yoko Saito 401 Sidesaddle Cir 17722 Sergio Cir#103 17722 Sergio Cir Scotts Valley CA 95066 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313152 391 93313153 392 93313154 393 Timothy Boland Michael French Suzanne Scott 17722 Sergio Cir#101 17722 Sergio Cir#201 17722 Sergio Cir#102 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 131.55 . 394. .. Randall &Patricia Stewart 6562 Glen Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 All AV-09-008-L w.L096S 3.LVIdW3J.OAJDAV ash w1096S GAMMAH WO:)-AJane-MMM 6ul;ulad 98a3 weL Jam Free Printing www.avery.com a AVERY& 5960TM Use Avery®TEMPLATE 596OTM 1-800-GO-AVERY 93313116 355 93313117 356 93313118 357 Harriet Nord Chih-Chien Huang John Michael Bruce 17681 Sergio Cir#104 9671 Day Meadow Dr 17661 Sergio Cir#102 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313119 358 93313120 359 93313121 360 Gregory Meisenheimer Janice Marshall Christopher Schneider 5401 Meadow Cir 17661 Sergio Cir#101 17661 Sergio.Cir#201 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313122 361 93313123 362 93313124 363 Joel Cassara Elsa Alvarez Edward & Edna Surdock 17661 Sergio Cir#103 17661 Sergio Cir#203 16101 Birdie Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 933-131-25 -.. -- -.. .364. . 933 131 26 365 933 131 27 366 Fatemeh Minaie John Ramsey Tonya Frang-Archuleta 17661 Sergio Cir#204 17641 Sergio Cir#102 17641 Sergio Cir#202 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313128 367 93313129 368 93313130 369 Victoria Zalac Elroy Tamashiro David Keane Thomas 17641 Sergio Cir#101 17641 Sergio Cir#201 17641 Sergio Cir#103 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313131 370 93313132 371 93313133 372 Gregory Grankowski Richard & Cynthia Sanchez Asako Otaki 17641 Sergio Cir#203 17641 Sergio Cir#104 8807 Highpine St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Rosemead CA 91770 93313134 373 93313135 374 93313136 375 Michael Takashi Oki Gordon Dykeman Mauer James Grey 17652 Sergio Cir#201 17652 Sergio Cir 9202 17672 Sergio Cir#201' Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313137 376 93313138 377 93313139 378 Mohammad Bigdeli Grace Wertz Scott&Judy Sturdivant 17672 Sergio Cir#202 5212 Rim View Ln 17692 Sergio Cir#202 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Las Vegas NV 89130 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313140 379 93313141 380 93313142 381 Esther Shimizu Alan Fields Kenneth Wing-Keung Wong 17702 Sergio Cir#104 17702 Sergio Cir#204 17702 Sergio Cir#103 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313143 382 93313144 383 93313145 384 Robert Alan Sorenson Jonn Chrostowski Monica Tucker 17702 Sergio Cir#203 17702 Sergio Cir#101 17702 Sergio Cir#201 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 wi0965 ®AM3Ad o AH3AV-09-008-t w,.0965 31.VldW3.L @AjaAV ash wo:)v(Jane•MMM 6ul;ulJd aaJ3 wet Jam Free Printing www.avery.com o AVERY® 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 933 130 82 325 933 130 83 326 933 130 84 327 Charles Vossler Warren-Calder Mindy Berkihiser 17847 Beard Ln 16649 Spruce Cir 17852 Beard Ln #84 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 85 328 933 130 86 329 933 130 87 330 Susan Jo Adams Shaw Droker S E Goad 17848 Beard Ln 4572 Scenario Dr 17844 Beard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 88 331 933 13089 332 933 130 90 333 Mary Ann Goetz Kenneth Alan Wise Michael Osullivan 17842 Beard Ln PO Box 17893 17827 La Costa Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Irvine CA 92623 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 91 334 933 130 92 335 933 13093 336 Sorrentino . Frank Teplitzky Wendy Brewer 924 Sandwood PI 9738 El Durango Cir 17821 La Costa Ln San Pedro CA 90731 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 94 337 933 130 95 338 933 130 96 339 Philip Troy Tracy Quigley Lester Hill 1716 Bayou Way 17815 La Costa Ln 19951 Flagstone Ln Seal Beach CA 90740 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 933 130 97 340 933 13.0 98 341 933 130 99 342 Alan Young Glenda Maldonado Frank Teplitzky 17801 La Costa Ln 17822 La Costa Ln#98 9738 El Durango Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 93313100 343 93313101 344 93313106 345 Deanna Uston Ryan Oneill James Becker 17826 La Costa Ln 17828 La Costa Ln 9101 17721 Sergio Cir#201- Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313107 346 93313108 347 933 131 09 348 Steven Bonds Patrick Powers Scott Sturdivant 17721 Sergio Cir#202 7691 Gonzaga PI 27312 Becedas Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminster CA 92683 Mission Viejo CA 92691 93313110 349 93313111 350 93313112 351 Ham Todd Alan Vander Russell Wong Jose Herman Cubillo 17271 Forbes Ln 17681 Sergio Cir#202 17681 Sergio Cir#101 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313113 352 93313114 353 93313115 354 Ronald Gary Witteveen Jane Phillips Mary Davey 17681 Sergio Cir 1,201 17681 Sergio Cir#103 17681 Sergio Cir#203 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 AH3AV-09-008-1, wi096S 31dldW3J.®tiaAV asn wi096S GAIMAd a woriGane•mmm 6u'lulad 88a3 wet Jam Free Printing www.avery.com o AVERY®5960- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 933 130 52 295 933 130 53 296 933 130 54 297 Robert Rosa Joyce Thornton Robert Snyder 5941 Kenbrook Dr 19711 Pollard Ln 17901 Pollard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 55 298 933 130 56 299 933 130 57 300 Don Benac Mary Ross Harold Ahrens 17891 Pollard Ln 17887 Pollard Ln 17885 Pollard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 58 301 933 130 59 302 933 13060 303 Ellna Mack JUNE COAST PROPERTIES Marina Nichols 17883 Pollard Ln 18652 Florida St#300 17875 Pollard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 . 93313061 304 933 130 62 305 933 130 63 306 Janet Leland William Roth Thomas& Chrysteen Bandy 17873 Pollard Ln 17837 Beard Ln 13652 Paysen Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Westminster CA 92683 933 130 64 307 933 130 65 308 933 130 66 309 Randall Takahashi Todd &Julie.Fox Jerry Patterson 30525 Via Lindosa 17825 Beard Ln##6 17821 Beard Ln Laguna Niguel CA 92677 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 67 310 933 130 68 311 933 130 69 312 Ali Pahlavan Jon &Kristy Kaatmann Daniel Naulty 17817 Beard Ln 17815 Beard Ln 17811 Beard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 70 313 933 130 71 314 933 130 72 315 Todd Manthorne James Anderson Benjamin Kraut 17801 Beard Ln 17802 Beard Ln 3921 Sandune Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Corona Del Mar CA 92625 933 130 73 316 933 130 74 317 933 130 75 318 Roberta McDonald Wayne Gooding Louis Davia 17814 Beard Ln 17818 Beard Ln 17832 Beard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 76 319 933 130 77 320 933 130 78 321 Katherin Henninger Robert Drew Courtney 17826 Beard Ln 17824 Beard Ln 433 Alisal Rd #C Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Solvang CA 93463 933 130 79 322 933 130 80 323 933 130 81 324 Miles Babcock Joseph &Henrietta Aluise Jr. Earl Johnson 17841 Beard Ln 17843 Beard Ln 17845 Beard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 AM3AV-09-008-L ,096S 31.VldW3.L(@Ajany aSn w1096S (@AU3AAf o wos-AJane•nr MM 6utluud aaa3 wet Jam Free Printing www.avery.com Q AVERY@ 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 933 130 22 265 933 130 23 266 933 130 24 267 Charles Chambliss Scott Sandus Rochelle Pincus 806 Mimosa PI 17889 Maggie Ln#23 17912 Hawes Ln Indian Harbour Beach FL 32937 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 25 268 933 130 26 269 933 130 27 270 Leon & Diana Zavalkov Sandra Quinones Gerry Baker 17902 Hawes Ln#2 17892 Hawes Ln#26 17888 Hawes Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 28 271 933 130 29 272 933 130 30 273 Jennifer Cobbs Patricia Erdelyi Brady&Sherri Helm 17886 Hawes Ln 17882 Hawes Ln 17880 Hawes Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 31 274 933 130 32 275 933 130 33 276 Rodney Megli William & Poppy Payne Wade Tompkins 1399 Parkhill Ct 17874 Hawes Ln#3 17872 Hawes Ln Camarillo CA 93010 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 34 277 933 130 35 278 933 130 36 279 Harley Hausman William Skoug Linda Kindberg 17885 Hawes Ln 17887 Hawes Ln 6291 Mar Vista Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA,92647 933 130 37 280 933 130 38 281 933 130 39 282 Cherchian Teresita J Diaz Ronald Enriquez 18427 Santa Alberta Cir 17911 Hawes Ln#38 17888 Pollard Ln Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 40 283 933.13041 284 933 130 42 285 Michelle Webb Norman Haley Peter Skau 17886 Pollard Ln 29132 Kensington Dr 17882 Pollard Ln#42 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Laguna Niguel CA 92677 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 43 286 933 130 44 287 933 130 45 288 Daniel Kaz Grace Kwon Joseph Hernandez Jr. 17880 Pollard Ln 17876 Pollard Ln 17874 Pollard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 46 289 933 130 47 290 933 130 48 291 Rita Lynn Hanson Vicky Dages Mark Messina 17872 Pollard Ln 7822 Bayport Dr 17890 Pollard Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 49 292 933 130 50 293 933 130 51 294 Beth Wilford Marsha Fenton Deborah Carter PO Box 73850 17902 Pollard Ln 17912 Pollard Ln San Clemente CA 92673 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 A233"-09-008-L w1096S 31bndW31 OAJaAV as0 w1096S 0A?J3AV Q woriGane•nnnnnn 6ultuhd 88J3 wef Jam Free Printing www.avery.com ® AVERY® 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 93218152 235 93218153 236 93218154 237 Beverly Butters . Tricia Delgadillo Lubow 324 Pomona Ave 8411 El Arroyo Dr#153 21742 Windsong Cir Long Beach CA 90803 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 93218155 238 93218156 239 93218157 240 Patricia Magdaleno Michael Nolan Cecilia Loucks 8419 El Arroyo Dr#155 8421 El Arroyo Dr#156 13381 Del Monte Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Seal Beach CA 90740 93218/ 58 241 93218159 242 93218160 243 Kenda McConnell Thomas Anderson Chieu Pham 8426 Benjamin Dr 9021 Stacie Ln 8432 Benjamin Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Anaheim CA 92804 Huntington Beach CA 92647 .93313001 - 244 93313002 245 933 130 03 246 Kristine Haugaard Jonathan &Rochelle Cole Jennifer Sievers 17902 Maggie Ln 17892 Maggie Ln 17888 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 04 247 933 130 05 248 933 130 06 249 Constandeanna Wright Keith & Rachele Shelley Timothy &Amanda Steadman 163 Chandon 17884 Maggie Ln #5 17882 Maggie Ln#6 Laguna Niguel CA 92677 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313067 250 933 130 08 251 933 130 0.9 252 Brian &Tamara Loving Joseph Anthony Noceti Robert Liccardo 17876 Maggie Ln 17872 Maggie Ln 17862 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313010 253 93313011 254 93313012 255 AMERICAN PROPERTIES INC Masumi Ozawa Wilson Drysdale 19744 Beach Blvd #448 17871 Maggie Ln 17875 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313013 256 93313014 257 93313015 258 Deirdre Cleveland Peter Douglas Berke Dennis Smith 17881 .Maggie Ln 17901 Maggie Ln 17899 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93313016 259 93313017 260 93313018 261 Joseph Kwoiek James Iv&Andrea Shepard Michael Smith 17897 Maggie Ln 17895 Maggie Ln 17893 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 933 130 19 262 933 130 20 263 933 130 21 264 Pamela Downing Joseph Raymond Gloria Rodriguez 17891 Maggie Ln 17889 Maggie Ln 17887 Maggie Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 103"-09-008-L w.L096S 31VIdIN31®AGanv ash w1096S ®AU3AV © wo:)-tiane-AAmAA 6ul}ulad aaa3 wet Jam Free Printing www.avery.com ® AVERY® 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM �� 1-800-GO-AVERY 93218122 205 93218123 206 93218124 207 John Fiore Tuan Anh Phan Gary Mathias 96 Fairlane Rd 8457 Benjamin Dr 8463 Benjamin Dr Laguna Niguel CA 92677 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218125 208 93218126 209 93218127 210 Bruce Hoffman Mai Nhu Nguyen Frank Disparte 12022 Spencer Dr 8435 Benjamin Dr 8766 Tulare Dr#A-405 Garden Grove CA 92841 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 93218128 211 93218129 212 93218130 213 Douglas Simmons Pamela Kirkham James&Marsha Bowman 8342 Valencia Dr 8441 Benjamin Dr 8477 Benjamin Dr#130 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 .93218131 214 - 932 181 32 215 932 181 33 216 Christopher Graham Hulusi Kaplan Leonard Herman 4812 Royce Rd 8473 Benjamin Dr 8471 Benjamin Dr#133 Irvine CA 92612 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218134 217 93218135 218 93218136 219 Gail Landburg Kelley Damico Adrienne Cuenca 17629 Newland St#134 17625 Newland St 4135 17621 Newland St#136 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218137 220 93218138 221 93218139 222 Karen Bostock Ronald Miller Lillian Sowers 105 C Ct 4117 W Mc6dden Ave#5 17634 Newland St Phoenix OR 97535 Santa Ana CA 92704 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218140 223 93218141 224 93218142 225 Fang Ming Shen Dominic Migliorini James&Natalie Antista 17635 Newland St 18458 Santa Leonora Cir 8446 Benjamin Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218143 226 93218144 227 93218145 228 Terri Morgan-Richards Michael Nolan James McCoy 10286 Cardinal Ave 17612 Walnut St 8427, El Arroyo Dr#145 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218146 229 93218147 230 93218148 231 Lorraine Harden O'Brien Darrol Schaut Maria Manginelli 8429 El Arroyo Dr 8431 El Arroyo Dr 8437 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218149 232 93218150 233 93218151 234 Fernando Rojas Thomas James Miller Gregory McAthy 8435 El Arroyo Dr 4734 Pepperwood Ave 8415 E!Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Long Beach CA 90808 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Akl3AV-09-008-L ,096S 3J.V1dIN3J.@AJaAV aSn w1096S OAU3AV a worAaane•mmm 6ullulad aa13 wet Jam Free Printing www.avery.com ® AVERY® 5960TM Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 932 180 92 175 932 180 93 176 932 180 94 177 Daniel Newbury Benjamin DeSousa Wesley imayanagita 17651 Brittany Ln 8371 Benjamin Or 17333 Brookhurst St#C10 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 932 180 95 178 932 180 96 179 932 180 97 180 William Telford John Piekarski Diane Krupnak Turner 8379 Benjamin Or 7585 Ocean Point Ln 8387 Benjamin Or#97 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932180 98 181 932180 99 182 932 181 00 183 Gregory&Ariane McClellan Bharat Marolia Bryan Roe 17649 Brittany Ln 6161 Oakbrook Cir 1822 S Pennington Or Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Chandler AZ 85248 932,18101 - 184 932 181 02 - 185 932 181 03 186 Bonnie Lyn Baddon Ted Lewis Richard &Stephanie Mosqueda 17643 Brittany Ln 4057 Warner Ave 8411 Benjamin Or Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 181 04 187 932 181 05 188 932 181 06 189 Holly McLean Brian &Lindsay Moore Will Tempietion 8413 Benjamin Or 8415 Benjamin Or 4950 Lerkas Way Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Oceanside CA 92056 932 181 07 190 932 181 08 1.91 932.18109 192 Gerald Duhonich Anne Heslin Kathy'Gurela 10091 Jon Day Or 8421 Benjamin Or#108 8423 Benjamin Dr#160 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 181 10 193 932 181 11 194 932 181 12 195 Big Kathy Gurela Virginia Meza 16835 Algonquin St#250 8401 Benjamin Or 8403 Benjamin Or Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 181 13 196 932 181 14 197 932 181 15 198 Le Luong Marcos Pimentel Freitas Margaret.McAdam 8405 Benjamin Or 8407 Benjamin Or 8433 Benjamin Or Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218116 199 93218117 200 93218118 201 Christine Gestoso Jennifer Barish Cody Rodman 8431 Benjamin Or 8429 Benjamin Or#117 8427 Benjamin Or Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218119 202 93218120 203 93218121 204 Ronald Hurtado Joyce Chance Mark Sokol 8443 Benjamin Or 8445 Benjamin Or 70 41st Ave 14,2 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 San Mateo CA 94403 MBAt1-OD-008-1 L0969 31VIdW31(@ti9ny asn w1096S Q)AIJ- V a woriGane nnnnnn 6ul;ulAd aaaA we f Jam Free Printing www.avery.com ® AVERY® 5960TM Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM � 1-800-GO-AVERY 932 180 62 145 932 180 63 146 932 180 64 147 Jennifer Stalcup Robert Palmer Diane Horton 17717 Brittany Ln 17719 Brittany Ln 17721 Brittany Ln#64 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 65 148 932 180 66 149 932 180 67 150 Julia Mackin Cheryl Gordon Greg Ferrell 17723 Brittany Ln#65 8735 El Rancho Ave 17715 Brittany Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 68 151 932 180 69 152 932 180 70 153 Greg & Lisa Doherty Michael & Jodi Wiedemann Robert&Terry Hoffman 17711 Brittany Ln 17709 Brittany Ln #69 21995 Kingshill Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Mission Viejo CA 92692 932 180 71 154 - 932 180 72 155 932 180 73 156 Lorna Fuhrman William Thomas Fowler Darlene Milton 17703 Brittany Ln 19272 Worchester Ln 17697 Brittany Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 74 157 932 180 75 158 932 180 76 159 Jackie Nixon Elizabeth Zimmermann Jeffrey Huss 17695.Bdttany.Ln#74 17693 Brittany Ln 17691 Brittany Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 . Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 77 160 932 180 78 161 932 180 79 162 Philip Tanghal Angela Moore Ronald Bond 17689 Brittany Ln 17685 Brittany Ln 17683 Brittany Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 80 163 932 180 81 164 932 180 82 165 Steven Clausen Carl Oda Sally Wright 17681 Brittany Ln 15882 Plymouth Ln 17677 Brittany Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 83 166 932 180 84 167 932 180 85 168 Beverly Muscat Frances Limtiaco Carmen Torres 17675 Brittany Ln#83 17671 Brittany Ln #84 17667 Brittany Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 86 169 932 180 87 170 932 180 88 171 Joe Segura William Jackson Mary Mynar 17665 Brittany Ln 16818 Algonquin St 17659 Brittany Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 89 172 932 180 90 173 932 180 91 174 Thomas Quinlan Mike & Deborah Gendreau Sandra Koenig 17657 Brittany Ln 17655 Brittany Ln#90 270 Cagney Ln#107 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Newport Beach CA 92663 AH3AV-09-008-L W.L096S 31VIdW31®IGaA-v asn w1096S @AU3AV a wo:)-itaane•MMM 6wluud 88J3 wef Jam Free Printing www.avery.com AVERY® 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY y=' 932 180 32 115 932 180 33 116 932 180 34 117 Michael Benson Grant Lodge Miguel Najera 8452 El Arroyo Dr 8446 El Arroyo Dr#33 8442 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 35 118 98218036 119 932 180 37 120 A Patrick MacGrath Suzanne Gillespie Michael Lyman 8474 El Arroyo Dr 8476 El Arroyo Dr 8478 El Arroyo Dr#37 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 38 121 932 180 39 122 932 180 40 123 David & Nicole Barry Renee Meyers Cherene Cheever 16202 Typhoon Ln PO Box 3202 8434 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92605 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 41 124 93218042 - 125 932 180 43 126 Brooks &Betty Jones Steven Baranov Merrill.Higginson 8424 El Arroyo Dr#4 8422 El Arroyo Dr 8420 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 44 127 932 180 45 128 932 180 46 129 Ginger Jordan Katherine Thoren Danene Clark 8418 El Arroyo Dr 8416 El Arroyo Dr 8414 El Arroyo Dr Huntington.Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 47 130 932 180 48 131 932 180 49 132 Giorgina Acosta Margaret Shanley Virginia Rocha 8916 Silk Bonnet Ct 8410 El Arroyo Dr#4 8426 El Arroyo Dr#49 Las Vegas NV 89143 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 50 133 932 180 51 134 932 180 52 135 Carruth Gale Taylor Quown Ann Martin-Mc 18843 San Felipe St 8430 El Arroyo Dr 8432 El Arroyo Dr Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 53 136 932 180 54 137 932 180 55 138 Susan Kjellin Pamela Claudia Rodriguez Lisa Daye 8402 El Arroyo Dr#53 8404 El Arroyo Dr 8406 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 56 139 932 180 57 140 932 180 58 141 Greg Wiese Kurt Belbin Sylvia Worden 18011 Westlake Cir 8388 El Arroyo Dr#57 8384 El Arroyo Dr#58 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 59 142 932 180 60 143 932 180 61 144 Monica Mackell Kenneth lies Christopher&Jessica Kodrich 4435 Sea Harbour Dr 8376 El Arroyo Dr 8372 El Arroyo Dr Huntington Beach CA 92649 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 AWAt/-09-008-1 W.L0965 RVIdWR®Ajany asn w.L096S oAU3ANf wo:)•itaane•nnnMn 6ullulad aaJJ wet Jam Free Printing www.avery.com ® AVERY@ 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-AVERY 932 180 02 85 932 180 03 86 932 180 04 87 Brian Sindell Judy Wineinger Domenick Irrera 8483 EI Arroyo Or 8487 El Arroyo Or 17695 Newland St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 05 88 9.32 180 06 89 932 180 07 90 Wilma Frankwich Julianne Hirnes Gloria Jeanne Lanahan 17691 Newland St 17687 Newland St#6 17685 Newland St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 08 91 932 180 09 92 932 180 10 93 Ruth Ann Campbell Jose Berber Veronica Wehselau 17681 Newland St 8488 Benjamin Or 8482 Benjamin Or Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218011 94 93218012 95 93218013 96 Christiaan& Lei Hebel John Gahring Edd Siler 8474 Benjamin Or 8468 Benjamin Or 8464 Benjamin Or Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 93218014 97 93218015 98 93218016 99 Steve Kadolph Hector Ramirez Giorgina &Successors Acosta 8458 Benjamin Or 8443 El Arroyo Or 16410 Holmes PI Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Cerritos CA 90703 932180 17 100 932 180 18 101 932 180 19 102 H M Seth J R& Alison Gonzalves Matthew&Laura Ehrlich 8451 El Arroyo Or 18335 Gifford St 8461 El Arroyo Or Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 20 103 932 180 21 104 932 180 22 .105 Young Keun Yoon Greg Frichette Yvonne Jacobs PO Box 1502 8467 El Arroyo Or 8471 El Arroyo Or#22. Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 23 106 932 180 24 107 932 180 25 108 Jack Bartlett Janice Gaither Nhan Minh Huynh 15481 Cottonwood Cir 17733 Newland St 17739 Newland St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 26 109 932 180 27 110 932 180 28 111 Peter Evans Corrine Medina Patricia Buchanan 17743 Newland St#100 8472 El Arroyo Or - 8466 El Arroyo Or#28 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 932 180 29 112 93218030 113 932 180 31 114 Andy Becker Judith Lerner Jason &Jeny Carpenter 8464 El Arroyo Or 8422 Rembrandt Or 8454 El Arroyo Or Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 AH3AV-09-008-L w.L096S 31MIdW31®/G8Ad aSn w1096S 0AIMAV, a wori(aane•mmm 6ultuud aaa3 wef Jam Free Printing www.avery.com o AVERYO 5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960— 1-800-GO-AVERY 167 503 07 55 167 503 08 56 167 503 09 57 Irwin Fischbein H Richard Soulages Christopher Tran 8311 Newman Ave 8291 Newman Ave 8281 Newman Ave Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167 503 10 58 167 531 08 59 167 531 18 60 Leon Woodland Lawrence Gates Sr. Janis Bolander 8271 Newman Ave 12396 World Trade Or#106 8432 Jalm Or Huntington Beach CA 92647 San Diego CA 92128 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167 531 19 61 167 531 20 62 167 531 21 63 Sonny&Karen Nguyen Gustav Kirchweger Mark Cooper 8422 Jalm Or 8412 Jalm Or 8402 Jalm Or Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167 531 22 64 167 531 24 65 167 531 25 66 Barret Deck Mary Langston Karen Logan 8392 Jalm Or 4400 Macarthur Blvd#700 16017 Basil St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Newport.Beach CA 92660 Fountain Valley CA 92708 167 531 26 67 167 531 27 68 167 531 28 69 Thanh Nguyen Don Perumean John &Laura Reyno 17752 Paseo Cir 9875 James River Cir 1010 Main St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92648 167 601 01 70 167 601 02 71 167 601 03 72 KOS HB MEDICAL BUILDING INC GREENGLASS ASSOC LLC Huntington Beach Vhs 1250 S Sunset Ave#207 911 Main St#1500 20 Burton Hills Blvd#1 West Covina CA 91790 Kansas City MO 64105 Nashville TN 37215 167 601 08 73 167 601 12 74 167 601 13 75 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF 2811 E Villa Real Dr 2811 E Villa Real Or 2811.E Villa Real Or Change CA 92867 Orange CA 92867 Orange CA 92867 167 601 14 76 167 601 15 77 167 601 16 78 Huntington Beach Vhs Huntington Beach Vhs VHS HUNTINGTON BEACH INC 20 Burton Hills Blvd#1 20 Burton Hills Blvd #1 20 Burton Hills Blvd #1 Nashville TN 37215 Nashville TN 37215 Nashville TN 37215 167 601 17 79 167 601 18 80 167 601 19 81 VHS HUNTINGTON BEACH INC ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF 20 Burton Hills Blvd #1 2811 E Villa Real Dr 2811 E Villa Real Dr Nashville TN 37215 Orange CA 92867 Orange CA 92867 167 601 20 82 167 609 01 83 932 180 01 84 Huntington Beach Vhs HUNTINGTON BEACH CO Shari Mandel 20 Burton Hills Blvd #1 PO Box 285 1505 Huntington St#2 Nashville TN 37215 Houston TX 77001 Huntington Beach CA 92648 AH3AV-09-008-1 w.L0965 31VIdW31®iGaw asB w10965 GAIMAV o wortiane•niu" 6ul;uhd 88JJ wet Jam Free Printing www.avery.com r 1 AVE(Y®5960T- Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960— 1-800-GO-AVERY V 16518139 25 165 181 40 26 165 301 27 27 Artemio Ramil Donald Jones Housang Moayeri 18212 Foss Ln PO Box 4018 9 Rocky Point Rd Huntington Beach CA 92648 Newport Beach CA 92661 Corona Del Mar CA 92625 165 302 21 28 165 302 22 29 167 482 09 30 Mary Fox PURPLE PENUMBRA LLC Jodi Wagner 31551 Peppertree Bnd 9 Goodyear#200 8241 Noble Cir San Juan Capistrano CA 92675 Irvine CA 92618 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167 482 10 31 167 482 11 32 167 482 12 33 Roberson Raymond Kelly Sr. Long Sinh Dinh 16787 Beach Blvd 8262 Noble Cir 8261 Newman Ave Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167 482 13 .. - 34 167.482 14 35 167 482 16 36 Joanne Hilton Jimenez Louis Carl Bilandzija 8251 Newman Ave 1217 Alabama St 591 W Stafford Rd Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Thousand Oaks CA 91361 167 482 17 37 167 482 30 38 167 482 31 39 Ing Sei Hwang VAN BUREN PROPERTIES APOSTOLIC ASSEMBLY OF THE 5712 Highgate Ter 2075 Palos Verdes Dr N 8221 Newman Ave Irvine CA 92603 Lomita CA 90717 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167 483 27 40 167 483 28 41 167 483 29 42 Gordon Brown Jr. Ilona Miller Annemarie Thomas 17691 Van Buren St 6341 Beachview Dr 506 15th St Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 167 483 30 43 167 483 31 44 167 501 11 45 Gerald Henderson Donald Lyons Dave Ortiz 8171 Newman Ave#B 8161 Newman Ave#A 17692 Forest Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167 501 12 46 167 501 13 47 167 501 14 48 Ronald Cowper Michael Waldington Raymond 3rd Lenhausen 17712 Forest Ln 17722 Forest Ln 17732 Forest Ln Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167 503 01 49 167 503 02 50 167 503 03 51 June Garman Earl Mazzari William &Donna Zawicki 8272 Noble Cir 904 Acacia Ave 8292 Noble Cir Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92647 167 503 04 52 167 503 05 53 167 503 06 54 Roh Patel Gary Yee Alma Berube 8312 Noble Cir 9031 Wendy Cir 8321 Newman Ave Huntington Beach CA 92647 Fountain Valley CA 92708 Huntington Beach CA 92647 A113AV-OD-008-1 w.L096S 31VIdIN31®tiany asB m096S OAUMV Q wo:)-Aiane•mmm 6ul;uud aaJ3 wet Jam Free Printing www.avery.com Use Avery®TEMPLATE 5960TM 1-800-GO-VERY ANERY� 5960TM S USAN W. CASE, INC. 0TVINERSHIP LISTING SERVICE 917 Glen.neyre Street, Suite 7 - Laguna Beach, CA 92651 PHOIVE (949) 494-6105 - FAX(949) 494-7418 GOOD SHEPHERD FILE#904885 HIINTINGTON BEACH CA 300' OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS 167 601 08,12,19 SEPTEMBER 21 2004 157 381 01 1 157 381 02 2 157 381 03 3 Fred Infante Irene Bailey Dale Hoover 8242 Talbert Ave 8252 Talbert Ave 8262 Talbert Ave Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 157'381 04 4 157 381 05 5 157 381 06 6 TRY-PALMS FINANCIAL INC Vitalino Garzo Frank Ruiz 4455 S Pecos Rd #C 8282 Talbert Ave 32088 Via Seron Las Vegas NV 89121 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Temecula CA 92592 157 381 07 7 157 381 08 8 157 381.10 9 Juan Gonzalez Anita Pieratt Douglas Warren.Turner 8312 Talbert Ave 7921 Professional Cir 616 16kh St Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Huntington Beach CA 92648 157 381 11 10 157 381 12 11 157 381 13. 12 Ronald Rathbun Luong Bryan Edward Barnes 8301 Gladys Ave 624 Bluegrass St 8271.Gladys Ave Huntington Beach CA 92646 Simi Valley CA 93065 Huntington Beach CA 92646 157 381 14 13 157 381 15 14 157 481 01 15 Deene Brandt Mark Wilson Alice Jane Lambert 8251 Gladys Ave 8241 Gladys Ave 21112 Windchild Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington Beach CA 92646 Huntington.Beach CA 92646 157 481 02 16 157 481 03 17 157 481 04 18 Mary Jean Lambert Richard Bukowski Burgers In-N-Out 21112 Windchild Ln 380 Rancho Del Ray 13502 Hamburger Ln Huntington Beach CA 92646 Escondido CA 92025 Baldwin Park CA 91706 157 481 08 19 159 141 66 20 165 181 35 21 SCHOOL OCEAN VIEW DIST Evelyne Shabo SL BEACH LLC 17021 Beach Blvd 9100 S Sepulveda Blvd#12 PO Box 5620 Huntington Beach CA 92647 Los Angeles CA 90045 Newport Beach CA 92662 16518136 22 16518137 23 16518138 24 Leon Kuczynski Decatur Dilday Allen Hom 33 Rollingwood Dr 18612 Quarterhorse Ln 1652 Browning Rolling Hilts CA 90274 Huntington Beach CA 92648 Irvine CA 92606 A)13AV-09-008-1 &u096S 31V1dW31®tiaAV asn wi096S SAUMV a wortiane•nnnnnn 6ul;ulad awl we f ockway, City Clerk luntington Beach )f the City Clerk D. Box 190 i Beach, CA 92648 'C. 'klaz&gs02/�1/05 i r 157 �� Fre ' l anQ4i� ,XINGTpy 8 T ert A 92646h. Ca �HTI LEGAL NOTICE - PURI Ir Hti ntirigton Beach the City Clerk � Box 190 la FEB _ Beach, CA 92648 y X4, s*v* I11 r-fr, -azags ca/1 Y vs 1 93218151 234 INGTpy eg ry McAthy va„FO BF9 ITI ca LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ untington Beach �--- ' )f the City Clerk y �. Box 190 t i Beach, CA 92648 { - - J o 167 482 30 38 "1 VAN BUREN PROPERTIES (� " C 2075 Palos Verdes Dr N -ti i1NG Lomita CA 90717ARM 4r ' TpQ, luntington Beach of the City Clerk {, O.Box 190 r , n Beach, CA 92648 TX ffip*1pEik1 CA 32e3 02/T 1/cm . 1 167 483 27 46 Gordon Brown Jr. 17691 Van Buren St ►TINGTp Huntington Beach CA 92647 ��oero���F yBF - y , ;;.►� �o %NTY CP LEG - ING N ; _ - To �EN 1)f]CT - I1�1�lEf 1'Il=!?1333I331ElI3?;iF?IIIEltil1f33I=I-Fi1Il33?i'i?:3j C.r� -.—. Huntington Beach of the City Clerk ± `n .O. Box 190 ,n Beach, CA 92648 7KX 00#4-E3?9 CA g2eme 02/11/t3 1 `3 167 482 10 �HTINGTp `� Occupant �Mro�„Eyd�• 8252 Noble Cir =_ 9y Huntington Beach CA 92647 'ouNTI s�F�®�� P BLIG HEARING FWDG ORDER.EXPIRED: Ii?13?FFIFi311ei?IF?ii?;3.3FIII luntington Beach A the City Clerk °w D. Box 190 3 :y i Beach, CA 92648 - 93218059 142 Monica Mackelt TING Tp 4435 Sea Harbour Dr ! Huntington Beach CA 92649 w■ros,.fe 9 Huntington Beach of the City Clerk .0. Box 190 >n Beach, CA 92648 ;__RIFEMU Y ZD S£F4It� t?T ` t,F t�L AS 9;M&SED 932 181 00 183 �NZINGTp Bryan Roe H� 1822 S Pennington Dr � 'L �•`°"'°""fo Fq Chandler AZ 85248 -vim---- Q 71/NTY LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING _ { 1..•���.i3'a3��,;', ..�� .- .. .,, '.(`}r�?aEiiil'.tl?!?-fii��iai:i'f.iiiiii�i�i�.i.��.:i�e7.•iit?3?:?.i't?;� ' f Huntington Beach .�t e of the City Clerk „ r P.O. Box 190 ton Beach, CA 92648 - t 41 F 167 531 08 59 Lawrence Gates Sr. 12396 World Trade Dr#106 pHTINGjp�, San Diego CA 92128 0Ty LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING ._ 32�t� '•• -� - -"�� - l-. .. -.-1#!!!lliltl i�.�f;�.il�ilslsl-lis.tt i���ia�ls{�ti-iliisillsiil tl i.�l Huntington Beach of the City Clerk 'O. Box 190 m Beach, CA 92648 r - _ ° �, ' r, rr ' -' 167 609 01 83 l�l BEACH CO �ptiNGTp�, Intington Beach the City Clerk = Box 190 Beach, CA 92648 a2548 Iro., 0CC -820 "G1 NGTON BEACH-CA F, BF = y 18072 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92648 LETN RETURN ITY PdDcR To cFNDELEGAL NOTICE - UN N>p� y Huntington Beach M , > of the City Clerk '.O. Box 190 m Beach, CA 92648 ..- 4 r. ---_ r r t S r• -f.�k. ►.s-r.�c--rc T.A. faII• IT'i vp1 �GLI�� iJG! NSINGTp�, 933 130 22 265 •G°.ro4,.fo 6F Charles Chambiiss q 806 Mimosa PI = y Indian Harbour Beach FL 32937 o �p WNTY Ga�� LEGAL NOTICE = PUBLIC HEARING j..•y�ij�'�,1�`x�••�t�,c'�c� 11,I,,,,I,I,I1,.,1.�1i;,�I,11,,,,,,,Ill,t�r'11,,,1';1,,11 �.�,:1,11 Huntington Beach .of the City Clerk \ '.O. Box 190 >n Beach, CA 92648 X � EIM LR 92893 02/%%/Cz 1 933 131 19 358 1TINGjpy Gregory Meisenheimer 5401 Meadow Cir Huntington Beach CA 92649 f HOntington Beach e of the City Clerk P.O. Box 190 ton Beach, CA 92648 t 932 181 04 187 �NSINGTQ,y Holly McL 8413 Be min Dr Hunti on Beach CA 92647 - s My '�uNTY ---- - _ o s 6 IC BLIC HEARING f i'�tni 0Rn; f ✓t r�r�: +Sg? 004 46 V� Huntington Beach of the City Clerk :.O. Box 190 r - on Beach, CA 92648 — 7 w- %�. 'g2$M3 02ti1/t�5'. . t 159 141 66 . 20 61 ,. „` Evelyne Shabo 9100 S Sepulveda Blvd #1.2 Los Angeles CA 90045 pN1INGTQy min,: 5sa ►'7"�->•f.�lA � FLiJ('i FII:i v{� __ems.------_. . °ufrTr cP` LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING L-JAWAtJ P 5 0s 4 i ffli►�fi,� If,,, l,►t,i►f��f,,fi,�f;,„lirif�ff�iJ,i„f,,�li Huntington Beach " Al 9 J of the City Clerk , , '.O. Box 190 on Beach, CA 92648 f t 932 8142 225 Jam s&Natalie Antista 844 Benjamin Dr 41INcroy Hu tington Beach CA 92647 ntington Beach 7` the City Clerk '' 3 3 Box 190 3each, CA 92648 7K74 fi"t=m%" CA -A M. %/ems !, 30 roNwG„Tfn` 93 27 k� 70p10 Ger 1 awes tn H on Beach CA 92647 QUR RETURN n (zV Jniv7 4. Tr MEW EARING - ID 0 rR _�e t F V ,,. ... d r f- �itit. titt- }}t}}I:illitIIIIIIIIIIIIi-I}i?:Itl!III II slit tit ff ntington Beach the City Clerk Box 190 -� 3each, CA 92648 %x i~a• %M ca .....- 'YB�, 167 601 12 ro,,.fo Occupant 17952 Beach Blvd Hun gton Beach CA 9264 *; oQ RETURN - RETURN T . _ TO S EN O E R Yam,,_._.__ . -- . __ _ , 0 S E N*l�E / tGAL NOTICE - U®LMHEM.MG,, Ss I !I.l?liiiltli-ititl�it1I-tI.:fiili!$ klti'.�,}iiii -,. . ._'„"°'A—'.,a>'--e�..�.��x:=��.--�-�-- .--:-z,�.�t--'�'-t----a�rssr—.�.- _,:;.;:�:...-...::.-< r... .. __:�.�. .r-.a,.� '>-�.,'��.�:•:��-.. ..�-a,..a,, t., - .. �_- .aw"�.,.::-` mac.^.-.,:.....v�^�-•z—,._ ntington Beach ' the City Clerk ;; Box 190 - 3each, CA 92648 i M F 93218159 �f/Z Occupant 8428 Benjamin Dr NGTp Huntington Beach CA 92647 Huntington Beach of the City Clerk '.O.Box 190 m Beach, CA 92648 � � t aat It1 Cc► z L'»c* 1 1 1 08 / 19 St 1H O L OCEAN VIEW DIST 17021 B ach Blvd 11TINGTp�, Huntin n Beach CA 92647 Mca P044 r s - , — . i RETURN GT`� 1Tn 'j�'REPMAL OTICE - PUBLICS jH=EAR.,,G _ ` )J?-I.11i}19i3:�l,t:?I?}lb,I?I L t.,i.t?I I Itli '�i -A,I., J I".?II?t. �i? .i 11i ^xm -luntington Beach 1 of the City Clerk O. Box 190 n Beach, CA 92648 — �' .fir 16518135 21 OCCUPANT 17955 BEACH BLVD WTINGTpy HUNTINGTON BEACH-CA 92647 ��ro�„fo BF �._ �. RETURN lie�.f0 `\�o TO SEN�JEP, - TO 'ENDER TY ca LEG L�UOB �E HEAR G i+1 ! 11 11 11 1j1! ti 1f1 t{{ii fs 1 i{ 1 1 t( = 2 4: ii�i�tltl3�ll: lil4flllllt7itrtlte1MfItIM11.tt:ilite�imIilfI1 Huntington Beach ~f' of the City Clerk '.O. Box 190 >n Beach, CA 92648 ' =- - BUR�l 165 181 35 21 OCCUPANT tMINGTpy 17971 BEACH BLVD Big' HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 s untington Beach f ' ;iof the City Clerk .0. Box 190 -n`Beach, CA 92648 - s kE. 165181 35 21 OCCUPANT 17969 BEACH BLVD i1TINGTpy HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9.2647 t'tAll rolfO �� ills Fo 0 LEGAL NOTICE PU9tIC HEARING_ i fill,re,lilill,„1z.4111,iXtift�t'�1l,l,tdlar,l,li,l1,3,i l,f1 Huntington Beach CA,pl C" "� "® of the City Clerk'.O. Box 190 'i!on Beach, CA 92648 q - - � ,S 4�1, ro o q°SUCH N�N � pT UMB93218016 9 SU�Fi Ep NQ Giorgina &Succes or Acosta NCTDEC DER qpKNQN 0,F CFAs 16410 Holmes PI RO(iTAe�,7'0 A t64Sq� O VACAIV,T Cerritos CA 90703 �NTINGTp�, "NUiyQER`�i Rp DA_cssRE-�Q&D Rro�4 rfo RUNTY ca` - LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING t .irss3 'tt' z o 7' HA1111A ll11116ll;,Lll,l,,,,lll.11,11"ll,l„ll,,,,ildl ntington Beach the City Clerk z ' k Box 190 3each, CA 92648 t A. X fi1T - I C Szbgs 02//i 1/as i 932 181 ,43 Occu ant 8450 Benjamin Dr NGTpy Hunti gton Beach CA 92647 ntington Beach �- the City Clerk Box 190 3each, CA 92648 - 165 181 35 21 OCCUPANT iNGTp �s / 17543 BEACH BLVD HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 Z _ }��LTi:KN Q RETURN \�o U S E 0 ca` TO SEN _P.. R iv LEGAL NOTICE - PUBLIC RAR I I E � dE� `. v.a tlrret�i�t��ttt�tr�tltlti.�t)esisfliltittf��riititt l,tttrt�tii r itington Beach - the City Clerk Box 190 3each, CA 92648 4 9 3 13060 303 �.. Ma ina Nichols INGTpy 178 Pollard Ln Hunti ton Beach CA 92647 R`. URN ---`" — , -0 E1,t�Eft��.-.� - - LEG NOTICE - PUBLIC HEARING yi owil _ a _; 92d6.47 ntington Beach the City Clerk _ Box 190 4 3each, CA 92648AIVIJ - - � " i 932.181 9 19 NGT Kathy G rela - fp0'y9 12t BntomCR Hunin n Beach 8423 j #16roe„ 4&, TY R LEIGALN N I HEARING 1 t y( TO SENDER ram,: •'i ` _.j 2- 4 1is sf3aa st �s l rsir i ss tesirtrs�7srssfl:i7 ATTEMPTED itington Beach _' the City Clerk Box 190 3each, CA 92648 165 301 27 27 NGTp�, OCCUPANT P044rfo B 17811 BEACH BLVD F9� HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 9264 �- -- i RETURN !! 1'UtaN 1 U R N TO SE DER 80 _ TY LE AT� IC HE ING - + �ssi:�s�s��ssr1ssiLtols��rs�stiJIisis+I 11s111r111isradl l i, CITY OF HUNTINGTOi-i BEACH INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION TO: Honorable Mayor Hardy and City Co c*1 Members VIA: Penelo Culbre - dmini trator FROM: Paul Emery, Acting Director of Public Works DATE: March 21, 2005 SUBJECT: Good Shepherd Cemetery Drainage Concerns Related to Proposed Expansion Concerns about the Good Shepherd Cemetery entitlements and City requirements have been raised to the City Council by a representative of the applicant that are currently processing a proposed expansion of the Good Shepherd Cemetery located on the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Talbert Avenue. More specifically in a recent e-mail sent to all City Council members by Mike Padian of the Padian Team Consulting, concerns were expressed regarding Public Works' requirements associated with site drainage and the two existing storm water detention areas located on the proposed expansion site. The following provides a background of relevant information associated with this issue. As far back as five years ago, when representatives of the Good Shepherd Cemetery first approached the City about their expansion plan, Public Works staff identified the related drainage concerns associated with the site to the Cemetery representives including the need to maintain the historical storm water storage (detention) volume within the site. This storage currently accrues within two ravines that traverse across the site from Talbert Avenue north towards Newman Avenue. These ravines are part of what remains of a historical sump, or low spot, that has always been subject to flooding as far back as available records indicate including the 1949 USGS TOPO maps (prior to most development in the area). Through the 1950's and into the early 1960's several tracts to the north were developed and drainage facilities were constructed so that storm waters were collected from this historic sump area and diverted north into the County Flood control channel behind the present Lowes Hardware store on Warner Avenue,just east of Beach Boulevard. In 1962, the current housing tract just north of the proposed expansion site was developed and two drainage pipes were constructed in Newman Avenue so as to allow the two bisected ravine areas to drain. Our records indicate that the property in question (proposed cemetery expansion area) was previously owned by the Huntington Beach Company. Records also indicate that historical flooding and detention of water within these ravines pre-date the Cemetery's ownership and has been/is an encumbrance on the property (not of a temporary nature as the applicant describes) that must be accounted for. There have also been several physical examples during storm events that validate our record information. Residents and City staff have witnessed a great deal of significant flooding over the years in the area just downstream of this project along Jefferson Street and Michael Drive. I have also attached the following photos taken by City staff during prior winter storms of the subject property and Newman Avenue. G:Eng\Elliott\Good Shepherd Cemetery Drainage Concerns(3.21.05) i k u 5>' Looking south at Good Shepherd Cemetery viewed from house on north side of Newman Avenue. Ravines are full of water in background. 1994 AL p w Ravines overflowing and water flowing off Good Shepherd Cemetery northerly across Newman Avenue into adjacent housing tract. Picture from porch of house in prior photo. 1995 2 DADocuments and Settings\GreeneJ\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK84D\Good Shepherd Cemetery Drainage Concerns(3.21.05).doc 71 From the beginning, our requirements given to the applicant regarding these existing detention areas have been clear and consistent with specific modifications to address different site plans, which are a drainage system, shall be designed and constructed to maintain the current water storage volume plus any additional runoff that will be generated by the development above the existing flows. Originally as mitigation measures the proposed detention basins were to be constructed with maximum 5:1 earthen slopes (H:V) for the purpose of maintenance and operation by the City. The reason why the applicant appealed the Mitigated Negative Declaration is to increase the slopes of the detention basins to 2:1 (H:V). Public Works is in agreement with the modification of the earthen slopes to 2:1 provided that a Landscape License Agreement is processed by the Applicant to provide for the maintenance of the slopes by Good Shepherd Cemetery. Also, prior to issuance of any grading and/or building permit, the floodwater and storage calculations will be submitted to staff for review and approval, the sizes of the detention basins will be specified within the study. The long discussion within Mr. Padian's e-mail is really a history or testimony of City staffs efforts to explore, present or review a host of options or possible solutions to solve the applicant's problem. Unfortunately, this e-mail contains many misleading statements or misconstrued facts that seem to be aimed at developing an illustration that they are being unjustly treated or encumbered upon, when in fact City staff has made numerous attempts to develop acceptable solutions while the applicant has continually argued for elimination of the detention facility or for the City to accept a substandard solution. It is evident by the above photos that we have a serious drainage challenge adjacent to this property and that the applicant must fully address this issue before any grading or development can be approved. Also, the property has a pre-existing flood related encumbrance that will remain with the property until such time, if ever, that a solution can be implemented to resolve the existing downstream drainage challenge. cc: Jennifer McGrath, City Attorney Howard Zelefsky, Planning Director David Webb, City Engineer Terri Elliott, Principal Civil Engineer Paul De Veiga, Associate Planner 3 G:Eng\Elliott\Good Shepherd Cemetery Drainage Concerns(3.21.05)